Agenda packet — Placentia City Council, April 21, 2026 (part 5 of 6)

636

4. The Storm Drain Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit B to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit B.

5. The Public Safety Impact Fees, known as Fire, Police, and Animal Shelter fees described in the attached Exhibit B to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit B.

6. The Quimby Fee (In -Lieu Park/Open Space Fee) described in the attached Exhibit B to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit B.

7. The General Government Facilities Fee described in Exhibit B to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit B.

8. The Transit Oriented Development ("TOD") Streetscape Infrastructure Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit B to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit B.

9. The TOD Sewer Impact Fee described in the attached Exhibit B to this Resolution subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code and the terms contained in the Exhibit B.

B. The fees authorized by this section shall be cumulative such that each owner of a lot or property shall be charged each applicable fee, subject to any credits, deferrals, waivers and/or reductions authorized and set forth in Chapter 5.02 of the Placentia Municipal Code. Moreover, the amount of each of these fees shall not exceed the fair share of the estimated cost of constructing and/or acquiring the corresponding facilities described in the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Report.

The amount of each fee shall be reviewed and revised from time to time, but not more than once annually, and shall be set by resolution of the City Council following due notice.

Section 6. Be it further resolved that any other resolutions and/or parts of any other resolution in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Section 7. Adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act because the adoption of this resolution is not a project, in that it is a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4)), and because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the fees may have a significant effect on the environment, in that this Resolution contains no provisions modifying physical design, development, or construction of residential, commercial or industrial development or the construction of any development project. This exemption is based on CEQA Guidelines Resolution No. R-2026-22

Page 5 of 9 ends

637

Section 15061(b)(3), 15378(b)(4), and 15273. Further, for any improvements set forth in the Capital Improvement Plan, additional CEQA analysis will be required prior to construction of any improvements.

Section 8. Should any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Resolution for any reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Resolution, it being hereby expressly declared that this Resolution, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase hereof would have been prepared, proposed, approved, adopted and/or ratified irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

Section 10. The fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution go into effect 60 days from the adoption of this Resolution, and concurrent with the effective date of this Resolution, Resolution No. R-2024-18 shall be repealed and replaced with this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April 2026.

Chad P. Wanke, Mayor
ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
Resolution No. R-2026-22

Page 6 of 9 ends

638

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia, held on the 21st day of April 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

COUNCILMEMBERS:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Exhibit A: Capital Improvement Plan
Exhibit B: Development Impact Fees
Resolution No. R-2026-22

Page 7 of 9 ends

639

EXHIBIT "A"

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Resolution No. R-2026-22

Page 8 of 9 ends

640

EXHIBIT "B"

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Resolution No. R-2026-22

Page 9 of 9 ends

641

Capital Improvement Plan for Development Impact Fees
General Government Facilities
Facility Location Size Units Timefram Land Building Equipment Total Cost e Acquisition Cost Cost
Cost
City Hall
Expansion
(Equipment)
City Hall
Expansion
(Equipment)
City Hall
Expansion
(Equipment)
City Hall
Expansion
(Equipment)
City Hall
Expansion
(Equipment)_
City Hall
Expansion
Total Facilities
Cost
Less Offsetting
Revenues
(Existing Fee
Balance)
Net Facilities Cost
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
50 PCs
2040
8 Wireless 2040
APs
3 Network 2040
Switches
3 Servers 2040
60 VOIP 2040
Desk
Phones
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000 $50,000
$3,200 $3,200
$30,000 $30,000
$75,000 $75,000
$9,000 $9,000

2.45 17,265 Bldg SF $6,737,500 $13,570,290 $167,200 $20,474,99 Acres 0
General Plan Element Conformity: Sustainability/Safety
$20,474,99
0 ($67,199!
$20,407,79
1 642

Fire Facilities
Facility
Location Size Time- Units Land Building/Equipmen Total Cost frame Acquisition t Cost
Cost
New Fire Station 3
Equipment for new Station 3:

Self Contained Breathing
Apparatus, Washer, Tools,
Plymovement, IT
Fire Truck
TBD
New Fire
Station 3

1.6 Acres
2031
2031
10,00 Bldg
0 SF
Fire Station 2030 1 Vehicle
2/3
Total Facilities Cost
Less Offsetting Revenues
(Existing Fee Balancel
Net Facilities Cost
General Plan Element Conformity: Sustainability/Safety
$4,400,000
$13,000,000 $17,400,000
$1,000,000
$18,400,000
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
$2,000,000
$20,400,000
($67,1991
$20,332,801
643

Police Facilities
Facility
Location
Sizes/Units
Time-
frame
Land
Acquisition
Cost
Building/ Total Cost
Equipment
Cost
New Police Station
New Police Sub -Station
Total Stations
Patrol Cars
Mobile Command
Vehicle
Total Vehicles
Surveillance Cameras
License Plate Readers
(LPRs)
Total Facilities Cost
Less Offsetting
Revenues (Existing Fee
Balance)
Net Facilities Cost
TBD
Downtown
(building acquired
from existing
retail owner)
At all future Police
facilities
New Police
Station
Citywide
Citywide

2.0 Acres
13,000 Bldg SF 2040

0.0 Acres 10,000 Bldg SF 2030

2.0 23,000 Bldg SF
General Plan Element Conformity: Sustainability/Safety/Mobility 5 Vehicles 2040
1 Vehicle 2030
6 Vehicles
43 Camera 2030
s
4 units 2030
$5,500,000 $34,532,000 $40,032,00
0 $543,000 $543,000
$5,500,000 $35,075,000 $40,575,00
0 $500,000 $500,000
$3,000,000 $3,000,000
$3,500,000 $3,500,000
$225,000 $225,000
$100,000 $100,000
$44,400,00
0 ($245,795)
$44,154,20
5 644

Parks Facilities
Facility
Facilities/Equip
ment Cost
Location Size
Timeframe for
completion
FY
ADA sidwalk Safety Improvements
Fencing Safety Improvements
Sports Netting at Champions Sports Complex
Champions Sports Complex park lighting
Solar Bollards at Kraemer, McFadden, Los Ninos for
walking paths
Mcfadden Park walking path, mini pitch Improvements
Parque de Los Vaqueros playground
Dog Park (Tori Hunter or Richard Samps Park)
Restroom Pre -Fab Expansion
Cement Fix and Shade Sails at Pickleball Staging Area
Kraemer Memorial Park Playground Expansion
Kraemer Middle School Lights Improvements
Richard Samp Playground Expansion
Aguirre Rental Facility Expansion
Whitten Community Center Kitchen Expansion
Whitten Community Center Flooring in Kids Room, AV
Equipment wiring
Mcfadden Pool expansion, staff office expansion
Tuffree Gymnasium Expansion
Backs Community Center Expansion
Total Buildings
Master Plan
Total Facilities Cost
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balancel
Net Facilities Cost
General Plan Element Conformity: Sustainability/Open
$3,000,000
$1,200,000
$65,000
$1,000,000
$300,000
$1,200,000
$350,000
$85,000
$1,800,000
$175,000
$510,000
$1,000,000
$350,000
$45,000
$90,000
$120,000
$1,250,000
$225,000
$2,500,000
$15,265,000
$300,000
$15,565,000
($741,801)
$14,823,199
Space & Recreation
Multiple Locations
Multiple Locations
505 Jefferson St.
505 Jefferson St.

Multiple Locations
900 S. Melrose St.
1200 N. Carlsbad St.

Multiple Locations
Multiple Locations
Multiple Locations
201 N. Bradford Ave.
645 N. Angelina Dr.
600 Loyola Dr.
505 Jefferson St.
900 S. Melrose St.
900 S. Melrose St.
900 S. Melrose St.
2101 N. Tuffree Blvd
201 N. Bradford
Ave
multiple sites na
na
na
na
na
.25 mile
3000 sq ft
unknown
multiple sites na
5000 sq ft
na
2000 sq ft
5125 sq ft
9275 sq ft
na
na
4800 sq ft
10716 sq ft
26-27
27-28
27-28
28-29
26-27
26-27
26-27
29-30
28-29
26-27
27-28
26-27
26-27
26-27
26-27
27-28
29-30
27-28
28-29
27-28
645

Transportation Facilities
Project Name
Scope
Facility Cost
Location
Size
Estimated
Completion
Date
Lakeview Ave at Miraloma
Van Buren St at Orchard Dr
Placentia Ave at Santa Fe
Kraemer Rd at Connecticut
Way
Miraloma at Van Buren
Class I Shared -Use Path
Class II Bike Lane
Class IIB Buffered Bike Lane
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard
Install Traffic Signals
Install Traffic Signals
Install Traffic Signals
Install Traffic Signals
Install Traffic Signals
Install 2 miles of Class I Bike
lanes
Install 1.2 miles of Class II
Bike Lanes
Install 5.4 miles of Class IIB
Buffered Bike Lanes
Install 7.2 miles of Class IIIB
Bike Blvds
Class IV Separated Bikeway Install 8.5 miles of Class IV Bikeways
$210,800
$210,800
$204,600
$291,400
$195,300
$3,240,000
$165,500
$8,208,000
$4,456,800
$9,139,200
Lakeview Ave at
Miraloma
Van Buren St at
Orchard Dr
Placentia Ave at
Santa Fe
Kraemer Rd at
Connecticut Way
Miraloma at Van
Buren
Carbon Creek
Channel
Madison Ave,
Chapman Ave
Rose Drive, Alta
Vista, Bastanchury
Morse Ave,
Angelina Dr,
Bradford Ave,
Madison Ave, La
Jolla St
Kraemer Blvd,
Chapman Ave,
Melrose St, Palm
Dr, Yorba Linda
Blvd
Installation of 3 signal
poles, associated wiring,
timing and restoration
work
Installation of 4 signal
poles, associated wiring,
timing and restoration
work
Installation of 3 signal
poles, associated wiring,
timing and restoration
work
Installation of 4 signal
poles, associated wiring,
timing and restoration
work
Installation of 4 signal
poles, associated wiring,
timing and restoration
work
Contruction of 2 mile
Class I Bike Lane along
Carbon Creek Channel
Construction of 1.2 miles
of Class 11 Bike Lanes
Construction of 5.4 miles
of Class IIB Bike Lanes
Construction of 7.2 miles
of Class IIIB Bike Lanes
Construction of 8.5 miles
of Class IV Bikeways
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
646

Total Facilities Cost
General Plan Element Conformity: Sustainability/Mobility Transportation Facilities (TOD)
$26,322,400
Project Name
Scope
Facility Cost
Location
Size
Estimated
Completion
Date
Class IV Separated Bikeway
Placentia Ave/Crowther Ave
Orangethorpe Ave/Placentia Ave
Orangethorpe Ave/SR-57
Northbound Ramps
Orangethorpe Ave/Melrose St
Kraemer Blvd/Orangethorpe Ave
Install 8.5 miles of Class IV
Bikeways
Street improvements along
Placentia/Crowther
Street improvements along
Orangethorpe/Placentia
Street improvements along
Orangethorpe/57 N fwy ramps
Street improvements along
Orangethorpe/Melrose
Street improvements along
Kraemer/Orangethorpe
Total Facilities Cost
General Plan Element Conformity: Sustainability/Mobility $975,800
$124,000
$558,000
$310,000
$124,000
$124,000
$2,215,800
Melrose Bike Lane
Improvements
Striping and signal
timing improvements at
intersection
Striping and signal
timing improvements at
intersection
Striping and signal
timing improvements at
intersection
Striping and signal
timing improvements at
intersection
Striping and signal
timing improvements at
intersection

0.82 mile
Class IV Bike
Lane
At intersection
At intersection
At intersection
At intersection
At intersection
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
647

Sewer Facilities (Non-TOD Area Only)
Project Location - Capacity Increase
Facility Cost
(Non-TOD)
Location
Size
Estimated
Completion
Date
Bradford Ave, Orange Grove Ave, Walnut
Ave, Santa Barbara St, Placentia Ave
Twilight St, Sunrise Way, Sunrise St,
Melody Ln, Chapman Ave, Placentia Ave
Orangethorpe Ave
Orangethorpe Ave, Melrose St, Silverlake
Dr, Glenlake Dr
Tuffree Blvd
Bastanchury Rd
$6,837,228
$2,478,606
$1,232,652
Bradford Ave, Orange Grove
Ave, Walnut Ave, Santa
Barbara St, Placentia Ave
Twilight St, Sunrise Way,
Sunrise St, Melody Ln,
Chapman Ave, Placentia Ave
Orangethorpe Ave
$3,533,898 Orangethorpe Ave, Melrose St,
Silverlake Dr, Glenlake Dr
$937,052 Tuffree Blvd
$580,854 Bastanchury Rd
Total Facilities Cost $15,600,290
General Plan Element Conformity: Sustainability
Sewer (TOD)
Approximately 2.25 miles of
sewer line capacity
improvements
Approximately 1 mile of sewer
line capacity improvements
Approximately 0.5 miles of
sewer line capacity
improvements
Approximately 1.3 miles of
sewer line capacity
improvements
Approximately 2100 LF of sewer
line capacity improvements
Approximately 1300 LF of sewer
line capacity improvements
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
Project Location - Capacity Increase
Facility Cost
(TOD Only)
Location
Size
Est.

Completion
Date
TOD/Old Town CIP Project Cost (Crowther
Ave)
$2,245,646
Total Facilities Cost $2,245,646
General Plan Element Conformity: Sustainability
Crowther Ave,
Placentia Ave,
Orangethorpe Ave
Approximately 0.25 miles of
improvements and associated land
acquisition
TBD
648

Streetscape (TOD)
Project Name
Scope
Facility Cost
(TOD Only)
Location
Size
Estimated
Completion
Date
TOD Streetscape
Improvements
Total Facilities Cost
Offsetting Revenues
Total Facilities Cost
Streetscape
Improvements
$4,100,000
$4,100,000
($877,937)
$3,222,063
General Plan Element Conformity: Sustainability/Mobility Remaining streetscape improvements
along Crowther Ave including land
acquisition costs and street
improvements
Approximately
.25 mile
segment of
improvements
TBD
649

EXHIBIT "B"
TO RESOLUTION NO. R-2026-22
City of Placentia Development Impact Fee Schedule
Non-TOD Area
Land Use Type
Police Fire General Parks Transportation Sewer TOD TOD Admin Government Sewer Streetscape
Single Family
Residential 1
Multi -Family 1
$2,998.9 $1,821.88 $1,740.36 $735.49 $963.70 $598.98 NA NA 8 $2,009.5 $1,220.79 $1,166.17 $492.83 $658.37 $342.28 NA NA 3 Mobile Homes 1 $1,861.9 $1,131.12 $1,080.51 $456.63 $834.36 $299.49 NA NA 3 $44.30
$29.45
$28.32
Commercial/Retail 2 $3,705.4 $2,251.03 $2,150.31 NA $2,425.69 $392.88 NA NA $54.63 0 Office 2 $3,566.7 $2,166.79 $2,069.84 NA $830.12 $392.88 NA NA $45.13 3 Industrial 2 $1,534.5 $932.25 $890.54 NA $381.66 $419.06 NA NA $20.79 7 Hotel/Motel 2 $425.61 $258.56 $246.99 NA $619.14 $342.28 NA NA $9.46 TOD Area Police Fire General Parks Transportation Sewer TOD TOD Admin Land Use Type Government Sewer Streetscape
Single Family $2,998.98 $1,821.88 $1,740.36 $735.49 $963.70 $598.98 $0.00 $0.00 $44.30 Residential 1
Multi -Family 1
Mobile Homes 1
$2,009.53 $1,220.79 $1,166.17
$492.83
$658.37
$342.28
$882.89
$1,131.76
$39.52
$1,861.93 $1,131.12 $1,080.51 $456.63 $834.36 $299.49 $0.00 $0.00 $28.32 Commercial/Retail 2 $3,705.40 $2,251.03 $2,150.31 NA $2,425.69 $392.88 $1,013.41 $4,169.82 $80.54 Office 2 $3,566.73 $2,166.79 $2,069.84 NA $830.12 $392.88 $1,013.41 $1,427.00 $57.33 Industrial 2 $1,534.57 $932.25 $890.54 NA $381.66 $419.06 $1,080.95 $656.09 $29.48 Hotel/Motel 2 $425.61 $258.56 $246.99 NA $619.14 $342.28 $882.89 $1,064.32 $19.20 For Non-TOD Area and TOD Area fee tables above
1 Residential Land Use Type (per unit)
2 Non -Residential Land Use Type (per, 1,000 sq. ft or per hotel/motel room) 1,2 Land Use Types are defined in Development Impact Fee Justification Study dated April 15, 2026 Applicable Citywide Development Impact Fees for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) for Non-TOD Area and TOD Area fee tables above shall be calculated as follows: For ADUs of less than 750 square feet: None. For ADUs of 750 square feet or more on a lot containing single family dwelling(s): The product of: (full fee for single family dwellings) x (square footage of the proposed ADU / square footage of primary dwelling) = ADU Development Impact Fee. For ADUs of 750 square feet or more on a lot containing multi -family dwellings: The product of: (full fee for multi -family dwellings) x (square footage of the proposed ADU / average square footage of the multi -family units on site) = ADU Development Impact Fee.

For JADUs: JADUs that are permitted and contained within the existing square footage of a single-family residence shall not be subject to Citywide Development Impact Fees. However, JADUs that are part of new construction or are constructed as part of an addition to a single-family residence shall be subject to Development Impact Fees at the same rate as a single-family residence.

Resolution No. R-2026-22
Exhibit B
650

Quimby Fee Unit Total
Land Use Type 1
Single Family Attached & Detached
Multi -Family (2-4 Units)
Multi -Family (5+ Units)
Mobile Homes
1 Land Use Types are defined in Development Impact Fee Justification Study dated April 15, 2026 Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
$5,455.00
$5,020.00
$5,020.00
$3,994.00
Storm Drainage and Unit (Area A) (Area C) (Area G) [2] Unit Animal Animal Shelter Shelter
Land Use T • e 1
Single Family
Detached
Single Family Per Unit $272.57
Attached
Per Unit
$333.77
$152.43
$4,625.00
Per Sq. Ft
$0.011
$123.50
$4,625.00
Per Sq. Ft
$0.022
Multi -Family Housing Per Unit $208.05 $94.57 $4,625.00 Per Sq. Ft $0.033 Mobile Homes Per Unit $312.63 $141.29 $4,625.00 Per Sq. Ft $0.022 Commercial/Retail Per Sq. Ft $0.211 $0.089 $4,625.00 Per Sq. Ft N/A Office Per Sq. Ft $0.133 $0.067 $4,625.00 Per Sq. Ft N/A Industrial Per Sq. Ft $0.377 $0.167 $4,625.00 Per Sq. Ft N/A 1 Land Use Types for Storm Drainage and Animal Shelter fees only are defined as:

Single-family detached housing means detached one -family dwelling units.

Single-family attached housing means attached one -family unit buildings with an assessor's parcel number for each dwelling unit.

Multifamily housing means buildings or structures designed for two or more families for living or sleeping purposes and having kitchen and bath facilities for each family.

Mobile home means a development area for residential occupancy in vehicles that require a permit to be moved on a highway, other than a motor vehicle designed or used for human habitation and for being drawn by another vehicle.

Retail/Commercial means buildings to be used for retail, general commercial, hotel/motel, private school, and similar nonresidential occupancy.

Office means a building to be used for general business services, professional office, medical office, and similar nonresidential occupancy. 2 Storm Drainage Impact Fees for Area G only shall be set at $4,625 per acre* pursuant to Agreement between the City of Placentia and the Yorba Linda Water District until it's expiration on October 11, 2027. Said Impact Fees shall not be automatically adjusted annually.

Applicable Citywide Development Impact Fees for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) for Storm Drainage and Animal Shelter fees above shall be calculated as follows: For ADUs of less than 750 square feet: None. For ADUs of 750 square feet or more on a lot containing single family dwelling(s): The product of: (full fee for single family dwellings) x (square footage of the proposed ADU / square footage of primary dwelling) = ADU Development Impact Fee. For ADUs of 750 square feet or more on a lot containing multi -family dwellings: The product of: (full fee for multi -family dwellings) x (square footage of the proposed ADU / average square footage of the multi -family units on site) = ADU Development Impact Fee.

Resolution No. R-2026-22
Exhibit B
651

RESOLUTION NO. R-2026-23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UPDATED AFFORDABLE HOUSING

IMPACT FEES PURSUANT TO CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX FOR
RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS CITYWIDE;

AND DETERMINE THAT THE ADOPTION OF THE AFFORDABLE

HOUSING IMPACT FEES IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, to implement the affordable housing goals, policies and programs of the City's Housing Element, In 2017 the City Council considered and adopted an affordable housing ordinance ("Affordable Housing Ordinance") that, among other things, authorized the imposition of residential affordable housing impact fees for certain residential development projects to mitigate the impact of such projects on the need for affordable housing in the City of Placentia ("City"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq., ("Mitigation Fee Act") the City is empowered to impose fees and other exactions to provide necessary public facilities required to mitigate the negative effects of new development in the City; and
WHEREAS, the proposed fees are based upon the information contained in two documents prepared by City Staff and DTA Public Finance, Inc. entitled Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Non -Residential Justification Study, City of Placentia and Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Residential Justification Study, City of Placentia, both dated April 2026 (collectively "Nexus Study"); and
WHEREAS, to ensure that development projects remain economically feasible, the recommended residential and non-residential affordable housing impact fees, as shown in the Exhibit "A" attached hereto an incorporated by reference, do not exceed the justified fees needed to mitigate the actual affordable housing impacts attributable to the development projects to which the fees relate, as determined by the Nexus Study; and WHEREAS, the Affordable Housing Ordinance and Title 5 of the Placentia Municipal Code authorizes the City Council to adopt by resolution residential affordable housing impact fees, and update said fees, and the City Council desires to do so; and WHEREAS, at least ten days prior to the date this resolution is being heard, data was made available to the public indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the service for which the fee or service charge is levied, and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the service, including general fund revenues, in accordance with Government Code Section 66019; and
Resolution No. R-2026-23

Page 1 of 4 ends

652

WHEREAS, at least fourteen days prior to the date this resolution is being heard, notice was provided to any persons or organizations who had requested notice, in accordance with Government Code Section 66019; and
WHEREAS, notice of the hearing on the proposed fee was published twice in the manner set forth in Government Code Section 6062a as required by Government Code Sections 66004 and 66018; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the information contained in this Resolution and the accompanying staff report and any attachments at a meeting held on April 21, 2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. The findings of the Nexus Study have been considered and are hereby incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 3. The facts and substantial evidence in the record establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for affordable housing and the impacts of the development described in the Nexus Study for which the corresponding fee is charged, and that there is also a reasonable relationship between the use of the residential affordable housing impact fee and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as is described in more detail in the Nexus Study.

Section 4. The Nexus Study sets forth cost estimates, in 2026 dollars, that are reasonable for constructing affordable housing, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed these costs.

Section 5. The City Council hereby adopts those residential affordable housing impact fees shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

Section 6. The City Council finds that all of the affordable housing impact fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution do not exceed the actual affordable housing impacts of the development projects to which those affordable housing impact fees relate, as further set forth in the Nexus Study.

Page 2 of 4 ends

653

development, or construction of residences or the construction of any development project. This exemption is based on CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), 15378(b)(4), and 15273.

Section 8. Be it further resolved that any other resolutions and/or parts of any other resolution in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Section 9. Should any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Resolution for any reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Resolution, it being hereby expressly declared that this Resolution, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase hereof would have been prepared, proposed, approved, adopted and/or ratified irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.

Section 11. The fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution go into effect 60 days from the adoption of this Resolution, and concurrent with the effective date of this Resolution, Resolution No. R-2024-23 shall be repealed and replaced with this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April 2026.

Chad P. Wanke, Mayor
ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
Resolution No. R-2026-23

Page 3 of 4 ends

654

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

COUNCILMEMBERS:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Exhibit A: Affordable Housing Impact Fees
Resolution No. R-2026-23

Page 4 of 4 ends

655

EXHIBIT "A"

AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT FEES
Affordable Housing Unit Total
Land Use Type'
Single Family
Detached
Townhome
Condominium
Apartment
Per Unit $12,513.00
Per Unit
Per Unit
Per Unit
$8,939.00
$8,939.00
$3,575.00
Commercial/Retail Per Sq. Ft $5.19
Office Per Sq. Ft $5.19
Industrial Per Sq. Ft $1.97
Hotel/Motel Per Sq. Ft $0.87
1 Land Use Types are defined in Development Impact Fee Justification Study dated April 15, 2026 Resolution No. R-2026-23
Exhibit
A
656

ORDINANCE NO. 0-2026-05

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 5 OF THE PLACENTIA MUNICIPAL CODE (SCHEDULE OF FEES) TO ADD SECTION 5.02.105 "GENERAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES FEES" ESTABLISHING A

CITY FACILITIES IMPACT FEES AS PART OF THE CITY'S

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM, AND ADOPTING

NECESSARY FINDINGS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CITY
FACILITIES IMPACT FEES.

City Attorney Summary
This Ordinance would add Section 5.02.105 to the City of Placentia Municipal Code establishing a City Facilities Fee on new development and conversions to fund the construction, expansion, renovation, and improvement of City buildings and related facilities.

A. RECITALS
WHEREAS, the continuing growth of the City of Placentia ("City"), combined with the expectation of high-quality services by persons who live and work in the City have encouraged a review of the City's existing and future City facilities made necessary by new development; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq., ("Mitigation Fee Act") the City is empowered to impose fees and other exactions to provide necessary public facilities required to mitigate the negative effects of new development in the City; and
WHEREAS, the type of improvements that public facility fees can pay for include the construction, expansion, renovation, and improvement of government facilities; and WHEREAS, it is fair and equitable for new development to pay its fair share and contribute to the financing and development of government facilities; and WHEREAS, the proposed fees are based upon the information contained in a document and addendum prepared by City staff and DTA Public Finance, Inc. entitled Development Impact Fees Justification Study, City of Placentia, dated April 2026 (t "Nexus Study"); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to add a General Government Facilities Fee to its development impact fee program; and
Ordinance No. 0-2026-05

Page 1 of 4 ends

657

WHEREAS, copies of the Nexus Study are on file in the City Clerk's office and have been made available for public review in accordance with state law, as more fully described below; and
WHEREAS, the City has: 1) made available to the public, at least ten days prior to its public hearing, data indicating the estimated cost required to provide the facilities and infrastructure for which these development fees are levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide those facilities and infrastructure; 2) mailed notice at least fourteen days prior to this meeting to all interested parties who have requested notice of new or increased development fees; and 3) held a duly noticed, regularly scheduled public hearing on April 21, 2026, at which time oral and written testimony was received regarding the proposed fees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the staff report, the Nexus Study and all oral and written testimony.

B. ORDINANCE

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Section 5.02.105 of the Placentia Municipal Code is added in its entirety as follows:
§ 5.02.105 General Government facilities fees.
(a) Findings. The City Council finds:
(1) Additional or remodeled government facilities are needed to accommodate future growth and maintain an acceptable level of existing government facilities for all areas of the City of Placentia. (2) New development or conversions within the City of Placentia result in increased usage of the existing government facilities, which thereby increases the service requirements and capital equipment requirements of the government facilities. Such increased usage does not ordinarily result from mere subdivision or parcel map divisions of existing properties in the absence of new development or conversions.
(3)
In the absence of the imposition of a government facility impact fee upon new development or conversions, the additional capital expenses necessary to maintain an acceptable level of civic services for the entire City would be unfairly imposed upon the owners and Ordinance No. 0-2026-05

Page 2 of 4 ends

658

residents of the existing buildings and improvements within the City of Placentia.
(4) The government facility fee will be used to fund the construction, expansion, and improvement of government facilities that are needed to serve new development.
(5)
The facts and evidence presented in the City's impact fee study establish that there exists a reasonable relationship between the need for government facilities improvements and the impacts of the types of new developments or conversions for which a
corresponding fee is charged. A reasonable relationship or nexus also exists between the fee's use and the type of new development or conversions for which the fee is charged.
(b) Schedule of General Government Facilities Fees. A general government facilities fee shall be imposed on new development or conversions within the City of Placentia. See Section 5.02.180 "Schedule of development impact fees." (c) There is hereby established and created a fund of the City entitled "General Government facilities impact fund" and all revenues derived from and monies collected under this section, including accrued interest thereon, shall be deposited in such fund.

The City facilities impact fund is established for the sole purpose of providing money for the construction, expansion, renovation, and reconstruction of City facilities.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia held on the 21st day of April 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 2026
Chad P. Wanke, Mayor
ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 0-2026-05

Page 3 of 4 ends

659

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia held on the 21st day of April 2026, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia, held on the day of , 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

COUNCILMEMBERS:

ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Ordinance No. 0-2026-05

Page 4 of 4 ends

660

ORDINANCE NO. 0-2026-08

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 5 OF THE PLACENTIA

MUNICIPAL CODE (SCHEDULE OF FEES) BY AMENDING CHAPTERS

5.01 (FEES SET BY RESOLUTION), 5.03 (TRANSIT ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT (TOD) DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES), 5.12 (FIRE
DEPARTMENT) AND 5.24 (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT) AS PART
OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM.

City Attorney Summary
This Ordinance would clean up Title 5 (Schedule of Fees) of the City of Placentia Municipal Code to delete selections that no longer apply, revise the Fire Department to remove references to Orange County Fire, and provide clarification as to fees applicable to Transit Oriented Development.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Section 5.01.010 of the Placentia Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:

Fees related to the work of the building division, the planning department, the police department, the fire and life safety departmen the public works department, and the community services department shall be established by city City council Council resolution.

Section 2. Section 5.03.020(a) of the Placentia Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
§ 5.03.020 Description of fees.
(a) Development impact fees are hereby established on new development or conversions within the TOD area of the city—City of Placentia to pay for public improvements related to civic improvement projects, public safety, sewer projects, traffic mitigation, storm drain and parks as set forth in Chapter 5.02 as well as the fees set forth in this Chapter. In the following section ;Sections, the city City council Council sets forth the specific amount of the development fee for each type of public improvement project.

Section 3. Section 5.03.100 of the Placentia Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety.

Section 4. Chapter 5.12 (Fire Department) of the Placentia Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Ordinance No. 0-2026-08

Page 1 of 4 ends

661

Chapter 5.12 Fire Department
§ 5.12.010. Adoption of fire and life safety department fees. § 5.12.020. Administration.
§ 5.12.030. Definitions.
§ 5.12.040. Alarm business, central station and false alarm service charges. § 5.12.050. Intentional false alarms—Penalties.
§ 5.12.010. Adoption of fire and life safety department fees.

The City Council is authorized to provide by resolution the amount of each fee which shall be charged to those City residents who request, require or incur fire prevention, false alarm and other miscellaneous services provided by the Fire and Life Safety Department.

Said fees may be amended by the City Council from time to time. § 5.12.020. Administration.

The Fire and Life Safety Department of the City is authorized to administer the fire department fee schedule and take collection and enforcement action as may be necessary.
§ 5.12.030. Definitions.

For the purpose of this Chapter the words set out in this Section shall have the following meanings:
"False alarm" means an alarm necessitating response by the fire department where an emergency situation does not exist. This shall include mechanical failure, accidental tripping, misoperation, malfunction, misuse or neglect of an alarm system. "Fire department" means the City of Placentia Fire and Life Safety Department. "Fire department" includes and also means the emergency response agency. "Person" means any individual, occupant, business owner, partnership, corporation, or other entity.
§ 5.12.040. Alarm business, central station and false alarm service charges.

In addition to such other fines or penalties established by law, a false alarm service fee is imposed upon the residential occupants and/or commercial owner and/or operator of the premises wherein a false alarm was made and any central station owners and operators who initiated the fire department's response to such premises. The City Council is authorized to provide by resolution the amount of each fee which shall be charged to those City residents and/or businesses who incur false alarm charges and/or penalties and other miscellaneous charges relating to alarm systems and businesses for services provided by the fire department.

Ordinance No. 0-2026-08

Page 2 of 4 ends

662

§ 5.12.050. Intentional false alarms—Penalties.

No person shall intentionally initiate a false alarm except for purposes of testing an alarm system and then only if made in accordance with the rules and regulations of the fire department therefor and after having given the emergency response agency or the fire department prior notice thereof. Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be also subject to such other penalties prescribed by law.

Section 5. Sections 5.24.030 (Storm drain acreage fees), 5.24.060 (Sewer acreage fees) and 5.24.090 (Thoroughfare acreage fees) of the Placentia Municipal Code are hereby deleted in its entirety.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia held on the 21st day of April 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 2026
Chad P. Wanke, Mayor
ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 0-2026-08

Page 3 of 4 ends

663

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
1, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia held on the 21st day of April 2026, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia, held on the day of , 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

COUNCILMEMBERS:

ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Ordinance No. 0-2026-08

Page 4 of 4 ends

664

•
www.FinanceDTA.com

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE

JUSTIFICATION STUDY

CITY OF PLACENTIA
April 15, 2026
Public Finance
Public -Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
Irvine / San Jose / San Francisco / Riverside
Dallas / Houston / Raleigh / Tampa
665

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 220
Irvine, CA 92612

CITY OF PLACENTIA

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY
Prepared for:

City of Placentia
401 E Chapman Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
666

TABLE

OF CONTENTS

SECTION
PAGE
I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A Organization of the Report 1
B Impact Fee Summary 2
II INTRODUCTION 4
III LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 6
C Assembly Bill ("AB") 602 10
IV DEMOGRAPHICS 11
A Existing Development within the City (as of
January 1, 2025) 13
B Future Development within the City (2025-2040)14
C Future Reduction in Development within the City
(2025-2040) 16
D Equivalent Dwelling Unit Projections 16
V FEE CALCULATIONS 23
A Police Facilities Fee 23
B Fire Facilities Fee 31
C General Government Facilities Fee 38
D Parks Facilities Fee 43
E Quimby Parks Fee 49
F Transportation Facilities Fee 52
G Streetscape Facilities Fee 60
H Sewer Facilities Fee 67
I Other Facilities 77
VI IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES 78
A The Collection of Development Impact Fees 78
B The Assignment and Expenditure of Fee Revenue 79
C Exemptions, Reductions, and Waivers. 79
D Developer Improvement Credits 79
E Existing Development Credit 80
F Annual Reporting and Accounting of Fees 80
G Refunding Policy 81
H Administration Costs of Fee Implementation 82
I Indexing of Impact Fee Rates 82
667

3 Updating the Impact Fee Study 82
VII FEE SUMMARY 83

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

DEMOGRAPHICS SUMMARY

FEE MODELS
668

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
To adequately plan for new development and identify the public facilities and costs associated with mitigating the direct and cumulative impacts of new development, DTA (formerly David Taussig and Associates) was retained by the City of Placentia (the "City") to update the existing impact fee program by preparing a new AB 1600 Fee Justification Study (the "Fee Study"). The Fee Study is intended to comply with Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code, which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, by identifying additional public facilities that will be required by new development in the City ("Future Facilities") and determining the level of fees that may be imposed to pay the costs of the Future Facilities. As described further herein, the City has designated a roughly 37 -acre site within the City as a Transit -Oriented Development ("TOD") area. The fee amounts to be determined will finance police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape (TOD area only), and sewer at levels identified by the various City departments as necessary to meet the needs of new development through 2040. The Future Facilities and associated construction costs are identified on the City's Needs List for police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities, which is included in Section V of the Fee Study. Facilities for parks shall also be funded through an impact fee pursuant to the Quimby Act. A description of the methodology used to calculate the fees is included in Section V. The purpose of this report is to ensure that all new developments mitigate their direct and cumulative impacts by paying their "fair share" of the cost of the new infrastructure through the development fee program.

A Organization of the Report
This Development Impact Fee Study Report will be presented in the following seven (7) sections:
• Section I contains an Executive Summary, a brief introduction to the report, and an overview of the proposed fees.
• Section II of this report introduces the study, including a brief description of the City's surroundings and background information on development fee financing. • Section III provides an overview of the legal requirements for implementing and imposing the fee amounts identified in the Fee Study. Included is a discussion of the findings required under the Mitigation Fee Act and the requirements necessary to be satisfied when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of new development, and satisfies the nexus requirements for each facility included as part of this study.
• Section IV includes a discussion of land use characteristics for projected new development and demand variables such as population and the number of housing units and non-residential building square feet through 2040.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
1 669

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Section V includes a description of the Needs List, which identifies the facilities needed to serve new development through buildout in 2040 that are eligible for funding by the impact fees. The Needs List provides the total estimated facilities costs, offsetting revenues, net costs to the City, and costs allocated to new development for all facilities listed in the Needs List. This section also describes the methodology used to determine the fees for all facility types and presents the proposed fees for each of the land types. Facilities for parks associated with a new subdivision with less than 50 parcels shall be funded through the impact fee pursuant to the Quimby Act as well as AB 1600 impact fees charged Citywide.

Section VI presents the steps to adopt, administer, and implement the development impact fees.

Section VII presents a summary of the development impact fees.

This report includes an appendix section presenting the calculations used to determine the findings presented in this report.

Appendix A includes the demographics summary.

Appendix B includes the calculations used to determine the various fee levels.

B Impact Fee Summary
B.1. Fee Amounts by Land Use
The total fee amounts for each land use are summarized below in Table ES -1 (Non- TOD area), Table ES -2 (TOD area only), and Table ES -3 (Quimby). Fees presented in this study reflect the maximum fee levels that may be imposed on new development.

Table ES -1: Development Impact Fee Summary (Non-TOD area) Single Family
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
$2,998.98
$2,009.53
$1,861.93
Comm./Retail $3,705.40
Office $3,566.73
Industrial $1,534.57
Hotel/Motel $425.61
$1,821.88
$1,220.79
$1,131.12
Residential Property (per unit)
$1,740.36
$1,166.17
$1,080.51
$735.49
$492.83
$456.63
$963.70
$658.37
$834.36
$598.98
$342.28
$299.49
Non -Residential Property (per, 1,000 sq. ft or per hotel/motel room) $2,251.03
$2,166.79
$932.25
$258.56
$2,150.31
$2,069.84
$890.54
$246.99
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
NA
NA
NA
NA
$2,425.69
$830.12
$381.66
$619.14
$392.88
$392.88
$419.06
$342.28
$44.30
$29.45
$28.32
$54.63
$45.13
$20.79
$9.46
April 15, 2026
$8,903.70
$5,919.41
$5,692.37
$10,979.94
$9,071.49
$4,178.87
$1,902.04
2 670

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Table ES -2: Development Impact Fee Summary (TOD area)
Single Family
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Comm./Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
$2,998.98 $1,821.88
$2,009.53 $1,220.79
$1,861.93 $1,131.12
General
Gov't
rans-
portation
Residential Property (per unit)
$1,740.36
$1,166.17
$1,080.51
cape
$735.49 $963.70 $598.98 $0.00 $44.30
$492.83 $658.37 $1,225.17 $1,131.76 $39.52
$456.63 $834.36 $299.49 $0.00 $28.32
Non -Residential Property (per, 1,000 sq. ft or per hotel/motel room) $3,705.40 $2,251.03 $2,150.31 NA $2,425.69 $1,406.29 $4,169.82 $3,566.73 $2,166.79 $2,069.84 NA $830.12 $1,406.29 $1,427.00 $1,534.57 $932.25 $890.54 NA $381.66 $1,500.01 $656.09
$425.61 $258.56 $246.99 NA $619.14 $1,225.17 $1,064.32
Table ES -3: Quimby Fee Summary
� T
Residential Land Use from
2023 US Census Data
Impact Fee per
Dwelling Unit
(other than ADUs)
SFD and SFA
2-4 Plex MFA
5 Plex or greater MFA
Mobile Homes
$26,655
$26,576
$20,357
$16,547
$80.54
$57.33
$29.48
$19.20
$8,903.70
$7,944.13
$5,692.37
$16,189.08
$11,524.10 ,
$5,924.60
$3,858.99
B.2. Fee Amount for Accessory Dwelling Units
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66311.5, Accessory Dwelling Units ("ADU(s)") are exempt from incurring impact fees from local agencies if such unit is less than 750 square feet of interior livable space. If an ADU has more than 750 square feet of interior livable space, impact fees shall be charged proportionally in relation to the square footage of the primary residence.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
3 671

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

II INTRODUCTION

SECTION II

INTRODUCTION
To adequately plan for new development and identify the future facilities and costs associated with mitigating the direct and cumulative impacts of new developments, the City retained DTA to prepare an updated AB 1600 Fee Justification Study (the "Fee Study"). For this study, DTA updated all development impact fees based on updated development information and City facilities.

More specifically, the Fee Study is intended to comply with Section 66477 et seq. of the Government Code (Quimby Act for parks facilities for subdivisions less than 50 parcels) which was enacted by the State of California in 1965 and Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code (for police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities) which was enacted by the State of California in 1987, by identifying Future Facilities and determining the level of fees that may be imposed to pay the costs of the Future Facilities. Fee amounts have been determined to finance facilities at levels identified by the various City departments as necessary to meet the needs of new development.

As of the date of the study, this report meets all requirements of Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code. This report does not address, nor has DTA been asked to determine, whether any current or proposed development impact fees are valid under the U.S.

Constitution's Fifth Amendment Takings Clause. In Sheetz v. County of El Dorado (2025) U.S., the U.S. Supreme Court held that its decisions in Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n (1987) 483 U.S. 825 and Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) 512 U.S. 374 apply to legislatively imposed conditions on land -use permits. However, the Supreme Court left it to the California appellate court on remand to address the validity of the traffic impact fee at issue in the case and determine how to apply Nollan/Dolan in this context. Even though this report is in compliance with all requirements under Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code, DTA cannot predict how courts will resolve such issues in the future and is providing no services nor guarantees of any kind concerning the validity of any impact fees under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment Takings Clause.

The Future Facilities and associated construction costs are identified in the Needs List, which is included in Section V of the Fee Study. Under the development fee program, all new development may be required to pay its "fair share" of the cost of Future Facilities.

The police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities fees are calculated to fund the cost of facilities needed to meet the needs of new development.

Facilities for parks associated with a new subdivision with less than 50 parcels shall be funded through the impact fee pursuant to the Quimby Act as described further in Section V.D. herein. The steps followed in the Fee Study include:

1. Demographic Assumptions: Identify future growth that represents the increased facility demand.

2. Facility Needs and Costs: Identify Future Facilities required to support the new development and the costs of such facilities. Facilities costs and the Needs List are City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
4 672

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION II

INTRODUCTION
discussed in Section V. The police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities impact fees are based on the City's current Level of Service ("LOS") or on the City's list of needed facilities ("Needs List") as described further herein. For purposes of complying with AB 602, the Needs Lists shown herein are considered to be the CIP.

3. Cost Allocation: Allocate costs per Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU").

4. Fee Schedule: Calculate the fee per residential unit, or non-residential square foot, or in another specific unit of measurement.

This Fee Study uses a planning horizon of 2040 for all projections of demographic growth and the future facilities needed. To ensure that the proposed fee structure meets the nexus requirements of Section 66001 and ensure the fees are proportionate to the impacts generated by the various land uses, this Fee Study uses an Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method to fairly allocate costs to new development and determine the appropriate fee levels that will provide a source of funds to pay for the proposed facilities. A more detailed discussion regarding the EDU methodology can be found in Section IV(D).

Application of the EDU methodology depends upon reasonable choices of variables that adequately measure demand for respective facilities ("demand variable").

Table II -1 summarizes the demand variables used in this Fee Study.

Table II -1: Demand Variables
Police
Fire
General Government
Parks (AB1600)
Transportation
Streetscape
Sewer
Population and Employees
Population and Employees
Population and Employees
Population
Average Daily Trips
Average Daily Trips
Water Usage
Section V of this Fee Study provides detailed analyses of the Needs List for police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities, allocation of costs to new development, and calculation of fee structures for such facilities. As described in Section VI, an administrative component of 0.5% of the aggregate fee amount is added to pay for the City's overhead costs incurred in administering the Fee program.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
5 673

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

EGAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
The levy of impact fees is one authorized method of financing Future Facilities necessary to mitigate the impacts of new development. A fee is "a monetary exaction or a dedication, other than a tax or special assessment, which is required by a local agency of the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project..." (California Government Code, Section 66000).

A fee may be levied for each type of capital improvement required for new development.

The typical fee is paid prior to the beginning of construction of a dwelling unit or non- residential building. Fees are often levied at final map recordation, issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or, more commonly, at building permit issuance.

AB 1600, which created Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code, was enacted by the State of California in 1987 and is described in further detail in Section III.A below.

Section III.A applies to the fees calculated for police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities.

California Government Code Section 66477 (the "Quimby Act") is described in further detail in Section III.B below and applies to the fees calculated for parks facilities associated with subdivision maps.

Assembly Bill ("AB") 602 is described in further detail in Section III.0 below and applies to police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities.

A Government Code Section 66001
In 2006, Government Code Section 66001 was amended to clarify that a fee cannot include costs attributable to existing deficiencies but can fund costs used to maintain the existing level of service ("LOS") or meet an adopted level of service consistent with the general plan.

Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code thus requires that all public agencies satisfy the following requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of new development:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(1)]

2. Identify the use to which the fee will be put. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(2)]

3. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development on which the fee is to be imposed. [Government Code Section 66001(a)(3)]

4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is to be imposed.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
6 674

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
[Government Code Section 66001(a)(4)]

5. Discuss how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

This section presents these items as they relate to the imposition of the proposed fees in the City.

1. PURPOSE OF THE FEE [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(1)] New residential and non-residential development within the City will generate additional residents and employees requiring additional public facilities. Land for these facilities will have to be acquired, and public facilities and equipment will have to be expanded, constructed, or purchased to meet this increased demand.

It is the projected direct and cumulative effect of future residential and non- residential development that has required the preparation of this Fee Study.

Each new residential and non-residential property will contribute to the need for new police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape (TOD area only), and sewer facilities, and, as such, the proposed impact fee will be charged to all future development, irrespective of location, within the City.

While a portion of the City's future development might be characterized as "infill" development projects, these projects contribute to impacts on public facilities because they are an interactive component of a much greater universe of development located throughout the City. First, the residents associated with any new residential development and the employees associated with any non- residential development in the City have access to, and in fact, may regularly utilize and benefit from, the City's police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities. Second, these residents and employees may have chosen to purchase the specific piece of property in which they reside and/or work partially because of the police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities opportunities located nearby. Third, the availability of such facilities throughout the City has a growth -inducing impact, in that it enhances the City's reputation as a great place to live and work, thereby attracting new development, particularly non- residential development, that may have otherwise gone elsewhere. As a result, all development projects in the City contribute to the cumulative need for new police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities throughout the City.

The impact fees will be used to acquire, install, and construct public facilities identified on the Needs Lists, mitigating the direct and cumulative impacts of new development in the City.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
7 675

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

2. THE USE TO WHICH THE FEE IS TO BE PUT [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(2)]
The police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities fee will be used for the acquisition, installation, and construction of the public facilities identified on the Needs Lists for such fees, included in Section V of the Fee Study, and other appropriate costs to mitigate the direct and cumulative impacts of new development in the City. The fee will provide a source of revenue to the City to allow for the acquisition, installation, and construction of needed public facilities, which in turn will both preserve the quality of life in the City and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the existing and future residents and employees.

3. DETERMINE THAT THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE

FEE'S USE AND THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED (BENEFIT RELATIONSHIP) [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(3)]
As discussed in Section III.A, the projected direct and cumulative effect of future development has prompted the preparation of the Fee Study. Each development will contribute to the need for new public facilities due to increased usage of such public facilities. Furthermore, without this future development, the City would not need to construct many of the public facilities on the Needs List. The costs of such new facilities have been allocated to both existing and new development based on their level of benefit. Consequently, all new residential and non-residential development within the City, irrespective of location, contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities and creates the need for new public facilities to accommodate growth and the increased impact on such public facilities.

The police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities fees will be expended for the acquisition, installation, and construction of the public facilities identified on the Needs List for such fees and other authorized uses, as that is the purpose for which the fee is collected. These fees are intended to mitigate the impact of new development on City infrastructure. As previously stated, all new development directly impacts public facilities or contribute to the cumulative impact on public facilities. Moreover, this impact is generally equalized among all types of development because it is the result of increased demands for public facilities created by future residents and employees.

For the reasons above, there is a reasonable relationship between the design, acquisition, construction, and installation of the facilities on the Needs Lists for police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
8 676

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
facilities fees and new development.

4. DETERMINE HOW THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE

NEED FOR THE PUBLIC FACILITY AND THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED (IMPACT RELATIONSHIP) [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(4)]
As previously stated, all new development within the City, irrespective of location, contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities due to increased usage of such public facilities. Moreover, the police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities identified in Section V are specifically a function of the number of projected residents/employees within the City and do not reflect any unmet needs of existing development.

For the reasons presented herein, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities included on the Needs List and all new development within the City. Construction of the facilities included on the Needs List will mitigate the impacts of new development on City infrastructure.

S. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE AND THE COST OF

THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED ("ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY" RELATIONSHIP) [GOVERNMENT CODE 66001(A)]
This Fee Study demonstrates how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. As set forth above, all new construction in the City impacts police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities. Moreover, each individual development project and its related increase in population and/or employment, along with the cumulative impacts of all development in the City, will adversely impact existing facilities. Thus, imposition of the fee to finance Future Facilities is an efficient and practical method of permitting development to proceed in a responsible manner by mitigating the impact that new development will have on public facilities.

New development impacts facilities directly and cumulatively. Without any future development, the acquisition, construction, and/or installation of new facilities would not be necessary as existing City facilities are generally adequate.

Even new development located adjacent to existing facilities will utilize and benefit from the Future Facilities.

Based on the analyses contained in Section VII, the proposed fee amounts are roughly proportional to the impacts resulting from new development. Thus, City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
9 677

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the facilities.

B California Government Code Section 66477
The Quimby Act allows the City, by ordinance, to require the dedication of land or the payment of in -lieu fees, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition of subdivision map approval. The amount of the land to be dedicated or the fee to be imposed in lieu thereof is limited by statute and must be based on policies and standards contained in an adopted general or specific plan.

C Assembly Bill ("AB") 602
The impact fees for police, fire, general government, parks, transportation, streetscape, and sewer facilities included herein were circumscribed by the requirements of AB 602, which was approved by the California State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom in 2021. Among the significant impacts of AB 602 are the following:

On or after January 1, 2022, fee justification studies must identify the existing Level of Service ("LOS") for each public facility, determine the proposed new LOS, and (if the proposed new LOS is greater than the existing LOS) include an explanation of why the new LOS is necessary.

For housing development projects, nexus studies adopted after July 1, 2022, must calculate the fees based on the square footage of proposed units of the development unless the local agency demonstrates that another metric is more appropriate.

The bill authorizes any member of the public, including an applicant for a development project, to submit evidence that the city, county, or other local agency had failed to comply with the Mitigation Fee Act. The bill requires the legislative body of the city, county, or other local agency to consider any timely submitted evidence and authorize the legislative body to change or adjust the proposed fee or fee increase as specified.

Large jurisdictions (county population greater than 250,000) and cities within those counties must adopt a capital improvement plan ("CIP") as part of the nexus study.

Nexus studies shall be updated at least every 8 years from January 1, 2023.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
10 678

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

IV DEMOGRAPHICS

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
To determine the public facilities needed to serve new development and establish fee amounts to fund such public facilities, DTA worked closely with the City to establish projections of future population, employees, and development within the City. The City of Placentia is primarily built -out, and very little future growth will occur on land that is currently undeveloped. Future development will primarily result from intensification and/or redevelopment of existing land uses. For purposes of projecting future population and employment growth, the City categorizes developable land uses as residential and non- residential property. Residential property is further categorized into Single Family Detached, Single Family Attached, Multi -Family, Mobile Home, and Accessory Dwelling Unit ("ADU") uses. Non-residential property is further categorized into Commercial/Retail, Hotel/Motel, Office, and Industrial uses. Based on these designations, DTA established fees for the following eight (8) land use categories to acknowledge the difference in impacts resulting from various land uses and to make the resulting fee program implementable. A summary of the land use classes utilized in this fee study is included in the table below.

However, not all fees will apply to all land uses.

Table IV -1: Summary of Land Use Categories
Land Use Classification Fee Study
Single -Family Residential Units
Multi -Family Units
Mobile Home Units
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Includes residential buildings with one or more units including, but not limited to, detached homes and attached homes, townhomes and condominiums, that share a wall and have a unique Assessor Parcel Number for each residential unit.

Includes residential buildings with two or more units including, but not limited to, apartments and assisted -living facility units, for which such units are located on the same Assessor Parcel Number.

Includes homes for residential occupancy in vehicles that require a permit to be moved on a highway, other than a motor vehicle designed or used for human habitation and for being drawn by another vehicle.

Includes units that provide complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons with provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the primary residence.

Includes, but is not limited to, buildings used for the following:
• General Commercial;
• Retail;
• Private school; and
• Other similar non-residential occupancy
City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
11 679

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
Land Use • ' • n Fee Study 1 Definition
Office
Industrial
Includes, but is not limited to, building space used for the following:
• General business services
• Professional office;
• Medical office; and
• Other similar non-residential occupancy
Includes, but is riot limited to, building space used for the following:
• Manufacturing;
• Fabrication;
• Assembly;
• Storage;
• Distribution; and
• Other similar non-residential occupancy
Hotel/Motel Includes Hotel/Motel rooms.

The time horizon used for all fees is through the year 2040 which is the City's current expected buildout year. Demographics projections were developed by the City based on internal City planning data and GIS database as well as other sources including the following:
• Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). (2024). 2024-2025 RTP/SCS: Placentia Data/Map Book.
• SCAG. (2024). Demographics & Growth Forecast Technical Report. • California Department of Finance (DOF). (2025). E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates.
• California Department of Housing & Community Development (NCD). (2024). Annual Progress Report (APR) Dashboard.
• City of Placentia. (2021). General Plan / OCP.

In addition, the City has designated a roughly 37 -acre site within the City as a Transit - Oriented Development ("TOD") area. The TOD area is a revitalization zone centered around the future Placentia Metrolink Station, encouraging a mixed-use, walkable development with multi -family housing, retail, and commercial spaces. Property within the TOD area is identified in the tables below and on the map included in Exhibit A herein.

An overview of City development is presented as follows:
• Section A summarizes the existing development in the City. • Section B below summarizes the future development in the City through the year 2040.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
12 680

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
Section C below summarizes the EDU methodology used in all fee calculations.

A Existing Development within the City (as of January 1, 2025) A.1 Residential Development (applies to all fees except Quimby Fee) According to information provided by the City, there were 53,028 residents residing in 18,608 residential units within the City as of January 1, 2025. The table below summarizes the existing residential development within the City.

Table IV -2: Estimated Existing Residential Development Existing Number
Residential Property of Residents
(2025)
Existing Number o
Units (2025
Existing Residents per Unit
(2025)
Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
40,556 residents
9,705 residents
1,476 residents
87 residents
13,238 units
3,896 units
776 units
65 units

3.06 residents per unit

2.49 residents per unit

1.90 residents per unit

1.34 residents per unit
Subtotal, Non-TOD Area
51,824 residents
17,975 units

2.88 residents per unit
TOD Area
Multi -Family
1,204 residents
633 units 1.90 residents per unit
Subtotal, TOD Area
1,204 residents
633 units 1.90 residents per unit
Total 53,028 residents
18,608 units 2.85 residents per unit
A.2 Residential Development (applies to Quimby Fee)
The Quimby Fee is calculated pursuant to the methodology described in the Quimby Act. Therefore, the existing development information used for the Quimby Fee is based on 51,760 existing residents and 16,979 existing residential units as indicated in the 2023 United States Census Data.

A.3 Non -Residential Development
According to information provided by the City, there were 1.7 million square feet of existing Commercial/Retail development, 2.7 million square feet of existing Office development, 5.0 million square feet of existing Industrial development, and 460 existing Hotel/Motel rooms within the City.

In terms of employees, the City is estimated to have 5,431 existing Commercial/Retail employees, 7,911 existing Office employees, 7,191 existing Industrial employees, and 200 existing Hotel/Motel employees within the City.

The table below summarizes the existing non-residential development within the City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
13 681

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
City.

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
Table IV -3: Estimated Existing Non -Residential Development Non -Residential Propert
xisting Employees
(2025)
Existing Buildinal
Square Feet or
Rooms (2025)
r Employees per 1,000
Sq. Ft. or per Room
Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
4,914 employees
7,264 employees
6,759 employees
200 employees
1,641,263 sq. ft.
2,580,779 sq. ft.
4,739,812 sq. ft.
460 rooms

2.99 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

2.81 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

1.43 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

0.43 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

Subtotal, Non-TOD Area 19,137 employees
8,961,854 sq. ft.

2.14 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
517 employees
647 employees
432 employees
0 employees
93,975 sq. ft.
135,416 sq. ft.
270,767 sq. ft.
0 rooms

5.50 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

4.78 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

1.59 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

NA.

Subtotal, TOD Area
1,596 employees 500,158 sq. ft. I 3.19 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

Total 20,733 employees 9,462,012 sq. ft. I NA
B Future Development within the City (2025-2040)
This section describes development through 2040. The fee calculations for the various City departments (i.e., police, fire, etc.) as presented herein rely on development information related to population, residential dwelling units, employees, and non-residential building square feet as described below.

B.1 Residential Development (2025-2040)
The City estimates that there will be a population increase from 2025 through 2040 of 8,716 new residents. To accommodate this population growth, the City expects 3,580 new dwelling units in the future.

The table below summarizes the future demographics for residential property from 2025 through 2040.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
14 682

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
Table IV -4: Estimated Future Residential Development (2025-2040) Residential Property
Future Nu
of Resident Future Number o Future Residents per Unit
(2025 to 2040 its (2025 to 2040 (2025 to 2040)
Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
4,672 residents
1,121 residents
171 residents
301 residents
1,525 units
450 units
90 units
225 units

3.06 residents per unit

2.49 residents per unit

1.90 residents per unit

1.34 residents per unit
Subtotal, Non-TOD Area
6,265 residents
2,290 units

2.74 residents per unit
TOD Area
Multi -Family
Subtotal, TOD Area
2,451 residents 1,290 units

1.90 residents per unit
2,451 residents
1,290 units

1.90 residents per unit
Total 8,716 residents
3,580 units 2.43 residents per unit
B.2 Non -Residential Development (2025-2040)
The City estimates that there will be an increase in non-residential development of 122,600 building square feet of new Commercial/Retail space, 35,600 building square feet of new Office space, 225,000 building square feet of new Industrial development, and 500 new Hotel/Motel rooms.

The City estimates that this development growth will create additional new employees from 2025 through 2040 of 464 new Commercial/Retail employees, 130 new Office employees, 357 new Industrial employees, and 217 new Hotel/Motel employees.

The table below summarizes the future demographics for the non-residential land uses from 2025 through 2040.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
15 683

uture Building
LNoRetia10Pe1Square Feet or
Rooms (2025 to
2040)
dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
Table IV -5: Estimated Future Non -Residential Development (2025 through Year 2040) Future Employees
(2025 to 2040)
IEmployees per 1,000
Sq. Ft. or per Room
Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
72,600 sq. ft.
20,600 sq. ft.
225,000 sq. ft.
350 rooms
189 employees
58 employees
357 employees
152 employees

2.60 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

2.81 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

1.59 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

0.43 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

Subtotal, Non-TOD Area
318,200 sq. ft.
756 employees

2.38 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
50,000 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft.
0 sq. ft.
150 rooms
275 employees
72 employees
0 employees
65 employees

5.50 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

4.78 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

0.43 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

Subtotal, TOD Area
65,000 sq. ft.
412 employees

6.34 emp./1,000 sq. ft.

Total 383,200 sq. ft. 1,168 employees
C Future Reduction in Development within the City (2025-2040) This section describes the future reduction of industrial development through 2040. The City estimates that 162,460 building square feet of existing industrial development in the TOD area will be demolished through 2040. This will result in a decrease of approximately 259 employees in the TOD area through 2040. This reduction in industrial development will coincide with the development of new multi -family residential units in the TOD area during roughly the same time frame. These new multi -family residential units in the TOD area are already accounted for in the future development information described in Section B above.

NA
D Equivalent Dwelling Unit Projections
Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDUs") are a means of quantifying different land uses in terms of their equivalence to a residential dwelling unit, where equivalence is measured in terms of potential infrastructure use or benefit for each type of public facility.

California Government Code g66001(4)(b) requires that there be a "...reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility, or portion of the public facility, attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed." This study uses an EDU methodology to ensure that a reasonable relationship is maintained within the proposed fee structure. This approach uses, for given land uses, a method of comparison of that land use to a baseline land use using a common demand variable. A demand variable City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
16 684

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
is a measurable factor directly related to the size or quantity of the public facility. In other words, the new development generates demand, and the demand variables are an effort to quantify the demand for each land use.

As stated earlier, fees are calculated for various land use categories. Each land use has different levels of demand for the new facilities as quantified by the demand variable most closely related to determining the size and cost of the facility in question. For instance, additional residents and employees resulting from growth in the various land uses will generate demand for expanded police facilities in the existing police department system; therefore, population and employee increase would be considered a reasonable common demand variable and the population growth from a new residence and employees per 1,000 building square feet would be used as the baseline.

The table below shows the fee category, service factor, applicable land uses, and the timeframe for calculating the EDUs.

Table IV -6: Service Factor
ervice Factor Fee Charged to
Land Uses
Police
Fire
General Government
Parks
Sewer
Transportation
Streetscape
Population and employees
they directly contribute to
Residents and Employees Served
Residents and Employees Served
Residents and Employees Served
Residents Served
Sewer Generation
Average Daily Trips
Average Daily Trips
Res.

Res.

Res.
and Non -Res.
and Non -Res.
and Non -Res.

Res. Only
and Non -Res.
and Non -Res.
and Non -Res.
serve as key indicators of demand for public services because and rely on the availability of such services. For instance, the number of residents and employees in a community influences the need for essential services such as public safety. Changes in the population of residents and employees reflect shifts in service needs, making them crucial for forecasting and planning public services.

D.1 EDU Factors
EDU factors for each land use of existing development are shown in Table IV -7 below (for police, fire, general government, and parks facilities). The EDUs for sewer and transportation, and streetscape facilities are described in the fee calculation sections herein.

All EDU factors are calculated assuming that 1.00 EDU is equivalent to one future single family residential unit with an average future population density of 3.06 residents per unit as provided by the City.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
17 685

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
Table IV -7: EDU Factors for Existing Development (2025) Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
TOD Area
Multi -Family

3.06 2.49

1.90 1.34

1.90 1.000

0.813

0.621

0.437

0.621
Non -Residential Property
Non-TOD Area
Existing Employees
per 1,000 Non -Res.

SF / Room
Existing EDUs
per 1,000 Non -
Res. SF / Room
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel

2.99 2.81

1.43 0.43

5.50 4.78

1.59 NA

0.977

0.919

0.465

0.142

1.796

1.561

0.520
NA
Applying the EDU factors shown in the table above to the existing development results in 24,076 total existing EDUs, as shown in Table IV -8 below. For example, for existing multi -family residential property in the non-TOD area, there are 3,168 EDUs which is based on 0.813 EDUs per unit multiplied by 3,896 existing units.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
18 686

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
Table IV -8: Total EDUs for Existing Development (2025) Residential Property
Existing EDUs Total
Units per Unit Existing
EDUs
Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Subtotal, Non-TOD Area
TOD Area
Multi -Family
13,238 units
3,896 units
776 units
65 units
17,975 units
633 units

1.000

0.813

0.621

0.437

0.621
13,238
3,168
482
28 16,916
393
Subtotal, TOD Area
633 units

0.621
393
Subtotal Residential
18,608 units
NA
1Z309
Non -Residential Property
Rooms/Sq. Ft.

Existing EDUs
per 1,000 Sq.

Ft./Room
Total
Existing
EDUs
Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
1,641,263 sq. ft.
2,580,779 sq. ft.
4,739,812 sq. ft.
460 rooms

0.977

0.919

0.465

0.142
1,604
2,371
2,206
65 Subtotal, Non-TOD Area
8,961,854 sq. ft.
6,247
TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Subtotal, TOD Area
Subtotal Non -Residential
Total
93,975 sq. ft.
135,416 sq. ft.
270,767 sq. ft.
0 rooms
500,158 sq. ft.
9,462, 012 sq. ft.

N/A

1.796

1.561

0.520
NA
169
211
141
NA
521
NA 6,767
N/A 24,076
EDU factors for each land use of future development are calculated as shown in the table below.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
19 687

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
Table IV -9: EDU Factors for Future Development (2025-2040) Residential Property
Future Residents Future EDUs per
per Unit Unit
Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
TOD Area
Multi -Family

3.06 2.49

1.90 1.34

1.90 1.000

0.813

0.621

0.437

0.621
Non -Residential Property
Future Employee uture EDUs per
per 1,000 Non -Res. 1,000 Non -Res.

SF / Room SF / Room
Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel

2.60 2.82

1.59 0.43

5.50 4.78
NA

0.43 0.850

0.919

0.518

0.142

1.796

1.561
NA

0.142
Applying the EDU factors shown in the table above to the future development results in 3,142 future EDUs, as shown in Table IV -10 below. For example, for future multi- family residential property in the non-TOD area, there are 366 EDUs which is based on 0.813 EDUs per unit multiplied by 450 future units.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
20 688

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
Table IV -10: Future Development (2025-2040)

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
Residential Property
Units
Future EDUs
per Unit
Total
Future
EDUs
Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Subtotal, Non-TOD Area
TOD Area
Multi -Family
Subtotal, TOD Area
Subtotal Residential
1,525 units
450 units
90 units
225 units
2,290 units
1,290 units
1,290 units

1.000

0.813

0.621

0.437
NA

0.620
1,525
366
56 98
2,045
800

0.620
800
3,580 units
NA
2,845
Non -Residential Property
Sq. Ft./Rooms
Future EDUs
per 1,000 Sq.

Ft./Room
Total
Future
EDUs
Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
72,600 sq. ft.
20,600 sq. ft.
225,000 sq. ft.
350 rooms

0.850

0.919

0.518

0.142
62 19
117
50 Subtotal, Non-TOD Area
318,200
NA
247
TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Subtotal, TOD Area
Subtotal Non -Residential
Total
50,000 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft.
(162,460 sq. ft.)
150 rooms
(97,460 sq. ft.)
220,740 sq. ft.

N/A

1.796

1.561

0.520

0.142
NA
NA
N/A
90 23
(85)
21 50
297
3,142
Table IV -11 below shows the total development and EDUs in Year 2040. This is equal to the sum of the existing development/EDUs from Table IV -8 and future City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
21 689

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

DEMOGRAPHICS
development/EDUs from Table IV -10 less the reduction in industrial development from Section IV.0 above.

Table IV -11: Total Estimated Development (2040)
Residential Property
L.&
Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Subtotal, Non-TOD Area
TOD Area
Multi -Family
Subtotal, TOD Area
Subtotal Residential
14,763 units
4,346 units
866 units
290 units
20,265 units
1,923 units
1,923 units

1.000 14,763

0.813 3,534

0.621 538

0.437 127
NA 18,961

0.620
NA
22,188 units
NA
1,193
1,193
20,154
EDUs per
Non -Residential Property Rooms/Sq. Ft. 1,000 Sq.

Ft./Room
Total
EDUs
Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Subtotal, Non-TOD Area
TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Subtotal, TOD Area
Subtotal Non -Residential
Total
1,713,863 sq. ft.
2,601,379 sq. ft.
4,964,812 sq. ft.
810 rooms
9,280,054 sq. ft.

0.972 1,666

0.919 2,390

0.468 2,323

0.142 115
NA 6,493
143,975 sq. ft. 1.796 259
150,416 sq. ft. 1.561 235
108,307 sq. ft. 0.520 56 1
150 rooms 0.142 21
402,967 sq. ft. NA 571
9,682,751 sq. ft. NA Z064
N/A N/A 27,218
City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
22 690

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

V FEE CALCULATIONS

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE
The following sections present the reasonable relationship for benefit, impact, and rough proportionality tests for each fee element (i.e., police facilities, fire facilities, etc.) and the analysis undertaken to apportion costs for each type of public facility on the Needs List.

Detailed fee calculation worksheets for each type of facility are included in Appendix B.

A Police Facilities
The Police Facilities will serve the residents and employees of Placentia by providing public safety services. The Fee Study includes a component for new police facilities, equipment, and vehicles/aircraft that will be required as a direct result of new development within the City. Table V -A1 below illustrates how the police fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 with regard to the use of the fee, the type of development funded or partially funded by the fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and the proportionality requirements.

Table V -A1: Police Fee - AB 1600 Compliance
AB 1600 Code
Section
Description Justification
66001(a)(1)
66001(a) (2)
66001(a) (3)
Identify the purpose of the
Fee.

Identify the use to which
the fee is to be put.

Demonstrate how there is
a reasonable relationship
between the fee's use and
the type of development
project on which the fee is
imposed.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct various police facilities and acquire
equipment and vehicles to mitigate the impacts of
new residential and non-residential development on
the City's Police facilities.

Fees will be used to pay for the
expansion/construction/acquisition of police
facilities, equipment, and vehicles that will be
required as a direct result of new development
within the City.

New residential and non-residential development in
the City will generate additional residents and
employees who will generate service calls, increasing
the need for trained police personnel. Buildings,
equipment, and vehicles used to provide these
services will have to be expanded, constructed,
and/or purchased in order to meet this increased
demand.

April 15, 2026
23 691

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE
AB 1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(a) (4)
66001(b)
Demonstrate how there is
a reasonable relationship
between the need for the
public facilities and type
of development project on
which the fee is imposed.

Demonstrate how there is
a reasonable relationship
between the amount of
the fee and the cost of the
public facility.

The additional residents and employees from new
developments will impact demand for police facilities.

New police facilities are needed to mitigate the
impacts of the additional residents and employees in
order to ensure that the goal of the City's General
Plan in maintaining adequate levels of police service
throughout the community is met. If additional
police facilities are not constructed and equipment
and vehicles are not acquired, then overall public
safety in the City will suffer.

The police fee is based on the cost of providing new
facilities, equipment, and vehicles that will be
required as a direct result of new development
within the City.

A.1 Existing Facilities
The City of Placentia provided a detailed breakdown of the existing police facilities.

The City currently has one police station facility totaling 12,315 square feet of building space, 25 vehicles, 170 surveillance cameras, and 11 license plate readers.

See the table below for a summary of the existing inventory.

Table V -A2: Existing Police Facilities
Placentia Police Station (401 E. Chapman)
Vehicles Category
Patrol Cars
Equipment
Surveillance Cameras
License Plate Readers
A.2 Proposed Facilities and Costs
To determine the proposed facilities, the City must determine the demand for infrastructure created by new development. Residents and businesses benefit from law enforcement services in three ways: (i) directly, (ii) indirectly, and (iii) through standby availability. Direct services are those where a resident or business owner requires a direct response, usually as a result of being the victim of a crime. Direct service results in the form of a law enforcement officer contacting the victim.

Indirect benefits, such as crime prevention programs, proactive patrol time, and Building Size (Sq. Ft.)
12,315
25 170
11 City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
24 692

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE
other law enforcement services that serve all businesses, citizens, and visitors, are impossible to calculate for a specific boundary. An example of an indirect benefit would be the apprehension of a burglar in a particular neighborhood. Had the burglar not been apprehended and arrested, he/she may have broken into additional homes in the neighborhood. Most residents and businesses may go for many years before ever requiring a call -for -service. However, these fortunate residents and businesses still benefit from law enforcement services, if in no other way than by the knowledge that a law enforcement officer is available through adequate planned standby to respond when needed.

The addition of new residential units and new businesses will increase the demand for enforcement service level by creating more direct calls -for -service, more areas requiring preventive patrol, and, in general, will create more opportunities for crimes to be committed. Demands will be made upon the previously listed assets in Table V -A2 above in a direct, indirect, or standby form. Therefore, such assets would need to be expanded to ensure that the current levels of service are maintained.

Table V -A3 below identifies the facilities, equipment, and vehicles proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the collection of Police fees. The quantity and costs are based on estimates provided by the City.

Table V -A3: Police Facilities Needs List
WPp=1" Land
olice Facility Acquisition
(Acres)
Building Size Total Costs
(Sq. Ft.)
New Police Station
New Police Sub -Station (building acquired
from existing retail property owner)
Total

2.0 0.0

2.0 13,000
10,000
23,000
$40,032,000
$543,000
$40,575,000
Costs
Patrol Cars
Mobile Command Vehicle
Total
5 1
NA
$500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
Equipment Sets
Surveillance Cameras
License Plate Readers
Total
43 4
NA
Grand Total
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance)
Net Facilities Cost
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
$225,000
$100,000
$325,000
$44,400, 000
($245,795)
$44,154,205
April 15, 2026
25 693

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE
For purposes of complying with AB 602, the needs list shown above is derived from the Capital Improvement Plan for Development Impact Fees (the "CIP") expected to be approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026, in connection with this Fee Study. Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is equal to the City's existing LOS.

Note that the police impact fee calculated herein for residential property is on a per-unit basis. This is due to the fact that service demand for police facilities correlates closely to the number of residents in a home. Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresponds to additional residents in the home. Therefore, a uniform per-unit fee best reflects the actual impact a new home will have on local police services.

A.3 EDUs
For Police facilities, the development of the property into residential and non- residential uses generates residents and employees, resulting in increased service calls made to the Police Department.

The table below summarizes the existing and future development and corresponding EDUs, as described in Section IV (Demographics) herein:

Table V -A4: Total EDUs
Type of Development Existing EDUs Future EDUs Total EDUs (20252 (2025-2040)
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Total
Percentage of Total EDUs
A.4 Allocation of Costs
13,238
3,561
482
28 1,773
2,582
2,347
65 24,076

88.46%
1,525
1,166
56 98
151
42 32
71 3,142

11.54%
14,763
4,727
538
126
1,924
2,625
2,379
136
27,218
100.00%
The total cost of $44,154,205, as shown in Table V -A3 above, is for police facilities needed to serve existing and new developments. Described below are more details regarding each of the facilities and the methodology used to allocate the costs (i.e., based on the share of total EDUs in 2040, credit for existing development, etc.).

Police Stations: Any new development within the City would impact the ability of police officers to provide adequate service and would increase police department response times. Currently, the City uses a five (5) -minute travel response time to City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
26 694

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE
service calls as one of the benchmarks for customer service. Additional stations, land, as well as equipment for such facilities will be needed to maintain the City's existing response time. It is expected that the number of City-wide calls for service will increase in proportion to future growth.

Table V -A5 summarizes the allocation of police station costs to existing and new development. The City currently has 12,315 square feet of existing police station buildings. Based on the locations of existing and new development, additional police facilities will be needed at various locations. The City has determined 23,000 new building square feet are needed to adequately serve both existing and new development, bringing the total to 35,315 square feet.

Therefore, after providing a credit to existing development for the existing 12,315 square feet, 82% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 18% will be allocated to new development as shown below.

Table V -A5: Allocation of Police Facilities Costs
Percentage
Type of Development EDUs of Total
EDUs
111Fotaill- -1111�
Facilities Sq. Ft. Credit Building Percentag Facility
for ExistingS . Ft. Net of Costs 1 Costs
Sq. Ft. in q
2040 Development of Credit Allocated Allocated
Existing Development 24,076
88% 31,239 (12,315) 18,924 82% $33,166,114
Future Development 3,142 12% 4,076 0 4,076 18% $7,163,092 Total 27,218 100% 35,315 (12,315) 23,000 100% $40,329,206 Vehicles: Table V -A6 summarizes the allocation of vehicle costs to existing and new development. The City currently has 25 existing police vehicles. The City has determined five new police vehicles and one new mobile command vehicle are needed to adequately serve both existing and new development, bringing the total to 31 vehicles.

Therefore, after providing a credit to existing development for the existing 25 vehicles, 40% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 60% will be allocated to new development as shown below.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
27 695

dta
www.FinanceDTA.co/
m

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE
Table V -A6: Allocation of Police Vehicle Costs
Percentage Total
Type of Development EDUs of Total Vehicles in
EDUs 2040
Vehicles
Credit for
Existing
Development
Vehicles Percentage Facility
Net of of Costs Costs
Credit Allocated Allocated
Existing Development 24,076 88%

27.42 (25) 2.42 40% $1,412,599
Future Development 3,142 12% 3.58
0 3.58 60% $2,087,401
Total 27,218 100% 31.00 (25) 6.00 100% $3,500,000
• Surveillance Cameras: Table V -A7 summarizes the allocation of surveillance camera costs to existing and new development. The City currently has 170 existing surveillance cameras. The City has determined 43 new surveillance cameras are needed to adequately serve both existing and new development, bringing the total to 213 new cameras.

Therefore, after providing a credit to existing development for the existing 170 cameras, 43% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 57% will be allocated to new development as shown below.

Table V -A7: Allocation of Police Surveillance Camera Costs Type of
Development
Percentage Total
EDUs of Total Cameras
EDUs in 2040
Vehicles
Credit for
Existing
Development
Vehicles Percentage Facility
Net of of Costs Costs
Credit Allocated Allocated
Existing Development 24,076 88% 188.41
(170)

18.41 43%
$96,347
Future Development 3,142 12% 24.59 0 24.59 57% $128,653 Total 27,218 100% 213.00 (170) 43.00 100% $225,000
• License Plate Readers ("LPR'): Table V -A8 summarizes the allocation of license plate reader costs to existing and new development. The City currently has 11 existing LPRs. The City has determined four new LPRs are needed to adequately serve both existing and new development, bringing the total to 15 new LPRs.

Therefore, after providing a credit to existing development for the existing 11 cameras, 57% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 43% will be allocated to new development as shown below.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
28 696

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE
Table V -A8: Allocation of License Plate Reader Costs
Type of
Development
Percentage Total LPRs Credit for
EDUs of Total LPRs in Existing
EDUs 2040 Development
LPRs Net
of Credit
Percentage Facility
of Costs Costs
Allocated Allocated
Existing Development 24,076 88% 13.27
Future Development 3,142
12%

1.73 0

2.27 57%
$56,713

1.73 43% $43,287
Total 27,218 100% 15.00 (11) 4.00 100% $100,000
• Total Facilities Costs: The table below shows the total facilities costs allocated to new and existing development.

Table V -A9: Total Costs
New Facility
Cost Allocated Cost Allocated 1111-
to Existing to Future Total Costs
Development Development
Building Sq. Ft.

Vehicles
Surveillance Cameras
License Plate Readers
$33,166,114
$1,412,599
$96,347
$56,713
Total $34,731,773
$7,163,092
$2,087,401
$128,653
$43,287
$9,422,433
$40,329,206
$3,500,000
$225,000
$100,000
$44,154,206
A.5 Proposed Fee Amount
The Fee per EDU was calculated by dividing the costs allocated to future development by the number of future EDUs as shown in the table below.

Table V -A10: Cost per EDU
Type of Development7
Future Facility Costs Total Cost
EDUs Allocated Per EDU
Future Development
3,142 $9,422,433 $2,998.98
See Table V -A11 for the fee amount for each land use based on the cost per EDU as calculated above.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
29 697

RimLand Use Type
www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
Table V -A11: Proposed Police Fees

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

POLICE FEE
Number of Futur —bevelopment Impact a Cost Financed
Units / 1,000 Sq. Ft.per Unit / 1,000 Sq. Ft. by Fees
/ Room - Zoo f
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Total
1,525
1,740
90 225
123
36 225
500
N/A
$2,998.98
$2,009.53
$1,861.93
$1,310.22
$3,705.40
$3,566.73
$1,534.57
$425.61
N/A
Estimated Credit Provided to Developer for Previously Mitigated Development Cost Allocated to New Development
Cost Allocated to Existing Development
Total Cost of Police Facilities
$4, 573,445
$3,496,581
$167,574
$294,800
$454,283
$126,976
$345,278
$212,805
$9,671,742
($249,307)
$9,422,433
$34,731,772
$44,154,205
Based on the development projections included in Appendix A, the fee amount presented in Table V -A11 above is expected to finance 22% of the facilities needed.

Also, the estimated credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects. This amount is subject to change.

The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelopment is subject to.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 66311.5, ADUs are exempt from incurring impact fees from local agencies if such unit is less than 750 square feet. If an ADU has more than 750 square feet of interior livable space, the impact fees will not be charged as shown above but shall be charged proportionally in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.

Please see the fee model included herein as Appendix B.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
30 698

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
B Fire Facilities

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE
The Fire Facilities will serve the residents and employees of Placentia by providing fire protection services. The Fee Study includes a component for new fire facilities, equipment, and vehicles that will be required as a direct result of new development within the City.

Table V -B1 below illustrates how the fire fee will meet the requirements of AB1600 with regard to the use of the fee, the type of development funded or partially funded by the fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities, and the proportionality requirements.

Table V -B1: Fire Fee AB 1600 Compliance
AB 1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(a) (1)
66001(a) (2)
Identify the purpose of
the Fee.

Identify the use to
which the fee is to be
put.

Demonstrate how there
is a reasonable
relationship between
66001(a)(3) the fee's use and the
type of development
project on which the
fee is imposed.
66001(a) (4)
Demonstrate how there
is a reasonable
relationship between
the need for the public
facilities and the type of
development project on
which the fee is
imposed.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct various Fire facilities and acquire
equipment and vehicles that will mitigate the
impacts of new residential and non-residential
development on the City's Fire facilities.

Fees will be used to pay for the
expansion/construction/acquisition of Fire
facilities, equipment, and vehicles that will be
needed as a direct result of new development in
the City.

New residential and non-residential development
in the City will generate additional residents and
employees who will in turn generate service calls
increasing the need for trained Fire personnel.

Buildings, equipment, and vehicles used to provide
these services will have to be expanded,
constructed, or purchased to meet this increased
demand.

The additional residents and employees from new
development will impact the demand for Fire
facilities. New Fire facilities are needed to mitigate
the impacts of the additional residents and
employees. If additional Fire facilities are not
constructed and equipment and vehicles are not
acquired, then overall public safety in the City will
suffer.

April 15, 2026
31 699

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
66001(b)
B.1
Demonstrate how there
is a reasonable
relationship between
the amount of the fee
and the cost of the
public facility.

Existing Facilities

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE
The Fire fee is based on the cost of providing new
facilities, equipment, and vehicles that will be
needed as a direct result of new development in
the City.

The City of Placentia provided a detailed breakdown of the existing fire and rescue facilities. The City currently has three Fire station facilities totaling 12,639 building square feet and three vehicles. See the table below for a summary of the existing inventory.

Table V -B2: Existing Fire Facilities
ility
Building Siz
Fire Station 1 (110 S. Bradford Ave.)
Fire Station 2 (1530 Valencia Ave.)
Fire Admin Headquarters (120 S. Bradford Ave.)
Total
3,500
6,039
3,100
12,639
Fire Vehicles
Vehicles
Primary Engine at Station 1
Primary Truck at Station 2
Reserve Engine at Station 2
Total
1 1
1 3
B.2 Proposed Facilities and Costs
To determine the proposed facilities, the City must determine the demand for infrastructure created by new development. All new developments in the City will impact its current ability to respond to fire, rescue, and medical calls -for -service. The effect is twofold. Initially, each new residence and business will create, on average, additional residents and employees, increasing the likelihood of simultaneous (and thus competing) calls -for -service. Additionally, as development spreads further from existing stations, the distances (and thus response times) will increase, taking the existing engine companies out -of -service for greater periods of time.

The capacity of any fire station is finite and will reach practical limits (through call frequency and total incident time). When that capacity is exceeded, the level of service afforded to existing development will be reduced. In other words, if development continues without an increase in the number of fire stations, the existing stations would be overwhelmed in terms of calls -for -service from residents and employees, increasing the possibility of a greater number of simultaneous calls - City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
32 700

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE
for -service. Additional demands will be made upon the previously listed assets in Table V -B2 above, and therefore, such assets will need to be expanded.

Table V -B3 below identifies the facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part by the collection of Fire fees. The quantity and costs are based on estimates provided by the City.

Table V -B3: Needs List
Fire Facility/Buildings
Land Building Size
Acquisition (Sq. Ft.)
(Acres)
Total Costs
New Fire Station 3
Equipment for Station 3
Total

1.6 0

1.6 10,000
0 10,000
$21,015,040
$1,000,000
$22,015,040
mil= -SIM
Truck for Station 3
1 Grand Total
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance)
$2,000,000
$24,015,040
($67,199)
et Facilities Cost $23,947,841
For purposes of complying with AB 602, the needs list shown above is derived from the Capital Improvement Plan for Development Impact Fees (the "CIP") expected to be approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026, in connection with this Fee Study. Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is equal to the City's existing LOS.

Note that the fire impact fee calculated herein for residential property is on a per-unit basis.

This is due to the fact that service demand for fire facilities correlates closely to the number of residents in a home. Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresponds to additional residents in the home.

Therefore, a uniform per-unit fee best reflects the actual impact a new home will have on local fire services.

B.3 EDUs
For Fire facilities, the development of property into residential and non-residential uses generates residents and employees resulting in increased service calls made to the Fire Department.

Table V -B4 below summarizes the existing and future development and corresponding EDUs, as described in Section IV (Demographics) herein:

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
33 701

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
Table V -B4: Total EDUs

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE
Type of Development
Exist
(2025)
Future
(2025-2040
Total ED
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Total
Percentage of Total EDUs
B.4 Allocation of Costs
13,238
3,561
482
28 1,773
2,582
2,347
65 24,076

88.46%
1,525
1,166
56 98
151
42 32
71 3,142

11.54%
14,763
4,727
538
126
1,924
2,625
2,379
136
27,218
100.00% 1
The total cost of $23,947,841, as shown in Table V -B3 above, is for Fire facilities needed to serve both existing and new development. Described below are more details regarding each of the facilities and the methodology used to allocate the costs (i.e., based on the share of total EDUs in 2040, credit for existing development, etc.). • Fire Stations: Any new development within the City would impact the ability of fire personnel to provide adequate service and would increase fire department response times. Currently, the City uses a four (4) -minute travel response time to emergencies as one of the benchmarks for customer service. Additional stations, land, as well as equipment for such facilities will be needed to maintain the City's existing response time. It is expected that the number of City-wide calls for service will increase in proportion to future growth.

Table V -B5 summarizes the allocation of fire station costs to existing and new development. The City currently has 12,639 square feet of existing fire station buildings. Based on the locations of existing and new development, additional fire facilities will be needed. The City has determined 10,000 new building square feet are needed to adequately serve both existing and new development, bringing the total to 22,639 square feet.

Therefore, after providing a credit to existing development for the existing 12,639 square feet, 75% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 25% will be allocated to new development as shown below.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
34 702

dta
www.FinanceDTA.co/
m

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE
Table V -B5: Allocation of Fire Facilities Costs
Type of
Development
Percentage Total Sq. Ft. Credit Building Percentage
EDUs of Total Facilities Sq. for Existing Sq. Ft. Net of Costs EDUs lin 2040 Development of Credit Allocated
Facility Costs
Allocated
Existing
Development
Future
Development
24,076 88%
19,760
3,142 12% 2,879
(12,639)
0 7,121
75% $16,494,047
2,350 25% $5,453,793
Total 27,218 100% 22,639 (12,639) 9,471 100% $21,947,840 • Vehicles: Table V -B6 summarizes the allocation of vehicle costs to existing and new development. The City currently has three existing fire vehicles. The City has determined one new fire truck for proposed Station 13 is needed to adequately serve both existing and new development, bringing the total to four vehicles.

Therefore, after providing a credit to existing development for the existing three vehicles, 66% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 34% will be allocated to new development as shown below.

Table V -B6: Allocation of Fire Vehicle Costs
Type of
Development
Percentage Total
EDUs of Total Vehicles in
EDUs 2040
Vehicles
Credit for
Existing
Development
Vehicles Percentage Facility
Net of of Costs Costs
Credit Allocated Allocated
Existing
Development
24,076
88%

3.49 (3)

0.49 66% $1,317,878
Future 3,142 12% 0.25 0 0.25 34% $682,122
Development
Total 27,218 100% 3.74 (3) 0.74 100% $2,000,000
• Total Facilities Costs: The table below shows the total facilities costs allocated to new and existing development.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
35 703

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
Table V -B7: Allocation of Fire Equipment
Stations b Land Acquisition
Fire Truck
Total
Cost Allocate
Existing Developmen
$16,494,047
$1,317,878
$17,811,925

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE
Cost Allocated to
Future Development
$5,453,793
$682,122
$6,135,915
$21,947,840
$2,000,000
$23,947,840
B.5 Proposed Fee Amount
The Fee per EDU was calculated by dividing the costs allocated to future development by the number of future EDUs as shown in the table below.

Table V -B8: Cost per EDU
Type of Development Future Facility Costs Total Cost
_ a EDUs.

Allocated Per EDU
Future Development
3,668 $6,449,597 $1,758.12
See Table V -B9 for the fee amount for each land use based on the cost per EDU as calculated above.

Table V -B9: Proposed Fire Fees
Land Use Type
Number of Futur evelopment Impact Fee
lir
Units / 1,000 Sq. Ft. per Unit / 1,000 Sq. Ft. / Cost Financed / Rooms Room i by Fees
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Total
1,525
1,740
90 225
123
36 225
500
N/A
$1,821.88
$1,220.79
$1,131.12
$795.96
$2,251.03
$2,166.79
$932.25
$258.56
N/A
Estimated Credit Provided to Developer for Previously Mitigated Development Cost Allocated to New Development
Cost Allocated to Existing Development
Total Cost of Fire Facilities
$2,778,365
$2,124,171
$101,801
$179,091
$275,976
$77,138
$209,756
$129,279
$5,875,577
($151,454)
$5,724,123
$14,608,678
$20,332,801
Based on the development projections included in Appendix A, the fee amount presented in the table above is expected to finance 29% of the facilities needed. Also, the estimated credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
36 704

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

FIRE FEE
expectations of future redevelopment projects. This amount is subject to change.

The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelopment is subject to.

Please see the fee model included herein as Appendix B.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
37 705

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
C General Government Facilities

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

GENERAL GOVERNMENT FEE
The General Government Facilities will serve the residents and employees of Placentia by providing general government services. The Fee Study includes a component for an expansion of City Hall that will be required as a direct result of new development within the City. Table IV -E1 illustrates how the government facilities fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 with regard to use of the fee, the type of development funded or partially funded by the fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities and the proportionality requirements.

Table IV -E1: General Government Facilities
AB 1600 Code
Section
Description
AIIM Justification
66001(a) (1)
66001(a)(2)
66001(a) (3)
66001(a)(4)
66001(b)
Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Identify the use to which the fee
is to be put.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the fee's use and the type of
development project on which
the fee is imposed.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the fee is
imposed.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the amount of the fee and the
cost of the public facility.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
construct government facilities that will mitigate the
impacts of new residential and non-residential
development to the City's general government
facilities.

Construction of new government facilities that will
be needed as a direct result of new development in
the City.

New residential and non-residential development in
the City will generate additional residents and
employees increasing the need for general
government services. Buildings used to provide these
services will have to be expanded, constructed or
purchased in order to meet this increased demand.

The additional residents and employees from new
development will impact demand for general
government facilities. New government facilities are
needed to mitigate the impacts of the additional
residents and employees. If additional government
facilities are not constructed, then overall general
government services provided to the residents and
employees in the City will suffer.

The General Government Facilities fee is based on the
cost to provide new government facilities that will be
needed as a direct result of new development in
the City.

April 15, 2026
38 706

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

GENERAL GOVERNMENT FEE
C.1 Existing City Hall
See Table V -E2 for a summary of the existing inventory of the City's existing government facility and safety hall.

Table V -E2: Existing City Hall and Safety Hall
Existing City Hall
22,735 Square Feet
In addition, the City currently has public parking lots and a public parking structure.

C.2 Proposed Facilities
In order to determine the proposed facilities, the City must determine the demand upon infrastructure created by new development. It is clear all new development in the City will impact the City's current ability to provide general government services.

The capacity of the government facilities is finite and will reach practical limits (through various general government requests). When capacity is exceeded, the level of service afforded to existing development will be reduced. In other words, if development continues without an increase in the number of government center facilities, the existing facilities would be overwhelmed in terms of providing general government services. Additional demands will be made upon the previously listed asset in Table V -E2 above and therefore, such assets would need to be expanded.

Table V -E3 identifies the government facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the collection of General Government fees. Quantity and costs are based on estimates provided by the City.

Table V -E3: Needs List
General Government Facilities
Facility Unit Number`
Facility Cost
City Hall Expansion
1 Square Feet 1 17,265
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance)
Net Facilities Cost
$20,474,990
($67,199)
$20,407,791
For purposes of complying with AB 602, the needs list shown above is derived from the Capital Improvement Plan for Development Impact Fees (the "CIP") expected to be approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026, in connection with this Fee Study.

Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is equal to the City's existing LOS.

Note that the general government impact fee calculated herein for residential property is on a per-unit basis. This is due to the fact that service demand for government facilities correlates closely to the number of residents in a home.

Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresponds to additional residents in the home. Therefore, a uniform per-unit fee best reflects the actual impact a new home will have on local City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
39 707

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
government services.

C.3 EDUs

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

GENERAL GOVERNMENT FEE
For general government facilities, the development of property into residential and non-residential uses generates residents and employees increasing the need for general government services. Government facilities used to provide these services will have to be expanded, constructed or purchased to meet this increased demand.

Since the facilities proposed to be financed by the impact fees will serve both residential and non-residential property, DTA projected the number of future EDUs based on the number of residents or employees generated by each land use class.

The table below summarizes the existing and future development and corresponding EDUs, as described in Section IV (Demographics) herein:

Table V -E4: Total EDUs
Type ofe of Developr
pExisting EDU'1� Future EDUs Total EDUs
(2025) (2025-2040)
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Total
Percentage of Total EDUs
C.4 Allocation of Costs
13,238
3,561
482
28 1,773
2,582
2,347
65 24,076

88.46%
1,525
1,166
56 98
151
42 32
71 3,142

11.54%
14,763
4,727
538
126
1,924
2,625
2,379
136
27,218
100.00%
The total cost of $20,407,791, as shown in Table V -E3 above, for general government facilities needed to serve existing and new development is allocated to existing and new development based on the share of total EDUs in 2040.

C.4.i Future Government Facilities
The City has determined additional government facilities, consisting solely of the expansion of City Hall, which is needed to adequately serve both existing and new development.

Table V -E4 summarizes the allocation of City Hall expansion costs to existing and new development. The City currently has 22,735 square feet of existing City Hall buildings. Based on the locations of existing and new development, additional general government facilities will be needed. The City has determined 17,265 new City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
40 708

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

GENERAL GOVERNMENT FEE
building square feet are needed to adequately serve both existing and new development, bringing the total to 40,000 square feet.

Therefore, after providing a credit to existing development for the existing 22,735 square feet, 73% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 27% will be allocated to new development as shown below.

Table V -E5: Allocation of Government Facility Costs
Type of
Development
ercentage Total
of Total Facilities Sq.

EDUs Ft. in 2040
Sq. Ft. Credit
for Existing
Developmen
Building Sq Percentage
Ft. Net of of Costs
Credit Allocated
Facility Costs
Allocated
Existing
Development
Future
Development
24,076
88%
3,142 12%
Total 27,218 100%
35,383
4,617
(22,735)
0 40,000 (22,735)
C.4.ii Total Facilities Costs
See Table V -E6 for the total facilities
development.
12,648
73%
$14,939,786
4,617 27% $5,468,005
17,265 100% $20,407,791
costs allocated to new and
Table V -E6: Total Costs
existing
Cost Allocated to Cost Allocated to
New Facility Existing Future
Development Development Am
Total Costs
Future Building Sq. Ft. $14,939,786
C.5 Proposed Fee Amount
The Fee per EDU was calculated by dividing the costs allocated development by the number of future EDUs as shown in the table below.

Table V -E7: Cost per EDU
$5,468,005
$20,407,791
to future
Type of Development
Future Facility Costs Total Cost
EDUs Allocated Per EDU
Future Development 3,142 $5,468,005 $1,740.36
See Table V -E8 for the fee amount for each land use based on the cost per EDU as calculated above.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
41 709

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

GENERAL GOVERNMENT FEE
Table V -E8: Proposed General Government Fees
Land Use Type
Num . er o ut
Units / 1,000 Sq. F .
/ Rooms
F evelopment Impact Fe Cost Financed
per Unit / 1,000 Sq. Ft. by Fees
Roo
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Total
1,525
1,740
90 225
123
36 225
500
N/A
$1,740.36
$1,166.17
$1,080.51
$760.34
$2,150.31
$2,069.84
$890.54
$246.99
N/A
Estimated Credit Provided to Developer for Previously Mitigated Development Cost Allocated to New Development
Cost Allocated to Existing Development
Total Cost of General Government Facilities
$2,654,051
$2,029,128
$97,246
$171,078
$263,628
$73,686
$200,371
$123,494
$5,612,682
($144,677)
$5,468,005
$14,939,786
$20,407,791
Based on the development projections included in Appendix A, the fee amount presented in the table above is expected to finance 28% of the facilities needed. Also, the estimated credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects. This amount is subject to change.

The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelopment is subject to.

Please see the fee model included herein as Appendix B.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
42 710

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
D Parks Fee

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE
Public parks play an important part in the overall quality of life for residents in the City of Placentia. The Fee Study includes a component for new park facilities that will be required as a direct result of new development within the City. Table V -D1 illustrates how the parks fee will meet the requirements of AB 1600 with regard to use of the fee, the type of development funded or partially funded by the fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for facilities and the proportionality requirements.

Table V -D1: Parks Facilities
AB 1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(a) (1)
66001(a)(2)
66001(a) (3)
66001(a)(4)
66001(b)
Identify the purpose of the Fee.

Identify the use to which the fee
is to be put.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the fee's use and the type of
development project on which
the fee is imposed.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the fee is
imposed.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the amount of the fee and the
cost of the public facility.

Provide a revenue source that will provide funds to
make improvements to land and construct park
facilities that will mitigate the impacts of new
residential development to the City's Parks facilities.

Improvements to park land and expansion of park
buildings that will be needed as a direct result of
new development in the City.

New residential development in the City will generate
additional residents increasing the need for Parks
facilities. Park facilities used to provide these services will have to be expanded or constructed to meet this
increased demand.

The additional residents from new development will
impact demand for Parks facilities. New parks
facilities are needed to mitigate the impacts of the
additional residents and to ensure that the park
facilities are adequate, safe, and in a usable condition.

If additional park facilities are not constructed due to the increased usage from new development, then the
overall quality of the park facilities for residents in the City will suffer.

The Parks Facilities fee is based on the cost to provide park facilities that will be needed as a direct result
of new development in the City.

D.1 Existing Facilities
See Table V -D2 for a summary of the existing inventory of the City's park facilities.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
43 711

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
Table V -D2: Existing Parks Facilities

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE
ESL
Existing Parks
Bradford Park
Champions Sports Complex
Goldenrod Park
Jaycee Parkette
Koch Park
Kraemer Memorial Park
La Placita Parkette
McFadden Park
Parque del Arroyo Verde
Parque de Los Ninos
Parque de Los Vaqueros
Richard Samp Park
Santa Fe Park
Tuffree Hill Park
Wagner Park
136 E. Palm Circle
505 Jefferson St.
925 Goldenrod St.
500 Kansas St.
2210 N. Valencia Ave.
201 N. Bradford Ave.
900 Gonzales St.
900 S. Melrose St.
1001 E. Palm Dr.
1701 Atwood Ave.
1200 N. Carlsbad St.
600 Loyola Dr.
550 W. Santa Fe Ave.
2101 N. Tuffree Blvd.
700 Trumpet Ave.

Total Park Acreage

1.70 Acres

13.33 Acres

2.50 Acres

0.04 Acres

4.30 Acres

11.41 Acres

0.09 Acres

3.90 Acres

4.40 Acres

3.80 Acres

5.40 Acres

3.40 Acres

1.10 Acres

6.80 Acres

1.80 Acres

63.97 Acres
Existing Buildings
Aguirre Building
Backs Community Center
Cathy Torres Teen Center
Edwin T. Powell (Senior Center)
Gomez Community Center
Koch Recreation Center
Types Gym
Whitten Community Center
505 Jefferson St.
201 N. Bradford Ave.
201 N. Bradford Ave.
143 S. Bradford Ave.
1701 Atwood Ave.
2210 N. Valencia Ave.
2101 N. Tuffree Blvd.
900 S. Melrose St.

Total Buildings
5,125 Bldg. Sq. Ft.
10,716 Bldg. Sq. Ft.
1,947 Bldg. Sq. Ft. ,
4,732 Bldg. Sq. Ft.
3,885 Bldg. Sq. Ft.
1,640 Bldg. Sq. Ft.
6,500 Bldg. Sq. Ft. ,
9,278 Bldg. Sq. Ft.
43,823 Bldg. Sq. Ft.

D.2 Proposed Facilities
In order to determine the proposed facilities, the City must determine the demand upon infrastructure created by new development. It is clear new residential development in the City will impact the City's current park system.

The capacity of the park facilities is finite and will reach practical limits (through park and community center visitors). When capacity is exceeded, the level of service afforded to existing development will be reduced. In other words, if development continues without an increase in the number of park facilities, the existing facilities City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
44 712

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE
would be overwhelmed in terms of providing parks services. Additional demands will be made upon the previously listed assets in Table V -D2 above and therefore, such assets would need to be expanded.

Table V -D3 identifies the park facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the collection of Parks fees. Quantity and costs are based on estimates provided by the City.

Table V -D3: Needs List
Parks Facilities
cility Co
026
ADA sidwalk Safety Improvements
Fencing Safety Improvements
Sports Netting at Champions Sports Complex
Champions Sports Complex park lighting
Solar Bollards at Kraemer, McFadden, Los Ninos for walking paths Mcfadden Park walking path, mini pitch Improvements
Parque de Los Vaqueros playground
Dog Park (Tori Hunter or Richard Samps Park)
Restroom Pre -Fab Expansion
Cement Fix and Shade Sails at Pickleball Staging Area
Kraemer Memorial Park Playground Expansion
Kraemer Middle School Lights Improvements
Richard Samp Playground Expansion
Aguirre Rental Facility Expansion
Whitten Community Center Kitchen Expansion
Whitten Community Center Flooring in Kids Room, AV Equipment Mcfadden Pool expansion, staff office expansion
Tuffree Gymnasium Expansion
Backs Community Center Expansion
Master Plan
Multiple Locations
Multiple Locations
505 Jefferson St.
505 Jefferson St.

Multiple Locations
900 S. Melrose St.
1200 N. Carlsbad St.

Multiple Locations
Multiple Locations
Multiple Locations
201 N. Bradford Ave.
645 N. Angelina Dr.
600 Loyola Dr.
505 Jefferson St.
900 S. Melrose St.
900 S. Melrose St.
900 S. Melrose St.
2101 N. Tuffree Blvd
201 N. Bradford Ave
NA
Total
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance)
Net Facilities Cost
$3,000,000
$1,200,000
$65,000
$1,000,000
$300,000
$1,200,000
$350,000
$85,000
$1,800,000
$175,000
$510,000
$1,000,000
$350,000
$45,000
$90,000
$120,000
$1,250,000
$225,000
$2,500,000
$300,000
$15,565,000
($741,801)
$14,823,199
For purposes of complying with AB 602, the needs list shown above is derived from the Capital Improvement Plan for Development Impact Fees (the "CIP") expected to be approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026, in connection with this Fee Study.

Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is equal to or less than the City's existing LOS.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
45 713

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE
Note that the parks impact fee calculated herein for residential property is on a per- unit basis. This is due to the fact that service demand for park facilities correlates closely to the number of residents in a home. Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresponds to additional residents in the home. Therefore, a uniform per-unit fee best reflects the actual impact a new home will have on local parks.

D.3 EDUs
For Parks facilities, the development of property into residential uses generates residents increasing the need for Parks facilities. Developed park acreage and other park buildings will have to be expanded, constructed or purchased to meet this increased demand.

City records do not indicate a significant link between the business community and park use; therefore, no fee is required from non-residential property. Therefore, the EDUs for existing and future development are based on the residents generated from existing and future residential units. There are no EDUs assigned to Non -Residential Property.

As shown in Section IV(D) (Demographics - EDUs), there are 17,309 total existing residential EDUs and 2,845 future residential EDUs, bringing the total residential EDUs in 2040 to 20,154 EDUs.

D.4 Allocation of Costs
The total cost of $14,823,199, as shown in Table V -D3 above, for Parks facilities needed to serve existing and new development is allocated to existing and new development based on the share of total EDUs in 2040.

D.4.i Park Acres
Table V -D4 summarizes the allocation of park development costs to existing and new development. The City currently has 63.97 acres of existing parks. Based on the locations of existing and new development, expansion of park facilities will be needed at various locations. The City has determined that the park improvements and building expansions needed to adequately serve both existing and new development will occur at existing park locations and the City will not need to acquire additional land.

As shown in the table below, 86% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 14% will be allocated to new development.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
46 714

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
Table V -D4: Allocation of Park Costs

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE
Type of Development
Residential
EDUs
Percentage
of Total
EDUs
Facility Costs
Allocated
Existing Development
Future Development
17,309
2,845
Total 20,154
86% $12,730,644
14% $2,092,554
100% $14,823,198
D.5 Proposed Fee Amount
The Fee per EDU was calculated by dividing the costs allocated to future development by the number of future EDUs as shown in the table below.

Table V -D8: Cost per EDU
Type of Developments
IL.1.1Facility Costs
Allocated
Total Cost
Per EDU
Future Residential Property
2,845 $2,092,554 $735.49
See Table V -D9 for the fee amount for each land use based on the cost per EDU as calculated above.

Table V -D9: Proposed Fees
Land Use Type
Number of Future' Development Impact Fe
�
Unit — per Uni
I Cost Financed
by Fees
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
1,525
1,740
90 225
$735.49
$492.83
$456.63
$321.33
Cost Allocated to New Development
Cost Allocated to Existing Development
Total Cost of Park Facilities
$1,121,628
$857,530
$41,097
$72,299
$2,092,554
$12,730,644
$14,823,199
Based on the development projections in Section IV and Appendix A, the fee amount presented in Table V -D9 above are expected to finance approximately 14% of the facilities needed. Also, the estimated credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects. This amount is subject to change. The credit City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
47 715

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

PARKS FEE
amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelopment is subject to.

Please see the fee model included herein as Appendix B.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
48 716

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

COMMUNITY SERVICES FEE
E Quimby Parks Fee
Public parks play an important part in the overall quality of life for residents in the City of Placentia. The Fee Study includes a component for new public parks and improvements to existing parks in connection with a new subdivision pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Section 66477, commonly known as the "Quimby Act," as mentioned earlier in Section III (Legal Requirements).

For proposed residential subdivisions containing fewer than 50 parcels, the Quimby Act allows for the payment of a Quimby in -lieu fee in lieu of land dedication. The purpose of the Quimby in -lieu fee is to accumulate enough funding from several smaller subdivisions for acquiring parkland or the development of neighborhood and community parks to serve such subdivisions.

The City's Community Services Department determines the new facilities to be acquired or improved as needed to serve new residential development.

E.1 Existing and Future Development
Pursuant to the Quimby Act, the parks service population per household must be calculated utilizing the most recent federal census data. Therefore, Table V -D1 below provides estimates of the City's current population and units based on the 2023 US Census Data.

Table V -D1: Parks Service Population and Units by Land Use from 2023 US Census Data Population Category
F
Single
Family
Detached
Attached
Property
� �
Two to Five Plex Mobile
Four Plex mor Homes
Multi- Multi
Family Famil
Property Propert
Existing Residents in City
Existing Residential Units in City
Existing Population per Household
E.2 Fee Calculation
39,023 4,149 7,168 1,420
12,078 1,288 2,905 708

3.2309 3.2213 2.4675 2.0056
51,760
16,979

3.0485
The Quimby Act defines the formula for the calculation of the impact fee as follows:

City Park
Standard Population per
Fee = Cost per Acre x (Acreage x Household divided
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
per 1,000 by 1,000
Residents)
April 15, 2026
49 717

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

COMMUNITY SERVICES FEE
Cost per Acre: The cost of development per acre was estimated by the City, as shown in the table below.

Table V -D2: Cost per Acre
Category
Cost of Development per Acre $2,750,000
City Park Standard: Pursuant to the Quimby Act, the maximum amount of park area calculated for the fee cannot exceed three acres of park area per 1,000 residents.

However, if the existing park area exceeds that limit, then the City may adopt a higher standard not to exceed five acres per 1,000 residents. The City has determined that

3.0 acres per 1,000 residents is the appropriate park standard for new development.

Population per Household: The population per household per unit by residential type is shown in Table V -D1 above.

Proposed Fee: Based on the information above, the proposed fee is shown in table V -D3 below. Please see the fee model included herein as Appendix B for more detail.

Table V -D3: Fee per Dwelling Unit
Residential Land Use from mpact Fee per
2023 US Census Data Dwelling Unit
(other than ADUs)
SFD and SFA
2-4 Plex MFA
5 Plex or greater MFA
Mobile Homes
$26,655
$26,576
$20,357
$16,547
Since ADUs are individual units that are not part of a tract or parcel map, they are not subject to the Quimby Fee.

The Quimby Act also allows developers to dedicate land to the public agency in lieu of paying the Park Fee. The formula for determining the amount of land to dedicate pursuant to the Quimby Act is described below:

City Park
Minimum Avg. Number Acreage
Acreage = of persons per / Standard (3.0
Dedication unit /1,000 acres per 1,000
residents)
For the City, this results in a minimum acreage dedication per dwelling unit, as shown in Table V -D4 below:

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
50 718

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

COMMUNITY SERVICES FEE
Table V -D4: Minimum Acreage Dedication per Dwelling Unit Residential Land Use from
2023 US Census Data
Minimum
Acreage
Dedication per
Dwelling Unit
(other than ADUs)
SFD and SFA
2-4 Plex MFA
5 Plex or greater MFA
Mobile Homes

0.00969

0.00966

0.00740

0.00602
Certain developers may be required to dedicate additional land pursuant to their development agreement with the City.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
51 719

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEE
F Transportation Facilities Fee
The City plans for current and future transportation needs by establishing policies and standards for maintaining an effective and balanced circulation system. As development occurs, additional travel demand is placed on the City's transportation network, resulting in the need for infrastructure improvements to accommodate future growth.

New development within the City generates additional trips that increase traffic volumes on the existing roadway system. Without improvements to roadways, intersections, and related transportation infrastructure, continued development could affect system performance and limit the City's ability to maintain its current circulation conditions.

Transportation facilities are therefore required to mitigate the impacts of new development.

Table I -A1 below illustrates how the Transportation Facilities Fee meets the requirements of AB 1600 with respect to the use of the fee, the type of development funded, the reasonable relationship between the fee and the need for transportation facilities, and proportionality requirements.

Table V -F1: Transportation Facilities
AB 1600 Code
Section
Description
AillM Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.
66001(a)(2)
66001(a) (3)
66001(a)(4)
Identify the use to which the fee
is to be put.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the fee's use and the type of
development project on which
the fee is imposed.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the fee is
imposed.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
Provide a revenue source to fund transportation
improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of new
residential and non-residential development on the
City's circulation system.

Fund or partially fund the construction of new
roadways, intersections, and related transportation
infrastructure that will be needed as a direct result
of new development in the City.

New residential and non-residential development will
generate additional trips on the City's roadway
network. Fee revenue will be used to fund
transportation improvements that accommodate
travel generated by new development. Imposing a
transportation facilities fee on new development is a
reasonable method of mitigating the transportation
impacts associated with such development.

The additional trips generated by new development
increase demand on the City's transportation
network. Intersection improvements, roadway
enhancements, and related transportation facilities
are therefore required to accommodate this
increased demand and maintain system performance
consistent with adopted circulation policies.

April 15, 2026
S2 720

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEE
AB 1600 Code
Section
Description
stification
66001(b)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the amount of the fee and the
cost of the public facility.

Project costs are allocated to new development
based on the proportionate share of transportation
demand generated by future growth. The fee for each
land use category is calculated using relative trip
generation rates, ensuring a reasonable relationship
between the fee amount and the impacts attributable
to new development.

F.1 Proposed Facilities and Costs
To identify the transportation improvements needed to serve future development, the City evaluated the impacts of projected growth on the City's circulation system through the planning horizon year of 2040. New residential and non-residential development will increase traffic volumes on the City's roadway network and affect the City's ability to maintain acceptable levels of service.

Based on this evaluation, the City identified transportation improvements necessary to mitigate the impacts of future development. These improvements include intersection and traffic signal enhancements, roadway and corridor improvements, and active transportation facilities designed to support safe and efficient circulation as development occurs.

Certain transportation improvements will benefit both existing and future development. To the extent that projects address existing deficiencies or provide benefits beyond accommodating future growth, those portions are not funded by development impact fees and are expected to be funded through other sources. The transportation facilities fee is limited to the portion of project costs reasonably related to mitigating the impacts of new development.

The allocation of project costs to new development is based on the proportional share of traffic demand generated by future development relative to total system demand. The project categories, costs, and allocations are summarized in Table V -F2 below.

Table V -F2: Transportation Cost Summary
Total Project Less Offsetting
Cost Revenue (Existin
Fee Balance)
Cost
I
tet Project
Intersection & Traffic Signal Improvements
Roadway & Corridor Improvements
Active Transportation Improvements
Grand Total
$1,112,900
$1,240,000
$26,185,300
$28,538,200
($0)
($0)
($0)
($0)
$1,112,900
$1,240,000
$26,185,300
$28,538,200
The list of projects to be funded, or partially funded, are shown by components in Tables V - F3 through V -F5. The total project cost as well as the costs allocated to new development City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
53 721

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
are also shown in the tables.

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEE
Table V -F3: Intersection & Traffic Signal Improvements Location
Allocation
to Existing
Development
$ Allocation
to Existing
Development
Allocation $ Allocation 2026 Estimated
to New to New Cost
Development Development
j
Lakeview Ave at Miraloma
Van Buren St at Orchard Dr
Placentia Ave at Santa Fe
Kraemer Rd at Connecticut Way
Miraloma at Van Buren
Total

87.88%

87.88%
$185,249
$185,249
$179,801
$256,080
$171,628
$978,006

12.12%

12.12%
Table V -F4: Roadway & Corridor Improvements
$25,551
$25,551
$24,799
$35,320
$23,672
$134,894
$210,800
$210,800
$204,600
$291,400
$195,300
$1,112,900
Project/Scope
Allocation
to Existing
Development
$ Allocation
to Existing
Development
Allocation
to New
Development
n
$ Allocation
to New
Developme
2026
Estimated
Cost
Placentia Ave/Crowther Ave
Orangethorpe Ave/Placentia Ave
Orangethorpe Ave/SR-57 Northbound
Ramps
Orangethorpe Ave/Melrose St
Kraemer Blvd/Orangethorpe Ave
Total

87.88%

87.88%
$108,970
$490,365
$272,425
$108,970
$108,970
$1,089,700

12.12% $15,030

12.12% $67,635

12.12% $37,575

12.12% $15,030

12.12% $15,030
$150,300
Table V -F5: Active Transportation Improvements
$124,000
$558,000
$310,000
$124,000
$124,000
$1,240,000
Project/Scope
Allocation
to Existing
Development
$ Allocation
to Existing
Development
Allocation
to New
Development
$ Allocatio
to New
Developmen
2026
Estimated
Cost
Class I Shared -Use Path (2 miles)
Class II Bike Lane (1.2 miles)
Class IIIB Buffered Bike Lane (5.4 miles)
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard (7.2 miles)
Class IV Separated Bikeway (8.5 miles)
Total

87.88%

87.88%
$2,847,281
$145,440
$7,213,112
$3,916,594
$8,031,442
$23,011,393

12.12%

12.12%
$392,719
$20,060
$994,888
$540,206
$1,107,758
$3,173,907
$3,240,000
$165,500
$8,208,000
$4,456,800
$9,139,200
$26,185,300
For purposes of complying with AB 602, the needs list shown above is derived from the Capital Improvement Plan for Development Impact Fees (the "CIP") expected to be approved City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
54 722

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEE
by the City Council on April 21, 2026, in connection with this Fee Study. Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is equal to or less the City's existing LOS.

Note that the transportation impact fee calculated herein for residential property is on a per-unit basis. This is due to the fact that service demand for transportation facilities correlates closely to the number of residents in a home. Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresponds to additional residents in the home. Therefore, a uniform per-unit fee best reflects the actual impact a new home will have on local highways and roads.

F.2 Average Daily Trips (ADTs)
The reasonable relationship used to allocate transportation facility costs between existing and future development is based on each land use's relative contribution to vehicular traffic on the City's roadway network. For purposes of this Fee Study, Average Daily Trips ("ADTs") are used as the demand metric to measure transportation impacts generated by development.

ADTs represent the estimated number of vehicular trip ends generated by a specific land use over a typical weekday. ADTs are a standard transportation planning metric and are commonly used in regional and local transportation analyses. ADT generation rates for the various land uses were obtained from the latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual.

For land use categories not explicitly identified in the ITE Manual, ADT rates were estimated using industry -standard assumptions and comparable land use classifications to reflect anticipated trip -making characteristics.

Residential ADTs are calculated on a per-unit basis, while non-residential ADTs are calculated based on estimated trip generation per 1,000 square feet of building area or per room, as applicable. The ADT rates applied to each land use represent the relative traffic demand placed on the City's roadway system by that use.

When ADT rates are applied to the demographic data for existing and future development, the total calculated ADTs for each land use category can be expressed as a percentage of total system ADTs. These percentages are used to allocate transportation facility costs between existing and future development in proportion to their respective contributions to traffic volumes on the City's roadway network.

F.3 Trip Rates
The land uses upon which Transportation Facilities Fees will be imposed include Residential (single-family, multi -family, mobile home, and accessory dwelling unit), Commercial/Retail, Office, Industrial, and Hotel/Motel development.

Table V -F6 shows the average daily trip rates used for this Fee Study.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
55 723

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEE
Table V -F6: Trip Generation Rates
Land Use
City Designation - ITE Designation 1
Average
Daily Trips 2
Residential
(Dwelling Units)
Non -Residential
(KSF/Rooms)
Single -Family
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
ADU
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Single -Family Detached
Multi -Family House (Low -Rise)
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Department Store
General Office Building
General Light Industrial
Hotel

9.09 6.21

7.87 4.55

22.88 7.83

3.60 5.84
Notes:

1. ITE designations shown represent the closest applicable land use categories available in the ITE Trip Generation Manual.

2. Numbers in this column (bold) are used in this Fee Study for calculating ADTs and Fee Schedule.

To allocate transportation facility costs between existing and future development, total ADTs are calculated for both conditions. ADTs for existing development within the City are calculated for each land use category by multiplying the number of residential dwelling units or the amount of non-residential building area, expressed in thousands of square feet ("KSF"), by the applicable ADT rates per unit or per KSF.

The total ADTs for existing and future development, as well as the percentage of total ADTs attributable to existing and future development, are summarized in Tables V -F7 and V -F8, respectively.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
56 724

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEE
Table V -F7: Existing ADTs
Residential Property
Number of Existing Units F
Average Daily
Trips per Unit/KS
ADTs
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Unit
13,238 Units
4,529 Units
776 Units
65 Units

9.09 6.21

7.87 4.55
120,333
28,125
6,107
295
Non -Residential Property
Number of Existing Building Sq.

Ft. / Rooms
Average Daily
Trips per Unit/KSF
ADTs
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
1,735,238 sq. ft.
2,716,194 sq. ft.
5,010,579 sq. ft.
460 Rooms

22.88 7.83

3.60 5.84
Total
Total Existing and Future ADTs
of Total ADTs
Table V -F8: Future ADTs
39,702
21,268
18,038
2,686
236,556
269,183

87.88%
Residential Property
Number of Future Unitsiii
ADTs per
Unit/KSF
ADTs
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Unit
1,525 Units
1,740 Units
90 Units
225 Units

9.09 6.21

7.87 4.55
13,862
10,805
708
1,023
Non -Residential Property
Number of Future Building
Sq. Ft. / Rooms
ADTs per ji ADTs
Unit/KSF
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
122,600 sq. ft.
35,600 sq. ft.
62,540 sq. ft.
500 Rooms
Total Existing
F4 Allocation of Costs

22.88 7.83

3.60 5.84
Total
and Future ADTs
of Total ADTs
2,805
279
225
2,920
32,628 �
269,183

12.12%
The transportation facility costs allocated to new development are divided by the total number of new ADTs to determine a cost per ADT. This cost per ADT represents the baseline unit cost used to calculate transportation facilities fees for each land use category.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
S7 725

IIIIL Residential Property
dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEE
Table V -F9: Cost per ADT
Total Cost of Cost Allocated to Total New
Transportation Projects New Development al ADTs
Cost per ADT
$28,538,200
$3,459,101
32,628
$106.02
F.5 Proposed Fee Amount
The proposed transportation facilities fee schedules are calculated by applying the cost per ADT to the applicable trip generation rates for each land use category. The resulting fee schedule is presented in Table V -F10 below.

Table V -F10: Transportation Fee Schedule
Development
ADTs Cost Per Impact Fee per Units
Unit
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Unit

9.09 6.21

7.87 4.55
$106.02
$106.02
$106.02
$106.02
$963.70
$658.37
$834.36
$481.85
DU
DU
DU
DU
Non -Residential Property
AD Cost Per A
evelopment
Impact Fee
1,000 Sq. Ft. /
Room
Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel

22.88 7.83

3.60 5.84
$106.02
$106.02
$106.02
$106.02
$2,425.69
$830.12
$381.66
$619.14
KSF
KSF
KSF
Room
F.6 Expected Revenue
Expected transportation facilities fee revenue is calculated by applying the proposed fee rates to the projected residential units, non-residential building area, and hotel rooms associated with future development.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
S8 726

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES FEE
Table V -F11: Expected Revenue
Residential Property
Number of Future Units DIF per Unit
Cost Financed
by Fees
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Unit
1,525 Units
1,740 Units
90 Units
225 Units
$963.70
$658.37
$834.36
$481.85
$1,469,645
$1,145,565
$75,092
$108,416
hNonResidential Property Number of Future Building
Sq. Ft. / Rooms
DIF per 1,000
SF/Room
•
Cost Financed
by Fees
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
122,600 sq. ft.
35,600 sq. ft.
62,540 sq. ft.
500 Rooms
$2,425.69
$830.12
$381.66
$619.14
Total
Estimated Credit Provided to Developer for Previously Mitigated Development Cost Allocated to Existing Development
Total Cost of Transportation Facilities
$297,389
$29,552
$85,874
$309,572
$3,521,106
($62,005)
$25,079,099
$28,538,200
The fee amounts shown above in Table V -F11 is expected to finance approximately 12% of the transportation facilities. Also, the estimated credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects. This amount is subject to change. The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelopment is subject to. The City will need to fund the remaining facility costs from other funding sources.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
S9 727

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

STREETSCAPE FACILITIES FEE
G Streetscape Facilities Fee
Development within the City's designated transit -oriented development ("TOD") area is intended to support higher -intensity, pedestrian -oriented, mixed-use development. As development occurs, additional demand is placed on the public street environment, including increased pedestrian use, frontage activation, and demand for enhanced streetscape conditions.

New development within the TOD area will increase use of sidewalks, crossings, and other streetscape elements. Without corresponding streetscape improvements, continued development would limit the City's ability to maintain a safe, functional, and walkable street environment consistent with the intended character of the TOD area. Streetscape facilities are therefore needed to mitigate the impacts of new development within the TOD area.

For purposes of this Fee Study, streetscape impacts associated with development are evaluated exclusively within the TOD area. Streetscape facilities serving the TOD area are intended to address the unique scale, intensity, and urban form associated with TOD development.

Table V -G1 below illustrates how the Streetscape Facilities Fee meets the requirements of AB 1600 with respect to the use of the fee, the type of development funded, the reasonable relationship between the fee and the need for streetscape facilities, and proportionality requirements.

Table V -G1: Streetscape Facilities
AB 1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.
66001(a)(2)
66001(a) (3)
Identify the use to which the fee
is to be put.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the fee's use and the type of
development project on which
the fee is imposed.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
Provide a revenue source to fund streetscape
improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of new
development within the TOD area.

Fee revenue will be used to fund or partially fund
streetscape improvements within the TOD area, such
as sidewalk enhancements, pedestrian crossings,
frontage improvements, and related streetscape
elements that will be needed as a direct result of
new development in the TOD area.

New development within the TOD area increases
pedestrian activity and intensifies use of streets and
sidewalks. Streetscape improvements funded by the
fee are designed to accommodate these
development -related impacts and support safe and
functional circulation associated with TOD
development.

April 15, 2026
60 728

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

STREETSCAPE FACILITIES FEE
AB 1600 Code
Section lig
Description Al!
Justification
66001(a)(4)
66001(b)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the fee is
imposed.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the amount of the fee and the
cost of the public facility.

Higher -intensity development within the TOD area
increases demand on sidewalks, pedestrian crossings,
and streetscape infrastructure. Streetscape
improvements are needed to maintain acceptable
conditions and safety as development occurs.

Streetscape facility costs are allocated to new
development based on the proportional share of
traffic demand generated within the area. The fee
amount reflects the relative contribution of new
development to transportation activity that
necessitates these improvements.

G.1 Proposed Facilities and Costs
To identify the streetscape improvements needed to serve future development within the TOD area, the City evaluated the impacts of projected growth through the planning horizon year of 2040. Development in the TOD area is anticipated to occur at higher densities and intensities, resulting in increased pedestrian activity and greater demand for sidewalks, crossings, and related streetscape infrastructure.

Based on this evaluation, the City identified streetscape improvements necessary to accommodate future development. These improvements are intended to enhance pedestrian circulation, improve safety and accessibility, and support higher -intensity mixed-use development within the TOD area.

Certain streetscape improvements will benefit both existing and future development. To the extent that improvements address existing conditions, those portions are not funded by development impact fees and are expected to be funded through other sources. The Streetscape Facilities Fee is limited to the portion of project costs reasonably related to mitigating the impacts of new development.

For purposes of this Fee Study, the streetscape improvements apply only to development within the TOD area. Project costs are allocated to new development based on the proportional share of Average Daily Trips generated by future development within the TOD area relative to total ADTs. Streetscape project categories, costs, and allocations are summarized in Table V -G2.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
61 729

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

STREETSCAPE FACILITIES FEE
Table V -G2: Streetscape Cost Summary (TOD Area)
Component
Total Project Less Offsettin
Cost Revenue (Existi
Fee Balanc
et Project
Cost
Streetscape Improvements
Grand Total
$4,100,000
$4,100,000
($877,936)
($877,937)
$3,222,063
$3,222,063 II
The list of projects to be funded, or partially funded, are shown by components in Table V -G3. The total project cost as well as the costs allocated to new development are also shown in the table.

Table V -G3: Streetscape Improvements (TOD Area)
Project/Scope
Allocation $ Allocation to % Allocation $ Allocation to 2026 to Existing Existing to New New Estimated
Development Development Development Development Cost
TOD Streetscape Improvements
Total

45.91%
$1,479,143
$1,479,143

54.09%
$1,742,920
$1,742,920
$3,222,063
$3,222,063
For purposes of complying with AB 602, the needs list shown above is derived from the Capital Improvement Plan for Development Impact Fees (the "CIP") expected to be approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026, in connection with this Fee Study. Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is equal to or less than the City's existing LOS.

Note that the streetscape impact fee calculated herein for multi -family residential property is on a per-unit basis. This is due to the fact that service demand for streetscape facilities correlates closely to the number of residents in a multi -family unit. Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger unit in the City corresponds to additional residents in the unit. Therefore, a uniform per-unit fee best reflects the actual impact a new multi -family unit will have on local streetscape improvements.

G.2 Average Daily Trips (ADTs)
The reasonable relationship used to allocate streetscape facility costs between existing and future development is based on each land use's relative contribution to travel activity within the TOD area. For purposes of this Fee Study, Average Daily Trips ("ADTs") are used as the demand metric to measure streetscape impacts generated by development.

ADTs represent the estimated number of daily trip ends generated by a specific land use over a typical weekday. In the context of this Fee Study, ADTs are used to reflect differences in development intensity and land use activity within the TOD area, which influence the demand for pedestrian -oriented streetscape facilities such as sidewalks, crossings, and related frontage improvements.

ADT generation rates for the various land uses were obtained from the latest edition of the City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
62 730

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

STREETSCAPE FACILITIES FEE
ITE Trip Generation Manual. Where a specific land use is not separately identified in the ITE Manual, ADT rates reflect trip -making characteristics consistent with the intended use and scale of development. Residential ADTs are calculated on a per-unit basis, while non- residential ADTs are calculated based on estimated trip generation per 1,000 square feet of building area or per room, as applicable.

When ADT rates are applied to the demographic data for existing and future development within the TOD area, the resulting ADTs can be expressed as a percentage of total ADTs.

These percentages are used to allocate streetscape facility costs between existing and future development in proportion to their relative contribution to overall travel activity within the TOD area.

Because the Streetscape Facilities Fee applies only to development within the TOD area, ADT calculations and cost allocation presented in this section are limited to development within the TOD area.

G.3 Trip Rates
The land uses upon which Streetscape Facilities Fees will be imposed are within the TOD area and include Residential (multi -family), Commercial/Retail, Office, Industrial, and Hotel/Motel development.

Table V -G4 presents the trip generation rates, in ADTs, used for the Streetscape Facilities Fee within the TOD area.

Table V -G4: Trip Generation Rates
1=1" � 1 Average
Land UselMilir City Designation ITE Designation z
Daily Trips
Residential
(Dwelling Units)
Non -Residential
(KSF/Rooms)
Multi -Family
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Multi -Family House (Low -Rise)
Department Store
General Office Building
General Light Industrial
Hotel

6.21 22.88

7.83 3.60

5.84 Notes:

1. ITE designations shown represent the closest applicable land use categories available in the ITE Trip Generation Manual.

2. Numbers in this column (bold) are used in this Fee Study for calculating ADTs and Fee Schedule.

To allocate streetscape facility costs between existing and future development, total ADTs are calculated for both conditions. ADTs for existing development within the TOD area are calculated for each land use category by multiplying the number of residential dwelling units or the amount of non-residential building area, expressed in thousands of square feet ("KSF"), by the applicable ADT rates per unit or per KSF shown above.

The total ADTs for existing development within the TOD area, as well as the percentage of City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
63 731

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

STREETSCAPE FACILITIES FEE
total ADTs attributable to existing development, are summarized in Table V -G5.

Table V -G5: Existing ADTs (TOD Area)
Residential Property
Number of Existing 91
Average Daily Trips
per Unit/KSF
ADTs
TOD - Multi -Family
633 Units

6.21 1 3,931
Non -Residential Property
Number of Existing Average Daily
Building Sq. Ft. / Room _Trips per Unit/KSF
ADTs
TOD - Commercial/Retail
TOD - Office
TOD - Industrial
TOD - Hotel/Motel
93,975 sq. ft.
135,416 sq. ft.
270,767 sq. ft.
0 Rooms

22.88 7.83

3.60 5.84
Total
Total Existing and Future ADTs
of Total ADTs
2,150
1,060
975
01 8,116 1
17,680

45.91%
ADTs for future development are calculated for each land use category by multiplying the projected number of residential dwelling units or the amount of non-residential building area, expressed in thousands of square feet (KSF), by the applicable ADT rates per unit or per KSF.

The total ADTs for future development, as well as the percentage of total ADTs attributable to future development, are summarized in Table V -G6.

Table V -G6: Future ADTs (TOD Area)
Residential Property
Number of Future Units
ADTs per Unit/KS
ADTs
TOD - Multi -Family
1,290 Units

6.21 8,011
Non -Residential Property Number of Future
Building Sq. Ft. / Rooms
ADTs per
m.'" ADTs
Unit/KSF
TOD - Commercial/Retail
TOD - Office
TOD - Industrial 1
TOD - Hotel/Motel
50,000 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft.
(162,460) sq. ft.
150 Rooms

22.88 7.83

3.60 5.84
Total
Total Existing and Future ADTs
of Total ADTs
1,144
117
(585)
876
9,563
17,680

54.09%
Notes:

1. Reflects the anticipated removal of existing industrial uses within the TOD area as properties redevelop into higher -density residential and mixed-use development.

The percentage of total ADTs attributable to future development is used to allocate City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
64 732

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

STREETSCAPE FACILITIES FEE
streetscape facility costs to new development within the TOD area.

G.4 Allocation of Costs
The streetscape facility costs allocated to new development are divided by the total number of new ADTs to determine a cost per ADT. This cost per ADT represents the baseline unit cost used in calculating the streetscape facilities fee for each applicable land use category within the TOD area.

Table V -G7: Cost per ADT (TOD Area)
* Total Cost oflr
Cost Allocated to
Streetscape Projects New Development
Total New Cost per AD
ADT
$3,222,063
$1,742,920
9,563
$182.25
G.5 Proposed Fee Amount
The proposed streetscape facilities fee schedule is calculated by applying the cost per ADT to the applicable ADT rates for each TOD land use category. The resulting fee schedule for streetscape facilities within the TOD area is presented in Table V -G8 below.

Table V -G8: Streetscape Fee Schedule (TOD Area)
Residential Propert
Cost Per
ADT
TOD - Multi -Family

6.21 $182.25
$1,131.76
DU
Non -Residential Property
TOD - Commercial/Retail
TOD - Office
TOD - Industrial
TOD - Hotel/Motel

22.88 7.83

3.60 5.84
Cost Per
ADT
$182.25
$182.25
$182.25
$182.25
DIF per 1,000 1
SF/Room
$4,169.82
$1,427.00
$656.09
$1,064.32
KSF
KSF
KSF
Room
G.6 Expected Revenue
Expected streetscape facilities fee revenue is calculated by applying the proposed fee rates to the projected residential units, non-residential building area, and hotel rooms associated with future development.

As shown in Table V -G9, the total expected revenue represents the portion of streetscape facility costs allocated to new development.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
65 733

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

STREETSCAPE FACILITIES FEE
Table V -G9: Revenue (TOD Area)
IL Residential Property
Number of Future Units imil2IF per Uni
Cost Financed
by Fees
TOD - Multi -Family
1,290 Units
$1,131.76
$1,459,964
Non -Residential Property Number of Future Building S DIF per 1,000 Ft. / Rooms SF/Room
Cost Financed
by Fees
TOD - Commercial/Retail
TOD - Office
TOD - Industrial
TOD - Hotel/Motel
50,000 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft.
0 sq. ft.
150 Rooms
$4,169.82
$1,427.00
$656.09
$1,064.32
Total
Estimated Credit Provided to Developer for Previously Mitigated Development Cost Allocated to New Development Following Credit for Redevelopment Cost Allocated to Existing Development
Total Cost of Streetscape Facilities
$208,491
$21,405
$0
$159,649
$1,849,508
($106,589)
$1,742,920
$1,479,143
$3,222,063
The fee amounts shown in Table V -G9 are expected to finance approximately 54% of the TOD area streetscape facilities. Also, the estimated credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects. This amount is subject to change. The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelopment is subject to. The City will need to fund the remaining facility costs from other funding sources.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
66 734

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
H Sewer Facilities Fee

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
The Sewer Facilities will serve development within the City by providing new and expanded wastewater conveyance infrastructure necessary to accommodate sanitary flows generated by future growth. Sewer facilities may include sewer conveyance improvements and related appurtenances required to upgrade, replace, and expand existing sewer infrastructure to meet increased wastewater demands. The planning horizon assumed in this Fee Study is the buildout year of 2040.

For purposes of this Fee Study, development within the designated TOD area is evaluated separately from non-TOD development. Sewer facilities serving TOD areas are expected to experience a different development intensity and wastewater generation profile than non- TOD areas. As a result, the sewer facility costs, EDU factors, and cost allocations associated with TOD development are calculated independently to ensure that sewer facility costs are proportionally allocated based on the impacts generated by each type of development. As described further in this section, property in the TOD area will be subject to both the City- wide sewer impact fee as well as the TOD area specific impact fee.

Table V -H1 below illustrates how the sewer facilities fee will meet the requirements of AB1600 with regard to the use of the fee, the type of development funded, or partially funded by the fee revenue, the reasonable relationship to the need for the facilities and the proportionality requirements.

Table V -H1: Sewer Facilities
AB 1600 Code
Section
Wir
Descnp ion
Justification
66001(a)(1) Identify the purpose of the Fee.
66001(a)(2)
66001(a) (3)
Identify the use to which the fee
is to be put.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the fee's use and the type of
development project on which
the fee is imposed.

To provide a revenue source that will pay for the
construction of sewer projects that will be used to
mitigate the impacts of new development within the
City.

Revenue from this fee will be used to construct new
sewer facilities that will be used to provide general
sewer collection, conveyance and treatment services
that will be needed as a direct result of new
development in the City.

New residential and non-residential development will
generate additional residents and employees that will
increase the demand for sewer facilities. Sewer fees
collected from new development will be used
exclusively for construction -related costs associated
with these projects.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
67 735

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
AB 1600 Code
Section
Description
Justification
66001(a)(4)
66001(b)
Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the need for the public facilities
and the type of development
project on which the fee is
imposed.

Demonstrate how there is a
reasonable relationship between
the amount of the fee and the
cost of the public facility.

New residential and non-residential development
within the City will generate additional residents and
employees that will increase the need to collect and
treat sewage generated by such new development.

New and expanded conveyance facilities are needed
to collect and convey wastewater generated by future
development.

The cost of the proposed facilities is based on
projected sewer generation from the various land
uses. The amount of the fee for each land use is
calculated based on the relative contribution of City-
wide sewer flow from each land use.

H.1 Proposed Facilities and Costs
To identify the sewer improvements needed to serve future development, the City evaluated the demand placed on the sewer system by new development. New development within the City will increase wastewater flows within the existing sewer system and may affect the City's ability to provide adequate sewer service. When system capacity is exceeded due to increased wastewater flows from new development, the level of service provided to existing development may be reduced. Without improvements to the sewer system, continued development would limit the City's ability to maintain sewer service consistent with City standards.

The City identified separate sewer capital improvement needs for the entire City and for the TOD area only. Table V -H2 below summarizes the proposed improvements funded in whole or in part through the collection of Sewer Facilities Fees for development throughout the City, while Table V -H3 summarizes the proposed improvements associated with TOD development only. Quantities and costs are based on estimates provided by the City.

Table V -H2: Sewer Cost Summary (City-wide)
Capacity Increases
Grand Total
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
$15,600,290
$15,600,290
'l ess Offsetting
venue (Existing Fee
Balance)
($0)
($0)
$15,600,290
$15,600,290 li
April 15, 2026
68 736

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
Table V -H3: Sewer Cost Summary (TOD Area Only)
Component
Total Project Cost
Less Offsetting
Revenue (Existing Fee
Balance)
Net Project Cost
Capacity Increases
Grand Total
$2,245,646
$2,245,646
($0)
($0)
$2,245,646
$2,245,646
The list of projects to be funded, or partially funded, is shown by component in Tables V - H4 and V -H5. The tables also present the total project cost and the portion of costs allocated to new development.

Table V -H4: Sewer Needs List (City-wide)
IL Location/Component
% Allocation to
Existing
Development
$ Allocation t
Existini
Developmen
% Allocation t
Ne
Developmen
(location to I 2026
New Estimated Cost
evelopment
Bradford Ave, Orange Grove Ave,
Walnut Ave, Santa Barbara St &
Placentia Ave
Twilight St, Sunrise Way, Sunrise St
Melody Ln, Chapman Ave &
Placentia Ave
Orangethorpe Ave
Orangethorpe Ave, Melrose St,
Silverlake Dr & Glenlake Dr
Tuffree Blvd
Bastanchury Rd

90.41% $6,181,567

90.41% $2,240,918

90.41% $1,114,446

90.41% $3,195,012

90.41% $847,193

90.41% $525,153
$14,104,288

9.59% $655,661 $6,837,228

9.59% $237,688 $2,478,606

9.59% $118,206 $1,232,652

9.59% $338,886 $3,533,898

9.59% $89,859 $937,052

9.59% $55,701 $580,854
$1,496,002 $15,600,290
Table V -H5: Sewer Needs List (TOD Area Only)
ilk_Location/Component
% Allocation to
Existing
Development
$ Allocation t
Existin
Developmen
% Allocation t•
Ne
Developmen
$ Allocation to
New
Development
2026
Estimated Cost
Old Town CIP (Crowther Ave)

48.27%
$1,084,023
$1,084,023

51.73%
$1,161,623
$1,161,623
$2,245,646
$2,245,646
For purposes of complying with AB 602, the needs list shown above is derived from the Capital Improvement Plan for Development Impact Fees (the "CIP") expected to be approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026, in connection with this Fee Study. Furthermore, the facilities to be funded by future development is equal to or less than the City's existing LOS.

Note that the sewer impact fee calculated herein for residential property is on a per-unit basis. This is due to the fact that service demand for sewer facilities correlates closely to the number of residents in a home. Furthermore, the City has determined that, on average, there is no evidence that a larger home in the City corresponds to additional residents in the home. Therefore, a uniform per-unit fee best reflects the actual impact a new home will City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
69 737

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
have on local sewer improvements.

H.2 EDUs

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
The reasonable relationship used to allocate sewer facility costs between existing and future development is based on each land use's relative contribution to wastewater generation.

EDUs are used to express wastewater demand from different land uses on a common basis.

EDUs represent the amount of wastewater generated by a particular land use relative to a defined residential baseline.

A single-family residential dwelling unit is used as the base EDU and is assigned an EDU factor of 1.00. Wastewater generation rates, expressed in gallons per day ("gpd"), are applied to each land use category based on established demand factors previously reviewed and approved by the City. Residential EDUs are calculated on a per-unit basis, while non- residential EDUs are calculated based on estimated wastewater generation per 1,000 square feet of building area.

The total number of EDUs attributable to existing development is calculated by applying the applicable EDU factors to existing residential units and non-residential building area. These EDUs are then used to allocate sewer facility costs between existing and future development in proportion to their respective contributions to systemwide wastewater demand.

The EDU factors and resulting EDU totals by land use are presented in Table V -H6.

Table V -H6: Equivalent Dwelling Unit Factors
jld Us
Units
Residential
Use Factor
(gpd per unit)
JI
Non -
Residential
Use Factor
(gpd per ksf)
EDU Factor
Single -Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units
Square Feet
Square Feet
Square Feet
Rooms
210.00
120.00
105.00
105.00
120.00
137.74
137.74
146.92

1.000

0.571

0.500

0.656

0.700

0.571
When the EDU factors are applied to the demographic data, the resulting EDUs for existing and future development are expressed as a percentage of total EDUs and used to allocate City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
70 738

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
sewer facility costs to new development.
1-1.3 Methodology
To allocate sewer facility costs between existing and future development, total EDUs are calculated for each condition. EDUs for existing and future development within each land use category are calculated by multiplying the number of residential dwelling units or the amount of non-residential building area, expressed in thousands of square feet ("KSF"), by the applicable EDU factors shown in the tables above.

The total EDUs for existing development, as well as the percentage of total EDUs attributable to existing development, are shown in Tables V -H7 and V -H8.

Table V -H7: Existing Equivalent Dwelling Units (City-wide) Residential Property
Number of Existing Residential
Units
EDU Factor Iotal EDUs]
Single -Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
13,238 Units
4,529 Units
776 Units
65 Units

1.000

0.571

0.500

0.500
13,238
2,588
388
33 Non -Residential Property
Number of Existing Non- EDU Factor
Residential Building sq. ft./Roorrl
Total EDUs
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
1,735,238 sq. ft.
2,716,194 sq. ft.
5,010,579 sq. ft.
460 Rooms

0.656

0.700

0.571
Total Existing Development EDUs
of Total EDUs
Total EDUs
April 15, 2026
1,138
1,782
3,505
263
22,935 ,

88.66%
26,045
71 739

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
Table V -H8: Existing Equivalent Dwelling Units (TOD Area) —1.111
Residential Property
Number of Existing Residential
Units
EDU Factor Total EDUs
TOD - Multi -Family
on -Residential Prope
TOD - Commercial/Retail
TOD - Office
TOD - Industrial
TOD - Hotel/Motel
633 Units

0.571
362
Number of Existing No EDU Fac Total EDU
Residential Buil Roo
93,975 sq. ft.
135,416 sq. ft.
270,767 sq. ft.
0 Rooms

0.656

0.700

0.571
Total Existing Development EDUs
of Total EDUs
Total EDUs
62 89
189
0,
702

48.27%
1,453
EDUs for future development are calculated using the same methodology applied to existing development. For each land use category, EDUs are calculated by multiplying the number of residential dwelling units or the amount of non- residential building area, expressed in thousands of square feet, by the applicable EDU factors.

The total EDUs for future development, as well as the percentage of total EDUs attributable to future development, are shown in Tables V -H9 and V -H10.

Table V -H9: Future Equivalent Dwelling Units (City-wide) Single -Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Horne
Accessory Dwelling Units
Non -Residential Property
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
1,525 Units
1,740 Units
90 Units
225 Units
Number of Future Non
Residential Building s
ft./Room

1.000

0.571

0.500

0.500
1,525
994
45 113
EDU Factor
122,600 sq. ft.
35,600 sq. ft.
62,540 sq. ft.
500 Rooms

0.656

0.700

0.571
Total Future Development EDUs
of Total EDUs
Total EDUs
April 15, 2026
80 23
44 286
3,110

11.94%
26,045
72 740

Non-Resien ial Property
dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
Table V -H10: Future Equivalent Dwelling Units (TOD Area) ilk
Residential Property Number of Future Residential
milUnits
EDU Factor Total EDUs
TOD - Multi -Family
1,290 Units

0.571
737
Number of Future No
Residential Building s
f.R
•
DU F
TOD - Commercial/Retail
TOD - Office
TOD - Industrial 1
TOD - Hotel/Motel
50,000 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft.
(162,460) sq. ft.

0.656

0.700
33 10
(114)
150 Rooms 0.571 86
Total Future Development EDUs (TOD Only) 752 �
of Total EDUs (TOD Only) 51.73%
Total EDUs (TOD Only) 1,453
Notes:

1. Reflects the anticipated removal of existing industrial uses within the TOD area as properties redevelop into higher -density residential and mixed-use development.

The percentage of total EDUs attributable to future development, as shown in Tables V -H9 and V -H10, is used to allocate sewer facility costs to new development for non-TOD and TOD facilities, respectively.

H.4 Allocation of Costs
The sewer facility costs allocated to new development are divided by the total EDUs attributable to new development to determine the cost per EDU. The cost per EDU represents the unit cost used to calculate sewer facilities fees for the various land use categories.

Table V -H11: Cost per EDU (City-wide)
Allocated to Cost Allocated to
Total Cost of Sewer Total New
New New
Projects
Development Development Ilk EDUs
Cost per EDU
$15,600,290
Total Cost of Sewer
Projects
$2,245,646

11.94%
$1,862,251
Table V -H12: Cost per EDU (TOD Area)
Allocated to Cost Allocated t
New New
Development Development
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

51.73 $1,161,623
3,110
Total New
EDUs
$598.98
Cost per ED
752
April 15, 2026
$1,545 06
73 741

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
H.5 Proposed Fee Amount
The EDU factors for the various land uses are multiplied by the cost per EDU to determine the proposed sewer facilities fee for each land use category. The resulting proposed fee schedules for all property within the CFD and TOD specific development are presented in Tables V -H13 and V -H14.

Table V -H13: Sewer Fee Schedule (City-wide)
Residential Pro • - EDU
Pe
IF per Ultm
Single -Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
Non -Residential Property
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel

1.000

0.571

0.500

0.500
EDU Fact
$598.98
$598.98
$598.98
$598.98

0.656

0.700

0.571
$598.98
$598.98
$598.98
$598.98
$598.98
$342.28
$299.49
$299.49
DIF per 1,000
SF/Room
Table V -H14: Sewer Fee Schedule (TOD Area)
Units
Units
Units
Units
$392.88
$392.88
$419.06
$342.28
KSF
KSF
KSF
Room
Residential Propert
DIF per
TOD - Multi -Family

0.571
$1,545.06
$882.89
Units
TOD - Commercial/Retail
TOD - Office
TOD - Industrial
TOD - Hotel/Motel

0.656

0.700

0.571
$1,545.06
$1,545.06
$1,545.06
$1,545.06
$1,013.41
$1,013.41
$1,080.95
$882.89
KSF
KSF
KSF
Room
H.6 Expected Revenue
Expected sewer facilities fee revenue is calculated by applying the proposed fee rates to projected residential units, non-residential building area, and hotel rooms associated with future development.

As shown in Tables V -H15 and V -H16, the total expected revenue represents the portion of the sewer facility costs allocated to new development.

City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
74 742

DIF per 1,000 Cost Financed
SF/Room by Fees J
www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
Table V -H15: Expected Revenue (City-wide)
Residential Property
Number of Future Residential
Units
IF per Unit
Cost Financed b
Fees
Single -Family Residential
Multi -Family Residential
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
1,525 Units
1,740 Units
90 Units
225 Units
$598.98
$342.28
$299.49
$299.49
$913,451
$595,561
$26,954
$67,386
Non -Residential Property
Number of Future Non -
Residential Building sq.
ft./Rooms
DIF per 1,00 Cost Financed
SF/Room by Fees
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
122,600 sq. ft.
35,600 sq. ft.
62,540 sq. ft.
500 Rooms
$392.88
$392.88
$419.06
$342.28
Total
Cost Allocated to Existing Development
Total Cost of Sewer Facilities
Table V -H16: Expected Revenue (TOD Area)
$48,167
$13,986
$26,208
$171,138
$1,862,851
$13,737,439
$15,600,290
Residential Proper Number of Future Residentia DIF per Unit Units
Cost Financed by
Fees
TOD - Multi -Family
1,290 Units
$882.89
$1,138,929
on- T a dential Property
Number of Future Non -
Residential Building sq.
ft./Rooms
TOD - Commercial/Retail
TOD - Office
TOD - Industrial
TOD - Hotel/Motel
50,000 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft.
0 sq. ft.
150 Rooms
$1,013.41
$1,013.41
$1,080.95
$882.89
Total
Estimated Credit Provided to Developer for Previously Mitigated Development Cost Allocated to New Development Following Credit for Redevelopment Cost Allocated to Existing Development
Total Cost of Sewer Facilities
$50,671
$15,201
$0
$132,434
$1,337,235
($175,612)
$1,161,623
$1,084,023
$2,245,646
The fee revenue shown above is expected to finance approximately 12% of the sewer facilities needed for City-wide development and approximately 52% of the sewer facilities needed for the TOD area development. Also, the estimated credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects. This City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
75 743

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

SEWER FACILITIES FEE
amount is subject to change. The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelopment is subject to. The City will need to fund the remaining costs from other sources.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
76 744

dta
www.FinanceDTA.co/
m
I Other Facilities

SECTION V

FEE CALCULATIONS

OTHER FACILITIES
This section identifies certain fees that were not calculated by DTA, but are existing fees previously analyzed and adopted by the City. These fees include the Animal Shelter Fee and Stormwater Fee. For more information, please refer to the fee study dated April 2023 prepared by SCI Consulting Group for the original Animal Shelter fee calculation and the fee study dated September 2017 prepared by SCI Consulting Group for the original Stormwater fee calculation. These fees previously analyzed and adopted by the City will not increase, except as allowed by the annual inflationary adjustment pursuant to the prior fee studies and Section 85.02.160 of the Placentia Municipal Code.

DTA has not analyzed, evaluated, or verified these fees for consistency with AB 1600. No such analysis was performed in connection with this Report. Accordingly, this Report should not be relied upon as documentation or support for the City's existing Animal Shelter Fee or Stormwater Fee. DTA assumes no responsibility or liability for the validity, adoption, implementation, or continued imposition of these existing fees.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
77 745

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

VI IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES

SECTION VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES
In addition to the legal requirements covered in Section II, a number of recommendations for the adoption and administration of the development impact fees are presented in this report. All recommendations presented in this section, unless otherwise noted, are based on the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 5166000 et seq.), also referred to as the "Act," which provides specific requirements for establishing and administering development impact fee programs. The Act also mandates procedures for administering impact fee programs, such as the collection and accounting of impact fees, refunds, mandatory updates, and reporting requirements.

At the time the City imposes an impact fee, Government Code 66020 requires a written statement of the amount of the fee and a written notice of a 90 -day period during which the imposition of the fee can be protested. Prior to the enactment of Section 66020, a developer could not challenge the validity of fees imposed on a residential development without refusing to pay them. Under these circumstances, developers were required to pay disputed fees before they could be challenged. Section 66020 was drafted to correct that problem.

The various subparts of Section 66020 allow for a procedure that permits a developer to pay the fees under protest, obtain the relevant building permit, and then proceed with the project while pursuing an action to challenge the fees. If the action is successful, the fees will be refunded with interest. However, failure to protest the imposition of the fee during the allowed period may deprive the fee payer of the right to any subsequent legal challenges. Any challenges to be filed must be submitted within 90 days of enactment. The subsequent sections provide specific guidelines for implementing development impact fees.

A The Collection of Development Impact Fees
According to Government Code Section 66007, any local agency that imposes any fees or charges on residential development for the construction of public improvements or facilities shall not require the payment of those fees or charges, notwithstanding any other provision of law, until the date of the final inspection or the date the Certificate of Occupancy is issued, whichever occurs first.

However, utility service fees may be collected when an application for utility service is received. If the residential development contains more than one dwelling, the local agency may determine whether the fees or charges shall be paid on a pro -rata basis for each dwelling when it receives its final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, on a pro -rata basis when a certain percentage of the houses have received their final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, or on a lump sum basis when the first dwelling in the development receives its final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, whichever of the three occur first.

An exception allows development impact fees to be collected at an earlier time if they are used to reimburse the agency for expenditures previously made or for public improvements City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
78 746

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES
or facilities for which money has already been appropriated. If any fee or charge specified is not fully paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction, the local agency issuing the building permit may require the property owner or lessee, if the lessee's interest appears of record, as a condition of issuance of the building permit, to execute a contract to pay the fee or charge, or applicable portion.

Statutory restrictions in place for residential development at the time when fees may be collected do not apply to non-residential development. In cases where the fees are not collected upon the issuance of building permits, Sections 6607(c)(1) and (2) provide that the City may require the property owner of a non-residential development to execute a contract to pay the fee and subsequently record that contract as a lien against the property owner.

In addition, pursuant to Government Code Section 66311.5, ADUs are exempt from incurring impact fees from local agencies if such unit is less than 750 square feet. If an ADU has more than 750 square feet of interior livable space, the impact fees shall be charged proportionally in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. The amount of the impact fee for such ADU is described in Section I.B.2 above
B The Assignment and Expenditure of Fee Revenue
According to Section 66006, if a local agency requires the payment of a fee specified in connection with the approval of a development project, the local agency receiving the fee shall deposit it with the other fees for the improvement to be funded in a separate capital facilities account or fund in a manner to avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the local agency, except for temporary investments, and expend those fees solely for the purpose for which the fee was collected. Any interest income earned in the capital facilities account or fund shall also be deposited in that account or fund and expended only for the purpose for which the fee was originally collected.

Common practice is to maintain separate funds or accounts for impact fee revenues by facility category. DTA recommends the continuation of that approach.

C Exemptions, Reductions, and Waivers.

If a project has characteristics that indicate its impact on a particular public facility or infrastructure system will be significantly and permanently smaller than the average impact used to calculate impact fees in this Fee Study, the fees should be reduced accordingly. The City may voluntarily waive or reduce the fees that would otherwise apply to a project to promote goals such as affordable housing or economic development. However, implementing this policy may not result in increased costs for other development projects and is allowed only if such costs are offset by other revenue sources.

D Developer Improvement Credits
If the City maintains a policy that requires a developer, as a condition of project approval, to construct facilities for which impact fees have been or will be charged, the impact fee imposed on that development project for that type of facility must be adjusted to reflect a credit for such dedication or construction. Furthermore, the impact fee imposed on that City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
79 747

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES
development project for that type of facility must be adjusted to reflect a credit for the cost of the facilities or improvements constructed by the developer. If circumstances allow a developer to dedicate land, buildings, or other valuable considerations in lieu of paying fees, the City maintains the discretion to accept or reject such offers and may negotiate the terms under which an offer would be accepted.

E Existing Development Credit
If a project involves replacement, redevelopment, or intensification of previously existing development, impact fees should be applied only to the portion of the project that represents a net increase in demand for relevant facilities, applying the measure of demand used in this study to calculate that particular fee. Since residential service demand is usually estimated based on -demand per dwelling unit, an addition to a single-family dwelling unit typically would not be subject to an impact fee if it does not increase the number of dwelling units in the structure. In any project that results in a net increase in the number of dwelling units, the added units would normally be subjected to impact fees. A similar analysis can be applied to non-residential development using a measure of demand on which impact fees are based.

F Annual Reporting and Accounting of Fees
AB 1600 requires that general law and charter cities account for every fee they collect under its terms. Funds collected for each capital facility or service shall be deposited in separate accounts and not commingled with any other funds for other impact fees. While funds accrue for individual capital facilities, the City must keep track of each fund and provide an annual report. Section 66006 requires that for each separate account or fund established, the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund;

2. The amount of the fee;

3. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund;

4. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned;

5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees;

6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete;

7. A description of each inter -fund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
80 748

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended and, in the case of an inter -fund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan; and

8. The amount of refunds made pursuant To Subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocations pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 66001.

The City must review the information available at the next regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after this information is made available to the public. Notice of the time and place of the meeting, including the address where this information may be reviewed, shall be mailed at least 15 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the local agency for mailed notice of the meeting.

In addition, pursuant to AB 516 which became effective January 1, 2025 and amended Govt.

Code Sections 66006 and 66023, additional reporting requirements include the following:

1. Identify any delays in construction and updated timing.

2. Fee payers have a right to request an audit of the fee to determine if fee charged exceeds the reasonable estimated cost of providing the facility.

3. Agency must provide a website link with fee account information.

4. If the agency does not have a plan to spend fees on authorized facilities, such fee amounts must be refunded. Agency must identify the amount of any refunds and names of individuals or entities to receive such refund.

G Refunding Policy
Under the Mitigation Fee Act, Govt. Code 866000 et seq., each development fee must be deposited in a separate capital facilities account and may be expended only for the purposes for which it was collected. For all unexpended fees, the agency must make findings every 5 years that:

1. Identify the purpose for which the fee will be put;

2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the unexpended balance and the purpose for which the fee was charged;

3. Ascertain the sources and funding for any as -yet -incomplete public improvements and

4. Designate the approximate date the agency expects the funding for uncompleted improvements to be deposited in the account [1ii66001(d)(1)]. The Act provides that "if the findings are not made as required by [the Act], the local agency shall refund the money in the account" to the current owners of the properties for which the fees were paid [.gi66001(d)(2)].

Failure to make the findings specified in the Mitigation Fee Act requires a refund of all unexpended development impact fees. When sufficient funds have been collected to City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
81 749

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION VI

IMPLEMENTATION OF FEES
complete financing of the public improvements contained in the CIP, the public agency shall identify "an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will be commenced" within 180 days of collecting the required funds (Gov. Code .g166001(e)].

Failure to comply with this requirement also mandates the return of the collected funds, as stated above.

Furthermore, pursuant to Gov. Code .8166008.1, otherwise known as AB 516, any fees for improvements that are collected and not expended within a reasonable time of deposit of such fees shall be returned to the qualified applicant that originally deposited the fees.

H Administration Costs of Fee Implementation
The cost of implementing the development impact fees is not included in the fees themselves and must be determined by the City. To recover the periodic costs of updating the fees studies, implementing the program, ongoing staff costs, managing the updates, and preparing annual and five-year updates required by the Act, art administration fee may be added to the impact fees calculated in this Fee Study. To recover administrative costs incurred by the City in administering the Fee program, an administrative component of 0.5% of the total fee is added to the proposed fees calculated for each facility category.

I Indexing of Impact Fee Rates
The development impact fees presented in this report are based on current facility costs provided by the City and should be adjusted annually to account for inflation. The purpose of the adjustment is to account for future escalation in costs for land, equipment, vehicles, and construction. DTA recommends that after adoption, the fee should be reviewed each year and adjusted by a reliable index such as ENR's Construction Cost Index, generally used as the primary basis for indexing construction costs. Ordinarily, land costs make up a significant portion of the costs covered by the fees and do not lend themselves to traditional cost indexes. As such, land costs should be adjusted to changes in local land prices.

J Updating the Impact Fee Study
As stated in Section II, AB 602 was signed into law in September of 2021 by the Governor of California, and it provides new Statewide requirements for local jurisdictions seeking to impose development impact fees on development projects. Among these requirements is that nexus studies shall be updated at least every 8 years as of January 1, 2023. However, DTA concurs with the generally accepted policy that 5 years is a reasonable rule -of -thumb time period for impact fee updates, particularly because the required 5 -year findings (see above) can be approved at that same time. In some instances, fees may remain valid for a longer period of time if the City's land use and facility plans do not change. A case in point is a municipality at or near full build -out capacity. However, a dynamic, growing municipality facing significant land -use changes would be a disservice if it maintained the current fee structure for too long without a Fee Study to update the current rates.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
82 750

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
VII

FEE SUMMARY

SECTION VII

FEE SUMMARY
Tables VII -1 through VII -3 below summarizes the proposed fees for the various land uses within the four facility categories. These fees represent the maximum fee that can be charged to any land use.

To recover administrative costs incurred by the City in administering the Fee program, an administrative component of 0.5% of the total fee is added to the proposed fees calculated for each facility category.

Table VII -1: Development Impact Fee Summary (Non-TOD area) Land Use
Police
Parks
Trans
portation
Single Family
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Comm./Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
$2,998.98
$2,009.53
$1,861.93
$3,705.40
$3,566.73
$1,534.57
$425.61
$1,821.88
$1,220.79
$1,131.12
Residential Property (per unit)
$1,740.36
$1,166.17
$1,080.51
$735.49
$492.83
$456.63
$963.70
$658.37
$834.36
$598.98
$342.28
$299.49
Non -Residential Property (per, 1,000 sq. ft or per hotel/motel room) $2,251.03
$2,166.79
$932.25
$258.56
$2,150.31
$2,069.84
$890.54
$246.99
NA
NA
NA
NA
$2,425.69
$830.12
$381.66
$619.14
$392.88
$392.88
$419.06
$342.28
Table VII -2: Development Impact Fee Summary (TOD area) Single Family
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Comm./Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
$2,998.98
$2,009.53
$1,861.93
$3,705.40
$3,566.73
$1,534.57
$425.61
$1,821.88
$1,220.79
$1,131.12
rans-
rtation
$44.30
$29.45
$28.32
$54.63
$45.13
$20.79
$9.46
$8,903.70
$5,919.41
$5,692.37
$10,979.94
$9,071.49
$4,178.87
$1,902.04
Residential Property (per unit)
$1,740.36
$1,166.17
$1,080.51
$735.49
$492.83
$456.63
$963.70 $598.98
$658.37 $1,225.17
$834.36 $299.49
$0.00 $44.30
$1,131.76 $39.52
$0.00 $28.32
Non -Residential Property (per, 1,000 sq. ft or per hotel/motel room) $2,251.03
$2,166.79
$932.25
$258.56
$2,150.31
$2,069.84
$890.54
$246.99
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
NA $2,425.69 $1,406.29
NA $830.12 $1,406.29
NA $381.66 $1,500.01
NA $619.14 $1,225.17
$4,169.82
$1,427.00
$656.09
$1,064.32
April 15, 2026
$80.54
$57.33
$29.48
$19.20
$8,903.70
$7,944.13
$5,692.37
$16,189.08
$11,524.10
$5,924.60
$3,858.99
83 751

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/
Table VII -3: Quimby Fee Summary
Residential Land Use from Impact Fee per
2023 US Census Data Dwelling Unit
(other than ADUs)
SFD and SFA
2-4 Plex MFA
5 Plex or greater MFA
Mobile Homes
$26,655
$26,576
$20,357
$16, 547

SECTION VII

FEE SUMMARY
At the time of permit issuance, new development shall pay the appropriate fee for each facility category, and the City shall deposit the funds in a separate account dedicated to the construction of the proposed facilities in accordance with Government Code Section 66006(a).

For purposes of determining the impact fees due, any "second unit" or "accessory dwelling unit" (as determined pursuant to Section 65852.2 of the Government Code) shall be considered a separate residential unit and shall be subject to this fee.

Every five years, the City shall report the status of the funds in accordance with Government Code Section 66001(d) and shall i) identify the purpose to which the fee is put; ii) demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charge, iii) identify the sources and amounts of funding needed to complete the program, iv) list the facilities not yet completed, and v) identify, to the extent possible, the timing of when the remaining funds are expected to be received.

It is further recommended that the City update its Capital Improvement Plan annually, by resolution of the City Council, in accordance with Government Code Section 66002.

Future development may result from intensification and/or redevelopment of existing land uses. Each such redevelopment project will be evaluated in order to calculate the applicable fees on the new proposed development, taking into account the development previously mitigated.

Finally, it is recommended that the City include in its Council Resolution to adopt the fees recommended in this Fee Study a provision to automatically increase the fees annually tied to an inflation index, such as the Engineering News -Record Construction Price Index, or some other reasonable measure of inflation.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
84 752

APPENDIX A
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study

DEMOGRAPHICS

SUMMARY
753

CITY OF PLACENTIA
DEMOGRAPHICS INFORMATION & EDU CALCULATION [1]
(FOR SEWER AND STREETSCAPE FEES)

EDU BACKUP
4/9/2026
Residential Property
Number of
Residents

1.1111/11.1.
11111111111 Residents per EDUS per Total
Residential Units Residential Unit Residential Unit Existing EDU5 Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Arrector, nweiilna 1 Initc
Non-TOD Area - Subtotal Residential
TOD Area
Multi -Family
Subtotal City -Wide Residential
111111111
Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
HoteUMotel
Non-TOD Area - Subtotal Non -Residential (Buildings)
TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
HoteUMotel
TOD Area - Subtotal Non -Residential (Buildings)
Subtotal City -Wide Non -Residential
40,556
9,705
1,476
87 51,824
1,204
53,028
13,238
3,896
776
65 17,975
633
18,608

3.06 2.49

1.90 1.34

2.88 1.90

2.85 1.000

0.813

0.621
0 437
NA

0.621
NA
13,238
3,168
482
28 16,916
393
17,309
Number of
Employees Non -Resident -
Number of Employees per EDUs per Total
SF per Room Existing EDU5
4,914
7,264
6,759
200
19,137
517
647
432
0 1,596
20,733
1,641,263
2,580,779
4,739,812
8,961,854
93,975
135,416
270,767
0 500,158
9,462,012

2.99 2.81

1.43 0.43

2.14 5.50

4.78 1.59
NA

3.19 0.977

0.919

0.465

0.142
NA

1.796

1.561

0.520
NA
NA
1,604
2,371
2,206
65 6,247
169
211
141
0 521
6,768
rand Total Cit -Wide
24,076
• esidential Property
Iiirr
Number of
Residents
Future Development (2025 - 2040)
Number of
Residential Units
Residents per
Residential Unit
EDUS per
Residential Unit Total Future EDUs
Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Arraccnrn nwaiilns I Initc
Non-TOD Area - Subtotal Residential
TOD Area
Multi -Family
Subtotal City -Wide Residential
4,672
1,121
171
301
6,265
2,451
8,716
1,525
450
90 225
2,290
1,290
3,580

3.06 2.49

1.90 1.34

2.74 1.90

2.43 1.000

0.813

0.621
5_,V7
NA

0.620
NA
1,525
366
56 98
2,045
800
2,845
on -Residential Property
Number of Number of Employees per EDUs per
Employees Non -Residential Bldg. Sq. Ft. or Rooms 1,000 Non -Res. SF or Room 1,000 Non -Res. SF per Room otal Future EDU5
Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
HoteUMotel
Non-TOD Area - Subtotal Non -Residential (Buildings)
TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
HoteUMotel
TOD Area - Subtotal Non -Residential (Buildings)
Subtotal City -Wide Non -Residential
rand Total City -Wide
189
58 357
152
756
275
72 0
65 412
756
72,600
20,600
225,000
250
318,200
50,000
15,000
0 150
65,000
383,200

2.60 2.82

1.59 0.43
NA

5.50 4.78
NA

0.43 6.34

0.850

0.919

0.518
0 142
NA

1.796

1.561
NA
0 142
NA
62 19
117
50 247
90 23
0 21
134
381
Non -Residential Property
Future Reduction (2025 - 2040)
Number of Number of Employees per
Employees Non -Residential Bldg. Sq. Ft. or Rooms 1,000 Non -Res. SF or Room 1,000 Non -Res. SF per Room Reduction in EDUs EDUs per
OD Area
Industrial
(259)
(162,460)

1.59 0.520
(85)
Grand Total
(85)
754

esidential Property
Net Future Development (2025 - 2040)
Number of Number of Residents per
Residents Residential Units Residential Unit
EDUS per
Residential Unit Total Net Future EDUS
Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Arraccnry nwall Ina Units,
Non-TOD Area - Subtotal Residential
TOD Area
Multi -Family
Subtotal City -Wide Residential
4,672
1,121
171
301
6,265
2,451
8,716
1,525
450
90 228
2,290
1,290
3,580

3.06 2.49

1.90 1344
NA

1.90 1.000

0.813

0.621

0.437
NA

0.620
1,525
366
56 98
2,045
800
2,845
Number of Number of Employees per EDUS per
Employees Non -Residential Bldg. Sq. Ft. or Rooms
1,000 Non -Res. SF or Room 1,000 Non -Res. SF per Room Total Net Future EDU Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
HoteUMotel
Non-TOD Area - Subtotal Non -Residential (Buildings)
TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
HoteUMotel
TOD Area - Subtotal Non -Residential (Buildings)
Subtotal City -Wide Non -Residential
rand Total City -Wide
189
58 357
152
756
275
72 (259)
55 153
909
72,600
20,600
225,000
350
318,200
50,000
15,000
(162,460)
150
(97,460)
220,740

2.60 2.82

1.59 0.43

2.38 5.50

4.78 1.59

0.43 NA

0.850

0.919

0.518
0 142
NA

1.796

1.561

0.520

0.142
NA
62 19
117
50 247
90 23
(85)
21 50
297
• esidential Property
Total Development (2040)
Number of Number of Residents per EDUS per
Residents Residential Units Residential Unit Residential Unit Total EDUs
Non-TOD Area
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Arra_cen , nwaiilna 1 Initc
Subtotal City -Wide Residential
TOD Area
Multi -Family
Subtotal City -Wide Residential
45,228
10,826
1,647
386
58,089
3,655
61,744
14,763
4,346
866
290
20 265
1,923
22,188

3.06 2.49

1.90 1.34

1.90 1.000

0.813

0.621
0 437

0.620
14,763
3,534
538
127
18,961
1,193
20,154
on -Residential Property
Number of Number of Employees per EDUs per
Employees Non -Residential Bldg. Sq. Ft. or Rooms 1,000 Non -Res. SF or Room 1,000 Non -Res. SF per Room Total EDUS Non-TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
HoteUMotel
Non-TOD Area - Subtotal Non -Residential (Buildings)
TOD Area
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
HoteUMotel
TOD Area - Subtotal Non -Residential (Buildings)
Subtotal City -Wide Non -Residential
5,103
7,322
7,116
352
19,893
792
719
173
65 1,749
21,642
1,713,863
2,601,379
4,964,812
8-14
9,280,054
143,975
150,416
108,307
150
402,697
9,682,751

2.98 2.81

1.43 0.43

5.50 4.78

1.59 0 43

0.00 0.972

0.919

0.468

0.142

1.796

1.561

0.520
0 142
NA
1,666
2,390
2,323
115
6,493
259
235
56 21
571
7,064
rand Total City -Wide
27,218
Ili Provided by City. City utilized City planning data and data from CA Department of Finance Table E-5, SCAG OCP 2022 Studyforyear 2025, and SCAG OCP 2022 Studyforecast for 2040. 755

APPENDIX B
City of Placentia
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
/ FEE MODELS
756

Police Fee Model
757

Table 1
Invento of Existin
Facility
Stations
Police Station
Facilities
Vehicles
Patrol Cars
Mobile Command Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Surveillance Cameras
License Plate Readers (LPRs)
Table 2
Pro osed Facilities
City of Placentia
Police Facilities
Fee Calculation
Location
401 E. Chapman
Facility Unit
Bldg SF
Vehicles
Vehicles
Vehicles
Cameras
9 Fixed, 2 Mobile
Square Feet
12,315
25 0
25 170
11 Facility
Location
Lot Size
Units
Land Acquisition
Cost
Building/Equipment
Cost
Total
Cost
New Police Station
New Police Sub -Station
Total Stations
Patrol Cars
Mobile Command Vehicle
Total Vehicles
Surveillance Cameras
License Plate Readers (LPRs)
Total Facilities Cost
Less Offsetting Revenues (Existing Fee Balance)
Net Facilities Cost
Table 3
Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development Stations & Land Acquisition
TBD
Downtown (building acquired from existing retail owner)

2.0 Acres

0.0 Acres

2.0 13,000 Bldg SF

10.000 Bldg SF
23,000 Bldg SF
5 Vehicles
1 Vehicle
6 Vehicles
43 Cameras
4 units
$5,500,000
$5,500,000
$34,532,000
$543.000
$35,075,000
$500,000
$3.000.000
$3,500,000
$225,000
$100,000
$40,032,000
$543.000
$40,575,000
$500,000

53.000,000
$3,500,000
$225,000
$100,000
$44,400,000
($245.795)
$44,154,205
Type of Development
EDUs
Percentage of
Total EDUs
Total Stations
in 2040
Allocated SF
Percentage of
Costs Allocated
Total Cost
Existing Development
Future Development
Total
Vehicles
24,076
3,142
27,218

88.46%

11.54%
100.00%
31,239
4,076
35,315
(12,315)
0 (12,315)
18,924
4,076
23,000

82.28%

17.72%
100.00%
$33,166,114
$7,163,092
$40,329,205
Type of Development
EDUs
Percentage of
Total EDUs
Total Vehicles
in 2040
Vehicles Credit
Allocated
Vehicles
Percentage of
Costs Allocated
Total Cost
Existing Development
Future Development
Total
Surveillance Cameras
24,076
3,142
27,218

88.46%

11.54%
100.00%

27.42 3.58

31.00 (25.00)

0.00 (25.00)

2.42 3.58

6.00 40.36%

59.64%
100.00%
$1,412,599
$2,087,401
$3,500,000
Typ; elopment
EDUs
Percentage of
Total EDUs
Total Cameras
in 2040
Cameras Credit
Allocated
Cameras
Percentage of
Costs Allocated
Total Cost
Existing Development
Future Development
Total
License Plate Readers (LPRs)
24,076
3,142
27,218

88.46%

11.54%
100.00%
188.41

24.59 213.00
(170.00)

0.00 (170.00)

18.41 24.59

43.00 42.82%

57.18%
100.00%
$96,347
$128,653
$225,000
Type of Development
EDUs
Percentage of
Total EDUs
Total LPRs
in 2040
LPRs Credit
Allocated
LPRs
Percentage of
Costs Allocated
Total Cost
Existing Development
Future Development
Total
24,076
3,142
27,218

88.46%

11.54%
100.00%

13.27 1.73

15.00 (11.00)

0.00 (11.00)

2.27 1.73

4.00 56.71%

43.29%
100.00%
$56,713
$43,287
$100,000
758

City of Placentia
Police Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 4
Existing Standards at Buildout
Units Allocated to Exsiting
Development at Buildout Existing EDUs
Standard per
1,000 EDUs
Existing Police Station Building Square Feet
Existing Vehicles
Existing Surveillance Cameras
Existing LPRs
Future Standards at Buildout
31,239
27 188
13 24,076
24,076
24,076
24,076
1297.47

1.1389

7.8256

0.5511
Units Allocated to Future
Development at Buildout Future EDUs
Existing Standard
per 1,000 EDUs
at Buildout
Future Standard
per 1,000 EDUs
at Buildout
Resulting Status
Police Station Building Square Feet
Vehicles
Surveillance Cameras
License Plate Readers
Table 5
Proposed Facilities and Cost Per EDU
4,076 3,142 1297.47 1297.47 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard

3.58 3,142 1.1389 1.1389 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard

24.59 3,142 7.8256 7.8256 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard

1.73 3,142 0.5511 0.5511 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard Facility
Cost
Number of Cost
Future EDUs Per EDU
Stations
Vehicles
Surveillance Cameras
License Plate Readers
Total
Table 6
Develo.ment Im act Fee per Unit or 1,000 SF or Room
$7,163,092
$2,087,401
$128,653
$43,287
$9,422,433
3,142
3,142
3,142
3,142
NA
$2,279.87
$664.38
$40.95
$13.78
$2,998.98
Land Use Type
EDUs per
Unit [2]
EDUs per
1,000 SF / Room [2]
Future Units /
1,000 SF / Rooms
Fees per
Unit
Fees per 1,000 SF /
Room
Cost Financed
by DIF
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel

1.000

0.670

0.621

0.437
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,525
1,740
90 225
NA 1.236 123
NA 1.189 36
NA 0.512 225
NA 0.142 500
Cost Allocated to Future Development (Excluding Credits from Redevelopment) Estimated Credit Provided to Developer for Previously Mitieated Development of TOD-Industrial Buildinus Cost Allocated to Future Development Following Credit for Redevelopment Cost Allocated to Existin: Develo s ment
$2,998.98
$2,009.53
$1,861.93
$1,310.22
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
$4,573,445
$3,496,581
$167,574
$294,800
$3,705.40 $454,283
$3,566.73 $126,976
$1,534.57 $345,278
$425.61 $212,805
$1,534.57
$9,671,740
($249,307) *
$9,422,433
$34,731,772
Total Cost of Police Facilities
$44,154,205
* Credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects; subject to change. The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelpment is subject to. 759

Fire Fee Model
760

City of Placentia
Fire Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 1
Invento ofExistin• Facilities
Facility Location Facility Unit Square Feet
Stations
Station 1
Station 2
Fire Admin Headauarters
Total Existing Fire Stations
Vehicles
Primary Engine at Station 1
Primary Truck at Station 2
Primary Engine at Station 2
Total Vehicles
Table 2
Pro osed Facilities
110 S. Bradford Ave.
1530 Valencia Ave.
120 S. Bradford Ave.

Bldg SF
Bldg SF
Bldg SF
Bldg SF
Vehicles
Vehicles
Vehicles
Vehicles
3,500
6,039
3 100
12,639
3 Facility Location
Land Acquisition Building/Equipment Total
Lot Site Units Cost Cost Cost
New Fire Station 3 TBD
Eauinment for new Station 3: Self Contained Breathina Annaratus. Washer. Tools Plvmovement. IT Total Stations/Buildings
Fire Truck
Total Vehicles
Total Facilities Cost
Less Offsettine Revenues (Existine Fee Balance)
Net Facilities Cost
Table 3
Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development Stations & Land Ac.uisition
1 ype of Development "I
Existing Development
Future Development
Total
Vehicles: En•ine/Trucks
EDUs
Percentage of
Total EDUs
24,076 88.46%
3,142 11.54%
27,218 100.00%

1.6 Acres
Total Stations
in 2040
20,026
2,613
22,639
10,000 Bldg SF
1 Vehicle
1 Vehicle
SF Credit
(12,639)
0 (12,639)
$4,400,000
$13,000,000
$17,400,000
$1,000,000
$18,400,000
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
$2,000,000
$20,400,000
($67,199)
$20,332,801
Percentage of
Allocated SF Costs Allocated Total Cost
7,387
2,613
10,000

73.87%

26.13%
100.00%
$13,532,137
$4,800,664
$18,332,801
ype of Development
L
Percentage of
Total EDUs
Total Vehicles
in 2040 Vehicles Credit
Allocated Percentage of
Vehicles Costs Allocated
Total Cost
Existing Development
Future Development
Total
24,076 88.46%
3,142 11.54%
27,218 100.00%

3.54 0.46

4.00 (3.00)

0.00 (3.00)

0.54 0.46

1.00 53.83%

46.17%
100.00%
$1,076,541
$923,459
$2,000,000

Table 4
Existin• Standards at Buildout
Existing Fire Station Building Square Feet
Existing Engines/Trucks
Future Standards at Buildout
City of Placentia
Fire Facilities
Fee Calculation
Units Allocated to Exsiting
Development at Buildout
20,026

3.54 Existing EDUs

24.076
24,076
Standard per
1,000 EDUs
831.75

0.1470
Fire Station Building Square Feet
Engines/Trucks
Existing Standard Future Standard
Units Allocated to Future per 1,000 EDUs per 1,000 EDUs Development at Buildout Future EDUs at Buildout at Buildout Resulting Status 2,613 3,142 831.75 831.75 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard

0.46 3,142 0.1470 0.1470 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard Table 5
Proposed Facilities and Cost Per EDU
Stations
Engines/Trucks
Total
Table 6
Develo.ment Impact Fee .er Unit or 1,000 SF or Room
Land
$4,800,664
$923,459
$5,724,123
3,142
3,142
NA
$1,527.96
$293.92
$1,821.88
EDUs per EDUs per
Unit [2] 1,000 SF / Room [2]
Future Units / Fees per
1,000 SF / Rooms Unit
Fees per 1,000 SF /
Room
Cost Financed
by DIF
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel

1.000

0.670

0.621

0.437
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,525
1,740
90 225
$1,821.88
$1,220.79
$1,131.12
$795.96
NA
NA
NA
NA
$2,778,365
$2,124,171
$101,801
$179,091
NA 1.236 123 NA $2,251.03 $275,976
NA 1.189 36 NA $2,166.79 $77,138
NA 0.512 225 NA $932.25 $209,756
NA 0.142 500 NA $258.56 $129,279
Cost Allocated to Future Development (Excluding Credits from Redevelopment) Estimated Credit Provided to Developer for Previously Mitieated Development of TOD-Industrial Buildines Cost Allocated to Future Development Following Credit for Redevelopment Cost Allocated to Existin Develo.ment
$932.25
$5,875,576
($151,454) *
$5,724,123
$14,608,678
Total Cost of Fire Facilities
$20,332,801
* Credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects; subject to change. The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelpment is subject to.

General Government Fee Model
763

City of Placentia
General Government Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 1
Invento ofExistin• Facilities
Facility
Location
Facility Unit
Square Feet
Existing City Hall
Table 2
Pro osed Facilities
401 E Chapman Ave.

Bldg SF
22,735
Facility
Location
Lot Size
Units
Land Acquisition
Cost
Building
Cost
Equipment Total
Cost Cost
City Hall Expansion (Equipment)
City Hall Expansion (Equipment)
City Hall Expansion (Equipment)
City Hall Expansion (Equipment)
City Hall Expansion (Eauinment)
City Hall Expansion
Total Facilities Cost
Less Offsettine Revenues (Existine Fee Balance'
Net Facilities Cost
401 E Chapman Ave.

Table 3
Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development Ci Hall Ex ansion
Type of Development EDUs
Existing Developmen
Future Development
1 Total
24,076
3,142
27,218

2.45 Acres
Percentage of
Total EDUs

88.46%

11.54%
100.00%
50 8
3 3
60 17,265
Total Sq. Ft.
in 2040
35,383
4,617
40,000
PCs
Wireless APs
Network Switches
Servers
VOIP Desk Phones
Bldg SF
SF Credit
(22,735)
0 (22,735)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,737,500
S13,570,290
Percentage of
Allocated SF Costs Allocated
12,648
4,617
17,265

73.26%

26.74%
100.00%
$50,000
$3,200
$30,000
$75,000
$9,000
$167,200
Total Cost
$14,939,786
$5,468,005
$20,407,791
$50,000
$3,200
$30,000
$75,000
$9,000
$20,474,990
$20,474,990
($67,199)
$20,407,791

Table 4
Existin Standards
Existing City Hall Square Feel
Future Standards
City of Placentia
General Government Facilities
Fee Calculation
Units Allocated to Exsiting
Standard per
Development at Buildout Existing EDUs 1,000 EDUs
35 335.383
24,076
1469.60
Units Allocated to Future
Existing Standard
per 1,000 EDUs
Development at Buildout Future EDUs at Buildout
Future Standard
per 1,000 EDUs
at Buildo Resulting Status
Expansion Building Square Feet
Table 5
Proposed Facilities and Cost Per EDU
1 Facil
City Hall Expansion
Total
Table 6
Develo ment Impact Fee per Unit or 1,000 SF or Room
4,617 3,142 1469.60 1469.60 Future Standard Equal to Existing Standard Number of
Future EDUs
Cost
Per EDU
Land Use
EDUs per EDUs per
Future Units /
Fees per
Unit [2] 1,000 SF / Room [2] 1,000 SF / Rooms Unit
Fees per 1,000 SF / Cost Financed
Room by DIF
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel

1.000

0.670

0.621

0.437
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,525
1,740
90 225
$1,740.36
$1,166.17
$1,080.51
$760.34
NA
NA
NA
NA
$2,654,051
$2,029,128
$97,246
$171,078
NA 1.236 123 NA $2,150.31 $263,628
NA 1.189 36 NA $2,069.84 $73,686
NA 0.512 225 NA $890.54 $200,371
NA 0.142 500 NA $246.99 $123,494
Cost Allocated to Future Development (Excluding Credits from Redevelopment) Estimated Credit Provided to Develoner for Previously Mitieated Development of TOD-Industrial BuildineE Cost Allocated to Future Development Following Credit for Redevelopmeni Cost Allocated to Existin Development
$890.54
$5,612,682
($144,677) *
$5,468,005
$14,939,786
Total Cost of Fire Facilities
$20,407,791
* Credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects; subject to change. The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelpment is subject to.

Parks Fee Model
766

City of Placentia
Parks and Recreation Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 1
Invento of Existim Facilities
Facility
Location Facility Unit Acres / Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Parks
Bradford Park
Champions Sports Complex
Goldenrod Park
Jaycee Parkette
Koch Park
Kraemer Memorial Park
La Placita Parkette
McFadden Park
Parque del Arroyo Verde
Parque de los Ninos
Parque de Los Vaqueros
Richard Samp Park
Santa Fe Park
Tuffree Hill Park
Waener Park
Total
Buildings
Aguirre Building
Backs Community Center
Cathy Torres Teen Center
Edwin T. Powell (Senior Center)
Gomez Community Center
Koch Recreation Center
Tynes Gym
Whitten Community Center
Total
Table 2
I?xisting Standards
Existing Park Acreage
Existing Park Buildings
Table 2
Pro . osed Facilities
136 E. Palm Circle
505 Jefferson St.
925 Goldenrod St.
500 Kansas St.
2210 N. Valencia Ave.
201 N. Bradford Ave.
900 Gonzales St.
900 S. Melrose St.
1001 E. Palm Dr.
1701 Atwood Ave.
1200 N. Carlsbad St.
600 Loyola Dr.
550 W. Santa Fe Ave.
2101 N. Tuffree Blvd.
700 Trumpet Ave.
505 Jefferson St.
201 N. Bradford Ave.
201 N. Bradford Ave.
143 S. Bradford Ave.
1701 Atwood Ave.
2210 N. Valencia Ave.
2101 N. Tuffree Blvd.
900 S. Melrose St.

Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Bldg. Sq. Ft.

Blde. So. Ft.

Existing Units Existing Residents

63.97 43,823
53,028
53,028

1.70 13.33

2.50 0.04

4.30 11.41

0.09 3.90

4.40 3.80

5.40 3.40

1.10 6.80

1.80 63.97
5,125
10,716
1,947
4,732
3,885
1,640
6,500
9 278
43,823
Standard per
1,000 Residents

1.21 826.41
Facility
Location
Facilities /Equipment
Cost
ADA sidwalk Safety Improvement,
Fencing Safety Improvements
Sports Netting at Champions Sports Complex
Champions Sports Complex park lighting
Solar Bollards at Kraemer, McFadden, Los Ninos for walking paths Mcfadden Park walking path, mini pitch Improvements
Parque de Los Vaqueros playground
Dog Park (Tori Hunter or Richard Samps Park)
Restroom Pre -Fab Expansion
Cement Fix and Shade Sails at Pickleball Staging Area
Kraemer Memorial Park Playground Expansion
Kraemer Middle School Lights Improvements
Richard Samp Playground Expansion
Aguirre Rental Facility Expansion
Whitten Community Center Kitchen Expansion
Whitten Community Center Flooring in Kids Room, AV Equipment wiring Mcfadden Pool expansion, staff office expansion
Tuffree Gymnasium Expansion
Backs Community Center Exnansion
Total Buildings
Master Plan
Total Facilities Cost
Less Offsettine Revenues (Existing Fee Balance)
Net Facilities Cost
Multiple Locations
Multiple Locations
505 Jefferson St.
505 Jefferson St.

Multiple Locations
900 S. Melrose St.
1200 N. Carlsbad St.

Multiple Locations
Multiple Locations
Multiple Locations
201 N. Bradford Ave.
645 N. Angelina Dr.
600 Loyola Dr.
505 Jefferson St.
900 S. Melrose St.
900 S. Melrose St.
900 S. Melrose St.
2101 N. Tuffree Blvd
201 N. Bradford Ave
$3,000,000
$1,200,000
$65,000
$1,000,000
$300,000
$1,200,000
$350,000
$85,000
$1,800,000
$175,000
$510,000
$1,000,000
$350,000
$45,000
$90,000
$120,000
$1,250,000
$225,000
$2 500 000
$15,265,000
$300,000
$15,565,000
($741,801)
$14,823,199
767

Table 4
Allocation of Facilities to Existing and New Development Land Ac
■
uisition & Facilities Costs
Type of Development
Existing Residential Development
Future Residential Development
Total
Table 5
Pro osed Facilities and Cost Per EDU
City of Placentia
Parks and Recreation Facilities
Fee Calculation
EDUs
17,309
2,845
20,154
Percentage of
Total EDUs

85.88%

14.12%
100.00%
Costs Allocated
$12,730,644
$2,092,554
$14,823,199
Total
Cost
$2,092,554
Number of
Future EDUs
2,845
Cost
Per EDU
$735.49
Table 6
Develo.ment Im act Fee er Unit
Land Use Type
EDUs per EDUs per
Unit [2] 1,000 SF / Room [2]
Future Units /
1,000 SF / Rooms
Fees per
Unit
Fees per 1,000 SF /
Room
Cost Financed
by DIF
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Homes
Accessory Dwelling Units
Cost Allocated to Future Development

1.000

0.670

0.621

0.437
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,525
1,740
90 225
$735.49
$492.83
$456.63
$321.33
NA
NA
NA
NA
$1,121,628
$857,530
$41,097
$72,299
$2,092,554
Cost Allocated to Existin• Develo.menl
Total Cost of Parks Facilities
$12,730,644

Quimby Fee Model
769

Formula (Quimby park in -lieu of land dediction fee)
Fee = [(Total Costs per Acre) x (City Park Standard) x Density per unit 1/ 1,000 Part I
Cost of Land per Acre = $2,750,000
Part II
City Park Standard per 1,000 Residents 3.00 Acres [2]
Part III
Number of Existing Residents
Number of Existing Units
Density per Unit

SFD & SFA
39,023
12,078

3.2309
2-4 Plex
4,149
1,288

3.2213
3/30/2026
City of Placentia
Quimby Fee Calculation
5 -flex or more Mobile Homes Total
7,168 1,420 51,760 (From 2023 US Census Data per Quimby) [3] 2,905 708 16,979 (From 2023 US Census Data per Quimby) [4]

2.4675 2.0056 3.0485
Part IV
Fee Der Residential Unit SFD & SFA 2-4 Plex 5 -flex or more Mobile Homes Total Costs per Acre $2,750,000 $2,750,000 $2,750,000 $2,750,000 per acre x City Park Standard 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Acres per 1,000 residents x Density per Unit 3.2309 3.2213 2.4675 2.0056 Residents per Unit / 1,000
Fee per Residential Dwelling Unit $26,655 $26,576 $20,357 $16,547 per Unit [1] Estimated fair market value of land for parks provided by City 1/13/2026. [2] Limited to 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents as defined in Quimby Act. City General Plan defines a target standard at 4.0 acres per 1,000 residents. [3] Based on population for the City of Placentia indicated in the 2023 ACS 1 -Year Estimates Report #B25033 from US Census Data. [4] Based on unit counts for the City of Placentia indicated in the 2023 ACS 1 -Year Estimates Report #B25032 from US Census Data. 770

Transportation Fee Model
771

City of Placentia
Transportation Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 1
Pro osed Facilities
Project Name Scope Facility Cost
Lakeview Ave at Miraloma
Van Buren St at Orchard Dr
Placentia Ave at Santa Fe
Kraemer Rd at Connecticut Way
Miraloma at Van Buren
Class I Shared -Use Path
Class II Bike Lane
Class IIIB Buffered Bike Lane
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard
Class IV Separated Bikeway
Class IV Separated Bikeway
Placentia Ave/Crowther Ave
Orangethorpe Ave/Placentia Ave
Orangethorpe Ave/SR-57 Northbound Ramps
Orangethorpe Ave/Melrose Si
Kraemer Blvd/Orangethorpe Ave
Total Facilities Cost
Table 2
Existin • Develo . ment ADTs
Install Traffic Signals
Install Traffic Signals
Install Traffic Signals
Install Traffic Signals
Install Traffic Signals
Install 2 miles of Class I Bike lanes
Install 1.2 miles of Class II Bike Lanes
Install 5.4 miles of Class IIIB Buffered Bike Lanes
Install 7.2 miles of Class IIIB Bike Blvds
Install 8.5 miles of Class IV Bikeways
Install 8.5 miles of Class IV Bikeways
Street improvements along Placentia/Crowthei
Street improvements along Orangethorpe/Placentia
Street improvements along Orangethorpe/57 N fwy ramps
Street improvements along Orangethorpe/Melrose
Street improvements along Kraemer/Orangethorpe
$210,800
$210,800
$204,600
$291,400
$195,300
$3,240,000
$165,500
$8,208,000
$4,456,800
$9,139,200
$975,800
$124,000
$558,000
$310,000
$124,000
$124,000
$28,538,200
Land Use
Residential Unitsi
Non -Residential Square Feet (KSF;
Average Daily Trips
(ADTs)
Total ADTs
Residential
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Table 3
Future Develo . ment ADTs
13,238
4,529
776
65 1,735
2,716
5,011
460

9.09 6.21

7.87 4.55

22.88 7.83

3.60 5.84
Total Existing Developemnt
% of Total
120,333
28,125
6,107
295
39,702
21,268
18,038
2,686
236,556

87.88%
Land Use
Residential Unitsi
Non -Residential Square Feet (KSF;
Average Daily Trips
(ADTs)
Total ADTs
Residential
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
1,525
1,740
90 225

9.09 6.21

7.87 4.55
123 22.88
36 7.83
63 3.60
500 5.84
Total New Developemnt
% of Total
Total Development ADTs
13,862
10,805
708
1,023
2,805
279
225
2,920
32,628

12.12%
269,183
3/12/2026

Table 4
Cost .er ADT
Table 5
Fee Schedule
City of Placentia
Transportation Facilities
Fee Calculation
Total Cost
$28,538,200
% Allocated to New Development

12.12%
Cost Allocated to New
Development
$3,459,101
New ADTs Cost per ADT
32,628 $106.02
3/12/2026
Land Use
ADTs per Unit
MIDTs per 1,000 sq. ft. / room Future Units / 1,000 SF�I Maximum Fee Units Cost Financed by DIF Rooms
Residential
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Cost Allocated to Future Development (Excluding Credits from Redevelopment) Credit Provided to Develoner for Previouarlv Mitigated Development of TOD-Industrial Buildings Cost Allocated to Future Development Following Credit for Redevelopment Cost Allocated to Existin
Devel
ment
Total Cost of Transportation Facilities

9.09 6.21

7.87 4.55
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,525
1,740
90 225
$963.70 per Unit
$658.37 per Unit
$834.36 per Unit
$481.85 per Unit
$1,469,645
$1,145,565
$75,092
$108,416

22.88 123 $2,425.69 per 1,000 sq. ft. $297,389

7.83 36 $830.12 per 1,000 sq. ft. $29,552

3.60 225 $381.66 per 1,000 sq. ft. $85,874

5.84 500 $619.14 per room $309 572
$3,521,106
$381.66 $ per KSF
($62,005) *
$3,459,101
$25,079,099
$28,538,200
* Credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects; subject to change. The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelpment i subject to.

Streetscape Fee Model
(TOD Area)
774

City of Placentia
Streetscape Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 1
Pro osed Facilities
Project Name
Scope
Facility
Cost (TOD Only)
TOD Streetscape Improvements
Total Facilities Cost
Offsetting Revenues
Total Facilities Cos1
Table 2
Streetscape Improvement:
$4,100,000
$4,100,000
($877,937)
$3,222,063
Existin Develo sment EDUs TOD Onl '
Land Use
Residential Units/ Average Daily Trips
Non -Residential Square Feet (KSF' (ADTs)
Total ADTs
Residential
Multi -Family
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Table 3
Future Develo.ment EDUs TOD Onl '
633
94 135
271
0 Total Existing Developemnt (TOD Only;
% of Total

6.21 22.88

7.83 3.60

5.84 3,931
2,150
1,060
975
8,116

45.91%
0 Land Use
Residential Units/ Average Daily Trips
Non -Residential Square Feet (KSF' (ADTs)
Total ADTs
Residential
Multi -Family
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
1,290

6.21 8,011
50 22.88 1,144
15 7.83 117
(162) 3.60 (585)
150 5.84 876
Total New Developemnt (TOD Only; 9,563
% of Total 54.09%
Total Development 17,680
3/12/2026

City of Placentia
Streetscape Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 4
Cost ser ADT TOD Onl
Total Cost
$3,222,063
% Allocated to New Development Cost Allocated to New New ADTs Cost per ADT Development

54.09% $1,742,920 9,563 $182.25
Table 5
Fee Schedule
Residential
Multi -Family
3/12/2026
Land Use
Cost per ADT
Average Daily Trips Maximum Fee
Units Cost Financed by DIF
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Cost Allocated to Future Development (Excluding Credits from Redevelopmenl Credit Provided to Developer for Development of TOD-Industrial Building, Cost Allocated to Future Development Following Credit for Redevelopmer Cost Allocated to Existin_ Develo omen
$182.25 6.21 $1,131.76 $per Unit
$182.25
$182.25
$182.25
$182.25

22.88 7.83

3.60 5.84
$4,169.82 $ per KSF
$1,427.00 $ per KSF
$656.09 $ per KSF
$1,064.32 $ per Unit
$656.09 $ per KSF
$1,459,964
$208,491
$21,405
$0
$159 649
$1,849,508
($106.5891 *
$1,742,920
$1,479,143
Total Cost of Streetscape TOD Facilities
$3,222,063
* Credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects; subject to change. The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelpment is subject to.

Sewer Fee Model
(City-wide)
777

City of Placentia
Sewer Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 1
Pro osed Facilities
Project Location - Capacity Increase
Facility
Cost
Bradford Ave, Orange Grove Ave, Walnut Ave, Santa Barbara St, Placentia Ave Twilight St, Sunrise Way, Sunrise St, Melody Ln, Chapman Ave, Placentia Ave Orangethorpe Ave
Orangethorpe Ave, Melrose St, Silverlake Dr, Glenlake Dr Tuffree Blvd
Bastanchury Rd
Total Facilities Cost
Table 2
Existing Development EDUs
$6,837,228
$2,478,606
$1,232,652
$3,533,898
$937,052
$580,854
$15,600,290
4/6/2026
Land Use
Residential Use Factor Non Residential Use
Residential Units Non Residential ksf Factor EDU Factor EDUs (gpd per unit)
mid .erks
Residential
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Table 3
Future Develo
ment EDUs
Land Use Residential Units
Residential
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
13,238
4,529
776
65 210.00
120.00
105.00
105.00

1.000

0.571

0.500

0.500
13,238
2,588
388
33 1,735 137.74 0.656 1,138
2,716 137.74 0.656 1,782
5,011 146.92 0.700 3,505
460 120.00 0.571 263
Total Existing Developemnt 22,935
% of Total 88.06%

1.525

1.740
90 225
500
Non Residential ksf
Water Use Factor (gpd
per unit or ksf)
210.00
120.00
105.00
105.00
EDU Factor E

1.000

0.571

0.500

0.500
1,525
994
45 113
123 137.74 0.656 80
36 137.74 0.656 23
63 146.92 0.700 44
120.00 0.571 286
Total Future Developemnt (Non-TOD) 3,110
% of Total 11.94%
Total Development 26,045

4/6/2026
City of Placentia
Sewer Facilities
Fee Calculation
Table 4
Cost ser EDU
Total Cost
$15,600,290
% Allocated to New Cost Allocated to New
Development Development

11.94% $1,862,851
New EDUs Cost per EDU
3,110 $598.98
Table 5
Fee Schedule
Land Use
EDUs per Unit
EDUs per 1,000 sq. ft. / room Future Units / 1,000 SF
/ Rooms
Maximum Fee
Cost Financed by DIF
Residential
Single Family Residential
Multi -Family
Mobile Home
Accessory Dwelling Units
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Cost Allocated to Future Development
Cost Allocated
o Existin
Develo . men
Total Cost of Sewer Facilities

1.000

0.571

0.500

0.500
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

0.656

0.700

0.571
1,525
1,740
90 225
$598.98 per Unit
$342.28 per Unit
$299.49 per Unit
$299.49 per Unit
123 $392.88 per 1,000 sq. ft.
36 $392.88 per 1,000 sq. ft.
63 $419.06 per 1,000 sq. ft.
500 $342.28 per room
$913,451
$595,561
$26,954
$67,386
$48,167
$13,986
$26,208
$171,138
$1,862,851
$13,737,439
$15,600,290

Sewer Fee Model
(TOD Area)
780

Table 1
Pro osed Facilities
Project Location - Capacity Increase
Facility
Cost (TOD Only)
TOD/Old Town CIP Project Cost (Crowther Ave)
Total Facilities Cosi
Table 2
Existing Develo ment EDUs TOD Onl
Residential
Multi -Family
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Table 3
Future Develo
Land Use
ment EDUs TOD Onl
Land Use
Residential
Multi -Family
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
$2,245,646
$2,245,646
Residential Units /
Hotel Rooms
633
0 Residential Units /
Hotel Rooms
1,290
150
3/12/2026
City of Placentia
Sewer Facilities - TOD Calculation
Fee Calculation
Non Residential
Non Residential Buildings Residential Water Use
Water Use Factor
(1,000 SF) Factor (gpd per unit) (gpd per ksf)
120.00
EDU Factor

0.571
94 137.74 0.656
135 137.74 0.656
271 146.92 0.700
120.00 0.571
Total Existing Developemnt (TOD Only;
% of Total
estdential Water Use Non Residential
Non Residential Buildings actor (gpd per unit or Water Use Factor EDU Factor E (1,000 SF) ksfl (gpd per ksf)
120.00

0.571
50 137.74 0.656
15 137.74 0.656
(162) 146.92 0.700
120.00 0.571
Total Future Developemnt (TOD Only;
% of Total
Total Developmeni
362
62 89
189
0 702

48.27%
737
33 10
(114)
86 752

51.73%
1,453

City of Placentia
Sewer Facilities - TOD Calculation
Fee Calculation
Table 4
Cost per EDU (TOD Only)
Total Cost
% Allocated to New
Develo .ment
Cost Allocated to New
Develo . ment
New EDUs Cost per EDU
Table 5
Fee Schedule
Residential
Multi -Family
$2,245,646
Land Use

51.73%1
$1,161,6231
752 1
EDUs per Unit EDUs per 1,000 sq. ft. / room Future Units / 1,000 SF / Rooms

0.571
Non Residential
Commercial/Retail NA
Office NA
Industrial NA
Hotel/Motel NA
Cost Allocated to Future Development (excluding credits for redevelopment Credit provided to developer for redevelopment of TOD - Industrial Building Cost Allocated to Future Development following credit for redevelopmen Cost Allocated to Existin l Develo
Total Cost of Sewer TOD Facilities
meni
NA

0.656

0.700

0.571
1,290
$1,545.061
Maximum Fee
$882.89 per Unit
50 $1,013.41 per 1,000 sq. ft.
15 $1,013.41 per 1,000 sq. ft.
0 $1,080.95 per 1,000 sq. ft.
150 $882.89 per room
$1 080.95 per 1.000 sa. ft.
3/12/2026
$1,138,929
$50,671
$15,201
$0
$132,434
$1,337,235
($175,612) *
$1,161,623
$1,084,023
$2,245,646
* Credit amount represents the maximum credit based on current expectations of future redevelopment projects; subject to change. The credit amount for a particular redevelopment project cannot exceed the amount of new fees the redevelpment is subject to.

0 www.FinanceDTA.com
18201 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 220
IRVINE, CA 92612
PHONE: (800) 969-4DTA
Public Finance
Public -Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
783

•
www.FinanceDTA.com

AFFORDABLE HOUSING

IN -LIEU FEE

RESIDENTIAL

JUSTIFICATION STUDY

CITY OF PLACENTIA
Report Date: April 15, 2026
Public Finance
Public -Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
Irvine / San Jose / San Francisco / Riverside
Dallas / Houston / Raleigh / Tampa
784

dta
/ 18201 Von }Carman Avenue, Suite 220
www.FinanceDTA.com Irvine, CA 92612

CITY OF PLACENTIA

AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN -LIEU FEE

RESIDENTIAL

JUSTIFICATION STUDY
785

TABLE

OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE
I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A In -Lieu Fee Summary 1
B Annual Escalation Factors 2
II INTRODUCTION 3
A Overview of Methodology 3

III LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES 4

IV LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHIC ASSUMPTIONS
8 A Land Use Definitions and Employment
Densities 8
B Worker Household 9
C Industry Sectors 10
D Income Distribution of Worker Households 12
E Worker Households by Income Level 16
✓ AFFORDABILITY GAP AND IN -LIEU FEE
CALCULATION 17
A Affordability Gap 17
B Fee Calculation 18
VI FEE IMPLEMENTATION 20
A Administering a Fee Program 20
B Indexing the In -Lieu Fee 20
C Phase -In Schedule for Fee 20
D Waivers, Exemptions, and Refunds
Overview 20
786

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In order to adequately plan for new development and quantify the need for Affordable Housing and related costs associated with the direct and cumulative impacts of new development, DTA was retained by the City of Placentia (the "City") to prepare this residential nexus analysis (the "Fee Study") and accompanying report for the City to establish a basis for a proposed residential in -lieu fee (the "In -lieu Fee"). The proposed fee would be levied on new residential development within the City to mitigate the impact of such development on demand for affordable housing for the local workforce. The purpose of the Fee Study is to provide a legally defensible analysis of the "nexus" between new residential development projects, the additional employment generated as a result of residential spending, the resulting new worker households and their income distributions, and ultimately an estimate of those households that will need affordable housing. Importantly, the analysis examines the cost of delivering housing for households earning up to 120% of the Area Median Income ("AMI") and evaluates the maximum feasible fee per unit for residential development, which is required to support the provision of such housing.

A In -Lieu Fee Summary
The Fee Study establishes a connection among new residential land uses, increased spending that introduces new workers, and the housing demand generated by those new workers. Given that some of these workers may belong to lower-income households, a portion of the resulting housing demand must be met by affordable housing options. The analysis begins by categorizing residential land uses into four distinct types: Single Family Detached, Townhomes, Condominiums, and Apartments. These categories are not exhaustive but serve as prototypes for determining the potential impacts on the City and providing guidance on the City's affordable housing goals and objectives. The subsequent analysis proceeds with the following calculations:
■ The average sales prices for each residential land use type are determined. ■ Anticipated average income levels for each residential land use type are estimated based on the anticipated mortgage and other home payments, required for each of the residential land use types.
■ Household spending in the City is estimated based on the income level and the data published by the Consumer Expenditure Survey.
■ Employee generation numbers based on household expenditure for each residential category are determined using data from Impact Analysis for Planning ("IMPLAN"). ■ Occupational and income information for each occupation is used to determine the distribution of jobs within each such occupation, with particular focus on the jobs with compensation levels addressed in the analysis.
■ New jobs are adjusted to new households, using area -specific demographic information on the number of workers per household.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
1 787

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The number of Extremely Low, Very Low-, Low-, and Moderate -Income households generated by the new development is calculated, and coefficients of households per square foot of building area are generated.

The number of lower-income households per square foot is multiplied by the "Affordability Gap", or the cost of delivering housing units affordable to these income groups, to generate the maximum In -Lieu Fee for the residential land uses.

The resulting fees are summarized in Table ES -1 below. This table presents the maximum legally justifiable fees as determined by the Fee Study. These totals reflect the maximum impact fees that may be assessed on new residential construction to address its contribution to affordable housing needs. They are not proposed fee levels; they represent only the upper limits identified through this analysis.

Table ES -1: In -Lieu Fee Summary
Land Use Type
Maximum Justifiable
Fee (Per Unit)
Single Family Detached
Townhome
Condominium
Apartment
B Annual Escalation Factors
$32,984
$24,306
$21,983
$19,410
The cost estimates for the In -Lieu Fee calculated in this Fee Study are stated in 2026 dollars.

DTA further recommends that, after adoption, the above fees be reviewed each year and adjusted based upon a reliable index such as the Engineering News -Record ("ENR") Construction Cost Index ("CCI"), generally used as the primary basis for indexing construction costs.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housingln-Lieu Fee Justification Study
2 788

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

II INTRODUCTION

SECTION II

INTRODUCTION
A Overview of Methodology
The Fee Study is based on the premise that new residential land uses generate additional economic activity through their spending, and this activity generates new employment for workers who will have a range of household incomes. The City has determined that many of these new workers will not be able to afford market -rate housing in the future.

Consequently, the increase in lower-income worker households without access to affordable housing is considered a direct impact of new residential development. To address this, the proposed mitigation fee (the "In -Lieu Fee") is intended to generate revenue that supports the development of housing affordable to these new lower-income households.

This section provides an overview of the Fee Study. Each step is summarized below and discussed in more detail in the following sections:
• Section I: Executive Summary
• Section II: Introduction
• Section III: Legal Framework
This section provides a detailed discussion on the legal framework utilized to justify the imposition and collection of the fee.
• Section IV: Land Use and Demographic Assumptions
The Fee Study analyzes four residential land use categories that represent key prototypes of anticipated future development in the City. For each defined land use type, the Fee Study calculates the average sales price and, in turn, estimates the household income, the average household spending in the City, and the resulting job creation. Recognizing that most households include more than one worker, the study converts these employment figures into worker households to determine the total number generated by each land use. Finally, the Fee Study estimates the distribution of new worker households by income level by applying the income profiles to the total household counts.
• Section V: Financing Gap per Affordable Unit & Maximum Legal Fee Calculation This Section evaluates the economic viability of constructing a market -rate dwelling unit versus a dwelling unit with rents affordable to a Moderate -Income or Low - Income Household, to determine the affordability gap. This gap is then applied to the total housing need by income level to calculate the maximum legal fee. • Section VI: Fee Implementation
This section presents policy recommendations for implementation, administration, and other considerations.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
3 789

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

III LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
The imposition of impact fees is one authorized method of financing the facilities necessary to mitigate the impact of new development, including affordable housing. A fee is "a monetary exaction, other than a tax or special assessment, which is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project..." (California Government Code, Section 66000).

AB 1600, which created Section 66000 et seq. of the Government Code, was enacted by the State of California in 1987. Although AB 1600 does not specifically require an Affordable Housing Fee to be established under its provisions, the City has nevertheless calculated and documented the fee in a manner consistent with AB 1600's nexus and proportionality requirements. In doing so, the City has prepared the fee analysis to demonstrate a reasonable relationship among the impacts of new development, the resulting demand for affordable housing, and the fee being imposed. This approach is intended to ensure the fee is supported by a robust and defensible methodology. Furthermore, while AB 1600 is not the source of authority requiring adoption of the Affordable Housing Fee, its principles provide a useful and credible basis for demonstrating that the fee is reasonably justified, proportionate, and tied to the public impacts associated with development.

A fee may be levied for each type of capital improvement required for new development, with payment typically due prior to the start of construction of a dwelling unit or non- residential building. Fees are often levied at final map recordation, upon the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or more commonly, at building permit issuance.

In 2006, Government Code Section 66001 was amended to clarify that a fee cannot include costs attributable to existing deficiencies, but it may fund costs to maintain the existing Level of Service ("LOS") or to meet an adopted LOS consistent with the General Plan.

1. Identify the purpose of the fee [Government Code Section 66001(a)(1)];

2. Ascertain the use to which the fee will be put [Government Code Section 66001(a)(2)];

3. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and type of development on which the fee is to be imposed [Government Code Section 66001(a)(3)];

4. Establish how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and type of development project on which the fee is to be imposed [Government Code Section 66001(a)(4)]; and

5. Discuss how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
4 790

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed [Government Code Section 66001(b)].

Presented below are the legal requirements as they relate to the calculation and imposition of the proposed fees addressed by this Fee Study.

A PURPOSE OF THE FEE [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(1)] New development within the City will generate additional residents and employees. Given the relatively high cost of housing within the City, many of these new residents may struggle to afford market -rate housing and may still experience significant financial strain. These future residents and employees will create an additional demand for new or expanded Affordable Housing that the existing housing stock cannot accommodate. To accommodate residential development in an orderly manner, without adversely impacting the current quality of life in the City, additional Affordable Housing will need to be constructed.

It is the projected direct and cumulative effect of residential development that has required the preparation of this Fee Study. Every newly developed parcel will contribute to the need for new Affordable Housing, and, as such, the proposed fee will be charged to all future development, irrespective of location, within the City. Importantly, many of the employees associated with any additional residential development in the City may live in Affordable Housing. Additionally, the availability of jobs throughout the City has a growth -inducing impact by enhancing the City's reputation as a great place to live and work, thereby attracting new residential development that might overwise have been built elsewhere. As a result, all such development projects in the City contribute to the cumulative need for new Affordable Housing. The fee, when collected, will be placed into a dedicated fund that will be used solely for the design, acquisition, and construction of Affordable Housing and other appropriate related costs to mitigate the direct and cumulative impacts of new residential development within the City.

The discussion in this subsection of the Fee Study sets forth the purpose of the development impact fee as required by Section 66001(a)(1) of the California Government Code.

B THE USE TO WHICH THE FEE IS TO BE PUT [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(2)]
The fee collected will provide the City with revenue to facilitate the acquisition and construction of Affordable Housing and the related costs necessary to mitigate the direct and cumulative demand for such housing resulting from new residential development in the City. By directly funding these costs, the fee will both enhance the quality of life for and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the existing and future City residents and employees.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
5 791

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

C THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FEE'S USE AND THE TYPE

OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED (BENEFIT RELATIONSHIP) [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(3)]
As discussed in Section A above, the projected direct and cumulative effects of future development have prompted the preparation of this Fee Study. All new residential development within the City, irrespective of location, contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on affordable housing demand and creates the need for more such housing to accommodate growth. The derivation of fee amounts for residential development is explained in detail in Sections IV and V of this Fee Study. These fees will be expended exclusively for the design, acquisition, and construction of new Affordable Housing, as that is the purpose for which this development impact fee is being collected. As previously stated, all new residential development creates either a direct impact or contributes to the cumulative impact on Affordable housing.

For the foregoing reasons, there is a reasonable relationship between the design, acquisition, and construction of affordable housing and new development as required under Section 66001(a)(3) of the Mitigation Fee Act.

D DETERMINE HOW THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE NEED

Moreover, the affordable housing needs identified in Section V are a function solely of the number of projected residents in the City and do not reflect any unmet needs in existing development.

For the reasons presented herein and in Section V, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for affordable housing and all new development within the City.

E THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE AND

THE COST OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED ("ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY" RELATIONSHIP) [GOVERNMENT CODE 66001(B)]
As set forth above, all new residential development in the City impacts existing housing needs. Each individual residential development project and its related induced employment effects, along with the cumulative impacts of all development in the City, will increase the need for housing. Thus, the imposition of a fee to finance Affordable Housing is an efficient, practical, and equitable way to permit development to proceed responsibly.

New residential development directly and cumulatively impacts Affordable Housing needs.

The addition of new residents creates spending in existing and new businesses, creating City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
6 792

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
additional jobs, and a certain number of these new employees will require Affordable Housing. The proposed fee amounts are roughly proportional to the impacts of new development, based on the analyses in Section V. Thus, there is a reasonable relationship between the fee amount and the cost of subsidizing the necessary housing.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
7 793

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS

IV LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHIC ASSUMPTIONS
A Land Use Definitions and Employment Densities
As previously indicated, the purpose of the Fee Study is to determine the In -Lieu Fee for four (4) land use categories: Single Family Detached, Townhomes, Condominiums, and Apartments. As a first step, the existing sale prices and monthly rentals were estimated using recent listings on Zillow, and are summarized in the table below.

Table 1: Residential Development Parameters
Residential Land Use Average Unit Size
Average Sales Average Monthly
Price � Rent
Single Family Detached
Townhome
Condominium
Apartment
2,400
1,500
1,200
1,000
$1,467,500
$796,000
$609,900
NA
NA
NA
NA
$2,665
Next, using the valuations above, the average income required to own or rent residential property in each land -use category was estimated. Notably, the analysis assumes a 3 -to -1 gross income -to -housing expense ratio, meaning housing costs represent approximately 33% of gross income. Based on this assumption, housing expenses were calculated using a 20% down payment and a 30 -year fixed mortgage at a 5.00% interest rate. Additional costs— including insurance, HOA dues, property taxes, and other expenses—were estimated at

2.00% of the projected sales price for each residential land use. The resulting summary of household spending and income levels for each category is provided in the table below.

Table 2: Household Income Assumptions
Residential Land Use
Single Family
Detached
Townhome Condominium Apartment
Projected Sales Price
Average Mortgage
(20% Down -Payment)
Annual Mortgage
(5% Rate, 30 -Yr Term)
Annual Insurance, HOA,
Property Taxes, etc.
(2% of Sales Price)
Total Housing Payments
$1,467,500
$1,174,000
$796,000
$636,800
$609,900
$487,920
NA
NA
$75,627 $41,022 $31,431 $31,974 (1]
$29,350 $15,920 $12,198 $0
$104,977 $56,942 $43,629 $31,974
Average Household Income
(3 -to -1 Income to Housing $314,932 $170,825 $130,887 $95,922 Payment Ratio)
After estimating average household income for each residential land use, data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey ("CES"), conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, was used to calculate average non -housing spending within the City. The survey organizes City of Placentia
Affordable Housingln-Lieu Fee Justification Study
Aprill5, 2026
794

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
spending by income brackets and 15 major categories, such as Food at Home, Food Away from Home, Alcoholic Beverages, Apparel, and Transportation. For each of these spending categories, DTA estimated the percentage of that spending occurring in the City. For example, DTA estimated that 100% of Food at Home would occur in the City; whereas only 50% of Food Away from Home would occur within the same local area. Based on these assumptions, estimated local expenditures are summarized below. To maintain precision, per-unit annual expenditures were converted to totals of 100 units, as shown in the table.

Table 3: Estimated Annual Expenditure
Residential Land Use
Single Family
Detached
Townhome Condominium Apartment
Average Household Income
Expenditures (as a % of
Disposable Income)
Total Annual Expenditure
(Per Unit)
Total Annual Expenditure
(100 -Unit Development)
$314,932

23.61%
$170,825

33.24%
$130,887

37.78%
$95,922

45.52%
$74,368 $56,778 $49,446 $43,660
$7,436,838 $5,677,751 $4,944,593 $4,366,002
The additional expenditure by residents, shown above, is expected to generate jobs, particularly in sectors such as restaurants and retail, which are closely tied to household expenditures. To estimate these employment impacts by industry sector, the analysis used IMPLAN, a widely recognized economic modeling tool that uses input-output accounting to track how changes in final demand ripple through supply chains. The tool estimates effects across over 400 industry sectors in terms of output, employment, and income, based on regional datasets. More specifically, the IMPLAN model was used to allocate household spending across industry sectors using data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey in order to estimate the number of jobs created by increased demand for goods and services from new households (also referred to as "Induced Economic Impacts"). The table below summarizes the estimated job generation for each residential land use.

Table 4: Estimated Number of Jobs Generated
Residential Land Use Total Expenditure
(100 -Unit Project)
Total Jobs Created Total Jobs Created
per Household per 100 -Unit
Project
Single Family Detached
Townhome
Condominium
Apartment
B Worker Household
$7,436,838
$5,677,751
$4,944,593
$4,366,002

0.3666

0.2693

0.2428

0.2144

36.66 26.93

24.28 21.44
Since most households include more than one worker, the Fee Study groups employees generated by each land use into households to determine the total number of worker City of Placentia
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
795

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
households for each land use type. According to the US Census American Community Survey as of 2025, the City had 25,840 workers living in households and 17,182 households, averaging approximately 1.50 workers per household. Therefore, the Fee Study estimates the number of employee households generated by each land use by dividing the total number of workers by 1.50. The resulting estimated number of households per 100 units is shown below.

Table 5: Estimated Households per 100 Unit Project
Residential Land Use
Total Jobs
Generated per
100 -Unit Project
Total Households
Employees per (Jobs Generated /
Household 1.50 Employees
per Household)
Single Family Detached
Townhome
Condominium
Apartment
Total

36.66 26.93

24.28 21.44
109.31

1.50 1.50

1.50 1.50
NA

24.44 17.95

16.19 14.29

72.87 C Industry Sectors
The employees generated above will likely be engaged in a wide range of occupations.

Therefore, the goal of the Fee Study is to estimate the distribution of these new jobs created by residential spending, and determine the likely industry sectors associated with such jobs for each of the residential land uses.

These industry sectors are determined using the North American Industry Classification System ("NAICS"), which assigns numerical codes to each sector. NAICS codes group all industries into 22 major industry categories. The table below provides a percentage breakdown of occupations associated with each land use.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
10 796

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 6: Percentage Breakdown of Occupations by Land Use Industries by NAICS Co
Single Family Condominium Townho
Apartment
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000)
Legal Occupations (23-0000)
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000)
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000)
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000)
Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000)
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000)
Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000)
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) Production Occupations (51-0000)
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) Total
8% 8%
7% 8%
8%
8%
3% 3% 3%
1% 1% 1%
0% 0% 0% 0%
2% 2% 2% 2%
0% 0% 0% 0%
3% 3% 3% 3%
2% 2% 2% 2%
8% 6% 7% 6%
7% 6% 6% 6%
1% 1% 1% 1%
12% 13% 12% 13%
4% 4% 4% 4%
4% 4% 4% 4%
8% 9% 9% 9%
14% 14% 14% 14%
0% 0% 0% 0%
1% 1% 1% 1%
5% 5% 5% 5%
2% 2% 2% 2%
7% 8% 8% 8%
100% 100% 100% 100%
8%
8%
3%
1%
Based on the percentage allocations derived from Table 6, the anticipated number of households by occupation was determined as shown in the table below.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
11 797

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 7: Number of Households by Occupation and Land Use Industries by NAICS Cod
Single Family Detached Condominium Townhome Apartment
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000)
Legal Occupations (23-0000)
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations 0 0 0 0 (27-0000)
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 2 1 1 1 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 2 1 1 1
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0 0 0 0
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 3 2 2 2 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations 1 1 1 1 (37-0000)
Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 1 1 1 1 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 2 1 2 1
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 3 2 3 2 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0 0 0 0 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0 0 0 0 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 1 1 1 1 Production Occupations (51-0000) 1 0 0 0
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 2 1 1 1 Total 24 16 18 14
D Income Distribution of Worker Households
The occupational data by household, determined above, provides a framework for estimating household income. DTA utilized the Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Occupation Statistics, which provides earnings data by occupation and includes a distribution of earnings by occupation. Notably, given that the City would likely draw employees from an area larger than its boundaries, the analysis was based on data for the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim Metropolitan Statistical Area (the "MSA").

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
12 798

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
Wages by Occupation
(Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim MSA)

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 8: Wage Distribution by Occupation
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000)
Legal Occupations (23-0000)
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media
Occupations (27-0000)
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29- 0000)
Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000)
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000)
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-
0000)
Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance
Occupations (37-0000)
Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000)
Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000)
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000)
Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000)
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-
0000)
Production Occupations (51-0000)
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-
0000)
10th I 25th
percentil percentile
wage wage
$64,210
$50,040
$60,310
$63,820
$48,510
$42,240
$56,520
$37,240
$40,710
$87,720
$66,230
$80,830
$81,320
$64,350
$47,880
$77,630
$46,230
$54,000
Median percentile percen
Wage wage wag
75th 90th
$131,930
$89,470
$121,480
$105,540
$96,480
$62,700
$128,680
$65,520
$82,490
$196,390
$124,740
$160,230
$140,880
$127,540
$92,880
$210,550
$102,490
$122,090
$262,480
$164,730
$192,960
$178,290
$152,480
$118,700
$323,010
$130,030
$168,860
99th
rcentile
wage
$345,939
$203,538
$262,139
$221,299
$208,878
$150,783
$425,093
$177,839
$225,827
$48,550 $71,720 $105,750 $151,810 $179,990 $258,688
$34,600 $34,600 $34,860 $41,710 $50,050 $52,430
$36,880 $38,450 $47,340 $87,160 $125,430 $152,890
$34,390 $35,470 $36,960 $44,700 $52,610 $58,055
$34,820 $36,010 $39,030 $47,860 $59,860 $64,463
$34,100 $35,140 $37,040 $46,210 $63,060 $64,018
$34,830 $36,090 $43,950 $63,790 $102,570 $106,993
$37,260 $43,410 $50,930 $63,580 $79,140 $91,659
$35,210 $37,500 $43,680 $53,610 $76,490 $76,738
$45,100 $51,950 $69,600 $96,980 $122,980 $154,605
$39,590 $47,870 $63,270 $82,460 $107,690 $129,793
$35,780 $37,750 $45,710 $58,680 $77,070 $87,549
$35,360 $36,920 $43,720 $55,540 $74,050 $85,006
Notably, DTA also incorporated the household income limits for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households. Based on the 2025 HUD guidelines for multifamily tax subsidy projects, assuming a 3 -person household, the Area Median Income ("AMI") for Orange County is equal to $152,300 per household. From this data, other income levels, specifically, extremely low (30%), very low (50%), low (80%), and moderate (120%), were determined, as shown in Table 9 below.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
13 799

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 9: Income Categories - Orange County
Income Category
Household Income
(3 -Person Household)
Median Income
Extremely Low (30%)
Very Low (50%)
Low (80%)
Moderate (120%)
$152,300
$45,690
$76,150
$121,840
$182,760
Data from Table 8 and Table 9 was then used to generate the percentage of households within each income category, as shown in the table below.

Table 10: Income Categories across Occupation
Income Categories by Occupation
(Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim MSA)
30% AMI 50% AMI 80% AMI 100% AMI 120% AMI
Above
120% AM
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)

0.53% 0.78% 1.99% 1.01% 0.88% 2.26% 7.45%

0.57% 1.65% 2.31% 0.77% 0.55% 0.36% 6.21%

0.25% 0.47% 0.95% 0.65% 0.51% 0.49% 3.33%

0.08% 0.15% 0.46% 0.21% 0.13% 0.10% 1.14%
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.09% 0.24% 0.35% 0.19% 0.05% 0.05% 0.98% Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.46% 1.02% 0.72% 0.22% 0.00% 0.00% 2.42% Legal Occupations (23-0000)
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-
0000)
Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media
Occupations (27-0000)
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-

0.53% 1.05% 1.70% 0.92% 0.84% 0.54%
0000)
Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 2.90% 0.63% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

0.06% 0.11% 0.16% 0.08% 0.07% 0.24% 0.72%

4.38% 6.01% 5.15% 1.57% 1.05% 0.00% 18.16%

0.30% 0.56% 0.59% 0.19% 0.14% 0.15% 1.93%
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000)
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-
0000)
Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance
Occupations (37-0000)
Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000)

0.54% 0.27% 0.25% 0.12% 0.01% 0.00%

7.82% 2.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

5.59%

3.53%

1.20%

10.17%

2.22% 1.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 3.22%

2.06% 0.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.80%
Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 2.14% 1.13% 0.83% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 3.79% 6.35% 1.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.03% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.67% 2.64% 1.97% 0.53% 0.10% 0.00% Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-

0.87% 1.90% 1.20% 0.18% 0.00% 0.00%
0000)
Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.74% 0.58% 0.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-

2.07% 1.44% 0.32% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0000)
Total 33.10% 31.09% 20.62% 6.65% 4.34% 4.19% 100.00X

4.10%

11.64%

0.06%
S.90%

4.15%

1.48%

3.83%
City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
14 800

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
The data in the table above provides an allocation of employees across occupations and income levels. However, in order to generate estimated employee counts by occupation, the data was realigned to each occupation as shown in Table 11, to determine the percentage of workers in each occupation that fall within each income level.

Table 11: Distribution of Occupation for Worker by Income Categories Income Categories by Occupation
30% 50% 80%
1I _ 1I _ 1I
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000)
Legal Occupations (23-0000)
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000)

7.12% 10.50% 26.68% 13.61% 11.81% 30.29% 100%

9.13% 26.54% 37.27% 12.39% 8.84% 5.82% 100%

7.58% 14.00% 28.65% 19.65% 15.44% 14.67% 100%

7.16% 13.41% 40.57% 18.44% 11.36% 9.06% 100%

9.42% 24.76% 36.23% 19.48% 4.94% 5.17% 100%

18.98% 42.16% 29.74% 9.12% 0.00% 0.00% 100%

8.08% 15.86% 22.70% 10.56% 9.30% 33.49% 100%

24.10% 33.09% 28.35% 8.65% 5.81% 0.00% 100%
Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 15.62% 28.82% 30.41% 9.85% 7.51% 7.80% 100% Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 9.41% 18.84% 30.48% 16.53% 15.06% 9.68% 100% Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 82.16% 17.84% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100% Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 45.36% 22.73% 20.51% 10.21% 1.19% 0.00% 100% Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 76.88% 23.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100% Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-

68.86% 31.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100%
0000)
Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 73.58% 26.42% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100% Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 52.19% 27.59% 20.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100% Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 32.58% 54.54% 12.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 55.06% 34.72% 10.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100% Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 11.29% 44.69% 33.36% 9.00% 1.66% 0.00% 100% Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 21.05% 45.73% 28.98% 4.24% 0.00% 0.00% 100% Production Occupations (51-0000) 49.94% 39.31% 10.75% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100% Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 54.17% 37.56% 8.27% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100% City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
15 801

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
E Worker Households by Income Level
The table below provides a summary of worker households by income for each land use.

This data was derived from the distribution of occupations by land use from Table 6, and the distribution of occupations for workers by income category from Table 11.

Table 12: Distribution of Worker Households by Land Use (100 -Unit Project) Land Use
(100 -Unit Project)
30% AMI 50% AMI 80% AMI 100% AMI 120%
Above
120% AMI
Total
[Single Family Detached
Townhome
Condominium
Apartment
Total

9.68 7.10

6.43 5.67

28.88 7.30

5.41 4.89

4.32 21.92

4.16 3.06

2.75 2.43

12.41 1.29

0.92 0.82

0.72 3.75

0.93 0.65

0.58 0.51

2.67 1.08

0.80 0.72

0.63 3.23
City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study

24.44 17.95

16.19 14.29

72.87 16 802

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

AFFORDABILITY GAP AND IN -LIEU

FEE CALCULATION

V AFFORDABILITY GAP AND IN -LIEU FEE CALCULATION
A Affordability Gap
This section of the Fee Study calculates the cost of housing the extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households by determining the per unit "financing gap" a developer would encounter when constructing a for -rent project. In other words, the cost to house a lower-income household is the difference between the value of a for -rent affordable unit and the cost to develop that unit.

Firstly, the current market -rate rent in the City for a new two-bedroom apartment is approximately $2,665 per month. According to the 2025 HUD guidelines for multifamily tax subsidy projects, households at different AMI levels can afford the monthly rents as shown in the table below.

Table 13: Monthly Rental Estimates
Building Type
Monthly Rent
per Unit 1
Market Rate Unit
Below 30% AMI — Affordable Unit
30-50% AMI — Affordable Unit
50-80% AMI — Affordable Unit
80-100% AMI — Affordable Unit
$2,665
$1,142
$1,903
$3,046
$3,806
Notes:

1. Market -rate rents were sourced from Zillow listings for the City as of January 2026. Affordable rents were obtained from U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Multifamily Tax Subsidy Rents for Orange County.

Using the rental incomes above, the estimated valuation for units in each income tier was determined based on the Net Operating Income ("NOI") (i.e., rental income less operating expenses and vacancy) and a cap rate for for -rent developments. Notably, assumed vacancy rates and the cap rates were based on current market snapshots from CoStar Property. DTA also assumed Low -Income Housing Tax Credits ("LIHTCs"), in the form of 4% Tax Credit Financing, would be available as a partial subsidy for developing rental units for households with incomes below 30% AMI only. Finally, the actual construction cost for these rental units was estimated using data from recent LIHTC applications for projects in the City.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
17 803

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

AFFORDABILITY GAP AND IN -LIEU

FEE CALCULATION
Table 14: Estimated Per Unit Affordability Gap
Development Category
For Rent
Product
Affordable
30 AMI
For Rent
Product
Affordable
50 AMI
For Rent
Product
Affordable
80 AMI
For Rent
Product
Affordable
100 AMI
Unit Size
Rental Limits
Gross Annual Rent 1
Less: Vacancies 2
Less: Operating Expenses
Projected Net Revenue
Cap Rate 2
Estimated Valuation
Direct Construction Costs
Tax Credits (limited to 30 AMI category only)
Eligible Basis (75%)
Tax Credit Financing
Net Construction Cost
1,000
$1,142
$13,704
($480)
($5,500)
$7,724

4.40%
$175,554
($550,000)
4%
$412,500
$165,000
1,000
$1,903
$22,836
($799)
($5,500)
$16,537

4.40%
1,000
$3,046
$36,552
($1,279)
($5,500)
$29,773

4.40%
1,000
$3,806
$45,672
($1,599)
($5,500)
$38,573

4.40%
$375,835 $676,652 $876,670
($550,000) ($550,000) ($550,000)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
($385,000) ($550,000) ($550,000) ($550,000)
Affordability Gap $209,446 $174,165 $0 $0
Notes:

1. Market rates based on listings of apartment rentals in the City. Rentals for 80% AMI, 50% AMI, and 30% AMI, are based on the State HUD limits effective April 1, 2025, for a 2 -bedroom unit.

2. Source: CoStar Property - Multi -Family Summary, City of Placentia.

B Fee Calculation
To determine the maximum justifiable In -Lieu Fee, the estimated worker households generated by each residential land use category at each income level (divided by 100), as shown in Table 12, are multiplied by the corresponding per unit affordability gaps shown in Table 14. The resulting amounts represent the maximum fee supported by the nexus analysis for each income category, and their sum represents the total maximum justifiable fee for each residential land use category, as shown in Table 15.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
18 804

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
Single Family Detached
Townhome
Condominium
Apartment
Total
Affordability Gap

SECTION V

AFFORDABILITY GAP AND IN -LIEU

FEE CALCULATION
Table 15: Maximum Justifiable Fees
30% AMI 50% AMI 80% AMI 100%

9.68 7.10

6.43 5.67

28.88 7.30

5.41 4.89

4.32 21.92

4.16 3.06

2.75 2.43

12.41 1.29

0.92 0.82

0.72 3.75

0.93 0.65

0.58 0.51

2.67 1.08

0.80 0.72

0.63 3.23

24.44 17.95

16.19 14.29

72.87 $209,446.36 $174,165.00 NA NA NA NA NA
Single Family Detached $20,278.06 $12,705.79 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,984 Townhome $14,878.75 $9,427.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $24,306 Condominium $13,457.67 $8,524.93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21,983 Apartment $11,882.90 $7,527.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,410 The totals represent the ceiling for impact fees applicable to new residential development to mitigate its effect on affordable housing demand. These figures are not recommendations; they indicate only the maximums determined by this analysis.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housingln-Lieu Fee Justification Study
19 805

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

VI FEE IMPLEMENTATION

SECTION VI

FEE IMPLEMENTATION
A Administering a Fee Program
Implementing a fee program requires significant planning and training, so it should be done efficiently and with regular frequency. A well-designed program can generate sufficient funds to offset development impacts, while a poorly structured one risks underfunding, reliance on the General Fund, or overcharging, which could lead to legal challenges or refund obligations.

All staff involved -across accounting, budgeting, and project management- must understand the distinction between in -lieu fees and other types of fees, as well as the rules governing how fee revenues may be used. The fees proposed in this report are tied to a specific purpose and must be spent accordingly.

B Indexing the In -Lieu Fee
The fees presented in this Fee Study are based on current construction costs and should be adjusted annually to account for inflation, as construction costs ultimately impact the cost of providing or subsidizing affordable housing. Therefore, DTA recommends that, after adoption, the fee be reviewed each year and adjusted based on a reliable index, such as ENR's Construction Cost Index, which is generally used as the primary basis for indexing construction costs.

C Phase -In Schedule for Fee
A key component of adopting this Fee is the effective date on which it becomes active. One approach adopted by cities is to set a future effective date and/or waive fees for current projects that are in the development pipeline. Other approaches include a phased -in period of 1-2 years, during which the fee is set at 50% for the first year of applicability, rising to the full 100% after 12 months.

D Waivers, Exemptions, and Refunds Overview
The California Government Code permits impact fee exemptions for certain land uses at the discretion of local jurisdictions. Such fee exemptions are a policy matter that should be based on consideration of the greater public good provided by exempting this specific use from the impact fee. The following are some considerations related to waivers, exemptions, or refunds.
■ Affordable Housing : Most cities waive fees for projects that are 100% affordable housing.
■ Alternatives to Fees : Many cities allow developers to provide housing units or donate land instead of paying fees.
■ Public Projects : Fees are typically waived for publicly owned developments.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
20 806

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION VI

FEE IMPLEMENTATION
■ Special Land Uses: Some cities offer waivers for non-profit buildings, religious institutions, educational facilities (both public and private), and similar land uses. • Small Buildings : Certain cities exempt smaller buildings from fees, for example, accessory dwelling units or commercial buildings under 25,000 square feet. • Policy -Driven Reductions : To support broader policy goals, many cities reduce or exempt fees for specific types of development.

City of Placentia
Affordable I-fousing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study
April 15; 2026
21 807

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

APPENDIX A
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study

FEE CALCULATION
808

City of Placentia
Residential Fee Tables
Prototype Residential Units
Average Unit Average # of Average Sales Average
Unit Type Size Bedrooms Price Monthly Rent
Single Family Detached 2,400 4 $1,467,500
Townhome 1,500 3 $796,000
Condominium 1,200 2 $609,900
Apartment 1,000 1.5 $2,665
ill Source: Zillow. Summary statistics for City of Placentia.

Household Income b Expenditure
Total Annual
Expenditures
Household per
Annual % Income on Total Annual 100 -Unit
Unit Type Income ill Expenditures [21 Expenditures Project Single Family Detached $314,932 23.61% $74,368 $7,436,838 Townhome $170,825 33.24% $56,778 $5,677,751
Condominium $130,887 37.78% $49,446 $4,944,593
Apartment $95,922 45.52% $43,660 $4,366,002
11] Assumes a 20% down payment, 5% interest, and a 30 year term, plus taxes and insurance, using a 3.1 income to housing cost ratio. 12] Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2023 Consumer Expenditure Survey Hypothetical Job Generation (100 -Unit Project)
Total Jobs
Total Jobs Created per
Total Annual Created per 100 -Unit
Unit Type Expenditures Unit 111 Project
Single Family Detached $7,436,838 0.3666 36.66
Townhome $5,677,751 0.2693 26.93
Condominium $4,944,593 0.2428 24.28
Apartment $4,366,002 0.2144 21.44
111 Source' IMPLAN (IMpact analysis for PLANning), Household Spending for Direct and Induced Impact.

Residential Unit Demand Impacts (100 -Unit Project)
Total Jobs
Created per Estimated
100 -Unit Employees per Employee
Unit Type Project Household [1) Households
Single Family Detached 36.66 1.50 24.44
Townhome 26.93 1.50 17.95
Condominium 24.28 1.50 16.19
Apartment 21.44 1.50 14.29
I1] Source U.S. Census Bureau, Tables S0802 and 82502. 72.87 Distribution of Employees by Income Categories (100 -Unit Project) ti) 30% Area 100% Area 120% Area Above 120%
Median 50% Area Median 80% Area Median Median Area Median Unit Type Income Income Median Income Income Income Income Total Single Family Detached 9.68 7.30 4.16 1.29 0.93 1.08 24.44 Townhome 7.10 5.41 3.06 0.92 0.65 0.80 17.95
Condominium 6.43 4.89 2.75 0.82 0.58 0.72 16.19
Apartment 5.67 4.32 2.43 0.72 0.51 0.63 14.29

28.88 21.92 12.41 3.75 2.67 3.23 72.87
11] Sources U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, Employment Profiles by NAICS Worth American Industry Classification System) Code 809

Affordability Gap Analysis t1[
Unit Type
Affordability Gap - Rental (Apartment)
City of Placentia
Residential Fee Tables
80% Area 100% Area
30% Area Median 50% Area Median Median
Income Median Income Income Income
$209,446.36 $174,165.00 NA NA
111 See Page 3, Affordable Housing Gap Analysis, for the detailed methodology, assumptions, and affordability gap calculations.

Maximum Justifiable Fee nl
Maximum
30% Area Median S0% Area Justifiable
Unit Type Basis Income Median Income Fee
Single Family Detached Per Unit $20,278.06 $12,705.79 $32,984 Townhome Per Unit $14,878.75 $9,427.01 $24,306
Condominium Per Unit $13,457.67 $8,524.93 $21,983
Apartment Per Unit $11,882.90 $7,527.38 $19,410
111 Fee amounts are calculated by applying the applicable affordability gap to the distribution of employees by income category and summing the resulting amounts. The 80% and 100% area median income categories are not included because the affordability gap analysis identified no affordability gap at those income levels. 810

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

APPENDIX B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study

OCCUPATIONAL

STATISTICS
811

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics (Residential)
Occupation Distribution by Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) Single Family Detached Condominium Townhome Apartment Management Occupations (11-0000) 8% 8% 8% 8%
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 7% 8% 8% 8% Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 3% 3% 3% 3% Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 1% 1% 1% 1% Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0% 0% 0% 0% Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 2% 2% 2% 2% Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 3% 3% 3% 3% Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 2% 2% 2% 2% Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 8% 6% 7% 6% Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 7% 6% 6% 6%
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 1% 1% 1% 1%
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 12% 13% 12% 13% Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 4% 4% 4% 4% Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 4% 4% 4% 4% Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 8% 9% 9% 9%
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 14% 14% 14% 14% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0% 0% 0% 0% Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 1% 1% 1% 1% Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 5% 5% 5% 5% Production Occupations (51-0000) 2% 2% 2% 2%
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 7% 8% 8% 8% Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Households by Occupation & land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) Single Family Detached Condominium Townhome Apartment Management Occupations (11-0000) 2 1 1 1
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 2 1 1 1 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 1 1 1 0 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0 0 0 0 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0 0 0 0 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 1 0 0 0 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0 0 0 0
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 1 0 0 0 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0 0 0 0 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 2 1 1 1 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 2 1 1 1
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0 0 0 0
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 3 2 2 2 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 1 1 1 1 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 1 1 1 1 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 2 1 2 1
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 3 2 3 2 Fanning, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0 0 0 0 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0 0 0 0 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 1 1 1 1 Production Occupations (51-0000) 1 0 0 0
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 2 1 1 1 Total 24 16 18 14
Appendix B - Page 1
812

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics (Residential)
Distribution of Occupations for Households by Income Level 30% Area 50% Area 80% Area 100% Area 120% Area Above 120% Median Median Median Median Median Area Median
Occupations (SOC Codes) Income Income Income Income Income Income Management Occupations (11-0000) 7 12% 10.50% 26.68% 13.61% 1181% 30.29% Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 9.13% 26.54% 37.27% 12.39% 8.84% 5.82% Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 7.58% 14.00% 28.65% 19.65% 15.44% 14.67% Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 7.16% 13.41% 40.57% 18.44% 11.36% 9.06% Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 9.42% 24.76% 36.23% 19.48% 4.94% 5.17% Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 18.98% 42.16% 29.74% 9.12% 0.00% 0.00% Legal Occupations (23-0000) 8.08% 15.86% 22.70% 10.56% 9.30% 33.49% Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 24.10% 33.09% 28.35% 8.65% 5.81% 0.00% Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 15.62% 28.82% 30.41% 9.85% 7.51% 7.80% Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 9.41% 18.84% 30.48% 16.53% 15.06% 9.68% Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 82.16% 17.84% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 45.36% 22.73% 20.51% 10.21% 1.19% 0.00% Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 76.88% 23.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 68.86% 31.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 73.58% 26.42% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 52.19% 27.59% 20.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 32.58% 54.54% 12.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 55.06% 34.72% 10.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 11.29% 44.69% 33.36% 9.00% 1.66% 0.00% Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 21.05% 45.73% 28.98% 4.24% 0.00% 0.00% Production Occupations (51-0000) 49.94% 39.31% 10.75% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 54.17% 37.56% 8.27% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total NA NA NA NA NA NA
30% AMI Households by Occupation b Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) Single Family Detached Condominium Townhome Apartment Management Occupations (11-0000) 0.137 0.095 0.105 0.084 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 0.160 0.113 0.125 0.100 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 0.057 0.041 0.045 0.036 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.012 0.008 0.009 0.007 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.011 0.007 0.008 0.006 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.114 0.067 0.077 0.059 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.008 0.006 0.007 0.005
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.187 0.099 0.118 0.087 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.063 0.046 0.047 0.041 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.195 0.096 0.116 0.085 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 1.503 0.740 0.893 0.653 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.106 0.071 0.076 0.063 Food Preparation and Searing Related Occupations (35-0000) 2.227 1569 1.722 1.385 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.601 0.411 0.445 0.363 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.670 0.479 0.490 0.423 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 1.059 0.776 0.842 0.686 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 1.097 0.736 0.819 0.650 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.023 0.017 0.018 0.015 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.029 0.020 0.022 0.018 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.232 0.171 0.183 0.151 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.262 0.187 0.206 0.165 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.930 0.669 0.732 0.591 Total 9.682 6.425 7.104 5.673
Appendix B - Page 2
813

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics (Residential)
50% AMI Households by Occupation b Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) Single Family Detached Condominium Townhome Apartment Management Occupations (11-0000) 0.203 0.141 0.154 0.124 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 0.465 0.330 0.365 0.291 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 0.106 0.076 0.083 0.067 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.022 0.016 0.017 0.014 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.028 0.017 0.020 0.015 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.252 0.148 0.171 0.131 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.016 0.011 0.013 0.010
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.257 0.136 0.161 0.120 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.115 0.086 0.087 0.076 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.391 0.192 0.232 0.170 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.326 0.161 0.194 0.142 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.053 0.036 0.038 0.031 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 0.670 0.472 0.518 0.417 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.272 0.186 0.201 0.164 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.241 0.172 0.176 0.152 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 0.560 0.410 0.445 0.362 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 1.836 1.233 1.371 1.088 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.014 0.010 0.011 0.009 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.113 0.081 0.088 0.071 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.505 0.370 0.397 0.327 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.207 0.147 0.162 0.130 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.645 0.464 0.507 0.410 Total 7295 4.895 5.413 4.322
80% AMI Households by Occupation b Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) Single Family Detached Condominium Townhome Apartment Management Occupations (11-0000) 0.515 0.358 0.392 0.316 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 0.653 0.463 0.512 0.409 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 0.217 0.155 0.170 0.137 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.066 0.047 0.052 0.042 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.041 0.025 0.029 0.022 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.178 0.104 0.120 0.092 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.023 0.016 0.018 0.014
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.220 0.116 0.138 0.103 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.122 0.090 0.092 0.080 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.633 0.311 0.376 0.275 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.048 0.032 0.034 0.028 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 0.410 0.301 0.326 0.266 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 0.434 0.291 0.324 0.257 Fanning, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.084 0.060 0.066 0.053 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.320 0.235 0.252 0.207 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.056 0.040 0.044 0.036 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.142 0.102 0.112 0.090 Total 4.165 2.752 3.062 2.430
Appendix B - Page 3
814

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics (Residential)
100% AMI Households by Occupation b Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) Single Family Detached Condominium Townhome Apartment Management Occupations (11-0000) 0.263 0.183 0.200 0.161 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 0.217 0.154 0.170 0.136 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 0.149 0.107 0.116 0.094 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.030 0.021 0.024 0.019 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.022 0.014 0.016 0.012 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.055 0.032 0.037 0.028 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.011 0.008 0.008 0.007
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.067 0.035 0.042 0.031 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.039 0.029 0.030 0.026 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.343 0.169 0.204 0.149 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.024 0.016 0.017 0.014 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.023 0.016 0.018 0.014 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.047 0.034 0.037 0.030 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 1288 0.818 0.919 0.722
120% AMI Households by Occupation b Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) Single Family Detached Condominium Townhome Apartment Management Occupations (11-0000) 0.228 0.158 0.174 0.140 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 0.155 0.110 0.122 0.097 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 0.117 0.084 0.091 0.074 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.018 0.013 0.015 0.012 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.006 0.003 0.004 0.003 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.009 0.007 0.007 0.006
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.045 0.024 0.028 0.021 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.030 0.022 0.023 0.020 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.312 0.154 0.186 0.136 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Fanning, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 0.928 0.580 0.655 0.512
Appendix B - Page 4
815

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics (Residential)
Above 120% AMI Households by Occupation b Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) Single Family Detached Condominium Townhome Apartment Management Occupations (11-0000) 0.585 0.406 0.446 0.359 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 0.102 0.072 0.080 0.064 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 0.111 0.080 0.087 0.070 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.015 0.011 0.012 0.009 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.006 0.004 0.004 0.003 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.033 0.024 0.027 0.021
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.031 0.023 0.024 0.020 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.201 0.099 0.119 0.087 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 1.084 0.718 0.798 0.634
Appendix B - Page 5
816

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

APPENDIX C
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Justification Study

AFFORDABILITY GAP

ANALYSIS
817

Affordable Housing Gap Analysis
For Rent Product For Rent Product For Rent Product For Rent Product Affordable 30 Affordable 50 Affordable 80 Affordable 100 Development Category or Development Description Assumptions AMI AMI AMI AMI Units
Unit Size
Rentable Sq. Ft.

Rental Assumptions
Monthly Rental (Per Unit) [1i
Monthly Rental (Per Sq. Ft.)
1 /aJ 1 1 1 1
1,000 /b1 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
/cJ= [al xlb] 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
ldI
le] = /dJ//bJ
$1,142
$1,903
$3,046
$3,806
$1.14 $1.90 $3.05 $3.81
Revenue Assumptions
Gross Annual Revenue /fJ= lc] xle] $13,704 $22,836 $36,552 $45,672 Less: Vacancies [2] 3.50% ($480) ($799) ($1,279) ($1,599) Less: Operating Costs t31 $5,500.00 per Unit per Year ($5,500) ($5,500) ($5,500) ($5,500) Net Annual Revenue /g> $7,724 $16,537 $29,773 $38,573
Valuation Assumptions
Assumed Cap Rate [21
Estimated Valuation
Estimated Development Cost
Tax Credit Financing
Eligible Basis
Tax Credit
Estimated Tax Credit Financing
Affordability Gap

4.40% /hJ 4.40% 4.40% 4.40% 4.40%
/i1= /q1//171 $175,554 $375,835 $676,652 $876,670
07 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 $550,000
75% /kJ=/j1x75% $412,500 $412,500 $412,500 $0
/1J 4% 0% 0%
/m1=/1(1x/!1 x10 $165,000 $0 $0 $0
/nJ=/iJ-/>"J-/mJ $209,446 $174,165 $0 $0
1i1 Market rates based on listings of apartment rentals in the City. Rentals for 80% AMI, 50% AMI, and 30% AMI, are based on the State HUD limits effective April 1, 2025, for a 2 bedroom unit. (2' Source: CoStar Property - Multi -Family Summary, City of Placentia. 131 Operating costs estimated by DTA based on comparable projects. 818

r4
www.FinanceDTA.com
18201 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 220
IRVINE, CA 92612
PHONE: (800) 969-4DTA
Public Finance
Public -Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds

4 www.FinanceDTA.com

AFFORDABLE HOUSING

LINKAGE FEE

NON-RESIDENTIAL

JUSTIFICATION STUDY

CITY OF PLACENTIA
Report Date: April 15, 2026
Public Finance
Public -Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds
111
Irvine / San Jose / San Francisco / Riverside
Dallas / Houston / Raleigh / Tampa
820

dta
/ 18201 Von }Carman Avenue, Suite 220
www.FinanceDTA.com Irvine, CA 92612

CITY OF PLACENTIA

AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE

NON-RESIDENTIAL

JUSTIFICATION STUDY
821

TABLE

OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE
I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A Linkage Fee Summary 1
B Annual Escalation Factors 2
II INTRODUCTION 3
A Overview of Methodology 3

III LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES 5

IV LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHIC ASSUMPTIONS
9 A Land Use Definitions and Employment
Densities 9
B Worker Household 10
C Industry Sectors 10
D Income Distribution of Worker Households 12
E Worker Households by Income Level 16
✓ AFFORDABILITY GAP AND LINKAGE FEE
CALCULATION 17
A Affordability Gap 17
B Fee Calculation 18
VI FEE IMPLEMENTATION 20
A Administering a Fee Program 20
B Indexing the Linkage Fee 20
C Phase -In Schedule for Fee 20
D Waivers, Exemptions, and Refunds
Overview 20
822

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In order to adequately plan for new development and quantify the need for Affordable Housing and related costs associated with the direct and cumulative impacts of new development, DTA was retained by the City of Placentia (the "City") to prepare this non-residential nexus analysis (the "Fee Study") and accompanying report for the City to establish a basis for a proposed non- residential linkage fee (the "Linkage Fee"). The proposed fee would be levied on new non- residential development within the City to mitigate the impact of such development on demand for affordable housing for the local workforce. The purpose of the Fee Study is to provide a legally defensible analysis of the "nexus" between new non-residential development projects, the additional employment generated, the resulting new worker households and their income distributions, and ultimately an estimate of those households that will need affordable housing. Importantly, the analysis examines the cost of delivering housing for households earning up to 120% of the Area Median Income ("AMI") and evaluates the maximum feasible fee per square foot of new non-residential development, which is required to support the provision of such housing.

A Linkage Fee Summary
The Fee Study establishes a connection among new non-residential land uses, increased spending that introduces new workers, and the housing demand generated by those new workers. Given that some of these workers may belong to lower-income households, a portion of the resulting housing demand must be met by affordable housing options. The analysis begins by categorizing non-residential land uses into four distinct types:
commercial/retail, office, industrial and hotel/motel. The precise definitions of these categories shall be determined by City staff on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with the City's Zoning Ordinance. The subsequent analysis proceeds with the following calculations:
■ Employee generation numbers per 1,000 square feet for each non-residential category were determined.
■ Occupational and income information for each occupation was used to determine the distribution of jobs within each such occupation, with particular focus on the jobs with compensation levels addressed in the analysis. ■ New jobs are adjusted to new households, using area -specific demographic information on the number of workers per household.
■ The number of Extremely Low, Very Low-, Low-, and Moderate -Income households generated by the new development is calculated and coefficients of households per square foot of building area are generated.
■ The number of lower-income households per square foot is multiplied by the "Affordability Gap", or the cost of delivering housing units affordable to these income groups, to generate the maximum Linkage Fee for the non-residential land uses.

The resulting fees are summarized in Table ES -1 below. This table presents the maximum City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
1 823

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
legally justifiable fees as determined by the Fee Study. These totals reflect the maximum impact fees that may be assessed on new non-residential construction to address its contribution to affordable housing needs. They are not proposed fee levels; they represent only the upper limits identified through this analysis.

Table ES -1: Linkage Fee Summary
Land Use Type
Maximum Justifiable
Fee (Per Sq. Ft.)
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
B Annual Escalation Factors
$289.28
$227.27
$111.11
$48.87
The cost estimates for the Linkage Fee calculated in this Fee Study are stated in 2026 dollars.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
2 824

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

II INTRODUCTION

SECTION II

INTRODUCTION
A Overview of Methodology
This Fee Study is based on the premise that new non-residential land uses generate new employment for workers that will have a range of household incomes. Given the high cost of housing, many of these new workers will be unable to afford market -rate housing without experiencing significant financial strain. Consequently, the increase in lower-income worker households without access to affordable housing is considered a direct impact of new non-residential development. To address this, the proposed mitigation fee (the "Linkage Fee") is intended to generate revenue that supports the development of housing affordable to these new lower-income households.

This section provides an overview of Fee Study. Each step is summarized below and discussed in more detail in the following sections:
• Section I: Executive Summary
• Section II: Introduction
• Section III: Legal Framework
This section provides a detailed discussion on the legal framework utilized to justify the imposition and collection of the fee.
• Section IV: Land Use and Demographic Assumptions
The Fee Study analyzes four key non-residential land use categories that represent the majority of anticipated future employment -generating uses in the City. For each defined land use type, the Fee Study calculates average employment density to estimate the number of workers per 100,000 square feet. Recognizing that most households include more than one worker, the study converts these employment figures into worker households to determine the total number generated by each land use. It then identifies the occupations likely to occupy each of the four non- residential land uses and, based on these occupations, constructs the expected household income distribution for each type. Finally, the Fee Study estimates the income -level distribution of new worker households by applying the income profiles to the total household counts.
• Section V: Financing Gap per Affordable Unit & Maximum Legal Fee Calculation This Section evaluates the economic viability of constructing a market -rate dwelling unit versus a dwelling unit with rents affordable to a Moderate -Income or Low - Income Household, to determine the affordability gap. This gap is then applied to the estimated worker households by income level generated by each land use category to calculate the maximum legal fee.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
3 825

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION II

INTRODUCTION
■ Section VI: Fee Implementation
This section presents policy recommendations for implementation, administration, and other considerations.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
4 826

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

III LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
The imposition of impact fees is one authorized method of financing the facilities necessary to mitigate the impacts of new development, including affordable housing. A fee is "a monetary exaction, other than a tax or special assessment, which is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project..." (California Government Code, Section 66000).

1. Identify the purpose of the fee [Government Code Section 66001(a)(1)];

2. Ascertain the use to which the fee will be put [Government Code Section 66001(a)(2)];

3. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and type of development on which the fee is to be imposed [Government Code Section 66001(a)(3)];

5. Discuss how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
5 827

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed [Government Code Section 66001(b)].

Presented below are the legal requirements as they relate to the calculation and imposition of the proposed fees addressed by this Fee Study.

A PURPOSE OF THE FEE [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(1)] New development within the City will generate additional employees and worker households. Given the relatively high cost of housing within the City, many of these new workers may struggle to afford market -rate housing and may still experience significant financial strain. These future residents and employees will create an additional demand for new or expanded Affordable Housing that the existing housing stock cannot accommodate.

To accommodate non-residential development in an orderly manner, without adversely impacting the current quality of life in the City, additional Affordable Housing will need to be constructed.

It is the projected direct and cumulative effect of non-residential development that has required the preparation of this Fee Study. Every newly developed parcel will contribute to the need for new Affordable Housing, and, as such, the proposed fee will be charged to all future development, irrespective of location, within the City. Importantly, many of the employees associated with any non-residential development in the City may live in Affordable Housing. Additionally, the availability of jobs throughout the City has a growth - inducing impact, by enhancing the City's reputation as a great place to live and work, thereby attracting new development that might otherwise have been built elsewhere. As a result, all such development projects in the City contribute to the cumulative need for new Affordable Housing. The fee, when collected, will be placed into a dedicated fund that will be used solely for the design, acquisition, and construction of Affordable Housing and other appropriate related costs to mitigate the direct and cumulative impacts of new non- residential development within the City.

The discussion in this subsection of the Fee Study sets forth the purpose of the development impact fee as required by Section 66001(a)(1) of the California Government Code.

B THE USE TO WHICH THE FEE IS TO BE PUT [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(2)]
The fee collected will provide the City with revenue to facilitate the acquisition and construction of Affordable Housing and the related costs necessary to mitigate the direct and cumulative demand for such housing resulting from new non-residential development in the City. By directly funding these costs, the fee will both enhance the quality of life for and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the existing and future City residents and employees.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
6 828

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

C THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FEE'S USE AND THE TYPE

OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED (BENEFIT RELATIONSHIP) [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(3)]
As discussed in Section A above, the projected direct and cumulative effects of future development have prompted the preparation of this Fee Study. All new non-residential development within the City, irrespective of location, contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on affordable housing demand and creates the need for more such housing to accommodate growth. The derivation of fee amounts for non-residential development is explained in detail in Sections V and VI of this Fee Study. These fees will be expended exclusively for the design, acquisition, and construction of new Affordable Housing, as that is the purpose for which this development impact fee is being collected. As previously stated, all new non-residential development creates either a direct impact or contributes to the cumulative impact on Affordable housing.

D DETERMINE HOW THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE NEED

FOR THE PUBLIC FACILITY AND THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED (IMPACT RELATIONSHIP) [GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(A)(4)]
As previously stated, new non-residential development within the City, irrespective of location, contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on Affordable Housing demand and creates the need for new Affordable Housing to accommodate growth. Moreover, the affordable housing needs identified in Section V are specifically a function of the employment growth and resulting worker households generated by projected non-residential development within the City and do not reflect any unmet needs of existing development.

For the reasons presented herein and in Section V, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for affordable housing and all new development within the City.

E THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE AND

THE COST OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT UPON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED ("ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY" RELATIONSHIP) [GOVERNMENT CODE 66001(B)]
As set forth above, all new non-residential development in the City impacts existing housing needs. Each individual non-residential development project and its related increase in employment, along with the cumulative impacts of all development in the City, will increase the need for housing. Thus, the imposition of a fee to finance new Affordable Housing is an efficient, practical, and equitable way to permit development to proceed responsibly.

New non-residential development directly and cumulatively impacts Affordable Housing City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
7 829

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION III

LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO JUSTIFY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
needs. The addition of new businesses generates new employment and resulting worker households. A certain number of these new worker households will require Affordable Housing. The proposed fee amounts are roughly proportional to the impacts of new development, based on the analyses in Section V. Thus, there is a reasonable relationship between the fee amount and the cost of subsidizing the necessary housing.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
8 830

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS

IV LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHIC ASSUMPTIONS
A Land Use Definitions and Employment Densities
Table 1 presented below provides a summary of the land uses covered in this Fee Study. As previously indicated, the Fee Study will determine the Linkage Fee for four (4) land use categories: commercial, office, industrial, and hotel/motel. Importantly, the table shown below is meant to provide an example of typical land uses found in each category and is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all the City's potential land uses.

Table 1: Summary of Land Use Categories
Land Use Classification Fee
Study
Definition
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Includes but is not limited to buildings used as the following:
• Retail;
• Service-oriented business activities, wineries/vineyards, and car washes; • Department stores, discount stores, furniture/appliance outlets, home improvement centers;
• Shopping centers and entertainment centers
• Subregional and regional shopping centers;
• Grocery stores and storage facilities.

Includes but is not limited to buildings used as the following:
■ Business/professional offices;
• Medical/dental offices;
• Office park, research park, business park; and
■ General office buildings.

Includes but is not limited to buildings used as the following:
• Light manufacturing, warehouse/distribution, and logistics wholesaling; • Wholesale and warehouse retail;
• Food processing;
• Industrial park; and
Industrial/light industrial.

Includes but is not limited to buildings used as the following:
• Hotel/Motel;
• Other Transient Occupancy
The existing non-residential square footage and employees per square foot was compiled and estimated using data provided by the City. As reflected in Table 2 below, the City has approximately 9.92 million total square feet of existing non-residential development; including approximately 1.74 million square feet of commercial/retail, 2.72 million square feet of office, 5.01 million square feet of industrial, and 460 thousand square feet of hotel/motel.

Additionally, per the City, there are 20,733 employees in these non-residential sectors, specifically 5,431 commercial employees, 7,911 office employees, 7,191 industrial employees, and 200 hotel employees. Notably, DTA utilized Nielsen Company Employment City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
831

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Profiles by NAICS Codes 2025 to verify the employee counts for each non-residential land use. The North American Industry Classification System ("NAICS") is the standard used by Federal statistical agencies in classifying business establishments for the purpose of collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. business economy.

Table 2: Estimated Existing Non -Residential Development Non -Residential Land Use
Existing Building
Square Feet
Employees per
Existing Employees 1,000 Square Feet
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel
Total
B Worker Household
1,735,238
2,716,194
5,010,579
460,000
9,922,012
5,431
7,911
7,191
200
20,733

3.13 2.91

1.44 0.43
NA
Since most households include more than one worker, the Fee Study groups employees generated by each land use into households to determine the total number of worker households for each land use type. According to the US Census American Community Survey, as of 2025 the City had 25,840 workers living in households and 17,182 households, averaging approximately 1.50 workers per household with workers. Therefore, the Fee Study estimates the number of employee households that each land use generates by dividing the total number of workers by 1.50. The resulting estimated number of households per 100,000 square feet is shown below.

Table 3: Estimated Households per 100,000 Square Feet
Non -Residential Land Use
Employees per Total Employees (1.50 Employees /
Total Households
1,000 Square Feet (100KSF Bldg.)
Household)
Commercial
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Total

3.13 2.91

1.44 0.43
NA
313
291
144
43 791
209
194
96 29
527
C Industry Sectors
As a first step in identifying affordable housing needs, the analysis evaluates the likely industry sectors that would comprise each of the four non-residential land uses.

These industry sectors are determined using the North American Industry Classification System ("NAICS"), which assigns numerical codes to each industry sector. NAICS codes group all industries into 22 major industry categories. The table below provides a percentage breakdown of occupations associated with each land use.

City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
April 15, 2026
10 832

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 4: Percentage Breakdown of Occupations by Land Use Industries by NAICS Code
Commercial/
Retail
Office
HoteU Industrial
Motel
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000)
Legal Occupations (23-0000)
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000)
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000)
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000)
Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000)
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 10% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0% Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 1%
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 6% Production Occupations (51-0000) 2% 0% 3% 4%
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 5% 0% 1% 10% Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
8%
8%
6%
2%
1%
0%
2%
0%
3%
1%
1%
2%
26%
4%
5%
6%
6%
10%
3%
0%
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
27%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
6%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
2%
23%
27%
6%
3%
24% 19%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 6%
9%
6%
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
11%
0%
37%
9%
Based on the percentage allocations derived from Table 4, the anticipated number of households by occupation was determined as shown in the table below.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
11 833

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 5: Number of Households by Occupation and Land Use Industries by NAICS Co
Commercial
/Retail
Office
Hotel/
Motel
Industrial
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)
17 16
13 12
19 5
2 1
0 8
6 1
5 0 0 2
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 2 1 0 0 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0 7 0 0 Legal Occupations (23-0000)
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000)
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 4 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
5 2
Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 2
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 4
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 53 0 7 0 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations 9 1 8 0 (37-0000)
Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 11 0 2 0 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 13 10 1 8
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 21 46 5 11 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0 0 0 0 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 2 0 0 35 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 13 1 2 9 Production Occupations (51-0000) 5 0 1 3
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 10 1 0 10 Total 209 194 29 96
0 0 1
52 0 0
38 0 0
0 1 0
D Income Distribution of Worker Households
The occupational data by household, determined above, provides a framework for estimating household income. DTA utilized the Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Occupation Statistics, which provides earnings data by occupation and includes a distribution of earnings by occupation. Notably, given that the City would likely draw employees from an area larger than its boundaries, the analysis was based on data for the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim Metropolitan Statistical Area (the "MSA").

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
12 834

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com
Wages by Occupation
(Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim MSA)

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 6: Wage Distribution by Occupation
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000)
Legal Occupations (23-0000)
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media
Occupations (27-0000)
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29- 0000)
Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000)
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000)
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-
0000)
Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance
Occupations (37-0000)
Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000)
Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000)
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000)
Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000)
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-
0000)
Production Occupations (51-0000)
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-
0000)
10th I 25th
percentil percentile
wage wage
$64,210
$50,040
$60,310
$63,820
$48,510
$42,420
$56,520
$37,240
$40,710
$87,720
$66,230
$80,830
$81,320
$64,350
$47,880
$77,630
$46,230
$54,000
Median percentile percen
Wage wage wag
75th 90th
$131,930
$89,470
$121,480
$106,540
$96,480
$62,700
$128,680
$65,520
$82,490
$196,390
$124,740
$160,230
$140,880
$127,540
$92,880
$210,550
$102,490
$122,090
$262,480
$164,730
$192,960
$178,290
$152,480
$118,700
$323,010
$130,030
$168,860
99th
rcentile
wage
$345,939
$203,538
$262,139
$221,299
$208,878
$150,783
$425,093
$177,839
$225,827
$48,550 $71,720 $105,750 $151,810 $179,990 $258,688
$34,600 $34,600 $34,860 $41,710 $50,050 $52,430
$36,880 $38,450 $47,340 $87,160 $125,430 $152,890
$34,390 $35,470 $36,960 $44,700 $52,610 $58,055
$34,820 $36,010 $39,030 $47,860 $59,860 $64,463
$34,100 $35,140 $37,040 $46,210 $63,060 $64,018
$34,830 $36,090 $43,950 $63,790 $102,570 $106,993
$37,260 $43,410 $50,930 $63,580 $79,140 $91,659
$35,210 $37,500 $43,680 $53,610 $76,490 $76,738
$45,100 $51,950 $69,600 $96,980 $122,980 $154,605
$39,590 $47,870 $63,270 $82,460 $107,690 $129,793
$35,780 $37,750 $45,710 $58,680 $77,070 $87,549
$35,360 $36,920 $43,720 $55,540 $74,050 $85,006
Notably, DTA also incorporated the household income limits for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households. Based on the 2025 HUD guidelines for multifamily tax subsidy projects, assuming a 3 -person household, the Area Median Income ("AMI") for Orange County is $152,300 per household. From this data other income levels, specifically, extremely low (30%), very low (50%), low (80%), and moderate (120%), were determined.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
13 835

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 7: Income Categories - Orange County
Income Category
Household Income
(3 -Person Household)
Median Income
Extremely Low (30%)
Very Low (50%)
Low (80%)
Moderate (120%)
$152,300
$45,690
$76,150
$121,840
$182,760
Data from Table 6 and Table 7 was then used to generate the percentage of households within each income category, as shown in the table below.

Table 8: Income Categories across Occupation
Income Categories by Occupation
(Los An• eles-Lon• Beach -Anaheim MSA)
30% AMI SO% AMI 80% AM 1
00% AMI 120% AMI
Above
120% AM
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)

0.53% 0.78% 1.99% 1.01% 0.88%

0.57% 1.65% 2.31% 0.77% 0.55%

0.25% 0.47% 0.95% 0.65% 0.51%

0.08% 0.15% 0.46% 0.21% 0.13%
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.09% 0.24% 0.35% 0.19% 0.05% Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.46% 1.02% 0.72% 0.22% 0.00% Legal Occupations (23-0000)

0.06% 0.11% 0.16% 0.08% 0.07%
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-

4.38% 6.01% 5.15% 1.57% 1.05%
0000)
Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media 0.30% 0.56% 0.59% 0.19% 0.14% Occupations (27-0000)
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-

0.53% 1.05% 1.70% 0.92% 0.84%
0000)
Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 2.90% 0.63% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.54% 0.27% 0.25% 0.12% 0.01% Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-

7.82% 2.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0000)
Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance

2.22% 1.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Occupations (37-0000)
Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 2.06% 0.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 2.14% 1.13% 0.83% 0.00% 0.00% Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 3.79% 6.35% 1.50% 0.00% 0.00% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.03% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.67% 2.64% 1.97% 0.53% 0.10% Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-

0.87% 1.90% 1.20% 0.18% 0.00%
0000)
Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.74% 0.58% 0.16% 0.00% 0.00% Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-

2.07% 1.44% 0.32% 0.00% 0.00%
0000)
Total 33.10% 31.09% 20.62% 6.65% 4.34%
City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study

2.26% 7.45%

0.36% 6.21%

0.49% 3.33%

0.10% 1.14%

0.05% 0.98%

0.00% 2.42%

0.24% 0.72%

0.00% 18.16%

0.15% 1.93%

0.54% 5.59%

0.00% 3.53%

0.00% 1.20%

0.00% 10.17%

0.00% 3.22%

0.00% 2.80%

0.00% 4.10%

0.00% 11.64%

0.00% 0.06%

0.00% 5.90%

0.00% 4.15%

0.00% 1.48%

0.00% 3.83%

4.19% 100.00%
14 836

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
The data in the table above provides an allocation of employees across occupations and income levels. However, in order to generate estimated employee counts by occupation, the data was realigned to each occupation as shown in Table 9, to determine the percentage of workers in each occupation that fall within each income level.

Table 9: Distribution of Occupation for Worker by Income Categories come Categories by Occupation
30% 50% 80%
AMI
Management Occupations (11-0000)
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000)
Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000)
Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000)
Legal Occupations (23-0000)
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000)

7.12% 10.50% 26.68% 13.61% 11.81% 30.29% 100%

9.13% 26.54% 37.27% 12.39% 8.84% 5.82% 100%

7.58% 14.00% 28.65% 19.65% 15.44% 14.67% 100%

7.16% 13.41% 40.57% 18.44% 11.36% 9.06% 100%

9.42% 24.76% 36.23% 19.48% 4.94% 5.17% 100%

18.98% 42.16% 29.74% 9.12% 0.00% 0.00% 100%

8.08% 15.86% 22.70% 10.56% 9.30% 33.49% 100%

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION IV

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS
E Worker Households by Income Level
The table below provides a summary of worker households by income for each land use.

This data was derived from the distribution of occupations by land use from Table 4, and the distribution of occupations for workers by income category from Table 9.

Table 10: Distribution of Worker Households by Land Use (100K Sq. Ft. Building) Land Use
(100}( SF Building)
30% AMI 50% AMI 80% AMI 100% AMI 120%
Above
120% AMI
Total
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Total
89 62
23 15
189
59 56
37 9
161
32 39
25 2
98 11
15 6
0 32
7 12
3 0
22 11
11 3
1 25
City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
209
194
96 29
527
16 838

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

AFFORDABILITY GAP AND

LINKAGE FEE CALCULATION

V AFFORDABILITY GAP AND LINKAGE FEE CALCULATION
A Affordability Gap
The next step in the Fee Study is to calculate the cost of housing the extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households by determining the per unit "financing gap" a developer would encounter when constructing a for -rent project. In other words, the cost to house a lower-income household is the difference between the value of a for -rent affordable unit and the cost to develop that unit. Notably, Low Income tax credit financing is assumed for the below -30% AMI, 30-50% AMI households, 50-80% AMI household, and 80-100% AMI households.

Table 11: Monthly Rental Estimates
Building Type
Monthly Rent
per Unit 1
Market Rate Unit
Below 30% AMI — Affordable Unit
30-50% AMI — Affordable Unit
50-80% AMI — Affordable Unit
80-100% AMI — Affordable Unit
$2,665
$1,142
$1,903
$3,046
$3,806
Notes:

Using the rental incomes above, the estimated valuation for units in each income tier was determined based on the Net Operating Income ("NOI") (i.e., rental income less operating expenses and vacancy) and a cap rate for for -rent developments. The resulting estimated valuation at each AMI level is shown in Table 12 below.

For purposes of this estimate, assumed vacancy rates and cap rates were based on current market snapshots from CoStar Property. DTA also assumed Low -Income Housing Tax Credits ("LIHTCs"), in the form of 4% Tax Credit Financing, would be available as a partial subsidy for developing rental units for households with incomes below 30% AMI only.

Finally, the actual construction cost for these rental units was estimated using data from recent LIHTC applications for projects in the City.

The Affordability Gap per unit is then calculated based on the construction cost less any tax credits less the estimated value of such unit. In cases where the estimated valuation is greater than the construction cost, then there is no Affordability Gap as shown in the table below.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
17 839

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

AFFORDABILITY GAP AND

LINKAGE FEE CALCULATION
Table 12: Estimated Per Unit Affordability Gap
Development Category
For Rent For Rent For Rent For Rent
Product Product Product Product
Affordable Affordable Affordable Affordable
30 AMI 50 AMI 80 AMI 100 AMI
Unit Size
Rental Limits
Gross Annual Rent
Less: Vacancies
Less: Operating Expenses
Projected Net Revenue
Cap Rate
Estimated Valuation
Direct Construction Costs
1,000
$1,142
$13,704
($480)
($5,500)
$7,724

4.40%
$175,554
($550,000)
1,000
$1,903
$22,836
($799)
($5,500)
$16,537

4.40%
$375,835
($550,000)
1,000
$3,046
$36,552
($1,279)
($5,500)
$29,773

4.40%
$676,652
($550,000)
1,000
$3,806
$45,672
($1,599)
($5,500)
$38,573

4.40%
$876,670
($550,000)
Tax Credits (limited to 30 AMI category only) 4% N/A N/A N/A Eligible Basis (75%) $412,500 N/A N/A N/A
Tax Credit Financing $165,000 N/A N/A N/A
Net Construction Cost
B Fee Calculation
($385,000) ($550,000) ($550,000) ($550,000)
Affordability Gap $209,446 $174,165 $0 $0
To determine the maximum justifiable Linkage Fee, the estimated worker households generated by each non-residential land use category at each income level, (divided by 100), as shown in Table 10, are multiplied by the corresponding per-unit affordability gaps shown in Table 12. The resulting amounts represent the maximum fee supported by the nexus analysis for each income category, and their sum represents the total maximum justifiable fee for each non-residential land use category, as shown in Table 13.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
18 840

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION V

AFFORDABILITY GAP AND

LINKAGE FEE CALCULATION
Table 13: Maximum Justifiable Fees
Land Use
1 30% AMI
50% AMI 80% AMI 100% AMI 120% AM
bove
0%
Total
Commercial/Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotel/Motel
Total
Affordability Gap
89 59
62 56
23 37
15 9
189 161
32 39
25 2
98 11
15 6
0 32
7 12
3 0
22 11
11 3
1 25
209
194
96 29
527
$209,446 $174,165 N/A $0 NA NA NA
Commercial/Retail $186.72 $102.56 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $289.28 Office $130.24 $97.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $227.27
Industrial $47.47 $63.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $111.11 Hotel/Motel $32.44 $16.43 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $48.87 The totals represent the ceiling for impact fees applicable to new non-residential development to mitigate its effect on affordable housing demand. These figures are not recommendations; they indicate only the maximums determined by this analysis.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
19 841

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

VI FEE IMPLEMENTATION

SECTION VI

All staff involved- across accounting, budgeting, and project management- must understand the distinction between linkage fees and other types of fees, as well as the rules governing how fee revenues may be used. The fees proposed in this report are tied to a specific purpose and must be spent accordingly.

B Indexing the Linkage Fee
The fees presented in this Fee Study are based on current construction costs and should be adjusted annually to account for inflation, as construction costs ultimately impact the cost of providing or subsidizing affordable housing. Therefore, DTA recommends that after adoption, the fee be reviewed each year and adjusted based on a reliable index, such as ENR's Construction Cost Index, which is generally used as the primary basis for indexing construction costs.

Affordable Housing : Most cities waive fees for projects that are 100% affordable housing.

Alternatives to Fees : Many cities allow developers to provide housing units or donate land instead of paying fees.

Public Projects : Fees are typically waived for publicly owned developments.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
20 842

dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION VI

FEE IMPLEMENTATION
■ Special Land Uses: Some cities offer waivers for non-profit buildings, religious institutions, educational facilities (both public and private), and similar land uses. ■ Small Buildings : Certain cities exempt smaller buildings from fees, for example, commercial buildings under 25,000 square feet.
■ Policy -Driven Reductions : To support broader policy goals, many cities reduce or exempt fees for specific types of development.

City of Placentia April 15, 2026
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study
21 843

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

APPENDIX A
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study

FEE CALCULATION
844

City of Placentia
Non -Residential Fee Tables
City Land Use/ Demoaranhics
Number of
Building Square Employees per Employees per
Unit Type Feet 1,000 Sq. Ft. [1] Household [2]
Commercial/Ret ail 2,251,291 3.13 1.50
Office 569,772 2.91 1.50
Industrial 4,419,470 1.44 1.50
Hotel/Motel 460,000 0.43 1.50
Total 7,700,533 NA NA
[1] Source: Based on information provided by the City.
(2) Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Tables S0802 and 82502.

Emnlovees and Households per 100.000 Sa. Ft.

Households
Employees per Total per 1,000 Sq.

Unit Type 1,000 Sq. Ft. Employees Ft.

Commercial/Retail 3.13 313 209
Office 2.91 291 194
Industrial 1.44 144 96
Hotel/Motel 0.43 43 29
Total NA 791 527
Distribution of New Worker Households by Income per 100.000 Sa. Ft. Non -Residential Development in 50% Area 80% Area 100% Area 120% Area Above 120%
30% Area Median Median Median Median Area Median
Unit Type Median Income Income Income Income Income Income Total Commercial/Retail 89 59 32 11 7 11 209
Office 62 56 39 15 12 11 194
Industrial 23 37 25 6 3 3 96
Hotel/Motel 15 9 2 0 0 1 29
Total 189 161 98 32 22 25 527
(1) Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, Employment Profiles by NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) Code Affordability Gap Analysis [i]
Unit Type
Affordability Gap - For Rent
50% Area 80% Area 100% Area
30% Area Median Median Median
Median Income Income Income Income
$209,446.36 $174,165.00 N/A N/A
(1) See Page 3, Affordable Housing Gap Analysis, for the detailed methodology, assumptions, and affordability gap calculations. 845

City of Placentia
Non -Residential Fee Tables
Maximum Justifiable Fee (Per Sq. Ft. of Non -Residential Development) [1] 50% Area Maximum
30% Area Median Justifiable
Unit Type Basis Median Income Income Fee
Commercial/Retail Per Sq. Ft. $186.72 $102.56 $289.28
Office Per Sq. Ft. $130.24 $97.03 $227.27
Industrial Per Sq. Ft. $47.47 $63.64 $111.11
Hotel/Motel Per Sq. Ft. $32.44 $16.43 $48.87
[1] Fee amounts are calculated by applying the applicable affordability gap to the distribution of employees by income category and summing the resulting amounts. The 80% and 100% area median income categories are not included because the affordability gap analysis identified no affordability gap at those income levels. 846

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

APPENDIX B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study

OCCUPATIONAL

STATISTICS
847

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics
Occupation Distribution by Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) CommerciaURetail Office Hotel/Motel Industrial Institutional Management Occupations (11-0000) 8% 6% 6% 9% 7%
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 8% 10% 2% 6% 4% Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 6% 3% 0% 1% 2% Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0% 3% 0% 0% 5% Legal Occupations (23-0000) 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0% 0% 0% 0% 46% Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 3% 0% 0% 1% 2% Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 1% 27% 0% 0% 6% Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 1% 20% 1% 0% 3% Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 2% 0% 2% 0% 1% Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 26% 0% 23% 0% 3% Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 4% 0% 27% 0% 4% Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 5% 0% 6% 0% 2% Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 6% 5% 3% 8% 0%
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 10% 24% 19% 11% 10% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 1% 0% 0% 37% 0% Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 6% 0% 6% 9% 1% Production Occupations (51-0000) 2% 0% 3% 4% 0%
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 5% 0% 1% 10% 1% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Households by Occupation b Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) CommerciaURetail Office Hotel/Motel Industrial Institutional Management Occupations (11-0000) 17 12 2 8 0
Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 16 19 1 6 0 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 13 5 0 1 0 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 5 0 0 2 0 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 2 1 0 0 0 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0 7 0 0 0 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 4 1 0 0 0
Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 1 0 0 0 0 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 5 0 0 1 0 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 2 52 0 0 0 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 2 38 0 0 0
Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 4 0 1 0 0
Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 53 0 7 0 0 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 9 1 8 0 0 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 11 0 2 0 0 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 13 10 1 8 0
Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 21 46 5 11 0 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0 0 0 0 0 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 2 0 0 35 0 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 13 1 2 9 0 Production Occupations (51-0000) 5 0 1 3 0
Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 10 1 0 10 0 Total 209 194 29 96 0
Appendix B - Page 1
848

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics
Distribution of Occupations for Households by Income Level 10th 75th 90th 99th
percentile 25th percentile percentile percentile percentile Occupations (SOC Codes) wage wage Median Wage wage wage wage Management Occupations (11-0000) $64,210 $87,720 $131,930 $196,390 $262,480 $345,939 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) $50,040 $66,230 $89,470 $124,740 $164,730 $203,538 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) $60,310 $80,830 $121,480 $160,230 $192,960 $262,139 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) $63,820 $81,320 $106,540 $140,880 $178,290 $221,299 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) $48,510 $64,350 $96,480 $127,540 $152,480 $208,878 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) $42,420 $47,880 $62,700 $92,880 $118,700 $150,783 Legal Occupations (23-0000) $56,520 $77,630 $128,680 $210,550 $323,010 $425,093 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) $37,240 $46,230 $65,520 $102,490 $130,030 $177,839 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) $40,710 $54,000 $82,490 $122,090 $168,860 $225,827 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) $48,550 $71,720 $105,750 $151,810 $179,990 $258,688 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) $34,600 $34,600 $34,860 $41,710 $50,050 $52,430 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) $36,880 $38,450 $47,340 $87,160 $125,430 $152,890 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) $34,390 $35,470 $36,960 $44,700 $52,610 $58,055 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) $34,820 $36,010 $39,030 $47,860 $59,860 $64,463 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) $34,100 $35,140 $37,040 $46,210 $63,060 $64,018 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) $34,830 $36,090 $43,950 $63,790 $102,570 $106,993 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) $37,260 $43,410 $50,930 $63,580 $79,140 $91,659 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) $35,210 $37,500 $43,680 $53,610 $76,490 $76,738 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) $45,100 $51,950 $69,600 $96,980 $122,980 $154,605 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) $39,590 $47,870 $63,270 $82,460 $107,690 $129,793 Production Occupations (51-0000) $35,780 $37,750 $45,710 $58,680 $77,070 $87,549 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) $35,360 $36,920 $43,720 $55,540 $74,050 $85,006 Total NA NA NA NA NA NA
Distribution of Occupations for Households by Income Level 30% Area 50% Area 80% Area 100% Area 120% Area Above 120% Median Median Median Median Median Area Median
Occupations (SOC Codes) Income Income Income Income Income Income Management Occupations (11-0000) 7.12% 10.50% 26.68% 13.61% 11.81% 30.29% Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 9.13% 26.54% 37.27% 12.39% 8.84% 5.82% Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 7.58% 14.00% 28.65% 19.65% 15.44% 14.67% Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 7.16% 13.41% 40.57% 18.44% 11.36% 9.06% Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 9.42% 24.76% 36.23% 19.48% 4.94% 5.17% Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 18.98% 42.16% 29.74% 9.12% 0.00% 0.00% Legal Occupations (23-0000) 8.08% 15.86% 22.70% 10.56% 9.30% 33.49% Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 24.10% 33.09% 28.35% 8.65% 5.81% 0.00% Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 15.62% 28.82% 30.41% 9.85% 7.51% 7.80% Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 9.41% 18.84% 30.48% 16.53% 15.06% 9.68% Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 82.16% 17.84% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 45.36% 22.73% 20.51% 10.21% 1.19% 0.00% Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 76.88% 23.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 68.86% 31.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 73.58% 26.42% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 52.19% 27.59% 20.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 32.58% 54.54% 12.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 55.06% 34.72% 10.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 11.29% 44.69% 33.36% 9.00% 1.66% 0.00% Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 21.05% 45.73% 28.98% 4.24% 0.00% 0.00% Production Occupations (51-0000) 49.94% 39.31% 10.75% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 54.17% 37.56% 8.27% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total NA NA NA NA NA NA
Appendix B - Page 2
849

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics
Income Categories across Occupation
30% Area 50% Area 80% Area 100% Area 120% Area Above 120% Median Median Median Median Median Area Median
Occupations (SOC Codes) Income Income Income Income Income Income Management Occupations (11-0000) 0.53% 0.78% 1.99% 1.01% 0.88% 2.26% Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 0.57% 1.65% 2.31% 0.77% 0.55% 0.36% Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 0.25% 0.47% 0.95% 0.65% 0.51% 0.49% Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.08% 0.15% 0.46% 0.21% 0.13% 0.10% Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.09% 0.24% 0.35% 0.19% 0.05% 0.05% Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.46% 1.02% 0.72% 0.22% 0.00% 0.00% Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.06% 0.11% 0.16% 0.08% 0.07% 0.24% Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 4.38% 6.01% 5.15% 1.57% 1.05% 0.00% Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.30% 0.56% 0.59% 0.19% 0.14% 0.15% Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.53% 1.05% 1.70% 0.92% 0.84% 0.54% Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 2.90% 0.63% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.54% 0.27% 0.25% 0.12% 0.01% 0.00% Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 7.82% 2.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 2.22% 1.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 2.06% 0.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 2.14% 1.13% 0.83% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 3.79% 6.35% 1.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.03% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.67% 2.64% 1.97% 0.53% 0.10% 0.00% Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.87% 1.90% 1.20% 0.18% 0.00% 0.00% Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.74% 0.58% 0.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 2.07% 1.44% 0.32% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total 33.10% 31.09% 20.62% 6.65% 4.34% 4.19%
30% AMI Households by Occupation b Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) CommerciaURetail Office Hotel/Motel Industrial Institutional Management Occupations (11-0000) 1239 0.885 0.127 0.586 0.000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 1.451 1.713 0.052 0.568 0.000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 0.957 0.412 0.004 0.105 0.000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.366 0.004 0.000 0.116 0.000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.186 0.121 0.000 0.039 0.000 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.049 1.254 0.000 0.000 0.000 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.309 0.051 0.000 0.004 0.000 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.166 0.033 0.007 0.000 0.000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.832 0.057 0.013 0.104 0.000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.210 4.870 0.000 0.017 0.000 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 1.255 31.266 0.118 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 1.694 0.114 0.299 0.066 0.000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 41.097 0.105 5.074 0.047 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 6.220 0.416 5.315 0.308 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 8.271 0.302 1.351 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 6.821 4.959 0.404 4.242 0.000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 6.972 15.044 1.786 3.511 0.000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.074 0.000 0.016 0.119 0.000 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.185 0.000 0.010 3.992 0.000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 2.673 0.110 0.368 1.895 0.000 Production Occupations (51-0000) 2.574 0.137 0.373 1.721 0.000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 5.548 0.327 0.171 5.222 0.000 Total 89.148 62.181 15.489 22.664 0.000
Appendix B - Page 3
850

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics
50% AMI Households by Occupation & Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) CommerciaURetai! Office Hotel/Motel Industrial Institutional Management Occupations (11-0000) 1.828 1.306 0.187 0.865 0.000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 4.218 4.980 0.152 1.651 0.000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 1.768 0.762 0.008 0.195 0.000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.686 0.008 0.000 0.217 0.000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.488 0.319 0.000 0.103 0.000 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.108 2.785 0.000 0.000 0.000 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.605 0.100 0.000 0.008 0.000 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.229 0.045 0.009 0.000 0.000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 1.534 0.105 0.025 0.192 0.000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.420 9.751 0.000 0.035 0.000 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.272 6.790 0.026 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.849 0.057 0.150 0.033 0.000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 12.361 0.032 1.526 0.014 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 2.813 0.188 2.404 0.139 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 2.969 0.108 0.485 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 3.606 2.621 0.214 2.242 0.000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 11.671 25.183 2.989 5.878 0.000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.046 0.000 0.010 0.075 0.000 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.733 0.000 0.038 15.797 0.000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 5.807 0.240 0.800 4.117 0.000 Production Occupations (51-0000) 2.027 0.108 0.293 1.355 0.000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 3.847 0.227 0.119 3.621 0.000 Total 58.886 55.713 9.436 36.538 0.000
80% AMI Households by Occupation & Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) CommerciaURetai! Office Hotel/Motel Industrial Institutional Management Occupations (11-0000) 4.644 3.317 0.475 2.197 0.000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 5.923 6.993 0.214 2.319 0.000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 3.618 1.559 0.016 0.398 0.000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 2.075 0.023 0.000 0.658 0.000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.715 0.467 0.000 0.150 0.000 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.076 1.964 0.000 0.000 0.000 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.866 0.142 0.000 0.011 0.000 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.196 0.039 0.008 0.000 0.000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 1.619 0.111 0.026 0.202 0.000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.680 15.771 0.000 0.056 0.000 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.766 0.051 0.135 0.030 0.000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 2.643 1.921 0.157 1.643 0.000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 2.757 5.948 0.706 1.388 0.000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.014 0.000 0.003 0.022 0.000 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.547 0.000 0.029 11.793 0.000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 3.680 0.152 0.507 2.609 0.000 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.554 0.029 0.080 0.371 0.000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.848 0.050 0.026 0.798 0.000 Total 32.221 38.539 2.383 24.647 0.000
Appendix B - Page 4
851

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics
100% AMI Households by Occupation & Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) CommerciaURetail Office Hotel/Motel Industrial Institutional Management Occupations (11-0000) 2.369 1.692 0.242 1.121 0.000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 1.969 2.325 0.071 0.771 0.000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 2.482 1.069 0.011 0273 0.000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.943 0.011 0.000 0.299 0.000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.384 0.251 0.000 0.081 0.000 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.023 0.602 0.000 0.000 0.000 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.403 0.066 0.000 0.005 0.000 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.060 0.012 0.002 0.000 0.000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.524 0.036 0.008 0.065 0.000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.369 8.552 0.000 0.031 0.000 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.381 0.026 0.067 0.015 0.000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.148 0.000 0.008 3.182 0.000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.538 0.022 0.074 0.382 0.000 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 10.594 14.664 0.485 6.224 0.000
120% AMI Households by Occupation & Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) CommerciaURetail Office Hotel/Motel Industrial Institutional Management Occupations (11-0000) 2.057 1.469 0.210 0.973 0.000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 1.405 1.659 0.051 0.550 0.000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 1.950 0.840 0.009 0.214 0.000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.581 0.006 0.000 0.184 0.000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.097 0.064 0.000 0.021 0.000 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 0.355 0.058 0.000 0.005 0.000 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.040 0.008 0.002 0.000 0.000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.400 0.027 0.006 0.050 0.000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.336 7.791 0.000 0.028 0.000 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.045 0.003 0.008 0.002 0.000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.027 0.000 0.001 0.585 0.000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 7.293 11.926 0.287 2.612 0.000
Appendix B - Page 5
852

Appendix B
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Analysis
Occupational Statistics
Above 120% AMI Households by Occupation & Land Use
Occupations (SOC Codes) CommerciaURetail Office Hotel/Motel Industrial Institutional Management Occupations (11-0000) 5.273 3.766 0.539 2.494 0.000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations (13-0000) 0.925 1.092 0.033 0.362 0.000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations (15-0000) 1.853 0.798 0.008 0.204 0.000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations (17-0000) 0.464 0.005 0.000 0.147 0.000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations (19-0000) 0.102 0.067 0.000 0.021 0.000 Community and Social Service Occupations (21-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Legal Occupations (23-0000) 1.278 0.210 0.000 0.016 0.000 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations (25-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations (27-0000) 0.416 0.028 0.007 0.052 0.000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations (29-0000) 0.216 5.011 0.000 0.018 0.000 Healthcare Support Occupations (31-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Protective Service Occupations (33-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations (35-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations (37-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Personal Care and Service Occupations (39-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sales and Related Occupations (41-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations (43-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations (45-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Construction and Extraction Occupations (47-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations (49-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Production Occupations (51-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (53-0000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 10.526 10.977 0.587 3.315 0.000
Appendix B - Page 6
853

www.FinanceDTA.com
dta/

APPENDIX C
City of Placentia
Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Justification Study

AFFORDABILITY GAP

ANALYSIS
854

r4
www.FinanceDTA.com
18201 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 220
IRVINE, CA 92612
PHONE: (800) 969-4DTA
Public Finance
Public -Private Partnerships
Development Economics
Clean Energy Bonds

3;kc,25,Eggolk
Agenda Item No: 3.a

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: April 21, 2026
Submitted by: Teri Knutson
From: Police Department
Subject:

PROPOSED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.74 (FIREWORKS) TO TITLE 10 (PEACE, MORALS, AND SAFETY)

OF THE PLACENTIA MUNICIPAL CODE
Financial Impact:

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Summary:

There is currently limited mechanism for the enforcement of the use of fireworks within the City of Placentia. The addition of Chapter 10.74 to the Municipal Code will provide for clear regulations prohibiting fireworks within the City and for the enforcement of any violation of these regulations.

Recommendation:

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

Waive full reading, by title only, and introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 0-2026-06, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, adding Chapter 10.74 (Fireworks) to Title 10 (Peace, Morals, and Safety) of the Placentia Municipal Code.

Strategic Plan Statement:

This item conforms to Strategic Plan Goal No. 2: Public Safety, to provide a safe, family - friendly environment through proactive policing, efficient fire and emergency medical services, disaster preparedness, and strong community partnerships that protect residents, businesses and visitors.

Discussion:

Fireworks pose a significant risk of personal injuries, property damage, fires and other threats to public safety. Currently the Placentia Municipal Code is limited, other than in the Fire Code, in regard to regulation of fireworks. If unregulated, the possession, storage, use, manufacture, transportation, and sale of fireworks will continue to pose a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents.

The attached Ordinance confirms the prohibition of fireworks, even safe and sane, within the City. The Ordinance allows for enforcement for violations of the proposed prohibition. It also 857

provides for those individuals who will be deemed responsible to be cited and subject to additional penalties.

Attachments
Ordinance No. 0-2026-06 - Fireworks.docx
Fireworks Ordinance Powerpoint.pptx
858

ORDINANCE NO. 0-2026-06

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 10.74 (FIREWORKS) TO TITLE 10 (PEACE, MORALS,

AND SAFETY) OF THE PLACENTIA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING

THE REGULATION OF FIREWORKS WITHIN IN THE CITY OF

PLACENTIA
City Attorney's Summary
This Ordinance would result in an amendment to Title 10 (Peace, Morals, and Safety) of the Placentia Municipal Code by adding Chapter 10.74 (Fireworks). This Chapter establishes regulations governing the possession, storage, use, manufacture, transportation, and sale of fireworks within the City of Placentia.

WHEREAS, the City of Placentia has the authority under its police power to enact regulations for the public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the unregulated possession, storage, use, manufacture, transportation, and sale of fireworks pose a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents; and
WHEREAS, fireworks pose a significant risk of personal injuries, property damage, fires and other threats to public safety; and
WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code section 12541 authorizes the City Council to establish local regulations on fireworks; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Placentia finds that establishing an ordinance to regulate the possession, storage, use, manufacture, transportation, and sale of fireworks will promote the public health, safety, and welfare.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.74 (Fireworks) is hereby added to Title 10 (Peace, Morals, and Safety) of the Placentia Municipal Code to be read as follows:

Chapter 10.74 Fireworks
§10.74.010 Definitions
§10.74.020 Prohibition
§10.74.030 Displays
§10.74.040 Exceptions
§10.74.050 Seizure and disposal
Ordinance No. 0-2026-06

Page 1 of 7 ends

Placentia City CouncilApril 21, 2026

Placentia City Council
April 21, 2026