Jeff Olsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Christine Schneider <[email protected]>
Wednesday, April 14, 2021 9:58 AM
Jeff Olsen
Dino Angelosante; Jill Suitos-Novak; Richard Broad; Mark Seedall CCWD comment letter on the Choice in Aging Project, 490 Golf Club Road, PLN 18-0445--in response to the proposed meeting on 5/6/21
Choice in Aging Project PLN 18-0445.pdf; Choice in Aging Notice-490 Golf Club Road_ 040721.pdf
Hi Jeff-CCWD is in receipt of the City's latest Notice for an Application Coordination Team Meeting, to be held on Thursday, May 6, 2021 (attached). I have reviewed this new Notice and don't see anything that would affect any of the comments that we made in or letter dated August 27, 2020 (also attached). As stated below, please let us know if there have been substantive changes since 8/27/2020 or if there are changes as a result of the comments made at this Application Coordination Team Meeting on May,. -Otherwise, our comments are still completely applicable and we will wait to hear from you on any future changes that could alter (or not alter) these comments.
Thank you, Christine
From: Christine Schneider
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 1:44 PM
To: Jeff Olsen <[email protected]>
Cc: Colleen Knutson <[email protected]>; Dino Angelosante <[email protected]> Subject: FW: CCWD comment letter on the Choice in Aging Project Hi Jeff-the Contra Costa Water District (District) is in receipt of the City of Pleasant Hill's Notice of Public Hearing for the Architectural Review Commission for this Project. While there may be changes to the proposed project as a result of this Commission Hearing, the District.does not expect to comment at this time, as nothing should have changed between the date of our comment letter (8/27/2020, see below and attached). If there have been substantive changes since 8/27/2020, please let us know. Otherwise, we will wait to hear from you on any future changes that could alter (or not) the District's comments.
Thank you, Christine
From: Christine Schneider
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 4:59 PM
To: Jeff Olsen <[email protected]>
Cc: Colleen Knutson <cknutson@ __ ccwater.co(!l>; Dino Angelosante <[email protected]> Subject: CCWD comment letter on the Choice in Aging Project Hi Jeff-please see attached comment letter for the Choice in Aging Project. We have tried to be as comprehensive as possible and have solicited all comments from all of our departments here at CCWD.
However, since we don't have a copy of an updated arborist report, we can'tcomment on the three trees that are on the property line between the canal and the project site. I believe that they are OK to be removed, based on the previous arborist report. If you want to send me the new arborist report (when you get it) I'm happy to look at it.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
1 Thanks, Christine
2 CONTRA COSTA
WATER DISTRICT
August27,2020
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Lisa M. Borba, AICP
PRESIDENT
Connstance Holdaway
VlCE PRESIDENT
Erneato A. Avila, P.E.
Bette Boatmun
John A. Burgh
GENERAL MANAGER
Stephen J, Welch, P.E., S.E.
Sent via Hard Copy and Email: [email protected] Jeff Olsen, Associate Planner
Public Works and Community Development Department
City of Pleasant Hill
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Subject: Choice in Aging Project (#PLN 18-0445)
Dear Mr. Olsen:
The Contra Costa Water District (CCWD/ District) is in receipt of the City of Pleasant Hill's request for comments related to the abovementioned project (APN # 170-082-009). The Proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan/Planned Unit Development (rezoning} proposed by Choice in Aging, and Satellite Affordable Housing Associates (SAHA), to modify a portion of the project site1s existing Semi-Public and Institutional General Plan designation to a General Plan designation of Multi-Fa-mily Residential, and a Rezoning request to change the current R-7 Single Family Residential -High Density zoning district to a PUD Planned Unit District/Specific Plan. The project also includes other permits such as a Development Plan permit, a Use Permit, an Architectural Review Permit, and a Minor Subdivision. The APN is 153-030-004.
More specifically, the applicant intends to develop the single-parcel (4-acre) project site into three legal parcels, and demolish/construct the scope of the pr~ject In seven phases:
Phase 1: Existing Choice in Learning use would temporarily relocate to another portion of the current project site to accommodate phase 2.
Phase 2: Construction of the proposed 82-unit senior housing facility (by SAHA), to include a commur:iity room and two elevators, that would consist of both three and four~story sections.
Phase 3: Construct a new preschool facility to include drop"off area and outdoor play area. Two classrooms would accommodate up to 90 children.
Phase 4: Demolish and consolidate temporary Choice in Learning and Choice in Aging spaces. After Choice in Learning is built, Choice In Aging will demolish the western portion of their existing spaces, and consolidate Choice In Aging's services to make room for the new Choice In Aging building.
Phase 5: Choice in Aging's program space will be enlarged to accommodate two shifts in the Adult Day Health Care program, a room for the mid-to-late Alzheimer's program, language-specific program Jeff Olsen, Associate Planner
City of Pleasant Hill
August 27, 2020
Pagel
rooms, physical and occupational therapy, etc. The new building would consist of both one and twostory sectlons. Administrative offices, conference rooms, etc. wiU be on the second floor. • Phase 6: Demolish remaining Choice in Aging building, and courtyard open space, and replace it with a fawn, gazebo, therapeutic gardens, and outdoor terraces for Choice in Aging. • Phase 7: Future medical clinic and assisted living construction. In the event of available financing, Choice in Aging will continue the planning and construction of a future medical clinic and three-story assisted living facility.
The project site is located entirely within the service boundary of the CCWD. The, District will provide treated (potable) water services to the Project (per CCWD Code of Regulations Section 5). The following are the Djstrict's comments:
1) The proposed development is at an elevation In a low pressure area, which means that it may not receive standard water pressure. Further evaluation is needed by CCWD ofthe finished floor elevations. If the pressure is below the District1s standard pressure range, the District's Board of Directors will need to approve whether or not service can be provided to this project through a Moqified Pressure Service Agreement {MPSA). Approval of a MPSA will require the private installation-and maintenance of a District approved booster pump that boosts pressure within the District's standard pressure range.
2) As stated above, there is a proposed medical clinic that is part of a future phase. AU services should have Reduced Pressure Devices installed during the first phase so that adequate backflow protection doesn't become an issue at a later date.
3) Water service may require abo~e ground backflow prevention devices, which could reduce water pressure to below standard. Proper planning ·is necessaty to ensure backflow prevention devices are located appropriately.
4) Existing water infrastructure will need to be evaluated and any modifications will need to be designed and constructed at the Developer's/Owner's expense. 5) Each premise ~o be provided domestic service will require its own service connection and meter. 6) A separate meter for landscape Irrigation may be required. 7) A separate ffre service may be required for each building or premise. 8) Relocation and/or abandonment of CCWD facilities may be required which will require a quitclaim of the existing easements. Easements for proposed facilities may also be required. 9) Relocation of public facilities must be performed by District forces.
Jeff OlsenJ Associate Planner
City of Pleasant Hill
August 27, 2020
Page3
10) The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) mandates certain separation requirements of water mains that are parallel to and/or crossing sewer and storm drains. Grading and/or utility plans should be developed to comply with all separation criteria mandated in SWRCB Section 64572.
11) The California Residential Code requires Installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in all new residential structures that are submitted to the Building Department after December 31, 2010. Appropriate backflow prevention is required for all services where sprinkler systems are installed.
12) Further information and answers to a number of frequently asked questions regarding water service and District regulations can be found on the District's web site at ww«,ccwater.com.
Should you require any further clarification on the District's comments, please contact Cindy Sweeney/Engineering Department at 925-688-8014.
s~
Christine Schneider
Senior Planner
CS:ck
Jeff Olsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Bradley Olazo < [email protected]>
Monday, April 19, 2021 3:54 PM
Jeff Olsen
Attachments:
Michelle Cordis; Jeff Carlton; [email protected]; [email protected] FC District Comments - 490 Golf Club Rd: Choice in Aging - Satellite Affordable Housing - Choice in Learning Project - Architectural, Development, and Use Permit FCD Comments - Notice of a City Council Public Hearing - 490 Golf Club Road; 2021-0121 - DA 89 Fee Calc.pdf
Hello Jeff,
The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District) has received the request for comments for the Choice in Aging - Satellite Affordable Housing - Choice in Learning Project located at 490 Golf Club Road in the city of Pleasant Hill (APN 153-030-004) and dated April 7, 2021. We have previously commented on this project on August 25, 2020, October 12, 2020, December 14, 2020, and most recently on January 21, 2021. I've attached our most recent comments for reference.
We ha\le no additional comments at this time, but we would like to note that to obtain an accurate estimate of the Drainage Area 89 fees due for this project, the-developer should submit to us a document showing the pre-project and post-project impervious surface (e.g. stormwater control plan).
Let me know if you have questions.
Thanks,
Bradley Olazo I Engineering Technician
Contra Costa County Public Works: Flood Control & Water Conservation District 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553
p: 925.313.2308 I e: [email protected] I ccc ublicworks.org 1 Jeff Olsen
From: Bradley Olazo < [email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 9:57 AM
To: Jeff Olsen
Cc:
Subject
Michelle Cordis; Jeff Carlton; [email protected]; [email protected] FC District Comments - 490 Golf Club Rd: Choice in Aging - Satellite Affordable Housing - Choice in Learning Project
Attachments: 2020-08 DA 89 Fee Estimate.pdf
Hello Jeff,
The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District) has received the request for comments for the Choice in Aging - Satellite Affordable Housing - Choice in Learning Project located at 490 Golf Club Road in the city of Pleasant Hill (APN 153-030-004). We understand this project consists of subdividing the 4.04-acre parcel into 3 legal lots for the construction of an adult day healthcare, montessori preschool, senior affordable housing center, assisted living housing units, a medical clinic, and hospice. We submit the following comments for this development:
Conditions of Approval (COA):
1. Prior to the city recording the final map, the applican shall pay the Drainage Area 89 (DA 89) fees.
General Comments:
2. This project is located in DA 89 for which drainage fees are due in accordance with Flood Control Ordinance No. 2002-40. By Ordinance, all building permits or subd. i ion maps lied in this area are subject to the provisions of the drainage fee ordinance. Effective January 1, 2020, the current fee in this drainage area is $0.85 per quare foot of newly er ated impervious surface.
3. The District is not the approving local agency for this project as defined by the Subdivision Map Act. As a special district, the FC District has an independent authority to collect drainage fees that is ot restricted by the Subdivision Map Act~ The District reviews the drainage fee rate every year the ordinance is in effect, and adjusts the rate annually on January 1 to account for inflation. The drainage fee rate does not vest at the time of tentative map approval. The drainage fees due and payable will be based on the fee in effect at the time of fee collectio .
4 The DA 89 Fee for this project is estimated to be $127,705 based off the copy of the application, the project description, and the provided project plans we received on A gust 4, 2020. The project will be subdivided into 3 parcels which will each have different land uses. Based off the provided documents, Parcel A will be developed as a senior housing center with 82 units and was charged the multi-family residential SD rate for units with an average size less than 2500 sq-ft, Parcel Bis potentially planned for a medical clinic, assisted living building, and hospice, and was charged at the SD commercial rate, and Parcel C will be developed as an adult day healthcare and a Montessori preschool, and was charged the SD office-medium rate. The drainage area fee for this lot should be collected prior to filing the final map. Please refer to the attached calculation sheet for a summary of the fee estimate and the table below for the assumed land uses.
Parcel Size Land Uses Fees
IA 1y84 Adult Day Healthcare and Mortessori Pnaschoof S 61.590.32 IB 0.69 Assisted Ufino Housin.:, Units. Medical Clinic. HosO:c-e S 25.906.05 ,C 1.46 Senior Affordab?e Housing S 40.208.40 Totaf DA 89 Fee fstimate: $, 127.705
1 5. The developer may be eligible for credit against their drainage area fees for existing impervious surface area on the property. The develo er's engineer should submit a worksheet, which includes a scalable map1 that calculates the ded ction of fees for the existing i pervious su ace and the total amount of credit requested.
6. We recommend that the City condition the developer to design and construct storm drain facilities to adequately collect and convey stormwater entering or originating within the development to the nearest adequate man-made drainage facility or natural watercourse, without diversion of the watershed.
7. The developer should be required to submit hydrology and hydraulic calculations to the City that prove the adequacy of the in-tract drainage system and the downstream drainage system. We defer review of the local drainage to the City. However, the FC District is available to provide technical review under our Fee-for-Service program.
8. The applicant should be required to comply with the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES} requirements under the City Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinances and the C.3 Guidebook. We support the State's goal of providing best management practices to achieve the permanent reduction or elimination of stormwater pollutants and downstream erosion from new development. The FC District is available to provide technical assistance for meeting these requirements under our Fee-for-Service program:
If you have questions, please contact me at 925-313-2308 or by e-mail at Bradle 1.0lazo .us. 1 hanks,
Bradley Olazo I Engineering Technician
Contra Costa County Public Works: Flood Control & Water Conservation District 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, C 94553
p: 925.313.2308 I e: Bradley Olazo(aJpw cccounty.us I ccg>ublicworks.org 2 Jeff Olsen
From: Bradley Olazo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 6:05 PM
To: Jeff Olsen
Cc:
Subject:
Michelle Cordis; Jeff Carlton; [email protected]; [email protected] FCD Comments - 490 ·Golf Club Road IS/MND
Attachments:
Hi Jeff,
2020.,08 DA 89 Fee Estimate.pdf; FC District Comments - 490 Golf Club Rd: Choice in Aging - Satellite Affordable Housing - Choice in Learning Project The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District) has reviewed the Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) dated September 2020 and prepared by the City of Pleasant Hill (City) with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. for the Choice in Aging - Satellite Affordable Housing - Choice in Learning Project located at 490 Golf Club Road in the city of Pleasant Hill (APN 153-030-004). We submit the following comments:
General Comments
Comments #1 - #4 are repeat comments from the attached e-mail sent on 8/25/2020
1. This project is located within Drainage Area 89 (DA. 89), for which a drainage fee is due in accordance with Flood Control Ordinance Number 2002-40. By ordinance, all building permits or subdivision maps filed in this area are subject to the provisions of the drainage fee ordinance. Effective January 1, 2020, the current fee in this drainage area is $0.85 per square foot of newly created impervious surface. The City should collect the drainage area fee for this lot prior to filing the final map.
2. The FC District is not the approving local agency for this project as defined by the Subdivision Map Act. As a special district, the FC District has an independent authority to collect drainage fees that is not restricted by the Subdivision Map Act. The FC District reviews the drainage fee rate every year the ordinance is in effect and adjusts the rate annually on January 1 to account for inflation. The drainage fee rate does not vest at the time of tentative map approval. The drainage fees due and payable will be based on the fee in effect at the time of fee collection.
3. The DA 89 Fee for this project is estimated to be $127,705 based off the copy of the application, the project description, and the provided project plans we received on August 4, 2020. The project will be subdivided into 3 parcels which will each have different land uses. Based off the provided documents, Parcel A will be developed as a senior housing center with 82 units and was charged the multi-family residential SD rate for units with an average size less than 2500 sq-ft, Parcel Bis potentially planned for a medical clinic, assisted living building, and hospice, and was charged at the SD commercial rate, and Parcel C will be developed as an adult day healthcare and a Montessori preschool, and was charged the SD office-medium rate. The drainage area fee for this lot should be collected prior to filing the final map. Please refer to the attached calculation sheet for a summary of the fee estimate and the table.below for the assumed land uses.
Parcel Size Land Uses Fees
A t84 Adult Dsv Hea!'thcare and Moriessori Preschoo! $ 61,590.32 B 0.69 Assisted LMno Housino Units_ Medical Clinie. Hosc-;ce $ 25 906.05 C 1~46 Se.nior Affnrdabte Housing s 40.208.40 .
Total DA 89 Fee Estimate: $ 127.706
1 4. The developer may be eligible for credit against their drainage area fees for existing impervious surface area on the property. The developer's engineer should submit a worksheet, which includes a scalable map, that calculates the deduction of fees for the existing impervious surface and the total amount of credit requested.
Comments on the 15/MND
Our review of the document focused on the Hydrology section and Utilities section. Our comments pertaining to those specific sections are below:
5. The Hydrology Section (Page 87-88) notes that onsite bioretention basins and other low impact development strategies will be used to mitigate the increased stormwater flows resulting from this project, and would ensure that post project flows would not exceed the existing conditions. If the applicant has submitted hydrology calculations to the City that demonstrates the amount of runoff that would be generated by the project would not exceed the pre-project conditions, we recommend that be referenced or cited in the document.
Please note that the FC District does not recommend the use of bioretention areas sized to meet Contra Costa Clean Water Program C.3 requirements for mitigating peak flows. We recommend that onsite detention of the project's flows be mitigated without accounting for storage within the bioretention basins.
6. The Utilities Section (Page 141) notes that the project drains offsite into existing drainage facilities on Golf Club Road. If there was a hydrology and hydraulics study done that verifies the adequacy of the in-tract drainage system and the downstream drainage system, we recommend that be referenced or cited in the document.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on developments within the City and welcome continued coordination. If you have any questions, please contact me.
Thanks,
Bradley Olazo I Engineering Technician
Contra Costa County Public Works: Flood Control & Water Conservation District 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553
p: 925.313.2308 I e: [email protected] I cccpublicworks.org 2 Jeff Olsen
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Don Avelar <[email protected]>
Thursday, April 29, 2021 6:12 AM
Jeff Olsen
Rashida Kamara; Melody Reebs
Subject: #PLN 18-0445 Choice in Aging-Satellite Affordable Housing-Choice in learning Project Good morning Jeff,
Sorry for the late response, Due to Covid, been mostly working from home .
The only comment I have is our Paratransit does provide service to this site.
Question: Is there a designated area for Paratransit drop off and pick up? Don
Don Avelar
Chief Service Scheduler
Phone; 925-680-2085
Mobile: 925--250-8395
Email: [email protected]
2477 Arnold Industrial Way
Concord. Ca 94520
www.cccta.org
1 7
I
Contra·Costa County
May 6, 2021
Mr. Olsen
Public Works and Community Development Dept.
City of Pleasant HHI
100 Gregory Ln.
Pleasant Hill. CA 94523
Fire Protection District
Subject: Choice in Aging, Choice in Learning and Satellite Affordable Housing 490 GoH Club Rd. Pleasant Hill
Project # PLN 18-0445
CCCFPD Project No.: P-2020-03730
Dear Mr. Olsen.
We have reviewed the land use permit application to demolish an existing building complex in phases and construct in phase 1, a 6,969 square foot, single story, type V-8 construction, 1-4 facility, a 24,718 square foot, 2 story. type V-B construction. 1-4 facility, and a 68,528 square foot. 4 story, type V-A construction, R-2 affordable senior housing with 82 units.
Phase 2 ~ constn,Jction is a 2,260 square foot, single story clinic and a 24,300 square foot, 3 story, unknown type construction, R-2.1 occupancy assisted living facility with an unknown number of units.
It appears that the 4 story, type V-A, 68,528 square foot R-2 affordable senior housing may not comply with the CBC Table 506.2.
Modifications to the buildings will require Tenant Improvement plans to be submitted and approved by the Fire District
The following Is required for Fire District approval In accordance with the 2019 California Fire Code (CFC). the 2019 California Building Code (CBC), the 2019 California Residential Code (CRC), and Local and County Ordinances and adopted standards:
1. Access shall comply with Fire Qistrict requirements.
If the R-2 constructed during phase 2 of construction contains more than 18 dwelling units (for a total of more than 100 units on the site) a second access point shall be required before phase 2 construction begins. (CFC §D106.1, 503.2.2).
Provide e~ergency apparatus access roadways with all-weather (paved) driving surfaces of not less than 20-feet unobstructed width. and not less than 13 feet 6 inches of vertical clearance, to within 150 feet of travel distance to all portions of the exterior walls of every building. Access shall have a minimum outside turning radius of 45 feet, and must be capable of supporting the imposed fire apparatus loading· of 37 tons. Acc&ss roadways shall not exceed 20% grade. Grades exceeding 16% shall be constructed of grooved concrete per the attached Fire District standard. (503) CFC 4005 Port Chicago Highway,~-# 250 • Concord, California 94520 • Telephone (925) 941-3300 • Fax (925) 941-3309 www.cccfpd.org
Buildings that meet the foUowing criteria shall comply with Aerial Fire Apparatus Access.
Aerial Fire Apparatus Access is required where the vertical distance between grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet as measured in accordance with Appendix D, Section 105 of the 2019 CFC. Aerial access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders, in the Immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. At least one of the required routes shall be located within ·a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the ~erial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus roa~ and building.
A construction traffic management plan will be required to ensure that the occupied buildings traffic and construction traffic do not impede Fire Department Access.
2. Access roadways of less than 28-feet unobstructed width shall have signs posted or curbs painted red with the words NO PARKING - FIRE LANE clearly marked. (22500.1) CVC, (503.3) CFC
Access roadways of 28 feet or greater, but less than 36-feet unobstructed width shall have NO PARKING - FIRE LANE signs po~ted, allowing for par~ing on one side only or curbs painted red with the words NO PARKING-FIRE LANE clearly marked. (22500.1) eve, (503.3) CFC
3. Provide emergency escape and rescue openings in Group R o~upancies of type V construction. Basements and sleeping rooms below the fourth story above grade plane shall have at least one exterior emergency escape and rescue opening. Such openings shall open directly into a public way or to a yard or court that opens to a public way.
Landscaping, signage and other obstructions must not hinder the positioning of firefighting ground ladders from apparatus access to the rescue windows.
4. New buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders. An emergency responder radio coverage system shall be installed when the conditions of CFC 510.4.1 are not met. Testing shall be conducted and the results submitted to the Fire · District prior to the building final. (510.1) CFC
5. Access gates for Fire District apparatus shall be a minimum of 20-feet wide. Access gates shall slide horizontally or swing inward and shall be located a minimum of 30 feet from the street. Electrically operated gates s~II be equipped with a Knox Company key-operated switch. Manually operated gates shall be equipped with an approved Fire District lock.
Contact the Fire District for information on ordering the key-operated switch. (D103.f>) CFC.
6. The developer shall provide an adequate and reliab1e water supply for fire protection with a minimum fire flow of 2375 GPM. Required flow must be delivered from not more than 3 hydrants flowing simultaneously for a duration of 120 minutes while maintaining 20-pounds residual pressure in the main. (507.1), (B105) CFC
7. The developer shall provide hydrants of the East Bay type in compliance with Chapter 5 and Appendix B and C of the California Fire Code. (C103.1) CFC
8. A land development permit is required for access and water supply review and approval prior to submitting building construction plans. '-
The developer shall submit a minimum of two (2) copies of full size, scaled site improvement plans indicating:
All existing or proposed hydrant locations,
Fire apparatus access,
Aerial fire apparatus access,
A construction traffic management plan
Elevations of building,
Size of building and type of construction,
Striping and signage plan
Provide drawings for paths from the public way to under emergency escape and rescue openings showing a proposed clear path and clear space under these openings that allow for the placement of ground ladders at a climbing angle of 70 to 75 degrees and a minimum of 18"' clearance from the base of the ladder to any obstruction ($ee attached ground ladder access ~tandard).
This Is a separate submittal from the bui/dlna. c:onstructlon. plans. These plans shall be approved prio;to submitting building plans for review. (501.3) CFC
9. Emergency apparatus access roadways and hydrants shall be Installed, in service, and inspected by the Fire District prior to construction or combustible storage on site. (501.4) CFC
Note: A temporary aggregate base or asphalt grinding_s roadway is not considered an all-weather surface for emergency apparatus access. The first lift of asphalt concrete paving shall be installed as the minimum roadway material and must be engineered to support the designated gross vehicle weight of 37 tons.
10. The developer shall provide traffic signal pre-emption systems (Opticom) on any new or modified traffic signals Installed with this development. (21351) eve ·
11. Flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall not be located on the site without obtaining approval and necessary permits from the Fire District. (3401.4) CFC
12. The owner or the owner's authorized agent shall be responsible for the development, implementation and maintenance of a written plan establishing a fite prevention program at the project site applicable throughout all phases of the co_nstruction. The plan shall be made available for review by the fire code official upon request. (Ch.33) CFC
13. The fire prevention program superintendent shall develop and maintain an approved prefire plan in cooperation with the fire chief. The fire chief and fire code official shall be notffied of changes affecting the utilization of information contained in such prefire plans. (Ch.33} CFC
14. The developer shall submit a minimum of two (2) complete sets of building construction plans and specifications of the subject project, including pl'ans for any of the following required deferred submittats, to the Fir~ District for review and approval prior to construction to ensure compliance with minimum requirements related to fire and life safety. Plan review and inspection fees shall be submitted at the time of plan review submittal. (105.4.1) CFC, (901.2) CFC, (107) CBC
• Private underground fire service water mains
• Fire sprinklers
e Fire pump if applicable
• Standpipe
• Fire alarm
• Carbon Dioxide Systems
• Energy System for generator if applicable
• Commercial kitchen hood extinguishing systems
• Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System {ERRCS)
Our preliminary review comments shall not be construed to encompass the complete project.
Additional plans and specifications may be required after further review.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at (925) 941-3300.
Sincerely,
1 L/ 1~5)!_
Todd Schiess
Fire Inspector I
cc: Choice in Aging
490 Golf Club Rd.
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
[email protected]
Satellite Affordable Housing Associates
1835 Alcatraz Ave.
Berkeley, CA 94703
[email protected]
File: 490 GOLF CLUB RD-PLN-P-2020..03730-REV1