Pleasant Hill City Council
August 1, 2022

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
AUGUST 1, 2022
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM

VIA TELECONFERENCING
Watch on YouTube at: www.pleasanthillca.org/councilmeeting To provide comments via teleconference, click on the meeting link and enter the meeting ID and Passcode:

Meeting link: www.zoom.us
Meeting ID: 846 7780 4972
Passcode: 025762
The meeting ID and Passcode will change each meeting. See more information on Public Participation Options below.

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 1 August 1, 2022
City Offices, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone (925) 671-5267 MAYOR MICHAEL G. HARRIS COUNCILMEMBER KEN CARLSON

VICE MAYOR TIMOTHY FLAHERTY COUNCILMEMBER SUE NOACK

COUNCILMEMBER MATTHEW RINN
The meeting will be held via teleconference as allowed pursuant to City Council resolution. Options for observing the meeting and participating in public comment are provided below.

Public Communication. The public is welcome to address the City Council on items on the Consent Calendar or other items not listed on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction during the general Public Comment period. There is an opportunity for the public to comment on other agenda items at the time they are discussed.

Public Participation Options
1) Watch the Meeting via Youtube Livestream
Watch the meeting live on YouTube at: www.pleasanthillca.org/councilmeeting. 2) Submit Written Comments Before the Meeting
Send written comments to [email protected] (comments received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be provided to the City Council before the meeting). 3) If You Wish to Make a Public Comment During the Meeting When the Mayor invites the public for general comment or comments on specific agenda items, please use the "Raise hand" feature in Zoom (or press *9 if connecting via telephone only) which will alert staff that you wish to speak, and you will be invited to speak when it is your turn. Note that there may be multiple hearing items on the same agenda. There are two ways to join the meeting and make a public comment during the meeting:

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 2 August 1, 2022
a. Go to www.Zoom.us using your computer and entering the Meeting ID and Passcode provided near the top of this page. You will be placed into the meeting as an Attendee. You will not be seen or heard until it is your turn to speak; or
b. Call (669) 900-6833 and enter Meeting ID and Passcode. Dial *9 to virtually “Raise Hand” in Zoom.

We ask that you state your name and city of residence for the record when you start your comments.

When you are making a Public Comment during the meeting, please:
1) Try to be in a room or space without a lot of background noise. 2) Mute your microphone until it is your turn to speak. 3) Have a strong, reliable internet connection or cell phone signal.

If, due to a disability, a reasonable accommodation is needed to participate in this meeting, please contact the ADA Coordinator 24 hours in advance of the meeting at (925) 671-5221 or via California Relay at 711.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection by contacting the City Clerk’s office at [email protected] or calling 925-671-5221.

City Council Meeting Recordings and Broadcasts.

Recorded City Council meetings are broadcast on Comcast Channel 28, Wave Channel 1029, and AT&T UVerse Channel 99 on the Wednesday following the meeting. Video recordings are generally available within 48 hours of the meeting, and may be viewed on the City’s website at www.pleasanthillca.org/MeetingVideos and selecting “City Council” from the meeting groups.

Agendas are Available for Review on the City Hall official noticing bulletin board (100 Gregory Lane), at the Pleasant Hill Police Department (330 Civic Drive), the Pleasant Hill Senior Center (233 Gregory Lane), and on the City’s website at www.pleasanthillca.org/agendas. Agenda packets will be available to the public on the City’s website at the same time as they are made available to the City Council.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PRESENTATIONS

3.1 Award of Appreciation to Jack Noyes for Service on the Concord/Pleasant Hill Health Care District (CPHHCD) Grant Committee from 2012-2022, and Introduction of New CPHHCD Grant Committee Member Patricia Tanquary

3.2 Introduction of Reappointed Library Commissioners Katherine Bracken (Primary) and Julia Dozier (Alternate)

3.3 Award of Appreciation to Tracy Ervin-Lowery for Service on the Educaton Commission from 2011 - 2022

3.4 Proclamation Designating August 31, 2022 as Overdose Awareness Day City Council Meeting Agenda Page 3 August 1, 2022

4. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
(Brief updates on pending City business without discussion by the City Council.)

5. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS

5.1 Reports from Councilmembers on Meetings or Conferences Attended at City Expense

5.2 Announcements from Councilmembers

6. PUBLIC COMMENT:

The public is welcome at this time to address the City Council on items on the Consent Calendar or other items not listed on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction. There is an opportunity for the public to comment on other agenda items at the time they are discussed.

Comments are limited to three minutes per speaker. To provide public comments, please see the Public Participation Options above.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under “Consent Calendar” are considered by the Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate Council discussion of these items unless requested by a Councilmember prior to the time Council votes on the motion to adopt.

7.1 Approve Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting of July 11, 2022

7.2 Approve Checks Dated: July 15, 2022; July 22, 2022.

7.3 Accept Update on Contra Costa Transportation Authority and TRANSPAC

7.4 Reaffirm Resolution No. 33-22 Approving Continued Teleconferenced, Hybrid or In-Person Meetings of All City Legislative Bodies Pursuant to the Provisions of AB 361

7.5 Adopt Resolution No. ___-22 Designating Councilmember Ken Carlson as a Voting Delegate at the League of California Cities Annual Conference from September 7-9 in Long Beach, California

7.6 Adopt Resolution No. ___-22 Approving and Authorizing the City Engineer to Record Final Map and Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Subdivision Agreement with CDP PH Holding LLC for Subdivision 9520 (401 Taylor Boulevard)

7.7 Adopt Resolution No. ___-22 Authorizing a Request to the State of California, Department of Transportation for the Allocation of 2022 Highway Safety Improvement Program Cycle 11 Grant Funds

7.8 Adopt Resolution No. ___-22 Authorizing a Request to the U.S. Department of Transportation for the Allocation of 2022 Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program Funds

7.9 Adopt Resolution No. ___-22 Authorizing a Request to the U.S. Department of Transportation for the allocation of 2022 Reconnecting Communities Pilot Discretionary Grant Program Funds

7.10 Adopt Resolution No. ___-22 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group to Prepare a Local Roadway Safety Plan

7.11 Adopt Resolution No. ___-22 Authorizing a Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of 2002 One Bay Area Grant (Cycle 3) Funds City Council Meeting Agenda Page 4 August 1, 2022

7.12 Adopt Resolution No. ___-22 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Sunny Neon, Inc. for the Purchase and Replacement of LED Panels for the LED Sign at City Hall

7.13 Approve Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act

7.14 Adopt Resolution No. ___ - 22 Approving Amendments to the Authorized American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds Projects and Programs

8. PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

8.1 Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. ___-22, Approving a Development Plan Permit & Architectural Review Permit Amendment (PLN 18-0198) for the Cambria Hotel Project Including Site Improvements at 3131 and 3195 North Main Street and 1531 Oak Park Boulevard (Assessor Parcel Numbers 170-092-050, 054, 055, 057, 058, 059) This item has been reviewed previously under the California Environmental Quality Act through the certification of an Environmental Impact Report

8.2 Adopt Resolution No. ___-22 Authorizing a First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for Design Services with Ruggeri-Jensen-Azar for the Diablo Vista Water System 12” Main Replacement Phase II Project

8.3 Adopt Resolution No.___-22 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with Swinerton Management and Consulting for Project, Construction, and Project Management Services and Resolution No. ___-22 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Fifth Amendment to the Agreement with Bohlin Cywinski Jackson for Architectural and Design Services for the New Library

8.4 Approve Letter Opposing SB 932 (Portantino) General plans: Circulation Element: Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans

8.5 Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. __-22 to Deny an Appeal and Uphold the Decision of the Planning Commission to Deny a Reasonable Accommodation Request (PLN 21-0497) for an Accessory Structure within Setback Area and a Fence/Gate Exceeding Allowable Heights at 406 Kahrs Avenue
Item is continued to September 12, 2022

9. ADJOURNMENT
Next City Council Meeting: September 12, 2022

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: APPROVE MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 11, 2022

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Approve the minutes.

ATTACHMENT(S):

July 11, 2022 – Tentative Minutes
Prepared by: Carol Wu, City Clerk Recorder

7.1 Packet Pg. 5

MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
July 11, 2022
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 July 11, 2022
Mayor Harris called a Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:00 PM via teleconference, complete proceedings of which were electronically recorded. The meeting agenda was posted on the City Hall outdoor bulletin board at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA on July 7, 2022, by Deputy City Clerk Juanita Davalos.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Michael G. Harris Mayor Present
Timothy M. Flaherty Vice Mayor Present
Ken Carlson Councilmember Present
Sue Noack Councilmember Present
Matthew Rinn Councilmember Present
Mayor Harris stated that the City Council had adjourned from a closed session and that there was nothing to report.

3. PRESENTATIONS

3.1 Introduction of Education Commissioners Marisa Graves, Ashley McDonald and Jennifer Moore
Vice Mayor Flaherty introduced Marisa Graves, Ashley McDonald, and Jennifer Moore, the new Commissioners of the Education Commission.

3.2 Update on Water Supply, Drought Program, and Conservation Resources - Contra Costa Water District
John Burgh, Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) Director, provided a presentation on CCWD’s water supply and drought conservation programs.

3.3 Update on Water Supply, Conservation, and Investments in Infrastructure - East Bay Municipal Utility District
John Coleman, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Director, provided a presentation on EBMUD’s water supply, conservation programs, and infrastructure investments.

4. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:

June Catalano, City Manager, reported that:
 The grand opening and ribbon cutting for the new Pleasant Hill Library will be held on July 30, 2022 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.;

7.1.a
Packet Pg. 6
Attachment: July 11, 2022 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 July 11, 2022
 Applications are available for projects for Community Service Day to be held on September 24, 2022; and
 The Community can sign up on the City’s website to receive bi-weekly updates from City Hall.

5. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS

5.1 Reports from Councilmembers on Meetings or Conferences Attended at City Expense
(A) Contra Costa Mayors Conference Hosted via Teleconference on July 7, 2022
Mayor Harris noted the event was not at the City’s expense, but he reported his attendance at the Contra Costa Mayors Conference.

Councilmembers Carlson and Noack reported their attendance at the Contra Costa Mayors Conference.
(B) Other Meetings Attended at City Expense
None

5.2 Announcements from Councilmembers
Mayor Harris, Vice Mayor Flaherty, and Councilmembers Carlson and Rinn reported their attendance at the Fourth of July celebrations. The Councilmembers thanked the Fourth of July Commission for a successful event.

Mayor Harris reported his attendance at the Summer Concert by the Lake held on July 10, 2022.

Vice Mayor Flaherty reminded the public that the Blues and Brews Festival will be held on July 15-16, 2022.

6. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Harris opened public comment.

There was no public comment.

Mayor Harris closed public comment.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion (Flaherty/Carlson) to Approve all consent items excluding item 7.5, which was pulled for further discussion, carried as follows:

7.1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: July 11, 2022 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 July 11, 2022
AYES: Carlson, Flaherty, Noack, Rinn, Harris

7.1 Approve Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting of June 27, 2022

7.2 Approve Checks Dated: June 24, 2022 and June 30, 2022

7.3 Reaffirm Resolution No. 33-22 Approving Continued Teleconferenced, Hybrid or In-Person Meetings of All City Legislative Bodies Pursuant to the Provisions of AB 361

7.4 Adopt Resolution No. 55-22 Authorizing the Mayor and the City Manager to Execute a Successor Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Pleasant Hill and the Pleasant Hill Police Association

7.6 Adopt Resolution No. 57-22 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Applied Video Solutions, Inc., for the Purchase and Installation of the Openpath Access Control System at the Pleasant Hill Police Department

7.5 Adopt Resolution No. 56-22 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with American Guard Services for the Provision of Crossing Guard Services for the 2022-2023 School Year - Item Pulled from Consent Vice Mayor Flaherty, Councilmember Noack, Pleasant Hill Police Lieutenant Jason Kleven, and City Engineer Ananthan Kanagasundaram discussed sources of payment for school crossing guards and engineering solutions for school zone safety.

Motion (Flaherty/Noack) to Approve item 7.5, carried as follows:

AYES: Carlson, Flaherty, Noack, Rinn, Harris

8. ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE

8.1 Adopt Resolution No. 58-22 Approving the City of Pleasant Hill Investment Policy Retroactive to July 1, 2022 and Delegating Investment Authority to the Elected City Treasurer
Andrew Kalinowski, Interim City Treasurer, provided an update on the Pleasant Hill Investment Policy.

Carlos Oblites, Chandler Asset Management, delivered a presentation on the revisions to the City’s investment policy.

No one from the public spoke on the item.

Motion (Noack/Rinn) to Approve item 8.1, carried as follows:

AYES: Carlson, Flaherty, Noack, Rinn, Harris

7.1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: July 11, 2022 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 July 11, 2022

9. PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

9.1 Adopt Resolution No. 59-22 Approving the FY 2022/27 Capital Improvement Plan and Expenditures for FY 2022/23 and FY 2023/24
Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer, delivered a presentation on the item.

No one from the public spoke on the item.

Motion (Noack/Carlson) to Approve item 9.1, carried as follows:

AYES: Carlson, Flaherty, Noack, Rinn, Harris

10. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 9:09 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held on Monday, August 1, 2022, beginning at 7:00 p.m.

CAROL W. WU, CITY CLERK RECORDER

7.1.a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: July 11, 2022 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: APPROVE CHECKS DATED: JULY 15, 2022; JULY 22, 2022.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Approve the check register.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Check Register
Prepared by: Sabrina Kwan, Accounting Technician II
Approved by: Erick Cheung, Finance Manager

7.2 Packet Pg. 10

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

7.2.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ACCEPT UPDATE ON CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY AND TRANSPAC

SYNOPSIS
Each month, TRANSPAC meets to provide direction to its staff and make recommendations to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) on significant transportation and land use issues. The attachments to this report include the CCTA Executive summary and Board meeting minutes for May 18, 2022, and the TRANSPAC Board meeting summary minutes for May 12, 2022.

DISCUSSION
Background
TRANSPAC was formed in 1986 to provide the cities of Central Contra Costa County a forum to discuss mutual planning and transportation issues. When Measure C, a countywide transportation proposition, was adopted in 1988, TRANSPAC became the official regional transportation, land use, and housing forum for Central Contra Costa County. The member agencies include Contra Costa County, Clayton, Concord, Martinez, Walnut Creek, and Pleasant Hill.

TRANSPAC meets monthly to discuss transportation-related issues. A Councilmember and a Planning Commissioner represent each jurisdiction. The Chair to the CCTA then submits the actions.

Analysis
An Executive Summary of the actions taken on May 18, 2022, at the CCTA Board meeting is included along with the meeting minutes. The actions taken at the TRANSPAC Board meeting on May 12, 2022, are also included in the attached minutes.

There is no item of discussion directly related to the City of Pleasant Hill with this update.

FISCAL IMPACT
None

7.3 Packet Pg. 46

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, in the City Clerk’s office, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page and are available in the City Clerk’s office.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Accept the report.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
The City Council may want to discuss one or more of the actions taken during the last meeting.

Should the City Council require detailed information pertaining to any issues, a comprehensive report could be scheduled for a subsequent City Council meeting. Contingent on the amount of information required, staff will need adequate time to prepare a comprehensive report addressing the item or items.

ATTACHMENT(S):

CCTA Executive Summary and Board Meeting Minutes for May 18, 2022 TRANSPAC Committee Meeting Summary Minutes for May 12, 2022 Prepared and Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.3 Packet Pg. 47

COMMISSIONERS
Chris Kelley,
Chair
Federal Glover,
Vice Chair
Newell Arnerich
Tom Butt
Teresa Gerringer
Loella Haskew
David Hudson
Karen Mitchoff
Sue Noack
Lamar Thorpe
Holland White
Timothy Haile,
Executive Director
2999 Oak Road
Suite 100
Walnut Creek
CA 94597
PHONE: 925.256.4700
FAX: 925.256.4701
www.ccta.net
https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2022/May 18, 2022 RTPC Memo.doc

MEMORANDUM
To: Matt Todd, TRANSPAC
Brian Bornstein, SWAT
Robert Sarmiento, TRANSPLAN
Lisa Bobadilla, TVTC
John Nemeth, WCCTAC
Bret Swain, LPMC
From: Timothy Haile, Executive Director
Date: May 25, 2022
Re: Items of interest for circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs)
At its May 18, 2022 meeting, the Authority discussed the following items, which may be of interests to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees:

A. Innovative Deployments to Enhance Arterials Grant – Central Transit Signal Priority (TSP) System – Authorization to Execute Agreement No. 582 with Global Traffic Technologies, LLC (GTT), Funding Agreement No. 08C.06 with the City of Walnut Creek and Funding Agreement No. 08C.07 with the City of Concord for Central TSP Implementation Services
Recommendation: Staff sought authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 582 with GTT in an amount not‐to‐exceed $245,937, Funding Agreement No. 08C.06 with the City of Walnut Creek, and Funding Agreement No. 08C.07 with the City of Concord, to provide central TSP implementation services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

Action: The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Agreement No. 582 with GTT in an amount not‐to‐exceed $245,937, Funding Agreement No. 08C.06 with the City of Walnut Creek, and Funding Agreement No. 08C.07 with the City of Concord,

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) RTPC Memorandum
May 25, 2022

https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2022/May 18, 2022 RTPC Memo.doc to provide central TSP implementation services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

B. Draft 2022 Measure J Strategic Plan
Recommendation: Staff sought comments on the format and contents of the Draft 2022 Measure J Strategic Plan. Formal approval will be sought in July 2022.

Action: The Authority Board heard this item. This was an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

C. Consider the Conduct for Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the Authority for June 2022
Recommendation: Staff recommended that the Authority Board discuss the findings that the Contra Costa Health Services released regarding the revised Recommendations for Safely Holding Public Meetings dated April 15, 2022, which encourages online meetings and a written safety protocol requiring social distancing, requiring or strongly encouraging masks, and recommending a teleconferencing option be provided for the public if a determination is made to hold in‐person meetings, and provide direction to staff on the conduct of meetings for June 2022 to adhere to the 30‐day requirement of Assembly Bill 361.

Action: The Authority Board authorized staff to continue conducting meetings remotely for all legislative bodies of the Authority through August 2022 in accordance with the Brown Act provision exemptions of Assembly Bill 361 with 30‐day reconsiderations.

D. Approval to Distribute the Measure J Calendar Years 2020 & 2021 Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist (Checklist) for Allocation of Fiscal Year 2021‐22 and 2022‐23 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Funds Recommendation: Staff sought approval of the Checklist for distribution to local jurisdictions and feedback on future potential additions to the Checklist.

Action: The Authority Board approved the Checklist for distribution to local jurisdictions.

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) RTPC Memorandum
May 25, 2022

https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2022/May 18, 2022 RTPC Memo.doc E. Award and Authorize Execution of Agreement No. 585 to Bird Rides, Inc. (Bird) in Response to Request for Proposals No. 22‐02 to Provide a Bike and Scooter (Micromobility) Share Pilot Program in the City of San Ramon with Possible Expansion into the Town of Danville, City of Walnut Creek, and Unincorporated Contra Costa County Areas Along the Iron Horse Trail (IHT) if Approved by the Local Jurisdictions Recommendation: Staff sought authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 585 with Bird asthe selected vendor for a two‐year Shared Micromobility Pilot Program to operate in the City of San Ramon with possible expansion to the Town of Danville, City of Walnut Creek, and unincorporated Contra Costa County areas along the IHT as determined by the communities and the East Bay Regional Park District, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

Action: The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Agreement No. 585 with Bird as the selected vendor for a two‐year Shared Micromobility Pilot Program to operate in the City of San Ramon with possible expansion to the Town of Danville, City of Walnut Creek, and unincorporated Contra Costa County areas along the Iron Horse Trail as determined by the communities and the East Bay Regional Park District, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language,
F. Approval to Release Proposed One Bay Area Grant Cycle 3 (OBAG 3) Program and Call for Projects
Recommendation: Staff sought approval for release of the proposed OBAG 3 Program and Call for Projects, and authorization of the nomination of four Technical Coordinating Committee Members and four Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Members to serve on the Application Review Panel.

Action: The Authority Board authorized staff to release the proposed One Bay Area Grant Cycle 3 Program and Call for Projects meeting the requirements ofthe Metropolitan Transportation Commission with strong advocacy for geographic equity across Contra Costa County as projects are selected and authorized the nomination of four Technical Coordinating Committee Members and four Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Members to serve on the Application Review Panel.

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
MEETINGDATE: Wednesday, May 18, 2022
MINUTESPREPAREDBY: Tarienne Grover
MEMBERSPRESENT: STAFFPRESENT: MEMBERSABSENT:

Chris Kelley, Chair
Federal Glover, Vice Chair
Newell Arnerich, Commissioner
Tom Butt, Commissioner
Teresa Gerringer, Commissioner
Dave Hudson, Commissioner
Tim McGallian, Commissioner Alt.

Karen Mitchoff, Commissioner
Sue Noack, Commissioner
Lamar Thorpe, Commissioner
Mark Foley, Ex­Officio Rep.

Maureen Powers, Ex­Officio Rep.

Amy Worth, Ex­Officio Rep.

Colin Clarke
Peter Engel
Tarienne Grover
Timothy Haile
Jack Hall
John Hoang
Stephanie Hu
Brian Kelleher
Matt Kelly
Hisham Noeimi
Ivan Ramirez
Yuliana Tjeng
Linsey Willis
David McCray, Legal Counsel
Holland White, Commissioner

1. CONVENE MEETING: Chris Kelley, Chair
DISCUSSION: Chair Kelley convened the meeting at 6:00 PM. Commissioners Haskew and White were absent. Commissioner Alt. McGallian attended on behalf of Commissioner Haskew.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public are invited to addressthe Authority regarding any item that is not listed on the agenda. Please refer to the Teleconferencing Special Notice for Public Comment guidelines.

DISCUSSION: There were no public comments on items not on the agenda.

4. PRESENTATIONS

CONSENT CALENDAR
ACTION: Commissioner Hudson moved to approve the consent calendar, seconded by Commissioner Gerringer. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
May 18, 2022

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner White
Abstain‐None

5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Authority Board Minutes of April 20, 2022

6. Administration & Projects Committee ‐ Consent:

A. Accept Monthly Accounts Payable Invoice Report for March2022 Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the monthly accounts payable invoice report for March 2022.

B. Accept Quarterly Sales Tax Revenue Report for the Period Ended December 31, 2021
Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the quarterly sales tax revenue report for the period ended December 31, 2021.

C. Accept Quarterly Cash and Investment Report for the Period Ended March 31, 2022 Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the quarterly cash and investment report for the period ended March 31, 2022.

D. Acceptance of Annual Single Audit for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2021 Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the Single Audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021.

E. Accept Annual Measure J Compliance Audits for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021
Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the Measure J compliance audits for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021.

F. Program and Project Management (PPM) Servicesforthe Construction Program – Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 521 with Cole Management and Engineering, Inc. (CME) for PPM Services Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 521 with CME, to provide additional PPM services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language. This amendment will extend the agreement termination date from June 30, 2022 to June 30, 2024.

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
May 18, 2022

G. Legislative Update
Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on legislation, along with address any questions that may arise. The Authority may take action on any item presented on the attachments or any State or Federal legislation pertaining to the Authority’s legislative program.

7. Planning Committee ‐ Consent:

A. Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 523 with Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. (Nelson\Nygaard) to Add an Additional $58,700 in Funding to Support the Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan (ATSP) Task Force and Implementation of the ATSP
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 523 with Nelson\Nygaard in the amount of $58,700 of which $31,700 is from additional Measure J funds and $27,000 in Measure X funds, for a new total agreement value of $498,700, to continue implementation of the ATSP, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language. In addition, staff seeks approval of an additional $20,000 ($10,000 in Measure J funds and $10,000 in Measure X funds) outside of Agreement No. 523 for additional resources/expertise, if necessary.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS

8. Administration & Projects Committee ‐ Regular:

A. Innovative Deploymentsto Enhance Arterials Grant – Central Transit Signal Priority (TSP) System – Authorization to Execute Agreement No. 582 with Global Traffic Technologies, LLC (GTT), Funding Agreement No. 08C.06 with the City of Walnut Creek and Funding Agreement No. 08C.07 with the City of Concord for Central TSP Implementation Services
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 582 with GTT in an amount not‐to‐exceed $245,937, Funding Agreement No. 08C.06 with the City of Walnut Creek, and Funding Agreement No. 08C.07 with the City of Concord, to provide central TSP implementation services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

ACTION: Commissioner Arnerich moved to authorize the Chair to execute Agreement No. 582 with Global Traffic Technologies, LLC in an amount not‐to‐ exceed $245,937, Funding Agreement No. 08C.06 with the City of Walnut Creek, and Funding Agreement No. 08C.07 with the City of Concord, to provide Central

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
May 18, 2022

Transit Signal Priority implementation services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language, seconded by Commissioner Hudson. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner White
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Hisham Noeimi, Director, Programming provided a brief background and overview of the partners and roles for the project, project goals, project area, funding, concepts considered, vendor selection process, and project schedule.

Commissioners and Representatives provided comments. Staff responded to the comments.

B. Draft 2022 Measure J Strategic Plan
Recommendation: Staff seeks comments on the format and contents of the Draft 2022 Measure J Strategic Plan. Formal approval will be sought in July 2022.

DISCUSSION: Hisham Noeimi, Director, Programming, provided a brief background of the 2022 Measure J Strategic Plan, discussed the annual sales tax revenue forecast, savings from completed projects, the reprogramming of savings, the goal of maintaining sub‐regional equity, the status of project delivery, and a summary of projected funding and programming in the plan including anticipated constrained cash flow in 2024.

This was an informational item only; no action was taken.

C. NEW ITEM: Consider the Conduct for Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the Authority for June 2022
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Authority Board discuss the findings that the Contra Costa Health Services released regarding the revised Recommendations for Safely Holding Public Meetings dated April 15, 2022, which encourages online meetings and a written safety protocol requiring social distancing, requiring or strongly encouraging masks, and recommending a teleconferencing option be provided for the public if a determination is made to hold in‐person meetings, and provide direction to staff on the conduct of meetings for June 2022 to adhere to the 30‐day requirement of Assembly Bill 361. If the Authority Board should decide not to continue solely remote meetings, the Authority Board would no longer conduct teleconferencing meetings under Government Code Section 54953(e).

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
May 18, 2022

ACTION: Commissioner Hudson moved to authorize staff to continue conducting meetings remotely for all legislative bodies of the Authority through August 2022 in accordance with the Brown Act provision exemptions of Assembly Bill 361 with 30‐ day reconsiderations,seconded by Commissioner Butt. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwisenoted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner White
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Tarienne Grover, Director, Administrative Services, provided a brief background and an update of the local recommendations from the Contra Costa Health Services as revised on May 16, 2022, which are still recommending social distancing measures and online meetings due to increasing cases in Contra Costa County, and an update on the projects in the Boardroom and public access issue.

Commissioners provided comments. Commissioner Hudson recommended that all legislative body meetings of the Authority remain remote through August 2022. There was consensus from Commissioners.

9. Planning Committee ‐ Regular:

A. Approval to Distribute the Measure J Calendar Years 2020 & 2021 Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist (Checklist) for Allocation of Fiscal Year 2021‐22 and 2022‐23 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Funds Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the Checklist for distribution to local jurisdictions and feedback on future potential additions to the Checklist.

ACTION: Commissioner Arnerich moved to approve the Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist for distribution to local jurisdictions, seconded by Commissioner Noack. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner White
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Matt Kelly, Senior Transportation Planner, provided a brief background and overview of the Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist with no changes reported other than adding an electronic submittal process and providing training for the jurisdictions.

Representatives provided comments. Staff responded to the comments.

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
May 18, 2022

B. NEW ITEM: Award and Authorize Execution of Agreement No. 585 to Bird Rides, Inc. (Bird) in Response to Request for Proposals No. 22‐02 to Provide a Bike and Scooter (Micromobility) Share Pilot Program in the City of San Ramon with Possible Expansion into the Town of Danville, City of Walnut Creek, and Unincorporated Contra Costa County Areas Along the Iron Horse Trail (IHT) if Approved by the Local Jurisdictions
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 585 with Bird asthe selected vendor for a two‐year Shared Micromobility Pilot Program to operate in the City of San Ramon with possible expansion to the Town of Danville, City of Walnut Creek, and unincorporated Contra Costa County areas along the IHT as determined by the communities and the East Bay Regional Park District, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐ substantive changes to the language.

ACTION: Commissioner Noack moved to authorize the Chair to execute Agreement No. 585 with Bird Rides, Inc. as the selected vendor for a two‐year Shared Micromobility Pilot Program to operate in the City of San Ramon with possible expansion to the Town of Danville, City of Walnut Creek, and unincorporated Contra Costa County areas along the Iron Horse Trail as determined by the communities and the East Bay Regional Park District, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language, seconded by Commissioner Gerringer. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner Hudson, Commissioner White
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Peter Engel, Director, Programs, provided a brief background and overview of the shared micromobility program along the Iron Horse Trail corridor, discussed the vendor selection, location for the pilot program and potential expansion to surrounding cities and the county, and the user fee model with no cost to the public agencies.

Commissioners and Representatives provided comments. Staff and Austin Marshburn, with Bird Rides, responded to the comments.

Commissioner Hudson left at 7:04 PM.

C. NEW ITEM: Approval to Release Proposed One Bay Area Grant Cycle 3 (OBAG 3) Program and Call for Projects
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval for release of the proposed OBAG 3 Program and Call for Projects, and authorization of the nomination of four Technical Coordinating Committee Members and four Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Members to serve on the Application Review Panel.

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
May 18, 2022

ACTION: Commissioner Arnerich moved to authorize staff to release the proposed One Bay Area Grant Cycle 3 Program and Call for Projects meeting the requirements ofthe Metropolitan Transportation Commission with strong advocacy for geographic equity across Contra Costa County as projects are selected, and authorization of the nomination of four Technical Coordinating Committee Members and four Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Members to serve on the Application Review Panel, seconded by Commissioner Alt. McGallian. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Vice Chair Glover, Commissioner Hudson, Commissioner Mitchoff, Commissioner White
Abstain‐None
ACTION: Commissioner Butt moved to authorize staff to release the proposed One Bay Area Grant Cycle 3 Program and Call for Projects, and authorization of the nomination of four Technical Coordinating Committee Members and four Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Members to serve on the Application Review Panel, seconded by Commissioner Gerringer. The motion did not pass.

Noes‐Commissioner Arnerich, Commissioner Alt. McGallian, Commissioner Thorpe Absent‐Vice Chair Glover, Commissioner Hudson, Commissioner White Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: John Hoang, Director, Planning, provided a brief background on One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Cycle 3, discussed the program details, the focus on investment in Priority Development Areas, Equity Priority Communities, and Transit‐Rich Areas, and emphasis on projects that are focused on active transportation and Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) investments. Mr. Hoang discussed the countywide funding allocation, prioritization criteria, regional evaluation criteria, proposed program for Contra Costa County with a focus on Vision Zero and safety elements, the Call for Projects process, and Smart Signals project description, goals, and benefits.

Colin Clarke, Associate Transportation Planner, discussed the active transportation and safety programs and projects, eligibility, programmatic SRTS Non‐Infrastructure projects and outcomes, outline of the Call for Projects, collision patterns in Contra Costa County, and local road safety plans. Mr. Hoang discussed the implementation schedule for OBAG Cycle 3.

Commissioners and Representatives provided comments. Staff responded to the comments.

Commissioner Butt made a motion to adopt staff’s recommendation, seconded by Commissioner Gerringer. The motion did not pass.

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
May 18, 2022

After a brief discussion, and revised staff recommendation from Timothy Haile, Executive Director, a secondary motion was made by Commissioner Arnerich to add strong advocacy for geographic equity across Contra Costa County as projects are being selected. The motion passed unanimously by members present.

Commissioner Glover left at 7:32 PM and Commissioner Mitchoff left at 7:53 PM.

10. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS

11. ASSOCIATED COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Central County (TRANSPAC): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on April 14, 2022 and May 12, 2022 (Attachment and meeting handout if available) B. East County (TRANSPLAN): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on May 12, 2022 (Meeting handout if available)
C. Southwest County (SWAT): Notice of Cancellation for the regular meeting on May 2, 2022
D. West County (WCCTAC): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on April 22, 2022 (Meeting handout if available)

12. AUTHORITY BOARD AND STAFF COMMENTS
A. Chair's Comments and Reports
DISCUSSION: Chair Kelley discussed enhancing public outreach on the Authority’s projects.

B. Commissioners' and Ex‐Officio Representatives’ Comments and Reports on Activities and Meetings
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Noack thanked Timothy Haile, Executive Director, for his presentation to the Pleasant Hill City Council to discuss the Authority’s projects, programs, and vision.

Rep. Powers extended an invitation to Timothy Haile, Executive Director, to provide a presentation to the Crockett Lyons Club. Mr. Haile accepted the invitation.

C. Executive Staff Comments
DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, discussed public outreach opportunities at community events in the local jurisdictions to discuss the Countywide Transportation Plan, and announced the planning of an Authority Board Retreat in the Fall. Mr. Haile also provided an update on the Transit‐Oriented

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
May 18, 2022

Communities Policy Update, which is now focusing on fixed rail transit, and discussed staff’s outreach to local jurisdiction, and a draft letter that is being prepared on the current version of the policy. He also discussed grant opportunities including the MEGA grant and the 680 Forward project, Safe Street and Roadsfor All, potential funding for carbon reduction, electrification, and ferry services, and the discussion with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) on Senate Bill 743 and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Mr. Haile announced that the Innovate 680 project is being considered a model project for VMT mitigation for capacity increasing projects. Lastly, he discussed the Washington D.C. federal advocacy trip planned for June 2022, and the success of the Femineer Club Project Showcase on May 18, 2022.

13. CALENDAR
A. May, June, July, and August 2022
B. Calendar of Upcoming Events

14. ADJOURNMENT to the next regular meeting proposed for June 15, 2022 at 6:00 PM.

DISCUSSION: The meeting was adjourned at 8:11 PM.

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update)

7.3.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: CCTA Executive Summary and Board Minutes - May 18, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) TRANSPAC Committee Meeting Summary Minutes
MEETING DATE: May 12, 2022
MEMBERS PRESENT: Loella Haskew, Walnut Creek (Chair); Peter Cloven, Clayton (Vice Chair); Sue Noack, Pleasant Hill; Tim
McGallian, Concord; Mark Ross, Martinez; Karen
Mitchoff, Contra Costa County
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bob Pickett, Concord; John Mercurio, Concord; Diana Vavrek, Pleasant Hill
STAFF PRESENT: Andy Smith, Walnut Creek; Saravana Suthanthira, Concord; John Cunningham, Contra Costa County;
Philip Ho, Pleasant Hill; Melody Reebs, County
Connection; Matt Todd, TRANSPAC Managing
Director; and Tiffany Gephart, TRANSPAC Clerk
GUESTS/PRESENTERS: Matt Kelly, CCTA; Ryan McClain, Fehr & Peers; Jeff Matheson, Golden Rain Foundation/Rossmoor;
Tara Cantu, Choice in Aging; Debbie Toth, Choice
in Aging; Elaine Welch, Mobility Matters
MINUTES PREPARED BY: Tiffany Gephart

1. Convene Regular Meeting / Pledge of Allegiance / Self-Introductions Chair Haskew called the meeting to order at 9:00 A.M. Introductions followed.

2. Report on Open Session
Chair Haskew noted that items discussed in closed session included the Executive Director evaluation and work plan and that no actions were taken.

3. Convene Regular Meeting/Self-Introductions

4. Public Comments
There were no comments from the public.

5. Consent Agenda
a. Minutes of the April 14, 2022 Meeting

7.3.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: TRANSPAC Committee Minutes - May 12, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) On motion by Commissioner Mitchoff seconded by Commissioner McGallian to approve the minutes by unanimous vote of the members present (Haskew, Cloven, Mitchoff, Noack, Ross, McGallian).

6. DRAFT MONUMENT BOULEVARD I-680 BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT

FEASIBILITY STUDY
Matt Todd introduced the item and discussed the background of the Monument corridor project and past Board actions. Supervisor Noack commented that she is happy with the outcome of the study.

On motion by Commissioner Noack seconded by Commissioner Cloven to approve the Draft Monument Boulevard /I-680 Bicycle Pedestrian Improvements Feasibility Study by unanimous vote of the members present (Haskew, Cloven, Mitchoff, Noack, Ross, McGallian).

7. DRAFT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023
Mr. Todd provided an overview of the workplan for FY 2022/2023. Commissioner Noack commented on the school item on the work plan. She noted that the five Mayors impacted by MDUSD met along with school officials and have made some progress. Commissioner Noack further commented that she has worked alongside Commissioner McGallian and would like to continue the conversations. Commissioner Noack further noted that The Secretary of Transportation has requested additional information based on her discussions and that she introduced the CCCTA Assistant GM, Bill Churchill, and CCTA Director, Tim Haile to the MDUSD Superintendent and their head of Transportation.

Commissioner McGallian asked about Innovate 680 and if that should be included in the workplan since the committee is involved. Mr. Todd commented that it is a good idea.

Commissioner Ross agreed that Innovate 680 is very important and should be included in the workplan.

Commissioner Ross raised the topic regarding the paving consortium between the city of Martinez and Clayton and noted better staff coordination is needed. Commissioner Ross further noted a need to increase multi-family charging stations as more secondary electric vehicles come available on the market and charging stations demand increaes, he noted equity concerns as there may be limited access in certain communities potentially.

Commissioner Noack commented that discussion needs to happen around how transportation will handle the addition of homes in Central County in response to increased housing requirements and how to help the cities address the questions.

Mr. Todd provided an overview of the budget for FY 2022/2023.

There were no comments from the Board on the draft budget.

7.3.b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: TRANSPAC Committee Minutes - May 12, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Mr. Todd noted that he would update the workplan with additional comments and carry the item forward to the next TAC and Board meetings for further review and final approval in June.

8. MEASURE J LINE 20A FUNDS PROGRAM - FY 2022-2023 DRAFT PROGRAM.

Mr. Todd provided an overview of the Line 20a program applicant information and draft fund program recommendations summarized in the Agenda Packet.

Commissioner Mitchoff commented that she would like to hear public comments prior to Board comment.

Commissioner Noack clarified if the Board should consider adding additional Measure J revenue based on the adjusted fund estimate in addition to the contingency amount of $116,000. Mr.

Todd commented that increased revenue (from Measure J and Line 20a cost savings) is not included in the fund estimate. Mr. Todd asked if the Board would like to use $116,000 of reserve now that there is increased funding from Measure J.

Jeff Matheson thanked the Board for ongoing support of their program. Mr. Matheson commented on the funding recommendation and noted that difference of 12% funding (65% vs 77%) based on service to Equity Priority Communities. Mr. Matheson noted that there are many other factors that can be used to compare the service such as history of providing the service, the number of rides estimated to be provided, the number of unique individuals served, matching funding provided by the agency, percentage of funds going towards administration or overhead, cost per service hour and per ride, purpose of the ride and the impact of County Connection and LINK. He noted that the TAC focused on one sole factor, Equity Priority, and expressed concern that service to Equity Priority Communities is undefined.

He asked what criteria is used to determine if a program services an equity priority community.

Mr. Matheson asked that the Board consider other criteria and requested further consideration of the formula.

Commissioner Haskew and Mr. Matheson noted that there is diversity within the Rossmoor community from many standpoints including income, racial diversity, etc.

Debbie Toth thanked the Board and staff for all their efforts on the program. Ms. Toth noted her involvement in the creation of the sales tax and specifically the language that definesthe Line 20a program and noted that the language was crafted to support the people above and beyond ADA with door through door service. Ms. Toth noted that one of the criteria for selection is whether or not the program is ongoing. Ms. Toth noted that equity is not the only criteria to be considered and noted that the criteria should not be upheld at the expense of long-standing programs. Ms. Toth further commented that her program did not receive the expected amount of 5310 funding this year and commented that a reduction would cause the program to cease service. For these reasons, Ms. Toth requested that her program be fully funded.

7.3.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: TRANSPAC Committee Minutes - May 12, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Elaine Welch agreed with Ms. Toth’s comments and noted her concern for ongoing programs losing funding. Ms. Welch noted that the intent of Line 20a was not to reduce programs that were successful and necessary at the expense of new programs.

Commissioner Mitchoff expressed concern about funding new programs if existing programs cannot continue to provide services. Commissioner Mitchoff further asked how the programs are funded based on local match. Commissioner Mitchoff noted that some agencies have larger or smaller budgets and would like to see the percentage of the grant and overall budget. Mr.

Todd referenced the local match data included in the packet. Mr. Todd further noted that that staff can more explicitly call-out that information.

Commissioner Mitchoff asked if the material in the packet includes how long programs have been funded by Line 20a. Mr. Todd noted that it does not and commented on his knowledge of each programs funding history. Commissioner Mitchoff requested that staff return with the revised budget with the reserve amount added and data on the length of participation in the Line 20a program, percentage of funding compared to overall budget and local match, and demographics on the Rossmoor population.

Commissioner McGallian commented that there is a duplication of efforts and in some cases agencies are serving the same population. Commissioner McGallian commented that he would be happy to see the GoGo Concord Senior Transportation Program rolled into another program if it is meeting the need and provided additional comments about agencies combining efforts in general. Commissioner McGallian expressed concern about tapping into the TRANSPAC reserves.

Mr. Cunningham commented that he was helping to lead the implementation of the Active Transportation Strategic Plan (ATSP). Mr. Cunningham affirmed Commissioner McGallian’s comment on coordination per the ATSP and noted that this is the way of the future.

Ms. Welch commented that Mobility Matters is the only non-profit volunteer driver program that covers all of Contra Costa County. Ms. Welch agreed that she would want to coordinate with other agencies that enter the network. She reaffirmed that there is still a concern about removing funding from existing programs that are unique.

Ms. Toth commented that Choice in Aging has made extensive effort to coordinate including participation on the Senior Mobility Action Council, ATSP, Measure X, and annual meetings with other agencies to coordinate services ahead of 5310 applications for example. Ms. Toth further commented that priority needs to be considered for existing programs, and the funding should be for small, local agencies and non-profits that provide services for seniors and people with disabilities. Ms. Toth also commented that she has advocated with Caltrans to divert funding into senior and disabled transportation, but it will not happen overnight.

7.3.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: TRANSPAC Committee Minutes - May 12, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update) Commissioner Noack asked that the Board look more closely at the length of funding and other factors as opposed to a cut across the board. Commissioner Ross agreed with comments from Commissioner Noack that the Board needs to look at the programs more extensively such as the communities being served and to define Equity Priority Communities.

Commissioner Haskew asked if legally the Board needs to approve the fund program in June and options if additional time is needed. Mr. Todd commented that the fund program does not have to be approved in June, but it is helpful to do so in that it provides budget certainty for the applicants.

Commissioner Noack asked the Board to decide on whether to add the reserve funding to the Line 20a program budget.

On a motion by Commissioner Noack, seconded by commissioner Mitchoff to add $116,000 in reserve funding to the Measure J Line 20a program for FY 2022/2023 and FY 2023/2024, and to direct TRANSPAC staff and TAC to bring back revised allocation scenarios to the June Board meeting by unanimous vote of the members present (Haskew, Cloven, Mitchoff, Noack, Ross, McGallian).

10. TRANSPAC CCTA REPRESENTATIVE REPORTS.

Chair Haskew commented that the CCTA Planning Committee meeting was canceled.

Commissioner Noack commented that the APC meeting consisted of an in-depth legislative update which included the possibility of a Mega federal grant that CCTA could apply for. There was an approval of funds for a transit signal priority coordination system for Concord and Walnut Creek.

11. TAC ORAL REPORTS BY JURISDICTION
No member comments.

12. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS
No member comments.

13. MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT
No comments.

14. ADJOURN / NEXT MEETING The meeting adjourned at 10:47 A.M. The next meeting is scheduled for June 9, 2022 at 9:00 A.M.

7.3.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: TRANSPAC Committee Minutes - May 12, 2022 (TRANSPAC Update)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: REAFFIRM RESOLUTION NO. 33-22 APPROVING CONTINUED

TELECONFERENCED, HYBRID OR IN-PERSON MEETINGS OF ALL

CITY LEGISLATIVE BODIES PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
AB 361

SYNOPSIS
On September 15, 2021, the Governor signed into law AB 361, an urgency measure which allows for the continuation of teleconferenced meetings without complying with the teleconferencing requirements imposed by the Brown Act. The measure requires that the findings allowing for teleconferenced meetings are affirmed every 30 days. On June 27, 2022, the City Council reaffirmed Resolution No. 33-22 (adopted May 2, 2022) allowing for teleconferenced, in-person, or hybrid (a blend of remote and in-person participants) public meetings of the City’s legislative bodies. Staff recommends the City Council reaffirm the resolution for the next 30-day period.

DISCUSSION
Background
AB 361 temporarily authorizes local agencies to hold teleconferenced meetings without complying with the teleconferencing requirements imposed by the Brown Act when the legislative body of the local agency holds a meeting: 1) during a declared state of emergency, when state or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; 2) during a proclaimed state of emergency held for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; and 3) during a proclaimed state of emergency when the legislative body has determined that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. The City Council has been utilizing AB 361 to hold teleconferenced meetings since October 2021 for the City Council and all subsidiary City commissions, boards, and committees.

On May 2, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 33-22 allowing for in-person, hybrid, or fully teleconferenced meetings of all legislative bodies pursuant to the provisions of AB 361.

The City Council reaffirmed that resolution on May 16th, at both June meetings, and again on July 11, 2022.

7.4 Packet Pg. 66
Analysis
In order to continue teleconferenced or hybrid meetings, the Council must reconsider the factors above every 30 days, and adopt specified findings that the facts relied upon still exist.

The State of California is still under an emergency declaration regarding COVID-19, and as of the publishing of the agenda packet that contains this report, both State and local health officials continue to recommend holding online meetings, or if meeting in person, social distancing1, to help stop the spread of the virus. Contra Costa Health Services updated its Recommendations for Safely Holding Public Meetings on July 5, 2022 (attached).

The State of California emergency declaration regarding COVID-19 remains in effect, and both State and local health officials continue to encourage online public meetings as online meetings present the lowest risk of transmission of COVID-19. If meeting in-person, social distancing, to help stop the spread of COVID-19 is recommended.

The July 11th reaffirmation of Resolution No. 33-22 expires on August 10, 2022, which falls before the next City Council meeting (in September). Staff therefore recommends the City Council reaffirm Resolution No. 33-22 allowing for in-person, hybrid, or fully teleconferenced meetings of all City legislative bodies through September 10, 2022 pursuant to the provisions of AB 361.

The City will continue to monitor State and local recommendations and guidelines and update the findings every 30 days, in compliance with AB 361.

FISCAL IMPACT
None

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Reaffirm Resolution No. 33-22 allowing for in-person, hybrid, or fully teleconferenced meetings of all legislative bodies pursuant to the provisions of AB 361.

1 There are still references to social distancing in state materials including: the Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) for Medi-Cal beneficiaries located at https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Pages/COVID-19-Vaccines.aspx updated February 15, 2022; the guidance on additional vaccine doses for persons who are immunocompromised located at https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/COVID-19/ThirdVaccineDoseQandA.aspx updated June 23, 2022; and the FAQ’s to Cal-OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standards located at https://www.dir.ca.gov/dosh/coronavirus/covid19faqs.html#training updated July 18, 2022.

7.4 Packet Pg. 67

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Provide further direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution No. 33-22
Recommendations for Safely Holding Public Meetings (July 5, 2022) Prepared by: Danielle K. Habr, Principal Management Analyst/City Clerk Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.4 Packet Pg. 68
RESOLUTION NO. 33-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

ALLOWING FOR IN-PERSON, HYBRID TELECONFERENCED, OR FULLY

TELECONFERENCED MEETINGS OF ALL LEGISLATIVE BODIES PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF AB 361, AND RESCINDING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION 19-22
WHEREAS, the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code § 54950 et seq.) generally requires local agencies that meet via teleconference, including through other virtual or electronic means such as Zoom, to provide public access at each location in which members of the legislative body are teleconferencing; and WHEREAS, the Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361), which amended Government Code section 54953 to allow local agencies to meet virtually during a proclaimed state of emergency if state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Governor issued a proclamation declaring a state of emergency on March 4, 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, pursuant to section 8625 of the California Emergency Services Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and finds that state or local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires that the City of Pleasant Hill, including all its commissions, committees, and other Brown Act bodies, shall have the option of holding public meetings in-person with social distancing, via hybrid teleconferencing, or via fully teleconferencing, pursuant to AB 361 and Government Code section 54953(e).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill;
Section 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. This Resolution rescinds and replaces Resolution 19-22.

Section 3. The City Council and all other City commissions, committees, or other Brown Act Bodies shall be authorized to meet in person with social distancing, via hybrid teleconferencing or via fully teleconferencing the meeting. A hybrid approach is one in which some persons are permitted to attend in-person, as space permits, and others are permitted to attend virtually. The legislative body shall indicate which type of meeting it is holding by noting at the top of each agenda whether an in-person location is being

7.4.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Resolution No. 33-22 (Teleconferenced, Hybrid or In-person Meetings 8/11/22-9/10/22) made available and if it is, approximately how many members of the public may be accommodated.

Section 4. The City Council shall take action to renew this Resolution every thirty days for as long as any state or local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing, but the City Council may terminate the Resolution at any time.

In the event that more than thirty days pass in between regular City Council meetings for any reason, the City Council shall take action to renew this Resolution prior to taking any action or engaging in any deliberation or discussion at the beginning of the next regular meeting or a special meeting called for such purposes.

Section 5. The City Council hereby finds and determines that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3), because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a “project” pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Section 6. If any provision of this Resolution or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable.

The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Resolution regardless of the invalidity of any particular portion of this Resolution.

Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 2nd day of May, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Carlson, Flaherty, Noack, Rinn, Harris
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk

7.4.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Resolution No. 33-22 (Teleconferenced, Hybrid or In-person Meetings 8/11/22-9/10/22) Recommendations for safely holding public meetings
Each local government agency is authorized to determine whether to hold public meetings in person, on-line (teleconferencing only), or via a combination of methods. The following are recommendations from the Contra Costa County Health Officer to minimize the risk of COVID 19 transmission during a public meeting.

1. Online meetings (i.e. teleconferencing meetings) are encouraged, where practical, as these meetings present the lowest risk of transmission of SARS CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID 19. This is particularly important when community prevalence rates are high. Our current trends as of July 5, 2022 in Covid-19 case rate, test positivity, Covid-19 hospitalizations, and Covid-19 wastewater surveillance are increasing at this time. In addition to this, the predominant variant of Covid-19 being identified continues to be the Omicron variant and it’s subvariants the impact of which on the spread of Covid-19 has shown to dramatically increase COVID-19 transmission.

2. If a local agency determines to hold in-person meetings, offering the public the opportunity to attend via a call-in option or an internet-based service option is recommended, when possible, to give those at higher risk of and/or higher concern about COVID-19 an alternative to participating in person.

3. A written safety protocol should be developed and followed. It is recommended that the protocol require social distancing, where feasible – i.e. six feet of separation between attendees; and consider requiring or strongly encouraging face masking of all attendees and encouraging attendees to be up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccine.

4. Seating arrangements should allow for staff and members of the public to easily maintain at least six-foot distance from one another at all practicable times.

5. Consider holding public meetings outdoors. Increasing scientific consensus is that outdoor airflow reduces the risk of COVID-19 transmission compared to indoor spaces. Hosting events outdoors also may make it easier to space staff and members of the public at least 6 feet apart. If unable to host outdoors, consider ways to increase ventilation and flow of the indoor space to reduce the risk of COVID-19 while indoors.

6. Current evidence is unclear as to the added benefit of temperature checks in addition to symptom checks. We encourage focus on symptom checks as they may screen out individuals with other Covid-19 symptoms besides fever and help reinforce the message to not go out in public if you are not feeling well.

7. Consider a voluntary attendance sheet with names and contact information to assist in contact tracing of any cases linked to a public meeting.

Revised 7-5-2022
Sefanit Mekuria, MD, MPH
Deputy Health Officer, Contra Costa County

7.4.b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Recommendations for Safely Holding Public Meetings (July 5, 2022) (Teleconferenced, Hybrid or In-person Meetings 8/11/22-

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-22 DESIGNATING COUNCILMEMBER

KEN CARLSON AS A VOTING DELEGATE AT THE LEAGUE OF
CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE FROM SEPTEMBER 7-
9 IN LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

SYNOPSIS
The League of California Cities’ Annual Conference is scheduled for September 7-9, 2022 in Long Beach, California. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting scheduled for September 9, 2022 at the conference. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. Consistent with the League’s bylaws, a City’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the City Council in order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting.

DISCUSSION
Background
To vote at the Annual Business Meeting of the League of California Cities on September 9, 2022, each City Council is required to designate a voting delegate. Councilmember Ken Carlson plans to attend this year’s League Conference, and it would be appropriate to designate him as the Voting Delegate.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department.

The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt the proposed resolution.

7.5 Packet Pg. 72

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Choose other Councilmembers to serve as voting delegates, or take no action, and do not have the City participate in voting at the League’s Annual Business Meeting.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Prepared by: Juanita Davalos
Administrative Analyst
Approved by: June Catalano
City Manager

7.5 Packet Pg. 73
RESOLUTION NO. __-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

DESIGNATING COUNCILMEMBER KEN CARLSON AS A VOTING DELEGATE AT

THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE FROM
SEPTEMBER 7-9, 2022 IN LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the League of California Cities Annual Conference will be held September 7-9, 2022, in Long Beach, California; and
WHEREAS, in order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting scheduled for September 9, 2022, the City Council must designate a voting delegate; and
WHEREAS, Councilmember Ken Carlson has indicated that he will be attending the conference; and
WHEREAS, in the event the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity, the City Council may appoint up to two alternate voting delegates.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that Councilmember Ken Carlson is designated as the voting delegate at the 2022 Annual League of California Cities Conference being held September 7-9, 2022.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting of the Council held on the 1st day of August, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________________
MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk

7.5.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Voting Delegate for League Conference)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-22 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO RECORD FINAL MAP AND AUTHORIZE

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
WITH CDP PH HOLDING LLC FOR SUBDIVISION 9520 (401 TAYLOR

BOULEVARD)

SYNOPSIS
The CDP PH Holding LLC has satisfied the tentative map conditions of approval for Subdivision 9520 and is requesting approval of the Final Map. The Final Map proposes to subdivide the property and allow for the development of 31 new single-family homes. A Subdivision Agreement is required from the property owner to construct private and public site improvements deemed necessary for the subdivision. Staff recommends the City Council approve the Final Map, authorize the City Manager to execute a Subdivision Agreement, and authorize the City Engineer to record the Final Map for Subdivision 9520.

DISCUSSION
Background
On August 16, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 57-21, approving a General Plan Amendment, Development Plan, Major Subdivision and Architectural Review Permit (PLN 21- 0028) for the 401 Taylor Boulevard II small-lot, single-family homes project at 401 Taylor Boulevard. The Major Subdivision created 31 new residential parcels, ranging in size from 3,105 to 5,830 square feet, with an average lot size of 3,745 square feet within the 4.86-acre project site and open space. Six of the 31 homes included a secondary dwelling unit.

Analysis
Section 17.30.070 of the City’s Municipal Code and Government Code Section 66442 of the Subdivision Map Act authorize the City Engineer to make the determination that the Final Map is in conformance with the approved Tentative Map and recommend approval to the City Council.

The code sections require approval of a Final Map if all development conditions of the approved Tentative Map are satisfied.

7.6 Packet Pg. 75
The developer has substantially complied with all necessary conditions of approval of the Tentative Map and mitigation measures required by the City Council (Resolution No. 57-21), and is in conformance with applicable Public Works and Community Development standards. All Engineering Division conditions, except for construction of the necessary site improvements, have been met. Under the Subdivision Map Act, execution of a Subdivision Agreement (including improvement bonds) will allow approval of the Final Map prior to construction of site improvements.

The Subdivision Agreement outlines specific requirements and timelines to construct the on-site and off-site improvements necessary to support the development project. For this project, site improvements required include: site grading, drainage improvements, private roadway improvements, on- and off-site utilities, stormwater treatment facilities, and landscaping. The Agreement also guarantees the following:
 Installation and completion of the work and improvements deemed necessary by the City Engineer, as shown on the Grading and Improvement Plans of the Subdivision.  Compliance with City Council Resolution No. 57-21 and City Council Conditions of Approval.
 Submittal of bonds as security that improvements necessary to serve the development will be built in accordance with the approved plans.

The City Surveyor has reviewed the Final Map and determined that it is technically correct, and the City Engineer has reviewed the Final Map and has determined that it is in substantial conformance with the Tentative Map and that all development conditions have been met. The City Engineer, therefore, recommends approval of the Final Map for Subdivision 9520 (401 Taylor Boulevard).

Once the Subdivision Agreement is executed, the Final Map for the Subdivision can be recorded at the County Recorder.

FISCAL IMPACT
The requested action has no direct impacts to the City’s General Fund. Approving the Final Map will allow the City to collect revenue in the form of developer and cost recovery fees (i.e. Traffic Mitigation, Stormwater, permits, etc.). There will be an increase in property tax revenue because of the higher value of the development as compared to the previous land use conditions. The constructed private improvements (street and sidewalks) will be maintained in the future by the abutting property owners or homeowners association.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

7.6 Packet Pg. 76

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Approving the Final Map for Subdivision 9520,

2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Subdivision Agreement with CDP PH Holding LLC,

3. Authorizing approval of the Final Map for Subdivision 9520; and Authorizing the City Engineer to record the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 9520.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
None recommended. The City is required to approve the Final Map once the applicant complies with the terms of the tentative map conditions of approval. Execution of the Subdivision Agreement and bonds ensure that the improvements necessary to serve the development will be built in accordance with the approved plans.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Subdivision Agreement
Vesting Tentative Map
Final Map
Prepared by: Mary Coulson, Consulting Senior Civil Engineer Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.6 Packet Pg. 77
RESOLUTION NO. -22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

TO APPROVE AND RECORD FINAL MAP AND AUTHORIZE THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT WITH CDP PH HOLDING LLC FOR SUBDIVISION 9520 (401 TAYLOR BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, CDP PH Holding LLC proposed to subdivide an existing 4.86-acre site to create a major subdivision with open space and 31 new residential parcels for the development of new single-family homes; and
WHEREAS, on August 16, 2021, by Resolution No. 57-21, the City Council approved Vesting Tentative Map for Subdivision 9520; and
WHEREAS, CDP PH Holding LLC has fulfilled the requirements of the Vesting Tentative Map, including preparation of Improvement Plans, as required prior to recordation of the Final Map for Subdivision 9520; and
WHEREAS, CDP PH Holding LLC is required to enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the City of Pleasant Hill and provide improvement bonds to guarantee construction of site improvements related to Subdivision 9520, as approved by the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill:

1. Finds that approval of the Final Map for Subdivision 9520 is a ministerial action and is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15268(b)(3).

2. Approves the Subdivision Agreement between CDP PH Holding LLC and the City of Pleasant Hill for Subdivision 9520, and authorizes the City Manager to sign on the City’s behalf.

3. Finds that CDP PH Holding LLC has substantially complied with all necessary mitigation measures and Conditions of Approval for the Vesting Tentative Map as required prior to recordation of the Final Map for Subdivision 9520, and therefore approves the Final Map for Subdivision 9520.

4. Authorizes the City Engineer to record the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 9520.
[Signatures on the Following Page]

7.6.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting of the Council held on the 1st day of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk

7.6.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

7.6.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Subdivision Agreement (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
..

El!lffl«;/8YQT>EIIS ~
'®------• C)
111D
• ---------- P52J.5
* .--*
80t.N)AR'(UE

RIGHTMWAY
STORMllfWl,IWIIOI.E
,.,-,c1,,qN.ET
AAEA..,_
FIELDN.ET
WATERLIENfOV"LVD
SANITIIAYSEVERAHI>~

JOINTTRENCH
PAACEl.1.M.1.0TI.Hi
PM>GRAIJE
EU!CTROUSt

VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 9520
401 TAYLOR BL VD

PLEASANT HILL, CALIFORNIA
JULY 2021
.--"-""-,,'7'""
JltfTAny& MAP NOTU
1, 0WiEA:

2.N>fll.lC/INT:

PLBASANT HIU., CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA
~
·SITEO ' ~ 'I_ ,.. ' ' ; l
ytCINl;YMAP
NOATHERN C.ol.lR>RNA CONFERENQi ASSOCIATION OF n,E 61!1/ENTH OAY

ADVENTIST, A COAPORATION
I-! !'--l
""'=
--,
!:~ l.fUS8 Oll£RYOSE
EAltlHSWM.E
LOTHUl&R
CATAL V8T llE\IEI.OPIIENT PARTNERS. U.C
m HARTZ WAY. SIATE 200
O""'\IILLE, CA 9WII CONTACT: BRUCE ltfEJIS
(82$)383-8045 .·. ·;,·~ --==~=-=.,------: . ~:==.:. _: T~YLO: :~~~. ==-=-=:--__:::-~=-~ _ ,.,, • -:
• _ _,_~ rf ~:;.,:;.:.-::....;..;;.:..:.:::..-::..,:.:-;_:.~\l, •-~ •-,,-'.£..'•·-.i'I .: , ENGINEERl!'I.MNER MACKAY&SCMPSCMLENCINEBIS J , \ I • ' "- 5142FftMIQJN01tl\lE,SUnEB
• • PAACEL C \ • 11 I PI.EASANlON, C/1 oou ~ , ' : CONT~T:KIMREEUCHRISGUEN~ER tJjj
~ L· ~~ ® l·.X 111EE TOBEN!IIOIEO

ABBREVIATIONS
~ RIIOY
llW c"""' Cl.

OIW
YRIHl
£ 811T
t (I
fVM.
l'IC
08 , ..
..

IP
IJS
-
PA.

A~GATE8'SE P
-TCONCAET£ Pl'E
-
BOtT'OMOFWM.1. P\11! PS&
CO~COSTAWATEPDISf.PICT R/W
CEN'llilUE 80 -· fAST8"'YIUICIPM. l111.ITYlll8TfOCT -
9G
EASIM:NT 88
EXISTING au:a••o S&li BERGENCYVEHIO.E ACCe88 eABEIENT f;TF£ FM:E CJ:" CURB SW
(Jl,c)E-..,C swo tM>~ll(JIII tc
HKlHPOWT' TFC
I.OWPOINT 1RC -e TW ==T~TH199U80MSIJN :..e

INDEX OF TENTATIVE MAP SHEETS SHEET DESCRIPTION
F"Pl"'S
,.
1 ..
~
..
1 <:0111,A !lltl:T, N<ll(lj, 6Hl'ET tlllfil( • I.ICNTY .... fJtlsTINO (:f'JfO IIOIG
Dl;'WI.JllOMPlJ!HA T'Rf'F nlfll09TIONAAN
1>:NTA1Ml-
~STAI.I.DR PIIOELl;VAtlON
~TE ACCE88E,16611EHT
AJBUC unurv EIIIIEMIHT
PUlluC 90Ew-,( l-te!T _,,-OFWI<'/
&TeltMDRMt
stCRMllfWIEIIIIEtelT
8W3AAl>EEl.£\/Al!ON

BMTARY SEWER
SNITARY SEIWtR ,..._NT
~MlREAllENTF/lttCUTYEMQIENT
SUWAU<
STCJIM WA.TERQUMJlY
TOPOF~B
roP OFFUJSM CUIII TOPOFROI.LliOCUIII

TOPOFWAU
V..TERltlE-STIC)
V\11\lERUNE l!AlllllElff
t
~ • ' -<I , '---,----,----,---~--, - - - - J ,, : : : I ~1 (1125)226- , "f}. ~ I • • , 4 GEOT1!CllttCAI.CONSU\.T""'1S: ENGEO
\ ', ~-0 ~ . 1 • 1, I ,I ,_ • 'r 2010CAOWCANYONPI.M:E.IIUITE250 1 \ 1 _. ,<!4 ' ' ,.1 . '·-::7 i'; •1 , , \ / SANRAMON,C/1,94513
' \. · : . ... .... ~ l 6 ' 5 . , i ' !· ' j l CONTACT:SROOKSAAMSOEU. 1' \ ~ 1--· •'1· _ _ ). '1" ' ,; ~ . · (925)-1864000
''\ , \." ', ··· ~ ~:!;:;:;==::::;:::;:;;;!;=!:;:;;:::;:::;=;:::::;;;::;::::;;;;:===,;:;!:,.../ ! < _:s_ ,J •. AREASU8JECT101NUNOATION:AREAOFIIIN-VL.C><l01!AZNID,ZONEX.PEIIFIIWOI013CG219F I .·· ,., i)•I 1;! -~l
L2, .\ .. . ...-P· v=i=F,=,:===;~~~::::;:::::f:;::=;;==::..... 'n' ii~ 1· i 8, SUBDIVlllEOMEA: UlllACRES \ • ·• \ '~----. ' ' ; :t,., i 7 . AS$£SSOASPARt'&LNUMIER: 1IMt50--0$7,15$-0S0-050 t .. - · ·1 I;· .t..• {. \ .,, ·0- -~---P . ' ~===!=j{•,. ;.: . ~ ; )~ 8. FIRE PIIOTECTION: CONlRACOSTA.COUNTY FIRE PIIOTiCTION DISTIIICT 1 •~1_ •_._i ~ ii
• ii
• L;&
~ :i~
I~-ff
~"l, ". \~ ,__ ____ .., if' J ., SNflTA~DISTRtCTSTAN>AROS. _ '!),\~, '. .\ 13 . ·· ) ;i i~ O,SEWERSYSTUI: TOB&IN$TALLEOIN00NFOAMI\NCEWITHCENTIIALCON1RACOSTA i,\~---_J... -u---- - '---r'-- -'----1 l ', 1'; i \ 10. W11ERSYSTEM, Tolll1NSTALLED1N00NFC1111W1CEW1THcONTRAoosrAW111!A01SmicT !i r~
M i;
t,J\ ,. ~ \i .- • ' f- 1 STMIOAAD6,
' \ '.-·I/ ·:·_ ,•· .. 1 ~'JJ ,J 11. IJIAINNlE: TOBEINSTALLEDINOONFOAM..,,CEIMTHCITYOFPI.EA!II\NTHU. ifi~ l. \ l > ·\ "16 '. , Ii ,: 1 : . STANDARDS, ,(~ t'/£~ ~ \_
\ • \ .. ..-- _ ".•·_ ~==J;:-;;;;;,;;;;;r~~"" : : 1 :J- 1 1 l~ 12. OAS & EI.EC!RICITY. TO !IE INSTALLEO IN OONFOIIMIIHCE WITH STANOAROS OF PAOf'IC GAS ANo,{f/ 8 ~ /~ § \, ~• , __ ). Et.tC'TIIICOO =w :;, ~-~ i
' .' ' :·· .\• .... ,•6 \ _ ·_· • ~:::::,,,-c:::!~~~;;~4~f;t =;;~ 1 / I ~-::;. ·=13, TEU!l'liONE TO BE INSTALLED IN CONFCIIIMI\NCE WITH STAICIAR0$ OF AT&T ~:S.~o ,I! f}/ ~ \
'1 ::,..-.:· • 'I ~ :ll!o,:, .._~ •
\ 1 ......-__ _ . .__ ; i ' ◄ <:ABU!: TO 8& INSTALLEO IN OONFCIIIMANCE WITH STANDARDS OF COMCAST ~]Ji t ~ , ' •· : •
17 ~, 16 S'mEETIMPAOl/£MENTS ALLSTil!ETSANOAll.E'tSTOBEPIIIVATE. ~ I \ I I 1' ~ • ), \ _ _..:: ; t'.' I.( 1$ EXl8TING&PIIOl'OSE020NING:PAOFE.S$0NAI.ANOAOIIINiSTRATIVEOFFICEIPIANNEOUNITOIIIEI.OPl!£NT ! ~ \ .· . : I: ,J, :. .. 11.EXISTINQIPIIOl'OSEOIANOUSE:OFFICEl31UNITSINGLe-l'AIIILYAESl{lENTIAI. . ll
,o.
$ffl;Dl-NfPUN
,stf!TRUCKliC,a•MPIM
PRU.NWAFffGRAIJl!Nr,Pllft
._......,,."'1UTYPUH
""9.NINMYS«-IERC<ltllROI.PUN
PRN.UIWn' fJtOaof C0NTR0t Pl.AN
Q 2~ so 100\. \
". ~ l • :;; .....__ .... 18.BASISOF£l.&VAflONS· 8ENCHMl!ftK.:Tt11£1.EVATIONSSHO'IIVNH&R&ONA"68ASEOONTI1ENORTI1 ~
• j ~• · ,: ~~=~~~~~~~~~~:e~::i=~~:t::",.,,~:~~:-,:~::itu:;;~ , , NO. 10003, SET IN THE ASf'HAL T PARKING LOT AT THE ENO OF THE PAIIKl!G STRPE NEAREST 10 TH£ 1~ ~gr; AffCHll(CTUKt'PIIH§
llllt
S!l2
.. ,
....

11.1 M
A5
..

Al
..

A!I
A.,
"" AO
.. ..,
A ..
°'' 00,
COil
00\llRAHU;T
91RE.ET9COl!U>18fll
Sl'RFHSartatJOtarr2
Pl.NI 1 Fl.OQR Pl ANS
PIAN 1 ROUf PIAMI
PINH>R<JNTHt llATION!I
PlMtf~JUW-.~
PlM I ~ 'TBIWU:lE\IAJ10HS
PIAH2 rl.(Xll>PI.ANS
PLON2 R<lOFIUH8 Pl>H2 HKlHT 111 VII TIONS
Pl,OIU>'-1,tI.l#lllONS
PWIZ tlW'TIIMAHHtVAhOOOI
Pl,Nf.lfl O'JRPl,Ndl
l'l-"" 3 1\00RPI.ANS PlAH3RCnt RAHS
PIAH3FRONTEUM.TIONS
PIAH3 FAAMIDIISE ElEIIATIONIJ
PIAH3-ELEVATIOIG
UGHnNGFlXT\IREll
BIT£IIOICOI.OR I ... Tm!AIB
EllTEA<RCOI.OR&IIATEPIAUI
II
~
u
UI
" '-'
..
u
,,..

PRS.NINMYI.NfflCIPE8ffEPI.AN
FRONT YARD TYl'ICM. WIISC/IPE PLANS
PRBMINMYLANDSCIPE 8m!:0ET,'1lB
BIFF£RPUN'l9IO· TA'll.OR80l.t.EVARO PRa.NNARYIIYOflOZQNEOWl&-aAn<lNCAI..Cl.l.A1lONS fENCINORAN
PHOTO.ETAICPl.#I
SCAl£, 1"- IIO' ----~--=-~--~.,.~----=•~---s.~~~~T-~1 , l eua.01NGS NOR™ ENTRANCE.AND HAVING~ ELEVAnON OF 101.0Y • • • ';'"' ", • h,{X ~-, '- • • ~-., / • ',f ' It. UNLESSOTHEJIWSESPECFICAll.YSTAT£0tllHECON0ffiONSOFAl'PRO\IAL,LOCAL"8ENCYN>PRO\IAL Of lHIS MAP SHAil. CON6TIIUTE AN EXPRESS l'lll01NG Tl1AT THE Plla>oSEO D\IISION ""'O DEVELOPMENT Of l)IE SUBJ!,CTPAOPERTY WU HOT UNREASONABI.EINTERfUI! ""™ THE fllEE ""'OCOIIPI.ETI; EXERCISE Of RIGHTSDESCf'IBE!) IN GOVERNMENT CODE SEC110N eeoe(,',)(a)W(Q .

20. UTILITY SIZES ANOLOC/1110N, SlREETGRAOES, ANDLOTONENSIONS ME PIIELMIW.RYANO SUBJECT TO ANAL ENGINEERING Dl,SIQN ""'OHOUSE PI.OT11NG.

21. AU. SEWER ANOPOTABI.E Wi'ITER WINS ME r UNLESS N0f£0. ALL PUBUC STORM CIRAINS ME II" ~NI. ORASNOTEtJ.

22. AU. EX1STING EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON SHEET 2.

23. PAOPOSEO STREET N,t,MES ""DAI. TiANA11VE8 IN OROEII OF OUIREI> USE: 1. TOBE IETERMINa>. a4. APl'UCANT IIESEA\IES THE RIGttT TO fl LE MULTIPI.EIPHASEO FINAL MAPS TO SUBDIVIDE THE PlloPERTY, N COMPIJ..,,CE WTH THiS VESTING TENTATI\IE IMP.

Flt£ D£PARl'MENTNO'IU.

1. PROPOSED PIII\IATE ~y Will. BE A FIIIE 1.ANE. PARKING IS ONLY All.Ol'lel IN 0£SIGW.TEDPAltllNO AREAS. SEE SIIEET • RlR LOCAnON OF Pl\lll<INCI STAI.LS. PAOPER SIGIIAGE ""'D SlRIPING WIU. 81! PART OF THEPAOJECTIM'AOVEMENTPI.ANS.

2. A Fl!IE SPIIINl<I.EA SYSTEM MEETING NFPA 130 WI.LBE RECIUIRl!O FOR ALLRl!SDENTIAL HOMES REOARDU:SS OF SIZE BEGINNING JANUARY I, 2011 .

PROIIIDEOBY
~
:

DATED:

ENTl'R.EO:

NIOJECHt
ENGl!O IN(;ORPO!lATED
JANUARY '12, l!0!9
GEOTECIO"C"4. EXPLORATION 15811.000..000
<I!!!
>ti
w ..... ....lj>e
5t;!li
ID!lii
a::1111
~H! m­ ~1t1
,- ii~, O:a-a:!:.
...,. ~
B'il
~
-~- EC.T . .._.--.
19963
,'f 10

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
•
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
t',•ll•-2'\~ ~ [4((9 F'!fp I IWG.' \Pl.li iiiii\tt,i- di-E.: ~;ff.".r..~ \

TAYLOR BLVU
(PU~L!~)
~
~EXJlllNOIWSMCIUSMU.f
~ msmc, mUC'TURE& • a.Ha SF
1::::::::::::::1 Elllfl .. PEIIVlllJS ...... • 120, 1!5 SF • • • ,1 / / . ' / , RELINllflStliWNT Of MUT1'Efl8 RlOKT'S -••--LINE
1 T
30 60 SCAL£: 1•=30'
t~~~ q: 1 ij ~ l
• .. ,i
?t
d'
~ b-'::, - ~;:r 1
92i
·; ;,
~n fde "' ·~
I
~
I
,;
J I
~I
~i
>i
=> ~--. ig Ot; ..
m!I
a:~-
0 !ii! .J !i!!
,tt
~I -~ o!: 'le
• ~I ;En 19 963
2 •f \0

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
,.J 7 ··-· ..,.---.._ .. .. __ ,,.,,,., - \,; - _,_,' ;_ -_,., ' -~--- - .· -- ... ..... 7- ,../-.. .. : ·- -- . ,.,,.:('. ~ -~~-0--~~~. ---o .., ,..,...~'-----'....o-- \ ·◊ ~ --""'<>-~...L~~~I- , --o . -",~-·--<>1-: .• ' . ,,__ / TAY;9B.J!.LJD ,,,,._ _ . _ .. ." _ , 'f \ ,,._
/ / --~--~(~~=~~~~~~5c~~-~-~\~~~~~~i;=:-\_---~ _ -- --+~-=~c:--~-$::~:~:;:--:i,,,, ,:·' t:: . ,~ '( .' ,> • ~~~~~-- ..-<:'~'\,,,._ "?;,(, -=~~ -: - ~i ' ' - ~(~'1·- . ~ '/ • \ • ~ \· ,., · .-.-~ :::: ~~~~~;-~~-~~~~j~ilT%f:=;~:n-~ -~~~~~~~~ ;&'~- - ~/ .l!Nd-?'.;?//.:/;.;/4)~;/-,f-;r;~;ifiJi,-. J<t----\,,~~·-~ -=,:.c--"1TI -,,. --;,,\_· ~t/_:_- __ =--~~-- - _0_-~_: ... - __ -.. ---:_- -- -~-~;;~-s?~~i~.:::-;~:«sQ~·-y-::<:·_--.r_.1t:.,·f.,_- , ' . ;· ~\ ,, ,, ·,,;-:: .~\ t . 0 0 if- .:·· -- /j('/.1 ~~-? O 0·· _ .. ·-- ~ - ~m-i ,, - ..c_.~--:.:_:,_""'~~~ .- -::..)ii\ : ,•.;, , : I , · ·--- o · ( . ..o-... -.~ . •. ; .... , - · r'~~---·· '.,.,,.~ "o0 ·0 09 · 0 o- _:>_J-_1 _-;.- : ·:~ \,",, ,_ 1- · t~,~ \
\
\
\
\
0 \ \ a~/~ -\- --. _,.,., , , ,J,.c,. • ~ P:,, •, · ,. ·- .. ·:-'i::i. ----, -~, ,o•osOC ,,, f ·J • '......, ~ / ~ ~, '~ .ft"' )! 4 ,, .# A~ .If ~r ✓ ' \ -- J . -.. ... .., 0: .. , .. ' ' ~ I .. ; - I - Ii ~---.... ~ ' '· \ ' , . . 4) 4'j - ...-_~: . •·'.· .,, .' '. ·,.,-<'.', '. '<"'-~ •~- - :o• ·-,l ;•''. l ii ' ' ,f~ '1\ ' . . , . /',/' , -1"..$ ,,...,~ , , -<l> ,, '-< • •. -'.\ ; 4) " . ,· ,. -\ ~\-: .. ,: I- .. ,, <I> \ ,/,_,~- ,- ' '/, ~'. '/',,-•--- ,- ,' . .' ,d•-J 1,1 ,· ,'~ 1 ' \ ·(,' ' / . /, :-r--:. ,..,,, . !' ""¼..,,..,.,,,.,r\..._ '"' ''.,\ ·-"(•'•\'; 1 -/ \ &! @ ) DIBTllll....,.,. ,,,. · . "/,,~~1~~ . ( ;- ~~~- ~~1''•\,':•l·J 1+-~ 1 ' ) ,.... t ,.,.,...,... , ' , • - .... ' /.. -"~ -~ -~~- • ', ; · ,- :--,,,,;,;,:\ 'r:.,,~i\ '•' I, , ' J • f:{ ~ @ f ''-' • X v ',, II' ·, - '.._ • • ,_,, • r; ~~~--- :• /; , • •,,\',,,''. '•,' ll ;· • ' · • l ; ,. ~ .. fllS'TlNG 81llUC1'IIW. ' ', , ~ ~ ~ <_ .,, .. - - . -. . - ~ .. t:- ,,, ... .. A ,... , ~ ~ ~' ' ' ./i' <I> · ./ """.""', '< ~ ... , ' ~ ' ·;,,-"' ,•~ ,,-~;,;;;;. • , , ,, ~.l; l:1 , ,I, , t \ I·:: I-\ ~-_('<1 ._ \ \_~ $" .: ' ' -- . ~~ --,;~ '@ ... :~~~, , ..,2''< {.•1/,l•)j'·,I I ~ ' I , • ' :\ 4) ,.., 'I . ·-®'' ' ~\ ..,,i:~ I I ..

CONTRA.COSTA\ / \ · .. · ~ i \ .. 1_';: . .. .:.fr -®---·<-t:. ®-~: ~:zi, .. ',.-~ j\11:'1.",·-- 1 • ·}. i
CANAL '.- f · '· \ ' · p.r',f,_, • · '·· , , ·'~ -. \ ~• 1 1 \ 1~,, rl ,
(',;'\ V11mlll6CG11CRm\ ''.,, ',,,.-r', 0,'. ,.~ \..,,, '\'a:.\'':,~~ ·.\~- q\f,f'il: -~' ( , , \,' ,, • TO BE _,,m · ' ·c._.,.,,,, '. '-1(\ . ~ • 1 _,~ \ \ l!)JIY,-:1:i:.,": '-
' '\\. \$ j ' - ', "t-\ \,.:., ,\:,-1,(.,'~ ~ '\.\;" t,l , ,IN~RE~ I \ • I J - I •• ,a7' \ 'l' ~,, ~ ~ '. • I EXJfflflG I { \·'K•, r1 -~'; ,' \., \~i·•DTRE£10BE ,x..,.r - :)i 'DIIIVBll',YTO, ( i' ,\ '-, _,._ \~' ~- · \ J IREIIOYm,cni;,, • , ~ ·, ,,: ·-' I / ,1, ~~ ·• _,r "°l ',~ , , , ,\.1.lti. / ', J· l,f'• I 3;· '\Ll~_,J \, • , I , I~ / 1 1 ' f I O
' \ \ \ ,-·- 'l ) • & \ , " , I , , ~EU>,._., Y, ,J ! ' '-1. r,al' : ' \ ' ,, ) ·'W . ' ~ \ l j I, T01£REIIO'la> ',. , ...l 1 1 .•','. i' , ', ,, ·, ; ,/••·y•..J;-,, ('!. •' ~':j 1 i i ...l j' :',"·\ \~ { , , , ,,,• ; '-· I y ,' ',' ",~! ' -,,, _;:~'tf~,: i•g '•_,.\ . \' ,. \ ' ~ - , ,, . i '\i~,V, I ' /H , : 1),,1 f. ...l -, ,, , '\\•,
1 ,,~- , ( ·mm..,-,, '- 1 •• '---',,....,'\(, A~. '{ ,' :,, :=- '• '', ~ ,1'''. '1\\~t . ' --·•:1 L•, ~ :' lDBERBM11 (/~il."t•• .. ,t _<3,::,t~•,i;'il- :~- ,,,,,,\ \'I'\~ ' •, '~' ".'<>, , , . , \ , ,, , <I> " :, '"tf 0>1Y' ': ,: i\ 1 ,\ .J .•,' ', \ ' '\ L'' , 4) .' V/H·;_• 1 .. _.} •;', , ., -D~ -•. t, I··,,, :~t,.) ~' 'I ' \ I 'ti I.' , -,, r·...,.,$--......,,._, . -'7:'~-''@ '·. 1v,t, '', .:d\. ·.' _T __ ,1. •• · ➔·- •\•,, ·f q '\$\' ' . ).) ' ., '.,', / {~ ®t "/ . ·:;..$/ I .,, ~-" •• Qi) ' I -_:{1'-"1, '•,\-,"\c, ti' , ,4),s,.\ 1 • \,'' • : .. ~:"it,' . t· ·_- . ·;·-__ .:~. ~ I- ·, .·, 1, ,•,', . •,:!)!--. f);~ ,}L__ \ ····- '.1.1 -~ ,,1\~K EllfflllG,_ ;/ . ' • ' - . J ._ ,.•;;,,....-. :"-,.. ,\ / ' 1 /' , : \,-/f _ .,. ' T· - I ,' I.,'\\ ~T0BE- "\ ' ' ' ' " ', :;;.[_. -:,:.,-. ,, 't, •' 'j~ ' h-.J il,.i_;;.JJ ' ..,.Jl~-.r- -- "•-.>. '•\\ , , ·•: ':"" •. 1..,''. i, ,, •'0~ _ v~ :·'-, ; , I 11/,~ j '.Q1 , ..
1 , .-.~• \\',\ \ \ \ \ ~'® { '. " -~ -«1 , '.•. , . ', ' Y/. ·'.; ·; ~ , 1, , {. '1[:l:,,t,, 1.M 'fj•: . \1 •, \ ~ " ; ,:-- , l. ' • , ., .• : • J ,J' , ,', ; , I ,, . ii, ·\· \'-\''~:r::' 7 -~ -- ~ ,~ ,_,_-·" 9-'.,:-.//, d ,.-, ~~: (l'A ·o•·t1 1t .,i, ·/·'.-:)\,,, · .. -:,._>./'' -.,1_, ~-':. .. ·; .' :',\.7."' ~. ,'· . • ,. .- --> , ,·~ .. / t,/ .. '.·.w,,, .r' ;:-,1,r~:J·! 0 ''-\-[•,·,.,,1 1 I ,;·· ,, ':f;~-f,,.B\'~' -, exrsr1tl8u001T0~·\ '", ' 1i.,,,, l ~ 'j'f~O,tt/tf, 1- : ,I ' \ ,,. V • j I ' , ' •l • 'I '' '. ' ' \ ·- .... IIMD (l'll'I l I \ ' ~"--....;..,.-- , , 1, w I )''1 t ' I II ,···:--{\'\ 1 ,, J ·, /\•_,,~·, • ; 1 1..1 \_', ~f-J-:-, . .._· ~,, 1 r'-: .... :--~-/, ~ .,.H/.:fln,0.ti 1:, ' 1 ·_ ··1 • \\ I I' • '\ \ '\>,,,.,_>; '\ • .:f'\ 1 \.--•~ ' · - : ·• ' .0-f ' 1"J1(1t : , : .\ ., ,,.-,' .' I 1 • ,\:, •\; ' 1 ,, ' ~- .,\ -~,\ $...c.Al ,....,:.-,._;.,,...-;.r-::-..,~ _,,i-:=-: . :e- "0: >6,.;, , •;' y, I!, , I ,,,~ •*, • • ( ' ' f, I , • > 1 I' _.L-~~ • , .,....,, ~_, - • _ _, • ,y ,, ,J, j J', ! ..__ ;' •-.\ w Ji'\ ( ~ 1 , 1i1,J,. ,,_~ .·· ,. ~ ,._ -~-®" ---~ ·(:)"'."/~ ._-- ·Q-.·_@ · . . 0 -~ [X.1)' £ASMNT i'r j':, ' •' '\;~;f!f~~~~i~t;£*-i~t~~~¥-5 TuU.: , .. :.\.•; . .,····.\· , );__., .,, - :> _/.._)\ 11· yi .- r~.,_,, _ _ JI.., .,,.r·.1 . { . :/\.> :':"(• ,,,·.__ ., . . :.1 .. ~· · , '·"·."·' , ', •••• • •/, -..'-\.l · ,",.; .,,_... J<..___, ✓ i • , . / \(" .,., (_ l 1 ,~ --- : \,:\,.. I '.\,'' ; / \.._,, ', , ; ,I'«.: ·· t' J \ ~·7 (. ~..-1 . ------.. ! 1""'-.' '·; ':_ \\, ',(- -,j\'~/ '<,) ,;,;_.;,>· \ 1 I : - , /1 .: '
~ I ' , Ir' ,- .J .... \
Lfl!END
-
OtffllllBUllDtflQJOBE
REllO'IED
f .: .:1~.:~j :=: :'1:~wa>
HHi±i±ElH! UI.Sllllll COIICIIETt TO Ill EfEElHEElEl l!Ell!MD 1: ;•-.;;:><8 ~~r.: CURS TO IE IIEIWrffil M1t
®
0 8lil EllST!IIOTUESTOBE. REIIOI/ED
1////✓ ovtRHrAD UNES T0 IE ,_,EIIIIADIIDP
l -1
SC,11£: 1"=30'
.!!O
PROTECTED tREfS (111
IIEIIIMD•21111QOIOII
PRESE'INEO • 13 (24 DMS)
DMJRH8TOIJ,MIIJVID (111
VAl..l..E't'MC.-2
:r~~ri-5
HOUY OU<· 2
9¥ 'fllEQ IP ft ,.PIHIYiP 1111
VM.LEY OM• IO
c:oASTUYE.CMIC•4
i
~ I
~
Q 0 z
~i~ >dB UJ ZE ..Ja.g
::::> :la.
01:i§ mu
a: .. '"
o~·
...Ii!' ~!5
t-1§ -=-1: o!:
• I
~ . '-'f:, .. r -., 19963
.3 ,-~r 10

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ..
•
~~~~~~~.2~ ~~-~-<';AYLOR B~~~~~-~~ - <> -<>~--- t
---~~~~~~E=~~i~,--~1~~:~~~:;:~=-;~:~~~:-~--'•-~~-~=-,-=-'.~:T---~-C~0 ---•-::=--f~'\I' -.. ,. J!: ,,...,....,,...,....,_~ t' "'4'·-~ ',,......... NB9'35'28'W248,99'~DY ','.,0 1·T08f: ,/,.,.--r_,._ -='"""- -- r \,- ·' ~ (. t ~-••,-,-,,?-r.•n·~n!"'.""~..,:-~"'-;".,,,.,.,..,,.~,.~,,,.,:,-,:-1,.~<""rf:: +-;1!io=':n-1--- / •• t. i;I . I ·~' \ \ ' I J I FINAL 1W' i,; \. , \ - PARCEL C 7.. \ \ +,\ \ 1 \ , I I I!,
( 0 .... -IF .,,. :;;,l!S ~ ( ·, .,. 0.1<' ,.I ,I I I Ii \ o '\.., 1 [ :--t~~ ,i, I~ ! '-'- ... •· •· /-"';"~~... \l '. '. , ,, I" \, I I \ .~ W 8 7 6 fe ~ j? - \ \ •i :-l 1 ! ~"' .' • 1 ...... IF IBCrl• Sf :1:1110• IF 5 • • \ 1. •. ' I ' ( • 3 \ • t I , \~ \ ~\ \ -~ 1150sSf 3150t:Sf 32!ttlr \ :~: ! , !
• r.. ~~ , ··::i I:- I r\ 11 \ •·; :~ :, 1 I )
\..,.,__-\,.~ sr.:.~. i i . ill;,;, ..a· -..a:1· ·- "'Ts,•\ \):~ it: ii.

J. 31MltSF ..... 1_..l , \ ., ,.,... ·-21•- ·-·,5r·•· J .. -.5,- -- - u•--- . ·u··· ,-·--- .. ~ 1'1I' I '\ ' \ •~ ~ .. ..,s-v~ ti _ 2,_,.-d If'~.... "; ·j: , 1 ,
CONTRACOSTA~ ~. ~- ~-\,Lt;t,;.,J' -~:~ \_h•~l!J .;, ~, ~ \
\
: .___.---- ,r-"· ~ti,.. ·1·•·1 . i CANAL ~ \ \~ ~ ;,!·~ \' I : I t· . 12 , ~ l:.l ,. l • , I ( ,- ", 3304-t SF "- .----,;;;r-~-----,,,,.---,--=-~.,......-'~-='"---,----,,,,...--- '•J I ·, I 1 ' } \ ~ \r. ' 'f'' 3.L- ___ c45•__ --•L- )t•-'-- 1----•' - -,~: '~-j~--sa• ____ \':n' ::, :<t; ~ "'\,. 28 - 28 i 27 "'' 28 It; --~ •• : \ ', . ! ' ; Li 3 ( ! ) -· 13 -··· - • 3i 05,.. ., ..... i •1 ...... i ~ PRIVATE ..,.;~\ I · 1 Ii 1·-· ~ • PARCEL A 1 pct. I I . I I. ~ 1 ....___ ,a•
_, 30 ... i
N
31 IUOtSf
i 24 «111118F
...... SF STREET A b lj/ \ ' 1
1 I ' :::I I
• ,~ \I : I; I ' ti ! .---,-,,.----7-_..... ,: ! I I \ti.! :3 ~ _.. ,lo 1 ·.· , i' : ! l =J ~i~Jr ~\J • ' "\ 99•39•2t 'E .OD' llffllY
\ \~ ....... ·,t,..)_\- \ '·,. - -1 --~ ·,·1;~ ·1;. ; !-- \ '~. ~~ ~ ,:i- i'ri / \
··"' ~ ' A • 1 : • ,-. • :, -----r
pRIVA'l'E LOOP : ._•.• , , .;1, -f- - ; ,; I fK,i ~~~TED.~ • "' ,-.-..---,,..--· I \ rl ! il .. i ~ r: \ ·t-~ : fif: :.:_li1_ ;: : j ,\\ \ : '•.:~' 1:, \r. 11 · , I I~. ., : I ,· ,..,.., ' '' I 1' '! 1 : I t \ ti !J' ·~ ~ -~~--r~
\ ·. ..,.Jt'rf :~l ! i l t. \ ....____ , ! :, 1
,liii: .
'--. ,:•t~~..,.,.,_·~-=...,.:.._..,,.. )·_-"J119::i_t~i:e~1,:19'· .. w:~.e=i.•,•=·-·-=-,·1 ~~ ----,4·'~i~,#: '; ,..,.,, ~· ;::-....,.--:,;;", c. . ..,.,. · .......... ,__,.,..,......._ ; ,, / \ I I "'.•' ' : ' : I ~ ~. · · '-~/ .. ·,.·• .. -'"'~- ,r/..._ '\. .. /'··· .,.,.. .. '- 1 ,,,,..,,-. . ..__,.., If .,r:"'. '- r 1 \ 1/ , 'i' ··~ , l . .,. " l , ' 'i.J ,_ ( . IP ,
1 I fl I \_\ . \ .. •' ~--. / •' ,, I ', \ \ \ ,../~·;/ ; f'-~ --r------ '(,,f",, I ,, ;iii '\ -~ r < J';;·;< --1 .... ". · ~ , ,., \ .. 1 ! I ·t "t·i:/ •;: '(. "- ...... / .,,, i _J J / / _,..,. ,\ _,., ,/ : r ,---- . 1 T
~
JO 60
SCALE; I "•30'
LOT I AR~SF)
GROSSLOT LOT PROPOSED AREA(SF) COVERAGE LAM>USE
1,648 4.758 0.35 RESIDENTIAL LOT
1,567 4,794 O.ll R[!;IDENTIAl LOT
1,648 J,219 0.51 RGOO<TIAL LOT

1.58] J,150 0.50 RESIDENTIAL LOT
1,646 J,150 0.52 RESlOENTilL LOT

1.567 J,2B0 0.48 RESIDENTIAL LOT
1,646 J.ll02 0.4.3 R£9DEN11AL LOT
1,567 J,806 0.41 AESIDO<TIAl LOT

1.646 4,763 O.JS RESIDENTIAL LOT
1,646 3,748 0.44 RESIOEJfllAL LOT

1.646 3,150 9.52 RESIDENTIAL LOT
1,646 J,J04 0.50 RESIDO<TI•L LOT
I] I 1,646 l.281 0.50 flalDfJ<TIAL LOT
1,848 Ji,150 0.52 RESIDENTIAL LOT
1,646 3,150 0.52 RESIDDnlAL LOT
16 1,6-46 l,349 0.-49 RESIDENTIAL LOT
17 1.583 5.&27 0.28 RESJODnlAL LOT
18 1,646 J.800 0.43 RESIDENTIAL LOT
19 1,567 3,150 0.50 RESIDENTIAL LOT
w 1,646 .'.5,150 0.52 RESIOD<TIAL LOT
21 1,583 3,150 0.:,0 RESIOO<llAL LOT
22 1.648 J.156 0.52 R[SIOO,TIAL LOT
23 1,567 J,502 0.45 RESIDfJ<1lAl LOT
24 1,583 M92 0,39 RESIDENTIAL LOT
25 1,646 J,942 0.42 RESIDENTIAL LOT
26 ,.,&7 l,105 0.50 RESIDENTIAL LOT
27 1.646 J,105 0.53 RESIDENTIAL LOT
28 l,',83 J,105 0.51 RESIDENTIAL LOT
29 1.646 J,901 0.42 RESIDENTIAL LOT
30 1,646 5,048 0.33 RESIDENTIAL LOT
31 1,646 5.830 0.28 RESIDENTIAL LOT
AVERAGE 3.126

PARCEL GROSS LOT OWNED& PROPOSED LAND USE AREA(SF) MAINTAINED . 33,000 HOA PRIVATE DRIVE
B 3.010 HOA PRIVAllc DRIVE:

C 30.465 HOA 8"511</lANOSCAPE/COIAAON Nil£A
0 33,856 HOA BASIN /1.AliOSCAPE/COW0N AREA
ti~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ij
•1 ,; 1r·,1 .... ~
•~;!;
I
~.. !~', .
~rn .~ ~
i
ti
J ~ I
~I
~-
~i
5i!
Ola
mi!:
a: .. ~ on
~r
:: f 0~
..
- ; £ GT
~ 19963
4 ·F 10

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
, .... ·-·¥ ---~-;_--:Yr~,1 ----->~=:=~~~~;~YLOR BLVD I -~-~~ 3z7;;:::_~~-:-:-:-~~,,r~~---==--=-,~~i~~_::~: ~_ ~,~;~-:~--:~_- ~----~~._ i_-~iT_.--._ -_.-_-j2=-~--- ..-:. -•- /~I °'\ ( l '-••-••-••7~•-\.,,,,:-:---"_;:7~::-••-_••;---:•:;:r_r~(,-_•l\·. - r _1 1 r: ' ,Ii/?,·- - ,-- - ( \ f . .._ " ~ .,,J_ 7'\ \ ' ' ,-. ' t '/ \ • ' ~ i-'~ .,.~ < ( ', '\ \I') ! I i ' • ., . . , 1 \ 1: :< '" ,· ,\ ·-1: , ' ~----'--.----'-''+r-----..,..,.----,-,---,----.. PMC1:l C ._, ::'i ~- '·, •~~- , ·.. ! . , '"' -- -
..,. ·a • --..----.----.- ., "."''>'·•~-.-- -- -~ --.---.---.----i ( .----, - -- . - - r
.i- i, - \ J
r ': :
. I , . I l ... 1\ 1• 10 •"if "' =-- !.. ;-· - '- \ I ~ I , ! 1 -1111- ~ ' ~-'ceiii\ .~;~, .. ft . ~ :G ,
I -~'
I ·•·- . i :-· L.
•. . : ~-l . / ~ "-. t\ _\· ': 1.-.I I'
_. I 1
I 1 ' I
' \of \ ,I ~?i \:;-~9 ' '-~• •·.; j ___ l -;-i. ~:- : __ - _,:_, : ____ ,, •. -- • " • \\\ jli: i ', ; -f ; ) f •• • ,1 - - ~ "' , i ' ;· I , ~ •· ! ~ : 7 . i' ,· e I -'; ,· .- &) :~ f-.£ 4 i -: ',,' \ ,;. !! ' , "; I \ \ ~
I. ~~.).-' ~ \ \.._,;_ ' ' I ' ... .. '- I ·' r- I I ! I I I\ ·:: ·: i I I , @-:i \ . ~ - r-- I ! ! ! _ . I . 1 • ! . . I i .. ."- I I I O !l I , ' '\ \ f' I \~- 11,...---1~· \ ~'!~\ ' ) ' ...1::-c: I ' ~'i,i:!1 ! .j :·1!,·\ <t -!~I i',J }_: \\ l;!; , , I ! p Afo JO 60 ,Jl-, \ \ ,~ ~ \f] I ' 'f,. .,_: , __ t _L.cc : .. r ..;. .:- +--'--- ; , c .:., __ ,_ ,' ...:- ➔-- -- \\ l.!i1'1i ' i i ·' ~ SCALE:1"cJO" ' ' ' ~.- ":'--/\ \i'\'i'.,,.--,,..- ----.,-- . p - -8T~ Cllllll ·:i •,\:f::' II ,',_~ :) CONTRA COSTAl \ ~ - \. ~\ \.~ ~, - .-- :l IGUTTEII . !~I~'. ', .. . \\I"'\: · i I : \ i CANAL I _;.~- ~ Vl!Rf!COL ,J!l"l~ ·, ., ' \,o '\' l 11 \, ! .I : _....---,.-,_,,§.).. . _ _ -~ -- ·--- __ __ • ___ .J.Y,Cl,l!II ___ , __ --c::_ ----- , \~ ,.- \tj' ,/: ; , 1 3 1 l 1 .- ', ' \ 12 ~ "'",.'tu 'I b,. ,,,----:---r,--- 1 \ :..--( .... / ... ;fe::, ~ 'jj 1 • J ; , .) -- -1- - - . • --- --r - 1-- -,------- . .· \ l~· 911.,.,, , ., ,, , ~ , I• 1' . i· :::§ : J .\ ~I'" -- " ~)t(-J ' !"j I •- • :, I • ~ • ., <. ;i \ .. \ / ·n' ;;<; I I • , ~ C' ·, ,-, ' I , .; -I , t• -~ . •"'f l I I ' I r ' I
- , : - L t- . I-!:!, "~· - I -.'V! ··--\ · , , ·. ' ----- - - '1 ' : c ' · } I ~ ' i.! ; I ..... IL · ,I l 25'1/ 1 ··' j; 4.· ,J 1 lj :::> 1 \ ! , ' ! ' -4 l .f ' ~ I ;__ ,. I • I p, . ' I ,._J "\... "'""' •, , · '-"'· , , 1 -... 1c , . 1 , j srM'IWIO L'<rs:im;r~tm,11tln'ERN.1,rr¥£CR()Ut,ii)

OPEN SPACE
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 35,570 SF
(SlOEYNIDS AHO BACKYAllDS)
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 18,884 SF
(FRONT YARDS)
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 1,344 SF ( FRONT PORCHES l
OPEN SPACE BUFFER 64,597 SF (PARCELS C AND DJ
TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 120,395 SF
OPEN SPACE PER UNIT: 31884 SF/UNIT
TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 215,849 SF

PARKING
PROVIDED: 140 SPACES (4,5 PER UNIT)
GARAGE: 62 SPACES
DRIVEWAY: 82 SPACES
PARALLEL: 16 SPACES

16.48%

8.75\

0.62\

29.93\

55.78\
(STANDARD 8'X 23')
'-"-• C •
0 -i [· -ff~ ·-• ___ .. I ' "--'. 1) PRIVATE t!I\ liJ ! , I : t "- S""'-'l< 2-:" ....,J~' w.,. eo,_,, \ ·., \,.. ---.. ~ft] , \\ · · ~-' l -~ STREET A ~"'j_: j ''_ . •_""""""' _ Y . 1 . m "''.sER'iE"REts.1F:i<Eei CAil a£ ')::...:!t - 1 l - ~ · ;-, ~-~-_, - r<~; -~- , w; !~~ ; ✓ ~~~,r?~~:~r.c:.i~rJ:~,t,K --, ~ - -- V.] j, Ii I ; ; \. REQUIRED:
· : 1 ~,i: •: , il i f '
. L ~J lJ- 17R : L~-- -t· 1!: ! : I : I ~ _.) EXCESS:
62 SPACES (2 PER UNIT)
78 SPACES (62 DRIVEWAY)
~ ,,\""· ·.:: '1'11 '" I I i •J,, '"·' - - · -· I • ::i '" I ' .

PMCELO :::~ ,.I : ;
'\, __ ..·.· ~ ~, -----~~~-p-.. .,,_ .. -- Fsi"1lll· ~-' ~ l!ili ,;11 ;;/''\ \•_;; .... \.._ . _-- . ,:\ \ ,~ --=--ec-~-- .- . P _ o,;.Jl. _ ... _ .. · . :~; 1II _., z_._• __ 39'21'E3h,OQ~;r8 --- --·----------- ( -.. ' -· - ,1--, ,/ ____ ,.......,, _ , r· HID'"° "'"''r· _ .... - , .. ,:;, , , -,~ I , \ \ ~ t~,.r (" , •,._ ~/ . • J\'fE LOOP A 07, ~unl\11_;;;..;; .... s.1.- -= -· .:' \ ,: ' -i f.tt - -,·--- - -- -· . -• ., ... -- ·\ \•- · -~'-' · .. ii pRI\1 - ---•- ~ ----' ,_----_:-:1 \~- \i- -, ii{/:f; :::j..._, i I;' l'i, ;I 11
-: "~~ ( ·....----' \ ,-- ,1,:j ~ \ \Pl ', ' 11 18 ··1 I ~ ' i'i~ ;!i i \ ·\ . ----~. 119 I -;----_..>~_;. ___ _ , I~ •I : . ~;, 1 ~ \.Y~~ 17 --- IJO S , _____ \ !- -- - - • - :t !:r~, :ii ·1 • • ' ' l- '::. I ,, I 1 '1- ,,iJ,, ' 'K~ - r- . --.,.,,,-v-r J'', : !" , -, \ • ~ ______ i:-.- .. ,: r- : J:,_lll I ' Jo. u, ! ...., ~.,.,..,,• I 1 I I IQ \, \ ---- I 'Si ~ '1~ p I l .- ,' I : ,ii ..... •• I ' L'I -- L' I - ; JV , I I I ,, ~ r 1 ,..,. 1 ! , ,.., ,r .... ,. 1" , I -~L ............. , ... ~~--:•-r-,•·-,18.,BN~· -··-""·"•~---~==-~~=-•=-k,,-;-.,..,,..:...~--:,'~- -r:~# i I \. ~-h~-• -~~ 39 21 E437. 'Yi~_,.)~•~._>-•,/"'--..,_~---:__/ ""- 1/ : /' r r ; .f' : ' :
-'\ "\ ' - ·' , ,,,- ' · '- ,r",........... r-, "--. .-,-;-----x ·/ ,..,. \_ 1 ' , r. ./ , I r,. , ,',. 1· • ✓ '-· .. / • . ·" '\ \...1 r , 1 , it, (16 PARALLEL)
,.,C,C,0.,118 ,1
NG GUTTER / *MTCH AWA(lf:Nf
IUN. 4' a.ASS ti _ _/ lll»iiE!DYCRD8811.QP£
M011£11ATEIIA!IE
VERTlrAL SPILL CU1B AND WTTER m
I
"'~ <[
.

UI . i!
-~
l
~ij
;; ~~ ~ !~ Gcti
I
J .'1;
~}
ii >cS
lllzf
sin:

Ot,_ md
a: "'Iii
O~i: ..J:"
~!i
1-1
oi
~
;·•;ECT '
1996.3
5 I f JQ

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
:~~~»~,,~,,~~~~~=-~ ~~:;~---:~~~"~~~;.-,:::.< ___ ~;;.i;i~'t. : : 1/1 ~ \ ) ~ ) ; t \ ! 1 · ·1 J,; \ \ ~u,oil" I -' ·. ' 1·' ,I \ < .,v ,_LC ,,?---.-~. . •. ,,, I 1 ,,
\ .... ,,_~-.; . , . . . ~~_' ' - .. - - , - ,. \ --·-·\\\ ·< ;" I I ;!I \ ' _;{_-_. · • \ 1 ~I I : '1 ' .,....----- \ I \ l I!.> :
\ · '\10\ _ ---~ ;-·--·7 1:1, 1 1 I • . I .... \ 9 ' 1 8 b s I I I I I ,. , , :: -r . .. : c ! , . ;
coNTRA
CANAL
cosrJ
>
\
\ ·,
('• ' - -::::::::==-:
- • - - --=-
~ ~ '-' ---==-=-=
-·
.
-
-- -i
i
r
t
, !
!
. ~
;
-~~! ' I
\ . J. · _1 :~•r; ,, \ ~ ~ ~ ::::::::::::f I , l:z/ lt
\. ~ ---==o-----f--! : 'I i-l 'I 21 V k
15 _ • ~• : i~ ! •·
\\~\ -- --_-\ -~ -·::·_· \.-..... _ _ ....__--,-___ __,___ . I =::~ 'rl , : t_ i~!tt,./ \ .........--:::· • • . I I ' : ' I . - .., ~ ·, ,-- 31 24 ' ' - ! I : : I :l
f \ ', \ JD - ~ ;' I I. !J i i
\ ". . • PARCEl.O ! !t :1:
\ \ ' : • -· -· 1' . . :, d ·; I • I . $.' _'J \----, •• - • I ' lf .(_/, " \ - . ~ -~ __, W.J-4i. .:r\ ·,:- .k\ -
0 \ - •• .....____ __ :=:...--:::::::::::===-r- I: ;if : ~>: '!; . ~ - ·. i. ,'(t! ~ ·. -. '~ .. ; ;( ,'
~ \ \ . ·· .. ·· . · ' f I ' l • ,. · _.,. \ . _/ , { · ' .\ \--0· \ :---{~: ''- 1t· ' ,._.._ ' • 1..- ·. ·< . • ,, I \ \ • . , . , I i' :. ,• ~i"f-~ / \ •, 1 ' (I 'I I
' • ' , ,i , i \
l ,_ • ..-·-U ii ;jl I , ~ .. ~- . x5 / I '_ . ! • '. ,: II \ \ -J " I ' I
1 ' r,-,~ 1'j·' l _jj- ·
1 I ' \. ~ ,•J . • ....--=.-.~.,,_-.~-~=·----:-:·:-=:,.:.:...,._._.~._,,~-=-••1{,.,~ -~ -~ : . ~ : . , : :i '-\.. - ---~~= .. --..-· ,~---"", -I ' ,./ 7 I " 1 ~','~';-';-'/ . , ..,.,-"i'>-z r....,,_, _;:-;;,~~·'>--.. , 'r \ ' I , , . . ~ ('
'~1ll'W..11M~~::=:1.l'.ffitB=w.~11mm.r.i.
l
T
JO l!O Sr.ALE: 1"=30•
~ 1J
Fire-Fi,\rc.e Arrow XT 1 OS ladder
~~:~~II ~9~th Qv0rall 3o-:ly Heioht l)in Body Crour.d Clec,ror,co Tra ck W1Jth L:;::k-to-look tirr.e '.1ax 5teuing AnJle (Virt ual) -l!ntlltlndliillllr
4 1.1 ~Oft 8.0COtt

11.554ft

1.335ft
~ .00L}fj

6.00s
.,9.SC"
I . .::
;
' :~ •~~it
l
~j __;.:_ •1 .. r
"! i~ u
f
~I
>d
~:'.~
::::> :1--
01-• m~w !i
~~~ ..JEi ~mi ~-
_:.
~
0~
... § ' £ CT :.
1996.3!
."HT
6 •·f 10

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
•
'll .,. Hf Pl( F/1.YAI
l'l'IICIL.D I , V,lli 111>-FIIICE,j ll&lfSPlNII ··--~~ Vt'"J.:U.--~ (~Jt~;J--- . --~·-·-·-.-,L- ---- ,: 1 .. • I ~·-·--- ,,
:.; 4• 12'
VARW: tMm.fDUY
~~5'-/, vk¥:i,;~-~-1:-;-=i:-1 ..::.= =
SECTION A • 32' WIDE PRIVATE STREET [PRIVATE STREET Al 1111 CIR! .. [ -~,20)t<<{;g;,_ .. SECTION 8 · 28' WIDE PRIVATE STREET IPRIVA~ LOOP Al
:;::,.~··_//~','_:///~;( ·'::.· -•: -: ·~,.-~:.

I'
T
SCAl.£.1"-.)(I
LEGEIO): _
IIOTIS:
t."""ffl IIUT I FDR SPlU ffllTICN.
-DO'J\IL. 2. IEECITYltMIIWrtt1-1FOII
IT ___ _
ft a~:~10•
I i·•' n J
:· . I,.-• ""... · /"'TAYLOR BLVD ,· -_....:;;;;r,~ ·-··------··-· --. -------- / · :,,,
T
I'
r
r---
L
~ :
1 ·: :
.,- :
: l I
l\;.,1-~\i'/. -._ ~..
1 F "' :_•1·,1' : .. - ........... ...,......;a r:
.-, , ~, ~ 1;;;.;~::::::;::;::::t";w;::=====~~;:::;;:;::::::::: I : 'i\~\~,; 1Qjp rJ, > I )I' ... ,, . .-.::: .'. ·
211 ~ ~~;;;g~ I 14'\ t i
1 ,' -~ .~ '_\·· '. P102,I l\_ l
, -_\- \\' , l .,
\ \:.

SECTrON C · 28' WIDE PRIVATE STREET IPIUVATE LOOP A)
"'
00111: 11 ~---=.-=r TA'1.III "'"""'.Jr \_..,.-;;:.;~,. ... I .. 1 • ,,,:: SEC~~-:- --= :\·)\ IF-......... ~~..,._...:....;_ui ~ • : ' ··%:, .~.,...~-....... i-,,.wf-- ---w..a-,1 .f~~~=ia~.;;;;;;;a;;l -j;. .,.,,4., a;;;ij,.i:I ~I 3 I 2'&.S"P.AIE,,W,cc■, SIE EVAE
P/L
1!.'_llbl
~I~ k__:_--- -~J&_ NIJGl/ffll 2' FILLMIJ(i
, ... . );/..;;). _:·i!'.-7·,.f/~L?k:2
f/L
SECTION D • 20' WIDE PRIVATE Al.LEV
(PAIVATEm Al.LEV 11
IWHE.O -I 1•
PMr&D
~
~
IIETJ\lJUIIIISECTION E • 28' WIDE PRIVATE STREET
(PRIVATE LOOP Al m F/1)
I 0:E49lfff 3r.,,··
~
2~• r;,L• 7'~,t_ PlffllGI ~!l.111::~~E~
Rio-•l"liiiiii., I ~.,..::,
{=,:7:tt=i~-=~ 1.--,:-:1/L···-. SECTION F ., ..
---.,.- HllTJIGlAE£9
ScCTlON8
-m--
l'.USTllll ~1-T- mum::k-" ITll-FEMlE
-.::;~ ti -~- -~-'
!ml........ . *lCICIIIIIIOIIID *''"' SECTION J .,... ...., .:MUil m SECT~ K SECTION L -m- ~~ [,jll"flFtft•
-.,.-
EmTING~PIL ~kl~
~,, I:~ it . JO\,_\ . 31 . ~ .....:.<..,+;i;,_.;..~--41~~-+-~L.-_,...,~ ,, I ~ ,.~ ( · ., i. 1ili4.2 1- g / i-.
\.-1~'-"'"" fllST'lNIMIMI)
•SIMI.E.LOCATIONII/Olm'UIIITO
IE rnw.um CI.IIDIQ OESUII
SECTION P - ... -
. • 'I - J I ...:i_ ; h
' lci=:d~~:::::;::::;:::;::::-;=.::~~~~~~~~ =''J:~ I I ; - ' ' ' ,, ~ J, ,- ;; ,,1, \ \, _,.__~_.,,.=r, !•,'I 1 , :t ,,,,\ \:11•r \ ' / / ' '-; .....- . Jt ~" \;,,, ~:~~_;~~1;::::::::~~~~~F~~bv~~·,·r / .:!I 1 ' ;r'~ ~' :\ / ,, I' 1 - I I ~.:
' l-T.
'\•~'' :
1 , '' t i ,CONTRA 2osr /.' · t ,/; 1
CANAL ;,·,,1'.' . .'' 11 l '. I ~
i\UllNBkLl)CJSfJIIG....,..\
.... il ,, !!
~,'.,:•m~Wl '-EXIS111111-
SECTION H -.-.. -
S£CTIOII 0 -mT ~LI)-p,p
·!:11Ml1 '-....,,.,_
SECTION I -mP/l
,,.. ·-:::~d~~~~~i~ts2t:r:=s /,mLO ' ' '\ .,
1 '\~:~,- ·. ,c,··~~- :·'.'. ;;~;~ :,.-::/:t: '</(ti~ { )Jr- \ . l. ·._: ~..,;,,;;----;;;;,,;~~,;~~~~ ,, _1.: .. -.;~---!$•·;; '-=E:!~...-.:::E.""~~"'"":--r~ff..;-;-~~-.it:. ) I I ·~~ - ,/ '•', · • • :.,r~• ,..,....;..,~ r' t ,,/ , J I'/' • \ \ -~.,...· 'I ·-, ,~";;:- :, , K , I "'· p '. _.,.___""' ,,· __ , 1, / I ) I '•~. \ 'y I\.-• -- . /'.~I,: ~ ,l ,: )R,--:;\ r' • , .-;•';. ,-y,•~~I _,; \ I 1., /,, • '• , , , ) I :. : 1~• / f /•" , ·,., } • ••.-...._Y y' ~t r' \+</ ' •, , , , /'-- . ~ I ", -·. f ., ,.,,- . ,., > .... __r - ---, ~ ' , ,, , \, ,, .. , ~ f.. R / ~ 7 .. ---- .,.,, ' I -J,c.\. 1:

T
\,,..-1:I IQ
PIIIVATEUXIP9 ,,L •'M
1 ~ ~ -_fill!_
., .Y ,._, ____ LITT ___ _
~,
JI!. SECTION N - .. -,-
PIITINGGIIWID\
~:1I~~
~ ~; ~ ij
lt~=i· . ~ It
• • i!
•ti' l
·i,_t:. -i !~ HI
'
~ ,.:.
ti.
~
c .. ~·i5
5ii"- os:; mi
IC ... ,. o;?!a: ...1Ei
►, ... ~Ii
ol ~ .... J,
I• ·"'-E..'.T.
1996.3
7 ·F 10

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
-- /""- -~-I \ .. '- ,. J _ _ r' ', . ....,_,....,~~ ~,.,·,~, .. ~. f-' ---· ~ ~-<>,,-.,__.,-.. ~---- o-- -, t-"'" · o· · ]AYLOR BLV~ ~-- ~~~ .... ~--<>-----,,----,,, -'¥ ,~ . ,,..,,.,,__~"'<-.....,_ !- \' +-·!:=-•·- r l· ,
~ c~ -::c~oDrr:=::-1;;)(:5~::= ~-t~~-~~~;T -~ =-----.. , -c~ ~ ~:.~: ~ - --r:~ .. ~ i . . • ~::..::::.. . lhn~•-· , ·. ,
-,:,,:-:.~-·~-;~7 -~:,;~;,~~-~~-•.;-~~=~ -:·:~,::::~::.·::::!:~~c~t~f ·r.:r"I -1\..X:•-,-. \
•
~·~
~
=-!:-.:..=-- - I ;-~, ~ \ r'
\ U'•U"
........ ~
'
(
.f'._.:£-.,,, (L~~-!...,...:-.--.
~ 15' °'-=~~~ ,PNICfL c~
>-- ·-
""'"""··
'-··----,---·-"";-··-·.,..,_--------
;i
I 'c-: .. ., .. }
'l."'~~- ,,,,~.,..,-· ,r
....... , _,.~--~
~. -
t\ \ \ ,
'l
,..
- -·
,
' ·
I
1 - ,!
i
. ~r-
• /
1 l, - \ • .. ·. \ ', -- £!-- ~·-wan ~ ......... .w111~- ... .. -;--:~~~~ st!l .i .,.,,t", .. ( \ ,'\ '110·\J\ : I I r- \ ' -\..___ ~---""'c-i=-- -~===-,-,-~~-~ = ~ • ' • ' 113•.15•111 ~ ~ !Ill 1 \' i'" 1 ' \\\ _____ __- ~--~\ _ --·:.·,~: .. ':.~ - .._._._~-- ::.:__:; ·. · \ ______ .'.::.'=!,~.,_,---··-· ., __ {;•~~---~- ---\\\---_ \~: , I r \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
IS"INVMa,li .. , . . \
>,\ -------11 _
{
• - - . ., ••• w• Woff - /' ... " - - - - I ,
. ~---- :;:\!,-;;;:;;.~===::;;;;;;::;:;;=:::-::=i-1?==~:::::::!!::~:=;~:;;::~:..:..-: < \ ICl•l5'80 --· -- ' ) ) \---1!: 12 4 . t,0.(1113 .... . ___ :: .,_ · --- Jle'!!.''h"fl'""-""-,- ' ( ". \ Tt10I ,·so. ---in' -"'~ --- , \
,_"' \ ____ _-::"" ;t -!r { } \ 29 I 29 27 , a _ J
. \ \ 13 --==,----,--1--1 ~-.... --'""'.... tT../
CONTRA COSTA \\ I ............... - - -t---'!"-r=--:-t-++>sc--• .. ,N CANAL 1.. ~. _ _ _,___ _ L ~ ~;S~~~f:-~...,.___ ---4-1 . . ~~; ~.
~ N ~\
' j 31 : i\.'_?,.,.... 30 , !l 1
: i \-- .... -~.:_:~}~~-a.--- ---
-
. -·. ___ .. . . ~~~ ••.•. . 1· ··! . , ! , Iii r _i_ . - ·'tt{- . -.:.... .-~ _· ,_ -

1..\ ~ - ·::-:-::.---~-j 22 - j@ ;i~ i_F;h~,-- •• ~ \ ·.\"" -.--------1. \ 19 20 I -- ,LlG!' , I W 1 1 :::> .:
' ... \ 18 t' ;. I ~ i \ \\ 11 ... · · ,I·· ·· l; I ;: \ ',_ ~..,-= ✓• '' I <J!- • \. .... ........ --=- - - - -_,.~; I i I ~ • ------""'---- - -- .:.·.7-~...--.= - :.n , ,.
' \ :;;~,,=-,~,-··~"";":~:='.~"',~"'==•'"'i~·;-fr~J:

I .,,.,.,.\,,.., .... , -• ,.:c,., ,·<1,K r~-, ;::., . ...._ "",-: > ... ,__,.., ,: ,.r· \ / : ,.;. _:
~ • :: )_ / / 1·._ ~~· - ~ t" .,.V\ i1 ;-. ·.. \ I _' ,i; .\ 1..,.., . / ~- , , _..,' -, ~ ) \ .,.,.,.,._Y r(--- 7r,.J.,,...; ._.,; '\ \ 'I . ' / / ' ' / \ I -; ",. ,. .. , ' ~ ,.. ' ' .,...,, . I "- • r ~ - / . r I ~ l : ::
· ,\ / / · ', ( / r J j /
I I ,../ ' ' · " I ! ,---
UGOD
Mffllll'UlYFQ1111EII:
l
T
i SCAI.E,1"=30'
t. 1.GCAn ana1: a,(TIR KR cca> SJ.MIEWml.

2. UN'J,fEBtiLATEAAlPERcc:allBTIINDMOS.
3, PftQIIOHDUfD.fflSHM!illllTMEPIIELIIJINft'
vrtLm PLM .W: 8IILEf TO FJW. llf811rntltli
DESIM ~ cm OF l'UMNfT' Hlll, toll, NG PGIE RMlWMtDAl'PIDAl.. tt•IJ:N
,rfl'Ir:aLDlllEMIUllS""'5$
IIJJmODIEIIIli.
tlfHEPlM
-OFBlllEIW.C
,,c========:U::::::l==========
TYPICAL UJILIJY LAYQUI DEJAJL, ·r
~}~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
lu·i . ;;;,
l
•t;_ r~· _.-_ '. ~;
.J 1~ i. ir
;
!
~ I
?i
Oo
a: i
<o r:i:~ 51~
ii2 .. :2
~Ii ..Ju mui
~IIE
ol
....
;~E9T63I
!:'HT
8 '. f 10

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ..
• LEGEND
~~-: ~--~-~"~;;; -~-~;~~--~==--===--}AYLOR~~~~~-=:--=:_'.:=~:--~--~-~----=·---~~·=-.. -~ - -~-=--f-~-;~'.¥:fT--~~_-\ □ ~--- Ci ·=- ............ ~~~--~~--- -.,,.,£".:~~"'" --- - ----· - -=-~- )\ :,- j .. . r:'7

PEIWIDUS
AIIEA•88.407SF
... --';l!.';"··-r "\,,__ _ _. ,,..,,,~-__,.~,~-....._ ,, -~-, _,..,, ... ------- -""----~·--=- = -=--'-=-.~--~\,~- , ."';J' i - -. ff LJ \ / ) . . . ,-. ...._~ -.,......=a-1-"illlJt_---:z:!!t~ ,---~ ...- , ·,· - ~I -- ~I □---:. 1 ""- ~ · - , · • '.,,. .:::....._ PARCa c ,, " -"DMA 3' I · '/ ' . - ( .-•l:•_:"'1""!".--· wraz_ '.'"!!"'W--...__, -z<- ._ ,..,...,ous1NA......,·ED•<S,1018F \ _, •• _ , __ ' · .•_ • I• •· ----- . . 'F.. . -~ .a... .. r ·· ~TIUf Otfl:.!- _; _ 1 ~:-~7·- · · • Ptll'itU AltEA f'RlAttD ~ %1.1l1 SF ,... /.. . \ 1 \ · 1 ; r••
~
-1S~m~~~•~--.....:..:. , ·-J·, ...,_ _....__,. ,••,--(~-":""'' 'l--- .\ .. , .. IASIN-•1,1318' T01M.AHEAIJMAlz72,0MSF _.,,,.~• _,)' l MIEAlllolllllTIIIITill.llAAJM SYffllltltfAYLOFIBLVO \ ,\ ~- Iii •1, , □
. e~_.,. __ , ·',·-'.' ""'"· ~ . _,,,. ,sELI:•TREAnNG-AREA•n,e5?sF 11, If, • ' f • ·':-_c__L~O. -••~ •-.n~~~ .. ••-'.•-••~••r,'· .. •f~ ••.\ '1 \; ,: i IIOAETSfTIDlfMEA
(HIYt(UIJ•8,4471f
1•ERVto1SAODF
AIIP•50,13:ZIF
DftRVlOUS STlfiT
AREA• 28,774 Sf
. .11; :'_ :~: ____ i L'. ... : ____ ~_·.~ ,::::~71-::·:·_;~.> PNICE1,Alj t/ !:: . .! tt. - -- :· f.:: : - :1 r:~: _ -- _J ;·.:.-:. - ·:J ' -_ -_ ; . ' I • . . ' I· I ;,
;1
,I
JIPE'ltV1'1U8 .tlLEY
AREA • 2,3308f'
llffRVIDUSSl_,_.AIID
.._..,l°MEA""7,320tF
lll'ERVIDUSDlll'IEWAY
NIU• t0,94DSF
~ .,~ __ - - _ ,,11- ~ • _ ~:_,, <(=~-\ . :1· : ;: ! : I l 'tJ.. . _ _. . _ .\ - " · · ii I I - lll'BOIMllt,RY
~ - , , .\~: ~:~:;:.:_: _ _ - • OMA~ ~ -, .. ~ ~\~:?~~) : ~~ j :
\. ~ '· -:::\-:
1 ~;--~ /" :~1. ~ :. I ~it >.CI .ffi .. t.tUt .I " :~ ~- -- - ! 1r: 3 ( b. . .... 1 _t_._ ... . _ --- ~ .. ------; '\ ~====::::::::!ft.J' ! l i·;_{i ! l u 1
1:, 3 :
i[ L
ji l' ;
't• i
' JII..,
I 1 1 •:
... ,M ... -, , ; i I J
1: ~i:;;: :-Jr-::ll 'I \ i I ; l-
\ · __ -~;, j/ t)iJ, {1~~: '' '" '\ ~--'\;_-:--- ·'!Q#nl' ·:,,, t'~nn•- - - · \ ', {ff/ ri• .J.;,f :; coNTRA cosrA-,,,_·,·_:.:.'_•-~ ~:\•1.!•:·:-if· ~- -r·-~\ ··J\'»'_.1 :.\ 1:J -.'-1 , ,1t; 1 1~·,: 1:.--::

CANAL \, ' ~~--:"':":: __ •,,_. /;_::, - _:,j~-~ _. -_-~~:~'f~; ~ \' .tj~ '. 1~ : r 6~~ 5 ~ ll ,.,. p
• ' '- . :, - T 'I', 1V ' • 1,-· , I •- - .. I ---- I .. ~ ri' r ~;:/g,a:.~:~~~AI PARCEL o \ :, ; : ! '=F't~'M: ',.,_.._~- / -vi · l llif, ; 1, 1I '
~-- !' I OMA 4 ;-,..;~' ~I! ! '
1 ',J ' .......... , ~ /..,.. -~ : .
.... ~~.-:;-~---=.,.. :..-.:El:----~~~· ..,, . .,..__ 4~.l.d:. ""'--- ~-" .,,___,,~ _,,_-:-.:r.c: 'f ' / f I -~---:- A'\ .r,,_"" ,<, ',>'-----, ./,.,..___"'-. I) I' l), ' :1 I I,
i
1 T
~ SCALE: 1•=:J0" r
~ IELF-TRfAltNl!I/ ',,
- ,_· .· I''- r-~ ,,~--...,..,~ .,,:--.• -~I ..,,. "i ! I'.,; YAR.!9. STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN DATA .r· BASlN~UdT09f
DETllllllB 1ITTff FINAL OQ:IQN
I
• 8'$1Wl.AMl8CAl'ING
TOliPETEIIIIlft»
WITII FUW.DHION
4• PaftJMT(D auet1WM
PlPETOTUMlMTE.ITH
CH'PEII Cl_,,-. LDC,\n
PO<GNTIIACDSl~<::LEAN
IITEIUl!A C1JlTHUlflllGJECTIOUIIDMY) 211.MtSF
HTIMmt NSl fl lMlt DISTUIIIWCE 172,&ID28F
f :!~ ::;•.-:::i~:-~) OUTUT Rlllll QU,1NIUOl91 1118SF -, ~ i-._ I / , r• 4Pl!POMTEOSteblAINf'lPETQ /:-1 ~
NlfE WilH CAPPfDCWMIUf.
4 \~_I I/!~:.! *2MEA=72,0ll!F •&Al£A•21,1571F 2t51"8Sf
'{~•~: ~ -r ~i:t: :~~ET c::TCH .IL . ½,-15'1lUW.'LLPIPETIJCCINNECTTIJ r _
t,'ffl,~,,...,"%"'M,..,..,~+,r,:i;:,,,,~~~:,,-":,.,,..,,,h,,,d]a::,-,-·":,- J ~ l..._ET IN PRIVATE STftftt A l)III,tCl:00M11'0LIFGIIIIIETiflINGO,
ll'lll•lffiff\'DA,111JOIFICATIONFlOIIS F:::::~~ ::L1 j
_,,.,.,.

SECTION A -NII-- * 3: t 91.Dflf 8EUII' MltT IUSlA El.EYATitll 2:18lOPf."80YECIIIUTIU$fRREYATIC.

SECTION B -.,.--
·11>1 (1UTJ'ALLPJPETOcoa:CT
TOF1ElDINLETlNPMC£1.C
DM4Mf.Aali,'971F
111'9NIIE.I,• ,,79011f
PflE•PftQJi£CT lltPEAVJDUS AREA
lllil'UtfDI-DUSAIIL\
-Dlllf£AYIOUSAIIEA
PDa'T•PAIECT DPfRYl(IIS AREA
PEACEN1'1NCREA8EOf1WEfflOUSME'A
82,IMSF
a,•SF
14,U7
97,488
111\
!l!lill
TIIA8H CAPTURIE DEVICE 10 IE UCITH.lEa AT ALL IIIILETl1 ~N111N'.l~f}ro;,-~ a;::~~(.'ltldl ~C.:.o.,:4
~NN: '«((l"•'
-..n'-"f!INlll~: ' 1!1.-,

11. s.tf-RflairitngArtn
',-"f~.;..~,
JV,A.tbSD...-nlnglofM~
=~=.::::.~.:,(~T,r,-:C)
~~~,!-.. :~ _~:,½f '
- ·: ~~~ . ;~ :=;:f-
,.......-1::: ~ ;--:1-~ ,w•-• • - __ •:•_.
~ - I
,_,,._.__ __ ,- _ .. -~~ . .-..~~-·~ o,..,.~ ..... _ -
Sonwara Tool Warnings
"°""""'O(l$to--
Pn,;.ct !\lama: .• ~!o1 c .1 ·~ • ....i
~~~~:!.1:-~o,
=rllftl~~!:~ .. : ,,,
rv. A,.. Dr.tinlJtg to SMPs
:;~~me: Ba~(SoilTyp,&: C)
=::r :~ =t:-~--- ;; .. ~ . .. - ~ . . . ;
- ; . • 7 =~t:-= --~ "::::
8oftwat•ToolW.1™nas
No warnings to ~ort.
~t~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
lj
•bi~
I
M·j_ ' :i t~_ Ji~
J• .. ~ it., Je
.. l Ii ! diifit &/ !ft~, ~,.,, ..,, i!c'\,. , I!!
;~@ ~ =>~t;'' ;
_§> ;
; i
~
ii..
-cl
~25 eel.,_
>ii
W111,.5
si.is
Oli"' mi5 IC:;
0~8
.... ~~
~ffi§
1-5!~ o!,~
~ ~
~I
' ·•-1£."'.'f •.
19963
9 :·•F 10

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
~~~~.,_ ~~..::.-' - ~~~ ~::'---~~--~~--.,,_ .. ',_~:·~~:~~ · ,..,1.AY~ ~~vo· .- , · . -<>-'- t
'-~---o:oor:r-=~):o::~~ -(,~~--~,): _
~- tP~~-:~~ 11:j
l . \ \ I -~ . \ ,,,r ~'i'i.\ '\_J·\ i, ,:/
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
. \ .. \ b ._ ._,.......__+, . . . _ .. ; r ... ·;r \ , . i :( ~ < •=· • , j_ ·•t t ;'° , 1 , \ _~--~ . ~+~'-::'..':.½ . - .. ! ~ i .. \ I ! ~ I ""'r . . x-'!Jr--..--~-,..,____;.... .:. - - .. 'n-\, -! :1:
'. ~~'
l
~ \_
, CONTRA COSTA
CANAL
• .. ff • IS
.. IIO "
"'-.. \,,' I 1 ! 'Ir -~~~ i ; · l . 1, , ,. ! ' 1 \ ): j • ' . TI I j , ' ' '
'\ • I • I I : ' I i •; 1
: l '~ I ; I I ' 'I 't /, .. ·.i. I~.. , I '
',\li)!I; : 1· 1 j \1\:i 1: i I ~l:l J \l~'i t ~'• f ·~ ' " · ~ •~1_- ~m I.I~ ~ CONITIIUCTIOII\ ~"""'
,! 3 :! - ' " : i.t : 11 ·_11• i' 1: i c.:J '--!-.,.,._ ,,· ,,. ...:I ! ' '.'I!. : • ...:I . ' ) ' · . ~ I ' _, I\ < -jf I ! g !:\.~ ! : XL! -~-~ /~-,.-..... I
'1 I ,.;.' · \ ; .. ' ,.,, t(f
~~;J -li·J. _t ~;-t:~~
!·. i : ,,., :
'! !': i[i }l· ':i:l, it! : _l I . i ~-· ! : ! I
I I j 1 '
~
. _I. _L ___ J-----=--~ -~-.-.-,i -· - ! i Ii\ i I j • ' ~ .. ........_ ,...-11 ___ . x-• _::::;;--x-~-ryr• ., r""'/"..,, :/•1I . I :. . ' l
\ \ "--tl- . I ! ;:: . '
'-,.,_', / ,..,""'{,: .: . :
-~ .... ~. ,.;.:::-~~--=~-.,, .. ~~:~~;-=':r~~-:~~~-::-:-_ --=~1---~~--=ff-~1-·r1_:~4i -. t .,,.'I ,. ·-... 'y ,;"'), , \, ..... _;,, .·-::-1 ........ ,, ,.J ~ ' I,_,;,. ' :I I . --. .•·,_. "·"'' -· I y' \ .. ,, 1 ~ '] _,/'\, '-, ✓-·: 11 I_ I '1'{' .J .L t,. \'. - ,. x__ ,' r .I'--, r'- \ \ ,,.,..,..._.v \ \:. ,f-'--- __ .1,.._ ,' . r . ,1 • \\ 't' · .. - . ,. 1 .- .. ;_ '\,,, J -·· ,,./ < f....__,, I '1 \•y;_(: · CAffllBASPll!IM!NT \ . ' . • ', ~,,..,.,._r ' ,.,_ •. ,' \ ,· • '-ff .. ' ' -JlllAT"°' • 1 ' ./ •, '1.::-..• / I I 1·"' aMST11£AIIJNLET
-~' I /", I I
. ' ,_j "-/ ,/ I j- -- / t .

LEGEND
-x-x-
~
c==J
Cl
c=J
ITIWf\llTl\.Qi
PEIIIJll!TtRSILT F'fll~
~~nawe""'4NCf:

CATilH 8A8UI 9ElllllEIIT MIRIER
M'IIJIO&D , ..... OICllm u•n•i
EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 24•HrUttulTM:l'PEIIIOlll:TOIEO£'TEIIRNEODNCf:•CONTMCTIIIJSCHDSEN

1. THEFAClLITlE88tlJINONTHlllfll.ANNIEOEIIiMEDTOCONT1IOLIEDDIEN1' MINO fME RAblV 6tASON1 Dt'TOl!IER 1 TO APAll SO, Af'TEI IIOU8H OIWttNII HAS Bmt ODIPLmD. IEASURES ARE lD BE OPERABU PR.JOA TO ot1UBEFI 1ST 0f Alff YEM TM.T GAADtNI DPERA.TICINB "'VE LEn MfA& UIFROTECIED FRCN E1IOIIGII.

INSTM.I. ,_, MINTAlN ML AEGUIIEO fRDSlllll CDiT1lll. IIEASUIIEI II -IITTIIA&IIIIIT_,. 2. WlrfEfWICEUITOBEPERFCIIIOABFOU.m: A.A, REPAIR QMNl. CMJSl:D 11'¥ 90IL eni.tON Ol ~IOI AT 'l'HE £ND OF WII IIOWMI GAY.

A.8. Wl-el 91W.L It JHSPECTtO PERICIOJCM.U #40 IMIIIJ'AttlED M AEQUJJll!D. A.C, 11M118iTTI..ES, 8EIIIISNIO-.UEtAA£fDII! tNSPECTID.tFmlEADI 5TOAIIIAM>lllPAIRIJMDEAIIIUDED. A.O. SEDDENJ lfW.l BE IIBIM:DMO SEOIMOO' TfW'9 Ren'0MD f00AI8JIW. 0J;IIIEICS'J.OISHN SEOlllQff MS ACCUIU.Alm TOWITtflN ONE FOOT flF llii GUii.ET ELEVATION. A.E. EJllENT RBIO'll£D FIIDI TWI 9HAi.1. BE DEPOSMD 1ft 9JITM!l.E MIEAS NIJDISU(:MAWNERTMATITWILLNOTBICIJI:, A.F. IIILUI N#J aw.JES UT IE 11£MIIIED a. AfTERUTlimTIIEIICIIESNIEIACIIFIWDNIIJCIOliPACTEll,THEUIFM:ESCIVB tuCII liHCIIES l9tW-L Ill IOJNDED SLlOHTl.V TO PREVENT QWll5Llfl8 Of WiTVI JNTIIE1RENDHAAM.CARIIIICIULDBEOERCl8EDTDPROVUIEfORCl088•FUJN 4T FR£QUEllfllrTl!!IWN.9VflfR!tllENCHEIME NOTOllllHECENTOI LINE OFA

4. -•=· H'lllll08EEOALJ.Dtln-.iAAa1.AfTEJllll'DIIOflfS)111BNA11EEll~mD. 9rM'Y AU. MEAi WITH TACIJ,Y. MD STRM. ftUER TC 1'Nt:S ffET AMI tllX,

15. Dl.-lt"8 lit£ Mtlft' 8fASCN1 Al.L l'MID ARIAS SMU Bi Ul'f ClfNI OF WTM W.TflllAt. AHO DEBRIS. 1lfE Int l!W.L IE IIAINTAINED 8D NI TO •m•m IEIIIIIE1if lAllfN RUNl)Ff TD Nl'I l'IOIII DMIN 6"/81BI. •• IJR.mNOTUSBJIWCOIIJUNrnPNnfflEflOBICIICOIITIIOLSHfcLLBEBLOCIED UMI.DI M Mu. DMIJfED 18 I.IDJBTUIIIIIED Ill 8Tl8lLUH. 7. Ml. BN1810N-IIWIJIIU .W.L IE IIAIIITAlNEII UIITll OISTUIBSI INM AR& ITABRIZED, aw&I TQ THll EalOlr CUflllDL PLM StW.L IE MOE 0NLYWl1'1TH!Afl'PROVALOFOAATnEDIIIECTlONCFMfl:IIN'8£NBJNE.EfUN6 DEIWlnENT.
■ 8EJ111ENT BASINS MALL BE a..EMED (IUT lltl:NlVER SEDDENT 'IEIIOIES 1141 flll)[IISlf CUN<DUT LMI.. t. NlfflAIIOWNllll'IIOY!IIEHIAAECOIIITIIUCTID,AU.ST1llCMtB#ff:JINI.ET PIPES IHAU. n "'°1'ECTED FD lllR.OI' Of' SIU BY U8JM8 EIIOSlOI COlffllOL ll(ASUAE8.

10.COtfTRACTQASNAl.LtM.V£toGl.8,EQUIPIIENT,IIG•1EAIAL8TOPaOV1DE EROSICII tolfTIIOL IEASURES IIMJIE" NECE$SMY BY A C:ONITIII.KrrlON 0,ERATIOlt, ON tJ~~
~~,,,§~
~ l
w;i!
~ i~
.Wi.:; ~
I
i;.!~
~ ii rl i~
' 11. ~ 8
1:~ ~!:'~=i,... .. !ffl. ~ 12. A CONSTsu:TICII l:"'1MCE cc.nmffll Of IN, •• TifIQC 21 • a• Q)MS( ~ DMINADCK FOIi A 0JITANCf 0, 50' 18 TO IE PIIOYIDEO AT fACtt VEHICt.E ~ "° ACCE-58 POlwr TO EilSTOO PAVS> &TAE£11, PU AaA0 STAIIWIJI. ~ - 13,THJSPLNIIIAYNDTCIMRAUOflltlltllMTION8TlfATNllll!DIIIING ~ ~- ~ :!Er ~~~::i~~ ~'!:;.tf:'f:.ONB ~r,1~''; t~:,' 21

14.IN&TALL.,.,.. .. mESP!RllllAllOll1HIIIIHEl!T. \,. Je l:i~]f\~ 115, ="'ME~ ='::::v:~-~ SIIM.! TO_OlfflfT il i ~ :J~;' J ~E~NDEO ~~E~ !lX:

BEED VARIETY ! LBS. PER -E RWffN " .•. ··- - ·.-·- •. · ·-.. • - - ,!OR.RO _____ -· ----... . ~ ....... I , _____ , BLNIIIO . .. I 'll!!!i~2'£!' - _- ------ !- __ • __ ·-__ ( ,..~~ . ·---- ..... ~ ____ 4- ___ ,. I .!ILIIE.~~'!li--- .. , __ •••. -• • TOTA-L ' 1!5
. THE elm!ON CDllfflOL. IM.TElttAl.8 Stw.L BE ,lil:0 #ID J,uED 11 , #'PRl)XJ:MTELYTNEFOLJ.mtMIPROPORTille:
~~!!"-- ·--- - - - - }a'IS/~::...l!!;!!f'!'.!28""~•.L-, ~~ae!'--:W~-: ~:_:-.-~ _-2~~~1s: :::. ·_:-:~ fl_!!l!i,!)E...!..,. _ . __ .. , •- _ _ ~ ,.~ _ _ FPITIUZDl.....t:!0-20•10) _ __4/JO L88 __ _
IIATtEA AS NE_~ FOR. ~PLl~TJO!f_
1 T
~o
SCAI.E: 1 • -ao·
~f i
~ I~
'!
0 ~i,
>di! UJ:i ..Ji ..

Stl mil a::; ..
0~
...J: ► ~;t
~~ !I
.·•_,E.;_,j ••
19963
10 "•F 10

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •

COP PLEASANT
Hill, LLC
Plan 1
Farmhouse
Color Scheme #1
Plan 2
Farmhouse
Color Scheme #2

SHEET INDEX
Cover Sheet ............................................................ CS Plan 2 - Farmhouse Elevations ................................. A9 Streetscene Exhibit 1 ............................................. SS1 Plan 2- Craftsman Elevations ................................ A10 Streetscene Exhibit 2 ............................................. SS2 Plan 3- floor Plans ................................................ A11 Plan 1 - Floor Plans .................................................. A 1 Plan 3- Aoor Plans ................................................ A12 Plan 1 - Roof Plans .................................................. A2 Plan 3 - Roof Plans ................................................ A 13 Plan 1 - Front Elevations ........................................... A3 Plan 3- Front Elevations ......................................... A14 Plan 1 - farmhouse Elevations ......... ........................ A4 Plan 3- Farmhouse Elevations ............................... A15 Plan 1 - Craftsman Elevations .................................. A5 Plan 3- Craftsman Elevations ................................ A16 Plan 2 - Floor Plans .................................................. A6 Lighting Axtures .................................................... CM1 Plan 2 - Roof Plans .................................................. A7 Exterior Color & Materials ...................................... CM2 Plan 2 - Front Elevations ........................................... A8 Exterior Color & Materials ...................................... CM3 EVARD

PLEASANT HILL, CA
Plan 3
Craftsman
Color Scheme #3
cs
~2021 WILUAM HElMAU!Al CHARCIUTECTS, lN::. 08A WIV.. I 2018369 I 07•3G-21

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •

COP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
Plan 1R
Lot 26
Farmhouse
Color Scheme #1
Plan 3R
Lot 27
Craftsman
Color Scheme #4
Plan 1R
Lot 28
Craftsman
Color Scheme #3
Streetscene Exhibit 1
Private Loop A

PLEASANT HILL, CA
Plan 2R
Lot 29
Farmhouse
Color Scheme #2
SS1
SCN.E:N.T.S.
@2021 WILLIAM IIEZMAUIALCHARCl~TECTS, tr<;. 1™ V.W. . I 201&369 I 07-30-:11

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •

CDP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
Plan 1R
Lot 17
Craftsman
Color Scheme #3
Plan 2B
Lot 16
Farmhouse
Color Scheme #1
Streetscene Exhibit 2
Private Loop A

PLEASANT HILL, CA
Plan 3R
Lot 15
Farmhouse
Color Scheme #2
Plan 2
Lot 14
Craftsman
Color Scheme #4
SS2
SCM.f: N. T.S.
ii:> 2021 WILLIAM HE2MALt1AtCIIAll:HllcCTS, II«:. 08A MIA. I 2018369 I 07·30-21 1 l ,l,h, I!; o i,
l,~\;,t. , lj

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
~ ~
,
p

CDP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
f.
t
.
~
~
~
~
.
.
-
31'-fY' - 5'--0"' • 15'-6· 16'-6·
~ o l ~l_Q_ II
$ :: /\ MASTER
BATH
It><
:r· ~u I_ .. = =
=i• - c~= Q --+
$- II i i!
~ I I ll/1 I W.LC. :! 1
1 ....... 1
1 1: ·o o r-:----~ i ' ~.... ' ""::i}I 1 ,,1/1 ,I lo
'-- BATll2 IA<:~ SEJM:E I j I!
~ c:_ 11 ~ ~- -~=-~~-~di
~ · 1
I
I I
m °" I
~ - LJ ~ ~l -· l -"" I ~ """ 1t H"Cl.G. ua.a. I N'G.G.
r,t'):V,,... . ~,.., 'I =•--•• W - [ I' 1. . ., m - 1
1& ~ '1« ~
2'-6"
37'--0"'
Second Floor
1,273 SF
i; '\~
.. 15'-6·
31'-fY'
'JJJ'-6•
..
~
i
§) _I~~~ I!] " ... g
V ~
,t.
.... ~
~ ~ ~
..
~
~
~ f'. I I 1
~ '° . ..

PLAN 1
2,316 SF
~ '°
3 Bdrm. I 3 Bath I Den I Loft
Note: (Farmhouse) Aoor Plan Shown Only
19'-fY' 6'--g'
37'--0"'
~
1,043 SF
16'-6·
ffrg
U0 KITCtlEN
~ll
11'-7·
401 TAYLOR eou, EVARD o 2 • A 1 8
PLEASANT HILL, CA Al£: 1/4' e 1'--0'
<1.)2021 'NllllAM H&MAUW.CHAll:Hlll!CTS, 1tl:. 08A V,W,. I 2018369 I OM0-21 ~ i.:

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
•

CDP PLEASANT
HILL. LLC
◄; I
--------•--------
Farmhouse
g
~►
i
PLAN 1
Roof Plans
VARD

PLEASANT HILL, CA
... 5:12
RIDGE
~
◄~
5:12
...,..

I ~►
'◄~ I
1-------t----'-----
i I ◄~ .,.

I
I
-":{_ __ _
~►
Craftsman
2 4 A2 8
S:/\1.E: II◄" " 1'·0'
@21rl1 WLUAM Hl:2MAUtAlCHAIUfllECIS. IN:. Ot!A l',HA. I 2018369 I 07•30'21 1'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

COP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
Farmhouse
Color Scheme #1
PLAN 1
Front Elevations

PLEASANT HILL, CA
EVARD
Craftsman
Color Scheme #3
o , • A3 8
Ir.ALE: l/4'~ 1'-ll'
~ 20211\11.UAM HE2MAIJIALCH AlnlllECTS, II'«:. 08A VMA. I 2018369 I 07-30~1

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ,...T.Q,~ --
11 ;i; l.
; .,__FL
;,.T.Q,P. -
I -
i ~i I , I
! J
: )
i.Ff,lLg.; l
T,!IB __
~
l.F,F ___ _
:..
$!'
T,Q.P, __
I
r--
1 I
~I..

I
.f,EfrQ.c.t

CDP PLEASANT
Hill, LLC
-- J.Q,Pr' i
i
__ _f.F ~] ~i ~J.f!J.Q,_C,{
flEAR
LEFT
f(IB __ _ I
I
; . .I
'"' I LFL. __ _ rO!. __
$!
... I
VM-11-~.
-- T.O?
~
_Fl: ..
__ __ _ T.D.P.
;
_£.FJJ.O.C.

T.J.P,
;;:
,_Fl, .JQJ', __
-
~
F,fJT.g,c.

PLAN 1
Exterior Lighting, Refer To Sheet CM1
Farmhouse Elevations
VARD

PLEASANT HILL, CA
Exterior Coli1rs & Materials:

COior Scheme #1
~ SW 7102 WIIHB Rour
□-· Trim
Sectional rolHlP Garage Door
_T,Q_J'l .cotor.n sw 7642 Pavestone
.. , .. 0m,
I
ti
I
J:tim:.n sw 1&&0 Earl Grev
___ fLL I,Q,Pf
I
Color #4 SW 2HII Rowcr!!lt Pmer
- FberCement Board & Batteo Sldi'lg
;I
{, I ~ SW 7069 Iron Ore I
I '
- Composlte Shuttars -+f-!.Jl'.JLC0 i
RIGHT .,.._ !Jllffl &dOMISllllDlomoldl "41C111lho,t/ cou ·1tm.sidi,g8Rl""""1-111oidtand1U'-..
t>mat>ftfror4-
Composition Shingle Roofing
---LP-P'""'
Fiber Cement Board & Batten Siding
Fiber Cement Window Trim
Composite Shutters
Metal Gutters & Downspouts
£.F, ! -- .l&P~,
Stucco
Insulated Dual-Glazed Vinyl
I;- Windows (white)
Stucco over Foam Window Trim
Fiberglass Front Door
.~FJ'!:l!.C , Sectional Roll-Up Garage Door
fROfil
o 2 • A4 8
~~ v•·~1·-{I'
4:>2021 WILUMHltZMAUIJ\lCH AR:HITECTS, IN:l. 08A WHA. I 2018369 I 07-30-21 WHA

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) 1 rT,Q!, __ I ·.1: ,.

I I -
I
i J
! ~1
ti i ;,! t,L __ ,._T.:9-!: __ _

I I '-I
$'!
I
r ··
I
I J,
i : ,LFfilQ,~.
t'T.,_Q!., __
I
J
... ,
i
lFf. __ _ ,....r_&.L __
!
!
,,./
!al
I J
I : . .,. •. F.F/f,Q.~.

CDP PLEASANT
HILL. LLC
__1,!1,P.T
.I
~--- _J _rilM;«-E-- ~- - .;_ __ J&Pl
REA~
LEFJ:
: ,:,.

J,
I
Jl..E11£.tj
~ I
~
_T.Q,P. __ _
Ff._
■ iu_1_i1 UL! t1 ·c1·
Exterior Colors & Materials·
COior SCheme #3
□~ ~~1Q2WhlleRour
Gable Siding Trim
56cfunal roll-\4) ~age Ooor
.cidl!c.Jl.3.
sw 7743 Mountain Road $1uCCO
T.&f, __ . --"- . " I
! h.. ~., - l.-· - ~ ,~• .... _ --.;-.1-;- :-,~ .-•;~,-~-=-11-1 -•---.■.-:;:. Tl :7··1 1• ~m .:. • ◄ ~.... - : " 1-- ~~I I•:.'· I .;_;. ,~•. ~ . lc:=·~· .. ~~-}!If. :.-. ----~- 0 • ~-=-,-~ '""; .- :· :_.:,..__;_ ='.-:_-/ .. -~i'~(IIJl 1E:{•;-~'.:-P .... ,.,·"- - 7-,..__J, ~-- .·_ -,:: ;· I~,·:-:- --JJ I SW 7069 fron Ore
Ftlerglass Front Door
F£l!.Q.!1,_
__JI!? . .,..

I
~1 I
! ____ .fq ___ ),Q?l
~1
i
I .• !J.fl.Of,.-1.
.;·. ·: :_.. .. /::, I :..'.1_jJ_ ,:.__.·. . . . _:-;;~. ~ - I I \- I~ I ~:- I J J.'.l · - ,,....,.. __ ~,, - I ---~- -• .... ~- _ -ll .._ f L.:.,. j --1111 ; '1-:•·• a· ~;;;__.__. __,.__ ■ ~-. ---: _ .. • ·..- a.:,!.,. .---~-~~~!!!!~., Corona,do Old Wortd ledge llgerfah • , .. :r.J!!. __
I
I
~
I
lFJ. __ _ rQ-~
I
I t,~
PLAN 1
Exterior Lighting,
Refer To Sheet CM1
RIGHT
f!\.Q!.JT
•-g~ &d-,,;pWIS" mEhN)-llolt(cd!>r
•ilm,sid~ SllCOOandaccenldelllilsonsldeaideMiclls to maldl ftml elev#ln ~ s: Composition Shingle Roofing
1--- --+- - lnsulated Dual-Glazed Vmyl
Windows (white)
..------ - Fiber Cement Window Trim
------Fiber Cement Lap Siding
----++-+-- Metal Gutters & Downspouts
Wood Outlooker
•~, -~- 1 ~!:~ Over foam Window Trim
- !II !', Fiberglass Front Door
Sectional Roll-Up Garage lklor
_. __ . _ .., Stone Veneer with Brick Cap
Craftsman Elevations
401 TAYLOR ROULF:VARD 2 4 A5 8
PLEASANT HILL, CA Sf.Al.£: t/4" - NI'
@2021 WILLIAM HEZMAI.HAU:HA!l:HllECIS, Ir«;, OBA WIIA. I 2018369 I 07-30-21

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

COP PLEASANT
HILL, llC
t
t
~
tr.,.
37'--fY
Second floor
1,437 SF
W-0"
~ ; 1 ~
t
~
PLAN 2
2,573 SF
~
t
4 Bdrm. I 4.5 Bath I Loft
Note: (Fannhouse) Floor Plan Shown OnlY

PLEASANT HILL, CA
:r
t:i
~
~
m
m
+---------+---~
IMNG
ROOM
='"
19'-0"
37'--fY
m
a ~
□ ~
L,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6'-0"
37'-0"
First Floor
1,136 SF
12'-0"
o 2 • A6 8
Sl:AIJ': l/4"• f'.fl'
\1:12021 WILUAM llcZMAI.HALCH A~lflTECHl, 11'1:. 011A WIIA, I 2018369 I 07•30-21 1 7.6.c
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

CDP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
Farmhouse
PLAN 2
Roof Plans

PLEASANT HILL, CA
~
VARD
..... l~:g
◄~ I ~►
N (!J
◄ ~ i w
I -~-
L__ "'V ------ -- -----
Craftsman
o 2 • A7 8
OOAI.E: 1/4' a NI'
.:> 2021 WILLIAM HElMAU!AlCH AR:IMll:CTS, IIIC. 08A w-lA. I 2018369 I 0/·30-21

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

COP PLEASANT

HILL LLC
Farmhouse
Color Scheme #2
PLAN 2
Front Elevations
EVARD

PLEASANT HILL, CA
craftsman
Color Scheme #4
o 2 4 AB 8
S:Al.f: 1/4• o l'-ll'
0:.2(Y.IIV..LUAMHmlAUIAI.CftA~f8TECIS,tN;, IJ8Av.tlA. I 2018369 f 07~1

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ..
-,.-TJU: __
I
I ~I l
ri, I
I;! Lfl,_ __ r,ll,!', __ _
I 1 1. I I
,. ,l_FJ,'.!,Q.C,_ 1
i
.T.gf,
~ I
LF,!',...
,..T.Q.~.

I
~1
-I
I
--
4£.a.o.c._
11 pl
''I r,
!!1 It __ _

COP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
REAR
II !lJ
~JET
_ __ Ll!l-
';
__ .....!J,
.lJ!-P,
--7 ~
I
.,
i
-~-!'J.T.O,C.....
✓----- · .. --,
--------~ lol I II [1J
a = : 11 :

JI [l' I II I +-- -- -- +-
fJU: __
J
'"I
I '!o-FL __ (g_
I
I ~,
I
LF,NT,O.C, _
_,_!Jl!'._,.
~ i
.JL,i.

T.Q!,~
~ -1
..l!JTMl
~
~I
T.,Q!, -
_F.~-- ---
T.0,.P,
Ffili!-L
PLAN 2
Exterior Lighting, Reier
To SheetCM1
Farmhouse Elevations
401 TAYLOR BOULF:VARD

PLEASANT HILL, CA
RIGHT
FRONT
_ _ _!£P.
t
_ _ _ff._
_ __ l.!!.Pc
--,. --7 - 'i j; I !!, , I
.;.

I
~f.f/lO~_
Exterior Colors ~ Materials:

Color Scheme #
□
~ SWWil High ReffacU)IB While
Filer Cement Board & Rattan Skiing Stucoo D f.."" .... ,. •• .&nlt!r..L3 sw 2848 RoycroO Pewter Fib~assFrontOoor
C:01!l'OSileShulhlfs
SW 7069 Iron Ore FasGla
Sectional 1011,._, Gafage Door
'""'1alg...,. &d-<UIStJ m;tdi ldl•••nll,ndYcdor
'lim,sidilg. UIOCDandata1111delail••••do .. dlUI' elNti<lnstomakllfnlt-n - - ---------Composition Shingle Roofing
~--- - ---Fiber Cement Board & Batten Skiing
.. .!:9-~:..
~
Insulated Dual-Glazed Vinyl
Windows (white) I I II~ l Fiber Cement Wmdow Trim
11 ___ f!. Metal Gutters & Downspouts
T,O.P.

I • II ~I ~;~:site Shutters ~---4.J-. ----=-:i.... --Fiberglass Front Door Stucco OVer Foam Window Trim
I, 11 __!.l'fl...JlJl. I Sectional Roll-Up Garage Door
o 2 • A9 8
OOM..E: V4' = N1'
C 2021 WILLIAM HCZMALHAlCH AR:Hlll:CTS. 11\C. DllA ~ - I 2018369 I 07•30,21

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) r
I
I
I
I ,....T.,QJ', __
I i f
: i
I:.: I "'I
i:
:,.1 ~! ,._FL
,,_rM~-
I
~
I
I i L ~.F.fll,Q
.C
[TAf.
!
;;;i
I
,t_F,f,_ ~-T.Q.~--
-
I
I
... i:
i
~C.-

CDP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
REAR
r
~~FI
__.1!!,_P~
! ~, I
___ rIJ ~-1
- : , if{JJ.t!,_d
T''-- ~,
I
.j,_FL fJJJ'.:=
~
G111.o.1;., ___ w,_,.
;.I
o\!
I
__!L~
--_!,!!,P.r
;!
i
,,_r,01, __
I
I
~I I
I
I
,j...ft_
lT.O.P., __ _
I
I
ti
L~
PLAN 2
IanJ LJL
RIGHT
- . I
.. -, :
]t:I Ill
__ .LQ!.
.::1
___ £!. __ w ,_
l :;-
ff/lOC
Exleri~ Colors & Materials:

COior heme #4
~ SW7102WhlleRour
□ Trim Gable Siding
□ :.!."' ·-, ...
.cmarn
SW 7048 Urbane Bronze Fascia
fberglass fi'ont Door
sectbnal rol~~ Garage Door
~
Antique Cream • Counlry Rim~e
---
BrlcllCap ~
aiatlm;tm • New England
•Me1a1 o.-m & d-<ll!s r, maid! adjacent body cdor
•ifm.lidilQ. st11=atvlacant~lson~dt.ir,d,....
..._,,tomatdlhmtetovaiOn
~------Fiber Cement Board & Batten Skiing ~
ro.P. Wood Outlooker
Insulated Dual-Glazed Vinyl Windows (white)
Fiber Cement Window Trim
Fiber Cement Shingle Siding
J.Q._P.
1 Composition Shingle Roofing
l . · Metal Gutters & Downspouts
ll.

T • ==a:~-T•n ,.::;::: =.. L . Sectional Roll-Up Garage Door · - · - --· Stone Veneer with Brick Cap
r--___::~ ~--
1,t -· -----(II~---Jffl
J&; .~11 1--• --
·----- Exterior Lighting, Refer
ToSheetCM1
FRONT
Craftsman Elevations
D

PLEASANT HILL, CA
A10 0 2 4 8
SCALE: l/4'~ 1'--0'
@2021 WILLIAM I1£ZMAUIALGH AlllH11T:CTS, 11'£. OBA 1/IHA, I 2018369 I 01·30-'!1

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

CDP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
t
I
t
~
1f-V
'31'-a'
7•-f,•
'31'-a'
Second Floor
1,509 SF
~o~
18'-0"
~
; 1 ~
t
2 PLAN 3
3,015 SF
~
t
~
~
~
y
....
2,772 SF (House) + 243 SF (ADU)
37'-()"
m ~
m
IMNGI ROOM @@: !!H!l§ 1 ~ :o-u a :"a.I, r .-.,.,,..r "i~1...- m
,,~V° / lf'fF7', ·~; . 1/ - J, I 1 · '
19'-<J"
'P'-()"
8r.fil..E!Qru"
1,136SF
6'-0" 12'-o"
L,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3 Bdrm. I 4.5 Bath I Loft I Bonus room/ Opt. Bdrm. I 1 Bdrm./ 1 Bath ADU Note: (Farmhouse) Floor Plan Shown Only
401 VARD

PLEASANT HILL, CA
A11 0 2 4 8
9JAU:: 1/4' = NI'
©2021 l'AIIJMOtl"lMAUIAWHA~HlTECTS, II«:. OBA Wlb\. I 2011tl69 I 07•» -21 •
WHA

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

CDP PLEASANT
HILL. LLC
..
7'
~
b
it
; ►
! '
ti=
:t
1 ..

I
BONUS/

FUXSPACE
~~~1•
I
37'-{f' - -
37'-{f'
Third Floor
370 SF
7 0 8Alll4
llN ::::- ~
I cJ
I r"
~
I
...
·' C!2
i
ti=
ta
l
.

I'
~ i
PLAN 3
3,015 SF
1 7'
f!J
b
it
I
I ; . ,..
t::
.!
:t
..

I
2,772 SF (House) + 243 SF (ADU)
l==:i
--i:rRM~
till ~ 12.fil
I
,»--,, 37'-{f'
C
-~-
~ OM
) I
37'-{f'
Optional Bedroom 4 at
Bonus Room
1 :;
BA1H4 0 ::rcsc.

I C
=~
., l
3 Bdrm. I 4.5 Bath I Loft I Bonus room/ Opt. Bdrm. I 1 Bdrm./ 1 Bath ADU Note: (Fannhouse) Floor Plan Shown Only
401 A12 0 ~ 4 8
PLEASANT HILL, CA !ICAU: 1./4' .. 1'-(I'
0 2021 WILLIAM HEZMAl./iAI.CHAR:H1lECTS, IN:. 09A \'otlA I 2018369 I Ol-»21 .
...
·' C!2
i
~ i
ti=
ta
.

WHA.

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •

CDP PLEASANT
Hill, LLC
r1L---------------------------------------------'7 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~----------- ---------------------------------~ : ..dlb.. : 1 6:12 I I l
l RIDGE :

I
I
I
i 6:12 I I .. I
L------------------------------------------~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I "' l
I
Farmhouse
401 TA
PLAN 3
Roof Plans

PLEASANT HILL, CA
~L __ _ ! I ------- -------- -- ------- ---
1 I
I
I
I
I
I I I
i ------------ ~ -- _______ _________ j ~--------
I .,, : I
B!!lGf : I
I
I
I , ,12 I l ___ ________________ ~ ------- --------4 I
i
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I ~► ~--------;.J I
I li lfljl " I I I i r&t--------4-----
I 3.5:12
L_ "'IUJ" ------- - ------
craftsman
o 2 • A13 8
S:Al.f: 1W~Nl'
02021 WILUAM HEZMALHALCH AR:HllECTS, lt.C. OBA Vtt!A. I 2018369 I 07-30-21

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

CDP PLEASANT
Hill, LLC
Farmhouse
Color Scheme #1
l:..Q& -
PLAN 3
Front Elevations
VARD

PLEASANT HILL, CA
craftsman
Color Scheme #3
,, ! :1 • ~1 • r . ..i.. ,,~., 1'!, ,
A14 0 2 4 8
SCM.E: 114'• 1'-ll' WHA f2 2021 I\ILUAM HtZMAUiAlCH A~TS. It£. 08A ~- I 2018369 I 07-30-21 ORAHQE" COUNTY. lM A.MQJ'i.EI, U..V AR£A

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ..
[
ii ~[ T'--0.P. _ _
FL
T.O,P. -
52,
FfilC!-!1,
ilf \.')>":----:;.,- _,..
1 ,WM,
I ~1 I
I t~.F,..
,,._T,&.f. __ _
I
I
I
I
~I -I
I
~C.-

CDP PLEASANT
Hill, LLC
REAR
LEFT
__J.0.!1'
I
;,i;
_...11,_,!, ~']
;i
~!. I
! I
i!.f./U),_C,_.I,
1' T.QP, _
l
.. l 4 ,
I
I
,i._FL
~T_O,!'. _
I -
!
I
~i
I
I
! {_,f.F.IT,Q,L
;t!i!
_,.,ij
~,
_JJJ
_!-1!!-._
~
.,.._T~---
~
.I.J.F._
,._.T,OP
I -
i
',I
~-
I
I
i.FJ:JJ,C!-L
PLAN 3
Farmhouse Elevations

PLEASANT HILL, CA
Exterior Lighting, Refer
ToSheetCM1
RIGHT
U;!
__ _:~..,.
'1
--4 I
!
~i
I
___ rd - L!J,P1
j . ia1
-- i
t i :~~@,q
Extert~r Colors ~ Materials:

Color cheme#
Cmc.fl. ~~Q2Wblla Bour
Ttin
Secdonal rdH~ Garage OoaCtl.lllI.n SW 7642 Pavai;tona
-"'-""' Co.lou!3. SW 7660 Earl Grey stucco SW 2848 RoycroH Pewter Fiber Cement Board & Bal1an Siding SW 7069 Iron Ore Composlte Shutters
-aliJllll!S&dowllll)Qlf8'1m&hadJat,llllb~cd!lr
°Tm,,slra,g,aulCOIAdteOilllldllaJsa,ultandrur
elo-lllion, '1matnlmnte1Mlim!
----Composition Shingle Roofing
====r Fiber Cement Boan! & Batten Siding
i------Fiber Cement Window Trim
i---- --Insulated Dual-Glazed Vinyl
Windows (white)
--~ --Metal Gutters & Downspouts
---- -Stucoo
II~ I Composite Shutters
[]
1 ~ 1 Fiberglass Front Door
~- I Stucco Over Foam Window Trim
1~ Sectional Roll-Up Garage Door
FRONT
A15 0 2 4 8
SCM.I.: V4" ., 1'-0' WHA <!!>2021 WILUN,1 liEZMAlHAlCHAR:HllECTS, ll>C. 08A Vtm. I 2018369 I 07-30-21

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ~ T.O.J',__
~
II r•-- i!I LL __
r I
I
i
I
i Fli!,(!.;_i
;§I 1r- '\r4p"
I
.I
~
i
i
i_fl,,_ ..,_TOP- , -
I
I
~1
l il C.. I - ,
1 .. ,. __ :g_- e-1-e-m--1.;.1 .. fi .. '-.. ~·i·l--i1 '-"'• _,. • .., "9u• •••• ... •....,•••"1(1 ......,~.,~-·~.. -=•--.9 ••..... •-••.II.••• ·,.l··-•I· -~·•-t··l•J-·I--~ .. .. flC:• ,; ... • "•-'4 -,9. ··I·-· .......... ... · ·I . .. .. .. .. - - -- .. . .. -.. . . ..... -...... _. -.. -. ' -- - -- - ...... ~ .. -''- - ·- •-·-·· _, .•• ••'•4· . .. ·--- ··••-'• Ill lRf
[I]
l1~•r--• I°'- • ':::x : ::, - • uJ -n:;:. =rf~. -, -, - . i . -- y;_.;;--, a---■~ I
~-- . •J•1 ;r~-~- ~ ~\IB Em-a=E~11M
i Fi.,.;::iw ·:·,. 11 ~.:-- - _:.. __ j _-=~-.. ,: . ..,-;, I J .. . J ·. ~~ f. 1 l~-=-- - 1,-, 1;;_=4iti ~·~l .;, __ ·~=-~-- ~....,.... .ra- , • ..._~ .. :: · •!J .. ._.-; ll_tl';:;,,,, .•:-:-~~- ■ ' ~.~ .. , __ . - - .... ;;;11,._ ,,_~'.').~ - REAR
IJl:T

COP PLEASANT
HILL, llC
__ j&P'-"
~I
__ -1!~,l
__ _ w.1
·I - -}
~-tJJ\Ml.l
f_JIB __
i
ij;:

I
I
,l,JL _
f '9.P._=
I
ii -1
I
lF.~l!-~-
;.11;1
T.OP ,
Ff ' _ _ lQ.P~
I
~ ~I £.FJ!._O.p,j_
~1.0.r. __
,._,
'"!
,l..Ff. t"'--
~i
I
.;..f.f/!..O,.g._
PLAN 3
Craftsman Elevations

PLEASANT HILL, CA
Exterior Lighting, Refer
To SheetCMl
VARD
fl~Hl
tR9_l'~I
;;;j
i _ _ __!!~
____ J.!IJ'~l
. l i '-! t.J
Exlerior Colors ~ Materials:

Color scheme#
□~ ~.:.roz White Aour
Gable Sidill!I Trin
Sectima1 rol~up Garage Ooa
~
sw 7743 Mountain Road Stucco
sw 70091nm Ore
Rl)argtassfrontOoor
Tiger
~
Falls - Old World Ledge
~
Brown Blend • Clinker
'Mffll~& dowflSl)c.lUlsti ma~hadi,.:.,tbodycalOr
"Tmi.allioa.atuccoandilCCOlltdlu'-on<ldeand-
..,..aton,timaa:hllDnt....-
Composition Shingle Roofmg
.. - Wood Outlooker
1------- Rber Cement Window Trim
1------
1 -Fiber Cement Shingle Siding
_ _ _ .. .,..
1 - Insulated Dual-Glazed Vinyl
Windows (white)
>---- - --Metal Gutters & Downspouts
Stucco
ti_\-;- . . Stucco Over Foam Window Trim
~ ;
1 Fiberglass Front Door
t--------Sectional RolJ..Up Garage Door
r JM&,.cJ Stone Veneer with Brick Cap
A16 2 4 8
!.,AIJ-1W • II.-O'
~ 2021 WWMI HEZMAlHAlCH A~HilECIS. IM:. 08A \'MA. I 2018369 I 07-~ ,21 WHA.

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

CDP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
Farmhouse Elevations
Manufacturer: Sea Gull Lighting
Product Name: Fredricksburg Collection
(Small One Light Outdoor Wall Lantern)
Product Number: 854TT01-04
Finish: Satin Aluminum Finish
Dimensions: W: 10" H 1115/16"
Craftsman Elevations
Manufacturer: Sea Gull Lighting
Product Name: Medford Lakes Collection
(One Light Outdoor Wall Lantern)
Product Number: 88880-51
Finish: Statuary Bronze Finish, Etched
Hammered with light Amber Glass
Dimensions: W: 7" H 11 •

LIGHTING FIXTURES
401 TAY~ Ofl BOULEVARD CM1
PLEASANT HILL, CA C 2021 IW.UMI HeiMAI.HAI.CH AA'.:lltlEC~. lrt:. 08A .m.\. I 2011D69 I 07-30,,?1 WHA.

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ROOF MATERIAL:

Composition
Shingle
Coastal Slate
By GAF
COLOR#1
SW7102
White Flour
COLOR#2
SW7642
Paves1Dne
COLOR#3
SW7660
Earl Grey
COLOR #4
'.,'¥/ 2848
Roycmft Pewter
COLOR#S
SW7069
Iron Ore

CDP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC

FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS
ROOF MATERIAL:

Composition
Shingle
Coastal Slate
By GAF
COLOR#1
SWn57
High Reflective
White
COLOR#2
SW7649
Silverplale
COLOR#3
SW2848
Roycmft Pewter
COLOR#4
SW7069
lmnOre

FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS
2 lllOF MATERIAL:

ComposltiOn
Shingle
Charcoal
ByGAF
COLOR#1
SW7102
WhneRour
COLOR#2
SW"/743
Mountain Roell
COLOR#3
SW2846
Raycroft
Bmn211 Gnien
COLOR #4
SW7069
Iron Ore
BRICK CAP:

Coronado
Brown Blend
Clinker
STONE:

Coronado
Tiger falls
Oki IM>rfd Ledge

EXTERIOR COLOR & MATERIALS
401 TAYLOR ROULEVARD

PLEASANT HILL, CA

CRAFTSMAN ELEVATIONS
3 ROOF MATERIAL:

Composition
Shingle
Charcoal
ByGAf
COLOR #1
SW7102
Whne Flow
COLOR#2
SW77'JfJ
Garden Sage
COLOR#3
SW7060
Attitllde Gray
COLOR #4
5W7048
Urbane Bronze
BRICK CAP:

Coronado
Charleston
New England
STONE:

Coronado
Antique Creilll
Country Rubble

CRAFTSMAN ELEVATIONS
4 1~1 ~ .. ~-.r ~ '/ \ ~.:

CM2
«:12021 'MLUAM HflMAUIAtCH AACHllECTS, tt.C. 08A WIIA. I 2018369 I 07•30-21

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) •
·-· .. -- ···--·-· Rool111: CampoSIIIOn Shilgle
Vlo,tWl!ldo•/factoryff,i/sh/
Gallen I DoWlllpOII&
Colar#1
Color#2
Colar"'3
~-Celor#S ..UlllilyOoon
oa .. ,, Do• ••••nlrip (fat;1ory /ilish)
-·-···- ···-·-·· .. -
Rool111: C1111posfflon ShilQI!
Vlrl,t Wbldo• (lacto,y finish)
'llenlll1cilred SIDH {l/4" Jolnl>)
'llfld:Cap
'Morllr @Slone 1111 Blick
GulllnAO.ns,01111
Calor#1
1,-, -- ... ·,· Celor#!
~~,n Cotor#4
01111,ooon
oa .. ,. Do. W•ll•nlrf1 (""'1ory Rrlsh)

CDP PLEASANT

HILL, LLC
Color Scheme #1
Farmhouse Elevations Only
--· 'Coasta Slate - Tmbeilne HD Aetlector Sefles
'(CR~ #0676-0131•>
v«lte
Mileh Adl!aut Coler
1102\!nltteAo..-
1642 Pa ... , ....
7660Em!Gl8Y
2848 Roycroft l'llWtef
1069 ton Ore
Maleh Adjacent Coler
Mllth Gsage Door Coler
Color Scheme #3
Craftsman Elevations Only
·-· Chwooal - Tlmbedhe HD fleftecll)r Sedes
'(CRRC #0676-0136>
-le flgerf111s
adWoddl.aljge
Brown81end
<llrller
Soft Mlle
MitchAdjaoel'IICClter
7102\!nllteRou-
'7743 MamtalnA:tad
".'846
Ro.emit R10nm Green
'T0691rnn0re
Maleh Adilatl'II Cola
Maleh G•oge Door Cola
m••11•1i11111•r CofQrK M119rhll
GAf Roollag: Corrc,o!litinn Slungle
Mlganl(orequa/) Vlllyl Whldow1 (fll<IP,Y finish!
Sher.vii Willans 111111 Oown1paull
S"81wln Wllians Calar#1
S"8rwln Wlltan• Color#2
Sherwin ¥.111,ms
Sherwil Wllln•
Slleiwln Willn•
Sherwin Wiliams G-1 Doer _r,,rwt, (faclortffnlllh)
TSO
.... ,....,,, ...... -··-~- ... ___ ...,_
6N Roallnt: Colll)oslfton Shl,ale
Mlganl/oraqua/) Vloyl Wfadan (faclory finish/
Caonado '111111 cl1red SIDH (1/4" JolnlB)
Ceron8do 'lrlcllClp
o,co 'Mart•@ Sien, nd 1111ct
Shem Willams o, .. ,.1oawn111 eta
Sherwb Willam• Color#!
ShorwilWlllans Calor#2
Sherwil Willams
Sherwil'Mllams
Sherwin Willam$
~-n Calor#4
UtllllyDoara
l8D o .. a, DoarW.tllorllrif ffactoryfin/shJ

EXTERIOR COLOR & MATERIALS
LEVARD

PLEASANT HILL, CA
Color Scheme #2
Farmhouse Elevations Only
Clllar
'CoaSll!I Slate - Tif!fleftile HO Reflector Seit• CRRC #0676-013la Wille
Mi!Ch Adjacent Cdor
17~-, Hitil RellocQW Wlite
/tl49Slverplate
2848 Roycll)ft l'ewter
'7069 ton an,
Maleh Adjacent Cdor
Maleh Gange OO<Jr Color
Color Scheme #4
Craftsman Elevations Only
- . Qlarcoal ·· ltnDllflne HO ReA'°'lrr Serie< '(CAIi: "11676-0136) Wille
AntiqueO>eam
Coullty I\Jbble
Ch .... to,,
New En~:c,d
Sol!Whlle
Malcll AdJocent Cdor
'II 02 WNto ~lnur
'7136 Garden saga
'1060 Allitule Gray
'I048 IJJ1)ano Brome
Match Adjacent Cdilr
Match Ga"aa• Door Color
CM3
@2021 WILLIAM HEZMAIJ-IAl.CH AR::HtlECTS, 11£. OBA MIA. I 201&'169 I 07M-21 M111lact••
GAF
Miganl(ore(1Jal)
ShirwtlWH:ims
SherwinWllams
SherwilWH:ams
SllerwlnWlf..,,.

Sherwi1Wllam1
S,,.WinWliams
TilO
__ ., _____
GAF
Mlpan! (or equal)
Coronado
Coronado
Oreo
Sll11Wi1Wllams
SherwlnWIIM\~
SherwilWDama
SllenvilWHams
SllirwlnWllams
Sh..-w1nwmrn,
TSO

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ~

RETAINING WAI I
PER CfVl l. ffl'IC'1\I
8'-0" TOTAi IIEIGIIT VIEW
FENCE AT RFT A l"IING W Al I.,
TYPICA i
CONCRFTF ORIVEWAY.
rYPl('.'\L
CONC'RFTI: 1-,:,..1 KY
WALK. TYPICAL
('UMMUNJTY MAILHOX ~r.1=. 017AII TlllS SII FCT
6'-0" VlEW rFN(T. n'Pl("AI
~ GRAPHIC SCALE

PATH AT

TAYLOR BOULEVARD
~ - M
(lffn7.T )
1 int'b - 30 n. CIVIL RETAINING WALL, TYP. _)
L .\NDSC:APF. ARCIIIT£crt,U:

I...AND PLA.,-.NrNG ~(,I~ IIO'CANZ>\ !oi;11nxr
~IJITTJl4
" 'Al "ltlffR[fJ{.C'\ M.'.%
1!1:. ·~~~\~~:
~
TAYLOR BOUL~VARD
PRELIMINARY TREE PALElTE ___ _ ~
--- aza WDIH 191NT ·= caMffl\'
-
P.STACIA C~INENSIS 'Kl.TH OA.VE"T'" CHlNE~f PISTACHE 24• AO:< 25-35' WIOU25-351 Htufi LOW OUERC\JS A<;RlfOL'.A COAST U,'! OAK l4" 81\X Z0•/0' W,Of/20-70' HIS>I LOW OUERCUS LOBATA v.,LLEY OAK 24' BOX 50 ·80' WIDE/50·80' tt:GH LOW &.,
l
/1, ,,
--
AR' )TU, 'MARIN.I/ MAll'';A lo\ADRONE 15 GALLON 40' Wl1E1 0•50' l'GU LOW M4:;NOt.lA '~T. MARY' SOJ:!IERH MAllNOUA z4• SOX Jl' Wl)t/Jll' IIIGII MtD f'AUNlrSCM':'LJN~A C.AROLl~A CHERRY LAUREl 44• BOX 25' WIO(l3<Y HIGtt AClC:Elff11EEJI
CERCIS oc,.o.:~TA:.IS WESTlRN W£0~UO 15 GALLON 2~·20' w,or,20-~0' e.GH M[~ LOCERSTROEM.A I. 'T~~CARORA' CRAPE M'IRTlE 15 GALLOli o5·I!!' W-0£/ZO •W HIGH LOW ;oTAL PROP~SEO TAEES
EXISTING TREE LEGEND:
,, ; ,~ 6'-0" WOOD FENCE, Ki I TYPICAL
-IIY. -- .,_ - ~..,.:!I' I
ii
:,
I• •~ POLELIGHT-
~I 1[, SEE SITE LIGHTING
1_ PLAN&DETAILA,
~ SHEETL8
2 'I
3'-6" GUARDRAIL AT

RETAINING WALL
,,
T . PREL£MINARY TREE,
I, . TYPICAL
I
I t-· TREoS ro 8E REMOVED 89
• TRfCS TO ~LMAIN 74
TREE MITIGATION:
-- 19) ◄' PROPOSED NATIVE 00 1-n:s
12) 15 GALLON NATIVE TREES
(46) 15 GALLON PRCPOSED T!lEES
;78! 24' BOX PRO?OSEO TREiS
------- 045) 15 GALLO~ 8 2<r eox

FENCE LEGEND
8VMIIOL FENCE TYPE
7B
47~ Uf 167 lXISTINGTRUS l'ROPOSED TO RDIA1N
• l'B) 15 GALLON PROPOSED TRElS
1'21 15 GALLON PRI.POSEO ~.!EES
• 146) 15 GALLON PROPOSED TREES
f56) 15 GALLr~ PROPOSED Tflf:ES
-------
' (2~) 15 GALLON PRO!'OSEO T9EES
■ • • • ■ 6'·0" "'GH W000 rENCE
8'·0" TOTA:. ·•~IGHT WOOD FFl'ICE ON R[TAINING WA•. c
6'·0" VIEW Ff.NCE
8'·0" fOTtL HDGHT VIE.W FENCO. ON RET~.'~ING WALL
~ 3 ·6' GUARJ _qAIL ON RCTA'NING WALL
27 ·~
J4
1~5
\._ 8'-0" TOTAL WOOD FENCE ON RETAINING - 6'-0" WOOD FENCE, fYPIC'AL
~ WALL. TYPIC' AL
---· EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYPICAL
f&i CATALYSTDEVELOPMENTPARTNERS N . Taylor Boulevard
Preliminary Landscape Site Plan Pleasant Hill California ------- July 28, 202 1 L_l

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ~ PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE
,_ ~-
w-
~~
~~ ~- ~~
~~
-
~- w- -~ ~~
~~
~~
~~
--
~- ffim ~-
m-
--- l,P.BUTUSY,AIII-~' URCIS CilN.bilfNSIS ,-DP:IESTP4.~/S'I'' C:EFICl~~ENSIS91UBYFALL$'
LAGERS'IB~DII.AL'lUSCl.f RA'
JLEJaEUR:lPAEA'NILStNII'
Pl'il.\Cl/1 CHltlEN':ilS'l<ErTH DA\'E'r' OUEP:'lls,t.Rsrou, "'9W<LC6m
4,Nl~'.:i//.i,tlH0S '8U5H PElRL'
All:BIJT1JSIJ,'OMPAi.;TA'
4R':10STJPHYL/"5'1f'WAPDM".Y,IMN'
BUDDL~ OAYUlll CJ5TU$" ~DUS omse1col.Ol
r,msmlDKIDES
EUONYII.U5J.''-flC.l\!JPHYLLUS'
EUfliYOPS P. \W\N::.t-n:1~
fEIJD.45ELL::.-Wl~'lO
FE~11XAV.AJREI'
uR£'11LLE,0 'YOELU'
~
~
~
~
~
-
Mafl.NA
--lr\i\OOONE
EASTERN ~IECIUC
WEEPING REDIUD CfiAPE~llf
ffiUITLESSOLU'.

CHNESE PlSTleHE C~STUW:OAk
V'llElO•K
t5GAU.ON
15G6.U.CN
24• = ~:~~= a:i~ 2'-"B)X
l<!'!DX
2'-'8'111'
DW~f P'INK KA~P.C.;J PAW I '6LLON
ti:tYPlifT !i.TRA'~ERRY TREE 5 G4U.v:~ t&\\JZANITA 5 G4l.L~N JIJTTERR.YIIJSH 5GAU.ON
Rt:~ !IGAU.m4 FaRTNIGHT LL! I 61U1N
~~u~~~MUS ~ ~}ii°o~ DW.tRFEUP.'fOPS l~L?Pl Pl'11:E,tiPPL.fliUA.''.I 5t;AU,ON t.fl.EENFES:UEGWS 56.ALL0N WO"ILY fiP.Ell'll.LEI. ~ Gl.l.LON PLAN2
~:

Tu:
~ WW
LOW

1.:)\1'
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
t:

LOW
LO'W
LCl'.11'
LOW
---~ ~m
~~
~~ ~- ~~ ~- ~~
~~
W™
u~ ~- ~~ ~-
~-
~~
~~
--
DITT •rn MM
m~
•=
--- ,11.JHCUS 'EU◄~ eLUt
JUNCUSPAl&i!S
F'llfllPHl~'IIA<-;£,PCPS<ICLt ~I~t,. i:J~Jlp~s1s L.Ofl'OPEUUJMCHl"[N:SE L.,lOPET.11,LJJMC:.'RAlZLEIERJP
UilOffTJIUJM'SllTU\"GPI«
MTITT\IS C. tJUl'At1A' NANDINAD.'~MPACT•'
tJ.\MDINA D. 'H/,RBOUR OWIIRP
"-EPET., FAA...SEt,t4II
OLEA E. 'LITTLE OLLIE'
PENMISETU• HA~ELN' PHOI\MIUM T. '»AO~I W'_.,,CE1t' Pll'>IU,W\l'SUl<fEI" PllUMJS '81<1GlfTB TIG!lf ~Ol.EPt$1. '8AU.EP.DU: RHAPHIOL£PIS:I, 'WHO'EErri.:HANTr,1:ESS' ~OSA'CECILl!:!fMlNl!:f!'
P:t)9ll'!~MJSOFftCINALIS
SOLL"'AHETl:ROPHYLLP
S'YR1NGAWLG.!.P.1'"-
lfl'LCSll.4C.'r.cMPA,;f1.'
·Ni.;cA~H1R£SklES'
l'LANl
~
IIUIEFIUSH li;.DLLO!II
CJLIFOl1'ila. ROSH I G6LL('~ DWil#lf'l'B.l.OWPO~ IG'iLL<I~ :~~1::~:AN4 ~ ~~~i CHl1::E'Sf FR.NOE l"L<IWER 5 GAU.C'",I flEDFRfNJEFLOWEP. 5G4IJ.'' N PN<~IHGfR.GWER 5GALLC'I
SW<llf MrmE 5 GAU.r.~ JWAAf HEl,'J[Nll' !"MBOO 5 G'.l.LC~ D·«Af1FHEA11DLYUMMU IGALLO-.'J: CATMI~ IGIILU"1 ~,
t'NAAF OLIVE ~ t,ALLON
DW.61lF FOl"ITAIN GRASF I <'lllt~ ~,(fl 1.EAI.Ja~ ftJ.X 5 GALLCN r•ARF NEW l£AL4ND FU:<. I Gld.LC~ BIUGHT 5 TIGHT ~fl !5 ~lLDN M>li,\HA'NTHQFU,j 18'1.LCM NDIA HI.KTHOfl"II ~ G.Al.L~N C:l!:CILEBl'!Ut\.~fll ltOSf ~ G,.LLDN ROSEM~Rl' !i UAllt~ B-LUE6ELLCREEPC~ IG41.LC.l COW".>NLILAC Si>4l.L( ..

CO~IPAC.T XYl.l"S\ttl. -' &o\Ll"" e.£.AkEC,BlUE'rtJCC.1 &GilllON ~
-
= =
~
-~
~ ~
=
= =
=
~
= --= =
BUD'DW,..

IAIDOIJ
JUN PAT 0
.AUHJllG
NEPFllll
~::
~
1-:/· .:;,j
c::=::=l
---IAISDOUG.LA.SIANA
JIJ'ICUIPAT[NS
BUODLEJ.li'GN~Y.6,Rl£TIE.:.• --:~:fre::i~~~o'!t~5
p~sTE,1r,HYBRIDS
$1".ACHYS ~l"r.
-IZLSEMlllfASEUPER'.'IRfNS
l•.a....FAO"l'EN"i.ntn~-l'All
l!Os.tBliriKSIAE
--DWARFOOlTERFLYBUSH
FAClf"E COASTIAIS
CALIFOIU~IA RUSH
~f=tS$
WDBtPENSTE¥0'!'4
I..Alll!l!!a.R
C.\ROLINA.IESSAMINE
""EllOWlFIUMFETVINE
LAC!Y!!MY.SAOSE
-·- .a,:::::roslAPHYLnS:It.'EY.ERAlDC:,0/UEr BEARBERRr l:;.titl,,Jl•l6"0,C.

MYOP~U~ PN\\'lfOlPN 16':LL~•36n0.C,
'.:.!i\£\1.:lL"i UAU~•EJ;LU:TEIW l~ll,c.',lt'.36"1.}.C, 'ifYOPOP.UM
~ lOLERO-SODDED :fFR~08..rAIUJ[GUS5
lW. P"f'StUETIIRf"
-~
~
~
~
~ \11
....
"'
POLELIGHTSEE LlGITTlNG

DETAIL, SHEETU
~
~
~
~
;' (
IGlll...L~
IGr.iU..l.ON
IGAU.CN
!§!!~
;:o {;.OLLON
; ::t~~
LOW
lO'II
1116H
~
lOW
t~:

Lo• -CMUIUl'a\'11--
fllLNff OTYI ~9,~

51.tt UNITS
H.J...15C!!MU..ONAND2-4"90X
1NB...U.l!IEST'""21>
~
~~~/ ~r,~~TN<e
"""R1i!11m< HOSE !Fl,._ bl H.'114 ,s,,I,. eALV. HIIIE lHSr, 4-Te~""= _.....,..-a.I.

PEA PLJrHTIN5' MarES
)
1-"-t-'-""::~:1~-f-~~W~~½1--r1-1---;-- 41~~~ GJ-~ (LL ~ --=-==~ =±==l====#===;,i=;,d~~~ 4=l::~~~JJJ=~~b ~ ~~~ - --- P(4N11NG ANO

GR'OUNDCOVER
!\REA, TYPICAL P'INleH
- 4'EMtTltMClll10

CONCRETH WALKPERCIVIL'S
IMPROVEMENT PLAN, 1YPICAL

GRAPHIC SCALE

CONCRETE ENTRY
WAI.K, TYPICAL-
~I; ,_ I/ ~ .,. 1 ~ - - _ , , :--7 !'ROPOSEDTREE ~ ~ I \.,j'\~ ,:~UK \ -'\· - " _).. ., __ ,,,,. , IREE, 1YPICAL- , ~ ·,. ". ~ . ' / SEE LAND. SCAPE · - ·· ~ -~ ~ -.ii'"-""'- '---.aF-- ~ PLAN SIIEOf LI ---~ ·-- ~-~ .. - ' ' '\ - CONCRETE DRIVE "'- PER CIVIL, 'JYPICAL
- · ARCHITECTURAL
PORCH

TYPICAL
-
-ll'OltM l'LNIT TA9U!l'9 ~ '"L>N'TIN5 t,IQffS
112~0!',..,.,,.,...U,
~Olll.,.,,.~~~-
ON9lff ltAQ:.'f"ILL
L ~GtJN'IRQ.... BNll:RJER PA)ilEl...!ii ~ EE REGLIIRED 144ERE "TREE!5 IS J,o,ll""n,IM Jo' Atl'JM PA~. R0oT soumoNS JltDC7T" ~at~~f"(A.1"!11:U!l:0,L.eteTttef"~TOK
G~oMTIS!.

TREE PLANTlNa AND BrMCINa DETAIL -.! , 112•, 11.0'
NOTES:

I. ALL TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AND STAKED PER CITY
STANDARDS.

2. lRfES BE PUNTED WITHIN $ Of HAROSCAPE ELEMENTS,

SHALL HAVE A LINEAR ROOT BARRIEFI INSTALLED
ADJACENT TO THE HAROSCAPE ELEMENT AT TIME OF TREE PLANTING.

3. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY'S CURRENT WATER-EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE. ~ o 20 i 4. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE AUTOMATICALLY IRRIGATED PER CITY STANDARDS. USING LOW-fLOW SPFIAY. BUBBLERS OFI DFIIP METHODS.

5. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED TO A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 3". ( "'n~ri 1111.t!ll - 10 tt

1..4.NDSCAPE ARCIUTECl'llllE

1..4.NDPLANNING
161SIIDNAtaAS11Ulffl
St.'l'l"H)I&
WAI.Nlff'Cllf2:X,('A0t'io116
'fML9219317ff1
, .... ~ - ,i,:,-r,C"Jr6
t8t CATALYST DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
Front Yard Typical
Landscape Plans
~ Taylor Boulevard
P I c a s a n t H i I I. C a l i f o r n i a
JULV28,202I L2

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) M
:
. '
j
I--
'I.
t ~tAl .Ar'PI.JGAlf~ 2",c.,f" ~ TOP l'tAIL. - CA90 AU. l!J)6.t9 I FLAT TCfl' %' 5QJAR£
P05T (.A f'05T) CR,----fl'O!,T ~ SffUIG,'IUtAl.. l:N&l~f'L.."N!& l?OI.JAL.AT9iMT

ANDEND'WN
~.=~ :: - !1192" &,,.J.V.-NJZl!l> '111'1: I i
---- ' t==-=-=J1 ~TOB&:5"ALYAHIZC!P,
t::::.-==--==--==--==-=ll :=1 -==--==--==-~~ _,-;=:::::11 =, ' I 2 . ~TS TO eB BL,AG,t";. P0H0ER C..OAlt::D
AL-UMIMUHOR~AI-..
~."°°"TO l!le GGN!ITPU:flON ~
~ - Gl!l>AA,Ol'lll'I!.
_.., tW,.1..-m:,,,t,tJLG~A'IALA!!U!
~ STA~ll:5- .'IJ66) 22&.fl!a6
-·:! ~~~L t'tN.SIOKIC.fTn?ICAL AT~ [:] "-'- - l""INl9H91Jf'F"'-CC ·•
TTAc;.H TO tl:l:T.AININ6 ~
- . - .,.,,._-- ~· fiU=TAir&'dN,lrLLF"al
· ,- 'PCT.•IL6•!UfC~Lat .AND GIVII,.. 04&1HEElll5
l'LAAS.
0 GUARDRAIL ON RETAININGI WALL ~ :.::: ...
"'"""'-"1Y
.---~Fill
49,c 4 1 PTF"OST- -
ii • &'<J"O.C.. .I
n- 2·:~~;.~ 11/t ";i &ALV.ANIZCP
.,., :>""4" 11tli 911'11"61"- --,,
1 - r1Hl5M6f<""O .,§~
......
r:;.1£'~\ ~l'X6' FC>ST~ ,~ 2"M" P09T ~. I
L -~Nt-;J' :2-91&0
__ 5GK:>. 20 _____!.Al.V,5Ttrl.-Po9"1
1T
I
ll I
'
F=
-
M
Cl'·-i;,i·
I 11 I ! I i I
I
i"J 17· h :~T
&~'"-"'N.

C,ONlle(;rlOII
-..J
/ , I f'i' I=~-~
j EN&INEB<
""llll?l'AIHlli. ,. "
ii
I
I
~------......, ,-- 2"•6" G.AP -
i -- . ~ ..... - ~~NeieJrl: ---
=======~~~F- I
''w: 4" PTl"0&1 - I ' (u · •&'-C"O&,, ~ 19 jl •t1,p+i . _ 2 •,a•no"""ctE/ .,
.:l;li!Lt\1,1]1li11l t'i;jJitll i: ~.:,,=,; I l Ji iii.I~'. l!t'. j,. j ' '·:.L .,.,... I, 1j'!.mii'li!I.: 1 :it·½ IHJ; 5,,.....,. ( ·1 't' Li-f· • •·t• n:U · rn 1,. i.artl;ii Jl-+~fiu:; ~ r "'"'"" ~ J'!; 1 Jrf /1] 1 t11 © VIEW FENCE O<:Ale,ltl'
·~c:---{: ?i
';'~~- -;:~,: ~-~·1 '
,;-• 2' X 6° G,,,.,, D·-o··ac,,, ,.,,,,., ..,_..__Pl
/ --·!~~iL.Ett-- \ ,~
i I; I l"X4'Nl\lt.ER,-~
1r i I -.A.TBAC.f<
-11"61 M!HGIN6 -
I 1 1 1.r (90,4,w ON SOARP
I I ,4""6"PGeT_____., I • &'O.C.
~;~~
· :2"M"t,,l,IJU?ft
l l I • :~~T >--\ eom>H ..... ~
"""""l<IGl<ear ; II, i I
1 I 'I I 11 I 11
n 'l I 11 I
I I 11 I r I
I I

I I I I
~ ci:Nrt-i'!:C> --- J I"
' = 2'
tz1"
I~
~-=- (-1'"6' "°"T «M:-;-7 2·,w•POST~ I
L . :.,,:" N/ TISl<;J _.=t-9/&''!G-Ht>.20
/
I
__ ~,.._~ P~T
2"><.4"GAf'NI
C>."1)0 tO REGEl'il'E
/. L_,, eoM<D5 \
-- l')a"NAJl-,ER -
~PIDNr• ,~
I ;f' ' l'>Cb'fll!NGINl!io- I ;, (ESOAAOON!IO~ I
-:•~~~T . -· 9 I
.. jl: l"KrMA.11,...ER
--~~' !1 I :1'>"4' 9tli v i , BOTTOM RAIL
2'><a" k1""80ARO l , .,~~ "'" al~ - -.. I ii l"J
eAAc:,l:J!T c.oHNl!(;T1c>N ' I PfR.SfllWG.'T\RAi. l I ~f"$- TO eE ~ fftt! ... lEI:) 0006 f'lt. -- " ALL NoQD TO BE coN5TFIUC.Tl'1N 6RADE t<,._1<£T,.IIIINOo I ,L-- ~""'°°"' Ofi. G,fpAfl, ~ ()~!!,f -~~;tk:::» _/ NO'Tt:CJ. ~t'i,t.=. / © i 1 -- ON RETAINING WALL
~
® WOOD FENCE WIKICICEAIIOMD S<A!.£, •l• 0 fl.fl HIGH WOOD FENCE E ON RETAINING WALL ~ 112"•1'-0'
,....,.
\1
I
~P"l>-
..-..e1e=
ru~~\ !~( .? \ ...,;:;,:,,. •• , .... )
·'< ·:;' ·. ~-,;_,;· jlt( -~_/ ,~.,- - __ ; __ , "'"""i' p,1 .f.'-<>'.
® METAL BENCH ~112'•1'-0"
I.ANPSl:APE ARCIIIT£Cl1JRE
LAND Pl.llNNING
161JBONANZ4ST11t:£T
lllffEl1o1
WALNlft'cm;K,Cifl-tit"'6
m.·tu.mn,-, PAX: ffl.9:)Q,61&
FRONf ELEVATION BIDE EUNATION
0 DOMMUNITY MAIL80XE8
u,,., .... n
,.-.... --;:f- ... ,.... J
1-· i
j
-t
l
la CATALYSTDEVELOPMENTPARTNERS M
Preliminary Landscape Site Details
DOS Domus Small
Urban Lumfnalre
UiJ;Jllllh\ ...... """'1ui~tl9rt.l05
~'"'''"" ,,...,,,~··:- "':';:"'" -~·:::;:::-;- ~: ·...:. -.:!.... l> .. ::-.•~f:.• 1 .., ... re'
. - I')* 7
i 'i77 ~~1· .&
-- 'lol-1.
~
..... ":"".~~t
\V ~D08
Tf£ 12' POLE LIGHT OCCURS ALONG THE PRIVATE ENTRY "A".

FIXTURES 'A' 8 'Al' WILL APPEAR THE SAM[, INTERNALLY

THERE WILL BE UNIQUE LENS THAT WILL CAST THE LIGHT
DIFFERENTLY. FIXTURE COLOR TO BE 'TEXTURED BLACK Bl<TX'.

THERE WILL BE 18) DOMUS POLE LIGHTS IN TOTAL.

Taylor Boulevard
P I e a s a n t H i I I, C a 1 i f o r n i a
JUL V 28, 2021 L3

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) t.i¢ ~

PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE
--
ARB 'MAIi'
CER ff.' LA.C.'TUS'
1'tiG'$.\,,'
~~/~ QUEAGR
QIJfLO!
I.RBUTU5 'MARlt~A'
r,ERCIS CAt~ADE."fSbi 'FOFIEST P~NSY'
LAQ:J15Tll.Of¥1A 1TI.ISCARDRA Mt.3N0LIA'ST, MIIRY'S'
PIST.ICIACHlhlENSIS"t:EITHO.\VE't'
PRUNIJSC.611.!l • .ltlAtU.

OOERMAGll!FOUA
OOERCUS.LC!!.IITA
--
MARINA MAOR0;'4E

EASTERIIREDBUD
WHITE (flAPE i.rtfllLE MI..G>.::ui
CIIINESEPIW.atE
Ca'fl.OUlfAotEM'll.M.IREL
ei~~l::,cOI«
l~GALL''l-)J
15 GALLC~ 15GiALLCI,\!
::.◄ "BOX
~4• BOX
2"'BOX
Z.l'BOX
2'1"BUX
L~·'W
MED
LOW
MED
~
t:
-
BUD •oa\,' JUNPAT
-----
BUIJDLEJA'OA\!mn'
JUt;.l.lSPdTEN$
- --
BUn£P:fL'l'8USH
CAUfnP~IA RUSH
&GALLON
\GALL.ON
181"
---
LOW
HIGH
IHIILU f,' '- ~<-1
j ;: ,. / •.:;j
p, ,,_'./ 1
l:;·~x<' .-1
dl!CTOSTtPH'flJiS lf'/A-URSI fl ltE'YES' l(.AI_LON•31S1 0.i:.

A~I 'B.P.' ANl:WZ,OffH?$ 'BIJSH PEAJTL' owAAr Pl~K MNi;AP.'JO Pi\'A' I GALLC''t LOW ARC'LE,' ,alR:;T')SlAPHYLC"S'LOIS El:i\1UND!1 LOISEDMUNDSM.&'JZA,,.11.ei l;,G,b,I_LON LOW BUll'DP.V BllDDUADltVIDII BUTT~LYBU.'SH Sr.at.LON LOW BUI> 'P.H.' BUO-Dt£.IA 'PURPLE H42E' DWt.Rf 8UTTERFL't BUSH & G.OI...LON LOW Ch, HYI OSM H'18ftaOUS ROCkEtC.JE 5 Gtt..LON LOW FElstl R:u:>A~L0wt41(A Plkf-'PPLl!:WAYA 5GOU.1ff Lm'I FES'M4r FESTIJCA'w.lREr SREENFESCUEWSS 5G41..LO?l L"M JUN •~.i,.• JUfi.'.:US 'fl!l'S OLU(' BLUf P,USN 1 (;.ALLC ·~ LO'°I JUN PAT JUNCUS uroo ".:ALIFOP~IA RUSH I Gi!illfl:. LOW ~:1 'N.P.' V,\fOPHIA VAA:i,O paps=1clf' OWAAf 'Yfl.LC'W P(l~Efl I GALLO"!! LOW uu 'VON' U.URUS NOBILI~, 'MON'R:ICk' 5WEa 8AT umE RA.tit>' es G.4LLON LC'l"fl lJtV Mi\R LAw'41ER4 M•RmMA TREE MAU 'lW 6 GrALL,Otl LllW LC¥'Bf![' Ul.\lAN>fl.di'U.fElE' W.Tl\t.lSH lli,lLU.::( LOW ~
m FU )!f][U. F~ "-4T:¥1NT I G.!ut", LOii!'
~ ~I, ~srg: =rrl":C:.ir«' ~~"'BEDf:~= I ~:th~ t: ~ PHO 'U.M.' PHoJR'AllN 'NA~I MAIDE~' HEW ZEo\lJIND Fl,6;( 5 ~L,ON L'JW f fHfl. 'P $' PHORVII.IV; 'PINk STRIPE' r,EW .ZEALAND FW l- Gi4LLOtl LOW ASARUMC4UDATl™
IGALLOM•J6'-C.C.

CAAD ~MJLS.t
I G41.L<~ • 2"' o.c.

MTURf.JADOUGLASII
I GALLON• 2t."O::.
flMTCAWM' __ _
Pl,..>,HTQTYIPI.Nff~nea.. 51ZE UNIT5
/~-· ~ . ,_..._ ::::;.::: =----~ =-=r-r . I·- . //;';, ___..,_ ---=-:\ -- I .' - . - (_,_'/-7",;g: _ - : ":;: . :- .. <, C -..-. </l~_J"~-~ .. ~~Ji{i ;L ·• · · · · -~~•-/k;;;; Z2· 5 ~ '&,:c)~""."-~4'. :h~•~1 ''ci1'"-<fji.-' ./RJt~-- ., { • ,;,:: • c } ·:; -:r----~,--t -~---_---_:_- --- _. T'~t --;77~y. ~ "-~ ~-.:::~ ---~~ -c,.{ ~---'=-- c;_!,_ 7=.,_.,;f. ..:. -~--...- • _.,;,, -:._::1.1 :-:. ·::'::.ar ~')(-
-· - \
~ -· :------r ~ WY \=· 11 ~II "'"' . 111 , •
~ / ~ //

GRAPHIC
~ SCALE
NOTES:

I. ALL TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AND S1AKED PER CITY STANDARDS.

2. TREES BE PLANTED WITHIN 3' Of HARDSCilPE ELEMEN'TS, SHALL HAVE A LINEAR ROOT BARRIER INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE HARDSCAPE ELEMEN1 AT TIME OF TREE PLANTING. 3. LA~DSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY'S CURRENT ll'ATER·EFflCIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE.
~ ,/ /
~'/ /~
I
~1,L;'
~
~
.,,.~ ....

WILD GINGER
'fERB&BUEM._
•ED
LOW
~
~
~
-----~
---~
------~
-~
-· ~
--ril"'"""'-
-~
~
~
~
~
I 1)11 1·1 , I-Ai\
~
'--i~ -r
~ o •o j

4. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE AUTOMATICALLY IRRIGATED PER CITY STANDARDS. USING LOW-FLOW SPRAY. BUBBLER$ OR DRIP METHODS.

5. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3''. (Il"l<H) l 11ltlh- 20 ft.
uNDSCAPE ARwrrrcruu UNDPIANNING :.e-::Kl-,\maT
:1~~~CAtf"6
PAX: ,:t'll.9311'05
l2l CATALYST DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS l8t
Buffer Planting - Taylor Boulevard
Taylor Boulevard
P I e a s a n t H i 1 I. C a I i f o r n i a
JULY28,2021 L4

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) 18t
~ GRAPHIC SCALE
~ j (lll'ftJ:I)
1 iath- 30 ft.

I.ANl>SCAPE A.ACHIT!(TIJRE
k\l"PftANNING
l6URO'.N1\N'I.A.8l1Eb,-
8unf!J)•
WAI..NUfCIW.1!1'.CA~M Tt-.1.· ~1-n,tTf'fl
,11.X m 9lfMl!i
~
---l'A-¥:WR-BOl-fbE-\LARD
a CATALYST DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
"°;'"Jr'..:;>
~v ( -~I
""' \, ll
\ ~~_;,I
~
\
\ 1,
\I
'~ •, ,-,\
f '.I,
ff (
1j
I
ii
1r
'I I~ ~Q
~ 1,- t:3 1:
~ ~ ~~
i' ! 'II I :-- -(--,t , I ,
I i-----1
i,
11 ,,
Ii
II
·I
•I
'I Ii 11
Iii
1i
Ii
Preliminary Hydrozone Plan & Irrigation Calculations

LANDSCAPE HYDROZONE LEGEND
c=:J
c==J
c==i
EE2I
c=i
ZrNEA;57,1!10250n
COMMON UIE&~t MORNIVG SU~ 10 ~~(;~·"~~: "'TBIIJSE,
Zf.'NE B1 e:,20~ ~o FT
e1onE.TENflO-,J Pl.>NTING WrTH ~P.IP
EMlmRS.MEDIU•w•TERUSE
Z0HEC!lt.,!13Con

1..')Ml,fflNlaAEASIP.AflTIALnFIJlL
SUN,0AOO&ttrTQlfllt.NT,uvn~
l'IITH DRIP EwrlE!tS. LOW WATER USE.

ZONE0r896SQFT
LOl'iSTREET'ffl[f5Ari&ACCM
rnEr;W1rHmDMOU!L8le8LERS
lOtlE&l9S'JrT
MEOflJ~1 STREIT TREES AA'D- ACCE"ll' TP.EE!i 1111TH hDt~fflUAL Bl..B8L£RS WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS:

LCWW"1ERUS[PLl'illl\.li~ ., 81.SfSf
NENIIM WAIFB ltsf pt UIIS ff A • 6 JQ SF P>TALPU,WTIN&ME.!i -=87,9ltlSF ESJIUAJEPTQTAlWAJFBIISE
: lll'l.2) ,: (0_62) X 1~3, X 81¥1 = 620,! GAL.1Y1'1
ET'AlJ CMfDIUY '#.tU:R llSV = (44.2~ 1'. «l.E2) l r~_71x 6J'l9j = -9'7,SM GAL/YR TOTAL ETWU =72'.mG~Ll•R
MeYJMW If'! FP !'!JFE 61 I OW.lNg,
MAWA-:ToTAl... lA~Sca>EC AR£AJ • '4-1.2) ll(JJi~ >: (0.4'SX 87.Jl301=-L083..ll'J2 GDLIVR ~
Taylor Boulevard
P 1 e a s a n t H i 1 1, C a 1 i f o r n i a
July 2s, 2021 L5

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ~
t8t
6'-0" WOOD l'b'NCi:-
TYPlCAL- ·
Rfil AINING WALL
PER CIVIL. "IYPICAL
8'-0" 'IDTAL HEIGHT VIEW
FENCI:i AT RETAINING WALL,

TYPICAL
6'-0" VIEW .FENCE, TYPICAL
GRAPHlC
~ SCAL~
~ r
·-
. .r"'f,.. .1
EXISTING TREE TO j/ BE REMOVED, lYPICAL --
t arnn ) I._.. - 30 ft. OVIL RETAINING WALL. TYP. _j
LANDSCAPE ARWITEC'.TI!RE LAND PLANNING 1615RDNAl'llAS'IUm !t.'t'fflJl,1
WALMll'C'U.lltCA94""
niL: 9259'91'77 FA:<: 923nl'T4"

M PRELIMINARY TREE PALETIE N
-- -- Ill& lfllFIM/M_,,- --- -
PISTACIA CHlt-iENSIS 1KE111-I DAYE'!' 241 BOX 2:)-3:,1 WlDE/2~-~1 HIGH -~- 0UERCUc AGRIFOLIA C.AST LIVE JAK l4' BOX 20-70' Wll)E/20-7'' HIOH LOW ' ---. - -·1 QIJEfh";Uc.:; L,BATA \IALLf'( '1AI< 2'1" BOX D-S:O' '/IIDE/f"-8-0' HIGH LOW ---i~--~--~~~~~~u:~-----~~l
/ii
· ·- fl Cl\--·
0 ~ ARBUTUS 'MARl~A' IIPP.INA MADRONE 15 G!LJ.C~ 401 WIDE/40-50' HIGH LOW ~"-ff , ) llli~NOLI.A •sr · .ARt 'I SOUTHERN 11.AGNOLIA 2..;.•eox 301 WIDE/301 HIGH MEO 1 11 ~1- 0 PRUlruSCAAOWIA'"' CAROLINA CHERR> LAUREL 24' eox 2$' WIOEtJ-c' Mk"J-1 'lJ
I!' I,
Ii r;
0 0
i f ~
.. 11'
~I T° 6'-0" WOOD t,'ENCE . 1/ ''\ \1 TYPICAL
. '~. : f\) 11
~,- 1ll
r ;'-
J -·t
-E- . -~-L P,,--b * If -'!
. t. Ni" GlJARDRAILAT
Ii RETAINING WALL ,1,
I
,,J,1' · ,· J ' /' , 1 1· :: I . I !-;
:;:
;fa! _.· ·,._: ; , 'i 11
¢.i''' ·. j l'i _··. . . I I
. >-~--#:~:;;_~~----:- " ·,_ . . .I · ii '
/ :/ ~ -~~>----~tA1"1l5CAJ'E --81i . ~ - I '-.: ~ '.
~ r'f\ .,~ . . -"---=-. . '~<.-- ;.:~~S~!'[' - ·-:,;.:::~~ \ • . . r I I ;,...... / ~ ....- . ' '---.._ ___ , __ 6'-0" WOOD FENCE. '\. - - 8'-0"TOTAL WOOD FENCBON RETAINING TYPICAL
"- WALL, TYPlCAL
~--· EXlSTlNO TREE 10 REMAIN, TYPICAL
a CATALYST DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS a
Fencing Plan
--
CERCIS OC~OENTAIJS WESTERN REDB~ 15 G-ILL~S 20-25' "1Dfl20·l0' ~ IIED LAGERSTROE~IA L '1\JSCAR?RA' rR~JE MYRTLE 15 G'LW, 15·18' WIDE1l0·25' HIGH L'Af 3'1 TCTAL PROFOS£0 TREES 1"5

FENCE LEGEND
8YMIOL FENCli 1YPE
6'-0" HIGH WOOD FEt:CE - SEE DETAIL D, SHEET L3
8'-C/' TOTAL HEIGHT WOOD FENCE ON RETAIM!IG WALL - SEE OET.AIL E. ~HEET L3 6'-0" VIEW FENCE - SEE CETAIL B. SHEET LJ
8'-C/' TCTAL HEK;HT VIEW FENCE O'.; RETAl'IING l'iALL - SEE DETAIL C, SHEET L3 3'-6" uUARD RAIL 0~ RET.41NING WALL - ~EE DETAIL A, SHEET Lo Taylor Boulevard
P I c a s a n t I I i J I, C a I i f o r n i a
JULY 28, 2021 L6

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) ..

I '
q

7.6.c
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Vesting Tentative Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) JUNE 2022

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2021-0297875

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OWNER'S STATEMENT: SUBDIVISION 9520

THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY STATE THAT THEY ARE THE OWNERS OF ALL LANDS DELINEATED AND EMBRACED WITHIN THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY OF THIS SUBDIVISION MAP ENTITLED "SUBDIVISION 9520, CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA", CONSISTING OF SIX (6) SHEETS, THIS STATEMENT BEING UPON SHEET ONE (1) THEREOF; THAT THEY HAVE CAUSED SAID MAP TO BE PREPARED FOR RECORD AND CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF SAID MAP; AND THAT SAID MAP PARTICULARLY SETS FORTH AND DESCRIBES ALL THE PARCELS INTENDED FOR SALE BY THEIR NUMBER AND PRECISE WIDTH AND LENGTH.

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:

1. THE AREAS DESIGNATED AS EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT (EVAE) AS SHOWN UPON SAID MAP, FOR THE PURPOSE OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OF EMERGENCY VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT.

2. THE AREAS OR STRIPS OF LAND DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (PUE), AS SHOWN UPON SAID MAP, ARE HEREBY

DEDICATED AS EASEMENTS TO THE PUBLIC FOREVER, WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF

CONSTRUCTING AND MAINTAINING APPLICABLE UTILITY STRUCTURES, AND ALL APPURTENANCES THERETO, UNDER , UPON AND OVER SAID AREAS OR STRIPS OF LAND. SAID AREAS OR STRIPS OF LAND ARE TO BE KEPT OPEN AND FREE FROM BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF ANY KIND, EXCEPT APPLICABLE UTILITY STRUCTURES AND APPURTENANCES.

AND THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY RESERVE TO ITSELF AND TO THE OWNERS, RESIDENTS, CUSTOMERS AND OTHERS DESIGNATED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION OF SUBDIVISION 9520, THE AREAS MARKED AS PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT (PRAE), AND PARCELS "A" AND "B" AS SHOWN UPON SAID MAP. SAID PARCELS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PRIVATE INGRESS AND EGRESS,

PRIVATE STREETS, PRIVATE UTILITIES, PRIVATE STORM DRAINS, OVERLAND DRAINAGE RELEASE, LANDSCAPING AND ALL APPURTENANCES. MAINTENANCE OF SAID PRIVATE ACCESS WAYS AND PARCELS IS TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION GOVERNING SUBDIVISION 9520, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS GOVERNING SUBDIVISION 9520. SAID PARCELS ARE NOT OFFERED FOR DEDICATION TO THE PUBLIC AND ARE TO BE CONVEYED TO THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION GOVERNING SUBDIVISION 9520 BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT.

AND THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY RESERVE TO ITSELF AND TO THE OWNERS, RESIDENTS, CUSTOMERS AND OTHERS DESIGNATED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION OF SUBDIVISION 9520, PARCELS "C" AND "D" AS SHOWN UPON SAID MAP. SAID PARCELS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUT NOT LIMITED TO, OPEN SPACE, STORM WATER TREATMENT, LANDSCAPING AND ALL APPURTENANCES.

MAINTENANCE OF SAID PRIVATE ACCESS WAYS AND PARCELS IS TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION GOVERNING SUBDIVISION 9520, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS GOVERNING SUBDIVISION 9520. SAID

PARCELS ARE NOT OFFERED FOR DEDICATION TO THE PUBLIC AND ARE TO BE CONVEYED TO THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION GOVERNING SUBDIVISION 9520 BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT.

THE AREA MARKED SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (SSE) WILL BE DEDICATED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT TO THE CENTRAL CONTRA

COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT (CCCSD) OR ITS DESIGNEE, FOR PUBLIC USE FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION,

ACCESS OR MAINTENANCE OF WORKS, IMPROVEMENTS AND STRUCTURES WHETHER COVERED OR OPEN, OR THE CLEARING OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND VEGETATION.

THE AREA MARKED WATER LINE EASEMENT (WLE) WILL BE DEDICATED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT TO THE CONTRA COSTA WATER

DISTRICT (CCWD) OR ITS DESIGNEE AS AN EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY STRUCTURES AND RELATED APPURTENANCES. NO BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FENCES OR TREES MAY BE PLACED ON SAID EASEMENT.

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS ALSO SUBJECT TO THE CERTAIN DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND

RESTRICTIONS (CC&R'S) THAT GOVERN THIS SUBDIVISION AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR TERMS.

THIS MAP SHOWS OR NOTES ALL EASEMENTS, EXISTING OR OF RECORD, WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THIS MAP.

CDP PH HOLDING LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY:

NAME: TITLE: DATE: CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' STATEMENT:

I HEREBY STATE AS CHECKED BELOW THAT:
□ A TAX BOND ASSURING PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES WHICH ARE NOW A LIEN, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. □ ALL TAXES DUE HAVE BEEN PAID, AS CERTIFIED BY THE COUNTY REDEMPTION OFFICE.

DATE: MONICA NINO

CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OF CONTRA COSTA

COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BY:

STACEY M. BOYD

DEPUTY CLERK
COUNTY RECORDER'S STATEMENT:

FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF , 2022 AT M., IN BOOK OF MAPS AT PAGES THROUGH , UNDER SERIES NO. AT THE REQUEST OF

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

FEE: $_____________
_______________________________________ COUNTY RECORDER IN AND FOR CONTRA

COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BY:

OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL

WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF }SS
ON , 2022, BEFORE ME , A NOTARY PUBLIC,

PERSONALLY APPEARED

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE

SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN

HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL:

SIGNATURE:

PRINTED NAME, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS:

COMMISSION EXPIRES:

COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:

CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT:

I, DANIELLE HABR, CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP ENTITLED:
“SUBDIVISION 9520”, WAS PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL, AS PROVIDED BY LAW, AT A REGULAR MEETING ON THE DAY OF , 2022, AND THAT SAID COUNCIL DID

THEREUPON APPROVE SAID MAP, AND ACCEPTED THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (PUE), AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS

EASEMENT (EVAE) DEDICATED THEREON FOR PUBLIC USE AND NEITHER ACCEPTED NOR REJECTED ANY SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (SSE) AND WATER LINE EASEMENT (WLE).

I FURTHER STATE THAT ALL AGREEMENTS AND SURETY, AS REQUIRED BY LAW TO ACCOMPANY THE WITHIN MAP, HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL AND ARE FILED IN MY OFFICE.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND THIS _____ DAY OF ______________, 2022.

DANIELLE HABR

CITY CLERK, CITY OF PLEASANT HILL,

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

TAYLOR BLVD

SITE NORSE DR LUCILLE LANECONTRA COSTA CANAL

VICINITY MAP
SOILS REPORT:

A SOILS REPORT FOR "SUBDIVISION 9520" HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ENGEO INCORPORATED, ENTITLED 401 TAYLOR BOULEVARD, PLEASANT HILL, CALIFORNIA, GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, PROJECT NO. 15617.000.000 AND DATED MARCH 16, 2020. TRUSTEE'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL

WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF }SS
ON , 2022, BEFORE ME , A NOTARY PUBLIC,

PERSONALLY APPEARED

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE

SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN

HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL:

SIGNATURE:

PRINTED NAME, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS:

COMMISSION EXPIRES:

COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:

TRUSTEE STATEMENT:

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED OCTOBER 22, 2021 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2021-0297876, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDS, HEREBY CONSENTS TO THE MAKING AND FILING OF THIS MAP.

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY
DATE:

BY:

ITS:

CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:

I, ANANTHAN KANAGASUNDARAM, CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS FINAL MAP ENTITLED “SUBDIVISION 9520", AND THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON IS

SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE APPROVED VESTING TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS

THEREOF, AND THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE STATE LAWS AND LOCAL ORDINANCES APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.

DATED: , 2022
ANANTHAN KANAGASUNDARAM , RCE 77233

CITY ENGINEER

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
CITY PLANNING COMMISION'S STATEMENT:

I HEREBY STATE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, HAS APPROVED ON AUGUST 16, 2021 THE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP OF SUBDIVISION 9520 UPON WHICH THIS FINAL MAP IS BASED.

DATED: , 2022

TROY FUJIMOTO

CITY PLANNER, CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

7.6.d
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Final Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) N0°01'29"W 382.77' BNDY
913.33' (913.41' R-2)
N89°58'31"E 905.33' (905.41 R-3)
(145.06' R-3) (167.15'R-3) (95.01'R-3)

STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
BOOK 6807, PAGE 465

RELINQUISHMENT OF

ABUTTERS RIGHTS
BOOK 4122, PAGE 710
38' 10' UTILITY EASEMENT (R-5)(R-6) 10' SEWER EASEMENT (R-5)(R-6)

60.01' RIGHT OF WAY
(R-5)(R-6)
(60' R-3)
N89°39'21"E 407.16' BNDY
145.04' 167.13' 94.99'

22.00'
(R-3)

8.00'(R-3)
L1(R)
L2
L3
L4
SNF
335.51' (R-4) 414.55' N1°03'08"W 130.08' (R-4)

59.54'
(R-4) 349.48'
SNF
SNF
SNF
SNF

SNF SNF
SNF
SNF
SNF
SNF
C2 C3
30' R/W AND
UTILITY EASEMENT (R-7)
"S" LINE (R-1)

TAYLOR BLVD MON LINE
(R-2)(R-3)
SNF
23 1
18 19 20 21 22
24 31
28 27 26 25
5 2
4 3
6 PARCEL B 9 8 7
30 29
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10

PARCEL D PARCEL A

PARCEL C
N18°00'21"W 465.29' BNDY
N80°30'40"E 54.57' BNDY
(54.50' R-1)
N89°58'31"E 225.98' BNDY (R-1)
N58°01'18"W 28.30' BNDY (R-1)
N89°35'26"W 197.37' BNDYL5 L6
L7
L9 L8 L11 L10
L12
L13 L14
N88°56'52"E 409.02' (408.99' R-4)
N0°01'29"W 125.00' BNDY
(R-2)(R-3) N0°01'29"W 474.17' (R-2)(R-3)
L15(R) L16(R) L17
N0°01'29"W
100.00'(R-1)
N89°58'31"E 470.00' (R-1)
(N89°58'31"E 1298.82' R-2)
N88°10'17"E 750.06' (749.81' R-4)

15.17'
(R-5)
(R-6)
246.99' (247.1' (R-1))

8.00'
BASIS OF BEARINGS N0°01'29"W 100.00'
N0°01'29"W 60.00' (R-1)
N0°01'29"W 75.00' (R-1) (R-1) 20.02'(R-1)
249.98' (R-1) 200.00'
N89°58'31"E
(77.10' R-1)

76.99' N0°01'29"W

34.98'
FOUND 1.5" BRASS DISC
FOUND 1.5" BRASS DISC STAMPED RCE 9267
STAMPED RCE 9267

FOUND BRASS PIN

IN CONCRETE, NO TAG

FOUND BRASS PIN
IN 1.5" IRON PIPE, NO TAG

FOUND BRASS DISC
STAMPED RCE 9622
FOUND 2" IRON PIPE
NO TAG
FOUND 1.5" IRON PIPE
NAIL & TAG RCE 9622
S54°07'09"E 0.36'

TO THE CORNER

FOUND BASS DISC
STAMPED RCE 2370

NO PUNCH

FOUND BRASS DISC

ILLEGIBLE
BNDY C1 22' Curve Table
Curve #
C1
C2
C3
Radius

50.00'

44.00'

44.00'
Delta
89°33'57"
49°55'23"
72°55'41"
Length

78.16'

38.34'

56.00'
(R-3)
(R-3)
(R-3)
(R-3)
(R-4)
(R-4)
(R-4)
(R-4)
(R-4)
(N82°54'12"W R-4)
(N85°12'47"E R-4)
(N58°03'17"W 160.29' R-4)
(N21°19'19"W 146.41' R-4)
(44.12' R-4)
(174.09' R-3)
(N0°47'00"W 105.50' R-3)
(N13°46'49"W 132.74' R-3)
Line Table
Line #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
Bearing
N75°41'57"E
N27°54'17"E
N62°05'43"W
N27°54'17"E
N0°20'39"W
N2°01'50"W
N83°39'06"E
N83°51'37"E
N88°52'38"W
N82°53'49"W
N85°12'17"E
S58°01'33"E
N21°17'36"W
N0°50'39"E
N47°09'07"W
N2°46'16"E
N13°45'36"E
Length

44.00'

8.00'

72.00'

70.00'
156.53'
124.16'

33.36'
140.81'
250.05'

80.62'

62.91'
160.86'
146.93'

43.74'
174.10'
105.50'
132.74'
*
JUNE 2022

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2021-0297875

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SUBDIVISION 9520
SNF
CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

I, MICHAEL J. MIDDLETON, CITY SURVEYOR FOR THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, DO HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE MAP ENTITLED “SUBDIVISION 9520” AND I AM SATISFIED THAT THE SURVEY DATA SHOWN THEREON IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.

DATED: , 2022
MICHAEL J. MIDDLETON , R.C.E. 29485

CITY SURVEYOR OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE

REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCES AT THE REQUEST OF CDP PLEASANT HILL, LLC IN NOVEMBER OF 2019. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED

TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY, AND THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS INDICATED HEREON ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY POSITIONS

INDICATED HEREON OR WILL BE SET WITHIN TWENTY FOUR MONTHS FROM RECORDATION OF THIS FINAL MAP, AND THE

COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS, AND WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED, AND THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THE GROSS AREA WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION IS 4.86 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.

DATED: , 2022

IAN BRUCE MACDONALD
LS NO. 8817

7.6.d
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Final Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

8.13' 5' PUE, WLE 5' PUE, WLE 5' PUE, WLE
4762± SF
1 24
31 27
3105± SF
26 3942± SF
25 4791± SF
2 3150± SF
5 3150± SF
4 3219± SF
3 6

0.76±AC

PARCEL A

0.71±AC

PARCEL C
N89°35'26"W 197.36'
N46°39'00"W 56.77'
N9°31'29"W 92.03'
N89°58'31"E 61.05'
N89°35'26"W 221.51' N0°24'34"E 69.90'
R=61.50' Δ=72°57'24" L=78.31'
R=23.00' Δ=73°23'27" L=29.46'
R=23.00'
Δ=90°00'00"
L=36.13'

45.00' 45.00' 47.00' 34.94'

6.47'

45.00' 45.00' 45.00' 37.92' 24.45'

85.56'

53.36' 7.69'

45.00'

6.03'

45.00' Δ
L
=
=
2 3
8°57'26"

1.08' Δ=20°31'00"
L=22.02' Δ=23°28'58"
L=25.21' N0°24'34"E 69.00' N0°24'34"E 69.00'
N89°35'26"W 70.00'
N89°35'26"W 94.75'

45.00' N0°24'34"E 61.07' N0°24'34"E 70.00' N0°24'34"E 70.00' N0°24'34"E 70.00' N60°07'00"E 67.41' N29°22'00"E(R)

19.00'
N49°53'00"E(R)

19.22' N0°01'29"W 382.77' BNDY
N89°35'26"W 197.37' BNDY
* *
N89°35'26"W 221.51' M-M
N44°35'26"W 56.57' M-M N0°24'34"E 48.92' M-M N0°24'34"E 20.98' M-M N89°58'31"E 116.04' M-M

94.04' M-PL 22.00' M-PL 129.65' 20.00' 20.00'
5' PUE,
WLE
N0°24'34"E(R)

19.00'
N0°24'34"E(R)

17.00' N0°01'29"W 474.17' (R-2)(R-3) 199.11' 233.00' M-M 20' 20' N89°35'26"W 213.38' 57.94'17'
17' 129.65'

60.01' 42.06'

22.00' 8.00' 30.01'
N89°58'31"E 268.98' N0°01'29"W 40.02'

PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE

PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE

RELINQUISHMENT OF ABUTTER'S RIGHTS
BOOK 4122, PAGE 710

STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
BOOK 6807, PAGE 465
10' 7.25' PUE, WLE

12.25' 40.28' 5' PUE, WLE
R=50.00' Δ=89°33'57"
L=78.16' BNDY
SCENIC CORRIDOR 50' 1' PRAE 1' PRAE
1' PRAE 1' PRAE 1' PRAE
1' PRAE 1' PRAE

4.5' 4.5' 8' PUE, WLE 5' PUE, WLE 5' PUE, WLE8' PUE WLE *
JUNE 2022

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2021-0297875

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SUBDIVISION 9520 PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE
N89°58'31"E 905.33' (905.41 R-3)

7.6.d
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Final Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) 5' PUE, WLE
N89°58'31"E 225.98' BNDY N80°30'40"E 54.57' BNDY
N18°00'21"W 465.29' BNDY
N89°58'31"E 49.39'
N89°35'26"W 154.67'
N18°00'21"W 98.96' N18°00'21"W 91.01' N71°59'39"E 70.00' N71°59'39"E 70.00'
N71°59'39"E 81.68'
R=59.00' Δ=108°24'5 " L=111.64'
N89°35'26"W 213.38'
N89°35'26"W 221.51' N0°24'34"E 81.70' N0°24'34"E 79.00' N0°24'34"E 79.00' N0°24'34"E 70.00' 31 3105± SF
28 3105± SF
27 26
5 3242± SF
6 3010± SF PARCEL B
4449± SF
9 3571± SF
8 3555± SF
7 30
3901± SF
29 14
3281± SF
13 3304± SF
12 3150± SF
11 3539± SF
10 0.76±AC

PARCEL A

0.71±AC

PARCEL C

27.35' 45.00' 45.00'

39.51' 45.00' 45.00'

9.75' 40.82'

44.44'

45.00'

9.52'
N18°00'21"W 99.26' N18°00'21"W 99.26' N89°35'26"W 85.19' N89°35'26"W 94.75'

48.43' 45.00' 45.00' N0°24'34"E 69.00' N0°24'34"E 69.00' N0°24'34"E 69.00' Δ =
3 6°4
0'5
6"
L
=
3 7.7
7' Δ=23°58'40" L=24.69' Δ=28°44'29"
L=29.60' Δ=17°24'00" L=17.92'
Δ=1°36'49" L=1.66'
N71°59'39"E 70.00' 45.00'

45.00'

45.00'

51.73'

58.56' -

4.80'

86.21'
R=52.00' Δ=37°58'38" L=34.47'
R=27.50'
Δ=37°58'38"
L=18.23'
N55°58'59"W 2.74'
N55°58'59"W

1.99'
N71°19'24"W(R)
N69°42'35"W(R) N16°59'26"W(R)
N45°43'55"W(R)

64.67' 45.00' 45.00' N65°56'31"W

22.44'
N89°35'26"W
197.36'

24.45' 5' PUE, WLE
5' PUE, WLE
R=23.00'
Δ=108°24'55"
L=43.52'
5' PUE, WLE
5' PUE, WLE
5' PUE, WLE
*
*
N36°12'07"E 64.89' M-M
N89°35'26"W 221.51' M-M
N18°00'21"W 99.26' M-M
N0°24'34"E(R)

19.00'
N0°24'34"E(R)

17.00'
17'
19'

23.63' 25.76'
N58°01'18"W

28.30' BNDYN89°35'26"W
197.37' BNDY

PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE

PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE

PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE
FD 2" IP
NO TAG

RELINQUISHMENT OF ABUTTER'S RIGHTS
BOOK 4122, PAGE 710
N71°59'39"E 47.52'

7.25' PUE, WLE

15.50'

35.70'
SCENIC CORRIDOR N71°59'39"E 59.50'
R=38.50' Δ=90°00'00" L=60.48'
N18°00'21"W 2.71'

3.69'

20.00' 50'
1' PRAE
1' PRAE
1' PRAE 1' PRAE
1' PRAE 1' PRAE 1' PRAE

WATER LINE EASEMENT
*
JUNE 2022

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2021-0297875

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SUBDIVISION 9520

7.6.d
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Final Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) 5' PUE, WLE 3' PUE, WLE
5' PUE, WLE
3800± SF
18 3150± SF
19 3150± SF
20 21
24 5645± SF
31 28 27 26 25
5049± SF
30 29
5669± SF
17 3309± SF
16 3150± SF
15 3150± SF
14 13

0.76±AC N18°00'21"W 465.29' BNDY

PARCEL A
N89°39'21"E 407.16' BNDY

45.00'

45.00'

45.00'

43.50'

41.50'

41.77'

65.00'

45.00'

45.00'

24.65'

42.33'

58.44'

45.00'

44.51'
N89°35'26"W 85.19' N0°24'34"E 65.63'
N83°08'00"E 191.69'
R=59.00' Δ=78°51'39" L=81.21'
R=23.00'
Δ=78°51'39"
L=31.66'
N83°08'00"E 191.69'
N18°00'21"W 99.26'
N71°59'39"E 70.00'
N71°59'39"E 70.00'
N71°59'39"E 70.00'
N71°59'39"E 65.68' N10°30'00"E(R) 76.16' N6°52'00"W 70.00' 5' PUE, WLE N18°00'21"W 99.26'
N36°18'00"E(R) 18.97'
Δ=35°12'59" L=36.26' Δ=25°48'00" L=26.57' Δ=17°22'00"
L=17.88'
N65°17'00"W 32.01' N83°08'00"E 331.78'
N89°35'26"W 94.75'

95.51'

45.00'
N6°52'00"W 70.00'
N6°52'00"W 70.00'

45.00'
*
*
* *
N18°00'21"W 99.26' M-M
N83°08'00"E 191.69' M-M N57°26'10"W 50.81' M-M N6°52'00"W(R)

17.00'
N6°52'00"W(R)

19.00'
17' 19'
17'
19'
N71°30'59"E(R)

45.00'
Δ=0°28'40"
L=0.49'

PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE

PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE
FOUND 1.5" IRON PIPE
NAIL & TAG RCE 9622
S54°07'09"E 0.36'
TO THE CORNER N0°24'34"E 53.54'
1' PRAE
1' PRAE
1' PRAE
1' PRAE
*
JUNE 2022

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2021-0297875

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SUBDIVISION 9520

7.6.d
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Final Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding) 5' PUE, WLE
3496± SF
23 20 3150± SF
21 3157± SF
22 4281± SF
24 31
26 25

0.69±AC

PARCEL D

0.76±AC
PARCEL A N0°24'34"E 69.90'
N83°08'00"E 191.69'
N83°08'00"E 191.69'
N89°58'31"E 54.35' N0°01'29"W 382.77' BNDY N0°01'29"W 125.00' BNDY N89°39'21"E 407.16' BNDY

45.00' 213.12' 45.01'

45.00'

53.85' 34.96'

45.00'

32.04'
N6°52'00"W 70.00' N6°52'00"W 70.00' N6°52'00"W 71.44' N6°52'00"W 69.59' R=59.00' Δ=82°43'26" L=85.18'
R=23.00'
Δ=82°43'26"
L=33.21' N0°24'34"E 69.00' N89°35'26"W 70.00'
N83°08'00"E 331.78'
N51°10'00"W(R) 24.00'
Δ=31°36'00"
L=32.54' Δ=38°25'26" L=39.5
7'
Δ=12°42'00"
L=13.08'
5' PUE,
WLE
3' PUE, WLE 3' PUE, WLE
N19°34'00"W(R)
* *
N6°52'00"W(R)

17.00'
N6°52'00"W(R)

19.00'
N41°46'17"E 52.87' M-M N0°24'34"E 48.92' M-M
N83°08'00"E 191.69' M-M
N89°58'31"E 116.04' M-M

94.04' M-PL 22.00'M-PL 20.00' N0°01'29"W 233.00' M-M
N13°45'36"E
132.74' N0°24'34"E 8.22'
5' PUE,
WLE
R=21.00' Δ=89°33'57" L=32.83'

22.00' 8.00'

PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE

PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE PUE, PRAE, EVAE, SSE, WLE
ILLEGIBLE N0°24'34"E 53.54'

3.50'
N89°35'26"W 45.00' 11.06' 1' PRAE
1' PRAE
1' PRAE
1' PRAE
1' PRAE
*
JUNE 2022

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2021-0297875

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SUBDIVISION 9520
SNF

7.6.d
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Final Map (Final Map for 401 Taylor and Agreeement with CDP PH Holding)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-22 AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FOR THE ALLOCATION OF 2022 HIGHWAY SAFETY
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CYCLE 11 GRANT FUNDS

SYNOPSIS
The purpose of this item is to consider adopting a resolution to authorize the City Engineer to request the allocation of Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 11 grant funds.

The City is submitting a grant proposal that includes three capital improvement projects:
1) Gregory Lane Complete Streets Improvement Project for $9,170,000; and 2) Pleasant Hill Road Improvements (Phase V) and Boyd Road/Pleasant Hill Signal Installation Project for a combined $8,713,000. These three projects will improve safety and access for all modes of transportation including bicycles, pedestrians, and vehicles.

DISCUSSION
Background
The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a highly competitive federal-aid program under the United States Code, Title 23, Section 148. Its purpose is to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and severe injuries on all public roads including city- and countyowned roads. An HSIP Cycle 11 call-for-project was announced on May 9, 2022, for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023. HSIP grants fund project design and construction phases. The grant proposal submittal deadline is September 12, 2022, and HSIP will select projects and award funding based on the ranking of benefit-cost ratios. Grant recipients must construct awarded projects by June 30, 2026.

Although the maximum HSIP funding available to the City of Pleasant Hill is $10 million, the City is allowed to submit a grant proposal including multiple projects with a total fund request exceeding $10 million. If all projects were selected, HSIP would award to the City the highest ranked project, then the next highest ranked project, and so on until the total fund amount awarded reaches the $10 million cap.

7.7 Packet Pg. 137
Analysis
The Gregory Lane Complete Streets Improvement Project is an unfunded capital improvement project, as descibed in the recently adopted 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget. The project limits are Pleasant Hill Road and Contra Costa Boulevard. The scope of work includes bicycle and pedestrian safety and access improvements, the addition of on-street parking, and pavement repairs.

The Pleasant Hill Road Improvements Project (Phase V) and the Boyd Road/Pleasant Hill Signal Installation Project are also identified as unfunded capital improvement projects in the recently adopted 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget. For the purpose of the grant proposal, these two projects on Pleasant Hill Road are combined as a single project. The project limits are Boyd Road and Gregory Lane. The scope of work includes bicycle and pedestrian safety and access improvements, the addition of on-street parking, pavement repairs, a traffic signal, ADA curb ramps, new left-turn pockets, and pavement re-striping.

FISCAL IMPACT
The grant proposal includes two projects: the Gregory Lane Project and the combined Pleasant Hill Road and Boyd Road projects, which are estimated at $9,170,000 and $8,713,000, respectively. Their required local matching funds are $917,000 and $871,300, respectively, which represent 10% of the grant amounts. Due to the maximum $10 million cap per agency, as described above, the Highway Safety Improvement Program will fund only one of the two projects. Should neither project be awarded an HSIP grant, the City will need to identify other funding opportunities.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends adopting the proposed resolution.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
If the City Council chooses not to adopt the proposed Resolution, the projects will remain unfunded.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Prepared by: Philip Ho, Senior Civil Engineer

7.7 Packet Pg. 138
Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.7 Packet Pg. 139
RESOLUTION NO. -22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF 2022 HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CYCLE 11) GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a federal-aid program under the United States Code, Title 23, Section 148; and WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration has designed the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to evaluate, program, and administer HSIP Cycle 11 funds; and
WHEREAS, Caltrans announced a call-for-project to local agencies including the City of Pleasant Hill inviting them to submit grant proposals to request HSIP Cycle 11 funds for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill recently adopted Fiscal Year 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program Budget indentifies the Gregory Lane Complete Streets Improvement Project as an unfunded capital improvement project; and WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill recently adopted Fiscal Year 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program Budget identifies the Pleasant Hill Road Improvements Project (Phase V) and the Boyd Road/Pleasant Hill Road Signal Installation Project as unfunded capital improvement projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill desires to submit a request to Caltrans to allocate HSIP Cycle 11 grant funds for the Gregory Lane Complete Streets Improvement Project, which will improve safety and access for bicycles and pedestrians; and WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill desires to submit a request to Caltrans to allocate HSIP Cycle 11 grant funds for the Pleasant Hill Road Improvements Project (Phase V) and the Boyd Road/Pleasant Hill Road Signal Installation Project, which will improve safety and access for all modes of transportation including bicycles, pedestrians, and vehicles; and WHEREAS, the Gregory Lane Complete Streets Improvement Project estimated cost is $9,170,000, and the required local match is $971,000, which represents 10% of the project cost; and
WHEREAS, the Pleasant Hill Road Improvements Project (Phase V) and the Boyd Road/Pleasant Hill Road Signal Installation Project combined estimated cost is $8,713,000, and the required combined local match is $871,300, which represents 10% of the combined project cost; and

7.7.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (HSIP Cycle 11 Grant Funds) WHEREAS, the City’s local match commitment shall be limited to one of the two projects in the grant proposal if awarded a grant by HSIP.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that, the City of Pleasant Hill declares it is eligible to request an allocation of HSIP Cycle 11 grant funds pursuant to United States Code, Title 23, Section 148, and furthermore, be it RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the three capital improvement projects, or that might impair the ability of the City of Pleasant Hill to carry out the projects; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is authorized to submit a request for HSIP Cycle 11 grant funds; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to Caltrans.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 1
st of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk

7.7.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (HSIP Cycle 11 Grant Funds)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-22 AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE
ALLOCATION OF 2022 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL GRANT

PROGRAM FUNDS

SYNOPSIS
The purpose of this item is to consider adopting a resolution to authorize the City Engineer to submit a request for the allocation of Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant Program funds. The proposal would fund a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan. The Action Plan sets goals, creates a framework to reduce roadway fatalities and severe injuries, addresses policy and equity issues, engages stakeholders, and prioritizes projects and strategies.

DISCUSSION
Background
The Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant Program is a U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) federal-aid program created by Section 24112 of the H.R. 3684 The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, is also referred to as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. It is a discretionary grant program that appropriates $1 billion each year to USDOT for the next five years. The SS4A program supports the USDOT National Roadway Safety Strategy and its goals of zero deaths and severe injuries on our nation’s roadways.

An SS4A call-for-project was announced on May 16, 2022, for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The grant proposal submittal deadline is September 15, 2022. SS4A has two components, namely Action Plan Grant and Implementation Grants. The City of Pleasant Hill is eligible to request funds from the Action Plan Grant component to prepare a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan.

Upon completing the Action Plan, the City will be eligible to pursue the Implementation Grant component of SS4A in the future.

Analysis
The Comprehensive Safety Action Plan’s scope of work includes goal setting, planning, safety analysis, conceptual plan, preliminary engineering, stakeholder engagement and collaboration,

7.8 Packet Pg. 142
and development of projects and strategies. Interventions can be infrastructure, behavioral, and/or operational safety.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Comprehensive Safety Action Plan’s cost is estimated at $200,000. The required local matching fund is $40,000, which represents 20% of the grant amount.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends adopting the proposed resolution to authorize the City Engineer to submit a request for the allocation of SS4A grant funds.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
If the City Council chooses not to adopt the proposed Resolution, an Action Plan will not be available and the City will be ineligible to pursue the Implementation Grant component of SS4A in the future.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Prepared by: Philip Ho, Senior Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.8 Packet Pg. 143
RESOLUTION NO. -22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF 2022 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL GRANT

PROGRAM FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Safe Streets and Road for All (SS4A) Grant Program is a U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) federal-aid program created by Section 24112 of the H.R. 3684 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also referred to as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law; and WHEREAS, the USDOT is the agency designated to evaluate, program, and administer SS4A funds; and
WHEREAS, USDOT announced a call-for-project to local agencies including the City of Pleasant Hill inviting them to submit grant proposals to request SS4A funds for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill is eligible to request SS4A funds to prepare a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan cost is estimated at $200,000, and the required local match is $40,000 which represents 20% of the project cost.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that, the City of Pleasant Hill declares it is eligible to request an allocation of SS4A grant funds pursuant to Section 24112 of the H.R. 3684 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is authorized to request for SS4A grant funds; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to USDOT.
[Signatures on Following Page]

7.8.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Safe Streets SS4A Grant Funds) ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 1
st of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk

7.8.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Safe Streets SS4A Grant Funds)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-22 AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE
ALLOCATION OF 2022 RECONNECTING COMMUNITIES PILOT

DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS

SYNOPSIS
The purpose of this item is to consider adopting a Resolution to authorize the City Engineer to request the allocation of Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Discretionary Grant funds. The grant proposal would fund a feasibility study for the Coggins Road Iron Horse Trail Connector Project to improve safety and access for all modes of transportation including bicycles, pedestrians, and vehicles.

DISCUSSION
Background
The Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Discretionary Grant is a U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) federal-aid program pursuant to Executive Order 14052, Implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. It appropriates up to $195 million for Fiscal Year 2022. The purpose of RCP is to reconnect communities by removing, retrofitting, or mitigating transportation facilities, such as highways and rail lines that create barriers to community connectivity, including mobility, access, or economic development.

An RCP call-for-projects was announced on June 30, 2022, for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The grant proposal submittal deadline is October 13, 2022. The RCP has two components, Planning Grant and Capital Construction Grant. The City of Pleasant Hill is eligible to request funds from the Planning Grant component of RCP to prepare a feasibility study of the Coggins Road Iron Horse Trail Connector Project. Upon completing the feasibility study, the City will be eligible to pursue the Capital Construction Grant component of RCP in the future.

Analysis
The Coggins Road Iron Horse Trail Connector Project feasibility study scope of work includes planning, feasibility analysis, public engagement, conceptual plan, and preliminary engineering.

7.9 Packet Pg. 146
The study will assess the feasibility of removing, retrofitting, or mitigating an existing eligible facility to reconnect communities.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Coggins Road Iron Horse Trail Connector Project feasibility study cost is estimated at $150,000. The required local matching fund is $30,000, which represents 20% of the grant amount.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends adopting the proposed Resolution to authorize the City Engineer to submit a request for allocation of RCP grant funds.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
If the City Council chooses not to adopt the proposed Resolution, a feasibility study will not be available and the City will be ineligible to pursue the Capital Construction Grant component of RCP in the future.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Prepared by: Philip Ho, Senior Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.9 Packet Pg. 147
RESOLUTION NO. -22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF 2022 RECONNECTING COMMUNITIES PILOT GRANT

PROGRAM FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Grant Program is a U.S.

Department of Transportation (USDOT) federal-aid program pursuant to Executive Order 14052, Implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act; and WHEREAS, the USDOT is the agency designated to evaluate, program, and administer RCP funds; and
WHEREAS, USDOT announced a call-for-project to local agencies, including the City of Pleasant Hill, inviting them to submit grant proposals to request RCP funds for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill is eligible to request the Planning Grant component of RCP funds to prepare a feasibility study on the Coggins Road Iron Horse Trail Connector Project; and
WHEREAS, the feasibility study cost is estimated at $150,000. The required local match is $30,000, which represents 20% of the cost.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that the City of Pleasant Hill declares it is eligible to request an allocation of RCPA grant funds pursuant to Executive Order 14052, Implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is authorized to submit a request for RCP grant funds; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to USDOT.
[Signatures on the Following Page]

7.9.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (RCP Grant Funds) ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 1
st of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk

7.9.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (RCP Grant Funds)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-22 AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH ADVANCED MOBILITY GROUP TO PREPARE A

LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN

SYNOPSIS
This item requests authorization for the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group (Consultant) to perform engineering services to prepare a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). The agreement requires the Consultant to evaluate citywide roadway and collision data, identify potential roadway hazards, develop an action plan to address multi-modal transportation safety needs, priority implementation, and outreach to stakeholders. An LRSP is required for the City to be eligible to apply for current and future Federal, State, and Regional transportation grants.

DISCUSSION
Background
Federal regulations require that the City prepare a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) to address roadway safety citywide and to support the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) mandate, a statewide approach to improve roadway safety. The SHSP addresses the 4Es of traffic safety:

Engineering, Enforcement, Education, and Emergency Services. LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and analyze safety problems and recommend safety improvements.

Preparing an LRSP facilitates the development of local agency partnerships and collaboration, resulting in a prioritized list of improvements and actions that can demonstrate a defined need, and supports the statewide plan. LRSP offers a proactive approach to addressing citywide transportation safety needs and demonstrates agency responsiveness to safety challenges. LRSP provides a framework for organizing stakeholders to identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements on local and rural roads.

Local Roadway Safety Plan scope of work includes the following: collects citywide roadway and collision data; identifies potential roadway hazards and hot spots; develops an action plan to address multi-modal transportation safety needs; prioritizes implementation; and conducts outreach to stakeholders.

7.10 Packet Pg. 150
Analysis
On July 1, 2022, staff issued a Request for Proposals to three qualified transportation and civil engineering firms, including TJKM, GHD, and Advanced Mobility Group (AMG). TJKM and AMG submitted a project proposal by the July 8, 2022 deadline.

To select the most qualified firm, staff evaluated each proposal and ranked them based on the following scoring criteria: project understanding, approach, project team qualifications, ability to deliver on time, and use of innovative solutions. The firms were ranked as listed below.

Rank No. 1 AMG Walnut Creek, CA
Rank No. 2 TJKM Pleasanton, CA
Advanced Mobility Group (AMG) demonstrated pertinent project understanding and insight including identification of collision locations, hot spots, high frequency collision street corridors, feasible countermeasures, and strategies. AMG has successfully delivered Local Roadway Safety Plan and safety-related capital improvement projects for local agencies including the cities of Concord, Danville, Hayward, Palo Alto, San Carlos, Rancho Cordova, Perris, and San Mateo County.

AMG’s proposal met all Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements as shown in Exhibit A. AMG’s proposal including scope of services, deliverables, and delivery schedule are complete and acceptable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City. Advanced Mobility Group’s fee proposal is $40,000, and as noted in the RFP, the project is funded by the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with an LRSP State Grant amount of $40,000. No local match or City fund contribution is required.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the adoption of the attached resolution, authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Advanced Mobility Group (AMG).

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
None recommended.

7.10 Packet Pg. 151
ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Agreement
Exhibit A. Proposal
Exhibit B. Fee Proposal
Prepared by: Philip Ho, Senior Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.10 Packet Pg. 152
RESOLUTION NO. -22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE

A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ADVANCED MOBILITY GROUP TO

PREPARE A LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN
WHEREAS, the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) requires all local agencies, including the City of Pleasant Hill, to prepare a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) in order to be eligible to pursue current and future Federal, State, and Regional transportation grant funds; and
WHEREAS, the Local Roadway Safety Plan provides the City of Pleasant Hill with a citywide framework to develop projects to address multi-modal transportation safety needs for all users, including bicycles, pedestrians, and vehicles, and to prioritize implementation; and WHEREAS, in 2019, Caltrans allocated an LRSP State Grant of $40,000 to the City of Pleasant Hill to fund the preparation of a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP); and WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill desires to utilize the professional services of Advanced Mobility Group (AMG) for preliminary engineering to prepare a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP); and
WHEREAS, Advanced Mobility Group (AMG) has submitted a proposal to the Public Works and Community Development Department, which is complete and acceptable; and WHEREAS, Advanced Mobility Group (AMG) has submitted a fee proposal for an amount not-to-exceed $40,000 based on time and materials;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that the City Manager is authorized to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group for engineering services to prepare a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) in the amount not to exceed forty thousand dollars ($40,000).
[Signatures on Following Page]

7.10.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 1
st day of August, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:

Professional Services Agreement

7.10.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) 1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 13th day of July, 2022, by and between the City of Pleasant Hill ("City") and Advanced Mobility Group, ("Consultant").

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement; and
B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification, and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

The Recitals listed above are hereby incorporated into and shall constitute a part of this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall furnish the following services in a professional manner:

Consultant shall perform the Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) services described on Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A, subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time.

2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until all authorized work is approved by the City. All such work shall be completed no later than December 31, 2022.

3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed $39,500.00 without additional authorization from the City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment.

4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. When payments made by City equal 90% of the maximum fee provided for in this Agreement, no further payments shall be made until the final work under this Agreement has been accepted by City.

5. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notes and internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request.

7.10.b
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Professional Services Agreement (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) 2 6 Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City's employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights.

7. Interest of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates, and professional employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant will not:
a. make a governmental decision whether to:

1. approve a rate, rule, or regulation;

2. adopt or enforce a law;

3. issue, deny, suspend, or revoke any permit, license, application, certificate, approval, order, or similar authorization or entitlement;

4. authorize the City to enter into, modify, or renew a contract provided it is the type of contract that requires agency approval;

5. grant City approval to a contract that requires agency approval and to which the City is a party, or to the specifications for such a contract;

6. grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study, or similar item;

7. adopt, or grant City approval of, policies, standards, or guidelines for the agency, or for any subdivision thereof; or
b. serve in a staff capacity with the City and in that capacity participate in making a governmental decision as defined in 2 California Code of Regulations (“C.C.R”) § 18704(a) and (b) or perform the same or substantially all the same duties for the City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in the City’s Conflict of Interest Code under 2 C.C.R. § 87302. (2 C.C.R. § 18700.3.)

8. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement.

Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in

7.10.b
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Professional Services Agreement (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) 3 accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise.

9. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all related costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the performance of this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers.

10. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies. To the extent that any portion of the following requirements are satisfied through excess or umbrella coverage, such coverage shall be maintained on the same terms as are required for the primary policies under this Agreement. i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's employees.

Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for City. ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit.

iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than two million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by the Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) on a claimsmade annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per occurrence basis.

7.10.b
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Professional Services Agreement (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) 4 b. Policy Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. The City of Pleasant Hill, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.

If Consultant maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums specified herein, City shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.
v. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice has been received by the City. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions. d. Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein.

Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement.
e. Wasting Policies. No policy required herein shall include a “wasting” policy limit (i.e. limit that is eroded by the cost of defense).

f. Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer or contractor may require from Consultant by virtue of the payment of any loss. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsements that may be necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

7.10.b
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Professional Services Agreement (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) 5 11. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations.

12. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Pleasant Hill business license.

13. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Contra Costa, Martinez, California.

14. Written Notification. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice, demand, etc. shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth herein below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of Pleasant Hill
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3323
Attn: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
(925) 671-5261. Email: [email protected]
If to Consultant: Advanced Mobility Group
3003 Oak Road, Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Attn: Christopher Thnay, Senior Principal
(925) 322-9921. Email: [email protected]

15. Consultant's Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these

7.10.b
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Professional Services Agreement (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) 6 officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request by any of the above named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor-in-interest.

16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

17. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

18. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder.

19. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees.

20. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

21. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement shall be permitted only with the express consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law.

22. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon fifteen days' written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination.

7.10.b
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Professional Services Agreement (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL: CONSULTANT:
__________________________ By:

June W. Catalano, City Manager
Title:

Business License #
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________ __________________________
Janet E. Coleson, City Attorney Danielle K. Habr, City Clerk Attachments:

Exhibit A. Proposal
Exhibit B. Fee Proposal

7.10.b
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Professional Services Agreement (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP |

Proposal to Provide
Professional Services
for the Local Roadway
Safety Plan (LRSP)
to the City of Pleasant Hill | July 8, 2022

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group)

Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP

1. Cover Letter
July 8, 2022
Mr. Philip Ho
City of Pleasant Hill
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Email: [email protected]
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Local Roadway Safety Plan
Dear Philip,
Advanced Mobility Group (AMG) is pleased to provide the City of Pleasant Hill with the attached proposal to provide Professional Services for the Local Roadway Safety Plan, which confirms our extensive experience and qualifications to meet the requirements of this Request for Proposal (RFP).

We affirm that our proposed Project Manager and key staff have the experience completing projects similar to those described in the Scope of Work.

AMG staff has extensive expertise in safety assessments; complete streets; pedestrian/bike improvements; public outreach; feasibility analysis; design plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E); and grant application support for transportation improvement projects. We not only provide practical and feasible solutions, but solutions that are implementable, cost‐effective, and innovative to achieve the maximum efficiency and enhance safety of the transportation system. For this effort, we have put together a team of transportation engineering professionals who have demonstrated capabilities to meet the technical and managerial challenges that are expected on this project.

We have conducted a preliminary collision analysis of the City of Pleasant Hill to understand some of the challenges and opportunities, to implement a Safe Systems Approach and address Equity in the City. Based on this preliminary effort, we have identified an initial list of priority corridors and intersections for safety improvements within the City. The analysis conducted is a head‐start to the project. We will work closely with the City and other stakeholders to develop and prioritize proposed recommendations for improvement.

I, Christopher Thnay, PE, will lead the team for your Local Roadway Safety Plan project. With more than 35 years of experience, I have proactively managed various traffic engineering and planning projects involving creative solutions, complex analysis, and presentations to stakeholders.

The following are the highlights of our proposal and reasons why we think that we are qualified to perform the Local Roadway Safety Plan project for the City of Pleasant Hill:

Our team of experts is tailored to your project. I will manage the project and I bring over 35 years of experience in Complete Street Safety Assessments, PS&E design, pedestrian/bicycle safety assessment, traffic operations, and multi‐modal planning in California. I will be supported by Joy Bhattacharya, PE, PTOE, who will be the PIC and will perform QA/QC.  He has  extensive experience in pedestrian and bicycle safety audits, traffic operational analysis including corridor improvements, traffic signal timings and development of complex microsimulation models.  He will play an active role from project evaluation to selection of countermeasures.   The project team will develop and evaluate

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group)

Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP and prioritize recommendations for safety improvements within the City. We have assembled the best qualified team to offer services listed in the RFP.

Experience with Similar Projects ‐ We have had extensive experience on similar projects that required multi‐modal approach, including traffic engineering, public outreach, safety analysis, bike/ped safety, and innovative solutions. We have thorough knowledge of national industry standards, appropriate Caltrans manuals and procedures, and City of Pleasant Hill standards. Key AMG staff have worked on several multimodal safety projects in various jurisdictions in California, including but not limited to the Cities of Concord, Danville, Perris, Rancho Cordova, Hayward, San Mateo County, Palo Alto, San Carlos and others. Our staff’s extensive experience in the Bay Area, includes more than 35 years on numerous multi‐modal and complete streets projects, making us a well‐suited partner, committed to continuing this service to your community.

Consensus Building. We have extensive experience in public outreach and participating in public meetings for neighborhood consensus building. AMG have worked on many public outreach projects in Contra Costa County including annual school outreach programs for the past 4‐5 years.

Thank you in advance for considering our proposal. We accept the City of Pleasant Hill’s Contract and Insurance requirements described in this RFP. AMG is not aware of any recent, current, or anticipated contractual obligations which will pose a potential conflict with the work on this project. As the Senior Principal of AMG, I am authorized to negotiate and contractually bind AMG. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,
Christopher Thnay, PE, AICP,
Senior Principal
3003 Oak Road, Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.322.9921
[email protected]

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP TABLE OF CONTENTS   1. Cover Letter ........................................................................................................................ i

2. Project Team...................................................................................................................... 1 Team Experience....................................................................................................... 3 Complete Street/Bicycle and Pedestrian Design........................................................ 3 Roadway Geometrics/Signing and Striping/PS&E .....................................................4 Funding and Grant Support.......................................................................................4 Relevant Project Experience......................................................................................6 Key Staff References ............................................................................................... 10

3. Project Approach.............................................................................................................. 11

4. Proposed Scope of Services ............................................................................................. 13 Task A ‐ Project Management and Coordination ..................................................... 13 Task B ‐ Identify and Engage Stakeholders.............................................................. 13 Task C ‐ Data Collection And Review ....................................................................... 15 Task D ‐ Identify Priority Projects and Countermeasures......................................... 17 Task E ‐ Funding Opportunities ............................................................................... 21 Task F ‐ Develop Final LRSP .................................................................................... 21

5. Consent............................................................................................................................ 22

6. Conflict of Interest ........................................................................................................... 22

7. Fee Proposal..................................................................................................................... 22

APPENDICES
A. RESUMES
B. PROJECT EXAMPLE
C. PROPOSED SCHEDULE

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP | 1

2. ProjectTeam
We understand that continuity of staff is critical to successfully complete your important project. Our team is qualified to complete the project outlined in the RFP. The AMG team will be led by our proposed Project Manager, Christopher Thnay, PE, AICP, a licensed Traffic Engineer in the State of California. Our team is organized to deliver optimum and efficient responsive services under this contract. The structure of our team shown in the organization chart below establishes streamlined management, a clear chain of communication, and team member accountability in providing the expertise and support needed for this effort.

Short Bios are included for key staff, full resumes including project information as requested in the RFP are included in Appendix A.

Christopher Thnay | Project Manager & Outreach Lead
 City of Palo Alto traffic engineer (7 years), Planning Commissioner (11 years) and extensive on‐call traffic impact analysis and traffic forecasting experience  Managed more than 20 years of on‐call experience throughout the Bay Area  Proven track record throughout his 30‐year career
 MS, Stanford University – Transportation Planning & Management; BS, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Civil & Env. Engineering; Fellow‐ITE Christopher has more than 35 years of experience in transportation engineering for large planning and operation projects around the San Francisco Bay Area. Christopher has served as project manager for many projects including citywide safety audits, Complete Streets, neighborhood traffic calming, safety analysis, signal timing, corridor study, roundabout design, EIR and operation projects. He has the necessary skills and experience to analyze traffic and neighborhood conditions; develop and evaluate alternative solutions; and work closely with the public, as well as various agencies.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP | 2 Joy Bhattacharya, PE, PTOE | PIC & QA/QC
 On‐Call & ITS experience
 Managed more than 200 on‐call projects throughout the San Francisco Bay area  Proven leader throughout his 22‐year career
 MS, Transportation Engineering ‐ University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; BS, Civil Engineering ‐ Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal With over 25 years of experience in PS&E design, parking design and safety assessments, traffic operations, ITS, and Adaptive Responsive Traffic Signal Systems in California, specifically the Bay Area, Joy will be leading the team on this project and will provide senior and technical review. He has in‐ depth experience in the development, design, and implementation of various engineering strategies in major metropolitan areas. His experience includes Adaptive/Responsive Traffic Signal Systems and Transit Priority Systems; preparation of Incident Management Plans; design of fully automated Electronic Toll Collection systems; preparation of PS&E for field implementation of CCTV, Changeable Message Signs, Highway Advisory Radio, Ramp Metering and ATMS systems; and freeway and arterial operations using micro‐simulation.

Shruti Shrivastava | System Review/Collision Analysis Lead  Traffic Operational Analysis
 Transportation Planning & Complete Streets
 Traffic Signal Coordination
 Adaptive Traffic Control Systems
 MS, Engineering from Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, USA  BS, Civil & Environmental Engineering, Sardar Patel College of Engineering, India
Shruti Shrivastava has over eight years of experience in multimodal and complete streets studies, signal coordination, traffic control systems, traffic operational analysis, simulation and modeling, and parking studies. She has extensive experience in macro and microscopic traffic simulation software’s and model development and application. Shruti has worked on numerous signal coordination projects throughout the San Francisco Bay Area including MTC’s PASS Projects for 2013‐2018. She has experience with a variety of software packages including Synchro, SimTraffic, SIDRA, VISSIM and HCS.

Vasavi Pannala, PE | Identify Strategies/Prioritization Lead  Proven track record of delivering projects on time and within budget  Expertise in traffic and transit operations analysis
 Managed, analyzed, and implemented multiple Bus Rapid Transit projects  Developed bus stop location guidelines
 MS, Transportation Engineering ‐ West Virginia University, Morgantown; BS, Civil Engineering ‐ Andhra University, India
Vasavi is a licensed Civil Engineer with more than 18 years of experience in various traffic and transportation engineering projects. As a project manager, she has a proven record of completing projects on time and within budget. Technical experience includes systems engineering, transit operational analysis, traffic signal design, traffic operational analysis, Intelligent Transportation Systems design, traffic control and lighting design. High‐profile Bay Area projects to her credit include I‐80 ICM and I‐880 Express Lanes.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP | 3 Chris Higbee, PE | Collision Analysis and Conceptual Design Chris will assist in design, collision analysis and cost estimate. He has 8 years of experience in the field of transportation engineering, including civil engineering and transportation planning. He routinely completes and supports traffic calming safety assessment studies, impact analyses, pedestrian enhancement, bicycle facility, traffic signal design, roundabout design, level of service reports, cost estimates, speed surveys, and parking studies.  He is a graduate of the California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.

TEAM EXPERIENCE
AMG is a California Corporation and certified Small Business Enterprise (SBE), established by Habib Shamskhou in 2018 to provide specialized innovative transportation services to our public and private sector clients. AMG is staffed by a 30‐member team with offices located at 3003 Oak Road, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, CA 94597.

With the advancement of technological evolution, there is no doubt that we are in a new era of transportation. AMG is one step ahead of emerging trends – changing the world for a better and more livable community by assisting our clients to navigate, plan, program and build a sustainable future by redefining mobility. This evolution is expected to improve user choice of transportation options, reduce negative environmental impacts, and significantly improve road and traffic safety.

AMG is uniquely qualified to provide the scope of services detailed in the RFP. Our team specializes in low‐impact, sustainable, multi‐modal solutions that are context‐driven, strategic, and comprehensive.

We work with our local clients to improve the vitality of communities by integrating transit, bicycle, and pedestrian modes in designs that not only promote a healthy lifestyle, improve overall mobility, and provide optimal whole‐system solutions but are also aesthetically pleasing. AMG staff live in the communities in which we serve and are therefore invested in inspiring sustainable transportation systems and designing livable environments. Services include development of master plans, feasibility and strategy studies, neighborhood structure plans, corridor studies, circulation and parking studies, design guidelines, funding strategies, multi‐modal assessments, conceptual design and civil engineering final design. Our multidisciplinary approach includes public consultation, visualization, landscape architecture, lighting, signage, traffic operations, ITS, and environmental engineering.

Complete Street/Bicycle and Pedestrian Design
A Complete Street accommodates all users regardless of ability. There are many interpretations of the previous statement, but most share a common understanding of the term “all users” to represent a range of transportation modes from walking to freight movement, as well as the activities generated by adjacent land uses, such as sidewalk cafés, on‐street & off‐street parking, urban forestry and open space, and social interaction. The term, “regardless of ability” commonly refers to streets that remove obstacles for the mobility of disabled people, children, senior citizens, and others with unique transportation needs.

We make the most of its comprehensive array of services, knowledge, and experience to better serve clients with the planning and design of streets and Complete Streets. We understand that designing streets for all users involves a multidisciplinary approach. Our approach includes peeling back the layers

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP | 4 of a street’s obvious and visible functions to fully understand its hidden, lesser known, and indirect functions—functions and infrastructure unrelated to multimodal mobility, but important when truly considering all users. With this understanding we can provide reasonable and practical solutions that do not detract from the roadway and transportation network functionality.

Roadway Geometrics/Signing and Striping/PS&E
We have the expertise necessary to provide a full range of roadway geometric design and the ability to prepare the PS&E documents for signing and striping plans. Signing and striping plans convey information about traffic control devices required for the improvements planned for construction.

Traffic control devices include regulatory, warning, guide signs, on‐pavement striping, and other markings. Our geometric design and signing and striping plans verify public safety and accommodate all modes of transportation, including on‐street parking, bicycle and traffic lanes, pedestrian crossings, visibility, and other transportation solutions for community related concerns. Over the years, we have developed internal geometrics and signing and striping plan checking procedures that are utilized to provide a quality‐controlled PS&E package.
replace petroleum fuel with digital fuel, it is necessary to not only rethink but “redefined mobility”, leveraging rapid advances in technology to enable our communities and grow our local economy with accessible, affordable, and abundant transportation options.

Funding and Grant Support
AMG team members have provided programming assistance to various transportation authorities and CMA’s in the Bay Area region. The team’s familiarity with the multiple agencies involved in programming allows us to identify creative strategies that increase the likelihood of securing external funds. Our understanding of current regional, state, and federal funding policies and procedures allows us to be flexible and responsive to changing requirements. Constrained local and state budgets, combined with limited resources are making funding programs increasingly more competitive and highlight the need for creative financing techniques.

The AMG Team will work to efficiently to identify and pursue discretionary grant programs, as well as alternative financing mechanisms. Our services include research and analysis, writing and graphic design, management, and cash flow projection, and reporting and compliance. AMG’s team secured $447.2 million in Proposition 1B Infrastructure Bond Funds in Alameda County to fund multiple capital improvement projects of critical regional importance.

AMG has successfully helped our clients secure an additional $20 million in state and federal funding, through various competitive innovation grant programs to develop and deliver critical transportation projects.

We have worked with several cities and agencies on HSIP, IDEA, ATP, OBAG, Section 130 and other types of grant applications. Our extensive experience will help streamline the process, seamlessly bringing your project to completion. Our specialized and experienced staff have the credentials you need—we are ideally suited for all your projects. We have in‐depth experience on all types of grant application projects, from preliminary evaluation through final grant submission.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP | 5 Our team members have worked on many safety
and roadway improvement projects in the past
including:
• City of Rancho Cordova Complete Streets
Safety Assessment program
• City of Rancho Cordova: Systemic Safety
Analysis Report (SSAR)
• City of Oakland: HSIP Cycle 8 Grant
Application Technical Assistance
• City of Union City LRSP
• Kaiser Permanente RRFB Pedestrian
Crossing, City of Roseville
• City of San Carlos: Neighborhood Traffic
Management Program (NTMP)
• City of San Carlos: San Carlos Avenue
Pedestrian Safety Improvement
• City of San Carlos: St. Francis Avenue Traffic
Calming
• Alisal Avenue Complete Street Project, City
of Salinas

• Arundel Elementary School SRTS Project,
San Carlos
• City of Patterson: Salado Avenue/7th Street
Roundabout Speed Reduction Project
• Town of Los Gatos: Ferris‐Englewood Traffic
Calming
• City of Los Altos: San Antonio Road
Pedestrian Safety Improvements Project
• City of Palo Alto: 2016‐2017 Engineering
Traffic Surveys & Target Speed Traffic
Calming
• City of Palo Alto: Charleston‐Arastradero
Corridor Road‐Diet
• City of El Cerrito: Citywide Safety Audit
Study
• City of El Cerrito: Neighborhood Traffic
Management Program (NTMP)
• Marin County: Miller Creek Road
Interchange Traffic Calming Evaluation and
Design
• City of Orinda: Intersection Safety Study
Exhibit 1: AMG Staff Safety and Complete Streets Project

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for Pleasant Hill LRSP | 6

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
PROJECT 1: CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

PROGRAM (SSARP/LRSP)

NAME OF CLIENT CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
LOCATION City of Rancho Cordova

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The project includes extensive citywide collision analysis and general infrastructure improvement countermeasures. Through careful evaluation of the existing corridor conditions and collision patterns, our Team identified the potential improvement countermeasures based on Caltrans Local Road Safety Manual (LRSM).

AMG Team developed 30 percent engineering conceptual designs for 4 selected corridors. The concept plans were created based on the Highway Design Manual and City of Rancho Cordova standards. The 30 percent concept plans served as a basis in determining B/C ratios for HSIP applications which were successfully awarded $1.9M in the recent HSIP Cycle 9. The final report adhered to the LRSP Guidelines.

START DATE Nov‐17
COMPLETION DATE Aug‐18
CONTRACT AMOUNT $65,000

RESPONDENT'S SCOPE &

ROLE IN THE PROJECT
Prime consultant.  Developed 30 percent engineering conceptual designs for 4 selected corridors and submit HSIP application.

CLIENT REFERENCE
NAME Byron Tang, P.E., T.E
POSITION Sr. Civil Engineer
PHONE (916) 851‐8906
EMAIL [email protected]

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 7 PROJECT 2: CITY OF OAKLAND HSIP CYCLE 8 GRANT APPLICATION TECHNICAL

ASSISTANCE

NAME OF CLIENT CITY OF OAKLAND
LOCATION City of Oakland

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
AMG assisted the City of Oakland to identify and prepare HSIP grant applications for safety improvements along five corridors. The corridors that were analyzed as part of the project included 35th Avenue, 73rd Avenue, Bancroft Avenue, Fruitvale Avenue, and High Street.

For each corridor, AMG analyzed the history of collisions in the corridor on an intersection‐by‐intersection basis, with particular attention to collisions that resulted in a fatality and/or a severe injury. Collisions that involved a pedestrian or cyclists were also given additional attention.

Multiple improvements were recommended for each corridor, including HAWK, RRFB, bicycle lanes, protected left‐turn signal phasing, pedestrian pushbuttons, safety lights, pedestrian count down signals, high visibility crosswalks, etc.

The cost estimates, benefits, and B/C ratio for each corridor were estimated as follows:
 35th Avenue: Benefit: $33M, Cost: $2.9M, B/C: 11.4
 73rd Avenue & Bancroft Avenue: Benefit: $49.8M, Cost: $4.8M, B/C: 10.5
 Fruitvale Avenue: Benefit: $25.7M, Cost: $1.5M, B/C: 17.5  High Street: Benefit: $33.3M, Cost: $2.0M, B/C: 15.9
AMG assisted the City in applying for HSIP funding. The City was able to secure total funding of $10M for the 5 corridors as part of the HSIP 8 cycle.

START DATE 2017
COMPLETION DATE 2018
CONTRACT AMOUNT $100,000

RESPONDENT'S SCOPE &

ROLE IN THE PROJECT
Prime.  AMG prepared the HSIP 8 application & secure total funding of $10M for the 5 corridors as part of the HSIP 8 cycle.

CLIENT REFERENCE
NAME Philip Ho, P.E.

POSITION Transportation Engineer (formerly)
PHONE 925‐ 671‐5203
EMAIL [email protected]

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 8 PROJECT 3: TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN (TIMP)

NAME OF CLIENT CITY OF PATTERSON
LOCATION City of Patterson

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
AMG prepared the Transportation Infrastructure Master
Plan (TIMP) for the City of Patterson. The project started in 2011 and was completed in 2020.  AMG staff lead several public meetings and presented findings to the Council.

The purpose of the TIMP is to provide a short‐term (10‐year look) and long‐term (20‐year out) guide to the City on
infrastructure improvements by anticipating and
accommodating growth in a way that maintains an
acceptable quality of life for Patterson residents,
businesses, and visitors alike.

The goal of the TIMP is an attempt to identify Patterson’s existing and future roadway infrastructure problem areas and potential solutions that may occur through a
combination of public and private infrastructure
investments.

The TIMP focus is multi‐modal with emphasis on bicycle, pedestrian, and transit services.

With an adopted TIMP, its findings can be used as a tool to help the City plan for anticipated growth in the future based on its adopted General Plan and approved projects.

START DATE 2016
COMPLETION DATE 2020
CONTRACT AMOUNT $180,000

RESPONDENT'S SCOPE & ROLE IN THE

PROJECT
Prime.  Conducted evaluation and present findings to
Board.  Adopted.

CLIENT REFERENCE
NAME Mike Willett
POSITION Public Works Director
PHONE 209.895.8065
EMAIL [email protected]

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 9 PROJECT 4: DOWNTOWN PARKING GARAGE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STUDY

NAME OF CLIENT CITY OF SAN MATEO
LOCATION City of San Mateo

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
This project evaluates existing conditions, identify pedestrian safety concerns, and provide recommendations and design plans to improve pedestrian safety at entrance and exit locations at three City‐owned parking garages within
Downtown San Mateo. The three parking garages included in the study are Central Parking Garage, Main Street Garage and 2nd and El Camino Parking Garage.

The safety issues observed included limited sight visibility, lack of pedestrian safety features such as visual and audible feedback devices, and ADA compliant treatments. Other issues observed included but are not limited to dim lighting, need for signing and striping upgrades and security.

Pedestrian safety features including vehicle warning electronic signage, audible alarms, convex mirrors, motion detectors, flashing LED pedestrian warning signs, different
textured/colored sidewalks, and clear and visible wayfinding signs in front of parking garages and high visibility crosswalks were some of the proposed recommendations.

General and site‐specific recommendations were developed to address the issues observed. AMG prepared PS&E design plans, cost estimates and environmental documents.

START DATE 2019
COMPLETION DATE On‐going
CONTRACT AMOUNT $112,000

RESPONDENT'S SCOPE & ROLE IN

THE PROJECT
Prime.  Conducted evaluation and present findings to
stakeholders and community.

CLIENT REFERENCE
NAME Nicolette Chan
POSITION Assistant Transportation Planner
PHONE 650‐522‐7326
EMAIL [email protected]

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 10

KEY STAFF REFERENCES
Client Contact Phone Number Email Project
Christopher Thnay, PE, AICP, Project Manager
Mike Willett 209.895 .8065 [email protected] City of Patterson On‐Call Services Nader Shareghi P.E.,
D.M. CSPE (209) 831‐5607 [email protected] Mountain House CommunityServices District On‐Call Services Bozhena Palatnik,
PE
(650) 595‐7463 [email protected] City of Belmont On‐Call Services Joy Bhattacharya, PE, PTOE, PIC & QA/QC
Shabnam Yari, P.E. 510.583.4792 shabnam.yari@hayward‐ca.gov City of Hayward On‐Call Services Sai Middididi (925) 833‐6630 [email protected] City of Dublin On‐Call Services Abhishek Parikh (916) 529‐7130 [email protected] City of Concord On‐Call Services

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 11

3. ProjectApproach
Adoption of a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) is seen as being consistent with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Vision Zero framework. The process of preparing a LRSP creates a framework to identify and analyze safety problems and recommend safety improvements.

Specifically, AMG understands the LSRP shall address a Safe Systems Approach and Equity in the entirety of its approach. The LSRP will be consistent with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority’s (CCTA) Vision Zero framework/method and the Countywide Vision Zero Policy and Implementation Guide for Local Agencies and will follow a process that is tailored to the community’s needs and issues.

The City of Pleasant Hill is requesting proposals to develop their LRSP.  Our preliminary analysis of Pleasant Hill’s 5‐year collision history from 2017 to 2021 using the latest SWITRS data indicate the following trends.

1. The total number of citywide annual collisions decreased slightly annually from 2017 to 2021.

The number of annual collisions increased slightly in 2021. The city’s continuous safety efforts and COVID traffic conditions could be the factors that contributed to this reduction.

2. Nearly 4 percent of the total collisions are pedestrian and bicycle related. There has been a gradual decrease in pedestrian collisions from 2017 to 2021.  There is also a gradual decrease in bicycle collisions from 2017 to 2020 but increases in 2021.

3. Unsafe Speed was found to be the top primary collision factor (PCF) along major corridors followed by improper turning and automobile right‐of‐way.

4. Approximately 0.3 percent of the total collisions were fatal and three percent severe injuries.

5. Nearly 60% of the pedestrian and bicycle collisions occurred at an intersection.

6. Approximately 50% of the pedestrian collisions occurred when the pedestrian was crossing in the crosswalk.

7. Contra Costa Boulevard had seven of the top ten highest collision intersections during the years the collisions were studied (2017 to 2021).

Along with the collision analysis conducted, we conducted a hotspot analysis to visualize high priority areas within the City. Based on the preliminary collision analysis and visualization, the vicinity of Contra Costa Boulevard and several corridors appears to be primary area where Safe Systems Approach and Equity could be applied.

AMG is currently assisting CCTA in developing a comprehensive database of collision data using Replica, which includes data from last five years, including average daily multi‐modal trips. Replica is a data platform for the built environment which provides a holistic view into the ways mobility, land use, and economic activity intersect. A link to our preliminary efforts in the project is provided:

CCTA Collision Hot Spot
https://studio.unfolded.ai/public/bf90990e‐5e16‐4775‐8dc6‐642b5e99b9ea By hovering over an intersection, the database provides key information such as bicycle and pedestrian (bike/ped) collisions and household income.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 12 AMG aims to provide a similar platform through this project to the City of Pleasant Hill. The database will be tailored to fit Pleasant Hill’s goals and objectives and prioritized metrics. We propose to include prioritization metrics and relevant recommendations to the database for this project.

This proposal includes AMG’s approach and process in developing the LRSP with the intent to provide a guide for the City of Pleasant Hill to systematically address the conditions that lead to fatal and severe injury crashes. The LRSP will include tools for the city for proactive identification and implementation of safety opportunities, without relying solely on a reaction and response to crashes as they occur.

AMG understands that the LRSP is funded with Local and State funds and will follow all applicable Local, State, and Federal laws and regulations. Guidance for the LRSP process is provided by both the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) as well as reference to the Countywide Vision Zero Policy and Implementation Guide.  AMG will follow these guidelines and processes in developing LRSP for the City.

The workflow and the list of deliverables will follow the initial scope of work provided in the RFP with our work focused mainly on four areas.

Stakeholder Meetings: As part of the LRSP efforts, project stakeholders will be identified with the consensus of city staff and will be involved in the LRSP process. This effort is needed to keep the local perspective in consideration at the forefront of the LRSP planning effort. At the beginning of the project, the stakeholders’ input will be taken to get insight into the safety issues in the existing transportation network. Potential countermeasures and emphasis areas will be presented to the stakeholders’ group once the initial network screening and safety analysis are performed. Two virtual meetings are scheduled for community engagement.

Data and Safety Analysis: Readily available information provided by the project stakeholders and extensive field reviews will be utilized in the data and safety analysis. We will analyze crash data on a systemic basis as well as specific locations to identify citywide trends, high‐crash locations, high‐risk locations, and locations with unusual crash patterns. Identification of high‐risk locations is important to find opportunities for safety improvements to avoid collisions before they occur. Example analysis of top ten corridors with top primary collisions factors indicates the high‐crash corridors, high‐risk factors, and give insights for potential countermeasures.

Identify and Prioritize Strategies: This analysis of crash history throughout the City’s transportation network will allow identifying opportunities to improve the safety of all road users. The recommendations made in the LRSP will consider all four E’s of traffic safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education, and Emergency Services.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 13 LSRP Documentation: AMG will document the results of the process and analysis conducted, including the vision, goal, and objectives of the LRSP, data collection and field review, collision analysis, emphasis areas, safety evaluation of city’s infrastructure, safety recommendations for priority locations in a report format.

AMG staff have completed many innovative Complete Streets and safety‐driven projects and included staff with the matching skillset necessary. The staff proposed for this project have worked on several projects in Contra Costa County and understand the City’s infrastructure and safety issues.

4. Proposed Scope of Services
TASK A ‐ PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION
AMG will schedule a kick‐off meeting with the City to clearly identify and discuss project objectives, scope, schedule, and budget. This meeting will include establishing points of contact, review of critical path items, developing a work plan and schedule, identification of standards and guidelines, and communication of expectations for the project. AMG will continue to set up and manage the project, attend team meetings, and provide continuous coordination with the City. AMG will perform quality assurance and quality control prior to each milestone submittal and in conformance to City Standards.

AMG’s Project Manager will act as the single point of contact to coordinate the project with the City and will provide project updates to the City at key points throughout the entire project duration.

Services under this task will include the following:
 Kick‐off Meeting coordination and attendance
 File setup maintenance, management, and sharing
 Quality Assurance and Quality Control reviews prior to making milestone submittals to City  Monitoring the project budget
 Monitor Project schedule with key milestones
 Monthly invoices
 Data Collection by AMG
 Data to be provided by City of Pleasant Hill
AMG will request the following items from the City prior to the kick‐off meeting to better understand available information, identify needs and develop a streamlined approach for all tasks involved in the project:
 Additional Collision Data (recent five years) besides SWITRS  Historical Traffic Count Data
 Relevant Studies
 On‐going and Planned Projects
 Access (if available) to any traffic and pedestrian data sharing Deliverables: Meeting Agendas and Minutes, QA/QC Reviews, Schedule Updates, Invoices TASK B ‐ IDENTIFY AND ENGAGE STAKEHOLDERS
Community involvement is a critical component in the transportation decision‐making process, allowing for meaningful consideration and input from interested individuals. As daily users of the transportation system, the community has useful opinions, insights, and observations to share with

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 14 local agencies on the performance and needs of the transportation system. Early community engagement in the LRSP development process has the potential to helping identify key safety areas and hot spots.

AMG will work with City staff to establish leadership roles and include appropriate stakeholders that represent all modes of travel including community residents, transit agencies, railroad, business, Law Enforcement, Fire Service, EMS, School Officials and City staff.

AMG staff will prepare informational materials to help present information and solicit input about areas of concern that need to be further analyzed. All informational materials and activities will include ways for the public to provide comments on and prioritize the issues of importance to them and topics about which they would like more information. We will gather information regarding specific concerns and traffic related issues. The information gathered will help to create a dialogue on what stakeholders considers safety issues on City roadways.

AMG has provided several cities including but
not limited to City of Hayward, San Mateo, City
of Palo Alto, City of Patterson, Mountain House
and Concord public outreach support for various
projects. Our public outreach efforts have been
tailored to suit the needs and environment of
each project, city, and demography of residents.

As an example of one of our recent public
outreach efforts, AMG conducted Walking
Audits for the City of San Mateo for their
Downtown Parking Garage Pedestrian Safety
Project, which included walking with the City
Staff and Internal Review Committee to identify
deficiencies and issues experienced under
existing conditions. Upon completion of the
Walking Audit and compilation of the
deficiencies observed, a comprehensive online
public survey was developed and posted on the
City’s social media pages and website to gather
feedback from residents. The survey gathered
approximately 300 responses during the two‐week period that it was posted. We utilized all relevant feedback from residents and business owners in our recommendations which were then presented to stakeholders and the City Council.

Additionally, our 511 Contra Costa Team is pivotal in implementing and administering the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs within the County which require extensive public outreach, and engagement for the past 4‐5 years. Our youth‐oriented programs envelope the 6E’s including safety, education, encouragement, engineering, enforcement, equity, and evaluation, and our additional 7th E, empowerment. Through our SRTS program, we have worked with various Cities in Contra Costa County and schools to understand the concerns faced by parents and school officials and help address them in the most optimal way. We will bring our extensive experience in the outreach effort and development of the City of Pleasant Hill LRSP.

Our approach to the LRSP development process is summarized below.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 15 The project will include three stakeholders’ meetings :
 Meeting #1 ‐ Conduct a stakeholders meeting to present preliminary collision analysis results and gather feedback from attendees.
 Meeting #2 ‐ Conduct a stakeholders meeting to present preliminary countermeasures & Prioritization
 Meeting #3 ‐ Present the final draft at the City Council Meeting.

Stakeholder and Council Meetings
AMG will prepare meeting agendas, exhibits, and meeting packets. AMG will facilitate stakeholder meetings with the City, and other relevant stakeholders to gain insight and understand priorities. AMG will also provide graphic materials and images to facilitate input and discussion. AMG will coordinate with the City and stakeholders to maximize public engagement.

All of the feedback gathered through the different stages of outreach will be incorporated in the development of the draft and final LRSP document.

AMG will present to the City Council once feedback from stakeholder meetings have been incorporated in the Final LRSP for adoption.

Deliverables:
 Stakeholder Selection
 Stakeholder / Council Meeting Agendas,
Presentations & Summaries
TASK C ‐ DATA COLLECTION AND REVIEW
AMG will perform an in‐depth analysis of the compiled
collision data sets using a systemic approach to identify collision rates, crash trends, causes of fatalities and severe injuries, and investigate how different roadway and facility types affect safety for all modes with special emphasis on bicyclists and pedestrians.

AMG will conduct an exhaustive review of available
collision data through the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) SWITRS collision database, collision data provided by the City and other reliable sources.

With the review to have an integrated equity approach
throughout the whole LRSP process, AMG has conducted
a preliminary analysis to identify collision hot spots and overlay it with income.  Using 2021 household income
Figure 1: Collisions vs Ave. Household Income

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 16 information through Replica1, AMG overlay the top collisions for the past five years collision data and is shown in Figure 1.  The results indicated that key concentrations of collisions are generally located along major corridors  as shown by yellow blots of the heat map.  These collision hot spots areas are generally located within lower median household income along major corridors.   AMG extracted the SWITRS data out of ArcGIS and created a dynamic and interactive map as shown in the following link:

PH Hot Spots
https://studio.unfolded.ai/public/3cdf66fa‐020a‐4e96‐8e17‐8edf833d6347 AMG will request historical data and collect relevant data such as vehicle/pedestrian/bicycle volumes, traffic speeds, roadway characteristics and design measurements.

Understanding the existing pedestrian and bike facilities as well as other facilities within the City is necessary for determining both existing and future opportunities for improvements.  The Top 10 High Collision Corridors (2017‐2021) is shown in Figure 2.
1 Replica is a data platform for the built environment which provides a holistic view into the ways mobility, land use, and economic activity intersect.

Figure 2: Top 10 High Frequency Collision Corridors (2017‐2021)

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 17 Review of All Relevant Projects & Policy Documents
AMG will review all relevant planning and policy documents developed. Additionally, AMG will review on‐going and planned development and construction projects to identify proposed pedestrian and bike improvements. These could include but will not be limited to:

1. Citywide Pedestrian and Bike Master Plan

2. Downtown Plan

3. General Plan

4. Safe Routes to School

5. Countywide Vision Zero Policy and Implementation Guide

6. Local Roadway Safety Manual

7. FHWA’s Proven Safety Countermeasures
Draft and Final Data Collection Technical Memorandum
Upon completion of the Data Collection review, AMG will develop and provide the City with a technical memorandum detailing the efforts summarized above. Upon submission of the draft technical memorandum, AMG will schedule a meeting with the City to discuss findings and next steps. The final technical memorandum including feedback gathered during the presentation will be submitted to the City incorporating City’s comments.

Deliverables: Electronic Copy of Draft and Final Data Collection Technical Memorandum, Meeting with the City, Presentation Documents
TASK D ‐ IDENTIFY PRIORITY PROJECTS AND COUNTERMEASURES With the completion of Task C, we would have a good grasp of hot spots of pedestrian and bicycle collisions as well as top collision locations, roadways and major collision trends and issues.

The following are some key areas which will meet Safe System Framework strategy:

I. Anticipating Human Error
 Separating Users in Space – separate pedestrians, bicyclists, etc.  Increasing Attentiveness and Awareness
 Increasing Visibility
‐ “Daylighting” intersections
 Increasing Attentiveness
‐ warn drivers of the presence of pedestrians and bicyclists II. Accommodating Human Injury Tolerance
 Reduce Speeds – Changes to roadway designs, traffic calming treatments that reduce speeds  Reduce Impact Forces – Increase crash survivability by reducing the impact forces to include intersection design
While to this point all the information derived has been data driven, it is vitally important to provide a forum to hear from stakeholders and community interest groups their experience of safety issues in the

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 18 field.  Afterall, near collision misses are never recorded in the SWITRS database.  Research study2 found that near crashes are generally a strong predictor of crashes. It was found that those factors that are correlated with crashes exhibit similar relationships when compared to near crashes. For example, near‐crashes were overrepresented on those segments with higher traffic volumes and higher truck percentage.

Local citizens and various stakeholder groups will be given the opportunity to identify areas of concern.

They could point out emphasis areas or address concerns.   An emphasis area is an area to improve safety through a comprehensive 4‐E approach (Engineering, Encouragement, Enforcement and Education).

Naturally selection of strategies of an emphasis area should be consistent with trends, Primary Collision Factors, any deficiencies observed in the field, etc. identified during the data analysis stage conducted in Task C.

After completion of initial collision data evaluation, AMG will conduct field assessments at several high‐ crash corridors and locations to identify any potential correlation between roadways or intersection characteristics and predominant types of crashes.

It is very important to conduct this review to
understand the inherent safety issues and
identify opportunities and constraints for
feasible countermeasures. Our team would
be particularly sensitive to pedestrian and
bike safety near school zones.  AMG will
focus in on addressing any pedestrian and
bicycle safety concerns of operation for all
modes of transportation.

AMG will examine the detailed collision
reports of those locations to determine
causes and appropriate counter measures.

Are pedestrians crossing at uncontrolled
mid‐block locations when available
controlled crossings are separated far
apart?
Once we have established the emphasis
areas and gathered relevant data, AMG will
develop targeted countermeasures to
address the safety in the emphasis areas
based on the Safe Systems Approach. The
recommended countermeasures would
include design and operational
2 Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2) Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS), and police‐reported crash data from the Highway Safety Information System (HSIS)
Figure 3: LRSM Safety Mitigation Toolbox

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 19 characteristics of the emphasis areas such that they can be systematically implemented as a project later. Having over 35 years of experience in design and on‐call engineering services, we understand the importance of recommending feasible improvements that can easily implemented.

The collaboration of the "4‐Es” of Safety are key factors for the successful implementation of any safety program. The cumulative experience of other agencies has shown that when applying only one of these Es without the others would result in less than satisfactory results. Using proven countermeasures from various sources including CCTA Countywide Toolbox or Crash Reduction Factors (CRF) provided in the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM), the AMG team will incorporate most relevant countermeasures and create a prioritized list of locations and low‐cost infrastructure improvement countermeasures. This could include modifications to existing facilities, and/or recommendations for new treatment measures.

In addition, crash concentrations (system‐wide and spot locations) would be used to identify countermeasures with the highest likelihood of addressing crashes. There are significant advantages to adopt some of the most promising Crash Reduction Factors (CRM) provided in the Caltrans LRSM as adopted countermeasures will potentially score well in future funding applications (such as HSIP and CMAQ).  Some examples of countermeasures are shown in Figure 3.  Potential safety mitigation toolbox and crash reduction factors would be summarized in a matrix.

Based on 5‐year collisions data (2017‐2021), the Primary Collision Factors (PCF) of the top 10 corridors in the City with the highest collisions are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Top 10 High Collision Corridors by Highest PCF Categories (2017‐2021)

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 20 It is worth noting that of the 10 corridors, three corridors (Monument Blvd, Taylor Blvd and Viking Dr) indicated 30% or more PCF due to unsafe speed. Collisions due to Failure to Yield Right of Way  (30% or more) seems to be a key factors at two corridors: Golf Club Road (33%) followed by Cleveland Road (30%).

Countermeasures‐ Prioritize and Incorporate Strategies
The prioritization of any opportunity to improve safety of Emphasis Areas would be based on collaborative input from stakeholders in the Working Group.

It is assumed that the emphasis is on implementation of LRSP strategies that addresses unique roadway safety needs, practical approach to addressing safety needs and enable the City to provide streamline responses to safety challenges.

AMG will work with City staff and Stakeholders to develop a list of emphasis area and corresponding strategies based on several factors including the performance measures identified in previous tasks, planning level cost estimates, benefit to cost (B/C) ratio by route and location. Strategies will be recommended based on the emphasis area for types of roads, specific crash characteristics, and high‐ risk roadway characteristics based on data analysis.

Based on the City staff and Stakeholders input conducted through this project and upcoming City projects, it might be useful to classify potential LRSP projects into short‐term, mid‐term and long‐term improvements which could be further divided into three priority levels with Priority 1 being the highest priority level and Priority 3 being the lowest. Prioritization metrics could be based on the cost of implementation, available funding, benefit‐to‐cost ratio and performance measures which best satisfy Safe Systems Approach and address Equity.

Draft and Final Priority Projects & Countermeasures Technical Memorandum Upon completion of Task D, AMG will develop and provide the City with a technical memorandum detailing the efforts summarized above. Upon submission of the draft technical memorandum, AMG will schedule a meeting with the City to discuss findings and next steps.   The final technical memorandum including feedback gathered during the presentation will be submitted to the City incorporating City’s comments.

Flow Chart for Crash Analysis and Selection of Countermeasures

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 21 Deliverables: Electronic Copy of Draft and Final Priority Projects & Countermeasures Technical Memorandum, Meeting with the City, Presentation Documents TASK E ‐ FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
Identify potential funding sources for countermeasures
There are several major safety related grants that are available, some of the most commonly sought include Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ), State and Community Highway Safety Grant Program, commonly referred to as Section 402.

Examples of grants and types of eligible projects are:
 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvements Program (CMAQ) – All bike/ped projects.

Signal projects.
 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) ‐ All bike/ped projects.  Other safety projects.  Local Transportation Fund (LTF) – All bike/ped projects.  Other safety projects.  Active Transportation Program (ATP) ‐ All bike/ped projects.  Other safety projects.  Transportation Development Act (TDA) – All bike/ped projects.  Other safety projects.  Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) One Bay Area Grants (OBAG) – All bike/ped projects.  Other safety projects.
 Measure J, Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) – All bike/ped projects.  Measure J, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trail Facilities (PBTF) program ‐ All bike/ped projects.

An extensive list is contained in the Contra Costa Countywide Transportation Safety Policy and Implementation Guide.

AMG will work with City staff to prepare a list of projects likely eligible for each type of safety grant program. AMG will work with City staff to determine the most appropriate project for further consideration. As indicated earlier, for certain types of grants such as HSIP there are significant advantages to adopt countermeasures provided in the Caltrans LRSM (2020) that will potentially score well in future HSIP funding applications. This is an area where AMG has an extensive and perhaps unique experience as we have been very successful in many grant applications for multi‐agencies over multiple years.

Deliverables: Electronic Copy of Draft and Final Project Identification, Evaluation, and Prioritization Technical Memorandum.

TASK F ‐ DEVELOP FINAL LRSP
AMG will prepare a Draft and Final Local Roadway Safety Plan to document the findings of the previous Task A‐E.  The draft LRSP would be presented to stakeholders for review.  The plan will detail the whole LRSP process.

AMG will finalize the LRSP Report based on comments received from stakeholders and City staff. AMG will develop a final report that meets the needs of the City while supporting safety principles and associated data analysis typically required for funding applications.

The LRSP Plan will include strategies for implementation, as well as a methodology for annual review and update the plan every five years after it has been approved.  The review could include:

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for LRSP | 22

1. Track implementation progress of key areas

2. Evaluate the effectiveness on an annual basis

3. Identify barriers encountered during implementation and potential actions for mitigation

4. Provide input on anticipated effectiveness of future programs and activities These are measurable shorter‐term outcomes that contribute to achieving the overall LRSP plan within established time period. For example, performance measures may be set at specified time intervals measured over the life of the plan such as, “reducing overall pedestrian and bike fatalities by 20‐25% annually and an overall reduction of 25‐25 % within five years.” By continuing to enhance existing safety policies and expand safety practices across all city agencies, the goal is to arrive at the ideal outcome of zero fatalities and serious injuries Deliverables: Electronic Copy of Draft and Final LRSP Report.

5. Consent
We accept the City of Pleasant Hill’s Terms, Conditions, and Contract and Insurance requirements described in this RFP. This acceptance of terms and conditions is valid for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) days from the date of receipt thereof by the City.

6. Conflict of Interest
AMG does not anticipate any potential conflicts of interest related to this procurement. AMG certifies that no member of our team has served as an elected official, employee, board, or commission member of the City and our firm does not have any income, investment, or real property interest that may be affected by award of this contract.

7. Fee Proposal
Our proposed fee rate schedule is provided below. The method of payment should we be awarded the contract would be on a time and material reimbursement basis with a maximum “not to exceed” fee as provided in the cost proposal in a separate email.

AMG will communicate with City of Pleasant Hill via conference calls and periodic emails as the project progresses and the efforts carried out in every task will be shared. AMG will also schedule and attend any meetings and conference calls with the City and stakeholders as needed and summarized in our scope of services and project schedule.

AMG 2022 Rates
Time & Material Fee Structure
Mileage $0.6/Mile
Christopher Thnay $250 Minimum 4 hours per meeting
Joy Bhattacharya $270 (Travel included)
Shruti Shrivastava $155
Vasavi Pannala $210
Chris Higbee $155
Project Administrator $110
Hourly
Staff Rates

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services For LRSP APPENDIX A | Resumes

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Advanced Mobility Group | [email protected] | P: 925.322.9921

EDUCATION
MS, Transportation Planning
& Management ‐ Stanford
University, Stanford, CA
BS, Civil & Environmental
Engineering ‐ University of
Wisconsin, Madison, WI

REGISTRATIONS
Traffic Engineer #1771, State
of California
Certified Planner #10403,
AICP

TRAFFIC

ENGINEERING &

PLANNING
 Safety Analysis
 Traffic Operations Analysis
 Complete Streets
 Grant Applications
 Plan Checking
 Traffic Impact Fee
 Engineering Traffic Study
 Parking Evaluation
 TDM/Ped/Bike Plan
 Roads, Signals,
Developments & Land Use
Data Analysis
 Mitigation Measures
Christopher Thnay, P.E., AICP
Project Manager and Outreach Lead
Christopher has more than 35 years of experience in transportation engineering for large planning and operation projects around the San Francisco Bay Area. He is focused on fostering a healthy balance between land use and transportation needs, and has expertise in corridor studies, safety audits, traffic calming, context sensitive roadway design, traffic impact and parking studies, circulation plan, and general plan roadway policies and programs.

Project Experience
City of Rancho Cordova ‐ Systemic Safety Analysis/HSIP Application (2019) AMG provided technical design services for the Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) project. Through careful evaluation of the existing corridor conditions and collision patterns our Team will identify the potential improvement countermeasures based on Caltrans LRSM.  Our Team will develop a 30 percent engineering conceptual designs that would serve as the plans for HSIP Cycle 9 applications which secured $1.9M funds.

HSIP Cycle 8 Grant Application Technical Assistance; City of Oakland (2018) Assisted the City of Oakland to identify and prepared HSIP grant application for five corridors safety improvements. The corridors analyzed as part of the project included 35th Avenue, 73rd Avenue, Bancroft Avenue, Fruitvale Avenue, and High Street. The corridors were initially identified by the City of Oakland, which was further analyzed by staff to identify the highest collisions locations.  The City was able to secure a total funding of $10M for the 5 corridors as part of the HSIP 8 cycle.

Palo Alto Engineering Traffic Surveys & Identification of Target Speed (2017) The main objective for this project is to complete and recommend appropriate 2016 speed limits and identify an appropriate target speed for applicable streets surveyed.  The process to achieve the target speed involved evaluation, classification and identification of street attributes that support a certain target speed.

Safety & Complete Streets Projects
Assisted several cities to win the Safe Route to School (SRTS) funding for safety improvement.  Conducted study and designed RRFB plans for construction bids and completed many safety analyses using SWITRS data.

Charleston‐Arastradero Road‐Diet Corridor Improvements, Palo Alto Assisted the City of Palo Alto to complete a multi‐year effort to address transportation and urban design issues along the Charleston‐Arastradero Corridor from San Antonio Road on the east to Foothill Expressway on the west, a distance of approximately 2.5 miles.  The primary focus was to improve travel for bicycles and pedestrians.

Analyze challenges and opportunities in the corridor with an eye towards changing the four‐lane, undivided road into a facility with one through lane in each direction coupled with a landscaped median, bike lanes and other urban design features to make the road less intrusive along with increased traffic safety for all modes.  A plan was approved by the Palo Alto City Council in 2004 and the Charleston Road segments were redesigned with a trial installation of new striping in 2006.  The revised striping was a concern to many at the time, but subsequent data plus citizen reviews show that the reduction in lanes did not affect mobility for commuter vehicles, and also reduced accidents by almost 50 percent, and made crossing Charleston Road between signalized intersections much safer.

Arastradero Road, however, was more of a problem in that the volumes were as much as 30 percent higher than those on Charleston Road, and the school peak traffic in the morning currently creates half‐mile long standing traffic jams as over 500 vehicles enter

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Advanced Mobility Group | [email protected] | P: 925.322.9921 Gunn High School in a 25‐minute period.  Worked with the Palo Alto School District to modify the driveway at Gunn High with the result that once traffic enters the campus, traffic now moves freely.  The district has also been successful in promoting increased bicycle and pedestrian access to Gunn High so that now over 300 students and some teachers now commute to school on bikes and more now walk to the campus.  The “road diet” approach also allows for parking and wide bike lanes along this portion of the corridor.  The project also included extensive involvement from the community and other agencies.

Citywide Corridor Safety Audit Study, El Cerrito
Conducted a safety audit of corridors in El Cerrito.  The main objective of the study was to identify potential short‐term and long‐term improvements (including safer bike and pedestrian travel) for each of the study corridors to mitigate the collision rates.  The study corridors were based on segments of arterial and collector streets having significantly higher accident rates per million vehicle miles of travel, ranked in descending order of accident rates.  The study included evaluation of the existing traffic operation conditions, collision statistics, average daily traffic, short‐term and long‐term improvement findings.

Almost all short‐term findings dealt with signing and striping changes, or changes in signal timing.  The longer‐term findings required construction or signal modifications to the extent that new signal poles are needed.

El Cerrito and San Carlos Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP), El Cerrito Assisted the City of El Cerrito and City of San Carlos to complete the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) which represents the City’s commitment to enhance the safety and livability and relies on the active participation of its community.  The comprehensive program provides City staff and residents the resources to work together in addressing neighborhood traffic concerns such as speeding, high traffic volumes, and pedestrian and bicycle obstacles. Conducted several public hearings and presented findings to the Transportation Commission and City Council for approvals.

San Carlos Avenue Pedestrian Safety Improvement, San Carlos, CA (2015) Assisted the City to win a Safe Route to School (SRTS) funding for safety improvement on San Carlos Avenue, a very busy arterial street connecting San Carlos to Belmont and beyond.  Designed the Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFB) plans for construction bids.

Brittan Acres/St. Charles School SRTS Project, San Carlos, California (2014) The project included preparation of SRTS Plan for St. Charles School & Brittan Acres Elementary School.  Data collected included field observations and accident analysis. The recommendations were characterized under the following four E’s: Engineering, Education, Encouragement, and Enforcement. A discussion on potential alternative transportation measures for St. Charles School & Brittan Acres School were outlined in the final report. The discussions included bicycle facilities and programs, incentive programs, walk to school, school pool program, transportation program administration, and other measures, which include specific examples.

Arundel Elementary School SRTS Project, San Carlos, California (2014) Using Arundel Pedestrian Safety Assessment (PSA) report with the PSA as a base, preliminary findings based on analysis of all data, observations and input from City staff and Arundel School were developed. Adopted SRTS improvements were submitted for SRTS Funding.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Advanced Mobility Group | [email protected] | P: 415.688.0024

EDUCATION
M.S. Transportation
Engineering/Operations
Research, University of
Delaware, Newark, Delaware,
2001
M.Eng Transportation
Engineering, University of Tokyo,
Tokyo, Tokyo, 1995
B.Tech (hons) Civil, Indian
Institute of Technology,
Kharagpur, West Bengal, 1992

CA REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer #68928,
California Board for Professional
Engineers, Land Surveyors, and
Geologists
Professional Engineer #1103,
Professional Traffic Operations
Engineer

INTELLIGENT

TRANSPORTATION

SYSTEMS
 ITS System Review & Needs
Assessment
 Traffic Management Centers
 Traffic Operations
 Knowledge of Existing & Emerging
Transportation Technologies
 Innovative Congestion
Management Strategies
 Stakeholder Coordination
Joy Bhattacharya P.E., PTOE
Principle in Charge and QA/QC
Joy is AMG’s Vice President of Innovative Transportation Solutions. He has in-depth experience in the development, design and implementation of various engineering strategies in major metropolitan areas, including Adaptive/Responsive Traffic Signal Systems and Transit Priority Systems; Incident Management Plans; design of automated Electronic Toll Collection systems; preparation of PS&E for field implementation of CCTV, Changeable Message Signs, Highway Advisory Radio, Ramp Metering and ATMS systems; and freeway and arterial operations using micro-simulation. Local projects to his credit include the Mountain House ATMS, City of Hayward Adaptive Signal Systems, Webster Street SMART Corridor System, I-80 Integrated Corridor Management, and the Santa Clara VTA Capitol Corridor Transportation Study.

Project Experience
Downtown Parking Garage Pedestrian Safety Study (Phase 1 & 2), San Mateo, CA, 2019 – On-going, Project Manager
The goal of this project was to evaluate existing conditions, identify pedestrian safety concerns, and provide recommendations and design plans to improve pedestrian safety at entrance and exit locations at three City-owned parking garages within Downtown San Mateo. The three parking garages included in the study are Central Parking Garage, Main Street Garage and 2nd and El Camino Parking Garage.

The safety issues observed included limited sight visibility, lack of pedestrian safety features such as visual and audible feedback devices, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant treatments. Other issues observed included but are not limited to dim lighting, need for signing and striping upgrades and security.

Pedestrian safety features including vehicle warning electronic signage, audible alarms, convex mirrors, motion detectors, flashing LED pedestrian warning signs, different textured/colored sidewalks and clear and visible wayfinding signs in front of parking garages and high visibility crosswalks were some of the proposed recommendations. 19th Avenue-Fashion Island Boulevard Corridor Study, City of San Mateo, 2019-OnGoing, Project Manager This project included data collection, origin-destination (OD) study, proposed traffic operations enhancement strategies, and existing and cumulative conditions level of service and delay analysis under no-build conditions and with proposed alternatives.

The goal of this project was to address the issues of cut-through traffic experienced by residents as well as improve vehicle progression throughout the 19th Avenue corridor in San Mateo. The objectives of this project were to determine the feasibility of:

1. Reconstruction of the Fashion Island Boulevard/South Norfolk Street intersection to optimize vehicle throughput and progression.

2. Creation of additional travel lanes on the bridge between South Norfolk Street and Mariners Island Boulevard; and

3. Conversion of 19th Avenue between South Delaware Street and South Grant StreetGinnever Street from eastbound one-way street to a two-way roadway.

This traffic study developed short-term (1-2 years), mid-term (3-5 years) and long-term (6- 10 years) alternatives along with an implementation plan documenting level of impact, cost-effectiveness and ease of implementation, based on the objectives of the study.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Advanced Mobility Group | [email protected] | P: 415.688.0024 Alameda De Las Pulgas Corridor Traffic Study, Atherton (2019), Project Manager This project Included providing a comprehensive review of existing traffic operations along Alameda De Las Pulgas (ADLP) corridor in Atherton. The Town of Atherton had concerns regarding traffic flow and operations along the entire length of the Alameda De Las Pulgas (ADLP) corridor through the Town from Stockbridge Avenue to Camino Al Lago. Through the evaluation, recommendations including signal retiming, provision of green color surface treatment for bike lanes, conversion of existing traffic control to roundabout/signal based on available right-of-way, redesign of intersection to shorten crosswalk distance and removing crosswalk along mid-block segment were provided.

Pedestrian Safety and Accessibility Study for University of California (UC), Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2018, Project Manager
The goal of this project was to improve pedestrian safety and enhance walkability and accessibility for all pedestrians at and around the UC Berkeley campus. As a part of this project, Joy oversaw existing conditions assessment for four corridors in the vicinity of the campus. The existing conditions assessment included conducting a walking audit to determine the issues experienced, collision analysis, review of existing policies and programs, benchmarking analysis survey which categorized the University’s programs, practices and policies into three groups: Key Strengths, Enhancement Areas and Opportunity Areas and review of traffic enforcement programs. Upon review of existing infrastructure, collisions, and planning and policy documents, recommendations for improvements were developed including a safety assessment toolbox.

Pedestrian Safety and Accessibility Study for Gallo Glass Campus, Modesto, CA, 2016- 17, Project Manager
AMG staff investigated pedestrian crossing, accessibility, operational and safety conditions, at several intersections near the Gallo Glass Company and E & J Gallo Winery Campus under the supervision of Joy. This project identified deficiencies in existing pedestrian infrastructure, conducted collision, signal warrant and RRFB warrant analysis and provided recommendations for improvements at the study intersections and mid-block crosswalks, to reduce conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. AMG staff developed design plans for the proposed recommendations and provided construction support during the construction phase of the project.

San Francisco Transportation Impact Studies, San Francisco, CA, 2003-19, Project Manager
Joy has completed over 20 transportation impact analysis (TIA) studies in the City of San Francisco, as a Project Manager through the City of San Francisco On-Call contract. City of San Francisco TIA guidelines require in dept analysis of driving hazards, walking and accessibility conditions under existing conditions and with project construction. This included inventorying present, absent and discontinuous pedestrian facilities, identifying potentially or observed hazardous conditions at locations in the study area where people walk, especially along routes of travel for people walking between project and nearby transit stations/stops and evaluating pedestrian demands. The projects involved extensive data collection of street design characteristics, travel demand analysis, reviewing accessibility in and around the project area and providing mitigation measures where existing and project conditions were found deficient.

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Design, Atherton, California, 2015-16, Project Manager. This project involved improvements to the intersection of El Camino Real and Almendral Avenue.

The proposed project involved installation of a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon, safety lighting, and curb ramps to allow pedestrian access to the SamTrans bus stop ECR. Joy led the design of the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon, signing and striping. He coordinated with subconsultants and Caltrans to deliver the PS&E. Joy provided construction support for during the bid and construction phases.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) [email protected] | P: 925.360.0505

EDUCATION
M.S. Civil /Transportation
Engineering, West Virginia
University, Morgantown, West
Virginia. 2001
B.S. Civil Engineering, Andhra
University, Visakhapatnam,
India. 1999

CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Engineer #76410,
California Board for Professional
Engineers, Land Surveyors, and
Geologists

INTELLIGENT

TRANSPORTATION

SYSTEMS
 ITS System Review & Needs
Assessment
 Traffic Management Centers
 Traffic Operations
 Knowledge of Existing &
Emerging Transportation
Technologies
 Innovative Congestion
Management Strategies
 Stakeholder Coordination
 Simulation Modeling
 Lighting Design
Vasavi Pannala, P.E.

Identify Strategies and Prioritization Lead
Vasavi is a Project Manager in AMG’s Innovative Transportation Solutions group.

She is a licensed Civil Engineer with more than 18 years of experience in engineering and management, leadership and mentoring, team building and supervision, as well as creative problem solving. As a project manager, she has a proven record of completing projects on time and within budget. Technical experience includes systems engineering, transit operational analysis, traffic signal design, traffic operational analysis, Intelligent Transportation Systems design, traffic control and lighting design. She has extensive training and experience in the use of software tools including HCS, Synchro, Corsim, TRAFFIX, PARAMICS, VISSIM, Integration, Lumen Micro, AGI 32, Microstation and AUTOCAD.

Project Experience
Corridor System Management Plans, Caltrans Dist.4, CA (Deputy Project Manager).

Deputy Program manager and project coordinator for various Dist. 4 Caltrans Corridor System Management Plans (CSMP). A CSMP provides integrated management of all travel modes to facilitate the efficient and effective mobility of people and goods within California’s most congested corridors utilizing the latest techniques in micro-simulation modeling and advance technologies. Project role included client and sub-consultant coordination; supervise project administration, resource allocation, and reviewing the technical reports developed.

I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project CSMP, Alameda CTC, CA (Deputy Project Manager).

Served as deputy project manager for this Active Traffic Management (ATM) project. The project implemented and integrated of traffic and transit operations strategies including adaptive ramp metering, ramp metering priority for transit, traffic operations systems, active traffic management, and incident management along a 19.5-mile section of I-80 between the Bay Bridge Toll Plaza and the Carquinez Bridge. Technical work included review of PARAMICS traffic simulation modeling results, preparation of various traffic technical reports including Corridor System Management Plan, System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) and Concept of Operations, Systems Manager, testing and validation, and project closing.

SR 37 Transportation and Sea Level Rise Corridor Improvement Plan, MTC, CA (Project Engineer).

Served as lead engineer in prioritizing the recommendations and in preparation of the SR 37 Corridor Plan with near-mid-and long-term improvements to help address the existing transportation issues. This corridor plan is a first step of many to proactively identify opportunities and solutions to the transportation, ecosystem and sea level rise for the SR 37 corridor.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) [email protected] | P: 925.360.0505
Grand MacArthur SMART Corridor Project, Alameda CTC, Oakland, CA (Project Manager).

Vasavi served as the Project Manager for the Grand MacArthur SMART Corridor project. The project included transit and traffic operational analysis, PS&E, Systems Engineering Management Plan and Systems Integration with a primary goal of enhancing transit operations project along West Grand Avenue Corridor in Oakland, CA. Transit analysis also looked at ways to increase ridership to achieve productivity gains. The Transit Operations Analysis report documented existing conditions of AC Transit’s Transbay Route NL operations and recommended improvements to enhance transit operations in the corridor. Route structure, service headways, revenue hours and miles, fleet requirements and roadway configuration were studied to determine general characteristics of the transit route.

Ridership surveys were conducted, and demographic data was analyzed to understand ridership characteristics. Ridership patterns, route load profile, run time, dwell time, speed, and schedule reliability were analyzed to summarize Route NL operations.

Dynamic Transit Routing, Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), CA (Project Manager).

As a Project Manager on this project, Vasavi worked closely with MTC and AC Transit staff to develop a Dynamic Transit Routing plan to dynamically reroute Transbay buses across San Francisco Bay Bridge based on real-time traffic conditions. This study involved assessment of Transbay bus route operations using Swiftly software, understanding the requirements, architecture, concept of operations of AC Transit’s CAD AVL and AC Transit’s GTFS data feed. The study also assessed various traffic data sources to determine the reliability of the data to use for this application. With the implementation of this dynamic transit routing plan that AC Transit’s CAD AVL can dynamically reroute the Transbay buses based on real-time traffic and incident conditions. Swiftly is an enterprise software to help transit agencies and cities improve urban mobility by providing real-time data platform. This software can be used for analyzing transit operations, planning, scheduling and customer service applications.

AC Transit Line 97 Transit Signal Priority Project, Hayward, CA (Project Manager).

Acting as the City’s Senior Transportation Engineer, Vasavi was the Project Manager who oversaw the implementation and completion of AC Transit Line 97 Transit Signal Priority and Adaptive Traffic Signal System within the jurisdiction of City of Hayward. The project included relocation, extension and widening of bus stops as well. She oversaw the testing and validation of the TSP requirements and TSP reporting in the Adaptive Traffic Signal System software.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Advanced Mobility Group | [email protected] | P: 925.393.4727

EDUCATION
Master of Science: Traffic
Engineering; Rutgers, The State
University of New Jersey, USA
Bachelor of Science: Civil &
Environmental Engineering;
Sardar Patel College of
Engineering, India

MEMBERSHIPS
Institute of Transportation
Engineers

TRAFFIC AND

TRANSPORTATION

ENGINEERING
 Traffic Operational Analysis
 Traffic Signal Coordination
 Adaptive Traffic Control
Systems
 Traffic Modeling & Simulation
 Complete Streets Planning
 ATSPMs
 Warrant Analysis
 Bridge & Lane Closures
 Traffic Detours
 Traffic Impact Studies
Origin-Destination Analysis
 Data Reporting & Analysis
 Corridor & Circulation
Studies
 Project Management Team
Leadership
 Client Relations
 Central Management
Systems (McCain
Transparity TMS, Quicknet
Shruti Shrivastava
System Review and Collision Analysis Lead
Shruti Shrivastava has over 7 years of experience as a top-performing, quality-focused, & analytically driven engineering professional. Subject Matter Expert in signal coordination, traffic control systems, traffic operational analysis, transportation planning, parking studies, and simulation and modeling. She has extensive experience in macro and microscopic traffic simulation software’s and model development and application. She has experience with a variety of software packages including Synchro, SimTraffic, SIDRA and HCS. Shruti is a strong cross-functional team leader that mentor’s junior engineers and inspires a culture of excellence. She has a track record of leading project teams to meet project scope, budget, and deadline. She is a detail oriented multi-tasker that quickly learns new systems, operations, and performance measures and thrives in both independent and team-centered environments.

Project Experience
Downtown Parking Garage Pedestrian Safety Study (Phase 1 & 2), San Mateo, CA, 2019 – On-going, Task Lead
Task Lead for Existing Conditions Assessment and Recommended Improvements. The goal of this project was to evaluate existing conditions, identify pedestrian safety concerns, and provide recommendations and design plans to improve pedestrian safety at entrance and exit locations at three City-owned parking garages within Downtown San Mateo. The three parking garages included in the study are Central Parking Garage, Main Street Garage and 2nd and El Camino Parking Garage.

The safety issues observed included limited sight visibility, lack of pedestrian safety features such as visual and audible feedback devices, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant treatments. Other issues observed included but are not limited to dim lighting, need for signing and striping upgrades and security.

Pedestrian safety features including vehicle warning electronic signage, audible alarms, convex mirrors, motion detectors, flashing LED pedestrian warning signs, different textured/colored sidewalks and clear and visible wayfinding signs in front of parking garages and high visibility crosswalks were some of the proposed recommendations. 19th Avenue-Fashion Island Boulevard Corridor Study, City of San Mateo, 2019-OnGoing, Traffic Operations Task Lead Task Lead for traffic operational analysis which included data collection, origindestination (OD) study, proposed traffic operations enhancement strategies, and existing and cumulative conditions level of service and delay analysis under no-build conditions and with proposed alternatives.

The goal of this project was to address the issues of cut-through traffic experienced by residents as well as improve vehicle progression throughout the 19th Avenue corridor in San Mateo. The objectives of this project were to determine the feasibility of:

1. Reconstruction of the Fashion Island Boulevard/South Norfolk Street intersection to optimize vehicle throughput and progression.

2. Creation of additional travel lanes on the bridge between South Norfolk Street and Mariners Island Boulevard; and

3. Conversion of 19th Avenue between South Delaware Street and South Grant StreetGinnever Street from eastbound one-way street to a two-way roadway.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Advanced Mobility Group | [email protected] | P: 925.323.1218 Pro, Trafficware (ATMS),
Intelight (MaxView)
 Traffic Signal Controllers
(Econolite, Naztec
INTELIGHT, McCain 2070E,
Cobalt, ASC/3, 170E)
This traffic study developed short-term (1-2 years), mid-term (3-5 years) and long-term (6-10 years) alternatives along with an implementation plan documenting level of impact, cost-effectiveness, and ease of implementation, based on the objectives of the study.

Alameda De Las Pulgas Corridor Traffic Study, Atherton (2019), Traffic Engineer This project Included providing a comprehensive review of existing traffic operations along Alameda De Las Pulgas (ADLP) corridor in Atherton. The Town of Atherton had concerns regarding traffic flow and operations along the entire length of the Alameda De Las Pulgas (ADLP) corridor through the Town from Stockbridge Avenue to Camino Al Lago. Through the evaluation, recommendations including signal retiming, provision of green color surface treatment for bike lanes, conversion of existing traffic control to roundabout/signal based on available right-of-way, redesign of intersection to shorten crosswalk distance and removing crosswalk along mid-block segment were provided.

Local Traffic Flow/Long Range Planning Solutions, Atherton (2019), Lead Traffic Engineer
This project evaluated traffic operations and roadway facilities throughout the Town of Atherton to improve intersection operations and safety for pedestrians, bicycles, and autos. Additionally, origin-destination analysis was conducted throughout the town to estimate cut-through traffic. Analysis of available data, existing and cumulative conditions, field data and collision reports were conducted to develop short-term and long-term recommendations including installing signals where warrants were met, intersection redesign, providing turn-lane restrictions and turn-pockets where feasible based on available right-of-way, signal plans for metering traffic outside of the town and recommendations to improve circulation through critical school areas in the Town.

Traffic Analysis for Realignment of Talmage Road, City of Ukiah (2018), Project Manager
Evaluated alternatives for realignment of Talmage Road and prepared feasible conceptual design plans to improve existing traffic operations. Alternatives included evaluation of signal and roundabout options, realigning existing streetscape for improved circulation, traffic flow and bicycle/pedestrian safety.

Loyola Corners Complete Streets, Los Altos, CA, Town of Los Altos, 2017, Project Engineer
The project included evaluating existing parking, vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recommending alternatives and analyzing traffic operations to improve vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle circulation within the study area. It also included evaluating the vehicular LOS and delay for the alternatives and the bicycle and pedestrian level of stress for existing conditions and each of the alternatives recommended.

Agricultural Institute of Main (AIM) Parking & Circulation Study, Marin County, CA, Agricultural Institute of Marin, 2015-2016, Project Engineer Assisted with collection of traffic and circulation data and analysis in the Marin County Civic Center area where AIM is creating a permanent farmers market to replace two existing markets it operates on two locations on different days. The project includes a 27,000 square foot, two-story building, restaurant, and retail space in addition to tables and stalls for farmers, and an educational facility. The project included evaluating parking occupancy at existing parking lots, development of parking circulation and management plans for future parking facility, innovative solutions to enhance mobility and improve safety for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists.

Sperry Road at Interstate 5 Improvements Project for Stanislaus County, Caltrans, and City of Patterson (2015), Project Engineer
Managed data collection, field review, development, and validation of traffic models according to Caltrans requirements. Recommended optimal lane configurations and traffic signal phasing’s and timings, conducted ramp metering analysis.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Advanced Mobility Group | [email protected] | P: 925.393.2291

EDUCATION
B.S. Engineering, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA, 2014
Chris Higbee, PE
Design Engineer
Chris Higbee has 6 years of experience in Complete Streets design and implementation, traffic calming, parking, traffic impact, project sequencing, and congestion management. Additionally, he has prepared many transportation policies and planning documents, including development of Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plans and General Plan Circulation Elements. He has knowledge of several computer programs: AutoCAD, AutoCAD Civil 3D, Synchro, Highway Capacity Software, Google Earth Pro and Microsoft Office Suite.

Project Experience

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer #88285,
California Board for
Professional Engineers, Land
Surveyors, and Geologists

TRAFFIC AND

TRANSPORTATION

ENGINEERING
 Complete Streets Design
 Traffic Signal Design
 Roadway Design
 Rectangular Rapid Flashing
Beacons
 Traffic Operations Analysis
 Roads, Signals,
Developments & Land Use
Data Analysis
 Signing and Striping
 Traffic Control
 Project Sequencing
 Engineering Traffic Study
Downtown Parking Garage Pedestrian Safety Study (Phase 1 & 2), San Mateo, CA, 2019 – On-going, Task Lead
Task Lead for PS&E design plans for both Phase 1 and 2 of the project.The goal of this project was to evaluate existing conditions, identify pedestrian safety concerns, and provide recommendations and design plans to improve pedestrian safety at entrance and exit locations at three City-owned parking garages within Downtown San Mateo.

The three parking garages included in the study are Central Parking Garage, Main Street Garage and 2nd and El Camino Parking Garage.

The safety issues observed included limited sight visibility, lack of pedestrian safety features such as visual and audible feedback devices, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant treatments. Other issues observed included but are not limited to dim lighting, need for signing and striping upgrades and security.

Pedestrian safety features including vehicle warning electronic signage, audible alarms, convex mirrors, motion detectors, flashing LED pedestrian warning signs, different textured/colored sidewalks and clear and visible wayfinding signs in front of parking garages and high visibility crosswalks were some of the proposed recommendations.

Miner Avenue Complete Street Improvements, Stockton, CA, 2019, Lead Project Engineer
Chris prepared 60%, 90%, and 100% Signing & Striping and Fiber Optics design plans, specifications, and estimates for construction of a roundabout within the City of Stockton. The project required substantial attention to project area traffic conditions, as the roundabout implementation impacted lane configurations on both intersecting street approaches. Signing & Striping was critical to ensure appropriate traffic operations were maintained while also allowing for design vehicles to make critical traffic maneuvers through the intersection. The design was completed in August 2019 and is currently planned for bid. Chris will provide construction support services and prepare as-built drawings once construction is under way.

N. El Dorado Street Road Diet, Stockton, CA, 2020, Lead Project Engineer Chris prepared 65%, 95%, and 100% traffic signal modification design plans, specifications, and estimates for an intersection in the City of Stockton. The modification was required with implementation of a Complete Streets project for the N.

El Dorado Street Corridor, and included signal equipment upgrades, video detection implementation, and PTZ camera installation. The design was completed in March 2020 and is currently planned for bid. Chris will provide construction support services and prepare as-built drawings once construction is under way.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Advanced Mobility Group | [email protected] | P: 925.323.1218 Moraga Wy & Brookside Dr RRFB Installation, Orinda, CA, 2019, Lead Project Engineer
Chris prepared design plans for RRFB installation at an uncontrolled crosswalk in the City of Orinda. The design incorporated Signing & Striping updates for the location as well as implementation of advanced warning beacons. The design was finalized in December 2019 and the project was completed in January 2020.

Systemic Safety Analysis Report, Rancho Cordova, CA, 2017, Lead Project Engineer Chris was the lead project engineer in developing the Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) for the City of Rancho Cordova in 2017, for which he performed field review of five major corridors to assess the existing conditions from a safety perspective.

Additionally, he reviewed collision history for each corridor to determine patterns and appropriate targeted countermeasures. He then helped prepare Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant applications for the City to gather funding for the recommended improvements.

Sequencing I-80 and SR 65 Transportation Improvements Study, Placer County, California, 2015, Lead Project Engineer
In 2015, Placer County had multiple major transportation infrastructure projects for I-80 and SR 65 designed and ready for construction. Chris was the lead project engineer in helping the County assess which projects were a priority to improve safety and relieve congestion using limited funding sources. The project analyzed each designed improvement, projected travel times, and collision history, and determined the optimal sequence for construction of individual projects. The results highlighted benefits of each proposed project, focusing on travel time and safety as the key components to a higher priority for construction.

Downtown Traffic Corridor Study and Design, Hollister, CA, 2014, Lead Project Engineer)
In 2014, the City of Hollister performed a corridor study for San Benito Street, which was observed to have high speeds and cut-through traffic volumes through the downtown area. As lead project engineer, Chris and the team developed two alternative Complete Street designs to implement a road diet. Each was analyzed for operational effectiveness and scored against various selection criteria. Following extensive outreach, the recommended alternative was accepted and approved for phased implementation in February 2015. Chris then developed signing and striping plans for the downtown portion of the corridor, which included reducing the number of travel lanes from four to two with a center median, minimizing lane widths, and implementing Class III bicycle facilities to promote accessibility and comfort.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services For LRSP APPENDIX B | Project Examples

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) R81 (CA)
R81A (CA)
R81 (CA)
R81 (CA)
R81 (CA)
R81B (CA)
R81 (CA)
27B
8'
4'
10'
10'
7'
11'
6'
60' TAPER
2'
11'
11'
11'
VARIES
VARIES
6'
VARIES
VARIES
VARIES
6'
VARIES
39 39
28 22
27B 10'
27B
39A
300' (TYP)
250' (TYP)
38A
R81 (CA) R81 (CA)
R81B (CA)
R81 (CA)
R81A (CA) R81 (CA)
6'
11'
VARIES
VARIES 6'
2' VARIES
11'
50' 50' 100'
W4-2(R)
W9-1
VARIES
27B
39 39
28 39A
8 25'
13'
1 MATCH LINE A-A (SEE BELOW LEFT)

MATCH LINE A-A (SEE ABOVE RIGHT)
N
PROJECT NOTES (THIS SHEET ONLY):
4" WHITE STRIPE AT 4' ON-CENTER SPACING
4" WHITE STRIPE AT 6' ON-CENTER SPACING
INSTALL 75' OF RED CURB

BIKE LANE SYMBOL AND ARROW

GREEN BIKE LANE MARKING AT BEGINNING OF BIKE LANE
GREEN BIKE SKIPS (4'x7') WITH 4' SPACING
BUFFERED BIKE LANE FLEX POSTS WITH 6' SPACING
PARKING TEE (4'x2')
GREEK BIKE SKIPS (4'x5') WITH 4' SPACING

SHARED LANE MARKING

TYPE VI LANE DROP ARROW

YIELD PAVEMENT MARKING
GENERAL NOTES:

1. ALL PAVEMENT SYMBOLS, MARKINGS AND STRIPING SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC AND PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS (2018).

2. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PER CA MUTCD 2014 EDITION (REVISION 3).

3. ALL EXISTING CONFLICTING ROADWAY STRIPING SHALL BE REMOVED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF NEW STRIPING.

4. BIKE LANE AND MEDIAN WIDTHS SHALL VARY AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE CONSISTENT BIKE LANE BUFFER AND TRAVEL LANE WIDTHS.
1:30

SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN
1 SS-1.0

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) y- South
y-- West
-
-
y-- West
-
yj North
j: North
I- West
y:- North
-
:- West
I- West
-
IGA South
G South
-
-
-
yC: South j- North
-
:- East
j- North
-
y- South
-
G- North
-
-
-
x: South
yx South
C- West
j: South
y: West
II West
IjT East
yy- South
yT: North
-
y:- West
yG- East
-
-
- yy: South
y: South
j-- North
G- South
j- Southy: South
y: North
T- South
C: North
yTI South
:- South
-
yA East
x- North
yjT West
yj South
G: South
-
I:- South
j- West
-
T- West
IT South
Ij- South
-
IyR Sunrise Blvd p Folsom Blvd
Cy crashes UDistance less than j--k
U-k crashes could not be placed in this schematic
Straight
Stopped
Unknown
Backing
Overtaking
Sideswipe
Parked
Erratic
Out of control
Right turn
Left turn
Ufturn
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Injury
Fatality
Nighttime
DUI
Fixed objects'
General Pole
Signal Curb
Tree Animal
jrd vehicle
Extra data
Pdg ProgrammingP IncR GLy:LI-yT

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group)

TRASH TRASH

SLB SLB

SLB SLB

SLB COM
V
C

T WM ELEL COM
V
V
TRASH

TRASHTRASH
TRASH
Know what'sbelow.

Call before you dig.

R

EL DORADO ST & CHANNEL ST IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NOTES (THIS SHEET ONLY):

FURNISH AND INSTALL TS2-2 TYPE M CABINET ASSEMBLY AND FOUNDATION, AND NEMA TS 2 TYPE 2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER PER DETAIL 2 ON SHEET CD-1. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MAKE ALL WIRE CONNECTIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER FOR A FULLY FUNCTIONING HAWK SIGNAL. FURNISH AND INSTALL MANAGED ETHERNET SWITCH IN THE CABINET. CONTROLLER CABINET DOOR SHALL OPEN TO THE NORTH.

FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE III-AF SERVICE CABINET PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN ES-2D.

FURNISH AND INSTALL ONE (1) 12-STRAND SMFO CABLE AND MULE TAPE DIRECTLY TO CITY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER IN STEWART-EBERHARDT BUILDING IN EXISTING 4" FIBER CONDUIT.

FURNISH AND INSTALL 2" SERVICE CONDUIT TO EXISTING EXTERNAL METERED SERVICE VIA DIRECTIONAL BORE.

FURNISH AND INSTALL HYBRID VIDEO DETECTION CAMERA ON SIGNAL MAST ARM

FURNISH AND INSTALL IP PTZ CAMERA BELOW SIGNAL MAST ARM, FACING SOUTH FURNISH AND INSTALL NO. 6E PULL BOX
FURNISH AND INSTALL NO. 6 PULL BOX

FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW CONDUIT IN EXISTING PULL BOX
GENERAL NOTES (THIS SHEET ONLY):

1. ALL NEW POLES SHALL BE PAINTED "STOCKTON GREEN" PER CITY OF STOCKTON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ON SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH CITY INSPECTOR TO OBTAIN PAINT FORMULA.

2. ALL CONDUITS ARE NEW UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL TRIM TREES AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE SIGN VISIBILITY FOR VEHICLES.

4. SEE SHEET S-1 FOR PROPOSED STRIPING LAYOUT.

CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE

AWG CIRCUIT
RUNS
No. 14
Ø2 SIGNALS 3 3 3 3
Ø4P 2 2 2 2
PPB(Ø4P) 2 2 2 2
PPB COMMON 1 1 1 1
SPARES 3 3 3 3
TOTAL No. 14 11 11 11 11
No. 8 SIGNAL NEUTRAL 1 1 1 1
No. 2 SIGNAL SERVICE 3
PTZ POWER/DATA CABLE (CAT6) 1 1 1 1
VIDEO DETECTION CABLE 1 1 1 1
12-STRAND SMFO 1
CONDUIT SIZE (INCHES) 2-3" 3" 3" 3"

EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE
POLE
No.

STANDARD MAST
ARM

VEHICLE SIGNAL

MOUNTING PED SIGNAL

MOUNTING

APS PPB

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
TYPE HGT SIG MAST ARM POLE Ø ARROW QUAD.
27-4-100 17' 40' MAS
MAS SV-1-T SP-1-T 4 LEFT SOUTH FURNISH AND INSTALL R10-23 SIGN ON SIGNAL MAST ARM. 1-B 10' - - - SP-1-T 4 RIGHT SOUTH FURNISH AND INSTALL R3-1 SIGN ON TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE.

N CHANNEL ST

EL DORADO ST

SIGNAL PLAN

SENSOR TABLE
CHANNEL DETECTOR DETECTORS # OF ZONES NOTE
1 1
2 2A 1 ADVANCE
3 4
5 2
6 7
8 25'
135'
E-2
FINAL_rev2 PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group)

BENCH MARK REFERENCE

CALIFORNIA

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

CITY OF HAYWARD
CASE
DATE
SHEET __________ OF __________ DWG.

CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY
BY APP.

SCALE

REVISED
DESIGNED S. AU
NO.

CHECKED
DRAWN
DATEC. HIGBEE
J. BHATTACHARYA
3-2-2020
5 PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON (HAWK)
HIGH INTENSITY CROSSWALK BEACON 100% TORRANO AVE & MISSION BLVD 4

TRAFFIC SIGNING SHEET
1:20

TORRANO AVE

TORRANO AVE

MISSION BLVD
N

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) SUNRISE BOULEVARD CORRIDOR COUNTERMEASURE SELECTION SHEET SB-01 MATCHLINE A (THIS SHEET)

MATCHLINE B
(SHEET 2) MATCHLINE A (THIS SHEET)

S BRIDGE ST

ADVANCED

DETECTION

FLASHING
BEACON
SIGNAL

UPGRADES

GOLD COUNTRY BLVD GOLD EXPRESS DR

COLOMA RD

ZINFANDEL DR
SR 50 WB OFF-RAMP
SR 50 EB OFF-RAMP

FOLSOM BLVD

TRADE CENTER DR TRINITY RIVER DR
SIGNAL

UPGRADES
SIGNAL

UPGRADES
SIGNAL

UPGRADES
SIGNAL

UPGRADES
SIGNAL

UPGRADES
SIGNAL

UPGRADES
SIGNAL

UPGRADES

FLASHING

BEACON FLASHING
BEACON

FLASHING
BEACON

ADVANCED

DETECTION

ADVANCED

DETECTION

FLASHING
BEACON

FLASHING
BEACON

ADVANCED

DETECTION

ADVANCED

DETECTION

ADVANCED

DETECTION

ADVANCED

DETECTION

ADVANCED

DETECTION

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group)

BENCH MARK REFERENCE

CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

MADERA COUNTY
CASE
DATE
SHEET __________ OF __________ DWG.

CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY
BY APP.

SCALE

REVISED
DESIGNED C. HIGBEE
NO.

CHECKED
DRAWN
DATEC. HIGBEE
C. THNAY
12-15-20 3

VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
ROUNDABOUT DESIGN 30%

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY ROUNDABOUT DESIGNS:

FIRE TRUCK TURN TEMPLATES
1:20 3
RB-3 N CROCKETT WY GOODWIN WY GOODWIN WY PECK BLVD

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group)

SALADO AVE

SALADO AVE
NORTH 7TH ST
NORTH 7TH ST NORTH K ST YIELD YIELD YIELD YIELD YIELD YIELD 0 10 20 40 SCALE: 1" = 20'

SIGNING
AND

STRIPING
odellengineering.com
1165 Scenic Drive, Suite A
Modesto, CA 95350 ROUNDABOUT AT SALADO AVE AND 7TH ST IMPROVEMENT PLANS PATTERSON, CALIFORNIA 19 Know what'sbelow.

Call before you dig. R C5.0

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) StreetSmartsDiablo.org
@StSmartsDiablo @StreetSmartsDiablo
El Monte
Elementary
Walk & Roll to School
Safe Routes Map
For Your HEALTH
Walking and biking are great ways to start
the day. Daily exercise is a healthy habit that
can last a lifetime. It helps students build
strong bones, maintain a healthy body
weight, contributes to positive mental
health, and improves school performance.

For Your ENVIRONMENT
Eliminating vehicle congestion in the school
zone makes it safer for walking and biking. It
also reduces air and noise pollution for a
heathier, more comfortable environment.

For Your COMMUNITY
Walk to School! Help your student develop
independence, learn street smarts, and
build character.
 Wear a helmet while biking,
skateboarding, or riding a scooter.
 Bike on the right side.

Go with the flow, in the
same direction as cars.
 Make eye contact.

Never assume drivers
see you.
 Be predictable. Ride in a straight line,
use hand signals, obey signs, and stop
on red.
 Be visible with lights, reflectors, and
bright colors.
 Walk bikes in crosswalks and on campus.
 Stop, look, and listen before
crossing. Look left, right, and left
again.
 Make eye contact with drivers before
crossing streets or passing driveways.
 Be visible in bright, reflective clothing.
 Use crosswalks, or cross at
intersections.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services For LRSP APPENDIX C | Proposed Schedule
The following is a propose tentative schedule to expedite the project.  It will be confirmed after the kick‐off meeting.

7.10.c
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Exhibit A. Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group) Chris T.

Joy B.

Vasavi P.

Chris H.

Shruti S.

Support
Staff
Hourly Rates $250 $270 $210 $155 $155 $110
Task A ‐ Project Management & Coordination
Meetings 4 4 1,000 $
Management/Coordination 7 7 1,750 $
Task B ‐ Identify and Engage Stakeholders
Stakeholders #1 6 3 6 15 3,240 $
Stakeholders #2 6 3 6 15 3,240 $Outreach #3 City Council Presentation 8 4 12 2,620 $ Task C ‐ Data Collection and Review
Review Projects & Policy Documents 4 16 20 3,480 $
Documentation 4 6 10 1,930 $
Task D ‐ Identify Priority & Countermeasures
Collision & Roadway Analysis 4 4 8 6 12 34 6,550 $
Documentation 4 6 10 1,930 $
Task E ‐ Funding Opportunities
Identify Projects & Prioritization 6 4 12 22 4,440 $
Documentation 4 2 4 8 18 3,620 $
Task F ‐ Develop Final LRSP
Draft & Final Project Report 6 4 16 4 30 5,500 $
Total Hours By Team Member 63 20 12 6 92 4 197
Percentage By Team Member 40% 14% 6% 2% 36% 1%
Total Cost By Team Member $ 15,750 $ 5,400 $ 2,520 $ 930 $ 14,260 $ 440 $ 39,300 Contingency $ 500
Mileage $ 200
Total $ 40,000
Professional Engineering Services for Local Roadway Safety Plan Totals Hours
Total Cost
AMG
Cost ProposalCity of Pleasant Hill Local Roadway Safety Plan 7/25/2022 Y:\Proposals\Pleasant Hill\LRSP ‐ 070822\PHL RSP_ Cost & Schedule

7.10.d
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Exhibit B. Fee Proposal (Agreement with Advanced Mobility Group)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-22 AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO

THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE
ALLOCATION OF 2002 ONE BAY AREA GRANT (CYCLE 3) FUNDS

SYNOPSIS
The purpose of this item is to consider adopting a Resolution to authorize the City Engineer to request allocation of One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Cycle 3 funds to implement the Viking Drive Bikeway Improvement Project. The City is submitting an OBAG grant proposal in the amount of $2,457,000 to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The project will improve bicycle and pedestrian access and safety on Viking Drive. The scope of improvements include a Class IV Protected Bikeway, sidewalk, curb ramps, bus benches, streetlights, speed feedback sign, and crosswalk enhancements.

DISCUSSION
Background
Pursuant to MTC Resolution 4505, the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Cycle 3 program guides how MTC distributes federal transportation funds from the Federal Highway Administration to projects and programs that improve safety, spur economic development, and help the Bay Area meet climate change and emission goals. The OBAG 3 program extends four years from 2023 to 2026.

The OBAG grant has three components: Smart Signals, Safe-Routes-to-School NonInfrastructure (SRTS-NI), and Active Transportation and Safety (ATS). The City of Pleasant Hill is eligible for grant funding under the ATS component. The ATS fund allocation to CCTA is $25 million, and the grant award process is competitive. MTC designated CCTA to develop a prioritized countywide grant proposal nomination list for Contra Costa County to compete for ATS funding at the MTC regional level. CCTA and MTC will evaluate all OBAG ATS grant proposals, and MTC will make the final selection based on ranking and ATS funds availability.

7.11 Packet Pg. 210
Analysis
The Viking Drive Bikeway Improvement Project appears as an unfunded capital improvement project in the recently adopted 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget, as well as the soon-to-be-adopted 2022 General Plan Update, Transportation and Circulation Element, and the 2022 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.

Viking Drive is a key east-west collector street in the City of Pleasant Hill with a traffic volume of 10,000 vehicles per day. It provides direct access to Diablo Valley College (DVC), College Park High School, and Valley View Middle School. Viking Drive has two travel lanes (one lane each way), a Class II bicycle lane each way, and a sidewalk on the south side. Along the College Park High School frontage are two crosswalks connecting the sidewalk to the DVC parking lot and bus stop on the north side. Viking Drive has a posted speed limit of 25 MPH. Speeding and the lack of protected bicycle facilities on Viking Drive discourage bicycle use. The lack of sidewalk (along the DVC street frontage), streetlights, and high visibility pedestrian-activated crosswalks discourage walking.

The project would install a Class IV Protected Bikeway, new sidewalk (north side of street), curb ramps, bus benches, streetlights, speed feedback sign, and crosswalk enhancements. The Class IV Bikeway is separated from the travel lane by a bicycle buffer zone and high visibility vertical separators. The project will provide bicyclists and pedestrians a safe and accessible means of access along Viking Drive. The project will reduce potential vehicular conflicts involving bicycles and pedestrians, and encourage non-motorized modes of transportation for all users in the area.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated project cost is $2,457,000. The local matching requirement is $281,820, which represents 11.47% of the project cost. Should the City’s OBAG 3 grant proposal fail to receive ATS funds, the City will seek additional funding opportunities.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends adopting the proposed Resolution.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
If the City Council chooses not to adopt the proposed Resolution, the project will remain an unfunded capital improvement project.

7.11 Packet Pg. 211
ATTACHMENT(S):

Exhibit A. Project Location Map
Proposed Resolution
Prepared by: Philip Ho, Senior Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.11 Packet Pg. 212
RESOLUTION NO. -22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF 2022 ONE BAY AREA GRANT (CYCLE 3) FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay Area pursuant to Government Code Section 66500 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, MTC is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area region; and
WHEREAS, MTC is the designated recipient of federal funding administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) assigned to MTC for the programming and administration of One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Cycle 3 funds pursuant to MTC Resolution 4505; and
WHEREAS, MTC has designated the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) to develop a prioritized countywide grant proposal nomination list for Contra Costa County to compete for OBAG Active Transportation and Safety (ATS) funds at the MTC regional level; and WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill recently adopted Fiscal Year 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program Budget lists the Viking Drive Bikeway Improvement Project as an unfunded capital improvement project; and
WHEREAS, Viking Drive provides direct access to and serves Diablo Valley College, College Park High School, Valley View Middle School, homes, and businesses with a combined student population of 20,000; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of OBAG Cycle 3 funds for the Viking Drive Bikeway Improvement Project, which improves safety and access for and promotes the use of non-motorized modes of transportation such as biking and walking; and
WHEREAS, the Viking Drive Bikeway Improvement Project estimated cost is $2,457,000, and the required local match fund is $281,820, which represents 11.47% of the project cost.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that, the City of Pleasant Hill declares it is eligible to request an allocation of OBAG Cycle 3 funds pursuant to MTC Resolution 4505, and furthermore, be it RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is authorized to submit a request for OBAG Cycle 3 grant funds; and furthermore, be it

7.11.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (OBAG Cycle 3 Grant Funds) RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to MTC.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 1
st of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk
Attachment:

Exhibit A. Project Location Map

7.11.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (OBAG Cycle 3 Grant Funds)

7.11.b
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Exhibit A. Project Location Map (OBAG Cycle 3 Grant Funds)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-22 AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH SUNNY NEON,
INC. FOR THE PURCHASE AND REPLACEMENT OF LED PANELS

FOR THE LED SIGN AT CITY HALL

SYNOPSIS
The LED sign at City Hall was installed in 2018. Since then, many of the LED panels are no longer under warranty and have started to fail. Staff requests that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement for the purchase and replacement of new LED panels for the LED sign at City Hall.

DISCUSSION
Background
The LED sign at City Hall displays information on public meetings, City sponsored community events, and the names of College Park graduates. In addition, the sign also displays important notifications in the event of City emergencies.

Installed in January of 2018, the sign consists of 80 individual panels that combine to create a complete image. Since its installation, ten of the panels have failed. Whenever a panel fails, staff contacts Sunny Neon, Inc. to replace the malfunctioning panel at a cost of approximately $1,200.

The newer panels are brighter than the existing, older panels, so Sunny Neon swaps panels around and groups the newer panels together (on the bottom-right side of the sign) in an attempt to maintain some uniformity in the display. The failure rate of the panels has increased over time.

Analysis
Instead of continuing to replace each individual panel and 1) having to incur service fees each time and 2) having the panels mismatched in their brightness, Staff is recommending to replace all the panels at one time so that the new panels will display a uniform image across the sign and save on any further labor costs. The new LED panels produce a sharper, brighter display and come with a three-year warranty.

7.12 Packet Pg. 216

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost to replace all the LED panels is $38,984.38, which also includes a three-year warranty.

The Finance Division has confirmed that adequate funds are available to support this project.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Sunny Neon, Inc. for the purchase and replacement of LED panels for the LED sign at City Hall.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
The City Council could reject the proposed action.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 – Proposed Agreement
Prepared by: Ling King, Chief Technology Officer
Reviewed by: June Catalano, City Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.12 Packet Pg. 217
RESOLUTION NO. - 22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH SUNNY NEON, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE AND REPLACEMENT OF LED PANELS FOR THE

LED SIGN AT CITY HALL
WHEREAS, the City desires to have a functioning LED sign at City Hall that displays clean, uniform images; and
WHEREAS, the LED panels in the LED sign at City Hall has begun to fail and requires replacement; and
WHEREAS, the City has selected Sunny Neon, Inc., the original installers of the LED sign to procure and replace the display panels.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that the City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement (Exhibit 1) with Sunny Neon, Inc. for the purchase and replacement of LED panels for the LED sign at City Hall for an amount not to exceed $38,985.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting of the Council held on the 1
st day of August, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________________
MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk

7.12.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Sunny Neon LED Panel Replacement)

7.12.b
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Agreement (Sunny Neon LED Panel Replacement)

7.12.b
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Agreement (Sunny Neon LED Panel Replacement)

7.12.b
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Agreement (Sunny Neon LED Panel Replacement)

7.12.b
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Agreement (Sunny Neon LED Panel Replacement)

EXHIBIT A

7.12.b
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Agreement (Sunny Neon LED Panel Replacement)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: APPROVE LETTER SUPPORTING AB 988 (BAUER-KAHAN) THE

MILES HALL LIFELINE AND SUICIDE PREVENTION ACT

SYNOPSIS
The City Council received a request from the Miles Hall Foundation to send a letter in support of Assembly Bill 988 (Bauer-Kahan) – The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act, the California bill to provide funding to support around the clock non-police crisis intervention. Staff recommends that the City Council direct the City Clerk to send the proposed letter of support to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

DISCUSSION
Background
The Mayor and Council sent several letters of support for Assembly Bill 988 (Bauer-Kahan), known as The Miles Hall Lifeline Act, in 2021. The 988 Crisis Hotline was officially launched nationwide on July 16, 2022. Assembly Bill 988 (“AB 988”), which would provide funding to support around the clock non-police crisis intervention, has not yet passed. The 9-8-8 number provides call and text services for people in crisis to connect with suicide prevention and mental health crisis counselors, but does not provide mobile mental health non-police crisis services.

Analysis
AB 988, would significantly enhance the new 9-8-8 call number. Callers would be connected with around-the-clock intervention, including mobile crisis teams staffed by trained mental health professionals and trained peers instead of law enforcement. The bill would also fund interoperability between 9-8-8 and 9-1-1, allowing calls to be transferred between the two so that the most appropriate services can be provided for mental health emergencies.

The City of Pleasant Hill is supportive of AB 988 and additional measures to address the unmet behavioral health needs in Contra Costa County. The City’s support is evidenced by Police Department staff participation in A3 workstreams to provide these much-needed services to “Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime.”

7.13 Packet Pg. 224

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City to send a letter of opposition.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Library, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Send the proposed letter of opposition to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Do not send a letter of opposition.

Give direction to staff to amend the letter of opposition.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Letter of Support
Text of AB 988
Correspondence
Prepared by: Danielle K. Habr, Principal Management Analyst/City Clerk Reviewed by: Bryan Hill, Chief of Police
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.13 Packet Pg. 225
Mayor and Council
100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3323 – (925) 671-5270 www.pleasanthillca.org
August 1, 2022
The Honorable Anthony Portantino, Chair
Senate Appropriations Committee
California State Capitol, Room 412
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Support AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act Dear Chair Portantino:

The City of Pleasant Hill strongly supports Assembly Bill 988 (Bauer-Kahan), known as the Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act, to implement the national 988 behavioral health emergency response system in California so that everyone experiencing a behavioral health crisis can access life-saving care.

In October of 2020, both chambers of Congress unanimously passed, and the President signed, historic legislation, the National Suicide and Mental Health Crisis Hotline Designation Act, establishing a new phone line (988) for suicide prevention and immediate behavioral health crisis response nationwide. States are tasked with creating the framework and funding the systems to receive and respond to calls and deliver appropriate crisis care for those experiencing a behavioral health or suicide crisis.

This month, the 988 phone number became available in California and across the country, but as the calls come in, Californians in crisis will find themselves at the mercy of a county-by-county ad-hoc approach to crisis response. We have the opportunity to create a sustainable system that ensures California leads the nation in crisis response. Initial federal and state investments prepared California for the launch of the number, but they are not enough to build the sustainable crisis response system that is needed in response to those phone calls.

Ongoing costs to sustain the 988-crisis response system are significant. To create an effective crisis response system that every Californian has universal and reliable access to, it must have a permanent and sustainable funding source. AB 988 introduces a small telephone surcharge, as permitted in federal 988 legislation, set at only $0.08 per line per month for the first two years with a lifetime cap of $0.30 per line per month to fund the California crisis centers and mobile crisis teams.

Currently, a person in crisis in Los Angeles County is guaranteed a vastly different response from someone in Modoc County. It is critical to ensure first responders, behavioral health agencies, call

7.13.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Proposed Letter of Support (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) centers and healthcare providers are all providing consistent and compassionate crisis response across the state. In addition, investments in 988 coming from various federal and state sources will further complicate efforts to coordinate crisis response. AB 988 tasks the Office of Emergency Services (OES) with creating a technical advisory board at OES to ensure the integration of 988 and 911. AB 988 also tasks Health and Human Services (HHS) with developing a five-year implementation plan for 988. While HHS will be undertaking a planning process for broader crisis intervention, a distinct technical planning process for 988 is imperative.

The City of Pleasant Hill is supportive of AB 988 and additional measures to address the unmet behavioral health needs in Contra Costa County. Our support is evidenced by staff participation in “A3” workstreams to provide these much-needed services to “Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime.” AB 988 enjoys bi-partisan co-authorship from nearly one-third of the Legislature. The bill is also supported by a wide range of consumer advocates, health care providers, and others, including the National Union of Health Care Workers, the National Association of Social Workers, NAMI of California, Mental Health America of California, American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, California Psychological Association, and the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network as well as more than 2,500 individuals.

California has an extraordinary opportunity to transform our behavioral health crisis response system and save countless lives by expanding access to vital behavioral health resources all through one easy-to-remember three-digit number.

For these reasons, the City of Pleasant Hill strongly supports AB 988 and respectfully requests your support.

Sincerely,
Michael G. Harris, OD
Mayor

7.13.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Proposed Letter of Support (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 16, 2022
AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 6, 2022
AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 22, 2021
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 24, 2021
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 13, 2021
california legislature—2021–22 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 988
Introduced by Assembly Members Bauer-Kahan, Berman,
Quirk-Silva, Ting, Gipson, and Ramos
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Bloom, Gabriel, Cristina Garcia, Grayson, Low, McCarty, Mullin, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Santiago, Stone, Villapudua, Wicks, Lackey, Lee, Akilah Weber, and Wood)
(Coauthors: Senators Archuleta, Eggman, Glazer, Leyva, Wiener, Nielsen, Ochoa Bogh, and Umberg)
February 18, 2021
An act to add Article 6.3 (commencing with Section 53123.1) to Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 41007.2, 41007.3, 41013, 41020, 41021, 41022, 41023, 41024, 41028, 41030, 41031, 41032, 41046, 41050, 41098, 41100, 41128, 41135, 41136, and 41150 of, to amend the headings of Article 1 (commencing with Section 41020) and Article 2 (commencing with Section 41030) of Chapter 2 of Part 20 of Division 2 of, and to amend the heading of Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 41020) of Part 20 of Division 2 of, the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to emergency services, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.

94 7.13.b
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) le
gislative counsel
’s digest
AB 988, as amended, Bauer-Kahan. Mental health: 988 crisis hotline. (1)  Existing law, the Warren-911-Emergency Assistance Act, requires every local public agency, as defined, to have an emergency communication system and requires the digits “911” to be the primary emergency telephone number within the system.

Existing law specifies provisions governing the operation and financing of community mental health services for the mentally disordered in every county through locally administered and locally controlled community mental health programs. Existing law specifies that county mental health services should be organized to provide immediate response to individuals in precrisis and crisis and to members of the individual’s support system on a 24-hour, 7-day-per-week basis and authorizes provision of crisis services offsite as mobile services.

Existing federal law, the National Suicide Hotline Designation Act, designates the 3-digit telephone number “988” as the universal number within the United States for the purpose of the national suicide prevention and mental health crisis hotline system operating through the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline maintained by the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Abuse and the Veterans Crisis Line maintained by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

This bill would enact the Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act. The bill would require the Office of Emergency Services to ensure, no later than July 16, 2022, that designated 988 centers utilize technology that allows for transfers between 988 centers as well as between 988 centers and 911 public safety answering points. The bill would require, no later than 90 days after passage of the act, the office to appoint a 988 crisis hotline system director, among other things. The bill would require, no later than July 1, 2024, the office to ensure interoperability between and across crisis and emergency response systems used throughout the state, as described. The bill would require the office to consult with specified entities on any technology requirements for 988 centers.

This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency to designate, no later than July 16, 2022, a 988 center or centers to provide crisis intervention services and crisis care coordination to individuals accessing 988. The bill would impose additional duties on the agency and 988 centers relating to the implementation of the 988 system.
94 AB 988 —
2 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) (2)  Existing law, the Emergency
Telephone Users Surcharges Act,
generally imposes a surcharge on each access line for each month or part thereof for which a service user subscribes with a service supplier, at an amount no greater than $0.80, based on the Office of Emergency Services’ estimate of the number of access lines to which the surcharge will be applied per month for a calendar year period that it estimates, pursuant to a specified formula, will produce sufficient revenue to fund the current fiscal year’s 911 costs.

Existing law imposes a surcharge on the purchase of prepaid mobile telephony services at the time of each retail transaction in this state, at the rate equal to the monthly surcharge amount per access line, to be paid by prepaid consumers and collected by sellers, as defined. Existing law exempts certain lines from the surcharge, including lines supplying lifeline service. Existing law requires the surcharge to be remitted to, and administered by, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, in accordance with specified provisions. Existing law makes certain violations of the Emergency Telephone Users Surcharge Act a crime.

Existing law requires amounts to be paid to the state pursuant to the Emergency Telephone Users Surcharge Act to be deposited into the State Emergency Telephone Number Account and that the amounts deposited, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be spent solely for specified purposes, including payment for the installation of, and ongoing expenses for, a basic system.

This bill would create a separate surcharge, beginning January 1, 2023, on each access line for each month or part thereof for which a service user subscribes with a service supplier. The bill would set the 988 surcharge for the 2023 and 2024 calendar years at $0.08 per access line per month and, for years beginning January 1, 2025, at an amount based on a specified formula, but no greater than $0.30 per access line per month. This bill would make applicable relevant provisions of the Emergency Telephone Users Surcharge Act to the 988 surcharge, as provided, including existing surcharge exemptions. The bill would authorize the 911 and 988 surcharges to be combined into a single-line item, as described. The bill would provide for specified costs to be paid by the fees prior to distribution to the Office of Emergency Services.

The bill would make conforming changes in regard to the 988 surcharge.

This bill would create the 988 State Mental Health and Crisis Services Special Fund and would require the fees to be deposited along with other specified moneys into the fund. The bill would provide that the 94 — 3 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) funds be used, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for specified purposes, in accordance with federal law and as prioritized, including funding 988 crisis hotline centers and the operation of mobile crisis teams. The bill would require the Office of Emergency Services to require an entity seeking moneys available through the fund to annually file an expenditure and outcomes report containing specified information.
(3)  This bill would appropriate $8,035,700 from the General Fund to the 988 State Mental Health and Crisis Services Special Fund for purposes of covering the state’s first year of administrative costs in implementing the Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act and of funding designated 988 centers to support the first year of their implementation of the 988 system.
(4)  By imposing new requirements on counties and by expanding the scope of crimes imposed by the Emergency Telephone Users Surcharge Act, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.

Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(5)  This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Vote: 2⁄3. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes.

State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. (a)  It is the intent of the Legislature to implement line 2 the National Suicide Hotline Designation Act of 2020, in 94 AB 988 —
4 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 compliance with the Federal Communication Commission’s rules line 2 designating “988” as a three-digit number for the National Suicide line 3 Prevention Hotline to assure all persons residing in and visiting line 4 the State of California have access to the “988” suicide prevention line 5 and behavioral health crisis hotline and care 24 hours per day, line 6 seven days per week.
line 7 (b)  It is the intent of the Legislature that the 988 system in line 8 California operate as an emergency suicidal, mental health, and line 9 substance use disorder crisis system that provides compassionate, line 10 appropriate, and easily accessible care to reduce unnecessary line 11 hospitalizations and arrests.
line 12 (c)  It is the intent of the Legislature that:
line 13 (1)  By July 16, 2022, the congressionally established go-live line 14 date for the 988 number nationwide, 988 centers will be designated line 15 by the California Health and Human Services Agency and prepared line 16 to receive and respond to the anticipated 125-percent rise in call line 17 volume in the first year of operation of 988. To ensure the success line 18 of this transition, the Office of Emergency Services and the line 19 California Health and Human Services Agency will provide call line 20 centers with necessary technology, financing, and guidelines by line 21 July 16, 2022.
line 22 (2)  By December 31, 2023, the California Health and Human line 23 Services Agency and the Office of Emergency Services will line 24 develop a plan for the statewide coordination of 988, 911, and line 25 county behavioral health crisis services, including mobile crisis line 26 teams. The plan will be based on a five-year implementation plan line 27 that includes a landscape analysis of existing services and describes line 28 how to expand, improve, and link services to fully implement this line 29 act by January 1, 2029.
line 30 SEC. 2. Article 6.3 (commencing with Section 53123.1) is line 31 added to Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the line 32 Government Code, to read:
line 33
line 34 Article 6.3. Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act line 35
line 36 53123.1. This article shall be known, and may be cited, as the line 37 “Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act.” line 38 53123.1.5.For purposes of this article, the following definitions line 39 shall apply:
94 — 5 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 (a)  “988” means the three-digit telephone number designated line 2 by the Federal Communications Commission for the purpose of line 3 connecting individuals experiencing a mental health crisis with line 4 suicide prevention and mental health crisis counselors, mobile line 5 crisis teams, and crisis receiving and stabilization services and line 6 other behavioral health crisis services through the National Suicide line 7 Prevention Lifeline network.
line 8 (b)  “988 center” means a county-operated or county line 9 contractor-operated center, center operating on a county or regional line 10 basis and participating in the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline line 11 network to respond to statewide or regional 988 calls. line 12 (c)  “Agency” means the California Health and Human Services line 13 Agency.
line 14 (d)  “Behavioral health crisis services” means the continuum of line 15 services to address crisis intervention, crisis stabilization, and crisis line 16 residential treatment needs of those with a mental health or line 17 substance use crisis that are wellness, resiliency, and recovery line 18 oriented. These include, but are not limited to, crisis intervention, line 19 including counseling provided by 988 centers, mobile crisis teams, line 20 and crisis receiving and stabilization services. line 21 (e)  “Crisis receiving and stabilization services” means facilities line 22 with capacity for diagnosis, initial management, observation, crisis line 23 stabilization, and followup referral services. They include crisis line 24 stabilization units, sobering centers, crisis residential treatment, line 25 peer respite services, and services related to involuntary line 26 commitments under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Part 1 line 27 (commencing with Section 5000) of Division 5 of the Welfare and line 28 Institutions Code).
line 29 (f)  “Mobile crisis team” means a jurisdiction-based behavioral line 30 health team, as defined in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 line 31 (Section 1947(b)(2) of Public Law 117-2). Mobile crisis teams line 32 provide onsite interventions, including deescalation, stabilization, line 33 and referrals to behavioral health and other social services to line 34 individuals who are experiencing a behavioral health crisis. line 35 (g)  “National Suicide Prevention Lifeline” means the national line 36 network of local crisis hotline centers that provide free and line 37 confidential emergency support to people in suicidal crisis or line 38 emotional distress 24 hours per day, seven days per week via a line 39 toll-free telephone hotline number that receives calls made through line 40 the 988 system. The toll-free telephone number is maintained by 94 AB 988 —
6 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use under line 2 Section 520E-3 of the Public Health Service Act, Section line 3 290bb-36c of Title 42 of the United States Code. line 4 (h)  “Office” means the Office of Emergency Services. line 5 (i)  “Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services line 6 Administration” means that agency of the United States Department line 7 of Health and Human Services.
line 8 53123.2. (a)  No later than July 16, 2022, the Office of line 9 Emergency Services shall ensure that designated 988 centers utilize line 10 technology that allows for transfers between 988 centers, as well line 11 as between 988 centers and 911 public safety answering points. line 12 (b)  No later than 90 days after the passage of this act, the office line 13 shall do both of the following:
line 14 (1)  Appoint a 988 crisis hotline system director to implement line 15 and oversee the administration coordinating the emergency mental line 16 health crisis response with emergency crisis lines. line 17 (2)  (A)  Establish and convene the State 988 Technical Advisory line 18 Board for purposes of advising the office on both of the following:
line 19 (i)  The development of technical and operational standards for line 20 the 988 system that allow for coexistence with California’s 911 line 21 system.
line 22 (ii)  The creation of standards for 988 operators to process and line 23 dispatch the necessary mental health response and when to transfer line 24 into the “911” public answering points or points (PSAP), and vice line 25 versa.
line 26 (B)  The board shall meet no less than quarterly until December line 27 31, 2028. Following that date, the board may be disbanded at the line 28 discretion of the office.
line 29 (c)  No later than July 1, 2024, the office shall ensure line 30 interoperability between and across crisis and emergency response line 31 systems used throughout the state, including 911, emergency line 32 services, behavioral health crisis services, and other nonbehavioral line 33 health crisis services. This shall include ensuring interoperability line 34 of telephone calls, texts, chats, and other similar capabilities line 35 consistent with the county’s implementation of Next Generation line 36 911.
line 37 (d)  The office shall consult with the National Suicide Prevention line 38 Lifeline and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services line 39 Administration on any technology requirements for 988 centers. 94 — 7 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 53123.3. (a)  No later than July 16, 2022, the California Health line 2 and Human Services Agency shall designate a 988 center or centers line 3 to provide crisis intervention services and crisis care coordination line 4 to individuals accessing 988. Each designated 988 center shall do line 5 all of the following:
line 6 (1)  Meet federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services line 7 Administration requirements and national best practices guidelines line 8 for operational and clinical standards, including training line 9 requirements and policies for transferring callers to an appropriate line 10 specialized center, or subnetworks, within or external to, the line 11 National Suicide Prevention Lifeline network.
line 12 (2)  Maintain an active agreement with the administrator of the line 13 National Suicide Prevention Lifeline for participation within the line 14 network.
line 15 (3)  Comply with state technology requirements or guidelines line 16 for the operation of 988.
line 17 (b)  No later than 90 days after the passage of this act, the agency line 18 shall do both of the following:
line 19 (1)  Appoint a 988 crisis services director to provide direction line 20 and oversight of the implementation and administration of line 21 behavioral health crisis services accessed through 988. line 22 (2)  Appoint and convene a state 988 policy advisory group for line 23 purposes of advising the agency on the implementation and line 24 administration of mental health crisis services accessible through line 25 988, including advising on the agency on the creation of the line 26 five-year implementation plan described in subdivision (d). line 27 (c)  The advisory group described in paragraph (2) of subdivision line 28 (b) shall meet no less than quarterly until December 31, 2028. line 29 Following that date, the advisory group may disbanded at the line 30 discretion of the agency.
line 31 (d)  (1)  No later than December 31, 2023, the agency shall create line 32 a five-year implementation plan for a comprehensive 988 system line 33 that includes the following components:
line 34 (A)  Access to crisis counselors through telephone call, text, and line 35 chat, 24 hours per day, seven days per week.
line 36 (B)  Mobile crisis teams that operate statewide 24 hours per day, line 37 seven days per week, and can respond to individuals in crisis in a line 38 timely manner. Mobile crisis teams shall be able to respond to line 39 clearly articulated suicidal or behavioral health contracts made or line 40 routed to 988 as an alternative to law enforcement unless there is 94 AB 988 —
8 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 a medical emergenc
y, someone is in immediate danger, or there
line 2 is a reported crime where law enforcement is mandated to respond line 3 by state or federal law.
line 4 (C)  Access to crisis receiving and stabilization services. line 5 (2)  The five-year implementation plan shall include all of the line 6 following:
line 7 (A)  A state governance structure of the 988 system. line 8 (B)  Standards of care for call centers, mobile crisis teams, and line 9 behavioral health crisis services, including examples of models line 10 across the state that are in accordance with the National Suicide line 11 Hotline Designation Act of 2020, Substance Abuse and Mental line 12 Health Services Administration National Guidelines for Behavioral line 13 Health Crisis Care, and existing parity laws.
line 14 (C)  Metrics for evaluating the 988 system.
line 15 (D)  A framework for local implementation of statewide 988 line 16 policies, regulations, and guidelines for the coordination of the line 17 988 crisis response system across 988 call centers, 911, county line 18 behavioral health, public health, first responders, law enforcement line 19 agencies, and other relevant entities. The framework shall stipulate line 20 that any local plans developed must be approved by the state line 21 governing authority and include guidelines on establishing regional line 22 agreements and contracts that appropriately link call centers, line 23 mobile crisis teams, crisis receiving and stabilization centers, and line 24 other relevant county services such as additional call lines and line 25 services.
line 26 (E)  Procedures for determining the annual operating budget for line 27 the purposes of establishing the rate of the 988 surcharge and how line 28 revenue will be dispersed to fund the 988 system consistent with line 29 Section 53123.4.
line 30 (F)  Strategies for ensuring that the 988 crisis response system line 31 is adequately funded, including mechanisms for reimbursement line 32 of behavioral health emergency or crisis response pursuant to line 33 Sections 1374.72 and 1374.721 of the Health and Safety Code, line 34 including, but not limited to:
line 35 (i)  Seeking to maximize all available federal funding sources line 36 for the purposes of 988 implementation, including federal Medicaid line 37 reimbursement for services; federal Medicaid reimbursement for line 38 administrative expenses, including the development and line 39 maintenance of information technology to support the 988 system 94 — 9 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 and crisis services; and federal grants, including the funding of line 2 mental health crisis services.
line 3 (ii)  Coordinating with the Department of Insurance and line 4 Department of Managed Health Care to ensure efficient and timely line 5 reimbursement to counties for medically necessary crisis line 6 intervention, mobile crisis, crisis receiving and stabilization, and line 7 crisis residential services by health care service plans and disability line 8 insurers, pursuant to Section 1374.72 of the Health and Safety line 9 Code and Section 10144.5 of the Insurance Code and consistent line 10 with the requirements of the federal Mental Health Parity and line 11 Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (29 U.S.C. Sec. 1185a). line 12 53123.4. (a)  The 988 State Mental Health and Crisis Services line 13 Special Fund is hereby established in the State Treasury. line 14 (b)  The fund shall consist of all of the following:
line 15 (1)  Revenue generated by the 988 surcharge assessed on users line 16 under Section 41020 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which line 17 revenue shall be used solely for the operations of the 988 center line 18 and mobile crisis teams.
line 19 (2)  Appropriations made by the Legislature.
line 20 (3)  Grants and gifts intended for deposit in the fund. line 21 (4)  Interest, premiums, gains, or other earnings on the fund. line 22 (5)  Money from any other source that is deposited in or line 23 transferred to the fund.
line 24 (c)  Notwithstanding Section 11754 of the Health and Safety line 25 Code, federal funds payable directly to the state by the Substance line 26 Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to implement line 27 988 may be made directly to the fund.
line 28 (d)  Money in the fund is subject to all of the following:
line 29 (1)  Money shall not revert at the end of any fiscal year and shall line 30 remain available for the purposes of the fund in subsequent state line 31 fiscal years.
line 32 (2)  Money shall not be subject to transfer to any other fund or line 33 to transfer, assignment, or reassignment for any other use or line 34 purpose outside of those specified in this article. line 35 (3)  Money in the fund shall be available, upon appropriation by line 36 the Legislature, for the purposes specified in this article. line 37 (e)  (1)  All revenue generated by the 988 surcharge assessed on line 38 users under Section 41020 of the Revenue and Taxation Code shall line 39 only be expended the operations of the 988 center and mobile crisis line 40 teams.
94 AB 988 — 10 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 (2)  The re
venue generated by the 988 surcharge shall be
line 2 prioritized to fund:
line 3 (A)  First, the 988 centers, including the efficient and effective line 4 routing of telephone calls, personnel, and the provision of acute line 5 mental health services through telephone call, text, and chat to the line 6 988 number.
line 7 (B)  Second, the operation of mobile crisis teams. line 8 (3)  The revenue generated by the 988 surcharge shall be used line 9 to supplement and not supplant federal, state, and local funding line 10 for mobile crisis services and crisis receiving and stabilization line 11 services as calculated in the 2019–20 fiscal year. line 12 (4)  The revenue generated by the 988 surcharge may only be line 13 used to fund service and operation expenses that are not line 14 reimbursable through federal Medicaid match, Medicare, health line 15 care service plans, or disability insurers.
line 16 (f)  The Office of Emergency Services may adopt regulations line 17 regarding the process for counties to receive funds. line 18 (g)  The office shall require an entity seeking funds available line 19 through the 988 State Mental Health and Crisis Services Special line 20 Fund to annually file an expenditure and outcomes report with line 21 information including, but not limited to, the following, as line 22 applicable to each modality, including call center, mobile crisis line 23 services, and crisis receiving and stabilization services:
line 24 (1)  The total budget, by fund source.
line 25 (2)  Number and job classification of personnel allocated to each line 26 modality.
line 27 (3)  The number of individuals served.
line 28 (4)  The outcomes for individuals served.
line 29 (5)  The health coverage status of individuals served, if known. line 30 (6)  The amount billed to and reimbursed by Medi-Cal or other line 31 public and private health care service plans or insurers. line 32 (7)  Measures of system performance, including capacity, wait line 33 time, and the ability to meet demand for services. line 34 (h)  The State Treasurer shall report annually to the office on line 35 fund deposits and expenditures.
line 36 SEC. 3. Section 41007.2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code line 37 is amended to read:
line 38 41007.2. (a)  “Wireline communications service” shall mean line 39 a local exchange service provided at a physical location in this 94 — 11 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 state that allows the user to make an outbound communication to line 2 the 911 emergency communications or 988 crisis hotline. line 3 (b)  For the purposes of the surcharge imposed by Chapter 2 line 4 (commencing with Section 41020):
line 5 (1)  A wireline communications service access line does not line 6 include a direct inward dialing number, extension, or other similar line 7 feature that routes an inbound call and cannot provide access to line 8 the 911 emergency communications system.
line 9 (2)  The number of surcharges imposed shall not exceed the total line 10 number of concurrent outbound calls that can be placed to the line 11 emergency communications system at a single point of time. line 12 (c)  This definition shall apply only to this part. line 13 (d)  Commencing January 1, 2023, the definition shall include line 14 a local exchange service provided at a physical location in this line 15 state that allows the user to make an outbound communication to line 16 the 988 crisis hotline as defined in the Miles Hall Lifeline and line 17 Suicide Prevention Act (Article 6.3 (commencing with Section line 18 53123.1) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the line 19 Government Code).
line 20 SEC. 4. Section 41007.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code line 21 is amended to read:
line 22 41007.3. (a)  “Wireless communications service line” shall line 23 mean a telecommunications service provided to an end user with line 24 a place of primary use in this state that allows the end user to make line 25 an outbound communication to the 911 emergency communications line 26 system. A wireless communications service line shall not include line 27 prepaid mobile telephony service.
line 28 (b)  For the purposes of the surcharge imposed by Chapter 2 line 29 (commencing with Section 41020), not more than one surcharge line 30 may be imposed per wireless communications service line number line 31 assigned to an end user of mobile telecommunications service. line 32 (c)  This definition shall apply only to this part. line 33 (d)  Commencing January 1, 2023, the definition shall include line 34 a local exchange service provided at a physical location in this line 35 state that allows the user to make an outbound communication to line 36 the 988 crisis hotline as defined in the Miles Hall Lifeline and line 37 Suicide Prevention Act (Article 6.3 (commencing with Section line 38 53123.1) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the line 39 Government Code).
94 AB 988 — 12 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 SEC. 5. Section 41013 of the Re
venue and Taxation Code is
line 2 amended to read:
line 3 41013. “Surcharge” means a tax or taxes levied by this state. line 4 “Surcharge,” or “surcharges” as used in this part, refers to two line 5 separate charges, one related to 911 service and one related to 988 line 6 service.
line 7 SEC. 6. The heading of Chapter 2 (commencing with Section line 8 41020) of Part 20 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code line 9 is amended to read:
line 10
line 11 Chap
ter 2. The Surcharges
line 12
line 13 SEC. 7. The heading of Article 1 (commencing with Section line 14 41020) of Chapter 2 of Part 20 of Division 2 of the Revenue and line 15 Taxation Code is amended to read:
line 16
line 17 Article 1. Imposition of the Surcharges
line 18
line 19 SEC. 8. Section 41020 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 20 amended to read:
line 21 41020. (a)  (1)  (A)  On and after January 1, 2020, a 911 line 22 surcharge is hereby imposed on each access line for each month line 23 or part thereof for which a service user subscribes with a service line 24 supplier, at an amount determined under Article 2 (commencing line 25 with Section 41030). Beginning January 1, 2023, a separate 988 line 26 surcharge is hereby imposed on each access line for each month line 27 or part thereof for which a service user subscribes with a service line 28 supplier, at an amount determined under Article 2 (commencing line 29 with Section 41030).
line 30 (B)  The surcharges shall be paid by the service user as line 31 hereinafter provided.
line 32 (2)  On and after January 1, 2020, the purchase of prepaid mobile line 33 telephony services in this state shall be subject to a surcharge set line 34 forth under Article 2 (commencing with Section 41030). The line 35 surcharge shall be paid by the prepaid consumer in accordance line 36 with Section 41028 and remitted and administered in accordance line 37 with this part. Beginning January 1, 2023, a separate 988 surcharge line 38 is hereby imposed on the purchase of prepaid mobile telephony line 39 services, at an amount determined under Article 2 (commencing line 40 with Section 41030).
94 — 13 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 (b)  The surcharges imposed shall not apply to either of the line 2 following:
line 3 (1)  In accordance with the Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing line 4 Act (Public Law 106-252), which is incorporated herein by line 5 reference, to any charges for mobile telecommunications services line 6 billed to a customer where those services are provided, or deemed line 7 provided, to a customer whose place of primary use is outside this line 8 state. Mobile telecommunications services shall be deemed line 9 provided by a customer’s home service provider to the customer line 10 if those services are provided in a taxing jurisdiction to the line 11 customer, and the charges for those services are billed by or for line 12 the customer’s home service provider.
line 13 (2)  To any charges for VoIP service billed to a customer where line 14 those services are provided to a customer whose place of primary line 15 use of VoIP service is outside this state.
line 16 (c)  For purposes of this section:
line 17 (1)  “Charges for mobile telecommunications services” means line 18 any charge for, or associated with, the provision of commercial line 19 mobile radio service, as defined in Section 20.3 of Title 47 of the line 20 Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on June 1, 1999, or any line 21 charge for, or associated with, a service provided as an adjunct to line 22 a commercial mobile radio service, that is billed to the customer line 23 by or for the customer’s home service provider, regardless of line 24 whether individual transmissions originate or terminate within the line 25 licensed service area of the home service provider. line 26 (2)  “Customer” means (A) the person or entity that contracts line 27 with the home service provider for mobile telecommunications line 28 services, or with a VoIP service provider for VoIP service, or (B) line 29 if the end user of mobile telecommunications services or VoIP line 30 service is not the contracting party, the end user of the mobile line 31 telecommunications service or VoIP service. This paragraph applies line 32 only for the purpose of determining the place of primary use. The line 33 term “customer” does not include (A) a reseller of mobile line 34 telecommunications service or VoIP communication service, or line 35 (B) a serving carrier under an arrangement to serve the mobile line 36 customer outside the home service provider’s licensed service line 37 area.
line 38 (3)  “Home service provider” means the facilities-based carrier line 39 or reseller with which the customer contracts for the provision of line 40 mobile telecommunications services.
94 AB 988 — 14 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 (4)  “Licensed service area” means the geographic area in which line 2 the home service provider is authorized by law or contract to line 3 provide commercial mobile radio service to the customer. line 4 (5)  “Mobile telecommunications service” means commercial line 5 mobile radio service, as defined in Section 20.3 of Title 47 of the line 6 Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on June 1, 1999. line 7 (6)  “Place of primary use” means the street address line 8 representative of where the customer’s use of the mobile line 9 telecommunications service or VoIP service primarily occurs, that line 10 must be:
line 11 (A)  The residential street address or the primary business street line 12 address of the customer.
line 13 (B)  With respect to mobile telecommunications service, within line 14 the licensed service area of the home service provider. line 15 (7)  (A)  “Reseller” means a provider who purchases line 16 telecommunications services or VoIP service from another line 17 telecommunications service provider or VoIP service and then line 18 resells the services, or uses the services as a component part of, line 19 or integrates the purchased services into, a mobile line 20 telecommunications service or VoIP service.
line 21 (B)  “Reseller” does not include a serving carrier with which a line 22 home service provider arranges for the services to its customers line 23 outside the home service provider’s licensed service area. line 24 (8)  “Serving carrier” means a facilities-based carrier providing line 25 mobile telecommunications service to a customer outside a home line 26 service provider’s or reseller’s licensed area. line 27 (9)  “Taxing jurisdiction” means any of the several states, the line 28 District of Columbia, or any territory or possession of the United line 29 States, any municipality, city, county, township, parish, line 30 transportation district, or assessment jurisdiction, or any other line 31 political subdivision within the territorial limits of the United States line 32 with the authority to impose a tax, charge, or fee. line 33 (10)  “VoIP service provider” means that provider of VoIP line 34 service with whom the end user customer contracts for the line 35 provision of VoIP services for the customer’s own use and not for line 36 resale.
line 37 SEC. 9. Section 41021 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 38 amended to read:
line 39 41021. (a)  A service supplier shall collect the surcharges from line 40 each service user at the time it collects its billings from the service 94 — 15 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 user. The duty to collect the surcharge from a service user shall line 2 commence with the beginning of the first regular billing period line 3 applicable to that person which starts on or after the operative date line 4 of the surcharge imposed by this part. If the stations or lines of line 5 more than one service supplier are utilized in furnishing the line 6 telephone communication services to the service user, the service line 7 supplier that bills the customer shall collect the surcharge from line 8 the customer.
line 9 (b)  Only one payment per month under this part shall be required line 10 with respect to the surcharges on an access line. line 11 SEC. 10. Section 41022 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 12 amended to read:
line 13 41022. (a)  The surcharges required to be collected by the line 14 service supplier shall be added to and stated separately in its line 15 billings to the service user.
line 16 (b)  Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a service supplier may line 17 elect to combine the 911 and 988 surcharges into a single-line item line 18 on the service user billing. If the service supplier elects to combine line 19 the surcharges, the combined surcharge shall be labeled as the line 20 “911/988 Surcharge” on the service user’s bill. The service supplier line 21 shall remit the combined surcharges to the department in separate line 22 amounts for each surcharge on forms prescribed by the department. line 23 SEC. 11. Section 41023 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 24 amended to read:
line 25 41023. The surcharges required to be collected by the service line 26 supplier, and any amount unreturned to the service user that is not line 27 a surcharge but was collected from the service user as representing line 28 a surcharge, constitute debts owed by the service supplier to this line 29 state.
line 30 A service supplier that has collected any amount of surcharges line 31 in excess of the amount of surcharges imposed by this part and line 32 actually due from a service user, may refund that amount to the line 33 service user, even though that surcharge amount has already been line 34 paid over to the department and a corresponding credit or refund line 35 has not yet been secured. The service supplier may claim credit line 36 for that overpayment refund against the amount of surcharges line 37 imposed by this part that is due upon any other return, providing line 38 that credit is claimed in a return dated no later than three years line 39 from the date of overpayment.
94 AB 988 — 16 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 SEC. 12. Section 41024 of the Re
venue and Taxation Code is
line 2 amended to read:
line 3 41024. Every service user in this state is liable for the line 4 surcharges until it has been paid to this state, except that payment line 5 to a service supplier registered under this part is sufficient to relieve line 6 the user from further liability for the surcharge. line 7 Any surcharge collected from a service user that has not been line 8 remitted to the department shall be deemed a debt owed to the line 9 state by the person required to collect and remit that surcharge. line 10 Nothing in this part shall impose any obligation upon a service line 11 supplier to take any legal action to enforce the collection of the line 12 utility users surcharge imposed by this part. The service supplier line 13 shall provide the department with amounts uncollected which total line 14 three dollars ($3) or more on a cumulative basis with respect to a line 15 single service user along with the names, addresses, and reasons line 16 of the service users refusing to pay the surcharges imposed by this line 17 part.
line 18 SEC. 13. Section 41028 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 19 amended to read:
line 20 41028. (a)  (1)  On and after January 1, 2020, the surcharge line 21 amounts imposed by Section 41020 on the purchase of prepaid line 22 mobile telephony services in this state shall be collected by a seller line 23 from each prepaid consumer at the time of each retail transaction line 24 in this state. The surcharges shall be imposed at an amount as line 25 determined under Article 2 (commencing with Section 41030) on line 26 each retail transaction that occurs in this state. line 27 (2)  (A)  The amount of the surcharges shall be separately stated line 28 on an invoice, receipt, or other similar document that is provided line 29 to the prepaid consumer of mobile telephony services by the seller, line 30 or otherwise disclosed electronically to the prepaid consumer, at line 31 the time of the retail transaction.
line 32 (B)  Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), a seller may elect to line 33 combine the 911 and 988 surcharges into a single-line item. If the line 34 seller elects to combine the surcharges, the combined surcharge line 35 shall be labeled as the “911/988 Surcharge” on the invoice, receipt, line 36 or other similar document that is provided to the prepaid consumer line 37 of mobile telephony services by the seller, or otherwise disclosed line 38 electronically to the prepaid consumer, at the time of the retail line 39 transaction. The seller shall remit the combined surcharges to the 94 — 17 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 department in separate amounts for each surcharge on forms line 2 prescribed by the department.
line 3 (b)  (1)  The surcharges that are required to be collected by a line 4 seller and any amount unreturned to the prepaid consumer of line 5 mobile telephony services that is not owed as part of the surcharge, line 6 but was collected from the prepaid consumer under the line 7 representation by the seller that it was owed as part of the line 8 surcharge, constitutes debts owed by the seller to this state. line 9 (2)  A seller that has collected any amount of surcharge in excess line 10 of the amount of the surcharge imposed by this part and actually line 11 due from a prepaid consumer may refund that amount to the line 12 prepaid consumer, even though the surcharge amount has already line 13 been paid over to the department and a corresponding credit or line 14 refund has not yet been secured. The seller may claim credit for line 15 that overpayment refund against the amount of surcharge imposed line 16 by this part that is due upon any other return, providing that credit line 17 is claimed in a return dated no later than three years from the date line 18 of overpayment.
line 19 (c)  (1)  Every prepaid consumer of prepaid mobile telephony line 20 services in this state is liable for the surcharges until it has been line 21 paid to this state, except that payment to a seller registered under line 22 this part relieves the prepaid consumer from further liability for line 23 the surcharges. Any surcharge collected from a prepaid consumer line 24 that has not been remitted to the department shall be a debt owed line 25 to the state by the person required to collect and remit the line 26 surcharge. Nothing in this part shall impose any obligation upon line 27 a seller to take any legal action to enforce the collection of the line 28 surcharge imposed by this section.
line 29 (2)  A credit shall be allowed against, but shall not exceed, the line 30 surcharge amounts imposed on any prepaid consumer of mobile line 31 telephony services by this part to the extent that the prepaid line 32 consumer has paid emergency telephone users charges on the line 33 purchase to any other state, political subdivision thereof, or the line 34 District of Columbia. The credit shall be apportioned to the charges line 35 against which it is allowed in proportion to the amounts of those line 36 charges.
line 37 (d)  A seller is relieved from liability to collect the surcharge line 38 imposed by this part that became due and payable, insofar as the line 39 base upon which the surcharge is imposed is represented by line 40 accounts that have been found to be worthless and charged off for 94 AB 988 — 18 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 income tax purposes by the seller or, if the seller is not required line 2 to file income tax returns, charged off in accordance with generally line 3 accepted accounting principles. A seller that has previously paid line 4 the surcharge may, under rules and regulations prescribed by the line 5 department take as a deduction on its return the amount found line 6 worthless and charged off by the seller. If any such accounts are line 7 thereafter in whole or in part collected by the seller, the amount line 8 so collected shall be included in the first return filed after such line 9 collection and the surcharge shall be paid with the return. line 10 (e)  For purposes of this section, a retail transaction occurs in line 11 the state under any of the following circumstances:
line 12 (1)  The prepaid consumer makes the retail transaction in person line 13 at a business location in the state (point-of-sale transaction). line 14 (2)  If paragraph (1) is not applicable, the prepaid consumer’s line 15 address is in the state (known-address transaction). A line 16 known-address transaction occurs in the state under any of the line 17 following circumstances:
line 18 (A)  The retail sale involves shipping of an item to be delivered line 19 to, or picked up by, the prepaid consumer at a location in the state. line 20 (B)  If the prepaid consumer’s address is known by the seller to line 21 be in the state, including if the seller’s records maintained in the line 22 ordinary course of business indicate that the prepaid consumer’s line 23 address is in the state and the records are not made or kept in bad line 24 faith.
line 25 (C)  The prepaid consumer provides an address during line 26 consummation of the retail transaction that is in the state, including line 27 an address provided with respect to the payment instrument if no line 28 other address is available and the address is not given in bad faith. line 29 (3)  If an address is not available to the seller to determine line 30 whether any of the circumstances in paragraph (2) exist, the line 31 transaction will be deemed to be a known-address transaction line 32 occurring in this state if the mobile telephone number is associated line 33 with a location in this state.
line 34 (f)  The surcharge amounts imposed under this section shall be line 35 remitted by every seller, except a service supplier, as prescribed line 36 under Part 1 (commencing with Section 6001), along with a return line 37 filed using electronic media. The department shall administer such line 38 remittance and returns as prescribed under Part 1 (commencing line 39 with Section 6001).
94 — 19 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 (g)  Notwithstanding Article 1.1 (commencing with Section line 2 41060) of Chapter 4, any seller, except a service supplier, required, line 3 or that elects, to remit amounts due under Part 1 (commencing line 4 with Section 6001) by electronic funds transfer pursuant to Article line 5 1.2 (commencing with Section 6479.3) of Chapter 5 of Part 1 shall line 6 remit the surcharge upon prepaid mobile telephony service amounts line 7 due under this section by electronic funds transfer. line 8 (h)  The purchase in a retail transaction in this state of prepaid line 9 mobile telephony services, either alone or in combination with line 10 mobile data or other services, by a prepaid consumer is exempt line 11 from the surcharges if all of the following apply:
line 12 (1)  The prepaid consumer is certified as eligible for the state line 13 lifeline program or federal lifeline program.
line 14 (2)  The seller is authorized to provide lifeline service under the line 15 state lifeline program or federal lifeline program. line 16 SEC. 14. The heading of Article 2 (commencing with Section line 17 41030) of Chapter 2 of Part 20 of Division 2 of the Revenue and line 18 Taxation Code is amended to read:
line 19
line 20 Article 2. Adjustment of Surcharge Amounts
line 21
line 22 SEC. 15. Section 41030 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 23 amended to read:
line 24 41030. (a)  The Office of Emergency Services shall determine line 25 annually, on or before October 1, to be effective on January 1 of line 26 the following year, a surcharge amount pursuant to subdivision line 27 (b) that it estimates will produce sufficient revenue to fund the line 28 current fiscal year’s 911 and 988 costs.
line 29 (b)  For determinations made that are applicable to the calendar line 30 year beginning on January 1, 2020, and each calendar year line 31 thereafter, the surcharge amount shall be determined annually by line 32 dividing the costs, including incremental costs, the Office of line 33 Emergency Services estimates for the current fiscal year of the line 34 following:
line 35 (1)  The 911 costs approved pursuant to Article 6 (commencing line 36 with Section 53100) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title line 37 5 of the Government Code, less the available balance in the State line 38 Emergency Telephone Number Account in the General Fund, by line 39 its estimate of the number of access lines to which the surcharge line 40 will apply per month for the period of January 1 to December 31, 94 AB 988 — 20 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 inclusi
ve, of the next succeeding calendar year, but in no event line 2 shall the surcharge amount in any month be greater than eighty line 3 cents ($0.80) per access line per month.
line 4 (2)  For the 2023 and 2024 calendar years, the 988 surcharge line 5 shall be set at eight cents ($0.08) per access line per month. line 6 (3)  For the year beginning January 1, 2025, and each calendar line 7 year thereafter, the 988 surcharge shall be determined by dividing line 8 the 988 costs approved pursuant to Article 6.3 (commencing with line 9 Section 53123.1) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of line 10 the Government Code, less the available balance in the 988 State line 11 Mental Health and Crisis Services Special Fund, by the Office of line 12 Emergency Services’ estimate of the number of access lines to line 13 which the surcharge will apply per month for the period of January line 14 1 to December 31, inclusive, of the next succeeding calendar year, line 15 but in no event shall the surcharge amount in any month be greater line 16 than thirty cents ($0.30) per access line per month. line 17 (c)  When determining the surcharge amount pursuant to this line 18 section, the office shall include the costs it expects to incur to plan, line 19 test, implement, and operate Next Generation 911 technology and line 20 services, including text to 911 service, and alerts and warnings, line 21 consistent with the plan and timeline required by Section 53121 line 22 of the Government Code.
line 23 (d)  (1)  Service suppliers shall report the total number of access line 24 lines to the Office of Emergency Services, on or before August 1, line 25 for the previous period of January 1 to December 31, inclusive. line 26 (2)  The total number of access lines required to be reported in line 27 paragraph (1) shall include all lines from the categories of wireline line 28 communication service line, wireless communication service line, line 29 prepaid mobile telephony service line, and VoIP service line. The line 30 number of access line figures shall be reported individually for line 31 these categories.
line 32 (3)  Notwithstanding any other law, the Office of Emergency line 33 Services, within 45 days of receiving a request from the line 34 department, shall provide the department the name and address of line 35 each service supplier, each service supplier’s total number of access line 36 lines, as provided in paragraph (2) for the prior calendar year, and line 37 any other information the department deems necessary to conduct line 38 its responsibilities under this part.
line 39 (e)  The office shall perform a validation of the number of access line 40 lines using subscription data or other comparable data collected 94 — 21 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 by appropriate federal or state agencies. This subscription data or line 2 other comparable data shall be used to validate the access line data line 3 required to be reported by service suppliers in subdivision (d). line 4 (f)  (1)  The office shall notify the department of the surcharge line 5 amount imposed under this part, determined pursuant to this section line 6 on or before October 1 of each year.
line 7 (2)  The surcharge imposed on the purchase of prepaid mobile line 8 telephony services shall be equal to the amount set forth in line 9 subdivision (b) for each retail transaction in this state. line 10 (g)  (1)  At least 30 days prior to determining the surcharge line 11 pursuant to subdivision (a), the Office of Emergency Services shall line 12 prepare a summary of the calculation of the proposed surcharge line 13 and make it available to the public, the Legislature, the 911 line 14 Advisory Board, the Mental Health Services Oversight and line 15 Accountability Commission, the State Department of Public Health, line 16 and on its internet website.
line 17 (2)  For determinations made on or before October 1, 2019, the line 18 summary shall contain all of the following:
line 19 (A)  The prior year revenues to fund 911 costs, including, but line 20 not limited to, revenues from prepaid service.
line 21 (B)  Projected expenses and revenues from all sources, including, line 22 but not limited to, prepaid service to fund 911 costs. line 23 (C)  The rationale for adjustment to the surcharge determined line 24 pursuant to subdivision (b), including, but not limited to, all line 25 impacts from the surcharge collected pursuant to Part 21 line 26 (commencing with Section 42001).
line 27 (h)  For purposes of this section, for the determination made by line 28 the office on or before October 1, 2019, that is applicable for the line 29 calendar year beginning on January 1, 2020, and ending on line 30 December 31, 2020, the following definitions shall apply:
line 31 (1)  “Service supplier” shall mean a person supplying an access line 32 line to a service user in this state.
line 33 (2)  “Service user” means any person that subscribes for the right line 34 to utilize an access line in this state who is required to pay a line 35 surcharge under the provisions of this part.
line 36 SEC. 16. Section 41031 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 37 amended to read:
line 38 41031. The Office of Emergency Services shall make its line 39 determination of the surcharge amounts each year no later than line 40 October 1 and shall notify the department of the new amounts 94 AB 988 — 22 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 which shall be effecti
ve with respect to access lines and the
line 2 purchase of prepaid mobile telephony services on or after January line 3 1 of the next succeeding calendar year.
line 4 SEC. 17. Section 41032 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 5 amended to read:
line 6 41032. Immediately upon notification by the Office of line 7 Emergency Services, the department shall notify every service line 8 supplier and seller registered with it of the new amounts by a means line 9 determined by the department that may include, but is not limited line 10 to, mail, electronic mail, or internet website postings. line 11 SEC. 18. Section 41046 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 12 amended to read:
line 13 41046. (a)  There are exempt from the surcharges the following line 14 access lines and nonaccess line services:
line 15 (1)  Those lines supplying lifeline service.
line 16 (2)  Those lines connected to public telephones. line 17 (3)  Those lines for which no charges are billed by a service line 18 supplier to a service user.
line 19 (b)  This section shall become operative on January 1, 2020. line 20 SEC. 19. Section 41050 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 21 amended to read:
line 22 41050. (a)  The surcharges imposed by subparagraph (A) of line 23 paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 41020 are imposed to line 24 each access line for which a service user has subscribed in any line 25 calendar month, whether or not the subscription covered all or part line 26 of any month.
line 27 (b)  If a service user subscribes for service with one service line 28 supplier for a portion of a month and then subscribes for service line 29 with another service supplier for the remainder of the same month, line 30 the service user is liable for the surcharge to each of the access line 31 lines for which the service user has subscribed with the service line 32 supplier.
line 33 SEC. 20. Section 41098 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 34 amended to read:
line 35 41098. (a)  If the department finds that a person’s failure to line 36 make a timely return or payment is due to the person’s reasonable line 37 reliance on written advice from the department, the person may line 38 be relieved of the surcharges imposed by this part and any penalty line 39 or interest added thereto.
94 — 23 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 (b)
For purposes of this section, a person’s failure to make a line 2 timely return or payment shall be considered to be due to line 3 reasonable reliance on written advice from the department, only line 4 if the department finds that all of the following conditions are line 5 satisfied:
line 6 (1)  The person requested in writing that the department advise line 7 the person whether a particular activity or transaction is subject to line 8 the surcharge under this part. The specific facts and circumstances line 9 of the activity or transaction shall be fully described in the request. line 10 (2)  The department responded in writing to the person regarding line 11 the written request for advice, stating whether or not the described line 12 activity or transaction is subject to the surcharges, or stating the line 13 conditions under which the activity or transaction is subject to the line 14 surcharges.
line 15 (3)  The liability for surcharges applied to a particular activity line 16 or transaction which occurred before either of the following:
line 17 (A)  Before the department rescinded or modified the advice so line 18 given, by sending written notice to the person of rescinded or line 19 modified advice.
line 20 (B)  Before a change in statutory or constitutional law, a change line 21 in the department’s regulations, or a final decision of a court, which line 22 renders the department’s earlier written advice no longer valid. line 23 (c)  Any person seeking relief under this section shall file with line 24 the department all of the following:
line 25 (1)  A copy of the person’s written request to the department line 26 and a copy of the department’s written advice.
line 27 (2)  A statement under penalty of perjury setting forth the facts line 28 on which the claim for relief is based.
line 29 (3)  Any other information which the department may require. line 30 (d)  Only the person making the written request shall be entitled line 31 to rely on the department’s written advice to that person. line 32 SEC. 21. Section 41100 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 33 amended to read:
line 34 41100. If the department determines that any amount, penalty, line 35 or interest has been paid more than once or has been erroneously line 36 or illegally collected or computed, the department shall set forth line 37 that fact in the records of the department, certify the amount line 38 collected in excess of the amount legally due and the person from line 39 whom it was collected or by whom paid, and credit the excess line 40 amount collected or paid on any amounts then due and payable 94 AB 988 — 24 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 from the person from whom the excess amount was collected or line 2 by whom it was paid under this part, and the balance shall be line 3 refunded to the person, or their successors, administrators, or line 4 executors. Any proposed determination by the department pursuant line 5 to this section with respect to an amount in excess of fifty thousand line 6 dollars ($50,000) shall be available as a public record for at least line 7 10 days prior to the effective date of that determination. line 8 Any overpayment of a surcharge by a service user to a service line 9 supplier or by a prepaid consumer to a seller who is required to line 10 collect the surcharge shall be credited or refunded by the state to line 11 the service user. However, if the service supplier or seller has paid line 12 the amount to the department and establishes to the satisfaction of line 13 the department that it has not collected the amount from the service line 14 user or has refunded the amount to the service user, the line 15 overpayment may be credited or refunded by the state to the service line 16 supplier.
line 17 SEC. 22. Section 41128 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 18 amended to read:
line 19 41128. The department shall enforce the provisions of this part line 20 and may prescribe, adopt, and enforce rules and regulations relating line 21 to the administration and enforcement of this part. The department line 22 shall not prescribe, adopt, or enforce any rule or regulation that line 23 has the effect, directly or indirectly, of altering the terms and line 24 conditions of service of a service supplier serving the general line 25 public, other than the imposition of the surcharges. line 26 SEC. 23. Section 41135 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 27 amended to read:
line 28 41135. (a)  All amounts required to be paid to the state under line 29 this part shall be paid to the department in the form of remittances line 30 payable to the California Department of Tax and Fee line 31 Administration. The department shall transmit the payments to the line 32 State Treasurer to be deposited in the State Treasury to either the line 33 credit of the State Emergency Telephone Number Account in the line 34 General Fund, or the 988 State Mental Health and Crisis Services line 35 Special Fund, depending on the apportionment of the surcharge line 36 arising from the 911 emergency communication system or the 988 line 37 crisis hotline.
line 38 (b)  The department, in consultation with the Office of line 39 Emergency Services, may adopt regulations to implement the line 40 apportionment of the surcharge.
94 — 25 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 (c)  The department shall submit an annual report to the Office line 2 of Emergency Services on revenue generated by the 988 surcharge. line 3 SEC. 24. Section 41136 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 4 amended to read:
line 5 41136. (a)  From the funds in the State Emergency Telephone line 6 Number Account, all amounts of the surcharge collected shall, line 7 when appropriated by the Legislature, be spent solely for the line 8 following purposes:
line 9 (1)  To pay refunds authorized by this part.
line 10 (2)  To pay the department for the cost of the administration of line 11 this part.
line 12 (3)  To pay the Office of Emergency Services for its costs in line 13 administration of the “911” emergency telephone number system. line 14 (4)  To pay bills submitted to the Office of Emergency Services line 15 by service suppliers or communications equipment companies for line 16 the installation of, and ongoing expenses for, the following line 17 communications services supplied to local agencies in connection line 18 with the “911” emergency phone number system:
line 19 (A)  A basic system, defined as 911 systems, including, but not line 20 limited to, Next Generation 911, and the subsequent technologies, line 21 and interfaces needed to deliver 911 voice and data information line 22 from the 911 caller to the emergency responder and the subsequent line 23 technologies, and interfaces needed to send information, including, line 24 but not limited to, alerts and warnings, to potential 911 callers. line 25 (B)  A basic system with telephone central office identification. line 26 (C)  A system employing automatic call routing. line 27 (D)  Approved incremental costs.
line 28 (5)  To pay claims of local agencies for approved incremental line 29 costs, not previously compensated for by another governmental line 30 agency.
line 31 (6)  To pay claims of local agencies for incremental costs and line 32 amounts, not previously compensated for by another governmental line 33 agency, incurred prior to the effective date of this part, for the line 34 installation and ongoing expenses for the following communication line 35 services supplied in connection with the “911” emergency line 36 telephone number system:
line 37 (A)  A basic system, defined as 911 systems, including, but not line 38 limited to, Next Generation 911, and the subsequent technologies, line 39 and interfaces needed to deliver 911 voice and data information line 40 from the 911 caller to the emergency responder and the subsequent 94 AB 988 — 26 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 technologies, and interfaces needed to send information, including, line 2 but not limited to, alerts and warnings, to potential 911 callers. line 3 (B)  A basic system with telephone central office identification. line 4 (C)  A system employing automatic call routing.
line 5 (D)  Approved incremental costs. Incremental costs shall not be line 6 allowed unless the costs are concurred in by the Office of line 7 Emergency Services.
line 8 (b)  (1)  From the funds in the 988 State Mental Health and Crisis line 9 Services Special Fund, all amounts of the 988 surcharge collected line 10 shall be spent for purposes identified in Section 53123.4 of the line 11 Government Code. However, before funds are disbursed as line 12 provided in Section 53123.4 of the Government Code, funds shall line 13 be used for all of the following:
line 14 (A)  To pay refunds authorized by this part.
line 15 (B)  To pay the department for the cost of the administration of line 16 this part.
line 17 (C)  To pay the Office of Emergency Services for its costs in line 18 administration of the 988 crisis hotline.
line 19 (2)  The remainder of the revenue shall be disbursed to the Office line 20 of Emergency Services for the purposes identified in Section line 21 53123.4 of the Government Code.
line 22 SEC. 25. Section 41150 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is line 23 amended to read:
line 24 41150. (a)  The Legislature hereby declares and finds that to line 25 enable public agencies to implement “911” emergency phone line 26 systems required by the provisions of Chapter 1005 of the 1972 line 27 Regular Session (Article 6 (commencing with Section 53100) of line 28 Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government line 29 Code) it is necessary that a surcharge be imposed upon each access line 30 line in the state and upon the purchase of prepaid mobile telephony line 31 services in this state for access to the 911 emergency line 32 communication system. This act will provide funding for basic line 33 911, as defined in Section 41136, and the technology and interfaces line 34 needed to deliver 911 voice and data information from the 911 line 35 caller to the emergency responder and the subsequent technologies, line 36 and interfaces needed to send information, including, but not line 37 limited to, alerts and warnings, to potential 911 callers. In addition, line 38 this part will provide funding for incremental costs. line 39 (b)  The Legislature hereby finds and declares that to enable line 40 public agencies to implement the 988 hotline required by the 94 — 27 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 provisions of the Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Pre vention Act
line 2 (Article 6.3 (commencing with Section 53123.1) of Chapter 1 of line 3 Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code) it is line 4 necessary that a surcharge be imposed upon access lines purchased line 5 by every person in the state for access to the 988 crisis hotline. line 6 This act, as amended by the act adding this subdivision, will line 7 provide funding, in part, for 988 centers operated by counties and line 8 mobile crisis teams and crisis receiving and stabilization services. line 9 teams.
line 10 SEC. 26. (a)  The sum of eight million thirty-five thousand line 11 seven hundred dollars ($8,035,700) is hereby appropriated from line 12 the General Fund to the 988 State Mental Health and Crisis line 13 Services Special Fund, as established in Section 2 of this act. line 14 (b)  The sum appropriated in subdivision (a) shall be used for line 15 the following purposes:
line 16 (1)  To cover the state’s first year of administrative costs in line 17 implementing Section 2 of this act.
line 18 (2)  To fund designated 988 centers to support the first year of line 19 their implementation of the 988 system.
line 20 SEC. 27. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to line 21 Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution for certain line 22 costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district line 23 because, in that regard, this act creates a new crime or infraction, line 24 eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime line 25 or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the line 26 Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the line 27 meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California line 28 Constitution.
line 29 However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that line 30 this act contains other costs mandated by the state, reimbursement line 31 to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made line 32 pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division line 33 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
line 34 SEC. 27. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant line 35 to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because line 36 the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school line 37 district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or line 38 infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty line 39 for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of line 40 the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within 94 AB 988 — 28 —

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) line 1 the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California line 2 Constitution.
line 3 SEC. 28. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the line 4 immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within line 5 the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall line 6 go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
line 7 In order to provide public safety resources as quickly as possible, line 8 it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.

O
94 — 29 — AB 988

7.13.b
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Text of AB 988 (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) Correspondence

7.13.c
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Correspondence (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) 1 Danielle Habr
From: Danielle Habr
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 1:56 PM
To: Michael Harris
Cc: June Catalano; Juanita Davalos; Geoff Gillette; Bryan Hill Subject: AB 988 Update and Request for Continued Support - Barbara Pennington Attachments: AB 988_Senate Policy Sample Support Letter.docx Mayor Harris,
We will add this item to the agenda for Monday’s meeting.

Thank you,
Danielle
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 10:41 AM
To: June Catalano <[email protected]>; Danielle Habr <[email protected]>; Juanita Davalos <[email protected]>; Geoff Gillette <[email protected]> Subject: Online Form Submittal: Email the City Council
If you are having problems viewing this HTML email, click to view a Text version.

Email the City Council
Please note that all emails submitted through this website will be shared with all Councilmembers and certain City staff members. These emails are considered public records under the California Public Records Act (Govt. Code Section 6250, et seq.)
Name:* Barbara Pennington
Street
Address:*
36 Sandra Ct
City* Walnut Creek
Phone
Number:

Email:* [email protected]
Subject:* AB 988 Update and Request for Continued Support Question
or
Comment:

Dear Mayor Harris, Vice Mayor Flaherty, and Councilmembers Carlson, Noack, and Rinn, I am contacting you again on behalf of the Miles Hall Foundation, whose mission is to support and protect families living with mental illness. We emailed each other in 2021 about Pleasant Hill's support for Assembly Bill 988: The Miles Hall Lifeline Act 988 Suicide and Mental Health Crisis Hotline. We are grateful for the letters you sent supporting AB 988. The 9-8-8 number for the National Suicide Prevention Hotline was officially launched nationwide on July 16, 2022. However AB 988, the California bill to provide funding to support around the clock non-police crisis intervention, has not yet passed. We ran into a delay last year because of the recall! We need you to assist us with crossing the finish line. The 9-8-8 number provides call and text services for people in crisis to connect with suicide prevention and mental health crisis counselors. It does NOT provide mobile mental health non-police crisis services. AB 988, the Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act, will significantly enhance the new 9-8-8 call number. With the passage of this legislation, callers will be connected with around-the-clock intervention, including mobile crisis

7.13.c
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Correspondence (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) 2 teams staffed by trained mental health professionals and trained peers instead of law enforcement.

The bill also funds interoperability between 9-8-8 and 9-1-1, allowing calls to be transferred between the two so that the most appropriate services can be provided for mental health emergencies. AB 988 is headed to Senate Appropriations when the legislature reconvenes on August 1st. It is essential that the Miles Hall Lifeline Act be passed so that all California moves toward access to a 24/7 non-police mobile response for those experiencing a mental health crisis. The Miles Hall Foundation has a fact sheet about the bill https://www.themileshallfoundation.org/ab-988 I've attached a sample letter for you to use if you wish. The portal to submit letters of support is https://calegislation.lc.ca.gov/Advocates/ It is important to the Foundation that the city of Pleasant Hill continues your support for AB 988. Please let me know if you need further information, and please let me know when you decide to continue your support! Thank you for considering this and thank you for your service to the citizens of Pleasant Hill and Contra Costa County.

Upload File
Attachment
here
AB 988_Senate Policy Sample Support Letter.docx

* indicates required fields.

View any uploaded files by signing in and then proceeding to the link below:
http://www.pleasanthillca.org/Admin/FormHistory.aspx?SID=16512 The following form was submitted via your website: Email the City Council Please note that all emails submitted through this website will be shared with all Councilmembers and certain City staff members. These emails are considered public records under the California Public Records Act (Govt.

Code Section 6250, et seq.):

Name:: Barbara Pennington
Street Address:: 36 Sandra Ct
City: Walnut Creek
Phone Number::

Email:: [email protected]
Subject:: AB 988 Update and Request for Continued Support Question or Comment:: Dear Mayor Harris, Vice Mayor Flaherty, and Councilmembers Carlson, Noack, and Rinn,
I am contacting you again on behalf of the Miles Hall Foundation, whose mission is to support and protect families living with mental illness. We emailed each other in 2021 about Pleasant Hill's support for Assembly Bill 988: The Miles Hall Lifeline Act 988 Suicide and Mental Health Crisis Hotline. We are grateful for the letters you sent supporting AB 988.

The 9-8-8 number for the National Suicide Prevention Hotline was officially launched nationwide on July 16, 2022. However AB 988, the California bill to provide funding to support around the clock non-police crisis intervention, has not yet passed. We ran into a delay last year because of the recall! We need you to assist us with crossing the finish line.

7.13.c
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Correspondence (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) 3 The 9-8-8 number provides call and text services for people in crisis to connect with suicide prevention and mental health crisis counselors. It does NOT provide mobile mental health non-police crisis services.

AB 988, the Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act, will significantly enhance the new 9-8-8 call number. With the passage of this legislation, callers will be connected with around-the-clock intervention, including mobile crisis teams staffed by trained mental health professionals and trained peers instead of law enforcement. The bill also funds interoperability between 9-8-8 and 9-1-1, allowing calls to be transferred between the two so that the most appropriate services can be provided for mental health emergencies.

AB 988 is headed to Senate Appropriations when the legislature reconvenes on August 1st. It is essential that the Miles Hall Lifeline Act be passed so that all California moves toward access to a 24/7 non-police mobile response for those experiencing a mental health crisis.

The Miles Hall Foundation has a fact sheet about the bill https://www.themileshallfoundation.org/ab-988 I've attached a sample letter for you to use if you wish.

The portal to submit letters of support is https://calegislation.lc.ca.gov/Advocates/ It is important to the Foundation that the city of Pleasant Hill continues your support for AB 988. Please let me know if you need further information, and please let me know when you decide to continue your support! Thank you for considering this and thank you for your service to the citizens of Pleasant Hill and Contra Costa County.

Upload File Attachment here: AB 988_Senate Policy Sample Support Letter.docx Additional Information:

Form submitted on: 7/28/2022 10:41:07 AM
Submitted from IP Address: 66.234.197.235
Referrer Page: https://www.pleasanthillca.org/582/Contact-City-Council-Staff Form Address: http://www.pleasanthillca.org/Forms.aspx?FID=137

7.13.c
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Correspondence (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) [Insert Organization Logo or Letterhead]
1 June [XX], 2022
The Honorable Anthony Portantino, Chair
Senate Appropriations Committee
California State Capitol, Room 412
Sacramento, CA 95814

RE: AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act – SUPPORT

Dear Chair Portantino:

[Insert Organization Name] strongly supports Assembly Bill 988 (Bauer-Kahan), known as the Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act, to implement the national 988 behavioral health emergency response system in California so that everyone experiencing a behavioral health crisis can access life-saving care.

In October of 2020, both chambers of Congress unanimously passed, and the President signed historic legislation, the National Suicide and Mental Health Crisis Hotline Designation Act, establishing a new phone line (988) for suicide prevention and immediate behavioral health crisis response nationwide.

States are tasked with creating the framework and funding the systems to receive and respond to calls and deliver appropriate crisis care for those experiencing a behavioral health or suicide crisis.

Here is the challenge: This month, the 988 phone number became available in California and across the country. We have the opportunity to create a sustainable system that ensures California leads the nation in crisis response. Initial federal and state investments prepared California for the launch of the number, but they aren’t enough to build the sustainable crisis response system that is needed in response to those phone calls. As the calls come in, Californians in crisis will find themselves at the mercy of a county-bycounty ad-hoc approach to crisis response. With a simple call to 988, all Californians should have someone to call, someone to come, and somewhere to go. AB 988 addresses this challenge, by ensuring:

Sustained funding for crisis centers and mobile response: Ongoing costs to sustain the 988-crisis response system are significant. To create an effective crisis response system that every Californian has universal and reliable access to, it must have a permanent and sustainable funding source. AB 988 introduces a small telephone surcharge, as permitted in federal 988 legislation, set at only $0.08 per line per month for the first two years with a lifetime cap of $0.30 per line per month to fund the California crisis centers and mobile crisis teams. Current 988 funding does not include sustained funding for these critical elements of transformational crisis response.

Coordinated implementation and long-term planning: Currently inconsistency is the only consistency when it comes to crisis response in California. Right now, a person in crisis in Los Angeles County is guaranteed a vastly different response from someone in Modoc County. Comprehensive system reform is required to ensure first responders, behavioral health agencies, call centers and healthcare providers are all providing consistent and compassionate crisis response across the state. Investments in 988 coming from various federal and state sources will further complicate efforts to coordinate crisis response. AB 988 tasks the Office of Emergency Services (OES) with creating a technical advisory board at OES to inform the integration of 988 and 911. AB 988 also tasks HHS with developing a 5-year implementation plan for 988. While the Health and Human Services Agency will be undertaking a planning process for broader crisis intervention, a distinct technical planning process for 988 is imperative. [Insert a few sentences about your organization and why this bill is important to you].

AB 988 enjoys bi-partisan co-authorship from nearly one-third of the Legislature. The bill is also supported by a wide range of consumer advocates, health care providers, and others including the National Union of Health Care Workers, the National Association of Social Workers, NAMI of California, Mental Health America of California, American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, California

7.13.c
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Correspondence (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act) 2 Psychological Association, and the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network as well as more than 2,500 individuals.

California has an extraordinary opportunity to transform our behavioral health crisis response system and save countless lives by expanding access to vital behavioral health resources all through one easy-toremember three-digit number.

For these reasons, we strongly support AB 988 and respectfully request your support. Should you have any questions, you can contact us at [insert contact information].

Sincerely,
[Signature]
[Name]
[Title]

7.13.c
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Correspondence (Letter Supporting AB 988 (Bauer-Kahan) The Miles Hall Lifeline and Suicide Prevention Act)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___ - 22 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO

THE AUTHORIZED AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) FUNDS

PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS

SYNOPSIS
The City of Pleasant Hill received an allocation of $8.3 million through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). The Budget Committee recommended approval of additional uses of the ARPA funds which was mainly incorporated in the adoption of the City’s Biennial Budget and the 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan. This report provides a summary of ARPA approvals to date and requests budget modifications to accommodate recent Council decisions.

DISCUSSION
Backround
On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was passed by Congress, allocating $1.9 trillion to assist with alleviating the impacts of COVID-19. The ARPA included a State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund which provides $130 billion for local governments to enable them to continue to support their public health responses and assist with economic recovery. The City of Pleasant Hill received an ARPA allocation of $8.3 million, which is received in two tranches. The City received the first tranche last July for $4.17 million and the second tranche was recently received. Eligible costs must be expended between March 3, 2021 and December 31, 2026, and obligated by December 31, 2024.

On January 6, 2022, the U.S. Treasury issued the Final Rule containing the major provisions for use and reporting of Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (aka ARPA funds). The Final Rule increased the flexibility for local governments while simplifying the program. The Final Rule took effect on April 1, 2022 but allows flexibility to use the Final Rule since the beginning of the eligibility date. A summary of the major provisions follow:
• Replacing Lost Revenue - The Final Rule offers a one-time standard allowance election for revenue loss of up to $10 million, enabling the City to select to use the full allocation for government services (defined as services traditionally provided by the recipient government agency) with streamlined reporting requirements.

7.14 Packet Pg. 263
• Public Health and Economic Impacts - The Final Rule clarifies that recipients can use funds for capital expenditures that support an eligible COVID-19 public health or economic response. The set of households and communities that are presumed to be impacted by the pandemic as well as the set of uses, including broader ability to restore and support government employment, was also expanded.
• Premium Pay - The Final Rule delivers more streamlined options to provide premium pay by broadening the share of eligible workers who can receive premium pay without a written justification.
• Water, Sewer & Broadband Infrastructure - The Final Rule significantly broadens eligible broadband infrastructure investments and adds additional eligible water and sewer infrastructure investments.

7.14 Packet Pg. 264
ARPA Past Activities
The City submitted the required documentation to the State of California last summer to receive the initial first tranche of ARPA funds. The funds were deposited into a new fund in the financial system to easily track revenues and expenditures. Staff has held several public meetings with the Budget Committee and provided updates to City Council as part of the Biennial Budget and Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. City Council has authorized staff to proceed with the following:

DESCRIPTION TOTAL
ARPA ALLOCATION TO PLEASANT HILL $ 8,334,229
(RECEIVED $4.12 MILLION IN JULY 2021, SECOND HALF RECEIVED IN JULY 2022)

MAJOR USES
PUBLIC SECTOR REVENUE LOSS CATEGORY (Elected up to $10 million Standard Allowance):

Sub Category Use:

WATER, SEWER & BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE:

Gregory Gardens Storm Drain (Approved by City Council) $ (1,500,000) Diablo View Storm Drain Improvement Project (Approved by City Council) $ (620,000) PUBLIC HEALTH & ECONOMIC RESPONSE:

Business Grants & Assistance (Approved by City Council) $ (500,000) Audio Visual & Broadcast System in Council Chambers (Approved by City Council) $ (145,951) Chamber of Commerce (Approved by City Council) $ (60,000) Safety - Cleaning & Supplies (Approved by City Council) $ (250,000) Digital Documentation Accessibility (Recommended by Budget Comm.) $ (350,000) PD Underground Storage Tank (Approved by City Council) $ (1,200,000) Crossing Guard Services (Contract Approved by City Council) $ (144,780) Retention of Essential Employees (MOU Approved by City Council) $ (245,000) Library Service (Approved by City Council) $ (322,638)
Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project (Approved by City Council) $ (100,000) City Hall Pond Plumbing System Repairs (Approved by City Council) $ (395,000) City Hall Fountain Renovation Project (Approved by City Council) $ (475,000) TOTAL USES $ (6,308,369)
REMAINING ARPA FUNDING $ 2,025,860
ARPA Analysis
This report is intended to provide the City Council an update on the City’s ARPA allocation to date and request approval of the following items:

1. On July 11, 2022, City Council approved a contract for crossing guard services which included an allocation of ARPA funds in the amount of $144,780. Staff is seeking approval to amend the budget and transfer this sum from the ARPA fund to reimburse for these costs.

2. Also on July 11, 2022, City Council approved a Memorandum of Understanding with Pleasant Hill Police Association which included an allocation of ARPA funds in the amount of $245,000. Staff is seeking approval to amend the budget and transfer this sum from the ARPA fund to reimburse for these costs.

7.14 Packet Pg. 265

FISCAL IMPACT

1. Appropriate and transfer up to $144,780 of ARPA fund to reimburse the City for crossing guard services to the Traffic Safety Fund.

2. Appropriate and transfer up to $245,000 of ARPA funds to reimburse the City for safety expenditures to the General Fund.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt the proposed resolution as recommended by staff.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Council could choose not to adopt the proposed resolution and these costs would need to be funded by the General Fund.

Prepared by: Erick Cheung, Finance Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

7.14 Packet Pg. 266
RESOLUTION NO. -22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 TO APPROPRIATE $389,780 IN ARPA FUNDS FOR SAFETY RELATED EXPENSES AND

SELECT THE REVENUE LOSS STANDARD ALLOWANCE ALLOWED BY ARPA WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Biennial Budget Fiscal Years 22/23-23/24 budget on June 27, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill received an allocation for $8,334,229 in American Rescue Plan Act 2021 (ARPA) funds; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill received the first half of the allocation for $4,167,115 and deposited it into a new fund (ARPA Fund) in the financial system for tracking of revenues and expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved allocations of ARPA funds for infrastructure, public health and economic responses; and
WHEREAS, on January 6, 2022 the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the Final rule containing the major provisions for the use and reporting of the Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: and for small business grants and other programs that benefit small businesses; and
WHEREAS, the Final Rule offers a standard allowance for revenue loss of up to $10 million, enabling the City to select to use the full award for government services with streamlined reporting requirements; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that a $144,780 budget adjustment for FY 22/23 is hereby adopted for crossing guard services and transfer from the ARPA Fund to the Traffic Safety Fund for actual costs incurred; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council herby authorizes that a $245,000 budget adjustment for FY 22/23 is hereby adopted for safety expenditures and transfer from the ARPA Fund to the General Fund for actual costs incurred.

7.14.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (ARPA Project and Program Amendments) ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 1
st of August, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk

7.14.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (ARPA Project and Program Amendments)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 01, 2022
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-22,

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT & ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW PERMIT AMENDMENT (PLN 18-0198) FOR THE CAMBRIA
HOTEL PROJECT INCLUDING SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT 3131 AND
3195 NORTH MAIN STREET AND 1531 OAK PARK BOULEVARD
(ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 170-092-050, 054, 055, 057, 058, 059)

SYNOPSIS
This is a public hearing to consider a modification to previously approved Development Plan and Architectural Review Permit conditions of approval for the Cambria Hotel Project and related site improvements. The approved project included a General Plan Amendment, Planned Unit Development (Rezoning) Concept Plan, Development Plan Permit, Architectural Review Permit, including adjustments to development standards and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. The project is a three- and four-story, 155-room hotel (approximate 49-foot-tall building with architectural features up to 59 feet tall) with associated parking, landscaping, and amenities on an approximately 2.5-acre at 3131 and 3195 North Main Street and 1531 Oak Park Boulevard (Assessor Parcel Numbers 170-092-050, -054, -055, -057, -058, and -059). The applicant’s request does not include any changes to these aspects of the project. The applicant is seeking amendment to the approved public benefit package and changes to the conditions of approval related to the public benefit in the form of undergrounding improvements, as described in the staff report.

DISCUSSION
Background
The applicant originally submitted an application for the hotel in 2018. The City approved the project in September 2019 after multiple hearings with the Architectural Review and Planning Commissions and the City Council. The project included a public benefit proposal that incorporated off-site undergrounding of utilities. The ARC determined, from a design perspective, that one remaining pole on site would be appropriate, while the PC supported project undergrounding of utilities, but was open to subsequent analysis to determine feasibility of undergrounding to the south or north of the Oak Park Boulevard overpass. The City Council, further discussed the off-site undergrounding of utilities and concluded that the off-site utility

8.1 Packet Pg. 269
undergrounding to the north of the Oak Park Boulevard overpass is appropriate and included this requirement as part of the project’s public benefit package.

The applicant then made a building permit submittal to the City just prior to the start of the global COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic slowed the pace of the project, which required a time extension from the City (granted in August 2021). The applicant began discussions with PG&E during the pause, and completed additional analysis to determine the full extent of the required off-site improvements north of the project site. The applicant subsequently submitted a request to amend the terms of the public benefit agreement including payment of a fee in lieu of undergrounding the utilities north of the project site and an amendment to artwork provisions.

Project Description
The applicant is requesting the City amend the public benefit portion of the conditions of approval for the hotel project that included a General Plan Amendment, Planned Unit Development (Rezoning) Concept Plan, Development Plan Permit, Architectural Review Permit, including adjustments to development standards and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. The approved project is a three- and four-story 155-room hotel (approximate 49 foot tall building with architectural features up to 59 feet tall) with associated parking, landscaping, and amenities on an approximately 2.5-acre site.

The applicant proposed the following financial contributions as a public benefit in the original proposal, as summarized below:
 Onsite Artwork - $75,000 (maximum expenditure)
 Library (Bridge) Contribution - $50,000
 Affordable Housing Fund Contribution - $50,000
The project included additional project public benefits required by City Council as noted below:
 Off-site undergrounding of utilities north of the project site  Installation of a conforming sidewalk, curb and gutter, street lights and joint trenching west to Pleasant Valley Drive
The applicant is proposing modifications as summarized below:

Approved Architectural Condition of Approval 1.2a.
“Prior to building permit issuance, detailed plans for public art shall be submitted to the Architectural Review Commission for review and input prior to final approval by the Zoning Administrator, up to a limit of $75,000. The public art shall be completed/installed prior to building permit occupancy.”
The applicant proposes to modify the condition to read:

8.1 Packet Pg. 270
“Prior to building permit issuance, detailed plans for public art shall be submitted to the Architectural Review Commission for review and input prior to final approval by the Zoning Administrator, with a minimum expenditure of $25,000. The public art* shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.”
* The public art is to be installed on the project site.

Approved Engineering Condition of Approval A.vii (Off-Site Improvements) – Portion of the Public Benefit.
“Applicant shall underground all overhead PG&E power lines along the project frontage along North Main Street. This includes the pole at the northeast corner of the property. The undergrounding to the north shall extend north of the Oak Park Boulevard overpass.” The applicant proposes to modify the condition to read:
“Applicant shall underground all overhead PG&E power lines along the project frontage along North Main Street, except for the pole at the northeast corner of the property.” The applicant proposes the following changes to the public benefit as part of this request:
 Onsite Artwork - $25,000 (minimum expenditure)
 Bridge (at Library) Contribution - $25,000
 Affordable Housing Fund Contribution - $25,000
 Off-site Utility Underground In-Lieu Payment - $425,000 The revised public benefit would remove the requirement to underground off-site utilities north of the site, but retain the original public benefit language related to installation of sidewalks, as noted:
 Install a conforming sidewalk, curb and gutter, street lights and joint trenching west to Pleasant Valley Drive
Staff notes that City Council has full discretion regarding the future use of the proposed in-lieu fee for the off-site undergrounding. Further, in compliance with the proposed conditions of approval, the applicant will continue to underground utilities along the project frontage (North Main Street), except for a single pole at the northeast corner of the site. This pole will remain as there is no space opposite the Oak Park Boulevard spur (south of the Oak Park Boulevard overpass) to put a new pole, which necessitates the placement of the pole to the north of the Oak Park Boulevard overpass.

8.1 Packet Pg. 271
Analysis
The approved public benefit package requires the off-site undergrounding of utilities beneath the Oak Park Blvd. overpass – a process that involves lengthy, complicated permitting and coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), a financial contribution to the City of $100,000, and a maximum expenditure of $75,000 for on-site artwork. Based on discussions with potential contractors, the applicant determined that the aggregate cost of the components of the project’s public benefit package jeopardizes project feasibility.

In exchange for relief from constructing the off-site undergrounding improvements to the north, the applicant is offering an additional financial contribution to the City. As currently proposed, the applicant would a) contribute $425,000 to the City in lieu of undergrounding utilities to the north of the site; b) contribute $25,000 for the library bridge project and $25,000 for affordable housing; and c) commit to a minimum expenditure of $25,000 for on-site public artwork. Compared to the total value of the adopted public benefit package, the revised proposal represents a combined value of $500,000. This amount is $325,000 more than the financial contribution that was part of the original project approval. These calculations do not account for the cost of installing a new sidewalk along the Oak Park Boulevard frontage, which remains a condition of approval. Staff believes the proposed contribution is sufficient to cover the cost to the City to underground the utilities offsite, though Council could determine how best to spend the funds.

Thus, Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed public benefit modification and find that the proposed public benefit package is appropriate and acceptable.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City would receive a $475,000 payment that could be dedicated to various projects that benefit the public. Further, construction of a hotel onsite would generate transient occupancy tax revenue for the City in the future.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through mailing of the public meeting notice to those with 500 feet of the project site, posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt the Resolution, approving the Development Plan and Architectural Review Permit amendment to modify the public benefit package and artwork contribution.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
 Continue the item to a later date with direction provided.

8.1 Packet Pg. 272
 Do not adopt the Resolution
ATTACHMENT(S):

A Proposed Resolution
B Applicant Information (including Development Plan Analysis) C Approved City Council Resolution No. 55-19
D September 16, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Plans in Attachment E, all other attachments available at the Planning Division
E Project Plans
F Public Notice
Prepared by: Troy Fujimoto, City Planner
Reviewed by: Ethan Bindernagel, Public Works and Community Development Director and Assistant City Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

8.1 Packet Pg. 273
RESOLUTION NO. __ - 22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, APPROVING AN

AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PERMIT (PLN 18-0198) FOR THE CAMBRIA HOTEL PROJECT AT 3131 & 3195 NORTH MAIN STREET AND 1531 OAK PARK BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, the applicant, Stratus Development Partners, submitted a General Plan Amendment, Planned Unit Development District Rezoning and Concept Plan, Development Plan and Architectural Review Permits application (PLN 18-0198) for a new hotel project at 3131 and 3195 North Main Street & 1531 Oak Park Boulevard, APN’s 170-092-050, -054, -055, -057, -058, -059 (“the Project”); and
WHEREAS, the General Plan Amendment (PLN 18-0198) established a new land use designation, Tourist Commercial, including conforming changes to the Development Potential table and add a new Community Development Program and Economic Strategy Goal and amend the existing General Plan Map to add this new designation; and WHEREAS, Planned Unit Development District (PUD) Permit PLN 18-0198 rezoned an approximate 2.5-acre project site from RB Retail Business zoning district to PUD Planned Unit Development district and included a PUD Concept Plan; and WHEREAS, Development Plan Permit and Architectural Review Permit PLN 18-0198 included demolition of two existing commercial structures and development of a new hotel and associated site improvements to include parking areas, landscape areas and tree removals; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., as further governed by the Guidelines to the California Environmental Quality Act, 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq., collectively, “CEQA”), the City of Pleasant Hill (“City”) prepared and certified an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) analyzing all potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from the Project; and
WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been duly, regularly and lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the Architectural Review Commission on July 18, 2019, and continued to the August 1, 2019 meeting date, regarding the proposed PUD rezoning, associated Concept Plan, and Architectural Review Permit, at which time all interested parties were invited to provide comments on the proposal; and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 55-19 approving a General Plan Amendment, Planned Unit Development District, Concept Plan (Rezoning), Development Plan Permit, and Architectural Review Permit (PLN 18-0198) for The Project; and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 54-19 certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report, Adoption of Environmental Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and Adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: A - Proposed Resolution (Cambria Hotel Project Amendment) Cambria Hotel – Development Plan & Architectural Review Permit Amendment (PLN 18-0198)