Pleasant Hill City Council
May 15, 2023

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
MAY 15, 2023
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM
The meeting will be held both in person at
City Hall, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523,
150 Southfield Ave. Apt 1201, Stamford, CT 06902,
and remotely via Zoom in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act Watch on YouTube at: www.pleasanthillca.org/councilmeeting To provide comments via teleconference, click on the meeting link and enter the meeting ID and Passcode:

Meeting link: www.zoom.us
Meeting ID: 829 4672 8683
Passcode: 716129
The meeting ID and Passcode will change each meeting. See more information on Public Participation Options below.

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 1 May 15, 2023
City Offices, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone (925) 671-5267

MAYOR TIMOTHY FLAHERTY COUNCILMEMBER SUE NOACK

VICE MAYOR MATTHEW RINN COUNCILMEMBER ZAC SHESS

COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN VINSON
Options for observing the meeting and participating in public comment are provided below.

Public Communication. The public is welcome to address the City Council on items on the Consent Calendar or other items not listed on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction during the general Public Comment period. There is an opportunity for the public to comment on other agenda items at the time they are discussed.

Comments are generally limited to three minutes.

Public Participation Options
1) Watch the Meeting via Youtube Livestream at www.pleasanthillca.org/councilmeeting. 2) Submit Written Comments by 4 pm the Day of the Meeting to [email protected] (comments received by deadline will be provided to the City Council before the meeting). Please specify that the correspondence is for public comment at the Council meeting. 3) Make Public Comment During the Meeting
When the Mayor invites public comment (or public comments on specific agenda items), you may participate in one of the following three ways:

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 2 May 15, 2023
a. Via Zoom
Go to www.Zoom.us using your computer/smart device and enter the Meeting ID and Passcode provided near the top of this page. We ask that you state your name and city of residence for the record when you start your comments. Please use the "Raise hand" feature in Zoom. You will not be seen or heard until it is your turn to speak. You will be invited into the meeting and asked to speak when it is your turn.
b. Via Phone
Call (669) 900-6833 and enter the Zoom Meeting ID and Passcode. Press *9 to “raise your hand” to alert staff that you wish to speak.
c. In Person
Members of the public may attend the meeting in person and may speak on any matter within the City Council's jurisdiction. Please fill out a speaker's card, available at the entry to the Council Chambers, and turn it in to the City Clerk Recorder.

If, due to a disability, a reasonable accommodation is needed to participate in this meeting, please refer to the Providing Accessible Communication to the Public Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and AB 2449 document online at www.pleasanthillca.org/accessiblecommunications and contact the ADA Coordinator 48 hours in advance of the meeting at (925) 671-5221 or via California Relay at 711.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available to the public in the City’s Public Records Portal at https://cityarchive.pleasanthillca.org/WebLink/ (click on City Council Agenda Packets) or by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 925-671-5221.

City Council Meeting Recordings and Broadcasts.

Recorded City Council meetings are broadcast on Comcast Channel 28, Wave Channel 1029, and AT&T UVerse Channel 99 on the Wednesday following the meeting. Video recordings are generally available within 48 hours of the meeting, and may be viewed on the City’s website at www.pleasanthillca.org/MeetingVideos and selecting “City Council” from the meeting groups.

Agendas are Available for Review on the City Hall official noticing bulletin board (100 Gregory Lane), at the Pleasant Hill Police Department (330 Civic Drive), the Pleasant Hill Senior Center (233 Gregory Lane), and on the City’s website at www.pleasanthillca.org/agendas. Agenda packets will be available to the public on the City’s website at the same time as they are made available to the City Council.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL

4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Council Meeting Agenda Page 3 May 15, 2023

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 Awards of Appreciation to Mike MacDonald for Service on the Commission on Aging from 2022 – 2023 and to Kathy Arras for Service on the Commission on Aging from 2015 - 2023

5.2 Introduction of Commission on Aging Commissioners Linda Fisher and Dana Simmons

5.3 Awards of Appreciation to Dave Kludt for Service on the Education Commission from 2018 - 2023 and to Jennifer Andersen for Service on the Education Commission from 2012 - 2023

5.4 Introduction of Diversity Commissioners Daniel Rodriguez, Lloyd Schine, and Zhanna Thompson

5.5 Proclamation Designating June 2, 2023 as Gun Violence Awareness Day

5.6 Proclamation Designating the Month of May as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
(Brief updates on pending City business without discussion by the City Council.)

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS

7.1 Reports from Councilmembers on Meetings or Conferences Attended at City Expense (A) Contra Costa Mayors Conference Hosted by the City of San Ramon on May 4, 2023 (B) Other Meetings Attended at City Expense

7.2 Announcements from Councilmembers

8. PUBLIC COMMENT:

The public is welcome at this time to address the City Council on items on the Consent Calendar or other items not listed on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction. There is an opportunity for the public to comment on other agenda items at the time they are discussed.

Comments are limited to three minutes per speaker. To provide public comments, please see the Public Participation Options above.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under “Consent Calendar” are considered by the Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate Council discussion of these items unless requested by a Councilmember prior to the time Council votes on the motion to adopt.

9.1 Approve Minutes for the Regular City Council Meetings of April 17, 2023 and May 1 2023, and the Special City Council Meeting of May 6, 2023

9.2 Approve Checks Dated: April 28, 2023 and May 5, 2023

9.3 Accept Update on Contra Costa Transportation Authority and TRANSPAC

9.4 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Approving Side Letter of Agreement With the Management Pay Plan Group to Add a New Classification to the Management Compensation Pay Plan and Align the Chief Technology Officer Salary with Administrative Service Managers City Council Meeting Agenda Page 4 May 15, 2023

9.5 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Approving Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments and to Provide for Public Hearing and Notice in Assessment District No. 20 for Fiscal Year 2023/2024

9.6 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Approving Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments and to Provide for Public Hearing and Notice in Assessment District No. 22 for Fiscal Year 2023/2024

9.7 Approve Appointment Recommendations to the Civic Action Commission and Contra Costa Transportation Authority Advisory Committee

9.8 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Authorizing the City Manager to Notify the Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce that They are Released from the Requirement to Conduct and Submit to the City a Financial Audit of the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District for the Period July 1, 2021 to March 30, 2022

9.9 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Approving a Second Amendment to the Agreement with Stay Pleasant Hill to Serve as the Owners' Association for the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Amendment

10. ACTION CALENDAR

10.1 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Approving the Funding for the 2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements Project and the Use of the American Rescue Plan Act Funds to Pay for the Crossing Guard Program for the 2023/2024 School Year

11. ADJOURNMENT
Next City Council Meeting: June 5, 2023

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 15, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: APPROVE MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETINGS OF APRIL 17, 2023 AND MAY 1 2023, AND THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 6, 2023

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Approve the minutes.

ATTACHMENT(S):

April 17, 2023 – Tentative Minutes
May 1, 2023 – Tentative Minutes
May 6, 2023 – Tentative Minutes
Prepared by: Carol Wu, City Clerk Recorder

9.1 Packet Pg. 5

MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
April 17, 2023
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 April 17, 2023
Mayor Flaherty called a Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:00 PM, complete proceedings of which were electronically recorded. The meeting was a hybrid of both in person and teleconferenced attendees. The meeting agenda was posted on the City Hall outdoor bulletin board at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA on April 14, 2023, by Deputy City Clerk Juanita Davalos.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Timothy M. Flaherty Mayor Present
Matthew Rinn Vice Mayor Present
Sue Noack Councilmember Present
Allen Vinson Councilmember Present
Zac Shess Councilmember Present

4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Mayor Flaherty stated that the City Council had adjourned from a closed session. Janet Coleson, City Attorney, reported that the City Council voted unanimously to authorize the City Manager to execute a settlement agreement with the nationwide opioid settlement involving Walgreens, Walmart, CVS, Teva, and Allergan.

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 Proclamations Recognizing Paula Barto as Police Professional Staff Member of the Year and Andrew Mundy as Police Officer of the Year 2022 Pleasant Hill Police Chief Scott Vermillion introduced Paula Barto and spoke of her accomplishments and contributions to the City and the Pleasant Hill Police Department.

Mayor Flaherty presented a proclamation recognizing Paula Barto as Police Professional Staff Member of the Year 2022.

Chief Vermillion introduced Officer Andrew Mundy and spoke of his successes in solving cases and of his contributions to the City and the Pleasant Hill Police Department.

Mayor Flaherty presented a proclamation recognizing Andrew Mundy as Police Officer of the Year 2022.

5.2 Proclamation Designating April as Arab American Heritage Month Mayor Flaherty presented a proclamation to Carson Sprott, Acting Chair for the Diversity Commission, declaring the month of April as Arab American Heritage Month.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 6
Attachment: April 17 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 April 17, 2023

5.3 Contra Costa Fire Protection District Update
Chris Bachman, Assistant Chief and Fire Marshal, provided an update on new programs and initiatives at the Contra Costa Fire Protection District.

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
June Catalano, City Manager, reported that:
 The City mailed postcards in various languages to all Pleasant Hill households regarding the hearings on the district-based elections;
 The Commission on Aging is conducting an online survey regarding “Aging Well in the Community”; and
 The City had meetings with the Pacific Coast Farmers Market discussing potential locations to hold a farmers market.

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS

7.1 Reports from Councilmembers on Meetings or Conferences Attended at City Expense
(A) Contra Costa Mayors Conference Hosted by the City of Concord on April 6, 2023
Vice Mayor Rinn reported his attendance at the Contra Costa Mayors Conference with Councilmember Shess.

Mayor Flaherty reported his attendance at the Contra Costa Mayors Conference. (B) Other Meetings Attended at City Expense
None

7.2 Announcements from Councilmembers
Councilmember Noack reported that she will attend a “test run” of autonomous vehicles at Bishop Ranch in San Ramon; meeting with Congressman Mark DeSaulnier on transportation challenges in the area; and participation in a webinar for California elected officials concerning online applications for solar permit processing.

Councilmember Vinson reported his participation at the Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District Easter Egg hunt; Rodgers Ranch Spring Expo and Plant Sale; GPAC Housing Element meeting; and Off the Grid.

Councilmember Shess reported his attendance at the Rodgers Ranch Spring Expo and Plant Sale.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: April 17 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 April 17, 2023
Vice Mayor Rinn reported his participation at the Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District Easter Egg hunt and the Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce mixer.

Mayor Flaherty reported his participation at the Pleasant Hill Elementary School Spring Gala and fundraiser.

Mayor Flaherty recognized Danielle K. Navarro, City Clerk, who will be the new Assistant City Manager for the City of Oakley.

8. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Flaherty opened public comment.

There was no public comment.

Mayor Flaherty closed public comment.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion (Rinn/Vinson) to Approve all consent items, carried as follows:

AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty
Mayor Flaherty announced that a correction to the minutes of April 3rd, regarding item 9.4 appointments to the Planning Commission, to show that it was Alex Greenwood who withdrew his application, and with Cindy Tunales still recommended for appointment to the Measure K Oversight Committee and David Field still recommended for appointment to the Planning Commission.

9.1 Approve Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting of April 3, 2023

9.2 Approve Appointment Recommendations to the Commission on Aging, Diversity Commission and Planning Commission

10. ACTION CALENDAR

10.1 Additional “Pre-Map” Public Hearing to Consider Composition of Districts for District-Based Elections and Schedule for Future Hearings Janet Coleson, City Attorney, introduced the item, the third “pre-map” public hearing, to receive input from the community concerning transitioning to by-district elections.

The following members of the public provided a written comment:
 Michelle Simone
 Xavier Gomez

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: April 17 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 April 17, 2023
The following members of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:
 Susan Hedgpeth
 Marian Shostrom
 Quy Tran
The following members of the public participated via teleconference to make a comment:
 Michelle Simone
 Marshall Lewis
 Andrei Obolenskiy
Jim Priest, Best Best & Krieger, was present via teleconference to answer questions asked by Councilmembers.

Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing.

10.2 Adopt Resolution No. 26-23 Denying an Appeal and Upholding the Decision of the Planning Commission to Deny a Variance Request (PLN 22-0294) for a SixFoot-Tall Fence Within a Required Front Yard in an R-10 Residential Zoning District at 2029 Westover Drive
Mayor Flaherty explained proceedings and the order of hearing.

Andrew Shiflet, Assistant Planner, delivered a presentation regarding an appeal submitted by Christine and Kevin Finkas appealing the Planning Commission (“PC”) decision to deny a variance request to allow a non-permitted six-foot-tall fence to remain within the front yard setback area, where three feet is the maximum allowable height.

Kevin Finkas, Appellant, explained the reasons that a six-foot-tall fence was necessary for safety and livability purposes.

The following members of the public provided a written comment:
 Brian Green
 The family of Ken and Nancy Clark
 Al Saadeh
 Jerry & Cindy Lopez
 Terry Schmitt
 Myron Backhaus
 Telzey Gourley
 Joshua Welch
 The Osterholt Family

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: April 17 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 April 17, 2023
The following members of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:
 Trevor Gunnett
 Sheila Weston
 Joanna Kamburoff
 Al Saadeh
 Jason Willett (filled out a public comment card, but was unable to stay to make a comment)
 Betsy Webb
The following members of the public participated via teleconference to make a comment:
 Jennifer Ricketts
 Marshall Lewis
 Jessica Muldau
Troy Fujimoto, City Planner, Ananthan Kanagasanduram, City Engineer, and Ryan Cook, Senior Civil Engineer, were available to answer questions.

Motion (Noack/Rinn) to Continue item 10.2 and to direct staff to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, failed to pass as follows:

AYES: Noack, Rinn
NOES: Shess, Vinson, Flaherty
Motion (Flaherty/Vinson) to Approve item 10.2, carried as follows:

AYES: Shess, Vinson, Flaherty
NOES: Noack, Rinn

11. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Flaherty adjourned the meeting at 9:38 p.m. p.m. The next Regular City Council meeting will be held on Monday, May 1, 2023, beginning at 7:00 p.m.

CAROL W. WU, CITY CLERK RECORDER

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: April 17 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)

MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
May 1, 2023
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 May 1, 2023
Mayor Flaherty called a Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:01 PM, complete proceedings of which were electronically recorded. The meeting was a hybrid of both in person and teleconferenced attendees. The meeting agenda was posted on the City Hall outdoor bulletin board at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA on April 27, 2023, by Acting City Clerk Juanita Davalos.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Timothy M. Flaherty Mayor Present
Matthew Rinn Vice Mayor Present
Sue Noack Councilmember Present
Allen Vinson Councilmember Present
Zac Shess Councilmember Present

4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
No meetings were held and there is nothing to report.

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 Proclamation Designating May as Building Safety Month Mayor Flaherty presented a proclamation to Geoff Simmons, Chief Building Official, declaring the month of May as Building Safety Month.

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
June Catalano, City Manager, reported that:
 The recent Golden State Warriors watch party at Off the Grid was well attended;  The Pleasant Hill Perks Gift Card program will restart on May 2, 2023; and  The Website and Social Media Technical Assistance Grants program for local businesses will launch on May 2, 2023.

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS

7.1 Reports from Councilmembers on Meetings or Conferences Attended at City Expense
None

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: May 1 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 May 1, 2023

7.2 Announcements from Councilmembers
Councilmember Noack reported her attendance at a two day Metropolitan Transportation Commission workshop discussing Bay Area housing and transportation issues, and at an Education Commission meeting regarding opportunities to improve school crossing guard intersections.

Vice Mayor Rinn reported on his work as the City’s representative on the Marin Clean Energy Board of Directors.

Mayor Flaherty reported his participation at the Valhalla Middle School Gala and fundraiser.

Mayor Flaherty reported his attendance at the Warriors watch party.

8. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Flaherty opened public comment.

The following members of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:
 Khulood Jamil
 Maria Catania
 Mervat Gamal
Mayor Flaherty closed public comment.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion (Rinn/Vinson) to Approve all consent items, excluding items 9.5 and 9.6, which have been continued, carried as follows:

AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty

9.1 Approve Checks Dated: March 31, 2023; April 7, 2023; April 14, 2023; April 21, 2023

9.2 Approve Appointment Recommendations to the Civic Action Commission, Diversity Commission, Education Commission and Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (County Connection) Advisory Committee

9.3 Renewal of Ordinance No. 954 Approving All Specialized or Military Equipment Available for Use by the Pleasant Hill Police Department, per the Military Equipment Use Policy Required by CA Assembly Bill No. 481

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: May 1 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 May 1, 2023

9.4 Adopt Resolution No. 27-23 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement for FY 2023/24-2025/26 with RSG, Inc. for Financial and Administrative Services for the Redevelopment and Housing Successor Agencies

9.5 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Authorizing the City Manager to Notify the Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce that They are Released from the Requirement to Conduct and Submit to the City a Financial Audit of the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District for the Period July 1, 2021 to March 30, 2022 – Continued to the City Council Meeting of May 15, 2023.

9.6 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Approving a Second Amendment to the Agreement with Stay Pleasant Hill to Serve as the Owner's Association for the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Amendment – Continued to the City Council Meeting of May 15, 2023.

10. ACTION CALENDAR

10.1 Adopt Resolution No. 28-23 Accepting Bid and Awarding a Construction Contract for the Taylor Boulevard Improvements Project (Civic Drive to Ruth Drive), Project No. 01-23; and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Contract with Kerex Engineering, Inc.

Deirdre Castillo, Senior Engineer, delivered a presentation regarding the Taylor Boulevard Improvements Project and the lowest responsive, responsible bid submitted by Kerex Engineering, Inc.

No one from the public spoke on the item.

Motion (Noack/Rinn) to Approve item 10.1, carried as follows:

AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty

10.2 Adopt Resolution No. 29-23 Authorizing an Increase of the BHM Construction, Inc. Purchase Order in the Amount of $743,616 (Previously Approved Scope) for the Pleasant Hill Library Project No. 06-20
Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer, delivered a presentation explaining the rationale for an increase of the BHM Construction, Inc. purchase order for the Pleasant Hill Library project.

No one from the public spoke on the item.

Motion (Noack/Rinn) to Approve item 10.2, carried as follows:

AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty

10.3 Public Hearing to Consider Draft Maps and Composition of Districts for By-District Elections

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: May 1 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 May 1, 2023
Janet Coleson, City Attorney, introduced the item, the first “post-map” public hearing, to receive input from the community concerning transitioning to by-district elections.

The following members of the public provided a written comment:
 James Anderson
 Karen Yapp
 Susan Hedgpeth (2)
 Michelle Simone
 Cathy Teegardin
 Anne Greenblatt
 Quy Tran
The following members of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:
 Valerie Sloven
 Amanda Szakats
 Nik Martinez
 Marshall Lewis
 Zhanna Thompson
 Andrei Obolenskiy
 Karen Yapp (with map)
 Dick Offerman
 Susan Hedgpeth
 Yehudit Lieberman
 Steve Spafford
 Quy Tran
 Michelle Simone
The following members of the public participated via teleconference to make a comment:
 Roxanne Carillo Garza
 Lindsey Dohlman
 Kathy Gallagher, League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley  Bryan Thompson
Jim Priest, Best Best & Krieger, was present via teleconference to answer questions asked by Councilmembers.

Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing.

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: May 1 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 May 1, 2023
Councilmembers commented on the demographer’s maps and the process to consider the maps.

11. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Flaherty adjourned the meeting at 9:02 p.m. p.m. The next Special City Council meeting will be held on Saturday, May 6, 2023, beginning at 2:00 p.m.

CAROL W. WU, CITY CLERK RECORDER

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: May 1 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)

MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
May 6, 2023
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 May 6, 2023
Mayor Flaherty called a Special Meeting of the City Council to order at 2:00 PM, complete proceedings of which were electronically recorded. The meeting was a hybrid of both in person and teleconferenced attendees. The meeting agenda was posted on the City Hall outdoor bulletin board at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA on May 4, 2023, by Acting City Clerk Juanita Davalos.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Timothy M. Flaherty Mayor Present
Matthew Rinn Vice Mayor Present
Sue Noack Councilmember Present
Allen Vinson Councilmember Absent
Zac Shess Councilmember Present

3. ACTION CALENDAR

3.1 Public Hearing to Consider Draft Maps and Composition of Districts for ByDistrict Elections Mayor Flaherty explained the purpose and procedures of the special meeting.

Janet Coleson, City Attorney, introduced the item, the second “post-map” public hearing, to receive input from the community concerning transitioning to by-district elections.

The following members of the public provided a written comment:
 Quy Tran
 Brian Dodge
The following members of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:
 A. Nuluthando L. Williams
 Cassius Peters
 Lindsey Dohlman
 Zhanna Thompson
 Quy Tran
 Karen Yapp
 Dick Offerman
 Roxanne Carrilo Garza
 Marian Shostrom
 Robert Kattenberg
 David Calder
 Alex Khalfin
 Marshall Lewis
 Brooklyn Joseph

9.1.c
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: May 6 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 May 6, 2023
The following members of the public participated via teleconference to make a comment:
 Brian Thompson
 Susan Hedgpath
 Zhanna Thompson
Jim Priest, Best Best & Krieger, was present via teleconference to answer questions asked by Councilmembers.

Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing.

4. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Flaherty adjourned the meeting at 3:51 p.m. p.m. The next Regular City Council meeting will be held on Monday, May 15, 2023, beginning at 7:00 p.m.

CAROL W. WU, CITY CLERK RECORDER

9.1.c
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: May 6 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 15, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: APPROVE CHECKS DATED: APRIL 28, 2023 AND MAY 5, 2023

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Approve the check register.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Check Register
Prepared by: Pam Chamberlin, Accounting Technician I
Approved by: Erick Cheung, Finance Manager

9.2 Packet Pg. 18

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 15, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ACCEPT UPDATE ON CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY AND TRANSPAC

SYNOPSIS
TRANSPAC meets to provide direction to its staff and make recommendations to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) on significant transportation and land use issues. The attachments to this report include the CCTA Executive summary and Board meeting minutes for February 15, 2023 and March 15, 2023 and the TRANSPAC Committee meeting summary minutes for March 9, 2023.

DISCUSSION
Background
TRANSPAC was formed in 1986 to provide the cities of Central Contra Costa County a forum to discuss mutual planning and transportation issues. When Measure C, a countywide transportation proposition, was adopted in 1988, TRANSPAC became the official regional transportation, land use, and housing forum for Central Contra Costa County. The member agencies include Contra Costa County, Clayton, Concord, Martinez, Walnut Creek, and Pleasant Hill.

TRANSPAC meets to discuss transportation-related issues. A Councilmember and a Planning Commissioner represent each jurisdiction. The Chair to the CCTA then submits the actions.

Analysis
An Executive Summary of the actions taken on February 15, 2023 and March 15, 2023 at the CCTA Board meetings is included along with the meeting minutes. The actions taken at the TRANSPAC Committee meeting on March 9, 2023 are included in the attached minutes.

There is no item of discussion directly related to the City of Pleasant Hill with this update.

FISCAL IMPACT
None

9.3 Packet Pg. 43

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department.

The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Accept the report.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
The City Council may want to discuss one or more of the actions taken during the last meeting.

Should the City Council require detailed information pertaining to any issues, a comprehensive report could be scheduled for a subsequent City Council meeting. Contingent on the amount of information required, staff would need adequate time to prepare a comprehensive report addressing the item or items.

ATTACHMENT(S):

CCTA Executive Summary and Board Meeting Minutes for February 15, 2023 CCTA Executive Summary and Board Meeting Minutes for March 15, 2023 TRANSPAC Committee Meeting Summary Minutes for March 9, 2023 Prepared and Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

9.3 Packet Pg. 44

COMMISSIONERS
Federal Glover,
Chair
Newell Arnerich,
Vice Chair
Ken Carlson
Paul Fadelli
Loella Haskew
David Hudson
Chris Kelley
Aaron Meadows
Sue Noack
Renata Sos
Lamar Thorpe
Timothy Haile,
Executive Director
2999 Oak Road
Suite 100
Walnut Creek
CA 94597
PHONE: 925.256.4700
FAX: 925.256.4701
www.ccta.net
https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2023/February 15, 2023 RTPC Memo.doc

MEMORANDUM
To: Matt Todd, TRANSPAC
Chris Weeks, SWAT
Robert Sarmiento, TRANSPLAN
Chris Weeks, TVTC
John Nemeth, WCCTAC
Patrick Golier, LPMC
From: Timothy Haile, Executive Director
Date: February 17, 2023
Re: Items of interest for circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs)
At its February 15, 2023 meeting, the Authority discussed the following items, which may be of interests to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees:

A. Approval of Fiscal Year (FY) 2023‐24 Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) County Program Manager Fund Expenditure Plan
Recommendation: Staff sought approval of Resolution 23‐05‐G, incorporating the Authority’s FY 2023‐24 TFCA Expenditure Plan and allocation of County Program Manager TFCA funds in the amount of $1,694,862, and authorization for the Executive Director or designee to sign and submit the Expenditure Plan Summary application to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.

Action: The Authority Board approved Resolution 23‐05‐G, incorporating the Authority’s FY 2023‐24 TFCA Expenditure Plan and allocation of County Program Manager TFCA funds in the amount of $1,694,862, and authorization for the Executive Director or designee to sign and submit the Expenditure Plan Summary application to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) RTPC Memorandum
February 17, 2023

https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2023/February 15, 2023 RTPC Memo.doc B. Approval of Work Plan to Update the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for 2023
Recommendation: Staff sought approval of the proposed approach, scope, and schedule for the 2023 CMP update.

Action: The Authority Board approved the proposed approach, scope, and schedule for the 2023 CMP update.

C. Authorization to Execute Fund Exchange Agreement No. 628 with the City of Orinda (City) for the Citywide Street Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project (Project)
Recommendation: Staff sought authorization for the Chair to execute Fund Exchange Agreement No. 628 with the City authorizing the programming of $2 million in Authority’s Local Partnership Program Formulaic funds to the City’s Project in exchange of retaining $1.8 million in future City return‐to‐source Measure J funds, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐ substantive changes to the language.

Action: The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Fund Exchange Agreement No. 628 with the City authorizing the programming of $2 million in Authority’s Local Partnership Program Formulaic funds to the City’s Project in exchange of retaining $1.8 million in future City return‐to‐source Measure J funds, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐ substantive changes to the language.

D. Consider the Conduct for Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the Authority for March 2023
Recommendation: Staff requested that the Authority Board, having reconsidered the circumstances of the State of Emergency, continue conducting hybrid meetings for the regular Authority Board meetings and remote meetings for all other legislative bodies of the Authority and special meetings of the Authority Board pursuant to the Brown Act provision exemptions of Assembly Bill 361 (AB361) and consistent with the Contra Costa Health Services’ encouragement of online meetings and recommendations for social distancing for public meetings, to adhere to the 30‐day reconsideration requirement ofAB361.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) RTPC Memorandum
February 17, 2023

https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2023/February 15, 2023 RTPC Memo.doc Action: The Authority Board authorized staff to continue conducting hybrid meetings for the regular Authority Board meetings and remote meetings for all other legislative bodies of the Authority and special meetings of the Authority Board pursuant to the Brown Act provision exemptions of AB361 and consistent with the Contra Costa Health Services’ encouragement of online meetings and recommendations for social distancing for public meetings, to adhere to the 30‐day reconsideration requirement ofAB361.

E. Bollinger Canyon Road – Iron Horse Trail Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing (Project 120025) – Authorization to Award Agreement No. 581 with Myers‐Shimmick Joint Venture (MSJV) for Construction Services, Contingent Upon Approval of the Award from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and to Authorize the Chair to Execute the Contract Following Caltrans and FHWA Approval
Recommendation: Staff requested award of Agreement No. 581 with MSJV in the amount of $21,617,973.07,for Construction Services, contingent upon approval of the award from Caltrans and FHWA, authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 581 with MSJV upon effectiveness of the contract award, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language of the agreement as required to conform to the approvals from Caltrans and FHWA.

Action: The Authority Board approved the award of Agreement No. 581 with MSJV in the amount of $21,617,973.07, for Construction Services, contingent upon approval of the award from Caltrans and FHWA, authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 581 with MSJV upon effectiveness of the contract award, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language of the agreement as required to conform to the approvals from Caltrans and FHWA.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
MEETINGDATE: Wednesday, February 15, 2023
MINUTESPREPAREDBY: Tarienne Grover
MEMBERSPRESENT: STAFFPRESENT: MEMBERSABSENT:

Chris Kelley, Chair
Federal Glover, Vice Chair/MTCRep.

Newell Arnerich, Commissioner
Ken Carlson, Commissioner
Paul Fadelli, Commissioner
Teresa Gerringer, Commissioner Alt.

Loella Haskew, Commissioner
Aaron Meadows, Commissioner
Sue Noack, Commissioner/MTC Rep.

Karen Stepper, Commissioner Alt.

Lamar Thorpe, Commissioner
Mark Foley, Ex­Officio Rep.

H.E. Christian Peeples, Ex­Officio Rep.

Colin Clarke None
Tarienne Grover
Timothy Haile
Jack Hall
Jacqueline Hill
John Hoang
Matt Kelly
Stephanie Hu
Hisham Noeimi
Brian Kelleher
Ivan Ramirez
Jackie Reyes
Sherri Sylva
Yuliana Tjeng
Linsey Willis
Amara Morrison, Legal Counsel

1. CONVENE MEETING: Chris Kelley, Chair
DISCUSSION: Chair Kelley convened the meeting at 6:00 PM. Commissioners Hudson and Sos were absent, Commissioners Stepper and Gerringer, respectively, attended on their behalf. The meeting was convened with a moment ofsilence in honor of former Authority Board Member Janet Abelson. Rep. Peeples was introduced as the new Ex‐Officio Rep. for the Bus Transit Operators.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public are invited to addressthe Authority regarding any item that is not listed on the agenda. Please refer to the Teleconferencing Special Notice for Public Comment guidelines.

DISCUSSION: Bruce Ohlson, Bike East Bay, spoke under Public Comment.

4. ELECTION
A. Election of Chair and Vice Chair for 2023

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 15, 2023

ACTION: Commissioner Thorpe moved to approve the election of Vice Chair Glover as Chair and Commissioner Arnerich as Vice Chair for 2023, seconded by Commissioner Noack. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐None
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Thorpe nominated Vice Chair Glover as Chair and Commissioner Arnerich as Vice Chair for 2023.

5. COMMENDATIONS
A. Outgoing Chair Chris Kelley
DISCUSSION: Chair Glover presented a Commendation to outgoing Chair Kelley.

Outgoing Chair Kelley provided outgoing comments. Commissioners provided comments of appreciation for outgoing Chair Kelley.

B. Outgoing Authority Board Members
DISCUSSION: Chair Glover presented Certificates of Appreciation to outgoing Commissioners Butt, Mitchoff, and White. Outgoing Commissioners provided outgoing comments.

6. COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
A. Assignment of Authority Board Membersto the Administration and Projects Committee and Planning Committee
ACTION: Commissioner Arnerich moved to approve the committee assignments to appoint Vice Chair Arnerich and Commissioners Fadelli, Noack, Sos, and Thorpe to the Administration and Projects Committee for 2023, and appoint Commissioners Carlson, Haskew, Hudson, Kelley, and Meadows to the Planning Committee for 2023, with Chair Glover unassigned to a committee, seconded by Commissioner Alt. Gerringer. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐None
Abstain‐None

7. PRESENTATIONS

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 15, 2023

CONSENT CALENDAR
ACTION: Commissioner Thorpe moved to approve the consent calendar, seconded by Commissioner Haskew. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐None
Abstain‐None

8. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Authority Board Minutes of January 18, 2023

9. Administration & Projects Committee ‐ Consent:

A. Approval of 2023 Regular Meeting Schedule
B. Accept Monthly Accounts Payable Invoice Report for December 2022 Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the monthly accounts payable invoice report for December 2022.

C. Accept Quarterly Cash and Investment Report for the Period Ended December 31, 2022
Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the quarterly cash and investment report for the period ended December 31, 2022.

D. Accept Quarterly Sales Tax Revenue Report for the Period Ended September 30, 2022
Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the quarterly sales tax revenue report for the period ended September 30, 2022.

E. Acceptance of Annual Single Audit for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2022 Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the Single Audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

F. Accept Consultant Agreement Amendments for VariousProjects Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 499 with Mark Thomas & Company to extend the agreement termination date to June 30, 2024, with no increase in budget, and Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No. 353 with Gray‐Bowen‐Scott to extend the agreement termination date to December 31, 2024, with no increase in budget.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 15, 2023

G. Interstate 680/State Route 4 Interchange Improvements, Phases 1, 2A, and 4 (Project 6001) – Authorization to Approve Task Order (TO) 2 Under Agreement No. 504 with Consor North America, Inc. (Consor) for Independent Design Review Services
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to issue TO2 under Agreement No. 504 with Consorin an amount not‐to‐exceed $175,000,to perform an independent review of the project documentsincluding Phase 4, and allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

H. Legislative Update
Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on legislation, along with addressing any questions that may arise. The Authority may take action on any item presented in the attachment or any State or Federal legislation pertaining to the Authority’s legislative program.

10. Planning Committee ‐ Consent:

A. Approval of Fiscal Year (FY) 2023‐24 Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) County Program Manager Fund Expenditure Plan
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 23‐05‐G, incorporating the Authority’s FY 2023‐24 TFCA Expenditure Plan and allocation of County Program Manager TFCA funds in the amount of $1,694,862, and authorization for the Executive Director or designee to sign and submit the Expenditure Plan Summary application to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.

B. City of Richmond – Lincoln Elementary Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Enhancements(Project 120062) – Request for Authority Board Approval of the 90% Design Peer Review
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the Technical Coordinating Committee’s recommendation to have the 90% design peer review approved by the Authority Board.

C. Approval of Work Plan to Update the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for 2023
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the proposed approach, scope, and schedule for the 2023 CMP update.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 15, 2023

REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS

11. Administration & Projects Committee ‐ Regular:

A. Accept Annual Audit Reports – Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and Auditor’s Report to the Authority Board for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022 Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the annual audit reports for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Staff will provide an overview of the reports, along with addressing any questions that may arise.

ACTION: Vice Chair Arnerich moved to accept the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and Auditor’s Report to the Authority Board for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, seconded by Commissioner Noack. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐None
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Brian Kelleher, Chief Financial Officer, discussed the award of the Certificate of Achievement from the Government Accounting Standards Board, provided an overview of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, discussed the analysis statement of net position and activities, provided a financial summary, and discussed disclosures in the financial statements. He introduced Annie Louie with Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP to provide an overview of the Auditor’s Report.

Ms. Louie announced that there is an unmodified opinion on the Authority’s audit and the Authority has a clean audit.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

B. Authorization to Execute Fund Exchange Agreement No. 628 with the City of Orinda (City) for the Citywide Street Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project (Project) Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Fund Exchange Agreement No. 628 with the City authorizing the programming of $2 million in Authority’s Local Partnership Program Formulaic funds to the City’s Project in exchange of retaining $1.8 million in future City return‐to‐source Measure J funds, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐ substantive changes to the language.

ACTION: Commissioner Noack moved to authorize the Chair to execute Fund Exchange Agreement No. 628 with the City of Orinda authorizing the programming of $2 million in Authority’s Local Partnership Program Formulaic funds to the City of Orinda’s Citywide Street Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project in exchange of retaining $1.8 million in future City return‐to‐source Measure J funds, and to allow

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 15, 2023

the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language, seconded by Commissioner Alt. Gerringer. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐None
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Hisham Noeimi, Director, Programming, provided a background of the Fund Exchange Agreement, and discussed the restrictions and requirements of the Local Partnership Program Formulaic funds including local match, which makes them difficult to utilize, the benefits of the exchange which allows for the Authority to augment and increase the Fund Exchange Reserve to provide future match, address cost increases, and reduce the cash flow demand, and the City of Orinda’s benefit of having access to the equivalent of three years of future Measure J return to source funding starting on July 1, 2023.

C. NEW ITEM: Consider the Conduct for Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the Authority for March 2023
Recommendation: Staff requests that the Authority Board, having reconsidered the circumstances of the State of Emergency, continue conducting hybrid meetings for the regular Authority Board meetings and remote meetings for all other legislative bodies of the Authority and special meetings of the Authority Board pursuant to the Brown Act provision exemptions of Assembly Bill 361 (AB361) and consistent with the Contra Costa Health Services’ encouragement of online meetings and recommendations for social distancing for public meetings, to adhere to the 30‐day reconsideration requirement ofAB361.

ACTION: Vice Chair Arnerich moved to authorize staff to continue conducting hybrid meetings for the regular Authority Board meetings and remote meetings for all other legislative bodies of the Authority and special meetings of the Authority Board pursuant to the Brown Act provision exemptions of Assembly Bill 361 (AB361) and consistent with the Contra Costa Health Services’ encouragement of online meetings and recommendations for social distancing for public meetings, to adhere to the 30‐day reconsideration requirement of AB361, seconded by Commissioner Haskew. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐None
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Tarienne Grover, Director, Administrative Services, provided a brief background and overview of the provision exemptions of Assembly Bill 361, and the local health guidelinesthat continue to recommend measuresto promote social distancing at public meetings, which is the basis for staff’s recommendation for the conduct of meetingsthrough March 2023, with 30‐day reconsiderations.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 15, 2023

D. NEW ITEM: Bollinger Canyon Road – Iron Horse Trail Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing (Project 120025) – Authorization to Award Agreement No. 581 with Myers‐Shimmick Joint Venture (MSJV) for Construction Services, Contingent Upon Approval of the Award from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and to Authorize the Chair to Execute the Contract Following Caltrans and FHWA Approval
Recommendation: Staff requests award of Agreement No. 581 with MSJV in the amount of $21,617,973.07, for Construction Services, contingent upon approval of the award from Caltrans and FHWA, authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 581 with MSJV upon effectiveness of the contract award, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language of the agreement as required to conform to the approvals from Caltrans and FHWA.

ACTION: Commissioner Alt. Stepper moved to approve the award of Agreement No. 581 with Myers‐Shimmick Joint Venture (MSJV) in the amount of $21,617,973.07, for Construction Services, contingent upon approval of the award from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 581 with MSJV upon effectiveness of the contract award, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language of the agreement as required to conform to the approvals from Caltrans and FHWA, seconded by Commissioner Kelley. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐None
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Ivan Ramirez, Director, Construction, provided a background and overview ofthe Construction Manager/General Contractor procurement process, the use of an Independent Cost Estimator to compare cost estimates, the challenges with inflation and cost increases, and the contract award, which is contingent upon approval from FHWA andCaltrans.

Timothy Haile, Executive Director, thanked Mr. Ramirez and the team for bringing this project to construction.

Commissioners provided comments.

12. Planning Committee ‐ Regular:

A. Update on Recommendationsfrom the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the One Bay Area Grant Cycle 3 County & Local Program Nomination List (Resolution 22‐25‐G) and Regional Active Transportation Program Cycle 6 Projects

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 15, 2023

Recommendation: This is an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

DISCUSSION: Colin Clarke, Associate Transportation Planner, thanked the jurisdictionsin Contra Costa County for their support and projectssubmitted for the Call for Projects for the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Cycle 3 and Regional Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 6 projects. He provided a brief background and overview and announced that at least $48.5 million was received in OBAG Cycle 3 funding and the ATP. He announced that OBAG Cycle 3 programs provided funding for 12 projects in Contra Costa County, and that the Authority sponsored two countywide projects: Safe Routesto School Non‐Infrastructure and Smart Signals projects. Mr. Clarke announced the implementation grant award of $28.9 million from the Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Cycle 1 grant program and that the total funding from ATP, OBAG Cycle 3, legislated Congressional earmarks, and SS4A is more than $105 million. Mr. Clarke announced that the SS4A grant was the largest allocation in the State of California and second largest in the nation and will provide funding for safer streets for walking and bicycling in Contra Costa County and allocate $21 million to equity priority communities.

Timothy Haile, Executive Director, thanked staff for their efforts on the successful grant applications and funding awards for these projects.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from Commissioners.

Commissioner Arnerich left the meeting at 7:13 PM.

13. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter from Alameda‐Contra Costa Transit District dated January 20, 2023 RE:

Appointment of Bus Transit Operators’ Ex‐Officio “Primary” Representative to the Authority Board
B. Letter from County Connection dated February 8, 2023 RE: Appointment of Bus Transit Operators’ Ex‐Officio “Alternate” Representative to the Authority Board

14. ASSOCIATED COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Central County (TRANSPAC): Meeting Report forthe regular meeting on February 9, 2023 (Meeting handout if available)
B. East County (TRANSPLAN): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on February 9, 2023 (Meeting handout if available)
C. Southwest County (SWAT): Meeting Report for the special meeting on January 30,

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 15, 2023

2023 and Notice of Cancellation for the regular meeting on February 6, 2023 (Meeting handout if available)
D. West County (WCCTAC): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on January 27, 2023

15. AUTHORITY BOARD AND STAFF COMMENTS
A. Chair's Comments and Reports
DISCUSSION: Chair Glover provided incoming chair comments, thanked the outgoing Authority Board members, and welcomed the new Authority Board members and Commissioner Noack as the new Ex‐Officio Representative for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

Outgoing Chair Kelley thanked staff for their outstanding work, communications, and professionalism.

B. Commissioners' and Ex‐Officio Representatives’ Comments and Reports on Activities and Meetings
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Fadelli announced the memorial servicesforformer Authority Board Member Janet Abelson.

C. Executive Staff Comments
DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, thanked outgoing Chair Kelley for her leadership and service as Chair over the past year, welcomed the new Authority Board Members, stated that an item on the Office of Accessibility and Equity would be brought to the Authority Board in March, discussed the priority of advancing the organization into operations and maintenance, discussed grant awards, and announced that the Supreme Court dropped the Regional Measure 3 lawsuitso the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is working on allocating the funding. Mr. Haile discussed the state legislative trip to City of Sacramento with the transit operators to discuss the transit fiscal cliff, promote gap funding, and preserve funding for bus feeder service. He provided an update on funding for the bus feeder service after meeting with MTC and the Bay Area Rapid Transit, discussed the Dynamic Personal Microtransit procurement process, the Authority’s participation in the County’s Electric Vehicle (EV) Workshop and the start of an update to the Authority’s EV Readiness Blueprint, the launch of the Authority’s Patio podcast, and announced the hiring of Kathrina Yip as the Authority’s new Accounting Specialist.

16. CALENDAR
A. February, March, April, and May 2023

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 15, 2023

B. Calendar of Upcoming Events

17. ADJOURNMENT to the next regular meeting proposed for March 15, 2023 at 6:00 PM.

DISCUSSION: The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 PM.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes February 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update)

COMMISSIONERS
Federal Glover,
Chair
Newell Arnerich,
Vice Chair
Ken Carlson
Paul Fadelli
Loella Haskew
David Hudson
Chris Kelley
Aaron Meadows
Sue Noack
Renata Sos
Lamar Thorpe
Timothy Haile,
Executive Director
2999 Oak Road
Suite 100
Walnut Creek
CA 94597
PHONE: 925.256.4700
FAX: 925.256.4701
www.ccta.net
https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2023/March 15, 2023 RTPC Memo.doc

MEMORANDUM
To: Matt Todd, TRANSPAC
Chris Weeks, SWAT
Robert Sarmiento, TRANSPLAN
Sai Midididdi, TVTC
John Nemeth, WCCTAC
Sivakumar Natarajan, LPMC
From: Timothy Haile, Executive Director
Date: March 24, 2023
Re: Items of interest for circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs)
At its March 15, 2023 meeting, the Authority discussed the following items, which may be of interests to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees:

A. Senate Bill 1 – Formulaic Local Partnership Program (LPP) Funds Programming for Countywide Smart Signals Project
Recommendation: Staff sought approval of Resolution 23‐10‐P, which would authorize staff to nominate the Countywide Smart Signals project for the Authority’s formulaic LPP funds – Cycle 4 share in the amount of $2.498 million, and Resolution 23‐11‐P to confirm the Authority’s support for the project, which is required to program One Bay Area Grant – Cycle 3 funds.

Action: The Authority Board approved Resolution 23‐10‐P, which would authorize staff to nominate the Countywide Smart Signals project for the Authority’s formulaic LPP funds – Cycle 4 share in the amount of $2.498 million, and Resolution 23‐11‐P to confirm the Authority’s support for the project, which is required to program One Bay Area Grant – Cycle 3 funds.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) RTPC Memorandum
March 24, 2023

https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2023/March 15, 2023 RTPC Memo.doc B. Consider the Conduct for Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the Authority for April 2023
Recommendation: Staff requested that the Authority Board, having reconsidered the circumstances, continue conducting hybrid meetings for the regular Authority Board meetings and remote meetings for all other legislative bodies of the Authority and special meetings of the Authority Board pursuant to the Brown Act provision exemptions of Assembly Bill 361 (AB361) and consistent with the Contra Costa Health Services’ encouragement of online meetings and recommendations for social distancing for public meetings, to adhere to the 30‐day reconsideration requirement of AB361.

Action: The Authority Board authorized staff to continue conducting hybrid meetings for the regular Authority Board meetings and remote meetings for all other legislative bodies of the Authority and special meetings of the Authority Board pursuant to the Brown Act provision exemptions of AB361 and consistent with the Contra Costa Health Services’ encouragement of online meetings and recommendations for social distancing for public meetings, to adhere to the 30‐day reconsideration requirement of AB361.

C. Authorization to Execute Funding Agreement No. 629 with Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority (ECCTA) to Provide Transportation Network Company (TNC) Access for All Funds (Access Funds) to Assist in the Purchase of Shuttles for Expansion of the Tri MyRide Services Recommendation: Staff sought authorization for the Chair to execute Funding Agreement No. 629 with ECCTA in an amount not‐to‐exceed $400,000, in TNC Access Funds, to assist with the purchase of Wheelchair‐Accessible Vehicle shuttles to expand the Tri MyRide services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

Action: The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Funding Agreement No. 629 with ECCTA in an amount not‐to‐exceed $400,000, in TNC Access Funds, to assist with the purchase of Wheelchair‐Accessible Vehicle shuttles to expand the Tri MyRide services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) RTPC Memorandum
March 24, 2023

https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2023/March 15, 2023 RTPC Memo.doc D. Approval of the Town of Danville Calendar Years 2020 and 2021 Measure J Growth Management Program (GMP) Compliance Checklist Recommendation: Staff sought approval of the Town of Danville GMP Compliance Checklist and payment of $910,154 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2021‐22 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds to the Town of Danville, with a second (off‐year) payment of FY 2022‐23 funds on the one‐year anniversary of the first payment.

Action: The Authority Board approved the Town of Danville GMP Compliance Checklist and payment of $910,154 in FY 2021‐22 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds to the Town of Danville, with a second (off‐year) payment of FY 2022‐23 funds on the one‐year anniversary of the first payment.

E. Legislative Update
Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on legislation, along with addressing any questions that may arise. The Authority may take action on any item presented in the attachment or any State or Federal legislation pertaining to the Authority’s legislative program. Staff sought approval of an oppose position on Assembly Bill 316 (Aguiar‐Curry).

Action: The Authority Board authorized staff to take an oppose position on Assembly Bill 316 (Aguiar‐Curry).

F. Adoption of a Publicly Available Pay Schedule for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022‐23, Approval of Changes to Authorized Positions, and Approval to Amend the Authority’s Salaries, Benefits, and Compensation Plan for July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024
Recommendation: Staff sought approval of Resolution 21‐35‐A (Rev 2), which would amend the Authority’s Salaries, Benefits, and Compensation Plan for July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024, to: 1) add a Programs Manager classification at a salary range of $10,881 to $14,689 per month; 2) add a Contracts Manager classification at a salary range of $9,619 to $12,986 per month; 3) approve the associated salary ranges and classification specifications; 4) remove the Director, Programs classification; 5) reclassify

1.0 Fulltime Equivalent (FTE) from the Director, Programs classification to the

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) RTPC Memorandum
March 24, 2023

https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2023/March 15, 2023 RTPC Memo.doc Programs Manager classification; 5) add 1.0 FTE for the Contracts Manager classification; and 6) add 1.0 FTE to the Administrative Assistant classification, which will result in an increase of FTE positions from 21 to 23.

Action: The Authority Board approved Resolution 21‐35‐A (Rev 2), which will amend the Authority’s Salaries, Benefits, and Compensation Plan for July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024, to: 1) add a Programs Manager classification at a salary range of $10,881 to $14,689 per month; 2) add a Contracts Manager classification at a salary range of $9,619 to $12,986 per month; 3) approve the associated salary ranges and classification specifications; 4) remove the Director, Programs classification; 5) reclassify 1.0 Fulltime Equivalent (FTE) from the Director, Programs classification to the Programs Manager classification; 5) add 1.0 FTE for the Contracts Manager classification; and 6) add 1.0 FTE to the Administrative Assistant classification, which will result in an increase of FTE positions from 21 to 23.

G. Approval of Resolution 23‐06‐A to Adopt an Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Reasonable Accommodations Policy (RAP) for all Legislative Body Meetings of the Authority and Reject the use of Assembly Bill 2449 (AB2449) Procedures for Legislative Body Members Participation Via Teleconference under “Just Cause” or “Emergency Circumstances”
Recommendation: Staff sought approval of Resolution 23‐06‐A, which would:
1) adopt a RAP for all Legislative Body meetings of the Authority; 2) reject the teleconferencing procedures provided for by AB2449, which would allow members of the Authority’s Legislative Bodies to participate remotely via teleconference under “Just Cause” or “Emergency Circumstances”; and 3) provide approval for the Executive Director or designee to make changes to the RAP.

Action: The Authority Board approved Resolution 23‐06‐A, which will: 1) adopt a RAP for all Legislative Body meetings of the Authority; 2) reject the teleconferencing procedures provided for by AB2449, which would allow members of the Authority’s Legislative Bodies to participate remotely via teleconference under “Just Cause” or “Emergency Circumstances”; and 3) provide approval for the Executive Director or designee to make changes to the RAP.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) RTPC Memorandum
March 24, 2023

https://cctauthority.sharepoint.com/sites/Common/09Correspondences/RTPC Memos/2023/March 15, 2023 RTPC Memo.doc H. Review Strategy and Workplan to Advance theAuthority Recommendation: Staff sought input from the Authority Board on the Draft Workplan to advance the organization.

Action: This was an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time. The Authority Board provided input on the Draft Workplan to advance the organization.

I. Contra Costa County Integrated Transit Plan (ITP) – Authorization to Execute Agreement No. 630 with Sam Schwartz Engineering, DPC (Sam Schwartz) to Prepare the Countywide ITP
Recommendation: Staff sought authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 630 with Sam Schwartzin an amount not‐to‐exceed $1,801,948, to prepare the ITP, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

Action: The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Agreement No. 630 with Sam Schwartzin an amount not‐to‐exceed $1,801,948, to prepare the ITP, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
MEETINGDATE: Wednesday, March 15, 2023
MINUTESPREPAREDBY: Tarienne Grover
MEMBERSPRESENT: STAFFPRESENT: MEMBERSABSENT:

Federal Glover, Chair/MTCRep.

Newell Arnerich, Vice Chair
Ken Carlson, Commissioner
Paul Fadelli, Commissioner
Loella Haskew, Commissioner
Chris Kelley, Commissioner
Aaron Meadows, Commissioner
Sue Noack, Commissioner/MTC Rep.

Karen Stepper, Commissioner Alt.

Lamar Thorpe, Commissioner
Rita Xavier, Commissioner Alt.

Mark Foley, Ex­Officio Rep.

H.E. Christian Peeples, Ex­Officio Rep.

Colin Clarke
Tarienne Grover
Timothy Haile
Jack Hall
John Hoang
Stephanie Hu
Brian Kelleher
Matt Kelly
Hisham Noeimi
Ivan Ramirez
Jackie Reyes
Ying Smith
Yuliana Tjeng
Linsey Willis
Kathrina Yip
Amara Morrison, Legal Counsel
Renata Sos, Commissioner

1. CONVENE MEETING: Federal Glover, Chair
DISCUSSION: Chair Glover convened the meeting at 6:01 PM. Commissioners Hudson and Sos were absent. Commissioner Alt. Stepper attended on behalf of Commissioner Hudson.

Commissioner Fadelli had not yet arrived; Commissioner Alt. Xavier attended on his behalf until he arrived.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public are invited to addressthe Authority regarding any item that is not listed on the agenda. Please refer to the Teleconferencing Special Notice for Public Comment guidelines.

DISCUSSION: There were no public comments on items not on the agenda.

Commissioner Fadelli arrived at 6:06 PM. Commissioner Alt. Xavier attended from 6:01‐6:06 PM on behalf of Commissioner Fadelli.

4. PRESENTATIONS

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 15, 2023

CONSENT CALENDAR
ACTION: Commissioner Noack moved to approve the consent calendar,seconded by Commissioner Thorpe. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwisenoted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner Sos
Abstain‐None

5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Authority Board Minutes of February 15,2023

6. Administration & Projects Committee ‐ Consent:

A. Accept Monthly Accounts Payable Invoice Report for January 2023 Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the monthly accounts payable invoice report for January 2023.

B. Senate Bill 1 – Formulaic Local Partnership Program (LPP) Funds Programming for Countywide Smart Signals Project
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 23‐10‐P, which will authorize staff to nominate the Countywide Smart Signals project for the Authority’s formulaic LPP funds – Cycle 4 share in the amount of $2.498 million, and Resolution 23‐11‐P confirming the Authority’s support for the project, which is required to program One Bay Area Grant – Cycle 3 funds.

C. Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 578 with Baker Tilly US, LLP (Baker Tilly) for Executive Recruitment Services Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 578 with Baker Tilly in the amount of $45,000, for a new total agreement value of $105,000, to provide additional executive recruitment services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐ substantive changes to the language. The agreement termination date will remain through December 31, 2023.

D. Accessible Transportation Coordinating Entity Framework Stage 1 – Authorization to Approve Task Order No. 2 (TO2) Under Letter Agreement No. 601 with Fennemore LLP dba Fennemore Wendel (Fennemore) for Legal Services Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to issue TO2 under Letter Agreement No. 601 with Fennemore in an amount not‐to‐exceed $20,500,to

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 15, 2023

provide legal services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

E. Innovate 680 – Interstate 680 Northbound Express Lanes Completion (Project 8009.02) (Project) – Authorization for the Chair to Execute Task Order 3 (TO3) under Letter Agreement No. 601 with Fennemore LLP dba Fennemore Wendel (Fennemore) for Legal Services
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute TO3 under Letter Agreement No. 601 with Fennemore in an amount not‐to‐exceed $20,000, for legal services for the Project, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

F. NEW ITEM: Authorization for the Chair to Execute Task Order 4 (TO4) under Letter Agreement No. 601 with Fennemore LLP dba Fennemore Wendel (Fennemore) for Legal Services to Support Strategies to Advance theAuthority Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute TO4 under Letter Agreement No. 601 with Fennemore in an amount not‐to‐exceed $30,000, to provide legal services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

G. NEW ITEM: Consider the Conduct for Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the Authority for April 2023
Recommendation: Staff requests that the Authority Board, having reconsidered the circumstances, continue conducting hybrid meetings for the regular Authority Board meetings and remote meetings for all other legislative bodies of the Authority and special meetings of the Authority Board pursuant to the Brown Act provision exemptions of Assembly Bill 361 (AB361) and consistent with the Contra Costa Health Services’ encouragement of online meetings and recommendations for social distancing for public meetings, to adhere to the 30‐day reconsideration requirement of AB361.

H. NEW ITEM: Accept Internal Accounting Report forthe Six Months Ended December 31, 2022
Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the internal accounting report for the six months ended December 31, 2022.

I. NEW ITEM: Interstate 80/San Pablo Dam Road Interchange, Phase 1 Improvements (Project 7002) – Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. 528 with Fennemore Wendel LLP (Fennemore) for Legal Services Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. 528 with Fennemore in the amount of $11,000, for a new total agreement value not‐to‐exceed $301,000, to provide additional legal services,

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 15, 2023

and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

J. NEW ITEM: Innovate 680 – Automated Driving System (Project 8009.07) – Authorization to Execute Agreement No. 632 withHeex Technologies Corporation (Heex) to Provide Data Management, Data Extraction, and Data Visualization Services
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 632 with Heex, in an amount not‐to‐exceed $220,000, to provide data processing, data extraction, and data visualization services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

7. Planning Committee ‐ Consent:

A. Authorization to Execute Funding Agreement No. 629 with Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority (ECCTA) to Provide Transportation Network Company (TNC) Access for All Funds (Access Funds) to Assist in the Purchase of Shuttles for Expansion of the Tri MyRide Services
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Funding Agreement No. 629 with ECCTA in an amount not‐to‐exceed $400,000, in TNC Access Funds, to assist with the purchase of Wheelchair‐Accessible Vehicle shuttles to expand the Tri MyRide services, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

B. NEW ITEM: Approval of the Town of Danville Calendar Years 2020 and 2021 Measure J Growth Management Program (GMP) Compliance Checklist Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the Town of Danville GMP Compliance Checklist and payment of $910,154 in FY 2021‐22 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds to the Town of Danville, with a second (off‐year) payment of FY 2022‐23 funds on the one‐year anniversary of the first payment.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS

8. Administration & Projects Committee ‐ Regular:

A. Legislative Update
Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on legislation, along with addressing any questions that may arise. The Authority may take action on any item presented in the attachment or any State or Federal legislation pertaining to the Authority’s legislative program.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 15, 2023

ACTION: Commissioner Noack moved to authorize staff to take an oppose position on Assembly Bill 316 (Aguiar‐Curry), seconded by Commissioner Haskew.

The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐Commissioner Thorpe
Absent‐Commissioner Sos
Abstain‐Commissioner Fadelli
DISCUSSION: Linsey Willis, Director, External Affairs, discussed Assembly Bill 316 (Aguiar‐Curry), which would require a safety driver in all heavy‐duty autonomous vehicle trucks, and staff’s recommendation to take an oppose position.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

Rep. Peeples arrived at 6:11 PM.

Public Comment:

Bruce Ohlson, resident of Pittsburg
Nate Haderlie, representing the Coalition that submitted the opposition letter B. Approval of Fiscal Year (FY) 2022‐23 Midyear Budget for the Authority and Congestion Management Agency
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 22‐08‐A (Rev 1), which will update changes to the FY 2022‐23 budget.

ACTION: Vice Chair Arnerich moved to approve Resolution 22‐08‐A (Rev 1), which will update changes to the FY 2022‐23 midyear budget for the Authority and Congestion Management Agency, seconded by Commissioner Kelley. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner Sos
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Brian Kelleher, Chief Financial Officer, provided an overview of the proposed summary of changes, update on sales tax revenues, projected federal, state, and local revenues, capital project changes, and proposed expenditures for departments and debt service.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 15, 2023

C. Adoption of a Publicly Available Pay Schedule for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022‐23, Approval of Changes to Authorized Positions, and Approval to Amend the Authority’s Salaries, Benefits, and Compensation Plan for July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024 Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 21‐35‐A (Rev 2), which will amend the Authority’s Salaries, Benefits, and Compensation Plan for July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024, to: 1) add a Programs Manager classification at a salary range of $10,881 to $14,689 per month; 2) add a Contracts Manager classification at a salary range of $9,619 to $12,986 per month; 3) approve the associated salary ranges and classification specifications; 4) remove the Director, Programs classification; 5) reclassify 1.0 Fulltime Equivalent (FTE) from the Director, Programs classification to the Programs Manager classification; 5) add 1.0 FTE for the Contracts Manager classification; and 6) add 1.0 FTE to the Administrative Assistant classification, which will result in an increase of FTE positions from 21 to

23. ACTION: Commissioner Haskew moved to approve Resolution 21‐35‐A (Rev 2), which will amend the Authority’s Salaries, Benefits, and Compensation Plan for July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024, to: 1) add a Programs Manager classification at a salary range of $10,881 to $14,689 per month; 2) add a Contracts Manager classification at a salary range of $9,619 to $12,986 per month; 3) approve the associated salary ranges and classification specifications; 4) remove the Director, Programs classification; 5) reclassify 1.0 Fulltime Equivalent (FTE) from the Director, Programs classification to the Programs Manager classification; 5) add

1.0 FTE for the Contracts Manager classification; and 6) add 1.0 FTE to the Administrative Assistant classification, which will result in an increase of FTE positions from 21 to 23, seconded by Commissioner Carlson. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner Sos
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Tarienne Grover, Director, Administrative Services, provided a brief background of the revisions to the Publicly Available Pay Schedule, and discussed the Independent Classification Study for the new positions and the prior Total Compensation Study. Mrs. Grover discussed the establishment of an Office of Accessibility and Equity, Coordinating Entity, and an advisory committee based on implementation actions of the Countywide Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan, and the need for a Programs Manager to manage these programs. Mrs.

Grover further discussed the increased need for a Contracts Manager to manage grants, grant funding, contract administration, and risk, and the additional need for an Administrative Assistant to support these new efforts and initiatives.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 15, 2023

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

D. Approval of Resolution 23‐06‐A to Adopt an Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Reasonable Accommodations Policy (RAP) for all Legislative Body Meetings of the Authority and Reject the use of Assembly Bill 2449 (AB2449) Procedures for Legislative Body Members Participation Via Teleconference under “Just Cause” or “Emergency Circumstances”
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 23‐06‐A, which will: 1) adopt a RAP for all Legislative Body meetings of the Authority; 2) reject the teleconferencing procedures provided for by AB2449, which would allow members of the Authority’s Legislative Bodies to participate remotely via teleconference under “Just Cause” or “Emergency Circumstances”; and 3) provide approval for the Executive Director or designee to make changes to the RAP.

ACTION: Commissioner Kelley moved to approve Resolution 23‐06‐A, which will: 1) adopt a Reasonable Accommodations Policy (RAP) for all Legislative Body meetings of the Authority; 2) reject the teleconferencing procedures provided for by Assembly Bill 2449, which would allow members of the Authority’s Legislative Bodies to participate remotely via teleconference under “Just Cause” or “Emergency Circumstances”; and 3) provide approval for the Executive Director or designee to make changes to the RAP, seconded by Commissioner Alt. Stepper. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner Sos
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Tarienne Grover, Director, Administrative Services, provided an overview of Assembly Bill (AB) 2449, and discussed staff’s request to adopt a Reasonable Accommodations Policy as per AB 2449, and reject the use of the teleconferencing procedures provided for by AB 2449 due to the complexity, narrow criteria, and significant restrictions.

E. Review Strategy and Workplan to Advance theAuthority Recommendation: Staff seeks input from the Authority Board on the Draft Workplan to advance the organization.

DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, provided an overview of the Authority Board workshop held in September 2022, provided a historical background of the Authority and its legal authority and core functions, and discussed CCTA 4.0 and the three‐pronged approach of pursuing operational efficiencies, continuing to build on past practices and successes, and developing a new entity. Mr. Haile discussed projects and programs requiring operations and

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 15, 2023

maintenance, and operational and use case scenarios including private‐public partnerships, establishing a new non‐profit, and becoming a Consolidated Transportation Services Agency. Mr. Haile further discussed the 2023 operational milestones, 2023 Work Plan, governance structure, and next steps.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

9. Planning Committee ‐ Regular:

A. NEW ITEM: Contra Costa County Integrated Transit Plan (ITP) – Authorization to Execute Agreement No. 630 with Sam Schwartz Engineering, DPC (Sam Schwartz) to Prepare the Countywide ITP
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 630 with Sam Schwartzin an amount not‐to‐exceed $1,801,948, to prepare the ITP, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language.

ACTION: Vice Chair Arnerich moved to authorize the Chair to execute Agreement No. 630 with Sam Schwartz Engineering, DPC in an amount not‐to‐exceed $1,801,948, to prepare the Integrated Transit Plan, and to allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language, seconded by Commissioner Noack. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes‐None
Absent‐Commissioner Sos
Abstain‐None
DISCUSSION: Ying Smith, Director, Mobility Programs, discussed the Transit First Policy in the Transportation Expenditure Plan, which directed the preparation of an Integrated Transit Plan (ITP), and the intent for the ITP to serve as a blueprint for a customer‐centered approach for transit delivery in Contra Costa County. Ms. Ying discussed the timeline, funding sources, project budget, and major tasks including an existing transit assessment and market analysis, development of action plans to improve existing services and expand new travel choices, address institutional and policy challenges, development of a Capital Improvement Program, stakeholder engagement, and evaluation of the impacts of COVID‐19 on travel patterns. Ms.

Ying also provided an overview of the procurement process and development of the scope‐of‐work.

Timothy Haile, Executive Director, discussed the complexity of managing these countywide projects.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 15, 2023

10. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS

11. ASSOCIATED COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Central County (TRANSPAC): Meeting Report forthe regular meeting on February 9, 2023 and March 9, 2023 (Attachment and meeting handout if available) B. East County (TRANSPLAN): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on March 9, 2023 (Meeting handout if available)
C. Southwest County (SWAT): Meeting Report forthe regular meeting on March 6, 2023 (Meeting handout if available)
D. West County (WCCTAC): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on February 24, 2023 (Meeting handout if available)

12. AUTHORITY BOARD AND STAFF COMMENTS
A. Chair's Comments and Reports
B. Commissioners' and Ex‐Officio Representatives’ Comments and Reports on Activities and Meetings
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Haskew reported that she attended the California Association of Councils of Government Regional Leadership Forum in Riverside, CA from March 5‐7, 2023.

Commissioner/Rep. Noack announced that she attended the tour of four Northern Waterfront sites for potential ferry service terminals on March 13, 2023, along with Chair/Rep. Glover and Commissioner Kelley.

Chair Glover thanked Ying Smith, Director, Mobility Programs, for attending the tour, as well as staff from the Water Emergency Transportation Authority.

C. Executive Staff Comments
DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, introduced Kathrina Yip, the Authority’s new Accounting Specialist. Ms. Yip provided a brief introduction.

Chair Glover welcomed her.

Mr. Haile provided a preview of the upcoming Redefining Mobility Summit in San Ramon on April 18, 2023, and announced that the City of Concord met the night before to discuss the next steps with the development of the Concord Naval Weapons Station and that staff is developing site plans and business models with the GoMentum Station (GMS) Ad‐Hoc Committee. Mr. Haile announced that

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 15, 2023

the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will be releasing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking requesting entities like GMS to assist with the development of a national Autonomous Vehicle (AV) framework and may lead to the positioning of GMS as a national certified testbed for AV. He further discussed the recording of his second episode of “On the Patio” podcast to discuss the Authority’s Streets Smarts Program, and the Private‐Public Partnership (P3) Conference that he and Stephanie Hu, Director, Projects, attended last week and received vast interestin the Authority’s Dynamic Personal Microtransit project.

13. CALENDAR
A. March, April, May, and June 2023
B. Calendar of Upcoming Events

14. ADJOURNMENT to the next regular meeting proposed for April 19, 2023 at 6:00 PM.

DISCUSSION: The meeting was adjourned at 7:34 PM.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: CCTA Executive Board Summary and Meeting Minutes March 15, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) TRANSPAC Committee Meeting Summary Minutes
MEETING DATE:

MEMBERS PRESENT:

PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:

STAFF PRESENT:

MINUTES PREPARED BY:

March 9, 2023
Peter Cloven (Chair), Clayton; Sue Noack (Vice
Chair), Pleasant Hill; Carlyn Obringer, Concord;
Mark Ross, Martinez; Loella Haskew, Walnut
Creek; Ken Carlson, Contra Costa County; Kim
Trupiano (alternate), Clayton
Bob Pickett, Concord
Smadar Boardman, Walnut Creek; Saravana
Suthanthira, Concord; Ananthan Kanagasundaram,
Pleasant Hill; Melody Reebs, County Connection;
Matt Todd, TRANSPAC; Tiffany Gephart, TRANSPAC
Tiffany Gephart

1. Convene Regular Meeting / Pledge of Allegiance / Self-Introductions Chair Cloven called the meeting to order at 9:01 A.M.

2. Public Comments
There were no comments from the public.

3. Consent Agenda
a. Approval of Minutes:
• Minutes of the February 9, 2023 Meeting.
b. CCTA Executive Director’s Report Regarding CCTA Actions/Discussion Items c. Items Approved by the CCTA for Circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees and Related Items of Interest
d. RTPC Meeting Summary Letters
e. CCTA Meeting Updates and Countywide Information Links f. Continue use of Teleconferencing for Public Meetings by the TRANSPAC Board and Subcommittees Pursuant to the Provisions of AB 361. Approve the proclamation of a local emergency, ratify the proclamation of a State of Emergency, and authorize the continuation of conducting remote teleconference meetings of the legislative bodies of TRANSPAC for the period through April 10, 2023, pursuant to the Brown Act provisions under AB 361.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: TRANSPAC Committee Meeting Summary Minutes March 9, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update) g. TRANPSAC Committee Appointments – CCTA TCC Appointment for the Term April 1, 2023 – March 31, 2025. Appoint Jason Chen (Clayton), Saravana Suthanthira (Concord), and Smadar Boardman (Walnut Creek) as primary representatives and Ananthan Kanagasundaram (Pleasant Hill) as the alternate TCC representatives for the term April 1, 2023 – March 31, 2025.
h. INNOVATE 680 TAC Appointments. Appoint Saravana Suthanthira (Concord), and Ananthan Kanagasundaram (Pleasant Hill) as primary representatives and Abhishek Parikh (Concord), Ali Hatefi (Martinez) and Jaime Rodriguez (Pleasant Hill) as alternate representatives on the Innovate 680 TAC.

On motion by Commissioner Noack seconded by Commissioner Carlson to approve the consent agenda by unanimous vote of the members present (Cloven, Noack, Haskew, Obringer).

End Consent Agenda

4. TRANSPAC ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 AND 2021 WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT.

Commissioner Ross entered the meeting.

On motion by Commissioner Haskew seconded by Commissioner Obringer to accept the Annual Financial Report as of June 30, 2022 and 2021 with Independent Auditors’ Reports thereon by unanimous vote of the members present (Cloven, Noack, Obringer, Haskew, Ross, Carlson).

5. TRANSPAC CCTA REPRESENTATIVE REPORTS.

Commissioner Noack reported on the Administration and Projects Committee (APC).

Commissioner Noack commented that the APC elected a new Chair and reviewed the mid -year budget with minor changes to workflow and timing. Commissioner Noack asked the Board if they would like to hear reports from MTC going forward. Commissioner Obringer noted that she is interested in hearing the MTC reports. Commissioner Noack commented that RM3 funding will be a topic of discussion and that there is approximately $360 million committed to Contra Costa County and there will be a push for additional funds to be allocated.

Commissioner Haskew noted that the Planning Committee was canceled.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: TRANSPAC Committee Meeting Summary Minutes March 9, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update)

6. TAC ORAL REPORTS BY JURISDICTION
No member comments.

7. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS
No member comments.

8. MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT
Mr. Todd requested that the Board select a date to hold a special meeting to reauthorize AB361 exceptions to avoid a 30-day lapse. The board agreed to hold the special meeting on March 31, 2023 at 9am.

Ms. Gephart commented that Form 700s are due on April 3rd. Commissioner Noack commented that she sent her form to the TRANSPAC office. Ms. Gephart commented that she would follow-up.

9. ADJOURN / NEXT MEETING The meeting adjourned at 9:15 A.M. A special meeting will be held on March 31, 2023 and the next regular meeting will be held on April 13, 2023 at 9:00 A.M.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: TRANSPAC Committee Meeting Summary Minutes March 9, 2023 (TRANSPAC Update)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 15, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 APPROVING SIDE LETTER OF

AGREEMENT WITH THE MANAGEMENT PAY PLAN GROUP TO

ADD A NEW CLASSIFICATION TO THE MANAGEMENT

COMPENSATION PAY PLAN AND ALIGN THE CHIEF TECHNOLOGY

OFFICER SALARY WITH ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE MANAGERS

SYNOPSIS
The City is continuously seeking ways to better manage operations and streamline staff work. With the help of classification and compensation experts from the Human Resources consulting firm Koff & Associates (K&A), staff looked closely at various departments within the City, including the Human Resources division. Staff is seeking Council’s authorization to create a new classification in the management group to reflect the full scope of work carried out by the Human Resources Manager. This classification will replace the Human Resources Manager classification, which currently manages all human resources functions, including recruitment and selection, safety, training and development, employee and labor relations, and compensation and classification. The Human Resources Manager also serves as the City’s Chief Labor Negotiator, Risk Manager and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Officer. Staff took this opportunity to look at the other Administrative Services divisions including the Information Technology division. Staff determined that the Chief Technology Officer also had significant additional duties added since 2020, most notably maintaining the extensive technology at the new library and the multiple “zoom rooms” on City property.

Adoption of the proposed resolution would authorize the City Manager to execute a side letter of agreement between the City of Pleasant Hill and the Management Pay Plan Group (MPP) to update the classification of the Human Resources Manager to reflect the current duties of the new classification of Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO). In addition, the side letter would add the classification, CHRO, to the management compensation pay plan. Finally, the side letter of agreement would also align the salary range of the Chief Technology Officer with the other Administrative Services managers to reflect the additional scope of work and provide equity among the managers.

9.4 Packet Pg. 76

DISCUSSION
Background
In January 2020, the Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director left the City. At that time, the Human Resources Manager assumed the responsibility for the following functions:
 Serve as the City’s Chief Labor Negotiator, conducting meet and confer sessions and advising the City Manager and City Council on matters involving employee relations;  Serve as the City’s Risk Manager; and
 Service as the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer.

After a close review of the duties of the Human Resources Manager, it was determined the classification should be updated to the title of Chief Human Resources Officer to reflect the added responsibilities noted above, and the full scope of management duties, as well as modernization of the qualifications, experience and education sections.

When the pandemic struck in 2020, the City was forced to upgrade and expand its technology, including Que-Less, at home work stations, and “zoom rooms.” Additionally, beginning prior to the opening of the library in 2022, the Information Technology division began servicing the new building and its state of the art technology.

Analysis
The proposed change to add the Chief Human Resources Officer classification will more accurately reflect the scope, roles and responsibilities of the current Human Resources Manager.

There will be minimal fiscal impact, as the salary adjustment is minimal, but will account for the added responsibilities. If approved, the Chief Human Resources Officer will replace the Human Resources Manager classification in the budget. The Chief Human Resources Officer classification was sent to representatives of the Management Pay Plan (MPP) and no objections were received.

If approved, the City Manager will execute the side letter of agreement with MPP to add the classification of Chief Human Resources Officer and the incumbent will be reclassified as recommended by Koff. The proposed change to the Chief Technology Officer salary range will reflect the scope, roles and responsibilities of the incumbent and will provide equity among the Administrative Services managers.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed resolution will have minimal fiscal impact as the full time employee (FTE) count will not change. The impact to salary and benefits cost is approximately $24,888 annually and there is sufficient budget to absorb this change.

9.4 Packet Pg. 77

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Approve the resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Side Letter of Agreement with MPP to add the new classification Chief Human Resources Officer.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Do not approve the resolution.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 – Side Letter of Agreement - MPP
Prepared by: Colleen Duran, Human Resources Analyst
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

9.4 Packet Pg. 78
RESOLUTION NO. -23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

APPROVING SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH THE MANAGEMENT PAY PLAN

GROUP TO ADD THE NEW CLASSIFICATION CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER

AND ALIGN THE SALARY SCHEDULES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

MANAGERS
WHEREAS, representatives of the City and the Management Pay Plan group (“MPP”) tentatively agreed to the Chief Human Resources Officer title and job description; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City and the Management Pay Plan group (“MPP”) tentatively align the salary schedules of all of the administrative services managers; and WHEREAS, enactment of the proposed side letter would provide a more accurate and modern nomenclature of the organizational structure and equity amongst the administrative services managers;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that, the City Council does hereby approve and authorize the City Manager to sign Exhibit 1 Side Letter of Agreement – MPP, amending the compensation plan between the City of Pleasant Hill and MPP.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

9.4.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Proposed Resolution (MPP Side Letter of Agreement - Admin. Services)

ADDITION OF THE CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER JOB TITLE AND

SALARY ALIGNMENT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGERS

SIDE LETTER OF AGREEMENT

AMENDING THE MANAGEMENT PAY PLAN BETWEEN

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL AND

THE MANAGEMENT PAY PLAN GROUP
Subject to the approval of the City of Pleasant Hill City Council, the City and the MPP hereby agree to add the job title and the classification Chief Human Resources Officer to Exhibit A and Exhibit B in the Management Pay Plan that is in effect September 1, 2022 through August 30, 2023. The parties further agree to align the salary schedules of the administrative services managers to provide equity among the managers to Exhibit B in the Management Pay Plan that is in effect September 1, 2022 through August 30, 2023. Modified Exhibits A and B are attached hereto.

Except as set forth above, all other terms and conditions of employment remain unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect.

Agreed to this __________ day of ____________________ 2023.

City of Pleasant Hill: City of Pleasant Hill Management Group:
___________________________________ ____________________________________ June Catalano, City Manager Ling King, MPP Group Representative ____________________________________
Matt Kristic, MPP Group Representative
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Janet Coleson, City Attorney

9.4.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Side Letter of Agreement - MPP (MPP Side Letter of Agreement - Admin. Services) 23 EXHIBIT “A”
Management Classifications Covered by
the Management Pay Plan (as of September 1, 2022)
Accounting Manager
Assistant City Manager
Chief Building Official
Chief Human Resources Officer
Chief of Police
Chief Technology Officer
City Engineer
City Planner
Community Development Director/Assistant City Manager
Economic Development Manager
Finance Manager
Human Resources Manager
Maintenance Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Police Captain
Police Lieutenant
Principal Management Analyst/City Clerk
Public Works Manager
Senior Civil Engineer
Senior Management Analyst
Senior Planner
Senior Traffic Engineer

9.4.b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Side Letter of Agreement - MPP (MPP Side Letter of Agreement - Admin. Services) 24 EXHIBIT “B”

MANAGEMENT GROUP SALARY RANGES
EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 2022 – 3%

POSITION MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
Accounting Manager $11,289 $15,014
Assistant City Manager $14,021 $18,649
Chief Building Official $10,582 $14,073
Chief Human Resources Officer $13,386 $17,805
Chief of Police $16,578 $22,049
Chief Technology Officer $13,386 $17,805
City Engineer $12,391 $16,978
City Planner $12,391 $16,978
Director of Community Development/Assistant City Manager $14,818 $19,707 Economic Development Manager $11,289 $15,014
Finance Manager $13,386 $17,805
Human Resources Manager $12,607 $16,768
Maintenance Superintendent $10,659 $14,176
Maintenance Supervisor $9,805 $13,041
Police Captain $14,048 $18,685
Police Lieutenant $12,648 $16,822
Principal Management Analyst/City Clerk $13,512 $15,236 Public Works Manager $12,391 $16,978
Senior Civil Engineer $10,728 $14,266
Senior Management Analyst/Deputy City Clerk $10,728 $14,266 Senior Management Analyst/Public Info Officer $10,728 $14,266 Senior Planner $9,717 $12,924
Senior Traffic Engineer $10,728 $14,266

9.4.b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Side Letter of Agreement - MPP (MPP Side Letter of Agreement - Admin. Services)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 15, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 APPROVING INTENTION TO LEVY

AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS AND TO PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC
HEARING AND NOTICE IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20 FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

SYNOPSIS
An assessment district is a financial mechanism that allows for the levy of an assessment on a specific geographic area or parcels of real estate, which have been identified as receiving a direct and special "benefit" from a public improvement or service. Assessment District No. 20 (“AD 20”) enables the City to provide landscape maintenance and street lighting at an enhanced level along commercial streets. The properties within AD 20’s boundaries directly benefit from these landscape and lighting improvements. The annual assessments paid by the benefiting property owners of parcels within AD 20 and contributions by the City fund the maintenance and services provided.

In order for the City to continue to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment District for the 2023/2024 fiscal year, an Annual Report must be prepared and the City must hold a public hearing. Staff requests that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments within AD 20 for the 2023/2024 fiscal year and give notice of the time and place for a public hearing on the levy of the assessments.

DISCUSSION
Background
AD 20 was formed in 1988 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and the California Streets and Highways Code. Upon formation, AD 20 consisted of five zones. AD 20 was amended in 1999 to create a new zone (Zone 6) that includes the Downtown area.

In order for the City to continue to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment District for the 2023/2024 fiscal year (“FY 23/24”), the City Council adopted a resolution directing the Engineer of Work to prepare an annual report at its February 6, 2023 meeting. The Engineer of Work, Harris & Associates, has completed and filed the annual report (attached) for FY 23/24 with

9.5 Packet Pg. 83
the City Clerk. The Annual Report includes descriptions of the improvements to be made during the fiscal year, an estimate of costs, and the levy of assessments upon the benefiting properties.

Construction of Phase I of the Downtown tree replacement project along Crescent Drive is proposed to be completed in FY 23/24 in Zone 6. There are no new services or substantial changes in existing services proposed for FY 23/24 in the other five zones.

There are 17 properties within the AD 20 boundaries that are located in the City of Concord:
eight properties are located east of Contra Costa Boulevard and south of Sun Valley Boulevard; the Sun Valley Mall Shopping Center contains six properties, and the remaining three properties are east of Contra Costa Boulevard and south of Concord Avenue at the on-ramp to Interstate Freeway 680. The City of Concord has granted the City of Pleasant Hill authority to levy assessments on these properties since the District was established. This authority must be requested and granted annually. Pleasant Hill Resolution No. 6 -23, adopted February 6, 2023, requested consent from the City of Concord to collect AD 20 assessments for FY 22/23. The City of Concord adopted Resolution 23-22 approving the request on April 4, 2023.

A resolution of intention to collect assessment for FY 23/24 and call for a public hearing is attached.

Analysis
The collecting of assessments from properties within the boundaries of AD 20, together with the funds provided by the City, will ensure continued maintenance of lighting and landscape improvements within the boundaries of the District. City Maintenance staff provides for the maintenance of improvements, with the exception of the Downtown along Crescent Drive and Crescent Plaza (the Downtown property management contracts for maintenance work in the Downtown and is reimbursed by the Assessment District). The maintenance activities include weekly mowing and edging of turf; maintaining and repairing irrigation systems; pruning; removing debris and graffiti; repairing streetlights; maintenance and weeding, as well as paying for utility charges for water and electricity.

If AD 20 assessments are confirmed for FY 23/24, staff will continue to provide maintenance services for the District. The source of funds to provide the necessary maintenance and services is derived from annual assessments collected from property owners within six zones in the District. The attached Engineer’s Report lists the projected fund balances and proposed revenues and expenditures for FY 23/24 per zone. All of the zones with the exception of Zone 1 and Zone 6 have sufficient revenues and fund balances to cover FY 23/24 expenses.

The reserve fund for Zone 1 was depleted at the end of FY22/23. Staff recommends conducting a property owner assessment ballot process within Zone 1 so that assessment rates can be increased above the current allowable maximum.

In FY 22/23, Zone 6 was projected to have sufficient funds to allocate $90,000 to the Downtown Tree Replacement Project which is slated for construction in FY 23/24. The projected beginning

9.5 Packet Pg. 84
fund balance for FY 23/24, however, is estimated at $9885, therefore it was determined that the Assessment District budgeted contribution is not possible. Additional outside funding must be identified to complete this project.

Although our consultant cannot determine exactly why Zone 6 had an initial projected fund balance of $90,000 +/-, each year the overall fund balance must be reallocated to each of the 6 Zones. With the expenses changing from estimated to projected, to actuals, allocating the fund balance each year becomes challenging, especially when we consider that some Zones are trending positive and some are trending negative.

Moving forward, staff will work with our consultant and Finance to track the fund balance specifically for each Zone in the Assessment District. This will track the fund balance more accurately.

The reserve fund for Zone 6 will be depleted at the end of FY23/24. Staff recommends conducting a property owner assessment ballot process within Zone 6 so that assessment rates can be increased above the current allowable maximum.

The estimated cost for the preparation and filing of all necessary reports required to continue the levy and collection of assessments is $21,689, which will be paid from the assessment funds.

Assessments are made upon the various properties within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits received. As part of establishing special benefit, properties within the District are divided into six zones of improvement noted above with different assessments based on the amount of special benefit conferred. The City tracks the cost of maintaining the improvements, including incidental expenses within each zone. Contributions from the City’s General Fund are made by the City in Zones 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 to offset benefits shared with the general public. In Zone 4, in lieu of a contribution, the City pays for the cost to maintain a portion of the Canal Trail median at Gregory Lane. Assessment rates have been established in each zone based upon acreage, street frontage, and benefit. These rates are listed in the attached Engineer’s Report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Pleasant Hill annually contributes $97,946 from the General Fund toward the landscaping and lighting costs. This contribution is intended to offset the portion of the landscaping and lighting improvements that provide shared benefit to both the general public and, in particular, those properties outside the District but contiguous to District improvements in areas adjacent to or within the City’s right of way.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page. The Resolution of Intention will be

9.5 Packet Pg. 85
published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with the statutes not less than ten days prior to the public hearing.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt the Resolution of Intention.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Should the City Council decline to renew the Assessment District for the 2023/2024 fiscal year, there would be a loss of $431,901 in assessment revenues that fund maintenance activities within AD 20. The City would need to fund these maintenance activities, or the services would need to be suspended or substantially reduced.

ATTACHMENTS:

Proposed Resolution
AD 20 Engineer’s Report
Prepared by: Ann James, Public Works Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

9.5 Packet Pg. 86
RESOLUTION NO. __-23

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT

HILL TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS, LEVY ASSESSMENTS AND PROVIDE FOR HEARING AND NOTICE IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20 (COMMERCIAL AREA LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING) FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5-23, a Resolution directing preparation and filing of the Fiscal Year 2023/2024 (“FY 23/24”) Annual Report for maintenance of Assessment District No. 20 (Commercial Area Landscape and Lighting) (“AD 20”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 5-23, the City directed Harris & Associates, Inc. as Engineer of Work for AD 20, to prepare a report in accordance with Section 22565 et seq., of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Report"); and WHEREAS, the Report has been made, filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for FY 23/24 in order to accomplish the installation, servicing and maintenance of public landscape and street lighting as described in Exhibit A, which is incorporated by this reference and made a part of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, substantial changes in improvements that will begin in FY 2023/2024 in Zone 1 (paid from non-Assessment District funds) include: installing landscaping; shifting landscape water from domestic to recycled; replacing existing cobra-head lights with new, ornamental median and pedestrian lights; and adding a traffic signal at Contra Costa Boulevard and Alan Drive. Maintenance costs for Zone 1 are estimated to remain the same in FY 23/24; and WHEREAS, substantial changes in improvements that will begin in FY 2022/2023 in Zone 6 (paid from non-Assessment District funds) include: replacing existing pear trees with Chinese pistachio trees; widening existing treewells; replacing the existing irrigation system with a new, updated irrigation system; installation of new brick pavers and sidewalk. Maintenance costs for Zone 6 are estimated to remain the same in FY 23/24; and WHEREAS, no new or substantial changes in improvements are proposed to be made in FY 23/24 in Zones 2, 3, 4, 5; and
WHEREAS, the individual assessments for FY 23/24 in Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are not proposed to increase beyond the approved assessment range from the previous year; and WHEREAS, the assessment rate for Zone 6 is proposed to be increased by the annual CPI of 5.59%, which is within the approved assessment range for the Zone and does not constitute an “increased assessment” under the provisions of Proposition 218; and

9.5.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Proposed Resolution (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) WHEREAS, the proposed assessments in all of AD 20 will be imposed exclusively to finance the maintenance costs and operation expenses of landscaping and street lighting; and WHEREAS, the District consists of the lots and parcels shown on the assessment diagram of AD 20 on file with the City Clerk of the City and reference is hereby made to such diagram for further particulars; and
WHEREAS, reference is hereby made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements and services, the boundaries of the AD 20 and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within AD 20.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that:

1. The Report is hereby deemed sufficient and preliminarily approved, and the Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to this Resolution.

2. It is the intent of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within AD 20 to accomplish the installation, service, and maintenance of public landscape and street lighting as described in Exhibit A.

3. Notice is hereby given that on June 5, 2023, at 7:00 p.m., the City Council will hold a public hearing during its regular meeting on the question of the ordering of the proposed improvements and the levying of the proposed assessments for FY 23/24. The public hearing will be held both in person at City Hall at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, California and on Zoom (login details will be posted on the agenda). Prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any interested person may be afforded the opportunity to “hear and be heard” or may file a written protest with the City Clerk, or having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. A protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such owner.

3. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the public hearing by publishing this Resolution in accordance with Section 6061 of the Government Code. [Signatures on the following page]

9.5.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Proposed Resolution (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting of the Council held on the 15th day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

9.5.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Proposed Resolution (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24)

EXHIBIT A
TO

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT

HILL TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS, LEVY ASSESSMENTS AND PROVIDE FOR

HEARING AND NOTICE

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20
(COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING)
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
The installation, service and maintenance of public landscape and street lighting within the boundaries of Assessment District No. 20 (AD 20).

Substantial changes in improvements that will begin in FY 2023/2024 in Zone 1 (to be paid from non-Assessment District funds) include: installing landscaping; shifting landscape water from domestic to recycled; replacing existing cobra-head lights with new, ornamental median and pedestrian lights; and adding a signal at Contra Costa Boulevard and Alan Drive, for which maintenance costs funded by Zone 1 are estimated to remain the same in FY23/24.

Substantial changes in improvements that will begin in FY 2022/2023 in Zone 6 (paid from nonAssessment District funds) include: replacing existing pear trees with Chinese pistachio trees; widening existing concrete treewells; replacing the existing irrigation system with a new, updated irrigation system; and the installation of new brick pavers and sidewalk. Maintenance costs for Zone 6 are estimated to remain the same in FY 23/24; No other new or additional improvements are planned in AD 20 for FY 23/24.

9.5.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Proposed Resolution (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24)

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20
May 2023

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500
Concord, CA 94520
www.weareharris.com

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24

TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER….……………………………………………………………..1 PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS……………………………………………………………………..3 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COSTS………………………………………………………………………………….5 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ………………………………………………………………………….14 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT……………………………………………………………….15 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL…………………………………………………………………………..24 APPENDIX B – DISTRICT DIAGRAM………….……………………………………………………………...40 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT PARCELS IN CITY OF CONCORD………….………………………………41

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
AGENCY: CITY OF PLEASANT HILL
PROJECT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for Assessment District No. 20 (“District”) of the City of Pleasant Hill, to levy an assessment for landscaping and lighting services upon each lot or parcel of land in the District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 (“FY 23/24”).

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Pleasant Hill’s Resolution being adopted by the City Council for the:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART 1
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City and are hereby made a part of this Report by reference.

PART 2
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for FY 23/24.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
2 PART 3
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the office of the City Clerk.

PART 4
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments as adopted by the City Council, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established at the time of formation. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Assessment Roll
Appendix B – District Diagram
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of , 2023
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
3 PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Assessment District No. 20 (Commercial Landscaping and Lighting) (“AD 20” or “District”) was formed in 1988 in order to provide and preserve a high level of landscape maintenance and street lighting on commercial streets within the District. AD 20 consists of six zones. They are managed as six separate accounts within the existing District. The locations of these zones are described in the table below, and are also shown on the Assessment Diagram included as Appendix B of this Report.

The Assessment Diagram, included herein as Appendix B, refers to the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for an exact description of the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District.

Zone General Locations
1 Consists of several areas along Contra Costa Boulevard, Chilpaningo Parkway, Golf Club Road, Ellinwood Drive, Woodsworth Lane, Cleaveland Road and Gregory Lane.

The Zone runs from the Pleasant Hill City limits to the north, to Gregory Lane to the south, and includes the Target and Sun Valley Shopping Centers. This zone also includes 17 parcels within the City limits of the City of Concord. 2 Located north of Hookston Road, south of Monument Drive, east of the I-680 freeway and west of Buskirk Avenue. Zone 2 also includes an area north of Lisa Lane between the Iron Horse Regional Trail and Monument Boulevard.
3 Consists of five non-contiguous areas. One is located along Oak Park Boulevard and Putnum Boulevard, between Monte Cresta Avenue and Keats Circle; the second is located along Oak Park Boulevard, west of the I-680 freeway; the third is generally located north of Coggins Drive, south of Mayhew Way and east of the I-680 freeway; the fourth is generally bounded by Astrid Drive on the south, the I-680 freeway to the east and the EBMUD Trail to the west; the fifth is generally bounded by Monument Boulevard to the north, Mayhew Way to the south, the Pleasant Hill City limits on the east and Vincent Drive to the west.
4 Consists of three non-contiguous areas along the north and south sides of Gregory Lane, between Twinview Drive and Khars Avenue.
5 Consists of three non-contigouous areas. One is generally on the northwest corner of Taylor Boulevard and Pleasant Hill Road, south of Paso Nogal Road; the second is on the north side of Taylor Boulevard, at Morello Avenue; and the third is along Taylor Boulevard, between Grayson Creek and the Contra Costa canal. 6 Located in the Pleasant Hill downtown area, generally bounded by Gregory Lane to the north, Boyd Road to the south, the I-680 freeway to the east and Cleaveland Road to the west.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
4 Improvements and Services Provided
The improvements and services provided in the District include the following:

1. Street Lighting Installation Maintenance and Servicing

2. Landscape Installation Maintenance and Servicing

3. Measure C Improvement Plans for Contra CostaBoulevard-Monument Boulevard - Buskirk Avenue (portions not included within Zone 6)

4. Installation Maintenance and Servicing of Appurtenant Public Facilities – Crescent Drive and Crescent Plaza
Documents for each of the above listed improvements, detailing the general nature, location, quantity and services provided are available for review in the City offices, and are incorporated herein by reference.

In Zone 6, along Crescent Drive, an irrigation and phased tree replacement study was conducted and a draft street tree inventory and sustainability guidelines book was completed, with a draft report submitted in May 2020. This study was originally budgeted in FY 18/19 but delayed until FY 19/20. Staff reviewed the draft report and shared the findings with the Downtown property manager to review a future phased tree replacement project dependent on available capital funds and reserves.

FY 23/24 Proposed Projects
Phase I of the Downtown tree replacement project along Crescent Drive was originally budgeted and proposed to be completed in FY 22/23 in Zone 6. Due to the fact that the Zone reserves were insufficient to fund the estimated $90,000, the project will be funded by outside sources. There are no new services or substantial changes in existing services proposed for FY 23/24 in the other five zones.

Sidewalk repairs
Minor repairs to grates and sidewalks have been made at various locations in the District to repair conditions caused by the City’s street trees. The City will continue to identify and address raised, sunken, cracked or broken sidewalk areas that could become potential tripping hazards to pedestrians throughout all six zones.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
5 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COST
The estimate of cost table includes, for each zone, the proposed costs for the coming fiscal year (FY 23/24), and a projection of costs for two additional fiscal years.

City Contributions
The total cost of the improvements in each zone has been reduced by a contribution from the City, as shown on the individual budget pages. The contributions in Zone 1, 2 and 3 are roughly equal to the estimated costs to maintain streetlights in these zones (formerly maintained with Uniform Street Lighting District No. 1 funds). The contribution to Zone 5-A addresses the general benefit conferred to residential properties from landscaped median maintenance on Taylor Boulevard and Pleasant Hill Road.

A $650 contribution to Zone 4 is made to offset General Benefit received from maintenance of the Canal Trail medians.

The contribution made by the City to Zone 6 offsets the estimated general benefit received by properties not within the District and the share of the City Hall maintenance not considered to be of special benefit to Zone 6 properties. The amount of this contribution is not changing from previous years, but a more in-depth look will be taken in the future.

These General Fund contributions also address any general benefits conferred to properties that may be outside the District boundary.

The table below shows an Income and Expenditure summary for all Zones.

The information shown in the table above demonstrates the downward trend of the total balances within the District.

While Interest, Assessments, General Fund Contributions and Expenses remain constant or relatively constant, the Balances continue to be depleted. This is due to additional improvements and enhancements provided by the District and City over the past several years and additional maintenance for those improvements and enhancements without an increase in assessments. Additionally, the assessment revenues in a few of the Zones are insufficient to cover annual operating expenses, including increasing utility and maintenance costs, and as a result, the balances continue to dwindle. City staff continues to monitor and evaluate the entire District and will make recommendations to reduce service levels or request increased assessments as necessary. FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 Beginning Balance - July 1 $129,998 $24,824 ($29,090)
Interest $15,117 $15,303 $15,494
Assessments $431,901 $437,220 $442,698
General Fund Contribution $97,946 $97,946 $97,946
Expenses $650,138 $604,383 $613,083
Reserve Fund Contributions/Deficits ($78,588) ($54,416) ($55,803) Annual Surplus/Deficiency $24,824 ($29,090) ($86,035)

INCOME AND EXPENSE SUMMARY

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
6 Total Reserve Balance
The Total Reserve Balance is the total of the Balance Forward, plus Revenues, minus Expenses. Any Reserve Fund Adjustments are contributions to the Reserve Fund to plan for future replacement needs or deductions from the Reserve Fund to keep the assessment at or below the Maximum Allowable Assessment for that Zone.

Budget sheets for the individual Zones are included on the following pages.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
7 Zone 1
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ (32,591) $ (94,657) $ (145,036)
Interest $ 5,589 $ 5,589 $ 5,589
Assessments $ 159,694 $ 159,694 $ 159,694
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 21,100 $ 21,100 $ 21,100 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 186,384 $ 186,384 $ 186,384

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 2,887 $ 2,974 $ 3,063
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 75,803 $ 78,077 $ 80,419 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 8,742 $ 8,829 $ 8,917 Proposition 218 Assessment Increase Project $ 14,150 $ - $ - Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance (3) $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Street Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 43,980 $ 43,980 $ 43,980
Utilities - Water $ 94,053 $ 94,053 $ 94,053
Utilities - Other $ 3,075 $ 3,075 $ 3,075
Advertising $ 529 $ 545 $ 562
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (4) $ 231 $ 231 $ 231 Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 248,449 $ 236,763 $ 239,299
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ (32,591) $ (94,657) $ (145,036) Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ (62,066) $ (50,380) $ (52,916) Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ (94,657) $ (145,036) $ (197,952) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ - $ - $ - Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ (94,657) $ (145,036) $ (197,952) Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (192 parcels) 138.352 138.352 138.352 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 1,155.60 $ 1,155.60 $ 1,155.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate(6) $ 1,155.60 $ 1,155.60 $ 1,155.60 Total Proposed Assessment $ 159,880 $ 159,880 $ 159,880 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 Costs to identify and repair large cracks & lifts in curbs and sidewalks as needed. 4 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 5
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 6 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment. * Expenditures exceed Revenue. Assessment balancing measure is needed in FY 2023/24.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
8 Zone 2
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 42,030 $ 47,708 $ 51,304
Interest $ 1,364 $ 1,364 $ 1,364
Assessments $ 38,970 $ 38,970 $ 38,970
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 25,194 $ 25,194 $ 25,194 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 65,528 $ 65,528 $ 65,528

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 530 $ 546 $ 563
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 26,112 $ 26,895 $ 27,702 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 2,252 $ 2,274 $ 2,297 Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000
Contractual Services $ - $ - $ -
Streetlight Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 3,788 $ 3,902 $ 4,019
Utilities - Water $ 22,712 $ 23,847 $ 25,039
Utilities - Other $ 145 $ 150 $ 154
Advertising $ 142 $ 146 $ 151
Supplies - Pesticides $ 106 $ 109 $ 113
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (3) $ 62 $ 62 $ 62
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 59,850 $ 61,932 $ 64,100
Reserve Balances
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 42,030 $ 47,708 $ 32,050 Reserve Fund Adjustments (4) $ 5,679 $ 2,442 $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 47,708 $ 50,150 $ 32,050 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ - $ 1,154 $ 1,428 Reserve Fund Adjustments (4) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ - $ 1,154 $ 1,428 TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 47,708 $ 51,304 $ 33,478
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (34 parcels) (5) 35.641 35.641 35.641 Total Assessable Linear Feet 2,497.87 2,497.87 2,497.87 Proposed Assessment Rate/Acre $ 774.00 $ 774.00 $ 774.00 Total Assessment per Acre $ 27,586 $ 27,586 $ 27,586
Maximum Allowable Assessment per Acre(6) $ 774.00 $ 774.00 $ 774.00 Proposed Assessment Rate/LF $ 4.58 $ 4.58 $ 4.58
Total Assessment per/LF $ 11,440 $ 11,440 $ 11,440
Maximum Allowable Assessment per/LF $ 4.58 $ 4.58 $ 4.58 Total Proposed Assessment $ 39,026 $ 39,026 $ 39,026 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 4 Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds.

Capital Reserves are being collected for irrigation repairs in the dog park. 5 Total EDU was derived by combining acreage and linear feet to determine actual assessment amounts. 6 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
9 Zone 3
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 48,367 $ 23,917 $ 23,708
Interest $ 779 $ 779 $ 779
Assessments $ 22,246 $ 22,246 $ 22,246
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 6,929 $ 6,929 $ 6,929 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 29,953 $ 29,953 $ 29,953

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 1,591 $ 1,639 $ 1,688
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 7,858 $ 8,094 $ 8,337 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 5,072 $ 5,122 $ 5,174 Replacement Project at Coggins Median (3) $ 25,000 $ - $ - Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance (4) $ 750 $ 750 $ 750
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 8,873 $ 9,140 $ 9,414
Utilities - Water $ 1,760 $ 1,848 $ 1,940
Utilities - Other $ 2,051 $ 2,112 $ 2,176
Advertising $ 312 $ 321 $ 331
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (5) $ 171 $ 171 $ 171 Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 965 $ 965 $ 965 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 54,403 $ 30,162 $ 30,945
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 27,202 $ 15,081 $ 15,473 Reserve Fund Adjustments (6) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 27,202 $ 15,081 $ 15,473 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 21,165 $ 8,836 $ 8,235 Reserve Fund Adjustments (6) $ (24,450) $ (209) $ (992) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ (3,285) $ 8,627 $ 7,244 TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 23,917 $ 23,708 $ 22,716
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (186 parcels) 80.269 80.269 80.269 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 279.27 $ 279.27 $ 279.27
Maximum Allowable Assessment (7) $ 279.27 $ 279.27 $ 279.27 Total Proposed Assessment $ 22,417 $ 22,417 $ 22,417 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 3% escalator. 3 Drought tolerant replacement project in median - currently grass. 4 Costs to identify and repair large cracks & lifts in curbs and sidewalks as needed. 5 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 6
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 7 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
10 Zone 4
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 8,469 $ 5,685 $ 2,639
Interest $ 218 $ 218 $ 218
Assessments $ 6,230 $ 6,230 $ 6,230
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ - $ - $ - SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 6,448 $ 6,448 $ 6,448

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 221 $ 227 $ 234
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 4,896 $ 5,043 $ 5,194 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 656 $ 663 $ 670 Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance $ 250 $ 250 $ 250
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 690 $ 710 $ 732
Utilities - Water $ 1,622 $ 1,703 $ 1,789
Advertising $ 41 $ 42 $ 44
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (3) $ 55 $ 55 $ 55
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 800 $ 800 $ 800 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 9,231 $ 9,495 $ 9,767
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 4,616 $ 5,685 $ 2,639 Reserve Fund Adjustments (4) $ - $ (3,046) $ (3,319)
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 4,616 $ 2,639 $ (680) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 3,853 $ - $ - Reserve Fund Adjustments (4) $ (2,783) $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 1,070 $ - $ - TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 5,685 $ 2,639 $ (680)
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (25 parcels) 10.389 10.389 10.389 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 605.00 $ 605.00 $ 605.00
Maximum Allowable Assessment (5) $ 605.00 $ 605.00 $ 605.00 Total Proposed Assessment $ 6,285 $ 6,285 $ 6,285 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 4
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 5 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
11 Zone 5-A
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 43,217 $ 43,864 $ 43,421
Interest $ 585 $ 585 $ 585
Assessments $ 16,709 $ 16,709 $ 16,709
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 14,807 $ 14,807 $ 14,807 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 32,101 $ 32,101 $ 32,101

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 243 $ 250 $ 258
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 14,322 $ 14,752 $ 15,194 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 1,288 $ 1,301 $ 1,314 Contractual Services $ - $ - $ -
Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance (3) $ 500 $ 500 $ 500
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 2,470 $ 2,544 $ 2,620
Utilities - Water $ 10,815 $ 11,356 $ 11,924
Utilities - Other $ 789 $ 813 $ 837
Advertising $ 79 $ 82 $ 84
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (4) $ 47 $ 47 $ 47
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 900 $ 900 $ 900 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 31,453 $ 32,544 $ 33,678
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 15,727 $ 16,272 $ 16,839 Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 15,727 $ 16,272 $ 16,839 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 27,490 $ 27,592 $ 26,582 Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ 647 $ (443) $ (1,577)
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 28,138 $ 27,149 $ 25,004 TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 43,864 $ 43,421 $ 41,843
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (16 parcels) 20.390 20.390 20.390 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 821.76 $ 821.76 $ 821.76
Maximum Allowable Assessment (6) $ 821.76 $ 821.76 $ 821.76 Total Proposed Assessment $ 16,756 $ 16,756 $ 16,756 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 Costs to identify and repair large cracks & lifts in curbs and sidewalks as needed. 4 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 5
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 6 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
12 Zone 5-B
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 10,622 $ 5,351 $ (856)
Interest $ 323 $ 323 $ 323
Assessments $ 9,238 $ 9,238 $ 9,238
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 12,278 $ 12,278 $ 12,278 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 21,839 $ 21,839 $ 21,839

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 202 $ 208 $ 214
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 12,687 $ 13,067 $ 13,459 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 1,133 $ 1,144 $ 1,155 Contractual Services $ - $ - $ -
Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance (3) $ 500 $ 500 $ 500
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 2,049 $ 2,110 $ 2,173
Utilities - Water $ 9,095 $ 9,550 $ 10,028
Utilities - Other $ 654 $ 674 $ 694
Advertising $ 66 $ 68 $ 70
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (4) $ 50 $ 50 $ 50
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 675 $ 675 $ 675 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 27,110 $ 28,046 $ 29,019
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 10,622 $ 5,351 $ (856) Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ (5,271) $ (6,207) $ (7,180) Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 5,351 $ (856) $ (8,036) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ - $ - $ - Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 5,351 $ (856) $ (8,036)
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (27 parcels) 17.926 17.926 17.926 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 517.88 $ 517.88 $ 517.88
Maximum Allowable Assessment (6) $ 517.88 $ 517.88 $ 517.88 Total Proposed Assessment $ 9,284 $ 9,284 $ 9,284 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 One-time cost to identify and repair large cracks & lifts in curbs and sidewalks. 4 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 5
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 6 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment. * If expenditures continue at the projected rate, assessment balancing measures will be needed in FY 2025/26.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
13 Zone 6
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 9,885 $ (7,045) $ (4,270)
Interest $ 6,258 $ 6,445 $ 6,636
Assessments (1) $ 178,814 $ 184,133 $ 189,611
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 17,638 $ 17,638 $ 17,638 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 202,711 $ 208,215 $ 213,885

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (2) $ 637 $ 656 $ 675
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (2) $ 5,148 $ 5,302 $ 5,461 District Engineering and Annual Report (3) $ 2,546 $ 2,571 $ 2,597 Contractual Services/Construction (4) $ 165,614 $ 165,614 $ 165,614 Tree Replacement Project (5) $ - $ - $ -
Assessment Increase Project (5) $ 15,000 $ - $ -
Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Streetlight Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 18,224 $ 18,224 $ 18,224
Utilities - Water $ 11,670 $ 12,253 $ 12,866
Utilities - Other $ 400 $ 412 $ 424
Advertising $ 152 $ 157 $ 162
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (6) $ 50 $ 50 $ 50
Project Administration $ - $ - $ -
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 219,641 $ 205,440 $ 206,274
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 9,885 $ (7,045) $ (4,270) Reserve Fund Adjustments (7) $ (16,930) $ 2,776 $ 7,611 Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ (7,045) $ (4,270) $ 3,342 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ - $ - $ - Reserve Fund Adjustments (7) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 (7) $ - $ - $ - TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ (7,045) $ (4,270) $ 3,342
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (22 parcels) 40.294 40.294 40.294 Total Assessable Linear Feet 1,128 1,128 1,128
Proposed Assessment Rate (8) Varies Varies Varies
Maximum Allowable Assessment (9) Varies Varies Varies 1 Assessments for 2023-24 have increased by the allowable CPI. Refer to page 22 of this Report for details. 2 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 3 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 4 Downtown Property Management Maintenance Contract. 5 Downtown tree replacement capital project. 5 Proposed Proposition 218 assessment increase project as expenses are exceeding revenues. 6 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 7 Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. and discuss with the Downtown Prop. Manager, and perform the work when sufficient capital reserve funds are available. 8 Proposed Assessment Rates were established at the time of formation, and vary for each Zone in the District. 9 Maximum Assessment Ranges are detailed in this Engineer's Report.

Other Areas: $1,155.60 plus $4.57/LF to $1,733.40 plus $6.86/LF of parcel frontage.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
14 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of each Zone within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District has been submitted to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Pleasant Hill, and is hereby made a part of this Report by reference.

A copy of the Assessment Diagram is also included in Appendix B of the Report.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
15 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
General
Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
— Streets and Highways Code Section 22573
The 1972 Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In November 1996, the voters of California adopted Proposition 218, which has been codified as Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. Proposition 218 imposed a number of substantive and procedural requirements on taxes, assessments, and property-related fees imposed by local governments in California.

The method of apportionment described in this Report, and confirmed by the City Council, utilizes commonly accepted engineering practices established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the California Constitution for the allocation of special benefit assessments. The calculation of assessments is based upon the parcel type and the services and improvements provided to equitably apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each lot or parcel. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is over and above any general benefit conferred upon said lots or parcels or to the public at large.

Special Benefit
The improvements and associated costs have been allocated to the assessable properties within the District based upon the special benefit received by those properties. The improvements for which the properties are assessed have been identified as necessary, were installed and are being maintained as part of the development plans. As such, the costs to maintain and service the improvements are strictly the obligation of the properties within the District.

General Benefit
Although the improvements may be visible to passersby or to the public at large, the improvements were installed as a requirement of the development of the tract and are for the sole benefit of properties within the District. It has been determined however, due to limited access or use by properties or individuals outside the District, the City will contribute an amount to account for the incidental general benefits conferred to those outside properties or individuals.

The City contribution is shown on the Cost Estimate pages in Part 2 of this Report.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
16 Definition of Special Benefit
The method of apportionment described in this Report is based on the premise that each assessable parcel or unit receives distinct and special benefits from the improvements and services provided, including the visual desirability provided by well-maintained landscaping. In accordance with Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution:
“Special benefit means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or the public at large” The special benefits associated with local landscaping improvements are specifically:
 Enhanced desirability of properties due to proximity and accessibility of the improvements.  Improved aesthetic appeal provided by a positive representation of the development, neighborhood and the community.
 Improved ingress and egress to property resulting in enhanced traffic flow, reduced traffic accidents and consequent reduction of possible property damage.
 Improved traffic visibility and circulation.
 Improved accessibility for emergency vehicles.
 Reduced vandalism and other criminal activity.

ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
To impose a new assessment or increased assessment in excess of the Maximum Assessment Rate for the current fiscal year, the City must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4c that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owners must approve the proposed new or increased assessment via a property owner protest balloting process before any such new or increased assessment can be imposed. A protest occurs when, at the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots opposed to the new or increased assessment outweigh the returned ballots in favor of the new or increased assessment, weighted by the financial obligation of each parcel.

The definition of new or increased assessments includes any assessment which, 1) did not previously exist or, 2) exceeds a previously approved assessment amount or assessment range formula. Any assessment range formula must have been previously adopted by the agency and approved by the property owners.

Assessment Methodology
It is generally recognized that most budgetary items will be impacted by inflation in future years. In accordance with the California Constitution, Section 53739 (b)(1), assessments “may be adjusted for inflation pursuant to a clearly defined formula…” A formula for an inflationary adjustment is therefore included as part of the maximum assessment for this District and was approved by the property owner(s) at the time of formation. The formula, as described below, allows for annual adjustments to the budget and the assessments.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
17 The benefit formula used to determine the financial obligation for each parcel is based on the benefit received from improvements and services provided by each assessed parcel. One of the more common approaches to fairly distributing District costs to the benefitting parcels in maintenance districts such as this utilizes a methodology referred to as the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (“EDU”) method of apportionment. This method utilizes various property characteristics such as development status, type of development (land-use) and size (units or acreage) to compare the proportional benefit of each property compared to other properties benefitting from the improvements.

Each Zone in the District assesses developed property on the basis of acreage for the maintenance and operation of the District improvements. District costs include all incidentals and appurtenances related to the maintaining, operating or servicing the improvements described herein.

There are also certain parcels within Zone 2 that are assessed an additional amount based on linear foot (“LF”) of parcel frontage. The parcels affected in Zone 2 are assessed an additional $4.58/LF and are shown on the Assessment Roll.

The additional assessment for frontage funds the Measure J improvements installed along Monument Boulevard and Buskirk Avenue.

In November 2004, Contra Costa County voters approved Measure J. The measure provided for the continuation of the County's half-cent transportation sales tax measure for 25 more years. As with Measure C (the original 1988 transportation sales tax measure); Measure J revenues are used to fund a voter-approved Expenditure Plan of transportation programs and projects.

The total estimated cost of the improvements has been divided among the several parcels of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits received by the parcels benefiting from the improvements.

Zones 1 – 5
The method used by the engineer to apportion the costs among the benefitting properties follows:

1. Separate zones of service have been identified on the assessment diagram.

2. The estimated fiscal year operating cost within each Zone has been calculated, with incidental expenses and contingencies added to the operating costs in each Zone on a pro-rata basis.

3. The benefits received from the landscaping and lighting improvements relate to land area and to land use in equal proportion. Assessed area units were therefore, assigned to each parcel within the District as follows:
a) Improved parcels were assigned an EDU based on the improved acreage as determined by the County Assessor.
b) Vacant (unimproved) lots were assigned an EDU based on one-half the parcel acreage,reflecting the absence of user benefit.

4. The basic assessment for each parcel (exclusive of Measures C and J improvements) is calculated by multiplying the assigned EDU of the parcel by the assessment rate for each zone.

5. At the time of formation (1998), the City Council modified the Engineer’s Report prior to finalizing the formation of the District. The modifications included the following:

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
18 a) In Zone 5, parcel numbers 152-240-021 (currently 152-240-027); 153-040-047 and 153-050-054 were to be excluded from the assessment. These parcels are churches or civic organizations and at the time, these property types were typically not assessed due to the services they provided to the community in general. Parcel numbers 153-050-057 and 153-050-058 were also excluded since they are also a church (with a parking lot). b) In Zone 2, parcel number 148-042-005 (currently 148-042-009) had its assessment/EDU reduced by half to reflect the fact that it is and was a vacant parcel and serves as an open space area.

6. The Sun Valley Mall, in Zone 1, was assigned an EDU for a depth of 150 feet along its entire frontage for the special benefit received from the landscaping and lighting on Contra Costa Boulevard. This reduction reflects the fact that the Mall provides public landscaping and lighting on Willow Pass Road in Concord.

7. Parcels in Zone 1, APN’s 127-270-001 through 005, were assessed by the formation engineer according to the pro-rata share of the acreage of the parking area (parcel 005). The engineer applied the assessment rate to the area of parcel 005 and then spread the assessment back to the other four parcels based on the acreage percentage of those remaining parcels.

8. Parcel No. 127-032-042, in Zone 1, is a corner lot and fronts on Willow Pass Road. This parcel was assigned an EDU based one-half the parcel acreage, reflecting corner relief.

9. The combined total EDU for parcels 153-300-001, 002, 003 and 004 (formerly K Mart/Safeway), in Zone 1, were reduced by 4.17 acres reflecting a credit for the flowage easement over the property. In FY 19/20, there was a parcel merger and reconfiguration resulting in new parcel numbers 153-300-005, 008, 009 and 010.

10. In FY 22/23, Zone 1 had additional parcel changes resulting in 1 more parcel and 2.48 in additional acreage. This increased the total Zone 1 EDU from 136.213 to 138.352. APN’s 153-300-004 and 153- 300-010 became, 153-300-012; 153-300-013 and 153-300-014.

11. The total estimated costs in Zones 1 and 2 including incidental expense were reduced by a contribution from the General Fund. The amount of this contribution is based upon revenues collected pursuant to the former Pleasant Hill Unified Street Lighting District No. 1, respectively in each Zone.

12. Assessments in Zone 5 were calculated utilizing the amended methodology approved by the City Council on February 24, 1992, Resolution Number 12-92. Assessments in Zone 5 were reduced by a contribution from the City intended to offset the approximate cost to maintain the "pork chop" traffic islands at the intersection of Taylor Boulevard and Pleasant Hill Road. The rate of Zone 5 parcels on Taylor Boulevard, Civic Drive and Norse Drive was reduced by a factor of 0.63, reflecting the reduced maintenance costs for that area. The rate for APN’s 153-050-014, 153-050-052 (the Pleasant Hill Executive Park) and 153-050-059 (the former American States Insurance parcel) were not reduced, reflecting increased user benefit for these parcels due to additional floor space, as these parcels contain 2-story buildings. Beginning in FY 20/21, the budget for Zone 5 was split into two separate budgets (5A and 5B), to reflect the differing assessment rates described above. The total expenditures for Zone 5 are divided between 5A and 5B on a pro-rata basis, by the total EDU in each area.

Parcel areas used in this report to determine relative benefit are based upon information available with the County Assessor. All assessments have been rounded to the nearest even cent.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
19 The table below indicates the basic assessment per improved acre for each Zone. Assessments for the previous two years and the assessment per lineal foot for Measure J improvements in Zone 2 are also indicated.

Assessment Rates – Zones 1 through 5
Zone Location FY 21/22
Rate
FY 22/23
Rate
Proposed
FY 23/24
Rate
1 C.C. Blvd, Chilpancingo Pkwy, Golf Club Rd, Ellinwood Dr, Woodsworth Ln, Cleaveland Rd & Gregory Ln $1,155.60 $1,155.60 $1,155.60 2* Monument Blvd, Buskirk Ave & Lisa Ln $774.00 $774.00 $774.00 Measure J (Linear Foot) $4.58 $4.58 $4.58
3 Hookston Rd, Estland Way, Vincent Rd, Oak Park Blvd,
Buskirk Ave, Coggins Dr & N. Main St $279.27 $279.27 $279.27 4 Pleasant Hill Rd & Gregory Ln $605.00 $605.00 $605.00 5A & 5B Pleasant Hill Rd, Taylor Blvd, Morello Ave, Civic Dr, Norse Dr, Apollo Way & Devon Ave.
$821.76
$517.88
$821.76
$517.88
$821.76
$517.88
Assessment Range Formula for Zones 1 through 5
At the time of formation, the assessment levied per EDU for Zones 1 through 5 were established as shown above. There is no provision to increase the established assessment rate for these Zones. If the assessment rate in any year is proposed to exceed the established rate, the City must comply with Article XIII D, Section 4c of the California Constitution.
*During a routine parcel audit performed by Harris & Associates, the Formation Engineer’s Report for AD 20 was reviewed as a reference source. The initial assessment rate for Zone 2 was established at $774.00 when the District was formed (FY 88/89). This rate was approved by the property owner(s) at that time and was authorized by the City Council. California Government Code Section 53753 (2), (B) states that a previously approved tax, fee, assessment or charge, so long as it is not increased beyond the previously approved rate, is not considered an “increased” assessment.

Because the City Council initially authorized an assessment rate for Zone 2 of $774.00, Zone 2 was assessed at that rate again beginning in FY 21/22. The additional assessment revenue resulting from assessing the authorized rate for Zone 2 was anticipated to eliminate the Zone deficit within a period of approximately four years however, due to cost reductions in FY 21/22 in combination with the $774.00 assessment, the fund is currently balanced.

Zone 6
All of the improvements to be serviced and maintained within Zone 6 of the assessment district have been constructed for the benefit of the properties within the Zone and are of special benefit to those properties. The maintenance and servicing of the improvements enhances the quality of life on a daily basis by providing an attractive, clean, safe and secure environment in which to live and work.

Benefit Assumptions

1. Certain parcels formerly within Zone 1, and not also within Subdivision 8240 “Downtown Pleasant Hill” (Tract 8240), are specially benefitted by the landscaping and lighting improvements on Contra Costa Boulevard, Monument Boulevard, Boyd Road, North Main Street and Cleveland Road. These parcels are identified as: 1) the Terraces; 2) the Courtyard Hotel and Courtyard Shopping Center; 3) the Cal Fed

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
20 Bank Building (now Citi Bank); 4) the Wells Fargo Building; 5) the Hotel site south of Boyd Road at N.

Main Street (Hyatt House). These properties primarily benefit from the former Zone 1 benefit derived by these properties, and continues to be proportionate to those improvements (i.e. with or without the Measure C supplement). As such, these properties are assessed at the Zone 1 rate, with applicable linear footage also assessed.

2. The benefit received by parcels assessed within Tract 8240 is proportionate to the area of the parcel as it relates to the total area within Tract 8240. These lots appear on the recorded final map of Tract 8240, lots A, B, C, D, E, H, I, J and K. Parcel area, as it relates to parcel use, is an effective measurement of the special benefit received by each parcel respectively from the improvements. Parcels F and G are residential properties not included in the District.

3. The City Hall property benefits from the maintenance of landscaping and lighting improvements, particularly the maintenance of the frontage improvements on Gregory Lane, Cleaveland Road and Trelany Road. These benefits constitute special benefit and are assessable. The City however pays for the maintenance costs in lieu of paying the assessment.

4. Additionally, maintenance of the landscaping and lighting improvements at City Hall is of special benefit to the properties adjoining Tract 8240.

5. The following parcels receive no special benefit from the improvements:
a. 150-300-041 (Park at City Hall)
b. 149-110-056 (Soldiers Memorial Monument)
c. 148-020-012 (Contra Costa Boulevard)
(a and b are sources rather than recipients of benefit; c is a road right of way)

6. General Benefits are those benefits derived by property or persons outside the District. The properties on the west side of Cleaveland Road that are not in the District, benefit from the improvements on Cleaveland Road. These benefits are not assessable to parcels in Zone 6.

General Benefit

1. The City Hall frontage benefit is estimated at Zone 1 rates as shown in the table below. As previously stated, the City performs the maintenance of these improvements and is therefore not assessed.

APN Zone 1 Rate Area Amount
150-181-050 $1,155.60 3.560 $4,113.94

2. General benefit for the parcels along the west side of Cleaveland Road are estimated based upon parcel area and Zone 1 rates to be:

APN(s) Zone 1 Rate Area Amount
150-170-073 $1,155.60 0.97 $1,120.93
Bk 150 Pg 23 (Tr. 5647) $1,155.60 1.40 $1,617.84
Bk 150 Pg 25 (Tr. 235771) $1,155.60 0.83 $959.15
$3,697.92

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
21 3. The City contribution for benefits received by Parcels F and G of Tract 8240 (residential parcels) and #70 Cleaveleand Road is estimated as 50% of the Zone 6 assessment that would otherwise apply ($6,634.00 in FY 99/00 and $9,288.00 maximum).

4. The contribution from former Zone 1 General Fund is considered to offset any general benefit not linked to property on Contra Costa Boulevard and Monument Boulevard ($6,930.00).

5. The benefits received by properties in Zone 6, other than City Hall, from the maintenance of the grounds at City Hall was estimated in the initial report (August 1999) to be equal to $42,851 - $35,039 or $7,812.00. The general benefit contribution is reduced by this amount.

A summary of the Zone 6 general benefit contribution is shown on the table below:

Summary of Zone 6 General Benefit Contribution
City Hall Frontage (Zone 1 Transfer) $4,113.94
West side of Cleaveland Road $3,697.92
Parcels F & G $6,634.00
Zone 1 General Fund $6,930.00
Less Zone 6 benefit from City Hall ($7,812.00)
Total Zone General Benefit $13,563.86
Calculation of Zone 6 Assessments:

The net cost of the improvements within Zone 6 has been divided among the several parcels of land within the Zone in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by the parcels benefiting from the improvements.

The method used to calculate the assessment for each parcel follows:

1. The assessment rates per acre for the following Assessor’s Parcel Numbers are assigned at the F Y 98/99 Zone 1 rates ($1,155.60). The assessment for these parcels also includes a rate of $4.57 per linear foot of street frontage. The assessment calculation for these parcels is shown on the Assessment Roll in Appendix A. See “Benefit Assumptions”, #1.

APN Description
148-020-010 Terraces
127-110-026 Courtyard Hotel
127-110-027 Courtyard Center
150-300-015
150-210-059
Citi Bank (formerly Wells Fargo)

2. Incidental expenses include the cost of the Engineer’s Report, legal costs, advertising costs and City staff time in coordinating the annual levy process for the District.

3. The net amount to be assessed is calculated as the total Zone 6 maintenance plus incidental expenses, less the City Contributions as shown.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
22 The maximum assessment to the Tract 8240 lots in any future year subject to adjustment by the CPI will be calculated according to the method described for the FY 99/00 fiscal year substituting the amounts indicated in Part 2C of the initial report under the column entitled “Maximum Zone 6”. The maximum assessments for the Terraces and other parcels not within Tract 8240 assume a 50% increase in the maintenance effort and cost on Contra Costa and Monument Boulevards within Zone 6.

Assessment Range Formula – Zone 6
Each year, the Maximum Assessment rate shall be increased for inflation by the annual change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), during the preceding calendar year, for All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward areas, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Should the stated index be discontinued, a reasonably equivalent index should be utilized annually. The actual annual assessment rate levied in any fiscal year for Zone 6 may not exceed the established maximum allowed (adjusted by CPI) annual assessment rate for that year without receiving property owner approval for the increase. The actual assessment rate shall be as approved by the City Council, not to exceed the maximum allowed annual assessment rate for such fiscal year.

For FY 23/24, the Maximum Assessment Rate for Tract 8240 is proposed to be increased by the annual CPI of 5.59%.

This results in an assessment rate per acre of $7,545.34. The following tablestrack the Maximum Assessment (adjusted annually) as well as the Actual Assessment applied during that fiscal year.

Tract 8240 CPI History
Other Zone 6 Parcels CPI History (Acreage)
Fiscal Annual CPI Adjusted Max. Actual
Year CPI % Calculation Assessment/Acre Assessment/Acre
2019/2020 N/A N/A $6,614.00 $6,614.00
2020/2021 2.90% 1.029000001 $6,805.81 $6,805.81
2021/2022 1.72% 1.017220105 $6,923.00 $6,923.00
2022/2023 3.21% 1.032114341 $7,145.33 $7,145.33
2023/2024 5.59% 1.055982642 $7,545.34 $7,545.34
Fiscal Annual CPI CPI Change to Min. Assessment Max. Assessment Actual Year CPI % Calculation Rate/Acre Range/Acre Range/Acre Rate Applied 2019/2020 N/A N/A $1,155.60 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,155.60 2020/2021 2.9% 1.029000001 $1,189.11 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,155.60 2021/2022 1.72% 1.017220105 $1,209.59 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,155.60 2022/2023 3.21% 1.032114341 $1,248.43 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,192.71 2023/2024 5.59% 1.055982642 $1,318.32 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,259.48

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
23 Other Zone 6 Parcels CPI History (Linear Foot)
The proposed CPI increase for Tract 8240 this year, as well as the increases up to the maximum amounts for acreage and linear foot for the other Zone 6 parcels, is necessary because expenses are exceeding revenues for the Zone. If this trend continues, a Proposition 218 property owner ballot measure will be required in order to increase assessments beyond the current maximums
Operating Reserve
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by collection of assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments or to fund costs which are greater than revenue from the assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. The estimated beginning and ending Operating Reserve fund balances for FY 23/24 are shown in the Cost Estimate table.

Section 22569 (a) of the 1972 Act allows the District assessments to “…include a reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the city expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the county, whichever is later.” Capital Reserve
In addition to the Operating Reserve as detailed above, an agency may create a capital reserve to fund items that will require replacement at some point, due to limited useful life. These items may include but are not limited to the asphalt path in each subdivision, sidewalks, street trees, streetlights, etc. The estimated beginning and ending Capital Reserve fund balances for FY 23/24 are shown in the Cost Estimate table.

Any additional surplus funds, in excess of the 50% Operating Reserve or identified Capital Reserve costs, must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

Fiscal Annual CPI CPI Change to Min. Assessment Max. Assessment Actual Year CPI % Calculation Rate/Acre Range/Acre Range/Acre Rate Applied 2019/2020 N/A N/A $4.57 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86
2020/2021 2.9% 1.029000001 $4.70 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86
2021/2022 1.72% 1.017220105 $4.78 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86
2022/2023 3.21% 1.032114341 $4.94 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86
2023/2024 5.59% 1.055982642 $5.21 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
24 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel Identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be based on available parcel maps and other property data from the Contra Costa County Assessor’s office as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and adopted by the City Council.

A listing of parcels assessed within the District for FY 23/24, along with the corresponding assessment amounts, is included on the following pages. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report.

Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

Non-assessable lots or parcels include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-way, including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-way; common areas; landlocked parcels; small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed or has specific development restrictions. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore, exempted from assessment.

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
25 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
125-050-0131 0.357 0.357 $1,155.60 $412.54
125-050-0251 1.23 1.23 $1,155.60 $1,421.38
125-050-0271 0.03 0.03 $1,155.60 $34.66
125-050-0281 3.822 3.32199 $1,155.60 $3,838.90
125-250-0041 0.855 0.855 $1,155.60 $988.04
125-250-0081 0.67 0.67 $1,155.60 $774.26
125-250-0111 0.306 0.306 $1,155.60 $353.62
125-250-0121 0.627 0.627 $1,155.60 $724.56
125-250-0141 0.467 0.467 $1,155.60 $539.66
125-250-0171 0.627 0.627 $1,155.60 $724.56
125-250-0181 0.0030 $1,155.60 $0.00
125-250-0211 0.77 0.77 $1,155.60 $889.82
125-250-0231 0.67 0.67 $1,155.60 $774.26
125-250-0241 0.025 0.025 $1,155.60 $28.90
125-250-0251 0.87 0.87 $1,155.60 $1,005.38
127-032-0351 0.18 0.18 $1,155.60 $208.00
127-032-0381 0.81 0.81 $1,155.60 $936.04
127-032-0391 0.93 0.93 $1,155.60 $1,074.70
127-032-0421 0.86 0.43001 $1,155.60 $496.92
127-032-0431 0.48 0.48 $1,155.60 $554.68
127-032-0441 0.377 0.377 $1,155.60 $435.66
127-032-0451 0.55 0.55 $1,155.60 $635.58
127-032-0461 0.36 0.36 $1,155.60 $416.02
127-040-0141 0.090 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-040-0191 0.74 0.74 $1,155.60 $855.14
127-040-0201 0.967 0.967 $1,155.60 $1,117.46
127-050-0401 0.180 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-050-0521 0.589 0.589 $1,155.60 $680.64
127-050-0531 0.118 0.118 $1,155.60 $136.36
127-050-0541 0.159 0.159 $1,155.60 $183.74
127-050-0571 0.0374 0.0374 $1,155.60 $43.22
127-050-0581 0.13 0.13 $1,155.60 $150.22
127-050-0641 0.56 0.56 $1,155.60 $647.14
127-050-0651 0.29 0.29 $1,155.60 $335.12
127-050-0671 0.42 0.42 $1,155.60 $485.36
127-050-0681 0.61 0.61 $1,155.60 $704.92
127-050-0691 3.40 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-050-0701 1.343 0.4477 $1,155.60 $517.36
127-061-0261 1.49 1.49 $1,155.60 $1,721.84
127-061-0301 0.975 0.975 $1,155.60 $1,126.72
127-081-0031 0.24 0.12 $1,155.60 $138.68

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
26 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
127-081-0041 0.760 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-081-0431 0.52 0.52 $1,155.60 $600.92
127-081-0471 1.44 1.44 $1,155.60 $1,664.06
127-081-0481 1.03 1.03 $1,155.60 $1,190.26
127-081-0511 0.71 0.71 $1,155.60 $820.48
127-180-0551 2.54 2.54 $1,155.60 $2,935.22
127-180-0561 1.347 0.674 $1,155.60 $778.88
127-180-0581 1.453 1.453 $1,155.60 $1,679.08
127-210-0131 2.18 2.18 $1,155.60 $2,519.20
127-210-0141 3.880 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0221 0.250 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0271 5.090 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0311 2.43 2.43 $1,155.60 $2,808.10
127-210-0361 1.410 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0371 9.490 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0381 0.70 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-270-0011 0.228 0.711 $1,155.60 $821.64
127-270-0021 0.232 0.711 $1,155.60 $821.64
127-270-0031 0.794 2.56 $1,155.60 $2,958.34
127-270-0041 0.977 3.129 $1,155.60 $3,615.88
127-270-0051 7.1110 $1,155.60 $0.00
150-052-0091 3.616 3.616 $1,155.60 $4,178.64
150-101-0121 0.21 0.21 $1,155.60 $242.68
150-102-0121 0.2 0.2 $1,155.60 $231.12
150-102-0131 0.23 0.23 $1,155.60 $265.78
150-102-0141 0.260 $1,155.60 $0.00
150-103-0081 0.48 0.48 $1,155.60 $554.68
150-103-0131 0.16 0.16 $1,155.60 $184.90
150-103-0161 0.48 0.48 $1,155.60 $554.68
150-121-0021 0.24 0.24 $1,155.60 $277.34
150-123-0231 0.95 0.95 $1,155.60 $1,097.82
150-123-0241 0.18 0.18 $1,155.60 $208.00
150-123-0251 0.346 0.346 $1,155.60 $399.84
150-123-0271 0.33 0.33 $1,155.60 $381.34
150-123-0281 1.02 1.02 $1,155.60 $1,178.72
150-125-0111 0.168 0.168 $1,155.60 $194.14
150-150-0121 0.34 0.34 $1,155.60 $392.90
150-150-0191 0.28 0.28 $1,155.60 $323.56
150-150-0401 0.66 0.66 $1,155.60 $762.70
150-150-0551 0.2 0.2 $1,155.60 $231.12
150-150-0581 0.62 0.62 $1,155.60 $716.48

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
27 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
150-150-0661 0.428 0.428 $1,155.60 $494.60
150-150-0791 1.06 1.06 $1,155.60 $1,224.94
150-150-0801 1.431 1.431 $1,155.60 $1,653.66
150-170-0741 1.511 1.511 $1,155.60 $1,746.12
150-220-0561 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0571 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0581 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0591 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0601 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0611 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0621 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0631 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0641 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0651 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0661 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0671 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0681 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0691 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0701 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0711 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0721 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0731 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0741 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0751 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0761 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0771 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0781 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0791 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0801 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0811 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0821 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0831 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0841 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-240-0461 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0471 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0481 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0491 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0501 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0511 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0521 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0531 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
28 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
150-240-0541 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0551 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0561 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0571 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0581 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0591 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0601 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0611 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0621 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0631 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0641 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0651 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0661 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0671 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0681 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-290-0011 0.096 0.096002077 $1,155.60 $110.94
150-290-0021 0.097 0.097005884 $1,155.60 $112.10
150-290-0031 0.170 0.170006923 $1,155.60 $196.46
150-290-0041 0.205 0.205001731 $1,155.60 $236.90
150-290-0051 0.5680 $1,155.60 $0.00
153-030-0771 1.486 1.486 $1,155.60 $1,717.22
153-030-0891 0.995 0.995 $1,155.60 $1,149.82
153-030-0901 0.74 0.74 $1,155.60 $855.14
153-030-0951 2.474 2.474 $1,155.60 $2,858.96
153-030-1061 18.396 18.396 $1,155.60 $21,258.42
153-030-1071 0.771 0.771 $1,155.60 $890.96
153-081-0121 0.36 0.36 $1,155.60 $416.02
153-081-0141 0.24 0.24 $1,155.60 $277.34
153-081-0151 1.67 1.67 $1,155.60 $1,929.86
153-121-0381 2.68 2.68 $1,155.60 $3,097.00
153-134-0251 0.307 0.307 $1,155.60 $354.76
153-134-0261 0.941 0.941 $1,155.60 $1,087.42
153-222-0011 0.18 0.18 $1,155.60 $208.00
153-222-0021 0.2 0.2 $1,155.60 $231.12
153-223-0121 0.180 $1,155.60 $0.00
153-223-0161 0.18 0.18 $1,155.60 $208.00
153-223-0191 0.36 0.36 $1,155.60 $416.02
153-230-0031 0.19 0.18599862 $1,155.60 $214.94
153-230-0041 0.09 0.09300796 $1,155.60 $107.48
153-230-0051 0.93 0.92900658 $1,155.60 $1,073.56
153-230-0071 1.00 0.99899619 $1,155.60 $1,154.44

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
29 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
153-230-0211 0.30 0.3 $1,155.60 $346.68
153-230-0221 5.59 5.59200415 $1,155.60 $6,462.12
153-230-0231 0.30 0.3 $1,155.60 $346.68
153-230-0241 0.60 0.59899619 $1,155.60 $692.20
153-230-0251 2.30 2.29700588 $1,155.60 $2,654.42
153-250-0031 0.582 0.582 $1,155.60 $672.56
153-250-0041 0.554 0.554 $1,155.60 $640.20
153-250-0051 0.649 0.649 $1,155.60 $749.98
153-250-0061 0.303 0.303 $1,155.60 $350.14
153-250-0071 4.678 4.678 $1,155.60 $5,405.90
153-250-0081 0.72 0.72 $1,155.60 $832.04
153-250-0091 0.37 0.37 $1,155.60 $427.58
153-270-0011 0.37 0.37 $1,155.60 $427.58
153-270-0021 0.57 0.57 $1,155.60 $658.70
153-270-0031 0.69 0.69 $1,155.60 $797.36
153-270-0041 1.01 1.01 $1,155.60 $1,167.16
153-270-0061 0.83 0.83 $1,155.60 $959.14
153-270-0071 0.4 0.4 $1,155.60 $462.24
153-270-0101 0.625 0.625 $1,155.60 $722.26
153-270-0111 1.56 1.56 $1,155.60 $1,802.74
153-270-0131 0.72 0.72 $1,155.60 $832.04
153-270-0141 2.13 2.13 $1,155.60 $2,461.42
153-270-0151 0.29 0.29 $1,155.60 $335.12
153-300-0041 0.58 0.58 $1,155.60 $670.24
153-300-0051 1.62 0.00 $1,155.60 $0.00
153-300-0081 9.95 7.76 $1,155.60 $8,967.46
153-300-0091 2.322 $1,155.60 $2,080.08
153-300-0101 5.77 4.50 $1,155.60 $5,200.20
172.92 136.213 $157,407.84

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
30 APN Zone Acres EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/Acre
FY 23/24
Assessment
/Acre LF Rate L.F.

FY 23/24 LF
Assessment
FY 23/24
Total
Assessment
147-050-033 2 0.099 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
147-050-043 2 0.897 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
147-050-044 2 0.803 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
147-050-050 2 0.883 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-012 2 0.57 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-013 2 0.31 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-019 2 0.278 0.139 $774.00 $107.60 $107.60
148-010-020 2 0.137 0.137 $774.00 $106.04 $106.04
148-010-021 2 0.139 0.139 $774.00 $107.58 $107.58
148-010-022 2 0.34 0.34 $774.00 $263.16 $263.16
148-010-023 2 1.59 1.59 $774.00 $1,230.66 $1,230.66
148-010-024 2 0.36 0.36 $774.00 $278.64 $278.64
148-010-026 2 0.314 0.314 $774.00 $243.04 $243.04
148-010-027 2 2.68 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-028 2 0.55 0.55 $774.00 $425.70 $425.70
148-010-029 2 1 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-030 2 0.47 0.47 $774.00 $363.78 $363.78
148-031-008 2 2.167 2.167 $774.00 $1,677.26 $4.58 300.58 $1,376.66 $3,053.92 148-031-010 2 5.447 5.447 $774.00 $4,215.98 $4.58 402.93 $1,845.42 $6,061.40 148-031-011 2 0.547 0.547 $774.00 $423.38 $4.58 104.78 $479.89 $903.28 148-041-028 2 1.23 1.23 $774.00 $952.02 $4.58 95.94 $439.41 $1,391.44 148-041-029 2 1.971 1.971 $774.00 $1,525.55 $4.58 96.04 $439.86 $1,965.42 148-041-030 2 0.631 0.631 $774.00 $488.39 $4.58 138.28 $633.32 $1,121.72 148-041-035 2 0.706 0.706 $774.00 $546.44 $4.58 29.32 $134.29 $680.74 148-041-036 2 5.482 5.482 $774.00 $4,243.07 $4.58 607 $2,780.06 $7,023.14 148-041-037 2 0.254 0.254 $774.00 $196.60 $4.58 276 $1,264.08 $1,460.68 148-042-009 2 1.88 0.94 $774.00 $727.56 $4.58 447 $2,047.26 $2,774.82 148-053-013 2 0.015 0 $774.00 $0.00 2497.87 $11,440.24 $0.00 148-066-009 2 0.015 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-090-032 2 0.42 0.42 $774.00 $325.08 $325.08
148-090-033 2 0.58 0.58 $774.00 $448.92 $448.92
148-090-034 2 6.78 6.78 $774.00 $5,247.72 $5,247.72
148-090-035 2 1.78 1.78 $774.00 $1,377.72 $1,377.72
148-090-039 2 2.667 2.667 $774.00 $2,064.26 $2,064.26

41.31 35.64102 $27,586.15 $11,440.24 $39,026.46

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
31 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
148-070-0023 0.3 0.3 $279.27 $83.78
148-070-0033 0.31 0.31 $279.27 $86.58
148-070-0043 3.290 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0213 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0223 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0233 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0243 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0253 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0263 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0273 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0283 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0293 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0303 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0313 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0323 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0333 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0343 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0353 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0363 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0373 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0383 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0393 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0403 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0413 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0423 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0433 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0443 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0453 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0463 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0473 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0483 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0493 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0503 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0513 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0523 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0533 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0543 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0553 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0563 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0573 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0583 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
32 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
148-070-0593 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0603 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0613 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0623 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0633 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0643 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0653 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0663 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0673 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0683 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0693 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0073 0.40 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0153 0.236 0.236 $279.27 $65.90
148-070-0173 0.52 0.52 $279.27 $145.22
148-070-0203 1.387 1.387 $279.27 $387.34
148-090-0083 0.105 0.105 $279.27 $29.32
148-090-0283 0.89 0.89 $279.27 $248.56
148-100-0243 0.33 0.33 $279.27 $92.16
148-100-0393 1.170 $279.27 $0.00
148-100-0453 2.47 2.47 $279.27 $689.80
148-100-0563 0.0050 $279.27 $0.00
148-100-0583 3.108 3.108 $279.27 $867.98
148-100-0593 4.371 4.371 $279.27 $1,220.68
148-100-0633 0.248 0.248 $279.27 $69.26
148-100-0643 1.825 1.825 $279.27 $509.66
148-360-0083 1.12 1.12 $279.27 $312.78
148-360-0103 6.072 6.072 $279.27 $1,695.72
148-360-0243 0.750 $279.27 $0.00
148-360-0273 4.9560 $279.27 $0.00
148-360-0283 1.615 1.615 $279.27 $451.02
148-360-0303 4.013 4.013 $279.27 $1,120.72
148-360-0313 2.5470 $279.27 $0.00
148-372-0073 0.94 0.94 $279.27 $262.52
148-372-0083 14.883 14.883 $279.27 $4,156.38
148-372-0103 0.67 0.67 $279.27 $187.12
148-372-0123 1.02 1.02 $279.27 $284.86
148-372-0133 0.66 0.66 $279.27 $184.32
148-372-0143 1.04 1.04 $279.27 $290.44
148-371-0103 0.29 0.29 $279.27 $80.98
148-371-0113 0.755 0.755 $279.27 $210.84
148-371-012311 $279.27 $279.28

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
33 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
148-371-013311 $279.27 $279.28
148-371-0143 0.651 0.651 $279.27 $181.80
148-371-0153 1.748 1.748 $279.27 $488.16
148-490-0013 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0023 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0033 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0043 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0053 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0063 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0073 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0083 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0093 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0103 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0113 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0123 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0133 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0143 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0153 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0163 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0173 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0183 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0193 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0203 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0213 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0223 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0233 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0243 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0253 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-026300 $279.27 $0.00
148-490-0283 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0293 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0303 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0313 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0323 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0333 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0343 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0353 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0363 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0373 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0383 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0393 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
34 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
148-490-0403 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0413 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0423 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0433 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0443 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0453 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0463 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0473 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0483 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-049300 $279.27 $0.00
149-110-0873 0.140 $279.27 $0.00
149-122-0013 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
149-122-0023 0.039 0.039 $279.27 $10.90
149-122-0173 0.360 $279.27 $0.00
149-122-0213 0.514 0.514 $279.27 $143.54
149-122-0233 0.039 0.039 $279.27 $10.90
149-122-0243 0.5170 $279.27 $0.00
149-122-0263 1.858 1.858 $279.27 $518.88
149-122-0273 0.073 0.073 $279.27 $20.38
149-122-0283 0.293 0.293 $279.27 $81.82
149-241-0103 0.262 0.262 $279.27 $73.16
149-253-0133 0.32 0.32 $279.27 $89.36
149-253-0163 0.228 0.228 $279.27 $63.68
149-253-0283 0.22 0.22 $279.27 $61.44
149-253-0293 0.294 0.294 $279.27 $82.10
149-270-0063 0.41 0.41 $279.27 $114.50
149-270-0083 0.43 0.43 $279.27 $120.08
149-270-0363 1.50 $279.27 $0.00
149-270-0373 1.41 1.41 $279.27 $393.78
149-270-0383 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
149-270-0393 1.26 1.26 $279.27 $351.88
149-284-0053 0.21 0.21 $279.27 $58.64
149-284-0063 2.626 2.626 $279.27 $733.36
149-284-0073 0.159 0.159 $279.27 $44.40
149-284-0083 0.145 0.145 $279.27 $40.50
149-284-0123 0.277 0.277 $279.27 $77.36
170-040-0433 0.11 0.11 $279.27 $30.72
170-040-0443 0.33 0.33 $279.27 $92.16
170-040-0583 0.23 0.23 $279.27 $64.24
170-050-0013 0.31 0.31 $279.27 $86.58
170-050-0033 0.24 0.24 $279.27 $67.02

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
35 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
170-050-0263 0.590 $279.27 $0.00
170-050-0283 0.39 0.39 $279.27 $108.92
170-050-0293 0.23 0.23 $279.27 $64.24
170-050-0313 0.32 0.32 $279.27 $89.36
170-050-0323 0.740 $279.27 $0.00
170-061-0223 0.23 0.23 $279.27 $64.24
170-061-0243 0.321 0.321 $279.27 $89.64
170-091-0063 0.207 0.207 $279.27 $57.80
170-091-0073 0.207 0.207 $279.27 $57.80
170-091-0083 0.20 $279.27 $0.00
170-091-0153 0.810 $279.27 $0.00
170-091-0173 0.150 $279.27 $0.00
170-091-0183 0.20 $279.27 $0.00
170-092-0323 0.21 0.21 $279.27 $58.64
170-092-0393 0.22 0.22 $279.27 $61.44
170-092-0403 0.190 $279.27 $0.00
170-092-0413 0.11 0.11 $279.27 $30.72
170-092-0503 0.23 0.23 $279.27 $64.24
170-092-0543 0.43 0.43 $279.27 $120.08
170-092-0553 0.26 0.26 $279.27 $72.62
170-092-0573 1.040 $279.27 $0.00
170-092-0583 0.410 $279.27 $0.00
100.834 80.269 $22,417.42

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
36 APN Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
149-010-0894 0.23 0.23 $605.00 $139.16
149-010-0904 0.4 0.4 $605.00 $242.00
149-380-0014 0.181 0.181 $605.00 $109.50
149-380-0024 0.071 0.071 $605.00 $42.96
149-380-0034 0.071 0.071 $605.00 $42.96
149-380-0044 0.071 0.071 $605.00 $42.96
149-380-0054 0.123 0.123 $605.00 $74.42
149-380-0064 0.123 0.123 $605.00 $74.42
149-380-0074 0.6450 $605.00 $0.00
152-132-0464 1.23 1.23 $605.00 $744.16
152-132-0474 1.07 1.07 $605.00 $647.36
152-132-0494 1.9 1.9 $605.00 $1,149.50
152-181-0304 2.28 2.28 $605.00 $1,379.40
152-181-0484 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0494 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0504 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0514 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0524 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0534 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0544 0.820 $605.00 $0.00
164-131-0274 0.44 0.44 $605.00 $266.20
166-060-0484 0.249 0.249 $605.00 $150.64
166-081-0314 0.41 0.41 $605.00 $248.06
166-081-0514 0.35 0.35 $605.00 $211.76
166-081-0524 0.35 0.35 $605.00 $211.76

11.854 10.389 $6,285.42

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
37 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
152-023-024 5A 0.62 0.62 $821.76 $509.50
152-030-050 5A 0.33 0.00 $821.76 $0.00
152-030-051 5A 1.4 0.00 $821.76 $0.00
152-030-052 5A 2.34 0.00 $821.76 $0.00
152-040-015 5A 0.56 0.56 $821.76 $460.18
152-040-026 5A 1.84 1.84 $821.76 $1,512.04
152-040-029 5A 0.424 0.424 $821.76 $348.42
152-040-030 5A 0.438 0.438 $821.76 $359.94
152-040-031 5A 0.55 0.00 $821.76 $0.00
153-050-014 5A 3.44 3.44 $821.76 $2,826.86
153-050-052 5A 2.911 2.911 $821.76 $2,392.14
153-050-059 5A 4.505 4.505 $821.76 $3,702.02
164-242-010 5A 0.36 0.36 $821.76 $295.84
164-242-012 5A 1.92 1.92 $821.76 $1,577.78
164-242-013 5A 0.65 0.65 $821.76 $534.14
164-242-014 5A 0.502 0.502 $821.76 $412.52
164-242-015 5A 2.22 2.22 $821.76 $1,824.30

25.01 20.390 $16,755.68

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
38 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
152-240-005 5B 0.498 0.498 $517.88 $257.90
152-240-007 5B 1.15 1.15 $517.88 $595.56
152-240-014 5B 1.27 1.27 $517.88 $657.70
152-240-016 5B 0.49 0.49 $517.88 $253.76
152-240-019 5B 0.5 0.50 $517.88 $258.94
152-240-020 5B 0.49 0.49 $517.88 $253.76
152-240-024 5B 1.891 1.891 $517.88 $979.32
152-240-025 5B 2.089 2.089 $517.88 $1,081.86
152-240-026 5B 0.555 0.555 $517.88 $287.42
152-240-027 5B 2.79 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-021 5B 1.04 1.04 $821.76 $538.60
153-050-031 5B 0.5 0.50 $517.88 $258.94
153-050-036 5B 1.17 1.17 $517.88 $605.92
153-050-037 5B 0.88 0.88 $517.88 $455.74
153-050-040 5B 0.99 0.99 $517.88 $512.70
153-050-046 5B 1.42 1.42 $517.88 $735.38
153-050-048 5B 0.8 0.80 $517.88 $414.30
153-050-050 5B 1.27 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-053 5B 4.06 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-057 5B 3.632 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-058 5B 1.18 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-063 5B 1.68 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-064 5B 2.25 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-065 5B 4.17 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-066 5B 3.215 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-067 5B 2.193 2.193 $517.88 $1,135.72

42.173 17.926 $9,283.52

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
39 APN Zone Acres EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/Acre
FY 23/24
Assessment
/Acre LF Rate L.F.

FY 23/24
LF Assessment
FY 23/24
Total
Assessment
127-110-026 6 1.992 4.149 $1,259.48 $2,508.88 $6.86 546 $3,745.56 $6,254.44 127-110-027 6 6.769 9.069 $1,259.48 $8,525.42 $6.86 582 $3,992.52 $12,517.94 148-020-010 6 2.673 2.673 $1,259.48 $3,366.59 $6.86 1252 $8,591.26 $11,957.86 148-020-012 6 0.139 0 $1,259.48 $0.00 $0.00
149-110-056 6 0.25 0 $1,259.48 $0.00 $0.00
149-110-085 6 2.024 2.024 $1,259.48 $2,549.19 $2,549.18 149-110-086 6 0.868 0.868 $1,259.48 $1,093.23 $1,093.22 150-181-050 6 3.56 0 $1,259.48 $0.00 $0.00
150-210-059 6 2.33 2.33 $1,259.48 $2,934.59 $2,934.58
150-300-001 6 2.83 2.83 $7,545.34 $21,353.31 $0.00 $21,353.32 150-300-002 6 1.2 1.2 $7,545.34 $9,054.41 $0.00 $9,054.40 150-300-003 6 0.825 0.825 $7,545.34 $6,224.91 $0.00 $6,224.90 150-300-004 6 1.279 1.279 $7,545.34 $9,650.49 $0.00 $9,650.48 150-300-005 6 1.619 1.619 $7,545.34 $12,215.91 $0.00 $12,215.90 150-300-006 6 1.036 1.036 $7,545.34 $7,816.97 $0.00 $7,816.98 150-300-007 6 5.188 5.188 $7,545.34 $39,145.22 $0.00 $39,145.22 150-300-010 6 1.264 1.264 $7,545.34 $9,537.31 $0.00 $9,537.30 150-300-011 6 1.496 1.496 $7,545.34 $11,287.83 $0.00 $11,287.82 150-300-012 6 1.939 1.939 $7,545.34 $14,630.41 $0.00 $14,630.42 150-300-013 6 1.323 0 $7,545.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
150-300-014 6 0.179 0 $7,545.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
150-300-015 6 0.505 0.505 $1,259.48 $636.04 $0.00 $636.04

41.288 40.294 $162,530.71 $178,860.00

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
40 APPENDIX B – DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
41 APPENDIX C – CITY OF CONCORD PARCELS

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: AD 20 Engineer's Report 23-24 (AD 20 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 15, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 APPROVING INTENTION TO LEVY

AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS AND TO PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC
HEARING AND NOTICE IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22 FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

SYNOPSIS
An assessment district is a financial mechanism that allows for the levy of an assessment on a specific geographic area or parcels of real estate, which have been identified as receiving a direct and special "benefit" from a public improvement or service. Assessment District No. 22 (“AD 22”) enables the City to provide landscape maintenance and street lighting at an enhanced level within the scenic easements in the Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk Subdivisions. These landscape and lighting improvements are considered to be of direct benefit to the properties within AD 22’s boundaries. The funding for the maintenance and services is provided through annual assessments paid by the benefiting property owners of parcels within AD 22.

In order for the City to continue to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment District for the 2023/2024 fiscal year (FY 23/24), an Annual Report must be prepared and the City must hold a public hearing. Staff requests that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments within AD 22 for FY 23/24 and give notice of the time and place for a public hearing on the levy of the assessments.

DISCUSSION
Background
AD 22 (Grayson Woods) was formed in 1997 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 of the California Streets and Highways Code. AD 22 was amended in 2002 to include Subdivision 8304, Gallery Walk.

In order for the City to continue to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment District for FY 23/24, the City Council adopted a resolution directing the Engineer of Work to prepare an annual report at its February 6, 2023 meeting. The Engineer of Work, Harris & Associates, has completed and filed the annual report (attached) for FY 23/24 with the City Clerk. The Annual

9.6 Packet Pg. 134
Report includes descriptions of the improvements proposed during the fiscal year, an estimate of costs, and the levy of assessments upon the benefiting properties.

There are no new services or substantial changes in existing services proposed for FY 23/24 in the Gallery Walk subdivision. The Gallery Walk subdivision has sufficient capital set-aside funds for a future capital project; therefore, staff is recommending that the assessment rate remain at $187.50 for FY23/24, a rate that ensures the capital set-aside fund remains healthy.

The Reliez Valley slope stabilization project scheduled for completion in the current fiscal year will deplete the capital set-aside in the fund for Grayson Woods. Staff therefore recommends an increase in the assessment rate for Grayson Woods of 5.598% (the percentage of the annual change in the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco/Oakland/Hayward Area (“CPI”)), above the FY 22/23 rate. This increase of $17.90 from $319.84 to $337.74 per parcel will help address increasing labor and utilities costs. This new rate is $21.26 below the Maximum Assessment rate of $359.00 for Grayson Woods.

A resolution of intention to collect assessments for FY 23/24 and call for a public hearing is attached.

Analysis
The collecting of assessments from properties within the boundaries of AD 22, together with the funds provided by the City, will ensure continued maintenance of lighting and landscape improvements within the boundaries of the District. City Maintenance staff provides for the maintenance of the improvements. The maintenance activities include weekly mowing and edging of turf; maintenance and repair of irrigation systems; pruning; debris removal; graffiti removal; streetlight repair; maintenance; and weeding, as well as paying for utility charges for water and electricity.

If AD 22 assessments are confirmed for FY 23/24, staff will continue to provide maintenance services for Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk. If approved, the assessment revenues for this year will total $61,583, and include the assessment adjustments mentioned above. Staff and the Engineer of Work are making every effort to control expenditures related to managing, maintaining, and servicing AD 22 landscape and lighting improvements.

The estimated cost for the preparation and filing of the annual report is not to exceed $14,767, a cost borne by the District and divided proportionately between Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Pleasant Hill contributes a percentage of funding each year from the General Fund toward landscape and lighting costs for both development areas. This contribution is intended to offset the portion of the landscape and lighting improvements that provide benefit to the general public in areas located adjacent to public roadways within the City’s right of way. The proposed General Fund contribution for FY 23/24 is $8,493 ($2,437 for Grayson Woods and $6,056 for Gallery Walk).

9.6 Packet Pg. 135

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page. The Resolution of Intention will be published in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with the statutes not less than ten days prior to the public hearing.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt the Resolution of Intention.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Should AD 22 not be confirmed for FY 23/24, there would be a loss of $61,583 in assessment revenues to fund maintenance activities within AD 22. The City would need to fund these maintenance activities or services would need to be suspended or substantially reduced.

ATTACHMENTS:

Proposed Resolution
AD 22 Engineer’s Report
Prepared by: Danielle K. Navarro, Principal Management Analyst/City Clerk Reviewed by: Ann James, Public Works Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

9.6 Packet Pg. 136
RESOLUTION NO. ___-23

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT

HILL TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS, LEVY ASSESSMENTS, AND PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22 FOR THE 2023/2024 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2023, the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill adopted Resolution No. 7-23, a Resolution directing preparation and filing of the 2023/2024 Annual Engineer’s Report for maintenance of Assessment District No. 22 (AD 22); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 7-23, the City directed Harris & Associates, as Engineer of Work for AD 22, to prepare a report in accordance with Sections 22565 et seq., of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Report"); and WHEREAS, the Report has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within AD 22 for fiscal year 2023/2024 (“FY 23/24”) in order to accomplish the installation, service, and maintenance of public landscape and street lighting as described in Exhibit A which is incorporated by this reference and made a part of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the individual assessments for FY 23/24 are not proposed to exceed the maximum assessment rate for AD 22; and
WHEREAS, the proposed assessments will be imposed exclusively to finance the operation and maintenance costs of lighting and landscape improvements within and immediately adjacent to AD 22; and
WHEREAS, the district consists of the lots and parcels shown on the assessment diagram of AD 22 on file with the City Clerk of the City, and reference is hereby made to such diagram for further particulars; and
WHEREAS, reference is hereby made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of AD 22, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within AD 22.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that:

1. The Report is hereby deemed sufficient and preliminarily approved and the Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to this resolution.

9.6.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24)

2. It is the intent of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within AD 22 to accomplish the installation, service, and maintenance of public landscape and street lighting as described in Exhibit A.

3. Notice is hereby given that on June 5, 2023, at 7:00 p.m., the City Council will hold a public hearing during its regular meeting on the question of the ordering of the proposed improvements and the levying of the proposed assessments for the 2023/2024 fiscal year. The public hearing will be held both in person at City Hall at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, California and on Zoom (login details will be posted on the agenda). Prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any interested person may be afforded the opportunity to “hear and be heard” or may file a written protest with the City Clerk, or having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. A protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such owner.

4. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the public hearing by publishing in accordance with Section 6061 of the Government Code.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 15
th day of May 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

9.6.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24)

EXHIBIT A
TO

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PLEASANT HILL TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS, LEVY ASSESSMENTS

AND PROVIDE FOR HEARING AND NOTICE

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
Grayson Woods
The improvements consist of the maintenance, servicing of landscaping and street lighting on public streets, easements, and right of ways immediately adjacent to and within the Grayson Woods subdivision, including, but not limited to, trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, turf, and asphalt pathways. The services provided include, but are not limited to, litter and debris removal, irrigation system adjustment, maintenance and repairs, pruning, staking, fertilizing, plant replacement and restoration, weed and rodent control, erosion control, trimming of vegetation, and removal of debris in creek areas.

Gallery Walk
The improvements consist of the maintenance and servicing of the existing landscaping, including, but not limited to trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, turf, concrete sidewalks, and asphalt pathways; and street lighting on public streets, easements, and right of ways immediately adjacent to the subdivision. The landscaping services provided include, but are not limited to, litter and debris removal; irrigation system adjustment, maintenance and repairs; pruning, staking, fertilizing, plant replacement and restoration; weed control; erosion control; and trimming of vegetation.

No additional improvements are planned.

9.6.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24)

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22
MAY 2023

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500
Concord, CA 94520
www.weareharris.com

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER….……………………………………………………………..i PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS……………………………………………………………………..1 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COSTS………………………………………………………………………………….3 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM…………………………………………………………………………….6 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT………………………………………………………………...7 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL…………………………………………………………………………..13 APPENDIX B – DISTRICT DIAGRAM………….……………………………………………………………...21

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
i

STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
AGENCY: CITY OF PLEASANT HILL
PROJECT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for Assessment District No. 22 (“District”) of the City of Pleasant Hill, to provide landscaping and lighting services upon each lot or parcel of land in the District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 (“FY 23/24”).

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Pleasant Hill’s Resolution being adopted by the City Council for the:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART 1
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City and are hereby made a part of this Report by reference.

PART 2
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for FY 23/24.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
ii
PART 3
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District and any Zones. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the office of the City Clerk.

PART 4
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received.

The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established at the time of formation.

Appendices
Appendix A – Assessment Roll
Appendix B – District Diagram
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of , 2023
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
1 PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The boundaries of Assessment District No. 22 correspond to the boundaries of the tracts of land identified on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report. The tracts include the Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk subdivisions within the City of Pleasant Hill.

A copy of the Assessment Diagram is on file with the City Clerk. The Assessment Diagram refers to the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for an exact description of the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District. Each parcel on the Assessment Diagram is keyed to the assessment, which appears in the Assessment Roll, by its Assessor’s Parcel Number.

The Assessment District consists of two subdivisions containing 237 assessable single-family residential lots and an assessable golf course and clubhouse parcel. There are also several non-assessable parcels including open space, scenic easements, public streets and rights of ways. In total there are 248 assessor’s parcels within the District Boundaries.

Improvements and Services Provided
The following are the specific improvements maintained and serviced within the District:

Grayson Woods
The subdivision contains 104 residential lots and a golf course and clubhouse. The improvements consist of the maintenance, servicing of landscaping and street lighting on public streets, easements, and right of ways immediately adjacent to and within the Grayson Woods subdivision. The improvements being maintained consist of public street lighting systems and public landscaping including, but not limited to, trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, turf, and asphalt pathways. The services provided include, but are not limited to, litter and debris removal, irrigation system adjustment, maintenance and repairs, pruning, staking, fertilizing, plant replacement and restoration, weed and rodent control, erosion control, trimming of vegetation, and removal of debris in creek areas.

There are approximately 69,000 square feet of landscaped area within the Grayson Woods development. There is approximately 1,000 square feet of turf area and several hundred square feet of raised annual color beds included in the in the landscaping, which are changed two to three times annually.

The small creek along the west side of Reliez Valley Road empties into a 48 inch pipe with a trash rack on the east side of Reliez Valley Road, which needs to be cleared from landscaping debris as necessary. Vegetation in a creek running through the landscaped easement must be pruned and cleaned, and periodic slope stabilization is provided as necessary to ensure proper drainage. Maintenance of public open space parcels F, H and I is also provided by the District.

In addition to the landscaping improvements, there are 30 total streetlights to be serviced and maintained: six on Reliez Valley Road, five on Grayson Road, eight on Iron Hill Street and eleven on Golf Links Street and adjoining cul-de-sacs.

The County services and maintains the streetlights on Reliez Valley Road, and this cost has been excluded from the District. Plans and specifications for the service and maintenance of streetlights are published by PG&E and are incorporated into this Report by reference.

The District also repairs or resurfaces the asphalt path along Reliez Valley Road. Maintenance of the public open space within the development may also be provided under the District but has been budgeted on an as-needed basis.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
2 There are no substantial changes or additions to the improvements or services proposed for FY 23/24.

Gallery Walk
The subdivision contains 133 residential lots. These parcels of land were annexed into the existing assessment district in 2002 and are shown on the diagramfound in Appendix B. There is also a separate budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements for the Gallery Walk development.

Areas beingmaintained lie within the public right of way, generally located along West Hookston Road, Cleaveland Road, Astrid Drive and within the East Bay Municipal Utility District (“EBMUD”) right of way. The improvements consist of the maintenance and servicing of the existing landscaping, including, but not limited to trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, turf, concrete sidewalks, and asphalt pathways; and street lighting on public streets, easements, and right of ways immediately adjacent to the subdivision. The landscaping services provided include, but are not limited to litter and debris removal; irrigation system adjustment, maintenance and repairs; pruning, staking, fertilizing, plant replacement and restoration; weed control; erosion control; and trimming of vegetation.

The services in the public right of way adjacent to West Hookston Road, Cleaveland Road, and Astrid Drive are limited to street lighting. The maintenance of ground cover, turf, irrigation, and litter and debris removal in these areas is not the responsibility of the District but is provided by the individual property owner or the Homeowner’s Association.

There will be an occasional need to repair or replace the concrete sidewalks along the exterior of the tract. Reserve funds will be used for that purpose when required and may also be used to resurface the asphalt path along the EBMUD trail in the future, as well as other repairs or replacements as needed.

There are no substantial changes or additions to the improvements or services proposed for FY 23/24. The Budget however, includes $1,600 for bench replacements. The benches have been weathered and rusted out by the elements, and are no longer safe.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
3 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COST
The estimated budget for the annual maintenance and servicing of the improvements and the proportionate share of administration costs for the District has been prepared based on the estimated and historical costs to provide said maintenance and services. Individual budgets for Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk are shown on the following pages.

The proposed costs represent the estimated costs required to maintain the improvements at the level expected by property owners and the City, and includes contributions from the City to account for the general benefit conferred to parcels outside the District.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
4 GRAYSON WOODS
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 10,372 $ 8,062 $ 5,933
Interest $ 331 $ 340 $ 351
Assessments $ 36,645 $ 37,744 $ 38,876
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 2,437 $ 2,510 $ 2,585 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 39,412 $ 40,594 $ 41,812

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 1,399 $ 1,441 $ 1,485
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 14,913 $ 15,360 $ 15,821 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 6,634 $ 6,700 $ 6,767 C/S Professional (3) $ - $ - $ -
C/S Construction $ - $ - $ -
Sidewalk/Pathways Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 3,837 $ 3,952 $ 4,071
Utilities - Water $ 9,632 $ 9,920 $ 10,218
Utilities - Other $ 1,432 $ 1,475 $ 1,519
Advertising $ 250 $ 250 $ 250
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (4) $ 214 $ 214 $ 214 Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment (5) $ 3,410 $ 3,410 $ 3,410 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 41,721 $ 42,724 $ 43,755

RESERVE BALANCE
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 20,861 $ 21,362 $ 21,877.70 Operating Reserve Fund Adjustments $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 20,861 $ 21,362 $ 21,878 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ (10,489) $ (13,299) $ (15,945) Capital Reserve Fund Adjustments $ (2,309) $ (2,129) $ (1,943) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ (12,798) $ (15,429) $ (17,888) Total Reserve Balance $ 8,062 $ 5,933 $ 3,990
Assessable EDU's - Single Family Parcels 104.00 104.00 104.00 Assessable EDU's - Golf Course Clubhouse & Remainder 4.50 4.50 4.50 Total EDU 108.50 108.50 108.50
Actual/Proposed Assessment (6) $ 337.74 $ 347.87 $ 358.31 Maximum Allowable Assessment (7) $ 359.00 $ 359.00 $ 359.00 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years assumes a 1% escalator. 3 Consulting Services related to professional service and construction contract costs. 4 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 5
$1,000 is being budgeted for a dog waste bag station. 6 Actual Assessment are proposed to increase as shown to replenish Reserves. 7 Maximum Assessment was established in an amount not to exceed $359.00.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
5 GALLERY WALK
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 49,106 $ 47,125 $ 47,343
$ - $ -
Interest $ 450 $ 450 $ 450
Assessments $ 24,938 $ 24,938 $ 24,938
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 6,056 $ 6,238 $ 6,425 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 31,443 $ 31,625 $ 31,812

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 1,399 $ 1,441 $ 1,485
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 15,106 $ 15,559 $ 16,026 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 8,132 $ 8,213 $ 8,296 C/S Professional (3) $ - $ - $ -
C/S Construction (3) $ - $ - $ -
Sidewalk/Pathways Maintenance $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Water (4) $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Other $ 198 $ 204 $ 210
Advertising $ 250 $ 250 $ 250
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (5) $ 238 $ 238 $ 238 Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment (6) $ 3,100 $ 500 $ 500 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 33,424 $ 31,406 $ 32,005

RESERVE BALANCES
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 16,712 $ 15,703 $ 16,002 Operating Reserve Fund Adjustments $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 16,712 $ 15,703 $ 16,002 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 32,394 $ 31,422 $ 31,341 Capital Reserve Fund Adjustments $ (1,981) $ 218 $ (193) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 30,413 $ 31,640 $ 31,148 Total Reserve Balance: $ 47,125 $ 47,343 $ 47,151
Assessable EDU's - Single Family Parcels 133.00 133.00 133.00 Total EDU 133.00 133.00 133.00
Actual/Proposed Assessment $ 187.50 $ 187.50 $ 187.50
Maximum Allowable Assessment (7) $ 234.36 $ 234.36 $ 234.36 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years assumes a 1% escalator. 3 Consulting Services related to professional service and construction contract costs. 4 Water supplied by development. 5 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 6
$1,600 is being budgeted for bench replacements as they have reached the end of their useful life. 6 An additional $1,000 is being budgeted for a dog waste bag station. 7 Maximum Assessment was established in an amount not to exceed $234.36.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
6 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of each Zone and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District has been submitted to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Pleasant Hill, and is hereby made a part of this Report by reference.

A copy of the Assessment Diagram is included as Appendix B of this Report.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
7 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
General
Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
— Streets and Highways Code Section 22573
The 1972 Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will received different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In November 1996, the voters of California adopted Proposition 218, which has been codified as Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. Proposition 218 imposed a number of substantive and procedural requirements on taxes, assessments, and property-related fees imposed by local governments in California.

The method of apportionment described in this Report, and confirmed by the City Council, utilizes commonly accepted engineering practices established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the California Constitution for the allocation of special benefit assessments. The calculation of assessments is based upon the parcel type and the services and improvements provided to equitably apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each lot or parcel. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is over and above any general benefit conferred upon said lots or parcels or to the public at large.

Special Benefit
The improvements and associated costs have been allocated to the assessable properties within the District based upon the special benefit received by those properties. The improvements for which the properties are assessed have been identified as necessary, were installed and are being maintained as part of the development plans. As such, the improvements and continuing maintenance and servicing of those improvements are the obligation of the properties within the District.

General Benefit
The landscaping and hardscape improvements that are unique to each neighborhood in the District (Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk), with regards to the specific plant materials, style and intensity of landscaping and hardscape within the community, provide a special benefit to property owners within those neighborhoods by providing visual interest, a sense of identity and community and definition that is unique to each neighborhood. Landscaping is also used to provide neighborhood traffic calming and provide informal gathering places.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
8 As a result, the landscaping helps to define the character of each neighborhood, setting it apart from other areas within the City. The landscaping improvements provide particular aesthetics and community identity to the neighborhoods.

Those landscaping improvements were installed and are maintained as a condition of development and would not have been installed otherwise.

Assessments may only be levied upon parcels in proportion to the proportional special benefit received by a parcel per Article XIII D of the State Constitution (“Proposition 218”). Special benefit means a particular and district benefit that is over and above any general benefit conferred on parcels located in the district or to the public at large. Further, no assessment may exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional benefit conferred upon a parcel. Based upon this, it is necessary to calculate the cost related to any general benefit, and that amount must be subtracted from the assessment to be levied upon the parcels in the District. The improvements maintained by the assessment, which are described in the plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer, confer special benefits that affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effects on other parcels not within the District, and which real property in general and the public at large do not share since the improvements were provided for the sole benefit of the parcels within the district and were required as a condition of development.

However, even though the improvements were installed for the sole benefit of the parcels within each area, it has been determined that there is an incidental General Benefit from the maintenance of trees, landscaping improvements, hardscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities located near the parcels within each neighborhood. This benefit is considered incidental and provides a small amount of benefit to motorists traveling to or from the neighborhood, or to properties outside the District. As a result, the City has quantified this General Benefit as described below in order to subtract it from the special benefit and will make an annual contribution for the incidental general benefits conferred to those outside properties or individuals.

For Grayson Woods, the landscaping along the east side of Reliez Valley Road and the north side of Grayson Road may confer some limited benefit to passersby or parcels outside the District.

For purposes of calculating a percentage for general benefit, the square footage of landscaping being maintained was divided by the annual labor costs (Salaries & Benefits on Budget page) to maintain that landscaping, using FY 20/21 dollars. Labor costs in FY 20/21 were $10,543. There is approximately 69,000 SF of landscaping being maintained ($10,543/69,000 = $0.153/SF). For areas in the City with no landscaping improvements to be maintained, the City provides limited weed control and debris removal as necessary. The average cost per square foot for those services is approximately $0.025. The percentage difference between $0.153 and $0.025 is equal to 16.34%. The City therefore, will make a contribution equal to 16.34% of the annual labor costs of the Grayson Woods area to offset any general benefit.

For Gallery Walk, the landscaping along the EBMUD easement, as well as the south side of Hookston Road and the east side of Cleveland Road confers some level of benefit to individuals outside the District.

The costs per square foot to maintain the landscaping improvements within Gallery Walk is also $0.153/SF (Using FY 20/21 Labor Costs of $7,406 / 48,500 SF maintained = $0.153/SF). Due to the nature and location of the landscaping in Gallery Walk, and the fact that approximately 40% of the total area being maintained is located within the EBMUD easement, which is readily accessible to the general public, it has been determined that 80% of the landscaping within the EBMUD easement should be considered general benefit. The remaining 20% of the landscaping provides direct and special benefit to the parcels in Gallery Walk. That 20% includes the landscaping along the west side of the development, as well as the asphalt pathway, which provides direct access to the EBMUD easement. Taking into account the areas defined as general benefit vs. special benefit and spreading the costs proportionally, the City will make a contribution equal to 40.09% of the annual labor costs of the Grayson Woods area to offset any general benefit. See next page for calculation details.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
9 EBMUD Easement:
40% of 48,500 total SF of landscaping = 19,400 SF at $0.153/SF = $2,968.20. 20% of that amount is 3,880 SF. 19,400 SF – 3,880 SF = 15, 520 SF at $0.153/SF = $2,374.56 applied to general benefit. The remaining amount of $659.60 is assessable to the District properties as special benefit.

Remainder of Gallery Walk:
60% of 48,500 total SF of landscaping = 29,100 SF at $0.153 = $4,452.30, reduced by 14.70% = $654.49 additional to general benefit. The remaining amount of $3,797.81 is assessable to the District properties as special benefit.

Total to General Benefit: $3,029.05
Total Salaries & Benefits: $7,406.00 (FY 20/21 dollars) $3,029.05/$7,406.00 = 40.09%
Definition of Special Benefit
The method of apportionment described in this Report is based on the premise that each assessable parcel or unit receives distinct and special benefits from the improvements and services provided, including the visual desirability provided by well-maintained landscaping and lighting. In accordance with Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution:
“Special benefit means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or the public at large” The special benefits associated with local landscaping and lighting improvements are specifically:
 Enhanced desirability of properties due to proximity and accessibility of the improvements.  Improved aesthetic appeal provided by a positive representation of the development, neighborhood and the community.
 Improved ingress and egress to property resulting in enhanced traffic flow, reduced traffic accidents and consequent reduction of possible property damage.
 Improved traffic visibility and circulation.
 Improved accessibility for emergency vehicles.
 Reduced vandalism and other criminal activity.

ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
To impose a new assessment or increased assessment in excess of the Maximum Assessment Rate for the current fiscal year, the City must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4c that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owners must approve the proposed new or increased assessment via a property owner protest balloting process before any such new or increased assessment can be imposed. A protest occurs when, at the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots opposed to the new or increased assessment outweigh the returned ballots in favor of the new or increased assessment, weighting those assessment ballots by the financial obligation of each parcel.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
10 The definition of new or increased assessments includes any assessment which, 1) did not previously exist or, 2) exceeds a previously approved assessment amount or assessment range formula. Any assessment range formula must have been previously adopted by the agency and approved by the property owners.

Assessment Methodology
It is generally recognized that most budgetary items will be impacted by inflation in future years. In accordance with the California Constitution, Section 53739 (b)(1), assessments “may be adjusted for inflation pursuant to a clearly defined formula…” A formula for an inflationary adjustment is therefore included as part of the maximum assessment for this District and was approved by the property owner(s) at the time of formation. The formula, as described below, allows for annual adjustments to the budget and the assessments.

The benefit formula used to determine the financial obligation for each parcel is based on the improvements benefitting the parcels, as well as the use, or type, of each parcel that benefits from said improvements. One of the more common approaches to fairly distributing District costs to the benefitting parcels in maintenance districts such as this utilizes a methodology referred to as the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (“EDU”) method of apportionment. This method utilizes various property characteristics such as development status, type of development (land-use) and size (units or acreage) to compare the proportional benefit of each property compared to other properties benefitting from the improvements. The parcel types and corresponding benefit within the District follow:

Grayson Woods
Residential parcels
The maintenance of landscaping along Reliez Valley Road and Grayson Road is of special benefit to all residential properties within the Grayson Woods development in that it enhances the appearance of the development and improves the quality of life within the development on a day to day basis. The cleaning and removal of debris from drainage ditches assures that drainage from upstream properties may pass freely through the development. All properties must access the property via Reliez Valley Road or Grayson Road and the benefit to each single-family residential parcel is presumed to be the same, regardless of location within the development. As a result, each singlefamily residential parcel is assigned an EDU of 1.00.

Golf Course Clubhouse/Restaurant and Parking
The benefit received by the golf course clubhouse/restaurant and parking area from street lighting may be evaluated in terms of the benefit received by a single-family residence. The clubhouse benefits the same from vehicle and pedestrian safety as well as from enhanced property appearance and security. The clubhouse parking lot frontage is roughly equivalent to that for four average residential lots and its street lighting benefit is accordingly assigned 4.00 EDU.

Remainder of Golf Course
The remainder of the golf course parcel receives limited special benefit from street lighting. That portion of the fairway which fronts on a lighted street benefits from the safety and security provided to pedestrians and motorists.

Assuming a typical lot has a frontage of 50 feet, an equivalent number of units of street lighting benefit for the golf course fairway may be calculated by dividing that portion of the parcel by 50, resulting in an additional 0.50 EDU.

Open Space and Scenic Easements
These parcels do not have lighted frontage, do not benefit from street lighting, and therefore are not assessed

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
11 As described above, equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) have been assigned to each assessor’s parcel number (APN) by land use. They are listed in following table:

Grayson Woods
EDUs by Land Use
Parcel Type
Parcel
Count
EDU per Parcel
Type Total EDU’s
Single Family Residential 104 1.00 104.00
Golf Course & Clubhouse 2 4.50 4.50
Open Space (Lots F, H & I) 4 0.00 0.00
Totals: 110 108.50
At the time of formation, the assessment levied per EDU was established to fall within a range of $289.00 to $359.00, with the exact amount to be levied in any given year to be determined by the budget for that year. The actual assessment each year may be increased the following year by the percentage of the annual change in the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco/Oakland/Hayward Area (CPI), so long as the resulting increase does not exceed $359.00, as established. If the assessment in any year is proposed to exceed $359.00, the City must comply with Article XIII D, Section 4c of the California Constitution, as previously stated. The annual percentage change for 2022 (January 2023), was 5.598%. The assessments for FY 23/24 are proposed to increase to $337.74 ($319.84 X

1.055982642 = $337.74) as shown on the budget page.

Gallery Walk
The Gallery Walk area consists of single-family residential parcels only.

The net total amount to be assessed has been distributed among the various parcels of land within the Gallery Walk Annexation in accordance with the estimated special benefits to be received by each parcel from the improvements.

Each residential lot is assigned an equal dwelling unit, “EDU.” The assessment per EDU is calculated as the total estimated cost less the general benefit contribution by the City is shown in the Cost Estimate table, divided by the total EDUs in Gallery Walk.

Gallery Walk
EDUs by Land Use
Parcel Type Parcel Count
EDU per Parcel
Type Total EDUs
Single Family Residential 133 1.00 133.00
Totals: 133 133.00
At the time of annexation, the assessment levied per EDU was established to fall within a range of $187.49 to $234.36, with the exact amount to be levied in any given year to be determined by the budget for that year. The actual assessment each year may be increased the following year by the percentage of the annual change in the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco/Oakland/Hayward Area (CPI), so long as the resulting increase does not exceed $234.36, as established.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
12 If the assessment in any year is proposed to exceed $234.36, the City must comply with Article XIII D, Section 4c of the California Constitution, as previously stated. The annual percentage change for 2022 (January 2023), was 5.598%. The assessments for FY 23/24 are not proposed to increase from the previous year.

Operating Reserve
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Assessment funds shall be used only for the purposes stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments or to fund costs which are greater than revenue from the assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. The estimated beginning and ending Operating Reserve fund balances for FY 22/23 are shown in the Cost Estimate table.

Section 22569 (a) of the 1972 Act allows the District assessments to “…include a reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the city expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the county, whichever is later.” Capital Reserve
In addition to the 50% Operating Reserve detailed above, an agency may create an additional reserve (“Capital” or “Replacement” Reserve) to fund the replacement of improvement items that useful life exceeding five years. These items may include but are not limited to the asphalt path in each subdivision, sidewalks, streetlights, irrigation systems, etc. The estimated beginning and ending Capital Reserve fund balances for FY 23/24 are shown in the Cost Estimate table.

Any additionalsurplus funds, in excess of the 50% Operating Reserve or identified Capital Reserve, must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
13 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel Identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be based on available parcel maps and other property data from the Contra Costa County Assessor’s office as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and adopted by the City Council.

A listing of parcels assessed within the District for FY 23/24, along with the corresponding assessment amounts, is included on the following pages. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report.

Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

Non-assessable lots or parcels include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-way, including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-way; common areas; landlocked parcels; small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots and any other property that cannot be developed or has specific development restrictions. These types of parcels receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore, exempted from assessment.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
14 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
164-040-037 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-040-039 Grayson Woods $1,439.28
164-550-001 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-002 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-003 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-004 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-005 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-006 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-007 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-008 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-009 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-010 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-011 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-012 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-013 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-014 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-015 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-016 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-017 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-018 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-019 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-020 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-021 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-022 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-023 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-024 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-025 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-026 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-027 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-028 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-029 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-030 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-031 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-032 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-033 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-034 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-035 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-036 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-037 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-038 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-039 Grayson Woods $337.74

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
15 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
164-550-040 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-041 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-043 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-044 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-045 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-046 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-047 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-048 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-049 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-050 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-051 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-052 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-053 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-054 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-055 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-056 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-057 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-058 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-059 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-063 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-550-064 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-550-066 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-001 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-002 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-003 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-004 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-005 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-006 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-007 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-008 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-009 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-010 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-014 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-015 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-016 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-017 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-018 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-019 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-020 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-021 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-022 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-023 Grayson Woods $337.74

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
16 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
164-560-024 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-025 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-026 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-027 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-028 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-029 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-030 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-031 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-032 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-033 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-034 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-035 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-036 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-037 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-038 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-039 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-040 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-041 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-042 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-046 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-560-047 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-560-048 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-560-049 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-560-051 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-052 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-053 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-055 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-056 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-057 Grayson Woods $337.74
$36,644.80

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
17 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
149-121-043 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-044 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-045 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-046 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-047 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-048 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-049 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-050 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-051 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-052 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-053 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-054 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-055 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-056 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-057 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-058 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-059 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-060 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-061 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-062 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-063 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-064 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-065 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-066 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-067 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-068 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-069 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-070 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-071 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-072 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-073 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-074 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-075 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-076 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-077 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-078 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-079 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-080 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-081 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-082 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-083 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-084 Gallery Walk $187.50

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
18 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
149-121-085 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-086 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-087 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-088 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-089 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-090 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-091 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-092 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-093 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-094 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-095 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-096 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-097 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-098 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-099 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-100 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-101 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-102 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-103 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-104 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-105 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-106 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-107 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-108 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-109 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-110 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-111 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-112 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-113 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-114 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-115 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-116 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-117 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-118 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-119 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-120 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-121 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-122 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-123 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-124 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-125 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-126 Gallery Walk $187.50

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
19 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
149-121-127 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-128 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-129 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-130 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-131 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-132 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-133 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-134 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-135 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-136 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-137 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-138 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-139 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-140 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-141 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-142 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-143 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-144 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-145 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-146 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-147 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-148 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-149 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-150 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-151 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-152 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-153 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-154 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-155 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-156 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-157 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-158 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-159 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-160 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-161 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-162 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-163 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-164 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-165 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-166 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-167 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-168 Gallery Walk $187.50

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
20 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
149-121-169 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-170 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-171 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-172 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-173 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-174 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-175 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-176 Gallery Walk $0.00
149-121-177 Gallery Walk $0.00
149-121-178 Gallery Walk $0.00 $24,937.50

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
21 APPENDIX B – DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages show the Assessment Diagram or boundary map for each Zone. The lines and dimensions shown on maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the current year, are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
22 9.6.b
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
23 9.6.b
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: AD 22 Engineer's Report (AD 22 - Intention to Levy & Collect Assessments FY 23/24) 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3323 – (925) 671-5270 www.pleasanthillca.org

MEMORANDUM
TO: City Councilmembers
FROM: Interview and Nominating Committee
Mayor Tim Flaherty, Councilmember Allen Vinson
DATE: May 15, 2023
SUBJECT: Approve Appointment Recommendations to the Civic Action Commission and Contra Costa Transportation Authority Advisory Committee The Interview and Nominating Committee recommends the following appointments and requests the City Council’s confirmation:

APPOINTMENTS TERMS/EXPIRATION DATES
Civic Action Commission
David Chung Unfilled term through February 2024
Hunter Roberts Term through February 2027
Anthony Garcia (reappointed 5/1/23) Term correction through February 2027 Contra Costa Transportation Authority
Advisory Committee
Bill Bankert (reappointment) May 2023 through April 2025

9.7 Packet Pg. 167

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 15, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO NOTIFY THE PLEASANT HILL CHAMBER OF

COMMERCE THAT THEY ARE RELEASED FROM THE

REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT AND SUBMIT TO THE CITY A

FINANCIAL AUDIT OF THE PLEASANT HILL TOURISM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2021 TO
MARCH 30, 2022

SYNOPSIS
Section 14 of the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District (PHTID) Owners’ Association Agreement with the City requires an annual fiscal audit. Adopting the attached resolution releases the Chamber from conducting a fiscal audit covering the final nine months of their term as the PHTID management term.

DISCUSSION
The City Council approved the formation of the PHTID in 2017 and designated the Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) as the PHTID Owners’ Association beginning on April 1, 2017 and ending on March 31, 2022. The 2020 First Amendment to the PHTID Owners’ Association Agreement changed the time frame of the required annual fiscal audit from April 1 – March 31 to July 1 – June 30. Because the term of the Agreement ended on March 31, 2022, the Chamber’s final audited financial statement would cover a nine-month period (July 1, 2021 – March 31, 2022) instead of a twelve-month period. Stay Pleasant Hill became the new PHTID Owners’ Association on April 1, 2022.

The Chamber notified City staff on October 3, 2022 that the Chamber is not planning to complete a fiscal audit covering the final nine months of the Agreement. On February 22, 2023, the Budget Committee noted that neither the PHTID Agreement nor the First Amendment to the PHTID Agreement includes language addressing an audit period that does not fall on a 12-month schedule, and recommended that the full Council release the Chamber from completing and submitting a fiscal audit covering the final nine months of their PHTID management term (July 1, 2021 – March 30, 2022).

9.8 Packet Pg. 168

FISCAL IMPACT
No direct fiscal impact to the City has been identified.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt the proposed Resolution authorizing the City Manager to notify the Chamber that they have been released from conducting and submitting to the City a PHTID fiscal audit covering the final nine months of their management term, July 1, 2021 – March 30, 2022.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Do not adopt the proposed Resolution releasing the Chamber from completing a nine-month fiscal audit covering the final nine months of their management term of July 1, 2021 – March 30, 2022.

ATTACHMENTS:
 Proposed Resolution
 Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement
 Exhibit 2 – Resolution Approving First Amendment to Owners’ Association Agreement Prepared by: Zach Seal, Economic Development Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City

9.8 Packet Pg. 169
1 RESOLUTION NO. ___-23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NOTIFY THE PLEASANT HILL CHAMBER

OF COMMERCE THAT THEY ARE RELEASED FROM CONDUCTING AND

SUBMITTING TO THE CITY A FINANCIAL AUDIT OF THE PLEASANT HILL TOURISM

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FINAL NINE MONTHS OF THEIR MANAGEMENT TERM, JULY 1, 2021 TO MARCH 30, 2022.

WHEREAS, on March 20, 2017, the City Council, approved Resolution No. 29-17 establishing the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District (PHTID) for a five (5) year term, beginning April 1, 2017, and continuing through March 31, 2022; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2017, the City Council approved Resolution No. 44-17 designating the Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) as the PHTID Owners’ Association from April 1, 2017 until March 30, 2022, and authorized the City Manager to execute the Owners’ Association Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 2020, the City Council authorized a First Amendment to the Owners’ Association Agreement by approving Resolution No. 27-20, which adjusted the PHTID audit schedule to cover the July 1 to June 30 period and be due the following September 30 of each year; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of January 24, 2022 the City Council held a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 7-22 renewing the PHTID for a five (5) year term beginning April 1, 2022, and continuing through March 31, 2027, and approving the Management District Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 7, 2022, the City Council, approved Resolution No. 12-22 designating Stay Pleasant Hill to serve as the Owners’ Association of the PHTID from April 1, 2022 until March 30, 2027; and
WHEREAS, on October 3, 2022, the Chamber notified the City that the Chamber is not planning to complete and submit a fiscal audit for the final nine months of the Agreement, July 1 2021 – March 30, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on February 22, 2023, the Budget Committee recommended that the City Council release the Chamber from completing and submitting a fiscal audit covering the final nine months of their PHTID management term, July 1 2021 – March 30, 2022; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that, the City Manager is hereby authorized to notify the Chamber that they are released from conducting and submitting to the City, an audit of the PHTID for the July 1, 2021 – March 30, 2022 period.

9.8.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Chamber TID Audit Exemption) 2 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of May 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

9.8.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.b
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Exhibit 1 – Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.c
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Exhibit 2 – Resolution Approving First Amendment to Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.c
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Exhibit 2 – Resolution Approving First Amendment to Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.c
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Exhibit 2 – Resolution Approving First Amendment to Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

9.8.c
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Exhibit 2 – Resolution Approving First Amendment to Owners’ Association Agreement (Chamber TID Audit Exemption)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 15, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 APPROVING A SECOND

AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH STAY PLEASANT HILL

TO SERVE AS THE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION FOR THE PLEASANT

HILL TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT

SYNOPSIS
At its February 22, 2023 meeting, the Budget Committee requested that staff amend the City’s Owners’ Association Agreement with Stay Pleasant Hill to manage the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District (PHTID). This Second Amendment is intended to ensure that Stay Pleasant Hill’s fiscal audits of the PHTID cover the full five-year term of the Agreement. To this end, the Amendment requires Stay Pleasant Hill’s audited financial statements to match the annual reporting schedule of the PHTID Agreement (April 1 – March 31). The annual due date for the audited financial statement will be moved from October 31 to August 31. In addition, if the Agreement were to be terminated early, the Amendment requires Stay Pleasant Hill to complete an audit up to the termination date to close out the Agreement. Finally, the Amendment adds a new section to the Agreement, clarifying that the Agreement’s final annual fiscal audit is required even though the completion of the audit will occur after the end of the Agreement term.

In addition to the fiscal audit requirement, the Annual Report, Maintenance and Access to Records, as well as Indemnification, shall also survive termination or expiration of the Agreement, but only as to events or obligations occurring during the term of the Agreement.

The attached Resolution, approving this Second Amendment to the Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Amendment, is submitted for Council approval.

DISCUSSION
On February 7, 2022, the Pleasant Hill City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Stay Pleasant Hill to serve as the Owners’ Association for the PHTID, to be effective on April 1, 2022 and continuing for five years until March 31, 2027. On March 7, 2022, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement, amending the time period for the annual reports from calendar to fiscal year.

9.9 Packet Pg. 186
The former Owners’ Association of the PHTID, the Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce, notified City staff that the Chamber is not planning to complete a fiscal audit covering the final nine months of their PHTID management term because their PHTID budget schedule (July 1 – June 30) is different than the annual PHTID reporting schedule (April 1 – March 31).

Subsequently, the Budget Committee requested on February 22, 2023 that staff amend the Stay Pleasant Hill PHTID Agreement to ensure that Stay Pleasant Hill’s PHTID fiscal audits cover the full five-year term of the Agreement.

Staff recommends the Council approve the attached Resolution amending the Stay Pleasant Hill PHTID Agreement, as follows (new language is underlined):

4. Annual Report By October 30thAugust 31st of each year, Contractor shall submit to the City Council the report required by Streets and Highways Code section 36650 and the PHTID Management District Plan, hereinafter "the Annual Report". The Annual Report based on the prior fiscal year shall be prepared and submitted to the City Council by October 30thAugust 31st of each year this Agreement is in effect. Each Annual Report shall include an audited financial statement.

The audited financial statements shall annually cover April 1 to March 31 during the entire term of the Agreement. If this Agreement is terminated early, Stay Pleasant Hill will be required to complete an audit up to the termination date to close out the Agreement, which shall verify any unspent funds have been transferred to the City or the new Owners’ Association.

Staff also recommends the Council add the following new Section, as follows (new language is underlined):

28. Continuing Obligations The obligations contained in Sections 4 (Annual Report), 9 (Indemnification), and 15 (Maintenance of Records; Access to Records), shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement, but only as to events or obligations occurring during the term of the Agreement.

The resolution also authorizes the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to the Agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT
No direct fiscal impact to the City has been identified.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

9.9 Packet Pg. 187

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt the proposed Resolution approving a Second Amendment to the Stay Pleasant Hill PHTID Owners’ Association Agreement, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to the Owners’ Association Agreement.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Council could choose not to adopt the attached Resolution and leave the Stay Pleasant Hill PHTID Owners’ Association Agreement unchanged.

ATTACHMENT(S):
 Proposed Resolution
 Exhibit 1 - Second Amendment to the Owners’ Association Agreement  Exhibit 2 - First Amendment to the Owners’ Association Agreement  Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement
Prepared by: Zach Seal, Economic Development Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

9.9 Packet Pg. 188
1 RESOLUTION NO. ___-23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH STAY PLEASANT HILL TO SERVE AS THE OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION FOR THE PLEASANT HILL

TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2022, the City Council approved the renewal of the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District (PHTID) for five additional years, extending through March 31, 2027; and
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2022, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Stay Pleasant Hill to serve as the Owners’ Association for the PHTID; and
WHEREAS, on March 7, 2022, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Owners’ Association Agreement, establishing the time-period for the annual reports from calendar to fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this Second Amendment to the PHTID Owners’ Association Agreement establishes that Stay Pleasant Hill’s audited financial statements shall match the annual reporting schedule of the Agreement (April 1 – March 31), and the annual due date for the audited financial statement will be moved from October 31 to August 31; and WHEREAS, this Second Amendment to the Agreement establishes that if the Agreement is terminated early, Stay Pleasant Hill shall complete an audit up to the termination date to close out the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, this Second Amendment to the Agreement establishes that the obligations contained in Sections 4 (Annual Report), 9 (Indemnification), and 15 (Maintenance of Records; Access to Records), shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement, but only as to events or obligations occurring during the term of the Agreement; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that, the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a Second Amendment to the Owners’ Association Agreement for the PHTID.
[Signatures on the Following Page]

9.9.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) 2 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of May 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

9.9.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH STAY PLEASANT HILL TO

SERVE AS THE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION FOR THE PLEASANT HILL TOURISM

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
This Second Amendment, dated the ____ of May, 2023, hereinafter referred to as the Effective Date", is by and between the City of Pleasant Hill, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as " City", and Stay Pleasant Hill, a California non-profit corporation, hereinafter referred to as " Contractor", and collectively referred to as " Parties".

RECITALS
A. On February 7, 2022, the Pleasant Hill City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Stay Pleasant Hill to serve as the Owners' Association for the Pleasant Hill Tourism improvement District (PHTID), to be effective on April 1, 2022 and continue for five years until March 31, 2027; and B. On March 7, 2022, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Owners’ Association Agreement, establishing the time-period for the annual reports from calendar to fiscal year; and C. Section 4 of the Agreement concerns the annual reports and audited financial statements. Stay Pleasant Hill’s audited financial statements shall match the annual reporting schedule of the Agreement (April 1 – March 31), and the annual due date for the audited financial statement will be moved from October 31 to August 31. If the Agreement is terminated early, Stay Pleasant Hill shall complete an audit up to the termination date to close out the Agreement; and
D. The obligations contained in Sections 4 (Annual Report), 9 (Indemnification), and 15 (Maintenance of Records; Access to Records), shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement, but only as to events or obligations occurring during the term of the Agreement.

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
Now, therefore, the parties agree to amend the Owners' Association Agreement as follows:

Section 4 is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following new Section 4 (new language is underlined):

4. Annual Report By October 30thAugust 31st of each year, Contractor shall submit to the City Council the report required by Streets and Highways Code section 36650 and the PHTID Management District Plan, hereinafter "the Annual Report". The Annual Report based on the prior fiscal year shall be prepared and submitted to the City Council by October 30thAugust 31st of each year this Agreement is in effect. Each Annual Report shall include an audited financial statement.

9.9.b
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Second Amendment to the Owners Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) The audited financial statements shall annually cover April 1 to March 31 during the entire term of the Agreement. If this Agreement is terminated early, Stay Pleasant Hill will be required to complete an audit up to the termination date to close out the Agreement, which shall verify any unspent funds have been transferred to the City or the new Owners’ Association.

Section 28 is hereby added (new language is underlined):

28. Continuing Obligations The obligations contained in Sections 4 (Annual Report), 9 (Indemnification), and 15 (Maintenance of Records; Access to Records), shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement, but only as to events or obligations occurring during the term of the Agreement.

All other provisions of the Owners;' Association Agreement shall remain as written.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.

City of Pleasant Hill
By__________________________

____________________________
June Catalano, City Manager
Stay Pleasant Hill
By__________________________
__________________________________
Patricia Snowden, Chief Executive Officer
Patricia Snowden

9.9.b
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Second Amendment to the Owners Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH STAY PLEASANT HILL TO

SERVE AS THE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION FOR THE PLEASANT HILL TOURISM

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
This First Amendment, dated the of March, 2022, hereinafter referred to as the Effective Date", is by and between the City ofPleasant Hill, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as " City", and Stay Pleasant Hill, a California non- profit corporation, hereinafter referred to as " Contractor", and collectively referred to as " Parties".

RECITALS
A. On February 7, 2022 the Pleasant Hill City Council approved a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Stay Pleasant Hill to serve as the Owners' Association for the Pleasant Hill Tourism improvement District (PHTID), to be effective on April 1, 2022 and continue for five years until March 31, 2027; and B. Section 4 of the Agreement concerns the annual reports. The reports should be completed on a fiscal year basis instead of a calendar year basis. Therefore, it is necessary to change the word " calendar" to " fiscal".

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
Now, therefore, the parties agree to amend the Owners' Association Agreement as follows:

Section 4 is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following new Section 4,

4. Annual Report By October 30'h of each year, Contractor shall submit to the City Council the report required by Streets and Highways Code section 36650 and the PHTID Management District Plan, hereinafter "the Annual Report". The Annual Report based on the prior fiscal year shall be prepared and submitted to the City Council by October 301 of each year this Agreement is in effect. Each Annual Report shall include an audited financial statement.

All other provisions ofthe Owners;' Association Agreement shall remain as written.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.

CityZP jeos, nt Hill
print name
Stay Pleasant Hill
By a9k1- I. .
print name

9.9.c
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - First Amendment to the Owners Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
1 2022-2027
Prepared pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, Streets and Highways Code section 36600 et seq. January 24, 2022

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
2 Contents
I. OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................................................3 II. BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................................5 III. BOUNDARY ...........................................................................................................................................6 IV. ASSESSMENT BUDGET AND SERVICES....................................................................................7 A. Annual Service Plan............................................................................................................ 7 B. Annual Budget .................................................................................................................... 9 C. California Constitutional Compliance .............................................................................. 10 D. Assessment........................................................................................................................ 12 E. Penalties and Interest ........................................................................................................ 13 F. Time and Manner for Collecting Assessments................................................................. 13 V. GOVERNANCE...................................................................................................................................14 A. Owners’ Association......................................................................................................... 14 B. Brown Act and California Public Records Act Compliance ............................................ 14 C. Annual Report................................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX 1 – LAW........................................................................................................................................16 APPENDIX 2 – ASSESSED BUSINESSES .................................................................................................27 Prepared by
Civitas
(800)999-7781
www.civitasadvisors.com

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
3 I. OVERVIEW
Developed by the City of Pleasant Hill Economic Development Department and lodging businesses in Pleasant Hill, the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District (“PHTID”) is an assessment district proposed to provide specific benefits to payors, by funding sales, marketing, and communications efforts for assessed businesses. This approach has been used successfully in other destination areas throughout the country to provide the benefit of additional room night sales directly to payors. In 2017, the PHTID was formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (“94 Law”) for a five (5) year term. This effort seeks to renew the PHTID for a five (5) year term pursuant to the provisions of the 94 Law.

Location: The PHTID includes all lodging businesses, existing and in the future, available for public occupancy located within the boundaries of the City of Pleasant Hill (“City”), as shown on the map in Section III.

Services: The PHTID is designed to provide specific benefits directly to payors by increasing awareness and demand for room night sales. Sales, marketing, and communications programs will increase demand for overnight tourism and market payors as tourist, meeting, and event destinations, thereby increasing demand for room night sales.

Budget: The total PHTID annual assessment budget for the initial year of its five (5) year operation is anticipated to be approximately $710,000. A similar budget is expected to apply to subsequent years, but this budget is expected to fluctuate as room sales do and if the assessment rate is increased pursuant to this Plan.

Cost: The initial annual assessment rate is three percent (3%) of gross short-term room rental revenue. Based on the benefit received, assessments will not be collected on:
stays of more than twenty-nine (29) consecutive days; a person as to whom, or an occupancy as to which, it is beyond the power of the city to impose the assessment; and by any state officer or employee of the federal government or a foreign government who is exempt by reason of express provision of federal law or international treaty.

In years 2024 through 2026, the assessment rate may be subject to an annual increase during the five (5) year term. At the discretion of the Stay Pleasant Hill Board, the assessment rate may be increased to a maximum rate of five percent (5%) of gross short-term room rental revenue for assessed lodging businesses. However, the increase in any year shall not exceed one percent (1%) of gross short-term room rental revenue. The assessment rate may also be decreased by the Stay Pleasant Hill Board by up to a maximum of one percent (1%) per year, but shall not drop below the initial assessment rate of three percent (3%) of gross short-term room rental revenue. Any increase or decrease authorized by the Stay Pleasant Hill Board shall be included in the Annual Report described in Section V.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
4 Collection: The City shall continue to be responsible for collecting the assessment on a quarterly basis (including any delinquencies, penalties, and interest) from each lodging business located within the boundaries of the PHTID. The City shall take all reasonable efforts to collect the assessments from each lodging business.

Duration: The PHTID will have a five (5) year life, beginning April 1, 2022, or as soon as possible thereafter and end five (5) years from its start date. Once per year, beginning on the anniversary of PHTID renewal, there is a thirty (30) day period in which owners paying fifty percent (50%) or more of the assessment may protest and initiate a City Council hearing on PHTID termination.

Management: Stay Pleasant Hill (“SPH”) will serve as the PHTID’s Owners’ Association. The Owners’ Association is charged with managing funds and implementing programs in accordance with this Plan and must provide annual reports to the City Council.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
5 II. BACKGROUND
TIDs are an evolution of the traditional Business Improvement District. The first TID was formed in West Hollywood, California in 1989. Since then, over 100 California destinations have followed suit. In recent years, other states have begun adopting the California model – Montana, South Dakota, Washington, Colorado, Texas and Louisiana have adopted TID laws. Several other states are in the process of adopting their own legislation. The cities of Wichita, Kansas and Newark, New Jersey used an existing business improvement district law to form a TID. And, some cities, like Portland, Oregon and Memphis, Tennessee have utilized their home rule powers to create TIDs without a state law.

California’s TIDs collectively
raise over $300 million
annually for local destination
marketing. With competitors
raising their budgets, and
increasing rivalry for visitor
dollars, it is important that
Pleasant Hill lodging
businesses continue to invest
in stable, lodging-specific
sales, marketing and
communications programs.

TIDs utilize the efficiencies of
private sector operation in the market-based promotion of tourism districts. TIDs allow lodging business owners to organize their efforts to increase demand for room night sales. Lodging business owners within the TID pay an assessment and those funds are used to provide services that increase demand for room night sales.

In California, most TIDs are formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994. This law allows for the creation of a benefit assessment district to raise funds within a specific geographic area. The key difference between TIDs and other benefit assessment districts is that funds raised are returned to the private non-profit corporation governing the district.

There are many benefits to TIDs:
• Funds must be spent on services and improvements that provide a specific benefit only to those who pay;
• Funds cannot be diverted to general government programs; • They are customized to fit the needs of payors in each destination; • They allow for a wide range of services;
• They are designed, created, and governed by those who will pay the assessment; and • They provide a stable, long-term funding source for tourism promotion. 1 2 4 6 9 12 19 25 29 32 38
46 61 64 70 75
88 95 99101104109110
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
19891995200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020 Number of Districts Operating in
California

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
6 III. BOUNDARY
The PHTID will include all lodging businesses, existing and in the future, available for public occupancy located within the boundaries of City of Pleasant Hill.

Lodging business means: any structure or any portion of any structure that is occupied or intended or designated for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes, including any hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodging-house, rooming- house, apartment-house, dormitory, public or private club, recreational vehicle park, mobile home or house trailer at a fixed location or other similar structure or portion therefor. The term “lodging business” as used herein only includes businesses designed for occupancy for periods of less than twenty-nine (29) days.

The boundary, as shown in the map below, currently includes seven (7) lodging businesses. A complete listing of lodging businesses within the PHTID can be found in Appendix 2.

Martinez
Concord
Walnut Creek
Lafayette Walnut Creek
Taylor Blvd
Boyd Rd
Pleasant Hill Rd
Gregory Ln
Me
Viking Dr rcury Way
Contra Costa Blvd
Grayson Rd
Oak Park Blvd
Contra Costa Canal Trl
Ruth Dr
Lucille Ln
Paso Nogal
Devon Ave
Buskirk Ave
Chilpancingo Pkwy
Iron Horse
Hookston Rd
Ardith Dr
Kiki Dr
Norse Dr
Paso Nogal Rd
Doris Dr
C el ave al nd Rd
Mayhew Way
Soule Ave
Shirley Dr
Doray Dr
Gladys Dr
Elderwood Dr
Roberta Ave
Gail Dr
45 Elliot Dr
Mazie Dr
Kahrs Ave
Mary Dr
Belle Ave
Putnam Blvd
Hamilton Dr
Apol ol Way
Beth Dr
Coggins Dr
Sylvia Dr
Sherman Dr
Madeira Way
Ellinwood Dr
Marta Dr
Pleasant Valley Dr
Oakvue Rd
Byron Dr
Vessing Rd
Buttner Rd
Santa Lucia Dr
Rose Ln
Little Ln
Slater Ave
Strand Ave
Twinview Pl
P
Crescent Plz
rice Ln
Starlyn Dr
Shetland Dr
Pleasant View Dr
Peggy Dr
Eloise Ave
Fernwood Dr 3rd Ave S
Marlee Rd
Barnett Cir
Wendell Ln
Violet Way
Daisy Pl
Tempe Ct
Capri Ln
Contra Costa Blvd
Slater Ave
Pleasant Hill City Limits
§¨¦680
§¨¦680
¬«4
¬«242
Pleasant Hill TID

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
7 IV. ASSESSMENT BUDGET AND SERVICES
A. Annual Service Plan
Assessment funds will be spent to provide specific benefits conferred or privileges granted directly to the payors that are not provided to those not charged, and which do not exceed the reasonable cost to the City of conferring the benefits or granting the privileges. The privileges and services provided with the PHTID funds are sales, marketing and communications programs available only to assessed businesses.

A service plan assessment budget has been developed to deliver services that benefit the assessed businesses. A detailed annual assessment budget will be developed and approved by SPH. The table below illustrates the initial annual assessment budget allocations. The total initial assessment budget is $710,000.

Although actual revenues will fluctuate due to market conditions, the proportional allocations of the assessment budget shall remain the same. However, the SPH Board shall have the authority to adjust assessment budget allocations between the categories by no more than fifteen percent (15%) of the total assessment budget per year. A description of the proposed improvements and activities for the initial year of operation is below. The same activities are proposed for subsequent years. In the event of a legal challenge against the PHTID, any and all assessment funds may be used for the costs of defending the PHTID.

Each budget category includes all costs related to providing that service. For example, the sales, marketing, and communications budget includes the cost of staff time dedicated to overseeing and implementing the sales, marketing, and communications program. Staff time dedicated purely to administrative tasks is allocated to the administrative portion of the budget. The costs of an individual Sales, Marketing,
and
Communications,
$532,500, 75%
City Fee, $14,200,
2%
Contingency &
Reserve
$35,500, 5%
Administration &
Operations,
$127,800 18%
INITIAL ANNUAL ASSESSMENT BUDGET - $710,000

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
8 staff member may be allocated to multiple budget categories. The staffing levels necessary to provide the services below will be determined by the SPH on an as-needed basis.

Sales, Marketing & Communications
A sales, marketing and communications program will promote assessed businesses as tourist, meeting, and event destinations. The sales, marketing and communications program will have a central theme of promoting Pleasant Hill as a desirable place for overnight visits. The program will have the goal of increasing overnight visitation and room night sales at assessed businesses, and may include the following activities:
• Marketing efforts to increase awareness and optimize internet presence to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses, including public relations, online and social media campaigns, updating and maintaining website, print, television, digital and radio advertising;
• Attendance of trade shows, professional industry conferences and affiliation events to promote assessed businesses;
• Sales blitzes for assessed businesses;
• Familiarization tours of assessed businesses;
• Development of a strategic plan to benefit assessed businesses, including branding and destination management;
• Preparation and production of collateral promotional materials such as brochures, flyers and maps featuring assessed businesses;
• Lead generation activities designed to attract tourists and group events to assessed businesses; • Director of Sales and General Manager meetings to plan and coordinate tourism promotion efforts for assessed businesses;
• Comprehensive and integrated way finding signage systems, including signage to parking lots and decks, designed to create a visitor experience that will bring repeat visits to assessed businesses;
• Transportation programs connecting assessed businesses and local music venues, sports venues, and other attractions, to increase overnight visitation and room sales at assessed businesses;
• Art and cultural projects to attract overnight visitors to assessed businesses; • Local destination marketing programs designed to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses;
• Destination product development programs and improvements designed to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses; and
• Sports and outdoor recreation marketing programs designed to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses.

Administration and Operations
The administration and operations portion of the budget shall be utilized for administrative staffing costs, office costs, advocacy, and other general administrative costs such as insurance, legal, and accounting fees.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
9 Contingency/Reserve
The budget includes a contingency line item to account for uncollected assessments, if any. If there are contingency funds collected, they may be held in a reserve fund or utilized for other program, administration, or renewal costs at the discretion of Stay Pleasant Hill. Policies relating to contributions to the reserve fund, the target amount of the reserve fund, and expenditure of monies from the reserve fund shall be set by the SPH Board. Contingency/reserve funds may be spent on PHTID programs or administrative and renewal costs in such proportions as determined by the SPH Board. The reserve fund may be used for the costs of renewing the PHTID.

City Collection Fee
The City of Pleasant Hill shall retain a fee equal to two percent (2%) of the amount of assessment collected, to cover its costs of collection and administration.

B. Annual Budget
The total 5-year improvement and service plan assessment budget is projected at approximately $710,000 annually, or $5,070,440 through 2027 if maximum assessment increases are made by the SPH board. A similar budget is expected to apply to subsequent years, but this budget is expected to fluctuate as room sales do and if the assessment rate is increased. If the maximum annual assessment increases are adopted by the Owners’ Association upon approval, the annual budget will increase as illustrated in the table below. The initial annual assessment rate is three percent (3%) of gross shortterm room rental revenue for lodging businesses and cannot be increased in years 2022 and 2023. In years 2024 through 2026, the assessment rate may be increased to a maximum rate of five percent (5%) of gross short-term room rental revenue for assessed lodging businesses. However, the increase in any year shall not exceed one percent (1%) of gross short-term room rental revenue. The assessment rate may also be decreased by the Stay Pleasant Hill Board by up to a maximum of one percent (1%) per year but shall not drop below the initial three percent (3%) of gross short-term room rental revenue.

The table below demonstrates the maximum with the assumption that the rates will be increased in annually from 2024 through 2026 as it is a required disclosure, it is not the anticipated course of action.

Alternate courses of action may be taken in regards to implementing the assessment rate increase other than what is demonstrated in the chart below, within the parameters of this Management District Plan.

Additionally, a three percent (3%) annual increase in the total budget is shown, to account for estimated increased room night sales as a result of PHTID efforts. This three percent (3%) annual increase is a conservative estimate based on the effects of similarly sized TID budgets.

The table below demonstrates the maximum cost of improvements and services over the PHTID’s five (5) year term.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
10 Estimated Annual Budget If
Maximum Assessment Rates are Adopted 2024-2027
Year Sales, Marketing
and
Communications
Administration City Fee Contingency/Reserve Total
2022-23 $532,500 $127,800 $14,200 $35,500 $710,000
2023-24 $548,475 $131,634 $14,626 $36,565 $731,300
2024-25 $753,220 $180,773 $20,086 $50,215 $1,004,294
2025-26 $969,771 $232,745 $25,861 $64,651 $1,293,028
2026-27 $998,864 $239,727 $26,636 $66,591 $1,331,818
Total $3,802,830 $912,679 $101,409 $253,522 $5,070,440
The table below demonstrates the annual improvement and service plan budget with the assumption that the rates will not be increased during the district’s five (5) year term. Additionally, a three percent (3%) annual increase in the total budget is shown to account for estimated increased room night sales as a result of PHTID efforts.

Estimated Annual Budget If Maximum Assessment
Rates Are Not Adopted 2022-2027
Year Sales, Marketing
and
Communications
Administration City Fee Contingency/Reserve Total
2022-23 $532,500 $127,800 $14,200 $35,500 $ 710,000
2023-24 $548,475 $131,634 $14,626 $36,565 $ 731,300
2024-25 $564,929 $135,583 $15,065 $37,662 $ 753,239
2025-26 $581,877 $139,651 $15,517 $38,792 $ 775,837
2026-27 $599,333 $143,840 $15,982 $39,956 $ 799,111
Total $2,827,114 $678,508 $ 75,390 $ 188,475 $3,769,467 A. California Constitutional Compliance
The PHTID assessment is not a property-based assessment subject to the requirements of Proposition 218. Courts have found Proposition 218 limited the term ‘assessments’ to levies on real property.1 Rather, the PHTID assessment is a business-based assessment, and is subject to Proposition 26.

Pursuant to Proposition 26 all levies are a tax unless they fit one of seven exceptions. Two of these exceptions apply to the PHTID, a “specific benefit” and a “specific government service.” Both require that the costs of benefits or services do not exceed the reasonable costs to the City of conferring the benefits or providing the services.
1 Jarvis v. the City of San Diego 72 Cal App. 4th 230

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
11 1. Specific Benefit
Proposition 26 requires that assessment funds be expended on, “a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege.”2 The services in this Plan are designed to provide targeted benefits directly to assessed businesses, and are intended only to provide benefits and services directly to those businesses paying the assessment. These services are tailored not to serve the general public, businesses in general, or parcels of land, but rather to serve the specific businesses within the PHTID. The activities described in this Plan are specifically targeted to increase demand for room night sales for assessed lodging businesses within the boundaries of the PHTID and are narrowly tailored. PHTID funds will be used exclusively to provide the specific benefit of increased demand for room night sales directly to the assessees. Assessment funds shall not be used to feature non-assessed lodging businesses in PHTID programs, or to directly generate sales for non-assessed businesses. The activities paid for from assessment revenues are business services constituting and providing specific benefits to the assessed businesses.

The assessment imposed by this PHTID is for a specific benefit conferred directly to the payors that is not provided to those not charged. The specific benefit conferred directly to the payors is an increase in demand for room night sales. The specific benefit of an increase in demand for room night sales for assessed lodging businesses will be provided only to lodging businesses paying the district assessment, with sales, marketing and communications programs promoting lodging businesses paying the PHTID assessment. The sales, marketing, and communications programs will be designed to increase room night sales at each assessed lodging businesses. Because they are necessary to provide the sales, marketing, and communications programs that specifically benefit the assessed lodging businesses, the administration and contingency services also provide the specific benefit of increased demand for room night sales to the assessed lodging businesses.

Although the PHTID, in providing specific benefits to payors, may produce incidental benefits to non-paying businesses, the incidental benefit does not preclude the services from being considered a specific benefit. The legislature has found that, “A specific benefit is not excluded from classification as a ‘specific benefit’ merely because an indirect benefit to a nonpayor occurs incidentally and without cost to the payor as a consequence of providing the specific benefit to the payor.”3

2. Specific Government Service
The assessment may also be utilized to provide, “a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product.”4 The legislature has recognized that sales, marketing and communications services like those to be provided by the PHTID are government services within the meaning of Proposition 265. Further, the legislature has determined that “a specific government service is not excluded from classification as a ‘specific 2 Cal. Const. art XIII C § 1(e)(1)
3 Government Code § 53758(a)
4 Cal. Const. art XIII C § 1(e)(2)
5 Government Code § 53758(b)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
12 government service’ merely because an indirect benefit to a nonpayor occurs incidentally and without cost to the payor as a consequence of providing the specific government service to the payor.”6

3. Reasonable Cost
PHTID services will be implemented carefully to ensure they do not exceed the reasonable cost of such services. The full amount assessed will be used to provide the services described herein. Funds will be managed by SPH, and reports submitted on an annual basis to the City. Only assessed lodging businesses will be featured in marketing materials, receive sales leads generated from PHTID-funded activities, be featured in advertising campaigns, and benefit from other PHTID-funded services. Nonassessed lodging businesses will not receive these, nor any other, PHTID-funded services and benefits.

The PHTID-funded programs are all targeted directly at and feature only assessed businesses. It is, however, possible that there will be a spill over benefit to non-assessed businesses. If non-assessed lodging businesses receive incremental room nights, that portion of the promotion or program generating those room nights shall be paid with non-PHTID funds. PHTID funds shall only be spent to benefit the assessed businesses and shall not be spent on that portion of any program which directly generates incidental room nights for non-assessed businesses.

B. Assessment
The initial annual assessment rate is three percent (3%) of gross short-term room rental revenue for lodging businesses. Based on the benefit received, assessments will not be collected on: stays of more than twenty-nine (29) consecutive days; a person as to whom, or an occupancy as to which, it is beyond the power of the city to impose the tax; and by any state officer or employee of the federal government or a foreign government who is exempt by reason of express provision of federal law or international treaty.

In years 2024 through 2026, the assessment may be subject to an increase during the five (5) year term.

At the discretion of the Stay Pleasant Hill Board, the assessment rate may be increased to a maximum rate of five percent (5%) of gross short-term room rental revenue for assessed lodging businesses.

However, the increase in any year shall not exceed one percent (1%) of gross short-term room rental revenue. The assessment rate may also be decreased by the Stay Pleasant Hill Board by up to a maximum of one percent (1%) per year but shall not drop below the initial three percent (3%) of gross short-term room rental revenue. Any increase or decrease authorized by the Stay Pleasant Hill Board shall be included in the Annual Report described in Section V.

The term “gross room rental revenue” as used herein means the consideration charged, whether or not received, for the occupancy of space in a hotel, valued in money, whether to be received in money, goods, services, labor or otherwise, including all receipts, cash, credits and property and services of any kind or nature, without any deduction therefrom whatsoever. Gross room rental revenue shall not include any federal, state or local taxes collected, including but not limited to transient occupancy taxes.

The assessment is levied upon and a direct obligation of the assessed lodging business. However, the assessed lodging business may, at its discretion, pass the assessment on to transients. The amount of assessment, if passed on to each transient, shall be disclosed in advance and separately stated from the amount of rent charged and any other applicable taxes, and each transient shall receive a receipt for 6 Government Code § 53758(b)

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
13 payment from the business. If the PHTID assessment is identified separately it shall be disclosed as the “PHTID Assessment.” As an alternative, the disclosure may include the amount of the PHTID assessment and the amount of the assessment imposed pursuant to the California Tourism Marketing Act, Government Code §13995 et seq. and shall be disclosed as the “Tourism Assessment.” The assessment is imposed solely upon, and is the sole obligation of the assessed lodging business even if it is passed on to transients. The assessment shall not be considered revenue for any purpose, including calculation of transient occupancy taxes.

Bonds shall not be issued.

C. Penalties and Interest
The PHTID shall reimburse the City of Pleasant Hill for any costs and fees (including, but not limited to, both City staff time as reasonably calculated by the City, as well as any attorney’s fees) associated with collecting unpaid assessments. If sums in excess of the delinquent PHTID assessment are sought to be recovered in the same collection action by the City, the PHTID shall bear its pro rata share of such collection costs. Assessed businesses which are delinquent in paying the assessment shall be responsible for paying:

1. Original Delinquency: Any lodging business which fails to remit any assessment imposed within the time required shall pay a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount of the assessment in addition to the amount of the assessment.

2. Continued Delinquency: Any lodging business which fails to remit any delinquent remittance on or before a period of thirty (30) days following the date on which the remittance first became delinquent shall pay a second delinquency penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount of the assessment in addition to the amount of the assessment and the ten percent (10%) penalty first imposed.

3. Fraud: If the City determines in its sole reasonable discretion that the nonpayment of any remittance due under this section is due to fraud and/or intent to mislead the City, a penalty of twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the assessment shall be added thereto in addition to the penalties stated in subsections 1 and 2 of this section.

4. Interest: In addition to the penalties imposed, any lodging business which fails to remit any assessment imposed shall pay interest at the rate of one half of one percent (0.5%) per month or fraction thereof on the amount of the assessment, exclusive of penalties, from the date on which the remittance first became delinquent until paid.

5. Penalties Merged with Assessment: Every penalty imposed and such interest as accrues under the provisions of this section shall become a part of the assessment required to be paid under this section.

D. Time and Manner for Collecting Assessments
The PHTID assessment will be implemented beginning April 1, 2022 or as soon as possible thereafter, and end five (5) years from its start date. The City will be responsible for collecting the assessment on a quarterly basis (including any delinquencies, penalties, and interest) from each lodging business. The City shall take all reasonable efforts to collect the assessments from each lodging business. The City shall forward the assessments collected, less the two percent (2%) collection fee, to the Owners’ Association.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
14 V. GOVERNANCE
A. Owners’ Association
The City Council, through adoption of this Management District Plan, has the right, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §36651, to identify the body that shall implement the proposed program, which shall be the Owners’ Association of the PHTID as defined in Streets and Highways Code §36612. The City Council has determined that Stay Pleasant Hill (“SPH”) shall serve as the Owners’ Association for the PHTID. The City shall enter into a contract with Stay Pleasant Hill for administration of the PHTID. The City reserves the right to conduct regular financial and/or operational audits, as reasonably determined to be appropriate by the City in the City’s sole discretion, of the Owners’ Association. Any such City audits will receive the full and unqualified cooperation and assistance of the Owners’ Association, and upon request by City will be paid for in whole or in part with PHTID funds. Consistent with law, and for good cause as reasonably demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Council, the City Council at a noticed public hearing may designate a different qualified private nonprofit entity as the Owners’ Association of the PHTID, to replace either SPH, or any subsequent designated Owners’ Association.

SPH as the new Owners’ Association, will appoint a new Board of Directors, comprised of seven (7) members. The members of the SPH Board shall include:
• One (1) representative of the Hyatt hotel;
• One (1) representative of the Marriot hotel;
• One (1) representative of the Homewood Suites by Hilton hotel; • One (1) representative of the Sonesta hotel;
• One (1) representative of a lodging business not affiliated with a national brand; • One(1) representative of the Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce; and • One (1) representative of the City of Pleasant Hill.

In the event of changes in hotel ownership or brand affiliation the SPH Board reserves the right to modify its composition without requiring an amendment to this plan. If there is an addition to the Board or if the SPH board would like to reduce the size of the Board, they will need to modify the Management District Plan. SPH shall be responsible for managing funds and implementing programs in accordance with this Plan and by direction of the SPH Board and must provide annual reports to the City Council.

B. Brown Act and California Public Records Act Compliance An Owners’ Association is a private entity and may not be considered a public entity for any purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials for any purpose. The Owners’ Association is, however, subject to government regulations relating to transparency, namely the Ralph M. Brown Act and the California Public Records Act. These regulations are designed to promote public accountability. The Owners’ Association acts as a legislative body under the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code §54950 et seq.). Thus, meetings of the SPH Board and certain committees must be held in compliance with the public notice and other requirements of the Brown Act. The Owners’ Association is also subject to the record keeping and disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. Accordingly, the Owners’ Association shall publicly report any action taken and the vote or abstention on that action of each member present for the action.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
15 C. Annual Report
SPH shall present an annual report at the end of each year of operation to the City Council pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §36650 (see Appendix 1). The annual report shall include:
• Any proposed changes in the boundaries of the improvement district or in any benefit zones or classification of businesses within the district.
• The improvements and activities to be provided for that fiscal year. • An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements and the activities for that fiscal year. • The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each business owner to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her business for that fiscal year.
• The estimated amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year.
• The estimated amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied pursuant to this part.

In addition, the annual report shall include:
• Details of the accomplishments of the district during the previous fiscal year. • An overview of the budgeted versus actual expenditures and revenue for the previous fiscal year.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
16 APPENDIX 1 – LAW
*** THIS DOCUMENT IS CURRENT THROUGH THE 2021 SUPPLEMENT *** (ALL 2020 LEGISLATION)

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
DIVISION 18. PARKING
PART 7. PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LAW OF 1994 CHAPTER 1. General Provisions
ARTICLE 1. Declarations
36600. Citation of part
This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994.” 36601. Legislative findings and declarations; Legislative guidance The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) Businesses located and operating within business districts in some of this state’s communities are economically disadvantaged, are underutilized, and are unable to attract customers due to inadequate facilities, services, and activities in the business districts. (b) It is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of business districts in order to create jobs, attract new businesses, and prevent the erosion of the business districts. (c) It is of particular local benefit to allow business districts to fund business related improvements, maintenance, and activities through the levy of assessments upon the businesses or real property that receive benefits from those improvements.
(d) Assessments levied for the purpose of conferring special benefit upon the real property or a specific benefit upon the businessesin a business district are not taxesfor the general benefit of a city, even if property, businesses, or persons not assessed receive incidental or collateral effects that benefit them. (e) Property and business improvement districts formed throughout this state have conferred special benefits upon properties and businesses within their districts and have made those properties and businesses more useful by providing the following benefits:
(1) Crime reduction. A study by the Rand Corporation has confirmed a 12-percent reduction in the incidence of robbery and an 8-percent reduction in the total incidence of violent crimes within the 30 districts studied.
(2) Job creation.
(3) Business attraction.
(4) Business retention.
(5) Economic growth.
(6) New investments.
(f) With the dissolution of redevelopment agencies throughout the state, property and business improvement districts have become even more important tools with which communities can combat blight, promote economic opportunities, and create a clean and safe environment. (g) Since the enactment of this act, the people of California have adopted Proposition 218, which added Article XIII D to the Constitution in order to place certain requirements and restrictions on the formation of, and activities, expenditures, and assessments by property-based districts. Article XIII D of the Constitution provides that property-based districts may only levy assessments for special benefits. (h) The act amending this section is intended to provide the Legislature’s guidance with regard to this act, its interaction with the provisions of Article XIII D of the Constitution, and the determination of special benefits in property-based districts.
(1) The lack of legislative guidance has resulted in uncertainty and inconsistent application of this act, which discourages the use of assessments to fund needed improvements, maintenance, and activities in property-based districts, contributing to blight and other underutilization of property.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
17 (2) Activities undertaken for the purpose of conferring special benefits upon property to be assessed inherently produce incidental or collateral effects that benefit property or persons not assessed.

Therefore, for special benefits to exist as a separate and distinct category from general benefits, the incidental or collateral effects of those special benefits are inherently part of those special benefits.

The mere fact that special benefits produce incidental or collateral effects that benefit property or persons not assessed does not convert any portion of those special benefits or their incidental or collateral effects into general benefits.
(3) It is of the utmost importance that property-based districts created under this act have clarity regarding restrictions on assessmentsthey may levy and the proper determination ofspecial benefits.

Legislative clarity with regard to this act will provide districts with clear instructions and courts with legislative intent regarding restrictions on property-based assessments, and the manner in which special benefits should be determined.
36602. Purpose of part
The purpose of this part is to supplement previously enacted provisions of law that authorize cities to levy assessments within property and business improvement districts, to ensure that those assessments conform to all constitutional requirements and are determined and assessed in accordance with the guidance set forth in this act. This part does not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or providing for the furnishing of improvements or activities or the raising of revenue for these purposes.
36603. Preemption of authority or charter city to adopt ordinances levying assessments Nothing in this part is intended to preempt the authority of a charter city to adopt ordinances providing for a different method of levying assessments for similar or additional purposes from those set forth in this part. A property and business improvement district created pursuant to this part is expressly exempt from the provisions of the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 (Division 4 (commencing with Section 2800)). 36603.5. Part prevails over conflicting provisions
Any provision of this part that conflicts with any other provision of law shall prevail over the other provision of law, as to districts created under this part.
36604. Severability
This part is intended to be construed liberally and, if any provision is held invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Assessments levied under this part are not special taxes.

ARTICLE 2. Definitions
36606. “Activities”
“Activities” means, but is not limited to, all of the following that benefit businesses or real property in the district:
(a) Promotion of public events.
(b) Furnishing of music in any public place.
(c) Promotion of tourism within the district.
(d) Marketing and economic development, including retail retention and recruitment. (e) Providing security, sanitation, graffiti removal, street and sidewalk cleaning, and other municipal services supplemental to those normally provided by the municipality. (f) Other services provided for the purpose of conferring special benefit upon assessed real property or specific benefits upon assessed businesses located in the district. 36606.5. “Assessment”
“Assessment” means a levy for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, installing, or maintaining improvements and providing activities that will provide certain benefits to properties or businesses located within a property and business improvement district.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
18 36607. “Business”
“Business” means all types of businesses and includes financial institutions and professions. 36608. “City”
“City” means a city, county, city and county, or an agency or entity created pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, the public member agencies of which includes only cities, counties, or a city and county, or the State of California. 36609. “City council”
“City council” means the city council of a city or the board of supervisors of a county, or the agency, commission, or board created pursuant to a joint powers agreement and which is a city within the meaning of this part. 36609.4. “Clerk”
“Clerk” means the clerk of the legislative body.
36609.5. “General benefit”
“General benefit” means, for purposes of a property-based district, any benefit that is not a “special benefit” as defined in Section 36615.5.
36610. “Improvement”
“Improvement” means the acquisition, construction, installation, or maintenance of any tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or more including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Parking facilities.
(b) Benches, booths, kiosks, display cases, pedestrian shelters and signs. (c) Trash receptacles and public restrooms.
(d) Lighting and heating facilities.
(e) Decorations.
(f) Parks.
(g) Fountains.
(h) Planting areas.
(i) Closing, opening, widening, or narrowing of existing streets. (j) Facilities or equipment, or both, to enhance security of persons and property within the district. (k) Ramps, sidewalks, plazas, and pedestrian malls.
(l) Rehabilitation or removal of existing structures.
36611. “Management district plan”; “Plan”
“Management district plan” or “plan” means a proposal as defined in Section 36622. 36612. “Owners’ association”
“Owners’ association” means a private nonprofit entity that is under contract with a city to administer or implement improvements, maintenance, and activities specified in the management district plan. An owners’ association may be an existing nonprofit entity or a newly formed nonprofit entity. An owners’ association is a private entity and may not be considered a public entity for any purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials for any purpose. Notwithstanding this section, an owners’ association shall comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code), at all times when matters within the subject matter of the district are heard, discussed, or deliberated, and with the California

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
19 Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code), for all records relating to activities of the district. 36614. “Property”
“Property” means real property situated within a district. 36614.5. “Property and business improvement district”; “District” “Property and business improvement district,” or “district,” means a property and business improvement district established pursuant to this part.
36614.6. “Property-based assessment”
“Property-based assessment” means any assessment made pursuant to this part upon real property. 36614.7. “Property-based district”
“Property-based district” means any district in which a city levies a property-based assessment. 36615. “Property owner”; “Business owner”; “Owner”
“Property owner” means any person shown as the owner of land on the last equalized assessment roll or otherwise known to be the owner of land by the city council. “Business owner” means any person recognized by the city as the owner of the business. “Owner” means either a business owner or a property owner. The city council has no obligation to obtain other information as to the ownership of land or businesses, and its determination of ownership shall be final and conclusive for the purposes of this part. Wherever this part requires the signature of the property owner, the signature of the authorized agent of the property owner shall be sufficient. Wherever this part requires the signature of the business owner, the signature of the authorized agent of the business owner shall be sufficient. 36615.5. “Special benefit”
“Special benefit” means, for purposes of a property-based district, a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in a district or to the public at large. Special benefit includes incidental or collateral effects that arise from the improvements, maintenance, or activities of property-based districts even if those incidental or collateral effects benefit property or persons not assessed. Special benefit excludes general enhancement of property value.
36616. “Tenant”
“Tenant” means an occupant pursuant to a lease of commercial space or a dwelling unit, other than an owner.

ARTICLE 3. Prior Law
36617. Alternate method of financing certain improvements and activities; Effect on other provisions This part provides an alternative method of financing certain improvements and activities. The provisions of this part shall not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or providing for the furnishing of improvements or activities or the raising of revenue for these purposes. Every improvement area established pursuant to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500) of this division) is valid and effective and is unaffected by this part.

CHAPTER 2. Establishment
36620. Establishment of property and business improvement district A property and business improvement district may be established as provided in this chapter.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
20 36620.5. Requirement of consent of city council
A county may not form a district within the territorial jurisdiction of a city without the consent of the city council of that city. A city may not form a district within the unincorporated territory of a county without the consent of the board of supervisors of that county. A city may not form a district within the territorial jurisdiction of another city without the consent of the city council of the other city.
36621. Initiation of proceedings; Petition of property or business owners in proposed district (a) Upon the submission of a written petition, signed by the property or business owners in the proposed district who will pay more than 50 percent of the assessments proposed to be levied, the city council may initiate proceedings to form a district by the adoption of a resolution expressing its intention to form a district.

The amount of assessment attributable to property or a business owned by the same property or business owner that is in excess of 40 percent of the amount of all assessments proposed to be levied, shall not be included in determining whether the petition is signed by property or business owners who will pay more than 50 percent of the total amount of assessments proposed to be levied. (b) The petition of property or business owners required under subdivision (a) shall include a summary of the management district plan. That summary shall include all of the following:
(1) A map showing the boundaries of the district.
(2) Information specifying where the complete management district plan can be obtained. (3) Information specifying that the complete management district plan shall be furnished upon request.
(c) The resolution of intention described in subdivision (a) shall contain all of the following:
(1) A brief description of the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment will be levied on property or businesses within the district, a statement as to whether bonds will be issued, and a description of the exterior boundaries of the proposed district, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The descriptions and statements do not need to be detailed and shall be sufficient if they enable an owner to generally identify the nature and extent of the improvements, maintenance, and activities, and the location and extent of the proposed district. (2) A time and place for a public hearing on the establishment of the property and business improvement district and the levy of assessments, which shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 36623.
36622. Contents of management district plan
The management district plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(a) If the assessment will be levied on property, a map of the district in sufficient detail to locate each parcel of property and, if businesses are to be assessed, each business within the district. If the assessment will be levied on businesses, a map that identifies the district boundaries in sufficient detail to allow a business owner to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the district boundaries. If the assessment will be levied on property and businesses, a map of the district in sufficient detail to locate each parcel of property and to allow a business owner to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the district boundaries.
(b) The name of the proposed district.
(c) A description of the boundaries of the district, including the boundaries of benefit zones, proposed for establishment or extension in a manner sufficient to identify the affected property and businesses included, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The boundaries of a proposed property assessment district shall not overlap with the boundaries of another existing property assessment district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a district created pursuant to this part to overlap with other assessment districts established pursuant to other provisions of law, including, but not limited to, the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500)). This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to overlap with another business assessment district created pursuant to this part. This

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
21 part does not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to overlap with a property assessment district created pursuant to this part. (d) The improvements, maintenance, and activities proposed for each year of operation of the district and the maximum cost thereof. If the improvements, maintenance, and activities proposed for each year of operation are the same, a description of the first year’s proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities and a statement that the same improvements, maintenance, and activities are proposed for subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision.
(e) The total annual amount proposed to be expended for improvements, maintenance, or activities, and debt service in each year of operation of the district. If the assessment is levied on businesses, this amount may be estimated based upon the assessment rate. If the total annual amount proposed to be expended in each year of operation of the district is not significantly different, the amount proposed to be expended in the initial year and a statement that a similar amount applies to subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision.
(f) The proposed source or sources of financing, including the proposed method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each property or business owner to calculate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her property or business. The plan also shall state whether bonds will be issued to finance improvements.
(g) The time and manner of collecting the assessments.
(h) The specific number of years in which assessments will be levied. In a new district, the maximum number of years shall be five. Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 years. Notwithstanding these limitations, a district created pursuant to this part to finance capital improvements with bonds may levy assessments until the maximum maturity of the bonds. The management district plan may set forth specific increases in assessments for each year of operation of the district. (i) The proposed time for implementation and completion of the management district plan. (j) Any proposed rules and regulations to be applicable to the district. (k) (1) A list of the properties or businesses to be assessed, including the assessor’s parcel numbers for properties to be assessed, and a statement of the method or methods by which the expenses of a district will be imposed upon benefited real property or businesses, in proportion to the benefit received by the property or business, to defray the cost thereof. (2) In a property-based district, the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined exclusively in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the activities. An assessment shall not be imposed on any parcel that exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable, and a property-based district shall separate the general benefits, if any, from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. Parcels within a property-based district that are owned or used by any city, public agency, the State of California, or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the governmental entity can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit. The value of any incidental, secondary, or collateral effects that arise from the improvements, maintenance, or activities of a property-based district and that benefit property or persons not assessed shall not be deducted from the entirety of the cost of any special benefit or affect the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel. (l) In a property-based district, the total amount of all special benefits to be conferred upon the properties located within the property-based district.
(m) In a property-based district, the total amount of general benefits, if any. (n) In a property-based district, a detailed engineer’s report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California supporting all assessments contemplated by the management district plan. (o) Any other item or matter required to be incorporated therein by the city council. 36623. Procedure to levy assessment
(a) If a city council proposes to levy a new or increased property assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure shall comply with Section 53753 of the Government Code. (b) If a city council proposes to levy a new or increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure shall comply with Section 54954.6 of the Government Code, except that notice shall be mailed to the owners of the businesses proposed to be assessed. A protest may be made orally or in writing by any interested person. Every written protest shall be filed with the clerk at or before the time fixed for the

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
22 public hearing. The city council may waive any irregularity in the form or content of any written protest. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing. Each written protest shall contain a description of the business in which the person subscribing the protest is interested sufficient to identify the business and, if a person subscribing is not shown on the official records of the city as the owner of the business, the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person subscribing is the owner of the business or the authorized representative. A written protest that does not comply with this section shall not be counted in determining a majority protest. If written protests are received from the owners or authorized representatives of businesses in the proposed district that will pay 50 percent or more of the assessments proposed to be levied and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than 50 percent, no further proceedings to levy the proposed assessment against such businesses, as contained in the resolution of intention, shall be taken for a period of one year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the city council. (c) If a city council proposes to conduct a single proceeding to levy both a new or increased property assessment and a new or increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure for the property assessment shall comply with subdivision (a), and the notice and protest and hearing procedure for the business assessment shall comply with subdivision (b). If a majority protest is received from either the property or business owners, that respective portion of the assessment shall not be levied. The remaining portion of the assessment may be levied unless the improvement or other special benefit was proposed to be funded by assessing both property and business owners.
36624. Changes to proposed assessments
At the conclusion of the public hearing to establish the district, the city council may adopt, revise, change, reduce, or modify the proposed assessment or the type or types of improvements, maintenance, and activities to be funded with the revenues from the assessments. Proposed assessments may only be revised by reducing any or all of them. At the public hearing, the city council may only make changes in, to, or from the boundaries of the proposed property and business improvement district that will exclude territory that will not benefit from the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities. Any modifications, revisions, reductions, or changes to the proposed assessment district shall be reflected in the notice and map recorded pursuant to Section 36627. 36625. Resolution of formation
(a) If the city council, following the public hearing, decides to establish a proposed property and business improvement district, the city council shall adopt a resolution of formation that shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A brief description of the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment will be levied on property, businesses, or both within the district, a statement on whether bonds will be issued, and a description of the exterior boundaries of the proposed district, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The descriptions and statements need not be detailed and shall be sufficient if they enable an owner to generally identify the nature and extent of the improvements, maintenance, and activities and the location and extent of the proposed district. (2) The number, date of adoption, and title of the resolution of intention. (3) The time and place where the public hearing was held concerning the establishment of the district.
(4) A determination regarding any protests received. The city shall not establish the district or levy assessments if a majority protest was received.
(5) A statement that the properties, businesses, or properties and businesses in the district established by the resolution shall be subject to any amendments to this part. (6) A statement that the improvements, maintenance, and activities to be conferred on businesses and properties in the district will be funded by the levy of the assessments. The revenue from the levy of assessments within a district shall not be used to provide improvements, maintenance, or activities outside the district or for any purpose other than the purposes specified in the resolution of intention, as modified by the city council at the hearing concerning establishment of the district.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, improvements and activities that must be provided outside the district boundaries to create a special or specific benefit to the assessed parcels or businesses may be provided, but shall be limited to marketing or signage pointing to the district.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
23 (7) A finding that the property or businesses within the area of the property and business improvement district will be benefited by the improvements, maintenance, and activities funded by the proposed assessments, and, for a property-based district, that property within the district will receive a special benefit.
(8) In a property-based district, the total amount of all special benefits to be conferred on the properties within the property-based district.
(b) The adoption of the resolution of formation and, if required, recordation of the notice and map pursuant to Section 36627 shall constitute the levy of an assessment in each of the fiscal years referred to in the management district plan.
36627. Notice and assessment diagram
Following adoption of the resolution establishing district assessments on properties pursuant to Section 36625, the clerk shall record a notice and an assessment diagram pursuant to Section 3114. No other provision of Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 3100) applies to an assessment district created pursuant to this part. 36628. Establishment of separate benefit zones within district; Categories of businesses The city council may establish one or more separate benefit zones within the district based upon the degree of benefit derived from the improvements or activities to be provided within the benefit zone and may impose a different assessment within each benefit zone. If the assessment is to be levied on businesses, the city council may also define categories of businesses based upon the degree of benefit that each will derive from the improvements or activities to be provided within the district and may impose a different assessment or rate of assessment on each category of business, or on each category of business within each zone. 36628.5. Assessments on businesses or property owners
The city council may levy assessments on businesses or on property owners, or a combination of the two, pursuant to this part. The city council shall structure the assessments in whatever manner it determines corresponds with the distribution of benefits from the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, provided that any propertybased assessment conforms with the requirements set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (k) of Section 36622. 36629. Provisions and procedures applicable to benefit zones and business categories All provisions of this part applicable to the establishment, modification, or disestablishment of a property and business improvement district apply to the establishment, modification, or disestablishment of benefit zones or categories of business. The city council shall, to establish, modify, or disestablish a benefit zone or category of business, follow the procedure to establish, modify, or disestablish a property and business improvement district. 36630. Expiration of district; Creation of new district If a property and business improvement district expires due to the time limit set pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 36622, a new management district plan may be created and the district may be renewed pursuant to this part.

CHAPTER 3. Assessments
36631. Time and manner of collection of assessments; Delinquent payments The collection of the assessments levied pursuant to this part shall be made at the time and in the manner set forth by the city council in the resolution levying the assessment. Assessments levied on real property may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as for the ad valorem property tax, and may provide for the same lien priority and penalties for delinquent payment. All delinquent payments for assessments levied pursuant to this part may be charged interest and penalties.
36632. Assessments to be based on estimated benefit; Classification of real property and businesses; Exclusion of residential and agricultural property

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
24 (a) The assessments levied on real property pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the real property within the property and business improvement district. The city council may classify properties for purposes of determining the benefit to property of the improvements and activities provided pursuant to this part.
(b) Assessments levied on businesses pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the businesses within the property and business improvement district. The city council may classify businesses for purposes of determining the benefit to the businesses of the improvements and activities provided pursuant to this part.
(c) Properties zoned solely for residential use, or that are zoned for agricultural use, are conclusively presumed not to benefit from the improvements and service funded through these assessments, and shall not be subject to any assessment pursuant to this part.
36633. Time for contesting validity of assessment
The validity of an assessment levied under this part shall not be contested in an action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding is commenced within 30 days after the resolution levying the assessment is adopted pursuant to Section 36625. An appeal from a final judgment in an action or proceeding shall be perfected within 30 days after the entry of judgment.
36634. Service contracts authorized to establish levels of city services The city council may execute baseline service contracts that would establish levels of city services that would continue after a property and business improvement district has been formed. 36635. Request to modify management district plan
The owners’ association may, at any time, request that the city council modify the management district plan. Any modification of the management district plan shall be made pursuant to this chapter. 36636. Modification of plan by resolution after public hearing; Adoption of resolution of intention (a) Upon the written request of the owners’ association, the city council may modify the management district plan after conducting one public hearing on the proposed modifications. The city council may modify the improvements and activities to be funded with the revenue derived from the levy of the assessments by adopting a resolution determining to make the modifications after holding a public hearing on the proposed modifications. If the modification includes the levy of a new or increased assessment, the city council shall comply with Section 36623. Notice of all other public hearings pursuant to this section shall comply with both of the following:
(1) The resolution of intention shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city once at least seven days before the public hearing.
(2) A complete copy of the resolution of intention shall be mailed by first class mail, at least 10 days before the public hearing, to each business owner or property owner affected by the proposed modification.
(b) The city council shall adopt a resolution of intention which states the proposed modification prior to the public hearing required by this section. The public hearing shall be held not more than 90 days after the adoption of the resolution of intention. 36637. Reflection of modification in notices recorded and maps Any subsequent modification of the resolution shall be reflected in subsequent notices and maps recorded pursuant to Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 3100), in a manner consistent with the provisions of Section 36627.

CHAPTER 3.5. Financing
36640. Bonds authorized; Procedure; Restriction on reduction or termination of assessments

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
25 (a)The city council may, by resolution, determine and declare that bonds shall be issued to finance the estimated cost of some or all of the proposed improvements described in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, if the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to that section provides for the issuance of bonds, under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10 (commencing with Section 8500)) or in conjunction with Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 (Article 4 (commencing with Section 6584) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code). Either act, as the case may be, shall govern the proceedings relating to the issuance of bonds, although proceedings under the Bond Act of 1915 may be modified by the city council as necessary to accommodate assessments levied upon business pursuant to this part.
(b) The resolution adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall generally describe the proposed improvements specified in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, set forth the estimated cost of those improvements, specify the number of annual installments and the fiscal years during which they are to be collected. The amount of debt service to retire the bonds shall not exceed the amount of revenue estimated to be raised from assessments over 30 years.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, assessments levied to pay the principal and interest on any bond issued pursuant to this section shall not be reduced or terminated if doing so would interfere with the timely retirement of the debt.

CHAPTER 4. Governance
36650. Report by owners’ association; Approval or modification by city council (a) The owners’ association shall cause to be prepared a report for each fiscal year, except the first year, for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvements, maintenance, and activities described in the report. The owners’ association’s first report shall be due after the first year of operation of the district. The report may propose changes, including, but not limited to, the boundaries of the property and business improvement district or any benefit zones within the district, the basis and method of levying the assessments, and any changes in the classification of property, including any categories of business, if a classification is used.
(b) The report shall be filed with the clerk and shall refer to the property and business improvement district by name, specify the fiscal year to which the report applies, and, with respect to that fiscal year, shall contain all of the following information:
(1) Any proposed changes in the boundaries of the property and business improvement district or in any benefit zones or classification of property or businesses within the district. (2) The improvements, maintenance, and activities to be provided for that fiscal year. (3) An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements, maintenance, and activities for that fiscal year.
(4) The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each real property or business owner, as appropriate, to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her property or business for that fiscal year.
(5) The estimated amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year.
(6) The estimated amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied pursuant to this part.
(c) The city council may approve the report as filed by the owners’ association or may modify any particular contained in the report and approve it as modified. Any modification shall be made pursuant to Sections 36635 and 36636.

The city council shall not approve a change in the basis and method of levying assessments that would impair an authorized or executed contract to be paid from the revenues derived from the levy of assessments, including any commitment to pay principal and interest on any bonds issued on behalf of the district. 36651. Designation of owners’ association to provide improvements, maintenance, and activities The management district plan may, but is not required to, state that an owners’ association will provide the improvements, maintenance, and activities described in the management district plan. If the management district plan designates an owners’ association, the city shall contract with the designated nonprofit corporation to provide services.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
26 CHAPTER 5. Renewal
36660. Renewal of district; Transfer or refund of remaining revenues; District term limit (a) Any district previously established whose term has expired, or will expire, may be renewed by following the procedures for establishment as provided in this chapter. (b) Upon renewal, any remaining revenues derived from the levy of assessments, or any revenues derived from the sale of assets acquired with the revenues, shall be transferred to the renewed district. If the renewed district includes additional parcels or businesses not included in the prior district, the remaining revenues shall be spent to benefit only the parcels or businesses in the prior district. If the renewed district does not include parcels or businesses included in the prior district, the remaining revenues attributable to these parcels shall be refunded to the owners of these parcels or businesses. (c) Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 years, or, if the district is authorized to issue bonds, until the maximum maturity of those bonds. There is no requirement that the boundaries, assessments, improvements, or activities of a renewed district be the same as the original or prior district.

CHAPTER 6. Disestablishment
36670. Circumstances permitting disestablishment of district; Procedure (a) Any district established or extended pursuant to the provisions of this part, where there is no indebtedness, outstanding and unpaid, incurred to accomplish any of the purposes of the district, may be disestablished by resolution by the city council in either of the following circumstances:
(1) If the city council finds there has been misappropriation of funds, malfeasance, or a violation of law in connection with the management of the district, it shall notice a hearing on disestablishment. (2) During the operation of the district, there shall be a 30-day period each year in which assessees may request disestablishment of the district. The first such period shall begin one year after the date of establishment of the district and shall continue for 30 days. The next such 30-day period shall begin two years after the date of the establishment of the district. Each successive year of operation of the district shall have such a 30-day period. Upon the written petition of the owners or authorized representatives of real property or the owners or authorized representatives of businesses in the district who pay 50 percent or more of the assessments levied, the city council shall pass a resolution of intention to disestablish the district. The city council shall notice a hearing on disestablishment. (b) The city council shall adopt a resolution of intention to disestablish the district prior to the public hearing required by this section. The resolution shall state the reason for the disestablishment, shall state the time and place of the public hearing, and shall contain a proposal to dispose of any assets acquired with the revenues of the assessments levied within the property and business improvement district. The notice of the hearing on disestablishment required by this section shall be given by mail to the property owner of each parcel or to the owner of each business subject to assessment in the district, as appropriate. The city shall conduct the public hearing not less than 30 days after mailing the notice to the property or business owners. The public hearing shall be held not more than 60 days after the adoption of the resolution of intention. 36671. Refund of remaining revenues upon disestablishment or expiration without renewal of district; Calculation of refund; Use of outstanding revenue collected after disestablishment of district (a) Upon the disestablishment or expiration without renewal of a district, any remaining revenues, after all outstanding debts are paid, derived from the levy of assessments, or derived from the sale of assets acquired with the revenues, or from bond reserve or construction funds, shall be refunded to the owners of the property or businesses then located and operating within the district in which assessments were levied by applying the same method and basis that was used to calculate the assessments levied in the fiscal year in which the district is disestablished or expires. All outstanding assessment revenue collected after disestablishment shall be spent on improvements and activities specified in the management district plan. (b) If the disestablishment occurs before an assessment is levied for the fiscal year, the method and basis that was used to calculate the assessments levied in the immediate prior fiscal year shall be used to calculate the amount of any refund.

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2) PHTID Management District Plan
January 24, 2022
27 APPENDIX 2 – ASSESSED BUSINESSES
Business Name Street Address City
EXTENDED STAY AMERICA 3220 BUSKIRK AVE PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 HILTON HOMEWOOD SUITES 650 ELLINWOOD WAY PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 HYATT HOUSE 2611 CONTRA COSTA BLVD PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 SONESTA SELECT PLEASANT HILL 2250 CONTRA COSTA BLVD PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 PLEASANT HILL INN 1432 CONTRA COSTA BLVD PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 RESIDENCE INN PLEASANT HILL 700 ELLINWOOD WY PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 SUN VALLEY INN 2045 CONTRA COSTA BLVD. PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523

9.9.d
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Exhibit 3 - Owners’ Association Agreement (Stay Pleasant Hill TID Owners Agreement Amendment 2)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 15, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 APPROVING THE FUNDING FOR THE 2023 INTERSECTION AND CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT AND THE USE OF THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT

FUNDS TO PAY FOR THE CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM FOR THE
2023/2024 SCHOOL YEAR

SYNOPSIS
The City conducted a study analyzing the crossing guard program that the City has funded annually since 1995. The study includes proposed infrastructure solutions that will provide permanent safety improvements and remove the need for crossing guards. These proposed improvements will provide increased safety for pedestrians all hours of the day, exceeding the three hours per day of limited weekday coverage during the school year that the current crossing guard program offers. The purpose of this item is to request that City Council approve the request to fund the proposed intersection and crosswalk improvements project, as identified in the study, as well as the crossing guard program for one additional school year (2023/24) using American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds as recommended by the Budget Committee.

DISCUSSION
Background
Since 1995, the City has funded a crossing guard program during each school year at nine intersections throughout the City. Over the past 10 years, this program has incurred costs exceeding $1,000,000. Over the last five years, the average cost increased approximately 12 percent annually including FY 2022/2023 expenditures of $144,780 and projected expenses of $165,191 for FY 2023/2024
Analysis
Historic accident data shows that most accidents in the City occur within intersections and crosswalks. As identified in a study conducted by the City’s consultant, Traffic Patterns (“consultant”), improving intersection safety will reduce vehicular accidents involving pedestrians and bicycles, help the City meet regional Vision Zero goals, and continuously provide safer pedestrian crossings.

10.1 Packet Pg. 231
Crossing guards provide limited benefits, as guards are only present on weekdays during specific times of the day (i.e., during school drop-off and pick-up times) and only during the school year.

Outside these times, pedestrians must cross busy roads and intersections without assistance. In addition, for crossing guards to control traffic, they must first insert themselves into the traffic flow with limited sight visibility of oncoming vehicles. The proposed improvements, such as flashing stop signs and beacons, will provide further advanced visual warnings to motorists of the presence of pedestrians at intersections. Speed humps will provide physical barriers to slow vehicles.

An initial study was conducted in 2021 that analyzed the nine City intersections at which crossing guards are currently deployed. This study was updated in March 2023 by the consultant, which collected additional bicycle and pedestrian counts to guide the selection of appropriately engineered solutions. The vehicle and pedestrian counts collected in the field were compared against the Criteria for Adult Crossing Guards outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), which provides guidance on when crossing guards should be considered. Only four of the nine intersections met the minimum criteria for considering the use of crossing guards. City staff notes that within the CA-MUTCD guidance, crossing guards should be considered when other forms of traffic control are not reasonable or until such time that traffic control measures, such as those proposed in the study, are implemented. The updated study provides recommendations for proposed improvements and additional traffic control measures that would eliminate the need for crossing guards in the future.

After evaluating the intersections, staff developed a strategy for each intersection that would provide varying levels of improvement to augment and emphasize pedestrian safety. These improvements include additional signage and striping, flashing beacon systems, speed humps, and traffic signal improvements. The updated Intersection Improvement Study (attached) further outlines specific enhancements for each intersection. The locations have been prioritized based on the most recent school-age pedestrian count data.

Since the proposed improvements are not expected to be completed before the 2023/24 school year starts, staff requests authorization to appropriately allocate approximately $166,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to continue the crossing guard program for one additional year.

On April 25, 2023, City staff presented the 2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements Project and crossing guards funding proposal to the Budget Committee, which recommended that the City Council consider approval of the proposed engineering solutions and the request to use ARPA funds to pay for crossing guards for one additional year.

FISCAL IMPACT
The following table outlines the estimated cost of improvements proposed for each of the nine prioritized intersections identified in the study.

10.1 Packet Pg. 232
Priority Intersection Name Cost of Proposed
Improvements
1 Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd $100,000
2 Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln $50,000
3 Viking Dr & Ruth Dr $85,000
4 Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln $75,000
5 Gladys Dr & Helen Rd $125,000
6 Viking Dr & Odin Dr + Viking Dr & Morello $125,000
7 Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr $100,000
8 Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave $100,000
9 Gregory Ln & Brandon Rd $40,000
Construction Cost Estimate: Design/Staff: $40,000
Total: $840,000
Funding for the proposed intersection and crosswalk improvements project would be allocated from the following sources:

Measure K unallocated fund balance: $700,000
Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure (M-4): $100,000
Pedestrian and Bicycle Program (MK-3): $ 40,000
Total: $840,000
Funding for the crossing guard program (FY 23/24) would be allocated from the following sources:

American Rescue Plan Act funds: $ 166,000
As noted earlier, the existing crossing guard program has incurred costs of over $1,000,000 the past 10 years, with an average cost increase of 12 percent annually over the past five years. When projecting future costs for the next four years, funding the crossing guard program from FY 2024/2025 through FY 2027/2028 would cost approximately $884,000. The proposed project would pay for itself in less than four years.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Move to approve the request to fund the proposed intersection and crosswalk improvements project, as identified in the study, and authorize the use of ARPA funding to continue the crossing guard program for the 2023/24 school year as recommended by the Budget Committee.

10.1 Packet Pg. 233

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Alternatively, the City Council may choose to reduce the project’s proposed scope and/or remove some of the intersections listed, with the funding adjusted accordingly.

Conversely, City Council may choose not to allocate any additional funding for the proposed intersection improvements or may decline to use ARPA funds for the crossing guard program, and may provide direction to staff on follow-up or recommended changes.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Intersection Improvements Study, dated March 24, 2023 Prepared by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Reviewed by: Ethan Bindernagel, Community Development Director/Assistant City Manager Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

10.1 Packet Pg. 234
RESOLUTION NO. _ -23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL APPROVING THE FUNDING FOR THE 2023 INTERSECTION AND CROSSWALK

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND THE USE OF AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS TO PAY FOR THE CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM FOR THE 2023/2024 SCHOOL YEAR WHEREAS, the City Council had previously directed Engineering staff to investigate and analyze potential engineering and design solutions at the nine intersections where the City currently provides crossing guard services; and
WHEREAS, the City’s traffic consultant, Traffic Patterns (“consultant”), completed a study in March 2023 that provided recommendations for proposed infrastructure solutions that both replace crossing guards and simultaneously provide an ongoing level of improved pedestrian safety year-round that exceeds the three hours of limited weekday coverage that the crossing guard program offers during the school year; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to implement engineering improvements and additional traffic control measures to augment pedestrian safety and eliminate the need for crossing guards, which service the City has provided since 1995 and at a cost in excess of $1,000,000 over the past 10 years alone; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill is one of the only jurisdictions in Contra Costa County that fully funds crossing guard services annually; and WHEREAS, the proposed improvements identified in the consultant’s report are not expected to be complete prior to the start of the 2023/2024 school year, the City wishes to fund the crossing guard program for one additional year using American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds; and
WHEREAS, on April 25, 2023, City staff presented the 2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements Project and crossing guards funding proposal to the Budget Committee, which recommended that the City Council consider approval of the proposed engineering solutions and the request to use ARPA funds to pay for crossing guards for one additional year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that

1. The City Council hereby approves the allocation of funding for the 2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements Project for a total amount not to exceed $840,000 provided from the following sources:
 Measure K unallocated fund balance of $700,000
 Sidewalk Maintenance/ Gap Closure (M-4) of $100,000
 Pedestrian and Bicycle Program (MK-3) of $40,000

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements)

2. The City Council hereby approves the allocation of $166,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to pay for the Crossing Guard Program for one additional year (2023/2024 school year).

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

Juanita Davalos, Acting City Clerk

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net March 24, 2023
Ananthan Kanagasundaram
City of Pleasant Hill
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Subject: Intersection Improvements Study – Adult Crossing Guard Intersections Introduction:

The City of Pleasant Hill – Adult Crossing Guard program includes the deployment nine (9) adult crossing guards at various locations. In 2021 the City conducted a study of the adult crossing guard sites and found at that time that only two (2) of the crossing guard sites satisfy the Adult Crossing Guard criteria suggested by the State of California – Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The Caltrans evaluation criteria focuses on the number of “student-age” pedestrians crossing at an intersection to determine if crossing guard deployment should be considered.

As part of on-going traffic safety improvements, the City requested this study is to identify infrastructure improvements at the nine existing crossing guard sites that can be considered in lieu of crossing guards in efforts to provide permanent site improvements for the community.

The existing adult crossing guard sites in Pleasant Hill are identified in Table 1 along with the existing intersection controls of each site. Intersection controls vary from STOP-controls along the minor street of the intersection, All-Way STOPs, or traffic signal facilities. Each intersection is generally adjacent to or near a public school, see Figure 1 for map location of adult crossing guard sites.

Table 1
Pleasant Hill – Existing Adult Crossing Guard Locations No. Intersection Name Intersection Control Type
1 Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd All-Way STOP
2 Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr Traffic Signal
3 Gladys Dr & Helen Rd All-Way STOP
4 Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave Traffic Signal
5 Gregory Ln & Brandon Rd STOP on Brandon Rd
6 Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln STOP on Wendell Ln
7 Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln STOP on Paradise Ln
8 Viking Dr & Odin Dr STOP on Odin Dr
9 Viking Dr & Ruth Dr All-Way STOP

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 2 Figure 1
Pleasant Hill – Adult Crossing Guard Sites

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 3 Background:

Adult Crossing Guard Evaluation Methodology
The California – Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) published by Caltrans identifies the recommend number of school-age pedestrians that should be actively crossing at a site for at least two hours of the day (40 students for Urban Environments such as Pleasant Hill) compared to the number of vehicles entering the crossing (i.e., 500 at STOP Controlled crossings, 350 at Uncontrolled Crossings, and 300 at Traffic Signals crossings). The two hours do not need to be consecutive.

Traffic Patterns analyzed the nine crossing guard sites in Pleasant Hill in 2021 and again in 2023 to determine which sites satisfy the CA-MUTCD criteria. It should be noted that the Adult Crossing Guard establishment criteria is not a “warrant” that requires an adult crossing guard to be deployed at an intersection if the criteria is satisfied, rather the criteria is meant to provide guidance for when crossing guards can be considered.

Analysis:

The 2021 analysis period occurred in the Fall 2021 (Thursday, October 28th); the analysis at that time aligned with the reentry to in-place learning following the pandemic. The 2023 analysis period occurred in the Spring (Wednesday, March 1, 2023) following the formal end by the federal government of the pandemic. Each analysis analyzed both “School-Age Only” pedestrian volumes (as suggested by the CAMUTCD) and “All Pedestrian” volumes (regardless of age). The findings are provided in Table 2 below.

In 2021 only two intersections satisfied the suggested adult crossing guard criteria, Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd and Viking Dr & Ruth Dr. In 2023 the same two intersections satisfied the suggested criteria along with two additional intersections, Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln and Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln. One additional site, Gladys Dr & Helen Dr, satisfies the criteria only when considering all pedestrians.

The complete 2021 and 2023 intersection evaluation forms for the adult crossing guard review are provided within the Exhibits section of this report.

Table 2
Pleasant Hill – Existing Adult Crossing Guard Establishment Study Findings 2021 and 2023 No. Intersection Name
2021 Study 2023 Study
School Age
Pedestrians
All
Pedestrians
School Age
Pedestrians
All
Pedestrians
1 Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd YES YES YES YES
2 Contra Costa Bl & Ellinwood Dr NO NO NO NO
3 Gladys Dr & Helen Rd NO YES NO YES
4 Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave NO NO NO NO
5 Gregory Ln & Brandon Rd NO NO NO NO
6 Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln NO YES YES YES
7 Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln NO NO YES YES
8 Viking Dr & Odin Dr NO NO NO NO
9 Viking Dr & Ruth Dr YES YES YES YES
Intersections in BOLD satisfy CA-MUTCD Adult Crossing Guard criterion.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 4 Table 3 below provides additional comparison between the 2021 and 2023 data by looking at changes in both total vehicle volumes entering each intersection as well as pedestrian activity.

Table 3
2021 vs 2023 Vehicle and Pedestrian Activity Trends
No. Intersection Name 2021 2023 % Change
Vehicles Student
Peds
Vehicles Student
Peds
Vehicles Student
Peds
1 Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd 676
(701)
103
(164)
634
(647)
104
(158)
- 6%
- 8%
~ 0%
-4 %
2 Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr 1,808
(2,268)
9 (0)
1,485
(2,213)
13 (6)
- 18%
+ 2%
+ 30%
> 100%
3 Gladys Dr & Helen Rd 282
(141)
31 (2)
250
(239)
29 (66)
- 11%
+ 70%
- 6%
> 100%
4 Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave 3,864
(4,632)
6 (11)
4,018
(4,284)
8 (6)
+ 4%
- 7%
+ 33%
- 45%
5 Gregory Ln & Brandon Rd 791
(902)
8 (0)
800
(910)
3 (5)
+ 1%
~ 0%
- 63%
> 100%
6 Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln 548
(487)
30 (5)
550
(711)
50 (61)
~ 0%
+ 46%
+ 67%
> 100%
7 Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln 476
(500)
16 (4)
466
(484)
97 (69)
- 2%
- 3%
> 100%
> 100%
8 Viking Dr & Odin Dr 422
(344)
39 (25)
449
(295)
20 (21)
+ 6%
- 14%
- 50%
- 16%
9 Viking Dr & Ruth Dr 621
(547)
121
(153)
709
(677)
82 (181)
+ 14%
+ 24%
- 32%
+ 18%
- Highest Pedestrian Volume Hour for each AM | (PM) School Commute Period Shown but not consistent from site to site.

Table 3 shows a general consistency in traffic volumes between 2021 and 2023 with volumes changes less than 10%.

In the morning commute period, the highest volume change occured at Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr with a drop in traffic of 323 vehicles (-18%). In the after-school commute period, Viking Dr & Ruth Dr saw the highest increase of 88 vehicles (+24%) but this represents an unnoticeable change of less than 1.5 vehicle per minute.

Pedestrian volume changes between 2021 and 2023 varies by intersection with the highest changes occurring near Pleasant Hill Elementary School at Oak Park Blvd & Wendell (+20 pedestrians in the AM and +46 pedestrians in the PM) and at Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln (+81 pedestrians in the AM and +65 pedestrians in the PM). The Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln crossing also services the private Play + Learn School adjacent to Pleasant Hill Elementary so pedestrian traffic increases may be associated to private school operations.

The subsequent section of this report provides a Tool Kit of permanent infrastructure options that the City can consider providing to offer full-time safety benefits at crossing guard locations.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 5 Infrastructure Improvement Tool Kit
Traffic Patterns recommends a 4-tier improvement strategy for each of the study intersections. Tier 1 improvements provide minor signage & striping improvements. Tier 2 improvements utilize dynamic flashing beacon systems to highlight pedestrian crossings activity at intersections and time-of-day traffic signal timing strategies as signalized intersections along with improved detection strategies. Tier 3 improvements include traffic calming measures such as Speed Humps that utilize roadway deflection to both slow down motorists and to encourage compliance with STOP controls. Tier 4 improvements include major infrastructure improvements such as new traffic signals.

Tier 1 – Minor Signage & Striping Improvements Up to $25,000 Treatment Types Benefits
- High Visibility Yellow
Step-Ladder Crosswalks
- Reflective Markers
along Crosswalk
Periphery
- Green Bike Pathways
through Intersection
- Color or Textured
Intersection Returns
that reduce radius for
vehicles turning through
an intersection
- High Visibility School
Yellow-Green Warning
Signage, Multiple Signs
- 20 MPH School Speed
Zone with Flashers
- STOP Ahead Signage
and Pavement Messages
- Painted Centerlines
approaching Crosswalk
- All-Way STOP
Installations
- Focuses Motorists
Attention on roadway
where pedestriansbicyclists are expected
- Flashing beacon systems
target motorists only
during school
commuter periods of
the day
Limitations
- Dependent on motorists
paying attention to
roadway conditions

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 6 Tier 2 – Dynamic Awareness Elements Up to $35,000
Treatment Benefits
Rectangular Rapid Flashing
Beacon (RRFB)
Various accessories available
including audible push buttons
and crosswalk illuminator light
for nighttime crossings.
- High Visibility LED Flashing Bars
to capture motorist attention
- Low Maintenance and
Operations (Solar Powered)
- Consistent with existing City
equipment
- Can be combined with other
signage & striping treatments
Limitations
- Pedestrians push button
actuation, but passive
detection available
Treatment Benefits
Flashing LED Embedded
STOP Signs
(Activated by Time-of-Day)
Can be supplemented with
Flashing Red Ball indications for
additional visibility.
- High Visibility Red LEDs to
capture motorist attention
- Low Maintenance and
Operations (Solar Powered)
Limitations
- Best for All-Way STOPs
Treatment Benefits
Blank-Out “No Right Turn”
LED Signs
at Traffic Signals
Requires replacement of existing
video detection equipment.

New infrared detection systems
would also monitor crosswalks
to keep No Right Turn signs on
anytime pedestrians are in the
crosswalk during school
commute times.
- Restricts vehicle movements
only on pedestrian-bicycle
presence or by time-of-day
during school commute
periods
Limitations
- Can cause vehicle delays
- Appropriate only at traffic
signal intersections

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 7 Tier 3 – Traffic Calming Treatments Up to $65,000
Speed Humps vary in length
between 8-FT to 12-FT and run
the width of the street
Treatments Benefits
Speed Humps
------------------
Immediately Adjacent to
Crosswalks
- Requires all motorists to slow
down prior to approaching
crosswalk regardless of
bicycle-pedestrian presence
- Reduces Vehicle Speeds
- Builds better compliance with
STOP controls.
- OK for use at “Free Right Turn”
lanes at Traffic Signals
Limitations
- Can generate noise
- Impacts all vehicles including
emergency vehicles
- Not recommended for traffic
signal control crosswalks
Speed Tables vary in length
between 20-FT to 24-FT and
runt the width of the street with
the Top serving as a crosswalk
for pedestrians.

Treatments Benefits
Raised Crosswalk / Speed Table
(Single Crosswalk)
- Requires all motorists to slow
down at crosswalk regardless
of bicycle-pedestrian presence
- Similar benefits to Speed
Humps
Limitations
- May require drainage
accommodations

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 8 Tier 4 – Intersection Controls
Speed Tables vary in cost up to
$250,000
Treatments Benefits
Raised Intersection Table - Best when combined with an
All-Way STOP Intersection
- Reduces all vehicle speeds
entering intersection
Limitations
- May require major drainage
reconstruction
HAWK Traffic Signals vary in cost
up to $500,000
Treatments Benefits
HAWK Traffic Signal - Stops traffic only on
pedestrian-bicycled presence
Limitations
- Newer Technology, not
currently in Pleasant Hill.

Traffic Signals vary in cost up to
$1,000,000
Treatments Benefits
Full Traffic Signal - Best to assign right-of-way
Limitations
- Cost
The following section of this report identifies “minimum” recommended improvements at each of the adult crossing guard crosswalk locations in the City. Additional combinations from the items above can be incorporated pending funding constraints.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 9 Minimum Recommended Intersection Improvements
Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd – Existing Conditions
This intersection met the CA-MUTCD Adult Crossing Guard guidance criteria in both 2021 and 2023. The intersection has existing All-Way STOP controls, but Boyd Rd sees higher traffic volumes (7,200 Vehicle Per Day) with a higher concentration of vehicle traffic during the school commute periods due to the presence of two public schools immediately adjacent to the intersection, Sequoia Elementary School and Sequoia Middle School. Both schools serve as “magnet” schools for the school district attracting students from throughout the County and resulting in higher vehicle trips compared to neighborhood schools that service immediately adjacent households where students are more likely to walk or bike to school.

Figure 1
Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd – Existing Conditions
The intersection was upgraded in 2021 as part of a focused citywide school crossing guard enhancement program. At that time new high-visibility stepladder crosswalk markings were added along with new crosswalks along each of the Sequoia School driveways.

The City receives resident requests for safety improvement at or near the Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd intersection yearly. A five-year collision record study notes two bicycle involved collisions in 2016 and 2017.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 10 Traffic Patterns recommends Tier III – Traffic Calming improvements to better build compliance by motorists with the existing All-Way STOP controls and to reduce vehicle speeds. Options can include Speed Humps at each of the approaches of the intersection immediately in front of marked crosswalks to ensure slower vehicle speeds or immediately before a STOP without a marked crosswalk. The speed humps should be complimented with Dynamic Flashing Red LED STOP signs that flash only during school commute periods of the day and minor signage & striping improvements (i.e., STOP AHEAD roadway markings and signage on Boyd Rd) are also recommended.

Figure 2
Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd – Tier II Options
Cost Estimate: $100,000
Time of Day RED Flash:
7:00AM – 9:00 AM
2:15 PM – 3:30 PM

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 11 Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr
The Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr intersection currently operates with traffic signal controls that include a crosswalk for pedestrians along the north leg of the intersection. The traffic signal services pedestrians traveling from the Ellinwood Dr neighborhood to Gregory Gardens Elementary School just west of the intersection, and to Valley View Middle School and College Park High School to the north.

Pedestrian volumes at this intersection are considered low with approximately a dozen pedestrians during the morning school commute and a half-dozen during the after-school commute. A five-year collision record study notes five crashes each involving bicyclists.

Figure 3
Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr – Proposed Improvements

Traffic Patterns recommends Tier 2 traffic signal modifications that include the installation of Dynamic Blank-Out “No Right Turn” signs to supplement the existing traffic signal controls along with detection upgrades that better monitor crosswalks. During school commute periods, the enhanced detection systems can be used to activate the blank-out signs while pedestrians are crossing the street.

Blank-out signs would be provided for both the northbound approach of Contra Costa Blvd and the westbound Ellinwood Dr approach (4 signs total).

This strategy may require a new traffic signal controller to operate the intersection. New traffic signal controllers will allow for the use of Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) that stops all vehicles for between 5- 7 seconds so that pedestrians may enter the intersection before releasing vehicle traffic, this strategy will benefit the community during all periods of the day.

Cost Estimate: $100,000

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 12 Gladys Dr & Helen Rd
The Gladys Dr & Helen Dr intersection serves as a direct entry point to Strandwood Elementary School located immediately west of the intersection. The intersection operates with an All-Way STOP controls and one crosswalk is provided along the south leg of the intersection.

It is noted that the 2021 and 2023 crossing guard study found the adult crossing guard establishment criteria to be satisfied only when including student and adult pedestrian activity. With the Strandwood Elementary School primary entry being at the terminus of Gladys Dr, there is the potential for higher interaction between vehicle and pedestrian during school commute periods.

Figure 4
Gladys Dr & Helen Rd – Existing vs Conditions
Time of Day RED Flash:
7:00AM – 9:00 AM
2:15 PM – 3:30 PM Cost Estimate: $125,000

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 13 A five-year collision record study notes no documented crashes at the Gladys Dr & Helen Rd intersection.

Both Gladys Dr and Helen Dr are recommended Class III – Neighborhood Bike Routes within the Draft – Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan with the intention of supporting school commute activities.

Traffic Patterns recommends a combination of Tier 1 – Minor Signage & Striping and Tier 3 – Traffic Calming Improvements at the Gladys Dr & Helen Rd intersection.

New High-Visibility Crosswalks
Traffic Patterns recommends providing marked crosswalks for all three intersection approaches given the proximity to Strandwood School. The crosswalks should utilize high-visibility crosswalk markings.

Curb Ramps for Pedestrian Mobility
Six new curb ramps, each connecting to one of the three new crosswalks is also recommended to ensure proper ADA access and mobility for students. The curb ramps should be positioned away from residential driveways.

Speed Humps
Each approach of the Gladys Dr & Helen Rd intersection should provide a speed hump after the limit line STOP to ensure slow vehicle speeds across crosswalks.

Flashing Red LED STOP Signs – School Commute Periods
Flashing STOP Signs should be added that flash red during school commute periods to capture motorist attention to the intersection controls. Traffic Patterns recommends using a Flash Red period of 7:00 AM – 9:00 AM and 2:15 PM – 3:30 PM.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 14 Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave
The Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave intersection serves as a gateway for commercial shopping for Pleasant Hill to both the Downtown and the adjacent Crossroads Shopping Center. The intersection sees some of Pleasant Hills highest traffic volumes with 45,300 daily vehicles on Monument Blvd and 25,800 vehicles on Buskirk Ave due to the proximity to the I-680 ramps.

Both the 2021 and 2023 adult crossing guard studies saw some of the lowest pedestrian volumes of all the crossing guard sites in Pleasant Hill less than a dozen student pedestrian crossings. A five-year collision record study notes ten crash with two bicycle-involved crashes at the intersection.

Figure 6
Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave – Proposed Improvements
Traffic Patterns recommends two infrastructure improvements to the Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave to improve bicycle and pedestrian accessibility. Traffic Patterns recommends similar Tier 2 traffic signal modifications to Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr, blank-out “No Right Turn” signs at each approach with a pedestrian crossing and enhanced detection systems that include crosswalk detection. Signal timing strategies should allow for activation of the “No Right Turn” signs all time during pedestrian activity in the crosswalk at school commute times and Lead Pedestrian Interval use during all other periods of the day.

Cost Estimate: $100,000

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 15 Gregory Lane & Brandon Rd
The Gregory Lane & Brandon Rd intersection was upgraded in 2021 by the City of Pleasant Hill to provide Pedestrian-Activated Flashing Beacon Warning Systems. The system includes three poles with doublesided beacon systems on each side of the crosswalk across Gregory Lane including a third pole in the median island of the intersection. The City also upgraded Brandon Rd in 2022 with a marked Class III – Bicycle Route facility.

The City of Pleasant Hill is actively pursuing grant funding for future streetscape improvements along Gregory Rd that may introduce new traffic patterns and improved bicycle-pedestrian facilities for the community.

Figure 7
Gregory Ln & Brandon Rd – Existing Conditions
Traffic Patterns recommends long-term the installation of a new Tier 4 – Traffic Signal facility in combination with future Complete Streets improvements along Gregory Lane. A new traffic signal will cost up to $1,000,000 and should operate similar to the recently installed traffic signal at Gregory Ln & Elinora Ave with Flashing Yellow Arrow Permissive Left Turn signal phasing.

In the near-term, the recently installed Tier 2 – Flashing Beacon System will suffice given the low number of pedestrians crossings noted at the intersection, but Advanced Flashing Beacon systems should be added on each of the Gregory Lane approaches.

Traffic Patterns also recommends that a similar Tier 2- Flashing Beacon system also be provided at the intersection of Gregory Lane & Khars Avenue.

Flashing Beacon
System Installed by
City at Gregory Ln &
Brandon Rd in 2021
Cost Estimate: $40,000
Advanced Flashing
Beacons on Gregory Lane
Approaches

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 16 Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln and Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln The Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln and Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln intersections are within proximity of one another and both adjacent to Pleasant Hill Elementary School. The intersections are discussed together because of the close spacing and similar roadway conditions.

The City of Pleasant Hill completed Tier 1 – Signage & Striping improvements at each of the crossings in 2021. A five-year crash collision record study of both study intersections notes no documented crash history.

Figure 8
Pleasant Hill Elementary School

Cost Estimate of Improvements: $125,000
Traffic Patterns recommends the following improvements around the Pleasant Hill Elementary School:

Tier 2 – Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln All Way STOP Improvement with Flashing Red STOP Signs ($75,000) At the intersection of Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln provide a new All-Way STOP intersection control that is coupled with Flashing Red STOP signs activated during school commute periods. Supplement the All-Way STOP with speed humps on the Oak Park Blvd approaches.

Tier 2 – All Way STOP Improvement with Flashing Red STOP Signs ($50,000) At the intersection of Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln provide a new All-Way STOP intersection control also coupled with Flashing Red STOP signs activated during school commute periods. The new All-Way STOP would also support slower vehicle speeds approaching the Pleasant Hill Rd & Oak Park Blvd intersection that already operates with an All-Way STOP; flashing Red STOP signs should also be considered at this intersection but are not included the cost estimate.

Pleasant Hill Rd
Oak Park Blvd
Wendell Ln
Paradise Ln

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 17 Viking Dr & Odin Dr
The Viking Dr & Odin Dr intersection is located at the base of a downward curve for traffic traveling east on Viking Dr from Morello Ave. The downward curve can result in slightly higher vehicle speeds. The City completed a traffic calming project on Viking Dr in 2021 that include new vehicle speed feedback signs and plastic bollards to visually and physically reduce lane widths for motorists. Just to the east of the intersection is the Contra Costa Canal Trail so pedestrian activity along Viking Dr can be high throughout the day.

The intersection currently has stop controls on the Odin Dr approaches. Crosswalks across both Viking Dr approaches are also provided.

Figure 9
Viking Dr & Odin Dr – Existing Conditions
A five-year crash collision record study of both study intersections notes one crash in 2019, no bicyclepedestrian impacts.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 18 Traffic Patterns recommends coupling any improvements at Viking Dr & Odin Dr with improvements at Viking Dr & Morello Ave to better support school commute activities and to ensure corridor enhancements that will support both intersections. In the case of Viking Dr & Odin Dr, any field modifications will also impact operations at the Canal Trail Xing.

Figure 10
Viking Dr & Odin Dr – Proposed Improvements
Cost Estimate of Improvements: $125,000
Traffic Patterns recommends the following corridor improvements along Viking Dr.

Tier 1 - All-Way STOPs
Both intersections at Morello Ave & Viking Dr and Viking Dr & Odin Dr should include All Way STOP controls with high-visibility stepladder crosswalk markings. Both locations should also provide Red LED Flashing Stop Signs by Time-of-Day.

Tier 2 – Traffic Calming Speed Humps at Viking Dr & Odin Dr Speed humps should be placed at each approach of the Viking Dr & Odin Dr intersection after the limit line STOP to ensure motorists slow down for pedestrians within the intersection.

Time of Day RED Flash:
7:00AM – 9:00 AM
2:15 PM – 3:30 PM

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 19 Viking Dr & Ruth Dr
The Viking Dr & Ruth Dr is one of the two intersections in both 2021 and 2023 that satisfied the adult crossing guard suggested criteria on student-age pedestrian activity alone. Given the proximity of the intersection to Diablo Valley College, College Park High School, and Valley View Middle School this is not unexpected.

The intersection currently has an All-Way STOP control but there is a horizontal curve in the roadway west of the intersection that can limit intersection visibility as motorists travel east towards the intersection from the schools. The intersection also lacks high-visibility crosswalk markings that demand more attention of motorists and large trees in the area provide shade that limits the visibility of crosswalk markings.

Figure 11
Viking Dr & Ruth Dr – Existing Conditions
A five-year crash collision record study of both study intersections notes one crash in 2016, no bicyclepedestrian impacts.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 20 Figure 12
Viking Dr & Ruth Dr – Proposed Improvements
Cost Estimate of Improvements: $85,000
Traffic Patterns recommends relatively minor improvements at the Viking Dr & Ruth Dr intersection, including:

Tier 1 - High-Visibility Crosswalk Markings and Flashing LED STOP Signs Replace the existing parallel bar crosswalks that are fading with step-ladder crosswalk markings.

Supplement the existing All-Way STOP with Time-of-Day Flashing LED Stops during school commute periods of the day.

Tier 3 – Traffic Calming Speed Humps along Viking Dr
Provide speed humps at each intersection approach to reduce vehicle speeds and to build compliance with the STOP controls.

Time of Day RED Flash:
7:00AM – 9:00 AM
2:15 PM – 3:30 PM

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) To: Ananthan Kanagasundaram
Subject: Pleasant Hill – Intersection Improvement Study – Adult Crossing Guard Locations Date: March 24, 2023
Page:

Traffic Patterns Ÿ 169 Front Street, Suite 203Ÿ Danville, CA 94566 Ÿ (408) 916-8141 Ÿ www.trafficpatterns.net 21 The total cost of proposed improvement for the nine existing adult crossing guard intersections in Pleasant Hill are provided in Table 4. The proposed improvement will provide better safety conditions for the Pleasant Hill community than limited time-of-day crossing operations along.

Table 4
Pleasant Hill – Existing Adult Crossing Guard Locations No. Intersection Name Cost of Proposed
Improvements
1 Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd $100,000
2 Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr $100,000
3 Gladys Dr & Helen Rd $125,000
4 Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave $100,000
5 Gregory Ln & Brandon Rd $40,000
6 Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln $75,000
7 Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln 50,000
8 Viking Dr & Odin Dr $125,000
9 Viking Dr & Ruth Dr $85,000
Budgetary Cost Estimate: $800,000
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at (408) 916-8141.

Sincerely,

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Exhibit A
2023 Adult Crossing Guard
Data Analysis Forms

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection & Analysis Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 8 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 6 0 0 0 15 11 0 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 4 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 23 11 0 1 0 14 19 0 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 14 0 31 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 49 19 0 0 0 34 29 0 1 2 1 7:45 - 7:59 40 0 28 20 10 14 0 0 0 18 8 0 0 48 19 2 0 1 29 41 0 37 11 17 Hour Totals: 66 0 93 20 13 15 0 0 0 18 13 0 0 129 55 2 1 1 92 100 0 38 13 18 8:00 - 8:14 21 0 33 22 11 12 0 0 0 21 24 0 0 33 20 9 5 6 48 45 0 40 25 17 8:15 - 8:29 14 0 20 5 6 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 23 19 0 0 0 38 24 0 5 8 3 8:30 - 8:44 8 0 21 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 26 0 0 0 27 21 0 0 2 0 8:45 - 8:59 18 0 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 18 0 0 0 28 26 0 0 1 0 Hour Totals: 61 0 99 27 19 13 0 0 0 23 27 0 0 134 83 9 5 6 141 116 0 45 36 20 PM
12:30 - 12:44 19 0 28 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 30 8 0 0 0 37 30 0 0 0 0 12:45 - 12:59 12 0 31 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 42 13 0 0 0 21 27 0 0 2 0 1:00 - 1:14 17 0 34 6 4 0 0 0 0 7 3 0 0 43 27 0 0 0 34 40 0 12 4 0 1:15 - 1:29 18 0 22 2 3 2 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 26 9 0 0 0 38 29 0 3 3 2 Hour Totals: 66 0 115 8 9 2 0 0 0 12 11 0 0 141 57 0 0 0 130 126 0 15 9 2 1:30 - 1:44 26 0 43 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 29 9 0 2 0 25 19 0 2 12 7 1:45 - 1:59 21 0 27 40 19 13 0 0 0 48 25 0 0 43 11 2 3 2 43 37 0 59 28 14 2:00 - 2:14 10 0 37 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 25 13 0 0 0 25 20 0 1 1 0 2:15 - 2:29 15 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 29 24 0 0 0 39 35 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 72 0 149 40 23 17 0 0 0 54 32 0 0 126 57 2 5 2 132 111 0 62 41 21 2:30 - 2:44 40 0 48 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 22 20 0 0 0 26 23 0 2 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 18 0 30 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 36 10 0 0 0 30 45 0 6 4 0 3:00 - 3:14 26 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 38 13 0 0 0 30 28 0 1 1 0 3:15 - 3:29 35 0 36 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 36 17 0 0 0 21 32 0 1 0 0 Hour Totals: 119 0 156 3 4 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 132 60 0 0 0 107 128 0 10 5 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 535 78 40 Yes 118 Yes STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 634 104 87 Yes 191 Yes STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 635 35 29 No 64 Yes Traffic Signal Hour 4 647 158 101 Yes 259 Yes
Hour 5 702 17 17 No 34 No
PM
181 17 0 23 198
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
All Peds
Satisfied
YES
AM
243 103
51 257 81
Westbound
192
0 256 24
0 Pleasant Hill
3/1/23
Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd STOP (All-Way)
Urban
YES
160 46 0 50
0 31
14 Eastbound
217
184 3
235 15
221 63 0 86 183 7
275 7 0 12 192
Period
159 33
Northbound Southbound

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 0 60 13 0 0 0 31 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 33 0 1 0 7:15 - 7:29 0 76 15 0 0 0 42 106 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 30 1 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 0 111 16 0 0 0 38 190 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 72 5 1 0 7:45 - 7:59 0 120 19 0 0 0 59 237 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 40 1 3 0 Hour Totals: 0 367 63 0 0 0 170 614 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 175 7 5 0 8:00 - 8:14 0 177 22 0 0 0 52 197 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 51 0 2 0 8:15 - 8:29 0 130 22 0 0 0 46 235 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 37 0 1 0 8:30 - 8:44 0 119 16 0 0 0 41 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 0 1 0 8:45 - 8:59 0 105 15 0 0 0 39 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 35 0 1 0 Hour Totals: 0 531 75 0 0 0 178 823 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 156 0 5 0 PM
12:30 - 12:44 0 212 22 0 0 0 41 209 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 49 0 1 0 12:45 - 12:59 0 263 18 0 0 0 39 194 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 38 2 2 0 1:00 - 1:14 0 206 26 0 0 0 31 183 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 26 0 41 0 2 0 1:15 - 1:29 0 264 24 0 0 0 37 185 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 22 0 37 1 6 0 Hour Totals: 0 945 90 0 0 0 148 771 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 94 0 165 3 11 0 1:30 - 1:44 0 262 17 0 0 0 35 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 41 1 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 0 242 24 0 0 0 23 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 31 0 38 2 1 0 2:00 - 2:14 0 254 28 0 0 0 26 139 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 28 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 0 200 31 0 0 0 35 209 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 21 0 44 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 0 958 100 0 0 0 119 629 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 97 0 151 3 1 0 2:30 - 2:44 0 217 22 0 0 0 22 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 33 1 1 0 2:45 - 2:59 0 244 35 0 0 0 31 162 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 30 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 0 246 25 0 0 0 31 136 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 25 0 53 2 3 0 3:15 - 3:29 0 256 30 0 0 0 45 154 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 15 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 0 963 112 0 0 0 129 618 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 68 0 131 3 4 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 1485 13 7 No 20 No STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 1857 1 8 No 9 No STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 2213 6 20 No 26 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 2054 3 6 No 9 No
Hour 5 2021 4 9 No 13 No
14 PM
199 7
3 School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
0 748 2 0
259
Period
430 0
Northbound Southbound
250 5
Westbound
271
Eastbound
0 0 0
All Peds
Satisfied
AM
Pleasant Hill
3/1/23
0 1035 0 919 8 0 4
NO
248 4
12 0
Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr Traffic Signal
Urban
3 606 0 1001 4
784 8
1075 0
NO
747 3
1058

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 21 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 20 5 0 0 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 42 0 16 18 14 10 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 6 40 0 0 0 26 29 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 79 0 37 18 14 10 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 6 60 0 0 0 62 35 0 0 0 0 8:00 - 8:14 33 0 27 15 26 8 0 0 0 14 17 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 27 23 0 0 0 0 8:15 - 8:29 6 0 15 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 20 7 0 0 1 0 8:30 - 8:44 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 44 0 50 15 34 8 0 0 0 14 19 0 0 6 35 0 0 0 84 31 0 0 1 0 PM
12:30 - 12:44 21 0 13 1 6 4 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 1 0 12:45 - 12:59 15 0 9 21 17 11 0 0 0 14 11 0 8 36 0 0 1 0 14 11 0 0 0 0 1:00 - 1:14 8 0 11 14 7 5 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 4 23 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 0 0 1:15 - 1:29 1 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 45 0 40 37 30 20 0 0 0 29 20 0 8 41 36 0 1 0 40 29 0 0 1 0 1:30 - 1:44 7 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 11 2 0 0 1 0 1:45 - 1:59 11 0 13 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 5 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 12 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 28 0 34 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 10 30 0 0 0 40 8 0 0 1 0 2:30 - 2:44 0 0 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 12 2 0 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 3 0 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 16 5 0 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 6 0 18 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 3 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 12 0 50 3 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 17 21 0 0 0 64 8 0 0 0 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 279 23 18 No 41 No STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 250 29 54 No 83 Yes STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 239 66 52 Yes 118 Yes Traffic Signal Hour 4 150 3 11 No 14 No
Hour 5 173 4 5 No 9 No
Pleasant Hill
3/1/23
Gladys Dr & Helen Rd STOP (All-Way)
Urban
NO
0 115 1
1 69 1
Westbound
97 Eastbound
YES
66 0 0
72 0
62 8 0 5 40 0
62 7 0 2 39 0
48 1
94 49 0 33 41
Period
116 32
Northbound Southbound
0 9
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
All Peds
Satisfied
AM PM
85 67 0 49 85

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 2 1 2 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 39 1 0 0 0 1 47 2 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 1 1 9 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 49 1 1 0 0 5 66 0 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 3 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 1 80 0 0 0 0 4 77 4 0 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 6 10 14 1 2 2 7 1 7 0 1 0 11 139 20 1 0 2 10 150 7 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 12 12 31 1 2 2 15 6 10 0 1 0 12 307 22 2 0 2 20 340 13 0 0 0 8:00 - 8:14 4 4 16 0 2 2 13 3 10 0 0 0 1 120 4 0 1 0 7 112 8 0 0 0 8:15 - 8:29 3 1 5 0 0 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 1 91 7 0 1 0 4 90 0 0 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 97 3 0 1 0 3 82 2 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 81 8 0 1 0 5 100 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 7 5 24 0 3 2 19 4 14 0 3 0 4 389 22 0 4 0 19 384 11 0 0 0 PM
12:30 - 12:44 2 3 4 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 1 0 3 99 2 0 0 0 3 76 4 0 0 0 12:45 - 12:59 3 5 4 4 4 4 8 5 6 0 0 0 4 97 3 1 1 1 2 120 11 0 0 0 1:00 - 1:14 6 0 7 0 0 0 6 2 2 0 1 0 3 88 4 0 0 0 4 107 1 0 0 0 1:15 - 1:29 1 1 2 0 3 0 2 2 1 0 4 0 2 89 5 0 0 0 1 103 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 12 9 17 4 8 4 18 9 13 0 6 0 12 373 14 1 1 1 10 406 17 0 0 0 1:30 - 1:44 0 1 5 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 91 2 0 0 0 3 88 4 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 2 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 1 95 0 0 0 0 5 118 1 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 86 3 0 0 0 4 99 1 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 2 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 98 2 0 0 0 4 97 2 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 5 1 11 1 4 0 7 2 6 0 4 0 5 370 7 0 0 0 16 402 8 0 0 0 2:30 - 2:44 1 1 3 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 81 2 1 0 0 4 102 2 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 2 2 6 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 86 6 0 0 0 6 101 1 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 81 4 0 0 0 5 115 5 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 3 0 3 3 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 100 6 0 0 0 4 139 2 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 10 3 22 3 6 0 4 1 11 0 2 0 9 348 18 1 0 0 19 457 10 0 0 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 800 3 3 No 6 No STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 902 0 10 No 10 No STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 910 5 15 No 20 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 840 1 8 No 9 No
Hour 5 912 4 8 No 12 No
486 0
17 5 15 4 382 0
16 2
Period
55 3
Northbound Southbound
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
NO
426 0
0 4 414 0
Westbound
373
Eastbound
415
341 2
All Peds
Satisfied
Pleasant Hill
3/1/23
399 2
375
12 40 6
NO
38 AM
433 0
PM
Gregory Ln & Brandon Rd STOP (Minor)
Urban
1 36 3 37 3
31 1
35 9

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 60 0 9 0 1 0 1 2 19 0 0 0 4 113 124 0 0 0 21 310 2 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 69 1 11 0 1 0 1 0 16 0 0 0 1 115 202 0 0 0 25 413 3 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 97 1 8 0 0 0 2 6 21 2 2 0 3 170 269 0 0 0 41 457 1 1 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 88 1 20 2 0 0 8 11 20 0 0 0 7 185 255 0 0 0 45 408 4 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 314 3 48 2 2 0 12 19 76 2 2 0 15 583 850 0 0 0 132 1588 10 1 0 0 8:00 - 8:14 113 5 29 1 2 0 1 4 9 1 0 0 7 220 245 0 0 0 48 421 4 1 1 0 8:15 - 8:29 129 4 15 1 0 0 4 10 9 0 0 0 11 182 241 0 0 0 49 340 2 0 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 95 3 14 1 1 0 2 6 12 0 0 0 7 195 229 0 0 0 59 336 4 1 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 90 1 16 2 0 0 2 2 6 0 0 0 5 253 233 0 0 0 39 305 2 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 427 13 74 5 3 0 9 22 36 1 0 0 30 850 948 0 0 0 195 1402 12 2 1 0 PM
12:30 - 12:44 174 1 53 0 0 0 3 2 8 0 0 0 6 273 215 0 0 0 53 293 4 0 0 0 12:45 - 12:59 162 1 34 0 2 0 3 1 11 1 1 0 12 291 203 0 0 0 46 287 1 0 1 0 1:00 - 1:14 164 1 60 0 3 0 2 1 8 0 1 0 2 312 221 0 0 0 34 276 0 0 1 0 1:15 - 1:29 176 4 39 0 0 0 3 3 6 1 0 0 8 296 227 0 0 0 39 256 2 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 676 7 186 0 5 0 11 7 33 2 2 0 28 1172 866 0 0 0 172 1112 7 0 2 0 1:30 - 1:44 149 2 51 1 2 0 1 4 6 0 0 0 9 290 214 0 0 0 46 303 4 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 148 2 45 0 1 0 1 2 9 0 0 0 13 305 215 0 0 0 42 261 1 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 188 1 41 2 3 0 2 1 9 1 0 0 12 300 236 0 0 0 39 264 1 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 173 5 58 0 1 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 16 282 201 0 0 0 44 271 3 2 2 0 Hour Totals: 658 10 195 3 7 0 4 12 33 1 0 0 50 1177 866 0 0 0 171 1099 9 2 2 0 2:30 - 2:44 148 5 57 2 1 0 2 3 6 0 0 0 10 315 234 0 0 0 43 265 2 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 185 5 45 0 3 0 3 3 7 0 0 0 8 328 238 0 0 0 33 268 3 1 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 209 5 52 0 2 0 1 6 9 0 1 0 6 283 199 0 0 0 32 199 2 0 4 0 3:15 - 3:29 155 2 55 0 0 0 3 2 4 0 0 0 14 367 166 0 0 0 37 279 0 0 2 0 Hour Totals: 697 17 209 2 6 0 9 14 26 0 1 0 38 1293 837 0 0 0 145 1011 7 1 6 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 3650 5 4 No 9 No STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 4018 8 4 No 12 No STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 4277 2 9 No 11 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 4284 6 9 No 15 No
Hour 5 4303 3 13 No 16 No
Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave Traffic Signal
Urban
0 514 8 67 1
107 4
923 8
NO
49 1
863
All Peds
Satisfied
AM
Pleasant Hill
3/1/23
2168
869 5 51 4 2066 0
NO
1279 4
1 0 1609 3
Westbound
1730
Eastbound
1828
1448 0
Period
365 4
Northbound Southbound
10 49 1 2093
1291 2
PM
1163 7
0 School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 1 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 3 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 1 0 0 0 2 35 0 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 2 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 1 0 0 0 5 61 1 1 1 1 7:45 - 7:59 1 0 15 25 17 0 0 0 3 6 7 3 1 106 5 0 0 0 30 77 3 17 12 10 Hour Totals: 6 1 21 26 25 0 1 0 3 6 7 3 1 286 8 0 0 0 38 181 4 18 13 11 8:00 - 8:14 7 0 40 9 30 0 1 0 4 1 9 0 4 135 1 0 0 0 30 111 4 9 21 14 8:15 - 8:29 7 0 27 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 103 0 0 0 0 1 55 0 0 3 0 8:30 - 8:44 2 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 1 58 1 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 1 0 2 0 1 48 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 16 0 71 9 44 0 1 0 4 1 14 0 5 411 2 0 2 0 33 272 5 9 24 14 PM
12:30 - 12:44 1 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 50 7 0 0 0 20 71 4 0 2 0 12:45 - 12:59 2 0 2 1 7 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 50 6 0 1 0 33 71 4 0 4 5 1:00 - 1:14 9 0 31 21 10 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 71 3 0 0 0 10 77 3 14 4 7 1:15 - 1:29 9 0 27 12 5 0 1 0 1 3 5 0 0 78 1 0 0 0 3 58 0 6 2 1 Hour Totals: 21 0 64 34 28 0 2 0 4 7 14 0 0 249 17 0 1 0 66 277 11 20 12 13 1:30 - 1:44 4 0 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 45 0 0 0 0 1 57 1 1 1 0 1:45 - 1:59 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 2 50 2 0 1 0 2:00 - 2:14 2 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 65 1 0 0 0 1 65 0 2 4 0 2:15 - 2:29 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 69 1 0 3 0 5 47 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 10 0 21 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 2 225 2 0 3 0 9 219 3 3 6 0 2:30 - 2:44 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 60 0 0 1 0 1 68 1 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 3 0 11 0 3 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 54 4 0 2 0 11 73 0 2 1 0 3:00 - 3:14 10 0 9 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 56 3 0 0 0 6 73 0 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 3 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 2 1 0 0 6 62 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 17 0 27 3 8 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 3 235 9 1 3 0 24 276 1 2 1 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 550 50 45 Yes 95 Yes STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 820 19 84 No 103 Yes STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 711 61 55 Yes 116 Yes Traffic Signal Hour 4 492 3 20 No 23 No
Hour 5 596 8 14 No 22 No
AM
354 32
PM
Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln STOP (Minor)
Urban
4 87 53 5 15
4 13
44 11
Pleasant Hill
3/1/23
266 1
247
62 6 21
YES
85 School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
YES
231 9
31 2 310 33
Westbound
223
Eastbound
418
295 0
All Peds
Satisfied
Period
28 51
Northbound Southbound
301 3
31 5 1 6 229 3
4 4

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 1 30 0 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 0 0 2 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 1 43 0 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 0 0 3 7 8 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 41 0 1 1 0 4 80 0 0 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 0 0 5 57 30 0 2 0 2 6 4 0 3 95 2 22 12 12 6 96 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 0 0 10 68 44 0 3 0 4 6 6 0 4 181 2 23 13 12 12 249 1 0 0 0 8:00 - 8:14 0 0 3 19 49 0 0 0 4 6 12 0 2 63 1 9 25 13 2 84 4 0 0 0 8:15 - 8:29 0 0 7 7 17 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 45 1 0 2 0 5 94 0 0 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 0 0 4 2 11 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 0 44 0 1 1 0 3 74 0 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 0 0 3 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 54 0 0 2 0 3 74 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 0 0 17 31 89 0 4 0 7 6 22 0 3 206 2 10 30 13 13 326 4 0 0 0 PM
12:30 - 12:44 0 0 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 67 0 0 2 0 0 51 3 0 0 0 12:45 - 12:59 0 0 0 5 14 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 2 71 1 3 10 17 1 62 0 0 0 0 1:00 - 1:14 2 0 1 28 17 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 47 1 11 6 8 1 53 0 0 0 0 1:15 - 1:29 1 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 48 0 7 0 4 0 67 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 3 0 2 46 37 0 1 0 3 2 8 0 2 233 2 21 18 29 2 233 3 0 0 0 1:30 - 1:44 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 1 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 44 1 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 60 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 63 0 1 1 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 0 0 0 2 8 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 2 251 0 1 2 0 0 208 1 0 0 0 2:30 - 2:44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 60 0 0 1 0 1 58 1 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 0 0 2 5 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 83 0 1 1 0 4 56 0 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 0 0 4 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 90 1 0 0 0 4 56 2 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 0 0 7 9 20 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 3 291 1 1 2 0 9 226 3 0 0 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 466 97 63 Yes 160 Yes STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 582 47 141 Yes 188 Yes STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 484 69 63 Yes 132 Yes Traffic Signal Hour 4 465 7 10 No 17 No
Hour 5 541 11 26 No 37 No
AM
Pleasant Hill
3/1/23
School
Peds
Satisfied
5 83 4 10 237 39 238 0
YES
YES
209 0
PM
Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln STOP (Minor)
Urban
3 17 120 11 28
7 12
7 29 1 5 295
40 343 0
Westbound
262
Eastbound
211
187 36
All Peds
Satisfied
Period
10 112
Northbound Southbound
238 0
0 10 3 4 253 3
All Peds
Total
0 10.1.b
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 1 16 1 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 0 0 0 5 0 2 10 0 3 0 0 0 8 40 0 5 0 2 0 27 10 0 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 0 1 2 0 1 1 7 0 12 0 1 1 51 83 1 2 3 3 2 25 51 0 7 4 Hour Totals: 0 1 2 5 1 3 22 0 19 0 2 1 59 145 2 7 3 5 3 77 63 0 7 4 8:00 - 8:14 0 1 3 9 1 3 16 3 41 0 0 0 24 101 1 9 0 3 1 29 22 0 1 2 8:15 - 8:29 0 1 1 0 3 1 3 1 15 0 1 0 2 49 2 0 0 0 0 35 1 2 0 1 8:30 - 8:44 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 1 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 28 3 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 22 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 0 2 4 9 6 4 22 4 64 0 2 0 28 194 3 9 0 3 1 100 27 2 1 3 PM
12:30 - 12:44 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 1 3 0 0 10 30 0 0 0 0 0 33 12 0 0 0 12:45 - 12:59 0 1 2 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 1 0 18 13 1 0 1 1 2 25 14 4 2 2 1:00 - 1:14 1 0 1 1 0 1 30 1 31 2 0 1 9 17 0 2 2 2 0 25 9 2 1 1 1:15 - 1:29 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 6 0 0 0 3 13 0 0 0 0 1 17 3 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 1 1 4 1 0 1 47 3 45 5 1 1 40 73 1 2 3 3 3 100 38 6 3 3 1:30 - 1:44 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 1 17 4 0 1 0 1:45 - 1:59 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 5 18 0 0 0 0 0 17 9 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 0 0 2 0 1 0 10 2 4 2 0 0 2 33 0 0 0 0 0 33 4 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 1 0 2 4 3 0 7 1 3 2 0 0 4 34 0 2 2 0 1 55 3 5 0 0 Hour Totals: 1 0 8 4 4 0 23 3 8 4 1 0 12 95 0 2 2 0 2 122 20 5 1 0 2:30 - 2:44 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 4 4 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 0 0 29 2 5 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 1 25 0 0 0 0 1 14 2 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 35 1 0 0 0 0 18 4 1 1 0 3:15 - 3:29 0 0 1 2 0 0 5 0 2 4 0 0 1 54 0 0 0 0 1 54 4 1 0 0 Hour Totals: 1 0 5 6 1 0 15 0 7 8 2 0 11 126 1 0 0 0 2 115 12 7 1 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 393 12 13 No 25 No STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 449 20 9 No 29 No STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 356 14 7 No 21 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 294 15 8 No 23 No
Hour 5 295 21 4 No 25 No
PM AM
Pleasant Hill
3/1/23
Viking Dr & Odin Dr STOP (Minor)
Urban
0 6 15 90 2
41 2
6 1
144 6
7 9 128 3
5 141 9
Westbound
143
Eastbound
225
206 10
NO
NO
6 7 22 10 138
95 6 114
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
All Peds
Satisfied
Period
3 6
Northbound Southbound
129 8
9 8 34 5 107 4

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 1 0 1 22 1 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 4 2 0 3 0 0 3 3 15 1 0 0 4 30 2 2 0 0 0 52 1 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 17 4 8 6 0 0 8 23 34 4 0 3 15 71 8 20 0 6 5 94 0 0 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 10 11 13 15 0 0 8 13 45 3 0 3 17 61 8 26 0 9 5 66 1 1 0 0 Hour Totals: 32 21 22 25 0 0 19 40 102 8 0 6 36 170 19 48 1 15 11 234 3 1 0 0 8:00 - 8:14 16 7 3 10 3 0 5 3 47 1 0 0 23 94 13 5 0 0 1 77 2 0 1 0 8:15 - 8:29 34 2 10 12 1 0 0 3 51 2 0 0 18 79 17 1 0 0 5 86 1 0 1 0 8:30 - 8:44 6 2 1 3 0 0 3 1 10 0 0 0 10 68 11 1 0 0 0 57 3 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 5 2 1 0 6 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 1 16 1 2 1 0 0 53 3 0 1 0 Hour Totals: 61 13 15 25 10 0 8 9 114 3 0 0 52 257 42 9 1 0 6 273 9 0 3 0 PM
12:30 - 12:44 5 8 1 1 0 0 1 3 5 1 0 0 3 110 2 1 2 0 2 118 1 0 0 0 12:45 - 12:59 2 5 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 3 87 3 3 1 0 1 59 2 1 0 0 1:00 - 1:14 3 5 2 0 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 6 44 2 0 0 0 0 35 1 0 0 0 1:15 - 1:29 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 4 10 1 0 0 4 27 2 0 1 0 0 23 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 11 21 5 2 2 0 6 11 19 2 0 0 16 268 9 4 4 0 3 235 5 1 0 0 1:30 - 1:44 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 0 3 44 3 0 0 0 2 42 3 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 1 3 1 1 0 0 2 1 10 1 0 0 5 44 2 4 7 0 1 60 3 0 1 0 2:00 - 2:14 2 2 2 2 2 0 5 3 5 0 1 0 4 96 3 0 1 0 6 60 7 0 4 0 2:15 - 2:29 5 4 18 52 0 0 17 9 10 42 0 0 5 92 1 78 1 14 6 59 11 1 3 0 Hour Totals: 11 11 21 55 2 0 27 14 31 43 1 0 17 276 9 82 9 14 15 221 24 1 8 0 2:30 - 2:44 6 5 4 11 0 0 1 5 10 0 0 0 14 79 11 3 0 0 2 50 2 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 6 3 8 3 2 0 3 3 11 0 1 0 8 62 5 0 1 0 3 58 2 0 1 0 3:00 - 3:14 4 3 2 1 1 0 1 1 13 1 0 0 1 32 4 0 0 0 5 52 3 0 2 0 3:15 - 3:29 4 4 14 67 3 0 12 4 12 14 0 0 9 73 10 68 0 0 6 58 6 1 2 0 Hour Totals: 20 15 28 82 6 0 17 13 46 15 1 0 32 246 30 71 1 0 16 218 13 1 5 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 709 82 1 Yes 83 Yes STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 859 37 14 No 51 Yes STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 609 9 6 No 15 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 677 181 20 Yes 201 Yes
Hour 5 694 169 13 Yes 182 Yes
243 1
PM
37 4 36 2 293
63 88 76 16
43 57 72 44
89 35 131 3
161 8
Pleasant Hill
3/1/23
Viking Dr / Ruth Dr STOP (All-Way)
Urban
351
225 49
AM
72 10
8 308
302
Period
75 25
Northbound Southbound
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
All Peds
Satisfied
YES
YES
1 247 6
91 260 9
288 3
Westbound
248
Eastbound

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Exhibit B
2021 Adult Crossing Guard
Data Analysis Forms

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 3 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 7 0 0 0 20 11 0 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 7 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10 0 0 0 20 14 0 1 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 15 0 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 21 0 0 0 26 29 0 5 4 1 7:45 - 7:59 34 0 26 25 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 27 0 0 0 35 45 0 46 9 9 Hour Totals: 59 0 80 26 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 65 0 0 0 101 99 0 52 13 10 8:00 - 8:14 23 0 23 39 32 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 19 3 0 0 43 57 0 50 47 8 8:15 - 8:29 21 0 27 5 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 24 0 0 0 40 35 0 5 11 2 8:30 - 8:44 16 0 19 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 22 0 0 0 27 19 0 1 1 0 8:45 - 8:59 13 0 24 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 27 0 0 0 36 25 0 0 2 0 Hour Totals: 73 0 93 44 43 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 92 3 0 0 146 136 0 56 61 10 PM
1:30 - 1:44 29 0 32 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 17 1 0 0 29 37 0 2 17 7 1:45 - 1:59 17 0 28 56 50 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 20 1 0 0 31 42 0 81 73 10 2:00 - 2:14 15 0 44 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 21 0 0 0 31 42 0 12 7 5 2:15 - 2:29 10 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 17 0 0 0 27 21 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 71 0 141 67 63 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 75 2 0 0 118 142 0 95 97 22 2:30 - 2:44 30 0 40 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 18 0 0 0 14 18 0 11 5 0 2:45 - 2:59 29 0 34 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 16 0 0 0 41 40 0 19 5 0 3:00 - 3:14 30 0 36 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 22 0 0 0 20 24 0 6 3 0 3:15 - 3:29 32 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 27 0 0 0 27 16 0 1 1 0 Hour Totals: 121 0 143 28 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 83 0 0 0 102 98 0 37 14 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 528 78 22 Yes 100 Yes STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 676 103 104 Yes 207 Yes STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 701 164 160 Yes 324 Yes Traffic Signal Hour 4 687 65 27 Yes 92 Yes
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
All Peds
Satisfied
YES
AM
260 192
65 282 117
Westbound
200
PM
Pleasant Hill
10/28/21
Boyd Rd & Patterson Blvd STOP (All-Way)
Urban
0 166 87 0 0
0 0
YES
3 Eastbound
228
189 0
200 51
212 130 0 0 229 2
264 41 0 0 223
Period
139 35
Northbound Southbound

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 0 49 3 0 0 0 23 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 32 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 0 89 12 0 0 0 28 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 44 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 0 112 12 0 0 0 33 186 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 57 3 2 0 7:45 - 7:59 0 135 27 0 0 0 53 251 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 51 1 0 1 Hour Totals: 0 385 54 0 0 0 137 644 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 184 4 2 1 8:00 - 8:14 0 168 23 0 0 0 45 227 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 35 1 0 0 8:15 - 8:29 0 124 14 0 0 0 52 235 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 37 0 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 0 109 15 0 0 0 36 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 33 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 0 108 16 0 0 0 31 175 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 26 0 1 0 Hour Totals: 0 509 68 0 0 0 164 855 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 131 1 1 0 PM
1:30 - 1:44 0 229 30 0 0 0 39 171 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 51 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 0 247 18 0 0 0 41 186 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 22 0 2 0 2:00 - 2:14 0 252 21 0 0 0 51 181 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 36 0 1 0 2:15 - 2:29 0 254 23 0 0 0 32 189 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 36 0 1 0 Hour Totals: 0 982 92 0 0 0 163 727 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 145 0 4 0 2:30 - 2:44 0 210 33 0 1 0 43 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 38 0 1 0 2:45 - 2:59 0 292 34 0 0 0 40 135 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 50 0 4 0 3:00 - 3:14 0 271 29 0 0 0 48 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 40 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 0 265 17 0 0 0 44 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 41 0 2 0 Hour Totals: 0 1038 113 0 1 0 175 695 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 169 0 7 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 1508 9 3 No 12 No STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 1808 1 4 No 5 No STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 2200 0 9 No 9 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 2268 0 9 No 9 No
Contra Costa Blvd & Ellinwood Dr Traffic Signal
Urban
0 577 0 1019 3
781 6
1151 1
NO
AM PM
Pleasant Hill
10/28/21
0 School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
NO
236 4
6 0 212 2
Westbound
288
Eastbound
0 0 0
All Peds
Satisfied
Period
439 0
Northbound Southbound
247 7
1074 0 890 5 0 0
870 1

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 10 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 19 0 11 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 29 2 0 0 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 42 0 16 26 19 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 0 1 0 33 28 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 72 0 43 31 23 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 45 0 2 0 78 32 0 0 0 0 8:00 - 8:14 23 0 41 19 38 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 40 0 0 0 17 23 0 0 0 0 8:15 - 8:29 4 0 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 12 0 0 0 31 5 0 0 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 3 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 34 0 71 19 42 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 61 0 0 0 78 31 0 0 0 0 PM
1:30 - 1:44 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 4 0 13 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 16 3 0 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 5 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 3 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 1 0 Hour Totals: 17 0 34 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 25 0 0 0 47 6 0 0 1 0 2:30 - 2:44 6 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 5 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 0 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 6 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 3 0 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 20 0 55 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 35 0 0 0 43 6 0 0 0 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 282 31 25 No 56 Yes STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 302 19 42 No 61 Yes STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 141 2 6 No 8 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 171 1 2 No 3 No
Gladys Dr & Helen Rd STOP (All-Way)
Urban
NO
0 109 0
Pleasant Hill
10/28/21
Westbound
110
Eastbound
YES
57 2 0
49 0
51 7 0 0 37 0
75 3 0 0 47 0
53 1
105 61 0 0 88
Period
115 54
Northbound Southbound
0 0
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
All Peds
Satisfied
AM PM

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 37 0 0 0 0 0 58 2 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 54 1 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 2 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 1 100 7 0 0 0 5 86 1 0 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 4 6 13 0 0 2 1 1 6 0 1 0 13 137 19 8 8 4 8 123 5 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 10 6 25 0 2 2 5 2 8 0 8 0 15 328 27 8 8 4 13 344 8 0 0 0 8:00 - 8:14 1 3 15 1 4 2 5 3 12 0 1 0 8 104 9 1 13 8 5 105 1 0 0 0 8:15 - 8:29 0 0 10 0 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 90 3 0 0 0 7 101 1 0 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 3 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 94 6 0 0 0 4 97 2 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 3 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 106 4 0 0 0 8 97 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 7 3 31 1 5 2 12 4 18 0 2 0 11 394 22 1 13 8 24 400 5 0 0 0 PM
1:30 - 1:44 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 95 2 0 1 0 6 102 2 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 2 0 3 0 0 0 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 94 3 0 0 0 5 121 2 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 4 0 5 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 102 3 0 0 0 4 88 1 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 2 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 103 4 0 1 0 9 104 3 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 8 0 15 0 1 0 12 3 9 0 1 0 2 394 12 0 2 0 24 415 8 0 0 0 2:30 - 2:44 1 0 7 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 105 4 0 0 0 9 108 2 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 96 7 0 0 0 14 189 5 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 4 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 3 157 18 0 1 0 8 128 1 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 3 1 6 0 3 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 2 117 6 0 1 0 8 143 4 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 9 1 24 0 5 0 10 1 6 0 1 0 9 475 35 0 2 0 39 568 12 0 0 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 791 8 18 No 26 No STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 931 2 20 No 22 No STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 902 0 4 No 4 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 1189 0 8 No 8 No
619 0
23 1 24 1 408 2
17 1
Period
41 2
Northbound Southbound
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
NO
447 0
0 14 429 0
Westbound
365
Eastbound
427
370 16
All Peds
Satisfied
AM PM
Pleasant Hill
10/28/21
519
Gregory Ln & Brandon Rd STOP (Minor)
Urban
2 41 6 34 2
15 8
34 5
NO

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 63 2 11 1 0 0 2 0 11 0 0 0 8 95 135 0 0 0 33 281 1 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 71 1 6 2 0 0 4 5 14 0 0 0 4 179 198 0 0 0 42 422 3 1 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 102 1 15 2 3 0 2 7 25 0 0 0 5 196 258 0 0 0 64 440 3 0 1 0 7:45 - 7:59 107 0 22 0 1 0 6 8 20 0 0 0 12 233 290 0 0 0 73 381 3 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 343 4 54 5 4 0 14 20 70 0 0 0 29 703 881 0 0 0 212 1524 10 1 1 0 8:00 - 8:14 132 4 23 1 2 0 3 4 16 0 0 0 18 222 291 0 0 0 84 397 2 0 1 0 8:15 - 8:29 120 1 20 0 2 0 5 3 15 0 0 0 13 225 246 0 0 0 72 377 5 0 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 114 2 18 0 2 0 3 0 11 0 0 0 9 210 227 0 0 0 53 388 2 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 118 1 16 0 1 0 3 2 15 0 0 0 11 227 231 0 0 0 55 322 2 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 484 8 77 1 7 0 14 9 57 0 0 0 51 884 995 0 0 0 264 1484 11 0 1 0 PM
1:30 - 1:44 156 2 48 0 4 0 4 4 11 0 0 0 12 313 206 0 0 0 46 291 2 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 150 3 51 0 0 0 2 4 8 0 0 0 24 332 215 0 0 0 69 312 3 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 177 5 46 0 6 0 1 2 7 1 0 0 22 330 237 0 0 0 36 259 0 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 142 2 40 0 2 0 2 2 6 0 3 0 9 338 223 0 0 0 54 275 0 0 2 0 Hour Totals: 625 12 185 0 12 0 9 12 32 1 3 0 67 1313 881 0 0 0 205 1137 5 0 2 0 2:30 - 2:44 181 1 58 0 2 0 3 4 10 0 0 0 23 299 204 0 0 0 42 344 2 0 1 0 2:45 - 2:59 193 3 66 2 2 0 4 9 9 0 1 0 13 302 231 0 0 0 52 281 4 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 190 4 52 4 3 0 7 1 15 0 0 0 10 333 220 0 0 0 33 316 8 0 1 0 3:15 - 3:29 169 6 48 5 6 0 4 0 8 0 0 0 13 308 239 0 0 0 37 272 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 733 14 224 11 13 0 18 14 42 0 1 0 59 1242 894 0 0 0 164 1213 15 0 2 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 3864 6 5 No 11 No STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 4338 1 8 No 9 No STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 4483 1 17 No 18 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 4632 11 16 No 27 No
Monument Blvd & Buskirk Ave Traffic Signal
Urban
0 569 8 80 0
104 0
971 24
NO
AM PM
Pleasant Hill
10/28/21
2195
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
NO
1347 2
2 0 1759 1
Westbound
1746
Eastbound
1930
1613 0
All Peds
Satisfied
Period
401 9
Northbound Southbound
1392 2
822 12 53 4 2261 0
74 1

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 28 1 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 44 0 0 1 0 0 39 1 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 95 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 2 2 2 7:45 - 7:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 6 2 0 118 0 1 1 0 0 106 2 22 14 7 Hour Totals: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 7 2 2 290 0 1 2 0 0 248 4 24 16 9 8:00 - 8:14 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 154 0 0 0 0 0 88 2 11 31 15 8:15 - 8:29 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 1 0 8:30 - 8:44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 81 0 0 0 0 0 61 2 0 2 0 8:45 - 8:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 45 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 1 2 417 0 0 0 0 0 243 5 11 34 15 PM
1:30 - 1:44 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 65 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 2 1 0 1:45 - 1:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 1 0 2:15 - 2:29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 1 1 0 Hour Totals: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 2 0 1 271 0 0 0 0 0 212 0 3 3 0 2:30 - 2:44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 2 1 0 2:45 - 2:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 62 1 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 76 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 246 0 0 0 0 0 260 2 2 1 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 548 30 25 No 55 Yes STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 671 11 39 No 50 Yes STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 487 5 5 No 10 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 510 4 3 No 7 No
262 3
0 0 3 4 272 0
2 4
Period
0 0
Northbound Southbound
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
NO
212 6
40 0 248 45
Westbound
252
Eastbound
419
292 3
All Peds
Satisfied
AM PM
Pleasant Hill
10/28/21
246
Oak Park Blvd & Wendell Ln STOP (Minor)
Urban
0 0 0 4 5
4 12
0 0
YES

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 4 55 1 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 6 86 1 0 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 2 87 1 15 14 7 0 98 1 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 1 0 9 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 3 0 2 184 1 15 14 7 10 260 3 0 0 0 8:00 - 8:14 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 3 57 2 4 16 11 5 91 4 0 0 0 8:15 - 8:29 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 38 0 0 2 0 4 80 2 0 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 1 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 2 46 2 1 2 0 4 93 0 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 54 0 0 0 0 3 62 2 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 2 0 19 0 0 0 2 1 11 0 9 0 8 195 4 5 20 11 16 326 8 0 0 0 PM
1:30 - 1:44 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 44 2 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 1 61 0 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 66 0 0 1 0 1 55 0 0 1 0 2:15 - 2:29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 2 75 0 2 2 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 3 2 7 0 2 268 0 2 3 0 2 217 2 0 1 0 2:30 - 2:44 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 81 1 0 0 0 2 73 0 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 64 0 0 0 0 3 65 2 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 101 1 0 0 0 3 69 3 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 2 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 5 320 2 0 0 0 8 276 5 0 0 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 476 16 17 No 33 No STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 592 5 29 No 34 No STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 500 4 11 No 15 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 628 0 1 No 1 No
All Peds
Total
187 29
All Peds
Satisfied
Period
10 0
Northbound Southbound
289 0
3 0 6 9 270 5
Pleasant Hill Rd & Paradise Ln STOP (Minor)
Urban
0 21 0 14 9
6 4
7 0 5 1 327
NO
AM PM
Pleasant Hill
10/28/21
School
Peds
Satisfied
NO
221 1
0 25 350 0
Westbound
273
Eastbound
207

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only): Adult Crossing Guard - Warrant Satisfied:

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 19 1 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 0 0 3 11 0 1 3 0 7 3 3 1 6 71 0 9 1 4 3 38 10 3 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 0 1 1 1 1 2 3 0 20 0 0 0 45 57 0 3 3 2 3 32 49 9 2 1 Hour Totals: 0 1 5 12 2 3 10 0 34 3 4 1 53 153 0 12 4 6 6 99 61 12 2 1 8:00 - 8:14 1 3 3 2 0 1 12 2 22 0 0 0 31 76 0 1 0 1 1 27 22 1 4 4 8:15 - 8:29 0 0 2 1 4 2 14 0 10 0 1 0 1 56 1 0 2 1 2 45 0 1 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 23 4 0 0 0 8:45 - 8:59 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 Hour Totals: 2 3 6 3 6 3 31 2 36 0 3 0 36 157 1 1 2 2 3 102 26 2 5 4 PM
1:30 - 1:44 1 0 1 1 0 1 13 0 20 0 0 0 11 14 1 0 0 0 0 13 12 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 0 0 1 5 4 0 27 2 27 0 0 0 5 21 1 12 7 4 0 14 4 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 0 0 2 2 1 2 7 0 5 0 0 0 3 23 0 2 1 0 0 16 3 0 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 1 4 0 0 0 3 33 2 0 0 0 0 43 7 1 0 0 Hour Totals: 1 0 4 10 5 3 51 3 56 0 0 0 22 91 4 14 8 4 0 86 26 1 0 0 2:30 - 2:44 1 0 3 1 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 19 0 0 0 0 2 23 2 6 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 2 29 0 0 0 0 0 18 3 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 4 35 1 0 0 0 1 17 5 0 0 0 3:15 - 3:29 0 0 3 3 0 0 6 1 1 4 1 0 3 52 0 0 0 0 2 47 2 4 0 0 Hour Totals: 1 0 8 4 3 0 17 3 6 4 1 0 10 135 1 0 0 0 5 105 12 10 0 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 422 39 12 No 51 Yes STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 405 6 16 No 22 No STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 344 25 13 No 38 No Traffic Signal Hour 4 303 18 4 No 22 No
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
All Peds
Satisfied
Period
6 14
Northbound Southbound
122 10
5 15 110 0 117 22
9 7 26 5 146
Westbound
166
Eastbound
194
206 16
112 1
14 3 131 7 AM PM
Pleasant Hill
10/28/21
Viking Dr & Odin Dr STOP (Minor)
Urban
0 11 9 69 3
44 7
NO
NO

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements) Adult Crossing Guard Study
Traffic Data Collection Form
Intersection Name: Existing Intersection Controls:

Environment Type:

City:

Data Collection Date: Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid Peds Only):

Crossing Guard Criteria Satisfied (School Kid & Adult Peds):

Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard Left Through Right
School
Peds
Adult
Peds
Xing
Guard
AM
7:00 - 7:14 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 7:15 - 7:29 7 0 2 2 0 0 1 2 14 0 0 0 2 26 1 6 0 2 2 47 1 0 0 0 7:30 - 7:44 14 3 8 11 1 0 10 16 41 0 0 0 15 56 13 26 2 17 9 64 0 0 0 0 7:45 - 7:59 20 12 14 14 0 0 14 5 31 17 1 8 12 43 14 44 0 18 6 51 4 1 1 0 Hour Totals: 42 17 25 27 1 0 26 24 92 17 1 8 29 132 28 76 2 37 17 184 5 1 1 0 8:00 - 8:14 20 1 6 14 0 0 5 3 32 2 0 1 20 81 12 17 0 4 3 78 2 0 0 0 8:15 - 8:29 18 4 3 5 0 0 5 6 37 2 0 0 20 84 9 15 0 0 1 70 1 0 0 0 8:30 - 8:44 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 5 0 1 0 11 42 3 0 0 0 2 32 2 0 2 0 8:45 - 8:59 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 4 8 2 0 0 0 1 31 3 0 0 0 Hour Totals: 43 6 11 20 1 0 13 15 78 4 1 1 55 215 26 32 0 4 7 211 8 0 2 0 PM
1:30 - 1:44 2 0 2 6 4 0 1 2 6 3 0 0 1 49 2 3 0 0 2 41 1 0 0 0 1:45 - 1:59 7 2 3 5 7 0 1 4 7 1 0 0 3 28 2 0 2 0 0 40 2 0 0 0 2:00 - 2:14 4 6 1 0 1 0 3 5 9 0 0 1 2 82 1 1 2 2 8 41 4 2 0 0 2:15 - 2:29 6 9 13 39 1 0 7 12 13 23 0 2 11 39 5 66 0 13 4 41 13 4 0 0 Hour Totals: 19 17 19 50 13 0 12 23 35 27 0 3 17 198 10 70 4 15 14 163 20 6 0 0 2:30 - 2:44 1 5 3 3 0 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 8 52 6 1 0 0 5 29 2 0 0 0 2:45 - 2:59 6 4 5 1 2 0 2 2 4 0 1 0 4 33 2 0 2 0 1 55 4 0 0 0 3:00 - 3:14 3 12 7 2 0 0 2 3 14 1 1 0 4 59 7 3 1 0 6 59 3 0 1 0 3:15 - 3:29 8 6 7 68 0 0 6 8 8 17 2 0 14 55 10 50 1 0 6 68 9 3 2 0 Hour Totals: 18 27 22 74 2 0 13 13 33 18 4 0 30 199 25 54 4 0 18 211 18 3 3 0 MUTCD - CA, CROSSING GUARD CRITERIA: Traffic Data Summary Control Types: Environmental Type: Urban Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Rural Criteria: Auto Sc Peds Vehicles School Peds Adult Peds Uncontrolled Rural Uncontrolled: 350 40 Uncontrolled: 300 30 Hour 1 621 121 5 Yes 126 Yes STOP (Minor) Urban STOP: 500 40 STOP: 500 40 Hour 2 688 56 4 Yes 60 Yes STOP (All-Way) Traffic Signal: 300 40 Traffic Signal: 300 40 Hour 3 547 153 17 Yes 170 Yes Traffic Signal Hour 4 627 149 13 Yes 162 Yes
School
Peds
Satisfied
All Peds
Total
All Peds
Satisfied
YES
YES
2 247 6
74 197 6
226 2
Westbound
206
Eastbound
Period
84 28
Northbound Southbound
55 63 70 27 225
67 76 59 22 254
296
189 78
AM PM
58 32
Pleasant Hill
10/28/21
Viking Dr / Ruth Dr STOP (All-Way)
Urban
60 21 106 5
142 18

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Intersection Study (2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements)