Agenda packet — Pleasant Hill City Council, May 18, 2023 (part 11 of 12)

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2075 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) The draft "Housing Element" prepared by the City makes false statements about the proposed parcels. In particular, City ·staff say that the site is appropriate for "upzoning due to its close proximity to multifamily residential uses on three sides, its location in a high resource area, and its large size~ Multiple condominiums are located around the complex .... making additional high-density development an expected and conforming use and development pattern in the area."
Contrary to the staff's statement, the Morello and Paso Nogal parcels have always been zoned for single-family homes. The suggestion that residents of this area should be on notice that this parcel is conducive for high density housing is utterly untrue. Moreover, in a faux attempt to persuade the State to approve the project, the City argues that the Morello site is in a "high resource" area. That, also, is faM. There are no resources at the site, no transit service, and the nearest markets, restaurants etc. are over one mile away. (3) Ibe location is improper tor high density housing
This project will tum Morello Avenue into a congested high traffic area with massive impacts of traffic, noise, and other "Quality of Life" issues. In addition, a high density construction project could affect the geological integrity of our adjacent property which we know is prone to erosion, drainage issues, and slippage.
(4) Other site options should be considered
First, the City should ask the State to reconsider the JC Penney Furniture store site which has far more resources and is closer to many services such as transit, grocery stores, restaurants etc. Second, assuming the Jq Penney site is unavailable, the City must find other locations that are better suited for this project.

In conclusion, we recognize the need for more housing and that the City must comply with stringent new laws to increase housing availability. But the adoption of this rezoning attempt is absolutely inappropriate. The city has deliberately not provided sufficient notice nor considered other locations in the city for this type of housing. The revised Housing Element draft by staff should be rejected.

Since~~-s-(!1 Z, ti' . =
Madeira Heights Townhouses Association Board of Directors:

Brendan Hurd, Board President~ e,/{,__j _ Larry Barlettani, Vice President Ytt~ li'atef dh~lL MaryAnn Dinatale, Secretary 1~ ~ ~?c+;tz,ec--
Christine Culshaw, Treasurer (.:f1ai{Jcl;~ (:,,u's-1,~J· ' Page 2 of2

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2076 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) r
(
From: Victoria Menear [email protected]
Subject: Correction -For public comment at planning commission meeting 5-3--23 about Paso Nogal/Moreffo rezoning and development
Date: May 1, 2023 at 1 :55 PM
To: [email protected]
Hello
I am resending the body of the amended email I sent on the 28'th ( with one additional statement) because the old one is still the one on the comments section of your website. I am also CC'ing it to several neighbours as confirmation it was sent prior to the meet,ng.

I am writing about the general plan to enable development at the comer of Paso Nogal and Morello and on Paso Nogal.

I formally object on several issues.

Firstly in the notice that was posted on the city's site on April 14 'th it says:
"Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15080,' a Draft Environmental Impact Report was pfepared for the proposed entitlements by the lead agency (City of Pleasant Hill), and circulated for public review between January 30, 2023 and March 15, 2023"
The above statement was just regarding the environmental impact report but in my opinion, with something that carries the impact this proposal will have on traffic, safety, property values and other issues, there should be a notice in every mailbox in the vicinity of the project not just about the environmental report but about the scope of the whole project. As far as. I can tell nothing was "circulated." I found out about it in an email from a neighbour. With such sparse notice, those concerned citizens in the neighbourhood who oppose the plan had very little time to gather their thoughts, organise or consult a land use attorney in a timely manner.

Secondly, its a violation of public trust to change zoning laws in a way that will potentially affect the atmosphere of the neighbourhood and the value of the neighbouring homes, the security of the area, etc. This area has been zoned R-15 or R-20 since I moved here 35 years ago. The city likely had good reasons to choose to zone it that way. Perhaps it's a good idea to review those reasons. Under that zoning the allowed build on the Morello and Paso Nogal sites would be 15 and 7 units respectively. Under the new zoning it would be between 196-262 for the Morello site and 102 - 136 for the Paso Nogal site.

Wording on page 138 document F says:
"The site has been identified as suitable for upzoning due to its close proximity to multifamily residential uses on three sides, its location in a high resource area, and its large size. Multiple condominiums are located around the complex on Janin Place, Fairway PJace, Douglas Terrace, and Ridgeview Place, therefore making additional high-density development an expected and conforming use and development pattern in the area. Additionally, its large size allows for well planned, cohesive developments that are able to maximire density and incorporate cohesive planning that can include mixed-use components and the addition of services. "
Thats Just distorting reality. The plan allows for up to 262 units on the 6 plus acre Morello .... .- •• -- • .. _ , ______ - . ... --- .&1-- ------ -1.a.•-- _ .. ., __ .. , ... _ ___ ---- _____ .. ___ ,...!' ____ .... _,_ .. ... ~ ----!&- --- ----... ~------ _

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2077 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) parceI. . As I zoom out on me map or me area mere are approx1ma1e1y 14U units on conoguous real estate, including across the street, taking up more than three to four times the size of the proposed Morello parcel.

What you are proposing is not equivalent as you suggest.

I support the idea of low cost housing but to go to a residential area and increase the parcel density not by double, not by triple but by 17 to 20 times is truly a shirking of responsibility to the residents that already live in the neighbourhood.

Putting up the equivalent of 250-350 unit apartment complexes is absurd and will be an eyesore in a neighbourhood of single family homes and quality townhomes. It's totally incongruous to the surroundings and will potentially impad the issues .I mentioned above. (value of the surrounding real estate, traffic, safety.) A 300 unit complex is something you build in town not in the middle of a quiet residential community.

Use the lots to build quality, low density, low cost housing that conforms to the R-15 or R-20 zoning. It's better for the neighbourhood and better for the future residents of that housing.

Thank you for your consideration,
Vidoria Menear

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2078 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( crom:
..1ent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Saeper Nesaei <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1:47 PM
Planning
samaneh amini
Letter of Objection- Concerned Residents on the development of a four story, multi building 196-unit apartment complex on Morello Terrace
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear members of the Planning Committee,
We (Sepehr Nesaei and Samaneh Aminikhanghahi) have recently purchased a townhome at 1203 Ridgeview Place, Pleasant Hill and it has been about a year that we enjoyed the frie'ndly, safe, calm and peaceful, and healthy community.

It has been brought to our attention that there will be a public hearing by the Planning Commission regarding the development of a 196-unit apartment complex on Morello Terrace.

We, as the current neighboring residents, are strongly opposed to the current development for the following reasons:
1) Due to a significant rise in traffic, it is reasonable to assume that most tenants will own an additional vehicle that the complex cannot accommodate. As a result, the streets in the surrounding area, including Douglas Terrace, St Germain ( Place, Netherby Street, Netherby Place, Janin Place Fairway Place, Morello Avenue, Ridgeview Drive, and Ridgeview Place, ;ill experience a drastic overspill of parked cars. Given that this is not a transit-rich locality per Senate Bill 10, it is reasonable to assume that cars will be the primary mode of transportation for the residents. 2) The complete excavation of the hillside will cause an irreparable degradation of the environment and wildlife habitat.

The hillside serves as a vital corridor for local populations of coyote, opossum, raccoon, deer, turkey, and ground squirrel, allowing them.to migrate between Hidden Lake Park and Paso Nogal Park. Without this route, roadkill events will increase, further damaging our local wildlife population. In addition, the excavation required to make way for a four-story, multibuilding complex will transform a mild/moderate natural gradient slope to a vertical gradient, requiring thousands of gallons of diesel fuel for grading the slopes. This destruction of open-space land directly conflicts with the guidance outlined in Government Code 65400, which emphasizes the importance of implementing practical means for orderly growth and development, preservation, and conservation-of open-space land and natural resources. 3) The proposed four-story apartment complex's construction would result in a severe disruption of the surrounding housing and uniformity. The complex's density, architecture, and land usage would be completely singular, with no contextual relationship to the surrounding area. The resulting increase in population density would negate the intended building edges' transition, context, and privacy, which were carefully planned and implemented in the surrounding neighborhood.

For the above reasons and multiple other reasons, we are in support of this objection and ask for a reconsideration of the massive negative impact that this decision can bring to the surrounding area and ~onstituents.
,ncerely,
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2079 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Madeira Heights Residents
Sepehr Nesaei & Samaneh Aminikhanghahi
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2080 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:
;ent:

To:

Subject:

DBRE Investment Group < [email protected] >
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1 :34 PM
Planning
OBJECTION TO MORELLO TERRACES!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: Pleasant Hill Planning Committee:

MY OBJECTION to the proposal to re-zone the Morello Terrace (open nature space at comer of Morello and N etherby hillside to accommodate a four story apartment complex to contain 196 dwelling units (apartments); and proposal including plans forthe identical re-zoning to a vacant site on Paso N ogal.

As an owner of three properties in the Ridgeview and Golf Ridge area I am highly against this development. ·
The Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan provides no rationale for the selection of the Morello Terraces over other available lots nor are there any insight to the "Planning Teams" consideration of ~Itemative lots/strategies, any analysis of impact to the surrounding environment, oradherence to .,urrounding community input. The Planning Commission's complete neglect of input from the surrounding communities - as well as the non-existent consideration of alternative strategies or analysis of impact - forces me to objected loudly! I object for the following reasons:

Drastic increase in traffic flux: It is reasonable to assume most tenants would have an additional car, which the complex would not accommodate, resulting in drastic overspill of vehicle parking into neighboring streets such as Douglas Terrace, St Germain Place, Netherby Street, Netherby Place, Janin Place, Fairway Place, Morello Avenue, Ridgeview Drive, Ridgeview Place. This lot is not a transit rich area per Senate Bill 1 0;therefore it is reasonable to assume cars would be the residents primary form of transportation.

Additionally, Morello Avenue is filled with major morning and afternoon traffic from nonresident communities driving to Diablo Valley College, College Park High School, Valley View Middle School and Valhalla Elementary School.

Complete degradation of the environment/wildlife habitat(the entire hillside will be excavated):

This hillside is an important corridor for local coyote, opossum, raccoon, deer, turkey, and ground ~quirrel populations to migrate between Hidden Lakes Park and Paso N ogal Park. Without the ,.Jility to traverse this plot, roadkill events will continue to increase and further decimate our local wildlife population. The excavation of this hillside will also transform a mild/moderate natural 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2081 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) gradient slope to a vertical gradient to accommodate a four-story, multi building complex, which would require thousands of gallons of diesel fuel needed to grade the slopes.

This destruction ·of open-space land is seemingly at odds with the guidance set forth in Government Code 65400; " ... practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plar so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources ... " Severe disruption of the surrounding housing privacy/uniformity: The proposed four-story apartment complex would be completely singular in its density, architecture, and land usage compared to the surrounding area. The resulting increase in population density would negate the intended surrounding building edges, transition, context, and privacy.

My Assessment.

The selection of Morello Terraces (and Paso Nogal) maximally benefits the "Planning Committee's" future claim of political achievements and the Corporate Builders density tax credits, while completely neglecting the impact to the surrounding area and constituents. When the decision points to benefiting the "Planning Committee" and builders without any engagement of the surrounding community, I strongly object!
Sincerely,
Brett Thomas
Founder & Owner
Lead Instructor
The Catching Academy
[email protected]
(925)822-5851
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2082 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( -From:

Jent:

To:

Subject:

Christine Schulz <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1 :28 PM
Planning
Fw: NO ON Morello Terrace development!!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hi,
I will also be attending the city council meeting on Wednesday but wanted to get a written complaint against the new build plan near our neighborhood. This will disrupt so much in our suburbs including the wildlife. There are SO many other areas in Pleasant hill that will make so much more sense near transit where street lights are already built and bus lines will not need to be added. Some of our units will lose the beautiful view of the hillside and the wildlife that visits will all go away.

Not to mention the wildlife of deer, turkey and wildflowers that will be affected from this horrible building project you are proposing. I lived in San Francisco for 10 years and the main reason I moved out to the suburbs and specifically not near downtown was for the quiet which will be ruined by this build. Our homeowner property areas will decrease as no one who wants to live in the deep suburbs wants bus lines, streetlights and have to look for parking at the local parks near us.

Please take our small community into consideration and build this monstrosity somewhere closer to tlw downtown where there is already a disruption of mass transit, street lights and tall buildings. ~hristine Schulz

1.{esident
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2083 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Jane Kennedy <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1 :24 PM
Planning
Rezoning of Morello Terrace
Planning Commission Letter.docx
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless ou reco nize the sender.

Hello,
The attached letter is in response to the proposal to rezone the lot called Morello Terrace for the development of a four story, 196 unit complex.

Thank you for reading the attached letter and I look forward to attending the in-person meeting at City Hall on May 3.

Jane Kennedy
Concerned Madeira Heights Resident
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2084 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( f=rom:
1ent:

To:

Subject:

George Tereshko <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1 :06 PM
Planning
Objections to the planning
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Please do not plan it!
"Low Income High Density" project is not welcome!
George Tereshko.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2085 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Mary-Lynn Lidstone <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1 :02 PM
Planning
[email protected]
Re: proposed apartments at Netherby and Morello. Correspondence is for public comment at the Planning Commission meeting
IMG20230501101543~2Jpg
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments · unless you reco nize the sender.

To: Planning Commission, City of Pleasant Hill
From: Mary-Lynn Lidstone, 1776 Douglas Terrace, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 I agree with the State of CA that there needs to be more affordable housing for low-income individuals and families. The high rents in Pleasant.Hill are shocking. However, I am adamantly opposed to your proposed plan to build 250-300 apartment units at the hilly slope at Morello and Netherby. It also has a sinkhole These are my reasons:
1) The I 1/2 mile area between Taylor Blvd and Hidden Lakes Park is one of the most congested areas of Pleasant Hill. This is the absolute worse area for more people and more cars. As you know, we have a Community College, a high school, a middle school, an elementary school, a Montessori school, and a Day Care for the elderly all within this one section. "This section" is between Netherby, Morello, Contra Costa Blvd and Taylor Blvd.

As one example, the 4-way intersection at Paso Nogul and Netherby is already hazardous. Approximately once a week, someone drives straight through without stopping. Every few days, someone doesn't notice that there are cars coming from Netherby; they stop for a second and keep driving. 2) There are less congested areas of Pleasant Hill. The open area at Morello and Elderwood is an example. 3) Wildlife is abundant in the 6 acres in the lot between Morello and Netherby. We have families of wild turkeys, deer on a regular basis, quail, a cove of ground squirrels, and occasionally, coyote. Yesterday, there were 3 wild turkeys walking down Douglas Terrace. Where will they go? I have contacted my local Sierra Club for their input.
4) Our schools. Some classes at Valhalla elementary were already beyond capacity in Sept, 2022. How will the schools accommodate hundreds of new students?
5) Health concerns: I am concerned about the exhaust from the hundreds of vehicles added to our block. I already have health issues and that the last thing I need is environmental hazards.

So how would the proposed 250-300 apartments affect me? I would lease our house out and move. It would be challenging to drive down Netherby let alone around this part of Morello and Paso Nogul. The quality oflife would plummet for those of us on Douglas Terrace.

My father, a World War II vet, bought this house in the 80's. It was his pride and joy. I have cared for each of my parents in this house. Almost every member of my large family has lived in this house.

Lastly, Douglas Terrace seems to be the only street in Pleasant Hill that only has houses on one side. So, we get a lot of walkers up here, dog walkers, parents pushing strollers, people watching full moon risings, July 4th fireworks watchers, etc .. I've seen busy Moms have picnics up here with their kids. I've seen artists sketching Mt. Diablo since the view from this street is spectacular. Our street is, in essence, a community street.

But no more. Cars, parking lots, apartments, noise, car fumes: our new Douglas Terrace. No thanks! 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2086 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ~rom:
)ent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:
[email protected]
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 12:53 PM
Planning
[email protected]
Low Income High Density Housing protest
Low Income High Density HousingJpeg
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Good afternoon,
We purchased our home in Diablo Valley Estates 33 years ago to live in a beautiful, quiet neighborhood with amazing hills, roads and only beautiful houses. We want our children and grandchildren to enjoy this beauty too.

Paso Nogal Park, Hidden Lakes Park make this neighborhood very special. Just like many Natural Parks in USA are protected please protect ours.

As a Pleasant Hill City management please do not allow developers to ruin this ,recious area. Please choose beauty, love for nature, environment and care for your city residents and not the greed of developers. We trust that our representatives will make the right decision and do the right thing.

Sincerely,
Bogusia and Marian Kizior
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2087 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Colleen Libbey <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 12:37 PM
Troy Fujimoto

PLEASE DO NOT REZONE MORELLO TERRACES
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you reco nize the sender. _ _
The best part of living in Pleasant Hill is all of the green space, wildlife, and minimal traffic. I've lived here since 2005 at 1012 Ridgeview Place. By building a 4 story, 196 unit apartment building would greatly affect our quality of life. My home will be directly next to it and it will cause a huge influx of traffic and additional parking of vehicles spilling out into all of our neighborhoods.

Our wildlife will be greatly impacted by evacuating an entire hillside belonging to local coyote, opossum, deer, turkey and ground squirrel populations. This destruction of open space greatly contradicts government code 65400, "practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plan, so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources.

This apartment structure will greatly disrupt the surrounding residents of their privacy. I am at great risk of having the enormity of the apartment building right next to my bedroom and kitchen windows. We have no other structures in this area comparing to this density, architecture, or land usage in this neighborhood. It would stick out like a sore thumb.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter and please take to heart how this will affect our neighborhood.

Colleen Libbey
1012 Ridgeview Place, Pleasant Hill
571.451.7245
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2088 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
~rom:
,ent:

To:

Cc:

Barbara Mccomsey < [email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 12:06 PM
Planning
Barbara Mccomsey
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I am Barbara Mccomsey
7 St.Louis Lane
Pleasant hill
925 683 4161
I do not support "low income high density" housing to be built on 2 open spaces: Paso Nagai between Morello and Alhambra Rd and on Morello Ave near the corner of Paso Nogal.

One cannot help but wonder what you folks are thinking to even consider something l'ike that. What do you get in return for doing this? You must not live anywhere near or you would know that Paso Noga! has already become a speed route despite postings. It's ALREADY crowded! It always amazes me that when someone gets in power they want to change things and don't think of the consequences to those who have lived here for years (43.). It's usually about money and this probably is. There are more important things.

Vou have likely already decided, but it was worth a try to say NO.

Barbara Mccomsey
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2089 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subjed:

Colleen Libbey <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 12:05 PM
Planning
[email protected]

PLEASE DO NOT REZONE MORELLO TERRACES
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

The best part of living in Pleasant Hill is all of the green space, wildlife, and minimal traffic. I've lived here since 2005 at 1012 Ridgeview Place. By building a 4 story, 196 unit apartment building would greatly affect our quality of life. My home will be directly next to it and it will cause a huge influx of traffic and additional parking of vehicles spilling out into all of our neighborhoods.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter and please take to heart how this will affect our neighborhood.

Colleen Libbey
1012 Ridgeview Place, Pleasant Hill
571.451.7245
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2090 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
"=rom:
,ent:

To:

Subject:

Marcia Veenstra <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 12:01 PM
Planning
Housing plans for Paso Nogal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Housing development on Paso Noga I is poorly planned and unrealistic for these reasons:

Paso Noga I is a main road to DVC from Martinez, Pacheco and areas west of the campus. The two-lane road is very curvy and heavily traveled with high speeds. Entering this road from a driveway would be dangerous and an accident waiting to happen ... especially with this many units.
**We have difficulty entering Paso Nogal from Pillon Real where the road is not as curvy.

Ample parking for these units has not been considered. Where would there be guest parking? Paso Nogal does not allow for parking with the narrow road.

The hill is unstable and steep. The existing homes in the area have experienced difficulty with pipes, cracks, restructuring supports, and extensive costs as land movement caused problems. These units will experience more problems with drainage and movement.
-This area is zoned for single dwelling homes not multiple housing units.

What is the credibility of the builder proposing these plans? Marcia Veenstra. Home owner
9 Pillon Real
Pleasant Hill
925-932-5443
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2091 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From: [email protected]
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 11 :57 AM
Planning
Sent:

To:

Subject: Public Hearing May 3, 2023 - Opinion
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To:

From:

Pleasant Hill City Council
Richard & Kathleen Roberts
603 Paso Nogal Rd.

Pleasant Hill, CA
We have lived on Paso Nogal Rd. since 1973 and have seen many changes as various living communities have been built along the road over the past 40+ years. We have not objected to any of these until now. Without being informed by the city it has come to our attention that 2 new developments of high-density housing are planned for the Paso Nogal/Morello area.

Please note that this is not a case of NIMBY. We love Pleasant Hill and want the city to maintain its current small town feel, while being open to appropriate development. However implementing this proposal will actually create safety and traffic concerns, while removing ont:::
of the last pieces of a publicly enjoyed rural road.

We have 2 main objections:
1) When we first moved here it was possible to walk along Paso Noga I, see cows grazing, and enjoy the atmosphere of what was then the last rural road in the city. Fast forward to now and the scene has changed as cars speed down the road and it often takes us over 5 full minutes to exit our driveway due to the constant stream of traffic from both directions. Several years ago, the speed limit was actually raised on Paso Noga I enabling the already "over the limit" traffic to drive even faster. Even with that unwelcome action, Paso Nogal is still the last 'rural-ish' road in PH. It is not designed to take the greatly increased number of vehicles that this proposed high-density housing would generate, creating safety concerns as well as additional frustration for current residents whose drives exit onto the road.
2) Secondly, Paso Nagai is one of the few roads that is actually "pleasant" (as in Pleasant Hill) to drive or walk along. The former developments all managed to maintain an "out of sight" presence, with entries along the road, but the actual housing is not visible.

These proposed projects would clearly be seen along the road, thus removing the stat~r of Paso Noga I being the last rural road in the city. The visual impact of high-density 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2092 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) housing will definitely not be in keeping with the current Paso Nagai/Morello view corridor.

Please reconsider this proposal and thank you for listening to the concerns of long-time Pleasant Hill residents.
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2093 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent: ·
To:

Subject:

Christine O'Neill <christineoneillstitt@gmaiLcom>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 11 :37 AM
Planning
Objection to proposal to rezone the Morello Terrace
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

May 2,2023
To: Pleasant Hill Planning Committee:

I am objecting to the proposal to rezone the Morello Terrace (open nature space at corner of Morello and Netherby hillside) to accommoda~e a four story apartment complex to contain 196 dwelling units (apartments); and/or proposal including plans for the identical rezoning to a vacant site on Paso Noga I.

The Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan provides no rationale for the selection of the Morello Terraces over other available lots, nor are there any insight to the "Planning Teams" consideration of a·lternative lots/strategies, any analysis of impact to the surrounding environment, or adherence to surrounding community input. The Planning Commission's complete neglect of input from the surrounding communities - as well as the non-existent consideration of alternative strategies or analysis of impact - forces me to object loudly!
I object for the following reasons:

Drastic increase in traffic flux: It is reasonable to assume most tenants would have an additional car, which the complex would not accommodate, resulting in drastic overspill of vehicle parking into neighboring streets such as Douglas Terrace, St Germain Place, Netherby Street, Netherby Place~ Janin Place, Fairway Place, Morello Avenue, Ridgeview Drive, Ridgeview Place. This lot is not a transit rich area per Senate Bill 10; therefore, -it is reasonable to assume cars would be the residents' primary form of transportation.

Additionally, Morello Avenue is filled with major morning and afternoon traffic from non-resident communities driving to Diablo Valley College, College Park High School, Valley View Middle School and Valhalla Elementary School.

Complete degradation of the environment/wildlife habitat (the entire hillside will be excavated): This hillside is an important corridor for local coyote, opossum, raccoon, deer, turkey, and ground squirrel populations to migrate between Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nagai Park. Without the ability to trav.erse this plot, roadkill events will continue to increase and further decimate our local wildlife population. The excavation of this hillside will also transform a mild/moderate natural gradient slope to a vertical gradient to accommodate a four-story, multi building complex, which would require thousands of gallons of diesel fuel needed to grade the slopes.

This destruction of open-space land is seemingly at odds with the guidance set forth in Government Code 65400; " ... practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plan, so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources ... " 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2094 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Severe disruption of the surrounding housing privacy/uniformity: The proposed four-story apartment complex would be completely singular in its density, architecture, and land usage compared to the surrounding area. The resulting increase in population density would negate the intended surrounding building edges, transition, context, and privacy.

My Assessment.

The selection of Morello Terraces (and Paso Nogal) maximally benefits the "Planning Committee's" future claim of political achievements and the Corporate Builders density tax credits, while completely neglecting the impact to the surrounding area and constituents. When the decision points to benefiting the "Planning Committee" and builders without any engagement of the surrounding community, I strongly object! Sincerely,
Christine O'Neill
101 Southwind Drive
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
[email protected]
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2095 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Big DMG <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 11 :29 AM
Planning
Morello Terrace 192 unit apartment development concerns CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize_the s~nder.

To Whom it May Concern,
I am writing as a resident and homeowner in the Ridgeview residential areas of my opposition to the planned development of the 192 unit apartment area at Morello Ave.

A development of that size requires more thought and planning and as a resident of the area my main concerns revolve around the added traffic and congestion it will cause, as well as the appropriateness of a complex that size being placed in an area known for open rolling hills and spacious areas.

I believe there are other spaces in the Pleasant Hill area that can be better utilized for this purpose, that is closer to public transportation and further discussion needs to take place. The area on Morello close to Safeway already serves as a main hub leading to Taylor Blvd. and on commute mornings is already heavily congested as lS.

Please consider the well being and utility of building on this site, and take into account the numerous oppositi0 ... to this project. Know that many residents are monitoring this situation and plan to make their input heard.

Thank you.

Michael Go
Ridgeview resident and homeowner
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2096 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ~rom:
,ent:

To:

Subject:

Ward Wogsland <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 11 :02 AM
Planning
Paso Nogal 3.4 acre site
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

This site is currently zoned for single family. It is also on a road designated as country road. It is a two lane road with fairly heavy traffic. Rezoning would be poor decision.

It is located on a curve. Residents leaving Pillon Real have to be very careful to avoid collisions. Multi unit site traffic would greatly provide additional hazards.

The site. Is located on a very steep hill. Massive dirt removal would be necessary as hill is quite unstable. Even providing enough parking would be very difficult and would most likely result in residents parking across the street on city property and then crossing on foot across a very busy road.

Extensive retaining walls would be need that would most likely shift over time as would the buildings.

It is one thing to build a small home but large buildings do not make sense. fJne additional item. How do you get on and off site. Very steep - no good and safe way.

Please reject Paso Nogal 3.4 acre for multiple housing.

Ward Wogsland. 9 Pillon Real
Sent from my iPad
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2097 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Brian Gigliotti <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10:53 AM
Planning
Subject: Morello and Paso Nogal Housing Projects
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments - - unless you recognize the sender. _ _ ~ _ _
To whom it may concern,
I am a homeowner in the Diablo Estate community of Pleasant Hill. I've recently been informed that the city is considering a project to build two low income housing complexes in the area of Morello Ave and Paso No gal. This email is to inform the city that I am in firm opposition to this project. I'll be attending the public hearing along with several other prominent members of our community to voice our opposition.

Sincerely,
Brian M Gigliotti, CRPC®
Senior Vice President
Senior Financial Advisor
CA Insurance Lie.# OE39275; Merrill Life Agency. # 0522776 NMLS ID 558503
Merrill Lynch Wealth Management
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
555 California Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone 415 676-2553 / Fax 415 599-2265
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2098 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Brian. [email protected]
This material is being provided to you upon your request and is for informational purposes only.

The information contained herein has been obtained from sources or data that we believe to be reliable, but we do not offer any guarantees as to its accuracy or completeness. Market information is subject to change without notice and past performance is no guarantee of future results. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other instrument. Merrill considers your trade confirmations and account statements to be the official documentation of all of your transactions.

This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2099 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Brendan Finley <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10:36 AM
Planning .

Residents against the development of four story apartment on Morello Terrace CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear City Reps
Please accept this note as a rejection for the 196-unit apartment complex on Morello Terrace. Morello road is already over saturated with traffic and has become a danger for residents to walk and enjoy the beauty of Pleasant Hill. An additional 196 units will add more traffic and take away from a residential home community that is in this area.

We should be saving nature areas that are good for environment wildlife not taking more. Its already difficult to walk on Morello with traffic we do not need to make it more of an accident zone for walkers, elders, and children. With the current post pandemic and offices closing and unfortunately small retail shop declining there are now an abundance of small shopping strips including the decline of our mall where Sears is that could be developed into strong housing communities for apartments and condos. We understand we all have a part in each community to· support development, but we have many areas within the footprint of Pleasant Hill that can be rezoned from business areas that remain empty to housing developments, lets make a win-win and be smart. We know as representatives for the community that rejecting this development is the correct action.

Brendan Finley- Albert Ochoa
465 Ridgeview dr
Pleasant Hill Ca
Internet email confidential notice: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s} and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. The information contained within or attached to this email is considered confidential information of Arcis Golf and its affiliates.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2100 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) The draft "Housing Element" prepared by the City makes false statements about the proposed parcels. In particular, City staff say that the site is appropriate for "upzoning due to its close proximity to multifamily residential uses on three sides, its location in a high resource area, and its large size. Multiple condominiums are located around the complex .... making additional high-density development an expected and conforming use and development pattem in the area."
Contrary to the staff's statement, the Morello and Paso Nogal parcels have always been zoned for single-family homes. The suggestion that residents of this area should be on. notice that this parcel is conducive for high density housing is utterly untrue. Moreover, in a faux attempt to persuade the State to approve the project, the City argues that the Moreno site is in a "high resource" area. That, also, is fala. There are no resources at the site, no transit service, and the nearest markets, restaurants etc. are over one mile away. (3) Ibt location is Improper tor biqb density housing
This project will tum Morello Avenue into a congested high traffic area with massive impacts of traffic, noise, and other "Quality of Life" issues. In addition, a high density construction project could affect the geological integrity of our adjacent property which we know is prone to erosion, drainage issues, and slippage.
(4) Other site options should be considered
Arst, the City should ask the State to reconsider the JC Penney Fumiture store site which has far more resources and is closer to many services such as transit, grocery stores, restaurants etc. Second, assuming the JC Penney site is unavailable, the City must find other locations that are better suited for this project In conclusion, we recognize the need for more housing and that the City must comply with stringent new laws to increase housing availability. But the adoption of this rezoning attempt is absolutely inappropriate. The city has deliberately not provided sufficient notice nor considered other locations in the city for this type of housing. The revised Housing Bement draft by staff should be rejected.

Since~ z!U
Madeira Heights Townhouses Association Board of Directors:

Brendan Hurd, Board President ~ C,1-(__j
Lany Bar1ettani, Vice President ~+if zrau:, dbUL--
Christine
MaryAnn
Cutshaw,
Dinatale,
Treasurer
Secretary
t:17~
-~ ~
· {;:,t/. ~ s/~
Page2of2

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2101 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Stephanie <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10:13 AM
Pla_nning
Opposition to rezoning land on Morello and Paso Nogal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To the Pleasant Planning Commission,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning of the 6 acre lot on the comer of Morello and Paso N ogal in Pleasant Hill. This proposed housing development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in our neighborhood are completely opposed to the addition of high density housing that will worsen traffic and lead to safety problems, destroy local wildlife habitat, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community.

The traffic and safety of pedestrians is a major area of concern. Rush hour traffic already makes it impossible for people to cross the street on Morello from Hidden Lakes Park all the way to Taylor Blvd. What do you think adding 800 more cars in that small area will do? Where will all the overflow cars park when you can't even park on Morello right now? A traffic surge during momi~ rush hour will also negatively impact safety for our _children who walk to school in the mornings . .1.i1 general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already a big problem on Morello.

Developing this land will affect wildlife. There are deer, opossums, squirrels, countless turkeys, and other birds that cross Morello daily towards that hill side. Any development on this land will destroy their habitat.

Lastly, the property values are likely to go down in the area if multifamily apartments are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. This is a quiet neighborhood with mostly single-family homes. The tranquility and safety of this neighborhood is the reason why people have moved to here. I was extremely disappointed that not a single notice about this rezoning was mailed to our homes in the Ridgeview neighborhood. To be frank, it seems a bit suspicious that this has been kept so quiet. Planning Commision members, how about we place 1000 new neighbors and 800 more cars next door to your home? I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails.

Best regards,
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2102 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Stephanie Marin-Keough
(
(
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2103 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:
bjcheshire <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10:08 AM
Planning
PH is considering building 250- 300 apartments at Morello and Paso Nogal.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Attention: Planning Commission
Dear neighbors (See the message below) this is a very serious issue. Given the location of this proposed rezoning. There are serious questions that require transparency as to this proposed rezoning.
1 Who proposed the rezoning?
2 Why are we hearing about from Next Door instead of having a notice sent to us? 3 Who is the developer for these apartments?
4 Who receives the money for the sale of the property?
5 How much will Pleasant Hill receive for this rezoning project? 6 How will adding low-income property to our area impact the current value of our homes? 7 What is the impact to the local traffic? Note: Driving over Pas Nogals now is tedious enough without adding several hundred more automobiles and trucks. Also, the traffic to DVC , Virginia Hills, Chilpancingo Golf Ridge •
8, What is the impact to our schools, power requirements, and sewers? Please provide any information you can and attend the scheduled meeting Wednesday at City Hall at 7:00 P.M.

Sincerely
Buck J. Cheshire
13 Fairway Place
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Edited 22 hr ago • City is considering building 250- 300 apartments ·at Morello and Paso Nogal.

Yesterday, I was told by a neighbor the the City of Pleasant Hill is considering rezoning the 6 acre meadow across the street from me and building a 250-300 apartment complex. I live on Douglas Terrace. Our family has had this house for over 35 years. There are MANY concerns: 1) Why were we not informed by the City? Some home owners have lived here since these houses were , built (1974). They are now elderly and like a safe, quiet neighborhood. 2) There is a sink hole on the 6 acre lot. This is a HUGE safety issue. Anyone can see the sink hole. 3) Where would all of the new residents PARK? 4) Property values will go down. Also, every realtor selling or renting in this area will now have to disclose the proposed apartment complex. 5) Traffic will go up. There will be massive car congestion in this whole area. All of the car exhaust from all of those cars is a health issue. 6) The Paso Nogul dog park will be affected as well as the Hidden Lakes park. More people, more cars, 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2104 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) more dogs. 7) This whole area will become a noisy, congested mess. It will also impact our local shopping areas. 8) The City already has added housing: the latest is at Tylor and Lucille. Before that, it was where the old library stood. If you have an opinion, here are some things that you can do: 1) attend the City Council meeting on May 3 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. 2) attend the meeting via zoom. "he zoom address will be posted on April 28 at www.pleasanthillca.org. 3) Write a statement about how the proposed new apartment complex would affect you and your family. Statements must be received by Wednesday May 3 by 4:00. They can be mailed or dropped-off or emailed. Email your response to [email protected] 4) There is also a petition circulating. 5) Get on the Planning Commission. There is at least one vacancy. I know that there is a huge need for more housing, but I am not convinced that this is the appropriate place for it. Especially since the current homeowners weren't even informed let alone asked for input. Let's make our voices heard! 0 Virus-free.www.avq.com
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2105 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) RE; Development of Apartment Complex -Morello Terrace and Paso Nogal. Correspondence is for public comment at the Commission Meeting Pleasant Hill Planning Commission:

As a long term resident of Pleasant Hill, I wish to express my concern regarding the proposed sites for a 196 Unit Apartment Building and a 102 Unit Apartment Building. The parcels Morello Terrace and Paso Nogal have a moderate to severe slope. To accommodate a building of this size would require extensive excavation. Neither Morello Terrace nor Paso Nogal are served by convenient public transportation. The surrounding streets are hilly and challenging for pedestrians and cyclists. Tenants would be forced to use cars for transportation -thus potentially adding 300 plus cars to our crowded roadways.

Would it be best practice to locate high occupant apartments on level streets serviced by efficient public transportation? Adding generous sidewalks shaded by lines of trees would encourage walking and cycling . Walkable nearby destinations such as libraries, restaurants , shops, bars, or salons would be mutually beneficial. Has the planning commission explored all potential sites in Pleasant Hill ?
The Morello Terrace and Paso Nogal sites are grassy hills which support local wildlife from nearby Paso Nogal park. The surrounding residential area is a mix of one to two story multifamily townhouses and individual homes. Would it be more fitting to blend in similar multifamily housing elements as needed or possibly leave the open space for future generations to enjoy? Sincerely,
T.SteinkirchnerAnderson
Resident of Pleasant Hill

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2106 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
-From:
,ent:

To:

Subject:

Ray Malhotra <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:34 AM
Planning
NO on "Low Income High Density" Housing Project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you reco nize the sender.

As a Resident of Pleasant Hill and Home-Owner on Morello Ave I am extremely appalled at the proposition to build "Low Income High Density" units in an already high density/high volume area. The funding for these projects should be better geared at completing sidewalks and adding crosswalks on Morello Ave to increase safety and protect wildlife. As long as I have been living in this area there have been increasing issues with traffic, flooding, and power outages. It would be better to address these underlying issues instead of "building" on top of them. Some of the few attractive points of living in Pleasant Hill are the open preserved spaces and natural scenery. Building "Low Income High Density" homes will not only take this away but prove detrimental to prospective Home-Owners who are looking to escape overly dense areas. In Summary I think building this project shows ignorance for the real issues that should be addressed and should not even be considered. -Ray Malhotra
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2107 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

MARIKO FRIEDEL <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:28 AM
To: Planning
Subject: Objection to Paso Nogal/Morello High Density Housing project CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

The development on Paso Nogal and Morello would
Dramatically Increase traffic
Tum Pleasant hill Into another Oakland
Lower real estate values for current residents
How does this benefit Pleasant hill?
We need new city council members!!!!
Mariko Friedel
2023 Ellington Ter
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2108 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
/" from:
r ent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Randy < amtmech [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:11 AM
Planning; City Council
Girl Friend; [email protected]; Troy Jones; Steve Houghton Morello Terraces
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Planning commission and City Council,
I'm reaching out because I am aware of the Morello Terraces high density housing proposal that is under consideration.

In my 28 years of being a homeowner in Pleasant Hill and raising children, coaching and being active in the community I have seen enormous growth and the changes in our community that have occurred. I have never spoke out and I am not against change, just changes that are going to be counterproductive to the quality of life where I live.

We have approached the limits of responsible growth in PH and need to think, when does the quality of life start to deteriorate for our families. That being said I think we have reached that point and demand to be heard.

I as well as many of my neighbors believe it is time to pause large new high density housing tracts throughout all of PH and let the already brand new tracts (not occupied or completed construction) settle in for at least 10 years and guage .what is in the best interest and quality of life of the homeowners, families and residents ofthis bedroom Bay Area mmunity. This is what responsible growth should look like.

It's time to put the community quality of life ahead of more density and tax dollars.

Respectfully,
Randy Barisof
2845 Madeira Way
Pleasant Hill, Ca
94523
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2109 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Tom Hill <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:11 AM
Planning
5/3/2023 City Public Hearing / Paso Nogal Rd
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

TO: PH City Planning Dept
I am planning to attend the Public Hearing this evening, but if I cannot attend, I would like to express my concerns about adding additional high density housing in the Paso Nogal neighborhood.

I have owned my residence and lived in the New Falconpointe development for over 20 years. I consider it to be a beautifu~ neighborhood. As time has passed I have noticed far more traffic and less traffic control in all of the surrounding areas. There is also the Paso Nogal Park that gets high use but also has far inadequate parking and poor ingress and egress onto the main street. As a result many cars park along the side of the road in the dirt, creating dangerous situations with cars driving over the speed limit.

I am greatly concerned that adding any new housing - let -alone high density housing - will add to what is already a bad situation.

Are there not any sites within our city that are closer to BART and mass transit or have easier freeway access that would help keep additional traffic and cars off the streets in our neighborhoods? Thank you for your consideration,
Tom Hill
708 Kenton Ct
Pleasant Hill, CA 94507
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2110 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
(
From:
ent:

To:

Subject:

B Q < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:06 AM
Planning
I Oppose High Density Housing Morello/Alhambra
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I oppose the plans for high density housing in the Morello/ Alhambra green space areas. PLEASE vote NO to add more homes and the removal of green spaces that are such a part of what makes Pleasant Hill special and unique. Condensed housing removes that 'livability' of what makes Pleasant Hill appealing. The connection to nature is a big part of the community - to green space, to plants, animals, water, and that life force we all feel and depend upon. It would forever be gone. Forever. This gem of a place to live would be like everywhere else - a place of congestion, cars, noise, concrete. PLEASE do not allow this to happen. Do not destroy us.

Beth Quist
529 Mesa Verde Place
Pleasant Hill, CA
510-882-1490
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2111 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Andrew Keough <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:01 AM
Planning
Morello Terrace Protest Letter
Morello Terrace Protest Letter.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom It May Concern at the City of Pleasant Hill Planning Department, Please see the attached protest letter outlining our objection to the proposed re-zoning of the Morello Terrace hillside.

Thank you for considering this letter and the stress you have brought upon our neighborhood.

Signed,
Andrew Keough
Morello Ct.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2112 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( Crom:
ent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

James Willett <[email protected]>
_ Wednesday, May 3, 2023 8:54 AM
Planning
Proposed Housing Development
Objection Letter.docx
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

James B. Willett, J.D.
302 Valley High Drive
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
May 1, 2023
City of Pleasant Hill
Planning Commission
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
To whom it may concern,
•t has come to my attention that the city of Pleasant Hill is considering rezoning two sites, Morello Terraces . ~PN 154-140-015) and Paso Nogal (APN 152-0101-004} from R20 and R15 single family lots to MRH (Multiplefamily-High Density} and I am writing in opposition to this plan.

Simply stated, the two sites in question are not feasible for high density housing for the following reasons.

First, is a question of access. In order to access the site on Paso Nogal traffic must flow either through Morello Avenue or Alhambra Avenue, both of which are currently highly trafficked, congested routes. In addition to the increased traffic on Morello and Alhambra, consideration must be taken of Paso Nogal road itself. Paso Nogal road is a narrow, winding, two-lane road currently bordered by housing, hiking trails and a dog park, with no shoulders and limited parking even for the park. In order to access the dog park, patrons currently are parking illegally and dangerously partially blocking the r?ad.

The Morello Terraces site maintain the same issues with traffic. In order to access this site, you must either come down Morello from Taylor Boulevard (both of which are currently suffering from congestion issues), cross over Paso Nogal road (see above paragraph for existing issues which would only be worsened by more ~raffic to a new high density housing complex}, approach along Morello from Martinez which is an extremely narrow, winding two-lane road which cannot sustain heavy traffic or approach via Chilpancingo which is also a narrow, winding two-lane road through a residential neighborhood which also cannot sustain heavy traffic.

Second, in addition to increased traffic issues, the proposed developments would also increase both noise and air pollution beyond tolerable levels. There is no viable public transportation available for either site. This -"""eans that if either (or worse both) sites were developed to the capacity suggested (196 units on Morello ~rrace and 102 units on Paso Nogal), you would be adding several hundred private autos to the already crowded streets with increased levels of noise and smog, and multiple studies have shown the deleterious 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2113 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) effects of noise and air pollution on a community's health. Further, the question of parking must be addressed. At neither site would there be street parking available to sustain that many autos. As described above, there is no street parking available on Paso Nogal, and there is no legal street ~arking available at the Morello Terrace site either. I say legal parking because the proposed site on Morello is currently a heavily biked section of road about a quarter of a mile from Hidden Lakes Park. Hidden Lakes Park is home to a thriving baseball/softball league for the City of Martinez, as well as-containing the only artificial turf soccer field in the area where over 2,000 youth and an unknown number of adults play in various leagues year-round.

Parking is already such an issue for the park that parents and participants of the various leagues park illegally in the bike lanes and on the road shoulders (where they exist) and spill over in~o neighboring residential streets. Adding an additional 200-300 cars per day onto these streets is a recipe for disaster.

While there is a need for housing, a more appropriate plan is to develop sites as was done at the Treat Boulevard BART station's transit village. There, all the residents of the high-density housing had easy access to multiple means of public transportation. As noted above, the Morello and Paso Nogal sites do not have viable access to public transportation. Additionally, there is limited access to commercial properties such as grocery stores and pharmacies without driving. The nearest grocery store is located in the Virginia Hills shopping center, which is a mile or more from the Morello Terrace site and slightly less from the Paso Nogal site which necessitates driving which leads to all of the other issues cited above.

Finally, I would like to know if an environmental impact assessment has been performed regarding wildlife in the area of the proposed projects? As a resident of the area, I regularly see turkeys, deer, coyotes, owls, red fox, river otters (in Hidden Lakes Park) and many other forms of wildlife. If the city continues to develop every parcel of land available, these animals will lose their habitats and we will no longer have the joy of their presence.

For all of these reasons, I respectfully object to the proposed projects.

Sincerely,
James B. Willett, J.D.
302 Valley High Drive
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2114 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
crom:
ent:

To:

Subject:
· Nancy Troche <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 8:52 AM
Planning
NO on "Low Income House Density" Housing Project on Paso Nogal and Morello Area CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I am writing to express my opposition to the proposal for low income high density housing on Morello Avenue and Paso Nogal Road. While I understand the need for affordable housing, I believe that this location is not the best option for this area.

Please consider building this project in an area that is closer to Contra Costa Blvd. where there are many empty commercial buildings (i.e., the JcPenney store, the Orchards Supply store and soon Bed Bath & Beyond) that are either currently empty or will be empty.

Again, please reconsider this proposal for low income high density housing. I believe that there are alternative solutions that can address the issue of affordable housing without compromising the well-being of our community. Thank you.

Thank you.

Nancy Troche
Valley High Homeowner
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2115 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mary Hu < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 8:37 AM
Planning
Additional Housing Units near Morello
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hi,
I would like to say I am against having this many units added to the 2 areas near Paso Nogal. My child is attending Valhalla Elementary in the fall and we couldn't get a spot for the onsite afterschool care. If alot more families move into the area I'm afraid they won't even have the resources to continue working if they wanted to because of the lack of aftercare in the area.

I would like to make sure in the plan there is funding put aside to help mitigate issues like this where the current infrastructure and schools cannot support an influx of people.

Thanks,
Mary Hu
Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2116 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
,,- -=rom:
f ent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:
irena Trajkovski < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 8:31 AM
· Planning
Branko Trajkovski
Concern re: low income high density units - plan impacts children safety CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hi,
Please allow us to express our utmost concern for the 'low income high density' units plan between Morelo Avenue -Alhambra Avenue - Paso Nogal.

This is a critical zone for commute to Valhalla Elementary School and often a choking point even with the current capacity. Adding more units and traffic will endanger the kids safety for school commute.

We kindly request that you consider an alternate location that will not impact children ability to safely and timely get the school.

Thank you kindly,
~e Trajkovski Family
Irena E. Trajkovski
IrenaTrajkovski.com
Linkedln I Twitter
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2117 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 8:27 AM
Planning
opposition to high additional housing in Pleasant Hill
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed high-density, low-income housing development in Pleasant Hill. As a resident of this community, I value .the natural beauty and open space of our city, and I believe that this development would be detrimental to the character and quality of life in our neighborhood.

While I understand the need for affordable housing in our area, I do not believe that this development is the solution. The proposed project would bring a significant increase in population density to an area that is currently characterized by its spaciousness and natural beauty. This would result in increased traffic congestion, noise pollution, and a general degradation of the quality of life for residents.

Furthermore, the proposed development would alter the character of the neighborhood in a way that is not in keeping with the surrounding area. The natural beauty of our community is one of the things that makes Pleasant Hill such a desirable place to live, and I believe that we shou\d prioritize preserving this asset rather than sacrificing it for the sake of affordable housing.

In addition to these concerns, I worry that the proposed development could have negative impacts on property values in the surrounding area. I believe that the introduction of a high-density, low-income housing development could deter potential buyers and lead to a decline in property values for existing homeowners.

In conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the proposed development in Pleasant Hill. I believe that there are better ways to address the need for affordable housing in our community that do not involve sacrificing the natural beauty and character of our city. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Michael Madsen
[email protected]
Resident of Pleasant Hill since 1995.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2118 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( S::rom:
.!nt:

To:

Subject:

Paula Wong <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 8:22 AM
Planning
Opposition to high density housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless ou recognize the sender.

Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed high-density, low-income housing development in Pleasant Hill. As a resident of this community, I value the natural beauty and open space of our city, and I believe that this deyelopment would be detrimental to the character and quality of life in our neighborhood.

Furthermore, the proposed development would alter the character of the neighborhood in a way that is not in keeping with the surrounding area. The natural beauty of our community is one of the things that makes Pleasant Hill such a desirable place to live, and I believe that we should prioritize preserving this asset rather ·'¼an sacrificing it for the sake of affordable housing.

Sincerely,
Paula Wong
925-639-9139
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2119 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kevin Bric <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 8:17 AM
Planning
High density/low income housing opinion from a local resident CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern,
My wife and I were alerted to the city's plans to add high density/low income housing on 2 locations in the Morello/Paso Nogal area and want to share our opinion.

We unequivocally reject the idea of moving forward with the housing units. With all of the development nearby on Taylor, near the PH library and on Pleasant Hill Road we don't see the need to further pack the area with more residents.

Also, how will Valhalla Elementary handle the massive influx of students? Our children already have a student/teacher ratio of at least 30/1 with no assistance. The influx of new students would send that even higher, compromising our children's education.

We have spoken to at least 20 other families directly in the area impacted by this decision and they have all expressed deep concern and frustration with the idea of adding these housing units. The common thread in the discussions has been, "With a more crowded neighborhood and an influx of students into a school system that clearly not equipped for it, we'd likely look at moving." Please consider this request as an opinion shared by many neighbors who have been living here for a long time and invest heavily in the community.

Kevin Bric
Virginia Hills
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2120 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( From:
,ent:

To:

Subject:

Emily Rose <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 6:45 AM
Planning
Morello/ Paso Nogal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

As a College Park HS senior, I am shocked that you would put high density housing on Morello. Traffic is already a nightmare and there are zero transit options. You are putting low-income households in an area that lacks access to public transit, and the cost savings from the affordable housing will be entirely offset by transportation expenses from dependency on automobiles! You will then burden the roads, city services, schools, with unsustainable development. High density housing belongs near transit! Let's use the infrastructure already in place that can support development: somewhere along 680 and/or Contra Costa. Morello/Paso Nogal is NOT able to support more traffic, people, students, etc. There are smarter, better options! Keep our open space open! Build where pavement is already installed. Don't pave over our beautiful (and rare) open spaces! Doing so is simply irrational and wrong!
Sincerely,
Emily Berta
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2121 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

K Barrett <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 6:33 AM
Planning
Against planned Paso Nogal housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello Planning Committee,
I am against the planned housing units along Paso Nagai in Pleasant Hill. The Morello Terraces site is too steep to place any units. Although the ground may be sandstone it isn't secure enough for multiple units.

If it was it would have been built on before this. The Paso Nagai site is inaccessible to fire trucks. The city wasn't able to repave the road as wide as they wanted nor as nicely as residents wants. Traffic will be impossible there. People have wondered whether there's enough room in local schools for more students in - these areas.

The City of Pleasant Hill had the opportunity to build affordable housing but chose instead to allow a Car Max to be built.

These days with retail stores closing throughout the country and people not going into office buildings perhaps the City should consider the downtown Crescent Drive area for affordable housing with freeway access. Beds Baths and Beyond is closing. The major tenants haven't been able to fill the Orchard space.

Restaurants have an augmented reality with Door Dash delivery, so square footage for their operations is smaller. An idea in the last election was to turn the parking lot by Verizon into a park.

Perhaps the City should learn from their previous mistakes and face the new reality of retail empty storefronts. Build houses where its flat, close to freeways and infrastructure. (schools, sewers, electrical, storm drains).

Kathleen Barrett
280 Fernwood Dr
Pleasant Hill
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2122 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
irom:
ent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

JY Nakagawa < s [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 6:32 AM
Troy Fujimoto
Planning; [email protected]
Pleasant Hill 2040 Plan Morello Terraces
Ridgeview letter 050223.DSS.doc
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

See attached
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2123 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) DATE:

TO:

FROM:

RE:

May 2, 2023
Pleasant Hill Planning Commission
J. Y. Nakagawa
2040 General Plan
The purpose of this letter is to voice my objections and serious concerns regarding the pending proposal to rezone open space properties that include Morello Terraces and a vacant site on Paso Nogal. My husband and I were recently made aware of a proposal to rezone the open nature space at the comer of Morello and Netherby (Morello Terraces), in order to accommodate a four-story apartment complex to include 196 dwelling units.

This letter is to specifically address my concerns regarding the purposed rezoning of Morello Terraces, as noted in the Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan.

Of particular concern is that, in reviewing the Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan, there is no evidence of any well-considered rationale regarding the selection of Morello Terraces as a site to build 196 apartments. There is also no evidence that the Planning Commission entertained any discussion or consideration of alternative locations for the proposed apartment complex. Also evident is, there are no documented analyses available to the , community-at~larg regarding the environmental impact of such a proposed building site.

There is also no reference to any community input regarding consideration of rezoning Morello Terraces, including those in the community who live adjacent to the open nature space. Moreover, there appears to be no data to suggest other alternative sites were seriously considered.

The following are a number of issues and concerns:

Unfathomable drastic increase in traffic flow and parking limitations: A four-story apartment complex with 196 units will increase the number of vehicles that will cause Morello Avenue ( currently a generally heavily trafficked thoroughfare, particularly during commute .time) to change from a simple traffic capillary to a major artery.

Moreover, the assumption that 196 apartments would only equate to about 200 vehicles is simply ridiculous. One must assume that there could be up to, at least, two vehicles per dwelling, which will significantly negatively impact street parking adjacent to this proposed complex.

For the over forty years that my husband and I have resided in our home (adjacent to Morello Avenue), even.with the single-family dwelling expansion over these years, it has not resulted in any notable problematic traffic congestion, with the exception of certain hours of the day ( commuting/rush hour). If the 2040 General Plan rezoning proposal is approved, it would not take any person's prescient perspectives to predict· that Morello A venue would rapidly evolve to become a major thoroughfare to access nearby highways and freeways resulting in considerable daily traffic congestion.

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2124 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) r
DATE: May 2, 2023
TO:

FROM:

Pleasant Hill Planning Commission
J. Y. Nakagawa
RE: 2040 General Plan
One might argue that residents of the proposed apartment complex could use public transportation rather than private vehicles. However, there are limits regarding developing and/or increasing public transportation lines (Senate Bill 10), making it very likely that private vehicles will instead be used-hence, making more traffic nightmare.

Environmental and wildlife habitat concerns: The area the planning commission wants to rezone is open space land and is essential for the preservation of wildlife habitat. My husband and I live across the street from an open space area that includes oak trees that provide needed shelter for wildlife-wildlife that we observe on an almost daily basis.

To destroy the open nature space (Morello Terraces) in order to build a multi-story apartment complex is not only stealing from wildlife their habitat (and thus exacerbate their struggle to survive), but is also stealing from human inhabitants the pleasure they receive from living in such a splendid environment.

To emphasize, a decision to rezone for housing is foolhardy, especially when there are other options in Pleasant Hill, in terms of properties on which to build multi-story unit housing.

Drastic Degradation of Quality of Life: The area surrounding the open nature space on the comer of Morel_lo and Netherby, as well as the area known as Paso No gal, are mostly single-family dwellings. The addition of almost 200 apartment units on a fairly small area of land will have a severe impact with respect to the bucolic quality of life for people and wildlife. Moreover, the increase in population will also increase demands on public services ( e.g. police, fire department).

In summary, my husband and I strongly object to any rezoning proposed by the Pleasant Hill Planning Commission, as we both believe this is the antithesis of good planning.

Respectfully submitted,
J. Y. Nakagawa
431 Ridgeview Drive
Pleasant Hill, California 94523
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2125 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Yumi Hunt <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 4:04 AM
Planning
Concerns about low income high density home plans
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern:

I oppose to the city plan about low income high density housing projects near Paso Nogal Rd & Morello Ave.

Reasons are -

1. No public transportation
This is a very small area where there are not major access roads or public transportations. Because of Diablo valley college by, there are already heavy traffic exists in various residential roads around this area. High density houses coming to this small area will cause more traffic.

These high density houses should be built near public transportation (BART) access.

2. Too many houses in the small area
The area is built for low density houses. Not only roads but als<? stores and other services are not built for high population.

3. Environment impact
Concerning about loosing open space, I oppose to the plan which destroy natural habitat.

Regards,
Yumi Hunt (Pleasant Hill resident)
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2126 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r ~rom:
ent:

To:

Subject:

Reggie < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:02 AM
Planning
Objection to high density housing on and around Morello ave CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I don't understand the logic behind developing high density housing so far from any Bart station. This type of development should be happening on the other side of town near pleasant hill Bart.

The area has very poor ingress and egress options for cars and adding the volume of cars this will bring will cripple traffic in the area.

Also building so near a main open space access point will negatively impact the quality of life for current residents.

Also the size, of the development is not representative of the other developments in the area.

Reginald Hunt
Pasa Tiempo Ct
Pleasant Hill CA 94523
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2127 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

John Sasaki <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:52 AM
Planning
Alex Khalfin; Celia Chiang; Brendan Cheney; [email protected]; Diana Vavrek; Chadwick Wyler
Master Planned Paso Nogal Developments
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Chair Khalfin, Vice Chair Chiang, and Pleasant Hill Planning Commissioners, I reach out tonight with warm greetings, and I hope all of you are doing well.

Unfortunately, I'm contacting you under less than ideal circumstances for everyone in my neighborhood. I am sure you are hearing from lots of my neighbors because of what came as a major shock to everyone who lives along Paso Nogal on the northwest end of town. ·
First, a little background. I moved to Pleasant Hill in September 1998, almost 25 years ago, and have loved living in the New Falconpointe development along Paso Nogal ever since.

The peaceful setting is what drew me here, with its rolling hills and open spaces. We have lots of turkeys, raccoons, skunks, deer, and the occasional coyote. And there's a drainage ditch on the edge of our development that's filled with frogs.

Up Paso Nogal from my house is the wonderful Paso Nogal Park with its playspaces for dogs, and great hiking trails with their spectacular views. It's an idyllic spot, and one which has always afforded me peace of mind because we always knew it would remain in a more pristine state. But this week, I got the news that the Pleasant Hill Master Plan has something else entirely in store for our neighborhood, and frankly, I am appalled.

I have learned that not only are there plans for one big new apartment complex nearby, but two, one on each side of our development. The one closest to me would be down Paso Nogal towards Alhambra where there is an area of open space. I have heard the plan is for 90-136 apartments to go up there. On the other side, the plan, as I understand it, would be for the comer of Paso Nogal and Morello on the hillside on the northwest comer.

There would be between 17 4 and 262 apartments going up on that space.

If, in each case, it was even on the low end, so 90 and 174 units, that would bring about a cataclysmic shift for our neighborhood. First off, I would be surprised if there are as many as 100 homes in the developments that currently line Paso Nogal. New Falconpointe has just over 50. So, one apartment complex could more than double the number of homes here, radically change the amount of people in the area, and increase the amount of traffic immensely. Paso Nogal is already a busy street that a lot of area residents use as a thoroughfare. Adding hundreds of cars to the area will only serve to clog up our streets, pollute our air and make living here significantly more noisy and challenging. All that would happen if just one of the developments goes in.

And the city thinks that two developments that could collectively quadruple the ·number of homes here is a good thing? Not to mention that along our street, and in fact, along most of both Alhambra and Morello, there is no high density housing. I am curious why the city wants to make such a radical change to the quality of life for s, many longtime, dedicated residents of the Paso Nogal corridor and the surrounding neighborhoods. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2128 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Believe me, I know well how much the entire Bay Area needs housing, and affordable housing at that. But our city should not be shouldering the responsibility for housing hundreds (maybe close to 1000?) of new residents ".ln its own, and certainly not in one small area.

In the end, building either one of these developments will completely change the feel of the neighborhood in countless ways, and I would bet that none of you would want something like this going up within several hundred yards of your home. But imagine this: two major apartment complexes going up, one on either side of you, surrounding your small peaceful housing development. I cannot think of anything that would be more unappealing to any resident in any neighborhood.

Adding one complex will increase traffic, noise, and pollution, naturally bring more crime to the area, and in the end, drive down property values along Paso Nogal and in the surrounding neighborhoods. Adding two complexes would be exponentially worse. There simply isn't room to quadruple the amount of residents in our area.

I humbly ask each of you to reconsider this plan, because while the complexes would provide transitory housing . for people who would come and go in the neighborhood, it will potentially ruin the entire area for people like myself who have planned to spend our golden years in this city that we love so much.

Please feel free to call me with any questions. Thank you for your consideration.

John Sasaki
Strayhorn Road
New Falconpointe
_Pleasant Hill
10-406-3729
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2129 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mark Flynn <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:32 AM
Planning
Intensity Housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I'm writing in advance of tonight's meeting regarding the possibility of building low income housing/high density in the Paso Nagai area. I live in the Wildflower neighborhood and strongly disagree with any increase to housing in the area.

Paso Nogal Rd is constantly used as a cut through between Morello and Pleasant Hill Rd making pulling in and out of side streets extremely difficult. In addition, when they can, people frequently travel at excessive speed between the two roads. Adding additional housing would be untenable and turn the beautiful hillsides into an area filled with congestion completely changing the environment and reason why we all live in the area.

Mark Flynn
202 Primrose Place
Pleasant Hill, Ca. 94523
Finally,
Sent from my iPad
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2130 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) <[email protected]>; Chadwick Wyler ([email protected]) <[email protected]>; Darien Key <[email protected]>; David Field <[email protected]>; Jihawna Johnson <[email protected]> Cc: Ethan Bindernagel <[email protected]>; Lyone Conner <[email protected]>
Subject: Additional Public Comments
Commissioners,
Attached are additional public comments for this evening.

Troy
********************
Troy Fujimoto
City Planner
City of Pleasant Hill
925-671-5224

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2131 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
crom:
( ent:

To:

Subject:

Jilla <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 11:35 PM
Planning
My OBJECTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FOUR STORY,MULTI-BUILDING, 196-Unit APARTMENT COMPLEX ON MORELLO TERRACE- FILE_ 1638
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: The Planning Commission of City of Pleasant Hill
From: Dr. Jilla Behnam
Owner of the property located at:
77 Janin Pl.

Pleasant Hill, CA 94524
Hello,
I strongly OBJECT to the development of:

A FOUR STORY,MULTI-BUILDING,
196-Unit APARTMENT COMPLEX ON MORELLO TERRACE.

It is totally wrong for the city of Pleasant Hill to rezone the Morello Terraces (open nature space at corner of Morello & Netherby) hillside to accommodate a four story apartment complex to contain 196 dwelling units. ie Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan provides no rationale for the selection of the Morello Terraces over other available lots, nor. is there any insight to the "Planning Teams" consideration of alternative lots/ strategies analysis of impact to the surrounding environment, and adherence to surrounding community input.

I strongly object to the Planning Commission's complete neglect of input from the surrounding communities as well_ as the non-existent consideration of alternative strategies/analysis of impact.

The Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan makes NO discussion/analysis of the following critical issues:
1- Drastic increase in traffic flux:

It is reasonable to assume most tenants would have an additional car which the complex would not accommodate resulting in drastic overspill of vehicle parking Into neighboring streets such as Douglas Terrace, St Germain Place, Netherby Street, Netherby Place, Janin Place,Fairway Place, Morello Avenue, Ridgeview Drive, Ridgeview Place. This lot is not a transit rich area per Senate Bill 10, therefore it is reasonable to assume cars would be the residents primary form of transportation.
2-Complete degradation of the environment/wildlife habitat since the entire hillside will be excavated. This hillside is an important corridor for local coyote, opossum, raccoon, deer, turkey, and ground squirrel populations to migrate between Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nogal Park. Without the ability to traverse this plot, roadkill events will continue to Increase and further decimate our local wlldlife population.

The excavation of this hillside will also transform a mild/moderate natural gradient slope to a vertical gradient to - -commodate a four-story, multi-building complex which would require thousands of gallons of diesel fuel needed to Jde the slopes. This destruction of open-space land Is absolutely at odds with the guidance set forth In Government Code 65400.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2132 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) 3- Severe disruption of the surrounding housing privacy/uniformly. The proposed four-story apartment complex would be completely singular in its density, architectures, and land usage compared to the surrounding area. The resulting increase in population density would negate the intended surrounding building edges, transition, context, and privacy.

I request the Planning Commission to seriously consider my objections.

Sincerely,
Jilla Behnam, Ph.D.
www.Tamarkoz.org
Behn a [email protected]
Tel:(925) 989-6129
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2133 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r from:

Jent:

To:

Subject:

Oanh Vu <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 11 :16 PM
Planning
Low income high density Housing on Morello and Paso Nogal and Morello & Alhambra CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear City of Pleasant Hill Council Chambers,
We live on Morello Ave and Kiki Dive since 2019. We are against the proposal location of the housing project. We have witnessed increased speeding and noise especially at nights. We have seen Motorcycle policemen on Morello Ave in the area to catch speeding cars! In fact, another car accident happened recently in April 2023, just couple houses down from our house as a result of speed that knocked down the electric pole (right at corner Viking and Morello Ave).

We have a lot people, especially kids walking from home and to Valhalla elementary school, Pleasant Hill middle school and College Park high school and DVC, and with this project will only increase more traffic congestion and accidents, not to mention more crimes and drugs.

There are already many apartments surrounding the area, such as the ones near DVC on Viking/Norse Dr and Camelback apartments. More people will create more noise and more problems and can affect local businesses as well because of potential more store robberies!
i addition, Hidden lake park and Pasol Nogal park already have drawn a lot of people to visit the area. Please, NO MORE people, noise, traffic, crimes and speeding! We bought our house for safety, good school and quite reasons but only have been feeling that we have made a big mistake for the price we paid for the property.

Thank you for your consideration to hear our voice.

Sincerely,
Oanh Vu & Phong Le
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2134 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Beverly Hinken <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10:54 PM
Planning
Proposed High Density Housing on Paso Nogal & Morello Ave.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I am writing to express my shock and disbelief upon hearing that the City of Pleasant Hill's Planning Committee is proposing to rezone the open space at Morello and N etherby to accommodate a four-story apartment complex. Why am I just hearing about this? Why is it that this was not publicly announced? I own a home within 1/4 mile of both proposed developments, and never in my wildest dreams would I have believed that the city would deem it appropriate to build high density housing in this lot. This is a quiet residential area that is beloved for its natural beauty and tranquility. Adding a four-story apartment complex will negatively impact everything in the area - it will bring increased traffic, increased air and noise pollution, the list goes on.

Adding hundreds of cars and people to such a small area does not make any sense - it is not in line with what currently exists here, it will not benefit the community in any way - it will only degrade the quality of the neighborhood.- Where will the hundreds of extra cars park?! This is not an area with easy·access to public transit. Morello and adjacent streets would resemble a downtown area with cars parked all along the streets because surely the developments will not adequately accommodate tenants' cars. Paso Nogal Road, which is one lane in each direction, would not be able to safely support such an increase in cars and traffic. The environment and local wildlife would also suffer from the loss of open space.

I find it hard to believe that any resident of Pleasant Hill would even consider this to be a good idea. Let's kee1 our quiet and pleasant community pleasant! I should not need to remind you that you are working on behalf of the community and should serve the best interest of your constituents.

Our family moved to this area specifically for its natural beauty and open space. We paid top dollar to live here.

This should not be overlooked or ignored. This plan that you are trying to quietly pass is anything but in the best interest of this community.

Beverly (& John) Hinken
704 Tonstad Place
Pleasant Hill
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2135 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r "!rom:
,ent:

To:

Subject:

Bryan Chin <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10:21 PM
Planning
Housing Development Plan Opposition
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom It May Concern,
I am a resident who lives near the proposed low-incoming, high density housing development plan at Wildflower Dr and Paso Noga I Rd and at the corner of Morello and Paso Noga I. I am opposed to the current plan to develop this area for low-income housing. This is my first house that me and my brother purchased after he moved back to California from being away at school for many years. I believe that this development will have a negative impact on the quality of life, safety and property values of the residents in the surrounding neighborhoods.

First of all, low-income housing may also bring crime, drugs and violence to our peaceful and law-abiding neighborhood.

I do not want to live in fear of being robbed, assaulted or harassed by strangers who do not belong here.

Secondly, low-income housing will degrade the environment and aesthetics of our surroundings. They will also lower the property values of the nearby homes, which will hurt the homeowners who have invested a lot of money and effort into their properties. I do not want to see my hard-earned wealth diminished by this. 1irdly, low-income housing will be a burden on the public resources and services that we pay for with our taxes. The residents of low-income housing will consume more water, electricity, gas and garbage disposal than the average household. They will also demand more police, fire, health and education services than they contribute to. This will strain the already limited budget and resources of the city and force us to pay higher taxes or receive lower quality services. I do not want to subsidize the living expenses of people who do not work hard or pay their fair share.

For these reasons, I need you to reject the proposal for low-income housing near my home and find a more suitable location. We deserve to have a say in what happens in our neighborhood.

Thank you for your time and consideration. If you or your office would like to contact me, I have my contact information at the bottom of this email.

Thanks,
Bryan
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2136 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Richard Chen <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10:20 PM
Planning
Objection to planned rezoning
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern,
My name is Linda Zhu, homeowner in the Douglas Terrace neighborhood. I'm writing you this email to lodge my opposition to the proposed rezoning of the vacant lots located at Morello Terraces (APN 154-140-015) and Paso Nogal (APN 152-010-004). One thing I love most about my neighborhood is the quietness and tranquility, we are only a block away from Morello yet we don't hear much of the road noise. All the houses coexist in harmony, there are wild turkeys and deers roaming around, kids can play outside without much adult supervision because there rarely is any traffic on our street. Title 18.125.070 Limitations on residential rezoning clearly states that "The city of Pleasant Hill shall not rezone any area or property zoned for residential use to increase density or change land use unless the following conditions are met:

A. Development of the area or property to be rezoned shall not have growth-inducing impacts on existing residential neighborhoods;
/
B. Development of the area or property to be rezoned shall not have a significant traffic impact on existing residential neighborhoods; and
C. Development of the area or property to be rezoned shall not have a significant noise impact on existing residential neighborhoods. (Ord. 938 § 10, 2020; Ord. 710 § 35-34.12, 1996; 1991 code§ 35-34.12)" More importantly, "This provision was adopted by an initiative measure passed by the voters of the City of Pleasant Hill on June 3, 1986," i.e. this was amended by the people of Pleasant Hill, not some bureaucrats. If the Planning Commision and the City Council adopte the rezoning proposal, it will be a clear indication that the Commision and Council members do not respect the will of the voters.

I hope that the Planning Commission and City Council will hear the voices of the people and table the proposed rezoning. Thank you.

Regards,
Linda Zhu
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2137 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( i:rom:
ent:

To:

Subject:

Chelsea Azevedo <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:54 PM
Planning
No to paso nogel / morello housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello,
I am very against adding the proposed housing due to the large influx of traffic this will bring. I do not approve of this and would like to ensure my voice is heard
Chelsea azevedo
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2138 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Suhr < [email protected] >
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:42 PM
Planning
Paso Nogal/Morello housing plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Residents from 600 Kiki Dr
This area is not suitable for these kind of homes. We understand that there is need for housing but what you are proposing for this area is completely improper.

The proposed development is supposed to be appropriate for the area. There is no high density housing in this area. This development would adversely affect all the properties around it.

There are no public transit routes (bus etc). Traffic on Morello and Paso Nogal is already heavy as it is due to people using it as a thoroughfare. People race through the stop signs and speed on Morello constantly. Case in point: car crash Apr 18th, at 2136 Morello at 930pm. Car went THROUGH a power pole hit a low brickwall and went through a front yard and ended up in the hedgerow to the next property. This in a 30mph zone ...

How do you propose to change the traffic rules? How do you plari to mitigate traffic due to construction? How are you going to compensate for lost property value?
Also as proposed "low income, high density housing" population typically would be less likely to have private transportation; there are no shops within walking distance (meaning grocery stores etc.) Environmental impact report?
Did the city do due diligence with proposal signage? Haven't seen one anywhere prominently displayed, wheR can I find the information on where the signage as required was posted? (Large A-frame signs at promine~t intersections?)
Did the city consider redeveloping an office building into such housing? Where can I find such research if it was done? Supposed to encourage business zones to also include affordable housing. Also such areas would be closer to shops and businesses.

Thank you
Samuel Yoshioka
Miki Yoshioka
Michael Suhr
600 Kiki Dr
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2139 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
--.-om:
.ent:

To:

Subject:

Jeff McGraw <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:41 PM
Planning
Planned High Density Housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Planning Committee,
I am a resident of Diablo Valley Estates in Pleasant Hill, and I'm writing to oppose the plans for high density housing in the open spaces of Paso Nogal and Morello Ave. This proposal will add significant traffic congestion in the area, especially on Paso Nogal's two lane road. The four way stop at the Paso Nogal / Morello intersection is already congested in the mornings and evenings with commuters and students. The plans will also disrupt the land that supports wildlife, biodiveristy and community recreation (hiking, biking, etc.). My children's classroom sizes at the local schools are already exceeded, and adding this housing and population will only burden an already strained teacher student ratio.

I implore you to consider all factors when deciding on this project, and I urge you to vote NO on these plans.

Sincerely,
Jeff McGraw I Production Mgr II
Bio-Rad Laboratories I Global Supply Chain
f [email protected]
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2140 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mike Berta <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:32 PM
Planning
Planning Commission Meeting for May 3rd, 2023 - For Public Comment CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern,
I am writing to voice my opposition to the Planning Commission's plan to rezone the property at the comer of Morello and Paso Nogal from single family to very high density. I understand and support the need for creating more housing in Pleasant Hill, but this is the wrong location to build very high density housing. I live in the house at the comer of Morello and Paso Nogal and I am nearly hit everyday when exiting my driveway because of the traffic congestion in the area, especially during school starting and ending times.

The streets in this area can't handle the additional traffic brought by very high density housing being added to the area. Additionally, there is no public transportation in the area and services are not near by, which forces new residents to rely on their cars.

Adding very high density housing to the comer of Morello and Paso Nogal is akin to forcing a square peg into a round hole. The surrounding area is all zoned single family homes and includes open space that does not fit with an island of very high density apartment buildings as envisioned by the Planning Commission. I support high density housing but only in locations that make sense.

Very high density housing belongs near transportation hubs and services that can accommodate the increased population. This location is the wrong location for very high density housing. My position is not based on NIMBYism or fear, but rather on my experience as a construction expert and my education. I consult on project development and construction, and I have a Business degree with a minor in City and Regional Planning from the University of California, Berkeley.

Sincerely,
Michael Berta
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2141 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
, ll""om:
~nt:

To:

Subject:

Avon Manney <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 6:57 PM
Planning
re: City Public Hearing 5/3/23
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom It May Concern,
Among the first concerns would be that Paso Nogal Road is one lane and Morello Avenue is 2 lanes becoming one lane after crossing Paso Nogal Road. With the proposal to bringl,000 or more people to these areas would mean more cars in these areas. This would create traffic jams especially on Paso Nogal Road which has only 2 arteries leading onto Morello Avenue and Pleasant Hill Road. This would also raise concerns for increased risk of car and pedestrian accidents.

The second concern is that this area is not close to transportation and freeways which means that having a car would be a necessity. Also, each additional unit of housing would mean more water consumption and an increased burden on the water shortage in California. There would be displacement of the natural wildlife such as plants and animals which would create shifts and fluctuations in the ecosystem.

Historically, when there are people living in crowded conditions described in the proposal to build high density housing the rate of deviant behaviors increases. This may put an unnecessary burden on the police force which is already stretched thin .
. nank you,
Avon Manney
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2142 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Laura Bentley <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:27 PM
Planning
Against low-income high-density housing off of Paso Nogal (both locations) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern,
My name is Laura Bentley and I live at 14 Halten Ct, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523. I received a flyer today alerting me to the proposal to build low-income high-density housing in 2 open spaces off of/near Paso Nogal Road. I understand there is a City Council meeting on May 3rd to discuss this with the community but I cannot make it.

As a nearby homeowner who drives, walks and runs Morello and Paso Nogal roads, I am against this proposal for the following reasons.
(1) Increased traffic: I walk my daughter to and from school every day and there is already a lot of traffic on the road in relation to commuters and school drop-offs. The 4-way stops were not designed to accommodate more traffic than what they do and the increased car traffic poses a safety issue for the primary and secondary school kids walking to and from school.
(2) Increased crime: Building low-income high-density units in this area heightens the chances of unwanted crime, from graffiti to theft. I have concerns with the location being near Paso Nogal Park and the community college in terms of potential issues.
(3) Decreased property values: we moved to Pleasant Hill for numerous reasons, investment being one. This· housing is likely to negatively impact the projected value of our home.

I'd like to know what other areas were considered for low-income high-density housing. I believe it's something Pleasant Hill can accommodate but wonder why this wasn't considered when IM+ houses went up near the new library. That area seems more ideal being near buses, grocery store and shops plus the library and sports fields.

I will try and join the meeting via Zoom tomorrow but also wanted to express my concern about this proposal. I am also frustrated that I never received anything from the city about this proposal but had to rely on neighbors going door to door with flyers or posting notices on Facebook groups and Nextdoor to learn about it.

Sincerely,
Laura Bentley
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2143 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
S:rom:
ent:

To:

Subject:

Lora belle Cook < [email protected] >
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:25 PM
Planning
Residents Against the Development of Apartment Complex on Morello Terrace CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Planning Commissioners,
We are writing in opposition to the proposed development of the apartment complex at the comer of Morello and Netherby. As a 5- year resident of Morello Heights, we are concerned about the increasing population and crime along this corridor of Pleasant Hill.

Thirty-plus luxury homes have been newly built along Taylor Boulevard and we cannot add any more housing to an already-developed neighborhood. The proposed 196-unit apartment will severely disrupt the ~urrounding housing privacy, increase traffic, and will have a detrimental impact on wildlife habitat. We are against this project and we do not support this proposal.

Thank you,
Lorabelle and David Cook
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2144 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:21 PM
Planning
Morello Terraces & Paso Nogal projects! This correspondence is for public comment at the commission meeting.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Planning Commission
This correspondence is for public comment at the commission meeting.

No! To The Morello terraces & Paso Nogal projects!
Due to existing zoning map and all the multiple alternative locations. With the correct zoning and resources to absorb these high density projects.

The infrastructure for these projects would not support the additional impacts to the utilities, water, power, gas, sewer I storm drainage system, parking, public transportation, traffic flow, health care facilities, education, City services & etc ......

Additionally the impact to existing wild life population that thrives here would be devastating. Not to mention all of us homeowners that have made sacrifices and huge investment to live here for this quality of life.

Please leave the current R-15 & R-20 zoning in place, It is the best solution.

Sincerely
Michael Forsberg
606 Miles Court
Pleasant Hill CA 94523
Sent from my iPad
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2145 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( icrom:
"ent:

To:

Subject:

Ricky Platt < [email protected] >
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:16 PM
Planning
Objection to plans to redevelop close to Paso Nogal park CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to you as a resident of 14 Halten Court, Pleasant Hill.

The reason for my email is to object to the proposed redevelopment of two parcels of land, being on Paso Noga I between Morello Avenue and Alhambra, and o·n Morello Avenue near the corner of Paso Noga I.

Packed in homes that are for low-income persons is not what the area needs. Instead, the area needs to keep its green areas in place, or restrict development to three or four bedroom single family homes that are each on their own private lot.

I strongly object to any and all low-income housing in the area.

Thank you,
.cky Platt
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2146 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Shirley Woodhull <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:10 PM
Planning
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

May 2,2023
To: Pleasant Hill Planning Committee:

I strongly object to the proposal to re-zone the Morello Terrace (open nature space at corner of Morello and Netherby hillside to accommodate a four story apartment complex to contain 196 dwelling units (apartments); and proposal including plans for the identical re-zoning to a vacant site on Paso Nogal.

I object for the following reasons:

Drastic increase in traffic flux: It is reasonable to assume most tenants would have an additional car, which the complex would not accommodate, resulting in drastic overspill of vehicle parking into neighboring streets. This lot is not a transit rich area per Senate Bill 10; therefore it is reasonable to assume cars would be the residents primary form of transportation.

Additionally, morning and afternoon traffic is already heavy on Morello Avenue due to drivers driving to Diablo Valley' College, College Park High School, Valley View Middle School and Valhalla Elementary School.

Complete degradation of the environment/wildlife habitat (the entire hillside will be excavated): This hillside is an important corridor for local coyote, opossum, raccoon, deer, turkey, and ground squirrel populations to migrate between Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nogal Park. Without the ability to traverse this plot, roadkill events will continue to increase and further decimate our local wildlife population. The excavation of this hillside will also transform a mild/moderate natural gradient slope to a vertical gradient to accommodate a four-story, multi building complex, which would require thousands of gallons of diesel fuel needed to grade the slopes.

This destruction of open-space land is seemingly at odds with the guidance set forth in Government Code 65400; " ... practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plan, so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources ... " Severe disruption of the surrounding housing privacy/uniformity: The proposed four-story apartment complex would be completely at odds with the surrounding area. The resulting increase in population density would negate the intended surrounding building edges, transition, context, and privacy.

It seems to me that the rezoning of Morello Terraces (and Paso Nagai) benefits the "Planning Committee's" future claim of political achievements and the Corporate Builders density tax credits, while completely neglecting the impact to the surrounding area and constituents.

Sincerely,
Shirley Woodhull
344 Ridgeview Drive,
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2147 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
""'.irom:
ent:

To:

Subject:

Linda Pickett <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:01 PM
Planning
High Density Low Income Housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

My husband and I are writing this email to explain why this plan is so upsetting to us. Two years ago we sold our beautiful home in San Carlos because they allowed high density low income housing that RUINED San Carlos. We had hoped that home would be our forever home but the traffic, parking, influx of more people chased a lot of people out of San Carlos. Home values also suffered. We chose Pleasant Hill as our forever home two years ago and now this proposal.

It's not what we had hoped would happen again as we just retired. Please please rethink this proposal and try to find another area for this plan. There are other areas in Pleasant Hill more suitable for this plan. Please leave this quiet area as it is now.

Linda and Kyle Pickett
312 Primrose Dr
Pleasant Hill
Sent from my iPad
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2148 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

JOANNE DURKEE <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 8:53 PM
Planning
Two page letter from Madeira Heights HOA
Madeira Heigths Ltr Page 1 jpeg; Madeira Heights Ltr page twojpeg CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2149 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) May 2, 2023
Alex Khalfin, Chair of City of Pleasant Hill Planning Commission Celia Chiang, Vice Chair
Brendan Cheney, Member
David Field, Member
Jihawna Johnson, Member
Darien Key, Member
Chadwick Wyler, Member
Dear Commissioners:

On behalf of the Madeira Heights Homeowners Association Board (Netherby Place} I am writing to share our objection to the Planning Commission's proposal to rezone the property on the comer of Netherby Drive and Morello Avenue (aka Morello Terraces) to allow for the development of a 196-unit apartment building. Considerable time has been spent reviewing the updated "Housing Element" and we will look forward to the Commission Members' discussion at the meeting on May 3. This letter highlights sqme of the issues behind our objection.

The Housing Element Needs Assessment (page 4-138) states "Multiple condominiums are located around the complex on Janine Place, Fairway Place, Douglas Terrace, and Ridgeview Place, therefore making additional high..c:Jensity development an expected and confonning use and development pattern in the area. n Describing a four-story apartment building as conforming to a community of one- and two-story condominiums (non-conversions) and single-family homes nestled amongst an abundance of trees and other greenery is disingenuous at best.

The impact of adding this large housing facility to the community is not minor.

There is the potential of an additional 400 cars traveling in and out of the area on a regular basis. This is in addition to approximately 200 cars from the proposed apartment complex on Paso Noga!. This will inevitably lead to the need for upgrade and expansion of Paso Nogal, destroying the ambiance currently enjoyed by drivers, bicyclists, joggers, and walkers along that route. It seems this proposal was conducted without the benefit of a specific traffic survey or consideration for maintaining the quality and beauty of the area. H-5.1 in the Policy Document addresses preserving "High Quality Neighborhoods." Part of what makes our community 'high quality' is the natural open spaces and beautiful roadways like Paso Nagai.

Beyond aesthetics, the access to resources for residents of the apartment buildings is clearly less than ideal, contrary to the description in the Needs Assessment The closest transportation hub is a mile and a half away and the closest multi-store shopping area and grocery store is a mile away. Morello Avenue does not have sidewalks in some large sections.
) 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2150 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) -
While we have learned that the Morello Terraces proposal was a last-minute development born out of the State HCD denial of the JCPenney location, we feel strongly that that doesn't justify not taking additional steps to ensure residents of the impacted communities are aware of the idea and given ample time to better understand it and provide input. The Public Participation section of the Housing Element (Needs Assessment page 4-8) states "An inadequate public participation process may lead to community conflict or in worse case scenarios anti-development initiatives and NIMBYism." There are a number of HOAs in the area that could have been-and could still be-a key resource for contacting community members and organizing additional forums specific to this proposal as well as the Paso Nagai proposal.

As you are probably aware, this 'worse-case scenario' is in motion as residents and HOAs learned about this plan through social media and extensive word of mouth.

Recognizing the degree to which the HCO's denial complicated the Commission's timeline, ensuring the process is done with integrity is paramount to public understanding and support. To quote a communication from a Madeira Heights resident. "The selection of Morello Terraces (and Paso NogaQ seems to maximally benefit the Planning Committee's future claim of political achievements and the Corporate Builders density tax credits, while completely neglecting the impact to the surrounding areas and constituents."
Most likely you are being advised that there are no alternative locations to meet the required number of units for low-income housing options nor other ways for the City of Pleasant Hill to address the HCD demands. However, as public stewards of this process, we implore you to withdraw the Morello Terraces proposal and commit to collaboratively identifying ways to meet the State requirements that doesn't cause harm to part of your community.

Sincerely,
Q;~~u.e___
Joanne Durkee, President
Madeira Heights HOA
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2151 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r '•om:
..-ent:

Ann Miani <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 8:45 PM
(
To: Planning
Subject: Not in favor of building more housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Morello and Paso Nogal is a dangerous traffic area. People speed on Paso! I'm at Morello and Kiki.

Ann Carpenter
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2152 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Heather Mccall <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 8:16 PM
Planning
Regarding "high density" housing near Paso Nagel/Morello Ave CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern:

We are writing this letter in regards to the proposed high density housing project off Morello and Paso Nogel.

We moved to this area three years ago. We purposefully chose this location for its "country like" feel with its open spaces, rolling hills, and less dense population. When we drive home from work, it feels as if we leave the busy city life behind to come to this tranquil spot. This is particularly important in our family for our son who has autism. _ We selected this area specifically, as he needs quiet open space to feel safe. We even checked zoning around our house before we bought to ensure this was the neighborhood we were picking. This is why we and our neighbors chose to invest our money in this neighborhood.

With the addition of these proposed housing developments, it will completely shift the dynamic of this neighborhood from a quiet country feel to an overcrowded city. No longer will there be the beautiful rolling hillside. Instead it will be a huge building full of people creating noise, traffic, impacted schools, and weighing on the limited resources of this area.

There is already a huge amount of traffic at certain times of the day (heading to Hidden Lakes Park for practices, school drop off pick up and commute times) on Morello. I can't even imagine how anyone will get anywhere on these small roads with 1,000 more people living in this space. There is no public transportation nearby. Taylor Blvd is already impacted both directions and is especially congested already going towards Lafayette/bart/ SF in the mornings. Imagine what a few hundred more cars will do. There is no infrastructure to support the increase in this area. The grocery stores and shops nearby are also not equipped for this influx. Not to mention our schools- College Park is the biggest high school around with the number of kids already attending there.

Safety is also a huge concern. How will Pleasant Hill accommodate the need for more police, fire, and medical staff with this increased population? Crime, safety, and health will become increased issues. It is not recommended to build this large of a unit on Paso Nagel and Morello due to fire concerns. If a fire were to occur (and we keep a to-go bag ready at all times during fire season because it's that much of a possibility) there would be extremely limited ways in and out.

This is extremely dangerous and not zoned for a reason! Our quiet sleepy little neighborhood will suddenly be an urban jungle. W~ would NOT have committed to this area to invest our hard-earned time and finances if we had known that the very fabric of this community would change. We purposefully chose NOT to live in an area of high density. Suddenly our beautiful open space, that was not zoned for high density housing, is being threatened. What ecological impact would this have on the wild habit in the area and the environment? There is so much wildlife that would be destroyed, not to mention the pollution, and what it will take to excavate that hillside. It will be a humongous expense just to hopefully make that hillside safe. A four story building doesn't "fit" with any other structure in the vicinity, and would completely change the landscape of this community.

Finally NO other city in this area places high density housing of any income level in rural settings far from adequate transportation, medical/safety support, and basic amenities. High density housing belongs in areas with public transportation, close access to stores, increased medical and safety support, easy access to freeways, etc. There are many available spaces that this project can be built on without the huge expense of excavating a hillside for safety, with 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2153 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) many resources, and does not destroy the environment. (JCPenny, Black angus, ). Why destroy what's already beautiful? Why not take dilapidated sites and regenerate them into something wonderful that our city can be proud of? Reclaim rundown and abandoned properties and make them purposeful and beautiful. ( his seems like a poorly planned project to satisfy politics rather than taking in best interests of ALL involved. This project at the end of the day benefits no one if we congest streets, impact the few resources, create an unsafe fire danger, and destroy the beauty of our neighborhoods, and why we love Pleasant Hill. We moved here for that suburban/rural environment not urban living.
(
Heather and John McCall
31 Morello Ct
925-487-3529
Sent from my iPhone
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2154 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Felix Rodriguez <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 8:14 PM
Planning
Low income high density housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

City council members,
My name is Felix Rodriguez and have lived for the last 21 years at 1817 Morello Ave which is directly Adjacent 'from the possible building of the high density housing.

We have noticed that the traffic has gotten worse every year, I literally have to slowly creep o~t of my driveway hoping to get a break in the lines of automobiles, half of the vehicle's don't even stop at the stop sign, when I get a chance to pull out of my driveway and merge into the traffic, I'll hear harsh words coming from the driver or get the finger!
I can't count the times I've seen drivers get into an argument and come close to a fight, it's almost uncivilized.

So I ask you not to add more vehicles and traffic to drive on Morello Ave and Paso No gal.

Again, not to mention, we live on that comer.

Concerned resident, Thank you.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2155 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ~,.om:
___..ent:

To:

Subject:
hjjohnson6301 @comcast.net
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 7:56 PM
Planning
For public comment at the planning commission meeting on 5/3 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom it May Concern,
Hello. I live in the Virginia Hills neighborhood and drive Paso Nogal almost every day. My daughter goes to College Park and has her learners permit, so she is now also driving Paso Nogal every day to go to school.

I have just been made aware of Pleasant Hill's plans to create High Density, Low Income housing both on and just off Paso Nogal road, and I am emailing to express my serious concern for this plan. This area is not equipped to deal with the significant increase in infrastructure this large project would create. Traffic is already pretty busy in the morning, on that narrow, two lane road. I cannot imagine what adding approximately 800 cars to the immediate area would do. Safety, roads, sidewalks, schools, overcrowding of our local stores are all a major concern. Not to mention the reduction in our property values due to these apartments, and taking away our green space and small neighborhood vibes.

I agree we need more affordable housing in the bay area, but this is NOT THE PLACE. Low income, high density housing -·,orks best in places that are near public transportation and walkable. Again , this is not the right area for this. Please ,consider your plan.

Thanks for your time,
Heather Johnson
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2156 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael N. BATES <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 7:30 PM
Planning
Proposal for High-Density/ Low-Income Housing on Paso Nogal Rd and Morello Ave CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: the City of Pleasant Hill Planning Commission:

I am a resident and homeowner in the Pleasant Hill - Wildflower HOA community, just off Paso Nogal Road, and am writing to express my strongest possible objection to the proposal to build 300 to 400 highdensity/low-income dwelling units on both Paso Nagai Road and Morello Avenue! This message is for public correspondence at the planning commission meeting on May 3.

I fully accept the city's obligation to provide additional dwelling units, as required by state law, and completely support the need to provide more housing for low-income families! However, I do not believe the Paso Nogal and Morello sites are in any way suitable for this purpose. In particular, with up to two motor v~hides per household, they will add immensely to the traffic burden on Paso Nogal. This road is narrow anO:
winding, and the current amount of traffic makes it already quite dangerous, especially for neighboring residents pulling out into the road. There's also a very substantial amount of wildlife in the area and there have been multiple instances of collisions with deer on Paso Nogal.

There are many other sites far more suitable for high-density, low-income housing in Pleasant Hill. For example, a much better site for such housing would be in and around the Sun Valley Mall, preventing it from becoming a blighted area as the department stores, such as JCPenney, go out of business. I realize that the California Department of Housing and Community Development has raised objections to that sit~. However, I ·believe those objections are not based on a proper understanding of the site and what might otherwise become of it.

Another suitable area is the overflow parking lot at Diablo Valley College. Since Covid, many classes have gone online and the overflow lot is hardly used. There is a shortage of student housing near DVC, and the new units would greatly assist with that.

I ask that you give full attention to my concerns and those of my neighbors in this area! Thank you and sincerely,
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2157 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Michael N. Bates,
308 Primrose Dr.,
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Tel: 510-504-5424.
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2158 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Dirk Sikkema <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 7:27 PM
Planning
[email protected]
Planning Process for "low Income Housing"
Pleasant Hill.PNG
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom It May Concern:

It is my understanding that the city of Pleasant Hill Planning Commission is considering for low income housing two properties, one at the corner of Morello and Netherby Pl. and the other along Paso Nagel at Primrose. I would like to say that I am opposed to this and it is not necessarily a knee-jerk "not in my backyard" reaction.

The first consideration is traffic. Paso Nagel is a two lane winding road and Morello is four lanes going to two. It may not seem like there is a lot of traffic but recently with the pipeline project in my neighborhood (Diablo Valley Estates) the flagman would often generate lines of cars 10-15 cars deep. Traffic becomes particular bad with school dismissals and with DVC traffic. Clearly 250 units in close proximity to one another would exacerbate current conditions.

The next consideration is parking. There is currently no parking along Morello or Paso Nagel. It would be nearly impossible to expand parking along Paso Nogel and it would severely curtail the bike lane on Morello to have parking along there. We already have the townhouses at the corner of Morrelo and Chilpancingo Pkwy using our neighborhoc for overflow parking. Parking becomes an issue because the city often fails to require sufficient parking with high density developments, i.e. you may require 1.5 spaces per unit but actually because often these unit will have 3-4 driving adults the likelihood woul~ be that 3-4 spaces per unit should be required.

Next is the land itself. Both properties are on steep hillsides. The Morello property has scarring indicating that slides have occurred in the past. Substantial work would be required to make either site sufficient for construction. This work was necessary for just four single family homes on the opposite side of the street from the Marrello property. Also the steepness of the hills would make vehicle ingress and egress very difficult.

Another aspect regarding the properties is the location with regard to shopping, transportation and employment. ABAG documents, especially DRAFT REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION {RHNA) PLAN, Appendix 7 notes the importance of the relationship between low income housing and public transportation and employment. Neither of the these sites has proximity to either public transportation or employment that could be found with locations closer the Contra Costa Blvd. Also, shopping would have to be accessed most of the time by automobile.

While I realize that Pleasant Hill has state mandated housing requirements to meet, it seems grossly unfair to the residents.of north Pleasant Hill to bear the burden of meeting these requirements. This type of housing should be distributed across the city. In this regard I have attached a map with 12 potential areas.

Details to the twelve sites are provided in this link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NPOBq7isf4oFlo-YkcbUsOf0h07apw3R?usp=sharing 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2159 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) I also wonder why Pleasant Hill cannot collaborate with Martinez, Concord and Walnut Creek to more fully utilize the land resources of the Concord Navel Weapons Station. Again it seems unfair that Concord has sole control over the planning process for the Concord Navel Weapons Station when its development will have such a dramatic impact on all four communities.

I hope you will consider my concerns seriously and keep me appraised of all meetings regarding this issue.

W. Dirk Sikkema
100 St. Germain Ln.

Pleasant Hill CA 94523
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2160 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Devon Tonneson < dtonneson [email protected] >
Tuesday, May'2, 2023 7:14 PM
Planning
Resident AGAINST apt complex at Morello Terraces
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hi there,
My name is Devon Tonneson and I'm a resident on Douglas Terrace in Pleasant Hill.

I'm reaching out today to voice my strong concerns about the proposal to build an apartment complex at Morello Terrace.

This region is currently very charming and quiet. I'm afraid the addition of an apartment complex will lead to excessive traffic and a lot more noise.

Secondly, this area is populated by a variety of wildlife. Where are they expected to migrate? Has there been a study done on the environmental impact of this project? I STAUNCHLY oppose this proposal and I know the community feels the same way. This is unfair and extremely inconsiderate.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2161 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ~rom:
ent:

To:

Subject:

Kimberley Sewell < [email protected] >
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 7:09 PM
Planning
Opposition to proposal of new housing on Paso Nagai
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I live on Strayhorn Road off Paso Nogal and am opposed to the plans to build "Low Income High Density" housing to be built on Paso Nogal, and Morello at the corner of Paso Nogal.

Both these locations would increase traffic on Paso Nogal which is a curvy single-lane road with enough traffic currently, making it difficult to turn onto the street, and dangerous on the curving high point of the road close to Safeway.

The low-income housing would most certainly bring down our property values.

There are many alternative locations in the area that are available.

Kimberley Sewell
1913 Strayhorn Road
.l925) 285-3394
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2162 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

IMac <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 7:09 PM
Planning
Pleasant Hill Planning Commission Public Hearing May 3, 2023 : written comments for submission Morello Terraces and Paso Nogal site
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

May 2.2023
Troy Fujimoto, City Planner
City of Pleasant Hill
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
RE: Submission of Objections-Housing Element and Zoning Special Planning Commission Meeting
Dear Mr, Fujimoto,
We live adjacent to Paso Nogal Park approximately 1/2 mile of the proposed Morello Terraces Development.

We formally Object to the Revised.Housing Element and Upzoning of the land proposed to become the Morello Terraces.

The difficulty of obtaining information about the RHE, the Morello Terraces and adjacent Paso Nogal development stands out. This absence and loss of interaction with the community in the planning concepts of how and where to develop such a large number of housing units, points to a gross disregard of the creative ideas and planning ability of the population in our "High Resource Area".

There has been instabilty of these parcels over the years. Any undercutting of the lands to create building space after excavation will surely create engineering problems to upslope structures.

Guiding principals to development in Pleasant Hill for 40-50 years are being sacrificed. High structure limits are being set aside; required parking provisions dropped; open space in each developed parcel eliminated. All are being set aside for the RHE now; but al~o for whatever development follows.

No time seems to be taken for the opportunity of revisioning Contra Costa Blvd Corridor including the JC Penny site into a fully reconcieved "live-work" commercial and housing development.

The JC Penny site is being deselected because of proximity to Hwy 680 "air pollution". In the 8 year development period requested by the State, 1/2 of the automobile fleet is mandated to be electric. Advances in "Air Scrubbing" technology in heating/ air conditioning for resident comfort exists now.

The sites of Paso No gal and Morello Terraces have limited transportation access to community services.

Because of the lack of employment and/or shopping in the immediate areas traffic will increase exponentially. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2163 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) There is also already a problem with the uncontrolled usage of Paso No gal Park. Park and Rec does not supply park supervisors. While this is Park and Recreation Land, we are exposed to regular dog flights, threatening people walking freely about, after hours usage and substance abuse and campers. There are parking problems ( 'lnd more frequent traffic accidents.

Please consider other options such as high density live/work sites along Contra Costa Blvd corridor.

Thank you,
Wayne and Lonnie Simpson
Residents of Pleasant Hill for 34 years
2 I'

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2164 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Peggy Meyer < [email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 7:05 PM
Planning
Low Income High Density plans
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I'm concerned about the number of units proposed for the small space along Morello and Paso Nogal. As a long time homeowner in the area I feel it would be increasing the already large amount of traffic to unacceptable levels. Please consider moving the projects to another area possibly closer to services or greatly reducing the number of units.

Sent from my iPad
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2165 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
~rom:
.,ent:

To:

Subject:

Debra Klinck <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 6:55 PM
Planning
Proposed Morello/Paso Nagai building projects
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I have lived in the Paso Nagai area for 25 years. I strongly object to the Morello Terraces and Paso Nogal building proposals:
- Traffic, congestion, and pollution would drastically be increased ( traffic on Morello and Paso Nogal is already busy, Paso Noga I is a beautiful two lane country road that cannot support this kind of traffic, there are three schools in the area that use these roads already as a thoroughfare ( DVC, College Park, Valhalla). The pollution that wound be added to this beautiful natural area would affect both residents and wildlife. - Wildlife would be adversely affected with increased pollution, increased traffic, and decreased open space that they use to get around.
- This proposed project does not fit into the natural landscape of the Paso Noga I area. This area is one of the Jewels of Pleasant Hill with its open spaces, wildlife and natural beauty. It would be a travesty for Pleasant Hill to lose that! -' '1ope this is rejected!!
Sincerely, Debra Klinck
2000 Ellington Terrace, Pleasant Hill
Sent from my iPad
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2166 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Katie Quintana <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 6:43 PM
Planning
Morello apartment complex
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello,
As a resident of J anin place, I am very concerned about the possibility of a low income apartment complex being built in my neighborhood.

I lived in a neighborhood previously where low income housing was built in close proximity and the theft rate increased, houses were being broken into, and the traffic was horrific. I also have a concern for the environment and the negative effects this will have. I strongly disagree with building low.income apartments on Morello, and I'm sure I'm not alone!
· Sincerely,
Katie Quintana
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2167 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
-"om:
...... ent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:
laurent beuchotte <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 6:43 PM
Planning
Beth Beuchotte
No to Morello Terraces and Paso Nogal constructions!!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear city planner,
The plan of building almost 400 units_ in Morello Terraces and Paso Noga I is absolutely ludicrous. It will totally clog the neighborhood, schools, etc ....

Please listen to your concerned constituents and scratch the plan!! Thank you
Laurent Beuchotte
271 Macgregor Rd
pleasant hill
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2168 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Kevin Adams <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 6:41 PM
Planning; Troy Fujimoto
Kiley Leonard
Re-Zoning Objection To Morello Terrace & Paso Nogal from Homeowner Pleasant Hill Planning Commission Objection To Re-Zone 05.02.2023.docx CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Mr. Fujimoto and Pleasant Hill Planning Team,
Attached is our objection against the development of a four story, multi-building, 196-Unit apartment complex on morello terrace.

Best,
Kevin R. Adams
Kiley A. Leonard
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2169 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
--:rom:
..-ent:

To:

Roger Meyer < [email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 6:19 PM
Planning
Subject: Low income high density housing Proposal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

From: Roger Meyer <[email protected]>
Date: May 2, 2023 at 6:13:54 PM PDT
Subject: Low income high density housing Proposal
Regarding the low income high density housing being considered for Paso Nogal and Morello, the proposed size of the two projects is too big and will cause way too much congestion on Morello A venue. I have lived on Paso N ogal Court for almost 20 years and the congestion on Morello during certain parts of the day is already heavy. To add a potential 800 more cars to the mix will create very dangerous conditions for both pedestrians and other drivers. With the schools in the area, and the number of children who walk to school, the chance for a tragedy will be greatly increased. Even half of the potential 800 more cars in this area creates the potential for a real traffic nightmare.

Suggest that either the size of the two projects either be greatly reduced or one of the developments be moved to another area in town.

Sent from my iPad
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2170 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Alexander Medvedev <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 6:17 PM
Planning
Object to Low Income High Density housing project @Paso Nogal & Morello CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello,
My name is Alexander Medvedev. My family and I live @706 Tonstad Place, Pleasant Hill. We just recently found out about the plan to build a low income high density housing near our house. I strongly oppose that plan and hope it is not too late to stop the process. We moved to this house a few years ago from downtown Pleasant Hill, because we want to live in a quiet and safe neighbourhood.

I hope our voices will be heard.

Sincerely,
Alex Medvedev
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2171 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
t:rom:
. .1ent:

To:

Subject:

Andra Mandujano <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 6:07 PM
Planning
Low Income Dense Housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello,
I am a resident in the New Falcon Pointe development off of Paso Nogal between Morello & Alhambra. It's been brought to my attention that planning is being considered for high density low income housing on Paso Nagai between Morello & Alhambra and on Morello at Paso Noga I. I'm so unhappy to learn of this and definitely don't support this project. This would bring down property values, ruin the natural area we enjoy with imposing structures, create too much traffic and take away additional area from the wildlife that exists here. I'm sick even thinking about this happening. It's a no for me. Thank you for you consideration.

Alexandra Mandujano
Strayhorn Road
Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2172 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Angel Segura <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:55 PM
Plannjng
Plan for New Housing Units on Morello Ave
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I am writing to express my vehement ·opposition to the proposed housing units in our community. Frankly, I am outraged at the very thought of this project moving forward, and I implore you to reconsider this reckless and shortsighted proposal.

Our community is already congested with reckless driving, and our children's safety is constantly at risk due to the high volume of traffic. Adding more housing units will only exacerbate these problems, making it even more dangerous for our kids and making our already stressful commutes even more unbearable.

Furthermore, our schools are already bursting at the seams with students, and adding more housing units will only worsen the overcrowding and underfunding issues that plague our education system. Our children's futures are too important to be compromised by this ill-conceived project.

To add insult to injury, we pay exorbitant taxes to live in this area, and this project will only add to the burden of the hardworking taxpayers who call this community home. We deserve better than to have our safety, quality of life, and financial stability jeopardized by this ill-conceived proposal.

In conclusion, I urge you to abandon this proposed housing unit project and explore alternative solutions that will truly benefit our community without compromising our safety and well-being. If this project moves forward, we will not stand idly by, and we will use every resource at our disposal. to fight against it.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Wholeheartedly,
A Concerned Pleasant Hill Homeowner
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2173 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
~,,.om:
_,ent:

To:

Subject:
rick < [email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:52 PM
Planning
Low income housing project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I actually find it hard to believe you would consider this beautiful wildlife area for such a project! f Shame on anyone who would vote to approve it. Do the right thing and leave this area open.

Richard Clark
Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2174 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Christina Martinez <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:45 PM
Planning
Opposition to Proposed Housing on Morello Ave and Paso Nagai CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the s~nde~.

Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed housing units in our community. While I understand the need for more housing, I strongly believe that this particular project is not suitable for our neighborhood and will have a negative impact on our quality of life.

Our community is already congested with reckless driving, and many children from nearby schools are at risk of danger due to the number of vehicles on the road. Adding more housing units will increase the number of vehicles on our roads, and the safety of our children will be in even greater danger.

Moreover, our schools are already impacted with many students, and adding more housing units will lead to more students, making it even more challenging for our schools to provide the necessary resources to each student. This could lead to overcrowded classrooms, underfunded programs, and less attention given to the individual needs of each student.

Additionally, the proposed housing units will increase the traffic flow, causing more congestion and delay, making it harder for residents to commute to work and schools. This will only lead to more frustration and stress for everyone in the community.

Furthermore, it is important to note that we pay high taxes to live in this area. The· proposed housing units will only add to the burder.11 of the taxpayers and may result in increased taxes in the future. We cannot bear the additional financial strain of this project, and we urge you to consider the financial impact on the residents of our community.

In conclusion, I strongly urge you to reconsider the proposed housing units in our community. The safety of our children and the wellbeing of our community should be a top priority, and this project will only exacerbate the existing problems in our neighborhood.

Instead, I encourage you to explore alternative solutions that would benefit our community without compromising our safety, quality of life, and financial stability.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Christina M.

Resident of Pleasant Hill
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2175 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
-.,.om:
.ent:

To:

Andy Dobbs <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:34 PM
Planning
Subject: Huge objection to the proposed high density housing project CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello,
I am a homeowner on Cliffside Dr., Pleasant Hill. I wish to STRONGLY OPPOSE BOTH proposal to build high density housing on the two locations on Morello Ave. in Pleasant Hill.

I am VERY concerned about this proposal for several reasons however the main focuses are the dramatic increase in traffic and the impact the school capacity. This neighborhood has an appeal due to the lack of high density builds and this plan is going to take that away. There is already traffic congestion for working parents trying to do drop off and pick up for school.

Since Morello Ave. is the main road in and out it would create an even worse traffic nightmare. I don't think shoving 1000 people and 600 new cars into a small neighborhood is the solution to the affordable housing plan.

There HAS to be a better alternative than this proposal. This will RUIN the local community.

PLEASE, PLEASE seek other alternatives.
-Andy
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2176 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Angel Segura <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:29 PM
Planning
Housing Proposal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed low-income high-density housing development that is planned for the open space in our community. While I appreciate the need for affordable housing, I strongly believe that this particular project is not suitable for our neighborhood and will have a negative impact on our quality of life.

First and foremost, the proposed development will create a significant increase in the number of cars and traffic in our already congested area. With up to 396 units planned, the addition of hundreds of new vehicles will only exacerbate the existing traffic problems, making it more challenging for residents to commute to work and school. This will cause more frustration, delay, and stress for everyone in the community.

Moreover, the area already struggles with reckless driving and burnouts, despite the presence of many children. Adding so many new cars from the development will make this situation even more hazardous and endanger our children and families. The safety of our residents is of utmost importance, and this development will only increase the risk of accidents and. harm. It is concerning to note that nothing has been done so far to resolve the current issues with reckless driving, which only further heightens the risks associated with this development.

Additionally, our community pays high taxes to live in this area and expects a certain quality of life in return. Introducing such a large development in our already congested and crowded neighborhood will have a detrimental impact on our daily lives, decrease our property values, and ultimately have negative financial consequences for our families.

In conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the proposed low-income high-density housing development in our community. While I acknowledge the importance of affordable housing, this particular project is not the right solution for our neighborhood, and other alternatives should be explored. Please consider the welfare and,safety of our community members when making your decision and address the current issues of reckless driving before introducing additional traffic to the area.

Thank you for your.time and consideration.

Sincerely,
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2177 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( "":rom:
,ent:

To:

Subject:

Eileen Frasier <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:25 PM
Planning
Response to the proposal for housing units on Paso Nogal site CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Planning Department,
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed low-income, highdensity housing development in our immediate vicinity. I understand that the City of Pleasant Hill is under pressure from the state to provide its "fair share" of housing, but I believe that the construction of such developments in our neighborhood would have significant negative impacts on the livability of our community.

The potential increase of up to 800 automobiles and over 1,000 people in our dmall area would lead to traffic congestion, overcrowding, and a decrease in overall quality of life. I believe that the City Council should consider alternative locations for these developments that would not have such detrimental effects on our neighborhood.

I have sent this email before the May 3 deadline and also intend to attend the public hearing on May 3 at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers, in person, to voice my concerns about this proposal. I hope that the City Council will consider the views of our community when making their decision.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Eileen Frasier
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2178 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Malu Laico <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:23 PM
Planning
Re Pleasant Hill Planning Commission Public Meeting on Rezoning - Morello Terraces and Paso Nogal sloped sites - a concerned resident's objections CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Planning Commission Members:

When we purchase a home in a community it is a major decision . We evaluate the history of development, life style , congestion and property appreciation. Pleasant Hill is not a high density city. Open space is a valued commodity and should be developed wisely.

The proposed development would break that tradition and betray the trust we place in our city leadership to continue with present norms:. We do not need or want additional congestion, high rates of traffic ,more cars parked on the street, lower property values, and a diminished quality oflife that your proposal represents.

I plan to attend this meeting on Wednesday May 3, 2023 at 6:30 pm, and to voice my objection in person.

Thank you,
Lourdes Laico
1796 Douglas Terrace
Pleasant Hill, Ca.

Email: [email protected]
Cell#: 925 212-2043
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2179 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r '=rom:
... ent:

To:

Subject:

Angel <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:23 PM
Planning
Housing Proposal on Morello Ave
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear City of Pleasant Hi11,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed low-income high-density housing development that is being planned for the open space in our community. While I understand the need for affordable housing, I believe that this particular project will have a negative impact on our neighborhood and the quality of life for its residents.

Firstly, the proposed development will lead to a significant increase in the number of cars and traffic in our already congested area. With as many as 396 units planned, this development will bring in hundreds of additional vehicles on our already busy streets, exacerbating existing traffic problems and making it even more difficult for residents to get to work and school.

Moreover, the area already has issues with fast drivers and burnouts, and drivers are often careless despite the high number of children in the area. With the addition of so many cars from the new development, this situation will only get worse, creating a dangerous environment for our children and families.

Furthermore, we pay high taxes to live in this area, and we expect a certain level of quality of life in return. Adding such a development in the midst of our already congested and crowded neighborhood will only serve to decrease our property values and negatively impact our daily lives.

In conclusion, I strongly urge you to reconsider the proposed low-income high-density housing development in our community. While I understand the need for affordable housing, this particular project will do more harm than good to our neighborhood, and I believe that there are other ways to address the issue of affordable housing that will not negatively impact our community in the long run.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Angel Segura
Pleasant Hill Resident and Homeowner
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2180 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kelvin Kwan <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 4:28 PM
Planning
NO - REZONE OF MORELLO TERRACES!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Planning Committee:

I am angry, I am mad and I am disappointed as your department is considering rezoning the Morello Terraces lot.

I disagree with this proposal!
This piece ofland is not suitable for low-income families! The area is far from the freeway with no public transportation nearby. I do not think it would make any sense if the City would change zoning on the property from single-family in order to make it possible to approve zoning that would allow for-196 apartment units to be built for low-income housing purposes.

Sincerely,
Kelvin
Janin Pl resident
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2181 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( "=rom: Hope Logan <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 4:26 PM
(
.;ent:

To: Troy Fujimoto
Subject: Objection to 4 story apt. building placed at Paso Nogal Road in P.H.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: Pleasant Hill Planning Committee:

THIS IS MY OBJECTION to the proposal to rezone the Morello Terrace ( open nature space at comer of Morello and Netherby hillside to accommodate a four story apartment complex to contain 196 dwelling units (apartments); and proposal including plans for the identical rezoning to a vacant site on Paso Nogal.

The Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan provides no rationale for the selection of the Morello Terraces over other available lots nor are there any insight to the "Planning Teams" consideration of alternative lots/strategies, any analysis of impact to the surrounding environment, or adherence to surrounding community input. The Planning Commission's complete neglect of input from the surrounding communities - as well as the non-existent consideration of alternative
strategies or analysis of impact - forces me to objected loudly! I object for the following reasons:

Jrastic increase in traffic flux: It is reasonable to assume most tenants would have an additional car, that the complex would not accommodate, resulting in drastic overspill of vehicle parking into neighboring streets such as Douglas Terrace, St Germain Place, Netherby Street, Netherby Place, Janin Place, Fairway Place, Morello Avenue, Ridgeview Drive, Ridgeview Place. This lot is not a transit rich area per Senate Bill 1 O; therefore it is reasonable to assume cars would be the residents primary form of transportation. Additionally, Morello A venue is already filled with major morning and afternoon traffic from non-resident communities driving to Diablo Valley College, College Park High School, Valley View Middle School and Valhalla Elementary School.

The excavation of this hillside will also transform a mild/moderate natural gradient slope to a vertical gradient to accommodate a four-story, multi building complex, which would require thousands of gallons of diesel fuel needed to grade the slopes.

This destruction of open-space land is seemingly at odds with the guidance set forth in Government Code 65400; " ... practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plan, so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources ... " ~were disruption of the surrounding housing privacy/uniformity: The proposed four-story apartment complex would be completely singular in its density, architecture, and land usage compared to the surrounding area. The 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2182 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) resulting increase in population density would negate the intended surrounding building edges, transition, context, and privacy.

I moved to this area for the serenity and open space by the part area and throughout. To remove myself from Walnut Creek's outrageous traffic down Y gnacio Valley Road and Treat Blvd. Morello A venue will become _ more like those 'highways', as well as, Alhambra.

The selection of Morello Terraces (and Paso No gal) maximally benefits the "Planning Committee's" future claim of political achievements and the Corporate Builders density tax credits, while completely neglecting the impact to the surrounding area and constituents. When the decision points to benefiting the "Planning Committee" and builders without any engagement of the surrounding community, I strongly object!
Sincerely,,
Hope Logan
449 Ridgeview Drive
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2183 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r crom:
,ent:

To:

Subject:

CHARLES DOYLE <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 4:26 PM
Planning; Debra Doyle
196 units at Morello Terrace
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

We'are adamantly opposed to rezoning Morello Terraces for low income, high density housing.

There are other flat lots in Pleasant Hill that have poorly utilized commercial buildings that would be better candidates. The amount of earth moving and disruption to our local habitat will be severe. You've allowed many more suitable lots to be converted to single family homes that would have been ideal for high density.

Please reconsider and leave Morello Terrace alone.

Sincerely,
Charles and Debra Doyle
353 Skander Lane
Pleasant Hill CA
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2184 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

MaryAnn DiNatale <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 4:20 PM
Planning
Rezoning of Morello Terrace and Paso Nogal Site
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Mr. Fujimoto,
We are writing in regards to the change to the General plan regarding the above subject matter. We reside in the property adjacent to where the Morello Terrace site is being proposed. When we moved here almost 30 years ago-after living in San Francisco, what attracted us to this area was the semirural nature of the area. In the years we have lived here more of the ruralness is leaving the ~rea and it seems the City needs to put houses in every bit of land that exists.

We formally object based on several issue misrepresentations in the planning documents.

First of all, very disappointed in the City's lack of notice in reference to the above issue. The only time we had any idea of this was through a post on Next Door. we would have expected something in the mail or signs regarding this matter of an upcoming meeting. We received something in the mail regarding the meeting on redistricting. It was almost like the Planning Commission was trying to approve this project quickly so as not to allow any input from the surrounding communities or impact to the surrounding communities.

Your statement in regards to Morello Terrace "The site has been identified as suitable for upzoning due to its close proximity to multifamily residential uses on three sides, its location in a high resource area, and its large size. Multiple condominiums are located around the complex on Janin Place, Fairway Place, Douglas Terrace, and Ridgeview Place, therefore making additional high-density development an expected and conforming use and development pattern in the area. Additionally, _its large size allows for well planned, cohesive developments that are able to maximize density and incorporate cohesive planning that can include mixed-use components and the addition of services. " is a complete misrepresentation. The condominiums located near that property cover roughly plus 20 acres of land and there are less than the 140 units in this area now. You are trying to cram 196 units into 6.55 acres and another 102 in a 3.4 acre site.

This does not even address the traffic congestion, excess noise etc. There is already too much traffic on Morello . We have parents dropping their children off at school, students going to DVC and others going to their jobs. Also the closest market is a mile away on a very' narrow road that in some parts cannot possibly be widened and there is no public transportation available.

We understand the HCD rejected the JC Penney site due to the pollution and closeness to the freeway. I am sure the State is aware of the initiatives for electric vehicles and natural gas for trucks. Pollution will become a non-issue. This site is close to transportation, schools and shopping.

Look at the developments near the Pleasant Hill and Walnut Creek Bart Stations. Both of those are close to Bart and 680 but no one was concerned about pollution when those were built? 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2185 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Can't the planning commission push back and reintroduce the JC Penney site again? Also why weren't the sites at the Library(Davidon homes), the two on Taylor Blvd(at Morello and Lucille Lane) and the Pondersa Homes looked at as possible sites before those developments were built. What ( .,bout where Black Angus Restaurant was or the empty lot across from DVC? There is a lot of empty .,ommercial property around as well and there will be more once Bed, Bath and Beyond closes.

Lastly as I stated earlier on in my letter, we found this area attractive because of the open spaces and natural resources. We have wild turkeys, deer, coyotes, raccoons, etc wandering around and through these vacant lots. We understand the City is under pressure from the HCD and we are not opposed to low cost housing in this area. We are only asking that it comply with what is currently here-i.e. 20- 30 Townhome units or condominiums not over 300 including the Paso Nogal site, or leave the zoning as it has been for over 50 years.

Sincerely,
MaryAnn DiNatale & Robert Duncan
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2186 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jahn Meintz <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 4:18 PM
Troy Fujimoto
Letter Of Objection for The Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the o·rganization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To the Pleasant Hill Planning Commission,
I hereby object to the building of the the 4-Story, 196 unit Apartment complex on Morello Terrace that is the The Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan Morello Multi-Building Apartment Complex.

My biggest concern is the impact that it will have on the wildlife in the area that rely so heavily on our urban forests for food and shelter. It's already difficult for deers and their fawns to navigate their native lands without getting hit by a car.

This project will completely degrade the health of their habitat! There will be a complete disruption of privacy and housing uniformity and again will have a severe traffic impact especially when DVC in session all impacting our wildlife and quality of life for residents in the area.

Sincerely,
Mathew Meintz,
Resident of Ridgeview Townhomes
Sent from my iPhone (925) 356-1296
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2187 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( .-;,om:
""ent:

To:

Subject:

K.C. HOGAN < [email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 3:32 PM
Planning
Paso Nogal and Morello Proposed Section 8 New Construction CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless ou recognize the sender.

Why are you proposing to build a section 8 high density housing project near a low density secluded residential area? Have you even considered the properties have extreme slopes that will require significant land excavation and retaining walls? This will easily double your construction budgetr Why isn't section 8 housing being located in high traffic, noisy, and cheaper development real-estate areas such as near the freeway that is closer to public transportation? Apparently, the city has the money or is getting it from the $22B Newsom State housing fund, so why not purchase some of the excess parking lot from Sears? Crime is already a problem around there, so why not make it easier for the cops and consolidate it in one area? Newsom's laws obviously circumvent a lot of prior red tape so that you could purchase such land. Or what about behind Target or near CarMax?
I'd like to ask if any council members live near your proposed areas. I think a 1 mile radius should suffice, and if you are not within this zone, then you should abstain from voting on this proposal. Have any one of you considered the uptick in crime that will occur around section 8 housing? What about the significant impact to our local schools that are already heavily impacted? Adding 400 plus new students sounds like a Great plan.

These lots are adjacent to Paso Noga I Park. Have any of you contemplated that crime, trash, and vagrants will overtake 1is small local park.

Nobody wants section 8 housing in their backyard. I feel I speak for a lot of residences: we worked hard, saved, and decided on this community as a safe place for our children and their future. We hope any future residents will have similar values. I'm sorry to say this, but low income should not get preferential treatment. They need something to strive for versus being handed a gift. If they want a gift, then it should occur in an area less desirable than ours.

Concerned New Resident on Kiki Dr.

Sent from Mail for Windows
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2188 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) · Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Aaron Chin <[email protected]>
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 3:31 PM
Planning
Low Income, High Density Housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern:

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed low-income, high density housing development plan at Wildflower Dr and Paso Nogal Rd and at the comer of Morello and Paso Nogal. I live at 503 Daisy Place and we moved to this area from Houston, TX about 1.5 years ago. It is beautiful and there are many reasons why we want to stay, including the open natural space around our house full of many trails, parks, and access to nature. However, I believe that these developments would be a negative addition to our neighborhood and would have a profound negative impact on our community.

First, I am concerned about the impact that this development would have on traffic and noise pollution. Our neighborhood is quiet - a hard find in our crowded cities. However, it is already congested, and I am concerned that this development would only make the problem worse.

Second, I am concerned about the impact that this development would have ,on property values. The plap. will undermine the rights and interests of the homeowners who have invested their time, money, and effort to maintain and improve their properties. The homeowners have a legitimate expectation to enjoy the benefits of their investment and to preserve the integrity and stability of their neighborhood. The low-income, high-density housing plan will violate this expectation and impose an unfair burden on the homeowners of this area.

Third, I am concerned about the impact that this development would have on the character of our neighborhood.

Our neighborhood is a quiet, family-friendly neighborhood with a strong sense of community. I am concerned that the affordable housing development would attract a different type of resident and would change the character of our neighborhood with a potential for increasing crime in our area.

For all of these reasons, I urge you to take these areas out of consideration of the low-income, high-density housing plan. I do sympathize with the housing crisis needs of our state and our cities. With that said, the city of Pleasant Hill may want to look at repurposing underutilized commercial areas for the housing plan, as these already have the infrastructure to establish a livable area.

Thank you for your time and consideration. If you or your office would like to contact me, I have my contact information at the bottom of this email.

Sincerely,
Aaron Chin
Cell: 925-984-1931
Email: [email protected]
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2189 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( .-:rom:
... ent:

To:

Kris Nuyten < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:19 PM
Planning
Subject: Fwd: Paso Nogal/Morello Low Income Housing -- Opposed CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Kris Nuyten <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:11 PM
Subject: Paso Nogal/Morello Low Income Housing -- Opposed - For Public Comment at the May 3 Meeting To: <[email protected]:;>
I am strongly opposed to the level of density and location choices for these low income housing - maybe ONE with less density --- but not two within a half mile of each other!!! There has to be better or more economical choices --
1) This level of housing could add 1,000 more vehicles to this already high traffic area because of the 4 schools ·7 the area.
-J The land choices will be riddled with challenges to overcome the sink hole and mudslide prone hills. 3) There has to be better choices - look harder and fight harder to get other areas approved (JC Penney Home Store -- maybe forgo the park and sports fields planned for the open lot near the PH library -- which is an ideal spot!!
Stop approving single family subdivisions -- you've let some really good low income housing building sites slip through your hands -
A) Old PH Library site
B) Old church site - Taylor/Norse
C) Molino Pasta site
And you let a perfect site - the old KMart area slip through your hands -- that would have been ideal for high density housing!
Concerned Pleasant Hill Citizen -
Kristine Nuyten
557 Mesa Verde Place
Pleasant Hill
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2190 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Antiques and Things <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:13 PM
Planning
Proposed Low Income Units Paso Nogal - Morello
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I am responding to the proposed building of low income housing on Paso Nogal and Morello Avenue in Pleasant Hill. I have lived in this area for over 30 years and have been able to see first hand the changes to this quiet small neighborhood. When I relocated here there was no dog park adjacent to Paso Nogal. Children used that area to play soccer and the high school used the park to run track related sports. The dog park services the community but many dog owners come to our park that do not live in Pleasant Hill but surrounding communities. That meant an increase in daily traffic and congestion for nearby home owners and renters. Parking is so limited that park goers use the unpaved rough side of the road to reach the park. Consider what would happen if, just down the road ,there were 200 to 300 additional units that would now use the small two lane road. Within the last few weeks trees were removed and the trucks and workers removing the debris caused many delays for homeowners. Consider what would happen if there was construction in that area, traffic would be horrific, homeowners would not be able to access their homes. They would be forced to take detours that would mean extra travel time just to go to the Safeway shopping center. There is a reason there is no public transportation and few trucks on Paso Nogal. The current two lane road is not wide enough to accommodate large vehicles. UPS and Fed.Ex trucks travel at unsafe speeds up and down Paso Nogal.

Several years ago the City of Pleasant Hill had a proposal for a Disc Golf Course, it was defeated. Placing it within Paso Nogal Park would have destroyed the environment, caused increased traffic and noise. The same issues would apply to the current proposal. This area is home to foxes, turkeys, deer not to mention Coyotes that freely roam the area. Our neighbors have been accustomed-to watching out for wildlife.

Adding an additional 200-300 units adjacent to this quiet road does not make sense. Increased and unmanageable traffic. No public transportation the closest hub is DVC. There is a reason that the City does not have bus routes in this area.

The plan for homes at Morello on a property, called Morello Terrace, is unsuitable for the same reasons. People walking up the hill from Morello and Paso Nogal toward Martinez are constantly in danger from speeding cars. Bicycle riders also share the danger of speeding cars. I have been at the intersection of Paso Nogal and Morello multiple times when drivers don't even heed the four way stop signs. Additional homes, regardless of size, in this area would mean additional danger to humans and animals that frequent the wooded area.

There must be a more suitable location to provide housing, perhaps nearer Contra Costa Blvd. I have heard that several other locations were suggested. Across from DVC - The prior JC Penney location or unused areas near Sun Valley Mall. I am against building where is doesn't make sense. All proposed locations need to be in alignment with the needs of the intended population. Easy to access shopping, food, public transportation, hospitals, health care, schools and other needed services. The two proposed locations do not meet those needs. Sincerely, GK Barton
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2191 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( '\"Om:
.-ent:

To:

Kris Nuyten <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:12 PM
Planning
Subject: Paso Nogal/Morello Low Income Housing -- Opposed CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I am strongly opposed to the level of density and location choices for these low income housing - maybe ONE with less density --- but not two within a half mile of each other! ! ! There has to be better or more economical choices --
1) This level of housing could add 1,000 more vehicles to this already high traffic area because of the 4 schools in the area.
2) The land choices will be riddled with challenges to overcome the sink hole and mudslide prone hills. 3) There has to be better choices - look harder and fight harder to get other areas approved (JC Penney Home Store -- maybe forgo the park and sports fields planned for the open lot near the PH library -- which is an ideal spot!!
Stop approving single family subdivisions -- you've let some really good low income housing building sites slip through your hands -
) Old PH Library site
.d) Old church site - Taylor/Norse
C) Molino Pasta site
And you let a perfect site - the old KMart area slip through your hands -- that would have been ideal for high density housing!
Concerned Pleasant Hill Citizen -
Kristine Nuyten
557 Mesa Verde Place
Pleasant Hill
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2192 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sharen F <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:09 PM
Planning
We were not given any notice about this!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: Pleasant Hill Planning
I live on Mesa Verde Place in Pleasant Hill.

A neighbor texted me a photo of this flyer (below) just moments ago. Someone she knows from a nearby neighborhood showed the notice to her.

I am very surprised & disappointed that the city of Pleasant Hill did not notify all the neighborhoods that would be affected by these proposals so we could give our feedback.

We moved to Pleasant Hill, in large part, because of the supportive, caring reputation the city has earned through the years, which is why I'm so disappointed that we didn't receive any notice about these proposals.

Pleasant Hill is aptly named, but these high density housing developments would alter this reality for all the surrounding neighborhoods.

Traffic on Paso Nogal is already noisy & dangerous at times because of sideshow-like activity at the comer of Morello & Paso Nogal, and in the parking lot at DVC that we hear almost every single weekend. Those participating in such dangerous behavior must drive to and from these locations, and have proven that they have very poor judgment, & no regard for public safety whatsoever. Adding high density housing developments in these areas would put more people in harm's way. I have heard cars speeding up & down Paso Nogal in the past when I was expecting family & friends to visit from out of town, & I've been scared that they would be hit by one or more of these reckless drivers. I've also seen police chases on Paso Nogal & Golf Club Rd racing to & from the DVC parking lot in response to this behavior, I assume (for which, frankly, I'm grateful be I'm concerned about the cars spinning & screeching in that area, which is bordered by apartment buildings on both sides of Golf Club Rd). On many occasions, I've been frightened my loved ones might be hit by someone speeding on Paso Nogal, Morello, &/or Golf Club Road.

Additionally, some people speed along Paso Nogal &/or Morello on their way to and from work, etc. Adding so many residents to this area would only make matters worse.

I hope the city of Pleasant Hill, which has earned a well-deserved reputation for providing excellent city services to this community, will reconsider such plans and find a more suitable, safer location for the proposed developments.

Sharen Fretwell
PS
I was just informed by another neighbor that such proposals were entertained for the former Kmart building anr perhaps one other place in this area. We were never informed of any of these proposals, so we very upset. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2193 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
·om:
... ent:

To:

Subject:

Thais Yafet <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:00 PM
Planning
Objection to 196-unit Morello Terrances
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern:

We are submitting a letter of objection to the proposed rezoning of Morello Terr for a 196 unit 4 story apt building.

We reside on Janin Place and already face parking issues and awkward traffic conditions due to narrow one way street that dead ends.

All of the streets off Netherby are narrow and dead end roads.

This concerns me great! y, because where are these 400 cars supposed to go and park? Not even mentioning the guest parking accommodations. With 66% of the units be "low income " and "lower income", means that these tenants all require cars to get to and from work, schools and the local stores. Also this proposed site has no access to public transportation which does not serve lower income members of our community well. 196 units is more than total amount of units on Netherby, Fairway, Douglas Terr and Janin combined. More than double all of our combined units. That is a serious traffic amd noise concern.

We object to loosing more open green space that serves a vital purpose to our areas wildlife habitats and the existing population.

We will all loose light with a 4 story build; again it is too high, too wide and too big. Does not fit the area asthetic, and the area is originally zoned R20 which is single family use 20,000sq ft. This proposal is way way out of scope.

This process doesn't appear to be equitable by any measurement. Did this proposal go through the Diversity Commission( er)? Did the wellbeing of accessible needs of the tenants get considered. Did the wellbeing of the surrounding homeowners even come up for discussion?
This proposed location is honestly non-senense, not because we do not believe for accessible quality housing for all, no matter your income status.

We strongly object, because this is simply a bad idea all the way around.

Again, where are these 400 cars going to park?
· ,ank you for listening.

Thais & Bill Schrambling
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2194 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) 59 Janin Place
Pleasant Hill, CA
94523
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2195 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
·,.om:
..,ent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Matthew Kennedy <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:00 PM
Planning; Troy Fujimoto
Letter of Objection to Rezoning Morello Terraces
M. Kennedy - Objection Letter for Rezoning of Morello Terraces.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I have included niy letter of objection both within the email and as a PDF attachment:

May 2, 2023
Troy Fujimoto
City Planner
City of Pleasant Hill
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
RE: Submission of Objections - Housing Element and Zoning - Special Planning Commission Meeting Dear Mr. Fujimoto,
iY name is Matthew Kennedy and I have lived in the Madeira Heights neighborhood my entire life. I am writing to you to submit my formal objections under Government Code §65000, et. seq. as to the proposed adoption of the Revised Housing Element and zoning issues set for hearing at the special Planning Commission meeting on May 3, 2023.

Although I am not in the conference rooms or zoom calls with your team, I can understand how there is tremendous pressure coming from the state to satisfy the HCD with their allocation and therefore have Pleasant Hill documented as "doing their part" for the housing crisis. The existence of this development pressure and its intended idealistic purpose are not what I am objecting to; I think it is a noble cause and we as a community appreciate how hard you all are working to balance this complex issue.

What I am objecting to is the manner by which the planning commission and the city council have wholly neglected initiating any type of communication with the surrounding communities that would be affected by the proposed decision to rezone the Morello Terraces Lot from Single Family to Multifamily High Density. Furthermore I must object with the strongest possible conviction the underhanded attempt to force an SB-10 qualifying condition on the Morello Terraces lot to feign conformance to gain HCD approval. By definition, the Morello Terraces Lot does not exist within a "Transit-Rich Area" and the proposed 5 story, 40 du/ac residential apartment structure absolutely does not conform to the surrounding development pattern of Low Density Multi-Family condos and single family neighborhoods nestled amongst the natural setting. Any interpretation otherwise has to be viewed for what it is, an attempt to change the very definition of binding words to falsely claim ·conformance within the Revised Housing Draft.

I understand having personal ambition to accelerate projects, whether that is the planning commission, City ouncil, or the HCD; however even heavy-handed ambition is absolutely bound by the governing legislation from whence it came. Morello Terraces does NOT meet the SB-10 qualifying conditions and I implore you as leaders to have the humility and integrity to acknowledge and accept this. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2196 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) In order to further explain my reasoning, please see below for the summary of factors informing my objection:

1. 2.

3. Complete Neglect of Community Involvement & Transparency:

4. 2.

3. Our neighborhood first became aware of this issue with less than one week to prepare for the 5/3/2023 meeting to provide our input about this proposed massive project. Regardless of what the commission and city council claim was done to provide adequate notice to residents, this is an absolute failure to properly notify and engage the residents who will actually be impacted by this decision. A project of this magnitude should have been communicated with the highest priority to our surrounding HOA organizations; instead references to the Morello Terraces and Paso Nagai proposed sites are buried in hundreds of pages of attachments to the meeting agenda. All it would have taken was just one email sent to each HOA to provide notification, yet this was purposefully avoided. If your neighborhood was suddenly on the gauntlet to be abruptly transformed from a semi-rural neighborhood to a congested urban structure, I would think you would want to be notified if there was a proposal to completely raze it for a congested high density structure. Please have some empathy as to how this is the absolute worst-case-scenario for our community and violates all of the City's claimed notification and engagement of surrounding community protocols. Based upon the City's previous record of engagement with us, we can draw no other conclusion than this was a blatant attempt by the City Council and staff to approve this project under the radar, showing a massive bias towards their own perceived achievements and the HCD's heavy-handed ambition.

4. Complete Neglect of Alternative Strategy Formulation:

5. The city has provided no existence of consideration of alternative strategies to utilizing the Morello Terraces Lot. I would think if the Planning Commission, City Council, and HCD at large truly cared about providing the maximum benefit to a planned low-income residence, they would want to choose the location such that it maximizes the following:
•
•
• Access to transportation, AKA being close to a "transit-rich area" •
•
•
• Conforming to the d~finition of an Urban Infill Site, AKA conforming the existing development • patterns .
•
•
•
• Provide opportunity and engagement by building in a High-Resource Area . •
Considering these factors, it seems that the city is blatantly avoiding developing the following lot for low-income residents, the "Beatrice/Cleveland Parcels". Building a high-density multi family apartment at this location would be located in the heart of downtown pleasant hill, allowing for easy access to bus lines, restaurants, shops, and completely conforming the existing development pattern due to the current accepted four story 2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2197 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) apartment complex being built at 85 Cleveland Road. The city has currently designated the Beatrice/Cleveland parcels for Above Moderate income, which seems at odds with the HCD's request when this site would perfectly conform to the SB-10 qualifying criteria and allow for low-income residents to be housed in a "High- ..qesource" area. By defaulting to providing this optimum location to the ."Above Moderate" income level, the Aty is seeking maximum return for the builder while violating HCD's communicated motive. If the City were to use the Beatrice/Cleveland parcels for low-income, they could then transfer the previously planned dwellings at Beatrice/Cleveland Parcels to one of the Housing Opportunity Sites. This would be optimum for our lowincome residents as the Beatrice/Cleaveland site actually meets the SB-10 criteria unlike Morello Terraces. llfflrice/ 149-130-020, 5.13 Planned Unit Multi-Family 149 149Above Sites do not need ta lnaFEMA Cleaveland 024,021, (by Dislflct Medium Density t?~~4:1 •
Moderate undergo lol designated 1 OD-year
Parcels 022,023, percel: consaffdalian far
Interior parcel 029,030 2.47, 45) development ~t,'!;;:!s Cleaveland Rd 0.38, and may tequfre
weslof270 0.36, setbacks according
Cleaveland; 576. 0.37, toPHMC 590, 564, 570 0.36, Beatrice Road; 1.19, Northeast ~ 2.19)
Cleavelend Rd I Beatrice Rd west
af 240 Cleaveland Rd

3. 4.

5. False Statements and Bias in Draft Revised Housing Element:

6. The draft "Housing Element" prepared by the city makes false statements about the proposed parcels. The claim that Morello Terraces is "Multiple condominiums are located around the complex on Janin Place, Fairway Place, Douglas Terrace, and Ridgeview Place, therefore making additional highdensity development an expected and conforming use and development pattern in the area." This is an unequivocally FALSE statement. A pattern has a rule that informs us as to which objects belong to the pattern and which objects do not belong to the pattern. Th; in short it allows for predictability to exist from the obseNation point of a rational actor . The attempt to claim a five story structure is a predictable conformance to the surrounding pattern of development must be deemed false by a reasonable/rational judgment. The surrounding condominiums are Low-Density Multi-Family consisting of detached one and two story duplexes. Referring back to the aforementioned quote, the reference of "additional highdensity development" is a blatant lie; there are no surrounding high density developments. This false justification is used to support the notion that the Morello Terraces Lot should then be the site of one of if not the tallest residential structure in our city.

Now to focus on bias of terminology; the City first defines the Morello Terraces lot as "'High Resour~e" which I am not arguing with the methodology of this label application. But they then proceed to refer to this lot as being a "Very High" resource to communicate the largest possible perceived difference in resource so that this will be optimum for the HCD's acceptance criteria. This is blatant bias and falsification to claim a resource designation of "Very High Resource" which contradicts the previous accepted definition of "High Resource". It seems as though the City has free reign to change the very definition of our language to attempt and cram Morello Terraces into an SB-10 designation, but again, this lot is NOT within a transit rich-area and cannot be considered an urban infill site and therefore cannot be deemed within the bounds of SB-10 by any rational/reasonable person.

In conclusion, I understand you are under tremendous pressure, and that the path of least resistance is tempting. However I implore you to be real leaders and demonstrate your fortitude, integrity, and humility by accepting that no matter how much force or by what angle you apply it, Morello Terraces does NOT meet the SB-10 criteria and should not even be considered for rezoning. We want to work with you, to help you satisfy your stakeholders, but to do that you need to engage us. Based upon previous behavior, the only true pattern we can derive is that you are not considering the community at all, and you are bowing to the big-tech/real1tate funded YIMBY movement which is attempting to bludgeon the very laws and regulations that allowed it .J exist in the first place.

Sincerely,
3 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2198 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Matthew Kennedy
Lifetime Madeira Heights Resident
4 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2199 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
"=rom:
..,ent:

To:

Subject:

Jen Cogen <[email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :56 AM
Troy Fujimoto
PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2023 Projects off Morello and Paso Nogal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear City of Pleasant Hill Planning Department:

RE: Morello and Paso Nogal development sites.

The two things people seem to hate most about the Bay Area are the high cost of living and traffic. As you are aware, we have both problems in Pleasant Hill, and one shouldn't be ignored at the expense of the other.

It makes little sense to build high density housing in a car dependent neighborhood, almost 5 miles to a BART station, and not connected to any bike routes.

Yes, the need for new build sites is great, and I urge you to find a more suitable location ... -near transit, and blocks from services such as grocery stores. -where the roads are wider"and it's easier to evacuate a neighborhood, in the event of emergencies Jch as fires.
-on flat land which is more cost effective to build on.

If the project is within half a mile of a major transit stop, a jurisdiction may not ap.ply any density limit to the project, per Pleasant Hill's "Housing Needs Assessment." Dependency on cars is expensive for residents, bad for the environment, and lowers the quality of life for all of us who spend even more time in traffic.
"Affordable housing near transit not only supports low-income households but also increases the return on investment for local governments and transit operators, who spend millions on transit infrastructure."*
Please continue your search for better building sites so you can meet your housing goal with the whole community's well being in mind.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Cogen
Pleasant Hill, California
Jource: "Housing Affordability in Transit-Oriented Developments," 17 May 2022, US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2200 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kevin Van Buskirk <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :52 AM
Planning
Morello Terrace
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Pleasant Hill Planning Commission,
My name is Kevin Van Buskirk, born and raised in Pleasant Hill and currently own my home at 236 Netherby Place, Pleasant Hill, CA.

Please accept this email as my objection to the proposal to rezone the Morello Terrace parcell at the corner of Morello and Netherby to accommodate a four story 196 unit apartment complex of which will only benefit the State of CA's requirement of affordable housing units within a city general plan.

I have seen no rationale for the selection of this site ~ver other available sites. As well, there seems to be no insight as to the planning commission's analysis of the impacts to the surrounding communities.

A project like this will cause a drastic increase to the traffic.which will be a detriment to all your constituents, wildlife etc ... as it is safe to say there will be at least two cars per unit. Possibly more than one family in some units which will tax our already taxed infrastructure like sewer, electric etc.. Also, will not fit with the existinr community of SFH, and Condos.

Only the developers will be benefiting on a horrible project like this one. The community will absolutely lose on this crazy idea.

Keep this comer the way it has been, An Open Nature Space and remove it from any consideration of future development.

Thank you.

Kevin Van Buskirk
510-715-3744
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2201 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
"":rom:
"'ent:

Paul Primary Bittner < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :52 AM
To: Planning
Subject:

Attachments:

Planning meeting tonight, May 3rd at 6:30 pm statement also attached as WORD file PH Meeting 05-03-2023.doc
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Both my wife and I are very concerned with the impact of traffic on Morello Avenue. Currently, unless absolutely necessary, we do not go anywhere between 7 and 1 O am because it is so dangerous to cross Morello Road. Even coming home after 4 pm may be a challenge-crossing Morello Road. A few years ago our then neighbor, Michael Chaisr, auto was struck and totaled by a careless driver on Morello Road "running" the stop sign. Michael's auto was so badly damage that if Michael had proceeded a few seconds sooner he would have been severally injured or killed.

I would also like to know who owns or are the owners of the properties. I always assumed or was under the impression that these properties were and would all ways be "Open Space". It always made a trip along these routes more enjoyable.

I have many other concerns. Just name a few.

1. Huge increase in traffic and added time to a drive anywhere.

2. What will it do to all our property values?

3. Increased population density.

4. Design of housing. Will it iconform to the existing housing?

5. Single housing, Duplex, Apartments, High-rise?

6. Parking in such a small area (Visit Foothill Place)

7. Rain water run off. Required bio-field area?

8. Will this conform with the Pleasant Hill City Wide Design Guidelines and Objective Design Standards 2017 Residential Guidelines I 2021 Residential Objective Design Standards Residential Objective Design Standards Adopted by City of Pleasant Hill City Council Resolution No. 18-22

9. If this housing is approved and built will a traffic light be installed at the intersection of Paso Nagai Road Morello and Paso Nagai Court for the safety of drivers wishing to cross Morello Road?
I wish to speak at the meeting.

Sincerely.

Paul J. Bittner
57 Paso Nogal Ct.

Pleasant Hill, CA
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2202 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subjed:

Attachments:

Ed Manguiat <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11:35 AM
Troy Fujimoto
Objection Letter for the Morello Terrace & Paso Nogal Re-zoning Manguiat objection to Pleasant Hill Planning Commission 05032023.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Thanks you for taking in my Objection Letter. It is below in the body of the email and also attached.

Edwin Manguiat, 116 Southwind Drive, Pleasant Hill.

May 3,2023
To: Pleasant Hill Planning Committee:

I would like to express my concerns and objection to the proposal for the Morello Terrace ( open nature preserve at the comer of Morello and Netherby.) I believe also there are plans for rezoning a vacant site on Paso Nogal.

The focus of my objections will not be on the following (which I agree are major issues and are contributing factors to my objection to the rezoning also):

Drastic increase in traffic flux
Complete degradation of the environment/wildlife habitat Severe disruption of the surrounding housing privacy/uniformity Taxing on current Police, Fire, and other 1st responder services.

Noise and light pollution (which is a factor on the wildlife and natural beauty Disregard for the· emb~dded base of homes
As I also agree with the above issue and blight which will be created but I my focus is on some on the books 'new' California standards as I see is infrastructure impacting.

The Electrical Grid in this area.

This area has been subject to the loss of electrical power due to the fragile electrical grid. But what I see are a couple of on the books California and localized actions in place impacting a rezoning/redevelopment of the areas in question. I) New structures are to have electric appliances and heating and 2) by 2035 California will 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2203 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) sell only EV vehicles. First, no gas into this apartment locations of over 200 units. It is hard enough for the grid now. PG&E may say we will put in a new substation/upgrade but they have fines and rebuilds they need to finance after the major fires they caused. Will they there possibly build a new substation? Will there truly be

11.ough power available for the new apartments? Along these lines of fires, we are in a sensitive fire area. So will these apartments have a fire break/fire road in an already congested area? Next is that I believe that each unit will have one parking stall. Stall not garage. So will each of these stalls be configured for the EV charging station needed for the EV vehicles? Oh 2035 is in the future, we are at 2023 and say it takes even 3 years to build that is less than 10 years for the law to be in place. Can't upgrade stalls 13 years hence, it should be planned now. Not just here in these two planned location but throughout Pleasant Hill. As EV grows what is the city plan? Where is that plan? So more pull on the electric grid. A fragile electric grid as it is.

This is tough to ask but, if there is a desire to re-zone, then there must be someone or some entity wanting to build already. How many current city officials are planning to work, contract or be a sub to these builders? When they say 'Build it and they will come", I hope is not officials planning their next place to move to at the expense of the people of Pleasant Hill.

Thanks for hearing my objections to this re-zoning.

Sincerely,
Edwin & Donna Manguiat
.._16 Southwind Drive
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
[email protected]
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2204 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Yan Yan Ng <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :32 AM
Planning
Public comment at the planning commission meeting - OBJECTIONS TO REZONE OF

MORELLO TERRACES
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Planning Committee:

I am strongly DISAGREE with your proposal in considering rezoning the Morello Terraces lot from single families to multibuildings for low-income housings.

This piece of land is not suitable for low-income families! There will be big impacts to the surrounding environment and adherence to surrounding communities inputs. These areas are far from the freeway with no public transportation nearby, as well as lack of parking spaces. I do not think it would make any sense if the City would change zoning on the property from single-family in order to make it possible to approve zoning that would allow for 196 apartment units to be built for low-income housing purposes.

I here strongly express my objections against your proposal.

Sincerely,
Shirley Kwan
Janin Pl resident
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2205 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
·rom:
.;ent:

To:

Subject:
christine culshaw <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :29 AM
Troy Fujimoto
Morello Terrace and Paso Nogal Objection of High Density Apartment Complex - Rezoning
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Mr. Fujimoto,
We are writing to inform the planning committee of the city of Pleasant Hill of our objection to the building of high density apartment complexes at both the Morello Terrace and Paso Nogal locations. As far as we are aware, both locations are zoned for single family homes not huge apartment high density complexes of hundreds of units. There has been a total lack of transparency and notice from the city to the neighborhoods regarding your intentions for these two locations which have not allowed input from the community. Building these types of structures in this area will drastically increase traffic on roads that are not built to handle this influx. The Morello Terrace location is a steep hillside that cannot handle this type of structure and it is unclear if an environmental impact study or geological study has been completed of the area. Both proposed locations will cause dire disruptions to the local environment and wildlife habitat in the area that use the open space as corridors. Deer, coyote, turkey and many other animals already have to cross these roads and avoid traffic. This will only increase the destruction of their habitat and survival in our ~ighborhoods. The open space, wildlife and tranquility is why we moved to the. area. The structures being proposed in .. 1ese two locations will also disrupt the current housing privacy and uniformity of the neighborhoods and the tranquility that exists. The city has neglected to look into other locations within Plea~ant Hill where these types of structures will fit. You must object and appeal the State's finding that the JC Penny Furniture site isn't the best solution for this mandated housing along with considering other loc~tions such as the old Black Angus site. Even if we did not live in this neighborhood, we would still be objecting to this proposal. The city of Pleasant Hill can do better.

We will be attending the meeting this evening in support of not approving these proposals.

Sincerely,
Christine Culshaw/Howard and Mark Howard
1209 Ridgeview Place
Pleasant Hill CA
Sent from Mail for Windows
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2206 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:
· shirley shelangoski <sjs_ [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :28 AM
Planning
Rezoning Proposal
5-3 letter to PH City council Planning meeting.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Members of the Pleasant Hill City Council Planning Commission:

I am objecting to the rezoning of Morello Terrace solely for the purpose of building a new apartment complex to house approximately 196 units and/or a proposal including similar rezoning on Paso Nogal. Although I understand that there is not currently a plan in place, I would discourage you from considering these sites.

I object for reasons of the dramatic impact to the area. I live in the Ridgeview Homeowners Association just above the possible proposed site(s). It is my understanding that this was already declined during the last proposal due to the firefighter's pleas that safety would be impacted in the congestion in an emergency.

Traffic is already extremely heavy in that area and especially on Alhambra, Pleasant Hill Road and Morello. Parking many new vehicles would be overwhelming to nearby neighborhoods. There are no nearby readily available transit sites as indicated in Senate Bill

10. Residents would have to either walk, bike long distances or park a car in an area not designed to contain that amount of vehicles. The area is already impacted by heavy commuter traffic due to residents and non-residents driving to area schools such as College Park High School, Valley View Middle School and Valhalla Elementary School. In addition, Diablo Valley College lies a very short distance away and is primarily a commuter school.

The environment would be severely impacted and wildlife habitat would be decimated. The entire hillside will be excavated. No longer could local coyotes, wild turkeys, raccoon, deer and ground squirrel populations flourish as they are currently in their natural state. They cannot reasonably all move to Hidden Lakes· Park and Paso Nogal Park due to the heavy influx of new human population. They will risk slow extinction and the eco cycle will be destroyed. A huge amount of diesel fuel will be required to excavate this hillside to accommodate the gradation of the hill slope.

We have so little open space in Pleasant Hill. Code 65400 sets definite guidelines for implementation of the General Plan to serve as a measure for orderly growth and development. It provides for the preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources.

The multi-unit complex will not blend into the natural surrounding area. The density, architecture and land use would not match the peaceful area complete with free-roaming animals who are able to thrive in the small remaining area of open space remaining in our city. I would strongly object to any new rezoning for the purpose of housing new apartment buildings. Please consider the environmental impact, the increased noise level, increased traffic and safety to our area. Please do not give in to profit and corporate interests over the best interests of residents already residing in the area.

Respectfully submitted,
Shirley Shelangoski
159 Southwind Drive
Pleasant Hill 94523
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2207 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:
christine culshaw <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11:12 AM
Planning
Morello Terrace and Paso Nogal Objection of High Density Apartment Complex - Rezoning
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To the Planning Committee of the City of Pleasant Hill, We are writing to inform the planning committee of the city of Pleasant Hill of our objection to the building of high density apartment complexes at both the Morello Terrace and Paso Nogal locations. As far as we are aware, both locations are zoned for single family homes not huge apartment high density complexes of hundreds of units. There has been a total lack of transparency and notice from the city to the neighborhoods regarding your intentions for these two locations which have not allowed input from the community. Building these types of structures in this area will drastically increase traffic on roads that are not built to handle this influx. The Morello Terrace location is a steep hillside that cannot handle this type of structure and it is unclear if an environmental impact study or geological study has been completed of the area. Both proposed locations will cause dire disruptions to the local environment and wildlife habitat in the area that use the open space as corridors. Deer, coyote, turkey and many other animals already have to cross these roads and avoid traffic. This will only increase the destruction of their habitat and survival in our neighborhoods. The open space, wildlife and tranquility is why we moved to the area. The structures being proposed in these two locations will also disrupt the current housing privacy and uniformity of the neighborhoods and the tranquilit,, that exists. The city has neglected to look into other locations within Pleasant Hill where these types of structures will fit. You must object and appeal the State's finding that the JC Penny Furniture site isn't the best solution for this mandated housing along with considering other locations such as the old Black Angus site. Even if we did not live in this neighborhood, we would still be objecting to this proposal. The city of Pleasant Hill can do better.

We will be attending the meeting this evening in support of not approving these proposals.

Sincerely,
Christine Cutshaw/Howard and Mark Howard
1209 Ridgeview Place
Pleasant Hill CA
Sent from Mail for Windows
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2208 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( "Om:
;Sent:

To:

Subjed:

Phyllis Baker < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :05 AM
Planning
City Public Hearing re: plans for 396 units in Morello Ave & Paso Noga! Rd. Pleasant Hill.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I object to the development of these units.

Reason:

Traffic is already heavy in these areas due to Morello Ave being a through street to Martinez.

There are four schools in this area, this is their main passage. · A number of residents have asked for help time and time again by the traffic Planning Commission to improve the speed on Morello Ave. We have been told time after time something was in the works and still nothing has been done.

People don't honor stop signs and there are no traffic lights between Taylor Rd and Chilpancingo Parkway near Hidden Lakes Park. Also between Morello Ave and Alhambra Ave. This area becomes a race track, drag race strip and side shows.

Please, Please reconsider this area for development.

Best regards,
Phyllis Baker
1881 Morello Ave
easant Hill, Ca 94523
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2209 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To: .

Subject:

Timothy Keil <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :02 AM
Planning
Morello Terrace Zoning
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello, I live at 63 Janin Place in the Golf Ridge Homeowners Association Association development. My wife and I strongly oppose the rezoning proposal as do the other owners of homes on J anin whom I have spoken with. There is a high probability that adding 196 units at the site would create issues of great concern to those neighboring t4e project. Aside from ruining aesthetics and environmental concerns, the main concern we have is the logistical nightmare that would occur. There is limited parking on Netherby, Douglas Terrace and Janin Place. Unless the 196 unit development provides two parking spaces per unit, there would potentially be overflow wherein residents and visitors would be seeking street parking. There could be traffic on our streets where persons are seeking parking to visit residents. These folks would potentially take street parking spaces from J anin residents which are vital to our community.

Another major concern is safely/security. Presently, the only cars that drive on Janin are residents--partners in our HOA community. With 196 rentals, there no doubt could be many dozens of folks seeking parking and walking in our development. We would have no idea who they were and I believe would make our development the target of crime.

There are multiple other reasons for concern, as well.

Thank you for your consideration of long standing residents of our community.

Timothy Keil and Laura Keil
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2210 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ,rom:
~ent:

To:

Subject:
jenny ng <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :02 AM
Planning
Objection for Paso Nogal high-density, low-income housing plan CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

This correspondence is for public comment at the Commission meeting.

Paso Nogal Road is a narrow and windy 2-way single lane on the hillside connecting Alhambra and Morello. With the planned addition of 508 units (298 lower income} from both the Paso Nogal and Morello Terrace sites per Table 3 of the April 12 GPAC meeting materials, we can easily envision having 1,000 more cars and increased traffic up to tenfold to this single lane road and exacerbate all dangers cited below to both humans and wildlife.

A lot of commute traffic use this road as a short cut during rush hour. Sometimes 10 to 20 cars simultaneously pass through both directions at 40-45 mph, although the speed limit is 35 mph. Many times cars are impatient with those observing the speed limit and tailgating or cut into the lane in the opposite direction to pass other cars dangerously.

Secondly, there is no bike lane on this narrow road, and bicyclists traverse this narrow road from time to time with cars having to follow slowly behind - and cars are impatient these days, creating dangerous situations as aforementioned.

Thirdly, Paso Noga I Road is a cross through for wildlife such as deers and wild turkeys. Occasionally we see cars having to stop for the wildlife until they've passed. Additional traffic will endanger our wildlife.

Fourthly, with the much higher population density and increased traffic, it will be disastrous for all residents to be able to evacuate in a -•~m~ly manner In the event of any natural disasters such as earthquake or wildfires. rlousing plan and rezoning need to take road expansion/improvements and other factors into consideration (e.g. making Paso Noga! double-lane in both directions, adding bike lanes, addressing blind curves safety, ensuring road not being partially flooded during rainy season, increasing setbacks from the road, etc.}. Such improvements will necessarily reduce your calculated RHNA units, especially for the Paso Nogal site.

I hereby oppose the rezoning of these 2 sites from Single Family to Multiple Family, High Density until these issues are adequately addressed.

Sincerely,
Jenny Ng
Long time Pleasant Hill resident
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2211 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Vickie Wetzel <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11 :02 AM
Planning
Item for disq.Jssion at tonight's City Public Hearing - "Low Income High Density" Hous.ing to be built
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

From:

Vickie C. Wetzel
604 Pasatiempo Court
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Resident owner at this address for over 22 years.

Statement:

I understand that City Council is currently in the planning process for "Low Income High Density" housing (up to as many as 396 units) to be built on 2 beautiful open spaces: Paso Nogal between Morello Avenue and Alhambra Road and on Morello Avenue near the comer of Paso Nogal. I moved to my current address over 2~ years ago from San Francisco. I am a professional who pays property taxes faithfully each year. My rates hav ... increased by over 119% from 2000 when I purchased my new home. I currently pay over $10,000 annually in property taxes. I'm sadden~ to hear of this planning being proposed and oppose it greatly.

The building ofup to as many as 396 units to be built on such a beautiful surrounding neighborhood is a shame for us residents and Pleasant Hill. We already have enough apartments in the surrounding area as a result of DVC being nearby. We have teachers on our block that can testify how the schools here will be brought down by the building of these low-income housing. The entire area will become another Antioch! I have already seen Plesant Hill go down near our area with tattoo parlors, gun shops and stores that draw homeless and riffraff. I believe that there has been no effort on the Council's part to bring in or attract any business that is high end in our area of Pleasant Hill. Furthermore, this project will most likely bring over 800 additional cars on the road each morning and night and over 1,000 people in this small area.

I OPPOSE THIS "LOW: INCOME HIGH DENSITY" HOUSING IN MY NEIBORHOOD.

Thank you,
Vickie
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2212 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
~,om: Parastou Youssefi <[email protected]>
Jent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:59 AM
To: Planning
Subject: Opposition to proposed housing development on Morello and Paso Nogal/Netherby + Paso Nogal between Morello and Alhambra
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: The Planning Commission of City of Pleasant Hill
From: Parastou Youssefi
Owner of the property located at:
77 J anin Place
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Re: Opposition to the City of Pleasant Hill's proposal to build additional housing on Morello Avenue
Dear Planning Commission of City of Pleasant Hill:

As a property owner on Janin Place adjacent to the proposed development on the comer of Morello and Netherby/Paso Nogal Rd, I strongly object to the development of the proposed four story, multi-building, 196-unit apartment complex on Morello and Paso Nogal/Netherby, as well as the proposed building on Paso Nogal between Morello and Alhambra.

While I am in support of construction of more affordable housing units in the city, this particular proposal and location does not take environmental nor traffic concerns into consideration:
1) Drastic increase in traffic, noise and air pollution:

This is a huge development for this particular area. For the proposed development on the comer of Morello and Paso Nogal/Netherby, with 196 units - assuming at best, an average of 2 people per unit - resulting in 300-400 additional cars in a neighborhood not designed nor equipped to handle that many cars, it is safe to assume the results for traffic, noise and air pollution are substantial, impacting the health and air quality for surrounding residents. There will be drastic overspill of vehicle parking into neighboring streets such as on Douglas Terrace, St Germain Place, Netherby Street, Netherby Place, Janin Place, Fairway Place, Morello Avenue, Ridgeview Drive, Ridgeview Place. The city has very poor walkability and public transportation and therefore it is highly reasonable to assume cars would be the residents' primary form of transportation.
2) Complete degradation of the environment/wildlife habitat As the entire hillside area will need to be excavated, local wildlife will be impacted. This hillside is an important corridor for local coyote, opossum, raccoon, deer, turkey, and ground squirrel populations to migrate between Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nogal Park. Without the ability to traverse this plot, roadkill events will continue to Increase and further decimate our local wildlife 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2213 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) population. The excavation of this hillside will also transform a mild/moderate natural gradient slope to a vertical gradient to accommodate a four-story, multi-building complex which would require thousands of gallons of diesel fuel needed to grade the slopes. This destruction of openspace land is absolutely at odds with the guidance set forth In Government~Code 65400. 3- Severe disruption to the quiet and privacy unique to the area The proposed four-story apartment complex would be completely singular in its density, architecture, and land usage compared to the surrounding area. The resulting increase in population density would negate the intended surrounding building edges, transition, context, and privacy.

I therefore request the Planning Commission to seriously consider these objections and concerns and REJECT the proposed developments in two locations of Pleasant Hill (namely Paso Nogal Road/Morello Avenue and Paso Nogal Road between Morello Avenue and Alhambra Road).

Sincerely,
Parastou Youssefi
202-805-2705
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2214 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
'=rom:
.1ent:

To:

Subject:

Caitlin Benazra <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:57 AM
Planning
No High Density Housing on Paso Nogal!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom it may Concern,
I recently purchased a Townhome in the Wildflower development on Paso Nogal. What drew me to the area were the beautiful hills and trees surrounding the street. It is quiet and peaceful. It is one of the few areas of PH that remains this way.

I was very disappointed to hear that these two projects are being proposed. Development of such high density housing would be an eyesore in our area. The noise of the construction and increased traffic would be horrific.

I heard that the JC Penney site was also considered. I do not understand why this location is no longer a consideration. It would make great use of an abandoned site. It would bring more business to the surrounding stores. That spot has great access to the freeway for those who live there.

I understand the need for housing in our areas, but this isn't the place to build it! Thank you for your consideration!
-.. aitlin Benazra
108 Poppy Place
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
(925) 640-1151
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2215 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Scott Sanders < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:56 AM
Planning
Letter of objection to proposed development of 196 unit Apartment Morello Terrace CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unl~ss you recognize the sender.

Dear Planning Commission,
My wife and I will not be able to attend the planning meeting tonight, due to only receiving notice about it yesterday. We wanted to share with you though that the proposed development of a four story apartment complex on Morello Terrace is extremely disturbing to us. That location is not ideal at all due to the increased traffic/congestion, street parking, and noise to an otherwise very serene neighborhood. In addition; you woul~ be destroying a very beautiful open space in Pleasant Hill.

We currently live on Norse Drive, but my wife grew up in that exact area so we are quite familiar with it. We believe the congestion will also severely impact the streets where school traffic (Valhalla/Valley View/College Park/DVC) is already a constant issue.

It does not appear that there is any rationale for the proposal to build on that site. We heard mention of the old JC Penny home store as a possible site, which better fits the scope of multi-unit housing. There is room to provide plenty of parking for the residents, as well as a great location due to the ability to walk to public transportation, shopping, and restaurants. And the new apartments/landscaping would also have a positive impact on the aesthetics in that location (vs. removing a lovely open space).

Please take our feedback into consideration and also report back to the community with the results of the meeting. Many of the neighbors in the area feel this proposal is something that the City attempted to pass without any input from the Pleasant Hill residents.

Thank you.

Scott and Lora Sanders
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2216 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
~,om:
.;ent:

To:

Subject:

DARREN HALL <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:48 AM
Planning
Morello Terraces and Paso Nogal rezoning public meeting May 3rd 2023 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern;
My name is Darren Hall, I reside and have been the owner of the property located at 405 Sprucewood Court, Pleasant Hill California. I have lived in this home for 25 years and am submitting these comments related to the city of Pleasant Hill's study and discussions regarding the rezoning of the areas designated in the studies as Morello Terraces and Paso Nogal.

While I understand the need to provide housing, I vehemently OPPOSE any changes to these two vacant sites, identified as Morello Terraces (APN 154-140-015) and Paso Nogal (APN 152-010-004). I OPPOSE rezoning from R20 (Single Family - 20,000 sq ft Lots) and R15 (Single Family- 15,000 sq ft Lots), respectively, to MRH (Multiple-family - High Density), which allows 30-40 du/ac. areas, Any such rezoning would be extremely inconsistent with the existing neighborhood, existing housing stock, architectural design.
fhese comments can be used publicly and at the meeting scheduled for May 3rd, as I will be unable to attend but wanted my voice heard in my opposition to any changes to these two APNs.

Respectfully,
Darren C. Hall
25-year Pleasant Hill resident
Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2217 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Adrian Mercado <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:40 AM
Planning
High Density Housing Plan on/near Paso Nagai Road
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello,
I was recently made aware of plans to build high density housing in two location on/near Paso Nogal Roadspecifically, one on Paso Nogal Road between Alhambra Road and Morello Ave and a second on Morello Ave near the comer of Paso Nogal (Morello Terraces).

While I have concern with what will happen to property values in the area due to having any kind ofhighdensity housing added (regardless of if it's low income or otherwise), there is a greater concern for traffic and safety when population and vehicular activity are drastically increased all at once in a small area.

I have great concern with how increasing the population of that area by nearly an order of magnitude (up to 1000 people with up to 800 vehicles) would increase traffic in the area tremendously. Paso Nogal Road between Morello Ave and Alhambra Road is a windy two-lane road with almost no shoulder and blind curves. Adding potentially hundreds of vehicles traveling up and down that portion of road would be a nightmare for getting around the area. Has any kind of traffic study been done to check how it could be affected?
Has a similar type of traffic study been done to analyze the traffic on, at least, the section of road that would be affected by adding high density housing to "Morello Terraces"? The road there is certainly larger, but more traffic controls would be needed to prevent accidents- particularly since it's in an area near several schools where many children (with parents) walk to school. It's also a popular location for people who do walking/bicycling so dedicated lanes for that purpose would also need to be considered. Otherwise, there would be significant risk of traffic accidents and potential traffic;..related injury/fatality especially when increasing population and traffic activity so drastically and all at once.

How about the electric grid and utility demands and infrastructure for the same in the area? Has that been considered in this plan? Will the roads and utility infrastructure be upgraded to handle such a large increase in demand?
While carrying out the plan may benefit some, has its effect on the current population in that area been considered? Is there any recompense for residents who suddenly find that their home :values have been reduced? Or the change in quality oflife when a low-density neighborhood suddenly has its population increased by up to an order of magnitude?
Please reconsider carrying out the plan for high density housin~.

Thanks,
Adrian Mercado
682 Paso Nogal Road
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2218 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
~om:
... ent:

To:

Jessica Grant <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:36 AM
Planning
Subject: Planning feedback from long-time Pleasant Hill resident CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Pleasant Hill Planning Committee,
I am writing to share my feedback with you about the planning for 250 to 300 more units in the Morello/Paso Nogal area. I will join the meeting tonight at 6:30 pm as well.

I am not supportive of this development.

The street, Paso Nogal, is a small two-lane road and not suited to more traffic nor can it support more.

The area is quite dense already with heavy traffic.

This area is already quite congested with traffic due to DVC and the schools in our area.

The schools are overcrowded. My son has gone to all 3 schools: Valhalla, Valley View and now College Park and his classes are too full already. Also, he even has to share a locker with another student.

Paso Nogal is a major connecting street for all the residences t~ get to Alhambra and from Alhambra to Morello.

Thank you for reading and considering my input.
( ssica Grant
.:i09 Valley High Drive, Pleasant Hill
925-890-2090
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2219 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Deborah Gross <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:34 AM
Planning
Public Comment Submission for Planning Commission Meeting on May 3, 2023 Planning Mtg Comments.doc
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

The following is for public comment at the Commission meeting this evening, May 3, 2023:
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2220 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
-=rom:
..,ent:

To:

Subject:

Ian McRae <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:33 AM
Planning
Public Hearing Question - Paso Nogal High Density Low Income CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Pleasant Hill City Council,
With this email I have provided a question that I would like posed at the Public Hearing that is taking place today (5/3) at 6:30pm, for purposes of public discussion.

I am a passionate resident with extensive experience in environmental planning, civil engineering, urban design and landscape architecture - currently teaching at multiple departments at UC Berkeley and working as an industry professional.

Question For Public Discussion:

Pleasant Hill is defined by its valuable public open space and critical ecological systems, instead of building on undeveloped natural environments, has there been real evaluation/consideration of instead developing High Density Low Income Housing on underutilized infill lots ( e.g., Sunvalley Mall Parking Lots) that are more ~ntral to critical resources and already supplied with properly sized public utilities/infrastructure? Infill reuse is d more environmentally responsible approach that would better align with the city and community's mission, and would present an opportunity to mitigate the negative effects of highly impervious surfaces that contribute to poor stormwater performance and excess urban heat island effects.

Thanks for the opportunity to contribute to today's conversation.

Best,
Ian
Project Strategist
Sherwood Design Engineers
University Lecturer
College of Environmental Design
College of Civil and Environmental Engineering
UC Berkeley
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2221 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jeff Bell <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:26 AM
Planning
5/3/2023 - Written Public Comment Planning Commission
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Attention Planning Commission: This correspondence is for public comment at the Commission meeting.

We are writing to formally object to the recommendation to rezone two vacant sites identified as Morello Terraces (APN 154-140-015) and Paso Nogal (APN 152-010-004) from R20 and R15 respectively to MRH (Multi-Family-High-Density).

As residents whose home backs up to Paso Noga I, we already have increased safety concerns due to traffic volume.

There have been issues with cars wrecking into our property and near to it in the past. The increased traffic from high density housing will only exacerbate the issue and our concerns. In addition, the noise levels from the increased traffic will grow. Our property value will be negatively impacted as our home will be less desirable with the increased noise and safety risk.

Please consider alternative locations and do not rezone this area.

Sincerely,
Jeff and Nga Bell
10 Pillon Real
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2222 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
"'Om:
...,ent:

To:

Subject:
margarita· rodriguez <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:25 AM
Planning
Low Income High Density
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello!
I am a resident of PH and with a location exactly opposite to the proposed project.

I like to bring up few urgent points. for your consideration:

1. Lack of notice from the city. We are aware now because a neighbor was kind enough to knock on my door and share the news couple of days ago.

2. When we bought the property 21 years ago it was the result of a long research of a place where we can raise our kids and now grand kids without worrying so much about the surroundings. We have a 4 month old grand baby.

3. We have been paying taxes at a high rate and we continue to see increases, and we have taken it as a price ,r peace and comfort for our family members.

4. Try to develop this project where there is more visibility and high foot traffic such as close to the malls, or other areas. There are plenty of properties around that the city may be able to purchase.

5. Consider partnering with other cities with more available land to build.

Please consider more transparency with your projects.

Thank you,
Margarita Rodriguez
Highly concerned PH resident
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2223 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyon, Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Lisa Cuti no < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:14 AM
Planning
Rocky Howington; [email protected]; Elizabeth Pentacoff May 3 City Council Meeting - Housing Proposal
PH City Script.docx
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear City Council/Planning Commission:

In case I am not provided an opportunity to speak tonight, I wanted to add a couple more thoughts to the attached letter I submitted earlier this week.

Is it possible to rezone some of the empty retail buildings to accommodate high density/low income housing? Specifically, the Bed, Bath and Beyond building and the old Lucky/Orchard Supply building that has been empty for quite some time. That area is close to a lot of amenities within walking distance and would not be disruptive to an ·already ~xisting community.

Also, will the community have an opportunity to vote on this proposal? Sincerely,
Tony and Lisa Cutino
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2224 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
- .. om:
.... ent:

To:

Subject:

Robert Seidenspinner < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 10:06 AM
Planning
City Public Hearing Wed. May 3rd, 6:30 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello
I will attend the meeting.

I have concerns regarding the stance the City Council is taking regarding the proposal to decrease the open space and replace it with low cost hi density housing and the impact on the surrounding neighbors.

Have we changed directions on the values of our City?
Where else have we looked, where else in the city footprint do we currently have high density housing, what about infrastructure -roads, sewer, water, electric power, Parking?? Importantly the impact on Nature, wildlife movement, air.

Because of poor planing in the past we are losing open space.

How will existing schools already stretched support the added population? ( "lank you
.ob
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2225 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Jason Robards <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:55 AM
Planning
[email protected]
letter of objection
letter of objection.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern,
Attached is our formal letter of objection to the rezoning proposal regarding the intersection of Morello A venue and Paso Nogal Road.

Sincerely,
Jason Robards and Rashmi Risbud
Douglas Terrace, Pleasant Hill
(925) 285-133 7
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2226 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
t=rom:
~ent:

To:

Subject:

Emory Ronevich <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:54 AM
Planning
Low cost housing in Morello
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To the Pleasant Hill planning department,
I am writing to express my concern over a new low cost housing development proposal. While I do support the idea of low cost housing, I'm very concerned about the attached school systems. My children currently attend Valhalla elementary (which is where the new families in these low cost housing units would be attending). Our school currently has many classrooms at max capacity (32 kids -which is the teachers union limit on class size). Adding this much additional housing would push these class sizes even larger. I think the city needs to consider this before moving forward on these housing options.

One other issue is the traffic on morello. This past summer there was road construction near the paso nogal intersection and it nearly brought traffic to a standstill. Especially during school drop off and pick up times. Adding this many additional units will obviously bring in much more traffic. Is this being taken into account? Stop signs may have to be replaced with stop lights.

Respectfully,
~mory and Joe Ronevich
422 Verbena Ct, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2227 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Alex Armando <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:45 AM
Planning
Low Income High Density Housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern,
I object to any high density low income housing projects within the City of Pleasant Hill.

Thank you,
Alex Armando
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2228 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
~om:

Jent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Troy Fujimoto
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:23 AM
Troy Fujimoto
FW: Morello Terraces
Pleasant Hill Planning Committee.pdf
From: Ardene Nakagawa <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 6:16 AM
To: [email protected]; Troy Fujimoto <[email protected]> Subject: Morello Terraces
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Please accept my letter objecting to the rezoning of Morello Terraces.

Thank you,
Ardene Nakagawa
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2229 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Reza Rohani <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:19 AM
Planning
We Object the Proposed Rezoning Plan for Morelo Ave. and Paso Nagai CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

We the Rohani family, resident of I 007 Ridgeview Place, Pleasant Hill, strongly support the objections raised by the Board of Directors of the Maderia Heights Townhouse Associ~tion regarding the devastating impacts that the implementation of this plan will bring to the natural environment, traffic condition, social structure and quality of life of this small serene community.

We are also absolutely disappointed by 'lack of transparency' of the City's General Planning Advisory Committee required by state laws and disapprove this action.

The execution of this plan will also bring about a catastrophic gentrification to this part of Pleasant Hill which will cause many residents move out, a decision that will have a huge negative impact on businesses, schools and social events of the city and its businesses, and the general status of the community.

City administrators are expected to gentrify their community toward a higher status, life style and tranquility, contrary to what the proposed plan is forecasting for our community. Is this what the present administration is leaving as its legacy for the future of the city? Regards,
RezaRohani
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2230 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
om:
:,ent:

To:

Subject:
[email protected]
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:16 AM
Planning _
Resident letter regarding Planning Commission hearing on zoning proposal 5/3/2023 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Planning commission,
As a lifelong resident of Pleasant Hill, I've watched the open spaces in this town be developed, one after another. The open hills of Pleasant Hill are becoming more scarce and are mostly hidden behind residential and commercial developments than are accessible from the city streets.

With the notable exception of the turkeys, the amount of wildlife that roamed Pleasant Hill 30 years ago is dramatically down. I used to see foxes, deer, skunks and coyotes regularly. Now they are an uncommon sight, hanging onto the small patches of disappearing open space.

Besides the environmental impact and deterioration of the remaining open space of Pleasant Hill, the logistics of adding a high volume unit residential complex to either of the zones on Paso Noga I or Morello is a logistical faceplant. Both these sites run off one lane roads. Paso Nogal in both directions and Morello to the North. The negative traffic impact here would be noticeable for all residents. How they could build these units with adequate parking without going up is _qurrowing down is hard to envision
1 m not against building new large multifamily residential complexes -even with the net outflow of population in California these days-but these sites are poorly chosen for the purpose. Something flatter, larger and with better traffic access would make more sense.

Find a better spot for these proposals than steep hills with small roads.

Best regards,
David Hutchins
Homeowner and business owner of Pleasant Hill
232 Netherby Place
925-286-4684
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2231 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
ent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:
[email protected]
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:13 PM
Planning
[email protected]; rodato [email protected]
High Density Housing input for May 3, city council meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern at Pleasant Hill City Council,
My comments are public regarding tonight's city council meeting about High Density Low Income Housing on two parcels in Pleasant Hill:

Paso Nogal Road between Alhambra and Morello and Morello Terraces at the intersection of Morello and Paso Nogal Rd.

I believe that neither of these semi-rural properties are a good fit for 196 or 262 units and that these projects would be a better fit closer to downtown which have more services nearby.

Reasons being:
- There is already a traffic jam during rush hour at the eastbound intersection of Taylor Blvd at Pleasant Hill Road/Alhambra in the afternoons which is a traffic hazard. ~ Paso Nogal Road is a narrow, winding road that is dangerous with people driving at high speeds. - This narrow road cannot be widened to accommodate hundreds more cars each day. - This would impact the semi-rural nature of the existing neighborhoods. - There aren't any services close by for low income people to use public transportation etc. 1m not opposed to adding this type of housing to the city of Pleasant Hill, I just think there would be more suitable areas ..... 1oser to the downtown and Contra Costa Blvd where High Density housing would be a better fit.

Sincerely,
Basha Kooler
Mesa Verde Place
Pleasant Hill
• DESIGN
Basha Kooler
President
Kooler Design Studio
3527 Mt. Diablo Blvd. #256
Lafayette CA 94549
www.koolerdesign.com
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2232 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

George Tereshko <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3,, 2023 2:10 PM
Planning
Objections to the planning
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

We strongly oppose the Plan!
Please do not plan it!
"Low Income High Density" project is not welcome!
George Tereshk:o family.
2017 Morello ave. Pleasant Hill CA 94523
(925)687-6597
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2233 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ... ,om:

Jent:

To:

Subject:

Kathleen Maxwell < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:05 PM
Planning
Developments at morello/Paso Nogal and Paso Nogal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I want to register my objection to the number of development units proposed for the 6 acre parcel at Morello and Paso Nogal and for the 3 acre parcel on Paso Nogal.

First the traffic is heavy on Morello and Paso Nogal especially at commute times and school times. The noise of the greatly increased traffic will impact all neighborhoods in the area and the air and noise pollution will increase a lot from exhaust and more people. Pleasant Hill schools will be even more overcrowded which is not fair to those who live here. The density proposed is far too great--1 know Pleasant Hill has to build more housing but it shouldn't be all in only 2 places. These units should blend with the surroundings which are 1 and 2 story homes, not multiple stories. And they should be spread out and blend in like the other homes in the area.

People cross Paso Nogal to go to the park and even now traffic doesn't always stop so they can safely cross--this will only get worse with more traffic. Paso Nogal is a narrow 2 lane road and can't adequately handle the increased volume of traffic. Even now it is sometimes hard to make left turns from side streets when traffic is heavy and traffic backs up at the stoplight at Alhambra Ave.

It doesn't seem like the planning commission has considered the environmental impact these developments will have on the area and the city. I would urge you to reject the current plan.

Thank you
Kathleen Maxwell
704 Kenton Ct.
· easant Hill, CA
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2234 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Maria Banghart < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 20~3 2:02 PM
Planning
Proposal for high density housing on Paso Nogal and Morello hillsides CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Pleasant Hill planning commission,
I was shocked and saddened to learn late last week of the plan to put high density housing on two small hillsides on both ends of the windy, dangerous, and already highly trafficked Paso Nogal Road. I live in the Wildflower neighborhood and it is already dangerous to make a left turn out of our neighborhood. That these two sites zoned for low density hillside housing of 7 and 15 units are suddenly being considered for massive housing structures of up to 136 and 262 units is so alarming it was beyond anything I even thought was in the realm of possibility for the area. It will alter the character of the surrounding neighborhoods and drastically impact our lives.

Pleasant Hills own municipal code states that it is supposed to "preserve the character and quality of residential neighborhoods." It is the first item listed under its purposes. And the first purpose listed under the Hillside Planned Unit Development district (which both these sites fall under) is to "Preserve the physical and visual identity of the hills and ridgelines of Pleasant Hill and the natural geologic conditions consistent with the city-wide design guidelines while allowing controlled development."·
Do we throw away all the stated values for Pleasant Hill and it's planned growth because the state has mandated some quota to fulfill? It appears that the city is trying to meet all its state mandated high density low income housing totals on these two small hills that do not hav.e the infrastructure in place to handle this nor access to public transportation.

Even the state's new SB 10 law which I am assuming is where the authority to do this comes from states that the high density housing is supposed to be in one of the following:
(A) a transit-rich area
(B) an urban infill site
Per the laws wording, it appears to fit neither. Also it allows for only up to 10 units per lot maximum, so even by these standards, this is a drastic overreach.

We only found out about these plans because one of our board members saw a posting on Next Door. Since then we have tried to get the information out to our neighbors. Most were not aware or had just recently found out as well. For this drastic of a change, it is unconscionable to not properly notify or involve the residents in the area whose lives are going to be greatly impacted.

We purchased our home in 1994 because it was a planned low density hillside development that protected open space. It is the nature of this area and homeowners purchased their homes here for this reason. It is a jewel of preserved hillsides and open space amongst the densely populated Bay Area. There is abundant wildlife that live and traverse through the area especially with Paso Nogal park nearby. Deer and wild turkeys regularly cross the roads in this area.

I realize there is state pressure to meet housing quotas but the city of Pleasant Hill needs to stand up to the state and preserve the nature of what makes Pleasant Hill such a wonderful place to live, it is right in the name, pleasant hills.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2235 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) This message is for public correspondence at the May 3rd planning meeting.

Thank you for your consideration of our concerns,
' ,.faria Banghart
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2236 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subjed:

Attachments:

Curt Hill <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:01 PM
Planning
New housing development
image0Jpeg; image1Jpeg; ATT00001.txt
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I would like to start by opposing theses new projects for housing. Pleasant hill has always enjoyed a nice natural feel to it. The sign even shows a tree in it. This town doesn't need to buil,d on every square inch to make new high density housing. Morello already has traffic problems. We have accidents at the corner of Viking and morello a few times a year.

The planning department told me 4 years ago they we going to convert it to a 2 lane road with a center divide. This hasn't happened. Look at the 2 accidents in pictures below in the last 2 months. This doesn't even address the impact it will do to the s,chool district that is overwhelmed to say the least.

See you tonight
Curt hill
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2237 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
·om:
.sent:

To:

Subject:

Paul Niedringhaus < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:01 PM
Planning
Objection to Morello Terrace
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hi,
This is in response to the 196 apartment complex proposal for Morello Terrace. I live nearby and this project is entirely out of sync with the character of the neighborhood. I also read a section of your planning document that said that "flexible parking standards" may be allowed, any deviation below 2 spaces per apartment is a disaster for the local streets.

Thank you for your con~ideration.

Paul
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2238 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Richard Perruso <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :51 PM
Planning
Morello Terraces and Paso Nagai Developments
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I am writing to express my objection to the nearly 300 units proposed on Morello Drive and Paso Nogal Road. I am particularly opposed to this proposal because of the impact it will have on traffic, schools, and the quality of life in my neighborhood.

Traffic Hazards
As a resident of Daisy Place, I would be especially impacted by the increased traffic on Paso Nogal and Morello. The residents of Wildflower HOA, comprised of 62 units, exit directly on to Paso Nogal from both sides of Wildflower Drive, and we already find it dangerous and difficult to enter Paso Nogal given the limited sight lines created by the curving road. This is especially true during morning rush hour and on afternoons when the dog park is open. In addition, the narrow, curved, sloped area of Paso Nogal between Alhambra and Pinon Real is an especially hazardous area to navigate currently. Paso Nogal was not designed to handle the level of traffic it currently experiences, but adding such a large number of drivers and pedestrians will further endanger us all. Mitigation srategies will not be enough to keep us all safe.

Overwhelmed schools
Concentrating so many units all within such a small radius also increases the pressure on Valhalla Elementary, Valle View Middle, and College Park High. None of these campuses currently have the capacity to take on so many new students; they do not have the infrastructure, the staff, or the space to house the kids of all of these new families. By placing the burden solely on these three campuses, you are overburdening an already strained region of Mount Diablo School District. This is also not the best way to accomodate the needs of new residents, nor serve the present parents, students, and staff of these wonderful schools.

Quality of Life
My husband and I have spent the last 26 years in Pleasant Hill and we have lived on every end of it. On Coggins Drive we appreciated the low rent and the easy access to BART and the freeway. On Treat Boulevard we continued to enjoy low rent and access to services and walking trails. Twinbridge Circle afforded us convenience and quiet for a reasonable rent. When we finally could afford to buy we were committed to staying in Pleasant Hill because of the quality of life we have enjoyed here. But when we found Daisy Place, we felt as though we had won the lottery: nature at our doorstep, stunning views, and lush, quiet tranquility makes this neighborhood truly unique. And your plan will ruin all of that ..

We are obviously not the only residents who feel let down by your judgement, since your plan will decimate our neighborhood, overwhelm our resources and interrupt the quiet enjoyment of our home. We seriously question your leadership, and wonder why you have rushed this plan with no obvious notice to the neighbors who are directly affected by it.
-Alison Perruso
520 Daisy Place
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2239 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( "'Om:
~ent:

To:

Subject:

Sonia Swaney < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :49 PM
Planning
Objection for Paso Nagai High Density low income housing plan CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom this may concern:

I am a currently resident of Paso Nogal and am objecting to rezoning Paso Nogal (APN 152-010-004) from single family (R20 and R15) to multiple Family High Density (MRH). I object to the plan of building a highdensity, low-income housing for the 3.4 acres open area directly across the road from Wildflower for the following reasons.

Currently exiting Wildflower is dangerous for residents due to the inability to see around the blind curve that exit throughout the hilly road. This road can barely contain the existing traffic so it is inconceivable to think of the additional traffic that would be added if the additional 90-130 units were added on this Paso No gal site.

There are currently no apartments in the area. Introducing them to the area would change the basic character of _faso Nogal.. The infrastructure is not designed for high density development. The Paso Nogal roads is narrow ith no sidewalks or curbs. The increased traffic would cause more congestion and be extremely dangerous for the entire community. Additionally, imminent domain is not a viable option since the land opposite the area is comprised of hills and other properties.

Additionally, the area in question is home to many animals to include wild turkey which are defined as Resident Upland Game Birds and are protected and managed by laws and regulations established by _Title 14 of the California Fish and Game Commission. I understand the importance of this but please consider other areas that may be a better option for all.

Thank you
Ms. Swaney
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2240 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Marc St. Marseille <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :47 PM
Planning
Marc St. Marseille
Paso Nogal housing project.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear City Council and Planning Commission Members,
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed development of high-density, low-income housing in our longestablished suburban neighborhood. While I understand the need for affordable housing in our city, I believe this particular location is not suitable for such a project.

Firstly, our neighborhood has a very low crime rate, and adding such a large housing development could potentially change the character of our community. Furthermore, there are limited stores and necessities in close proximity to the proposed site, which would create a hardship for the residents of the new development.

Additionally, I would like to draw your attention to the potential impact on traffic in the area. With 390+units, the proposed development would significantly increase the number of vehicles on our already busy streets. This would not only create congestion, but also potentially dangerous conditions for both pedestrians and drivers.

Furthermore, the increased traffic would have a negative impact on the environment, contributing to the already significant carbon footprint of our city. As a community, we should be working towards reducing our carbon footprint and promoting sustainable living.

In light of these concerns, I urge you to reconsider the proposed development and seek a more appropriate location for the construction of high-density, low-income housing. While the need for affordable housing is important, we must also consider the impact on our community and the environment.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Marc St Marseille
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2241 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
·om: ANN MULCAHY <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :45 PM
Planning
Sent:

To:

Cc: ANN MULCAHY; Marc Armstrong
Subject: Low income high density housing on/near Morello Ave and Paso Nagai Rd CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: The Pleasant Hill City Council May 2nd, 2023
We have been residents of Pleasant Hill for 20 years. We live off of Netherby Drive and the thought of having apartments built on the corner of Morello Ave and Douglas Terrace is alarming for many reasons:
• Property Values & Quality of Life: What impact will this low income housing property have on existing property values? What considerations have been given regarding the quality of the design, maintenance, and management of this low income housing development? Like many long term residents in Pleasant hill we have seen a significant increase of our home value. I would not be in favor of any proposal that would negatively impact my investment.
• Criine and Safety Concerns: The negative impact on Fire and Police Departments.

Our Police force is overworked as it is, what impact will these additional residents have on response times? Our Fire and EMS services could be impacted by additional calls for services.
• Infrastructure and Services: Our schools will be negatively impacted with an increase in class size and an increase in the demand for student services (academic counseling, special education, and health services etc). Where will the funding for these additional services come from? For example, 5 years ago when our child started at College Park, the Freshman class had over 700 students. Furthermore, students could not use the restrooms at break due to the long lines. Because of the limited number of lockers students had to share with another student, or not have one at all. Finally, class sizes increased to levels that were not enough desks to accommodate the students in the classroom. Some students had to sit on the floor. As a result we chose to transfer our child to another district that was not impacted. i
• Zoning and Land use Regulations: The proposed low income housing units are not an appropriate fit within the existing zoning and land use regulations. The location of the proposed apartments will negatively impact the current traffic patterns: Netherby, Pasa Nagai, and Douglas Terrace will be a nightmare. These are small narrow roads as it is. Besides, residents will want to park out on the streets and there is no room for this. .
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2242 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) • Maintenance and upkeep: These low income housing units may be subject to greater wear and tear due to frequent turnover of residents. Is there a limit on the number of occupants in each unit?
• Drainage and Soil Erosion Issues: Are there current soil and erosion issues? Both c these issues can significantly impact the surrounding environment, infrastructure, and property values.
• State and Local Government: Is the City of Pleasant Hill supporting this proposal or just compiling with the States requirement for low income housing? What company will do the construction? And will they take in any of these above concerns or are they just focused on money?
• PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE reconsider this location.

Respectfully Submitted,
Ann Mulcahy/ Marc Armstrong
23 Fairway Place
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
· (925) 246-9829
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2243 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) r
To: Pleasant Hill City Council
From: Donald Hill, property owner of 1772 Douglas Terrace, Pleasant Hill, CA Date: April 28, 2023
Re: Proposed housing for low-income
We have lived here since 1978. We chose this house because it is in a quiet place, has less traffic, and has beautiful sights. We love it here so much~ You want to build housing for low-income people? We voted "NO 250-300-unit housing here".

I am now 85s, disabled, and won't feel as safe with hundreds of apartments, people, and cars added to our street. Our concern is that the proposed new housing will increase traffic since Diablo Valley College and College Park High School are nearby. In turn, the increased traffic will make it dangerous for students who are riding their bikes. Drivers in a hurry could hit them. Also, new housing could lead to more crime. Please don't build new housing here. Period.
~a~~ Donald Hill

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2244 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Laura Bastin <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :44 PM
Planning
Low Incoming High Density Housing Concerns
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom it May Concern
I am a concerned resident of Pleasant Hill who is extremely concerned regarding the possible low income housing to built on Morello and Paso Nogal.

Living on the comer of Viking and Morello traffic is already horrific not to mention the horrible accidents we have had over the years and in the last two months, one taking out our neighbors truck and the other taking out a portion of my fence and the telephone pole. To add more traffic to the area is only a recipe for disaster. Car drive way too fast and we have been to the City on multiple occasions to try and get a stop sign or stop light at this comer at no avail. To add an additional 800 cars to this road will only cause more accidents and endanger not only residents but children and pedestrians crossing Morello to get to one of the 4 schools in the area.

Secondly our school are already busting at their seems and to add additional children to the school system will only decline the already subpar education our children are currently receiving. Taking resources away from those children that alrea4y have very little help.

Thirdly, you are placing this housing in an area that has minimal access to public transportation. How do you expect them to get to jobs and work if there is no accessible public transportation? In this area the shopping options are very limited for those without their own personal transportation. This type of housing should be placed where residents can easily access a grocery store or pharmacy.

There are better options out there. You are trying to stack more people in an already highly populated area that don't have easy access to transportation, jobs and-shopping. Come on Pleasant Hill, you are better than this.

Concerned Pleasant Hill Resident,
Laura Bastin
925-989-1232
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2245 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
.·om: Lynn Warner < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :44 PM
Planning
Sent:

To:

Subject: Proposed apartments on Morello Terraces and Paso Nogal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Pleasant Hill planning commission,
Please reconsider moving forward with the proposed plan of building apartments on Morello Terrace are and near Paso Nogal park. As homeowners
living at 1955 Morello for 10 years we strongly object to this plan for reasons following:
'1. Complete degradation of environment and habitat of these open space areas. We would propose analysis be done regarding the extent of damage to the environment and wildlife before moving forward. We specifically moved to this area of Pleasant hill because of the open space areas near our home·. Please, no more destruction of open space in PH!

2. Increased traffic through the local area and more already on a very busy Morello Ave. We would suggest impact analysis be completed regarding traffic and parking before moving forward.

3. Currently the surrounding area in question is comprised of private homes and condominiums. Large apartments complexes would be disruptive to the existing homes and neighborhood uniformity. We would propose analysis of alternative sites/strategies be done before moving forward.

Thank you for your consideration and time in this important matter, Robert and Lynn Warner
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2246 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sharon Mark <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :40 PM
Planning
City of Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan, 2023-2031 Housing CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

TO: Pleasant Hill Planning Committee:

RE: City of Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan, 2023-2031 Housing I am strongly objecting to the proposal to rezone the Paso Nogal area designated for the construction of a large apartment complex. I object for the following reasons:

1. This will drastically increase traffic on this small 2 lane road. The traffic situation will also impact Alhambra Avenue between Highway 4 and Taylor Boulevard and Morello Avenue and Taylor Boulevard. Both Alhambra Avenue and Morello Avenue are severely congested both in the AM and PM with commuters trying to take short cuts to and from Highway 24 and DVC students. All surrounding roads and residents will be affected.

2. This project will destroy a major portion of the green belt area and impact the ecological environment. We have little protected space left. Taking more is not the answer.

3. This project will result in a drastic reduction to home values and quality of life for residents in the are~ The Planning Commission must consider the serious drawbacks to the proposal and not move forward strictly for political and monetary reasons. If this were where you lived would you honestly support such a project?
Sharon Mark
[email protected]
114 Southwind Drive
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2247 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( "':rom:
.;ent:

To:

Subject:

Myra Iqbal <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :40 PM
Planning
Regarding plans for new housing on/near Paso Nogal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom it May Concern,
I am Myra Iqbal, a resident and homeowner of 615 Paso Nogal Road and my family and I have strong objections to any plans for building high density housing units on this road.

Here is our main reason:
1) Our driveway has no access to the pedestrian path across so we have to J-walk at a blindspot to get to the other side and often there are cars driving by at 60 MPH without any regard for the residents and especially children who have homes on Paso Nogal Road. We have a toddler whom we walk to school and back every morning and as it is, we are in constant fear of oncoming traffic. 2) Our barrier has been crashed into by multiple cars and there is already a sizable amount of litter on the road from passing traffic so it will only increase with more vehicle traffic. 3} We don't believe that this road is suited for high vehicle traffic and cannot imagine how much more dangerous it will be for our kids if there are 100+ more vehicles driving by.

We strongly urge you to reconsider this location choice. We are strong supporters of low income housing and our concern is truly for the safety of our children who cross the road and play outside and are at risk of being hit by cars. The fast traffic on this road and blind comer for almost all the homes merging onto the road is already a huge concern without the added threat of more traffic from increased residents.

Thank you for talcing our thoughts into consideration. We hope that you will look into this concern thoroughly.

Kind Regards,
Myra Iqbal, Faaez Ul Haq, and Noora Haq
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2248 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Erin Miller <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :40 PM
Planning
low income high density housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hi - I'm writing to share my opinion on the low income high density housing plan on the city public hearing agenda's this evening. I am all for affordable housing but NOT in either of these two locations. While I don't have a degree in engineering, anyone who knows the area can visually see there isn't much space for this type of thing and it would be like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. I am concerned about the loss of green space along with increased traffic in the area. Additionally, where would the school aged children attend school? The closet elementary school would be Valhalla Elementary. As a parent of a Valhalla elementary school student, I can tell you the classrooms are overcrowded and the school is at capacity.

I implore you to reconsider this plan.

Erin Miller
Skander-Kiki-Odin Pleasant Hill resident
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2249 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( .-om: Juanita Davalos
Sent:

To:

Wednesday, May 3,-2023 1:35 PM
CityCouncilPH
Cc:

Subject:

June Catalano; Janet Coleson; Geoff Gillette; Ethan Bindernagel; Troy Fujimoto FW: Master Planned Paso Nogal Developments - John Sasaki From: Tim Flaherty <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 7:03 AM
To: Janet Coleson <[email protected]>; Juanita Davalos <[email protected]>; June Catalano <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Master Planned Paso Nogal Developments
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

FYI
( ..,.-------- Forwarded message ---------
rom: John Sasaki <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, May 3, 2023 at 1 :00 AM
Subject: Master Planned Paso Nogal Developments
To: <[email protected]>
CC: <[email protected]>
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
*Hey Mayor, I first sent this to Mflaherty for Mayor. Apologies.

Dear Mayor Flaherty, Vice Mayor Rinn, and Councilmembers Noack, Shess, and Vinson, I reach out tonight with warm greetings, and I hope all of you are doing well.

First, a little background. I moved to Pleasant Hill in September 1998, almost 25 years ago, and have loved living in the New Falconpointe development along Paso Nogal ever since. The peaceful setting is what drew me ~re, with its rolling hills and open spaces. We have lots of turkeys, raccoons, skunks, deer, and the occasional coyote. And there's a drainage ditch on the edge of our development that's filled with frogs. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2250 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Up Paso Nogal from my house is the wonderful Paso Nogal Park with its playspaces for dogs, and great hiking trails with their spectacular views. It's an idyllic spot, and one which has always afforded me peace of mind because we always knew it would remain in a more pristine state. But this week, I got the news that the Pleasant Hill Master Plan has something else entirely in store for our neighborhood, and frankly, I am appalled.

I have learned that not only are there plans for one big new apartment complex nearby, but two, one on each side of our development. The one closest to me would be down Paso Nogal towards Alhambra where there is an area of open space. I have heard the plan is for 90-136 apartments to go 1.JP there. On the other side, the plan, as I understand it, would be for the comer of Paso No gal and Morello on the hillside on the northwest comer.

There would be between 174 and 262 apartments going up on that space.

If, in each case, it was even on the low end, so 90 and 174 units, that would bring about a cataclysmic shift for our neighborhood. First off, I would be surprised if there are as many as 100 homes in the developments that currently line Paso Nogal. New Falconpointe has just over 50. So, one apartment complex could more than double the number of homes here, radically change the amount of people in the area, and increase the amount of traffic imme~sely. Paso Nogal is already a busy street that a lot of area residents use as a thoroughfare. Adding hundreds of cars to the area will only serve to clog up our streets, pollute our air and make living here significantly more noisy and challenging. All that would happen if just one of the developments goes in.

And the city thinks that two developments that could collectively quadruple the number of homes here is a good thing? Not to mention that along our street, and in fact, along most of both Alhambra and Morello, there is no high density housing. I am curious why the city wants to make such a radical change to the quality of life for so many longtime, dedicated residents of the Paso N ogal corridor and the surrounding neighborhoods.

Believe me, I know well how much the entire Bay Area needs housing, and affordable housing at that. But our city should not be shouldering the responsibility for housing hundreds (maybe close to 1000?) of new residents on its own, and certainly not in one small area.

I humbly ask each of you to reconsider this plan, because while the complexes would provide transitory housing for people who will come and go in the neighborhood, it will potentially ruin the entire area for people like myself who have planned to spend our golden years in this city that we love so much.

Please feel free to call me with any questions. Thank you for your consideration.

John Sasaki
Strayhorn Road
New Falconpointe
Pleasant Hill
510-406-3729
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2251 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
'=rom:
.;ent:

Ellen Beatty <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :34 PM
To: Planning
Cc: Chris Lunde; Ellen Beatty
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF PLEASANT HILL CITY PL.l\NNING COMMISSION TONIGHT, MAY 3RD, 2023
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Subject: Public Comment - City of Pleasant Hill Planning Commission and Special Meeting of May 3, 2023 Reference: High-Density, Low Income Housing Units - "Paso Nogal Hillside" and "Morello Terraces" Dear City of Pleasant Hill Planning Commission:

My name is Ellen Beatty-Lunde. I reside in the City of Pleasant Hill, specifically at 330 Primrose Drive, and have been a resident there for the past 18 years. My husband, Chris Lunde and I own our home on Primrose Drive, and our home is part of the Wildflower HOA. We learned only a few days ago, and only by chance, of the City of PH's desire to rezone and develop the above referenced sites into high density, low income housing units.

Absent our ability to be at the meeting tonight in person, this email will constitute the contesting by both myselfand my husband, of the City's ''ans to rezone the two vacant sites identified as Paso Noga I Hillside (APN 152-010-004) and Morello Terraces (APN 154-140-015) from R15 and _o single family lots to MRH-Multiple Family, High Density units and zoning. Further, we contest the City's plans to develop approximately 102 units at Paso Noga I Hillside and 196 units at Morello Terraces; a total of 298 units of high density, low incomehousing in these areas.

Our contesting of this rezoning and development is based on numerous factors and concerns. Please find the following:

AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC AND SAFETY CONCERNS:

Increased traffic and congestion along both roadways - Paso Noga I and Morello. Paso Nogal, in particular, is a narrow, two-way road. It does not have the capacity to handle such additional traffic without the potential to cause higher incidents of automobile and pedestrian accidents and safety related issues. Traffic and congestion considerations should be given not only concerning the added housing units, but also the many added service and commercial related vehicles that will be a by-product of new development.

OPEN SPACE, PARKS & WILDLIFE/NATURAL HABITAT CONCERNS:

The Paso Nogal area holds our small Wildflower HOA single family homes, along with other existing HOA's and single family homes on both sides of Paso Nogal. The area holds a highly used dog park, a highly used and beautiful open space "Paso Nogal Park", many public walking trails and paths and is a beautiful and natural resource for the public. The wildlife in these areas is vast, with families of deer, coyotes, squirrels, egrets and turkeys to name a few. Adding new high-density housing to this area and to the Morello area as well, will serve to increase the potential to disturb these habitats, their well-being and frequency to inhabit same. We are accustomed to the existing open space and wildlife that frequents our areas and do not want to see it disturbed by any further development.

WALKING PATHS & TRAILS - PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLING SAFETY:

Walking trails/paths are abundant and highly utilized throughout the open space areas and along the entirety of Paso Noga I Road. We have great concerns that these pathways have the potential to be disturbed, modified or eliminated with the development of new high-density housing in this area.

Cyclists also utilize the existing roadway (and walking path) along Paso Nogal Road. There are currently no dedicated cycling right-ofways along Paso Nogal Road, nor are there any shoulders on the roadway for passing or emergency needs. As a result, safety concerns with existing traffic and congestion are already at issue. Adding increased volumes of traffic and housing will most certainly increase the potential for both automobile and pedestrian/cycling accidents. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2252 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) CRIME:

Crime is a pre-existing concern for all of us who reside in Pleasant Hill (and other areas). The addition of these high-density, low-income housing units will only serve to increase the potential for additional crime in the area.

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE CONCERNS, THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ARE TENDERED FOR THE CITY TO ADDRESS AND ANSWER:

1. When was this rezoning and housing development planned by the City of PH?

2. How and when were the impacted homeowners in these areas notified?

3. How will the increased population and traffic in these areas be address~d by the City of PH?

4. Will any of the walking paths be eliminated or will any of the roadways (Paso Noga I and Morello) be changed or widened?

5. Will the City of PH add traffic signals into these areas?

6. How will the City of PH address pedestrian and cycling safety along these areas?

7. Does the rezoning and development conflict with any of the City of PH's measures for expanding or preserving parks, open spaces, wildlife protection, etc?

8. Has an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or Statement (EIS) been made to assess this potential development?

9. Has a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) been done?

10. Has the City of PH considered alternative sites? And sites that would serve to revitalize and improve existing, deteriorating areas?

11. Has the City of PH considered removal of the Winslow Center on the corner of Taylor Blvd and PH Road and development along the block that currently holds the Winslow Center and the now fallow Mangini farmland adjacent to the Winslow Center?

12. Due to the steep slope angles and lack of level ground (in particular on Paso Nogal), the financial feasibility and viability of these developments is-certainly in question.

It is only because we are out of town and not available to personally attend tonight's Special Public Comment Meeting, that this comment is made electronically in lieu of in person.

Thank you for consideration of our concerns and we will appreciate answers to our questions.

Ellen Beatty-Lunde and Chris Lunde
Contact Information:

Ellen Beatty-Lunde
925-405-2535
Sent from my iPad
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2253 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( "Om:
..>ent:

To:

Subject:
'(bo\?
rfox369 < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :32 PM
Planning
Paso Nogal at Morello Development Proposal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Attention:

Troy Fujimoto I Ethan Bindemagel
Notice:

Traffic and Parking: The proposed additional housing will cause massive congestion and additional pollution in the area. In addition, it is unimaginable where hundreds of new residents ould park. Has anyone considered the risk that we expose our children attending heschools on what's already a busy thoroughfare?
Sink Hole: For decades, the land on Paso Nogal Road and Morello Avenue was not buildable because it sits atop a sink hole. Neighboring residents have not received any information or seen any research conducted by the City regarding the dangers of building on a sink hole.

I am keenly aware of the negative _
impact on property values in our area should this proposal be approved. Real estate agents will have to disclose the development plans to prospective buyers, making Pleasant Hill a far less desirable place to purchase or invest. Notwithstanding losing potential buyers, current property values in the area will likewise fall dramatically, affecting residents city-wide. Some ofus may be inclined to leave the city that we loved and raised our families.

Local Parks: Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nogal Park have always been a destination for local residents seeking peace and quiet. Adding hundreds of residents will negatively impact our local parks.

Public Transit and Local Necessities: The proposed development sites are nowhere near freeways or BART, causing a congested mess for commuters in the area.
~eems sneaky.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2254 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Aggravated,
Bob Fox
603 Aleta Pl
Pleasant Hill, CA
94523
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy sma11phone
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2255 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
(
from:
jent:

Jasmine Simarro <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :20 PM
(
To: Planning
Subject: No housing on paso nogal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I am not in favor of the additional housing on Morello and Paso Noga I. My children go to Valhalla and it is already very impacted with too many students. We do not need more in this small area. We bought out house in this area because of the open space and beautiful hills. We enjoy the feel of living in the country but love that we have amenities close by.

Additional cars, people and housing would impact us negatively.

Please do not allow more housing.

Thank you,
Jasmine simarro
Pleasant hill resident
Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2256 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Maria Berta <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :20 PM
Planning
Subject: Morello/Paso Noga! Development - Submission of Objections - Housing Element and Zoning - Special Planning Commission Meeting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless ou recognize the sender.

As our elected representatives, we entrusted you with our safety, our futures, and our well-being. Adding 396 units, about 700 cars, and 1000 people to a one block area is unsupportable and unjustifiable for numerous reasons. Paso Noga! is as narrow as Gregory Gardens streets. There are altercations, near-misses and traffic jams already on the comer of Paso Nogal and Morello.

I understand that the state is mandating more high density housing and you are under pressure to comply, but let's choose a location near basic services, shops and transportation! This development will be land-locked and the existing infrastructure can't support it. This is possibly the worst choice for a development in Pleasant Hill! HUD has been very specific and cle~ that high density housing belongs near transit centers:
https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr-edge-trending-051722.html Let's build smarter. There are excellent choices in the city limits that serve to Please represent the interests of your constituents and deny this development for the following reasons:
•
• There is zero public transportation nearby. The site isn't near BART or even a bus stop. The two freeways are all via residential areas, so all of these new residents would congest all of the surrounding areas with cars that will add to the existing traffic problem. • Paso Nogal doesn't even have a sidewalk. There is no bike lane to Safeway. These houses will be landlocked with no way to get to services but to drive down a dark, narrow 2 lane street. It is already too narrow. When I try to bike on Paso Nogal I have to risk my life with the cars, as there's not even a shoulder, or ride on the path. This road can't support more traffic or even pedestrians. • The 1800 block of Morello has no sidewalk for 1/2 of the distance and kids constantly walk in the street to avoid mud, weeds, thorns and dirt. This is a hazard and very dangerous. I've requested the city and parks install a walkway for years to deaf years. How can you justify adding 1000 more residents to an area where you can't even keep existing residents safe? • There is only one road in/out of Paso Nogal and that is an extreme safety hazard. The fire department has already deemed Paso Nogal unsafe to develop for this very reason. There is no space to expand.

How can you jeopardize safety by placing 100 people in a safety services-inaccessible area? • The schools are already overcrowded. They can't take more students. Valhalla, Valley View and College Park are all at capacity. Would extra schools be built? • The existing schools are not walkable from Morello/Paso Nogal. This would put all of these cars dropping kids off in a 3 block radius all at the same time in the morning and afternoon. Viking, Norse, Paso Nogal, Kiki, Odin, and even the streets into the YMCA and Police Department are all gridlocked as is for about 40 mins each morning and afternoon. No additional traffic·can be supported. • We have an abundance of wildlife on those hills along with wonderful native wildflowers and other flora. All of this will be toml out and the animals will die. • As a biker, walker, and jogger, I have been almost hit by cars several times crossing streets on Morelle.

There was a pedestrian hit on Morello a few years back. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2257 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) • There are safer sites, near services and shopping, and convenient for transportation and walking. That is the smart choice for the city, existing residents, and much more desirable for high density, as the new residents need to have safe, ready access to services.
( • These areas are zoned green areas. They have been protected for decades. By taking down trees and plants, you increase the heat island effect, thereby increasing the ambient temperature and exacerbating climate change. This is not what we need for our future and will only serve to erode it. • Living on the comer of Morello and Paso No gal, we have been nearly rear-ended by cars speeding through the stop sign on the comer. We have requested a driveway on Paso Nogal which would be more visible and safer, but we have been denied due to the set back and green space requirements. Why was our safety not a concern? But now all of the ordinances and zoning can be ignored and overturned? • Building on a hillside with clay soil? The added expense of this development will be astronomical. The hillside can't support these units without major and expensive work. The soil expands and contracts with moisture and existing homes have known settling, expansion, cracking and moisture problems. This geologic site cannot support development.
• The local park: Hidden Lakes, is congested on weekends with cars parked on walkways and easements, down the adjacent streets and along side roads. It can't support 400 more families. • The JCPenny site is an ideal location. Flat, near bus lines and the freeway, walking to many shops, restaurants and grocery stores, already on a 4 lane maior roadway with stoplights and dedicated turn lanes and signals. It could be beautiful with trees, landscaping, setbacks and sound walls.

What about the Beatrice/Cleveland lot? The former Black Angus? The lots by CarMax/DVC? The former Orchard Supply Hardware? All of these are close to services, shops, grocery stores, buslines, thoroughfares, and the freeway ... and they're graded/level and ready to go! Sincerely,
faria Berta
1809 Morello Ave.
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2258 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:
john rodgersranchurbanfarm.org <[email protected] > Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1:11 PM
Planning
Troy Fujimoto
comment on rezoning of R 18 and R20
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Objection to rezonir:1g parcels R18 and R20 to accommodate high density housing as part of the RHNA compliance.

R18 (Paso Nogal} is a very narrow street. Adding approximately 100 additional homes on that site will make traffic much worse.

R20 (Morello} is a less dense site, but if developed at the same time as R18, it puts a huge additional load on the area for traffic.

Pleasant Hill schools are not equipped for this many additional students.

Traffic is already a problem. People speed and ignore stop signs, especially at Paso Nagai/Morello intersection.

John Matthesen
710 Kenton Ct.

Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
510-612-7979
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2259 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ·om:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Pleasant Hill 2040 <[email protected]> Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :09 PM
[email protected]; [email protected]; Troy Fujimoto [#20230503200906] Comment from Pleasant Hill 2040 Website Housing Element CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Ticket: [#20230503200906]
Name: John Matthesen
E-mail Address: [email protected]
Comments:

I object to the proposed rezoning of R18 / Paso Noga! because it will introduce too much traffic on that narrow street.

I object to the propose rezoning of R20 / Morello because if added to the Paso Nogal site, it will put too much traffic in the neighborhood.

Page title: Housing Element
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2260 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

[email protected]
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1 :03 PM
Planning
[email protected]; [email protected]
Objection to proposed apartment development near Morello/Paso Nogal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern regarding the recently revealed plans for an apartment development in Pleasant Hill near Paso Nogal and Morello.

As a resident of Aleta Place, I am deeply troubled to hear that The City of Pleasant Hill is planning a massive new apartment complex development of up to 400 units near my home. The city has provided absolutely no appropriate notice or signage notifying neighboring residents of their plans or upcoming meetings as they have done in the past regarding substantial proposed changes to our city. As a matter of fact, we had to learn of the city's proposal via neighborhood Next Door and Facebook posts on social media less than 48 hours before the City's proposed meeting on May 4, 2023. This is entirely unacceptable and inappropriate while giving rise to a p"resumption that the city is putting its own fiscal interest (and those of developers) above the devoted constituents who reside and own homes near the proposed site. The permanent negative impacts on the neighboring community will be felt for decades to come. Our desire to live in a peaceful, safe, and beautiful environment should be of the highest priority to our elected members and city officials. Sneaking in and rushing through such a proposal with no true opportunity for community feedback is wholly unacceptable. While we understand that there is a need for affordable housing not just in our city but also the surround areas, this is not even remotely close to being an appropriate site for such a developr:nent.

This proposed development will wreak havoc on this small neighborhood within our beloved city by creating several problems not just for existing residents but also any new potential residents including those that would reside in the proposed apartments. These include:

Traffic and Parking: The proposed additional housing will cause severe congestion and additional pollution in the area.

The area consists of only one- and two-lane roads and the site only has the one lane road in each direction with no traffic mitigation. There is no lighting on the roads around the area which only worsen this problem. In addition, it is unimaginable where hundreds of new residents would park.

Sink hole and unstable land: For decades, the land on Paso Nogal Road and Morello Avenue was not buildable because it sits atop a sink hole. Neighboring residents have not received any information or seen any research conducted by the city regarding the dangers of building on a sink hole. If there is a large-scale development built on the site the risk to the new building and existing nearby building of structural damage and increased maintenance and oversight is substantial.

Property Values: A large scale apartment complex or multiple for that matter would quickly drive down property values as it would make the area less desirable to potential buyers of property in the area and the city as a whole. This will drive down city revenues as well with fewer buyers creating demand in the area.

Local Parks: Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nogal Park have always been a destination for local residents seeking peace and quiet. Adding hundreds of residents will negatively impact our local parks by creating noise and over crowding as well as creating safety issues to the nearby residents.

Public Transit and Local infrastructure: The proposed development sites are nowhere near any main infrastructure 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2261 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) including busses, freeways or the BART system which would cause huge potential traffic jams. This not only creates an inconvenience to existing residents in the area but also is a disservice to potential residents of the proposed development. Also, there is only one main shopping center providing grocery (Safeway) nearby. Other than that, there ·e no amenities in the nearby area which makes no sense when comparing building a development of this size near a main area of a city with all required food and services nearby and within a walking area.

Area of natural beauty: This development would ruin the site of a natural park and substantially harm the look and feel of the surrounding area while also harming the overall culture and appearance of the surrounding area.

Overall safety: The area around and in the park near Paso Nogal already has issues involving people seeking the area out because of the secluded manner to take part in nefarious activities including theft and drug use. The road -is littered with drug paraphernalia including spent nitrous cartridges and other materials. The park and surround area back up to numerous homes with no real·protection other than small fences and natural hedges. Adding this many new residents with no ownership interest or desire to better the area with a substantial personal investment would only drive-up potential crime and increase safety and privacy concerns of the nearby families.

If you move forward with this proposal, you will undoubtedly unleash a collective distrust within the city of Pleasant Hill and risk not only damaging the town image and culture but also the future of the town and the officials we elect to represent us and our interests. I truly hope you put substantial weight to the opinions and concerns of this and all the other local resident and homeowners who have made heavy investments into our town.

Sincerely,
Andy Azadnia
Product Manager
1all Business Credit Card
•✓ells Fargo Bank, N.A.
[email protected]
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. 2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2262 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Name: Don Smallen
Born: Richmond Ca 1942
209 Netherby Place PH CA
559 284 8679 Mobile
[email protected]
PLi\i\ ; '. '. : IQ 0:\/ISlON
CITY Of PLEASANT HILL
Being a local resident for 80 years, I am witness to the degradation of this state to which, has become a "national joke"

CASE IN POINT
The City of Pleasant Hill planning commission has been provided with a plethora Of comments from local residenc~ (as requested) festooned with numerous objections as to why "Low Income Housing" is not conducive to the residence's, local businesses, and the elimination of and to what open spaces we have left at the subje~ locations.

Have we reached a turning point to the extent local government has become subservient to the HCD where state government has the power over ride the · will of the electorate?
GOOGLE tyrannical

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2263 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) 5/3/23, 10:38 AM Mail - Eva Sonnenberg - Outlook
Morello or Paso Nogal proposed housing development.

Eva Sonnenberg <[email protected]>
Tue 5/2/2023 1 :00 PM
To: [email protected] · <[email protected]> _PLArJNING DIVISION
Cl fY OF PLEASANT Hill
As a long time Ridgeview resident, I am very concerned about the plans to develop the above mentioned open spaces. My neighbors and I are very concerned about the increase in already congested traffic, long lines at local businesses, and the impact on wild,life ... please consider taking into · · consideration another site which is not nestled into such an established Senior/ child friendly established community.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my very serious concerns, Eva Sonnenberg
238 Fernwood
PH
Sent from my iPhone
, ·:
https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/sentitems/id/AQMkADAwATEwYmM3LTU4NmUtZWRjNC0wMAltMDAKAEYMAP%2FRPGzCGsMT7r%2FuYwul301Bw... 1/1

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2264 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

JQ..WZ.,+
jlm <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:54 PM
Planning
Subject: Proposal for High-Density/Low-Income Housing on Paso Nogal Rd and Morello Ave CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

This message is for public correspondence at the planning commission meeting on MAY 3, 2023
To the City of Pleasant Hill Planning Commission:

As a resident of Pleasant Hill, I am writing to express my outrage that I was not given proper notification about the 250-300 high-density/low-income housing units that are proposed for the Paso Nagai Road and Morello Avenue area! It was only through word-of-mouth "and neighborhood emails that I learned about this proposal.

I believe strongly that the Paso Nagai / Morello Ave area is totally inappropriate for such an enormous development!
• Traffic is already extremely heavy on Morello and the additional cars would create significant congestion, reduce safety and make peak commute times impossible!
• Paso Nagai is a dangerous country road with curves and hills. Even today, after coming to a complete stop and checking for traffic, my car was almost hit by a speeding car coming around a bend on Paso Nagai. Additional traffic would greatly impact the safety of pedestrians using the dog park, access in and out of neighborhoods and create more havoc for the wild life.
• The proposed area is not close to amenities (grocery stores, schools, public transportation [buses and BART]). This will make owning a car ( or two) a necessity. I believe that a different location, one which 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2265 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) r ·
supports the fundamental living needs of this new community, would clearly be a more logical and supportive choice.

The consideration of a location within walking distance to BART, should be a high priority.

I currently live in the highly dense neighborhood of Ridgeview Court and my street is already overwhelmed with cars. Adding more vehicles to the already heavily traveled street on Morello will make life here more unpleasant and traffic more dangerousl
Thank you for taking my concerns seriously.

Janet Mason
512 Ridgeview Court
Pleasant hill
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2266 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Arusha Patel <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 20.23 12:49 PM
Troy Fujimoto; Planning
Objection - to the proposal to re-zone the Morello Terrace and re-zoning to a vacant site on Paso Noga!.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: Pleasant Hill Planning Committee:

I am objecting to the proposal to re-zone the Morello Terrace (open nature space at corner of Morello and Netherby hillside) to accommodate a four story apartment complex to contain 196 dwelling units (apartments); and/or proposal including plans for the identical re-zoning to a vacant site on Paso Noga!.

The Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan provides no rationale for the selection of the Morello Terraces over other available lots, nor are there any insight to the "Planning Teams" consideration of alternative lots/strategies, any analysis of impact to the surrounding environment, or adherence to surrounding community input. The Planning Commission's complete neglect of input from the surrounding communities - as well as the non-existent consideration of alternative
strategies or analysis of impact - forces me to objected loudly! I object for the following reasons:

Drastic increase in traffic flux: It is reasonable to assume most tenants would have an additional car, which the complex would not accommodate, resulting in drastic overspill of vehicle parking into neighboring streets such as Douglas Terrace, St Germain Place, Netherby Street, Netherby Place, Janin Place, Fairway Place, Morello Avenue, Ridgeview Drive, Ridgeview Place. This lot is not a transit rich area per Senate Bill 10; therefore, ++++++-it is reasonable to assume cars would be the residents primary form of transportation.

Complete degradation of the environment/wildlife habitat (the entire hillside will be excavated): This hillside is an important corridor for local coyote, opossum, raccoon, deer, turkey, and ground squirrel populations to migrate between Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nagai Park. Without the ability to traverse this plot, roadkill events will continue to increase and further decimate our local wildlife population. The excavation of this hillside will also transform a mild/moderate natural gradient slope to a vertical gradient to accommodate a four-story, multi building complex, which would require thousands of gallons of diesel fuel needed to grade the slopes.

This destruction of open-space land is seemingly at odds with the guidance set forth in Government Code 65400; " ... practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plan, so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources ... " 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2267 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Severe disruption of the surrounding housing privacy/uniformity: The proposed four-story apartment complex would be completely singular in its density, architecture, and land usage compared to the surrounding area. The resulting increase in population density would negate the intended surrounding building edges, transition, context, and privacy.

My Assessment.

The selection of Morello Terraces (and Paso Nogal) maximally benefits the "Planning Committee's" future claim of political achievements and the Corporate Builders density tax credits, while completely neglecting the impact to the surrounding area and constituents. When the decision points to benefiting the "Planning Committee" and builders without any engagement of the surrounding community, I strongly object! Thank you
Arusha Patel
423 Ridgeview Dr
Pleasant Hill CA 94523
[email protected]
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2268 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:
-----Original Message-----
Juanita Davalos
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 12:24 PM
CityCouncilPH
June Catalano; Ethan Bindernagel; Troy Fujimoto
FW: Morello Terraces
From: Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 9:11 AM
To: Planning <[email protected]>; City Council <[email protected]> Cc: Girl Friend <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Troy Jones <[email protected]>; Steve Houghton <[email protected]>
Subject: Morello Terraces
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Planning commission and City Council,
I'm reaching out because I am aware of the Morello Terraces high density housing proposal that is under consideration.

In my 28 years of being a homeowner in Pleasant Hill and raising children, coaching and being active in the community have seen enormous growth and the changes in our community that have occurred. I have never spoke out and I am not against change, just changes that are going to be counterproductive to the quality of life where I live.

I as well as many of my neighbors believe it is time to pause large new high density housing tracts throughout all of PH and let the already brand new tracts (not occupied or completed construction) settle in for at least 10 years and guage what is in the best interest and quality of life of the homeowners, families and residents of this bedroom Bay Area community. This is what responsible growth should look like.

It's time to put the community quality of life ahead of more density and tax dollars.

Respectfully,
Randy Ba risof
2845 Madeira Way
Pleasant Hill, Ca
94523
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2269 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
(I ~,om:
..-ent:

To:

Subject:

Greg Thompson <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 4:08 PM
Planning
Proposed development on Paso Nogal and/or Morello
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

We are strongly opposed to this development. Too far from freeways and public transportation. Appears to be in violation of your own agenda 21/sustainable growth plans.

We just found out about this today.

We are going to organize community resistance.

Thank you for your consideration.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2270 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ,:rom:
:ient:

To:

Subject:
[email protected]
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:59 PM
Planning
Low Income High Density Housing (Paso Noga!)
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom It May Concern:

I am a home owner in the area for nearly 19 years and I strongly object to what the City of Pleasant Hill is currently considering adding to the relatively quiet, single family home neighborhood, my husband and I choose to buy and live, in our later years. Not only would the addition of so many units change the feel of our neighborhood, but it would add so many more cars and traffic congestion to an area that is already impacted due to the four schools in the immediate area! I also work at Valhalla and I can not imagine how the elementary school would be impacted! As it is, Valhalla classes are at capacity, so with the addition of countless more children being added to the district, where would they go? How is it going to affect the families and the education of their children, who bought very expensive houses and pay astronomical Property Taxes to be able to attend Valhalla Elementary? Schools can not take on an infinite amount of students! Has anyone even done a study on the impact it would have on the schools, let alone the impact on our resources (water, waste, utilities, etc.)? Not to mention in the recent years, the rolling black outs and wildfire danger to our community! Thank goodness for NextDoor; otherwise, I would not even have heard about this meeting until it hal. already taken place! You really should have a better system of informing your homeowners of Pleasant Hill!
Kindly,
Kathleen Myers
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2271 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
r~rom:
,;ent:

To:

Subject:

Atefeh Paktinat <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:58 PM
Planning
Fwd: Letter of Opposition
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Serianna Jenab <serianna. [email protected]>
Date: Wed, May 3, 2023 at 3:16 PM
Subject: Letter of Opposition
To: <[email protected]>
Please email the following to [email protected] by 4PM today:

I OPPOSE the proposed rezoning and/or building of any apartment developments at Paso Nogal Road/Morello A venue and along Paso No gal Road between Morello A venue and Alhambra Road. ~◄ Otice: The City has provided no notice to neighboring residents. In fact, we had to learn of the City's proposal through our neighborhood NextDoor.compostings less than 48 hours before the City's proposed meeting on May 4, 2023. This is entirely unacceptable and gives rise to a presumption that the City is putting its own fiscal interest ( and those of developers) above the devoted cqnstituents who reside here. The impact on the neighboring community will be felt for decades and our desire to live in a peaceful, safe environment should be of utmost importance to our elected members.

Traffic and Parking: The proposed additional housing will cause massive congestion and additional pollution in the area. In addition, it is unimaginable where hundreds of new residents would park.

Sink Hole: For decades, the land on Paso Nogal Road and Morello Avenue was not buildable because it sits atop a sink hole. Neighboring residents have not received any information or seen any research conducted by the City regarding the dangers of building on a sink hole.

Property Values: Property values in our area will be negatively impacted should this proposal be approved. Real estate agents will have to disclose the development plans to prospective buyers, making Pleasant Hill a far less desirable place to purchase or invest. Notwithstanding losing potential buyers, current property values in the area will likewise fall dramatically, affecting residents city-wide . .., 0cal Parks: Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nogal Park have always been a .,stination for local residents seeking peace and quiet. Adding hundreds of residents will negatively impact our local parks. -
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2272 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Public Transit and Local Necessities: The proposed development sites are nowhere near freeways or BART, causing a congested mess for ( ~ ~ommuters in the area.

Sincerely,
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2273 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conn~r
'.,.om:

Jent:

To:

Subject:

Linda Y <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:57 PM
Planning
Planning Process for "Low Income High Density Housing"
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I'm very much against building high-density housing on the vacant lot at the comer of Morello and Netherby Pl and the lot on Paso Nogel. Our city is crowded enough as it is! Quality of life has diminished significantly since I moved to Pleasant Hill in 1989. I feel that it is mostly due to the continued building being allowed by the city.

Our roads are clogged and some in horrible condition, our power grid is constantly failing, every year we wonder if we will have enough water to see us through, and yet we keep building. · I know there is a mandate from the state to provide housing, but please find a better solution.

Linda
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2274 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ---1:rom:
.;ent:

To:

Subject:

Importance:
nelig <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:54 PM
Planning
Low Income High Density Project--disagreement
High
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hello City of Pleasant Hill Planning,
I saw your 'URGENT NOTICE' regarding your planning process for xLow Income High Desnsityx housing to be built near my residence, on Foothill Place, off of Passo Nogal.

I am very CONCERNED, unhappy and in STROG DISAGREEMENT, and am AGAINST this project, for the following reasons:

LBy adding about400 units, that is also adding AT LEAST 800 cars and at least 1000 or more like 3000 people ( children included), in this very tight area, will be damaging to the community, due to creating more horrible.trafic.
". Parking for at least 1000 to 2000 more cars will be hazardous. Parking is already very difficult in the area, considering that each residence currently has 3-4-5 cars, for_ two parents and at least 2-3 driving children.

3. Adding buildings, people and cars, will endanger the safety of natural wild life through this area. We are currently enjoying the presence of deer with their babies, foxes, birds, and a diversity or wildlife. Often we see deer hit by cars on the side of the road, already. By adding so many more cars, the wildlife will be extinct.

4. My view will be obstructed by apartment buildings, thus bringing my property value down a lot. All my windows are facing the beautiful green hill on the right side ofMorrello Ave, and Passo Nogal. I specifically chose this house, for the beautiful natural views, and I am against this project, who will force me to look up at the buildings instead of nature.

5. Passo Nogal is a very norow street, and by adding buildings along it and cars, will increase the accident probability.

6. Adding so many more people will decrease the safety of our neighborhood. There are so many complaints and youtube videos with neighborhoods close to Pleasant Hill, where bad people break in, or steal packages from the front porch. I feel unsafe in my own house, to have 2-3000 more people across the street from my home.

Please take into consideration and listen to the voice of the residents of this city, particularly the residents of Morrello and Passo Nogal, where you intend to build so many appartments. fhank you so much, I appreciate you listening to us.

Kind regards,
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2275 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) A very concerned citizen,
Cornelia
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2276 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
~,om:
5ent:

To:

Subject:

Kim O'Neil < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:50 PM
Planning
Stop the low income housing planning.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I oppose the low income housing plan in Pleasant Hill.

Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2277 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ,, ...--"':'rom:
.... ent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Sharon Morris <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:47 PM
Planning
Daniel Morris
Opposed to two planned Housing developments: Morello Terraces & Paso Nogal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: Planning Department of Pleasant Hill,
My husband Dan and I are opposed to these two planned developments.

It was brought to my attention only yesterday, May 2, 2023, that these two new housing development projects (Low Income High Density) are in the planning process, and that a special planning commission meeting is being held tonight. We are unsure if they are truly Low Income. I live on Morello Ave. in the nearby neighborhood area that is proposed to be affected. I am concerned that there was no public outreach to our community to involve us in the planning process. We never would have known about it.

These projects are evidently being projected to have as many as 396 units cumulatively, and an hundreds of cars.
• Morello Terraces ( 6.55 acres) possibly 262 units at maximum capacity •"Paso Nogal" (3.4 acres) possibly 136 units at maximum capacity (on Paso Nogal Road) My reasons for opposing these two developments: Morello Terraces & Paso Nogal I) Not in Neighborhood Character. Property values diminished: These are not in character with the neighborhood, and do not fit. This area is a quiet mostly single family home neighborhood. The neighborhood also has long established townhome developments which are owned units. We think our property values will be diminished with these high density, low income developments. 2) Increased Traffic and Speed: We already contend with speeding cars on Morello. About two weeks ago there was an accident in which a car crashed into a light pole on Morello Ave., plowing through a home's front yard. A large power outage ensued that lasted over 24 hours. We already need more speed controls on the A venue. These projects would add hundreds of cars, especially during commute and school drop off times. The safety of our school children crossing Morello would be in jeopardy. 3) Infrastructure: With the addition of these two housing developments the infrastructure will be more stretched. Stonnwater management: Will stonnwater be managed to stay on the property? These are hillside sites. The Stonndrains already are overloaded, and our gutters in the winter flow a foot deep and the drains are clogged. Neighbors take it upon themselves to clean the storm drains! Erosion will be a huge problem to solve on these steep hillsides. The geology of the sites will be endangered. What about Power, PG&E etc. -ri-ie Roads. Paso Nogal Road is a narrow, winding road that cannot be widened at either end at intersections. It not graded and constructed to accommodate and manage this many more vehicles. Especially at high traffic times. There would need to be a new traffic signal at Morello Ave. and Paso Nogal Road. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2278 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) 4) Location next to Paso Noga) Park & open spac~. These projects are located almost next to the Paso Nogal Park which is full of wildlife including owls. It is used extensively as a safe park for the neighborhood, for ( -=~···valking and physical fitness, communal areas, and a dog park. Adding use by hundreds of new residents without much of a stake in the neighborhood will cause extensive additional wear and tear on the park, its patl dog park, wildlife and environment. With hundreds of additional people using the park could change it from a safe park to one that would require a paid ranger, security, and much more expense and maintenance. Even now there are hardly any trash cans, the paths are eroded from the extreme winter, and the grass requires mowing for protection during fire season.
5) Environmental Impact Statement/ CEQA?: Was an Environmental Impact Statement required, or CEQA for these Projects? If not or if this was bypassed this needs to be discussed with the community and clarified why it was exempt.
6) Safety: This is a safe, quiet neighborhood and we want to maintain that. We all want to be able to safely walk in our neighborhoods. With this many more residents our neighborhood would need more police presence and patrols.

I will be attending the community meeting in person or via Meeting link.

Thank you for considering our opinions as involved voters.

Sincerely,
Sharon and Dan Morris
'W33 Morello Ave .
.. 'leasant Hill, CA
Sharon Morris
415-987-4517
Confidential email. If you have received this email by mistake please kindly let me know. Thank you! 2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2279 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
-,om:
.,ent:

To:

Subject:

JP <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:45 PM
Planning
Proposal for high density housing on Paso Nogal and Morello hillsides CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To: the City of Pleasant Hill Planning Commission:

I live in the Pleasant Hill Wildflower HOA community off Paso Nogal Road. The Wildflower HOA resides next to the 'Paso Nogal Hill' site where the State and the City of Pleasant Hill Planning Commission currently propose building a massive high-density/lowincome structure. As I understand the current status of this proposal, the State will allow removal of any obstacle, be it financial- or code-related, that currently would stop this high-density project from moving forward. · The physical nature of the site at 'Paso Nogal Hill' is inappropriate to the proposed structure due the shape and steep slope of the property. A great deal of money will be required to mold this property to accommodate the proposed building structure. Not just the Paso Nogal Hill site but the entire length of the Paso Nogal Road from Alhambra to Morello will need massive upgrading. ·· What will be accomplished by meeting the State's mandate? The degradation of the Paso Nogal neighborhood by a huge 'while elephant' structure will dominate Paso Nogal Road and the surrounding neighborhoods.

How will these building proposals impact the area's property values? I find it hard to believe that every household in the Paso Noga] area will not see a negative impact on the resale value of their homes. ( lere are many other sites within Pleasant Hill more suitable for high-density, low-income housing than the property at Paso Nogal ...iill and the property at the comer of Paso Nogal and Morello. I understand and appreciate the need to provide additional housing throughout the State. I also understand the role each California city plays in this process. However, I do not believe the Paso Nogal Hill site and the neighboring site at the corner of Paso No gal and Morello are in any way suitable for this purpose.

It's the State's mandate to push Cities to accept the highest possible housing number count. It is the City's mandate to push back on these efforts with all possible vigor to protect its citizens and neighborhoods. At this late date I hope that you, the Pleasant Hill Planning Commission, have not given up this fight. -
Sincerely,
John Piva
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
PS This correspondence is for public comment at the Commission meeting. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2280 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
1 - -=,om:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Tabatha Utley <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:42 PM
Planning
Planning Commission Special Meeting: 5/3/23 at 6pm: RESIDENT FEEDBACK CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Good afternoon,
As a resident of Pleasant Hill and a resident near the areas proposed for the development of high density housing, I object to the aforementioned proposal.

I already live near high density housing and am dealing with the issues that stem from that arrangement, which include but are not limited to:

1. Increased traffic and traffic noise

2. Reckless driving

3. Higher traffic through what was once a quiet neighborhood I purchased my home with because of how the surrounding neighborhood was like, the open spaces conducive to a better quality of life and mental health. If I wanted to live in a city like environment; I would have bought a ( 1ome closer to a downtown like location. I'm concerned that an influx of a large number of people in a condensed area will further exacerbate the issues I've mentioned and will cause a strain on city resources. The· roads in the surrounding area are already run down as it is. Not to mention the likely hood of higher crime rates as there was already a shooting last near in one of the apartment complexes.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Tabatha Utley
Get Outlook for iOS
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2281 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
~,om:
.-ent:

To:

Subject:

Ben Kahl <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:37 PM
Planning
Letter of Opposition
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I OPPOSE the proposed rezoning and/or building of any apartment developments at Paso Nogal Road/Morello Avenue and along Paso Noga I Road between Morello Avenue and Alhambra Road for the following reasons:

Notice: The City has provided no notice to n~ighboring residents. In fact, we had to learn of the City's proposal through our neighborhood NextDoor.com postings less than 48 hours before the City's proposed meeting on May 4, 2023. This is entirely unacceptable and gives rise to a presumption that the City is putting its own fiscal interest (and those of developers) above the devoted constituents who reside here. The impact on the neighboring community will be felt for decades and our desire to live in a peaceful, safe environment should be of utmost importance to our elected members.

Traffic and Parking: The proposed additional housing will cause massive congestion and additional pollution in the area. In addition, it is unimaginable where hundreds of new residents would park.
(~ink Hole and Safety: For decades, the land on Paso Nogal Road and Morello Avenue was .>t buildable because it sits atop a sink hole. Neighboring residents have not received any information or seen any research conducted by the City regarding the dangers of building on a sink hole and/or regarding the safety of building any proposed housing.

Local Parks: Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nogal Park have always been a destination for local residents seeking peace and quiet. Adding hundreds of residents will negatively impact our local parks.

Public Transit and Local Necessities: The proposed development sites are nowhere near freeways or BART, causing a congested mess for commuters in the area.

Sincerely,
Justin Kahl
Pleasant Hill Resident
.mt from Mail for Windows
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2282 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
.,-· 'Crom:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Soraya M <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:33 PM
Planning
Reg. Low housing Income Project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern,
I am totally against this idea. I want to stress my concerns, going through with this project will definitely impact the property value of this neighborhood. It will also bring unnecessary traffic to this area which is not safe for my kid. As it is we already have major issues with incoming traffic & cars speeding through this area. Such an important decision cannot be made based on just one hearing. Every neighbor should be given the chance to voice their opinions regarding this important matter. My family & I are 100% opposed to this idea.

Thanks
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2283 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
(/ -'.rom:
,ent:

To:

Subject:
bijan mizani <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:31 PM
Planning
low income housing project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hi,
I have lived in Pleasant hill for almost 4 years now and I just received a call regarding this matter from a close friend and since it is a last minute, I thought that i have to send this email since the matter is very important to me and my family. I am very surprised that we did not get any mails regarding this issue and no notices from the city hall. If i didn't get the call from my friend, I wouldn't of know about this.

We are opposing this project because it will change the quality of our life, Security of our neighborhood, the traffic and parking. It will certainly effect our property values as well. Most of houses in our area are well over a million dollars and bringing such a project so close to our area it will effect us all.

We are not interested in seeing such a housing in our area.

Thanks
Fatemeh Sohrabi Azad
619 Paso Nogal rd.

Pleasant Hill, CA
925-518-4696
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2284 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r ·,:rom:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Kristina B Flanagan < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:28 PM
Planning
Krissy Flanagan
PUBIC HEARING: 5/3/2023- RE: Paso Nogal rd and morello ave planning for massive amts of additional housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To:

Pleasant Hill Housing Planning team
I have major concerns about the potential for large amount of housing for this area mentioned above. As a Pleasant Hill resident, I object to this new housing development and would ask to stop this planning and save the area for environmental support of the community.

Kristina flanagan
1457 Fieldcrest Circle
Pleasant Hill, CA
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing :s contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. v.173.295 Thank you. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2285 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r ~~,om:
...,ent:

To:

Subject:

Andre# <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:27 PM
Planning
Planning Commission Special Meeting: 5/3/23 at 6pm: RESIDENT FEEDBACK CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Good afternoon,
As a resident of Pleasant Hill and a resident near the areas proposed for the development of high density housing, I object to the aforementioned proposal.

I already live near high density housing and am dealing with the issues that stem from that arrangement, which include but are not limited to:

1. Increased traffic and traffic noise

2. Reckless driving

3. Higher traffic through what was once a quiet neighborhood I purchased my home with because of how the surrounding neighborhood was like, the open spaces conducive to a better quality of life and mental health. If I wanted to live in a city like environment; I would have bought a home closer to a downtown like location. I'm concerned that an influx of a large number of people in a ( )ndensed area will further exacerbate the issues I've mentioned and will cause a strain on city resources. The 1oads in the surrounding area are already run down as it is. Not to mention the likely hood of higher crime rates as there was already a shooting last near in one of the apartment complexes.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Andrey Gavrilchik.

Sent from Gmail Mobile
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2286 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
":rom:
5ent:

To:

Alison King <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:26 PM
Planning
Subject: Letter of Opposition
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I OPPOSE the proposed rezoning and/or building of any apartment developments at Paso Nogal Road/Morello Avenue and along Paso Noga! Road between Morello Avenue and Alhambra Road for the following reasons:

Notice: The City has provided no notice to neighboring residents. In fact, we had to learn of the City's proposal through our neighborhood NextDoor.compostings less than 48 hours before the City's proposed meeting on May 4, 2023. This is entirely unacceptable and gives rise to a presumption that the City is putting its own fiscal interest ( and those of developers) above the devoted constituents who reside here. The impact on the neighboring community will be felt for decades and our desire to. live in a peaceful, safe environment should be of utmost importance to our elected members.

Traffic and Parking: The proposed additional housing will cause massive congestion and additional pollution in the area. In addition, it is unimaginable where hundreds of new residents would park.

Sink Hole and Safety: For decades, the land on Paso Nogal Road and Morello Avenue was not buildable because it sits atop a sink hole. Neighboring residents have not received any information or seen any research conducted by the City regarding the dangers of building on a sink hole and/or regarding the safety of building any proposed housing.

Local Parks: Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Noga! Park have always been a destination for local residents seeking peace and quiet. Adding hundreds of residents will negatively impact our local parks.

Public Transit and Local Necessities: The proposed development sites are nowhere near freeways or BART, causing a congested mess for commuters in the area.

Sincerely,
( Alison King
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2287 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
1 - ~rom:
...,ent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Larry Barlettani <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:26 PM
Troy Fujimoto
Document - May 2, 2023
Doc - May 2, 2023 - 10-08 AM.pdf; ATT00001.txt
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Scanned with TurboScan.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2288 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r- -~rom:

Sent:

To:

Subject:
jill rapier <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:24 PM
Planning
Public Comment RE rezoning of Morello Terrance and Paso Nogal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Commissioners,
I have been a Pleasant Hill resident for 30 years. My children are 20 and 24 years old and have lived here all their lives," other than college. I worry about their ability to remain in California given housing affordability issues, so I am in favor of realistic development of low and moderate income housing.

I live on the hill opposite the proposed Paso Nagai site. This housing development, specifically my street Kawai Lane, was originally planned to be larger with a full two-lane road and more housing on the hill through to the other half of the development on Shetland Drive. My understanding is that as sitework commenced in the early 1980's the planned development had to be changed significantly due to the instability of the hill. The road to the other side of the development is now one lane for emergency vehicles only and none of the planned houses were built on the hill. The water main under my street and the emergency vehicle access to the other side of the development is owned by Martinez and has had three breaks in the last decade due to hill movement.

As noted in the plan, the hill across Paso Nagai and the hill at Morello Terraces will likely have similar issues and if { jevelopment is to be seriously considered by a developer will require significant subsidies/concessions by the city of Pleasant Hill. If the state planners are paying attention, I don't believe these sites will be seen as reasonable solutions to the JCPenney site they rejected. These sites are unbuildable without unreasonable cost to Pleasant Hill for huge retaining walls and significant soils engineering and we do not have a large tax base to fund that work and potential lawsuits if residences above these sites are compromised. These hills will require a lot more than "grading" If the State is not paying attention, we are kicking the can down the road. One of my son's best teachers at College Park was taking the bus to BART to his apartment in a more affordable area, I want him to be able to live here. This "solution" is just not realistic as the sites are clearly unbuildable at reasonable cost.

Would a better response be to challenge the low resource categorization of the JCPenney site? I am not a city planner and do not fully understand the designations or appeal process, but I don't understand why a site with better access to public transportation, right next to a large grocery store as well as a community college and more potential jobs and job training is considered low resources. It will be less expensive for Pleasant Hill to mitigate freeway noise than the stability of either of these hills. Lafayette is building luxury condos right off Highway 24. Even if it is not part of this Plan - it should be rezoned if necessary and appropriate housing options considered.

We are named Pleasant Hill for a reason, perhaps a discussion of the onerous costs of development of the few vacant sites in the city is appropriate. Or perhaps more high density housing could be incorporated into future development of the flat Mangini site. It does not appear that the new developments on Taylor Blvd had much if any high density housing. There is also the vacant OSH building and the soon to be vacant Bed Bath & Beyond site, as well as the pancake house site across the street.
>ther issues with both sites given the huge density increase are the lack of parking for the number of proposed inhabitants (units x 2), proper emergency vehicle access, water and sewer capacity and the lack of public transportation and sidewalks on Paso Nagai. Paso Nagai is a narrow road with blind corners, not particularly safe for high traffic and 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2289 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) never intended to be a high traffic road. With more traffic and the blind down slope to the Alhambra traffic light, it will be unsafe. With the Morello site and several schools in the area, you will need to install traffic lights on Morello for safety.

II Rapier
19 Kawai Lane
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2290 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
"'=rom:
.Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lynette Felton < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:23 PM
Planning
Rezoning of vacant areas on Paso Noga! and Marrello
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

As a nearby resident of 26 years I vigorously oppose this plan for high density housing.

This area is not equipped to handle the increased traffic and noise this would bring. Also the increased strain on the schools and congestion of nearby businesses would impact the daily lives of many residents. Not to mention the impact to the the landscape and beautiful open space that we have enjoyed for so many years. I bought my house for this reason and did not expect high density housing to come close by since it was not zoned for that! I am disappointed that I had to learn about this from other people and not the City of Pleasant Hill.

Lynette Felton
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2291 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r""'•om:
.... ent:

To:

Subject:

Curtis Lackore <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:23 PM
Planning
High density housing Paso Nogal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Good afternoon,
I have been a resident of the New Falconpointe development for over 2o years. Over the last few years I have seen a signification increase in traffic on Paso Nogal Road with less speed enforcement. The open space on Morello and PNR is critical to the enjoyment of our properties. Clearly the development of the property will be an offense to the open space, and the significant increase in traffic and the blight accompanied with the development, with have a profound effect on it quiet enjoyment of our neighborhood. I and adamantly opposed.

Curt Lackore
2007 Ellington Terrace
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2292 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
( "'=rom:
:.ent:

To:

Subject:
[email protected]
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:20 PM
Planning
Public comment for the Planning Commision meeting May 3 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To the planning commission:

We are writing in regards to the proposed plan to rezone a couple of areas of open space around the Morello Ave and Paso Noga! Ave areas of Pleasant Hill.

We are long time residents of Pleasant Hill, living for the last 30 years on Morello Ave. We have raised our daughter here and have enjoyed the surrounding neighborhood very much.

During the years we have seen some unfortunate changes take place. The speed limit on Morello Ave was raised from a residential speed limit of 25mph to 30mph. We have seen many cars racing down the street at speeds well above the limit. We see cars often running right through the stop sign at the comer of Morello Ave and Paso Nogal Ct. There was a disturbing side show that took place one night at that very same comer. There was an attempted break in at our house by someone breaking our bathroom window with a sling shot. Luckily, our daughter was able to go to the front and call the police and the burglars left. This neighborhood does not .eed higher density housing along with more car traffic! We do not want to increase the density of our neighborhood by allowing builders to construct very large apartment buildings on the remaining open space in this area. The open space is very important to maintain the surrounding environment and wildlife and the feel for the residential neighborhood we worked so hard to be able to enjoy for so many years.

We strongly object to the proposed development changes to the open spaces! Thank you for your consideration,
Gail and Doug Grove
1915 Morello Ave
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2293 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r·,;rom:
.-,ent:

To:

Subject:

Elsa Lopez <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:20 PM
Planning
Housing project for paso nogal/morello
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To whom it may concern,
I am a long time resident of pleasant Hill in the area that will be affected by the proposed housing. I am sending an email in opposition to this plan. Our neighborhood has enough traffic and accidents due to the very transited Morello street.

We have had multiple accidents in this area with 2 happening right in front of our home, totaling ou"r vehicle and damaging our tree. One accident happened just 2 weeks ago that took down a utility pole leaving the residents without power for over 12 hours. Luckily no one has been killed but the chances of someone being hurt grows exponentially with the amount of homes that are being considered.

Our already full schools will also be impacted and the safety of our children who walk to school will be at risk. We've tried for years to make this area safer for our children and families and now this proposal is coming to worsen our efforts.

Pleasant Hill has declined in the last few years with crime and theft leaving -our police stretched and adding more people will only make it more dangerous, thus dropping the quality of life for all the residents.

We moved to Pleasant Hill over 21 years ago to provide a safe and quality life for our young family. We enjoyed the ~ .. eedom of walking to school safely and having room in our classrooms for our children to learn. This quality has been jowly declining and we have to put a stop to it for the current families to enjoy the same benefits of a safe life.

Please do not allow any money hungry developers to come in, make their money and leave our community in worse shape than before they came.

Please think of the future generations and the preservation of our beautiful small city.

A concerned citizen,
Elsa Reyes-Lopez
Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2294 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ,~rom:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Melina Ponce <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:19 PM
Planning
Objection to Low Income High Density Housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I object to this plan.

The area is way too small for such a big project.

Melina Ponce
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2295 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r ··~rom:
..,ent:

To:

Subject:

Virginia Haynes <[email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:18 PM
Planning
High density units at Paso Nogal and Morrello
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To the Planning Commission,
My husband and I bought our home in Wildflower 5 years ago. What drew us to this community was its rual nature. We very recently learned that the state is pressuring the city of Pleasant Hill to build 1800 new residences by 2040. Some must be high density, low income units.

While I understand the need for these units, I don't understand why these two locations have been chosen.

With the possibility of over 350 units going in, there will be over 700 additional cars using Paso Nogal, a two lane road with many curves. It's already difficult for the residents living on this road to turn onto it. There is also a lot of wildlife (coyotes, deer, hawks and owls) that use this road to get to the lot which it uses as a corridor.

There is no public transportation nearby, nor other services.

I believe there would be a lot of fall out should these two lots be used. There would be the possibility of the need to widen the road, thus some homes and businesses might need to be bought by eminent domain to accommodate such widening. Why impact so many people negatively when you could accommodate the demand by using other locations that would not impact anyone negatively. Locations such as the JC Penny lot ( · the overflow parking lot for DVC. No one is negatively impacted and all services and amenities are right tnere.

What was the radius in which notification was mailed regarding this proposal? We never received a letter and we live approximately 400ft from the lot on Paso Nogal.

Thank you,
Virginia Haynes
925.519.1645
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2296 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r -~rom:
.>ent:

To:
dvchousing < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:17 PM
Planning
Subject: Objection to proposal of housing projec;ts Morello terrace and Paso Nogal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Dear Sir/madam:

My husband and I are sending this email to object to the following proposal. *************************************
The City of Pleasant Hill is currently in the planning process for as many as We 396 units of "Low Income High Density" housing to be built on 2 open spaces: Paso Nogal between Morello and Alhambra Rd and on Morello Ave near the comer of Paso Nogal.

From Pleasant Hill General Plan:

Morello Terraces (6.55 acres) I
Maximum capacity: 262 units [ 6.55ac x 40du/ac]
Paso Nogal (3.4 acres) I
Aax capacity: 136 units [3.4ac x 40du/ac]
*************************************
Our family objects to plans that may put 800 more cars and 1000 or more people in this small area. Our schools are at capacity. There is also lack of public transportation and shops to support such a large community.

We are proposing that there are much more suitable locations in Pleasant Hill for such housing projects

1. near JFK university

2. The old Black Angus restaurant and nearby
Best Regards,
Patricia Ip
Henry Chan
Pleasant Hill Residents
Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2297 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
'"=rom:

Jent:

To:

Subject:

KIMBERLY SPEER < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:17 PM
Planning
Morello Terrace
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I live on Morello Drive and I absolutely object to these apartments that are proposed to being built. I have contacted the city many many times about how many people speed on Morello and how dangerous it is and it's gonna take someone being killed for you to take action. I even suggested that the city configure Morello to 2 lanes like in Martinez to slow traffic down but nothing ever gets done. People keep driving between 35-45 miles an hour on Morello Ave. and no police ~re present during commute times. This is a residential neighborhood and if you bring in 196 dwelling units, this would be a catastrophe for the existing residences not to mention bringing are home prices down. Please put yourselves in our position and pretend you live on Morello and see if you would be supporting it then. Don't let political achievements and corporate builders density tax credits, sway you. This is not what we want.

Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2298 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
,- ":rom:
$ent:

To:

Susan Hill < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:12 PM
Planning
Subject: Fwd: Objection
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

From: Susan Hill <[email protected]>
Date: May 3, 2023 at 3:08:49 PM PDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Objection
Hi! We object to low cost high density housing on Paso Nogal between Morello and Alhambra Rd and on Morello Ave near comer of Paso Nogal. We're concerned about increased traffic, decreased home value and increased crime.

Thank you,
Home owners in Saddleridge subdivision
Sent from my iPhone
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2299 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
r~rom:
..ient:

To:

Subject:
mcponce < [email protected] >
vyednesday, May 3, 2023 3:08 PM
Planning
OBJECTION to Low Income High Density Housing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender .
. I am objecting to this housing plan. The area is too small and the streets too narrow for 800 more cars and 1000 or more people! Pleasant Hill is getting too crowded already with several new houses being built / or have been built recently.

Christine Ponce
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2300 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( "=rom:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Nathan Simarro <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:08 PM
Planning
Housing Project on Paso Nogal Rd.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Good Afternoon,
I am writing to express my grave concerns regarding the possibility of a housing project on Paso Nogal Rd. We currently live at 8 Capri Ln, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 and recently moved to Pleasant Hill in October of 2022.

We moved to this particular area of Pleasant Hill from Antioch to avoid the exact problems that come with the type of development that is being proposed on Paso Nogal.

There are several issues with using the proposed area for high density housing, which will havt? a negative impact on many things we value about living in this area.

1. Public Safety & Crime: The majority of the residents in this area have families or young children such as mine that appreciate the safety associated with our local neighborhood and enjoy the open space around Paso No gal Park and the beauty of the Grayson Creek neighborhood. It's a quiet neighborhood with homeowners who take pride in our community and the area in which we live. With a housing project of this type and ( nagnitude there will undoubtedly be an increase in crime especially if it is designated low income housing. Tl-· is the exact thing we were moving away from in Antioch, when we decided to move to the Pleasant Hill area.

2. Traffic: Currently Paso Nogal is used as a cut through for commuters to get to and from Alhambra avenue and some of the other local freeways and neighborhoods. The exit point we use coming out of our neighborhood from Capri Ln is extremely steep and oftentimes around the commuting hour it is extremely dangerous for residents on our street to tum onto Paso Nogal as it is. The addition of such a huge housing project would make it nearly impossible for the residents on our street to be able to safely access Paso Nogal Rd. Even with the mirror that we have in place the blind curve turning onto Paso Nogal is a huge safety risk with the amount of increased car traffic that would come with this housing project. Cars are already often using excess speed on Paso Nogal Rd. and this will make things worse.

3. Schools & Education: One of the most important reasons we moved to this area of Pleasant Hill was to gain access to great public schools. Valhalla Elementary is the current school our child attends and it is an excellent school. However, it is already overcrowded and will not be able to accommodate additional children that would be zoned to that school due to this housing project. At the start of this year there were not enough classrooms to account for the amount of incoming children attending kindergarten. Because the classroom teacher student ratios were so bad for the incoming kindergarten class the school was in violation of the student teacher ratio allowed by state law. This led to the hiring of an additional teacher, which solved the problem for now. With more students being zoned to Valhalla Elementary through this housing project the quality of our children's education will depreciate exponentially. The school will be forced to combine kindergarten and 1st grade classes or TK/Kindergarten classes, along with other grade levels, which will severely impact our students' 1uality of education and their academic futures.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2301 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element)

4. Property Value: With the proposed housing project the surrounding neighborhood stands to lose a significant amount in home value for the reasons listed above.
,( ,lease consider the negative impact this housing project will have on our small community in the Grayson ~reek area of Pleasant Hill. There's no doubt this will bring a lot of problems to our neighborhood. With the lack of retirement housing and housing options for seniors. Even if there are some smaller scale developments to aid in these areas of housing that would make a lot more sense for this area as opposed to low income high density housing. Last month we looked into retirement housing for my mother-in-law and there is a waitlist that is over a year long and you can't even get on the waitlist. This is not a common sense solution to the housing needs of our community. Even the development. The housing projects on Morello in Martinez that include single family homes along Pine Meadow Drive are a comparable housing development project that actually makes sense and adds value to the community and should be considered as a model for this area if it is to be developed.

Thank you for your consideration of our concerns when it comes to this important matter.

Kind Regards,
Nathan Simarro
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2302 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
itrom:
5ent:

To:

Subject:

Karen Tomajan <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:07 PM
Planning
Planned Building of Homes on/near Paso Noga! Rd and Morello Ave CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Writing as a concerned homeowner of Pleasant Hill who travels Paso No gal often. This is a two lane winding road, with blind spots for traffic entering the main road from residential side streets. It is a serene area that does not need high density units built in this area. If the city feels it is necessary to add homes/townhomes to this area, the planning and residences should fit in with the landscape of the ar~a. High density does not fit. there would be so many more cars on the streets, Morello already is a minor highway as people ignore the speed limit in these residential areas. Adding more cars on these roads, near schools is just not feasible nor is it a good plan.

Please reconsider and do what is best for Pleasant Hill. No high density housing in these areas.

Karen Tomajan
Pasatiempo Ct.

Pleasant Hill
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2303 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
·om:
.,ent:

To:

Subject:

Sharen F <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:06 PM
Planning
For Public Comment at the Pleasant Hill Planning Commission meeting, 5-3-2023, 6:30 pm: We were not given any notice about this!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To:

Pleasant Hill Planning Commission
I live on Mesa Verde Place in Pleasant Hill.

A neighbor texted me a photo of this flyer (below) just moments ago. Someone she knows from a nearby neighborhood showed the notice to her.

I am very surprised & disappointed that the city of Pleasant Hill did not notify all the neighborhoods that would be affected by these proposals so we could give our feedback.

We moved to Pleasant Hill, in large part, because of the supportive, caring reputation the city has earned through the years, which is why I'm so disappointed & shocked that we didn't receive any notice about these proposals. The city claims that "notifying" apx 350 residents who signed up and or requested notifications of 1ch meetings qualifies as adequate notification. There are over 34,000 residents in the city of Pleasant Hill. rfow can this possibly fulfill the requirement of public notification? Only informing people who have reached out to the city first does not meet the standard of public notification.

After researching tonight's meeting ourselves, we see that the discussion of changing the zoning, offering financial incentives to developers, and relaxing building requirements, etc, has been going on for quite some time. I feel betrayed as a citizen of Pleasant Hill be this information was not shared with me &/or the vast majority ofresidents, as must be required by law. I'm asking that you make this right.

Traffic on Paso Nogal, Morello, & Golf Club Rd is already noisy & dangerous at times because of sideshow activity at the comer of Morello & Paso Nogal, and in the parking lot at DVC that we hear almost every single weekend. Those participating in such dangerous behavior must drive to and from these locations, and have proven that they have very poor judgment, & no regard for public safety whatsoever. Adding high density housing developments in these areas would put more people in harm's way. I have heard cars speeding up & down Paso Nogal in the past when I was expecting family & friends to visit, & I've been scared that they would be hit & injured ( or worse!!!) by one or more of these reckless drivers. I've also seen police chases on Paso Nogal & Golf Club Rd racing to & from the DVC parking lot in response to this behavior, I assume (for which, frankly, I'm grateful be I'm concerned about the cars spinning & screeching in that area, which is bordered by apartment buildings on both sides of Golf Club Rd).

Additionally, some people speed along Golf Club Rd, Paso Nogal &/or Morello on their way to and from work, etc. Adding so many residents to this area would only make matters worse. ~he stretch of Paso Nogal by the dog park is comprised of hills, is windy, & lined with large trees & overgrown vegetation making lack of visibility a real hazard, especially with increased traffic, and cars that may be 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2304 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) speeding to or from the DVC parking lot or the comer of Morello and Paso Nogal to do "doughnuts" with their cars & race each other on residential streets.
( There are severl intersections leading to quiet neighborhoods along these roads. It's already a dangerous situation for all these reasons: adding so many more people to this small area is a recipe for disaster.

The proximity to DVC is another concern. Students driving to & from school, & crossing Golf Club Rd will also be adversely impacted by increased traffic.

The curve where Golf Club Rd swings onto Paso Nogal often plays host to traffic accidents. Recently, I noticed the large guardrail had been extensively damaged by an out of control car. I have witnessed extensive damage to such guard rails on both sides of passing a gal. Numerous times over the years. The road is narrow, & skirts along a steep hill over the Contra Costa Canal. The increase in traffic here is another recipe for more accidents.

Another concern is mudslides, and the integrity of the hills, where these building developments are proposed.

These areas are known to be played by gophers which compromise the integrity of the hills, contributing to mudslides, creating the potential for serious damage to people & property.

I hope the city of Pleasant Hill, which has earned a well-deserved reputation for providing excellent city services to this community, will reconsider such plans and find more suitable, safer locations for the proposed developments.

I also hope they will push the Reset button & start this process over, giving adequate & thorough notification in a timely manner to the public from now on. The vast majority of my neighbors had no idea that any of this had been proposed, and had no idea about the meeting being held tonight for public comment.

Sharen Fretwell
...JS
I was just informed by another neighbor that such proposals were entertained for the former Kmart building ano perhaps one other place in this area. We were never informed about any of these proposals. 2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2305 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
~rom:

Jent:

To:

Subject:

SSLA COMCAST <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:06 PM
Planning
re: paso nogal housing plans ...

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

We certainly understand the need for all cities to increase the number of affordable housing units.

My questions are ...

1. what improvements will be made to paso nogal to handle the additional number of cars, bikes and pedestrians? it is a very narrow dangerous road ...

2. what new businesses will be added to the area ... such as grocery stores, etc? ( we do not think the local safeway can handle an additional 350+ households. )

3. what are the plans to repair expand all access roads to this area?

4. what about expanded law enforcement by PH and Martinez .... we have always felt "left out" ... sleepy hollow ... ignored .
. J• what about making the stop lights work better?

6. Adding another park?

7. We really enjoy the country feel that paso nogal currently provides.

8. what other neighborhoods in PH will be the host of high density housing?

9. Will the neighborhood schools be expanded and staffed to provide a great education to all the new students? btw the library is way down at the other end of town ...

10. current residents of this area should not have to suffer depreciated home values and lifestyle changes ... what is the city doing to prevent that?
Thank you for a response.

Sandra abd Richard Garcia
6636 Las Animas Dr
Martinez CA 94553
1ndie
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2306 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ~,om:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jenna Haile <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 3:00 PM
Planning
Paso Nagai at Morello Development Proposal
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Attention:

Troy Fujimoto / Ethan Bindemagel
Notice:

I am aware of the negative impact on property values in our area should this proposal be approved. Real estate agents will have to disclose the development plans to prospective buyers, making Pleasant Hill a far less desirable place to purchase or invest. Notwithstanding losing potential buyers, current property values in the area will likewise fall dramatically, affecting residents city-wide.

Local Parks: Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nogal Park have always been a destination for local residents seeking peace and quiet. Adding hundreds of residents will negatively impact our local parks.

Public Transit and Local Necessities: The proposed development sites are nowhere near freeways or BART, causing a congested mess for commuters in the area.

Thank you,
( ,. enna Haile
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2307 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
(? ~,.om:

Jent:

To:

Subject:

ROB & NANCY FOX < [email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:57 PM
Planning
Paso Nogal and Morello Avenue
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Subject: Paso Nogal at Morello Development Proposal
Attention :

Troy Fujimoto I Ethan Bindernagel
Notice:

The City has provided no notice to neighboring residents. In fact, we had to learn of the City's proposal through our neighborhood NextDoor.com postings less than 48 hours before the City's proposed meeting on May 4, 2023. This is entirely unacceptable and gives rise to a presumption that the City is putting its own fiscal interest (and those of developers) above the devoted constituents who reside here. The impact on the neighboring community will be felt for decades and our desire to live in a peaceful, safe environment should be of utmost importance to our elected members.
(raffic and Parking: The proposed additional housing will cause massive congestion and additional pollution in the area. In addition, it is unimaginable where hundreds of new residents would park. Has anyone considered the risk that we expose our children attending heschools on what's already a busy thoroughfare?
Sink Hole: For decades, the land on· Paso Nogal Road and Morello Avenue was not buildable because it sits atop a sink hole. Neighboring residents have not received any information or seen any research conducted by the City regarding the dangers of building on a sink hole.

I am keenly aware of the negative
impact on property values in our area should this proposal be approved. Real estate agents will have to disclose the development plans to prospective buyers, making Pleasant Hill a far less desirable place to purchase or invest. Notwithstanding losing potential buyers, current property values in the area will likewise fall dramatically, affecting residents city-wide. Some of us may be inclined to leave the city that we loved and raised our f amities.

Local Parks: Hidden Lakes Park and Paso Nogal Park have always been a destination for local residents seeking peace and quiet. Adding hundreds of residents will negatively impact our local parks.

Public Transit and Local Necessities: The proposed development sites are nowhere near freeways or BART, causing a congested mess for commuters in the area.

Seems sneaky .
.)incerely,
Nancy Fox
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2308 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) 603 Aleta Pl
Pleasant Hill, CA
( 14523
(
2 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2309 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r ·,.om:
..,ent:

To:

Subject:

Gabrielle Fawcett < [email protected] >
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:49 PM
Planning
Paso Nogal Housing Plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing as a concerned resident of the neighborhood of Paso Nogal/ Alhambra Road. In regards to the housing plan for 396 new units, I have several concerns. -How are the schools going to manage this/ be able to deal with this? They are already impacted. I know that the neighborhood school zoned for this already has 4 Kindergarten classrooms, and 5 First Grades with already limited space and classrooms. There is also a national teacher shortage. -This road is already dangerous, and very hard to safely pull off of and onto. This road, and intersections, are not equipped for the addition of 400-1,000 more cars. This is already a dense area, and has several schools.

Thanks for reading,
·abrielle
Gabrielle Fawcett
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2310 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) (
Lyone Conner
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

F Ryan <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:36 PM
Planning
rezoning of parcel @ Morello and Netherby
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I live on Netherby place. I do not want a high density contrition project because • Traffic safety is compromised due to the added congestion • Noise levels
• Parking concerns. If you put in 200 units, you need at least 325 parking spots. They won't, meaning even more street parking overflowing onto our private street, Netherby Place, where our HOA prohibits overnight parking • Environmental impact:
• Loss of open space o Demise of our animal population (deer, turkeys, birds) • Thousands of gallons of diesel fuel needed to grade the slopes • sink hol.e in middle of parcel
We moved to Pleasant Hill to a neighborhood we felt safe in. With the added density you propose that safety is gone.

You have no farther to Look than the high density areas surrounding DVC. They have packages stolen, catalytic converters cut out and cars stolen. The PHPD do not respond. The Contra Costa DA does not prosecute. That is not what i moved here for.

A flatter parcel must exist elsewhere in Pleasant Hill.

Jim Ryan
229 Netherby Place
Pleasant Hill Ca
Sent from Mail for Windows
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2311 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r 'rom:
.:.ent:

Ayers, Michael <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:34 PM
To: Planning
Subject: High Density
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

This is not right. unfair to people who live in the area. People that live in this area light there open spaces. Also consider the amount of cars the pollution traffic nearly 400 units which equals well over 1000 people very unfair to existing residence in the area.

Thanks,
Michael Ayers
Service Manager 9708 & 9726
Herc Rentals Inc. I 30 S. Buchanan Circle, Pacheco CA 94553 Phone: 925-680-0316 I Mobile: 510-290-6667
[email protected] I www.HercRentals.com
HercRentals1M
CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE: This message (including attachments) may contain info~ation that is privileged, confidential or protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, it is prohibited to distribute, disclose, copy, or use this message or any information contained in it. If you received this message in error, please delete it (including attachments) and notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail. 1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2312 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
r ~rom:

Sent:

To:
bijan mizani <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:29 PM
Planning
Subject: reg.Low income housing project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

Hi,
I am writing this email at the last minute regarding the concerns that i have and also showing my opposing vote to this project. I actually received this posting a few minutes ago from a friend and i am shocked that a such a important proposal and project has not been posted or mailed directly to all of the people that this will effect.

This kind of project will effect all of our property values and also bring a lot more traffic to our area. As it is we have issues with traffic and speeding cars in our neighborhood and so far for the past few year, city hall has done absolutely nothing to fix the issue. In-fact the city employees and the previous Mayer told me in person that they worry about the cost they have to go through for installing speed bumps and signs. Me and my family are worried about our security. So yes we are Oppose to this idea and project.

Thanks
Bijan Mizani
President
http://www.imexdesigns.com
http://www.imexwraps.com
http://www.imexdesignsprinting.com
[email protected]
[email protected]
Skype ID: bijanbaghermizani
Twitter: imex designs]
https :/ /www .facebook.com/imexdesigns
Cell: 925-352-4526
Work: 888-944-4639 (IMEX)
Address:
~, 17 Arnold drive Unit # 4
Martinez, CA.94553 USA
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2313 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) Lyone Conner
( ~,om:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Serianna Jenab <[email protected]>
Wednesday, May 3, 2023 2:22 PM
Planning
Letter in Opposition
Letter in Opposition.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
1 4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2314 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) SERIANNA JENAB, ESQ.
609 ALETA PLACE
PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523
May 3, 2023
City of Pleasant Hill
Planning Department
Sent Via Email to: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 925-708-8108
[email protected]
RE: Opposition to the City of Pleasant Hill Proposal to Build Additional Housing Dear City of Pleasant Hill Planning Committee,
I am writing to express my vehement opposition to the City's proposed "Low Income High Density" housing to be built in two locations of Pleasant Hill ( {namely Paso Nagai Road/Morello Avenue and Paso Nagai Road between Morello Avenue and Alhambra Road}. I live on Aleta Place, approximately ½ mile from Paso Nagai Road. This opposition is submitted on behalf of myself and the undersigned families who all own properties on Aleta Place (many of whom have lived here for decades).

My family moved to Pleasant Hill in 1997. I attended College Park High School and Diablo Valley College. After attending UC Davis and Santa Clara University School of Law, I made a point to return to Pleasant Hill and purchased a home here in 2015 because I knew first-hand what a beautiful, peaceful, serene community this is. To me, Pleasant Hill has always been a hidden gem in the Bay Area. I wanted to continue the tradition of deeply-held family values with my own children, in a town where I knew they would find a sense of community in a quiet and safe environment.

I am absolutely shocked to hear that the City is now evaluating whether to add hundreds of apartment units to the area. For the following reasons, my fellow affected residents and I oppose any additional housing being zoned or permitted in the above mentioned areas.

This is entirely unacceptable and gives rise to a presumption that the City is

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 2315 Attachment: Attachment Q - Public Comments (General Plan and Housing Element) r
City of Pleasant Hill
May 4, 2023

Page 2 of 3 ends

Pleasant Hill City CouncilMay 18, 2023

Pleasant Hill City Council
May 18, 2023