Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

Pleasant Hill City Council
June 5, 2023

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
June 5, 2023
Body
Pleasant Hill City Council
Original file
32.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pleasanthillca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
JUNE 5, 2023
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM
The meeting will be held both in person at
City Hall, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
and remotely via Zoom in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act Watch on YouTube at: www.pleasanthillca.org/councilmeeting To provide comments via teleconference, click on the meeting link and enter the meeting ID and Passcode:

Meeting link: www.zoom.us
Meeting ID: 856 7255 3807
Passcode: 443813
The meeting ID and Passcode will change each meeting. See more information on Public Participation Options below.

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 1 June 5, 2023
City Offices, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone (925) 671-5267

MAYOR TIMOTHY FLAHERTY COUNCILMEMBER SUE NOACK

VICE MAYOR MATTHEW RINN COUNCILMEMBER ZAC SHESS

COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN VINSON
Options for observing the meeting and participating in public comment are provided below.

Public Communication. The public is welcome to address the City Council on items on the Consent Calendar or other items not listed on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction during the general Public Comment period.

There is an opportunity for the public to comment on other agenda items at the time they are discussed. Comments are generally limited to three minutes.

Public Participation Options
1) Watch the Meeting via Youtube Livestream at www.pleasanthillca.org/councilmeeting. 2) Submit Written Comments by 4 pm the Day of the Meeting to [email protected] (comments received by deadline will be provided to the City Council before the meeting). Please specify that the correspondence is for public comment at the Council meeting. 3) Make Public Comment During the Meeting
When the Mayor invites public comment (or public comments on specific agenda items), you may participate in one of the following three ways:
a. Via Zoom
Go to www.Zoom.us using your computer/smart device and enter the Meeting ID and Passcode provided near the top of this page. We ask that you state your name and city of residence for the record when you start your comments. Please use the "Raise hand" feature in Zoom. You will not be seen or heard until it is your turn to speak. You will be invited into the meeting and asked to speak when it is your turn.

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 2 June 5, 2023
b. Via Phone
Call (669) 900-6833 and enter the Zoom Meeting ID and Passcode. Press *9 to “raise your hand” to alert staff that you wish to speak.
c. In Person
Members of the public may attend the meeting in person and may speak on any matter within the City Council's jurisdiction. Please fill out a speaker's card, available at the entry to the Council Chambers, and turn it in to the City Clerk Recorder.

If, due to a disability, a reasonable accommodation is needed to participate in this meeting, please refer to the Providing Accessible Communication to the Public Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and AB 2449 document online at www.pleasanthillca.org/accessiblecommunications and contact the ADA Coordinator 48 hours in advance of the meeting at (925) 671-5267 or via California Relay at 711.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available to the public in the City’s Public Records Portal at https://cityarchive.pleasanthillca.org/WebLink/ (click on City Council Agenda Packets) or by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 925- 671-5267.

City Council Meeting Recordings and Broadcasts.

Recorded City Council meetings are broadcast on Comcast Channel 28, Wave Channel 1029, and AT&T UVerse Channel 99 on the Wednesday following the meeting. Video recordings are generally available within 48 hours of the meeting, and may be viewed on the City’s website at www.pleasanthillca.org/MeetingVideos and selecting “City Council” from the meeting groups.

Agendas are Available for Review on the City Hall official noticing bulletin board (100 Gregory Lane), at the Pleasant Hill Police Department (330 Civic Drive), the Pleasant Hill Senior Center (233 Gregory Lane), and on the City’s website at www.pleasanthillca.org/agendas. Agenda packets will be available to the public on the City’s website at the same time as they are made available to the City Council.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL

4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 Resolution Recognizing Michael G. Harris for Years of Dedicated Public Service Presented by Senator Bill Dodd

5.2 Introduction of Commission on Aging Commissioner Bill Musick and Measure K Oversight Committee Member Cindy Tunales
City Council Meeting Agenda Page 3 June 5, 2023

5.3 Proclamation Declaring June 19, 2023 as Juneteenth National Freedom Day

5.4 Proclamation Designating June 2023 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, Plus (LGBTQ+) Pride Month

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
(Brief updates on pending City business without discussion by the City Council.)

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS

7.1 Reports from Councilmembers on Meetings or Conferences Attended at City Expense (A) Contra Costa Mayors Conference Hosted by the City of Oakley on June 1, 2023 (B) Other Meetings Attended at City Expense

7.2 Announcements from Councilmembers

8. PUBLIC COMMENT:

The public is welcome at this time to address the City Council on items on the Consent Calendar or other items not listed on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction. There is an opportunity for the public to comment on other agenda items at the time they are discussed.

Comments are limited to three minutes per speaker. To provide public comments, please see the Public Participation Options above.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under “Consent Calendar” are considered by the Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate Council discussion of these items unless requested by a Councilmember prior to the time Council votes on the motion to adopt.

9.1 Approve Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting of May 15, 2023 and for the Special City Council Meetings of May 18, 2023 and May 22, 2023

9.2 Approve Checks Dated: May 12, 2023; May 19, 2023; May 26, 2023

9.3 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Approving the City of Pleasant Hill Investment Policy Effective July 1, 2023 and Delegating Investment Authority to the Elected City Treasurer

9.4 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 to Identify the Contra Costa Boulevard (Harriet Drive to Viking Drive) Improvement Project for the Expenditure of Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Funds of Senate Bill 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017

9.5 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Second Amendment to a Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design, Inc., for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project No. 03-20

9.6 Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Authorizing Participation in and Approving the Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement of the Fire Risk Management Services Joint Powers Authority
City Council Meeting Agenda Page 4 June 5, 2023

10. ACTION CALENDAR

10.1 Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Approving the Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 in Assessment District No. 20

10.2 Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. ___-23 Approving the Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessments, and Ordering Levy of Assessments for FY2023-2024 in Assessment District No. 22

10.3 Adopt Resolution ___-23 Accepting the Diablo View Road and Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Improvements Project No. 22-05 as Complete and Authorizing the City Engineer to issue and record a Notice of Completion

10.4 Adopt Resolution No. __-23 Accepting Bid and Awarding a Construction Contract to Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc. for Phase I of the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23 and the Grayson Creek Restoration and Mitigation Project Exempt pursuant to Section 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption

10.5 Public Hearing to Consider Draft Maps and Composition of Districts for By-District Elections The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA (Section 21605) and CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c)(3) and 15378. Conducting public hearings for public input regarding transitioning to by-district elections and discussing a schedule for future hearings meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA.

10.6 Proclamation Commending June Catalano for Exemplary Service to the City of Pleasant Hill from 2006 to 2023, and Designating June 16, 2023 as June Catalano Day

11. ADJOURNMENT
Next City Council Meeting: June 26, 2023

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: APPROVE MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 15, 2023 AND FOR THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS OF MAY 18, 2023 AND MAY 22, 2023

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Approve the minutes.

ATTACHMENT(S):

May 15, 2023 – Tentative Minutes
May 18, 2023 – Tentative Minutes
May 22, 2023 – Tentative Minutes
Prepared by: Carol Wu, City Clerk Recorder

9.1 Packet Pg. 5

MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
May 15, 2023
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 May 15, 2023
Mayor Flaherty called a Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:12 PM, in the Council Chambers, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA, complete proceedings of which were electronically recorded. The meeting was a hybrid of both in person and teleconferenced attendees. The meeting agenda was posted on the City Hall outdoor bulletin board at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA on May 11, 2023, by Deputy City Clerk Juanita Davalos.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Timothy M. Flaherty Mayor Present
Matthew Rinn Vice Mayor Present
Sue Noack Councilmember Present (via Zoom)
Allen Vinson Councilmember Present
Zac Shess Councilmember Present

4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Mayor Flaherty stated that the City Council had adjourned from a closed session and there was nothing to report.

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 Awards of Appreciation to Mike MacDonald for Service on the Commission on Aging from 2022 – 2023 and to Kathy Arras for Service on the Commission on Aging from 2015 - 2023
Mayor Flaherty presented awards of appreciation to outgoing Commission on Aging Commissioners Mike MacDonald and Kathy Arras.

5.2 Introduction of Commission on Aging Commissioners Linda Fisher and Dana Simmons
Mayor Flaherty introduced Linda Fisher and Dana Simmons, the new Commission on Aging Commissioners.

5.3 Awards of Appreciation to Dave Kludt for Service on the Education Commission from 2018 - 2023 and to Jennifer Andersen for Service on the Education Commission from 2012 – 2023
Mayor Flaherty presented awards of appreciation to outgoing Education Commissioners Dave Kludt and Jennifer Andersen.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 6
Attachment: May 15, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 May 15, 2023

5.4 Introduction of Diversity Commissioners Daniel Rodriguez, Lloyd Schine, and Zhanna Thompson
Mayor Flaherty introduced Daniel Rodriguez, Lloyd Schine, and Zhanna Thompson, the new Diversity Commissioners.

5.5 Proclamation Designating June 2, 2023 as Gun Violence Awareness Day Mayor Flaherty presented a proclamation to Cri Campbell Schine, Survivor Lead for Greater Mt.

Diablo Moms Demand Action, declaring June 2, 2023 as Gun Violence Awareness Day.

5.6 Proclamation Designating the Month of May as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month
Mayor Flaherty presented a proclamation to Carson Sprott, Chair of the Diversity Commission, declaring the month of May as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month.

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
June Catalano, City Manager, reported that:
 The Golden State Warriors watch party was sponsored by Off the Grid, Stay Pleasant Hill, and the Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce;  The Art, Wine, and Music Festival will be held on May 20-21, 2023;  The Juneteenth celebration will be held on June 18, 2023; and  The City has currently received 19 applications for the Social Media Assistance Grants program.

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS

7.1 Reports from Councilmembers on Meetings or Conferences Attended at City Expense
(A) Contra Costa Mayors Conference Hosted by the City of San Ramon on May 4, 2023
Mayor Flaherty and Councilmember Noack reported their attendance at the Contra Costa Mayors Conference. Councilmember Noack provided a brief report on the discussion topics. (B) Other Meetings Attended at City Expense
None

7.2 Announcements from Councilmembers

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: May 15, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 May 15, 2023
Vice Mayor Rinn reported his attendance at the ribbon cutting for the new art building at Diablo Valley College; the Berkshire Hathaway Chili Cookoff; and the Pleasant Hill Baseball Association final banquet.

Councilmember Vinson reported his attendance at the Laugh, Love, Learn event held at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center.

Councilmember Shess reported his attendance at the Off the Grid Golden State Warriors watch party; and at an Economic Development Subcommittee meeting.

Mayor Flaherty reported his attendance at both Off the Grid Golden State Warriors watch parties; and a ribbon cutting at the Diablo Valley College Tesla Start program. Mayor Flaherty on the May 6, 2023 Special City Council meeting regarding district-based elections.

8. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Flaherty opened public comment.

The following member of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:
 Robert Kattenburg
The following member of the public participated via teleconference to make a comment:
 Marian Shostrom
Mayor Flaherty closed public comment.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion (Rinn/Vinson) to Approve all consent items, carried as follows:

AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty

9.1 Approve Minutes for the Regular City Council Meetings of April 17, 2023 and May 1 2023, and the Special City Council Meeting of May 6, 2023

9.2 Approve Checks Dated: April 28, 2023 and May 5, 2023

9.3 Accept Update on Contra Costa Transportation Authority and TRANSPAC

9.4 Adopt Resolution No. 30-23 Approving Side Letter of Agreement With the Management Pay Plan Group to Add a New Classification to the Management Compensation Pay Plan and Align the Chief Technology Officer Salary with Administrative Service Managers

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: May 15, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 May 15, 2023

9.5 Adopt Resolution No. 31-23 Approving Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments and to Provide for Public Hearing and Notice in Assessment District No. 20 for Fiscal Year 2023/2024

9.6 Adopt Resolution No. 32-23 Approving Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments and to Provide for Public Hearing and Notice in Assessment District No. 22 for Fiscal Year 2023/2024

9.7 Approve Appointment Recommendations to the Civic Action Commission and Contra Costa Transportation Authority Advisory Committee

9.8 Adopt Resolution No. 33-23 Authorizing the City Manager to Notify the Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce that They are Released from the Requirement to Conduct and Submit to the City a Financial Audit of the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District for the Period July 1, 2021 to March 30, 2022

9.9 Adopt Resolution No. 34-23 Approving a Second Amendment to the Agreement with Stay Pleasant Hill to Serve as the Owners' Association for the Pleasant Hill Tourism Improvement District and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Amendment

10. ACTION CALENDAR

10.1 Adopt Resolution No. 35-23 Approving the Funding for the 2023 Intersection and Crosswalk Improvements Project and the Use of the American Rescue Plan Act Funds to Pay for the Crossing Guard Program for the 2023/2024 School Year
Ananthan Kanagasanduram, City Engineer, delivered a presentation regarding the results of a March 2023 City funded study analyzing the crossing guard program. Mr. Kanagasanduram explained the proposed infrastructure solutions which would remove the need for crossing guards.

Jaime Rodriguez, Consultant from Traffic Patterns, was present via teleconference to answer questions asked by Councilmembers.

The following members of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:
 Bobby Glover
 Lindsey Dohlman
 Zhanna Thompson
Vice Mayor Rinn requested an amendment to the resolution to eliminate the obligation for the City to fund the cost of the crossing guards.

Motion (Flaherty/Noack) to Approve item 10.1 as amended, carried as follows:

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: May 15, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 May 15, 2023
AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty

11. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Flaherty adjourned the meeting at 9:07 p.m. in memory of Dr. Carol Weyland Conner, Founder of the White Pony Express. The next Special City Council meeting will be held on Thursday, May 18, 2023, beginning at 5:00 p.m.

CAROL W. WU, CITY CLERK RECORDER

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: May 15, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)

MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
May 18, 2023
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 May 18, 2023
Mayor Flaherty called a Special Meeting of the City Council to order at 5:21 PM, in the Council Chambers, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA, complete proceedings of which were electronically recorded. The meeting was a hybrid of both in person and teleconferenced attendees. The meeting agenda was posted on the City Hall outdoor bulletin board at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA on May 12, 2023, by Deputy City Clerk Juanita Davalos.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Timothy M. Flaherty Mayor Present
Matthew Rinn Vice Mayor Present
Sue Noack Councilmember Present (via Zoom)
Allen Vinson Councilmember Present
Zac Shess Councilmember Present
Public Comment
Mayor Flaherty opened public comment.

There was no public comment.

Mayor Flaherty closed public comment.

4. ACTION CALENDAR

4.1 Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution No.36-23, a Resolution of Findings and Certifying an Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2022070095) and Adopting Environmental Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, Adopt Resolution No.38-23 Adopting the City of Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan, and Adopt Resolution No. 37-23 Repealing the 2015- 2023 City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element and Adopting the 2023-2031 City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element.

Troy Fujimoto, City Planner, introduced the item and provided the background and overview of the Planning Commission’s recommendations on the Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan, the 2023-2031 Housing Element, and the accompanying Environmental Impact Report.

Brent Gibbons, Mintier Harnish, delivered a presentation on the City of Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan.

Ryan Lister, Mintier Harnish, delivered a presentation on the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

Leslie Trejo, Rincon Consultants, delivered a presentation on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

The following members of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: May 18, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 May 18, 2023
 Brian Schaefer
 Don Smallen
 Christine Howard
 Caroline Ryan
 Matt Kennedy
 Todd Lohman
 Mark Lubiszewski
 Richard Roberts
 Shelley Cullimore
 Colin McGuisery (submitted a speaker card with comments, but did not wish to speak)  Heather McCall
 Andy Azadnia
 David Scholz
 Ward Wogsland
 Valerie Sloven
 Robert Seidenspinner
 Paul Bittner
 Amy Garcia
 Roger Wyman
 Charles Ener
 Susan Barlettani
 Doug Prutton
 Nonie Plizga
 Maria Baughart
 Bijan Mizani
 Deborah Gross (submitted a speaker card, but was not present to speak)  John Hoopt (submitted a speaker card, but was not present to speak)  Ron Haynes
 Reginald Hunt
 Suzette Briggs
 Carmelia Duse
 Mojgan Rahimi
 John Darlina
 Ali Cazi
 Tony Baker
 Curt Hill
 Laura Keil
 Bill Fazakerly
 Maria Berta
The following members of the public participated via teleconference to make a comment:

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: May 18, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 May 18, 2023
 Doug Sandy, President of the Garden View Homeowners Association  Andrei Obolenskiy
 Thais Yafet
 Doug (no last name given)
 Darren Hall
 Sebastian Cabrera
 Ting Zhu
 River Lazzeretti
 Craig Lazzeretti
 Tala (no last name given)
 Bill Schrambling
 Vera Obolenskaya
 Joel (no last name given)
Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing.

Mayor Flaherty called for a recess at 7:02 p.m.

Mayor Flaherty reconvened the meeting at 7:17 p.m.

Mayor Flaherty called for a recess at 9:49 p.m.

Mayor Flaherty reconvened the meeting at 10:05 p.m.

Motion (Noack/Vinson) to Approve the adoption of Resolution No. 36-23, a resolution of findings and certifying an Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2022070095) and adopting Environmental Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan.

AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty
Motion (Flaherty/Rinn) to Approve the adoption of Resolution No. 37-23 repealing the 2015- 2023 City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element and adopting the 2023-2031 City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element.

AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty
Motion (Rinn/Vinson) to Approve the adoption of Resolution No. 38-23 adopting the City of Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan.

AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: May 18, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 May 18, 2023

5. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Flaherty adjourned the meeting at 10:49 p.m. The next Special City Council meeting will be held on Monday, May 22, 2023, beginning at 7:00 p.m.

CAROL W. WU, CITY CLERK RECORDER

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: May 18, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)

MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
May 22, 2023
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 May 22, 2023
Mayor Flaherty called a Special Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:05 PM, in the Council Chambers, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA, complete proceedings of which were electronically recorded. The meeting was a hybrid of both in person and teleconferenced attendees. The meeting agenda was posted on the City Hall outdoor bulletin board at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA on May 19, 2023, by Deputy City Clerk Juanita Davalos.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Timothy M. Flaherty Mayor Present
Matthew Rinn Vice Mayor Present
Sue Noack Councilmember Present (via Zoom)
Allen Vinson Councilmember Present
Zac Shess Councilmember Present

4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Mayor Flaherty stated that the City Council had adjourned from a closed session and there was nothing to report.

Public Comment
Mayor Flaherty opened public comment.

The following members of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:
 Matt Kennedy
 Pete Bennett
 Marshall Lewis
 Maria Baughart
Mayor Flaherty closed public comment.

Council Announcements and Reports
Mayor Flaherty, Vice Mayor Rinn, and Councilmembers Shess and Vinson, reported their attendance at the Pleasant Hill Art, Wine & Music festival.

Mayor Flaherty announced that the Memorial Day Observance will be held on May 29, 2023 at the Contra Costa County Veterans Monument; and that the Hillcrest Pleasant Hill housing development held a grand opening on May 20, 2023.

9.1.c
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: May 22, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 May 22, 2023

5. ACTION CALENDAR

5.1 Public Hearing to Consider Draft Maps and Composition of Districts for ByDistrict Elections Mayor Flaherty explained the purpose of the special meeting.

Janet Coleson, City Attorney, introduced the item, the last required public hearing, to receive input from the community concerning transitioning to by-district elections. Ms. Coleson gave an overview of the maps submitted and requested the Council review the maps and provide direction to staff on maps to be further considered or possible revisions to maps proposed. She noted that once a map is identified, an ordinance would be drafted and brought back for two readings at future City Council meetings before adopted.

The following members of the public provided a written comment:
 Marian Shostrom
 Susan Hedgpeth
 Heather Rosmarin
The following members of the public appeared in person to provide a comment:
 Valerie Sloven
 Theresa Nidetz
 Stephen Abrams
 Yehudit Lieberman
 Marshall Lewis
 Matt Kennedy
 Michelle Simone
The following members of the public participated via teleconference to make a comment:
 Susan Hedgpeth
 Dick Offerman
 Karen Yapp
 Marian Shostrom
Jim Priest, Best Best & Krieger, was present via teleconference to answer questions asked by Councilmembers.

Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing.

Councilmembers created a subcommittee consisting of Councilmembers Noack and Shess to further analyze Map 5, and return with recommendations for changes if any to a future City Council meeting.

9.1.c
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: May 22, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 May 22, 2023
Motion (Flaherty/Vinson) to Approve the creation of a subcommittee consisting of Councilmembers Noack and Shess.

AYES: Noack, Rinn, Shess, Vinson, Flaherty

4. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Flaherty adjourned the meeting at 8:44 p.m. The next Regular City Council meeting will be held on Monday, June 5, 2023, beginning at 7:00 p.m.

CAROL W. WU, CITY CLERK RECORDER

9.1.c
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: May 22, 2023 Tentative Minutes (Minutes)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: APPROVE CHECKS DATED: MAY 12, 2023; MAY 19, 2023; MAY 26, 2023

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Approve the check register.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Check Register
Prepared by: Pam Chamberlin, Accounting Technician I
Approved by: Erick Cheung, Finance Manager

9.2 Packet Pg. 18

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Check Register (Check Register)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 APPROVING THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL INVESTMENT POLICY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2023

AND DELEGATING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE ELECTED

CITY TREASURER

SYNOPSIS
California state law requires the City Treasurer to render a statement of Investment Policy annually to the City Council at a public meeting and the City Council to annually delegate investment authority to the City Treasurer. The Budget Committee reviewed the investment policy at its meeting of May 3, 2023 and recommended approval to City Council. The City Treasurer recommends the Council adopt the proposed resolution approving the City of Pleasant Hill Investment Policy attached to the resolution effective July 1, 2023 and delegating the investment authority to the elected City Treasurer.

DISCUSSION
Background
Government Code 53607 et seq. requires the City Treasurer to “render” annually to the legislative body of the local agency at a public meeting a statement of investment policy. The investment policy is intended as a guide with specific controls for safety, liquidity and, lastly, yields.

Analysis
In consultation with the City’s professional investment advisor, Kara Hooks - Chandler Asset Management, the City Treasurer and Finance Department reviewed the City’s investment policy to 1) confirm that it continues to comply with California Government Code and 2) continues to provide strong safeguards over the City’s investment program. While the City’s investment policy continues to be robust, it is recommended that the City add additional protections recognized as industry best practices. The following are the main proposed changes in the attached Investment Policy:

9.3 Packet Pg. 60
 Delivery, Safekeeping of Securities, and Custody: It is recommended the City adjust the exceptions list to remove mutual funds are not included in the Authorized Investments section.
 Internal Controls: It is recommended the City include language discussing internal controls to further emphasis methods to maintain safety of the portfolio.  Prudence: It is recommended the City enhance the Prudent Investor Standard language to include the full quote from California Government Code.  Money Market Mutual Funds: It is recommended the City make a minor edit to the sentence describing the amount allowed to be invested in Money Market Mutual Funds.  Glossary: It is recommended the City include a Glossary section to enhance the clarity of the investment policy by defining terms that may be unknown to a reader.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department.

The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt the proposed resolution approving the City of Pleasant Hill Investment Policy effective July 1, 2023, and delegating the investment authority to the elected City Treasurer.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
City of Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redlined City of Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean
Prepared by: Andrew Kalinowski, City Treasurer

9.3 Packet Pg. 61
RESOLUTION NO. -23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

APPROVING THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL INVESTMENT POLICY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2023 AND DELEGATING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE CITY TREASURER WHEREAS, California state law requires the City Treasurer to render a statement of Investment Policy annually to the City Council at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, California state law requires the City Council to annually delegate investment authority to the City Treasurer.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, approves the City of Pleasant Hill Investment Policy (attached) effective July 1, 2023, and delegates investment authority to the elected City Treasurer of the City of Pleasant Hill for the fiscal year July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 1 CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

INVESTMENT POLICY
Effective July 1, 20222023

INTRODUCTION
The investment policy of the City of Pleasant Hill is based upon State of California Government Code, 53600 et seq.. The primary goals of this policy are:

1. To ensure compliance with all State and Local laws governing the investment of monies in the custody of the City Treasurer.

2. To protect the principal monies entrusted to the City Treasurer.

3. To meet the daily cash flow demands of the City.

4. To generate the maximum amount of investment income within the parameters of prudent risk management.

The monies entrusted to the City Treasurer constitute the "Investment Portfolio" referred to in this document.

DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
In the City of Pleasant Hill, management responsibility for investments is herewith delegated to the Elected City Treasurer pursuant to Gov. Code, 53607. The Treasurer shall establish procedures for the operation of an investment program consistent with this investment policy and shall perform investment transactions. The Treasurer may retain the services of an investment advisor. These procedures will include reference to safekeeping, wire transfer agreements, banking service contracts and collateral/depository agreements. The Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken.

The Treasurer shall appoint a Deputy City Treasurer who shall perform the Treasurer's duties in the absence of the Treasurer.

SCOPE
The Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the City Treasury.

This investment policy applies to the investment activities of the City of Pleasant Hill.

The invested assets of the City, with the following three exceptions, shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this policy. The exceptions are the Public Employees Retirement System and Deferred Compensation Funds, which are administered separately by trustees, and Bond proceeds which are invested according to the specifications of the bond indenture according to Government Code 53601(1).

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 2 OBJECTIVES
Objectives have been set in order to achieve the goals of this investment policy. The primary objectives, in priority order, of the City of Pleasant Hill's investment policy are:

A. Safety of Principal
Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City of Pleasant Hill. With each investment transaction the Treasurer shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether these losses are from securities default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk: credit risk and market risk.

Further guidelines for safety of principal shall include:

1. Limiting the Portfolio's exposure to each issue and each issuer of debt.

2. Determining minimum credit requirements for firms that hold City monies.

B. Liquidity
The City of Pleasant Hill's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements, which might be reasonably anticipated.

C. Return on Investment
Return on investment shall be an average market rate of return governed by the objectives of safety and liquidity in accord with prudent investment principles.

MATURITIES
Maturities shall be selected to anticipate cash needs, thereby eliminating the possibility of the need for forced investment liquidation. Cash flow estimates shall be prepared in a prudent manner.

The City will not invest in securities maturing more than five (5) years from the date of trade settlement, unless the City Council has granted authority to make such an investment.

QUALIFIED DEALERS
To the extent practicable, the Treasurer shall endeavor to complete investment transactions using a competitive bid process whenever possible. The City’s Treasurer will determine which financial institutions are authorized to provide investment services to the City. It shall be the City’s policy to purchase securities only from authorized institutions and firms.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 3 The Treasurer shall maintain procedures for establishing a list of authorized broker/dealers and financial institutions which are approved for investment purposes that are selected through a process of due diligence as determined by the City. Due inquiry shall determine whether such authorized broker/dealers, and the individuals covering the City are reputable and trustworthy, knowledgeable and experienced in Public Agency investing and able to meet all of their financial obligations. These institutions may include "primary" dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 15c3-1 (uniform net capital rule).

In accordance with Section 53601.5, institutions eligible to transact investment business with the City include:
 Institutions licensed by the state as a broker-dealer.  Institutions that are members of a federally regulated securities exchange.  Primary government dealers as designated by the Federal Reserve Bank and non-primary government dealers.
 Nationally or state-chartered banks.
 The Federal Reserve Bank.
 Direct issuers of securities eligible for purchase.

Selection of financial institutions and broker/dealers authorized to engage in transactions will be at the sole discretion of the City, except where the City utilizes an external investment adviser in which case the City may rely on the adviser for selection.

All financial institutions and securities dealers who desire to engage in investment transactions with the City of Pleasant Hill shall certify that the supervising officer has reviewed the City's investment policy and agrees to disclose potential conflicts or risks to public funds that might arise out of business transactions between the firm/depository and the City of Pleasant Hill. Employees of any financial institution offering securities or investments to the City of Pleasant Hill shall be trained in the precautions appropriate to public sector investments and shall be required to familiarize themselves with the City's Investment Policy.

The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to all dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation of receipt of this policy shall be considered evidence that the dealer understands the City's investment policies, and intends to offer the City only appropriate investments.

Public deposits will be made only in qualified public depositories as established by State law. Deposits will be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or, to the extent the amount exceeds the insured maximum, will be collateralized in accordance with State law.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 4 Selection of broker/dealers used by an external investment adviser retained by the City will be at the sole discretion of the adviser. Where possible, transactions with broker/dealers shall be selected on a competitive basis and their bid or offering prices shall be recorded. If there is no other readily available competitive offering, best efforts will be made to document quotations for comparable or alternative securities. When purchasing original issue instrumentality securities, no competitive offerings will be required as all dealers in the selling group offer those securities at the same original issue price.

DELIVERY, SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES, AND CUSTODY
To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City (including collateral on repurchase agreements), shall be held in the City's name in safekeeping by a third party custodian. Said trust department shall act as agent for the City of Pleasant Hill pursuant to a custody agreement between the bank and the City. All securities shall be received and delivered using standard delivery-versus-payment procedures. The Custodian shall provide safekeeping receipts of all securities held. A monthly report will be received by the City from the custodian listing all securities held in safekeeping with current market data and other information.

The only exceptions to the foregoing shall be depository accounts and securities purchases made with: (i) local government investment pools; (ii) time certificates of deposit, and, (iii) mutual funds and money market mutual funds, since these securities are not deliverable.

COLLATERALIZATION
Certificates of Deposit: The City shall require any commercial bank or savings and loan association to deposit eligible securities with an agency of a depository approved by the State Banking Department to secure any uninsured portion of a Non-Negotiable Certificate of Deposit. The value of eligible securities as defined pursuant to California Government Code, Section 53651, pledged against a Certificate of Deposit shall be equal to 150% of the face value of the CD if the securities are classified as mortgages and 110% of the face value of the CD for all other classes of security.

Collateralization of Bank Deposits: This is the process by which a bank or financial institution pledges securities, or other deposits for the purpose of securing repayment of deposited funds. The City shall require any bank or financial institution to comply with the collateralization criteria defined in California Government Code, Section 53651.

Repurchase Agreements: The City requires that Repurchase Agreements be collateralized only by securities authorized in accordance with California Government Code:
 The securities which collateralize the repurchase agreement shall be priced at Market Value, including any Accrued Interest plus a margin. The Market

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 5 Value of the securities that underlie a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102% or greater of the funds borrowed against those securities.  Financial institutions shall mark the value of the collateral to market at least monthly and increase or decrease the collateral to satisfy the ratio requirement described above.
 The City shall receive monthly statements of collateral.

ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Investment Officers, i.e., the City Treasurer and the Deputy City Treasurer, shall be governed by the "Code of Ethics" and the "Code of Professional Conduct" of the California Municipal Treasurers Association. The Investment Officers shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which would impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions.

INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Treasurer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the entity are protected from loss, theft or misuse. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management.

PRUDENCE
GenerallyPursuant to California Government Code, Section 53600.3, all persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of the City are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent investor standard" rule, which states:
“…all governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds pursuant to this chapter are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the Agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the Agency. Within the limitations of this section and considering individual investments as part of an overall strategy, investments may be acquired as authorized by law.”"...investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 6 management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." Officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.

AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
The City is governed by California Government Code, Sections 53600 et. seq. Within the context of these limitations, the City seeks to further restrict eligible investments to the guidelines listed below. In the event a discrepancy is found between this policy and the Code, the more restrictive parameters will take precedence. Percentage holding limits and minimum credit quality listed in this section apply at the time the security is purchased. Any investment currently held at the time the policy is adopted which does not meet the new policy guidelines can be held until maturity and shall be exempt from the current policy. At the time of the investment’s maturity or liquidation, such funds shall be reinvested only as provided in the current policy.

An appropriate risk level shall be maintained by primarily purchasing securities that are of high quality, liquid, and marketable. The portfolio shall be diversified by security type and institution to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual issuers.

The following investments are authorized:

1. United States Treasury Bills, Bonds, Notes, and other government obligations for which the full faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the City may invest in U.S. Treasuries, provided that the maximum maturity is five (5) years.

2. Obligations issued by Federal Agencies or United States Government-Sponsored Enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the Agency may invest in Federal Agency or Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), provided that:
a) No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in any single Agency/GSE issuer.
b) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years. c) The maximum percent of agency callable securities in the portfolio will be 20%.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 7 3. Municipal securities, including obligations of the City, the State of California and any local agency within the State of California, provided that:
a) The securities are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”).
b) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. c) No more than 30% of the portfolio may be in Municipal Securities. d) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

4. Municipal securities (Registered Treasury Notes or Bonds) of any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California:
a) The securities are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”).
b) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. c) No more than 30% of the portfolio may be in Municipal Securities. d) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

5. Banker’s Acceptances, provided that:
a) They are issued by institutions which have short-term debt obligations rated “A-1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO; or long-term debt obligations which are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
b) No more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Banker’s Acceptances.
c) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. d) The maximum maturity does not exceed 180 days.

6. Commercial Paper, provided that the securities are issued by an entity that meets all of the following conditions in either paragraph (a) or (b) and other requirements specified below:
a) Securities issued by corporations:
o A corporation organized and operating in the United States with assets more than $500 million.
o The securities are rated “A-1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
o If the issuer has other debt obligations, they must be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 8 b) Securities issued by other entities:
o The issuer is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company. o The securities must have program-wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, overcollateralization, letters of credit, or a surety bond.
o The securities are rated “A-1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
 No more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer.
 No more than 25% of the City’s investment assets under management may be invested in Commercial Paper.
 No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer.  The maximum maturity does not exceed 270 days.

7. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (NCDs), issued by a nationally or statechartered bank, a savings association or a federal association, a state or federal credit union, or by a federally licensed or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank, provided that:
a) The amount of the NCD insured up to the FDIC limit does not require any credit ratings.
b) Any amount above the FDIC insured limit must be issued by institutions which have short-term debt obligations rated “A-1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO; or long-term obligations rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO. c) No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in NCDs. d) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. e) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

8. Federally Insured Time Deposits (Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit) in state or federally chartered banks, savings and loans, or credit unions, provided that:
a) The amount per institution is limited to the maximum covered under federal insurance.
b) No more than 20% of the portfolio will be invested in a combination of federally insured and collateralized time deposits.
c) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

9. Collateralized Time Deposits (Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit) in state or federally chartered banks, savings and loans, or credit unions in excess of insured amounts which are fully collateralized with securities in accordance with California law, provided that:

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 9 d) No more than 20% of the portfolio will be invested in a combination of federally insured and collateralized time deposits.
e) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

10. Collateralized Bank Deposits. City’s deposits with financial institutions will be collateralized with pledged securities per California Government Code, Section 53651. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the City may invest in collateralized bank deposits.

11. Repurchase Agreements collateralized with securities authorized under California Government Code, maintained at a level of at least 102% of the market value of the Repurchase Agreement. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the City may invest, provided that:
a) Securities used as collateral for Repurchase Agreements will be delivered to an acceptable third party custodian.
b) Repurchase Agreements are subject to a Master Repurchase Agreement between the City and the provider of the repurchase agreement. The Master Repurchase Agreement will be substantially in the form developed by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA). c) The maximum maturity does not exceed one (1) year.

12. Medium Term Corporate Notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States, provided that:
a) The securities are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
b) No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in medium term notes.
c) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. d) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

13. Money Market Mutual Funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and issued by diversified management companies and meet either of the following criteria:
a) Have attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two (2) NRSROs; or
b) Have retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years’ experience managing money market mutual funds with assets under management in excess of $500 million.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 10  No more than 20% of the total portfolio may be invested in the shares of any one Money Market Mutual Funds.

14. Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) - pool established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies, up to the maximum amount permitted by LAIF.

15. Supranational obligations, provided that:
 Issues are US dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank.
 The securities are rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO.
 No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in these securities.
 No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer.  The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

16. Asset-Backed, Mortgage-Backed, Mortgage Pass-Through Securities, and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations from issuers not defined in sections 1 and 2 of the Authorized Investments section of this policy, provided that:
 The securities are rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO.
 No more than 20% of the total portfolio may be invested in these securities.
 No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single AssetBacked or Commercial Mortgage security issuer.  The maximum legal final maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

INELIGIBLE INVESTMENTS
 State law notwithstanding, any investments not specifically described herein are prohibited, including, but not limited to futures and options.  In accordance with Government Code, Section 53601.6, investment in inverse floaters, range notes, or mortgage derived interest-only strips is prohibited.
 Investment in any security that could result in a zero interest accrual if held to maturity is prohibited Under a provision sunsetting on January 1,

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 11 2026, securities backed by the U.S. Government that could result in a zero- or negative-interest accrual if held to maturity are permitted.  Trading securities for the sole purpose of speculating on the future direction of interest rates is prohibited.
 Purchasing or selling securities on margin is prohibited.  The use of reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending or any other form of borrowing or leverage is prohibited.
 The purchase of foreign currency denominated securities is prohibited.  Agencies that are not Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIB) as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission are prohibited from purchasing Private Placement Securities. The SEC defines a QIB as having at least $100,000,000 in securities owned and invested.

INVESTMENT POOLS/MUTUAL FUNDS
The City shall conduct a thorough investigation of any pool or mutual fund prior to making an investment, and on a continual basis thereafter. The City Treasurer shall develop a questionnaire which will answer the following general questions:
 A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policy and objectives.
 A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are treated.
 A description of how the securities are safeguarded (including the settlement processes), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited.
 A description of who may invest in the program, how often, what size deposit and withdrawal are allowed.
 A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings.  Are reserves, retained earnings, etc. utilized by the pool/fund?  A fee schedule, and when and how is it assessed.
 Is the pool/fund eligible for bond proceeds and/or will it accept such proceeds?

RISK MANAGEMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION
Mitigating Credit Risk in the Portfolio
Credit risk is the risk that a security or a portfolio will lose some or all its value due to a real or perceived change in the ability of the issuer to repay its debt. The City will mitigate credit risk by adopting the following strategies:

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 12  The diversification requirements included in the “Authorized Investments” section of this policy are designed to mitigate credit risk in the portfolio.  No more than 5% of the total portfolio may be deposited with or invested in securities issued by any single issuer unless otherwise specified in this policy.
 The City may elect to sell a security prior to its maturity and record a capital gain or loss in order to manage the quality, liquidity or yield of the portfolio in response to market conditions or City’s risk preferences.  If a security owned by the City is downgraded to a level below the requirements of this policy, making the security ineligible for additional purchases, the following steps will be taken:
 Any actions taken related to the downgrade by the investment manager will be communicated to the City Treasurer in a timely manner.
 If a decision is made to retain the security, the credit situation will be monitored and reported to the City Council.

Mitigating Market Risk in the Portfolio
Market risk is the risk that the portfolio value will fluctuate due to changes in the general level of interest rates. The City recognizes that, over time, longer-term portfolios have the potential to achieve higher returns. On the other hand, longer-term portfolios have higher volatility of return. The City will mitigate market risk by providing adequate liquidity for short-term cash needs, and by making longer-term investments only with funds that are not needed for current cash flow purposes.

The City further recognizes that certain types of securities, including variable rate securities, securities with principal paydowns prior to maturity, and securities with embedded options, will affect the market risk profile of the portfolio differently in different interest rate environments. The City, therefore, adopts the following strategies to control and mitigate its exposure to market risk:
 The City will maintain a minimum of six months of budgeted operating expenditures in short term investments to provide sufficient liquidity for expected disbursements.
 The maximum stated final maturity of individual securities in the portfolio will be five (5) years, except as otherwise stated in this policy.  The duration of the portfolio will generally be approximately equal to the duration (typically, plus or minus 20%) of a Market Benchmark, an index selected by the City based on the City’s investment objectives, constraints and risk tolerances.

REPORTING

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 13 According to state law, the City Treasurer shall render an investment report no less than quarterly to the chief executive officer and the legislative body of the City.

POLICY REVIEW
This investment policy shall be reviewed by the City Council at least annually to ensure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, rate of return, and its relevance to current law and financial and economic trends. Amendments and modifications to the policy shall be accepted by the City Council prior to implementation.

Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Kalinowski
City Treasurer
July 1, 20222023

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 14 Glossary of Investment Terms
Agencies. Shorthand market terminology for any obligation issued by a governmentsponsored entity (GSE), or a federally related institution. Most obligations of GSEs are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government. Examples are:

FFCB. The Federal Farm Credit Bank System provides credit and liquidity in the agricultural industry. FFCB issues discount notes and bonds.

FHLB. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLB issues discount notes and bonds.

FHLMC. Like FHLB, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLMC, also called “FreddieMac” issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass-through securities.

FNMA. Like FHLB and FreddieMac, the Federal National Mortgage Association was established to provide credit and liquidity in the housing market. FNMA, also known as “FannieMae,” issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage passthrough securities.

GNMA. The Government National Mortgage Association, known as “GinnieMae,” issues mortgage pass-through securities, which are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US Government.

PEFCO. The Private Export Funding Corporation assists exporters. Obligations of PEFCO are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government.

TVA. The Tennessee Valley Authority provides flood control and power and promotes development in portions of the Tennessee, Ohio, and Mississippi River valleys. TVA currently issues discount notes and bonds.

Asset Backed Securities. Securities supported by pools of installment loans or leases or by pools of revolving lines of credit.

Average Life. In mortgage-related investments, including CMOs, the average time to expected receipt of principal payments, weighted by the amount of principal expected.

Banker’s Acceptance. A money market instrument created to facilitate international trade transactions. It is highly liquid and safe because the risk of the trade transaction is transferred to the bank which “accepts” the obligation to pay the investor.

Benchmark. A comparison security or portfolio. A performance benchmark is a partial market index, which reflects the mix of securities allowed under a specific investment policy.

Broker. A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a transaction for which the broker receives a commission. A broker does not sell securities from their own position.

Callable. A callable security gives the issuer the option to call it from the investor prior to its maturity. The main cause of a call is a decline in interest rates. If interest rates decline, the issuer will likely call its current securities and reissue them at a lower rate of interest.

Certificate of Deposit (CD). A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate.

Certificate of Deposit Account Registry SYSTEM (CDARS). A private placement

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 15 service that allows local agencies to purchase more than $250,000 in CDs from a single financial institution (must be a participating institution of CDARS) while still maintaining FDIC insurance coverage. CDARS is currently the only entity providing this service. CDARS facilitates the trading of deposits between the California institution and other participating institutions in amounts that are less than $250,000 each, so that FDIC coverage is maintained.

Collateral. Securities or cash pledged by a borrower to secure repayment of a loan or repurchase agreement. Also, securities pledged by a financial institution to secure deposits of public monies.

Collateralized Bank Deposit. A bank deposit that is collateralized at least 100% (principal plus interest to maturity). The deposit is collateralized using assets set aside by the issuer such as Treasury securities or other qualified collateral to secure the deposit in excess of the limit covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMO). Classes of bonds that redistribute the cash flows of mortgage securities (and whole loans) to create securities that have different levels of prepayment risk, as compared to the underlying mortgage securities.

Collateralized Time Deposit. Time deposits that are collateralized at least 100% (principal plus interest to maturity). These instruments are collateralized using assets set aside by the issuer such as Treasury securities or other qualified collateral to secure the deposit in excess of the limit covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Commercial Paper. The short-term unsecured debt of corporations.

Coupon. The rate of return at which interest is paid on a bond.

Credit Risk. The risk that principal and/or interest on an investment will not be paid in a timely manner due to changes in the condition of the issuer.

Dealer. A dealer acts as a principal in security transactions, selling securities from and buying securities for their own position.

Debenture. A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer.

Delivery vs. Payment (DVP). A securities industry procedure whereby payment for a security must be made at the time the security is delivered to the purchaser’s agent.

Derivative. Any security that has principal and/or interest payments which are subject to uncertainty (but not for reasons of default or credit risk) as to timing and/or amount, or any security which represents a component of another security which has been separated from other components (“Stripped” coupons and principal). A derivative is also defined as a financial instrument the value of which is totally or partially derived from the value of another instrument, interest rate, or index.

Discount. The difference between the par value of a bond and the cost of the bond, when the cost is below par. Some short-term securities, such as T-bills and banker’s acceptances, are known as discount securities. They sell at a discount from par and return the par value to the investor at maturity without additional interest. Other securities, which have fixed coupons, trade at a discount when the coupon rate is lower than the current market rate for securities of that maturity and/or quality.

Diversification. Dividing investment funds among a variety of investments to avoid excessive exposure to any one source of risk.

Duration. The weighted average time to maturity of a bond where the weights are the

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 16 present values of the future cash flows. Duration measures the price sensitivity of a security to changes interest rates.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is an independent federal agency insuring deposits in U.S. banks and thrifts in the event of bank failures. The FDIC was created in 1933 to maintain public confidence and encourage stability in the financial system through the promotion of sound banking practices.

Federally Insured Time Deposit. A time deposit is an interest-bearing bank deposit account that has a specified date of maturity, such as a certificate of deposit (CD).

These deposits are limited to funds insured in accordance with FDIC insurance deposit limits.

Leverage. Borrowing funds in order to invest in securities that have the potential to pay earnings at a rate higher than the cost of borrowing.

Liquidity. The speed and ease with which an asset can be converted to cash.

Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). A voluntary investment fund open to government entities and certain non-profit organizations in California that is managed by the State Treasurer’s Office.

Local Government Investment Pool. Investment pools that range from the State Treasurer’s Office Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) to county pools, to Joint Powers Authorities (JPAs). These funds are not subject to the same SEC rules applicable to money market mutual funds.

Make Whole Call. A type of call provision on a bond that allows the issuer to pay off the remaining debt early. Unlike a call option, with a make whole call provision, the issuer makes a lump sum payment that equals the net present value (NPV) of future coupon payments that will not be paid because of the call. With this type of call, an investor is compensated, or "made whole."
Margin. The difference between the market value of a security and the loan a broker makes using that security as collateral.

Market Risk. The risk that the value of securities will fluctuate with changes in overall market conditions or interest rates.

Market Value. The price at which a security can be traded.

Maturity. The final date upon which the principal of a security becomes due and payable.

Medium Term Notes. Unsecured, investment-grade senior debt securities of major corporations which are sold in relatively small amounts on either a continuous or an intermittent basis. MTNs are highly flexible debt instruments that can be structured to respond to market opportunities or to investor preferences.

Modified Duration. The percent change in price for a 100-basis point change in yields.

Modified duration is the best single measure of a portfolio’s or security’s exposure to market risk.

Money Market. The market in which short-term debt instruments (T-bills, discount notes, commercial paper, and banker’s acceptances) are issued and traded.

Money Market Mutual Fund. A mutual fund that invests exclusively in short-term securities. Examples of investments in money market funds are certificates of deposit and U.S. Treasury securities. Money market funds attempt to keep their net asset values at $1 per share.

Mortgage Pass-Through Securities. A securitized participation in the interest and

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 17 principal cash flows from a specified pool of mortgages. Principal and interest payments made on the mortgages are passed through to the holder of the security.

Municipal Securities. Securities issued by state and local agencies to finance capital and operating expenses.

Mutual Fund. An entity which pools the funds of investors and invests those funds in a set of securities which is specifically defined in the fund’s prospectus. Mutual funds can be invested in various types of domestic and/or international stocks, bonds, and money market instruments, as set forth in the individual fund’s prospectus. For most large, institutional investors, the costs associated with investing in mutual funds are higher than the investor can obtain through an individually managed portfolio.

Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO).

A credit rating agency that the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States uses for regulatory purposes. Credit rating agencies provide assessments of an investment's risk. The issuers of investments, especially debt securities, pay credit rating agencies to provide them with ratings. The three most prominent NRSROs are Fitch, S&P, and Moody's.

Negotiable Certificate of Deposit (CD). A short-term debt instrument that pays interest and is issued by a bank, savings or federal association, state or federal credit union, or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank. Negotiable CDs are traded in a secondary market.

Primary Dealer. A financial institution (1) that is a trading counterparty with the Federal Reserve in its execution of market operations to carry out U.S. monetary policy, and (2) that participates for statistical reporting purposes in compiling data on activity in the U.S. Government securities market.

Prudent Person (Prudent Investor) Rule. A standard of responsibility which applies to fiduciaries. In California, the rule is stated as “Investments shall be managed with the care, skill, prudence and diligence, under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person, acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters, would use in the conduct of an enterprise of like character and with like aims to accomplish similar purposes.”
Repurchase Agreement. Short-term purchases of securities with a simultaneous agreement to sell the securities back at a higher price. From the seller’s point of view, the same transaction is a reverse repurchase agreement.

Safekeeping. A service to bank customers whereby securities are held by the bank in the customer’s name.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an independent federal government agency responsible for protecting investors, maintaining fair and orderly functioning of securities markets and facilitating capital formation. It was created by Congress in 1934 as the first federal regulator of securities markets. The SEC promotes full public disclosure, protects investors against fraudulent and manipulative practices in the market, and monitors corporate takeover actions in the United States.

Securities and Exchange Commission SEC) Rule 15c3-1. An SEC rule setting capital requirements for brokers and dealers. Under Rule 15c3-1, a broker or dealer must have sufficient liquidity in order to cover the most pressing obligations. This is defined as having a certain amount of liquidity as a percentage of the broker/dealer's total obligations. If the percentage falls below a certain point, the broker or dealer

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 18 may not be allowed to take on new clients and may have restrictions placed on dealings with current client.

Structured Note. A complex, fixed income instrument, which pays interest, based on a formula tied to other interest rates, commodities or indices. Examples include inverse floating rate notes which have coupons that increase when other interest rates are falling, and which fall when other interest rates are rising, and "dual index floaters," which pay interest based on the relationship between two other interest rates - for example, the yield on the ten-year Treasury note minus the Libor rate.

Issuers of such notes lock in a reduced cost of borrowing by purchasing interest rate swap agreements.

Supranational. A Supranational is a multi-national organization whereby member states transcend national boundaries or interests to share in the decision making to promote economic development in the member countries.

Total Rate of Return. A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time. It is the internal rate of return, which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value; it includes interest earnings, realized and unrealized gains, and losses in the portfolio.

U.S. Treasury Obligations. Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Treasuries are considered to have no credit risk and are the benchmark for interest rates on all other securities in the US and overseas. The Treasury issues both discounted securities and fixed coupon notes and bonds.

Treasury Bills. All securities issued with initial maturities of one year or less are issued as discounted instruments and are called Treasury bills. The Treasury currently issues three- and six-month T-bills at regular weekly auctions. It also issues “cash management” bills as needed to smooth out cash flows.

Treasury Notes. All securities issued with initial maturities of two to ten years are called Treasury notes and pay interest semi-annually.

Treasury Bonds. All securities issued with initial maturities greater than ten years are called Treasury bonds. Like Treasury notes, they pay interest semi-annually.

Yield to Maturity. The annualized internal rate of return on an investment which equates the expected cash flows from the investment to its cost.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Redline (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 1 CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

INVESTMENT POLICY
Effective July 1, 2023

INTRODUCTION
The investment policy of the City of Pleasant Hill is based upon State of California Government Code, 53600 et seq. The primary goals of this policy are:

1. To ensure compliance with all State and Local laws governing the investment of monies in the custody of the City Treasurer.

2. To protect the principal monies entrusted to the City Treasurer.

3. To meet the daily cash flow demands of the City.

4. To generate the maximum amount of investment income within the parameters of prudent risk management.

The monies entrusted to the City Treasurer constitute the "Investment Portfolio" referred to in this document.

DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
In the City of Pleasant Hill, management responsibility for investments is herewith delegated to the Elected City Treasurer pursuant to Gov. Code, 53607. The Treasurer shall establish procedures for the operation of an investment program consistent with this investment policy and shall perform investment transactions. The Treasurer may retain the services of an investment advisor. These procedures will include reference to safekeeping, wire transfer agreements, banking service contracts and collateral/depository agreements. The Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken.

The Treasurer shall appoint a Deputy City Treasurer who shall perform the Treasurer's duties in the absence of the Treasurer.

SCOPE
The Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the City Treasury.

This investment policy applies to the investment activities of the City of Pleasant Hill.

The invested assets of the City, with the following three exceptions, shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this policy. The exceptions are the Public Employees Retirement System and Deferred Compensation Funds, which are administered separately by trustees, and Bond proceeds which are invested according to the specifications of the bond indenture according to Government Code 53601(1).

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 2 OBJECTIVES
Objectives have been set in order to achieve the goals of this investment policy. The primary objectives, in priority order, of the City of Pleasant Hill's investment policy are:

A. Safety of Principal
Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City of Pleasant Hill. With each investment transaction the Treasurer shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether these losses are from securities default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk: credit risk and market risk.

Further guidelines for safety of principal shall include:

1. Limiting the Portfolio's exposure to each issue and each issuer of debt.

2. Determining minimum credit requirements for firms that hold City monies.

B. Liquidity
The City of Pleasant Hill's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements, which might be reasonably anticipated.

C. Return on Investment
Return on investment shall be an average market rate of return governed by the objectives of safety and liquidity in accord with prudent investment principles.

MATURITIES
Maturities shall be selected to anticipate cash needs, thereby eliminating the possibility of the need for forced investment liquidation. Cash flow estimates shall be prepared in a prudent manner.

The City will not invest in securities maturing more than five (5) years from the date of trade settlement, unless the City Council has granted authority to make such an investment.

QUALIFIED DEALERS
To the extent practicable, the Treasurer shall endeavor to complete investment transactions using a competitive bid process whenever possible. The City’s Treasurer will determine which financial institutions are authorized to provide investment services to the City. It shall be the City’s policy to purchase securities only from authorized institutions and firms.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 3 The Treasurer shall maintain procedures for establishing a list of authorized broker/dealers and financial institutions which are approved for investment purposes that are selected through a process of due diligence as determined by the City. Due inquiry shall determine whether such authorized broker/dealers, and the individuals covering the City are reputable and trustworthy, knowledgeable and experienced in Public Agency investing and able to meet all of their financial obligations. These institutions may include "primary" dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 15c3-1 (uniform net capital rule).

In accordance with Section 53601.5, institutions eligible to transact investment business with the City include:
 Institutions licensed by the state as a broker-dealer.  Institutions that are members of a federally regulated securities exchange.  Primary government dealers as designated by the Federal Reserve Bank and non-primary government dealers.
 Nationally or state-chartered banks.
 The Federal Reserve Bank.
 Direct issuers of securities eligible for purchase.

Selection of financial institutions and broker/dealers authorized to engage in transactions will be at the sole discretion of the City, except where the City utilizes an external investment adviser in which case the City may rely on the adviser for selection.

All financial institutions and securities dealers who desire to engage in investment transactions with the City of Pleasant Hill shall certify that the supervising officer has reviewed the City's investment policy and agrees to disclose potential conflicts or risks to public funds that might arise out of business transactions between the firm/depository and the City of Pleasant Hill. Employees of any financial institution offering securities or investments to the City of Pleasant Hill shall be trained in the precautions appropriate to public sector investments and shall be required to familiarize themselves with the City's Investment Policy.

The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to all dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation of receipt of this policy shall be considered evidence that the dealer understands the City's investment policies, and intends to offer the City only appropriate investments.

Public deposits will be made only in qualified public depositories as established by State law. Deposits will be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or, to the extent the amount exceeds the insured maximum, will be collateralized in accordance with State law.

Selection of broker/dealers used by an external investment adviser retained by the City

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 4 will be at the sole discretion of the adviser. Where possible, transactions with broker/dealers shall be selected on a competitive basis and their bid or offering prices shall be recorded. If there is no other readily available competitive offering, best efforts will be made to document quotations for comparable or alternative securities. When purchasing original issue instrumentality securities, no competitive offerings will be required as all dealers in the selling group offer those securities at the same original issue price.

DELIVERY, SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES, AND CUSTODY
To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City (including collateral on repurchase agreements), shall be held in the City's name in safekeeping by a third party custodian. Said trust department shall act as agent for the City of Pleasant Hill pursuant to a custody agreement between the bank and the City. All securities shall be received and delivered using standard delivery-versus-payment procedures. The Custodian shall provide safekeeping receipts of all securities held. A monthly report will be received by the City from the custodian listing all securities held in safekeeping with current market data and other information.

The only exceptions to the foregoing shall be depository accounts and securities purchases made with: (i) local government investment pools; (ii) time certificates of deposit, and, (iii) money market mutual funds, since these securities are not deliverable.

COLLATERALIZATION
Certificates of Deposit: The City shall require any commercial bank or savings and loan association to deposit eligible securities with an agency of a depository approved by the State Banking Department to secure any uninsured portion of a Non-Negotiable Certificate of Deposit. The value of eligible securities as defined pursuant to California Government Code, Section 53651, pledged against a Certificate of Deposit shall be equal to 150% of the face value of the CD if the securities are classified as mortgages and 110% of the face value of the CD for all other classes of security.

Collateralization of Bank Deposits: This is the process by which a bank or financial institution pledges securities, or other deposits for the purpose of securing repayment of deposited funds. The City shall require any bank or financial institution to comply with the collateralization criteria defined in California Government Code, Section 53651.

Repurchase Agreements: The City requires that Repurchase Agreements be collateralized only by securities authorized in accordance with California Government Code:
 The securities which collateralize the repurchase agreement shall be priced at Market Value, including any Accrued Interest plus a margin. The Market Value of the securities that underlie a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102% or greater of the funds borrowed against those securities.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 5  Financial institutions shall mark the value of the collateral to market at least monthly and increase or decrease the collateral to satisfy the ratio requirement described above.
 The City shall receive monthly statements of collateral.

ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Investment Officers, i.e., the City Treasurer and the Deputy City Treasurer, shall be governed by the "Code of Ethics" and the "Code of Professional Conduct" of the California Municipal Treasurers Association. The Investment Officers shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which would impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions.

INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Treasurer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the entity are protected from loss, theft or misuse. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management.

PRUDENCE
Pursuant to California Government Code, Section 53600.3, all persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of the City are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the "prudent investor standard", which states:
“…all governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds pursuant to this chapter are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the Agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the Agency. Within the limitations of this section and considering individual investments as part of an overall strategy, investments may be acquired as authorized by law.”
Officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 6 developments.

AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
The City is governed by California Government Code, Sections 53600 et. seq. Within the context of these limitations, the City seeks to further restrict eligible investments to the guidelines listed below. In the event a discrepancy is found between this policy and the Code, the more restrictive parameters will take precedence. Percentage holding limits and minimum credit quality listed in this section apply at the time the security is purchased. Any investment currently held at the time the policy is adopted which does not meet the new policy guidelines can be held until maturity and shall be exempt from the current policy. At the time of the investment’s maturity or liquidation, such funds shall be reinvested only as provided in the current policy.

An appropriate risk level shall be maintained by primarily purchasing securities that are of high quality, liquid, and marketable. The portfolio shall be diversified by security type and institution to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual issuers.

The following investments are authorized:

1. United States Treasury Bills, Bonds, Notes, and other government obligations for which the full faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the City may invest in U.S. Treasuries, provided that the maximum maturity is five (5) years.

2. Obligations issued by Federal Agencies or United States Government-Sponsored Enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the Agency may invest in Federal Agency or Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), provided that:
a) No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in any single Agency/GSE issuer.
b) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years. c) The maximum percent of agency callable securities in the portfolio will be 20%.

3. Municipal securities, including obligations of the City, the State of California and any local agency within the State of California, provided that:
a) The securities are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”).
b) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 7 c) No more than 30% of the portfolio may be in Municipal Securities. d) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

4. Municipal securities (Registered Treasury Notes or Bonds) of any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California:
a) The securities are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
b) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. c) No more than 30% of the portfolio may be in Municipal Securities. d) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

5. Banker’s Acceptances, provided that:
a) They are issued by institutions which have short-term debt obligations rated “A-1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO; or long-term debt obligations which are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
b) No more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Banker’s Acceptances.
c) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. d) The maximum maturity does not exceed 180 days.

6. Commercial Paper, provided that the securities are issued by an entity that meets all of the following conditions in either paragraph (a) or (b) and other requirements specified below:
a) Securities issued by corporations:
o A corporation organized and operating in the United States with assets more than $500 million.
o The securities are rated “A-1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
o If the issuer has other debt obligations, they must be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
b) Securities issued by other entities:
o The issuer is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company. o The securities must have program-wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, overcollateralization, letters of credit, or a surety bond.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 8 o The securities are rated “A-1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
 No more than 10% of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer.
 No more than 25% of the City’s investment assets under management may be invested in Commercial Paper.
 No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer.  The maximum maturity does not exceed 270 days.

7. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (NCDs), issued by a nationally or statechartered bank, a savings association or a federal association, a state or federal credit union, or by a federally licensed or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank, provided that:
a) The amount of the NCD insured up to the FDIC limit does not require any credit ratings.
b) Any amount above the FDIC insured limit must be issued by institutions which have short-term debt obligations rated “A-1” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO; or long-term obligations rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO. c) No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in NCDs. d) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. e) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

8. Federally Insured Time Deposits (Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit) in state or federally chartered banks, savings and loans, or credit unions, provided that:
a) The amount per institution is limited to the maximum covered under federal insurance.
b) No more than 20% of the portfolio will be invested in a combination of federally insured and collateralized time deposits.
c) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

9. Collateralized Time Deposits (Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit) in state or federally chartered banks, savings and loans, or credit unions in excess of insured amounts which are fully collateralized with securities in accordance with California law, provided that:
d) No more than 20% of the portfolio will be invested in a combination of federally insured and collateralized time deposits.
e) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

10. Collateralized Bank Deposits. City’s deposits with financial institutions will be collateralized with pledged securities per California Government Code, Section

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 9 53651. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the City may invest in collateralized bank deposits.

11. Repurchase Agreements collateralized with securities authorized under California Government Code, maintained at a level of at least 102% of the market value of the Repurchase Agreement. There are no limits on the dollar amount or percentage that the City may invest, provided that:
a) Securities used as collateral for Repurchase Agreements will be delivered to an acceptable third party custodian.
b) Repurchase Agreements are subject to a Master Repurchase Agreement between the City and the provider of the repurchase agreement. The Master Repurchase Agreement will be substantially in the form developed by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA). c) The maximum maturity does not exceed one (1) year.

12. Medium Term Corporate Notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States, provided that:
a) The securities are rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by at least one NRSRO.
b) No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in medium term notes.
c) No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. d) The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

13. Money Market Mutual Funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and issued by diversified management companies and meet either of the following criteria:
a) Have attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two (2) NRSROs; or
b) Have retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years’ experience managing money market mutual funds with assets under management in excess of $500 million.
 No more than 20% of the total portfolio may be invested in Money Market Mutual Funds.

14. Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) - pool established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies, up to the maximum amount permitted by LAIF.

15. Supranational obligations, provided that:

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 10  Issues are US dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank.
 The securities are rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO.
 No more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in these securities.
 No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer.  The maximum maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

16. Asset-Backed, Mortgage-Backed, Mortgage Pass-Through Securities, and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations from issuers not defined in sections 1 and 2 of the Authorized Investments section of this policy, provided that:
 The securities are rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO.
 No more than 20% of the total portfolio may be invested in these securities.
 No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in any single AssetBacked or Commercial Mortgage security issuer.  The maximum legal final maturity does not exceed five (5) years.

INELIGIBLE INVESTMENTS
 State law notwithstanding, any investments not specifically described herein are prohibited, including, but not limited to futures and options.  In accordance with Government Code, Section 53601.6, investment in inverse floaters, range notes, or mortgage derived interest-only strips is prohibited.
 Investment in any security that could result in a zero interest accrual if held to maturity is prohibited Under a provision sunsetting on January 1, 2026, securities backed by the U.S. Government that could result in a zero- or negative-interest accrual if held to maturity are permitted.  Trading securities for the sole purpose of speculating on the future direction of interest rates is prohibited.
 Purchasing or selling securities on margin is prohibited.  The use of reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending or any other form of borrowing or leverage is prohibited.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 11  The purchase of foreign currency denominated securities is prohibited.  Agencies that are not Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIB) as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission are prohibited from purchasing Private Placement Securities. The SEC defines a QIB as having at least $100,000,000 in securities owned and invested.

INVESTMENT POOLS/MUTUAL FUNDS
The City shall conduct a thorough investigation of any pool or mutual fund prior to making an investment, and on a continual basis thereafter. The City Treasurer shall develop a questionnaire which will answer the following general questions:
 A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policy and objectives.
 A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are treated.
 A description of how the securities are safeguarded (including the settlement processes), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited.
 A description of who may invest in the program, how often, what size deposit and withdrawal are allowed.
 A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings.  Are reserves, retained earnings, etc. utilized by the pool/fund?  A fee schedule, and when and how is it assessed.
 Is the pool/fund eligible for bond proceeds and/or will it accept such proceeds?

RISK MANAGEMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION
Mitigating Credit Risk in the Portfolio
Credit risk is the risk that a security or a portfolio will lose some or all its value due to a real or perceived change in the ability of the issuer to repay its debt. The City will mitigate credit risk by adopting the following strategies:
 The diversification requirements included in the “Authorized Investments” section of this policy are designed to mitigate credit risk in the portfolio.  No more than 5% of the total portfolio may be deposited with or invested in securities issued by any single issuer unless otherwise specified in this policy.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 12  The City may elect to sell a security prior to its maturity and record a capital gain or loss in order to manage the quality, liquidity or yield of the portfolio in response to market conditions or City’s risk preferences.  If a security owned by the City is downgraded to a level below the requirements of this policy, making the security ineligible for additional purchases, the following steps will be taken:
 Any actions taken related to the downgrade by the investment manager will be communicated to the City Treasurer in a timely manner.
 If a decision is made to retain the security, the credit situation will be monitored and reported to the City Council.

Mitigating Market Risk in the Portfolio
Market risk is the risk that the portfolio value will fluctuate due to changes in the general level of interest rates. The City recognizes that, over time, longer-term portfolios have the potential to achieve higher returns. On the other hand, longer-term portfolios have higher volatility of return. The City will mitigate market risk by providing adequate liquidity for short-term cash needs, and by making longer-term investments only with funds that are not needed for current cash flow purposes.

The City further recognizes that certain types of securities, including variable rate securities, securities with principal paydowns prior to maturity, and securities with embedded options, will affect the market risk profile of the portfolio differently in different interest rate environments. The City, therefore, adopts the following strategies to control and mitigate its exposure to market risk:
 The City will maintain a minimum of six months of budgeted operating expenditures in short term investments to provide sufficient liquidity for expected disbursements.
 The maximum stated final maturity of individual securities in the portfolio will be five (5) years, except as otherwise stated in this policy.  The duration of the portfolio will generally be approximately equal to the duration (typically, plus or minus 20%) of a Market Benchmark, an index selected by the City based on the City’s investment objectives, constraints and risk tolerances.

REPORTING
According to state law, the City Treasurer shall render an investment report no less than quarterly to the chief executive officer and the legislative body of the City.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 13 POLICY REVIEW
This investment policy shall be reviewed by the City Council at least annually to ensure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, rate of return, and its relevance to current law and financial and economic trends. Amendments and modifications to the policy shall be accepted by the City Council prior to implementation.

Respectfully submitted,
Andrew Kalinowski
City Treasurer
July 1, 2023

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 14 Glossary of Investment Terms
Agencies. Shorthand market terminology for any obligation issued by a governmentsponsored entity (GSE), or a federally related institution. Most obligations of GSEs are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government. Examples are:

FFCB. The Federal Farm Credit Bank System provides credit and liquidity in the agricultural industry. FFCB issues discount notes and bonds.

FHLB. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLB issues discount notes and bonds.

FHLMC. Like FHLB, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLMC, also called “FreddieMac” issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass-through securities.

FNMA. Like FHLB and FreddieMac, the Federal National Mortgage Association was established to provide credit and liquidity in the housing market. FNMA, also known as “FannieMae,” issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage passthrough securities.

GNMA. The Government National Mortgage Association, known as “GinnieMae,” issues mortgage pass-through securities, which are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US Government.

PEFCO. The Private Export Funding Corporation assists exporters. Obligations of PEFCO are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government.

TVA. The Tennessee Valley Authority provides flood control and power and promotes development in portions of the Tennessee, Ohio, and Mississippi River valleys. TVA currently issues discount notes and bonds.

Asset Backed Securities. Securities supported by pools of installment loans or leases or by pools of revolving lines of credit.

Average Life. In mortgage-related investments, including CMOs, the average time to expected receipt of principal payments, weighted by the amount of principal expected.

Banker’s Acceptance. A money market instrument created to facilitate international trade transactions. It is highly liquid and safe because the risk of the trade transaction is transferred to the bank which “accepts” the obligation to pay the investor.

Benchmark. A comparison security or portfolio. A performance benchmark is a partial market index, which reflects the mix of securities allowed under a specific investment policy.

Broker. A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a transaction for which the broker receives a commission. A broker does not sell securities from their own position.

Callable. A callable security gives the issuer the option to call it from the investor prior to its maturity. The main cause of a call is a decline in interest rates. If interest rates decline, the issuer will likely call its current securities and reissue them at a lower rate of interest.

Certificate of Deposit (CD). A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate.

Certificate of Deposit Account Registry SYSTEM (CDARS). A private placement

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 15 service that allows local agencies to purchase more than $250,000 in CDs from a single financial institution (must be a participating institution of CDARS) while still maintaining FDIC insurance coverage. CDARS is currently the only entity providing this service. CDARS facilitates the trading of deposits between the California institution and other participating institutions in amounts that are less than $250,000 each, so that FDIC coverage is maintained.

Collateral. Securities or cash pledged by a borrower to secure repayment of a loan or repurchase agreement. Also, securities pledged by a financial institution to secure deposits of public monies.

Collateralized Bank Deposit. A bank deposit that is collateralized at least 100% (principal plus interest to maturity). The deposit is collateralized using assets set aside by the issuer such as Treasury securities or other qualified collateral to secure the deposit in excess of the limit covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMO). Classes of bonds that redistribute the cash flows of mortgage securities (and whole loans) to create securities that have different levels of prepayment risk, as compared to the underlying mortgage securities.

Collateralized Time Deposit. Time deposits that are collateralized at least 100% (principal plus interest to maturity). These instruments are collateralized using assets set aside by the issuer such as Treasury securities or other qualified collateral to secure the deposit in excess of the limit covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Commercial Paper. The short-term unsecured debt of corporations.

Coupon. The rate of return at which interest is paid on a bond.

Credit Risk. The risk that principal and/or interest on an investment will not be paid in a timely manner due to changes in the condition of the issuer.

Dealer. A dealer acts as a principal in security transactions, selling securities from and buying securities for their own position.

Debenture. A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer.

Delivery vs. Payment (DVP). A securities industry procedure whereby payment for a security must be made at the time the security is delivered to the purchaser’s agent.

Derivative. Any security that has principal and/or interest payments which are subject to uncertainty (but not for reasons of default or credit risk) as to timing and/or amount, or any security which represents a component of another security which has been separated from other components (“Stripped” coupons and principal). A derivative is also defined as a financial instrument the value of which is totally or partially derived from the value of another instrument, interest rate, or index.

Discount. The difference between the par value of a bond and the cost of the bond, when the cost is below par. Some short-term securities, such as T-bills and banker’s acceptances, are known as discount securities. They sell at a discount from par and return the par value to the investor at maturity without additional interest. Other securities, which have fixed coupons, trade at a discount when the coupon rate is lower than the current market rate for securities of that maturity and/or quality.

Diversification. Dividing investment funds among a variety of investments to avoid excessive exposure to any one source of risk.

Duration. The weighted average time to maturity of a bond where the weights are the

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 16 present values of the future cash flows. Duration measures the price sensitivity of a security to changes interest rates.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is an independent federal agency insuring deposits in U.S. banks and thrifts in the event of bank failures. The FDIC was created in 1933 to maintain public confidence and encourage stability in the financial system through the promotion of sound banking practices.

Federally Insured Time Deposit. A time deposit is an interest-bearing bank deposit account that has a specified date of maturity, such as a certificate of deposit (CD).

These deposits are limited to funds insured in accordance with FDIC insurance deposit limits.

Leverage. Borrowing funds in order to invest in securities that have the potential to pay earnings at a rate higher than the cost of borrowing.

Liquidity. The speed and ease with which an asset can be converted to cash.

Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). A voluntary investment fund open to government entities and certain non-profit organizations in California that is managed by the State Treasurer’s Office.

Local Government Investment Pool. Investment pools that range from the State Treasurer’s Office Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) to county pools, to Joint Powers Authorities (JPAs). These funds are not subject to the same SEC rules applicable to money market mutual funds.

Make Whole Call. A type of call provision on a bond that allows the issuer to pay off the remaining debt early. Unlike a call option, with a make whole call provision, the issuer makes a lump sum payment that equals the net present value (NPV) of future coupon payments that will not be paid because of the call. With this type of call, an investor is compensated, or "made whole."
Margin. The difference between the market value of a security and the loan a broker makes using that security as collateral.

Market Risk. The risk that the value of securities will fluctuate with changes in overall market conditions or interest rates.

Market Value. The price at which a security can be traded.

Maturity. The final date upon which the principal of a security becomes due and payable.

Medium Term Notes. Unsecured, investment-grade senior debt securities of major corporations which are sold in relatively small amounts on either a continuous or an intermittent basis. MTNs are highly flexible debt instruments that can be structured to respond to market opportunities or to investor preferences.

Modified Duration. The percent change in price for a 100-basis point change in yields.

Modified duration is the best single measure of a portfolio’s or security’s exposure to market risk.

Money Market. The market in which short-term debt instruments (T-bills, discount notes, commercial paper, and banker’s acceptances) are issued and traded.

Money Market Mutual Fund. A mutual fund that invests exclusively in short-term securities. Examples of investments in money market funds are certificates of deposit and U.S. Treasury securities. Money market funds attempt to keep their net asset values at $1 per share.

Mortgage Pass-Through Securities. A securitized participation in the interest and

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 17 principal cash flows from a specified pool of mortgages. Principal and interest payments made on the mortgages are passed through to the holder of the security.

Municipal Securities. Securities issued by state and local agencies to finance capital and operating expenses.

Mutual Fund. An entity which pools the funds of investors and invests those funds in a set of securities which is specifically defined in the fund’s prospectus. Mutual funds can be invested in various types of domestic and/or international stocks, bonds, and money market instruments, as set forth in the individual fund’s prospectus. For most large, institutional investors, the costs associated with investing in mutual funds are higher than the investor can obtain through an individually managed portfolio.

Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO).

A credit rating agency that the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States uses for regulatory purposes. Credit rating agencies provide assessments of an investment's risk. The issuers of investments, especially debt securities, pay credit rating agencies to provide them with ratings. The three most prominent NRSROs are Fitch, S&P, and Moody's.

Negotiable Certificate of Deposit (CD). A short-term debt instrument that pays interest and is issued by a bank, savings or federal association, state or federal credit union, or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank. Negotiable CDs are traded in a secondary market.

Primary Dealer. A financial institution (1) that is a trading counterparty with the Federal Reserve in its execution of market operations to carry out U.S. monetary policy, and (2) that participates for statistical reporting purposes in compiling data on activity in the U.S. Government securities market.

Prudent Person (Prudent Investor) Rule. A standard of responsibility which applies to fiduciaries. In California, the rule is stated as “Investments shall be managed with the care, skill, prudence and diligence, under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person, acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters, would use in the conduct of an enterprise of like character and with like aims to accomplish similar purposes.”
Repurchase Agreement. Short-term purchases of securities with a simultaneous agreement to sell the securities back at a higher price. From the seller’s point of view, the same transaction is a reverse repurchase agreement.

Safekeeping. A service to bank customers whereby securities are held by the bank in the customer’s name.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an independent federal government agency responsible for protecting investors, maintaining fair and orderly functioning of securities markets and facilitating capital formation. It was created by Congress in 1934 as the first federal regulator of securities markets. The SEC promotes full public disclosure, protects investors against fraudulent and manipulative practices in the market, and monitors corporate takeover actions in the United States.

Securities and Exchange Commission SEC) Rule 15c3-1. An SEC rule setting capital requirements for brokers and dealers. Under Rule 15c3-1, a broker or dealer must have sufficient liquidity in order to cover the most pressing obligations. This is defined as having a certain amount of liquidity as a percentage of the broker/dealer's total obligations. If the percentage falls below a certain point, the broker or dealer

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023) 18 may not be allowed to take on new clients and may have restrictions placed on dealings with current client.

Structured Note. A complex, fixed income instrument, which pays interest, based on a formula tied to other interest rates, commodities or indices. Examples include inverse floating rate notes which have coupons that increase when other interest rates are falling, and which fall when other interest rates are rising, and "dual index floaters," which pay interest based on the relationship between two other interest rates - for example, the yield on the ten-year Treasury note minus the Libor rate.

Issuers of such notes lock in a reduced cost of borrowing by purchasing interest rate swap agreements.

Supranational. A Supranational is a multi-national organization whereby member states transcend national boundaries or interests to share in the decision making to promote economic development in the member countries.

Total Rate of Return. A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time. It is the internal rate of return, which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value; it includes interest earnings, realized and unrealized gains, and losses in the portfolio.

U.S. Treasury Obligations. Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Treasuries are considered to have no credit risk and are the benchmark for interest rates on all other securities in the US and overseas. The Treasury issues both discounted securities and fixed coupon notes and bonds.

Treasury Bills. All securities issued with initial maturities of one year or less are issued as discounted instruments and are called Treasury bills. The Treasury currently issues three- and six-month T-bills at regular weekly auctions. It also issues “cash management” bills as needed to smooth out cash flows.

Treasury Notes. All securities issued with initial maturities of two to ten years are called Treasury notes and pay interest semi-annually.

Treasury Bonds. All securities issued with initial maturities greater than ten years are called Treasury bonds. Like Treasury notes, they pay interest semi-annually.

Yield to Maturity. The annualized internal rate of return on an investment which equates the expected cash flows from the investment to its cost.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Pleasant Hill Investment Policy 2023 - Clean (Annual Investment Policy 2023)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 TO IDENTIFY THE CONTRA COSTA

BOULEVARD (HARRIET DRIVE TO VIKING DRIVE) IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
FUNDS OF SENATE BILL 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017

SYNOPSIS
The City of Pleasant Hill will receive an estimated $853,095 in new Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds in Fiscal Year 2023/24 from Senate Bill 1 (SB1). In order to be eligible for the funds, the City must identify and adopt by resolution all projects proposed to be funded with SB1 funds. Staff is recommending the City appropriate these SB1 funds for the Contra Costa Boulevard (Harriet Drive to Viking Drive) Improvement Project as identified in the FY 2022/2027 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as it is high priority project for the City.

DISCUSSION
Background
On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed SB1, which is known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. To address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation and critical safety needs on state highways, local streets and the road system, SB1 generates funds by: increasing the per gallon fuel excise taxes; increasing diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration fees; and provides for inflationary adjustments to tax rates in future years.

Since November 1, 2017, the State Controller (Controller) deposited various portions of this new funding into the RMRA. A percentage of this new RMRA funding is apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2032(h) for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on local streets and the roads system. The City has received approximately $2.8 million dollars between FY 2017/2018 and FY 2022/2023, and these funds were allocated to the Pleasant Hill Road (Gregory Lane to Taylor Boulevard) Improvement Project, the 2019 Street Resurfacing Project, the 2021 Street Resurfacing Project, and the 2022 Street Resurfacing Project.

9.4 Packet Pg. 99
In order to be eligible for annual RMRA funding, statute requires cities and counties to provide basic annual RMRA project reporting to the California Transportation Commission (Commission). Prior to receiving an apportionment of RMRA funds from the Controller this fiscal year, the City must submit to the Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds by the July 1, 2023 deadline. All projects proposed to receive funding must be included in an approved or amended budget that is adopted by the City Council at a regular public meeting. The list of projects must include a description, location, proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement.

Additional requirements for funding eligibility include public outreach and use of a Pavement Management System to develop the SB1 project list, ensuring that SB1 funds are being utilized on high priority, cost effective projects that meet the City’s pavement maintenance needs. The City meets both of these requirements.

RMRA funds may be used for: road maintenance and rehabilitation projects; safety improvement projects; Complete Streets projects and components (including pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and stormwater capture projects); and traffic control projects.

Analysis
The Contra Costa Boulevard (Harriet Drive to Viking Drive) Improvement Project is an approved project in the FY 2022-2027 CIP, which was adopted by Resolution 59-22 on July 11, 2022 at the City Council’s regularly scheduled meeting, and is an ideal candidate that meets the criteria for expenditure of SB1 funds. The project is currently out to bid, and construction is anticipated to begin in August 2023 and all project work is expected to be completed by June 2024.

The Contra Costa Boulevard (Harriet Drive to Viking Drive) Improvement Project will provide needed “complete street” improvements along Contra Costa Boulevard, between Harriet Drive and Viking Drive. These improvements will include a new intersection geometry at Taylor Boulevard, a new traffic signal at Contra Costa Boulevard and Alan Drive, new LED street lighting, bicycle lanes, ADA upgrades and pavement rehabilitation.

Although these funds may not be expended entirely during the fiscal year, they have no maturity timeline and may be rolled over and expended in upcoming years.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Pleasant Hill will receive an estimated $853,095 in new RMRA funds in Fiscal Year 2023/2024 from SB1.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The

9.4 Packet Pg. 100
agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt Resolution.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Not adopting the attached resolution by July 1, 2023, will result in the City’s loss of $853,095 in eligible RMRA funds. The City Council may choose to fund other projects that meet the RMRA criteria
ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Prepared by: Ann James, Public Works Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

9.4 Packet Pg. 101
RESOLUTION NO. -23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

TO IDENTIFY THE CONTRA COSTA BOULEVARD (HARRIET DRIVE TO VIKING

DRIVE) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024 FUNDS OF SENATE BILL 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the road maintenance, rehabilitation and critical safety needs on both the state highway and local streets and funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of Pleasant Hill are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill must identify by resolution all projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) created by SB1. All projects proposed to receive funding must be included in an approved or amended budget that is adopted by the City Council at a regular public meeting. The list of projects must include a description, a location, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
.

WHEREAS, prior to receiving an apportionment of RMRA funds from the Controller this fiscal year, the City must submit to the Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds by July 1, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill will receive an estimated $853,095 in RMRA funding for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 from SB1; and
WHEREAS, this is the seventh year in which the City of Pleasant Hill is receiving SB1 funding and will enable the City of Pleasant Hill to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the travelling public that would have otherwise been possible without SB1; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill has undergone extensive community outreach to ensure public input into our community’s project list; and WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB1 project to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost effective projects that also meet the communities priorities for road maintenance; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB1 will help the City of Pleasant Hill fund the Contra Costa Boulevard (Harriet Drive to Viking Drive) as identified as a desired project in the FY 2022-2027 CIP; and will provide necessary roadway, bicycle and pedestrian, and ADA improvements; and

9.4.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (SB1 Contra Costa Blvd (Harriet Drive to Viking Drive)) WHEREAS, 2021 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City of Pleasant Hill’s streets are in a good/at-risk condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets into a good/very good condition; and
WHEREAS, the SB1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with an emphasis on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting edge technology, materials and practices will provide safe, multimodal options and increase mobility and access to our travelling public.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. On July 11, 2022, at its regularly scheduled meeting, the City Council approved the 2022/2027 Capital Improvement Project by Resolution 59-22 to incorporate approximately $853,095 in FY 2023/2023 in RMRA funds from SB1 to fund in-part the Contra Costa Boulevard (Harriet Drive to Viking Drive) Project.

3. The Contra Costa Boulevard (Harriet Drive to Viking Drive) Project is expected to be begin construction in August 2023 and be completed in June 2024, and said improvements will have a minimal useful life of 15 years.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5
th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

9.4.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (SB1 Contra Costa Blvd (Harriet Drive to Viking Drive))

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SECOND AMENDMENT TO A DESIGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ALTA PLANNING +
DESIGN, INC., FOR THE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 03-20

SYNOPSIS
The purpose of this item is to consider adopting a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Second Amendment (Exhibit A) to the Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design, Inc. (Alta) to update and finalize the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Project No. 03-20. Alta will perform planning and design services to address comments received on the General Plan’s Circulation Element and comments from the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Town Hall discussion held on April 18, 2023. Additional services will include narrative on corridor designations, transit and parking operations, and expanding the section within the plan on Safe Routes to Schools.

DISCUSSION
Background
The City executed a Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta in February 2020 (Exhibit B) to prepare a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The Master Plan provides a policy framework for planning, conceptual design, project prioritization, implementation, and funding strategies. In April 2020, Alta conducted public outreach to stakeholders to receive public comments and input. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan was previously reviewed by the Traffic Safety Commission in September 2020 for consistency with the plan’s vision statement, the document’s technical accuracy, and implementation of the bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the City. The Planning Commission reviewed the document in January 2023 and provided feedback and suggested updates on several sections of the plan. A Town Hall discussion led by Councilmembers Noack and Vinson was held on April 18, 2023, specifically related to the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. As a result of the feedback received, Alta will revise the Plan to reflect the comments and direction provided and align the document with newly adopted General Plan 2040 initiatives.

9.5 Packet Pg. 104
Analysis
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update. As a policy document, the Master Plan requires:
1) further updates of technical data; 2) revisions to reflect modifications made to the City’s General Plan 2040 Circulation Element; and 3) verification of consistency between the Master Plan and General Plan documents. Alta will perform the planning and design services tasks, as shown in Exhibit C.

CEQA Exemption. Additionally, Senate Bill 922 (SB 922) was signed into law recently by the governor. The new law allows the City to exempt the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan from further environmental review otherwise required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). SB 922 became effective January 1, 2023, meaning the City may adopt the Master Plan without delay attributable to additional environmental review.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Alta proposal is for a not-to-exceed amount of $10,000 on a time and material basis. The proposal is complete and acceptable and it is reasonable to include a contingency of 20 percent ($2,000), thereby increasing the total project budget by $12,000. The original Agreement with Alta was in the amount of $57,200. The First Amendment to the original Agreement required an increase of $21,600 above the original cost. The Second Amendment will increase the contract total amount by $12,000 to a new not-to-exceed total of $90,800. There are sufficient gas tax funds for the project budget in the Traffic Calming Program (IP-1) that was approved by City Council in July 2022, as shown in Exhibit D.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends adopting the proposed resolution and authorizing the Amendment.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Do not adopt the proposed resolution to authorize the Amendment and provide further direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Exhibit A. Second Amendment
Exhibit B. Agreement
Exhibit C. Consultant Proposal
Exhibit D. CIP Traffic Calming Program (IP-1)

9.5 Packet Pg. 105
Prepared and Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

9.5 Packet Pg. 106
RESOLUTION NO. -23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SECOND AMENDMENT

TO A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ALTA
PLANNING + DESIGN, INC. FOR THE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
MASTER PLAN PROJECT NO. 03-20
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant entered into an Agreement for Design Professional Services with Alta Planning + Design, Inc. on February 13, 2020; and WHEREAS, in April 2020, the Consultant conducted public outreach to stakeholders to receive public comments and input, and subsequently prepared a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Draft Report; and
WHEREAS, the Master Plan requires further updates, including technical data, and edits to reflect modifications made to the City’s General Plan Circulation Element and additional direction received through additional public outreach, and to ensure consistency between the Master Plan and the General Plan 2040 documents; and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 922 allows the City to exempt the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan from further environmental review otherwise required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); SB 922 became effective January 1, 2023, meaning the City may adopt the Master Plan without delay attributable to additional environmental review; and WHEREAS, City staff is prepared to move forward with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and requires the Consultant to perform additional tasks to update and finalize the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and reflect public comments received, including those provided at the Town Hall meeting on April 18, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Consultant will provide additional planning and design services to include recent narrative on corridor designations, transit and parking operations, and expanding the section within the Master Plan on Safe Routes to Schools.

WHEREAS, Alta Planning + Design, Inc. has submitted a proposal that is complete and acceptable to the City; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant’s proposal is for an amount not-to-exceed $10,000 on a time and material basis. It is reasonable to include a 20 percent contingency of $2,000, thereby increasing the total project budget by $12,000; this will increase the total contract amount from $78,800 to $90,800, as described in the Second Amendment; and WHEREAS, funds are available to support this expenditure within the project budget as identified in the FY 2022-23 Traffic Calming Program (IP-1), Account No. 12-5310 (531) that was approved by City Council in July 2022.

9.5.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that: 1) the City Council has determined that the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Senate Bill 922 effective January 1, 2023; and 2) the City Council adopts this Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design, Inc., for $10,000, plus an additional 20 percent contingency of $2,000, for a total contract amount not to exceed $90,800.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5
th day of June 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

9.5.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN, INC. FOR
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN, PROJECT NO. 03-20
This Second Amendment to the Agreement for Design Professional Services for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Project No. 03-20 is entered into as of ___________, 2023 between the City of Pleasant Hill (“City”) and Alta Planning + Design, Inc. (“Consultant”).

AMENDMENT

1. Scope of Services. The scope of services is amended to add the following additional services to the Agreement dated February 13, 2020:

Consultant shall perform the Work Tasks described on the Consultant proposal set forth in Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by reference. Consultant shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A, subject to the direction of the City through its staff that it may provide from time to time.

2. Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until all additional work is approved by the City. All such work shall be completed no later than June 30, 2024.

3. Budget. The project budget is amended to add an additional amount of $10,000 over the original amount of $57,200 per the Agreement dated February 13, 2020 and the First Amendment amount of $21,600 dated November 7, 2022, for a total amount not to exceed $88,800.00:

Additional funds are authorized for $10,000 for the additional services in accordance with the Consultant proposal set forth in Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by reference. Funds are available for the project budget in the FY 2022-23 Traffic Calming Improvement Program (IP-1), Account No. 12-5310 (531) that was approved by City Council in July 2022.

4. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. [Signatures on Following Page]

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Exhibit A - Second Amendment (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the date first written above.

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL: Alta Planning + Design, Inc.:

By:

June Catalano, City Manager
Title:

Business License No.:

ATTEST:

City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Janet E. Coleson, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit A – Alta Planning & Design, Inc. Proposal & Rate Sheet CEO
38650

9.5.b
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Exhibit A - Second Amendment (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

EXHIBIT B

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

9.5.c
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Exhibit B. Agreement (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design)

MEMORANDUM
304 12th Street, Suite 2A
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 540-5008
www.altaplanning.com
Alta Planning + Design | 1
To: Jaime Rodriguez, City of Pleasant Hill
From: Brett Hondorp
Date: May 1, 2023
Re: Additional Scope and Fee – Final Adoption Support for Pleasant Hill Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan This provides a scope and fee estimate for final adoption support for the Pleasant Hill Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.

Work Tasks
Add Study Corridor Designation to Recommended Network
Adjust figures 5-1 and 6-1 to show Study Corridor overlay to the follow roadways:
- Taylor Blvd
- Gregory Ln/Grayson Rd
- Oak Park Blvd
- Geary Rd
- Contra Costa Blvd
- Morello Ave
- Monument Blvd
- Buskirk Ave
Include narrative paragraph in Chapters 5 and 6 describing intent of study corridor designation, need for additional corridor specific outreach and analysis including vehicular, transit and parking operations prior to finalizing any design.

Additional Safe Routes to School Discussion
Expand section 8.2.1 regarding Safe Routes to School. Edits will include additional discussion of how treatments such as Class IIIB on select streets can help support SR2S solutions. Include a sample Walk n Roll Map of a street and include discussion on how the suggested routes align with the proposed network. Recommendation will note the need for subsequent Intersection Improvement Maps to expand BPMP implementation
General Plan Goals & Objectives
Update Chapter 2 to align with updated General Plan initiatives following the bullet points provided by city Community Engagement
An Alta representative will up to three (3) additional in-person outreach meetings. Includes travel and meeting time as well as preparation time for presentational materials.

EXHIBIT C 9.5.d
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Exhibit C. Consultant Proposal (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design) 2 | Alta Planning + Design
Additional Document Revisions As Needed
With the city’s approval and direction Alta will revise maps and narrative based on comments received during additional outreach, up to our time & materials budget limit.

Fee
Alta will complete this scope on a Time and Materials basis for a not-to-exceed fee of $10,000. We will bill staff time at standard rates shown on the attached Rate Schedule.

Schedule
All work should be completed by June 2024.

9.5.d
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Exhibit C. Consultant Proposal (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design) Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

Bill Rates - 2023
Labor Category RATE Typical Classifications Included in Rate Labor Category 1 $380.00 Executive Principal
Labor Category 2 $350.00 Executive Principal
Labor Category 3 $320.00 Principal, Executive Principal Labor Category 4 $290.00 Principal, Executive Principal Labor Category 5 $270.00 Sr. Associate, Principal, Executive Principal Labor Category 6 $250.00 Sr. Associate, Principal
Labor Category 7 $230.00 Leader, Sr. Associate, Principal Labor Category 8 $210.00 Associate II, Sr. Associate, Director, Principal Labor Category 9 $195.00 Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate Labor Category 10 $180.00 Level III, Associate I, Associate II, Sr. Associate Labor Category 11 $165.00 Level III, Associate I, Associate II Labor Category 12 $150.00 Level III, Associate I, Associate II Labor Category 13 $140.00 Level II, Level III, Associate I Labor Category 14 $130.00 Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 15 $120.00 Level I, Level II, Level III
Labor Category 16 $110.00 Administration
Labor Category 17 $ 90.00 Intern
Rates are presented in US Dollars (US$) and are subject to change at any time.

Subconsultants and reimbursable expenses will be charged at cost + 10% markup.

Mileage will be charged at the provisional standard rate.

In-house reproductions will be charged as follows:

Color copies $0.65/ page
Black and white copies $0.20/page
24” x 36” large format plot $17.50/sheet
36” x 48” large format plot $32.50/sheet

9.5.d
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Exhibit C. Consultant Proposal (Second Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Alta Planning + Design) CITY OF PLEASANT HILL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 2022/2027 PROJECT: TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMPROJECT PROPOSED BY: Engineering Division PROJECT MANAGER: Engineering Division PROJECT CLASSIFICATION: Citywide Improvement Programs PROJECT LOCATION: CitywidePROJECT BEGIN: July 2022 PROJECT COMPLETE: June 2027 Account 12 - 5310 (531) PROJECT STATUS NEW X CONTINUING PROJECT SCOPE OF SERVICES FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 TOTALS (1190) Design IS A CONCEPTUAL (0100) Eng Staff $4,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $12,000(4225) Project Admin. PLAN AVAILABLE YES X NO(1390) Construction $96,000 $98,000 $98,000 $98,000 $98,000 $488,000(1145) C. Management LEAD AGENCY X CITY OTHERTOTAL $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000

PROJECT TRAFFIC
FUNDING SOURCE FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 TOTALS SAFETY PRIORITY CRITICAL N/A x CASE BY (12) Gas Tax $85,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $485,000 CASE BASIS Other* $15,000 IS RIGHT OF WAY

REQUIRED YES NO X NOT

EXPECTED
TOTAL $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE IMPACT FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 TOTALS COST IMPACT x INCREASE N/A DECREASE New traffic calming devices will result in the increase of on-going maintenance costs.

PROJECT BENEFIT: To address speeding concerns as determined by the Traffic Safety Commission and City Council. * FY 2022-23 will include additional $15k re-budgeted from unspent budget in FY 2021-22. PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION:This program will install traffic calming devices as recommended by the Traffic Safety Commission and City Council in compliance with the Traffic Calming Program.Traffic calming devices are used to slow vehicle speeds, discourage bypass vehicle traffic on residential streets, and enhance pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle safety. Traffic calming devices installed in past years have generally been radar speed signs along arterial and collector roadways (e.g. Patterson Boulevard, Taylor Boulevard, Pleasant Hill Road, Gregory Lane, Oak Park Boulevard, and Viking Drive).Other types of traffic calming devices include, but are not limited to: raised intersections, traffic circles, roundabouts, chicanes, concrete bulb-out, traffic diverters, and pavement striping.

IP-1
EXHIBIT D 9.5.e
Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: Exhibit D. CIP Traffic Calming Program (IP-1) (Second Amendment to Design Professional

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23 AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN

AND APPROVING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE

OF POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT

SERVICES JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

SYNOPSIS
The Fire Districts Association of California Employment Benefits Association (FDAC EBA) and Fire Agencies Self Insurance System (FASIS) will consolidate, effective July 1, 2023, to form Fire Risk Management Services (FRMS). FRMS is a multi-line risk pool of eligible fire districts and public agencies that provide emergency services employee benefits coverage and workers’ compensation.

DISCUSSION
Background
The City of Pleasant Hill is a member of the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) known as the Fire Districts Association of California Employment Benefits Authority (FDAC EBA) with the purpose of establishing, operating, managing, and administering health and welfare benefit programs for existing and retired employees, officers, and members of the legislative body of agencies. FDAC EBA is a non-profit public benefit corporation organized to assist and promote the interests of its public agency members.

The City joined the FDAC EBA due to instability and escalating rate increases in the medical benefit market place. The City is now able to provide medical plans to employees that are comprehensive and competitively priced due to the JPA. The medical plans are sponsored by the FDAC EBA JPA and the JPA works in conjunction with Keenan & Associates, an insurance broker, to create comprehensive programs that include medical, dental, vision and life insurance benefits to participating agencies. When the City joined the FDAC EBA it opted to continue providing dental and vision through the Dublin Insure. The dental and vision insurance packages offered by Dublin Insure are less expensive than the FDAC EBA sponsored plans.

The FDAC EBA and FASIS Consolidation Advisory Committee has met regularly over the past twelve months to work toward streamlining the financial and administrative services via a consolidation of the two programs. At the Special Board of Directors Meeting on February 22, 2023,

9.6 Packet Pg. 126
the FASIS and FDAC EBA Boards unanimously approved the FRMS Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (JPA), effective July 1, 2023.

Analysis
The Fire Districts Association of California Employment Benefits Association (FDAC EBA) and Fire Agencies Self Insurance System (FASIS) will consolidate effective July 1, 2023 to form Fire Risk Management Services (FRMS). FRMS is a multi-line risk pool of eligible fire districts and public agencies that provide emergency services employee benefits coverage and worker’s compensation.

The combined leadership determined that a multi-line risk pool would recognize economies of scale, streamline financial and administrative resources, and reduce duplicative programs, thus providing efficient and effective service to an expanded membership. Governed by the Board of Directors, the consolidated pool will expand and enhance member services as a joint body. The consolidation will also provide the most competitive rates available to its members. Members may choose to participate in one or both programs under a single joint powers agreement.

The FDAC EBA joint powers agreement has proven to be a viable and successful alternative to the commercial insurance marketplace for the City. As a member of the FDAC EBA the City receives competitive medical insurance programs. The new agreement requires approval by Council no later than June 20, 2023 and requires a new three-year minimum participation period.

By streamlining and sharing services previously delivered and administered by multiple service providers (program administration, legal counsel, financial and claim auditors, etc.), members of FRMS will recognize a reduction in administrative and overhead costs.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is an anticipated cost savings based on a reduction in administrative and overhead costs.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to sign and execute the amended and restated JPA with Fire Risk Management Services.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
End the City’s participation in the FDAC EBA and direct staff to seek alternative medical coverage for its employees.

9.6 Packet Pg. 127
ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement Prepared by: Ericka R. Mitchell, Human Resources & Risk Manager Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

9.6 Packet Pg. 128

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN AND APPROVING THE AMENDED AND

RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT OF

THE FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Fire Agencies Self Insurance System (FASIS) was formed in 1984 for the purpose of jointly funding losses and providing risk management services to reduce such losses by and among California fire protection and community services districts; and WHEREAS, the FDAC Employment Benefits Authority (FDAC EBA) was formed in 2005 to establish, operate, manage, and administer health and welfare benefit programs for the benefit of the existing and retired officers, employees and members of the legislative body of the California public agencies who are members of FDAC EBA; and WHEREAS, following the exploration and in-depth analysis of a strategic partnership, the Board of Directors of FASIS and FDAC EBA directed the merger of the two programs, effective July 1, 2023, to provide comprehensive and cost-effective coverage programs through a responsive risk pool for fire service agencies; and
WHEREAS, FASIS and FDAC EBA have agreed that FASIS will change its name to Fire Risk Management Services (FRMS) and adopt an amended and restated joint exercise of powers agreement, and that FDAC EBA will assign its rights and liabilities to FRMS and adopt the same agreement as its own; and
WHEREAS, the amended and restated agreement (Exhibit 1) allows FRMS to operate the programs previously operated by both FDAC EBA and FASIS, and admit members that would have been eligible to join either FDAC EBA or FASIS in the past; and WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill is currently a member of FDAC EBA, and the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill finds it in the best interest of the City of Pleasant Hill to continue participating in and obtaining coverage and risk management services from FRMS; and WHEREAS, FRMS requires the City of Pleasant Hill to pass a resolution expressing the desire and commitment of the City of Pleasant Hill to approve the amended and restated joint exercise of powers agreement of FRMS and continue participation in FRMS, which requires a new three-year minimum participation period.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill approves the Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for FRMS, as presented; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to sign the Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement that shall enable the City of Pleasant Hill to continue participating in the joint self-insurance and risk management programs provided by FRMS.

9.6.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

9.6.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 1 AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT

OF FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES
(Formerly Fire Agencies Self Insurance System (FASIS))
This Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement of Fire Risk Management Services (“FRMS”) (“Agreement”), formerly known as the Fire Agencies Self Insurance System (“FASIS”) is made and entered into by and among the public agencies organized and existing under the laws of the State of California who have or may hereafter execute this Joint Powers Agreement (the “Members”) pursuant to the authority conferred by Government Code Section 6500 et seq.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, each of the Members who have executed this Agreement is a “public agency” as that term is defined in Section 6500 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. provides that two or more public agencies may by agreement jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties; and
WHEREAS, California Labor Code Section 3700 (c) authorizes public agencies, including members of a pooling arrangement under a joint powers authority, to fund and self-insure for their Worker’s Compensation claims liability; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 990.4 provides that a local public agency may self-insure, purchase insurance through an authorized carrier, purchase insurance through a surplus lines broker, or any combination of these; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections 989 and 990 authorize a local public agency to self-insure itself and its employees against tort and inverse condemnation liability; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 990.8 provides that two or more local public agencies may, by a joint powers agreement, provide insurance for any purpose by any one or more of the methods specified in Government Code Section 990.4; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 990.6 provides that the cost of such insurance or self-insurance is an authorized and appropriate expenditure of public funds; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections 53200, 53201(a), 53202, 53202.2, 65205, 53205.1, 53205.16, 53206, 53208 and Health and Safety Code Section 13800 et seq. provide that a local public agency may provide for any health and welfare benefits for the benefit of its existing and retired officers, employees, and members of its legislative body, which health and welfare benefits include, but are not limited to medical, hospital surgical, disability, legal expense, dental, vision, life, and income protection insurance or benefits, whether provided on an insurance basis, self-funded basis, or some combination of insurance and self-funding; and

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 2 WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53202 states that in providing such health and welfare benefits, a public agency may approve self-funded plans or may contract with one or more admitted insurers, health service organizations or legal service organizations for such plans of health and welfare benefits as the public agency determines to be in the best interest of the public agency and its existing and retired officers, employees and legislative body; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53205 provides that the legislative body of a public agency may expend public agency funds for the premiums, dues or other charges for health and welfare benefits of its existing and retired officers, employees, and members of its legislative body; and
WHEREAS, each of the Members which are parties to this Agreement desire to join together with other Members in order to collectively establish, operate, manage, administer and fund programs of insurance and/or self-insurance for workers’ compensation benefits, employment benefits, general liability, property damage, and other coverages to be determined; and
WHEREAS, each of the Members which are parties to this Agreement find it to be to its mutual advantage and in the public benefit to utilize any power common to them, and all those powers available to a Joint Powers Authority pursuant to the Joint Powers Act at Government Code Section 6500 et seq. (the “Act”), to fulfill the purposes of this Agreement specified in Section 3 hereof, including establishing pools for self-insured losses and purchasing excess or re-insurance and administrative services in connection with the Joint Protection Programs (the “Coverage Programs”) for the collective benefit of the Members; and WHEREAS, certain Members have previously executed that certain Amended Joint Powers Agreement of FASIS dated October 13, 2005 (the “FASIS JPA”), which agreement such Members desire to amend and restate by this Agreement; and WHEREAS, this Amendment and Restatement is intended to allow members of Fire Districts Association of California Employment Benefits Authority (“FDAC EBA”) to join FRMS and share in consolidated administration and governance of programs by amending and restating its existing Joint Powers Agreement to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the governing body of each Member has determined that it in the best interests of the Member, and in the public interest, to execute this Agreement and participate in FRMS as a Member;
WHEREAS, it is to the mutual advantage of and in the best interest of the parties to this Joint Powers Agreement to continue and expand this Joint Powers Authority for the purposes stated.

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of all of the mutual benefits, covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 3 SECTION 1:

DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall apply to the provisions of this Agreement:

1. “Act” means Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the California Government Code, as amended.

2. “Administrator” shall mean the employee or third-party contractor who is appointed by the Board of Directors to manage the business and affairs of FRMS under the policy direction of the Board of Directors.

3. “Assessment” means an amount additional to a Member’s initial contribution or annual contribution, which the Board of Directors determines, in accordance with this Agreement and/or the Bylaws, that a Member or Former Member owes on account of its participation in a Coverage Program for a given Program year.

4. “Board of Directors” or “Board” shall mean the governing body of FRMS.

5. “Bylaws” means the Bylaws of FRMS adopted by the Board of Directors, as they may be amended from time to time.

6. “Claim” shall mean a demand made by or against a Member or Former Member which is or may be covered by one of the Coverage Programs approved by the Board of Directors.

7. “Contribution” shall mean the amount determined by the Board of Directors to be the appropriate sum of money which a Member must pay at the commencement of or during a Program Year in exchange for the benefits provided by a Coverage Program.

8. “Coverage Program” shall mean the specific type of Joint Protection Program as set forth in the terms, conditions and exclusions of the Coverage Documents for insured or selfinsured losses, and the purchasing of excess or re-insurance and administrative services with respect to such losses. On the effective date, FRMS will operate two (2) Coverage Programs, the Workers’ Compensation Coverage Program for workers’ compensation claims, and the Employment Benefits Coverage Program for claims related to medical, hospital surgical, disability, legal expense, dental, vision, life, and income protection insurance or benefits. FRMS may add additional programs later.

9. “Coverage Documents” shall mean the Declarations, Memorandum of Coverages, Coverage Agreements, Endorsements, Policies of Insurance or any other documents that provide the terms, conditions, limits and exclusions of coverage afforded by a Coverage Program.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 4 10. “District” shall mean a special district and political subdivision of the State of California as defined in Government Code Section 56000 et seq.

11. “Duly Constituted Board Meeting” shall mean any meeting of the Board of Directors noticed and held pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act and at which a quorum is determined to be present at the beginning of said meeting.

12. “Estimated Contribution” shall mean the amount which the Board of Directors estimates will be the appropriate contribution for a Member’s participation in a Coverage Program for a Program Year.

13. “Excess or Re-Insurance” shall mean that insurance that may be purchased on behalf of FRMS and/or the Members to protect the funds of the Members or Former Members against catastrophic losses or an unusual frequency of losses in a particular Coverage Program during a Program Year in excess of any self-insured retention maintained by FRMS for that Coverage Program.

14. “Fiscal Year” shall mean that period of 12 months which is established by the Board of Directors as the fiscal year of FRMS.

15. “Former Member” shall mean a Member which was a signatory to this Agreement (or the prior FASIS Agreement) but which has withdrawn from, or been involuntarily terminated from participation in FMRS.

16. “Joint Protection Program” shall mean a Coverage Program offered by FRMS, separate and distinct from other Coverage Programs, wherein Members shall jointly pool their losses and claims, jointly purchase excess or re-insurance and administrative and other services including claims adjusting, data processing, risk management consulting and brokerage, loss prevention, legal, accounting and auditing and related services.

17. “Member” shall mean a public agency which has signed this Agreement, which qualifies as a Member under the provisions of this Agreement and the Bylaws, and which has been approved for membership by the Board of Directors.

18. “Memorandum of Coverage” shall mean a document issued by FRMS for each Coverage Program specifying the coverages and limits provided to the Members participating in that Coverage Program.

19. “Pooling” shall mean group self-insurance as permitted by Government Code Section 990.8, Labor Code Section 3700 and Government Code Section 53202.

20. “Program Year” shall mean a 12-month period of time determined by the Board of Directors, during which a particular Coverage Program is in effect.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 5 21. “Retained Earnings” shall mean an account reflecting the accumulated earnings of a Coverage Program after payment of all losses, expenses and obligations of that Coverage Program.

22. “Risk Management” shall mean the process of identifying, evaluating, reducing, transferring and eliminating risks. Risk Management includes, but is not limited to, various methods of funding claims payments, purchasing insurance, legal defense of claims, controlling losses, and determining self-insurance retention levels and the amount of reserves for potential claims.

SECTION 2:

FRMS AS SUCCESSOR TO AND EXPANSION OF FASIS
FASIS was originally formed on July 1, 1984, pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 6500 et seq. as a joint powers authority to provide a program of pooling of self-insured workers’ compensation losses of its members, which members were defined as California fire protection districts formed and operating under the provisions of California Health and Safety Code Section 13800 et seq. and California community services districts providing fire suppression and emergency services formed and operating under the provisions of California Government Code Section 61000, et seq. FASIS has continued to provide this self-insurance program up to the effective date of this Agreement.

As of the effective date of this Agreement, the Fire Agencies Self Insurance System shall be known as Fire Risk Management Services, referred to herein as FRMS. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6506 and 6507, from its inception, FRMS has, is, and shall be a public entity separate and independent from the Members which is governed exclusively by its Board of Directors (“Board”).

FDAC EBA was originally formed on July 1, 2005, pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 6500 et seq. as a joint powers authority to provide employment benefits programs including medical, hospital surgical, disability, legal expense, dental, vision, life, and income protection insurance or benefits, whether provided on an insurance basis, self-funded basis, or some combination of insurance and self-funding, to any California public agency including special districts, cities, and joint powers authorities which were formed with the power to provide fire suppression and emergency services. FDAC EBA has continued to provide this employment benefits program up to the effective date of this Agreement.

This Agreement is being amended and restated in part to allow members of Fire Districts Association of California Employment Benefits Authority (“FDAC EBA”) to join FRMS and share in consolidated administration and governance of programs. Accordingly, as of the effective date of this Agreement, the membership of FRMS shall consist of the members of FASIS, as well as the members of FDAC EBA that have approved this Agreement. Future membership in FRMS is open to public agencies throughout California that meet the membership requirements specified herein and in the Bylaws and are approved for membership by the Board of Directors.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 6 SECTION 3:

PURPOSE
This Agreement is entered into by the Members pursuant to Government Code Sections 989, 990, 990.4, 990.6, 990.8, 52200 et seq., 6500 et seq. and Labor Code Section 3700, et seq., in order to provide, subject to the Coverage Documents, workers’ compensation and employment benefits coverages, and/or coverages for other risks which the Board of Directors may determine.

Additional purposes of this Agreement are: (1) to reduce the amount and frequency of losses, and to decrease the costs incurred by Members in the handling and litigation of claims; (2) to expand the breadth and reduce the costs of health and welfare benefits including, but are not limited to medical, hospital, surgical, disability, legal expense, dental, vision, life, and income protection insurance or benefits, whether provided on an insurance basis, self-funded basis, or some combination of insurance and self-funding. These purposes shall be accomplished through the exercise of the powers of the Members jointly in the creation of a separate public entity, Fire Risk Management Services (“FMRS”) to establish and administer Coverage Programs as set forth herein and in the Bylaws.

It is also the purpose of this Agreement to provide for the inclusion at subsequent dates of such additional Members organized and existing as California public agencies as may desire to become parties to this Agreement and Members of FRMS, subject to approval by the Board of Directors.

SECTION 4:

MEMBERSHIP
Each Member which is a party to this Agreement must be a public agency which is duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to provide at least one of the following services: (1) fire suppression services, (2) emergency medical services, including emergency disease response, prevention and control services; (3) hazardous material response services (4) medical transport and/or ambulance services, including emergency transportation services (5) rescue services; (6) any other emergency response services provided pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Government Code Section 8550 et seq.). “Emergency” is defined as any condition of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and/or property caused by such conditions as air pollution, fire, flood, hazardous material incident, storm, epidemic, riot, drought, plant or animal infestations or disease, earthquake, terrorism, or sudden and severe energy shortage. Each Member must be approved for participation in the Authority in the manner provided in the Bylaws of the Authority.

There shall be two (2) classes of Membership: (1) Voting Members; and (2) Non-voting Members.

Voting Members shall be public agencies organized as a fire protection district formed and operating pursuant to the terms of California Health and Safety Code Section 13800 et seq. All other Members shall be Non-voting Members.

The rights and obligations of Voting Members shall be as described in the Bylaws.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 7 SECTION 5:

PARTIES TO AGREEMENT
Each Member which has signed this Agreement certifies that it intends to and does contract with FRMS, and with all other parties who have signed this Agreement, and, in addition, with such other parties which may later be added as a party to and may sign this Agreement. Each party to this Agreement, which has or may hereafter sign this Agreement, also certifies that the withdrawal of any party from this Agreement by voluntary withdrawal, involuntary termination, or otherwise, shall not affect this Agreement nor such party’s intent to contract with the other remaining parties to this Agreement.

SECTION 6:

TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall become effective as to existing Members of FASIS on the later of July 1, 2023, or the date on which the last of two-thirds of such Members have executed this Agreement (“effective date”). This Agreement shall become effective as to existing Members of FDAC EBA on the later of July1, 2023 or the date on which two-thirds of its members have executed this Agreement.

This Agreement shall become effective as to each new Member upon: (1) approval of its membership by the Board of Directors of the FRMS; (2) execution of this Agreement by the new Member and by FRMS; and (3) by payment by the new Member of its initial contribution for participation in one of the Coverage Programs offered by the FRMS.

SECTION 7:

POWERS OF FRMS
FRMS shall have all the powers common to its Members and all additional powers set forth in the Joint Powers Authority Act, and is hereby authorized to do all acts necessary for the exercise of said common powers, including, but not limited to, any or all of the following:
(1) to make and enter into contracts, including the power to accept the assignment of contracts or other obligations which relate to the purposes of FRMS, or which were entered into by a Member or Former Member prior to joining FRMS, and to acquire assets, incur liabilities, and resolve and make claims; (2) to accept an assignment from the FDAC EBA of all its assets, obligations and liabilities (including claims and contracts in existence at the time of consolidation) in order to benefit the Members and Former Members participating in the FDAC EBA employment benefits coverage program; provided, that except for the fair and equitable allocation of administrative and overhead expenses, funds from such assignment shall not be commingled and shall be separately accounted for as provided in this Agreement and the Bylaws;

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 8 (3) to incur debts, liabilities or other obligations; including those which are not debts, liabilities or other obligations of the Members or Former Members, or any of them; (4) to charge and collect Contributions and Assessments from Members or Former Members for participation in a Coverage Program;
(5) to employ agents and employees and/or to contract for services from third-party consultants;
(6) to receive grants and donations of property, funds, services, and other forms of assistance from persons, firms, corporations and government entities; (7) to acquire, hold, lease or dispose of property, funds, contributions, donations, and any other forms of assistance from persons, firms, corporations and government entities; (8) to acquire property by gift, grant, exchange, devise, or purchase; (9) to hold, lease, convey, sell, encumber, or dispose of property; (10) to sue and to be sued in its own name;
(11) to issue or caused to be issue bonded and other indebtedness, and pledge any property or revenues as security to the extent permitted by law by Articles 2 and 4 of the Act or otherwise, including, but not limited to, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness issued on behalf of FRMS or its Members;
(12) to obtain in its own name all necessary permits, licenses, opinions and rulings; (13) whenever necessary to facilitate the exercise of its powers, to form and administer nonprofit corporations to perform one or more of the functions which FRMS is empowered to perform, or to perform any other proper corporate function, and to enter into agreements with such nonprofit corporations;
(14) to exercise all powers necessary and proper to carry out the terms and provisions of this Agreement (including the provision of all other appropriate ancillary coverages for the benefit of Members or Former Members, or otherwise authorized by law or the Act; and (15) to exercise all powers and perform all acts as otherwise provided in the Bylaws.

Said powers shall be exercised pursuant to the terms hereof, and in the manner provided by law and in accordance with Section 6509 of the Act. The foregoing powers shall be subject to the restrictions upon the manner of exercising such powers pertaining to the Member or Former Member designated in the Bylaws.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 9 SECTION 8:

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
All powers of FRMS shall be exercised by, and its property controlled and its affairs conducted by and through its Board of Directors. Said Board of Directors is hereby designated as the agency to administer and execute this Agreement pursuant to Government Code Section 6506.

The Board of Directors shall be composed of no more than fifteen (15) and no less than eleven (11) individuals, each of whom is elected by a majority vote of Voting Members participating in a Coverage Program, as specified in the Bylaws. Each member of the Board of Directors shall have one vote. The terms for Directors, procedures for electing Directors, and the composition of the Board of Directors shall be as set forth in the Bylaws. The Board of Directors shall have the authority to conduct all business and govern all affairs of this Joint Powers Authority under the provisions hereof and pursuant to law and shall have such powers and functions as are provided for herein, in the Bylaws, or by law.

SECTION 9:

POWERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors shall have such powers as provided in this Agreement and the Bylaws and such additional powers as necessary or appropriate to fulfill the purposes of this Agreement and the Bylaws, including, but not limited to the following:
(a) Exercise all powers and conduct all business of this Joint Powers Authority. (b) Determine the details of and select the Coverage Programs to be offered by FRMS; (c) Provide for and develop various services including, but not limited to, financial administration, insurance consulting and brokerage services; claims adjustment services, loss control and risk management services; accountancy, auditing and actuarial services; and legal and legislative advocacy services, either through its own employees or contracts with third parties.
(d) Appoint and provide policy direction to the Administrator, appoint committees, appoint staff, and employ such persons as the Board of Directors deems necessary for the administration of this Joint Powers Authority.
(e) Determine and purchase all necessary insurance coverage, including Excess insurance, Re-insurance, liability insurance, director’s and officer’s liability insurance, and such other insurance as FRMS may deem necessary or proper to carry out the Coverage Programs offered by the Authority, and to protect the employees of FRMS and the employees of the Members.
(f) Fix and collect Contributions and Assessments from participating Members in consideration for participation in the Coverage Programs offered by FRMS.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 10 (g) Deposit all funds received in appropriate separate bank accounts in the name of Fire Risk Management Services.
(h) Invest funds on hand in any manner authorized by law for the investment of funds of a public agency.
(i) Direct the payment, adjustment, compromise, settlement and defense of all claims as provided for in the Coverage Documents involving a Member during their period of membership in and participation in a Coverage Program.
(j) Expend funds of FRMS only for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the Agreement and the Bylaws as they now exist or may hereafter be amended. (k) Obtain a fidelity bond in such amount as the Board of Directors may determine for any person or persons who have charge of or the authority to expend funds of the FRMS. (l) Acquire property by gift, grant, exchange, devise, or purchase; or hold, lease, convey, sell, encumber, or dispose of all property necessary or appropriate to carry out the powers and operations of FRMS.
(m) Establish policies and procedures for the operation of FRMS. (n) Enter into any and all contracts or agreements necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes and functions of FRMS.
(o) To prepare the annual operating budget of FRMS for each fiscal year. (p) To engage, retain and discharge agents, representatives, firms or other organizations as the Board of Directors deems necessary for the administration of FRMS. (q) To exercise general supervisory power and policy control over the Executive Director. (r) To transact any other business which is within the powers of the Board of Directors. (s) Elect officers of FRMS.

SECTION 10:

OFFICERS
The officers of FRMS shall consist of the President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, Assistant Treasurer, and Administrator. The position of Treasurer shall be filled by a person who either is the treasurer of a Member, a certified public accountant, or one of the officers, employees, or contracted consultants of FRMS. The Treasurer shall have no vote unless the Treasurer is also a Director.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 11 The Treasurer shall serve at the discretion of the President. The Treasurer shall be the depository of and have custody of all the funds of FRMS, from whatever source. The Treasurer shall comply with the duties and responsibilities of the office as set forth in subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, of Section 6505.5 of the Government Code. The Board shall require the Treasurer to file with FRMS an official bond in the amount to be fixed by the Board. FRMS shall pay the cost of bond premiums required by this section.

In lieu of the designation of a treasurer and auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 6505.5, FRMS elects to appoint the Treasurer of FRMS to said positions under the provision of Government Code Section 6505.6. FRMS further elects to be governed by and incorporates herein all other provisions contained within Government Code Section 6505.6, including but not limited to the requirement that the Treasurer shall cause an independent audit to be made by a certified public accountant, or public accountant, in compliance with Section 6505. The treasurer, or the treasurer’s designee, shall maintain or cause to be maintained all accounting or other financial records FRMS and shall file all financial reports required of FRMS and shall perform such other duties as the Board may specify.

All offices shall be filled and have the powers and responsibilities as prescribed in the Bylaws.

SECTION 11:

RESTRICTIONS ON POWER
Such powers enumerated in Section 8 hereof are subject to the restrictions upon the manner of exercising power by the California public agency which is a Member and which is named in the Bylaws, pursuant to California Government Code Section 6509.

SECTION 12:

COMPLIANCE WITH THE BROWN ACT
All meetings of the Board, including regular, adjourned regular and special meetings shall be called, noticed, held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code section 54950 et seq.

SECTION 13:

BYLAWS
The Board shall promulgate Bylaws to govern day-to-day operations of FRMS. The Board may amend the Bylaws from time to time as provided for in the Bylaws. The initial Bylaws of FRMS, a copy of which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit A, are hereby adopted as the initial Bylaws of FRMS. Each party to this Agreement by the execution hereof agrees to be bound by and to comply with all the terms and conditions of this Agreement and of said Bylaws as they now exist or may hereafter be amended, and agrees that any violation of the Bylaws shall be a violation of this Agreement. FRMS shall operate and conduct its business and affairs pursuant to the terms of

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 12 this Agreement and said Bylaws. In the event any provisions of the Bylaws conflict with a provision of this Agreement, the provision contained in this Agreement shall control.

SECTION 14:

COVERAGE PROGRAMS
FRMS shall maintain such types and levels of coverage for Coverage Programs as determined by the Board of Directors. The coverage afforded under one or more Coverage Programs may include protection for workers’ compensation liability, employment health and welfare benefits, and any other risks which the Board of Directors may determine to be advisable. More than one type of coverage may be afforded under a single Coverage Program. FRMS shall describe the coverage and operation of each Coverage Program in writing utilizing documents such as Memorandums of Coverage, Master Program Documents, or other written policies and procedures.

The Board of Directors may arrange for purchase of Excess or Re-insurance. FRMS shall not be liable to any Member or to any other person or organization if such excess or re-insurance policies are terminated, cancelled or non-renewed without prior notice to one or more Members, or if there is a reduction in the type or amounts of coverage afforded under a Coverage Program by reason of any change in coverage in a succeeding excess or re-insurance policy, even if such reduction occur without prior notice to one or more Members.

SECTION 15:

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COVERAGE PROGRAMS
The Board of Directors shall establish the coverage afforded by each Coverage Program, the amount of Contributions and Assessments, the precise cost allocation plans and formulas, provide for the handling of Claims, and specify the amounts and types of Excess or Re-insurance to be obtained. The Contributions and Assessments for each Coverage Program shall be determined by the Board of Directors as set forth herein, in the Bylaws, or in the controlling documents for each Coverage Program.

SECTION 16:

ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS
(a) Annual Budget. FRMS shall, pursuant to the Bylaws, annually adopt an operating budget, including budgets for each Coverage Program.
(b) Funds and Accounts. FRMS shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as required by the Board of Directors and as required by generally accepted accounting principles, including separate funds and accounts for each Coverage Program. Books and records of FRMS shall be open to any inspection at all reasonable times by authorized representatives of Members, or as otherwise required by law. (c) Investments. Subject to the applicable provisions of any indenture or resolution providing for the investment of moneys held thereunder, FRMS shall have the power to

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 13 invest any money in the treasury that is not required for the immediate necessities of FRMS, as the Board determines advisable, in the same manner as local agencies pursuant to Government Code Section 53601 et seq. as such provisions may be amended or supplemented.
(d) No Commingling. The funds, reserves, and accounts of each Coverage Program shall not be commingled and shall be accounted for separately; provided, however, that administration and overhead expenses of FRMS not related to a specific Coverage Program may be fairly and equitably allocated among Coverage Programs as determined by the Board of Directors. Investments and cash accounts may be combined for administrative convenience, but separate accounting shall be made for balances of individual funds and Coverage Program revenues and expenses. (e) Annual Audit. The Board shall provide for a certified, annual audit of the accounts and records of FRMS, in the manner prescribed in the Bylaws.

SECTION 17:

SERVICES PROVIDED BY FRMS
FRMS may provide, in the discretion of the Board of Directors, the following services in connection with this Agreement:
(a) To provide or procure coverage, including but not limited to self-insurance funds and commercial insurance, as well as Excess or Re-insurance and umbrella insurance, by negotiation, bid or purchase;
(b) To assist Members in obtaining insurance coverage for risks not included within the coverages of FRMS;
(c) To assist risk managers with the implementation of risk management functions as they relate to risks covered by the Coverage Programs offered by FRMS; (d) To provide loss control and safety consulting services to Members; (e) To provide claims adjusting and subrogation services for Claims covered by the Coverage Programs;
(f) To provide loss analysis and control through the use of statistical analysis, data processing, and record and file retention services, in order to identify high exposure operations and to evaluate proper levels of self-insured retention and deductibles; (g) To conduct risk management and claims audits relating to the participation of Members in the Coverage Programs;
(h) To provide such other services as deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 14 SECTION 18:

RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEMBERS
Members or Former Members shall have the following responsibilities, which shall survive the withdrawal from, or involuntary termination of participation in a Coverage Program, or membership in FRMS:
(a) Each Member shall designate an individual to be responsible for the risk management functions within that Member and to serve as a liaison between the Member and FRMS as to risk management.
(b) Each Member shall consider all recommendations of FRMS concerning unsafe practices and/or hazard mitigation, and each Member participating in the Workers’ Compensation Coverage Program shall implement and maintain an injury and illness prevention program as required by the California Labor Code within ninety (90) days of inception into program.
(c) Each benefits program Member shall maintain its own set of records, including a loss log, in all categories of risk covered by each Coverage Program in which it participates to assure accuracy of FRMS’ loss reporting system, unless it is deemed no longer necessary by the Board of Directors;
(d) Each Member participating in the Workers’ Compensation Program shall report jobrelated accidents or illnesses to the appropriate claims administrator as soon as practicable after notification of the accident or illness, and no later than 48 hours after notification, shall use the format specified by the claims administrator when making jobrelated accident reports, and make any other required notifications to government agencies, including Cal-OSHA, when required;
(e) Each Member shall pay its Contribution, and any adjustments thereto, and any Assessments within the specified time period set forth in the invoice, or as otherwise set forth in the Bylaws. After withdrawal or termination, each Former Member or its successor shall promptly pay to FRMS its share of any additional Contributions, adjustments or Assessments, if any, as required of it by the Board of Directors; (f) Each Member or Former Member shall provide FRMS with such other information or assistance as may be necessary for FRMS to carry out the Coverage Programs in which the Member or Former Member participates or has participated; (g) Each Member or Former Member shall in any and all ways cooperate with and assist FRMS and any insurer of FRMS, in all matters relating to this Agreement and covered Claims;
(h) Each Member or Former Member shall comply with all Bylaws, rules, regulations and operating policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Directors.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 15 SECTION 19:

NEW MEMBERS
FRMS shall allow entry into its Coverage Programs of new Members, only upon approval of the Board of Directors, with any conditions or limitations that the Board deems appropriate. In order to become a Member and remain a Member, any public agency must participate in at least one Coverage Program, pay the Contributions required for such participation, and shall be authorized to exercise the common powers set forth in this Agreement.

SECTION 20:

WITHDRAWAL
Any Member may voluntarily withdraw from this Agreement only at the end of any applicable Program Year and only if:
(a) The Member has been a party to this Amended and Restated Agreement for not less than three (3) full Program Years as of the date of the proposed withdrawal; (b) The Member submits at least 90 (ninety) days signed written withdrawal notification in accordance with the Bylaws;
(c) In order to withdraw from the Agreement, the Member must have completed the three (3) full Program Year participation requirement for each Coverage Program in which the Member participated at the time of withdrawal.

Any Member may voluntarily withdraw from any particular Coverage Program only at the end of any applicable Program Year and only if:
(a) The Member has participated in a Coverage Program for at least three (3) full Program Years;
(b) The Member is a participant in another Coverage Program; and (c) The Member submits at least ninety (90) days signed written withdrawal notification in accordance with the Bylaws.

In the event that the three (3) year participation requirement for any Coverage Program has not been met, for each Coverage Program the withdrawing Member participated in at the time of withdrawal for less than three (3) years, such withdrawing Member shall be obligated to pay all Contributions and Assessments as if that Member had remained in such Coverage Program for the required three (3) full years.

In the event the notice of withdrawal is not provided as required above, any such withdrawing Member shall, with respect to each Coverage Program the Member participated in, be obligated to pay any and all Contributions and Assessments for the next full Program Year.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 16 A Member may not withdraw as a party to this Agreement until it has withdrawn from all of the Coverage Programs of FRMS as provided herein and in the Bylaws.

SECTION 21:

EXPULSION
FRMS shall have the right to expel any Member’s participation in a Coverage Program, or expel a Member from FRMS, for violation of the terms of this Agreement, the Bylaws, or any other rule, regulation or operational policy adopted by the Board of Directors of FRMS, in the manner provided for in the Bylaws.

The participation of any Member of FRMS, including participation in any of FRMS’ Coverage Programs, may be expelled in the discretion of the Board of Directors whenever such Member is dissolved, consolidated, merged or annexed. Any such expulsion shall not relieve the Member or Former Member of its membership responsibilities specified in this Agreement.

SECTION 22:

EFFECT OF WITHDRAWAL OR EXPULSION
The withdrawal from or expulsion of any Member from this Agreement shall not be construed as a completion of the purpose of the Agreement, nor shall it terminate this Agreement. Any Member that withdraws or is expelled after the effective date of this Amended and Restated Agreement shall not be entitled to payment, return or refund of any Contribution, Assessment, consideration, or other property paid or donated by the Member to FRMS, or to any return of any loss reserve contribution, or to any distribution of assets.

The withdrawal from or expulsion of any Member from any Coverage Program shall not terminate its responsibilities to pay its unpaid Contributions, adjustments, or Assessments to such Coverage Program. The Board of Directors shall determine the final amount due from the Member or Former Member by way of Contributions or Assessments, if any, or any credit due on account thereof, to the Member or Former Member for the period of its participation. Such determination shall not be made until all Claims or other unpaid liabilities of that Coverage Program have been finally resolved.

SECTION 23:

TERMINATION OF FRMS AND DISTRIBUTION
This Agreement may be terminated at any time with the written consent of two-thirds of the then participating Members; provided, however, that FRMS and this Agreement shall continue to exist for the purpose of disposing of all claims, distribution of all assets, and all other functions necessary to wind up the affairs of the Authority.

The Board of Directors is vested with all powers of FRMS for the purposes of winding up and dissolving the business affairs of FRMS. These powers include the power to require Members or Former Members who were signatories to this Agreement at the time the subject Claims were

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 17 incurred, to pay any Assessments in accordance with loss allocation formulas for final disposition of all Claims and losses covered by this Agreement or the Bylaws.

Upon termination of a Coverage Program, all net assets of such Coverage Program other shall be distributed only among Members that are participating in such Coverage Program at the time of termination, in accordance with and proportionate to their Contributions, adjustments, and Assessments paid less claims or losses paid during the period of that Member’s participation in the Coverage Program. The Board of Directors shall determine the distribution in the manner specified in the Bylaws.

Upon termination of this Agreement, all net assets of FRMS, other than the net assets of any Coverage Program distributed as provided above, shall be distributed only among Members in good standing at the time of such termination in accordance with and proportionate to each such Member’s contributions made and claims or losses paid, as permitted by Government Code Section 6512.2. The Board of Directors shall determine such distribution in the manner specified in the Bylaws.

In lieu of terminating this Agreement, the Board may, with the written consent of two-thirds of the Voting Members, elect to assign and transfer all rights, assets, liabilities and obligations of FRMS to a successor joint powers authority created under the Act.

SECTION 24:

AMENDMENTS
This Joint Powers Agreement may be amended by an amendment in writing signed by two-thirds of the Members then parties to this Agreement. Upon signature of any amendment by two-thirds of the then participating Members, any Member failing or refusing to sign such amendment may be involuntarily terminated as a party to this Agreement as provided in the Bylaws.

SECTION 25:

ENFORCEMENT
FRMS is hereby granted authority to enforce this Agreement. In the event action is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement or any term of the Bylaws against any Member which has signed this Agreement, the Member agrees to pay such sums as the court may fix as attorney fees and costs in said action.

SECTION 26:

NON-LIABILITY OF MEMBER AGENCIES
Pursuant to Government Code Section 6508.1, the debts, liabilities and obligations of the FRMS shall not be the debts, liabilities or obligations of the Members which are parties to the Agreement.

Nothing in the Joint Powers Agreement or in the Bylaws adopted pursuant thereto shall be construed as imposing liability upon any Member, or any officer, employee or member of the legislative body thereof, for the payment of any Claims incurred in any of the Coverage Programs

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 18 offered by FRMS to its Members, the sole recourse of claimants being against funds of those insurance programs and/or self-funded programs administered by the FRMS for the payment of such benefits.

SECTION 27:

NON-LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, ADMINISTRATOR,

AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES
The Board of Directors, officers, Administrator, agents, and employees of FRMS shall not be liable to FRMS, to any Member or Former Member, or to any other person for any actual or alleged breach of duty, mistake of judgment, neglect, error, misstatement, misleading statement, or any other act or omission in the performance of their duties hereunder; for any action taken or omitted by any director, officer, administrator, agent, or employee, or independent contractor; for loss incurred through the investment or failure to invest funds; or loss attributable to any failure or omission to procure or maintain insurance; except in the event of fraud, gross negligence, or intentional misconduct of such director, officer, administrator, agent, or employee. No director, officer, administrator, agent, or employee, including former directors, officers, administrators, agents or employees, shall be liable for any action taken or omitted by any other director, officer, administrator, agent, or employee.

SECTION 28:

INDEMNIFICATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND EMPLOYEES As a public entity, FRMS shall defend and shall indemnify and hold harmless its directors, officers, and employees, including former directors, officers and employees, from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, losses and damages arising out of the performance of their duties as such directors, officers and employees of FRMS, except in the event of fraud, gross negligence, corruption, malice or intentional misconduct, and the funds of FRMS shall be used for such purposes. FRMS may purchase conventional insurance to protect FRMS, and its Members and Former Members, against any such acts or omissions by its directors, officers and employees, including former directors, officers and employees.

SECTION 29:

ADMINISTRATION OF PREEXISTING OBLIGATIONS
(a) All liabilities and obligations of FASIS existing prior to the effective date of this Amended and Restated Agreement will be administered under the terms and conditions of the FASIS Agreement as it existed prior to the effective date. (b) All assets of FRMS existing prior to the effective date shall be reserved by FRMS for the sole purpose of administering the preexisting obligations under the FASIS Agreement. (c) The Board shall appoint a committee made up of representatives of Members that were Members of FASIS prior to the effective date to make recommendations to the Board regarding the administration of the preexisting obligations under the FASIS Agreement.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 19 As to specific agenda items relating to such matters, only Directors representing Members who were members of FASIS prior to the effective date may vote, and as to such items, a quorum shall be determined solely by reference to the number of Directors that represent members of FASIS prior to the effective date. (d) In the event that FDAC EBA assigns its rights, assets, liabilities and obligations to FRMS, any assets of FDAC EBA that are assigned to FRMS shall be used exclusively for the purpose of administrating the obligations of FDAC EBA. In the event of such assignment, the Board shall appoint a committee made up of representatives of Members that were Members of FDAC EBA prior to the effective date to make recommendations to the Board regarding the administration of FDAC EBA’s obligations. As to specific agenda items relating to such matters, only Directors representing Members who were members of FDAC EBA prior to the effective date may vote, and as to such items, a quorum shall be determined solely by reference to the number of Directors that represent members of FDAC EBA prior to the effective date.

SECTION 30:

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
(a) This Agreement shall bind and inure to the heirs, devisees, assignees and successors in interest of the Authority and to the successors in interest of each Member in the same manner as if such parties had been expressly named herein. (b) This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the state of California. This Agreement together with the documents incorporated into the Agreement by reference constitute the entire Agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter. There are no oral understandings or agreements not set forth in writing herein. (c) If any provisions in this Agreement are held by any court to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect.
(d) No person or organization or entity shall be entitled to assert the rights of any Member or Former Member under any Coverage Document or Coverage Program. No Member or Former Member may assign any right, claim or interest it may have under this Agreement, and no creditor, assignee or third-party beneficiary of any Member or Former Member shall have any right, claim or title to any part, share, interest, fund, contribution or asset of FRMS.

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA) 20 SECTION 31:

EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and shall be as fully effective as though executed in one document.
_____________________________
(Agency Name)
Date: _________________________ By: ______________________________ Name/Title

9.6.b
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement (Resolution Authorizing Participation in FRMS JPA)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23

APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM

AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20

SYNOPSIS
An Assessment District is a financial mechanism that allows for the levy of an assessment on a specific geographic area or parcels of real estate, which have been identified as receiving a direct special “benefit” from a public service or improvement. Assessment District No. 20 (“AD 20”), Commercial Landscaping and Lighting District, enables the City to provide landscape maintenance and street lighting at an enhanced level along commercial streets. The properties within the AD 20 boundaries directly benefit from these landscape and lighting improvements. The annual assessments paid by property owners within AD 20 and contributions by the City fund the maintenance and services provided.

In order for the City to continue to levy and collect assessments within AD 20 for the 2023/2024 fiscal year, an annual report must be prepared and the City must hold a public hearing. Staff requests that the City Council hold the Public Hearing and adopt the Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report, confirming the diagram and assessment, and ordering the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 for AD 20.

DISCUSSION
Background
AD 20 was formed in 1988 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and the California Streets and Highways Code. AD 20 was amended in 1999 by creating a new zone (Zone 6) that includes the Downtown area.

In order for the City to continue to levy and collect assessments within AD20 for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 (“FY 23/24”), a report on the proposed maintenance program must be prepared and a public hearing conducted on the budget and proposed assessments. The Engineer of Work, Harris & Associates, has completed and filed the FY 23/24 Annual Report (“Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk. The Engineer’s Report (Exhibit 1 to the Resolution) includes descriptions of the

10.1 Packet Pg. 151
improvements to be maintained during the fiscal year, an estimate of costs, a map of the District and Zone boundaries, and the levy of assessments upon the benefiting properties.

Substantial changes in improvements that will begin in FY 23/24 in Zone 1 (paid from nonAssessment District funds) include: installing landscaping; shifting landscape water from domestic to recycled; replacing existing cobra-head lights with new, ornamental median and pedestrian lights; and adding a traffic signal at Contra Costa Boulevard and Alan Drive.

Maintenance costs for Zone 1 are estimated to remain the same in FY 23/24; and Substantial changes in improvements that will begin in FY 22/23 in Zone 6 (paid from nonAssessment District funds) include: replacing existing pear trees with Chinese pistachio trees; widening existing treewells; replacing the existing irrigation system with a new, updated irrigation system; installation of new brick pavers and sidewalk. Maintenance costs for Zone 6 are estimated to remain the same in FY 23/24.

There are no new or substantial changes in improvements proposed to be made in FY 23/24 in Zones 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Analysis
On February 6, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5-23, a Resolution directing the preparation and filing of the 2023/2024 Engineer’s Report for maintenance of AD 20.

On May 15, 2023, the City Council preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report for AD 20 and adopted a Resolution of Intention (“ROI”) to levy and collect assessments. In addition, the ROI provided notice of the date, time, and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the assessments within AD 22.

The collection of assessments from properties within the boundaries of AD 20, together with the funds provided by the City, will ensure continued maintenance of the lighting and landscaping improvements within the boundaries of AD 20. Maintenance staff provides for the maintenance of improvements, including weekly mowing and edging of turf; maintaining and repairing irrigation systems; pruning; removing debris and graffiti; repairing street lights; and weeding, as well as, paying for utility charges for water and electricity.

If AD 20 assessments are confirmed for FY 23/24, staff will continue to provide maintenance services for the District. The AD revenues include $431,901 in assessments collected from property owners within AD 20, $97,946 contribution from the General Fund, and estimated interest of $15,117 for a total of $544,964 in projected revenue.

Assessments are made upon the various properties within AD20 in proportion to the estimated special benefits received. As part of establishing special benefit, properties within the District are divided into six zones of improvement with different assessments based on the amount of special benefit conferred. The City tracks the cost of maintaining the improvements, including incidental expenses, within each zone. Contributions from the City’s General Fund are made by the City in Zones 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 to offset benefits shared with the general public. In Zone 4, in

10.1 Packet Pg. 152
lieu of a contribution, the City pays for the cost to maintain a portion of the Canal Trail median at Gregory Lane. Assessment rates have been established in each zone based upon acreage, street frontage and benefit received. These rates are listed in the attached Engineer’s Report.

The reserve fund for Zone 1 was depleted at the end of FY22/23. Staff recommends conducting a property owner assessment ballot process within Zone 1 so that assessment rates can be increased above the current allowable maximum.

The reserve fund for Zone 6 will be depleted at the end of FY23/24. Staff recommends conducting a property owner assessment ballot process within Zone 6 so that assessment rates can be increased above the current allowable maximum.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Pleasant Hill will contribute approximately $97,946 from the General Fund toward the landscape and lighting costs. This contribution is intended to offset the portion of the landscape and lighting improvements that provide shared benefit to both the general public, and in particular, those properties that are not in the District and are in front of or lie adjacent to District improvements, within the City’s right of way. Should AD 20 not be renewed for FY 23/24, there would be a loss of $431,901 in assessment revenues to fund maintenance activities within AD 20.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Open, conduct, and close the Public Hearing and adopt the Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Report, confirming the diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment for FY 23/24.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Should the Assessment District not be renewed for FY 23/24, there would be a loss of $431,901 in assessment revenues to fund maintenance activities within AD20. The City would need to fund these maintenance activities or services would need to be suspended or substantially reduced

10.1 Packet Pg. 153
ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Engineer’s Report
Prepared by: Ann James, Public Works Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

10.1 Packet Pg. 154
RESOLUTION NO. -23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20 (COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING)
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5-23 directing the preparation and filing of the fiscal year (FY) 2023-24 Annual Report for Assessment District No. 20 (Commercial Landscape and Lighting) (AD 20); and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 31-23 entitled, “A Resolution of Intention of the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill to Order Improvements, Levy Assessments and Provide for Public Hearing and Notice in Assessment District No. 20 for Fiscal Year 2023-24” (the Resolution of Intention); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, the Engineer’s Report on the Levy and Collection of Assessments for FY 2023-24 for AD 20 (the Engineer’s Report) prepared by Harris & Associates was filed with the City Clerk and preliminarily approved subject to certain conditions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Report contains the proposed amounts of the assessments to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of land in all areas of AD 20 for FY 2023-24; the plans and specifications for the improvements; an estimate of the costs of the improvements; a diagram for the assessment district; and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements; a description of any substantial changes in the improvements; and the other matters required by Sections 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, the individual assessments for FY 2023-24 are not proposed to be increased beyond the maximum assessment range established in the Engineer’s Report; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention directed that June 5, 2023, at 7:00 p.m. at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill or via teleconference as noted on the posted agenda (available on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Police Department, and on the City’s web page a minimum of 72 hours before the meeting) be the time and place for the City Council to hold a public hearing on the proposed improvements and the proposed assessments for FY 2023-24; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the proposed improvements and the proposed assessments for FY 2023-24 on June 5, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered all oral and written protests at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council may proceed, pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and Highways Code, to adopt a resolution confirming the levy of the assessments on the assessable parcels of property in the Assessment District, and the adoption of such a resolution shall constitute the levy of assessments on all assessable lots and parcels of property within such zones for FY 2023-24; and

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: AD 20 Proposed Resolution (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) WHEREAS, the assessments for FY 2023-24 which will be levied on the assessable lots and parcels of land in AD 20 will not exceed the previously authorized rates and amounts set forth in the Engineer’s Report;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that:

1. The public interest, convenience and necessity require that the levy be made.

2. The assessable lots and parcels of land benefited by the improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are shown by the Boundary Map and Assessment Diagram of Assessment District No. 20 (Commercial Landscaping and Lighting) (FY 2023-24) filed in the office of the City Clerk, which is made a part hereof by this reference.

3. Any protests to the proposed improvements and the estimated costs and assessments have been received, noted and are overruled.

4. The Engineer’s Report is approved and confirmed, including:
(a) a description of the plans and specifications of the improvements, any substantial changes to the improvements, the Engineer’s estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining the improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith; and
(b) the diagram showing Assessment District No. 20, plans and specifications for the improvements to be maintained and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective lots and parcels of land within Assessment District No. 20; and (c) the assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed maintenance of improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in Assessment District No. 20 in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from the maintenance, and of the expenses incidental thereto.

5. The Engineer’s Report, the Assessment Diagram, and the assessment contained therein for the payment of the costs of the maintenance and servicing of the improvements in Assessment District No. 20 for FY 2023-24 are confirmed and are hereby levied. The adoption and approval of the Engineer’s Report as a whole, and of the plans and specifications, estimate of costs and expenses, the diagram and the assessment, as contained in the report, as herein above determined and ordered, is intended to and shall refer and apply to the report, or any portion thereof.

6. Based upon oral and documentary evidence, including the Engineer's Report, offered and received at the hearing, this City Council expressly finds and determines that: (a) each of the several lots, parcels of land, and property will be specially benefited by the installation and maintenance of the improvements, (b) the amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel will not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel;

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: AD 20 Proposed Resolution (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) and (c) there is substantial evidence to support, and the weight of the evidence preponderates in favor of, the aforesaid finding and determination as to special benefits.

7. Immediately, upon the adoption of this resolution, but in no event later than August 10, 2023, following such adoption, the City Clerk, shall file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment and a certified copy of this resolution with the Auditor of the County of Contra Costa. Upon such filing, the County Auditor shall enter the assessment thereupon as shown in the Engineer’s Report. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes and all laws applying to the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. After collection, the assessments (after deduction of any costs of collections), shall be paid to the City of Pleasant Hill.

8. Upon receipt of the money representing the collection of the assessments, the City shall deposit said collections in a special fund to be used for the costs of the improvements herein ordered.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 5 th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: AD 20 Proposed Resolution (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24)

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20
May 2023

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500
Concord, CA 94520
www.weareharris.com

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24

TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER….……………………………………………………………..1 PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS……………………………………………………………………..3 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COSTS………………………………………………………………………………….5 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ………………………………………………………………………….14 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT……………………………………………………………….15 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL…………………………………………………………………………..24 APPENDIX B – DISTRICT DIAGRAM………….……………………………………………………………...40 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT PARCELS IN CITY OF CONCORD………….………………………………41

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
AGENCY: CITY OF PLEASANT HILL
PROJECT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for Assessment District No. 20 (“District”) of the City of Pleasant Hill, to levy an assessment for landscaping and lighting services upon each lot or parcel of land in the District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 (“FY 23/24”).

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Pleasant Hill’s Resolution being adopted by the City Council for the:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 20
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART 1
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City and are hereby made a part of this Report by reference.

PART 2
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for FY 23/24.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
2 PART 3
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the office of the City Clerk.

PART 4
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments as adopted by the City Council, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established at the time of formation. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Assessment Roll
Appendix B – District Diagram
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of , 2023
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
3 PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Assessment District No. 20 (Commercial Landscaping and Lighting) (“AD 20” or “District”) was formed in 1988 in order to provide and preserve a high level of landscape maintenance and street lighting on commercial streets within the District. AD 20 consists of six zones. They are managed as six separate accounts within the existing District. The locations of these zones are described in the table below, and are also shown on the Assessment Diagram included as Appendix B of this Report.

The Assessment Diagram, included herein as Appendix B, refers to the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for an exact description of the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District.

Zone General Locations
1 Consists of several areas along Contra Costa Boulevard, Chilpaningo Parkway, Golf Club Road, Ellinwood Drive, Woodsworth Lane, Cleaveland Road and Gregory Lane.

The Zone runs from the Pleasant Hill City limits to the north, to Gregory Lane to the south, and includes the Target and Sun Valley Shopping Centers. This zone also includes 17 parcels within the City limits of the City of Concord. 2 Located north of Hookston Road, south of Monument Drive, east of the I-680 freeway and west of Buskirk Avenue. Zone 2 also includes an area north of Lisa Lane between the Iron Horse Regional Trail and Monument Boulevard.
3 Consists of five non-contiguous areas. One is located along Oak Park Boulevard and Putnum Boulevard, between Monte Cresta Avenue and Keats Circle; the second is located along Oak Park Boulevard, west of the I-680 freeway; the third is generally located north of Coggins Drive, south of Mayhew Way and east of the I-680 freeway; the fourth is generally bounded by Astrid Drive on the south, the I-680 freeway to the east and the EBMUD Trail to the west; the fifth is generally bounded by Monument Boulevard to the north, Mayhew Way to the south, the Pleasant Hill City limits on the east and Vincent Drive to the west.
4 Consists of three non-contiguous areas along the north and south sides of Gregory Lane, between Twinview Drive and Khars Avenue.
5 Consists of three non-contigouous areas. One is generally on the northwest corner of Taylor Boulevard and Pleasant Hill Road, south of Paso Nogal Road; the second is on the north side of Taylor Boulevard, at Morello Avenue; and the third is along Taylor Boulevard, between Grayson Creek and the Contra Costa canal. 6 Located in the Pleasant Hill downtown area, generally bounded by Gregory Lane to the north, Boyd Road to the south, the I-680 freeway to the east and Cleaveland Road to the west.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
4 Improvements and Services Provided
The improvements and services provided in the District include the following:

1. Street Lighting Installation Maintenance and Servicing

2. Landscape Installation Maintenance and Servicing

3. Measure C Improvement Plans for Contra CostaBoulevard-Monument Boulevard - Buskirk Avenue (portions not included within Zone 6)

4. Installation Maintenance and Servicing of Appurtenant Public Facilities – Crescent Drive and Crescent Plaza
Documents for each of the above listed improvements, detailing the general nature, location, quantity and services provided are available for review in the City offices, and are incorporated herein by reference.

In Zone 6, along Crescent Drive, an irrigation and phased tree replacement study was conducted and a draft street tree inventory and sustainability guidelines book was completed, with a draft report submitted in May 2020. This study was originally budgeted in FY 18/19 but delayed until FY 19/20. Staff reviewed the draft report and shared the findings with the Downtown property manager to review a future phased tree replacement project dependent on available capital funds and reserves.

FY 23/24 Proposed Projects
Phase I of the Downtown tree replacement project along Crescent Drive was originally budgeted and proposed to be completed in FY 22/23 in Zone 6. Due to the fact that the Zone reserves were insufficient to fund the estimated $90,000, the project will be funded by outside sources. There are no new services or substantial changes in existing services proposed for FY 23/24 in the other five zones.

Sidewalk repairs
Minor repairs to grates and sidewalks have been made at various locations in the District to repair conditions caused by the City’s street trees. The City will continue to identify and address raised, sunken, cracked or broken sidewalk areas that could become potential tripping hazards to pedestrians throughout all six zones.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
5 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COST
The estimate of cost table includes, for each zone, the proposed costs for the coming fiscal year (FY 23/24), and a projection of costs for two additional fiscal years.

City Contributions
The total cost of the improvements in each zone has been reduced by a contribution from the City, as shown on the individual budget pages. The contributions in Zone 1, 2 and 3 are roughly equal to the estimated costs to maintain streetlights in these zones (formerly maintained with Uniform Street Lighting District No. 1 funds). The contribution to Zone 5-A addresses the general benefit conferred to residential properties from landscaped median maintenance on Taylor Boulevard and Pleasant Hill Road.

A $650 contribution to Zone 4 is made to offset General Benefit received from maintenance of the Canal Trail medians.

The contribution made by the City to Zone 6 offsets the estimated general benefit received by properties not within the District and the share of the City Hall maintenance not considered to be of special benefit to Zone 6 properties. The amount of this contribution is not changing from previous years, but a more in-depth look will be taken in the future.

These General Fund contributions also address any general benefits conferred to properties that may be outside the District boundary.

The table below shows an Income and Expenditure summary for all Zones.

The information shown in the table above demonstrates the downward trend of the total balances within the District.

While Interest, Assessments, General Fund Contributions and Expenses remain constant or relatively constant, the Balances continue to be depleted. This is due to additional improvements and enhancements provided by the District and City over the past several years and additional maintenance for those improvements and enhancements without an increase in assessments. Additionally, the assessment revenues in a few of the Zones are insufficient to cover annual operating expenses, including increasing utility and maintenance costs, and as a result, the balances continue to dwindle. City staff continues to monitor and evaluate the entire District and will make recommendations to reduce service levels or request increased assessments as necessary. FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 Beginning Balance - July 1 $129,998 $24,824 ($29,090)
Interest $15,117 $15,303 $15,494
Assessments $431,901 $437,220 $442,698
General Fund Contribution $97,946 $97,946 $97,946
Expenses $650,138 $604,383 $613,083
Reserve Fund Contributions/Deficits ($78,588) ($54,416) ($55,803) Annual Surplus/Deficiency $24,824 ($29,090) ($86,035)

INCOME AND EXPENSE SUMMARY

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
6 Total Reserve Balance
The Total Reserve Balance is the total of the Balance Forward, plus Revenues, minus Expenses. Any Reserve Fund Adjustments are contributions to the Reserve Fund to plan for future replacement needs or deductions from the Reserve Fund to keep the assessment at or below the Maximum Allowable Assessment for that Zone.

Budget sheets for the individual Zones are included on the following pages.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
7 Zone 1
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ (32,591) $ (94,657) $ (145,036)
Interest $ 5,589 $ 5,589 $ 5,589
Assessments $ 159,694 $ 159,694 $ 159,694
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 21,100 $ 21,100 $ 21,100 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 186,384 $ 186,384 $ 186,384

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 2,887 $ 2,974 $ 3,063
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 75,803 $ 78,077 $ 80,419 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 8,742 $ 8,829 $ 8,917 Proposition 218 Assessment Increase Project $ 14,150 $ - $ - Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance (3) $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Street Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 43,980 $ 43,980 $ 43,980
Utilities - Water $ 94,053 $ 94,053 $ 94,053
Utilities - Other $ 3,075 $ 3,075 $ 3,075
Advertising $ 529 $ 545 $ 562
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (4) $ 231 $ 231 $ 231 Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 248,449 $ 236,763 $ 239,299
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ (32,591) $ (94,657) $ (145,036) Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ (62,066) $ (50,380) $ (52,916) Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ (94,657) $ (145,036) $ (197,952) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ - $ - $ - Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ (94,657) $ (145,036) $ (197,952) Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (192 parcels) 138.352 138.352 138.352 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 1,155.60 $ 1,155.60 $ 1,155.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate(6) $ 1,155.60 $ 1,155.60 $ 1,155.60 Total Proposed Assessment $ 159,880 $ 159,880 $ 159,880 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 Costs to identify and repair large cracks & lifts in curbs and sidewalks as needed. 4 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 5
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 6 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment. * Expenditures exceed Revenue. Assessment balancing measure is needed in FY 2023/24.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
8 Zone 2
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 42,030 $ 47,708 $ 51,304
Interest $ 1,364 $ 1,364 $ 1,364
Assessments $ 38,970 $ 38,970 $ 38,970
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 25,194 $ 25,194 $ 25,194 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 65,528 $ 65,528 $ 65,528

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 530 $ 546 $ 563
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 26,112 $ 26,895 $ 27,702 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 2,252 $ 2,274 $ 2,297 Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000
Contractual Services $ - $ - $ -
Streetlight Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 3,788 $ 3,902 $ 4,019
Utilities - Water $ 22,712 $ 23,847 $ 25,039
Utilities - Other $ 145 $ 150 $ 154
Advertising $ 142 $ 146 $ 151
Supplies - Pesticides $ 106 $ 109 $ 113
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (3) $ 62 $ 62 $ 62
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 59,850 $ 61,932 $ 64,100
Reserve Balances
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 42,030 $ 47,708 $ 32,050 Reserve Fund Adjustments (4) $ 5,679 $ 2,442 $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 47,708 $ 50,150 $ 32,050 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ - $ 1,154 $ 1,428 Reserve Fund Adjustments (4) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ - $ 1,154 $ 1,428 TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 47,708 $ 51,304 $ 33,478
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (34 parcels) (5) 35.641 35.641 35.641 Total Assessable Linear Feet 2,497.87 2,497.87 2,497.87 Proposed Assessment Rate/Acre $ 774.00 $ 774.00 $ 774.00 Total Assessment per Acre $ 27,586 $ 27,586 $ 27,586
Maximum Allowable Assessment per Acre(6) $ 774.00 $ 774.00 $ 774.00 Proposed Assessment Rate/LF $ 4.58 $ 4.58 $ 4.58
Total Assessment per/LF $ 11,440 $ 11,440 $ 11,440
Maximum Allowable Assessment per/LF $ 4.58 $ 4.58 $ 4.58 Total Proposed Assessment $ 39,026 $ 39,026 $ 39,026 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 4 Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds.

Capital Reserves are being collected for irrigation repairs in the dog park. 5 Total EDU was derived by combining acreage and linear feet to determine actual assessment amounts. 6 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
9 Zone 3
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 48,367 $ 23,917 $ 23,708
Interest $ 779 $ 779 $ 779
Assessments $ 22,246 $ 22,246 $ 22,246
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 6,929 $ 6,929 $ 6,929 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 29,953 $ 29,953 $ 29,953

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 1,591 $ 1,639 $ 1,688
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 7,858 $ 8,094 $ 8,337 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 5,072 $ 5,122 $ 5,174 Replacement Project at Coggins Median (3) $ 25,000 $ - $ - Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance (4) $ 750 $ 750 $ 750
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 8,873 $ 9,140 $ 9,414
Utilities - Water $ 1,760 $ 1,848 $ 1,940
Utilities - Other $ 2,051 $ 2,112 $ 2,176
Advertising $ 312 $ 321 $ 331
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (5) $ 171 $ 171 $ 171 Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 965 $ 965 $ 965 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 54,403 $ 30,162 $ 30,945
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 27,202 $ 15,081 $ 15,473 Reserve Fund Adjustments (6) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 27,202 $ 15,081 $ 15,473 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 21,165 $ 8,836 $ 8,235 Reserve Fund Adjustments (6) $ (24,450) $ (209) $ (992) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ (3,285) $ 8,627 $ 7,244 TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 23,917 $ 23,708 $ 22,716
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (186 parcels) 80.269 80.269 80.269 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 279.27 $ 279.27 $ 279.27
Maximum Allowable Assessment (7) $ 279.27 $ 279.27 $ 279.27 Total Proposed Assessment $ 22,417 $ 22,417 $ 22,417 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 3% escalator. 3 Drought tolerant replacement project in median - currently grass. 4 Costs to identify and repair large cracks & lifts in curbs and sidewalks as needed. 5 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 6
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 7 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
10 Zone 4
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 8,469 $ 5,685 $ 2,639
Interest $ 218 $ 218 $ 218
Assessments $ 6,230 $ 6,230 $ 6,230
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ - $ - $ - SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 6,448 $ 6,448 $ 6,448

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 221 $ 227 $ 234
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 4,896 $ 5,043 $ 5,194 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 656 $ 663 $ 670 Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance $ 250 $ 250 $ 250
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 690 $ 710 $ 732
Utilities - Water $ 1,622 $ 1,703 $ 1,789
Advertising $ 41 $ 42 $ 44
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (3) $ 55 $ 55 $ 55
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 800 $ 800 $ 800 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 9,231 $ 9,495 $ 9,767
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 4,616 $ 5,685 $ 2,639 Reserve Fund Adjustments (4) $ - $ (3,046) $ (3,319)
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 4,616 $ 2,639 $ (680) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 3,853 $ - $ - Reserve Fund Adjustments (4) $ (2,783) $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 1,070 $ - $ - TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 5,685 $ 2,639 $ (680)
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (25 parcels) 10.389 10.389 10.389 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 605.00 $ 605.00 $ 605.00
Maximum Allowable Assessment (5) $ 605.00 $ 605.00 $ 605.00 Total Proposed Assessment $ 6,285 $ 6,285 $ 6,285 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 4
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 5 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
11 Zone 5-A
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 43,217 $ 43,864 $ 43,421
Interest $ 585 $ 585 $ 585
Assessments $ 16,709 $ 16,709 $ 16,709
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 14,807 $ 14,807 $ 14,807 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 32,101 $ 32,101 $ 32,101

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 243 $ 250 $ 258
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 14,322 $ 14,752 $ 15,194 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 1,288 $ 1,301 $ 1,314 Contractual Services $ - $ - $ -
Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance (3) $ 500 $ 500 $ 500
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 2,470 $ 2,544 $ 2,620
Utilities - Water $ 10,815 $ 11,356 $ 11,924
Utilities - Other $ 789 $ 813 $ 837
Advertising $ 79 $ 82 $ 84
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (4) $ 47 $ 47 $ 47
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 900 $ 900 $ 900 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 31,453 $ 32,544 $ 33,678
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 15,727 $ 16,272 $ 16,839 Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 15,727 $ 16,272 $ 16,839 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 27,490 $ 27,592 $ 26,582 Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ 647 $ (443) $ (1,577)
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 28,138 $ 27,149 $ 25,004 TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 43,864 $ 43,421 $ 41,843
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (16 parcels) 20.390 20.390 20.390 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 821.76 $ 821.76 $ 821.76
Maximum Allowable Assessment (6) $ 821.76 $ 821.76 $ 821.76 Total Proposed Assessment $ 16,756 $ 16,756 $ 16,756 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 Costs to identify and repair large cracks & lifts in curbs and sidewalks as needed. 4 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 5
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 6 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
12 Zone 5-B
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 10,622 $ 5,351 $ (856)
Interest $ 323 $ 323 $ 323
Assessments $ 9,238 $ 9,238 $ 9,238
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 12,278 $ 12,278 $ 12,278 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 21,839 $ 21,839 $ 21,839

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 202 $ 208 $ 214
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 12,687 $ 13,067 $ 13,459 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 1,133 $ 1,144 $ 1,155 Contractual Services $ - $ - $ -
Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance (3) $ 500 $ 500 $ 500
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 2,049 $ 2,110 $ 2,173
Utilities - Water $ 9,095 $ 9,550 $ 10,028
Utilities - Other $ 654 $ 674 $ 694
Advertising $ 66 $ 68 $ 70
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (4) $ 50 $ 50 $ 50
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 675 $ 675 $ 675 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 27,110 $ 28,046 $ 29,019
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 10,622 $ 5,351 $ (856) Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ (5,271) $ (6,207) $ (7,180) Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 5,351 $ (856) $ (8,036) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ - $ - $ - Reserve Fund Adjustments (5) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ 5,351 $ (856) $ (8,036)
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (27 parcels) 17.926 17.926 17.926 Proposed Assessment Rate $ 517.88 $ 517.88 $ 517.88
Maximum Allowable Assessment (6) $ 517.88 $ 517.88 $ 517.88 Total Proposed Assessment $ 9,284 $ 9,284 $ 9,284 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 3 One-time cost to identify and repair large cracks & lifts in curbs and sidewalks. 4 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 5
Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. 6 Max. Assessment rate was estabished at the time of formation. There is no allowable inflationary adjustment. * If expenditures continue at the projected rate, assessment balancing measures will be needed in FY 2025/26.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
13 Zone 6
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 9,885 $ (7,045) $ (4,270)
Interest $ 6,258 $ 6,445 $ 6,636
Assessments (1) $ 178,814 $ 184,133 $ 189,611
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 17,638 $ 17,638 $ 17,638 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 202,711 $ 208,215 $ 213,885

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (2) $ 637 $ 656 $ 675
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (2) $ 5,148 $ 5,302 $ 5,461 District Engineering and Annual Report (3) $ 2,546 $ 2,571 $ 2,597 Contractual Services/Construction (4) $ 165,614 $ 165,614 $ 165,614 Tree Replacement Project (5) $ - $ - $ -
Assessment Increase Project (5) $ 15,000 $ - $ -
Curb and Sidewalk Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Streetlight Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 18,224 $ 18,224 $ 18,224
Utilities - Water $ 11,670 $ 12,253 $ 12,866
Utilities - Other $ 400 $ 412 $ 424
Advertising $ 152 $ 157 $ 162
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (6) $ 50 $ 50 $ 50
Project Administration $ - $ - $ -
Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 219,641 $ 205,440 $ 206,274
Reserve Balance
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 9,885 $ (7,045) $ (4,270) Reserve Fund Adjustments (7) $ (16,930) $ 2,776 $ 7,611 Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ (7,045) $ (4,270) $ 3,342 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ - $ - $ - Reserve Fund Adjustments (7) $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 (7) $ - $ - $ - TOTAL RESERVE BALANCE: $ (7,045) $ (4,270) $ 3,342
Total Assessable Acreage/EDU (22 parcels) 40.294 40.294 40.294 Total Assessable Linear Feet 1,128 1,128 1,128
Proposed Assessment Rate (8) Varies Varies Varies
Maximum Allowable Assessment (9) Varies Varies Varies 1 Assessments for 2023-24 have increased by the allowable CPI. Refer to page 22 of this Report for details. 2 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 3 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years include a 1% escalator. 4 Downtown Property Management Maintenance Contract. 5 Downtown tree replacement capital project. 5 Proposed Proposition 218 assessment increase project as expenses are exceeding revenues. 6 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 7 Contributions to or Deductions from the Reserve Fund(s) to keep assessments below Max. or add to the funds. and discuss with the Downtown Prop. Manager, and perform the work when sufficient capital reserve funds are available. 8 Proposed Assessment Rates were established at the time of formation, and vary for each Zone in the District. 9 Maximum Assessment Ranges are detailed in this Engineer's Report.

Other Areas: $1,155.60 plus $4.57/LF to $1,733.40 plus $6.86/LF of parcel frontage.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures, except for water which is 5%.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
14 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of each Zone within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District has been submitted to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Pleasant Hill, and is hereby made a part of this Report by reference.

A copy of the Assessment Diagram is also included in Appendix B of the Report.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
15 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
General
Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
— Streets and Highways Code Section 22573
The 1972 Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In November 1996, the voters of California adopted Proposition 218, which has been codified as Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. Proposition 218 imposed a number of substantive and procedural requirements on taxes, assessments, and property-related fees imposed by local governments in California.

The method of apportionment described in this Report, and confirmed by the City Council, utilizes commonly accepted engineering practices established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the California Constitution for the allocation of special benefit assessments. The calculation of assessments is based upon the parcel type and the services and improvements provided to equitably apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each lot or parcel. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is over and above any general benefit conferred upon said lots or parcels or to the public at large.

Special Benefit
The improvements and associated costs have been allocated to the assessable properties within the District based upon the special benefit received by those properties. The improvements for which the properties are assessed have been identified as necessary, were installed and are being maintained as part of the development plans. As such, the costs to maintain and service the improvements are strictly the obligation of the properties within the District.

General Benefit
Although the improvements may be visible to passersby or to the public at large, the improvements were installed as a requirement of the development of the tract and are for the sole benefit of properties within the District. It has been determined however, due to limited access or use by properties or individuals outside the District, the City will contribute an amount to account for the incidental general benefits conferred to those outside properties or individuals.

The City contribution is shown on the Cost Estimate pages in Part 2 of this Report.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
16 Definition of Special Benefit
The method of apportionment described in this Report is based on the premise that each assessable parcel or unit receives distinct and special benefits from the improvements and services provided, including the visual desirability provided by well-maintained landscaping. In accordance with Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution:
“Special benefit means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or the public at large” The special benefits associated with local landscaping improvements are specifically:
 Enhanced desirability of properties due to proximity and accessibility of the improvements.  Improved aesthetic appeal provided by a positive representation of the development, neighborhood and the community.
 Improved ingress and egress to property resulting in enhanced traffic flow, reduced traffic accidents and consequent reduction of possible property damage.
 Improved traffic visibility and circulation.
 Improved accessibility for emergency vehicles.
 Reduced vandalism and other criminal activity.

ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
To impose a new assessment or increased assessment in excess of the Maximum Assessment Rate for the current fiscal year, the City must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4c that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owners must approve the proposed new or increased assessment via a property owner protest balloting process before any such new or increased assessment can be imposed. A protest occurs when, at the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots opposed to the new or increased assessment outweigh the returned ballots in favor of the new or increased assessment, weighted by the financial obligation of each parcel.

The definition of new or increased assessments includes any assessment which, 1) did not previously exist or, 2) exceeds a previously approved assessment amount or assessment range formula. Any assessment range formula must have been previously adopted by the agency and approved by the property owners.

Assessment Methodology
It is generally recognized that most budgetary items will be impacted by inflation in future years. In accordance with the California Constitution, Section 53739 (b)(1), assessments “may be adjusted for inflation pursuant to a clearly defined formula…” A formula for an inflationary adjustment is therefore included as part of the maximum assessment for this District and was approved by the property owner(s) at the time of formation. The formula, as described below, allows for annual adjustments to the budget and the assessments.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
17 The benefit formula used to determine the financial obligation for each parcel is based on the benefit received from improvements and services provided by each assessed parcel. One of the more common approaches to fairly distributing District costs to the benefitting parcels in maintenance districts such as this utilizes a methodology referred to as the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (“EDU”) method of apportionment. This method utilizes various property characteristics such as development status, type of development (land-use) and size (units or acreage) to compare the proportional benefit of each property compared to other properties benefitting from the improvements.

Each Zone in the District assesses developed property on the basis of acreage for the maintenance and operation of the District improvements. District costs include all incidentals and appurtenances related to the maintaining, operating or servicing the improvements described herein.

There are also certain parcels within Zone 2 that are assessed an additional amount based on linear foot (“LF”) of parcel frontage. The parcels affected in Zone 2 are assessed an additional $4.58/LF and are shown on the Assessment Roll.

The additional assessment for frontage funds the Measure J improvements installed along Monument Boulevard and Buskirk Avenue.

In November 2004, Contra Costa County voters approved Measure J. The measure provided for the continuation of the County's half-cent transportation sales tax measure for 25 more years. As with Measure C (the original 1988 transportation sales tax measure); Measure J revenues are used to fund a voter-approved Expenditure Plan of transportation programs and projects.

The total estimated cost of the improvements has been divided among the several parcels of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits received by the parcels benefiting from the improvements.

Zones 1 – 5
The method used by the engineer to apportion the costs among the benefitting properties follows:

1. Separate zones of service have been identified on the assessment diagram.

2. The estimated fiscal year operating cost within each Zone has been calculated, with incidental expenses and contingencies added to the operating costs in each Zone on a pro-rata basis.

3. The benefits received from the landscaping and lighting improvements relate to land area and to land use in equal proportion. Assessed area units were therefore, assigned to each parcel within the District as follows:
a) Improved parcels were assigned an EDU based on the improved acreage as determined by the County Assessor.
b) Vacant (unimproved) lots were assigned an EDU based on one-half the parcel acreage,reflecting the absence of user benefit.

4. The basic assessment for each parcel (exclusive of Measures C and J improvements) is calculated by multiplying the assigned EDU of the parcel by the assessment rate for each zone.

5. At the time of formation (1998), the City Council modified the Engineer’s Report prior to finalizing the formation of the District. The modifications included the following:

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
18 a) In Zone 5, parcel numbers 152-240-021 (currently 152-240-027); 153-040-047 and 153-050-054 were to be excluded from the assessment. These parcels are churches or civic organizations and at the time, these property types were typically not assessed due to the services they provided to the community in general. Parcel numbers 153-050-057 and 153-050-058 were also excluded since they are also a church (with a parking lot). b) In Zone 2, parcel number 148-042-005 (currently 148-042-009) had its assessment/EDU reduced by half to reflect the fact that it is and was a vacant parcel and serves as an open space area.

6. The Sun Valley Mall, in Zone 1, was assigned an EDU for a depth of 150 feet along its entire frontage for the special benefit received from the landscaping and lighting on Contra Costa Boulevard. This reduction reflects the fact that the Mall provides public landscaping and lighting on Willow Pass Road in Concord.

7. Parcels in Zone 1, APN’s 127-270-001 through 005, were assessed by the formation engineer according to the pro-rata share of the acreage of the parking area (parcel 005). The engineer applied the assessment rate to the area of parcel 005 and then spread the assessment back to the other four parcels based on the acreage percentage of those remaining parcels.

8. Parcel No. 127-032-042, in Zone 1, is a corner lot and fronts on Willow Pass Road. This parcel was assigned an EDU based one-half the parcel acreage, reflecting corner relief.

9. The combined total EDU for parcels 153-300-001, 002, 003 and 004 (formerly K Mart/Safeway), in Zone 1, were reduced by 4.17 acres reflecting a credit for the flowage easement over the property. In FY 19/20, there was a parcel merger and reconfiguration resulting in new parcel numbers 153-300-005, 008, 009 and 010.

10. In FY 22/23, Zone 1 had additional parcel changes resulting in 1 more parcel and 2.48 in additional acreage. This increased the total Zone 1 EDU from 136.213 to 138.352. APN’s 153-300-004 and 153- 300-010 became, 153-300-012; 153-300-013 and 153-300-014.

11. The total estimated costs in Zones 1 and 2 including incidental expense were reduced by a contribution from the General Fund. The amount of this contribution is based upon revenues collected pursuant to the former Pleasant Hill Unified Street Lighting District No. 1, respectively in each Zone.

12. Assessments in Zone 5 were calculated utilizing the amended methodology approved by the City Council on February 24, 1992, Resolution Number 12-92. Assessments in Zone 5 were reduced by a contribution from the City intended to offset the approximate cost to maintain the "pork chop" traffic islands at the intersection of Taylor Boulevard and Pleasant Hill Road. The rate of Zone 5 parcels on Taylor Boulevard, Civic Drive and Norse Drive was reduced by a factor of 0.63, reflecting the reduced maintenance costs for that area. The rate for APN’s 153-050-014, 153-050-052 (the Pleasant Hill Executive Park) and 153-050-059 (the former American States Insurance parcel) were not reduced, reflecting increased user benefit for these parcels due to additional floor space, as these parcels contain 2-story buildings. Beginning in FY 20/21, the budget for Zone 5 was split into two separate budgets (5A and 5B), to reflect the differing assessment rates described above. The total expenditures for Zone 5 are divided between 5A and 5B on a pro-rata basis, by the total EDU in each area.

Parcel areas used in this report to determine relative benefit are based upon information available with the County Assessor. All assessments have been rounded to the nearest even cent.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
19 The table below indicates the basic assessment per improved acre for each Zone. Assessments for the previous two years and the assessment per lineal foot for Measure J improvements in Zone 2 are also indicated.

Assessment Rates – Zones 1 through 5
Zone Location FY 21/22
Rate
FY 22/23
Rate
Proposed
FY 23/24
Rate
1 C.C. Blvd, Chilpancingo Pkwy, Golf Club Rd, Ellinwood Dr, Woodsworth Ln, Cleaveland Rd & Gregory Ln $1,155.60 $1,155.60 $1,155.60 2* Monument Blvd, Buskirk Ave & Lisa Ln $774.00 $774.00 $774.00 Measure J (Linear Foot) $4.58 $4.58 $4.58
3 Hookston Rd, Estland Way, Vincent Rd, Oak Park Blvd,
Buskirk Ave, Coggins Dr & N. Main St $279.27 $279.27 $279.27 4 Pleasant Hill Rd & Gregory Ln $605.00 $605.00 $605.00 5A & 5B Pleasant Hill Rd, Taylor Blvd, Morello Ave, Civic Dr, Norse Dr, Apollo Way & Devon Ave.
$821.76
$517.88
$821.76
$517.88
$821.76
$517.88
Assessment Range Formula for Zones 1 through 5
At the time of formation, the assessment levied per EDU for Zones 1 through 5 were established as shown above. There is no provision to increase the established assessment rate for these Zones. If the assessment rate in any year is proposed to exceed the established rate, the City must comply with Article XIII D, Section 4c of the California Constitution.
*During a routine parcel audit performed by Harris & Associates, the Formation Engineer’s Report for AD 20 was reviewed as a reference source. The initial assessment rate for Zone 2 was established at $774.00 when the District was formed (FY 88/89). This rate was approved by the property owner(s) at that time and was authorized by the City Council. California Government Code Section 53753 (2), (B) states that a previously approved tax, fee, assessment or charge, so long as it is not increased beyond the previously approved rate, is not considered an “increased” assessment.

Because the City Council initially authorized an assessment rate for Zone 2 of $774.00, Zone 2 was assessed at that rate again beginning in FY 21/22. The additional assessment revenue resulting from assessing the authorized rate for Zone 2 was anticipated to eliminate the Zone deficit within a period of approximately four years however, due to cost reductions in FY 21/22 in combination with the $774.00 assessment, the fund is currently balanced.

Zone 6
All of the improvements to be serviced and maintained within Zone 6 of the assessment district have been constructed for the benefit of the properties within the Zone and are of special benefit to those properties. The maintenance and servicing of the improvements enhances the quality of life on a daily basis by providing an attractive, clean, safe and secure environment in which to live and work.

Benefit Assumptions

1. Certain parcels formerly within Zone 1, and not also within Subdivision 8240 “Downtown Pleasant Hill” (Tract 8240), are specially benefitted by the landscaping and lighting improvements on Contra Costa Boulevard, Monument Boulevard, Boyd Road, North Main Street and Cleveland Road. These parcels are identified as: 1) the Terraces; 2) the Courtyard Hotel and Courtyard Shopping Center; 3) the Cal Fed

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
20 Bank Building (now Citi Bank); 4) the Wells Fargo Building; 5) the Hotel site south of Boyd Road at N.

Main Street (Hyatt House). These properties primarily benefit from the former Zone 1 benefit derived by these properties, and continues to be proportionate to those improvements (i.e. with or without the Measure C supplement). As such, these properties are assessed at the Zone 1 rate, with applicable linear footage also assessed.

2. The benefit received by parcels assessed within Tract 8240 is proportionate to the area of the parcel as it relates to the total area within Tract 8240. These lots appear on the recorded final map of Tract 8240, lots A, B, C, D, E, H, I, J and K. Parcel area, as it relates to parcel use, is an effective measurement of the special benefit received by each parcel respectively from the improvements. Parcels F and G are residential properties not included in the District.

3. The City Hall property benefits from the maintenance of landscaping and lighting improvements, particularly the maintenance of the frontage improvements on Gregory Lane, Cleaveland Road and Trelany Road. These benefits constitute special benefit and are assessable. The City however pays for the maintenance costs in lieu of paying the assessment.

4. Additionally, maintenance of the landscaping and lighting improvements at City Hall is of special benefit to the properties adjoining Tract 8240.

5. The following parcels receive no special benefit from the improvements:
a. 150-300-041 (Park at City Hall)
b. 149-110-056 (Soldiers Memorial Monument)
c. 148-020-012 (Contra Costa Boulevard)
(a and b are sources rather than recipients of benefit; c is a road right of way)

6. General Benefits are those benefits derived by property or persons outside the District. The properties on the west side of Cleaveland Road that are not in the District, benefit from the improvements on Cleaveland Road. These benefits are not assessable to parcels in Zone 6.

General Benefit

1. The City Hall frontage benefit is estimated at Zone 1 rates as shown in the table below. As previously stated, the City performs the maintenance of these improvements and is therefore not assessed.

APN Zone 1 Rate Area Amount
150-181-050 $1,155.60 3.560 $4,113.94

2. General benefit for the parcels along the west side of Cleaveland Road are estimated based upon parcel area and Zone 1 rates to be:

APN(s) Zone 1 Rate Area Amount
150-170-073 $1,155.60 0.97 $1,120.93
Bk 150 Pg 23 (Tr. 5647) $1,155.60 1.40 $1,617.84
Bk 150 Pg 25 (Tr. 235771) $1,155.60 0.83 $959.15
$3,697.92

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
21 3. The City contribution for benefits received by Parcels F and G of Tract 8240 (residential parcels) and #70 Cleaveleand Road is estimated as 50% of the Zone 6 assessment that would otherwise apply ($6,634.00 in FY 99/00 and $9,288.00 maximum).

4. The contribution from former Zone 1 General Fund is considered to offset any general benefit not linked to property on Contra Costa Boulevard and Monument Boulevard ($6,930.00).

5. The benefits received by properties in Zone 6, other than City Hall, from the maintenance of the grounds at City Hall was estimated in the initial report (August 1999) to be equal to $42,851 - $35,039 or $7,812.00. The general benefit contribution is reduced by this amount.

A summary of the Zone 6 general benefit contribution is shown on the table below:

Summary of Zone 6 General Benefit Contribution
City Hall Frontage (Zone 1 Transfer) $4,113.94
West side of Cleaveland Road $3,697.92
Parcels F & G $6,634.00
Zone 1 General Fund $6,930.00
Less Zone 6 benefit from City Hall ($7,812.00)
Total Zone General Benefit $13,563.86
Calculation of Zone 6 Assessments:

The net cost of the improvements within Zone 6 has been divided among the several parcels of land within the Zone in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by the parcels benefiting from the improvements.

The method used to calculate the assessment for each parcel follows:

1. The assessment rates per acre for the following Assessor’s Parcel Numbers are assigned at the F Y 98/99 Zone 1 rates ($1,155.60). The assessment for these parcels also includes a rate of $4.57 per linear foot of street frontage. The assessment calculation for these parcels is shown on the Assessment Roll in Appendix A. See “Benefit Assumptions”, #1.

APN Description
148-020-010 Terraces
127-110-026 Courtyard Hotel
127-110-027 Courtyard Center
150-300-015
150-210-059
Citi Bank (formerly Wells Fargo)

2. Incidental expenses include the cost of the Engineer’s Report, legal costs, advertising costs and City staff time in coordinating the annual levy process for the District.

3. The net amount to be assessed is calculated as the total Zone 6 maintenance plus incidental expenses, less the City Contributions as shown.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
22 The maximum assessment to the Tract 8240 lots in any future year subject to adjustment by the CPI will be calculated according to the method described for the FY 99/00 fiscal year substituting the amounts indicated in Part 2C of the initial report under the column entitled “Maximum Zone 6”. The maximum assessments for the Terraces and other parcels not within Tract 8240 assume a 50% increase in the maintenance effort and cost on Contra Costa and Monument Boulevards within Zone 6.

Assessment Range Formula – Zone 6
Each year, the Maximum Assessment rate shall be increased for inflation by the annual change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), during the preceding calendar year, for All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward areas, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Should the stated index be discontinued, a reasonably equivalent index should be utilized annually. The actual annual assessment rate levied in any fiscal year for Zone 6 may not exceed the established maximum allowed (adjusted by CPI) annual assessment rate for that year without receiving property owner approval for the increase. The actual assessment rate shall be as approved by the City Council, not to exceed the maximum allowed annual assessment rate for such fiscal year.

For FY 23/24, the Maximum Assessment Rate for Tract 8240 is proposed to be increased by the annual CPI of 5.59%.

This results in an assessment rate per acre of $7,545.34. The following tablestrack the Maximum Assessment (adjusted annually) as well as the Actual Assessment applied during that fiscal year.

Tract 8240 CPI History
Other Zone 6 Parcels CPI History (Acreage)
Fiscal Annual CPI Adjusted Max. Actual
Year CPI % Calculation Assessment/Acre Assessment/Acre
2019/2020 N/A N/A $6,614.00 $6,614.00
2020/2021 2.90% 1.029000001 $6,805.81 $6,805.81
2021/2022 1.72% 1.017220105 $6,923.00 $6,923.00
2022/2023 3.21% 1.032114341 $7,145.33 $7,145.33
2023/2024 5.59% 1.055982642 $7,545.34 $7,545.34
Fiscal Annual CPI CPI Change to Min. Assessment Max. Assessment Actual Year CPI % Calculation Rate/Acre Range/Acre Range/Acre Rate Applied 2019/2020 N/A N/A $1,155.60 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,155.60 2020/2021 2.9% 1.029000001 $1,189.11 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,155.60 2021/2022 1.72% 1.017220105 $1,209.59 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,155.60 2022/2023 3.21% 1.032114341 $1,248.43 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,192.71 2023/2024 5.59% 1.055982642 $1,318.32 $1,155.60 $1,733.40 $1,259.48

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 20
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
23 Other Zone 6 Parcels CPI History (Linear Foot)
The proposed CPI increase for Tract 8240 this year, as well as the increases up to the maximum amounts for acreage and linear foot for the other Zone 6 parcels, is necessary because expenses are exceeding revenues for the Zone. If this trend continues, a Proposition 218 property owner ballot measure will be required in order to increase assessments beyond the current maximums
Operating Reserve
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by collection of assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments or to fund costs which are greater than revenue from the assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. The estimated beginning and ending Operating Reserve fund balances for FY 23/24 are shown in the Cost Estimate table.

Section 22569 (a) of the 1972 Act allows the District assessments to “…include a reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the city expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the county, whichever is later.” Capital Reserve
In addition to the Operating Reserve as detailed above, an agency may create a capital reserve to fund items that will require replacement at some point, due to limited useful life. These items may include but are not limited to the asphalt path in each subdivision, sidewalks, street trees, streetlights, etc. The estimated beginning and ending Capital Reserve fund balances for FY 23/24 are shown in the Cost Estimate table.

Any additional surplus funds, in excess of the 50% Operating Reserve or identified Capital Reserve costs, must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

Fiscal Annual CPI CPI Change to Min. Assessment Max. Assessment Actual Year CPI % Calculation Rate/Acre Range/Acre Range/Acre Rate Applied 2019/2020 N/A N/A $4.57 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86
2020/2021 2.9% 1.029000001 $4.70 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86
2021/2022 1.72% 1.017220105 $4.78 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86
2022/2023 3.21% 1.032114341 $4.94 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86
2023/2024 5.59% 1.055982642 $5.21 $4.57 $6.86 $6.86

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
24 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel Identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be based on available parcel maps and other property data from the Contra Costa County Assessor’s office as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and adopted by the City Council.

A listing of parcels assessed within the District for FY 23/24, along with the corresponding assessment amounts, is included on the following pages. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report.

Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

Non-assessable lots or parcels include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-way, including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-way; common areas; landlocked parcels; small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed or has specific development restrictions. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore, exempted from assessment.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
25 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
125-050-0131 0.357 0.357 $1,155.60 $412.54
125-050-0251 1.23 1.23 $1,155.60 $1,421.38
125-050-0271 0.03 0.03 $1,155.60 $34.66
125-050-0281 3.822 3.32199 $1,155.60 $3,838.90
125-250-0041 0.855 0.855 $1,155.60 $988.04
125-250-0081 0.67 0.67 $1,155.60 $774.26
125-250-0111 0.306 0.306 $1,155.60 $353.62
125-250-0121 0.627 0.627 $1,155.60 $724.56
125-250-0141 0.467 0.467 $1,155.60 $539.66
125-250-0171 0.627 0.627 $1,155.60 $724.56
125-250-0181 0.0030 $1,155.60 $0.00
125-250-0211 0.77 0.77 $1,155.60 $889.82
125-250-0231 0.67 0.67 $1,155.60 $774.26
125-250-0241 0.025 0.025 $1,155.60 $28.90
125-250-0251 0.87 0.87 $1,155.60 $1,005.38
127-032-0351 0.18 0.18 $1,155.60 $208.00
127-032-0381 0.81 0.81 $1,155.60 $936.04
127-032-0391 0.93 0.93 $1,155.60 $1,074.70
127-032-0421 0.86 0.43001 $1,155.60 $496.92
127-032-0431 0.48 0.48 $1,155.60 $554.68
127-032-0441 0.377 0.377 $1,155.60 $435.66
127-032-0451 0.55 0.55 $1,155.60 $635.58
127-032-0461 0.36 0.36 $1,155.60 $416.02
127-040-0141 0.090 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-040-0191 0.74 0.74 $1,155.60 $855.14
127-040-0201 0.967 0.967 $1,155.60 $1,117.46
127-050-0401 0.180 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-050-0521 0.589 0.589 $1,155.60 $680.64
127-050-0531 0.118 0.118 $1,155.60 $136.36
127-050-0541 0.159 0.159 $1,155.60 $183.74
127-050-0571 0.0374 0.0374 $1,155.60 $43.22
127-050-0581 0.13 0.13 $1,155.60 $150.22
127-050-0641 0.56 0.56 $1,155.60 $647.14
127-050-0651 0.29 0.29 $1,155.60 $335.12
127-050-0671 0.42 0.42 $1,155.60 $485.36
127-050-0681 0.61 0.61 $1,155.60 $704.92
127-050-0691 3.40 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-050-0701 1.343 0.4477 $1,155.60 $517.36
127-061-0261 1.49 1.49 $1,155.60 $1,721.84
127-061-0301 0.975 0.975 $1,155.60 $1,126.72
127-081-0031 0.24 0.12 $1,155.60 $138.68

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
26 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
127-081-0041 0.760 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-081-0431 0.52 0.52 $1,155.60 $600.92
127-081-0471 1.44 1.44 $1,155.60 $1,664.06
127-081-0481 1.03 1.03 $1,155.60 $1,190.26
127-081-0511 0.71 0.71 $1,155.60 $820.48
127-180-0551 2.54 2.54 $1,155.60 $2,935.22
127-180-0561 1.347 0.674 $1,155.60 $778.88
127-180-0581 1.453 1.453 $1,155.60 $1,679.08
127-210-0131 2.18 2.18 $1,155.60 $2,519.20
127-210-0141 3.880 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0221 0.250 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0271 5.090 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0311 2.43 2.43 $1,155.60 $2,808.10
127-210-0361 1.410 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0371 9.490 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-210-0381 0.70 $1,155.60 $0.00
127-270-0011 0.228 0.711 $1,155.60 $821.64
127-270-0021 0.232 0.711 $1,155.60 $821.64
127-270-0031 0.794 2.56 $1,155.60 $2,958.34
127-270-0041 0.977 3.129 $1,155.60 $3,615.88
127-270-0051 7.1110 $1,155.60 $0.00
150-052-0091 3.616 3.616 $1,155.60 $4,178.64
150-101-0121 0.21 0.21 $1,155.60 $242.68
150-102-0121 0.2 0.2 $1,155.60 $231.12
150-102-0131 0.23 0.23 $1,155.60 $265.78
150-102-0141 0.260 $1,155.60 $0.00
150-103-0081 0.48 0.48 $1,155.60 $554.68
150-103-0131 0.16 0.16 $1,155.60 $184.90
150-103-0161 0.48 0.48 $1,155.60 $554.68
150-121-0021 0.24 0.24 $1,155.60 $277.34
150-123-0231 0.95 0.95 $1,155.60 $1,097.82
150-123-0241 0.18 0.18 $1,155.60 $208.00
150-123-0251 0.346 0.346 $1,155.60 $399.84
150-123-0271 0.33 0.33 $1,155.60 $381.34
150-123-0281 1.02 1.02 $1,155.60 $1,178.72
150-125-0111 0.168 0.168 $1,155.60 $194.14
150-150-0121 0.34 0.34 $1,155.60 $392.90
150-150-0191 0.28 0.28 $1,155.60 $323.56
150-150-0401 0.66 0.66 $1,155.60 $762.70
150-150-0551 0.2 0.2 $1,155.60 $231.12
150-150-0581 0.62 0.62 $1,155.60 $716.48

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
27 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
150-150-0661 0.428 0.428 $1,155.60 $494.60
150-150-0791 1.06 1.06 $1,155.60 $1,224.94
150-150-0801 1.431 1.431 $1,155.60 $1,653.66
150-170-0741 1.511 1.511 $1,155.60 $1,746.12
150-220-0561 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0571 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0581 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0591 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0601 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0611 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0621 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0631 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0641 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0651 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0661 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0671 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0681 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0691 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0701 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0711 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0721 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0731 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0741 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0751 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0761 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0771 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0781 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0791 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0801 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0811 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0821 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0831 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-220-0841 0.058 0.058 $1,155.60 $67.02
150-240-0461 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0471 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0481 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0491 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0501 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0511 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0521 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0531 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
28 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
150-240-0541 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0551 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0561 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0571 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0581 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0591 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0601 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0611 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0621 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0631 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0641 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0651 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0661 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0671 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-240-0681 0.051 0.051 $1,155.60 $58.94
150-290-0011 0.096 0.096002077 $1,155.60 $110.94
150-290-0021 0.097 0.097005884 $1,155.60 $112.10
150-290-0031 0.170 0.170006923 $1,155.60 $196.46
150-290-0041 0.205 0.205001731 $1,155.60 $236.90
150-290-0051 0.5680 $1,155.60 $0.00
153-030-0771 1.486 1.486 $1,155.60 $1,717.22
153-030-0891 0.995 0.995 $1,155.60 $1,149.82
153-030-0901 0.74 0.74 $1,155.60 $855.14
153-030-0951 2.474 2.474 $1,155.60 $2,858.96
153-030-1061 18.396 18.396 $1,155.60 $21,258.42
153-030-1071 0.771 0.771 $1,155.60 $890.96
153-081-0121 0.36 0.36 $1,155.60 $416.02
153-081-0141 0.24 0.24 $1,155.60 $277.34
153-081-0151 1.67 1.67 $1,155.60 $1,929.86
153-121-0381 2.68 2.68 $1,155.60 $3,097.00
153-134-0251 0.307 0.307 $1,155.60 $354.76
153-134-0261 0.941 0.941 $1,155.60 $1,087.42
153-222-0011 0.18 0.18 $1,155.60 $208.00
153-222-0021 0.2 0.2 $1,155.60 $231.12
153-223-0121 0.180 $1,155.60 $0.00
153-223-0161 0.18 0.18 $1,155.60 $208.00
153-223-0191 0.36 0.36 $1,155.60 $416.02
153-230-0031 0.19 0.18599862 $1,155.60 $214.94
153-230-0041 0.09 0.09300796 $1,155.60 $107.48
153-230-0051 0.93 0.92900658 $1,155.60 $1,073.56
153-230-0071 1.00 0.99899619 $1,155.60 $1,154.44

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
29 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
153-230-0211 0.30 0.3 $1,155.60 $346.68
153-230-0221 5.59 5.59200415 $1,155.60 $6,462.12
153-230-0231 0.30 0.3 $1,155.60 $346.68
153-230-0241 0.60 0.59899619 $1,155.60 $692.20
153-230-0251 2.30 2.29700588 $1,155.60 $2,654.42
153-250-0031 0.582 0.582 $1,155.60 $672.56
153-250-0041 0.554 0.554 $1,155.60 $640.20
153-250-0051 0.649 0.649 $1,155.60 $749.98
153-250-0061 0.303 0.303 $1,155.60 $350.14
153-250-0071 4.678 4.678 $1,155.60 $5,405.90
153-250-0081 0.72 0.72 $1,155.60 $832.04
153-250-0091 0.37 0.37 $1,155.60 $427.58
153-270-0011 0.37 0.37 $1,155.60 $427.58
153-270-0021 0.57 0.57 $1,155.60 $658.70
153-270-0031 0.69 0.69 $1,155.60 $797.36
153-270-0041 1.01 1.01 $1,155.60 $1,167.16
153-270-0061 0.83 0.83 $1,155.60 $959.14
153-270-0071 0.4 0.4 $1,155.60 $462.24
153-270-0101 0.625 0.625 $1,155.60 $722.26
153-270-0111 1.56 1.56 $1,155.60 $1,802.74
153-270-0131 0.72 0.72 $1,155.60 $832.04
153-270-0141 2.13 2.13 $1,155.60 $2,461.42
153-270-0151 0.29 0.29 $1,155.60 $335.12
153-300-0041 0.58 0.58 $1,155.60 $670.24
153-300-0051 1.62 0.00 $1,155.60 $0.00
153-300-0081 9.95 7.76 $1,155.60 $8,967.46
153-300-0091 2.322 $1,155.60 $2,080.08
153-300-0101 5.77 4.50 $1,155.60 $5,200.20
172.92 136.213 $157,407.84

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
30 APN Zone Acres EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/Acre
FY 23/24
Assessment
/Acre LF Rate L.F.

FY 23/24 LF
Assessment
FY 23/24
Total
Assessment
147-050-033 2 0.099 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
147-050-043 2 0.897 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
147-050-044 2 0.803 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
147-050-050 2 0.883 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-012 2 0.57 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-013 2 0.31 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-019 2 0.278 0.139 $774.00 $107.60 $107.60
148-010-020 2 0.137 0.137 $774.00 $106.04 $106.04
148-010-021 2 0.139 0.139 $774.00 $107.58 $107.58
148-010-022 2 0.34 0.34 $774.00 $263.16 $263.16
148-010-023 2 1.59 1.59 $774.00 $1,230.66 $1,230.66
148-010-024 2 0.36 0.36 $774.00 $278.64 $278.64
148-010-026 2 0.314 0.314 $774.00 $243.04 $243.04
148-010-027 2 2.68 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-028 2 0.55 0.55 $774.00 $425.70 $425.70
148-010-029 2 1 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-010-030 2 0.47 0.47 $774.00 $363.78 $363.78
148-031-008 2 2.167 2.167 $774.00 $1,677.26 $4.58 300.58 $1,376.66 $3,053.92 148-031-010 2 5.447 5.447 $774.00 $4,215.98 $4.58 402.93 $1,845.42 $6,061.40 148-031-011 2 0.547 0.547 $774.00 $423.38 $4.58 104.78 $479.89 $903.28 148-041-028 2 1.23 1.23 $774.00 $952.02 $4.58 95.94 $439.41 $1,391.44 148-041-029 2 1.971 1.971 $774.00 $1,525.55 $4.58 96.04 $439.86 $1,965.42 148-041-030 2 0.631 0.631 $774.00 $488.39 $4.58 138.28 $633.32 $1,121.72 148-041-035 2 0.706 0.706 $774.00 $546.44 $4.58 29.32 $134.29 $680.74 148-041-036 2 5.482 5.482 $774.00 $4,243.07 $4.58 607 $2,780.06 $7,023.14 148-041-037 2 0.254 0.254 $774.00 $196.60 $4.58 276 $1,264.08 $1,460.68 148-042-009 2 1.88 0.94 $774.00 $727.56 $4.58 447 $2,047.26 $2,774.82 148-053-013 2 0.015 0 $774.00 $0.00 2497.87 $11,440.24 $0.00 148-066-009 2 0.015 0 $774.00 $0.00 $0.00
148-090-032 2 0.42 0.42 $774.00 $325.08 $325.08
148-090-033 2 0.58 0.58 $774.00 $448.92 $448.92
148-090-034 2 6.78 6.78 $774.00 $5,247.72 $5,247.72
148-090-035 2 1.78 1.78 $774.00 $1,377.72 $1,377.72
148-090-039 2 2.667 2.667 $774.00 $2,064.26 $2,064.26

41.31 35.64102 $27,586.15 $11,440.24 $39,026.46

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
31 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
148-070-0023 0.3 0.3 $279.27 $83.78
148-070-0033 0.31 0.31 $279.27 $86.58
148-070-0043 3.290 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0213 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0223 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0233 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0243 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0253 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0263 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0273 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0283 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0293 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0303 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0313 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0323 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0333 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0343 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0353 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0363 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0373 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0383 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0393 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0403 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0413 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0423 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0433 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0443 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0453 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0463 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0473 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0483 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0493 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0503 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0513 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0523 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0533 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0543 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0553 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0563 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0573 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0583 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
32 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
148-070-0593 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0603 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0613 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0623 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0633 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0643 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-070-0653 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0663 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0673 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0683 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0693 0.120 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0073 0.40 $279.27 $0.00
148-070-0153 0.236 0.236 $279.27 $65.90
148-070-0173 0.52 0.52 $279.27 $145.22
148-070-0203 1.387 1.387 $279.27 $387.34
148-090-0083 0.105 0.105 $279.27 $29.32
148-090-0283 0.89 0.89 $279.27 $248.56
148-100-0243 0.33 0.33 $279.27 $92.16
148-100-0393 1.170 $279.27 $0.00
148-100-0453 2.47 2.47 $279.27 $689.80
148-100-0563 0.0050 $279.27 $0.00
148-100-0583 3.108 3.108 $279.27 $867.98
148-100-0593 4.371 4.371 $279.27 $1,220.68
148-100-0633 0.248 0.248 $279.27 $69.26
148-100-0643 1.825 1.825 $279.27 $509.66
148-360-0083 1.12 1.12 $279.27 $312.78
148-360-0103 6.072 6.072 $279.27 $1,695.72
148-360-0243 0.750 $279.27 $0.00
148-360-0273 4.9560 $279.27 $0.00
148-360-0283 1.615 1.615 $279.27 $451.02
148-360-0303 4.013 4.013 $279.27 $1,120.72
148-360-0313 2.5470 $279.27 $0.00
148-372-0073 0.94 0.94 $279.27 $262.52
148-372-0083 14.883 14.883 $279.27 $4,156.38
148-372-0103 0.67 0.67 $279.27 $187.12
148-372-0123 1.02 1.02 $279.27 $284.86
148-372-0133 0.66 0.66 $279.27 $184.32
148-372-0143 1.04 1.04 $279.27 $290.44
148-371-0103 0.29 0.29 $279.27 $80.98
148-371-0113 0.755 0.755 $279.27 $210.84
148-371-012311 $279.27 $279.28

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
33 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
148-371-013311 $279.27 $279.28
148-371-0143 0.651 0.651 $279.27 $181.80
148-371-0153 1.748 1.748 $279.27 $488.16
148-490-0013 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0023 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0033 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0043 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0053 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0063 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0073 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0083 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0093 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0103 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0113 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0123 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0133 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0143 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0153 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0163 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0173 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0183 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0193 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0203 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0213 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0223 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0233 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0243 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0253 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-026300 $279.27 $0.00
148-490-0283 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0293 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0303 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0313 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0323 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0333 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0343 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0353 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0363 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0373 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0383 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0393 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
34 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
148-490-0403 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0413 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0423 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0433 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0443 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0453 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0463 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0473 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-0483 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
148-490-049300 $279.27 $0.00
149-110-0873 0.140 $279.27 $0.00
149-122-0013 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
149-122-0023 0.039 0.039 $279.27 $10.90
149-122-0173 0.360 $279.27 $0.00
149-122-0213 0.514 0.514 $279.27 $143.54
149-122-0233 0.039 0.039 $279.27 $10.90
149-122-0243 0.5170 $279.27 $0.00
149-122-0263 1.858 1.858 $279.27 $518.88
149-122-0273 0.073 0.073 $279.27 $20.38
149-122-0283 0.293 0.293 $279.27 $81.82
149-241-0103 0.262 0.262 $279.27 $73.16
149-253-0133 0.32 0.32 $279.27 $89.36
149-253-0163 0.228 0.228 $279.27 $63.68
149-253-0283 0.22 0.22 $279.27 $61.44
149-253-0293 0.294 0.294 $279.27 $82.10
149-270-0063 0.41 0.41 $279.27 $114.50
149-270-0083 0.43 0.43 $279.27 $120.08
149-270-0363 1.50 $279.27 $0.00
149-270-0373 1.41 1.41 $279.27 $393.78
149-270-0383 0.12 0.12 $279.27 $33.52
149-270-0393 1.26 1.26 $279.27 $351.88
149-284-0053 0.21 0.21 $279.27 $58.64
149-284-0063 2.626 2.626 $279.27 $733.36
149-284-0073 0.159 0.159 $279.27 $44.40
149-284-0083 0.145 0.145 $279.27 $40.50
149-284-0123 0.277 0.277 $279.27 $77.36
170-040-0433 0.11 0.11 $279.27 $30.72
170-040-0443 0.33 0.33 $279.27 $92.16
170-040-0583 0.23 0.23 $279.27 $64.24
170-050-0013 0.31 0.31 $279.27 $86.58
170-050-0033 0.24 0.24 $279.27 $67.02

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
35 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
170-050-026 3 0.59 0 $279.27 $0.00
170-050-028 3 0.39 0.39 $279.27 $108.92
170-050-029 3 0.23 0.23 $279.27 $64.24
170-050-031 3 0.32 0.32 $279.27 $89.36
170-050-032 3 0.74 0 $279.27 $0.00
170-061-022 3 0.23 0.23 $279.27 $64.24
170-061-024 3 0.321 0.321 $279.27 $89.64
170-091-006 3 0.207 0.207 $279.27 $57.80
170-091-007 3 0.207 0.207 $279.27 $57.80
170-091-008 3 0.2 0 $279.27 $0.00
170-091-015 3 0.81 0 $279.27 $0.00
170-091-017 3 0.15 0 $279.27 $0.00
170-091-018 3 0.2 0 $279.27 $0.00
170-092-032 3 0.21 0.21 $279.27 $58.64
170-092-039 3 0.22 0.22 $279.27 $61.44
170-092-040 3 0.19 0 $279.27 $0.00
170-092-041 3 0.11 0.11 $279.27 $30.72
170-092-050 3 0.23 0.23 $279.27 $64.24
170-092-054 3 0.43 0.43 $279.27 $120.08
170-092-055 3 0.26 0.26 $279.27 $72.62
170-092-057 3 1.04 0 $279.27 $0.00
170-092-058 3 0.41 0 $279.27 $0.00
100.834 80.269 $22,417.42

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
36 APN Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
149-010-0894 0.23 0.23 $605.00 $139.16
149-010-0904 0.4 0.4 $605.00 $242.00
149-380-0014 0.181 0.181 $605.00 $109.50
149-380-0024 0.071 0.071 $605.00 $42.96
149-380-0034 0.071 0.071 $605.00 $42.96
149-380-0044 0.071 0.071 $605.00 $42.96
149-380-0054 0.123 0.123 $605.00 $74.42
149-380-0064 0.123 0.123 $605.00 $74.42
149-380-0074 0.6450 $605.00 $0.00
152-132-0464 1.23 1.23 $605.00 $744.16
152-132-0474 1.07 1.07 $605.00 $647.36
152-132-0494 1.9 1.9 $605.00 $1,149.50
152-181-0304 2.28 2.28 $605.00 $1,379.40
152-181-0484 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0494 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0504 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0514 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0524 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0534 0.14 0.14 $605.00 $84.70
152-181-0544 0.820 $605.00 $0.00
164-131-0274 0.44 0.44 $605.00 $266.20
166-060-0484 0.249 0.249 $605.00 $150.64
166-081-0314 0.41 0.41 $605.00 $248.06
166-081-0514 0.35 0.35 $605.00 $211.76
166-081-0524 0.35 0.35 $605.00 $211.76

11.854 10.389 $6,285.42

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
37 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
152-023-024 5A 0.62 0.62 $821.76 $509.50
152-030-050 5A 0.33 0.00 $821.76 $0.00
152-030-051 5A 1.4 0.00 $821.76 $0.00
152-030-052 5A 2.34 0.00 $821.76 $0.00
152-040-015 5A 0.56 0.56 $821.76 $460.18
152-040-026 5A 1.84 1.84 $821.76 $1,512.04
152-040-029 5A 0.424 0.424 $821.76 $348.42
152-040-030 5A 0.438 0.438 $821.76 $359.94
152-040-031 5A 0.55 0.00 $821.76 $0.00
153-050-014 5A 3.44 3.44 $821.76 $2,826.86
153-050-052 5A 2.911 2.911 $821.76 $2,392.14
153-050-059 5A 4.505 4.505 $821.76 $3,702.02
164-242-010 5A 0.36 0.36 $821.76 $295.84
164-242-012 5A 1.92 1.92 $821.76 $1,577.78
164-242-013 5A 0.65 0.65 $821.76 $534.14
164-242-014 5A 0.502 0.502 $821.76 $412.52
164-242-015 5A 2.22 2.22 $821.76 $1,824.30

25.01 20.390 $16,755.68

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
38 APN Zone Acreage EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
152-240-005 5B 0.498 0.498 $517.88 $257.90
152-240-007 5B 1.15 1.15 $517.88 $595.56
152-240-014 5B 1.27 1.27 $517.88 $657.70
152-240-016 5B 0.49 0.49 $517.88 $253.76
152-240-019 5B 0.5 0.50 $517.88 $258.94
152-240-020 5B 0.49 0.49 $517.88 $253.76
152-240-024 5B 1.891 1.891 $517.88 $979.32
152-240-025 5B 2.089 2.089 $517.88 $1,081.86
152-240-026 5B 0.555 0.555 $517.88 $287.42
152-240-027 5B 2.79 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-021 5B 1.04 1.04 $821.76 $538.60
153-050-031 5B 0.5 0.50 $517.88 $258.94
153-050-036 5B 1.17 1.17 $517.88 $605.92
153-050-037 5B 0.88 0.88 $517.88 $455.74
153-050-040 5B 0.99 0.99 $517.88 $512.70
153-050-046 5B 1.42 1.42 $517.88 $735.38
153-050-048 5B 0.8 0.80 $517.88 $414.30
153-050-050 5B 1.27 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-053 5B 4.06 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-057 5B 3.632 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-058 5B 1.18 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-063 5B 1.68 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-064 5B 2.25 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-065 5B 4.17 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-066 5B 3.215 0.00 $517.88 $0.00
153-050-067 5B 2.193 2.193 $517.88 $1,135.72

42.173 17.926 $9,283.52

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
39 APN Zone Acres EDU
FY 23/24
Assessment
Rate/Acre
FY 23/24
Assessment
/Acre LF Rate L.F.

FY 23/24
LF Assessment
FY 23/24
Total
Assessment
127-110-026 6 1.992 4.149 $1,259.48 $2,508.88 $6.86 546 $3,745.56 $6,254.44 127-110-027 6 6.769 9.069 $1,259.48 $8,525.42 $6.86 582 $3,992.52 $12,517.94 148-020-010 6 2.673 2.673 $1,259.48 $3,366.59 $6.86 1252 $8,591.26 $11,957.86 148-020-012 6 0.139 0 $1,259.48 $0.00 $0.00
149-110-056 6 0.25 0 $1,259.48 $0.00 $0.00
149-110-085 6 2.024 2.024 $1,259.48 $2,549.19 $2,549.18 149-110-086 6 0.868 0.868 $1,259.48 $1,093.23 $1,093.22 150-181-050 6 3.56 0 $1,259.48 $0.00 $0.00
150-210-059 6 2.33 2.33 $1,259.48 $2,934.59 $2,934.58
150-300-001 6 2.83 2.83 $7,545.34 $21,353.31 $0.00 $21,353.32 150-300-002 6 1.2 1.2 $7,545.34 $9,054.41 $0.00 $9,054.40 150-300-003 6 0.825 0.825 $7,545.34 $6,224.91 $0.00 $6,224.90 150-300-004 6 1.279 1.279 $7,545.34 $9,650.49 $0.00 $9,650.48 150-300-005 6 1.619 1.619 $7,545.34 $12,215.91 $0.00 $12,215.90 150-300-006 6 1.036 1.036 $7,545.34 $7,816.97 $0.00 $7,816.98 150-300-007 6 5.188 5.188 $7,545.34 $39,145.22 $0.00 $39,145.22 150-300-010 6 1.264 1.264 $7,545.34 $9,537.31 $0.00 $9,537.30 150-300-011 6 1.496 1.496 $7,545.34 $11,287.83 $0.00 $11,287.82 150-300-012 6 1.939 1.939 $7,545.34 $14,630.41 $0.00 $14,630.42 150-300-013 6 1.323 0 $7,545.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
150-300-014 6 0.179 0 $7,545.34 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
150-300-015 6 0.505 0.505 $1,259.48 $636.04 $0.00 $636.04

41.288 40.294 $162,530.71 $178,860.00

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
40 APPENDIX B – DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 23/24
41 APPENDIX C – CITY OF CONCORD PARCELS

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 20 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 20 Assessments FY 2023-24)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-23

APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM

AND ASSESSMENTS, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR
FY2023-2024 IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22

SYNOPSIS
An Assessment District is a financial mechanism that allows for the levy of an assessment on a specific geographic area or parcels of real estate, which have been identified as receiving a direct special “benefit” from a public service or improvement. Assessment District No. 22 (“AD 22”) enables the City to provide levels of landscape maintenance and street lighting at an enhanced level within the scenic easements in the Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk Subdivisions. The properties within the AD 22 boundaries directly benefit from these landscape and lighting improvements. The annual assessments paid by property owners within AD 22 and contributions by the City fund the maintenance and services provided.

In order for the City to continue to levy and collect assessments within AD 22 for the 2023/2024 fiscal year, an annual report must be prepared and the City must hold a public hearing. Staff requests that the City Council hold the Public Hearing and adopt the Resolution approving the Engineer’s Report, confirming the diagram and assessment, and ordering the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 for AD 22.

DISCUSSION
Background
AD 22 (Grayson Woods) was formed in 1997 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and the California Streets and Highways Code. AD 22 was amended in 2002 to include Subdivision 8304, Gallery Walk.

In order for the City to continue to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 (“FY 23/24”), a report on the proposed maintenance program must be prepared and a public hearing conducted on the budget and proposed assessments. The Engineer of Work, Harris & Associates, has completed and filed the FY 23/24 Annual Report (“Engineer’s Report”) with the City Clerk. The Engineer’s Report (Exhibit 1 to the Resolution) includes

10.2 Packet Pg. 201
descriptions of the improvements to be maintained during the fiscal year, an estimate of costs, a map of Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk, and the levy of assessments upon the benefiting properties.

Analysis
On February 6, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 7-23, a Resolution directing the preparation and filing of the 2023/2024 Engineer’s Report for maintenance of AD 22.

On May 15, 2023, the City Council preliminarily approved the Engineer’s Report for AD 22 and adopted a Resolution of Intention (“ROI”) to levy and collect assessments. In addition, the ROI provided notice of the date, time, and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the assessments within AD 22.

The collection of assessments from properties within the boundaries of AD 22, together with the funds provided by the City, will ensure continued maintenance of the lighting and landscaping improvements within the boundaries of AD 22. Maintenance staff provides for the maintenance of improvements, including weekly mowing and edging of turf; maintaining and repairing irrigation systems; pruning; removing debris and graffiti; repairing street lights; and weeding, as well as, paying for utility charges for water and electricity.

If AD 22 assessments are confirmed for FY 23/24, staff will continue to provide maintenance services for Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk. The AD revenues include $61,583 in assessments collected from property owners within AD 22, an $8,493 contribution from the General Fund, and estimated interest of $780, for a total of $70,856 in projected revenue.

The assessment rate remains at $187.50 for Gallery Walk and no new services or substantial changes in existing services are proposed.

As described in the May 2023 staff report accompanying the ROI, a potential Reliez Valley slope stabilization project has been budgeted at $25,000 for FY 22/23 in the Grayson Woods subdivision. If approved, the assessment rate in Grayson Woods will increase 5.598% above the FY 22/23 rate to maintain a healthy capital set-aside in the fund. This increase is $17.90 -- $319.84 per parcel to $337.74 per parcel. The new rate is approximately $21.26 below the Maximum (approved) Assessment Rate of $359 for Grayson Woods. Staff sent letters to all of the affected property owners and as of the submission of this staff report for the agenda packet, has not received any correspondence or calls from the noticed property owners.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Pleasant Hill will contribute approximately $8,493 ($2,437 for Grayson Woods and $6,056 for Gallery Walk) from the General Fund toward the landscape and lighting costs. This contribution is intended to offset the portion of the landscape and lighting improvements that provide benefit to the general public in areas located adjacent to public roadways within the City’s right of way. Should AD 22 not be renewed for FY 23/24, there would be a loss of $61,583 in assessment revenues to fund maintenance activities within AD 22.

10.2 Packet Pg. 202

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Open, conduct, and close the Public Hearing and adopt the Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Report, confirming the diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment for FY 2023/2024.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Should the Assessment District not be renewed for FY 2023/24, the City would need to fund these maintenance activities or services would need to be suspended or substantially reduced.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Engineer’s Report
Prepared by: Ann James, Public Works Manager
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

10.2 Packet Pg. 203
RESOLUTION NO. -23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND

ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 7-23 directing the preparation and filing of the fiscal year (FY) 2023-24 Annual Report for Assessment District No. 22 (AD 22); and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 32-23 entitled “A Resolution of Intention of the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill to Order Improvements, Levy Assessments, and Provide for Public Hearing and Notice in Assessment District No. 22 for Fiscal Year 2023-24” (the Resolution of Intention); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, the Engineer’s Report on the Levy and Collection of Assessments for FY 2023-24 for AD 22 prepared by Harris & Associates, was filed with the City Clerk and preliminarily approved subject to certain conditions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer's Report contains the proposed amounts of the assessments to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of land in all areas of AD 22 for FY 2023-24; the plans and specifications for the improvements; an estimate of the costs of the improvements; a diagram for the assessment district; and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements; a description of any substantial changes in the improvements; and the other matters required by Section 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the individual assessments for FY 2023-24 are not proposed to be increased beyond the maximum assessment range approved in the engineer’s report for either Zone. For Grayson Woods, the assessment is proposed to be increased by the annual CPI, which is 5.598%.

This increase, from $319.84 to $337.74, is still below the maximum established assessment rate of $359.00 for Grayson Woods. The assessment rate for Gallery Walk is not proposed to be increased over the previous year ($187.50); and
WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention directed that June 5, 2023, at 7:00 p.m. at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill or via teleconference as noted on the posted agenda (available on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Police Department, and on the City’s web page a minimum of 72 hours before the meeting) be the time and place for the City Council to hold a public hearing on the proposed improvements and the proposed assessments for FY 2023-24; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on the proposed improvements and the proposed assessments for FY 2023-24 on June 5, 2023; and

10.2.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) WHEREAS, the City Council considered all oral and written protests at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council may proceed, pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and Highways Code, to adopt a resolution confirming the levy of the assessments on the assessable parcels of property in the Assessment District, and the adoption of such a resolution shall constitute the levy of assessments on all assessable lots and parcels of property within such zones for FY 2023-24; and
WHEREAS, the assessments which are contained in the Engineer’s Report and which will be levied on assessable lots and parcels of land in AD 22 will not exceed the amounts of the assessments which were approved by the property owners by assessment ballots in proceedings for the formation of AD 22.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that:

1. The public interest, convenience and necessity require that the levy be made.

2. The assessable lots and parcels or property benefited by the improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown by the Boundary Map and Assessment Diagram of AD22 (FY 2023-24) filed in the office of the City Clerk, which is made a part hereof by this reference.

3. Any protests to the proposed improvements and the estimated costs and assessments have been accepted, noted and are overruled.

4. The Engineer’s Report is approved and confirmed, including:
(a) a description of the plans and specifications of the improvements, any substantial changes to the improvements, the Engineer’s estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining the improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith; and
(b) the diagram showing AD 22, plans and specifications for the improvements to be maintained and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective lots and parcels of land within the assessment district; and
(c) the assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed maintenance of improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in the assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from the maintenance, and of the expenses incidental thereto.

5. The Engineer’s Report, the Assessment Diagram, and the assessment contained therein for the payment of the costs of the maintenance and servicing of the improvements in AD 22 for FY 2023-24 are confirmed and hereby levied. The adoption and approval of the

10.2.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report as a whole, and of the plans and specifications, estimate of costs and expenses, the diagram and the assessment, as contained in the report, as herein above determined and ordered, is intended to and shall refer and apply to the report, or any portion thereof.

6. Based upon oral and documentary evidence, including the Engineer’s Report, offered and received at the hearing, this City Council expressly finds and determines that: (a) each of the several lots, parcels of land, and property will be specially benefited by the installation and maintenance of the improvements; (b) the amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel will not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcels; and (c) there is substantial evidence to support, and the weight of the evidence preponderates in favor of, the aforesaid finding and determination as to special benefits.

7. Immediately, upon the adoption of this resolution, but in no event later than August 10, 2023, following such adoption, the City Clerk, shall file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment and a certified copy of this resolution with the Auditor of the County of Contra Costa. Upon such filing, the County Auditor shall enter on the County property tax roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount of assessment thereupon as shown in the Engineer’s Report. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes and all laws applying to the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments, after deduction of any costs of collections, shall be paid to the City of Pleasant Hill.

8. Upon receipt of the money representing the collection of the assessments, the City shall deposit said collections in a special fund to be used for the costs within the assessment district for the installing or constructing of improvements, servicing, and maintenance, herein ordered.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 5
th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

10.2.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24)

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22
MAY 2023

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500
Concord, CA 94520
www.weareharris.com

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER….……………………………………………………………..i PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS……………………………………………………………………..1 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COSTS………………………………………………………………………………….3 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM…………………………………………………………………………….6 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT………………………………………………………………...7 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL…………………………………………………………………………..13 APPENDIX B – DISTRICT DIAGRAM………….……………………………………………………………...21

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
i

STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
AGENCY: CITY OF PLEASANT HILL
PROJECT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for Assessment District No. 22 (“District”) of the City of Pleasant Hill, to provide landscaping and lighting services upon each lot or parcel of land in the District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 (“FY 23/24”).

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Pleasant Hill’s Resolution being adopted by the City Council for the:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 22
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART 1
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City and are hereby made a part of this Report by reference.

PART 2
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for FY 23/24.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
ii
PART 3
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District and any Zones. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the office of the City Clerk.

PART 4
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received.

The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established at the time of formation.

Appendices
Appendix A – Assessment Roll
Appendix B – District Diagram
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of , 2023
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
1 PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The boundaries of Assessment District No. 22 correspond to the boundaries of the tracts of land identified on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report. The tracts include the Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk subdivisions within the City of Pleasant Hill.

A copy of the Assessment Diagram is on file with the City Clerk. The Assessment Diagram refers to the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for an exact description of the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District. Each parcel on the Assessment Diagram is keyed to the assessment, which appears in the Assessment Roll, by its Assessor’s Parcel Number.

The Assessment District consists of two subdivisions containing 237 assessable single-family residential lots and an assessable golf course and clubhouse parcel. There are also several non-assessable parcels including open space, scenic easements, public streets and rights of ways. In total there are 248 assessor’s parcels within the District Boundaries.

Improvements and Services Provided
The following are the specific improvements maintained and serviced within the District:

Grayson Woods
The subdivision contains 104 residential lots and a golf course and clubhouse. The improvements consist of the maintenance, servicing of landscaping and street lighting on public streets, easements, and right of ways immediately adjacent to and within the Grayson Woods subdivision. The improvements being maintained consist of public street lighting systems and public landscaping including, but not limited to, trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, turf, and asphalt pathways. The services provided include, but are not limited to, litter and debris removal, irrigation system adjustment, maintenance and repairs, pruning, staking, fertilizing, plant replacement and restoration, weed and rodent control, erosion control, trimming of vegetation, and removal of debris in creek areas.

There are approximately 69,000 square feet of landscaped area within the Grayson Woods development. There is approximately 1,000 square feet of turf area and several hundred square feet of raised annual color beds included in the in the landscaping, which are changed two to three times annually.

The small creek along the west side of Reliez Valley Road empties into a 48 inch pipe with a trash rack on the east side of Reliez Valley Road, which needs to be cleared from landscaping debris as necessary. Vegetation in a creek running through the landscaped easement must be pruned and cleaned, and periodic slope stabilization is provided as necessary to ensure proper drainage. Maintenance of public open space parcels F, H and I is also provided by the District.

In addition to the landscaping improvements, there are 30 total streetlights to be serviced and maintained: six on Reliez Valley Road, five on Grayson Road, eight on Iron Hill Street and eleven on Golf Links Street and adjoining cul-de-sacs.

The County services and maintains the streetlights on Reliez Valley Road, and this cost has been excluded from the District. Plans and specifications for the service and maintenance of streetlights are published by PG&E and are incorporated into this Report by reference.

The District also repairs or resurfaces the asphalt path along Reliez Valley Road. Maintenance of the public open space within the development may also be provided under the District but has been budgeted on an as-needed basis.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
2 There are no substantial changes or additions to the improvements or services proposed for FY 23/24.

Gallery Walk
The subdivision contains 133 residential lots. These parcels of land were annexed into the existing assessment district in 2002 and are shown on the diagramfound in Appendix B. There is also a separate budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements for the Gallery Walk development.

Areas beingmaintained lie within the public right of way, generally located along West Hookston Road, Cleaveland Road, Astrid Drive and within the East Bay Municipal Utility District (“EBMUD”) right of way. The improvements consist of the maintenance and servicing of the existing landscaping, including, but not limited to trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, turf, concrete sidewalks, and asphalt pathways; and street lighting on public streets, easements, and right of ways immediately adjacent to the subdivision. The landscaping services provided include, but are not limited to litter and debris removal; irrigation system adjustment, maintenance and repairs; pruning, staking, fertilizing, plant replacement and restoration; weed control; erosion control; and trimming of vegetation.

The services in the public right of way adjacent to West Hookston Road, Cleaveland Road, and Astrid Drive are limited to street lighting. The maintenance of ground cover, turf, irrigation, and litter and debris removal in these areas is not the responsibility of the District but is provided by the individual property owner or the Homeowner’s Association.

There will be an occasional need to repair or replace the concrete sidewalks along the exterior of the tract. Reserve funds will be used for that purpose when required and may also be used to resurface the asphalt path along the EBMUD trail in the future, as well as other repairs or replacements as needed.

There are no substantial changes or additions to the improvements or services proposed for FY 23/24. The Budget however, includes $1,600 for bench replacements. The benches have been weathered and rusted out by the elements, and are no longer safe.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
3 PART 2 – ESTIMATE OF COST
The estimated budget for the annual maintenance and servicing of the improvements and the proportionate share of administration costs for the District has been prepared based on the estimated and historical costs to provide said maintenance and services. Individual budgets for Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk are shown on the following pages.

The proposed costs represent the estimated costs required to maintain the improvements at the level expected by property owners and the City, and includes contributions from the City to account for the general benefit conferred to parcels outside the District.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
4 GRAYSON WOODS
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 10,372 $ 8,062 $ 5,933
Interest $ 331 $ 340 $ 351
Assessments $ 36,645 $ 37,744 $ 38,876
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 2,437 $ 2,510 $ 2,585 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 39,412 $ 40,594 $ 41,812

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 1,399 $ 1,441 $ 1,485
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 14,913 $ 15,360 $ 15,821 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 6,634 $ 6,700 $ 6,767 C/S Professional (3) $ - $ - $ -
C/S Construction $ - $ - $ -
Sidewalk/Pathways Maintenance $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ 3,837 $ 3,952 $ 4,071
Utilities - Water $ 9,632 $ 9,920 $ 10,218
Utilities - Other $ 1,432 $ 1,475 $ 1,519
Advertising $ 250 $ 250 $ 250
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (4) $ 214 $ 214 $ 214 Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment (5) $ 3,410 $ 3,410 $ 3,410 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 41,721 $ 42,724 $ 43,755

RESERVE BALANCE
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 20,861 $ 21,362 $ 21,877.70 Operating Reserve Fund Adjustments $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 20,861 $ 21,362 $ 21,878 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ (10,489) $ (13,299) $ (15,945) Capital Reserve Fund Adjustments $ (2,309) $ (2,129) $ (1,943) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ (12,798) $ (15,429) $ (17,888) Total Reserve Balance $ 8,062 $ 5,933 $ 3,990
Assessable EDU's - Single Family Parcels 104.00 104.00 104.00 Assessable EDU's - Golf Course Clubhouse & Remainder 4.50 4.50 4.50 Total EDU 108.50 108.50 108.50
Actual/Proposed Assessment (6) $ 337.74 $ 347.87 $ 358.31 Maximum Allowable Assessment (7) $ 359.00 $ 359.00 $ 359.00 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years assumes a 1% escalator. 3 Consulting Services related to professional service and construction contract costs. 4 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 5
$1,000 is being budgeted for a dog waste bag station. 6 Actual Assessment are proposed to increase as shown to replenish Reserves. 7 Maximum Assessment was established in an amount not to exceed $359.00.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
5 GALLERY WALK
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24
Projected
Budget
FY 24/25
Projected
Budget
FY 25/26

DISTRICT REVENUES
Balance Forward $ 49,106 $ 47,125 $ 47,343
$ - $ -
Interest $ 450 $ 450 $ 450
Assessments $ 24,938 $ 24,938 $ 24,938
General Benefit Contribution from General Fund $ 6,056 $ 6,238 $ 6,425 SUBTOTAL REVENUES $ 31,443 $ 31,625 $ 31,812

DISTRICT EXPENDITURES
District General Expenses (1) $ 1,399 $ 1,441 $ 1,485
Maintenance Division Salaries & Benefits (1) $ 15,106 $ 15,559 $ 16,026 District Engineering and Annual Report (2) $ 8,132 $ 8,213 $ 8,296 C/S Professional (3) $ - $ - $ -
C/S Construction (3) $ - $ - $ -
Sidewalk/Pathways Maintenance $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000
Utilities - Gas & Electric $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Water (4) $ - $ - $ -
Utilities - Other $ 198 $ 204 $ 210
Advertising $ 250 $ 250 $ 250
Contra Costa County Collection Fee (5) $ 238 $ 238 $ 238 Supplies - Landscaping Material and Equipment (6) $ 3,100 $ 500 $ 500 SUBTOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 33,424 $ 31,406 $ 32,005

RESERVE BALANCES
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 16,712 $ 15,703 $ 16,002 Operating Reserve Fund Adjustments $ - $ - $ -
Estimated Operating Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 16,712 $ 15,703 $ 16,002 Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Beginning Balance 7/1 $ 32,394 $ 31,422 $ 31,341 Capital Reserve Fund Adjustments $ (1,981) $ 218 $ (193) Estimated Capital Reserve Fund Ending Balance 6/30 $ 30,413 $ 31,640 $ 31,148 Total Reserve Balance: $ 47,125 $ 47,343 $ 47,151
Assessable EDU's - Single Family Parcels 133.00 133.00 133.00 Total EDU 133.00 133.00 133.00
Actual/Proposed Assessment $ 187.50 $ 187.50 $ 187.50
Maximum Allowable Assessment (7) $ 234.36 $ 234.36 $ 234.36 1 City Engineering and Public Works maintenance staff time devoted to the District. 2 Dist Eng & Annual Rpt costs for future years assumes a 1% escalator. 3 Consulting Services related to professional service and construction contract costs. 4 Water supplied by development. 5 County fee to place assessments onto the tax roll. 6
$1,600 is being budgeted for bench replacements as they have reached the end of their useful life. 6 An additional $1,000 is being budgeted for a dog waste bag station. 7 Maximum Assessment was established in an amount not to exceed $234.36.

Future Year Projected Budgets assume a 3% increase to expenditures.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
6 PART 3 – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of each Zone and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District has been submitted to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Pleasant Hill, and is hereby made a part of this Report by reference.

A copy of the Assessment Diagram is included as Appendix B of this Report.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
7 PART 4 – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
General
Street and Highways Code Section 22573 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
— Streets and Highways Code Section 22573
The 1972 Act permits the designation of areas of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will received different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In November 1996, the voters of California adopted Proposition 218, which has been codified as Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. Proposition 218 imposed a number of substantive and procedural requirements on taxes, assessments, and property-related fees imposed by local governments in California.

The method of apportionment described in this Report, and confirmed by the City Council, utilizes commonly accepted engineering practices established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the California Constitution for the allocation of special benefit assessments. The calculation of assessments is based upon the parcel type and the services and improvements provided to equitably apportion the costs based on the special benefit received by each lot or parcel. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is over and above any general benefit conferred upon said lots or parcels or to the public at large.

Special Benefit
The improvements and associated costs have been allocated to the assessable properties within the District based upon the special benefit received by those properties. The improvements for which the properties are assessed have been identified as necessary, were installed and are being maintained as part of the development plans. As such, the improvements and continuing maintenance and servicing of those improvements are the obligation of the properties within the District.

General Benefit
The landscaping and hardscape improvements that are unique to each neighborhood in the District (Grayson Woods and Gallery Walk), with regards to the specific plant materials, style and intensity of landscaping and hardscape within the community, provide a special benefit to property owners within those neighborhoods by providing visual interest, a sense of identity and community and definition that is unique to each neighborhood. Landscaping is also used to provide neighborhood traffic calming and provide informal gathering places.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
8 As a result, the landscaping helps to define the character of each neighborhood, setting it apart from other areas within the City. The landscaping improvements provide particular aesthetics and community identity to the neighborhoods.

Those landscaping improvements were installed and are maintained as a condition of development and would not have been installed otherwise.

Assessments may only be levied upon parcels in proportion to the proportional special benefit received by a parcel per Article XIII D of the State Constitution (“Proposition 218”). Special benefit means a particular and district benefit that is over and above any general benefit conferred on parcels located in the district or to the public at large. Further, no assessment may exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional benefit conferred upon a parcel. Based upon this, it is necessary to calculate the cost related to any general benefit, and that amount must be subtracted from the assessment to be levied upon the parcels in the District. The improvements maintained by the assessment, which are described in the plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer, confer special benefits that affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effects on other parcels not within the District, and which real property in general and the public at large do not share since the improvements were provided for the sole benefit of the parcels within the district and were required as a condition of development.

However, even though the improvements were installed for the sole benefit of the parcels within each area, it has been determined that there is an incidental General Benefit from the maintenance of trees, landscaping improvements, hardscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities located near the parcels within each neighborhood. This benefit is considered incidental and provides a small amount of benefit to motorists traveling to or from the neighborhood, or to properties outside the District. As a result, the City has quantified this General Benefit as described below in order to subtract it from the special benefit and will make an annual contribution for the incidental general benefits conferred to those outside properties or individuals.

For Grayson Woods, the landscaping along the east side of Reliez Valley Road and the north side of Grayson Road may confer some limited benefit to passersby or parcels outside the District.

For purposes of calculating a percentage for general benefit, the square footage of landscaping being maintained was divided by the annual labor costs (Salaries & Benefits on Budget page) to maintain that landscaping, using FY 20/21 dollars. Labor costs in FY 20/21 were $10,543. There is approximately 69,000 SF of landscaping being maintained ($10,543/69,000 = $0.153/SF). For areas in the City with no landscaping improvements to be maintained, the City provides limited weed control and debris removal as necessary. The average cost per square foot for those services is approximately $0.025. The percentage difference between $0.153 and $0.025 is equal to 16.34%. The City therefore, will make a contribution equal to 16.34% of the annual labor costs of the Grayson Woods area to offset any general benefit.

For Gallery Walk, the landscaping along the EBMUD easement, as well as the south side of Hookston Road and the east side of Cleveland Road confers some level of benefit to individuals outside the District.

The costs per square foot to maintain the landscaping improvements within Gallery Walk is also $0.153/SF (Using FY 20/21 Labor Costs of $7,406 / 48,500 SF maintained = $0.153/SF). Due to the nature and location of the landscaping in Gallery Walk, and the fact that approximately 40% of the total area being maintained is located within the EBMUD easement, which is readily accessible to the general public, it has been determined that 80% of the landscaping within the EBMUD easement should be considered general benefit. The remaining 20% of the landscaping provides direct and special benefit to the parcels in Gallery Walk. That 20% includes the landscaping along the west side of the development, as well as the asphalt pathway, which provides direct access to the EBMUD easement. Taking into account the areas defined as general benefit vs. special benefit and spreading the costs proportionally, the City will make a contribution equal to 40.09% of the annual labor costs of the Grayson Woods area to offset any general benefit. See next page for calculation details.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
9 EBMUD Easement:
40% of 48,500 total SF of landscaping = 19,400 SF at $0.153/SF = $2,968.20. 20% of that amount is 3,880 SF. 19,400 SF – 3,880 SF = 15, 520 SF at $0.153/SF = $2,374.56 applied to general benefit. The remaining amount of $659.60 is assessable to the District properties as special benefit.

Remainder of Gallery Walk:
60% of 48,500 total SF of landscaping = 29,100 SF at $0.153 = $4,452.30, reduced by 14.70% = $654.49 additional to general benefit. The remaining amount of $3,797.81 is assessable to the District properties as special benefit.

Total to General Benefit: $3,029.05
Total Salaries & Benefits: $7,406.00 (FY 20/21 dollars) $3,029.05/$7,406.00 = 40.09%
Definition of Special Benefit
The method of apportionment described in this Report is based on the premise that each assessable parcel or unit receives distinct and special benefits from the improvements and services provided, including the visual desirability provided by well-maintained landscaping and lighting. In accordance with Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution:
“Special benefit means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or the public at large” The special benefits associated with local landscaping and lighting improvements are specifically:
 Enhanced desirability of properties due to proximity and accessibility of the improvements.  Improved aesthetic appeal provided by a positive representation of the development, neighborhood and the community.
 Improved ingress and egress to property resulting in enhanced traffic flow, reduced traffic accidents and consequent reduction of possible property damage.
 Improved traffic visibility and circulation.
 Improved accessibility for emergency vehicles.
 Reduced vandalism and other criminal activity.

ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
To impose a new assessment or increased assessment in excess of the Maximum Assessment Rate for the current fiscal year, the City must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4c that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owners must approve the proposed new or increased assessment via a property owner protest balloting process before any such new or increased assessment can be imposed. A protest occurs when, at the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots opposed to the new or increased assessment outweigh the returned ballots in favor of the new or increased assessment, weighting those assessment ballots by the financial obligation of each parcel.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
10 The definition of new or increased assessments includes any assessment which, 1) did not previously exist or, 2) exceeds a previously approved assessment amount or assessment range formula. Any assessment range formula must have been previously adopted by the agency and approved by the property owners.

Assessment Methodology
It is generally recognized that most budgetary items will be impacted by inflation in future years. In accordance with the California Constitution, Section 53739 (b)(1), assessments “may be adjusted for inflation pursuant to a clearly defined formula…” A formula for an inflationary adjustment is therefore included as part of the maximum assessment for this District and was approved by the property owner(s) at the time of formation. The formula, as described below, allows for annual adjustments to the budget and the assessments.

The benefit formula used to determine the financial obligation for each parcel is based on the improvements benefitting the parcels, as well as the use, or type, of each parcel that benefits from said improvements. One of the more common approaches to fairly distributing District costs to the benefitting parcels in maintenance districts such as this utilizes a methodology referred to as the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (“EDU”) method of apportionment. This method utilizes various property characteristics such as development status, type of development (land-use) and size (units or acreage) to compare the proportional benefit of each property compared to other properties benefitting from the improvements. The parcel types and corresponding benefit within the District follow:

Grayson Woods
Residential parcels
The maintenance of landscaping along Reliez Valley Road and Grayson Road is of special benefit to all residential properties within the Grayson Woods development in that it enhances the appearance of the development and improves the quality of life within the development on a day to day basis. The cleaning and removal of debris from drainage ditches assures that drainage from upstream properties may pass freely through the development. All properties must access the property via Reliez Valley Road or Grayson Road and the benefit to each single-family residential parcel is presumed to be the same, regardless of location within the development. As a result, each singlefamily residential parcel is assigned an EDU of 1.00.

Golf Course Clubhouse/Restaurant and Parking
The benefit received by the golf course clubhouse/restaurant and parking area from street lighting may be evaluated in terms of the benefit received by a single-family residence. The clubhouse benefits the same from vehicle and pedestrian safety as well as from enhanced property appearance and security. The clubhouse parking lot frontage is roughly equivalent to that for four average residential lots and its street lighting benefit is accordingly assigned 4.00 EDU.

Remainder of Golf Course
The remainder of the golf course parcel receives limited special benefit from street lighting. That portion of the fairway which fronts on a lighted street benefits from the safety and security provided to pedestrians and motorists.

Assuming a typical lot has a frontage of 50 feet, an equivalent number of units of street lighting benefit for the golf course fairway may be calculated by dividing that portion of the parcel by 50, resulting in an additional 0.50 EDU.

Open Space and Scenic Easements
These parcels do not have lighted frontage, do not benefit from street lighting, and therefore are not assessed

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
11 As described above, equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) have been assigned to each assessor’s parcel number (APN) by land use. They are listed in following table:

Grayson Woods
EDUs by Land Use
Parcel Type
Parcel
Count
EDU per Parcel
Type Total EDU’s
Single Family Residential 104 1.00 104.00
Golf Course & Clubhouse 2 4.50 4.50
Open Space (Lots F, H & I) 4 0.00 0.00
Totals: 110 108.50
At the time of formation, the assessment levied per EDU was established to fall within a range of $289.00 to $359.00, with the exact amount to be levied in any given year to be determined by the budget for that year. The actual assessment each year may be increased the following year by the percentage of the annual change in the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco/Oakland/Hayward Area (CPI), so long as the resulting increase does not exceed $359.00, as established. If the assessment in any year is proposed to exceed $359.00, the City must comply with Article XIII D, Section 4c of the California Constitution, as previously stated. The annual percentage change for 2022 (January 2023), was 5.598%. The assessments for FY 23/24 are proposed to increase to $337.74 ($319.84 X

1.055982642 = $337.74) as shown on the budget page.

Gallery Walk
The Gallery Walk area consists of single-family residential parcels only.

The net total amount to be assessed has been distributed among the various parcels of land within the Gallery Walk Annexation in accordance with the estimated special benefits to be received by each parcel from the improvements.

Each residential lot is assigned an equal dwelling unit, “EDU.” The assessment per EDU is calculated as the total estimated cost less the general benefit contribution by the City is shown in the Cost Estimate table, divided by the total EDUs in Gallery Walk.

Gallery Walk
EDUs by Land Use
Parcel Type Parcel Count
EDU per Parcel
Type Total EDUs
Single Family Residential 133 1.00 133.00
Totals: 133 133.00
At the time of annexation, the assessment levied per EDU was established to fall within a range of $187.49 to $234.36, with the exact amount to be levied in any given year to be determined by the budget for that year. The actual assessment each year may be increased the following year by the percentage of the annual change in the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco/Oakland/Hayward Area (CPI), so long as the resulting increase does not exceed $234.36, as established.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
12 If the assessment in any year is proposed to exceed $234.36, the City must comply with Article XIII D, Section 4c of the California Constitution, as previously stated. The annual percentage change for 2022 (January 2023), was 5.598%. The assessments for FY 23/24 are not proposed to increase from the previous year.

Operating Reserve
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set-up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Assessment funds shall be used only for the purposes stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments or to fund costs which are greater than revenue from the assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. The estimated beginning and ending Operating Reserve fund balances for FY 22/23 are shown in the Cost Estimate table.

Section 22569 (a) of the 1972 Act allows the District assessments to “…include a reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the city expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the county, whichever is later.” Capital Reserve
In addition to the 50% Operating Reserve detailed above, an agency may create an additional reserve (“Capital” or “Replacement” Reserve) to fund the replacement of improvement items that useful life exceeding five years. These items may include but are not limited to the asphalt path in each subdivision, sidewalks, streetlights, irrigation systems, etc. The estimated beginning and ending Capital Reserve fund balances for FY 23/24 are shown in the Cost Estimate table.

Any additionalsurplus funds, in excess of the 50% Operating Reserve or identified Capital Reserve, must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
13 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel Identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be based on available parcel maps and other property data from the Contra Costa County Assessor’s office as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and adopted by the City Council.

A listing of parcels assessed within the District for FY 23/24, along with the corresponding assessment amounts, is included on the following pages. If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel(s) shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report.

Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amounts applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

Non-assessable lots or parcels include areas of public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas and rights-of-way, including public greenbelts and parkways; utility rights-of-way; common areas; landlocked parcels; small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots and any other property that cannot be developed or has specific development restrictions. These types of parcels receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore, exempted from assessment.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
14 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
164-040-037 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-040-039 Grayson Woods $1,439.28
164-550-001 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-002 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-003 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-004 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-005 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-006 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-007 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-008 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-009 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-010 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-011 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-012 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-013 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-014 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-015 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-016 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-017 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-018 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-019 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-020 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-021 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-022 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-023 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-024 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-025 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-026 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-027 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-028 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-029 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-030 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-031 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-032 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-033 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-034 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-035 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-036 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-037 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-038 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-039 Grayson Woods $337.74

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
15 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
164-550-040 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-041 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-043 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-044 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-045 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-046 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-047 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-048 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-049 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-050 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-051 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-052 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-053 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-054 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-055 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-056 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-057 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-058 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-059 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-550-063 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-550-064 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-550-066 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-001 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-002 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-003 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-004 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-005 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-006 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-007 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-008 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-009 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-010 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-014 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-015 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-016 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-017 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-018 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-019 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-020 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-021 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-022 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-023 Grayson Woods $337.74

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
16 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
164-560-024 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-025 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-026 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-027 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-028 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-029 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-030 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-031 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-032 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-033 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-034 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-035 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-036 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-037 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-038 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-039 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-040 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-041 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-042 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-046 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-560-047 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-560-048 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-560-049 Grayson Woods $0.00
164-560-051 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-052 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-053 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-055 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-056 Grayson Woods $337.74
164-560-057 Grayson Woods $337.74
$36,644.80

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
17 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
149-121-043 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-044 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-045 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-046 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-047 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-048 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-049 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-050 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-051 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-052 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-053 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-054 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-055 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-056 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-057 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-058 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-059 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-060 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-061 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-062 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-063 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-064 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-065 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-066 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-067 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-068 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-069 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-070 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-071 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-072 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-073 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-074 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-075 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-076 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-077 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-078 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-079 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-080 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-081 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-082 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-083 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-084 Gallery Walk $187.50

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
18 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
149-121-085 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-086 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-087 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-088 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-089 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-090 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-091 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-092 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-093 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-094 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-095 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-096 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-097 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-098 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-099 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-100 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-101 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-102 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-103 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-104 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-105 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-106 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-107 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-108 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-109 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-110 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-111 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-112 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-113 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-114 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-115 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-116 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-117 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-118 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-119 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-120 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-121 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-122 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-123 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-124 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-125 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-126 Gallery Walk $187.50

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
19 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
149-121-127 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-128 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-129 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-130 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-131 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-132 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-133 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-134 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-135 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-136 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-137 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-138 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-139 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-140 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-141 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-142 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-143 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-144 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-145 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-146 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-147 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-148 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-149 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-150 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-151 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-152 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-153 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-154 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-155 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-156 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-157 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-158 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-159 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-160 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-161 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-162 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-163 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-164 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-165 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-166 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-167 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-168 Gallery Walk $187.50

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
20 APN Zone
Proposed
FY 23/24
Levy
149-121-169 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-170 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-171 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-172 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-173 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-174 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-175 Gallery Walk $187.50
149-121-176 Gallery Walk $0.00
149-121-177 Gallery Walk $0.00
149-121-178 Gallery Walk $0.00 $24,937.50

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
21 APPENDIX B – DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages show the Assessment Diagram or boundary map for each Zone. The lines and dimensions shown on maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the current year, are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report.

10.2.b
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
22 10.2.b
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24) Engineer’s Report
Assessment District No. 22
City of Pleasant Hill
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
23 10.2.b
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - AD 22 Engineer's Report (Public Hearing for AD 22 Assessments FY 2023-24)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION ___-23 ACCEPTING THE DIABLO VIEW ROAD

AND PLEASANT HILL ROAD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 22-05 AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO ISSUE AND RECORD A NOTICE OF COMPLETION

SYNOPSIS
The Diablo View Road & Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Improvements Project No. 22-05 (Project) provided storm drain improvements at the intersection of Diablo View Road and Pleasant Hill Road, as well as along Diablo View Road to the Barnett Circle intersection. The contractor, Norgo Engineering, has completed all work to the City’s satisfaction. The purpose of this item is for City Council to consider the acceptance of the Project as complete and to authorize the issuance of a Notice of Completion.

DISCUSSION
Background
The Storm Drain Improvement Program identified in the 2022 – 2027 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) funds the installation of new storm drain facilities or needed upgrades to existing facilities.

Projects funded through this program are implemented per the City’s Storm Drain Improvement Priority List, and address locations of poor drainage or areas with localized flooding. The Diablo View Road & Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Improvements Project No. 22-05 is identified on the CIP as Project CP-22-1.

On November 7, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-22, which awarded a construction contract for the project to the low bidder, Norge Engineering, for $392,322.50 (including contingency).

Analysis
Diablo View Storm Drain. The Project is now complete and the work conforms to the construction plans and specifications. Construction began on January 12, 2023. The Contractor substantially completed the project on March 31, 2023, which was within the allotted contract time.

10.3 Packet Pg. 234
Project highlights included installation of new:
 810 linear feet of 18-inch HDPE storm drain pipe along Diablo View Road and Pleasant Hill Road
 3 each Type I manhole and base
 1 each Type II manhole and base
 1 each Type G drain inlet and base
 2 each Type J drain inlet and base
 1,375 square feet of additional asphalt concrete
 Restoration of existing roadside swale
 Restoration of traffic striping and traffic signs
The total cost of construction, including one change order, is $368,727.83, which is $23,594.67 below the approved contract amount of $392,322.50. Change order work totaled $27,577.83 and included items that were outside the original scope of work, as follows:
 Existing utility conflicts and minor design changes;
 Unknown existing abandoned corrugated piping within the project limit;  Additional hand digging, potholing, and saw-cutting due to unmarked and unknown existing utilities;
 Additional 530 square feet of asphalt paving;
 Additional manhole restoration.

EBMUD Utility Paving. Prior to the start of the City’s Project, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) performed a water main relocation at the Barnett Circle and Diablo View Road intersection. The City’s contractor, on behalf of the utility, performed the final asphalt paving restoration for EBMUD’s work area upon completion of the City’s Project. EBMUD subsequently reimbursed the City $3,600 for the additional asphalt paving, which was then applied to the Project’s account balance.

Retention. The City is retaining up to five percent of the total construction cost ($18,436.39) from Norgo Engineering to ensure that the Contractor pays all of its vendors and suppliers. The procedure for releasing the retention requires the City Council’s formal acceptance of the work with authorization to issue and record a Notice of Completion. If there are no claims filed within 35 days of recording the notice, the City may release final payment of the retained amount to the contractor. The completed work is subject to a one-year maintenance period to address any problems that occur within that time.

Emergency Repair. Due to heavy rain and flooding during the months of January through March 2023, a large sinkhole developed on the asphalt pavement on Chadima Lane, resulting in a nonfunctioning storm drain inlet. After investigation, City staff discovered a large void underneath the failing asphalt pavement spanning across the entire length of the 30-foot-wide street measuring approximately 5 feet in breadth and 3 feet in depth.

Due to the unsafe nature of the undermined roadway, the sinkhole prompted the City to immediately request that Norgo Engineering, whose team was mobilized and had just completed

10.3 Packet Pg. 235
the storm drain repairs on Diablo View Road the week prior, perform emergency repairs during the week of April 3, 2023. The City has available funding for emergency repairs, as well as preplanned projects, within the Storm Drain Improvement Program (MK-2) of the approved 2022- 27 Capital Improvement Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT
The contractor completed the Project within approved budgeted amount at a total cost of $368,727.83. The overall Project, which was paid for through the allocation of American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) funds, cost less than the original budget of $620,000, a result partly attributable to the City’s outreach during the advertising for public bidding. The remaining savings of $251,272.17 will return to the City’s ARPA fund balance for future allocation.

Norgo Engineering performed the emergency sinkhole repair work on Chadima Lane on a time and materials basis at a total cost of $38,451.46. There is sufficient Measure K fund balance within the Storm Drain Improvements Program (MK-2) of the approved 2022-27 Capital Improvement Plan to pay for this unanticipated emergency work.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt a resolution accepting the Diablo View Road & Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Improvements, Project No. 22-05, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to issue and record a notice of completion.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
None recommended.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Prepared by: Omar Adina, Assistant Engineer
Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

10.3 Packet Pg. 236
RESOLUTION NO. -23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

ACCEPTING THE DIABLO VIEW ROAD AND PLEASANT HILL ROAD STORM DRAIN IMPROVMENTS PROJECT NO. 22-05 AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO ISSUE AND RECORD A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
WHEREAS, the Diablo View Road & Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Improvements Project No. 22-05 is identified as a budgeted and approved project in the FY 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), Project No. 22-05 (Project CP-22-1); and
WHEREAS, the Diablo View Road & Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Improvements Project No. 22-05 addressed locations of poor drainage and areas with localized flooding problems; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2022, the City Council awarded a contract to Norgo Engineering to perform work described in the contract documents entitled Diablo View Road & Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Improvements Project No. 22-05; and WHEREAS, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) performed a water main relocation at the Barnett Circle and Diablo View Road intersection. The City’s contractor, Norgo Engineering, on behalf of EBMUD, performed the final asphalt paving restoration for EBMUD’s work area upon completion of the City’s Project.

WHEREAS, EBMUD has reimbursed the City $3,600 for the additional asphalt paving work performed by Norgo Engineering, a sum which has since been applied to the Project’s account balance; and
WHEREAS, the work has been performed to the satisfaction of the City, and Norgo Engineering is requesting final payment for the completed work; and WHEREAS, the City has retained five percent (5%) of the total construction cost ($18,436.39) from Norgo Engineering. If there are no claims filed within 35 days of recording the notice, the City may release final payment of the retained amount to the contractor; and WHEREAS, on a matter of public safety unrelated to the Project, due to the heavy rain fall and flooding during the months of January through March 2023, a sinkhole developed below Chadima Lane, which compromised the integrity of the roadway and threatened public safety; and WHEREAS, Norgo Engineering performed unforeseen emergency repairs for the City at Chadima Lane on a time and material basis during the week of April 3, 2023, in the amount of $38,451.46, which will be funded by the Storm Drain Improvements Program (MK-2); and WHEREAS, the California Public Contract Code requires the City to notify the public of acceptance of a project prior to making a final payment.

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Accepting the Diablo View Road and Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Imp. Project as Complete) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that:

1. The work performed as the Diablo View Road & Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Improvements Project No. 22-05, is complete to the satisfaction of the City.

2. If there are no claims filed within 35 days of recording the notice, the City may release final payment of the retained amount of $18,436.39 to Norgo Engineering.

3. The City Engineer is authorized to execute a Notice of Completion and record it with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within ten (10) days from the date thereof.

4. The City will provide Norgo Engineering a payment of $38,451.46 from the Storm Drain Improvements Program (MK-2) funds for the satisfactory completion of unforeseen emergency road repair work at Chadima Lane.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 5
th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Accepting the Diablo View Road and Pleasant Hill Road Storm Drain Imp. Project as Complete)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. __-23 ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO SANDSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR PHASE I OF THE DOWNTOWN STREET
TREE REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 03-23 AND THE GRAYSON

CREEK RESTORATION AND MITIGATION PROJECT

SYNOPSIS
The Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23, Phase I, will provide for needed streetscape improvements along Crescent Drive. In addition, the bidding included creek restoration and mitigation along Grayson Creek that was originally part of the Library project.

The purpose of this item is to consider acceptance of the lowest responsive, responsible bid from Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc., and seek authorization to award the construction contract.

DISCUSSION
Background
Tree Project. The Pleasant Hill Downtown Project was completed in 1999 and included the installation of Bradford Pear street trees along Crescent Drive, Crescent Plaza and the adjacent downtown corridor. Over nearly 25 years of growth, the Bradford Pear’s root systems have presented ongoing maintenance issues, which require expensive asphalt pavement and sidewalk repairs. In addition, the height of the trees is such that pruning them has required a balance between the health of the trees and the needs of Downtown businesses for clearance and visibility. The typical lifespan for the Bradford Pear tree is 20-25 years, so these trees have reached the end of their normal life.

In the past several years, three Bradford Pear trees have fallen along Crescent Drive and Crescent Plaza due to a rotted tree base. In August 2022, the City hired Tony Wayne Walcott Consulting, a licensed arborist to perform a tree assessment of the existing trees adjacent to Crescent Drive and Crescent Plaza, which concluded that the Bradford Pear trees are problematic due to disease, poor structure, and splitting co-dominant stems. Due to their weak branch structure, the tree limbs will continue to split and break apart during high wind events and storms, causing future potential danger and damages. Further, the lack of soil volume weakens the trees, many are at

10.4 Packet Pg. 239
risk, and several are dying. The combination of inadequate space, insufficient and inconsistent irrigation/rainfall, and poor soil conditions have resulted in the demise of the Bradford Pear specimen in this location.

City staff, working closely with Vestar Downtown Property Managers (Vestar) and the Batha Design Group, a landscape architect, conducted a study of the Downtown street trees and compiled the Crescent Drive Street Tree Inventory and Sustainability Guide, which provides guidelines and recommendations for the removal of the existing Bradford Pear Trees, as well as recommendations for the type, installation and the long term care of the replacement trees. The Batha Design Group presented a variety of replacement tree options, including the Chinese Pistache. City staff and Vestar reviewed each specimen and determined that the Chinese Pistache “Keith Davey” species would best meet the needs of the City and the Downtown businesses. The species is the flowerless male clone of the Chinese Pistache tree, is drought tolerant, and is a more suitable specimen for outdoor public areas given its medium size, attractive form, brilliant fall colors, and non-flowering attributes.

The Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23, Phase I, is identified as a funded project in the approved FY 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) (Project IP-3). Due to budget constraints and in an effort to minimize the impact on Downtown businesses, the project has been divided into three phases. Phase I is multi-faceted, and will achieve the following:
 Replace 35 existing Bradford Pear trees with new Chinese Pistache “Keith Davey” species;
 Widen the existing tree wells;
 Expand existing soil with new structural soil;
 Repair the existing irrigation system at each tree to its functional form; and  Repair existing damaged sidewalk along the corridor adjacent to the project.

New pavers will be installed adjacent to all new replacement trees to ensure a clean look that compliments the existing newly remodeled aspects of downtown. The cost of these improvements is $366,240.50, including a 15 percent contingency. Phase I encompasses improvements along Crescent Drive between Contra Costa Boulevard and Crescent Plaza; phases two and three will cover the rest of Crescent Drive followed by improvements to Crescent Plaza.

The project is located within Assessment District 20 (AD 20), Zone 6; for FY 21/22 and FY 22/23, $108,000 was budgeted from Zone 6 to help fund the project. A budget review of Zone 6 has determined that these funds are not available to fund the project and alternative sources have been identified. Given the benefit that the Downtown businesses will receive with the addition of the new improvements, UBS agreed to contribute $100,000 to the cost of the project, but additional non-assessment district funds will be needed to complete it (see below) Grayson Creek Restoration and Mitigation. An additional CIP project encompasses creek restoration and mitigation along Grayson Creek that was originally part of the Library completion requirement. In an effort to attract more bids and receive competitive pricing, this work was included in the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project. Staff had previously presented to City

10.4 Packet Pg. 240
Council an estimated cost of $100,000 in Measure K funding for the creek work, required as part of the Library project. The actual bid for this work is $40,900. Adding a 15 percent contingency brings the cost to $47,035, which represents a cost savings of $52,965 in Measure K funds.

Analysis
Project Cost. The Project’s total construction cost (Downtown Tree Project and Creek Restoration) is not to exceed $413,275.50, which includes $359,370.00 base bid for both projects, plus a staff-recommended contingency of 15 percent, or $53,905.50, to address any unforeseen conditions during construction. The total construction cost of the tree project is $366,240.50. This is $58,240.50 above the approved budgeted amount of $308,000, as identified in FY2022-27 CIP. The combination of elevated construction cost and the AD20 budget shortfall requires an additional allocation of $166,240.50 from alternative sources to balance the Project budget.

Budget Committee. On April 25, 2023, the Budget Committee met to discuss the status and funding of Phase I of the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project. Staff confirmed that previously identified ARPA and private funds (UBS) were available; however, due to insufficient funds in AD20, Zone 6, the Committee requested staff consider various options for funding, such as loaning AD20 funds from American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) or using unallocated CIP project/program funds.

Loaning funds to AD20 would require the District’s ability to repay the loan in a reasonable amount of time. Staff is currently projecting that AD20 is going into deficit, and is moving forward with a Proposition 218 process to maintain funding for operational costs. Therefore, the loan option would not be viable since AD20 could not afford any additional costs, such as a repaying a loan for the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project.

Since the Budget Committee’s meeting in late April, Staff has identified the Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure Program as a viable, alternative funding source to cover the Project’s budget shortfall of $166,240.50. Also, the Creek Restoration and Mitigation Project is under staff’s estimate, so the remaining $52,965 of the funds would remain in the Measure K fund.

Bids Received. The Notice Inviting Bids was sent to the construction exchanges on March 9, 2023, and the Project was advertised in the East Bay Times newspaper on March 10, 2023. Four bids were received and publicly read on Tuesday, April 18, 2023, at 3:00 p.m. at the Engineering Division Counter at City Hall.

Per project bid documents, the City will base the project award on the lowest responsive, responsible bid. The following table summarizes the bid amounts. The low bid is marked in bold.

Company Total Base Bid

1. Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc. $359,370.00

2. Marina Landscape, Inc. $489,000.00

3. Brightview Landscape Development, Inc. $513,338.00

10.4 Packet Pg. 241

4. McGuire and Hester $686,156.00
Average of Four Bids Received $511,966.00
Engineer’s Estimate (EE) $275,000.00
A detailed analysis of Sandstone’s bid price of $359,370 (which includes the creek restoration work) revealed that the bid is 30 percent lower than the average base bid of $511,966, and its bid price is reasonable relative to the other competitive construction bids received. Sandstone has reviewed the full bid results and confirmed its unit prices; therefore, the bid is acceptable.

Sandstone has recently completed similar projects including landscaping and storm drain improvements for the West Contra Costa Unified School District. Additionally, Sandstone has completed retaining wall and sediment removal projects for the City of Berkeley. Staff believes the Contractor’s team has the experience and professional competency to deliver a satisfactory product for the City. The Contractor is ready to begin construction this summer and complete the Project by fall 2023. Staff concludes that the bid is acceptable after checking Sandstone’s references.

Sandstone’s bid proposal documentation is complete, and staff has determined them to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Bidding rules require that the City Council award the construction contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder or reject all bids. Staff recommends the City Council award the construction contract to Sandstone.

FISCAL IMPACT
Staff proposes funding Phase I of the Downtown Street Tree Project through a combination of three sources: American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA), Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure Program, and private funding (UBS). The additional bid item for creek restoration will be funded through Measure K bond proceeds. Project funding is summarized in the table below:

Project Expense
Construction Contract $359,370.00
Contingency (15%) $ 53,905.50
Total $413,275.50
Funding Sources
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) $100,000.00
Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure $166,240.50
Private Funding (UBS) $100,000.00
Measure K (Bond Proceeds) $ 47,035.00
Total $413,275.50
Staff is not requesting the allocation of General Fund money for the construction of the Project.

Engineering Division staff has confirmed with the Finance Department that the monies identified

10.4 Packet Pg. 242
above are available for construction of this Project.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt a resolution to accept the bid and award a construction contract for the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23, and authorize the City Manager to execute a construction contract with Sandstone Environmental Engineering, Inc.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council may consider allocating more ARPA funds, or a combination of both ARPA and Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure Program sources, to cover the outstanding balance.

Council may reject all current bids and rebid the project, which would likely result in higher bids and project delays.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Contractor Agreement
Exhibit 2 – Project Location Map
Prepared by: Omar Adina, Assistant Engineer
Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

10.4 Packet Pg. 243
RESOLUTION NO. -23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PHASE I OF THE DOWNTOWN STREET TREE REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 03-23 AND THE GRAYSON CREEK RESTORATION AND MITIGATION PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH SANDSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.

WHEREAS, the City has adopted the FY 2022–2027 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which includes the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23 (Project IP-3 in the CIP) as a funded project; and
WHEREAS, Phase I of the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23 will address replacement of 35 existing at-risk and dying Bradford Pear trees, and other necessary improvements; and
WHEREAS, Phase I of the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23 will address the removal of concrete sidewalk tripping hazards adjacent to the tree locations identified for replacement; and
WHEREAS, Phase I of the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23 will provide for needed streetscape improvements along Crescent Drive. In addition, in an effort to attract more bids and receive competitive pricing, the bid included creek restoration and landscaping mitigation work along Grayson Creek that was originally part of the Library Project.

WHEREAS, the Project’s total construction cost is not to exceed $413,275.50, which includes $359,370.00 base bid, plus a contingency of 15 percent, or $53,905.50, to address any unforeseen conditions during construction; and
WHEREAS, the total construction cost of the Downtown tree work, including contingency of 15 percent, is $366,240.50, which is $58,240.50 above the approved budgeted amount of $308,000, as identified in FY2022-2027 CIP; and
WHEREAS, Assessment District 20 (AD20), Zone 6 has insufficient funds to pay for its costsharing allocation of $108,000, as identified in the FY 2022-2027 CIP, and requires allocation of funds from other sources to cover this shortfall; and
WHEREAS, the combination of elevated construction cost and the AD20, Zone 6 budget shortfall requires an additional allocation of $166,240.50 from alternative sources to balance the Project budget; and
WHEREAS, the estimated cost for the creek work, required as part of the Library Project, was $100,000 in Measure K funding. The actual bid for this work, including contingency of 15 percent, is $47,035, which represents a cost savings of $52,965 in Measure K funds; and

10.4.a
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Downtown Street Project Phase I) WHEREAS, the City will be utilizing $47,035.00 of the remaining bond proceeds for the City Library Project (Project MK-4 in the CIP) funded by Measure K to pay for “Base Bid Item #12 – City Library Landscaping and Irrigation;” and
WHEREAS, the City will be utilizing $166,240.50 from the FY22/23 and FY23/24 Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure Program, as identified in the FY2022-2027 CIP, to cover the remaining Project budget shortfall; and
WHEREAS, the City will be utilizing $100,000 from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) funding for project construction; and
WHEREAS, the City will be reimbursed $100,000 from downtown property owner, UBS, for project construction; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator has determined that the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23 is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption (operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public facilities involving negligible or no expansion of use occurring within the City public right-of-way) in compliance with the Complete Streets Act of 2008; and WHEREAS, on April 13, 2023, the Notice of Exemption was filed with the County Clerk of Contra Costa County; and
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2023, at 3:00 p.m., Engineering staff publicly opened and examined the sealed bids for the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that Sandstone Environmental Engineering is the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill as follows:

1. Sandstone Environmental Engineering’s base bid of $359,370 is found to be the lowest responsive, responsible bid and is accepted and awarded by the City Council at the unit prices set forth in the bid. This bid is on file in the Community Development Department and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full.

2. A total project construction budget of $413,275.50, which includes the base bid price of $359,370 and project contingency funds in the amount of $53,905.50 (15%), is authorized by the City Council at the unit prices set forth in Sandstone Environmental Engineering’s bid.

3. The City Council approves the allocation of $166,240.50 ($125,000 from the FY22/23 and $41,240.50 from FY23/24) from the Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure Program to the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23.

10.4.a
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Downtown Street Project Phase I)

4. The City Council approves the allocation of $47,035 for the “Library Landscaping and Irrigation” creek work, which was part of the Library Project funded by Measure K.

5. The City Manager is authorized to execute a construction contract with Sandstone Environmental Engineering for Phase I of the Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of June 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
TIMOTHY M. FLAHERTY, Mayor
ATTEST:

JUANITA DAVALOS, Acting City Clerk

10.4.a
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Downtown Street Project Phase I)

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Contractor Agreement (Downtown Street Project Phase I)

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Contractor Agreement (Downtown Street Project Phase I)

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Contractor Agreement (Downtown Street Project Phase I)

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Contractor Agreement (Downtown Street Project Phase I) Exhibit 2

PROJECT LOCATION MAP
Downtown Street Tree Replacement Project No. 03-23

10.4.c
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Project Location Map (Downtown Street Project Phase I)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 05, 2023
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER DRAFT MAPS AND COMPOSITION

OF DISTRICTS FOR BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS

PURPOSE
The purpose of this item is to hold the seventh public hearing overall, and the fourth “post-map” public hearing to review draft maps and the composition of districts and to receive input from the community concerning transitioning to by-district elections.

Background:

On March 6, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-23 declaring its intention to transition to district-based elections. This action was taken in response to the January 19, 2023 letter received from Kevin Shenkman of the Law Offices of Shenkman and Hughes on behalf of the Pleasant Hill Community Alliance, that claimed the City’s at-large system of voting dilutes the ability of Latino and Asian voters to elect candidates of their choice or to otherwise influence the outcome of the City’s elections. This letter is the first step before a potential lawsuit can be filed claiming the City has violated the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA). On March 20, 2023, the City Council held the first of four required public hearings and on April 3, 2023, the Council held the second required public hearing. On April 17, 2023, the Council conducted an additional “pre-map” hearing to gather additional public input.

A minimum of two “post-map” hearings are required be held, to review the draft maps and identify the sequencing of district based elections. This means the Council will select a final map, and determine which districts will be on the ballot at its next regular election in November, 2024 and which districts will defer to the general election in November, 2026. All proposed maps must be provided at least seven days prior to each of these “post-map” public hearings. The two “post-map” public hearings must be held within 45 days of each other. The first “post-map” hearing was held on May 1, 2023, with a second post-map hearing held on May 6, 2023 and a third post-map hearing on May 22, 2023. The hearing of June 5, 2023 is the fourth post-map hearing.

All required public hearings have been held.

10.5 Packet Pg. 252
Analysis:

If the City follows the “safe harbor” process set forth in Assembly Bill 350, a lawsuit can be avoided and the plaintiffs’ fees and costs will be capped at approximately $34,000. Pursuant to Elections Code § 10010, the City must hold at least four public hearings in connection with the establishment of electoral districts. The City is required to hold at least two public hearings over a period of no more than 30 days before any map or maps of the boundaries for the proposed voting districts are drawn. These first two “pre-map” hearings are for the purpose of developing the criteria that will be used for drawing the maps. At these”pre-map” public hearings, the community is invited to provide input regarding the composition of the districts. On March 20 and April 3, the Council held the first and second required “pre-map” hearings. At the second hearing, the Council directed that a further “pre-map” public hearing be held. Although not legally required, the Council desired to solicit additional public input and comment prior to the map drawing process. The additional hearing was held on April 17, 2023.

As part of this “pre-map” process, the Council provided direction as to specific factors, such as pertinent communities of interest or geographic landmarks it wanted the demographers to focus consideration on in the preparation of draft maps. The demographers also have evaluated any maps submitted by the public for compliance with the CVRA and Federal Voting Rights Act (FVRA) and those maps have been and are being presented for Council’s consideration at the “post-map” hearings.

To increase public awareness of the transition to district elections, the City has been and will continue to use a variety of public communication channels to engage members of the community, including having sent a postcard to every residence in the City prior to publication of the initial draft districting maps. Information also will be distributed by publishing newspaper notices five days before each hearing; social media posts; emails sent to a distribution list of members of the public who have submitted written comment, City commissioners, and subscribers to the City’s Outlook newsletter and the City’s bi-weekly Update newsletter.

Districting information will continue to be featured on the City’s website at the following web address: www.pleasanthillca.org/districts, which is populated with information in nine languages (including English) about how the public can participate in the process and answers to frequently asked questions about the districting process. The City has enabled closed captioning translations into all of the languages supported by Zoom. The City also has enabled an automated translation button on the City’s webpage.

Subsequent to the pre-map hearings, the City’s demographer prepared two draft maps, one depicting a five district configuration and one depicting a four district configuration, with a directly-elected at-large Mayor. In addition, two maps were received from members of the public. The proposed maps were posted to the City’s website on Monday, April 24, 2023, in accordance with the Elections Code. These first four maps were reviewed and discussed by the Council at the May 1, 2023 regular City Council meeting.

Three additional maps were received from the public on Wednesday, April 26, 2023 and were analyzed by the City’s demographer. These maps were posted to the City’s website on Friday,

10.5 Packet Pg. 253
April 28, 2023, in compliance with the seven day posting requirement pursuant to the Elections Code, and were discussed at the May 6, 2023 public hearing.

Subsequent to the May 6th hearing, a total of seven additional maps were received from the public, three maps with a five district configuration, one map with a three district configuration, and three maps with a four district plus directly elected mayor configuration.

These maps were analyzed by the City’s demographer, with two maps found to be non-viable as they did not meet the district boundary requirements under the Elections Code: one map was drawn with a total of three Council districts instead of four or five, and one four-district map contained a large, non-contiguous portion in the northeast district. Additionally, one map split five different census blocks. These three maps were not presented for consideration. The four maps found to be in compliance with the requirements of the Elections Code and that did not split census blocks were posted to the City’s website on Monday, May 15, 2023 for discussion at the May 22, 2023 hearing. Map #8 in the five district map category was posted to the website, but subsequently found to have been posted with a linkage error. This error was corrected by staff on Tuesday morning. All eleven maps now have been posted for at least the required seven days.

A summary of the maps is included below. Each of the draft maps was analyzed and reviewed by the city’s demographer, and found to be legally viable. This means the maps create potential Council districts that are population-balanced within a margin +/- 10%, are contiguous and compact.

One consideration of district-based elections is the potential to create majority/minority voting districts, where a single identified minority represents 50%+1 of Citizens of Voting Age (CVAP). Pleasant Hill has a relatively low minority total population (40.2%), and the CVAP population is 30.9%, with 69.1% of the CVAP population comprised of Non-Latino Whites. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, given the dispersed nature of minority residency, to create one or more voting districts that represent 50%+1 minority citizens of voting age from a single minority. None of the proposed maps achieves this goal, however the highest total minority CVAP population (all minorities - known as a “coalition minority” district), is identified for each proposed map.

A summary of the population deviation and minority coalitions for all eleven maps is presented below.

10.5 Packet Pg. 254
The Minority CVAP Coalition for all districts on all eleven Maps is provided as Exhibit A.

Map 5:

At the May 22nd Council meeting, the Council formed a subcommittee of Council members Shess and Noack to work with the City Attorney’s office to make minor modifications to Map 5.

Unfortunately, the demographer found that moving entire census blocks resulted in unacceptable deviations above 10% and the only way to accomplish the requested modifications to Map 5 was to split census blocks, which, while not illegal, is discouraged and is not viewed as a best practice. The subcommittee will report further on this issue and provide their recommendation at the June 5th Council meeting.

Mayor’s Question Regarding an Election:

At the May 22, 2023 Council meeting, the Mayor asked if two or more Maps could be selected by the Council and placed on a ballot at a Special Election for the voters of Pleasant Hill to decide which Map should be selected. While we are not aware of this method of selection being used in another city, we see no impediment to the Council calling a Special Election and placing two or more Maps on the ballot as separate measures in order to allow the voters to select the Map that will govern how the City will be divided into districts. The districting ordinance that will be adopted by the Council would need to specify that the Map receiving the most votes and at least 50% of the votes, will be the selected Map.

While the Council could call a Special Election as a stand-alone election just for Pleasant Hill, according to Contra Costa County, the cost of such an election would be between $9 - $14 per voter. Since Pleasant Hill has 23,111 registered voters, the resulting cost would be $207,999 to $323,554. If, however, the Council were to consolidate a Special Election with the State-wide Primary Election in March of 2024, the cost would be $2 - $4 per voter for a resulting total of $46,222 to $92,444.

Map ID Population Deviation Minority CVAP Coalition
Draft Map 1, 4 Districts 7.25% D3 – 42.3%
Draft Map 2, 4 Districts 6.64% D1 – 41.4%
Draft Map 3, 4 Districts 8.38% D2 – 36.7%
Draft Map 1, 5 Districts 6.48% D3 – 45.7%
Draft Map 2, 5 Districts 7.43% D1 – 42.3%
Draft Map 3, 5 Districts 9.25% D1 – 42.2%
Draft Map 4, 5 Districts 7.60% D4 – 43.9%
Draft Map 5, 5 Districts 7.94% D1 – 42.1%
Draft Map 6, 5 Districts .78% D4 – 40.4%
Draft Map 7, 5 Districts 5.71% D4 – 44.9%
Draft Map 8, 5 Districts 1.92% D1 – 45.0%

10.5 Packet Pg. 255
Public Input:

The next public hearing to receive and consider input from the public concerning the composition of voting districts will be set by the Council at the June 5, 2023 hearing. The public is also encouraged to provide input via email to [email protected]. Input may also be dropped off at the City Clerk’s Department or mailed to the City Clerk at the following address:

City of Pleasant Hill
Attn: City Clerk
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Please note that the deadline for submittal of public created maps was May 9, 2023 at 5:00p.m.

FISCAL IMPACT
The services of an expert demographer are needed to prepare and review publically submitted maps at a cost of approximately $15,500. There will be additional costs incurred by the work of the City Attorney’s Office during the process. Finally, under the law’s “safe harbor” provision, the City will be responsible for the potential plaintiffs’ attorney fees and costs for a maximum amount of approximately $34,000 paid to Mr. Shenkman. As well, the City has executed a contract for translation and interpretation services for a not to exceed amount of $20,000.

Informational mailer costs are estimated at $12,000 and costs for “promoted” social media engagement is estimated at $500.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA (Section 21605) and CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c)(3) and 15378. Conducting public hearings for public input regarding transitioning to by-district elections and setting a schedule for future hearings meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page. A Public Hearing Notice was published in the East Bay Times on March 15, 2023, March 29, 2023, April 12, 2023, April 26, 2023, May17, 2023 and May 31, 2023. A news release was posted on social media, and in the City’s bi-weekly Update newsletter.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION

10.5 Packet Pg. 256
Conduct the fourth “post-map” public hearing, receive and consider input from the public, and provide further direction to staff regarding the composition of districts.

ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit A - Minority CVAP Coalition - all Districts - all Maps Public Hearing Notice
Correspondence
Draft Maps
Prepared by: Janet Coleson, City Attorney
Approved by: June Catalano, City Manager

10.5 Packet Pg. 257
Map # District Total CVAP
Populaton
%NL White %Non-White Map # District Total CVAP
Populaton
%NL White %Non-White
Four Districts Five Districts
1 D1 6,698 71.02% 28.98% 1 D1 5,422 69.69% 30.31%
D2 7,322 76.05% 23.95% D2 5,066 68.75% 31.25%
D3 5,770 57.76% 42.24% D3 4,256 54.39% 45.61%
D4 5,679 69.46% 30.54% D4 5,518 78.45% 21.55%
D5 5,207 71.01% 28.99%
2 D1 5,483 58.58% 41.42%
D2 6,602 70.77% 29.23% 2 D1 4,260 57.86% 42.14%
D3 6,160 69.58% 30.42% D2 5,604 72.09% 27.91%
D4 7,224 75.22% 24.78% D3 5,251 64.04% 35.95%
D4 4,874 70.86% 29.14%
3 D1 6,640 68.84% 31.16% D5 5,480 78.13% 21.87%
D2 6,283 63.31% 36.69%
D3 6,409 77.05% 22.95% 3 D1 4,260 57.86% 42.14%
D4 6,137 67.08% 32.92% D2 5,692 71.08% 28.20%
D3 5,251 64.04% 27.91%
D4 4,786 71.18% 28.82%
D5 5,480 78.13% 21.87%
4 D1 4,937 75.16% 24.84%
D2 5,595 68.99% 31.01%
D3 4,871 64.75% 35.25%
D4 4,342 56.10% 43.90%
D5 5,724 77.62% 22.38%
5 D1 4,194 57.89% 42.11%
D2 5,433 72.55% 27.45%
D3 5,238 64.20% 35.98%
D4 4,938 72.45% 27.55%
D5 5,666 75.76% 24.24%
6 D1 4,479 59.63% 40.37%
D2 5,725 74.02% 25.98%
D3 4,916 73.06% 26.94%
D4 4,946 64.11% 35.89%
D5 5,403 72.77% 27.23%
7 D1 4,886 72.90% 27.10%
D2 5,545 70.33% 29.67%
D3 5,342 65.95% 34.05%
D4 4,197 55.09% 44.91%
D5 5,499 78.32% 21.68%
8 D1 4,409 55.00% 45.00%
D2 5,466 70.58% 29.42%
D3 5,027 63.89% 36.11%
D4 4,958 76.68% 23.32%
D5 5,609 76.79% 23.21%

10.5.a
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Exhibit A - Minority CVAP Coalition – All Districts – All Maps (CVRA District Hearing 7)

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE

PLEASANT HILL CITY COUNCIL
(Transition to District-Based Elections for City Council Members) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on June 5, 2023, the Pleasant Hill City Council will conduct a public hearing to receive comment from the public regarding the draft maps for district-based elections for Members of the City Council, pursuant to the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA).

In accordance with California Elections Code section 10010(a)(1), the City Council conducted public hearings regarding the establishment of district boundaries for district-based elections on March 20, 2023, April 3, 2023, April 17, 2023, May 1, 2023,May 6, 2023 and May 22, 2023.

The City’s demographer prepared electoral division maps consistent with federal and state law outlining the proposed boundaries of the electoral divisions, and the draft maps are available on the City website at www.pleasanthillca.org/districts. The public is invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps. Those desiring to be heard on the item will be given an opportunity to do so during the public hearing on June 5, 2023 (7:00 p.m.).

The City Council will then take steps at future public meetings in June and July, 2023 to adopt an Ordinance transitioning the City from an at-large to district-based method of electing members of the City Council.

This public hearing will be conducted in the City Council Chamber, located at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, California, 94523. The agenda will be posted in advance of the meeting in compliance with the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act and can be viewed at www.pleasanthillca.org/agendas.

Interested parties may subscribe to receive agenda notices at www.pleasanthillca.org/NotifyMe.

This notice is available in English, Farsi, Russian, Simplified and Traditional Chinese, Tagalog, Ukrainian, and Vietnamese on the City’s website at www.pleasanthillca.org/districts. If you are aware of a community member needing this notice to be translated to another language or, if in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, you need special assistance to participate in a City Council meeting, contact the City Clerk’s Office at (925) 671-5267 at least 72 hours before the meeting. For more information on the City providing accessible communication to the public, please visit the City’s website at: https://www.pleasanthillca.org/812/ADA-Accessibility. _______________________________
Juanita Davalos, Acting City Clerk
Publish Date: May 31, 2023

10.5.b
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Notice of Public Hearings (CVRA District Hearing 7) Correspondence

10.5.c
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Correspondence (CVRA District Hearing 7) 1 Juanita Davalos
From: Juanita Davalos
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 8:57 AM
To: Councilmember Allen Vinson; Councilmember Sue Noack; Councilmember Zac Shess; Mayor Tim Flaherty; Vice Mayor Matt Rinn
Cc: June Catalano; Geoff Gillette; Janet Coleson
Subject: FW: In favor of map #5 - Tim Matthiessen
From: Tim Matthiessen <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2023 8:13 AM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: In favor of map #5
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.

I live at 2266 Lisa Ln and am in favor of map #5. It seems appropriate to group minority communities together to allow for better representation on the city council.

Thank you for considering my input.
-Tim Matthiessen

10.5.c
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Correspondence (CVRA District Hearing 7) City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 1, Five Districts

Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 Districts 3, 4 & 5
2026 Districts 1 & 2
Total Deviation

6.48%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.d
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Map 1 - Five Districts and Demographic Area (CVRA District Hearing 7) Draft Map 1, Five Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 6,881 -49 -0.70% 4,420 802 139 15 1,045 11 45 404 2 7,190 260 3.75% 1,060 4,270 216 17 1,050 29 59 489 3 6,741 -189 -2.72% 2,955 1,138 309 26 1,712 45 62 494 4 6,850 -80 -1.15% 4,808 848 62 10 620 10 39 453 5 6,987 57 0.83% 1,120 4,274 159 22 815 7 39 551 Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391 Ideal 6,930 Deviation 6.48% Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 5,680 574 3,778 123 14 895 10 36 250 D2 5,868 775 3,601 200 13 885 23 51 320 D3 5,580 861 2,585 253 20 1,435 40 53 333 D4 5,286 578 3,862 52 10 522 9 22 231 D5 5,500 773 3,523 129 18 693 4 26 334 Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468 Citizen Voting Age Population CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 5,422 3,779 116 697 4,709 - 541 16 59 D2 5,066 3,483 262 661 4,395 - 351 - 83 D3 4,256 2,315 75 814 3,441 - 756 55 28 D4 5,518 4,329 61 530 4,979 - 474 21 32 D5 5,207 3,698 113 714 4,498 - 427 - 18 Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220 *NL = Non Latino *AIAN = American Indian Alaska Native
*VAP = Voting Age Population
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.d
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Map 1 - Five Districts and Demographic Area (CVRA District Hearing 7) City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 1 Four Districts + Directly Elected Mayor

Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 Districts 2, & 3
2026 Districts 1 & 4
Total Deviation

7.25%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.e
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Map 1 Four Districts and Directly Elected Mayor and demographic data (CVRA District Draft Map 1, Four Districts + Directly Elected Mayor – Demographic Data District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 8,740 78 0.90% 1,038 5,688 164 22 1,185 10 62 571 2 9,000 338 3.90% 1,179 6,152 101 19 836 16 52 645 3 8,537 -125 -1.45% 4,005 1,431 366 28 2,001 49 69 588 4 8,372 -290 -3.35% 4,882 1,320 254 21 1,220 27 61 587 Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391 Ideal 8,662 Deviation 7.25% Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 7,116 742 4,791 141 21 1,025 9 44 343 D2 6,961 826 4,936 86 19 693 11 35 355 D3 7,093 1,061 3,515 306 20 1,689 44 59 399 D4 6,744 932 4,107 224 15 1,023 22 50 371 Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468 Citizen Voting Age Population CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 6,698 4,757 65 841 5,855 - 592 16 64 D2 7,322 5,569 103 803 6,513 - 608 21 28 D3 5,770 3,333 202 1,000 4,763 - 954 55 41 D4 5,679 3,945 257 772 4,891 - 395 - 87 Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220 *NL -= Non Latino *AIAN = Amerian Indian Alaskan Native
*VAP = Voting Age Population
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.e
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Map 1 Four Districts and Directly Elected Mayor and demographic data (CVRA District City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 2, Four Districts, submitted by a member of the public Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 2 Districts TBD
2026 2 Districts TBD
Total Deviation

6.64%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.f
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Map 2 - Four Districts - (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA Draft Map 2, Four Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 8,338 -324 -3.74% 1,450 3,840 369 28 1,929 49 70 603
2 8,495 -167 -1.93% 948 5,670 151 17 1,130 10 62 507
3 8,913 251 2.89% 1,397 5,194 228 25 1,320 18 59 672
4 8,903 241 2.78% 1,173 6,023 137 20 863 25 53 609
Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391
Ideal 8,662 Deviation 6.64%
Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 6,881 1,060 3,357 308 20 1,629 43 61 403
D2 6,928 697 4,757 131 16 974 9 38 306
D3 7,045 984 4,276 191 22 1,098 13 51 410
D4 7,060 820 4,959 127 17 729 21 38 349
Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468
Citizen Voting Age Population
CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 5,483 3,212 162 947 4,523 - 869 55 41
D2 6,602 4,672 108 808 5,782 - 632 16 58
D3 6,160 4,286 89 848 5,319 - 586 - 63
D4 7,224 5,434 268 813 6,398 - 462 21 58
Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220
NL = Non-Latino
AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
VAP = Voting Age Population
CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.f
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Map 2 - Four Districts - (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 2, Five Districts, submitted by a member of the public

Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 3 Districts TBD
2026 2 Districts TBD
Total Deviation

7.43%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.g
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Map 2 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA Draft Map 2, Five Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 6,649 -281 -4.05% 3,148 1,040 195 13 1,647 40 61 505 2 7,164 234 3.38% 802 4,856 128 17 881 8 53 419 3 7,121 191 2.76% 1,267 3,702 369 24 1,234 20 50 455 4 6,810 -120 -1.73% 4,247 1,030 73 17 886 10 33 514 5 6,905 -25 -0.36% 4,774 829 120 19 594 24 47 498 Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391 Ideal 6,930 Deviation 7.43% Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 5,397 748 2,683 152 10 1,386 34 51 333 D2 5,855 590 4,080 111 16 765 7 34 252 D3 5,954 946 3,238 319 16 1,044 20 45 326 D4 5,268 695 3,446 62 17 741 5 24 278 D5 5,440 582 3,902 113 16 494 20 34 279 Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468 Citizen Voting Age Population CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 4,260 2,465 96 721 3,524 - 771 26 11 D2 5,604 4,040 54 675 4,924 - 485 16 58 D3 5,251 3,363 235 822 4,428 - 497 29 69 D4 4,874 3,454 103 616 4,261 - 504 - 26 D5 5,480 4,282 139 582 4,885 - 292 21 56 Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220 *NL = Non Latino *AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
*VAP = Voting Age Population
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.g
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Map 2 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 3, Four Districts, submitted by a member of the public Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 2 Districts TBD
2026 2 Districts TBD
Total Deviation

8.38%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.h
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Map 3 - Four Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA Draft Map 3, Four Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 8,612 -50 -0.58% 964 5,529 165 15 1,343 26 62 508
2 8,531 -131 -1.52% 1,508 4,447 413 27 1,466 30 62 578
3 8,390 -272 -3.14% 1,072 5,702 106 17 856 19 44 574
4 9,116 454 5.24% 1,424 5,049 201 31 1,577 27 76 731
Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391
Ideal 8,662 Deviation 8.38%
Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 7,035 707 4,640 139 14 1,150 25 43 317
D2 7,077 1,119 3,858 361 17 1,227 26 53 416
D3 6,577 733 4,661 95 16 715 17 35 305
D4 7,225 1,002 4,190 162 28 1,338 18 57 430
Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468
Citizen Voting Age Population
CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 6,640 4,571 125 877 5,736 - 659 16 60
D2 6,283 3,978 323 999 5,276 - 576 29 76
D3 6,409 4,938 145 664 5,726 - 478 21 59
D4 6,137 4,117 34 876 5,284 - 836 26 25
Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220
*NL = Non-Latino
*AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
*VAP = Voting Age Population
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.h
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Map 3 - Four Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 3, Five Districts, submitted by a member of the public

Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 3 Districts TBD
2026 2 Districts TBD
Total Deviation

9.25%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.i
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Map 3 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA Draft Map 3, Five Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 6,649 -281 -4.05% 3,148 1,040 195 13 1,647 40 61 505 2 7,290 360 5.20% 815 4,917 129 17 914 8 57 433 3 7,121 191 2.76% 1,267 3,702 369 24 1,234 20 50 455 4 6,684 -246 -3.55% 4,186 1,017 72 17 853 10 29 500 5 6,905 -25 -0.36% 4,774 829 120 19 594 24 47 498 Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391 Ideal 6,930 Deviation 9.25% Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 5,397 748 2,683 152 10 1,386 34 51 333 D2 5,955 602 4,132 112 16 791 7 34 261 D3 5,954 946 3,238 319 16 1,044 20 45 326 D4 5,168 683 3,394 61 17 715 5 24 269 D5 5,440 582 3,902 113 16 494 20 34 279 Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468 CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 4,260 2,465 96 721 3,524 - 771 26 11 D2 5,692 4,087 54 690 4,998 - 500 16 58 D3 5,251 3,363 235 822 4,428 - 497 29 69 D4 4,786 3,407 103 601 4,187 - 489 - 26 D5 5,480 4,282 139 582 4,885 - 292 21 56 Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220 *NL = Non Latino *AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
*VAP = Voting Age Population
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.i
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Map 3 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 4, Five Districts, submitted by a member of the public

Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 3 Districts TBD
2026 2 Districts TBD
Total Deviation

7.6%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.j
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Map 4 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA Draft Map 4, Five Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 6,919 -11 -0.16% 4,520 1,020 59 20 730 9 39 522 2 7,091 161 2.33% 774 4,647 137 15 1,068 9 42 399 3 6,591 -339 -4.89% 3,577 1,113 262 13 1,083 19 58 466 4 6,930 0 0.00% 1,158 3,071 330 26 1,718 47 68 512 5 7,118 188 2.72% 903 4,912 97 16 643 18 37 492 Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391 Ideal 6,930 Deviation 7.60% Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 5,275 688 3,605 50 20 618 5 23 266 D2 5,863 572 3,950 119 14 912 9 29 258 D3 5,392 806 3,048 228 7 902 15 49 337 D4 5,783 874 2,722 273 19 1,455 41 59 340 D5 5,601 621 4,024 87 15 543 16 28 267 Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468 Citizen Voting Age Population CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 4,937 3,711 32 528 4,405 - 453 - 28 D2 5,595 3,860 100 746 4,831 - 563 16 59 D3 4,871 3,154 273 730 4,142 - 414 - 59 D4 4,342 2,436 87 810 3,539 - 750 55 22 D5 5,724 4,443 135 602 5,105 - 369 21 52 Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220 NL = Non Latino AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
VAP = Voting Age Population
CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.j
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Map 4 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 5, Five Districts, submitted by a member of the public

Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 3 Districts TBD
2026 2 Districts TBD
Total Deviation

7.94%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.k
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Map 5 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA Draft Map 5, Five Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 6,585 -345 -4.98% 3,168 966 195 13 1,634 41 68 500 2 6,820 -110 -1.58% 4,562 779 136 14 877 6 50 396 3 7,105 175 2.53% 1,260 3,699 369 24 1,234 20 46 453 4 7,135 205 2.96% 1,067 4,498 65 20 875 12 37 561 5 7,004 74 1.07% 896 4,800 120 19 622 23 43 481 Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391 Ideal 6,930 Deviation 7.94% Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 5,375 707 2,706 152 9 1,387 35 54 325 D2 5,623 567 3,879 116 14 755 5 34 253 D3 5,944 941 3,238 319 16 1,044 20 41 325 D4 5,460 717 3,616 57 20 719 7 25 299 D5 5,512 629 3,910 113 16 525 19 34 266 Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468 Citizen Voting Age Population CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 4,194 2,428 96 723 3,459 - 749 42 4 D2 5,433 3,942 60 626 4,803 - 472 21 58 D3 5,238 3,363 235 816 4,421 - 497 29 69 D4 4,938 3,578 29 576 4,353 - 505 - 33 D5 5,666 4,293 207 675 4,986 - 326 - 56 Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220 NL = Non Latino *AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
*VAP = Voting Age Population
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.k
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Map 5 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 6, Five Districts, submitted by a member of the public

Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 3 Districts TBD
2026 2 Districts TBD
Total Deviation

0.78%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.l
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Map 6 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA Draft Map 6, Five Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 6,915 -15 -0.21% 3,418 1,004 204 12 1,660 41 65 511 2 6,967 37 0.54% 775 4,713 135 15 852 12 48 417 3 6,927 -3 -0.04% 4,510 974 72 18 793 6 41 513 4 6,913 -17 -0.24% 3,583 1,240 331 24 1,200 21 44 470 5 6,927 -3 -0.04% 4,503 975 143 21 737 22 46 480 Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391 Ideal 6,930 Deviation 0.78% Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 5,645 727 2,916 159 9 1,417 35 51 331 D2 5,729 578 3,981 120 14 726 11 40 259 D3 5,315 655 3,617 59 18 664 5 21 276 D4 5,695 922 3,093 283 16 998 17 41 325 D5 5,530 679 3,742 136 18 625 18 35 277 Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468 Citizen Voting Age Population CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 4,479 2,671 96 737 3,736 - 781 42 6 D2 5,725 4,238 69 591 5,131 - 491 21 70 D3 4,916 3,592 43 552 4,355 - 493 - 31 D4 4,946 3,171 205 810 4,132 - 472 29 61 D5 5,403 3,932 214 726 4,668 - 312 - 52 Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220 NL = Non Latino AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
VAP = Voting Age Population
CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.l
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Map 6 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 7, Five Districts, submitted by a member of the public Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 3 Districts TBD
2026 2 Districts TBD
Total Deviation

5.71%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.m
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Map 7 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA Draft Map 7, Five Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 7,098 168 2.43% 1,035 4,516 73 20 867 11 40 536
2 6,948 18 0.26% 766 4,602 134 15 983 7 45 396
3 7,116 186 2.69% 1,168 3,891 368 20 1,136 18 55 460
4 6,720 -210 -3.03% 1,157 3,004 220 19 1,682 48 67 523
5 6,767 -163 -2.35% 842 4,714 90 16 574 18 37 476
Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391
Ideal 6,930 Deviation 5.71%
Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 5,434 697 3,625 61 20 710 7 26 288
D2 5,749 567 3,918 117 14 842 6 34 251
D3 5,930 864 3,382 321 12 956 15 46 334
D4 5,470 854 2,561 175 14 1,431 42 54 339
D5 5,331 579 3,863 83 15 491 16 28 256
Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468
Citizen Voting Age Population
CVAP*19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 4,886 3,562 59 547 4,335 - 509 - 30
D2 5,545 3,900 93 691 4,858 - 553 - 58
D3 5,342 3,523 303 789 4,549 - 434 6 64
D4 4,197 2,312 57 817 3,369 - 731 65 16
D5 5,499 4,307 115 572 4,911 - 322 21 52
Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220
*NL = Non-Latino
*AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
*VAP = Voting Age Population
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.m
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Map 7 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA City of Pleasant Hill – Transition to District Elections Draft Map 8, Five Districts, submitted by a member of the public Draft Proposed
Election Sequence:
2024 3 Districts TBD
2026 2 Districts TBD
Total Deviation

1.92%
(under the acceptable
norm of <10%)

10.5.n
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Map 8 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA Draft Map 8, Five Districts – Demographic Data
District
Total
Population
Raw
Population
%
Population Latino
NL*
White
Alone
NL Black
Alone
NL
AIAN*
Alone
NL Asian
Alone
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
NL Other
Alone
NL 2+
Races
1 6,998 68 0.98% 1,311 3,005 261 23 1,714 48 80 556
2 6,865 -65 -0.94% 752 4,497 133 15 1,029 10 44 385
3 6,874 -56 -0.81% 1,083 3,746 318 15 1,146 18 44 504
4 6,951 21 0.31% 957 4,640 64 17 755 7 30 481
5 6,961 31 0.45% 865 4,839 109 20 598 19 46 465
Total 34,649 4,968 20,727 885 90 5,242 102 244 2,391
Ideal 6,930 Deviation 1.92%
Voting Age Population Total VAP*
Latino
VAP
NL White
Alone VAP
NL Black
Alone
VAP

NL AIAN
Alone
VAP
NL Asian
Alone
VAP
NL
Hawaiian
Alone
VAP
NL Other
Race
Alone
VAP
NL 2+
Races
VAP
D1 5,725 968 2,611 206 15 1,447 42 68 368
D2 5,666 547 3,829 114 14 880 9 35 238
D3 5,688 805 3,221 282 12 966 14 35 353
D4 5,354 646 3,733 51 17 639 4 13 251
D5 5,481 595 3,955 104 17 498 17 37 258
Total 27,914 3,561 17,349 757 75 4,430 86 188 1,468
CVAP19*
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19

NL AIAN
CVAP19

NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
D1 4,409 2,425 71 909 3,522 - 728 49 28
D2 5,466 3,858 106 660 4,783 - 542 16 59
D3 5,027 3,212 217 714 4,295 - 510 6 57
D4 4,958 3,802 51 475 4,474 - 473 21 21
D5 5,609 4,307 182 658 4,948 - 296 - 55
Total 25,469 17,604 627 3,416 22,022 - 2,549 92 220
*NL = Non-Latino
*AIAN = American Indian Alaskan Native
*VAP = Voting Age Population
*CVAP = Citizen Voting Age Population

10.5.n
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Map 8 - Five Districts (submitted by a member of the public) and demographic data (CVRA

← All documents from this meeting