Agenda packet — Pleasant Hill City Council, February 26, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

Pond: The lake system was originally constructed in 1989 during construction of City Hall and was filled with water in 1991. Although not originally designed for wildlife, it is now home to turtles and koi fish. An onsite well supplies mineral-rich "hard water" for the lake. The existing "small pond" is connected to the larger lake via pipes beneath the concrete walkway on the east end of the complex. The system is interconnected - the same well water circulates among the lake, fountain, and HVAC heat pump that serves the community rooms and Council Chamber. The existing lake is concrete lined and shallow. It suffers from poor water quality, a proliferation of algae, and sediment.

10.3 Packet Pg. 293
The lake system has experienced significant changes over the past thirty years through routine maintenance overseen by City staff and an outsourced capital improvement project, completed in 2011.

Fountain: The City Hall Fountain was built in 1991 as part of the City Hall construction project. The colors used in the tile fountain were selected to reflect a prior Sister City relationship with the city of Chilpancingo, Mexico that no longer exists. The hard and abrasive well water that flows through the fountain has removed most of the grout and protective coating of the ceramic tiles. City staff performs routine maintenance and cleaning of the fountain and associated small ponds, though the discoloration of tile surfaces from mineral deposits is difficult to remove.

Plaza: The original concrete walkway consists of exposed aggregate concrete and patterned strips of decorative, engraved tiles, black and brown tiles, and smaller blue tiles. There are approximately 664 personalized, engraved tiles. Over time, the elastomeric seal along the tile edges has failed, allowing water to settle beneath the tiles and causing them to crack. A capital improvement project replaced 65 broken, engraved tiles in 2003. Other routine maintenance includes tile patching and sealing.

Donor Memorial: There are approximately 664 donor tiles in place throughout the complex along the walkways and fountain courtyard area, all of which will be removed as part of this project. The engraved tiles were made possible by the Pleasant Hill Foundation, a volunteer group of Pleasant Hill citizens. Tiles were designed to allow individuals, community groups, and businesses an opportunity to be a part of the new City Hall complex. Proceeds from tile sales and donations funded the purchase and inscription of the tiles. The excess money raised from the sales was spent on design and construction of the Rose Trellis.

Conceptual Project Designs and Cost Estimates. On October 2, 2023, per Resolution No. 70-23, City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a design professional services agreement with Robert Nebolon Architects (consultant) for conceptual architectural design services. The first phase of the project is now complete, and the consultant has provided schematic design drawings and renderings of the renovated pond, fountain, plaza paving, a new land bridge, and a donor memorial that enhance the existing architectural style of Pleasant Hill City Hall. The conceptual design plans and preliminary construction cost estimates are as follows:

Design Option 1 ($1,174,700): Includes fountain and plaza tile replacement, minor fountain plumbing upgrades and replacement. The koi fish, turtles, and marine life will remain in current locations, the presence of which continues to present ongoing challenges relative to degradation of plumbing systems and general maintenance.

Design Option 2 ($2,454,210): Includes the design features and improvements from Option 1 above, though Option 2 separates the koi fish, turtle, and marine life into a split system where the existing pond will become an urban ornamental “lake” and the marine life will be transferred to the new “koi pond.” The separation of these elements will improve water quality, extend the life of plumbing infrastructure, and address some of existing maintenance challenges.

10.3 Packet Pg. 294
Conceptual Design Elements.

Pond: The consultant has developed options, such as preserving the existing interconnected pond system; creating an urban ornamental “lake” that provides for aesthetic enjoyment; and replacing the existing “small pond” with a koi/turtle pond (referred to as “koi pond”). Each option is affected by the existence and quantity of koi and turtles. The consultant has evaluated the existing piping/pumping system and has determined that it would be beneficial to separate the features that utilize well water (lake, koi/turtle pond, fountain, and heat pump) from each other via physical barriers and new piping systems, which are proposed in Option 2. Alternatively, Option 1, which includes replacement of fountain and plaza tiles, as well as minor plumbing upgrades, does not address the impacts associated with the existing koi and turtles and leaves them in their current location.

Fountain: For Option 1, the consultant will develop selections, including rehabilitating the fountain to compliment City Hall and the Community Rooms; removing/replacing fountain tiles with a new, high quality material that are resistant to abrasion; and replacing the aging fountain lighting with new fountain lighting. In addition to the improvements identified as part of Option 1, Option 2 further includes installing new underground fountain plumbing and chlorinating the fountain water supply. These additional steps will provide a more attractive appearance, require less maintenance, eliminate algae growth, and extend the life of the fountain facility.

Plaza Paving: Conceptual designs include removing and replacing the strips of tile with an alternative tile that compliments the surrounding buildings and water feature. New tile material will be skid resistant and ADA compliant. The exposed aggregate concrete will remain in place and will be cleaned (pressure washed). This plaza tile work is included in both Option 1 and Option 2.

Donor Memorial: The consultant has created a conceptual design that honors the donors who contributed to the construction of Pleasant Hill City Hall. The memorial will be protected from the elements and visible to the public. The new donor memorial is a feature of both Option 1 and Option 2.

Landscaping Elements: The consultant has created a conceptual design as part of Option 2 including landscape elements that are not part of Option 1. These elements include a new 520 square-foot land bridge with associated concrete pathway that connect the north end of the koi pond to a new small sitting area; four pre-cast concrete boat fountain water features; six sitting benches at the north and east ends of the koi pond; and 1200 square feet of new additional blue plaza tile at concrete flatwork repairs.

Analysis
The initial project scope of work included complete evaluation of the piping/pumping system, conceptual design, and construction plans and specifications. Staff issued the first Request for Proposals (RFP) on December 21, 2022, to 22 qualified engineering, architectural, and landscape architectural firms, and also posted the RFP in online plan rooms. Two consultants submitted project proposals for the City’s consideration by the February 28, 2023 deadline. Staff interviewed

10.3 Packet Pg. 295
both consultants; however, staff concluded that the approved budget would not adequately support such a large project. Therefore, all proposals were rejected.

Staff reviewed the original project descriptions included in the approved CIP (which were essentially rehabilitation and minor improvements) and re-evaluated the project in light of lessons learned during the first RFP process. The greatest takeaways were the effects of wildlife, associated promotion of sediment build up, and degradation of water quality, as well as the mineral composition of well water that has compromised the pumping/piping system. Upon conclusion of the re-evaluation, Staff concluded a better course of action was to engage a consultant to help develop options and goals that will ultimately increase the service life of these facilities, correct system deficiencies, and reduce maintenance costs in the long run.

The revised project scope of work included only conceptual design. Staff issued a second RFP on August 4, 2023, to qualified architectural and landscape architectural firms. Staff reviewed each proposal submitted, determined Robert Nebolon Architects (consultant) was the most qualified firm, and executed an agreement per Resolution No. 70-23.

The consultant has provided staff with two design options, including preliminary cost estimates. In addition to the two design options, staff asked the consultant to provide an additional “a-la-carte” line item menu, outlining specific additional design options that may interest the City Council.

The consultant and staff provided an update on the various options described here to the Budget Committee on January 23, 2024. The preliminary cost estimates are based on the conceptual plans; more refined cost estimates will be available once final technical plans and specifications are completed. The Budget Committee received the information and directed staff to present the proposed design concepts to the City Council for further input and direction.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City Council approved a project budget of $870,000 identifying American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) funds in the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan to pay for the project. The total current allocated budget for the project, including conceptual design, is $870,000. The total expenditures to date are $55,000, including the consultant’s not-to-exceed contract of $40,000 (including contingency) and City staff costs of $15,000. The total remaining budget amount is $815,000.

The originally approved budget is not sufficient to cover the proposed costs for either option presented by the consultant. The current budget has sufficient funds for design, but additional funding will be necessary for construction. The following are potential funding sources for design and construction:

Option 1 Funding Sources
$1,174,700 1 City Hall Fountain and Pond Project (ARPA) $815,000 2 ADA Improvements IP-2 (Gas Tax Fund 12) $225,000
3 Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure M-4 (Measure J/K) $174,000

10.3 Packet Pg. 296
TOTAL $1,214,000
Option 2 Funding Sources
$2,454,210 1 City Hall Fountain and Pond Project (ARPA) $815,000 2 ADA Improvements IP-2 (Gas Tax Fund 12) $225,000
3 Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure M-4 (Measure J/K) $174,000 4 Storm Drain Improvements MK-2 (Measure K) from FY 22-23 $620,000 5 Additional Funds Needed $620,210
TOTAL $2,454,210

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department.

The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends City Council provide direction to City staff for the City Hall Pond, Fountain, Plaza Paving and Donor Memorial Rehabilitation Project.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
None recommended.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Exhibit 1 – Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2
Exhibit 2 – Conceptual Design Cost Estimates
Prepared by: Omar Adina, Assistant Engineer
Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager

10.3 Packet Pg. 297
PLEASANT HILL CIVIC CENTER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARCHITECTURE 801 CAMELIA STREET, SUITE E BERKELEY, CA 94710 RNarchitect.com 510.525.2725

FOUNTAIN AND PLAZA REPAIRS

CITY PLEASANT HILL CIVIC CENTER
100 GREGORY LANE

PLEASANT HILL, CA
APN: 150-181-050 Date: Scale: Drawn by: Job: Sheet: of: JAN 23, 2023 AS-NOTED RNA STAFF PHCC Revisions: Date: Preliminary Set Design Review Set Plan Check Set Permit Set Construction Set X © ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON X A00110.3.a Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

ARCHITECTURE
801 CAMELIA STREET, SUITE E
BERKELEY, CA 94710
RNarchitect.com
510.525.2725 FOUNTAIN AND PLAZA REPAIRS CITY PLEASANT HILL CIVIC CENTER 100 GREGORY LANE PLEASANT HILL, CA APN: 150-181-050 Date:

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set X © ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON X A100
OCEANSIDE CIVIC CENTER, CALIFORNIA 1991
LOVEJOY FOUNTAIN, PORTLAND OREGON 1964 PIAZZA d'ITALIA, NEW ORLEANS, LA 1978 HERMAN PARK, TX 1978 RIVER SIDE PARK, DAYTON OHIO BEVERLY HILLS CIVIC CENTER. 1988

USE OF COLORFUL TILE IN THE FOUNTAIN INLAID TILE TO SYMBOLIZE FLOWING WATER TILE & CASCADING POOLS & TOPOGRAPHIC SHAPES TO EMULATE LAND-FORMS

SUBMERGED BOAT FORMS AND SHAPES MORE BOAT SHAPES BOAT SHAPES IN THE RED OVAL

USE OF LAND-FORMS USE OF LAND-FORMS--DETAIL USE OF LAND-FORMS AND TILE COLORFUL TILE BOAT SHAPES LAND-FORMS

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set X © ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON X

THE FOUNTAIN
A101

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set
X
© ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON
X

THE PROPOSED LAND-BRIDGE

LOOKING TOWARDS GREGORY LANE
A102

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set
X
© ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON
X

VIEW FROM THE NORTH SHORE LOOKING

TOWARDS THE FOUNTAIN & LAND-BRIDGE
A103

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set
X
© ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON
X
N

NO SCALE
1 SITE PLAN: 10 YEAR PLAN
A104
GRAND

ELLIPSE
LAWN
SMALL

ELLIPSE
LAWN

GAZEBO TERRACED

SEATING
GRASS
NEW

UNCOVERED
STAGE
BRIDGE
LAND
BRIDGE
KOI
POND
BENCH
BENCH
BLUE
TILE

EQUIPMENT YARD
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER

NEW MULCH PATH

BETWEEN TREES

EXISTING
KNOLL

EXISTING
KNOLL
NEW
INLAID
BRICK
PAVING
NEW CONC. WALK
NEW CONC. WALK
NEW CONC. WALK

NEW LOW

WATERFALL

VERTICAL WATER FEATURE & AERATOR EXISTING

ROSE ARBOR
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER
NEW

TREE AND

PLANTER

SITTING
AREA

SITTING
AREA
GRASS
GRASS

BUILDING
SIGN
AND
FLAG
POLES
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH

NEW MULCH PATH

BETWEEN TREES

NEW MULCH PATH

BETWEEN TREES
LAKE

LANDSCAPE SCREEN ON EXISTING
KNOLL
NEW CONC. WALK

EXISTING
KNOLL
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW

TREE NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW

TREE NEW

TREE NEW
TREE
ROW OF
20'-30' TALL TREES
ROW OF
30'-40' TALL TREES
GRASS
GRASS

EMBANKMENT

GRASS GRASS

FOUNTAIN
ENTRY
PLAZA

FOUNTAIN
PLAZA

ALTERNATE KOI POND PARTITION

LOCATION PUBLIC

PARKING

EMPLOYEE

PARKING
CITY

COUNCIL

BUILDING

COMMUNITY

BUILDING
CITY

ADMINISTRATION

BUILDING
NEW CONC. WALK
NEW CONC. WALK
ROW OF
30'-40' TALL TREES
ROW OF
20'-30' TALL TREES
ROW OF
20'-30' TALL TREES
ROW OF
30'-40' TALL TREES

TERRACED

SEATING

VERTICAL WATER FEATURE

LANDSCAPE SCREEN ON EXISTING
KNOLL

EXISTING

LARGE OAK
TREE

EXISTING
LARGE

TREE NEW LANDSCAPE SCREEN

NEW LANDSCAPE SCREEN

NEW LANDSCAPE SCREEN
VERTICAL WATER FEATURE AT EACH BLDG. COLUMN

FOR WATER SHOWS
VERTICAL WATER FEATURE AT EACH BLDG. COLUMN

FOR WATER SHOWS
CURVED

GALLERY
CURVED

GALLERY
WATER

TEMPLE VERTICAL WATER FEATURE & AERATOR
VERTICAL WATER FEATURE NEW CONC. WALK
BLUE
TILE
BLUE
TILE
POOL
POOL
POOL
POOL

POOL POOL

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set
X
© ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON
X
N
SCALE: 1/4" = 1' - 0"
1 FOUNTAIN PLAN A105
POOL #1
POOL #2
POOL #3
POOL #4
POOL #5
POOL #6

KOI POND
LAKE

EQUIPMENT
YARD

NEW BLUE TILE

WALKING SURFACE

NEW LAND

BRIDGE COMMUNITY

MEETING

BUILDING

TILE WALL
+12" ABOVE

NEW PLAZA

SUBMERGED

PRE-CAST CONCRETE
BOATSKOI SHELTERS

PRE-CAST
CONC. BOAT

WATER PLAY

EXISTING
PLAZA

NEW BLUE TILE

WALKING SURFACE
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH

FOUNTAIN
CITY

COUNCIL

CHAMBERS

BUILDING

NEW CONCRETE WALK

ALONG KOI POND

EXISTING

SEEDED PEBBLE

WALKWALKS

EXISTING

SEEDED PEBBLE

WALKWALKS
BENCH

BENCH BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH

ORNAMENTAL

CATCH-BASIN

WITH GRATE
BENCH
NEW 12" WIDE

TILE INLAY TO

REPLACE EXISTING
INLAYS
TYP.

NEW 12" WIDE

TILE INLAY
TYP.

NEW BLUE TILE

WALKING SURFACE
CURVED

GALLERY
WATER
TEMPLE
NEW 12" WIDE

TILE INLAY TO

REPLACE EXISTING
INLAYS
TYP.

BENCH
BENCH

NEW BLUE TILE

WALKING SURFACE

NEW BLUE TILE

WALKING SURFACE

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options) POOL #3

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set
X
© ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON
X
N
SCALE: 1/4" = 1' - 0"
1 KOI POND A106

KOI POND

COMMUNITY

MEETING

BUILDING

KOI POND
POOL #4
POOL #5
POOL #6

NEW LAND
BRIDGE

TILE WALL
+12" ABOVE

NEW PLAZA

PRE-CAST CONCRETE

SUNKEN BOATS

KOI SHELTERS

PRE-CAST
CONC. BOAT

WATER PLAY

NEW BLUE TILE

WALKING SURFACE
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH

PLANTER

FOUNTAIN

NEW CONCRETE WALK

ALONG KOI POND

ORNAMENTAL

CATCH-BASIN

WITH GRATE
NEW 12" WIDE

TILE INLAY TO

REPLACE EXISTING
INLAYS
TYP.

NEW CONCRETE WALK

ALONG KOI POND

NEW PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE

PRE-CAST CONCRETE

SUNKEN BOATS

KOI SHELTERS
& WATER DISPLAY
& AERATOR
BENCH

NEW CONCRETE WALK

ALONG KOI POND

NEW CONCRETE WALK

TO KOI POND
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH
BENCH

EXISTING

SEEDED PEBBLE

WALKWALKS

LOCATION OF CONCRETE

BULKHEAD

FOR SMALL KOI POND

NEW CONCRETE WALK

EXISTING

CONCRETE
WALK

EXISTING

CONCRETE
WALK
NEW

LANDSCAPE

SCREENING
NEW

LANDSCAPE

SCREENING
NEW

LANDSCAPE

SCREENING

WATER DISPLAY
& AERATOR

NEW CONCRETE WALK

ALONG KOI POND

NEW BLUE TILE

WALKING SURFACE

NEW BLUE TILE

WALKING SURFACE

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set
X
© ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON
X
SCALE: 1/4" = 1' - 0"
1 EAST PARKING LOT ENTRY IMPROVEMENTS A108

EXISTING

CONCRETE
WALK
CURVED

GALLERY

KOI POND

PRE-CAST CONCRETE

SUNKEN BOATS

KOI SHELTERS
& WATER DISPLAY
& AERATOR

NEW CONCRETE WALK

ALONG KOI POND

EXISTING

CONCRETE
WALK
LAKE

VERTICAL

WATER DISPLAY
& AERATOR

NEW TREE

EXISTING LIGHT

NEW INLAID BRICK
PAVING

OVER CONCRETE SLAB

CONCRETE

PERIMETER
BAND

CONCRETE

PERIMETER
BAND

NEW TILING

AT EXISTING

CONCRETE

PEDESTRALS

NEW TILING

AT EXISTING

CONCRETE

PEDESTRALS

NEW TREE

NEW TILING

AT EXISTING

CONCRETE

PEDESTRALS

EXISTING

PLANTER

NEW TREE

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set
X
© ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON
X
N
SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0"
1 PLAZA PLAN; WEST A107
GRASS

SITTING
AREA
GRASS
GRASS

BUILDING SIGN

AND FLAG POLES
CITY

COUNCIL

CHAMBERS

BUILDING
CITY

ADMINSITRATION

BUILDING
NEW
TREE
AND

PLANTER
NEW
TREE
AND

PLANTER

SITTING
AREA

SITTING
AREA
GRASS

EXISTING

ENTRANCE
PLAZA

SITTING
AREA

EXISTING
GAZEBO

EXISTING
TREE

EXISTING
TREE
BUS
STOP

SHELTER
BUS
STOP

SHELTER
GRASS
GRASS

EXISTING

SEEDED PEBBLE

WALKWALKS

EXISTING

SEEDED PEBBLE

WALKWALKS
NEW 12" WIDE

TILE INLAY
TYP.

NEW 12" WIDE

TILE INLAY
TYP.

BENCH

BENCH BENCH BENCH BENCHBENCH BENCH BENCH BENCH

FENCE FENCE

EXISTING

FOUNTAIN
PLAZA

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

Scale:

Drawn by:

Job:

Sheet:
of:

JAN 23, 2023

AS-NOTED

RNA STAFF
PHCC
Revisions: Date:

Preliminary Set
Design Review Set
Plan Check Set
Permit Set
Construction Set
X
© ROBERT NEBOLON ARCHITECTS, ROBERT NEBOLON
X
N
SCALE: 1/8" = 1' - 0"
1 SITE PLAN: PARK IMPROVMENTS
A109
GRAND

ELLIPSE
LAWN
GAZEBO
GRASS
GRASS
GRASS
GRASS
NEW

UNCOVERED
STAGE
LAKE
NEW
TREE
AND

PLANTER

NEW MULCH PATH

BETWEEN TREES
(DASHED LINES)

EXISTING
KNOLL

NEW MULCH PATH

BETWEEN TREES
(DASHED LINES)

NEW CONCRETE
WALK

EXISTING

ROSE ARBOR
ROW OF 20'-30'

TALL TREES

PARKING
LOT
ROW OF 30'-40'

TALL TREES
NEW
TREE
AND

PLANTER

TERRACED

SEATING

PARKING
LOT
ROW OF 20'-30'

TALL TREES
ROW OF 30'-40'

TALL TREES

NEW CONCRETE
WALK
GRASS

EMBANKMENT
GRASS

EMBANKMENT

NEW CONCRETE
WALK

EXISTING

CONCRETE
WALK

EXISTING

CONCRETE
WALK

EXISTING

CONCRETE
WALK
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE
NEW
TREE

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options) __________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 801  Camelia Street,    Suite  E
Berkeley,  CA  94710
Web site:   www.RNarchitect.com                        IG: robertnebolon                                     Phone: 510.525.2725 Progress Model of the entire fountain and land-bridge proposal

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options) ELEVATION: Stair #2 - Donor Tile Landscape
SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0”
Aitken &
Locke
1st
Nationwide
Bank
Alkire
Children
J & M
Alkire
B & L
Davidson

K,W, T, J, J
DeGear
Charron
Family
Church of
Jesus Christ
of LOS
Chateau of
Pleasant Hill
D & K Danford J David V & D Davis B & J Deas T Delcarlo Diablo Singles
Dance Club
Denton
Family J & S
Derespini
J & J Allan A & C
Amador M Amador American
Family
Sauna &
Tub

S, D, S & S
Anderson
Baha'is of
PH 147
C & A
Baker
M & R
Baker
J & H
Baldwin R & D Bales Bank of
America
Barbanica
Family
L & R
Barker

J, L, B, P & S
Barry
Bataan
Death March
Corregidor
Blood Bank
of the ACCMA J Batey D Benton E & D Barr
W & A
Branum
Brauer
Family
Broman
Family
Brown &
Caldwell
R & N
Bruce
D & D
Buckley
E & M
Budzynski
Bush &
Stein
R & J
Butler
J
Buttereld
J & J
Bystrom

S, C & J
Cabral
MJ
Caldwell
H & C
Canty
Carducci
Associates
Carrier
Air Group
Carver
Family J, R & B
Chapin
B Chaney
Harley
Davidson G Bullock R Bunyard J Burns M Buxton E & SC Byers D Byrd C Castelline Certied
Farmers'
Market
Cain, Ray,
McLennan,
Stribling
D Catalano D Cere Cervelli H Cervi J Cervi B Checchi Choi Church 4 US Church 4 US C & L Clark P & E Clark KC Clement R Courtway R Cox H & D Coyle W Crawford E Crothers J Crothers ELS Cummings RD RB Curtis
J & J
Crawford Creative
Play Center
Custom
Color Studios
DWP
Architects
Damianakes
Families
Cro
ord
H Conners Family Corrigan
Family
Mexico
Chilpancingo
H Chin &
Family

D, D, D
Christensen
H & E
Christman
L & D
Connolly
J & M
Corder
A & B
Courtway
Contra Costa
Centre Assoc.

Contra Costa
Grandmothers
#753
D & M
Development
Co
College
Park High
1990-91
College
Park High
Falcon Bands
Jerry & Co.

Beck
J & L
Beck C & R
Beeton
H L Family
Beeton
R & M
Beeton
C & J
Bennett
Bennett-Smith
Women
A & E
Berggren
C & H
Berggren
D & B
Berggren
Better Homes
Realty
J & B
Bevers
Bischo

Family
D & M
Black
K & M
Beam
D
Boatwright
VJ
Bodhaine
G & P
Bonnar

D, J, T
Bostrom
C & T
Bowen
Boy Scout
Troop 401
Boy Scout
Troop 277
Boy Scout
Troop 282
K & B
Brandt
M
Bransford
W & A
Branum
RC
Bodhaine
Family
DV
Bodhaine
Family
CH
Blake

L, B D, T, T
Baltezore Beck A & I
Ashley
M & F
Ashoo D & P Asvit Antonini
Family N Angel Arieys
Aitken &
Locke
1st
Nationwide
Bank
Alkire
Children
J & M
Alkire J & J Allan A & C
Amador M Amador American
Family
Sauna &
Tub

S, D, S & S
Anderson
Baha'is of
PH 147
C & A
Baker
M & R
Baker
J & H
Baldwin R & D Bales Bank of
America
Barbanica
Family
L & R
Barker

J, L, B, P & S
Barry
Bataan
Death March
Corregidor
Blood Bank
of the ACCMA J Batey D Benton E & D Barr Jerry & Co.Beck J & L
Beck C & R
Beeton
H L Family
Beeton
R & M
Beeton
C & J
Bennett
Bennett-Smith
Women
A & E
Berggren
D & B
Berggren
Better Homes
Realty
J & B
Bevers
Bischo

Family
D & M
Black
K & M
Beam
D
Boatwright
VJ
Bodhaine
G & P
Bonnar

D, J, T
Bostrom
C & T
Bowen
Boy Scout
Troop 401
Boy Scout
Troop 277
Boy Scout
Troop 282
K & B
Brandt
M
Bransford
W & A
Branum L Bonnett
RC
Bodhaine
Family
DV
Bodhaine
Family
CH
Blake

L, B D, T, T
Baltezore Beck A & I
Ashley
M & F
Ashoo Andrighetto D & P Asvit AntoniniFamily N Angel Arieys Aitken &
Locke
Alkire
Children
J & M
Alkire J & J Allan A & C
Amador M Amador American
Family
Sauna &
Tub

S, D, S & S
Anderson
Baha'is of
PH 147
C & A
Baker
M & R
Baker
J & H
Baldwin R & D Bales Bank of America
Barbanica
Family
L & R
Barker

J, L, B, P & S
Barry
Bataan
Death March
Corregidor
Blood Bank
of the ACCMA J Batey D Benton E & D Barr Jerry & Co.Beck J & L
Beck C & R
Beeton
H L Family
Beeton
R & M
Beeton
C & J
Bennett
Bennett-Smith
Women
A & E
Berggren
C & H
Berggren
D & B
Berggren
Better Homes
Realty
J & B
Bevers
D & M
Black
K & M
Beam
D
Boatwright
VJ
Bodhaine
G & P
Bonnar

D, J, T
Bostrom
C & T
Bowen
Boy Scout
Troop 401
Boy Scout
Troop 277
Boy Scout
Troop 282
K & B
Brandt
M
Bransford
W & A
Branum L Bonnett
RC
Bodhaine
Family
DV
Bodhaine
Family
CH
Blake

L, B D, T, T
Baltezore Beck A & I
Ashley
M & F
Ashoo Andrighetto D & P Asvit Antonini
Family N Angel Arieys
Charron
Family
Church of
Jesus Christ
of LOS
Chateau of
Pleasant Hill

D, D, D
Christensen
H & E
Christman
L & D
Connolly
M & P
Cooper
J & M
Corder
Contra Costa
Centre Assoc.

Contra Costa
Grandmothers
#753
R Courtway R Cox H & D Coyle W Crawford E Crothers ELS
Cummings RD RB Curtis
J & J
Crawford Creative
Play Center
Custom
Color Studios
DWP
Architects
Damianakes
Families
Cro
ord
Family Corrigan
Family
A & B
Courtway
D & M
Development
Co
College
Park High
1990-91
College
Park High
Falcon Bands
W & A
Branum
Brauer
Family
Broman
Family
Brown &
Caldwell
R & N
Bruce
D & D
Buckley
E & M
Budzynski
Bush &
Stein
R & J
Butler
J
Buttereld G Bullock R Bunyard J Burns D Busalak M Buxton E & SC Byers K & B
Brandt
M
Bransford
W & A
Branum
W & A
Branum
Brauer
Family
Broman
Family
Brown &
Caldwell
R & N
Bruce
D & D
Buckley
E & M
Budzynski
Bush &
Stein
R & J
Butler
J
Buttereld G Bullock R Bunyard J Burns D Busalak M Buxton E & SC Byers K & B
Brandt
M
Bransford
W & A
Branum
W & A
Branum
Brauer
Family
Broman
Family
Brown &
Caldwell
R & N
Bruce
D & D
Buckley
E & M
Budzynski
Bush &
Stein
R & J
Butler G Bullock R Bunyard J Burns D Busalak M Buxton E & SC Byers Charron
Family
Church of
Jesus Christ
of LOS
Chateau of
Pleasant Hill
J & J
Bystrom

S, C & J
Cabral
MJ
Caldwell
H & C
Canty
Carducci
Associates
Carrier
Air Group
Carver
Family J, R & B
Chapin
B Chaney
Harley
Davidson D Byrd C Castelline
Certied
Farmers'
Market
Cain, Ray,
McLennan,
Stribling
D Cere Cervelli H Cervi J Cervi B Checchi Choi Church 4 US Church 4 US C & L Clark P & E Clark KC Clement R Courtway R Cox H & D Coyle W Crawford E Crothers J Crothers ELS Cummings RD RB Curtis
J & J
Crawford Creative
Play Center
Custom
Color Studios
DWP
Architects
Damianakes
Families
Cro
ord
H Conners Family Corrigan
Family
Mexico
Chilpancingo
H Chin &
Family

D, D, D
Christensen
H & E
Christman
L & D
Connolly
M & P
Cooper
J & M
Corder
A & B
Courtway
Contra Costa
Centre Assoc.

Contra Costa
Grandmothers
#753
College
Park High
1990-91
College
Park High
Falcon Bands
W & A
Branum
Brauer
Family
Broman
Family
Brown &
Caldwell
R & N
Bruce
D & D
Buckley
E & M
Budzynski
Bush &
Stein
R & J
Butler
J
Buttereld
J & J
Bystrom

S, C & J
Cabral G Bullock R Bunyard J Burns D Busalak M Buxton E & SC Byers D Byrd Cain, Ray,
McLennan,
Stribling
MJ
Caldwell
H & C
Canty
Carducci
Associates
Carrier
Air Group
Carver
Family J, R & B
Chapin
B Chaney
Harley
Davidson
C Castelline
Certied
Farmers'
Market
D Catalano D Cere Cervelli J Cervi
B & L
Davidson

K,W, T, J, J
DeGear D & K Danford J David V & D Davis B & J Deas T Delcarlo Diablo Singles
Dance Club
Denton
Family J & S
Derespini
B & L
Davidson

K,W, T, J, J
DeGear D & K Danford J David V & D Davis B & J Deas Yochs L Young L Young T Delcarlo Diablo Singles
Dance Club
In Honor of
Jean Zais
In Honor of
Mon Zais
Denton
Family J & S
Derespini

B, C, B & R
Young

J, L, B, P & S
Barry
Bataan
Death March
Corregidor
Blood Bank
of the ACCMA J Batey D Benton E & D Barr Jerry & Co.

Beck
J & L
Beck C & R
Beeton
H L Family
Beeton
R & M
Beeton
Bennett-Smith
Women
A & E
Berggren
C & H
Berggren
D & B
Berggren
Better Homes
Realty
J & B
Bevers
Bischo

Family
D & M
Black
K & M
Beam
D
Boatwright
VJ
Bodhaine
G & P
Bonnar

D, J, T
Bostrom
C & T
Bowen
Boy Scout
Troop 401
Boy Scout
Troop 277
Boy Scout
Troop 282 L Bonnett
RC
Bodhaine
Family
DV
Bodhaine
Family
CH
Blake

L, B D, T, T
Beck
Bataan
Death March
Corregidor
Blood Bank
of the ACCMA J Batey D Benton E & D Barr Jerry & Co.

Beck
J & L
Beck C & R
Beeton
H L Family
Beeton
R & M
Beeton
C & J
Bennett
Bennett-Smith
Women
A & E
Berggren
C & H
Berggren
D & B
Berggren
Better Homes
Realty
J & B
Bevers
Bischo

Family
D & M
Black
K & M
Beam
D
Boatwright
VJ
Bodhaine
G & P
Bonnar

D, J, T
Bostrom
C & T
Bowen
Boy Scout
Troop 401
Boy Scout
Troop 277
Boy Scout
Troop 282 L Bonnett
RC
Bodhaine
Family
DV
Bodhaine
Family
CH
Blake

L, B D, T, T
Beck
Aitken &
Locke
1st
Nationwide
Bank
Alkire
Children
J & M
Alkire J & J Allan A & C
Amador M Amador American
Family
Sauna &
Tub

S, D, S & S
Anderson
Baha'is of
PH 147
C & A
Baker
M & R
Baker
J & H
Baldwin R & D Bales Bank of
America
Barbanica
Family
L & R
Barker Baltezore A & I
Ashley
M & F
Ashoo Andrighetto D & P Asvit AntoniniFamily N Angel Arieys Aitken &
Locke
1st
Nationwide
Bank
Alkire
Children
J & M
Alkire J & J Allan A & C
Amador M Amador American
Family
Sauna &
Tub

K,W, T, J, J
DeGear D & K Danford J David V & D Davis B & J Deas T Delcarlo Diablo Singles
Dance Club
Denton
Family J & S
Derespini
Charron
Family
Church of
Jesus Christ
of LOS
Chateau of
Pleasant Hill
J & J
Bystrom

S, C & J
Cabral
MJ
Caldwell
H & C
Canty
Carducci
Associates
Carrier
Air Group
Carver
Family J, R & B
Chapin
B Chaney
Harley
Davidson D Byrd C Castelline
Certied
Farmers'
Market
Cain, Ray,
McLennan,
Stribling
D Catalano D Cere Cervelli H Cervi J Cervi B Checchi Choi Church 4 US Church 4 US C & L Clark P & E Clark KC Clement R Courtway R Cox H & D Coyle W Crawford E Crothers J Crothers ELS Cummings RD RB Curtis
J & J
Crawford Creative
Play Center
Custom
Color Studios
DWP
Architects
Damianakes
Families
Cro
ord
Family H Conners Corrigan
Family
Mexico
Chilpancingo
H Chin &
Family

D, D, D
Christensen
H & E
Christman
L & D
Connolly
M & P
Cooper
J & M
Corder
M & P
Cooper
L Bonnett
C & H
Berggren
Bischo

Family
J & J
Bystrom
D & M
Development
Co

J, L, B, P & S
Barry
A & B
Courtway
Contra Costa
Centre Assoc.

Contra Costa
Grandmothers
#753
D & M
Development
Co
College
Park High
1990-91
College
Park High
Falcon Bands
D Busalak
Andrighetto
1st
Nationwide
Bank
J Crothers
J
Buttereld
D Catalano
H Cervi
C & J
Bennett
The City of Pleasant Hill Civic Center complex was
designed by Charles Moore, FAIA in association with
Fisher Friedman Architects, in 1991. This complex fully embodies Moore’s architectural concepts—a synthesis of
buildings and landscape. Charles Moore, FAIA was the
1991 AIA National Gold recipient, the nation’s highest
honor for an architect to receive.

The City of Pleasant Hill Civic Center acknowledges the inaugural 1991 donors. Thank you to the community
friends and businesses who contributed to the buildings and landscape.

The City of Pleasant Hill
Civic Center
Original donor names to be added to Pleasant Hill
landscape background. New donor names can be added
to green field foreground or sky, as needed.

Direct digital print donor names and image colors to
1/4” birch plywood with maple veneer face, Europly
by Columbia Forest Products.

Cut image grid in 2.5” square pywood tiles and attach to fiber mesh background. Sew horizontal pockets across
top for dowel rod inserts. Z-cleat the dowel rods to wall. 13'-8 1/2"
7'-2 7/8"
20'-5 1/4"
1 TILE ELEVATIONS: 2.5” square tile with .25” text height

FULL SIZE
SAMPLE IMAGES: Direct digital print to wooden tiles
DONOR NAME: ONE LINE
DONOR NAME: TWO LINES
DONOR NAME: THREE LINES
College
Park High
Falcon Bands
Corrigan
Family
D Byrd
1 ELEVATION: Stair #2 - Mural Commission, Juan Carlos Araujo SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0”
The City of Pleasant Hill Civic Center complex was
designed by Charles Moore, FAIA in association with
Fisher Friedman Architects, in 1991. This complex fully embodies Moore’s architectural concepts—a synthesis of
buildings and landscape. Charles Moore, FAIA was the
1991 AIA National Gold recipient, the nation’s highest
honor for an architect to receive.

The City of Pleasant Hill Civic Center acknowledges the inaugural 1991 donors. Thank you to the community
friends and businesses who contributed to the buildings and landscape.

The City of Pleasant Hill
Civic Center
Location specific mural commission with Juan Carlos Araujo.

Juan Carlos Araujo
San Jose
www.empiresevenstudios.com/contact

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options) MURAL SAMPLE IMAGES: Juan Carlos Araujo

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options) ELEVATION: Stair #2 - Mural Commission, Kelly Ordig
SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0”
The City of Pleasant Hill Civic Center complex was
designed by Charles Moore, FAIA in association with
Fisher Friedman Architects, in 1991. This complex fully embodies Moore’s architectural concepts—a synthesis of
buildings and landscape. Charles Moore, FAIA was the
1991 AIA National Gold recipient, the nation’s highest
honor for an architect to receive.

The City of Pleasant Hill Civic Center acknowledges the inaugural 1991 donors. Thank you to the community
friends and businesses who contributed to the buildings and landscape.

The City of Pleasant Hill
Civic Center
Location specific mural commission with Kelly Ordig.

Kelly Ordig
Oakland, CA
www.kellyording.com

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

10.3.a
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

10.3.a
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Conceptual Design Options 1 & 2 (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ϴϬϭĂŵĞůŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞ

ĞƌŬĞůĞǇ͕ϵϰϳϭϬ
tĞďƐŝƚĞ͗ǁǁǁ͘ZEĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚ͘ĐŽŵ/'͗ƌŽďĞƌƚŶĞďŽůŽŶ WŚŽŶĞ͗ϱϭϬ͘ϱϮϱ͘ϮϳϮϱ ŽŶĐĞƉƚƵĂůWŚĂƐĞŽƐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ
WůĞĂƐĂŶƚ,ŝůůŝǀŝĐĞŶƚĞƌ
&ŽƵŶƚĂŝŶΘWůĂǌĂZĞŚĂďŝůŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ
d
͗:ĂŶƵĂƌǇϮϯ͕ϮϬϮϰ

10.3.b
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Design Cost Estimates (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options) WůĞĂƐĂŶƚ,ŝůůŝǀŝĐĞŶƚĞƌ
&ŽƵŶƚĂŝŶWůĂǌĂZĞŚĂďŝůŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ
KE
Wdh>W,^
K^d
^d/Dd

W>
^^Ed,/>>/dz,>>WKEE&KhEd/EZ
,/>/dd/KEWZK:
d
ĂƚĞ͗:ĂŶƵĂƌǇϮϯ͕ϮϬϮϰ
ŽƐƚ
KƉƚŝŽŶηϭ
&ŽƵŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĚWůĂǌĂƚŝůĞƌĞƉůĂĐŵĞŶƚ͖DŝŶŽƌ&ŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƉůƵŵďŝŶŐƵƉŐƌĂĚĞƐĂŶĚ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚ͘<ŽŝƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ
ϭ ZĞŵŽǀĞĂŶĚƌĞƉůĂĐĞĂůůĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƚŝůĞϮϬϬϬ^&;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶͿǁͬĞƉŽǆǇŐƌŽƵƚ ΨϭϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯ ZĞŵŽǀĞĂŶĚZĞƉůĂĐĞWůĂǌĂƚŝůĞϮϴϬϬ^&;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶͿǁͬĞƉŽǆǇŐƌŽƵƚ ΨϭϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϯ ĂƵůŬŝŶŐWůĂǌĂdŝůĞĞĚŐĞƐ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϰ EĞǁĐŽŵŵĞŵŽƌĂƚŝǀĞǁĂůůͲŵŽƵŶƚĞĚƐŝŐŶĂŐĞĚŝƐƉůĂǇŝŶ^ƚĂŝƌůŽďďǇ Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϱ ZĞƉůĂĐĞŽůĚĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŶĞǁĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ ΨϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϲ
WƵŵƉƌŽŽŵƌĞƉĂŝƌƐǁŝƚŚŶĞǁĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽƌĞƉůĂĐĞŽůĚĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ƉŝƉŝŶŐĂŶĚ ǀĂůǀĞƐĂƚŶĞǁĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ĚĞŵŽŽĨĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƉĂĚƐ ΨϭϴϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϳ DŽǀĞƉƵŵƉƌŽŽŵĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽĐŽŵƉůǇǁŝƚŚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůĐŽĚĞ ΨϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϴ
ƌĂŝŶĂůůǁĂƚĞƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ;ƉŽŶĚ͕ůĂŬĞ͕ĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶͿĂŶĚƌĞŵŽǀĞƐůƵĚŐĞĂŶĚĚĞďƌŝƐ͘ ZĞŵŽǀĂůŽĨƉŝƉĞƐĐĂůĞ͘ƌĂĐŬƌĞƉĂŝƌ ΨϴϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϵ ZĞƉĂŝƌͬƌĞƉůĂĐĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁĂƚĞƌĚŝƐƉůĂǇƐ͕ǁĂƚĞƌũĞƚƐ͕ĂĞƌĂƚŽƌƐĂƚƉŽŶĚĂŶĚůĂŬĞ ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬ <Žŝ,ĞƌĚŝŶŐ͗ƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇŚŽůĚŝŶŐƚĂŶŬƐŽƌĚƌĂŝŶĂŐĞƉŚĂƐŝŶŐ Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϭ
ZĞŵŽǀĞƐĐĂůĞďƵŝůĚͲƵƉŽŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇƌŽŽŵǁĂƚĞƌͲůŝŶĞƚŝůĞĂŶĚ>ĂŬĞǁĂƚĞƌͲůŝŶĞƚŝůĞ ĂůŽŶŐĐƵƌǀĞĚŐĂůůĞƌǇ Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϭϮ
,sĚŝƐĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĨƌŽŵĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƐǇƐƚĞŵ͖ŝŶƐƚĂůůŶĞǁĐŽŶĚĞŶƐŽƌƵŶŝƚŝŶĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ ǇĂƌĚ͖ŶĞǁƵͬŐƉŝƉŝŶŐĨƌŽŵŶĞǁƉĂĚĂƌĞĂƚŽĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ,sĂŝƌŚĂŶĚůĞƌƐ Ψϴϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϯ
EĞǁůŝƋƵŝĚͲĂƉƉůŝĞĚƐĞĂůĞƌŽŶĂůůǁĂƚĞƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƉŽǁĞƌ ǁĂƐŚ͘ϭϯ͕ϭϬϬ^& ΨϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϭϰ ^^&ĞĞƐ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϭϱ
Dh&ĞĞƐ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϭϲ DŝƐĐĨĞĞƐ;ƐůƵĚŐĞƚĞƐƚŝŶŐ͕Ϳ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
^ƵďƚŽƚĂů Ψ ϴϳϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ŽŶƚŝŶŐĞŶĐǇ;ϭϬйͿ Ψ ϴϳ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
^ƵďƚŽƚĂůKƉƚŝŽŶηϭĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐ Ψϵϱϳ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ KƉƚŝŽŶηϭŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚĞƐŝŐŶ&ĞĞƐ ΨϭϮϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
'ĞŶĞƌĂůZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ;ŝǀ͘ϭͿ;ϭϬйͿ Ψ ϵϱ͕ϳϬϬ͘ϬϬ &ŝŶĂůƚŽƚĂůKƉƚŝŽŶηϭŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽƐƚƐKŶůǇ Ψϭ͕ϬϱϮ͕ϳϬϬ͘ϬϬ &ŝŶĂůdŽƚĂůKƉƚŝŽŶηϭŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽƐƚƐнKƉƚŝŽŶηϭŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚ&ĞĞƐ Ψϭ͕ϭϳϰ͕ϳϬϬ͘ϬϬ WĂŐĞϭŽĨϰ

10.3.b
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Design Cost Estimates (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options) WůĞĂƐĂŶƚ,ŝůůŝǀŝĐĞŶƚĞƌ
&ŽƵŶƚĂŝŶWůĂǌĂZĞŚĂďŝůŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ
KƉƚŝŽŶηϮͲ&ŽƵŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĚWůĂǌĂZĞƉĂŝƌƐ͗KƉƚŝŽŶηϭĐŽƐƚƐн^ŵĂůů<ŽŝWŽŶĚ^ŽůƵƚŝŽŶ ϭϳ ZĞŵŽǀĞĂŶĚƌĞƉůĂĐĞĂůůĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƚŝůĞϮϬϬϬ^&;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶͿǁͬĞƉŽǆǇŐƌŽƵƚ ΨϭϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϴ ZĞŵŽǀĞĂŶĚZĞƉůĂĐĞWůĂǌĂƚŝůĞϮϴϬϬ^&;ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĚĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶͿǁͬĞƉŽǆǇŐƌŽƵƚ ΨϭϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϵ ĂƵůŬŝŶŐWůĂǌĂdŝůĞĞĚŐĞƐ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϮϬ EĞǁĐŽŵŵĞŵŽƌĂƚŝǀĞǁĂůůͲŵŽƵŶƚĞĚƐŝŐŶĂŐĞĚŝƐƉůĂǇ Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯϭ ZĞƉůĂĐĞŽůĚĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŶĞǁĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ ΨϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϮϮ
WƵŵƉƌŽŽŵƌĞƉĂŝƌƐǁŝƚŚŶĞǁĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽƌĞƉůĂĐĞŽůĚĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ƉŝƉŝŶŐĂŶĚ ǀĂůǀĞƐĂƚŶĞǁĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ĚĞŵŽŽĨĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƉĂĚƐ ΨϭϴϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯϯ DŽǀĞƉƵŵƉƌŽŽŵĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽĐŽŵƉůǇǁŝƚŚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůĐŽĚĞ ΨϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯϰ
ƌĂŝŶĂůůǁĂƚĞƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ;ƉŽŶĚ͕ůĂŬĞ͕ĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶͿĂŶĚƌĞŵŽǀĞƐůƵĚŐĞĂŶĚĚĞďƌŝƐ͘ ZĞŵŽǀĂůŽĨƉŝƉĞƐĐĂůĞ͘ƌĂĐŬƌĞƉĂŝƌ ΨϴϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯϱ ZĞƉĂŝƌͬƌĞƉůĂĐĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁĂƚĞƌĚŝƐƉůĂǇƐ͕ǁĂƚĞƌũĞƚƐ͕ĂĞƌĂƚŽƌƐĂƚƉŽŶĚĂŶĚůĂŬĞ ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲ <Žŝ,ĞƌĚŝŶŐ͗ƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇŚŽůĚŝŶŐƚĂŶŬƐŽƌĚƌĂŝŶĂŐĞƉŚĂƐŝŶŐ Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳ
ZĞŵŽǀĞƐĐĂůĞďƵŝůĚͲƵƉŽŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇƌŽŽŵǁĂƚĞƌͲůŝŶĞƚŝůĞĂŶĚ>ĂŬĞǁĂƚĞƌͲůŝŶĞƚŝůĞ ĂůŽŶŐĐƵƌǀĞĚŐĂůůĞƌǇ Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
Ϯϴ
,sĚŝƐĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĨƌŽŵĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƐǇƐƚĞŵ͖ŝŶƐƚĂůůŶĞǁĐŽŶĚĞŶƐŽƌƵŶŝƚŝŶĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ ǇĂƌĚ͖ŶĞǁƵͬŐƉŝƉŝŶŐĨƌŽŵŶĞǁƉĂĚĂƌĞĂƚŽĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ,sĂŝƌŚĂŶĚůĞƌƐ Ψϴϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ϯϵ
EĞǁůŝƋƵŝĚͲĂƉƉůŝĞĚƐĞĂůĞƌŽŶĂůůǁĂƚĞƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƉŽǁĞƌ ǁĂƐŚ͘ϭϯ͕ϭϬϬ^& ΨϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϯϬ ^^&ĞĞƐ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϯϭ
Dh&ĞĞƐ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϯϮ DŝƐĐĨĞĞƐ;ƐůƵĚŐĞƚĞƐƚŝŶŐ͕Ϳ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϯϯ EĞǁϱϮϬ^&ůĂŶĚͲďƌŝĚŐĞƚŽƉŽŶĚŶŽƌƚŚĞŶĚƚŽƌĞĂĐŚŶĞǁƐŵĂůůƐŝƚƚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂ Ψϳϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϯϰ
>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞ^ĐƌĞĞŶ͗>ĂŶĚĐĂƉĞϭϮϬϬ^&ŽĨŶŽƌƚŚůĂǁŶĂůŽŶŐ'ƌĞŐŽƌǇ>ĂŶĞΘĂƚŶŽƌƚŚ ĞŶĚŽĨůĂŶĚͲďƌŝĚŐĞ͘ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϯϱ ϭϱϬ^&ŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ&ůĂƚǁŽƌŬŽŶŶŽƌƚŚĞŶĚŽĨŶĞǁůĂŶĚͲďƌŝĚŐĞ Ψϰ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϯϲ
ϰWƌĞͲĐĂƐƚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞďŽĂƚĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶͬǁĂƚĞƌͲƉůĂǇĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐͬĚĞůŝŐŚƚ͕ĂŶĚ<ŽŝWƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶΘ ŚĂďŝƚĂƚ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϯϳ ϲƐŝƚƚŝŶŐďĞŶĐŚĞƐĂƚŶŽƌƚŚĞŶĚĂŶĚĞĂƐƚƐŝĚĞ ΨϭϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϯϴ EĞǁĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĨůĂƚǁŽƌŬǁĂůŬǁĂǇĂůŽŶŐĞĂƐƚĞƌŶĞĚŐĞŽĨƐŵĂůů<ŽŝƉŽŶĚ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϯϵ
EĞǁϭϮϬϬ^&ďůƵĞƉůĂǌĂƚŝůĞĂƚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĨůĂƚǁŽƌŬƌĞƉĂŝƌƐĨŽƌŶĞǁƵŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚ ĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƉŝƉŝŶŐΘůĂŶĚďƌŝĚŐĞ Ψϰϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϰϬ ŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐĂǁͲĐƵƚƚŝŶŐƚŽƉůĂĐĞŶĞǁĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƉŝƉŝŶŐ ΨϭϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϰϭ EĞǁĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĨůĂƚǁŽƌŬƵŶĚĞƌďůƵĞƉůĂǌĂƚŝůĞ;ůĂŶĚͲďƌŝĚŐĞĞǆĐůƵĚĞĚͿ Ψϭϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϰϮ
ZĞŵŽĚĞůƉƵŵƉƌŽŽŵƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂĐŚĞŵŝĐĂůůǇͲƚƌĞĂƚĞĚĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĚůĂŬĞƐǇƐƚĞŵ͕ŶĞǁ ƉŝƉŝŶŐ͕ĨŝůƚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐǇƐƚĞŵƵƉŐƌĂĚĞƐ͘ ΨϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϰϯ
EĞǁŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚ<ŽŝƉŽŶĚĨŝůƚƌĂƚŝŽŶƐǇƐƚĞŵŝŶĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚǇĂƌĚ͘/ŶĐůƵĚĞƐŶĞǁƉŝƉŝŶŐ ĂŶĚĨŝƚƚŝŶŐƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŶĞǁŬŽŝƐǇƐƚĞŵ ΨϮϳϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ϰϰ EĞǁƐŚĞĚĨŽƌŬŽŝƉŽŶĚĨŝůƚƌĂƚŝŽŶƐǇƐƚĞŵ Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ WĂŐĞϮŽĨϰ

10.3.b
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Design Cost Estimates (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options) WůĞĂƐĂŶƚ,ŝůůŝǀŝĐĞŶƚĞƌ
&ŽƵŶƚĂŝŶWůĂǌĂZĞŚĂďŝůŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ
KƉƚŝŽŶηϮĐŽƐƚƐͲͲĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚ
ϰϱ
>ĂƌŐĞůĂŬĞƌĞƉĂŝƌƐĂŶĚŶĞǁǁĂƚĞƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞ;ǁĂƚĞƌĨĂůůĂƚǁĂƚĞƌƚĞŵƉůĞͿ͕ŶĞǁ ƵŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚƉŝƉŝŶŐĨƌŽŵĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƚŽůĂŬĞƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞƚǁŽƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞǁĂƚĞƌƐǇƐƚĞŵƐ ΨϭϬϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϰϲ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůǁĂƚĞƌĚŝƐƉůĂǇŝƚĞŵƐŝŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǁĂƚĞƌĚŝƐƉůĂǇƐ ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϰϳ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐĂƚůĂŬĞĂŶĚŬŽŝƉŽŶĚ;ŝŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶŽĨĐŽƐƚƐŝŶKƉƚ͘ηϭͿ ΨϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϰϴ EĞǁĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞďƵůŬŚĞĂĚ;ĚŝǀŝĚĞƌďĞǁĞĞŶĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŶĞǁƐŵĂůůŬŽŝƉŽŶĚͿ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ϰϵ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĚ
ϱϬ ƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĚ
ϱϭ
ůƚĞƌ<ŽŝƉŽŽůďŽƚƚŽŵĨŽƌĂďĞƚƚĞƌ<ŽŝŚĂďŝƚĂƚ͗;ϭͿϮΖǆϰΖǆϭϮΗĞǆĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ ǁŽƌŬ͕ĂŶĚtWŵĞŵďƌĂŶĞƌĞƉĂŝƌƐ͘ Ψϰϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
^ƵďƚŽƚĂů Ψϭ͕ϴϲϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
ŽŶƚŝŶŐĞŶĐǇ;ϭϬйͿ Ψϭϴϲ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ
^ƵďƚŽƚĂůKƉƚŝŽŶηϮĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐ͗ ΨϮ͕Ϭϰϳ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ KƉƚŝŽŶηϮŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚĞƐŝŐŶ&ĞĞƐ ΨϮϬϮ͕ϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ
'ĞŶĞƌĂůZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ;ŝǀ͘ϭͿ;ϭϬйͿ Ψ ϮϬϰ͕ϳϭϬ͘ϬϬ &ŝŶĂůƚŽƚĂůKƉƚŝŽŶηϮŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽƐƚƐKŶůǇ ΨϮ͕Ϯϱϭ͕ϴϭϬ͘ϬϬ &ŝŶĂůdŽƚĂůKƉƚŝŽŶηϮŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽƐƚƐ;ŚĂƌĚĂŶĚƐŽĨƚĐŽƐƚƐͿ ΨϮ͕ϰϱϰ͕ϮϭϬ͘ϬϬ WĂŐĞϯŽĨϰ

10.3.b
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Design Cost Estimates (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options) Pleasant Hill Civic Center
Fountain Plaza Rehabilitation
Line‐item options to consider adding to Option #2.
52 Raise Grade at east side of Lake to correct drainage issues (mucky turf). Install new drainage and link to existing drainage system $          75,000.00 53 (2)  more  Pre‐cast concrete boat fountain /water‐play features/delight, and Koi Protection (in addition to Option #2 costs) $          10,000.00 54 New independent Koi pond filtration system sized for larger koi pond‐‐placed in equipment yard (in addition to costs in Option #2) $          70,000.00 55 Alter Koi pool bottom for a better Koi habitat: (2) more 2'x4'x12" excavation concrete work, and WP membrane repairs; for a total of 3 new koi areas (in addition to Option #2 costs) $          90,000.00
56 less concrete bulwark in Option #2 $       (25,000.00) 57 Landscape Screen:  1800 SF new trees and low plantings to existing grass area along Gregory Lane between equipment yard  and concrete Civic Center Sign east side‐ to screen views of traffic and street (in addition to costs in Option #2) $          36,000.00 58 Concrete flatwork to connect new sitting area (see option #2) to East side of Pond sitting area (see option 2) and connect to Gregory lane sidewalk and new bridge‐‐to create a pedestrian loop around koi pond and fountain. $          20,000.00 59 Add metal bridge (and concrete footings) across pond and behind existing concrete Civic Center sign $          30,000.00
60 2 more  sitting benches at north end and east side (in addition to Option #2 costs) $            4,000.00 61 Remodel east curved gallery entryway at public parking lotwith inlaid brick paving and additional new trees (includes demolition) $          75,000.00 62 New concrete walk ways and landscape buffer zone along east edge of lake $          25,000.00 63 landscape along concrete walk & buffer zone  (1600 SF) $         32,000.00 Subtotal $      442,000.00
Note: Add 30% to each line item for contingency + Div. 1 costs + consultant fees Costs Summary:

Option #1 costs $ 1,174,700.00
Option #2 costs $ 2,454,210.00

Page 4 of 4 ends

10.3.b
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Design Cost Estimates (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

10.3.b
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Design Cost Estimates (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Option 1 Funding Sources
$1,174,700 1 City Hall Fountain and Pond Project (ARPA) $815,000 2 ADA Improvements IP-2 (Gas Tax Fund 12) $225,000
3 Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure M-4 (Measure J/K) $174,000 TOTAL $1,214,000
Option 2 Funding Sources
$2,454,210 1 City Hall Fountain and Pond Project (ARPA) $815,000 2 ADA Improvements IP-2 (Gas Tax Fund 12) $225,000
3 Sidewalk Maintenance/Gap Closure M-4 (Measure J/K) $174,000 4 Storm Drain Improvements MK-2 (Measure K) from FY 22-23 $620,000 5 Additional Funds Needed: Measure K, ARPA, or Other Funds* $620,210 TOTAL $2,454,210
Funding Sources for City Hall Pond and Fountain Project Design City of Pleasant Hill

10.3.b
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - Conceptual Design Cost Estimates (City Hall Pond and Fountain Project - Design Options)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: February 26, 2024
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. ___-24 AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (CCTA) AND THE

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL FOR COST SHARING COMMITMENTS TO

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT THE CCTA COUNTYWIDE SMART

SIGNALS PROJECT

SYNOPSIS
The Countywide Smart Signals Project is a Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA)-led project to upgrade the traffic signal and communication systems on major arterial corridors throughout the County’s 19 cities and unincorporated communities utilizing grant funds received from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC’s) One Bay Area Cycle 3 (OBAG 3) for design, construction, and deployment of the Project. In the City of Pleasant Hill, this project will upgrade 20 signals along or adjacent to Contra Costa Boulevard, Monument Boulevard, and Taylor Boulevard. The preliminary estimated cost of this project in Pleasant Hill is $1,332,258.

The estimated required local match funds of 11.47% from the City to participate in the CCTA Project is $152,810. The local match funds would come from the City’s Measure K Pedestrian and Bicycle Program for FY 2024/25. The project would be added to the upcoming FY 2024/25 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) project list.

The purpose of this item is for the City Council to consider adopting the proposed resolution (attached) authorizing the City Manager to execute a funding agreement committing a local match of $152,810 for the Countywide Smart Signals Project in Pleasant Hill sponsored by Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA).

DISCUSSION
Background
On September 12, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution No. 76-22, authorizing the City Engineer to partner with CCTA on a multi-agency grant proposal to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Countywide Smart Signals Project (see Attachment 2).

CCTA successfully secured $26.55 million in regional funding in January 2023 for the project to develop, manage, and implement Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) initiatives such as

10.4 Packet Pg. 324
upgrading the existing legacy systems, providing interconnectivity throughout Contra Costa County signal systems, and enhancing the sharing of real-time information between agencies and the public.

The signals identified for this project are located along major arterials, including the ones identified as Routes of Regional Significance in the local jurisdictions across the county. This project will improve 20 traffic signals in Pleasant Hill along three major arterials (Contra Costa Boulevard, Taylor Boulevard, Monument Boulevard) for a project cost of $1,332,258. This is an increase in both the number of traffic signals (15 to 20) and the cost ($970,000 to $1,332,258) compared to Resolution No. 76-22 and adds the Taylor Boulevard corridor. To implement this project, CCTA requires the City to commit a local match of 11.47%, which is approximately $152,810 (increased from $111,000).

Analysis
The City has a total of 44 signals located throughout the community. Many of these existing signal systems lack needed infrastructure, such as modern signal controllers, detection, and communication technology, making it difficult to implement traffic signal synchronization and coordination between traffic signals along arterials. Most corridors do not currently include signal control and prioritization technologies to promote transit usage to reduce delay and travel times for transit vehicles, nor to reduce response time for emergency vehicles.

Staff has been strategically working to upgrade the legacy signal systems along the City’s major corridors to improve safety and circulation, and to prepare them for next generation communication and connectivity. Implementation of this Smart Signals Project by CCTA is in line with the signal upgrade approach that staff has been engaged in and is expected to result in operational and safety improvements for all modes of transportation along these project corridors.

The Countywide Smart Signals Project in Pleasant Hill will upgrade 20 signals located along three key arterial corridors:
• Contra Costa Boulevard - 12
• Taylor Boulevard - 5
• Monument Boulevard – 3
The upgraded traffic signals will benefit all roadway users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders by improving their safety and improving travel times, while better managing changes in traffic patterns due to incidents on adjacent roadways. To implement this project, CCTA requires that the City enter into an agreement with CCTA committing the required local match funds.

More details can be found in Attachment 3: Funding Agreement. The project schedule is still to be determined in coordination with other City projects.

10.4 Packet Pg. 325

FISCAL IMPACT
City Council’s action on this item will secure $1,332,258 of CCTA funding for the Smart Signals Project in Pleasant Hill led by CCTA. Local match funds that will be required to complete this project are $152,810, which represents 11.47% of the total cost. This project is not currently identified in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The matching funds would come from the City’s Measure K Pedestrian and Bicycle Program for FY 2024/25, and the Project would be added to the upcoming FY 2024/25 CIP project list.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends adopting the Resolution to authorize the City Manager to execute a funding agreement committing a local match of $152,810 from the FY 2024/25 Measure K Pedestrian and Bicycle Program allocation for the Countywide Smart Signals Project in Pleasant Hill sponsored by Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA).

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
If the City Council chooses not to adopt the proposed resolution, the City will not receive CCTA funding for this project. Staff could seek other potential funding sources, or the City could choose not to construct the project.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Resolution
Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement
Resolution No. 76-22, authorizing pursuit of grant funding and partnership with CCTA Countywide Smart Signals Brochure
Prepared by: Ryan McClain, Transportation Manager
Reviewed by: Ananthan Kanagasundaram, City Engineer
Approved by: Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager

10.4 Packet Pg. 326
RESOLUTION NO. -24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FUNDING AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF

PLEASANT HILL FOR COST-SHARING COMMITMENTS TO DESIGN AND

CONSTRUCT THE CCTA COUNTYWIDE SMART SIGNALS PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is the project sponsor and designated lead agency for implementing the Countywide Smart Signals Project (Project) within Contra Costa County; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill adopted Resolution No. 76-22 authorizing the City Engineer to submit a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for the allocation of 2022 One Bay Area Grant – Cycle 3 (OBAG-3) grant funding and authorizing the City to partner with CCTA on a countywide multi-agency grant proposal; and WHEREAS, CCTA will receive $1,179,478 in OBAG-3 grant funding from MTC for Pleasant Hill’s portion of the CCTA Countywide Smart Signals project; and WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill is required to provide project matching funds of $152,810 (minimum 11.47% matching contribution to the grant funds); and WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill and CCTA mutually desire to cooperate in completing the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Funding Agreement (Exhibit 1) specifies the funding terms and conditions under which the project will be implemented.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill authorizes the City Manager to execute the Project Funding Agreement with Contra Costa Transportation Authority for Pleasant Hill’s portion of the Countywide Smart Signals Project. [Signatures on Following Page]

10.4.a
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill authorizes matching funds of $152,810 from Measure K Pedestrian and Bicycle Program funds from Fisal Year 2024/2025.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 26th of February, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
MATTHEW RINN, Mayor
ATTEST:

LYONE P. CONNER, City Clerk

10.4.a
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Proposed Resolution (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) FUNDING AGREEMENT No. 649
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

Page 1 of 6 ends

FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. 649

BETWEEN

THE CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND

THE CITY OF PLESANT HILL

FOR COST SHARING COMMITMENTS TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT THE

COUNTYWIDE SMART SIGNALS PROJECT
This Agreement is made and entered into on June 21, 2023 by the City of Pleasant Hill hereinafter referred to as ("CITY") and the CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY hereinafter referred to as ("AUTHORITY"). CITY and AUTHORITY are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” and each individually as a “Party.”

RECITALS

1. AUTHORITY is the project sponsor and designated lead agency for implementing the Countywide Smart Signals Project within Contra Costa County, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT”, which is a program to install signal system and intelligent transportation system (ITS) equipment upgrades to key identified intersections within Contra Costa County cities with the objective to coordinate and synchronize the timing of the signals.

2. AUTHORITY is the recipient of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC’s) One Bay Area Cycle 3 (OBAG 3) funds for design, construction, and deployment of the PROJECT.

3. CITY and AUTHORITY have identified 20 intersections to recommend for signal system and intelligent transportation system (ITS) equipment upgrades for inclusion in the PROJECT estimated at $1,332,258 (See Exhibit A)

4. CITY agrees to provide AUTHORITY with the minimum 11.47% local matching funds to the OBAG 3 funds in the amount of $152,810 in Fiscal Year 2023-24 to pay for the design and installation of upgraded equipment located within CITY’s right-of-way and cost of construction as part of the PROJECT.

5. CITY and AUTHORITY agree that the final matching funds requirements may be adjusted accordingly based on the final actual design and construction costs incurred and will be reconciled at the completion of the PROJECT as defined in paragraph 6 below.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the AUTHORITY and CITY do hereby agree as follows:

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) FUNDING AGREEMENT No. 649
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

Page 2 of 6 ends

SECTION I
CITY AGREES:

1. To provide AUTHORITY matching funds for upgrading equipment and construction cost for the City’s portion of the PROJECT in an amount of $152,810, which represents 11.47% of the OBAG3 funds of $1,332,258, no later than 30 days from receiving an invoice from AUTHORITY.

2. To work collaboratively with AUTHORITY to implement the PROJECT.

SECTION II
AUTHORITY AGREES:

1. To lead the development process including planning, design, construction, and deployment of the PROJECT, as described in Exhibit A and the Operations and Maintenance Agreement to be negotiated by the CITY and AUTHORITY following execution of this Agreement.

2. To submit an invoice to CITY for an amount of $152,810 prior to December 31, 2023.

3. To work collaboratively with CITY to implement the PROJECT.

SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:

1. (a) That the cost to complete PROJECT is only an estimate and may require adjustments depending on the final cost. At the completion of the PROJECT, and if AUTHORITY determines that the match amount provided by CITY is exceeded, it will notify and seek approval of CITY to provide additional matching funds. Completion of the Project is defined as when AUTHORITY accepts and certifies that all phases of the PROJECT construction–including but not limited to installation, deployment, and activation of equipment–are completed. (b) If AUTHORITY determines that the match amount provided by CITY exceeded the amount needed to complete the PROJECT then AUTHORITY will refund CITY the balance of the original match amount provided by CITY and indicated in paragraph 1 of Section I.

2. Term: This Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2028, or at the completion of the PROJECT, whichever occurs first, or until discharged as provided in Paragraph 3 below or as a result of paragraph 12 below.

3. Discharge: This Agreement shall be subject to discharge as follows:
a. Either Party may terminate this Agreement at any time until construction of the

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) FUNDING AGREEMENT No. 649
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

Page 3 of 6 ends

PROJECT begins, other than for breach. Either Party may terminate by giving written notice of termination to the other Party which shall specify both the cause and the effective date of termination.

Notice of termination under this provision shall be given at least ninety (90) days before the effective date of such termination. Once construction of the PROJECT begins, neither party may terminate this Agreement unless there is a breach as addressed in paragraph 3(b) below. b. This Agreement may be canceled by a Party for breach of any obligation, covenant, or condition hereof by the other Party, upon notice to the breaching Party. With respect to any breach which is reasonably capable of being cured, the breaching Party shall have thirty (30) days from the date of the notice to initiate steps to cure. If the breaching party diligently pursues cure, such party shall be allowed a reasonable time to cure, not to exceed sixty (60) days from the date of the initial notice, unless a further extension is granted by the non-breaching Party. On cancellation, the nonbreaching party retains the same rights as a Party exercising its right to terminate under the provisions of paragraph 3(a), except that the canceling Party also retains any remedy for breach of the whole contract or any unperformed balance.
c. By mutual consent of both PARTIES, this Agreement may be terminated at any time. d. In the event of termination, AUTHORITY shall reimburse CITY for overpayment by CITY based on the difference between actual cost share and estimated cost share. In no event shall the maximum expenditure allowed under this Agreement, as it may be adjusted by a written amendment signed by both parties, be exceeded.

4. Indemnity: It is mutually understood and agreed, relative to the reciprocal indemnification of AUTHORITY and CITY:
a. That neither AUTHORITY, nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for, and CITY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless AUTHORITY against, any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction by CITY under the Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify and hold the AUTHORITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury as defined by Government Code Section 810.8 occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under this Agreement or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement.
b. That neither CITY, nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for, and AUTHORITY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless CITY against any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by AUTHORITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction by AUTHORITY under the Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, AUTHORITY shall fully indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury as defined by Government Code Section 810.8 occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by AUTHORITY under this Agreement or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to AUTHORITY under this Agreement.

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) FUNDING AGREEMENT No. 649
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

Page 4 of 6 ends

5. Notices: Any notice which may be required under this Agreement shall be in writing, shall be effective when received, and shall be given by personal service, or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses set forth below, or to such addresses which may be specified in writing to the parties hereto.

Ethan Bindernagel
City Manager
City of Pleasant Hill
100 Gregory Lane
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Timothy Haile
Executive Director
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
2999 Oak Road, Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94597

6. Additional Acts and Documents: Each Party agrees to do all such things and take all such actions, and to make, execute and deliver such other documents and instruments, as shall be reasonably requested to carry out the provisions, intent and purpose of this Agreement.

7. Integration: This Agreement represents the entire Agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No representations, warranties, inducements or oral agreements have been made by any of the Parties except as expressly set forth herein, or in other contemporaneous written agreements.

8. Amendment: This Agreement may not be changed, modified or rescinded except in writing, signed by all Parties hereto, and any attempt at oral modification of this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.

9. Independent Agency: AUTHORITY renders its services under this Agreement as an independent agency. None of the AUTHORITY’s agents or employees shall be agents or employees of the CITY.

10. Assignment: This Agreement may not be assigned, transferred, hypothecated, or pledged by any Party without the express written consent of the other Party.

11. Binding on Successors, etc.: This Agreement shall be binding upon the successor(s), assignee(s) or transferee(s) of the AUTHORITY or CITY as the case may be. This provision shall not be construed as an authorization to assign, transfer, hypothecate or pledge this Agreement other than as provided above.

12. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be determined to be unenforceable, invalid, or beyond the authority of either Party to enter into or carry out, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement which shall continue in full force and effect; provided that, the remainder of this Agreement can, absent the excised portion, be reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the Parties.

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) FUNDING AGREEMENT No. 649
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

Page 5 of 6 ends

13. Limitation: All obligations of AUTHORITY under the terms of this Agreement are expressly subject to the AUTHORITY's continued authorization to collect and expend the sales tax proceeds provided by MEASURE C and MEASURE J. If for any reason the AUTHORITY's right to collect or expend such sales tax proceeds is terminated or suspended in whole or part, the AUTHORITY shall promptly notify CITY, and the PARTIES shall consult on a course of action to determine how to accomplish the PROJECT or if this Agreement should be terminated. If, after sixty (60) working days of the termination or suspension of sales tax proceeds authority, a course of action is not agreed upon by the PARTIES, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated by mutual or joint consent; provided, that any obligation to fund from the date of the notice shall be expressly limited by and subject to (i) the lawful ability of the AUTHORITY to expend sales tax proceeds for the purposes of the Agreement; and (ii) the availability, taking into consideration all the obligations of the AUTHORITY under all outstanding contracts, agreements to other obligations of the AUTHORITY, of funds for such purposes.

14. No Third Party Beneficiaries: This Agreement is not for the benefit of any person or entity other than the parties.

15. Dispute Resolution: The Parties shall work together in the spirit of good faith and cooperation to successfully implement this Agreement. Should a substantive disagreement arise between the Parties, the disagreement shall immediately be raised between the Parties. Prior to initiating any legal action, the Parties agree to meet in good faith to attempt to resolve any dispute, including but limited to meetings between executive management and participating in mediation.

The Parties shall jointly select and engage the effort of a mediator to help resolve the dispute. The Parties shall equally share the costs of the mediator. If the issue is still unresolved, either Party may bring a legal action seeking resolution of the disagreement. However, any and all legal actions may only be brought if the preceding dispute resolution process has been satisfied.

16. Venue: This Agreement and all work performed thereunder shall be interpreted under and pursuant to the laws of the State of California. The Parties agree that the jurisdiction and venue of any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be the Superior Court of Contra Costa County.

17. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in any number of original counterpart signature pages, and each counterpart signature page shall be attached to and incorporated into this original Agreement.

Signatures on the following page.

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) FUNDING AGREEMENT No. 649
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

Page 6 of 6 ends

CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL AUTHORITY
By: By:

Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager Newell Arnerich, Chair
ATTEST:

By: By:

Lyone P. Conner, City Clerk Tarienne Grover, Clerk of the Board APPROVED as to form:

By: By:

Janet E. Coleson, City Attorney Fennemore Wendel, Legal Counsel

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) 1 FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. 649
between
The Contra Costa Transportation Authority
and
The City of Pleasant Hill

EXHIBIT A

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

BACKGROUND
The Smart Signals project in Contra Costa County is a CCTA led countywide project to upgrade traffic signal system and communication systems throughout its 19 cities and unincorporated communities.

Contra Costa County is home to 19 cities/towns and the County, which includes numerous unincorporated communities. There are approximately 1400 traffic signals within the County, Caltrans-owned and various city-owned. Most of these traffic signals are located either along major arterials, including State Routes, identified as Routes of Regional Significance (RSS) or other major and minor arterials in the cities/towns.

The project will develop, manage, and implement Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) initiatives such as upgrading the existing legacy systems, providing interconnectivity throughout Contra Costa County signal systems and enhance the sharing of real-time information between agencies and the public.

The existing traffic signal systems in most jurisdictions located within Contra Costa County are legacy systems and are outdated or antiquated compared to newer traffic signal systems. These signal systems currently lack the communication infrastructure such as fiber and cellular/wireless-based communication, which makes it difficult to implement traffic signal synchronization and coordination between traffic signals along an arterial. Most corridors do not currently include Signal Control and Prioritization (SCP) technologies to promote transit usage to reduce delay and travel times for transit vehicles and reduce response time for emergency vehicles.

These deficiencies result in severe traffic congestion within the cities/towns and may result in spillover onto freeways and cause a chain reaction of congestion along local arterials. The current system contributes to overall commuter travel times and delays, increases greenhouse gas emissions and fuel consumption, as well as incidents and collisions. These deficiencies were documented following extensive discussions with the cities and towns regarding traffic signal operation within the Contra Costa County.

CCTA and the project Stakeholders have initially identified these deficiencies, which are translated as the following project goals: 1) Improve safety and minimize crashes, injuries, and fatalities between motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians; 2) Optimize mobility along major corridors and RRS; and 3) Advance to Smart City and Internet of Things (IOT) solutions.

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) 2 PROJECT ELEMENTS
The Smart Signals project will develop, manage, and implement ITS initiatives that improve the safety and efficiency of multimodal mobility, maximize highway and arterial system throughput, and improve operational efficiency, safety, and reduce environmental impact throughout the county. By upgrading the existing legacy systems and providing interconnectivity throughout Contra Costa County signal systems, the county’s traffic signal systems can be prepared for future emerging technologies including connected and/or autonomous vehicles, big data, integrated corridor management (ICM), enable implementation of incident management strategies and Smart Cities initiatives. This solution can enhance the sharing of real-time information between agencies and the public using existing and next generation ITS technologies.

The upgraded traffic signal systems and signal interconnect will help smooth traffic flow and ease recurring traffic congestion by expanding mode choice options and reducing travel time on local streets and roads. Upgraded traffic signals will benefit pedestrians and transit commuters by reducing wait times at intersections, improving total travel time for all modes while making transit and pedestrian more viable transportation options. The Smart Signal systems would also improve the safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, vulnerable road users, and people with disabilities by deployment of detection systems.

To accomplish these goals, CCTA is applying a Smart Signal approach that will include the implementation of ITS equipment including upgraded traffic signal controllers and cabinets, upgraded Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) for each agency to provide remote command and control from a centralized Traffic Management Center (TMC) or Traffic Operations Center (TOC) location, Closed-circuit Television (CCTV) cameras, SCP for transit and emergency vehicles, and vehicle detection systems deployed on predefined designated arterials and state routes.

These improvements will provide local cities and Caltrans day-to-day county-wide traffic management capabilities in addressing recurrent traffic congestion as well as provide CCTA capabilities for managing the system during non-recurring traffic congestion caused by diverted traffic due to major incidents on the freeway or during any evacuation efforts.

The PROJECT’s key features and benefits include but are not limited to some of the following:
• Providing infrastructure for a countywide traffic management system • Upgrading local signal controllers and signal system hardware, software, and firmware • Deploying bicycle and pedestrian detection software for vulnerable road user protection • Providing SCP, including Transit Signal Priority (TSP) and Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) capabilities
• Enabling local event management signal timing options • Taking a proactive approach to safety by identifying “near miss” situations for analysis • Enabling cities and CCTA to proactively manage day-to-day traffic • Enabling cities to proactively manage traffic on local streets that has diverted off the freeway due to a major freeway incident
• Identifying alternative routes with timing optimized for incident management • Allowing shared control and operation, improving cross jurisdictional traffic management • Allowing cities/CCTA access to monitor all CCTV cameras and traffic signals for the purpose of optimizing day-to-day operations

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) 3 Deployment of the Smart Signals Project is expected to result in operational and safety improvements for all modes of transportation, such as:
• Decrease in travel time,
• Decrease in total delay,
• Reduction in number of stops
• Reduction in secondary accidents
• Decrease in fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions • Promotion of transit ridership
• Reduction of response time for emergency vehicles
When operating together, these enhancements increase safety and reliability, and support environmental sustainability, economic development, and equitable access for all travelers.

CITY OF PLEASANT HILL ELEMENTS
The signals located at the following intersection are included in the Project and are proposed to receive Smart Signal upgrades. (See Table 1)
Table 1: City of Pleasant Hill PROJECT Intersections

LIST OF INTERSECTIONS
Signal No. Primary Street Secondary Street
1 Contra Costa Blvd Golf Club Rd
2 Contra Costa Blvd Viking Dr
3 Contra Costa Blvd Sunvalley Blvd
4 Contra Costa Blvd Ellinwood Dr
5 Contra Costa Blvd Beth Dr
6 Contra Costa Blvd Vivian Dr
7 Contra Costa Blvd Woodsworth Ln
8 Contra Costa Blvd Crescent Dr
9 Contra Costa Blvd Monument Blvd
10 Contra Costa Blvd Boyd Rd
11 Contra Costa Blvd Astrid Dr
12 North Main Street Pleasant Valley Dr
13 Crescent Plaza Crescent Dr
14 Monument Blvd Buskirk Ave
15 Buskirk Ave Lamkin Lane
16 Taylor Blvd Grayson Rd
17 Taylor Blvd Apollo Way
18 Taylor Blvd Morello Ave
19 Taylor Blvd Lucille Ln/Norse Dr
20 Taylor Blvd Ruth Dr

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) 4 The recommended upgrades for signals located in Pleasant Hill include:
• Signal controller upgrade
• Video/Radar detection or equivalent
• Ethernet Over Copper (EOC) for communication between the signals that is fiber ready • Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) cameras, as needed
• An Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)
• Traffic signal synchronization – Signal timing and flush plans • Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP)
• Transit Signal Priority (TSP), and
• Video Analytics, as needed
Based on preliminary estimates, the upgraded equipment, including cost of construction, is shown below. The City is responsible to provide the minimum 11.47% match. • Total Number of Signals – 20
• Total Funding – $1,332,258
• Local match required – $152,810 (11.47%)

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) 29222494.1/060323.0001

10.4.b
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Funding Agreement (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) RESOLUTION NO.76-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SUBMIT A REQUEST TO THE

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
FOR THE ALLOCATION OF 2022 ONE BAY AREA GRANT FUNDS AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO PARTNER WITH CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY ON A COUNTYWIDE MULTI-AGENCY GRANT PROPOSAL
UNDER THE 2022 ONE BAY AREA GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the One Bay Area Grant guides how Metropolitan Transportation Commission distributes federal transportation funds from the Federal Highway Administration to projects and programs that improve safety, spur economic development, and help the Bay Area meet climate change and emission goals; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay Area pursuant to Government Code Section 66500 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, MTC is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area region; and
WHEREAS, MTC is the designated recipient for federal funding administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) assigned to MTC for the programming and administration of One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) Cycle 3 funds; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is leading an effort to prepare a Countywide Smart Signals multi-agency grant proposal. CCTA invited the City of Pleasant Hill to partner with CCTA, and to support and collaborate with CCTA. CCTA is the sponsoring and leading local agency; and
WHEREAS, within the Pleasant Hill city limits, the grant proposal study area includes a total of 15 city-owned traffic signals on two major street corridors. The project will upgrade the traffic signal systems and communication technologies on these corridors, and will benefit the City of Pleasant Hill, as well as Contra Costa County and Caltrans; and WHEREAS, within the Pleasant Hill city limits, the Countywide Smart Signals Project estimated cost is $970,000. The required local match fund is about $111,000 which represents

11.47% of the project cost. On behalf of Pleasant Hill, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority will request OBAG funds of $859,000, which represents 88.53% of the project cost; and WHEREAS, as a participating local agency, the City of Pleasant Hill is eligible to request the OBAG funds to fund improvements in Pleasant Hill; and

10.4.c
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Resolution No. 76-22 (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) WHEREAS, if awarded an OBAG grant, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority will execute all project administration, contracting, financing, accounting, and implementation. The City of Pleasant Hill will be eligible for reimbursement on project expenses such as consultant fee, staff time, and construction inspection time incurred less the portion of local match of up to $111,000.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that, the City of Pleasant Hill declares it is eligible to request an allocation of 2022 One Bay Area Grant funds; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is authorized to submit a request for an allocation of 2022 One Bay Area Grant funds; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that the City is authorized to partner with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority on a multi-agency-agency grant proposal under the 2022 One Bay Area Grant Program.

The Contra Costa Transportation Authority is the sponsoring and leading local agency; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to US Department of Transportation.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 12th of September, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Carlson, Noack, Rinn, Harris
NOES: None
ABSENT: Flaherty
ABSTAIN: None
___________________________________
MICHAEL G. HARRIS, OD, Mayor
ATTEST:

DANIELLE K. HABR, City Clerk

10.4.c
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Resolution No. 76-22 (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) Countywide
Smart Signals

ABOUT THIS PROJECT
Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA)
is leading a Smart Signals Project to upgrade traffic
signals at over 300 intersections throughout the
19 cities/towns and unincorporated communities
within Contra Costa County. This work is focused
along major arterials that have been designated
as “Routes of Regional Significance.”
Right Time For An Upgrade
Existing traffic signals within Contra Costa are not
connected to each other (like with fiber or ethernet),
preventing synchronization and coordination between
signals. Additionally, most modern signal systems need
Signal Control and Prioritization (SCP) technology that can help transit vehicles and alternative modes such as bikes and shuttles, move through intersections safely
and efficiently.

By incorporating modern elements into the County’s
signal systems, CCTA will optimize traffic flow on its
arterials, reduce congestion, and hopefully eliminate
spillover of congestion onto the freeways. Efforts
performed with this project will also enable CCTA to
enhance safety for all modes, monitor traffic conditions in real-time, improve incident management and response
times, and prepare Contra Costa for other emerging
transportation technologies.

A roadway that connects two or more
subareas of Contra Costa, crosses County
boundaries, carries significant through
traffic, and/or provides access to a
regional highway or transit facility.

What is a Route of
Regional Significance?
Benefits of Smart Signals
Safer Roads: Imagine better emergency
response times, easier management of
incidents by first responders and law
enforcement, and reduction of secondary
incidents due to video analytics that can
identify near-miss situations.

Smoother Travel: Synchronized,
responsive signals can reduce idling at
red lights, improve speed management,
decrease travel delays, reduce greenhouse
gas emissions, and increase transit reliability.

Better Traffic Management: Cities and
Caltrans will have access to real-time data
that allows optimization of traffic during
incidents, evacuations, or other major
events. Cities will be able to prioritize transit
and emergency vehicles as needed.

November 2023 10.4.d
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: CCTA SmartSignals Brochure (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals) Schedule
Stakeholders
Collaborators
CCTA is working closely with several agencies
to make this project a success. We are thankful
for the teamwork offered by the following:

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (County
Connection), Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority
(Tri Delta Transit), Western Contra Costa County
Transit (WestCAT), Alameda-Contra Costa Transit
District (AC Transit), Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART),
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans),
and Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC).

FOR MORE INFORMATION

ABOUT THIS PROJECT
John Hoang
Director, Planning at CCTA
925.256.4729
[email protected]

KEY FEATURES

1. Traffic Signal
Synchronization

2. Video/Radar Vehicle
Detection

3. Ethernet Communication

4. Pan-Tilt-Zoom Cameras

5. Emergency Vehicle
Preemption

6. Transit Signal Priority

7. Video Analytics and Closed
Circuit Television Cameras

8. Pedestrian and Bicycle
Detection
7 8
5 6
1 2
3 4
Environmental
Studies
(PAED)
Design &
Engineering
(PS&E)
Planning & Construction
Conceptual
Design
JULY
2022
MARCH
2023
APRIL
2024

SEPTEMBER
2025
Antioch
Brentwood
Clayton
Concord
Danville
El Cerrito
Hercules
Lafayette
Martinez
Moraga
Oakley
Orinda
Pinole
Pittsburg
Pleasant Hill
Richmond
San Pablo
San Ramon
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa County
Measure J
Local Match
OBAG 3*
LPP-F**
TOTAL
$30.8 million
*One Bay Area Grant 3 (OBAG 3): Federal
funding provided by Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC).
**Local Partnership Program – Formulaic
(LPP-F): State funding provided by California
Transportation Commission (CTC).

FUNDING SOURCES

10.4.d
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: CCTA SmartSignals Brochure (Funding Agreement for CCTA Countywide Smart Signals)

Pleasant Hill City CouncilFebruary 26, 2024

Pleasant Hill City Council
February 26, 2024