Pleasant Hill City Council
June 1, 2026

City of Pleasant Hill
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
Monday, June 01, 2026
REGULAR MEETING - 07:00 PM
Watch on YouTube at www.phillca.gov/councilmeeting
The public meeting of the City Council will be held in person at City Hall 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523.

Telephone (925) 671-5267
A Zoom link is provided herewith as a courtesy, but members of the public are advised that they will only have the option to participate via teleconference using the Zoom platform in the event that a member of the legislative body is approved to attend remotely pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 2449. Meeting link: www.zoom.us; Meeting ID: 899 8701 7894 Passcode: 231261

MAYOR ZAC SHESS
VICE MAYOR & DISTRICT 2 COUNCILMEMBER ANDREI OBOLENSKIY

COUNCILMEMBER AT LARGE SUE NOACK
DIST. 1 COUNCILMEMBER BELLE LA
DIST. 5 COUNCILMEMBER AMANDA SZAKATS
Options for observing the meeting and participating in public comments are provided below.

Public Communication. The public is welcome to address the City Council on items on the Consent Calendar or other items not listed on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction during the general Public Comment period.

There is an opportunity for the public to comment on other agenda items at the time they are discussed. Comments are generally limited to two minutes.

Public Participation Options
1) Watch the Meeting via Youtube Livestream at www.phillca.gov/councilmeeting. 2) Submit Written Comments by 4 pm the Day of the Meeting to [email protected] (comments received by the deadline will be provided to the City Council before the meeting). Please specify that the correspondence is for public comment at the Council meeting.
3) Make Public Comment During the Meeting
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 1 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 When the Mayor invites public comment (or public comments on specific agenda items), members of the public may attend the meeting in person and may speak on any matter within the City Council's jurisdiction. Please fill out a speaker's card, available at the entry to the Council Chambers, and turn it in to the City Clerk.

If, due to a disability, a reasonable accommodation is needed to participate in this meeting, please refer to the Providing Accessible Communication to the Public Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and AB 2449 document online at www.phillca.gov/accessiblecommunications and contact the ADA Coordinator 48 hours in advance of the meeting at (925) 671-5267 or via California Relay at 711.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available to the public in the City’s Public Records Portal at https://cityarchive.phillca.gov/WebLink/ (click on City Council Agenda Packets) or by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 925-671-5267.

City Council Meeting Recordings and Broadcasts
Recorded City Council meetings are broadcast on Comcast Channel 24, Wave Channel 1029, and AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 on the Wednesday following the meeting. Video recordings are generally available within 48 hours of the meeting, and may be viewed on the City’s website at www.phillca.gov/MeetingVideos and selecting “City Council” from the meeting groups.

Agendas are Available for Review on the City Hall official noticing bulletin board (100 Gregory Lane), at the Pleasant Hill Police Department (330 Civic Drive), the Pleasant Hill Senior Center (233 Gregory Lane), and on the City’s website at www.phillca.gov/agendas. Agenda packets will be available to the public on the City’s website at the same time as they are made available to the City Council.

CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CLOSED SESSION REPORT

PRESENTATIONS
Proclamation Designating the Month of June 2026 as Pride Month in the City of Pleasant Hill
CITY MANAGERS COMMENTS
(Brief updates on pending City business without discussion by the City Council.) COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 5.1

6. 7.

City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 2 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Reports from Councilmembers on Meetings or Conferences Attended at City Expense
Announcements from Councilmembers
PUBLIC COMMENT
The public is welcome at this time to address the City Council on items on the Consent Calendar or other items not listed on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction. There is an opportunity for the public to comment on other agenda items at the time they are discussed. Comments are limited to two minutes per speaker. To provide public comments, please see the Public Participation Options above.

CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under “Consent Calendar” are considered by the Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate Council discussion of these items unless requested by a Councilmember prior to the time Council votes on the motion to adopt.

Approve Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting of May 18, 2026 Page 5 Approve Checks Dated: May 15, 2026; May 22, 2026 Page 11 Adopt Ordinance NO.__ Amending Chapter 5.55, Traffic Mitigation Fee, of the City of Pleasant Hill Municipal Code with an Updated Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study

Accept Update on Contra Costa Transportation Authority and TRANSPAC Page 36 Adopt Resolution No. -26 Authorizing a Request to the California Transportation Commission and Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 8 Project Funding for the Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard Active Transportation Project

ACTION CALENDAR
Adopt Resolution NO. __-26 Approving the Participation of the City of Pleasant Hill in the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance System Joint Powers Authority

Adopt Resolution NO.__-26 Authorizing Updated Traffic Impact Fees and Directing Staff to Implement a Three-year Phased Increase.

Adopt Resolution NO. __-26 approving intention to levy and collect assessments and to provide for Public Hearing and Notice in AD 20 for

7.1 7.2

8. 9.

9.1 9.2

9.3 9.4

9.5 10.

10.1 10.2

10.3 City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 3 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 FY2026-2027
Adopt Resolution NO.__-26 Approving Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments and to provide for Public Hearing and notice in Assessment District No. 22 for FY 2026-2027

Adopt Resolution NO.__-26 Calling for a General Municipal Election to be Held on November 3, 2026, for the Election of Certain Officers, Requesting the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to Consolidate the General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election to be Conducted on that Same Date, and Setting Rules and Deadlines for Candidate's Statements

ADJOURNMENT
Next City Council Meeting: June 15, 2026

10.4 10.5

11. City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 4 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 1, 2026

100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3323 – (925) 671-5270 www.pleasanthillca.org
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
SUBJECT: Approve Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting of May 18, 2026 RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the Minutes
ATTACHMENT(S): May 18, 2026 – Tentative Minutes
Prepared by: Lyone Conner, City Clerk

Item 9.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 5 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
May 18, 2026
City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 May 18, 2026

1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Shess called a Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:00 PM, in the Council Chambers, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA, and 806 15th Street NW. Washington, DC 20005, complete proceedings of which were electronically recorded. The meeting agenda was posted on the City Hall outdoor bulletin board at 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA on May 14, 2026, by City Clerk Lyone Conner.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Shess invited the Council and Public to join him in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.

3. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Zac Shess Mayor Present
Andrei Obolenskiy Vice Mayor Present
Belle La District 1 Councilmember Present
Sue Noack District 2 Councilmember Present - Remote
Amanda Szakats District 5 Councilmember Present

4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Mayor Shess reported that there was a closed session and nothing to report.

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 Award of Appreciation to Dave Mascaro for Service on the Planning Commission from 2002 to 2026
Mayor Shess shared remarks regarding Dave Mascaro and his length of service on the Planning Commission.

Mr. Mascaro thanked the Council and reflected on the history of service in his family.

5.2 Introduction of Planning Commissioner Will Nelson
Councilmember Szakats, who serves as Chair of the Interview and Nominating Committee, introduced Commissioner Will Nelson who was appointed to the Planning Commission.

Commissioner Nelson referenced his experience and expressed appreciation for the appointment.

5.3 Pleasant Hill Police Department Annual Report
Police Chief Scott Vermillion provide a report on the staffing, achievements, and updates for the Police Department. He also responded to questions from Council.

Item 9.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 6 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 May 18, 2026

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager, reported that:
• The Safety Action Plan Workshop will be held on May 19, 2026. • The Sunset by the Lake Summer Concert Series begins on May 24, 2026 • A Memorial Day Ceremony will be held on May 25, 2026
• Information regarding City events and activities are available on the City’s social media channels, via the Bi-weekly e-Newsletter, the bi-monthly Outlook Newsletter, and the City’s website.
• City Clerk Lyone Conner was recognized as the 2025 Oliver Holmes award recipient

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS

7.1 Reports from Councilmembers on Meetings or Conferences Attended at City Expense
Mayor Shess reported the Council’s attendance at the East Bay Division Meeting in Orinda on May 7, 2026.

Councilmember Noack announced that additional Board members are needed.

7.2 Announcements from Councilmembers
All Councilmembers reported their attendance at the Art, Wine, and Music Festival.

Councilmember Noack expressed regrets for attending remotely; she was in Washington D.C. representing MTC.

Councilmember Noack announced her attendance at the Regional Transportation Planning Committee meeting, the Mayors Conference, and the Farmers’ Market.

Councilmember La reported her attendance at a fireside chat with California State Treasurer Fiona Ma and Chamber of Commerce Chair Alex Khodadad and the Farmers’ Market.

Councilmember Szakats announced that she will be hosting a coffee chat with Supervisor Ken Carlson on May 29, 2026 and the Farmers Market booth on May 30, 2026 with representatives from Growing Healthy Kids. She also invited the public to support Martinez USW Local 5 during their rally on Mondays.

Councilmember Szakats reported her attendance at the Twin View Home Hardening Party and the Pleasant Hill Community Service Awards Ceremony.

Vice Mayor Obolenskiy reported his attendance at the 2026 Economic Outlook and Membership meeting in San Ramon and the Visit Pleasant Hill Wine Week Kickoff.

Item 9.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 7 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 May 18, 2026
Vice Mayor Obolenskiy announced that he will host a town hall with Contra Costa Community College District employee Jennifer Ortega. He also expressed congratulations to all of the local high school graduates.

Mayor Shess reported his attendance at the Art, Wine, and Music Activation at the Hyatt House and at the fireside chat with Fiona Ma.

8. PUBLIC COMMENT
No members of the public provided a comment.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion (La/Szakats) to Approve consent items 9.1 – 9.5, carried unanimously as follows:

AYES: La, Noack, Szakats, Obolenskiy, Shess

9.1 Approve Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting of May 4, 2026

9.2 Approve Checks Dated: May 01, 2026; May 08, 2026

9.3 Approve Appointment Recommendations to the Education Commission, Contra Costa County Library Commission, County Connection Advisory Committee, Architectural Review Commission, Concord/Pleasant Hill Health Care District Grant Committee.

9.4 Adopt Ordinance No. Approving a Planned Unit Development PUD Zoning and an associated PUD Concept Plan (ENT-2024-0032) for the Habitat for Humanity Four-Unit Affordable Single-Family Home Development, including an Amendment to Planned Unit Development PUD-347
CEQA: Categorically Exempt (Class 3 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures)

9.5 Accept the March 31, 2026, Treasurer’s Report and the quarterly investment transactions from Chandler Asset Management

10. ACTION CALENDAR

10.1 Public Hearing on Vacancy Report in Compliance with Assembly Bill 2561 and Government Code Section 3502.3
Ericka Mitchell, Chief Human Resources Officer provided a report on the data of vacant City positions .

Mayor Shess opened public comment. No members commented.

Item 9.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 8 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 May 18, 2026
Mayor Shess closed public comment and invited additional discussion from Council.

Council received the report and no vote was necessary.

10.2 Adopt Resolution -26 Accepting Bid and Awarding a Construction Contract for the Shelly Drive and Ruth Drive Storm Drain Improvement Project 02-25 to FJ and I Engineering
Danny Urrutia, Assistant Engineer, provided a report on the project location, improvements needed, and contract process.

Mayor Shess opened public comment. No members commented.

Mayor Shess closed public comment and invited additional discussion from Council.

Motion (Obolenskiy/Noack) to Approve item 10.2, carried unanimously as follows:

AYES: La, Noack, Szakats, Obolenskiy, Shess

10.3 Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study
Laetitia Porta, Senior Civil Engineer, provided a report on the fee calculation variations and guidelines related to the resolution and ordinance for the Traffic Imipact Fee Nexus Study and responded to questions from Council.

10.3.a Adopt Resolution No. -26 Adopting the Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study and Fee Calculation Guidelines
Motion (La/Obolenskiy) to Approve item 10.3.a, carried unanimously as follows:

AYES: La, Noack, Szakats, Obolenskiy, Shess

10.3.b Introduce Ordinance No. for the Revised Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance Motion (Szakats/La) to Approve item 10.3.b, carried unanimously as follows:

AYES: La, Noack, Szakats, Obolenskiy, Shess

10.4 Preliminary General Fund Biennial Budget for Fiscal Years 2026-2026 and 2027- 2028
Erick Cheung, Chief Financial Officer, provided a report on the status of the biennial budget and responded to questions from Council.

Item 9.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 9 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 May 18, 2026

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Shess adjourned the meeting at 9:44 p.m. The next Regular City Council meeting will be held on Monday, June 1, 2026, beginning at 7:00 p.m.
______________________________
LYONE P. CONNER, CITY CLERK
Item 9.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 10 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 1, 2026
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
SUBJECT: Approve Checks Dated: May 15, 2026; May 22, 2026

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Approve the check register.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Check Register
Prepared by: Maria Alfredo, Accounting Technician I
Approved by: Erick Cheung, Chief Financial Officer
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 11 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 5/15/2026 7:51:50 AM Page 1 of 7
Expense Approval Report
Pleasant Hill, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 5/15/2026 - 5/15/2026
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount Vendor: ALS01 - ALSCO UNIFORMS
ALSCO UNIFORMS LSAC2232623 05/15/2026 MATS, TOWELS, LAUNDRY S… 101-2001-0000-660014 350066 05/15/2026 160.78 Vendor ALS01 - ALSCO UNIFORMS Total: 160.78
Vendor: AMA05 - AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.

AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …16YC-CH7D-4PKC 05/15/2026 MIRACS FOR IPHONE 17E CS … 401-1012-0000-660024 350069 05/15/2026 39.22 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …17YN-644Y-7VPC 05/15/2026 PORTABLE SPEAKER MIC SET …401-1012-0000-660024 350067 05/15/2026 64.46 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …1KDC-QQPX-PFDX 05/15/2026 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CH 101-1016-0000-660016 350070 05/15/2026 74.55 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …1TCH-RPLL-936Q 05/15/2026 24 Pack Wood Easels 101-4002-0000-620112 350068 05/15/2026 52.43 Vendor AMA05 - AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Total: 230.66 Vendor: AME03 - AMERINAT
AMERINAT LPM-26-000663 05/15/2026 MONTHLY SVC FEES- APR 20… 225-4027-0000-630040 350071 05/15/2026 1,000.00 Vendor AME03 - AMERINAT Total: 1,000.00
Vendor: APO26 - APOLLO ROOFING COMPANY
APOLLO ROOFING COMPANY 260515 05/15/2026 BL#44875 & 47137 PD TWICE 101-0000-0000-404010 350072 05/15/2026 474.00 APOLLO ROOFING COMPANY 260515 05/15/2026 BL#44875 & 47137 PD TWICE 203-240096 350072 05/15/2026 4.00 Vendor APO26 - APOLLO ROOFING COMPANY Total: 478.00
Vendor: ARR04 - ARROWHEAD 24HR TOWING & RECOVERY
ARROWHEAD 24HR TOWING… 240417 05/15/2026 LOCKSMITH SERVICING 101-2001-0000-650051 350073 05/15/2026 114.50 Vendor ARR04 - ARROWHEAD 24HR TOWING & RECOVERY Total: 114.50 Vendor: AST05 - ASTRO JUMP OF CONTRA COSTA
ASTRO JUMP OF CONTRA CO… 57909875 05/15/2026 BOUN HOUSE FOR THE SUM… 101-4002-0000-700085 350074 05/15/2026 420.00 Vendor AST05 - ASTRO JUMP OF CONTRA COSTA Total: 420.00 Vendor: ATT04 - AT&T
AT&T 25184498 05/15/2026 ANAL PH LN FOR FR ALRM N … 101-1012-0000-670020 350079 05/15/2026 124.16 AT&T 25184505 05/15/2026 ANAL PH LN FOR ENGR FX 92…101-1012-0000-670020 350075 05/15/2026 92.61 AT&T 25186429 05/15/2026 WORK ORDER 5/12/26 101-2001-0000-670020 350076 05/15/2026 31.91 AT&T 25186956 05/15/2026 PRI LINE AT CH FOR VOIP AC… 101-1012-0000-670020 350077 05/15/2026 1,718.69 AT&T 25189813 05/15/2026 SIP TRUNK FOR LIBRARY PH… 101-1012-0000-670020 350078 05/15/2026 466.40 Vendor ATT04 - AT&T Total: 2,433.77
Vendor: BAY08 - BAY AREA NEWS GROUP
BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 1473510 05/15/2026 CLASS ADVER; CCT MAR'26 P… 101-3001-0000-620122 350080 05/15/2026 805.50 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 1473510 05/15/2026 CLASS ADVER; CCT MAR'26 P… 101-4004-0000-620112 350080 05/15/2026 805.50 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 1473510 05/15/2026 CLASS ADVER; CCT MAR'26 P… 231-5065-0000-620131 350080 05/15/2026 947.70 Vendor BAY08 - BAY AREA NEWS GROUP Total: 2,558.70
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 12 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/15/2026 - 5/15/2026 5/15/2026 7:51:50 AM Page 2 of 7
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount Vendor: CHR26 - CHRIS BRYANT
CHRIS BRYANT 260515 05/15/2026 PERFOR BY "GARAGELAND R… 101-240073 350081 05/15/2026 1,200.00 Vendor CHR26 - CHRIS BRYANT Total: 1,200.00
Vendor: SAY26 - CHRISTIAN SAYLOR
CHRISTIAN SAYLOR 260515 05/15/2026 BL#44639 SOLD BUS. 3/1/26 101-0000-0000-404010 350082 05/15/2026 440.80 Vendor SAY26 - CHRISTIAN SAYLOR Total: 440.80
Vendor: COM02 - COMCAST
COMCAST 8155400030053878 5526 05/15/2026 MONTHLY FOR 5/2026 ACCT 101-1012-0000-670010 350084 05/15/2026 127.36 COMCAST ACCT 8155400030008492 55… 05/15/2026 MONTHLY CABLE SVC 101-2001-0000-670010 350083 05/15/2026 313.17 Vendor COM02 - COMCAST Total: 440.53
Vendor: CCP25 - CONTRA COSTA POWERSPORTS
CONTRA COSTA POWERSPO… 47260 05/15/2026 MOTORCYCLE SERVICING 101-2001-0000-650051 350085 05/15/2026 807.22 Vendor CCP25 - CONTRA COSTA POWERSPORTS Total: 807.22
Vendor: CCW01 - CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT
CONTRA COSTA WATER DIST… ACCT 3021467 5/06/26 05/15/2026 DVWS- RAW WTR CHRG ACC… 501-7010-0000-660013 350086 05/15/2026 24,530.72 Vendor CCW01 - CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT Total: 24,530.72 Vendor: COR13 - CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC
CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC 30861505 05/15/2026 RLQUEST MO/ USAGE FEE A… 101-1012-0000-650036 350087 05/15/2026 270.89 Vendor COR13 - CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC Total: 270.89
Vendor: COR25 - CORODATA SHREDDING INC.

CORODATA SHREDDING INC. DN 1575979 05/15/2026 SHRDD SVCS 4/8/26 365 STN… 101-1012-0000-630040 350088 05/15/2026 1,681.25 Vendor COR25 - CORODATA SHREDDING INC. Total: 1,681.25
Vendor: DEL20 - DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SVCS, INC.

DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL …597038551 05/15/2026 CH & PD COPIER LEASE, INCL …101-1012-0000-620052 350089 05/15/2026 1,612.79 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL …597038551 05/15/2026 CH & PD COPIER LEASE, INCL …101-1012-2001-620052 350089 05/15/2026 1,051.25 Vendor DEL20 - DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SVCS, INC. Total: 2,664.04 Vendor: DKS26 - DKS
DKS 26-011-01 05/15/2026 PO/51390 PH PEDES CROSS … 301-5139-6001-630034 350090 05/15/2026 51,290.00 Vendor DKS26 - DKS Total: 51,290.00
Vendor: FJK01 - F.J. KENNEDY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

F.J. KENNEDY AND ASSOCIAT… 26-076 05/15/2026 PO/ 30016 STORMWATER P… 231-3001-0000-630040 350091 05/15/2026 158.05 Vendor FJK01 - F.J. KENNEDY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Total: 158.05 Vendor: FOR06 - FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION
FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION PHPD-2603 05/15/2026 DRUG/ALCOHOL/TOXICOLO… 101-2001-0000-630033 350092 05/15/2026 5,301.00 Vendor FOR06 - FORENSIC SERVICES DIVISION Total: 5,301.00 Vendor: HEA04 - HEALTH CARE DENTAL TRUST
HEALTH CARE DENTAL TRUST 260515 05/15/2026 CITY PD FOR JUNE 2026 - PIE… 101-2001-0000-612090 350093 05/15/2026 127.80 HEALTH CARE DENTAL TRUST 260515 A 05/15/2026 CITY PD FOR JUNE 2026 - DA…101-2001-0000-612090 350093 05/15/2026 54.29 HEALTH CARE DENTAL TRUST 260515 B 05/15/2026 CITY PD FOR JUNE 2026 - CO… 101-2001-0000-612090 350093 05/15/2026 132.94 HEALTH CARE DENTAL TRUST 260515 C 05/15/2026 COBRA KAISER COVERAGE F… 101-210037 350093 05/15/2026 54.29 Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 13 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/15/2026 - 5/15/2026 5/15/2026 7:51:50 AM Page 3 of 7
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount HEALTH CARE DENTAL TRUST 260515 D 05/15/2026 COBRA KAISER COVERAGE F… 101-210037 350093 05/15/2026 54.29 Vendor HEA04 - HEALTH CARE DENTAL TRUST Total: 423.61
Vendor: BAN01 - HOLLIS BANKS - FACE PAINTER
HOLLIS BANKS - FACE PAINT… 260515 05/15/2026 FACE PAINT OR THE SUMMER…101-4002-0000-700085 350094 05/15/2026 280.00 Vendor BAN01 - HOLLIS BANKS - FACE PAINTER Total: 280.00 Vendor: INF04 - INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES
INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES 5419 05/15/2026 APR'26 GIS SUPP 29 HRS JOSE…101-1012-0000-630040 350095 05/15/2026 3,107.50 Vendor INF04 - INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES Total: 3,107.50
Vendor: KAI25 - KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALT… 260515 05/15/2026 CITY PD FOR JUNE 2026 - SIA… 101-2001-0000-612070 350096 05/15/2026 956.89 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALT… 260515 A 05/15/2026 CITY PD FOR JUNE 2026 - PIE… 101-2001-0000-612070 350096 05/15/2026 2,488.43 Vendor KAI25 - KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN Total: 3,445.32 Vendor: KIS02 - KIS
KIS 90967 05/15/2026 PO/101200 SOPHOS CNTRAL …101-1012-0000-650036 350097 05/15/2026 10,873.20 Vendor KIS02 - KIS Total: 10,873.20
Vendor: HUN04 - LARRYLOGIC PRODUCTIONS
LARRYLOGIC PRODUCTIONS 2365 05/15/2026 PRODU: Disas Prepare for Se… 101-1005-0000-700035 350098 05/15/2026 150.00 LARRYLOGIC PRODUCTIONS 2365 05/15/2026 PRODU: Disas Prepare for Se… 101-1005-0000-700035 350098 05/15/2026 225.00 LARRYLOGIC PRODUCTIONS 2367 05/15/2026 EARTH DAY - 4/23/26 CIT CH… 101-4002-0000-700015 350098 05/15/2026 360.00 LARRYLOGIC PRODUCTIONS 2367 05/15/2026 EARTH DAY - 4/23/26 CIT CH… 101-4002-0000-700015 350098 05/15/2026 270.00 LARRYLOGIC PRODUCTIONS 2370 05/15/2026 PLG COMM MTG-5/12/26; V… 101-4004-0000-630040 350098 05/15/2026 412.50 Vendor HUN04 - LARRYLOGIC PRODUCTIONS Total: 1,417.50
Vendor: MAB26 - M.A. BERGESEN CONTRACTOR
M.A. BERGESEN CONTRACTOR 260515 05/15/2026 BL#30378 ADJUSTED FLAT TO…101-0000-0000-404010 350099 05/15/2026 433.00 Vendor MAB26 - M.A. BERGESEN CONTRACTOR Total: 433.00
Vendor: MIS04 - MISAC
MISAC 200009314 05/15/2026 PREPARING IT LEADERSHIP F… 401-1012-0000-630017 350100 05/15/2026 500.00 Vendor MIS04 - MISAC Total: 500.00
Vendor: MSC26 - MS 2611 CONTRA COSTA BLVD LLC
MS 2611 CONTRA COSTA BL… 260515 05/15/2026 OVERPMT OF PHTID 4TH QTR…101-200020 350101 05/15/2026 84.08 Vendor MSC26 - MS 2611 CONTRA COSTA BLVD LLC Total: 84.08 Vendor: OFF20 - ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC
ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L…463016981001 05/15/2026 USB DEVICES 101-2001-0000-660016 350103 05/15/2026 34.37 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L…463030773001 05/15/2026 USB DEVICES, KNIVES, ETC 101-2001-0000-660016 350102 05/15/2026 112.92 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L…463030799001 05/15/2026 CUPS 101-2001-0000-660016 350104 05/15/2026 143.78 Vendor OFF20 - ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC Total: 291.07 Vendor: PEN26 - PENINSULAR REALTY, LLC
PENINSULAR REALTY, LLC 260515 05/15/2026 OVERPMT OF TOT NOV 2025 101-200020 350105 05/15/2026 80.00 Vendor PEN26 - PENINSULAR REALTY, LLC Total: 80.00
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 14 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/15/2026 - 5/15/2026 5/15/2026 7:51:50 AM Page 4 of 7
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount Vendor: PGE01 - PG&E
PG&E ACCT 1440264289-7 5526 05/15/2026 CH ELEC ACCT 1440264289-7…101-1016-0000-670015 350107 05/15/2026 12,733.25 PG&E ACCT 3856908898-2 5526 05/15/2026 DVWS-WTR PMP HOUSE ELEC…501-7010-0000-670015 350106 05/15/2026 2,843.62 Vendor PGE01 - PG&E Total: 15,576.87
Vendor: PLE20 - PLEASANT HILL RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT PLEASANT HILL RECREATION… SE2026 05/15/2026 SPONSO:Underwtr Egg Hunt,…101-4001-0000-660040 350108 05/15/2026 2,000.00 PLEASANT HILL RECREATION… SE2026 05/15/2026 SPONSO:Underwtr Egg Hunt,…101-4001-0000-660040 350108 05/15/2026 550.00 PLEASANT HILL RECREATION… SE2026 05/15/2026 SPONSO:Underwtr Egg Hunt,…101-4001-0000-660040 350108 05/15/2026 1,000.00 PLEASANT HILL RECREATION… SE2026 05/15/2026 SPONSO:Underwtr Egg Hunt,…101-4001-0000-660040 350108 05/15/2026 1,650.00 Vendor PLE20 - PLEASANT HILL RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT Total: 5,200.00 Vendor: PON24 - PON, BRADLEY
PON, BRADLEY 260515 05/15/2026 Per Diem/ Train Class/ Taser … 101-2001-0000-640011 350109 05/15/2026 90.00 Vendor PON24 - PON, BRADLEY Total: 90.00
Vendor: QUE08 - QUENCH USA, INC.

QUENCH USA, INC. INV10870595 05/15/2026 WORK ORDER 5/12/26 101-2001-0000-630040 350110 05/15/2026 88.00 Vendor QUE08 - QUENCH USA, INC. Total: 88.00
Vendor: REV01 - REVEL ENVIRONMENTAL MANUFACTURING, INC.

REVEL ENVIRONMENTAL MA… 70602 05/15/2026 JPHV CLEANOUT 231-5037-0000-630042 350111 05/15/2026 2,804.55 Vendor REV01 - REVEL ENVIRONMENTAL MANUFACTURING, INC. Total: 2,804.55 Vendor: ROB03 - ROBERT HALF
ROBERT HALF 66199209 05/15/2026 PYCK FOR PER-DIEM EMPLO… 101-2001-0000-611050 350112 05/15/2026 672.56 Vendor ROB03 - ROBERT HALF Total: 672.56
Vendor: ROS01 - RSG INC
RSG INC 15464 05/15/2026 PO/60010 REDEVELOP & HO… 899-6001-0000-750924 350113 05/15/2026 275.00 RSG INC 15556 05/15/2026 PO/60010 REDEVELOP & HO… 225-4027-0000-630040 350113 05/15/2026 538.75 Vendor ROS01 - RSG INC Total: 813.75
Vendor: SAN24 - SANCHEZ, DORI
SANCHEZ, DORI 175530 05/15/2026 FACE PAINTING FOR THE SU… 101-4002-0000-700085 350114 05/15/2026 300.00 Vendor SAN24 - SANCHEZ, DORI Total: 300.00
Vendor: SHR01 - SHRED-IT
SHRED-IT 05-03-2026 05/15/2026 PAPER SHREDDING SVC 101-2001-0000-630040 350115 05/15/2026 869.89 Vendor SHR01 - SHRED-IT Total: 869.89
Vendor: STA01 - STAPLES
STAPLES 7009667995 05/15/2026 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CH 101-1016-0000-660016 350116 05/15/2026 1,037.00 Vendor STA01 - STAPLES Total: 1,037.00
Vendor: T-M02 - T-MOBILE USA, INC
T-MOBILE USA, INC L2604290240 05/15/2026 INVESTIGATIONS PH TRACING…101-2001-0000-670020 350117 05/15/2026 50.00 Vendor T-M02 - T-MOBILE USA, INC Total: 50.00
Vendor: TYL02 - TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 025-552445 05/15/2026 PO/ 10100 BRITTANY WELLS … 101-1010-0000-630038 350118 05/15/2026 320.00 Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 15 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/15/2026 - 5/15/2026 5/15/2026 7:51:50 AM Page 5 of 7
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 025-552446 05/15/2026 PO/10120 ROBIN F. EPL DGE… 401-1012-0000-710841 350118 05/15/2026 450.00 Vendor TYL02 - TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC Total: 770.00
Vendor: VER09 - VERIZON WIRELESS
VERIZON WIRELESS 6142449487 05/15/2026 APR PHONE BILL FOR ACCT 6… 101-2001-0000-670010 350122 05/15/2026 3,713.85 VERIZON WIRELESS 6142449487 05/15/2026 APR PHONE BILL FOR ACCT 6… 402-2001-0000-650033 350122 05/15/2026 193.43 VERIZON WIRELESS 6142455721 05/15/2026 CHRG FOR ENGR APR 2ND-M…101-3001-0000-670010 350119 05/15/2026 442.29 VERIZON WIRELESS 6142455722 05/15/2026 BLDG DEPT PHONE BILL APR… 101-4013-0000-670010 350121 05/15/2026 214.30 VERIZON WIRELESS 6142493545 05/15/2026 PHONE SVC FOR PLG DIVI TR… 101-4004-0000-670020 350120 05/15/2026 151.63 Vendor VER09 - VERIZON WIRELESS Total: 4,715.50
Vendor: VIS05 - VISION SERVICE PLAN- (CA)
VISION SERVICE PLAN- (CA) 260515 05/15/2026 CITY PD FOR JUNE 2026 - PIE… 101-2001-0000-612130 350123 05/15/2026 15.22 Vendor VIS05 - VISION SERVICE PLAN- (CA) Total: 15.22
Vendor: AST02 - WAVE
WAVE 103859701-0012189 05/15/2026 CH INTERNET CONN ACCT 15… 101-1012-0000-670010 350125 05/15/2026 943.20 WAVE 136680201-0012189 05/15/2026 DRK FIB MAINT FOR CONN T… 101-1012-2001-670010 350124 05/15/2026 418.76 Vendor AST02 - WAVE Total: 1,361.96
Vendor: WAV26 - WAVEDIVISION HOLDINGS, LLC
WAVEDIVISION HOLDINGS, L… 260515 05/15/2026 BL#39264 PD W/ CK & CREDI… 101-200020 350126 05/15/2026 3,361.97 Vendor WAV26 - WAVEDIVISION HOLDINGS, LLC Total: 3,361.97 Grand Total: 154,843.46
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 16 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/15/2026 - 5/15/2026 5/15/2026 7:51:50 AM Page 6 of 7
Report Summary
Fund Summary
Fund Payment Amount
101 - GENERAL FUND 69,203.96
203 - DISABILITY ACCESS FUND 4.00
225 - LOW/MODERATE INCOME HOUSING-SUCCESSOR … 1,538.75
231 - NPDES/STORMWATER 3,910.30
301 - GAS TAX FUND 51,290.00
401 - CITY HALL/PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER TECHNOLOGY … 1,053.68 402 - PD TECHNOLOGY FUND 193.43
501 - DIABLO VISTA WATER FUND 27,374.34
899 - REDEVELOP PROP TAX TRUST FUND-SUCCESSOR A… 275.00 Grand Total: 154,843.46
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
101-0000-0000-404010 BUSINESS LICENSE FEE 1,347.80
101-1005-0000-700035 COMMISSION ON AGING 375.00
101-1010-0000-630038 CONSULTANT/OTHR 320.00
101-1012-0000-620052 EQ/LSE&INST PMT 1,612.79
101-1012-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 4,788.75
101-1012-0000-650036 MAINT/SOFTWARE 11,144.09
101-1012-0000-670010 UTIL/COMMUNCTNS 1,070.56
101-1012-0000-670020 UTIL/TELEPHONE 2,401.86
101-1012-2001-620052 EQ/LSE&INST PMT 1,051.25
101-1012-2001-670010 UTIL/COMMUNCTNS 418.76
101-1016-0000-660016 SUPPLIES/OFFICE 1,111.55
101-1016-0000-670015 UTIL/GAS-ELECTR 12,733.25
101-200020 SUSPENSE ACCOUNT 3,526.05
101-2001-0000-611050 SALARY-PART TIME TEM… 672.56
101-2001-0000-612070 INSURANCE/KAISER 3,445.32
101-2001-0000-612090 INSURANCE/DENTAL 315.03
101-2001-0000-612130 INSURANCE/VISION 15.22
101-2001-0000-630033 P.D. OTHER SVCS 5,301.00
101-2001-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 957.89
101-2001-0000-640011 POST TRAING SVC 90.00
101-2001-0000-650051 MAINT/P.D. AUTO 921.72
101-2001-0000-660014 SUPPLIES/OPERATING 160.78
101-2001-0000-660016 SUPPLIES/OFFICE 291.07
101-2001-0000-670010 UTIL/COMMUNCTNS 4,027.02
101-2001-0000-670020 UTIL/TELEPHONE 81.91
101-210037 COBRA - HEALTH BENEFI… 108.58
101-240073 DUE TO CIVIC ACTION C… 1,200.00
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 17 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/15/2026 - 5/15/2026 5/15/2026 7:51:50 AM Page 7 of 7
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
101-3001-0000-620122 PUBLICATIONS/SUBSCRI… 805.50
101-3001-0000-670010 UTIL/COMMUNCTNS 442.29
101-4001-0000-660040 SPCL EVENT SPNS 5,200.00
101-4002-0000-620112 ADVERTISINGADVERTISI… 52.43
101-4002-0000-700015 PROMOS/CONTRIBUTIO… 630.00
101-4002-0000-700085 SUMMER CONCERT SERI… 1,000.00
101-4004-0000-620112 ADVERTISING 805.50
101-4004-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 412.50
101-4004-0000-670020 UTIL/TELEPHONE 151.63
101-4013-0000-670010 UTIL/COMMUNCTNS 214.30
203-240096 DISABILITY ACCESS FEE 4.00
225-4027-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 1,538.75
231-3001-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 158.05
231-5037-0000-630042 NPDES COSTS 2,804.55
231-5065-0000-620131 PROJECT ADMIN COST 947.70
301-5139-6001-630034 ENGINEERING 51,290.00
401-1012-0000-630017 COMPTR TRAINING 500.00
401-1012-0000-660024 SUPPLIES/NON CAPITALI… 103.68
401-1012-0000-710841 CAPITAL ASSETS-SOFTW… 450.00
402-2001-0000-650033 MAINT/TELEPHONE 193.43
501-7010-0000-660013 SUPPLIES/RAW WATER 24,530.72
501-7010-0000-670015 UTIL/GAS-ELECTR 2,843.62
899-6001-0000-750924 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS… 275.00
Grand Total: 154,843.46
Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Payment Amount
**None** 154,843.46
Grand Total: 154,843.46
2026-05-15
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 18 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 5/22/2026 10:00:11 AM Page 1 of 7
Expense Approval Report
Pleasant Hill, CA By Vendor Name
Payment Dates 5/22/2026 - 5/22/2026
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount Vendor: AAN01 - AANTEX PEST CONTROL
AANTEX PEST CONTROL 720488 05/22/2026 MONTHLY PEST CONTROL AT…101-5097-0000-650016 350128 05/22/2026 85.00 Vendor AAN01 - AANTEX PEST CONTROL Total: 85.00
Vendor: ALL01 - AG SECURITY SERVICES, INC.

AG SECURITY SERVICES, INC. A521275 05/22/2026 MONTHLY RADIO MONITORI… 101-5097-0000-650041 350129 05/22/2026 62.92 Vendor ALL01 - AG SECURITY SERVICES, INC. Total: 62.92
Vendor: AMA05 - AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.

AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …1979-7TJR-HHJD 05/21/2026 SGN SUPP-STNLESS STEEL TG… 101-5097-0000-650017 350133 05/22/2026 90.51 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …1979-7TJR-HHJD 05/21/2026 SGN SUPP-STNLESS STEEL TG… 101-5097-0000-660030 350133 05/22/2026 42.16 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …11QP-CRVW-WT1J 05/22/2026 CH ELEVATOR-BATTERY BAC… 101-5097-0000-650017 350132 05/22/2026 186.81 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …133W-41CW-PCCF 05/22/2026 CH-BUFFET 67';UMBRELLA 101-5097-0000-650017 350131 05/22/2026 823.93 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …1D9W-WN3V-FJLV 05/22/2026 SIGN SUPP- FLARED LEG BRA… 101-5097-0000-660030 350130 05/22/2026 74.26 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, …1YDG-V3VR-JWRL 05/22/2026 TEA FOR CH 101-1016-0000-660016 350134 05/22/2026 14.99 Vendor AMA05 - AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. Total: 1,232.66 Vendor: ATT04 - AT&T
AT&T 25207061 05/22/2026 PHONE SVCS FOR ACCT 9391… 101-2001-0000-670020 350135 05/22/2026 41.73 Vendor ATT04 - AT&T Total: 41.73
Vendor: SHA15 - BATTERIES PLUS BULBS
BATTERIES PLUS BULBS P91557216;P91593368 05/22/2026 BATTERIES: SLI47AGM, SMC… 101-5097-0000-620065 350136 05/22/2026 279.44 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS P91557216;P91593368 05/22/2026 BATTERIES: SLI47AGM, SMC… 101-5097-0000-650016 350136 05/22/2026 22.89 BATTERIES PLUS BULBS P91557216;P91593368 05/22/2026 BATTERIES: SLI47AGM, SMC… 101-5097-0000-650017 350136 05/22/2026 158.50 Vendor SHA15 - BATTERIES PLUS BULBS Total: 460.83
Vendor: BMO24 - BMO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
BMO BANK NATIONAL ASSOC…2173658 05/22/2026 LOAN 379764821001 INSTAL…103-5105-0000-750030 350127 05/22/2026 1,113,082.69 BMO BANK NATIONAL ASSOC…2173658 05/22/2026 LOAN 379764821001 INSTAL…103-5105-0000-750040 350127 05/22/2026 133,103.19 Vendor BMO24 - BMO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Total: 1,246,185.88 Vendor: CHA21 - CHARLES KOPP INC dba CONTINENTAL ELECTRIC CHARLES KOPP INC dba CONT…CEI 13892; CEI 13910 05/22/2026 ELEC LGHT SVCS: RRFB-CCB/… 101-5097-0000-630040 350137 05/22/2026 10,283.95 CHARLES KOPP INC dba CONT…CEI 13892; CEI 13910 05/22/2026 ELEC LGHT SVCS: RRFB-CCB/… 101-5097-0000-650046 350137 05/22/2026 794.57 CHARLES KOPP INC dba CONT…CEI 13893 05/22/2026 ELEC LIGHT SVCS-CHILPA & C… 101-5097-0000-620154 350137 05/22/2026 914.90 Vendor CHA21 - CHARLES KOPP INC dba CONTINENTAL ELECTRIC Total: 11,993.42 Vendor: MAR02 - CITY OF MARTINEZ
CITY OF MARTINEZ 1375951 05/22/2026 MEDIAN IRRIGATION SVC ( 3… 226-4023-0000-670025 350138 05/22/2026 394.60 Vendor MAR02 - CITY OF MARTINEZ Total: 394.60
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 19 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/22/2026 - 5/22/2026 5/22/2026 10:00:11 AM Page 2 of 7
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount Vendor: CME01 - CME LIGHTING SUPPLY CO., INC.

CME LIGHTING SUPPLY CO., … 266922 05/22/2026 LIGHTING SUPP- CH ( COUNC…101-5097-0000-650017 350139 05/22/2026 167.35 Vendor CME01 - CME LIGHTING SUPPLY CO., INC. Total: 167.35 Vendor: CON31 - CONCORD FEED AND PET SUPP
CONCORD FEED AND PET SU… 19125/A 05/22/2026 25# BLU RIDGE KOI COLOR 101-5097-0000-650015 350140 05/22/2026 110.77 Vendor CON31 - CONCORD FEED AND PET SUPP Total: 110.77
Vendor: CCC54 - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH SVCS
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HE… 0326PH 05/22/2026 PERSONNEL COSTS CORE SV… 101-2010-0000-630040 350141 05/22/2026 27,860.00 Vendor CCC54 - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH SVCS Total: 27,860.00 Vendor: CON90 - CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES
CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SER… 260522 05/22/2026 S.A.R.T. EXAM BILLING- APR … 101-2001-0000-630033 350142 05/22/2026 1,700.00 Vendor CON90 - CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES Total: 1,700.00 Vendor: CRI07 - CRIME SCENE CLEANERS, INC
CRIME SCENE CLEANERS, INC 97452 05/22/2026 CLEAN-UP OF CAR 5471 101-2001-0000-630041 350143 05/22/2026 130.00 Vendor CRI07 - CRIME SCENE CLEANERS, INC Total: 130.00
Vendor: DEN03 - DENALECT ALARM CO.

DENALECT ALARM CO. 951539; 951540 05/22/2026 QRTRLY ALARM CHARGE AT … 101-1016-0000-630040 350144 05/22/2026 285.00 DENALECT ALARM CO. 951539; 951540 05/22/2026 QRTRLY ALARM CHARGE AT … 101-1016-0000-630040 350144 05/22/2026 90.00 Vendor DEN03 - DENALECT ALARM CO. Total: 375.00
Vendor: DEP06 - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 044330 05/22/2026 DOJ DOCUMENT PROCESSIN… 101-2001-0000-620123 350145 05/22/2026 32.00 Vendor DEP06 - DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Total: 32.00
Vendor: DIA11 - DIABLO PRESS
DIABLO PRESS 4565 05/22/2026 DUI CARDS 101-2001-0000-620116 350146 05/22/2026 225.77 Vendor DIA11 - DIABLO PRESS Total: 225.77
Vendor: DYN02 - DYNASTY ROOFING
DYNASTY ROOFING 1273 05/22/2026 SOUND SYSTEM FOR SUMM… 101-4002-0000-700085 350147 05/22/2026 2,950.00 Vendor DYN02 - DYNASTY ROOFING Total: 2,950.00
Vendor: EAS01 - EBMUD PAYMENT CENTER
EBMUD PAYMENT CENTER 260522 05/22/2026 WHITE ZONE 101-5097-0000-670025 350148 05/22/2026 1,994.50 EBMUD PAYMENT CENTER 260522 05/22/2026 BLUE ZONE 5 226-4023-0000-670025 350148 05/22/2026 91.76 Vendor EAS01 - EBMUD PAYMENT CENTER Total: 2,086.26
Vendor: EWI01 - EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS, INC.

EWING IRRIGATION PRODUC… 30039932;30062994 05/22/2026 LANDSCAPING ITEMS CITYW… 101-5097-0000-660036 350149 05/22/2026 1,899.51 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUC… 30039932;30062994 05/22/2026 LANDSCAPING ITEMS CITYW… 226-4019-0000-660036 350149 05/22/2026 17.73 Vendor EWI01 - EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS, INC. Total: 1,917.24 Vendor: FAS10 - FASTRAK INVOICE PROCESSING DEPT
FASTRAK INVOICE PROCESSI… I712162044493 05/22/2026 BRIDGE TOLL, BENICIA. MART…101-5097-0000-660014 350150 05/22/2026 8.50 Vendor FAS10 - FASTRAK INVOICE PROCESSING DEPT Total: 8.50 Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 20 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/22/2026 - 5/22/2026 5/22/2026 10:00:11 AM Page 3 of 7
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount Vendor: FOL01 - FOLGERGRAPHICS
FOLGERGRAPHICS 146887 05/22/2026 DIVERSITY COMM EVENT PO… 101-1005-0000-700036 350151 05/22/2026 196.65 Vendor FOL01 - FOLGERGRAPHICS Total: 196.65
Vendor: FRA28 - FRANK + GROSSMAN LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS, INC.

FRANK + GROSSMAN LANDS… 40671 05/22/2026 MAY'26 JANITOR SVCS PD, P… 101-5097-0000-650012 350152 05/22/2026 6,200.00 FRANK + GROSSMAN LANDS… 40671 05/22/2026 MAY'26 JANITOR SVCS PD, P… 101-5097-0000-650012 350152 05/22/2026 4,500.00 FRANK + GROSSMAN LANDS… 40671 05/22/2026 MAY'26 JANITOR SVCS PD, P… 101-5097-0000-650012 350152 05/22/2026 1,050.00 FRANK + GROSSMAN LANDS… 40671 05/22/2026 MAY'26 JANITOR SVCS PD, P… 103-5105-0000-660021 350152 05/22/2026 6,350.00 Vendor FRA28 - FRANK + GROSSMAN LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS, INC. Total: 18,100.00 Vendor: FUT05 - FUTURE FORD OF CONCORD LLC
FUTURE FORD OF CONCORD …347908 05/22/2026 PARTS ( VIN's 22532 & 12118…101-5097-0000-620065 350153 05/22/2026 923.05 FUTURE FORD OF CONCORD …347910;346832 05/22/2026 PARTS( VIN's 22532 & 12118)…101-5097-0000-620065 350153 05/22/2026 -1,049.82 FUTURE FORD OF CONCORD …347910;346832 05/22/2026 PARTS( VIN's 22532 & 12118)…101-5097-0000-620065 350153 05/22/2026 1,850.30 FUTURE FORD OF CONCORD …347910;346832 05/22/2026 PARTS( VIN'x 101-5097-0000-620065 350153 05/22/2026 1,049.82 Vendor FUT05 - FUTURE FORD OF CONCORD LLC Total: 2,773.35 Vendor: GRA04 - GRAINGER
GRAINGER 9891046840 05/22/2026 SUPPLIES FOR PESTICIDE RO… 101-5097-0000-660035 350154 05/22/2026 156.83 GRAINGER 9898786034 05/22/2026 SUPPLIES FOR PESTICIDE RO… 101-5097-0000-660035 350154 05/22/2026 835.55 GRAINGER 9903468321 05/22/2026 SUPPLIES FOR PESTICIDE RO… 101-5097-0000-660035 350154 05/22/2026 17.08 GRAINGER 9911816222 05/22/2026 SUPPLIES FOR PESTICIDE RO… 101-5097-0000-660014 350154 05/22/2026 2,253.24 GRAINGER 9915238217 05/22/2026 SUPPLIES FOR PESTICIDE RO… 101-5097-0000-650016 350154 05/22/2026 36.98 Vendor GRA04 - GRAINGER Total: 3,299.68
Vendor: HON01 - HONEYWELL INT'L INC.

HONEYWELL INT'L INC. 5272961346 05/22/2026 DVWS ANNU NWSLETTR- PR… 308-5148-0000-630034 350155 05/22/2026 52,323.34 Vendor HON01 - HONEYWELL INT'L INC. Total: 52,323.34
Vendor: LAW08 - LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTER OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINI… 26-27728 05/22/2026 DEFEN TACT INSTRU COURSE…101-2001-0000-640011 350156 05/22/2026 1,578.00 Vendor LAW08 - LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTER OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF Total: 1,578.00 Vendor: LEO01 - LEONARD, BRIAN
LEONARD, BRIAN 260522 05/22/2026 REIMB OF EXPEN PAID BY E… 101-2001-0000-660026 350157 05/22/2026 256.55 LEONARD, BRIAN 260522 A 05/22/2026 REIMBURSEMENT VEHICLE P… 411-2001-0000-710855 350157 05/22/2026 160.67 LEONARD, BRIAN 260522 B 05/22/2026 REIMB HOTEL EXEC DEVELP … 101-2001-0000-640011 350157 05/22/2026 843.95 Vendor LEO01 - LEONARD, BRIAN Total: 1,261.17
Vendor: MIN06 - MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS 30471 05/22/2026 2026 SS4A GRANT MAILOUT 301-5139-0000-620131 350158 05/22/2026 1,464.93 MINUTEMAN PRESS 30472 05/22/2026 DVWS ANNU NWSLTTR- PRN… 501-7010-0000-620113 350158 05/22/2026 792.59 Vendor MIN06 - MINUTEMAN PRESS Total: 2,257.52
Vendor: MOR08 - MORGAN-BONANNO DEVELOPMENT, INC.

MORGAN-BONANNO DEVEL… 7392;7393 05/22/2026 VARIOUS PATCH: THREE SPO… 101-5097-0000-650023 350159 05/22/2026 4,525.00 MORGAN-BONANNO DEVEL… 7392;7393 05/22/2026 VARIOUS PATCH: THREE SPO… 101-5097-0000-650023 350159 05/22/2026 2,555.00 Vendor MOR08 - MORGAN-BONANNO DEVELOPMENT, INC. Total: 7,080.00 Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 21 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/22/2026 - 5/22/2026 5/22/2026 10:00:11 AM Page 4 of 7
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount Vendor: MUL06 - MULHEARN, MIKE
MULHEARN, MIKE 260522 05/22/2026 REIMBURSEMENT - SAFETY G…101-5097-0000-660038 350160 05/22/2026 165.49 Vendor MUL06 - MULHEARN, MIKE Total: 165.49
Vendor: OFF20 - ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC
ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L…467158661001 05/22/2026 COFFEE AND DISINFECTING … 101-2001-0000-660016 350161 05/22/2026 194.27 Vendor OFF20 - ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC Total: 194.27 Vendor: PGE01 - PG&E
PG&E ACCT 1132206793-2 51326 05/22/2026 GAS 101-2001-0000-670015 350162 05/22/2026 179.05 Vendor PGE01 - PG&E Total: 179.05
Vendor: TPF01 - PLEASANT HILL CRESCENT DR. INVESTORS, LLC PLEASANT HILL CRESCENT DR…APR 2026 05/22/2026 DOWNTOWN EXPENSES - AP… 226-4024-0000-630040 350163 05/22/2026 3,500.00 PLEASANT HILL CRESCENT DR…APR 2026 05/22/2026 DOWNTOWN EXPENSES - AP… 226-4024-0000-630040 350163 05/22/2026 12,466.00 PLEASANT HILL CRESCENT DR…APR 2026 05/22/2026 DOWNTOWN EXPENSES - AP… 226-4024-0000-630040 350163 05/22/2026 2,500.00 Vendor TPF01 - PLEASANT HILL CRESCENT DR. INVESTORS, LLC Total: 18,466.00 Vendor: QUA12 - QUALITY TREE CARE
QUALITY TREE CARE 1551324 05/22/2026 TREE REMOVAL AT TAYLOR /…308-5007-0000-800030 350164 05/22/2026 4,800.00 Vendor QUA12 - QUALITY TREE CARE Total: 4,800.00
Vendor: RAP25 - RAPID GRADING SERVICES
RAPID GRADING SERVICES RETENTION PAYMENT 05/22/2026 PO/ 50630 2025 POTHOLE R… 301-5063-0000-800030 350165 05/22/2026 7,176.15 RAPID GRADING SERVICES RETENTION PMT 05/22/2026 PO/ 50630 2025 POTHOLE R… 301-5063-0000-800030 350165 05/22/2026 47,132.66 Vendor RAP25 - RAPID GRADING SERVICES Total: 54,308.81
Vendor: ALL02 - REPUBLIC SERVICES
REPUBLIC SERVICES 260522 05/22/2026 SVCS- CURBSIDE OIL COLL JA… 201-4009-0000-630040 350166 05/22/2026 879.85 Vendor ALL02 - REPUBLIC SERVICES Total: 879.85
Vendor: RRM24 - RRM DESIGN GROUP
RRM DESIGN GROUP 3460-02-PP26-3 05/22/2026 PH ADU 2025 CODE UPDATE 101-4004-0000-630038 350167 05/22/2026 130.00 Vendor RRM24 - RRM DESIGN GROUP Total: 130.00
Vendor: SAF01 - SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC
SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC 99924114 05/22/2026 USED OIL DRUM PICKUP/DIS… 101-5097-0000-650047 350168 05/22/2026 269.50 Vendor SAF01 - SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC Total: 269.50
Vendor: SOU05 - SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC
SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC 260522 05/22/2026 Training Course Fee/Field Tra…101-2001-0000-640011 350169 05/22/2026 337.00 Vendor SOU05 - SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC Total: 337.00
Vendor: SUP02 - SUPER STATION CAR WASH
SUPER STATION CAR WASH 7953 05/22/2026 CAR WASHES FOR APR 2026 101-2001-0000-650051 350170 05/22/2026 202.80 Vendor SUP02 - SUPER STATION CAR WASH Total: 202.80
Vendor: THA27 - THAITOPIA LLC
THAITOPIA LLC 260522 05/22/2026 CST RECO REF OF ENT-2026-… 101-220010 350171 05/22/2026 2,500.00 Vendor THA27 - THAITOPIA LLC Total: 2,500.00
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 22 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/22/2026 - 5/22/2026 5/22/2026 10:00:11 AM Page 5 of 7
Vendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item) Account Number Payment Number Payment Date Amount Vendor: T-M02 - T-MOBILE USA, INC
T-MOBILE USA, INC L2605060153 05/22/2026 INVESTIGATIONS PHONE TR… 101-2001-0000-670020 350172 05/22/2026 50.00 Vendor T-M02 - T-MOBILE USA, INC Total: 50.00
Vendor: TOY01 - TOYOTA WALNUT CREEK, INC
TOYOTA WALNUT CREEK, INC 847636 05/22/2026 COVER, FOG LAMP 101-5097-0000-620065 350173 05/22/2026 78.79 Vendor TOY01 - TOYOTA WALNUT CREEK, INC Total: 78.79
Vendor: URR25 - URRUTIA,DANNY
URRUTIA,DANNY 260522 05/22/2026 REIMBURSEMENT- CCC REC… 101-3001-0000-620123 350174 05/22/2026 102.50 Vendor URR25 - URRUTIA,DANNY Total: 102.50
Vendor: VER09 - VERIZON WIRELESS
VERIZON WIRELESS 6142455720 05/22/2026 PHONE SVC- PSC ( APR 02 - … 101-5097-0000-670010 350176 05/22/2026 875.38 VERIZON WIRELESS 6142707380 05/22/2026 DVWS- PHONES ACCT 84201… 501-7010-0000-670010 350175 05/22/2026 102.85 Vendor VER09 - VERIZON WIRELESS Total: 978.23
Vendor: WAL21 - WALNUT CREEK CHRYSLER JEE
WALNUT CREEK CHRYSLER JEE 458858JEW 05/22/2026 AUTO PARTS FOR SHOP 101-5097-0000-620065 350177 05/22/2026 231.48 Vendor WAL21 - WALNUT CREEK CHRYSLER JEE Total: 231.48
Vendor: ACE21 - WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE
WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601420;17601423 05/22/2026 2 BULK FASTENERS 103-5105-0000-650017 350178 05/22/2026 1.73 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601420;17601423 05/22/2026 3 GASSER GIANT DESTROYR… 103-5105-0000-650017 350178 05/22/2026 32.74 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601425;17601439 05/22/2026 5 SPRYPNT 2X SAT GRANITE 101-5097-0000-660029 350178 05/22/2026 43.65 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601425;17601439 05/22/2026 ROPE NYLON S.BRD 1/4-100 101-5097-0000-660030 350178 05/22/2026 41.49 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601426;17601428 05/22/2026 DAMPRID TUB LVNVAN 101-5097-0000-650016 350178 05/22/2026 6.54 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601426;17601428 05/22/2026 2 CMPRSN UNION 3/8'X3/8' … 101-5097-0000-650016 350178 05/22/2026 20.95 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601434;17601452 05/22/2026 TRWL MET 4.5X11'1PK;MLTI… 101-5097-0000-660036 350178 05/22/2026 22.92 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601434;17601452 05/22/2026 TRWL MET 4.5X11'1PK;MLTI… 226-4023-0000-660036 350178 05/22/2026 -141.92 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601434;17601452 05/22/2026 TRWL MET 4.5X11'1PK;MLTI… 226-4023-0000-660036 350178 05/22/2026 141.92 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601444 05/22/2026 PAINT SCRPR 4-EDG 2-1/2';C… 101-5097-0000-650016 350178 05/22/2026 58.91 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601457;17601462 05/22/2026 LID F/10GL CANGTRAY;TRASH…101-5097-0000-650017 350178 05/22/2026 69.42 WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE 17601457;17601462 05/22/2026 BULK FASTENERS 101-5097-0000-650017 350178 05/22/2026 35.35 Vendor ACE21 - WESTLAKE ACE HARDWARE Total: 333.70
Vendor: WEX02 - WEX HEALTH, INC.

WEX HEALTH, INC. 2361604-IN 05/22/2026 FSA MONTHLY FEE APR 2026 101-1010-0000-612170 350179 05/22/2026 73.50 Vendor WEX02 - WEX HEALTH, INC. Total: 73.50
Vendor: WIL26 - WILLIAMSON, JASON
WILLIAMSON, JASON 260522 05/22/2026 MEDICAL EXAM REIMBURSE… 101-5097-0000-630032 350180 05/22/2026 100.00 Vendor WIL26 - WILLIAMSON, JASON Total: 100.00
Grand Total: 1,471,270.61
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 23 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/22/2026 - 5/22/2026 5/22/2026 10:00:11 AM Page 6 of 7
Report Summary
Fund Summary
Fund Payment Amount
101 - GENERAL FUND 84,897.13
103 - MEASURE K FUND 1,252,570.35
201 - WASTE MANAGEMENT/RECYCLING FUND 879.85
226 - COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING - DISTRICT … 18,970.09 301 - GAS TAX FUND 55,773.74
308 - CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 57,123.34
411 - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 160.67
501 - DIABLO VISTA WATER FUND 895.44
Grand Total: 1,471,270.61
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
101-1005-0000-700036 CM DIVERSITY COMMISS… 196.65
101-1010-0000-612170 FLEXIBLE SPENDING AD… 73.50
101-1016-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 375.00
101-1016-0000-660016 SUPPLIES/OFFICE 14.99
101-2001-0000-620116 PD PRINTING 225.77
101-2001-0000-620123 GOVERNMENT LICENSE … 32.00
101-2001-0000-630033 P.D. OTHER SVCS 1,700.00
101-2001-0000-630041 HAZ WASTE SVCS 130.00
101-2001-0000-640011 POST TRAING SVC 2,758.95
101-2001-0000-650051 MAINT/P.D. AUTO 202.80
101-2001-0000-660016 SUPPLIES/OFFICE 194.27
101-2001-0000-660026 SAFETY EQUIPMENT REP… 256.55
101-2001-0000-670015 UTIL/GAS-ELECTR 179.05
101-2001-0000-670020 UTIL/TELEPHONE 91.73
101-2010-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 27,860.00
101-220010 COST RECOVERY ACCT P… 2,500.00
101-3001-0000-620123 GOVERNMENT LICENSE … 102.50
101-4002-0000-700085 SUMMER CONCERT SERI… 2,950.00
101-4004-0000-630038 CONSULTANT/OTHR 130.00
101-5097-0000-620065 AUTO/PRTS/TIRES 3,363.06
101-5097-0000-620154 REIMBURSEABLE DAMA… 914.90
101-5097-0000-630032 PSYCH EVAL SVCS 100.00
101-5097-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 10,283.95
101-5097-0000-650012 MAINT/JANITORALMAIN… 11,750.00
101-5097-0000-650015 MNT/FNTN & LAKE 110.77
101-5097-0000-650016 MAINT/PD BLDG 231.27
101-5097-0000-650017 MAINT/CH BLDG 1,531.87
101-5097-0000-650023 MAINT/STREETS 7,080.00
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 24 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 5/22/2026 - 5/22/2026 5/22/2026 10:00:11 AM Page 7 of 7
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
101-5097-0000-650041 MAINT/FIR/SCRTY 62.92
101-5097-0000-650046 MAINT/STR LITES 794.57
101-5097-0000-650047 MNT/HAZ WST MGT 269.50
101-5097-0000-660014 SUPPLIES/OPERATING 2,261.74
101-5097-0000-660029 SUPPLIES/GRAFITTI RE… 43.65
101-5097-0000-660030 SUPPLIES/SIGN MATERI… 157.91
101-5097-0000-660035 SUPPLIES/PESTICIDE 1,009.46
101-5097-0000-660036 SUPPLIES/LAND MATERI… 1,922.43
101-5097-0000-660038 SUPPLIES/SAFETY 165.49
101-5097-0000-670010 UTIL/COMMUNCTNS 875.38
101-5097-0000-670025 UTIL/WATER 1,994.50
103-5105-0000-650017 MAINT/CH BLDG 34.47
103-5105-0000-660021 SUPLS/JANITORAL 6,350.00
103-5105-0000-750030 PRINCIPAL/BNDS,NOTES 1,113,082.69
103-5105-0000-750040 INTEREST/BNDS,NOTES 133,103.19
201-4009-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 879.85
226-4019-0000-660036 SUPPLIES/LAND MATERI… 17.73
226-4023-0000-660036 SUPPLIES/LAND MATERI… 0.00
226-4023-0000-670025 UTIL/WATER 486.36
226-4024-0000-630040 CONTRACTUAL SVC 18,466.00
301-5063-0000-800030 CONSTRUCTION 54,308.81
301-5139-0000-620131 PROJ ADMIN COST 1,464.93
308-5007-0000-800030 CONSTRUCTION 4,800.00
308-5148-0000-630034 ENGINEERING 52,323.34
411-2001-0000-710855 CAPITAL ASSETS-AUTO/… 160.67
501-7010-0000-620113 POSTAGE 792.59
501-7010-0000-670010 UTIL/COMMUNCTNS 102.85
Grand Total: 1,471,270.61
Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Payment Amount
**None** 1,471,270.61
Grand Total: 1,471,270.61
2026-05-22
Item 9.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 25 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 1, 2026
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
TITLE: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO.__ AMENDING CHAPTER 5.55, TRAFFIC

MITIGATION FEE, OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL MUNICIPAL

CODE WITH AN UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY

SYNOPSIS
The Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a development impact fee authorized under the Mitigation Fee Act (AB 1600) to fund transportation improvements required to accommodate growth from new development. The Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study and Fee Calculation Guidelines, prepared by Fehr and Peers and dated April 16th, 2026, calculates the recommended fees and provides a legally defensible framework to ensure that new development contributes proportionately to the cost of transportation improvements necessitated by growth. The Nexus Study suggests that the City increases their fee from the current rate, which was previously established from a study performed in 2003.

The ordinance (See Attachment “A”), amending Chapter 5.55 of the Pleasant Hill Municipal Code (“PHMC”) was introduced at the City Council Meeting on May 18, 2026. It is now ready for the second reading, also known as the adoption.

Should the ordinance be adopted, it will become effective 30 days later on July 1, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
The new methodology will provide a legally defensible framework behind imposing traffic impact fees on new development. If the ordinance does not change and the TIF remains the same, the City will have insufficient funding to address traffic issues resulting from future development and population increase.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 26 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page. The TIF Study and Fee Calculation Guidelines were posted on the City’s website on April 17th, 2026.

Additionally, the proposed TIF ordinance update was posted in the newspaper on May 11th and May 20th.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Adopt Ordinance No.__ Amending Chapter 5.55, Traffic Mitigation Fee, of the City of Pleasant Hill Municipal Code Adopting an Updated Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
None recommended.

Should the Council not authorize the ordinance update, the City will not be able to collect a TIF.

In that case, the Council could elect to subsidize future projects using General Fund resources; otherwise, future Capital Improvement Projects may face insufficient funding.

ATTACHMENT(S)
Proposed Ordinance
Prepared by: Laetitia Porta, Senior Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Ann James, Public Works Director
Approved by: Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager
Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 27 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL AMENDING CHAMPTER 5.55, TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE, OF THE PLEASANT HILL

MUNICIPAL CODE WITH AN UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY WHEREAS, in 1989, a Traffic Impact Fee was authorized under the Mitigation Fee Act (Assembly Bill 1600) and is intended to fund street and transportation improvement projects necessary to accommodate growth resulting from new development; and WHEREAS, The City’s current citywide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program was established in 2003. The current program is based on a “system equity” approach, in which the TIF is based on a cost per trip using the citywide built infrastructure as the cost basis. As required by state law, City staff includes the TIF program in the City’s annual financial reports, and, per Municipal Code

5.55.050, the traffic impact fee is increased annually based on the construction cost index; and WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act requires that development impact fees be supported by a nexus analysis demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the impacts of new development, the need for public facilities, and the amount of the fee charged; and WHEREAS, on March 13th, 2023, the City executed an Agreement for Professional Services with Fehr & Peers to conduct the Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study and recommend revised fees; and,
WHEREAS, Fehr & Peers prepared a final Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study dated September 25, 2025, which evaluates existing and future transportation conditions, identifies necessary transportation improvements, and establishes a reasonable relationship between new development and the need for those improvements; and,
WHEREAS, Fehr & Peers recommends increased Traffic Impact Fee rates consistent with the findings of the Nexus Study to ensure that new development contributes its fair share toward mitigating transportation impacts; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance was introduced at the City Council meeting of May 18, 2026.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Chapter 5.55 of the Pleasant Hill Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
§ 5.55.010 Intent and Purpose.

A. In keeping with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (AB 1600, CA Govt Code sections 66000 through 66025), and mindful of the City’s policy that new development pay for the cost of improvements to the citywide transportation system necessary to accommodate or offset the impacts generated by the new development, the City adopts a Traffic Impact Fee (“TIF”). (See, City of Pleasant Hill General Plan 2040, adopted May, 2023.) Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 28 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 B. Adopting and implementing a TIF is a fair and equitable method of securing some of the revenues necessary to construct the required transportation improvements as a result of, and to the extent to which new development generates the need for additional transportation improvements.

C. The City of Pleasant Hill is close to being built out under its general plan. Approaching buildout has implications for the type of facilities needed to accommodate growth. Large capacityincreasing projects such as street extensions and widenings and interchange improvements are no longer a practical method for accommodating growth. Rather, a range of upgrades to the existing system of transportation improvements, including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, better represent the remaining improvements needed to complete the transportation system.

D. Many types of improvement projects across all modes (vehicle, transit, bicycle and pedestrian) can accommodate or offset the impacts generated by new development. The Pleasant Hill General Plan 2040 and specifically, the Transportation and Circulation Element, specifies certain policies that support the need to provide a TIF to fund projects to fulfill these goals, including, but not limited to, TC – 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 5.3, 8.5, 8.6, 8.8, 8.10, 9.3, 9.4, 11.1 and 11.2. Examples of upgrades needed to accommodate new development include but are not limited to: minor intersection improvements such as adding turn lanes; upgrades to traffic control devices (traffic signals) and improved interconnects; completion of gaps in the street, transit, bicycle and pedestrian network; and improvements to substandard street, transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

E. The traffic impact fee must fairly apportion to new development a fair share of the City's costs for transportation improvements. New development's fair share should be based on the capital improvement projects needed to accommodate the additional demand generated by the new development.

F. In the absence of this Chapter imposing a TIF, existing and future sources of revenue will be inadequate to fund the transportation improvements which are necessary to avoid unacceptable levels of congestion and related adverse impacts created by expected development within the City.

G. To update and properly evaluate the relationship (or “nexus”) between anticipated future development in the City, the need for new infrastructure to support that development, and the fees that will be charged to help fund that infrastructure, the City retained Fehr & Peers to undertake a study entitled “Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update” dated April 16, 2026. A copy of this study is on file in City offices.

H. By adopting this Chapter, it is the intent of the Pleasant Hill City Council to adopt a fair and equitable method of securing some of the revenues necessary to fund the construction and implementation of transportation improvements in the City to accommodate the traffic volumes generated by new development.

I. The City Council intends to update the City’s TIF by including a new list of capital improvement projects, reflect the most recent projections of population and employment growth in the City, and change the approach used to calculate fees from the current “ system equity” approach to one in which the fee is calculated based on the costs of a specific list of capital improvement projects.

The fees will continue to be applied to new development that occurs anywhere in the City of Pleasant Hill.

Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 29 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 § 5.55.020 Findings and Requirements.

Consistent with AB 1600 (CA Govt. Code §§ 66000 through 66025), the City Council finds as follows:

A. Purpose. The purpose of the TIF is to fund transportation improvements to accommodate or offset the impact from new development in the City.

B. Use of the TIF. The TIF revenues will be used to help fund a proposed list of projects found in Figure 1 and Table 2 (pages 5-7) of the “Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update dated April 16, 2026”.

C. Relationship between the TIF’s use and the type of development on which the TIF is imposed.

Different types of development generate traffic with different characteristics. The calculations presented in Tables 4 and 5 of the “Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update dated April 16, 2026” account for these characteristics by calculating the travel-related characteristics of different land use types. These considerations account for the differential impacts on the local transportation system generated by different development types.

D. Relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development on which the TIF is imposed. The need for the facilities listed in Table 2 of the “Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update dated April 16, 2026” has been established through local planning processes prepared by the City of Pleasant Hill.

E. Determining a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and cost of the public facility (or portion of the public facility) attributable to new development. Section 4 of the “Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update dated April 16, 2026” describes the calculations applied to determine the cost of the public facilities that is attributable to new development in the TIF area.

F. If the nexus study supports the increase of an existing TIF, review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee.

The TIF program and ordinance were established in 2003 using a “system equity” approach in which fees were calculated as a cost per trip based on the value of the City’s existing transportation system and adjusted annually to reflect changes in construction costs. Since its adoption, the City has prepared annual reports documenting fee activity, and the Traffic Mitigation Fund has been included in the City’s audited financial statements. These reports show that revenues have been collected and used to support transportation improvements, with amounts varying in line with development activity. The current update shifts the program from the system equity method to a project-based calculation using the costs of a defined list of transportation projects in the City’s 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Plan. Because this methodology directly reflects the identified project costs needed to accommodate growth, the updated fee levels are higher than under the prior approach and align the program with the cost of planned improvements.

G. Calculate a fee imposed on a housing development proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development or explain why that would not be an appropriate metric for calculating fees. The TIF on housing developments has always been calculated based on the type of unit, with one level for single family units and another for multi-family units. This has been a common practice for most fee programs throughout the State of California.

Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 30 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 For the City’s TIF Program, this practice aligns with readily available data about the transportation impacts of housing developments. Industry standard reference documents about trip generation rates and trip lengths, present that data for all types of housing units combined and do not typically present that data based on the unit size. Moreover, there is no available reference document that directly links trip generation rates to the square footage of a housing unit.

Since there is not a wide variation in house size in the City, the City is largely built out, and given the lack of consistent and available sources of data, the City has concluded that square footage, currently, is not an appropriate metric to use in calculating fees on residential developments, nor is there substantial evidence that the current method of calculating fees is disproportionate to a residential development’s effects on the transportation system.

H. Adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study. The City maintains a Capital Improvement Plan, most recently updated for the 2024-2029 period and this plan was used to identify projects for updating the City’s TIF Program.
§ 5.55.030 Definitions.

In this Chapter:

A. Development means:

1. Any new construction, or any addition, extension, or enlargement of an existing structure or unit, which includes a dwelling unit for residential use or the gross floor area of retail, office or industrial use; or

2. Any conversion or change in use of an existing structure requiring City approval, including a building permit, which would result in a change in the land use category (resulting in an increase in the trip demand factor applicable to the structure).

B. Gross floor area means the sum of the square footage of the floor area at each floor level included within the exterior walls of a building or portions thereof, including mezzanines and lobbies. It excludes floor area devoted to vehicle parking, necessary interior driveways and ramps.

C. Land use category means any of the following specific land uses:

1. Residential;
a. Single-family;
b. Multifamily;

2. Nonresidential;
a. Retail;
b. Office;
c. Industrial.

D. Transportation improvements, system of transportation improvements and facilities mean the list of proposed TIF projects found in Figure 1 and Table 2 (pages 5-7) of the “Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update dated April 16, 2026”.

E. Traffic fee study means the "Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update," dated April 16, 2026, Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 31 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 prepared by Fehr & Peers and on file in the City offices. § 5.55.040 Applicability – Time of Payment.

A. Applicability. Except as provided in Pleasant Hill Municipal Code (PHMC) §5.55.060 Exemptions, this Chapter applies to each development within the City for which a building permit or other entitlement for development is issued.

B. Time of payment. The traffic impact fee is due:

1. For residential development, before the final inspection, or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued, whichever occurs first. (Govt. Code § 66007(a).)

2. For nonresidential development, before the issuance of the building permit. § 5.55.050 Establishing the Fee – Fee amount – Annual adjustment.

A. Establishing the fee. The traffic fee study establishes a common basis for assessing fees across different land use categories by calculating a Trip Demand Factor, reflecting characteristics of each land use, including the trip generation rate, the proportion of new and pass-by trips and trip lengths. (See Table 4, page 9, Trip Demand Factors, in the traffic fee study.) The Adjusted Daily trip Demand Factors are then used to calculate the total growth in Adjusted Daily Trips. Table 5, page 10, Growth Converted to Adjusted Daily Trips in the traffic fee study displays how that growth was modified by the trip demand factors to derive total growth expressed in units of Adjusted Daily Trips.

B. Fee amount. The amount of TIF required of the development shall be determined by the Director of Public Works or their designee in accordance with this section, which is based on the traffic fee study.

Land Use
Category Unit Fee Per DUE
DUE
Factor
Raw Fee
Per Unit
Admin Charge
(2%)
Total Fee
Per Unit
Residential
Single-Family DU $7,401 1.00 $7401 $148 $7,549
Multifamily DU $7,401 0.71 $5290 $106 $5,396
Nonresidential
Retail KSF $7,401 2.39 $17,693 $354 $18,047
Office KSF $7,401 1.64 $12,132 $243 $12,374
Industrial KSF $7,401 0.74 $5,507 $110 $5,617
Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 32 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Other Daily
Trip
__ __ $917 $18 $936
In determining the land use category for which a fee applies, the fee shall be charged on the basis of the primary use of the building as a whole. The City shall use the category which in its judgment most nearly fits the proposed use. The Director of Public Works may refer to specific uses described in the PHMC Chapter 18 Zoning and to the Standard Industrial Classification Manual (SIC). The City has adopted fee calculation guidelines that provide additional specificity on how the TIF will be applied to individual development applications. The guidelines support consistent implementation by identifying the applicable land use categories and setting procedures for calculating the fee for new construction, intensification of use, and land uses that do not fit within the City’s standard fee categories.

C. Annual adjustment of the rate based on construction cost index. The fee shall be increased annually in the City’s Master Fee Schedule based on the Engineering News Record 20-city construction cost index listed in the prior October 1st issue, as published by McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. Annual increases are capped at 4% (four percent). § 5.55.060 Exemptions.

The following development projects are exempt, in whole or in part, from the TIF otherwise required by this Chapter:

A. Capital improvements and/or buildings or structures related to the operation of the City, Contra Costa County, state or federal governments including, but not limited to, police and fire stations, Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District facilities, parking lots, offices, equipment yards, sanitation facilities, parks and similar facilities in or through which general government operations are conducted. This section does not create an exemption for private commercial or industrial activities conducted on public lands.

B. Temporary uses less than 12 months in duration.

C. Additions, extensions or enlargements of an existing residential structure which, in any twoyear period, increases the gross floor area by less than 800 square feet.

D. Additions, extensions or enlargements of an existing commercial or industrial structure which, in any one calendar year, increases the gross floor area of such structure by 200 square feet or less.

E. No fee is due if a traffic mitigation fee was previously paid in full for the property, unless there is a change of use which requires a use permit or tenant improvements. In such case, the applicant shall pay the incremental difference between the previously paid fee and the applicable fee for the proposed new use.
§ 5.55.070 Use of Funds.

The fees paid under this Chapter, and interest income earned, shall be used solely for the purpose of constructing or providing the list of transportation improvements. § 5.55.080 Refunds.

Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 33 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 The City’s Chief Building Official may authorize a refund if all of the following occur:

1. The building permit expires and no extension has been granted for a development for which the fee has been collected; and

2. No substantial work has been done; and

3. The claim for the refund is filed within one year after the expiration date of the building permit or any extension of it.
§ 5.55.090 Accounting.

The City shall deposit, invest, account for, and expend the fees in accordance with this Chapter and Government Code section 66006.
§ 5.55.100 Appeals.

A developer may appeal to the City Manager any determination made under this Chapter. The developer must file an appeal within 15 days of the date of the determination. The appeal must be in writing, stating the reasons for the appeal. The City Manager shall set the matter for hearing within 45 days of the date of receipt by the City Clerk of notice of the appeal. In making a determination on the appeal, the City Manager shall follow the standards set forth in this Chapter. § 5.55.110 Supplementary Provisions.

It is the intent of the City Council that the fees required by this Chapter shall be supplementary to the fees, dedications or conditions imposed upon development under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, California Environmental Quality Act, and other state laws and City ordinances or policies which may authorize the imposition of fees, dedications or conditions.” SECTION 2. This updated Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance is exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), as the changes are administrative in nature and will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and Section 15061(b)(3) as CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this article is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council would have passed this ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption.

SECTION 5. Within fifteen days after the passage of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause a summary to be posted in the three places designated by resolution of the City Council.

Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 34 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill held on the 18th day of May, 2026.

ADOPTED and ordered posted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill, held on the 1st day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_______________________________
ZAC SHESS, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
LYONE P. CONNER, City Clerk
Item 9.3
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 35 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 1, 2026
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
TITLE: ACCEPT UPDATE ON CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY AND TRANSPAC

SYNOPSIS
TRANSPAC meets to provide direction to its staff and make recommendations to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) on significant transportation and land use issues. The attachments to this report include the CCTA Executive Summary and Board meeting minutes for January 21, 2026, February 18, 2026, and March 18, 2026, and the TRANSPAC Committee meeting minutes for December 11, 2025, February 12, 2026, and March 12, 2026.

DISCUSSION
Background
TRANSPAC was formed in 1986 to provide the cities of Central Contra Costa County a forum to discuss mutual planning and transportation issues. When Measure C, a countywide transportation proposition, was adopted in 1988, TRANSPAC became the official regional transportation, land use, and housing forum for Central Contra Costa County. The member agencies include Contra Costa County, Clayton, Concord, Martinez, Walnut Creek, and Pleasant Hill.

TRANSPAC meets to discuss transportation-related issues. A Councilmember and a Planning Commissioner represent each jurisdiction. The Chair of the CCTA then submits the actions.

Analysis
An Executive Summary of the actions taken on January 21, 2026, February 18, 2026, and March 18, 2026, at the CCTA Board meetings are included along with the meeting minutes. The actions taken at the TRANSPAC Committee meetings on December 11, 2025, February 12, 2026, and March 12, 2026, are included in the attached meeting minutes.

There is no item of discussion directly related to the City of Pleasant Hill with this update.

FISCAL IMPACT
None
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 36 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Accept the report.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
The City Council may want to discuss one or more of the actions taken during the last meeting.

Should the City Council require detailed information pertaining to any issues, a comprehensive report could be scheduled for a subsequent City Council meeting. Contingent on the amount of information required, staff would need adequate time to prepare a comprehensive report addressing the item or items.

ATTACHMENT(S)
CCTA Executive Summary and Board Meeting Minutes for January 21, 2026 CCTA Executive Summary and Board Meeting Minutes for February 18, 2026 CCTA Executive Summary and Board Meeting Minutes for March 18, 2026 TRANSPAC Meeting Minutes for December 11, 2025
TRANSPAC Meeting Minutes for February 12, 2026
TRANSPAC Meeting Minutes for March 12, 2026
Prepared by: Claire Voorhies, Administrative Analyst 1
Reviewed by: Ann James, Public Works Director
Approved by: Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 37 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

COMMISSIONERS
Aaron Meadows, Chair
Darlene Gee, Vice
Chair
Mark Armstrong
Newell Arnerich
Ron Bernal
Diane Burgis
Ken Carlson
Chris Kelley
Sue Noack
Carlyn Obringer
Rita Xavier
Timothy Haile,
Executive Director
2999 Oak Road
Suite 100
Walnut Creek
CA 94597
PHONE: 925.256.4700
FAX: 925.256.4701
www.ccta.net

MEMORANDUM
To: Matt Todd, TRANSPAC
Chris Weeks, SWAT
Robert Sarmiento, TRANSPLAN
Diane Friedmann, TVTC
John Nemeth, WCCTAC
Nate Levine, LPMC
From: Timothy Haile, Executive Director
Date: February 3, 2026
Re: Items of interest for circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs)
At its January 21, 2026 meeting, the Authority Board discussed and approved the following agenda item recommendations, which may be of interest to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees:

A. Staff provided an informational update on the Quarterly Project Status Report for October – December 2025.

B. Staff provided an informational update on the Quarterly Project Status Report for Transportation for Livable Communities and Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Trail Facilities projects for October – December 2025.

C. The Authority Board approved Resolution 26‐03‐P, which will award Construction Contract No. 728 to DC Electric Group, Inc. for the Town of Danville Intelligent Transportation Systems/Traffic Signal Modernization Project (Project). They are the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid in the amount of $204,187 for construction services for the Project, establish a total construction allotment amount of $235,602, which includes a 15% contingency; authorize the Executive Director or designee to shift funds between construction allotment categories as long as the total expenditures do not exceed the total amount for the construction allotment; for
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 38 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RTPC Memorandum
February 3, 2026

and authorize the Executive Director or designee to enter into agreements and execute purchase orders with various vendors for a total amount of $790,625, to procure equipment and software necessary to complete the Project.

D. The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Agreement No. 739 with Fehr & Peers in the amount of $4,935,255 to provide professional services for the development of the Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP), allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language, and approve Resolution 26‐04‐P, which appropriates $4,935,255 of Measure J Reserve Funds for the development of a new TEP.

E. The Authority Board approved staff to transmit an Annual Urban Limit Line Policy Advisory Letter to all Contra Costa County Jurisdictions. *To view the full meeting packet with additional agenda item information, please visit our meetings webpage here. Attachments to the Authority Board packet can be found in the Administration and Projects Committee and Planning Committee packets as referenced in the staff report.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 39 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
MEETING DATE: Wednesday, January 21, 2026
MINUTES PREPARED BY: Tarienne Grover
MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT:

Aaron Meadows, Chair
Darlene Gee, Vice Chair
Newell Arnerich, Commissioner
Ron Bernal, Commissioner
Diane Burgis, Commissioner
Ken Carlson, Commissioner
Chris Kelley, Commissioner
Sue Noack, Commissioner/MTC Rep.

Carlyn Obringer, Commissioner
Karen Stepper, Commissioner Alt.

Rita Xavier, Commissioner
Candace Andersen, Ex. Officio Rep.

Matthew Rinn, Ex. Officio Rep. Alt.

Amy Worth, Ex-Officio Rep.

Haleema Bharoocha
Colin Clarke
Andy Dillard
Danielle Elkins
Tarienne Grover
Timothy Haile
Jack Hall
Brandon Hays
Stephanie Hu
Lindy Johnson
Brian Kelleher
Matt Kelly
Ryan McClain
Hisham Noeimi
Emily Owen
Jackie Reyes
Sherri Sylva
Yuliana Tjeng
Jay Zhang
Amara Morrison, Legal Counsel
None

1. CONVENE MEETING: Aaron Meadows, Chair
DISCUSSION: Chair Meadows convened the meeting at 6:03 PM. Commissioner Armstrong was absent; Commissioner Alt. Stepper attended on his behalf. Rep. Foley was absent; Rep. Alt.

Rinn attended on his behalf.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public are invited to address the Authority regarding any item that is not listed on the agenda. Please refer to the Teleconferencing Special Notice for Public Comment guidelines.

DISCUSSION: There were no public comments on items not on the agenda.

4. PRESENTATIONS
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 40 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
January 21, 2026

CONSENT CALENDAR
ACTION: Commissioner Carlson moved to approve the consent calendar, seconded by Commissioner Noack. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None

5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Authority Board Minutes of December 17, 2025

6. Administration & Projects Committee - Consent:

A. Accept Monthly Accounts Payable Invoice Report for November 2025 Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the monthly accounts payable invoice report for November 2025.

B. Quarterly Project Status Report (QPSR) for October – December 2025 Recommendation: This is an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

C. Legislative Update
Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on legislation, along with addressing any questions that may arise. The Authority may take action on any item presented in the attachment or any State or Federal legislation pertaining to the Authority’s legislative program.

D. NEW ITEM: Accept Consultant Agreement Amendment
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 683 with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to extend the agreement termination date from January 17, 2026 to December 31, 2028, with no increase in budget.

7. Planning Committee - Consent:

A. Quarterly Project Status Report for Transportation for Livable Communities and Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Trail Facilities Projects for October – December 2025 Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 41 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
January 21, 2026

Recommendation: This is an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

B. Approval of Proposed Actions to Various Funding Resolutions Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 19-41-G (Rev 4), which will terminate the fully expended and reimbursed resolution with the City of Richmond for the 13th Street Complete Streets (Project 250002; formerly 120059), Resolution 23-01-G (Rev 1), which will extend the term of the resolution through June 30, 2027 with the City of El Cerrito for the El Cerrito del Norte Transit-Oriented Development Complete Streets Improvement (Project 250004), Resolution 23-07-G (Rev 1), which will terminate the fully expended and reimbursed resolution with the City of Richmond for the Lincoln Elementary Safe Routes to School Pedestrian Enhancements (Project 120062), Resolution 23-08-G (Rev 1), which will terminate the fully expended and reimbursed resolution with the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) for Point Pinole Park, Wildcat Creek Trail Rehabilitation, 2023 West County (Project 130032), and Resolution 24-01-G (Rev 1), which will terminate the fully expended and reimbursed resolution with the EBRPD for the Iron Horse Trail Rehabilitation (Alcosta Boulevard to Montevideo Drive), 2024 South County (Project 130033).

C. Approval of the City of Lafayette Calendar Years 2022 and 2023 Measure J Growth Management Program (GMP) Compliance Checklist
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the City of Lafayette GMP Compliance Checklist and payment of $576,309 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds to the City of Lafayette, with a second (offyear) payment of $589,757 in FY 2024-25 funds on the one-year anniversary of the first payment.

D. NEW ITEM: Development of the Bi-County Travel Model (Project) – Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 3 to Cooperative Agreement No. 18W.04 with Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) for a Time Extension Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 3 to Cooperative Agreement No. 18W.04 with Alameda CTC, allow additional time to complete the Project, and allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language. This amendment will extend the agreement termination date from December 31, 2025 to December 31, 2026.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS

8. Administration & Projects Committee - Regular:

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 42 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
January 21, 2026

A. NEW ITEM: Town of Danville Intelligent Transportation Systems/Traffic Signal Modernization (Project 31008) (Project) – Approval to Award Construction Contract No. 728 with DC Electric Group, Inc. for Construction Services, and Authorization for the Executive Director or Designee to Enter into Agreements and Execute Purchase Orders with Various Vendors to Procure Equipment and Software Necessary to Complete the Project
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 26-03-P, which will award Construction Contract No. 728 to DC Electric Group, Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid in the amount of $204,187 for construction services for the Project, establish a total construction allotment amount of $235,602, which includes a 15% contingency; authorize the Executive Director or designee to shift funds between construction allotment categories as long as the total expenditures do not exceed the total amount for the construction allotment; and authorize the Executive Director or designee to enter into agreements and execute purchase orders with various vendors for a total amount of $790,625, to procure equipment and software necessary to complete the Project.

ACTION: Commissioner Arnerich moved to approve Resolution 26-03-P, which will award Construction Contract No. 728 to DC Electric Group, Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid in the amount of $204,187 for construction services for the Town of Danville Intelligent Transportation Systems/Traffic Signal Modernization (Project 31008) (Project), establish a total construction allotment amount of $235,602, which includes a 15% contingency, authorize the Executive Director or designee to shift funds between construction allotment categories as long as the total expenditures do not exceed the total amount for the construction allotment, and authorize the Executive Director or designee to enter into agreements and execute purchase orders with various vendors for a total amount of $790,625, to procure equipment and software necessary to complete the Project, seconded by Commissioner Obringer. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Andrew Dillard, Senior Engineer, provided a background and overview of the project, discussed the SMART signal improvements, advertisement schedule, bidding process, procurement process for the equipment and software, and the overall schedule with anticipated construction, systems integration, and closeout by Fall 2026.

Commissioners and representatives provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners and representatives.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 43 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
January 21, 2026

Public Comment:

Bruce Ohlson, Bike East Bay
B. NEW ITEM: Award Agreement for Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) Development Support
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Authority Board authorize the Chair to execute Agreement No. 739 with Fehr & Peers in the amount of $4,935,255 to provide professional services for the development of the TEP, allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language, and approve Resolution 26-04-P, which appropriates $4,935,255 of Measure J Reserve Funds for the development of a new TEP.

ACTION: Commissioner Bernal moved to authorize the Chair to execute Agreement No. 739 with Fehr & Peers in the amount of $4,935,255 to provide professional services for the development of the Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP), allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language, and approve Resolution 26-04-P, which appropriates $4,935,255 of Measure J Reserve Funds for the development of a new TEP, seconded by Commissioner Arnerich. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, provided a background and overview of the procurement process, agreement negotiations and terms, primary consultant and subconsultant overview, roles, and responsibilities, scope and deliverables including reviewing the governance and the role of the Authority, communications strategy, policy documentations, associated ordinances and implementation guides, performance criteria and tools, and development of the TEP, with a final TEP to be brought to the Authority Board for consideration in November 2027. Mr. Haile discussed the coalition building and support that will be required from the local jurisdictions and Contra Costa County, the intent to fund the agreement with earned interest on the Measure J Reserve program, and the next steps, which include identifying the need and costs for legal support and the costs to place a measure on the ballot.

Commissioners and representatives provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners and representatives.

9. Planning Committee - Regular:

A. Approval to Issue an Annual Urban Limit Line (ULL) Policy Advisory Letter to all Contra Costa County Jurisdictions
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 44 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
January 21, 2026

Recommendation: Staff seeks approval to transmit an Annual ULL Policy Advisory Letter to all Contra Costa County jurisdictions.

ACTION: Commissioner Burgis moved to authorize staff to transmit an Annual Urban Limit Line Policy Advisory Letter to all Contra Costa County jurisdictions, seconded by Commissioner Obringer. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Matt Kelly, Director, Planning, provided a background and overview of the ULL, Measure J Growth Management Program requirements, adopted ULLs, annual ULL Policy Advisory Letters, criteria for assessing ULL compliance, and provided an update on Contra Costa County’s Measure L ULL map and proposed extension through December 31, 2051, which is proposed for the June 2026 ballot.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

10. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS

11. ASSOCIATED COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Central County (TRANSPAC): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on December 11, 2025
B. East County (TRANSPLAN): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on December 11, 2025, and Notice of Cancellation for the regular meeting on January 8, 2026 C. Southwest County (SWAT): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on January 5, 2026 (Meeting handout if available)
D. West County (WCCTAC): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on December 12, 2025

12. AUTHORITY BOARD AND STAFF COMMENTS
A. Chair's Comments and Reports
DISCUSSION: Chair Meadows thanked Commissioner Bernal for his service on the Authority Board over the past year.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 45 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
January 21, 2026

B. Commissioners' and Ex-Officio Representatives’ Comments and Reports on Activities and Meetings
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Bernal thanked the Authority Board and staff and made outgoing remarks.

Commissioner Kelley reported that she and Rep. Andersen attended an East Bay Economic Alliance tour of the Zoox facility in the City of Hayward.

Rep. Alt. Rinn provided an update on the completion of the Fare Gates project, Tap to Ride project, pilot program with Uber and discussions with other Transportation Network Companies, and the Bay Area Rapid Transit’s Trip Planner app.

Rep. Noack provided an update on the Transit-Oriented Communities Policy, and the Citizens Initiative with signature gathering kicking off this Friday, January 23, 2026.

C. Executive Staff Comments
DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, provided an update on the Authority’s domain name change, announced a grant award from the California Public Utilities Commission for the east and west Contra Costa County broadband expansion project for underserved communities, Safe Streets for All grant award for a pilot project to test communications between emergency vehicles and connected autonomous vehicles, and staff presentations and meeting with the Secretary’s office during the Transportation Research Board annual meeting from January 11-15, 2026. Mr. Haile announced the end of the Automated Driving System pilot programs with an item to come to the Authority Board in the spring to provide an update, and the upcoming Redefining Mobility Summit on June 16, 2026 and demonstration day on June 17, 2026, in addition to a delegation from the Netherlands during the week of June 15th, which will focus on air mobility.

13. CALENDAR
A. January, February, March and April 2026
B. Calendar of Upcoming Events

14. ADJOURNMENT to the next regular meeting proposed for February 18, 2026 at 6:00 PM.

DISCUSSION: The meeting was adjourned at 7:43 PM.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 46 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

COMMISSIONERS
Darlene Gee, Chair
Sue Noack, Vice Chair
Mark Armstrong
Newell Arnerich
Juan Banales
Diane Burgis
Ken Carlson
Chris Kelley
Aaron Meadows
Carlyn Obringer
Rita Xavier
Timothy Haile,
Executive Director
2999 Oak Road
Suite 100
Walnut Creek
CA 94597
PHONE: 925.256.4700
FAX: 925.256.4701
www.ccta.net

MEMORANDUM
To: Matt Todd, TRANSPAC
Chris Weeks, SWAT
Robert Sarmiento, TRANSPLAN
Diane Friedmann, TVTC
John Nemeth, WCCTAC
Nate Levine, LPMC
From: Timothy Haile, Executive
Director Date: March 11, 2026
Re: Items of interest for circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs)
At its February 18, 2026 meeting, the Authority Board discussed and approved the following agenda item recommendations, which may be of interest to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees:

A. The Authority Board approved the proposed 2026 State and Federal advocacy programs for the Authority.

B. The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Cooperative Agreement No. 90.80.11 with the California Department of Transportations in the amount not-to-exceed $596,850 for Northbound Interstate 680 Express Lane Completion (Project 8009.02) oversight services of the 30% design and allowed the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.

C. The Authority Board nominated and appointed Karen Mitchoff as the Authority Board Representative to serve as a non-voting Ex-Officio advisory member on the Authority’s Accessibility Advisory (AAC) Committee.

D. The Authority Board approved appointments to the AAC for four Public for
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 47 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RTPC Memorandum
March 11, 2026

Transit Rider primary representatives and optional alternates to the AAC, following approval by a majority vote of the AAC, finalized and confirmed the AAC nominations and appointed nominees to the AAC in accordance with the AAC Bylaws, and adopted Resolution 25-06-A to dissolve the Paratransit Coordinating Council.

E. Staff provided an update on the operations at GoMentum Station as we approach the two-year mark of operations by the Authority and Next Generations Mobility, including an update on financial obligations.

F. The Authority Board approved Resolution 26-05-P to award Construction Contract No. 737 to DC Electric Group, Inc. in the amount of $446,947 to establish a told construction allotment of $513,989.05, including a %15 contingency, and authorized the Executive Director or designee to shift funds within the allotment without exceeding the total amount, authorized the execution of agreements and purchase orders with various vendors in an amount not-to-exceed $598,776.25 for required equipment and software, including a 15% contingency, and authorized the use of $83,832.70 in remaining construction funds, and any additional project savings, for authority staff time, construction management and optional signal timing implementation.

G. Staff provided an update on the Transportation Expenditure Plan development.

H. The Authority Board provided a letter to Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) dated February 10, 2026 regarding Contra Costa County considerations in future BART service scenarios.
*To view the full meeting packet with additional agenda item information, please visit our meetings webpage here. Attachments to the Authority Board packet can be found in the Administration and Projects Committee and Planning Committee packets as referenced in the staff report.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 48 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
MEETING DATE: Wednesday, February 18, 2026
MINUTES PREPARED BY: Tarienne Grover
MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT:

Aaron Meadows, Chair
Darlene Gee, Vice Chair
Mark Armstrong, Commissioner
Newell Arnerich, Commissioner
Juan Banales, Commissioner
Diane Burgis, Commissioner
Ken Carlson, Commissioner
Chris Kelley, Commissioner
Sue Noack, Commissioner /MTC Rep.

Carlyn Obringer, Commissioner
Rita Xavier, Commissioner
Mark Foley, Ex-Officio Rep.

Amy Worth, Ex-Officio Rep.

Haleema Bharoocha
Colin Clarke
Andy Dillard
Danielle Elkins
Tarienne Grover
Timothy Haile
Jack Hall
Brandon Hays
Stephanie Hu
Lindy Johnson
Brian Kelleher
Matt Kelly
Ryan McClain
Hisham Noeimi
Emily Owen
Sherri Sylva
Yuliana Tjeng
Jay Zhang
Lindsay D'Andrea, Legal Counsel
Candace Andersen, Ex. Officio Rep.

1. CONVENE MEETING: Aaron Meadows, Chair
DISCUSSION: Chair Meadows convened the meeting at 6:03 PM. Rep. Andersen was absent.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public are invited to address the Authority regarding any item that is not listed on the agenda. Please refer to the Teleconferencing Special Notice for Public Comment guidelines.

DISCUSSION: There were no public comments on items not on the agenda.

4. ELECTION
A. Election of Chair and Vice Chair for 2026
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 49 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 18, 2026

ACTION: Commissioner Kelley moved to nominate and appoint Vice Chair Gee as Chair and Commissioner Noack as Vice Chair for 2026, seconded by Commissioner Arnerich. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Kelley made the nominations, which were seconded by Commissioner Arnerich. There were no additional nominations made.

5. COMMENDATIONS
A. Outgoing Chair Aaron Meadows
DISCUSSION: Incoming Chair Gee provided remarks and presented a commendation and plaque to outgoing Chair Meadows. Commissioners, Representatives, and staff provided remarks to outgoing Chair Meadows.

Outgoing Chair Meadows provided outgoing chair remarks.

6. COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
A. Assignment of Authority Board Members to the Administration and Projects Committee and Planning Committee
ACTION: Commissioner Burgis moved to assign Chair Gee, Vice Chair Noack, and Commissioners Arnerich, Banales, and Kelley to the Administration and Projects Committee and Commissioners Armstrong, Carlson, Meadows, Obringer, and Xavier to the Planning Committee, with Commissioner Burgis unassigned to either committee, seconded by Commissioner Meadows. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Xavier requested to switch with Commissioner Kelley from the Administration and Projects Committee to the Planning Committee.

Commissioner Kelley agreed to switch committees.

Commissioner Armstrong requested to switch with Chair Gee from the Planning Committee to the Administration and Projects Committee, but after a brief discussion, agreed to stay on the Planning Committee.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 50 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 18, 2026

7. PRESENTATIONS

CONSENT CALENDAR
ACTION: Commissioner Carlson moved to approve the consent calendar, seconded by Commissioner Obringer. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Tarienne Grover, Director, Administrative Services, announced that there is a handout for Consent Calendar Item 10C to adjust the total allocation amount from $5,725,040 to $5,726,474.

8. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Authority Board Minutes of January 21, 2026

9. Administration & Projects Committee - Consent:

A. Authorization to Renew the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) Subscription with Governmentjobs.com, Inc. (D/B/A/NEOGOV) (NEOGOV) to Provide Software for Onboarding, Recruitment, and Advertising Services, Maintenance, and Customer Support Services
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization to renew the SaaS subscription with NEOGOV in the amount of $10,591.42, to provide software for onboarding, recruitment, and advertising services, maintenance, and customer support services, extend the subscription for another year through March 13, 2027, and allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.

B. Accept Annual Measure J Compliance Audits for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025
Recommendation: Staff seek acceptance of the Measure J compliance audits for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.

C. Accept Quarterly Sales Tax Revenue Report for the Period Ended September 30, 2025
Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the quarterly sales tax revenue report for the period ended September 30, 2025.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 51 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 18, 2026

D. Accept Annual Single Audit for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the Single Audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.

E. Accept Monthly Accounts Payable Invoice Report for December 2025 Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the monthly accounts payable invoice report for December 2025.

F. Accept Quarterly Cash and Investment Report for the Period Ended December 31, 2025
Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the quarterly cash and investment report for the period ended December 31, 2025.

G. Legislative Update
Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on legislation, along with addressing any questions that may arise. The Authority may take action on any item presented in the attachment or any State or Federal legislation pertaining to the Authority’s legislative program.

H. Approval of Proposed 2026 State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Platforms Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the proposed 2026 State and Federal advocacy programs for the Authority.

I. NEW ITEM: Authorization to Execute Agreement No. 741 with eScribe to Provide Audio Live Streaming, Real-Time Meeting Management, Minutes Automation, Customer Support Services, Implementation, Training, and an Automated Agenda Workflow System (AAWS)
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Agreement No. 741 with eScribe in the amount of $58,445.31 which includes a $5,000 contingency, for audio live streaming, real-time meeting management, minutes automation, customer support services, implementation, training and an AAWS for a three-year term from March 1, 2026 through March 1, 2029, and allows the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.

J. NEW ITEM: Innovate 680 – Northbound Interstate 680 Express Lane Completion (Project 8009.02) – Authorization to Execute Cooperative Agreement No. 90.80.11 with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for Development of 30% Design
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 52 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 18, 2026

Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Cooperative Agreement No. 90.80.11 with Caltrans in an amount not-to-exceed $596,850 for oversight services of the 30% design and allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.

K. NEW ITEM: Update Total Agreement Value of Agreement No. 451 with Mark Watts Advocacy, LLC, now Dodd and Chaaban Strategies LLC, for State Advocacy Services Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization to update the total agreement value of Agreement No. 451 between the Authority and Dodd and Chaaban Strategies LLC, for a new total agreement value of $528,000, to provide state advocacy services.

10. Planning Committee - Consent:

A. Approval of the City of Pinole Calendar Years 2022 and 2023 Measure J Growth Management Program (GMP) Compliance Checklist
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the City of Pinole GMP Compliance Checklist and payment of $459,840 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds to the City of Pinole, with a second (off-year) payment of $468,830 in FY 2024-25 funds on the one-year anniversary of the first payment.

B. Approval of the City of Walnut Creek Calendar Years 2022 and 2023 Measure J Growth Management Program (GMP) Compliance Checklist
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the City of Walnut Creek GMP Compliance Checklist and payment of $1,264,433 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds to the City of Walnut Creek, with a second (off-year) payment of $1,295,660 in FY 2024-25 funds on the one-year anniversary of the first payment.

C. NEW ITEM: Approval of Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27 Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) 40% Fund Expenditure Plan
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 26-08-G, incorporating the Authority’s FY 2026-27 TFCA 40% Fund Expenditure Plan and allocation of the TFCA 40% funds in the amount of $5,726,474, and authorization for the Executive Director or designee to sign and submit the Expenditure Plan Summary application to the Bay Area Air District.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS

11. Administration & Projects Committee - Regular:

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 53 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 18, 2026

A. NEW ITEM: Appointment of Authority Board Representative to the Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC)
Recommendation: Staff requests that the Authority Board nominate one (1) eligible Authority Board Representative to serve as a non-voting Ex-Officio advisory member on the Authority’s AAC.

ACTION: Commissioner Carlson moved to nominate and appoint Karen Mitchoff as the Authority Board Representative to serve as a non-voting Ex-Officio advisory member on the Authority’s Accessibility Advisory Committee, seconded by Commissioner Burgis. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Haleema Bharoocha, Programs Manager, provided a brief overview of the requirements for the Authority Board representative to the AAC, which will be a non-voting Ex-Officio representative who is not an elected official and does not serve on a transit agency board.

Commissioner Carlson nominated Karen Mitchoff, which was seconded by Commissioner Burgis. There were no additional nominations made, but there was confirmation that Karen Mitchoff agreed to serve on the AAC.

B. Appointments to the Authority’s Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) Recommendation: Staff seeks approval from the Authority Board to confirm the appointment of four (4) Public Transit Rider primary representatives and optional alternates to the AAC, following approval by a majority vote of the AAC, finalize and confirm the AAC nominations and appoint nominees to the AAC in accordance with the AAC Bylaws, and adopt Resolution 26-06-A to dissolve the Paratransit Coordinating Council.

ACTION: Commissioner Arnerich moved to finalize and confirm the nominations and appointment of Loran Shlevin and Robert Sanders for the primary Public Transit Rider seats representing Older Adults and Sarah Birdwell and Bryan Harris for the primary Public Transit Rider seats representing Persons with Disabilities, as well as Rebekah McMenami as the alternate Public Transit Rider representing Persons with Disabilities; Choice in Aging, Developmental Disabilities Council, Contra Costa Health, Independent Living Resources of Solano and Contra Costa Counties, as the primary agencies representing Social Service Agencies and Mobility Matters and the City of San Pablo as the primary agencies representing Human Service Transportation Providers, and the City of Walnut Creek as an alternate provider, as well as the Public Transit Operators, Metropolitan Transportation Commission representative, Contra Costa County representative, and the Authority Board representative to the Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) in accordance with Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 54 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 18, 2026

the AAC Bylaws, following approval by a majority vote of the AAC, and adopt Resolution 26-06-A to dissolve the Paratransit Coordinating Council, seconded by Commissioner Xavier. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Haleema Bharoocha, Programs Manager, provided an overview of the AAC nominations, including the Social Service Agencies, Human Service Transportation Providers, Transit Operators, Public Transit Riders, Contra Costa County representative, and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission representative, as well as the Authority Board representative appointment made under the prior item, requested confirmation of the nominations to the AAC and approval to formally dissolve the Paratransit Coordinating Council.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

C. Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Program – Update on GoMentum Station Operations
Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on the operations at GoMentum Station as we approach the two-year mark of operations by the Authority and Next Generation Mobility, including an update on financial obligations. This is an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

DISCUSSION: Ryan McClain, Deputy Executive Director, Projects and Operations, discussed the goals and objectives of the program, technologies being tested, a financial overview for 2024 and 2025 including a summary of payments to the Authority, progress report of the Fund Exchange Reserve loan, five-year financial projection, overview of the utilization since April 2024, marketing plan for 2026 focusing on proactive growth, and provided an overview of the Transit Bus on Shoulder Testing and Training project at GoMentum Station.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

D. NEW ITEM: City of Concord Intelligent Transportation Systems/Traffic Signal Modernization (Project 31007) (Project) – Approval to Award Construction Contract No. 737 with DC Electric Group, Inc. for Construction Services, and Authorization for the Executive Director or Designee to Enter into Agreements and Execute Purchase Orders with Various Vendors to Procure Equipment and Software Necessary to Complete the Project
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 55 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 18, 2026

Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 26-05-P to award Construction Contract No. 737 to DC Electric Group, Inc. in the amount of $446,947, establish a total construction allotment of $513,989.05, including a 15% contingency, authorize the Executive Director or designee to shift funds within the allotment without exceeding the total amount, authorize execution of agreements and purchase orders with various vendors in an amount not-to-exceed $598,776.25 for required equipment and software, including a 15% contingency, and authorize the use of $83,832.70 in remaining construction funds, and any additional project savings, for authority staff time, construction management, and optional signal timing implementation.

ACTION: Commissioner Obringer moved to approve Resolution 26-05-P to award Construction Contract No. 737 to DC Electric Group, Inc. in the amount of $446,947, establish a total construction allotment of $513,989.05, including a 15% contingency, authorize the Executive Director or designee to shift funds within the allotment without exceeding the total amount, authorize execution of agreements and purchase orders with various vendors in an amount not-to-exceed $598,776.25 for required equipment and software, including a 15% contingency, and authorize the use of $83,832.70 in remaining construction funds, and any additional project savings, for authority staff time, construction management, and optional signal timing implementation, seconded by Commissioner Carlson. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Jay Zhang, Associate Engineer, provided a background and overview of the project, discussed the project benefits, project area map, overview of SMART Signals improvements, advertisement schedule with construction anticipated to start in April 2026, the bidding process, and an overview of the procurement of equipment and software.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

12. Planning Committee - Regular: None

13. Transportation Expenditure Plan - Regular:

A. NEW ITEM: Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) Development Update Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on the development of a TEP. This is an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 56 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 18, 2026

DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, provided a background and overview of the engagement process, announced the special proposed meetings and/or workshops for the third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 PM, discussed the key objectives and principles for the TEP, and the process timeline, including TEP framework and development, policy and guidance, and engagement.

Commissioners and representatives provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners and representatives.

14. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter to the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) dated February 10, 2026 RE: Contra Costa County Considerations in Future BART Service Scenarios

15. ASSOCIATED COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Central County (TRANSPAC): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on February 12, 2026 (Meeting handout if available)
B. East County (TRANSPLAN): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on February 12, 2026 (Meeting handout if available)
C. Southwest County (SWAT): Notice of Cancellation for the regular meeting on February 2, 2026
D. West County (WCCTAC): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on January 23, 2026 (Meeting handout if available)

16. AUTHORITY BOARD AND STAFF COMMENTS
A. Chair's Comments and Reports
DISCUSSION: Chair Gee made incoming chair remarks.

B. Commissioners' and Ex-Officio Representatives’ Comments and Reports on Activities and Meetings
DISCUSSION: Rep. Foley provided an update on the Bay Area Rapid Transit’s (BART) Workshop held on February 12, 2026, which included an updated Alternative Service Framework with no proposed station closures during the initial phase, optional closures as part of the second phase, and announced that the BART Board will make the decisions on the potential station closures instead of the General Manager.

Rep. Worth announced that the Contra Costa County bus operators were present and engaged at BART’s workshop.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 57 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
February 18, 2026

Rep. Noack provided an update on the Transit-Oriented Communities Policy with the intent to finalize the policy at the upcoming meeting, discussed rent stabilization as a big area of concern in the policy, and announced that there will be a separate call for projects forecasted for 18 months.

C. Executive Staff Comments
DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, thanked Tarienne Grover, Director, Administrative Services, for 10 years of service to the Authority, announced Government Communicators Day, and thanked Lindy Johnson, Director, External Affairs, and Michael Blasky, Community Engagement Specialist, for their communications efforts, thanked all the Authority staff for their hard work and efforts, and provided an update on the Bay Area Rapid Transit letter in the packet.

17. CALENDAR
A. February, March, April, and May 2026
B. Calendar of Upcoming Events

18. CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Section 54956.9) Brosamer and Wall, Inc. v. Contra Costa Transportation Authority, et al., Case No.

C25-00955
DISCUSSION: Commissioners, staff, and legal counsel convened in Closed Session at 8:55 PM.

19. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. Report on Action Taken in Closed Session
DISCUSSION: Commissioners, staff, and legal counsel reconvened in Open Session at 9:15 PM. Lindsay D’Andrea, legal counsel, announced that there is no reportable action.

20. ADJOURNMENT to the next regular meeting proposed for March 18, 2026 at 6:00 PM.

DISCUSSION: The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 PM.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 58 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

COMMISSIONERS
Darlene Gee, Chair
Sue Noack, Vice Chair
Mark Armstrong
Newell Arnerich
Juan Banales
Diane Burgis
Ken Carlson
Chris Kelley
Aaron Meadows
Carlyn Obringer
Rita Xavier
Timothy Haile,
Executive Director
2999 Oak Road
Suite 100
Walnut Creek
CA 94597
PHONE: 925.256.4700
FAX: 925.256.4701
www.ccta.net

MEMORANDUM
To: Matt Todd, TRANSPAC
Chris Weeks, SWAT
Robert Sarmiento, TRANSPLAN
Diane Friedmann, TVTC
John Nemeth, WCCTAC
Nate Levine, LPMC
From: Timothy Haile, Executive Director
Date: April 8, 2026
Re: Items of interest for circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs)
At its March 18, 2026 meeting, the Authority Board discussed and approved the following agenda item recommendations, which may be of interest to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees:

A. The Authority Board approved Resolution 26-10-P which will appropriate $3,691,000 in Measure J Program 24 funds to the Town of Danville for the construction phase of the Diablo Road Trail Project (Project 24035).

B. The Authority Board approved Resolution 26-11-P which appropriates $1,180,000 in Fiscal Year 2022 earmark funds to the City of Pittsburg, governing administration of the federal earmark for the Pittsburg Center Smart City Pilot Project, authorizing up to $20,000 for Authority administrative costs, and allowing the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.

C. Staff provided a status update on the approved Planning Department Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

D. The Authority Board approved the release of Request for Proposals 26-01 for professional services for the development of the study for the Model for
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 59 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RTPC Memorandum
April 8, 2026

Agreement and Ordinance for a Countywide Micromobility Operations Program Study with a budget not-to-exceed $150,000.

E. The Authority Board approved Resolution 26-07-G appropriating $13,402.54 of previously allocated Measure J Program 17 funds to the City of Martinez in Central Contra Costa County for the installation of publicly available bike parking for the Commute Alternatives Program (Program 17).

F. The Authority Board approved Resolution 26-12-G supporting East Contra Costa Transit Authority, dba Tri Delta’s reallocation request for the Regional Measure 3 (RM3) funds in the amount of $6,589,404 from the Bus Replacement and Hydrogen Fueling Station to the Facility Rehabilitation and Vehicle Replacements, and authorizing staff to forward the resolution and revised recommendation to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for the North Bay Access Transit Improvements.

G. The Authority Board approved Resolution 26-09-P which authorized the Executive Director to 1) approve the Project design in accordance with Government Code Section 830.6 to preserve design immunity, 2) publicly advertise the construction contract at the Executive Director or designee’s discretion, 3) approve changes and issue addenda to the bidding documents during the advertisement period and 4) publicly open all bids received for the Countywide Smart Signals Project (Project 31000).

H. The Authority Board approved Resolution 26-12-A (Rev 1) which will update changes to the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Midyear Budget for the Authority and Congestion Management Agency.

I. Staff presented an overview summary of consultant cost for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

J. Staff provided an update on MTC’s One Bay Area Grant Cycle 4 and related policies, and funding programs recently adopted by MTC.

K. Staff provided an update on the development of the Transportation Expenditure Plan development
*To view the full meeting packet with additional agenda item information, please visit our meetings webpage here. Attachments to the Authority Board packet can be found in the Administration and Projects Committee and Planning Committee packets as referenced in the staff report.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 60 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
MEETING DATE: Wednesday, March 18, 2026
MINUTES PREPARED BY: Tarienne Grover
MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT:

Darlene Gee, Chair
Sue Noack, Vice Chair/MTC Rep.

Mark Armstrong, Commissioner
Newell Arnerich, Commissioner
Juan Banales, Commissioner
Diane Burgis, Commissioner
Ken Carlson, Commissioner
Chris Kelley, Commissioner
Aaron Meadows, Commissioner
Carlyn Obringer, Commissioner
Rita Xavier, Commissioner
Amy Worth, Ex-Officio Rep.

Haleema Bharoocha
Michael Blasky
Colin Clarke
Andy Dillard
Danielle Elkins
Tarienne Grover
Timothy Haile
Jack Hall
Brandon Hays
Lindy Johnson
Brian Kelleher
Matt Kelly
Erika Kiernan
Ryan McClain
Hisham Noeimi
Yuliana Tjeng
Jay Zhang
Amara Morrison, Legal Counsel
Candace Andersen, Ex. Officio Rep.

Mark Foley, Ex-Officio Rep.

1. CONVENE MEETING: Darlene Gee, Chair
DISCUSSION: Chair Gee convened the meeting at 6:02 PM. Reps. Andersen and Foley were absent. Commissioner Carlson had not yet arrived.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public are invited to address the Authority regarding any item that is not listed on the agenda. Please refer to the Teleconferencing Special Notice for Public Comment guidelines.

DISCUSSION: A public comment was provided by Bruce Ohlson.

Commissioner Carlson arrived at 6:08 PM.

4. PRESENTATIONS
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 61 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 18, 2026

CONSENT CALENDAR
ACTION: Commissioner Obringer moved to approve the consent calendar, seconded by Commissioner Kelley. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None

5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Authority Board Minutes of February 18, 2026

6. Administration & Projects Committee - Consent:

A. Accept Internal Accounting Report for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2025 Recommendation: Staff seek acceptance of the internal accounting report for the six months ended December 31, 2025.

B. Accept Monthly Accounts Payable Invoice Report for January 2026 Recommendation: Staff seeks acceptance of the monthly accounts payable invoice report for January 2026.

C. Town of Danville (Town) – Diablo Road Trail Project (Project 24035) (Project) – Approval to Appropriate Measure J Funds for Construction Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 26-10-P, which will appropriate $3,691,000 in Measure J Program 24 funds to the Town for the construction phase of the Project.

D. Pittsburg Center Smart City Pilot Project (Project) – Approval of Appropriation to the City of Pittsburg (City) Governing Administration of the Federal Earmark for the Project
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 26-11-P, which appropriates $1,180,000 in Fiscal Year 2022 earmark funds to the City, authorizes up to $20,000 for Authority administrative costs, and allows the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.

Innovate 680 – Automated Driving System (Project 8009.07) – Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 560 with Advanced Mobility Group (AMG) to Provide Systems Integration, Data Management, and Amazon Web Services (AWS) Storage Services
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 62 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 18, 2026

Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 560 with AMG in the amount of $342,000, for a new total agreement value of $5,686,536, to provide additional project and systems management services, extend the agreement termination date to June 30, 2031 to accommodate the required data retention period, and allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.

E. Approval of Proposed Actions to Various Funding Resolutions Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 17-22-P (Rev 5), which will extend the term to December 31, 2027, with the City of Martinez for the Martinez Intermodal Station Project Phase 3 (Project #27001) for the construction of on-site parking lot improvements (259 parking spaces), construction management, contract administration, surveying & staking, testing, and staff charges.

F. Richmond Street Complete Streets Improvements (Project 31004) – Amendment No. 1 to Cooperative Agreement No. 665 with the City of El Cerrito (City) Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 1 to Cooperative Agreement No. 665 with the City, and to authorize the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.

G. Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 442 with Endsight for Information Technology (IT) Support and Services
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 442 with Endsight in the amount of $350,000, for a new total agreement value of $1,260,000, to provide IT support and services required for the Authority’s computer and server network, and extend the term from June 30, 2027 to December 31, 2028.

H. Legislative Update
Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on legislation, along with addressing any questions that may arise. The Authority may take action on any item presented in the attachment or any State or Federal legislation pertaining to the Authority’s legislative program.

I. NEW ITEM: Interstate 680/State Route 4 Interchange Improvements, Phases 2A and 4 (Project 6001B) (Project) – Authorization to Execute Various Utility Agreements to Relocate Utilities in Conflict with the Project
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 662 with San Pablo Bay Pipeline Company, an affiliate of Crimson Pipeline, LLC; Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 633 with Central Contra Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 63 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 18, 2026

Costa Sanitary District to reflect language required by the California Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration; Agreement No. 751 with Pacific Gas & Electric in the amount not-to-exceed $749,228 to prepare the design and relocate the electric power pole as needed; and Agreement No. 752 with Contra Costa Water District in the amount of $50,000; and allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.

J. NEW ITEM: Interstate 680/State Route 4 Interchange Improvements, Phases 2A and 4 (Project 6001B) – Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 692 with Contra Costa County Public Works Department (County) for Fee-forServices Related to Right-of-Way (ROW) Acquisition Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 692 with the County in the amount of $350,000, for a new total agreement value of $670,000, to provide ROW services and pay the acquisition fees, and allow the Executive Director or designee to make any nonsubstantive changes to the language.

K. NEW ITEM: Interstate 680/State Route 4 Interchange Improvements, Phases 2A and 4 (Project 6001B) – Authorize the Executive Director to Execute Right of Entry with the California Department of General Services
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Executive Director or designee to execute a Right of Entry License and Transfer Agreement (Agreement) with the California Department of General Services in an amount not-to-exceed $90,000, and delegate authority to the Executive Director or designee to execute additional documents and amendments related to this Agreement. If an amendment to this Agreement requires additional funding, the Executive Director shall seek authorization and approval from the Executive Committee of the Authority.

7. Planning Committee - Consent:

A. Approval of the City of Richmond Calendar Years 2022 and 2023 Measure J Growth Management Program (GMP) Compliance Checklist
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of the City of Richmond GMP Compliance Checklist and payment of $2,114,316 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds to the City of Richmond, with a second (offyear) payment of FY 2024-25 funds in the amount of $2,168,243 on the one-year anniversary of the first payment.

B. Planning Department Work Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Status Update Recommendation: Staff will provide a status update on the approved Planning Department Work Plan for FY 2025-26. This is an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 64 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 18, 2026

C. Model Agreement and Ordinance for a Countywide Micromobility Operations Program Study (Study) – Approval to Release Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 26-01 for Professional Services for Development of the Study
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval to release RFP No. 26-01 for consultant support for the Study, with a budget not-to-exceed $150,000.

D. NEW ITEM: Commute Alternatives Program (Program 17) – Approval of Appropriation Request in Central Contra Costa County
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 26-07-G appropriating $13,402.54 of previously allocated Measure J Program 17 funds to the City of Martinez for the installation of publicly available bike parking.

E. NEW ITEM: Approval of Resolution 26-12-G to Reallocate Regional Measure 3 (RM3) Funds from the North Bay Access Transit Improvements – Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority, dba Tri Delta Transit Bus Replacement and Hydrogen Fueling Station to Facility Rehabilitation and Vehicle Replacements Recommendation: Staff seeks approval to recommend that the Authority Board approve Resolution 26-12-G supporting Tri Delta Transit’s reallocation request for RM3 funds in the amount of $6,589,404 from bus replacement and a hydrogen fueling station to facility rehabilitation and vehicle replacements, and forward the resolution and revised recommendation to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

F. NEW ITEM: Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 02 to Agreement No. ARV-20- 008 with the California Energy Commission (CEC) to Modify the Scope and Budget Allocation Between Categories
Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Executive Director or designee to execute Amendment No. 02 and any related amendments to Agreement No.

ARV-20-008 with the CEC to modify the scope and budget allocation between categories, extend the term from March 31, 2026 to September 30, 2027, and allow the Executive Director or designee to enter into necessary amendments with the Community Choice Aggregator previously named Marin Clean Energy and Advanced Mobility Group.

G. NEW ITEM: Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) – Authorization to Execute Amendment No. 3 to Master Cooperative Agreement No. 510-04 With Marin Clean Energy (MCE) for the Purpose of Retaining the Services of Subcontractor to Provide Project Implementation Related to Public Outreach and Managing the Installation of EVSE for the California Energy Commission Grant ARV-20-008 Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 65 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 18, 2026

Recommendation: Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to execute Amendment No. 3 to Master Cooperative Agreement No. 510-04 with MCE, to extend the agreement termination date from March 31, 2026 to December 31, 2026, with no increase in budget.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS

8. Administration & Projects Committee - Regular:

A. Countywide Smart Signals Project (Project 31000) (Project) – Approval of Plans, Specifications and Estimate for Construction and to Advertise for Bids Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 26-09-P, which will authorize the Executive Director to 1) approve the Project design in accordance with Government Code Section 830.6 to preserve design immunity, 2) publicly advertise the construction contract at the Executive Director or designee’s discretion, 3) approve changes and issue addenda to the bidding documents during the advertisement period, and 4) publicly open all bids received.

ACTION: Commissioner Arnerich moved to approve Resolution 26-09-P, which will authorize the Executive Director to 1) approve the Project design in accordance with Government Code Section 830.6 to preserve design immunity, 2) publicly advertise the construction contract at the Executive Director or designee’s discretion, 3) approve changes and issue addenda to the bidding documents during the advertisement period, and 4) publicly open all bids received, seconded by Vice Chair Noack. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Andy Dillard, Senior Engineer, provided a background and overview of the project, scope, budget, stakeholder outreach, bidding process, the equipment procurement process, evaluation of technology, status of the Plans, Specifications & Estimate, schedule, and proposed phasing of the project.

B. Approval of Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Midyear Budget for the Authority and Congestion Management Agency (CMA)
Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of Resolution 25-12-A (Rev 1), which will update changes to the FY 2025-26 budget.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 66 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 18, 2026

ACTION: Vice Chair Noack moved to approve Resolution 25-12-A (Rev 1), which will update changes to the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget, seconded by Commissioner Meadows. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of the commissioners present, unless otherwise noted.

Noes-None
Absent-None
Abstain-None
DISCUSSION: Yuliana Tjeng, Finance Manager, provided a background and overview of the budget process, proposed summary of changes and overall budget reduction due to project timelines and program updates, overview of the revenues, which remain stable, overview of projected federal, state, and local grants, proposed expenditures for projects, programs, planning, administration, and debt, and an update on staffing levels.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

C. Overview of Consultant Costs for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Recommendation: Staff will present a summary of consultant costs for FY 2024-

25. This is an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

DISCUSSION: Ryan McClain, Deputy Executive Director, Projects and Operations, provided a background and overview of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 revenues, overall expenditures, consultant expenditures, engineering/planning consultant costs, and project-specific expenditures on the Interstate 680/State Route 4 project.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff responded to comments from commissioners.

9. Planning Committee - Regular:

A. Update on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC) One Bay Area Grant Cycle 4 (OBAG 4) and Related Policies and Funding Programs Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on the policies recently adopted by MTC as related to the OBAG 4 Program. This is an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

DISCUSSION: Matt Kelly, Director, Planning, provided a background and overview of OBAG 4, including the regional and county share, recent revisions to the TransitOriented Communities Incentive Program framework, including changes to the regional share submittal deadline, criteria, and eligibility, and an overview of Cycle 3 of the Measure J Transportation for Livable Communities and Pedestrian, Bicycle Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 67 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 18, 2026

and Trail Facilities, which will be combined with the call for projects for OBAG 4. Mr.

Kelly further discussed other grant funding sources and the proposed schedule.

Commissioners provided comments. Staff and Rep. Noack responded to comments from commissioners.

Rep. Worth left the meeting from 7:09 PM-7:16 PM.

10. Transportation Expenditure Plan - Regular:

A. NEW ITEM: Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) Development Update Recommendation: Staff will provide an update on the development of the TEP.

This is an informational item only; no staff recommendation at this time.

DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, introduced the item. Lindy Johnson, Director, External Affairs, provided a brief introduction of the objectives and introduced Tommy Clifford with CliffordMoss. Mr. Clifford discussed the three phases of engagement with stakeholders and voters, i.e., Phase 1 of listening, Phase 2 for setting priorities, and Phase 3 for the adoption and education of a final TEP.

Ms. Johnson discussed the Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP) engagement, fireside chats with Contra Costa County and the local jurisdictions, including transit agencies and the Regional Transportation Planning Committees, and an overview of stakeholder listening sessions, including advocacy organizations, community-based organizations, and labor and business groups.

Mr. Clifford indicated that engagement would build upon the existing CTP outreach with additional listening areas and that the Authority Board would be vital for gauging stakeholders and public opinion.

Commissioners and representatives provided comments. Staff and Mr. Clifford responded to comments from commissioners and representatives.

Commissioner Arnerich left the meeting at 7:52 PM.

11. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATIONS

12. ASSOCIATED COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Central County (TRANSPAC): Meeting Report for the regular meetings on February 12, 2026 and March 12, 2026 (Attachment and meeting handout if available) B. East County (TRANSPLAN): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on March 12, 2026 (Meeting handout if available)
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 68 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 18, 2026

C. Southwest County (SWAT): Notice of Cancellation for the regular meeting on March 2, 2026
D. West County (WCCTAC): Meeting Report for the regular meeting on February 27, 2026

13. AUTHORITY BOARD AND STAFF COMMENTS
A. Chair's Comments and Reports
B. Commissioners' and Ex-Officio Representatives’ Comments and Reports on Activities and Meetings
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Xavier announced that the City of San Pablo’s Rumrill Boulevard Complete Streets Project was awarded a Built Environment Award at the 2026 East Bay Innovation Awards, which is the seventh award for this project.

Commissioner Armstrong announced that the City of San Ramon’s Iron Horse Trail Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing at Bollinger Canyon Road Project has received three awards, including the 2026 Outstanding Local Streets and Roads Project Award from the California State Association of Counties, League of California Cities, and County Engineers Association of California, and was awarded the 2026 Project of the Year by the American Public Works Association (APWA) Northern California Chapter, making it eligible for national consideration by the APWA.

Rep. Noack clarified the criteria for the Transit-Oriented Communities and Priority Development Areas in One Bay Area Grant Cycle 4, discussed meetings over the past two days in Sacramento to push for funding to return to statutory levels for cap and investments in the state budget, provided an update on Senate Bill 1087 (Cabaldon), and announced that Plan Bay Area 2050 was approved by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and was agendized for approval by the Association of Bay Area Governments.

C. Executive Staff Comments
DISCUSSION: Timothy Haile, Executive Director, thanked Programs staff and discussed the success of the Accessible Transportation Workshop on February 17- 18, 2026, announced that a video is being developed, and the 2026 Engineering Excellence Honor Award for the Iron Horse Trail Overcrossing at Bollinger Canyon Road from the American Council of Engineering Companies, discussed participation by Authority staff at the Countywide Office of Emergency Services Workshop, and provided an update on Senate Bill 1408 (Arreguin) and the reauthorization legislation for the Authority.

14. CALENDAR
A. March, April, May, and June 2026
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 69 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Authority Board Meeting MINUTES
March 18, 2026

B. Calendar of Upcoming Events

15. ADJOURNMENT to the next regular meeting proposed for April 15, 2026 at 6:00 PM.

DISCUSSION: The meeting was adjourned at 8:03 PM.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 70 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 TRANSPAC Board Meeting Summary Minutes
Meeting Date: December 11, 2025
Commissioners Present: Greg Young, Martinez; Richard Enea, Clayton; Carlyn Obringer, Concord (Chair); Kevin Wilk, Walnut Creek;
Sue Noack, Pleasant Hill; Ken Carlson, Contra Costa
County (Vice Chair)
Planning Commissioners Present: Alex Khalfin, Pleasant Hill; Molly Klopp, Walnut Creek; Craig Mizutani, Concord
Staff Present: Samantha Harris, Contra Costa County; Andy Smith, County Connection; Anthony Nuti, Pleasant Hill; Kirsten Riker, 511CCTA; Tiffany Gephart, TRANSPAC; Matt
Todd, TRANSPAC Managing Director;
Guests/Presenters: Danielle Elkins, CCTA; Cara DeJong, 511CCTA/Street Smarts Diablo
Minutes Prepared By: Tiffany Gephart

1. Convene Regular Meeting / Pledge of Allegiance / Self-Introductions Chair Obringer called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

2. Public Comment
No public comments were offered.

3. Consent Agenda
a. Approval of Minutes
Action Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the November 13, 2025, TRANSPAC Board meeting.
b. CCTA Executive Director's Report Regarding CCTA Actions/Discussion Items c. Items Approved by the CCTA for Circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees and Related Items of Interest
d. RTPC Meeting Summary Letters
e. CCTA Meeting Updates and Countywide Information Links f. Transportation Meetings Attended by Staff
g. Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program – Development Project Tracking h. 2026 TRANSPAC Meeting Schedule
Action Recommendation: Approve the TRANSPAC Meeting Schedule for 2026. 3DJH
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 71 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 On motion by Commissioner Noack, second by Commissioner Carlson, the Consent Agenda was approved by unanimous vote of the members present (Young, Enea, Obringer, Noack, Wilk, Carlson).

4. Election of Chair and Vice Chair
Chair Obringer noted the TRANSPAC Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) calls for the election of a Chair and Vice Chair annually, with terms commencing in February. Chair Obringer nominated Vice Chair Carlson as the incoming Chair and Commissioner Young (Martinez) as the incoming Vice Chair for the term February 1, 2026, through January 31, 2027.

On motion by Chair Obringer, seconded by Commissioner Wilk, to appoint Commissioner Ken Carlson as Chair and Commissioner Greg Young as Vice Chair for the term February 1, 2026, through January 31, 2027 by unanimous vote of the members present (Young, Enea, Obringer, Noack, Wilk, Carlson).

5. Appointment of TRANSPAC Representatives to the CCTA
On motion by Commissioner Carlson, second by Commissioner Young, to appoint Commissioner Sue Noack as the TRANSPAC representative and Commissioner Richard Enea as the alternate representative to the CCTA Board for the term February 1, 2026, through January 31, 2028 by unanimous vote of the members present (Young, Enea, Obringer, Noack, Wilk, Carlson).

6. TRANSPAC Committee Appointments
Staff presented the appointment of TRANSPAC representatives to the CCTA Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (CBPAC). The current terms were set to expire December 31, 2025. The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) provided recommendations for the primary and alternate seats.

Ms. Gephart noted that citizen representative Scott Simmons indicated this would be his last term, and requested that the Board consider another citizen representative in the new year.

On motion by Commissioner Noack, second by Commissioner Young, to appoint Briana Byrne (Walnut Creek) as the primary representative and Aaron Elias (Concord) as the alternate representative to the CCTA CBPAC for the term January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2027 by unanimous vote of the members present (Young, Enea, Obringer, Noack, Wilk, Carlson).

7. Measure J Line 20a Funds Program Policies – FY 2026/2027 - FY 2027/2028 Ms. Gephart presented the final call for projects and application material the Measure J Line 20a Program, which is funded by the county's half-cent sales tax and provides funds for transportation services for seniors and people with disabilities in the TRANSPAC area. Ms. Gephart reviewed updates made since the November Board meeting, including new questions about federal funding sources and updated expenditure deadlines. She outlined the schedule with an application workshop on January 6, 2026, applications due January 23, and presentations to the Board between March and April. 3DJH
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 72 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Chair Obringer inquired whether the holiday release timing might impact response rates. Ms. Gephart noted that current and past sponsors are familiar with the timeline and have already been in contact, with historically seven to ten applicants or projects per cycle. Mr. Todd added that the application workshop is scheduled for January 6 when organizations are getting back into their routines, and this timing has worked better than past December workshops.

Commissioner Carlson emphasized the importance of timely progress reports and invoicing and requested that the Board be made aware of any organizations that are not meeting reporting deadlines.

Commissioner Noack requested redlined copies for future policy updates.

On motion by Commissioner Noack, second by Commissioner Young, to approve the final call for projects and application material for the FY 2026/2027 and FY 2027/2028 Measure J Line 20a Program and release the call for projects by unanimous vote of the members present (Young, Enea, Obringer, Noack, Wilk, Carlson).

8. 511 Contra Costa/Street Smarts Diablo Program Update Cara DeJong presented an overview of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs funded by CCTA, including the Big Win transit incentive program, Pass to Class free transit for students, E-bike rebates, and the Walk and Roll program at elementary schools. A copy of the presentation is included with the meeting materials and available at transpac.us.

The Walk and Roll program currently has 11 schools enrolled with additional schools joining in January/February 2026, and has resulted in more than 30,000 trips and 1.2 million school year vehicle miles reduced. Chair Obringer asked about capacity for additional schools, and Ms. DeJong explained that CCTA has allowed use of Measure J funds beyond the initial seven schools. Commissioner Enea asked about training and e-bike enforcement. Ms. DeJong confirmed she visits every school for walkthroughs and that Street Smarts assemblies address e-bike laws, with enforcement being the responsibility of school districts.

Planning Commissioner Mizutani noted that much of the program's focus is on bikes and asked about the walk component. Ms. DeJong clarified that while bikes are used as the program image because biking represents a true transportation switch for longer distances, all active transportation including walking and carpooling receives the same incentives. Mr.Mizutani recommended promoting the walking aspect since it is highly accessible to all students. Chair Obringer requested a schedule of Walk and Roll days to attend.

9. TRANSPAC CCTA Representative Reports
Commissioner Carlson reported that the CCTA held a two-day workshop in Oakley focused on the countywide transportation plan and developing an action plan for the eventual renewal of Measure J.

Chair Obringer added that there is countywide interest in exploring free bus service for students to get to school in partnership with County Connection.
3DJH

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 73 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

10. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Report
Commissioner Noack reported that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is working on the Transit Oriented Communities (TOC) policy, with the latest proposal not tying funds to OBAG 4 in 2026 and 2027. She also reported on efforts to address potential severe transit service cuts. While SB 63 was passed to place a measure on the November 2026 ballot, there is approximately a one-year funding gap. The state requested that MTC find $750 million to cover the four big transit agencies using capital project funds for operating expenses with payback provisions. Commissioner Enea noted surprise at the low amount Contra Costa County would receive from SB 63. Commissioner Noack explained that returnto-source funding depends on population and contribution to sales tax.

11. TAC Oral Reports by Jurisdiction
No reports were provided.

12. Board Member Comments
Commissioner Wilk announced that Council Member Craig DeVinney will serve as Walnut Creek's representative to TRANSPAC for the next year. Commissioners thanked Mr. Todd and Ms. Gephart for their leadership throughout the year. Commissioner Young commented that he looks forward to serving as Vice Chair in 2026 and Chair Obringer expressed appreciation for the opportunity to chair the past year.

13. Managing Director's Report
Mr. Todd noted that the consent calendar includes a standing link to Street Smarts Diablo programs. He thanked the Board for their leadership throughout the year.

14. Adjournment / Next Meeting
The meeting was adjourned at 10:05 a.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled for February 12, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. at Pleasant Hill City Hall Large Community Room, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill. 3DJH
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 74 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT
December 17, 2025
Our New Programs Manager – Haleema Bharoocha: December 1, 2025 We are excited to welcome Haleema Bharoocha to the Authority team as our new Programs Manager for the Office of Accessibility and Equity. She started on December 1, bringing a combination of transportation policy expertise, community engagement leadership, and realworld program management experience. Haleema holds a Master of Public Policy from the University of California, Berkeley, with a focus on transportation and urban planning, and she was the Transportation Solutions Manager at San José State University, where she led multimodal programs, managed contracts, and oversaw performance and budgeting. Her background includes impactful work with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), TransForm, the American Public Transportation Association, and multiple statewide safety and equity initiatives, as well as nationally recognized campaigns to improve transit safety and accessibility. Her deep commitment to equity, data-driven policy, and collaborative implementation makes her an outstanding addition to Authority, and we are thrilled for her to join the team.

American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA) Annual Meeting: December 2, 2025 I was invited to speak at the keynote opening session of the ACPA annual meeting in Carlsbad, California, helping set the tone for the conference by focusing on California’s transportation priorities, infrastructure delivery, and the critical role of concrete pavement in advancing our transportation system. I highlighted the Authority’s innovative construction program, with nearly $600 million going to construction over the next three years, and our unique funding strategy that blends state and federal resources while leveraging our local transportation sales tax. My remarks emphasized the importance of strong public–private partnerships, innovative project delivery, and sustained investment to meet growing demand amid workforce and funding challenges.

Shared Autonomous Vehicle Ridership for Martinez – November 2025 Martinez Ridership
May Mobility’s ridership stayed steady at 127 riders, the same as in October 2025. The fleet is currently running with four operators, as two operators are no longer with the program.

There have been 893 riders with about 93,000 miles driven since the start of service last year (Sept 16, 2024) who booked their trips through the app and agent requests. Of those, 87% are repeat riders, with an average party size of 1.17 people, an average wait time of 5.3 minutes, 98% early or on-time pickups. 209 riders rated the ride 5.0 stars, with zero ratings below five stars.
3DJH
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 75 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 The operating hours are weekdays from 8:30 AM to 6:00 PM for County Hospital patients and 6:00 PM to 9:30 PM for the general public. The service does not operate on weekends.

Demonstration service is scheduled to end in December 2025.

Rossmoor
Following Rossmoor’s pilot, the community is looking for transit service. Rossmoor is working with the Authority on a new service that best fits their needs.

Website Update – November 2025
The Authority website saw more than 6,000 active users during the month of November 2025.

Our Countywide Transportation Plan page saw an increase in traffic of about 30%, possibly related to some digital advertising around the Community-Based Transportation Plans (CBTP).

Overall, the homepage and meetings page continue to be our highest traffic pages.

Social Media Metrics – November 2025
In November 2025, the Authority’s social media outreach centered on two key initiatives: the Walnut Creek Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Shared Mobility Hub (SMH) project and the Countywide CBTP. Across Meta platforms and primarily Next Door for neighborhood outreach, the Authority used targeted posts and paid advertising to drive public participation in both surveys and the virtual town hall on December 9, 2025, providing clear calls to action for residents to attend and participate.
3DJH
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 76 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 For the Walnut Creek BART SMH project, outreach highlighted proposed station-area improvements and encouraged riders, local employees, and nearby residents to complete the project survey to discuss behaviors and future amenities. These posts helped direct attention to first-/last-mile mobility challenges and opportunities specific to the Walnut Creek BART station.

For the CBTP, the Authority promoted the survey through both organic content and paid advertisements, aimed at reaching residents in MTC’s Equity Priority Communities and raising awareness of the planning process. Messaging emphasized community input on transportation needs and priorities across Contra Costa County.

Staff Out-of-State Travel: There is nothing to report this month. 3DJH
Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 77 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 TRANSPAC Board Meeting Summary Minutes
Meeting Date: February 12, 2026
Commissioners Present: Ken Carlson, Contra Costa County (Chair); Greg Young, Martinez (Vice Chair); Carlyn Obringer,
Concord; Richard Enea, Clayton; Sue Noack, Pleasant
Hill; Craig DeVinney, Walnut Creek
Planning Commissioners Present: Molly Clopp, Walnut Creek; Craig Mizutani, Concord Staff Present: Samantha Harris, Contra Costa County; Matt Todd, TRANSPAC Managing Director; Tiffany Gephart,

TRANSPAC
Guests/Presenters: Brandon Hays, CCTA; Stephanie Hu, CCTA; Danielle Elkins, CCTA; Kirsten Riker 511CCTA
Minutes Prepared By: Tiffany Gephart

1. Convene Regular Meeting / Pledge of Allegiance / Self-Introductions Chair Ken Carlson called the meeting to order at 9:04 a.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.

Chair Carlson noted the following remote participation for the record:
• Member Craig DeVinney was participating via Zoom from a noticed teleconference location in San Rafael, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953 of the Ralph M.

Brown Act (Brown Act).
• Member Greg Young was participating remotely under the just cause provision of Government Code Section 54953.8.3 due to travel while on official state business, marking his first just cause remote participation in calendar year 2026. • A quorum of four members was confirmed physically present at the Pleasant Hill City Hall location.

Roll call was conducted by Tiffany Gephart. Members present: Richard Enea (Clayton), Carlyn Obringer (Concord), Ken Carlson (Contra Costa County), Sue Noack (Pleasant Hill), Greg Young (Martinez), and Craig DeVinney (Walnut Creek).

2. Public Comment
No public comments were offered.

3. Consent Agenda
a. Approval of Minutes
Action Recommendation: Approve the minutes of the December 11, 2025, TRANSPAC Board meeting.
b. CCTA Executive Director’s Report Regarding CCTA Actions/Discussion Items

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 78 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 c. Items Approved by the CCTA for Circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees and Related Items of Interest
d. RTPC Meeting Summary Letters
e. CCTA Meeting Updates and Countywide Information Links f. Transportation Meetings Attended by Staff
g. Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program – Development Project Tracking h. TRANSPAC Quarterly Financial Report
Action Recommendation: Accept the Quarterly Financial Report for the period ended December 31, 2024.

On motion by Commissioner Obringer, second by Commissioner Noack, the Consent Agenda was approved by unanimous vote of the members present (Enea, Obringer, Carlson, Noack, Young, DeVinney).

4. Innovate 680 Technical Advisory Committee Appointments Ms. Gephart presented the item, providing background on the Innovate 680 program, which promotes an integrated approach to improving mobility along the Interstate 680 (I-680) corridor through infrastructure, technology, and transit enhancements. The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) established a Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) and a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to guide program implementation. TRANSPAC is represented on both committees for the cities of Martinez, Concord, Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek, and the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. The City of Clayton does not have a seat on either committee as Clayton does not abut I-680.

Ms. Gephart noted that TAC appointments had been confirmed at the January 2026 meeting.

She requested the Board review and confirm existing PAC appointments and noted that a request had been received to change the alternate representative for the county, to be reflected in an updated memo. Current PAC primary appointments are: Commissioner Obringer for Concord; Debbie McKillip and Brianne Zorn for Martinez; Commissioner Noack for Pleasant Hill; and Commissioner Carlson for Contra Costa County. For Walnut Creek, it was noted that Member DeVinney has replaced Member Wilk on the committee, pending confirmation from the City of Walnut Creek.

Commissioner Obringer asked for clarification on how membership in the Innovate 680 committees is determined. Stephanie Hu, CCTA Director of Projects and Innovate 680 Program Manager, explained that when the program was established, each jurisdiction along the I-680 corridor was asked to designate one elected official for the PAC and one technical staff member for the TAC, with the option to appoint an alternate. The corridor includes both SWAT and TRANSPAC member jurisdictions, from San Ramon north to Martinez, plus the county.

On motion by Commissioner Noack, second by Commissioner Obringer, the Innovate 680 PAC appointments were confirmed by unanimous vote of the members present (Enea, Obringer, Carlson, Noack, Young, DeVinney).

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 79 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

5. Brown Act Modernization – Senate Bill 707 Updates and Proposed TRANSPAC Meeting Policies
Ms. Gephart presented key changes to the Brown Act resulting from Senate Bill 707 (SB 707), signed into law on October 3, 2025 and introduced Remote Meeting Participation and Code of Conduct Policies. The Remote meeting Participation Policy outlines participation methods and obligations outlined in the Brown Act as amended by SB 707 in addition to TRANSPAC specific implementation protocols. A redlined handout of the Remote Meeting Participation Policy was distributed at the meeting incorporating additional clarifications. The Code of Conduct policy outlines procedures for handling disruptive behavior in person or via Zoom, including technology disruptions, with an escalation framework for the Chair and staff.

Chair Carlson commended the clarity of the policies and noted for the record that members participating via traditional teleconferencing must keep their technology active and the noticed location accessible to the public for the duration of the meeting. Commissioner Enea asked for clarification on this requirement, noting the distinction between just cause participation, where the member may depart without that obligation, and traditional teleconferencing, where the noticed location must remain accessible. Chair Carlson confirmed this is an existing Brown Act requirement.

On motion by Commissioner Noack, second by Commissioner Young, to adopt the TRANSPAC Remote Meeting Participation Policy and the Code of Conduct for TRANSPAC Meetings, as amended, the motion was approved by unanimous vote of the members present (Enea, Obringer, Carlson, Noack, Young, DeVinney).

6. Contra Costa Transportation Authority I-680/SR-4 Interchange Project Update I-680/State Route 4 (SR-4) Interchange Improvement Project, Phases 2A and 4 Brandon Hays, CCTA Director of Construction, presented an update on the I-680/State Route 4 (SR-4) Interchange Improvement Project, Phases 2A and 4. The project is designed to improve operational efficiency, reduce weaving conflicts, and accommodate existing and planned travel demand.

Mr. Hays described the six project phases. Phase 3, including SR-4 widening and replacement of the Grayson Creek Bridge, is complete. Phases 2A and 4 are combined into a single construction package. Phase 2A extends the southbound I-680 collector/distributor and constructs auxiliary lanes. Phase 4 constructs the southbound I-680 to eastbound SR-4 connector, including a flyover bridge and widening of the Walnut Creek and Peralta bridges. Future phases (1, 2B, and 5) address remaining interchange movements.

Key project updates:
x In May 2025, the project received $58 million in Transportation Capital Expenditure Program (TCEP) funds, fully funding Phase 2A.
x In January 2026, a constructability review was completed; comments are being incorporated into the final design.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 80 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 x Final design for Phases 2A and 4 is under Caltrans review. x Right-of-way acquisition for a storage site in Pacheco (Phase 2A) is underway; right of way certification is anticipated in March 2026. Staff has developed a plan to work around any potential delays in the acquisition process. x Required permits are anticipated in March 2026.

The project is fully funded at $262.5 million through TCEP, Regional Measure 3 (RM3), and Measure J, with construction expected to begin in October 2026 and complete in December 2029.

Commissioner Obringer asked about the jurisdiction of the storage site; Mr. Hays confirmed it is located in Pacheco. Commissioner Enea asked whether condemnation requires a Board of Supervisors vote; Vice Chair Carlson confirmed it requires a four-fifths vote and noted the preferred approach is a negotiated purchase. Mr. Hays clarified that the project affects only a portion of the access road and does not eliminate access to storage units. Commissioner Obringer asked about construction scheduling given the four-month seasonal window for increek work; Mr. Hays explained multiple bridge locations will likely be worked on each season, with sequencing at the contractor's discretion. One bridge location received a special exception to allow support columns to remain in the creek during the off-season.

The Innovate 680 Program Overview
Stephanie Hu, CCTA Director of Projects and Innovate 680 Program Manager, provided a program overview. The Innovate 680 program addresses I-680 congestion through six projects:
express lane completion, coordinated adaptive ramp metering, a part-time transit lane, shared mobility hubs, and coordinated adaptive traffic signals.

Commissioner Enea raised a question about whether express lane conversion takes existing free lanes and charges tolls. Ms. Hu clarified that the chosen alternative adds a new lane rather than converting existing free lanes, and that MTC Bay Area Express Lanes controls toll pricing while CCTA builds the infrastructure. Commissioner Enea also expressed concern regarding buson-shoulder operations, noting the emergency lane designation. Ms. Hu confirmed that the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has been an active partner throughout the planning process including October 2025 operational testing, and that the program will not proceed without state guidance. Commissioner Noack noted that coordination with CHP has been ongoing for approximately ten to fifteen years.

Commissioner DeVinney asked for clarification on the express lane gap near the Interstate 24 interchange. Ms. Hu explained the gap is intentional to allow drivers to transition lanes before reaching the interchange, and that completing the lane through that area was rejected due to cost and complexity of working around existing BART infrastructure.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 81 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

7. Measure J Line 20a Fund Program – FY 2026/2027 and FY 2027/2028 Call for Projects Ms. Gephart provided an overview of applications received for the Measure J Line 20a fund program, which provides transportation services for seniors and people with disabilities in the TRANSPAC area. The call for projects was approved in December 2025, with applications due January 23, 2026. The program is anticipated to generate approximately $1.2 million over the two-year programming period ($600,000 per year). Eleven applications were received totaling approximately $2.2 million in requests. A description of each program/request is included in the agenda packet.

Ms. Gephart noted that a scoring committee is being formed with volunteers from the City of Pleasant Hill, City of Concord, and the Area Agency on Aging from the county, with CCTA coordination also underway. Program applicants are scheduled to present at the March and April 2026 TRANSPAC Board meetings. A funding recommendation is expected in May 2026, with draft and final program approval in May and June
Commissioner Noack asked about the reserve balance; Mr. Todd indicated the reserve is approximately $300,000 to $400,000, maintained as an operational reserve in the event of a revenue downturn. Commissioner Noack requested that future materials include a column showing funding awarded in the prior cycle (FY 2024/2026) to allow the Board to see which programs have previously received funding. Commissioner Obringer requested that evaluation criteria be included in future packet materials and asked whether criteria address past performance for repeat applicants. Ms. Gephart confirmed the Board-approved criteria will be included in future packets and that a funding recipient status will be added. Commissioner Noack asked staff to confirm that current FY 2024-2026 grantees are submitting timely reimbursement requests. Ms. Gephart confirmed staff would follow up on the status

8. Form 700 Filing Requirements for 2026
Ms. Gephart reminded Board members that Form 700 (Statement of Economic Interests) filings are required for all applicable members and designated staff, with a deadline of April 1, 2026.

Members are encouraged to file electronically using the NetFile system by selecting TRANSPAC from the agency dropdown. Administrative staff will reach out to confirm all members are in the system.

9. TRANSPAC CCTA Representative Reports
Commissioner Obringer noted that CCTA Executive Director Timothy Haile informed her that the upcoming CCTA Board Workshop in May, to be held in Orinda (date to be determined), will be open to representatives from all member cities in addition to CCTA Board members, a change from prior workshops.

10. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Report
Commissioner Noack reported that the February 25th Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) meeting is expected to address the Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) policy grading system, including how performance thresholds are calculated and the eight-point protection component of the policy. The January meeting addressed allocation of funds between county and regional levels and incentive funding for adherence to the TOC policy.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 82 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

11. TAC Oral Reports by Jurisdiction
No reports were given.

12. Board Member Comments
No additional comments were offered.

13. Managing Director’s Report
Mr. Todd had no additional comments.

14. Adjourn / Next Meeting
Chair Carlson adjourned the meeting at 10:22 a.m. The next regular TRANSPAC Board meeting is scheduled for March 12, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. at Pleasant Hill City Hall, Large Community Room, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 83 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 TRANSPAC Board Meeting Summary Minutes
Meeting Date: March 12, 2026
Board Members Present: Ken Carlson, Contra Costa County (Chair); Carlyn Obringer, Concord; Sue Noack, Pleasant Hill;
Brianne Zorn, Martinez; Craig DeVinney, Walnut
Creek, Richard Enea, Clayton
Planning Commissioners Present: Craig Mizutani, Concord; Alex Khalfin, Pleasant Hill; Molly Clopp, Walnut Creek
Staff Present: Matt Todd, TRANSPAC Managing Director; Tiffany Gephart, TRANSPAC
Guests/Presenters: Danielle Elkins, CCTA; Haleema Bharoocha, CCTA; Elaine Welch, Mobility Matters; Chalo Buckman,
Mobility Matters; Kyle Boehm, County Connection;
Andy Smith, County Connection; John Sanderson,
County Connection
Minutes Prepared By: Tiffany Gephart

1. Convene Regular Meeting / Pledge of Allegiance / Self-Introductions Chair Carlson called the meeting to order at 9:01 A.M. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

Self-introductions were made.

2. Public Comment
Chair Carlson opened the floor for public comment on items not on the agenda. There were no comments from the public. Public comment was closed.

3. Consent Agenda
The consent agenda included the following items:
a. Approval of Minutes
Minutes of the February 12, 2026, TRANSPAC Board Meeting. b. CCTA Executive Director's Report Regarding CCTA Actions / Discussion Items c. Items Approved by the CCTA for Circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees and Related Items of Interest
d. RTPC Meeting Summary Letters
e. CCTA Meeting Updates and Countywide Information Links f. Transportation Meetings Attended by Staff
g. Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program – Development Project Tracking

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 84 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 On motion by Commissioner Noack, seconded by Commissioner Obringer, to approve the consent agenda by unanimous vote of the members present (Zorn, Enea, Carlson, Obringer, Noack, DeVinney).

4. Measure J Program 17 Funding Request – City of Martinez Bicycle Parking Facilities Matt Todd provided an introduction to this item, noting that Measure J Program 17 funds support programs within the 511 Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) program, including a subprogram for bicycle parking infrastructure. Danielle Elkins of CCTA presented the details of the funding request. The proposal would allow CCTA to enter into an agreement with the City of Martinez who will operate and maintain bicycle facilities funded through the program. The request is for $13,402.54 to purchase 20 circular bike racks and 2 bike repair stations at locations to be determined by the City. Ms. Elkins noted that approximately $100,000 per year is available for this type of infrastructure, with a requirement that parking be publicly accessible.

Commissioner Zorn noted that the City of Martinez recently established a new sustainability subcommittee of the City Council, and that expanding bicycle parking was one of the committee's initiatives. She added that the city is proposing to install the facilities in daylighted parking spaces that have been red-curbed, as an innovative use of those spaces.

On motion by Commissioner Noack͕ ƐĞĐŽŶĚ ďLJ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌ KďƌŝŶŐĞƌ, to approve the programming of $13,402.54 in already allocated Measure J Program 17 funding for the installation of 20 circular bike racks and 2 bike repair stations within the City of Martinez, by unanimous vote of the members present (Zorn, Enea, Carlson, Obringer, Noack, Devinney).

5. Measure J Line 20a Fund Program – FY 2026/2027 and FY 2027/2028 Program Tiffany Gephart provided an overview of the Measure J Line 20a fund program, which provides funds for transportation services for seniors and people with disabilities in the TRANSPAC area.

Staff received nine applications covering eight programs and two capital requests for the FY 2026/2027–2027/2028 funding cycle, with a submission deadline of January 23, 2026.

Applications were received from County Connection (Contra Costa Rural Lifeline program, Travel Training, Midday Free Rides, and Monument Free Paratransit), the City of Walnut Creek Transportation Program, the City of Concord Senior Transportation Program, Golden Rain Foundation / Rossmoor, Choice in Aging (Mount Diablo Mobilizer), and Mobility Matters (Rides for Seniors and Rides for Veterans). A scoring committee has been formed, consisting of Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) members, a representative from the Contra Costa County Area Agency on Aging, and a CCTA representative. The committee is scheduled to meet the following week to evaluate applications, with a draft recommendation planned for May and a final recommendation to the Board in June.

Four applicants were invited to present their programs at this meeting: Mobility Matters, and three programs from County Connection.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 85 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Mobility Matters – Rides for Seniors and Rides for Veterans Elaine Welch, founder of Mobility Matters, presented on the organization's volunteer driver programs. Mobility Matters is a nonprofit that provides free, door-through-door, one-on-one escorted transportation for seniors aged 60 and older who live in Contra Costa County and are not in institutional settings. A second program, Rides for Veterans, serves disabled veterans of any age. Ms. Welch described the organization's transportation information and referral helpline, which matches riders to providers and assists callers in identifying accessible transportation options. The organization has approximately 500 members and 200 volunteers, with six paid staff and some paid part-time drivers. Ms. Welch announced that she will be retiring this year after decades of leading the organization and introduced her successor who was present at the meeting.

Planning Commissioner Khalfin asked how individuals access the program and what the typical response time is. Ms. Welch described a case management model in which staff conduct an intake assessment using a series of screening questions and then refer callers to the appropriate provider or enroll them in Mobility Matters' program when no other options are available. She clarified that the program serves the most vulnerable and economically limited individuals, and refers those with disposable income to paid providers.

Planning Commissioner Khalfin asked how individuals become volunteer drivers. Ms. Welch explained that volunteers must be between the ages of 25 and 75, with exceptions allowed up to 79 for qualifying individuals. Volunteers undergo background checks, DMV screening, and a three-hour training focused on safe interactions with seniors. The organization publicizes volunteer opportunities through events, outreach staff, and a biennial resource guide called "Way to Go Contra Costa."
Chair Carlson asked about tracking TRANSPAC-specific ridership given that Mobility Matters serves a broader county-wide population. Ms. Welch clarified that the organization maintains records identifying which rides were funded by TRANSPAC, which accounts for approximately 50% of the organization's rides, and provides monthly billing reports to TRANSPAC accordingly.

Mr. Todd added that staff has historically worked with Mobility Matters on an aggregate basis, tracking the overall TRANSPAC-funded share rather than individual trips.

County Connection – Midday Free Rides and Monument Free Paratransit Kyle Boehm, Grants Administrator at County Connection, presented on two programs. The Midday Free Rides program is a continuation of an existing program funded under Measure J Line 20a. It provides free rides on County Connection fixed routes for students with disabilities to support travel training, limited to off-peak hours between 10:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. Participating programs include Mount Diablo Unified School District, RES Success, and Clayton Valley Charter High School, which was recently added. Over the past two years, approximately 163 participants have used the program. Ridership has remained steady, with approximately 2,500 projected trips per month over the next two-year period. The program cost is $66,000 over two years, with reimbursement based on actual usage. A heat map showing that 99.7% of trips originate on a route within or serving the TRANSPAC area was included in the presentation.

Commissioner Obringer asked about which cities are served by the Clayton Valley Charter High School component, noting that the school draws students from multiple cities. Mr. Boehm

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 86 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 clarified that the program is available to students with disabilities in the school's transition program, and that participation is not limited to residents of a specific city.

Chair Carlson asked how students are identified for drivers and how trips are tracked. Mr. Boehm explained that participants receive a sticker for their student ID badge that identifies them as part of the program. Drivers record the trip using a device on board, which also generates origin data used to produce the ridership heat maps.

Mr. Boehm then presented on the Monument Free Paratransit program, a new initiative proposed in response to a direction received during County Connection's most recent triennial review. County Connection currently provides free fixed-route fares on routes serving the Monument corridor using Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds from cap-andtrade greenhouse gas reduction revenues. The triennial review directed that free paratransit fares also be provided for paratransit trips originating within the three-quarter-mile catchment area of those routes, to bring paratransit fares into parity with free fixed-route fares. The proposed program would cover the $5 Link paratransit fare for eligible certified Link paratransit riders. Andy Smith, Director of Planning and Marketing at County Connection, was also available to answer questions.

Commissioner Obringer asked about language support and the intake process for the Monument community, noting the linguistic diversity of the area including Afghan diaspora communities.

Mr. Boehm noted that users must first be certified Link paratransit riders. John Sanderson, Director of ADA and Specialized Services at County Connection, added that the customer service call center uses Language Line for translation assistance when needed, and that drivers are trained to communicate with passengers across language differences.

County Connection – Link Extended Service Area / Rural Lifeline and Travel Training John Sanderson presented on two additional County Connection programs. The County Connection Link Extended Service Area and Rural Lifeline Transportation program expands paratransit service to residents living outside of County Connection's standard ADA-mandated service area, as shown in the purple shading on maps included in the presentation.

Approximately half of County Connection's total Link paratransit service occurs within the TRANSPAC area, a portion of which exceeds the federally mandated three-quarter-mile ADA service boundary. The full program request totals approximately $500,000. Mr. Sanderson noted that weekend ADA paratransit service areas are smaller than weekday areas, and that this program helps preserve weekend access to a broader range of destinations.

Chair Carlson asked about ridership. Mr. Sanderson reported approximately 2,500 unique users and 100,000 trips in the most recent year. Commissioner Zorn asked how riders request service.

Mr. Sanderson explained that Link paratransit operates a reservation-based call center accepting trip requests until close of business the day before travel, with a requirement to provide service within one hour before or after the requested time.

Matt Todd asked for clarification on the service area map, which depicted blue, yellow, and purple zones. Mr. Sanderson explained that blue represents the ADA-mandated service area (three-quarters of a mile from fixed routes while in operation), yellow represents an additional three-quarter-mile buffer that County Connection has historically served beyond the ADA

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 87 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 requirement, and purple represents areas served on weekdays but not weekends, as well as areas more than one and a half miles beyond a County Connection route.

Mr. Sanderson then presented on the County Connection Travel Training program. The program is modeled on best practices from successful programs in other regions, including Seattle and Chicago, and builds on lessons from a prior County Connection travel training effort from 2022 through 2025. The proposed program would allocate one full-time equivalent staff position to travel coaching, along with funding for marketing, outreach materials, and program support. The goal is to establish a sustainable, well-functioning travel training program over the two-year period, with opportunities for coordination with CCTA on related programs.

Commissioner Obringer asked about anticipated demand and outreach strategy. Mr. Sanderson indicated that the primary target population would be seniors and people with disabilities, and described plans for outreach at senior centers, day programs, and community events. He noted that raising awareness is a key challenge, as many potential participants are unaware that travel coaching assistance is available. He also highlighted an interest in reaching non-English-speaking communities, particularly at senior day programs, by identifying local champions among program participants.

Commissioner Obringer suggested that outreach also target residents of new affordable housing developments in downtown areas within the TRANSPAC region, noting that many such projects have large immigrant populations. Mr. Sanderson agreed that senior housing is a rich outreach opportunity, and committed to finding ways to reach residents in multiple languages including Pashto and Dari.

Planning Commissioner Mizutani asked whether County Connection offers incentive programs or discounted fare opportunities tied to new residential developments. Andy Smith described two regional programs administered through the Clipper card system: Clipper START, a low-income discount pass available to individuals at or below 200% of the federal poverty level, which provides half-price fares across the Bay Area; and Clipper Bay Pass, an institutional pass program in which a housing developer or other institution purchases passes for all residents or members, providing unlimited Bay Area transit access at a subsidized rate. Commissioner Noack added that the Clipper Bay Pass program is currently available through two channels—universities/schools and corporations—and noted that at least one affordable housing developer has previously purchased Clipper access for residents. She indicated that expansion of these programs is anticipated to be part of a transit measure on the November 2026 ballot.

Planning Commissioner Mizutani commented that combining digital access to trip planning information with hands-on assistance signing up for transit passes would be a compelling outreach strategy. Mr. Sanderson confirmed that County Connection staff would be willing to assist residents through the sign-up process.

Planning Commissioner Mizutani also asked whether the County Connection travel training model is based on a specific transit agency's program. Mr. Sanderson confirmed it was modeled on a survey of national best practices rather than a single agency, and that the two-year rampup is designed to build back-office infrastructure and trainee tracking systems that were lacking in the prior program.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 88 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Chair Carlson raised a question about ensuring that Measure J Line 20a funds benefit the TRANSPAC service area specifically, noting that some programs operate countywide or across multiple subregional planning committee areas. He asked how staff tracks whether funded rides have an origin or destination within the TRANSPAC area. Matt Todd clarified that the historical standard has been that a trip must either originate or terminate within the TRANSPAC service area to be considered eligible. Mr. Sanderson noted that approximately 80% of trips are within the TRANSPAC area, with the remaining 20% having an origin or destination in an adjacent area such as the Southwest Area Transportation (SWAT) committee region. He also noted that the regional coordination challenge is compounded by the fact that other subregional planning committees, such as TRANSPLAN, do not have the same dedicated Measure J funding structure.

Ms. Welch confirmed that Mobility Matters tracks TRANSPAC-funded rides separately and provides monthly billing reports that distinguish TRANSPAC-originating trips from others.

Danielle Elkins noted that West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC) handles its Line 20a funds differently, distributing them directly to existing providers through the Transit Claim 15 process rather than an open call for projects.

Tiffany Gephart added that approximately 60 to 70% of trips funded through TRANSPAC's Line 20a program are wholly within the TRANSPAC area, based on tracking by staff and program operators.

Commissioner Zorn observed that across the presentations, access to programs appeared to rely primarily on phone calls rather than digital or app-based options. She suggested that digital alternatives would improve accessibility, particularly given the variety of providers and the research burden placed on potential users.

Mr. Sanderson noted that County Connection's Link paratransit app allows users to rebook previously taken trips and view real-time arrival information, though it is limited for booking new trips. He indicated that County Connection has also piloted live chat options.

Ms. Elkins described CCTA's OPTIMAT initiative, a U.S. Department of Transportation grant focused on developing a unified information and referral platform for the county's 25-plus accessible transportation operators. The project is being developed in partnership with UC Berkeley PATH and aims to allow users to input their origin, destination, and needs to identify available options, even if booking still occurs through individual providers. She noted that the complexity stems from the variety of software systems used by different operators, some of which still rely on spreadsheets or paper-based records.

Haleema Bharoocha of CCTA clarified that the OPTIMAT platform is intended for information and referral only, not for booking. Booking for specialized services would continue to involve direct contact with individual providers, given the highly individualized nature of eligibility and service delivery. She emphasized that even creating a unified information platform would be a significant achievement given the fragmentation of existing systems.

Ms. Welch noted that the average age of Mobility Matters' clients is approximately 85, and that most clients prefer telephone access over digital tools. She and Ms. Bharoocha agreed that a bifurcated system offering both online and telephone options would best serve the full range of users.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 89 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

6. Form 700 Filing Requirements for 2026
Ms. Gephart provided a reminder that Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700) filings are required for all applicable members, alternates, planning commissioners, and TAC members by the deadline of April 1, 2026. Filing is completed electronically through the NetFile system, where TRANSPAC appears as a dropdown option. Staff will provide a status report and follow up individually with any members who have not yet filed. Irina Nalitkina is assisting with tracking filings. Chair Carlson suggested that any deficiency notices be sent by email directly to individual members rather than addressed publicly.

7. TRANSPAC CCTA Representative Reports
Commissioner Obringer reported on the March 5, 2026, CCTA Planning Committee meeting. The Planning Committee approved the release of a request for proposals (RFP) to develop a countywide model ordinance for micro mobility and a potential countywide shared micro mobility agreement. Commissioner Obringer also noted that three grants were approved to fund traffic signal improvements in three corridors: Lamorinda, Danville, and Concord (along Concord Boulevard and portions of Concord Avenue). The grants were secured through Congressman Mark DeSaulnier's office. The contract for the Danville corridor was previously awarded, the Concord contract has been awarded, and the Lamorinda contract is pending award.

Danielle Elkins noted that a Redefining Mobility Summit is planned for May and invited the Board to stay tuned for details.

8. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Report
Commissioner Noack reported on recent Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) actions. She noted that MTC finalized the Transit Oriented Communities (TOC) incentive program, under which $45 million from the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) 4 program will be set aside to incentivize cities that adopt tenant protection and housing policies. Of the 100 total program points, only eight are tied to the protection component, and cities must select two of ten available protection options. She noted that Contra Costa County cities may use countyadministered programs such as rental assistance to satisfy one of the two required options, providing additional flexibility. The $45 million comes from the regional share of the OBAG 4 allocation, not the county share.

Commissioner Noack also reported that MTC, the California Department of Finance, and the Governor's office negotiated a $590 million loan to the four largest Bay Area transit agencies to bridge the anticipated funding gap between the expiration of COVID-era relief funding in July 2026 and the potential receipt of revenues from a transit ballot measure in November 2026, if approved by voters. The loan carries a two-year interest-free period followed by a 10-year repayment term, with loan security in place to protect MTC. The loan does not draw from the state general fund.

Planning Commissioner Khalfin asked how the $45 million TOC set-aside figure was determined.

Commissioner Noack explained that the figure was chosen to be large enough to create a meaningful incentive while not displacing other OBAG-funded programs and projects.

Commissioner Noack also noted that MTC has begun planning for Plan Bay Area 2060, the next long-range regional transportation plan.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 90 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

9. TAC Oral Reports by Jurisdiction
No reports were given by TAC representatives.

10. Board Member Comments
No comments were offered by Board members.

11. Managing Director's Report
Mr. Todd noted that a CCTA Board Workshop is tentatively planned for May 14–15, 2026, which would conflict with the regularly scheduled May TRANSPAC Board meeting on May 14. The workshop is expected to cover the Countywide Transportation Plan and Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) topics, and invitations are expected to be extended to elected officials from all cities in the county, not only CCTA Board members. Staff sent an email to Board members the previous day requesting input on alternative meeting dates.

12. Adjourn / Next Meeting
The meeting adjourned at approximately 10:22 A.M. The next regular meeting is proposed for Thursday, April 9, 2026, at 9:00 A.M. at Pleasant Hill City Hall, Large Community Room, 100 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill. Remote teleconference information will be included in the posted meeting materials.

Item 9.4
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 91 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 1, 2026
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.__-26 AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO THE

CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE

ALLOCATION OF ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP)
CYCLE 8 PROJECT FUNDING FOR THE MONUMENT BOULEVARD

AND CONTRA COSTA BOULEVARD ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

PROJECT

SYNOPSIS
The City is proposing to submit an Active Transportation Program (ATP) grant application in the amount of $26,028,000 to improve pedestrian and bicycle access through the Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard corridor. Key improvements include modifications to the I-680 on-ramps and off-ramps, 10-foot-wide shared use paths with 5-foot buffer (Class I) and connection to the Iron Horse Trail.

The purpose of this item is to consider adopting a Resolution to authorize the Public Works Director to submit an ATP Cycle 8 grant application for the Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard Active Transportation Project

DISCUSSION
Background
The ATP was created by Senate Bill 99 to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as walking or biking. California’s ATP draws both state and federal funds to provide approximately $320 million annually to support bike and pedestrian projects across California. The goals of the ATP include, but are not limited to, increasing the proportion of trips accomplished by walking or biking, increasing the safety and mobility of non-motorized users, advancing greenhouse gas reduction efforts, enhancing public health and providing a broad spectrum of projects to benefit may types of users, including disadvantaged communities.

The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and California Transportation Commission (CTC) notified agencies of available ATP grant funds in March 2026. Eligible projects may Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 92 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 include capital projects, plans, and education and encouragement programs. The MTC and CTC requires a supporting Resolution from the City Council to be eligible for grant funds.

The ATP program allows the City to submit one grant application per cycle. The grant award process has historically been very competitive. Although agencies are not required to provide a local funding match for the grant, it is strongly encouraged in order to remain competitive in the grant selection and award process. Staff is proposing a 5% local match ($1,310,000), which will provide 2 points to the City’s final grant score.

The City previously applied for ATP Cycle 6 grant funding in June 2022, which included the installation of a Class I shared-use path along the Monument Boulevard corridor from the City Limits to Contra Costa Boulevard and Lisa Lane from Monument Boulevard to the Fair Oaks Elementary School. The ATP Cycle 6 grant application was unsuccessful for the following reasons:
 Insufficient support from project-adjacent disadvantaged communities  Insufficient documentation illustrating the lack of connectivity along the corridor  Insufficient disadvantaged community public engagement  Project limits should be extended to West Hookston Road at the EBMUD trail to provide connectivity to the Library, schools, and other facilities To address the feedback from the ATP 6 grant committee, staff then applied for and received $50,000 in MTC Technical Assistance Grant funds to strengthen the grant application for the next round of ATP funding. The grant funding was used for PS&E that extended the project limits to include a Class IV separated bikeway along Contra Costa Boulevard from Monument Boulevard to West Hookston Road with additional East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Trail crossing improvements. Additionally, as part of the Safe Streets for All action plan, staff has conducted significant public outreach for the Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard corridors, including tabling at City sponsored events, public meetings, direct mailings to the project-adjacent disadvantaged communities, and a City sponsored survey.

In May 2026, staff submitted a preliminary application for the Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard Active Transportation Project to MTC for review and to obtain feedback on the application. This feedback will be included in the final ATP grant application.

Analysis
Staff has identified the Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard Active Transportation Project (Project) as the ideal project for the Cycle 8 grant application to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation. The project will construct approximately 3,480 feet of a Class Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 93 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 I shared-use path along the Monument Boulevard between the City Limits to Contra Costa Boulevard and Lisa Lane from Monument Boulevard to Fair Oaks Elementary School. The project will also construct approximately 1,400 feet of a Class IV separated bikeway along the Contra Costa Boulevard corridor from Monument Boulevard to West Hookston Road. Additional improvements include, but are not limited to, traffic signal improvements, additional landscaping, pedestrian crossing upgrades, and drainage improvements along both the Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard corridors. This section of Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard are identified as high priority corridors in the City’s approved Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP). In addition, the City’s draft Safety Action Plan identifies both of these corridors along the draft High Injury Network (HIN).

Monument Boulevard is a busy principal arterial in the City of Pleasant Hill with an average daily traffic volume of 45,320 vehicles per day within the project extents. Contra Costa Boulevard is a busy principal arterial in the City of Pleasant Hill with an average daily traffic volume of 30,623 vehicles per day. Residents and pedestrians are currently reluctant to utilize Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard as a safe path of travel due to the high volumes of motorized traffic.

The proposed improvements are needed to provide students, residents, and bicyclists a safe means of access to the many facilities in the area. The project will encourage walking/biking to schools and other civic destinations from the surrounding neighborhoods.

If the ATP grant application is successful, funds would become available in FY 27/28 through FY 30/31.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total project improvement cost, including environmental, design, and construction is estimated at $26,028,000. The local match for the project is $1,310,000 (5%) and will be funded by Measure K and Traffic Impact Fee funds.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Move to adopt Resolution No. __-26 Authorizing a Request to the California Transportation Commission Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 8 Project Funding for the Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard Active Transportation Project
Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 94 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council can choose not to adopt the proposed Resolution and not authorize the filing of the ATP grant application. Funding could be sought from other sources, or the City could choose not to construct the Project.

ATTACHMENT(S)
Proposed Resolution
Project Location Maps
Attachment A - ATP Grant Attachment A Signature Page
Attachment B - Monument Boulevard Feasibility Study
Attachment C- Contra Costa Boulevard Conceptual Layouts Attachment D: Project Programmed Request
Prepared by: Anthony Nuti, Associate Engineer
Reviewed by: Ann James, Public Works Director
Reviewed by: Erick Cheung, Chief Financial Officer
Approved by: Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager
Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 95 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RESOLUTION NO. -26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

AUTHORIZING A REQUEST TO THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMISSION

AND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF 2026 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (CYCLE 8) FUNDS FOR THE MONUMENT

BOULEVARD AND CONTRA COSTA BOULEVARD ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

PROJECT
WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 99 (Chapter 359, Statues 2013) and Assembly Bill 101 (Chapter 354, Statutes 2013), establishing the Active Transportation Program (ATP); and WHEREAS, the California Transportation Commission (CTC), responsible for programing and allocating funds for the construction of highway, passenger rail, transit and active transportation improvements throughout California, has adopted CTC Resolution G-26-31, entitled “2027 Active Transportation Program Guidelines Adoption” which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of “ATP Cycle 8” funding; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Fransico Bay Area region pursuant to Government Code Sections 66508 and 65080, has adopted MTC Resolution NO. 4744, entitled “Adoption of Regional Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 8 Guidelines and Program of Projects,” which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requestions for the allocation of “ATP Cycle 8” funding; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill desires to submit a request to CTC and MTC for the allocation of ATP Cycle 8 funds to support the project described in Attachments B and C to this Resolution, which are for the exclusive benefit to encourage active transportation; and WHEREAS, the Monument Boulevard and Contra Costa Boulevard Active Transportation Project cost is estimated at $26,028,000, and the local match would be $1,310,000, which represents 5% of the total cost described in Attachment D.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that, authorizes the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute and submit the ATP Cycle 8 grant application pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code, and to take all actions necessary to apply for, accept, and administer and awarded funds, including the execution of all agreement, amendments, certifications, assurances, and related documents with the CTC, MTC, or any other applicable agency on behalf of the City as described in Attachment A; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director, or designee, is authorized by the City Council to act as the Implementing Agency for the project if awarded ATP funds, and is authorized to commit the City’s resources and funds for project delivery; and Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 96 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director, or designee, affirms that the statements contained in the ATP application package are true and complete to the best of their knowledge; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director, or designee, affirms that the City of Pleasant Hill is the manager of the public right-of-way for the proposed project, including responsibility for maintenance and operation, or has authority over such management.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project or projects described in Attachments A and B to this Resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City of Pleasant Hill to carry out the project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Pleasant Hill attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to this Resolution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this Resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to CTC and MTC as part of the statewide ATP Cycle 8 grant program.

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 1st day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
ZAC SCHESS, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
LYONE P. CONNER, City Clerk
Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 97 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 The project area is located in Pleasant Hill,
Contra Costa County, California.

Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 98 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 99 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 .. :,._.
� . " -}- ?'d \:'. J--:i \ �\ /
...,.--/
\

REGIONAL CONNECTIONS
The Monument Boulevard corridor represents a critical
east-west connection for transportation in the region.
1-680 currently presents a major barrier to pedestrian
and bicycle mobility. There are few non-interchange
crossings of 1-680. Interchanges like Monument Boulevard are characterized by high speed vehicle tra c and unprotected pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure.

Improvements to active transportation infrastructure
within the project area would create a key connection
between the regional Iron Horse Trail at the eastern
reach and Downtown Pleasant Hill at the western reach.

Connecting pedestrians and cyclists to the Iron Horse
Trail further connects them to the Pleasant Hill BART
Station and the Contra Costa Canal Trail.

I \'I c' I
, -+-=
��
r ----r
r I
ii
(
Waterway
- Par,
Item 9.5
e 100 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026
Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 101 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 ATP Cycle 8 Signature Page Attachment A
Part C: Attachments
Attachment A: Signature Page
IMPORTANT: Applications will not be accepted without all required signatures.

Implementing Agency: Chief Executive Officer, Public Works Director, or other officer authorized by the governing board.

The undersigned affirms that their agency will be the “Implementing Agency” for the project if funded with ATP funds and they are the Chief Executive Officer, Public Works Director, or other officer authorized by their governing board with the authority to commit the agency’s resources and funds. They are also affirming that the statements contained in this application package are true and complete to the best of their knowledge. For infrastructure projects, the undersigned affirms that they are the manager of the public right-of-way facilities (responsible for their maintenance and operation) or they have authority over this position.

Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ________________________________________ Name: Ann James Phone: 925 671 5261
Title: Public Works Director e-mail: [email protected] For projects with a Partnering Agency: Chief Executive Officer or other officer authorized by the governing board. (For use only when appropriate) The undersigned affirms that their agency is committed to partner with the “Implementing Agency” and agrees to assume the responsibility for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the facility upon completion by the implementing agency and they intend to document such agreement per the CTC guidelines. The undersigned also affirms that they are the Chief Executive Officer, Public Works Director, or other officer authorized by their governing board with the authority to commit the agency’s resources and funds.

They are also affirming that the statements contained in this application package are true and complete to the best of their knowledge.

Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ________________________________________ Name: _____________________________________ Phone: ________________________________________ Title: _____________________________________ e-mail: ________________________________________ Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 102 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 103 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 104 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 105 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 106 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 107 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 108 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 109 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 110 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 111 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 112 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 113 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 114 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 115 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 116 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 117 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 118 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 119 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 120 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 121 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 122 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 123 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 124 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 125 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 126 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 127 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 128 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 129 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 130 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 131 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 132 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 133 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 134 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 135 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 136 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 137 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 138 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 139 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 140 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

BOYD RD

MONUMENT BLVD CONTRA COSTA BLVD
8'
11'
11'
11' 11' 11' 11'
11'
11'
Contra Costa Blvd
between Monument Blvd & Boyd Rd
Figure 1
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONAL
DETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.

CONTRA COSTA BLVD

CONCEPT PLAN
1:80
LEGEND

CURB LINE

SHARED USE PATH

CURB EXTENSION

BICYCLE CONFLICT

ZONE MARKING

PROPOSED RED CURB

EXISTING CURB TO REMOVE PROPOSED CURB RAMP

SEPARATED BIKE LANE PROPOSED BIKE RAMP

PROPOSED

RECTANGULAR RAPID

FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

PROPOSED RAILING

PROPOSED

RETRACTABLE BOLLARD

BUS STOP
B
B

MODIFY SIGNAL TO SEPARATE

NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURNS

FROM PEDESTRIANS AND

CYCLISTS IN EAST AND SOUTH
CROSSWALKS.

MODIFY SIGNAL TO SEPARATE

SOUTHBOUND RIGHT TURNS FROM

PEDESTRIANS AND CYCLISTS IN
WEST AND NORTH CROSSWALKS.

PROHIBIT EASTBOUND RIGHT
TURN ON RED.

PROPOSED SHARED-USE

PATH ON MONUMENT
BOULEVARD.

MAINTAIN EXISTING
BUS STOP LOCATION.

INSTALL MARKED
CROSSWALK.

WIDEN SIDEWALK.

WIDEN SIDEWALK.

REDESIGN DRIVEWAY TO

PROVIDE RAISED SEPARATED
BIKE LANE AND CROSSWALK.

Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 141 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

W HOOKSTON RD CONTRA COSTA BLVD

EBMUD TRAIL

EXISTING EBMUD TRAIL
11' 11' 11'
10' 11' 11'
12'
Contra Costa Blvd
between Boyd Rd & W Hookston Rd
Figure 2
1:80
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONAL
DETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.

CONTRA COSTA BLVD

CONCEPT PLAN
LEGEND

CURB LINE

SHARED USE PATH

CURB EXTENSION

BICYCLE CONFLICT

ZONE MARKING

PROPOSED RED CURB

EXISTING CURB TO REMOVE PROPOSED CURB RAMP

SEPARATED BIKE LANE PROPOSED BIKE RAMP

PROPOSED

RECTANGULAR RAPID

FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

PROPOSED RAILING

PROPOSED

RETRACTABLE BOLLARD
B

BUS STOP

MAINTAIN EXISTING BUS STOP

LOCATION ON BUS BOARDING

ISLAND WITH RAILINGS AND
MARKED CROSSWALK.

PAINT RED CURB TO
ACCOMMODATE 90' BUS
PULL-IN ZONE.

INSTALL RAISED, HIGH

VISIBILITY CROSSWALK WITH

RECTANGULAR RAPID

FLASHING BEACONS (RRFBS)

FOR PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
SAFETY.

REPLACE EBMUD ACCESS GATE

WITH RETRACTABLE BOLLARD
WITH 8' OPENING ON EITHER

SIDE FOR SHARED-USE PATH
CONNECTION TO TRAIL.

REDESIGN DRIVEWAY TO

PROVIDE RAISED SEPARATED
BIKE LANE AND CROSSWALK.

MAINTAIN EXISTING
PARKING.

B

INSTALL DETECTABLE

WARNING SURFACE AT

ENTRANCE AND EXIT OF

WHERE SHARED USE PATH
MEETS SIDEWALK.

Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 142 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Concept Level Estimate of Construction Costs
Project: Monument Boulevard Shared-Use PathLocation: Contra Costa Boulevard segment between Crescent Plaza and Hookston RoadDate: 11/4/2024Project #: OK24-0559 Item No. Design Item Unit Unit Cost Quantity Estimate Assumption 1 Remove Existing Asphalt Concrete SF 6.00$ 7,300.00 43,800$ Assumed removing 2' of asphalt around new curb and gutter.2 Remove Existing Curb and Gutter LF 15.00$ 1,810.00 27,150$ Remove existing curb and gutter where sidewalk width is being extended. 70,950$
3 Thermoplastic Stripe LF 5.00$ 2,800.00 14,000$ Assumed re-striping of WBL and SBL cat tracks.4 12" Limit Line Stripe LF 7.00$ 311.00 2,177$ Assumed limit lines re-striped for EB, WB, SB approaches.5 High-Visibility Crosswalk EA 8,400.00$ 10.00 84,000$ Includes removal of existing markings and installation of new paint and striping. Assumed all existing crossings will be improved with project. 6 Thermoplastic Pavement Legend SF 10.00$ 420.00 4,200$ Assumed re-painting of pavement legends for EB, WB, SB approaches.7 Red Curb LF 5.00$ 210.00 1,050$ 50' of red curb at Crescent Plaza/Crescent Dr new far-side pull-out bus stop. 8 Green Thermoplastic SF 15.00$ 13,250.00 198,750$ Green thermoplastic for cycletrack along Contra Costa Blvd.9 Green Conflict Markings SF 35.00$ 1,320.00 46,200$ Green conflict markings along driveways for cycletrack along Contra Costa Blvd. 10 Thermoplastic Bicycle Lane Legend or Sharrow @ 14 Sq Ft each EA 140.00$ 26.00 3,640$ Thermoplastic bike lane legend for cycletrack along Contra Costa Blvd. 354,017$
11 Landscape Buffer SF 32.00$ 11,400.00 364,800$ Includes median hardscape and landscaping. Median lanscape along Monument. Assumed median along Contra Costa remains constant.12 Concrete Sidewalk SF 30.00$ 5,150.00 154,500$ Assumed sidewalk extension on southwest and northwest corners.13 Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 70.00$ 3,650.00 255,500$ Assumed new curb and gutter at new curb line. 14 Asphalt Overlay at New Curb SF 8.00$ 7,300.00 58,400$ Assumed 2' of asphalt overlay around new curb and gutter.15 ADA Curb Ramp EA 10,000.00$ 12.00 120,000$ Assumed all corner ramps will be improved with project.16 Major Signal Modification/New Signal Intersection 800,000.00$ 2.00 1,600,000$ Assumed major signal modification to separate northbound right turns from peds in east and south crosswalks.17 Asphalt Path SF 6.00$ 17,550.00 105,300$ Assumed asphalt path along cycle track.18 Concrete Driveway SF 30.00$ 2,250.00 67,500$ Includes curb extension past bikeway and ramp to road level. 1 driveway crossing cycle track along Contra Costa Blvd.19 Path Curb Ramp EA 15,000.00$ 8.00 120,000$ Path ramp across south crossing east of bike lane.20 Bus Stop Amenities EA 15,000.00$ 1.00 15,000$ Includes shelters, benches and lighting. Assumed a lump sum cost for bus stop improvements at the farside bus stop.21 Intersection Lighting Intersection 40,800.00$ 1.00 40,800$ Half of Monument/Contra Costa intersection will need new light poles. 22 Pedestrian Scale Lighting Mile $ 1,320,000.00 0.20 $ 264,000 Assumed pedestrian scale lighting along Contra Costa Blvd cycle track. 23 Bus Boarding Island Bus Stop 151,000.00$ 1.00 151,000$ Assumed a lump sum cost for bus stop improvements at the mid-block Contra Costa Blvd bus boarding island including railing and signage.24 Raised Crosswalk Crosswalk 30,000.00$ 1.00 30,000$ Raised crosswalk at W Hookston Rd crossing.25 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon Crosswalk 40,000.00$ 1.00 40,000$ RRFBs at W Hookston Rd crossing. Includes removal of existing markings, restriping, and other surface treatment. 26 Speed Hump/Cushion EA 10,000.00$ 2.00 20,000$ Includes roadway excavation, installation of new asphalt, necessary signage and markings. Assumed one on each direction of W Hookston Rd.27 Detectable Warning Surface SF 20.00$ 12.00 240$ Assumed at entrance and exit of where shared use path meets sidewalk.28 Tactile Directional Indicator LF 25.00$ 1,330.00 33,250$ Includes indicator strip as buffer between cycle track and sidewalk. 3,440,290$
386,500$ 193,250$ 579,750$ 386,500$ 386,500$
5,798,000$ 1,449,500$
7,248,000$
2,174,400$
GRAND TOTAL $ 9,422,400
Construction Total
Construction Sub-total
10%Traffic Control
Contingency
PA/ED/PS&E Costs
25%30%
Mobilization 10%

DEMOLITIONSOFT COSTS
SubtotalSubtotalSubtotal

SIGNING AND STRIPINGSTREET IMPROVEMENTS
10%15%Construction Management
Miscellaneous Drainage Improvements
Miscellaneous Utility Adjustment 5%
Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 143 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
LAPG -25I (Revised Apr 2026 v1.00) Date: 5/15/26
District County Route EA Project ID PPNO
04 CC
Project Title: Monument Boulevard & Contra Costa Boulevard Active Transportation Project

DO NOT FILL IN ANY SHADED AREAS
Proposed Total Project Cost ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Notes E&P (PA&ED) 930 930
PS&E 3,720 3,720

R/W SUP (CT)

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON 21,378 21,378
TOTAL 930 3,720 21,378 26,028
Summary of ATP Funding
ATP Funds Cycle 8 Infrastructure Project Program Code
Proposed Allocation FY, Funding in ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency E&P (PA&ED) 490 490 CTC
PS&E 3,280 3,280 Notes
R/W SUP (CT) PS&E is planned to commence on
CON SUP (CT) 7/1/2029.

R/W
CON-NI
CON 20,948 20,948
TOTAL 490 3,280 20,948 24,718
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
ATP Funds Cycle 8 Non-Infrastructure Project Program Code Proposed Allocation FY, Funding in ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency

E&P (PA&ED) CTC
PS&E Notes

R/W SUP (CT)

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON
TOTAL
ATP Funds Cycle 8 Plan Project Program Code
Proposed Allocation FY, Funding in ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency

E&P (PA&ED) CTC
PS&E Notes

R/W SUP (CT)

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON
TOTAL
Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 144 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
LAPG -25I (Revised Apr 2026 v1.00) Date: 5/15/26
ATP Funds Previous ATP Cycle Funding Program Code
Proposed Funding ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency

E&P (PA&ED) CTC
PS&E Notes

R/W SUP (CT)

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON
TOTAL
Summary of Non-ATP Funding
Fund No. 2: City of Pleasant Hill Local Match (5.03%) Program Code Committed Funding ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency E&P (PA&ED) 440 440 City of Pleasant Hill
PS&E 440 440 Notes
R/W SUP (CT) Measure K and Gas tax funding

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON 430 430
TOTAL 440 440 430 1,310
Fund No. 3: Program Code
Committed Funding ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency

E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E Notes

R/W SUP (CT)

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 4: Program Code
Committed Funding ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency

E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E Notes

R/W SUP (CT)

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON
TOTAL
Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 145 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ● DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
LAPG -25I (Revised Apr 2026 v1.00) Date: 5/15/26
Fund No. 5: Program Code
Committed Funding ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency

E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E Notes

R/W SUP (CT)

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 6: Program Code
Committed Funding ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency

E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E Notes

R/W SUP (CT)

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 7: Program Code
Committed Funding ($1,000s)
Component Prior 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 31-32+ Total Funding Agency

E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E Notes

R/W SUP (CT)

CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON-NI
CON
TOTAL
Item 9.5
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 146 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 1, 2026
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. __-26 APPROVING THE PARTICIPATION

OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL IN THE CONTRA COSTA

COUNTY REGIONAL ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE SYSTEM JOINT

POWERS AUTHORITY

SYNOPSIS
The San Francisco Bay Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP), originally adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board in 2009, establishes annual stormwater treatment requirements that must be met by cities, counties, and flood control districts across the San Francisco Bay Area. The MRP has been reissued twice since its inception, and each version has increased its regulatory compliance measures.

To help permittees address the increased measures, the CCCWP is proposing a Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) that would provide additional opportunities for participating jurisdictions to meet future MRP requirements.

The purpose of this item is to consider adopting a resolution approving the participation of the City of Pleasant Hill in the Contra Costa County RAC JPA.

DISCUSSION
Background
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit is a federal permit under the Clean Water Act that regulates the quality of stormwater runoff to prevent pollution to receiving water bodies. This requires public agencies to obtain a permit before discharging untreated stormwater into receiving waterways.

As a subset of the NPDES Permit, the MRP established enhanced stormwater management requirements. This includes expanded public outreach, watershed monitoring, illicit discharge control, and the installation and maintenance of trash capture devices.

To assist in achieving compliance with the MRP, the City of Pleasant Hill is a participant in the Contra Costa Clean Water Program (CCCWP), which enables Contra Costa cities, towns, and Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 147 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 unincorporated areas—collectively referred to as “permittees”—to implement local and countywide stormwater programs in a coordinated manner. The current version of the MRP (MRP

3.0), adopted on May 11, 2022, is expected to expire on June 30, 2027. With the anticipated issuance of the fourth iteration of the MRP (MRP 4.0), permittees will face increased challenges in meeting certain permit requirements, such as lack of funding and a dearth of usable space within the public right-of-way to install green stormwater infrastructure (GSI).

The current MRP 3.0 requirements includes, among others:
• Trash reduction goal of 100%
• Compliance with GSI numeric standards
• Reduction of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) levels
• Implementation of enhanced construction site stormwater inspections with PCB inspections during demolition
• Installation of low-impact stormwater design (LID) measures in new private development projects, such as bioretention basins and flow-through planters To help fund the work required under the MRP, the CCCWP sought legislative approval to collect a Stormwater Utility Assessment (SUA) on property tax bills. State Legislature authorized this assessment in 1993 by amending the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act. All permittees participate in the SUA except the cities of Richmond and Brentwood.

Over time, participating municipalities have increased the assessment to the maximum amount allowed by law. While SUA revenues are an important funding source, they alone are insufficient to fully meet MRP requirements.

In 2012, recognizing that expanding permit requirements would exceed available local funding, the CCCWP proposed a Stormwater Funding Initiative pursuant to Proposition 218. The proposed parcel tax was not approved by voters. As a result, municipalities have continued to face a significant funding shortfall in meeting MRP requirements.

City staff continues to work diligently towards achieving full compliance with the MRP with the current funding; however, the Water Board is expected to release a draft of the MRP4.0 for public review in 2027, which is expected to include more stringent standards, including an expanded GSI retrofit area, which is expected to increase the cost of compliance significantly.

GSI improvements are designed to disperse stormwater into vegetated areas, harvest and reuse runoff, promote infiltration, and treat stormwater before discharge into the bay. Retrofitting an existing public storm drain system requires redirecting stormwater runoff from existing hardscapes – such as streets, rooftops, and sidewalks (known as “impervious area”) – out of existing catch basins and into landscaped areas. In these areas, the water is treated using bioretention planters before being conveyed back into the storm drain network. The required size of each bioretention planter depends on how much impervious area drains into it. Because these systems must be added to areas that are already developed, there is limited flexibility in how much runoff each planter can Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 148 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 accommodate. For example, using the “four-percent” method, a drainage area of 1,000 square feet requires a bioretention area of at least 40 square feet to properly capture and treat runoff during a major storm event. This requirement further limits the already scarce public landscaping available.

The City is required under MRP 3.0 to retrofit 2.09 acres of impervious surface for stormwater treatment and has already completed projects treating 0.7 acres through the Contra Costa Boulevard Complete Streets Project. Planned improvements along Buskirk Avenue and Geary Road are expected to fully satisfy the City’s current compliance requirements.

Analysis
As a mostly built-out city, Pleasant Hill has limited space in the public right-of-way to build new projects, which makes meeting current and future MRP requirements challenging. Future permit updates are expected to increase current requirements. While staff is actively pursuing ordinance updates, grant funding, and future projects to maintain long-term compliance, participation in the RAC JPA would further support these efforts and provide an additional, cost-effective path to staying in compliance.

Joining the RAC JPA would provide the City with an opportunity to generate revenue by building green stormwater projects that go beyond required standards. If the City becomes a member, it could sell “compliance credits” to developers or other cities that need help meeting their stormwater requirements. In this arrangement, the City would design and build approved green infrastructure projects that exceed their MRP requirement threshold, and other parties could purchase credits from those projects that provide additional GSI retrofit area to satisfy their own MRP obligations. In this scenario, buyers would pay the municipality an upfront cost for the credits, along with an annual fee to help the municipality fund the ongoing upkeep of the projects.

The RAC JPA would establish a Community Facilities District (CFD), which is simply a way to collect annual fees to pay for long-term maintenance. Through the CFD, if another member of the JPA buys compliance credits from the City, they would also pay operation and maintenance (O&M) fees to help cover the cost of maintaining the green infrastructure projects that generate those credits. O&M payments can be structured either as an upfront lump-sum payment (typically calculated over a 30-year period) or as an ongoing annual payment. When using the lump-sum method, the amount is estimated based on the anticipated annual maintenance cost per unit, along with applicable escalation assumptions and contingency/safety factors. As a result, the total upfront O&M amount is calculated specifically for each individual project. This allows maintenance responsibilities to be shared and helps recover some of the costs of building and caring for public facilities.

The City’s excess treatment capacity from future GSI retrofit projects could be converted into revenue to help fund larger unfunded projects, including the Linda Ditch retrofit. The RAC JPA Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 149 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 would also create a Community Facilities District (CFD) to collect annual maintenance fees tied to these compliance credits, helping offset long-term operation and maintenance costs.

As a member of the RAC JPA and the CFD, the City would be able to sell compliance credits to other public agencies or private developers within Pleasant Hill, with pricing based on the longterm cost to maintain, repair, and replace each stormwater facility over its lifetime. The rationale behind the pricing of compliance purchases and maintenance cost bases is further explained in the Regional Alternative Compliance System Summary Report (see Attachment B).

The JPA will be established as a legally separate entity with liabilities independent of the participating permittees. A term sheet has been prepared by legal counsel (see Attachment D) that outlines the JPA’s powers, procedures for admitting new members, and the required legislative body approval process. To avoid pension-related liabilities, the JPA will appoint a contract manager who is not affiliated with any permittee, rather than hiring employees of a local government. Financial obligations will be limited to the JPA, and administrative costs will be shared equally among its members.

Joining the JPA at the outset is more cost-effective, as initial setup and outreach costs can be shared among the founding participants. As additional agencies join over time, these costs are expected to increase. If the City elects to include private developers within the CFD, ongoing administrative costs would also increase proportionally.

Member cities may withdraw from the RAC JPA at any time upon advance written notice and without penalty. However, any member electing to withdraw would remain responsible for any existing financial commitments related to RAC JPA projects or programs made prior to withdrawal. The JPA may continue operating as long as at least two member agencies remain.

Dissolution of the JPA requires agreement from all member agencies, after which any remaining funds and assets—following payment of outstanding debts and obligations—would be distributed proportionally based on each agency’s contributions.

FISCAL IMPACT
The one-time buy-in costs for the initial JPA members will range from $2,900 to $4,000, depending on the number of members involved. Continued participation in the RAC JPA will require the City to contribute to the JPA’s annual operating cost, which, under the Draft JPA Agreement, is shared equally among all member agencies unless modified by agreement (Draft JPA Agreement, Section 17). The amount of this cost will be presented separately upon confirmation of the final annual budget from the JPA Board.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 150 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Move to adopt the proposed resolution to approve participation in the CCCRAC JPA, authorize the CM to execute the JPA, direct staff to revise the existing stormwater ordinance to reflect RAC participation, and authorize staff to collaborate in support of RAC System implementation.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
None recommended.

If the City does not join the RAC JPA, it may face uncertainty regarding the funding and resources necessary to the satisfy future MRP requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in enforcement action by the Water Board, including a cease-and-desist order and fines of up to $10,000 per day.

ATTACHMENT(S)
Proposed Resolution - RAC JPA
Attachment A - RAC System Overview
Attachment B - RAC System Fact Sheet
Attachment C - RAC JPA Agreement (Term Sheet)
Prepared by: Laetitia Porta, Senior Civil Engineer
Approved by: Ann James, Public Works Director
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 151 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RESOLUTION NO. -26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL

APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REGIONAL

ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (RAC JPA) AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City is a Permittee under the Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (MRP), which requires the City to implement post‑construction stormwater treatment through Low Impact Development (LID)/Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) pursuant to Provision C.3; and WHEREAS, many development and redevelopment sites within the City face physical, topographic, utility, or space constraints that limit their ability to construct on‑site LID/GSI facilities to meet the full requirements of Provision C.3; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) System was developed as a legally authorized alternative compliance mechanism under MRP Provision C.3.e to provide flexibility and cost‑effective stormwater treatment options; and

WHEREAS, the RAC System allows for the construction of certified Off‑Site Green Stormwater Infrastructure projects that generate “compliance units,” which may be purchased by developers or public agencies when on‑site compliance is infeasible; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County RAC Joint Powers Authority (RAC JPA) has been formed pursuant to Government Code Section 6500 et seq. for the purpose of administering the RAC System, including certification of Off‑Site GSI projects, management of compliance transactions, funding of long‑term operations and maintenance, and oversight of reporting requirements; and

WHEREAS, participation in the RAC JPA provides the City with a cost‑effective and regionally coordinated approach to meeting stormwater regulatory requirements, including MRP Provisions C.3.d, C.3.j, and pollutant load reduction obligations such as PCBs TMDL C.12.c.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that,
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves the City’s participation in the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance Joint Powers Authority (RAC JPA) and authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Joint Powers Agreement in substantially the form presented, subject to minor modifications approved by the City Attorney.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby directs the City Manager, or designee, to collaborate with the RAC JPA in its implementation, including participation in RAC System governance, Off‑Site GSI project certification and verification, use of the RAC Tracking Tool, annual Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 152 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 reporting, and any local ordinance or procedural updates necessary to utilize the RAC System.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to take all administrative, procedural, and operational steps necessary to implement participation in the RAC System and maintain compliance with Municipal Regional Permit requirements.

SECTION 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 1st day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
ZAC SHESS, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
LYONE P. CONNER, City Clerk
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 153 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Contra Costa County Regional Alternative
Compliance System Overview
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 154 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Introduction
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 155 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 What Are the Challenges with the Existing System?
• The Municipal Regional
Stormwater Permit (MRP)
Provision C.3 requires low
impact development
(LID)/green stormwater
infrastructure (GSI) to be
implemented:
– On new development and
redevelopment projects
– To retrofit a proportion of
permittee impervious surfaces
(C.3.j)
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 156 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 What Are the Challenges with the Existing System?
Challenges:
• Some re/development sites
have physical or site use
constraints to implement GSI
• Distributed GSI is costly and
requires considerable effort to
maintain
• Legacy pollution is
concentrated in certain areas
of Contra Costa County
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 157 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 How can Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC)
address these challenges?
• The RAC System allows an off-site option for new and
redevelopment projects to meet MRP C.3 requirements
– Other regulated stormwater dischargers may also participate (e.g.

Caltrans, Phase II permittees, etc.)
• The RAC System allows for investment in regional GSI projects that:
– Are cheaper to implement and maintain per acre treated – Can be located to target legacy pollution in the County – Could provide additional multiple benefits
AND
• The RAC System establishes designated O&M funding to
ensure long-term performance of facilities
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 158 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System
Development
Process
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 159 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 What is the Legal Basis for Alternative Compliance?
• Alternative compliance systems
are legally enabled through
existing rules, guidance, and plans
• Contra Costa County (CCC) RAC
System was developed in input
from:
– CCC Permittees
– Advisory Committee made from nine
SF Bay Area Counties + Caltrans +
Port of Oakland
– Water Quality Control Board and
EPA
– Internal and external Legal
Reviewers
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 160 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Regional Water Board
• The Water Board has approved
the Contra Costa County RAC
System under the current MRP
Provision C.3.e “alternative
compliance”
• RAC System reporting will be
delivered to Water Board at a
specified frequency each permit
term
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 161 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System
Implementation
Process
System Overview and
Participant Roles
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 162 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Contra Costa County RAC System Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 163 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System Participants - Sellers
• Design, construct, and maintain Off-Site GSI projects • Request certification of compliance units by the RAC System • Receive payment once compliance units are sold
• Receive reimbursement for O&M performed
• May include:
– MRP Permittees
– Contractors/Developers
– Community Based Public-Private Partnerships (CBP3)
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 164 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System Participants - Buyers
• Purchase compliance units for their compliance purposes • Pay an ongoing O&M Fee
• May include:
– Developers
– MRP Permittees
– Other parties subject to NPDES Permits (Caltrans, Phase II permittees, etc.)
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 165 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System Participants –
Jurisdictions/Permittees (Facilitator)
 Approve use of RAC System (i.e., City Council resolution)  Update Stormwater Ordinance to include RAC system
For Off-Site Projects in their boundary:
• Assist with Off-Site GSI Project Certification
• Enter data into RAC System Tracking Tool
• Perform On-Going GSI Project Verification
• Receive payment for these duties
Off-Site GSI Project in Jurisdiction A Jurisdiction A performs these actions Off-Site GSI Projects
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 166 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System Participants –
Jurisdictions/Permittees (Facilitator)
For Buyers:
• Approve use of RAC System by Buyer
• Help identify Compliance Units available for private Buyers • Facilitate Compliance Purchase, Agreements, and Ongoing O&M Fee for these private Buyers
• Receive payment for these RAC System duties
When a Buyers project is
located in Jurisdiction A
Jurisdiction A
facilitates these
transactions
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 167 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System Participants - Administrator
• Provides oversight for RAC System actions/transactions • Oversight of the RAC System fund
• Manages Tracking Tool
• Manages annual reporting to Water Board
• Performs adaptive management of RAC System
• Receives administrative payments to cover these duties Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 168 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System Participants – Community Facilities
District*
• Collects ongoing O&M Fees from Buyers
• Manages O&M Fund
• Disburses payments for O&M performed on Off-Site GSI
Projects
• CFD may not apply to permittee when acting as Buyers (would use agreement)
* Or Equivalent Mechanism
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 169 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Public Agency to Developer Exchange
+
Compliance Purchase ($$)
Seller
Payment for Compliance Units Purchased ($$)
Reimbursement for
O&M Performed ($$)
Seller requests
certification of
compliance units
O&M Fee
($$)
Contra Costa County RAC System
Buyer
Seller Designs, Constructs, and
Maintains Off-Site GSI Project
Compliance Units
Off-Site GSI Project
Certification
Data Entry into RAC
System Tracking Tool
Off-site GSI Project
Ongoing O&M
Verification
Off-Site GSI Project
Compliance Units are
Available for
Purchase
Buyer makes one-time
Compliance Purchase
Buyer pays ongoing O&M Fees
through RAC System Agreement
Community Facilities
District or other
Mechanism
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 170 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System
Implementation
Process
Compliance Units Costs
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 171 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Buyer Compliance Purchase
• Buyer purchases Equivalent Acres Greened compliance units proportional to their compliance needs
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶
= 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐴𝐴 𝐺𝐺 𝐺𝐺 × 𝑁𝑁 𝑁𝑁 𝑅𝑅 𝑅𝑅 × 𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 + 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 • The compliance purchase amount is determined by:
– The cost per equivalent acre greened for the units purchased – An administrative payment
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 172 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Equivalent Acres Greened Cost Basis: Capital Cost
• How much do we expect compliance units to cost?
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 173 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Equivalent Acres Greened Cost Basis: Capital Cost
• How much do we expect Equivalent Acres Greened
compliance units to cost? Based on a cost study, not including administrative fees, for non-infiltrating facilities:
– Regional Off-Site GSI Projects - estimated $120,000 per compliance unit
– Regional Off-Site GSI Projects (for drainage area less than 100 acres):
$235,000 per compliance unit
– Green Street/LID Off-Site GSI Projects - estimated $460,000 - $500,000+ per compliance unit
• A cost study will determine the administrative fees
– These are expected to be $2,000 - $6,000 per project and may vary by jurisdiction. These are preliminary estimates that need to be verified.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 174 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Equivalent Acres Greened Cost Basis: Ongoing
O&M Fee
• The Rate & Method Apportionment (RMA) would determine the ongoing O&M fee amount.
• Based on the estimated O&M cost for the units purchased • O&M costs would be collected via property taxes process for private properties
• O&M costs would be collected by agreement for permittees Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 175 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Next Steps for
Implementation
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 176 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Contra Costa County RAC System Roll-Out
Phase 1: Initial pilot
exchange within
Contra Costa County
2024
Phase 2: 3-year
initial roll-out across
Contra Costa County
2026 - 2029
Phase 3+: Fully
operational
2029/2030+
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 177 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System
Implementation
Process
Off-Site GSI Project
Verification &
Buyer Approval
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 178 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Off-Site Project Certification/Verification
• Off-Site GSI Project design and
installation must be “certified”
through inspection by local
jurisdiction using current certification
practices
• Off-Site GSI Projects generate
compliance units based on the area
treated by the Off-Site GSI Project
– Must be “GSI” per the MRP (infiltration,
capture and use, or bioretention)
– Must meet MRP Provision C.3.d (i.e.,
80% capture)
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 179 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Off-Site Project Certification/Verification
• Off-Site GSI Project must
undergo ongoing recurring
verification to confirm it is
performing as expected over time
– Local jurisdiction would perform
verification using current
verification practices
– Local jurisdiction would receive
payment for these actions
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 180 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Buyer Project Approval
• Developers/C.3 Regulated Projects
that want to purchase compliance
units will need to get approval from
the relevant jurisdiction
– This will be done through the
development approval process
• Developers can use the system to
address compliance for small
portions of a C.3 regulated project
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 181 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System
Implementation
Process
Ongoing O&M
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 182 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Community Facilities District
• A RAC JPA will adopt a CFD
– Resolution of Intention
– Public Hearing Process
• Election: Each property that will use the RAC System for compliance will be required to “elect” to be part of the CFD • Special tax is levied by ordinance adoption by the relevant legislative body
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 183 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Community Facilities District
• Roles and responsibilities for O&M
– Off-Site facilities will be required to maintain their facility in accordance with the Site’s O&M Agreement
– Off-Site facilities will be inspected to verify O&M compliance • Funding
– Once a facility is confirmed to meet their O&M requirement the OffSite facility will submit O&M certification to RAC System – The O&M payment will be issued to the Off-Site facility Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 184 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System
Implementation
Process
Compliance Unit
Calculation
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 185 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Compliance Unit Generation
• “Equivalent Acres Greened” compliance units
– Calculated based on pollutant generating area
• 100% impervious + 10% pervious area
– Rainfall zone and land use associated with each unit
• For MRP C.3 Regulated Projects:
– To meet “equivalency” and “Net Environmental Benefit” requirements of Provision C.3.e., there are three additional factors used to calculate total “Equivalent Acres Greened”

1. Rainfall Ratio

2. Pollutant Ratio

3. Net Environmental Benefit (NEB) Ratio
– These factors not required for permittee C.3.j retrofit compliance units Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 186 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Compliance Unit Generation: Rainfall Zone
• Used PRISM data to map the County’s Rainfall Zones
• Maps and tables were developed to represent the Rainfall Zones and calculate Rainfall Ratios
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 187 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Compliance Unit Generation: Rainfall Zone Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 188 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Compliance Unit Generation: Land Use Area
• Extensive analysis completed to develop ratios to represent the difference in urban pollutant loading between land uses Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 189 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Compliance Unit Generation: Net Environmental
Benefit
• The CCC RAC System has defined the standard Regulated Project NEB as a ratio of 1.1:1 (i.e., requiring purchase of 10% additional Equivalent Acres Greened)
Project Type Compliance Unit Land Use NEB Ratio
C.3.d Regulated
Project
Residential, Commercial,
Institutional or Transportation Standard - 1.1:1
C.3.d Regulated
Project Old Industrial Discounted - 1:1
C.3.j Retrofit
Requirement N/A NEB not required
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 190 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Compliance Unit Generation
• Detailed calculations on the compliance unit are provided in the System Summary Report
• Equivalent Acres Greened generated for Off-site GSI Projects and required purchase amount for Regulated Projects will be calculated through the RAC System Tracking Tool
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 191 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RAC System
Tracking Tool
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 192 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Overview of Tracking Tool
• Tracks compliance units generated and certified
• Tracks seller and buyer information
• Tracks exchanges, including number of compliance units purchased and total purchase amount
• Includes a ledger to track the compliance units sold and available for sale for each Off-Site GSI project
• Tracks O&M performed and reimbursements for O&M
• Tracks ongoing verification of compliance units
• Acts as a repository for documentation for all of the above Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 193 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Thank You!
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 194 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Project Background
The Cities of San Pablo, and Walnut Creek, and unincorporated Contra Costa County have partnered with USEPA through a San Francisco Bay Water Quality Improvement Fund grant to develop and pilot a Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) System within Contra Costa County (the “Contra Costa County RAC System”). Entities in Contra Costa County must comply with the substantial post-construction stormwater treatment (i.e., Provision C.3) requirements of the San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP). Alternative Compliance Systems have been used in other areas of the United States to help municipalities, developers, and industry meet rigorous stormwater compliance requirements. The Water Board and legal reviewers were involved in developing the Contra Costa County RAC System.

What is the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) System? The Contra Costa County RAC System is a program designed to provide a flexible, cost-effective, and scientifically defensible MRP C.3 compliance option to implement required post-construction stormwater treatment off-site.

How does the Contra Costa County RAC System work?
The Contra Costa County RAC System allows green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) treatment facilities or “Off-Site GSI Projects” to be constructed within the County to generate “compliance units” that can be exchanged through the System.

Compliance units can be sold to an interested party (i.e., a developer or municipality) in need of off-site stormwater treatment for MRP compliance.

A seller would design and
construct the Off-Site GSI
Projects that generate Contra
Costa County RAC System
compliance units. Off-Site GSI
Projects require certification
through the Contra Costa
County RAC System before
compliance units can be sold.

A buyer would pay for Contra
Costa County RAC System
compliance units to satisify
their project’s stormwater
compliance needs by
completing a “compliance
purchase”. Buyers would pay
an additional annual fee to
cover the ongoing operations
and maintenance (O&M) of
the Off-Site GSI Projects that
generate compliance units.

What does it mean
to be a “buyer”?
What does it mean
to be a “seller”?
Regional Alternative
Compliance System

PUBLIC FACT SHEET
Contra Costa County
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 195 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 The Contra Costa County RAC System provides equivalency calculations, template agreements, and an online RAC System Tracking Tool to help interested parties
determine their treatment requirements and complete
transactions through the buying and selling of compliance units.

Why is this important? What is the benefit of a
RAC System?
The Contra Costa County RAC System provides an
opportunity for the strategic development, siting, and
funding of larger regional stormwater treatment facilities (regional Off-Site GSI Projects) in areas with greater
legacy pollutant concerns. Regional stormwater treatment facilities are sited and designed to treat large drainage areas ranging from tens to hundreds of acres.

The Contra Costa County RAC System is also expected
to achieve cost savings for participants as larger stormwater treatment facilities typically have reduced capital and O&M costs per treated acre.

Who might be interested in participating?
Developers - Some development
and redevelopment sites may have
constraints (size, steep grades, etc.) that
make it difficult to build on-site stormwater
treatment. When a project has difficulty
building MRP-required stormwater
treatment on-site, it can use the Contra
Costa County RAC System to comply
with the MRP.

Municipalities - Municipalities may
purchase compliance units to comply
with MRP Provision C.3.j impervious
surface retrofit requirements.

Additionally, municipalities with
Regulated Projects such as large road
reconstruction projects could use the
Contra Costa County RAC System to
comply with the MRP. Municipalities may
also act as “sellers” through the Contra
Costa County RAC System.

Non-profits - Non-profits or other
environmental organizations may be
interested in building GSI facilities
that can be partially funded by selling
compliance units through the Contra
Costa County RAC System.

Contractors - Developers or contractors
may be interested in building Off-Site GSI
Projects to generate compliance units
that can be sold through the Contra Costa
County RAC System.

Next Steps
In 2023 and 2024, the first Contra Costa County
RAC System exchange will be conducted as a pilot,
and System administration processes will be further
developed. The Contra Costa County RAC System is
anticipated to be operational for additional exchanges
by the end of 2024.

More Details on Off-Site GSI
Projects:

Off-Site GSI Projects must be non-regulated, that is,
not required as part of any development project or
“Regulated Project” as defined by the MRP.

The compliance units generated by an Off-Site GSI
Project are calculated based on the acres and land
use that it treats.

Off-Site GSI Projects require ongoing verification,
consistent with processes used for existing GSI
facilities, and are eligible to receive annual operation and maintenance payments so they are properly
maintained.

Regional Alternative
Compliance System

PUBLIC FACT SHEET
Contra Costa County
For more information, please visit the Contra Costa County RAC System Project Website:
www.sanpabloca.gov/2685/Regional-Alternative-Compliance Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 196 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -1- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc

JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
Between Participating Cities, Contra Costa County, and the Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for
Implementation of the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance System This Joint Powers Agreement (“Agreement”) dated July 1, 2026, is made and entered into pursuant to the provisions of Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 5, Article 1 (Section 6500 et seq.) of the California Government Code relating to the joint exercise of powers among [INSERT FINAL LIST OF PARTICIPATING AGENCIES] (collectively, “Member Agencies” and each, individually, a “Member Agency”). The term “Member Agencies” shall also include a public agency added to this Agreement in accordance with Section 14.

RECITALS
A. The joint powers authority (“JPA”) formed pursuant to this Agreement to administer the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance (“RAC”) System is authorized to (i) establish a community facilities district pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (“Mello-Roos Act”) in order to finance on-going maintenance costs for “Off-Site GSI Projects” constructed pursuant to the RAC System, and (ii) take other actions in furtherance of the RAC System.

B. The RAC System is a program designed to offer a flexible, cost-effective, and scientifically defensible compliance option for the Municipal Regional Permit’s development provisions requiring post-construction stormwater treatment. The Municipal Regional Permit is a Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Permit No. CAS612008.

C. The RAC System allows the owners of regulated developments and certain public agencies (buyers) to purchase “compliance units” in green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) treatment facilities or “Off-Site GSI Projects” constructed elsewhere within the County.

D. The developers of the Off-Site GSI Projects, which may be public agencies or private entities, generate the “compliance units” that can be exchanged through the RAC System and purchased by the buyers (owners of the regulated developments and public agencies that cannot treat stormwater on their own sites). Private buyers will contribute to the cost of operating and maintaining the Off-Site GSI Projects by annexing their development sites into the proposed community facilities district formed by the JPA. Public agencies that are buyers will pay fees directly to the JPA as an alternative funding mechanism because such public agencies cannot be levied a special tax under the proposed community facilities district.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 197 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -2- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions hereinafter set forth, it is agreed by and among the Member Agencies as follows:

1. DEFINITIONS
Capitalized terms used in the Agreement shall have the meanings specified below, unless the context requires otherwise.

1.1 “Act” means the Joint Exercise of Powers Act of the State of California (Government Code Section 6500 et seq.).

1.2 “Agreement” means this Joint Powers Agreement.

1.3 “Board” means the Board of Directors for the Joint Powers Authority.

1.4 “Effective Date” means the date on which this Agreement shall become effective and the JPA shall exist as a separate public agency, as further described in Section 5.

1.5 “JPA” means the Joint Powers Authority.

1.6 “Off-Site GSI Project” means a green stormwater infrastructure project eligible to exchange compliance credits under the RAC System.

1.7 “RAC System” means the Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance System.

2. RESERVED

3. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish an independent public agency in order to exercise powers common to each Member Agency and any other powers granted to the JPA under the Act. The JPA shall administer the RAC System.

4. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE JPA

4.1 Separate Legal Entity. The JPA, as a joint powers authority, is a separate entity from the Member Agencies and is responsible for the administration of this Agreement.

4.2 Filing of Notices with Secretary of State and County Clerk. Within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement, the JPA shall cause a notice of this Agreement to be prepared and filed with the office of the California Secretary of State and the State Controller containing the information required by California Government Code Section 6503.5.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 198 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -3- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc

4.3 Filing of Notices with County and LAFCO. Within seventy (70) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement, the JPA shall cause a statement of the information concerning the JPA, required by California Government Code Section 53051, to be filed with the office of the California Secretary of State, the Contra Costa County Clerk, and the Contra Costa County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) stating the facts required to be stated pursuant to subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 53051.

5. TERM
The Agreement shall become effective upon the earlier date of July 1, 2026, provided that two Member Agencies have executed the Agreement by such date, or when all Member Agencies have executed the Agreement (“Effective Date”). The Agreement will remain effective until the JPA is dissolved through procedures outlined in Section 18 of this Agreement.

6. POWERS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE JPA

6.1 General Powers. The JPA shall have the power in its own name to exercise any and all common powers of its Member Agencies and such additional powers accorded to it by law reasonably related to the purposes of the JPA, including, but not limited to, the powers to:
a. Acquire, lease, construct, own, manage, maintain, dispose of or operate (subject to the limitations herein) any buildings, works or improvements within the boundaries of the Member Agencies deemed necessary by the Board to implement the RAC System; b. Acquire, hold, manage, maintain, or dispose of any other property within the boundaries of the Member Agencies by any lawful means, including without limitation gift, purchase, lease, lease-purchase, license, eminent domain or sale to support the RAC System; c. Seek, receive, and administer funding from any available public, nonprofit, foundation or private source, including grants or loans under any available Federal, State and local programs to support the RAC System;
d. Make and enter into other contracts;
e. Form and implement one or more community facilities districts pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (“Mello-Roos Act”); f. Incur all authorized debts, liabilities, and obligations, subject to the limitations herein to accomplish the stated purposes and objectives of the JPA; g. Receive gifts, contributions and donations of property, funds, services and other forms of financial or other assistance from any persons, firms, corporations or governmental entities;
h. Sue and be sued in its own name;
i. Seek the adoption or defeat of any Federal, State or local legislation or regulation necessary or desirable to accomplish the stated purposes and objectives of the JPA; Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 199 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -4- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc
j. Adopt rules, regulations, policies, bylaws and procedures governing the operation of the JPA;
k. Invest money pursuant to California Government Code Section 6505.5 that is not required for the immediate necessities of the JPA, as the JPA determines is advisable, in the same manner and upon the same conditions as local agencies, pursuant to Section 53601 of the California Government Code as it now exists or may hereafter be amended; l. Carry out and enforce all the provisions of this Agreement; and m. Exercise all other powers not specifically mentioned herein, but common to Member Agencies, and authorized by California Government Code Section 6508 as it now exists or may hereafter be amended.

6.2 Specific Powers and Obligations. The JPA shall have the power in its own name to exercise the following specific powers and obligations to:
a. Conduct an audit of the records and accounts of the JPA annually by an independent certified public accountant and ensure that copies of such audit report shall be filed with the State Controller and the County Auditor, and shall be provided to the Member Agencies no later than fifteen (15) days after receipt of such audit reports by the JPA; b. Use any statutory power available to it necessary or desirable to finance the exercise of any power of the JPA; and
c. Defend, hold harmless and indemnify, to the fullest extent permitted by law, each Member Agency from any liability, claims, suits or other actions.

7. BOARD OF DIRECTORS

7.1 JPA Governing Board. The JPA shall be governed by a Board of Directors. Each director shall have a single vote on matters coming before the Board.

7.2 Board Members and Alternates. Within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement, each Member Agency shall designate and appoint one its officers, officials, or employees to serve as its representative on the Board. Within thirty (30) days after a new Member Agency becomes a party to this Agreement, the Member Agency shall designate and appoint one of its officers, officials, or employees to serve as its representative on the Board.

Each Member Agency may appoint an alternate representative who is authorized to serve on the Board only in the absence of the Member Agency’s primary representative, with the same authority as the primary representative. All primary representatives and alternates shall serve until they are replaced by the appointing Member Agency, or until the withdrawal of the Member Agency from this Agreement, or until such time as they are no longer an officer, official, or employee of the Member Agency. Board members and their alternates shall serve without compensation, but they shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses they actually incur in connection with their service on the Board, provided such expense is authorized in advance by the Board.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 200 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -5- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc

7.3 Qualifications. Each Member Agency shall determine the officers, officials, or employees that will serve as the Member Agency’s primary representative, and their alternate, on the Board of Directors.

7.4 Board Officers. The Board shall annually select one of its members to serve as Chair and another member to serve as Vice Chair.
a. If the Chair is unable to continue serving on the Board, then the ViceChair shall become Chair. The Board shall then select a new Vice Chair from among the remaining members of the Board.
b. If the Vice Chair is unable to continue serving on the Board, the Board shall select a new Vice Chair from among the remaining members of the Board. c. The Chair shall preside over all meetings of the Board and perform such other duties as may be imposed by the Board in accordance with applicable law and this Agreement.
d. The Vice-Chair shall preside over all meetings of the Board in the Chair’s absence and perform such other duties as may be imposed by the Board in accordance with applicable law and this Agreement when the Chair is absent.

7.5 Additional Officers and Consultants. The Board may appoint any additional officers deemed necessary or desirable. The Board may also retain such consultants or independent contractors as may be deemed necessary.

7.6 Bonding Requirements. The officers or persons designated to have charge of, handle, or have access to any funds or property of the JPA shall be so designated and empowered by the Board. Each such officer or person may be required to file an official bond with the JPA in an amount established by the Board.

7.7 Subcommittees. The Board may create permanent or ad hoc subcommittees to give advice to the Board on such matters as may be referred to such subcommittee by the Board.

7.8 Meetings. The Board shall hold publicly noticed meetings in accordance with a schedule established by the Board. The Board shall meet no less than once per year. Meetings shall be conducted and noticed in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act.

7.9 Voting. All voting powers of the JPA shall reside in the Board.

7.10 Quorum; Votes for Board Actions. A majority of the members of the Board, or their alternates, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except that less than a quorum of the Board may adjourn a meeting for lack of quorum. Except as provided in Section 14 or where a larger affirmative vote is required by law, any action of the Board shall require an affirmative vote of a majority of the Directors present at a meeting, provided that a quorum of the Board is present.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 201 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -6- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc

7.11 Approval of Annual Budget. The JPA’s fiscal year shall begin July 1 of each calendar year, and it shall end on June 30 of the next calendar year; provided, however, that the JPA’s first fiscal year shall begin the date this Agreement becomes effective, and it shall end on the June 30 occurring thereafter. In each fiscal year after the first fiscal year, prior to April 1 of each year, the Manager shall prepare and present a proposed budget for the following fiscal year to the Board for its review and consideration; and prior to July 1 of each year, the Board shall consider approving the final budget for the following fiscal year.

7.12 Minutes. The Secretary shall cause minutes of all meetings of the Board to be drafted. Upon approval by the Board, such minutes shall become a part of the official records of the JPA.

7.13 Conflicts of Interest.
a. California Political Reform Act. Board members shall be considered “public officials” within the meaning of the California Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended, and its regulations, for purposes of financial disclosure, conflict of interest and other requirements of such Act.
b. Levine Act. Board members are “officials” within the meaning of California Government Code Section 84308 (the “Levine Act”) and subject to the restrictions of such act on the acceptance, solicitation or direction of contributions.

8. POWERS AND DUTIES OF GOVERNING BOARD

8.1 Powers and Duties. In addition to exercising the powers and obligations of the JPA set forth in Section 6, or as otherwise provided by law, the JPA Board of Directors shall have the following powers:
a. Perform the activities described in Section 8.2 with respect to the community facilities district described therein;
Perform activities necessary and convenient to assist Member Agencies comply with the Municipal Regional Permit and to implement the RAC System, including filing required documentation with the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board; b. Review and recommend an annual budget to the Member Agencies, which shall include the proposed contribution from each Member Agency; c. Make and enter into contracts or sub-contracts, and authorize by resolution officers or agents to execute such contracts;
d. Incur debt, liabilities and obligations on behalf of the JPA as authorized by law;
e. Invest JPA funds pursuant to an investment policy of the JPA adopted by the Board of Directors;
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 202 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -7- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc
f. Receive contributions, donations or grants of property, funds, services, or other forms of assistance from any source;
g. Coordinate JPA activities with other Joint Powers Authorities or public agencies established for similar purposes in pursuing the common purposes set forth above; h. Appoint a Legal Advisor for the JPA;
i. Appoint, suspend and or terminate the Manager or enter into and terminate agreements for Management Services;
j. Appoint a Secretary;
k. Adopt, and amend from time to time, bylaws, rules, and regulations for the conduct of meetings of the Board and of the affairs of the JPA consistent with this Agreement; and
l. Adopt, and amend from time to time, a conflict of interest code.

8.2 Community Facilities District. The Board of Directors will consider forming a community facilities district (“CFD”) in accordance with the Mello-Roos Act. If a CFD is formed by the Board, the following will apply:
a. The CFD will levy special taxes on development sites owned by private buyers to finance maintenance of Off-Site GSI Projects. Off-Site GSI Projects may be publiclyowned or privately-owned. The JPA is authorized and empowered to enter into agreements with owners of Off-Site GSI Projects to provide for CFD funding of maintenance. b. The CFD will initially be formed to include (i) original CFD boundaries that consist of a single property within the jurisdiction of one of the Member Agencies, and (ii) a future annexation area that includes the remaining territory of the initial Member Agencies. c. As additional public agencies join the CFD, the Board of Directors will consider adding such agencies’ territory to the CFD’s future annexation area. d. Private buyers may annex their properties into the CFD from the future annexation area. Member agencies will not need to approve annexations from the future annexation area into the CFD.
e. The Board of Directors will be responsible for considering the levy of special taxes to fund maintenance of Off-Site GSI Projects and administering the CFD. The Board of Directors may engage necessary consultants to assist with the formation and administration of a CFD.
f. The Board of Directors shall be responsible for preparing and approving all reports and notices required by the Mello-Roos Act. The Board of Directors may delegate to the Manager, or contract with another person or entity, the preparation of reports and notices Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 203 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -8- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc
required by the Mello-Roos Act, provided that the Board of Directors retains discretion to approve the reports and notices prior to submission, circulation, or publication.

9. OPERATIONS AND FACILITIES

9.1 Principal Office. The principal physical office of the JPA shall be established by Board resolution at one of the Member Agencies’ offices or at another suitable location within a Member Agency’s jurisdiction.

9.2 Assumption of Responsibilities by the JPA. As soon as practicable after the Effective Date of this Agreement, a notice of an organizational meeting of the Board shall be published. During the first meeting, the Board shall designate a Manager, or engage a contractor to perform Management Services, who shall have the authority described in Section 11 and as otherwise delegated by the Board.

9.3 Delegation of Authority; Transfer of Records, Accounts, Funds and Property.

The JPA shall establish procedures by which it may receive the transfer of records, accounts, funds or property from Member Agencies or other entities.

10. NO EMPLOYEES

10.1 The JPA shall not hire employees or retain consultants that could otherwise be classified as common law employees.

11. MANAGER OF THE JPA

11.1 Powers and Duties. The Manager contracted by the Agency may be a staff person of one of the Member Agencies, a consultant, an independent contractor, or an employee of another entity who can perform the responsibilities and duties described in this section JPA, as determined by the Board in its sole discretion. The Manager shall have the following powers, responsibilities and duties:
a. Plan, coordinate and supervise the operation of the JPA on a day-to-day basis to ensure that the policies and direction of the Board are implemented operationally and administratively;
b. Make recommendations to the Board regarding the operations of the JPA and, if formed, the CFD;
c. Supervise and manage JPA contractors;
d. Establish administrative policies and procedures for the JPA consistent with and in order to implement directives from the Board; e. Prepare the annual budget for submission to the Board; f. Support compliance activities for the Member Agencies’ compliance with the Municipal Regional Permit through the RAC System; and Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 204 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -9- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc
g. Such other powers and authority delegated by the Board.

12. TREASURER AND AUDITOR

12.1 The Auditor of the JPA shall be the duly [elected / appointed] [Auditor / AuditorController] of [insert Member Agency]. The Auditor shall draw warrants or check-warrants against funds of the JPA held by the Treasurer when the demands are approved by the Board of Directors or other person designated for that purpose and delegated that authority. The Board may transfer the responsibilities of Auditor to any person or entity authorized by Government Code Section 6505.5.

12.2 12.3 The Treasurer of the JPA shall be the duly [elected / appointed] [Treasurer / Treasurer-Tax Collector] of [insert Member Agency]. The Treasurer shall receive, have custody of, and disburse of all monies of the JPA. The Board may transfer the responsibilities of Treasurer to any person or entity authorized by Government Code Section 6505.5.

13. INSURANCE AND LIABILITY

13.1 Insurance Coverage. The JPA shall be responsible for obtaining insurance coverage for its activities, as the Board deems appropriate.

13.2 Limitation on Liability. Except as expressly authorized by the Member Agencies, no Member Agency shall be responsible for the acts and omissions of another Member Agency’s officers or employees nor shall a Member Agency incur any liabilities arising out of the services and activities of another Member Agency’s officers or employees.

14. ADDITION OF MEMBER AGENCIES
The addition of any other agency as a Member Agency to the JPA shall require the approval of three-quarters of the entire Board. Upon approval by the Board, the new Member Agency shall execute a copy of this Agreement and return it to the JPA to be appended to the official version of this Agreement. Recognizing the effort of the original Member Agencies to establish the JPA, the Board may require a financial contribution to become a member of the JPA.

15. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COSTS: COST ALLOCATION

15.1 Records and Accounts. The JPA shall cause to be kept accurate and correct books of account, showing capital costs (if any), and maintenance and operation costs of the JPA. The aforementioned described books and records shall be open to inspection at all times during normal business hours by Member Agencies. The Treasurer shall cause all financial records of the JPA to be audited by an independent public accountant or certified public accountant at least once a fiscal year and a copy of the audit to be delivered promptly to each Member Agency.

15.2 Allocation of Operating Expenses. Unless changed by mutual agreement of the Member Agencies, the operating costs and expenses in the budget shall be shared equally by the Member Agencies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any remaining operating costs and expenses Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 205 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -10- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc
associated with the operation and maintenance of the Off-Site GSI Projects and the administration of the CFD, which are not fully paid for by special taxes collected by the CFD, shall be apportioned to the Member Agencies based upon the maximum special taxes levied in each Member Agency’s jurisdiction.

16. WITHDRAWAL OF A MEMBER AGENCY FROM THE JOINT POWERS

AUTHORITY
A Member Agency may withdraw from this Agreement by filing written notice of intention to do so with the Manager and Chair no later than 5:00 p.m. of the December 31st immediately preceding the commencement of the following fiscal year (July 1 - June 30). The Member Agency’s withdrawal shall be effective at 11:59 p.m. on June 30th of the fiscal year in which the notice of intention was received. Withdrawal shall not relieve the Member Agency from any financial commitments associated with projects or programs that the withdrawing Member agreed to participate in prior to the effective date of the withdrawal. The withdrawal of any Member Agency shall not terminate this Agreement provided at least two (2) Member Agencies remain parties to the Agreement.

17. DISPOSITION OF ASSETS UPON WITHDRAWAL OF A MEMBER AGENCY No Member Agency, by withdrawing, shall, except as may be agreed to by the Board, be entitled to payment or return of funds paid or property donated, if any, by the withdrawing Member Agency to the JPA or to any distribution of its assets.

18. TERMINATION; DISSOLUTION AND DISPOSITION OF ASSETS
This Agreement may be terminated and the JPA dissolved upon the consent of all Member Agencies then party to the JPA. Upon termination of this Agreement and dissolution of the JPA, JPA funds shall first be used to pay expenses, debts, liabilities and obligations of the JPA; and any remaining JPA funds shall be distributed to the Member Agencies in proportion to contributions made by the Member Agencies. The Board shall reasonably value any remaining property in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

19. CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital assets of Member Agencies may be transferred to the JPA according to the disposition rules of the Member Agencies.

20. CONTRIBUTIONS AND ADVANCES
Pursuant to Government Code Section 6504, the Member Agencies may in their discretion make financial contributions, loans or advances to the JPA for the purposes of the JPA set forth in this Agreement. The repayment of such contribution, loans or advances will be on the written terms agreed to by the Member Agency making the contribution, loan or advance and the JPA.

21. LIMITATIONS ON POWERS
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 206 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -11- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc
As required by Government Code Section 6509, the power of the JPA is subject to the restrictions upon the manner of exercising power possessed by the City of San Pablo.

22. AMENDMENT
Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and approved by the governing bodies of all Member Agencies, provided, however, that no such amendment shall be entered into if the amendment would conflict with the provisions of any bonds (as defined in Government Code section 6585(c)), indenture, trust agreement, contract or other agreement securing or relating to any outstanding bonds of the JPA issued pursuant to state or federal laws.

23. NOTICE
Any notice required to be given or delivered by any provision of this Agreement shall be personally delivered or deposited in the U.S. Mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed to the Member Agencies at their addresses as reflected in the records of the JPA, and shall be deemed to have been received by the Member Agencies to which the same is addressed upon the earlier of receipt or seventy-two (72) hours after mailing.

24. SEVERABILITY
If a provision of the Agreement is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected.

25. SUCCESSORS
This Agreement shall be binding upon and accrue to the benefit of any successor of a Member Agency.

26. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION
No Member Agency may assign any rights or delegate any duties under this Agreement without the written consent of all other Member Agencies.

27. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in one (1) or more counterparts.

28. DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

The Member Agencies and the JPA shall make reasonable efforts to settle all disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement. Should any dispute among the Member Agencies arise out of this Agreement and should the Member Agencies be unable to resolve the dispute, the Member Agencies shall, at the written request of any Member Agency, meet in mediation and attempt in good faith to reach a resolution with the assistance of a mutually acceptable mediator.

In the event that mediation does not result in the settlement of a dispute within 120 days after the demand for mediation is made, any Member Agency and the JPA may pursue any remedies provided by law.

Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 207 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 -12- 13074-0002\3208885v3.doc

29. INTEGRATION
This Agreement represents the full and entire Agreement among the Members.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Joint Powers Agreement establishing the Joint Powers Authority set forth above. [PARTY]
By: _______________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: _______________________________
Date: _______________________________
Party: _____________________________
[PARTY]
By: _______________________________
Name: _______________________________
Title: _______________________________
Date: _______________________________
Party: _____________________________
Item 10.1
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 208 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 1, 2026
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.__-26 AUTHORIZING UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES AND DIRECTING STAFF TO IMPLEMENT A THREEYEAR PHASED INCREASE

SYNOPSIS
The Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a development impact fee authorized under the Traffic Mitigation Fee Act (AB 1600) to fund transportation improvements required to accommodate growth from new development. The City’s current TIF has not been updated since it was established in 2003. To ensure continued compliance with state law and that fees reflect current conditions, the City recently adopted a Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study and Fee Calculation Guidelines consistent with the 2040 General Plan.

The purpose of this item is to update the City’s TIF rate in accordance with the Nexus Study and Fee Calculation Guidelines.

The Budget Committee reviewed the recommended fee increase on November 5, 2025, and recommended the City Council approve the proposed resolution.

DISCUSSION
Background
The City established a TIF pursuant to the Traffic Mitigation Fee Act of 1989 (AB 1600), now codified in the Government Code at sections 66000-66025, governing development impact fees.

The TIF is intended to fund street and transportation improvement projects necessary to serve new development.

On May 18, 2026, the City Council adopted the Nexus Study and Fee Calculation Guidelines and introduced a new TIF ordinance.

On June 1, the City Council will adopt the new ordinance amending Chapter 5.55 of the Pleasant Hill Municipal Code (PHMC) to incorporate the Nexus Study and the Fee Calculation Guidelines.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 209 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 With the adoption of the new Nexus Study and the Fee Calculation Guidelines it is recommended that the City Council approve implementation of the fees identified in the Nexus Study and Fee Implementation Guidelines through a phased increase over a three-year period, as recommended by the Budget Committee at its November 5, 2025 meeting.

Analysis
The previous Traffic Impact Fee was based on a Nexus Study completed in 2003, which used a different methodology known as the “System Equity Approach.” Since then, the fees have been adjusted annually using the Engineering News-Record (ENR) 20-City Construction Cost Index.

The Traffic Impact Fee currently shown in the FY 2025/26 Master Fee Schedule is provided below.

Current Traffic Impact Fee
 Single-Family Residential: $3,879 per unit
 Multi-Family Residential: $3,110 per unit
 Commercial: $10.03 per square foot
 Office: $8.53 per square foot
 Industrial: $3.15 per square foot
 Other Uses: $325 per trip
Now that the ordinance has replaced the methodology for calculating the TIF, the fee listed above is no longer supported by current legal standards.

The current TIF program includes a list of capital improvement projects, reflecting the most recent projections of population and employment growth in the City, and changes the approach to one in which the fee is calculated based on the costs of a specific list of capital improvement projects.

The Nexus Study suggests the following fee be implemented:

Traffic Impact Fee Recommended by the TIF Nexus Study
 Single-Family Residential: $7,549 per unit
 Multi-Family Residential: $5,396 per unit
 Commercial: $18.05 per square foot
 Office: $12.37 per square foot
 Industrial: $5.62 per square foot
 Other Uses: $936 per trip
Following review of the Nexus Study, the Budget Committee recommended implementing the updated TIF through a phased approach, using an annual step increase over three years to reduce potential impacts on development.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 210 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 The Budget Committee also recommended that the TIF continue to be automatically adjusted with the Master Fee Schedule on an annual basis using the Engineering News Record (ENR) 20-City Construction Cost Index, with an annual adjustment cap of four percent (4%).

Initial Fee Recommended by the Budget Committee (Adopted with the new Master Fee Schedule on June 15 and Effective on September 1)
 Single-Family Residential: $5,102 per unit
 Multi-Family Residential: $3,872 per unit
 Commercial: $12.70 per square foot
 Office: $9.81 per square foot
 Industrial: $3.97 per square foot
 Other Uses: $529 per trip
Should the Council move forward with the approach recommended by the Budget Committee, the second step increase would be reflected within the new Master Fee Schedule, as adopted in June 2027, and would take effect September 1, 2027. The final rate increase recommended by the TIF Nexus Study would be implemented one year later, with adoption in June 2028 and effective date of September 1, 2028. Each step increase would also include the Construction Cost Index capped at 4%
Once the phasing is complete, the TIF will then continue to be adjusted annually based on the Construction Cost Index upon adoption each year of the Master Fee Schedule in June.

As part of the process to update the City of Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program, staff requested a summary of transportation impact fees collected by other jurisdictions in the general vicinity. The summary (See “Attachment D”) presents the data collected and compares it to the existing and potential future Pleasant Hill TIF amounts. Information on fees in other jurisdictions was gathered from the current fee schedules available on each jurisdiction’s website. The analysis found that the City of Pleasant Hill’s proposed TIF increase would more closely align the City with the majority of surrounding jurisdictions and areas, including Lamorinda, Martinez, and Pacheco.

FISCAL IMPACT
The implementation of the updated Traffic Impact Fee will generate sufficient revenue to fund the future Capital Improvement Projects listed in the Nexus Study.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Contact was made through posting of the City Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board, at the Pleasant Hill Senior Center, and at the Pleasant Hill Police Department. The agenda and staff report are posted on the City’s web page. The TIF Study and Fee Calculation Guidelines were posted on the City’s website on April 18th, 2026.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 211 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Move to adopt Resolution No. _26 Authorizing Updated Traffic Impact Fees and directing staff to Implement a Three-Year Phased Increase.

ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Council should provide further direction to staff if it elects not to implement the proposed three-year phased increase.

Should the Council not authorize the increased fee, the existing fee will not be charged due to the changed Nexus Study. In that case, the Council could elect to subsidize future projects using General Fund resources; otherwise, future Capital Improvement Projects may face insufficient funding.

ATTACHMENT(S)
Proposed Resolution - 2026 TIF Increase
Attachment A Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update, Prepared by Fehr and Peers, dated April 16, 2026
Attachment B Pleasant Hill TIF Fee Calculation Guidelines Attachment C Pleasant Hill TIF Comparison Memo, prepared by Fehr and Peers, dated August 25, 2025
Attachment D Proposed Master Fee Schedule (Redlined)
Attachment E Proposed Master Fee Schedule (Clean)
Prepared by: Laetitia Porta, Senior Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Ann James, Public Works Director
Reviewed by: Erick Cheung, Chief Financial Officer
Approved by: Ethan Bindernagel, City Manager
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 212 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 RESOLUTION NO. -26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANT HILL AUTHORIZING UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES AND IMPLEMENTING A THREEYEAR PHASED INCREASE WHEREAS, in 1989, the Traffic Impact Fee is authorized under the Traffic Mitigation Fee Act (Assembly Bill 1600) and is intended to fund street and transportation improvement projects necessary to accommodate growth resulting from new development; and WHEREAS, the City’s current citywide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program was established in 2003. The current program is based on a “system equity” approach, in which the TIF is based on a cost per trip using the citywide built infrastructure as the cost basis. As required by state law, City staff includes the TIF program in the City’s annual financial reports, and, per Municipal Code

5.55.050, the traffic mitigation fee is increased annually based on the construction cost index; and WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act requires that development impact fees be supported by a nexus analysis demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the impacts of new development, the need for public facilities, and the amount of the fee charged; and WHEREAS, the new Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study and Fee Calculation Guidelines recommends an increased fee, consistent with the new methodology, to ensure that new development contributes its fair share toward mitigating transportation impacts; and WHEREAS, the new fee calculation is based on the total costs eligible for inclusion in the TIF program ($33,960,300 total) divided by the projected amount of growth in Adjusted Daily Trips anticipated to occur between 2025 and 2035 (4,589); and, WHEREAS, on November 5, 2025, the Budget Committee recommended a phased approach with a gradual increase over three years and Construction Cost Index adjustments capped at four percent each year; and,
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2026, the City Council adopted a new Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study and Fee Calculation Guidelines; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to establish the charges proposed by the Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill that,
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the FY 26/27 Master Fee Schedule to update the Traffic Impact Fee to the following with an adoption date of June 15, 2026, and effective date of September 1, 2026:

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 213 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026  Single-Family Residential: $5,102 per unit
 Multi-Family Residential: $3,872 per unit
 Commercial: $12.70 per square foot
 Office: $9.81 per square foot
 Industrial: $3.97 per square foot
 Other Uses: $529 per trip
SECTION 2. The fee will be implemented using a phased approach of a three-step increase over the course of three years with approval of the Master Fee Schedule in June and will take effect on September 1 for FY 26/27. FY 27/28 and FY28/29.

SECTION 3. The fee will be automatically adjusted on an annual basis upon adoption of the Master Fee Schedule in June and will take effect on September 1st, using the Engineering News Record (ENR) 20-City Construction Cost Index, with an annual adjustment cap of four percent (4%).

ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill at a regular meeting held on the 1st day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
ZAC SHESS, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
LYONE P. CONNER, City Clerk
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 214 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic
Impact Fee Update
WC23-3963.01
Prepared for: Submitted on:

City of Pleasant Hill April 16, 2026
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 215 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 P
Table of Contents

1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Background and Purpose.................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Organization of the Report ...............................................................................................................................2

2. Project List................................................................................................................................. 3

3. Growth Projections ................................................................................................................... 8

3.1 Projections by Land Use Category.................................................................................................................8

3.2 Trip Generation by Land Use ..........................................................................................................................9

4. Nexus Allocation and Fee Calculations...................................................................................11

4.1 Allocation to Users..............................................................................................................................................11

4.2 Fee Calculations................................................................................................................................................12

5. Summary of Required Program Elements..............................................................................14 Fundamental Nexus Requirements .....................................................................................................................14 Additional Elements.................................................................................................................................................15 List of Figures
Figure 1: Pleasant Hill TIF Projects ..............................................................................................................................5 List of Tables
Table 1: Current Pleasant Hill TIF Fee Amounts........................................................................................................2 Table 2: Proposed Pleasant Hill TIF Projects ............................................................................................................6 Table 3: Citywide Growth Projection ..........................................................................................................................8 Table 4: Trip Demand Factors ......................................................................................................................................9 Table 5: Growth Converted to Dwelling Unit Equivalents................................................................................... 10 Table 6: Project Costs Eligible for TIF .......................................................................................................................12 Table 7: Calculation of Fee per Dwelling Unit Equivalent ....................................................................................13 Table 8: Fee per Land Use Category .........................................................................................................................13 Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 216 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 1
P

1. Introduction

1.1 Background and Purpose
Impact fees are established under the California Government Code sections 66000 through 66025, also sometimes known as Assembly Bill (AB) 1600 or the Mitigation Fee Act. Fees charged pursuant to this legislation are used to build capital facilities needed to offset the impacts generated by new development. It is common practice throughout California for local jurisdictions to establish impact fee programs to fund the construction of several types of public infrastructure and facilities; one common type of fee program is a traffic impact fee, which generates funds that are used to construct infrastructure and provide facilities that support the transportation needs of new residents and businesses.

Per the Government Code requirements , each impact fee program must be supported by a “nexus” analysis, a rational and documented set of procedures by which the agency establishes that there is a reasonable relationship (or “nexus”) between anticipated future development in the jurisdiction, the need for new infrastructure to support that development, and the fees that will be charged to help fund that infrastructure. Thus, the technical reports (such as this report) that are prepared to support a fee program are commonly called nexus studies.

The City of Pleasant Hill currently maintains a citywide Traffic Impact Fee (referred to in this report as the Pleasant Hill TIF or PHTIF) program, which was established in 2003 and has been continuously maintained as a mechanism for funding a portion of the costs of needed transportation improvements within the City. The current program is based on a “system equity” approach, in which the TIF is based on a cost per trip using the citywide built infrastructure as the cost basis. As required by state law, City staff includes the PHTIF program in the City’s annual financial reports, and, per Municipal Code 5.55.050, the traffic mitigation fee is increased annually based on the construction cost index. The most recent annual Master Fee Schedule became effective on September 1, 2024.

The current fee amounts are shown in Table 1.

The PHTIF program is now being updated to include a new list of capital improvement projects, reflect the most recent projections of population and employment growth in the City, and change the approach used to calculate fees from the existing “system equity” approach to one in which the fee is calculated based on the costs of a specific list of capital improvement projects. The fees will continue to be applied to new development that occurs anywhere in the City of Pleasant Hill. The purpose of this report is to serve as the necessary documentation to allow the City to adjust the PHTIF program.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 217 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 2
P
Table 1: Current Pleasant Hill TIF Fee Amounts
Fee Category Unit Current Traffic Impact Fee (as of
September 1, 2025)
Residential
Single Family Dwelling Unit $3,879
Multifamily Dwelling Unit $3,110
Nonresidential
Retail Thousand Square Feet (KSF) $10,030
Office KSF $8,527
Industrial KSF $3,145

1.2 Organization of the Report
After this introductory section, the report contains four additional sections:
• Section 2 – Project List, describes the list of capital improvement projects that would be included in the program.
• Section 3 – Growth Projections, documents the amount of growth anticipated over the next ten years in the City of Pleasant Hill.
• Section 4 – Nexus Analysis and Fee Calculations, describes the results of the nexus analysis and calculates the fee amounts using the information presented in the report. • Section 5 – Summary of Required Program Elements, summarizes how the information in this report satisfies the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000– 66025).

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 218 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 3
P

2. Project List
The City regularly updates its Capital Improvement Program (CIP): it is a key component of implementing the City’s General Plan as it pertains to maintaining operational standards for the City’s transportation system. The most recent CIP was adopted in July 2024. For the purposes of this PHTIF update, City staff undertook a thorough review of transportation improvement projects identified in the CIP, as well as those in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) adopted in March 2024 and developed a list of 15 projects for inclusion in the updated PHTIF. The PHTIF area and the set of projects proposed for inclusion in the fee program is shown on Figure 1. Cost estimates for all projects have been drawn from the most recent CIP and BPMP, supplemented with cost information supplied by City staff. The updated project list, including the cost estimates, is shown in Table 2.

As noted in the 2003 Traffic Mitigation Fee Update Report, given that the City of Pleasant Hill is close to being built out, large capacity-increasing projects are no longer a practicable method for accommodating growth in the City. For this reason, the City’s latest General Plan update (2023) specifies certain policies that directly address the City’s role in building infrastructure projects such as roadway improvements, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities in its Circulation Element chapter.1 The General Plan policies that support the need to provide fee funding for the projects in the project list are listed below:

TC-3.2 Arterial and Collector Streets: Minimize opportunities for regionally generated cut-through vehicle travel in the City as part of new roadway projects or projects within public roadways.

TC-3.3 Vehicle Traffic Calming Devices: Consider traffic calming devices such as lane narrowing, widening medians, neighborhood traffic circles, roundabouts, and landscaping to discourage cut-through vehicle traffic.

TC-3.4 Alternative Methods to Prevent Cut-Through Vehicle Traffic: Consider the use of alternative street surfacing materials, traffic diverters, special designs, and stop signs to prevent cut-through traffic on residential streets.

TC-5.3 Mobility Technology Support: Identify and implement technology that supports walking, biking, commuting, and other alternative transportation modes within the City including infrastructure that supports micro-mobility use within the City.

TC-8.5 Reduce Vehicle Speeds: Support the reduction of vehicle speeds using engineering and design techniques, community education, and evaluation and planning strategies rather than relying solely on enforcement.

TC-8.6 Wide Sidewalks for Shared Use: Provide wide sidewalks to allow shared use by pedestrians, bicyclists, and non-motorized modes of transportation as directed by the City Engineer.
1 City of Pleasant Hill 2040 General Plan Transportation and Circulation Element, 2023, https://pleasanthill2040.com/images/docs/PHGPU_05_PRD_Circulation_2022%2010%2026%20BG.pdf Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 219 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 4
P
TC-8.8 New Development Neighborhood Traffic Impacts: Require developer participation in the cost of installation of traffic calming measures to reduce neighborhood traffic impacts through fee payments or direct contribution as a condition of approval, if applicable.

TC-8.10 Visually Appealing Medians and Street Edges: Provide enhanced landscape medians and street edges that are visually appealing and provide shade and buffers for pedestrians and cyclists.

TC-9.3 Enhance Pedestrian Crossing: Enhance pedestrian crossings on all arterial and collector roadways.

TC-9.4 Sidewalk Maintenance: Maintain existing sidewalk to meet ADA requirements, including removal or relocation of objects obstructing pedestrian path and installation of wider or detached sidewalks with a buffer separation from vehicular traffic, where feasible.

TC-11.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Network: Support a network of safe and comfortable bikeway and pedestrian facilities connecting neighborhoods and destinations in Pleasant Hill and adjacent jurisdictions.

TC-11.2 Street Design: Require street cross-sections to accommodate bicyclists, micromobility users, and pedestrians.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 220 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Walnut Creek
Pine Creek
Walnut Creek
Buchanan Field
Airport
Paso Nogal
Park
Willow Pass Rd
Sunvalley Blvd
Diamond Blvd
Concord Ave
Clayton Rd
Market St
Meadow Ln
Monument Blvd
Mohr Ln
Bancroft Rd
Geary Rd Treat Blvd Putnam Blvd
Pleasant Hill Rd
Buskirk Ave
Oak Rd Contra Costa Blvd
Taylor Blvd
Reliez Valley Rd
Patterson Blvd
Oak Park Blvd
Boyd Rd
Withers Ave
Grayson Rd Gregory Ln
Alhambra Ave
Paso Nogal Rd
Paso Nogal Rd
Golf Club Dr
Viking Dr
Taylor Blvd
Morello Ave
Chilpancingo Pkwy
Center Ave Pachecho Blvd
Blue Ridge Dr
Coggins Dr

PLEASANT
HILL

HOOKSTON

BANCROFT
WALDON
242
680
680
3 2
1 6
4 7
5 Traffic Signal Installation at
Pleasant Hill Road & Boyd Road
Pleasant Hill Road (Phases II-V)
City of Pleasant Hill
Project Extent Projects #8–15 are either citywide projects or in multiple locations, and are not displayed on the map.
# *
City of Pleasant Hill TIF Projects
FIGURE 1
Project List

1. Pleasant Hill Road Improvements (Phase II - V)

2. Paso Nogal Road (North) (Alhambra Avenue to Morello Avenue)

3. Re-landscape Medians Along Taylor Boulevard

4. Gregory Lane Complete Streets Improvement Study

5. Coggins Drive Complete Street Improvement Project

6. Boyd Road/Pleasant Hill Road Signal Installation Project

7. Monument Blvd/I-680 Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Project

8. Citywide Traffic Signal System Upgrade*

9. Citywide Traffic Signal Communications Network*

10. BPMP Improvements*

11. SR2S Planning*

12. SR2S Infrastructure*

13. Traffic Signal Adaptive*

14. ADA Improvement Program*

15. Sidewalk Gap Closure*
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 221 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 6
P
Table 2: Proposed Pleasant Hill TIF Projects
Number Project Name Description
Total
Estimated
Cost (2025 $)
1 Pleasant Hill Road
Improvements (Phase

II - V)
Street improvements focused on roadway
operations enhancements and complete streets
treatments. New traffic signal at Pleasant Hill
Rd & Boyd Rd planned as part of project.
$8,024,000
2 Paso Nogal Road
(North) Multimodal
Improvements
Roadway safety features including shoulder
improvements, guardrail replacements, and
bike network improvements from Alhambra
Avenue to Morello Avenue
$1,012,000
3 Re-landscape
Medians Along Taylor
Boulevard
Replacement of deteriorated landscape
medians on Taylor Road, median island
improvements, gateway treatments, and traffic
calming.
$675,000
4 Gregory Lane
Complete Streets
Improvement Study
New bicycle-pedestrian streetscape design
between Pleasant Hill Road and Contra Costa
Boulevard. Treatments include new roadway
configuration, landscaped medians, street
lighting, and bike-ped treatments.
$10,094,000
5 Coggins Drive
Complete Street
Improvement Project
Traffic calming treatments to support bike-ped
connections to Iron Horse Trail and BART. $2,500,000
6 Boyd Road/Pleasant
Hill Road Signal
Installation Project
New traffic signal at the intersection of
Pleasant Hill Road & Boyd Road. $689,000
7 Monument Blvd/I-680
Bicycle & Pedestrian
Improvement Project
New Bike-Ped Improvements along Monument
Boulevard to connect Downtown Pleasant Hill
to City of Concord. Project proposes removal
of SB I-680 on-ramp.
$10,000,000
8 Citywide Traffic Signal
System Upgrade1
Improvements, upgrades and replacements of
existing traffic signals, as well as the installation
of new traffic signals.
$6,938,990
9 Citywide Traffic Signal
Communications
Network1
This project will link all the city's traffic signals,
enabling central monitoring, remote control,
and real-time data exchange to optimize traffic
flow and improve safety through technologies
like fiber optics, adaptive signal control, and
transit signal priority. This infrastructure is a
critical component of a city's Intelligent
Transportation System (ITS) and supports
broader "Smart City" goals.
$11,008,000
Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 222 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 7
P
Number Project Name Description
Total
Estimated
Cost (2025 $)
10 BPMP Improvements1
Citywide projects focused on the
implementation of recommendations from the
Pleasant Hill - Bicycle Pedestrian
Transportation Plan.
$45,294,000
11 SR2S Planning1
Programmatic based Safe Routes to School
improvements to support collaboration
between the City, School District, and Private
Schools. Program elements include
development of Suggested Route to School
Maps and Route Improvement Maps.
$275,000
12 SR2S Infrastructure1
Safe Routes to School infrastructure that
addresses and enhances pedestrian and bicycle
safety. Prioritize infrastructure improvements
along routes supporting student commutes.
$1,046,000
13 Traffic Signal
Adaptive1
This program helps fund adaptive traffic signal
projects in the City. $138,000
14 ADA Improvement
Program1
This program provides for the construction of
ADA compliant curb ramps throughout the City.

This program may also fund ADA ramp retrofit
and traffic signal upgrades at signalized
intersections to meet current ADA design
standards at signalized intersections.
$5,102,020
15 Sidewalk Gap Closure1 This program helps fund gap closure projects in the City. $239,476
TOTAL $103,035,486
Notes:
1: Citywide or multi-location projects.

Source: City of Pleasant Hill, 2025.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 223 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 8
P

3. Growth Projections

3.1 Projections by Land Use Category
An important element of every fee calculation is the estimate of future growth in the fee area. As part of this update, the current land use files available from the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) travel demand model, the City of Pleasant Hill’s 2023-2031 Housing Element, and Plan Bay Area 2050 were reviewed. The files from the CCTA model contain projections of the amount of residential and employment growth anticipated to occur in Pleasant Hill. CCTA has completed an update of the travel model and has developed a new set of land use files that reflect the totals from the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Projections 2017 publication. The Housing Element establishes a comprehensive plan to address housing needs in Pleasant Hill over an eight-year planning period and provides a breakdown of allocation by single family and multifamily dwelling units. The most recent Housing Element update was in November 2022. The most recent Plan Bay Area 2050 was developed in October 2021 and contains projections for total households and jobs in the Bay Area by county and by “superdistrict.” Pleasant Hill resides in Superdistrict 21, North Contra Costa County.

The first step in the process was to identify which of the model’s traffic analysis zones (TAZs) are within the City of Pleasant Hill’s jurisdiction. The City’s jurisdictional boundary was available as a GIS file and was overlaid with the CCTA TAZ structure to identify TAZs located within the City’s jurisdiction.

The next step was to tabulate the total number of households and employment in Pleasant Hill from each source mentioned above. After discussions with City staff, the CCTA model will be used for the baseline year 2025. However, the Housing Element and Plan Bay Area 2050 were used for the residential and employment growth projections, respectively, for the horizon year 2035. For summary purposes, the total growth projected in the City of Pleasant Hill is shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Citywide Growth Projection
Category 2025 Base Year 2035 Projection 2025-2035 Growth Population 38,402 45,040 17%
Single Family Dwelling
Units 10,782 11,406 6%
Multifamily Dwelling
Units 4,805 6,836 42%
Retail Employment 4,564 5,243 15%
Non-Retail Employment 19,237 22,099 15%
Source: CCTA, Pleasant Hill Housing Element, Plan Bay Area 2050; Fehr & Peers, 2025.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 224 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 9
P

3.2 Trip Generation by Land Use
This study establishes a common basis for assessing fees across different land use categories by calculating a Dwelling Unit Equivalent, reflecting characteristics of each land use that affect its contribution of new vehicle trips on the roadway system in Pleasant Hill. The characteristics of each land use category used in this calculation include the trip generation rate, the proportion of new and pass-by trips, and trip lengths.

For the purposes of this study, daily trip generation rates have been drawn from the recently released 11th edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The percentages of new and pass-by trips are drawn from the SANDAG Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates, dated April 2002. Trip lengths reference the 2012 California Household Travel Survey data, which presents observed trip lengths for each city and county in the state. The variables used in the calculations are shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Trip Demand Factors
Fee Category Unit ITE Code Daily Trip
Rate1
New Trip
Percentage 2
Average
Trip
Length3
Dwelling
Unit
Equivalent
Factor4
Residential
Single Family Unit 210 9.4 97% 6.9 1.00
Multifamily Unit 220 6.7 97% 6.9 0.71
Nonresidential
Retail KSF 820 37.0 78% 5.2 2.39
Office KSF 710 10.8 96% 9.9 1.64
Industrial KSF 110 4.9 97% 9.9 0.74

1. Reflects average number of daily trips for the unit type indicated based on data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition).

2. This factor accounts for the fact that some trips generated by the land uses will be pass-by or otherwise pre-existing trips. The source is a Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates, SANDAG, April 2002.

3. Average trip length in miles based on the California Household Travel Survey 2012, for the City of Pleasant Hill. Residential land use category uses total average of all trips, Retail uses “Home-Based Other” average, and the Office and Other non-residential categories are based on “Home-Based Work” trip lengths.

4. The calculation of the Dwelling Unit Equivalent Factor is the daily trip rate multiplied by the new trip percentage, then multiplied by the average trip length and divided by the county-wide average trip length of

7.80 miles. These values were normalized for each category such that the single-family residential category is assigned a Dwelling Unit Equivalent Factor of 1.00.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.

The Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE) Factors are then used to calculate the total growth in Dwelling Unit Equivalents (DUEs). Table 5 displays how that growth was multiplied by the DUE factors to derive total growth expressed in units of DUEs. Overall, these calculations result in an estimated 15% increase in DUEs citywide between 2025 and 2035.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 225 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 10
P
Table 5: Growth Converted to Dwelling Unit Equivalents
Land Use Type
# of Dwelling
Units or # of
Employees
KSF (for nonresidential
categories)
Dwelling Unit
Equivalent
Factor
Dwelling Unit
Equivalents
(DUEs)
Existing (2025)
Single Family 10,782 1.0 10,782
Multifamily 4,805 0.7 3,434
Retail Employment 4,564 2,282 2.4 5,455
Non-Retail Employment 19,237 6,978 1.6 11,438
Total 31,109
Future (2035)
Single Family 11,406 1.0 11,406
Multifamily 6,836 0.7 4,886
Retail Employment 5,243 2,621 2.4 6,266
Non-Retail Employment 22,099 8,016 1.6 13,140
Total 35,698
Growth (2025–2035)
Single Family 624 1.0 624
Multifamily 2,031 0.7 1,452
Retail Employment 679 339 2.4 811
Non-Retail Employment 2,862 1,038 1.6 1,702
Total 4,589
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 226 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 11
P

4. Nexus Allocation and Fee Calculations
The nexus analysis process involves determining the relationship between new development in the area subject to the fee and cost of the improvements to be constructed. This process determines what proportion of the cost of each project would be funded by the fee program. The final result is a set of calculations for the maximum level of fee that could be applied to new development in the City of Pleasant Hill.

4.1 Allocation to Users
The purpose of a TIF program is to provide funding for improvements to the extent necessitated by future development. To provide a quantitative estimate of future usage, the proportion of project costs attributable to new local development was evaluated using the CCTA countywide travel model and citywide growth projections.

The travel model currently available to conduct this analysis is the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Model (CCTA). Using the CCTA model, a “baseline” year (2025) scenario was run. For each link associated with a TIF project, the traffic volume was captured. Since the TIF is a local fee program, it is also important to identify the proportion of traffic on each facility that is local in nature.

Local trips are trips that start and/or end in the City (i.e., trips that travel within the City, or that have one end inside the City and one end outside the City). Pass-through or non-local trips are excluded from TIF calculations. A run of a “future” year (2035) was not scoped in this work, given that it would have required a detailed assignment of the projected growth into the Pleasant Hill TAZs in the model.

Thus, the baseline year scenario was used to estimate the percentage of new trips projected to use each facility that are local. Given the limitations of this scope, instead of using percentage of new local traffic on each facility, a weighted average of local trips across facilities for all projects was calculated and used for all projects that have a specific and identifiable location (projects #1-7).

It should be noted that some projects on the TIF list are not specific to an individual location but are citywide in nature. This includes project numbers 8 through 15. These types of projects cannot be reflected in the CCTA model, so the modeling procedure described above is not applicable to them.

Instead, because of the citywide nature of these projects, the proportion of project cost considered eligible for inclusion in the PHTIF program has been set to be the same as the projected growth in residents as displayed in Table 3 above.

The results are shown in Table 6. The table lists each of the TIF projects and shows the “nexus” percentage used as the percentage of that facility’s improvement cost that will be considered eligible for inclusion in the TIF program.

The intent of this analysis is solely for the purposes of the TIF process. The primary result is the percentage of new local trips projected to use each facility. It is not intended for these results to be used to determine the appropriate size or configuration for any particular facility, or to directly support any project-specific planning activities.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 227 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 12
P
Table 6: Project Costs Eligible for TIF
No. Project Total Cost
Estimate (2025 $)
% of Cost
Eligible for
PHTIF
Cost Eligible for
PHTIF
1 Pleasant Hill Road Improvements
(Phase II - V) $8,024,000
66%
$5,302,600
2 Paso Nogal Road (North)
Multimodal Improvements $1,012,000 $668,800
3 Re-landscape Medians Along
Taylor Boulevard $675,000 $446,100
4 Gregory Lane Complete Streets
Improvement Study $10,094,000 $6,670,500
5 Coggins Drive Complete Street
Improvement Project $2,500,000 $1,652,100
6 Boyd Road/Pleasant Hill Road
Signal Installation Project $689,000 $455,300
7 Monument Blvd/I-680 Bicycle &
Pedestrian Improvement Project $10,000,000 $6,608,400
8 Citywide Traffic Signal System
Upgrade $6,938,990
17%
$1,204,300
9 Citywide Traffic Signal
Communications Network $11,008,000 $1,910,600
10 BPMP Improvements $45,294,000 $7,861,300
11 SR2S Planning $275,000 $47,700
12 SR2S Infrastructure $1,046,000 $181,500
13 Traffic Signal Adaptive $138,000 $24,000
14 ADA Improvement Program $5,102,020 $885,500
15 Sidewalk Gap Closure $239,476 $41,600
Total $103,035,486 33% $33,960,300
Sources: City of Pleasant Hill, 2025; Contra Costa County, Contra Costa Transportation Authority, CCTA Model; Fehr & Peers, 2025.

4.2 Fee Calculations
The fee calculation is based on the total costs eligible for inclusion in the TIF program divided by the projected amount of new DUEs anticipated to occur between 2025 and 2035. Table 7 presents these calculations, resulting in a fee calculation of $7,401 per DUE. Table 8 applies this value across all the land use categories.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 228 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 13
P
Table 7: Calculation of Fee per Dwelling Unit Equivalent Calculation Value
Cost Eligible for TIF $33,960,300
Growth in DUEs 4,589
Fee per DUE $7,401
Fee per Daily Trip $917
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.

Table 8: Fee per Land Use Category
Land Use
Category Unit Fee per DUE DUE Factor Raw Fee per Unit
Administrative
Charge (2%)
Total Fee
per Unit
Residential
Single Family DU $7,401 1.00 $7,401 $148 $7,549
Multifamily DU $7,401 0.71 $5,290 $106 $5,396
Non-Residential
Retail KSF $7,401 2.39 $17,693 $354 $18,047
Office KSF $7,401 1.64 $12,132 $243 $12,374
Industrial KSF $7,401 0.74 $5,507 $110 $5,617
Other Daily
Trip - - $917 $18 $936
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.

It should be emphasized that the values presented in this nexus report are the maximum fee levels that could be set based on the data and assumptions presented here. The City Council may elect to set fee amounts that are lower than the maximum levels.

The City has prepared fee calculation guidelines to accompany this nexus report and provide additional specificity on how the PHTIF program will be applied to individual development applications. The guidelines support consistent implementation by identifying the applicable land use categories and setting procedures for calculating the fee for new construction, intensification of use, and land uses that do not fit within the City’s standard fee categories.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 229 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 14
P

5. Summary of Required
Program Elements
This report has provided a detailed discussion of the elements of the Pleasant Hill Transportation Impact Fee program and explained the analytical techniques used to develop this nexus study. The report addresses all fee program elements required by Government Code 66000–66025, as summarized below.

Fundamental Nexus Requirements

1. Identifying the purpose of the fee
The Pleasant Hill TIF program was established for the purpose of supporting public infrastructure improvements and facilities needed to mitigate the traffic-related impacts of new development in Pleasant Hill.

2. Identifying how the fee will be used and the facilities to be funded through the fee The fee is used to help fund capital improvement projects that will accommodate future transportation needs throughout the City. Table 2 identifies the projects to be funded through the fee.

3. Determining a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development on which the fee is imposed
As described in this report, different types of development generate traffic with different characteristics. The calculations presented in Table 4 and Table 5 account for these characteristics by calculating the travel-related characteristics of different land use types. These considerations account for the differential impacts on the local transportation system generated by different development types.

4. Determining a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development on which the fee is imposed
The need for the facilities listed in Table 2 has been established through local planning processes prepared by the City of Pleasant Hill.

5. Determining a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility (or portion of facility) attributable to new development Section 4 of this report describes the calculations applied to determine the cost of the public facilities that is attributable to new development in the TIF area. A reasonable effort has been made to quantitatively establish the relationship between the fees charged in the Pleasant Hill TIF program and the costs of public improvements attributable to new development within Pleasant Hill.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 230 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 15
P
Additional Elements
Due to recent changes in state legislation, Section 66016.5 now defines several additional elements beyond the fundamental nexus requirements that have historically been part of the Mitigation Fee Act. These additional elements include the following:
• If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee.

The Pleasant Hill TIF program was established in 2003 using a “system equity” approach, in which fees were calculated as a cost per trip based on the value of the City’s existing transportation system and adjusted annually to reflect changes in construction costs. Since its adoption, the City has prepared annual reports documenting fee activity, and the Traffic Mitigation Fund has been included in the City’s audited financial statements. These reports show that revenues have been collected and used to support transportation improvements, with amounts varying in line with development activity.

This update shifts the program from the system equity method to a project-based calculation using the costs of a defined list of transportation projects in the City’s 2024–2029 Capital Improvement Plan. Because this methodology directly reflects identified project costs needed to accommodate growth, the updated fee levels are higher than under the prior approach and align the program with the cost of planned improvements. • Calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development, or explain why that would not be an appropriate metric for calculating fees.

The Pleasant Hill TIF fees on housing developments have always been calculated based on the type of unit, with one fee level for single-family units and a different (lower) fee level for multi-family units. This has been a common practice for most fee programs around the state for many years.

In the case of the Pleasant Hill TIF Program, this practice aligns with the data that is readily available about the transportation impacts of housing developments; industry-standard reference documents about the trip generation rates, trip lengths, and pass-by/diverted trip characteristics of new development projects present that data either for all types of housing units combined or for a few different types of housing units, and do not typically present that data based on the unit size. Examples of data sources routinely used to support fee calculations include the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, the SANDAG Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates, and the California Household Travel Survey.

The Mitigation Fee Act requires that there be a demonstrated relationship between the fee being charged to a new development and the level of demand that development places on public facilities and services. As described previously, the calculations presented in Table 4 and Table 5 account for these characteristics by calculating the travel-related characteristics of different land use types. These considerations account for the differential impacts on the transportation system generated by different development types. There is no available reference document that directly links trip generation rates to the square footage of a Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 231 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Update | 16
P
housing unit. Given the lack of readily available reference data about how the size of a housing unit might be related to the demand that unit would place on the transportation system, some agencies in California have undertaken statistical analyses to attempt to better understand that relationship.

Several of these recent statistical analyses have found limited information available from which to derive conclusions. The analyses cite some sources of information that link trip generation rates to the number of people living in a housing unit, although those sources often present values that are averaged over large geographic areas and the results can differ substantially; for example, some analyses cite the 2017 National Household Travel Survey which indicates that a 4-person household in California generates 12.6 daily trips, while others cite a 2012 national report on Travel Demand Forecasting: Parameters and Techniques that indicates a 4-person household generates 16.1 daily trips. These analyses then estimate the relationship between the number of people living in a house and the square footage of the house using US Census data, and then combine those factors to estimate trip generation rates by house size.

An alternative approach has been taken in Western Riverside County, where an analysis was done based on actual trip generation rates and house size data collected from residential neighborhoods throughout that region. This locally-specific analysis found that single-family house size explained approximately one-half of the variation in trip generation rates, while the other half of the variation was related to other economic and demographic factors such as household income, number of residents with jobs, number of school-age children in the household, number of vehicles owned by the residents, and other factors. In addition, the relationship between single-family house size and trip generation rates was found to hold only for houses up to 2,500 square feet; for larger houses, the statistical relationship was much less strong. No statistically significant relationship was found for multi-family developments.

In considering how the above factors might apply in Pleasant Hill, City staff have pointed out that single-family home sizes in Pleasant Hill tend to fall within a relatively narrow range (i.e., there is not wide variation in house sizes). In addition, the City is largely built out, with most new residential development consisting of lot splits and small-scale modifications in existing neighborhoods; new subdivisions containing many new homes are uncommon.

In light of the lack of consistent and available sources of data to support conclusions about how housing units of varying sizes affect the transportation system, and in light of the characteristics of new housing development in Pleasant Hill, the City has concluded that square footage is not currently an appropriate metric to use in calculating fees on residential developments, nor is there substantial evidence that the current method of calculating fees is disproportionate to a residential development’s effects on the transportation system. • In large jurisdictions, adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study.

For this purpose, a large jurisdiction is defined as a county with a population of at least 250,000 and all the cities within that county, so the City of Pleasant Hill would meet the definition of a large jurisdiction. The City of Pleasant Hill maintains a Capital Improvement Plan, which was most recently updated for the 2024-2029 period, and this plan was used to identify projects for updating the City’s TIF program. The CIP provides the foundation for identifying eligible projects, ensuring that the fee program aligns with both local priorities and the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 232 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026

City of Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Calculation Guidelines The purpose of these Fee Calculation Guidelines is to assist the City of Pleasant Hill and its staff with implementation of the Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee (PHTIF) program. These Guidelines provide additional details not included in the PHTIF Nexus Update report.

Development Projects
The City of Pleasant Hill applies the PHTIF to building permits associated with all Development Projects as defined in this section.

1. New Construction
Refers to construction of new building space for either residential or non-residential use(s), including the addition of building space to existing developed property.

2. Intensification of Use
Refers to a change in use of all or part of an existing building, whether vacant or not, if that change in use requires a building permit from the City and if the new proposed use would result in a higher fee than the current use based on the current PHTIF fee schedule.

In the case of the re-use of a vacant building, the building’s “current use” is considered to be the use when the building was occupied, if the vacancy occurred within the three years prior to the date of the building permit application. If the building became vacant more than three years prior to the date of the building permit application, then the fee would be applied as if the project was New Construction. The building permit applicant bears the burden of demonstrating that the building was in use within this time period through submittal of documents acceptable to the City such as executed lease agreements or lease payment records.

Land Use Categories
The City, as part of their typical process of reviewing a proposed Development Project, will determine the land use categories that are applicable and will calculate the fee. As they make those determinations, the City will consider the following:

1. Residential Land Uses
a. Single Family Residential: Dwelling units that are one single family detached unit on a parcel.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 233 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Calculation Guidelines | 2 b. Multi-Family Residential: Dwelling units that are apartments, condominiums, townhomes, multiplexes, mobile homes in mobile home parks. c. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): Please see the City’s TIF ordinance for guidance on application of impact fees to ADUs. In general, traffic fees on ADUs are related to the square footage of the ADU and the square footage of the existing primary dwelling unit.

2. Non-residential Land Uses
a. Retail: Retail uses, including personal service businesses and restaurants. b. Office: Office facilities.
c. Industrial: Light or heavy industrial uses, including manufacturing, processing, fabrication, research and development, or distribution functions.

3. Other Land Uses
a. Other: The Other land use category is intended for Development Projects with land uses that do not fit within the standard categories defined above. It is anticipated that most Development Projects will fit within the standard categories, but some Projects will contain land uses with trip generation characteristics that are substantially different from those represented in the standard categories.

Examples of such land uses could include gas stations, drive-through facilities, and theaters or other entertainment venues, among others. The City will determine whether a particular Development Project involves land uses that should be treated within the Other category; early consultation with City staff is highly recommended. Application of the Other category will require the estimation of the number of daily peak hour trips that will be generated by the proposed land use.

Fee Calculation

1. New Construction
PHTIF
Fee =
PHTIF Fee per Dwelling Unit or
per Thousand Square Feet
Based on Applicable Land Use
Category
X
New Dwelling Units or
New Thousand Square
Feet
For Development Projects with multiple land use categories, the PHTIF Fee equals the sum of PHTIF Fees applied to each land use category separately.

2. Intensification of Use
First calculate the PHTIF Fee for the proposed new use, using the formula provided in the section above on New Construction. Then calculate what the PHTIF Fee would be for the current use (that is, the existing square footage multiplied by the PHTIF Fee per Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 234 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 City of Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee Calculation Guidelines | 3 square foot for the existing permitted land use category). Subtract the existing permitted use fee from the proposed new use fee. If the difference is greater than zero, that difference represents the PHTIF Fee due as a result of the intensification of use. If the difference is less than zero, then no PHTIF Fee is due, nor will there be any PHTIF Fee refund or credit.

3. Other Land Use Category
PHTIF
Fee = PHTIF Fee per Daily Trip X
Number of New Daily
Trips Estimated for
Proposed Use
As described above, the City will determine when the Other land use category applies as part of its standard review of a proposed Development Project. For projects that are already subject to a transportation impact analysis under the City’s existing requirements, the trip generation estimates prepared for that analysis may also be used to support application of the fee under the Other land use category. For other projects, the applicant may submit a trip generation estimate as part of the development application for the City’s review and determination. Trip generation estimates would typically be based on the most current edition of Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and may also incorporate trip generation surveys from comparable sites with similar characteristics, consistent with the ITE manual and the City’s applicable technical procedures.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 235 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026 Memo
Date: August 25, 2025
To: Laetitia Galeazzi and Ann James, City of Pleasant Hill From: Julie Morgan and Bruno Lertora, Fehr & Peers
Subject: Summary of Traffic Impact Fees in Neighboring Jurisdictions As part of the process to update the City of Pleasant Hill Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program, staff requested a summary of transportation impact fees collected by other jurisdictions in the general vicinity. The following table presents the data collected and compares it to the existing and potential future Pleasant Hill TIF amounts. Information on fees in other jurisdictions was gathered from the current fee schedules available on each jurisdiction’s website. Jurisdictions impose development impact fees for a wide range of purposes; the fees shown here are those charged specifically for transportation purposes.

Table 1. Traffic Impact Fees in Pleasant Hill and Nearby Jurisdictions Municipality Single-Family
(per Unit)
Multifamily (Per
Unit) Retail (Per KSF1
) Office (Per KSF1)
Pleasant Hill
(Current) $3,879 $3,110 $10,030 $8,527
Pleasant Hill
(Potential Future) $7,405 $5,293 $17,703 $12,139
Concord $3,251 $2,624 $8,810 $7,040
Lamorinda2 $10,015 $7,010 $10,700 $10,700
Martinez $8,356 $6,711 $20,970 $13,390
Pacheco $7,342 $4,479 $10,430 $8,450
Note: The City of Walnut Creek imposes a traffic impact fee for each vehicle trip estimated to be generated by the development during the afternoon peak commute hours. Their fee is $5,267 per PM peak hour trip. 1: KSF = 1,000 Square Feet.
2: The three cities in the Lamorinda area do not have individual city traffic fee programs, and instead rely on the Lamorinda program for their fees.

Item 10.2
City Council Meeting Agenda - Page 236 of 331 - Monday, June 01, 2026