Pleasanton City Council
May 19, 2026

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

-˂Ʉ
ɩ̛ͩ 8͍ˏΘ
ʍ
öˏ̆˵ˏɲ̛8͍ˏΘʍĊ̛ͩ̌ʍ͍ˏɾʳʍ·Ʉ˵˵
þ
̛
Ʉɾ Ċͩ ̛̌ʍ͍ˏɾʳʍ 8͍ˏΘʍ
zɄɲˏʍ̌ɾ
Ʉ
8͍ˏΘʍ
ŅɄ˵˵ʍΩࢫ
Θʍ̌ͷʍ
-Ʉ͛ʍ
Θʍ ̌
ͷʍ
ŋˏ˵˵̛Νࢫþ̛Ʉɾ
kˏ͍͛ͩࢫĊ͍ͩʍʍͩ
nˏɩ͍ Ʉ˵ͩɄ͍
8 ͍
ˏΘʍ
ĊɄ̌
ͩɄþˏͩɄ þ̛
Ʉɾ
·Ʉˏ̌
Ċ͍ͩʍʍͩ
Ċͷ̛̌˵ % ̛ͷ
˵ʍΘɄ
͍ɾ
˵- ˵ Ÿ̛ ʍ ̌
ͩ ʍ͍
ö Ʉ ͍ ˬΝɄΩ
ÌΝʍ̌͛ 8͍ˏΘʍ
%ʍ͍̌Ʉ˵
Θʍ̌ ͷʍ
k̛
̛ͩ˂ˏ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ
%ͷ͛ɲ˂ࢫþ̛Ʉɾ
›̛
˂
̛̌͛̌
8͍ˏ Θ ʍ
Ņˏ̌ʍΩɄ͍ɾ
Θʍ̌ͷʍ
k̛̛ͩ˂ˏ ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ


ʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩ
ͅɄˏ̌
ͩˏʍ͛
͍Ʉˏ˵
͛ʍ ·ˏ˵࠸ࢶ࠳ ࠴࠳
-̛˵˵ˏ͛ˏ̛̌͛ࢫɩΩࢫĊʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩ
kɄͩɄ˵ĊʍΘʍ͍ʍࢫ†̌˥ͷ͍ΩŅˏ͛ˏɩ˵ʍࢫ†̌˥ͷ͍Ω-̛̆ͅ˵Ʉˏ̌ͩࢫ̛ʱࢫͅɄˏ̌
³ƺɮƺȸƺ ǣȇǴɖȸɵ
ۏג׏ ً׎א
!ȒȅȵǼƏǣȇɎ Ȓǔ ȵƏǣȇ
ۏאב ًגא
àǣɀǣƫǼƺ ǣȇǴɖȸɵ
ۏ׏ה ً׎ח
IƏɎƏǼ
ۏ׏ ًו
הג׏
XȇǴɖȸɵ
!ȒǼǼǣɀǣȒȇ
àǣɀ
׎ח
IƏɎƏǼ
ۏ׏ ًו
הג׏
XȇǴɖȸɵ
!ȒǼǼǣɀǣȒȇ
!
nnX³X
z ç ³0à0«XÁç
Mode KSI InjuryBicycle 15 117Electric Bicycle 19Electric Motorized Board 02Electric Scooter 5 18Violation CategoryUnsafe Speed 6 31Improper Turning 4 23Automobile Right of way 3 38ė͍ɄʱёɲࢫĊˏʳ̌Ʉ˵͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫĊˏʳ̌͛ࢫŅˏ̛˵Ʉͩˏ̛̌ 2 17Collision TypeBroadside 8 80Others 5 19Hit Object 3 16Rear End 38LocationIntersection 13 117Roadway Corridor 8 29

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

ͷ̛ͩ̆Ʉͩʍɾࢫ ͍ʍɾ࣒ˏ˵ʳ˂ͩࢫ ʍ̌ʱ̛͍ɲʍ̆ʍ̌ͩࢫ˂ Ʉ͛ࢫ ɩʍʍ̌ࢫˏ ɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫ Ʉ͛ࢫ Ʉࢫ̛ͩͅʍ̌ͩˏɄ˵ࢫ͍͛ͩɄͩʍʳΩࢫ ̛ͩࢫɄɾɾ͍ʍ͛͛ࢫ ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫ͛ˏʳ̌Ʉ˵ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͛ˏʳ̌ࢫ Θˏ̛˵Ʉͩˏ̛̌͛ࢫࢷwhich are a major contributor to collisions in Pleasanton. Between 2020 and 2024, 148 collisions (approximately 19 percent of all crashes) including 7 KSI were attributed to signal violations out of a total of 809 collisions. These crashes are often associatʍɾࢫ Νˏͩ˂ࢫˏ˂ ʳ˂࣒͛ͅʍʍɾࢫ Ʉ̌ʳ˵ʍࢫ Ʉ̌ɾࢫ ͩͷ͍̌ˏ̌ʳࢫ ɲ̛̌ђˏɲͩ͛ࢫ Ʉͩࢫ ͛ˏʳ̌Ʉ˵ˏηʍɾࢫintersections, which tend to result in more severe outcomes. Red-light running is a persistent behavioral issue that cannot be consistently addressed through traditional enforcement alone. Automated enforcement provides a scalable and continuous solution to improve compliance and reduce high-risk violations at intersections. OUTCOME The Automated Red-Light Enforcement Program represents a targeted and data-driven approach to addressing one of PleasɄ̛࣭̌ͩ̌͛ࢫ̛̆͛ͩࢫ͛ˏʳ̌ˏёɲɄ̌ͩࢫɲ̛˵˵ˏ͛ˏ̛̌ࢫɲ̛͍̌ͩˏɩͷͩˏ̌ʳࢫ ʱɄɲ̛͍ͩ͛ࢫࢶ%Ωࢫ̛͍ͅ-viding continuous enforcement at high-risk intersections, this project will improve compliance, reduce severe crash types, and ͛ͷ̛͍ͩͅͅࢫͩ˂ʍࢫ-ˏͩΩ࣭͛ࢫʳ̛Ʉ˵ࢫ̛ʱࢫ͍ʍɾͷɲˏ̌ʳࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲ࣒͍ʍ˵ɄͩʍɾࢫʱɄͩɄ˵ˏͩˏʍ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫserious injuries. • Install red-light camera systems at high-risk signalized intersections
• Utilize automated detection technology to identify violations • Establish a citation review and adjudication process in compliance with California law

AUTOMATED ENFORCEMENT IMPLEMENTATION
• Coordinate with: • Ensure compliance with state statutes governing automated enforcement
• Develop administrative procedures for program operation

1. Pleasanton Police Department
ࢫÌʱёɲʍࢫ࣭͛ʍΩ
̛͍ͩͩ̌ࢫΩͩˏ- 2.

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND COORDINATION
• Conduct public awareness campaigns prior to
implementation
• Provide clear communication regarding:

1. Camera locations 2. Enforcement policies 1. Violation rates 2. Collision trends at camera locations

PUBLIC OUTREACH AND EVALUATION
The proposed program is expected to:• Reduce red-light running violations • Decrease angle and turning-related crashes • Improve intersection safety and compliance • Provide continuous enforcement at high-risk locations Evidence from peer jurisdictions indicates:
• ~20% reduction in total injury crashes • ~24% reduction in right-angle crashes • ~29% reduction in right-angle injury crashes

EXPECTED SAFETY BENEFITS

POLICY AND PROGRAM INITIATIVES

ĤėÌ·
ėH8 þH8ࣙ§†nzė H½kÌþ-H·H½ė öþ̛H-ė PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS • Establish a monitoring and evaluation framework
to track:

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

-˂Ʉ
ɩ̛ͩ 8͍ˏ
Θ
ʍ
öˏ̆˵ˏɲ̛8͍ˏΘʍĊ̛ͩ̌ʍ͍ˏɾʳʍ ·Ʉ˵˵
þ
̛Ʉɾ Ċͩ ̛̌ʍ͍ˏɾʳʍ 8͍ˏΘʍ
zɄɲˏʍ̌ɾ
Ʉ
8͍ˏΘʍ
ŅɄ˵˵ʍΩࢫ
Θʍ̌ͷʍ
-Ʉ͛ʍ
Θʍ ̌
ͷʍ
ŋˏ˵˵̛Νࢫþ̛Ʉɾ
kˏ͍͛ͩࢫĊ͍ͩʍʍͩ
nˏɩ͍ Ʉ˵ͩɄ͍
8 ͍
ˏΘʍ
ĊɄ̌
ͩɄ
þˏͩɄ þ̛
Ʉɾ
·Ʉˏ̌
Ċ͍ͩʍʍͩ
Ċͷ̛̌˵ % ̛ͷ˵ʍΘɄ͍ɾ
˵- ˵ Ÿ̛ ʍ ̌
ͩ ʍ͍
ö Ʉ ͍ ˬΝɄΩ
ÌΝʍ̌͛ 8͍ˏΘʍ
%ʍ͍̌Ʉ˵
Θʍ̌ ͷʍ
k̛
̛ͩ˂ˏ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ
%ͷ͛ɲ˂ࢫþ̛Ʉɾ
›̛
˂
̛̌͛̌ 8͍ˏ Θ ʍ
Ņˏ̌ʍΩɄ͍ɾ
Θʍ̌ͷʍ
k̛̛ͩ˂ˏ ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ


ΩࢫĊʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩ
͛ʍ ·ˏ˵࠸ࢶ࠳ ࠴࠳
-̛˵˵ˏ͛ˏ̛̌͛ࢫɩΩࢫĊʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩ
kɄͩɄ˵ĊʍΘʍ͍ʍࢫ†̌˥ͷ͍ΩŅˏ͛ˏɩ˵ʍࢫ†̌˥ͷ͍Ω-̛̆ͅ˵Ʉˏ̌ͩࢫ̛ʱࢫͅɄˏ̌
!
nnX³X
z ç ³0à0«XÁç
Mode KSI InjuryBicycle 2 14Motorcycle 02Passenger Car or Pickup Truck 5 115Pedestrian 01Truck 03Unknown 0 13Violation Categoryė͍ɄʱёɲࢫĊˏʳ̌Ʉ˵͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫĊˏʳ̌͛ࢫŅˏ̛˵Ʉͩˏ̛̌ 7 148Collision TypeBroadside 7 131Head-On 0 14Hit Object 02Vehicle/Pedestrians 01LocationIntersection 7 148 ³ƺɮƺȸƺ ǣȇǴɖȸɵ
ۏד ًו
!ȒȅȵǼƏǣȇɎ Ȓǔ ȵƏǣȇ
ۏ׏ד ًהו
àǣɀǣƫǼƺ ǣȇǴɖȸɵ
ۏגג ًדה
הג׏
XȇǴɖȸɵ
!ȒǼǼǣɀǣȒȇ
àǣɀ
דה
הג׏
XȇǴɖȸɵ
!ȒǼǼǣɀǣȒȇ

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

ͷ̛ͩ̆Ʉͩʍɾࢫ͛ͅʍʍɾࢫʍ̌ʱ̛͍ɲʍ̆ʍ̌ͩࢫ˂Ʉ͛ࢫɩʍʍ̌ࢫˏɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫɄ͛ࢫɄࢫ̛ͩͅʍ̌-tial strategy to address unsafe speed, which is the leading contributing factor in Pleasanton’s collision history. Between 2020 and 2024, 197 collisions (approximately 24 percent of all crashes) were attributed to unsafe speed including 15 KSI out of a total of 809 injury collisions . Vehicle speed is directly correlated with both crash likelihood and severity, particularly for vulnerable roadway users such as pedestrians and bicyclists. ė͍Ʉɾˏͩˏ̛̌Ʉ˵ࢫ ʍ̌ʱ̛͍ɲʍ̆ʍ̌ͩࢫ Ʉ˵̛̌ʍࢫˏ ͛ࢫ ̛ʱͩʍ̌ࢫˏ ̌͛ͷʱёɲˏʍ̌ͩࢫ ̛ͩࢫ Ʉɾɾ͍ʍ͛͛ࢫwidespread speeding behavior. Automated speed enforcement provides a consistent, data-driven approach to achieving sustained speed reductions across high-risk corridors.

OUTCOMEThe Automated Speed Enforcement Program represents one of the most impactful strategies for addressing Pleasanton’s leading collision contributing factor. If authorized, this program will deliver measurable reductions in speeding and crash severity, supporting the City’s goal of ʍ˵ˏ̆ˏ̌Ʉͩˏ̌ʳ ͍ͩɄʱёɲ ʱɄͩɄ˵ˏͩˏʍ͛and serious injuries.CRASH REDUCTION FACTOR20% • Deploy speed camera systems on high-risk corridors • Prioritize locations based on:

AUTOMATED ENFORCEMENT IMPLEMENTATION
• Ensure compliance with state legislation and local
approvals
• Coordinate with: • Develop administrative procedures for enforcement and citation processing

1. Pleasanton Police Department 2. City leadership and legal teams 1. Documented speeding patterns 2. Collision history 3. Pedestrian activity levels 4. School zones and downtown areas

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND COORDINATION
• Conduct public education and outreach campaigns
prior to activation
• Install advance warning signage for enforcement zones • Implement a warning period before issuing citations • Establish a monitoring framework to track:

1. Speed reductions2. Collision trends

PUBLIC OUTREACH AND EVALUATION
The proposed program is expected to:• Reduce speed-related collisions • Lower operating speeds across targeted corridors • Reduce crash severity, particularly for vulnerable users • Improve overall compliance with speed limits Research indicates:
• Approximately 18.5% reduction in crashes associated
with automated speed enforcement

EXPECTED SAFETY BENEFITS

ĤėÌ·
ėH8 ĊöHH8 H½kÌþ-H·H½ė ࣢†k
ööþÌŅH8ࣣ

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

-˂Ʉɩ̛ͩ 8͍ˏΘ ʍ
öˏ̆˵ˏɲ̛
8͍ˏΘʍ
Ċ̛ͩ̌ʍ͍ˏɾʳʍ ·Ʉ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ
Ċͩ ̛̌ʍ͍ˏɾʳʍ
8͍ˏΘʍ
zɄɲˏʍ̌ɾɄ 8͍ˏΘʍ
ŅɄ˵˵ʍΩࢫ
Θʍ̌ͷʍ
-Ʉ͛ʍ
Θʍ ̌ͷʍ
ŋˏ˵˵̛Νࢫþ̛Ʉɾ
kˏ͍͛ͩࢫĊ͍ͩʍʍͩ
nˏɩ͍
Ʉ˵ͩɄ͍ 8 ͍ ˏΘʍ
ĊɄ̌ͩɄþˏͩɄ þ̛Ʉɾ
·Ʉˏ̌ Ċ͍ͩʍʍͩ
Ċͷ̛̌˵ % ̛ͷ˵ʍΘɄ͍ɾ
˵- ˵ Ÿ̛
ʍ ̌ ͩ ʍ͍ ö Ʉ ͍ ˬΝɄΩ
ÌΝʍ̌͛
8͍ˏΘʍ
%ʍ
͍̌Ʉ˵
Θʍ̌ ͷʍ
k̛̛ͩ˂ˏ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ
%ͷ͛ɲ˂ࢫþ̛Ʉɾ
›̛ ˂ ̛̌͛̌ 8͍ˏ Θ ʍ
Ņˏ̌ʍΩɄ͍ɾ
Θʍ̌ͷʍ
k̛̛ͩ˂ˏ ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ


ΩࢫĊʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩ
ͷ͍Ω
³ƺɮƺȸƺ ǣȇǴɖȸɵ
ۏה ًא׏
!ȒȅȵǼƏǣȇɎ Ȓǔ ȵƏǣȇ
ۏבה ًגא׏
àǣɀǣƫǼƺ ǣȇǴɖȸɵ
ۏחא ًזד
IƏɎƏǼ
ۏא ًב
וח׏
XȇǴɖȸɵ
!ȒǼǼǣɀǣȒȇ
àǣɀ
זד
ۏא ًב
ח׏
ו
XȇǴɖȸɵ
!
ȒǼǼǣɀǣȒȇ
!
nnX³X
z ç ³0à0«XÁç
Mode KSI InjuryBicycle 4 24Electric Bicycle 1 2Electric Scooter 1 5Motorcycle 2 8Others 0 1Passenger Car or Pickup Truck 6 152Pedestrian 1 1Truck 0 3Unknown 0 1Violation CategoryUnsafe Speed 15 197Collision TypeRear End 6 140Hit Object 5 28Others 3 14Vehicle/Pedestrian 1 0LocationIntersection 10 146Roadway Corridor 5 51 ͛ʍ ·ˏ˵࠸ࢶ࠳ ࠴࠳
-̛˵˵ˏ͛ˏ̛̌͛ࢫɩΩࢫĊʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩ
kɄͩɄ˵ĊʍΘʍ͍ʍࢫ†̌˥ͷ͍ΩŅˏ͛ˏɩ˵ʍࢫ†̌˥ͷ͍Ω-̛̆ͅ˵Ʉˏ̌ͩࢫ̛ʱࢫͅɄˏ̌

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

Ċɲ˂̛̛˵ࢫɄ͍ʍɄ͛ࢫ˂ɄΘʍࢫɩʍʍ̌ࢫˏɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫɄ͛ࢫɲ͍ˏͩˏɲɄ˵ࢫ͛ɄʱʍͩΩࢫη̛̌ʍ͛ࢫΝˏͩ˂ˏ̌ࢫPleasanton’s transportation network due to the concentration of pedestrian and vehicular activity during arrival and dismissal periods. Between 2020 and 2024, 212 out of 809 collisions ࣜɄ̛͍ͅͅΦˏ̆Ʉͩʍ˵Ωࢫ ࢫ࠹࠵ ͅʍ͍ɲʍ̌ͩࢫࣝ ̛ɲɲͷ͍͍ʍɾࢫΝˏͩ˂ˏ̌ࢫ Ʉࢫ ͋ͷɄ͍ͩʍ͍ࢫ̆˵ˏʍࢫ ̛ʱࢫschool sites, including 1 fatal collision, 14 severe injuries, 88 visible injuries, and 109 complaints of pain. This concentration of crashes highlights the elevated safety risk in school zones and the need for targeted interventions to protect vulnerable users. Collision analysis indicates that unsafe speed and right-of-way violations account for approximately 47 percent of school-area crashes, with additional contributions from signal violations, ˏ̛͍̆ͅͅʍ͍ࢫͩͷ͍̌ˏ̌ʳࢫࢷɄ̌ɾࢫͅʍɾʍ͍͛ͩˏɄ̌ࢫ͍ˏʳ˂̛࣒ͩʱ࣒ΝɄΩࢫɲ̛̌ђˏɲͩ͛ࢫࢶė˂ʍ͛ʍࢫ͍ͩʍ̌ɾ͛ࢫ ͷ̌ɾʍ͍͛ɲ̛͍ʍࢫ ͩ˂ʍࢫ ɲ̛̆ͅ˵ʍΦˏͩΩࢫ ̛ʱࢫ ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫ ̛ͅʍ͍Ʉͩˏ̛̌͛ࢫ ̌ʍɄ͍ࢫschools and the need for a comprehensive evaluation.

OUTCOMEThe Citywide School Area Circulation Study represents a targeted and high-impact investment in improving safety conditions around Pleasanton’s schools. By addressing the most common contributing factors, particularly unsafe speed and right-ofway violations, the project will create safer environments for students, families, and the broader community, advancing the -ˏͩΩ࣭͛ࢫʳ̛Ʉ˵ࢫ̛ʱࢫ͍ʍɾͷɲˏ̌ʳࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲ࣒͍ʍ˵ɄͩʍɾࢫʱɄͩɄ˵ˏͩˏʍ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͛ʍ͍ˏ̛ͷ͛ࢫˏ̌˥ͷries. • -̛̌ɾͷɲͩࢫɄࢫɲ̛͍̆ͅʍ˂ʍ̌͛ˏΘʍࢫɄ̌Ʉ˵Ω͛ˏ͛ࢫΝˏͩ˂ˏ̌ࢫɄࢫ͋ͷɄ͍ͩʍ͍ࢫ̆˵ˏʍࢫ̛ʱࢫ all school sites
• Evaluate:

1. Pedestrian routes and crossing conditions 2. Intersection and mid-block safety 3. Drop-off and pick-up operations 4. Ņʍ˂ˏɲ˵ʍࢫɲˏ͍ɲͷ˵Ʉͩˏ̛̌ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͋ͷʍͷˏ̌ʳࢫͅɄͩͩʍ͍̌͛ࢫ5. Ċˏʳ˂ͩࢫɾˏ͛ͩɄ̌ɲʍࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫɲ̛̛͍̌ͩ˵ࢫɄɾʍ͋ͷɄɲΩࢫ • -̛˵˵ʍɲͩࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫΘ̛˵ͷ̆ʍ͛ࢫࢷͅʍɾʍ͍͛ͩˏɄ̌ࢫɲ̛ͷ̌ͩ͛ࢫࢷɄ̌ɾࢫёʍ˵ɾࢫ
observations
• -̛̌ɾͷɲͩࢫɲ̛̌ђˏɲͩࢫɄ̌Ʉ˵Ω͛ˏ͛ࢫɾͷ͍ˏ̌ʳࢫͅʍɄˬࢫ͛ɲ˂̛̛˵ࢫͅʍ͍ˏ̛ɾ͛ࢫ• Engage with:

1. School administrators 2. Parents and students 3. Community stakeholders and City staff

DATA COLLECTION AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
• 8ʍΘʍ˵̛ͅࢫ͛ɲ˂̛̛˵࣒͛ͅʍɲˏёɲࢫ͛ɄʱʍͩΩࢫˏ̛͍̆ͅΘʍ̆ʍ̌ͩࢫͅ˵Ʉ̌͛ࢷ
including:
••••• Prioritize improvements based on risk, usage, and safety needs
• 8ʍΘʍ˵̛ͅࢫ͛ɲ˂̛̛˵࣒͛ͅʍɲˏёɲࢫ͛ɄʱʍͩΩࢫˏ̛͍̆ͅΘʍ̆ʍ̌ͩࢫͅ˵Ʉ̌͛ࢷ
including:
••••• Prioritize improvements based on risk, usage, and safety needs

1. Crosswalk enhancements 2. Signage and pavement markings 3. Lighting improvements 4. 8̛̛͍࣒ͅʱʱࣃͅˏɲˬ࣒ͷͅࢫη̛̌ʍࢫ͍ʍɲ̛̌ёʳͷ͍Ʉͩˏ̛̌ࢫ

IMPLEMENTATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed study and improvements are expected to:• Reduce collisions near schools, particularly during peak periods
• Improve safety for vulnerable users, especially children • þʍɾͷɲʍࢫɲ̛̌ђˏɲͩ͛ࢫɩʍͩΝʍʍ̌ࢫΘʍ˂ˏɲ˵ʍ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫͅʍɾʍ͍͛ͩˏɄ̌͛ࢫ• Ȟ˂Ʉ̌ɲʍࢫʍʱёɲˏʍ̌ɲΩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͍ͅʍɾˏɲͩɄɩˏ˵ˏͩΩࢫ̛ʱࢫ͛ɲ˂̛̛˵ࢫɲˏ͍ɲͷ˵Ʉtion patterns

EXPECTED SAFETY BENEFITS

CITYWIDE SCHOOL AREA CIRCULATION STUDY

CITYWIDE SCHOOL CIRCULATION STUDY

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

-˂Ʉɩ̛ͩ 8͍ˏΘ ʍ
öˏ̆˵ˏɲ̛
8͍ˏΘʍ
Ċ̛ͩ̌ʍ͍ˏɾʳʍ·Ʉ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ
Ċͩ ̛̌ʍ͍ˏɾʳʍ
8͍ˏΘʍ
zɄɲˏʍ̌ɾɄ 8͍ˏΘʍ
ŅɄ˵˵ʍΩࢫ
Θʍ̌ͷʍ
-Ʉ͛ʍ
Θʍ ̌ͷʍ
ŋˏ˵˵̛Νࢫþ̛Ʉɾ
kˏ͍͛ͩࢫĊ͍ͩʍʍͩ
nˏɩ͍
Ʉ˵ͩɄ͍ 8 ͍ ˏΘʍ
ĊɄ̌ͩɄþˏͩɄ þ̛Ʉɾ
·Ʉˏ̌ Ċ͍ͩʍʍͩ
Ċͷ̛̌˵ % ̛ͷ˵ʍΘɄ͍ɾ
˵- ˵ Ÿ̛
ʍ ̌ ͩ ʍ͍ ö Ʉ ͍ ˬΝɄΩ
ÌΝʍ̌͛
8͍ˏΘʍ
%ʍ
͍̌Ʉ˵
Θʍ̌ ͷʍ
k̛̛ͩ˂ˏ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ
%ͷ͛ɲ˂ࢫþ̛Ʉɾ
›̛ ˂ ̛̌͛̌ 8͍ˏ Θ ʍ
Ņˏ̌ʍΩɄ͍ɾ
Θʍ̌ͷʍ
k̛̛ͩ˂ˏ ˵˵ þ̛Ʉɾ


ɩΩࢫĊʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩ
†̌˥ͷ͍Ω
†̌˥ͷ͍Ω
³ƺɮƺȸƺ ǣȇǴɖȸɵ
ۏו ًג׏
!ȒȅȵǼƏǣȇɎ Ȓǔ ȵƏǣȇ
ۏ׏ד ًח׎׏
àǣɀǣƫǼƺ ǣȇǴɖȸɵ
ۏאג ًזז
IƏɎƏǼ
ۏ׎ ً׏
א׏א
XȇǴɖȸɵ
!ȒǼǼǣɀǣȒȇ
àǣɀ
זז
ۏ׎ ً׏
א׏א
XȇǴɖȸɵ
!
ȒǼǼǣɀǣȒȇ
!
nnX³X
z ç ³0à0«XÁç
͛ʍ ·ˏ˵࠸ࢶ࠳ ࠴࠳
-̛˵˵ˏ͛ˏ̛̌͛ࢫɩΩࢫĊʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩ
kɄͩɄ˵ĊʍΘʍ͍ʍࢫ†̌˥ͷ͍ΩŅˏ͛ˏɩ˵ʍࢫ†̌˥ͷ͍Ω-̛̆ͅ˵Ʉˏ̌ͩࢫ̛ʱࢫͅɄˏ̌
%ˏɲΩɲ˵ʍࢫkɄɲˏ˵ˏͩˏʍ͛
-˵Ʉ͛͛ࢫ†ࢫ࣒ࢫ%ˬˏʍࢫė͍Ʉˏ˵-˵Ʉ͛͛ˏࢫ††ࢫ࣒ࢫ%†ˬʍࢫ§Ʉ̌ʍ͛-˵Ʉ͛͛ࢫ†††ࢫ࣒ࢫĊ˂Ʉ͍ʍɾࢫ%ˬˏʍࢫ§Ʉ̌ʍ Mode KSI InjuryBicycle 4 45Electric Motorized Board 0 1Electric Scooter 1 3Motorcycle 0 9Others 0 1Passenger Car or Pickup Truck 6 125Pedestrian 3 18Truck 0 3Unknown 1 7Violation CategoryDUI 5 17Unsafe Speed 3 51Automobile right of way 2 49Pedestrian right of way 2 15Collision TypeRear End 3 48Hit Object 3 27Vehicle/Pedestrian 3 18Broadside 2 82LocationIntersection 13 180Roadway Corridor 2 32

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

ė˂ʍࢫ1/2 ʍˏʳ˂ɩ̛͍˂̛̛ɾࢫ ė͍Ʉʱёɲࢫ -Ʉ˵̆ˏ̌ʳࢫ ࣜ1/2ė-ࢫࣝ ơ͍̈ʳ͍Ʉ̆ࢫ ͛ʍ͍Θʍ͛ࢫ Ʉ͛ࢫ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTSPleasanton’s primary mechanism for addressing safety concerns on local streets. Between 2020 and 2024, unsafe speed accounted for approximately 24 percent of the City’s 809 recorded collisions, making it the leading contributing factor in the collision dataset. This trend highlights the importance of maintaining an effective and responsive program to address speeding and safety concerns at the neighborhood level.
͛ࢫ ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫ ɲ̛̌ɾˏͩˏ̛̌͛ࢫࢷ ɲ̛̆̆ͷ̌ˏͩΩࢫ ̌ʍʍɾ͛ࢫࢷ Ʉ̌ɾࢫ ɩʍ͛ͩࢫ ͍ͅɄɲͩˏɲʍ͛ࢫevolve, updating the NTC Program is necessary to ensure it re-̆Ʉˏ̌͛ࢫʍʱʱʍɲͩˏΘʍࢫࢷʍ͋ͷˏͩɄɩ˵ʍࢫࢷɄ̌ɾࢫɄ˵ˏʳ̌ʍɾࢫΝˏͩ˂ࢫɲͷ͍͍ʍ̌ͩࢫ͛ɄʱʍͩΩࢫ͛ͩɄ̌-dards.

OUTCOMEė˂ʍࢫ1/2 ʍˏʳ˂ɩ̛͍˂̛̛ɾࢫ ė͍Ʉʱёɲࢫ -Ʉ˵̆ˏ̌ʳࢫ ơ͍̈ʳ͍Ʉ̆ࢫ ĤͅɾɄͩʍࢫ ʍ̌͛ͷ͍ʍ͛ࢫthat Pleasanton’s primary tool for neighborhood-level safety improvements remains effective, responsive, and aligned with modern best practices. By expanding available treatments and ˏ̛͍̆ͅΘˏ̌ʳࢫ̛͍ͅʳ͍Ʉ̆ࢫ̛͍ͅɲʍ͛͛ʍ͛ࢫࢷͩ˂ʍࢫ-ˏͩΩࢫΝˏ˵˵ࢫɩʍࢫɩʍͩͩʍ͍ࢫʍ͋ͷˏͅͅʍɾࢫto address speeding and safety concerns across all neighbor-˂̛̛ɾ͛ࢫࢷ͛ͷ̛͍ͩͅͅˏ̌ʳࢫˏͩ͛ࢫʳ̛Ʉ˵ࢫ̛ʱࢫ ͍ʍɾͷɲˏ̌ʳࢫ ͍ͩɄʱёɲ࣒͍ʍ˵Ʉͩʍɾࢫ ʱɄͩɄ˵ˏͩˏʍ͛ࢫand serious injuries. • ††̌ɲ̛̛͍͍ͅɄͩʍࢫɄࢫɩ̛͍Ʉɾʍ͍ࢫ͍Ʉ̌ʳʍࢫ̛ʱࢫ̆ʍɄ͛ͷ͍ʍ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ̌ʍΝࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫ calming tools, including:

1. Raised crosswalks 2. Curb extensions 3. Median islands 4. Enhanced signage and pavement markings

EXPANDED TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLKIT
• Establish clear and transparent thresholds for
eligibility and prioritization
• Improve program accessibility for all neighborhoods • Streamline administrative processes to:

1. Reduce implementation timelines 2. †̛͍̆ͅΘʍࢫ͍ʍ̛͛̌͛ͅˏΘʍ̌ʍ͛͛ࢫ̛ͩࢫɲ̛̆̆ͷ̌ˏͩΩࢫ͍ʍ͋ͷʍ͛ͩ͛ࢫ

EQUITABLE AND STREAMLINED IMPLEMENTATION
• Engage residents and stakeholders throughout
the update process
• Incorporate community feedback into program
improvements
• Engage residents and stakeholders throughout
the update process
• Incorporate community feedback into program
improvements

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
The updated program is expected to:• Reduce speed-related collisions on local streets • Improve pedestrian safety in residential areas • Enhance community satisfaction and engagement • †̌ɲ͍ʍɄ͛ʍࢫʍʱёɲˏʍ̌ɲΩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͍ͩɄ̌͛ͅɄ͍ʍ̌ɲΩࢫˏ̌ࢫ̛͍ͅʳ͍Ʉ̆ࢫɾʍ˵ˏΘery

EXPECTED SAFETY BENEFITS

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM UPDATE
• Evaluate existing:
• Update program framework based on:

1. þʍ͋ͷʍ͛ͩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͍ʍΘˏʍΝࢫ̛͍ͅɲʍɾͷ͍ʍ͛ࢫ2. Eligibility criteria 3. Evaluation metrics 4.
ΘɄˏ˵Ʉɩ˵ʍࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫɲɄ˵̆ˏ̌ʳࢫ̆ʍɄ͛ͷ͍ʍ͛ࢫ1. National and state best practices 2.
ɾΘɄ̌ɲʍ͛ࢫˏ̌ࢫ͋ͷˏɲˬ࣒ɩͷˏ˵ɾࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ˵̛Ν࣒ɲ̛͛ͩࢫ͛ɄʱʍͩΩࢫ͍ͩʍɄͩ- ments, i.e. speed lumps and radar speed signs.

PROGRAM REVIEW AND UPDATE

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

Ĥ̌͛Ʉʱʍࢫ͛ͅʍʍɾࢫ˂Ʉ͛ࢫɩʍʍ̌ࢫˏɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫɄ͛ࢫͩ˂ʍࢫ˵ʍɄɾˏ̌ʳࢫɲ̛͍̌ͩˏɩͷͩˏ̌ʳࢫfactor in Pleasanton’s collision history. Between 2020 and 2024, 197 out of 809 collisions (approximately 24 percent) were at-͍ͩˏɩͷͩʍɾࢫ ̛ͩࢫͷ̌͛Ʉʱʍࢫ͛ͅʍʍɾࢫࢷ̆Ʉˬˏ̌ʳࢫˏͩࢫ ͩ˂ʍࢫ̛̆͛ͩࢫ͛ˏʳ̌ˏёɲɄ̌ͩࢫɾ͍ˏΘʍ͍ࢫ̛ʱࢫɲ͍Ʉ͛˂ࢫʱ͍ʍ͋ͷʍ̌ɲΩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͛ʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩࢫˏ̌ࢫͩ˂ʍࢫ-ˏͩΩࢫࢶė˂ʍࢫ͍ʍ˵Ʉͩˏ̛̌͛˂ˏͅࢫbetween vehicle speed and injury severity underscores the need for a comprehensive, systemwide approach to managing speeds across the roadway network. The Citywide Speed Reduction Strategy establishes a coordinated program grounded in the Safe System Approach, integrating engineering, policy, and behavioral strategies to reduce operating speeds and minimize the likelihood of severe and fatal injuries.

OUTCOMEThe Citywide Speed Reduction Strategy represents Pleasanton’s most comprehensive response to its leading safety challenge. By addressing the approximately 24 percent of collisions attributed to unsafe speed, this program will reduce both crash ʱ͍ʍ͋ͷʍ̌ɲΩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͛ʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩࢫࢷɄɾΘɄ̌ɲˏ̌ʳࢫͩ˂ʍࢫ-ˏͩΩ࣭͛ࢫʳ̛Ʉ˵ࢫ̛ʱࢫʍ˵ˏ̆ˏ̌Ʉͩˏ̌ʳࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫʱɄͩɄ˵ˏͩˏʍ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͛ʍ͍ˏ̛ͷ͛ࢫˏ̌˥ͷ͍ˏʍ͛ࢶ -†ėŖŋ†8H ĊöHH8 þH8Ĥ-ė†Ì½ Ċėþ
ėHnŖ ࣢Ċ
kH ĊŖĊėH· ĊöHH8 ·
½
nH·H½ė öþÌnþ
·ࣣ

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The updated program is expected to:• Reduce speed-related collisions on local streets • Improve pedestrian safety in residential areas • Enhance community satisfaction and engagement • †̌ɲ͍ʍɄ͛ʍࢫʍʱёɲˏʍ̌ɲΩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͍ͩɄ̌͛ͅɄ͍ʍ̌ɲΩࢫˏ̌ࢫ̛͍ͅʳ͍Ʉ̆ delivery

EXPECTED SAFETY BENEFITS
• Evaluate opportunities to lower statutory speed limits under California local authority provisions
• Develop and implement a citywide speed management policy framework • Integrate speed management into Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and corridor projects

POLICY AND PROGRAM ACTIONS
• Conduct public education campaigns on the relationship between speed and crash severity • Promote community awareness of safe driving behaviors • Coordinate with enforcement programs to reinforce compliance

EDUCATION AND BEHAVIORAL STRATEGIES
The proposed program is expected to:• Reduce speed-related collisions • Lower crash severity, particularly for vulnerable users • Improve compliance with speed limits • Enhance overall safety and livability of streets

EXPECTED SAFETY BENEFITS
• Prioritize corridors based on:

TARGETED IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH

1. History of speed-related crashes 2. Proximity to schools, parks, and community destinations

3. Presence of vulnerable roadway users
• Implement a phased rollout strategy across multiple
corridors

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

The City of Pleasanton has developed a collision data dashboard as part of the PTSAP to support data-driven decision-making. Expanding and enhancing this platform is critical to maintaining transparency, improving project evaluation, and tracking progress toward the City’s safety goals over time. The Enhanced Dashboard Project transforms the existing platform into a comprehensive safety management system that integrates data, evaluates countermeasure effectiveness, and supports ongoing planning and investment decisions.

OUTCOMEThe Enhanced Safety Data Dashboard establishes a comprehensive, transparent, and data-driven framework for managing Pleasanton’s transportation safety efforts. By linking data, performance monitoring, and project implementation, this system ensures that safety investments are measurable, effective, and continuously improved—supporting the City’s goal of reducing ͍ͩɄʱёɲ࣒͍ʍ˵ɄͩʍɾࢫʱɄͩɄ˵ˏͩˏʍ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͛ʍ͍ˏ̛ͷ͛ࢫˏ̌˥ͷ͍ˏʍ͛ࢶ

ENHANCED SAFETY DATA DASHBOARD AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
• Integrate multiple data sources, including:

ENHANCED DATA INTEGRATION AND ANALYTICS

1. Collision data 2. Signal Performance Measures (SPM) 3. Speed and volume data 4. þʍɾ࣒ˏ˵ʳ˂ͩࢫ͍ͷ̌̌ˏ̌ʳࢫɄ̌ɾࢫɲͷ࣒ͩͩ˂̛͍ͷʳ˂ࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫɾɄͩɄࢫ • Utilize data from:
• Link implemented countermeasures to:

SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE EVALUATIONFRAMEWORK

1. Collision data 2. Location and implementation timelines

1. -˂Ʉ̌ʳʍ͛ࢫˏ̌ࢫɲ̛˵˵ˏ͛ˏ̛̌ࢫʱ͍ʍ͋ͷʍ̌ɲΩࢫ2. Changes in severity outcomes • Conduct before-and-after analyses to measure: • Proactive countermeasures • Provide real-time and ongoing safety performance
tracking
• Apply: • Maintain a public-facing dashboard to support transparency and accountability

MONITORING AND REPORTING

1. -͍Ʉ͛˂ࢫ·̛ɾˏёɲɄͩˏ̛̌ࢫkɄɲ̛͍ͩ͛ࣜࢫ-·k͛ࢫࣝ2. Highway Safety Manual methodologies

1. ė͍Ʉʱёɲࢫ͛ʍ̛͍̌͛͛ࢫ2. Smart infrastructure 3. Third-party platforms (e.g., Iteris, INRIX) The enhanced dashboard is expected to:• Improve data-driven decision-making • Strengthen project prioritization and funding competitiveness
• Enable continuous monitoring of safety performance • Increase transparency and public accountability • Support adaptive and responsive safety planning

EXPECTED SAFETY BENEFITS

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

öþ̛H-ė öþ†Ìþ†ė†ţ
ė†Ì½ŋ˂ˏ˵ʍࢫ Ʉ˵˵ࢫ ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫˏ ɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫˏ ̌ࢫ ͩ˂ʍࢫ ö˵ʍɄ͛Ʉ̛̌ͩ̌ࢫ ė͍Ʉ̛͍̌͛ͩͅɄͩˏ̛̌ࢫSafety Action Plan (PTSAP) address important safety needs, a structured delivery framework is used to guide implementation and ensure that investments align with the plan’s safety goals and objectives. This framework supports transparent, data-driven decision-making and helps the City focus resources on projects that will have the greatest impact on reducing trafёɲࢫʱɄͩɄ˵ˏͩˏʍ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͛ʍ͍ˏ̛ͷ͛ࢫˏ̌˥ͷ͍ˏʍ͛ࢶThe High Injury Network (HIN) provides the foundation for identifying corridors and intersections with the greatest safety risks in Pleasanton. Building on this analysis, the project delivery process evaluates and ranks potential improvements within these high-risk locations to ensure that investments are directed toward projects with the greatest potential to reduce fatalities and serious injuries.In addition to safety performance and community priorities, the ɾʍ˵ˏΘʍ͍Ωࢫʱ͍Ʉ̆ʍΝ̛͍ˬࢫˏ͛ࢫɾʍ͛ˏʳ̌ʍɾࢫ̛ͩࢫɄ˵ˏʳ̌ࢫΝˏͩ˂ࢫɲ̛̛̆̆̌ࢫ͍ʍ͋ͷˏ͍ʍments of federal, state, and regional funding programs. This includes consideration of applicable grant criteria, local match re-͋ͷˏ͍ʍ̆ʍ̌ͩ͛ࢫࢷɄ̌ɾࢫͩ˂ʍࢫɄɩˏ˵ˏͩΩࢫ̛ʱࢫ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫ̛ͩࢫɲ̛̆ͅʍͩʍࢫʍʱʱʍɲͩˏΘʍ˵Ωࢫʱ̛͍ࢫfunding. By integrating these factors into the scoring process, ͩ˂ʍࢫ-ˏͩΩࢫɲɄ̌ࢫ̛͍̆ʍࢫʍʱёɲˏʍ̌ͩ˵Ωࢫˏɾʍ̌ͩˏʱΩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫɄɾΘɄ̌ɲʍࢫ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫͩ˂Ʉͩare not only needed, but also well-positioned to secure external funding. This approach allows the City to focus on projects that meet multiple funding criteria, improving competitiveness and increasing the likelihood of successful grant applications.öėĊ
öࢫʍΘɄ˵ͷɄͩʍ͛ࢫ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫͷ͛ˏ̌ʳࢫɄࢫ͛ʍͩࢫ̛ʱࢫˬʍΩࢫɲ͍ˏͩʍ͍ˏɄࢫͩ˂Ʉͩࢫ͍ʍђʍɲͩࢫsafety performance, community needs, implementation considerations, and funding readiness. These criteria include: • ĊɄʱʍͩΩࢫ%ʍ̌ʍёͩ͛ࢫ • %ʍ̌ʍёͩࢫ̛ͩࢫŅͷ˵̌ʍ͍Ʉɩ˵ʍࢫþ̛ɄɾࢫĤ͛ʍ͍͛ࢫ • School Safety Impact • Community Need and Access Considerations (including underserved and low-income areas) • Community Input and Support • Ease of Implementation • Applicable Grant Opportunities and Funding Readiness (including eligibility requirements, scoring criteria, and lo- cal match considerations) Each project is scored based on these criteria, and weighted scores are used to establish overall project priority. In cases where projects receive similar scores, additional factors such as collision severity, location within the High Injury Network (HIN), funding readiness, and implementation feasibility are used to further differentiate priorities. Projects that include multiple improvements along a corridor are grouped under a single priority ranking, with individual el- ʍ̆ʍ̌ͩ͛ࢫˏ ɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫ Ʉ͛ࢫ ͛ͷɩ̛࣒͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫ ࣜʍࢶʳࢫࢷࢶ
ࢫࢷ %ࢫࢷ -ࢫࢶࣝ k̛͍ࢫ ɲ̛͍͍ˏɾ̛͍͛ where improvements can be implemented in phases, projects that are lower-cost, easier to implement, or provide immedi- Ʉͩʍࢫ͛ɄʱʍͩΩࢫɩʍ̌ʍёͩ͛ࢫ̆ɄΩࢫɩʍࢫɄɾΘɄ̌ɲʍɾࢫё͍͛ͩࢫࢷΝ˂ˏ˵ʍࢫ̛͍̆ʍࢫɲ̛̆ͅ˵ʍΦࢫ improvements are programmed for later phases. For example, striping, signage, and signal timing changes may be imple- mented in the near term, while larger capital improvements ͛ͷɲ˂ࢫɄ͛ࢫ̛͍ɄɾΝɄΩࢫ͍ʍɲ̛̌ёʳͷ͍Ʉͩˏ̛̌ࢫ̛͍ࢫɲ̛̆ͅ˵ʍͩʍࢫ͍͛ͩʍʍͩࢫ͍ͩʍɄͩ̆ʍ̌ͩ͛ࢫ ̆ɄΩࢫ͍ʍ͋ͷˏ͍ʍࢫɄɾɾˏͩˏ̛̌Ʉ˵ࢫͅ˵Ʉ̌̌ˏ̌ʳࢫࢷɾʍ͛ˏʳ̌ࢫࢷɄ̌ɾࢫʱͷ̌ɾˏ̌ʳࢶ ė˂ʍࢫ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩࢫˏ˵͛ͩࢫˏ͛ࢫˏ̌ͩʍ̌ɾʍɾࢫ̛ͩࢫ͛ʍ͍ΘʍࢫɄ͛ࢫɄࢫђʍΦˏɩ˵ʍࢫˏ̆ͅ˵ʍ̆ʍ̌ͩɄͩˏ̛̌ࢫ guide. The City may advance projects based on funding avail- ability, alignment with grant cycles, coordination with other planned improvements, or emerging safety needs. Additional- ly, individual elements of a project may be implemented inde- pendently as opportunities arise. Cost estimates provided in PTSAP are planning-level estimates based on current data and typical construction costs. Actual ɲ̛͛ͩ͛ࢫ̆ɄΩࢫ ΘɄ͍Ωࢫ ɾʍͅʍ̌ɾˏ̌ʳࢫ ̛̌ࢫ ͛ˏͩʍ࣒͛ͅʍɲˏёɲࢫ ɲ̛̌ɾˏͩˏ̛̌͛ࢫࢷ ɾʍ͛ˏʳ̌ࢫ ͍ʍ͋ͷˏ͍ʍ̆ʍ̌ͩ͛ࢫࢷ Ʉ̌ɾࢫ ̆Ʉ͍ˬʍͩࢫ ʱɄɲ̛͍ͩ͛ࢫࢶ ö˵Ʉ̌̌ˏ̌ʳ࣒˵ʍΘʍ˵ࢫ ɲ̛͛ͩࢫ ʍ͛ͩˏ- mates are included in the appendices to support project devel- opment and funding applications.

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

Criteria Description Weight (100 percent)
ĊɄʱʍͩΩࢫ%ʍ̌ʍёͩ͛ HΘɄ˵ͷɄͩʍ͛ࢫͩ˂ʍࢫ͛ʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫʱ͍ʍ͋ͷʍ̌ɲΩࢫ̛ʱࢫɲ̛˵˵ˏ͛ˏ̛̌͛ࢫɄͩࢫͩ˂ʍࢫ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩࢫ˵̛ɲɄͩˏ̛̌ࢫͷ͛ˏ̌ʳࢫɄࢫ͛ʍΘʍ͍ˏͩΩࢫˏ̌ɾʍΦࢫɩɄ͛ʍɾࢫ̛̌ࢫɲ̛˵˵ˏ͛ˏ̛̌ࢫɾɄͩɄࢫࢶ Higher-risk locations receive higher scores. 30 percent %ʍ̌ʍёͩࢫ̛ͩࢫŅͷ˵̌ʍ͍Ʉɩ˵ʍࢫþ̛ɄɾࢫĤ͛ʍ͍͛ Projects that improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, and persons with disabilities receive higher scores. 15 percent School Safety Impact Projects located near schools or along key school routes receive higher priority due to the presence of students and increased pedestrian activity. 15 percent Community Need and Access
Considerations
Considers how projects improve transportation access and safety in underserved and low-income areas, as well as locations with limited transportation options. 10 percent Community Input and Support þʍђʍɲͩ͛ࢫʱʍʍɾɩɄɲˬࢫ͍ʍɲʍˏΘʍɾࢫͩ˂̛͍ͷʳ˂ࢫͅͷɩ˵ˏɲࢫ̛ͷ͍ͩʍɄɲ˂ࢫࢷ͛ͩɄˬʍ˂̛˵ɾʍ͍ࢫʍ̌ʳɄʳʍ̆ʍ̌ͩࢫࢷɄ̌ɾࢫ͍ͅˏ̛͍ࢫͅ˵Ʉ̌̌ˏ̌ʳࢫʍʱʱ̛͍ͩ͛ࢶ 10 percent Ease of Implementation

͛͛ʍ͛͛ʍ͛ࢫ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩࢫɲ̛̆ͅ˵ʍΦˏͩΩࢫࢷΝˏͩ˂ࢫˏ˂ʳ˂ʍ͍ࢫ͛ɲ̛͍ʍ͛ࢫɄ͛͛ˏʳ̌ʍɾࢫ̛ͩࢫ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫͩ˂ɄͩࢫɲɄ̌ࢫɩʍࢫˏ̆ͅ˵ʍ̆ʍ̌ͩʍɾࢫ͋ͷˏɲˬ˵ΩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫɲ̛࣒͛ͩʍʱʱʍɲͩˏΘʍ˵Ωࣜࢫʍࢶʳࢫࢷࢶ͍͛ͩˏͅˏ̌ʳࢫࢷ͛ˏʳ̌ɄʳʍࢫࢷࣝɄ̌ɾࢫ˵̛Νʍ͍ࢫ͛ɲ̛͍ʍ͛ࢫʱ̛͍ࢫ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫ͍ʍ͋ͷˏ͍ˏ̌ʳࢫ͛ˏʳ̌ˏёɲɄ̌ͩࢫɾʍ͛ˏʳ̌ࢫࢷ͍ˏʳ˂̛࣒ͩʱ࣒ΝɄΩࢫࢷ̛͍ࢫconstruction. 10 percent
Applicable Grant Opportunities and
Funding Readiness
Evaluates how well a project aligns with common grant program criteria, including eligibility, competitiveness, readiness, Ʉ̌ɾࢫɄɩˏ˵ˏͩΩࢫ̛ͩࢫ̆ʍʍͩࢫ˵̛ɲɄ˵ࢫ̆Ʉͩɲ˂ࢫ͍ʍ͋ͷˏ͍ʍ̆ʍ̌ͩ͛ࢫࢶơ͍̈˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫͩ˂ɄͩࢫɄ˵ˏʳ̌ࢫΝˏͩ˂ࢫ̆ͷ˵ͩˏͅ˵ʍࢫʱͷ̌ɾˏ̌ʳࢫ̛͛ͷ͍ɲʍ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͛ɲ̛͍ˏ̌ʳࢫ͍ͅˏ̛͍ˏͩˏʍ͛ࢫ receive higher scores.
10 percent

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

07 PROGRESSANDTRANSPARENCY

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

Chapter 7:PROGRESS AND TRANSPARENCYThe success of the Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan (PTSAP) depends on the City’s ability to implement improvements effectively, track progress, and communicate outcomes transparently. This chapter establishes a framework for advancing safety projects, monitoring performance, securing funding, and ensuring accountability over time.By integrating implementation with ongoing evaluation and public reporting, the City of Pleasanton is committed to a transparent, data-driven process that supports continuous improvement and measurable progress toward reducing and ultimate-˵Ωࢫʍ˵ˏ̆ˏ̌Ʉͩˏ̌ʳࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫʱɄͩɄ˵ˏͩˏʍ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͛ʍ͍ˏ̛ͷ͛ࢫˏ̌˥ͷ͍ˏʍ͛ࢶ IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGYĊͷɲɲʍ͛͛ʱͷ˵ࢫˏ ̆ͅ˵ʍ̆ʍ̌ͩɄͩˏ̛̌ࢫ ̛ʱࢫ ͩ˂ʍࢫ öėĊ
öࢫ Νˏ˵˵ࢫ ͍ʍ͋ͷˏ͍ʍࢫ ̛͍͛ͩ̌ʳࢫcoordination across City departments and collaboration with key partners, including regional agencies, transit providers, law enforcement, emergency responders, schools, and community organizations. Implementation of the PTSAP will be carried out through coordinated efforts across City departments and in collaboration with regional and local partners. This includes coordination with agencies such as Caltrans, Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC), and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as well as local stakeholders including schools, transit providers, and public safety agencies.The City will continue to utilize a multidisciplinary stakeholder working group to guide implementation, review progress, and address emerging safety challenges. This collaborative approach ensures that safety improvements are comprehensive Ʉ̌ɾࢫ ͍ʍђʍɲͩࢫ ͩ˂ʍࢫ ̌ʍʍɾ͛ࢫ ̛ʱࢫ ͩ˂ʍࢫ ɲ̛̆̆ͷ̌ˏͩΩࢫࢶ †ͩࢫ Ʉ˵̛͛ࢫ ʍ̌͛ͷ͍ʍ͛ࢫ ͩ˂Ʉͩࢫsafety is embedded into all transportation-related decisions and investments.ĊɄʱʍͩΩࢫ͍͛ͩɄͩʍʳˏʍ͛ࢫˏɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫˏ̌ࢫͩ˂ʍࢫöėĊ
öࢫΝˏ˵˵ࢫɩʍࢫˏ̌ͩʍʳ͍Ʉͩʍɾࢫˏ̛̌ͩࢫ existing City processes, including:
• Capital Improvement Program (CIP) • Pavement management and roadway rehabilitation projects • Development review and permitting processes • Corridor and intersection improvement initiatives The City will pursue a combination of funding sources including SS4A, HSIP, ATP, STBG, and CMAQ, to advance implementation. ơ͍̈˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫˏ ɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫ ͩ˂̛͍ͷʳ˂ࢫ ͩ˂ʍࢫ k̛ɲͷ͛ʍɾࢫ zˏʳ˂ࢫ †̌˥ͷ͍Ωࢫ1/2 ʍͩΝ̛͍ˬࢫ(HIN) and prioritization framework will be positioned to compete effectively for these funding opportunities.MONITORING AND EVALUATIONThe City of Pleasanton will establish a robust monitoring and evaluation framework to track progress and assess the effectiveness of implemented safety improvements.Key performance measures will include:
• Total number of collisions • Killed and Severely Injured (KSI) collisions • Collisions by mode (pedestrian, bicycle, vehicle) • Vehicle speeds and compliance trends • Community feedback and engagement outcomes To support transparency and accessibility, the City will develop tools such as a GIS-based dashboard to track safety performance and implementation progress over time.

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

Annual reviews will be conducted with key stakeholders to evalͷɄͩʍࢫ̛͍ͅʳ͍ʍ͛͛ࢫࢷˏɾʍ̌ͩˏʱΩࢫʳɄ͛ͅࢫࢷɄ̌ɾࢫ͍ʍё̌ʍࢫ͍͛ͩɄͩʍʳˏʍ͛ࢫࢶė˂ˏ͛ࢫ̛͍ͅɲʍ͛͛ࢫensures that the PTSAP remains responsive to changing conditions and continues to deliver measurable safety improvements.MEASURING EFFECTIVENESS OF SAFETY PROJECTSEvaluating the effectiveness of safety improvements is critical to ensuring that investments are achieving intended outcomes. The City will conduct before-and-after analyses for implemented projects to measure their impact.Pre-Implementation Data CollectionPrior to implementation, baseline data will be collected,including:• Collision data (type, severity, contributing factors) • ė͍ɄʱёɲࢫΘ̛˵ͷ̆ʍ͛ࣜࢫΘʍ˂ˏɲ˵ʍࢫࢷͅʍɾʍ͍͛ͩˏɄ̌ࢫࢷɩˏɲΩɲ˵ʍࢫࣝ• Speed data (e.g., 85th percentile speeds) • Ìɩ͛ʍ͍Θʍɾࢫͷ͛ʍ͍ࢫɩʍ˂ɄΘˏ̛͍ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫɲ̛̌ђˏɲͩࢫͅɄͩͩʍ͍̌͛ࢫ Post-Implementation EvaluationAfter implementation (typically within one to three years), the same data will be collected and compared to baseline conditions to assess performance.Performance MeasuresProject effectiveness will be evaluated based on:
• Changes in total and KSI collisions • Changes in vehicle speeds • þʍɾͷɲͩˏ̛̌ࢫˏ̌ࢫɲ̛̌ђˏɲͩ͛ࢫɩʍͩΝʍʍ̌ࢫ̛͍ɄɾΝɄΩࢫͷ͛ʍ͍͛ࢫ • Improvements in compliance (e.g., yielding behavior)
For behavioral safety initiatives, additional indicators may include:
• Speeding violations • DUI-related citations • Observed compliance rates Findings will be documented in Project Evaluation Reports, which will inform future project design and implementation strategies.

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

FUNDING STRATEGY AND OPPORTUNITIESThe City of Pleasanton will leverage a diverse range of funding sources to implement the safety improve-̆ʍ̌ͩ͛ࢫˏ ɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫˏ ̌ࢫ öėĊ
öࢫࢶ ė˂ʍ͛ʍࢫˏ ̌ɲ˵ͷɾʍࢫ ʱʍɾʍ͍Ʉ˵ࢫࢷstate, regional, and local programs that support infrastructure, education, enforcement, and planning efforts.ö͍ˏ̛͍ˏͩΩࢫ ̛͍ͅ˥ʍɲͩ͛ࢫˏ ɾʍ̌ͩˏёʍɾࢫ ͩ˂̛͍ͷʳ˂ࢫ ͩ˂ʍࢫ k̛ɲͷ͛ʍɾࢫHigh Injury Network (HIN) and project prioritization framework will be positioned to compete effectively for competitive grant programs such as SS4A, HSIP, and ATP. The City will also coordinate with regional partners, including Alameda CTC and MTC, to align funding applications with regional priorities and maximize funding opportunities. In the Bay Area, the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) program serves as a key mechanism for distributing federal transportation funds through Alameda CTC, making it a critical funding source for advancing Pleasanton’s prioritized safety projects.Local funding sources, including the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and development impact fees, Νˏ˵˵ࢫɩʍࢫͷ͛ʍɾࢫ̛ͩࢫ͛ͷ̛͍ͩͅͅࢫ̆Ʉͩɲ˂ˏ̌ʳࢫ͍ʍ͋ͷˏ͍ʍ̆ʍ̌ͩ͛ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫadvance near-term improvements. The City will also explore innovative funding approaches, including public-private partnerships, to supplement traditional funding sources.Table below summarizes key funding programs and their applicability to Pleasanton.

Funding Source Funding Agency Program Description Typical Funding Range / Availability Notes for Pleasanton Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) USDOT / FHWA Supports safety planning and implementation ~$2M – $25M+ per grant Strong alignment with PTSAP and Focused HIN Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Caltrans / FHWA Funds infrastructure safety improvements ~$500K – $10M per project Ideal for intersection and systemic safety Active Transportation Program (ATP) CTC / Caltrans Funds bicycle/pedestrian improvements ~$1M – $15M per project Ċ̛͍ͩ̌ʳࢫёͩࢫʱ̛͍ࢫŅþĤ࣒ʱ̛ɲͷ͛ʍɾࢫ corridors Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG)
MTC / FHWA Flexible transportation funding Varies; regional allocation Supports multimodal corridor improvements Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ)
MTC / FHWA Funds emission-reducing projects ~$500K – $10M Eligible for signal and multimodal projects One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) MTC / Alameda CTC Regional distribution of STBG and CMAQ funds ~$500K – $10M+ per project Key funding source for Pleasanton through Alameda CTC Alameda CTC Measure BB Alameda CTC Local sales tax funding ~$2M – $6M annually Supports local match and safety projectsÌʱёɲʍࢫ̛ʱࢫė͍ɄʱёɲࢫĊɄʱʍͩΩࢫ(OTS) State of CA Education and enforcement grants ~$50K – $500K Supports behavioral programsSafe Routes to School (SRTS) Caltrans (ATP) School-area safety improvements ~$250K – $5M Ċ̛͍ͩ̌ʳࢫёͩࢫʱ̛͍ࢫ͛ɲ˂̛̛˵ࢫη̛̌ʍ͛ City CIP City of Pleasanton Local capital program Varies annually Key for matching and im- plementation Local Transportation Fund (LTF) CTPA / MTC
Funding opportunities for deveopment and improvement of bicy cle and pedestrian facilities ~$150K – $300K Ċ̛͍ͩ̌ʳࢫёͩࢫʱ̛͍ࢫöʍɾࣃ%ˬˏʍࢫˏ̆- provements

Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan

CONTINUAL MONITORING AND PLAN UPDATESöėĊ
öࢫΝˏ˵˵ࢫɩʍࢫ͍ͩʍɄͩʍɾࢫɄ͛ࢫɄࢫˏ˵Θˏ̌ʳࢫɾ̛ɲͷ̆ʍ̌ͩࢫࢷΝˏͩ˂ࢫͅʍ͍ˏ̛ɾˏɲࢫͷͅɾɄͩʍ͛ࢫ̛ͩࢫ͍ʍђʍɲͩࢫ̌ʍΝࢫɾɄͩɄࢫࢷʍ̆ʍ͍ʳing trends, and evolving best practices. The City will review and update the plan approximately ʍΘʍ͍ΩࢫёΘʍࢫΩʍɄ͍͛ࢶUpdates will incorporate:• §Ʉͩʍ͛ͩࢫɲ̛˵˵ˏ͛ˏ̛̌ࢫɄ̌ɾࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫɾɄͩɄࢫ• Changes in land use and development • Feedback from the community and stakeholders • Evaluation of implemented strategies and projects This iterative process ensures that the PTSAP remains relevant, responsive, and effective in guiding long-term safety improvements.

COMMITMENT TO TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITYTransparency and accountability are central to the success of PTSAP. The City of Pleasanton is committed to openly sharing progress, reporting outcomes, and engaging the community throughout implementation.The plan and related updates will be made publicly accessible on the City’s website:https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/our-government/traffic-engineering/transportation-safety-action-plan/.Through regular reporting, performance tracking, and ongoing stakeholder engagement, the -ˏͩΩࢫΝˏ˵˵ࢫʍ̌͛ͷ͍ʍࢫͩ˂Ʉͩࢫ͛ɄʱʍͩΩࢫ͍ʍ̆Ʉˏ̌͛ࢫɄࢫ͍ͅˏ̛͍ˏͩΩࢫɄ̌ɾࢫͩ˂Ʉͩࢫ̛͍ͅʳ͍ʍ͛͛ࢫ̛ͩΝɄ͍ɾࢫʍ˵ˏ̆ˏ̌Ʉͩˏ̌ʳࢫ͍ͩɄʱёɲࢫʱɄͩɄ˵ˏties and serious injuries is measurable, visible, and sustained over time.

Item #4

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
May 19, 2026
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: AUTHORIZE SUBMITTAL OF A FEDERAL GRANT APPLICATION TO THE

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE SAFE

STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL - IMPLEMENTATION GRANT FOR THE AMOUNT OF $25,000,000

SUMMARY
The United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) to solicit applications for the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant.

The SS4A Grant will be awarded on a competitive basis and will support agencies in planning, infrastructure implementation, and operational improvements to prevent deaths and serious injuries on roads across all modes of transportation. Applications are due on May 26, 2026.

TJKM Transportation Consultants, who assisted the City in developing the Pleasanton Transportation Safety Plan (PTSAP), which is separately recommended for adoption at this May 19, 2026 City Council Meeting, also aided staff in developing the SS4A Implementation Grant application. TJKM has had recent successful experience securing SS4A Grants for communities like Pleasanton. Staff recommends submitting an implementation grant application requesting the maximum grant amount of $25,000,000 ($25 Million) for the Santa Rita Road Safety Project.

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize submittal of a Federal Grant Application to the United States Department of Transportation for the Safe Streets and Roads for All - Implementation Grant for the amount of $25,000,000.

BACKGROUND
The Federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was passed in November 2021, establishing the new Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) discretionary program and tasking the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) with distributing $5 billion over five years. This is the final year of the current cycle. A proposed SS4A program extension is currently in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The SS4A grant offers funding for two project types: Planning and Demonstration Activities or Implementation. The goal of the SS4A Grant is to help agencies prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries for all roadway users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation users, motorists, and micromobility users. The SS4A Grant supports elements of the US DOT’s Safe System Approach, with objectives that aim to produce safer people, safer roads, safer vehicles, safer speeds, and post-crash care.

The City was awarded an SS4A Planning Grant in late 2023 to develop the Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan (PTSAP). The City Council authorized a cost-sharing agreement with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in October 2024, and work for the

PTSAP started in earnest in July 2025. Staff is requesting that the City Council adopt the PTSAP at the May 19, 2026 City Council meeting as a separate agenda item, with the SS4A application contingent on having an adopted and current Transportation Safety Action Plan in place. Jurisdictions submitting an SS4A Implementation Grant must complete a SelfCertification Worksheet with their application package. Should the City Council not adopt the separately agendized PTSAP on May 19, staff would not be able to submit the proposed application.

DISCUSSION
The Fiscal Year 2026 SS4A cycle includes $687,809,874 available for project Implementation Grants. The US DOT anticipates 40 to 70 awards, ranging from $2.5 Million to $25 Million each. The grant pays 80 percent of the total project cost, while local agencies are required to provide a 20 percent local match. TJKM Transportation Consultants aided City staff in developing the PTSAP, and the application package for the SS4A Implementation Grant.

During the PTSAP development, the Santa Rita Road Safety Project was identified as a highly competitive grant project. The Santa Rita Road Safety Project was presented to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Committee (BPTC) on April 27 to request support for the use of Measure BB funds towards the local match for the project. The BPTC recommends that the City Council authorize the application to the US DOT for the $25 million safety grant. The BPTC noted the limited amount of Measure BB funds the City receives and requested that Measure BB funds be used sparingly, but agreed that, if no other funding option is available, supports a maximum contribution of $1,300,000 in Measure BB Pedestrian/Bicycle funds to the project.

The Santa Rita Road Safety Project was presented to the PTSAP Stakeholder working group at its fourth meeting on April 30th, 2026, and any recommendations from this working group will be incorporated into the grant application.

The details of the Santa Rita Road Safety Project are shown in Attachment 1 and include safety enhancements at signalized intersections for all roadway users, including eliminating slip lanes, reducing pedestrian crossing distances, improving sight distance and visibility, and improving bicycle crossing treatments. There are also proposed improvements along the entire corridor to upgrade bicycle infrastructure, including converting existing bike lanes to elevated cycle tracks and constructing new cycle tracks.

These improvements are expected to help the City reach its goal of reducing fatal and severe accidents along the Santa Rita Road corridor, which experiences some of the highest numbers of injury collisions in the CIty's roadway network, as outlined in the Pleasanton Transportation Safety Action Plan.

EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Implementation of the grant, if the City's application is successful, advances Climate Action Plan (CAP 2.0) Strategy TLU-2 E5. Complete Streets Program and the PTSAP. The project and the PTSAP prioritize and take into account safety improvements that will benefit youth, seniors, pedestrians and cyclists as well as motorists. Having a convenient, safe, and comfortable multimodal transportation network is critical to supporting users of all ages and abilities, improving transportation options, and benefiting the environment.

OUTREACH
The Santa Rita Road Safety Project was presented to the PTSAP stakeholders meeting on April 21, 2026, the BPTC on April 21, 2026, and at a community meeting on May 7, 2026. As described in the separate Agenda Item for adoption of the PTSAP, extensive community and stakeholder engagement was conducted as part of that process, providing numerous opportunities for input on the priorities and scope of recommended safety improvements.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this action advances the Citywide strategic goal of Funding Our Future to “identify expanded and new revenue sources to address significant infrastructure needs” as well as Investing in Our Environment, to “continue to invest in parks, bicycle, and pedestrian infrastructure, and public art.” This action will allow the opportunity for the City to secure significant new grant funding in support of a planned capital improvement project.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact due to this action. Should the City be selected for a grant award, staff will return to the City Council to obtain authorization to accept the funding and approve the funding agreement. At that time, staff would also bring a request for authorization for any necessary budget actions, including the appropriation of funds for the local match and amendments to the revenue and expenditure budgets to account for the new funding.

The SS4A grant requires a 20 percent local match; if the City is awarded the full $25 million, a local match of $5,000,000 will be required. A combination of Traffic Impact Fee Funds ($3,700,000) and Measure BB funds ($1,300,000) is available for the local match. The US DOT anticipates announcing grant awards in October 2026 and executing funding agreements within 12 months of announcement. It is possible that a different combination of funds may be used when executing a funding agreement (estimated to occur in October 2027). These elements will be brought to the Council at a future meeting following a notice of award.

Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:

Cedric Novenario, Senior
Transportation Engineer
Ellen Clark, Director of Community and
Economic Development
Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:

1. Proposed Safety Projects - Santa Rita Road

Corridor / Location Phase 1 Phase 2
Overall Corridor Improvement Retroreflective backplate - all signalized locations Speed Feedback Signs - at strategic locations
Red Light Photo Enforcement at key intersections
Speed Cameras at key intersections (when allowed).

Santa Rita Road – North City Limits to Rosewood Drive Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval and add left turn phases at key intersections
Santa Rita Road - Rosewood Drive to Stoneridge Drive Extend sidewalks to include 5' bike lanes and make intersections along the segment Protected bike
intersection, include full signal upgrades to meet latest standards
Santa Rita Road – Stoneridge Drive to Mohr Avenue Upgrade from Class 2 buffer bike lane to Class 4 separated by reducing the travel lane. Buffer can be
concrete.

Extend sidewalks to include 5' bike lanes and make
intersections along the segment, Protected bike
Intersection, include full signal upgrades to meet latest standards
Santa Rita Road – Mohr Avenue to Valley Avenue Upgrade from Class 2 buffer bike lane to Class 4 separated by reducing the travel lane. Buffer can be
concrete.

Extend sidewalks to include 5' bike lanes and make
intersections along the segment Protected bike
Intersection, include full signal upgrades to meet latest standards
Santa Rita Road – Valley Avenue to Black Avenue Upgrade from Class 2 buffer bike lane to Class 4 separated by reducing the travel lane. Buffer can be
concrete.

Elevated Cycle Track with improved sight distances for
added safety
Francisco to Black Improvements:
• Keep Parking SB between Francisco to Black Avenue,
guide bikes to the sidewalk path for Amador Valley
Community Park and widen that walkway for better
bike/pedestrian shared use path.

Santa Rita Road & Francisco:
• Enhance intersection for added bike safety to cross
Santa Rita Road
Santa Rita at Valley Avenue Intersection safety improvements by the Developer project on the east side of the intersection
Improve the west side of intersections to enhance overall bike/ped safety at the intersection
Santa Rita Road - Black Avenue to Stanley Raised Cycle track southbound direction (convert the bike lane to raised in the area) - existing bus stop in front of Post Office to be floating bus stop in travel lane
Downtown Corridor - Ray St to Old Bernal Ave Parallel bike facility (cycle track) that diverts on St. John St to Peters Avenue
Proposed Safety Projects - Santa Rita Road
ATTACHMENT 1

Item #5

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
May 19, 2026
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WOOD ROGERS, INC., FOR THE I-580

OVERCROSSING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, CIP NO. 22570, FOR A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $482,940

SUMMARY
The I-580 Overcrossing Improvement Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Project (CIP No. 22570) will address pedestrian and bicycle improvements at three I-580 overcrossings: Santa Rita Road, Hacienda Drive, and Hopyard Road. These improvements include continuous bikeways, sidewalk widening, new crosswalk locations, and high-visibility crosswalks, including rectangular rapid flashing beacons and new signalized crossings. The agreement will be for an amount not to exceed $482,940, including a 20 percent contingency to account for the uncertainty associated with the Caltrans review process.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Design Professional Services Agreement (Attachment 1) with Wood Rogers, Inc., in the amount of $482,940, which includes a 20 percent contingency.

BACKGROUND
The I-580 Overcrossing Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements project is ranked third in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan's priorities and was created in 2022 to address the Bicycle Friendly Community silver status application (and its subsequent denial). The denial of silver status was due in part to the lack of convenient pedestrian and bicycle connections over I-580.

The project is within Caltrans's right-of-way, and although the roadway portion of the overcrossings (asphalt, signs, traffic signals, pavement striping, sidewalk, and lighting) is maintained by the City, any modifications to the design must be reviewed and approved by Caltrans. In 2023, Caltrans announced that it was reviewing and updating its design policies for pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure to allow more recent design standards to be approved without going through Caltrans design exception documentation. In hopes of a faster and less expensive Caltrans review process, staff elected to pause the project until the design standards were finalized.

In 2024, Caltrans completed the design standard update; however, the changes excluded freeway overcrossings. This exclusion eliminated the option of a streamlined, low-cost Caltrans approval process for the project.

The conceptual designs are shown in Attachment 3 and include relocated pedestrian and bicyclist crossing locations, rectangular rapid flashing beacons and/or pedestrian hybrid beacons at each crossing, high-visibility pavement markings, and protected bike lanes.

Installation of these pedestrian and bicycle enhancements is allowed by Caltrans as part of their Complete Streets design; however, the Complete Streets design may not be directly applicable to overcrossings, and as a result, design standard decision documentation will be required for several of the proposed elements, which requires additional Caltrans review and approval.

DISCUSSION
In light of the additional documentation and oversight required by Caltrans, staff applied for a competitive grant from the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) to complete the design work and Caltrans approval process. A $525,000 grant was awarded to the City to complete the overcrossing design. A request for proposals was issued on March 4, 2026, and closed on April 15, 2026. The City received three proposals, with Wood Rodgers Inc. ranked as the top consultant firm based on the proposal review criteria. They are identified as a local business by the Alameda CTC, with an office in Pleasanton, and have proposed a 12-month project timeline and a not-to-exceed amount of $402,450. (See Attachment 2) Wood Rodgers’s references have been checked, and the agency is in good standing, having completed similar projects in Oakland, West Sacramento, and Elk Grove.

Schedule
The proposal outlines a 12-month timeline to complete the final plan set and obtain Caltrans encroachment permit approval.

May 2026 to July 2026 Preliminary design
Aug 2026 to Nov 2026 65 percent design
Jan 2027 to Feb 2027 95 percent design
Nov 2026 to Apr 2027 Design Engineering Evaluation Report (DEER)/Caltrans Permit May 2027 Project complete and ready to advertise for construction bids

EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
The I-580 Overcrossing Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements project will benefit both Pleasanton's residents and businesses by improving access between the City of Pleasanton and the City of Dublin, providing equitable access for users of the roadway network. Improved pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure will reduce noise pollution and enable more active transportation, fostering a more sustainable quality of life.

OUTREACH
The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Committee (BPTC) reviewed this project and supports advancing it as a top three priority. The City of Dublin, Caltrans, and the Livermore / Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA), will have the opportunity to provide input on the project design. 65 percent plans will be shared with the BPTC for review and comment.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This project advances Goal C: Investing in Our Environment by finalizing the design of the capital improvement project and enabling improved mobility through alternative transportation, a priority item of the Climate Action Plan. This project also advances Goal E: Building a Community Where Everyone Belongs by providing improved access, mobility, and safety for all road users.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for this Agreement is available in the project budget (CIP 22570). The City was awarded a grant from Alameda CTC in the amount of $525,000 ($350,000 in Measure B Discretionary Bike/Ped and $175,000 in Measure BB Discretionary Bike/Ped) for the design of this project. The grant award requires a 25 percent match from the City of Pleasanton. The City will use the Measure BB Direct Local Distribution funds as the local match ($175,000).

This use of funds was included in the 2025 Capital Improvement Program.

Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:

Mike Tassano, Traffic
Engineer/Deputy Director of
Community and Econ Dev
Ellen Clark, Director of Community and
Economic Development
Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:

1. I-580 Overcrossing Conceptual Plans

2. Design Professional Services Agreement CIP 22570

3. Scope of Work

11' 4'
11'
11'
11'
6'
11'
11'
11' 4'
6'
10'
13'
11'
11'
11'
12'
12'
12' 4'
6'
5'
20'
6'
11'
11'
11'
11'
17'
11'
12'
11'
11'
6'
5'
12'
12'
Hopyard Road and I-580
Figure 1

CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED

DOUGHERTY ROAD HOPYARD ROAD
I-580

PEAK HOUR VOLUME
AM: 487
PM: 607
LEGEND

EXISTING CURBPROPOSED CURB

PROPOSED WHITE STRIPING GREEN BIKE PAINT
PROPOSED YELLOW STRIPING 42" CHANNELIZER

COORDINATE WITH CITY OF DUBLIN

FOR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THEIR

CITY OF LIMITS

LANES NARROW OUTSIDE OF

CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY

NEW CROSSWALK AND CURB RAMPS

RELOCATE FREEWAY ENTRANCE SIGN
FROMTO

RECTANGULAR RAPID-FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

WITH TRAIL OR BIKE WARNING SIGNS

NEW CROSSWALK AND CURB RAMPS

ADVANCED RRFB
$77$&+0(17

11'
4'
11'
11'
11'
11'
11'
3'3'
6'
6'
8' 11'
11'
11'

10.5'
7'

10.5'

10.5'
4'
5'

10.5' 3'
11'
11'
12'
12'
6'
12'
12'
12'
12'
12'
12' 5'
13'
4' 18'
8'
11'
11'
11'

10.5'
7'
12'
12'
5'

10.5'

11.5'

10.5' 10.5' 3'
Hacienda Drive and I-580
Figure 2

CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED

HACIENDA DRIVE
I-580

HACIENDA DRIVE OWENS DRIVE

BIKE RAMP

BIKE RAMP

PEAK HOUR VOLUME
AM: 412
PM: 696

PEAK HOUR VOLUME
AM: 156
PM: 458

PEAK HOUR VOLUME
AM: 205
PM: 675
LEGEND

EXISTING CURBPROPOSED CURB

PROPOSED WHITE STRIPING GREEN BIKE PAINT
PROPOSED YELLOW STRIPING 42" CHANNELIZER

COORDINATE WITH CITY OF DUBLIN

FOR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THEIR

CITY OF LIMITS

MAINTAIN EXISTING BIKE LANES

THROUGH INTERSECTION

UPGRADE CURB RAMPS

RELOCATE CROSSWALK AND CURB RAMPS

UPGRADE CURB RAMPS

RECTANGULAR RAPID-FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

WITH TRAIL OR BIKE WARNING SIGNS

ADVANCED RRFB

EXTEND CURB

ADVANCED RRFB

11'
11'
11'
3'
5'
11'
6'
12'12'12'
6'
3'
6'
12'
12'
9'
11'
5'
3'
12' 3'
5'
12'
12'
12'
12'12'
13'14'
4'
4'
7'
11'
11'
11' 3'
Santa Rita Road and I-580
Figure 3

CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED

TASSAJARA ROAD
I-580

NORTHSIDE DRIVE

SANTA RITA ROAD

PIMLICO DRIVE

INSTALL PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON

WITH PUSH BUTTON FOR BOTH

PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS REMOVE SECOND LANE TO INCREASE BUFFER SPACE

REQUIRES RELOCATION OF

STREET LIGHTS

PEAK HOUR VOLUME
AM: 868
PM: 557

PEAK HOUR VOLUME
AM: 138
PM: 331
LEGEND

EXISTING CURBPROPOSED CURB

PROPOSED WHITE STRIPING GREEN BIKE PAINT
PROPOSED YELLOW STRIPING 42" CHANNELIZER

RECONSTRUCT CURB RAMP UPGRADE CURB RAMPS

UPGRADE CURB RAMP

COORDINATE WITH CITY OF DUBLIN

FOR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THEIR

CITY OF LIMITS

RECTANGULAR RAPID-FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

WITH TRAIL OR BIKE WARNING SIGNS

ADVANCED RRFB

ATTACHMENT 2

DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR: I-580 OVERCROSSING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS CIP 22570
THIS DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into this day May 19, 2026, between the City of Pleasanton, a municipal corporation ("City"), and Wood Rodgers Inc. whose address is 3875 Hopyard Road, Suite 34, Pleasanton CA 94588 and telephone number is (925) 847-1556 ("Consultant").

RECITALS
A. Consultant is qualified and experienced in providing professional design services for the design and Caltrans permitting of bicycle and pedestrian improvements at freeway overcrossings for the purposes specified in this Agreement.

B. City finds it necessary and advisable to use the services of Consultant for the purposes provided in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions in this Agreement, City and Consultant agree as follows:

1. Consultant's Services. Consultant shall diligently perform the services described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, attached and incorporated to the extent consistent with this Agreement.

2. City Assistance. In order to assist Consultant in this work, City shall provide, if necessary, only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit A according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A.

3. Staff. Consultant shall assign David Melis to serve as the Project Manager, who may not be replaced without written consent of City.

4. Term. Time is of the essence. Consultant shall begin work on May 20, 2026. The work as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall be completed by December 31, 2027.

5. Compensation. For the services to be rendered, City shall pay Consultant as described more particularly in Exhibit B, which is attached and incorporated to the extent consistent with this Agreement. Payment shall be made on a monthly basis upon receipt and approval of Consultant's invoice. Total compensation for services and reimbursement for costs shall not exceed $402,450.37 unless the parties agree pursuant to Section 8, below. a. Invoices submitted to City must contain a brief description of work performed, percentage of work completed, percentage of Agreement time used, percentage of Agreement  Exhibits A & B
 Certificate(s) of Insurance
 Professional Liability Insurance
 W-9

amount expended and City reference number CIP 22570, Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant's invoice.
b. Upon completion of work and acceptance by City, Consultant shall have sixty (60) days in which to submit final invoicing for payment. An extension may be granted by City upon receiving a written request thirty (30) days in advance of said time limitation. The City shall have no obligation or liability to pay any invoice for work performed which the Consultant fails or neglects to submit within sixty (60) days, or any extension thereof granted by the City, after the work is accepted by the City.

6. Sufficiency of Consultant's Work.
a. Services shall be performed by Consultant in accordance with generally accepted high professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with a high level of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by members of Consultant’s profession currently practicing in California. By delivery of completed work, Consultant certifies that the work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and local laws and a high professional standard of care in California. b. Consultant is responsible for making an independent evaluation and judgment of all conditions affecting performance of the work, including without limitation site conditions, existing facilities, seismic, geologic, soils, hydrologic, geographic, climatic conditions, applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and all other contingencies or design considerations. Data, calculations, opinions, reports, investigations, and other similar information provided by the City relating to site, local, or other conditions is not warranted or guaranteed, either expressly or implied, by the City.
c. Consultant’s responsibilities under this section shall not be delegated. Consultant shall be responsible to the City for acts, errors, or omissions of Consultant’s subconsultants. d. Whenever the scope of work requires or permits review, approval, conditional approval or disapproval by the City, it is understood that such review, approval, conditional approval or disapproval is solely for the purposes of administering this Agreement and determining whether the Consultant is entitled to payment for such work, and not be construed as a waiver of any breach or acceptance by the City of any responsibility, professional or otherwise, for the work, and does not relieve the Consultant of responsibility for complying with the standard of performance or laws, regulations, industry standards, or from liability for damages caused by negligent acts, errors, omissions, noncompliance with high industry standards, or the willful misconduct of Consultant.

7. Ownership of Work. All reports, work data, plans, drawings, specifications, designs, photographs, images, works of authorship and all other documents completed or partially completed by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement (“materials”) shall become the property of City. Consultant agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this Agreement shall be vested in the City, and Consultant waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual property rights in favor of the City. All materials shall be delivered to the City upon completion or termination of the work under this Agreement.

If any materials are lost, damaged or destroyed before final delivery to the City, the Consultant

shall replace them at its own expense. Any and all copyrightable subject matter in all materials is hereby assigned to the City and the Consultant agrees to execute any additional documents that may be necessary to evidence such assignment. Consultant shall keep materials confidential and the materials shall not be used for purposes other than performance of services under this Agreement and shall not be disclosed to anyone not connected with these services, unless the City provides prior written consent.

8. Changes. City may request changes in the scope of services to be provided by Consultant.

Any changes and related fees shall be mutually agreed upon between the parties and subject to a written amendment to this Agreement. Changes resulting in up to 20 percent of the project budget may be approved by the City Manager. A cost-of-living adjustment in July 2027 shall be allowed without an amendment to this Agreement.

9. Consultant's Status. In performing the obligations set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall have the status of an independent contractor and Consultant shall not be considered to be an employee of the City for any purpose. All persons working for or under the direction of Consultant are its agents and employees and are not agents or employees of City.

10. Labor Code/Prevailing Wages. To the extent applicable, Consultant shall comply with the requirements of the California Labor Code including but not limited to hours of labor, nondiscrimination, payroll records, apprentices, workers' compensation and payment of prevailing wages as determined by Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall post, at each job site, a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages. Consultant shall forfeit fifty dollars ($50.00) for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any public work done under the Agreement by it or by any subconsultant.

11. Termination of Convenience of City. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time by mailing a notice in writing to Consultant. The Agreement shall then be deemed terminated, and no further work shall be performed by Consultant. If the Agreement is so terminated, the Consultant shall be paid for that percentage of the work actually completed at the time the notice of termination is received.

12. Non-Assignability. The Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any interest or obligation in the Agreement without the prior written consent of the City, and then only upon such terms and conditions as City may set forth in writing. Consultant shall be solely responsible for reimbursing subconsultants.

13. Indemnity and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law (including, without limitation, California Civil Code §§ 2782, 2782.6 and 2782.8), Consultant shall defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless, the City and its officers, agents and employees (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, loss, cost, damage, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Consultant or its Subconsultants), expense, and liability of every kind, nature and description (including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation) arising from, or alleged to have arisen from, pertain to, or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, the negligence, reckless, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, any Subconsultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, or anyone

that they control (collectively “Liabilities”) in the performance of its services under this Agreement, regardless of whether the City has reviewed or approved the work or services which has given rise to the claim, loss, cost, damage, injury or liability for damages. This indemnification shall extend for a reasonable period of time after completion of the project as well as during the period of actual performance of services under this Agreement. The City's acceptance of the insurance certificates required under this Agreement does not relieve the Consultant from its obligation under this paragraph. To the extent that there is an obligation to indemnify under this Section 13, Consultant shall be responsible for incidental and consequential damages resulting directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from Consultant’s negligence, reckless or willful misconduct.

Such obligations to defend, hold harmless and indemnify any Indemnitee shall not apply to the extent such Liabilities are caused by the sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnitee. Obligation to defend shall be proportionate as to Consultant’s percentage of fault as provided in California Civil Code § 2782.8.

14. Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect, at its own cost and expense, insurance coverages with insurers with an A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII. Contractor shall have the obligation to furnish City, as additional insured, the minimum coverages identified below, or such greater or broader coverage for City, if available in the Contractor’s policies:
a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CG 00 01, with limits of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 products and completed operations aggregate for bodily injury and property damage. The policy shall include a per project or per location general aggregate endorsement. If a per project/location endorsement is not available, the limit for the general aggregate shall be doubled. The policy shall provide that the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers are named as additional insureds using ISO form CG 20 10 (or equivalent) for ongoing operations, and, for construction or service agreements, ISO form CG 20 37 (or equivalent) for completed operations and satisfactory to the City Attorney. The policy shall allow and be endorsed primary insurance for work performed by Consultant and its subconsultants, and that no other insurance or self-insurance effected by City or other additional insured will be contribute to or be called on to cover a loss. b. Automobile Liability Insurance. Automobile liability insurance coverage for owned, nonowned, and hired autos using ISO Business Automobile Coverage form CA 00 01 (or equivalent) with limits not less than $2,000,000 each accident. If the Consultant’s business/company does not own any automobiles, coverage for hired and non-owned autos shall be provided. The policy shall provide and be endorsed that the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers are included or named as additional insureds. The policy shall provide and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. c. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance. Statutory Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be provided for all persons employed directly or indirectly by Contractor. The Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than

$1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 by disease-policy limit, and $1,000,000 by diseaseeach employee. The coverage shall provide and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. The requirement to maintain Statutory Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance may be waived by the City upon written verification that Contractor does not have any employees.
d. Professional Liability Insurance. Professional liability insurance that insures against professional errors and omissions that may be made in performing professional services in the amount of $2,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of the start of work, and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the work.
e. Certificate of Insurance and Endorsements. Consultant shall file a certificate of insurance and all required endorsements with the City prior to the City’s execution of this Agreement, and prior to engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Agreement.

The Certificate of Insurance shall provide in writing that the insurance afforded by this Certificate shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits without providing notice to the City in accordance with California Insurance Code section 677.2 which requires the notice of cancellation to: 1) include the effective date of the cancellation; 2) include the reasons for the cancellation; and 3) be given at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the cancellation, except that in the case of cancellation for nonpayment of premiums or for fraud, the notice shall be given no less than 10 days prior to the effective date of the cancellation. Notice shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. In addition, the insured shall provide thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City of any cancellation, suspension, reduction of coverage or in limits, or voiding of the insurance coverage required by this agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete certified copies of policies.
f. Defense Costs. Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf of” basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusions. These provisions do not apply to Professional Liability. g. Adequacy of Coverage. City reserves the right to modify these insurance requirements/coverages based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, or other special circumstances.
h. Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated in this Agreement, including but not limited naming additional insureds.

15. Notices. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

To Consultant: _____________________ To City: City Manager _____________________ City of Pleasanton
_____________________ 123 Main Street, P.O. Box 520

_____________________ Pleasanton, CA 94566

16. Conformance to Applicable Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Municipal laws, rules, and ordinances. Consultant shall not discriminate in the employment of persons or in the provision of services under this Agreement on the basis of any legally protected classification, including race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or religion of such person.

17. Licenses, Certifications, Copyrights and Permits. Prior to the City's execution of this Agreement and prior to the Consultant's engaging in any operation or activity set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a City of Pleasanton business license, which must be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement. Consultant represents that its work will not unlawfully infringe any other copyrighted work. Consultant covenants that it has obtained all certificates, licenses, permits and the like required to perform the services under this Agreement.

18. Records and Audits. Consultant shall maintain all records regarding this Agreement and the services performed for a period of three years from the date that final payment is made. At any time during normal business hours, the records shall be made available to the City to inspect and audit.

19. Confidentiality. Consultant shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of City reports, information or conclusions.

20. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant covenants that other than this Agreement, Consultant has no financial interest with any official, employee or other representative of the City. Consultant and its principals do not have any financial interest in real property, sources of income or investment that would be affected in any manner by the performance of Consultant’s services under this Agreement. If such an interest occurs, Consultant will immediately notify the City.

21. Campaign Contribution Disclosure. Consultant has complied with the campaign contribution disclosure provisions of the California Levine Act (Govt. Code § 84308) and has completed the Levine Act Disclosure Statement attached hereto as Exhibit C.

21. Waiver. In the event either City or Consultant at any time waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this Agreement, whether of the same or of any other covenant, condition or obligation.

22. Governing Law. California law shall govern any legal action pursuant to this Agreement with venue in the applicable court or forum for Alameda County.

23. Attorney's Fees. The prevailing party in any action brought to enforce or construe the terms of this Agreement may recover from the other party its reasonable costs and attorney's fees expended in connection with such an action.

24. No Personal Liability. No official or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount due Consultant.

25. Counterparts and Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement. Counterparts may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including pdf or any electronic signature complying with U.S. federal E-Sign Act of 2000 (15 U.S. Code §7001 et seq.), California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Cal. Civil Code §1633.1 et seq.), or other applicable law) or other transmission method, and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.

26. Scope of Agreement. This writing constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties.

Any modification to the Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties.

27. Alameda CTC Local Business Contract Equity Program. This contract will be funded in whole or in part by Alameda CTC VRF, Measure B and/or Measure BB funds, or such funds in combination with other local funds. Consequently, Alameda CTC’s Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) Program will apply. The LBCE Program establishes goals for the award of professional service contracts to firms located within Alameda County. a. CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable provisions of Alameda County Transportation Commission’s (ALAMEDA CTC’s) Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) Program, incorporated herein by reference as if attached hereto. The City shall provide a copy of the LBCE PROGRAM to CONSULTANT upon request. b. If the CONSULTANT or any subconsultant is a Local Business Enterprise (“LBE”), Small Local Business Enterprise (“SLBE”), and/or Very Small Local Business Enterprise (“VSLBE”) firm, the certificate for that firm shall be attached to this AGREEMENT. c. No substitution of a listed LBE, SLBE, or VSLBE subconsultant on a contract can be made without the prior written approval of the City with agreement of ALAMEDA CTC, or by the City with written consent from ALAMEDA CTC. If an LBE, SLBE, or VSLBE subconsultant is unable to perform successfully, the City or CONSULTANT shall submit a written request to ALAMEDA CTC for approval to replace such subconsultant.

CONSULTANT must make good faith efforts to replace such LBE, SLBE, or VSLBE with another firm that shall count toward the same participation (e.g., an LBE firm may be substituted by an LBE, SLBE or VSLBE). ALAMEDA CTC may investigate the circumstances surrounding the substitution request.
d. CONSULTANT shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of submitting a valid and complete invoice with all required supporting documentation. Accompanying the request for payment, a CONSULTANT will submit a Payment Request Form summarizing payments due. When paying CONSULTANT, the City will include a Payment Request Form that reflects all approved items. CONSULTANT shall include an exact copy of this Payment Request Form with each payment to subconsultants. e. CONSULTANT agrees to include any subconsultant’s acceptable invoices with each Payment Request Form that it submits to the City no later than thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of such invoice from the subconsultant.

THIS AGREEMENT is executed the date first above written.

CITY OF PLEASANTON CONSULTANT

_____________________________ By: __________________________ Gerry Beaudin, City Manager Signature
__________________________
Print name
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk Title: __________________________ Approved as to form:
_____________________________ By: __________________________ Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney Signature
__________________________
Print name
Title: __________________________
[If Consultant is a corporation, signatures must comply with California Corporations Code §313] Rev. 11/23

EXHIBIT C

LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
California Government Code § 84308, commonly referred to as the “Levine Act,” prohibits any officer of a local government agency from participating in the consideration or action related to a proceeding, including the award of a contract, if he or she receives political contribution(s) totaling more than $500 within the preceding 12 months while the proceeding is pending, and for 12 months following the date of the final decision in a proceeding or award of a contract. This prohibition applies when an officer accepts, solicits, or directs contributions on the officer’s own behalf, on behalf of another officer, on behalf of any candidate for office, or on behalf of any committee.

A list of the members of the City Council can be located at: https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/ourgovernment/mayor-city-council/

1. Have you or your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $500 to any City officer in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposals or the anticipated date of any Council action related to this contract? □ YES □ NO
If YES, please identify the person(s) or agent(s) making the contribution:
____________________________________________________________ If YES, please identify the officer receiving the contribution:
____________________________________________________________

2. Do you, or your company, or any agent on behalf of you or you company, anticipate or plan to make any political contributions of more than $500 to any City officer in the 12 months following any Council action related to this contract?
□ YES □ NO
If YES, please identify the person(s) or agent(s) making the contribution:
____________________________________________________________ If YES, please identify the officer receiving the contribution:
____________________________________________________________ Answering YES does not preclude the City of Pleasanton from awarding a contract or taking subsequent action related to the item. It does, however, preclude the identified City officer from participating in any actions related to such an item.

By signing below, you certify you also agree to disclose to the City any future contributions made to a City officer by you or your agent(s) after the date of signing this disclosure form, and within 12 months following the approval, renewal, or extension of the requested contract.

I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

Signed: __________________________ Date: ________________ Print Name: __________________________ Title: ________________ Company: __________________________

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 13

WORK PLAN/SCOPE OF WORK
Project Understanding
The I-580 Overcrossings Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan is a high priority project in the City’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, which will provide protected bike lanes, improved sidewalks, and more visible crosswalks through the interchanges at Hopyard Road, Hacienda Drive, and Santa Rita Road.

The goal of work to be performed with this Proposal is to provide the City with a design that has gained Caltrans’ approval and deliver final construction documents that are ready to advertise and bid. The conceptual plans that have been prepared will be used as the basis for the final design and will be submitted to Caltrans, along with a Design Engineering Evaluation Report (DEER), for project approval.

The key to maintaining the project schedule will be delivering a complete DEER submittal to Caltrans as early as possible that includes a design that minimizes non-standard features, which will require review and approval of a Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD). Unfortunately, overcrossings and interchanges are generally excluded from the design standards found in Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 94 for Complete Streets, so the design will be required to follow the requirements of DIB 82- 06 and the lane and shoulder widths of the Highway Design Manual.

The DEER and DSDD for any non-standard features will be submitted to Caltrans no later than the development of the project plans for the 65% submittal, but we will engage Caltrans much earlier to present the design concepts and gain an understanding of what their expectations and key concerns are for project approval.

Wood Rodgers assumes that these projects will qualify for a Categorical Exemption for CEQA under 15301(c) Existing Facilities.

The City, in coordination with Caltrans, will file a Notice of Exemption form for CEQA compliance. Since no federal funds have been programmed to the project, no NEPA review is expected to be needed. Wood Rodgers anticipates that only a traffic analysis would be required and no other environmental technical studies should be needed to support the CEQA exemption.

The Notice of Exemption form should be included as an attachment to the DEER.

Scope of Work
TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Maintaining the schedule and ensuring Caltrans’ approval for the project will require a proactive project
management plan that are addressed in our work plan.

Task 1.1 – Project Management
The Wood Rodgers Project Manager will coordinate all
Consultant operations with the City, including but not
limited to, tracking progress of the scope of work and
administering subcontracts. Wood Rodgers shall provide
overall project management, coordination, and
supervision of project status to facilitate the performance of the work in accordance with standards and
requirements of the City and other applicable standards and requirements. Consultant Project Manager shall
prepare and submit monthly project progress reports to
the City’s Project Manager. This scope assumes project
management will be required over a twelve (12) month
schedule.

Task 1.2 – CoordinaƟon and MeeƟngs
The Project Manager shall conduct the project kick-off
meetings, hold regular meetings with City, and shall
conduct meetings and coordination with other
stakeholders, City, and other agencies, in monthly Project Development Team (PDT) meetings or technical
workshops and focused meetings as necessary. Wood
Rodgers will prepare agendas and meeting minutes,
Communication and distribution of project records and
information, and responses to all internal requests for information about the project. This task includes four (4) stakeholder meetings with Caltrans as needed to discuss their concerns and the review and approval of the DEER.

Task 1.3 – Project AdministraƟon
Wood Rodgers will prepare and update the Project
schedule monthly or as needed. The project schedule
shall be logical, complete, and shall consider City peer reviews. Wood Rodgers will provide weekly email updates reporting on the project status, including, but not limited to, project schedule including planned and actual target dates, contract budget, general progress on project tasks, and project issues and concerns. and procedures.

Task 1 Deliverables:
• Project Schedule / Progress Reports (Updated
Monthly – 12 Months)
• Weekly status reports via email
• Monthly Meeting Agendas and Notes
• Caltrans Meeting Agendas and Notes

EXHIBIT A

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 14 TASK 2 – PROJECT INITIATION
Task 2.1 – Preliminary InvesƟgaƟon, Research,
and Site Visit
Wood Rodgers will obtain existing as-built plans and right of way record maps from the City of Pleasanton and
Caltrans, and facility mapping from utility providers within the project area. Following the kick-off meeting, a field review will be scheduled with the City to visit the sites and identify any potential issues or concerns.

Task 2.2 – Topographic Survey
Wood Rodgers will perform a topographic survey for the
project site. One (1) Foot Contour intervals will be
generated from aerial photographs. Existing conditions
and 2D planimetric features shall be located and will
include but not be limited to fences, roads, curbs,
driveways, paths, buildings, walls, etc. Surface utilities (sanitary sewer, storm drain, water, gas, power and
communications) features and structures, visible from air shall be located and shown on the mapping. The utility
type will be confirmed on the ground and with as-built
plans which is included in Task 2.3. Project accuracy will conform to general accepted photogrammetric standards
established by the USGS National Map Accuracy
Standards. The horizontal and vertical control shall be based on the California State Plane Zone III coordinates and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD
88). (Includes aerial orthorectified color photo - digital copy)
Features not measured in the Aerial Topographic Survey
and needed for design will be measured from the ground
with conventional methods. Utilities, features under tree canopies, street cross-sections and other details for design will be captured with this item. We will also measure the pipe inverts of utilities at manholes and catch basins. This item assumes 2 days of a 2-person crew in the field
collecting data and office time for processing the data.

Project AssumpƟons

1. No boundary surveys or Right of Way acquisition is
included in this proposal. It is assumed that the
improvements will all be on the overcrossings and
the existing right-of-way is sufficient.

2. The topographic survey will primarily include the
top of overcrossings. Spot grades can be generated
on the lower freeway and ground but the
topographic surface will be on the top of the
overcrossings. Utilities and other improvements will
also only be mapped on the top of the
overcrossings.

Task 2.3 – UƟlity ConŇict IdenƟĮcaƟon and
PosiƟve LocaƟon
Wood Rodgers will send utility mapping requests (Utility ‘A’ Letters) to known utility owners in the project area.

Wood Rodgers will use a combination of record
information provided, GIS data, and as-built information to develop a utility base map. It is recommended that
veriĮcation of underground utilities be completed during the design phase. We have included an estimated direct
cost budget for potholing. However, the exact amount
may change based on the Įnal design plans.

Task 2 Deliverables:
• Topographic Survey
• Utility Base Map
• Utility Conflict Mapping
TASK 3 – COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
For this project, Team 360 will serve as the community
engagement and public communications lead, bringing
proven outreach systems, trusted community
relationships, and the consensus-building and
communication skills needed to keep diverse stakeholders informed and engaged throughout a complex, multiphase project. Our in-house media production capabilities further support this work - allowing us to develop clear, accessible materials that help the public understand and connect with infrastructure improvements at every stage.

Our approach emphasizes clarity, accessibility, and
accountability - ensuring that the City of Pleasanton,
Caltrans, corridor stakeholders, and the broader public remain aligned and conĮdent throughout design,
permitting, and construction advertisement.

As the community engagement and communications
subconsultant, we will lead all outreach and public
communications activities in support of Wood Rodgers
and the City of Pleasanton. Building on our active work on corridor improvement projects across Alameda County –
including projects requiring Caltrans District 4 permitting - Team 360 brings trusted regional relationships and a deep understanding of what it takes to keep communities
informed and engaged throughout a complex, multiphase design and permitting process.

Our approach to this project is grounded in the
understanding that bicycle and pedestrian improvements
at high-trafĮc freeway overcrossings affect a wide range of users, including cyclists, pedestrians, adjacent businesses, disability and accessibility advocates, and the broader traveling public. Effective engagement means meeting

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 15 those stakeholders where they are and communicating
clearly about design decisions and their real-world
impacts. We are experienced in building the public
conĮdence needed to carry a project through design,
permitting, and into construction. Team 360 is committed to delivering that engagement in a way that is transparent, and reŇective of the Pleasanton community's priorities.

Task 3.1 – Engagement Planning and Project
CoordinaƟon
We will begin the project with a structured kickoff process that aligns the full project team - including Wood Rodgers and the City of Pleasanton - on objectives, timelines, roles, and communication protocols. Following our initial
roadmapping, Team 360 will develop a comprehensive
Community Engagement Plan that deĮnes outreach goals,
target audiences, methods, and deliverables organized
around the project's major design milestones.

We will develop and maintain a stakeholder list
encompassing businesses, residents, neighborhood
organizations, disability advocates, cycling and pedestrian groups, and other corridor stakeholders within the project area. Our practice is to treat the stakeholder list as a living document, updated throughout the project as design
advances and new contacts are identiĮed.

Throughout the design phase, we will maintain a steady
coordination rhythm with Wood Rodgers and the City,
participating in project team meetings, preparing meeting documentation, and tracking action items and
commitments to ensure nothing falls through the cracks.

Team 360 also brings direct expertise working in the
Alameda County Region for 20 years and understanding
of Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) program
requirements - having development and managed local
compliance programs throughout Alameda County - and
will coordinate with Wood Rodgers to ensure all
compliance documentation and work distribution tracking are well-organized from project initiation.

Task 3.1 Deliverables:
• Community Engagement Plan (draft and Įnal)
• Stakeholder list(s); kickoff meeting summary
• Meeting minutes and coordination documentation
• LBCE work distribution documentation support.

Task 3.2 – Community Outreach and Public
MeeƟngs
We will participate in the project site visit alongside the project team, using that opportunity to develop a
Įrsthand understanding of the three overcrossing
locations at Santa Rita Road, Hacienda Drive, and Hopyard Road and identify the businesses, neighborhoods,
organizations and residents in the immediate vicinity that will be priority audiences for outreach. We recognize that each of the three corridors may present a distinct
engagement proĮle, and we will tailor our stakeholder
identiĮcation and outreach approach accordingly.

As design advances, We will organize and facilitate public outreach activities throughout each design milestone,
ensuring that the Pleasanton community has meaningful
opportunities to learn about the project, ask questions, and provide input that informs design decisions. We will organize and facilitate community workshops and open
house events, coordinating all logistics including venue, materials, accessibility accommodations, and stafĮng.

Our extensive experience conducting public meetings for the OakDOT streetscape projects includes successfully
facilitating community forums, corridor open houses,
interactive design feedback sessions and even door-todoor visits with corridor businesses. we will bring that same intentional, hands-on approach to Pleasanton. We
will also conduct targeted outreach to businesses and
organizations adjacent to the three overcrossing locations, ensuring that stakeholders who may not attend formal
meetings still receive timely, accurate information about the project.

All public engagement activities will be documented
through meeting summaries, attendance records, and
feedback reports that capture community input in a
format useful to the design team.

Task 3.2 Deliverables:
• Community workshops / open house events
• Business and stakeholder outreach
• Meeting summaries and feedback reports
• Attendance documentation
TASK 3.3 – PROJECT COMMUNICATIONS

AND PUBLIC INFORMATION MATERIALS
We will develop and manage all public-facing
communications materials throughout the design and
permitting process. Our in-house communications and
media production team will produce a full suite of project materials designed to explain complex design
improvements in clear, accessible terms for a general
audience.

Materials will include project fact sheets and one-pagers, construction and project update notices, digital content for the project website and social media channels, and
presentation materials for public meetings and

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 16 stakeholder brieĮngs. As the project moves toward the
Caltrans permitting phase and eventual construction
advertisement, Team 360 will develop pre-construction
community notiĮcations, including mailers, door hangers, and business toolkits, that communicate timing, access
changes, and project phasing clearly and in advance.

We have a proven track record producing project
explainer videos and visual animations for OakDOT
corridor improvement projects, including the Broadway
and Embarcadero West streetscape improvements —
work that translated complex design plans into clear,
community-facing visuals that helped the public
understand what changes to expect and how
improvements would beneĮt them. For the I-580
overcrossing improvements, where bridge design changes
may be difĮcult for the public to visualize from plans
alone, this type of visual storytelling can be a powerful tool for building community understanding and support.

We will coordinate with Wood Rodgers on the
development of all visual content to ensure accuracy and alignment with the design at each submittal stage.

Task 3.3 Deliverables:
• Project fact sheets and update notices;
• Digital content (web, social media);
• Pre-construction community notiĮcations; project
explainer video / visual
• animation (as directed);
• Presentation materials for public meetings.

Task 3.4 – DocumentaƟon, ReporƟng, and
Quality Assurance
We will maintain organized records of all engagement
activities, including outreach logs, meeting
documentation, stakeholder correspondence, and
feedback summaries. We will provide the project team
with regular progress updates and prepare engagement
summary reports at key project milestones.

All public-facing materials will go through an internal QA/QC review process before distribution to ensure
accuracy, clarity, and consistency with the project's design status and messaging. We will coordinate closely with
Wood Rodgers throughout to ensure that engagement
activities and communications remain aligned with the
design and permitting schedule.

Task 3.4 Deliverables:
• Outreach logs and activity tracking;
• Milestone engagement reports;
• QA/QC review of all public-facing materials.

TASK 4 – PROJECT DESIGN
Following the development of base mapping from the
topographic survey, right of way base map, and utility
base map, Wood Rodgers will prepare detailed designs for each interchange that builds upon the conceptual design, updating the design to reflect any issues identified with the field walk, initial discussions with the City and
Caltrans, and updated design criteria since the project was paused.

Task 4.1 – Traĸc and Collision Analysis
Wood Rodgers will prepare a Traffic and Collision Analysis summarizing the current and forecasted traffic volumes, as well as the history of collisions within the project area.

This analysis will focus on how the proposed project will affect operations on I-580 with the modifications of the on- and off-ramps of the three interchanges. The collision analysis will provide a summary of collision history,
identify primary causes of the collisions, and how the
project will affect each type of collision.

Task 4.2 – Storm Water Data Report (Short
Form)
Wood Rodgers will prepare a short form Storm Water
Data Report (SWDR) to include with the Caltrans DEER.

The SWDR will address permanent and temporary water
pollution control measures to comply with the State’s
NPDES general construction permit
Task 4.3 – TransportaƟon Management Plan
Wood Rodgers will prepare a Transportation Management
Plan (TMP) for the project consistent with Caltrans
Transportation Management Plan Guidelines (dated
November 2015). The TMP will consist of sections
addressing some or all the following strategies at a plan level: roles and responsibilities, public information,
motorist information, incident management, construction strategies (e.g., lane closure charts), demand
management, alternative routes (or detours), and
continency plans. Wood Rodgers will coordinate with
Caltrans Traffic Operations on preparation and review of the TMP. Wood Rodgers will prepare materials required
for a major lane closure request for the ramps and any
needed lane closures within Caltrans right of way. Recent data will be obtained from the Caltrans Traffic Census
Program website, the Performance Measurement System
(PeMS) website, or via a request to Caltrans Traffic
Operations staff. It is assumed that Wood Rodgers will not collect new data for the TMP, and all data will be obtained from Caltrans.

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 17 Task 4.4 – 65% Plans & EsƟmate
Wood Rodgers will advance the design of the bike and
pedestrian improvements shown on the conceptual plans
and develop 65% project plans and construction cost
estimates for each location.

Preparation of the project plans will be consistent with the City of Pleasanton and Caltrans Standards. Wood Rodgers will perform an internal QA/QC review of the plans prior to submittal to the City.

The project plans will include electrical plans for the installation of the Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons and Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon shown on the concept plans, as well as the relocation of the street lights.

The anticipated number of plan sheets to be prepared for the improvements are listed in the table below:

SHEET TITLE SCALE COUNT
Title Sheet N/A 1
Typical Cross SecƟons N/A 3
Key Map / Control Sheet 1”=100’ 1
Plan and ProĮle 1”=50’ 6
ConstrucƟon Details 1”=10’ 12
UƟlity Plan 1”=50’ 6
Stage ConstrucƟon/Detour Plans 1”=100’ 3
Signing and Pavement DelineaƟon 1”=50’ 6
Electrical Plans 1”=50’ 12
TOTAL 50
Task 4.5 – 95% Plans, SpeciĮcaƟons & EsƟmate
Following the City review of the 65% submittal, we will update the project plans and estimate and prepare
responses to each comment received. Along with the
updated plans and estimate, we will assemble and edit
the Caltrans Standard Special Provisions for the bid items.

Task 4.6 – Final Plans, SpeciĮcaƟons & EsƟmate
Following the City review of the 95% submittal, we will update the project plans, Special Provisions, and cost
estimate for the Final submittal. We will prepare
responses to each comment received.

Task 4 Deliverables
• Traffic Operations Analysis Report
• Storm Water Data Report (Short Form)
• Transportation Management Plan
• 65% P&E, 95% PS&E, Final PS&E (PDF)
• Pending Resident Engineer File
• Supplemental PS&E Materials
• QA/QC Plan Check and Review Documents at Each
Submittal
TASK 5 – DESIGN ENGINEERING

EVALUATION REPORT
The Design Engineering Evaluation Report (DEER) will be prepared in accordance with the Guidelines provided in
Appendix I of Caltrans’ Project Development Procedures
Manual. Wood Rodgers will serve as the primary contract to Caltrans in the preparation, review, and approval of the DEER
Task 5.1 – Prepare DEER
The key factors for a project to use the DEER as a project initiation and approval document are:
• The project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption for CEQA and Categorical Exclusion for NEPA, or the
project does not result in an increase in Vehicle
Miles Traveled if a higher level of environmental
document is required.
• The project has a single-build alternative
• No CTC action is required
• No FHWA approval is needed due to a change in
access control or right of way relinquishment
• No bridge widening or new structures that are not
constructed per Caltrans’ Standard Plans are
proposed
The supporting documentation that is required to be
submitted with the DEER includes:
• Right of Way Data Sheet for utility conflicts, any
acquisitions, or temporary construction easements
(no acquisitions or TCE’s are anticipated)
• Quality Management Plan describing quality
control and assurance activities
• Design Standard Decision Document to document
the justification for any nonstandard design
features
• Exhibits to supplement the findings of the DEER,
such as the location map, layout plans and typical
cross sections.
• An approved CEQA/NEPA document
• Traffic and Collision Analysis summarizing the
current and forecasted traffic volumes, as well as
the history of collisions within the project area
• A maintenance agreement and any other permits
Wood Rodgers has extensive experience in the
preparation of Project Initiation and Project Approval
documents for local agencies working with Caltrans, most recently having prepared a DEER for a Class I shared-use

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 18 path within the State Route 49 corridor within the City of Sonora for the Tuolumne County Transportation Council.

Task 5.2 – Maintenance Agreement Support
Wood Rodgers will facilitate the development of a
Maintenance Agreement between the City and Caltrans
which will provide a clear understanding of what
elements will be maintained by the City and what
elements Caltrans would be responsible for. This
discussion will take place during the early stages of the project design in conjunction with the development of the DEER.

TASK 6 – BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION

SUPPORT
Following the completion of the project plans, Wood
Rodgers will submit the Resident Engineer Pending File
and any supplemental information needed for the bid
documents.

Task 6.1 – Bidding Support
Wood Rodgers will respond to Request for Information
(RFI) during the bid period and prepare revisions if needed for an addendum.

Task 6.2 – ConstrucƟon Support
Wood Rodgers will attend a construction kick-off meeting after contract award. We will review any proposed
Contract Change Orders and respond as needed. We will
prepare As-built Record Drawings following the
completion of construction from the Resident Engineer’s markups of any design changes.

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 19

SCHEDULE

COMPANY: Wood Rodgers, Inc.

PROJECT: City of Pleasanton - I-580 Overcrossings Bike and Ped Improvements Principal
Engineer I
Senior
Engineer II
Senior
Engineer I
Project
Engineer II
Project
Engineer I Engineer II Engineer I Designer
Sr. CAD Tech /
Graphics
Designer II
Principal
Surveyor I
Senior
Surveyor II
Project
Surveyor I Surveyor II
2-Person
Survey
Crew
Project
Coordinator
$ 345.00 $ 325.00 $ 315.00 $ 290.00 $ 275.00 $ 265.00 $ 255.00 $ 120.00 $ 240.00 $ 345.00 $ 325.00 $ 275.00 $ 265.00 $ 405.00 $ 196.10 TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 81 12 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 121 $ 39,344.77 $ - $ 39,344.77 $ - $ - $ - $ 39,344.77

1.1 Project Management 20 20 $ 7,038.00 $ - $ 7,038.00 $ - $ 7,038.00

1.2 Coordination & Meetings 40 12 8 12 72 $ 23,700.00 $ - $ 23,700.00 $ - $ 23,700.00

1.3 Project Administration 20 8 28 $ 8,606.77 $ - $ 8,606.77 $ - $ 8,606.77 TASK 2 PROJECT INITIATION 2 8 0 0 24 0 76 0 0 2 8 12 16 26 0 174 $ 50,528.00 $ 26,300.00 $ 76,828.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 76,828.00

2.1 Preliminary Investigation, Research and Site Visit 2 4 8 16 30 $ 8,168.00 $ - $ 8,168.00 $ - $ 8,168.00

2.2 Topographic Survey 2 8 12 16 26 64 $ 21,360.00 $ 12,800.00 $ 34,160.00 $ - $ 34,160.00

2.3 Utility Conflict Identification and Positive Location 4 16 60 80 $ 21,000.00 $ 13,500.00 $ 34,500.00 $ - $ 34,500.00 TASK 3 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PUBLIC COMMUNICATION 8 4 16 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 $ 14,200.00 $ - $ 14,200.00 $ 120,550.10 $ - $ 120,550.10 $ 134,750.10

3.1 Engagement Planning and Project Coordination 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 28,153.55 $ - $ 28,153.55 $ 28,153.55

3.2 Community Outreach and Public Meetings 8 4 16 20 48 $ 14,200.00 $ - $ 14,200.00 $ 41,380.05 $ - $ 41,380.05 $ 55,580.05

3.3 Project Communications and Public Information Materials 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,232.00 $ - $ 30,232.00 $ 30,232.00

3.4 Documentation, Reporting, and Quality Assurance 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 20,784.50 $ - $ 20,784.50 $ 20,784.50 TASK 4 PROJECT DESIGN 22 40 28 44 42 76 80 104 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 480 $ 117,127.50 $ - $ 117,127.50 $ - $ - $ - $ 117,127.50

4.1 Traffic and Collision Analysis 4 8 40 52 $ 15,500.00 $ - $ 15,500.00 $ 15,500.00

4.2 Storm Water Data Report (Short Form) 2 4 16 22 $ 6,090.00 $ - $ 6,090.00 $ 6,090.00

4.3 Transportation Management Plan 4 20 24 $ 7,600.00 $ - $ 7,600.00 $ 7,600.00

4.2 65% Plans and Estimate 8 16 24 36 40 48 20 192 $ 44,860.00 $ - $ 44,860.00 $ 44,860.00

4.3 95% Plans, Specifications and Estimate 6 12 12 16 24 32 16 118 $ 27,310.00 $ - $ 27,310.00 $ 27,310.00

4.4 Final Plans, Specifications and Estimate 2 8 6 8 16 24 8 72 $ 15,767.50 $ - $ 15,767.50 $ 15,767.50 TASK 5 DESIGN ENGINEERING EVALUATION REPORT 8 0 32 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 $ 15,040.00 $ - $ 15,040.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 15,040.00

5.1 Prepare DEER 4 24 8 36 $ 11,140.00 $ - $ 11,140.00 $ 11,140.00

5.2 Maintenance Agreement Support 4 8 12 $ 3,900.00 $ - $ 3,900.00 $ 3,900.00 TASK 6 BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT 8 24 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 $ 19,360.00 $ - $ 19,360.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 19,360.00

6.1 Bidding Support 4 8 24 36 $ 10,580.00 $ - $ 10,580.00 $ 10,580.00

6.2 Construction Support 4 16 8 28 $ 8,780.00 $ - $ 8,780.00 $ 8,780.00 128 88 84 56 106 76 176 104 44 2 8 12 16 26 8 934 $ 255 600 27 $ 26 300 00 $ 281 900 $ 44,263.50 $ 28,600.00 $ 26,460.00 $ 16,240.00 $ 29,150.00 $ 20,140.00 $ 44,778.00 $ 12,480.00 $ 10,560.00 $ 690.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 3,300.00 $ 4,240.00 $ 10,530.00 $ 1,568.77 $ 281,900.27 $ 120,550.10 $ 402,450.37

DESCRIPTION
360 Total Concepts

TOTAL TASK TOTAL
HOURS

TOTAL TASK
LABOR TOTAL ODC's TOTAL TASK FEE AMOUNT
LaborReimbursablesSubtotal

TOTAL HOURS
TOTAL COST WOOD RODGERS TOTAL 360 TOTAL CONCEPTS TOTAL

EXHIBIT B

Task Proposed Hours Proposed Cost Notes/Assumptions
Task 1: Engagement Planning and Project Coordination
Project Kickoff 10 ($ 1,889.50 )
Includes coordination with Wood Rodgers/city pre-kickoff, attendance at kickoff meeting (virtual or in-person), and preparation of post-meeting notes and action items. 12-month project; kickoff is a one-time event.

Community Engagement Plan 20 ($ 3,779.00 )
Includes drafting engagement plan, internal QA/QC, incorporating team feedback, and finalizing; Additional hours as buffer since three different locations Stakeholder List 54 ($ 10,203.30 )
Includes initial research and list build across 3 overcrossing corridors, plus periodic updates at each design milestone (65%, 95%, final). ~3 milestone updates Meeting minutes and coordination documentation 48 ($ 9,069.60 ) RFP specifies virtual project review meetings 'at least once a month' for the duration of the agreement (up to 12 months). Estimate: 12 meetings
LBCE work distribution and documentation support 17 ($ 3,212.15 ) Includes initial setup of work distribution tracking, coordination with Wood Rodgers on documentation, and periodic updates to ensure compliance records are current. Initial setup 5 hours; ongoing maintenance 1 hour per month for the year Task 2: Community Outreach & Public Meetings
Site visit participation 24 ($ 4,534.80 )
RFP Section VIII.2 specifies one site visit with City staff across the 3 overcrossing locations (Santa Rita Rd, Hacienda Dr, Hopyard Rd).

Community workshops/open houses 80 ($ 15,116.00 )
Community workshop or other large scale community event; this includes planning, execution and follow up; assumed one event covering all three locations business and stakeholder outreach 75 ($ 14,171.25 )
Targeted outreach to businesses and organizations including door-to-door and phone calls; Estimate Meeting summaries and feedback reports 40 ($ 7,558.00 ) Tied to community workshops and outreach activities. Post-event summaries and feedback reports
Task 3: Project Communications & Public Information Materials Project fact sheets 60 ($ 11,337.00 )
Unknown amount yet; estimating 3 locations, and 2 fact sheets for each over the duration of 12 months.

Digital content to support the project (social media/website) 35 ($ 6,613.25 ) Not specified but an available option; we can provide social media support and website development/maintenance support;
community notices about project status 40 ($ 7,558.00 ) Provide community notices including printed, eblast, and drop offs (flyers); not specified in the RFP. presentation materials for public meetings 25 ($ 4,723.75 ) Providing project team with information for public meetings including attendance/outreach data analysis and presentation materials
Task 4: Documentation, Reporting & QA
Outreach logs and activity tracking 60 ($ 11,337.00 ) Tracking ongoing engagement and outreach including analysis of collected data.

Engagement Report(s) 50 ($ 9,447.50 )
Estimate is for approx 2 engagement reports (one middle and one final); approximately 25 hours for each including data, design, and review/edit cycles TOTALS 638 ($ 120,550.10 )

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 13

WORK PLAN/SCOPE OF WORK
Project Understanding
The I-580 Overcrossings Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Plan is a high priority project in the City’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, which will provide protected bike lanes, improved sidewalks, and more visible crosswalks through the interchanges at Hopyard Road, Hacienda Drive, and Santa Rita Road.

The goal of work to be performed with this Proposal is to provide the City with a design that has gained Caltrans’ approval and deliver final construction documents that are ready to advertise and bid. The conceptual plans that have been prepared will be used as the basis for the final design and will be submitted to Caltrans, along with a Design Engineering Evaluation Report (DEER), for project approval.

The key to maintaining the project schedule will be delivering a complete DEER submittal to Caltrans as early as possible that includes a design that minimizes non-standard features, which will require review and approval of a Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD). Unfortunately, overcrossings and interchanges are generally excluded from the design standards found in Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 94 for Complete Streets, so the design will be required to follow the requirements of DIB 82- 06 and the lane and shoulder widths of the Highway Design Manual.

The DEER and DSDD for any non-standard features will be submitted to Caltrans no later than the development of the project plans for the 65% submittal, but we will engage Caltrans much earlier to present the design concepts and gain an understanding of what their expectations and key concerns are for project approval.

Wood Rodgers assumes that these projects will qualify for a Categorical Exemption for CEQA under 15301(c) Existing Facilities.

The City, in coordination with Caltrans, will file a Notice of Exemption form for CEQA compliance. Since no federal funds have been programmed to the project, no NEPA review is expected to be needed. Wood Rodgers anticipates that only a traffic analysis would be required and no other environmental technical studies should be needed to support the CEQA exemption.

The Notice of Exemption form should be included as an attachment to the DEER.

Scope of Work
TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Maintaining the schedule and ensuring Caltrans’ approval for the project will require a proactive project
management plan that are addressed in our work plan.

Task 1.1 – Project Management
The Wood Rodgers Project Manager will coordinate all
Consultant operations with the City, including but not
limited to, tracking progress of the scope of work and
administering subcontracts. Wood Rodgers shall provide
overall project management, coordination, and
supervision of project status to facilitate the performance of the work in accordance with standards and
requirements of the City and other applicable standards and requirements. Consultant Project Manager shall
prepare and submit monthly project progress reports to
the City’s Project Manager. This scope assumes project
management will be required over a twelve (12) month
schedule.

Task 1.2 – CoordinaƟon and MeeƟngs
The Project Manager shall conduct the project kick-off
meetings, hold regular meetings with City, and shall
conduct meetings and coordination with other
stakeholders, City, and other agencies, in monthly Project Development Team (PDT) meetings or technical
workshops and focused meetings as necessary. Wood
Rodgers will prepare agendas and meeting minutes,
Communication and distribution of project records and
information, and responses to all internal requests for information about the project. This task includes four (4) stakeholder meetings with Caltrans as needed to discuss their concerns and the review and approval of the DEER.

Task 1.3 – Project AdministraƟon
Wood Rodgers will prepare and update the Project
schedule monthly or as needed. The project schedule
shall be logical, complete, and shall consider City peer reviews. Wood Rodgers will provide weekly email updates reporting on the project status, including, but not limited to, project schedule including planned and actual target dates, contract budget, general progress on project tasks, and project issues and concerns. and procedures.

Task 1 Deliverables:
• Project Schedule / Progress Reports (Updated
Monthly – 12 Months)
• Weekly status reports via email
• Monthly Meeting Agendas and Notes
• Caltrans Meeting Agendas and Notes
ATTACHMENT 3

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 14 TASK 2 – PROJECT INITIATION
Task 2.1 – Preliminary InvesƟgaƟon, Research,
and Site Visit
Wood Rodgers will obtain existing as-built plans and right of way record maps from the City of Pleasanton and
Caltrans, and facility mapping from utility providers within the project area. Following the kick-off meeting, a field review will be scheduled with the City to visit the sites and identify any potential issues or concerns.

Task 2.2 – Topographic Survey
Wood Rodgers will perform a topographic survey for the
project site. One (1) Foot Contour intervals will be
generated from aerial photographs. Existing conditions
and 2D planimetric features shall be located and will
include but not be limited to fences, roads, curbs,
driveways, paths, buildings, walls, etc. Surface utilities (sanitary sewer, storm drain, water, gas, power and
communications) features and structures, visible from air shall be located and shown on the mapping. The utility
type will be confirmed on the ground and with as-built
plans which is included in Task 2.3. Project accuracy will conform to general accepted photogrammetric standards
established by the USGS National Map Accuracy
Standards. The horizontal and vertical control shall be based on the California State Plane Zone III coordinates and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD
88). (Includes aerial orthorectified color photo - digital copy)
Features not measured in the Aerial Topographic Survey
and needed for design will be measured from the ground
with conventional methods. Utilities, features under tree canopies, street cross-sections and other details for design will be captured with this item. We will also measure the pipe inverts of utilities at manholes and catch basins. This item assumes 2 days of a 2-person crew in the field
collecting data and office time for processing the data.

Project AssumpƟons

1. No boundary surveys or Right of Way acquisition is
included in this proposal. It is assumed that the
improvements will all be on the overcrossings and
the existing right-of-way is sufficient.

2. The topographic survey will primarily include the
top of overcrossings. Spot grades can be generated
on the lower freeway and ground but the
topographic surface will be on the top of the
overcrossings. Utilities and other improvements will
also only be mapped on the top of the
overcrossings.

Task 2.3 – UƟlity ConŇict IdenƟĮcaƟon and
PosiƟve LocaƟon
Wood Rodgers will send utility mapping requests (Utility ‘A’ Letters) to known utility owners in the project area.

Wood Rodgers will use a combination of record
information provided, GIS data, and as-built information to develop a utility base map. It is recommended that
veriĮcation of underground utilities be completed during the design phase. We have included an estimated direct
cost budget for potholing. However, the exact amount
may change based on the Įnal design plans.

Task 2 Deliverables:
• Topographic Survey
• Utility Base Map
• Utility Conflict Mapping
TASK 3 – COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
For this project, Team 360 will serve as the community
engagement and public communications lead, bringing
proven outreach systems, trusted community
relationships, and the consensus-building and
communication skills needed to keep diverse stakeholders informed and engaged throughout a complex, multiphase project. Our in-house media production capabilities further support this work - allowing us to develop clear, accessible materials that help the public understand and connect with infrastructure improvements at every stage.

Our approach emphasizes clarity, accessibility, and
accountability - ensuring that the City of Pleasanton,
Caltrans, corridor stakeholders, and the broader public remain aligned and conĮdent throughout design,
permitting, and construction advertisement.

As the community engagement and communications
subconsultant, we will lead all outreach and public
communications activities in support of Wood Rodgers
and the City of Pleasanton. Building on our active work on corridor improvement projects across Alameda County –
including projects requiring Caltrans District 4 permitting - Team 360 brings trusted regional relationships and a deep understanding of what it takes to keep communities
informed and engaged throughout a complex, multiphase design and permitting process.

Our approach to this project is grounded in the
understanding that bicycle and pedestrian improvements
at high-trafĮc freeway overcrossings affect a wide range of users, including cyclists, pedestrians, adjacent businesses, disability and accessibility advocates, and the broader traveling public. Effective engagement means meeting

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 15 those stakeholders where they are and communicating
clearly about design decisions and their real-world
impacts. We are experienced in building the public
conĮdence needed to carry a project through design,
permitting, and into construction. Team 360 is committed to delivering that engagement in a way that is transparent, and reŇective of the Pleasanton community's priorities.

Task 3.1 – Engagement Planning and Project
CoordinaƟon
We will begin the project with a structured kickoff process that aligns the full project team - including Wood Rodgers and the City of Pleasanton - on objectives, timelines, roles, and communication protocols. Following our initial
roadmapping, Team 360 will develop a comprehensive
Community Engagement Plan that deĮnes outreach goals,
target audiences, methods, and deliverables organized
around the project's major design milestones.

We will develop and maintain a stakeholder list
encompassing businesses, residents, neighborhood
organizations, disability advocates, cycling and pedestrian groups, and other corridor stakeholders within the project area. Our practice is to treat the stakeholder list as a living document, updated throughout the project as design
advances and new contacts are identiĮed.

Throughout the design phase, we will maintain a steady
coordination rhythm with Wood Rodgers and the City,
participating in project team meetings, preparing meeting documentation, and tracking action items and
commitments to ensure nothing falls through the cracks.

Team 360 also brings direct expertise working in the
Alameda County Region for 20 years and understanding
of Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) program
requirements - having development and managed local
compliance programs throughout Alameda County - and
will coordinate with Wood Rodgers to ensure all
compliance documentation and work distribution tracking are well-organized from project initiation.

Task 3.1 Deliverables:
• Community Engagement Plan (draft and Įnal)
• Stakeholder list(s); kickoff meeting summary
• Meeting minutes and coordination documentation
• LBCE work distribution documentation support.

Task 3.2 – Community Outreach and Public
MeeƟngs
We will participate in the project site visit alongside the project team, using that opportunity to develop a
Įrsthand understanding of the three overcrossing
locations at Santa Rita Road, Hacienda Drive, and Hopyard Road and identify the businesses, neighborhoods,
organizations and residents in the immediate vicinity that will be priority audiences for outreach. We recognize that each of the three corridors may present a distinct
engagement proĮle, and we will tailor our stakeholder
identiĮcation and outreach approach accordingly.

As design advances, We will organize and facilitate public outreach activities throughout each design milestone,
ensuring that the Pleasanton community has meaningful
opportunities to learn about the project, ask questions, and provide input that informs design decisions. We will organize and facilitate community workshops and open
house events, coordinating all logistics including venue, materials, accessibility accommodations, and stafĮng.

Our extensive experience conducting public meetings for the OakDOT streetscape projects includes successfully
facilitating community forums, corridor open houses,
interactive design feedback sessions and even door-todoor visits with corridor businesses. we will bring that same intentional, hands-on approach to Pleasanton. We
will also conduct targeted outreach to businesses and
organizations adjacent to the three overcrossing locations, ensuring that stakeholders who may not attend formal
meetings still receive timely, accurate information about the project.

All public engagement activities will be documented
through meeting summaries, attendance records, and
feedback reports that capture community input in a
format useful to the design team.

Task 3.2 Deliverables:
• Community workshops / open house events
• Business and stakeholder outreach
• Meeting summaries and feedback reports
• Attendance documentation
TASK 3.3 – PROJECT COMMUNICATIONS

AND PUBLIC INFORMATION MATERIALS
We will develop and manage all public-facing
communications materials throughout the design and
permitting process. Our in-house communications and
media production team will produce a full suite of project materials designed to explain complex design
improvements in clear, accessible terms for a general
audience.

Materials will include project fact sheets and one-pagers, construction and project update notices, digital content for the project website and social media channels, and
presentation materials for public meetings and

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 16 stakeholder brieĮngs. As the project moves toward the
Caltrans permitting phase and eventual construction
advertisement, Team 360 will develop pre-construction
community notiĮcations, including mailers, door hangers, and business toolkits, that communicate timing, access
changes, and project phasing clearly and in advance.

We have a proven track record producing project
explainer videos and visual animations for OakDOT
corridor improvement projects, including the Broadway
and Embarcadero West streetscape improvements —
work that translated complex design plans into clear,
community-facing visuals that helped the public
understand what changes to expect and how
improvements would beneĮt them. For the I-580
overcrossing improvements, where bridge design changes
may be difĮcult for the public to visualize from plans
alone, this type of visual storytelling can be a powerful tool for building community understanding and support.

We will coordinate with Wood Rodgers on the
development of all visual content to ensure accuracy and alignment with the design at each submittal stage.

Task 3.3 Deliverables:
• Project fact sheets and update notices;
• Digital content (web, social media);
• Pre-construction community notiĮcations; project
explainer video / visual
• animation (as directed);
• Presentation materials for public meetings.

Task 3.4 – DocumentaƟon, ReporƟng, and
Quality Assurance
We will maintain organized records of all engagement
activities, including outreach logs, meeting
documentation, stakeholder correspondence, and
feedback summaries. We will provide the project team
with regular progress updates and prepare engagement
summary reports at key project milestones.

All public-facing materials will go through an internal QA/QC review process before distribution to ensure
accuracy, clarity, and consistency with the project's design status and messaging. We will coordinate closely with
Wood Rodgers throughout to ensure that engagement
activities and communications remain aligned with the
design and permitting schedule.

Task 3.4 Deliverables:
• Outreach logs and activity tracking;
• Milestone engagement reports;
• QA/QC review of all public-facing materials.

TASK 4 – PROJECT DESIGN
Following the development of base mapping from the
topographic survey, right of way base map, and utility
base map, Wood Rodgers will prepare detailed designs for each interchange that builds upon the conceptual design, updating the design to reflect any issues identified with the field walk, initial discussions with the City and
Caltrans, and updated design criteria since the project was paused.

Task 4.1 – Traĸc and Collision Analysis
Wood Rodgers will prepare a Traffic and Collision Analysis summarizing the current and forecasted traffic volumes, as well as the history of collisions within the project area.

This analysis will focus on how the proposed project will affect operations on I-580 with the modifications of the on- and off-ramps of the three interchanges. The collision analysis will provide a summary of collision history,
identify primary causes of the collisions, and how the
project will affect each type of collision.

Task 4.2 – Storm Water Data Report (Short
Form)
Wood Rodgers will prepare a short form Storm Water
Data Report (SWDR) to include with the Caltrans DEER.

The SWDR will address permanent and temporary water
pollution control measures to comply with the State’s
NPDES general construction permit
Task 4.3 – TransportaƟon Management Plan
Wood Rodgers will prepare a Transportation Management
Plan (TMP) for the project consistent with Caltrans
Transportation Management Plan Guidelines (dated
November 2015). The TMP will consist of sections
addressing some or all the following strategies at a plan level: roles and responsibilities, public information,
motorist information, incident management, construction strategies (e.g., lane closure charts), demand
management, alternative routes (or detours), and
continency plans. Wood Rodgers will coordinate with
Caltrans Traffic Operations on preparation and review of the TMP. Wood Rodgers will prepare materials required
for a major lane closure request for the ramps and any
needed lane closures within Caltrans right of way. Recent data will be obtained from the Caltrans Traffic Census
Program website, the Performance Measurement System
(PeMS) website, or via a request to Caltrans Traffic
Operations staff. It is assumed that Wood Rodgers will not collect new data for the TMP, and all data will be obtained from Caltrans.

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 17 Task 4.4 – 65% Plans & EsƟmate
Wood Rodgers will advance the design of the bike and
pedestrian improvements shown on the conceptual plans
and develop 65% project plans and construction cost
estimates for each location.

Preparation of the project plans will be consistent with the City of Pleasanton and Caltrans Standards. Wood Rodgers will perform an internal QA/QC review of the plans prior to submittal to the City.

The project plans will include electrical plans for the installation of the Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons and Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon shown on the concept plans, as well as the relocation of the street lights.

The anticipated number of plan sheets to be prepared for the improvements are listed in the table below:

SHEET TITLE SCALE COUNT
Title Sheet N/A 1
Typical Cross SecƟons N/A 3
Key Map / Control Sheet 1”=100’ 1
Plan and ProĮle 1”=50’ 6
ConstrucƟon Details 1”=10’ 12
UƟlity Plan 1”=50’ 6
Stage ConstrucƟon/Detour Plans 1”=100’ 3
Signing and Pavement DelineaƟon 1”=50’ 6
Electrical Plans 1”=50’ 12
TOTAL 50
Task 4.5 – 95% Plans, SpeciĮcaƟons & EsƟmate
Following the City review of the 65% submittal, we will update the project plans and estimate and prepare
responses to each comment received. Along with the
updated plans and estimate, we will assemble and edit
the Caltrans Standard Special Provisions for the bid items.

Task 4.6 – Final Plans, SpeciĮcaƟons & EsƟmate
Following the City review of the 95% submittal, we will update the project plans, Special Provisions, and cost
estimate for the Final submittal. We will prepare
responses to each comment received.

Task 4 Deliverables
• Traffic Operations Analysis Report
• Storm Water Data Report (Short Form)
• Transportation Management Plan
• 65% P&E, 95% PS&E, Final PS&E (PDF)
• Pending Resident Engineer File
• Supplemental PS&E Materials
• QA/QC Plan Check and Review Documents at Each
Submittal
TASK 5 – DESIGN ENGINEERING

EVALUATION REPORT
The Design Engineering Evaluation Report (DEER) will be prepared in accordance with the Guidelines provided in
Appendix I of Caltrans’ Project Development Procedures
Manual. Wood Rodgers will serve as the primary contract to Caltrans in the preparation, review, and approval of the DEER
Task 5.1 – Prepare DEER
The key factors for a project to use the DEER as a project initiation and approval document are:
• The project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption for CEQA and Categorical Exclusion for NEPA, or the
project does not result in an increase in Vehicle
Miles Traveled if a higher level of environmental
document is required.
• The project has a single-build alternative
• No CTC action is required
• No FHWA approval is needed due to a change in
access control or right of way relinquishment
• No bridge widening or new structures that are not
constructed per Caltrans’ Standard Plans are
proposed
The supporting documentation that is required to be
submitted with the DEER includes:
• Right of Way Data Sheet for utility conflicts, any
acquisitions, or temporary construction easements
(no acquisitions or TCE’s are anticipated)
• Quality Management Plan describing quality
control and assurance activities
• Design Standard Decision Document to document
the justification for any nonstandard design
features
• Exhibits to supplement the findings of the DEER,
such as the location map, layout plans and typical
cross sections.
• An approved CEQA/NEPA document
• Traffic and Collision Analysis summarizing the
current and forecasted traffic volumes, as well as
the history of collisions within the project area
• A maintenance agreement and any other permits
Wood Rodgers has extensive experience in the
preparation of Project Initiation and Project Approval
documents for local agencies working with Caltrans, most recently having prepared a DEER for a Class I shared-use

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 18 path within the State Route 49 corridor within the City of Sonora for the Tuolumne County Transportation Council.

Task 5.2 – Maintenance Agreement Support
Wood Rodgers will facilitate the development of a
Maintenance Agreement between the City and Caltrans
which will provide a clear understanding of what
elements will be maintained by the City and what
elements Caltrans would be responsible for. This
discussion will take place during the early stages of the project design in conjunction with the development of the DEER.

TASK 6 – BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION

SUPPORT
Following the completion of the project plans, Wood
Rodgers will submit the Resident Engineer Pending File
and any supplemental information needed for the bid
documents.

Task 6.1 – Bidding Support
Wood Rodgers will respond to Request for Information
(RFI) during the bid period and prepare revisions if needed for an addendum.

Task 6.2 – ConstrucƟon Support
Wood Rodgers will attend a construction kick-off meeting after contract award. We will review any proposed
Contract Change Orders and respond as needed. We will
prepare As-built Record Drawings following the
completion of construction from the Resident Engineer’s markups of any design changes.

RFP: City of Pleasanton, I-580 Overcrossing Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP #22570) | 19

SCHEDULE

Item #6.a

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
May 19, 2026
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF HOUSING AND

HUMAN SERVICES GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
2026/27 GRANT FUNDING CYCLE AND APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENTS

SUMMARY
The Pleasanton Housing and Human Services Grant (HHSG) program combines federal and local funding sources into a single grant program. The four sources of HHSG funding include the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs, the City's Lower Income Housing Fund (LIHF), and the City's General Fund.

For the fiscal year (FY) 2026/27 HHSG program, the City piloted a one-year Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process and received 19 applications for funding from a range of agencies serving diverse community needs. For the FY 2026/27 grant funding cycle, a total of $952,932 would be allocated to various programs from all funding sources. This report summarizes the applications received for the HHSG program and provides a funding recommendation for allocation of funds beginning July 1, 2026.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Allocate $852,932 from non-General Fund sources listed to fund the applications as presented in Table A of the draft Resolution for human services-related and housing-related programs and projects, as follows:

CDBG Public Services
$57,667
CDBG Administration $76,890
CDBG Section 108 Loan $22,810
CDBG Capital $227,082
LIHF $402,075
HOME Programs $60,480
HOME Administration $5,928
TOTAL $852,932

2. Allocate $100,000 from the City General Fund to fund applications as presented in Table A of the draft Resolution for human services-related programs, as follows:

General Fund $100,000
TOTAL $100,000

3. Adopt the attached Resolution approving the allocation of HHSG funds for FY 2026/27 (as listed in Table A of the Draft Resolution) and authorize the City Manager and/or his designee to enter into individual contracts with each agency receiving HHSG funds and take all other actions necessary to carry out the HHSG program for FY 2026/27.

4. Approve the budget amendments related to non-General Fund allocations.

BACKGROUND
Established in 2010, the City of Pleasanton Housing and Human Services Grant (HHSG) program consolidates funding from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), the City's Lower Income Housing Fund (LIHF), and City General Funds into a single grant program. Prior to May 2024, housing and human services applications were evaluated by separate commissions. Following the consolidation of the Housing Commission into the Planning Commission, all grant reviews were consolidated under the Human Services Commission beginning with the fiscal year (FY) 2025/26 grant cycle. The Human Services Commission was paused for the FY 2026/27 cycle due to budget reductions and related staffing constraints. Therefore, this year's funding recommendation is provided by staff, informed by the Commission's expressed priorities and funding strategy from the prior HHSG grant cycle.

FY 2026/27 HHSG Process
To accommodate the Commission pause and improve efficiency, the City piloted a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process for FY 2026/27 HHSG funding, covering July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. The RFQ opened December 18, 2025, was posted on the City's website and distributed to nonprofit agencies throughout the Tri-Valley. Applications were submitted through ZoomGrants by the January 30, 2026 deadline.

Nineteen (19) applications were received from nonprofit partners, representing a total funding request of $949,940. The total FY 2026/27 HHSG funding recommendation reflects awards to recipients across all funding sources (totaling $952,932), and additional obligations from prior cycles, including the $22,810 annual Section 108 loan repayment associated with the Axis Community Health clinic rehabilitation project funded in 2015, and City program administration costs for CDBG and HOME. The City's federal funding allocations (CDBG and HOME) will be incorporated into the FY 2026/27 Annual Action Plan, due to HUD by June 3, 2026. Action Plan approval is agendized separately for the May 19, 2026 City Council meeting.

DISCUSSION
The City of Pleasanton's recommended Housing and Human Services Grant (HHSG) program funding reflects a strategic, community-centered approach to maximizing beneficial impact with limited available resources. By leveraging multiple funding sources — including HUD CDBG and HOME funds, the City's LIHF, and General Fund allocations — the recommended awards represent a coordinated investment in the most pressing human services and housing needs facing Pleasanton residents.

Funding priorities and application rankings were informed by findings from the Eastern Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment (EACHSNA) and recommendations from the previous Human Services Commission. Together, these sources provide a clear and

consistent picture of where community needs are greatest.

This year's recommendations reflect a deliberate shift toward depth over breadth — meaning an effort to fully fund fewer programs that directly address foundational human needs such as food security and stable housing, rather than spread small amounts of funding across a larger number of programs. This approach ensures that selected agencies receive meaningful, sustained support rather than partial funding that may limit program effectiveness. It also acknowledges the operational realities facing the City. By concentrating funding on a smaller portfolio of high-impact programs, staff can maintain more effective oversight and ensure greater accountability, even with reduced administrative capacity.

Of the 19 applications received, the recommended funding plan fully funds eleven (11) organizations (the majority of applicants), and provides partial to near-full funding for four (4) more. Only four (4) organizations are recommended not to receive funding, based on evaluation scores that ranked below the 70 percent threshold. The result is a grant funding strategy that is fiscally responsible, equity-focused, and aligned with both community needs and organizational capacity, delivering the greatest possible benefit to Pleasanton's most vulnerable residents.

Available Funding
Table 1 summarizes the composite level of funding available for the FY 2026/27 HHSG program, including notes on specific limitations or restrictions on use of those funds where applicable.

Table 1: Summary of Available Funding
Funding
Source
Available
Funding
Notes
CDBG: CDBG Entitlement (FY
2026/27): $384,450 Program
Income (PI) received: $0
Total CDBG funds for FY 2026/27: $384,450
Public Services $57,667 Public Services (not to exceed 15% of CDBG Entitlement + PI):
$57,667
Administration $76,890 Administration (not to exceed 20% of CDBG Entitlement + PI):
$76,890
Capital Projects $249,892 Funds for Capital Projects (65% of Total CDBG Entitlement):
$249,892
CDBG Funds allocated for HUD Section 108
Loan Repayment:
$22,810
CDBG Funds allocated to CDBG-eligible capital
project:
$227,082

City General Fund: $100,000 City Council-approved General Fund contribution for human services.

HOME:

Activities
Administration
$60,480
$5,928
$60,480 will be allocated to HOME-eligible
activities, while
$5,928 will be allocated for administration.

LIHF: $402,075 Amount of LIHF recommended for allocation to agencies for housing-related projects/programs.

Federal CDBG and HOME funding allocations
HUD has announced the City's federal CDBG ($384,450) and HOME ($112,635) award amounts for FY 2026/27. The City will allocate the statutory cap of 15 percent of its CDBG allocation for public services activities ($57,667) and the statutory cap of 20 percent for program administration ($76,890). Of the remaining 65 percent ($249,892), $22,810 will be directed toward the HUD Section 108 Loan Repayment obligation, with the remaining $227,082 allocated to continue supporting the Tri-Valley Haven Shiloh Domestic Violence Shelter Rebuild project.

Alameda County Housing & Community Development (HCD) administers the HOME program on behalf of the Alameda County HOME Consortium, of which Pleasanton is a member. HCD is allocating $106,707 in HOME funds for eligible activities and $5,928 for administration, for a total of $112,635 for FY 2026/27. The HHSG RFQ gave priority to applications that demonstrate alignment with the City's HUD FY 2025–2029 Consolidated Plan Goals.

Human Services Grants
Similar to FY 2025/26, $100,000 in General Funds is allocated to the HHSG program for FY 2026/27. This funding is bolstered by LIHF and federal CDBG public services funds.

The Human Services Commission-established funding priorities address the following populations and program areas (listed alphabetically):
• Disability Services and Access to Senior Services
• Food and Nutrition
• Health Care and Behavioral Health
• Homelessness in the Tri-Valley
• Senior Services
• Service Provider Critical Initiatives
• Workforce Development / Unemployment
• Youth Services
The Commission also prioritized service delivery, emphasizing coordination and collaboration with other providers and Tri-Valley cities, prevention activities, and self-sufficiency programs that promote self-reliance and reduce reliance on assistance programs.

Human Services-Related Grant Recommendations

Of the nineteen (19) applications received, ten (10) were determined to be eligible for CDBG or General Fund public services funding. Six (6) of these ten (10) applications are recommended for funding, reflecting the top-ranked eligible programs and aligning with the CDBG statutory 15 percent cap on public services ($57,667) and the $100,000 available General Fund allocation.

Table 2: Summary of Programs Recommended for Funding
The following programs are not recommended for funding, based on the evaluation and scoring system (scoring below the 70 percent threshold):

Recommended for Funding
Rank Organization / Program Recommended
Amount
Funding
Source
% of
Request
Clients
Served
Cost
per
Client
1 Open Heart Kitchen —
Senior Meal Program
$50,000 General
Fund
100% 235 $213
2 Spectrum Community
Services — Meals on
Wheels
$57,667 CDBG
Public
Services
94% 140 $440
3 Tri-Valley Haven —
Shiloh Rebuild
$227,082 CDBG
Capital
Improvement
91% — —
6 Tri-Valley Haven — Food
Pantry
$20,000 General
Fund
80% 500 $50
9 CALICO Center — Child
Abuse Intervention
Program
$10,000 General
Fund
91% — —
12 CLPCCD Tri-Valley
Career Center —
Pathways to Employment
$20,000 General
Fund
63% 185 $172
$384,749

• Hively — Hive on Wheels: Mobile Family Resource Center (Ranked 14th | Score: 69.33) • Assistance League — Operation School Bell (Ranked 15th | Score: 65.67) • Crisis Support Services — Teens for Life (Ranked 16th | Score: 63.00) • Love Never Fails — Therapeutic Outreach Network (Ranked 17th | Score: 54.33) Please see Attachment 1, Exhibit A for a complete summary of funding requests and recommendations.

Housing-Related Grants
In past years, the City has used LIHF funds to supplement limited CDBG program funding for critical housing-related services. Federal HOME funds received through the Alameda County HOME Consortium have also historically been appropriated through the HHSG process.

The City received nine (9) applications from agencies providing housing services, totaling $402,075 in funding requests. Staff is recommending that all of these agencies be funded at their full funding request, as each received a score above 75 (out of 100). Abode Services’ Rapid Re-Housing Program, as in the past, will continue to be funded with both HOME funds for the rental subsidies and LIHF funds for administration costs.

Full details are provided in Attachment 1, Table A.

EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
The HHSG program provides grant funds to non-profit agencies to support programs and services that benefit low-income Pleasanton residents, unhoused individuals at risk of becoming unhoused, individuals with special needs including seniors, those with food insecurity, and victims of abuse, among others. These grant funds help vulnerable populations to remain part of the Pleasanton community and provide them with the support and assistance they need.

OUTREACH
The Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was posted on the City’s website and published through the City’s public bidding process. Applications for HHSG funding were solicited within the application period. The HHSG process was publicized in Tri-Valley news outlets. Applicant agencies have been informed of the public hearing meeting.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This action advances multiple strategies in the ONE Pleasanton Citywide Strategic Plan:
• Building a Community Where Everyone Belongs, Strategy 12 – Implement the results of the Human Services Needs Assessment and streamline housing, human services, and community grant programs to increase program participation and access • Building a Community Where Everyone Belongs, Strategy 6 – Implement the Housing Element and develop a plan to end homelessness
• Building a Community Where Everyone Belongs, Strategy 3 – Implement high priority items from the Library and Recreation Strategic Plan to continue to deliver activities and

programs that meet the needs and interests of the community

FISCAL IMPACT
If approved as recommended, the City Council would approve necessary budget amendments to allocate $952,932 to various programs from a variety of General Fund and non-General Fund sources, as follows and as summarized in Table 3, below:

Table 3: Summary of Fiscal Year 2026/27 HHSG Recommended Funding Allocations by Source
CDBG HOME LIHF General
Fund
TOTAL
Account Number 12330701 12430702 12230700 00199200-
433165
Allocation Category
Public Services $57,667 $100,000 $157,667
CDBG Administration $76,890 $76,890
Capital Projects $249,892 $249,892
Housing Programs $60,480 $402,075 $462,555
HOME Administration $5,928 $5,928
TOTAL: $384,449 $66,408 $402,075 $100,000 $952,932
Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:

Steve Hernandez, Housing
Division Program Manager
Ellen Clark, Director of Community and
Economic Development
Heidi Murphy, Director of Library and
Recreation
Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution Approving FY 2025-2026 HHSG Program Funding

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON TO APPROVE

THE ALLOCATION OF FEDERAL AND CITY FUNDS FOR THE HOUSING AND HUMAN SERVICES GRANT (HHSG) PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/27
WHEREAS, the City has established a Housing and Human Services Grant (HHSG) program that is funded through multiple federal and local sources and is intended to primarily benefit Pleasanton’s low-income population by providing funding for important housing and human services projects; and
WHEREAS, the City as an entitlement community receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding on an annual basis from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). As part of the requirements to receive this funding, the City must prepare and submit the Five-Year Consolidated Plan, Year 1 Action Plan, and all subsequent Annual Action Plans to HUD; and
WHEREAS, the City receives an annual allocation of federal HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funding from Alameda County as part of the City’s membership in the Alameda County HOME Consortium; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the use of local City funds (e.g., Affordable Housing Fee Funds, which was formerly known as the Lower Income Housing Fund, for housing services and General Funds for human services) to supplement federal CDBG and HOME funds is an appropriate use under the guidelines specified for the HHSG program; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 19, 2026, the City Council reviewed the agenda report regarding the proposed HHSG program funding allocations for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING:

SECTION 1. Finds that the award of grants is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that such activity may have a significant effect on the environment, per Title 14 California Code of Regulations §15061(b)(3) (common sense exemption).

SECTION 2. Approves the overall funding for the City's Housing and Human Services Grant (HHSG) program for Fiscal Year 2026/27, as set forth in Table A, attached hereto, including $384,449 in federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds; $66,408 in federal HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds; $402,075 in City Affordable Housing Fee Funds; $100,000 in City General Funds for human services for a total funding amount of $952,932.

SECTION 3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to enter into individual contracts with each agency receiving Pleasanton HHSG funding in FY 2026/27 and to take all other necessary actions to carry out the HHSG program for FY 2026/27.

SECTION 4. Contracts with subrecipient agencies will be executed after the City determines a finding of no significant impact through the federal environmental assessment process, as applicable.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on May 19, 2026.

I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 19 day of May 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney

EXHIBIT A
Agency Name Project Title
Funding
Request
Amount
# Clients/
Households
Cost per
Client/
Household
Committee
Average
Score
(ZoomGrants)
Rankings
(ZoomGrants)
Funding
Recommendations
for FY2026/27
Spectrum Community Services Meals on Wheels Senior Meal Program $ 61,600 140 $440 87.33 2 $ 57,667 Tri-Valley Haven Shiloh Rebuild $ 250,000 N/A N/A 85.67 3 $ 227,082 City of Pleasanton Annual Section 108 Loan Payment (Axis Clinic) N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 22,810 City of Pleasanton Administration of CDBG/HHSG Program N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 76,890 $ 311,600 $ 384,449
Open Heart Kitchen Senior Meal Program $ 50,000 235 $213 87.67 1 $50,000 Tri-Valley Haven Food Pantry $ 25,000 500 $50 81.00 6 $20,000 CALICO Center Child Abuse Intervention Program $ 11,000 14 $786 78.33 9 $10,000 CLPCCD Tri-Valley Career Ctr Pathways to Employment $ 31,785 185 $172 77.00 12 $20,000 Hively Hive on Wheels: Mobile Family Resource Center $ 25,000 1,000 $25 69.33 14 $ - Assistance League Operation School Bell - Clothing the Children $ 5,000 519 $10 65.67 15 $ - Crisis Support Services Teens for Life $ 18,000 24 $625 63.00 16 $ - Love Never Fails Therapeutic Outreach Network $ 10,000 150 $66 54.33 17 $ - $ 175,785 $ 100,000
Tri-Valley Haven Sojourner House - homeless shelter $ 25,000 5 $5,000 85.00 4 $ 25,000 CityServe of the Tri-Valley Housing Stability & Care Coordination Program $ 160,000 400 $400 84.67 5 $ 160,000 CRIL Housing and Independent Living Skills $ 18,000 30 $600 79.33 7 $ 18,000 Tri-Valley REACH Home Improvement, Repairs, Maintenance $ 45,000 22 $2,045 79.00 8 (Tied) $ 45,000 Centro Legal de la Raza Tenants' Rights Project $ 39,555 25 $1,582 79.00 8 (Tied) $ 39,555 Abode Services Rapid Rehousing (Case Management) $ 19,520 10 $1,952 79.00 8 (Tied) $ 19,520 Tri-Valley Haven Shiloh - Domestic Violence Shelter Services $ 25,000 5 $5,000 77.67 10 $ 25,000 Goodness Village Vocational Program $ 30,000 12 $2,500 77.33 11 $ 30,000 ECHO Housing Housing Rights for All $ 40,000 255 $157 75.67 13 $ 40,000 $ 402,075 $ 402,075
Abode Services Rapid Rehousing (rental subsidies) $ 60,480 12 $5,040 79.00 8 (Tied) $ 60,480 City of Pleasanton Administration of HOME Program N/A N/A N/A N/A $ 5,928 $ 60,480 $ 66,408
$ 949,940
Total HHSG Funding Recommendation $ 952,932
Lower Income Housing Fund (LIHF) - Eligible Projects

LIHF-ELIGIBLE REQUESTS
HOME - Eligible Projects

HOME/LIHF-ELIGIBLE REQUESTS
Total Funding Request from All Funding Applications

CDBG-ELIGIBLE REQUESTS
City General Fund - Eligible Projects

CITY GENERAL FUND -ELIGIBLE REQUESTS

TABLE A
FY 2026/27 Housing and Human Services Grant (HHSG) Applications, Scoring Results, and Recommended Funding Allocations CDBG - Eligible Projects

Item #6.b

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
May 19, 2026
Community and Economic Development
TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027) FOR THE USE OF FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS

SUMMARY
Pleasanton will receive $384,450 in federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for federal fiscal year (FY) 2026-2027. This report summarizes and requests City Council approval of the Annual Action Plan for FY 2026-2027 that must be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in order for the City to receive its FY 2026-2027 allocation of CDBG funds. As a separate agenda item at this May 19, 2026, meeting, the allocation of the FY 2026 federal CDBG funds are presented as part of the allocation of Housing and Human Services Grant (HHSG) funding to local non-profit agencies; the recommended program allocations are reflected in the draft Action Plan.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution Approving the Annual Action Plan (FY 2026-2027) for the use of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.

BACKGROUND
The City receives an annual allocation of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, generally to support housing-related programs and activities for eligible lowerincome residents. To receive its annual CDBG allocation, the City must submit an “Annual Action Plan” to HUD. The Annual Action Plan includes a list of projects and activities to be funded with CDBG funds, as well as an annual assessment of the City’s progress toward meeting its housing and community development goals. Every five years, the City must also submit a 5-Year Consolidated Plan (Consolidated Plan), which must include a statement of its local goals and objectives related to housing and community development. A new 5-Year Consolidated Plan for fiscal years 2025 through 2029 (FY 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan) was completed last year. As a separate but related action, the City Council will review and consider approval of the CDBG-funded projects and activities reflected in the action plan, as part of the annual Housing and Human Services Grant (HHSG) process.

As a member of the Alameda County HOME Consortium (Consortium), Pleasanton is eligible to receive an annual allocation of federal HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds for affordable housing activities, in addition to its CDBG allocation. The Consortium coordinates the submittal of a composite Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan to HUD; however, each City member of the Consortium is required to submit its own section of the Consolidated Plan and the Annual Action Plan. The draft Annual Action Plan for FY 2026 for the City of Pleasanton is included as Attachment 1 to this report.

DISCUSSION

The draft Annual Action Plan (Attachment 1) is similar in format and content to the plans submitted in previous years. Among the content of of the Action Plan are goals, policies, and programs from the City’s most recent Housing Element and the Eastern Alameda County Human Needs Assessment (EACHSNA). The resulting document is a reasonable expression of the City’s goals and objectives for human services, housing, and community development, particularly as they relate to the needs of the City’s lower-income population and the use of the relatively small allocation of federal grant funds received for housing and community development activities.

HUD regulations impose the following limits on the use of CDBG funds: 1) At least 70 percent of all funds must be spent on activities that benefit low-income persons; 2) No more than 15 percent of the CDBG funds can be used for public service activities; and 3) No more than 20 percent of the CDBG funds can be used for administrative activities. The proposed Annual Action Plan complies with these requirements.

Staff recommends that the City Council provide comments on the attached Draft FY 2026- 2027 Annual Action Plan, which is currently available for a 30-day public comment period (April 20, 2026 through May 19, 2026), as necessary, listen to any public testimony regarding the plans; and approve the document for submission to HUD by the June 3, 2026 deadline.

EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
The HHSG program, and corresponding programs reflected in the Action Plan addresses grant funding for nonprofit agencies to support direct programs and services for low-income Pleasanton residents, including those who are unhoused or at risk of becoming unhoused, and those with special needs. Providing these grant funds helps the most vulnerable populations remain part of the Pleasanton community and provides them with support and assistance.

OUTREACH
A Notice of Public Hearing for the May 19, 2026 City Council meeting to review and approve the Draft HUD Annual Action Plan for FY 2026-2027 was published in the locally circulated newspaper The Valley Times on April 22, 2026. The Draft Action Plan is available for review and public comments for a 30-day period from April 20, 2026 through May 19, 2026. The City is soliciting public comments from City subrecipients, other agencies and those on the City’s CDBG distribution list.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
This action advances the following Citywide goals and strategies:

ONE Pleasanton Citywide Strategic Plan:
• Building a Community Where Everyone Belongs, Strategy 1 – Apply strategies from the City’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Action Plan to increase equitable access to City programs and services for the Community.
• Building a Community Where Everyone Belongs, Strategy 3 – Implement high priority items from the Library and Recreation Strategic Plan to continue to deliver activities and programs that meet the needs and interests of the community.
• Building a Community Where Everyone Belongs, Strategy 12 – Implement the results of the Human Services Needs Assessment and streamline housing, human services, and community grant programs to increase program participation and access.

FISCAL IMPACT
The approval of the FY 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan will not have a direct fiscal impact on the City. As noted earlier, the City will receive an allocation of $384,450 in CDBG funds for FY 2026-2027, which will help to support a number of the City’s housing and human services programs and activities. The preparation and submission of the Annual Action Plan is a requirement for receipt of the funds.

Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:

Steve Hernandez, Housing
Division Program Manager
Ellen Clark, Director of Community and
Economic Development
Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution FY26/27 Action Plan

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (FY 2026-2027) FOR THE USE OF FEDERAL COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City as an entitlement community receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding on an annual basis from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and
WHEREAS, as part of the requirements to receive this funding, the City must prepare and submit the Five-Year Consolidated Plan, Year 1 Action Plan, and all subsequent Annual Action Plans to HUD; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING:

SECTION 1. Finds that the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) generally exempts planning documents such as the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan from environmental review, with project-level review to be conducted as possible.

SECTION 2. The City Council approves the FY 2026/2027 Annual Action Plan, and authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to submit the Action Plan to HUD and to execute all documents and certifications necessary to secure and award funding for the City.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on May 19, 2026.

I, Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, California, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 19 day of May 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
_____________________________
Jocelyn Kwong, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Daniel G. Sodergren, City Attorney

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

EXHIBIT A
DRAFT
Action Plan
FY 2026 ‐ 2027
Alameda County HOME Consortium
Public Review Period: April 20 – May 19, 2026

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Executive Summary
AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b)

1. Introduction
Alameda County Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) of the Alameda County Community Development Agency is the lead agency for the Alameda County HOME Consortium, which includes the cities of Alameda, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Pleasanton, San Leandro, and Union City, and the Urban County, which includes the cities of Albany, Dublin, Emeryville, Newark, and Piedmont, and the unincorporated areas of the County.

The HOME Consortium (referred to as the Consortium in this document) has adopted a five‐year consolidated planning cycle starting July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2030, and has produced this Action Plan for the second year of that cycle (July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2027) (FY26). This Action Plan has been prepared for all jurisdictions in the Consortium. HCD coordinated the process with the assistance of community development and planning staff from each of the Consortium’s jurisdictions.

The Consolidated Plan and Action Plan are important documents for the HOME Consortium. Built on interagency coordination, consultation, and public participation, the Consolidated Plan and Action Plan focus on housing and community development needs and the resources available to meet them.

2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan This could be a restatement of items or a table listed elsewhere in the plan or a reference to another location. It may also contain any essential items from the housing and homeless needs assessment, the housing market analysis or the strategic plan.

The City of Pleasanton’s Consolidated Plan will prioritize the use of federal funds for the following priorities:
• Support public services for low-income residents
• Support the expansion or improvements, including ADA accessibility, to public facilities and infrastructure, parks and recreational facilities, and neighborhood facilities.

The City’s priorities, which will be funded with federal CDBG funds, are in line with the needs in the Pleasanton community and align with the Priority Needs and Five-Year Objectives that will be the focus of activities over the next five years for the Alameda County Housing and Community Development and the Alameda County HOME Consortium.

3. Evaluation of past performance
This is an evaluation of past performance that helped lead the grantee to choose its goals or projects.

An evaluation of FY2024 activities was developed for public comment in September 2025. Accomplishmentsof FY2024 activities were included in the FY2024-2025 CAPER that was released for public comment in September 2025 and has since been approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Please refer to prior year CAPERs for an evaluation of past performance. The CAPER for FY2025-2026 will be completed in September 2026.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process Summary from citizen participation section of plan.

Community participation is a very important part of the Action Plandevelopment process. The City maintains an active database of potential interested parties and uses it to send out notification of grant funding opportunities at the beginning of every application cycle (early December) which is also the beginning of the annual Action Plan (and Consolidated Plan) process. The list currently includes approximately 250 nonprofit agencies, individuals, and other interested parties. In addition, ads are placed in local newspapers (including the Pleasanton Weekly which is distributed to every household in Pleasanton) and on the City’s website. Interested parties have multiple opportunities to participate and provide input on the process starting with annual grant workshops in early December through the annual CAPER hearing held annually in August.

The 30-day public comment period for the Draft Action Plan required by HUD, will take place from April 20 through May 19, 2026. A public hearing at a Pleasanton City Council meeting will be held on May 19, 2026, to take comments on the Draft Action Plan. A Public Hearing Notice was published in a locally circulated newspaper The Valley Times on April 22, 2026. Alameda County also published notices regarding the DRAFT Consolidated Plans on April 6, 2026 in the following newspapers: Alameda Times Star, Oakland Tribune, Hayward Daily Review, Fremont Argus and the Tri-Valley Herald. Public notices also will be placed on each Consortium jurisdiction’s website. The notices include provisions for how the disabled can access the meeting along with a detailed description of what is included in the Action Plan.

The draft Consolidated Plan will be distributed to all cities and main library branches in Alameda County, HUD, and any interested citizens, organizations, or agencies. The City will also post the draft and final plans on its web site. Once the Consolidated Plan is adopted, it will be made available along with any substantial amendments (if necessary) and the annual performance reports made to the general public. Distribution will be the same as mentioned above as well as any requests made to HCD for a copy of the Action Plan.

Materials will also be made available in alternate formats upon request.

5. Summary of public comments
This could be a brief narrative summary or reference an attached document from the Citizen Participation section of the Con Plan.

All public comments received will be included in the Consolidated Plan.

6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them Not applicable.

7. Summary
None.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
PR‐05 Lead & Responsible Agencies ‐ 91.200(b)

1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.

Agency Role Name Department/Agency
Lead Agency PLEASANTON
CDBG Administrator PLEASANTON City Manager / Housing Division HOPWA Administrator
HOME Administrator
HOPWA‐C Administrator
Table 1– Responsible Agencies
Narrative
The Consolidated Plan is prepared by the City's Housing Manager who reports directly to the Community Development Director. The Housing Manager is also responsible for administering the CDBG program and is the liaison to County of Alameda for matters related to the HOME program (the City of Pleasanton is a member of the Alameda County HOME Consortium).

Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
City of Pleasanton
Attn: Steve Hernandez, Housing Manager
200 Old Bernal Ave.

P.O. Box 520
Pleasanton, CA 94566‐0802 925‐931‐5007
[email protected]

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
PR‐10 Consultation ‐ 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.215(l)

1. Introduction
The Consolidated Plan is an important document for the Alameda County HOME Consortium. Built on interagency coordination, consultation, and public participation, the Consolidated Plan focuses attention on housing and community development needs and resources available to meet these needs.

The FY2025-2029 Consolidated Plan was prepared through consultation with other public and private entities. At the countywide level, the HOME Consortium Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), composed of staff from all jurisdictions in the HOME Consortium, met bi‐monthly to provide policy input into the Action Plan planning process. Additional countywide consultation efforts are discussed in detail in the Alameda County section of the Consolidated Plan is an important document for the HOME Consortium.

The Pleasanton City Council served as the highest-level decision-making body for all matters related to the Consolidated Plan. The City Council holds public meetings twice monthly on the first and third Tuesday of the month. The City Council will meet on May 19, 2026, to: 1) review recommendations for HHSG funding from the HSC for projects to be included in the next Action Plan and solicit public comments, and 2) formally approve the Action Plan for FY 2026-2027 for submission to HUD prior to the June 3, 2026 submittal deadline.

Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).

The City’s General Plan Housing Element Update for the 2023-2031 planning period was adopted by the City Council on January 26, 2023 and certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. This recent Housing Element update process provided a significant opportunity for public input regarding goals, policies, and programs for the City’s future housing development. The Housing Element process was conducted in collaboration with Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. (LWC), a consultant specializing in the preparation of local housing elements. The process involved the following public events throughout 2021: 1) introductory meetings with the Planning Commission, Housing Commission, City Council, and the community; 2) stakeholders meeting with for- and non-profit housing developers, community and housing advocates, and local institutions, and businesses; 3) sites criteria meetings; 4) preliminary report meetings; 5) initial sites introduction meetings; 6) sites inventory meetings; 7) housing policy/program items meetings; 8) draft housing element meetings; 9)HCD comments and revisions meetings; and 10) adoption meetings. Stakeholder meetings involved participation from both non‐profit and for‐profit groups, including Tri-Valley Haven, Catholic Community of Pleasanton, Tri-Valley REACH, CityServe of the Tri-Valley, Goodness Village, Sunflower Hill, East Bay Housing Organization, Pleasanton VFW Post 6298, Greenbelt Alliance, Pleasanton Unified School District, East Bay for Everyone, and Open Heart Kitchen.

The City maintains an active database of potential interested parties and uses it to send out notification of grant funding opportunities at the beginning of every application cycle. The list currently includes approximately 250 nonprofit agencies, individuals, and other interested parties. In addition, ads are placed in local newspapersand on the City’s website.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
6 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness Stakeholders in Alameda County have been assessing the needs of persons experiencing homelessness and working to improve our response across the county since the founding of Alameda County-wide Homeless Continuum of Care Council in 1997. The collaboration includes cities and Alameda County government agencies representing three separate care systems — homeless services, HIV/AIDS services and mental health services — that share overlapping client populations. Alameda Countywide Homeless and Special Needs Housing Plan, known as the EveryOne Home plan and published in 2006, helped to form EveryOne Home into a community-based organization to implement the Plan and served as the County’s Continuum of Care.

EveryOne Home coordinates local efforts to address homelessness, seeks to maintain the existing service capacity, build new partnerships that generate greater resources for the continuum of housing, services, and employment, and establish inter-jurisdictional cooperation. EveryOne Home leverages substantial federal, state, and local resources for homeless housing and services, standardize data collection, and facilitate a year-round process of collaboration. EveryOne Home includes representation from HOME Consortium jurisdictions and CDBG entitlement jurisdictions in the County, service providers and advocates, homeless or formerly homeless persons, representatives of the faith community, business representatives, and education and health care professionals. EveryOne Home receives administrative funding through Alameda County’s General Fund as well as contributions from each of Alameda County’s jurisdictions.

The EveryOne Home plan is structured around three major goals: 1) preventing homelessness; 2) ensuring safer and more dignified conditions for those experiencing homelessness; and 3) increasing permanent homes.

In 2018, EveryOne Home updated that Plan now known as the Strategic Plan Update: Ending Homelessness in Alameda County. This Update recommends strategies and actions to reduce homelessness so that in five years no person without a permanent home would need to sleep outside.

The Update focuses on 1) preventing homelessness; 2) ensuring safer and more dignified conditions for those experiencing homelessness; and 3) increasing permanent homes. The EveryOne Home Governance Charter memorializes how stakeholders govern the collective impact initiative to end homelessness and meet the federally-defined responsibilities of operating a HUD Continuum of Care as found in the Continuum of Care Program Rule at §578 and its related HUD rules, regulations and notices, direct the work of the backbone organization, and promote partnership and accountability among the various leadership bodies.

The 5-year strategic initiative Home Together 2026 Community Plan centers on racial equity and identifies the strategies, activities, and resources needed to dramatically reduce homelessness in Alameda County.

The Plan identifies what is needed to operate a homeless response system that has the capacity to address the needs of people experiencing homelessness and to reduce racial disparities. A companion to

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
7 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
the Home Together Community Plan is the Alameda County’s Homelessness Prevention Framework which outlines the actions and resources needed to significantly prevent homelessness in Alameda County.

Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS
The City of Pleasanton is not an entitlement jurisdiction for ESG funding.

Alameda County Housing and Community Development Department through HMIS and leadership of the EveryOne Home Performance Management Committee supports the EveryOne Home initiative to establish system wide outcomes and to evaluate effectiveness of programs against those outcomes.

These outcomes include shortening the period of time homeless and reducing the recidivism rates for homeless people.

Consultation with EveryOne Home, the Alameda Countywide Continuum of Care, on the use of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds, began in early 2012, when representatives from the City of Berkeley, the City of Oakland, Alameda County Housing and Community Development Department (Urban County grantee), and EveryOne Home worked together to implement the new ESG requirements in a way that would be consistent county‐wide and would continue a collaboration which began in 2009 with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re‐housing (HPRP) funds. This collaboration resulted in the creation of Priority Home Partnership (PHP), which was a single county‐wide program to implement HPRP. EveryOne Home held a community‐wide meeting at which additional consultation and public input into the use of ESG funds was solicited. A series of meetings with EveryOne Home and the ESG grantees continues through the year and a coordinated ESG program was established and began implementation in early 2013. This coordinated program will use this same structure for FY25‐FY29 ESG funding.

2. Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process consultations.

See Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Table 2– Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization Alameda County Entitlement Jurisdictions Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government ‐ County Other government ‐ Local
Regional organization
Grantee Department
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs ‐ Chronically homeless Homeless
Needs ‐ Families with children Homelessness Needs
‐ Veterans Homelessness Needs ‐ Unaccompanied
youth Non‐Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti‐poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Alameda County and all of the cities in Alameda County
meet to discuss regional issues affecting all jurisdictions and to coordinate consultations. Many neighborhood
group were also consulted in preparing the Analysis of
Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice.
2 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority of the County of Alameda Agency/Group/Organization Type PHA
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
All Housing authorities in Alameda County (Oakland,
Berkeley, City of Alameda, Livermore and Alameda
County) participated in the planning and development of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice Plan.
3 Agency/Group/Organization City of Livermore
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government ‐ Local What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Economic Development
Human Services Needs Assessment
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
The cities of Livermore and Pleasanton collaborated to
conduct the Tri‐Valley Human Services Needs Assessment
in 2011. Pleasanton also adopted a Human Services Needs Assessment Strategic Plan 14‐16 and the HSNA Updated
Strategic Plan 2018‐2022. The 2024 Eastern Alameda
County Human Services Needs Assessment (EACHSNA)
evaluates the strengths, needs, and recommendations for the human services delivery network for the Tri-Valley
region and individual Tri-Valley cities.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
4 Agency/Group/Organization Abode Services, Inc.

Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services – Housing
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs – Chronically homeless
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.
5 Agency/Group/Organization Axis Community Health
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services – Health
Health Agency
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.
6 Agency/Group/Organization CityServe of the Tri-Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type Services – Housing
Services – Elderly Persons
Services – Persons with Disabilities
Services – Victims of Domestic Violence
Services – Homeless
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs – Chronically Homeless
Homeless Needs – Families with children
Homelessness Needs – Veterans
Homelessness Needs – Unaccompanied minors
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
7 Agency/Group/Organization Community Resources for Independent Living (CRIL) Agency/Group/Organization Type Services – Housing
Services – Persons with Disabilities
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.
8 Agency/Group/Organization Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity (ECHO Housing)
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services – Housing
Services – Homeless
Services – Fair Housing
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs – Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs – Families with children
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.
9 Agency/Group/Organization Eden I&RR
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services – homeless
Information and Referral
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Homeless Needs – Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs -Families with children
Homelessness Needs – Veterans
Homelessness Needs – Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
10 Agency/Group/Organization Legal Assistance for Seniors Agency/Group/Organization Type Services – Elderly Persons What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.
11 Agency/Group/Organization Open Heart Kitchen
Agency/Group/Organization Type Meals for children and seniors What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.
12 Agency/Group/Organization Spectrum Community Services Agency/Group/Organization Type Services – Elderly Persons Services – Persons with Disabilities
Meals for homebound seniors
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.
13 Agency/Group/Organization Tri-Valley Haven
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services – Housing
Services – Children
Services – Victims of Domestic Violence
Services - Homeless
What section of the Plan was addressed
by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment
Homeless Needs -Families with children
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes
of the consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Provided input in the development of the 2024 Eastern
Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment
(EACHSNA). The City coordinates with services providers to assess needs and establish ways to coordinate services on a regional level.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting Not applicable. Efforts were made to include as broad a group of community stakeholders as possible. No agency types were excluded from participation.

Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead
Organization
How do the goals of your Strategic
Plan overlap with the
goals of each plan?
Continuum of Care, includes
Home Together 2026
Community Plan
Alameda County Housing
and Homelessness
Services
Drives the development of the
homelessness activity goals.
2024 Alameda County Homeless
Point in Time Count
EveryOne Home Annual homeless population census
and analysis of addressing
homelessness in Alameda County.
2024 Eastern Alameda County
Human Services Needs
Assessment (EACHSNA)
Tri-Valley cities of Dublin,
Livermore, and
Pleasanton
EACHSNA evaluates the strengths,
needs, and recommendations for the
human services delivery network for
the Tri-Valley region and individual TriValley cities. 2025-2029 Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing
Choice (AI)
Alameda County Housing
and Community
Development
Department
The AI identified and evaluated
impediments to choosing housing free
of discrimination and included a 5-year
Housing Action Plan that recommends
actions to address the impediments.

Table 3 – Other local / regional / federal planning efforts

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-12 Participation - 91.401, 91.105, 91.200(c)

1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting Citizen Participation Outreach
Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance
Summary of
comments received
Summary of comments
not accepted
and reasons
URL (If
applicable)
1 Public Meeting Nontargeted/broad
community
Representatives from
16 agencies
submitted program
applications through
the City’s Request for
Qualifications (RFQ)
for the Housing and
Human Services
(HHSG) program for
FY 2026/2027.

None. Not applicable.

Table 1 – Citizen Participation Outreach

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP‐15 Expected Resources ‐ 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
This section provides a brief description of the federal CDBG and HOME funds available to implement the City’s FY 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan, which outlines the second year of the FY 2025‐2029 Consolidated Plan.

Anticipated Resources
Program Source
of
Funds
Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
$
Narrative
Annual Description
Allocation:
$
Program
Income:
$
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$
CDBG Public ‐
Federal
Acquisition
Admin &
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public
Services
$384,450 $0 $0 $384,450 $384,450 CDBG activities
will include
administration,
public services,
housing, and
other activities
benefiting low‐
mod income
households /
communities
in the City of
Pleasanton.

Table 1 ‐ Expected Resources – Priority Table

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
15 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied To maximize leveraging of its own funds and increase the funds available for housing and community development activities, the City of Pleasanton plans to undertake the following activities:
• Support applications by organizations or agencies for other public and private sources offinancing to leverage City funds.
• Include leveraging as a goal to the maximum extent possible in the City’s HHSG funding application review process.
• Support the purchase and rehabilitation and new construction of units by nonprofit housing developers.
• Promote private sector rehabilitation through the City’s Housing Rehabilitation Program (HRP). • Continue participation in programs to support affordable homeownership. • Continue to provide support to nonprofit, community‐based housing developers andservice providers in obtaining other sources of financing.
• Promote joint development with other governmental or quasi‐governmental agencies toimplement housing community development programs and combine multiple sources of financing.

Matching requirements must be satisfied in the following federal entitlement housing programs: the HOME Program and the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. A variety of non‐federal sources may be used for the HOME match requirements, which requires that $0.25 be “permanently contributed” to the HOME Program or to HOME‐assisted projects for every HOME dollar spent. This requirement applies to the program as a whole, not to individual projects. The liability for matching funds occurs when the HOME Consortium actually draws down HOME funds from HUD. Sources of HOME match include cash or cash equivalents from a non‐federal source, value of waived taxes or fees, value of donated land or real property, a portion of housing bond proceeds, and the cost of infrastructure improvements, among others.

As a member jurisdiction, the City must comply with the HOME match requirements that have been established by the County. The County will evaluate match requirements for HOME and determine potential match sources. Some match sources may come from local affordable housing trust funds, housing bond proceeds, the value of waived local fees or permits, foregone property tax revenue, local road funds, private donations, services funded by service providers, the State, County, or foundations, other local agency funds, and publicly owned land.

If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
The City has plans to identify strategies to leverage publicly owned land and properties to address the housing needs in its 2023-2031 Housing Element. The City is currently assessing its inventory of properties that could support affordable housing development and evaluating how the properties would comply with California’s Surplus Lands Act (AB 1486, AB 1255, and SB 6).

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Annual Goals and Objectives
AP‐20 Annual Goals and Objectives ‐ 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information
Sort
Order
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
1 Housing
Needs ‐
Rental
Assistance
2025 2029 Affordable
Housing
City-wide Housing
Needs
HOME:
$80,000
Tenant-based
rental
assistance:
6 Households
Assisted
2 Housing Needs
‐ Minor
Housing
Rehabilitation
Program
2025 2029 Affordable
Housing
City-wide Housing
Needs
HOME:
$71,250
Homeowner
Housing
Rehabilitated:
7 Households
Assisted
3 Housing 2025 2029 Affordable Housing LIHF Public service Needs ‐ Housing Needs activities for
Reduction of Low/Moderate
Housing Income
Discrimination Housing
Benefit:
10 Households
Assisted
4 Community
Development
Needs ‐
Capital
Improvements
2025 2029 Non‐Housing
Community
Development
Community
Development
Needs
CDBG:
$249,892
Other:
0 Other
5 Community
Development
Needs ‐ Public
Services
2025 2029 Non‐Housing
Community
Development
Community
Development
Needs
CDBG CDBG:
$57,667
Public service
activities other
than
Low/Moderate
Income
Housing
Benefit:
100 Persons
Assisted
Table 2 – Goals Summary

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
17 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name Housing Needs ‐ Rental Assistance
Goal Description Provide tenant-based rental assistance to eligible low-income individuals and families.
2 Goal Name Housing Needs ‐ Preservation ‐ Owner
Goal Description Promote the preservation of single‐family homes through rehabilitation or minor home repair.
3 Goal Name Housing Needs ‐ Reduction of Housing Discrimination Goal Description Reduce Housing Discrimination through provision of fair housing and landlord/tenant services.
4 Goal Name Community Development Needs ‐ Capital Improvements Goal Description Make improvements, including ADA accessibility, to public facilities, such as curbs and sidewalks, neighborhood parks and recreational improvements, and to non‐profit agency facilities.

Make annual principal and interest HUD Section 108 Loan repayments. 5 Goal Name Community Development Needs ‐ Public Services Goal Description Support public service programs for low income residents, preserving safety net services for families and individuals who are vulnerable or “in‐crisis”.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
18 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP‐35 Projects ‐ 91.420, 91.220(d)
Introduction
This section of the Action Plan includes the programs and activities which the City of Pleasanton will carry out to implement its Housing and Community Development Strategic Plan during FY2026/2027.

This section describes individual activities to be funded with FY2026/2027 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. The City’s use of HOME funding is addressed separately under the County’s section of the Consolidated Plan.

There are four (4) types of projects eligible for CDBG funds: capital improvement projects, economic development, housing, and public services. To be eligible for CDBG funding, projects must meet at least one (1) of HUD's national objectives: 1) to benefit low/moderate‐income people; 2) to prevent or eliminate slums and blight; and 3) to meet an urgent community development need.

CDBG‐funded projects must also pass the low‐ and moderate‐income benefit test. A project meets this standard if at least 51% of the beneficiaries have low‐moderate incomes (i.e., incomes at or below 80% of Area Median Income) or if the project benefits an area (e.g., census tracts, service area, neighborhood, etc.) with a majority of low‐moderate income people. Funded projects are required to document the income levels of persons and households receiving these services.

For FY 2026‐2027, the City is proposing to allocate its CDBG funds to the followingeligible funding categories: Public Services, Public Facilities, and General Administration. # Project Name
1 Spectrum Community Services – Meals on Wheels
2 Tri-Valley Haven Emergency Shelter Rebuild
3 City of Pleasanton Axis Section 108 Loan Repayment
4 City of Pleasanton Administration
Table 3 – Project Information
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Allocation priorities are based on the Consolidated Plan. There are a number of barriers to providing affordable housing in Pleasanton, based on real estate market and non‐market factors. Affordable housing projects are difficult to build due to the high cost of building materials. The cost and limited availability of land in Pleasanton contribute to high development costs. Affordable housing developments generally require multiple funding sources from public and private sources. HUD's cap of 15% of the allocation for public services is an obstacle for providing supportive services to homeless population, especially in smaller cities like Pleasanton which does not receive a significant allocation of CDBG funds.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
19 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP‐38 Project Summary
Project Summary Information
1 Project Name Spectrum Community Services ‐ Meals on Wheels Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Community Development Needs ‐ Public Services Needs Addressed Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $28,609
Description Spectrum plans to deliver more than 22,000 meals to 135 homebound, low‐income Pleasanton seniors
and disabled adults in FY 2025‐2026.

Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number and type of families
that will benefit from the proposed
activities
Spectrum will be delivering meals to 135
homebound, low‐income Pleasanton seniors
and disabled adults.

Location Description Spectrum will be delivering meals to homebound seniors throughout the City.

Planned Activities Spectrum will deliver 22,000 nutritional meals to 135 frail homebound, low‐income seniors and disabled
adults residing in Pleasanton.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
20 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
2 Project Name Tri-Valley Haven Emergency Shelter Rebuild Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Community Development Needs ‐
Capital Improvement
Needs Addressed Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $227,082
Description Tri-Valley Haven will demolish its existing emergency shelter due to structural problems and
other unhabitable conditions. Then it will rebuild
the shelter that will provide 45 beds, which is 50%
more capacity than the 30 beds provided by original
shelter. CDBG funds will be used for foundation
preparation, ground breaking, excavation, and
trenching costs.

Target Date 6/30/2027
Estimate the number and type of families
that will benefit from the proposed
activities
Tri-Valley Haven will have 45 beds once the
emergency shelter is constructed.

Location Description Confidential location.

Planned Activities Tri-Valley Haven plans to demolish an existing 30- bed emergency shelter and rebuild a new shelter
that will have 45 beds.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
21 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
3 Project Name City of Pleasanton Axis Section 108 Loan Repayment Target Area
Goals Supported Community Development Needs ‐ Capital Improvements Needs Addressed Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $23,316
Description Annual installment for repayment in FY 2025-2026 (City of Pleasanton portion) of the $950,000 Section 108 Loan from HUD for assisting in the acquisition of the Axis Community Health Clinic, in accordance to HUD's 20‐year repayment schedule.

Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number and
type of families that will
benefit from the proposed
activities
The Section 108 loan repayment does not directly benefit Pleasanton and Tri‐Valley residents, but Axis Community Health offers services from five sites, including the new clinic in the Tri‐ Valley area and serves more than 14,000 members of the
community.

Location Description Axis Community Health Clinic is located at 5925 West Las Positas Blvd., Suite 100, Pleasanton, CA 94588.

Planned Activities The Section 108 loan repayment is in accordance with HUD's 20‐ Year Repayment Plan with a full term in FY 2033‐2034.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
22 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
4 Project Name City of Pleasanton Administration
Target Area City-wide
Goals Supported Housing Needs ‐ Affordable Rental Housing Housing Needs ‐ Preservation ‐ Owner
Housing Needs ‐ Preservation ‐ Rental
Housing Needs ‐ First Time Homebuyer
Housing Needs ‐ Reduction of Housing
Discriminatio
Homeless Needs
Supportive Housing Needs
Community Development Needs ‐ Capital
Improvements
Community Development Needs ‐ Economic
Development
Community Development Needs ‐ Public Services
Needs Addressed Housing Needs
Homeless Needs
Supportive Housing Needs
Community Development Needs
Funding CDBG: $76,291
Description General administration and oversight of the City of Pleasanton's CDBG program in FY 2025-2026.

Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number and type of families
that will benefit from the proposed
activities
Location Description The Housing Division for the City of Pleasanton is located at 200 Old Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton, CA
94566.

Planned Activities City staff will administer the CDBG Program in accordance to HUD CDBG regulations.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
23 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP‐50 Geographic Distribution ‐ 91.420, 91.220(f)
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low‐incomeand minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The City of Pleasanton receives an allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, which may be used for eligible activities, eligible households, and/or eligible areas within its jurisdiction.

The CDBG funds are allocated according to a formula based on population data from the 2010 Census and the number of substandard units in each jurisdiction. All projects listed in the “Proposed Projects” tables are intended and open to serve eligible households within the City of Pleasanton. Census tracts that are located completely or partially within the current Pleasanton city limits are as follows: 4506.01, 4506.02, 4506.03, 4506.04, 4506.05, 4506.06, 4506.07, 4506.43, 4506.46, 4507.01, 4507.41, 4507.42, 4507.44, and 4507.45.

Geographic Distribution
Target Area Percentage of Funds
Citywide 100
Table 8 ‐ Geographic Distribution
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Geography was not used to determine funding allocation priorities.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
24 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing -91.420, 91.220(j) Introduction
This section includes the actions planned by the City of Pleasanton during the FY 2026/27 to reduce barriers to affordable housing.

Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment
The City of Pleasanton is an active member of the Alameda County HOME Consortium. In 2010, the Consortium completed an updated Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing as part of its fair housing planning program. The HOME Consortium Analysis of Impediments includes demographic information for each jurisdiction, an evaluation of each jurisdiction's fair housing status, a description of public and private impediments to fair housing choice, and an assessment of current public and private fair housing programs. The HOME Consortium will be updating the AI in accordance to HUD’s new regulations.

The City provides fair housing and housing counseling services to area residents through a contract with ECHO Housing. The City's funding is high on a per-capita basis relative to other communities, and the majority of this service is paid for with local rather than HUD funds. ECHO Housing's services include investigation of housing discrimination complaints as well as educational seminars for housing managers, owners, realtors, and tenants. City staff works with ECHO Housing to address identified impediments. In addition to the general services provide through the City's contract with ECHO Housing, the City has been active in the following areas:
• The City has supported a variety of grass-roots efforts over the past decade that have resulted in the construction of new, affordable housing for a wide spectrum of housing needs in the community (family rental, senior, first-time home buyer, disabled, and other special needs). The majority of these efforts have involved local funds.
• The City sponsors, through an annual contribution of local funds, the efforts of the East Bay Housing Organization (EBHO) public education campaign to address local opposition to and misperceptions of affordable housing.
• The City has collaborated extensively with its neighbor city, Livermore, on housing programs and issues of shared concern (e.g., Sojourner House emergency shelter). The cities, as well as the City of Dublin, collaborated to secure a Section 108 Loan to assist in financing the construction of the Axis Community Health Clinic in Pleasanton.
• The City has supported an extensive Housing Rehabilitation Program. The City and its program administrator Habitat for Humanity will continue to outreach to minority and women contractors as well as local business enterprises.
• The City has used local, State, and HOME funds to construct and or acquire and rehabilitate housing

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
25 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
units for rental by persons with physical, mental, and developmental disabilities. • In 1999, Pleasanton helped establish the Tri-Valley Housing Scholarship Program which offers tenantbased rental assistance to households that are homeless or at risk of being homeless. Subsidies are provided while the head of household is undergoing job training. Over 90% of households served are headed by female heads of households, and the majority of clients have been minority households. This program was recently revamped into the Tri-Valley Rapid Rehousing Program to assist all income-eligible households.

Discussion
Funding. One of the significant barriers to affordable housing in Pleasanton and the surrounding region is the high cost of developing and maintaining affordable housing. The City of Pleasanton will apply CDBG, HOME, and City Lower Income Housing Funds toward affordable housing projects and programs in FY 2024/25. The City will continue to monitor the availability of specialized grants for housing development and will utilize its Lower Income Housing Fund to finance activities promoting affordable housing.

Land Costs. The City does not have ownership of any significant parcels of land at the present time. Therefore, the market cost of land is posing an ongoing constraint to new affordable housing development in which the City has direct involvement. However, the City has worked and will continue to work with individual developers and with the owners of large land holdings to attempt to reserve additional sites for affordable housing development during the five-year Strategic Plan period. The City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance provides the option of land dedication in lieu of providing affordable housing units. The City’s certified Housing Element Update 2024-2031 may provide additional land ownership opportunities that can be utilized to create new affordable housing.

Housing Development Costs. The City will continue to work to offset the costs of housing development by waiving certain City fees for affordable rental and ownership housing units and by providing various types of subsidies through the use of its Lower Income Housing Fund. The example was cited earlier in this report of extensive fee waivers that have been granted in the past to defray development costs and promote affordable housing construction.

Community Perceptions of Affordable Housing. A continuing impediment to affordable housing development is the negative perception of affordable housing held by many members of the public. The City provides local funds annually to East Bay Housing Organizations (EBHO) to implement an ongoing program aimed at improving residents’ perceptions and understanding of affordable housing.

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
26 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP‐85 Other Actions ‐ 91.420, 91.220(k)
Introduction
The City will pursue the following planned actions in order to undertake the strategies outlined in Pleasanton’s FY 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan.

Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The primary obstacle to meeting the underserved needs in Pleasanton is securing adequate funding resources. The priority needs highlighted in its FY 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan are designed to address the underserved needs within the Pleasanton jurisdictional boundaries.

Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The primary gaps facing Pleasanton, as well as its neighbor cities, in delivering affordable andsupportive housing are primarily the lack of financial resources (including land) for development, operations, and support services combined with a location that has the highest costs in the region. The City will continue to coordinate and collaborate with the Alameda County HOME Consortium, with Alameda County as the lead agency, to utilize federal HOME funds for acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of affordable rental housing; tenant‐based rental assistance; and single‐family and multi‐ rental housing rehabilitation or minor repairs.

The City will continue to contract with the “housing services” non‐profit agencies that have been recipients of Housing & Human Services Grant (HHSG) program funds. These agencies provide housing services that help maintain people in housing and prevent homelessness.

The City’s Housing Rehabilitation Program provide rehabilitation and minor home repair grants or loans for income –eligible homeowners. The program have historically preserved and improved the City’s existing stock for extremely low‐ and very low‐income homeowners. The City is also assessing extending the Housing Rehabilitation Program to income‐eligible renters with disabilities to make accessibility improvements in their rental housing units.

Lastly, the City will continue to monitor its affordable housing portfolio that include more than 1,000 rental housing units and more than 100 homeownership units.

Actions planned to reduce lead‐based paint hazards
No new programs are being considered for the five‐year period to reduce lead‐based paint hazards inasmuch as the City's housing stock is generally young (post‐1978) and in good condition. Mitigations are currently implemented on an as-needed basis in conjunction with County-administered Housing Rehabilitation and Minor Home Repair Program activities. The City is not currently a party to the joint powers agreement, which established Alameda County's existing lead abatement program. However, Pleasanton is likely to increase its involvement in lead-based paint hazard reduction as involvement in housing rehabilitation programs increases in the future. The City will continue its collaboration with the

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
27 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Alameda County Lead Hazard Prevention Program on marketing and outreach efforts in the Tri‐Valley area.

Through its subrecipients of federal funds, the City conducts lead-based paint inspections on tenant-based rental assistance for HOME units built before 1978 as required as part of the Uniform Physical Condition Standards (UPCS) inspections which replaced the Housing Quality Standard (HQS) Inspections. Lead inspections are also conducted as a part of any grants or loans for owner-occupied or rental units funded through the City’s Housing Rehabilitation Program.

Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty‐level families Many collaboration efforts are coordinated at the County level. The Shelter Plus Care and the Supportive Housing Program serve the homeless through housing rental assistance and supportive services and aim to reduce the number of people living in poverty in the County. Consortium jurisdictions are working to implement the EveryOne Home Plan, which includes representatives from local jurisdictions, service providers and advocates, homeless or formerly homeless persons, representatives of the faith community, business and labor representatives, education and health care professionals.

The Workforce Investment Board emphasizes private sector, employer‐driven job training programs. The Alameda County Self‐Sufficiency Program is designed to operate as a single, integrated system for the delivery of work‐first, employment focused services. It complies with federal Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) and Food Stamp Employment and Training requirements and incorporates CalWorks program services and activities. The Self‐Sufficiency Centers provide employment services, transportation, child care, drug and alcohol abuse treatment and mental health services to help individuals comply with their welfare–to‐work plans. The program encourages community partnerships to leverage and maximize funds, prevent duplication of service delivery, and develop the capacity of the community to sustain a safety‐net for an expanding population.

Actions planned to develop institutional structure
The primary gaps facing Pleasanton and its neighbor cities in delivering affordable and supportive housing are primarily the lack of financial resources (including land) for development, operations, and support services combined with a location that has the highest costs in the region. Community development efforts are frequently limited due to a lack of financial resources. In some cases, there is need for stronger coordination between agencies and organizations although it is generally felt that the region enjoys a high level of coordination and simply needs to continue to foster and expand existing collaborative relationships.

Addressing gaps will continue to be a high priority for Pleasanton. The City will continue its efforts to identify and utilize new sources of financing for affordable housing, supportive housing, and community development programs; and enhance coordination efforts among housing providers, service providers, and governmental agencies. The City has streamlined and improved the process for selecting and funding housing and community development projects for its HOME and CDBG programs. In addition, the City has participated in the larger homeless and special needs housing initiatives (the EveryOne Home Plan and the annual Continuum of Care funding process) to select priorities and projects for homeless and special needs

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
28 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
funding.

Planned actions to develop institutional structure are listed in Section SP‐40 Institutional Delivery Structure.

The City will continue to collaborate and coordinate with public agencies, for profit and non‐ profit private organizations to critically contribute to the development of affordable housing, provision of social services, undertake capital improvements, and pursue economic development.

Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies
See above.

Discussion
N/A

CITY OF PLEASANTON
Annual Action Plan
2026
29 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Program Specific Requirements AP‐
90 Program Specific Requirements ‐ 91.420, 91.220(l)(1,2,4) Introduction
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.

1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before $0 the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed

2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be $0 used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan

3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements $0

4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit forwhich the $0 planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan.

5. The amount of income from float‐funded activities $0 Total Program Income $0
Other CDBG Requirements

1. The amount of urgent need activities $0

2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit ‐ A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of lowand moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this AnnualAction Plan. 100.00% Discussion
Not applicable.

Attachments
Grantee SF‐424’s and Certification(s)

OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 03/31/2029
* 1. Type of Submission: * 2. Type of Application:
* 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier:
5a. Federal Entity Identifier: 5b. Federal Award Identifier:

6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier:
* a. Legal Name:
* b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): * c. UEI:
* Street1:

Street2:
* City:

County/Parish:
* State:

Province:
* Country:
* Zip / Postal Code:

Department Name: Division Name:

Prefix: * First Name:

Middle Name:
* Last Name:

Suffix:

Title:

Organizational Affiliation:
* Telephone Number: Fax Number:
* Email:
* If Revision, select appropriate letter(s):
* Other (Specify):

State Use Only:

8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
d. Address:
e. Organizational Unit:
f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
Preapplication
Application
Changed/Corrected Application
New
Continuation
Revision

04.03.2026 CA62826 Pleasanton City
CA62826 Pleasanton City
94-6000397 ZQLCND5KBU99
P.O. Box
(123 Main Street)
Pleasanton
Alameda
CA: California
USA: UNITED STATES
94566-0802
Community Development Housing
Steve
Hernandez
Housing Manager
City of Pleasanton
925-931-5007
[email protected]

Applicant and Recipient
Assurances and Certifications
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development
OMB Number: 2501-0044
Expiration Date: 02/28/2027
Instructions for the HUD-424-B Assurances and Certifications As part of your application for HUD funding, you, as the official authorized to sign on behalf of your organization or as an individual, must provide the following assurances and certifications, which replace any requirement to submit an SF-424-B or SF-424-D. The Responsible Civil Rights Official has specified this form for use for purposes of general compliance with 24 CFR §§ 1.5, 3.115, 8.50, and 146.25, as applicable. The Responsible Civil Rights Official may require specific civil rights assurances to be furnished consistent with those authorities and will specify the form on which such assurances must be made. A failure to furnish or comply with the civil rights assurances contained in this form may result in the procedures to effect compliance at 24 CFR §§ 1.8, 3.115, 8.57, or 146.39.

By submitting this form, you are stating that all assertions made in this form are true, accurate, and correct.

As the duly representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant:
*Authorized Representative Name:

Prefix: Mr. *First Name: Gerry
Middle Name:
*Last Name: Beaudin
Suffix:
*Title: City Manager
*Applicant Organization: City of Pleasanton

1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, has the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds to pay the non-Federal share of program costs) to plan, manage and complete the program as
described in the application and the governing body has duly authorized the submission of the application, including these assurances and certifications, and authorized me as the official representative of the application to act in connection with the application and to provide any additional information as may be required.

2. Will administer the grant in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C 2000(d)) and
implementing regulations (24 CFR part 1), which provide that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subject to
discrimination under any program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance OR if the applicant is a
Federally recognized Indian tribe or its tribally designated housing entity, is subject to the Indian Civil Rights Act (25 U.S.C. 1301-1303).

3. Will administer the grant in compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as
amended, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 8, the American Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et.seq.), and implementing regulations at 28 CFR part 35 or 36, as applicable, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42
U.S.C. 6101-07) as amended, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 146 which together provide that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of disability or age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any
program or activity that receives Federal financial
assistance; except if the grant program authorizes or limits participation to designated populations, then the applicant will comply with the nondiscrimination requirements within the designated population.

4. Will comply with the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-19), as amended, and the implementing regulations at 24
CFR part 100, which prohibit discrimination in housing on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin and will affirmatively further fair housing; except an applicant which is an Indian tribe or its instrumentality which is excluded by statute from coverage does not make this certification; and further except if the grant program
authorizes or limits participation to designated populations, then the applicant will comply with the nondiscrimination requirements within the designated population.

5. Will comply with all applicable Federal
nondiscrimination requirements, including those listed at 24 CFR §§ 5.105(a) and 5.106 as applicable.

6. Will not use Federal funding to promote diversity,
equity, and inclusion (DEI) mandates, policies, programs, or activities that violate any applicable Federal antidiscrimination laws.

7. Will comply with the acquisition and relocation
requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601) and implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 24 and, as applicable, Section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5304(d))
and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 42, subpart A.

8. Will comply with the environmental requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et.seq.) and related Federal authorities prior to the commitment or expenditure of funds for property.

9. That no Federal appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid, by or on behalf of the applicant, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, and officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress, in connection with the awarding of this Federal grant or its extension, renewal, amendment or modification.

If funds other than Federal appropriated funds have or will be paid for influencing or attempting to influence the persons listed above, I shall complete and submit Standard FormLLL, Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying. I certify that I shall require all subawards at all tiers (including sub-grants and contracts) to similarly certify and disclose accordingly.

Federally recognized Indian Tribes and tribally designated housing entities (TDHEs) established by Federallyrecognized Indian tribes as a result of the exercise of the tribe’s sovereign power are excluded from coverage by the Byrd Amendment, but State-recognized Indian tribes and
TDHEs established under State law are not excluded from the statute’s coverage.

I/We, the undersigned, certify under penalty of perjury that the information provided above is true, accurate, and correct.

WARNING: Anyone who knowingly submits a false claim or makes a false statement is subject to criminal and/or civil penalties, including confinement for up to 5 years, fines, and civil and administrative penalties. (18 U.S.C. §§287, 1001, 1010, 1012, 1014; 31 U.S.C. §3729, 3802; 24 CFR §28.10(b)(1)(iii)).
*Signature: *Date:

Form HUD-424-B (02/23)

* 9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:

Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:

Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:
* Other (specify):
* 10. Name of Federal Agency:

11. Assistance Listing Number:

Assistance Listing Title:
* 12. Funding Opportunity Number:
* Title:

13. Competition Identification Number:

Title:

14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.):
* 15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project:

Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions.

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
C: City or Township Government
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

14.218
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
CDBG Application for FY 2026/2027 for the City of Pleasanton, California.

Add Attachments Delete Attachments View Attachments
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment

* a. Federal
* b. Applicant
* c. State
* d. Local
* e. Other
* f. Program Income
* g. TOTAL
.

Prefix: * First Name:

Middle Name:
* Last Name:

Suffix:
* Title:
* Telephone Number:
* Email:

Fax Number:
* Signature of Authorized Representative: * Date Signed:

18. Estimated Funding ($):

21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) ** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions.

Authorized Representative:

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
* a. Applicant
Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed. * b. Program/Project
* a. Start Date: * b. End Date:

16. Congressional Districts Of:

17. Proposed Project:
14 14
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
07/01/2026 06/30/2027
384,450.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 384,450.00
a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

Yes No
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
** I AGREE
Mr. Gerry
Beaudin
City Manager
925-931-5002
[email protected]
* 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.) * 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? If "Yes", provide explanation and attach

CERTIFICATIONS
In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan regulations, the jurisdiction certifies that:

Affirmatively Further Fair Housing --The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing.

Uniform Relocation Act and Anti-displacement and Relocation Plan -- It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 4601-4655) and implementing regulations at 49 CFR Part 24. It has in effect and is following a residential anti-displacement and relocation assistance plan required under 24 CFR Part 42 in connection with any activity assisted with funding under the Community Development Block Grant or HOME programs.

Anti-Lobbying --To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and

3. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti-lobbying certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

Authority of Jurisdiction --The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law (as applicable) and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations.

Consistency with plan --The housing activities to be undertaken with Community Development Block Grant, HOME, Emergency Solutions Grant, and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS funds are consistent with the strategic plan in the jurisdiction’s consolidated plan.

Section 3 -- It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 75.

Signature of Authorized Official Date
Title

Specific Community Development Block Grant Certifications The Entitlement Community certifies that:

Citizen Participation -- It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105.

Community Development Plan -- Its consolidated plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-term community development objectives that that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective of the CDBG program (i.e., the development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and expanding economic opportunities, primarily for persons of low and moderate income) and requirements of 24 CFR Parts 91 and 570.

Following a Plan -- It is following a current consolidated plan that has been approved by HUD.

Use of Funds -- It has complied with the following criteria:

1. Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds, it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low- and moderate-income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include CDBG-assisted activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available (see Optional CDBG Certification).

2. Overall Benefit. The aggregate use of CDBG funds, including Section 108 guaranteed loans, during program year(s) _________________________[a period specified by the grantee of one, two, or three specific consecutive program years], shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period.

3. Special Assessments. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds, by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements.

However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds.

In addition, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate-income (not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment.

Excessive Force -- It has adopted and is enforcing:

1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and

2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction.
2026

Compliance with Anti-discrimination laws -- The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) and the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-3619) and implementing regulations.

Lead-Based Paint -- Its activities concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 35, Subparts A, B, J, K and R.

Compliance with Laws -- It will comply with applicable laws.

Signature of Authorized Official Date
Title

OPTIONAL Community Development Block Grant Certification Submit the following certification only when one or more of the activities in the action plan are designed to meet other community development needs having particular urgency as specified in 24 CFR 570.208(c):

The grantee hereby certifies that the Annual Plan includes one or more specifically identified CDBGassisted activities which are designed to meet other community development needs having particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available to meet such needs.

Signature of Authorized Official Date
Title

Specific HOME Certifications
The HOME participating jurisdiction certifies that:

Tenant Based Rental Assistance -- If it plans to provide tenant-based rental assistance, the tenant-based rental assistance is an essential element of its consolidated plan.

Eligible Activities and Costs -- It is using and will use HOME funds for eligible activities and costs, as described in 24 CFR §§92.205 through 92.209 and that it is not using and will not use HOME funds for prohibited activities, as described in §92.214.

Subsidy layering -- Before committing any funds to a project, it will evaluate the project in accordance with the guidelines that it adopts for this purpose and will not invest any more HOME funds in combination with other Federal assistance than is necessary to provide affordable housing; Signature of Authorized Official Date
Title

Emergency Solutions Grants Certifications
The Emergency Solutions Grants Program recipient certifies that:

Major rehabilitation/conversion/renovation – If an emergency shelter’s rehabilitation costs exceed 75 percent of the value of the building before rehabilitation, the recipient will maintain the building as a shelter for homeless individuals and families for a minimum of 10 years after the date the building is first occupied by a homeless individual or family after the completed rehabilitation.

If the cost to convert a building into an emergency shelter exceeds 75 percent of the value of the building after conversion, the recipient will maintain the building as a shelter for homeless individuals and families for a minimum of 10 years after the date the building is first occupied by a homeless individual or family after the completed conversion.

In all other cases where ESG funds are used for renovation, the recipient will maintain the building as a shelter for homeless individuals and families for a minimum of 3 years after the date the building is first occupied by a homeless individual or family after the completed renovation.

Essential Services and Operating Costs – In the case of assistance involving shelter operations or essential services related to street outreach or emergency shelter, the recipient will provide services or shelter to homeless individuals and families for the period during which the ESG assistance is provided, without regard to a particular site or structure, so long the recipient serves the same type of persons (e.g., families with children, unaccompanied youth, disabled individuals, or victims of domestic violence) or persons in the same geographic area.

Renovation – Any renovation carried out with ESG assistance shall be sufficient to ensure that the building involved is safe and sanitary.

Supportive Services – The recipient will assist homeless individuals in obtaining permanent housing, appropriate supportive services (including medical and mental health treatment, victim services, counseling, supervision, and other services essential for achieving independent living), and other Federal State, local, and private assistance available for these individuals.

Matching Funds – The recipient will obtain matching amounts required under 24 CFR 576.201.

Confidentiality – The recipient has established and is implementing procedures to ensure the confidentiality of records pertaining to any individual provided family violence prevention or treatment services under any project assisted under the ESG program, including protection against the release of the address or location of any family violence shelter project, except with the written authorization of the person responsible for the operation of that shelter.

Homeless Persons Involvement – To the maximum extent practicable, the recipient will involve, through employment, volunteer services, or otherwise, homeless individuals and families in constructing, renovating, maintaining, and operating facilities assisted under the ESG program, in providing services assisted under the ESG program, and in providing services for occupants of facilities assisted under the program.

Consolidated Plan – All activities the recipient undertakes with assistance under ESG are consistent with its consolidated plan.

Discharge Policy – The recipient will establish and implement, to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, policies and protocols for the discharge of persons from publicly funded institutions or systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care or other youth facilities, or correction programs and institutions) in order to prevent this discharge from immediately resulting in homelessness for these persons.

Signature of Authorized Official Date
Title

Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS Certifications The HOPWA grantee certifies that:

Activities -- Activities funded under the program will meet urgent needs that are not being met by available public and private sources.

Building -- Any building or structure assisted under that program shall be operated for the purpose specified in the consolidated plan:

1. For a period of not less than 10 years in the case of assistance involving new construction, substantial rehabilitation, or acquisition of a facility,

2. For a period of not less than 3 years in the case of assistance involving non-substantial rehabilitation or repair of a building or structure.

Signature of Authorized Official Date
Title

APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS
INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LOBBYING CERTIFICATION:

Lobbying Certification
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

Item #7

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
May 19, 2026
Finance
TITLE: ACCEPT THE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR MARCH 2026

SUMMARY
Attached is the City of Pleasanton monthly disbursement and investment report for March 2026.

RECOMMENDATION
Accept claim disbursements in the amount of $17,639,998 and the investment report for the month of March 2026.

BACKGROUND
The City's Investment Policy requires the Director of Finance to submit a monthly transaction report to the City Council within 60 days of the end of the reporting period in accordance with California Government Code Section 53607.

The Investment Policy also requires the Director of Finance to submit a quarterly report to the City Council on the status of the City's investment portfolio no later than 45 days after the end of each month. This report shall include the types of investments, the amount of money invested with various institutions, purchase and maturity dates, and yield on investments. The Director of Finance affirms that the investment portfolio complies with the investment policy and will meet cash flow needs for the next six months. This report also includes check and electronic payment information for March 2026.

DISCUSSION
The City has transitioned to a new reporting format to incorporate Chandler Asset Management's Investment Report. The average market yield and the ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index (benchmark) will be used for reporting purposes, replacing the effective rate of return/actual return on investment and the US Treasury Rates used in previous reports. It should be noted that the average market yield may be higher or lower than the actual return on investment.

The market value of the City of Pleasanton's primary investment portfolio increased by $10.8 million from $249.5 million to $260.3 million during the quarter ending March 31, 2026; the cost value increased by $11.1 million from $250.1 million to $261.2. The increase was mainly due to revenue from property tax. A portion of the City's investment portfolio is managed by Chandler Asset Management. The market value increased by $0.8 million, from $192.4 million to $193.2 million, during the quarter. The average market yield for the portfolio managed by Chandler Asset Management is 3.98 percent, with the average days to maturity (ADM) of 939 days as of March 31, 2026. The City's average market yield is slightly higher than the 3.84 percent for ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index.

Local Agency Investment Fund
The City's investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) increased to $66.5 million from $56.5 million last quarter ending December 31, 2025. The quarterly LAIF apportionment interest rate was 3.98 percent with an ADM of 261 days. The average monthly effective yield was 3.83 percent in March, 3.87 percent in February, and 3.93 percent in January. The average monthly effective yield for the nine months ended March 31, 2026 is 4.07 percent.

The returns for the two Certificates of Deposit with Fremont Bank and United Business Bank are 3.30 percent and 4.15 percent, respectively.

Asset Composition
As of March 31, 2026, approximately 17.5 percent of the total portfolio consisted of Federal Agency Issues, while the LAIF Investment was 25.5 percent of the portfolio. Corporate Notes accounted for 15.4 percent of the portfolio, Treasury Securities 36.6 percent, Government Money Market and Cash 0.2 percent, Supranationals 1.2 percent, Asset-Backed Securities 3.4 percent, and Certificates of Deposit 0.2 percent.

Table 1. Asset Composition
As of March 31, 2026, the entire portfolio, exclusive of CDs and LAIF was held in third-party safekeeping for the benefit of the City of Pleasanton at Bank of New York Mellon. Bank of New York Mellon is a contractual agent for the City.

As of March 31, 2026, all investments in the portfolio are authorized by State of California Government Section 53600 et. Seq. and the City's investment policy.

Economic Update Highlights
The following are some highlights from the Economic Update included in the Investment Report prepared by Chandler Asset Management in Attachment 1.

The Federal Reserve has held the funds rate at 3.50–3.75% and is signaling a cautionary stance, keeping open the option of delaying cuts if oil-related inflation proves persistent rather than transitory. As the data flow normalizes, the Chandler team anticipates additional yield curve steepening as the Federal Reserve gradually guides the policy rate toward a more

neutral range. The Federal Reserve’s March dot plot still projects one cut this year, yet the Iran-driven energy shock has narrowed the path toward easing. The Federal Reserve’s March 2026 FOMC meeting ended with policymakers again holding the target range at 3.50%–3.75%, as the Committee maintained its pause following three late-2025 rate cuts.

Securities rated below "AA-/AA3"
Table 2. Securities rated below "AA-/AA3"
Purchases, Maturities, and Sales

During the quarter, the City's investment manager, Chandler Asset Management, purchased and sold securities on behalf of the City. Several securities matured during the quarter. Details for the purchases, maturity and sales are found in Attachment 1, Investment Report, Transaction Ledger. Certain securities were sold at a loss with the intent of reinvesting the funds with higher yields, as these securities were purchased before COVID with much lower yields. Staff will continue to monitor cash inflows and outflows, taking into consideration anticipated construction costs for large capital projects and unexpected events.

Below is a listing of Certificate of Deposit activity that occurred during the quarter ending March 31, 2026. For activity related to the City’s Chandler Asset Management managed account, refer to Attachment 1, Investment Report, Transaction Ledger.

Table 3. Certificate of Deposit Purchases and Maturities Section 115 Trust Fund
In December 2018, the City Council approved investing $28.0 million from various reserves into a Section 115 Trust Fund to help smooth the City's growing pension liabilities. The investment is made in two separate portfolios: the first for $6.7 million in a Conservative portfolio, which is available to pay the annual unfunded liabilities if necessary, and the second for $21.3 million in a long-term Capital Growth portfolio.

In February 2020, the City Council authorized staff to deposit, and withdraw from, the Conservative portfolio an additional amount up to the total annual required CalPERS payment.

In March and December 2020, two additional $5.0 million contributions were deposited into the Conservative portfolio for a total of $16.7 million.

As presented in the chart below, the Conservative portfolio balance was $21.6 million at the end of March 31, 2026, a slight increase of $0.01 million from the prior quarter. The Conservative portfolio investment return for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, was 0.15 percent, and the five-year annualized return was 3.71 percent.

Table 4. Conservative PARS Plan Account Balance

The second portfolio (Capital Growth) addresses the longer-term pension liabilities with an initial investment of $21.6 million. The focus of this portfolio is to earn a higher rate of return over the next 10 years or so before the City needs to draw upon it.

Table 5. Captial Growth PARS Plan Account Balance
The Capital Growth portfolio balance was $38.0 million at the end of March 31, 2026, a decrease of $0.4 million from the prior quarter. The Capital Growth portfolio quarterly investment return was -0.87 percent, and the five-year annualized return was 6.84 percent.

The two portfolios total $59.6 million, which are held by a third party for the benefit of the City of Pleasanton at US Bank. US Bank is the contractual agent for PARS trust investments that are managed by PFM Asset Management (formerly Highmark Capital Management).

EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Not applicable, as this item is a routine administrative matter of City Business.

OUTREACH
No outreach was conducted, as this item is a routine administrative matter of City Business.

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Not applicable, as this item is a routine administrative matter.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with acceptance of this report.

Prepared by: Submitted by: Approved by:

Minh Nguyen, Junior
Accountant
Susan Hsieh, Director of Finance Gerry Beaudin, City
Manager
Attachments:

1. Disbursements & Investment Report

Attachment 1
March 2026 DISBURSEMENTS
CHECK REGISTER*

DATE CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT
3/2/2026 85904 $ 1,102
3/5/2026 85905-86056 3,286,901
3/12/2026 86087-86223 851,585
3/19/2026 86240-86418 2,185,669
3/26/2026 86426-86526 1,036,493
3/27/2026 86527 357,599
$ 7,719,349

ACH PAYMENTS

DATE CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT
3/6/2026 86057-86075 1,353,326 $
3/12/2026 86076-86086 2,821,410
3/19/2026 86224-86239 226,388
3/26/2026 86419-86425 343,082
Water Revenue Bond Debt ACH Payment 691,875
Payroll & Tax Related ACH Payments 901,875
$ 6,337,956

WIRE TRANSFERS

DATE AMOUNT
$ -

PAYROLL TRANSFERS

DATE AMOUNT
3/5/2026 1,833,104 $
3/19/2026 1,749,590
$ 3,582,694
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $ 17,639,998
* Detailed registers available upon request.

INVESTMENT REPORT
City of Pleasanton | As of March 31, 2026
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT | chandlerasset.com
Chandler Team:

For questions about your account, please call (800) 317-4747, or contact [email protected]
Information contained herein is confidential. We urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Please see Important Disclosures at the end of the statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ECONOMIC UPDATE

ACCOUNT PROFILE

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

TRANSACTIONS
1

ECONOMIC UPDATE
2

▪
▪
▪
March payrolls rebounded by 178,000 after February’s revised 133,000 decline, but the war in Iran and its disruption of the Strait of Hormuz have pushed crude oil above $112, injecting a potential inflationary shock into an economy contending with sticky core prices above 3%.

The Federal Reserve has held the funds rate at 3.50–3.75% and is signaling a cautionary stance, keeping open the option of delaying cuts if oil‑related inflation proves persistent rather than transitory. As the data flow normalizes, the Chandler team anticipates additional yield curve steepening as the Federal Reserve gradually guides the policy rate toward a more neutral range. The Federal Reserve’s March dot plot still projects one cut this year, yet the Iran-driven energy shock has narrowed the path toward easing.

The Federal Reserve’s March 2026 FOMC meeting ended with policymakers again holding the target range at 3.50%–3.75%, as the Committee maintained its pause following three late‑2025 rate cuts. Governor Stephen Miran dissented in favor of an additional quarter‑point reduction, while Christopher Waller joined the majority, tipping the vote 11–1 to leave the benchmark rate unchanged.

Meanwhile, President Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as chair has hit a roadblock after a Republican senator vowed to block Warsh’s confirmation amid the Justice Department’s ongoing probe of the central bank.

Treasury yields exhibited considerable first-quarter volatility as the Iran conflict injected energy-driven inflation fears into a market grappling with sticky core prices. At March month-end, the 2-year yield stood at 3.79%, up 32 basis points year-to-date, the 10-year at

4.32%, and the 30-year at 4.86%. The 2-year to 10-year spread narrowed to 52 basis points, reflecting pronounced flattening as short rates rose faster than longer maturities. One year ago, that spread stood near 32 basis points, providing context on normalization since the 2022 through 2024 yield curve inversion. The 3-month to 10-year spread was approximately 64 basis points at March month-end.

ECONOMIC UPDATE
3

-400
-200
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
MOM Change In Thousands (000's)
Nonfarm Payroll (000's)
Non-farm Payroll (000's)
3-month average (000's)

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%
Unemployment Rate
Underemployment Rate (U6)
Unemployment Rate (U3)
Rate (%)
March nonfarm payrolls rose by 178,000, a decisive reversal from February’s revised 133,000 decline that had been distorted by a Kaiser Permanente strike affecting over 30,000 healthcare workers and severe winter weather. Healthcare contributed 76,000 positions as striking nurses returned, while construction and leisure rebounded from weather-induced troughs. The unemployment rate edged lower to

4.3%, though partly from a labor force reduction rather than a hiring acceleration. Meanwhile, the underemployment rate edged up to

8.0% from 7.9% in February. Average hourly earnings rose 0.2% over the month and 3.5% year over year—the slowest annual pace since May 2021.

Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor

EMPLOYMENT
4

0 2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Job Openings
Recession
Historical Average In Thousands (000's) Job openings fell to 6.9 million in February from a revised 7.2 million in January, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. The ratio of openings to unemployed workers slipped to 0.9, reinforcing the gradual rebalancing of demand and supply. Hires decreased to 4.8 million, the lowest since April 2020, suggesting employers have grown selective about adding headcount. Quits were little changed at 3 million. The data reflects a labor market consistent with the Federal Reserve’s characterization of a no-hire, no-fire environment.

Source: US Department of Labor

JOB OPENINGS & LABOR TURNOVER SURVEY
5

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
CPI YOY % Change
Core CPI YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%
Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE)
PCE Price Deflator
YOY % Change
PCE Core Deflator
YOY % Change
Fed Target
YOY (%) Change
Inflation firmed slightly in February on a headline basis, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising 0.3% for the month, following a 0.2% increase in January. On an annual basis, headline CPI rose 2.4%, unchanged from January. Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, increased 0.2% in February, down from January’s 0.3% pace, while the annual rate held steady at 2.5%. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index rose 0.3% in January, easing from a 0.4% gain in December. On a year-over-year basis, headline PCE also edged down to 2.8% from 2.9% the prior month. Core PCE held steady at 0.4% on the month but ticked up to 3.1% annually from

3.0% in December, driven largely by higher healthcare services costs.

Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Commerce

INFLATION
6

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%
Retail Sales YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change
The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index edged up to 91.8 in March from 91.0 in February, a second consecutive gain that nonetheless sits well below the all-time peak of 144.7 from early 2000. The Present Situation component rose 4.6 points to 123.3 on favorable assessments of business and labor conditions, while the Expectations Index slipped 1.7 points to 70.9. Inflation expectations climbed to their highest since August 2025, reflecting tariff passthrough and elevated gasoline prices. February retail sales rebounded

0.6% from January, with stronger auto and broad-based discretionary spending offsetting January’s weather- and vehicle-related weakness; the control group also advanced 0.5%, signaling firmer underlying consumer demand. 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
Index Level
Consumer Confidence
Recession
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: The Conference Board All time high is 144.70 (1/31/00); All time low is 25.30 (2/28/09)

CONSUMER
7

-25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%
Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)
Recession
YOY (%) Change
-1.00
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25

0.00 0.25

0.50 0.75

1.00 Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI)
Recession
3 Month Average
The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) fell to ‑0.11 in February, following a positive revision to 0.20 in January. The index’s three‑month moving average edged up to ‑0.01 from ‑0.02 the prior month. Production and employment related indicators turned negative in February, while sales, orders, and inventories also remained in negative territory. The personal consumption and housing categories slipped modestly but stayed in positive territory. The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index (LEI) declined 0.1% in January, an improvement from ‑0.2% in December, with consumer expectations and building permits the largest drags on the index. On a year‑over‑year basis, the LEI fell 3.8%, continuing to signal slower economic growth heading into 2026. Notably, the latest LEI data do not yet reflect the impact of the war in Iran.

Source: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

LEADING INDICATORS OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
8

0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400
In Thousands of Units
Annualized Housing Starts
Multi Family Housing Starts
Single Family Housing Starts
Housing starts rose 7.2% in January to an annualized pace of 1.487 million units, including 935,000 single-family and 552,000 multifamily starts. The January S&P Cotality Case-Shiller 20-City Composite posted a 1.18% year-over-year gain, continuing deceleration from December’s revised 1.43% annual increase. Inflation again outpaced home price appreciation, extending the erosion of real housing returns that began in the second half of 2025. The Freddie Mac 30-year fixed mortgage rate climbed to 6.46% as of April 2, its fifth consecutive weekly rise, reversing progress made when rates dipped below 6% in February. Higher borrowing costs and elevated prices continue to constrain affordability.

Source: US Department of Commerce Source: S&P
-20.0%
-16.0%
-12.0%
-8.0%
-4.0%

0.0%

4.0%

8.0%

12.0%

16.0%

20.0%

24.0%
S&P/Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Home Price Index
Recession
YOY (%) Change

HOUSING
9

40 45
50 55
60 65
70 Institute of Supply Management (ISM) Surveys
ISM Manufacturing ISM Services

EXPANDING

CONTRACTING
The Institute for Supply Management’s Manufacturing Index rose to 52.7 in March from 52.4, the fastest factory expansion since August 2022 and a third consecutive month above 50. Production accelerated to 55.1 from 53.5, though new orders decelerated to 53.5 from 55.8.

The prices subindex leaped to 78.3 from 70.5, reflecting elevated energy costs, metals tariffs, and Iran-related supply disruptions.

Employment remained in contraction at 48.7. The Services Index eased to 54.0 in March from 56.1 in February but still posted its 21st consecutive month of expansion. With both measures above the 50 threshold, ISM data point toward a resilient if cost-pressured economy.

Source: Institute for Supply Management

SURVEY BASED MEASURES
10

Components of GDP 3/25 6/25 9/25 12/25

0.4% 1.7% 2.3% 1.3%

3.8% -2.7% 0.0% 0.6%
-4.7% 4.8% 1.6% -0.2%
-0.4% -0.4% 0.2% -1.2%

0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1%
-0.6% 3.8% 4.4% 0.7%
State and Local (Consumption and Gross
Investment)
Personal Consumption Expenditures
Gross Private Domestic Investment
Net Exports and Imports
Federal Government Expenditures
Total
-2.0%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
GDP QOQ % Change
GDP YOY % Change
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce The second estimate of real gross domestic product (GDP) showed fourth-quarter growth revised down to 0.7% from the initial 1.4% estimate. The slowdown from 4.4% in the third quarter primarily reflected a sharp pullback in government spending, as the federal government shutdown weighed on activity. Personal Consumption Expenditures also declined across both goods and services.

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP)
11

Source: Federal Reserve Source: Bloomberg
0 1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Assets
Recession
In $ millions
The Federal Reserve left its benchmark interest rate unchanged in March, keeping the target range at 3.50% to 3.75% following three late‑2025 rate cuts that were justified by signs of softening in the labor market. However, policymakers have grown wary of potential inflationary pressures stemming from tariffs, the war in Iran, and the ensuing spike in commodity prices. The Federal Reserve now projects just one rate cut in 2026, even as inflation expectations rise. The Committee also reaffirmed its December decision to halt balance sheet runoff and to reinvest principal and interest payments from its securities holdings, signaling a continued emphasis on maintaining ample reserves and supporting orderly market functioning.

FEDERAL RESERVE

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%
Effective Federal Funds Rate
Recession
Yield (%)
12

Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%
US Treasury Note Yields
2-Year
5-Year
10-Year
Yield (%)

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%
US Treasury Yield Curve
Mar-26
Dec-25
Mar-25
Yield (%)
At March month-end, the 2-year Treasury yield stood at 3.79%, down approximately 9 basis points from one year ago, while the 10-year finished at 4.32%, roughly 11 basis points higher year-over-year. The spread between the two narrowed to 52 basis points, wider by 20 basis points year-over-year. The prior 2-year to 10-year inversion from July 2022 through August 2024 was historically long. The average spread since 2005 is approximately 95 basis points, suggesting the current slope sits well below its long-run norm. The 3-month to 10- year spread stood near 64 basis points at March month-end.

BOND YIELDS
13

ACCOUNT PROFILE
14

OBJECTIVES
Investment Objectives
The investment objectives of the City of Pleasanton are first, to provide safety of principal to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio;second, to provide sufficient liquidity to meet all disbursement requirements; and third, to earn an acceptable rate of return after first considering safety of principal and liquidity.

Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective
The performance objective for the portfolio is to earn a total rate of return through a market cycle that is equal to or above the return on the benchmark index.

Strategy
In order to achieve this objective, the portfolio invests in high-quality fixed income securities that comply with the investment policy and all regulations governing the funds. 15

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of March 31, 2026 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

AGENCY MORTGAGE SECURITIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 0.9 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 0.9 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 2.8 Compliant

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (ABS)
Max % (MV) 20.0 4.6 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.6 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 180 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
CAMP
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant

COLLATERALIZED BANK DEPOSITS
Max % (MV) 100.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
COLLATERALIZED TIME DEPOSITS (NONNEGOTIABLE CD/TD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant

COMMERCIAL PAPER
Max % (MV) 25.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 270 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

CORPORATE MEDIUM TERM NOTES
16

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of March 31, 2026 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes
Max % (MV) 30.0 20.8 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.5 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

FDIC INSURED TIME DEPOSITS (NON-NEGOTIABLE
CD/TD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant

FEDERAL AGENCIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 22.7 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 21.1 Compliant
Max Callables (MV) 20.0 21.1 Not Compliant Inherited securities, complied at time of purchase before policy change Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)
Max Concentration (MV) 75.0 0.0 Compliant

MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.1 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 20.0 0.1 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (NON-AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, LOCAL AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, OTHER STATES)
17

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of March 31, 2026 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (NCD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1 if > FDIC Limit) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Max % (MV) 15.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 1.0 0.0 Compliant

SUPRANATIONAL OBLIGATIONS
Max % (MV) 30.0 1.5 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 1.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 2 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
U.S. TREASURIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 49.4 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 5 Compliant
18

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of March 31, 2026 Benchmark* 3/31/2026
Portfolio
12/31/2025
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 2.65 2.57 1.53
Average Modified Duration 2.47 2.24 1.39
Average Purchase Yield 3.31% 2.52%
Average Market Yield 3.84% 3.98% 3.62%
Average Quality** AA+ AA+ AA+
Total Market Value 194,467,428 193,629,619
*Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index **The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 19

SECTOR DISTRIBUTION
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of March 31, 2026 Sector/MV/Percent
03/31/2026 12/31/2025
Sector % Market Value % Market Value
ABS 4.6% 8,912,096.76 1.3% 2,512,202.67
Agency 22.7% 43,762,376.79 42.6% 82,000,036.88
Agency CMBS 0.9% 1,773,770.54 -- --
Corporate 20.8% 40,145,635.55 17.7% 34,133,759.00
Money Mkt Fd 0.1% 221,006.95 2.3% 4,449,293.76
Supras 1.5% 2,990,281.00 2.1% 3,997,326.00
US Treasury 49.4% 95,388,089.42 33.9% 65,283,929.64
20

ISSUERS
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of March 31, 2026 Issuer Investment Type % Portfolio
United States US Treasury 49.37%
Federal Home Loan Banks Agency 21.11%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. Corporate 2.32%
Farm Credit System Agency 1.54%
Deere & Company Corporate 1.30%
Met Tower Global Funding Corporate 1.15%
Cisco Systems, Inc. Corporate 1.05%
Florida Power & Light Corporate 1.05%
International Bank for Recon and Dev Supras 1.03%
Simon Property Group, Inc. Corporate 1.02%
Amazon.com, Inc. Corporate 0.99%
Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust ABS 0.92%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Agency CMBS 0.92%
American Express Company Corporate 0.91%
Toyota Motor Corporation Corporate 0.79%
Abbvie Inc. Corporate 0.79%
Caterpillar Inc. Corporate 0.78%
U.S. Bancorp Corporate 0.78%
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Corporate 0.78%
Morgan Stanley Corporate 0.78%
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust ABS 0.77%
Bank of America Corporation Corporate 0.77%
BNY Mellon Corp Corporate 0.65%
Prologis, Inc. Corporate 0.64%
Duke Energy Corporation Corporate 0.64%
GM Financial Auto Leasing Trust ABS 0.54%
Realty Income Corporation Corporate 0.52%
International Finance Corporation Supras 0.52%
State Street Corporation Corporate 0.52%
Public Service Enterprise Group Corporate 0.50%
21

ISSUERS
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of March 31, 2026 Issuer Investment Type % Portfolio
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust ABS 0.48%
Toyota Lease Owner Trust ABS 0.41%
Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust ABS 0.40%
T-Mobile Us Trust 2026-1 ABS 0.36%
Deere & Company ABS 0.33%
Hyundai Auto Lease Sec Trust ABS 0.30%
PACCAR Inc Corporate 0.26%
Chubb Limited Corporate 0.26%
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Corporate 0.26%
Royal Bank of Canada Corporate 0.26%
Eli Lilly and Company Corporate 0.26%
Meta Platforms, Inc. Corporate 0.26%
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Corporate 0.26%
Salesforce, Inc. Corporate 0.22%
Money Market Fund Money Mkt Fd 0.11%
BMW Vehicle Lease Trust ABS 0.09%
TOTAL 100.00%
22

QUALITY DISTRIBUTION
Rating 03/31/2026 12/31/2025
AAA 4.29% 2.98%
AA 77.53% 81.23%
A 15.83% 12.16%
A-1+ 0.39% 0.92%
NA 1.96% 2.72%
Rating 03/31/2026 12/31/2025
Aaa 4.71% 5.11%
Aa 77.06% 75.79%
A 15.39% 11.85%
P-1 0.39% 0.92%
NA 2.46% 6.34%
Rating 03/31/2026 12/31/2025
AAA 4.20% 1.30%
AA 80.26% 80.74%
A 6.67% 6.10%
F1+ 0.39% 0.92%
NA 8.49% 10.95%
City of Pleasanton Managed Account | Account #11313 | As of March 31, 2026 S&P Rating Moody’s Rating Fitch Rating
23