Cities Index.
Attachment No. 2 - 2023 E&TS Report

City Council / Housing Authority
September 11, 2023

Document
Attachment No. 2 - 2023 E&TS Report
Meeting
September 11, 2023
Body
City Council / Housing Authority
Original file
15.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pomona.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

City of Pomona
2023 Engineering and
Traffic Survey Report
August 2023
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

August 17, 2023
Mr. Ron Chan, PE, TE
Principal Traffic Engineer
City of Pomona
505 South Garey Avenue
Pomona, CA 91766

Subject: DRAFT 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey

Dear Mr. Chan:

As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey to justify and update the posted speed limits along 134 street segments in the City of Pomona. These segments were last surveyed in 2013 and require an update to comply with the 10-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices.

The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Revision 7 (California MUTCD) dated March 2023, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.

We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Pomona and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study.

Very truly yours,

WILLDAN

Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E.

Traffic Engineer
Enclosure

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

Table of Contents

Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 1 Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey ................................ ................................ ................... 2 Speed Sampling ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 2 Crash History ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 4 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists ................................ ................................ .................. 4 Safety Corridors – New from AB 43 ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 4 Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit – New from AB 43 ..................... 4 Survey Conditions ................................ ................................ ........................... 6 Survey Locations ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 6 Data Collection ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 6 Speed Data ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 6 Field Review Data ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 6 Crash Data ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 7 Safety Corridor Data – New from AB 43 ................................ ................................ ............................ 7 Analysis ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 9 Criteria................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 9 Results and Engineering and Traffic Survey Recommendations ................................ ............................ 9 Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit Application ............................... 10 Speed Limit Recommendations ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 10 Table 1- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Prior to June 30, 2024 ........................... 12 Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes Prior to June 30, 2024 ..................... 20 Segments with Special Conditions ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 21 Legislative References ................................ ................................ ................... 25 Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code ................................ ................................ ................... 25 Engineering and Traffic Surveys ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 25 Basic Speed Law ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 26 Speed Law Violations ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 26 Prima Facie Speed Limits ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 26 Minimum and Maximum Prima Facie Speed Limits ................................ ................................ ......... 28 Downward Speed Zoning ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 29 Safety Corridors (Added code from AB 43) ................................ ................................ ...................... 29 Maintaining Posted Speeds (Added code from AB 43) ................................ ................................ ..... 30 Boundary Line Streets ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 30 Speed Trap Prohibition................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 31 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

Speed Trap ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 31 Speed Trap Evidence ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 33 E&T Amendment : Recommendations After June 30, 2024 .............................. 34 Results and Engineering and Traffic Survey Recommendations ................................ .......................... 34 Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit Application ............................... 34 Speed Limit Recommendations ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 35 Table 3- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary After June 30, 2024 ............................... 36 Table 4- Segments with Recommended Speed Changes After June 30, 2024 ................................ .... 44

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms

APPENDIX C
Survey Equipment

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

1 Introduction
This Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Pomona. This E&T Survey presents recommended speed limits for 134 street segments in the City of Pomona. E&T Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. Historically, these surveys must be updated every 7 to 10 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions.

E&T Surveys are prepared under the direction of California Vehicle Code (CVC). The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by the California MUTCD Revision 7 (California MUTCD) dated March 2023.

Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43), signed in October 2021, has given local agencies more leeway to lower and maintain speed limits. The California Vehicle Code was amended in 2022 and the California MUTCD was amended in March 2023 to implement laws and guidelines with the changes set forth in AB 43. There were three major changes to how speed limits can be recommended under AB 43 as follows:

1. An E&T Survey conducted more than 7 years ago may be extended to 14 years (previously to 10 years) if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)].

2. A local authority may establish and designate safety corridors throughout their jurisdiction. The local authority may recommend a speed limit with an additional five mile per hour reduction on segments designated as safety corridors. Local authorities may not lower a speed limit under this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide, whichever is sooner.

3. If a local authority, after completing an E&T Survey, finds that the speed limit is still reasonable or safe, the local authority may retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

This E&T survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement.

CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City’s Police Department(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)].

Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

2 that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually conducted to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.

The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California MUTCD and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey:

1. Measurement of prevailing speed;

2. Accident history; and

3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey
The California MUTCD specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&T Survey are discussed in more detail as follows:

Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

3 historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. A speed limit is established in the three options below.

Options:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed – A speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed.
▪ California MUTCD Option 2 - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).
▪ Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by an additional 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&T Survey shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round up to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed.
▪ California MUTCD Option 2 - Instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied. ▪ Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round up, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed.

As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey. However, it is best to apply MUTCD Option 2 in these scenarios as it will not require documentation of conditions and justification to lower the speed limit.

If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round down to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed.
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

4 ▪ California MUTCD Option 2 – This option is not applicable to 85th percentile speeds that already round down to the nearest 5-mph increment using the “Closest to 85th Percentile Speed” option. ▪ Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round down, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey.

Crash History
Reported crashes are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than expected average rate of crashes. A segment that has an above-average crash rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph below the basic speed limit.

Safety Corridors – New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7, a new section added through AB 43, to additionally lower the speed limit by designating a safety corridor, shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.

Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent E&T Survey performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.

The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding up, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, plus an additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation, shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85-percentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).

Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit – New from AB 43 The City may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8, added through AB 43.
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

5 The currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&T Survey, the City finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

If the City decides to use a lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&T Survey and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit or not below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

6 Survey Conditions
Survey Locations
The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Pomona. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following:

1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.

2. Minimum visibility restrictions.

3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.

4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.

Data Collection
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic crashes, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 134 locations during the months of March and April 2023.

Speed Data
Radar speed measurements were conducted at 134 locations during the month of April 2023. The radar speed distribution forms are in Appendix B. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments.

Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors:

1. Street width and alignment;

2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;

3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;

4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;

5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;

6. Visibility obstructions;
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

7 7. Land use and proximity to schools;

8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;

9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and

10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.

Crash Data
Crash data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database. For this study, crash data was used from the latest 5 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. The crash rates for the 134 segments are expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles (C/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the crash rate:

𝑹 = 𝑪 × 𝟏, 𝟎𝟎𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝒕 × 𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔
𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓 × 𝒍 × 𝒗

C = Number of midblock crashes over time period
R = Crash Rate (crashes/million vehicle miles)
t = Time Period Covered (in years)
l = Length of Segment (miles)
v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment crash rate was then compared to the average statewide crash rate of similar roadways.

The average statewide crash rates were obtained from 2020 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans.

Safety Corridor Data – New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7, a new section added through AB 43, to additionally lower the speed limit by designating safety corridor, shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.

Safety corridors were established under the guidelines set forth in the California MUTCD. Fatal and severe injury crash data was gathered using UC Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022.

Weighted factors were established across the roadway network to identify which segments are classified as a safety corridor. The weighted factors for the 134 segments are expressed in factors per mile. This information was entered into the following formula to determine the weighted factor for each segment:
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

8 𝑭 = 𝟐𝑻 + 𝟏𝟎𝑺 + 𝟏𝟎𝑺𝑯 + 𝟓𝑷 − 𝟐𝑫 + 𝟏𝑬 + 𝟏𝑽
𝒍
F = Weighted Factor per mile
T = Total Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
S = Speed Related Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
SH = Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes Near Schools and
During School Hours (7am- 4pm)
P = Pedestrian or Bicycle Related Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
D = DUI Related Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
E = Segment within a census tract with a
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile greater than 75%
V = Segment within a census tract with a population ages 65 and older over 16% and/ or a population ages 15 and
younger under 23% according to the American
Community Survey
l = Length of Segment (miles)
The safety corridor established within the 296-mile roadway network within the City of Pomona cannot exceed 1/5 of the total roadway network (59.2 miles) of the City. There were 157 fatal and severe injury crashes observed in the City of Pomona within the 5-year study period. The safety corridor network must include at least 25% of fatal and severe injury crashes. This translates to at least 40 fatal and severe injury crashes in the City’s safety corridor network.

For the City of Pomona, any segment with a weighted factor over 2.0 is considered a safety corridor.

This threshold was selected to prioritize segments with fatal and severe injury crashes that includes the most segments designated as a safety corridor as allowed within the constraints of not exceeding 1/5 of the total roadway network.

𝑺𝒂𝒇𝒆𝒕𝒚 𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒊𝒅𝒐𝒓: 𝑭 > 𝟐. 𝟎
Safety corridors cannot be applied to further lower the speed limit recommendation by an additional 5 mph until June 30, 2024. The amendment to the 2023 E&T Survey in the end of this report addresses safety corridors and includes E&T Survey speed limit recommendations effective after June 30, 2024 based on safety corridor designations identified in this section.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

9 Analysis
Criteria
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California MUTCD. Some of the criteria used are:

A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed.

B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed.

C. The crash rate for each street segment is compared to average crash rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average crash rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Pomona.

Results and Engineering and Traffic Survey Recommendations The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed based on the guidelines for an Engineering and Traffic Survey set forth by the California MUTCD and the CVC. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 1. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements.

Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a crash rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report.

The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

10 Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit Application Using CVC Section 22358.8, a new section added due to AB 43, the City can choose to use previous speed limits from the currently adopted or immediately prior Engineer’s E&T recommendations. This decision is made by the City after an Engineering and Traffic Survey has been completed and is applicable if each of the following three conditions are met:

1. The agency identifies that the posted speed limit is reasonable or safe

2. An Engineer has verified that no general purpose lanes have been added

3. The speed limit was established with an Engineering and Traffic Survey For segments with limits that have been redefined and currently have two different posted speed limits along the segment, the lower of the two speed limits may be retained since the segment has consistent roadway and land use conditions and is adequately combined as a single segment, verified by an Engineer.

The recommendations set forth using this section are considered separate from the Engineering and Traffic Survey Recommendations. After the E&T Survey recommendations have been made, City staff and an Engineer may decide that the posted speed limit is appropriate and can retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limits set by previous E&T Surveys.

When this 2023 adopted E&T Survey expires after either 7 or 14 years, a new E&T Survey will be prepared to recertify the speed limits. It should be noted that the Engineer’s E&T recommendation shall be used as the currently adopted speed limit, as opposed to the City’s speed limit recommendation. On roadway segments when the City’s speed limit recommendation is different than the Engineer’s E&T speed limit recommendation, future recommendations may be made to retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limits using CVC Section 22358.8. In cases where the City recommendation is different than the Engineer’s E&T recommendation, the City’s speed limit recommendation should not be used to retain the currently adopted speed limit in a future E&T Survey prepared either 7 or 14 years after this 2023 E&T Survey has been adopted. For future use, the City and Engineer preparing the next E&T Survey should refer to the Engineer’s E&T recommendation identified in Table 1 and Appendix A.

Speed Limit Recommendations
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.

Table 1 summarizes both the Engineer’s recommendation, through the E&T Survey guidelines, and the City’s recommendation, using CVC Section 22358.8. The City’s recommendations that differ from the E&T Survey’s Engineer’s recommendations are identified as a “Yes” under the “AB 43 (CVC 22358.8) Applied” column. The City’s recommended speed limits are shown in the “2023 Rec Speed” column. 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

11 Table 2 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limit for 2023.

These recommended speed limits shall be enforceable up until June 30, 2024. After June 30, 2024, the E&T Survey amendment including recommendations based on the City’s established safety corridors, on page 34 of this report shall be enforced.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* = See Segments with Special Conditions Section in the Report 12 CITY OF POMONA

Table 1- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Prior to June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
Posted
Speed
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
Engineer's Justification
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2023
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason Speed
Change
1 Alvarado Street San Antonio Ave to Garey Ave 30 30 30 31 30 Closest to 85th Speed NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2 Arrow Highway ECL to Garey Ave 45 45 45 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
3 Arrow Highway Garey Ave to WCL 45 45 45 47 45 Closest to 85th Speed NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
4 Avenida Rancheros Santa Clara Dr to Rancho Navato Dr 45 45 45 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
5 Bonita Avenue ECL to Garey Ave 40 40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
6 Bonita Avenue Garey Ave to WCL 40 40 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
7 County Road ECL to Garey Ave 35 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
8 Dudley Street Gillette Rd to Holt Ave 35 35 35 41 35 * NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
9 Dudley Street Mission Blvd to Phillips Blvd 35 30 30 29 30 Closest to 85th Speed NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
10 East End Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
11 East End Avenue Mission Blvd to SCL 40 40 40 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
12 Fairplex Drive NCL to McKinley Ave 45 45 45 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
13 Fairplex Drive McKinley Ave to W McKinley Ave 45 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
14 Fairplex Drive W McKinley Ave to Murchison Ave 45 45 45 50 45 * NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
15 Fairplex Drive Murchison Ave to Holt Ave 45 40 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
16 Ficus Street Walnut Ave to Riverside Dr 40 30 30 33 30 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 30 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
17 First Street ECL to Towne Ave 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* = See Segments with Special Conditions Section in the Report 13 CITY OF POMONA

Table 1- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Prior to June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
Posted
Speed
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
Engineer's Justification
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2023
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason Speed
Change
18 First Street Towne Ave to Park Ave 35/40/
25 40/25 40/25 33 30 California MUTCD Option
2 YES 25 2013 E&T Recommendation Used -15/NC
19 First Street Park Ave to Oak Ave 40 40 40 45 40 * NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
20 Franklin Avenue ECL to Reservoir St 35 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
21 Franklin Avenue Reservoir St to Garey Ave 40/35 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
22 Franklin Avenue Garey Ave to White Ave 35 35/30 35/30 36 30 * NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS -5/NC
23 Fulton Road Bonita Ave to Arrow Hwy 40 35 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
24 Garey Avenue NCL to Bonita Ave 40 40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
25 Garey Avenue Bonita Ave to La Verne Ave 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
26 Garey Avenue La Verne Ave to Willow St 40 40 40 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
27 Garey Avenue Willow St to Orange Grove Ave 40 40 40 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
28 Garey Avenue Orange Grove Ave to Holt Ave 40/35 40/35 40/35 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used -5/NC 29 Garey Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 30 30 30 32 30 Closest to 85th Speed NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
30 Garey Avenue Mission Blvd to Franklin Ave 35 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
31 Garey Avenue Franklin Ave to County Rd 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
32 Garey Avenue County Rd to SCL 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
33 Grand Avenue ECL to Reservoir St 35 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
34 Grand Avenue Reservoir St to Garey Ave 35 35 35 38 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
35 Grand Avenue Garey Ave to Hansen Ave 35 35 35 35 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* = See Segments with Special Conditions Section in the Report 14 CITY OF POMONA

Table 1- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Prior to June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
Posted
Speed
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
Engineer's Justification
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2023
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason Speed
Change
36 Grove Street Towne Ave to Garey Ave 25 25 25 28 25 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 25 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
37 Grove Street Garey Ave to WCL 25 25 25 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 YES 25 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
38 Hamilton Boulevard Orange Grove Ave to Mission Blvd 35 35 35 41 35 * NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
39 Hamilton Boulevard Mission Blvd to Phillips Blvd 35 35 35 40 35 * NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
40 Hamilton Boulevard Phillips Blvd to Lexington Ave 25 30 30 36 30 * YES 25 2007 Recommendation Used -5 41 Harrison Avenue Towne Ave to Garey Ave 30/35 30 30 35 30 * NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
42 Holt Avenue Mills Ave to San Antonio Ave 35 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
43 Holt Avenue San Antonio Ave to Hamilton Blvd 35 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
44 Holt Avenue Hamilton Blvd to Fairplex Dr 35 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
45 Humane Way Valley Blvd to Mission Blvd 40 40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
46 Indian Hill Boulevard American Ave to Holt Ave 40 40 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
47 Kingsley Avenue ECL to San Antonio Ave 35 35/25 35/25 26 25 Closest to 85th Speed NO 25 Recommendation same as previous E&TS -10/NC
48 La Verne Avenue Mountain Ave to Towne Ave 40 40 40 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
49 La Verne Avenue Towne Ave to Arrow Hwy 40/35 40/35 40/35 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used -5/NC 50 Lexington Avenue ECL to Reservoir St 35 25 25 28 25 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 25 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
51 Lexington Avenue Reservoir St to Towne Ave 35 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
52 Lexington Avenue Towne Ave to Garey Ave 35 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
53 Lexington Avenue Garey Ave to Hamilton Blvd 30/25 30 30 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed YES 30 2013 E&T Recommendation Used 54 Lincoln Avenue ECL to San Antonio Ave 30/25 30 30 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 30 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* = See Segments with Special Conditions Section in the Report 15 CITY OF POMONA

Table 1- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Prior to June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
Posted
Speed
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
Engineer's Justification
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2023
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason Speed
Change
55 McKinley Avenue Towne Ave to Orange Grove Ave 35 35 35 33 30 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
56 McKinley Avenue Orange Grove Ave to White Ave 35 35 35 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
57 McKinley Avenue White Ave to Fairplex Dr 35 35 35 41 35 * NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
58 Mission Boulevard ECL to San Antonio Ave 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
59 Mission Boulevard San Antonio Ave to Park Ave 35 35 35 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used 60 Mission Boulevard Park Ave to Dudley St 35/40 35/40 35/40 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used NC/-5 61 Mission Boulevard Dudley St to Humane Wy 45 45 45 49 45 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 45 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
62 Mission Boulevard Humane Wy to Temple Ave 50 50 50 52 50 Closest to 85th Speed NO 50 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
63 Monterey Avenue Reservoir St to San Antonio Ave 35 25 25 35 30 * YES 25 2013 E&T Recommendation Used 64 Monterey Avenue San Antonio Ave to Palomares St 35 35 35 35 30 * NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
65 Monterey Avenue Palomares St to Hamilton Ave 35/30 35/30 35/30 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 30 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS -5/NC
66 Murchison Avenue Fairplex Dr to Ridgeway St 45 45 45 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
67 Ninth Street ECL to Reservoir St 35 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
68 Ninth Street Reservoir St to White Ave 35 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
69 Ninth Street White Ave to Hansen Ave 35 35 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
70 North Ranch Road Route 71 to Village Loop Rd 35 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
71 Old Pomona Road Route 71 to Village Loop Rd 40 40 40 41 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
72 Olive Street Reservoir St to Garey Ave 35/30 30 30 36 30 * NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
73 Orange Grove Avenue Arrow Hwy to La Verne Ave 35 35 35 40 35 * NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* = See Segments with Special Conditions Section in the Report 16 CITY OF POMONA

Table 1- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Prior to June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
Posted
Speed
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
Engineer's Justification
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2023
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason Speed
Change
74 Orange Grove Avenue La Verne Ave to McKinley Ave 35 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
75 Orange Grove Avenue McKinley Ave to White Ave 35 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
76 Orange Grove Avenue White Ave to Lewis St 35 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
77 Orange Grove Avenue Lewis St to Fairplex Dr 35 35 35 41 35 * NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
78 Palomares Street McKinley Ave to Holt Ave 25 25 25 33 30 California MUTCD Option 2 YES 25 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
79 Palomares Street Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 25 25 25 27 25 Closest to 85th Speed NO 25 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
80 Palomares Street Mission Blvd to Franklin Ave 35 35 35 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
81 Park Avenue Garey Ave to Orange Grove Ave 35 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
82 Park Avenue Orange Grove Ave to Holt Ave 35 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
83 Park Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 35 35 35 33 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
84 Park Avenue Mission Blvd to Rio Rancho Rd 35 35 35 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used 85 Philadelphia Street ECL to Garey Ave 35 35 35 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
86 Phillips Boulevard ECL to Reservoir St 35 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
87 Phillips Boulevard Reservoir St to Garey Ave 35 35/40 35/40 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS NC/-5
88 Phillips Boulevard Garey Ave to Hamilton Blvd 35 40 40 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS -5
89 Phillips Boulevard Hamilton Blvd to Hansen Ave 35 40 40 47 40 * NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
90 Phillips Ranch Road Village Loop Rd to Scenic Ridge Dr 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
91 Pomona Boulevard Route 71 to Temple Ave 45 45 45 43 45 Closest to 85th Speed NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* = See Segments with Special Conditions Section in the Report 17 CITY OF POMONA

Table 1- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Prior to June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
Posted
Speed
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
Engineer's Justification
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2023
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason Speed
Change
92 Pomona Boulevard Temple Ave to Valley Blvd 45 45 45 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
93 Reservoir Street Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 35 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
94 Reservoir Street Mission Blvd to Franklin Ave 35/40 40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
95 Reservoir Street Franklin Ave to SCL 40 40 40 48 45 California MUTCD Option 2 YES 40 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
96 Ridgeway Street Murchison Ave to Valley Blvd 40 40 40 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
97 Rio Rancho Road Garey Ave to Route 71 SB 35 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
98 Rio Rancho Road Route 71 SB to Phillips Ranch Rd 40 40 40 46 40 * NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
99 Riverside Drive ECL to WCL 45 45 45 49 45 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 45 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
100 San Antonio Avenue Towne Ave to Lincoln Ave 35 35 35 41 35 * NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
101 San Antonio Avenue Lincoln Ave to Holt Ave 35 35 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
102 San Antonio Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 35 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
103 San Antonio Avenue Mission Blvd to Phillips Blvd 35 35 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
104 San Antonio Avenue Phillips Blvd to Philadelphia St 35 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 35 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
105 San Bernardino Avenue Mills Ave to Towne Ave 35 35 35 38 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
106 Santa Clara Drive Village Loop Rd to Avenida
Rancheros 35 35 35 40 40 California MUTCD Option
2 YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
107 Second Street Park Ave to Oak Ave 35 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
108 Second Street Oak Ave to Route 71 35 35 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* = See Segments with Special Conditions Section in the Report 18 CITY OF POMONA

Table 1- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Prior to June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
Posted
Speed
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
Engineer's Justification
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2023
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason Speed
Change
109 South Campus Drive Ridgeway St to E Campus Dr 45 45 45 41 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
110 South Campus Drive E Campus Dr to Kellogg Dr 45 45 45 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
111 South Campus Drive Kellogg Dr to Temple Ave 45 N/A 45 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
112 Temple Avenue Rancho Navato Dr to Pomona Blvd 45 45 45 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
113 Temple Avenue Pomona Blvd to WCL 45 45 45 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
114 Towne Avenue Foothill Blvd to Bonita Ave 40 40 40 41 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
115 Towne Avenue Bonita Ave to Arrow Hwy 40 40 40 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
116 Towne Avenue Arrow Hwy to San Bernardino Ave 40 40 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
117 Towne Avenue San Bernardino Ave to Holt Ave 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
118 Towne Avenue Holt Ave to Second St 40 40 40 38 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
119 Towne Avenue Second St to Grand Ave 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
120 Towne Avenue Grand Ave to Lexington Ave 40 40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
121 Towne Avenue Lexington Ave to County Rd 40 40 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 40 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
122 Towne Avenue County Rd to SCL 40 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
123 Valley Boulevard Fairplex Dr to Pomona Blvd 40/45 40/45 45 53 50 California MUTCD Option 2 YES 40 2013 E&T Recommendation Used -5
124 Valley Boulevard Pomona Blvd to WCL 45 45 45 49 45 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 45 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
125 Val Vista Street Loma Vista St to Gillette Rd 35 30 30 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 30 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* = See Segments with Special Conditions Section in the Report 19 CITY OF POMONA

Table 1- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Prior to June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
Posted
Speed
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
Engineer's Justification
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2023
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason Speed
Change
126 Village Loop Road Phillips Ranch Rd to Old Pomona Rd 35 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
127 Village Loop Road Old Pomona Rd to North Ranch Rd 25 25 25 27 25 Closest to 85th Speed NO 25 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
128 Village Loop Road North Ranch Rd to Santa Clara Dr 25 25 25 31 25 * NO 25 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
129 Village Loop Road Santa Clara Dr to Phillips Ranch Rd 35 35 35 45 40 * YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used 130 Walnut Avenue ECL to Ficus St 35 30 30 28 25 California MUTCD Option 2 NO 25 Recommendation Lower than
Previous E&TS -5
131 White Avenue NCL to McKinley Ave 45 45 45 52 50 Closest to 85th Speed YES 45 2013 E&T Recommendation Used 132 White Avenue McKinley Ave to Orange Grove Ave 40 40/35 40/35 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used -5/NC 133 White Avenue Orange Grove Ave to Second St 35 35 35 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
134 White Avenue Second St to Lexington Ave 35 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

20 CITY OF POMONA

Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes Prior to June 30, 2024 No Street Segment Existing
Speed
2023
Rec
Speed
Speed
Change
11 East End Avenue Mission Blvd to SCL 40 35 -5
12 Fairplex Drive NCL to McKinley Ave 45 40 -5
18 First Street Towne Ave to Park Ave 40/25 25* -15/NC
22 Franklin Avenue Garey Ave to White Ave 35/30 30 -5/NC 27 Garey Avenue Willow St to Orange Grove Ave 40 35 -5
28 Garey Avenue Orange Grove Ave to Holt Ave 40/35 35* -5/NC 40 Hamilton Boulevard Phillips Blvd to Lexington Ave 30 25* -5 47 Kingsley Avenue ECL to San Antonio Ave 35/25 25 -10/NC 49 La Verne Avenue Towne Ave to Arrow Hwy 40/35 35* -5/NC 55 McKinley Avenue Towne Ave to Orange Grove Ave 35 30 -5 56 McKinley Avenue Orange Grove Ave to White Ave 35 30 -5 60 Mission Boulevard Park Ave to Dudley St 35/40 35* NC/-5 64 Monterey Avenue San Antonio Ave to Palomares St 35 30 -5 65 Monterey Avenue Palomares St to Hamilton Ave 35/30 30 -5/NC 66 Murchison Avenue Fairplex Dr to Ridgeway St 45 40 -5 80 Palomares Street Mission Blvd to Franklin Ave 35 30 -5 87 Phillips Boulevard Reservoir St to Garey Ave 35/40 35 NC/-5 88 Phillips Boulevard Garey Ave to Hamilton Blvd 40 35 -5 96 Ridgeway Street Murchison Ave to Valley Blvd 40 35 -5 109 South Campus Drive Ridgeway St to E Campus Dr 45 40 -5 110 South Campus Drive E Campus Dr to Kellogg Dr 45 40 -5 111 South Campus Drive Kellogg Dr to Temple Ave 45 40 -5 112 Temple Avenue Rancho Navato Dr to Pomona Blvd 45 40 -5 113 Temple Avenue Pomona Blvd to WCL 45 40 -5
123 Valley Boulevard Fairplex Dr to Pomona Blvd 45 40* -5 130 Walnut Avenue ECL to Ficus St 30 25 -5
132 White Avenue McKinley Ave to Orange Grove Ave 40/35 35* -5/NC

NC = No Change
* = AB 43 (CVC 22358.8) Applied

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

21 CITY OF POMONA

Segments with Special Conditions
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more below the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Each segment is discussed below.

Segment 8 – Dudley Street – Gillette Road to Holt Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has two through lanes in each direction undivided with an ADT of 8,589 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential with a school along the 0.97-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to a higher than average statewide crash rate, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason.

Segment 14 – Fairplex Drive – W McKinley Avenue to Murchison Avenue This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has two through lanes in each direction undivided with an ADT of 19,999 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential with a golf course along the 1.23- mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 50 mph and justifies a 50 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to limited sight distance and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 45 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 19 – First Street – Park Avenue to Oak Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has one through lane in each direction undivided with an ADT of 1,045 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential, industrial, commercial, with a railroad parallel to the 0.87-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a higher than average statewide crash rate, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reason.

Segment 22 – Franklin Avenue – Garey Avenue to White Avenue This segment is currently posted at 30/35 mph and has one through lane in each direction undivided with an ADT of 2,329 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential with a school along the 0.49-mile- long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a crash rate near the statewide crash rate and the historic crash rate calculated in the previous E&T Survey along this segment being higher than the statewide crash rate, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason.

Segment 38 – Hamilton Boulevard – Orange Grove Avenue to Mission Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 5,710 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial and residential, with a school and park along the 0.90-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, to account for the high crash rate along the segment, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

22 CITY OF POMONA

Segment 39 – Hamilton Boulevard – Mission Boulevard to Phillips Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 4,831 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential, commercial, with churches and a school zone along the 0.74-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, in order to maintain uniformity with adjacent segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason.

Segment 40 – Hamilton Boulevard – Phillips Boulevard to Lexington Avenue This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,350 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.510-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, because the segment is a high-density residential area, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason. Additionally, this segment was identified by the City to apply CVC Section 22358.8 to restore the immediately prior speed limit from the 2007 E&T Survey to post the speed limit at 25 mph.

Segment 41 – Harrison Avenue – Towne Avenue to Garey Avenue This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,661 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and commercial with a school along the 0.66- mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a higher than average statewide crash rate, a lower speed limit is prudent.

It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason.

Segment 57 – Mckinley Avenue – White Avenue to Fairplex Drive This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one to two through lanes running east and one lane running west with an ADT of 5,637 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential with the fairgrounds along the 0.82-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to limited sight distance and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 63 – Monterey Avenue – Reservoir Street to San Antonio Avenue This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,417 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential with along the 0.24-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due a higher than average statewide crash rate, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reasons. Additionally, this segment was identified by the City to apply CVC Section 22358.8 to retain the existing speed limit from the 2013 E&T Survey to post the speed limit at 25 mph.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

23 CITY OF POMONA

Segment 64 – Monterey Avenue – San Antonio Avenue to Palomares Street This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,417 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and industrial with a church along the 0.50-mile- long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a higher than average statewide crash rate, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 72 – Olive Street – Reservoir Street to Garey Avenue This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,583 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential, business, and commercial along the 0.98-mile- long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, because the segment is a high-density residential area and there are multiple uncontrolled crosswalks, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 73 – Orange Grove Avenue – Arrow Highway to La Verne Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 7,077 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential with a park and school along the 0.56-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to the presence of an uncontrolled crosswalk, school-age pedestrians, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 77 – Orange Grove Avenue – Lewis Street to Fairplex Drive This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 8,977 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential, industrial, and commercial along the 1.10-mile- long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a higher than average statewide crash rate, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason.

Segment 89 – Phillips Boulevard – Hamilton Boulevard to Hansen Avenue This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has one to two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 5,926 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.47-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 47 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a higher than average statewide crash rate, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reason.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

24 CITY OF POMONA

Segment 98 – Rio Rancho Road – Route 71 South Bound to Phillips Ranch Road This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 16,228 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and commercial with Route 71 along the 1.00- mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 46 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to limited sight distance, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reason.

Segment 100 – San Antonio Avenue – Towne Avenue to Lincoln Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 15,278 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential with a school and park along the 1.11-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, multiple uncontrolled school crosswalks, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason.

Segment 128 – Village Loop Road – North Ranch Road to Santa Clara Drive This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 1,178 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.53-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 31 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, because the segment is a high-density residential area, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reasons.

Segment 129 – Village Loop Road – Santa Clara Drive to Phillips Ranch Road This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 15,719 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential with a park along the 0.80-mile-long segment.

The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to limited sight distance and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 40 mph for the above reasons. Additionally, this segment was identified by the City to apply CVC Section 22358.8 to retain the existing speed limit from the 2013 E&T Survey to post the speed limit at 35 mph.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

25 CITY OF POMONA

Legislative References
Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code
The following sections of the CVC are from the most recently published CVC as of August 2023 and contain new sections pertaining to AB 43.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys
Section 627.
(a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

26 CITY OF POMONA

Basic Speed Law
Section 22350.

No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations
Section 22351.
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22352.

The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. (2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

27 CITY OF POMONA

Section 22357.1.

Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children’s playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 mile per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted.

Section 22358.4
(a)
(1) Wherever a local authority determines upon the basis on an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority my, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected up on the highway.
(b)
(1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

28 CITY OF POMONA

other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5)
(A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For the purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at a distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from school grounds.

Minimum and Maximum Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

29 CITY OF POMONA

Section 22358.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Section 22358.3.

Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Section 22360.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the speed limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a highway other than a state highway for a distance of not exceeding 2,000 feet in length between district, either business or residence, the local authority may determine and declare a reasonable and safe prima facie limit thereon lower than 65 mile per hour, but not less than 25 miles per hour, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street or highway.

Downward Speed Zoning
Section 22358.5.

It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Safety Corridors (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.7.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

30 CITY OF POMONA

(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) A portion of the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(3) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government code, whichever is sooner.
(4) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Maintaining Posted Speeds (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.8.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Boundary Line Streets
Section 22359.

With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

31 CITY OF POMONA

Speed Trap Prohibition
Section 40801.

No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

Speed Trap
Section 40802.
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
(b)
(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

32 CITY OF POMONA

(3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour of 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (c)
(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C)
(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

33 CITY OF POMONA

(B)
(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

Speed Trap Evidence
Section 40803.
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

34 CITY OF POMONA

E&T Amendment : Recommendations After
June 30, 2024
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7, a new section added through AB 43, to additionally lower the speed limit by designating a safety corridor, shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner. The following amendment to the E&T Survey speed limit recommendations shall be implemented and enforceable after June 30, 2024 to include speed limit reductions due to safety corridor designations throughout the City.

Results and Engineering and Traffic Survey Recommendations The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed based on the guidelines for an Engineering and Traffic Survey set forth by the California MUTCD and the CVC, including the designation of safety corridors. A complete summary of all recommendations in this amendment is shown in Table 3. The amendment to the speed limit recommendations only include changes to the speed limits due to safety corridor designations that can be in effect after June 30, 2024.

Segments designated as safety corridors can have an additional 5-mph reduction in the recommended speed limit in the E&T Survey speed limit recommendation, even when the speed limit has already been reduced using MUTCD Option 2 or has already been reduced 5-mph with special conditions.

Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit Application Using CVC Section 22358.8, a new section added due to AB 43, the City can choose to use previous speed limits from the currently adopted or immediately prior Engineer’s E&T recommendations. This decision is made by the City after an Engineering and Traffic Survey has been completed and is applicable if each of the following three conditions are met:

1. The agency identifies that the posted speed limit is reasonable or safe

2. An Engineer has verified that no general purpose lanes have been added

3. The speed limit was established with an Engineering and Traffic Survey For segments with limits that have been redefined and currently have two different posted speed limits along the segment, the lower of the two speed limits may be retained since the segment has consistent roadway and land use conditions and is adequately combined as a single segment, verified by an Engineer.

When this 2023 adopted E&T Survey expires after either 7 or 14 years, a new E&T Survey will be prepared to recertify the speed limits. It should be noted that the Engineer’s E&T recommendation shall be used as the currently adopted speed limit, as opposed to the City’s speed limit recommendation, or what would be the posted speed limit. In cases where the City’s recommendation is different than the 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

35 CITY OF POMONA

Engineer’s E&T recommendation, the City’s speed limit recommendation should not be used to retain the currently adopted speed limit in the next E&T Survey. The City should refer to the Engineer’s E&T recommendation identified in Table 3 and Appendix A. Some segments that have been designated as safety corridors have now established the speed limit through E&T recommendations in this amendment instead of through CVC Section 22358.8 as it was determined in the original 2023 E&T Survey Report. In these cases, future E&T Surveys may use the amended E&T speed limit recommendation using safety corridors as the currently adopted speed limit.

Speed Limit Recommendations
The recommendations contained in this amendment are intended to establish prima facie speed limits.

They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions.

A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.

Table 3 summarizes three of the following considerations in the speed limit amendment recommendation, effective after June 30, 2024:
▪ The original 2023 Engineer’s recommendation, through the E&T Survey guidelines ▪ Segments designated as a safety corridor and the E&T speed limit recommendation based on safety corridor designations that can be established after June 30, 2024 ▪ The City’s recommendation, using CVC Section 22358.8. The City’s recommendations that differ from the E&T Survey’s Engineer’s recommendations identified in the “2024 E&T (Eng Rec)” column are identified as a “Yes” under the “AB 43 (CVC 22358.8) Applied” column. The City’s recommended speed limits are shown in the “2024 Rec Speed” column.

Table 4 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limit from the 2023 E&T Survey to the amendment effective after June 30, 2024.

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* See segments with special conditions section earlier in the report 36 CITY OF POMONA

Table 3- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
2023 E&T Engineer's
Justification
Posted
(2023
City's
Rec)
Speed
Safety
Corridor
2024
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2024
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason
Speed
Change
from 2023
City's Rec
1 Alvarado Street San Antonio Ave to Garey Ave 30 30 31 30 Closest to 85th Speed 30 NO 30 NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2 Arrow Highway ECL to Garey Ave 45 45 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed 45 YES 40 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
3 Arrow Highway Garey Ave to WCL 45 45 47 45 Closest to 85th Speed 45 NO 45 NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
4 Avenida
Rancheros
Santa Clara Dr to Rancho Navato
Dr 45 45 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed 45 NO 45 NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
5 Bonita Avenue ECL to Garey Ave 40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
6 Bonita Avenue Garey Ave to WCL 40 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
7 County Road ECL to Garey Ave 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
8 Dudley Street Gillette Rd to Holt Ave 35 35 41 35 * 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
9 Dudley Street Mission Blvd to Phillips Blvd 35 30 29 30 Closest to 85th Speed 30 NO 30 NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
10 East End Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
11 East End Avenue Mission Blvd to SCL 40 40 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
12 Fairplex Drive NCL to McKinley Ave 45 45 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
13 Fairplex Drive McKinley Ave to W McKinley
Ave 45 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
14 Fairplex Drive W McKinley Ave to Murchison
Ave 45 45 50 45 * 45 NO 45 NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
15 Fairplex Drive Murchison Ave to Holt Ave 45 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
16 Ficus Street Walnut Ave to Riverside Dr 40 30 33 30 California MUTCD Option 2 30 NO 30 NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
17 First Street ECL to Towne Ave 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
18 First Street Towne Ave to Park Ave 35/40/
25 40/25 33 30 California MUTCD Option 2 25 NO 30 YES 25 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* See segments with special conditions section earlier in the report 37 CITY OF POMONA

Table 3- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
2023 E&T Engineer's
Justification
Posted
(2023
City's
Rec)
Speed
Safety
Corridor
2024
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2024
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason
Speed
Change
from 2023
City's Rec
19 First Street Park Ave to Oak Ave 40 40 45 40 * 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
20 Franklin Avenue ECL to Reservoir St 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
21 Franklin Avenue Reservoir St to Garey Ave 40/35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
22 Franklin Avenue Garey Ave to White Ave 35 35/30 36 30 * 30 YES 25 NO 25 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
23 Fulton Road Bonita Ave to Arrow Hwy 40 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
24 Garey Avenue NCL to Bonita Ave 40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
25 Garey Avenue Bonita Ave to La Verne Ave 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
26 Garey Avenue La Verne Ave to Willow St 40 40 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
27 Garey Avenue Willow St to Orange Grove Ave 40 40 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
28 Garey Avenue Orange Grove Ave to Holt Ave 40/35 40/35 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as Previous E&TS
29 Garey Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 30 30 32 30 Closest to 85th Speed 30 YES 25 NO 25 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
30 Garey Avenue Mission Blvd to Franklin Ave 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
31 Garey Avenue Franklin Ave to County Rd 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
32 Garey Avenue County Rd to SCL 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
33 Grand Avenue ECL to Reservoir St 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
34 Grand Avenue Reservoir St to Garey Ave 35 35 38 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
35 Grand Avenue Garey Ave to Hansen Ave 35 35 35 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
36 Grove Street Towne Ave to Garey Ave 25 25 28 25 California MUTCD Option 2 25 NO 25 NO 25 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* See segments with special conditions section earlier in the report 38 CITY OF POMONA

Table 3- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
2023 E&T Engineer's
Justification
Posted
(2023
City's
Rec)
Speed
Safety
Corridor
2024
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2024
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason
Speed
Change
from 2023
City's Rec
37 Grove Street Garey Ave to WCL 25 25 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 25 NO 30 YES 25 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
38 Hamilton
Boulevard
Orange Grove Ave to Mission
Blvd 35 35 41 35 * 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
39 Hamilton
Boulevard Mission Blvd to Phillips Blvd 35 35 40 35 * 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
40 Hamilton
Boulevard Phillips Blvd to Lexington Ave 25 30 36 30 * 25 NO 30 YES 25 2007 Recommendation Used 41 Harrison Avenue Towne Ave to Garey Ave 30/35 30 35 30 * 30 NO 30 NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
42 Holt Avenue Mills Ave to San Antonio Ave 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
43 Holt Avenue San Antonio Ave to Hamilton
Blvd 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
44 Holt Avenue Hamilton Blvd to Fairplex Dr 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
45 Humane Way Valley Blvd to Mission Blvd 40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
46 Indian Hill
Boulevard American Ave to Holt Ave 40 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
47 Kingsley Avenue ECL to San Antonio Ave 35 35/25 26 25 Closest to 85th Speed 25 NO 25 NO 25 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
48 La Verne Avenue Mountain Ave to Towne Ave 40 40 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
49 La Verne Avenue Towne Ave to Arrow Hwy 40/35 40/35 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 40 YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
50 Lexington Avenue ECL to Reservoir St 35 25 28 25 California MUTCD Option 2 25 NO 25 NO 25 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
51 Lexington Avenue Reservoir St to Towne Ave 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
52 Lexington Avenue Towne Ave to Garey Ave 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
53 Lexington Avenue Garey Ave to Hamilton Blvd 30/25 30 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed 30 NO 35 YES 30 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
54 Lincoln Avenue ECL to San Antonio Ave 30/25 30 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 30 NO 30 NO 30 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* See segments with special conditions section earlier in the report 39 CITY OF POMONA

Table 3- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
2023 E&T Engineer's
Justification
Posted
(2023
City's
Rec)
Speed
Safety
Corridor
2024
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2024
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason
Speed
Change
from 2023
City's Rec
55 McKinley Avenue Towne Ave to Orange Grove Ave 35 35 33 30 California MUTCD Option 2 30 NO 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
56 McKinley Avenue Orange Grove Ave to White Ave 35 35 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 30 NO 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
57 McKinley Avenue White Ave to Fairplex Dr 35 35 41 35 * 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
58 Mission Boulevard ECL to San Antonio Ave 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
59 Mission Boulevard San Antonio Ave to Park Ave 35 35 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as Previous E&TS
60 Mission Boulevard Park Ave to Dudley St 35/40 35/40 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as Previous E&TS
61 Mission Boulevard Dudley St to Humane Wy 45 45 49 45 California MUTCD Option 2 45 YES 40 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
62 Mission Boulevard Humane Wy to Temple Ave 50 50 52 50 Closest to 85th Speed 50 YES 45 NO 45 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
63 Monterey Avenue Reservoir St to San Antonio Ave 35 25 35 30 * 25 YES 25 NO 25 Recommendation same as Previous E&TS
64 Monterey Avenue San Antonio Ave to Palomares St 35 35 35 30 * 30 YES 25 NO 25 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
65 Monterey Avenue Palomares St to Hamilton Ave 35/30 35/30 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 30 YES 25 NO 25 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
66 Murchison
Avenue Fairplex Dr to Ridgeway St 45 45 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
67 Ninth Street ECL to Reservoir St 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
68 Ninth Street Reservoir St to White Ave 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
69 Ninth Street White Ave to Hansen Ave 35 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
70 North Ranch Road Route 71 to Village Loop Rd 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
71 Old Pomona Road Route 71 to Village Loop Rd 40 40 41 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
72 Olive Street Reservoir St to Garey Ave 35/30 30 36 30 * 30 YES 25 NO 25 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* See segments with special conditions section earlier in the report 40 CITY OF POMONA

Table 3- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
2023 E&T Engineer's
Justification
Posted
(2023
City's
Rec)
Speed
Safety
Corridor
2024
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2024
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason
Speed
Change
from 2023
City's Rec
73 Orange Grove
Avenue Arrow Hwy to La Verne Ave 35 35 40 35 * 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
74 Orange Grove
Avenue La Verne Ave to McKinley Ave 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
75 Orange Grove
Avenue McKinley Ave to White Ave 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
76 Orange Grove
Avenue White Ave to Lewis St 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
77 Orange Grove
Avenue Lewis St to Fairplex Dr 35 35 41 35 * 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
78 Palomares Street McKinley Ave to Holt Ave 25 25 33 30 California MUTCD Option 2 25 NO 30 YES 25 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
79 Palomares Street Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 25 25 27 25 Closest to 85th Speed 25 NO 25 NO 25 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
80 Palomares Street Mission Blvd to Franklin Ave 35 35 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 30 NO 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
81 Park Avenue Garey Ave to Orange Grove Ave 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
82 Park Avenue Orange Grove Ave to Holt Ave 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
83 Park Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 35 35 33 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
84 Park Avenue Mission Blvd to Rio Rancho Rd 35 35 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 40 YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
85 Philadelphia
Street ECL to Garey Ave 35 35 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 40 YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
86 Phillips Boulevard ECL to Reservoir St 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
87 Phillips Boulevard Reservoir St to Garey Ave 35 35/40 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
88 Phillips Boulevard Garey Ave to Hamilton Blvd 35 40 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
89 Phillips Boulevard Hamilton Blvd to Hansen Ave 35 40 47 40 * 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
90 Phillips Ranch
Road
Village Loop Rd to Scenic Ridge
Dr 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* See segments with special conditions section earlier in the report 41 CITY OF POMONA

Table 3- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
2023 E&T Engineer's
Justification
Posted
(2023
City's
Rec)
Speed
Safety
Corridor
2024
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2024
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason
Speed
Change
from 2023
City's Rec
91 Pomona
Boulevard Route 71 to Temple Ave 45 45 43 45 Closest to 85th Speed 45 YES 40 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
92 Pomona
Boulevard Temple Ave to Valley Blvd 45 45 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed 45 NO 45 NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
93 Reservoir Street Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
94 Reservoir Street Mission Blvd to Franklin Ave 35/40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
95 Reservoir Street Franklin Ave to SCL 40 40 48 45 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as Previous E&TS
96 Ridgeway Street Murchison Ave to Valley Blvd 40 40 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
97 Rio Rancho Road Garey Ave to Route 71 SB 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
98 Rio Rancho Road Route 71 SB to Phillips Ranch Rd 40 40 46 40 * 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
99 Riverside Drive ECL to WCL 45 45 49 45 California MUTCD Option 2 45 NO 45 NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
100 San Antonio
Avenue Towne Ave to Lincoln Ave 35 35 41 35 * 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
101 San Antonio
Avenue Lincoln Ave to Holt Ave 35 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
102 San Antonio
Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
103 San Antonio
Avenue Mission Blvd to Phillips Blvd 35 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
104 San Antonio
Avenue Phillips Blvd to Philadelphia St 35 35 39 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
105 San Bernardino
Avenue Mills Ave to Towne Ave 35 35 38 35 California MUTCD Option 2 35 YES 30 NO 30 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
106 Santa Clara Drive Village Loop Rd to Avenida
Rancheros 35 35 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 40 YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
107 Second Street Park Ave to Oak Ave 35 35 35 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
108 Second Street Oak Ave to Route 71 35 35 36 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* See segments with special conditions section earlier in the report 42 CITY OF POMONA

Table 3- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
2023 E&T Engineer's
Justification
Posted
(2023
City's
Rec)
Speed
Safety
Corridor
2024
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2024
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason
Speed
Change
from 2023
City's Rec
109 South Campus
Drive Ridgeway St to E Campus Dr 45 45 41 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
110 South Campus
Drive E Campus Dr to Kellogg Dr 45 45 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
111 South Campus
Drive Kellogg Dr to Temple Ave 45 N/A 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
112 Temple Avenue Rancho Navato Dr to Pomona
Blvd 45 45 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
113 Temple Avenue Pomona Blvd to WCL 45 45 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
114 Towne Avenue Foothill Blvd to Bonita Ave 40 40 41 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
115 Towne Avenue Bonita Ave to Arrow Hwy 40 40 40 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
116 Towne Avenue Arrow Hwy to San Bernardino
Ave 40 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
117 Towne Avenue San Bernardino Ave to Holt Ave 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
118 Towne Avenue Holt Ave to Second St 40 40 38 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
119 Towne Avenue Second St to Grand Ave 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
120 Towne Avenue Grand Ave to Lexington Ave 40 40 44 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
121 Towne Avenue Lexington Ave to County Rd 40 40 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
122 Towne Avenue County Rd to SCL 40 40 42 40 Closest to 85th Speed 40 NO 40 NO 40 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
123 Valley Boulevard Fairplex Dr to Pomona Blvd 40/45 40/45 53 50 California MUTCD Option 2 40 YES 45 YES 40 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
124 Valley Boulevard Pomona Blvd to WCL 45 45 49 45 California MUTCD Option 2 45 NO 45 NO 45 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
125 Val Vista Street Loma Vista St to Gillette Rd 35 30 34 30 California MUTCD Option 2 30 YES 25 NO 25 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS -5
126 Village Loop Road Phillips Ranch Rd to Old Pomona
Rd 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

* See segments with special conditions section earlier in the report 43 CITY OF POMONA

Table 3- Citywide Speed Limit Recommendation Summary After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment 2007
E&T
2013
E&T
2023
85th
Speed
2023
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
2023 E&T Engineer's
Justification
Posted
(2023
City's
Rec)
Speed
Safety
Corridor
2024
E&T
(Eng
Rec)
AB 43
(CVC
22358.8)
Applied
2024
City's
Rec
Speed
Reason
Speed
Change
from 2023
City's Rec
127 Village Loop Road Old Pomona Rd to North Ranch
Rd 25 25 27 25 Closest to 85th Speed 25 NO 25 NO 25 Recommendation same as previous E&TS
128 Village Loop Road North Ranch Rd to Santa Clara
Dr 25 25 31 25 * 25 NO 25 NO 25 Recommendation same as
previous E&TS
129 Village Loop Road Santa Clara Dr to Phillips Ranch
Rd 35 35 45 40 * 35 NO 40 YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
130 Walnut Avenue ECL to Ficus St 35 30 28 25 California MUTCD Option 2 25 NO 25 NO 25 Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS
131 White Avenue NCL to McKinley Ave 45 45 52 50 Closest to 85th Speed 45 NO 50 YES 45 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
132 White Avenue McKinley Ave to Orange Grove
Ave 40 40/35 45 45 Closest to 85th Speed 35 YES 40 YES 35 2013 E&T Recommendation Used
133 White Avenue Orange Grove Ave to Second St 35 35 43 40 California MUTCD Option 2 35 YES 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as Previous E&TS
134 White Avenue Second St to Lexington Ave 35 35 37 35 Closest to 85th Speed 35 NO 35 NO 35 Recommendation same as previous E&TS

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

44 Table 4- Segments with Recommended Speed Changes After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment
Existing
Speed
(2023
Rec)
2024
Rec
Speed
Speed
Change
from
2023
Rec
2 Arrow Highway ECL to Garey Ave 45 40 -5
8 Dudley Street Gillette Rd to Holt Ave 35 30 -5
15 Fairplex Drive Murchison Ave to Holt Ave 40 35 -5
17 First Street ECL to Towne Ave 40 35 -5
22 Franklin Avenue Garey Ave to White Ave 30 25 -5
24 Garey Avenue NCL to Bonita Ave 40 35 -5
25 Garey Avenue Bonita Ave to La Verne Ave 40 35 -5
29 Garey Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 30 25 -5
30 Garey Avenue Mission Blvd to Franklin Ave 35 30 -5
31 Garey Avenue Franklin Ave to County Rd 40 35 -5
38 Hamilton Boulevard Orange Grove Ave to Mission Blvd 35 30 -5 39 Hamilton Boulevard Mission Blvd to Phillips Blvd 35 30 -5 42 Holt Avenue Mills Ave to San Antonio Ave 35 30 -5
43 Holt Avenue San Antonio Ave to Hamilton Blvd 35 30 -5 44 Holt Avenue Hamilton Blvd to Fairplex Dr 35 30 -5
45 Humane Way Valley Blvd to Mission Blvd 40 35 -5
46 Indian Hill Boulevard American Ave to Holt Ave 40 35 -5 48 La Verne Avenue Mountain Ave to Towne Ave 40 35 -5
58 Mission Boulevard ECL to San Antonio Ave 40 35 -5
61 Mission Boulevard Dudley St to Humane Wy 45 40 -5
62 Mission Boulevard Humane Wy to Temple Ave 50 45 -5
64 Monterey Avenue San Antonio Ave to Palomares St 30 25 -5 65 Monterey Avenue Palomares St to Hamilton Ave 30 25 -5 66 Murchison Avenue Fairplex Dr to Ridgeway St 40 35 -5 72 Olive Street Reservoir St to Garey Ave 30 25 -5
76 Orange Grove Avenue White Ave to Lewis St 35 30 -5
77 Orange Grove Avenue Lewis St to Fairplex Dr 35 30 -5 82 Park Avenue Orange Grove Ave to Holt Ave 35 30 -5
91 Pomona Boulevard Route 71 to Temple Ave 45 40 -5
93 Reservoir Street Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 35 30 -5
94 Reservoir Street Mission Blvd to Franklin Ave 40 35 -5 97 Rio Rancho Road Garey Ave to Route 71 SB 35 30 -5
101 San Antonio Avenue Lincoln Ave to Holt Ave 35 30 -5 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

45 Table 4- Segments with Recommended Speed Changes After June 30, 2024 No Street Segment
Existing
Speed
(2023
Rec)
2024
Rec
Speed
Speed
Change
from
2023
Rec
102 San Antonio Avenue Holt Ave to Mission Blvd 35 30 -5 105 San Bernardino Avenue Mills Ave to Towne Ave 35 30 -5 111 South Campus Drive Kellogg Dr to Temple Ave 40 35 -5 114 Towne Avenue Foothill Blvd to Bonita Ave 40 35 -5
116 Towne Avenue Arrow Hwy to San Bernardino Ave 40 35 -5 120 Towne Avenue Grand Ave to Lexington Ave 40 35 -5
121 Towne Avenue Lexington Ave to County Rd 40 35 -5
125 Val Vista Street Loma Vista St to Gillette Rd 30 25 -5 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 1Segment STREET Alvarado Street
FROM San Antonio Avenue TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 3,168 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/26/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:12 PM
50th Percentile Speed 26
85th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.40
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Towne, Stop @ San Antonio, Caswell, Palomares Crosswalks @ Garey, Towne
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.870
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential/Historic District, St Paul's Church/School Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 30 2013: 30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 2Segment STREET Arrow Highway
FROM East City Limit TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 18,322 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/20/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:27 PM
50th Percentile Speed 41
85th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace Speed 36-45
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 24
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.87
Segment Crash Rate 0.59
Number of Lanes 6 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Orange Grove, Towne Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.210
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use Residential,School, Commercial, Major Int/Church, Park Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 2
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 8.44
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Towne
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 40
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
40 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 3Segment STREET Arrow Highway
FROM Garey Avenue TO West City Limits
Average Daily Traffic 12,250 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/20/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:07 PM
50th Percentile Speed 42
85th Percentile Speed 47
10 mph Pace Speed 38-47
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 4
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.87
Segment Crash Rate 0.23
Number of Lanes 4-5 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey
Crosswalks @ Garey
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.780
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 84
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Business, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Fulton
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 4Segment STREET Avenida Rancheros
FROM Santa Clara Drive TO Rancho Navato Drive
Average Daily Traffic 23,284 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/11/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:30 AM
50th Percentile Speed 41
85th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace Speed 37-46
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.93
Segment Crash Rate 0.00
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Partial Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Rancho Navato, Santa Clara, Stop @ La Sierra Crosswalks @ Rancho Navato, Santa Clara
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking None
Segment Length 0.430
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill SB
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 5Segment STREET Bonita Avenue
FROM East City Limits TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 12,745 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/20/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:26 PM
50th Percentile Speed 40
85th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace Speed 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 10
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.47
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Towne
Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.920
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 63
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Business, Fire Station
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 6Segment STREET Bonita Avenue
FROM Garey Avenue TO West City Limit
Average Daily Traffic 10,450 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/20/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:46 PM
50th Percentile Speed 39
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.22
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey
Crosswalks @ Garey
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.480
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 60
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Business, Industrial, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 0.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Garey
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 7Segment STREET County Road
FROM East City Limit TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 3,496 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/7/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:50 PM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 4
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.63
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Reservoir, Garey, Towne Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.990
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 46
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School District, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 8Segment STREET Dudley Street
FROM Gillette Road TO Holt Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 8,589 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/27/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:51 PM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 22
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.00
Segment Crash Rate 1.45
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Holt, Orange Grove, Elwood, Stop @ Arroyo, Gillette, 10 Fwy EB Crosswalks @ Holt, Orange Grove, Arroyo, Elwood
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.970
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 18.53
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Crash Rate
Vertical Curve Yes @ Fwy
Horizontal Curve Yes @ 10 FWY
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 1 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 9Segment STREET Dudley Street
FROM Mission Boulevard TO Phillips Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 3,957 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/25/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:48 PM
50th Percentile Speed 25
85th Percentile Speed 29
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.24
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, Stop @ Phillips, 9th, Vejar, Mc Comas Crosswalks @ Mission
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.560
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 35
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Smith
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 10Segment STREET East End Avenue
FROM Holt Avenue TO Mission Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 13,622 Date Counted 3/9/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/12/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.42
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Partial Raised Median+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, Via Pueblo, Pueblo School Ent, Holt Crosswalks @ Mission, Pueblo School Ent, Holt
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.480
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Business, High School
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Under RxR
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Holt
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 11Segment STREET East End Avenue
FROM Mission Boulevard TO South City Limits
Average Daily Traffic 8,124 Date Counted 3/9/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/12/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:32 AM
50th Percentile Speed 29
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 54
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 9
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.82
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, Stop @ 9th, Grand Crosswalks @ Mission
Pedestrian Traffic Few
On-Street Parking Few
Segment Length 0.740
Sidewalks Few
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 52
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Business, Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Heavy
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 12Segment STREET Fairplex Drive
FROM North City Limits TO McKinley Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 11,538 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:20 PM
50th Percentile Speed 37
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 59
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.77
Segment Crash Rate 0.00
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Puddingstone, Stop@ McKinley Crosswalks @ All T.S., All Stop
Pedestrian Traffic Few
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.760
Sidewalks Yes, W/S Only
Driveways Yes, W/S Only
Lighting No
Width 57
Adjacent Land Use Fairgrounds, Brackett Field Airport, Business Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 13Segment STREET Fairplex Drive
FROM McKinley Avenue TO W McKinley Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 15,699 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:54 AM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.21
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @McKinley-East, Un-Named Fair Ent, Stop @McKinley-West Crosswalks @ Stop McKinley-West
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.330
Sidewalks No
Driveways No
Lighting Yes
Width 63
Adjacent Land Use Fairgrounds, Golf Course
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 14Segment STREET Fairplex Drive
FROM W Mckinley Avenue TO Murchison Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 19,999 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:34 AM
50th Percentile Speed 45
85th Percentile Speed 50
10 mph Pace Speed 41-50
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.77
Segment Crash Rate 0.27
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ McKinley-East, Via Verde, 10 Fwy EB+WB, Murchison Crosswalks @ Via Verde, Murchison
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 1.230
Sidewalks No
Driveways No
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Golf Course, Residential, Coco Palms
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Maintain Speed Uniformity
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions Fair/PoorVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 15Segment STREET Fairplex Drive
FROM Murchison Avenue TO Holt Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 13,702 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:55 AM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.71
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Partial Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Murchison, Elwood, Avalon, Arroyo, Orange Grove, Holt Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.680
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 65
Adjacent Land Use Residential, High School, Park, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 11.29
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Murchison
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 16Segment STREET Ficus Street
FROM Walnut Avenue TO Riverside Drive
Average Daily Traffic 2,345 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/7/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:55 AM
50th Percentile Speed 28
85th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Riverside
Crosswalks None
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.300
Sidewalks No
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 48
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Heavy
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 17Segment STREET First Street
FROM East City Limit TO Towne Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 8,374 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/17/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 54
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 21
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.11
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control None
Crosswalks None
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.240
Sidewalks Yes, S/S Only
Driveways Yes, S/S Only
Lighting Yes
Width 39
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Commercial, RxR
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 14.71
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 18Segment STREET First Street
FROM Towne Avenue TO Park Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 3,393 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/17/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:49 AM
50th Percentile Speed 28
85th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limi 25/40
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.57
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ San Antonio, Palomares, Stop @ Eleanor, Garey, Main, Park Crosswalks @ San Antonio, Palomares, Metro Link, Main
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.720
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 48
Adjacent Land Use Western Univ, Metro, Hospital, Commercial, Parking Lot, RxR, Industrial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35,40,25 2013: 40,25
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 19Segment STREET First Street
FROM Park Avenue TO Oak Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 1,045 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/17/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:35 AM
50th Percentile Speed 37
85th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.21
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Hamilton, Park
Crosswalks None
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.870
Sidewalks Yes, S/S Only
Driveways Yes, S/S Only
Lighting Yes
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Industrial, RxR Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Crash Rate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 20Segment STREET Franklin Avenue
FROM East City Limit TO Reservoir Street
Average Daily Traffic 2,944 Date Counted 5/24/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:10 AM
50th Percentile Speed 29
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 60
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 3.95
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Reservoir
Crosswalks @ Reservoir
Pedestrian Traffic Few
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.330
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 45
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Few
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 21Segment STREET Franklin Avenue
FROM Reservoir Street TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 2,791 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:40 AM
50th Percentile Speed 29
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 25-34
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.40
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Towne, Garey, Stop @ San Antonio Crosswalks @ Towne, Garey, Mango Way, San Antonio
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.980
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 46
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Cemetery
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40,35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 22Segment STREET Franklin Avenue
FROM Garey Avenue TO White Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 2,329 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:04 PM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limi 30/35
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 3.36
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Park, White, Garey, Stop @ Bolivar Crosswalks @ All T.S., Bolivar
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.490
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 39
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Fremont High School
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35,30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 6.08
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Crash Rate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ White
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 25
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
25 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 23Segment STREET Fulton Road
FROM Bonita Avenue TO Arrow Highway
Average Daily Traffic 2,290 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/27/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:25 PM
50th Percentile Speed 29
85th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace Speed 25-34
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 57
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Bonita, Arrow
Crosswalks None
Pedestrian Traffic Few
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.530
Sidewalks Yes, W/S Only
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, RxR, Drainage Canal Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 24Segment STREET Garey Avenue
FROM North City Limits TO Bonita Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 13,564 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:35 AM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace Speed 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 30
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 1.07
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Foothill, Drake, Grove, Harrison, Bonita Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.130
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 82
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Business, Commercial, School Zone Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 12.62
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 25Segment STREET Garey Avenue
FROM Bonita Avenue TO La Verne Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 15,068 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:58 AM
50th Percentile Speed 35
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 25
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 1.23
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Bonita, Arrow, La Verne Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.740
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 83
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 2
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 4.70
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Magnolia
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 26Segment STREET Garey Avenue
FROM La Verne Avenue TO Willow Street
Average Daily Traffic 18,722 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:22 AM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 18
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 1.08
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median+TWLTL+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ La Verne, Willow, Aliso Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.490
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Business, Medical Offices, Church Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Ford
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 27Segment STREET Garey Avenue
FROM Willow Street TO Orange Grove Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 19,638 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:44
50th Percentile Speed 35
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 15
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 1.10
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Willow, Artesia, 10 Fwy WB, Orange Grove Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.380
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Business, Hospital, Medical Offices Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Artesia
Roadway Conditions Fair/PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 28Segment STREET Garey Avenue
FROM Orange Grove Avenue TO Holt Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 22,106 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:14 AM
50th Percentile Speed 35
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limi 40/35
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.42
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Alvarado, Holt, Orange Grove. Jefferson Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.710
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Business, Churches,Residential,School Zone Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40,35 2013: 40,35
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 4
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 3
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 47.48
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Alvarado
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 1 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 29Segment STREET Garey Avenue
FROM Holt Avenue TO Mission Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 20,461 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:33 AM
50th Percentile Speed 28
85th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.45
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Holt,Monterey,2nd,3rd,4th,Mission Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.480
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 73
Adjacent Land Use Downtown Pomona, Commercial, Business Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 30 2013: 30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 15.58
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Under RxR
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 25
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
25 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 30Segment STREET Garey Avenue
FROM Mission Boulevard TO Franklin Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 18,754 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:54 AM
50th Percentile Speed 33
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 18
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.53
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, 7th, 9th, 11th, Grand, Phillips, Beaver, Franklin Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.990
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Business, City Hall, Library, DMV,PUSD Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 24.22
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 1 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 31Segment STREET Garey Avenue
FROM Franklin Avenue TO County Road
Average Daily Traffic 18,933 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/14/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:31 PM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 43
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 1.26
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Franklin, Lexington, Philadelphia. Olive, County Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.990
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Business, Garey HS Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 3
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 2
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 14.12
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Fair/PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 1 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 32Segment STREET Garey Avenue
FROM County Road TO South City Limit
Average Daily Traffic 19,626 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/14/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:49 PM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.36
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ County,Market,60 Fwy EB+WB Crosswalks @ County, 60 Fwy WB
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.550
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Commercial,60 Fwy, 71 Fwy
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill (NB)
Horizontal Curve Yes @ County
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 33Segment STREET Grand Avenue
FROM East City Limit TO Reservoir Street
Average Daily Traffic 3,614 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/12/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:09 AM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.31
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Reservoir, Stop @ Signal St, East End Crosswalks @ Reservoir
Pedestrian Traffic Few
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.490
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 34Segment STREET Grand Avenue
FROM Reservoir Street TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 5,141 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/12/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:34 AM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.76
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Reservoir, Towne, Garey, Stop @ San Antonio, Palomares Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.980
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential, Park
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Good/FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 35Segment STREET Grand Avenue
FROM Garey Avenue TO Hansen Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 1,285 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/12/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:35 PM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 4.16
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Hamilton, White, Stop @ Park,Buena Vista, Huntington, Hansen Crosswalks @ Garey, Main,Park,White,Huntington,Hamilton Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.230
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Commercial,Residential,Park,School,Church Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 36Segment STREET Grove Street
FROM Towne Avenue TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 1,112 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/20/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:24 AM
50th Percentile Speed 23
85th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace Speed 19-28
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limi 25
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.74
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Stop @ Vamana, Mural, Towne Crosswalks @ Garey, Vamana, Towne
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.670
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 38
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 116

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 25 2013: 25
25 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Merrifield
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 37Segment STREET Grove Street
FROM Garey Avenue TO West City Limit
Average Daily Traffic 684 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/20/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:20 AM
50th Percentile Speed 26
85th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 59
Posted Speed Limi 25
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 3.81
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Stop @ Dawn View Crosswalks @ Garey, Dawn View
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.420
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Drainage Canal
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 99

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 25 2013: 25
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 0.00
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 38Segment STREET Hamilton Boulevard
FROM Orange Grove Avenue TO Mission Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 5,710 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/21/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.64
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Orange Grove, School Ped Xing, Holt, 2nd, Mission Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.900
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park, RxR, School Zone, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 30
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 3.22
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Previous Crash Rate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 39Segment STREET Hamilton Boulevard
FROM Mission Boulevard TO Phillips Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 4,831 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/21/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:38 AM
50th Percentile Speed 34
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.46
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, Grand, Stop @, 9th, Phillips Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.740
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School Zone, Churches,Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 10.46
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Maintain Uniformity
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Fair/PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 40Segment STREET Hamilton Boulevard
FROM Phillips Boulevard TO Lexington Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 2,350 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/21/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:46 AM
50th Percentile Speed 31
85th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.91
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Phillips, Colony
Crosswalks None
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.510
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 46
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 25 2013: 30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
Yes, 2007 Recommendation used. The speed limit is
reasonable and safe, was established with an E&TS
and no general purpose lanes were added
AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Density Residential District
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Lexington
Roadway Conditions Fair/PoorVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 41Segment STREET Harrison Avenue
FROM Towne Avenue TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 2,661 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/20/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:28 PM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.56
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Towne, Garey, Stop @ Sumner, Vamana Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.660
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 35
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, School Zone
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 30,35 2013: 30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Crash Rate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 42Segment STREET Holt Avenue
FROM Mills Avenue TO San Antonio Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 27,782 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:46 AM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 41
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.74
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ San Antonio,Reservoir, Clark, East End, Indian Hills, Mills, Via De Paseo Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.100
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 82
Adjacent Land Use Residential,Commercial, School Zone
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 7
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 5
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 36.45
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 43Segment STREET Holt Avenue
FROM San Antonio Avenue TO Hamilton Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 22,367 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:07 AM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 76
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 1.22
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ San Antonio, Towne, Palomares, Garey, Park, White, Hamilton Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.520
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Business, Church, Residential Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 4
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 3
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 16.13
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 44Segment STREET Holt Avenue
FROM Hamilton Boulevard TO Fairplex Drive
Average Daily Traffic 22,297 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:29 AM
50th Percentile Speed 34
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 83
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 1.50
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Hamilton, Lewis, Dudley, Erie, Union, Fairplex Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.360
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Church, Route 71, School Zone Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 5
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 3
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 17.91
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 45Segment STREET Humane Way
FROM Valley Boulevard TO Mission Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 11,033 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:18 PM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 10
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.75
Segment Crash Rate 0.80
Number of Lanes 2-5 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, Valley, Stop @ Roselawn Crosswalks @ Mission, Valley
Pedestrian Traffic Few
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.620
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 69
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, RxR, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 4.23
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve Yes, Under RxR
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Roselawn
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 46Segment STREET Indian Hill Boulevard
FROM American Avenue TO Holt Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 24,445 Date Counted 3/9/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:29 AM
50th Percentile Speed 37
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 55
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 1.12
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Holt, Kingsley, Lincoln, San Bernardino, Cobblestone, Amercia Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.100
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Commercial,Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 7
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 3
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 25.55
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Good/PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 47Segment STREET Kingsley Avenue
FROM East City Limit TO San Antonio Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 5,023 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/26/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:09 AM
50th Percentile Speed 22
85th Percentile Speed 26
10 mph Pace Speed 18-27
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limi 25/35
Total Crashes 23
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.22
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Indian Hills, Washington, San Antonio, Mills, Stop @ Karesh Crosswalks @ Indian Hills, Mills, Washington
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.130
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Elementary School, Church Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35,25
25 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 48Segment STREET La Verne Avenue
FROM Mountain Avenue TO Towne Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 5,759 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:39 AM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 11
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.41
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Towne, San Antonio, Stop @ Mountain Crosswalks @ All T.S.,Stop
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.740
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 10.46
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Towne
Roadway Conditions Good/PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 49Segment STREET La Verne Avenue
FROM Towne Avenue TO Arrow Highway
Average Daily Traffic 8,086 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace Speed 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 40/35
Total Crashes 11
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.61
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Orange Grove, Towne Crosswalks @ Garey, Luna Way, Orange Grove, Towne, Sharon Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.230
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Elementary School, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40,35 2013: 40,35
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.63
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Orange
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 40
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 50Segment STREET Lexington Avenue
FROM East City Limits TO Reservoir Street
Average Daily Traffic 1,087 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:37 PM
50th Percentile Speed 23
85th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace Speed 19-28
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limi 25
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.02
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Reservoir
Crosswalks None
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.250
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Commercial,RxR
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 157

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 25
25 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 51Segment STREET Lexington Avenue
FROM Reservoir Street TO Towne Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 1,460 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:37 PM
50th Percentile Speed 31
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.56
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Towne, Stop @Reservoir, San Antonio Crosswalks @ Towne
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.480
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Fire Department
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 52Segment STREET Lexington Avenue
FROM Towne Avenue TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 4,554 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:37 AM
50th Percentile Speed 34
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.01
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Towne
Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.480
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Cementery
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 53Segment STREET Lexington Avenue
FROM Garey Avenue TO Hamilton Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 6,191 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:32 AM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 4
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.48
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Park, White, Garey HS Crosswalks @ Garey, Park, Howsler, White, Garey HS
Pedestrian Traffic Heavy
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.740
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Elementary School, High School Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 30,25 2013: 30
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 54Segment STREET Lincoln Avenue
FROM East City Limit TO San Antonio Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 2,923 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/26/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:08 PM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace Speed 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.91
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Indian Hill, San Antonio, Stop @ Karesh, Mills, Sheridan, Washington Crosswalks @ Indian Hill, Karesh, Sheridan, Densmore, San Antonio, Washington Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.230
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church, Elementary School Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 30,25 2013: 30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes, @ Sheridan
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 55Segment STREET McKinley Avenue
FROM Towne Avenue TO Orange Grove Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 2,126 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/26/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:19 PM
50th Percentile Speed 27
85th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.01
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Orange Grove, Stop @ Towne, Palomares, Gibbs Crosswalks @ Orange Grove, Gibbs, Towne
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.510
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Palomares
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 56Segment STREET McKinley Avenue
FROM Orange Grove Avenue TO White Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 3,819 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/27/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 29
85th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace Speed 25-34
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.25
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ White, Garey, Orange Grove, Stop @ Park Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stop
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.570
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 49
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Garey
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 57Segment STREET McKinley Avenue
FROM White Avenue TO Fairplex Drive
Average Daily Traffic 5,637 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/27/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:01 AM
50th Percentile Speed 35
85th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 59
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 9
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.61
Segment Crash Rate 1.07
Number of Lanes 2-3 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ White, Fairplex
Crosswalks @ White
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.820
Sidewalks No
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 45
Adjacent Land Use Fairgrounds, Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Limited Sight Distance, Maintain Speed Uniformity
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 58Segment STREET Mission Boulevard
FROM East City Limit TO San Antonio Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 19,959 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:28 AM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 58
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 1.75
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ San Antonio, Reservoir, East End Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.910
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Business, Industrial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 4
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 2
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 20.78
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 59Segment STREET Mission Boulevard
FROM San Antonio Avenue TO Park Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 20,529 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:48 AM
50th Percentile Speed 35
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 27
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.74
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ San Antonio, Towne, Palomares, Garey, Main, Park Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.980
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Residential, City Hall, Police Dept, Business, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 4
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 2
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 17.33
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 60Segment STREET Mission Boulevard
FROM Park Avenue TO Dudley Street
Average Daily Traffic 22,969 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:11 AM
50th Percentile Speed 35
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limi 35/40
Total Crashes 78
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 1.69
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Park, White, Hamilton, Buena Vista, Dudley Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.100
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Business, Commercial, Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35,40 2013: 35,40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 2
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 2
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 22.82
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 1 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 61Segment STREET Mission Boulevard
FROM Dudley Street TO Humane Way
Average Daily Traffic 34,031 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:37 AM
50th Percentile Speed 42
85th Percentile Speed 49
10 mph Pace Speed 37-46
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 52
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 23
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.87
Segment Crash Rate 0.41
Number of Lanes 6 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Dudley, Curran, 71 SB+NB, Westmont, Humane Crosswalks @ Dudley, Curran, Humane, Westmont
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.910
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 109
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, Commercial, 71 Fwy Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 3
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 13.09
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve Yes, @ 71 Fwy
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Fleming
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 40
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
40 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 62Segment STREET Mission Boulevard
FROM Humane Way TO Temple Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 25,692 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:57 AM
50th Percentile Speed 43
85th Percentile Speed 52
10 mph Pace Speed 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 47
Posted Speed Limi 50
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.77
Segment Crash Rate 0.26
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Phillips, Temple, Francis, Humane Crosswalks @ Temple, Humane
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 1.000
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 66
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Hills, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 50 2013: 50
50 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 3.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 50 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill WB
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Phillips
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 45
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
45 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 63Segment STREET Monterey Avenue
FROM Reservoir Street TO San Antonio Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 1,417 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/26/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:19 AM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63
Posted Speed Limi 25
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 8.06
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Reservoir, Stop @ San Antonio Crosswalks @ San Antonio, Reservoir
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.240
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 25
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 21.83
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Crash Rate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 25
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
25 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 64Segment STREET Monterey Avenue
FROM San Antonio Avenue TO Palomares Street
Average Daily Traffic 1,417 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/26/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:19 AM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.32
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+Bike Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Towne, Stop @ San Antonio, Palomares Crosswalks @ San Antonio, Towne, Palomares
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.500
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, Church
Field Study By AC Checked By

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 2
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 2
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 29.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Crash Rate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 25
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
25 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 65Segment STREET Monterey Avenue
FROM Palomares Street TO Hamilton Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 4,099 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/26/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 29
85th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace Speed 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 11
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.50
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, White, Stop @ Hamilton, Main, Park, Palomares Crosswalks @ Garey, White, Main, Park, Palomares
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.980
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 54
Adjacent Land Use Residential,Churches,Industrial,Commercial,Post Office,City Yard,School Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35,30 2013: 35,30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 8.14
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 25
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
25 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 66Segment STREET Murchison Avenue
FROM Fairplex Drive TO Ridgeway Street
Average Daily Traffic 11,856 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/11/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:55 PM
50th Percentile Speed 37
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.61
Segment Crash Rate 0.53
Number of Lanes 2-4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Fairplex
Crosswalks @ Fairplex
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Few
Segment Length 0.700
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 53
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential, High School, 10 Fwy Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 3.86
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Fairplex
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 67Segment STREET Ninth Street
FROM East City Limit TO Reservoir Street
Average Daily Traffic 3,911 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/18/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:02 PM
50th Percentile Speed 27
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 20-29
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.23
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Reservoir, East End
Crosswalks @ Reservoir
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.570
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Industrial, Residential, RxR Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 68Segment STREET Ninth Street
FROM Reservoir Street TO White Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 7,189 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/18/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:44 AM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.26
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Reservoir, Towne, Garey, White, Stop @ San Antonio, Eleanor, Palomares, Park
Crosswalks @ Reservoir, Towne, Garey, White, San Antonio, Palomares Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.480
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 60
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church, School
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 69Segment STREET Ninth Street
FROM White Avenue TO Hansen Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 1,998 Date Counted 5/24/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/18/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:54 AM
50th Percentile Speed 31
85th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.22
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ White, Stop @ Hamilton, Buena Vista Crosswalks @ White, Hamilton
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.740
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 63
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church, Commercial, Park, School Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Fair/PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 70Segment STREET North Ranch Road
FROM Route 71 TO Village Loop Road
Average Daily Traffic 678 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/8/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:11 PM
50th Percentile Speed 31
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.31
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Village Loop, Rock Bluff Crosswalks @ Sage Canyon, Village Loop
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.350
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways No
Lighting Yes
Width 41
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Route 71
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 112

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill SB
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 71Segment STREET Old Pomona Road
FROM Route 71 TO Village Loop Road
Average Daily Traffic 870 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/14/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:20 PM
50th Percentile Speed 34
85th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 55
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.50
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+Raised Median+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Village Loop, Rising Hill Crosswalks @ All Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.420
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways No
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Route 71
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 128

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill WB
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 72Segment STREET Olive Street
FROM Reservoir Street TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 2,584 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/7/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:50 PM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.65
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Towne, Garey, Stop @ Palomares, San Antonio, Reservoir Crosswalks @ Towne, Palomares, Garey, Angela
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.980
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 43
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Business, Church, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35,30 2013: 30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 8.14
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Uncontrolled X-Walks, High Density Residential
District
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Fair/PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 25
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
25 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 73Segment STREET Orange Grove Avenue
FROM Arrow Highway TO La Verne Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 7,077 Date Counted 5/24/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:54 AM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.83
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Arrow, Bangor, La Verne Crosswalks @ All T.S., Deborah
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.560
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Church, Park
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Maintain Uniformity, School Age Ped Demand,
Uncontrolled X-Walk
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 74Segment STREET Orange Grove Avenue
FROM La Verne Avenue TO McKinley Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 8,430 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:40 PM
50th Percentile Speed 33
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.34
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ La Verne, San Rafael, Artesia, McKinley, PedXing Hospital Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.580
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Hospital, Medical Offices, School Zone Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 75Segment STREET Orange Grove Avenue
FROM McKinley Avenue TO White Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 14,453 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:32 PM
50th Percentile Speed 33
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 17
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 1.09
Number of Lanes 2-4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ McKinley, Garey, Park, White Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.590
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church, Commercial, School Zone Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ McKinley
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 76Segment STREET Orange Grove Avenue
FROM White Avenue TO Lewis Street
Average Daily Traffic 9,511 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:57 PM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 22
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.15
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ White, Hamilton
Crosswalks @ White, Huntington, Hamilton, Lewis
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.590
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Church
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 12.86
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes@Huntington
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 77Segment STREET Orange Grove Avenue
FROM Lewis Street TO Fairplex Drive
Average Daily Traffic 8,977 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:18 PM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 31
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.72
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Weber, Dudley, Glen, Fairplex Crosswalks @ All T.S., Lewis
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.100
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 61
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 7.36
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Crash Rate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 78Segment STREET Palomares Street
FROM McKinley Avenue TO Holt Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 2,632 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/21/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:09 PM
50th Percentile Speed 27
85th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limi 25
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.31
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Holt, Stop @ Alvarado, Jefferson, McKinley, Lincoln Crosswalks @ Jefferson, Holt, Lincoln
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.670
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 45
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Lincoln Park
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 25 2013: 25
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ McKinley
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 79Segment STREET Palomares Street
FROM Holt Avenue TO Mission Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 4,082 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/21/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:30 PM
50th Percentile Speed 23
85th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace Speed 18-27
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81
Posted Speed Limi 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, 2nd, 1st, Holt, RXR, Stop @ 3rd, Monterey Crosswalks @ Mission, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, Holt, Monterey Btwn 1st & 2nd Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.490
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, University, Industrial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 25 2013: 25
25 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 80Segment STREET Palomares Street
FROM Mission Boulevard TO Franklin Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 2,748 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/21/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:45 PM
50th Percentile Speed 28
85th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 61
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.61
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, Stop @ Phillips, Grand, 9th, Franklin Crosswalks @ Mission, 9th, Phillips
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.990
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 81Segment STREET Park Avenue
FROM Garey Avenue TO Orange Grove Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 4,367 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:58 PM
50th Percentile Speed 30
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.91
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Orange Grove, Stop @ McKinley, Garey Crosswalks @ Orange Grove, McKinley, Garey
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.460
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Senior Living Facility, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Preciado
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 82Segment STREET Park Avenue
FROM Orange Grove Avenue TO Holt Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 4,752 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:53 PM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 11
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.08
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Partial Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Holt, Orange Grove, Stop@ Alvarado Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.610
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 28.87
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 83Segment STREET Park Avenue
FROM Holt Avenue TO Mission Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 5,942 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:18 PM
50th Percentile Speed 28
85th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.38
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Partial Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Holt, Mission, Stop @ Monterey, 2nd, 3rd Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.480
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use Residential, RxR, Downtown Pomona
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 84Segment STREET Park Avenue
FROM Mission Boulevard TO Rio Rancho Road
Average Daily Traffic 9,670 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:55 PM
50th Percentile Speed 35
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 17
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.66
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Rio Rancho, Lexington, Franklin, Phillips, 6th, Mission, Stop @ Grand, 9th Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.460
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Fire Station, City Hall, Police Dept,School Zone,Health Center Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 85Segment STREET Philadelphia Street
FROM East City Limit TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 10,228 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/8/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 37
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 20
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.89
Number of Lanes 2-4 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Reservoir, San Antonio, Towne, School Ent, Garey Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.210
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School Zone, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Reservoir
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 86Segment STREET Phillips Boulevard
FROM East City Limit TO Reservoir Street
Average Daily Traffic 4,278 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 31
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 59
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.89
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Reservoir
Crosswalks @ Reservoir
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.430
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 69
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 87Segment STREET Phillips Boulevard
FROM Reservoir Street TO Garey Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 5,105 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/12/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:53 PM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limi 35/40
Total Crashes 9
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.99
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+Bike Lane+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Towne, Reservoir, Packard, Garey, Stop @ Palomares, San Antonio Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.980
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, School Zone, Church Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35,40
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 88Segment STREET Phillips Boulevard
FROM Garey Avenue TO Hamilton Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 5,595 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/12/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:16 PM
50th Percentile Speed 34
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.87
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Garey, Park, White, Stop @ Hamilton, Main Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.790
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 40
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Calfornia MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 89Segment STREET Phillips Boulevard
FROM Hamilton Boulevard TO Hansen Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 5,926 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/12/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:36 PM
50th Percentile Speed 40
85th Percentile Speed 47
10 mph Pace Speed 37-46
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 54
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 10
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 1.97
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Hamilton
Crosswalks @ Hamilton
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.470
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 74
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

High Crash Rate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Prospect
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 90Segment STREET Phillips Ranch Road
FROM Village Loop Road TO Scenic Ridge Drive
Average Daily Traffic 19,064 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/8/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:37 AM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.65
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Village Loop, 60 Fwy + EB, Scenic Ridge, Rio Rancho Crosswalks @ Village Loop, Rio Rancho, Scenic Ridge
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.530
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways No
Lighting Yes
Width 88
Adjacent Land Use Residential, 60 Fwy, School Zone
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill SB
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 91Segment STREET Pomona Boulevard
FROM Route 71 TO Temple Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 8,463 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:49 PM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 55
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 18
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.77
Segment Crash Rate 0.72
Number of Lanes 2-4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Temple
Crosswalks @ Temple
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.620
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 63
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Commercial, 71+57 Fwy, RxR Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 5.32
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Humane
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 40
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
40 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 92Segment STREET Pomona Boulevard
FROM Temple Avenue TO Valley Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 15,529 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:18 PM
50th Percentile Speed 39
85th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace Speed 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.77
Segment Crash Rate 0.53
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Temple, Valley
Crosswalks @ Temple, Valley
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.400
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 63
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Commercial, Business, Agricultural Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 0.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Valley
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 93Segment STREET Reservoir Street
FROM Holt Avenue TO Mission Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 11,310 Date Counted 3/9/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:57 AM
50th Percentile Speed 33
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 4
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.40
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Holt, Price, Mission
Crosswalks @ Holt, Mission, 2nd, Monterey
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.480
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, Business
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 15.58
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve Yes, Underpass
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 94Segment STREET Reservoir Street
FROM Mission Boulevard TO Franklin Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 19,342 Date Counted 3/9/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:29 AM
50th Percentile Speed 37
85th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 66
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 1.89
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, 9th, Grand, Phillips, Franklin Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.990
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 60
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church, Business, Industrial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35,40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 2
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 20.19
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 95Segment STREET Reservoir Street
FROM Franklin Avenue TO South City Limit
Average Daily Traffic 23,965 Date Counted 3/9/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 41
85th Percentile Speed 48
10 mph Pace Speed 37-46
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 58
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 32
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.53
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL+Partial Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Franklin, Philadelphia, County, 60 Fwy EB+ WB Crosswalks @ Franklin, Philadelphia, County, 60 Fwy WB
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.380
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, Business, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 2
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 7.52
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 40
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
40 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 96Segment STREET Ridgeway Street
FROM Murchison Avenue TO Valley Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 8,022 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:57 PM
50th Percentile Speed 33
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.42
Number of Lanes 2-4 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Valley, South Campus
Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.490
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 47
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Industrial, 10 Fwy Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 97Segment STREET Rio Rancho Road
FROM Garey Avenue TO Route 71 South Bound
Average Daily Traffic 25,558 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/8/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:34 AM
50th Percentile Speed 34
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 37
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 1.42
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Route 71 SB+ NB, Rancho Valley, Park, Garey Crosswalks @ Route 71 NB, Rancho Valley, Park, Garey
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.560
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 69
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Route 71
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 5.57
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill WB
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Park
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 98Segment STREET Rio Rancho Road
FROM Route 71 South Bound TO Phillips Ranch Road
Average Daily Traffic 16,228 Date Counted 4/20/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/8/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:03AM
50th Percentile Speed 41
85th Percentile Speed 46
10 mph Pace Speed 37-46
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 11
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.37
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Route 71 SB/ Lone Ridge, Rancho Camino, Phillips Crosswalks @ Lone Ridge, Phillips
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 1.000
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 85
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Route 71, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Limited Sight Distance
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill WB
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Meadow
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 99Segment STREET Riverside Drive
FROM East City Limit TO West City Limit
Average Daily Traffic 21,494 Date Counted 5/24/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/7/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:25 AM
50th Percentile Speed 43
85th Percentile Speed 49
10 mph Pace Speed 38-47
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 62
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.77
Segment Crash Rate 0.00
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Towne
Crosswalks @ Towne
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.210
Sidewalks No
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 72
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 100Segment STREET San Antonio Avenue
FROM Towne Avenue TO Lincoln Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 15,278 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:30 AM
50th Percentile Speed 35
85th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 14
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.45
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Towne, San Bernardino, La Verne, Lincoln Crosswalks @ All T.S., Barfield Elem, Collingwood
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.110
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park, Church, School Zone Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Hidden Dwys, Uncontrolled Crosswalks, Maintain
Uniformity
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Towne
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 101Segment STREET San Antonio Avenue
FROM Lincoln Avenue TO Holt Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 14,917 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/18/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:50 PM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.40
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Holt, Kingsley, Lincoln Crosswalks @All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.550
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Fire Station, Church, School, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 4.64
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 102Segment STREET San Antonio Avenue
FROM Holt Avenue TO Mission Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 10,828 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/18/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:22 PM
50th Percentile Speed 33
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.21
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, 1St, Holt, RXR Crosswalks @ Mission, 1st, Holt
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.490
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Residential, RxR, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 21.41
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Holt
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 103Segment STREET San Antonio Avenue
FROM Mission Boulevard TO Phillips Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 5,559 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/18/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:51 PM
50th Percentile Speed 31
85th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.68
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, Stop @ Phillips, Grand, 9th Crosswalks @ All T.S., Stops
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.730
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park, School Zone
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Fair/GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 104Segment STREET San Antonio Avenue
FROM Phillips Boulevard TO Philadelphia Street
Average Daily Traffic 4,293 Date Counted 4/27/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/18/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:10 PM
50th Percentile Speed 33
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.35
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Philadelphia, Stop @ Franklin, Lexington, Phillips Crosswalks @ Philadelphia, Franklin, Phillips
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.730
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School Zone
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 105Segment STREET San Bernardino Avenue
FROM Mills Avenue TO Towne Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 17,300 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/26/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:58 PM
50th Percentile Speed 34
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 14
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.27
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mills, Indian Hills, San Antonio, Towne Crosswalks @ Mills, Indian Hills, Washington, San Antonio, Towne, PedXing Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.660
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church, School Zone, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 11.24
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 30
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
30 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 1 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 106Segment STREET Santa Clara Drive
FROM Village Loop Road TO Avenida Rancheros
Average Daily Traffic 12,243 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/8/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:42 AM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.12
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Partial Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Avenida Rancheros, Trabuco, Village Loop Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.380
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 50
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Elem School, Park
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill EB
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 107Segment STREET Second Street
FROM Park Avenue TO Oak Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 1,728 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/17/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:33 PM
50th Percentile Speed 29
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 61
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.19
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Hamilton, White, Stop @ Buena Vista, Park Crosswalks @ Hamilton, White, Park
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.870
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 51
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 108Segment STREET Second Street
FROM Oak Avenue TO Route 71
Average Daily Traffic 1,502 Date Counted 4/18/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/17/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:49 PM
50th Percentile Speed 29
85th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 53
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 3.50
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Curran
Crosswalks None
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.730
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 45
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, Commercial, School Zone Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Curran
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 109Segment STREET South Campus Drive
FROM Ridgeway Street TO East Campus Drive
Average Daily Traffic 8,281 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/11/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:11 PM
50th Percentile Speed 35
85th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.77
Segment Crash Rate 0.11
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Ridgeway, Corporate W + E, 10 Fwy NB, E Campus Crosswalks @ Ridgeway, Corporate E, E Campus
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.580
Sidewalks No
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Business, 10 Fwy, 71 Fwy, 57 Fwy, Industrial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 0.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 110Segment STREET South Campus Drive
FROM East Campus Drive TO Kellogg Drive
Average Daily Traffic 11,267 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/11/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:39 AM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.77
Segment Crash Rate 0.41
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ East Campus, Kellogg
Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.600
Sidewalks No
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 61
Adjacent Land Use Cal Poly Agriculture, Drainage Canal
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 0.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes@ E.Campus
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 111Segment STREET South Campus Drive
FROM Kellogg Drive TO Temple Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 21,120 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/11/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:14 AM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace Speed 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.93
Segment Crash Rate 0.10
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Kellogg, Temple
Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.270
Sidewalks No
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Cal Poly
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: N/A
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 2
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 7.41
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 112Segment STREET Temple Avenue
FROM Rancho Navato Drive TO Pomona Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 32,811 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/11/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:04 AM
50th Percentile Speed 40
85th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace Speed 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 32
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.87
Segment Crash Rate 0.47
Number of Lanes 6 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Mission, 57 Fwy NB + SB, Univ Tech Ent, Fire Station, Pomona, Rancho Navato
Crosswalks @Mission,Univ Tech Ent,Fire Station,Pomona,51 Fwy SB, Rancho Navato Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 1.140
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 90
Adjacent Land Use Fire Station, Commercial, 57 Fwy, Business, Industrial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill WB
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 113Segment STREET Temple Avenue
FROM Pomona Boulevard TO West City Limit
Average Daily Traffic 31,402 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/11/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:37 AM
50th Percentile Speed 39
85th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64%
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.87
Segment Crash Rate 0.23
Number of Lanes 4-6 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Pomona, Valley, S.Campus, S.University Crosswalks @ Pomona, Valley, S.Campus, S.University
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.620
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 90
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Cal Poly, Agriculture, Business Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill WB
Horizontal Curve Yes@ S.Campus
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 114Segment STREET Towne Avenue
FROM Foothill Boulevard TO Bonita Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 25,391 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:37 AM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 11
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.33
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Bonita, Harrison, Foothill, Amador Crosswalks @ Bonita, Harrison, Foothill, Amador
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.720
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 79
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 11.72
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 115Segment STREET Towne Avenue
FROM Bonita Avenue TO Arrow Highway
Average Daily Traffic 28,828 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:22 AM
50th Percentile Speed 34
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 19
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.93
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Bonita, Arrow
Crosswalks All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.390
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use Business, Commercial, Industrial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 116Segment STREET Towne Avenue
FROM Arrow Highway TO San Bernardino Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 27,983 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/24/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:05 AM
50th Percentile Speed 37
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 32
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.63
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ San Bernardino, 10 Fwy EB, Vinton, La Verne, Bangor, San Antonio, Arrow Crosswalks @ San Bernardino, Vinton, La Verne, Bangor, San Antonio, Arrow Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.000
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, School Zone, Church, Residential Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 8.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes@ Arrow
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 117Segment STREET Towne Avenue
FROM San Bernardino Avenue TO Holt Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 22,759 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:22 PM
50th Percentile Speed 37
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 14
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.38
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Holt, Kingsley, Alvarado, Lincoln, San Bernardino Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.890
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, School Zone, Church, Residential Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 118Segment STREET Towne Avenue
FROM Holt Avenue TO Second Street
Average Daily Traffic 20,987 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:59PM
50th Percentile Speed 33
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 4
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.35
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ 2nd, Monterey, Holt
Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.300
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Church, Commercial, Industrial, Business Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Under RxR
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 119Segment STREET Towne Avenue
FROM Second Street TO Grand Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 19,280 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:36 PM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.21
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Grand, 9th, Mission, 2nd, 3rd Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.670
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Park
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Fair/PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 120Segment STREET Towne Avenue
FROM Grand Avenue TO Lexington Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 18,094 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/19/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:17PM
50th Percentile Speed 39
85th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.49
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Grand, Phillips, Ped@ Ascott, Franklin, Lexington Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.740
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Cemetery, School Zone
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 10.46
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 121Segment STREET Towne Avenue
FROM Lexington Avenue TO County Road
Average Daily Traffic 14,001 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/14/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:14 PM
50th Percentile Speed 37
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.32
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Lexington, Philadelphia, Olive, County Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.730
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 75
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 3.74
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 122Segment STREET Towne Avenue
FROM County Road TO South City Limit
Average Daily Traffic 12,253 Date Counted 5/2/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/14/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:39 PM
50th Percentile Speed 36
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 57
Posted Speed Limi 40
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.48
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ County, Riverside, Market Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.470
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 84
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, 60 Fwy, Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Riverside Dr
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 123Segment STREET Valley Boulevard
FROM Fairplex Drive TO Pomona Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic 18,010 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:36 PM
50th Percentile Speed 46
85th Percentile Speed 53
10 mph Pace Speed 40-49
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 40
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.77
Segment Crash Rate 0.56
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+TWLTL+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Pomona, Temple, Kellogg, Omar, Ridgeway, Fairplex, Humane Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 2.170
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 60
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial, Business, Cal Poly, 71 Fwy Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40,45 2013: 40,45
50 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 4
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 2
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 13.90
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 40 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @Ridgeway
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 45
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
40 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 124Segment STREET Valley Boulevard
FROM Pomona Boulevard TO West City Limit
Average Daily Traffic 31,293 Date Counted 4/11/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/10/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:59 PM
50th Percentile Speed 43
85th Percentile Speed 49
10 mph Pace Speed 39-48
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 16
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.93
Segment Crash Rate 0.39
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Pomona
Crosswalks @ Pomona
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Few
Segment Length 0.710
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 83
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Business, Industrial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @West End
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes, Truck Route
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 125Segment STREET Val Vista Street
FROM Loma Vista Street TO Gillette Street
Average Daily Traffic 1,831 Date Counted 4/13/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/27/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:50 AM
50th Percentile Speed 28
85th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.02
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Gillette, Crest, Cleveland, Loma Vista Crosswalks @ Crest, Cleveland, Loma Vista
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.880
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 30
30 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 4.27
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 30 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes @Gillette
Roadway Conditions PoorVisibility Fair
Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 25
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
25 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 126Segment STREET Village Loop Road
FROM Phillips Ranch Road TO Old Pomona Road
Average Daily Traffic 3,057 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/14/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:55 AM
50th Percentile Speed 32
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 60
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Phillips Ranch, Stop @ Old Pomona Crosswalks @ Phillips Ranch, Knollview, Canyon Rim, Old Pomona Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.380
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Fire Station, Commercial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 127Segment STREET Village Loop Road
FROM Old Pomona Road TO North Ranch Road
Average Daily Traffic 2,668 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 4/14/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 23
85th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace Speed 17-26
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limi 25
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 1.05
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+Raised Median+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Old Pomona, View Point, North Ranch Crosswalks @ Old Pomona, View Point, Bear Valley
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.390
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 63
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School Zone, Hills
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 25 2013: 25
25 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve Yes, Uphill NB
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 128Segment STREET Village Loop Road
FROM North Ranch Road TO Santa Clara Drive
Average Daily Traffic 1,178 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/8/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:16 PM
50th Percentile Speed 26
85th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace Speed 21-30
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limi 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes+Bike Lane
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Santa Clara, Los Felis, North Ranch, Mill Valley Crosswalks @ Santa Clara
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.530
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 41
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 25 2013: 25
25 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Residence District
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 129Segment STREET Village Loop Road
FROM Santa Clara Drive TO Phillips Ranch Road
Average Daily Traffic 15,719 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/8/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:13 AM
50th Percentile Speed 39
85th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace Speed 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.64
Segment Crash Rate 0.35
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Phillips Ranch, Santa Clara, Rustic Glen, Stop @ Old Wood Crosswalks @ Phillips Ranch, Rustic Glen, Old Wood, Santa Clara Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.800
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways No
Lighting Yes
Width 60
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community No
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Limited Sight Distance, Maintain Uniformity
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Limited Sight Distance Truck Traffic No
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 130Segment STREET Walnut Avenue
FROM East City Limit TO Ficus Street
Average Daily Traffic 2,341 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/7/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:42 AM
50th Percentile Speed 22
85th Percentile Speed 28
10 mph Pace Speed 16-25
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limi 30
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.07
Segment Crash Rate 2.13
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Reservoir
Crosswalks None
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.330
Sidewalks Partial
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 48
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Industrial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 196

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 30
25 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 1.00
No, Recommendation Lower than Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 25 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Very PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Heavy
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 131Segment STREET White Avenue
FROM North City Limit TO McKinley Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 25,664 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed 47
85th Percentile Speed 52
10 mph Pace Speed 42-51
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limi 45
Total Crashes 19
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.87
Segment Crash Rate 0.44
Number of Lanes 6 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ McKinley, Fairplex Gate 5, Gate 7, Gate 9 Crosswalks @ McKinley, Gate 5
Pedestrian Traffic No
On-Street Parking No
Segment Length 0.920
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Few
Lighting Yes
Width 84
Adjacent Land Use Fair Grounds, Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 45 2013: 45
50 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 45 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 132Segment STREET White Avenue
FROM McKinley Avenue TO Orange Grove Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 19,187 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:25 AM
50th Percentile Speed 39
85th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace Speed 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 40/35
Total Crashes 14
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.75
Segment Crash Rate 0.73
Number of Lanes 4-6 Lanes+Raised Median
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ Orange Grove, Preciado, McKinley Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.550
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 97
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Park, 10 Fwy Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 40 2013: 40,35
45 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 5.64
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes @ Preciado
Roadway Conditions GoodVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 40
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 133Segment STREET White Avenue
FROM Orange Grove Avenue TO Second Street
Average Daily Traffic 20,114 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:46 AM
50th Percentile Speed 38
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 4
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.13
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ 2nd, Monterey, Holt, Fire Station, Alvarado, Orange Grove Crosswalks @ 2nd, Monterey, Orange Grove, Holt
Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 0.810
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Business
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
40 mph
mph
Safety Corridor Yes
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 1
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 1
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population No
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 9.64
Yes, 2013 E&T Recommendation Used. The speed
limit is reasonable and safe, was established with an
E&TS and no general purpose lanes were added.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

California MUTCD Option 2
Vertical Curve Yes, Under RxR
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions FairVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation 35
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

Meets Safety Corridor Designation per CVC Section
22358.7
35 Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023
RECOMMENDATION PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 2024 RECOMMENDATION AFTER JUNE 30, 2024 Engineer's Recommendation
Engineer's Justification:

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation
mph
mph
8/17/2023

CITY OF POMONA 2023 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 134Segment STREET White Avenue
FROM Second Street TO Lexington Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 17,631 Date Counted 4/25/2023
Date of Speed Survey 3/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:06 AM
50th Percentile Speed 33
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limi 35
Total Crashes 23
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.66
Segment Crash Rate 0.50
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Type of Traffic Control Signal @ 2nd, Mission, 9th, Grand, Phillips, Franklin, Lexington Crosswalks @ All T.S.

Pedestrian Traffic Yes
On-Street Parking Yes
Segment Length 1.430
Sidewalks Yes
Driveways Yes
Lighting Yes
Width 67
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Church, School Zone Field Study By AC Checked By NS

CERTIFICATION DATE
Number of Survey Samples 200

SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY

TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Pomona was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
Crashes/MVM1/1/2018 - 12/31/2022
feet
miles
mph
mph
Crashes/MVM
Previous Speed Limits 2007: 35 2013: 35
35 mph
mph
Safety Corridor No
Total Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Speed Related Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
Ped/Bike Fatal+Severe Crashes 0
DUI Fatal + Severe Crashes 0
Disadvantaged Community Yes
Vulnerable Population Yes
Safety Corridor Factor Threshold 2.00
Safety Corridor Factor 2.00
No, Recommendation Same as Previous E&TS.

AB 43 used to set existing or previous speed limit:

City's Speed Limit Recommendation 35 mph
Engineer's Justification:

Closest To 85th Speed
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Roadway Conditions Good/PoorVisibility Good
Truck Traffic Yes
%
mph
TR2933
Engineer's Recommendation
Fatal + Severe Crashes Near a School During School Hour 0 8/24/2023

RECOMMENDATION
No Change through the 2024 Amendment. This
segment does not Meet the Safety Corridor
Designation per CVC Section 22358.7
8/17/2023

2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF POMONA

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms

DATE:04/26/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:12:12PM 2:03PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SAN ANTONIO AVE AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:690 ALVARADO ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 31 30 31 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 26 25 26 M.P.H.
37 XX 0 2 2
36 XX 1 1 2 15TH %: 22 21 22 M.P.H.
35 XXX 3 0 3
34 XX 2 0 2 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 21 - 30 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 XXXX 3 1 4
32 XXXXX 2 3 5 % IN PACE: 75% 75% 75%
31 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 * % OVER PACE: 14% 13% 11%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 4 13 P % UNDER PACE: 11% 12% 15%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 10 19 A
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 C ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 26 26 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 11 22 E
24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 11 21 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23 21 22 23 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 *
22 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10
20 XXX 0 3 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.23 0.21 0.11
19 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9
18 XX 0 2 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.46 0.33 M.P.H. 17 XX 1 1 2
16 XX 1 1 2
15 X 1 0 1
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

ALVARADO STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/20/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:3:27PM 3:49PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:MAPLE AVE/ARROW HWY
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 X 0 1 1
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 0 1 1
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 0 0 0
50 XXXX 2 2 4
49 XXX 1 2 3
48 XXXXX 1 4 5
47 XXXXX 3 2 5
46 XXXXXXX 1 6 7
45 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 4 14 *
44 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 *
43 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 12 21 P
41 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 A
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 7 17 C 85TH %: 45 46 45 M.P.H. 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 13 24 E
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 * 50TH %: 40 41 41 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 * 15TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
35 XXXXX 4 1 5
34 XXXX 2 2 4 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 36 - 45 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 XXX 1 2 3
32 XXXXXX 4 2 6 % IN PACE: 80% 74% 77%
31 X 1 0 1
30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 8% 19% 14%
29 0 0 0
28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 12% 7% 10%
27 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40 42 41 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17 23 20
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.17 0.23 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.42 0.48 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

ARROW HIGHWAY
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/20/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:3:07PM 3:21PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GAREY AVE AND WEST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:293 ARROW HWY
63 0 0 0
62 X 1 0 1
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 0 1 1
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 X 1 0 1
57 X 1 0 1 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 1 0 1
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 XX 2 0 2
51 XXX 2 1 3
50 XXXXX 2 3 5
49 XXXXXX 4 2 6
48 XXXXXX 2 4 6
47 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
46 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
45 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 *
44 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 P
43 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 12 20 A EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 9 18 C
41 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 11 20 E
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 12 22 * 85TH %: 48 47 47 M.P.H. 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 *
38 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 * 50TH %: 42 42 42 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXX 3 3 6
36 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 15TH %: 37 38 38 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXX 5 1 6
34 XXX 2 1 3 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 38 - 47 38 - 47 M.P.H. 33 XX 1 1 2
32 X 1 0 1 % IN PACE: 67% 78% 73%
31 X 0 1 1
30 0 0 0 % OVER PACE: 16% 11% 14%
29 0 0 0
28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 17% 11% 14%
27 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 42 42 42 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31 19 25
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.19 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.56 0.43 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

ARROW HIGHWAY
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/11/23 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD:9:30AM 10:01AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SANTA CLARA DR AND RANCHO NAVATO DR 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:RANCHO NAVATO DR/AVENIDA RANCHEROS 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 XX 0 2 2
48 XXX 1 2 3
47 XXXXXXXXX 2 7 9
46 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
45 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 10 14 *
44 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 *
43 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 11 20 P EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 9 19 A
41 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 C
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 6 16 E 85TH %: 44 46 45 M.P.H. 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 10 22 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 6 15 * 50TH %: 40 42 41 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
36 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 15TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXX 2 5 7
34 XXX 1 2 3 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 38 - 47 37 - 46 M.P.H. 33 XXX 2 1 3
32 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 % IN PACE: 80% 75% 77%
31 X 1 0 1
30 X 1 0 1 % OVER PACE: 3% 5% 8%
29 X 1 0 1
28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 17% 20% 16%
27 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40 41 41 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 18 18
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.18 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.40 0.43 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

AVENIDA RANCHEROS
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/20/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:2:26PM 2:42PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:ARBOR WAY/BONITA AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 0 0 0
50 X 1 0 1
49 X 1 0 1
48 XXX 2 1 3
47 XXXX 2 2 4
46 XXXXX 1 4 5
45 XXXXXXX 0 7 7
44 XXXXXXXXX 1 8 9 *
43 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 13 21 *
41 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 9 20 P
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 A 85TH %: 43 45 44 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 14 9 23 C
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 8 21 E 50TH %: 39 41 40 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 * 15TH %: 35 37 36 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
34 XXXX 4 0 4 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 36 - 45 35 - 44 M.P.H. 33 XXX 3 0 3
32 XX 1 1 2 % IN PACE: 83% 84% 81%
31 XX 2 0 2
30 XXX 1 2 3 % OVER PACE: 8% 9% 12%
29 X 1 0 1
28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 9% 7% 8%
27 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 41 40 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 16 18
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.16 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.40 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

BONITA AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/20/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:2:46PM 3:02PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GAREY AVE AND WEST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:METROPOLITAN ST/BONITA AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 X 0 1 1 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 1 0 1
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 X 0 1 1
47 XXXXX 4 1 5
46 XXX 1 2 3
45 XXXXXX 5 1 6
44 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
43 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 4 16 *
41 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 *
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 7 20 P 85TH %: 43 42 43 M.P.H. 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 8 18 A
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 6 17 C 50TH %: 40 37 39 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 E
36 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 15TH %: 35 33 34 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 10 16 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 11 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 34 - 43 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXX 2 4 6
32 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 % IN PACE: 78% 72% 75%
31 XXX 0 3 3
30 XX 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 11% 10% 13%
29 XX 1 1 2
28 XX 1 1 2 % UNDER PACE: 11% 18% 13%
27 X 0 1 1
26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 37 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 27 23
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.27 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.42 0.52 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

BONITA AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE:03/07/23 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD:1:50PM 2:41PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RESERVOIR ST AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:445 COUNTY RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 XXX 1 2 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXX 3 0 3
41 XXXXXX 3 3 6
40 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 85TH %: 39 38 39 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 50TH %: 34 32 32 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXX 5 2 7
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 3 14 * 15TH %: 28 27 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 *
34 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 P
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 A % IN PACE: 65% 65% 63%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 8 18 C
30 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 E % OVER PACE: 8% 21% 26%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 * % UNDER PACE: 27% 14% 12%
27 XXXXXXXXX 2 7 9 *
26 XXXX 3 1 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 32 33 M.P.H.
25 XXXX 1 3 4
24 XXX 2 1 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 29 32 31
23 XX 0 2 2
22 XX 1 1 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 XXXX 1 3 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.32 0.16
19 XXXXX 2 3 5
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.54 0.57 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

COUNTY ROAD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY

ECL AND GAREY AVE

EAST CITY LIMIT AND GAREY AVE
DATE:04/27/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:12:51PM 1:14PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GILLETTE RD AND HOLT AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1201 DUDLEY ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 1 0 1
49 0 0 0
48 X 0 1 1
47 0 0 0
46 XXXXX 1 4 5
45 XXXXX 3 2 5
44 XX 2 0 2
43 XXXX 3 1 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXX 2 3 5
41 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
40 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * 85TH %: 41 40 41 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 P 50TH %: 36 34 36 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 A
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 C 15TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 E
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 30 - 39 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 6 15 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 * % IN PACE: 69% 67% 66%
31 XXXXXXX 2 5 7
30 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 % OVER PACE: 13% 19% 12%
29 XXXXXX 3 3 6
28 XXXXX 2 3 5 % UNDER PACE: 18% 14% 23%
27 XXX 1 2 3
26 XX 0 2 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 35 35 M.P.H.
25 XX 1 1 2
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 31 33
23 XXX 1 2 3
22 XX 2 0 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.34 0.31 0.16
19 X 0 1 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.58 0.56 0.40 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

DUDLEY STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/25/23 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD:3:48PM 4:10PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MISSION BLVD AND PHILIPS BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:600 DUDLEY ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 28 30 29 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 25 25 25 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 XX 0 2 2 15TH %: 20 22 21 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0
34 XXX 1 2 3 10 MPH PACE: 19 - 28 22 - 31 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 XX 1 1 2
32 XXXX 1 3 4 % IN PACE: 79% 79% 78%
31 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
30 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * % OVER PACE: 13% 8% 6%
29 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 P % UNDER PACE: 8% 13% 17%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 A
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 8 21 C ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 26 25 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 15 11 26 E
24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 11 22 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 18 16 23 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 *
22 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 9 16 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
20 XXXXX 3 2 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.17 0.08
19 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9
18 XXXXX 4 1 5 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.38 0.42 0.29 M.P.H. 17 XXXX 3 1 4
16 X 1 0 1
15 XX 0 2 2
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

DUDLEY STREET
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/12/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 9:27AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HOLT AVE AND MISSION BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:247 EAST END AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 XX 2 0 2
50 X 0 1 1
49 X 0 1 1
48 XX 1 1 2
47 XXX 1 2 3
46 X 0 1 1
45 XXX 1 2 3
44 XXX 0 3 3
43 XXXXXX 4 2 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
41 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 *
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 10 14 * 85TH %: 41 42 42 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 P
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 A 50TH %: 36 37 36 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 C
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 9 18 E 15TH %: 29 30 29 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 6 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 *
32 XXXXXX 3 3 6 % IN PACE: 62% 65% 64%
31 XXXXXX 4 2 6
30 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 % OVER PACE: 9% 14% 12%
29 XXXXXX 5 1 6
28 XX 1 1 2 % UNDER PACE: 29% 21% 25%
27 XXX 2 1 3
26 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 36 36 M.P.H.
25 XXX 1 2 3
24 XX 0 2 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 37 42 40
23 XX 1 1 2
22 XX 1 1 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 7 6 M.P.H.
21 XXX 2 1 3
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.42 0.20
19 0 0 0
18 X 0 1 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.61 0.65 0.45 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

EAST END AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/12/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:9:32AM 10:04AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MISSION BLVD AND SOUTH CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:EAST END AVE/SEVENTH ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 X 0 1 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 1 0 1
49 X 0 1 1
48 X 0 1 1
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 XX 0 2 2
41 X 0 1 1
40 XXXX 2 2 4 85TH %: 34 37 35 M.P.H.
39 XX 0 2 2
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 28 29 29 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8
36 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 15TH %: 22 21 22 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
34 XXXXXXXXX 7 2 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 27 - 36 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 6 16 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 P % IN PACE: 61% 47% 54%
31 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 A
30 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 C % OVER PACE: 8% 16% 15%
29 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 E
28 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 * % UNDER PACE: 31% 37% 32%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 *
26 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 29 29 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXX 2 4 6
24 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 33 68 51
23 XXXXXXX 5 2 7
22 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 8 7 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9
20 XXXXX 2 3 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.67 0.25
19 XXXX 2 2 4
18 XX 1 1 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.58 0.82 0.50 M.P.H. 17 XXXXX 2 3 5
16 X 0 1 1
15 XX 0 2 2
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

EAST END AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:03/09/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:12:20PM 12:43PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): NORTH CITY LIMIT AND MCKINLEY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:DRIVEWAY MID BLOCK FAIRGROUND SIDE OF THE STREET 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 XXXXX 4 1 5
49 XXXXX 2 3 5
48 X 1 0 1
47 XXXX 2 2 4
46 XXXXX 1 4 5
45 XXXX 2 2 4
44 XXXXX 3 2 5
43 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXX 1 9 10
41 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11
40 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 85TH %: 43 43 43 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 * 50TH %: 36 38 37 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 6 15 P
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 3 14 A 15TH %: 31 30 31 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 9 14 C
34 XXXXXXXXX 9 0 9 E 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 35 - 44 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXX 8 2 10 *
32 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 * % IN PACE: 70% 57% 59%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 4 13 *
30 XXXXXXXXX 1 8 9 % OVER PACE: 24% 12% 29%
29 XXXXX 0 5 5
28 XXXXX 2 3 5 % UNDER PACE: 6% 31% 12%
27 XXX 1 2 3
26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 33 35 33
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.35 0.17
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.57 0.59 0.41 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FAIRPLEX DRIVE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:03/09/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:54AM 12:15PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MCKINLEY AVE AND MCKINLEY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:MID BLOCK
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 XX 2 0 2
46 X 0 1 1
45 XXX 1 2 3
44 XX 1 1 2
43 XXX 2 1 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXX 2 2 4
41 0 0 0
40 XXXXX 0 5 5 85TH %: 38 38 38 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXX 4 2 6
38 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 50TH %: 32 33 32 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXX 2 4 6
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 * 15TH %: 27 28 28 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 29 - 38 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 P
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 14 21 A % IN PACE: 72% 70% 70% 31 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 C
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 5 18 E % OVER PACE: 18% 14% 21% 29 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 16% 10%
27 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 *
26 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
24 XXX 1 2 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 25 26
23 XX 1 1 2
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.25 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.50 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FAIRPLEX DRIVE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY

MCKINLEY AVE AND W MCKINLEY AVE
DATE:03/09/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:34AM 11:50AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MCKINLEY AVE AND MURCHINSON AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:FAIRPLEX DR/VIA ESTRELLA
63 0 0 0
62 X 0 1 1
61 X 0 1 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 0 1 1
59 XX 0 2 2 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 X 0 1 1
57 XX 0 2 2 ROAD SURFACE:
56 XX 2 0 2
55 XXXX 1 3 4 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 XXXX 1 3 4 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 XXXXXX 3 3 6
51 XX 1 1 2
50 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11 *
49 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 *
48 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
47 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 9 14 P
46 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 8 18 A
45 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 11 19 C
44 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 7 18 E
43 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
41 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 *
40 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 85TH %: 48 52 50 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXX 5 2 7
38 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 50TH %: 44 46 45 M.P.H.
37 XX 2 0 2
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 38 41 39 M.P.H.
35 XXXXX 4 1 5
34 X 0 1 1 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 41 - 50 41 - 50 M.P.H. 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 71% 70% 67%
31 XXX 3 0 3
30 XX 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 18% 19% 14%
29 X 1 0 1
28 0 0 0 % UNDER PACE: 11% 11% 20%
27 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 43 47 45 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 36 37
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.36 0.18
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.56 0.60 0.43 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FAIRPLEX DRIVE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY

W MCKINLEY AVE AND MURCHINSON AVE
DATE:03/09/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:10:55AM 11:19AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MURCHINSON AVE AND HOLT AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:FAIRPLEX DR/ARROYO DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 XX 2 0 2
51 X 0 1 1
50 XX 2 0 2
49 XXX 3 0 3
48 XXXX 3 1 4
47 XX 1 1 2
46 0 0 0
45 XXXXXXX 5 2 7
44 XXXXXX 3 3 6
43 XXXXXX 4 2 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 *
41 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 3 14 *
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 13 19 * 85TH %: 45 42 43 M.P.H. 39 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 10 21 A 50TH %: 38 37 38 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 C
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 E 15TH %: 34 33 33 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 10 18 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 *
32 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 % IN PACE: 71% 75% 73%
31 XXX 1 2 3
30 XX 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 23% 11% 17%
29 XX 1 1 2
28 XXX 1 2 3 % UNDER PACE: 6% 14% 10%
27 0 0 0
26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 37 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 23 26
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.23 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.48 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FAIRPLEX DRIVE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:03/07/23 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD:9:55AM 11:38AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WALNUT AVE AND RIVERSIDE DR 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:2840 FICUS ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 0 1 1
43 X 0 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 XX 1 1 2 85TH %: 31 34 33 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 XXXX 1 3 4 50TH %: 27 29 28 M.P.H.
37 XX 0 2 2
36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 23 24 23 M.P.H.
35 XXXXX 2 3 5
34 XXXXXXXXX 1 8 9 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 25 - 34 23 - 32 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10
32 XXXXXXXXXX 2 8 10 * % IN PACE: 82% 70% 72%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 9 19 * % OVER PACE: 12% 13% 18% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 9 14 P
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 A % UNDER PACE: 6% 17% 10%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 C
26 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 E ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 29 28 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 14 8 22 *
24 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 26 23
23 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 6 16 *
22 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H. 21 XXX 3 0 3
20 XXXXX 2 3 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.26 0.11
19 XX 1 1 2
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.41 0.51 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FICUS STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/17/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 9:41AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND TOWNE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:SAN LORENZO ST/FIRST ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 1 0 1
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 X 1 0 1 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 1 0 1
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 XX 1 1 2
51 XX 1 1 2
50 XX 1 1 2
49 XXXX 2 2 4
48 XX 1 1 2
47 XXXX 2 2 4
46 XX 1 1 2
45 XXX 2 1 3
44 X 1 0 1
43 XX 1 1 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 *
41 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 *
40 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * 85TH %: 44 41 42 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 P
38 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 A 50TH %: 36 35 36 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 C
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 E 15TH %: 29 28 28 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 30 - 39 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
32 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 % IN PACE: 56% 56% 54%
31 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
30 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 % OVER PACE: 17% 21% 14%
29 XXXXXX 2 4 6
28 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 % UNDER PACE: 27% 23% 32%
27 XXXXXXX 1 6 7
26 XX 0 2 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 35 36 M.P.H.
25 XXXX 2 2 4
24 XX 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 66 45 56
23 XX 1 1 2
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 8 7 8 M.P.H.
21 XXX 2 1 3
20 XX 2 0 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.66 0.45 0.28
19 0 0 0
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.81 0.67 0.53 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FIRST STREET
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/17/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:9:49AM 11:29AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): TOWNE AVE AND PARK AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:EAST OF GAREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25/40MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X 0 1 1
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 31 33 33 M.P.H.
39 XX 1 1 2
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 27 30 28 M.P.H.
37 XX 0 2 2
36 XX 1 1 2 15TH %: 22 25 23 M.P.H.
35 XXXX 1 3 4
34 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 26 - 35 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 9 14
32 XXXXXX 4 2 6 % IN PACE: 76% 78% 74%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 11 19 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 16 23 * % OVER PACE: 15% 7% 21% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 15 11 26 P % UNDER PACE: 9% 15% 6% 27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 A
26 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 C ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 29 28 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXX 8 2 10 E
24 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 19 20
23 XXXXXXXXXXX 9 2 11 *
22 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 XXXX 4 0 4
20 XXX 3 0 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.19 0.10
19 XX 0 2 2
18 X 0 1 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.43 0.32 M.P.H. 17 XX 2 0 2
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FIRST STREET
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/17/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:11:35AM 1:26PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PARK AVE AND OAK AVE 65 X 0 1 1
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:966 FIRST ST
63 X 0 1 1
62 0 0 0
61 X 1 0 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 X 0 1 1 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 X 1 0 1
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 XX 1 1 2
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 XX 1 1 2
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 XXX 1 2 3
49 X 0 1 1
48 XX 0 2 2
47 XXXXXX 2 4 6
46 XXXXXXX 1 6 7
45 XXXX 3 1 4
44 XXXXXX 2 4 6
43 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10
41 XXX 2 1 3
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 * 85TH %: 43 46 45 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXX 2 7 9 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 4 13 * 50TH %: 36 38 37 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 P
36 XXXXXXXXXXX 8 3 11 A 15TH %: 29 32 31 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 C
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 E 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 34 - 43 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 * % IN PACE: 58% 54% 56%
31 XXXX 3 1 4 *
30 XXX 0 3 3 % OVER PACE: 23% 25% 31%
29 XXXXX 5 0 5
28 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 % UNDER PACE: 19% 21% 14%
27 XX 1 1 2
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 39 38 M.P.H.
25 XX 2 0 2
24 XXX 1 2 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 60 59 61
23 0 0 0
22 XX 1 1 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 8 8 8 M.P.H.
21 XX 2 0 2
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.60 0.59 0.31
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.77 0.77 0.55 M.P.H. 17 X 1 0 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FIRST STREET
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/13/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:10:10AM 11:37AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND RESERVOIR ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:MID BLOCK FRANKLIN AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 XX 0 2 2
45 0 0 0
44 XX 0 2 2
43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 XX 1 1 2
40 XXX 2 1 3 85TH %: 34 37 35 M.P.H.
39 XX 2 0 2
38 XXXXXX 3 3 6 50TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXX 1 6 7
36 XXX 2 1 3 15TH %: 22 22 22 M.P.H.
35 XXXXX 1 4 5
34 XXXXXX 5 1 6 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 *
32 XXXXX 3 2 5 * % IN PACE: 66% 55% 60%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 9 19 *
30 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 P % OVER PACE: 13% 23% 21%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 6 15 A
28 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 C % UNDER PACE: 21% 22% 20%
27 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 E
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 29 29 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 *
24 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 50 42
23 XXXXXX 2 4 6
22 XXXXXXX 1 6 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 7 6 M.P.H.
21 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10
20 XXX 2 1 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.34 0.50 0.21
19 XXXXXX 4 2 6
18 XX 1 1 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.58 0.71 0.46 M.P.H. 17 XXX 1 2 3
16 0 0 0
15 XX 1 1 2
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FRANKLIN AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/13/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:40AM 12:58PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RESERVOIR ST AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:BURMA CT/FRANKLIN AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 1 0 1
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 0 1 1
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 0 0 0
40 XXX 1 2 3 85TH %: 35 35 35 M.P.H.
39 XXXX 1 3 4
38 XXX 1 2 3 50TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.
37 XXXX 3 1 4
36 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 15TH %: 22 24 24 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 2 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 24 - 33 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXX 2 8 10 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 * % IN PACE: 65% 69% 66%
31 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 P
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 A % OVER PACE: 16% 19% 17%
29 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 C
28 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 E % UNDER PACE: 19% 12% 18%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 11 19 *
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 29 29 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 9 16 *
24 XXXXXX 2 4 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 30 31
23 XXXXX 2 3 5
22 XXXXX 4 1 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
20 XXXXXX 5 1 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.34 0.30 0.16
19 XX 1 1 2
18 XXXX 2 2 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.58 0.54 0.40 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FRANKLIN AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/13/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:1:04PM 2:52PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GAREY AVE AND WHITE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:219 FRANKLIN AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30/35MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 XX 2 0 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X 1 0 1
40 XX 1 1 2 85TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXX 1 5 6
38 XXX 3 0 3 50TH %: 30 31 30 M.P.H.
37 XX 1 1 2
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 * 15TH %: 25 24 24 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 10 14 P
32 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 A % IN PACE: 68% 66% 67%
31 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 C
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 11 20 E % OVER PACE: 9% 10% 10% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 6 17 *
28 XXXXX 3 2 5 * % UNDER PACE: 23% 24% 24%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 *
26 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXX 6 0 6
24 XXXXX 0 5 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 36 34
23 XXXXXX 4 2 6
22 XXXXXX 2 4 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 XX 1 1 2
20 XXXXX 1 4 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.36 0.17
19 XXXXX 4 1 5
18 XXX 2 1 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.56 0.60 0.41 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 X 0 1 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FRANKLIN AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/27/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:1:25PM 3:08PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BONITA AVE AND ARROW HWY 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:2179 FULTON RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 XXXXXX 3 3 6
40 XXX 2 1 3 85TH %: 35 37 36 M.P.H.
39 XXX 0 3 3
38 XXX 2 1 3 50TH %: 29 30 29 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXX 1 6 7
36 XXXXXX 3 3 6 15TH %: 22 23 22 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8
34 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 23 - 32 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 *
32 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * % IN PACE: 59% 57% 57%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 P
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 10 18 A % OVER PACE: 16% 31% 20% 29 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 C
28 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 E % UNDER PACE: 25% 12% 24%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 *
26 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 29 29 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 *
24 XXXXX 2 3 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 40 36 38
23 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13
22 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
20 XXXX 1 3 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.35 0.19
19 XX 2 0 2
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.63 0.60 0.44 M.P.H. 17 X 0 1 1
16 XX 2 0 2
15 XXXX 3 1 4
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

FULTON ROAD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/19/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:9:35AM 9:53AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): NORTH CITY LIMIT AND BONITA AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:MID-BLOCK
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 1 0 1
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 XXX 2 1 3
49 0 0 0
48 XX 2 0 2
47 XXXXX 2 3 5
46 XX 2 0 2
45 XXXX 2 2 4
44 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 *
43 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 * NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 *
41 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 P
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 11 17 A 85TH %: 44 43 44 M.P.H. 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 10 17 C
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 7 17 E 50TH %: 38 38 38 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 * 15TH %: 32 31 32 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 *
34 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 31 - 40 35 - 44 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 % IN PACE: 62% 68% 64%
31 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11
30 XXXX 4 0 4 % OVER PACE: 11% 25% 9%
29 XXX 0 3 3
28 XX 1 1 2 % UNDER PACE: 27% 7% 28%
27 XX 2 0 2
26 XXX 0 3 3 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 37 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 26 30
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.34 0.26 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.58 0.51 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GAREY AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/19/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:9:58AM 10:18AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BONITA AVE AND LA VERNE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:2580 GAREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 X 1 0 1 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 XXXXX 2 3 5
48 X 0 1 1
47 XXXX 0 4 4
46 XXXX 0 4 4
45 XXX 0 3 3
44 XX 2 0 2
43 XXXXXX 4 2 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXX 2 7 9
41 XXXXXX 1 5 6
40 XXXX 1 3 4 85TH %: 38 43 42 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXX 1 11 12 * 50TH %: 33 37 35 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 9 13 P 15TH %: 30 33 31 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 19 8 27 A
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 C 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 33 - 42 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 15 4 19 E
32 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * % IN PACE: 75% 70% 69%
31 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXX 9 2 11 * % OVER PACE: 16% 17% 23%
29 XXX 2 1 3
28 XXX 2 1 3 % UNDER PACE: 9% 13% 9%
27 XX 2 0 2
26 XXXX 2 2 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 38 36 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 28 34
23 XX 2 0 2
22 X 1 0 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.28 0.17
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.57 0.53 0.41 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GAREY AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/19/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:10:22AM 10:41AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LA VERNE AVE AND WILLOW ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:GAREY AVE/FORD AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 XX 2 0 2
46 X 1 0 1
45 0 0 0
44 XXX 2 1 3
43 XXXXX 3 2 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9
41 XXXXX 2 3 5
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 8 18 * 85TH %: 40 40 40 M.P.H. 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 * 50TH %: 36 35 36 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 10 18 P
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 7 17 A 15TH %: 31 31 31 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 C
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 9 13 E 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 * % IN PACE: 74% 77% 76%
31 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 % OVER PACE: 15% 10% 13%
29 XX 1 1 2
28 XXXXXX 3 3 6 % UNDER PACE: 11% 13% 12%
27 0 0 0
26 XX 1 1 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 35 36 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 17 19
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.17 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.46 0.41 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GAREY AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/19/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:10:44AM 11:07AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WILLOW ST AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1725 GAREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 XXXX 3 1 4
43 XXXX 2 2 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 0
41 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
40 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 85TH %: 39 39 39 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 15 22 * 50TH %: 34 36 35 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 10 19 P
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 A 15TH %: 30 31 30 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 C
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 E 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 32 - 41 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 6 16 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 * % IN PACE: 76% 81% 77%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 *
30 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 % OVER PACE: 17% 3% 8%
29 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10
28 XXX 2 1 3 % UNDER PACE: 7% 16% 16%
27 XXXX 3 1 4
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 35 35 M.P.H.
25 XX 1 1 2
24 XX 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 18 19
23 XX 0 2 2
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.18 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.42 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GAREY AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/19/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:14AM 11:29AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ORANGE GROVE AVE AND HOLT AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:933 GAREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40/35MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 X 0 1 1
48 XX 1 1 2
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 XXXX 3 1 4
44 X 1 0 1
43 XXXXX 1 4 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXX 1 2 3
41 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10
40 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * 85TH %: 40 41 40 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 * 50TH %: 34 36 35 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 P
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 12 16 A 15TH %: 30 31 30 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 C
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 9 18 E 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 * % IN PACE: 70% 72% 71%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 *
30 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 % OVER PACE: 10% 21% 14%
29 XXXXXX 4 2 6
28 XXXXXX 5 1 6 % UNDER PACE: 20% 7% 16%
27 XXX 1 2 3
26 XX 2 0 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 36 35 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23 27 25
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.23 0.27 0.13
19 X 0 1 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.52 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GAREY AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/19/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:33AM 11:50AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HOLT AVE AND MISSION BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:399 GAREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 XX 1 1 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XX 1 1 2
41 X 1 0 1
40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 27 28 28 M.P.H.
37 X 1 0 1
36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 23 22 23 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0
34 XXXXXXXXXX 8 2 10 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 24 - 33 23 - 32 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
32 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 * % IN PACE: 71% 73% 72%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 10 20 * % OVER PACE: 15% 8% 14% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 P
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 A % UNDER PACE: 14% 19% 15%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 12 18 C
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 8 19 E ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 28 28 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 *
24 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 25 24
23 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
22 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXX 1 5 6
20 XXXXX 2 3 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.25 0.12
19 XXX 2 1 3
18 XXX 2 1 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.49 0.50 0.35 M.P.H. 17 XX 0 2 2
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GAREY AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/19/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:54AM 12:09PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MISSION BLVD AND FRANKLIN AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:805 GAREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 0 0 0
44 XXX 1 2 3
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 XXX 1 2 3
41 XX 0 2 2
40 XXXX 3 1 4 85TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9
38 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 50TH %: 31 33 33 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 * 15TH %: 24 27 25 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 11 20 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 3 10 13 P 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 30 - 39 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 A
32 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 C % IN PACE: 62% 69% 64%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 E
30 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * % OVER PACE: 9% 8% 15%
29 XXXXXXXXX 8 1 9 *
28 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * % UNDER PACE: 29% 23% 21%
27 XXXXXXX 2 5 7
26 XXX 0 3 3 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 33 32 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXXX 6 1 7
24 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 33 29 31
23 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8
22 XX 2 0 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 XX 1 1 2
20 XX 1 1 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.29 0.15
19 XX 1 1 2
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.57 0.53 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GAREY AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/14/23 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD:2:31PM 2:42PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): FRANKLIN AVE AND COUNTY RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:2260 GAREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 XX 0 2 2
48 XXXX 3 1 4
47 XX 1 1 2
46 XX 1 1 2
45 XXXXXX 2 4 6
44 XXXXX 3 2 5
43 XXXXXX 3 3 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8
41 XXXXXX 1 5 6 *
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 9 18 * 85TH %: 41 42 42 M.P.H. 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 12 22 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 9 20 P 50TH %: 37 38 38 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 10 17 A
36 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 C 15TH %: 31 32 32 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXX 9 3 12 E
34 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 33 - 42 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 *
32 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * % IN PACE: 71% 69% 68%
31 XXXX 3 1 4
30 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 % OVER PACE: 16% 15% 18%
29 XXX 2 1 3
28 XXX 1 2 3 % UNDER PACE: 13% 16% 14%
27 XXXX 3 1 4
26 XX 1 1 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 38 37 M.P.H.
25 XX 0 2 2
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 30 27
23 0 0 0
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.30 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.50 0.54 0.37 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GAREY AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/14/23 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD:2:49PM 3:09PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): COUNTY RD AND SOUTH CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:CAL TRANS FACILITY YARD DRIVEWAY 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 0 1 1
50 X 1 0 1
49 X 0 1 1
48 XXX 2 1 3
47 XXX 1 2 3
46 X 0 1 1
45 XXX 1 2 3
44 XXXX 1 3 4
43 XXXXXX 2 4 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
41 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 *
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 6 19 * 85TH %: 41 43 42 M.P.H. 39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 14 7 21 P
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 15 23 A 50TH %: 38 38 38 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 8 18 C
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 10 17 E 15TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 *
32 XXXXX 2 3 5 % IN PACE: 79% 75% 77%
31 XXXXX 4 1 5
30 XXXX 2 2 4 % OVER PACE: 9% 16% 13%
29 XXX 2 1 3
28 XXX 2 1 3 % UNDER PACE: 12% 9% 11%
27 X 0 1 1
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 38 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 23 22
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.23 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.46 0.48 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GAREY AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/12/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:10:09AM 11:30AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND RESERVOIR ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1568 GRAND AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XX 2 0 2
41 XX 1 1 2
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 36 34 35 M.P.H.
39 XXXXX 3 2 5
38 XXX 2 1 3 50TH %: 31 30 30 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXX 5 2 7
36 XXXXX 4 1 5 15TH %: 24 24 24 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXX 8 3 11 *
34 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 11 18 P % IN PACE: 62% 72% 67%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 10 21 A
30 XXXXXXXXXXXX 3 9 12 C % OVER PACE: 17% 9% 13%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 E
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 10 16 * % UNDER PACE: 21% 19% 20% 27 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 *
26 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 29 30 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXX 3 3 6
24 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 29 30
23 XXX 1 2 3
22 XXXXXX 4 2 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 XXX 1 2 3
20 XXXXX 3 2 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.29 0.15
19 XXX 2 1 3
18 XXX 1 2 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.57 0.54 0.39 M.P.H. 17 XX 1 1 2
16 XX 0 2 2
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GRAND AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/12/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:34AM 12:29PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RESERVOIR ST AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1083 GRAND AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 XX 1 1 2
46 X 0 1 1
45 XX 0 2 2
44 0 0 0
43 XXX 2 1 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XX 0 2 2
41 XX 1 1 2
40 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 85TH %: 38 39 38 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXX 3 3 6
38 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 50TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11 *
36 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * 15TH %: 26 28 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 P 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 A
32 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 C % IN PACE: 67% 73% 67%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 8 18 E
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 13 21 * % OVER PACE: 25% 17% 17% 29 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 * % UNDER PACE: 8% 10% 17%
27 XXXXXXX 5 2 7
26 XXXXXXXXXXX 10 1 11 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 33 32 M.P.H. 25 XXX 2 1 3
24 XXXXX 4 1 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 33 30
23 X 0 1 1
22 X 1 0 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.33 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 XX 0 2 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.57 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 X 0 1 1
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GRAND AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/12/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:12:35PM 1:26PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GAREY AVE AND HANSEN AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:174 GRAND AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 XX 1 1 2
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X 1 0 1
40 XXX 1 2 3 85TH %: 36 35 35 M.P.H.
39 XXXXX 2 3 5
38 XXXXXX 3 3 6 50TH %: 30 29 30 M.P.H.
37 XX 1 1 2
36 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 15TH %: 25 25 25 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 *
34 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 24 - 33 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 P % IN PACE: 68% 73% 69%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 A
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 C % OVER PACE: 11% 21% 15%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 13 20 E
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 9 14 * % UNDER PACE: 21% 6% 17%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 *
26 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 30 30 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12
24 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27 24 26
23 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8
22 XXX 1 2 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 XX 1 1 2
20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.27 0.24 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.52 0.49 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GRAND AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/20/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:24AM 1:24PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): TOWNE AVE AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:190 GROVE ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 28 27 28 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 23 22 23 M.P.H.
37 X 0 1 1
36 X 1 0 1 15TH %: 19 19 19 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0
34 X 0 1 1 10 MPH PACE: 19 - 28 19 - 28 19 - 28 M.P.H. 33 X 1 0 1
32 X 1 0 1 % IN PACE: 78% 82% 80%
31 X 1 0 1
30 XX 1 1 2 % OVER PACE: 13% 8% 10%
29 XXXX 2 2 4
28 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 10% 9%
27 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
26 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 24 23 23 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 P
24 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 A SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 16 18
23 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 C
22 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 E STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 *
20 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.36 0.27 0.15 19 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
18 XXX 1 2 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.60 0.52 0.39 M.P.H. 17 XXX 1 2 3
16 XXXXX 3 2 5
15 0 0 0
55 61 116
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GROVE STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/20/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:20AM 11:20AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GAREY AVE AND WEST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:238 GROVE ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 1 0 1
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 XX 0 2 2
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 26 27 26 M.P.H.
37 XXX 2 1 3
36 XXXXX 3 2 5 15TH %: 21 20 20 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0
34 XXXX 2 2 4 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 22 - 31 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 X 0 1 1
32 XXXX 4 0 4 % IN PACE: 61% 56% 59%
31 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
30 XXXXXX 2 4 6 * % OVER PACE: 23% 21% 22%
29 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
28 XXXX 2 2 4 P % UNDER PACE: 16% 23% 19%
27 XXXXXX 5 1 6 A
26 XXXXXX 5 1 6 C ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 27 27 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXX 4 2 6 E
24 XXXXX 3 2 5 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 41 44 42
23 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 *
22 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 7 6 M.P.H.
21 XXXX 2 2 4
20 XXXXX 2 3 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.74 1.03 0.43
19 X 1 0 1
18 XXXXX 2 3 5 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.86 1.01 0.65 M.P.H. 17 X 1 0 1
16 XXX 1 2 3
15 0 0 0
56 43 99
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

GROVE STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/21/23 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 9:33AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ORANGE GROVE AVE AND MISSION BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:881 HAMILTON BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 1 0 1
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 X 0 1 1
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 1 0 1
46 XXX 2 1 3
45 XXX 1 2 3
44 XXXXX 3 2 5
43 XXXXX 2 3 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9
41 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11
40 XXXXXXXXXXXX 9 3 12 * 85TH %: 41 42 41 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 10 18 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 * 50TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 P
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 A 15TH %: 31 30 31 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 C
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 E 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 7 17 *
32 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 * % IN PACE: 74% 62% 68%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 9 16 *
30 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 % OVER PACE: 18% 22% 20%
29 XX 1 1 2
28 XXXXX 1 4 5 % UNDER PACE: 8% 16% 12%
27 XXX 0 3 3
26 XXXX 1 3 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 36 36 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23 34 29
23 X 0 1 1
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.23 0.34 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.58 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

HAMILTON BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/21/23 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD:9:38AM 10:33AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MISSION BLVD AND PHILLIPS BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:710 HAMILTON BLVD
63 X 0 1 1
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X 0 1 1
47 X 0 1 1
46 0 0 0
45 X 0 1 1
44 XX 0 2 2
43 XXX 1 2 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXX 0 4 4
41 XXXXXXXX 1 7 8
40 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 85TH %: 37 41 40 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXX 2 8 10 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 50TH %: 32 36 34 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 P 15TH %: 27 31 29 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 6 15 A
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 6 15 C 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 32 - 41 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 E
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 * % IN PACE: 74% 69% 69%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 5 18 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 * % OVER PACE: 8% 12% 16%
29 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
28 XXX 2 1 3 % UNDER PACE: 18% 19% 16%
27 XXXXXX 4 2 6
26 XXXX 3 1 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 36 34 M.P.H.
25 XXX 3 0 3
24 XXXXXX 5 1 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 32 29
23 X 1 0 1
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 6 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.32 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.44 0.56 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

HAMILTON BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/21/23 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD:10:46AM 12:37PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PHILLIPS BLVD AND LEXINGTON AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1712 HAMILTON BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 0 1 1
43 XX 1 1 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XX 2 0 2
41 XXX 1 2 3
40 XX 2 0 2 85TH %: 37 36 36 M.P.H.
39 XX 1 1 2
38 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 50TH %: 31 31 31 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8
36 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * 15TH %: 27 25 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 *
34 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 9 18 P
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 10 16 A % IN PACE: 75% 68% 72%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 6 15 C
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 8 21 E % OVER PACE: 10% 13% 15% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 4 15 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 19% 14%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 *
26 XXXX 4 0 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 31 31 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9
24 XXX 0 3 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 31 27
23 XXXXX 1 4 5
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.
21 XX 0 2 2
20 XXX 1 2 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.31 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.49 0.55 0.37 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 X 0 1 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

HAMILTON BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/20/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:1:28PM 2:22PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): TOWNE AVE AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:STERLING ST/HARRISON AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 XX 0 2 2
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 0 0 0
40 XX 1 1 2 85TH %: 35 34 35 M.P.H.
39 XXXX 2 2 4
38 XXX 3 0 3 50TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
37 XXXX 1 3 4
36 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 15TH %: 24 25 25 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 25 - 34 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 9 14 P % IN PACE: 68% 73% 69%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 A
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 10 19 C % OVER PACE: 29% 15% 13% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 E
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 11 15 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 12% 18%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 9 16 *
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 7 17 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 30 30 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
24 XXXXXXXXXXX 8 3 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 25 24
23 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8
22 XXXXX 1 4 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.25 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 X 0 1 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.49 0.50 0.35 M.P.H. 17 XX 1 1 2
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

HARRISON AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
DATE:03/09/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:46AM 10:01AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MILLS AVE AND SAN ANTONIO AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1485 HOLT AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 XXX 2 1 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XX 1 1 2
41 XXX 1 2 3
40 XXX 2 1 3 85TH %: 38 37 38 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXX 4 2 6
38 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 50TH %: 32 31 32 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXX 3 3 6
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 * 15TH %: 27 27 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 3 15 P
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 7 20 A % IN PACE: 70% 70% 70% 31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 C
30 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 E % OVER PACE: 20% 17% 19%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3 11 14 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 13% 12%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 *
26 XXXXXX 3 3 6 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 32 32 M.P.H.
25 XXX 0 3 3
24 XXX 1 2 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 24 25
23 XXXXXXX 6 1 7
22 XX 0 2 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.24 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.50 0.49 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

HOLT AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:03/09/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:10:07AM 10:22AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SAN ANTONIO AVE AND HAMILTON BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:567 HOLT AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 X 1 0 1
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 0 0 0
44 XXX 1 2 3
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XX 1 1 2
41 XXX 1 2 3
40 XXXXXX 2 4 6 85TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
39 XXX 3 0 3
38 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 50TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
36 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * 15TH %: 27 28 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 P 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 9 18 A
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 8 18 C % IN PACE: 71% 76% 71%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 E
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 17 26 * % OVER PACE: 20% 13% 14% 29 XXXXXXXXX 2 7 9 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 11% 16%
27 XXXXXXX 6 1 7
26 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 32 32 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9
24 XXX 1 2 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 22 24
23 XXXXX 5 0 5
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.22 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.47 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

HOLT AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:03/09/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:10:29AM 10:46AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HAMILTON BLVD AND FAIRPLEX DR 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:915 HOLT AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 XXX 1 2 3
47 X 0 1 1
46 XX 2 0 2
45 XXX 1 2 3
44 XXXXX 2 3 5
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXXX 1 3 4
41 XXXX 1 3 4
40 XXXXX 3 2 5 85TH %: 39 41 39 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXX 7 1 8 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXX 8 3 11 * 50TH %: 33 34 34 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 9 14 P 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 A
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 6 15 C 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 29 - 38 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 9 21 E
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 * % IN PACE: 72% 70% 70%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 * % OVER PACE: 11% 19% 15%
29 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
28 XXXX 2 2 4 % UNDER PACE: 17% 11% 16%
27 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8
26 XXXXXX 4 2 6 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 35 34 M.P.H.
25 XXXX 4 0 4
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 31 29
23 X 1 0 1
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.31 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.56 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

HOLT AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/10/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:12:18PM 12:49PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): VALLEY BLVD AND MISSION BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:295 HUMANE WAY
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 1 0 1
59 X 0 1 1 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 XX 0 2 2
49 XX 0 2 2
48 XXX 0 3 3
47 XX 1 1 2
46 XXXX 3 1 4
45 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11
44 XXXX 0 4 4
43 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 *
41 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
40 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 85TH %: 42 45 44 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 P
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 11 18 A 50TH %: 37 39 38 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 6 16 C
36 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 E 15TH %: 31 32 32 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 *
34 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 36 - 45 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 *
32 XXXXXX 4 2 6 % IN PACE: 68% 62% 63%
31 XXXXX 2 3 5
30 XXXXX 3 2 5 % OVER PACE: 12% 12% 20%
29 XXXXX 2 3 5
28 XXXXX 3 2 5 % UNDER PACE: 20% 26% 18%
27 XXXX 3 1 4
26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 39 38 M.P.H.
25 XXX 2 1 3
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 40 37
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.40 0.19
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.57 0.63 0.43 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

HUMANE WAY
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:03/09/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:29AM 9:42AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): AMERICAN AVE AND HOLT AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1575 INDIAN HILL BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 0 1 1
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 0 1 1
50 X 0 1 1
49 XXXX 1 3 4
48 XXX 2 1 3
47 X 1 0 1
46 XX 1 1 2
45 XXXXXXX 1 6 7
44 XXXXX 4 1 5
43 XXXXXXX 6 1 7 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8
41 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 *
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3 11 14 * 85TH %: 43 44 43 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 P 50TH %: 37 38 37 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 5 17 A
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 7 20 C 15TH %: 33 32 32 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 E
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 33 - 42 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 *
32 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 * % IN PACE: 72% 67% 69%
31 XXXX 1 3 4
30 XXX 0 3 3 % OVER PACE: 10% 17% 21%
29 XXXX 0 4 4
28 XX 2 0 2 % UNDER PACE: 18% 16% 11%
27 XX 2 0 2
26 XXXX 3 1 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 38 38 M.P.H.
25 XX 0 2 2
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 36 30
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.24 0.36 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.49 0.60 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

INDIAN HILL BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/26/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:09AM 12:08PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND SAN ANTONIO AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:890 KINGSLEY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 THIS STREET SEGMENT HAS SPEED BUMPS.
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 26 26 26 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 22 22 22 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 18 17 18 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0
34 X 0 1 1 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 18 - 27 18 - 27 M.P.H. 33 0 0 0
32 0 0 0 % IN PACE: 83% 80% 82%
31 0 0 0
30 XXX 2 1 3 % OVER PACE: 6% 3% 5%
29 0 0 0
28 XXXXX 4 1 5 % UNDER PACE: 11% 17% 14%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 9 16 *
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 22 22 22 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 9 21 *
24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 P SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 15 14
23 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 A
22 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 9 21 C STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 E
20 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 10 17 * VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.13 0.14 0.07 19 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
18 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 * STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.36 0.38 0.26 M.P.H. 17 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15
16 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10
15 XXX 0 3 3
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

KINGSLEY AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/24/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:9:39AM 10:25AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MOUNTAIN AVE AND TOWNE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:853 LA VERNE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 XX 1 1 2
49 X 0 1 1
48 0 0 0
47 XXXX 2 2 4
46 XX 0 2 2
45 XXX 0 3 3
44 XXX 0 3 3
43 XX 1 1 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXXXX 3 2 5
41 XXXX 1 3 4
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 * 85TH %: 40 41 40 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 * 50TH %: 35 36 36 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 7 17 P
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 A 15TH %: 30 31 31 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 C
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 6 17 E 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 * % IN PACE: 77% 68% 73%
31 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 % OVER PACE: 8% 18% 13%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12
28 XXX 2 1 3 % UNDER PACE: 15% 14% 15%
27 XX 1 1 2
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 36 36 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 27 23
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.27 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.52 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

LA VERNE AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/24/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 9:34AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): TOWNE AVE AND ARROW HWY 65 X 1 0 1
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:316 LA VERNE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40/35MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 1 0 1
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 X 1 0 1
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 XXX 3 0 3
51 0 0 0
50 XX 2 0 2
49 XXXX 3 1 4
48 XXX 2 1 3
47 XXXX 2 2 4
46 XXXXXX 5 1 6
45 XXXXXX 3 3 6
44 XXXXXXXXXXX 9 2 11 *
43 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXX 6 1 7 *
41 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 P
40 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 A 85TH %: 47 43 45 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 C
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3 12 15 E 50TH %: 40 38 38 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 11 19 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 14 24 * 15TH %: 35 33 34 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 *
34 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 35 - 44 35 - 44 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXX 1 6 7
32 XXXX 3 1 4 % IN PACE: 62% 75% 69%
31 XXXX 0 4 4
30 XX 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 25% 8% 17%
29 XX 2 0 2
28 XX 1 1 2 % UNDER PACE: 13% 17% 15%
27 0 0 0
26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 41 38 40 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 44 19 34
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 4 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.19 0.17
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.66 0.43 0.41 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

LA VERNE AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:03/13/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:12:37PM 2:14PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND RESERVOIR ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1206 LEXINGTON AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 27 28 28 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 23 24 23 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X 0 1 1 15TH %: 18 19 19 M.P.H.
35 X 1 0 1
34 XXX 0 3 3 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 19 - 28 19 - 28 M.P.H. 33 X 0 1 1
32 XX 0 2 2 % IN PACE: 79% 76% 76%
31 XX 1 1 2
30 XXX 0 3 3 % OVER PACE: 14% 14% 12%
29 XXXXXX 3 3 6
28 XXXXXXXXXXXX 3 9 12 * % UNDER PACE: 7% 10% 12%
27 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 *
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3 11 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 24 24 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 P
24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 10 16 A SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 20 19 23 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 C
22 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 E STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 *
20 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 11 16 * VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.20 0.12 19 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 *
18 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.53 0.45 0.35 M.P.H. 17 XXXX 2 2 4
16 XXXXX 2 3 5
15 0 0 0
57 100 157
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

LEXINGTON AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:03/13/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:12:37PM 2:14PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RESERVOIR ST AND TOWNE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:872 LEXINGTON AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 X 0 1 1
44 X 0 1 1
43 XXXXX 4 1 5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XX 1 1 2
41 XX 2 0 2
40 XXX 0 3 3 85TH %: 36 37 37 M.P.H.
39 XXXX 1 3 4
38 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 50TH %: 30 33 31 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXX 2 7 9
36 XXXXXX 3 3 6 15TH %: 26 28 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 12 19 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 28 - 37 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 P % IN PACE: 74% 74% 72%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 A
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 C % OVER PACE: 21% 15% 21%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 10 22 E
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 * % UNDER PACE: 5% 11% 8%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 *
26 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 33 32 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXX 6 0 6
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 24 26
23 0 0 0
22 XXX 2 1 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 XXXX 1 3 4
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.24 0.13
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.49 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

LEXINGTON AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:03/13/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:11:37AM 12:35PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): TOWNE AVE AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:POMONA CEMETERY DRIVEWAY
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 XXX 0 3 3
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 XX 0 2 2
45 X 0 1 1
44 XX 1 1 2
43 XXXX 3 1 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXXX 2 2 4
41 XXXXXX 1 5 6
40 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 85TH %: 38 41 39 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 * 50TH %: 33 36 34 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 P 15TH %: 28 29 29 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 A
34 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 C 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 32 - 41 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 E
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 8 19 * % IN PACE: 72% 66% 65% 31 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 *
30 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9 * % OVER PACE: 16% 11% 15%
29 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11
28 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 % UNDER PACE: 12% 23% 20%
27 XXX 1 2 3
26 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 35 34 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 XXXXXX 4 2 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 33 31
23 X 1 0 1
22 XX 1 1 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.33 0.16
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.58 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

LEXINGTON AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:03/13/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:10:32AM 11:33AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GAREY AVE AND HAMILTON BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:835 LEXINGTON AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XX 0 2 2
41 XX 0 2 2
40 XXXX 1 3 4 85TH %: 34 37 35 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 XXXXX 0 5 5 50TH %: 29 32 30 M.P.H.
37 XXXX 1 3 4
36 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 15TH %: 26 27 26 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXX 2 9 11 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 27 - 36 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 10 19 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 P % IN PACE: 83% 75% 77%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 A
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 11 23 C % OVER PACE: 8% 16% 13% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 11 20 E
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 9% 10%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 8 19 *
26 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 32 31 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 16 20 19
23 XXXXXX 5 1 6
22 XX 2 0 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.20 0.10
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.40 0.45 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

LEXINGTON AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/26/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:2:08PM 2:51PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND SAN ANTONIO AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:853 LINCOLN AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 XXX 2 1 3
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXXX 1 3 4
41 XX 0 2 2
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 34 36 34 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 XXX 1 2 3 50TH %: 29 30 30 M.P.H.
37 XXX 0 3 3
36 XXX 1 2 3 15TH %: 25 25 25 M.P.H.
35 XXXX 2 2 4
34 XXXXXXXXXXX 8 3 11 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 * % IN PACE: 81% 76% 77%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 9 19 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 10 19 P % OVER PACE: 8% 21% 19% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 11 22 A
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 C % UNDER PACE: 11% 3% 5%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXX 9 3 12 E
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 31 30 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 *
24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 9 14 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 28 24
23 XXXXXX 4 2 6
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.20 0.28 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.45 0.53 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

LINCOLN AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/26/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:3:19PM 4:43PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): TOWNE AVE AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:411 MCKINLEY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 32 33 33 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 XXXX 3 1 4 50TH %: 27 28 27 M.P.H.
37 XXX 1 2 3
36 XXXX 2 2 4 15TH %: 23 24 24 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9
34 XXXXXX 2 4 6 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 23 - 32 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXX 1 5 6
32 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 % IN PACE: 77% 78% 77%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 * % OVER PACE: 18% 19% 20%
29 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 12 19 P % UNDER PACE: 5% 3% 3% 27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 10 19 A
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 C ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 28 28 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 10 23 E
24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 16 19 23 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 *
22 XXXXXXXXX 7 2 9 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H. 21 XXX 3 0 3
20 XX 1 1 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.16 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.46 0.40 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MCKINLEY AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/27/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 9:56AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ORANGE GROVE AVE AND WHITE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:315 MCKINLEY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 XX 1 1 2 85TH %: 34 35 34 M.P.H.
39 XXX 1 2 3
38 XXXXX 1 4 5 50TH %: 28 30 29 M.P.H.
37 XX 1 1 2
36 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 15TH %: 24 26 25 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 26 - 35 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXX 3 9 12 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 11 15 * % IN PACE: 73% 74% 72%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 P
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 14 6 20 A % OVER PACE: 16% 12% 14% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 C
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 E % UNDER PACE: 11% 14% 15% 27 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 *
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 7 18 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 30 29 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
24 XXXXXXXXXXX 8 3 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 19 21
23 XXXX 2 2 4
22 XXXX 0 4 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 XXXXX 4 1 5
20 XXXX 4 0 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.19 0.10
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.45 0.44 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MCKINLEY AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/27/23 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD:10:01AM 10:45AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WHITE AVE AND FAIRPLEX DR 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PAIGE DR/MCKINLEY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 XX 0 2 2
48 X 1 0 1
47 XX 2 0 2
46 XX 2 0 2
45 XX 1 1 2
44 XXX 1 2 3
43 XXXX 3 1 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXXXXX 4 2 6
41 XXXXX 3 2 5
40 XXXXXXX 6 1 7 85TH %: 42 38 41 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 10 19 * 50TH %: 37 34 35 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 9 20 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXX 3 9 12 P 15TH %: 27 28 28 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 A
34 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 C 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 29 - 38 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 9 13 E
32 XXXXXXX 1 6 7 * % IN PACE: 59% 70% 59%
31 XXXXXX 1 5 6 *
30 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9 * % OVER PACE: 13% 14% 19%
29 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8
28 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 % UNDER PACE: 28% 16% 22%
27 XXXXXX 2 4 6
26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 34 35 M.P.H.
25 XXXX 2 2 4
24 XXXX 3 1 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 53 35 44
23 XX 2 0 2
22 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 6 7 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 XX 0 2 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.35 0.22
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.73 0.60 0.47 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MCKINLEY AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/10/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:10:28AM 10:45AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEEDTOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND SAN ANTONIO AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1114 MISSION BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 XX 0 2 2
48 XXXXXX 3 3 6
47 X 0 1 1
46 XX 2 0 2
45 X 1 0 1
44 XXX 0 3 3
43 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9
41 XXXXXXXXX 2 7 9
40 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 85TH %: 41 42 42 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 *
38 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 * 50TH %: 35 36 36 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 P 15TH %: 30 31 31 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 A
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 C 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 33 - 42 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 13 23 E
32 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * % IN PACE: 70% 64% 67%
31 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 * % OVER PACE: 20% 14% 25%
29 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
28 XXXXX 2 3 5 % UNDER PACE: 10% 22% 9%
27 XX 2 0 2
26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 37 36 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 XX 2 0 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27 30 28
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.27 0.30 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.52 0.55 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MISSION BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/10/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:10:48AM 11:07AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SAN ANTONIO AVE AND PARK AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:903 MISSION BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X 1 0 1
50 XXXX 2 2 4
49 0 0 0
48 XXX 3 0 3
47 0 0 0
46 XXX 1 2 3
45 X 1 0 1
44 X 0 1 1
43 XXXX 1 3 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XX 0 2 2
41 XXXXXX 3 3 6
40 XXXXX 4 1 5 85TH %: 40 39 40 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXX 9 3 12 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 * 50TH %: 35 35 35 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 P 15TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 9 13 A
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 12 25 C 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 29 - 38 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 4 14 E
32 XXXXXXXXXX 2 8 10 * % IN PACE: 73% 75% 74%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 * % OVER PACE: 17% 17% 16%
29 XXXXXX 2 4 6
28 XXXXXXX 4 3 7 % UNDER PACE: 10% 8% 11%
27 0 0 0
26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 35 35 M.P.H.
25 XXXXX 1 4 5
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 37 25 31
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.25 0.15
19 XX 2 0 2
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.61 0.50 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MISSION BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/10/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:11:11AM 11:27AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PARK AVE AND DUDLEY ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:685 MISSION BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35/40MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 XXX 1 2 3
44 XX 2 0 2
43 XXXXXX 5 1 6 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXX 5 1 6
41 XXXXXXXXX 8 1 9
40 XXXXX 3 2 5 85TH %: 41 38 40 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXX 2 7 9 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 * 50TH %: 36 35 35 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 12 20 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 11 24 P 15TH %: 30 29 30 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 11 17 A
34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 C 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 E
32 XXXXXXXXXXXX 8 4 12 * % IN PACE: 69% 74% 71%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 *
30 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * % OVER PACE: 26% 7% 16%
29 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8
28 XXX 2 1 3 % UNDER PACE: 5% 19% 14%
27 XXX 2 1 3
26 XXXX 0 4 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 34 35 M.P.H.
25 XXX 1 2 3
24 XXX 0 3 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 26 24
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 XX 0 2 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.26 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.46 0.51 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MISSION BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/10/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:11:37AM 11:51AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): DUDLEY ST AND HUMANE WAY 65 0 0 0
64 X 1 0 1 OBSERVATION POINT:1620 MISSION BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 X 1 0 1
61 X 0 1 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 XX 1 1 2 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 XXX 2 1 3
57 X 1 0 1 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 0 1 1
55 XXX 1 2 3 ROAD CONDITION:
54 XXXX 2 2 4
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 XXXX 1 3 4
51 XXX 1 2 3
50 XXX 2 1 3
49 XXXX 1 3 4
48 XXXXXXX 1 6 7
47 XXXXXX 1 5 6
46 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
45 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 *
44 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 4 14 *
43 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 P EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 A
41 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10 C
40 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 E 85TH %: 47 49 49 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
38 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 * 50TH %: 41 42 42 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
36 XXXXXX 2 4 6 15TH %: 32 33 33 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
34 XXXX 3 1 4 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 39 - 48 37 - 46 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXX 1 5 6
32 XXXX 2 2 4 % IN PACE: 59% 48% 52%
31 XXXXXX 3 3 6
30 XX 0 2 2 % OVER PACE: 16% 18% 23%
29 XX 1 1 2
28 XXX 1 2 3 % UNDER PACE: 25% 34% 26%
27 XXX 3 0 3
26 XXXX 2 2 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 41 42 41 M.P.H.
25 XX 1 1 2
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 70 69 69
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 8 8 8 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.70 0.69 0.34
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.83 0.83 0.59 M.P.H. 17 X 0 1 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MISSION BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/10/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:11:57AM 12:12PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HUMANE WAY AND TEMPLE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:OPEN AREA SOUTH OF PHILIPS
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:50 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 1 0 1
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 XX 2 0 2
57 XXXXX 3 2 5 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 1 0 1
55 XXXXX 2 3 5 ROAD CONDITION:
54 XXXXXX 1 5 6
53 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 XXXXXXX 4 3 7
51 XXXXX 3 2 5
50 XXXXXXXXX 8 1 9
49 XXXXXXX 5 2 7
48 XXXXXXX 6 1 7
47 XXXXXXX 5 2 7
46 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10
45 XXXXXX 5 1 6
44 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
43 XXXXXX 3 3 6 * EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 *
41 XXXXX 3 2 5 P
40 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 A 85TH %: 52 53 52 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 C
38 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 E 50TH %: 45 40 43 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * 15TH %: 37 33 36 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 *
34 XX 1 1 2 10 MPH PACE: 42 - 51 35 - 44 35 - 44 M.P.H. 33 XXXX 0 4 4
32 XXXXX 0 5 5 % IN PACE: 53% 50% 47%
31 XXXXX 2 3 5
30 X 0 1 1 % OVER PACE: 16% 32% 43%
29 X 0 1 1
28 XX 0 2 2 % UNDER PACE: 31% 18% 11%
27 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 45 41 43 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 43 64 56
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 8 8 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.43 0.64 0.28
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.66 0.80 0.53 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MISSION BOULEVARD
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/26/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:10:19AM 11:03AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RESERVOIR ST AND SAN ANTONIO AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:373 MONTEREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25/35MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 X 0 1 1
45 X 1 0 1
44 0 0 0
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X 0 1 1
40 XX 1 1 2 85TH %: 34 37 35 M.P.H.
39 XXX 2 1 3
38 XXXX 1 3 4 50TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXX 2 4 6
36 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 15TH %: 22 25 24 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 9 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 25 - 34 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 P % IN PACE: 64% 63% 63%
31 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 A
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 C % OVER PACE: 9% 26% 15%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 E
28 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 * % UNDER PACE: 27% 11% 22%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 *
26 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 31 30 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10
24 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 37 36
23 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
22 XXXX 3 1 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 XXXX 4 0 4
20 XXX 3 0 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.37 0.18
19 0 0 0
18 XXX 3 0 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.57 0.61 0.42 M.P.H. 17 XX 1 1 2
16 X 1 0 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MONTEREY AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/26/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:10:19AM 11:03AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SAN ANTONIO AVE AND PALOMARES ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:373 MONTEREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25/35MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 X 0 1 1
45 X 1 0 1
44 0 0 0
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X 0 1 1
40 XX 1 1 2 85TH %: 34 37 35 M.P.H.
39 XXX 2 1 3
38 XXXX 1 3 4 50TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXX 2 4 6
36 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 15TH %: 22 25 24 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 9 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 25 - 34 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 P % IN PACE: 64% 63% 63%
31 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 A
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 C % OVER PACE: 9% 26% 15%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 E
28 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 * % UNDER PACE: 27% 11% 22%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 *
26 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 31 30 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXX 4 6 10
24 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 37 36
23 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
22 XXXX 3 1 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 XXXX 4 0 4
20 XXX 3 0 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.37 0.18
19 0 0 0
18 XXX 3 0 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.57 0.61 0.42 M.P.H. 17 XX 1 1 2
16 X 1 0 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MONTEREY AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE:04/26/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 10:16AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PALOMARES ST AND HAMILTON BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:459 MONTEREY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35/30MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 XX 1 1 2 85TH %: 32 35 34 M.P.H.
39 XXXX 2 2 4
38 XX 1 1 2 50TH %: 28 30 29 M.P.H.
37 XXXX 2 2 4
36 XXXX 1 3 4 15TH %: 23 24 24 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXX 0 7 7
34 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXX 1 5 6 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 * % IN PACE: 76% 69% 71%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 7 15 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 9 18 P % OVER PACE: 11% 22% 16% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 4 15 A
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 C % UNDER PACE: 13% 9% 14%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 E
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 29 29 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 9 13 *
24 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 27 24
23 XXXXXX 5 1 6
22 XXXXXXXXXXX 8 3 11 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H. 21 XXXXX 3 2 5
20 XX 1 1 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.20 0.27 0.12
19 X 1 0 1
18 X 0 1 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.44 0.52 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 X 0 1 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MONTEREY AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE:04/11/23 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD:12:55PM 1:34PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): FAIRPLEX DR AND RIDGEWAY ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:AUGUSTA ST/MURCHINSON AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 XXX 3 0 3
47 XX 0 2 2
46 XX 1 1 2
45 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
44 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13
43 XXXXX 3 2 5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
41 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 *
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 3 15 * 85TH %: 43 43 43 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 9 13 P
38 XXXXXXXXXXX 8 3 11 A 50TH %: 38 37 37 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 11 22 C
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 E 15TH %: 34 32 33 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 5 16 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 11 17 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
32 XXXXX 1 4 5 % IN PACE: 77% 66% 72%
31 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8
30 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 % OVER PACE: 16% 17% 17%
29 0 0 0
28 XX 0 2 2 % UNDER PACE: 7% 17% 12%
27 X 0 1 1
26 0 0 0 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 37 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17 24 21
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.17 0.24 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.41 0.49 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

MURCHINSON AVENUE
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
DATE:04/18/23 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD:1:02PM 2:04PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): EAST CITY LIMIT AND RESERVOIR ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1295 NINTH ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 X 1 0 1 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 0 0 0
50 X 1 0 1
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 X 0 1 1
44 X 0 1 1
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXX 2 1 3
41 XXX 1 2 3
40 XXX 2 1 3 85TH %: 34 36 35 M.P.H.
39 XX 0 2 2
38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 27 27 27 M.P.H.
37 X 0 1 1
36 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 15TH %: 21 21 21 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXX 3 3 6
34 XXXXXXXX 1 7 8 10 MPH PACE: 19 - 28 22 - 31 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXX 4 2 6
32 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 % IN PACE: 61% 52% 56%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXX 3 9 12
30 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 % OVER PACE: 36% 30% 38%
29 XXXXX 2 3 5 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 18% 7%
27 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
26 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 P ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 28 28 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 A
24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 10 20 C SAMPLE VARIANCE: 50 54 52 23 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 E
22 XXXXXXX 2 5 7 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 7 7 M.P.H.
21 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 *
20 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 5 13 * VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.54 0.26 19 XXXX 3 1 4
18 XX 1 1 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.70 0.73 0.51 M.P.H. 17 XXXXX 0 5 5
16 XXX 2 1 3
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

NINTH STREET
CARLOS
CLOUDY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/18/23 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD:11:44AM 12:56PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RESERVOIR ST AND WHITE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:MID-BLOCK
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 1 0 1
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXXXXX 5 1 6
41 XXX 2 1 3
40 XXXXXX 3 3 6 85TH %: 38 37 38 M.P.H.
39 XX 1 1 2
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 * 50TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 *
36 XXXXXXXXXX 5 5 10 * 15TH %: 27 27 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 P
34 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 A 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXX 2 7 9 C
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 7 17 E % IN PACE: 66% 69% 66%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 * % OVER PACE: 19% 7% 10%
29 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXX 9 2 11 % UNDER PACE: 15% 24% 24%
27 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11
26 XXXXXX 2 4 6 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 32 32 M.P.H.
25 XXX 2 1 3
24 XXXX 2 2 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 32 25 28
23 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.
21 XX 1 1 2
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.25 0.14
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.56 0.50 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

NINTH STREET
CARLOS
CLOUDY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/18/23 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD:9:54AM 11:41AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WHITE AVE AND HANSEN AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:990 NINTH ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X 1 0 1
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 X 1 0 1
44 XXX 2 1 3
43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 XXX 2 1 3
40 XX 0 2 2 85TH %: 36 37 36 M.P.H.
39 XX 1 1 2
38 XXXXX 2 3 5 50TH %: 30 32 31 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3 11 14 * 15TH %: 24 26 25 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 *
34 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 28 - 37 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 10 14 P
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 12 18 A % IN PACE: 64% 70% 66%
31 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 C
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 E % OVER PACE: 26% 10% 15%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 4 13 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 20% 20%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXX 7 5 12 *
26 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 32 31 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXXX 3 4 7
24 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 38 30 34
23 X 0 1 1
22 XXXX 3 1 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 XXX 3 0 3
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.30 0.17
19 XX 1 1 2
18 XX 2 0 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.61 0.54 0.41 M.P.H. 17 X 0 1 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

NINTH STREET
CARLOS
CLOUDY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:03/08/23 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD:2:11PM 4:11PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ROUTE 71 AND VILLAGE LOOP RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:NORTH RANCH RD/SAGE CANYON RD 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X 0 1 1
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 XX 2 0 2
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 35 34 35 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 33 29 31 M.P.H.
37 XXX 2 1 3
36 XXXXX 3 2 5 * 15TH %: 29 25 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXX 5 0 5 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 4 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 25 - 34 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 P
32 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 A % IN PACE: 88% 78% 80%
31 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 C
30 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 E % OVER PACE: 11% 9% 8%
29 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 *
28 XXXXXXX 1 6 7 * % UNDER PACE: 2% 13% 12%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 *
26 XXXX 0 4 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 29 31 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 XXXX 1 3 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 23 20
23 XX 0 2 2
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.42 0.18
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.47 0.65 0.43 M.P.H. 17 X 0 1 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
57 55 112

CITY OF POMONA
TO

NORTH RANCH ROAD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/14/23 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD:12:20PM 2:20PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ROUTE 71 AND VILLAGE LOOP RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:MID-BLOCK
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 1 0 1
46 X 1 0 1
45 XXXX 1 3 4
44 X 0 1 1
43 XXXXXXX 3 4 7 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 XXXX 2 2 4
41 XXX 0 3 3
40 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 * 85TH %: 40 42 41 M.P.H.
39 XXX 3 0 3 *
38 XXXX 1 3 4 * 50TH %: 33 35 34 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXX 2 4 6 P
36 XX 2 0 2 A 15TH %: 27 26 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 C
34 XXX 1 2 3 E 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 32 - 41 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 3 15 *
32 XXXX 0 4 4 * % IN PACE: 59% 53% 55%
31 XXXXXXXX 6 2 8 *
30 XXX 2 1 3 % OVER PACE: 12% 16% 16%
29 XXXXXXX 6 1 7
28 XXXXX 0 5 5 % UNDER PACE: 29% 31% 28%
27 XXX 2 1 3
26 XX 1 1 2 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
25 XXX 3 0 3
24 XXX 2 1 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 39 53 46
23 0 0 0
22 XXX 1 2 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 7 7 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 XXX 2 1 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.60 0.86 0.36
19 XXX 0 3 3
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.77 0.92 0.60 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
66 62 128
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

OLD POMONA ROAD
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:03/07/23 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD:2:50PM 3:46PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RESERVOIR ST AND GAREY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:KOOLISH ST/OLIVE ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X 1 0 1
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X 0 1 1
44 0 0 0
43 XX 0 2 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXX 2 1 3
41 XX 0 2 2
40 XXXX 1 3 4 85TH %: 35 37 36 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 XXXXX 3 2 5 50TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXX 1 7 8
36 XXXXXX 2 4 6 15TH %: 25 25 25 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 25 - 34 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 6 16 *
32 XXXXXXXXXX 8 2 10 P % IN PACE: 72% 60% 66%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 A
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 9 22 C % OVER PACE: 12% 27% 17% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 E
28 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * % UNDER PACE: 16% 13% 18%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 *
26 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 31 31 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXXXXX 3 6 9
24 XXXXXXX 7 0 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28 38 33
23 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H.
21 XXXX 1 3 4
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.38 0.16
19 X 0 1 1
18 XXX 0 3 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.53 0.62 0.40 M.P.H. 17 XX 0 2 2
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

OLIVE STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/24/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:11:54AM 12:36PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ARROW HWY AND LA VERNE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:ORANGE GROVE AVE/MEADOW LANE 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 X 1 0 1
47 X 1 0 1
46 X 0 1 1
45 XXX 2 1 3
44 X 1 0 1
43 XXX 2 1 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 XXX 2 1 3
41 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 *
40 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 * 85TH %: 41 39 40 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXX 3 8 11 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 P 50TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 12 24 A
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 10 18 C 15TH %: 31 32 32 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 10 21 E
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 11 19 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 6 13 *
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 * % IN PACE: 74% 83% 79%
31 XXXXXXXXX 6 3 9
30 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 % OVER PACE: 10% 5% 8%
29 XXXX 2 2 4
28 XX 2 0 2 % UNDER PACE: 16% 12% 14%
27 XX 1 1 2
26 X 1 0 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 16 19
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.16 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.46 0.40 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

ORANGE GROVE AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/24/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:12:40PM 1:27PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LA VERNE AVE AND MCKINLEY AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:ORANGE GROVE AVE/SAN JUAN ST 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X 0 1 1
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 XXXX 3 1 4
43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 X 0 1 1
40 XXXX 2 2 4 85TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8
38 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 * 50TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 4 13 * 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 7 18 P
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 13 21 A 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 9 19 C
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 11 18 E % IN PACE: 76% 78% 77%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 7 13 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 5 14 * % OVER PACE: 15% 9% 10%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 *
28 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 % UNDER PACE: 9% 13% 14%
27 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10
26 XXXX 2 2 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
25 XXXXX 1 4 5
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 19 18
23 0 0 0
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.19 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.44 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF POMONA
TO

ORANGE GROVE AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
DATE:04/24/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:1:32PM 1:53PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MCKINLEY AVE AND WHITE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:165 ORANGE GROVE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 0 0 0
45 XX 1 1 2
44 X 1 0 1
43 XXX 3 0 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXX 2 1 3
41 XXX 1 2 3
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 38 37 37 M.P.H.
39 XXXX 3 1 4
38 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 50TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 * 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 10 19 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 P 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 29 - 38 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 11 17 A
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 11 24 C % IN PACE: 79% 80% 80% 31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 E
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 8 16 * % OVER PACE: 16% 8% 14%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 *
28 XXXXXXXXXX 7 3 10 * % UNDER PACE: 5% 12% 7%
27 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10
26 XXXX 2 2 4 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 18 18 18
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.18 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.43 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

ORANGE GROVE AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/24/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:1:57PM 2:15PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WHITE AVE AND LEWIS ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:CASA VISTA DR/ORANGE GROVE AVE 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 1 0 1
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 XX 1 1 2
46 0 0 0
45 X 1 0 1
44 X 0 1 1
43 XX 0 2 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XX 0 2 2
41 X 0 1 1
40 XXXX 1 3 4 85TH %: 37 39 38 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12
38 XXXXXX 1 5 6 50TH %: 31 33 32 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 *
36 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 * 15TH %: 27 30 29 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 8 13 *
34 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 P 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 30 - 39 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 A
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 15 16 31 C % IN PACE: 74% 76% 75% 31 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 5 15 E
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 7 19 * % OVER PACE: 9% 10% 16% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 8 14 *
28 XXXXXXXXX 5 4 9 * % UNDER PACE: 17% 14% 10%
27 XXXXXXXXX 7 2 9
26 XXXXX 5 0 5 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 34 33 M.P.H.
25 XXXX 4 0 4
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 18 21
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.18 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.47 0.42 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

ORANGE GROVE AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUDY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/24/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:2:18PM 2:49PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LEWIS ST AND FAIRPLEX DR 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1152 ORANGE GROVE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 XX 0 2 2
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 XX 2 0 2
45 XXX 2 1 3
44 XXX 1 2 3
43 XXXX 2 2 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11
41 XXXXXX 3 3 6
40 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 * 85TH %: 40 42 41 M.P.H.
39 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 10 17 *
38 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 7 17 * 50TH %: 36 37 36 M.P.H. 37 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 15 9 24 P
36 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 5 16 A 15TH %: 33 31 32 M.P.H. 35 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 10 23 C
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 3 15 E 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 6 14 *
32 XXXXXXXXXX 2 8 10 * % IN PACE: 85% 69% 76%
31 XXXXXXXX 3 5 8 *
30 XXXX 1 3 4 % OVER PACE: 7% 19% 17%
29 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8
28 XX 0 2 2 % UNDER PACE: 8% 12% 8%
27 0 0 0
26 X 0 1 1 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 36 37 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 12 25 19
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.12 0.25 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.35 0.50 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

ORANGE GROVE AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUDY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/21/23 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD:3:09PM 3:53PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MCKINLEY AVE AND HOLT AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:690 PALOMARES ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 0 0 0
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 32 33 33 M.P.H.
39 XX 1 1 2
38 XXXXX 3 2 5 50TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H.
37 XXX 1 2 3
36 XX 1 1 2 15TH %: 22 22 22 M.P.H.
35 XXXXX 1 4 5
34 XXXXXXX 5 2 7 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 20 - 29 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXX 2 4 6
32 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 % IN PACE: 69% 64% 65%
31 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 2 13 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 3 15 * % OVER PACE: 20% 31% 23%
29 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 P % UNDER PACE: 11% 5% 13%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 5 17 A
26 XXXXXXXXXXXX 6 6 12 C ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 28 28 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3 11 14 E
24 XXXXXXXXXXXX 4 8 12 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 37 31
23 XXXXXX 2 4 6 *
22 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 * STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9
20 XXXXXX 2 4 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.37 0.16
19 XXXXX 3 2 5
18 XX 2 0 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.50 0.61 0.39 M.P.H. 17 XX 0 2 2
16 X 0 1 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

PALOMARES STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/21/23 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD:2:30PM 3:04PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): HOLT AVE AND MISSION BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PALOMARES ST/FOURTH ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 26 28 27 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 23 24 23 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 18 20 19 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0
34 0 0 0 10 MPH PACE: 18 - 27 20 - 29 18 - 27 M.P.H. 33 X 0 1 1
32 XX 0 2 2 % IN PACE: 83% 78% 81%
31 XXX 2 1 3
30 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8 % OVER PACE: 9% 10% 15%
29 XXXXX 0 5 5
28 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 % UNDER PACE: 8% 12% 5%
27 XXXXXXXXXXXX 5 7 12 *
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 23 24 23 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 9 19 *
24 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 9 16 P SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 14 14
23 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 13 11 24 A
22 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 9 16 C STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 12 5 17 E
20 XXXXXXXXXXXXX 4 9 13 * VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.13 0.14 0.07 19 XXXXXXXXXXX 7 4 11 *
18 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 * STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.37 0.38 0.27 M.P.H. 17 XXXXX 4 1 5
16 XXX 3 0 3
15 X 1 0 1
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

PALOMARES STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/21/23 DAY: Friday TIME PERIOD:12:45PM 2:24PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MISSION BLVD AND FRANKLIN AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1591 PALOMARES ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X 1 0 1
44 XX 1 1 2
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 XX 2 0 2
40 XX 1 1 2 85TH %: 35 34 34 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 XX 1 1 2 50TH %: 28 29 28 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXXX 5 2 7
36 XXXX 3 1 4 15TH %: 22 23 22 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXX 2 6 8
34 XXXXXXXXXXX 6 5 11 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 26 - 35 23 - 32 M.P.H. 33 XXXXX 0 5 5
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 8 15 * % IN PACE: 58% 66% 61%
31 XXXXXXXXX 4 5 9 *
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 7 16 * % OVER PACE: 23% 7% 23%
29 XXXXXXXXXXXX 3 9 12 P
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 8 17 A % UNDER PACE: 19% 27% 16% 27 XXXXXXXX 4 4 8 C
26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 9 17 E ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 29 29 M.P.H. 25 XXXXXXXXXX 6 4 10 *
24 XXXXXXXXXX 3 7 10 * SAMPLE VARIANCE: 41 26 33
23 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8 *
22 XXXXXXXXXXX 5 6 11 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H. 21 XXXXXX 3 3 6
20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.26 0.17
19 XXXXXXXX 5 3 8
18 XXX 3 0 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.64 0.51 0.41 M.P.H. 17 XX 2 0 2
16 X 1 0 1
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF POMONA
TO

PALOMARES STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
FAIR
RADAR
DRY
DATE:04/24/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD:2:58PM 3:52PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): GAREY AVE AND ORANGE GROVE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:1671 PARK AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 X 0 1 1
40 XX 1 1 2 85TH %: 35 34 35 M.P.H.
39 XXXX 3 1 4
38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 29 31 30 M.P.H.
37 XXXXXX 2 4 6
36 XXXXXXXX 7 1 8 * 15TH %: 25 27 27 M.P.H.
35 XXXXXXXXXXX 4 7 11 *
34 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6 9 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 26 - 35 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5 10 15 P
32 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8 12 20 A % IN PACE: 70% 88% 78% 31 XXXXXXXXXXXX 2 10 12 C
30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 10 14 24 E % OVER PACE: 19% 8% 8% 29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7 7 14 *
28 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11 7 18 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 4% 15% 27 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 9 10 19 *
26 XXXXXX 4 2 6 ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 31 31 M.P.H.
25 XXXXXXXXXX 8 2 10
24 XXXXXX 5 1 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 12 17
23 XX 2 0 2
22 XXX 2 1 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 3 4 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.12 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.47 0.34 0.29 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

← All documents from this meeting