505 S. Garey Ave
City of Pomona Pomona, CA 91764
•
Regular Meeting Minutes
City Council / Housing Authority / Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency
layor Tim Sandova
ice Mayor Nora Garci
ouncilmember John Nott
ouncilmember Victor Preciad
VISION STATEMENT
Pomona will be recognized as a vibrant, safe, beautiful community that is a fun and exciting destination and the home of arts and artists, students and scholars, business and industry.
Monday, August 5, 2024 7:00 PM Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER
)) Mayor Sandoval called the City Council Closed Session to order at 5:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Tim Sandoval
Councilmember John Nolte
Councilmember Victor Preciado
Councilmember Elizabeth Ontiveros-Cole
Councilmember Steve Lustro
Absent: Vice Mayor Nora Garcia
Councilmember Elizabeth Ontiveros-Cole
Councilmember Robert Torres
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Live Comments were as follows:
There were no live comments for closed session agenda items.
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
CLOSED SESSION
A) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(a) and (d) (1))
City of Pomona, et al. v. M & A Gabaee, et al.
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Case No. 22PSCV03011
Lucy Cho, et al. v. City of Pomona, et al.
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Case No. 20PSCV00410
New National Opioid Settlement Notice - Kroeger Co.
Ref. Num. CL-789572
B) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957)
Title: Neighborhood Services Director
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Sandoval called the City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Carvalho stated the City Council appointed a new Neighborhood Services Department Director. City Manager Gutierrez stated the new Department Director for Neighborhood Services is Beverly Johnson, who has been Acting Director for the past seven months.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Nolte led the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Tim Sandoval
Vice Mayor Nora Garcia
Councilmember John Nolte
Councilmember Victor Preciado
Councilmember Elizabeth Ontiveros-Cole
Councilmember Steve Lustro
Councilmember Robert Torres
City of Pomona Page 2
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 uccessor Agency to th
edevelooment Agenc
Absent: None
STAFF PRESENT
Anita Gutierrez, City Manager
Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Rosalia Butler, City Clerk
Diana Robles, Deputy City Clerk
Michael Ellis, Police Chief
Yvonne Morgan, contracted by the City, provided translation services.
MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER COMMUNICATIONS
Vice Mayor Garcia discussed attending a Chino City Council meeting, and requested support from City Council to engage with Chino to discuss and develop a good neighbor policy.
Councilmember Preciado attended the Powers Park Community meeting and discussed some of the efforts and improvements made to street safety. Councilmember Preciado wished all students a good start to the new school year.
Councilmember Ontiveros-Cole noted repairs on San Francisco St have started, and discussed the importance of staying hydrated during hot summer days.
Councilmember Torres gave thanks to the people in attendance that were planning to speak on some of the agenda items.
Mayor Sandoval commented on the City's priority to maintain safe and accessible sidewalks, and stated a sub-committee of the City Council directed staff to draft an ordinance for safe sidewalks. Lastly, the Mayor advised the sub-committee would continue to work with both sidewalk vendors and brick and mortar businesses to ensure a safe community.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Gutierrez stated there was nothing additional to report.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
At the direction of the City Council Emergency Sub Committee, beginning with the July 18, 2022 Council meeting, emailed comments will no longer be read into the record during Council meetings. However, they will be included as part of the record/meeting minutes.
Live Comments were as follows:
City of Pomona Page 3
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
Yesenia Miranda Meza spoke in support of establishing stronger housing protections for tenants.
Graciela R. Conchas discussed concerns of rental rate gouging practices at the Tavoli Apartments and spoke in support of stronger housing protections for tenants.
Geraldine Furllow discussed the challenges she faces as a tenant at the Tavoli Apartments.
Manny Barrera requested tenant protections and discussed concerns over rental rate gouging practices at the Tavoli Apartments.
Dominga Rayo discussed challenges she and her family face as a tenant and requested stronger tenant protections.
Eunice Rollins discussed concerns over rental rate gouging practices at the Tavoli Apartments.
Ivan Hernandez discussed the Pomona's Kids First Initiative and its purpose.
Jerry Christian discussed safety concerns for tenants at Sienna Residence Apartments.
Minerva Hernandez discussed a vending agreement offer from the swap meet to the sidewalk vendors.
Brandon Mejia advised he had approval from the Pomona school district, and the swap meet to allow sidewalk vendors in one safe location.
Edgar Sanchez spoke in support of sidewalk vendors.
Efren Navarro spoke in support of sidewalk vendors and discussed concerns with sex trafficking activity and homelessness in the City.
Maria Pompa spoke in support of stronger housing protections for tenants.
Carlos Flores discuss the decrease in proper service at Tavoli Apartments after management changed, and discussed safety concerns in the area.
Carol Anten discussed concerns over speed and traffic safety in her neighborhood.
Greg Estel discussed the need to increase Pomona Police staff.
City of Pomona Page 4
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
The following people submitted speaker cards in support of stronger tenant protections but did not wish to speak:
Gady Esquire Alberta Altamirano Eva Romero
Margarita Casteñeda Maria Jaime Rocha Jesus Sanchez
Linda Harris Johnny Saldana Anel Hernandez
Rigoberto Romero Juanita Mesa Evelia Rocha
Soraida Osuna Maria Delgado
Enrique Altamirano Tina Velasco
Mayor Sandoval called a recess at 8:01 p.m. after Public Comment ended.
Mayor Sandoval resumed the meeting at 8:06 p.m.
CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PRECIADO, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to approve the entire Consent Calendar except for Items No. 3 and No. 9, pulled for public comment, and Item No. 11 pulled by Vice Mayor Garcia for questions.
1. Approval of City Council/Housing Authority/Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Meeting Minutes
It is recommended that the City Council approve the following City Council/Housing Authority/Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Meeting Minutes:
July 1, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes
July 15, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PRECIADO, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to approve the City Council/Housing Authority/Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Regular Meeting Minutes of July 1, 2024 and July 15, 2024.
Adoption of a Resolution Receiving a Grant Award of $6,300 from Tri-City Mental Health Services and Amending the FY 2024-25 Operating Budget by Increasing Revenue Estimates and Appropriating the $6,300 in Awarded Grant Funds It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1) Adopt the following resolution:
City of Pomona Page 5
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-99 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA RECEIVING A GRANT AWARD OF $6,300 FROM TRI-CITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AND AMENDING THE FY 2024-25 OPERATING BUDGET BY INCREASING REVENUE ESTIMATES AND APPROPRIATING THE $6,300 IN AWARDED GRANT FUNDS
2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents related with this action, with approval of the City Attorney as to form.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PRECIADO, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-99 and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents related with this action, with approval of the City Attorney as to form.
3. Adopt a Special Events Policy and Procedures
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-106 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A SPECIAL EVENTS POLICY AND
PROCEDURES
*This item was pulled for public comment.
support or against the item.
Councilmember Preciado asked questions to staff and requested a re-wording of a section of the policy to permit operations such as the Second Saturday Artwalk, the 909 Market and others
Community Services Manager Mike Osoff answered his questions and commented on the intent of the new policy.
THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED, NO ACTION WAS TAKEN.
Approval of Summary Vacation VU1-2024 of a Portion of the City's Unused Storm Drain Easement Located within the Boundary of the Residential Lots Located 1002 Corinthian Way and 1003 Gothic Way, Pomona, CA, Assessor Parcel Numbers 8358-021-005 and -004; Approval of the Quitclaim Deed for the Vacated Easement (Council District 1)
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
City of Pomona Page 6
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
1) Adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-111 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARY
VACATION VU1-2024 OF A PORTION OF THE CITY'S UNUSED STORM
DRAIN EASEMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED AT 1002 CORINTHIAN WAY AND 1003 GOTHIC WAY, POMONA, CA, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 8358-021-005 AND -004 AND
APPROVING QUITCLAIM DEED FOR THE VACATED EASEMENT
2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the quitclaim deed on behalf of the City.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PRECIADO, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-111 and authorize the City Manager to execute the quitclaim deed on behalf of the City.
5. Approve a Memorandum of Understanding and License Agreement between the City of Pomona and Just Us 4 Youth for the Use of Renacimiento Community Center It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1) Approve the Memorandum of Use (MOU) and License Agreement with Just Us 4 Youth; and
2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a one-year agreement with a one-year renewal option and any future amendments on behalf of the City.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PRECIADO, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to approve the Memorandum of Use (MOU) and License Agreement with Just Us 4 Youth; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a one-year agreement with a one-year renewal option and any future amendments on behalf of the City.
6. A Resolution to Amend the FY 2024-25 CIP Budget; and Award of Construction Contract to California Professional Engineering, Inc. in the Amount of $377,225 for "Streetlights - Citywide (CDBG) (FY 22-23 to FY 24-25)," Project No. 428-2590-XXXXX-64777
It is recommended that the City Council approve the following actions:
1) Adopt the following resolution:
City of Pomona Page 7
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-101 - A RESOLUTION CORRECTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE FY 2024-25 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET BY
UNAPPROPRIATING $73,000 OF GENERAL FUNDS FROM "ADA CURB RAMPS AND PATH OF TRAVEL - CITYWIDE (CDBG) (FY 21-22)," PROJECT NO. 428-2590-XXXXX-67934 AND $17,775 OF MEASURE R FUNDS FROM "STREET PRESERVATION - LOCAL (FY 21-22)," PROJECT NO.
428-2590-XXXXX-68572, AND APPROPRIATING THOSE FUNDS TO
"STREETLIGHTS - CITYWIDE (CDBG) (FY 22-23 TO FY 24-25), PROJECT NO. 428-2590-XXXXX-64777
2) Find that the Project referenced above is categorically exempt from the California 3) Find that the apparent low bidder, Metrocell Construction, Inc., is not responsive bidder;
4) Award a construction contract to California Professional Engineering, Inc. for "Streetlights - Citywide (CDBG) (FY 22-23 to (FY 24-25)," Project No. 428-2590-XXXXX-64777, to include all Base Bid items in the amount of $377,225; and
5) Authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute the construction contract/agreement and related documents (permits, etc.).
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PRECIADO, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-101; and find that the Project referenced above is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (c) and that the proposed project will not have significant effect on the environment; and find that the apparent low bidder, Metrocell Construction, Inc., is not responsive bidder; and award a construction contract to California Professional Engineering, Inc. for "Streetlights - Citywide (CDBG) (FY 22-23 to (FY 24-25)," Project No. 428-2590-XXXXX-64777, to include all Base Bid items in the amount of $377,225; and authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute the construction contract/agreement and related documents (permits, etc.).
Resolution to Amend the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating Budget by Appropriating $6,000 from the Refuse Administration Fund Balance to Allow for the Completion of the Solid Waste Franchise Fee Study and Approve Extension to Agreement with R3 to Finalize the Study
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
City of Pomona Page 8
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
1) Adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-118 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 OPERATING BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $6,000 FROM THE
REFUSE ADMINISTRATION FUND BALANCE TO ALLOW FOR THE
COMPLETION OF THE SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE FEE STUDY
2) Approve an extension to the agreement with R3 Consulting Group, Inc. through December 31, 2024 to finalize tasks related to the solid waste fee study; and 3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the amendment subject to review by the City Attorney.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PRECIADO, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-118; and approve an extension to the agreement with R3 Consulting Group, Inc. through December 31, 2024 to finalize tasks related to the solid waste fee study; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the amendment subject to review by the City Attorney.
8. Approve the Purchase of Storage and Networking Hardware from the Redesign Group in an amount not to exceed $337,000
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1) Approve the purchase of Dell PowerStore 500T Storage Server and Networking Hardware for City Hall from the Redesign Group for a total estimated amount of $227,000 utilizing NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 23026 / Participating Addendum No. 7-23-70-55-01; and
2) Approve the purchase of Dell PowerStore 500T Storage Server and Networking Hardware for the Police Department from the Redesign Group for a total estimated amount of $110,000 utilizing NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 23026 / Participating Addendum No. 7-23-70-55-01.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PRECIADO, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to approve the purchase of Dell PowerStore 500T Storage Server and Networking Hardware for City Hall from the Redesign Group for a total estimated amount of $227,000 utilizing NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 23026 | Participating Addendum No. 7-23-70-55-01; and approve the purchase of Dell PowerStore 500T Storage Server and Networking Hardware for the Police Department from the Redesign Group for a total estimated amount of $110,000 utilizing NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 23026 / Participating Addendum No. 7-23-70-55-01
City of Pomona Page 9
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
Appeal of Planning Commission Decision to Approve a Housing Development Project to develop a 1.9 acre site with 45 residential units, consisting of eight structures, each three stories in height, as well as associated on-site and off-site improvements at 1707 N. Towne Avenue. (Case File: DPR-021499-2023, TRACTMAP-021501-2023)
It is recommended that the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission.
*Please see attachment for emails submitted regarding this item. *This item was pulled for public comment.
Applicant Mathew Livingston spoke in support of the decision of the Planning Commission and opposed the holding of a public hearing.
Public Speaker Guillermo Gonzalez spoke in support of a public hearing and expressed concern for possible traffic hazards that would be created by the project.
Public Speaker Deborah Clifford spoke in support of a public hearing and expressed concern for a lack of parking worsening after the project is built.
Public Speaker Anten Carol opposed the project and expressed support for a public hearing.
Public Speaker M. Joyce Bakersmith expressed support for a public hearing.
Public Speaker Ann Tomkins expressed support for sending the item back to the Planning Commission for further review.
Public Speaker Mike Suarez expressed concern for potential increases in traffic hazards and for the lack of parking availability because of the proposed development.
Public Speaker Hank Fung opposed the public hearing and expressed support for approval of the project.
Vice Mayor Garcia asked questions about the appeal process and the options City Council had.
Councilmember Ontiveros-Cole stated she appealed this project and expressed support for having a public hearing at a later City Council meeting.
Councilmember Lustro expressed support for the scheduling of a public hearing.
City of Pomona Page 10
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
Councilmember Torres also expressed support for the scheduling of a public hearing and asked questions about the appeal process.
Councilmember Nolte asked brief questions.
MOTION BY MAYOR SANDOVAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER ONTIVEROS- COLE, CARRIED 7-0, to hold a public hearing at a future City Council meeting.
10. Resolution Increasing , Revenue Estimates and Appropriations for the California Violence Intervention & Prevention (CalVIP) Grant
It is recommended that the City Council take the following action adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-120 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING FY 2024-25 CITY OPERATING
BUDGET BY INCREASING REVENUE ESTIMATES AND APPROPRIATIONS FOR
THE CALVIP FUND
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PRECIADO, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-120.
11. Resolution Approving the Submittal of Delinquent Solid Waste (Trash) Collection Accounts To the County Auditor-Controller to be Included as a Special Assessment on the FY 2024-25 Property Tax Roll
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1) Adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-107 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE
DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE (TRASH) COLLECTION ACCOUNTS FROM
ATHENS SERVICES AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT
THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES
2) Approve the lien list of delinquent Solid Waste (Trash) collection accounts be submitted to the Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller no later than August 1, 2024, to be included as a special assessment for the respective affected parcel on the County property tax rolls.
*Vice Mayor Garcia pulled this item for questions.
City of Pomona Page 11
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
Vice Mayor Garcia asked questions about the City's past processes for addressing delinquent solid waste accounts.
City Manager Gutierrez answered Vice Mayor Garcia's questions and advised this collection option had been written in the contract with Athens.
Athens Government Affairs Director Iso Nakasato added further clarification about the steps Athens takes when an account becomes delinquent before Athens collects through property taxes.
MOTION BY MAYOR SANDOVAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER LUSTRO, CARRIED 6-1 (VICE MAYOR GARCIA OPPOSED), to adopt Resolution No. 2024-107; and approve the lien list of delinquent Solid Waste (Trash) collection accounts be submitted to the Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller no later than August 1, 2024, to be included as a special assessment for the respective affected parcel on the County property tax rolls.
DISCUSSION CALENDAR
11. Finding of Public Benefit to the Community at Large-Recommended Expenditure(s) and Recap of Expended Funds
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1) Approve the expenditure(s) recommended and make the finding that the community at large will receive a public benefit from the expenditure of funds for the recommended items); and
A) Amount to be determined to Assistance National Council of Negro Women Pomona Valley Section in support of Bethune Height Recognition: Requested Amount: $1,000
B) Amount to be determined to Kennedy Austin Foundation in support of Group Box of Hope: Requested Amount: $1,000
C) Amount to be determined to Downtown Pomona Owners Association in support of 2024 Annual Pomona Christmas Parade - Requested Amount $15,000
D) Amount to be determined to Project Resilience in support of Community Pull- Up with Pomona Unified - Requested Amount $15,000
E) Amount to be determined to Winter on Wisconsin in support of Winter on Wisconsin joining Christmas on Columbia- Requested Amount $1,000 City of Pomona Page 12
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
F) Amount to be determined to ACCE Institute C/O Pomona United for Stable Housing PUSH in support of Know Your Rights Tenant Workshops - Requested Amount $1,500
G) Amount to be determined to Chestnut on Chester in support of Chestnut on Chester joining Christmas on Columbia- Requested Amount $1,500 Amies Carnival- Requested Amoun 32, Pomona in support of 4th Annual 1) Amount to be determined to Girl Scout Troop 70534 in support of Supplies and Activities/ Program Pillars - Requested Amount $500 2) Receive and file the recap of final amounts.
MOTION BY MAYOR SANDOVAL, SECOND BY VICE MAYOR GARCIA, CARRIED 7-0, to make a finding of public benefit for items A-l.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
12. Public Hearing for an appeal of Planning Commission's approval of a Housing Development Project (DPR 72-2024) to develop 289 dwelling units It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1) Conduct a Public Hearing regarding the appeal received for the Housing Development Project; and,
2) After receiving public comment and testimony, close the Public Hearing and adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-121 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW (DPR 72-2024) TO DEVELOP A 5.5 ACRE SITE WITH 289
DWELLING UNITS WITHIN TWO, FOUR-STORY BUILDINGS WITH PRIVATE
AND COMMON OPEN SPACES, SUBTERRANEAN PARKING, GARAGE
PARKING, SURFACE PARKING, COVERED PARKING, LANDSCAPING,
TRASH FACILITIES, AND A PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLIC LINEAR PARK ON A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3101-3191 N. GAREY AVENUE (APN:
8370-010-016, 8370-009-038)
*Please see attachment for emails submitted regarding this item.
DSD Deputy Director Ata Kahn and Senior Planner Alex Jimenez gave the staff presentation.
City of Pomona Page 13
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
Mayor Sandoval opened the public hearing.
The following public speakers spoke in opposition to the approval of Resolution No. 2024- 121.
Marvin Pyle Andrew Kane Wendy Fletcher
Helen Caldwell Charmagne Kane Adam Morales
Sean Caldwell Sonya Williamson Eva Figueroa
Nathan Placentia Victor Hernandez Jean
Lorraine Canales Mike Sutton Kate Chamber Misawa
Melinda Diaz Marilyn Hokanson Mary Kahn
The following public speakers submitted a speaker card opposing the approval of Resolution No. 2024-121 but did not wish to speak:
Gulanada Davis Macy Brooks
M. Joyce Bakersmith Marge Penner
Fereshich Maddad Virginia Ireland
Aisan Roulanina Keane Misawa
Public Speaker Hank Fung spoke in support of the approval of Resolution No. 2024-121.
Applicant Andrew Fogg spoke in support of the project.
Vice Mayor Garcia asked questions about the project and the newly added conditions, and expressed support for adding traffic control measures in the neighborhood. Vice Mayor Garcia agreed with many concerns voiced during public comment.
Mayor Sandoval asked questions about noticing standards for projects as they progress in the building process.
DSD Deputy Director Kahn answered Mayor Sandoval's questions, and Applicant Andrew Fogg commented on the newly requested conditions.
Councilmember Ontiveros-Cole asked questions to staff regarding traffic control measures.
Councilmember Ontiveros-Cole also commented on experiences with traffic hazards and the positive impacts traffic control measures had in her neighborhood.
City Manager Gutierrez and DSD Deputy Director answered Councilmember Ontiveros- Cole's questions.
Councilmember Lustro discussed concerns with traffic hazards in the area and expressed support for adding traffic control measures to the surrounding neighborhood.
Councilmember Lustro asked questions about the barriers that prevent the closing-off of streets and expressed interest in re-visiting the General Plan.
City of Pomona Page 14
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
DSD Deputy Director Kahn answered his questions.
Mayor Sandoval asked questions about the possibility of updating the general plan and City Manager Gutierrez advised the Planning Division would be drafting updates for it to ensure it aligns with the newly adopted Zoning code.
Councilmember Torres expressed support for adding speed bumps, for updating the General Plan, and for blocking off Grove St. Councilmember Torres also asked questions about measurable impacts.
Mayor Sandoval expressed City Council's commitment to update the General Plan.
Councilmember Preciado expressed support for updating the appeal process so that it becomes more efficient. Councilmember Preciado expressed support for implementing traffic control measures throughout the City. Councilmember Preciado asked questions to staff about the proposed development's security plan for the residence.
Applicant Andrew Fogg commented on the plans to ensure a safe residence for tenants.
Councilmember Nolte gave positive feedback to Senior Planner Jimenez in regards to the changes made to the project from initial submission and asked questions to staff about the development. Councilmember Nolte expressed support for studying the neighborhood to assess traffic hazards in the area once the project is completed.
DSD Deputy Director Kahn and City Engineer Arnold Dichosa answered Councilmember Nolte's questions.
Mayor Sandoval asked questions to staff and gave closing comments.
DSD Deputy Director Kahn read the updated conditions to the development.
City Manager Gutierrez requested a recess to allow staff and City Attorney Carvalho to review the language of the updated conditions.
Mayor Sandoval called a recess at 11:06 p.m.
Mayor Sandoval resumed the meeting at 11:15 p.m.
City of Pomona Page 15
City Council / Housing Authority / Meeting Minutes August 5, 2024 Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency
Senior Planner Jimenez read the added conditions as follows:
• Install 2 AC-powered speed radar feedback signs on Drake Street. • Install 2-3 speed humps with appropriate signage and markings on each of Grove Street between Gladstone Street and Shasta Street, and Drake Street between Garey and Cove Crest, subject to review of LA County Fire. If determined infeasible prior to Certificate of Occupancy, 2 AC powered speed radar feedback signs are to be installed in place at both Grove and Drake. Paving requirements along Drake Street to be determined by Public Works.
• Install 2 AC-powered speed radar feedback signs on Garey Avenue. • Parking Management Plan (PMP) to minimize overflow of on-street parking. • Applicant is to provide notification by mail to property owners and tenants within a 1,000 foot radius with a point of contact and 24-hour hotline for the contractor, prior to the commencement of demolition of the existing shopping center.
Mayor Sandoval requested the mail notification be extended to Gove, Florinda, and to the west of Foothill.
Applicant Fogg accepted the extended area to receive notification.
MOTION BY VICE MAYOR GARCIA, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER ONTIVEROS- COLE, CARRIED 7-0 to approve Resolution No. 2024-121 with the added conditions.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council meeting adjourned in honor of Police Sgt. Gary Elofson at 11:19 p.m. on August 5, 2024.
Respectfully submitted, ATTEST:
-
ROSALIA A. BUTLER, MMC TIM SANDOVAL
City Clerk/Secretary of the Pomona Mayor/Chair of the Pomona Housing Authority/Successor Agency to the Housing Authority/Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Agency
City of Pomona Page 16
Public Comment
From: charmaine kane
To: DeServicesComments
Subject: Petition for D-6 parking blockade with signatures.
Date: Monday, August 5, 2024 2:01:44 PM
Attachments: Petition for D-6 parklna blockade.odf
ATT00001,txt
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Petition for Traffic Control Measures in Our Neighborhood Subject: Request for Barricade Installation and Parking Permit Enforcement We, the undersigned residents of District 6 with the perimeters attached, urgently petition the Mayor of Pomona and the Pomona City Council to address the critical safety concerns arising from the expected increased traffic due to the construction of the new four-story apartment complex on the corner of Gary Avenue and Dawnview Avenue.
Key Requests:
1. Barricade Installation on Grove and Dawnview Avenue:
O To prevent the influx of non-residential traffic and ensure the safety of our children and all residents, we request the immediate installation of barricades at the strategic point on Grove Avenue, immediately west of Thompson Creek Wash (proposed location attached).
2. Establishment and Enforcement of a Parking Permit System:
• To manage and control parking within our neighborhood, we advocate for the implementation and strict enforcement of a parking permit system. This measure will prioritize parking for residents and deter overflow traffic from the new development.
Justification:
The upcoming construction of the four-story apartment complex on Gary Avenue and Grove Street will significantly increase traffic flow in our neighborhood, posing a safety risk for children and all residents and increase the overflow of street parking into oursingle-family home neighborhood. The narrow streets and limited parking space due to four existing apartment complexes and a large condominium complex surrounding the proposed four-story complex with 1,4 spots per unit parking accommodation on-site exacerbate the problem, creating hazardous conditions and reducing the quality of life and safety of the established single-family homes.
Objectives:
• Enhance pedestrian safety by reducing through-traffic. • Preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. • Ensure adequate parking for residents and their guests.
We urge the local authorities to take swift action on these requests to safeguard our community.
461!
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Examples of potential blockades:
Blockade could be something as simple as
concrete bollards (with reflectors) across the
road
Or, In keeping with the other side of Grove, a simple planter with a couple of trees and rellective signs (nole, a couple of trees cost less than the 14+ trees thal were planted along Garey with no Irrigation, so they died.) Could provide an additional 3-4 parking spots
Deltaros frandero Soak Enied Dur 1, Paco Heavy Outy Satery Sroot filind Cancrete Bal Sanely focard 5t Bourg 15,26
171M Pood YUROW CAPE F UNN H Find uns NEW ULPE H
$93.00 $43.00 8135.00 $110.00 $07.00 $298 00
OTHE ULNE LALINE USHE The Paine Catalog
6 Bollards across the street @ $110 - $660 + tAX
Installetion of Bollards • completed by City workers
Cost of closing sleet will cost less than It had cost to put up no parking signs on Covacrest District 6 Petilion for Parking and Blockade
Area represented in Petition (aka North Pomona Neighborhood Watch) North Pomona Neighborhood Watch group is comprised of people living within the following boundaries
To the North: The north side of Fuego Avenue, which includes all single-family residences located on both sides of Falcon Street
To the West: The west side of Florinda Street south to the cast side of Fulton Road To the South: The north side of Bonita Avenue berween Fulton Road and the Thomason Creek Flood Channel
To the East: The west side of the Thompson Creek food channel north to Fuego Street District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
2202222022
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
LATHIE NASH CONALA
POMONA, CA 91767
Brittanie Conaway 348 markway In. Alos
Pomora, 0A 91167
asheigh saa markusar
Barudlos Ln. Ponsora
CA 91747
Katherine 3262 Dawn View
Chamle. Ave romanialu.
41767
3262 Dawnueus
Keane Pombha, (A
Misawa 91767 Di
Amanda 360 makway in
perrotti pomana CA
91767
Wendy
Festches Pamonala 91769
Rasputo 3249 Dawbuiph
Lope' punone (A 946
Mark lope 1244 Hours
promons 2141925
DENNIS 3301 Derm itchin
DAWN VET
District 6 Petilion for Parking and Blockade
....
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
Robert Tores 501 Brookside In
comona, (a
4Г767
ssiukung solo Petrot it ditting
Pornona (A91767.
Paul Crasie
PanaNA 0t 91767
USCAN
HEZNADEZ POrONA CA
91747
Michelle Young
Jeffrey Young (a50 Botal in 3326
Margaret Are 40 Wariese Dit ton
456 Grant
Brandy more 456W Gravest
737 Brockede Der
Danielle Gran
District 6 Pelition for Parking and Blockadc
:ron......
2na4g1323222527
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address signature
335 markway
JEFF MOORE
POMONA, CARIET
Marilya 316D Rabin Wou
Mania,
Hopanson
VEANNE 3215 ROBIN May
POMONA, CA 91747 Same Maran
MUSARRA
MICHAEL 32/5 ROBIN WAX
MUSARRA PAMONA, CA 91767
BRIANNELS 3237 ROBIN WAY
POMONA, CA 91762
Leanne 3274 Robin Way Disrends
Cisneros pomona CA91767
Oscar
Cervants amant farats
Haven 3216 Robin
Salanze Way Pomona 91267
DANIEL IrECAND 3129 DAwN Vieso AN
Pomova Ca 91762
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
:222
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address
RussEll 3250 DAWNiEW Signature
SALAZ BMoNA, 91767
3250 Dawnvew Are
Cecilia C. Olmos Pomona, CA 91767 Sove
Willian 327 quagoful.
Ar chan Рономи СА.
91767
Sarah Archer 327 Furgo Ave
Pomona, CA 9767 Se
Deborah Arche 327 Fuego dre
Pornona 91767 Aluchar
monica Meyla 328 Fuego Are
Pomona CA
405 Fuego Ave
Bryan Delaz 13-e
Pomona, CA 91767
Marcela Vazquez 405 fuego Ave
Re pal.
sorrain
ariali
Bijan Tabrizi 3|50 DaunDrewtres.
Poon to His ladi
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address signature
Janice C, 3261Dawn зажее с.
Huber View tue.
tomona
PICK BERD 343 Fueg Tailed Forg
polona
Susan frouette 343 Fuevo
Rachevel Rannen 375 Fuego Rachaul h
3178 Falconst
Alex Soto Pomona, cA 9174) Alep Soto
melinda 305 Iyct melina Dear
Diaz pomana cA
91747
305 IVY CT
Ardeen Tave Pemora, CA91A)
Very And l 328 IvaG
349
Ashley lenkinter my Ct.
360 Fucgo Are
Anton Midas Pomona CA 1167)
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
I churry HARO
3278 Fan Cal o to
manuele Ho 3205 Falcon Manada Haro
A Colont 3225 Fland
Ashley Corona 3225 Falon st A hey corona
Patrio Busens 3185 Falconst
3169 Falcon lat Z
st
Gaitin Emmons
360 Fiego
Eva Figuera Marlos Aile
ANOREA WADE 3193 FReeN Shikee
BENJAMin 3209 FALCOn
GARCiA st Bayoo tao
Adam Alcocer Avenue 91767 lAMMen 3122 DawnView
%.
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address signature
Alma 350 Juy Ct.
Pomono, CH ay
Del Roal 91767
Andre's Del Rend 350 Iny It
Peronn A A171-
3113 слитно
Barbo
Panora la 91167
Susan Winders 3106 DawnView
Pomona, Siren Susan Winters
Stephon Winton 31061 can View
Perina (a 41167
John ABRAHAM 3034 PAWN alas
View Are Pomona
3R6DAWN VIEW
pan Aragon POMONA
JOHN
ARAGON
POMONA
ALFRED 3126 DAWN VIEN
ARAGON POMONA
FRANCES
ARAGON POMONA
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
Elsa Alcon 3388 Damnlieute Cl
Cera Alcon 3136 Daunviewse Cera Alcon
Daniel Alcon 3138 Dauntee
9147
Matthew Alcon 3138 DawViewive
91777
Harutun Moradian 31358 Daun View Hate fluli
91767
305Iuy ct
ChaRmaineve Ponova, 91768 Charmaintere
Avroux Valle 577 Fry
Alejanto Calado 7214 Dnia 142 h
91767
Heshamels st per
Chry antino sen
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blocknac
2...
too annaro
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
Kristie 3101 Florindu Kth
Promas
PonoM
3117 Florinia 51
Pamona
Ti fang brito 3117 Florinda st
Pomana
FlORENCE 3185176RiND AY
Me DoWElL POMEMA
Mabel 3149 Floridast (hotell
Hanken Pomona
MARiSOl so Brookside On
GuerrA Pomona
Victor 3141 Florinda
Moguel it pumma сн.
91767
Gayle 31665 Florindo
Brenenstall Pomona, CAt 9747 Bage E. reenstel
Carol Haris 36amoronas tolter.
Ishachadd
Becke p203 Forme
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockadc
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
Deborah "F/brinda
cuyle St.
Wenting 3235
zhang Flovinda St. Werelyshang
Aisan 3275 Florinda
Athari st ber.
МІКй 33275 florinda
ATHARI
Ainaz 3130 Florinda
Rouhaninia St. Sincl
Fereshtch 3130 Florinda Il. Heddad
Haddad St.
MARGE
PENNER dame
Matther 517 Brook Side
Myers lane
CHRIS 3137 RUBIN
BRAZZIlL
CODY BRAZZILI
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
- ..
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
adeniran
430 frenchin
Jose Rumona ca
Lin Fang 454 Franch Lu.
Lomona, cA
446 FRENCHLA
Deanna Bipee
TOMONA CA
Karen, Huff 442 French In
haw
CESAR 477 W. Envest.
SOLAND POMONA, CA. 1086
Barbara 469 W. Grave sE
Фотона СА
BeaT BARoNER
MinA BARDIE
DAVID DE AlVA 418 FRENCHLN.
Pomona, 06 91765 Jackd all ithe
Berkana Ballesters • Babra Setter
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Fesseer
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
DeR
Pomana
3u78 DAWNUIEW
Try o Rudwich Pomana
3054 DauNtieN C
Laura Abranam 3USU Daun sanstre
• LA.
Pomma, CA
421 Brooksole Ln.
Elijah Linon Pamora, CA
421 Breaksiße IN
MigueL A Limon Pomons (A. Mail AR
3113 Damn View
GReg Sonosky Pomona CA
Barbara, 3113 Dawn Viewt Barbara
3113 DaureView
DUKE LEDNG 372 FRENCH IN
PoMoNA CA. 91769 Suke Leng
Distric 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
ROSSLYNN PARGA
PomoNA 91767
424W. GROVEST
ADRIAN FATA POMONA THE C
Ofelia D.Ceped 488w. thorst.
of elia G. Cepida
TMRUHANKOL 520 W.GRVE8
Paul Tamalunas 15zo w. Grove st. ADat
Treena Limon 421 Broskside Ln
reen teren
PoMonG 91767
1469 BROOKSIDE Hennen!.
POMONA 917677 wook
Claudia Lopez Redique a
13s Breakside in ca s
Lemar Lopez 435 Broses dean Long tes
Pomora lo
9176)
Sabrina 3018 Dia Tt2
Rudnick
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
478 Perch lane
Armando Ballestras Pam, a plan elatio
3162 Florinda Si.
Lillian Nguyen Pomona, (A 916) Dollar dul
3192 FLORENON
Pomoss edann Padle E
32441 Flari maST
Rene Rance Panam Ca 91117
3260 Forindust KateuR.
Katten Lawson Pomanu CA 116M Dauber
3257 Falcon
Robertlian
Stersi Atrarado 3217 Falcon
3217 Falcon
Vic Alvarado IT Pomona Ca 9767
Josh Gover 3177 Falcon St.
Pomona CA 91767
Evelyn Steve 316t falca se aman a time?
District 6 Petition For Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
Ana
SOSNOVSKY romena LA
91767
Oksana 3121 Dawnview
Soshovsky Pomona cA Open Jandy
9176]
Nathan
pomana CA
Goshally 91767
Briana 3121 DawAvIeu
Dewees pomona CA 91767
carli 3064 paronvicro pile.
praff
30b6 Dawaviow Are
Carte antings
Pomona, CA9neT
Richard 3220 Florind. st
Pomone st
Casillas 976 e
Vincent 3228 Florinda
Que ine pomma, cA
Debra 2914 Deerbrook
Iterren Pomona, (4i27 pebid Xena
John 2979 Dearbrask
Herven Roman, CA 9177 Jo Sen
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
GARCELAA INELANS 3129 AAUN VIRUS ATE
Parlout A 91767 Quad Dal
RebECCA INANS
Paraur of 91707'
3129 DAWN UrEASAN
Pauloat of
DANiEL
3124 DinNEr Dul Mu POMONAGA
MACIOCE
3137
Korak Dawner
Mike 3137
okar
Jessica Fletcher 3ho mananas lane
Romana CA 4|167
37 Masking have
Chavez Porara Ca,9267 Balling
Dale Brooks 63 Markna on 9 Butt
rumana CA 21761
Macy Brooks Pomona Get Remarkuy Macp Brot
District 6 Pelition for Parking and Blockade
місиламаті
-i-i
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address signature
Chrystion 349 markway In
Banules POMAN/ CA 9176T
Anthony 328 fulfo
poman Frot
DENISE C. 347 FUEGO
TOPETE Pomona CA Depart
91767
MARIA FRAijO 3607 FUEGO Maria P. FRaijo
POMONA CA
91101
Martia Peles 3241 FaLLOusT mperes
Eva Pever 3241 Falcon Sl Sulley
AMPR
(ristopher bush 1427 Foohl bL aristi ther
D. Nathan Paeron 311 Ivy t
Inez Paceman 371 Ivy Ct
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
**** : іл
225.
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
PATRICK NATSH 3273 DAND RASAVE
dron diwenero
3273 Dawnurew
Diana Smith Pomona Ca
917ie2
3273 Dawarew
i essica smith porara 91761 destash
Elvia Alcodes 3122 Dawn Vick
А кепле, болона
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
3240 RUBIN WAY
PoMonA, CA 41767.
anil Mendental a Cros
District 6 Pelition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
3137 koben
Lori Brazzil AMora CA
3131 FOBIN
EMAn BRAZZIL WAY
2479 Deerbrook
Emily terren st, roman, A Smily ok
Amber 3249 Drawsu fear
•
District 6 Petition for Parking and Blockade
Signatures:
Name (please print) Address Signature
Laura delao 406 Brookside
H0, Bro Jamate Yao
Jesus De LaO
FRANCISCO LOPEZ 430 BROOKSIDELN
PoMONA CA 91767
438 Broukside Fair Joys
Lopez As Panana A
MikE 3158 DAWnVIeW nite
ISONAS Pomon a 491707 Troves
EVETTE 3158 DAWNVieW
20m0n449167 Gital nons
TSONAS
M
Robles, Diana Consent Item #9
From: Hank Fung <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 2:16 PM
To: City Clerk
Subject: Fwd: 1707 N Towne Ave project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Please include in the record for item 9 on the city council agenda for August 5. Thank you.
Hank Fung
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Tam, Vinny" <[email protected]>
Date: June 24, 2024 at 7:48:57 AM PDT
To: "[email protected] [email protected]" < [email protected]>, "Khan, Ata" <[email protected]>
Ce: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: RE: 1707 N Towne Ave project
Thank you for your correspondence. It will be included in the public record.
Best,
Vinny Tam, AICP (he/him) | Senior Planner
City of Pomona | 505 S. Garey Ave.
Pomona, CA 91769 | (909) 620-2284
[email protected]
From: [email protected] [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2024 9:56 PM
To: Tam, Vinny <Vinny. [email protected]>; Khan, Ata <Ata. [email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: 1707 N Towne Ave project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Planning Commission,
I support the 1707 N. Towne Ave. project completely. The project will activate a corner which has been unused for almost a decade, since the church moved its programs out of the building there. The types of units provided are family units - 3 and 4 bedroom - which will help increase the number of students in Pomona schools, which have suffered through several closures, notably of Montvue Elementary about a mile to the east. Pomona needs all types of housing, but a shortage of family housing is especially acute as many of the available affordable apartments are one and two bedroom, and this will enable people to grow their families while still living in Pomona. The location is close to the freeway and so the new development will meet the current California Building Codes, which require a MERV 13 filtration for new buildings that should substantially reduce the health risk being near the fieeway. 1 Under SB 330, the Planning Commission must find substantial evidence to deny a compliant project. The City of Pomona is short on all of its Regional Housing Needs Assessment targets. During the last Housing Element cycle, the City of Pomona claimed it was "pro- housing" and is implementing programs to meet that aspiration. This project will comply with the Inclusionary Housing ordinance and will provide moderate income units. As staff has indicated, the project falls within the SB 330 criteria and should be approved without delay.
Sincerely,
Hank Fung
576 Lincoln Ave
Pomona, CA 91767
2 Robles, Diana Consent Item #9
From: Diana Butcher < [email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 10:00 AM
To: City Clerk
Subject: Agenda Item #9 City Council Meeting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Hello:
We are writing in support for the cancellation of the proposed housing project for the corner of N. Towne and San Bernardino in Pomona.
This project is wholly unsuitable for our neighborhood as it borders on the Lincoln Park Historical District. As has been stated and demonstrated it will create havoc in our neighborhood. Increased traffic, speeding incidents and nightmarish parking issues will seriously Impact everyone in our neighborhood.
The project includes too many units which will have a serlous Impact on the abllity for first responders to respond to emergencies there. It will be very difficult for large fire trucks and other emergency vehicles to maneuver within that complex due to the density of units and the planned inadequate entrances and exits of the project.
Of particular concern is the very sharp left hand turn that is being planned for cars leaving the complex, to access the 10 freeway. This will most certainly cause serious backups for those trying to leave the complex to get onto the freeway in the mornings. There will also be serious traffic issues in the afternoons for people trying to get to their homes there after a workday. Add to this the large volume of cars already traveling through Lincoln Park during the mornings and afternoons and you will see an absolute nightmare of numbers of vehicles all moving through adjacent neighborhoods at these times. Along these routes are families with children who are already impacted with the volume of traffic coming through our streets. This is now a safety issue which is well documented and will only Increase to even more alarming levels should this project be bullt.
Lastly, we are concerned about the historical tree that is located on the project property. That tree, per the City Planning Department statement at the recent Planning Commission meeting was identified in 1964 as an historically significant tree. It is just outside of the Lincoln Park Historical District, where it would have been protected as a significant tree. It Is close to 75 years old and should and deserves to be protected from destruction.
We would ask the City Council to rescind the approval for this project due to the reasons outlined in this emall and for many other reasons. There are many vacant pleces of property throughout the city more suitable for this project. It is not sultable for this piece of property due to the very serious safety issues it will cause as well as other concerning issues,
Thank you for your consideratlon.
Dan and Diana Butcher
1450 N. Gibbs St.
Pomona, CA 91767
1 Robles, Diana Consent Item *9
From: Mitch Elias < [email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 2:34 PM
To: City Clerk
Subject: Approve to Appeal Planning Commission Decision for Item No. 9 of the Agenda CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Good Evening Mayor and Council,
I reviewed the Planning Commission Resolution Attachment No. 2 and strongly oppose this project. My concerns are as follows:
The plan calls for 45 units in total. The plan calls for 134 parking spaces but is being reduced to 102 parking spaces which is approximately 2 parking spaces per unit. Where is the over flow parking? Will there be restrictions on the amount of vehicles allowed per unit? The housing project at Gary Ave and Bonita (The Gabriel) is a perfect example of what can be expected. There are vehicles that now line Bonita Ave both East and West of Garey Ave due to inadequate parking.
How are the residents just south of San Bernardino Road be affected? Will parking permits be issued to protect the residents?
Based on the amount of units and the expected amount of vehicles, the following streets will be inundated with traffic:
Towne Ave. (currently already challenged)
San Bernardino Ave (currently already challenged)
N Palomares St (dramatic increase due to the left hand closure at McKinley Ave) N Gibbs St (will see a major increase in traffic)
E McKinley Ave (will see a major increase in traffic)
Since the main entrance is at San Bernardino Ave., I expect traffic will be extremely heavy on both sides of San Bernardino Ave., N Palomares St and N Towne Ave. This will be a major log jam.
With the left turn closer of E McKinley Ave at Towne Ave., the traffic going up N Palomares St and San Bernardino Ave have increased exponentially. Traffic accidents and close call collision with vehicles and pedestrians have become a major challenge just to access the 10 freeway. What has or will be done to mitigate this added exposure?
While I do understand the need for additional housing, I strongly believe that the location does not lend itself to high density housing that will only have a negative impact to the location. Not enough has been done by the owner/developer to alleviate the concerns for parking, traffic and most importantly, the negative impact it will present to the neighboring community.
1 Thank You.
Best Regards,
Mitch Elias
[email protected]
Robles, Diana Consent Item #9
From: Butler, Rosalia
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 9:53 AM
To: Robles, Diana
Subject: FW: Housing Project Towne/San Bernardino
For minutes.
----Original Message--..
From: Patti Amelotte <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 8:36 AM
To: Butler, Rosalia <Rosalia. [email protected]>
Subject: Housing Project Towne/San Bernardino
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Hello,
My name is Patti Amelotte. I live at 390 E. Kingsley Ave. Pomona, 91767 I am a resident of Lincoln Park and come home from work turning southbound onto Towne from the eastbound 10 freeway. The traffic is very bad at that intersection. I have seen many accidents or near accidents there. An Increase in traffic, parking and congestion from a 45 unit complex would be horrible. A 3 story complex would be way out of scale for that spot.
The speeding that goes on down Towne also makes this a bad idea.
I ask that the city council and city planners revisit this issue and scale the project way back. I understand the need for housing but this size of this project and location are not good.
Thank you,
Patti Amelotte
310-995-7171
Sent from my iPad
1 Robles, Diana P.H. Item 13
From: Kathie Conaway <Kathie [email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2024 8:36 AM
To: City Clerk; Sandoval, Tim; Nolte, John; Preciado, Victor; Garcia, Nora; Ontiveros-Cole, Elizabeth; Lustro, Steve; Torres, Robert
Ce: andrew kane
Subject: FW: CC Public Comment 8-05-2024
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
I neglected to copy the Mayor, the City Council or the City Clerk.
I would also like to request that all emalls and other documentation that are received (however many there might be) will be included in the minutes of the Public Hearing on 8/5/2024 and posted in a timely manner. Thank you for your service for the City of Pomona.
KATHIE NAISH CONAWAY
Cell 909-762-9939
From: Kathie Conaway
) Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2024 2:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: andrew kane <[email protected]>
Subject: CC Public Comment 8-05-2024
City of Pomona Mayor and City Council -
lam compelled, yet again, to volce my deep dissatisfaction and frustration with the recent approval of the four-story apartment complex at the intersection of Garey Avenue and Grove Street. While I don't mind additional housing and understand the need for it, I fail to see the due diligence the should have been expended to make this effort more acceptable to the existing residents that are impacted by this project, rather than appeasing the builder and their desires. It is extremely concerning that the City has approved this plan with an emphasis on providing a small number of units for low-income housing to assist renters, and Ignoring the needs and best interests of actual property owners.
According to Miranda Sheffield at the last City Council meeting, the City of Pomona has a 60% renters rate compared to a 40% property owner rate, yet the City continues to cater to renters and focus on bringing more renters into the city, without any consideration to those of us that pay property taxes and are vested in the city. Renters come and go (not all, I understand that) and will move on to another city without a care. They are not concerned with things like property values and impacts that things like traffic, parking and congestion have to it.
With the unmitigated plans for the subject apartment complex, the City plans to filter all residents from the new apartment complex onto two small side streets without any consideration for the impacts on traffic in our quiet single- family home residential community. Adding more than 600 cars (likely closer to 800) to the immediate area while only accommodating around 400 parking spots impacts not only parking but also the throughput of traffic through our neighborhood to get to the 210 Freeway or down to the 10 Freeway, There are already four large apartment complexes on that block, with an additional small complex across the street on Garey Avenue and a big condo complex across Grove Avenue, and there Is already nowhere for these existing tenants to park. Adding additional cars is outrageous 1 when the apartment complex is only addressing 1,4 cars per unit, which we are all very well aware will not suffice. The rent for those apartments, if keeping on par with The Gabriel right down the street at $3,500 per month does not really allow for a single resident in a unit, or potentially even two, both of whom would have a car (in the best case scenario.) Blocking all exits onto Garey Avenue due to the elevation issues they are facing, along with the park they included to make it aesthetically pleasing, is unacceptable. Quite frankly, no one but the homeless and drug users will utilize that park, increasing crime in our area with a nice manicured place for them to carry on. Because of this design, 1 am requesting approval to block Grove Street at the wash will help mitigate the traffic issue, and establishing and requiring a parking permit for our single-family home community to help prevent all of these cars from trickling into our neighborhood, seeking somewhere to leave their car and finding the fastest way to a freeway. We pride ourselves on our little gem within Pomona and do not want to see it diminished to a racetrack or parking lot like so much of Pomona has become. I have said it before and will reiterate this point - it is your responsibility, as the elected governing body of the City to represent and protect your constituents. While it is important to pay attention to all city residents, stop focusing solely on renters and rental property and give the property owners/residents your focus for a minute and do what is best for us. Support us!
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your decision to comply with the community requests of a street blockade and permitted parking.
Kathie Naish Conaway
Cell 909-762-9939
Privacy Notice
2 Robles, Diana P. H. Item*3
From: P. C. Naish <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2024 12:08 PM
To: DevServices Comments; City Clerk; Sandoval, Tim; Nolte, John; Preciado, Victor; Garcia, Nora; Ontiveros-Cole, Elizabeth; Lustro, Steve; Torres, Robert Cc: Patrick Carrol Naish; P. C. Naish
Subject: CC Public Comment 8/05/2024
Attachments: Pomona City Council Letter 072924.docx
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Hello.
Please find attached our letter, which represents five residents of North Pomona (District #6), in regards to the housing project slated for the intersection of Garey Avenue and Grove Street.
We would prefer to be in attendance at the Meeting set for August 5, 2024 (my band is playing a Concert In The Park in Claremont). So please do not let our absence from the meeting be construed as a diminished resolve in this matter. Our large contingent of Residents arequite united in this endeavor to protect our neighborhood.
Thanks very much,
Patrick Carrol Naish
1 July 29, 2024
City of Pomona Mayor and City Council -
We are writing to you as a follow-up to our attendance to the July 15'h Meeting in Council Chambers. Specifically, our concern is regarding the proposed housing project to be located at the intersection of Garey Avenue and Grove Street.
1, Patrick Naish, have lived in this neighborhood since June, 1965.
Many of my childhood friends have purchased homes here, as we all cherish this area. But that affection can get snuffed out quickly if this project goes through without any consideration for the effect on the surrounding areas of such a project.
As proposed, it is clear to those of us who have analyzed the details, that our neighborhood would be inundated with both additional parked cars and, more importantly, increased traffic. In many cases, that traffic would be speeding through our streets. This would certainly create havoc on those of us who have Invested in this neighborhood and City for so many years. We are not temporary! And the safety of our children, grandchildren and pets have been seemingly ignored throughout this process.
We were told that traffic surveys were completed. However, those surveys were completed in 2012, a full 12 years agol Those numbers are completely invalid now and to even reference them Is preposterous. Additionally, the effects on Police and Fire services were apparently not seriously considered., as they are already stretched beyond acceptable levels.
A very high percentage of the additional 600-800 vehicles will CERTAINLY flow through our neighborhoods. This would not only be aggravating but would unquestionably present a safety issue.
As presented at the July 15' Meeting, the blocking of all Garey Ave. exits simply so that a "park" could be implemented in front of the complex makes no sense whatsoever. Aside from the fact that residents would likely not utilize a park that is adjacent to a busy boulevard, it would undoubtedly be a magnet for transients and drug users.
Since this project was approved and we are forced to accept its completion, we are requesting that a block be inserted at the Thompson Creek Wash to avert such traffic issues. Furthermore, to address the overflow of parking of the new renters, we ask that a parking permit program be established whereas anyone parking their vehicle must posses a permit issued only to us residing in single-family homes.
Many parts of Pomona have deteriorated significantly since I, Patrick, was born in 1961. We then lived in Westmont, across from General Dynamics. Our area in North Pomona routinely gets compliments from City Officials, Police Officers and visiting friends, as they recognize the cleanliness in the neighborhood and the pride of the residents. But this can all change if this building goes in without any rational mitigation and rectification.
For years, we have counted on our City Council to look out for us, especially since we have invested so much into our community. But now, we feel that the City is more concerned with the investor of this project than they are with us fellow residents.
Please put yourselves in our position and ask yourselves "what would I do if this were my neighborhood?". And would you want your kids and Grandkids to be exposed to such an imminent threat? Investments to make our City better is welcomed. Allegiance to outsiders is not.
Sincerely,
Patrick Carrol Naish
Diane Smith
Jessica Smith
Brian Jiminez
... and Joseph Hernandez (10 years old)
3273 DawnView Ave. Pomona, CA 91767
3 Jimenez, Alex P.H. Item *13
From: DeServicesComments
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 12:35 PM
To: Jimenez, Alex
Subject: FW: Public comment 8-05-2024
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 7:26 AM
To: DevServicesComments<[email protected]> Subject: Public comment 8-05-2024
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Hello Mr. Mayor and council persons, friends and neighbors the proposed four story apartment complex slated for north Garey and Grove does have positive and negative implications
• yes we need affordable housing
• yes we need the revenue
has a survey been done on the PARKING, schools, parks, greenspace, social srvices, along with the over populatilon SATURATION of the area ? a survey transparency could settle nerves • Parking seems to be just one reason our friends and neighbors are petitioning the project but there are more reasons to take time to think this out
• Ideas provide a parking structure similar to the one on Garey and Bonita utilize the parking at Superior market Garey and Foothill with collobration of stores who reside there lessen the amount of dwellings proposed
• the homeless population continues to grow in this area the foothill corridor is popular to homeless from Towne ave. west to White ave, only Pomona city limits the Claremont and La Vere sides do not have the issue why? Thank You to district 6 councilman Mr Torres for appealing and giving the community more time to ponder this project
1 From: Helen Caldwell
TO: DeServicesComments
City Council Meeting 8/5/2024 Public Comment
Monday, August 5, 2024 11:06:57 AM
P.H. Item #13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
As a mother of two young boys (ages 6 and 8) and a resident living just a block west of th proposed building site on Garey and Grove, I am deeply concerned about the safet implications of this project.
The current proposal for a high-density building lacks thorough assessment and transparency.
A 2014 traffic study for a now-defunct shopping center does not suffice for this new project.
Our infrastructure is already strained, and adding over 750 residents will exacerbate the situation.
Speeding cars frequently use our street as a shortcut from Garey, causing several dangerou:
ncidents: a neighbor's parked car was hit twice, another neighbor had a car crash into thei house, and my niece was nearly hit by a speeding car. Our small block is home to 12 children aged 0 to 10, and their safety is at serious risk.
To address these issues, I propose the following safety measures:
1. Install a blockade at the wash.
2. Add speed bumps to slow down traffic.
3. Erect a flashing speedometer to monitor speeds.
4. Implement preferential or permitted parking.
These measures are vital, especially considering the proposed building's only exit is on Grove.
Turge you to prioritize the safety of our children and the well-being of our community by voting against the build in its current form.
Thank you for your consideration. Kindly confirm receipt and admittance to public record.
Sincerely,
Helen Caldwell
Proud Pomona Community Member
From: Sean Caldwell
To: DeServicesComments
Subject: City Council Meeting 8/5/2024 Public Comment
Date: Monday, August 5, 2024 11:11:51 AM P.H Item 113
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
As a father of to young boys (ages 6 and 8) and a resident living just a block west of the proposed building site on Garey and Grove, I am deeply concerned about the safely implications of this project.
The current proposal for a high-density building lacks thorough assessment and transparency. A 2014 traffic study for a now-defunct shopping center does not suffice for this new project. Our infrastructure is alrendy strained, and adding over 750 residents will exacerbate the situation.
Speeding cars frequently use our street as a shortcul from Garey, causing several dangerous incidents: a neighbor's parked car was hit twice, another neighbor had a car crash into their house, and my niece was nearly hit by a speeding car. Our small block is home to 12 children aged 0 to 10, and their safety is al serious risk.
To address these issues. I propose the following safety measures:
Install a blockade at the wash.
Add speed bumps to slow down traffic.
Erect a flashing speedometer to monitor speeds.
Implement preferential or permitted parking.
These measures are vital, especially considering the proposed building's only exit is on Grove.
I urge you to prioritize the safety of our children and the sell-being of our community by voting against the build in ils current form.
Thank you for your consideration. Kindly confirm receipt and admittance to public record.
Sincerely,
Sean Caldwell
From: Leanne Cisneros
To: DeServicesComments
Subject: Monday, August 5, 202 1-40-7 AM
Date: P.H. Item *13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
To whom it may concern:
This is to express concern regarding the new housing development on Gary and Grove here in Pomona, I am a resident and live on Robin Way. My fiancé's work fruck and thousands of dollars worth of tools was stolen in May 2024. We've had vehicles and catalytic converters stolen from the area in recent mouths.
My other concern is those using the neighborhood as a short cut coming from Garey up Grove to get to Foothill.
They do not obey the speed limit making it very unsafe and putting innocent people/children at risk of injury. The neighborhood has many families walking or riding bikes.
A solution to greatly minimize the safely and risk hazards are a blockade on Grove al Thompson Creek to minimize the added traffic coming through and to deter thieves fiom entering the neighborhood.
Speed bumps would also reduce safety concers and speed for those that do come through the neighborhood.
Thank you,
Leanne Cisneros
Sent from my iPhone
Robles, Diana P.H. Item #13
From: Lydia Myers < [email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 1:07 PM
To: DevServicesComments; Sandoval, Tim; Nolte, John; Preciado, Victor; Garcia, Nora; Ontiveros-Cole, Elizabeth; Lustro, Steve; City Clerk; Torres, Robert Cc: Mitmatt ©©Myers; [email protected]
Subject: CC Public Comment 8-05-2024
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on elicking links from unknown senders.
To the City of Pomona Planning Commission, City Council Members, Staff, and Community, I am submitting this letter in advance of the public hearing scheduled for Monday, the 5th of August, 2024, to request that the city council hold on the approval of the proposed building project under DPR 72-2024. We as a city have the opportunity to add conditions to the building project for the betterment of the community along with mitigations requested by current residents, and I request that the council prioritize these actions before the project is allowed to proceed. Now is the time to take action, and to perform the due diligence to ensure that this project benefits rather than damages our community.
We heard from members of the community at the July 15th city council meeting, emphasizing the need for housing and jobs. However, the fact that these developments do not have any commitment to what the cost of rent will be and that there is no rent control means that we can easily miss the mark of addressing this | community need, Additionally only 19 of the units are dedicated to affordable housing - we can and should do better. The landlord behind this proposal has previously been taken to court over pressuring disabled people and minorities out of their properties in order to raise rent. How are we ensuring this will not happen again? What accountability will the developer have to our community? As a member of the local community and a resident I am requesting that the City of Pomona take action to improve upon the current state of our neighborhood, our environment, our traffic, our safety, our infrastructure, and our community. Prior to any new developments, I expect my city officials and planners to not only adhere to the minimum requirements of state law, but to perform due diligence to study the impact of such developments and to ensure that appropriate requirements and mitigations are put in place for the benefit of the community BEFORE proceeding.
Please request the following from the developer/builder:
-The Developer is requested to plan for a MINIMUM of 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit with additional spaces for guests and visitors on the premises of the new development -The Developer is requested to provide a detailed construction plan that minimizes disruption to the community, including limits on construction hours and routes that avoid residential areas -The Developer is requested to take documented measures to minimize noise and air pollution during and after constructions, such as sound barriers and dust control plans. 1 In the best interest of the existing community and for any future residents who may join our community, I request the City of Pomona also follow through with the following actions PRIOR to moving forward with the new development:
-The City is requested to perform and provide full and thorough environmental impact study (not just a "review") to be carried out by the City of Pomona with outcomes and recommendations made publicly available -The City of Pomona is requested to perform a traffic study to include current traffic flow and the impact of added vehicles to Grove Ave, from Garey Ave to Fulton Road -The City of Pomona is requested to install a permanent fixture that prevents vehicles from driving on Grove Ave. at the wash to slow traffic and for the safety of pedestrians -The City of Pomona is requested to perform assessment and plan to ensure the power grid is capable of not only supplying electricity to the current area reliably, but that the addition of new units is able to be supported by SoCal Edison
-The City of Pomona is requested to perform assessment and plan to ensure the city infrastructure and services of water, sewage and trash are accounted for in the anticipated cost and impact of these new developments -The City of Pomona is requested to provide a plan for an increase in Emergency Services to ensure there is timely support and response when needed in the local area -The City of Pomona is requested to use the outcomes and recommendations of all above studies to create action plans and implement appropriate mitigations where necessary, and to deny the project from moving forward as proposed if there is no feasible way to mitigate detrimental effects of the development Additional comments and considerations:
Environmental Review:
Has the city council been able to ensure that the building will adhere to all of the zoning laws and environmental regulations currently in place?
Per SB 406, affordable housing project funding by the State is exempt from CEQA review if review is already being undertaken by a separate agency (i.e., the project's lead agency). Per the notice of public hearing that was provided, the City of Pomona as the lead agency has conducted an environmental review. I request that the City of Pomona as the lead agency on this project provide the full report of the environmental review that is being claimed in place of CEQA review under this exemption to show what the actual impact of this specific new development is expected to be prior to moving forward. A statement that a review was conducted is not sufficient. If the review that was conducted by the city did not include any analysis to take into account the details of this specific proposal along with possible impacts and recommendations for mitigation, then the City should perform further study and analysis to ensure it does not approve planning projects that can be detrimental to an existing community.
Traffic Studies:
The most recent traffic study that was used to inform the approval of this project was carried out in 2014 and is not representative of the current state of traffic in the community.
I request that the City of Pomona plan and perform traffic studies on the current location to assess the impact on the traffic in the immediate and surrounding areas of the proposed new development. Due to the pre-existing high density housing in the area, the street parking in the immediate vicinity is fully utilized overnight with no other parking aside from the nearby residential communities. This, along with the expected number of adult residents with cars that are planned to be residents of the new development needs to be accounted for with / proposed solutions by the developer and the city. The bare minimum requirement of 1.4 parking spaces per unit may be feasible in areas where street parking is available; however the current utilization of street parking means there is no open space. The development should therefore account for the actual number of expected 2 vehicles to be added by residents and provide a minimum of 2 parking spaces per unit with additional spaces available to guests and visitors of residents.
Per the City of Pomona Transportation Study Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment
"A TS which includes LOS analysis shall be required for a proposed project when either the AM or PM peak hour trip generation from the proposed development is expected to exceed 50 vehicle trips (without consideration of pass-by trips). Traffic study may be required for smaller projects based on land use and location per City's discretion."
This new 289 unit dwelling that is being proposed far exceeds the City of Pomona's guidelines for warranting a traffic study. In fact, more than 50 vehicle trips will likely be added in every direction of entry and exit for the dwelling.
Proposed Road Closure to Adjacent Neighborhood;
One mitigation to the impact of the added vehicles to the neighborhood community is the construction of a permanent planter on Grove Ave, to the West of the wash. Such a fixture can allow pedestrian access but prevent vehicle access to ensure that the neighboring community is not used as a through-way to traffic, and ot loss of life in order for the city to react or take action to ensure we keep our streets safe, and am strongly in favor of closing off vehicle access to Grove Ave, in light of the proposed addition of high density housing and added vehicles.
City Infrastructure:
Prior to moving forward with this project, I request that the City of Pomona provide a plan for ensuring that city infrastructure can support the addition of hundreds of new residents in a new high density development.
Currently, residents in the immediate area experience regular power outages due to the high demand on the power grid. What is the plan to ensure that this will not only improve, but that plans are put in place to provide sufficient reliable power to new developments?
In addition to power, the City of Pomona needs to ensure that the existing sewage, trash, and water infrastructure is capable of supporting this expansion and that the additional costs and impacts of expanding and maintaining city infrastructure are fully understood and accounted for.
As more residents are brought into a high density living area, there will be additional needs for support from Police, Fire, and Emergency services, How can the City of Pomona expect to provide and maintain a safe and upported new community development when the police force does not currently have the full number of swor fficers that the budget allows for? Will the budget for officers and the hiring of new officers increase t account for the growing population? Will the fire department get additional trucks and staff? Please provide data on the current response time for Pomona emergency services to the local area with a plan on how this will be improved upon and accounted for with the increase in dwelling units and residents.
Thank you for prioritizing the well-being and betterment of our City and our Community during planning considerations.
I look forward to seeing action taken by our City leaders and officials to address the points submitted within this letter.
Signed, a Concerned Local Resident,
Lydia de Pillis-Lindheim
517 Brookside Ln
Pomona, CA 91767
3 From: Helen Caldwell
To: DevServicesComments
Subject: DPR 72-2024 City Council Meeting 8/5/2024 Public Comment Date: Monday, August 5, 2024 1:25:39 PM
P. H. Item #13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
As a mother of two young boys (ages 6 and 8) and a resident living just a block west of the proposed building site on Garey and Grove, I am deeply concerned about the safety implications of project DPR 72-2024.
The current proposal for a high-density building lacks thorough assessment and transparency.
As is the apartment complex will cause my property value to go down. A 2014 traffic study for a now-defunct shopping center does not suffice for this new project. Our infrastructure is already strained, and adding over 750 residents will exacerbate the situation.
Speeding cars frequently use our street as a shortcut from Garey, causing several dangerous incidents: a neighbor's parked car was hit twice, another neighbor had a car crash into their house, and my niece was nearly hit by a speeding car. Our small block is home to 12 children aged 0 to 10, and their safety is at serious risk.
To address these issues, 1 propose the following safety measures:
1. Install a blockade at the wash.
2. Add speed bumps to slow down traffic.
3. Erect a flashing speedometer to monitor speeds.
4. Implement preferential or permitted parking.
These measures are vital, especially considering the proposed building's only exit is on Grove.
Turge you to prioritize the safety of our children and the well-being of our community by voting against the build in its current form.
This is not about public housing. The building owner refuses to state how much rent for these units will be. He has a history of illegal, discriminatory and racist behavior toward Latinos and the disabled. The building owner previously settled a lawsuit where he illegally evicted disabled people of color in order to raise the rent. Why does Pomona want to do business with a man that spits down on minorities? I know this isn't Beverly Hills or even Santa Barbara but your residents work hard for what they have and we deserve better than what this millionaire Please confirm receipt and submittal for public comment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Helen Caldwell
Proud Pomona Resident
Robles, Diana
From: Helen Caldwell <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 20243:14 PM
To: Sandoval, Tim; Nolte, John; Preciado, Victor; Garcia, Nora; Ontiveros-Cole, Elizabeth; Lustro, Steve; City Clerk; Torres, Robert
Subject: DPR 72-2024 City Council Meeting 8-5-2024 Public Comment CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
As a mother of two young boys (ages 6 and 8) and a resident living just a block west of the proposed building site on Gavey and Grove, I am deeply concerned about the safety implications of project DPR 72-2024.
The current proposal for a high-density building lacks thorough assessment and transparency. As is, the apartment complex will cause my property value to go down. A 2014 traffic study for a now-defunct shopping center does not suffice for this new project. Our infrastructure is already strained, and adding over 750 residents will further exacerbate the situation.
Speeding cars frequently use our street as a shortcut from Garey, causing several dangerous incidents: a neighbor's parked car was hit twice, another neighbor had a car crash into their house, and my niece was nearly hit by a speeding car. Our small block is home to 12 children aged 0 to 10, and their safety is at serious risk.
To address these issues, I propose the following safety measures:
1. Install a blockade at the wash.
2. Add speed bumps to slow down traffic.
3. Erect a flashing speedometer to monitor speeds.
4. Implement preferential or permitted parking.
These measures are vital, especially considering the proposed building's only exit on Grove.
I urge you to prioritize the safety of our children and the well-being of our community by voting against the build in its current form.
DPR 72-2024 is not about improving public housing. The building owner refuses to state how much rent for these units will be. He has a history of illegal, discriminatory and racist behavior toward Latinos and the disabled. The building owner previously settled a lawsuit where he illegally evicted disabled people of color in order to raise the rent. Why does Pomona want to do business with a man that spits down on minorities? I know this isn't Beverly Hills or even Santa Barbara but your residents work hard for what they have and we deserve better than what this millionaire builder plans to do to our little neighborhood.
Please confirm receipt and submittal for public comment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Helen Caldwell
Proud Pomona Resident
1 From: Rosenda Mosqueda
To: DeServicesComments
Subject: Public comment 8-05-202
Date: Monday, August 5, 2024 4:15:49 PM
P.H. Item #13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Pomona Council,
Our names are Rosie & Gilbert Mosqueda. As concerned Pomona Residents and a family who has owned the residence on Fulton Road since 1979 we write with growing concern. ### Argument for Approving Blockade at Grove Ave & Thompson Creek Wash The proposed blockade at Grove Ave and Thompson Creek Wash is a crucial measure to address the significant Increase i comic on nary a Fely dreame i reno are is up and the proposed eh posteral risks to the local community.
#### Increased Traffic and Speeding
In recent years, the volume of vehicles traversing Fulton Road & Grove St. has surged. This influx of traffic has not only disrupted the peace of the neighborhood but has also resulted in a noticeable increase in speeding cars. The once quiet residential street now faces the dangers of high-speed traffic, creating a hazardous environment for pedesins, particularly children and eldery residens, An apartment complex will ignificanty ices this #### Parking Issues
The increased number of vehicles will also exacerbated parking problems. Residents have found it increasingly causing inconvenience and heightening the risk of vehicle-related incidents. #### Safety Concerns
The primary concern for the residents of Grove St. & Fulton Road is safely. The increased traffic and speeding cars endanger pedestrians and cyclists. There have been near-miss incidents involving children playing in their yards and crossing the street. There is a constant issue with vehicles surpassing cars going the residential speed limit, newly imposed. Moreover, the lack of multiple signage and no enforcement is making the problems only increase. ### Conclusion
The blockade at Grove St, and Thompson Creek Wash is not merely a measure to reduce traffic; it is a necessary Intervention to restore safely and tranquility to the neighborhood. By redirecting traffic away from Grove St. and Fulton Road, we can significantly mitigate the risks posed by increased traffic and speeding, alleviate parking issues, and most importantly, protect the well-being of our community members. The safety of our residents should be the top priority, and approving this blockade is a step in the right direction.
We thank you for your time and consideration,
Sincerely
Rosie & Gilbert Mosqueda
Fulton Road Pomona CA
Sent from my iPhone
From: Mia Vakdez
To: DeServicesComments
Subjecti Public Comment Project DPR 72-2024
Date: Monday, August 5, 2024 5:17:41 PM
P.H. Item *13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I am a mother of two young boys and live not far from the proposed building site on Garey Ave (project DPR 72-2024). Like numerous others, I have many concerns regarding this development. There has not been proper studies of impact of traffic in the area, which already suffers from speeding cars cutting through from Garey. We have a lot of young families like ours in the area that walk, bike, and play in the area, and I've seen numerous close calls by speeding cars coming down Grove. Adding a residential structure that will house hundreds more people will add to this issues.
If this project moved forward, I suggest—at the very least-adding speed bumps, caution signs, or even a blockade at the wash on Grove
Please confirm receipt and submittal for public comment. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Certified Professional Makeup Artist
Website
Eacebook
Instagram
From: Andrew Kane
DeServicesComments
Subject: Public Comment D-6
Date: Monday, August 5, 20245:41:09 PM P.H. Item #13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Good evening, Mr. Mayor, fellow council members and city staff. My name is Andrew Kane and I am a 25 year homeowner in the extreme North Pomona community that will be directly affected by the proposed project unless public safety mitigations are implemented
• we need current traffic mitigation that includes detailed traffic studies, and the implementation of traffic calming measures. Our neighborhood cannot sustain the impact this development will bring without mitigating it BEFORE it becomes a problem.
• We MUST block off Grove Street by Thompson Creek. City Council and staff should've received a copy of CAD drawings of various possible ways of doing it. We not also furnished CAD drawings but also a cost breakdown for various solutions of the blockade. In that pocket you have in front of you you will see a petition with nearly 200 signatures that were generated in less than 72 hours from our community. We need this. This is public safety. • We need to add more speed bumps where they are not currently located Like Brookside Ln., Markway Avenue and Robin Way.
• We need increased police enforcement for traffic mitigations. • We must have updated traffic studies/input that is not over 10 years old provided by the developer and the city
The planning commission and the city council must not only listen, but HEAR the community and our plea for help. It is your job to oversee what's best for the city, the community and most importantly public safety. Fast-tracking such projects because Sacramento politicians rubber stamp them does not mean you have to.
Lastly, I am all for affordable housing, but really, the bonuses this developer was allotted is not going help anyone with affordable housing. I will close with this. I feel sorry for the residence of this project for the simple reason they are going to stress out when they realize they have absolutely no place to park and they will have to park so far away from their home that they will be forced to walk past the unhoused, drug addicts, and just blame thugs that we have walking our streets daily.
PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING AND VOTE TO Help the community not harm it..
From: Nate Placencia
eyServicesComment
PR 72-202
Monday, August 5, 2024 5:47:12 PM P.H. Item #13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
1 write to you today regarding the proposed development project, DPR 72-2024. I recognize First and foremost, the current plans for DPR 72-2024 fail to provide sufficient parking. This deficiency will inevitably lead to increased congestion within our neighborhood streets, adversely affecting residents' quality of life and accessibility. It is essential to consider implementing a parking permit system to alleviate this potential problem.
Furthermore, the proposed development will prompte an increased use of our neighborhood as a shortcut, exacerbating traffic volumes and elevating the risk of accidents. This situation poses a significant threat to the safety of children and other vulnerable community members, as speeding vehicles become more prevalent. To address this issue, I propose the installation of a barrier at Grove and Dawnview to redirect traffic flow, coupled with the implementation of speed mitigation measures, such as electric traffic speed warning signs and speed humps.
Additionally, 1 am concerned about the environmental impact of increased traffic and construction in the area. The potential for noise pollution, air quality degradation, and harm to local wildlife habitats must be thoroughly assessed and mitigated.
Turge you to carefully reconsider the current development plan for DPR 72-2024, taking into account these concerns. It is crucial that we strive for a balanced approach that addresses the housing shortage while preserving the safety and integrity of our community. I am confident hat, with thoughtful planning and community engagement, we can achieve a solution tha enefits all stakeholders
Thank you for considering my input on this matter: 1 look forward to your response and to seeing proactive measures implemented to address these concerns.
Sincerely,
Dr. Nathan Placencia
371 Ivy Ct, Pomona, CA 91767
From: Michelle Young
TO: DeServicesComments
Subjecti CC Public Comment 8-05-2024
Date: Monday, August 5, 2024 6:24:15 PM P. H. Item #13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
We request approval for the blockade at Grove/Thompson Creek Wash, add speed bumps on the streets to slow down traffic and establish permitted parking.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Young
Michelle Young
From: Brittanie Conaway
To: DevServicesComments
Subjecti North Pomona Development Comments
Date: Monday, August 5, 2024 6:31:17 PM P. H. Item #13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I am writing to express my profound disappointment and frustration regarding the recent approval of the Four-story apartment complex on the corner of Garey Avenue and Dawnview Avenue. It is deeply concerning that the City did not conduct thorough traffic studies, impact assessments or parking evaluations before making this decision to approve the apartment complex plans.
The lack of due diligence in assessing the potential consequences for existing homeowners in the area is not only disrespectful but also a dereliction of the responsibilities entrusted to you by the residents of Pomona. The anticipated increase in traffic and the strain on already limited parking resources pose significant safety risks and diminish the quality of life for those of us who have long called this neighborhood home.
Further, the introduction of such a large development without proper planning and consideration is likely to negatively impact property values in the area. Homeowners have invested significantly in their properties, and all the sudden influx of traffic and parking issues can lead to a decrease in the desirability and market values of our homes. This is an unacceptable outcome for residents who have worked hard to build and maintain their community.
It is disheartening to see that the voices and concerns of property owners were not adequately considered in this process, As elected officials, your primary duty is to serve and protect the interests of your constituents. By neglecting to address these critical issues, you have failed to uphold the trust placed in you by the community.
1 urge you to reconsider the approval of this project, as proposed, and to take Immediate action to conduct comprehensive traffic and parking assessments. It is imperative that the City priorities the well-being and safety of its residents over unchecked development Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to seeing meaningful steps taken to address these concerns, which in my opinion include a street blockade and permitted parking for the single-family home residents.
Sincerely,
Brittanie Conaway
348 Markway Lane
Pomona, CA 91767
Adam Verduge
DevSeryicesComments
Subject: CC Public Comme ts 8-05-2024
Date: Monday, August 5, 2024 9:09:50 PM P.H. Item *13
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders.
Hello,
1am writing to oppose the development on Garey Ave and Foothill blvd. This housing community will adversely affect traffic in the surrounding neighborhoods. Additionally, the overflow parking will undoubtedly spill onto the nearby streets. Lastly, should this project move forward, I would request a street blockade at Grove and the Thompson creek wash. -Adam
P.M. Item # 13
Fire Statistics for 2022 and 9 months of 2023. (Char Kane)
GOOD EVENING MY MAYOR AND FELLOW COUNSEL MEMBERS AND
STAFF. MY NAME IS CHARMAINE KANE AND I AM A 25 YEAR HOME OWNER THAT WILL BE IMPACTED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT.
I AM TENURED EMPLOYEE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES IN
MANAGEMENT.
I have done research on Fire Calls for the 3 ALS Stations and our 1 BLS station. Adding this 3 large development within a 2 mile radius is only going to impact our firefighter/paramedics more.
Please see the attached statistics that I received from the Los Angeles County EMS Agency on fire runs for Los Angeles County fire stations, 101, 182, 183 and 186.
EMS Incident Date From 01/01/2022 To 09/30/2023
Prov & Unit 2022 Jan-Sept 2023 Total
CF 101 6553 4988 11541
CF 182 5680 4067 _9747
CF 183 5928 4351 10279
EMS Incident Date From 01/01/2022 To 09/30/2023
Prov & Unit 2022 Jan-Sept 2023/ Total
CF 186 2207 1663 3870
During 2022 this was a time of Covid and the fire departments were transporting less patients, due to hospital volume.
Advanced Life Support stations - ALS
Station 101 - (2022) See above for yearly runs, this comes out to 546/month
Station 101 - (2023) Jan-September (only 9 months were available at the time of the request) This comes out to 554/month but this was not the total for the full year as stats were not available. An increase from previous year not including the additional 3 months in 2023.
Station 182 - (2022) See above for yearly total runs. Total 474/Month Station 182 - (2023) January-September (only 9 months were available at time of request) 452/month only showing 9 months
Statin 183 - (2022) See above for yearly total runs. Total 494/Month Station 182 - (2023) January - September (Only 9 months were available at time of request) 484/Month only. Showing 9 months
Basic Life Support station - BLS 1 engine station
Station 186 - (2022) See above for yearly total runs. Total 184/Month Station 186 - (2023) January - September (Only 9 months were available at time of request. 184/Month Showing only 9 months.
There is concern as what the numbers currently are for 2024, as numbers are yet not available. On Bonita and Garey the Gabriel's have a approximately 300 Units, On Bonita and Towne the new building has about the same as the Gabriel's. Now adding this new apartment complex with 298 units.
There should be a mitigation report on how this will impact our 3 ALS fire units, our 1 BLS unit. How will this impact Pomona Valley Hospital? What are the total number of patients being seen per year in the emergency Room? How many total admissions per year. Plus, Pomona is the only Trauma Center in this area. Next closets is Huntington Memorial in Pasadena or Los Angeles General in downtown LA.
Has anyone talked to the Battalion Chiefs on the effect on the Firefighter/Paramedics. What is the average time for a unit to respond? This is also impacted with all the wild fires, where the strike teams our out.
Has anyone talked with Richard Yokum the CEO for Pomona Valley on the impact of the hospital, nurses (as there is a nursing shortage), physicians.
Has the city talked about expansion of the fire department, as we closed fire station 181? Has there been talks of expanding Pomona Valley Hospital?
I think these areas of public safety should be evaluated prior to more high density housing being fast tracked. What about our shortage of police officers in Pomona? What will the response times be, as it is very difficult to get a police officer in North Pomona? This will further impact the safety of the residents.