City Council / Housing Authority
August 3, 2026

Indirect impacts include a variety of effects related to areas or habitats that are not directly removed by Project development, such as loss of foraging habitat, increased ambient noise, artificial light, introduced predators (e.g., domestic cats, dogs, and other non-native animals), competition with exotic plants and animals, increased human presence and associated disturbances (e.g., trash, green waste, physical intrusion). Indirect impacts may include long and/or short-term daily activities associated with Project build-out, such as increased traffic, permanent barriers or fences, buildings, exotic seed-bearing ornamental plantings, irrigated landscapes, and human presence, among others. These types of impacts are known as edge effects and over time, may result in some encroachment on native plants by exotic plants, altered behavioral wildlife patterns, reduced wildlife diversity, and decreased wildlife abundance in habitats adjacent to a given project site. Furthermore, as is the case with direct impacts, indirect impacts may also have intended or unintended positive effects for certain species.

The foreseeable potential for significant adverse effects, either directly or indirectly through habitat modification or conversion, on any special-status vegetation community, plant species or wildlife species, or that could occur as a result of the development of this Project is discussed within this section.

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
35 5.1 Project Impacts
This section provides definitions and discussion of the various Project-related impacts that are anticipated to occur.

5.1.1 Habitat Impacts
Construction of the proposed Project will result in permanent impacts associated with the construction of a new pedestrian and bikeway along San Jose Creek. Permanent impacts to disturbed habitat and already developed land will result from installing new asphalt pavement and/or concrete sidewalks along the length of the project, removing existing fence lines, installing road ramps and other upgrades to associated public streets. Planting of landscaped trees and shrubs will also occur within disturbed and previously developed areas of the Project site. During construction, approximately 600 square feet (sq ft) of temporary impacts are proposed within the concrete channel for a dry dock installation. No sensitive habitat impacts are anticipated as a result of Project activities. Therefore, no habitat mitigation is required for habitat loss.

Several coast live oak trees will be removed or otherwise impacted through trimming and/or digging within the drip line of the oaks. Since these oak trees occur on LACFCD or City property, they are exempt from the City of Pomona Tree Preservation Ordinance permit requirements and mitigation.

The estimated acreages of proposed impacts resulting from construction are provided in Table 1. These impacts would include permanent impacts to 4.41 acres of Disturbed Habitat and 1.03 acres of Urban/Developed land, and 600 sq ft temporary impacts to non-vegetated floodplain or channel. None of the habitats that would be impacted by the Project are considered sensitive natural communities by CDFW or USFWS.

5.1.2 Species Impacts
Short-term (Temporary) Construction-Related Direct & Indirect Impacts Absent Mitigation measures recommended in Section 6, potential short-term direct impacts to specialstatus biological resources may occur as a result of construction of the proposed Project. These impacts could include wildlife entrapment, killed or injured wildlife, and unauthorized grading or vegetation removal. These activities have the potential to occur for any number of reasons, including lack or absence of Project design staking, inadequate or unmaintained demarcation of proposed impacts areas, misinterpretation of Project designs, and human error in operating equipment. Dependent on construction methodology, impacts resulting from wildlife entrapment may occur within Project limits where excavations remain open and un-sealed for extended periods. Wildlife injuries and mortalities have the potential to occur as a result of any of the previously discussed reasons but are also an inherent risk when working in proximity to undisturbed areas during activities such as initial vegetation clearing and ground disturbance.

The Survey Area provides suitable nesting habitat for a variety of native avian species associated with Disturbed Habitat and landscaped/ornamental vegetation associated with Urban/Developed habitat.

Suitable nesting habitat for raptor species identified during the survey consisted of moderate to tall San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
36 native and ornamental trees surrounding the project vicinity. Landscaped/ornamental vegetation and non-native and/or ruderal vegetation associated with disturbed areas within the Project limits and Survey Buffer also provides suitable habitat for ground nesting birds and those that nest in shrubs or trees, as well as nectaring sources for Crotch’s bumblebee or monarch butterfly. Implementation of the proposed Project has the potential to indirectly or directly impact nesting birds if active nests are present within the Project limits and vicinity during construction. The proposed Project also has the potential to directly or indirectly impact Crotch’s bumblebee or monarch butterfly through direct take of the species and/or destruction of nectar sources. The Survey Area also includes suitable roosting habitat for several bat species within infrastructure, including freeway overpasses and buildings, as well as ornamental trees, including palms. Impacts to these roosting structures are not anticipated as a result of the Project.

Potential indirect impacts as a result of construction of the proposed Project also include non-stormwater discharges resulting from spills or leaks, attracting predators, stormwater discharges, dust, noise and lighting. Operations and maintenance are a component of the Project, including long-term landscape maintenance and as-needed maintenance of the bikeway. No temporary laydown areas are proposed for the project, though 600 sq ft of temporary impacts to the concrete-lined channel are anticipated. Without implementation of mitigation measures, impacts as a result of the proposed Project could include non-stormwater discharges resulting from spills or leaks and stormwater discharges from sediment laden runoff into adjacent water systems. Without proper implementation of a best management practices and/or a SWPPP there may be a potential for short-term urban discharge. These impacts are considered to be less than significant by implementation of recommended mitigation measures outlined in Section 7 and with implementation of requirements of the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan.

Direct impacts to special-status wildlife species and migratory birds may occur as a result of direct impacts to individuals, including individuals, nests or roosts, which may occur during vegetation, soil and debris removal. Absent mitigation, Project-related impacts to special-status species and migratory birds is potentially significant.

Direct, short-term impacts are anticipated to occur to potentially jurisdictional waters during the temporary installation of a dry dock during construction at the inlet to the concrete-lined channel. San Jose Creek is likely subject to regulation by USACE, Los Angeles RWQCB and/or CDFW and therefore temporary impacts may require a 401, 404, 408 and/or 1602 permit. Since only a small area of temporary impacts to the concrete-lined channel is proposed and with the implementation of required permits, substantial adverse direct and indirect impacts are not anticipated to occur.

Long-term (Permanent) Direct Impacts
Direct impacts associated with the long-term development of the Project would be entirely within existing disturbed habitat or previously developed areas. There is no anticipated loss of native habitat, therefore, no mitigation or restoration is required. Since 100 percent of the Project’s permanent impacts will be to disturbed habitat or urban/developed areas, long term impacts are not anticipated.

Furthermore, the Project is mostly surrounded by urban/developed areas or agricultural land and therefore does not pose a significant impact to the ecological balance of the region The Project will result in a loss of two oak trees and trimming of several additional oak trees. Since these San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
37 oak trees occur on LACFCD or City property, they are exempt from the Pomona Tree Ordinance permit requirements and mitigation. The loss of these individuals is not considered to have significant adverse permanent impacts.

Long-term (Permanent) Indirect Impacts
Potential for impacts to species occupying adjacent urban/developed habitat from increased noise and light associated the proposed permanent structures is not anticipated. Noise and light levels are expected to be consistent with ambient levels that currently exist along the San Jose Creek currently.

Considering these factors, it is fair to presume that any native wildlife species occupying adjacent lands have become accustomed to a similar level of anthropogenic disturbance and therefore these impacts are not considered to be significant.

Other long-term indirect impacts as result of the proposed Project could include stormwater discharges from sediment laden runoff into municipal storm drain systems. Without proper stormwater management systems incorporated in the construction design, consistent with state and local requirements, there is a potential for long term urban discharge. The Project construction design includes permanent on-site stormwater management systems and therefore long-term indirect impacts from stormwater discharge are considered less than significant.

5.2 CEQA Thresholds of Significance
This section is divided into sub-sections that include direct and indirect impacts analysis for each threshold under CEQA.

5.2.1 CEQA Threshold Biological Resources- Special-Status Species a). Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS?
The proposed Project has the potential for indirect and direct impacts to special-status wildlife species detailed in Table 3. The biological resource assessment determined that absent mitigation measures outlined in Section 6 below, there is potential for direct and indirect impacts to special-status wildlife species and their associated habitats.

The biological resource assessment evaluated the Project area and Survey Buffer for sensitive wildlife documented to occur within the vicinity and determined that seven special-status wildlife species have a low to moderate potential to occur (Table 3). Additionally, there is potential for migratory birds to occur within the Project area, which are considered a protected wildlife species.

The biological resource assessment determined that two oak trees, which are considered sensitive under The City of Pomona Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance, occur within the Project limits and will require removal, while several others will require trimming. Since these oak trees occur on LACFCD or City property, the Project is exempt from permit and mitigation requirements. The assessment determined that there is no potential for any other special-status plant species to occur within the Project limits and San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
38 Survey Buffer.

Biological Resources Impact 1 – Temporary Indirect Impacts to Special-Status Species and Migratory Birds
Special-Status Plants
The biological resource assessment determined that several oak trees, which are considered sensitive under The City of Pomona Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance, occur within the Survey Area and will require removal and/or trimming, though temporary indirect impacts are not anticipated. The assessment also determined that there is no potential for any other special-status plant species to occur within the Project limits and Survey Buffer, therefore temporary indirect impacts to any special-status plant species are not anticipated as a result of Project implementation.

Special-Status Wildlife
Seven special-status wildlife species were determined to have low to moderate potential to occur within the Project limits and Survey Buffer. Pallid bat and pocketed free-tailed bat were determined to have low potential for occurrence due to the presence of bridges and buildings within the Project limits and Survey Buffer, providing marginally suitable roosting habitat. Monarch butterfly has a low potential to forage on flowering plants within and adjacent to the Project area and Survey Buffer, but the Project area and Survey Buffer lack the breeding host plant and is outside the known overwintering roost sites for this species. Crotch’s bumblebee has a low potential to occur due to the presence of flowering nonnatives associated with disturbed habitat and landscaped/ornamental areas, which provide moderately suitable nectar sources for this species. Southern California legless lizard was determined to have moderate potential for occurrence due to the presence of suitable suburban gardens within the Survey Buffer. Western yellow bat has a moderate potential to occur due to the presence of palm trees throughout the Project area and Survey Buffer that provide suitable roosting habitat. Lastly, yellow warbler has a moderate potential to occur in the shrubby thickets along portions of the flood control channel. All other special-status species evaluated for the Project are presumed absent. There were no narrow endemic, federal or state-listed wildlife species observed within the Project area and Survey Buffer. No other special-status species were identified as potentially present on the Project site. For the purposes of CEQA, species determined to have low potential or to be absent from the site do not require further study or mitigation.

Temporary indirect impacts to special-status wildlife species and birds protected under the MBTA that were determined to have potential for occurrence within the Study area (Table 3) may occur as a result of increased noise, lighting, construction dust, increased predator pressure, and loss of foraging habitat.

Furthermore, several special status wildlife species, known to occur within the region, could occupy areas beyond the Study Area. Therefore, temporary indirect impacts to special-status wildlife species may result in stormwater discharges of sediment laden water to downstream drainages that has the potential to modify and/or degrade downstream special-status wildlife habitat located outside of the Project limits and Study Area. Other potential indirect impacts as a result of Project implementation may also include non-stormwater discharges resulting from spills or leaks that could pollute adjacent habitat. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-2 and BIO-3 discussed in Section 6 and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), dust control measures, and best maintenance practices required under the Project’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
39 (NPDES) permit, potential long-term indirect impacts to special-status species listed above would be reduced to less than significant. Therefore, temporary indirect impacts to special-status wildlife species would be less than significant.

Biological Resources Impact 2 – Temporary Direct Impacts to Special-Status Species and Migratory Birds
Special-Status Plants
The biological resource assessment determined that several oak trees, which are considered sensitive under The City of Pomona Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance, will require trimming. Since these oak trees occur on LACFCD or City property, the Project is exempt from permit and mitigation requirements. It is suggested that proper trimming techniques that follow the ANSI A300 standards are followed to ensure temporary direct impacts to these oaks are less than significant. The assessment determined that there is no potential for any other special-status plant species to occur within the Project area and Survey Buffer, therefore temporary direct impacts to additional special-status plant species are not anticipated as a result of Project implementation.

Special-Status Wildlife
Direct impacts to southern California legless lizard, western yellow bat, Crotch’s bumblebee, monarch butterfly, yellow warbler, and migratory birds may occur as a result of direct impacts to individuals, nests or roosts, which may occur during vegetation, tree, soil and debris removal or trimming. Absent mitigation measures, Project-related impacts to southern California legless lizard, western yellow bat, Crotch’s bumblebee, monarch butterfly, yellow warbler, and migratory birds are potentially significant; however, with implementation of BIO-, BIO-2, and BIO-3 impacts are likely to be less than significant.

Biological Resources Impact 3 – Long-Term Indirect Impacts to Special-Status Species and Habitats Special-Status Plants
Long-term indirect impacts from removal and/or trimming of oaks within the Survey Area are not anticipated to be significant. Given that the Project area does not contain any additional special-status plant species, Project implementation will not result in the loss of any portion of a special-status plant population, thereby preventing any potential indirect impact to range wide plant populations.

Therefore, long-term indirect impacts to special-status plant species are not anticipated.

Special-Status Wildlife
Potential for long-term indirect impacts to species occupying adjacent habitat from increased noise and light associated with Project construction is not anticipated. Once the proposed bike path is constructed, noise and light levels are expected to be consistent with ambient levels that currently exist in the Project area. Considering these factors, it is fair to presume that any native wildlife species, including special-status species, occupying adjacent lands have become accustomed to a similar level of anthropogenic disturbance and therefore these impacts are not considered to be significant.

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
40 5.2.2 CEQA Threshold Biological Resources- Sensitive Natural Communities b). Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS? Biological Resources Impact 4 - Temporary Impacts to Sensitive Natural Communities Section 5.1.2 details temporary and permanent impacts to natural vegetation communities. None of the vegetation communities identified within the Project impact limits are considered sensitive by CDFW or USFWS.

The estimated acreages of proposed impacts resulting from construction are provided in Table 2. No sensitive natural communities occur within the Project limits or the Survey Area, therefore the Project would not result in significant impacts.

Biological Resources Impact 5 - Permanent Impacts to Sensitive Natural Communities The Project would result in permanent impacts to 4.41 acres of Disturbed Habitat and 1.03 acres of Urban/Developed land. Since no sensitive natural communities occur within the Survey Area, the Project would not result in significant impacts.

Biological Resources Impact 6 - Indirect Impacts to Riparian and Wetland Communities No riparian or wetland communities occur within the Survey Area, however, there is the potential for indirect impacts to occur to downstream wetlands from sedimentation and/or pollution entering the canal. However, with implementation of the NPDES permit requirements, impacts are considered less than significant.

Biological Resources Impact 7 – Direct Impacts to Riparian and Wetland Communities No riparian or wetland communities occur within the Survey Area. Therefore, no significant direct impacts are expected to occur.

5.2.3 CEQA Threshold Biological Resources- Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? A concrete-lined portion of San Jose Creek flows adjacent to the Project’s permanent impact areas, with only a small area (600 sq ft) of temporary impacts anticipated within the concrete channel. San Jose Creek is likely subject to regulation by USACE, Los Angeles RWQCB and/or CDFW and therefore temporary impacts may require a 401, 404, 408 and/or 1602 permit. Since only a small area of temporary impacts to potential jurisdictional waters or wetlands are proposed, substantial adverse effects are not anticipated to occur.

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
41 5.2.4 CEQA Threshold Biological Resources- Wildlife Movement d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Wildlife corridors are linear features that function to connect at least two significant habitat areas or larger core areas. Wildlife corridors typically apply to mammals and reptiles, as aquatic wildlife generally rely on waterways for dispersal and avian species are able to fly between habitat patches by crossing developed areas. The Project is located within a region that is largely surrounded by the urban development of Pomona. Although San Jose Creek is present within the Survey Area, the canal has been concrete-lined and altered. Flowing water to support movement of aquatic species was not observed during the biological resources assessment, however, during times of seasonal flow the canal could provide movement of aquatic species. The project will not impede, restrict or modify channel flows and, therefore, impacts to aquatic species corridors are not expected. Given the urban nature of the Project site and surrounding area, short- and long-term impacts to wildlife movement are not expected.

5.2.5 CEQA Threshold Biological Resources- Local Policies and Ordinances e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The City of Pomona’s Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance (Section .5809-23 of the Municipal Code) mandates the protection of all healthy, mature oak trees that are larger than eight inches in diameter.

Several coast live oak trees are present within the Survey Area; two are anticipated to be removed within the Project limits and several others located within the Survey Buffer will be impacted through trimming and/or digging within the oak’s drip line. Since all oak trees within the Survey Area fall on LACFCD or City property, the Project is exempt from the City of Pomona Oak Tree Preservation permit requirements and mitigation.

The Project does not fall within any SEAs.

5.2.6 CEQA Threshold Biological Resources- Conservation Plans f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or state HCP?
The Project does not fall within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or state HCP.

Therefore, no impacts are anticipated.

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
42 6.0 MITIGATION PROGRAM

6.1 Mitigation Measures for Construction Impacts
BIO-1: Delineation of Project limits
The boundaries of proposed Project limits will be clearly delineated with stakes, fencing or other conspicuous boundary markings, which will be maintained until the completion of construction activities, to prevent the unauthorized impact of habitat outside of the Project limits discussed in this report. All employees shall be instructed that their activities, vehicles, equipment and construction materials are restricted to the proposed Project footprint.

BIO-2: Conduct Vegetation Clearing/Initial Grading Outside of the Bird Nesting Season OR Conduct Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Surveys
To avoid impacts to nesting birds, special status birds and/or raptors the following will be implemented:
● Conduct vegetation removal and initial ground disturbance activities outside of the bird breeding season (February 15 – September 15).
● If vegetation removal or initial grading occurs during the breeding season, nesting bird surveys will be conducted by a qualified biologist for nesting raptors and migratory birds within the Project area plus an additional 100-foot survey buffer (for passerines) and 300-foot buffer (for raptors) within 3 days of construction. If nests of listed birds, migratory birds, raptors, or other sensitive species are documented, active nests will be avoided, and a nest buffer will be designated around each nest. Nest buffers will be determined at the discretion of the qualified biologist based on the location and species occupying the nest. Species that are not covered by the MBTA (such as European starling, house sparrow, Eurasian collared dove, etc.) will not require a nest buffer. The perimeter of this nest buffer will be clearly demarcated, and all construction activities will be prohibited within the delineated area until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest has either successfully fledged, been depredated, or failed due to other causes.

Construction activities may proceed within the non-disturbance buffer if a qualified biologist is present to monitor active nests and determines that construction activities are not causing indirect or direct disturbance to a nest.

BIO-3: Biological Monitoring During Vegetation Clearing To avoid impacts to special status species, a biologist (biological monitor) experienced with identification of the sensitive and common biological resources in the region shall be present to monitor all vegetation clearing activities, regardless of the time of year such activities are scheduled to begin.

The biological monitor shall perform biological clearance sweeps at the start of each workday that vegetation clearing activities take place. The biological monitor shall be present on a full-time basis during the vegetation-clearing activities to ensure the activities do not affect sensitive biological resources and to move or redirect wildlife out of harm’s way as necessary. The monitor will be responsible for communicating regularly with the Project Proponent and onsite contractor on noncompliance issues and ways to ensure that impacts to sensitive biological resources will be avoided to the fullest extent possible in accordance with the appropriate Project agreements and permits, as San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
43 applicable. Biological monitoring shall take place until the Proposed Project area has been completely cleared of any vegetation. The biological monitor shall keep a record of monitoring activities in a log that contains representative photographs of the work activities monitored and any sensitive biological resources incidentally encountered during Project activities.

7.0 CONCLUSION
Seven special-status wildlife species were determined to have low to moderate potential to occur within the Project limits and Survey Buffer: pallid bat, pocketed free-tailed bat, monarch butterfly, Crotch’s bumblebee, southern California legless lizard, western yellow bat, and yellow warbler. No special-status species were observed within the Project limits and Survey Buffer.

Of the 11 special-status plant specifies identified during the literature review, all were determined to be absent based on lack of suitable habitat and substrates within the Project limits and Survey Buffer. Coast live oaks, which are considered sensitive under the City of Pomona Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance, occur on-site, however, the oaks occur on LACFCD or City property and are therefore exempt from permit and mitigation requires for oak tree impacts.

Absent recommended mitigation measures outlined herein, the proposed Project impacts have the potential to be significant on special-status wildlife species and jurisdictional resources.

To the maximum extent practicable, avoidance of impacts to special-status species and nesting birds/raptors will be achieved per the MBTA, FESA, and CESA. Indirect effects to biological resources during and following construction are anticipated to be less than significant due to proposed minimization measures. Significant impacts to wildlife corridors are not anticipated as a result of the proposed Project. Additionally, cumulative impacts are anticipated to be less than significant due to the limited extent of disturbance.

Temporary impacts proposed to the concrete-line channel is likely subject to regulation by USACE, Los Angeles RWQCB and/or CDFW and therefore the Project may require a 401, 404, 408 and/or 1602 permit.

Since only a small area of temporary impacts to potential jurisdictional waters or wetlands are proposed, substantial adverse effects are not anticipated to occur.

Proposed mitigation will include implementation of mitigation measures which include delineation of Project limits, conducting vegetation clearing and initial ground disturbance outside of the bird nesting season if feasible, conducting pre-construction nesting bird surveys if construction occurs during the breeding season, and conducting biological monitoring during vegetation trimming/removal.

By adhering to the mitigation measures proposed herein, no direct or indirect adverse impacts would occur to the Project site or any threatened, endangered, or otherwise special-status plant or wildlife species. Additionally, no cumulative impacts are expected to occur. Every effort to avoid impacting special-status species and nesting birds and raptors will be implemented, including compliance with the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code Sections of the 3500 series.

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
44 I hereby certify that the statements furnished above present the data and information required for this biological survey results report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Hayley Milner
Staff Biologist
San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
45 8.0 REFERENCES
Baldwin, B. G., D. H. Goldman, D. J. Keil, R. Patterson, T. J. Rosatti, and D. H. Wilken, editors 2012 The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

Calflora
2022 Information on California plants for education, research and conservation. [web application].

Berkeley, California: The Calflora Database [a non-profit organization]. Available:
http://www.calflora.org/.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
2008 CEQA Guidelines. Statutes and Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act as amended.
2024 California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). RareFind Version 3.1.0. Database Query for the San Dinmas, California, USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle. Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch. Accessed February 2024.

California Native Plant Society (CNPS)
2024 Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-02). California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. Accessed June 2020 from: http://www.cnps.org/inventory.

City of Pomona
2014 City of Pomona: Pomona General Plan Update, Corridors Specific Plan, Active Transportation Plan and Green Plan. Volume I: Final Environmental Impact Report. Accessed February 2024.

Holland, Robert F.
1986 Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. State of California, the Resources Agency. Department of Fish and Game.

Oberbauer, T., Kelly, M. and J. Buegge
2008 Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County. Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.” Holland.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
2025 National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Critical Habitat Mapper. https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=68d8df16b39c48fe9f60640692d0 e318. Accessed January 2025.

Peterson, R. T., DiGiorgio, M., & Peterson, R. T.
2010 Peterson field guide to birds of Western North America.

Sawyer, J.O., T. Keeler-Wolf, J.M. Evens
San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway – Biological Letter Report City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
46 2009 A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition. California Native Plant Society.

Sacramento, California.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Environmental Laboratory U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y87-1. Vicksburg, Mississippi. 2008 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0), ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-28.

Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA))
2011 Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.

Accessed February 2024.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
2024a Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC). https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov. 2016 U.S. FWS Threatened & Endangered Species Active Critical Habitat Report. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/table/critical-habitat.html. Accessed February 2024. 2024b National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/.

United States Geological Survey (USGS)
2011 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map for San Dimas, California. 2024 National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). https://www.usgs.gov/national-hydrography/nationalhydrography-dataset.

ATTACHMENT A
Figures
a
Entrada
as
Ave
ra Landfill
losed)
10 10
10 10
S Campus Dr
Via Verde
W 2nd St
Pomona Blvd
W Orange Grove Ave
N
Dudley
St
Gle
n
Ave
Club Dr
Ragi
Fairplex
Dr
W Holt Ave
Valley Blvd
Corona Fwy
Pomona Water
Reclamation
Plant
Ganesha High
School
Los Felis Dr
W 9th St
Wright St
Storrs Pl
State St
W Temple Ave
Valley
Blvd
W
Mission
Blvd
Corona Fwy
Lanterman
Laurel Ave
W 2nd St
W 1st St
Weber St
W 4th
W Orange Grove Ave
W
W Mo
W 3rd St
N
White
Ave
W Holt Ave
W Mission Blvd
Ganesha Park
W 9th St
W
aters A ve
S
White Ave
Chino Valley F
Palm Lake Golf
Course
Kern County
Los Angeles
County
Orange
County
Riverside
County
San
Bernardino
County
San Diego
County
Ventura
County
Figure 1
Project Vicinity and Location
San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project
¯
0 2,000
Feet
Legend
Survey Area
nida
Entrada
S
San Dim
as
Ave
ra Landfill
losed)
P
San Dimas
Brackett Field
Puddingstone
Reservoir
10 10
10 10
S Campus Dr
Via Verde
W 2nd St
Pomona Blvd
W Orange Grove Ave
N
Dudley
St
Gle
n
Ave
Club Dr
Raging
Wat e rs
Dr
Fairplex
Dr
W Holt Ave
Valley Blvd
Corona Fwy
Pomona Water
Reclamation
Plant
Mountan
Meadows
Frank G Bonelli Country Club
Regional Park
Ganesha High
School
s
Dr
Decorah Rd
Sunset Crossing Rd
Los Felis Dr
State St
W 9th St
Wright St
Storrs Pl
Flintlock Rd
W Temple Ave
Valley
Blvd
W
Mission
Blvd
Corona Fwy
Country
Crossing Park
Lanterman
Developmental
Center
(Formerly)
N
White
A
W A
Laurel Ave
W 2nd St
W 1st St
Weber St
W 4th
W Orange Grove Ave
W
W Mo
W 3rd St
Yorba
N
White
Ave
W Holt Ave
W Mission Blvd
Fairplex
Ganesha Park
Village Lo
o
p
Rd
W 9th St
W
Waters A ve
S
White Ave
Chino Valley Fwy
Coro
Palm Lake Golf
Course
Figure 2
Soils
City of Pomona SJC Bikeway
¯
0 2,000
Feet
Legend
Survey Area
Soil Mapunit Name
Counterfeit-Urban land complex,
10 to 35 percent slopes, terraced
Dumps
Gaviota-Chumash-Rock outcrop
complex, 20 to 55 percent slopes
Lithic Haploxerolls-Lithic Argixerolls
complex, 20 to 55 percent slopes
Soper-Pachic Haploxerolls-Boades
complex, 25 to 75 percent slopes
Urban land, frequently flooded, 0
to 5 percent slopes
Urban land-Azuvina-Montebello
complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Urban land-Biscailuz-Pico complex,
0 to 2 percent slopes
Urban land-Palmview-Tujunga
complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Urban land-Pico-Metz complex, 0
to 2 percent slopes
Urban land-Sorrento-Arbolado
complex, 2 to 9 percent slopes
Water
Zaca-Apollo, warm complex, 20 to
55 percent slopes
W Covina Blvd
Bonita Ave
s St
W Arrow Hwy
Arrow Hwy
Brackett Field
San Dimas
57 60
60 10
10 10
Valley Blvd
Valley Blvd
W
Mission Blvd
Grand Ave
Fairple x
Dr
Via Verde
Corona Fwy
Via Verde
Country Club
Mountan
Meadows
Country Club
t City
land
Frank G Bonelli
Regional Park
Country
Crossing Park
Mount San
Antonio
Community
College
Diamond Ranch
High School
California
Polytechnic
University
Pomona
Lanterman
Developmental
Center
(Formerly)
Walnut
Diamond Bar
Golf Course
66 N Towne Ave
N Garey Ave
N
White
Ave
La Verne
10 N White Ave
S Towne Ave
N
Garey Ave
S
Garey Ave
E H
S
White Ave
W Holt Ave
Corona Fwy
W Mission Blvd Pomon E Missi a
Chino Ave
Chino Creek
Watershed
Walnut Creek
Watershed
Lower San
Gabriel River
Watershed
San Jose
Creek
Watershed
Figure 3
Hydrology
City of Pomona SJC Bikeway
¯
0 4,000
Feet
Legend
Survey Area
Watershed
NHD
Lakes, Ponds, Reservoirs, and
Estuaries
Areas Subject to Flooding
Flowlines
NWI
Palustrine
Riverine
Lacustrine
Morris
Reservoir
Glendora
Wilderness Park
57 60
60 60
39 8
210 210
10 10
Brodiaea
Reserve
Walnut City
Parkland
Woodside
Village Open
Space
Frank G Bonelli
Regional Park
South Hills Park
California
Polytechnic
University
Pomona
Charter Oak
Azusa
Walnut
San Dimas
Citrus
Glendora
Covina
60 60
60 60
57 57
57 142
Black Gold Golf
Firestone Boy
Scout
Reservation
Rowland
Heights
Brea
South San
Jose Hills
Diamond Bar
60 60
66 66
210 210
210
10 10
Marshall
Canyon
Conservation
Corridor
Claremont Hills
Wilderness Park
Marshall
Elementary
School
Sa
H
Montclair
La Verne
Claremont
Pomona
71 142
Vellano Country
Club El
Water Canyon
Natural
Preserve
Chino Hills
Chino
Laterallus
jamaicensis
coturniculus
Aquila
chrysaetos
Taricha
torosa Taricha
torosa
Thamnophis
hammondii
Pseudognaphalium
leucocephalum
Arizona
elegans
occidentalis
Spea
hammondii
Phrynosoma
blainvillii
Symphyotrichum
defoliatum
Lasiurus
xanthinus
Polioptila
californica californica
Bombus
crotchii
Lasiurus
cinereus
Eumops perotis
californicus
Eumops perotis
californicus
Bombus
pensylvanicus
Taxidea taxus
Nyctinomops
femorosaccus
Antrozous
pallidus
Thysanocarpus
rigidus
Bombus
crotchii
Bombus
pensylvanicus
Bombus
pensylvanicus
Polioptila
californica
californica
Gonidea
angulata
Calochortus
plummerae
Diplectrona californica
Neolarra alba
Bombus
pensylvanicus
Sidalcea
neomexicana
Sidalcea
neomexicana
Buteo
swainsoni
Bombus
pensylvanicus
Symphyotrichum
defoliatum
Lepidium
virginicum var.
robinsonii
Riversidian
Alluvial Fan
Sage Scrub
Horkelia
cuneata var.
puberula
Dudleya
multicaulis
Lasiurus
cinereus
Anniella
stebbinsi
Polioptila californica
californica
Southern Sycamore
Alder Riparian
Woodland
Anniella
stebbinsi
Anniella
stebbinsi
Riversidian
Alluvial Fan
Sage Scrub
Calochortus
plummerae
Falco
columbarius
Falco
columbarius
Falco
columbarius
California
Walnut
Woodland
California
Walnut Woodland
California Walnut
Woodland
California
Walnut Woodland
Polioptila
californica
californica
Eumops perotis
californicus
California
Walnut
Woodland
Southern Coast
Live Oak
Riparian Forest
Polioptila californica
californica
Southern Coast Live
Oak Riparian Forest
Southern
Coast Live Oak
Riparian Forest
California
Walnut
Woodland
Polioptila
californica
californica
Polioptila
californica
californica
Horkelia cuneata
var. puberula
Arizona
elegans
occidentalis
Taxidea
taxus
Lepidium virginicum
var.
robinsonii
Walnut
Forest
California
Walnut
Woodland
Agelaius tricolor
Lepidium
virginicum
var. robinsonii
Polioptila
californica californica
Polioptila californica
californica
California
Walnut
Woodland
California
Walnut Woodland
Setophaga petechia
Polioptila
californica
californica
Polioptila
californica californica
Walnut
Forest
Walnut
Forest
Walnut Forest
Southern Coast Live
Oak Riparian Forest
Polioptila
californica
californica
Crotalus ruber
Southern Coast Live Oak
Riparian Forest
California
Walnut
Woodland
Southern
Coast Live Oak
Riparian Forest
Southern Coast
Live Oak
Riparian Forest
Gila orcuttii
California Walnut
Woodland
Actinemys pallida
Dudleya
multicaulis
Dudleya
multicaulis
Dudleya
multicaulis
Calochortus
weedii var.
intermedius
Anniella stebbinsi
Polioptila
californica
californica
Dudleya
multicaulis
Polioptila
californica
californica
Polioptila
californica
californica
Polioptila californica
californica
Polioptila
californica
californica
Vireo bellii
pusillus
Vireo bellii
pusillus
Vireo bellii pusillus
Dudleya
multicaulis
Calochortus
plummerae
Dudleya multicaulis
Dudleya multicaulis
Setophaga
petechia
Anniella stebbinsi
Dudleya
multicaulis
Polioptila
californica
Polioptila californica
californica californica
Polioptila californica
californica
Polioptila
californica
californica
Polioptila
californica californica
Polioptila
californica
californica
Sagittaria
sanfordii
Bombus crotchii
Polioptila
californica
californica
Catostomus
santaanae
Polioptila californica
californica
Calochortus
weedii var.
intermedius
Thamnophis
hammondii
Horkelia cuneata var.
puberula
Dudleya multicaulis
Sagittaria
sanfordii
Figure 4
CNDDB Map
San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project
¯
0 2
Miles
Legend
Survey Area
Project 5-mile Buffer
CNDDB (August 2024)
Animals
Plants
W Covina Blvd
Bonita Ave
s St
W Arrow Hwy
Arrow Hwy
Brackett Field
San Dimas
57 60
60 10
10 10
Valley Blvd
Valley Blvd
W
Mission Blvd
Grand Ave
Fairple x
Dr
Via Verde
Corona Fwy
Via Verde
Country Club
Mountan
Meadows
Country Club
t City
land
Frank G Bonelli
Regional Park
Country
Crossing Park
Mount San
Antonio
Community
College
Diamond Ranch
High School
California
Polytechnic
University
Pomona
Lanterman
Developmental
Center
(Formerly)
Walnut
Diamond Bar
Golf Course
66 N Towne Ave
N Garey Ave
N
White
Ave
La Verne
10 N White Ave
S Towne Ave
N
Garey Ave
S
Garey Ave
E H
S
White Ave
W Holt Ave
Corona Fwy
W Mission Blvd Pomon E Missi a
Chino Ave
Figure 5
USFWS Critical Habitat
City of Pomona SJC Bikeway
¯
0 5,000
Feet
Legend
Survey Area
USFWS Critical Habitat
Coastal California gnatcatcher
ll
Collins St
Kellogg
Dr
Kellogg Dr
Kellogg Dr
S Campus
Dr
S
Campus
Dr
Thompson
Wash
Thompson
Wash
S
Campus
Dr
Innovation
Way
Poly
Vis
W Temple Ave
W Te
y
Blvd
Thompson
Wash
Kellogg Dr
S Campus
Dr
Lancer Av
Albona Pl
Red
Cro
Kellogg Dr
Un
V
i
alley
Blvd
V
Building 215:

Edison SCE2
1 2
Figure 6
Vegetation

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project
¯
0 300
Feet
Legend
Photo w/ Direction
Survey Area
Project Limits
Vegetation Community
Urban/Developed
Disturbed
Non-vegetated
Floodplain or Channel
10 E Campus Dr
42B
The Don Miller
and Ron
Simons Rose
Float Lab
Thompson Wash
S Campus Dr
Citrus Ln
lyptus Ln
E
Campus
Dr
Hennipen St
Kellogg
Polytechnic
Elementary
School
Dr
M
57 57
Thompson Wash
57 57
S Campus Dr
E
Campus
Dr
Hennipen St
Kellogg Park Dr
Nicholet St
Omar
d
3 4
Figure 6
Vegetation

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project
¯
0 300
Feet
Legend
Photo w/ Direction
Survey Area
Project Limits
Vegetation Community
Urban/Developed
Disturbed
Non-vegetated
Floodplain or Channel
na Fwy
S Campus Dr
C
orporate
Center Dr
Corona Fwy
S Campus Dr
Valley Blvd
d Ave
Kellogg Park Dr
Gretche
Valley Blvd
Belin
S Campus
Dr
Corporate Center Dr
Ridgeway St
Ridgeway St
Kellogg Park Dr
Cornelia St
Belinda Ave
Carlton Ave
Aldis
Pl
Corona Fwy
Corona Fwy
Thompson Wash
Lombard
St
Barjud Ave
Barjud Ave
Lyndale Ave
Dupont
St
Kellogg Park Dr
Randy St
Cathy Ave
Aston Ave
Valley Blvd
Valley Blvd
9 5
6 7
8 10
Figure 6
Vegetation

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project
¯
0 300
Feet
Legend
Photo w/ Direction
Survey Area
Project Limits
Vegetation Community
Urban/Developed
Disturbed
Non-vegetated
Floodplain or Channel
usta
St
on Ave
Ri
N
Augusta
St
Cromwell St
Canterbury Ave
Academy Ave
Concord Ave
Avalon Ave
Belinda Ave
Carlton Ave
Ganesha High
School
Thompson Wash
Thompson Wash
W Orange Grove Ave
N
Augusta
St
Laurel Ave
Kellogg Park Dr
Arroyo Dr
Canterbury Ave
Corona Fwy
14A
Avalon Ave
Fairplex
Dr airplex
Dr
Thompson Wash
W Orange Grove Ave
Laurel Ave
Gleneagles A
ve
Kellogg Park Dr
Arroyo Dr
Lilac
Pl
Corona Fwy
14 13
11 12
Figure 6
Vegetation

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project
¯
0 300
Feet
Legend
Photo w/ Direction
Survey Area
Project Limits
Vegetation Community
Urban/Developed
Disturbed
Non-vegetated
Floodplain or Channel
Terrace Ln
Elwood St
Glenpark St
N
ewm
a
n
or Ave
Greenacre Rd
b
Dr
Glen Ave
Fairplex
Dr
rplex
Dr
Kellogg Park
Arroyo Ave
Arthur Ave
Gilbe
Fairplex
Dr
Marshall (John)
Middle School
Resort L
n
Winn Ct
e
L
n
Thompson Wash
Gle
n
Ave
Gle
n
Ave
C
a
m
brin
Rd
Elwood St
Elwood St
L
Surrey Ln
Glenpark St
Pavilion Dr
Arroyo
Elementary
School
W Orange Grove Ave
Gle
n
Ave
Arroyo Ave
Prock
St
S
a
ed
St
15 Figure 6
Vegetation

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project
¯
0 300
Feet
Legend
Photo w/ Direction
Survey Area
Project Limits
Vegetation Community
Urban/Developed
Disturbed
Non-vegetated
Floodplain or Channel
10 C
a
m
brin
Rd
C
a
m
brin
Rd
od St
La Vita Ave
N
Du
Win
gate
Pl
We
b
er St
Murchison Ave
Jacqueline Dr
Cirrus C
T
t
hu
n
der Ct
Cortez
Elementary
School
44 Thompson Wash
Ashport St
Arroyo Ave
Weber
St
Tyleen
Pl
N
D
udley
St
Elwood St
Wingate Pl
W Orange Grove Ave
Ashport St
C
Claire
Pl
10 B
allerin
a
Pl
Pavilion
C
ath
edral Way
B
allerin
a
Pl
Weber St
We
W Or
Figure 6
Vegetation

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project
¯
0 300
Feet
Legend
Photo w/ Direction
Survey Area
Project Limits
Vegetation Community
Urban/Developed
Disturbed
Non-vegetated
Floodplain or Channel
10 Val Vista St
Murchison Ave
Cleveland St
Clevelan
Dr
Douglass Dr
Thompson Wash
Ashport St
vilion Dr
Pavilion Dr
L
ewis
St
Groff St
G
othic
Way
C
orinthia
n
Way
W Orange Grove Ave
Bre
o
n
St
Weber Street
Park
W Orange Grove Ave
Thompson Wash
Val Vista St
V
Casa
Vista
Dr Murchison Ave
California
Pl
Novell St
Altura Ct
W Orange Grove Ave
Casa
Vista
Dr
Casa
Hermosa
Dr
Groff St
W Wilson St
16 Figure 6
Vegetation

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project
¯
0 300
Feet
Legend
Photo w/ Direction
Survey Area
Project Limits
Vegetation Community
Urban/Developed
Disturbed
Non-vegetated
Floodplain or Channel

ATTACHMENT B
Photo Pages
San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project –Representative Photograph Pages City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, California
1 Photograph 1. East-facing view of the western Project limits along the San Jose Creek channel, consisting of disturbed habitat within the access road and further surrounded by developed areas, including landscaped/ornamental vegetation (Photo Point 1).

Photograph 2. North-facing view of the Project site consisting of disturbed habitat along the northern access road, bordered by landscaped California sycamores (Platanus racemosa) along S Campus Drive (Photo Point 2).

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project –Representative Photograph Pages City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, California
2 Photograph 3. Southwest-facing view of Kellogg Park bordering the south side of the San Jose Creek channel, located within the Survey Area (Photo Point 3).

Photograph 4. Northwest-facing view of the Project site, situated along the northern access road (left side of photo), located within the SR-57 underpass and consisting of disturbed habitat and bordered by landscaped/ornamental vegetation (Photo Point 4).

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project –Representative Photograph Pages City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, California
3 Photograph 5. South-facing view of two coast live oaks (Quercus agrifolia) approximately 10 feet northwest of the Project site (Photo Point 5).

Photograph 6. Southeast-facing view of a coast live oak (orange arrow) approximately 13 feet northwest of the Project site (Photo Point 6).

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project –Representative Photograph Pages City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, California
4 Photograph 7. Southwest-facing view of a coast live oak along the northern boundary of the Project (Photo Point 7).

Photograph 8. Southwest-facing view of a coast live oak approximately 5 feet northwest of the Project boundary (Photo Point 8).

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project –Representative Photograph Pages City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, California
5 Photograph 9. East-facing view of a coast live oak approximately 10 feet northwest of the Project boundary (Photo Point 9).

Photograph 10. Representative photo of coast live oak regrowth along the northern Project boundary that does not require mitigation (Photo Point 10).

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project –Representative Photograph Pages City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, California
6 Photograph 11. North-facing view of coast live oak within the Project site that will require removal (Photo Point 11).

Photograph 12. South-southeast-facing view coast live oak approximately 15 feet south of the Project site (Photo Point 12).

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project –Representative Photograph Pages City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, California
7 Photograph 13. West-facing view of the coast live oak (orange arrow) requiring removal within the Project site (Photo Point 13).

Photograph 14. West-facing view of bare ground within the Project site, buffered by the San Jose Creek channel to the north and residential developments, including landscaped/ornamental vegetation, to the south (Photo Point 14).

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project –Representative Photograph Pages City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, California
8 Photograph 15. Northwest-facing view of the Project site north of the San Jose Creek channel consisting of disturbed habitat and bound to the north by a concrete wall (Photo Point 15).

Photograph 16. West-facing view of the Project site south of the San Jose Creek channel consisting of disturbed habitat and bound to the south by residential developments (Photo Point 16).

San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project –Representative Photograph Pages City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, California
9 Photograph 16. Northeast-facing view of the dry dock location within the San Jose Creek channel east of the SR-71 underpass.

ATTACHMENT C
Observed Wildlife Species List

AVES BIRDS
San Jose Creek Multi-use Bikeway Project – Wildlife Species List City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
ACCIPITRIDAE Kites, Hawks, Eagles, and Allies
Accipiter cooperii⁺ Cooper’s hawk
Buteo jamaicensis red-tailed hawk
Buteo lineatus red-shouldered hawk
COLUMBIDAE Pigeons & Doves
Patagioenas fasciata band-tailed pigeon
Streptopelia decaocto* Eurasian-collared dove
Zenaida macroura mourning dove
CORVIDAE Crows & Jays
Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow
FRINGILLIDAE Finches and Allies
Haemorhous mexicanus house finch
Spinus psaltria lesser goldfinch
MIMIDAE Mockingbirds & Thrashers
Mimus polyglottos northern mockingbird
PASSERELLIDAE New World Sparrows
Melospiza melodia song sparrow
Melozone crissalis California towhee
PARULIDAE Wood Warblers & relatives
Cardellina pusilla Wilson’s warbler
Geothlypis trichas common yellowthroat
STURNIDAE Starlings and Mynas
Sturnus vulgaris* European starling
TROCHILIDAE Hummingbirds
Calypte anna Anna’s hummingbird
Selasphorus sasin Allen’s hummingbird
TYRANNIDAE Tyrant Flycatchers
Pyrocephalus obscurus vermilion flycatcher
Sayornis nigricans black phoebe
Sayornis saya Say’s phoebe

MAMMALIA MAMMALS
CANIDAE Foxes, Wolves & Allies
Canis familiaris* domestic dog
Canis latrans coyote
FELIDAE Cats
Felis catus* domestic cat
GEOMYIDAE Gophers
Thomomys bottae Botta’s pocket gopher
LEPORIDAE Rabbits and Hares
Sylvillagus audubonii desert cottontail
PHASIANIDAEA Chickens, Pheasants & Allies
*Gallus domesticus domestic chicken
SCIURIDAE3 Squirrels
San Jose Creek Multi-use Bikeway Project – Wildlife Species List City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
Otospermophilus beecheyi California ground squirrel
Sciurus carolinensis* eastern gray squirrel

REPTILIA REPTILES
PHRYNOSOMATIDAE Spiny Lizards
Sceloporus occidentalis western fence lizard
Uta stansburiana common side-blotched lizard
*Non-native
⁺ CDFW Watch List Species

ATTACHMENT D
Plant Species Observed
San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project– Plant Species List Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA

OBSERVED PLANT SPECIES LIST

MONOCOTS
AGAVACEAE Agave Family
Agave sp.* agave
ARECACEAE Palm Family
Phoenix canariensis* Canary Island date palm
Syagrus romanzoffiana* queen palm
Washingtonia robusta** Mexican fan palm
POACEAE Grass Family
Arundo donax* giant reed
Bromus madritensis** compact brome
Cortaderia selloana** pampas grass
Ehrharta erecta** panic veldtgrass
Pennisetum setaceum** African fountain grass
Stipa miliacea var. miliacea** Smilo grass
DICOTS
AMARANTHACEAE Amaranth Family
Amaranthus albus* tumbleweed
ANACARDIACEAE Sumac Family
Schinus molle** Peruvian pepper tree
Schinus terebinthifolia* Brazilian pepper tree
APOCYNACEAE Dogbone Family
Nerium oleander* oleander
ARALIACEAE Ginseng Family
Hedera helix** english ivy
ASTERACEAE Sunflower Family
Baccharis salicifolia mule fat
Baccharis sarothroides broom baccharis
Baccharis pilularis coyote brush
Centaurea melitensis** tocalote
Cirsium vulgare** bull thistle
Erigeron bonariensis* flax-leaved horseweed
Erigeron canadensis* horseweed
Helianthus annuus common sunflower
Heterotheca grandiflora telegraph weed
Lactuca serriola* prickly lettuce
BIGNONIACEAE Bignonia Family
Tecoma capensis* cape honeysuckle
BRASSICACEAE Mustard Family
San Jose Creek Multi-use Bikeway Project – Plant Species Observed City of Pomona, Los Angeles County, CA
Brassica nigra** black mustard
Hirschfeldia incana** short-pod mustard
CHENOPODIACEAE Goosefoot Family
Salsola tragus** Russian thistle
EUPHORBIACEAE Spurge Family
Ricinus communis** castor bean
FABACEAE Legume Family
Acacia cyclops** coastal wattle
FAGACEAE Beech Family
Quercus agrifolia coast live oak
MYRTACEAE Myrtle Family
Eucalyptus camaldulensis* river red gum
Eucalyptus globulus** blue gum
NYCTAGINACEAE The Four O’clock Family
Bougainvillea spectabilis* great bougainvillea
OLEACEAE Olive Family
Fraxinus sp. ash
Olea europea** olive
PLATANACEAE Plane-tree Family
Platanus racemosa California sycamore
RUTACEAE Citrus Family
various citrus species* various citrus species
SALICACEAE Willow Family
Populus fremontii Fremont cottonwood
Salix lasiolepis arroyo willow
SIMAROUBACEAE Quassia Family
Ailanthus altissima* tree of heaven
SOLANACEAE Nightshade Family
Datura stramonium* jimsonweed
Nicotiana glauca* tree tobacco
ULMACEAE Elm Family
Ulmus parvifolia* Siberian elm
VIBURNACEAE Elder Family
Sambucus mexicana blue elderberry
VITACEAE Grape Family
Vitis vinifera* common grape vine

GYMNOSPERMS
PINACEAE Pine Family
Pinus sp.* pine
*Non-native
**Non-native and invasive according to the California Invasive Plant Council Appendix C
Cultural Resources Inventory Report

Cultural Resources Inventory Report
for the
San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
Prepared for:

Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
617 W 7th St #1103
Los Angeles, CA 90017
June 2025
Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the
San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
Prepared for:

Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
617 W 7th St #1103
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Prepared by:

Ascent Environmental
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
Contact:

Roberto Mora, RPA
June 2025
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................... II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Purpose and Scope .........................................................................................................................................................................ES-1 Inventory Conclusion and Recommendations.......................................................................................................................ES-1 Disposition of Data.........................................................................................................................................................................ES-2 Personnel Qualifications ...............................................................................................................................................................ES-2 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1-1

1.1 Project Description and Location..................................................................................................................................1-1

1.2 Regulatory Context...........................................................................................................................................................1-5 2 RECORDS SEARCHES AND TRIBAL OUTREACH ................................................................................................................2-1

2.1 Records Search...................................................................................................................................................................2-1

2.2 Other Sources....................................................................................................................................................................2-2

2.3 Native American Outreach............................................................................................................................................2-3

2.4 Field Methods....................................................................................................................................................................2-3 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ...................................................................................................................................................3-1

3.1 Geology and Soils .............................................................................................................................................................3-1 4 CULTURAL SETTING ................................................................................................................................................................ 4-1

4.1 Native American PreContact Setting..........................................................................................................................4-1

4.2 Ethnohistoric Setting.......................................................................................................................................................4-2

4.3 Historic Era Native American Setting ........................................................................................................................4-3

4.4 Historic Period Overview ...............................................................................................................................................4-4 5 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................................................................5-1

5.1 Background Research Results .......................................................................................................................................5-1

5.2 Pedestrian Survey Results...............................................................................................................................................5-1

5.3 Potential for Buried Archaeological Deposits..........................................................................................................5-1 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................................................6-1 7 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7-1 Appendices
A Record Search Results
B Tribal Correspondence
Figures
Figure 1-1 Regional Location..............................................................................................................................................................1-2 Figure 1-2 Project Alignment..............................................................................................................................................................1-3 Figure 5-1 Eastern Portion of Project Alignment........................................................................................................................5-2 Figure 5-2 Western Portion of Project Alignment......................................................................................................................5-3 Tables
Table 2-1 Resources Outside, but Within 0.25-mile radius from the Project Alignment.............................................2-1 Table 2-2 Reports Outside, but Within 0.25-mile radius from the Project Alignment..................................................2-1 Table 2-3 Native American Outreach Summary........................................................................................................................2-3 Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
ii San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Alta Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

APN Assessor’s Parcel Number
Ascent Ascent Environmental
BLM Bureau of Land Management
Cal calibrated
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System City City of Pomona
CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
CRIR cultural resources inventory report
DPR California Department of Parks and Recreation
MLD Most Likely Descendant
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NETR Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC
NRHP National Register of Historic Places
OPR CA Office of Planning and Research
PRC California Public Resources Code
SCCIC South Central Coast Information Center
SLF Sacred Lands File
SR State Route
Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project ES-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PURPOSE AND SCOPE
Ascent Environmental (Ascent) prepared a cultural resources inventory report (CRIR) for Alta Planning + Design, Inc (Alta) for the San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project (project) located in the City of Pomona (City), in Los Angeles County.

The City is acting as the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) lead agency for this project. The services provided included a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), intensive pedestrian survey of the project alignment, and an assessment of potential project impacts. This study was completed in compliance with Section 15064.5(a)(2)-(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, using the criteria outlined in Section 5024.1 of the California Public Resources Code (PRC). The presence of, or the potential for the presence of tribal cultural resources as defined by PRC Section 21074, is not included in this study.

The SCCIC California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search indicated that one cultural resources study has been completed within project alignment, and 14 cultural resources studies have been completed outside the project alignment but within the 0.25-mile record search radius (Appendix A). The CHRIS search also indicated no cultural resources have been previously recorded within the project alignment, and that four cultural resources have been recorded within the 0.25-mile search radius.

A search of the SLF administered by the NAHC was conducted on May 31, 2024 (Appendix B). The results of the search were positive for the presence of known cultural resources of tribal importance. Attached to the results was a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project alignment. Emails describing the project and its location were sent to the individuals and tribes listed on October 14, 2024. Results of this outreach are provided in Section 2.3.1.

A pedestrian survey of the project alignment was conducted on September 30, 2024, by Ascent’s staff archaeologist, Roberto Mora, RPA. No cultural resources were identified as a result of the pedestrian survey.

INVENTORY CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
No unique archaeological sites or historical resources of an archaeological nature were identified within the project alignment as a result of the background research or pedestrian survey. In addition, analysis of geotechnical data for the project alignment indicates there is a very low possibility for the presence of intact subsurface archaeological resources to be present within the project alignment. However, even though no cultural resources have been identified as a result of this cultural study, it is still recommended that the following measures be applied to the project:
 Inadvertent Discoveries – Archaeological Resources: If archaeological materials are inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing activities, including midden soils, stone tools, chipped stone, baked clay, or concentrations of shell, bone, charcoal, glass, metal, or ceramics, all work shall cease within 100 feet (30.5 meters) of the find and the services of a professional archaeologist shall be retained immediately. At that time, the City of Pomona shall coordinate any necessary investigation of the site with the archaeologist as needed to evaluate the significance of the resource per PRC Section 5024.1 and 21083.2(g) and provide proper management recommendations. If the find is determined to be a historical resource and/or a unique archeological resource, contingency funding and a time allotment sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures and/or mitigation will be made available. Possible management recommendations for significant resources could include resource avoidance or data recovery excavations. The contractor shall implement any measures deemed necessary by the archeologist for the protection of the cultural resources. Do not resume work in the area of the discovery until directed to do so by the archaeologist.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

ES-2 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
Discovery of human remains is not expected; however, if human remains should be discovered, the following measure should be implemented.
 Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains are discovered during construction activities, work within 100 feet (30.5 meters) of the remains shall be stopped immediately, and the project proponent shall notify the Los Angeles County Coroner, in accordance with Section 5097.98 of the PRC and Section 7050.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined by the coroner to be Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours, and they will designate a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). Together the landowner and the MLD shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains in accordance with PRC Section 5097.94.

DISPOSITION OF DATA
This report will be filed with the SCCIC at California State University, Fullerton, and Ascent’s office in Sacramento. All field notes and other documentation related to the study are on file at Ascent’s Sacramento office.

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
Roberto Mora has over 10 years of cultural resource management experience in throughout the western United States. He has served as the lead archaeological technician and co-field director on a variety of project types. Roberto has expertise in the precontact history of the Great Basin and California, human osteology, faunal remains, monitoring, survey and excavation methods, and laboratory analysis. His experience includes archaeological survey, monitoring, excavation, laboratory processing and cataloging, report writing, and data recovery of precontact and historic era archaeological sites. Roberto meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for archaeology and the Caltrans Professional Qualification Standards as a principal investigator in precontact archaeology.

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 1-1
1 INTRODUCTION
Alta retained Ascent to complete a CRIR for the project, located in Pomona, California. The project alignment is currently disturbed and is used for access to the channelized San Jose Creek. The City is the lead agency for this project under CEQA.

Ascent conducted this CRIR in compliance with PRC Section 21083.2 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. This CRIR details the methods and results of the study, which consisted of a records search, a SLF search and tribal outreach, an intensive pedestrian field survey, and a potential impact assessment for cultural resources.

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
The proposed project is located in the city of Pomona, in eastern Los Angeles County (Figure 1-1). The 3.5-mile alignment extends along San Jose Creek from Temple Avenue in the western portion of the city to Murchison Avenue in the central portion of the city (Figure 1-2). The westernmost portion of the proposed bikeway at Temple Avenue and Campus Drive is directly across from Cal Poly Pomona. The proposed alignment would cross under the Orange Freeway (State Route [SR]-57) and Chino Valley Freeway (SR-71) and terminates just south of the San Bernardino Freeway (Interstate [I]-10).

San Jose Creek is an intermittent, tributary stream that flows nearly 20 miles westward from the city of Pomona into the San Gabriel River through the Pomona Valley and San Gabriel Valley. Within the project area, San Jose Creek is a 14-foot-wide concrete-lined channel with vertical walls and chain-link fencing along both sides. The proposed project alignment varies between 16 feet wide up to 35 feet wide and includes areas along the north and south sides of the channel in various locations along the alignment. The alignment extends along the north side of San Jose Creek from Temple Avenue to Ridgeway Street and from Fairplex Drive to Dudley Street; it switches to the south side of San Jose Creek from Ridgeway Street to Fairplex Drive and from Dudley Street to Murchison Avenue.

Upon completion of the proposed project, the City would have completed more than 50 percent of the priority projects identified in the Active Transportation Plan. The proposed project would reduce network gaps; offer greater access and route options throughout the city, particularly to and from the future Metro Foothill Gold Line Station; and provide stronger connections across two of the Pomona’s major barriers, I-10 and SR-71. The proposed project would address five of the City’s high-priority network gaps and would double the available low-stress bicycle networks, directing users away from roadways that have histories of bicycle and pedestrian collisions.

The proposed project would also connect to existing active transportation facilities, including other bicycle paths, lanes, and routes. By establishing these connections, the proposed project would expand safe and convenient access to destinations throughout Pomona, including five public schools (Kellogg Polytechnic Elementary, Arroyo Elementary, Lopez Elementary, Ganesha High School, and John Marshall Middle School), three grocery stores (Perez Market, Ace Market, Cardenas Market), and two parks (Cesar Chavez Park and John F. Kennedy Park). This project is intended to benefit students and residents already walking and biking and would make it more likely for those with safety concerns to be able to choose active and healthier modes of transportation.

The demolition phase involves removal of existing fencing, gates, and asphalt in select locations. The existing 4-foothigh chain-link fencing along the top of the concrete channel wall would be removed along the proposed alignment.

This would occur along both the north and south sides of the San Jose Creek, respective to the side in which the proposed bike path is proposed. The proposed bikeway would be 10 feet wide with 2-foot-wide shoulders on each side and would be constructed of asphalt concrete for the full extent of the proposed alignment. The existing 4-foothigh chain-link fencing along the San Jose Creek channel would be removed and replaced with 6-foot-high new chain-link fence along the channel side of the pathway.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
1-2 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
Source: Adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2024.

Figure 1-1 Regional Location
Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 1-3
Source: Adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2024.

Figure 1-2 Project Alignment

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 1-5

1.2 REGULATORY CONTEXT

1.2.1 State

CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
All properties in California that are listed in or formally determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). The CRHR is a listing of State of California resources that are significant in the context of California’s history. It is a Statewide program with a scope and with criteria for inclusion similar to those used for the NRHP. In addition, properties designated under municipal, or county ordinances are also eligible for listing in the CRHR.

A historic resource must be significant at the local, state, or national level under one or more of the criteria defined in the California Code of Regulations Title 15, Chapter 11.5, Section 4850 to be included in the CRHR. The CRHR criteria are tied to CEQA because any resource that meets the criteria below is considered a significant historical resource under CEQA. As noted above, all resources listed in or formally determined eligible for listing in the NRHP are automatically listed in the CRHR.

The CRHR uses four evaluation criteria for significance:

Criterion 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States.

Criterion 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history.

Criterion 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction; represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values.

Criterion 4. Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.

A property must have both significance and integrity to be considered eligible for listing in the CRHR. Loss of integrity, if sufficiently great, will overwhelm the historical significance of a resource and render it ineligible. Likewise, a resource can have complete integrity, but if it lacks significance, it must also be considered ineligible. Integrity is evaluated by regarding the property’s retention of its location, design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling, and association to its period of significance. These seven factors can be roughly grouped into three types of integrity considerations. Location and setting relate to the relationship between the property and its environment. Design, materials, and workmanship, as they apply to historic buildings, relate to construction methods and architectural details. Feeling and association are the least objective of the seven factors and pertain to the overall ability of the property to convey a sense of the historical time and place in which it was constructed.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
CEQA requires public agencies to consider the effects of their actions on “historical resources,” and “unique archaeological resources.” Pursuant to PRC Section 21084.1, a “project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment.” PRC Section 21083.2 requires agencies to determine whether projects would have effects on unique archaeological resources.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
1-6 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
Historical Resources
“Historical resource” is a term with a defined statutory meaning (PRC Section 21084.1; State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064.5[a] and [b]). Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a), historical resources include the following:
1) A resource listed in or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission for listing in, the CRHR (PRC Section 5024.1).
2) A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k) or identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g), will be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant. 3) Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered to be a historical resource, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource will be considered by the lead agency to be historically significant if the resource meets the criteria for listing in the CRHR (PRC Section 5024.1).
4) The fact that a resource is not listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the CRHR, not included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to PRC Section 5020.1[k]) or identified in a historical resources survey (meeting the criteria in PRC Section 5024.1[g]) does not preclude a lead agency from determining that the resource may be a historical resource as defined in PRC Sections 5020.1(j) or 5024.1.

Unique Archaeological Resources
CEQA also requires lead agencies to consider whether projects will affect unique archaeological resources. PRC Section 21083.2(g) states that “unique archaeological resource” means an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets one or more of the following criteria:
1) Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information.
2) Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type. 3) Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person.

Mitigation of Impacts to Archaeological Resources
Treatment options under PRC Section 21083.2 (b) to mitigate impacts to archaeological resources include activities that preserve such resources in place in an undisturbed state. PRC Section 21083.2 states:
(a) As part of the determination made pursuant to Section 21080.1, the lead agency shall determine whether the project may have a significant effect on archaeological resources. If the lead agency determines that the project may have a significant effect on unique archaeological resources, the environmental impact report shall address the issue of those resources. An environmental impact report, if otherwise necessary, shall not address the issue of nonunique archaeological resources. A negative declaration shall be issued with respect to a project if, but for the issue of nonunique archaeological resources, the negative declaration would be otherwise issued. (b) If it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts to be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. Examples of that treatment, in no order of preference, may include, but are not limited to, any of the following:
(1) Planning construction to avoid archaeological sites. (2) Deeding archaeological sites into permanent conservation easements.

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 1-7
(3) Capping or covering archaeological sites with a layer of soil before building on the sites. (4) Planning parks, greenspace, or other open space to incorporate archaeological sites. (c) To the extent that unique archaeological resources are not preserved in place or not left in an undisturbed state, mitigation measures shall be required as provided in this subdivision. (d) Excavation as mitigation shall be restricted to those parts of the unique archaeological resource that would be damaged or destroyed by the project.

CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORICAL, CULTURAL, AND SACRED SITES ACT The California Native American Historical, Cultural, and Sacred Sites Act (PRC Section 5097.9) applies to both State and private lands. The act requires, upon discovery of human remains, that construction or excavation activity cease and that the county coroner be notified. If the remains are those of a Native American, the coroner must notify the NAHC, which notifies (and has the authority to designate) the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) of the deceased. The act stipulates the procedures the descendants may follow for treating or disposing of the remains and associated grave goods.

HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE, SECTION 7050
Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code requires that construction or excavation be stopped in the vicinity of discovered human remains until the coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native American. If they are determined to be those of a Native American, the coroner must contact NAHC.

PUBLIC RESOURCE CODE SECTION 5097
PRC Section 5097 specifies the procedures to be followed in the event of the unexpected discovery of human remains and paleontological resources on nonfederal land. The disposition of Native American human burials falls within the jurisdiction of the NAHC while local agencies have jurisdiction over the disposition of paleontological resources. Section 5097.5 of the Code states the following:

No person shall knowingly and willfully excavate upon, or remove, destroy, injure, or deface any historic or prehistoric ruins, burial grounds, archaeological or vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints, inscriptions made by human agency, or any other archaeological, paleontological, or historical feature, situated on public lands, except with the express permission of the public agency having jurisdiction over such lands. Violation of this section is a misdemeanor.

1.2.2 Local
Pomona General Plan
The Pomona General Plan policies applicable to the proposed project are listed below. 7F.P34. Promote preservation of older historic landscapes and natural features that help to define neighborhoods or maintain the context of historic districts and landmarks. 7F.P35. Per the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), require that new development avoid or reduce potential impacts to archaeological, paleontological and historic resources. 7F.P39. Require that for proposed developments with the potential to adversely impact cultural resources, notification be sent to cultural organizations, including Native American organizations. 7F.P41. Maintain sources of information regarding paleontological and archaeological sites and the names and addresses of responsible organizations and qualified individuals, who can analyze, classify, record, and preserve paleontological or archeological findings.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
1-8 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
7F.P42. Require a qualified paleontologist/archeologist to monitor all grading and/or excavation where there is a potential to affect cultural, archaeological, or paleontological resources. If these resources are found, the applicant shall implement the recommendations of the paleontologist/archeologist, subject to the approval of the Planning Divisions.
7F.P43. Require new development to donate scientifically valuable paleontological or archaeological materials to a responsible public or private institution with a suitable repository, located within Pomona, or Los Angeles County, whenever possible.

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 2-1
2 RECORDS SEARCHES AND TRIBAL OUTREACH

2.1 RECORDS SEARCH
On June 18, 2024, a records search that included the project alignment and a 0.25-mile radius around the project alignment was completed at the SCCIC, at California State University, Fullerton (File No. 24-207). As part of the SCCIC record search, the following information was reviewed:
 site records of previously recorded cultural resources,  previous cultural studies,
 NRHP and CRHR listings,
 the California Historic Resources Inventory,
 Built Environment Resource Directory for Los Angeles County, and  historical maps (USGS Topographic and GLO Plat maps).

Review of the SCCIC records search results revealed that there are no previously recorded resources within the project alignment, and there are four previously recorded resources within the 0.25-mile radius of the project alignment (Appendix A). The records search also found that one previous investigation has occurred within the project alignment, and 14 investigations have occurred within a 0.25-mile radius. The previous investigation within the project alignment, LA-10561, covers approximately five percent of the project alignment.

Table 2-1 lists the resources within 0.25-mile radius from the project alignment. Table 2-2 lists the cultural resource studies within 0.25-mile radius from the project alignment.

Table 2-1 Resources Outside, but Within 0.25-mile radius from the Project Alignment Primary Number/
Trinomial Year (Author, Affiliation) Age Attribute Codes P-19-150397 1993 (F. Smith, Myra L Frank & Associates) Historic era HP02 (Single family property) P-19-150398 1993 (F. Smith, Myra L Frank & Associates) Historic era HP02 Single family property) P-19-150400 1993 (F. Smith, Myra L Frank & Associates) Historic Era HP02 (Single family property) P-19-188186 2004 (C.J. Hetzel) Historic Era HP16 (Religious building) Source: Compiled by Ascent in 2024.

Table 2-2 Reports Outside, but Within 0.25-mile radius from the Project Alignment Report Number Year Author/Affiliation Title
LA-00279 1981 Whitney-Desautels, Nancy A.

Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc.

Archaeological/historical Survey Report on the Kellogg Plaza Site, Pomona, County of Los Angeles.

LA-00575 1979 Beth Padon
Contract Archaeologist
An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the 40 Acre Extension of the Spadra Landfill, Pomona, Los Angeles County, Ca.

LA-02932 1993
Wlodarski, Robert J.

Historical, Environmental,
Archaeological, Research, Team
Negative Archaeological Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes on Interstate 10 (i-10) From the Junction of State Route 57 (SR 57/interstate 610 (i-210) in the City of Pomona to the Los Angeles/San Bernardino County Line 07-la-i10/p.m. 4.

LA-03306 1993
Whitney-Desautels, Nancy A.
and Wayne H. Bonner
Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc.

Historic Property Survey Report Interstate 10 HOV Widening Los Angeles County, California Caltrans District 7.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
2-2 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
Report Number Year Author/Affiliation Title
LA-03779 1994 Smith, Francesca
Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc.

Historic Property Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Interstate 10 Between Sr 57/I-210 and the Los Angeles County/San Bernardino County Line in Los Angeles County 07-la-10-41.7/48.3.

LA-03779 1993
Wlodarski, Robert J.

Historical, Environmental,
Archaeological, Research, Team
Negative Archaeological Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes on Interstate 10 (I-10) From the Junction of State Route 57 (SR-57 / Interstate 610 (I-210)) in the City of Pomona to the Los Angeles / San Bernardino County Line 07-LA-110/P.M. 41.7/48.3.

LA-04835 1999 Ashkar, Shahira
Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report for Williams Communications, Inc.

Proposed Fiber Optic Cable System Installation Project, Los Angeles to Riverside, Los Angeles and Riverside Counties.

LA-05643 2002 Duke, Curt
LSA Associates, Inc.

Cultural Resource Assessment: Cingular Wireless Facility No. Sb 148-01 Los Angeles County.

LA-05925 1994 Smith, Francesca
Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc.

Historic Property Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Interstate 10 Sr57/i-210 and the Los Angeles County/San Bernardino County Lines in Los Angeles 07-la-10-41.7/48.3.

LA-06260 2002 Duke, Curt
LSA Associates, Inc.

Cultural Resource Assessment at & T Wireless Services Facility No. D293c Los Angeles County, California.

LA-08828 2007 Bonner, Wayne H.

Michael Brandman Associates
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for Royal Streel Communications, LLC Candidate La2337a (i-10 at White), 875 West Orange Grove, Avenue, Pomona, Los Angeles County, California.

LA-09079 2004
Bonner, Wayne H. and
Christeen Taniguchi
Michael Brandman Associates
Records Search Results and Site Visit for Sprint Telecommunications Facility Candidate La60xc010a (brethren Church) 875 West Orange Grove Avenue, Pomona, Los Angeles County, California.

LA-10190 2002 Harbert, Claudia
Caltrans
Supplemental Historic Property Survey Report for the I-10 HOV Lane Between I605 and the SR-57/SR-71/I-210 Interchange in the Cities of Los Angeles, Baldwin Park, West Covina, Covina, San Dimas, and Pomona in Los Angeles County, CA.

LA-11119 2010 Vaughan-Acton, Sandra
Cal Poly Pomona Foundation Construction of Innovation Way, Innovation Village Research Park, Pomona, CA.

LA-12978 2015
Losee, Carolyn
Archaeological Resources
Technology
Cultural Resources Investigation for Trileaf 611939 Verizon “Lyndale” 900 Corporate Center Drive, Pomona, Los Angeles County, California 91768.

Source: Compiled by Ascent in 2024.

2.2 OTHER SOURCES
Additional research included review of historic USGS topographic maps and aerials available on-line from Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC (NETR). Historic USGS topographic maps from 1897 to 2021 and aerial images from 1938 to 2020 were reviewed. In addition, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 1877 Plat map was reviewed. The aerials show that Thompson Creek has been there as early as 1938 and continues to be present today. Similarly, Thompson Wash (creek) appears in the topo as early as 1928 and continues to be present today. It is likely that Thompson creek has been reinforced or channelized over time. Thompson Creek is presently known as the San Jose Creek, The 1877 Plat map revealed Rancho San Jose overlaying portions of the project alignment (see Section 4.4.1, “Regional History,” for additional information).

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 2-3

2.3 NATIVE AMERICAN OUTREACH
On May 31, 2024, Ascent received the positive results of the SLF search (Appendix B). Attached to the results letter was a list of Native American individuals/groups that may have knowledge of cultural resources on the project alignment. On October 14, 2024, emails were sent to all groups and individuals provided by the NAHC. On October 15, 2024, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians responded that they defer any comments to Soboba Band of Luiseno Indian. No responses from the other tribes have been received to date. Table 2-3 provides a summary of who was contacted, how, when, and the response, if any. Copies of the correspondence are included in Appendix B.

Table 2-3 Native American Outreach Summary
Name and Title Affiliation Date and Medium of Contact Response Summary Andrew Salas, Chairperson Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation
October 14, 2024
Email None to date.

Christina Swindall Martinez,
Secretary
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians -
Kizh Nation
October 14, 2024
Email None to date.

Anthony Morales, Chairperson Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians
October 14, 2024
Email None to date.

Christina Conley, Cultural
Resource Administrator
Gabrielino Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
October 14, 2024
Email None to date.

Robert Dorame, Chairperson Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council
October 14, 2024
Email None to date.

Sandonne Goad, Chairperson Gabrielino/Tongva Nation October 14, 2024 Email None to date.

Sam Dunlap, Cultural Resource
Director Gabrielino/Tongva Nation October 14, 2024Email None to date.

Charles Alvarez, Chairperson Gabrielino/Tongva Nation October 14, 2024 Email None to date.

Steven Estrada, Tribal Chairman Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians October 14, 2024 Email None to date.

Vanessa Minott, Tribal
Administrator Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians October 14, 2024 Email
The tribe responded on October 15,
2024, that they defer any comments
to Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians.

Jessica Valdez, Cultural Resource
Specialist Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians October 14, 2024Email None to date.

Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians October 14, 2024 Email None to date.

Joseph Ontiveros, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians October 14, 2024Email None to date.

Source: Compiled by Ascent in 2024.

2.4 FIELD METHODS
An intensive archaeological survey of the project alignment was conducted on September 30, 2024, by Roberto Mora, RPA, of Ascent. Special attention was given to bare patches of ground, excavated areas, rodent back dirt piles, cut-banks, berms, and exposed soils. Surveyed areas were photographed. The results of the survey are detailed in Section 5.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
2-4 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
This page is intentionally left blank.

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 3-1
3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project alignment is located in the Pomona Valley in the far eastern region of Los Angeles County on its border with San Bernardino County. Regional access to Pomona is via I-10, SR-60, SR-71, and SR-57. The Pomona Valley is approximately 250 square miles. It is bounded by the communities of San Dimas, La Verne, and Claremont to the north, Montclair and Chino to the east, Chino Hills to the south, and Diamond Bar and Walnut to the west. The project alignment is located in a relatively flat topographic area (Historic Resources Group 2022).

Water is naturally available via numerous springs and artesian wells in the northern reaches of the valley along the foothills of the San Gabriel Valley. The area has several plant communities including Valley Grasslands, Coastal Sage Scrub, Oak Woodlands, and Chaparral. The project alignment is approximately 700 feet above mean sea level in the west and approximately 850 feet above mean sea level in the east.

3.1 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
The project alignment is within an alluvial valley with deposits mostly of sediment runoff from the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains to the north. Sediments within the project alignment consist of Quaternary aged deposits:

Holocene (recent to 10,000 years old) and Pleistocene (10,000 to 2 million years old) marine and non-marine terrace deposits, to older Pliocene to Late Miocene (3.6 to 11.62 million years ago) marine basin deposits (Dibblee and Minch 2002). Late Pleistocene and Holocene deposits are generally considered more likely to contain precontact archaeological deposits.

The surficial soil on the project alignment is classified as urban land, which exists in areas of high population density in the largely built environment (USDA 2024). These soils are a mix of several soils and nature human-transported or “fill” materials.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
3-2 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
This page is intentionally left blank.

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 4-1
4 CULTURAL SETTING

4.1 NATIVE AMERICAN PRECONTACT SETTING
The precontact setting of southern California is defined by different temporal periods and cultural complexes based on cross-dating of distinct artifact types, cultural patterns, and radiocarbon dates, if available. The cultural chronology of human occupation is characterized by changing settlement and subsistence strategies typically in response to environmental conditions, available resources, and population fluctuations. There is no single cultural historical framework that encompasses the entire precontact record for southern California. A generalized cultural sequence is provided below (Tetra Tech 2022).

4.1.1 Paleo-Indian and Terminal Pleistocene [13,000 Before Present (BP) to 9,000 BP]
There are very few recorded resources that represent this time in California. The lack of archaeological representation is often attributed to a mobile and low human population, the susceptibility of site to erosion (e.g., sea level rise, landslides, etc.), and alluvial and aeolian deposits. Available archaeological evidence suggested that Paleo-Indian groups were hunter and gatherers that were highly mobile and lived in temporary camps near fresh water sources.

The Paleo-Indian period is generally characterized by small mobile groups that utilized tools such as large, fluted points, crescents, domed scrapers, and flake tools of local chert. Groundstone is typically absent or rare.

The Arlington Springs (CA-SRI-173) and the Daisy Cave site (CA-SMI-261) provide evidence of a late Pleistocene occupation along the southern California Pacific Coast. The Arlington Springs site identified on Santa Rosa Island yielded human remains of one individual that date to approximately 13,000 BP, no other artifacts were recovered. The Daisy Cave site on San Miguel Island was first occupied around 11,500 BP, is associated with a small rock shelter, and yielded expedient flake tools and faunal remains that include shellfish (red abalone, black turban), and a few marine fish bones. The Arlington Springs and Daisy Cave sites represent a late Pleistocene maritime adaption near the mainland, suggesting people also used boat technology (Tetra Tech 2022).

4.1.2 Archaic Period (9,000 to 1,500 BP)
The Archaic Period (similar to Millingstone Horizon, Encinitas Tradition, La Jolla Complex) is characterized by a transition from large projectile point tool use to a period of extensive millingstone and core tool use. The artifact assemblage typically consists of millingstones (manos or handstones, and metates), hammerstones, crude scrapers, cores, and other flaked-based stone tools. Manos and metates are thought to have been used to process small, hard seeds (and possibly nut) associated with the local vegetation communities. Faunal assemblages from sites occupied along or near the southern California coast (bays, lagoons, and estuaries) suggest subsistence consisted primarily of shellfish and plant resources, with hunting and fishing secondary. Interior sites also illustrate an emphasis on processing floral (e.g., nuts and seeds) resources and hunting of a variety of faunal resources (e.g., deer). Populations were semisedentary (Tetra Tech 2022).

4.1.3 Late Precontact Period (1,500 BP to 1769)
The Late Precontact period is defined by regional local patterns of change, an increase of human population, resource intensification, sedentism, associated expansion of cultural practices, food storage, and the introduction of the bow and arrow. Assemblages are typically characterized by small projectile points, pottery, mortar and pestle, shell fishhooks, the use of asphaltum, decorative shell and bone ornaments, and cremations. Bedrock mortars (a shallow-hole mortar[s] in bedrock) are also attributed to this period. Subsistence during this period varied dependent upon the local environment and foraging adaptations. Overexploitation of high-ranking subsistence resources by Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
4-2 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
hunters and gatherers resulted in resource depression and the intensification of more labor intensive floral and faunal resources, such as small plant seeds (e.g., grasses), acorns, small shellfish, fish, and terrestrial animals. Settlement patterns during this period included large residential camps (e.g., villages) and smaller, subsistence-related shortterm encampments (Tetra Tech 2022).

4.2 ETHNOHISTORIC SETTING
The project alignment is located within the Los Angeles Basin, which is the ancestral home of the Native American group today referred to as the Tongva, Kizh, and/or Gabrielino/Gabrieliño/Gabrieleño. This context examines the historical background of Native American groups in Pomona. There are no extant built resources in the City of Pomona dating from the pre-1542 period. The study of archaeological resources is outside the scope of this project (Historic Resources Group 2022).

The Gabrielino/Tongva/Kizh have been identified by various names over the past two centuries. The Spanish settlers who colonized the area and developed the Mission San Gabriel Arcángel (San Gabriel Mission) assigned the name “Gabrieliño” to Native Americans associated with the Mission. In addition to the Gabrielino/Tongva/Kizh, some members of the Cahuilla and Serrano tribes were also historically encompassed under this nomenclature. Today, some descendants choose to refer to themselves as either Tongva or Kizh because they are terms of native, rather than Spanish, origin.

This historic context statement acknowledges and respects that each Native American tribe has the right for selfidentification and for that choice to be honored. Because the area that now comprises the City of Pomona is included in the ancestral home of several Native American tribes that identify by different names, this historic context statement adopts the inclusive term “Gabrielino/Tongva/Kizh” when referring to Pomona’s original Native American inhabitants.

For over 7,000 years, the Gabrielino/Tongva/Kizh have served as the traditional caretakers of the Los Angeles Basin, South Channel Islands, San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys, and portions of Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties. Historically, the Gabrielino/Tongva/Kizh were not a single “tribe,” but a collection of lineages (a group of families with a common ancestor) that shared a common Uto-Aztecan language, culture, religion, and lifestyle that distinguished them from neighboring groups. This group did not have a single unifying name, and it was common for tribes to refer to themselves in their own language simply as “people” or “men,” although they likely would have assigned tribes to other tribes.

Surrounding indigenous communities included the Chumash and the Tataviam/Alliklik to the north, the Serrano and Cahuilla to the east, and the Luiseño/Juaneño to the south. Interactions with surrounding groups were frequent and generally peaceful, occurring largely through the channels of intermarriage, matrilocal residence, and/or trade. The trade currency consisted of shell beads and objects made from steatite, a type of soapstone found on Catalina Island.

Their territory was so expansive, in fact, that it spanned several ecological zones. Consequently, the group’s settlement and subsistence patterns varied slightly within each zone based on microenvironmental conditions, but on the whole, thrived on hunting, gathering, and fishing activities.

Like that of other Native American groups in California, acorns became a staple food over time, supplemented by the roots, leaves, seeds, and fruits of a variety of flora (e.g., islay, cactus, yucca, sages, and agave) as well as both large and small mammals. The group’s subsistence practices were often focused on local estuarine, coastal, and nearcoastal resources.

Studies indicate that habitation sites were hierarchically organized around estuaries and varied in size based on resource availability. While some estuaries supported large settlements, other estuaries supported linked but separated smaller habitation sites. Recent research implies that groups living near smaller estuaries practiced a strategy of mobility, employing foraging when resources were scarce. While it is difficult to estimate their population over time, evidence suggests that at the time of European contact in the 1500s there may have been more than fifty to one hundred mainland villages reflecting a range in population sizes.

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 4-3
Villages were politically autonomous and largely organized through shared kinship ties; each village was headed by a chief, who was usually descended from the prevailing lineage of the village. The chief typically spoke multiple languages, negotiated social relations, collected taxes, and directed the community’s seasonal migrations. In addition to the chief, spiritual leaders also had authority over the tribal community. It appears that the Gabrielino/Tongva/Kizh also shared some rituals with the Chumash to the north, based on the distribution of similar stone effigies in the precontact period (Historic Resources Group 2022).

4.3 HISTORIC ERA NATIVE AMERICAN SETTING
The Mexican-American War (1846-48) was settled by the Treaty of Guadalupe, which ceded California to the United States. Treaty required the United States to maintain and protect California Indians, including the Gabrielino Tribe recognized to inhabit the geographic area of the Los Angeles Basin, in the free enjoyment of their liberty, property and religion (Gabrielino 2024).

In 1851-53, three U.S. Government Treaty Commissioners appointed by President Fillmore signed the 18 “lost treaties,” setting aside 8.5 million acres in California for Indian reservations in return for the Indians’ quitclaim to 75 million acres of California land. The 18 “lost treaties” recognized the Tongva but were never adopted.

Approximately 1.2 million acres were promised to the Gabrielino Tribe and other Mission Indians included 50,000 acres on the San Sebastian Reserve at the Tejon Pass at the edge of Los Angeles County, and a temporary reservation to which a number of Gabrielino families had been relocated. This 50,000-acre reserve was never officially taken into trust, but instead ended up as the private property of the Superintendent of Indian Affairs, Edward Beale, who incorporated it into his newly named "Tejon Ranch.”
Based upon discovery of the 18 “lost treaties” in 1905, a series of efforts were made to address the treaty-less Gabrielino Tribe, or at least to compromise its claims to land in Los Angeles County. The California Jurisdiction Act of 1928 authorized the California Attorney General to represent the Gabrielino Tribe, among others, and to bring their land claims before the U.S. Court of Claims. The Court of Claims, in California Indians v. US (1941) 98 Ct. Cols, 583, recognized the arguments of the young California Attorney General, Earl Warren, that “a promise made to these tribes and bands of Indians and accepted by them but the treaties were never ratified so the promise was never fulfilled” (Gabrielino 2024).

Acting to “recognize the equitable claims” of the Gabrielinos and “all the Indians of California,” the Court awarded 7 cents an acre as compensation for the 8.5 million acres of land which was never set up as reservations under the 18 “lost treaties.” From this sum was deducted the cost of administration of the claims. In 1850, some 94 years earlier, no public lands were purchased for less than $1.50 per acre. The Court of Claims awarded no interest for the 94-year period between signature of the 1851-53 Treaties and payment of the monies in 1944.

After World War II reminded the public of the sacrifices of Native American soldiers, and the 1944 payments were seen as woefully inadequate, a second effort to settle land claims was begun under new legislation in 1946. The Indian Claims Commission addressed the claims of the Gabrielino Tribe in Docket 80, where the Gabrielino group was treated as an Indian tribe, but only its members were named as plaintiffs. This legal fiction would appear to a modern lawyer to eviscerate the effectiveness of the land claims settlement, which addressed only the claims of individual Indians (and not the land claims of the Tribe itself). In 1950, under the Eisenhower policy of “Assimilation” of Native American Tribes, the Gabrielino-Tongva were effectively terminated.

In 1959, the Court of Claims entered a final order recognizing the aboriginal title of the Gabrielino Tribe and other California tribes to 64 million acres west of the Sierra Nevada Range. The tribe’s title was recognized and $633 was paid to each Gabrielino in 1972. As part of the efforts to adjudicate the two land claim payments in 1944 and 1972, hundreds of Gabrielino tribal members were recognized as “Gabrielino Indians” on each of the Bureau of Indian Affairs California Indian Rolls of 1928, 1950, and 1972.

The Eisenhower policy of “assimilation” also lead to the adoption of over 50,000 Native American children into white, often suburban households (until the practice was ended by the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978). The settlement of Gabrielino land claims and the “assimilation” of Gabrielino Indians was administered by Commissioner of Indian Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
4-4 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
Affairs Dillon S. Meyer. Mr. Meyer had previously distinguished himself as chief administrator of the Japanese internment camps in California.

In 1994, the State of California recognized the Tongva in Assembly Joint Resolution 96, chaptered by the California Secretary of State as Resolution chapter 146, Statutes of 1994. The Joint Resolution states that the State of California “recognizes the Gabrielino-Tongva Nation as the aboriginal tribe of the Los Angeles Basin and takes great pride in recognizing the Indian inhabitance of the Los Angeles Basin and the continued existence of the Indian community” (Gabrielino 2024).

4.4 HISTORIC PERIOD OVERVIEW

4.4.1 Regional History
Pomona Valley's story began between 2000 and 500 BP with the inhabitance of the Gabrielino (Tongva) and Serrano Natives, nomadic hunter-gatherers who often lived near sources of water (Cal Poly Pomona 2024).

This changed in the late 1700s with the beginning of Spanish interest in the land now known as California and their introduction of the mission system in 1769. The San Gabriel Mission was built in Southern California in 1771 as the fourth of twenty-one missions, by 1800 holding a population of more than 1,000 natives. It was the most productive mission within the system because of its fertile land, but like the others, it had an overall negative impact on the native population. In 1821, Mexico declared independence from Spain and gained control of California in the process.

Thirteen years later, Mexico passed the Secularization Act of 1834, opening mission lands to private ownership and thus setting the stage for Pomona Valley’s new residents (Cal Poly Pomona 2024).

Ygnacio Palomares and Ricardo Vejar were two prominent pioneers in the region that encompasses present-day Pomona. In 1837, Palomares and Vejar traveled east in search of land for a new ranching enterprise, and ultimately petitioned the government for a 15,000-acre swath of land in the Pomona Valley. On April 15, 1837, Governor Juan Bautista Alvarado granted Palomares and Vejar the area, which came to be known as the Rancho San José. Palomares and Vejar split the ranch between them, with Palomares settling in the north and Vejar in the south. The rancho was accessible via the road that connected the San Gabriel Mission with San Bernardino, which became known as the San José Road (Historic Resources Group 2022).

The boom of the 1880s came as great stretches of land were divided and sold to settlers and businessmen alike. In 1885, the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe (Santa Fe) Railway made plans to unite its rail line to a connection that ran between San Bernardino and Los Angeles, at the same time buying out Southern Pacific's assets in the region. A rate war between Santa Fe and Southern Pacific railways began in 1886 and peaked in in 1887, bringing ticket prices down as much as 80 percent. The significant rate decrease resulted in increased tourism and immigration from the eastern United States. For the Pomona Valley, the boom reached its peak in 1887 when plans were made with the Santa Fe Railway for a depot and route through Pomona and Claremont. (Cal Poly Pomona 2024).

4.4.2 Local History
The City of Pomona was named as a result of an 1875 naming contest held by the Los Angeles Immigration and Land Cooperative Association real estate investors who sought to promote and resell the land. Citrus worker Solomon Gates won the competition with Pomona, the Roman goddess of fruits. On January 6, 1888, the name Pomona was formally adopted with the City’s official incorporation. Though the citrus industry didn’t come into force until later years, the representation granted by the goddess “Pomona” was astoundingly fitting and became associated with the citrus industry (Cal Poly Pomona 2024).

By 1911, Pomona was added as an extension to Los Angeles’ Pacific Electric Street railcar network. The "Big Red Cars" served much of the San Gabriel Valley into the Western Pomona Valley from 1911 through the 1950s. At the same time, Pomona was beginning to acquaint itself with the automobile through a tourist service that ran from Pasadena’s Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 4-5
Green Hotel to Pomona’s Palomares Hotel. By 1912, Pomona had a network of paved roads connecting it to neighboring cities.

World War II marked a turning point for the city of Pomona as California was transformed into a hub for the Pacific Theater. In the domestic sphere, the Pomona Fairgrounds were used for training and housing military personnel, held 5,400 Japanese-Americans awaiting internment, and detained German and Italian prisoners of war. The war saw the rise of aircraft and shipbuilding companies, Lockheed, Douglas, Northrop, Kaiser, and North American to aid in wartime production.

Although the citrus industry thrived as its products supplied allied forces during World War II, the end of the war also signaled the industry's decline. Many groves were eventually sold to make way for land development and the city’s growing population. The 1980s saw the loss of companies like Broadway Glass and Pomona Tile, with a later loss of jobs in the closing down of defense contractor General Dynamics. As these industries departed, so did Pomona residents who no longer had a place of employment. The city’s demographics shifted as a result, going from a population that was mostly Caucasian to one is predominantly Hispanic. These minority groups grew into important parts of city politics, and now dominate the City's political sphere (Cal Poly Pomona 2024).

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
4-6 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
This page is intentionally left blank.

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 5-1
5 RESULTS

5.1 BACKGROUND RESEARCH RESULTS
The results of the SCCIC record search found no previously recorded cultural resources within the project alignment, and that one previous cultural resources investigation has occurred within five percent of the project alignment.

Review of the aerial images and topographic maps did not identify any development within the project alignment. The aerials revealed that the project alignment follows Thompson Creek (San Jose Creek) that was channelized over the years. In addition, the BLM 1872 Plat map revealed Rancho San Jose overlaying portions of the project alignment.

5.2 PEDESTRIAN SURVEY RESULTS
A pedestrian survey of the project alignment was conducted on September 30, 2024. The entirety of the project alignment was surveyed. Approximately 10 percent of the project alignment is paved and/or built over, obstructing ground visibility. The project alignment’s overall ground visibility was moderate to very good, ranging between 70 to 100 percent. The disturbances within the project alignment were all modern which included plastic bags, beverage glass, plastic bottles, rusty metal, and concrete fencing fragments. Figures 5-1 through 5-2 depict representational photographs of the project alignment. Overall, the survey found no presence of anthropogenic soils (i.e., midden), hearth features, or concentrations of shell, bone, or lithic materials that would have indicated the presence of a precontact indigenous archaeological deposit. No cultural resources were discovered as a result of this survey.

5.3 POTENTIAL FOR BURIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL DEPOSITS
The surficial soil on the project alignment is classified as urban land, which exists in areas of high population density in the largely built environment (USDA 2024). These soils are a mix of several soils and nature human-transported or “fill” materials. Sediments within the project alignment consist of Quaternary aged deposits: Holocene (recent to 10,000 years old) and Pleistocene (10,000 to 2 million years old) marine and non-marine terrace deposits, to older Pliocene to Late Miocene (3.6 to 11.62 million years ago) marine basin deposits (Dibblee and Minch 2002). Late Pleistocene and Holocene deposits are generally considered more likely to contain precontact archaeological deposits. Landscape evolution and historic and modern development can impact the visibility of the archaeological record, but research has shown that archaeological sites tend to occur in specific geo-environmental settings (e.g., near reliable water sources and on stable land surfaces) rather than randomly throughout the landscape. For example, geoarchaeological studies have found that distance to water sources (e.g., stream, lake, spring) and landform slope (generally <18 percent) are two environmental variables that help accurately predict a location’s potential to contain buried archaeological deposits (e.g., Caltrans 2008; Caltrans 2010; Rosenthal and Meyer 2004a, 2004b). The topography of the terrain in the project alignment is relatively flat. However, the project alignment is disturbed with urban land fill material. Therefore, the geography, geology, soils, and topography across most of the project alignment suggests that the potential for the presence of intact buried deposits of cultural resources in the project alignment is very low.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
5-2 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
Source: Ascent Environmental in 2024.

Overview of the trail with landscaped ground surface. West view. Taken on September 30, 2024.

Source: Ascent Environmental in 2024.

Weber Street overview with paved ground surface. Northwest view. Taken on September 30, 2024.

Figure 5-1 Eastern Portion of Project Alignment
Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 5-3
Source: Ascent Environmental in 2024.

Trail exit along Ridgeway Street. East view. Taken on September 30, 2024.

Source: Ascent Environmental in 2023.

Overgrown vegetation obscures ground surface visibility. Werst view. Taken on September 30, 2024.

Figure 5-2 Western Portion of Project Alignment
Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
5-4 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
This page is intentionally left blank.

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 6-1
6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The background research, which includes the SCCIC record search, tribal outreach, and the pedestrian survey, did not result in the identification of unique archaeological sites or historical resources of an archaeological nature. In addition, the results of the geoarchaeological sensitivity analysis revealed that the project alignment has a very low sensitivity for intact buried archaeological resources.

The presence of, or the potential for the presence of tribal cultural resources as defined by PRC Section 21074, is not included in this study.

Although no cultural resources have been identified as a result of this cultural study, it is recommended that the following measures be implemented for the project.
 Inadvertent Discoveries: If archaeological materials are inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing activities, including midden soils, stone tools, chipped stone, baked clay, or concentrations of shell, bone, charcoal, glass, metal, or ceramics, all work shall cease within 100 feet (30.5 meters) of the find and the services of a professional archaeologist shall be retained immediately. At that time, the city of Pomona shall coordinate any necessary investigation of the site with the archaeologist as needed to evaluate the significance of the resource per PRC Section 5024.1 and 21083.2(g) and provide proper management recommendations. If the find is determined to be a historical resource and/or a unique archeological resource, contingency funding and a time allotment sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures and/or mitigation will be made available.

Possible management recommendations for significant resources could include resource avoidance or data recovery excavations. The contractor shall implement any measures deemed necessary by the archeologist for the protection of the cultural resources. Do not resume work in the area of the discovery until directed to do so by the archaeologist.

Discovery of human remains is not expected; however, if human remains should be discovered, the following measure should be implemented.
 Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains: If human remains are discovered during construction activities, work within 100 feet (30.5 meters) of the remains shall be stopped immediately, and the project proponent shall notify the Los Angeles County Coroner, in accordance with Section 5097.98 of the PRC and Section 7050.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined by the coroner to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC within 24 hours, and the NAHC will designate a Most Likely Descendant (MLD).

Together the land-owner and the MLD shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains in accordance with PRC Section 5097.94.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
6-2 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
This page is intentionally left blank.

Ascent Cultural Resources Inventory Report
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project 7-1
7 REFERENCES
Bureau of Land Management. 2024. General Land Office Records 1877. Available:
https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/survey/default.aspx?dm_id=291033&sid=1bj3txhc.0wl#surveyDetailsTabInd ex=1. Accessed on May 14, 2024.

BLM. See Bureau of Land Management.

California Department of Transportation. 2008 (April). A Geoarchaeological Overview and Assessment of Caltrans District 3. Prepared by Far Western Anthropological Group, Davis. ———. 2010. Volume I: A Geoarchaeological Overview and Assessment of Caltrans Districts 6 and 9 – Cultural Resources Inventory of Caltrans District 6/9 Rural Conventional Highways. Prepared by Jack Meyer, Craig Young, and Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, Far Western Anthropological Group, Davis.

Caltrans. See California Department of Transportation.

Cal Poly Pomona. 2024. Pomona Valley Historical Collection. Available on:
https://libguides.library.cpp.edu/c.php?g=771946&p=6014362#:~:text=The%20Pomona%20Valley%27s%20st ory%20began,for%20Pomona%20Valley%27s%20new%20residents. Accessed on November 5, 2024.

Dibblee, T.W. and J.A. Minch. 2002. Geologic Map of the San Dimas and Ontario quadrangles, Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, California. California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey.

Gabrielino-Tongva Indian Tribe. 2024. A California Indian Tribe know as San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians; Tribal History. Available on: https://gabrielinotribe.org/history/ Accessed on November 5, 2024.

Historic Resources Group. 2022. Historic Context Statement City of Pomona. Available on:
https://www.pomonaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/4968/638006698405330000 Accessed on November 4, 2024.

National Environmental Title Research, LLC. 2024. 1897 to 2021 United States Geological Survey Topographic Maps, and 1938 to 2020 Aerial Photographs of Project alignment. Available: http://www.historicaerials.com/.

Accessed May 14, 2024.

NETR. See National Environmental Title Research.

Rosenthal, J.S., and J. Meyer. 2004a. Landscape Evolution and the Archaeological Record: A Geoarchaeological Study of the Southern Santa Clara Valley and Surrounding Region. Center for Archaeological Research at Davis Publication No. 14. University of California, Davis.
———. 2004b. Cultural Resources Inventory of Caltrans District 10, Rural Conventional Highways. In Vol. III:

Geoarchaeological Study, Landscape Evolution and the Archaeological Record of Central California. Report prepared by Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Davis, California.

Tetra Tech. 2022. Cultural Resource Report 3730 Francis Avenue Battery Storage Project. San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for Capacity Power Group and ENGIE Distributed Storage Development LLC.

US Department of Agriculture. 2024. Web Soil Web. Available:
https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Accessed on May 14, 2024.

USDA. See United States Department of Agriculture.

Cultural Resources Inventory Report Ascent
Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
7-2 San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project
This page is intentionally left blank.

Appendix A
Record Search Results

Resource Detail: P-19-150397
P-19-150397
Identifying information
Primary No.:

Trinomial:

Attributes
General notes
Other IDs:

Recording events
Associated reports
Location information
County: Los Angeles
Address:

Database record metadata
Entered: 5/1/2008 jay
Last modified: 9/4/2019 sstjames
IC actions:

Date User
Collections: No
Management status
Cross-refs:

Disclosure: Unrestricted
Name: House for A E Packard
Resource type:

Age:

Information base:

Accession no(s):

Facility:

PLSS:

UTMs:

Record status: Verified
Building
Historic
Other
Attribute codes: HP02 (Single family property)
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Type Name
OHP Property Numb 092972
Resource Name House for A E Packard
Date Recorder(s) Affiliation Notes
10/8/1993 F. Smith Myra L Frank & Associates
Report No. Year Title Affiliation
1994 Historic Property Survey Report Provide High
Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Interstate 10
Between Sr 57/I-210 and the Los Angeles
County/San Bernardino County Line in Los
Angeles County 07-la-10-41.7/48.3
LA-03779 Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc.

Address City Assessor's parcel no. Zip code
1318 E Murchison Ave Pomona
Date User Action taken
5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database.

Resource Detail: P-19-150398
P-19-150398
Identifying information
Primary No.:

Trinomial:

Attributes
General notes
Other IDs:

Recording events
Associated reports
Location information
County: Los Angeles
Address:

Database record metadata
Entered: 5/1/2008 jay
Last modified: 9/4/2019 sstjames
IC actions:

Date User
Collections: No
Management status
Cross-refs:

Disclosure: Unrestricted
Name: 1304 N Hamilton Blvd
Resource type:

Age:

Information base:

Accession no(s):

Facility:

PLSS:

UTMs:

Record status: Verified
Building
Historic
Other
Attribute codes: HP02 (Single family property)
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Type Name
OHP Property Numb 092973
Resource Name 1304 N Hamilton Blvd
Date Recorder(s) Affiliation Notes
10/8/1993 F. Smith Myra L Frank & Associates
Report No. Year Title Affiliation
1994 Historic Property Survey Report Provide High
Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Interstate 10
Between Sr 57/I-210 and the Los Angeles
County/San Bernardino County Line in Los
Angeles County 07-la-10-41.7/48.3
LA-03779 Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc.

Address City Assessor's parcel no. Zip code
1304 N Hamilton Ave Pomona
Date User Action taken
5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database.

Resource Detail: P-19-150400
P-19-150400
Identifying information
Primary No.:

Trinomial:

Attributes
General notes
Other IDs:

Recording events
Associated reports
Location information
County: Los Angeles
Address:

Database record metadata
Entered: 5/1/2008 jay
Last modified: 9/4/2019 sstjames
IC actions:

Date User
Collections: No
Management status
Cross-refs:

Disclosure: Unrestricted
Name: House for Farell Fikel
Resource type:

Age:

Information base:

Accession no(s):

Facility:

PLSS:

UTMs:

Record status: Verified
Building
Historic
Other
Attribute codes: HP02 (Single family property)
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Type Name
OHP Property Numb 092975
Resource Name House for Farell Fikel
Date Recorder(s) Affiliation Notes
10/8/1993 F. Smith Myra L Frank & Associates
Report No. Year Title Affiliation
1994 Historic Property Survey Report Provide High
Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Interstate 10
Between Sr 57/I-210 and the Los Angeles
County/San Bernardino County Line in Los
Angeles County 07-la-10-41.7/48.3
LA-03779 Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc.
2007 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site
Visit Results for Royal Streel Communications,
Llc Candidate La2337a (i-10 at White), 875
West Orange Grove, Avenue, Pomona, Los
Angeles County, California
LA-08828 Michael Brandman Associates
Address City Assessor's parcel no. Zip code
1390 N Casa Vista Dr Pomona
Date User Action taken
5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database.

Resource Detail: P-19-188186
P-19-188186
Identifying information
Primary No.:

Trinomial:

Attributes
General notes
Other IDs:

Recording events
Associated reports
Location information
County: Los Angeles
Address:

Database record metadata
Entered: 9/2/2008 jay
Last modified: 9/4/2019 sstjames
IC actions:

Date User
Collections:

Management status
Cross-refs:

Disclosure: Unrestricted
Name: Pomona Church of the Brethren
Resource type:

Age:

Information base:

Accession no(s):

Facility:

PLSS:

UTMs:

Record status: Verified
Building
Historic
Other
Attribute codes: HP16 (Religious building)
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Type Name
Resource Name Pomona Church of the Brethren
Other Pomona Fellowship Church
Date Recorder(s) Affiliation Notes
3/8/2004 C.J. Hetzel
Address City Assessor's parcel no. Zip code
875 W Orange Grove Ave Pomona 8358-009-006 91768
Date User Action taken
9/2/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database (second round of additions)

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
P-19-150397 OHP Property Number - 092972;
Resource Name - House for A E
Packard
Building Historic HP02 1993 (F. Smith, Myra L Frank & LA-03779 Associates)
P-19-150398 OHP Property Number - 092973;
Resource Name - 1304 N
Hamilton Blvd
Building Historic HP02 1993 (F. Smith, Myra L Frank & LA-03779 Associates)
P-19-150400 OHP Property Number - 092975;
Resource Name - House for
Farell Fikel
Building Historic HP02 1993 (F. Smith, Myra L Frank & LA-03779, LA-08828 Associates)
P-19-188186 Resource Name - Pomona
Church of the Brethren;
Other - Pomona Fellowship
Church
Building Historic HP16 2004 (C.J. Hetzel)

Report Detail: LA-00279
Citation information
Year: 1981
Title: Archaeological/historical Survey Report on the Kellogg Plaza Site, Pomona, County of Los Angeles.

Affliliation: Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc.

No. pages: 12
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 3/12/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections:

Disclosure:

Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Whitney-Desautels, Nancy A.

Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-00279
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/12/2015 agarcia GIS QC

Report Detail: LA-00575
Citation information
Year: 1979
Title: An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the 40 Acre Extension of the Spadra Landfill, Pomona, Los Angeles County, Ca.

Affliliation: Beth Padon, Contract Archaeologist
No. pages: 8
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 3/13/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections: No
Disclosure: Not for publication
Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Padon, Beth
Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-00575
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/13/2015 agarcia GIS QC

Report Detail: LA-02932
Citation information
Year: 1993
Title: Negative Archaeological Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle (hov) Lanes on Interstate 10 (i-10) From the Junction of State Route 57 (sr 57/interstate 610 (i-210) in the City of Pomona to the Los Angeles/san Bernardino County Line 07-la-i10/p.m. 4
Affliliation: Historical, Environmental, Archaeological, Research, Team No. pages: 36
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 3/11/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections:

Disclosure:

Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Wlodarski, Robert J.

Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): ONTARIO, SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-02932
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/11/2015 agarcia GIS QC

Report Detail: LA-03306
Citation information
Year: 1993
Title: Historic Property Survey Report Interstate 10 HOV Widening Los Angeles County, California Caltrans District 7 Affliliation: Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc.

No. pages: 35
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 4/10/2023 aswitals
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections: No
Disclosure: Not for publication
Record status: Database Complete
Location information
Author(s): Whitney-Desautels, Nancy A. and Wayne H. Bonner Attributes: Archaeological, Architectural/Historical, Field study County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): BALDWIN PARK, SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-03306
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals: No
No. resources: 1
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/16/2015 agarcia GIS QC
4/3/2023 aswitals A.S.

Primary No. Trinomial Name
P-19-192856 Kellogg House; University House

Report Detail: LA-03779
Citation information
Year: 1994
Title: Historic Property Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Interstate 10 Between Sr 57/I-210 and the Los Angeles County/San Bernardino County Line in Los Angeles County 07-la-10-41.7/48.3 Affliliation: Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc.

No. pages: 132
Associated resources
General notes
Address:

Collections: No
Disclosure: Not for publication
Location information
Author(s): Smith, Francesca
Attributes: Archaeological, Architectural/Historical, Evaluation, Field study County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): ONTARIO, SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-03779
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals: No
No. resources: 12
PLSS:

Primary No. Trinomial Name
P-19-150397 House for A E Packard
P-19-150398 1304 N Hamilton Blvd
P-19-150399 Speculative House for C P Stens
P-19-150400 House for Farell Fikel
P-19-150401 House for C P Stensgard
P-19-150402 Joe Wilkins House
P-19-150403 465 E Kenoak Pl
P-19-150404 493 E Kenoak Pl
P-19-150405 J R Wilson House
P-19-150406 1355 N Park Ave
P-19-150407 B F Hendricks House
P-19-150408 Dr Cordellia M Richmond Reside
Year: 1993
Title: Negative Archaeological Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes on Interstate 10 (I-10) From the Junction of State Route 57 (SR-57 / Interstate 610 (I-210)) in the City of Pomona to the Los Angeles / San Bernardino County Line 07-LA-110/P.M. 41.7/48.3
Affiliation: Historical, Environmental, Archaeological, Research, Team No. pages: 3
Inventory size:

Collections: No
Disclosure: Not for publication
Author(s): Wlodarski, Robert J.

Report type(s): Archaeological, Field study
Sub-desig.:

PDF Pages: 19-21

Report Detail: LA-03779
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 2/26/2024 aswitals
IC actions:

Date User
Record status: Database Complete
Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/11/2015 agarcia GIS QC
2/26/2024 aswitals A.S.

Report Detail: LA-04835
Citation information
Year: 1999
Title: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for Williams Communications, Inc. Proposed Fiber Optic Cable System Installation Project, Los Angeles to Riverside, Los Angeles and Riverside Counties Affliliation: Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc.

No. pages: 79
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 3/11/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections:

Disclosure:

Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Ashkar, Shahira
Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): BALDWIN PARK, EL MONTE, HOLLYWOOD, LA HABRA, LOS ANGELES, ONTARIO, SAN DIMAS, SOUTH GATE,

WHITTIER, YORBA LINDA
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-04835
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 3
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/11/2015 agarcia GIS QC
Primary No. Trinomial Name
P-19-186109 VOID
P-19-186112 Union Pacific RR, Southern Paci
P-19-187090 E Los Angeles RR Station

Report Detail: LA-05643
Citation information
Year: 2002
Title: Cultural Resource Assessment: Cingular Wireless Facility No. Sb 148-01 Los Angeles County Affliliation: LSA Associates, Inc.

No. pages: 8
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 3/18/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections:

Disclosure:

Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Duke, Curt
Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-05643
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 1
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/18/2015 agarcia GIS QC
Primary No. Trinomial Name
P-19-186112 Union Pacific RR, Southern Paci
Type Name
Cellular

Report Detail: LA-05925
Citation information
Year: 1994
Title: Historic Property Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Interstate 10 Sr57/i-210 and the Los Angeles County/san Bernardino County Lines in Los Angeles 07-la-10-41.7/48.3 Affliliation: Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc.

No. pages: 15
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 3/11/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections:

Disclosure:

Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Smith, Francesca
Attributes: Other research
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): ONTARIO, SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-05925
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/11/2015 agarcia GIS QC

Report Detail: LA-06260
Citation information
Year: 2002
Title: Cultural Resource Assessment at & T Wireless Services Facility No. D293c Los Angeles County, California Affliliation: LSA Associates, Inc.

No. pages: 9
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 3/19/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections:

Disclosure:

Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Duke, Curt
Attributes: Literature search
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-06260
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/19/2015 agarcia GIS QC
Type Name
Cellular

Report Detail: LA-08828
Citation information
Year: 2007
Title: Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for Royal Streel Communications, Llc Candidate La2337a (i10 at White), 875 West Orange Grove, Avenue, Pomona, Los Angeles County, California Affliliation: Michael Brandman Associates
No. pages: 12
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 3/23/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections:

Disclosure:

Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Bonner, Wayne H.

Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-08828
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 3
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/23/2015 agarcia GIS QC
Primary No. Trinomial Name
P-19-150348 726 Maine Ave
P-19-150400 House for Farell Fikel
P-19-150401 House for C P Stensgard
Type Name
Cellular

Report Detail: LA-09079
Citation information
Year: 2004
Title: Records Search Results and Site Visit for Sprint Telecommunications Facility Candidate La60xc010a (brethren Church) 875 West Orange Grove Avenue, Pomona, Los Angeles County, California Affliliation: Michael Brandman Associates
No. pages: 10
Database record metadata
Entered: 5/5/2008 jay
Last modified: 3/23/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections:

Disclosure:

Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Bonner, Wayne H. and Christeen Taniguchi
Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-09079
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 3/23/2015 agarcia GIS QC
Address City Assessor's parcel no. Zip code
875 West Orange Grove Avenue Pomona
Type Name
Cellular

Report Detail: LA-10190
Citation information
Year: 2002
Title: Supplemental Historic Property Survey Report for the I-10 HOV Lane Between I-605 and the SR-57/SR-71/I-210 Interchange in the Cities of Los Angeles, Baldwin Park, West Covina, Covina, San Dimas, and Pomona in Los Angeles County, CA
Affliliation: Caltrans
No. pages: 82
Associated resources
General notes
Collections: No
Disclosure: Not for publication
Author(s): Harbert, Claudia
Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-10190
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Primary No. Trinomial Name
P-19-188913
P-19-188914
P-19-188915
P-19-188916
P-19-188917
P-19-188918
P-19-188919
P-19-188920 Burl Watson Realty Inc
P-19-188921
P-19-188922
P-19-188923
P-19-188924
P-19-188925
P-19-188926 The Aristocrat Motel
P-19-188927 Taxcos Restaurant
P-19-188928 Nextel
P-19-188929
P-19-188930
P-19-188931
P-19-188932
P-19-188933
P-19-188934
P-19-188935
P-19-188936 Tract #15527
P-19-188937 2231 W Mossberg Ave
P-19-188938 West Covina Dental
P-19-188939 2101 W Garvey Ave N
P-19-188940 1647-1649 W Garvey Ave
P-19-188941 Trophy Center
P-19-188942 1618 W Harbert St
P-19-188943 Catholic Resource Center
P-19-188944 1415 W Garvey Ave
P-19-188945 117 N Ellen Dr
P-19-188946 118 N Morada Ave
P-19-188947 118 N Maplewood Ave

Report Detail: LA-10190
Database record metadata
Entered: 2/3/2010 agarcia
Last modified: 3/23/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Date User
Address:

Record status:

Location information
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): BALDWIN PARK, SAN DIMAS
Has informals:

No. resources: 70
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
3/23/2015 agarcia GIS QC
P-19-188948 1038 E Mardina St
P-19-188949 1042 E Mardina St
P-19-188950 1046 E Mardina St
P-19-188951 Tract #16738
P-19-188952 Dental Office
P-19-188953 104 S Glendora Ave
P-19-188954 105 S Gardenglen St
P-19-188955 106 S Gardenglen St
P-19-188956 106 S Astell Ave
P-19-188957 Tract #16472
P-19-188958 104 S Turner Ave
P-19-188959 103 S Robin Rd
P-19-188960 102 S Cherrywood St
P-19-188961 101 S Fernwood St
P-19-188962 102 S Fernwood St
P-19-188963 107 S Homerest Ave
P-19-188964 118 S Homerest Ave
P-19-188965 Tract # 17547
P-19-188966 106 S Baymar St
P-19-188967 Villa Tepeyac Mexican Restaura
P-19-188968 101 S Fircroft St
P-19-188969 2330 E Garvey Ave S
P-19-188970 2346 E Garvey Ave S
P-19-188971 2451 E Garvey Ave N
P-19-188972 Tract # 19682
P-19-188973 Tract # 17045
P-19-188974 3712 E Holt Ave
P-19-188975
P-19-188976
P-19-188977
P-19-188978
P-19-188979
P-19-188980
P-19-188981
P-19-188982

Report Detail: LA-10561
Citation information
Year: 2001
Title: Negative Archaeological Survey Report - Highway Project Description, State Route 71 Affliliation: Caltrans
No. pages: 4
Database record metadata
Entered: 8/24/2010 agarcia
Last modified: 3/12/2015 agarcia
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections: No
Disclosure: Not for publication
Record status:

Location information
Author(s): Sylvia, Barbara
Attributes: Archaeological, Field study
County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): ONTARIO, SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-10561
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
3/12/2015 agarcia GIS QC

Report Detail: LA-11119
Citation information
Year: 2010
Title: Construction of Innovation Way, Innovation Village Research Park, Pomona, CA Affliliation: Cal Poly Pomona Foundation
No. pages: 24
Database record metadata
Entered: 10/6/2011 lnoyes
Last modified: 9/14/2023 aswitals
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections: No
Disclosure: Not for publication
Record status: Database Complete
Location information
Author(s): Vaughan-Acton, Sandra
Attributes: Archaeological, Architectural/historical, Other research County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Inventory size: QC
No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-11119
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals: No
No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Date User Action taken
3/24/2015 agarcia GIS QC
9/14/2023 aswitals A.S.

Address City Assessor's parcel no. Zip code
Innovation Way Pomona, CA

Report Detail: LA-12978
Citation information
Year: 2015
Title: Cultural Resources Investigation for Trileaf 611939 Verizon “Lyndale” 900 Corporate Center Drive, Pomona, Los Angeles County, California 91768
Affliliation: Archaeological Resources Technology
No. pages: 7
Database record metadata
Entered: 10/25/2016 ikott
Last modified: 10/25/2016 ikott
IC actions:

Associated resources
General notes
Date User
Address:

Collections: No
Disclosure: Not for publication
Record status: Database Complete
Location information
Author(s): Losee, Carolyn
Attributes: Archaeological, Architectural/Historical, Field study County(ies): Los Angeles
USGS quad(s): SAN DIMAS
Inventory size:

No. maps:

Identifiers
Report No.: LA-12978
Other IDs:

Cross-refs:

Has informals:

No. resources: 0
PLSS:

Address City Assessor's parcel no. Zip code
900 Corporate Center Drive Pomona 8707-001-052 91768

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources LA-00279 1981 Archaeological/historical Survey Report on the Kellogg Plaza Site, Pomona, County of
Los Angeles.

Scientific Resource
Surveys, Inc.

Whitney-Desautels,
Nancy A.

LA-00575 1979 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the 40 Acre Extension of the Spadra Landfill,
Pomona, Los Angeles County, Ca.

Beth Padon, Contract
Archaeologist
Padon, Beth
LA-02932 1993 Negative Archaeological Survey Report
Provide High Occupancy Vehicle (hov) Lanes
on Interstate 10 (i-10) From the Junction of
State Route 57 (sr 57/interstate 610 (i-210) in
the City of Pomona to the Los Angeles/san
Bernardino County Line 07-la-i10/p.m. 4
Historical, Environmental,
Archaeological, Research,
Team
Wlodarski, Robert J.

LA-03306 1993 Historic Property Survey Report Interstate 10 HOV Widening Los Angeles County,
California Caltrans District 7
Scientific Resource
Surveys, Inc.

Whitney-Desautels,
Nancy A. and Wayne H.

Bonner
19-192856
LA-03779 1994 Historic Property Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Interstate 10
Between Sr 57/I-210 and the Los Angeles
County/San Bernardino County Line in Los
Angeles County 07-la-10-41.7/48.3
Myra L. Frank &
Associates, Inc.

Smith, Francesca 19-150397, 19-150398, 19-150399,
19-150400, 19-150401, 19-150402,
19-150403, 19-150404, 19-150405,
19-150406, 19-150407, 19-150408
LA-03779 1993 Negative Archaeological Survey Report
Provide High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
Lanes on Interstate 10 (I-10) From the
Junction of State Route 57 (SR-57 / Interstate
610 (I-210)) in the City of Pomona to the Los
Angeles / San Bernardino County Line 07-LA110/P.M. 41.7/48.3 Historical, Environmental,
Archaeological, Research,
Team
Wlodarski, Robert J.

LA-04835 1999 Cultural Resources Inventory Report for
Williams Communications, Inc. Proposed
Fiber Optic Cable System Installation Project,
Los Angeles to Riverside, Los Angeles and
Riverside Counties
Jones & Stokes Associates,
Inc.

Ashkar, Shahira 19-186109, 19-186112, 19-187090
LA-05643 2002 Cultural Resource Assessment: Cingular
Wireless Facility No. Sb 148-01 Los Angeles
County
Cellular - Duke, Curt LSA Associates, Inc. 19-186112
LA-05925 1994 Historic Property Survey Report Provide High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Interstate 10
Sr57/i-210 and the Los Angeles County/san
Bernardino County Lines in Los Angeles 07-
la-10-41.7/48.3
Myra L. Frank &
Associates, Inc.

Smith, Francesca

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources LA-06260 2002 Cultural Resource Assessment at & T
Wireless Services Facility No. D293c Los
Angeles County, California
Cellular - Duke, Curt LSA Associates, Inc.

LA-08828 2007 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for Royal Streel
Communications, Llc Candidate La2337a (i10 at White), 875 West Orange Grove, Avenue, Pomona, Los Angeles County,
California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Cellular - Bonner, Wayne H. 19-150348, 19-150400, 19-150401 LA-09079 2004 Records Search Results and Site Visit for Sprint Telecommunications Facility Candidate
La60xc010a (brethren Church) 875 West
Orange Grove Avenue, Pomona, Los Angeles
County, California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne H. and
Christeen Taniguchi
Cellular -
LA-10190 2002 Supplemental Historic Property Survey
Report for the I-10 HOV Lane Between I-605
and the SR-57/SR-71/I-210 Interchange in
the Cities of Los Angeles, Baldwin Park,
West Covina, Covina, San Dimas, and
Pomona in Los Angeles County, CA
Harbert, Claudia Caltrans 19-188913, 19-188914, 19-188915, 19-188916, 19-188917, 19-188918,
19-188919, 19-188920, 19-188921,
19-188922, 19-188923, 19-188924,
19-188925, 19-188926, 19-188927,
19-188928, 19-188929, 19-188930,
19-188931, 19-188932, 19-188933,
19-188934, 19-188935, 19-188936,
19-188937, 19-188938, 19-188939,
19-188940, 19-188941, 19-188942,
19-188943, 19-188944, 19-188945,
19-188946, 19-188947, 19-188948,
19-188949, 19-188950, 19-188951,
19-188952, 19-188953, 19-188954,
19-188955, 19-188956, 19-188957,
19-188958, 19-188959, 19-188960,
19-188961, 19-188962, 19-188963,
19-188964, 19-188965, 19-188966,
19-188967, 19-188968, 19-188969,
19-188970, 19-188971, 19-188972,
19-188973, 19-188974, 19-188975,
19-188976, 19-188977, 19-188978,
19-188979, 19-188980, 19-188981,
19-188982
LA-10561 2001 Negative Archaeological Survey Report -
Highway Project Description, State Route 71
Sylvia, Barbara Caltrans
LA-11119 2010 Construction of Innovation Way, Innovation Village Research Park, Pomona, CA
Cal Poly Pomona
Foundation
Vaughan-Acton, Sandra

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources LA-12978 2015 Cultural Resources Investigation for Trileaf 611939 Verizon “Lyndale” 900 Corporate
Center Drive, Pomona, Los Angeles County,
California 91768
Archaeological Resources
Technology
Losee, Carolyn

Appendix B
Tribal Correspondence

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

May 31, 2024
Roberto Mora
Ascent Environmental
Via Email to: [email protected]
Re: 20220001.01 City of Pomona SJC Bikeway Project, Los Angeles County To Whom It May Concern:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information submitted for the above referenced project. The results were positive. Please contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation on the attached list for information. Please note that tribes do not always record their sacred sites in the SLF, nor are they required to do so. A SLF search is not a substitute for consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with a project’s geographic area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites, such as the appropriate regional California Historical Research Information System (CHRIS) archaeological Information Center for the presence of recorded archaeological sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. Please contact all of those listed; if they cannot supply information, they may recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,
Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

VICE-CHAIRPERSON
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

COMMISSIONER
Laurena Bolden
Serrano

COMMISSIONER
Reid Milanovich
Cahuilla

COMMISSIONER
Bennae Calac
Pauma-Yuima Band of
Luiseño Indians

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Raymond C.

Hitchcock
Miwok, Nisenan

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
Tribe Name Fed (F)
Non-Fed (N)
Contact Person Contact Address Phone # Fax # Email Address Cultural Affiliation
Last
Updated
Gabrieleno Band of Mission
Indians - Kizh Nation
N Andrew Salas, Chairperson P.O. Box 393
Covina, CA, 91723
(844) 390-0787 [email protected] Gabrieleno 8/18/2023 Gabrieleno Band of Mission
Indians - Kizh Nation
N Christina Swindall Martinez,
Secretary
P.O. Box 393
Covina, CA, 91723
(844) 390-0787 [email protected] Gabrieleno 8/18/2023 Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel
Band of Mission Indians
N Anthony Morales, Chairperson P.O. Box 693
San Gabriel, CA, 91778
(626) 483-3564 (626) 286-1262 [email protected] Gabrieleno 12/4/2023 Gabrielino Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
N Christina Conley, Cultural
Resource Administrator
P.O. Box 941078
Simi Valley, CA, 93094
(626) 407-8761 [email protected]
du
Gabrielino 3/16/2023
Gabrielino Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
N Robert Dorame, Chairperson P.O. Box 490
Bellflower, CA, 90707
(562) 761-6417 (562) 761-6417 [email protected] Gabrielino 3/16/2023 Gabrielino/Tongva Nation N Sandonne Goad, Chairperson 106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St., #231
Los Angeles, CA, 90012
(951) 807-0479 [email protected] Gabrielino 3/28/2023 Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe N Sam Dunlap, Cultural Resource Director
P.O. Box 3919
Seal Beach, CA, 90740
(909) 262-9351 [email protected] Gabrielino 5/30/2023 Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe N Charles Alvarez, Chairperson 23454 Vanowen Street West Hills, CA, 91307
(310) 403-6048 [email protected] Gabrielino 5/30/2023 Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians
F Steven Estrada, Tribal Chairman P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA, 92539
(951) 659-2700 (951) 659-2228 [email protected] Cahuilla 4/8/2024 Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians
F Vanessa Minott, Tribal
Administrator
P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA, 92539
(951) 659-2700 (951) 659-2228 [email protected] Cahuilla 4/8/2024 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians F Jessica Valdez, Cultural Resource Specialist
P.O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
(951) 663-6261 (951) 654-4198 [email protected] Cahuilla Luiseno
7/14/2023
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians F Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson P.O. Box 487 San Jacinto, CA, 92581
(951) 654-5544 (951) 654-4198 [email protected] Cahuilla Luiseno
7/14/2023
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians F Joseph Ontiveros, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
P.O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
(951) 663-5279 (951) 654-4198 [email protected] Cahuilla Luiseno
7/14/2023
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed 20220001.01 City of Pomona SJC Bikeway Project, Los Angeles County.

Record: PROJ2024-002820
Report Type:

List of Tribes
Counties: Los
Imperial,Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside,
San Bernardino,San Diego
Imperial,Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside,
San Bernardino,San Diego
Imperial,Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside,
San Bernardino,San Diego
Imperial,Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside,
San Bernardino,San Diego
Imperial,Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside,
San Bernardino,San Diego
Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside, San
Bernardino,Santa Barbara,Ventura
Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside, San
Bernardino,Santa Barbara,Ventura
Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside, San
Bernardino,Santa Barbara,Ventura
Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside, San
Bernardino,Santa Barbara,Ventura
Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside, San
Bernardino,Santa Barbara,Ventura
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Los Angeles County
5/31/2024
Counties
Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside, San
Bernardino,Santa Barbara,Ventura
Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside, San
Bernardino,Santa Barbara,Ventura
Los Angeles,Orange,Riverside, San
Bernardino,Santa Barbara,Ventura
05/31/2024 09:07 PM
1 of 1
T001S R008W
T001S R009W
17 16 15 14 13 18
20 19
21 22 23 24 20
29 30
29 28 27 26 25
31 32 33 34 35 36 32
17 Source: adapted by Ascent in 2024 5/10/2024
DRAFT Project Site Topo
Project Site
USGS 7.5-min Topo Quads (2021): Ontario, San Dimas
20220001.01 GIS 007
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
From: Roberto Mora
To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Request for information - San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project Date: Monday, October 14, 2024 9:34:00 AM
Attachments: 20220001_01_GIS_007_Project_Site_Topo.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Greetings!
I am contacting you today as part of the cultural resources background investigation for the San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project, Pomona, Los Angeles County. Ascent has been retained to conduct the cultural resources survey and technical report and this contact is concerning that effort.

Project Description
The City of Pomona (City) is proposing the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project (proposed project), which consists of the development of a 3.5-mile off-road bike and pedestrian greenway along a segment of San Jose Creek between Temple Avenue and Murchison Avenue in Pomona, California. The proposed project is identified as a Tier 1 priority project in the City’s Active Transportation Plan; it is envisioned to provide pedestrians and bicyclists a safer off-street path of travel between community destinations and amenities in the city, which include the California Polytechnic University at Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), the Los Angeles County Fairplex, regional transit and bikeway connections, various parks and schools, and commercial shopping centers. The project would consist of 15 access points, including 6 at-grade street crossings. The project would also feature stormwater capture treatments, trailhead gateways and access points, wayfinding and safety signage, and at-grade safe street crossings along the 3.5-mile greenway alignment.

Previous Investigations
A record search has been conducted at the South-Central Coastal Information Center and a pedestrian survey was completed on September 30, 2024. No precontact archaeological resources have been previously identified within the project site and the survey was negative for the presence of indications of indigenous archaeological resources. The SLF search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) returned positive. The cultural resources report is still in progress.

Request for Information
The NAHC has identified you as someone who may have information concerning cultural resources of tribal concern which may be present in the project site. If you have any knowledge of such resources within the project site, and are willing to share their nature and location, please let me know so I can include them in the cultural report. All information provided regarding specific sites or Native American cultural resources will remain confidential. My contact information is provided below.

Thank you much for your time and attention,
Roberto Mora, RPA
Archaeologist
Pronouns: he/him/his
D 916.732.3328 | M 916.330.0624
[email protected]
Ascent
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
O 916.444.7301
Note: My email address has changed, please
update your address book.

From: Vanessa Minott
To: Roberto Mora
Subject: RE: Request for information - San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2024 7:39:20 AM
Attachments: image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
Acha’i Tamit,
Thank you for reaching out to Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians. We defer any comments to Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians cultural resource department.

Respectfully,
Vanessa Minott,
Tribal Administrator
Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians
P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA 92539
951-659-2700 ext. 102
760-668-0460 work cell
From: Roberto Mora <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 9:35 AM
To: Steven Estrada <[email protected]>; Vanessa Minott <[email protected]> Subject: [External] Request for information - San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project Greetings!
I am contacting you today as part of the cultural resources background investigation for the San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project, Pomona, Los Angeles County. Ascent has been retained to conduct the cultural resources survey and technical report and this contact is concerning that effort.

Project Description
The City of Pomona (City) is proposing the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project (proposed project), which consists of the development of a 3.5-mile off-road bike and pedestrian greenway along a segment of San Jose Creek between Temple Avenue and Murchison Avenue in Pomona, California. The proposed project is identified as a Tier 1 priority project in the City’s Active Transportation Plan; it is envisioned to provide pedestrians and bicyclists a safer off-street path of travel between community destinations and amenities in the city, which include the California Polytechnic University at Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), the Los Angeles County Fairplex, regional transit and bikeway connections, various parks and schools, and commercial shopping centers. The project would consist of 15 access points, including 6 at-grade street crossings. The project would also feature stormwater capture treatments, trailhead gateways and access points, wayfinding and safety signage, and at-grade safe street crossings along the 3.5-mile greenway alignment.

Previous Investigations
A record search has been conducted at the South-Central Coastal Information Center and a pedestrian survey was completed on September 30, 2024. No precontact archaeological resources have been previously identified within the project site and the survey was negative for the presence of indications of indigenous archaeological resources. The SLF search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) returned positive. The cultural resources report is still in progress.

Request for Information
The NAHC has identified you as someone who may have information concerning cultural resources of tribal concern which may be present in the project site. If you have any knowledge of such resources within the project site, and are willing to share their nature and location, please let me know so I can include them in the cultural report. All information provided regarding specific sites or Native American cultural resources will remain confidential. My contact information is provided below.

Thank you much for your time and attention,
Roberto Mora, RPA
Archaeologist
Pronouns: he/him/his
D 916.732.3328 | M 916.330.0624
[email protected]
Ascent
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
O 916.444.7301
Note: My email address has changed, please
update your address book.

From: Roberto Mora
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Request for information - San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project Date: Monday, October 14, 2024 9:35:00 AM
Attachments: 20220001_01_GIS_007_Project_Site_Topo.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Greetings!
I am contacting you today as part of the cultural resources background investigation for the San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project, Pomona, Los Angeles County. Ascent has been retained to conduct the cultural resources survey and technical report and this contact is concerning that effort.

Project Description
The City of Pomona (City) is proposing the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project (proposed project), which consists of the development of a 3.5-mile off-road bike and pedestrian greenway along a segment of San Jose Creek between Temple Avenue and Murchison Avenue in Pomona, California. The proposed project is identified as a Tier 1 priority project in the City’s Active Transportation Plan; it is envisioned to provide pedestrians and bicyclists a safer off-street path of travel between community destinations and amenities in the city, which include the California Polytechnic University at Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), the Los Angeles County Fairplex, regional transit and bikeway connections, various parks and schools, and commercial shopping centers. The project would consist of 15 access points, including 6 at-grade street crossings. The project would also feature stormwater capture treatments, trailhead gateways and access points, wayfinding and safety signage, and at-grade safe street crossings along the 3.5-mile greenway alignment.

Previous Investigations
A record search has been conducted at the South-Central Coastal Information Center and a pedestrian survey was completed on September 30, 2024. No precontact archaeological resources have been previously identified within the project site and the survey was negative for the presence of indications of indigenous archaeological resources. The SLF search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) returned positive. The cultural resources report is still in progress.

Request for Information
The NAHC has identified you as someone who may have information concerning cultural resources of tribal concern which may be present in the project site. If you have any knowledge of such resources within the project site, and are willing to share their nature and location, please let me know so I can include them in the cultural report. All information provided regarding specific sites or Native American cultural resources will remain confidential. My contact information is provided below.

Thank you much for your time and attention,
Roberto Mora, RPA
Archaeologist
Pronouns: he/him/his
D 916.732.3328 | M 916.330.0624
[email protected]
Ascent
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
O 916.444.7301
Note: My email address has changed, please
update your address book.

From: Roberto Mora
To: "[email protected]"; [email protected] Subject: Request for information - San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project Date: Monday, October 14, 2024 9:30:00 AM
Attachments: 20220001_01_GIS_007_Project_Site_Topo.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Greetings!
I am contacting you today as part of the cultural resources background investigation for the San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project, Pomona, Los Angeles County. Ascent has been retained to conduct the cultural resources survey and technical report and this contact is concerning that effort.

Project Description
The City of Pomona (City) is proposing the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project (proposed project), which consists of the development of a 3.5-mile off-road bike and pedestrian greenway along a segment of San Jose Creek between Temple Avenue and Murchison Avenue in Pomona, California. The proposed project is identified as a Tier 1 priority project in the City’s Active Transportation Plan; it is envisioned to provide pedestrians and bicyclists a safer off-street path of travel between community destinations and amenities in the city, which include the California Polytechnic University at Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), the Los Angeles County Fairplex, regional transit and bikeway connections, various parks and schools, and commercial shopping centers. The project would consist of 15 access points, including 6 at-grade street crossings. The project would also feature stormwater capture treatments, trailhead gateways and access points, wayfinding and safety signage, and at-grade safe street crossings along the 3.5-mile greenway alignment.

Previous Investigations
A record search has been conducted at the South-Central Coastal Information Center and a pedestrian survey was completed on September 30, 2024. No precontact archaeological resources have been previously identified within the project site and the survey was negative for the presence of indications of indigenous archaeological resources. The SLF search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) returned positive. The cultural resources report is still in progress.

Request for Information
The NAHC has identified you as someone who may have information concerning cultural resources of tribal concern which may be present in the project site. If you have any knowledge of such resources within the project site, and are willing to share their nature and location, please let me know so I can include them in the cultural report. All information provided regarding specific sites or Native American cultural resources will remain confidential. My contact information is provided below.

Thank you much for your time and attention,
Roberto Mora, RPA
Archaeologist
Pronouns: he/him/his
D 916.732.3328 | M 916.330.0624
[email protected]
Ascent
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
O 916.444.7301
Note: My email address has changed, please
update your address book.

From: Roberto Mora
To: [email protected]
Subject: Request for information - San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project Date: Monday, October 14, 2024 9:29:00 AM
Attachments: 20220001_01_GIS_007_Project_Site_Topo.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Greetings!
I am contacting you today as part of the cultural resources background investigation for the San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project, Pomona, Los Angeles County. Ascent has been retained to conduct the cultural resources survey and technical report and this contact is concerning that effort.

Project Description
The City of Pomona (City) is proposing the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project (proposed project), which consists of the development of a 3.5-mile off-road bike and pedestrian greenway along a segment of San Jose Creek between Temple Avenue and Murchison Avenue in Pomona, California. The proposed project is identified as a Tier 1 priority project in the City’s Active Transportation Plan; it is envisioned to provide pedestrians and bicyclists a safer off-street path of travel between community destinations and amenities in the city, which include the California Polytechnic University at Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), the Los Angeles County Fairplex, regional transit and bikeway connections, various parks and schools, and commercial shopping centers. The project would consist of 15 access points, including 6 at-grade street crossings. The project would also feature stormwater capture treatments, trailhead gateways and access points, wayfinding and safety signage, and at-grade safe street crossings along the 3.5-mile greenway alignment.

Previous Investigations
A record search has been conducted at the South-Central Coastal Information Center and a pedestrian survey was completed on September 30, 2024. No precontact archaeological resources have been previously identified within the project site and the survey was negative for the presence of indications of indigenous archaeological resources. The SLF search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) returned positive. The cultural resources report is still in progress.

Request for Information
The NAHC has identified you as someone who may have information concerning cultural resources of tribal concern which may be present in the project site. If you have any knowledge of such resources within the project site, and are willing to share their nature and location, please let me know so I can include them in the cultural report. All information provided regarding specific sites or Native American cultural resources will remain confidential. My contact information is provided below.

Thank you much for your time and attention,
Roberto Mora, RPA
Archaeologist
Pronouns: he/him/his
D 916.732.3328 | M 916.330.0624
[email protected]
Ascent
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
O 916.444.7301
Note: My email address has changed, please
update your address book.

From: Roberto Mora
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Request for information - San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project Date: Monday, October 14, 2024 9:34:00 AM
Attachments: 20220001_01_GIS_007_Project_Site_Topo.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Greetings!
I am contacting you today as part of the cultural resources background investigation for the San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project, Pomona, Los Angeles County. Ascent has been retained to conduct the cultural resources survey and technical report and this contact is concerning that effort.

Project Description
The City of Pomona (City) is proposing the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project (proposed project), which consists of the development of a 3.5-mile off-road bike and pedestrian greenway along a segment of San Jose Creek between Temple Avenue and Murchison Avenue in Pomona, California. The proposed project is identified as a Tier 1 priority project in the City’s Active Transportation Plan; it is envisioned to provide pedestrians and bicyclists a safer off-street path of travel between community destinations and amenities in the city, which include the California Polytechnic University at Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), the Los Angeles County Fairplex, regional transit and bikeway connections, various parks and schools, and commercial shopping centers. The project would consist of 15 access points, including 6 at-grade street crossings. The project would also feature stormwater capture treatments, trailhead gateways and access points, wayfinding and safety signage, and at-grade safe street crossings along the 3.5-mile greenway alignment.

Previous Investigations
A record search has been conducted at the South-Central Coastal Information Center and a pedestrian survey was completed on September 30, 2024. No precontact archaeological resources have been previously identified within the project site and the survey was negative for the presence of indications of indigenous archaeological resources. The SLF search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) returned positive. The cultural resources report is still in progress.

Request for Information
The NAHC has identified you as someone who may have information concerning cultural resources of tribal concern which may be present in the project site. If you have any knowledge of such resources within the project site, and are willing to share their nature and location, please let me know so I can include them in the cultural report. All information provided regarding specific sites or Native American cultural resources will remain confidential. My contact information is provided below.

Thank you much for your time and attention,
Roberto Mora, RPA
Archaeologist
Pronouns: he/him/his
D 916.732.3328 | M 916.330.0624
[email protected]
Ascent
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
O 916.444.7301
Note: My email address has changed, please
update your address book.

From: Roberto Mora
To: [email protected]
Subject: Request for information - San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project Date: Monday, October 14, 2024 9:33:00 AM
Attachments: 20220001_01_GIS_007_Project_Site_Topo.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Greetings!
I am contacting you today as part of the cultural resources background investigation for the San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project, Pomona, Los Angeles County. Ascent has been retained to conduct the cultural resources survey and technical report and this contact is concerning that effort.

Project Description
The City of Pomona (City) is proposing the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project (proposed project), which consists of the development of a 3.5-mile off-road bike and pedestrian greenway along a segment of San Jose Creek between Temple Avenue and Murchison Avenue in Pomona, California. The proposed project is identified as a Tier 1 priority project in the City’s Active Transportation Plan; it is envisioned to provide pedestrians and bicyclists a safer off-street path of travel between community destinations and amenities in the city, which include the California Polytechnic University at Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), the Los Angeles County Fairplex, regional transit and bikeway connections, various parks and schools, and commercial shopping centers. The project would consist of 15 access points, including 6 at-grade street crossings. The project would also feature stormwater capture treatments, trailhead gateways and access points, wayfinding and safety signage, and at-grade safe street crossings along the 3.5-mile greenway alignment.

Previous Investigations
A record search has been conducted at the South-Central Coastal Information Center and a pedestrian survey was completed on September 30, 2024. No precontact archaeological resources have been previously identified within the project site and the survey was negative for the presence of indications of indigenous archaeological resources. The SLF search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) returned positive. The cultural resources report is still in progress.

Request for Information
The NAHC has identified you as someone who may have information concerning cultural resources of tribal concern which may be present in the project site. If you have any knowledge of such resources within the project site, and are willing to share their nature and location, please let me know so I can include them in the cultural report. All information provided regarding specific sites or Native American cultural resources will remain confidential. My contact information is provided below.

Thank you much for your time and attention,
Roberto Mora, RPA
Archaeologist
Pronouns: he/him/his
D 916.732.3328 | M 916.330.0624
[email protected]
Ascent
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
O 916.444.7301
Note: My email address has changed, please
update your address book.

From: Roberto Mora
To: [email protected]
Subject: Request for information - San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project Date: Monday, October 14, 2024 9:29:00 AM
Attachments: 20220001_01_GIS_007_Project_Site_Topo.pdf
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Greetings!
I am contacting you today as part of the cultural resources background investigation for the San Jose Multi-Use Bikeway Project, Pomona, Los Angeles County. Ascent has been retained to conduct the cultural resources survey and technical report and this contact is concerning that effort.

Project Description
The City of Pomona (City) is proposing the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project (proposed project), which consists of the development of a 3.5-mile off-road bike and pedestrian greenway along a segment of San Jose Creek between Temple Avenue and Murchison Avenue in Pomona, California. The proposed project is identified as a Tier 1 priority project in the City’s Active Transportation Plan; it is envisioned to provide pedestrians and bicyclists a safer off-street path of travel between community destinations and amenities in the city, which include the California Polytechnic University at Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona), the Los Angeles County Fairplex, regional transit and bikeway connections, various parks and schools, and commercial shopping centers. The project would consist of 15 access points, including 6 at-grade street crossings. The project would also feature stormwater capture treatments, trailhead gateways and access points, wayfinding and safety signage, and at-grade safe street crossings along the 3.5-mile greenway alignment.

Previous Investigations
A record search has been conducted at the South-Central Coastal Information Center and a pedestrian survey was completed on September 30, 2024. No precontact archaeological resources have been previously identified within the project site and the survey was negative for the presence of indications of indigenous archaeological resources. The SLF search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) returned positive. The cultural resources report is still in progress.

Request for Information
The NAHC has identified you as someone who may have information concerning cultural resources of tribal concern which may be present in the project site. If you have any knowledge of such resources within the project site, and are willing to share their nature and location, please let me know so I can include them in the cultural report. All information provided regarding specific sites or Native American cultural resources will remain confidential. My contact information is provided below.

Thank you much for your time and attention,
Roberto Mora, RPA
Archaeologist
Pronouns: he/him/his
D 916.732.3328 | M 916.330.0624
[email protected]
Ascent
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
O 916.444.7301
Note: My email address has changed, please
update your address book.

Appendix D
Geotechnical Report

Prepared for:

Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
617 West 7th Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017

FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

POMONA, CALIFORNIA
Prepared by:
3530 Hyland Ave, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Project Number: SC1303
9 May 2025 (Revised 12 June 2025)
SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 6/12/2025

FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

POMONA, CALIFORNIA
Prepared by:

Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
3530 Hyland Avenue, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
This report was prepared under the
supervision and direction of the undersigned
9 May 2025 (Revised 12 June 2025)
Santiago Caballero, Ph.D., P.E.(CA)
Project Geotechnical Engineer
Jerko Kocijan, Ph.D., P.E. (CA) G.E. (CA)
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL i 6/12/2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Project Description ...................................................................................... 1

1.2 Scope of Services......................................................................................... 2

1.3 Relevant Codes and Standards .................................................................... 2

1.4 Organization of the Report .......................................................................... 3

1.5 Previous Explorations and Available Information ...................................... 3

2. GEOTECHNICAL FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY
TESTING PROGRAM......................................................................................... 5

2.1 Site Visit / Reconnaissance and Pre-Exploration Planning......................... 5

2.2 Subsurface Explorations.............................................................................. 6

2.2.1 Phase I – Soil Borings Near SR-71 Undercrossing......................... 8

2.2.2 Phase II – Hand Auger Test Pits..................................................... 9

2.2.3 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Program................................... 10

2.2.4 Analytical Testing of Soil Cuttings............................................... 10

3. SITE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 11

3.1 Regional Geologic Conditions................................................................... 11

3.2 Site Conditions .......................................................................................... 11

3.3 Subsurface Conditions............................................................................... 12

3.4 Groundwater Conditions............................................................................ 13

3.5 Existing Adjacent Structures Near Proposed Bikeway Intersection ......... 13

4. GEOHAZARDS ................................................................................................. 14

4.1 Strong Ground Shaking and Design Ground Motions............................... 14

4.1.1 California Building Code (CBC) 2022 Response Spectrum......... 15

4.1.2 Caltrans Acceleration Response Spectrum (ARS)........................ 16

4.1.3 USACE Response Spectrum......................................................... 17

4.2 Liquefaction............................................................................................... 19

4.2.1 Lateral Spreading .......................................................................... 19

4.2.2 Seismic Dry Soil Settlement ......................................................... 19

4.2.3 Fault Surface Rupture ................................................................... 20

4.3 Geologic Hazards ...................................................................................... 20

4.3.1 Landslides and Slope Stability...................................................... 20

4.3.2 Expansive Soils............................................................................. 20

4.3.3 Flooding ........................................................................................ 20

4.3.4 Other Geologic Hazards................................................................ 21

5. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS........................ 22

5.1.1 Site Stripping and Demolition....................................................... 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL ii 6/12/2025

5.2 Excavation and Site Grading ..................................................................... 22

5.2.1 Subgrade Preparation .................................................................... 22

5.2.2 General Engineered Fill Placement............................................... 24

5.2.3 Structural Fill ................................................................................ 24

5.2.4 Compaction Between Proposed Walls and Adjacent
Structures...................................................................................... 25

5.3 Surface Drainage ....................................................................................... 25

5.4 Impact to Existing Adjacent Structures near Proposed Undercrossing..... 26

5.4.1 Evaluation of Existing Caltrans SR-71 Bridge Foundation .......... 26

5.4.2 Evaluation of Existing SJC Channel............................................. 27

5.5 Uplift of Proposed Undercrossing Slab..................................................... 27

5.6 Settlement .................................................................................................. 28

5.7 Modulus of Subgrade Reaction ................................................................. 28

5.8 Retaining Walls ......................................................................................... 28

5.8.1 Lateral Earth Pressures.................................................................. 28

5.8.2 Retaining Wall Backfill................................................................. 30

5.8.3 Sand-Slurry Backfill...................................................................... 30

5.8.4 Seismic Loads............................................................................... 30

5.9 Pavement Design Recommendations ........................................................ 31

5.10 Corrosivity of Onsite Soils........................................................................ 31

6. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................... 33

6.1 Groundwater During Excavation............................................................... 33

6.2 Construction Observation and Considerations.......................................... 33

6.3 Temporary Excavation Slopes................................................................... 33

7. LIMITATIONS................................................................................................... 34

8. REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 35 SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL iii 6/12/2025

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 – Summary of Geotechnical Explorations Near Proposed Intersection .............. 7 Table 2 – Summary of Test Pit Soils................................................................................ 9 Table 3 – Nearby Active Faults to SR-71 Undercrossing .............................................. 14 Table 4 – Design Ground Motion Parameters................................................................ 16 Table 5 – Caltrans ARS Online Design Response Spectra............................................. 17 Table 6 – OBE and MCE Ground Motions [USACE, 2024] ......................................... 18 Table 7 – Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaining Walls................................................... 29 Table 8 –Pavement Design Recommendations .............................................................. 31 Table 9 – Summary of Soil Corrosivity Laboratory Test Results.................................. 32

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 – Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 – Proposed Bikeway Undercrossing SR-71 Bridge
Figure 3A and 3B – As-built SR-71 Bridge Plans
Figure 4 – Boring Location Plan
Figure 5 – Regional Geology Map
Figure 6 –Seismic Hazard Zone Map

LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – 90% Concept Plans and Historical Information APPENDIX B – Geophysical Survey Report
APPENDIX C – Boring Logs
APPENDIX D – Hammer Efficiency Report
APPENDIX E – Analytical Soil Testing
APPENDIX F – Geotechnical Laboratory Results
APPENDIX G – ASCE 7 Hazard Report Output
APPENDIX H – Caltrans ARS Report Output
SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 1 6/12/2025

1. INTRODUCTION
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) is pleased to submit this geotechnical report to Alta Planning + Design Inc. (Alta) to support the design and construction of the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Project (Project) in Pomona, California (Site). The information provided in this report was in accordance with the Service Agreement dated 16 September 2022 signed between Geosyntec and Alta.

The Project consists of a paved bikeway alignment of approximately 3.4 miles, including a crossing under the State Route (SR) 71 at the San Jose Creek (SJC) Channel bridge (Bridge No. 53-2051, also referred to as SR-71 bridge in this report). This report includes geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the bikeway undercrossing of the SR-71 bridge between approximately proposed Sta. 90+90 to 96+00.

1.1 Project Description
Based on 90% design plans provided by Alta (Appendix A), we understand that the Project consists of a multi-use bikeway starting at the intersection of West Temple Ave and South Campus Dr. (approximately Sta. 10+00), running to the east and parallel to the SJC Channel (channel), on alternate sides of the channel, and ending near the intersection of Murchison Ave and the channel (Sta. 185+77.27). A site vicinity map is shown in Figure 1.

A proposed bikeway is anticipated to be constructed under the SR-71 at the San Jose Creek Channel bridge as part of the project, approximately between Sta. 90+90 to Sta. 96+00 on the proposed bikeway alignment. The undercrossing is located on the eastern side of the channel, between the channel wall and SR-71 bridge abutment No.2.

It is understood that the SR-71 bridge is under the jurisdiction of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and the SJC channel is under the jurisdiction of United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE). The proposed undercrossing of SR-71 bridge is shown in Figure 2. Extracts from the as-built plans for the SR-71 bridge, dated October 1972, are shown in Figure 3A and 3B. Based on as-built information, an older non-operating bridge is also present under the SR-71 bridge, with its abutment serving as part of the SJC channel wall, as shown in the photo insert in Figure 2. Based on 90% design plans for the undercrossing, the bottom of the proposed concrete slab will vary in elevation approximately between EL.+768 and EL.+773 ft. Elevations provided in the 90% plans and this report are based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) unless otherwise noted. The existing ground will need to be excavated up to approximately 6 to 10 feet at the lowest point between the proposed bikeway and the bridge (approximately Sta. 94+00) to provide the trail with a minimum of 10 feet of clearance below the bridge.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 2 6/12/2025 This project will also include new paved roads constructed near the existing ground level, integrated into the bikeway system, as well as several landscaped areas.

1.2 Scope of Services
The geotechnical field exploration program and recommendations documented in this Geotechnical Report were performed to support the proposed design and construction of the San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway alignment and the undercrossing of the SR-71 bridge. The objectives of this study were to develop an understanding of the site subsurface conditions (i.e., soil and groundwater conditions) along the proposed alignment, develop relevant geotechnical design parameters, and provide geotechnical recommendations and construction considerations. Geosyntec performed the following tasks as part of this scope:
• Review of available information near the proposed undercrossing along with the proposed alignment;
• Geotechnical subsurface explorations, in-situ testing, and sampling; • Geotechnical and analytical laboratory testing;
• Geotechnical evaluations and calculations;
• Development of geotechnical recommendations; and
• Preparation of this Report.

1.3 Relevant Codes and Standards
This report was prepared in general accordance with the following codes, standards, and manuals:
• 2025 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Seismic Design Criteria Version 2.1 (SDC V2.1) – ARS Online V4.0
• 2023 County of Los Angeles Building Code (Title 26);
• 2022 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2 (CBC, 2022); • 2016 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE 7-16); • 2022 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Geotechnical Manual; • 2015 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Memo to Designers (MTDs); and
• 2024 United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE), Earthquake Analysis, Evaluation, and Design for Civil Works Projects.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 3 6/12/2025

1.4 Organization of the Report
The body of this Report is divided into six sections, which contain the following:
• Section 1 – Introduction: provides a description of the Project, scope of work, project team, and summary of previous geotechnical investigations and available information;
• Section 2 – Geologic, Tectonic, and Seismic Setting: describes the regional and local geologic conditions;
• Section 3 – Geotechnical Field Investigations and Laboratory Testing Program: describes the current field investigation and laboratory testing program performed in support of the Project;
• Section 4 – Site Conditions: describes our understanding of the subsurface conditions based on the interpretation of the available data; • Section 5 – Seismic-Geologic Hazards: describes seismic and geologic hazards present at the site; and
• Section 6 – Geotechnical Recommendations: presents the results of geotechnical evaluations and provides relevant geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed bikeway undercrossing between proposed Sta. 90+90 to Sta. 96+00 and pavement recommendations for the proposed bikeway alignment.

1.5 Previous Explorations and Available Information
Geosyntec reviewed the available geotechnical information along the proposed bikeway alignment. As-built plans of the existing SR-71 bridge and the SJC Channel were provided by Alta as part of our document review. No additional geotechnical information was identified or provided for the remainder of the bikeway alignment. The reviewed documents are listed below:
• As-built plans for the SR-71 bridge dated October 1972, available as part of the Caltrans archive. The plans indicated that the bridge is supported on shallow footings embedded approximately at elevation EL.+767.0 ft based on the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD29), approximately EL.+769.14 ft NAVD88. Footings are designed with an allowable footing pressure of 2.0 tons per square feet (tsf) (4.0 kips per square foot, ksf), as indicated in Figure 3B. Furthermore, per the Caltrans SR-71 Freeway Conversion Project and fact sheet EA 21061 (PM 0.5/1.8) & 21062 (PM1.8/R4.7), we understand that Caltrans is planning to widen SR-71 to add one mixed flow lane and one High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction. The widening SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 4 6/12/2025 project is planned to occur in two phases, for which Phase 1 will include design and construction near the proposed bikeway intersection. The fact sheet states that Phase 1 construction will start between 2021 and 2024. For reference, the SR-71 bridge as-built, widening plans at the proposed crossing and the fact sheet of widening projects are included in Appendix A.
• Review of historical boring logs performed as part of the SR-71 bridge design performed at the intersection with the SJC Channel. The boring location plan and associated borings are included in As-built plans dated 6 January 1969. A total of four explorations were performed for the design during the design phase of the bridge at this location (i.e., B-1 through B-4). Groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 46 feet (approximately elevation EL.+723 feet) during the explorations in 1966. No reference datum was identified from these records.

For reference, the boring location plan and associated boring logs at this location are included in Appendix A.
• Review of historical boring logs performed approximately 400 feet east of the proposed project, on the Ridgeway St and SR-71 intersection. Two recent explorations were performed (i.e., A-20-001 and A-20-002) to a depth of approximately 100 feet below ground surface (bgs). No groundwater was encountered during this field exploration. For reference, the boring location plan and associated boring logs at this location are included in Appendix A.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 5 6/12/2025

2. GEOTECHNICAL FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY

TESTING PROGRAM
The geotechnical field exploration program and laboratory testing were performed to gather data regarding the subsurface conditions along the alignment and the proposed bikeway undercrossing with SR-71. The following subcontractors were retained in the execution of the field exploration program and laboratory testing:
• Utility Clearance Survey – Subsurface Surveys & Associates, California; • Hollow-stem Auger Drilling – BC2 Environmental, California; • Hand-Auger Test Pits – Veteran Drilling, California;
• Geotechnical Laboratory Testing – AP Engineering and Testing, Inc., California; • Soil Cuttings Analytical Testing – Eurofins Environment Testing Southwest, California; and
• Soil Cuttings Disposal – American Integrated Services, Inc., California.

Elements of the field exploration and laboratory testing are described in the following sections of this report.

2.1 Site Visit / Reconnaissance and Pre-Exploration Planning Geosyntec planned the field investigation in two phases. Phase I included the drilling of soil borings near the proposed bikeway undercrossing with SR-71. Phase II included the excavation of hand-auger test pits along the bikeway alignment. Prior to planning each phase of the field investigation, Geosyntec reviewed available relevant information for the Site, including regional and Site geology, historical Site use, and other available subsurface information from previous geotechnical studies (Caltrans, 1969; Caltrans, 2021 for the bikeway undercrossing with SR-71). Geosyntec field personnel also performed a site reconnaissance to visually assess the Site conditions, access, and mark the field exploration locations for utility clearance and accessibility.

For phase I, Geosyntec notified Underground Services Alert (USA-DigAlert) a minimum of 48 hours prior to drilling (DigAlert Ticket Nos. A241310064-00A and B241310045- 00B) to identify the presence of any subsurface utilities at the proposed exploration locations. Geosyntec also obtained exploration permits to advance the borings from the County of Los Angeles, Public Health department, required under the Drinking Water Program (Permit No. SR0369497).

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 6 6/12/2025 Geosyntec also prepared a Health and Safety Task Hazard Analysis (THA) for both Phases I and II of the field investigation that included a description of the proposed field operations outlining the appropriate procedures to safely implement the scope of work performed in the field.

2.2 Subsurface Explorations
Geosyntec conducted geotechnical subsurface explorations, in-situ testing, and a sampling program, as summarized in Table 1. This table also includes a list of historical geotechnical explorations near the proposed bikeway undercrossing at SR-71. No additional historical explorations were identified along the remainder of the proposed bikeway alignment. Figures 4A through 4E illustrate the locations of both the recent and historical explorations along the alignment, including those near the proposed bridge undercrossing. Due to access restrictions within Caltrans and the USACE jurisdictional areas, Geosyntec performed our subsurface investigation (i.e., soil borings) approximately 250 to 350 feet from the proposed intersection.

As part of Phase I of the field investigation and prior to advancement of the drilled exploratory borings of the current exploration, and in addition to notifying DigAlert service as described above, each boring location was surveyed using the following geophysical instruments for utility conflict. A geophysical report provided by the subcontractor and associated field notes are included in Appendix B. • Electromagnetic (EM) Instruments: Fischer TW-6 M-Scope; • Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR): Sensors and Software Noggin; • Line Locators: Metrotech 9800 series and a Ridgid SR-60; and • Magnetics: Schonstedt GA-52.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 7 6/12/2025 Table 1 – Summary of Geotechnical Explorations Near Proposed Intersection Exploration
Type and
ID
Approximate
Surface
Elevation
(feet)1
Drilled
Depth
(feet)
Approximate
Latitude
(deg)2
Approximate
Longitude
(deg)2
Drilling
Date
Groundwater
(feet bgs)3
Current Exploration (Geosyntec, 2024)
B-1 768 51.5 34.063986 -117.797060 5/16/2024 N.E.

B-2 775 51.5 34.064692 -117.794730 5/15/2024 N.E.

P-1 701 3 34.050928 -117.815681 12/5/2024 N.E.

P-2 706 3 34.052928 -117.814308 12/5/2024 N.E.

P-3 710 3 34.054967 -117.815681 12/13/2024 N.E.

P-4 710 3 34.056464 -117.810681 12/13/2024 N.E.

P-5 719 3 34.058336 -117.808753 12/13/2024 N.E.

P-6 725 3 34.059261 -117.806194 12/13/2024 N.E.

P-7 729 3 34.060092 -117.803444 12/13/2024 N.E.

P-8 737 3 34.061539 -117.80105 12/13/2024 N.E.

P-9 770 3 34.064147 -117.796728 12/5/2024 N.E.

P-10 778 3 34.065472 -117.79325 12/5/2024 N.E.

P-11 783 3 34.065931 -117.790564 12/5/2024 N.E.

P-12 795 3 34.066369 -117.787919 12/5/2024 N.E.

P-13 792 3 34.067208 -117.785083 12/5/2024 N.E.

P-14 804 3 34.067853 -117.782128 12/4/2024 N.E.

P-15 817 3 34.068344 -117.779564 12/4/2024 N.E.

P-16 826 3 34.068475 -117.776919 12/4/2024 N.E.

P-17 834 3 34.069436 -117.773153 12/4/2024 N.E.

P-18 853 3 34.070531 -117.769031 12/5/2024 N.E.

P-19 745 3 34.062589 -117.799506 12/13/2024 N.E.

Historical Explorations (Near the proposed bikeway undercrossing with SR-71) A-20-01 7914 100 - - 01/23/2020 N.E.

A-20-02 7984 97 - - 01/30/2020 N.E.

B-1 7695 60 - - 9/16/1966 46
B-2 7755 55 - - 9/14/1966 N.M.

B-3 770555 - - 9/14/1966 N.M.

B-4 776540 - - 9/15/1966 N.M.

Notes:
1 Surface elevation estimated based on Google Earth, or as listed on State of California Department of Public Works, Division of Highways records.
2 Coordinate system refers to WGS84.
3 N.E.- Not Encountered; N.M. – Not Measured.
4 Elevation noted based on NAVD88 per records.
5 Datum Not Available on As-Built Records.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 8 6/12/2025

2.2.1 Phase I – Soil Borings Near SR-71 Undercrossing
Phase I of the field investigation was conducted between 15 and 16 May 2024. Phase I consisted of drilling two hollow-stem auger (HSA) borings to 50 feet bgs near the north and south side of SR-71 bridge Abutment No.2. Due to accessibility factorsto the location of the proposed crossing, the closest location at which Geosyntec was able to conduct the field explorations was approximately 200 feet west of Abutment No.2 (Boring B-1) and approximately 350 feet east of Abutment No. 2 (Boring B-2), as shown in Figure 4C.

The HSA borings were drilled with an 8-inch diameter auger, using a truck-mounted CME 95 drill rig. Prior to advancing the HSA borings, the uppermost 5 feet were hand augered. Cuttings from each location were collected as bulk samples in the upper 2.5 feet, and soil samples were then collected at 2.5-foot intervals to 12.5 feet bgs and in 5-foot intervals thereafter to the total depth of exploration. Representative soil samples were obtained using a 2-inch outside diameter split-barrel spoon sampler in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D1586, Standard Penetration Test (SPT) or a 3-inch outside diameter Modified California (ModCal) sampler. SPTs were performed by driving the split-spoon sampler into the soil 18 inches over three sixinch intervals by means of an automatic 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of hammer blows required to drive the sampler through the second and third 6- inch intervals (i.e., the N values) for each sample are indicated on the soil test boring logs included in Appendix C. The N values provide an indication of the in-place consistency and density of the soils. Soil borings were backfilled with a cement bentonite grout after completion of drilling.

Excess soil cuttings were stored in drums for analytical testing and further disposal. The hammer efficiency test report provided by the drilling subcontractor is included in Appendix D. The exploration program was performed under the supervision of a California Licensed Professional Engineer (PE). The subsurface descriptions (visualmanual procedures) were developed in general accordance with ASTM Test Standard D2488 (ASTM, 2020). Visual Soil Classification and laboratory test results were performed in general accordance with ASTM D2487-17 (Unified Soil Classification System, 2017). A key to the logs, along with the individual boring logs, is included with the boring logs. Sampling information and other pertinent field data and observations are included in the boring logs.

Once the augers were removed, both borings were tremie backfilled with cementbentonite grout. In general accordance with County of Los Angeles drilling permit requirements, the concrete driveway at the B-1 boring location was restored using quickset concrete patch, and the pavement at the B-2 boring location was restored with a cold asphalt patch.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 9 6/12/2025

2.2.2 Phase II – Hand Auger Test Pits
Phase II of the field investigation was conducted along the proposed bikeway alignment between 4 and 13 December 2024. Phase II consisted of excavating 19 hand auger test pits to a depth of 3 feet bgs. The test pits were spaced approximately 1,000 feet apart along the entire alignment, as shown in Figure 4A to 4E. The hand-auger test pits were excavated with a 3-inch diameter hand auger. Cuttings were visually classified, and bulk samples were collected at each location for laboratory testing. Hand-auger test pits were backfilled with cuttings. The exploration program was performed under the supervision of a California Licensed PE. The subsurface descriptions (visual-manual procedures) were developed in general accordance with ASTM Test Standard D2488 (ASTM, 2020).

Visual Soil Classification and laboratory test results were performed in general accordance with ASTM D2487-17 (Unified Soil Classification System, 2017). A summary of the hand auger test pits and the visual classification of collected samples is tabulated in Table 2.

Table 2 – Summary of Test Pit Soils
Test Pit ID Soil Descriptiona
P1 Light yellowish brown Clayey Sand (SC) [5,80,15]
P2 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) [5,75,20]
P3 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) [5,75,20]
P4 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) [5,65,30]
P5 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) [5,75,20]
P6 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) [0,70,30]
P-7 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) [5,75,20]
P8 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) [15,60,25] P9 Yellowish brown Sandy Silt with Gravel (ML) [15,30,55] P10 Yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) [10,75,15]
P11 Reddish brown Silty Sand (SM) [0,85,15]
P12b Dark reddish brown Sandy Silt with Gravel (ML) [15,30,55] P13 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) [10,75,15]
P14 Yellowish brown Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) [15,70,15] P15 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) [10,75,15]
P16 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand with Gravel [15,70,15] P17 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand (SM) with Gravel [20,65,15] P18 Light yellowish brown Silty Sand with Gravel [15,70,15] P19 Light yellowish brown Clayey Sand (SC) [5,75,20]
Notes:
a. Percentages in brackets represent the percentage for gravel, sand and fines respectively, based on visual classification.
b. Asphalt core (3-inches)
SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 10 6/12/2025

2.2.3 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Program
Geosyntec retained the services of AP Engineering and Testing, Inc., of Pomona, California, for geotechnical laboratory testing. The laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM testing procedures or other generally accepted test methods.
• Particle-size distribution (finer than #200 sieve) using wash (ASTM D1140); • Moisture content and dry density (ASTM D2216 and D7263); • Direct Shear (ASTM D3080);
• Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318); and
• R-Values (ASTM D2844).

Results of the laboratory testing program are summarized in Appendix F. The results of the geotechnical laboratory testing program were used to corroborate field classifications and assist in selecting inputs for geotechnical evaluations. Additionally, one sample from the Phase I soil borings was collected for soil corrosivity testing, including minimum resistivity, sulfate content, chloride content, and pH (California Testing Method [CTM] 643, CTM 417, and CTM 422). The results of this testing are included in Appendix B-2.

Corrosion-related recommendations are presented in Section 5.8 of this report.

2.2.4 Analytical Testing of Soil Cuttings
Exploration-derived soil cuttings from Phase I soil borings were drummed in 50-gallon steel drums and stored off site at the City of Pomona Parks Maintenance Yard, pending analytical sampling and disposal. A total of seven drums were collected with soil cuttings for Phase I. Two composite samples were collected for analytical testing before disposal.

Based on the analytical test results, the soil cuttings were transported and disposed of as non-hazardous materials. Results of the analytical testing are included in Appendix E.

Analytical testing included the following:
• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA 8260B;
• Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) by EPA M8015B;
• Chlorinated Pesticides (OCP) by EPA 8081A; and
• Title 22 Metals and Mercury by EPA 6010B/7471A.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 11 6/12/2025

3. SITE CONDITIONS
The surface, subsurface, and geotechnical characterization of the Site is based on a review of topographic information provided by publicly available information from the California Geological Survey (CGS) and from the findings of our field explorations described in Section 2. The review of the site conditions includes a description of geologic and geotechnical conditions and an evaluation of both the current and historical groundwater elevations.

3.1 Regional Geologic Conditions
The project site is situated south of the San Jose Hills and north of the Puente Hills in the eastern portion of the Los Angeles Basin. The Los Angeles Basin is located at the northern extent of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province, which extends south into Baja California, Mexico. The Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province is characterized by a series of northwest trending mountains and valleys separated by associated faults that developed in response to oblique, right-lateral, strike-slip fault zones associated with the plate boundary interaction between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates. The site lies north of a mapped northwest trending splay of the Elsinore fault located at the eastern base of the Puente and Chino Hills. This splay of the Elsinore fault is a reverse right-lateral sense of movement with an estimated slip rate of 1.0 millimeters (mm) to

5.0 mm per year. The site is also south of the San Jose fault, which lies at the southeastern flank of the San Jose Hills. The San Jose fault is a northwest dipping, left-lateral reverse fault with a 0.2-mm to 1.0-mm per year slip rate. The closest Holocene-Active fault and potential seismic source to the Site is the Duarte fault, which is part of the Sierra Madre fault zone located 7.0 miles to the northwest. The Sierra Madre fault zone is a northdipping reverse fault zone located at the southern flank of the San Gabriel Mountains with an average slip rate of 1.0 mm to 5.0 mm per year.

The youngest deposits in the vicinity of the site are Holocene to late Pleistocene alluvium.

At depth, the alluvium is underlain by Cretaceous-age crystalline granitic bedrock, which is primarily Tonalite. A Regional Geology Map is illustrated in Figure 5.

3.2 Site Conditions
Based on 90% design plans provided by Alta, we understand that the bikeway alignment is generally planned near existing ground surface elevations starting between approximately Sta. 10+00 to 185+77.27. The elevations for the proposed alignment range between approximately EL. +703 ft NAVD88 near Sta. 10+00 to approximately EL. +857 ft NAVD88 near Sta. 185+77.27. The alignment runs along the SJC Channel, and it is anticipated that some of the near surface soils along the alignment consist of the backfill material previously placed and compacted behind the channel walls. The surface SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 12 6/12/2025 conditions along the proposed bikeway alignment consist of unpaved surface, gravel, or asphalt concrete paving at some locations.

Existing surface elevations near the proposed bikeway undercrossing with SR-71 between Sta. 90+90 to Sta. 96+00, range approximately between EL.+770 and +778 ft NAVD88. As noted earlier in this report, the proposed construction consists of excavating the ground surface under the SR-71 bridge to the proposed bottom of the concrete slab that will also vary in elevation between approximately EL.+768 and EL.+773.50 ft NAVD88 at the proposed undercrossing. From the as-built bridge plans shown in Figure 3A, we also understand that the bottom of the shallow footing on Abutment No.2 for the SR-71 bridge is approximately at EL.+767 ft NGVD29 (EL.+769.14 ft NAVD88 as shown in Figure 2).

3.3 Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface conditions near the proposed bikeway undercrossing were evaluated using data from historical exploratory borings, considering the likely construction sequence for the channel and SR-71 bridge based on as-built documentation, and findings from the current Phase I field investigation. For the purpose of the subsurface evaluation at this location, Geosyntec divided the subsurface into shallow materials (i.e., soils from the existing ground surface to the bottom of existing wall channel, average elevation El.+757 ft NAVD88) (See Profile and Typical Section at Proposed Crossing in Figure 2) and materials deeper below the bottom of channel bottom. From the bridge as-built plans (Figure 3A and 3B), it can be interpreted that the channel was constructed before the current SR-71 bridge, and therefore, it can be considered that, to allow long-term performance of the channel wall, soils behind the channel wall may consist of compacted fill material that is typically used as backfill behind walls. It is also interpreted that the bridge foundation may have been supported on competent native material below EL.+769.14 ft NAVD88 and backfilled with structural backfill to the existing ground surface as part of the construction of the bridge foundations.

By considering the above sequence of construction and interpretation, soils underneath the proposed bikeway undercrossing, from the existing ground surface to an approximate average elevation of EL.+757 ft NAVD88, may consist of compacted fill soils and competent native soils as part of previous construction materials. Deeper materials below average elevation EL.+757 ft NAVD88 were assessed based on historical boring logs performed for the SR-71 bridge design (i.e., B-1 to B-4, Caltrans 1966), more recent historical boring logs near the intersection (i.e., A-20-001 and A-20-002, Caltrans 2020) and current explorations (i.e., B-1 and B-2, Geosyntec 2024). Deeper materials below average EL.+757 ft NAVD88, may include medium dense to dense Silty Sands (SM), Clayey Sands (SC) and firm to very stiff Sandy Lean Clays, Lean Clays, and Lean Clays SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 13 6/12/2025 with Sand (CL) and Silt with Sand (ML). Some interbedded gravel was also encountered in a few layers at depths below EL.+757 ft NAVD88.

Near-ground surface soils (i.e., up to 3 feet bgs) located along the proposed bikeway alignment were evaluated based on the current Phase II field investigation. The encountered near-ground surface soils consist of previously compacted materials as part of the channel walls, as described in SJC channel as-built information. Based on our review of the SJC channel as-built information, it is unknown how backfill materials were placed and compacted. Based on our Phase II field investigation, the near-ground surface soils along the alignment generally consist of Clayey Sands (SC), Silty Sands (SC) and Poorly graded Sands (SP).

3.4 Groundwater Conditions
No groundwater was encountered during the current investigation. Groundwater information from explorations near the proposed undercrossing, dated 1966 and 1972, indicated an approximate groundwater level about 46 feet bgs, approximate elevation EL+726 feet. No reference datum was identified in those records. Groundwater is not expected to affect the design and construction of the proposed bikeway alignment, including the bikeway undercrossing. However, it should be noted that fluctuations in groundwater levels and presence of perched water may occur as a result of seasonal variations in rainfall, evaporation, construction activity, surface runoff, and other sitespecific factors.

3.5 Existing Adjacent Structures Near Proposed Bikeway Intersection As described earlier in this report, the SR-71 bridge crosses obliquely over the proposed bikeway undercrossing, approximately between station Sta. 92+00 to Sta. 94+00. Based on the 90% design plans, we understand that shallow foundation of the SR-71 bridge are approximately at elevation EL.+769.14 ft NAVD88 and will have an approximate 3-foot clearance from the outer edge of the existing foundation to the proposed retaining wall of the bikeway undercrossing. For reference, a typical cross section is included in Appendix A.

The SJC channel will also run parallel to the proposed bikeway alignment and crossing, which consist of a reinforced concrete U-shape channel. We understand that the clearance between the existing retaining wall of the SJC channel structure and the planned retaining wall of the bikeway undercrossing will be approximately 9 inches.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 14 6/12/2025

4. GEOHAZARDS
This section contains a description and evaluation of potential geohazards such as fault rupture, ground shaking, liquefaction, and lateral spreading, based the understanding of site conditions described in Section 3 and a review of relevant publicly available information.

4.1 Strong Ground Shaking and Design Ground Motions
The Site is situated within a seismically active Southern California region and will likely experience moderate to severe ground shaking in response to a large magnitude earthquake occurring on a local or more distant active fault during the lifespan of the proposed facility. As a result, seismically induced ground shaking in response to an earthquake occurring on a nearby active fault, such as the San Jose Fault located to the northwest or the Indian Hill Fault, located to the northwest, is considered to be the major geologic hazard affecting the Project. Other active faults in the vicinity include the Sierra Madre Fault zone to the north, the Elsinore Fault Zone (Chino Section) Fault to the southeast, the San Antonia Fault to the northeast, the Elsinore Fault Zone (Whittier Section) to the southwest, the Yorba Linda Fault to the southeast, and the Red HillEtiwanda Avenue fault to the northeast. These fault zones and their respective distances from the Site and the representative maximum Moment Magnitudes, as obtained from the 2013 Caltrans Fault database, are summarized in Table 3 below.

Table 3 – Nearby Active Faults to SR-71 Undercrossing
Fault Name Distance and Direction
from the Site
Maximum Moment
Magnitude
San Jose Fault About 0.37 miles to the
northwest 6.6
Indian Hill Fault About 2.97 miles to the
northwest 6.4
Sierra Madre Fault Zone About 4.5 miles north 7.2
Elsinore Fault Zone
(Chino Section) About 8 miles southeast 6.6
San Antonio Fault About 8.25 miles northeast 6.5
Elsinore Fault Zone
(Whittier Section) About 9.5 miles southwest 6.9
Yorba Linda Fault About 10 miles southeast 6.4
Red Hill-Etiwanda Avenue Fault About 10 miles northeast 6.2 SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 15 6/12/2025

4.1.1 California Building Code (CBC) 2022 Response Spectrum The seismic design parameters for the project were established in accordance with California Building Code 2022 [CBC, 2022], Chapter 26, Section 1613 for Site Class D, which follows ASCE 7-16 Chapter 20. The average SPT blow counts obtained during the Phase I soil exploration ranged from 15 to 50 blows per foot within the upper 51.5 feet of soil. Based on these field N-values and in accordance with ASCE 7-16 criteria, the site is classified as Site Class D, indicative of "stiff soil" conditions. We assumed that the soil below the boring termination depth of 51.5 feet to 100 feet bgs to be similar for the purpose of estimating Site Class. Mapped ground motion parameters SS and S1 were obtained using the ASCE 7 Hazard Tool (https://asce7hazardtool.online/). The output from the web tool is included in Appendix G. The seismic design parameters are summarized in Table 4.

Note that ASCE 7-16, Section 11.4.8, requires that sites classified as Site Class D with an S1 greater than or equal to 0.2 perform a site-specific ground motion hazard analysis.

Although the Site meets the criteria for this requirement, a site-specific ground motion hazard analysis was not performed, which is permitted per Exception #2 in ASCE 7-16 Section 11.4.8. This exception states that a ground motion hazard analysis is not required provided that the value of the seismic response coefficient Cs is determined by Eq. (12.8-2) for values of T ≤ 1.5Ts and taken as equal to 1.5 times the value computed in accordance with either Eq. (12.8-3) for TL ≥ T > 1.5Ts or Eq. (12.8-4) for T > TL. This approach to computation of the seismic response coefficient Cs, should be implemented by the structural engineer.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 16 6/12/2025 Table 4 – Design Ground Motion Parameters
Parameter Value
Approximate Site Latitude (degrees) 34.064372
Approximate Site Longitude (degrees) -117.796128
Site Class D
Mapped Short Period Spectral Response Acceleration, Ss 1.73 g Mapped 1-second Spectral Response Acceleration, S1 0.628 g (a)
Short Period Site coefficient (at 0.2-s period), Fa 1.0 Long Period Site coefficient (at 1.0-s period), Fv 1.7 (a) Site-modified Short Period Spectral Response Acceleration, SMS 1.73 g Site-modified 1-second Spectral Response Acceleration, SM1 1.068 g Design Short Period Spectral Response Acceleration, SDS 1.153 g Design 1-second Spectral Response Acceleration, SD1 0.712 g Long Period Transition 8 s
Mapped MCEG Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA 0.738 g
Site Coefficient, FPGA 1.1
Site Class Adjusted MCEG Peak Ground Acceleration, PGAM 0.812 g Design Moment Magnitude 6.84 (b)
Notes:
a. See the commentary in ASCE/SEI 7-16, Section 11.4.8 “Exception note” 2. b. Design moment magnitude selected using a deaggregation data from the USGS hazard Tool USGS Hazard Tool, Dynamic Conterminous U.S. 2014 (update).

4.1.2 Caltrans Acceleration Response Spectrum (ARS) Online V4.0 The Caltrans Acceleration Response Spectrum (ARS) curves were developed following guidelines in Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC V2.1, 2025) and Caltrans ARS Online V4.0 applying near-fault adjustment factors as required by SDC V2.1 and the USGS uniform hazard spectrum for 975-year return period event. Site subsurface conditions were incorporated into the ARS development by using the site-specific assessment of the static (small-strain) Vs30, the time-average shear wave velocity in the top 100 feet (30 meters). Shear wave velocities were not measured during the current investigation and were estimated based on nearby records obtained from the Shear-wave velocity profile database, VSPDB (Accessed June 2024). Shear wave velocities between 250 to 310 m/s (approximately 800 to 1,000 ft/s) were obtained for the proposed crossing and used as upper and lower values for estimation for the response spectrum. Table 5 presents design ARS data based on an envelope of the upper and lower bound of shear SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 17 6/12/2025 wave velocities collected. probabilistic event The results of the deaggregation at PGA level for the 975-return period indicates a controlling moment magnitude of about 7.25 and mean site-source distance for spectral acceleration at a 1-second period of 16.52 kilometers. The output from the web tool for the upper and lower value of shear wave velocities is included in Appendix H.

Table 5 – Caltrans ARS Online Design Response Spectra
T (s)
Design Sa (g)
975 years (5% in 50 Years)
0 0.69

0.05 0.82

0.1 1.21

0.15 1.47

0.2 1.6

0.25 1.68

0.3 1.71

0.4 1.66

0.5 1.58

0.75 1.37
1 1.21

1.5 0.86
2 0.65
3 0.42
4 0.29
5 0.22

7.5 0.12
10 0.08

4.1.3 USACE Response Spectrum
The ER 1110-2-1806 USACE [USACE 2024] publication dated 29 May 2024 provides general provisions to provide earthquake ground motions and associated performance requirements for analysis, evaluation, and design of civil works project features. The provisions indicate that ground motions should be provided for the following performance criteria and by categorizing the project features as non-critical or critical features. Following “Table 1 – Consequence-based project feature classification” of the ER 1110-2-1806 USACE provisions, the SJC channel may be classified as a non-critical feature.
a. Operating basis earthquake ground motion (OBE-GM), which uses a hazard spectrum for 975-year return period event (i.e., 5% in 50 years); and SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 18 6/12/2025 b. The maximum credible earthquake ground motion (MCE-GM), which uses a hazard spectrum for 145-year return period event (i.e., 1% in 1 years).

Corresponding ground motions were estimated from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) website developed as part of the National Seismic Hazard Mapping (NSHM) project. The NSHM 2018 ground motions model is adopted in ASCE/SEI 7-22. The NSHM 2023 ground motion model is an updated model to the NSHM 2018 model, with a significant impact on the location-level hazard results at long return periods. However, we understand that based on the structure type, evaluation at long periods will not control.

The ground motions developed as part of the NSHM 2018 (ASCE/SEI 7-22) and NSHM 2023 are provided in Table 6.

Table 6 – OBE and MCE Ground Motions [USACE, 2024]
T (s)
Sa (g)
975 years (5% in 50 Years)
Sa (g)
145 years (1% in 1 Year)
ASCE/SEI 2022
(NSHM, 2018) NSHM (2023) ASCE/SEI 2022 (NSHM, 2018) NSHM (2023) PGA 0.61 0.67 0.29 0.34

0.01 0.61 0.68 0.29 0.35

0.02 0.61 0.68 0.30 0.35

0.03 0.62 0.69 0.30 0.36

0.05 0.70 0.78 0.35 0.40

0.075 0.87 0.97 0.43 0.51

0.1 1.03 1.16 0.52 0.60

0.15 1.26 1.38 0.64 0.75

0.2 1.39 1.54 0.71 0.83

0.25 1.48 1.64 0.74 0.86

0.3 1.54 1.71 0.75 0.87

0.4 1.51 1.69 0.70 0.82

0.5 1.43 1.60 0.64 0.75

0.75 1.14 1.28 0.48 0.57
1 0.94 1.04 0.38 0.44

1.5 0.66 0.73 0.25 0.30
2 0.49 0.55 0.18 0.21
3 0.32 0.35 0.11 0.13
4 0.23 0.25 0.08 0.09
5 0.17 0.18 0.05 0.07

7.5 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.04
10 0.06 0.07 0.02 0.02
SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 19 6/12/2025

4.2 Liquefaction
Seismically induced soil liquefaction can be described as a significant loss of strength and stiffness due to the generation of cyclic pore water pressure from seismic shaking or other large cyclic loading. The material types considered most susceptible to liquefaction are saturated, loose- to medium-dense granular soils and low-plasticity, fine-grained soils.

Manifestations of soil liquefaction can include the loss of bearing capacity below foundations, surface settlements and tilting in level ground, and instabilities in areas of sloping ground. Soil liquefaction can also result in increased lateral and uplift pressures on buried structures. Lightweight or unrestrained buried structures may float upward to the ground surface during a liquefaction event. The Seismic Hazard Zone Map for the project area shown in Figure 6 indicates that the Site may be underlain by soils that are potentially susceptible to liquefaction.

As noted earlier in this report, the groundwater level was encountered at approximately 46 feet bgs in 1966 during the initial explorations performed for the SR-71 bridge. More recent boring log information near the bridge [Caltrans 2020], explorations A-20-001 and A-20-002, did not encounter groundwater and were advanced to approximately 100 feet bgs. Furthermore, groundwater was not encountered during our current Phase I explorations, which advanced to approximately 50 feet bgs. Considering the depth of groundwater and the presence of predominantly stiff fine-grained cohesive soils underlain by dense coarse-grained soils below 50 feet, the probability of soil liquefaction and liquefaction-induced settlement at the site is low.

4.2.1 Lateral Spreading
Seismically induced lateral spreading is a potential hazard characterized by lateral movement of liquefied saturated soils in gently sloping ground with free face (stream banks, and shorelines), when liquefiable soil layers are continuous over large lateral areas.

Given the absence of shallow groundwater and negligible liquefaction triggering potential, the potential for lateral spreading is also considered negligible.

4.2.2 Seismic Dry Soil Settlement
Unsaturated cohesionless soils above the groundwater table may be subject to seismically induced settlement during strong ground shaking. An assessment of seismically induced dry sand settlements of unsaturated soils at the proposed crossing was performed.

Approximately 1 to 2 inches of total seismically induced settlement of unsaturated sands above the groundwater level were estimated. Differential settlements were estimated to be about one-half of the total settlements over a distance of about 30 feet. Dry sand settlement estimation was estimated using two-thirds of the PGAM by following the procedures provided in the methodology developed by Pradel [Pradel, 1998].

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 20 6/12/2025

4.2.3 Fault Surface Rupture
Fault surface rupture refers to the offset that occurs in the ground during an earthquake as a result of the relative movement of the ground on both sides of a fault. When that offset reaches the ground surface, either because the fault extends to the surface or because the offset propagates from the fault at depth through overlying soil to the surface, it is referred to as surface-fault rupture. Based on the review of online maps provided as part of the CGS Seismic Hazards Program: Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zones, the project site is not within a State of California Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone. As discussed earlier, the closest fault (San Jose fault) is located approximately 2,000 feet northwest of the project site. There are no known active or potentially active faults transecting the site.

Therefore, we anticipate the potential for surface fault rupture to be low for the project site.

4.3 Geologic Hazards

4.3.1 Landslides and Slope Stability
Considering the lack of steep slopes adjacent to the Site, landslides and slope stability are not considered a significant developmental hazard for the proposed facilities.

Furthermore, the CGS (2024) website for Earthquake Zone of Required Investigation (Figure 6) indicates that the Site is not located within an earthquake-induced landslide zone.

4.3.2 Expansive Soils
The term “expansive soils” refer to soils that exhibit significant volumetric expansion when water content is increased and volumetric contraction when water content is decreased. Expansive soils typically contain a relatively high percentage of clayey material, and their expansion potential is generally related to the type of clay mineral (e.g., montmorillonite). Based on the interpretation of construction and evaluation of subsurface conditions described in Section 3.3, soils underneath the proposed undercrossing are considered to have a low potential for expansion.

4.3.3 Flooding
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) presents the flood hazard potential in the vicinity of the site as part of their National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) for Geographic Information Systems (GIS). NFHL, accessed in 2024, indicates the proposed undercrossing is located in Zone X, which is defined as an “area of 0.2% annual chance of flood” [FEMA, 2024]. Based on our review of the FEMA mapping, the geologic and physiographic setting, the distance to the ocean and other large water bodies, and the project elevations, the potential for flooding or inundation at the proposed SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 21 6/12/2025 bikeway undercrossing site and along the alignment is considered low. However, it should be noted that due to the grading of the undercrossing, localized flooding or water ponding can occur and therefore an adequate drainage system should be considered as part of its design.

4.3.4 Other Geologic Hazards
Other potential geologic hazards evaluated that could possibly affect the Project include tsunamis and seiches. Tsunamis are seismically induced waves generated by sudden movements of the ocean bottom during submarine earthquakes, landslides, or volcanic activity. Seiches are similarly generated, but are oscillating waves within bodies of water such as reservoirs, lakes, or bays resulting in overtopping. The proposed project is not located within a mapped tsunami inundation area and no enclosed water bodies are located adjacent to or upgradient of the immediate project area. Based on the physiographic setting of the project, the distance to the ocean or other large water bodies, and the elevation of the project site, it is our opinion that the potential for flooding from seismically induced tsunamis and seiches is not considered a potential hazard.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 22 6/12/2025

5. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our understanding of site conditions, it is our opinion that the proposed bikeway alignment, including the proposed undercrossing with SR-71 bridge, are feasible from a geotechnical perspective, provided that the recommendations outlined in this report are implemented in the design and construction.

5.1.1 Site Stripping and Demolition
Geosyntec understands that some stripping of vegetation and removal of debris and asphalt at some locations may be necessary prior to excavation and site grading.

Furthermore, near the SR-71 bridge, based on the discretion of the project designer and the structural engineer, a demolition of the existing non-operating bridge slab may be also necessary (photo shown in Figure 2). Debris resultant from demolition should be disposed of off-site.

5.2 Excavation and Site Grading

5.2.1 Subgrade Preparation

5.2.1.1 General Bikeway Alignment
We understand that the finished grade of alignment will consist of flexible pavement.

Based on the 90% design plans provided by Alta, the pavement finished grade is proposed near the existing ground surface, and therefore, minimum cut and fill earthwork is anticipated to achieve the finished grades. Some areas will require new compacted fill to meet final grades. The pavement section for the bikeway alignment may be placed on existing near-ground surface soils provided that the subgrade is prepared as described in this section.

The subgrade below the pavement section should be scarified to a depth of approximately 8 inches, moisture conditioned to 0 and 3 percent above optimum moisture content, and compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D 1557.

If the subgrade soil of these areas is soft or disturbed, it should be excavated to expose firm soil, with the resulting subgrade scarified and conditioned as above, and the excavated material replaced with structural fill, as described in Section 5.2.3 below.

As discussed in earlier sections, Geosyntec does not anticipate encountering undocumented fill or unsuitable native soils such as expansive soils in the near-ground surface soils of the proposed alignment. Based on our evaluation of the near-ground surface soil conditions along the alignment, on-site soils can be considered suitable for general fill and structural backfill after observation and approval by the project geotechnical engineer. If on-site soils are not suitable for backfill, imported engineered SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 23 6/12/2025 fill may be necessary. After achieving target subgrade elevations and the subgrade is exposed, the geotechnical engineer should assess the subgrade area to identify any areas that may have unsuitable subgrade. The bottom of the excavations and subgrade exposed should be observed and approved by the project geotechnical engineer.

5.2.1.2 Bikeway Undercrossing
Based on 90% design plans provided by Alta, the proposed bikeway undercrossing will consist of a U-shape reinforced concrete structure. To achieve grading of the proposed undercrossing, we understand that soils in front of the SR-71 bridge Abutment No.2, approximately between Sta. 90+90 to Sta. 96+00, are planned to be excavated, as shown in Figure 2. As shown in the profile view of the undercrossing (Figure 2), the depth of excavation to the bottom of the proposed concrete slab is planned to range approximately between a minimum of 2.5 feet bgs at Sta. 90+90 to approximately a maximum 8 to 10 feet bgs at the lowest point of the undercrossing at approximately Sta. 94+00.

Geosyntec anticipates the following steps to achieve adequate excavation and grading for the undercrossing and should follow the recommendations provided by the Caltrans Construction Manual Section 4-1903B [Caltrans, 2019]:
• After achieving target excavation depths and the subgrade is exposed, the geotechnical engineer should assess the subgrade area to identify any areas that may have unsuitable subgrade. The bottom of the excavation should be observed and approved by the project geotechnical engineer.
• Geosyntec anticipates the subgrade to be compacted backfill used as part of the construction of the channel wall and/or competent soils at which the bridge foundations are supported.
• The bottom of excavations should be scarified to a depth of 8 inches, moistureconditioned between 0 and 3 percent above optimum moisture content, and compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D 1557.

As discussed in earlier sections, Geosyntec does not anticipate encountering undocumented fill or unsuitable native soils, such as expansive soils, at the bottom of the excavation. However, if these soils are locally identified or if the exposed subgrade soil is soft or disturbed, it should be overexcavated to expose firm soil following the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer on site, with the resulting subgrade scarified and conditioned as above, and the excavated material replaced with general engineered fill or structural fill and following the compaction requirements discussed in Section 5.2.3 or Section 5.2.4, respectively. Compaction requirements will follow the Caltrans Construction Manual [Caltrans, 2019]. The geotechnical engineer on site may SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 24 6/12/2025 recommend collecting localized shallow samples for testing against collapse and expansion.

5.2.2 General Engineered Fill Placement
Geosyntec does not anticipate significant fill to achieve grading along the alignment and near the undercrossing. However, some fill may be necessary at some locations and also if localized unsuitable soils are identified and overexcavation is performed near the undercrossing. On-site soils and imported engineered fill soils should be free of perishable, organic, deleterious, or otherwise unsuitable materials. The general engineered fill materials should have:

1. At least 40% material less than ¼-inch in size;

2. A maximum size in the largest dimension of 3 inches;

3. Less than 50% of fines content passing sieve No. 200;

4. A plasticity index of less than 15, and a liquid limit of less than 40; and

5. An expansion index (ASTM D4829) of less than 50.

All general engineered fill should be scarified, plowed, disked, and/or bladed until it is heterogenous in particle size and free of large, unbroken clods of soil. Before placement of general engineered fill, the subgrade should be prepared in accordance with Section 5.2 above. General engineered fill should be placed in loose lifts no thicker than 8 inches, moisture conditioned and processed as necessary to achieve uniform moisture content at 0 to 3 percent above the optimum moisture content. Each lift should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, as determined by ASTM D 1557.

5.2.3 Structural Fill
Structural fill should be used beneath or against structures, including proposed concrete slab and flexible pavement sections. On-site or imported soils to be used as structural fill should be free of perishable, organic, deleterious, or otherwise unsuitable materials. The structural fill materials should have:

1. A maximum size in the largest dimension of 3 inches;

2. More than 85% material smaller than ¼-inch in size;

3. Less than 15% material passing sieve No. 200; and

4. An expansion index (ASTM D4829) of less than 20.

All structural fill should be scarified, plowed, disked, and/or bladed until it is heterogenous in particle size and free of large, unbroken clods of soil. Before placement of structural fill, the subgrade should be prepared in accordance with Section 5.2 above.

Structural fill should be placed in loose lifts no thicker than 8 inches, moisture conditioned and processed as necessary to achieve uniform moisture content at 0 to 3 SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 25 6/12/2025 percent above the optimum moisture content. Each lift should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction for general engineered fill as determined by ASTM D 1557.

5.2.4 Compaction Between Proposed Walls and Adjacent Structures For the undercrossing construction and considering the space between the existing structures and proposed undercrossing walls, we do not anticipate soil backfill at these locations, and therefore, no anticipated compaction work near existing adjacent structures. However, if compaction is required near existing adjacent structures, it is recommended that light compacting equipment (e.g., handheld compactor, jumping jack, or small vibratory plate compactor) should be used to avoid displacing or damaging existing structures. The project geotechnical engineer should review and approve the compaction methods to be used for grading the proposed undercrossing near adjacent structures.

Compacted fill should not be placed during a rain event. No ponded water should be allowed inside the excavation before compaction. Water ingress to excavations should be avoided, and if water enters the excavation, it should be removed.

5.3 Surface Drainage
In general, the surface drainage of the bikeway alignment should be designed to avoid ponding and control and convey surface water to an existing or new drainage system. Due to the configuration of the proposed undercrossing (i.e., positive and negative longitudinal slopes), water ponding may occur during construction and operational phases of the project. Surface drainage of the undercrossing should be carefully designed and constructed to control surface water to be properly collected and conveyed. We understand that surface water is planned to be conveyed to the existing SJC channel as part of a proposed drainage system.

If water ponds during construction and grading of the undercrossing, pumping the water from the bottom of excavation may be necessary and should also be properly collected and conveyed to properly designed and approved storm drainage devices near the site.

Based on our conversation with the structural engineer, we also understand that the subsurface stormwater on the proposed undercrossing will drain in one way towards the existing SJC channel to avoid temporary inundation of the bikeway undercrossing. We recommend providing a non-woven geotextile around the drainage stormwater system to reduce clogging of drainage pipes. It is assumed that the structural and civil designers will discuss the drainage approach with USACE, since the channel is part of their jurisdiction.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 26 6/12/2025

5.4 Impact to Existing Adjacent Structures near Proposed Undercrossing To address potential impacts of the proposed undercrossing to adjacent structures (i.e., wall channel and bridge foundation), Geosyntec performed the following geotechnical analyses and evaluation of the impacted structures: Caltrans SR-71 bridge foundations and SJC channel walls.

5.4.1 Evaluation of Existing Caltrans SR-71 Bridge Foundation As discussed in the subsurface conditions section of the report, Geosyntec understands the existing bridge foundations are supported on competent native soils with an allowable soil bearing pressure of 4 ksf (Figure 3B) and backfilled with structural backfill to the existing ground surface. Due to the planned removal and excavation of soils in front of Abutment No.2 to construct the proposed undercrossing, vertical and lateral capacity of the bridge abutment foundation will be impacted. We understand that the structural engineer will perform assessment of the existing bridge foundation considering the temporary and post construction conditions. Geosyntec performed geotechnical analyses to develop recommendations in support of the structural assessment.

Geosyntec calculated bearing capacity using the Terzaghi methodology referenced in the Caltrans Foundation Manual [Caltrans, 2015] for the zero foundation embedment depth, which is consistent with the temporary and final conditions during and after new construction. Soil properties were selected based on SPT N-values using correlations presented in Caltrans Geotechnical Manual [Caltrans, 2021]. Based on the lower bound representative SPT N1,60 value of 17 the friction angle of 33 degrees and unit weight of 115 pcf were selected.

The calculated ultimate bearing capacity is 15.3 ksf. Allowable bearing capacity for temporary and permanent conditions is calculated as 5.1 and 6.1 ksf, respectively, by applying factors of safety of 3 and 2.5, respectively. For comparison, the review of the historic documents indicated that the allowable bearing capacity for the original bridge design was 4 ksf.

For calculating the active lateral earth pressure on the backside of the bridge abutment, Geosyntec used ϕ’=32 degrees and unit weight=120 pcf for existing level granular backfill materials on the backside of the bridge abutment. A friction angle between fill and abutment (δ) is also taken as 2/3 of ϕ’ (i.e., 21 degrees). A triangular distribution with an equivalent fluid weight of 34 pcf can be used for the active lateral earth pressure on the backside of the bridge abutment. Lateral loads on the foundation can be resisted with the ultimate base friction coefficient of 0.65. Factor of safety of 1.5 should be applied to ultimate base friction. No passive resistance should be used considering that foundation will not have significant embedment compared to the bottom of the new bikeway structure.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 27 6/12/2025

5.4.2 Evaluation of Existing SJC Channel
Based on the 90% design plans, final clearance between the existing channel wall and the proposed undercrossing wall will be approximately 9-inch. We understand that the excavation will not extend to the bottom of the existing channel and that the existing backfill wall materials will be partially removed, as shown in Figure 2.

The loss of resistance because of the removal of the channel wall backfill soils will need to be compensated by the capacity of the new undercrossing wall (i.e., the new undercrossing wall should be designed for hydrostatic load transfer from the channel wall) loading and the gap between the two must be adequately infilled to ensure load transfer. The new undercrossing wall should have adequate stiffness and strength to support the channel wall once construction is completed. Temporary conditions during construction when the backfill will be removed and the new undercrossing wall not yet constructed should be planned for a dry season. Additionally, emergency action plan, such as emergency backfill, should be in place in case of unseasonal weather is forecasted that may result in high flows.

Due to limited spacing between the adjacent existing structure and the proposed undercrossing wall, slurry backfill may be considered as backfill between the existing channel wall and the proposed undercrossing, as discussed in Section 5.8.

5.5 Uplift of Proposed Undercrossing Slab
As discussed earlier, based on our conversations with the structural engineer, the drainage of the undercrossing will consist of one-way drainage to drain stormwater to the channel.

It is our opinion that uplift pressures should not be generated as long as proper drainage features and the system are in place and operating at all times; However, an extreme scenario is considered that may consist of flow levels that increase to a point where drainage may not be sufficient to drain water back to the channel, and the undercrossing slab may be subjected to buoyancy.

If uplift resistance is necessary to achieve stability of the proposed bikeway undercrossing, it can be typically provided by installed elements such as tiedown anchors, driven piles, micropiles, or helical anchors. Tiedown anchors are likely to be the most cost-effective options for this site. Micropiles are a feasible option as well but more costly than tiedown anchors. Because soils at depth are very dense, installation of driven piles may meet refusal and require pre-drilling, and a helical anchor may not be able to penetrate these soils. The design approach to assess uplift capacity of tie-downs to resist hydrostatic uplift is presented in Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (1999) and is based on assessing the weight of the soil mass enclosed above the tie-downs. Geosyntec can provide additional micropile and helical anchor recommendations if uplift resistance is required.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 28 6/12/2025

5.6 Settlement
Geosyntec evaluated the anticipated settlement implication near the proposed undercrossing. Considering soils to be excavated to achieve target depths at the proposed bikeway undercrossing, a reduction of vertical stress on subsurface materials is anticipated at this location. Also, the proposed bikeway undercrossing path reinforced concrete is considered lightly loaded as compared to the vertical stress exerted by existing soil. Therefore, static settlement is not anticipated to be a concern after the proposed bikeway undercrossing is completed.

5.7 Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
A unit modulus of subgrade reaction for a square foundation measuring one foot by one foot can be assumed as 150 pounds per cubic inch (pci). For larger loading areas, the modulus of subgrade reaction can be estimated by the following equation:












+





 +
=

1.5 1 0.5
2B
B 1
k
2 1
L
B
k
where k1 is coefficient of subgrade reaction in units of pci of a square foundation measuring one foot by one foot, and B and L are width and length of the effective soil reaction area (i.e., loaded area) in units of feet, respectively.

5.8 Retaining Walls
For the construction of the undercrossing, we understand that once excavation of the undercrossing is completed, undercrossing walls and slab will be constructed. It is understood that no other retaining walls are planned as part of the bikeway alignment.

Lateral earth pressures resulting from the backfill between adjacent structures and the proposed undercrossing walls are presented in the section below. Considering the anticipated subsurface conditions at the bottom elevation of undercrossing walls, a unit friction coefficient of 0.40 is also recommended.

5.8.1 Lateral Earth Pressures
Table 7 provides earth pressure recommendations to consider for wall design based on anticipated granular backfill material. Geosyntec used ϕ’=32 degrees and unit weight=120 pcf for granular backfill materials to estimate the lateral earth pressures anticipated behind the proposed undercrossing walls. A friction angle between fill and wall (δ) was taken as 2/3 of ϕ’ (i.e., 21 degrees).

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 29 6/12/2025 Foundation walls and other walls in which horizontal movement is restricted at the top or designed such that the rotation is limited, should be designed for at-rest pressure.

Retaining walls free to move and rotate at the top can be designed for active pressure.

Furthermore, the 90% design plans also indicate that the bikeway undercrossing and the bottom of the associated concrete slab are planned approximately at the bottom elevation of the existing bridge foundation (i.e., EL.+769.14 ft NAVD88) between Sta. 92+00 to 92+50, and about 1 foot below the bottom elevation of the existing bridge foundation between Sta. 92+50 to 94+00 as shown in Figure 2. Considering a zone defined by an about 64-degree angle (i.e., 2Vertical:1Horizontal), and the 3 feet minimum clearance planned between the proposed undercrossing wall and the existing bridge foundation, we understand that the existing bridge foundation will not exert additional lateral pressures to the proposed bikeway undercrossing structure under static conditions.

To simulate a potential channel flooding, differential hydrostatic conditions between levels on the channel should be considered for the wall design next to the channel.

Table 7 – Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaining Walls
Earth Pressure
Conditions
Earth Pressure
Coefficient
Groundwater Condition
Equivalent Fluid
Pressure (pcf)
Active 0.28
With Drainage System 34
Includes hydrostatic pressure 80
At-Rest 0.47
With Drainage System 57
Includes hydrostatic pressure 89
Passive Resistance 3.25
With Drainage System 390
Includes hydrostatic pressure 250
A relatively large movement may be required to mobilize the ultimate passive resistance; therefore, a factor of safety of 1.5 should be applied to the ultimate passive resistance values if significant lateral displacement is not desired.

Lateral earth pressures on walls for specific wall heights, surcharge conditions, or other conditions not described herein can be developed once details and construction procedures are available. Retaining walls without a drainage system should be designed assuming full hydrostatic pressure. If needed, lateral pressures due to uniform dead or live surface loading can be calculated using the at-rest or active earth pressure coefficient provided in Table 7, which is multiplied with added vertical pressure to calculate lateral pressures on the wall.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 30 6/12/2025

5.8.2 Retaining Wall Backfill
Retaining walls should be backfilled with well-graded and free draining non-expansive soils. Per our interpretation of subsurface conditions anticipated near the undercrossing, shallow on-site material may be suitable for the wall backfill. All retaining wall backfill should be placed and compacted under engineering-controlled conditions with compaction requirements, as described in Section 5.2. Care should be taken to avoid overcompaction of the soils behind the retaining walls, and the use of heavy compaction equipment should be avoided, as described in Section 5.2. Due to space limitations for compacting wall backfill, slurry backfill is anticipated to be used.

5.8.3 Sand-Slurry Backfill
Depending on the construction process of the undercrossing, backfill with soil may not be feasible due to limited space, such as at those between the proposed undercrossing walls and adjacent existing structures. At locations where compacted backfill can be difficult to achieve, sand-slurry backfill may be considered. Slurry cement backfill must conform to Section 19-3.02E of the Caltrans Standard Specifications.

Sand-cement slurry, also known as controlled density fill (CDF), or Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) in Section 201 of the Greenbook (latest edition) may be used to backfill localized areas where an alternative fill/backfill material to the compacted fill material is needed. Sand-cement slurry should not be used for mass backfilling of the over-excavations. Sand-cement slurry consists of a fluid, workable mixture of aggregate, Portland cement, fly ash, and water. It is an ideal backfill material when adequate room is limited or not available for conventional compaction equipment, or when settlement of the backfill must be minimized. No compaction is required to place sand-cement slurry; however, due to potential development of hydrostatic pressures behind walls, sand-slurry backfill should occur in maximum 2-foot lifts.

5.8.4 Seismic Loads
In accordance with the 2022 CBC, seismic loading is not required for retaining walls up to 6 feet in height. Taller walls are not expected. If walls 6 feet or more are required, the recommended seismic pressure applied as an added uniform horizontal pressure can be calculated as 18 H Rein pounds per square feet (psf) (where H is the height of the wall in feet) and should be added to at-rest earth pressure. This value was calculated using the Mononobe-Okabe method. The horizontal seismic coefficient used with the MononobeOkabe methods is taken as two-thirds of the design PGA, considering the potential restrained nature of the walls.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 31 6/12/2025

5.9 Pavement Design Recommendations
We understand that the bikeway alignment is planned to be a flexible pavement, with the exception of the proposed undercrossing that will consist of a concrete slab. Flexible pavement design is performed following the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. The project-specific traffic loading and pavement design criteria were not provided at the time of this report preparation. Geosyntec is providing pavement recommendations in Table 8 based on the following assumptions:
• A minimum Traffic Design Index (TI) of five approximately 7x103equivalent single axle loads (ESALs) was utilized following Caltrans Highway Design Manual Chapter 630 Flexible Pavement, Section 633, as the minimum value recommended.
• An R-value of 50 was selected based on testing performed on near-ground surface soils. The R value is a measure of resistance of soils to deformation under wheel loading and saturated soil conditions. The materials encountered near the ground surface primarily consist of Clayey Sands (SC) and Silty Sands (SM).

Table 8 –Pavement Design Recommendations
Traffic Design Index /
ESALs
Asphalt Concrete – AC
(in)
Class 2 Aggregate Base
(in)
Total Pavement
Thickness (in)
5 / 7x103 4 6 10
All aggregate base materials should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined per ASTM D1557. Pavement subgrade preparation and compacted fill requirements are provided in Sections 5.2.3 and 5.2.4 of this report.

Aggregate base courses (AB) should meet the gradation, material, and testing requirements of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. The R-value should be verified in the final design stage and during construction once the pavement subgrades are established. During construction, soil laboratory CBR tests should be performed on representative samples recovered from the finished subgrades to provide pavement subgrade parameters for use in the final pavement design. All pavement materials should be in accordance with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual.

5.10 Corrosivity of Onsite Soils
Corrosivity testing was performed on collected shallow samples during Phase I of the current investigation. As discussed earlier, due to the location of current exploration and the proximity of proposed undercrossing, collected samples may not be representative of soils at the proposed undercrossing. For the purpose of reporting results from the explored SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 32 6/12/2025 locations, Table 7 summarizes the results of testing performed on shallow samples collected near the proposed undercrossing.

Per the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Manual for Preparation of Geotechnical Reports (LACPW 2013), nearby shallow soils are considered corrosive to ferrous metals and/or deleterious to concrete if one or more of the following conditions exist: soluble sulfate concentrations are equal to or greater than 2,000 parts per million (ppm) in soil and 1,000 ppm in saturated soil; chloride content is greater than 500 ppm; minimum resistivity is less than 1,000 ohm-cm; or the pH is 5.5 or less.

Table 9 – Summary of Soil Corrosivity Laboratory Test Results Boring
ID
Depth
(ft bgs)
USCS
CTM 417 CTM 422 CTM 643 CTM 643
Sulfates,
SO4
2-
(ppm)
Chlorides,
CL
(ppm)
Minimum
Resistivity
(Ohm-cm)
pH
B-1 0 to 5 feet SM 82 21 3,807 9.1
As indicated in Table 9, the measured range of sulfates, chlorides, minimum resistivity, and pH are outside the limits specified by the LACPW (2013) and thus, shallow soils near the proposed undercrossing at the explored locations are not considered corrosive to ferrous metals and deleterious to concrete. Additionally, per ACI 350-20 Section 4.2, the observed sulfate content is less than 150 ppm and corresponds to exposure class S0 (i.e., water-soluble sulfate concentration in contact with concrete is low and injurious sulfate attack is not a concern for soils explored near the proposed site). The minimum specified compressive strength of concrete for class S0 is 2,500 pounds per square inch (psi), and no type of restriction is required on the concrete mix for the proposed improvements.

However, due to the proximity of explored locations and proposed undercrossing, we recommend that structures be provided with corrosion protection. We also recommend that exposed subgrade soils at the location of the proposed bikeway undercrossing be tested once finished grades are achieved to assess corrosivity of onsite soils at the proposed subgrade elevations.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 33 6/12/2025

6. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS

6.1 Groundwater During Excavation
Based on the groundwater level observed during field exploration for this study, groundwater is not expected to be encountered during the excavation for the proposed undercrossing. Perched water conditions could occur on top of the lower permeability fine-grained layers. The contractor should verify groundwater levels prior to construction, and surface drainage recommendations should be followed as described in Section 4.

6.2 Construction Observation and Considerations
We recommend that a representative of the Geotechnical Engineer of Record review the subsurface conditions as they are exposed during construction, observe and test the site preparation and earthwork construction, observe the soil exposed in excavations, and assess whether subsurface conditions encountered throughout the site deviate significantly from those identified during our evaluation and were used as a basis for development of the recommendations contained herein. The Geotechnical Engineer of Record shall alert all parties of any unsuitable conditions related to the aspects discussed in this report.

Based on the field observations, additional recommendations may be provided regarding the suitability of soil and other materials for foundation support, compaction, import soil, etc. It is recommended that the Geotechnical Engineer of Record maintain a full-time, onsite presence for construction quality assurance (CQA) during earthwork operations.

In addition to the items identified in this report, the Geotechnical Engineer’s representative shall conduct observations and testing in accordance with the requirements of the building code and the building official.

6.3 Temporary Excavation Slopes
Based on our understanding of the undercrossing location, existing adjacent structures may be impacted to provide sloping setbacks for excavations. For preliminary planning, temporary cut slopes can be assumed to be no steeper than 1.5H:1V but may need to be flatter in areas of loose or unstable material. Heavy loads and stockpiling should not occur at the top of the slopes, unless specifically assessed by the temporary works designer. All temporary excavations shall conform to the requirements of CAL-OSHA (Title 8, Division 1, Subchapter 4, Article 6 “Excavations” Sections 1539 to 1547), as well as all specific worker safety requirements, as enforced by the local authority. The design of the temporary work is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor is directly responsible for the means and methods of all excavation and grading, including the sequencing of all temporary excavations and providing suitable methods for ingress and egress into all temporary excavations, as well as the training and safety of all employees.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 34 6/12/2025

7. LIMITATIONS
The work documented in this Report focuses on the evaluation of geotechnical characteristics of subgrade soils at the Site and development of geotechnical design recommendations for the proposed Project. The recommendations presented herein are based on the understanding of the proposed Project, as outlined in Section 1 of this Report. Geosyntec should be notified of any significant changes so that we may either confirm or modify our recommendations.

The Report and other materials resulting from Geosyntec’s efforts were prepared exclusively for use by Alta Planning + Design Inc. to support the design and construction of the proposed development. The Report is not intended to be used for other future improvements in the area and may not contain sufficient or appropriate information for such use. If this Report, or portions of this Report, are provided to contractors or included in the specifications, it should be understood that they are provided for information only.

Soil deposits may vary in type, strength, and many other important properties among points of exploration due to non-uniformity of the geologic formations or to man-made cut and fill operations. While Geosyntec cannot evaluate the consistency of the properties of materials in areas not explored, the conclusions drawn in this Report are based on the assumption that the data obtained in the field and laboratory are reasonably representative of field conditions and are conducive to interpolation and extrapolation.

Our investigation and evaluations were performed using generally accepted engineering approaches and principles available at this time and the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable geotechnical engineers practicing in this area. No other representation, either expressed or implied, is included or intended in our report.

SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 35 6/12/2025

8. REFERENCES
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO (2020) LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition, 978-1-56051-732-2 Alta (2023) City of Pomona San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway 90% Conceptual Plan.

ASCE (2017), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE7-16), American Society of Civil Engineers.

ASCE (2022), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE7-22), American Society of Civil Engineers.

American Society for Testing and Materials, 2020, Annual Book of ASTM Standards.

Section 4 Construction, Volume 04.08 Soil and Rock.

CBC (2022), “2022 California Building Code,” California Building Standards Commission.

County of Los Angeles Building Code (2023) – Title 26.

California Geological Survey (CGS) (2024), “Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation” CGS website, accessed June 2024.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/eqzapp/app/.

CGS (2018), “Earthquake Fault Zones, A Guide for Government Agencies, Property Owners,/Developers, and Geoscience Practitioners for Assessing Fault Rupture Hazards in California.” Special Publication 42.

Dibblee, T.W., and Minch, J.A., 2002. “Geologic Map of the San Dimas and Ontario Quadrangles, Los Angeles and San Bernadino Counties, California.” Dibblee Geological Foundation, Map DF-91, scale 1:24,000.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2024. “National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) for Geographic Information Systems (GIS)” (NFHL), accessed in 2024.

Federal Highway Administration (1999) Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4 Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works (2013) Manual for Preparation of Geotechnical Reports
State of California Highway Transportation Agency Department of Public Works Bridge Department Caltrans (1966) San Jose FC Channel Bridge Log of Test Borings
State of California Highway Transportation Agency Department of Public Works Bridge Department Caltrans (1972) San Jose F.C. Channel Bridge As-Built Plans
SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 36 6/12/2025 State of California Highway Transportation Agency Department of Public Works Bridge Department Caltrans (1972) As-Built SR-71 Bridge Plans State of California Department of Transportation Caltrans (2021) Ridgeway Street UC Log of Test Borings
State of California Department of Transportation Caltrans (2021) SR-71 Freeway Conversion Project Fact Sheet EA21031 (PM 0.5/1.8) & 21062 (PM 1.8/R4.7) State of California Department of Transportation Caltrans (2022) SR-71 Bridge Widening Plan
State of California Highway Transportation Agency Department of Public Works Bridge Department Caltrans (2021) Rosecrans Street Undercrossing Log of Test Borings
U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey, 1999, Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, accessed June 2024, from USGS web site:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/eqzapp/app/.

U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey, 2006, Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States, accessed June 2024, from USGS web site:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults/.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2024) Engineering and Design: Earthquake Analysis, Evaluation, and Design for Civil Works Projects. ER 1110-2-1806 U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey (2018) National Seismic Hazard Model
U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey (2023) National Seismic Hazard Model
SC1303/SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 6/12/2025

FIGURES

SITE VICINITY MAP

SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

POMONA, CA
June 2025
FIGURE
1 PROJECT NO: SC1303
\\orangecounty-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - San Jose Creek - Multi-Use Bikeway\08 - Geotechnical Report\Figures LEGEND Proposed San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Alignment Proposed San Jose Creek Multi-Use Bikeway Alignment and SR-71 Bridge Location Proposed SJC Bikeway Alignment
Proposed SR-71
Bikeway Undercrossing
Source: OpenStreet (openstreetmap.org) Accessed May 2024.

PROPOSED BIKEWAY UNDERCROSSING
SR-71 BRIDGE

SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

POMONA, CA
June 2025
FIGURE
2 \\orangecounty-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - San Jose Creek - Multi-Use Bikeway\08 - Geotechnical Report\Figures SOURCE: OBTAINED FROM CROSS SECTIONS IN 90% CONCEPT PLANS PROVIDED BY ALTA AND BENGAL. FIGURE ONLY SHOWS THE PROPOSED BIKEWAY UNDERCROSSING SR-71 BRIDGE. PROJECT NO: SC1303 PHOTO OF OLDER NON-OPERATING BRIDGE UNDER SR-71

BRIDGE (TAKEN BY BENGAL, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER)

NON-OPERATING

OLDER BRIDGE
SR-71 BRIDGE SOFFIT
LEGEND

EXISTING GROUND SURFACE

APPROXIMATE BOTTOM OF EXISTING
BRIDGE FOUNDATION EL. 767 FT NVGD29
(EL. 769.14 FT NAVD88) BASED ON ASBUILT INFORMATION (FIGURE 3A)

PROPOSED SLAB BOTTOM
Existing Embed.: 6 ft
Existing Embed.: 7.5 ft
APPROX. SR-71

BRIDGE EXTENT

PROPOSED BIKEWAY UNDERCROSSING

TYPICAL SECTION AT PROPOSED UNDERCROSSING AND

INTERPRETED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
EXISTING SR-71 BRIDGE FOUNDATION

SUPPORTING SOILS OF EXISTING

BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS

EXTENT OF STRUCTURAL BACKFILL

FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATION
ABUTMENT NO.2

INTERPRETED EXTENT OF GRANULAR BACKFILL FOR SJC CHANNEL WALL

PROPOSED UNDERCROSSING

EXISTING WEEP HOLE
EL.+767 (NGVD29)
EL.+769.14 (NAVD88)
EL.+757 (NAVD88)
AS-BUILT SR-71 BRIDGE PLANS

SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

POMONA, CA
June 2025
FIGURE
PROJECT NO: SC1303 3A
SOURCE: OBTAINED FROM CALTRANS SR-71 BRIDGE AS-BUILT RECORDS

APPROXIMATE BOTTOM OF EXISTING
BRIDGE FOUNDATION EL. 767 FT NGVD29
(ABUTMENT. NO. 2)
\\orangecounty-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - San Jose Creek - Multi-Use Bikeway\08 - Geotechnical Report\Figures AS-BUILT SR-71 BRIDGE PLANS

SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

POMONA, CA
June 2025
FIGURE
PROJECT NO: SC1303 3B
SOURCE: OBTAINED FROM CALTRANS SR-71 BRIDGE AS-BUILT RECORDS

APPROXIMATE BOTTOM OF EXISTING
BRIDGE FOUNDATION EL. 767 FT
(ABUT. NO. 2)
\\orangecounty-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - San Jose Creek - Multi-Use Bikeway\08 - Geotechnical Report\Figures

ALLOWABLE FOOTING
PRESSURE: 2 TSF (4 KSF)

BOTTOM OF EXISITNG
SR-71 FOUNDATION
EL.+767 FT NGVD29
P-1
P-3
P-2
CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS © 202

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF POMONA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF POMONA

CITY OF POMONA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF POMONA
P-4
P-5
P-6
PROJECT NO:

FIGURE
\\ORANGECOUNTY-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY\09 - PLANSET\PLANSET 90%\SC1303F-01 (BORING LOCATIONS - 90%) - Last Saved by: Farshad.Sisan on 1/31/25

BORING LOCATION PLAN I

SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA
SC1303
4A

N MATCHLINE A
0 200

SCALE IN FEET
N MATCHLINE A MATCHLINE B FIGURE 4B
LEGEND

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED PROPERTY RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED EASEMENT

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED STRUCTURAL WALL

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED CENTERLINE SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

APPROXIMATE BIKE PATH CENTERLINE

P-X PAVEMENT TEST PITS (CURRENT EXPLORATION)
NOTE:

SHOWN INFORMATION IS BASED ON SEPTEMBER 2022 SURVEY AND 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL PROVIDED BY ALTA DATED 12 NOVEMBER 2024.

June 2025

CITY OF POMONA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
P-7
P-8 P-19
PROJECT NO:

FIGURE
\\ORANGECOUNTY-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY\09 - PLANSET\PLANSET 90%\SC1303F-01 (BORING LOCATIONS - 90%) - Last Saved by: Farshad.Sisan on 1/31/25

BORING LOCATION PLAN II

SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA
SC1303
4B
N

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED PROPERTY RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED EASEMENT

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED STRUCTURAL WALL

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED CENTERLINE SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

APPROXIMATE BIKE PATH CENTERLINE
PAVEMENT TEST PITS (CURRENT EXPLORATION) MATCHLINE B FIGIRE 4A MATCHLINE C FIGURE 4C P-X
LEGEND
NOTE:

SHOWN INFORMATION IS BASED ON SEPTEMBER 2022 SURVEY AND 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL PROVIDED BY ALTA DATED 12 NOVEMBER 2024.

June 2025
B-2
P-9
P-10
B-1
B-1
B-3 B-4
A-20-001 B-2
A-20-002
PROJECT NO:

FIGURE
\\ORANGECOUNTY-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY\09 - PLANSET\PLANSET 90%\SC1303F-01 (BORING LOCATIONS - 90%) - Last Saved by: Farshad.Sisan on 1/31/25

BORING LOCATION PLAN II

SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA
SC1303
4C

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED PROPERTY RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED EASEMENT

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED STRUCTURAL WALL

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED CENTERLINE SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

APPROXIMATE BIKE PATH CENTERLINE
APPROXIMATE CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY (FROM CALTRANS SR-71
PRELIMINARY PLANS, 7/2/2010)

PAVEMENT TEST PITS (CURRENT EXPLORATION)
SR71 CROSSING BORINGS (CURRENT EXPLORATION)
LEGEND
N MATCHLINE C FIGURE 4B MATCHLINE D FIGURE 4D
0 200

SCALE IN FEET
P-X
B-X
HISTORICAL BORINGS (1966)
HISTORICAL BORINGS (2020)
NOTE:

SHOWN INFORMATION IS BASED ON SEPTEMBER 2022 SURVEY AND 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL PROVIDED BY ALTA DATED 12 NOVEMBER 2024.

June 2025
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
P-15
P-16
PROJECT NO:

FIGURE
\\ORANGECOUNTY-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY\09 - PLANSET\PLANSET 90%\SC1303F-01 (BORING LOCATIONS - 90%) - Last Saved by: Farshad.Sisan on 1/31/25

BORING LOCATION PLAN III

SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA
June 2025 SC1303
4D N MATCHLINE D FIGURE 4C MATCHLINE E MATCHLINE E MATCHLINE F FIGURE 4E N 0 200

LEGEND SCALE IN FEET

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED PROPERTY RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED EASEMENT

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED STRUCTURAL WALL

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED CENTERLINE SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

APPROXIMATE BIKE PATH CENTERLINE

P-X PAVEMENT TEST PITS (CURRENT EXPLORATION)
NOTE:

SHOWN INFORMATION IS BASED ON SEPTEMBER 2022 SURVEY AND 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL PROVIDED BY ALTA DATED 12 NOVEMBER 2024.

P-17
P-18

BORING CONTROL DATA

BORING ID
B-1
B-2
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-8

NORTHING
1845731.87
1845993.39
1840964.08
1841702.25
1842435.44
1842999.41
1843655.12
1844000.07
1844309.24
1844771.56

EASTING
6623130.11
6623825.93
6617492.69
6617917.73
6618493.54
6619018.09
6619568.05
6620353.52
6621199.74
6621838.76

BORING CONTROL DATA

BORING ID
P-9
P-10
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
P-15
P-16
P-17
P-18

NORTHING
1845779.67
1846272.81
1846442.12
1846603.32
1846910.81
1847141.88
1847321.94
1847376.64
1847728.85
1848130.25

EASTING
6623206.48
6624283.70
6625097.07
6625897.46
6626751.38
6627656.78
6628433.56
6629227.13
6630367.69
6631615.12

BORING CONTROL DATA

BORING ID
P-19

NORTHING
1845221.03

EASTING
6622389.64
PROJECT NO:

FIGURE
\\ORANGECOUNTY-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY\09 - PLANSET\PLANSET 90%\SC1303F-01 (BORING LOCATIONS - 90%) - Last Saved by: Farshad.Sisan on 1/31/25

BORING LOCATION PLAN IV

SAN JOSE CREEK - MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA
SC1303
4E MATCHLINE F FIGURE 4C
N
0 200

LEGEND SCALE IN FEET

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED PROPERTY RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED EASEMENT

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED STRUCTURAL WALL

APPROXIMATE SURVEYED CENTERLINE SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

APPROXIMATE BIKE PATH CENTERLINE

P-X PAVEMENT TEST PITS (CURRENT EXPLORATION)
NOTE:

SHOWN INFORMATION IS BASED ON SEPTEMBER 2022 SURVEY AND 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL PROVIDED BY ALTA DATED 12 NOVEMBER 2024.

June 2025

REGIONAL GEOLOGY MAP

SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

POMONA, CA
June 2025
FIGURE
5 PROJECT NO: SC1303
\\orangecounty-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - San Jose Creek - Multi-Use Bikeway\08 - Geotechnical Report\Figures Proposed SR-71 Bikeway
Undercrossing
Reference: Dibblee and Minch, J.A. 2002
Proposed SJC Bikeway Alignment

SEISMIC HAZARD ZONE MAP

SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY

POMONA, CA
June 2025
FIGURE
6 PROJECT NO: SC1303
\\orangecounty-01\DATA\PRJ4\CAWP\SC1303 - San Jose Creek - Multi-Use Bikeway\08 - Geotechnical Report\Figures Not to scale Liquefaction Hazard Area Source: California Geologic Survey (Accessed June 2024) LEGENDLandslide Hazard Area Proposed SR-71 Bikeway Undercrossing Proposed SJC Bikeway Alignment
SC1303/SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 6/12/2025

APPENDICES
SC1303/SC1303/SJC Bikeway Geotechnical Report_FINAL 6/12/2025 APPENDIX A – 90% Concept Plans
and Historical Information
90% Concept Plans Provided by Alta
San Jose Creek Bikeway

KELLOGG DR
S CAMPUS DR 10

AVE VALLEY BL

POMONA BL

CAMPUS DR
E

RIDGEWAY ST W HOLT AVE
W
TEMPLE

FAIRPLEX DR

DUDLEY ST

W ORANGE GROVE AVE

WEBER ST

GLEN AVE

VAL VISTA ST

N WHITE AVE

N HAMILITON BL
PAVILION DR 10
71 57 ORANGE FWY
CHINO
FWY

VALLEY SAN
FWY

BERNARDINO
MURCHISON AVE P O M O N A P O M O N A CAL POLY POMONA 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 CITY OF POMONA SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY - 90% SUBMITTALLOCATION MAP 1" = 1500' SHEET NO. DRAWING NO. CITY PLAN NO. DESCRIPTION 1 G000 FA - 2263 AA TITLE SHEET, INDEX OF SHEETS, GENERAL NOTES, LOCATION MAP 2 G001 FA - 2263 AB LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS
3 G002 FA - 2263 AC KEY PLAN 4-5 G003 - G004 FA - 2263 AD-AE TYPICAL SECTIONS 6-7 C050 - C051 FA - 2263 AF-AG ALIGNMENT GEOMETRY PLANS 8-28 C100 - C120 FA - 2263 AH-BB PLAN & PROFILE 29-44 C200 - C213 FA - 2263 BC-BR DETAIL SHEETS 45-54 SS100 - SS109 FA - 2263 BS-CB SIGNING AND STRIPING 55-56 C060 - C061 FA - 2263 CC-CD CIVIL AND STRIPING DETAILS 57 LG100 FA - 2263 CE TEMPLE AVE. GRADING PLANS 58-59 LH100 - LH101 FD - 24 AA-AB HARDSCAPE PLANS 60 LI001 FD - 24 AC IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES 61-63 LI100 - LI102 FD - 24 AD-AF IRRIGATION PLANS 64-65 LI200 - LI201 FD - 24 AG-AH IRRIGATION DETAILS 66 L001 FD - 24 AI PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES 67-69 L100 - L102 FD - 24 AJ-AL PLANTING PLANS 70-72 L200-L202 FD - 24 AM-AO PLANTING AND AMENITY DETAILS 73-78 T101-T106 FF - 374 AA-AF TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLANS 79-80 T107-T108 FE - 442 AA-AB STREET LIGHTING PLANS 81-90 T109-T118 FJ - 204 AA-AJ INTERSECTION SIGNING & STRIPING PLANS 91-93 S100-S102 FA - 2263 CF-CH SR-71 UNDERCROSSING PLAN 94-95 D100-D101 FC - 381 AA-AB SR-71 UNDERCROSSING DRAINAGE PLAN AND DETAILS INDEX OF SHEETS AT&T FLOYD DIZON 714-618-9126 CAL POLY UNIVERSITY BRUYN BEVANS 909-979-5517 CITY OF POMONA PUBLIC WORKS ARNOLD DICHOSA 909-620-2266 CITY OF POMONA WATER DISTRICT HYLE TANG 909-620-3753 CROWN CASTLE KELLY KLINEFELTER 724-743-6085 EXTENET SYSTEMS LLC KAVIN L. WILLIAMS 630-245-2120 FRONTIER RAY ROUNDTREE 714-375-6760 HP COMMUNICATIONS TONYA ATKINSON 909-532-1216 LEVEL 3 DANIEL GOETTE 800-871-9244 MCI/VERIZON STEVEN GALLO 949-253-8112 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT DAVID FONG 213-217-6094 SCE 800-655-4555 SO CAL GAS - DISTRIBUTION CHRISTOPHER KEEVERN 800-427-2200 SPECTRUM JAMES BIGGS 626-430-3337 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT VICENTE DE LA ROSA 909-595-1268 UTILITY COMPANY CONTACTS BEGIN PROJECT COORDINATES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE V, 1983 NAD (2017.50 EPOCH) BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE BEARING BETWEEN CALIFORNIA SPATIAL REFERENCE CENTER CONTINUOUS GPS STATIONS "SPMS" TO "LORS" BEING N29°08'55"E ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCH MARK "4G4924", DESCRIBED AS "L&LS 5411 TAG IN E CB 3.3FT N/O BCR @NE COR TEMPLE AVE
& SOUTH CAMPUS DR (NR
S END C.B." ELEV. = 706.184 FEET (NAVD 88) DATE OF SURVEY: SEPTEMBER 2022 SURVEY INFORMATION 1 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.12.2024 G000 TITLE SHEET. INDEX OF SHEETS, GENERAL NOTES, LOCATION MAP FA-2263 AA GENERAL STREET CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (THE GREENBOOK), STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (A.P.W.A. STANDARDS), AND STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF POMONA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 2. APPLICATION FOR EXCAVATION AND INSPECTION IN CONNECTION WITH WORK SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK. 3. WORK IN PUBLIC STREETS ONCE BEGUN SHALL BE PROSECUTED WITHOUT DELAY SO AS TO PROVIDE MINIMUM INCONVENIENCE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS AND THE TRAVELING PUBLIC. 4. TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA MUTCD. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT DUST CONTROL MEASURES AT ALL TIMES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IRRIGATION LINES AND SPRINKLER HEADS BEHIND EXISTING CURB. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ANY DAMAGED LINES AND SPRINKLER HEADS AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE TRAFFIC STRIPES, LEGENDS, LOOP DETECTORS AND MARKINGS DAMAGED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. TRAFFIC STRIPES, PAVEMENT LEGENDS, RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS AND LOOP DETECTORS SHALL BE PER THE 2014 CALIFORNIA MUTCD, CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS AND CALTRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 84, 85, AND 86, LATEST EDITIONS. 8. AS BUILTS OF THE COMPLETED PROJECT SHALL BE PREPARED BY CONTRACTOR AND BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL AFFECTED RESIDENCES IN WRITING AT LEAST TWO (2) FULL WORKING DAYS BEFORE ANY START OF CONSTRUCTION AS SPECIFIED. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (DIG ALERT) AT 811, TWO (2) FULL WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO START OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN VALID DIG ALERT REFERENCE NUMBER THROUGH THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT AS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL CENTERLINE SURVEY MONUMENTS AND CENTERLINE TIES AS SPECIFIED. 12. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT AND PRESERVE WATER QUALITY TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND CONVENIENCES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH ADEQUATE ACCESS TO DRIVEWAYS AT ALL TIMES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION AND PROTECTI0N OF ANY AND ALL SURFACE, SUBSURFACE, AND OVERHEAD LINES AND STRUCTURES. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK (CAT TRACK) THE TRAFFIC STRIPING LINES, STREET CENTERLINE, LANE LINES AND INTERSECTION LIMIT LINES/CROSSWALKS IMMEDIATELY AFTER HIS PAVING OPERATIONS AND PRIOR T0 OPENING THAT SECTION OF ROADWAY TO TRAFFIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING ALL REGULATORY AND WARNING SIGNS. 4. PRIME CONTRACTOR LICENSE REQUIRED: CLASS A OR C12. 5. FIELD DENSITY AFTER ROLLING OF ALL ASPHALT CONCRETE PLACED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 95 PERCENT RELATIVE COMPACTION. 6. DROP OFFS ON THE PAVEMENT OVER 1" IN HEIGHT THAT WILL REMAIN OVERNIGHT SHALL BE RAMPED WITH TEMPORARY AC PAVEMENT. 7. DO NOT COLD MILL OVER EXISTING MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LOCAL DEPRESSIONS, SIGNAL LOOP LEAD-INS, OR UTILITY COVERS. 8. ALL UTILITY MANHOLES AND WATER VALVE COVERS WITHIN THE PROPOSED AREAS OF WORK SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL BUSINESSES AND COORDINATE DELIVERIES EXCEPT AS APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. 10. NO TRENCHES MAY BE LEFT OPEN OVERNIGHT. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (USA) AS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK AND DURING THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CONDUCT ANY OPERATION OR PERFORM ANY WORK PERTAINING TO THE PROJECT BETWEEN 5:00 PM AND 7:00 AM ON ANY DAY NOR ON SATURDAY, SUNDAY; OR ANY HOLIDAY, EXCEPT AS APPROVED BY THE DIRECT0R OF PUBLIC WORKS. NO TRAFFIC LANES SHALL BE CLOSED BEFORE 8:30 AM OR AFTER 4:00 PM. 13. ALL PCC AND ASPHALT CONCRETE SHALL BE REMOVED TO A SAW CUT. 14. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL SUBSTRUCTURES WITHIN THE AGREEMENT OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IN THE EVENT OF ANY STRUCTURE DAMAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR THE TOTAL COST OF REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE SELF LEVELING PAVING MACHINE FOR ASPHALT SECTIONS. 16. CONSTRUCTION SURVEY AND STAKING SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR 17. ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, COMPACTION, AND ACCEPTANCE TESTING RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION WORK WILL BE DONE BY A LABORATORY APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE COST FOR THE TESTING SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CITY OF POMONA. 18. IF ANY EQUIPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE TO OCCUR WITHIN THE CHANNEL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETAIL THESE ACTIVITIES IN A RE-SUBMITTAL AND OUTLINE THE PROPOSED MEASURES TO PROTECT THE CHANNEL INVERT AND CHANNEL WALLS. 19. ANY DAMAGE TO USACE STRUCTURES SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. 20. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE BEFORE-CONSTRUCTION AND AFTER-CONSTRUCTION VIDEOS OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, ADJACENT TO AND INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL. SIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2014 CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA MUTCD), THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) STANDARDS PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (LATEST EDITION), AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND ALL ADDENDUM THERETO. 2. REFLECTORIZE ALL STRIPES AND LEGENDS. ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING, MARKINGS AND LEGENDS SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC (MINIMUM 0.15” THICK) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AND SHALL MATCH CITY STENCILS, OR CALTRANS STANDARDS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS FOR ALL STRIPING PERTAINING TO ON-STREET WORK. STRIPING, MARKINGS, AND LEGENDS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS A20A THRU A20D AND A24D THRU A24F. 3. EXISTING STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS THAT ARE IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REMOVED BY WET SAND BLASTING OR GRINDING AND DISPOSED OF PER SECTIONS 15-2.02 (B&C) AND 15-2.03 OF THE STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. BLACK OUT IS NOT PERMITTED. ALL DAMAGED PAVEMENT DUE TO REMOVALS SHALL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A SMOOTH AND UNIFORM SURFACE OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER. 4. TEMPORARY STRIPING, MARKINGS AND TABS SHALL BE APPLIED ON STREET WITH PAVEMENT SURFACE COURSE REPLACEMENTS PRIOR TO OPENING STREET TO THE PUBLIC. IN NO CASE SHALL A NEWLY (BASE OR FINAL) PAVED STREET OPEN TO THE PUBLIC BE LEFT UNSTRIPED OVERNIGHT. PERMANENT STRIPING & MARKING SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN TEN (10) TO FIFTEEN (15) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER INSTALLING THE FINAL PAVEMENT SURFACE. 5. ALL TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKERS/TABS SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROJECT. 6. ALL SIGNING, STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE CAT-TRACKED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO FINAL INSTALLATION. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-STRIPE EXISTING STRIPING, MARKING ALL INTERSECTING, AND JOINING STREETS WITHIN 100' OF LIMITS OF PROJECT. 8. PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS, ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING AND STENCILING WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA SHALL BE RESTORED TO LIKE NEW CONDITION, IN MANNER MEETING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRIPE EXISTING AND CURB MARKINGS OBLITERATED BY NEW CONSTRUCTION WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN ON PLANS AT NO COST TO THE CITY. 10. ALL EXISTING SIGNS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11. CLEARANCE FROM THE FINISHED GRADE TO THE BASE OF ALL SIGNS SHALL BE 7 FEET MINIMUM. 12. ALL SIGNS SHALL MEET THE 2014 CA MUTCD REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL HAVE 3M DIAMOND GRADE REFLECTIVE SHEETING (OR APPROVED EQUAL) AND 3M 1160 ANTI-GRAFFITI FILM (OR APPROVED EQUAL). 13. TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOOPS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL WITHIN FIVE (5) CALENDAR DAYS OF INSTALLING FINAL PAVEMENT SURFACE. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL TYPE DB 2-WAY BLUE REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS ADJACENT TO ALL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PER STATE AND CITY STANDARDS.. 15. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE STANDARD SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. SIGN LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. END PROJECT Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 ABAN ABANDONED AC, ACP ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT ADA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT APS ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL AVE AVENUE BC BEGIN CURVE BCR BEGIN CURB RETURN BEG BEGIN BLVD BOULEVARD BP BEGINNING PROJECT (ALIGNMENT) BVCE BEGINNING VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION BVCS BEGINNING VERTICAL CURVE STATION CA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALTRANS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CB CATCH BASIN C&G CURB AND GUTTER CF CURB FACE C/L, CL CENTER LINE CLR CLEAR CMB CRUSHED MISCELLANEOUS BASE CONC CONCRETE CON. CL CONSTRUCTION CENTERLINE COMM COMMUNICATION CPP CAL POLY POMONA CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CR CURB RAMP "D" DUDLEY ST CENTERLINE DI DRAINAGE INLET DG DECOMPOSED GRANITE DR DRIVE DWG DRAWING DWY DRIVEWAY (E), EX EXISTING EB EASTBOUND EC END CURVE ECR END CURB RETURN EG EXISTING GRADE EVCE END VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION EVCS END VERTICAL CURVE STATION EL ELEVATION EP, EOP END OF PROJECT (ALIGNMENT) EDGE OF PAVEMENT "F" FAIRPLEX DRIVE CENTERLINE FG FINISH GRADE FH FIRE HYDRANT FL FLOW LINE FS FINISH SURFACE FT FEET FWY FREEWAY "G" GLEN AVENUE CENTERLINE GB GRADE BREAK GM GAS METER GV GAS VALVE HORIZ HORIZONTAL HP HIGH POINT HT HEIGHT

INV INVERT ELEVATION ICV IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE
K RATE OF CURVATURE "K" KELLOGG DRIVE CENTERLINE LACFCD LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT LF LINEAL FOOT/FEET LP LOW POINT LIP LIP OF GUTTER LVC LENGTH OF VERTICAL CURVE LT LEFT "M" MURCHISON AVENUE CENTERLINE MAX MAXIMUM MCR MIDDLE CURB RETURN MIN MINIMUM MH MANHOLE MOD. MODIFIED MUTCD MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES N NORTH / NORTHING NTS NOT TO SCALE NO. NUMBER O/S OFFSET OC ON CENTER PB PULLBOX PC POINT OF CURVATURE PI POINT OF INTERSECTION PCC PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE PGL PROFILE GRADE LINE PP POWER POLE PIP PROTECT IN PLACE PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVE PT POINT OF TANGENCY PVI POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION R RADIUS "R" RIDGEWAY STREET CENTERLINE RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RRFB RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON RT RIGHT R/W RIGHT OF WAY S SOUTH, SLOPE SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SF SQUARE FOOT SHT SHEET SHLDR SHOULDER SJC CL SAN JOSE CREEK CENTERLINE SLPB STREET LIGHT PULLBOX SMH SEWER MANHOLE SPPWC STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION ST STREET STA STATION STD STANDARD SW SIDEWALK "T" TEMPLE AVENUE CENTERLINE TC TOP OF CURB CON. TRANSITION TS TRAFFIC SIGNAL TSPB TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULLBOX TYP TYPICAL TW TOP OF WALL UC, U/C UNDERCROSSING VERT VERTICAL "W" WEBER STREET CENTERLINE WB WESTBOUND WM WATER METER WV WATER VALVE W/ WITH LEGEND EXISTING ABBREVIATIONS 5-FT CONTOUR 1-FT CONTOUR LEGEND EXISTING UTILITIES (SIZE PER PLAN) SDSS W
W
G
G STORM DRAINAGE (SD) SANITARY SEWER (SS) WATER (W) SIGN GATE SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT WATER METER POWER POLE ELECTRIC PULL BOX COMMUNICATION BOX FENCE TREE / PALM MANHOLE - SANITARY MANHOLE - ELECTRIC MANHOLE - DRAINAGE PAVEMENT EDGE BOLLARD WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT VALVE VAULT TRAFFIC SIGNAL STREET LIGHT TRAFFIC SIGNAL w/ MAST ARM ROAD CENTERLINE NATURAL GAS (G) MANHOLE - TELE / COMM GUY WIRE ANCHOR BOX / RISER - UNKNOWN GAS VALVE CHANNEL CENTERLINE LEGEND PROPOSED W TEMPLE AVE 1C101 R / W SHEET REFERENCE STREET NAME RIGHT OF WAY SHEET WHERE DETAIL IS DRAWN DETAIL NUMBER PROPOSED PCC DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE 14' PATH WIDTH NOMINAL WIDTH SHOWN, ACTUAL WIDTH MAY VARY SLIGHTLY TO CONFORM TO EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS NORTH ARROW PATH CENTERLINE PROPOSED AC PATH EDGE, TYP CENTER LINE REMOVE AND INSTALL NEW SAFETY FENCE ON TOP OF (E) CHANNEL WALL LEGEND TYPICAL PLAN PROTECT-IN-PLACE (E) FENCE / WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LP

ESDSTU PM POST PPTR ER UR TSPB SIGN TS TS
T CPB
U
V

V WR WM

WWV FHGVGMEPB GRCO WATER RISER MANHOLE - UNKNOWN GAS METER GAS RISER TRAFFIC RISER ELECTRIC RISER / METER TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULL BOX MANHOLE - WATER RIGHT OF WAY BENCHMARK SPOT ELEVATION PATH EDGE TO MATCH EDGE OF (E) WALL 2 LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 G001 FA-2263 AB SS(ABAN) ABANDONED SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS.2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02.3 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.4 CONSTRUCT MODIFIED CURB RAMP PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-28-10, CASE PER PLAN. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.5 INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1.6 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN.78 RECONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN LID. REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4.9 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 10 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 1112 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 132-4. RECONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 1314 INSTALL PLANTING AND TRAIL AMENITIES PER SHEETS 66-72. INSTALL WATER SERVICE AND WATER METER FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES PER SHEETS 60-65. 15 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 10' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 1617 JOIN EXISTING, FEATURE PER PLAN. REMOVE AND REPLACE LACFCD CHANNEL MAINTENANCE ACCESS GATE. 1819 INSTALL NONWALKABLE SURFACE. 20 INSTALL HANDRAILING PER SPPWC STD PLAN 606-5. 21 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE BARRIER. 22 INSTALL PIPE GATE OR SIMILAR PER SPPWC STD PLAN 602-4. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: C100 - C120 PROPOSED DG PROPOSED PERMEABLE PAVERS NATIVE SOIL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE TRAFFIC SIGNAL GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2014 CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CA MUTCD), THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) STANDARDS PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (2015 EDITION), AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND ALL ADDENDUM THERETO. 2. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE STANDARD SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. SIGN LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ALL STRIPES, SIGNS, AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REFLECTORIZED. STENCILS FOR PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL MATCH CITY STANDARD STENCILS EXACTLY. ALL STRIPING, MARKING DETAILS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL MATCH CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS (IF ALLOWED) SHALL BE APPLIED IN TWO COATS. PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE APPLIED IN THERMOPLASTIC FORMAT, UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE. 5. ALL EXISTING SIGNS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. CONFLICTING SIGNS AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE REMOVED. ALL REMOVAL OF SIGNS AND MARKINGS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. ALL CONFLICTING STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKING SHALL BE REMOVED BY SANDBLASTING OR GRINDING AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. NEW CONDUCTOR CABLES SHALL BE USED FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL, AND STRANDED WIRES FOR SAFETY LIGHTS AND INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED STREET NAMES SIGNS (IISNS). 9. PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON SHALL CONFIRM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS. PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS SHALL BE LED PEDESTRIAN/HAND TYPE. TRAFFIC SIGNAL INDICATIONS SHALL BE 12” LENSES WITH METAL BACKPLATES AND VISORS, ETC. ALL INDICATIONS SHALL BE “LED” TYPE. IISNS SHALL BE RETROFITTED LED PER SPEC. 10. PRIOR TO BORING, JACKING OR TRENCHING OF ANY CONDUIT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITIES. NOTE: “TRENCHING IN PAVEMENT METHOD” IS NOT AN OPTION. ALL POT HOLES SHALL BE HAND DUG. SAW CUTTING POT HOLE LOCATIONS IS NOT AN OPTION. 11. THE CITY WILL PAY THE EDISON COMPANY, ALL APPROPRIATE SERVICE INSTALLATION CHARGES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE EDISON COMPANY FOR SERVICE CONNECTIONS. AT LEAST 48 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE EDISON COMPANY BY CONTACTING THEIR ENGINEER AT 909-592-3725. 12. ALL MATERIAL AND WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT CITY STANDARD PLANS AND THE STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF CALTRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 86. IF THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN CALTRANS AND CITY SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS WILL PREVAIL. 13. FINAL FIELD LOCATIONS OF ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 14. PULL BOXES SHALL BE NO. 6E, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. PULL BOXES SHALL BE CRISTY N36 ELECTRICAL BOX WITH FIBRELYTE LID WITH N90 BOLT DOWN KIT. 15. MINOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS ON THESE PLANS OR IN THE ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM PROVIDING A COMPLETE AND FULLY OPERATING SYSTEM. 16. EXISTING STREET LIGHTS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SALVAGED TO THE CITY YARD. CONTACT TRAFFIC OPERATIONS CREW CHIEF AT (909) 620-2395, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO DELIVERY. 17. SIGNS AND POSTS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SALVAGED TO CITY YARD. CONTACT PAINT AND SIGN SHOP AT (909) 620-2397, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO DELIVERY. 18. ALL EXISTING STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REPLACED ON ALL APPROACHES WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION. ALL STRIPING, MARKING DETAILS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL MATCH CITY STANDARD PLANS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS. ALL STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE IN THERMOPLASTIC UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19. GROUT THE BOTTOM OF ALL PULL BOXES, MINIMUM OF 2” THICK. SLOPE THE GROUT TO A 1 ½” DIAMETER DRAIN HOLE IN THE GROUT TO ALLOW WATER TO DRAIN THROUGH THE GROUT TO THE UNDERLYING CRUSHED ROCK. LACFCD EASEMENT PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PROPOSED COBBLESTONES DAYLIGHT LINE PROPOSED CMB INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 2 3 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST.
4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 5 6 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES: SS100-SS109 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: S100 PROPOSED CHAINLINK FENCE PROPOSED WIRE MESH FENCE © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS C100
C101
C102
C103
C104
C105
C106

W TEMPLE AVE

KELLOGG
57 - ORANGE FWY

S CAMPUS DR

S CAMPUS DR

KELLOGG PARK

SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL
DR

CORPORATE CENTER DR

OVERPASS
ICV
ICV
ICV

SD CBMH LID
LP SL
LP SL

SD CB MH LID
ICV
LP SL

ICV SD SDMH LID

SD CB MH LID
1T103 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
1L100
1 PLANTING LI100 IRRIGATION
1T112 SIGNING AND STRIPING
1T110 SIGNING AND STRIPING
1T102 TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOOTBRIDGE
1LI101 IRRIGATION

SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL
1L101 PLANTING
10+00
15+00
20+00
25+00
30+00
35+00
40+00
45+00
50+00
55+00
60+00
65+00
70+00
© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS C107
C108 C109 C110
C111
C112
C113
C114

RIDGEWAY ST
71 - CHINO VALLEY FWY

GLEN AVE

S CAMPUS DR

JOHN MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL

SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL
JOHN F. KENNEDY PARK

OVERPASS
1T107 STREET LIGHTING
1S100 UNDERCROSSING
1T113 SIGNING AND STRIPING
1T114 SIGNING AND STRIPING
1T115 SIGNING AND STRIPING
1T105 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
1T104 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
1D100 UNDERCROSSING DRAINAGE

FAIRPLEX DR
70+00
75+00
80+00
85+00
125+00
130+00
135+00
90+00
95+00
100+00
105+00
110+00
115+00 © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS C115 C116 C117 C118 C119 C120

MURCHISON AVE

N DUDLEY ST

WEBER ST CLEVELAND ST

SAN BERNARDINO FWY SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL CUL-DE-SAC CONNECTION

HAMILTON
BLVD
LP SL
LP SL
1T116 SIGNING AND STRIPING
1T117 SIGNING AND STRIPING
1T106 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
1T108 STREET LIGHTING
1L102 PLANTING
1LI102 IRRIGATION
1T118 SIGNING AND STRIPING
155+00
160+00
165+00
170+00
175+00
180+00
185+00
140+00
145+00 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 200' 100' 0 200' 400' 1" = 200'

MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW LEFT

MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE RIGHT

MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW LEFT
3 KEY PLAN PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 G002 FA-2263 AC

MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
TEMPLE AVENUE TO RIDGEWAY STREET STA 10+54.95 TO STA 23+74.54 STA 26+92.47 TO STA 30+53.56 STA 30+71.00 TO STA 86+40.16 NOT TO SCALE FAIRPLEX DRIVE TO GLEN AVENUE STA 121+40.40 TO STA 129+36.45 NOT TO SCALE FAIRPLEX DRIVE TO GLEN AVENUE STA 129+76.04 TO STA 134+53.67 GLEN AVENUE TO DUDLEY STREET STA 138+06.10 TO STA 148+24.72 NOT TO SCALE DUDLEY STREET TO WEBER STREET STA 153+50.00 TO STA 161+69.88 WEBER STREET TO MURCHISON AVENUE STA 164+42.49 TO STA 183+97.00 NOT TO SCALE DUDLEY STREET TO WEBER STREET STA 150+60.29 TO STA 153+50.00 NOT TO SCALE RIDGEWAY STREET TO FAIRPLEX DRIVE STA 90+63.95 TO STA 91+16.02 STA 96+00.00 TO STA 118+02.89 NOT TO SCALE 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7CONSTRUCTION NOTES PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT LEGENDPROPOSED PCC PAVEMENT NATIVE SOIL GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED DIMENSIONING AND OFFSETS ARE FROM THE EXISTING CHANNEL WALL. 2. TYPICAL SECTIONS DO NOT SHOW PATH ENTRANCE AND EXITS THAT TIE INTO EXISTING STREET AND SECTIONS THAT DO NOT ALIGN WITH THE CHANNEL WALL. ENTRANCE AND EXIT DETAILS ARE SHOWN ON CIVIL DETAIL SHEETS, SEE SHEETS 29 TO 44. 3. TYPICAL SECTIONS DO NOT SHOW PROPOSED AREAS BEYOND THE PATH SUCH AS INTERSECTIONS. IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTIONS ARE SHOWN ON CIVIL DETAIL SHEETS, SEE SEE SHEETS 29 TO 44. 4. TYPICAL SECTIONS DO NOT SHOW PROPOSED AREAS NEAR FIXED UTILITY STRUCTURES OR PROPOSED GATES. PATH DIVERSIONS FROM THE EXISTING WALL NEAR UTILITY FEATURES OR GATES ARE SHOWN ON CIVIL DETAIL SHEETS, SEE SHEETS SEE SHEETS 29 TO 44. 5. UNDERCROSSING SECTIONS ARE INCLUDED ON STRUCTURAL SHEETS 91 TO 93. 6. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CMB 4 TYPICAL SECTIONS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 G003 FA-2263 AD X

SAN JOSE CREEK
CENTERLINE LACFCD EASEMENT / R/W EG PIP. EX. CHANNEL WALL VAR. 32' - 177' PIP. EX. WALL OR FENCE (WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS) X VAR. 0' - 143' 10" TYP. 2 CON. CL 3:1 MAX 9' TRAVELED WAY 15' 13' BIKE PATH 2' SHLDR 1.5% WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS 7 1FS PGL 2' MATCH EX. 2' SHLDR SHOULDERS VAR. 0.5% - 5% MAX (TYP.) X 36' X 5'

SAN JOSE CREEK
CENTERLINE 3:1 MAX FS PGL WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS 7LACFCD EASEMENT / R/W CON. CL EG 1.5% PIP. EX. CHANNEL WALL PIP. EX. WALL OR FENCE (WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS) 2 9' TRAVELED WAY 13' BIKE PATH 14' 2' SHLDR MATCH EX. 1' 2' SHLDR 1 SHOULDERS VAR. 0.5% - 5% MAX (TYP.) X VAR. 35' - 36' VAR. 0' - 6'

SAN JOSE CREEK
CENTERLINE FS EG PGL CON. CL 3:1 MAX WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS 7LACFCD EASEMENT / R/W 1.5% 10' TRAVELED WAY 14' BIKE PATH 2' SHLDR 2' SHLDR X PIP. EX. CHANNEL WALL 2MATCH EX. PIP. EX. WALL OR FENCE (WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS) 1 SHOULDERS VAR. 0.5% - 5% MAX (TYP.) X LACFCD R/W 50' X VAR. 18' - 21'

SAN JOSE CREEK
CENTERLINE 3:1 MAX CON. CL EG PIP. EX. CHANNEL WALL2 1.5% 14' BIKE PATH 2' SHLDR 2' SHLDR 10' TRAVELED WAY FSPGL MATCH EX. SHOULDERS VAR. 0.5% - 5% MAX (TYP.) 1 X VAR. 30' - 46' X VAR. 1'-11'

SAN JOSE CREEK
CENTERLINE3:1 MAX CON. CL LACFCD R/W 2 FSPGL EG PIP. EX. CHANNEL WALL 1.5% PIP. EX. WALL OR FENCE (WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS) VAR. 13' - 14' BIKE PATH 2' SHLDR 2' SHLDR VAR. 9'-10' TRAVELED WAY 7 WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS MATCH EX. 1 SHOULDERS VAR. 0.5% - 5% MAX (TYP.) 33' X

SAN JOSE CREEK
CENTERLINE LACFCD R/W CON. CL FSPGL EG7 WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS X PIP. EX. CHANNEL WALL 1.5% 8' TRAVELED WAY 12' BIKE PATH 2 MATCH EX. 3:1 MAX 2' SHLDR VAR. 0' - 3' 2' SHLDR 1 SHOULDERS VAR. 0.5% - 5% MAX (TYP.) CORPORATE CENTER DR. TYPICAL DETAIL STA 69+41.47 TO STA 69+87.00 NOT TO SCALE 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7CONSTRUCTION NOTES PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT LEGENDPROPOSED PCC PAVEMENT GENERAL SHEET NOTES NATIVE SOIL PROPOSED CMB 1. ALL PROPOSED DIMENSIONING AND OFFSETS ARE FROM THE EXISTING CHANNEL WALL. 2. TYPICAL SECTIONS DO NOT SHOW PATH ENTRANCE AND EXITS THAT TIE INTO EXISTING STREET AND SECTIONS THAT DO NOT ALIGN WITH THE CHANNEL WALL. ENTRANCE AND EXIT DETAILS ARE SHOWN ON CIVIL DETAIL SHEETS, SEE SHEETS 29 TO 44. 3. TYPICAL SECTIONS DO NOT SHOW PROPOSED AREAS BEYOND THE PATH SUCH AS INTERSECTIONS. IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTIONS ARE SHOWN ON CIVIL DETAIL SHEETS, SEE SEE SHEETS 29 TO 44. 4. TYPICAL SECTIONS DO NOT SHOW PROPOSED AREAS NEAR FIXED UTILITY STRUCTURES OR PROPOSED GATES. PATH DIVERSIONS FROM THE EXISTING WALL NEAR UTILITY FEATURES OR GATES ARE SHOWN ON CIVIL DETAIL SHEETS, SEE SHEETS SEE SHEETS 29 TO 44. 5. UNDERCROSSING SECTIONS ARE INCLUDED ON STRUCTURAL SHEETS 91 TO 93. 6. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14 INSTALL PLANTING AND TRAIL AMENITIES PER SHEETS 66-72. INSTALL WATER SERVICE AND WATER METER FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES PER SHEETS 60-65. 15 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 10' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 1620 INSTALL HANDRAILING PER SPPWC STD PLAN 606-5. 21 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE BARRIER. 5 TYPICAL SECTIONS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 G004 FA-2263 AE X VAR. 35' - 36'

SAN JOSE CREEK
CENTERLINE FS PGL EG CON. CL LACFCD EASEMENT / R/W 1.5%10' BIKE PATH 3' SHLDR PIP. EX. CHANNEL WALL 16MATCH EX. 6.5' 3.5' 1' 6' RAMP MATCH EX. 3 3:1 MAX WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS 7 14 1' 21 3:1 MAX 15 1 20 SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL BP: 9+72.28 PI: 12+71.21
PI: 26+45.58
PI: 24+20.55
PC: 10+20.97
PC: 16+91.50
PC: 33+85.00
PC: 37+43.02
PC: 13+16.18
PC: 13+87.98
PT: 11+39.35
PT: 23+32.95
PT: 35+90.81
PT: 16+22.73 PT: 13+81.76
PCC: 13+53.32
PCC: 14+16.42
PRC: 10+66.93
PRC: 13+67.73 PRC: 14+02.01

W TEMPLE AVE

KELLOGG FOOTBRIDGE
DR
L1 L2
L3
L5
L8 L7 L6 L4 C1
C2 C9
C10 C3
C11
C8 C4 C5 C6 C7 BP: 10+00.00 EP: 11+60.00
PT: 189+08.46
EP: 191+56.70
L23
L24 SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL
EP: 119+77.20
PC: 99+39.60
PC: 115+92.56
PC: 118+52.89
PC: 90+53.96
PT: 106+60.03
PT: 116+91.76 PT: 119+32.53
PRC: 118+87.90
71 - CHINO VALLEY FWY
L20

FAIRPLEX DR
L21
L22
L19 C18
C19 C20
C21

OVERPASS
PC: 44+00.70
PC: 53+39.75
PC: 65+03.77
PT: 39+94.52
PT: 50+39.26
PT: 55+80.16
PT: 68+35.20
57 - UNDERCROSSING
ORANGE

FWY SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL
L9 L10 L11
C11
C12 C13
C14
OVERPASS SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL EP: 88+96.49
PI: 82+45.23
PI: 84+45.28
PI: 88+67.61
PC: 87+83.66
PT: 88+11.10 BP: 89+30.00 PC: 89+65.70
PT: 89+94.25
PC: 90+53.96
PT: 90+84.86 RIDGEWAY DR L12 L13 L14
L15
L16 C15 L17 L18
C16
C17

CORPORATE S CAMPUS DR
BP: 8+61.46
EP: 21+00.77
L25
CENTER
DR LINE TABLE Line # L1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9 Length 48.69 131.86 44.97 6.22 68.77 87.60 739.42 152.21 406.18 Direction N25° 27' 46"E N32° 55' 43"E N31° 44' 12"E N30° 24' 00"E N25° 44' 38"E N38° 19' 49"E N38° 19' 49"E N49° 03' 01"E N35° 57' 02"E Start Point STA 9+72.28 N: 1,840,667.67 E: 6,617,298.27 STA 11+39.35 N: 1,840,800.50 E: 6,617,396.22 STA 12+71.21 N: 1,840,911.17 E: 6,617,467.90 STA 13+81.76 N: 1,841,007.61 E: 6,617,520.82 STA 16+22.73 N: 1,841,217.08 E: 6,617,638.34 STA 23+32.95 N: 1,841,821.70 E: 6,618,007.80 STA 26+45.58 N: 1,842,048.41 E: 6,618,187.04 STA 35+90.81 N: 1,842,777.04 E: 6,618,787.58 STA 39+94.52 N: 1,843,061.82 E: 6,619,072.08 End Point STA 10+20.97 N: 1,840,711.64 E: 6,617,319.21 STA 12+71.21 N: 1,840,911.17 E: 6,617,467.90 STA 13+16.18 N: 1,840,949.42 E: 6,617,491.55 STA 13+87.98 N: 1,841,012.98 E: 6,617,523.97 STA 16+91.50 N: 1,841,279.03 E: 6,617,668.21 STA 24+20.55 N: 1,841,890.42 E: 6,618,062.13 STA 33+85.00 N: 1,842,628.44 E: 6,618,645.62 STA 37+43.02 N: 1,842,876.80 E: 6,618,902.54 STA 44+00.70 N: 1,843,390.64 E: 6,619,310.55 LINE TABLE Line # L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 Length 300.49 923.60 1,410.03 200.05 338.38 56.51 28.88 35.70 59.71 Direction N67° 44' 14"E N69° 46' 41"E N50° 47' 18"E N50° 36' 24"E N50° 41' 55"E N45° 27' 25"E N63° 30' 38"E N63° 51' 57"E N55° 41' 19"E Start Point STA 50+39.26 N: 1,843,780.10 E: 6,619,806.25 STA 55+80.16 N: 1,843,981.04 E: 6,620,308.40 STA 68+35.20 N: 1,844,463.83 E: 6,621,461.61 STA 82+45.23 N: 1,845,355.23 E: 6,622,554.12 STA 84+45.28 N: 1,845,482.19 E: 6,622,708.72 STA 88+11.10 N: 1,845,714.86 E: 6,622,990.98 STA 88+67.61 N: 1,845,754.49 E: 6,623,031.26 STA 89+30.00 N: 1,845,719.84 E: 6,623,080.79 STA 89+94.25 N: 1,845,749.92 E: 6,623,137.49 End Point STA 53+39.75 N: 1,843,893.94 E: 6,620,084.34 STA 65+03.77 N: 1,844,300.29 E: 6,621,175.08 STA 82+45.23 N: 1,845,355.23 E: 6,622,554.12 STA 84+45.28 N: 1,845,482.19 E: 6,622,708.72 STA 87+83.66 N: 1,845,696.52 E: 6,622,970.57 STA 88+67.61 N: 1,845,754.49 E: 6,623,031.26 STA 88+96.49 N: 1,845,767.37 E: 6,623,057.10 STA 89+65.70 N: 1,845,735.56 E: 6,623,112.85 STA 90+53.96 N: 1,845,783.58 E: 6,623,186.81 CURVE TABLE Curve # C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 Radius 100.00 220.00 2,920.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 2,920.00 2,920.00 Length 45.95 72.43 37.14 14.41 14.03 14.03 14.41 206.31 641.45 Chord Direction N38° 37' 37.36"E N42° 21' 35.51"E N31° 22' 20.48"E N20° 41' 18.03"E N20° 24' 53.85"E N40° 23' 06.45"E N40° 06' 42.27"E N27° 46' 04.91"E N32° 02' 13.75"E Start Point STA 10+20.97 N: 1,840,711.64 E: 6,617,319.21 STA 10+66.93 N: 1,840,747.22 E: 6,617,347.64 STA 13+16.18 N: 1,840,949.42 E: 6,617,491.55 STA 13+53.32 N: 1,840,981.13 E: 6,617,510.89 STA 13+67.73 N: 1,840,994.53 E: 6,617,515.95 STA 13+87.98 N: 1,841,012.98 E: 6,617,523.97 STA 14+02.01 N: 1,841,023.61 E: 6,617,533.01 STA 14+16.42 N: 1,841,034.57 E: 6,617,542.24 STA 16+91.50 N: 1,841,279.03 E: 6,617,668.21 End Point STA 10+66.93 N: 1,840,747.22 E: 6,617,347.64 STA 11+39.35 N: 1,840,800.50 E: 6,617,396.22 STA 13+53.32 N: 1,840,981.13 E: 6,617,510.89 STA 13+67.73 N: 1,840,994.53 E: 6,617,515.95 STA 13+81.76 N: 1,841,007.61 E: 6,617,520.82 STA 14+02.01 N: 1,841,023.61 E: 6,617,533.01 STA 14+16.42 N: 1,841,034.57 E: 6,617,542.24 STA 16+22.73 N: 1,841,217.08 E: 6,617,638.34 STA 23+32.95 N: 1,841,821.70 E: 6,618,007.80 Delta 26°19'42" 18°51'46" 0°43'44" 20°38'21" 20°05'33" 20°05'33" 20°38'21" 4°02'53" 12°35'11" LINE TABLE Line # L19 L20 L21 L22 L23 L24 L25 Length 854.74 932.53 161.13 44.66 248.24 160.00 1,239.31 Direction N64° 32' 25"E N80° 53' 16"E N76° 30' 55"E N86° 56' 50"E S64° 32' 14"E S51° 40' 11"E S26° 29' 22"E Start Point STA 90+84.86 N: 1,845,798.96 E: 6,623,213.58 STA 106+60.03 N: 1,846,379.74 E: 6,624,670.87 STA 116+91.76 N: 1,846,546.85 E: 6,625,688.89 STA 119+32.53 N: 1,846,605.72 E: 6,625,921.94 STA 189+08.46 N: 1,840,629.65 E: 6,617,383.96 STA 10+00.00 N: 1,842,013.46 E: 6,618,076.23 STA 8+61.46 N: 1,846,427.00 E: 6,622,728.38 End Point STA 99+39.60 N: 1,846,166.39 E: 6,623,985.31 STA 115+92.56 N: 1,846,527.42 E: 6,625,591.63 STA 118+52.89 N: 1,846,584.42 E: 6,625,845.58 STA 119+77.20 N: 1,846,608.10 E: 6,625,966.54 STA 191+56.70 N: 1,840,522.93 E: 6,617,608.09 STA 11+60.00 N: 1,841,914.23 E: 6,618,201.74 STA 21+00.77 N: 1,845,317.79 E: 6,623,281.15 CURVE TABLE Curve # C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 Radius 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,151.00 6,749.50 1,000.00 300.00 200.00 200.00 2,525.00 Length 205.81 251.50 638.55 240.41 331.43 27.45 28.54 30.90 720.43 Chord Direction N43° 41' 25.22"E N42° 30' 01.75"E N51° 50' 38.25"E N68° 45' 27.75"E N60° 16' 59.74"E N48° 04' 39.86"E N59° 46' 38.22"E N60° 06' 52.01"E N72° 42' 50.50"E Start Point STA 33+85.00 N: 1,842,628.44 E: 6,618,645.62 STA 37+43.02 N: 1,842,876.80 E: 6,618,902.54 STA 44+00.70 N: 1,843,390.64 E: 6,619,310.55 STA 53+39.75 N: 1,843,893.94 E: 6,620,084.34 STA 65+03.77 N: 1,844,300.29 E: 6,621,175.08 STA 87+83.66 N: 1,845,696.52 E: 6,622,970.57 STA 89+65.70 N: 1,845,735.56 E: 6,623,112.85 STA 90+53.96 N: 1,845,783.58 E: 6,623,186.81 STA 99+39.60 N: 1,846,166.39 E: 6,623,985.31 End Point STA 35+90.81 N: 1,842,777.04 E: 6,618,787.58 STA 39+94.52 N: 1,843,061.82 E: 6,619,072.08 STA 50+39.26 N: 1,843,780.10 E: 6,619,806.25 STA 55+80.16 N: 1,843,981.04 E: 6,620,308.40 STA 68+35.20 N: 1,844,463.83 E: 6,621,461.61 STA 88+11.10 N: 1,845,714.86 E: 6,622,990.98 STA 89+94.25 N: 1,845,749.92 E: 6,623,137.49 STA 90+84.86 N: 1,845,798.96 E: 6,623,213.58 STA 106+60.03 N: 1,846,379.74 E: 6,624,670.87 Delta 10°43'12" 13°05'59" 31°47'12" 2°02'27" 18°59'23" 5°14'31" 8°10'38" 8°51'06" 16°20'51" CURVE TABLE Curve # C19 C20 C21 C22 Radius 1,300.00 200.00 125.00 1,750.00 Length 99.21 35.00 44.64 687.54 Chord Direction N78° 42' 05.75"E N71° 30' 04.86"E N76° 43' 02.15"E S75° 47' 32.52"E Start Point STA 115+92.56 N: 1,846,527.42 E: 6,625,591.63 STA 118+52.89 N: 1,846,584.42 E: 6,625,845.58 STA 118+87.90 N: 1,846,595.52 E: 6,625,878.73 STA 182+20.92 N: 1,840,797.32 E: 6,616,721.73 End Point STA 116+91.76 N: 1,846,546.85 E: 6,625,688.89 STA 118+87.90 N: 1,846,595.52 E: 6,625,878.73 STA 119+32.53 N: 1,846,605.72 E: 6,625,921.94 STA 189+08.46 N: 1,840,629.65 E: 6,617,383.96 Delta 4°22'21" 10°01'41" 20°27'36" 22°30'38" BP: 9+72.28 BP: 182+20.92 C22
W TEMPLE AVE 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 100' 50' 0 100' 200' 1" = 100' CURVE LENGTHS SHOWN MAY BE WITHIN +/- 0.01 FT OF NOTE: THE DIFFERENCE IN PC & PT STATIONS DUE TO ROUNDING. 6 ALIGNMENT GEOMETRY PLAN PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C050 FA-2263 AF

MATCHLINE A-A
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 051

MATCHLINE A-A

MATCHLINE B-B

MATCHLINE B-B

MATCHLINE C-C

MATCHLINE C-C

MATCHLINE D-D

MATCHLINE D-D
SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL BP: 119+79.72 EP: 149+90.43 PI: 120+12.66 PI: 136+13.39 PI: 129+28.83
PI: 129+76.04 PI: 149+52.58 PC: 120+64.35PC: 122+04.55
PC: 134+90.13 PC: 136+73.39 PC: 137+11.47 PC: 140+79.71 PC: 144+86.49 PC: 147+10.97 PC: 143+56.94 PT: 121+03.27 PT: 123+57.83 PT: 135+24.43 PT: 136+83.89 PT: 137+69.95 PT: 146+48.81 PT: 149+39.12 PT: 143+06.76 PT: 144+47.75 PCC: 141+87.61 PCC: 148+86.92 PRC: 143+94.45 BP: 150+20.03 PI: 150+51.63 PI: 150+57.80 PC: 150+83.71
PRC: 151+11.42
PT: 151+30.54
GLEN

N DUDLEY
FAIRPLEX DR L26 L27 L28 L32 L33 L34 L37 L38 L36 L35 L31 L29 L30 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C32 C33 C34 C29 C31 C30 L39 C35C36 BP: 14+07.96 EP: 17+90.22 PI: 15+99.09 BP: 10+88.50 L53 EP: 14+79.48
L54 L55 BP: 16+89.70 PI: 19+56.30 EP: 22+22.90 L51 L52
AVE
ST SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL PI: 163+36.15 PI: 163+00.54
PI: 151+79.05
PI: 156+70.38
PI: 157+20.38
PC: 161+82.21PC: 163+62.82
PC: 174+60.56
PC: 152+62.73
PC: 154+40.20 PT: 164+81.06
PT: 176+84.07
PT: 162+89.58
PT: 152+90.91
PT: 154+68.38 PRC: 162+58.28
WEBER
CLEVELAND ST L48 L49 L47 L46 L40 L41 L42 L43 L44 L45 C39 C41 C42 C40 C38 C35 C37 C36 BP: 9+19.53 EP: 12+17.98 PI: 11+48.05 L56 L57
ST EP: 185+77.27 PC: 183+98.46 PT: 185+49.83 PRC: 184+87.93 MURCHISONSAN BERNARDINO FWY SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL L50 L49 C44 C43 BP: 41+52.00 EP: 48+89.83 L58 AVE LINE TABLE Line # L26 L27 L28 L29 L30 L31 L32 L33 L34 L35 L36 Length 32.93 51.69 101.28 571.00 47.21 514.09 88.96 27.58 309.76 50.19 38.74 Direction N86° 57' 25"E N78° 55' 36"E N70° 00' 25"E N76° 16' 49"E N75° 40' 24"E N76° 16' 49"E N68° 25' 09"E S81° 39' 42"W N68° 15' 36"E N87° 52' 51"E N88° 47' 10"E Start Point STA 119+79.72 N: 1,846,703.00 E: 6,625,961.48 STA 120+12.66 N: 1,846,704.75 E: 6,625,994.37 STA 121+03.27 N: 1,846,725.09 E: 6,626,082.56 STA 123+57.83 N: 1,846,804.14 E: 6,626,324.36 STA 129+28.83 N: 1,846,939.57 E: 6,626,879.07 STA 129+76.04 N: 1,846,951.25 E: 6,626,924.81 STA 135+24.43 N: 1,847,083.57 E: 6,627,456.88 STA 136+83.89 N: 1,847,133.23 E: 6,627,608.03 STA 137+69.95 N: 1,847,152.37 E: 6,627,691.66 STA 143+06.76 N: 1,847,315.89 E: 6,628,199.99 STA 144+47.75 N: 1,847,322.39 E: 6,628,340.82 End Point STA 120+12.66 N: 1,846,704.75 E: 6,625,994.37 STA 120+64.35 N: 1,846,714.68 E: 6,626,045.10 STA 122+04.55 N: 1,846,759.72 E: 6,626,177.73 STA 129+28.83 N: 1,846,939.57 E: 6,626,879.07 STA 129+76.04 N: 1,846,951.25 E: 6,626,924.81 STA 134+90.13 N: 1,847,073.18 E: 6,627,424.22 STA 136+13.39 N: 1,847,116.29 E: 6,627,539.61 STA 137+11.47 N: 1,847,137.23 E: 6,627,635.32 STA 140+79.71 N: 1,847,267.10 E: 6,627,979.39 STA 143+56.94 N: 1,847,317.75 E: 6,628,250.15 STA 144+86.49 N: 1,847,323.21 E: 6,628,379.56 LINE TABLE Line # L37 L38 L39 L40 L41 L42 L43 L44 L45 L46 L47 Length 62.16 13.47 25.90 48.51 83.69 149.29 202.01 50.00 461.82 10.96 26.67 Direction S82° 45' 33"E N56° 28' 56"E N49° 20' 53"E N75° 37' 36"E N73° 44' 19"E N72° 07' 27"E N73° 44' 19"E N73° 27' 08"E N73° 44' 19"E N73° 36' 49"E N67° 54' 50"E Start Point STA 146+48.81 N: 1,847,314.68 E: 6,628,541.50 STA 149+39.12 N: 1,847,325.27 E: 6,628,827.65 STA 150+57.80 N: 1,847,277.83 E: 6,628,930.97 STA 151+30.54 N: 1,847,310.02 E: 6,628,994.19 STA 151+79.05 N: 1,847,322.07 E: 6,629,041.18 STA 152+90.91 N: 1,847,353.77 E: 6,629,148.45 STA 154+68.38 N: 1,847,407.86 E: 6,629,317.46 STA 156+70.38 N: 1,847,464.43 E: 6,629,511.39 STA 157+20.38 N: 1,847,478.67 E: 6,629,559.32 STA 162+89.58 N: 1,847,634.14 E: 6,630,106.78 STA 163+36.15 N: 1,847,650.32 E: 6,630,150.42 End Point STA 147+10.97 N: 1,847,306.85 E: 6,628,603.17 STA 149+52.58 N: 1,847,332.71 E: 6,628,838.88 STA 150+83.71 N: 1,847,294.71 E: 6,628,950.63 STA 151+79.05 N: 1,847,322.07 E: 6,629,041.18 STA 152+62.73 N: 1,847,345.50 E: 6,629,121.51 STA 154+40.20 N: 1,847,399.59 E: 6,629,290.53 STA 156+70.38 N: 1,847,464.43 E: 6,629,511.39 STA 157+20.38 N: 1,847,478.67 E: 6,629,559.32 STA 161+82.21 N: 1,847,607.99 E: 6,630,002.67 STA 163+00.54 N: 1,847,637.24 E: 6,630,117.30 STA 163+62.82 N: 1,847,660.34 E: 6,630,175.13 CURVE TABLE Curve # C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 C30 C31 C32 C33 Radius 250.00 1,400.00 250.00 100.00 250.00 750.00 600.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,100.00 650.00 Length 38.92 153.29 34.30 10.50 58.48 107.91 119.14 37.50 53.30 162.32 175.95 Chord Direction N74° 28' 00.67"E N73° 08' 37.06"E N72° 20' 58.99"E N78° 39' 11.17"E N74° 57' 39.17"E N72° 22' 54.54"E N82° 11' 32.25"E N86° 48' 23.78"E N87° 15' 33.07"E S86° 59' 11.44"E N89° 29' 09.64"E Start Point STA 120+64.35 N: 1,846,714.68 E: 6,626,045.10 STA 122+04.55 N: 1,846,759.72 E: 6,626,177.73 STA 134+90.13 N: 1,847,073.18 E: 6,627,424.22 STA 136+73.39 N: 1,847,131.17 E: 6,627,597.74 STA 137+11.47 N: 1,847,137.23 E: 6,627,635.32 STA 140+79.71 N: 1,847,267.10 E: 6,627,979.39 STA 141+87.61 N: 1,847,299.74 E: 6,628,082.15 STA 143+56.94 N: 1,847,317.75 E: 6,628,250.15 STA 143+94.45 N: 1,847,319.84 E: 6,628,287.59 STA 144+86.49 N: 1,847,323.21 E: 6,628,379.56 STA 147+10.97 N: 1,847,306.85 E: 6,628,603.17 End Point STA 121+03.27 N: 1,846,725.09 E: 6,626,082.56 STA 123+57.83 N: 1,846,804.14 E: 6,626,324.36 STA 135+24.43 N: 1,847,083.57 E: 6,627,456.88 STA 136+83.89 N: 1,847,133.23 E: 6,627,608.03 STA 137+69.95 N: 1,847,152.37 E: 6,627,691.66 STA 141+87.61 N: 1,847,299.74 E: 6,628,082.15 STA 143+06.76 N: 1,847,315.89 E: 6,628,199.99 STA 143+94.45 N: 1,847,319.84 E: 6,628,287.59 STA 144+47.75 N: 1,847,322.39 E: 6,628,340.82 STA 146+48.81 N: 1,847,314.68 E: 6,628,541.50 STA 148+86.92 N: 1,847,308.42 E: 6,628,778.58 Delta 8°55'11" 6°16'24" 7°51'40" 6°01'02" 13°24'06" 8°14'37" 11°22'38" 2°08'55" 3°03'14" 8°27'17" 15°30'35" CURVE TABLE Curve # C34 C35 C36 C37 C38 C39 C40 C41 C42 C43 C44 Radius 140.00 50.00 200.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 400.00 2,000.00 3,975.00 700.00 50.00 Length 52.19 27.71 19.12 28.18 28.18 76.07 31.30 118.24 223.51 89.47 61.90 Chord Direction N71° 03' 03.46"E N65° 13' 32.94"E N78° 21' 54.58"E N72° 55' 52.98"E N72° 55' 52.98"E N75° 55' 04.76"E N75° 51' 19.56"E N69° 36' 27.77"E N72° 54' 44.06"E N78° 11' 05.04"E N46° 22' 56.13"E Start Point STA 148+86.92 N: 1,847,308.42 E: 6,628,778.58 STA 150+83.71 N: 1,847,294.71 E: 6,628,950.63 STA 151+11.42 N: 1,847,306.17 E: 6,628,975.47 STA 152+62.73 N: 1,847,345.50 E: 6,629,121.51 STA 154+40.20 N: 1,847,399.59 E: 6,629,290.53 STA 161+82.21 N: 1,847,607.99 E: 6,630,002.67 STA 162+58.28 N: 1,847,626.50 E: 6,630,076.44 STA 163+62.82 N: 1,847,660.34 E: 6,630,175.13 STA 174+60.56 N: 1,848,015.56 E: 6,631,213.74 STA 183+98.46 N: 1,848,271.86 E: 6,632,115.84 STA 184+87.93 N: 1,848,290.16 E: 6,632,203.36 End Point STA 149+39.12 N: 1,847,325.27 E: 6,628,827.65 STA 151+11.42 N: 1,847,306.17 E: 6,628,975.47 STA 151+30.54 N: 1,847,310.02 E: 6,628,994.19 STA 152+90.91 N: 1,847,353.77 E: 6,629,148.45 STA 154+68.38 N: 1,847,407.86 E: 6,629,317.46 STA 162+58.28 N: 1,847,626.50 E: 6,630,076.44 STA 162+89.58 N: 1,847,634.14 E: 6,630,106.78 STA 164+81.06 N: 1,847,701.54 E: 6,630,285.94 STA 176+84.07 N: 1,848,081.22 E: 6,631,427.36 STA 184+87.93 N: 1,848,290.16 E: 6,632,203.36 STA 185+49.83 N: 1,848,330.19 E: 6,632,245.36 Delta 21°21'38" 31°45'20" 5°28'37" 1°36'52" 1°36'52" 4°21'31" 4°29'02" 3°23'15" 3°13'18" 7°19'24" 70°55'42" LINE TABLE Line # L48 L49 L50 L51 L52 L53 L54 L55 L56 L57 L58 Length 979.50 714.39 27.44 266.60 266.60 191.13 191.13 390.98 228.52 69.93 737.83 Direction N71° 18' 05"E N74° 31' 23"E N10° 55' 05"E S03° 03' 10"E S03° 03' 10"E S14° 21' 20"E S14° 21' 20"E N14° 21' 04"W S14° 24' 35"E S29° 46' 09"E S79° 04' 55"E Start Point STA 164+81.06 N: 1,847,701.54 E: 6,630,285.94 STA 176+84.07 N: 1,848,081.22 E: 6,631,427.36 STA 185+49.83 N: 1,848,330.19 E: 6,632,245.36 STA 16+89.70 N: 1,846,922.89 E: 6,625,949.76 STA 19+56.30 N: 1,846,656.66 E: 6,625,963.95 STA 14+07.96 N: 1,847,272.71 E: 6,627,530.36 STA 15+99.09 N: 1,847,087.55 E: 6,627,577.74 STA 10+88.50 N: 1,847,132.63 E: 6,628,929.13 STA 9+19.53 N: 1,847,862.03 E: 6,630,077.40 STA 11+48.05 N: 1,847,640.70 E: 6,630,134.26 STA 41+52.00 N: 1,848,471.67 E: 6,631,656.77 End Point STA 174+60.56 N: 1,848,015.56 E: 6,631,213.74 STA 183+98.46 N: 1,848,271.86 E: 6,632,115.84 STA 185+77.27 N: 1,848,357.13 E: 6,632,250.56 STA 19+56.30 N: 1,846,656.66 E: 6,625,963.95 STA 22+22.90 N: 1,846,390.44 E: 6,625,978.15 STA 15+99.09 N: 1,847,087.55 E: 6,627,577.74 STA 17+90.22 N: 1,846,902.39 E: 6,627,625.13 STA 14+79.48 N: 1,847,511.41 E: 6,628,832.22 STA 11+48.05 N: 1,847,640.70 E: 6,630,134.26 STA 12+17.98 N: 1,847,579.99 E: 6,630,168.99 STA 48+89.83 N: 1,848,331.92 E: 6,632,381.24 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 100' 50' 0 100' 200' 1" = 100' CURVE LENGTHS SHOWN MAY BE WITHIN +/- 0.01 FT OF NOTE: THE DIFFERENCE IN PC & PT STATIONS DUE TO ROUNDING. 7 ALIGNMENT GEOMETRY PLAN PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C051 FA-2263 AG MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C050

MATCHLINE E-E

MATCHLINE E-E

MATCHLINE F-F

MATCHLINE F-F
695 700 705 710 715 720 725 695 700 705 710 715 720 725 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00

W TEMPLE AVE
(706.8)
706.50
(703.5)
704.09
(704.5)
704.15
(704.9)
704.75
(705.2)
705.05
(705.6)
705.42
(705.8)
705.79
(706.2)
706.09
(706.6)
706.52
(707.0)
706.85
(707.3)
707.14
(707.5)
707.43
(707.8)
707.70
(708.2)
708.12
(708.6)
708.55
(708.9)
708.83 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L
GB: 16+00.00
EL 707.43 GB: 18+00.00 EL 708.83
GB: 16+50.00
EL 707.70
GB: 12+50.05
EL 705.05
GB: 14+60.00
EL 706.61
GB: 13+50.00
EL 705.79
GB: 14+12.00
EL 706.16
GB: 17+50.00
EL 708.55
PRC: 10+66.93
PT: 11+39.35
PI: 12+71.21
PC: 13+16.18
PCC: 13+53.32
PRC: 13+67.73
PT: 13+81.76
PC: 13+87.98
PRC: 14+02.01
PCC: 14+16.42
PT: 16+22.73
PC: 16+91.50 LVC: 20.00
BVCS: 10+28.53
BVCE: 706.91
EVCS: 10+48.53
EVCE: 706.57 PVI STA: 12+06.29 PVI EL: 704.84 K: 53.01 LVC: 40.00 BVCS: 11+86.29
BVCE: 704.60
EVCS: 12+26.29
HP: 12+26.29
EVCE: 704.94
704.94 0.58% 0.57% 0.53% 1.50% -4.90% 0.48% 1.23% 0.95% 0.74% 0.59% 0.85% PVI STA: 11+08.35 PVI EL: 703.64 K: 4.89 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 10+93.35
BVCE: 704.37
EVCS: 11+23.35
EVCE: 703.82
LP 11+17.33
703.79
6''G
6''G
6''G
6''G
6''G 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W
10''W RW RW RW
RW
RW TS TSNOSIGN SN SIGN SNTRD 8" TRD 6"
TRD 24" TRD 8"
TS
TSL
POSTGDP 6" POSTGDP 6"
MW ER ERSR 1.5" ER ERSR 2"
POSTGRP 6" POSTGRP 6" 709 707 705 704 706 707 706705 704 704 708 SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

W TEMPLE AVE S CAMPUS DR LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 13'
13' R / W
R / W
R / W 790+00 795+00 187+00 188+00
189+00
190+00
100' 2 3 CON. CL 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 PI: 12+71.21 PC: 10+20.97
PC: 16+91.50
PC: 13+16.18 PC: 13+87.98 PT: 11+39.35
PT: 16+22.73
PT: 13+81.76
PCC: 13+53.32 PCC: 14+16.42 PRC: 10+66.93 PRC: 13+67.73 PRC: 14+02.01 10+24.36 "CON. CL" BEG AC PATH D ACCESS GATE A CHANNEL WALL A CHAINLINK FENCE A CURB RAMP A UTILITY PIPE & BOLLARDS (2) "T" SJC CL MATCH LINE = STA 18+00 - SEE SHT C101 1 9 "CON. CL" 9+72.29 = "T" 188+14.71 15 14D TREE CITY R / W CPP R / W S CAMPUS DR C&G 17SW 17 UTIL PIPE A C&G 17 SW 17 SEE DETAIL 2 ON SHEET 29 4 10" W A 6" G A 14 D TREE 18 CPP R / WCPP R / W CPP R / W A 10" W D FENCE A TREES AC DIKE D SEE DETAIL 1 EX. BRIDGE ON SHEET 29 DECK 7 6" CF 6 TS A PB C D ACP 9 7 1' CF 9 13 11 CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 4 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) 14 INSTALL PLANTING AND TRAIL AMENITIES PER SHEETS 66-72. INSTALL WATER SERVICE AND WATER METER FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES PER SHEETS 60-65. 1517 JOIN EXISTING, FEATURE PER PLAN. REMOVE AND REPLACE LACFCD CHANNEL MAINTENANCE ACCESS GATE. 18DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES D REMOVE (AS NOTED) C ADJUST TO GRADE (AS NOTED) INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1. 6 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 11 RECONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 13 PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 8 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C100 PLAN & PROFILE BEGIN TO STA 18+00 FA-2263 AH 700 705 710 715 720 725 73018+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+0024+20.55 (708.9)
708.83
(709.3)
709.19
(709.7)
709.56
(710.1)
709.92
(710.2)
710.28
(710.6)
710.64
(711.1)
711.01
(711.5)
711.37
(711.9)
711.71
(712.3)
712.02
(712.6)
712.34
(712.8)
713.39
(714.0)
714.21 700 705 710 715 720 725 730 26+47.59 26+50 27+00 27+50 27+75 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L

KELLOGG DR
(715.1)
(714.8)
(715.2) 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 GB: 18+00.00 EL 708.83 GB: 21+80.00
EL 711.59
GB: 24+20.54
EL 714.41
GB: 26+47.59
EL 715.99
GB: 26+61.85
EL 716.13
PI: 24+20.55
PT: 23+32.95 PVI STA: 23+62.41 PVI EL: 713.85 K: 10.94 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 23+47.41
BVCE: 713.30
EVCS: 23+77.41
HP: 23+77.41
EVCE: 714.00
714.00 PVI STA: 26+93.45 PVI EL: 716.60 K: 5.06 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 26+78.45
BVCE: 716.38
EVCS: 27+08.45
HP: 26+85.90
EVCE: 715.93
716.43

0.65%
-4.45%

1.47%

0.97%

3.70%

0.73%

0.62%

0.96% PVI STA: 23+25.76 PVI EL: 712.50 K: 9.75 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 23+10.76
BVCE: 712.40
EVCS: 23+40.76
EVCE: 713.05
LP 23+10.76
712.40 PVI STA: 27+33.95 PVI EL: 714.79 K: 5.88 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 27+18.95
BVCE: 715.46
EVCS: 27+48.95
EVCE: 714.89
LP 27+45.11
714.88
715.99
716.24
714.90
4''SS
4''SS
4''SS
4''SS
8''W
8''W
8''W 8''W
10''W
10''W
10''W
18''SS
18''SS
18''SS
18''SS
TRD 30"
TRD 30"
SIGN
SN
ICV
ICV
TS

TSL TS TSNO
WV WV
TS
TSL
TS
TSNO

ICV S SMH LID
SIGN
SN
TRD 30"

SD CBMH LID
WV WV

WV WV WV WV
SIGN
SIGN
WV WV
LP SL
710 709
712
714
715
711
713
716 800+00 805+00
10+00 11+00 11+60

KELLOGG DR SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

S CAMPUS DR

LACFCD R / W

LACFCD R / W

LACFCD R / W

LACFCD R / W
13'
12'
100' CON. CL
18+00
19+00
20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 PI: 26+45.58 PI: 24+20.55 PI: 24+36.44 PI: 25+03.41 PI: 25+83.87 PI: 26+29.13 PT: 23+32.95 24+20.54 "CON. CL" SJC CL END AC PATH MATCH LINE = STA 18+00 - SEE SHT C100
MATCH LINE = STA 27+75 - SEE SHT C102 "K" "CON. CL" 25+38.40 = "K" 10+49.71 SEE DETAIL 3 ON SHEET 30 SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET 31

CPP R / W

CPP R / W

CPP R / W
CPP R / W 23+10.02 "CON. CL" END 6' HEIGHT FENCE BEG 10' HEIGHT FENCE 27+49.95 "CON. CL" END 10' HEIGHT FENCE BEG 6' HEIGHT FENCE 26+47.59 "CON. CL", BEG AC PATH 13' 22+00.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT BEG CURB, BEG TRANS.
22+10.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END TRANS. 711.81 FS 0" CF 711.87 FS 6" CF 712.37 TC, 2 1
4 3
6 9
6 4
9 13 13 10 10 12
1 11
7 1' CF ACCESS GATE/FENCED CR

D TS POLE

D TS POLE
D ICV
A

B ICV TSPB
D 11

D ACCESS GATE

C SDMH CR

D TS POLE

DTS POLE
D TSPB
D WV

A CHANNEL WALLA CHAINLINK FENCEA
C SMH
B ICV
7 6" CF

A TREE CASE C
5 CASE C
5 CHAINLINK FENCED

D CHAINLINK FENCE FENCE
D 16 TREE
D 16
A TREE
2 CASE C
5 TREE
A
C SIGN 8" W

A ELECTRICAL VAULTA
C SIGN
A 18" SS
A TREE 19
D ACP 19 ACP

D CHAINLINK FENCE
A TREE
A 10" W

A DRIVEWAYA
8 3
3 D FENCE CURB
D

D SW CONCRETE PAVEMENTD SW
DCURB
D CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02.3 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.4 CONSTRUCT MODIFIED CURB RAMP PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-28-10, CASE PER PLAN. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.5 INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1.6 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN.7 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 10 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 1112 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 132-4. REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4.9

A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED)

B RELOCATE (AS NOTED)
C ADJUST TO GRADE (AS NOTED) RECONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 13D REMOVE (AS NOTED) REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 10' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 1619 INSTALL NONWALKABLE SURFACE. CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES 8 RECONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN LID. PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 -

7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20'
0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 9 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.20.2024 C101 PLAN & PROFILE STA 18+00 TO STA 27+75 FA-2263 AI 705 710 715 720 725 730 73527+75 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00 30+40 (715.5)
715.23
(715.8)
715.56
(716.2)
715.94
(716.5)
716.32
(716.9)
716.85 700 705 710 715 720 725 730 FG @ C/L
BRIDGE 705 710 715 720 725 730 735 30+8431+00 31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00 35+50 36+00 GB: 28+40.00
EL 715.49
GB: 29+50.00
EL 716.32 EG @ C/L
(717.8)
717.77
(718.0)
717.86
(718.4)
718.03
(718.7)
718.38
(719.0)
718.72
(719.5)
719.12
(719.9)
719.78
(720.4)
720.34
(720.8)
720.68
(721.0)
720.81
(721.1)
720.91
PC: 33+85
PT: 35+90.81
GB: 31+90.00
EL 717.96 PVI STA: 34+66.67 PVI EL: 720.65 K: 108.44 LVC: 120.00 BVCS: 34+06.67
BVCE: 719.86
EVCS: 35+26.67
HP: 35+26.67
EVCE: 720.77
720.77 30+40 30+50 31+00 0.65% 0.76% (11.77%) 1.06% 1.31% 0.20% 0.68% (-10.24%) 0.27% LVC: 20.00 BVCS: 30+18.87
BVCE: 717.05
EVCS: 30+38.87
EVCE: 718.33 PVI STA: 33+40.00 PVI EL: 718.99 K: 48.23 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 33+25.00
BVCE: 718.89
EVCS: 33+55.00
EVCE: 719.19
LP 33+25.00
718.89 LVC: 20.00
BVCS: 30+84.00
BVCE: 718.73
EVCS: 31+04.00
EVCE: 717.74
SD SD SD SD SD 4''SS 4''SS 4''SS 4''SS 4''SS 4''SS
4''SS 4''SS SIGN SN SIGN SN 715 716 718 718 718 719 720 721 716 717 SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL S CAMPUS DR LACFCD R / W 13' 13' LACFCD R / W 810+00 815+00 100' 410 10 12
100' 9 9 2 1 CON. CL 11 CHAINLINK FENCE A 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 PC: 33+85.00 PT: 35+90.81 CHANNEL WALL A ACCESS GATE A 30+38.87 "CON. CL" END CONCRETE PAD JOIN EX CONCRETE PAD 30+84.00 "CON. CL" JOIN EX CONCRETE PAD BEG CONCRETE PAD SJC CL MATCH LINE = STA 27+75 - SEE SHT C101 MATCH LINE = STA 36+00 - SEE SHT C103 3 1' CF 7 7 1' CF SEE DETAIL 5 ON SHEET 32 31+04.00 "CON. CL" END CONCRETE PAD BEG AC PATH 12 12 CHAINLINK FENCEA LACFCD R / W CPP R / W LACFCD R / W CPP R / W FOOTBRIDGE A 4" SS UTILTY A 20 20 30+18.87 "CON. CL" END AC PATH BEG CONCRETE PAD 22 D D 22 D POSTS POSTS D 19 19 2 CHANNEL WALL A CONCRETE PAVEMENT A A CONCRETE PAVEMENT 29+50.03 "CON. CL" END 6' HEIGHT FENCE BEG 10' HEIGHT FENCE 31+74.97 "CON. CL" END 10' HEIGHT FENCE BEG 6' HEIGHT FENCE A TREE 16 16 35+00.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END TRANS. 720.78 FS 6" CF 720.73 FS 1" CF 721.73 TC, 34+90.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT BEG TRANS. 721.28 TC, 7 6" CF CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 4 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 1012 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 132-4. REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 11D REMOVE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 10' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 1620 INSTALL HANDRAILING PER SPPWC STD PLAN 606-5. 22 INSTALL PIPE GATE OR SIMILAR PER SPPWC STD PLAN 602-4. 19 INSTALL NONWALKABLE SURFACE. CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 10 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C102 PLAN & PROFILE STA 27+75 TO STA 36+00 FA-2263 AJ 710 715 720 725 730 735 740 710 715 720 725 730 735 740 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00 40+50 41+00 41+50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 45+00 (721.1)
720.91
(721.2)
721.14
(721.6)
721.46
(721.8)
721.72
(721.8)
721.67
(721.8)
721.79
(722.3)
722.17
(722.8)
722.83
(723.4)
723.49
(723.8)
723.90
(724.3)
724.28
(724.8)
724.65
(725.1)
725.02
(725.5)
725.34
(725.9)
725.65
(726.3)
726.02
(726.9)
726.57
(727.4)
727.13
(727.8)
727.58 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L
GB: 36+20.00
EL 720.95
GB: 39+00.00
EL 722.17
GB: 40+00.00
EL 723.49
GB: 40+50.00
EL 723.90
GB: 42+00.00
EL 725.02
GB: 44+80.00
EL 727.46
PC: 37+43.02
PT: 39+94.52
PC: 44+00.70 PVI STA: 37+48.50 PVI EL: 721.77 K: 59.88 LVC: 50.00 BVCS: 37+23.50
BVCE: 721.61
EVCS: 37+73.50
HP: 37+61.52
EVCE: 721.72
721.73 -0.20% 1.32% 0.82% 1.11% 0.63% 0.75% 0.82% 0.20% 0.64% PVI STA: 43+40.00 PVI EL: 725.91 K: 62.50 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 43+25.00
BVCE: 725.81
EVCS: 43+55.00
EVCE: 726.07
LP 43+25.00
725.81 PVI STA: 38+30.89 PVI EL: 721.60 K: 78.43 LVC: 80.00 BVCS: 37+90.89
BVCE: 721.68
EVCS: 38+70.89
EVCE: 721.93LP STA: 38+06.58 LP EL: 721.67
6''G
6''G
6''G
6''G POSTGRP 4" POSTGRP 4" 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 815+00 820+00 SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL S CAMPUS DR 13LACFCD R / W ' 13' LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 100'
100' 1 2 CON. CL A CHANNEL WALL A CHAINLINK FENCE SJC CL 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 PT: 35+90.81 PC: 37+43.02 PT: 39+94.52
PC: 44+00.70 MATCH LINE = STA 36+00 - SEE SHT C102
MATCH LINE = STA 45+00 - SEE SHT C104 7 6" CF 9 9 9 SEE DETAIL 6 ON SHEET 32 D CHAINKLINK FENCE A 6"G TREES / SHRUBS D CPP R / W CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9D REMOVE (AS NOTED) PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 11 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.9.2024 C103 PLAN & PROFILE STA 36+00 TO STA 45+00 FA-2263 AK 715 720 725 730 735 740 745 715 720 725 730 735 740 745 45+00 45+50 46+00 46+50 47+00 47+50 48+00 48+50 49+00 49+50 50+00 50+50 51+00 51+50 52+00 52+50 53+00 53+50 54+00 (727.8)
727.58
(728.2)
727.90
(728.5)
728.21
(728.8)
728.52
(729.1)
728.92
(729.4)
729.29
(729.8)
729.60
(730.2)
730.01
(730.5)
730.33
(730.9)
730.60
(731.1)
730.86
(731.4)
731.01
(731.6)
731.17
(731.6)
731.13
(731.6)
731.36
(731.9)
731.74
(732.3)
732.06
(732.6)
732.38
(733.0)
732.70 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L
GB: 46+70.00
EL 728.65
GB: 47+30.00
EL 729.20
GB: 47+80.00
EL 729.44
GB: 48+70.00
EL 730.17
GB: 50+00.00
EL 730.86
GB: 51+00.00
EL 731.17
GB: 52+00.00
EL 731.36
GB: 52+50.00
EL 731.74
PT: 50+39.26
PC: 53+39.75 0.63% 0.92% 0.48% -0.14% 0.52% 0.31% 0.76% 0.64% 0.82% 0.53% PVI STA: 51+50.00 PVI EL: 731.10 K: 60.48 LVC: 40.00 BVCS: 51+30.00
BVCE: 731.13
EVCS: 51+70.00
EVCE: 731.20
LP 51+38.39
731.12

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF POMONA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF POMONA 729 731 727 728 730 732 733 825+00 830+00 S CAMPUS DR KELLOGG PARK 13 LACFCD R / W ' 13' LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 1 100' 2 CON.CL CHAINLINK FENCEA A CHANNEL WALL 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00 PT: 50+39.26 PC: 53+39.75 MATCH LINE = STA 45+00 - SEE SHT C103 MATCH LINE = STA 54+00 - SEE SHT C105 SJC CL SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL 46+25.00 "CON.CL", 6.50' LT END CURB, END TRANS. 728.40 FS 0" CF 728.90 TC, 6" CF 7 6" CF 48+60.00 "CON.CL", 6.50' LT BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. 730.26 FS, 0" CF 9 CPP R / W SEE DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 33 LACFCD R / W 100' A SS D CHAINLINK FENCE 9 D TREE 46+15.06 "CON.CL", 6.50' LT BEG TRANS. 728.46 FS 48+70.00 "CON.CL", 6.50' LT END TRANS. 730.27 FS 1' CF 731.27 TC, 7 1' CF 51+45.00 "CON.CL" END AC PATH, BEG PCC 51+55.00 "CON.CL" END PCC, BEG AC PATH 3 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7D REMOVE (AS NOTED) REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 12 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.9.2024 C104 PLAN & PROFILE STA 45+00 TO STA 54+00 FA-2263 AL 720 725 730 735 740 745 750 720 725 730 735 740 745 750 54+00 54+50 55+00 55+50 56+00 56+50 57+00 57+50 58+00 58+50 59+00 59+50 60+00 60+50 61+00 61+50 62+00 62+50 63+00 (733.0)
732.70
(733.3)
733.02
(733.4)
733.34
(733.7)
733.66
(734.0)
733.97
(734.4)
734.25
(734.6)
734.52
(734.9)
734.81
(735.3)
735.11
(735.4)
735.42
(735.7)
735.69
(735.9)
735.96
(736.1)
736.09
(736.3)
736.23
(736.6)
736.52
(736.5)
736.51
(736.8)
736.64
(737.1)
737.05
(737.6)
737.49 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L
57 - ORANGE FWY UNDERCROSSING
GB: 56+00.00
EL 733.97
GB: 57+30.00
EL 734.68
GB: 58+50.00
EL 735.42
GB: 59+50.00
EL 735.96
GB: 60+60.00
EL 736.25
PT: 55+80.16 PVI STA: 61+10.00 PVI EL: 736.60 K: 32.74 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 60+95.00
BVCE: 736.49
EVCS: 61+25.00
HP: 61+17.44
EVCE: 736.56
736.57 0.69% 0.64% 0.54% 0.62% 0.27% -0.23% 0.84% 0.54% PVI STA: 61+77.25 PVI EL: 736.44 K: 60.91 LVC: 65.00 BVCS: 61+44.75
BVCE: 736.52
EVCS: 62+09.75
EVCE: 736.71LP STA: 61+58.82 LP EL: 736.50
12''SS 12''SS POSTGDP 4" POSTGDP 4" POSTGDP 4" POSTGDP 8" POSTGDP 8" TRD 15" MULTI BRANCH TRD 30" POSTGRP 8" POSTGRP 8" S SMH LID CITY OF POMONA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF POMONA 733 734 736 737 735 738 739 740 741 57 - ORANGE FWY SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL S CAMPUS DR
13 UNDERCROSSING '
13' LACFCD R / W 835+00 840+00 1 2
100' CON. CL 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 59+00 60+00 61+00 62+00 63+00 PT: 55+80.16 A CHAINLINK FENCE UTILITY PIPE & BOLLARDSA UTILITY PIPE & BOLLARDSA SJC CL MATCH LINE = STA 54+00 - SEE SHT C104
MATCH LINE = STA 63+00 - SEE SHT C106 1' CF 7 7 6" CF APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF UNDERCROSSING SEE DETAIL 8 ON SHEET 33 LACFCD R / W CPP R / W LACFCD R / W CALTRANS R/W CALTRANS R/W D CHAINLINK FENCE 9 9 9 TREES / SHRUBS D

85.5' SEE DETAIL 9 ON SHEET 34 TREES / SHRUBSD TREE D SHRUBS D CHAINLINK FENCE D 6" CF 7 59+25.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT BEG TRANS. 61+72.25 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END AC PATH, BEG PCC BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. 61+82.25 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END PCC, BEG AC PATH END TRANS. 59+35.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END CURB, END TRANS. 100' 3 736.02 FS 0" CF 736.42 TC, 735.92 FS 6" CFA CHANNEL WALL 1' CF 7 736.68 FS 0" CF 737.65 FS 6" CF 737.15 TC, 16 62+69.60 "CON. CL" END 6' HEIGHT FENCE BEG 10' HEIGHT FENCE CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7D REMOVE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 10' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 16 PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 13 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C105 PLAN & PROFILE STA 54+00 TO STA 63+00 FA-2263 AM 730 735 740 745 750 755 760 730 735 740 745 750 755 760 63+00 63+50 64+00 64+50 65+00 65+50 66+00 66+50 67+00 67+50 68+00 68+50 69+00 69+50 70+00 70+50 71+00 71+50 72+00 (737.6)
737.49
(737.9)
739.36
(738.5)
741.43
(739.4)
741.77
(739.3)
739.99
(739.6)
739.56
(740.0)
739.95
(740.5)
740.49
(741.1)
741.06
(741.7)
741.64
(742.4)
742.33
(743.2)
743.10
(744.0)
743.87
(744.7)
744.73
(745.3)
745.76
(746.3)
747.28
(746.9)
748.05
(747.0)
747.32
(747.4)
747.07 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L
(E) UTILITY
(E) UTILITY
GB: 65+70.00
EL 739.66
GB: 66+20.00
EL 740.14
GB: 67+70.00
EL 741.87
GB: 69+00.00
EL 743.87
PC: 65+03.77
PT: 68+35.20 PVI STA: 63+98.60 PVI EL: 741.55 K: 7.50 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 63+83.60
BVCE: 740.87
EVCS: 64+13.60
HP: 64+13.60
EVCE: 741.62
741.62 PVI STA: 64+58.60 PVI EL: 741.85 K: 6.00 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 64+43.60
BVCE: 741.78
EVCS: 64+73.60
HP: 64+46.60
EVCE: 741.18
741.78 PVI STA: 69+71.19 PVI EL: 745.47 K: 8.00 LVC: 20.00 BVCS: 69+61.19
BVCE: 745.12
EVCS: 69+81.19
EVCE: 745.57PVI STA: 70+62.01 PVI EL: 747.86 K: 6.98 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 70+47.01
BVCE: 747.14
EVCS: 70+77.01
HP: 70+77.01
EVCE: 747.93
747.93 PVI STA: 71+22.01 PVI EL: 748.16 K: 8.57 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 71+07.01
BVCE: 748.08
EVCS: 71+37.01
HP: 71+11.29
EVCE: 747.71
748.09 0.96% 0.51% 1.15% 1.54% -4.50% 0.50% 4.50% -3.00% 4.80% 0.50% 1.02% 3.50% 1.00% 0.93% PVI STA: 65+13.56 PVI EL: 739.38 K: 5.99 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 64+98.56
BVCE: 740.05
EVCS: 65+28.56
EVCE: 739.45
LP 65+25.51 PVI STA: 63+09.70
739.45 PVI EL: 737.55 K: 8.19 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 62+94.70 BVCE: 737.42 EVCS: 63+24.70 EVCE: 738.22 LP 62+94.70 737.42 PVI STA: 71+68.22 PVI EL: 746.77 K: 7.63 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 71+53.22
BVCE: 747.22
EVCS: 71+83.22
EVCE: 746.91
LP 71+76.11
746.88 PVI STA: 70+23.10 PVI EL: 745.99 K: 5.26 LVC: 20.00 BVCS: 70+13.10 BVCE: 745.89
EVCS: 70+33.10
EVCE: 746.47 PVI STA: 69+35.67 PVI EL: 744.23 K: 12.09 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 69+20.67
BVCE: 744.08
EVCS: 69+50.67
EVCE: 744.75
LP 69+20.67
744.08 SD SD SD
SD
12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''SS
12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS SD S SMH LID GA TRD 24" TS TSSL TRD 18" S SMH LID SIGN SN TS TSSL TRD 18" LP SL V VAULT VENT D=1.5 SD CB MH LID ICV TS TSSLWV WM WV WM WV WM S SMH LID LP SL ICV ICV SD SDMH LIDWV WV WV WV WV WV SIGN SN SIGN SN FH FH SD CB MH LID TRD 24" TS TS 737 740 741 742 743 744 747 747 738 739 740 741 741740 744 747 748 748 SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL S CAMPUS DR S CAMPUS DR CORPORATE CENTER DR LACFCD R / W 13' LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 845+00 850+00 2 1 86' 72' CON. CL A CHAINLINK FENCE A CHANNEL WALLSJC CL 63+00 64+00 65+00 66+00 67+00 68+00 69+00 70+00 71+00 72+00 73+00 PC: 65+03.77 PT: 68+35.20 A TS POLE SMH A A TS POLE MATCH LINE = STA 63+00 - SEE SHT C105 MATCH LINE = STA 72+00 - SEE SHT C107 7 1' CF 9 D CHAINLINK FENCE A 12" SS 2 9 MOD. CASE A5 10 11 A 12" SS A SD 7 1' CF 3 14 9 FENCE A A 12" W TREE D A TREE SEE DETAIL 11 ON SHEET 35 D TREE 20 21 D TREE D TREE D TREE D SHRUBS 7 1' CF D SHRUBS TSPB A D CHAINLINK FENCE A TSPB 11 TSPB A SIGN B ' TS CABINETA TS POLE A CURB RAMPA APS POLEA TSPB A A TSPB A APS POLE A CURB RAMP 6" CF 7 1' CF 7 15 67+30.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. SEE DETAIL 10 ON SHEET 34 67+40.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END TRANS. 741.57 FS 0" CF 741.62 FS 6" CF 742.12 TC, 16 16 65+60.48 "CON. CL" END 10' HEIGHT FENCE BEG 6' HEIGHT FENCE 69+00.00 "CON. CL" END 6' HEIGHT FENCE BEG 10' HEIGHT FENCE 71+70.00 "CON. CL" END 10' HEIGHT FENCE BEG 6' HEIGHT FENCE CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT MODIFIED CURB RAMP PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-28-10, CASE PER PLAN. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 5 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 10A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) B RELOCATE (AS NOTED) D REMOVE (AS NOTED) REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 11 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 314 INSTALL PLANTING AND TRAIL AMENITIES PER SHEETS 66-72. 20 INSTALL HANDRAILING PER SPPWC STD PLAN 606-5. 21 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE BARRIER. INSTALL WATER SERVICE AND WATER METER FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES PER SHEETS 60-65. 15 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 10' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 16CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 14 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C106 PLAN & PROFILE STA 63+00 TO STA 72+00 FA-2263 AN 740 745 750 755 760 765 770 740 745 750 755 760 765 770 72+00 72+50 73+00 73+50 74+00 74+50 75+00 75+50 76+00 76+50 77+00 77+50 78+00 78+50 79+00 79+50 80+00 80+50 81+00 (747.4)
747.07
(747.9)
747.53
(748.3)
748.00
(748.8)
748.60
(749.3)
749.21
(749.7)
749.74
(750.3)
750.26
(751.1)
750.83
(751.7)
751.84
(752.5)
752.40
(753.1)
752.89
(751.9)
751.92
(753.9)
753.90
(754.4)
754.50
(754.9)
755.10
(755.5)
755.70
(756.1)
756.19
(756.6)
756.68
(757.1)
757.17 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L
GB: 74+70.00
EL 749.93
GB: 79+50.00
EL 755.70 GB: 81+00.00 EL 757.17
GB: 73+00.00
EL 748.00
GB: 74+20.00
EL 749.45 PVI STA: 76+02.26 PVI EL: 751.93 K: 23.15 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 75+87.26
BVCE: 751.58
EVCS: 76+17.26
HP: 76+17.26
EVCE: 752.07
752.07 PVI STA: 77+27.23 PVI EL: 753.16 K: 0.86 LVC: 10.00 BVCS: 77+22.23 BVCE: 753.11 EVCS: 77+32.23 EVCE: 752.63 HP: 77+23.08 753.12 PVI STA: 77+84.89 PVI EL: 753.72 K: 0.83 LVC: 10.00 BVCS: 77+79.89 BVCE: 753.06 EVCS: 77+89.89 EVCE: 753.78 HP: 77+89.89 753.78 0.96% 1.11% 2.28% 1.33% 13.24% 0.99% 1.20% 0.98% -10.63% 0.93% 1.21% PVI STA: 75+57.56 PVI EL: 750.90 K: 25.61 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 75+42.56
BVCE: 750.74
EVCS: 75+72.56
EVCE: 751.25
LP 75+42.56
750.74 PVI STA: 77+73.68 PVI EL: 752.24 K: 1.01 LVC: 12.00 BVCS: 77+67.68 BVCE: 752.16 EVCS: 77+79.68 EVCE: 753.03 LP STA: 77+67.68 LP EL: 752.16 HP STA: ??? HP EL: ??? PVI STA: 77+40.11 PVI EL: 751.79 K: 0.84 LVC: 10.00 BVCS: 77+35.11 BVCE: 752.32 EVCS: 77+45.11 EVCE: 751.86 LP 77+44.01 751.85 12''W GA 757 750 755 747 747 748 749 751 752 752 753 752 753 753 754 756 758 SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL S CAMPUS DR LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 13'
13' LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 850+00 855+00
72' 860+00 2 1
72'
79' CON. CL 72+00 73+00 74+00 75+00 76+00 77+00 78+00 79+00 80+00 81+00 CHAINLINK FENCE A CHANNEL WALL A SJC CL MATCH LINE = STA 72+00 - SEE SHT C106
MATCH LINE = STA 81+00 - SEE SHT C108 1' CF 7 SEE DETAIL 12 CMP (2) A ON SHEET 36 3 77+00.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END CURB, END TRANS. 76+90.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT BEG TRANS. 752.89 FS 1' CF 753.89 TC, 753.00 FS 0" CF CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 15 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.9.2024 C107 PLAN & PROFILE STA 72+00 TO STA 81+00 FA-2263 AO 750 755 760 765 770 775 780 750 755 760 765 770 775 780 81+00 81+50 82+00 82+50 83+00 83+50 84+00 84+50 85+00 85+50 86+00 86+50 87+00 (757.1)
757.17
(757.7)
757.74
(758.3)
758.31
(758.9)
758.88
(759.6)
759.41
(760.5)
760.64
(762.1)
762.23
(763.8)
763.93
(765.1)
765.33
(764.4)
764.30
(764.2)
764.40
(764.3)
764.60
(764.7)
764.82 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L
GB: 84+00.00
EL 762.23
GB: 86+10.00
EL 764.42
GB: 84+40.00
EL 763.61
GB: 84+60.00
EL 764.25 GB: 81+00.00 EL 757.17
GB: 82+70.00
EL 759.11
PI: 82+45.23
PI: 84+45.28 PVI STA: 85+07.83 PVI EL: 765.55 K: 1.24 LVC: 10.00 BVCS: 85+02.83 BVCE: 765.41 EVCS: 85+12.83 EVCE: 765.28 HP: 85+06.17 765.46 -5.38% 3.17% 0.99% 0.20% 2.70% 0.44% 3.47% 3.20% 1.14% PVI STA: 85+31.66 PVI EL: 764.26 K: 1.79 LVC: 10.00 BVCS: 85+26.66 BVCE: 764.53 EVCS: 85+36.66 EVCE: 764.27 LP 85+36.30 764.27 PVI STA: 83+15.81 PVI EL: 759.56 K: 13.78 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 83+00.81
BVCE: 759.41
EVCS: 83+30.81
EVCE: 760.04
LP 83+00.81
759.41 757 760 756 758 761 762 763 764 765 765 SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL S CAMPUS DR LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 13' LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 860+00 865+00
13' 2 1
86' 3 9 6 CON. CL 6" CF 7 80+00 81+00 82+00 83+00 84+00 85+00 86+00 87+00 CHAINLINK FENCEA CHANNEL WALLA SJC CL MATCH LINE = STA 81+00 - SEE SHT C107 84+50.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. 764.10 FS 0" CF SEE DETAIL 13 ON SHEET 36 CHAINLINK FENCED 18 OAK TREE OVERGROWTHA OAK TREE OVERGROWTHA OAK TREE OVERGROWTHA OAK TREEA OAK TREE OVERGROWTHD OAK TREEA 84+60.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END TRANS 764.85 TC, 6" CF 764.35 FS CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1. 6 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) REMOVE AND REPLACE LACFCD CHANNEL MAINTENANCE ACCESS GATE. 18D REMOVE (AS NOTED) PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 87+00 - SEE SHT C109 16 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C108 PLAN & PROFILE STA 81+00 TO STA 87+00 FA-2263 AP 760 765 770 775 780 785 790 89+00 89+50 90+00 90+50 91+00 91+50 92+00 92+50 93+00 93+50 94+00 94+50 95+00 95+50 96+00 760 765 770 775 780 785 79087+00 87+50 88+00 88+50 89+00 EG @ C/L UNDER BRIDGE BRIDGE SOFFIT 510.0' UNDERCROSSING RIDGEWAY ST VALLEY FWY 71 - CHINO EL: 780.5 EL: 779.2
CLR HT = -10.1 FT
(764.7)
764.82
(765.5)
765.55
(767.0)
767.05
(770.1)
770.62
(769.2)
769.58
(769.9)
769.81
(771.3)
770.99
(772.4)
771.01
(773.2)
770.44
(773.7)
770.08
(774.3)
769.73
(775.2)
769.38
(778.3)
769.03
(774.3)
769.85
(774.1)
771.85
(773.9)
772.94
(773.7)
773.34
CLR HT = -10.1 FT TOP OF CONC SLAB / FG @ C/L GB: 96+00.00 EL 773.34 GB: 91+95.18 EL 770.47 PC: 89+65.70
PT: 89+94.25
PC: 90+53.96
PT: 90+84.86
PC: 87+83.66 PT: 88+11.10 PVI STA: 95+21.64 PVI EL: 772.72 K: 15.58 LVC: 50.00 BVCS: 94+96.64
BVCE: 771.72
EVCS: 95+46.64
HP: 95+46.64
EVCE: 772.92
772.92 LVC: 20.00 BVCS: 89+60.61
BVCE: 770.83
EVCS: 89+80.61
EVCE: 770.51 PVI STA: 91+15.00 PVI EL: 771.43 K: 16.22 LVC: 60.00 BVCS: 90+85.00
BVCE: 770.68
EVCS: 91+45.00
EVCE: 771.07HP STA: 91+25.54 HP EL: 771.19 LVC: 20.00 BVCS: 88+42.12 BVCE: 770.06
EVCS: 88+62.12
EVCE: 771.09

8.26% 3.02% 4.00% 0.79% -4.75% 2.50% -1.20% -0.70% PVI STA: 88+07.97 PVI EL: 767.24 K: 5.73 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 87+92.97
BVCE: 766.79
EVCS: 88+22.97
EVCE: 768.48
LP 87+92.97
766.79PVI STA: 87+32.44 PVI EL: 764.97 K: 27.19 LVC: 70.00 BVCS: 86+97.44 BVCE: 764.81 EVCS: 87+67.44 EVCE: 766.02 LP 86+97.44 764.81 PVI STA: 94+25.01 PVI EL: 768.85 K: 10.63 LVC: 50.00 BVCS: 94+00.01
BVCE: 769.03
EVCS: 94+50.01
EVCE: 769.85
LP 94+07.49
769.00 PVI STA: 90+14.18 PVI EL: 768.91 K: 4.14 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 89+99.18
BVCE: 769.62
EVCS: 90+29.18
EVCE: 769.29
LP 90+18.83
769.16 CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 4 INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1. 6 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 10A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 11 RECONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 13CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES C ADJUST TO GRADE (AS NOTED) D REMOVE (AS NOTED) 19 INSTALL NONWALKABLE SURFACE. 8''G 8''G 8''G
8''G
8''W 8''W
8''W

SS(ABAN)

SS(ABAN)
10''SS
10''SS
12''W
12''W
21''W
21''W
21''W
21''W
10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 12''SS 12''SS SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) 8''SS 8''SS 10''SS 10''SS

SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN)

SS(ABAN)
8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 10''W
10''W

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH TRD 27" TRD 12"TRD 10" WV WV SIGN SIGN SIGN SIGN PP PPWC 1780519E GA GA ER ERSR 2" WM WM 36" TRD 36" TRD S SMH LID WV WV WV WV S S SMH LID SMH LID PP PP 1525002E GA GA 765 770 766 767768769771 770 770 771 771 770 769 770 771 772 773 775 776 777 778 865+00 870+00 875+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00
14'
12'

RIDGEWAY ST
71 - CHINO VALLEY FWY OVERPASS LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W R / W R / W R / W R / W R / W
R / W
R / W
12'
100'CON. CL
100'2 13 4 6 19 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00 95+00 96+00 PC: 89+65.70 PC: 90+53.96 PT: 89+94.25 PT: 90+84.86 89+62.50 "CON. CL" BEG AC PATH "R" A CHANNEL WALL A CHAINLINK FENCE D ACCESS GATE SJC CL 87+00 88+00 PI: 88+67.61 PC: 87+83.66 PT: 88+11.10 MATCH LINE = 96+00 - SEE SHT C110 13' 4 4 1011 WM C UTILITY POLEA COMM PB C 13 88+62.48 "CON. CL" END AC PATH 19 CON. CL LACFCD R / W 2 1 SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL "CON. CL" 89+30.00 = "CON. CL" 88+96.49 ="R" 15+98.46 "R" 16+51.57 A TSPB CHANNEL WALL A GATE A 21"W A 8"G A A 8"W,12"W 13 10 11 SEE DETAIL 15 ON SHEET 36 SEE DETAIL 14 ON SHEET 36 SEE DETAIL 16 ON SHEET 37 A 10"SS A SS(ABAN) A 10"W 96+00.00 "CON. CL"

END UNDERCROSSING
90+90.00 "CON. CL"
BEG UNDERCROSSING510' UNDERCROSSING SEE SHEET 91 FOR UNDERCROSSING DESIGN A UTILITY PIPE D AC DIKE AC DIKE D ACP D D ACCESS GATE ACP D A 8"W, 12"W A DRIVEWAY SCE CABINETA SIGN C 6" CF 7 D CHAINLINK FENCE PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 87+00 - SEE SHT C108 17 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C109 PLAN & PROFILE STA 87+00 TO STA 96+00 FA-2263 AQ 765 770 775 780 785 790 795 765 770 775 780 785 790 795 96+00 96+50 97+00 97+50 98+00 98+50 99+00 99+50 100+00 100+50 101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00 104+50 105+00 (773.7)
773.34
(773.9)
773.71
(774.3)
774.09
(774.7)
774.59
(775.0)
774.93
(775.6)
775.53
(776.2)
776.14
(776.7)
776.51
(777.1)
776.87
(777.5)
777.24
(778.0)
777.61
(778.5)
778.02
(778.8)
778.40
(779.2)
778.78
(779.4)
779.15
(779.7)
779.53
(780.1)
779.93
(780.5)
780.33
(780.9)
780.73 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L
GB: 99+00.00
EL 776.14
GB: 101+00.00
EL 777.61
GB: 101+50.00
EL 778.02
GB: 103+50.00
EL 779.53
GB: 97+00.00
EL 774.09
GB: 97+50.00
EL 774.59
GB: 98+00.00
EL 774.93 GB: 96+00.00 EL 773.34
PC: 99+39.60 1.20% 0.74% 0.82% 0.75% 0.80% 0.75% 1.00% 0.69% CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) SD SD SD SD 8''W
8''W 10''W 8''SS 8''SS OH GA GA GA GA GA GA GA GA GA SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL 774 775 776 777 779 778 780 781 14' 14' LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 875+00 880+00 100' 100' CON. CL 2 1 A CHAINLINK FENCE A CHANNEL WALL 96+00 97+00 98+00 99+00 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 PC: 99+39.60 SJC CLSAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL A WALL MATCH LINE = 96+00 - SEE SHT C109 MATCH LINE = 105+00 - SEE SHT C111 PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 18 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C110 PLAN & PROFILE STA 96+00 TO STA 105+00 FA-2263 AR 770 775 780 785 790 795 800 770 775 780 785 790 795 800 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00 108+50 109+00 109+50 110+00 110+50 111+00 111+50 112+00 112+50 113+00 113+50 114+00 (780.9)
780.73
(781.3)
781.13
(781.8)
781.59
(782.2)
782.05
(782.8)
782.51
(783.3)
782.97
(783.8)
783.42
(784.1)
783.86
(784.5)
784.28
(784.9)
784.69
(784.9)
784.75
(784.9)
784.50
(785.3)
784.88
(785.7)
785.33
(786.1)
785.89
(786.8)
786.45
(787.3)
787.04
(787.9)
787.63
(788.5)
788.22 FG @ C/L
GB: 111+50.00
EL 785.33
GB: 112+50.00
EL 786.45
GB: 105+50.00
EL 781.13
GB: 108+20.00
EL 783.61 GB: 114+00.00 EL 788.22
GB: 110+20.00
EL 784.69
PT: 106+60.03 EG @ C/L PVI STA: 109+67.88 PVI EL: 784.85 K: 43.99 LVC: 50.00 BVCS: 109+42.88
BVCE: 784.64
EVCS: 109+92.88
HP: 109+79.71
EVCE: 784.77
784.79 0.90% 1.11% 0.80% 0.92% 1.18% 0.84% -0.30% -0.80%PVI STA: 110+51.17 PVI EL: 784.44 K: 17.62 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 110+36.17
BVCE: 784.56
EVCS: 110+66.17
LP 110+50.27
EVCE: 784.58
784.50 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9D REMOVE (AS NOTED) GA GA GA 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 14'
14' SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 885+00 890+00 100'
100' CON. CL 2 1 105+00 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 PT: 106+60.03 A CHAINLINK FENCE A CHANNEL WALL SJC CL
MATCH LINE = 105+00 - SEE SHT C110
MATCH LINE = 114+00 - SEE SHT C112 9 D CHAINLINK FENCE 110+46.17 "CON. CL" END AC PATH, BEG PCC 110+56.17 "CON. CL" END PCC, BEG AC PATH 3 PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 19 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C111 PLAN & PROFILE STA 105+00 TO STA 114+00 FA-2263 AS 780 785 790 795 800 805 810114+00 114+50 115+00 115+50 116+00 116+50 117+00 117+50 118+00 118+50 119+00 119+50 (788.5)
788.22
(789.2)
788.86
(789.9)
789.51
(790.5)
790.15
(791.2)
790.87
(791.8)
791.58
(792.5)
792.13
(792.9)
792.73
(793.5)
793.30
(793.7)
793.82
(796.9)
796.95 EG @ C/L 780 785 790 795 800 805 810 119+50 120+00 120+50 121+00 121+50 122+00 122+50 123+00

FAIRPLEX DR
(795.3)
795.39
(796.2)
796.08
(796.9)
796.77
(797.6)
797.62
(798.4)
798.20
GB: 117+30.00
EL 792.46
GB: 115+50.00
EL 790.15
GB: 116+50.00
EL 791.58 GB: 114+00.00 EL 788.22
GB: 117+70.00
EL 792.99
GB: 119+35.20
EL 799.84
GB: 122+00.00
EL 796.77
PC: 115+92.56
PT: 116+91.76
PC: 118+52.89
PRC: 118+87.90
PT: 119+32.53
PC: 120+64.35
PT: 121+03.27
PC: 122+04.55 FG @ C/L PVI STA: 120+35.80 PVI EL: 798.88 K: 5.00 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 120+20.80
BVCE: 799.18
EVCS: 120+50.80
HP: 120+20.80
EVCE: 797.68
799.18 PVI STA: 122+70.00 PVI EL: 797.96 K: 32.40 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 122+55.00
BVCE: 797.71
EVCS: 122+85.00
HP: 122+85.00
EVCE: 798.08
798.08

1.09%

1.29%

1.43%

1.33%

1.02%

8.20%
-8.00%

1.38%

1.71% PVI STA: 118+63.41 PVI EL: 793.95 K: 4.18 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 118+48.41
BVCE: 793.80
EVCS: 118+78.41
LP 118+48.41
EVCE: 795.18
793.80PVI STA: 120+82.44 PVI EL: 795.15 K: 3.20 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 120+67.44
BVCE: 796.35
EVCS: 120+97.44
LP 120+93.03
EVCE: 795.36
795.33 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS.2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02.3 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.4 INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1.6 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN.7 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 10 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4.9 A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 11 RECONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 13

B RELOCATE (AS NOTED)

C ADJUST TO GRADE (AS NOTED)
D REMOVE (AS NOTED) 19 INSTALL NONWALKABLE SURFACE.
12''SS
8''SS
8''SS
12''SS
OH
OH
OH
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
ER ERSR 1"
PP
PP 2079687E
GA GA
SIGN
SIGN

S SMH LID
WV WV
WV WV
PP
PP 1100721E
GA
SIGN
SIGN
ER ERSR 2" ER ERSR 1" ER
GA
TRD 24" TRD 36"
POST
POST 1.5"
796
797
796
797
798
798
799
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
MATCH LINE = 114+00 - SEE SHT C111
14'

FAIRPLEX DR SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W
14'

R / W LACFCD R / W
R / W 895+00
900+00
18+00
19+00
20+00
21+00
100' CON. CL
2 1
3 19
4 10
100'
6 CHAINLINK FENCE

A CHANNEL WALL
A
119+77 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 118+00
119+00 PC: 115+92.56 PC: 118+52.89 PT: 116+91.76 PT: 119+32.53 PRC: 118+87.90 119+35.20 "CON. CL" END AC PATH 13 SLPB

C UTILITY PIPE & POST

A ACCESS GATE
D 11 "F"
120+00
121+00
122+00 123+00 SJC CL
R / W
R / W
13' LACFCD R / W
3 4
4 10 19
9 7 1' CF
6 11 11
B TSPB 13 13

D ACCESS GATE
B PULL BOX PI: 120+12.66 PC: 120+64.35 PC: 122+04.55 PT: 121+03.27 120+20.80 "CON. CL" BEG AC PATH MATCH LINE = 114+00 - SEE SHT C111 CON. CL JOHN MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL 2 1 "F" 19+09.90 "CON. CL" 119+79.72 = "CON. CL" 119+77.20 = SEE DETAIL 17 "F" 20+04.94 ON SHEET 37 SEE DETAIL 19 ON SHEET 38 SEE DETAIL 18 ON SHEET 38 ACP

D AC DIKE
D
A 12" SS

D ACP CHAINLINK FENCEA

A CHANNEL WALL

D AC DIKED CHAINLINK FENCE
A SLPB

D FENCE

A GUY WIRE FENCE
D TSPB
A JOHN F. KENNEDY PARK 6" CF
7 7 6" CF PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 -

7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20'
0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 123+00 - SEE SHT C113 20 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C112 PLAN & PROFILE STA 114+00 TO 123+00 FA-2263 AT 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 123+00 123+50 124+00 124+50 125+00 125+50 126+00 126+50 127+00 127+50 128+00 128+50 129+00 129+50 130+00 130+50 131+00 (798.4)
798.20
(798.6)
798.59
(799.1)
799.02
(799.7)
799.86
(800.1)
800.52
(800.8)
801.07
(801.5)
801.62
(802.2)
802.17
(802.8)
802.72
(803.3)
803.27
(804.1)
803.81
(804.5)
804.36
(805.0)
805.01
(805.7)
805.67
(806.3)
806.10
(806.8)
806.50
(807.3)
807.03 FG @ C/L
GB: 129+76.04
EL 805.95
GB: 130+30.00
EL 806.29
GB: 129+36.57
EL 805.53
GB: 128+70.00
EL 804.58
GB: 123+49.99
EL 798.59 PT: 123+57.83
PI: 129+28.83
PI: 129+76.04 EG @ C/L PVI STA: 124+60.00 PVI EL: 800.09 K: 26.05 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 124+45.00
BVCE: 799.75
EVCS: 124+75.00
HP: 124+75.00
EVCE: 800.25
800.25 1.05% 0.63% 1.43% 1.10% 0.85% 2.25% 1.06% 0.78% PVI STA: 124+19.99 PVI EL: 799.19 K: 21.52 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 124+04.99
BVCE: 799.06
EVCS: 124+34.99
LP 124+04.99
EVCE: 799.52
799.06 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9 2''G 2''G TRD 5' TRD 28" TRD 24" TRD 48" TRD 48" TRD 27" TRD 27" TRD 60" TRD 12" MB 802 805 799 800 801 803 804 806 807 MATCH LINE = 131+00 - SEE SHT C114 14' SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL JOHN F. KENNEDY PARK JOHN MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 905+00 70' CON. CL 2 1 123+00 124+00 125+00 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00 130+00 131+00 PT: 123+57.83
PI: 129+28.83 SJC CL A CHAINLINK FENCE A CHANNEL WALL A CONC APRON A WALL MATCH LINE = 131+00 - SEE SHT C114
14' 70' 129+36.45 "CON. CL" END AC PATH, MATCH EX CONC APRON 129+76.04 "CON. CL" BEG AC PATH, MATCH EX CONC APRON 129+10.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END CURB, END TRANS. 805.61 TC, 7 6" CF 9 124+50.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT BEG TRANS. 800.45 TC, 6" CF 799.95 FS 124+60.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END CURB, END TRANS. 800.14 FS 0" CF 127+60.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. 803.58 FS 6" CF 127+70.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT END TRANS. 803.47 FS 0" CF 129+00.00 "CON. CL", 6.50' LT BEG TRANS. 805.11 FS 6" CF 7 6" CF 804.08 TC, 805.25 FS 0" CF PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 123+00 - SEE SHT C112 21 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.5.2024 C113 PLAN & PROFILE STA 123+00 TO STA 131+00 FA-2263 AU 798 800 805 810 815 820 825131+00 131+50 132+00 132+50 133+00 133+50 134+00 134+50 135+00 135+50 136+00 136+25 (807.3)
807.03
(807.7)
807.56
(808.2)
808.09
(808.6)
808.62
(809.2)
809.15
(809.7)
809.68
(810.2)
810.16
(810.8)
810.72
(811.3)
811.29
(813.2)
814.57
(817.7)
818.23
GLEN AVE 798 800 805 810 815 820 825 136+62 137+00 137+50 138+00 138+50 139+00 139+50 GB: 133+50.00
EL 809.68
GB: 134+00.00
EL 810.16
PC: 134+90.13
PT: 135+24.43
PI: 136+13.39
(815.5)
816.74
(813.9)
813.79
(814.9)
814.43
(815.4)
814.99
(816.2)
815.82
(816.9)
816.67
GB: 137+80.00
EL 814.21
PC: 136+73.39
PT: 136+83.89
PC: 137+11.47
PT: 137+69.95 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L 136+00 136+50 136+75 PVI STA: 135+98.44 PVI EL: 818.55 K: 3.09 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 135+83.44
BVCE: 817.32
EVCS: 136+13.44
EVCE: 818.32
HP: 136+08.80
818.36 PVI STA: 139+23.72 PVI EL: 816.42 K: 19.25 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 139+08.72
BVCE: 816.04
EVCS: 139+38.72
HP: 139+38.72
EVCE: 816.57
816.57 LVC: 20.00
BVCS: 136+71.12
BVCE: 818.27
EVCS: 136+91.12
EVCE: 817.47

8.20% 1.12% 1.06% 0.94% 2.52% -8.20% 1.45% 1.11% PVI STA: 135+11.32 PVI EL: 811.40 K: 4.24 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 134+96.32
BVCE: 811.23
EVCS: 135+26.32
LP 134+96.32
EVCE: 812.63
811.23PVI STA: 137+38.31 PVI EL: 813.60 K: 3.11 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 137+23.31
BVCE: 814.83
EVCS: 137+53.31
LP 137+48.80
EVCE: 813.82
813.79 PVI STA: 138+80.00 PVI EL: 815.32 K: 21.28 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 138+65.00
BVCE: 815.15
EVCS: 138+95.00
LP 138+65.00
EVCE: 815.70
815.15 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 4 INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1. 6 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 10A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) D REMOVE (AS NOTED) REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 11 RECONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 1319 INSTALL NONWALKABLE SURFACE. 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G
8''G 8''G 8''G 8''G
2''G
2''G
8''SS 8''SS
8''W 8''W
8''W
8''W 8''W
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH WV WV WV WV FH FH WV WV COCO TRD 36" PP PP G14869Y POSTWITNESS POST 2" WM 807 808 809 810 815 815 815 811 812 813 814 814 814 816 816 816 817 817 817 818 818 14' 14'

GLEN AVE SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL SURREY LN LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W R / W R / W 910+00 915+00
14+08 15+00 16+00 17+00
70' 2 1 19 4 3 6 CON. CL 11 WALL A A CHANNEL WALL 13 130+00 131+00 132+00 133+00 134+00 135+00 136+00 137+00 138+00 139+00 AC DIKE D 136+13.30 "CON. CL" END AC PATH "G" SJC CL

R / W R / W
MATCH LINE = 131+00 - SEE SHT C113 136+73.21 "CON. CL" BEG AC PATH LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W A CHAINLINK FENCE 6 3 70'19 2 1 4 7 1' CF D GATE 13 A WALL PI: 136+13.39 PC: 134+90.13 PC: 136+73.39 PC: 137+11.47 PT: 135+24.43 PT: 136+83.89 PT: 137+69.95 A CHANNEL WALL 10 "G" 15+61.79 "CON. CL" 136+43.21 = A WV SEE DETAIL 20 ON SHEET 39 SEE DETAIL 21 ON SHEET 39 ACCESS GATED ACP D A WALL A TREE 14' D ACP D AC DIKE DRIVEWAYA A 8"W PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 139+50 - SEE SHT C115 22 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C114 PLAN & PROFILE STA 131+00 TO STA 139+50 FA-2263 AV 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 139+50 140+00 140+50 141+00 141+50 142+00 142+50 143+00 143+50 144+00 144+50 145+00 145+50 146+00 146+50 147+00 (816.9)
816.67
(817.6)
817.15
(819.0)
818.59
(819.8)
819.35
(820.3)
820.03
(820.7)
820.54
(821.0)
820.86
(821.2)
821.05
(821.1)
820.66
(821.3)
820.70
(822.2)
821.71
(823.1)
822.76
(823.6)
823.27
(823.7)
823.38
(823.7)
823.50 FG @ C/L
GB: 140+20.00
EL 817.35
GB: 145+30.00
EL 822.40
GB: 141+40.00
EL 819.22
GB: 142+90.00
EL 820.84
GB: 141+80.00
EL 819.74
GB: 143+90.00
EL 820.77
GB: 143+20.54
EL 820.90 GB: 146+45.00 EL 823.36
PC: 140+79.71
PCC: 141+87.61
PT: 143+06.76
PC: 143+56.94
PRC: 143+94.45
PT: 144+47.75
PC: 144+86.49
PT: 146+48.81 EG @ C/L PVI STA: 142+20.00 PVI EL: 820.32 K: 42.10 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 142+05.00
BVCE: 820.10
EVCS: 142+35.00
HP: 142+35.00
EVCE: 820.43
820.43 LVC: 20.00
BVCS: 143+56.85
BVCE: 821.09
EVCS: 143+76.85
EVCE: 820.98 PVI STA: 145+75.55 PVI EL: 823.22 K: 31.30 LVC: 50.00 BVCS: 145+50.55
BVCE: 822.77
EVCS: 146+00.55
EVCE: 823.27
HP: 146+00.55
823.27 PVI STA: 146+87.59 PVI EL: 823.55 K: 35.42 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 146+72.59 BVCE: 823.48 EVCS: 147+02.59 EVCE: 823.49 HP: 146+88.55 823.52 0.96% 0.45% 2.30% 1.45% 1.80% 1.56% 0.74% 1.31% 1.45% -1.14% -1.59% 0.20% 0.53% 0.20% PVI STA: 144+26.38 PVI EL: 820.36 K: 11.61 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 144+11.38
BVCE: 820.53
EVCS: 144+41.38
LP 144+24.57
EVCE: 820.58
820.46 LVC: 30.00
BVCS: 144+51.50
BVCE: 820.72
EVCS: 144+81.50
EVCE: 821.29 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 OH OH OH OHOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH PP PP 982354E 820 817 818 819 821 821 821 822 823 824 14' SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL ARROYO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 920+00 925+00 A CHANNEL WALL 70' 2 1 CON. CL 14' SJC CL 140+00 141+00 142+00 143+00 144+00 145+00 146+00 147+00 148+00 PC: 140+79.71 PC: 144+86.49 PC: 147+10.97 PC: 143+56.94 PT: 146+48.81 PT: 143+06.76 PT: 144+47.75 PCC: 141+87.61 PRC: 143+94.45 MATCH LINE = 147+00 - SEE SHT C116 A WALL CHAINLINK FENCEA A WALL 70' 143+20.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' LT BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. 822.05 TC, A UTILITY POLE 9 143+30.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' LT END TRANS. 821.00 FS 0" CF 143+60.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' LT BEG TRANS. 143+70.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' LT END TRANS. 144+90.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' LT END TRANS. 144+80.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' LT BEG TRANS. 145+60.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' LT END TRANS. 145+50.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' LT BEG TRANS. 1' CF 7 7 2' CF 7 1.5' CF 7 1' CF 821.05 FS 1' CF 821.20 FS 1' CF 821.17 FS 821.42 FS 821.59 FS 823.03 FS 822.87 FS 822.17 TC, 2' CF 822.20 TC, 823.42 TC, 2' CF 823.09 TC, 1.5' CF 824.37 TC, 1.5' CF 824.03 TC, 1' CF 144+30.84 "CON. CL" END PCC, BEG AC PATH 144+20.84 "CON. CL" END AC PATH, BEG PCC 3 PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 139+50 - SEE SHT C114 23 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.9.2024 C115 PLAN & PROFILE STA 139+50 TO STA 147+00 FA-2263 AW 810 815 820 825 830 835 840147+00 147+50 148+00 148+50 149+00 149+50 150+00 (823.7)
823.50
(823.7)
823.30
(824.0)
823.62
(824.7)
824.29
(825.4)
825.35
(830.8)
830.51 810 815 820 825 830 835 840 150+00 150+50 151+00 151+50 152+00 152+50 153+00 153+50 154+00 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L

N DUDLEY ST
(827.7)
827.66
(828.6)
828.19
(829.0)
828.62
(829.4)
828.79
(830.0)
829.48
(831.1)
831.08
(832.2)
832.20
GB: 150+56.03
EL 830.24
GB: 151+80.00
EL 828.51
GB: 152+20.00
EL 828.73
PC: 147+10.97
PCC: 148+86.92
PT: 149+39.12
PI: 149+52.58
PI: 150+57.80
PC: 150+83.71
PRC: 151+11.42
PT: 151+30.54
PI: 151+79.05
PC: 152+62.73
PT: 152+90.91 LVC: 20.00
BVCS: 149+30.25
BVCE: 829.19
EVCS: 149+50.25
EVCE: 830.51 LVC: 20.00
BVCS: 153+66.87
BVCE: 831.69
EVCS: 153+86.87
EVCE: 832.12 LVC: 10.00 BVCS: 150+63.31 BVCE: 830.37 EVCS: 150+73.31 EVCE: 829.79 14.80% -0.40% 1.34% 2.71% 0.55% 0.20% 1.07% -13.25% 3.63% PVI STA: 147+70.19 PVI EL: 823.22 K: 23.06 LVC: 40.00 BVCS: 147+50.19
BVCE: 823.30
EVCS: 147+90.19
LP 147+59.32
EVCE: 823.49
823.28 PVI STA: 149+01.84 PVI EL: 824.99 K: 2.23 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 148+86.84
BVCE: 824.78
EVCS: 149+16.84
LP 148+86.84
EVCE: 827.21
824.78 LVC: 20.00
BVCS: 150+80.20
BVCE: 828.88
EVCS: 151+00.20
EVCE: 827.66 PVI STA: 153+23.44 PVI EL: 830.11 K: 32.70 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 153+08.44
BVCE: 829.71
EVCS: 153+38.44
EVCE: 830.66LVC: 20.00
BVCS: 152+66.66
BVCE: 828.82
EVCS: 152+86.66
EVCE: 829.12 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 4 INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1. 6 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 10A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) C ADJUST TO GRADE (AS NOTED) D REMOVE (AS NOTED) REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 11 RECONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 1319 INSTALL NONWALKABLE SURFACE. 22 INSTALL PIPE GATE OR SIMILAR PER SPPWC STD PLAN 602-4. REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9 GV GV WV WV WV WV LP SL PP PP 982351E S SMH LID WM VV WM PP PP 4455882E SIGN SIGN GA PP PP 4173964E PP PP 720089E S SMH LID WV WV WV WV WV WV FH FH PP PP 2270710E WM PP PP 2270711E 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W
8''SS
8''SS OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 3''G 3''G 3''G 3''G 3"G IN 6" CSG 825830 824 826 827 828 829 830 830 828 828 829 829 831 832 925+00 930+00 10+8811+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 12' N DUDLEY ST SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W R / W R / W 3 6 2 1 CON. CL 19 4 10 1' CF 7 147+00 148+00 149+00 PI: 149+52.58 PC: 147+10.97 PT: 146+48.81 PT: 149+39.12 PCC: 148+86.92 SJC CL "D" 11 13 A CHANNEL WALL A CHAINLINK FENCE 151+00 152+00 153+00 154+00 149+50.29 "CON. CL" END AC PATH UTILITY POLEA FENCE (9 LF)D 7 C GV ACCESS GATED R / WR / W 13' LACFCD R / W 10 19 UTILITY POLEA A UTILITY POLE A UTILITY POLE D FENCE (8.5 LF) D FENCE (8 LF) 1311 A UTILITY POLE WM C 7 4 CHANNEL WALLA DRAINAGE INLETA 150+60.29 "CON. CL" BEG AC PATH CON. CL 7 7 MATCH LINE = 147+00 - SEE SHT C115 70' 2 1 CHAINLINK FENCEA "CON. CL" 149+90.43 = "D" 13+04.70 "CON. CL" 150+20.03 = "D" 12+28.71 C WM 4 C POST SEE DETAIL 25 ON SHEET 41 14' WV C AC DIKE D ACP D 24"W A SEE DETAIL 22 ON SHEET 40 SEE DETAIL 23 ON SHEET 40 SEE DETAIL 24 ON SHEET 41 3"G A A 8"W MAILBOX C 12' D ACP 7 6"CF 7 8"CF D AC DIKE PI: 150+51.63 PI: 150+57.80 PI: 151+79.05 PC: 154+40.20 PC: 150+83.71 PC: 152+62.73 PT: 154+68.38 PT: 152+90.91 PT: 151+30.54 PRC: 151+11.42 A GUY WIRE LACFCD R / W SIGN D D ACCESS GATE 22D AC DIKE 147+65.19 "CON. CL" END AC PATH, BEG PCC 147+75.19 "CON. CL" END PCC, BEG AC PATH 3 9 9 PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 154+00 - SEE SHT C117 24 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C116 PLAN & PROFILE STA 147+00 TO STA 154+00 FA-2263 AX 820 825 830 835 840 845 850 820 825 830 835 840 845 850 154+00 154+50 155+00 155+50 156+00 156+50 157+00 157+50 158+00 158+50 159+00 159+50 160+00 (832.2)
832.20
(832.7)
832.51
(833.1)
832.84
(833.3)
833.02
(833.3)
833.10
(833.6)
833.28
(834.0)
833.61
(834.3)
833.94
(834.6)
834.27
(834.8)
834.64
(835.3)
835.02
(835.6)
835.40
(836.0)
835.78 FG @ C/L EG @ C/L
GB: 156+30.00
EL 833.15
GB: 158+10.00
EL 834.34
GB: 154+40.00
EL 832.44
GB: 155+20.00
EL 832.97
PC: 154+40.20
PT: 154+68.38
PI: 156+70.38
PI: 157+20.38 0.16% 0.66% 0.76% 0.62% 0.66% CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9 OH OH OH OH

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH GA PP PP 982152E PP PP 720984E PP GA PP 720986E 835 833 834 836 935+00 154+00 155+00 156+00 157+00 158+00 159+00 160+00 PI: 156+70.38 PI: 157+20.38 PC: 154+40.20 PT: 154+68.38 13'
13' SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL TYLEEN PL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 65'
70' 2 1 CON. CL CHAINLINK FENCEA A UTILITY POLE
MATCH LINE = 160+00 - SEE SHT C118SJC CL 9 CHAINLINK FENCEA A BUILDINGUTILITY POLEA CHANNEL WALLA UTILITY POLE A PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 154+00 - SEE SHT C116 25 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C117 PLAN & PROFILE STA 154+00 TO STA 160+00 FA-2263 AY 830 835 840 845 850 855 860160+00 160+50 161+00 161+50 162+00 162+50 163+00 (836.0)
835.78
(836.1)
836.16
(836.6)
836.63
(837.3)
837.13
(837.7)
837.50
(838.6)
838.72
WEBER ST 830 835 840 845 850 855 860 163+37 163+50 164+00 164+50 165+00 165+50 166+00 166+50 167+00 167+50 168+00 GB: 160+80.00
EL 836.39
GB: 161+30.00
EL 836.98
GB: 162+89.39
EL 841.27
841.13
839.51
839.93
840.29
840.76
841.22
841.69
842.16
842.63
843.10 163+00 163+50
(841.2)
(839.8)
(840.4)
(840.5)
(840.9)
(841.6)
(841.9)
(842.3)
(842.7)
(843.3)
GB: 164+50.00
EL 839.93
GB: 165+00.00
GB: 163+46.42
EL 840.29
EL 841.30 FG @ C/L
PC: 161+82.21
PRC: 162+58.28
PT: 162+89.58
PC: 163+62.82
Mid: 164+21.94
PT: 164+81.06 EG @ C/L 0.76% 1.17% 7.07% 0.74% 2.69% -4.52% 0.88% 0.70% 0.94% PVI STA: 162+52.91 PVI EL: 838.69 K: 6.86 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 162+37.91
BVCE: 838.29
EVCS: 162+67.91
LP 162+37.91
EVCE: 839.75
838.29 PVI STA: 162+11.79 PVI EL: 837.58 K: 15.36 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 161+96.79
BVCE: 837.47
EVCS: 162+26.79
LP 161+96.79
EVCE: 837.99
837.47 PVI STA: 163+88.48 PVI EL: 839.40 K: 5.56 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 163+73.48
BVCE: 840.07
EVCS: 164+03.48
LP 163+98.60
EVCE: 839.53
839.51 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 4 INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1. 6 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 10A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 11 RECONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 1319 INSTALL NONWALKABLE SURFACE. D REMOVE (AS NOTED) 2''G 2''G
2''G 2''G
6''W
6''W 6''W
6''W 6''W OH OH OH

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH GA PP PP 395671E PP PP 1395671E S SMH LID PP PP G23588Y GA WM PP PP 1476700E PP PP 4892520E GA GA PP PP 982152E 840 836 837 838 839 841 840 840 841 841 842 843 940+00 945+00 10+00 11+00
12+00 12+18
13'
14' SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W
R / W

R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W
70'
65'
70' 2 1 CON. CL 3 6 4 10 10 4 3 19 19 2 1 6 1' CF 7 160+00 161+00 162+00 164+00 165+00 166+00 167+00 168+00 PI: 163+36.15 PI: 163+00.54 PC: 161+82.21 PC: 163+62.82 PT: 164+81.06 PT: 162+89.58 PRC: 162+58.28 13 162+89.04 "CON. CL" END AC PATH 163+46.06 "CON. CL" BEG AC PATH WEBER ST "W" SJC CL A CHAINLINK FENCE CHAINLINK FENCEA CHANNEL WALLA R / W
MATCH LINE = 160+00 - SEE SHT C117
MATCH LINE = 168+00 - SEE SHT C119 "CON. CL" 163+17.97 = "W" 11+45.02 SEE DETAIL 26 ON SHEET 42 SEE DETAIL 27 ON SHEET 42 D ACCESS GATE ACCESS GATE D AC DIKE D ACP D A 2"G A 6"W D ACP D AC DIKE CHANNEL WALLA MONUMENT POLE A 11 A DRIVEWAY PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 26 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C118 PLAN & PROFILE STA 160+00 TO STA 168+00 FA-2263 AZ 835 840 845 850 855 860 865 835 840 845 850 855 860 865 168+00 168+50 169+00 169+50 170+00 170+50 171+00 171+50 172+00 172+50 173+00 173+50 174+00 174+50 175+00 175+50 176+00 176+50 177+00 (843.3)
843.10
(843.7)
843.57
(844.3)
844.11
(845.0)
844.87
(845.8)
845.57
(846.3)
846.01
(846.7)
846.37
(847.1)
846.78
(847.4)
847.21
(847.9)
847.65
(848.2)
848.11
(848.7)
848.60
(849.2)
849.09
(849.8)
849.58
(850.4)
850.03
(851.1)
850.49
(851.7)
850.94
(852.0)
851.40
(852.3)
851.85 FG @ C/L
GB: 168+50.00
EL 843.57
GB: 170+20.00
EL 845.79
GB: 171+20.00
EL 846.51
GB: 172+80.00
EL 847.91
GB: 174+50.00
EL 849.58 PC: 174+60.56
PT: 176+84.07EG @ C/L PVI STA: 169+70.00 PVI EL: 845.24 K: 40.31 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 169+55.00
BVCE: 844.96
EVCS: 169+85.00
EVCE: 845.40
HP: 169+85.00
845.40 1.84% 1.10% 1.07% 0.87% 0.98% 0.73% 0.94% 0.91% PVI STA: 169+20.00 PVI EL: 844.32 K: 38.77 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 169+05.00
BVCE: 844.16
EVCS: 169+35.00
LP 169+05.00
EVCE: 844.60
844.16 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE PER SPPWC STD PLAN 600-4. 9 W W W 845 847 850 851 845 843 844 846 847 848 849 852 14'
14' SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 950+00 955+00 CHAINLINK FENCEA CHANNEL WALLA 70'
70' 2 1 CON. CL SJC CL 168+00 169+00 170+00 171+00 172+00 173+00 174+00 175+00 176+00 177+00 178+00 PC: 174+60.56
PT: 176+84.07
MATCH LINE = 168+00 - SEE SHT C118
MATCH LINE = 177+00 - SEE SHT C120 174+20.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' RT BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. 849.39 FS 0" CF 1.5' CF 7 9 174+30.00 "CON. CL", 7.00' RT END TRANS. 850.99 TC, 1.5' CF 849.49 FS PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 27 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C119 PLAN & PROFILE STA 168+00 TO STA 177+00 FA-2263 BA 845 850 855 860 865 870 875 845 850 855 860 865 870 875 177+00 177+50 178+00 178+50 179+00 179+50 180+00 180+50 181+00 181+50 182+00 182+50 183+00 183+50 184+00 184+50 185+00 185+50 185+90 (852.3)
851.85
(852.7)
852.31
(853.0)
852.76
(853.5)
853.22
(853.9)
853.67
(854.1)
853.95
(853.9)
853.78
(853.7)
853.49
(853.8)
853.45
(854.4)
853.88
(855.1)
854.61
(855.7)
855.32
(856.7)
856.55
(857.7)
857.51
(858.4)
858.32
(859.0)
859.02
(862.6)
862.32 FG @ C/L

MURCHISON AVE

CLEVELAND ST (CUL-DE-SAC)
GB: 181+70.00
EL 854.12
GB: 179+80.00
EL 853.89
GB: 184+00.00
EL 858.32
GB: 182+20.00
EL 854.94
PC: 183+98.46
PRC: 184+87.93 EG @ C/L PVI STA: 185+29.33 PVI EL: 864.52 K: 3.24 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 185+14.33
BVCE: 863.39
EVCS: 185+44.33
EVCE: 864.26
HP: 185+38.66
864.31 PVI STA: 183+10.00 PVI EL: 856.86 K: 21.62 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 182+95.00
BVCE: 856.41
EVCS: 183+25.00
EVCE: 857.10
HP: 183+25.00
857.10PVI STA: 179+34.65 PVI EL: 853.98 K: 26.79 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 179+19.65
BVCE: 853.85
EVCS: 179+49.65
HP: 179+44.01
EVCE: 853.95
853.96 3.01% 0.64% -0.21% -0.57% 1.20% 7.50% 1.63% 1.21% 1.64% 1.27% 0.91% PVI STA: 184+55.70 PVI EL: 859.00 K: 4.77 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 184+40.70
BVCE: 858.82
EVCS: 184+70.70
LP 184+40.70
EVCE: 860.12
858.82 PVI STA: 182+65.40 PVI EL: 855.52 K: 17.19 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 182+50.40
BVCE: 855.33
EVCS: 182+80.40
LP 182+50.40
EVCE: 855.97
855.33 PVI STA: 181+30.00 PVI EL: 853.64 K: 53.89 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 181+15.00
BVCE: 853.54
EVCS: 181+45.00
LP 181+15.00
EVCE: 853.82
853.54 PVI STA: 180+80.00 PVI EL: 853.32 K: 24.74 LVC: 30.00 BVCS: 180+65.00
BVCE: 853.40
EVCS: 180+95.00
LP 180+79.10
EVCE: 853.42
853.36 CONSTRUCTION NOTES DISPOSITION NOTES CONSTRUCT 4" ACP, 2" CLASS C2-PG-64-10 OVER 2" CLASS B2-PG-64-10, OVER 6" CMB, SUBGRADE COMPACTION MIN. 90% 1 REMOVE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE, SAWCUT EXISTING 4' POST AT BASE, CORE DRILL 6' HIGH POST ADJACENT TO EXISTING POST AND INSTALL WELDED WIRE MESH FENCE ON NEW POSTS. 2 CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK OVER NATIVE PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-7-02. 3 REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT MODIFIED DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-27-10, TYPE II. SEE SHEETS 29-44 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 4 INSTALL SERVICE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE PER SHEET 55, DETAIL 1. 6 CONSTRUCT VARIABLE HEIGHT PCC CURB PER CITY OF POMONA STD. No. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN. 7 CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT OVER BASE FOR SAWCUT PATCH AS REQUIRED TO JOIN EXISTING AC PAVEMENT PER SPPWC STD PLAN 133-4. 10A PROTECT IN PLACE (AS NOTED) D REMOVE (AS NOTED) REMOVE AND RECONSTRUCT 6"-8" VARIABLE HEIGHT TYPE "B" PCC CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF POMONA STD. NO. A-3-64, HEIGHT PER PLAN 1114 INSTALL PLANTING AND TRAIL AMENITIES PER SHEETS 66-72. INSTALL WATER SERVICE AND WATER METER FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES PER SHEETS 60-65. 15 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''SS 8''SS W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 2''G 2''G OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH PP PP G18370Y S SMH LID WV WV FH FH S SMH LID LP SL PP PP 2129349E WM WM PP PP 1417847E GA PP GUY POLE 1525775E 855 860 852 853 854 854 854 856 857 858 859 861862863864 955+00 960+00 963+80 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 48+90 14' MURCHISON AVE SAN BERNARDINO FWY SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL CLEVELAND ST CLEVELAND ST LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W R / W R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 70'
90' 3 3 2 1 CON. CL 6 4 10 45' 177+00 178+00 179+00 180+00 181+00 182+00 183+00 184+00 185+00 PC: 183+98.46 PT: 176+84.07 PT: 185+49.83 PRC: 184+87.93 "M" 185+49.27 "CON. CL" END AC PATH CHAINLINK FENCEA CHANNEL WALLA 11 3 MATCH LINE = 177+00 - SEE SHT C119 LACFCD R / W SJC CL "M" 47+56.74 "CON. CL" 185+77.27 = 14 15 SEE DETAIL 29 ON SHEET 44 SEE DETAIL 28 ON SHEET 43 7 1.5' CF A CATCH BASIN 180+75.00 "CON. CL" END AC PATH, BEG PCC 180+85.00 "CON. CL" END PCC, BEG AC PATH ACCESS GATE D UTILITY POLE A 3 A UTILITY POLE D AC DIKED ACP 14' A WM A CHAINLINK FENCE D CHAINLINK FENCE 2" G A UTILITY (WATER)A 177+50.00 "CON. CL" END CURB, END TRANS. 177+40.00 "CON. CL" BEG TRANS. 853.82 TC, 1.5' CF852.41 FS 0" CF852.32 FS PROFILE PLAN GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. FOR PATH ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTING STREETS ALIGNMENTS LINE AND CURVE DATA SEE SHEETS 6 - 7. 2. FOR PROPOSED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, SEE SHEETS 73-90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3. ALL EXISTING FENCES, GATES, POSTS, CURBS, AC BERM, AC PAVEMENT, PCC PAVEMENT, DG PATHWAYS, ETC THAT ARE WITHIN THE TRAILS RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE REMOVED FOR COMPLETION OF WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS PROTECT IN PLACE. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS FOR PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DETAILS ON SHEETS 29 - 44. 5. FENCE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. EXACT MEASUREMENTS FOR FENCE REPLACEMENTS WHERE FENCING HAS BEEN DAMAGED, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. CONTRACTOR TO TREE TRIM ALONG THE CORRIDOR FOR ANY TREE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PATH PER DETAIL 7 ON SHEET 56. 4' 0 4' 8' VERT: 1" = 4' 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 28 PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C120 PLAN & PROFILE STA 177+00 TO END FA-2263 BB 6''G
6''G
6''G
6''G
6''G
6''G
6''G 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W RW RW RW RW RW RW
RW
RW
RW
RW
RW TS TSNO SIGNSN SIGNSN TRD 6"
TRD 8" TRD 24" LACFCD R / W 10+00 11+00 CON. CL CON. CL R/W 4.5% 4.5% 1.5% 1.5% (4.6%) 4.3% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 4.0% 2.9% 4.1% 0.7% 5.1% 1.7% 3.5' 4' 16' 1.5' 2' 4.6' 10.5' 8.9'4' 4' 7' 2' 1.6' 6.1' 9.5% 4.0% 15.6' 15' 5' 13'

BIKEPATH

4.5'
SIDE
WALK
R93.5'
R226.5'
R106.5'
R213.5'2.7% CPP R / W 1.5% "CON. CL" STA 11+54.95 6.50' LT, END CURB, SW 704.31 FS (706.76 TC), "T" STA 188+00.23 43.28' LT, JOIN EX (706.38 LIP) "T" STA 188+00.08 41.29' LT, JOIN EX (706.48 FS) "T" STA 188+39.56 44.71' LT, BEG C&G, JOIN EX (706.84 FL) "T" STA 188+39.31 42.98' LT, JOIN EX (706.83 FS) (707.37 TC), "T" STA 188+24.76 43.00' LT 706.75 LIP "T" STA 188+39.01 40.98' LT, JOIN EX (706.87 FS) "T" STA 188+09.17 52.00' LT 706.72 BW "T" STA 188+05.25 44.50' LT, END DWY 706.38 FL 706.90 TC "T" STA 188+24.79 52.00' LT 706.96 BW "T" STA 188+35.03 51.96' LT 707.38 BW "T" STA 188+00.52 51.93' LT, END SW, JOIN EX (707.08 BW) "T" STA 188+40.36 49.26' LT, BEG SW, JOIN EX (707.56 BW) "T" STA 188+24.76 44.50' LT 706.74 FL, 0" CF "T" STA 188+09.15 41.00' LT, JOIN EX (706.64 FS) "T" STA 188+24.76 41.00' LT, JOIN EX (706.78 FS) "T" STA 188+24.76 48.00' LT 706.90 FS "CON. CL" STA 11+39.95 11.00' LT 704.19 FS 705.19 TC "T" STA 188+00.36 44.88' LT, END C&G, JOIN EX (706.23 FL) "CON. CL" STA 11+14.05 6.50' LT, BEG CURB, SW 703.89 FS 704.89 TC 705.31 TC "CON. CL" STA 11+34.72 12.51' LT, BEG FENCE "CON. CL" STA 10+24.36 BEG AC PATH "CON. CL" STA 10+25.04 6.50' RT, BEG CURB 706.69 FS 707.19 TC "CON. CL" STA 10+24.89 23.88' RT, BEG FENCE "CON. CL" STA 11+29.46 11.00' LT 704.06 FS 705.06 TC "CON. CL" STA 11+03.70 6.50' RT, END CURB 703.81 FS 704.31 TC "CON. CL" STA 10+66.93 6.50' RT 705.50 FS 706.00 TC "T" STA 188+09.17 48.00' LT 706.66 FS "T" STA 188+09.15 44.50' LT 706.50 FL, 0" CF "T" STA 188+09.15 43.00' LT 706.54 LIP "T" STA 188+28.66 44.50' LT, BEG DWY 706.77 FL 706.92 TC "CON. CL" STA 11+55.73 7.83' LT, END FENCE, JOIN EX 705 706 707 704 704 706 705 707 704 704 707 1.5% 1.5% 3:1
MAX

1.5% 13' BIKEPATH 4.5'

1.5' "CON. CL" STA 11+40.17 12.50' LT

1.5%

LACFCD R / W
10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W POSTGDP 6" POSTGDP 6" 14+00 R33.5' R46.5' R46.5' R33.5' R46.5' R33.5' R33.5' R46.5'

0.5%
13' 5.2'

1.6' LACFCD R / W CPP R / W "CON. CL" STA 13+67.73 6.50' RT 705.86 FS "CON. CL" STA 14+16.42 6.50' RT 706.08 FS "CON. CL" STA 13+67.73 6.50' LT 705.93 FS "CON. CL" STA 13+53.32 6.50' RT 705.78 FS "CON. CL" STA 14+02.01 6.50' RT 706.07 FS "CON. CL" STA 13+88.03 6.50' RT 705.98 FS "CON. CL" STA 13+81.60 6.50' RT 705.95 FS "CON. CL" STA 14+02.01 6.50' LT 706.13 FS "CON. CL" STA 14+16.42 6.50' LT, END FENCE, JOIN EX. 706.35 FS "CON. CL" STA 13+87.98 6.50' LT 706.05 FS "CON. CL" STA 13+53.32 6.50' LT, BEG. FENCE, JOIN EX. 705.84 FS "CON. CL" STA 13+81.76 6.50' LT 706.01 FS 706 706 13'
BIKEPATH 1.8'

1.5' EX. BOLLARD EX. BOLLARD CON. CL
13'
BIKEPATH 0.5% 0.5% "CON. CL" STA 13+69.22 10.17' LT, END FENCE, JOIN EX. "CON. CL" STA 14+00.68 10.11' LT, BEG FENCE, JOIN EX. Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 ENTRANCE TO BIKE PATH FROM TEMPLE AVE 1 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 29 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.5.2024 C200 FA-2263 BC BIKE PATH NEAR UTILITY NEAR STA 13+85 2 SCALE: 1" = 5' 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W
TRD 30"
TRD 30"
SIGN
SN
ICV

ICV TS TSL TS TSNO
11+00
KELLOGG DR CAMPUS DR 24+00 25+00
7'

4.9'

16.9'

9.2'

7.7'

14.1' CON. CL "K"
2' 3'
5' 5' 5' 2.6'
5' 5.5' 5' 6' 6'

6.5'

5.2' 4' 16'

9.5'

5.5' 4' 3' 4'
2'

1.5'

3.7' 15.5' 10' 6.5' 16.5' 5.5'
12'

3.9'
11' 8' (714.11 FL) "CON. CL" STA 23+92.54 19.80' LT, JOIN EX (714.24 LIP) "CON. CL" STA 23+92.54 21.80' LT, JOIN EX (714.32 FS) "CON. CL" STA 24+42.34 3.75' RT (714.94 BW) (716.70 FL) "K" STA 11+13.96, EC 35.36' RT, END C&G, JOIN EX (717.38 TC) "K" STA 11+13.96 18.86' RT, JOIN EX (717.05 FS) "CON. CL" STA 24+75.20 2.75' LT 715.32 TC 714.82 FL "CON. CL" STA 24+92.20 2.75' LT 715.43 TC 714.93 FL "CON. CL" STA 24+81.20 2.75' LT 714.87 FL, 0" CF "CON. CL" STA 24+86.20 2.75' LT 714.90 FL, 0" CF "CON. CL" STA 24+81.20 7.75' RT 715.37 FS "CON. CL" STA 24+86.20 7.75' RT 715.40 FS "CON. CL" STA 24+81.20 2.75' RT 715.29 FS "CON. CL" STA 24+86.20 2.75' RT 715.32 FS "CON. CL" STA 24+00.54 12.80' LT 714.35 FS "CON. CL" STA 24+00.54 8.80' LT 714.37 FS "CON. CL" STA 23+92.54 8.80' LT 714.14 FS "CON. CL" STA 24+94.04, BCR 2.75' LT 715.45 TC 714.95 FL "K" STA 10+66.96, ECR 24.36' RT 715.87 TC 715.68 FL "K" STA 10+62.13 24.95' RT 715.50 FL, 0" CF "K" STA 10+57.12 26.94' RT 715.41 FL, 0" CF "K" STA 10+57.10 32.52' RT 715.80 FS "K" STA 11+04.96 40.36' RT (717.51 FS), 0" CF "K" STA 10+82.67, BC 24.36' RT 716.65 TC 716.15 FL "K" STA 10+70.63 24.36' RT 716.14 TC 715.81 FL "K" STA 10+98.31, PRC 29.86' RT 717.21 TC 716.54 FL "K" STA 10+57.15 18.86' RT (715.43 FS) "K" STA 10+71.16 47.87' RT 716.16 FS 716.58 TC "K" STA 10+78.74 39.86' RT 716.64 FS 716.91 TC "K" STA 10+82.67 39.86' RT 716.77 FS 717.00 TC "K" STA 10+98.31 39.86' RT 717.29 FS 717.39 TC "K" STA 10+62.15 18.86' RT (715.69 FS) "K" STA 10+43.46 18.86' RT (715.18 FS) "K" STA 10+48.46 18.86' RT (715.01 FS) "K" STA 10+45.46 18.86' RT (715.12 FS) "CON. CL" STA 24+00.54 18.30' LT 714.32 TC 714.24 FL "CON. CL" STA 24+16.54 18.30' LT 714.44 TC 714.36 FL "CON. CL" STA 24+16.54 19.80' LT 714.42 LIP "CON. CL" STA 24+00.54 19.80' LT 714.30 LIP "K" STA 10+62.09 37.54' RT 715.96 FS "K" STA 10+57.09 37.52' RT 715.87 FS "K" STA 10+51.73 31.40' RT 715.76 TC 715.26 FL "CON. CL" STA 24+20.54 18.29' LT, END. DWY 714.70 TC 714.37 FL "CON. CL" STA 23+97.54 18.30' LT, BEG DWY 714.66 TC, 714.16 FL "CON. CL" STA 24+16.54 21.80' LT (714.52 FS) "CON. CL" STA 24+00.54 21.80' LT (714.40 FS) "CON. CL" STA 24+37.34 2.75' LT 714.72 TC 714.39 FL "CON. CL" STA 24+42.34 2.75' LT 714.91 TC 714.41 FL "CON. CL" STA 24+32.96 1.66' RT (714.75 BW) "CON. CL" STA 24+28.31 5.76' LT 714.49 FS"CON. CL" STA 24+29.15 1.84' LT 714.55 FS "CON. CL" STA 24+66.66 3.75' RT 715.37 BW, 0" CF "CON. CL" STA 24+81.20 4.25' LT 714.92 LIP "CON. CL" STA 24+86.20 4.25' LT 714.95 LIP "CON. CL" STA 24+66.66 2.75' LT 715.27 TC 714.77 FL "K" STA 10+62.10 32.54' RT 715.89 FS "K" STA 10+62.12 27.54' RT 715.51 FS "K" STA 11+04.96 33.68' RT 717.39 TC 716.67 FL "CON. CL" STA 24+81.20 6.25' LT (714.97 FS) "CON. CL" STA 24+86.20 6.25' LT (715.00 FS) "CON. CL" STA 24+32.23 6.59' LT 714.47 FS "CON. CL" STA 24+78.04 11.86' RT 715.45 FS 718.88 TC "CON. CL" STA 24+69.58 22.44' RT, END FENCE "CON. CL" STA 23+72.62 8.50' LT, END CURB, BEG SW 714.07 FS 0" CF "CON. CL" STA 23+92.54 18.30' LT, BEG C&G, JOIN EX (714.59 TC), "CON. CL" STA 23+92.54 13.00' LT, END SW 714.34 FS "CON. CL" STA 23+82.27 14.50' LT, END FENCE "CON. CL" STA 24+20.54 3.50' RT, END AC PATH 714.37 FS "K" STA 11+13.75 41.86' RT, END SW, JOIN EX (717.40 FS) CON. CL SJC CL LACFCD R / W CPP R / W

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%
12'

BIKEPATH

12.3'

4.5'
SIDE
WALK

3.5'

8.5'

8.8'

3.5' 3'

0.5%

0.5%

1.6%

1.6%

1.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%

3.6%

3.6%

2.5%

2.5% 7.5% 8.8%

0.5%

0.5% 1.4% 1.4%

1.8% 7.6% 7.6% 0.4%

1.8%

7.5%

5.0%

1.7%

0.5%

1.5%

4.7% 0.8% 0.8% 1.9% (0.3%)
(1.2%)

1.5% 3.2% 0.3% 0.8%

5.0%

4.0%

5.0% 0.8% 0.8% 11.3% 6.5%

4.0% 0.2%

7.6%

7.6%

0.5% "CON. CL" STA 23+76.48 14.50' LT "CON. CL" STA 23+72.00 10.00' LT 12'

BIKEPATH
2:1
MAX

1.5'

1.5' 3:1 MAX
714
714
713
714 713 714
715
716
716
717 715
717 5.2' 10.3' 23+00 "CON. CL" STA 23+29.91 8.50' LT 712.86 FS 713.36 TC "CON. CL" STA 23+09.98 6.50' LT 712.53 FS 713.03 TC "CON. CL" STA 23+10.02 6.50' RT 712.30 FS "CON. CL" STA 23+30.04 3.50' RT 712.66 FS "CON. CL" STA 23+09.91 8.00' LT, BEG FENCE, JOIN EX LACFCD R / W CPP R / W 20' TRANSITION 12'

BIKEPATH

8.5' 3.5'
13'

BIKEPATH

6.5' 6.5'

1.5% "CON. CL" STA 23+29.84 10.00' LT

1.5'
2:1
MAX

3.4'

1.5%

1.5'
713 713 Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 KELLOGG DRIVE AND CAMPUS DRIVE SW CORNER 3 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
5 0 5 10 30 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C201 FA-2263 BD

MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE LEFT

MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW RIGHT
WV
WV
TS
TSL
TS
TSNO
S
ICV

SMH LID
SIGN
SN
TRD 30" SD CBMH LID 805+00
11+00
KELLOGG DR CAMPUS DR 26+00 27+00

0.9%

2.5%

0.5%

2.0%

1.5%

0.5%

1.1%
(1.8%)

5.0% 2.0%

4.8%11.3% 14.3%

7.9%

7.7%

1.8%

1.8% 0.4% 0.4% 1.6% 6.3% 1.6% 0.4% 6.2%

1.7%

1.8%

1.8%

1.8%

7.0%

8.4% 9.0%

9.7%

1.9%

1.6% 1.8% (2.4%)

3.0% 3.6%

1.5% 2.1% 1.3% 2.7%

2.0%

4.8%

5.0%

4.5%
2' 1.7'

3.5' 16'
4'

6.2'

6.7'3' 3' 15'
5'
7' 5' 7' 2.5'
5' 5'

6.5' 2.2'

4.4'
11' 8'
2' 3'

10.8' 5'

6.5'
6'

6.9'

6.6'

5.4'

4.6' "K" 0.4% 0.9% CON. CL 5' 1.7% (716.05 FL) "CON. CL" STA 26+74.59 18.29' LT, END C&G, JOIN EX (716.57 TC) "CON. CL" STA 26+74.59 19.99' LT, JOIN EX (716.24 LIP) "CON. CL" STA 26+74.59 21.99' LT, JOIN EX (716.27 FS) "K" STA 10+90.00 35.64' LT, END C&G, JOIN EX (717.06 TC) (716.40 FL) "K" STA 10+90.00 27.64' LT, JOIN EX (716.51 FS) "CON. CL" STA 26+66.59 21.99' LT (716.19 FS) "CON. CL" STA 26+50.59 22.73' LT (716.07 FS) "CON. CL" STA 26+66.59 18.29' LT 716.10 TC 716.02 FL "CON. CL" STA 26+29.95 10.73' LT 716.00 TC 715.92 FL "CON. CL" STA 26+69.59 18.29' LT, END DWY 716.53 TC 715.84 FL 716.03 FL "CON. CL" STA 26+50.59 20.71' LT 716.03 LIP "CON. CL" STA 26+66.59 19.99' LT 716.09 LIP "CON. CL" STA 26+30.32 16.96' LT 716.09 LIP "CON. CL" STA 26+66.59 8.79' LT 716.32 FS "CON. CL" STA 26+69.59 8.79' LT 716.38 FS "CON. CL" STA 26+37.94 4.78' LT 716.12 FS "CON. CL" STA 26+33.13 0.10' LT (716.44 BW) "CON. CL" STA 26+23.54 3.75' RT 716.30 FS "CON. CL" STA 26+08.54 3.75' RT 716.25 BW "CON. CL" STA 26+74.59 12.09' LT, JOIN EX (716.68 BW) "K" STA 10+62.00 60.97' LT (716.23 BW) "K" STA 10+67.33 55.24' LT (716.33 BW) "K" STA 10+71.61 50.65' LT (716.58 BW) "K" STA 10+71.59 48.44' LT (716.57 BW) "K" STA 10+58.96 58.14' LT 716.15 FS "K" STA 10+53.96 58.14' LT 716.06 FS "K" STA 10+58.96 53.14' LT 716.17 FS "K" STA 10+57.40 50.66' LT 716.13 FS "K" STA 10+62.40 50.65' LT 716.22 FS "K" STA 10+53.96 53.14' LT 716.08 FS "K" STA 10+57.38 45.66' LT 716.05 FS "K" STA 10+62.38 45.65' LT 716.14 FS "K" STA 10+79.00 40.64' LT (716.92 BW) "K" STA 10+90.00 40.64' LT, END SW, JOIN EX (717.18 BW) "K" STA 10+79.00 35.64' LT 716.83 TC 716.16 FL "K" STA 10+71.35 35.64' LT 716.45 TC 715.95 FL BCR, "K" STA 10+66.96 35.64' LT 716.08 TC 715.82 FL "K" STA 10+62.35 36.18' LT 715.69 FL, 0" CF "K" STA 10+57.36 38.09' LT 715.60 FL, 0" CF "K" STA 10+62.36 38.65' LT 715.70 FS "K" STA 10+52.00 42.36' LT 716.08 TC 715.58 FL "K" STA 10+48.50 47.95' LT 716.06 TC 715.56 FL "K" STA 10+47.11 53.14' LT 715.54 FL, 0" CF "K" STA 10+46.96 58.14' LT 715.52 FL, 0" CF "K" STA 10+44.63 58.14' LT 715.60 LIP "K" STA 10+45.12 53.14' LT 715.58 LIP "K" STA 10+45.46 49.64' LT 715.56 LIP "K" STA 10+43.11 53.14' LT (715.61 FS) "K" STA 10+42.62 58.14' LT (715.66 FS) "K" STA 10+46.96 63.14' LT 715.97 TC 715.47 FL "K" STA 10+46.96 92.14' LT 716.37 TC 715.70 FL "K" STA 10+46.96, ECR 55.64' LT 715.53 FL, 0" CF 715.98 LIP "CON. CL" STA 26+08.54 2.75' LT (716.15 TC) (715.34 FL) 715.82 LIP "K" STA 10+43.46 27.64' LT (715.49 FS)"K" STA 10+45.46 27.64' LT (715.45 FS) "K" STA 10+48.46 27.64' LT (715.30 FS) "K" STA 10+62.32 27.64' LT (715.58 FS) "K" STA 10+57.32 27.64' LT (715.32 FS) "CON. CL" STA 26+23.54 2.75' LT (716.27 TC) (715.42 FL) 715.93 LIP "CON. CL" STA 26+47.59 18.29' LT, BEG DWY 716.34 TC "CON. CL" STA 26+38.92 7.61' LT 716.07 FS "CON. CL" STA 26+35.15 8.93' LT 716.05 FS "CON. CL" STA 26+66.59 12.79' LT 716.24 FS "CON. CL" STA 26+78.76 13.29' LT, BEG FENCE "CON. CL" STA 26+92.66 17.79' LT, END SW, JOIN EX (716.75 FS) BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. "CON. CL" STA 26+93.59 8.50' LT 716.50 FS 0" CF "CON. CL" STA 26+07.22 22.74' RT, BEG FENCE "CON. CL" STA 26+47.59 2.50' RT, BEG AC PATH 715.96 FS LACFCD R / W CPP R / W SJC CL "CON. CL" STA 26+92.66 12.29' LT, END SW, JOIN EX

4.5' 4.8'
4'

11.3'

BIKEPATH

2.5' 8.8'

1.5%
11'

1.5%

1.5% (716.93 FS) "CON. CL" STA 26+87.66 13.30' LT "CON. CL" STA 26+93.59 10.00' LT END TRANS. "CON. CL" STA 27+03.59 8.50' LT 716.23 FS 1' CF 717.23 TC CON. CL 2:1
MAX 3:1 MAX

8.5' 2.5'
716
716 715
716
716
717 716716
716
715
715
716 CON. CL "CON. CL" STA 27+50.00 6.50' LT 715.00 FS "CON. CL" STA 27+30.00 8.50' LT 715.20 FS "CON. CL" STA 27+30.00 2.50' RT 715.04 FS "CON. CL" STA 27+50.00 6.50' RT 714.80 FS 716.20 TC 716.00 TC END FENCE, JOIN EX "CON. CL" STA 27+52.54 7.75' LT LACFCD R / W CPP R / W 11'
13'
BIKEPATH 20' TRANSITION

8.5' 2.5'

1.5%
4' "CON. CL" STA 27+30.07 10.00' LT
2:1
MAX
715
715 715

1.5% Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 KELLOGG DRIVE AND CAMPUS DRIVE SE CORNER 4 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
5 0 5 10 31 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C202 FA-2263 BE

MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW LEFT

MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
CON. CL

13.0'

BIKEPATH

11.0' 15.0' TRANSITION

2.1'

1.5% "CON. CL" STA 29+65.00 4.50' RT 716.41 FS "CON. CL" STA 29+50.00 6.50' RT 716.20 FS

6.5' 4.5' 717 2:1
MAX
6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 38+00 "CON. CL" STA 38+54.69 6.50' RT 721.72 FS "CON. CL" STA 37+83.95 6.50' RT 721.58 FS "CON. CL" STA 37+99.30 5.00' RT 721.59 FS "CON. CL" STA 38+39.34 5.00' RT 721.67 FS

5.0' 8.0'

5.0' 8.0'
R33.5'
R46.5'
R46.5'
R33.5'

6.5' 6.5'

6.5' 6.5' "CON. CL" STA 38+39.36 8.00' LT 721.88 FS "CON. CL" STA 37+99.28 8.00' LT 721.89 FS 722.29 TC BEG. FENCE, JOIN EX. "CON. CL" STA 37+83.95 6.50' LT 721.80 FS "CON. CL" STA 37+95.82 9.50' LT 722.30 TC "CON. CL" STA 38+54.69 6.50' LT 721.91 FS 722.41 TC R46.5'
R33.5'
R33.5'
R46.5' LACFCD R / W "CON. CL" STA 38+62.41 6.99' LT, END FENCE, JOIN EX 722.36 TC 722 722 722 "CON. CL" STA 37+91.22 7.22' LT 721.79 FS 722.29 TC "CON. CL" STA 37+93.20 5.59' RT 721.59 FS "CON. CL" STA 38+45.45 5.59' RT 721.69 FS

2.3'

1.4' "CON. CL" STA 38+41.91 9.50' LT "CON. CL" STA 38+48.20 7.09' LT 721.89 FS 722.39 TC

13.0'

BIKEPATH
2:1
MAX CON. CL EX. UTILITY

1.5% 1.5%

1.5%

1.5%
4''SS 4''SS 4''SS 4''SS 4''SS 4''SS 4''SS 4''SS SIGNSN SIGNSN (719.30 FL) "CON. CL" STA 30+78.82 18.29' LT, JOIN EX "CON. CL" STA 30+45.82 8.79' LT, JOIN EX (719.51 FS) "CON. CL" STA 30+45.82 18.29' LT, JOIN EX (719.51 TC) (719.04 FL) "CON. CL" STA 30+70.82 18.29' LT 719.35 TC 719.15 FL "CON. CL" STA 30+49.82 18.29' LT 719.59 TC 719.09 FL "CON. CL" STA 30+74.82 18.29' LT 719.29 FL "CON. CL" STA 30+78.82 8.79' LT, JOIN EX (719.53 FS) "CON. CL" STA 30+71.43 24.29' LT, JOIN EX (719.53 FS) "CON. CL" STA 30+71.42 19.79' LT 719.34 LIP "CON. CL" STA 30+78.82 19.79' LT, JOIN EX (719.47 LIP) "CON. CL" STA 30+45.82 19.79' LT, JOIN EX (719.19 LIP) "CON. CL" STA 30+45.82 24.29' LT, JOIN EX (719.33 FS) "CON. CL" STA 30+53.42 19.79' LT 719.22 LIP "CON. CL" STA 30+78.82 24.29' LT, JOIN EX (719.59 FS) "CON. CL" STA 30+53.42 24.29' LT, JOIN EX (719.39 FS) "CON. CL" STA 30+53.82 8.79' LT (719.80 FS) "CON. CL" STA 30+70.82 8.79' LT (719.93 FS)

9.5%

9.5%

1.3%

1.5% 0.8% 9.0% 0.7% 11.0%
(2.7%)

3.8%

4.2%

5.5' 4' 8' 17' 4' 4' 8'

4.5' 1.5'

9.5'

9.5' (3.6%) (5.0%) CAMPUS DR LACFCD R / W 31+00 "CON. CL" STA 30+53.82 18.29' LT 719.27 FL

6.5' 4.5'

7.8' 4.5' "CON. CL" STA 30+70.82 12.79' LT 719.87 FS

7.5' 4.5'

6.5' 4.5' END CONCRETE PAD, HANDRAIL BEG AC PATH "CON. CL" STA 31+04.00 4.50' RT 717.67 FS BEG TRANS., 1' CF, BEG FENCE, JOIN EX "CON. CL" STA 30+18.87 6.50' LT 717.20 FS 718.20 TC END TRANS., 1" CF END FENCE, JOIN EX. "CON. CL" STA 31+04.00 6.50' LT 717.83 FS 718.83 TC END CURB, END TRANS., 0" CF "CON. CL" STA 30+30.87 7.25' LT 717.97 FS BEG CURB, BEG TRANS., 0" CF "CON. CL" STA 30+94.12 6.98' LT 718.16 FS CPP R / W "CON. CL" STA 30+53.65 6.99' RT, END FENCE "CON. CL" STA 30+70.90 6.99' RT, BEG. FENCE "CON. CL" STA 30+53.55 3.21' RT, END HANDRAIL "CON. CL" STA 30+38.87 4.50' RT (718.02 FS) END AC PATH, BEG CONCRETE PAD, HANDRAIL "CON. CL" STA 30+18.87 4.50' RT 716.98 FS "CON. CL" STA 30+71.40 3.30' RT, BEG. HANDRAIL

1.5%

1.5% END CONCRETE PAD, JOIN EX "CON. CL" STA 30+38.87 7.75' LT (718.63 FS) "CON. CL" STA 30+84.00 4.50' RT (718.56 FS) JOIN EX, BEG CONCRETE PAD "CON. CL" STA 30+84.00 7.50' LT (719.03 FS) CON. CL 717 718 719 718 717 717 719 720 720 719 718 718 2:1
MAX
2:1
MAX 719.23 TC "CON. CL" STA 30+53.82 12.79' LT 719.75 FS 719.79 TC (719.31 TC) "CON. CL" STA 30+46.85 4.47' RT "CON. CL" STA 30+80.21 4.50' RT

13.0'
BIKEPATH 15.0' TRANSITION

1.5%

11.0' "CON. CL" STA 31+60.00 4.50' RT 717.82 FS "CON. CL" STA 31+75.00 6.50' RT 717.76 FS

6.5' 4.5' CON. CL 718 718
2:1
MAX Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 ENTRANCE TO BIKE PATH FROM MAINTENANCE BRIDGE NEAR STA 30+60 5 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 32 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.9.2024 C203 FA-2263 BF BIKE PATH NEAR UTILITY NEAR STA 38+25 6 SCALE: 1" = 5' 45+00 "CON. CL" STA 44+99.27 6.50' RT 727.47 FS "CON. CL" STA 45+54.71 5.00' RT 727.85 FS "CON. CL" STA 45+70.13 6.46' RT 727.92 FS "CON. CL" STA 45+54.71 8.00' LT 728.05 FS 728.55 TC

8.0' 5.0'

8.0' 5.0' "CON. CL" STA 45+70.13 6.50' LT, END FENCE, JOIN EX. 728.12 FS 728.62 TC "CON. CL" STA 45+14.69 5.00' RT 727.59 FS R46.5' R33.5' R46.5' R33.5' R46.5' R33.5' R46.5' R33.5' LACFCD R / W "CON. CL" STA 45+14.69 8.00' LT 727.80 FS 728.30 TC "CON. CL" STA 44+99.27 6.50' LT, BEG. FENCE, JOIN EX. 727.68 FS 728.18 TC

1.8'

13.0'

BIKEPATH

13.0'

BIKEPATH

6.5' 6.5' 728 728 CON. CL

1.6%

1.5%

1.6% CPP R / W "CON. CL" STA 45+05.61 7.10' LT 727.78 FS "CON. CL" STA 45+11.18 9.50' LT "CON. CL" STA 45+58.70 9.50' LT "CON. CL" STA 45+63.93 7.10' LT 728.17 FS 728.59 TC 728.23 TC "CON. CL" STA 45+07.97 5.65' RT 727.54 FS "CON. CL" STA 45+61.44 5.61' RT 727.88 FS POSTGDP 4" POSTGDP 4" POSTGDP 4" 57+00

1.75' 11.25' "CON. CL" STA 56+84.56 1.75' RT 734.41 FS "CON. CL" STA 56+84.56 11.25' LT 734.60 FS 735.60 TC "CON. CL" STA 56+57.40 6.50' LT BEG. FENCE, JOIN EX. 734.38 FS 735.38 TC R33.5' R46.5' R33.5' R46.5' LACFCD R / W CPP R / W "CON. CL" STA 56+57.38 6.29' RT 734.17 FS

13.0'

BIKEPATH

2.0' 735

6.5' 6.5'

4.5' CON. CL EX. BOLLARD

1.5%

1.5% "CON. CL" STA 56+68.77 8.49' LT 734.64 FS 735.47 TC "CON. CL" STA 56+79.31 12.75' LT "CON. CL" STA 56+73.19 3.74' RT 734.32 FS POSTGDP 8" POSTGDP 8" 58+00

1.75' 11.25' "CON. CL" STA 58+55.75 11.25' LT 735.62 FS 736.62 TC "CON. CL" STA 58+82.90 6.50' LT 735.70 FS END TRANS., BEG 6" CF END FENCE, JOIN EX. 736.20 TCR33.5' R46.5' R33.5' R46.5' LACFCD R / W CPP R / W "CON. CL" STA 58+55.75 1.75' RT 735.43 FS "CON. CL" STA 58+82.90 6.45' RT 735.44 FS "CON. CL" STA 58+71.53 8.49' LT END 1' CF, BEG TRANS. 737.67 TC 736.67 FS

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF POMONA LACFCD R / W

13.0'

BIKEPATH

3.6' 735

6.5' 6.5' CON. CL 735

4.7' EX. BOLLARD 736

1.5%

1.6%

1.50' "CON. CL" STA 58+61.31 12.75' LT "CON. CL" STA 58+67.12 3.74' RT 735.46 FS Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 33 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.9.2024 C204 FA-2263 BG BIKE PATH NEAR UTILITY NEAR STA 45+35 7 SCALE: 1" = 5' BIKE PATH NEAR UTILITIES NEAR STA 57+50 8 SCALE: 1" = 5'

MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW LEFT

MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
63+00 "CON. CL" STA 62+69.60 6.50' LT 737.31 FS END 6" CF, BEG TRANS. BEG. FENCE, JOIN EX. 737.81 TC "CON. CL" STA 62+69.60 6.50' RT 737.11 FS "CON. CL" STA 63+00.00 0.50' RT 737.48 FS "CON. CL" STA 63+00.00 12.50' LT 737.67 FS 738.67 TC

6.5' 6.5' R46.5' R33.5'
R46.5'
R33.5' LACFCD R / W "CON. CL" STA 62+82.33 9.01' LT 737.46 FS END TRANS., BEG 1" CF 738.46 TC 737

13.0'
BIKEPATHCON. CL 737

1.5%
2:1
MAX "CON. CL" STA 62+87.27 3.01' RT 737.32 FS "CON. CL" STA 62+93.86 13.99' LT 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 65+00 "CON. CL" STA 65+70.01 6.50' LT 739.83 FS END 1' CF, END FENCE, JOIN EX. 740.83 TC "CON. CL" STA 65+30.15 0.50' RT 739.45 FS R33.5' R46.5' R33.5' R46.5'

0.5' 12.5'

6.5' 6.5' "CON. CL" STA 65+60.50 6.50' RT 739.52 FS LACFCD R / W "CON. CL" STA 65+60.50 6.50' LT 739.78 FS 740.78 TC

13.0'
BIKEPATH 741 740 740 CON. CL 740 739

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%
2:1
MAX
2:1
MAX
6'

4.2'741 740 "CON. CL" STA 65+53.91 14.58' LT "CON. CL" STA 65+46.81 9.25' LT 739.68 FS 740.68 TC "CON. CL" STA 65+30.09 12.50' LT 740.00 FS 741.00 TC LIMITS OF GRADING Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 34 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.5.2024 C205 FA-2263 BH BIKE PATH NEAR UTILITY NEAR STA 62+75 9 SCALE: 1" = 5' BIKE PATH NEAR UTILITY NEAR STA 64+00 10 SCALE: 1" = 5'

MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW LEFT

MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS TS
TSSL
TRD 18" S SMH LID SIGNSN TS TSSL TRD 18" CAMPUS DR 69+00 70+00 CON. CL

5.3%

1.5% 7.5% 1.7%

1.5%0.7%1.0%

1.5%

1.5% 3.9%

1.5% 747.35 FL 747.83 TC "CON. CL" STA 70+24.80 3.50' RT 746.09 FS 746.90 TC "CON. CL" STA 69+92.00 13.50' LT 746.03 FS 747.03 TC END SW, CURB BEG AC PATH "CON. CL" STA 70+04.00 6.50' LT 745.90 FS 746.96 TC "CON. CL" STA 70+00.00 13.50' LT 745.96 FS BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX "CON. CL" STA 69+14.97 18.75' LT (747.30 FL) (747.79 TC) 747.34 FL "CON. CL" STA 69+19.97 18.75' LT, 0" CF END C&G, JOIN EX "CON. CL" STA 69+31.58 18.75' LT (747.40 FL) (747.98 TC) 747.58 FS "CON. CL" STA 69+14.97 13.50' LT "CON. CL" STA 69+25.00 3.50' RT 744.08 FS "CON. CL" STA 69+00.00 6.50' RT 743.74 FS 744.41 FS END 6" CF, BEG WALL "CON. CL" STA 69+14.47 6.50' LT 747.49 TW 744.25 FS "CON. CL" STA 69+26.47 6.50' LT END WALL "CON. CL" STA 69+92.00 6.50' LT, 0" CF 745.78 FS BEG FENCE, JOIN EX "CON. CL" STA 70+24.42 8.25' LT "CON. CL" STA 70+24.58 6.50' LT 746.23 FS 747.71 TW

6.3% "CON. CL" STA 69+14.97

1.5% 7.50' LT 747.49 FS "CON. CL" STA 69+19.97 13.50' LT 747.67 FS "CON. CL" STA 69+19.97 7.50' LT 747.58 FS "CON. CL" STA 69+26.47 7.50' LT 747.71 FS 50.5' 11.1' 10'
BIKEPATH 8' 12' 20.6' 5' 6.5' TRANSITION 5.1'
2'

5.25' 6'
6'
7'
13'

BIKEPATH
10'

1.5% 25.0' TRANSITION "CON. CL" STA 69+41.47 13.50' LT 748.00 FS "CON. CL" STA 69+26.47 18.75' LT BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. "CON. CL" STA 69+50.00 13.50' LT 747.86 FS 0" CF END TRANS. "CON. CL" STA 69+60.00 13.50' LT 747.44 FS 1' CF 748.44 TC 2' LACFCD R / W CPP R / W 746 747 745
3:1
MAX 744 745 746 747 746 745

6.5' 3.5'
3:1

MAX LIMITS OF GRADING

3.3'
12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W TRD 24" 71+00 CON. CL "CON. CL" STA 70+64.74 0.50' RT 747.76 FS "CON. CL" STA 71+30.00 0.50' RT 747.88 FS "CON. CL" STA 71+70.00 6.50' RT 746.81 FS "CON. CL" STA 71+30.00 9.50' LT "CON. CL" STA 71+70.00 6.50' LT 747.00 FS 748.00 TC "CON. CL" STA 70+64.53 748.03 FS 9.50' LT 747.90 FS END FENCE, JOIN EX. "CON. CL" STA 71+69.98 8.01' LT

1.5% 40' TRANSITION
10'

1.5%

1.5% BEG CURB, BEG TRANS. "CON. CL" STA 71+39.96 8.75' LT 747.75 FS 0" CF END TRANS. "CON. CL" STA 71+49.93 8.00' LT 747.44 FS 1' CF 748.44 TC 13'

BIKEPATH
10' 40' TRANSITION 748 748 747 LACFCD R / W CPP R / W 746 747 747 747 747 9' 1' "CON. CL" STA 70+64.47 11.00' LT "CON. CL" STA 71+30.06 11.00' LT 3:1
MAX
3:1

MAX LIMITS OF GRADING
3'

6.1'
9' 1' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE AND CAMPUS DRIVE CONNECTION 11 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 35 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.5.2024 C206 FA-2263 BI

MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW LEFT

MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE RIGHT

4.5'
SIDE
WALK 15' 10' 15'
13'
BIKEPATH END SW, 6" CURB END FENCE, JOIN EX. "CON. CL" STA 86+90.13 7.99' LT 765.40 TC "CON. CL" STA 86+55.16 11.00' LT 765.29 TC 764.79 FS BEG SW "CON. CL" STA 86+40.16 6.50' LT 765.15 TC 764.65 FS CON. CL "CON. CL" STA 86+90.13 6.50' LT 764.88 FS764.90 FS BEG FENCE, JOIN EX. "CON. CL" STA 86+46.81 10.06' LT "CON. CL" STA 86+75.33 12.50' LT 10' "CON. CL" STA 86+75.18 11.00' LT 765.38 TC 765.00 FS "CON. CL" STA 86+54.94 12.50' LT 15'

BIKEPATH

8.5' 6.5' 765
765
765
8''G 8''G
8''G
8''G
8''G
8''G
8''G
8''G
21''W 21''W 21''W
21''W
21''W
21''W
21''W
21''W
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH WM
16+00 RIDGEWAY ST
88+96 88+00

LACFCD R/W
LACFCD R/W (2.7%)
(1.4%)

8.0% 8.0% 1.5%

1.5%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

10.0%

9.6% 4.4%

4.4%

3.0%

3.3%

1.4%

1.6%

2.3%

16.2'

4.5'

5.5' 4' 5.5' 5.5'

5.7' 5.0%

6.5' 1.5'2'

10.1' 10.0' TRANSITION
13'
R302.1'
R306.5'
15'
BIKEPATH BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "R" STA 15+85.01 27.38' RT (771.06 TC) CON. CL "R" STA 15+84.60 25.93' RT (770.67 LIP) "R" STA 16+11.61 20.00' RT (770.65 FS) END SW, DWY, C&G, JOIN EX. "R" STA 16+12.97 23.50' RT (771.23 TC) "R" STA 16+12.97 22.00' RT (770.63 LIP) (770.58 FL) "R" STA 15+89.69 22.52' RT (770.76 FS) END 6" CURB "R" STA 15+91.27 35.52' RT 771.13 BW, 0" CF "R" STA 15+90.14 24.47' RT 770.66 LIP "R" STA 16+06.99 33.13' RT 771.08 BW"R" STA 16+08.30 33.07' RT 771.11 BW "R" STA 15+86.52 32.67' RT (771.21 BW) "R" STA 16+12.97 29.20' RT (771.31 BW) "R" STA 16+06.39 22.14' RT 770.64 LIP "R" STA 16+06.28 20.15' RT (770.70 FS) BEG DWY "R" STA 15+86.13 27.06' RT 771.05 TC 770.60 FL "R" STA 15+91.99 31.23' RT 771.04 FS "R" STA 16+06.77 29.13' RT 771.02 FS "R" STA 15+90.46 25.80' RT 770.60 FL, 0" CF "R" STA 16+06.46 23.51' RT 770.58 FL, 0" CF (770.60 FL) "R" "R" STA 15+93.09 35.08' RT 771.10 BW "R" STA 15+84.05 24.01' RT (770.78 FS) BEG 6" CURB "CON. CL" STA 87+91.33 6.50' LT 767.36 TC "CON. CL" STA 88+53.53 6.50' LT 770.90 FS 771.40 TC 766.86 FS "CON. CL" STA 87+81.12 8.50' LT 766.62 FS "CON. CL" STA 88+11.10 6.50' LT 767.72 FS 768.22 TC"CON. CL" STA 88+11.10 6.50' RT 767.46 FS "CON. CL" STA 87+83.66 6.50' RT 766.38 FS "CON. CL" STA 88+61.58 14.88' RT, END FENCE 2:1
MAX
13'
BIKEPATH EX. UTILITY
1'

1.5%

1.5%
767

1.5%
768
769
770
771
771
770
769
768
767
766
771
8''G 8''G
8''G
8''G
8''G
8''G
8''G
21''W 21''W
21''W
21''W
21''W
21''W
21''W
21''W
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH

OH OH OH OH OH OH
SIGN
SIGN
PP
PP 1525002E 89+30

LACFCD R/W
(6.3%) (3.0%)

1.9%

2.3%

3.7% 3.7%

0.3% 4.5% 3.5%1.9% 4.0%0.0%

0.3% 8.0% 7.9%

9.5% 9.5%

0.9%
4' 16'
4' 2' 4' 5.5'

2.5' 6.6' 5.6'
5'

6.1'
3'
14' 2' 1' 1.3'

1.4'

4.5%

0.3% (0.3%)

3.5'"R" STA 16+80.16 20.47' RT (770.53 FS) END SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "R" STA 16+80.16 23.76' RT (770.39 FL) "R" STA 16+80.16 22.47' RT (770.47 LIP) (770.84 TC) "R" STA 16+80.16 29.35' RT (771.00 BW) "R" STA 16+71.16 33.00' RT (770.86 BW) "R" STA 16+68.70 33.00' RT 770.81 BW "R" STA 16+53.24 29.00' RT 770.89 FS "R" STA 16+51.31 33.00' RT (770.99 BW) "R" STA 16+54.27 33.00' RT (770.88 BW) "R" STA 16+54.68 35.00' RT (770.79 FS) "R" STA 16+68.63 35.00' RT (770.72 FS) "R" STA 16+47.02 28.69' RT (771.21 BW) BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "R" STA 16+45.99 23.75' RT (770.47 FL) "R" STA 16+45.45 20.50' RT (770.52 FS) "R" STA 16+45.77 22.32' RT (770.49 LIP) (770.88 TC) END DWY "R" STA 16+73.24 23.50' RT 770.40 FL 770.82 TC BEG DWY "R" STA 16+49.24 23.50' RT 770.46 FL 770.87 TC "R" STA 16+69.24 23.50' RT 770.41 FL, 0" CF "R" STA 16+53.24 23.50' RT 770.45 FL, 0" CF"R" STA 16+69.24 22.50' RT 770.45 LIP "R" STA 16+53.24 22.50' RT 770.49 LIP "R" STA 16+69.24 20.50' RT (770.48 FS) "R" STA 16+53.24 20.50' RT (770.49 FS) "R" STA 16+69.24 29.00' RT 770.85 FS "R" STA 16+76.66 29.35' RT (770.99 BW) 770
771
771 771

LACFCD R/W
3'
13'

BIKEPATH
13'

3.5'

1.5% LACFCD R / W 20' TRANSITION 22.5' 20' TRANSITION CON. CL END AC, BEG PCC "CON. CL" STA 77+45.10 3.00' LT 751.90 FS END PCC, BEG AC "CON. CL" STA 77+67.60 3.00' LT 752.20 FS "CON. CL" STA 77+87.60 6.50' LT 753.88 FS "CON. CL" STA 77+25.10 6.50' LT 753.19 FS END AC, BEG PCC "CON. CL" STA 77+45.10 6.50' RT 751.78 FS END PCC, BEG AC "CON. CL" STA 77+67.60 6.50' RT 752.06 FS

6.5' EX. UTILITY

1.5%

1.5%

9.5'
753
752
752
753
753
752
752
753 Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 ACCESS AREA DETAIL - STA 86+65 +/- 13 SCALE: 1" = 5' DRIVEWAY DETAIL - RIDGEWAY STREET (NW) 14 SCALE: 1" = 5' DRIVEWAY DETAIL - RIDGEWAY STREET (SW) 15 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 36 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C207 FA-2263 BJ BIKE PATH NEAR UTILITY NEAR STA 77+50 12 SCALE: 1" = 5' OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH POSTPOST 1.5"

FAIRPLEX DR
119+00 CON. CL

LACFCD R/W
R/W (3.8%) 8.0% 0.6% 8.0% 1.7%

0.5%

3.1%

1.6%

1.6%

9.9%

9.8%

3.4%

3.4% (2.0%)

0.3%

0.3% 4.7%4.0% 5.0% 2.7% 4' 6' 3'
4'

5.6'
5'

4.3' 6.5'

4.7' 6.3'

2.3' 2.3' 1.5' 1.5'

1.9'
16' DWY
R132'
R118'
14' BIKEPATH "F" STA 20+23.94 27.50' RT (799.64 FS) "F" STA 20+23.94 38.51' RT (800.28 BW) END SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "F" STA 20+23.94 32.00' RT (799.36 FL) "F" STA 20+23.94 30.50' RT (799.54 LIP) (800.05 TC) "F" STA 20+12.94 32.00' RT 799.33 FL, 0" CF "F" STA 20+12.94 27.50' RT (799.55 FS) "F" STA 20+12.94 30.50' RT 799.40 LIP "F" STA 19+96.94 32.00' RT 799.29 FL, 0" CF "F" STA 19+96.94 30.50' RT 799.33 LIP "F" STA 19+96.94 27.50' RT (799.45 FS) "F" STA 19+89.96 27.50' RT (799.39 FS) BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "F" STA 19+89.99 32.00' RT (799.18 FL) "F" STA 19+89.98 30.50' RT (799.27 LIP) (799.80 TC) "F" STA 19+90.03 38.32' RT (799.92 BW) "F" STA 20+15.23 42.00' RT 799.95 BW "F" STA 20+12.94 38.00' RT "F" STA 20+12.94 799.81 FS 42.00' RT 799.88 BW "F" STA 19+96.94 42.00' RT 799.80 BW "F" STA 19+94.64 42.00' RT 799.83 BW "F" STA 19+91.90 38.23' RT 799.91 BW "F" STA 20+19.67 38.58' RT 800.14 BW "F" STA 19+96.94 38.00' RT 799.77 FS END DWY "F" STA 20+17.94 32.00' RT 799.34 FL 799.82 TC BEG DWY "F" STA 19+92.94 32.00' RT 799.19 FL 799.69 TC "CON. CL" STA 119+32.53 7.00' LT 799.50 FS "CON. CL" STA 118+87.90 7.00' RT 796.07 FS "CON. CL" STA 118+87.90 7.00' LT 795.84 FS "CON. CL" STA 119+32.53 7.00' RT 799.73 FS "CON. CL" STA 119+37.96 21.40' LT, END FENCE 796
797
798
799
795
796 797 798
799 800
800
800
2:1 MAX
2:1

1.5%

0.5%
8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W SAN
12''W
12''W
12''W
12''W 12''W 10''W 10''W
12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) 10''SS
10''SS
10''SS
10''SS 10''SS 10''SS 10''SS 10''SS

SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN) SS(ABAN)
OH
OH
OH
OH
WV
WV WV
WV S

SMH LID
S

SMH LID
RIDGWAY ST 89+30
90+00 LACFCD R/W
10'
15'

5.4'

9.6'

4.5'
SIDE
WALK
14'
BIKEPATH CON. CL
R/W R/W (3.1%) 8.0% 8.0% 1.5%1.5% (1.1%)

1.0%

1.0%

1.0% 4.5% 0.7%4.5% 0.0%

6.9% 12.6%

4.8%

4.8%

1.8% 1.8% 1' 5' 4' 2'

1.7' 1.3'

4.5'
16' DWY

5.2' 6.2'

4.6' 1.7'

1.7'

3.5' 6.7' "R"
R193'
R207'
R200' "CON. CL" STA 90+28.57 11.50' RT 769.44 FS BEG SW "CON. CL" STA 90+13.59 7.00' RT 769.35 FS "CON. CL" STA 90+48.58 11.50' RT 769.94 FS END SW "CON. CL" STA 90+63.95 7.00' RT 770.26 FS "R" STA 16+64.23 30.45' LT (770.87 BW) BEG SW, DWY, C&G, JOIN EX. "R" STA 16+64.23 23.73' LT (770.16 FL) (770.67 TC) "R" STA 16+64.23 22.41' LT (770.32 LIP) "R" STA 16+64.23 20.50' LT (770.32 FS) "R" STA 16+38.12 29.99' LT (771.24 BW) END SW, DWY, C&G, JOIN EX. "R" STA 16+38.50 23.78' LT (770.51 FL) (771.18 TC) "R" STA 16+38.77 22.14' LT (770.53 LIP) "R" STA 16+39.00 20.50' LT (770.55 FS) "R" STA 16+59.73 23.50' LT 770.32 FL, 0" CF "R" STA 16+59.73 32.50' LT 770.78 BW "R" STA 16+43.73 23.50' LT 770.48 FL, 0" CF "R" STA 16+59.73 22.50' LT 770.36 LIP "R" STA 16+59.73 20.50' LT (770.36 FS) "R" STA 16+43.73 20.50' LT (770.51 FS) "R" STA 16+43.73 32.50' LT 770.94 BW "R" STA 16+61.45 32.50' LT 770.81 BW "R" STA 16+42.01 32.50' LT 771.02 BW "R" STA 16+59.73 28.50' LT 770.72 FS "R" STA 16+43.73 28.50' LT 770.88 FS "CON. CL" STA 89+94.25 7.00' RT 770.02 FS "CON. CL" STA 89+94.25 7.00' LT 769.69 FS "CON. CL" STA 90+48.00 7.00' LT 769.59 FS "CON. CL" STA 89+65.70 7.00' LT 770.70 FS "CON. CL" STA 89+65.70 7.00' RT 771.03 FS "CON. CL" STA 89+59.97 14.06' LT, BEG FENCE 770 769
770 771
770
769
770
771
MAX
3:1
14'

BIKEPATH
10'

1.5%

1.5%

1.5% 118+00

4.5'
SIDE
WALK 15' 10' 15' LACFCD R/W
14'
BIKEPATH "CON. CL" STA 118+17.89 11.50' RT 793.54 FS BEG SW "CON. CL" STA 118+02.89 7.00' RT 793.36 FS "CON. CL" STA 118+37.89 11.50' RT 793.75 FS END SW "CON. CL" STA 118+52.89 7.00' RT 793.90 FS CON. CL 794
793
794 10'

0.5%

0.5% Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 ACCESS AREA AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL - RIDGEWAY STREET (SE) 16 SCALE: 1" = 5' ACCESS AREA AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL - FAIRPLEX DRIVE (SW) 17 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 37 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C208 FA-2263 BK

LACFCD R/W
R/W (1.9%) (2.7%) 10.0%

7.9% 7.5% 7.6% 1.5% 1.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.8%

0.4%

0.8% 4.3% 0.5% 1.2%

1.1% 3.9%4.5% 2.5%4.8% 5.6' 7.7' 2' 7.5' 4' 6'
(2.6%)
16' DWY 6.7' 5'

11.6'

3.9' 7.1'

3.8' 5.4' 1.3' 1.3'

3.2' 1' BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "F" STA 19+93.31 31.75' LT (799.20 FL) (799.85 TC) "F" STA 19+93.31 30.25' LT (799.34 LIP) "F" STA 19+93.31 28.50' LT (799.42 FS) "F" STA 19+93.31 37.17' LT (799.95 BW) "F" STA 19+60.78 30.39' LT (798.99 LIP) "F" STA 19+61.02 28.50' LT (799.09 FS) "F" STA 19+59.93 37.22' LT (799.81 BW) BEG DWY "F" STA 19+88.31 31.50' LT 799.19 FL 799.68 TC "F" STA 19+83.31 30.50' LT 799.23 LIP "F" STA 19+83.31 28.50' LT (799.30 FS) "F" STA 19+83.31 31.50' LT 799.18 FL, 0" CF"F" STA 19+67.31 30.50' LT 799.15 LIP "F" STA 19+67.31 28.50' LT (799.20 FS) "F" STA 19+67.31 31.50' LT 799.10 FL, 0" CF "F" STA 19+83.31 39.00' LT 799.75 FS "F" STA 19+89.51 37.20' LT (799.91 BW) "F" STA 19+85.37 43.00' LT (799.83 BW) "F" STA 19+83.31 43.00' LT (799.81 BW) BEG AC "F" STA 19+81.48 43.00' LT (799.80 BW) END AC "F" STA 19+79.56 49.00' LT (800.07 FS) "F" STA 19+67.97 49.00' LT (799.76 FS) "F" STA 19+68.21 43.00' LT (799.73 BW) "F" STA 19+67.31 43.00' LT (799.73 BW) "F" STA 19+64.99 43.00' LT (799.74 BW) "F" STA 19+67.31 39.00' LT 799.67 FS FAIRPLEX DR END SW, DWY, C&G, JOIN EX. "F" STA 19+60.62 31.66' LT (799.03 FL) (799.66 TC) 800 800 797 798 799 800 ERERSR 1" GA SIGN GA SIGN FAIRPLEX DR (2.6%) (3.1%) 7.9% 7.9% 1.5% 1.5%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

3.8%

4.9%

10.0% 10.0% 2.0%2.7% 3.5%2.0%
5' 16' DWY 6' 5.3' 4'

1.4'6.1'

1.9' 5.2'

1.6' 6.2' 4.6' 2' 1.5'

2.5% 2.8%3.6% 120+00 CON. CL LACFCD R/W
R/W
R/W "F" STA 19+01.90 30.20' LT 798.72 LIP "F" STA 19+01.90 28.20' LT (798.76 FS) END SW, DWY, C&G, JOIN EX. "F" STA 18+96.90 31.70' LT (799.18 TC) "F" STA 18+96.90 37.90' LT (799.33 BW) (798.52 FL) "F" STA 18+96.90 30.20' LT (798.66 LIP) "F" STA 18+96.90 28.20' LT (798.75 FS) "F" STA 19+00.29 41.00' LT 799.20 BW "F" STA 19+01.90 41.00' LT, BEG CURB 799.16 FS 6" CF "F" STA 19+25.90 37.20' LT (799.59 BW) "F" STA 19+24.06 37.20' LT (799.50 BW) "F" STA 19+17.90 30.20' LT 798.77 LIP "F" STA 19+17.90 28.20' LT (798.84 FS) BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "F" STA 19+27.40 31.70' LT (799.43 TC) (798.76 FL) "F" STA 19+27.40 28.20' LT (798.89 FS) "F" STA 19+17.90 31.70' LT 798.74 FL 0" CF "F" STA 19+01.90 31.70' LT 798.68 FL 0" CF "F" STA 19+01.90 37.00' LT 799.10 FS BEG DWY "F" STA 19+23.90 31.70' LT 799.34 TC 798.75 FL "F" STA 19+17.90 37.00' LT 799.16 FS "F" STA 19+17.90 41.00' LT 799.22 BW "F" STA 19+19.31 41.00' LT 799.27 BW "F" STA 19+27.40 30.20' LT (798.78 LIP) "CON. CL" STA 120+16.32 16.29' RT, BEG FENCE 799.66 TC "CON. CL" STA 120+31.76 6.50' RT 798.67 FS "CON. CL" STA 120+31.76 6.50' LT 798.94 FS 799.44 TC 799 798 799 798 2:1 1.5% 13' BIKEPATH 121+00 CON. CL LACFCD R/W

4.5' 12.9' 2.3' 10.6' 14.8'
13'

BIKEPATH
R243.5'
R256.5' "CON. CL" STA 121+05.59 11.00' LT 795.63 FS 796.63 TC END SW, 1' CF, BEG TRANS. "CON. CL" STA 121+40.40 6.50' LT 796.05 FS 796.55 TC END TRANS., BEG 1' CF, SW "CON. CL" STA 120+90.00 6.50' LT 795.44 FS 796.44 TC "CON. CL" STA 121+25.62 11.00' LT 795.91 FS 796.91 TC "CON. CL" STA 121+03.27 6.50' RT 795.32 FS "CON. CL" STA 120+64.35 6.50' RT 796.43 FS "CON. CL" STA 120+64.35 6.50' LT 796.70 FS 797.20 TC 797796 796 797 796 796 2:1 MAX 1.5%

1.5%

1.5% 9.4' END 6" CF, BEG TRANS. "CON. CL" STA 120+79.65 6.50' LT 795.71 FS 796.21 TC BEG FENCE, JOIN EX "CON. CL" STA 120+88.36 7.55' LT END FENCE, JOIN EX. "CON. CL" STA 121+40.63 8.00' LT END TRANS., BEG 6" CF "CON. CL" STA 121+50.48 6.50' LT 796.19 FS 796.69 TC Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 DRIVEWAY DETAIL - FAIRPLEX DRIVE (SE) 19 SCALE: 1" = 5' ACCESS AREA AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL - FAIRPLEX DRIVE (NE) 18 SCALE: 1" = 5' 38 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.5.2024 C209 FA-2263 BL 135+00 CON. CL LACFCD R/W

4.5'
SIDE
WALK 15' 1.5' 10' 13.2'
14'

BIKEPATH
R243'
R257' "CON. CL" STA 134+53.67 7.00' LT 810.86 FS "CON. CL" STA 134+68.67 11.50' LT 811.10 FS "CON. CL" STA 134+88.67 11.50' LT 811.32 FS "CON. CL" STA 135+03.68 7.00' LT 811.49 FS "CON. CL" STA 134+90.13 7.00' RT 811.04 FS "CON. CL" STA 135+24.43 7.00' LT 812.59 FS"CON. CL" STA 135+24.43 7.00' RT 812.31 FS 812 813 2:1 MAX 2:1

1.5%

1.5% 811 10' 811 812
8''G 8''G 8''G 8''G 8''G (2.9%) (3.7%)(1.4%) 1.5% 7.5% 1.5% 7.5%

0.9%

0.4%

9.4%

7.3% 4.0%4.0%2.0% 5.0% 1.7%

3.8% 1.5%
16' DWY 4' 6.5' 7.5' 1.2' 2' 1.5'

5.5'
6' 3.5' 6.7'

2.7' 11.7' 5.9'

R/W R/W
GLEN
136+00LACFCD R/W CON. CL (817.65 FL) BEG SW, DWY, C&G, JOIN EX. "G" STA 15+48.50 19.70' RT (818.16 TC) "G" STA 15+70.50 18.42' RT 817.78 FL 0" CF "G" STA 15+48.50 29.90' RT (818.49 BW) 817.80 FL "G" STA 15+48.50 16.49' RT (817.85 FS) "G" STA 15+48.50 18.50' RT (817.80 LIP) "G" STA 15+54.50 15.85' RT (817.87 FS) "G" STA 15+70.50 14.92' RT (817.88 FS) "G" STA 15+82.88 14.20' RT (817.86 FS) "G" STA 15+70.50 25.90' RT 818.34 FS "G" STA 15+48.50 26.40' RT (818.39 FS) "G" STA 15+54.50 29.90' RT 818.26 BW "G" STA 15+70.50 29.90' RT 818.40 BW"G" STA 15+73.16 29.90' RT 818.44 BW "G" STA 15+83.00 23.60' RT (818.64 BW) (817.83 FL) END SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "G" STA 15+83.00 17.70' RT (818.56 TC) "G" STA 15+83.00 16.20' RT (817.85 LIP) "G" STA 15+70.50 16.92' RT 817.84 LIP END DWY "G" STA 15+76.00 18.11' RT 818.30 TC "G" STA 15+54.50 25.90' RT 818.20 FS "G" STA 15+54.50 19.35' RT 817.71 FL 0" CF "CON. CL" STA 136+19.47 21.88' RT, END FENCE "G" STA 15+54.50 17.85' RT 817.77 LIP 2:1 MAX MAX 2:1 1.5% 14' BIKEPATH 818 8''SS
8''W
8''W 8''W 8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH WVWV COCO TRD 36" 915+00 4.0% 3.9% 3.5% 1.4% 0.2% 5.2% 7.1% 10.0% 10.0% (3.3%)(2.0%) 0.1%0.3% 0.6% 2.3% 0.9% 2' 1' 6.5' 5' 5' 5' 6.5' 16' 3.4' 2.8% 1.8' 0.9% 33.5' 1.5' 2' 2' 1.5' 5.5' 4.0% 5.5' 10.2' 4.9' 16' DWY GLEN AVE 137+00 138+00 R/W LACFCD R/W LACFCD R/W CON. CL

4.5'
SIDE
WALK 13.9' 10' 1.2' 15'
14'

BIKEPATH
R107'
R93'
R243'
R257'
OIN EX.
5+48.50

9.70' RT
15+48.50

6.49' RT

7.85 FS)
A 15+70.50 14.92' RT
817.88 FS)
15+83.00

6.20' RT

7.85 LIP) "G" STA 15+50.02 26.30' LT (818.48 BW) (817.88 FL) "G" STA 15+82.00 23.30' LT (818.34 BW) "G" STA 15+71.00 25.00' LT 818.21 FS "G" STA 15+74.36 30.00' LT 818.25 BW "G" STA 15+71.00 30.00' LT 818.22 BW BEG DWY "G" STA 15+76.00 18.18' LT 818.37 TC 817.87 FL END SW, DWY, JOIN EX. "G" STA 15+50.00 19.80' LT (818.36 TC) 817.86 FL (817.84 FL) END C&G, JOIN EX. "G" STA 15+16.50 19.80' LT (818.33 TC) "G" STA 15+49.94 18.30' LT 817.93 LIP "G" STA 15+49.88 16.30' LT (818.02 FS) "G" STA 15+55.00 30.00' LT 818.32 BW BEG CURB, SW "CON. CL" STA 137+55.67 7.00' LT 813.96 FS 814.96 TC "CON. CL" STA 137+71.10 11.50' LT 814.25 FS 815.25 TC END CURB, SW "CON. CL" STA 138+06.10 7.00' LT 814.60 FS 815.60 TC "CON. CL" STA 137+91.08 11.49' LT 814.50 FS 815.50 TC "G" STA 15+53.18 30.00' LT 818.37 BW "G" STA 15+55.00 25.00' LT 818.25 FS "G" STA 15+55.00 15.98' LT (818.00 FS) "G" STA 15+71.00 14.98' LT (818.00 FS) "G" STA 15+55.00 17.98' LT 817.92 LIP "G" STA 15+71.00 16.98' LT 817.93 LIP "G" STA 15+55.00 19.49' LT 817.86 FL, 0" CF "G" STA 15+71.00 18.49' LT 817.87 FL, 0" CF "G" STA 15+75.92 14.67' LT (817.95 FS) "G" STA 15+75.97 16.67' LT 817.88 LIP "G" STA 15+82.00 14.80' LT (817.86 FS) "G" STA 15+82.00 16.80' LT (817.83 LIP) "G" STA 15+16.50 16.30' LT (818.01 FS) "G" STA 15+16.50 18.30' LT (817.96 LIP) "CON. CL" STA 136+83.89 7.00' LT 818.06 FS "CON. CL" STA 136+83.89 7.00' RT 817.78 FS "CON. CL" STA 137+11.47 7.00' RT 815.63 FS "CON. CL" STA 137+11.47 7.00' LT 815.91 FS "CON. CL" STA 137+69.95 7.00' RT 813.94 FS "CON. CL" STA 136+66.93 20.09' RT, BEG FENCE A 15+54.50 17.85' RT 817.77 LIP BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "G" STA 15+82.00 17.80' LT (818.52 TC) 818 817 816 815 814 814 815 2:1 MAX 1.5%1.5%

1.5%

1.5% 815 814 816 817 818 814 815 CON. CL 14' BIKEPATH 10' "G" Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 ACCESS AREA AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL - GLEN AVENUE (NE) 21 SCALE: 1" = 5' ACCESS AREA AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL - GLEN AVENUE (NW) 20 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 39 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C210 FA-2263 BM 3''G
24''W 24''W 24''W
24''W
24''W
24''W
24''W
24''W
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH 3''G 3''G
3''G 3''G 3''G 3''G 3''G
GV
GV
WV
WV WV
WV LP
SL
PP
PP 982351E
DUDLEY ST 149+00 (0.0%) (1.2%) 8.1% 1.8% 8.1% 1.7%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

9.4% 10.0%

3.6%

1.9%

3.9%

2.0% 3.1% 1.4% 0.8% 0.0% 5.7' 1.3' 6.5'

7.1'

5.3' 16' DWY 5.5'

6.1'
3' 4' 4.2'

6.5'

1.6%
R/W R/W CON. CL CON. CL
10'

15.1'

15.1'

4.5'

SIDE WALK
R134'
R146' LACFCD R/W
14'
12'

BIKEPATH
17' "D" STA 12+88.70 24.80' LT (830.10 FS) "D" STA 12+88.70 37.30' LT (830.74 BW) (830.09 FL) END SW, C&G, DWY, JOIN EX. "D" STA 12+88.70 31.80' LT (830.74 TC) "D" STA 12+88.70 30.50' LT (830.07 LIP) (830.12 FL) BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "D" STA 13+22.0031.80' LT (830.80 TC) END CURB "D" STA 13+22.00 38.30' LT (830.88 BW), 0" CF "D" STA 13+22.00 24.80' LT (830.24 FS) "D" STA 13+22.00 30.50' LT (830.20 LIP) "D" STA 12+95.20 31.80' LT 830.09 FL 0" CF "D" STA 13+11.20 30.50' LT 830.15 LIP "D" STA 12+95.20 40.00' LT 830.50 BW "D" STA 13+11.20 31.80' LT 830.11 FL 0" CF "D" STA 12+95.20 30.50' LT 830.10 LIP BEG CURB "D" STA 13+11.20 40.00' LT 830.52 BW, 0" CF "D" STA 12+94.14 40.00' LT 830.52 BW "D" STA 13+11.20 24.80' LT (830.23 FS) "D" STA 12+95.20 24.80' LT (830.10 FS) BEG DWY "D" STA 13+16.50 31.80' LT 830.61 TC "D" STA 13+12.46 830.11 FL 40.00' LT 830.54 FS (830.86 TC) "D" STA 13+14.89 38.30' LT 830.60 FS (830.89 TC) "D" STA 12+95.20 36.00' LT 830.43 FS "D" STA 13+11.20 36.00' LT 830.45 FS "CON. CL" STA 148+39.96 2.50' LT 824.19 FS "CON. CL" STA 148+60.04 2.50' LT 824.46 FS "CON. CL" STA 148+60.00 7.00' LT 824.53 FS 825.53 TC "CON. CL" STA 148+40.00 7.00' LT 824.26 FS 825.26 TC BEG SW "CON. CL" STA 148+24.72 7.00' LT 824.06 FS 825.06 TC END SW, BEG TRANS. "CON. CL" STA 148+75.28 7.00' LT 824.73 FS 1' CF 825.73 TC END TRANS., END CURB "CON. CL" STA 148+92.63 6.00' LT 825.03 FS 0" CF "CON. CL" STA 148+91.96 6.00' RT 824.75 FS "CON. CL" STA 149+39.32 6.00' LT 830.26 FS "D" STA 12+94.22 50.00' LT 829.94 FS "CON. CL" STA 148+75.28 7.00' RT 824.42 FS

9.5'
14' BIKEPATH "CON. CL" STA 149+46.62 17.43' RT, END FENCE MAX
2:1
2:1
MAX
10'

2.5' 7.0'

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
831
8''W 8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W 8''W 8''W

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH VV WM 8.1% 8.1% 0.3% 1.8%

0.2%
(2.7%)

0.2% (2.9%) (0.5%) 0.7% 1.7% 2.8% 2.5%

10.0% 10.0%

3.0%

4.8%

1.3%

3.9%

4.8%

4.6%
13'
16' DWY 4.3' 4' 1.2' 5.8' 6.2' 5.2'

6.1'

3.3'

5.1' 6'
7'

3.4'

4.5'

4.7'

R/W R/W

LACFCD R/W

0.2% 4'
DUDLEY ST "D" STA 12+89.00 37.70' RT (830.82 BW) "D" STA 12+91.45 40.00' RT 830.66 BW END DWY "D" STA 13+16.70 31.70' RT 830.53 TC 830.03 FL "D" STA 13+12.00 30.50' RT 830.09 LIP "D" STA 13+12.00 31.70' RT 830.06 FL, 0" CF "D" STA 12+96.00 31.70' RT 830.09 FL, 0" CF "D" STA 12+96.00 30.50' RT 830.11 LIP "D" STA 12+96.00 24.70' RT (830.15 FS) "D" STA 13+12.00 24.70' RT (830.25 FS) "D" STA 12+89.00 24.70' RT (830.15 FS) "D" STA 12+89.00 30.50' RT (830.11 LIP) "D" STA 13+21.20 24.70' RT (830.23 FS) "D" STA 13+21.20 30.50' RT (830.14 LIP) (830.10 FL) END SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "D" STA 13+21.20 31.70' RT (830.69 TC) (830.02 FL) END CURB "D" STA 13+21.20 37.90' RT (830.87 BW), 0" CF BEG CURB, AC "D" STA 12+96.00 40.00' RT 830.45 BW, 0" CF BEG CURB, AC, JOIN EX. "D" STA 13+09.91 45.00' RT, JOIN EX (830.60 FS) (831.18 TC) END CURB, AC, JOIN EX. "D" STA 12+96.90 45.00' RT, JOIN EX (830.25 FS) (830.85 TC) "D" STA 13+12.00 36.00' RT 830.41 FS END AC "D" STA 13+13.41 40.00' RT 830.52 FS (830.90 TC) "D" STA 13+16.01 37.90' RT 830.62 FS (830.85 TC) "D" STA 13+12.00 40.00' RT 830.48 BW "D" STA 12+96.00 36.00' RT 830.44 FS BEG SW, C&G, DWY, JOIN EX. "D" STA 12+89.00 31.70' RT (830.79 TC) 2:1 MAX 2:1 MAX
830
829 Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 ACCESS AREA AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL - DUDLEY STREET (NW) 22 SCALE: 1" = 5' DRIVEWAY DETAIL - DUDLEY STREET (NE) 23 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 40 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.5.2024 C211 FA-2263 BN 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W
8''W
8''W
8''W 8''W OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH PPPP 720089E WVWV WVWV FH FH PPPP 2270710E WM 151+00 DUDLEY ST 7.9% 1.7% 7.9% 1.7% 7.9% 1.8% (0.7%) (4.3%) 3.8% 4.1% 1.7% 5.0%

4.9%

2.9%

3.0% 0.9% 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.8%

16.6%0.8%

9.5%

0.4% 0.3% 5.8' 1.2'

3.5'
10' DWY 12' DWY

5.5' 4.3' 4' 4.5'
7' 5.9' 2.3'

4.5'

5.3' 6'
R/W R/W CON. CL LACFCD R/W

0.3%

0.3%

0.4%

0.4%

0.5% 9'

10.7' 0.1%

3.2%

0.2%

0.3% 0.5% 5' R43.5' R2' R150' R1'

4.5'

5.5' 12.7' 12' BIKEPATH "D" STA 12+02.00 24.70' RT (829.86 FS) "D" STA 12+02.00 30.50' RT (829.77 LIP) (829.69 FL) "D" STA 12+47.30 24.70' RT (830.06 FS) "D" STA 12+47.30 30.50' RT (830.01 LIP) "D" STA 12+02.00 37.70' RT (830.62 BW), 0" CF "D" STA 12+06.50 37.70' RT 830.40 FS (830.70 TC) "D" STA 12+06.50 45.00' RT (830.69 FS), 0" CF "D" STA 12+12.50 40.00' RT 830.25 BW (830.02 FL) "D" STA 12+47.30 37.60' RT (830.66 BW) "D" STA 12+40.26 37.60' RT 830.45 BW "D" STA 12+36.47 40.00' RT 830.32 BW "D" STA 12+34.50 40.00' RT 830.33 BW "D" STA 12+22.50 40.00' RT 830.29 BW "D" STA 12+22.50 45.00' RT 831.00 TC 830.50 FS "D" STA 12+11.80 45.00' RT (830.44 FS) "D" STA 12+34.50 36.00' RT 830.26 FS "D" STA 12+34.50 31.70' RT 829.92 FL, 0" CF END DWY "D" STA 12+40.00 31.70' RT 830.44 TC 829.94 FL "D" STA 12+12.50 31.70' RT 829.84 FL, 0" CF BEG DWY "D" STA 12+09.00 31.70' RT 830.42 TC 829.75 FL "D" STA 12+34.50 30.50' RT 829.93 LIP "D" STA 12+12.50 30.50' RT 829.85 LIP "D" STA 12+22.50 31.70' RT 829.88 FL, 0" CF "D" STA 12+22.50 30.50' RT 829.88 LIP "D" STA 12+11.80 54.00' RT (830.43 FS) "D" STA 12+34.50 24.70' RT (829.96 FS) "D" STA 12+22.50 24.70' RT (829.89 FS) "D" STA 12+12.50 24.70' RT (829.90 FS) END CURB "D" STA 12+22.50 54.00' RT (830.45 FS), 0" CF "D" STA 12+06.50 40.00' RT 830.44 FS (830.71 TC) "CON. CL" STA 150+61.22 6.50' RT 831.00 TC 830.50 FS "CON. CL" STA 150+83.71 6.50' RT 828.61 FS 829.11 TC "CON. CL" STA 150+89.90 6.50' RT 828.09 FS 828.59 TC END 6" CURB "CON. CL" STA 150+95.27 6.02' RT 827.83 FS 828.33 TC "CON. CL" STA 150+92.95 6.46' LT 827.58 FS BEG 8" CURB "CON. CL" STA 151+15.60 4.62' RT 827.89 FS 828.56 TC "CON. CL" STA 151+03.48 3.76' RT 827.75 FS "CON. CL" STA 151+02.27 3.82' RT 827.74 FS "CON. CL" STA 151+26.94 4.53' RT 828.01 FS 828.68 TC "CON. CL" STA 150+67.53 18.73' LT, BEG FENCE END SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "D" STA 12+47.30 31.70' RT (830.70 TC), BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "D" STA 12+02.00 31.70' RT (830.36 TC), "D" STA 12+22.50 36.00' RT 830.22 FS R51.6' 828 828 829 830 MAX 2:1 828 828 829 830 831 831

4.5'

3.7'

1.3' 5.5' 6.5' OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH GA PPPP 4173964E 152+00 LACFCD R/W R20' R20'
R20'
R20' CON. CL "CON. CL" STA 151+64.59 4.50' RT 828.41 FS 829.08 TC "CON. CL" STA 151+69.52 3.88' RT 828.46 FS 829.13 TC "CON. CL" STA 151+74.49 2.62' RT 828.49 FS 829.16 TC "CON. CL" STA 151+78.76 2.01' RT 828.53 FS 829.20 TC "CON. CL" STA 151+94.85 2.00' RT 828.62 FS 829.29 TC "CON. CL" STA 152+04.82 4.33' RT 828.71 FS 829.38 TC "CON. CL" STA 152+11.57 5.50' RT 828.77 FS 829.44 TC "CON. CL" STA 151+79.14 5.50' LT 828.38 FS

7.5' 829

0.9'

5.5' 2.0' "CON. CL" STA 152+02.57 3.52' RT 828.69 FS 829.32 TC

0.7' OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH PPOH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH PP 4455882E SIGNSIGN 153+00 11'
13'

BIKEPATH

1.1' 25' TRANSITIONCON. CL END 8" CURB "CON. CL" STA 152+69.96 5.50' RT 828.92 FS 829.59 TC "CON. CL" STA 153+25.00 5.50' RT 830.28 FS "CON. CL" STA 153+25.00 5.50' LT 830.07 FS "CON. CL" STA 153+50.00 6.50' RT 831.18 FS "CON. CL" STA 153+50.00 6.50' LT 830.94 FS LACFCD R/W 830 831 829 831 830 829 828 830 829 Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 DUDLEY STREET (SE) DRIVEWAY DETAIL AND BIKE PATH NEAR UTILITIES 24 SCALE: 1" = 5' 41 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.5.2024 C212 FA-2263 BO BIKE PATH NEAR UTILITY NEAR STA 153+40 25 SCALE: 1" = 5' 940+00 162+00 163+00
WEBER ST LACFCD R/W 8.0% 0.6% 8.0% 0.6%

2.1% 4.0%1.0% 0.7%0.0% 1.3% 1.3% 1.4%

4.7% (4.8%) (2.2%) 3.7% 0.3% 6' 7.9'

2.3' 2.5' 16.1' DWY 7.7' 5.5' 5' 6.5'

1.4' 4.8' 1.5' 2'

4.1' 2.5' 18.1'
R/W CON. CL

WEBER ST

4.5'
SIDE
WALK
13'

BIKEPATH
R1006.5'
R393.5'
R993.5'
R406.5' (840.85 FL) BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "W" STA 11+32.65 17.60' RT (841.51 TC) "W" STA 11+32.65 14.10' RT (840.88 FS) "W" STA 11+32.65 16.10' RT (840.86 LIP) "W" STA 11+51.48 24.24' RT 841.12 FS "W" STA 11+53.45 29.42' RT 841.06 BW "W" STA 11+58.65 23.69' RT (841.04 BW) "W" STA 11+51.00 29.21' RT 841.15 BW "W" STA 11+40.66 29.09' RT 841.38 BW "W" STA 11+38.32 29.10' RT 841.43 BW "W" STA 11+40.66 24.09' RT 841.35 FS "W" STA 11+52.12 17.77' RT 840.60 FL, 0" CF 840.47 FL "W" STA 11+52.26 16.28' RT 840.66 LIP END DWY "W" STA 11+56.90, EC 18.10' RT 840.97 TC 840.84 FL BEG DWY "W" STA 11+35.15 17.60' RT 841.38 TC "W" STA 11+40.65 17.59' RT 840.83 FL 0" CF "W" STA 11+40.65 16.09' RT 840.84 LIP "W" STA 11+32.65 23.60' RT (841.80 BW) 840.83 FL "W" STA 11+39.21, BC 17.60' RT 840.97 TC (840.44 FL) END SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "W" STA 11+58.90 18.19' RT (840.92 TC) "W" STA 11+58.97 16.69' RT (840.55 LIP) "W" STA 11+59.05 14.69' RT (840.55 FS) "W" STA 11+33.59 16.10' LT 840.86 LIP "W" STA 11+33.59 10.50' LT (840.86 FS) "W" STA 11+58.25 10.47' LT (840.55 FS) "W" STA 11+58.56 16.06' LT (840.53 LIP) BEG DWY, SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "W" STA 11+58.64 17.46' LT (840.96 TC) (840.47 FL) (840.86 FL) "W" STA 11+54.50 16.37' LT 840.60 LIP "W" STA 11+53.90 10.81' LT (840.63 FS) "W" STA 11+54.65 17.76' LT 840.59 FL, 0" CF "W" STA 11+33.59 17.50' LT 840.86 FL, 0" CF "W" STA 11+30.50 10.50' LT (840.94 FS) "W" STA 11+30.08 16.11' LT (840.86 LIP) BEG SW "CON. CL" STA 161+69.88 6.50' RT 837.37 FS "CON. CL" STA 161+84.83 11.00' RT 837.55 FS "CON. CL" STA 162+05.06 11.00' RT 837.72 FS END SW "CON. CL" STA 162+20.24 6.50' RT 837.98 FS "CON. CL" STA 162+58.28 6.50' RT 839.30 FS "CON. CL" STA 162+58.28 6.50' LT 838.98 FS "CON. CL" STA 161+82.21 6.50' LT 837.27 FS "CON. CL" STA 161+82.21 6.50' RT 837.46 FS "CON. CL" STA 162+94.65 14.50' LT, END FENCE 15' 10' 15.1' 10' 13'

BIKEPATH

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%
MAX
2:1 LACFCD R/W 838 839 840
841
841 838 839 840 841 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W 6''W OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 164+00 WEBER ST 8.3%8.3% 2.0% 0.0% (2.2%) 6.4% 1.4% 0.9% (2.9%) 18.9%

9.2% 0.5% 0.7%

1.7%

1.8%

1.9% 6' 4' 4' 4' 6' 1.4' 5.6' 6.5' 3.5'

3.5'
4'

16.2' DWY 3.7'

14.6'

15.2' 2.0% R/W LACFCD R/W R/W LACFCD R/W CON. CL WEBER ST

11.5'

BIKEPATH
R2007'
R1993'
14'
BIKEPATH "W" STA 11+58.97 16.69' RT "W" STA 11+59.05 14.69' RT (840.55 FS) "W" STA 11+33.59 16.10' LT 840.86 LIP "W" STA 11+33.59 10.50' LT (840.86 FS) "W" STA 11+58.25 10.47' LT (840.55 FS) "W" STA 11+58.56 16.06' LT (840.53 LIP) BEG DWY, SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "W" STA 11+58.64 17.46' LT (840.96 TC) (840.47 FL) END DWY, SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "W" STA 11+29.84 17.50' LT (841.57 TC) (840.86 FL) "W" STA 11+54.50 16.37' LT 840.60 LIP "W" STA 11+53.90 10.81' LT (840.63 FS) "W" STA 11+54.65 17.76' LT 840.59 FL, 0" CF "W" STA 11+33.59 17.50' LT 840.86 FL, 0" CF "W" STA 11+33.59 27.50' LT 841.44 BW "W" STA 11+55.73 27.71' LT 841.17 BW "W" STA 11+29.54 27.50' LT 841.70 BW "W" STA 11+59.19 27.44' LT 841.20 BW "W" STA 11+59.00 23.95' LT (841.15 BW) "W" STA 11+29.54 23.50' LT, JOIN EX (841.70 FS) "W" STA 11+33.59 23.50' LT 841.36 FS "W" STA 11+55.30 23.73' LT 841.09 FS "W" STA 11+30.50 10.50' LT (840.94 FS) "W" STA 11+30.08 16.11' LT (840.86 LIP) BEG CURB, SW "CON. CL" STA 163+92.31 7.00' RT 839.65 FS 840.65 TC "CON. CL" STA 164+07.35 9.00' RT 839.70 FS 840.70 TC "CON. CL" STA 164+27.44 9.00' RT 839.87 FS 840.87 TC END CURB, SW "CON. CL" STA 164+42.49 7.00' RT 839.97 FS 840.97 TC "CON. CL" STA 164+07.39 4.50' RT 839.63 FS "CON. CL" STA 164+27.44 4.50' RT 839.80 FS "CON. CL" STA 163+62.82 7.00' LT 840.39 FS "CON. CL" STA 163+62.82 7.00' RT 840.72 FS 14' 10'
BIKEPATH 15' 15'

4.5'
SIDE
WALK "CON. CL" STA 163+43.32 12.72' LT, BEG FENCE

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%
2:1
MAX
7' 4.5'
841 841
840 840 841 840 840 10' Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 ACCESS AREA AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL - WEBER STREET (SE) 27 SCALE: 1" = 5' ACCESS AREA AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL - WEBER STREET (SW) 26 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 42 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 C213 FA-2263 BP 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 178+00 LACFCD R/W CON. CL "CON. CL" STA 177+94.36 7.00' RT 852.81 FS "CON. CL" STA 178+26.36 7.00' RT 853.18 FS 8% MAX
2'
CLEVELAND ST "CON. CL" STA 178+04.36 17.00' RT MATCH EX. "CON. CL" STA 178+16.36 17.00' RT MATCH EX. JOIN EX. SW "CON. CL" STA 178+16.36 19.02' RT

1.31' 12' 32' LACFCD R/W 12.06' 1.5% MAX 1.0% JOIN EX. SW "CON. CL" STA 178+04.36 18.31' RT R10' R10' 14'
BIKEPATH BEG REMOVE FENCE, JOIN EX. "CON. CL" STA 178+02.76 11.59' RT END REMOVE FENCE, JOIN EX. "CON. CL" STA 178+18.01 11.54' RT

1.5%

1.5%
R/W
R/W 853 853 853 854 854
14'
BIKEPATH Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 CLEVELAND STREET CONNECTION 28 SCALE: 1" = 5' SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 43 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.3.2024 C214 FA-2263 BQ 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH PPPP 1417847E 963+80 48+00 185+77 185+00 MURCHISON AVE CON. CL CITY R/W 7.9%7.9% 1.8% 1.7% (1.6%) 1.6% (1.8%) 3.0% 1.3% 0.9% 0.4% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 9.0% 9.8% 1.1% 6.7' 5' 4.5' 1.7' 16' DWY 5.7'5' 7' 4' 1.7' 6.1' 6.7' 3' 2' 2' 1.5% 1.1% R10' 1.5% R20' R60' R17' R22' R57' R43' 14'

BIKEPATH
R24.5' LACFCD R/W "M" CITY R/W (863.83 FL) END SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "M" STA 47+74.74 18.30' RT (864.43 TC) "M" STA 47+74.74 16.30' RT (863.88 LIP) "M" STA 47+74.74 14.30' RT (863.96 FS) BEG SW, C&G, JOIN EX. "M" STA 47+38.74 18.30' RT (863.98 TC) (863.34 FL) "M" STA 47+38.74 14.30' RT (863.52 FS) "M" STA 47+38.74 16.30' RT (863.44 LIP) "M" STA 47+43.74 25.00' RT 864.11 BW "M" STA 47+71.74 25.00' RT 864.51 BW "M" STA 47+74.74 25.00' RT (864.55 BW) "M" STA 47+47.04 28.00' RT 864.07 BW "M" STA 47+48.74 28.00' RT 864.04 BW "M" STA 47+66.44 28.00' RT 864.33 BW "M" STA 47+64.74 28.00' RT 864.30 BW 863.81 FL END DWY "M" STA 47+71.74 18.30' RT 864.41 TC 863.41 FL "M" STA 47+64.74 18.30' RT 863.78 FL, 0" CF BEG DWY "M" STA 47+43.74 18.30' RT 864.01 TC "M" STA 47+48.74 18.30' RT 863.52 FL, 0" CF "M" STA 47+48.74 16.30' RT 863.54 LIP "M" STA 47+64.74 16.30' RT 863.80 LIP "M" STA 47+64.74 14.30' RT (863.83 FS) "M" STA 47+48.74 14.30' RT (863.57 FS)"M" STA 47+48.74 24.00' RT 863.97 FS "M" STA 47+64.74 24.00' RT 864.23 FS "M" STA 48+35.63 27.18' RT 865.05 FS "M" STA 48+15.36 38.58' RT 864.86 FS "M" STA 47+98.09 48.30' RT 864.76 FS "M" STA 48+04.56 37.78' RT 864.87 FS "M" STA 47+93.52 39.74' RT 864.81 FS "M" STA 47+43.84 49.17' RT 863.84 FS "M" STA 47+41.21 47.12' RT 863.86 FS "M" STA 47+33.55 33.45' RT 863.94 FS "M" STA 47+23.70 25.00' RT (863.81 BW) "M" STA 47+79.52 26.13' RT 864.59 FS "M" STA 47+33.70 34.41' RT 863.93 FS "M" STA 48+27.27 25.00' RT (864.99 BW) "M" STA 48+12.42 33.35' RT 864.91 FS "M" STA 47+56.70 54.88' RT 864.11 FS "M" STA 47+59.93 55.36' RT 864.17 FS "M" STA 47+38.74 25.00' RT (864.09 BW) "M" STA 48+35.63 18.60' RT (864.92 TC) "M" STA 48+46.28 18.60' RT (865.02 TC) "M" STA 48+65.04 27.33' RT (865.34 TC) "M" STA 48+63.55 32.56' RT (865.43 BW) "M" STA 48+63.25 32.20' RT (865.43 BW) "M" STA 47+79.31 25.00' RT (864.59 BW) END SW, JOIN EX. "M" STA 48+67.00 29.66' RT (865.35 TC) "CON. CL" STA 184+87.93 7.00' RT 861.58 FS "CON. CL" STA 184+87.93 7.00' LT 861.25 FS BEG SW "M" STA 48+27.27 18.60' RT (864.83 TC) "M" STA 47+63.74 28.00' RT 864.28 BW "M" STA 47+49.74 28.00' RT 864.06 BW "M" STA 47+23.66 35.80' RT, END FENCE 14' BIKEPATH 1.5% 1.5% 861 862 863 864 861 862
863 864 865
865 184+00 LACFCD R/W CON. CL

4.5'
SIDE
WALK 13.3' 15.1' 10.5'
14'
BIKEPATH 1.5' LACFCD R/W BEG SW "CON. CL" STA 183+97.00 7.00' RT 858.38 FS "CON. CL" STA 184+11.93 11.50' RT 858.64 FS END SW "CON. CL" STA 184+47.53 7.00' RT 859.06 FS "CON. CL" STA 184+32.12 11.50' RT 858.88 FS 9.5'

1.5%

1.5%859 859 859 859 860 Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 5 0 5 10 ACCESS AREA AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL - MURCHISON AVENUE 29 SCALE: 1" = 5' 44 DETAIL SHEETS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.18.2024 C215 FA-2263 BR TS TSNOSIGN SN SIGN SN TRD 8" TRD 6"
TRD 24" TRD 8"
TS
TSL
POSTGDP 6" POSTGDP 6"
MW ER ERSR 1.5" ER ERSR 2"
POSTGRP 6" POSTGRP 6"

W TEMPLE AVE S CAMPUS DR SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / WLACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 13' R / W
R / W
R / W 1 660 LF
100' CON. CL
2'
2'
9' 9+72 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 10+24.36 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 2 660 LF 2 660 LF

4.5'

4.5' R1-1 3 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2 3 5 105 LF

4.5'

4.5'
2'
9'
13' 4 3 SGV 3 CITY R / W CPP R / W CPP R / W CPP R / W CPP R / W D11-1, D1-1 3 3 M6-1R (CA) 3 M6-1L (CA) 2 105 LF 2 105 LF 11+29.46 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 11+39.95 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 3 OM3-L 3 OM3-R TRD 30" TRD 30" SIGN SNICV ICV TS TSL TS TSNO WV WV TS TSL TS TSNO ICV S SMH LID SIGN SN TRD 30" SD CBMH LID WV WV
WV WV
WV WV

SIGN SIGN
WV WV LP SL KELLOGG DR S CAMPUS DRSAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 512 LF 1 100' 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 23+72.62 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 573 LF 2 2 573 LF 26+93.59 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 63 LF 5 2 108 LF 107 LF 2 2'
9'
2' CON. CL
13' 100' SEE SHEETS T102, T110, & T111 FOR CROSSING DETAILS.

4.5'

4.5' 3 R44 (CA) 3 W5-4A 67 LF 5 SGV 1, SGV 23 R44 (CA) 3

0.5'

0.5' 3 SGV 1, SGV 2
5'
10'
1'
1'
5' CPP R / W
5' CPP R / W CPP R / W
100' M6-1L (CA) 3 3 M6-1R (CA)
6'

0.5'
6' 45 LF 1
12'
11'
11'
13' 1' 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 PLAN PLAN MATCH LINE = STA 18+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT MATCH LINE = STA 28+00 - SEE SHT SS101 MATCH LINE = STA 18+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1SIGN LEGEND INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 5 BIKE PATH NO MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTORIZED BICYCLES R1-1 18" X 18" R44A (CA) 12" X 24" SGV 1 SGV 2 SGV 3 18" X18" SYMBOL LEGEND PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED W5-4A 18" X18" 6 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. Student Center D11-1 24" X18" D1-1 36" X 6" M6-1L(CA) 12" X 9" M6-1R(CA) 12" X 9" OM3-L OM3-R PROPOSED SIGNS - DOUBLE SIDED 45 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS100 FA-2263 BS SIGN SN SIGN SN S CAMPUS DR SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 144 LF 1 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 252 LF 2 252 LF 2 30+53.56 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 30+71.00 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 100' 529 LF 2 529 LF 2430 LF 1 100' CON. CL 4.5' 4.5' 9' 13' 2' 2' 107 LF 5 3 R44A (CA) 5 107 LF 13'

1.5' 1.5'
10'

4.5'

4.5' W5-4A 3 SGV 3 3 LACFCD R / W CPP R / W CPP R / W CPP R / W CPP R / W 100'

5.5'

5.5'
1'
11'
9'

4.5'
1'

4.5'
1'
13' POSTGRP 4" POSTGRP 4" S CAMPUS DR SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 900 LF LACFCD R / W 2 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 100' 900 LF 2 900 LF 1 100' 100' CON. CL

4.5' 4.5'
9'
13'
2'
2' 3 OM3-R 13' 2' 4.5'

4.5' 9'
2' SGV 3 3 3 OM3-L 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 36+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT MATCH LINE = STA 45+00 - SEE SHT SS102
MATCH LINE = STA 36+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT PLAN PLAN 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' MATCH LINE = STA 28+00 - SEE SHT SS100 SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES SIGN LEGEND SYMBOL LEGEND PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED BIKE PATH NO MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTORIZED BICYCLES R44A (CA) 12" X 24" SGV 3 18" X18" INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 5 W5-4A 18" X18" 6 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. OM3-L 6" X 18" OM3-R 6" X 18" 46 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS101 FA-2263 BT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF POMONA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF POMONA S CAMPUS DR KELLOGG PARK SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 100' 900 LF 2 900 LF 2 900 LF 1 2' 2' 9' 13' 100' 100' CON. CL 4.5' 4.5' 4.5'

4.5' 9' 13' 2' 2' 4.5'
13'
2'
9'

4.5'

4.5' 2' 2' 5' 3 SGV 3 13' CPP R / W 3 OM3-R3 OM3-L POSTGDP 4" POSTGDP 4" POSTGDP 4" POSTGDP 8" POSTGDP 8" TRD 15" MULTI BRANCH
TRD 30" POSTGRP 8" POSTGRP 8" S SMH LID CITY OF POMONA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF POMONA 57 - ORANGE FWY SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 59+00 60+00 61+00 62+00 63+00 900 LF 2 900 LF 1 100'
86'
100' CON. CL APPROXIMATE FREEWAY LIMITS 900 LF 2
13'
2'
2' 9'

4.5' 4.5'
13'
2' 2'

4.5'
9'

4.5' 3 SGV 3 LACFCD R / W CPP R / W LACFCD R / W CALTRANS R/W CALTRANS R/W 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 54+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE = STA 63+00 - SEE SHT SS103 MATCH LINE = STA 54+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT PLAN PLAN MATCH LINE = STA 45+00 - SEE SHT SS101 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 5SIGN LEGEND SYMBOL LEGEND SGV 3 18" X18" PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED 6 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. OM3-L 6" X 18" OM3-R 6" X 18" 47 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS102 FA-2263 BU S SMH LID GA TRD 24"
TS
TSSL
TRD 18" S SMH LID SIGN SN TS TSSL TRD 18" LP SL VV VAULT VENT D=1.5 SD CB MH LID ICV TS
TSSLWV WMWV WM WV WM S SMH LID LP SL ICV ICV SD SDMH LID WV WV WV WV WV WV SIGN SN SIGN SN FH FH SD CB MH LID TRD 24" TS TS SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 63+00 64+00 65+00 66+00 67+00 68+00 69+00 70+00 71+00 72+00 86' 629 LF 1 692 LF 2 900 LF 2 72' 86' CON. CL SEE SHEET T103 & T112 FOR CROSSING DETAILS. 13' 2' 2' 4.5' 4.5' 9' R44A(CA) 3 3 SGV 1, SGV 2 4 SGV 3 3 69+91.67 "CON. CL" END WHITE STRIPE, LT 70+04.06 "CON. CL" BEG WHITE STRIPE, LT 196 LF 2 5 271 LF 4'
4'
8' W5-4A 3 3 R1-1 R / W R / W
10'
1'
1'
4'
4'
8' OM3-R 3OM3-L 3 OM3-R 3 OM3-L 3
10'
1'
1' SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / WLACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 72+00 73+00 74+00 75+00 76+00 77+00 78+00 79+00 80+00 81+00 72'
75' 531 LF 1 900 LF 2 900 LF 2
2'
2'
9'
13' CON. CL

4.5'

4.5'
9' 2'

4.5'
13'

4.5' 50 LF 5
2' 318 LF 1
9'

0.5' 0.5'

4.25'

4.25' 3 W5-4A W5-4A 3 W5-4A 3 OM3-R 3 OM3-L 3 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 72+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE = STA 81+00 - SEE SHT SS104 PLAN
MATCH LINE = STA 72+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT PLAN MATCH LINE = STA 63+00 - SEE SHT SS102 CORPORATE CENTER DR 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES SIGN LEGEND BIKE PATH NO MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTORIZED BICYCLES R1-1 18" X 18" R44A (CA) 12" X 24" SGV 1 SGV 2 SGV 3 18" X18" SYMBOL LEGEND PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED W5-4A 18" X18" INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 56 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. OM3-L 6" X 18" OM3-R 6" X 18" 48 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS103 FA-2263 BV TRD 27"
TRD 12"
TRD 10" GA GA GA 36" TRD S SMH LID 36" TRD
71 - CHINO VALLEY FWY SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00 95+00 96+00 97+00 98+00 99+00 100+00 CON. CL 100'
100' 900 LF 1 400 LF 2 400 LF 2 96+00.00 "CON. CL" BEG WHITE STRIPE, LT & RT 14'
2'
10'
5'
5' 2' 3 W34A(CA) 3 W87(CA)
6'
6'
12' 90+28.57 "CON. CL" WV WV SIGN SIGN SIGN SIGN PP PPWC 1780519E GA GA ER ERSR 2" WM WM WV WV WV WV S SMH LID S SMH LID PP PP 1525002E GA GA RIDGEWAY ST SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W R / W R / W R / W
R / W 89+30 90+00 91+00 81+00 82+00 83+00 84+00 85+00 86+00 87+00 88+00 88+96 555 LF 1 555 LF 2 555 LF 2 88+62.48 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 89+62.50 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 52 LF 1 42 LF 2 10' 2' 14' 2'
13'
9'
2' CON. CL CON. CL 100' SEE SHEETS T104 & T113 FOR CROSSING DETAILS. 90+90.00 "CON. CL" END WHITE STRIPE, LT & RT

4.5'

4.5' 5'5' 50 LF 54 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 23 5 66 LF 4 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 23 W34A(CA) 3 R1-1 3 3 R1-13 W87(CA) 3 SGV 3 6' 6' SGV 3 3 M6-1L (CA) 3 M6-1R (CA) 3 132 LF 1 188 LF 2 188 LF 2 86+55.21 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 86+75.17 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 2' 90+28.57 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 90+48.61 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING42 LF 2 67 LF 2 67 LF 2 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 91+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE = STA 100+00 - SEE SHT SS105
MATCH LINE = STA 91+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT PLAN PLAN
MATCH LINE = STA 81+00 - SEE SHT SS103 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 5SIGN LEGEND SYMBOL LEGEND PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED BIKE PATH NO MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTORIZED BICYCLES R1-1 18" X 18" R44A (CA) 12" X 24" SGV 1 SGV 2 SGV 3 18" X18" W87 (CA) 18" X 18" W34A (CA) (10' 0") 36" X 54" 6 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. M6-1L(CA) 12" X 9" M6-1R(CA) 12" X 9" 49 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS104 FA-2263 BW

GA GA GA GAGA GA GA SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

LACFCD R / W

LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W
LACFCD R / W 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 100' CON. CL 900 LF 1 900 LF 2 900 LF 2 100' 100' 14' 2' 10' 14' 2' 2' 5' 5'
14'
2'
10'
2'
5'
5' SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL GA LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 118+00 CON. CL 900 LF 1 900 LF 2 900 LF 2 100'
100'
14'
2' 2'
10'
5'
5'
14'
5'
5'
2'
2'
10' SGV 3 3 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MATCH LINE = STA 109+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE = STA 118+00 - SEE SHT SS106 MATCH LINE = STA 109+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT PLAN PLAN MATCH LINE = STA 100+00 - SEE SHT SS104 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 5SIGN LEGEND SYMBOL LEGEND SGV 3 18" X18" PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED 6 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. 50 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS105 FA-2263 BX ER ERSR 1" PP PP 2079687E GA GA SIGN SIGN S SMH LID WV WV WV WV PP PP 1100721E GA SIGN SIGN ER ERSR 2" ER ERSR 1" ER TRD 48" TRD 48" TRD 60" TRD 12" MB TRD 24" TRD 36" POSTPOST 1.5" FAIRPLEX DR JOHN F. KENNEDY PARK JOHN MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W R / W R / W R / W R / W 119+80120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 125+00 126+00 118+00 119+00 119+77 119+35.20 "CON. CL" END STRIPING CON. CL 475 LF 1 475 LF 2 475 LF 2 120+20.80 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 100'
70'

1.5'

1.5'
10' SEE SHEETS T105 & T114 FOR CROSSING DETAILS.
5'
5' 2 96 LF 1 39 LF 2'
10'
5'
5'2' 57 LF 5 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 23 R1-1 3 3 R1-1 4 4 5 50 LF 14' SGV 3 3 2 96 LF 3 M6-1L (CA) 3 M6-1R (CA) 2 18 LF 2 18 LF 118+17.89 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 118+37.89 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 1 18 LF 121+05.59 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 121+25.62 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 3 M6-1R (CA) 3 M6-1L (CA) 1 25 LF 2 75 LF 75 LF 2 13' TRD 5' TRD 28" TRD 24" TRD 27" TRD 27" JOHN F. KENNEDY PARK JOHN MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00 130+00 131+00 132+00 133+00 134+00 135+00 CON. CL 868 LF 1 868 LF 2 868 LF 2 10'
2'

1.5'

1.5'
13'
14'
2'
70'
5'
70'
5'
5'
5'
14'
5'
10'
5'
2'
2' 12 LF 1 12 LF 2 12 LF 2 M6-1R (CA) 3 M6-1L (CA) 3 134+68.67 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 134+88.67 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING ER ERSR 1" PP PP 2079687E GA GA SIGN SIGN S SMH LID WV WV WV WV PP PP 1100721E GA SIGN SIGN ER ERSR 2" ER ERSR 1" ER TRD 48" TRD 48" TRD 60" TRD 12" MB TRD 24" TRD 36" POSTPOST 1.5" FAIRPLEX DR JOHN F. KENNEDY PARK JOHN MARSHALL MIDDLE SCHOOL SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W R / W R / W R / W R / W 119+80120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 125+00 126+00 118+00 119+00 119+77 119+35.20 "CON. CL" END STRIPING CON. CL 475 LF 1 475 LF 2 475 LF 2 120+20.80 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 100'
70'

1.5'

1.5'
10' SEE SHEETS T105 & T114 FOR CROSSING DETAILS.
5'
5' 2 96 LF 1 39 LF 2'
10'
5'
5'2' 57 LF 5 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2 3 R1-1 3 3 R1-1 4 4 5 50 LF 14' SGV 3 3 2 96 LF 3 M6-1L (CA) 3 M6-1R (CA) 2 18 LF 2 18 LF 118+17.89 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 118+37.89 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 1 18 LF 121+05.59 "CON. CL" END STRIPING121+25.62 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 3 M6-1R (CA) 3 M6-1L (CA) 1 25 LF 2 75 LF 75 LF 2 13' 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 PLAN PLAN MATCH LINE = STA 126+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE = STA 126+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE = STA 135+00 - SEE SHT SS107
MATCH LINE = STA 118+00 - SEE SHT SS105 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES SIGN LEGEND SYMBOL LEGEND PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 5 BIKE PATH NO MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTORIZED BICYCLES R1-1 18" X 18" R44A (CA) 12" X 24" SGV 1 SGV 2 SGV 3 18" X18" 6 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. M6-1L(CA) 12" X 9" M6-1R(CA) 12" X 9" 51 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS106 FA-2263 BY WV WV WV WV FH FH WV WV COCO TRD 36" PP PP G14869Y POSTWITNESS POST 2" WM GLEN AVE ARROYO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W R / W R / W R / W R / W 135+00 136+00 137+00 138+00 139+00 140+00 141+00 142+00 143+00 144+00 136+13.39 "CON. CL" END STRIPING CON. CL 610 LF 1 610 LF 2 610 LF 2 136+73.21 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 70' 70' 2' 10' SEE SHEETS T107 & T115 FOR CROSSING DETAILS. 5' 5' 2 113 LF 1 63 LF 10' 2' 14' 2' 5'5' 4 R1-1 3 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2 3 50 LF 5 43 R1-1 3 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2 5 50 LF 5' 5'
10'
2' 2 113 LF 3 SGV 3 12 LF 2 3 137+71.10 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 137+90.96 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 3 M6-1R (CA) 3 M6-1L (CA) 38 LF 1 2 88 LF 88 LF 2 14' 2' 2' 14' GV GV WV WV WV WV LP SL PP PP 982351E S SMH LID PP PP 982354E WM V WM GA PP PP 4173964E PP PP 720089E S SMH LID WV WV WV WV WV WV FH FH PP PP 2270710E WM PP PP 2270711E

N DUDLEY ST

CAMBRIN

RD SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL

LACFCD R / W

LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W

LACFCD R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W 150+20 151+00 152+00 153+00 144+00 145+00 146+00 147+00 148+00 149+00 149+90 70' CON. CL 440 LF 1 425 LF 2 440 LF 2 149+50.30 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 2' 2' 10' 14' 70' 70' SEE SHEETS T106 & T116 FOR CROSSING DETAILS. 148+24.71 "CON. CL" END WHITE STRIPE, LT 5'5' 148+75.28 "CON. CL" BEG WHITE STRIPE, LT 75 LF 2 150+60.29 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 2 240 LF 2 240 LF 50 LF 5 4 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2 3R1-1 3 3 R1-1 4 3 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2 5 240 LF 3 W5-4A 11'

0.5'

0.5'
10' 5' SGV 3 3
10'
9'
6'

3.5' OM3-L 3 3 OM3-R 3 OM3-L 3 OM3-R OM3-L 3 OM3-R 3
3'

0.5'

0.5' M6-1L (CA) 3 M6-1R (CA) 3 148+39.96 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 148+60.04 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 89 LF 2 14' 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 PLAN PLAN MATCH LINE = STA 144+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE = STA 144+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE = STA 153+00 - SEE SHT SS108
MATCH LINE = STA 135+00 - SEE SHT
SS106 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES SIGN LEGEND BIKE PATH NO MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTORIZED BICYCLES R1-1 18" X 18" R44A (CA) 12" X 24" SGV 1 SGV 2 SGV 3 18" X18" SYMBOL LEGEND PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED W5-4A 18" X18" INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 56 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. OM3-L 6" X 18" OM3-R 6" X 18" M6-1L(CA) 12" X 9" M6-1R(CA) 12" X 9" 52 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS107 FA-2263 BZ GA PP PP PP 982152E PP 720984E GA PP PP 720986E PP PP 4455882E SIGN SIGN SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 153+00 154+00 155+00 156+00 157+00 158+00 159+00 LACFCD R / W 160+00 161+00 CON. CL 750 LF 1 800 LF 2 800 LF 2 2'
2'
9'
13'
70'
65'

4.5'

4.5' 3 W5-4A
13'
2'
2'

4.5'
9'

4.5' 5 51 LF 3 OM3-L 3 OM3-R
70'
10'

0.5'

0.5'
5'
5' GA PP PP 395671E PP PP 1395671E S SMH LID PP PP G23588Y GA WM PP PP 1476700E PP PP 4892520E GA

WEBER ST SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W R / W
R / W
R / W R / W 161+00 162+00 163+00 164+00 165+00 166+00 167+00 168+00 169+00 170+00 171+00 CON. CL 672 LF 1 657 LF 2 672 LF 2 163+46.06 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 162+89.04 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 1 139 LF 2 189 LF 70'
10'
2'
2'
14'
2' 2'
9'
70' SEE SHEETS T108 & T117 FOR CROSSING DETAILS.

4.5' 4.5'
5'
5' 2 43 LF 52 LF 5 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2 3 4 R1-1 3 LACFCD R / W 3 R1-1 4 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2 3 5 61 LF 14'
2'
10'
2'
5'
5' 2 189 LF 3 M6-1R3 M6-1L 164+07.35 "CON. CL" END WHITE STRIPE, LT 164+27.44 "CON. CL" BEG WHITE STRIPE, LT 164+07.35 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 164+27.44 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 2 61 LF 163+88.65 "CON. CL" END WHITE STRIPE, RT 164+42.49 "CON. CL" BEG WHITE STRIPE, RT 13' M6-1L (CA) 3 M6-1R (CA) 3 161+84.83 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 162+05.06 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 1 31LF 83 LF 2 83 LF 2 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 PLAN PLAN MATCH LINE = STA 161+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE = STA 161+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE = STA 171+00 - SEE SHT SS109
MATCH LINE = STA 153+00 - SEE SHT SS107 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES SIGN LEGEND BIKE PATH NO MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTORIZED BICYCLES R1-1 18" X 18" R44A (CA) 12" X 24" SGV 1 SGV 2 SYMBOL LEGEND PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED W5-4A 18" X18" INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 56 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. OM3-L 6" X 18" OM3-R 6" X 18" M6-1L(CA) 12" X 9" M6-1R(CA) 12" X 9" 53 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS108 FA-2263 CA CLEVELAND ST SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / WLACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / W 171+00 172+00 173+00 174+00 175+00 176+00 177+00 178+00 179+00 180+00 70' CON. CL 900 LF 1 900 LF 2 900 LF 2
70'
70'
2' 2'
10' 14'
5'
5' R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2 3 3 SGV 3
14'
5'
5'
10'
2'
2'
14'
2'
5'
2'
5' PP PP G18370Y S SMH LID WV WV FH FH S SMH LID LP SL PP PP 2129349E WM PP PP 1417847E GA PP GUY POLE 1525775E MURCHISON AVE CASA VISTA DR SAN JOSE CREEK CHANNEL LACFCD R / W LACFCD R / WLACFCD R / W R / WR / W 180+00 181+00 182+00 183+00 184+00 185+00 185+77 CON. CL 411 LF 2 411 LF 2 185+49.27 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 90'
2'
10'
2'
14' 45'
5'
5' 411 LF 1 50 LF 5 4 3 R1-1 3 R44A(CA), SGV 1, SGV 2
14'
2' 2'
10'
5'
5' SGV 3 3 OM3-R 3 OM3-L 3 M6-1L (CA) 3 M6-1R (CA) 3 184+11.54 "CON. CL" END STRIPING 184+32.28 "CON. CL" BEG STRIPING 60 LF 1 110 LF 2 110 LF 2 SEE SHEET T118 FOR INTERSECTION STRIPING IMPROVEMENTS. 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 PLAN MATCH LINE = STA 171+00 - SEE SHT SS108 40' 20' 0 40' 80' HORIZ: 1" = 40' SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES SIGN LEGEND BIKE PATH NO MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTORIZED BICYCLES R1-1 18" X 18" R44A (CA) 12" X 24" SGV 1 SGV 2 SGV 3 18" X18" SYMBOL LEGEND PROPOSED SIGN - SINGLE SIDED INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 5. 1 INSTALL 6" WHITE EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39. 23 INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. 4 INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER SHEET 56, DETAIL 6. 56 REMOVE AND REINSTALL SIGN AS SHOWN. OM3-L 6" X 18" OM3-R 6" X 18" M6-1L(CA) 12" X 9" M6-1R(CA) 12" X 9" MATCH LINE = STA 180+00 - SEE BELOW LEFT PLAN
MATCH LINE = STA 180+00 - SEE ABOVE RIGHT 54 SIGNING AND STRIPING PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.16.2024 SS109 FA-2263 CB 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 FENCE PANEL - ELEVATION SINGLE SWING GATE - ELEVATION 3 34" TYP." MAX. 8'-0" 7'-0"
4'-0" HIGH WHERE NOTED ON PLAN CONCRETE FOOTING (10" DIA. x 36") 1" SQ. STL. PICKETS (14 ga) 1 34" TOP & BOTTOM RAILS (12 ga) 3" SQ. POST 9.5' TO 14' OPENING CHANNEL WALL (E) EDGE OF AC PAVING3 34" TYP." 18"
42" CONCRETE FOOTING 6" SQ. GATE POST FILLER FENCE PANEL, LENGTH VARIES. FENCE PANEL 3" EXISTING WALL/FENCE SINGLE SWING VEHICLE ACCESS GATE (7'-0" HIGH) GATE UPRIGHTS, 2" (11 ga.) 1 34" TOP & BOTTOM RAILS (12 ga) CHANNEL CONCRETE FOOTING (10" x 36") WELD ON BOX HINGE-TYPICAL PANIC BAR EXIT DEVICE, ALUMINUM PERFORATED METAL PANELS. MAX. 12" OPEN PERFORATIONS 54" OPENING SINGLE SWING PEDESTRIAN GATE (7'-0" HIGH) CONCRETE FOOTING (12"x 36") GATE SWING (180°) GATE SWING (180°) CONSTRUCT 2" SQ. x 6' HIGH STL. GATE STOP POST TO LOCK GATE IN OPEN POSITION. POSITION POST TO MAXIMIZE GATE SWING OPENING CONCRETE FOOTING (12"x 24") GATE SWING - PLAN CONCRETE FOOTING (12"x 24")

DIRECTION

TO EXIT TRAIL
SYSTEM

DIRECTION

TO ENTER
TRAIL
SYSTEM GATE UPRIGHTS, 2" (11 ga.) CONSTRUCT 2" SQ. x 6' HIGH STL. GATE STOP POST TO LOCK GATE IN OPEN POSITION. POSITION POST TO MAXIMIZE GATE SWING OPENING AC PAVING PCC PAVING DISTANCE VARIES 14'-0" - 18'-6" HORIZONTAL ACCESS CLEARANCE 1a 1c LOCKABLE CANE BOLT 1d 1d_ 4" 4" INSTALL LOCKABLE CANE BOLT PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. GATE POST 58" DIA. X 24" HEAVY DUTY CANE BOLT LOCK CANE BOLT 1e_ GATE POST LOCK SHIELD LOCK SHIELD GATE POST PANIC BAR PANIC BAR AND STRIKE LATCH BRACKET 1eMETAL PANEL MAINTENANCE GATE PEDESTRIAN GATE ADJUSTABLE STRIKE LATCH BRACKET W/ STRIKE 4" SQ. GATE POST METAL PANEL ADJUSTABLE STRIKE LATCH BRACKET W/ STRIKE EXISTING WALL/FENCE PEDESTRIAN GATE FENCE PANEL MAINTENANCE GATE TRAIL SYSTEM SIDE OUTSIDE TRAIL SYSTEM SIDE FENCE PANEL MANUFACTURE: SERIES: STYLE: HEIGHT: COLOR: AMERISTAR OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT MONTAGE II - INDUSTRIAL ORNAMENTAL STEEL FENCE (4 RAIL) GENESIS 7' HIGH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OF PLAN BRONZE FENCE PANEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: THE FENCE PANEL LENGTHS MAY VARY TO ACCOMMODATE ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY AND COORDINATE WITH THE FENCE PANEL MANUFACTURE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. GATE CONSTRUCTION NOTES: THE FINAL PLACEMENT OF EACH PROPOSED GATE SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR THE CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. GATE MANUFACTURE: SERIES: STYLE: HEIGHT: COLOR: AMERISTAR OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT MONTAGE II - INDUSTRIAL ORNAMENTAL STEEL GATE (4 RAIL) GENESIS 7' HIGH BRONZE SERVICE VEHICLE & PEDESTRIAN GATES (7' HIGH) 1 NTS TUBE STEEL FENCE PANEL 2 NTS 55 CIVIL AND STRIPING DETAILS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.17.2024 C060 FA-2263 CC 7'-8" 8'-2" 5'-10" 2" 2" 1'-2" 1'-2" 1'-2" 1'-2" 1'-2" SEE DETAIL 3 THIS SHEET. 1 15/16" c/c 1" b/c 6" WIRE 6 GA 9' TYP. 3' TYP. 6" TYP. SHARED USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE PER CAMUTCD 6" TYP. SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE PER CAMUTCD 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 UNIVERSAL COLLAR BRACKET 4a 4b_4a_ 4b MESH DETAIL NOTES: 1. UNIVERSAL BRACKET FOR STANDARD USE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: 14 GAUGE STEEL COLLAR AND WIRE RETAINING PLATE 1/4 IN x 1 IN, NUT, WASHER AND CARRIAGE BOLT 5/16 IN x 1-1/2 IN, ALL GALVANIZED STEEL. CHANNEL WALL FENCE POST 3 NTS WELDED WIRE MESH FENCING 4 NTS 56 CIVIL AND STRIPING DETAILS PVT ENG PVT ENG K. DI COCCO S. FRIESON 12.17.2024 C061 FA-2263 CD SHARED-USE PATH DASHED YELLOW CENTERLINE 5 NTS SHARED-USE PATH SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE 6 NTS VEGETATIVE CLEARING AND GRUBBING DETAIL 7 NTS 1. DESIGN INTENT IS TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF TREES AND VEGETATION TO BE CLEARED. 2. ALL TRIMMING TO BE DONE ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF POMONA'S STREET TREE MANUAL. A PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY TRIMMING ON A HERITAGE TREE. CLEARING AND GRUBBING WITHIN LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE - 2' MIN. CLEARANCE FROM EDGE OF TRAIL 10' MINIMUM

VERTICAL CLEARANCE SAN JOSE CREEK MULTI-USE BIKEWAY X X X X

TS TSNO SIGNSN SIGNSN
TS W TEMPLE AVE 54' 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 10' 5' 0 10' 20' 1" = 10' TEMPLE TRAILHEAD 57 PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.12.2024 LG100 W TEMPLE AVE TRAILHEAD GRADING PLANSFA-2263 CE IN PROGRESS

TS TSNO SIGNSN SIGNSN
TS
TSL
W TEMPLE AVE S CAMPUS DR HARDSCAPE SCHEDULE DECOMPOSED GRANITE 3/L200 CONCRETE PERMEABLE PAVERS 4/L200 MULCH SURFACE - 3" DEPTH BIKE PATH SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 10' 5' 0 10' 20' 1" = 10' TEMPLE TRAILHEAD IN PROGRESS58 PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.11.2024 LH100 W TEMPLE AVE HARDSCAPE PLANS FD-24 AA 12"-18" HIGH PLANTER/RETAINING WALL MODULAR BENCH BENCH PLANTER TRIANGULAR BENCH FOOTING PLANTER PPPP 1417847E
MURCHISON AVE HARDSCAPE SCHEDULE DECOMPOSED GRANITE 3/L200 CONCRETE PERMEABLE PAVERS 4/L200 MULCH SURFACE - 3" DEPTH BIKE PATH SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 10' 5' 0 10' 20' 1" = 10' MURCHISON TRAILHEAD 59 PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.11.2024 LH101 MURCHISON AVE HARDSCAPE PLANS FD-24 AB MODULAR BENCH BENCH SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird RWS-M-B-C 1401 Mini Root Watering System with 4.0" diameter x 18.0" long with locking grate, semi-rigid mesh tube and Rain Bird 1401 0.25 gpm or 1402 0.5 gpm bubbler as indicated. With Check Valve. 30 / SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Wide Flow Drip Control Kit for Commercial Applications. 1" Ball Valve with 1" PESB Valve and 1" Pressure Regulating 40psi Quick-Check Basket Filter. 0.3gpm to 20gpm. 4 / Area to Receive Dripline Netafim TLHCVXR-053-18 Techline HCVXR Pressure Compensating Landscape Dripline with Check Valve and Anti-Siphon feature. 0.53 GPH emitters at 18" O.C. Dripline laterals spaced at 15" apart, with emitters offset for triangular pattern. 17mm. 7,781 l.f. / SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird PEB 1" 1", 1-1/2", 2" Plastic Industrial Valves. Low Flow Operating Capability, Globe Configuration. 2 / Nibco T-113 Class 125 bronze gate shut off valve with wheel handle, same size as mainline pipe diameter at valve location. Size Range - 1/4" - 3" 3 / Buckner-Superior 3000 1" Normally Closed Brass Master Valve that Provides Dirty Water Protection and 3-Way Solenoid Design. Available in 1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2", 2-1/2" and 3" sizes. 3 / Febco 825Y 1" Reduced Pressure Backflow Preventer 3 / Hunter XCH-0600-SS-P Electromechanical controller, 6 stations, outdoor model with mounted solar panel. Battery-powered. Stainless Steel Cabinet, mounted with Hunter mounting pole #XCHSPOLE. For residential/commercial use. 1 Hunter XCH-0600-SS-P Electromechanical controller, 6 stations, outdoor model with mounted solar panel. Battery-powered. Stainless Steel Cabinet, mounted with Hunter mounting pole #XCHSPOLE. For residential/commercial use. 1 Hunter XCH-0600-SS-P Electromechanical controller, 6 stations, outdoor model with mounted solar panel. Battery-powered. Stainless Steel Cabinet, mounted with Hunter mounting pole #XCHSPOLE. For residential/commercial use. 1 Calsense FM1.25-B 3 / Munro CP1502B Complete pump package: • 2-1/2hp, single-phase, high-pressure turf irrig pump, 2in. intake, 1-1/2in. discharge • Pump start + pump protection – SS 220v SmartBox works w/ low-amp (<.35) controllers or 2-wire systems • Pressure gauge • Pressure & temp sensors • Intake & discharge fittings • Enclosure –lockable, powdercoated, SS, vented, flexible design for right/left facing & side/bottom discharge. For product selection assistance or additional info: 800-942-4270 or [email protected] 1 Strong Box SBBC-30AL Low profile backflow enclosure, with marine grade aluminum. 30in.L, 30in.H, 16.25in.W. Front entry door with flush-mounted locking system 3 1401 1402 MVBF C1 C2 C3FS PMP EN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE 5/LI200 9/LI200 DETAIL 6/LI200 3/LI200 2/LI200 1/LI200 7/LI200 2/LI200 1/LI200 8/LI200 7/LI200 1/LI200 door with flush-mounted locking system Water Meter 1" New water meter at W Temple Ave. 10" water line. Water pressure provided by City of Pomona Water Resources Department, Roman Richards. 1 Water Meter 1" New water meter at Murchison Ave. 8" water line. Water pressure provided by City of Pomona Water Resources Department, Roman Richards. 1 Water Meter 1" 1 Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40-NP 142.7 l.f. Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40-NP 3/4" 380.0 l.f. Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40-NP 1" 5.1 l.f. Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40-NP 23.2 l.f. Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40-NP 3/4" 3.4 l.f. Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40-NP 1" 124.1 l.f. Pipe Sleeve: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 61.2 l.f. M1 M2 M3 CRITICAL ANALYSIS CRITICAL ANALYSIS Generated: 2024-11-25 12:18 P.O.C. NUMBER: 01 Water Source Information: New water meter at W Temple Ave. 10" water line. Water pressure provided by City of Pomona Water Resources Department, Roman Richards. FLOW AVAILABLE Water Meter Size: 1" Flow Available 37.5 GPM PRESSURE AVAILABLE Static Pressure at POC: 90 PSI Elevation Change: 1.00 ft Service Line Size: 10" Length of Service Line: 20 ft Pressure Available: 90 PSI DESIGN ANALYSIS Maximum Station Flow: 23.88 GPM Flow Available at POC: 37.5 GPM Residual Flow Available: 13.62 GPM Critical Station: A-2 Design Pressure: 40 PSI Friction Loss: 0.93 PSI Fittings Loss: 0.1 PSI Elevation Loss: 0 PSI Loss through Valve: 25 PSI Pressure Req. at Critical Station: 66.0 PSI Loss for Fittings: 0.03 PSI Loss for Main Line: 0.34 PSI Loss for POC to Valve Elevation: 0 PSI Loss for Backflow: 10.7 PSI Loss for Master Valve: 3.8 PSI Loss for Water Meter: 3.37 PSI Critical Station Pressure at POC: 84.3 PSI Pressure Available: 90 PSI Residual Pressure Available: 5.7 PSI Generated: 2024-04-04 12:47 P.O.C. NUMBER: 02 Water Source Information: New water meter at Murchison Ave. 8" water line. Water pressure provided by City of Pomona Water Resources Department, Roman Richards. FLOW AVAILABLE Water Meter Size: 1" Flow Available 37.5 GPM PRESSURE AVAILABLE Static Pressure at POC: 44 PSI Elevation Change: 5.00 ft Service Line Size: 8" Length of Service Line: 20 ft Booster Pump pressure provided: 47 PSI Pressure Available: 89 PSI DESIGN ANALYSIS Maximum Station Flow: 10.1 GPM Flow Available at POC: 37.5 GPM Residual Flow Available: 27.4 GPM Critical Station: B3 Design Pressure: 40 PSI Friction Loss: 0.23 PSI Fittings Loss: 0.02 PSI Elevation Loss: 0 PSI Loss through Valve: 11.6 PSI Pressure Req. at Critical Station: 51.8 PSI Loss for Fittings: 0.29 PSI Loss for Main Line: 2.94 PSI Loss for POC to Valve Elevation: 0 PSI Loss for Backflow: 12.3 PSI Loss for Master Valve: 0.7 PSI Loss for Water Meter: 0.65 PSI Critical Station Pressure at POC: 68.7 PSI Pressure Available: 89 PSI Residual Pressure Available: 20.3 PSI CRITICAL ANALYSIS Generated: 2024-11-26 14:54 P.O.C. NUMBER: 03 Water Source Information: New water meter at Corporate Center Drive. 10" water line. Water pressure provided by City of Pomona Water Resources Department, Roman Richards. FLOW AVAILABLE Water Meter Size: 1" Flow Available 37.5 GPM PRESSURE AVAILABLE Static Pressure at POC: 68 PSI Elevation Change: 0.00 ft Service Line Size: 12" Length of Service Line: 20 ft Pressure Available: 68 PSI DESIGN ANALYSIS Maximum Station Flow: 1.19 GPM Flow Available at POC: 37.5 GPM Residual Flow Available: 36.31 GPM Design Pressure: 40 PSI Friction Loss: 0 PSI Fittings Loss: 0 PSI Elevation Loss: 0 PSI Loss through Valve: 7 PSI Pressure Req. at Critical Station: 47.0 PSI Loss for Fittings: 0.0 PSI Loss for Main Line: 0.03 PSI Loss for POC to Valve Elevation: 0 PSI Loss for Backflow: 11.8 PSI Loss for Master Valve: 0.2 PSI Loss for Water Meter: 0.2 PSI Critical Station Pressure at POC: 59.2 PSI Pressure Available: 68 PSI Residual Pressure Available: 8.77 PSI NUMBER MODEL SIZE TYPE GPM WIRE PSI PSI @ POC PRECIP A-1 Rain Bird PEB 1" Bubbler 4.5 31.9 44.1 1.09 in/h A-2 Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Area for Dripline 23.88 66.0 84.0 0.62 in/h B1 Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Area for Dripline 10.1 53.0 68.3 0.84 in/h B2 Rain Bird PEB 1" Bubbler 3 31.6 44.1 1.06 in/h B3 Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Area for Dripline 9.55 51.8 68.7 0.58 in/h C-1 Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Area for Dripline 1.19 47.0 59.2 0.75 in/h C-2 Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Area for Dripline 1.1 47.0 59.2 0.74 in/h Common Wire 164.2 VALVE SCHEDULE Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 60 IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.9.2024 LI001 FD-24 AC

TS TSNO SIGNSN SIGNSN
TS
TSL
W TEMPLE AVE S CAMPUS DR 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W RW RW RW
RW
RW
RW
RW M1 BF FS ENMV C1 A-1 4.5 1" 23.9 A-21" 1" 34" 112" 34"34" 112" 1" SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird RWS-M-B-C 1401 Mini Root Watering System with 4.0" diameter x 18.0" long with locking grate, semi-rigid mesh tube and Rain Bird 1401 0.25 gpm or 1402 0.5 gpm bubbler as indicated. With Check Valve. 18 / SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Wide Flow Drip Control Kit for Commercial Applications. 1" Ball Valve with 1" PESB Valve and 1" Pressure Regulating 40psi Quick-Check Basket Filter. 0.3gpm to 20gpm. 1 / Area to Receive Dripline Netafim TLHCVXR-053-18 Techline HCVXR Pressure Compensating Landscape Dripline with Check Valve and Anti-Siphon feature. 0.53 GPH emitters at 18" O.C. Dripline laterals spaced at 15" apart, with emitters offset for triangular pattern. 17mm. 4,071 l.f. / SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird PEB 1" 1", 1-1/2", 2" Plastic Industrial Valves. Low Flow Operating Capability, Globe Configuration. 1 / Nibco T-113 Class 125 bronze gate shut off valve with wheel handle, same size as mainline pipe diameter at valve location. Size Range - 1/4" - 3" 1 / Buckner-Superior 3000 1" Normally Closed Brass Master Valve that Provides Dirty Water Protection and 3-Way Solenoid Design. Available in 1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2", 2-1/2" and 3" sizes. 1 / Febco 825Y 1" Reduced Pressure Backflow Preventer 1 / Hunter XCH-0600-SS-P Electromechanical controller, 6 stations, outdoor model with mounted solar panel. Battery-powered. Stainless Steel Cabinet, mounted with Hunter mounting pole #XCHSPOLE. For residential/commercial use. 1 Calsense FM1.25-B 1 / Strong Box SBBC-30AL Low profile backflow enclosure, with marine grade aluminum. 30in.L, 30in.H, 16.25in.W. Front entry door with flush-mounted locking system 1 Water Meter 1" New water meter at W Temple Ave. 10" water line. Water pressure provided by City of Pomona Water Resources Department, Roman Richards. 1 Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40-NP 139.4 l.f. Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40-NP 3/4" 205.1 l.f. Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40-NP 7.5 l.f. Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40-NP 3/4" 3.4 l.f. Pipe Sleeve: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 41.0 l.f. 1401 1402 MVBF C1FSENM1 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE TEMPLE TRAILHEAD 8/LI200 5/LI200 9/LI200 DETAIL 6/LI200 3/LI200 2/LI200 1/LI200 7/LI200 2/LI200 1/LI200 Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 10' 5' 0 10' 20' 1" = 10' TEMPLE TRAILHEAD NEW 1" WATER METER. P.O.C. HOT TAP ONTO 10" SERVICE LINE, 90 P.S.I AVAILABLE PRESSURE. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM METER POSITION AND CONNECTION TO SERVICE LINE ON-SITE. EXISTING TREE - PROTECT IN PLACE 61 PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.11.2024 LI100 W TEMPLE AVE IRRIGATION PLANS FD-24 AD TS

TSSL S SMH LID
SIGNSN TS TSSL VV VAULT VENT D=1.5 ICV
TS
TSSL WVWM WVWM WVWM WVWV WVWV TS TS SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS 12''SS C3 EN FS MV BF M3 34" 34" C-2 1.1 1" 1.19 C-1 1" SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Wide Flow Drip Control Kit for Commercial Applications. 1" Ball Valve with 1" PESB Valve and 1" Pressure Regulating 40psi Quick-Check Basket Filter. 0.3gpm to 20gpm. 1 / Area to Receive Dripline Netafim TLHCVXR-053-18 Techline HCVXR Pressure Compensating Landscape Dripline with Check Valve and Anti-Siphon feature. 0.53 GPH emitters at 18" O.C. Dripline laterals spaced at 15" apart, with emitters offset for triangular pattern. 17mm. 381.3 l.f. / SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Nibco T-113 Class 125 bronze gate shut off valve with wheel handle, same size as mainline pipe diameter at valve location. Size Range - 1/4" - 3" 1 / Buckner-Superior 3000 1" Normally Closed Brass Master Valve that Provides Dirty Water Protection and 3-Way Solenoid Design. Available in 1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2", 2-1/2" and 3" sizes. 1 / Febco 825Y 1" Reduced Pressure Backflow Preventer 1 / Hunter XCH-0600-SS-P Electromechanical controller, 6 stations, outdoor model with mounted solar panel. Battery-powered. Stainless Steel Cabinet, mounted with Hunter mounting pole #XCHSPOLE. For residential/commercial use. 1 Calsense FM1.25-B 1 / Strong Box SBBC-30AL Low profile backflow enclosure, with marine grade aluminum. 30in.L, 30in.H, 16.25in.W. Front entry door with flush-mounted locking system 1 Water Meter 1" 1 Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40-NP 3.3 l.f. Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40-NP 15.7 l.f. MVBF C3FSENM3 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE CORPORATE CTR DR 5/LI200 9/LI200 DETAIL 3/LI200 2/LI200 1/LI200 7/LI200 2/LI200 1/LI200 Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 10' 5' 0 10' 20' 1" = 10' CORPORATE CENTER DR ACCESS POINT 62 PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.11.2024 LI101 CORPORATE CENTER DR IRRIGATION PLANS FD-24 AE NEW 1" WATER METER. P.O.C. HOT TAP ONTO 12" SERVICE LINE, 68 P.S.I AVAILABLE PRESSURE. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM METER POSITION AND CONNECTION TO SERVICE LINE ON-SITE.

PPPP 1417847E
MURCHISON AVE 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W 8''W OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH M2 FS EN MV 34" 34"34" 34" 1" 1" C2 B1 1" 34" 1" 10.1 B11" 3 B21" B3 9.55 1" PMP BF1" 34" location. Size Range - 1/4" - 3" Buckner-Superior 3000 1" Normally Closed Brass Master Valve that Provides Dirty Water Protection and 3-Way Solenoid Design. Available in 1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2", 2-1/2" and 3" sizes. 1 / Febco 825Y 1" Reduced Pressure Backflow Preventer 1 / Hunter XCH-0600-SS-P Electromechanical controller, 6 stations, outdoor model with mounted solar panel. Battery-powered. Stainless Steel Cabinet, mounted with Hunter mounting pole #XCHSPOLE. For residential/commercial use. 1 Calsense FM1.25-B 1 / Munro CP1502B Complete pump package: • 2-1/2hp, single-phase, high-pressure turf irrig pump, 2in. intake, 1-1/2in. discharge • Pump start + pump protection – SS 220v SmartBox works w/ low-amp (<.35) controllers or 2-wire systems • Pressure gauge • Pressure & temp sensors • Intake & discharge fittings • Enclosure –lockable, powdercoated, SS, vented, flexible design for right/left facing & side/bottom discharge. For product selection assistance or additional info: 800-942-4270 or [email protected] 1 Strong Box SBBC-30AL Low profile backflow enclosure, with marine grade aluminum. 30in.L, 30in.H, 16.25in.W. Front entry door with flush-mounted locking system 1 MVBF C2FS PMP EN 2/LI200 1/LI200 7/LI200 2/LI200 1/LI200 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird RWS-M-B-C 1401 Mini Root Watering System with 4.0" diameter x 18.0" long with locking grate, semi-rigid mesh tube and Rain Bird 1401 0.25 gpm or 1402 0.5 gpm bubbler as indicated. With Check Valve. 12 / SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Wide Flow Drip Control Kit for Commercial Applications. 1" Ball Valve with 1" PESB Valve and 1" Pressure Regulating 40psi Quick-Check Basket Filter. 0.3gpm to 20gpm. 2 / Area to Receive Dripline Netafim TLHCVXR-053-18 Techline HCVXR Pressure Compensating Landscape Dripline with Check Valve and Anti-Siphon feature. 0.53 GPH emitters at 18" O.C. Dripline laterals spaced at 15" apart, with emitters offset for triangular pattern. 17mm. 3,328 l.f. / SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird PEB 1" 1", 1-1/2", 2" Plastic Industrial Valves. Low Flow Operating Capability, Globe Configuration. 1 / Nibco T-113 Class 125 bronze gate shut off valve with wheel handle, same size as mainline pipe diameter at valve location. Size Range - 1/4" - 3" 1 / 1401 1402 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE MURCHISON TRAILHEAD 8/LI200 5/LI200 9/LI200 DETAIL 6/LI200 3/LI200 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird RWS-M-B-C 1401 Mini Root Watering System with 4.0" diameter x 18.0" long with locking grate, semi-rigid mesh tube and Rain Bird 1401 0.25 gpm or 1402 0.5 gpm bubbler as indicated. With Check Valve. 12 / SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" Wide Flow Drip Control Kit for Commercial Applications. 1" Ball Valve with 1" PESB Valve and 1" Pressure Regulating 40psi Quick-Check Basket Filter. 0.3gpm to 20gpm. 2 / Area to Receive Dripline Netafim TLHCVXR-053-18 Techline HCVXR Pressure Compensating Landscape Dripline with Check Valve and Anti-Siphon feature. 0.53 GPH emitters at 18" O.C. Dripline laterals spaced at 15" apart, with emitters offset for triangular pattern. 17mm. 3,328 l.f. / SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY DETAIL Rain Bird PEB 1" 1", 1-1/2", 2" Plastic Industrial Valves. Low Flow Operating Capability, Globe Configuration. 1 / Nibco T-113 Class 125 bronze gate shut off valve with wheel handle, same size as mainline pipe diameter at valve location. Size Range - 1/4" - 3" 1 / 1401 1402 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE MURCHISON TRAILHEAD 8/LI200 5/LI200 9/LI200 DETAIL 6/LI200 3/LI200 door with flush-mounted locking system Water Meter 1" New water meter at Murchison Ave. 8" water line. Water pressure provided by City of Pomona Water Resources Department, Roman Richards. 1 Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40-NP 3/4" 174.9 l.f. Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40-NP 1" 5.1 l.f. Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40-NP 1" 124.1 l.f. Pipe Sleeve: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 20.3 l.f. M2 Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 TYP. 10' 5' 0 10' 20' 1" = 10' MURCHISON TRAILHEAD NEW 1" WATER METER. P.O.C. HOT TAP ONTO 8" SERVICE LINE, 44 P.S.I AVAILABLE PRESSURE. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM METER POSITION AND CONNECTION TO SERVICE LINE ON-SITE. 63 PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.11.2024 LI102 MURCHISON AVE IRRIGATION PLANS FD-24 AF Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 BACKFLOW PREVENTER N.T.S. FEBCO 825Y REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE BACKFLOW COVER GS-1 BY GUARDSHACK, GREEN PAINTED, W/ 2 LOCKS ON 4" CONC. SLAB BRASS NIPPLES AND ELL AS REQUIRED BRASS UNIONS AT EACH SIDE BRASS RISERS, SIZE PER MAINLINE MAINLINE PIPE, SIZE AS PER PLANS BRASS ELL AND NIPPLE, TYP. PVC COUPLER OR REDUCER AS REQUIRED, TYP. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS, 90 LBS. OF CONCRETE EACH, TYP. COVER SIZE + 6" 4" THICK MIN. CONC. PAD SLOPE 1% TO DRAIN SERVICE SIDE 12" MIN. NOTES: 1. ALL FITTINGS AND RISERS TO BE RED BRASS 2. VERIFY EXACT LOCATION WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 3. INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODES AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT. VERIFY LOCAL REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 1 P-CO-12 MASTER VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR N.T.S. FLOW METER AS SPECIFIED (2 WIRES TO CONTROLLER) 24" MINIMUM TO REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE 4" BRASS FLANGED ELL 18"X18"X18" CONCRETE SUPPORT BLOCK 2"X4" BRASS FLANGED REDUCER 2" BRASS FLANGE X 1PT ADAPTER FINISHED GRADE 4" BRASS FLANGE ELBOW P.O.C. 12" 24" 2"X24" PVC SCH 80 TOE PIPING. WATERPROOF CONNECTORS MASTER VALVE AS SPECIFIED PVC SCH 80 2"X8" NIPPLE 2"X12" PVC SCH 80 PIPING 2"X6"X16" CONCRETE WALL CAPS, TWO PER BOX, ONE EACH SIDE SPECIFIED RECTANGULAR VAVLE BOXES WITH EXTENSIONS AS NEEDED. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CONCRETE WITH CAST IRON LOCKING LIDS MARKED FS AND MV. BRASS RISER 2 P-GL-29 N.T.S. GATE VALVE FINISH GRADE 10" DIAMETER ROUND CONCRETE VALVE BOX WITH CAST IRON LID MARKED "GV" EISEL ENTERPRISES SERIES 10 OR EQUAL SET BOX 1" ABOVE GRADE IN PLANTING AREAS 4 COMMON BRICK SUPPORTS 10" DIAMETER PVC PIPE EXTENSION; LENGTH AS REQUIRED PVC MAIN LINE 6" SCHEDULE 80 THREADED NIPPLE NIBCO T-113 BRONZE GATE VALVE; LINE SIZE SLIP/THREAD COUPLING 18" BELOW FINISH GRADE P-ME-22 3 QUICK COUPLER VALVE N.T.S. CONCRETE VALVE BOX W/LOCKING CAST IRON COVER FINISH GRADE QUICK COUPLING VALVE: RAINBIRD 44 LRC W/ LOCKING COVER PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL PVC MAINLINE PIPE 2" X 2" REDWOOD STAKE W/ STAINLESS STEEL GEAR CLAMPS BRICK (1 OF 2) 3" MIN 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL 4 P-GL-09 DRIPZONE VALVE N.T.S. VALVE BOX CONCRETE W/ CAST IRON LID FINISHED GRADE PVC SCH 40 ELL LATERAL PIPE MAINLINE PIPE 3-INCH MIN 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL LATERAL PIPE PVC SCH 40 FEMALE ADAPTOR PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL 1" BALL VALVE VALVE ID TAG REMOTE CONTROL VALVE : RAINBIRD XCZ-100-COM PRESSURE REGULATING QUICK CHECK BASKET FILTER: RAINBIRD PRB-QKCHK-100 5 P-GL-06 1 3 4 5 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"15 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE AS SPECIFIED, ONE PER BOX. 12 10X15 RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. 3 PLASTIC I.D. TAG AT EACH VALVE. WATER PROOF WIRE CONNECTORS ON 30" LOOPED WIRES. 4 2" (50MM) MINIMUM, 4" (100MM) MAXIMUM BELOW TOP OF BOX. 5 2" (100MM) ABOVE FINISH GRADE AT SHRUBS. 67 3/4" (19MM) ABOVE FINISH GRADE AT LAWN. OUTLET PIPE SAME SIZE AS VALVE, 24" MINIMUM (300MM) TO FIRST FITTING. 8 45 DEGREE DOWN AS REQUIRED TO LATERAL PIPE DEPTH. 9 INCREASE LATERAL LINE SIZE AS PER IRRIGATION PLAN. 10 TWO 6X2X16 CONCRETE BLOCK CAPS, ONE EACH SIDE OF THE BOX. 1112 SCHEDULE 80 RISER. 13 MAIN LINE AS OCCURS. 1/2" WIRE CLOTH GOPHER SCREEN, WRAP UP SIDES. 1415 6" (150MM) THICK LAYER OF PEA GRAVEL BASE. P-SA2-05 6 SOLAR POWERED CONTROLLER 1 1/2" = 1'-0" SOLAR PANEL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER HUNTER XCH-0600-SSP OR EQUAL MOUNTED IN STAINLESS STEEL CABINET (INCLUDED) STAINLESS STEEL POLE AND MOUNTING BRACKET HUNTER XCHSPOLE OR EQUAL FINISHED GRADE DIRECT BURIAL CONTROL WIRES TO VALVES 12"x12"x18" CONCRETE PAD. MIX AND POUR IN THREE 90-LB BAGS CONCRETE. MAKE SURE POLE IS VERTICAL AND OPENING IN WIRE SWEEP IS ACCESSIBLE AND UNCLOGGED. NOTE: MAKE SURE CONCRETE PAD IS DRY BEFORE CONTINUING WITH THE INSTALLATION 7 P-ME-28 ROOT WATERING SYSTEM N.T.S. RAINBIRD ROOT WATERING SYSTEM (RWS) AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS BUBBLER: RAINBIRD AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH 4" LOCKING GRATE (INCLUDED) 18" SWING ASSEMBLY (INCLUDED) 1/2" MALE NPT INLET (INCLUDED) PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL LATERAL PIPE 4" WIDE X 18" LONG RIGID BASKET WEAVE CANISTER (INCLUDED) NOTES: 1. INSTALL PRODUCT SO THAT THE GRATE IS EVEN WITH THE FINISHED GRADE OR TOP OF MULCH 2. WHEN INSTALLING IN HARD OR CLAY SOILS, ADD 34" GRAVEL UNDER AND AROUND UNIT TO ALLOW FASTER WATER INFILTRATION 3. ONCE RWS HAS BEEN INSTALLED FILL BASKET WITH PEA GRAVEL BEFORE LOCKING LID P-GL-04 8 PVC MAINLINE. PIPE. 3/4" PVC LATERAL TYPICAL COMPRESSION FITTING. AIR RELIEF VALVE AT HIGH POINT, AS INDICATED.CENTER FEED EXAMPLE LATERAL FLOW PER 100 FT (GPM) END FEED EXAMPLE GRID PRECIPITATION RATES (IN/HR) MAXIMUM FLOW PER ZONE MAXIMUM LATERAL LENGTH (FEET) TYPICAL FPT ADAPTER AND COMPRESSION COUPLER. DRIP VALVE / FILTER / REGULATOR. TYPICAL OFFSET 2" FROM HARDSCAPE, 4" FROM PLANTED AREA. DOGBONE SHAPED CORNER SHAPED CURVED POLYGON HOURGLASS SHAPED POLYGON SHAPED "C" SHAPED ODD SHAPED TYPICAL RAIN BIRD DRIPLINE REQUIREMENTS N.T.S. TYPICAL OFFSET 2" FROM HARDSCAPE, 4" FROM PLANTED AREA. PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL. EASY FIT COMPRESSION ADAPTER. EASY FIT COMPRESSION COUPLING: RAIN BIRD MDCFCOUP. DRIPLINE SPACING AS NOTED. EMITTERS OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR SPACING. POLYETHYLENE OR PVC HEADER MANIFOLD, SIZE AS PER "MAXIMUM FLOW PER ZONE" CHART.

MAXIMUM LENGTH OF SINGLE
LATERAL, SEE CHART.

MAXIMUM LENGTH OF SINGLE
LATERAL, SEE CHART. 9 FX-IR-RB-DRIP-25 64 IRRIGATION DETAILS PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.6.2024 LI200 FD-24 AG Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 MUNRO COMPLETE PRO 3HP SIDE DISCHARGE 1" = 1'-0" 1 2" INTAKE LINE 2 1"-1 1/2" DISCHARGE LINE 3 208 230 V POWER FINISH GRADE (PUMP CAN BE PLACED ON GROUND OR CONCRETE PAD) 4 1 41 23 65 IRRIGATION DETAILS PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.6.2024 LI201 FD-24 AH

1. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS PARTICULARLY AS THEY PERTAIN TO GRADING FEATURES SUCH AS SWALES, DETENTION BASINS AND INFILTRATION AREAS THAT MAY HAVE AN EFFECT ON PLANTING AREAS. 2. LOCATIONS OF PLANTS ARE SCHEMATIC. ALL SHRUBS TO BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OFFSET OF TWO (2) FEET FROM ANY EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES AND TREES A MINIMUM THREE (5) FEET FROM UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES. 3. ALL TREES TO BE TAGGED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PURCHASE. 4. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE TO BE PRESENT TO APPROVE PLANT MATERIAL WHEN DELIVERED TO PROJECT SITE. 5. ALL PLANTS AND TREES STORED ON-SITE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURES IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 6. PLANTS ARE SHOWN DIAGRAMMATICALLY ON PLAN THEREFORE PLANT SPACING IN PLANTING NOTES AND PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE TO PLANTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR IS TO CALCULATE QUANTITY OF PLANTS CALLED FOR AND INSTALL ALL THAT ARE SHOWN ON PLAN. 7. ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTING, IRRIGATION AND PAVING DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED AND APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE 100% COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. WHERE MULCH IS SPECIFIED, PER PLANS, SPREAD 3-4" LAYER OF MATERIAL UNDER AND IN BETWEEN ALL PLANTS SO AS TO LEAVE SOIL COMPLETELY COVERED WITH MULCH. NO MULCH SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 2' OF TREE CENTER. 9. ALL TREES TO RECEIVE ROOT CONTROL BARRIERS PER PLAN. INSTALL ROOT BARRIER PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATION. ROOT BARRIER SHALL EXTEND 10 LINEAR FEET BEYOND TREE TRUNK IN EACH DIRECTION (20 FEET OF ROOT BARRIER ON EACH SIDE, 2 SIDES TOTAL) BETWEEN HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING A TREE FILL THE HOLE WITH 10 GALLONS OF WATER. LET DRAIN, AMEND AND AFTER PLANTING, EACH TREE SHALL BE WATERED WITH A MINIMUM OF 20 GALLONS OF WATER. REPEAT THE WATERING TWICE IN THE NEXT 3 DAYS, NOT SOONER THAN AT 24-HOUR INTERVALS. 11. SOIL TESTS TO BE CONDUCTED AS DESCRIBED IN LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. THESE TESTS ARE TO DETERMINE RECOMMENDED AMOUNTS OF FERTILIZER AND ANY HARMFUL SUBSTANCES THAT REQUIRE MITIGATION. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 12. DURING SOIL PREPARATION AMEND WITH GYPSUM (AGRICULTURAL CALCIUM SULFATE CA SO4) PER AMOUNT RECOMMENDED BY THE SOIL TEST RESULTS. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 13. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO DISCUSS ANY LANDSCAPE ISSUES BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTED AREAS DURING THE PLANT ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD BY MEANS OF CONTINUOUS WATERING, PRUNING, RAISING ROOT BALLS WHICH SETTLE BELOW GRADE, APPLICATION OF SPRAYS WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO KEEP THE PLANTINGS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASES, FERTILIZING, WEEDING, AND/OR OTHER OPERATIONS NECESSARY FOR PROPER CARE AND UPKEEP. PLANTING NOTES SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE PLS/POUND QTY REMARKS TREES AS Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree 36" L 8 CW Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Multi-trunk 36" L 2 CL Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow 24" box M 1 STANDARD CT x Chitalpa tashkentensis Chitalpa 36" L 4 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING QTY REMARKS SHRUBS AM2 Achillea millefolium Common Yarrow 1 gal. L 18" o.c. 14 NATIVE AE Arctostaphylos edmundsii 'Carmel Sur' Carmel Sur Little Sur Manzanita 1 gal. L 72" o.c. 3 AU Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnikinnick 1 gal. L 72" o.c. 6 AP Aristida purpurea Purple Threeawn 1 gal. L 24" o.c. 58 AM Artemisia californica 'Montara' Montara California Sagebrush 1 gal. VL 48" o.c. 42 BP Baccharis pilularis consanguinea `Pozo Surf` Pozo Surf Coyote Brush 5 gal. L 36" o.c. 58 NATIVE BS2 Baccharis sarothroides Desertbroom Baccharis 5 gal. L 72" o.c. 9 CY Ceanothus griseus horizontalis 'Yankee Point' Yankee Point Carmel Creeper 5 gal. L 60" o.c. 116 DA2 Diplacus aurantiacus Sticky Monkeyflower 1 gal. VL 36" o.c. 28 NATIVE EE Epilobium canum latifolium `Everett`s Choice` Everett`s California Fuchsia 1 gal. L 48" o.c. 18 NATIVE EW Eriogonum fasciculatum `Warriner Lytle` Warriner Lytle California Buckwheat 5 gal. VL 48" o.c. 25 NATIVE LC Leymus condensatus Giant Wild Rye 5 gal. M 48" o.c. 2 MD Muhlenbergia dubia Pine Muhly 1 gal. L 24" o.c. 317 PRUNE FLOWERS SM Salvia chamaedryoides Germander Sage 1 gal. M 48" o.c. 25 NATIVE SW2 Salvia clevelandii 'Winnifred Gilman' Winnifred Gilman Cleveland Sage 5 gal. L 48" o.c. 14 NATIVE SP Salvia leucophylla Purple Sage 1 gal. L 48" o.c. 28 SM3 Salvia mellifera Black Sage 5 gal. L 84" o.c. 5 NATIVE SR Salvia mellifera 'Jade Carpet' Jade Carpet Black Sage 5 gal. L 60" o.c. 19 PLANT SCHEDULE Service Alert Ground Under 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com 90% PROGRESS SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 95 66 PLANTING NOTES PVT ENG SAK. MCKERNIN K. MCKERNIN 12.6.2024 L001 FD-24 AI