Agenda packet — Porterville City Council, August 5, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

City Council Agenda August 5, 2025

Page 1 of 6 ends

REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY HALL, 291 N. MAIN STREET

PORTERVILLE, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 5, 2025, 4:00 PM
The City of Porterville provides access to view city council meetings electronically. Please note that this service is offered as a courtesy and may not always be accessible to the public. To ensure the opportunity to participate in public comments and scheduled public hearings, individuals must attend in person.

This meeting will be available for viewing via YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/@cityofporterville4149 ,
Please direct any questions to the Office of City Clerk at 559-782-7464.

Call to Order
Roll Call

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is the opportunity to address the City Council on any matter scheduled for Closed Session. Unless additional time is authorized by the Council, all commentary shall be limited to three minutes.

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:

A. Closed Session Pursuant to:

1 - Government Code Section 54956.8 – Conference with Real Property Negotiators/Property: APN: 253-018-001. Agency Negotiator: Richard Tree. Negotiating Parties: City of Porterville and Dr. Wilson Park. Under Negotiation:

Terms and Price.

2- Government Code Section 54957.6 – Conference with Labor Negotiator. Agency Negotiator: Richard Tree. Employee Organizations: Porterville City Employee Association, Management Confidential Series, Porterville Safety Support Unit, Porterville Police Officer Association, Porterville City Firefighter Association, Fire Officer Series, and all unrepresented management employees. 3 - Government Code Section 54956.95 – Liability Claim: Claimant: Claim filed on behalf of a minor. Agency claimed against: City of Porterville. 4- Government Code Section 54956.95 – Liability Claim: Claimant: Christian Crouzet. Agency claimed against: City of Porterville.

City Council Agenda August 5, 2025

Page 2 of 6 ends

5 - Government Code Section 54956.9(d) (2) – Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation – Significant Exposure to Litigation: Three (3) cases in which facts are not yet known to potential plaintiffs.
6 - Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) – Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation – Initiation of Litigation: Two cases.

7. - Government Code Section 54957 - Public Employee Appointment/Employment:

Title: City Manager
5:00 P.M. RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON REPORTABLE ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED

SESSION
Pledge of Allegiance Led by Council Member Rivas
Invocation

PRESENTATIONS
Employee of the Month - Sergio Esquivel
Tulare County Economic Development Corporation Presentation

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is the opportunity to address the Council on any matter of interest, whether on the agenda or not. Please address all items not scheduled for public hearing at this time. Unless additional time is authorized by the Council, all commentary shall be limited to three minutes.

REPORTS
This is the time for all staff informational items.

I. Staff Informational Reports

1. Code Enforcement Quarterly Report

2. Building Permit Activity 4th Quarter Report FY 2024-2025 (April-June 2025)

3. Streets Performance Measure Quarterly Report FY 2024-2025 (April - June 2025)

4. Golf Course Quarterly Report FY 2024-2025 (April-June 2025)

5. City Commission and Committee Attendance Quarterly Report FY 2024-2025 (April - June 2025)

6. City Council Member Appointments Attendance Quarterly Report FY 2024-2025 (April - June 2025)

7. 2025 Cross Connection Control Plan Update
City Council Agenda August 5, 2025

Page 3 of 6 ends

CONSENT CALENDAR
All Consent Calendar Items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion will be heard at the end of Scheduled Matters.

1. Authorization to Sell Retired Police Service Dog and Purchase Replacement Police Service Dog and Training
Re: Consideration to approve the sale of K9 "Neith "and the security kennel to Officer Jasmine McAlister for the amount of $1.00; and approve the purchase of one new police service dog and related training for two new canine handlers from Top Dog Training Center for the amount of $31,754.38.

2. Authorization to Purchase and Upfit a Replacement Vehicle for the Fire Department Re: Consideration to approve the purchase of one vehicle to replace Vehicle No. 2129, a 2009 Ford Expedition, at a cost not to exceed $85,000; authorize staff to complete the upfitting of the new vehicle with emergency equipment and tools at a cost of $30,000 plus applicable taxes and fees; and approve a ten percent (10%) contingency for the total project cost, for a total amount not to exceed $126,500.

3. Authorization to Purchase Master Meter 4G Radio Read Parts and Meters Re: Considering approval to purchase miscellaneous new meters, replacement meters, and/or meter registers during the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year for an amount up to but not exceeding $100,000.

4. Authorization to Purchase Water Shares or Surface Water for Groundwater Recharge Re: Consideration to authorize the purchase of water shares or surface water during the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year in the amount of up to $1,500,000.

5. Authorization to Purchase Sewer Lift Station Replacement Pump Motors Re: Considering approval of the purchase of replacement pumps from Flo-Line Technology Inc. for an amount not to exceed $77,515 for the City of Porterville's Twenty-Four Lift Stations for FY 25/26.

6. Authorization to Repair Transit Bus Transmission
Re: Consideration to authorize a transit bus repair by Saunders Automatic Service Inc. at a cost not to exceed $12,965.

7. Authorization to Enter into Software License Agreement with EKOS Software Re: Considering Approval to Enter into a five-year Software License Agreement with EKOS Software for fuel system management in the amount of $43,920.

8. Approval to Renew Microsoft Office 365 Government G1 Software Subscription Re: Consideration to approve the renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement for Office 365 Government G1 software subscription from CDW-G for a term of three years in the amount of $130,800.24.

9. Re-Authorize Revised MOU to continue participation in Tulare-Kings County Regional Hazardous Materials Team
City Council Agenda August 5, 2025

Page 4 of 6 ends

Re: Consideration to re-approve the revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the updated amendments to continue participation in the Tulare-Kings County Regional Hazardous Materials Team (RHM Team) for a five-year term beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2030.

10. Request for Will Serve Letter - 1520 E. Success Drive Re: Considering approval of a resolution for water service for the future development of an Accessory Dwelling Unit located at 1520 E. Success Drive.

11. Authorization to Roll Unpaid Utility Accounts to the 2025-2026 Property Tax Rolls Re: Consideration to adopt the draft resolution authorizing the Tulare County Auditor to place unpaid utility accounts on the 2025-2026 property tax rolls for collection.

12. Intent to Schedule a Public Hearing for the 2024/25 Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER)
Re: Considering approval to schedule a public hearing to take place at a future city council meeting in September 2025, to consider the 2024-2025 CAPER.

13. Approval of Community Civic Event - Kiwanis of Porterville - Mariachi Fest Market - September 20, 2025
Re: Consideration to approve the Community Civic Event application submitted by the Kiwanis of Porterville to hold the Mariachi Fest Market on Saturday, September 20, 2025, at Veterans Park, from 10:00 AM to 7:00 PM.

14. Approval of Community Civic Event - Porterville Chamber of Commerce - ReDOiTT Block Party - September 27, 2025
Re: Consideration to approve the Community Civic Event application submitted by the Porterville Chamber of Commerce to hold the ReDOiTT Block Party on Saturday, September 27, 2025, at downtown Main Street, from 5:00 PM to 8:00 PM.

15. Authorizing FY 2025–26 State of Good Repair (SGR) Project Re: Consideration to authorize the submittal of a funding request for Fiscal Year 2025–26 State of Good Repair (SGR) Program funds in the amount of $121,481.34 for Transit Center renovations, including a digital message board, lobby improvements, and kiosk upgrades; and approval of the associated resolution, Authorized Agent Form, and SGR Certifications and Assurances.

16. Quarterly Investment Portfolio
Re: Consideration to accept the quarterly Investment Portfolio Summary Report.

17. Financial Status Reports
Re: Consideration to accept the financial status reports.

18. Consideration of a Salary Range Adjustment for the Public Works Director Classification Re: Council to consider a salary range adjustment for the Public Works Director classification from Salary Range 281 to Salary Range 271; and consider the adoption of a resolution amending the Employee Pay and Benefits Plan effective August 5, 2025.

19. Status and Review of Declaration of Local Flood Emergency City Council Agenda August 5, 2025

Page 5 of 6 ends

Re: Review of the Declaration of Local Emergency made on March 13, 2023, concerning the significant weather event and impacts relative to flood event.

A Council Meeting Recess Will Occur at 8:30 p.m., or as Close to That Time as Possible

PUBLIC HEARINGS

20. Amendment of the City Code - Changes to the Special Speed Zones (2020 Speed Survey Update)
Re: Hold the Public Hearing to receive public comment and consider a draft ordinance amending Chapter 17, Article XV, Section 17-15, Prima Facie Speed Limits Determined on Certain Streets, in the City Code.

21. Establishing Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Districts and Tax Assessments for Parcels within Brookside Phases I and II
Re: Hold the Public Hearing to receive public comment on establishing Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District Number 58; and consider a draft Resolution approving the Engineer's Report and assessment method.

22. Ordinance Amending Article 611 of Chapter 21 of the Porterville Municipal Code Pertaining to Environmental Review Procedures and Preparation of Documents by Consultants
Re: Hold the Public Hearing to receive public comment and consider a draft ordinance amending the municipal code pertaining to environmental review procedures and preparation of environmental documents.

SECOND READINGS

23. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1913, Amending Series 300, Section 305.10(g) and Section 305.10(f) of the Porterville Development Ordinance Re: Adoption of an ordinance amending Series 300, Section 305.10(g) and Section 305.10(f) of the Porterville Development Ordinance, regarding implementation of sign-specific standards for monument and freestanding signs.

24. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1914, Amending Article VII of Chapter 18 of the Porterville Municipal Code Regulation Unsafe and Unauthorized Camping and Storage of Personal Property
Re: Adoption of an ordinance amending Article VII of Chapter 18 of the City of Porterville Municipal Code, which regulates Unsafe and Unauthorized Camping and Storage of Personal Property.

AB 1234 REPORTS
This is the time for all AB 1234 reports required pursuant to Government Code § 53232.3.

City Council Agenda August 5, 2025

Page 6 of 6 ends

1. Tulare County Task Force on Homelessness - July 16, 2025

2. Tulare County Association of Governments (TCAG) - July 21, 2025 - Meeting was cancelled.

3. Tulare County Economic Development Corp. (TCEDC) - July 23, 2025- Meeting was cancelled.

4. Downtown Porterville Committee - July 24, 2025

5. Porterville Municipal Airport Committee - July 30, 2025

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

OTHER MATTERS

CLOSED SESSION
Any Closed Session items not completed prior to 5:00 p.m. will be considered at this time.

ADJOURNMENT - to the meeting of August 19, 2025, at 5:30 p.m.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Ralph M. Brown Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, requesting electronic participation as an accommodation, or to be able to access this agenda and documents in the agenda packet, please contact the Office of City Clerk at (559) 782-7464. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting and/or provision of an appropriate alternative format of the agenda and documents in the agenda packet.

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the Agenda packet are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Office of City Clerk, 291 N. Main Street, Porterville, CA 93257, and on the City’s website at www.ci.porterville.ca.us.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: 1. Code Enforcement Quarterly Report
SOURCE: Fire
COMMENT: This informational report utilizes data from the “myPorterville” application for tracking code enforcement activity between April 1, 2025, through June 30, 2025. During the 4th quarter of fiscal year 2024/2025, each department of the City contributed towards recording 1030 code enforcement issues. Of these, 988 were corrected and 42 were continued into the 1st quarter of 2025/2026 for additional corrective action. The Code Enforcement Division issued 33 Administrative Citations.

At its meeting on July 20, 2021, the City Council reviewed its Ordinance related to the parking and storing of recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers. During the past quarter, Code Enforcement received twenty (20) complaints specific to recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers, of which fourteen (14) had been completed at the time of this report.

RECOMMENDATION: Information for review
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Code Enforcement FY 24-25 Q4
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Bryan Cogburn, Fire Chief
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Code Enforcement Report, Quarter 4, FY 24-25
Q3 Code Enforcement Activity # Requests # Completed % Closed Administrative Citations Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Abandoned Vehicle (Street) 49 48 97.96% $100 42 18 25 16 $10,100 Animal Control Services 1 1 100.00% $200 1 2 4 3 $2,000 Animals- agricultural animals 4 4 100.00% $500 11 24 16 10 $30,500 Animals- barking dogs 20 19 95.00% $1,000 18 8 2 4 $32,000 Animals- keeping too many or unauthorized species 7 7 100.00% $2,500 25 0 0 0 $62,500 Animals- roosters 10 10 100.00% FY 24-25 Total Assesment 97 52 47 33 $137,100 Building Department/ Permits 19 3 15.79%
Business License Inquiries 2 0 0.00% Shopping Carts Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total CEO, Building permit check 2 2 100.00% Collected 173 128 142 204 647 CEO, Business License 6 6 100.00% Disposed (Lbs.) 0 0 0 0 0 CEO, Shopping Carts 127 204 160.63%
CEO, Sign Removal 190 190 100.00% Private Property Vehicle Abatements Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total City Manager's Office/ General Request 10 9 90.00% Voluntary Abatement 47 29 28 24 128 Code Enforcement, General 34 29 85.29% Certified Voluntary Abatement 0 0 8 0 8 Community Development, General or MULTIPLE violations 10 1 10.00% Towed 7 0 1 4 12 Engineering 9 4 44.44% Total Vehicles Abated 54 29 37 28 148 Fences and freestanding walls 3 1 33.33%
Fire Hazard 3 3 100.00%
Fire Hydrant Leaking 1 1 100.00% Weed Abatement Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Garbage Collection/Illegal Dumping 19 2 10.53% Properties Noticed 78 13 1623 43 1757 General Feedback 3 1 33.33% Completed by Owner 53 12 11 31 107 Graffiti 15 15 100.00% Assigned to Contractor (private) 3 3 0 2 8 Health Hazard 6 3 50.00% Assigned to Contractor (city owned) 0 0 0 0 0 Homeless Encampments 87 85 97.70% Completed by Contractor 3 4 0 2 9 Housing Issue (Structure Related) 4 3 75.00% Admin Citations 42 22 16 7 87 Itinerant Vendor, Solicitor, Peddler 19 18 94.74%
Landscaping/trees- private property 15 11 73.33%
Meter Request 122 122 100.00%
Neglected property/trash & debris 17 11 64.71%
Outdoor Storage 2 0 0.00%
Parking Issue 1 1 100.00%
Parks 1 1 100.00%
Police/ Traffic Enforcement 29 27 93.10%
Potholes 16 15 93.75%
Refuse Can Replacement / Repair 12 11 91.67%
Refuse Tracking 1 0 0.00%
Report Leak 36 35 97.22%
Sheds or second units 1 0 0.00%
Sidewalk Condition 8 2 25.00%
Code Enforcement Report, Quarter 4, FY 24-25
Signs- In Public Right of Way
21 50.00%
Signs- Maintenance Issues
11 100.00%
Signs- Temporary
10 0.00%
Stop Light Issue
87 87.50%
Street Light Issue
54 80.00%
Street Sweeping
33 100.00%
Vehicles- inoperable vehicles 12 10 83.33%
Vehicles- Parked on lawn
42 50.00%
Vehicles- RVs/boats/etc 20 14 70.00%
Water Waste
99 100.00%
Weed Abatement 43 31 72.09%
Yard Sales, Frequent
11 100.00%
Q4 Total 1030 988 95.92%
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: 2. Building Permit Activity 4th Quarter Report FY 2024-2025 (April-June 2025) SOURCE: Engineering and Project Management
COMMENT: The Building Permit Activity Report (BPAR) presented herein to the City Council covers the months of April, May and June 2025. The two main categories include new residential permits issued and new commercial permits issued.

4th Quarter of FY 2023/2024 compared to 4th Quarter of FY 2024/2025 New residential permits issued during the 4th quarter of 2024/25 (70) showed a 204% increase from the 4th quarter of 2023/24 (23). New commercial permits issued during the 4th quarter of 2024/25 (2) showed an increase from the 4th quarter of 2023/24 (0).

Year-to-Date (July 2024 to June 2025)
New residential permits issued this fiscal year (215) are up 124% compared to the same period last fiscal year (96). New commercial permits issued during this fiscal year show no change from the previous fiscal year (5).

RECOMMENDATION: Information Only
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Building Permit Activity - April 2025

2. Building Permit Activity - May 2025

3. Building Permit Activity - June 2025
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Javier Sanchez, Engineering & Project Management Director Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: 3. Streets Performance Measure Quarterly Report FY 2024-2025 (April - June 2025)
SOURCE: Engineering and Project Management
COMMENT: The purpose of this staff report is to provide the City Council with an update on progress made on street reconstruction, overlay, micro-surfacing, and pothole repair efforts for the fourth quarter of FY 2024-2025 (April - June 2025). For the Council's information, when reviewing the report, the light blue bar represents the staff's estimated quantity of "work" for each category for the fiscal year. The black overlaid bar represents the quantity of work accomplished to date.

City street crews have focused mainly on street overlay, street repairs, and pothole repair efforts during this fourth quarter reporting period. The Villa Street Reconstruction Project (Olive Avenue to Henderson Avenue), the Main Street Reconstruction Project, Phase 2A (Putnam Avenue to Garden Avenue), and the Henrahan Street Reconstruction Project (Grand Avenue to Morton Avenue) are nearing completion. The Villa Street Reconstruction (Henderson Avenue to Westfield Avenue), Henderson Avenue Rehabilitation (Westwood Street to Patsy Street), Morton Avenue Reconstruction (Westwood Street to Plano Street), Grand Avenue (Fourth Street to Plano Street), Montgomery Avenue Reconstruction (Jaye Street to H Street), West Street Extension Improvements Project, and Date Avenue (Jaye Street to H Street) and Kessing Street (Date Avenue to River Avenue) widening are all under design.

RECOMMENDATION: Information Only
ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2024-2025 Level of Service Progress Report 4th quarter

2. 2024-2025 Level of Service Progress Report 3rd quarter

3. 2024-2025 Level of Service Progress Report 2nd quarter

4. 2024-2025 Level of Service Progress Report 1st quarter Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Javier Sanchez, Engineering & Project Management Director Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager

CITY OF PORTERVILLE
2024/2025 Level of Service Report 4th QUARTER REPORT - July 1, 2024 - June 31, 2025 Prepared By J. Sanchez
Task
1 Street Reconstruction/Rehabilitation Progress
Each square represents 1000 LF of street reconsruction. (Length represents street lanes)
4000 LF
12000 LF20000 LF28000 LF36000 LF44000 LF52000 LF60000 LF68000 LF76000 LF84000 LF92000 LF 100000 LF
Total FY 24/25: 0 Lineal Feet of Street Lanes

2. Overlay Progress
Each square Represents 500 LF of Overlayed Streets
(Length represents street lanes)
2000 LF6000 LF
10000 LF14000 LF18000 LF22000 LF26000 LF
30000 LF34000 LF38000 LF42000 LF48000 LF52000 LF
Total FY 24/25: 85,308 Lineal Feet of Street Lanes

3. Micro Surfacing Progress
Each square represents 1000 LF of Micro-Surfaced Streets (Length represents street lanes)
4000 LF
12000 LF20000 LF28000 LF36000 LF44000 LF52000 LF60000 LF68000 LF76000 LF84000 LF92000 LF 100000 LF
Total FY 24/25: 0 Lineal Feet

4. Pothole Repair Progress
Each Square Represents 250 SF of Pothole Repair
(Each Square Represnts Approx. 250 Potholes Repaired)
2000 SF4000 SF6000 SF8000 SF
10000 SF
12000 sf14000 sf16000 sf18000 sf20000 sf22000 sf24000 sf Total FY 24/25: 80,372 Square Feet
Total annual effort in lineal feet or square footage
Completed as of 06/31/2025
4th QUARTER REPORT - July 1, 2024 - June 31, 2025
P:\pubworks\Resources\Design\Traffic\Pavement Management\Level of Service Reports\2024-2025\2024-2025 Level of Service Progress Report 4th quarter.xls

CITY OF PORTERVILLE
2024/2025 Level of Service Report 3rd QUARTER REPORT - July 1, 2024 - March 31, 2025 Prepared By J. Sanchez
Task
1 Street Reconstruction/Rehabilitation Progress
Each square represents 1000 LF of street reconsruction. (Length represents street lanes)
4000 LF
12000 LF20000 LF28000 LF36000 LF44000 LF52000 LF60000 LF68000 LF76000 LF84000 LF92000 LF 100000 LF
Total FY 24/25: 0 Lineal Feet of Street Lanes

4. Pothole Repair Progress
Each Square Represents 250 SF of Pothole Repair
(Each Square Represnts Approx. 250 Potholes Repaired)
2000 SF4000 SF6000 SF8000 SF
10000 SF
12000 sf14000 sf16000 sf18000 sf20000 sf22000 sf24000 sf Total FY 24/25: 59,831 Square Feet
Total annual effort in lineal feet or square footage
Completed as of 03/31/2025
3rd QUARTER REPORT - July 1, 2024 - March 31, 2025
P:\pubworks\Resources\Design\Traffic\Pavement Management\Level of Service Reports\2024-2025\2024-2025 Level of Service Progress Report 3rd quarter.xls

CITY OF PORTERVILLE
2024/2025 Level of Service Report 2nd QUARTER REPORT - July 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024 Prepared By J. Sanchez
Task
1 Street Reconstruction/Rehabilitation Progress
Each square represents 1000 LF of street reconsruction. (Length represents street lanes)
4000 LF
12000 LF20000 LF28000 LF36000 LF44000 LF52000 LF60000 LF68000 LF76000 LF84000 LF92000 LF 100000 LF
Total FY 24/25: 0 Lineal Feet of Street Lanes

4. Pothole Repair Progress
Each Square Represents 250 SF of Pothole Repair
(Each Square Represnts Approx. 250 Potholes Repaired)
2000 SF4000 SF6000 SF8000 SF
10000 SF
12000 sf14000 sf16000 sf18000 sf20000 sf22000 sf24000 sf Total FY 24/25: 39,840 Square Feet
Total annual effort in lineal feet or square footage
Completed as of 12/31/2024
2nd QUARTER REPORT -July 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024
P:\pubworks\Resources\Design\Traffic\Pavement Management\Level of Service Reports\2024-2025\2024-2025 Level of Service Progress Report 2nd quarter.xls

CITY OF PORTERVILLE
2024/2025 Level of Service Report 1st QUARTER REPORT - July 1, 2024 - September 30, 2024 Prepared By J. Sanchez
Task
1 Street Reconstruction/Rehabilitation Progress
Each square represents 1000 LF of street reconsruction. (Length represents street lanes)
4000 LF
12000 LF20000 LF28000 LF36000 LF44000 LF52000 LF60000 LF68000 LF76000 LF84000 LF92000 LF 100000 LF
Total FY 24/25: 0 Lineal Feet of Street Lanes

4. Pothole Repair Progress
Each Square Represents 250 SF of Pothole Repair
(Each Square Represnts Approx. 250 Potholes Repaired)
2000 SF4000 SF6000 SF8000 SF
10000 SF
12000 sf14000 sf16000 sf18000 sf20000 sf22000 sf24000 sf Total FY 24/25: 10,348 Square Feet
Total annual effort in lineal feet or square footage
Completed as of 09/30/2024
1st QUARTER REPORT - July 1, 2024 - September 30, 2024
P:\pubworks\Resources\Design\Traffic\Pavement Management\Level of Service Reports\2024-2025\2024-2025 Level of Service Progress Report 1st quarter.xls Item No.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: 4. Golf Course Quarterly Report FY 2024-2025 (April-June 2025) SOURCE: Parks and Leisure Services
COMMENT: At the request of the City Council, staff is providing a report on participation numbers at the Golf Course for informational purposes. The report reflects the Fourth Quarter FY 2024/25.

RECOMMENDATION: Informational only.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. 4th Quarter Golf Stats
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Donnie Moore, Parks and Leisure Services Director
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Apr-24 Apr-25 May-24 May-25 Jun-24 Jun-25
Golfers 1304 1739 1072 1720 1431 1643
Repeat 9/Twilight 489 462 359 531 556 409
Tickets Used 559 832 450 681 575 687
Passes Sold 33 18 43 28 30 670
Carts 485 636 384 752 619
Total $15,477.00 $18,126.00 $14,183.00 $21,894.00 $17,788.00 $19,711.00 * Repeat 9: Additional 9 rounds after first 9
* Twilight: Afternoon discount rate
* Tickets: Surcharge with monthly play pass $1.00 9-hole, $2.00 18-hole * Passes: Monthly Passes sold

PORTERVILLE GOLF COURSE STATISTICS
Item No.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: 5. City Commission and Committee Attendance Quarterly Report FY 2024-2025 (April - June 2025)
SOURCE: Administrative Services
COMMENT: Staff herein provides for the City Council's information the attendance reports as of the fourth quarter FY 2024-2025 for the following City Commissions and Committees:
• Animal Control Commission
• Arts Commission
• Library & Literacy Commission
• Parks & Leisure Services Commission
• Transactions & Use Tax Oversight Committee
• CDBG Advisory & Housing Opportunity Committee
RECOMMENDATION: Information Only
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Animal Control Commission Attendance

2. Arts Commission Attendance

3. Library & Literacy Commission Attendance

4. Parks and Leisure Services Commission Attendance

5. Transactions and Use Tax Oversight Committee Attendance

6. CDBG Advisory and Housing Opportunities Committee
Attendance
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Yuliana Andrade, Administrative Services Director
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Item No.

Animal Control Commission As of June 30, 2025
Attendance Records
2025
10-Apr Notes:

Kathy Guinn P
Jerry Hall P
Kat Harris P
Shawn Schwartzenberger P
Lacie Goodlett A
*Meeting cancelled due to lack of quorum.
**Meeting cancelled due to holiday and/or scheduling.
2023 2023 2024 2024 2024 2024 2025
13-Jul 12-Oct 11-Jan 11-Apr 11-Jul 21-Oct 9-Jan Notes:

Kathy Guinn P A * P P A P
Jerry Hall P P * P P P P
Kat Harris P P * P P P A
Shawn Schwartzenberger P A * P P P P
Lacie Goodlett P P * A P A P
*Meeting cancelled due to lack of quorum.
**Meeting cancelled due to holiday and/or scheduling.
2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2023 2023
May June July 11-Aug 13-Oct 12-Jan 13-Apr Notes:

Kathy Guinn * * * P P P P
Jerry Hall * * * A P P P
Art Duron * * * P
Kat Harris * * * P P P P
Shawn Schwartzenberger * * P A P P
Lacie Goodlett P P P
*Meeting cancelled due to lack of quorum.
**Meeting cancelled due to holiday and/or scheduling.

Arts Commission As of June 30, 2025
Attendance Records
2025 2025 2025 2025
28-Jan 10-Feb 22-Apr 22-Jul
Kyree Perkins * P Vacated seat 4/2025
Emily Luna * P Vacated seat 4/2025
Maria Menga * A Vacated seat 2/2025
Emilie Dummar * A Vacated seat 3/2025
Yesenia Acsencio * P
Bonnie Boyd * P * P
George Albanez A
Jackie Buttice A
* No meeting held due to lack of quorum. ** No meeting due to scheduling. 2023 2023 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024
25-Jul 24-Oct 23-Jan 19-Apr 23-Apr 23-Jul 10-Sep 22-Oct Kyree Perkins * * P P P * P A
Emily Luna * * P P P * P A
Maria Menga * * A A A * A A
Dawn Bennett Vacated seat 7/2023
Emilie Dummar * P P P * P A
Bonnie Boyd P P
* No meeting held due to lack of quorum. ** No meeting due to scheduling. 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2023 2023
Apr May June July Aug Oct Jan April
Kyree Perkins P P P ** P * P P
Emily Luna P P P ** P * P P
Diego Monterrubio A A A ** A * A
Eden Santos A A P ** Vacated seat 8/2020
Maria Menga P P P ** P * P P
Dawn Bennett P P
* No meeting held due to lack of quorum. ** No meeting due to scheduling.

LIBRARY & LITERACY COMMISSION - Attendance Record As of June 30, 2025 P = Present; A = Absent; E = Excused absence; T = Tardy = Summer Hiatus
** = No meeting held
2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025
Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov

P P P P

E E E P

P P A P

P P P P

P P P E
*Attended via Zoom as non-voting member.
2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2025
Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan

P P P P P P P

P P P P E P P

P T P P P P P

A P P E E P P

P A A P P A T

P P P P P P E

P P P P E P P
*Attended via Zoom as non-voting member.
2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2024 2024 2024
June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

P P P P P P P
E Resigned 9/23

P P P P P P P

E P P P E E A

P P P P P P P

P P P P P
*Attended via Zoom as non-voting member.

Irene Ortega
Sonya Lopez
Kim Baumgardner
Patience Christenson
Esther Figueroa
Edith LaVonne
Susan Uptain
Fernando Serrano
Fernando Serrano
Sonya Lopez
Irene Ortega
Kim Baumgardner
Esther Figueroa
Edith LaVonne
Susan Uptain
Irene Ortega
Kim Baumgardner
Esther Figueroa
Edith LaVonne
Susan Uptain
Fernando Serrano
Sonya Lopez
PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES COMMISSION As of June 30, 2025

ATTENDANCE RECORDS
Parks & Leisure Services Commissioner's Record of Attendance 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Cathy Capone ** ** P A P P ** P P P E **
Diane Graybehl ** ** P P P A ** P P P E **
Kieran Daly ** ** P P P A ** P P E E **
** ** P P A P ** E P P P **
** ** P P P P ** E P P P **
Hannah Moore P P ** P E P P **
Blaine Smotherman ** ** P P P P ** P P P P **
** ** P P P P ** P P P P **
**No meeting held. * Due to lack of quorum, an informal discussion only took place.

Parks & Leisure Services Commissioner's Record of Attendance 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Phillip Duncan ** ** P P P E A E
Diane Graybehl ** ** P P P P P P E P P **
Kieran Daly ** ** P E P E P P P P P **
** ** P P P P E P P P P **
** ** P A
** ** P P P P E P P A P **
** ** P P P P P P P P P Res.

Blaine Smotherman P P P P **
** ** A P P P P P P P P **
**No meeting held. * Due to lack of quorum, an informal discussion only took place.

Parks & Leisure Services Commissioner's Record of Attendance 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Phillip Duncan ** ** P A P E E P P E P A
Diane Graybehl ** ** E P P P P P E P P E
Kieran Daly ** ** P P A P P P P P E P
** ** P P P P P P P A P P
** ** P P P P P E P P P E
** ** E P P A A P P P P P
** ** P P E P P P E P P P
** ** P A P P P P E A A A
**No meeting held. * Due to lack of quorum, an informal discussion only took place.

Resigned
Janet Uresti
Tom Fiormonti
Jason Gurrola
Jason Pommier
Arlene Pena
P = Present; E = Excused Absence; A = Absent; T = Tardy Term Expired 10/18
Janet Uresti
Tom Fiormonti
Jason Gurrola
Jason Pommier
Arlene Pena
P = Present; E = Excused Absence; A = Absent; T = Tardy Janet Uresti
Jason Gurrola
Arlene Pena
P = Present; E = Excused Absence; A = Absent; T = Tardy Transactions and Use Tax Oversight Committee As of June 30, 2025 Attendance Records
2024 2024 2024 2025 2025
28-May 27-Aug 26-Nov 25-Feb 27-May
Margaret Stinson P P * P A Apptd 05/21;Term exp 5/2028
John Billiou P P * P A Term expires 5/2026
Jerry Hall P P * P P Term expires 5/2026
Janice Kovars P Term ended
Shawn Byars P P * P P Term expires 5/2026
Joshua Sulier A Term ended
Angela Dennis A Term ended
Rae Dean Strawn A P * A P Apptd 07/19; Term exp 5/2026
Robert K. Falls Sr. P P * A P Apptd 05/21; Term exp 5/2028 * Meeting cancelled
2022 2022 2023 2023 2023 2023 2024
25-Aug 17-Nov 16-Feb 25-May 24-Aug 28-Nov 27-Feb
John Simonich P P A P P A P Resigned eff. 02/28/2024
Margaret Stinson P P P P P A P Term expires 5/2024
John Billiou P P A P P P A Term expires 5/2026
Jerry Hall P P P P P P P Term expires 5/2026
Janice Kovars P P P P P A P Term expires 5/2024
Shawn Byars P A P A P P P Term expires 5/2026
Joshua Sulier A P P P P P A Term expires 5/2024
Angela Dennis P A P A A P P Apptd 12/20; Term exp 5/2024 Rae Dean Strawn P P A P A P P Apptd 07/19; Term exp 5/2026 Robert K. Falls Sr. A P P P P A P Apptd 07/19; Term exp 5/2024 * Meeting cancelled
2020 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 2022
23-Sep 18-Nov 26-May 25-Aug 17-Nov 24-Feb 19-May
John Simonich P P P P A P P Term expires 5/2026
Margaret Stinson P P P P P P P Term expires 5/2024
Russell "Buck" Fletcher A P P A A A A Term ended
John Billiou P P P P P P P Term expires 5/2026
Jerry Hall A P A A P P P Term expires 5/2026
Janice Kovars P P P P A P P Term expires 5/2024
Shawn Byars P A P P P P P Term expires 5/2026
Joshua Sulier P P P P P P P Term expires 5/2024
Angela Dennis P P P P P Apptd 12/20; Term exp 5/2024
Rae Dean Strawn Apptd 07/19; Term exp 5/2026
Robert K. Falls Sr. Apptd 07/19; Term exp 5/2024
* Meeting cancelled
CDBG Citizens' Advisory and Housing Opportunity Committee As of June 30, 2025 Attendance Records
Reg. Mtg Reg. Mtg Reg. Mtg Reg. Mtg Reg. Mtg
Committee Member 4/18/2024 2/11/2025
Pat Contreras A P
Linda Mendez P P
Eriselda Lizarraga P P
Isabel Olmos P P
Rebecca Contreras A
Yalimar Garcia A
Jacqueline Verduzco Alanis P
Reg. Mtg Reg. Mtg Reg. Mtg Reg. Mtg Reg. Mtg
Committee Member 3/4/2020 2/25/2021 3/14/2022 2/28/2023 2/29/2024 Pat Contreras P P P P P
Linda Mendez P P P A P
Grace Munoz-Rios P
Doug Heusdens A A A
Rebecca Vigil A A P
Kelle Jo Lowe P P
Maria Gonzalez P
Eriselda Lizarraga P A A A
Isabel Olmos P P P
Rebecca Contreras P P P
Yalimar Garcia P P
Jacqueline Verduzco Alanis P P
* No meeting was held due to COVID.

Item No.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: 6. City Council Member Appointments Attendance Quarterly Report FY 2024- 2025 (April - June 2025)
SOURCE: Administrative Services
COMMENT: At its meeting on January 21, 2020, the City Council directed that staff prepare a quarterly report on Council Member attendance at meetings of boards and committees to which Council Members are appointed. This report represents meeting attendance during the fourth quarter of FY 2024-2025 (April through June 2025).

RECOMMENDATION: Informational Only
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Quarterly Report (April- June 2025)
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Committee/Board Member/Alternate April May June
Ad Hoc Committee- COVID-19 Greg Meister - Member 4/21/25 P Ed McKervey- Member 4/21/25 P
Ad Hoc Library Facility Planning Committee Raymond Beltran - Member Cannabis Committee Ed McKervey - Member
Raymond Beltran - Member
AJ Rivas - Alternate
Council of Cities Greg Meister - Member
Ed McKervey - Member
Downtown Porterville Committee Ed McKervey - Member
Stan Green - Member
Eastern Tule Groundwater Stan Green - Member 4/3/25 P 5/1/25 A Sustainability Agency JPA (ETGSA) Michael Knight-Alternate 4/3/25 P 5/1/25 P 6/5/25 P Flag Day Committee Greg Meister - Member 4/9/25 P 4/22/25 P 6/3/25 P Ad Hoc Heritage Committee Greg Meister - Member 4/9/25 P Ed McKervey - Member 4/9/25 P
Internal City Audit Committee Ed McKervey - Member
Stan Green- Member
Joint City/School District Committee Greg Meister - Member Ed McKervey - Member
Library Facility Planning Committee Raymond Beltran - Member Local Initiatives Navigation Center Committee (LINC) Raymond Beltran - Member 4/2/25 P 5/7/25 P 6/4/25 P AJ Rivas -Alternate
Mighty190 Committee Greg Meister - Member 5/12/25 P
Ed McKervey - Member
AJ Rivas - Alternate
Military Banner Committee Greg Meister - Member 4/23/25 P Raymond Beltran - Member
AJ Rivas - Member
Porterville Municipal Airport Committee Stan Green- Member AJ Rivas- Member
PDC Advisory Board Jason Ridenour - Member
Ed McKervey- Alternate
Porterville Flag Day Committee Greg Meister - Member
Stan Green - Member
San Joaquin Valley Special City Selection Greg Meister - Member Committee (Air Polution) Ed McKervey - Alternate
Tulare County Association of Governments/ Greg Meister - Member 4/21/25 P 5/19/25 P 6/16/25 P Transportation Planning Agency (TCAG) AJ Rivas - Alternate 5/19/25 P Tulare County City Selection Committee Mayor - City Member Designee - Alternate
Tulare County Economic Development Corporation (TCEDC) Greg Meister - Member 4/23/25 A Claudia Calderon - Alternate 4/23/25 P 5/28/25 P
Tulare County Local Agency N/A
Formation Commission ("LAFCO")
Tulare County Taskforce on Homelessness AJ Rivas- Member 4/16/25 P 5/21/25 P 6/18/25 P Stan Green- Alternate
Tule River Improvement JPA (TRIJPA) Ed McKervey - Member 4/7/25 P 5/21/25 C Stan Green - Alternate
P = Present A = Absent C= Cancelled
City Council Attendance - FY 2024-2025 Third Quarter Report April 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025
Porterville Area Development Authority (PADA)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: 7. 2025 Cross Connection Control Plan Update
SOURCE: Public Works
COMMENT: The California State Water Resources Control Board adopted the CrossConnection Control Policy Handbook on December 19, 2023, with an effective date of July 1, 2024. This handbook replaces the previous cross-connection control and backflow regulations found in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. This handbook states that all Public Water Systems must complete and submit their Cross-Connection Control Plan to the State Water Resources Control Board by July 1, 2025.

The purpose of a Cross-Connection Control Program is to prevent the backflow of water into the water distribution system, which could result in crosscontamination or pollution entering the system. This is achieved through the proper installation and maintenance of backflow prevention assemblies, devices, or methods that protect against the threat posed by any condition found on a user’s premises. Selecting the correct type of backflow protection and ensuring it is properly installed is both important and required by the new handbook. The use of approved backflow prevention assemblies safeguards the public water supply against all known or potential cross-connections.

A successful program relies on knowledgeable personnel who can identify actual or potential hazards, apply principles of backflow prevention, and enforce cross-connection control policies. Ongoing surveillance of the public water system to verify backflow prevention assemblies are functioning correctly and to identify any new hazards or changes in system configuration.

Certified Cross-Connection Specialists are vital for evaluating hazard levels and ensuring program compliance.

Public Water Systems are responsible for implementing and enforcing a CrossConnection Control Program. This responsibility may be fulfilled directly or through a contract or agreement with another party. However, Public Water Systems are not responsible for correcting cross-connections within a customer's internal plumbing. To effectively enforce the program, Public Water Systems must establish operating rules, ordinances, bylaws, or resolutions and possess the legal authority to take corrective action when a user fails to comply. This authority must include at least one of the following:

1. Denial or discontinuation of water service;

2. Installation, inspection, field-testing, or maintenance of a backflow prevention assembly at the user's premises; or

3. Prompt resolution of any issue to ensure compliance with the program.

Each Public Water System must designate at least one individual responsible for the development, reporting, tracking, and administration of its crossconnection control program. For public water systems with 3,000 service connections or more, the Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator must be a cross-connection control specialist. The City of Porterville currently has two staff members certified as cross-connection control specialists.

This informational report is provided to the Council to demonstrate compliance with the requirements outlined in the New Cross Connection Control Policy Handbook.

RECOMMENDATION: Informational Only
ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2025-CA 54-10010-City of Porterville Cross-Connection Control Plan Submission

2. Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Michael Knight, Assistant City Manager
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager

CITY OF PORTERVILLE
Cross-Connection Control Plan (CCCP)
Effective Date: July 1, 2025
291 NORTH MAIN STREET PORTERVILLE CA 93257
Phone: (559) 782-7514| FAX: (559) 782-8937
COMPLETED BY: SoCal Water Pro
Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 2

DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this chapter, all terms shall be defined as set forth in the California Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH), which include but or not limited to:
“Air-gap separation” or “AG” means a physical vertical separation of at least two (2) times the effective pipe diameter between the free-flowing discharge end of a potable water supply pipeline and the flood level of an open or non-pressurized receiving vessel, and in no case less than one (1) inch.
"Approved backflow prevention device" means a device which has passed laboratory and field evaluation tests performed by a recognized testing organization which has demonstrated its competency to perform such tests to the California Department of Health Services.
“Approved water supply” means a water source that has been approved by the State Water Board for domestic use in a public water system and designated as such in a domestic water supply permit issued pursuant to section 116525 of the CHSC. “Auxiliary water supply” means a source of water, other than an approved water supply, that is either used or equipped, or can be equipped, to be used as a water supply and is located on the premises of, or available to, a water user. “Backflow” means an undesired or unintended reversal of flow of water and/or other liquids, gases, or other substances into a public water system’s distribution system or approved water supply.
“Backflow prevention assembly” or “BPA” means a mechanical assembly designed and constructed to prevent backflow, such that while in-line it can be maintained and its ability to prevent backflow, as designed, can be field tested, inspected, and evaluated. “Backflow prevention assembly tester” means a person who is certified as a backflow prevention assembly tester.
"Building Department" means the City of Porterville Department of Public Works. "City" means the City of Porterville and its departments.
"Contamination" means a degradation of the quality of the potable water by any foreign substance which creates a hazard to the public health through poisoning or through spread of disease.
“Cross-connection” means any actual or potential connection or structural arrangement between a public water system, including a piping system connected to the public water Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 3
system and located on the premises of a water user or available to the water user, and any source or distribution system containing liquid, gas, or other substances not from an approved water supply.
“Cross-connection control specialist” means a person who is certified as a crossconnection control specialist. “Double check detector backflow prevention assembly” or “DCDA” means a double check valve backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass with a water meter and double check backflow prevention assembly, with the bypass’s water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. This type of assembly may only be used to isolate low hazard cross-connections.
“Double check detector backflow prevention assembly – type II” or “DCDA-II” means a double check valve backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass around the second check, with the bypass having a single check valve and a water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. This type of assembly may only be used to isolate low hazard cross-connections.
“Double check valve backflow prevention assembly” or “DC” means an assembly consisting of two independently-acting internally-loaded check valves, with tightly closing shut-off valves located at each end of the assembly (upstream and downstream of the two check valves) and fitted with test cocks that enable accurate field testing of the assembly. This type of assembly may only be used to isolate low hazard crossconnections. “Hazard Assessment” means an evaluation of a user premises designed to evaluate the types and degrees of hazard at a user’s premises.
"Health Agency" means the California Department of Health and Human Services, or the local health agency with respect to a small water system. "Health Officer" means the City of Porterville Health Officer. “High hazard cross-connection” means a cross-connection that poses a threat to the potability or safety of the public water supply. Materials entering the public water supply through a high hazard cross-connection are contaminants or health hazards. “Low hazard cross-connection” means a cross-connection that has been found to not pose a threat to the potability or safety of the public water supply but may adversely affect the aesthetic quality of the potable water supply. Materials entering the public water supply through a low hazard cross-connection are pollutants or non-health hazards.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 4
"Person" means an individual, corporation, company, association, partnership, municipality, public utility, or other public body or institution. "Pollution" means an impairment of potable water to a degree which adversely affects the aesthetic quality of the water, but does not create a hazard to the public health.
"Premises" means any and all areas on a customer's property which are served or have the potential to be served by the public water system.
“Premises containment” means protection of a public water system’s distribution system from backflow from a user’s premises through the installation of one or more air gaps or BPAs, installed as close as practical to the user’s service connection, in a manner that isolates the water user’s water supply from the public water system’s distribution system. “Pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly” or “PVB” means an assembly with an independently-acting internally-loaded check valve and an independently-acting loaded air inlet valve located on the discharge side of the check valve; with test cocks and tightly closing shutoff valves located at each end of the assembly that enable accurate field testing of the assembly. This type of assembly may only be used for protection from backsiphonage and is not to be used to protect from backpressure.
"Public water system" means a system for the provision of piped water to the public for human consumption which has five or more service connections or regularly serves an average of 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year. "Public Works, Water and Development Services Department" means the City of Porterville Water Department.
“Reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly” or “RP” means an assembly with two independently acting internally-loaded check valves, with a hydraulically operating mechanically independent differential-pressure relief valve located between the check valves and below the upstream check valve. The assembly shall have shutoff valves located upstream and downstream of the two check-valves, and test cocks to enable accurate field testing of the assembly.
“Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly” or “RPDA” means a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass with a water meter and reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly, with the bypass’s water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow
“Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly – type II” or “RPDAII” means a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass around the second check, with the bypass having a single check valve and a Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 5
water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow.
"Service connection" means the point of connection of a water user's system to the public water system.
“Spill-resistant pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly” or “SVB” means an assembly with an independently-acting internally-loaded check valve and an independently-acting loaded air inlet valve located on the discharge side of the check valve; with shutoff valves at each end and a test cock and bleed/vent port, to enable accurate field testing of the assembly. This type of assembly may only be used for protection from backsiphonage and is not to be used to protect from backpressure. “State Water Board”, unless otherwise specified, means the State Water Resources Control Board or the local primacy agency having been delegated the authority to enforce the requirements of the CCCPH by the State Water Resources Control Board. “Swivel-Ell” means a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly combined with a changeover piping configuration (swivel-ell connection). “User premises” means the property under the ownership or control of a water user and is served, or is readily capable of being served, with water via a service connection with a public water system.
“User’s service connection” means either the point where a water user’s piping is connected to a water system or the point in a water system where the approved water supply can be protected from backflow using an air gap or backflow prevention assembly.
“Water supplier” means a person who owns or operates a public water system. "Water user" means any person obtaining water from an approved water supply system. "Water user's system" means a system for the provision of piped water for human consumption on the premises of a water user.
"Water use site" means a location on a water user system where water is utilized for a purpose.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 6

ACRONYM/ABBREVIATION DEFINITION
µG/L Micrograms per liter
ABPA American Backflow Prevention Association
AVB Atmospheric Vacuum Breaker
AWWA American Water Works Association
BSDW Bureau of Safe Drinking Water
BWPC Bureau of Water Pollution Control
BWO Boil Water Order
CALEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CCCP Cross Connection Control Program
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CFS Cubic Feet per Second
CPWS Community Public Water System
DC Double-check valve assembly
DCDA Double-check detector assembly
E. COLI Escherichia coli
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
ERP Emergency Response Plan
GPM Gallons per Minute
MG/L Milligrams per liter
NCWS Non-Community Water System
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
NTNC Non-transient/Non-community Water System
O&M Operations and Maintenance
OSHA Occupational Health and Safety Administration
PVB Pressure Vacuum Breaker
PWS Public Water System
RP Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly
RPDA Reduced Pressure Principle Detector Assembly
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act
USC FCCCHR University of Southern California Foundation for CrossConnection Control and Hydraulic Research Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 7
Table of Contents
Definitions ................................................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 1 SYSTEM INFORMATION........................................................................................... 9

1.1 System Introduction........................................................................................................ 9

1.2 General Information......................................................................................................10

1.3 Program Introduction and Purpose .............................................................................11 Section 2 Legal Authority ...................................................................................................... 13

2.1 Program Implementation Schedule ............................................................................13 Section 3 Responsibilities ...................................................................................................... 14

3.1 Water Purveyor Responsibility.......................................................................................14

3.2 Customer Responsibility ................................................................................................15 Section 4 Surveys and Inspections....................................................................................... 16

4.1 Initial Assessments..........................................................................................................16

4.2 Follow-up and On-going Surveys and Inspections.....................................................20

4.3 Non-residential Inspections...........................................................................................22

4.4 Fire Protection................................................................................................................22

4.5 Reclaimed Water ..........................................................................................................23

4.6 Auxiliary Water Source..................................................................................................24

4.7 Temporary Connections...............................................................................................25

4.8 Single Family Residential Properties .............................................................................26

4.9 Stop and Waste Valves.................................................................................................26 SECTION 5 GENERAL BACKFLOW PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS........................................... 28

5.1 Types and Methods of Backflow Prevention...............................................................28

5.2 List of Approved Assemblies and Devices ..................................................................29

5.4 Installation Requirements..............................................................................................30 SECTION 6 TESTING AND TRACKING...................................................................................... 38

6.1 Repair or Replacement ................................................................................................39 Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 8
SECTION 7 ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES........................................................................... 40 Follow-Up and Penalties .....................................................................................................41

7.1 Failure to Comply ..........................................................................................................41

7.2 Failure to Test or Repair.................................................................................................42

7.3 Unauthorized Actions and Access Restrictions...........................................................43 SECTION 8 Signatures ............................................................................................................ 44 APPENDICES............................................................................................................................ 45 Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 9
SECTION 1 SYSTEM INFORMATION

1.1 System Introduction
The City of Porterville operates a municipally owned Community Water System (CWS) under State Water System Identification Number CA5410010, regulated by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Division of Drinking Water. As a public utility operated by the City, the system provides potable water service to the residents, businesses, and public facilities located within the city’s jurisdiction.

The system is classified as a D5 Distribution System, with a Treatment Designation (TD), though water is sourced exclusively from groundwater wells. All water is disinfected with chlorine before entering the distribution system to ensure compliance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. There are no surface water sources or intertie connections for wholesale purchases or sales; all water is produced and delivered directly by Cityowned infrastructure.

As of 2024, the City of Porterville serves approximately 21,000 year-round residents and maintains over 17,000 active metered service connections. These include residential, multi-family, commercial, industrial, and other non-residential users. Water demand is met through a network of City-operated wells distributed throughout the system.

In accordance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH) adopted by the SWRCB, the City has developed and maintains a comprehensive CrossConnection Control Program (CCCP) to protect its public water supply from actual or potential contamination resulting from backflow. This program is legally authorized and enforced through local ordinance and adheres to the ten required CCCPH program elements, including hazard assessment, testing, and enforcement.

Porterville currently manages a documented inventory of approximately 2,197 backflow prevention assemblies (BPAs), with over 2,100 active assemblies installed across commercial, industrial, institutional, and other designated high-hazard service locations.

All BPAs are tested at least annually by certified testers. Test failures are subject to repair or replacement within 30 days of notice, and results are tracked through the City’s asset management and compliance systems.

This Cross-Connection Control Plan outlines the City's regulatory responsibilities, enforcement procedures, inspection protocols, public outreach, and interagency coordination, in compliance with Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations and the most recent CCCPH effective July 1, 2024. The plan demonstrates Porterville’s commitment to safeguarding public health and ensuring uninterrupted delivery of safe, potable water.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 10

1.2 General Information
System Number or Reference (SDWIS ID) CA5410010
Identify the type of System:
• Community (C)
• Non-Transient Non-Community
(NTNC)
• Transient Non-Community (TNC)
COMMUNITY (c)
Distribution Classification Required (D1, D2, etc.) D5
Treatment Classification Required
(T1, T2, etc.)
TD
System Name and Address PORTERVILLE, CITY OF
Location/Town 291 NORTH MAIN STREET
PORTERVILLE CA 93257
Population Served and Service Connections Total Population: 63164 Total Connections: 17,641
No. of Residential: 15992
No. of Commercial Connections: 1353
Industrial: 15
Fire: Unknown
Irrigation:281
Agriculture: 0
Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 11
Name of CCC Program Coordinator: David Payne
Contact Information: Phone : (559) 782-7516
Email : [email protected]
CCC Specialist Employment Status: Consultant
Consultation Company Name: SoCal Water Pro LLC
Name of CCC Specialist: Timothy Lewsadder
Cross-Connection Control Specialist License Number: 03691 Certification Body: AWWA
Contact Information: Phone: 805-991-7333
Email: [email protected]

1.3 Program Introduction and Purpose
Introduction
The City of Porterville is committed to safeguarding its public water supply from contamination or pollution caused by actual or potential cross-connections. This CrossConnection Control Program (CCCP) outlines the policies, standards, and procedures necessary to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), the State Water Resources Control Board, and the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook, as well as Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR).

Through this program, the City aims to protect the integrity of its drinking water distribution system while supporting regulatory compliance and public health.

Purpose
Protecting public health requires proactive system design, routine inspections, and strict adherence to regulatory standards. The primary objective of the City of Porterville’s CrossConnection Control Program is to prevent the introduction of contaminants into the public water distribution system due to backpressure or backsiphonage. This is achieved by requiring the installation, maintenance, and inspection of approved backflow prevention assemblies at points of potential risk, typically where the public water supply connects to a private plumbing system. These assemblies are designed to ensure that water flows in only one direction, thereby preventing any reversal that could allow pollutants or contaminants to enter the potable water supply.

In support of this goal, the Plan establishes a structured and enforceable framework to:
• Identify and eliminate existing or potential cross-connections Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 12
• Classify hazards and determine the required level of backflow protection • Install and maintain approved backflow prevention assemblies at identified risk points
• Develop and maintain a comprehensive inventory of backflow prevention assemblies throughout the City
• Implement consistent inspection, testing, and tracking procedures • Promote public education and awareness of cross-connection control and prevention
• Enforce compliance with all applicable local and state regulations This Plan applies to all customers, property owners, and entities connected to or served by the City of Porterville’s public water system. It is designed to not only meet state and local legal requirements, but also to serve as a practical and proactive tool for protecting public health, maintaining water quality, and preserving the long-term integrity of the City’s water infrastructure.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 13
SECTION 2 LEGAL AUTHORITY
The City of Porterville’s CCCP is established under the authority of:
• California Health and Safety Code § 116407 -116275 et seq. • California Code of Regulations, Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook • California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) guidelines. • 2022 California Plumbing Code Chapter 6: Water Supply and Distribution, Section 603.0 Cross-Connection Control
• City of Porterville Municipal Code: Resolution NO. 9615 Cross-Connection and Backflow Preventions
Pursuant to these regulatory requirements, this Cross-Connection Control Program has been developed to ensure the ongoing protection of the City’s potable water supply.

Accordingly, all customers, property owners, and users served by the public water system are required to comply with the provisions outlined in this Program.

2.1 Program Implementation Schedule
Date Frequency
Adoption of Cross Connection
Control Policy
July 1, 2025 Once, and updated when
appropriate
Initial Hazard Assessment July 1, 2025—July 1, 2033 Daily until completed Customer Notification of Level of
Backflow Protection Required and
Compliance frame (if needed)
July 1, 2025—July 1, 2033 Daily until completed
New, Remodel, or Addition
Construction Plan Review
Within 90 days of the date of
submission
When submitted
Inventory of Backflow Prevention
Assemblies
July 1, 2025— July 1, 2033 Updated as necessary
Assembly Test Tracking Structure From initial assessment Established and updated as necessary
Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 14
SECTION 3 RESPONSIBILITIES

3.1 Water Purveyor Responsibility
As a public water purveyor, the City of Porterville is responsible for providing potable water that meets all applicable state and federal drinking water standards. The term “customers” refers to all service connections receiving water from the City’s distribution system, including residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal properties, as well as any connections associated with City-operated facilities.

In accordance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH), the City shall implement, administer, and maintain this Cross-Connection Control Program (CCCP) to prevent actual or potential contamination of the public water system. This includes the identification and control of hazards that may originate on the customer's premises, downstream of the point of connection to the public water supply. The City shall also take necessary measures to protect the water system from temporary or unauthorized connections that could compromise water quality, ensuring compliance with the California Code of Regulations and safeguarding public health.

3.1.1 Public Outreach and Education
As part of its responsibility to implement and maintain an effective Cross-Connection Control Program (CCCP), the City of Porterville is committed to ongoing public education and outreach. The City will provide information and guidance to residential, commercial, and industrial customers regarding the purpose of the program, the risks associated with cross-connections, and the importance of backflow prevention. These outreach efforts are essential to building awareness and fostering customer compliance with CCCP requirements.

Educational outreach will focus on increasing public understanding of the following key topics:
• What a cross-connection is and how it may occur
• Why backflow poses a serious risk to public health
• Customer responsibilities under the CCCP
• The importance of installing, testing, and maintaining approved backflow prevention assemblies
• The shared role of the City and the customer in protecting the integrity of the public water supply
Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 15
Public Education Methods
To ensure effective communication and broad reach, the City will utilize a variety of public education tools, including but not limited to:
• Brochures and educational inserts included with utility billing • A dedicated webpage featuring CCCP information, FAQs, testing instructions, and approved device lists
• On-site education and explanation during hazard assessments and surveys • Annual reminder notices regarding testing and maintenance obligations • Educational signage in municipal buildings and water utility offices • Targeted outreach during permitting, plan review, and contractor engagement processes
Special Focus for High-Risk Customers
Customers classified as high hazard such as industrial facilities, medical centers, or facilities identified in Appendix D of the CCCPH will receive enhanced education and support. This includes direct communication during hazard assessments and access to additional compliance guidance and resources tailored to their risk classification.

3.1.2 Building Plan Review
The City of Porterville Water Department will coordinate closely with the Department of Public Works in determining cross-connection control requirements during both the planning and retrofit phases of construction. For new construction, approved backflow prevention assemblies shall be installed at the time of utility infrastructure development.

In retrofit projects, assembly requirements will be assessed based on current use and hazard potential.

Water system personnel will also participate in the Certificate of Occupancy process to confirm that required backflow protection measures have been completed and documented prior to final occupancy approval.

3.2 Customer Responsibility
Customers are responsible for installing, testing, and maintaining appropriate backflow prevention assemblies on their premises where actual or potential cross-connections exist. They are also responsible for ensuring that all water-using equipment is installed in accordance with applicable plumbing codes, manufacturer requirements, and recognized best practices.

In accordance with CCCPH and City Municipal Code, customers must take reasonable and proactive measures to prevent contamination of the public water supply through internal cross-connections. This includes maintaining all backflow prevention assemblies in proper working conditions, ensuring timely testing by certified testers, and submitting all required documentation to the City.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 16
SECTION 4 SURVEYS AND INSPECTIONS

4.1 Initial Assessments
The City of Porterville will complete initial hazard assessments of all service connections within its service area no later than July 1, 2033.

Hazard assessment will be completed by:

Consultation Company Name: SoCal Water Pro LLC
Cross-Connection Control Specialist License Number: 03691 Certification Body: AWWA
Contact Information: Phone: 805-991-7333
Email: [email protected]
Initial Hazard Assessment Completion Timeline:

Year Service Connections Assessed
Year one All Non-Residential and
5% Residential Service Connections
Year Two 15% of Residential Service Connections
Year Three 15% of Residential Service Connections
Year Four 15% of Residential Service Connections
Year Five 15% of Residential Service Connections
Year Six 15% of Residential Service Connections
Year Seven 10% of Residential Service Connections
Year Eight 10% of Residential Service Connections
Process for Completing Initial and Ongoing Assessments
Hazard assessments for all service connections will be conducted by SoCal Water Pro LLC, a company employing certified Cross-Connection Control Specialists (CCCS). All assessments will follow the procedures outlined in Section 3.2.1 (a through c) of the CrossConnection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH).

For residential connections, non-physical assessments such as plan review, permit review, or customer questionnaires will be used unless there is reason to believe that a high hazard may exist. In such cases, a physical on-site inspection will be required. For nonresidential connections, physical hazard assessments are mandatory due to the increased potential for complex plumbing systems and hazardous materials. All assessments will be thoroughly documented and used to determine the appropriate level of backflow protection based on the degree of hazard identified.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 17
To evaluate the potential for backflow into the City of Porterville’s public water distribution system, each initial hazard assessment will consider the following factors:
• The presence of actual or potential cross-connections • The type and use of materials present or likely to be used on the premises • The complexity and accessibility of the plumbing system • The presence of auxiliary water supplies, pumps, or other pressurized systems • Distribution system conditions that may increase the risk of a backflow event, such as pressure fluctuations from main breaks, high demand situations, or multiple service connections
• Accessibility to the premises
• Any history of backflow incidents at the site
• All applicable criteria outlined in the CCCPH
Each assessment will classify the service connection as high hazard, low hazard, or no hazard. If a backflow prevention assembly (BPA) is already installed at the premises, the assessment must determine whether it provides adequate protection that corresponds with the identified degree of hazard. All initial hazard assessments will be reviewed and approved by a certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist to ensure compliance with all applicable CCCPH requirements and to confirm that appropriate backflow prevention measures are in place.

Backflow Protection
Through initial and ongoing hazard assessments, the City of Porterville will identify actual and potential cross-connections. These hazards will be addressed through the elimination of the cross-connection or by requiring the installation of approved backflow prevention assemblies, devices, or methods that provide protection consistent with the degree of hazard identified in the most recent assessment. The selection of assemblies, devices, or methods must follow the application guidelines set forth in the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH).

All backflow prevention assemblies, devices, or methods must comply with the installation requirements outlined in Section 3.3.2 of the CCCPH and the California Plumbing Code.

Fire Service Connections
For fire service connections, customers will have ten years from the effective date of this Cross-Connection Control Program to comply with the following requirements:

1. Install a minimum of a Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA) Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 18

2. Retrofit existing fire service connections with single detector checks to comply with CCCPH requirements, including conversion to an aboveground DCDA

3. Install a Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly (RP) for any fire protection system determined to be a high hazard
Meter Protection
All new non-residential service connections must include appropriate backflow protection, installed immediately downstream of the water meter and upstream of any tees or branches. The type of backflow prevention assembly required, whether a Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly (RP) for high hazard or a Double Check Assembly (DC) for low hazard, will be determined based on a hazard assessment in accordance with CCCPH Section 3.2.1.

All existing service connections will be evaluated for cross-connection hazards. Where protection is deemed necessary, the appropriate assembly must be installed as close as practicable to the water meter and upstream of all other piping or outlets.

Each newly installed or replaced assembly must be included on the list of approved devices maintained by the University of Southern California Foundation for CrossConnection Control and Hydraulic Research (USC FCCCHR). If any modifications are made to an approved assembly, the certified backflow prevention tester must notify the City of Porterville in writing.

Field Testing Requirements
• All backflow prevention assemblies installed under this Program must be tested in the field by a certified backflow prevention assembly tester following initial installation, repair, depressurization, or permanent relocation. • All field testing must be performed by individuals holding valid certification from an approved agency.
• Testing and all related costs are the responsibility of the customer. • Each assembly must be tested at least once every twelve months. The City of Porterville may require more frequent testing for assemblies located at highhazard premises or where previous testing history indicates elevated risk. • A passing field test must be submitted to the City before continuous water service will be provided to premises with newly installed assemblies. • If an assembly fails testing, it must be repaired or replaced within thirty calendar days from the date of failure notification.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 19
• If a certified tester observes a backflow incident or detects an unprotected crossconnection during testing, whether at the assembly or upstream of the premises, the tester must notify the City within twenty-four hours. The City will immediately investigate and, if necessary, suspend water service to prevent contamination of the public water system. Service will only be restored once the issue is resolved and a passing test has been submitted.
• If the City receives notice of a failed test result, the customer will be issued a compliance notice requiring correction within thirty days.

Backflow Incident and Unprotected Cross-Connection Reporting In accordance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH), the City of Porterville requires any certified backflow prevention assembly tester or water user who observes or suspects a backflow incident or unprotected cross-connection during testing or site evaluation to report the issue to the City immediately, and no later than within twenty-four hours of discovery.

Upon receiving a report of a suspected or confirmed incident, the City of Porterville will take the following actions:
• Initiate an immediate investigation to confirm the incident and evaluate the degree of hazard
• Discontinue water service to the affected premises if the incident is confirmed or if there is a significant risk to the public water supply due to the absence or failure of backflow protection
• Notify and coordinate with the Local Primacy Agency, the Division of Drinking Water, and the Local Health Officer, as required, within twenty-four hours in accordance with CCCPH Section 3.5.3
• Require the user to install, repair, or replace the necessary backflow prevention assembly before service may be restored
• Require the submission of a passing field test report, performed by a certified tester, to verify that the public water system is protected prior to reestablishing service
The preferred method of reporting to the City is by phone. Contact details are as follows:
• Contact Person: Jonathan Pruitt
• Phone: 559-782-1602
• Email: [email protected]
User Supervisor Requirements
Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 20
The State Water Resources Control Board and the City of Porterville may require the designation of a user supervisor for premises with complex piping systems that convey various fluids or where frequent system changes occur.

If a user supervisor is required, the following conditions apply:

1. The user supervisor must be trained and qualified to manage cross-connection control compliance on-site. The City will recognize training provided by approved organizations such as the American Water Works Association (AWWA), CaliforniaNevada Section, or another approved entity. Training must include identification and prevention of cross-connections, maintenance and operation of backflow prevention assemblies, and an understanding of hazards commonly present in industrial, commercial, and institutional settings. Initial training must be completed before designation, and refresher training will be required at least once every three years, or more frequently if determined by the City. Records of training and certification must be maintained and submitted to the City.

2. The user supervisor is responsible for preventing cross-connections during the installation, operation, and maintenance of the user’s plumbing system. The supervisor must be knowledgeable about the fluids used on-site and the appropriate backflow protection measures. They must also notify the City of any piping modifications and maintain current contact information on file with the City.

Unclassified or Special Risk Connections
If a service connection does not fall into a standard customer category, or if unusual plumbing configurations or hazardous activities are suspected, the City of Porterville will require a site-specific hazard assessment. A certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist will conduct a detailed on-site inspection and provide a written hazard report.

The City will review the findings and determine whether the proposed backflow prevention measures are appropriate and consistent with CCCPH requirements. The City reserves the authority to require additional protection based on the nature of the site, water use, and risk to the public water system.

4.2 Follow-up and On-going Surveys and Inspections
Follow-up surveys and inspections are a critical component of maintaining a safe, compliant, and effective Cross-Connection Control Program. These activities are designed to verify that identified hazards remain adequately controlled and that all backflow prevention assemblies (BPAs) continue to operate in accordance with the degree of hazard present at the site.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 21
The City of Porterville will conduct follow-up inspections under the following conditions:
• As part of the required ten-year reassessment cycle, or more frequently if circumstances warrant
• When significant changes are made to plumbing systems, operational processes, or the types of materials handled at a premises
• When there is a change in property ownership or tenancy • Following a confirmed or suspected backflow incident
• When a BPA fails an annual field test or exhibits frequent performance issues • At the request of the State Water Resources Control Board or the Local Primacy Agency
• When the City determines that the previously recorded degree of hazard may no longer be accurate or current
During a follow-up inspection, a certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist (CCCS) will:
• Review any changes to on-site plumbing, equipment, water usage, or facility operations.
• Verify the presence, type, and location of all BPAs.
• Confirm that each BPA is appropriate for the current degree of hazard. • Ensure each assembly is installed in accordance with CCCPH-approved criteria and has current passing test results on file.
• Document any observed cross-connections or code violations and recommend corrective actions if needed.

If any deficiencies are identified or if updated backflow protection is required, the City will issue written notification to the customer. The customer is responsible for completing all required corrections, including installation, repair, or replacement of BPAs, within the timeline provided by the City. Failure to comply may result in water service being discontinued, as allowed under the Cross-Connection Control Program.

All results from follow-up inspections will be recorded in the City’s backflow prevention assembly asset management system and retained in accordance with the recordkeeping requirements of the CCCPH.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 22

4.3 Non-residential Inspections
Water service connections to non-residential properties, including commercial establishments, industrial operations, municipal facilities, or other high-use sites—often involve more complex plumbing systems and may involve hazardous substances such as chemicals, sewage, irrigation water, or other potential contaminants. Due to these risks, each non-residential connection will undergo a comprehensive hazard inspection performed by a certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist.

The City of Porterville will designate the certified specialist responsible for completing the inspection and preparing a written hazard assessment report. If the customer declines inspection or if it is not feasible to perform an on-site evaluation, the City’s CrossConnection Control Program Administrator will require the installation of a Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly (RP) to ensure the highest level of protection for the potable water supply.

4.4 Fire Protection
All fire service connections, including systems for sprinklers, standpipes, hydrants, and private fire mains, are subject to hazard assessments conducted by a certified CrossConnection Control Specialist. These assessments will determine whether the fire protection system presents a high or low hazard to the public water system based on the following criteria:
• Use of chemical additives such as antifreeze or fire retardant foams • Connection to auxiliary water supplies or non-potable sources • System configurations such as combined domestic and fire lines or pump-fed systems
• Potential for stagnant water or backpressure conditions • Presence of on-site storage tanks connected to the fire service line Backflow Prevention Requirements
• Fire protection systems identified as high hazard must be protected with a Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly or an air gap, located as close as practicable to the meter and upstream of any branches
• Systems identified as low hazard may be protected with a Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA) or a Double Check Assembly (DC), provided that no chemical additives or auxiliary water supplies are present
Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 23
All assemblies used for fire protection must be approved by the City of Porterville and listed by the University of Southern California Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research (USC-FCCCHR).

Installation and Testing
Fire system backflow assemblies must be:
• Installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications and the installation requirements of the CCCPH
• Positioned to allow full access for inspection, testing, and maintenance • Field tested upon installation, annually thereafter, and following any repair, relocation, or depressurization
• Registered and tracked in the City’s BPA asset management system Enforcement
The City of Porterville may deny or discontinue water service to fire protection systems that are not equipped with the required backflow protection, that fail to pass required field tests, or that remain out of compliance following written notice. The City will coordinate with local fire officials and the customer to ensure that fire safety is maintained while also protecting the integrity of the public water supply.

4.5 Reclaimed Water
All properties utilizing reclaimed water must undergo a site-specific hazard assessment performed by a certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist. The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the configuration and separation of potable and reclaimed systems, confirm that proper backflow prevention is in place, and assess whether the system design poses a risk to the public water supply. The evaluation will also review system labeling, signage, and any history or potential for cross-connections. Dual plumbing systems that use both potable and reclaimed water must be clearly identified and properly constructed to prevent interconnection.

Properties that receive both potable and reclaimed water must install appropriate backflow protection on the potable service line. In most cases, this protection will consist of a Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly installed immediately downstream of the potable water meter and upstream of any additional connections. Any potential connection between potable and reclaimed systems must be isolated with an approved air gap or a backflow prevention assembly authorized by the City of Porterville.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 24
All reclaimed water piping must comply with the California Plumbing Code, including requirements for identification and labeling. Reclaimed water lines must be distinctly marked to prevent confusion with potable lines. Signage must be installed in visible areas to notify occupants and maintenance personnel that reclaimed water is in use and not intended for human consumption.

Backflow prevention assemblies serving reclaimed water systems must be field tested at the time of installation, at least once every twelve months thereafter, and following any repair, relocation, or modification. Any new or modified reclaimed water service must also pass a cross-connection test before activation. All test results must be submitted to the City of Porterville and recorded in the City’s backflow prevention asset management system.

If a cross-connection is suspected or confirmed between potable and reclaimed systems, the City will immediately initiate an investigation. Water service may be discontinued if necessary to prevent contamination. Service will not be restored until the hazard has been resolved and a passing test has been submitted by a certified tester.

The City will also notify regulatory agencies as required under state reporting protocols.

4.6 Auxiliary Water Source
An auxiliary water source refers to any water supply available to a customer’s premises that is not provided through the City of Porterville’s approved potable water system.

Examples include private wells, cisterns, irrigation systems, rainwater harvesting systems, or any other non-potable source. These sources pose a significant risk of backflow contamination if not properly protected and isolated.

To safeguard the public water supply, the City requires all premises with an actual or potential auxiliary water source to undergo a hazard assessment conducted by a certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist. This assessment will determine the degree of hazard and confirm whether sufficient backflow protection is in place. Any premises that receives both potable and auxiliary water is automatically considered a high hazard under the CCCPH.

Auxiliary sources must not be connected, directly or indirectly, to the potable system unless a properly installed and approved backflow prevention assembly is in place. In most cases, this protection must consist of a Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly located immediately downstream of the potable meter and upstream of any auxiliary connections. The assembly must be tested upon installation, annually, and after any repair or modification. Test results must be submitted to the City and logged into its backflow prevention asset management system.

If an auxiliary source is identified without approved protection, the City will issue a notice of violation. Water service may be discontinued until a compliant assembly is installed Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 25
and a passing test is submitted. Customers must notify the City before installing or activating any auxiliary water source on their property.

In accordance with CCCPH requirements, a shutdown test must be conducted as part of the initial hazard assessment for any property with an auxiliary water source. This test must be completed by a certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist and may be repeated every three years, with annual visual inspections. If a cross-connection is detected, the City will initiate corrective measures and report the issue to the appropriate regulatory agencies.

The City reserves the right to require more frequent testing or additional protective measures based on site-specific risks and will coordinate with public health and environmental agencies as needed.

4.7 Temporary Connections
Temporary connections to the City of Porterville’s potable water system are permitted only under controlled and pre-approved conditions. These connections are typically associated with construction, dust control, landscape irrigation, street cleaning, and other short-term activities. Because of their mobile and variable nature, temporary connections pose a potential risk to the water system and must be evaluated individually.

All temporary water use must be approved in advance by the City’s Cross-Connection Control Program Administrator. A certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist will determine the hazard level and specify the type of backflow protection required.

Depending on the activity, this may include metering, testing, and field inspection prior to use.

Typical examples and corresponding backflow requirements include the following:
• Public fire hydrants for non-emergency use: May be metered and require at minimum a double check valve assembly. The assembly must be installed and tested in accordance with City requirements.
• Truck fill stations: Must include backflow protection if the truck tank lacks an air gap. Metering may be required based on volume and duration. • Temporary irrigation of landscaping or public areas: May require a pressure vacuum breaker, double check valve assembly, or higher level of protection, depending on site-specific conditions. Metering is typically required. • Other miscellaneous uses: May require a combination of metering, backflow assemblies, inspections, or on-site evaluations to determine adequate protection.

Any backflow assembly used for a temporary connection is approved only for that specific location. If the assembly is relocated, it must be re-approved by the City and retested at the new location before use.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 26
Failure to comply with these requirements may result in denial or termination of service and may trigger enforcement actions. The City encourages early coordination for all temporary water needs to ensure protection measures are in place and service is provided safely.

4.8 Single Family Residential Properties
All properties connected to the City’s public water system, including single family residences, must be evaluated for actual or potential cross-connection hazards as required by the CCCPH. While most residential connections are considered low hazard, certain features may increase the risk and require additional protection.

Examples of residential cross-connection hazards include:
• Irrigation systems without approved backflow prevention • Pools, spas, or decorative ponds connected to a fill line without a Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly
• Evaporative coolers or swamp coolers without backflow protection • Submerged hoses in containers, tanks, or other vessels • Hose-end sprayers or aspirators used to apply chemicals Per CCCPH Section 3.2.1, the City may conduct hazard assessments at residential properties where these conditions exist. A certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist will evaluate the degree of hazard and recommend the appropriate containment method. If a high hazard is confirmed, the City may require installation of a Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly either at the service connection or at the specific point of hazard. For lower hazards, a Double Check Valve Assembly or other approved method may be acceptable.

Although much of residential cross-connection control is managed through the California Plumbing Code and building inspection processes, the City retains authority under CCCPH Section 3.1.3 to require corrective action if unsafe conditions are discovered. This may include assembly testing, relocation, or the installation of new protection.

All required residential backflow assemblies must be tested at the time of installation and annually thereafter. Testing must be completed by a certified backflow prevention assembly tester. Results must be submitted to the City and documented within the backflow prevention tracking system.

4.9 Stop and Waste Valves
Stop and waste valves located between the water meter and the backflow prevention assembly pose a significant cross-connection hazard. These valves often include unprotected outlets or drain ports that may be submerged, exposed to the atmosphere, Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 27
or connected to non-potable sources. This creates a potential pathway for contaminants to enter the potable water system through either backpressure or backsiphonage.

In accordance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH), all premises requiring backflow protection must have an approved backflow prevention assembly installed immediately downstream of the water meter or service connection.

The assembly must be located before any tees, branches, or devices, including stop and waste valves. As stated in CCCPH Section 3.2.2(b), the assembly must protect the entire premises and must not be bypassed by any uncontrolled or unprotected outlets located upstream.

Therefore, any irrigation system or water service configuration that includes a stop and waste valve between the water meter and the backflow prevention assembly must be modified to comply with this requirement. The stop and waste valve must either be removed entirely or relocated downstream of the backflow prevention assembly. Water service will not be continued or initiated until this correction has been completed and verified.

All modifications must be inspected and approved by the City of Porterville. The installation must conform to current standards for backflow prevention. A certified backflow prevention assembly tester must test the corrected system, and test results must be submitted to the City for compliance documentation.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 28
SECTION 5 GENERAL BACKFLOW PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS

5.1 Types and Methods of Backflow Prevention
The City of Porterville is committed to protecting the public potable water distribution system from contamination or pollution that may result from cross-connections located on customer premises. In accordance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH), the City requires the installation of an approved backflow prevention assembly immediately downstream of the water meter or service connection, and before any branches or appurtenances. This form of protection is referred to as containment or meter protection.

While containment provides critical protection for the public water system, it does not replace the need for internal cross-connection control within the customer’s property.

These internal protections, referred to as isolation, are typically governed by the California Plumbing Code and enforced by local building departments. Isolation measures safeguard the customer’s internal plumbing and occupants but are not a substitute for containment at the service connection.

In cases where existing connections are being retrofitted, a combination of containment and isolation may be necessary to ensure comprehensive protection. For such retrofits, the City may consider alternate locations for the containment assembly, subject to caseby-case evaluation and provided that the proposed location ensures full compliance with CCCPH requirements and adequately protects the public water supply.

The type of backflow prevention assembly required is based on the degree of hazard identified at the premises. As described in CCCPH Section 3.2.1, hazard assessments must account for all site-specific conditions, including materials or processes that could adversely affect water quality. Hazards are generally classified into two categories:
• Pollution, which alters the taste, odor, or appearance of the water but does not pose a health risk
• Contamination, which introduces substances that could cause illness, injury, or death and therefore constitutes a health hazard
Based on the results of the hazard assessment, the City will determine the appropriate level of backflow protection in accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, the California Code of Regulations, the CCCPH, and applicable City ordinances. In situations not specifically addressed by regulation, the City will exercise professional judgment to ensure adequate protection based on the level of risk and accepted industry standards.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 29
As the public water purveyor, the City of Porterville reserves the right to require a higher level of protection than the minimum standards established by state regulations or CCCPH when needed to safeguard public health. Likewise, customers may voluntarily install a higher level of backflow protection to enhance the security of their internal systems and operations.

5.2 List of Approved Assemblies and Devices
To ensure consistent protection of the public water system, all backflow prevention assemblies used for containment must be selected from the list of approved assemblies published by the University of Southern California Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research (USC-FCCCHR). This list includes assemblies that have been tested and certified for performance, reliability, and conformance with applicable standards.

The Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator, in consultation with a certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist, reserves the authority to determine the required type of backflow prevention assembly based on the degree of hazard identified during the site assessment. While the type of protection (such as a reduced pressure principle assembly or a double check valve assembly) is determined by the City, the make, model, size, and orientation of the selected device must appear on the current USC-FCCCHR list of approved assemblies.

This requirement applies to all new, existing, and replacement backflow prevention assemblies used to protect the City of Porterville's potable water system. Assemblies that do not appear on the USC approved list, or that are no longer recognized due to design changes or revocation of approval, are not permitted for installation or continued use.

All property owners must provide documentation showing that the installed assembly was included on the USC-FCCCHR approved list at the time of installation. This documentation must be submitted to the City during plan review, installation approval, or during inspection or testing events, as requested. Assemblies that cannot be verified as approved at the time of installation may be subject to removal and replacement at the owner’s expense.

Only assemblies installed in accordance with manufacturer instructions, City standards, and applicable codes will be accepted as valid containment devices. The City of Porterville also reserves the right to require orientation-specific assemblies in cases where installation conditions affect performance or testability, and to deny acceptance of assemblies that do not meet minimum access and spacing requirements for inspection, testing, and maintenance.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 30
The design of backflow prevention assemblies must ensure proper containment of potential hazards while meeting all regulatory, spatial, and operational requirements. In accordance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH), the City of Porterville requires that all backflow prevention assemblies be incorporated into system design in a way that allows protection of the public water system, ease of maintenance, and compliance with local code.

Key design considerations include:
• Location: Assemblies must be placed immediately downstream of the water meter or service connection and upstream of any branch or tee, unless otherwise approved. They must not be installed in flood-prone areas or confined spaces without proper accommodations.
• Accessibility: Adequate clearance must be provided to allow for testing, repair, and replacement. Assemblies must be safely accessible and visible without obstruction from landscaping or structures.
• Orientation and Approval: Only assemblies listed on the USC Foundation for CrossConnection Control and Hydraulic Research (USC-FCCCHR) list may be specified.

The model must be approved for the intended orientation (horizontal or vertical). • Site Conditions: Design must consider drainage for reduced pressure assemblies, protection from freezing or mechanical damage, and long-term access.

Design submittals must include the assembly type, make, model, size, orientation, and location, along with applicable site plans. Final approval is contingent upon conformance with CCCPH, the City of Porterville’s standards, and verification through inspection.

5.4 Installation Requirements
Installation of backflow prevention assemblies must follow manufacturer specifications, City of Porterville installation standards, and the CCCPH to ensure the assembly functions properly and provides full protection against backflow.

Installation requirements include:
• Assembly Location: The backflow prevention assembly must be installed immediately after the water meter or point of connection, before any tees or branches, and in the approved orientation. Alternative locations must be reviewed and approved by the City.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 31
• Assembly Type: The assembly must match the type specified during the hazard assessment and be on the USC-FCCCHR approved list in effect at the time of installation.
• Physical Protection: Assemblies must be protected from freezing, flooding, corrosion, and physical damage. Vault installations must include proper drainage and access and comply with confined space safety standards. • Clearance and Accessibility: A minimum of 12 inches clearance below the assembly and at least 12 to 24 inches of frontal access (depending on assembly size) must be maintained for testing and maintenance. The test cocks and shut-off valves must be fully accessible.
• Relief Valve Drainage: For reduced pressure assemblies, discharge must be routed to a safe drainage location without risk to structures or pedestrians. • Final Inspection and Testing: Upon installation, the assembly must be tested by a certified backflow prevention assembly tester. A passing field test report must be submitted to the City of Porterville before the connection is considered active and in compliance.

Non-compliant installations will be subject to correction prior to activation or continued service. The City of Porterville reserves the right to enforce stricter installation conditions where deemed necessary to protect the public water system.

5.4.1 Devices and Methods
Non-Testable Backflow Prevention Devices and Air Gaps
Non-testable backflow prevention methods, including air gaps, may be accepted under specific conditions during initial and ongoing hazard assessments conducted by a certified Cross-Connection Control Specialist. These methods may be approved only where they provide adequate protection based on the assessed degree of hazard and meet the requirements of the CCCPH and the California Plumbing Code.

Air gaps must comply with the minimum vertical separation requirements established in the CCCPH and the California Building Standards Code. Non-testable devices shall not be used in place of testable assemblies where the hazard classification is determined to be high or where a testable containment assembly is required by law, regulation, or City policy.

Swivel-Ells
The use of a swivel-ell as a substitute for an air gap in premises containment protection is permitted only in very limited cases involving temporary substitution of tertiary recycled Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 32
water use with potable water. The criteria below, as outlined in CCCPH Appendix C and CCR Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3, must be met for a swivel-ell to be approved:

I. The swivel-ell must be approved by the State Water Resources Control Board.

II. The City of Porterville, as the public water system (PWS), must have a fully developed and active cross-connection control program as required by CCCPH Section 3.1.3. The use and operation of the swivel-ell must also be described in the City's Cross-Connection Control Plan, pursuant to CCCPH Section 3.1.4.

III. The swivel-ell must be designed and constructed in accordance with CCCPH Appendix C.

IV. The PWS must perform and document annual inspections (at least every 12 months) to verify continued compliance with the design and construction requirements in Appendix C.

V. The Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly (RP) used with the swivel-ell must be field-tested and confirmed to be functioning properly as follows:
a) A visual inspection of the RP must be completed immediately after each switchover from recycled to potable water.
b) A field test of the RP must be completed within 72 hours of each switchover.
c) If potable water is supplied to the recycled water use site, the RP must be tested at least once every 12 weeks.

VI. A legally binding agreement must exist between the PWS (City of Porterville) and the recycled water provider. This agreement must be signed by authorized legal representatives and must include the following requirements:
a) The State Water Board must be notified within 24 hours of each switchover to or from potable water. The notification must include an estimated timeframe for the next switchover and the results of field testing required in item 5.
b) A trained representative of the PWS must be present to supervise every switchover event.
c) If requested by the State Water Board, the PWS must submit a written report within seven days of each switchover. The report must describe compliance with this section and include potable and recycled water usage data.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 33

5.4.2 Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly (RP or RPDA)
A Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly (RP) is a testable backflow prevention device designed to protect against both pollution and contamination under conditions of backsiphonage or backpressure. It is suitable for most high-hazard applications except for those involving sewage or reclaimed water.

Device Components
An RP must:
• Contain two independently acting approved check valves • Include a hydraulically operated, mechanically independent pressure relief valve between the check valves and below the first check valve • Have resilient-seated test cocks and shut-off valves at each end • Be certified by a recognized testing lab and listed on the USC-FCCCHR approved assembly list
Installation Requirements
Unless otherwise approved by the City’s CCCP Coordinator, RPs must be:
• Installed immediately downstream of the service connection, with no connections or outlets upstream of the assembly
• Mounted in a horizontal and level position (vertical only if specifically approved for that orientation)
• Located above ground, with the bottom 12 to 36 inches above finished grade • Protected from flooding, with adequate drainage and a free-flowing air-gapped drain
• Accessible for testing and maintenance, with at least 12 inches clearance above, 24 inches on the test-cock side, and 12 inches on other sides • Indoors only if all clearance and drainage requirements are met • Installed with expansion tanks or pressure relief valves as needed to protect against thermal expansion or water hammer
Reduced pressure detector assembly as an assembly designed to protect against pollution and contamination which is composed of a line-sized, reduced pressure principle assembly and a bypass that contains a water meter and another reduced pressure principle assembly.

This type of assembly is acceptable for use on Class 4, Class 5 or Class 6 fire sprinkler systems.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 34
Use Conditions
RPs must be tested at installation and annually by a certified tester. All results must be submitted to the City of Porterville. RPs are approved for continuous pressure applications and provide protection against both types of backflows when properly installed and maintained.

5.4.4 Double Check Valve Assembly (DC)
A Double Check Valve Assembly (DC) is a testable backflow prevention device designed to protect against low-hazard (non-health) backflow conditions, including both backsiphonage and backpressure. It consists of:
• Two independently acting, approved check valves
• Tightly closing resilient seated shutoff valves at each end • Properly located test cocks for testing and maintenance • Certification and listing by an approved testing agency such as USC-FCCCHR Installation Requirements
Unless otherwise authorized by the City’s Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator:
• The DC must be installed immediately downstream of the service connection, with no connections or outlets upstream of the assembly.
• It should be installed above ground in a horizontal and level position, or in a vertical orientation if specifically approved by the manufacturer and certified for vertical use.
• The assembly must be mounted 12 to 36 inches above finished grade and be readily accessible for inspection and testing.
• Expansion tanks or pressure relief valves must be installed when needed to control thermal expansion or water hammer.

Vault Installations
If above-grade installation is not feasible and a below-grade vault is approved:
• The top of the assembly must not be more than 8 inches below grade. • Minimum clearances must include:
o 12 inches below the assembly
o 24 inches on the test-cock side
o 12 inches on other sides
Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 35
• The vault must have drainage to daylight or free-draining soil, be protected from flooding and freezing, and must not be located in areas with vehicular traffic. • The vault must also be secured against vandalism.

Indoor Installations
Indoor installations are permitted only if all accessibility and clearance requirements are met:
• 12 inches clearance on top
• 24 inches on the test-cock side
• 12 inches on other sides
DCs are suitable for non-health hazards and are commonly used for irrigation systems, cooling towers, and other general-purpose applications. They may be used under continuous pressure.

5.4.5 Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA)
A Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA) is a specialized testable assembly designed for use in Class 1, Class 2, or Class 3 fire sprinkler systems where the hazard is non-health related. It consists of:
• A line-sized double check valve assembly
• A bypass line containing a smaller double check valve assembly and a water meter
• Two resilient seated indicating shutoff valves (OS&Y or similar) DCDAs are intended to monitor low-volume flow in fire protection systems, such as slow leaks or unauthorized use, without interfering with normal system activation. The bypass meter records small quantities of water to detect system activity between inspections or emergency use.

Installation and Use
DCDAs must follow the same clearance, orientation, and protection standards as DCs, including above-grade or vault placement.
• The bypass must be plumbed properly to ensure accurate metering and backflow prevention.
• The device must be installed immediately downstream of the service connection to protect the entire fire line.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 36
• A DCDA may not be used where chemical additives or non-potable water are introduced into the fire system. In such cases, an RPDA or RP assembly is required.

DCDAs are not required to be continuously metered but provide valuable monitoring capability for fire systems with infrequent flow. Testability, proper installation, and annual testing remain mandatory.

5.4.6 Vacuum Breaker Assemblies
“Atmospheric vacuum breaker” means a vacuum breaker that contains an air inlet valve, a check seat and one or more air inlet ports, in which:

1. The flow of water causes the air inlet valve to close the air inlet ports; and

2. When the flow of water stops:
a. The air inlet valve falls and forms a check valve against backsiphonage; and
b. The air inlet ports open to allow air to enter and satisfy the vacuum.

Pressure vacuum breaker is defined as:

3. Contains an independently operating, internally loaded approved check valve and an independently operating, loaded air inlet valve located on the discharge side of the approved check valve; and

4. Is equipped with properly located, resilient seated test cocks and tightly closing, resilient seated shutoff valves which are attached at each end of the assembly.

Use of vacuum breakers

1. An atmospheric vacuum breaker or pressure vacuum breaker may be used only for protection against pollution or contamination under conditions of backsiphonage.

2. If an atmospheric vacuum breaker is used:
a. The vacuum breaker must be installed not less than 6 vertical inches above the highest point of the downstream piping.
b. Any associated shutoff valve must be installed upstream from the vacuum breaker.
c. The vacuum breaker must not be subjected to operating pressure for more than 12 hours in any 24-hour period.
d. Flow from the protected fixture must be to the atmosphere.

3. If a pressure vacuum breaker is used, the vacuum breaker:

4. Must be installed:

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 37
i. Upstream from the terminal shutoff valve; and
ii. Not less than 12 vertical inches above the highest point of the downstream outlet, valve or piping.
e. Must not be installed at a location where backpressure will occur.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 38
SECTION 6 TESTING AND TRACKING
All backflow prevention assemblies used for service connection (containment) protection must be tested at least once annually by a certified backflow prevention assembly tester. Testing is also required:
• After installation of a new assembly
• After repair, replacement, or relocation
• Following a confirmed or suspected backflow incident
• More frequently, if determined necessary by the City based on the degree of hazard
Certification of Testers
Pursuant to the California Code of Regulations and the CCCPH, backflow prevention assembly testers must be certified by one of the following:
• California-Nevada Section of the American Water Works Association (AWWA) • American Backflow Prevention Association (ABPA)
• Another organization approved by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
Prior to performing any testing within the City of Porterville, each certified tester must register with the Cross-Connection Control Program. Registration must include:
• A copy of the tester’s valid certification from an approved agency (AWWA, ABPA, or SWRCB-approved equivalent)
• The serial number and model of the tester’s gauge
• A current calibration certificate for the test kit (dated within the past 12 months) The City will store this information in its BPA management system. Test results from unregistered testers will not be accepted.

Testing Responsibilities and Compliance
It is the customer’s responsibility to ensure that assemblies installed on their premises are tested as required. A passing test result must be submitted to the City of Porterville as a condition for receiving or continuing water service. Test results must be submitted within 30 days of the annual due date or the date of any repair or reinstallation.

City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 39
Cross Connection Control Plan
Test reports must be submitted in a format approved by the City and directed to the CCCP Coordinator. Failure to submit required test results, repairs, or replacement documentation may result in service interruption and/or administrative penalties.

Notification and Documentation
The City will provide customers with mailed notice approximately 60 days in advance of their assembly’s annual test due date. Customers are responsible for scheduling a certified tester and completing any needed repairs.

All test results, repair records, and related documentation must be retained by the customer and submitted to the City for tracking. The City of Porterville will maintain test records and compliance documentation for a minimum of five years, in accordance with CCCPH Section 3.3.3.

6.1 Repair or Replacement
In accordance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH), any backflow prevention assembly that fails a field test must be repaired or replaced within 30 days of the failed test. The customer is responsible for ensuring timely corrective action and providing all necessary documentation to the City of Porterville.

All replacement assemblies must:
• Match the required level of protection based on the assessed degree of hazard • Be listed on the USC Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research (USC-FCCCHR) approved assemblies list
• Be installed in accordance with the CCCPH, manufacturer specifications, and City of Porterville standards
Following repair or replacement, the assembly must be retested by a certified backflow prevention assembly tester, and the passing test report must be submitted to the City’s Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator. The City may issue additional enforcement notices or suspend water service if testing documentation is not received within the required timeframe.

Failure to complete corrective action and submit required documentation within 10 days may result in penalties or discontinuation of water service until compliance is achieved.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 40
SECTION 7 ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES
As part of the Cross-Connection Control Program, a contracted Certified CrossConnection Control Specialist will conduct initial surveys to identify and classify customer types within the City of Porterville’s water system. These surveys help determine the appropriate level of backflow protection based on the nature of the premises and the degree of hazard present.

Where warranted, follow-up surveys or inspections will be performed to confirm that the appropriate backflow prevention assemblies are in place and functioning. These assessments will also verify whether corrective actions identified during the initial review have been completed in accordance with program requirements.

Failure to comply with CCCPH, City ordinances, or the provisions of this Cross-Connection Control Program will result in a progressive enforcement process. The City of Porterville will take the actions outlined below to achieve compliance and protect the public water supply.

Enforcement Actions Chart
Violation Condition Enforcement Actions
Failure to
Comply
A cross-connection has been
identified, and either no
backflow prevention assembly
(BPA) has been installed or the
existing BPA is not appropriate
for the degree of hazard.

1. The customer will have thirty calendar
days from the assessment date to install
an approved BPA.

2. If noncompliance continues after thirty
days, a follow-up assessment will be
conducted. If the issue remains
unresolved, a formal Notice to Comply
will be issued.

3. If compliance is not achieved within sixty
days of the original assessment, water
service may be discontinued.

Failure to Test A BPA needs to be tested.

1. The customer will have thirty calendar
days from the date of notification to
complete the required test.

2. If the test is not completed within thirty
days, a Notice to Comply will be issued.

3. If testing is not completed within sixty
days, water service may be
discontinued.

Failure to Repair A BPA needs to be replaced or
maintained.

1. The customer will have thirty calendar
days from the date of assessment to
repair or replace the assembly.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 41

2. If the customer remains out of
compliance after thirty days, a follow-up
assessment will be conducted and a
Notice to Comply will be issued.

3. If the assembly has not been repaired or
replaced within sixty days, water service
may be discontinued.

Repeat
Noncomplianc
e or Immediate
Risk
The customer has a history of
noncompliance or the
identified hazard poses an
immediate threat to public
health.

Water service may be discontinued within
twenty-four hours depending on the severity
of the hazard. Additional penalties may
apply.

Follow-Up and Penalties
Once corrective actions are completed, the City will conduct follow-up inspections to confirm compliance. All backflow prevention assemblies must pass testing by a certified tester, and supporting documentation must be submitted to the City for approval.

In cases of repeated noncompliance, failure to respond to official notices, or the existence of an immediate threat to public health, the City of Porterville reserves the right to suspend water service until all corrective actions are verified and completed. Penalties may also include additional inspection fees or administrative fines as authorized by local ordinance.

The enforcement procedures outlined above ensure that the City of Porterville complies with the California Code of Regulations, the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook, and applicable public health protection standards.

7.1 Failure to Comply
All new construction projects within the City of Porterville must comply with the City’s Cross-Connection Control Program and incorporate the appropriate backflow prevention measures before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Water service will not be activated until a properly sized and approved backflow prevention assembly has been installed and tested by a certified backflow prevention assembly tester. The installation and testing must be conducted in accordance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook, applicable CalEPA guidelines, and must meet the satisfaction of the City’s Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator.

If an existing customer is required to install a backflow prevention assembly for meter protection following a hazard assessment, the City recognizes that a reasonable amount of time may be needed to:

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 42

1. Identify and secure funding for the installation

2. Complete design work and obtain City approval

3. Install and test the assembly through a certified tester to ensure proper operation In such cases, the City will collaborate with the customer to establish a mutually agreedupon compliance timeline. The timeline will be determined based on the degree of hazard present and the urgency of protection needed.

Typical guidance includes the following:
• For high-hazard premises, where an air gap or Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly is required, installation and testing should be completed within ninety calendar days of notification. In certain cases, the timeline may be shortened due to elevated risk, or extended slightly upon City approval based on site-specific conditions.
• For low to medium-hazard premises, where a Double Check Valve Assembly is deemed appropriate, compliance is generally expected within one hundred eighty calendar days of written notice.

If an actual cross-connection is discovered, the customer must correct the issue within thirty calendar days of written notice. Water service may be immediately discontinued if the hazard poses an imminent threat to the public water system.

Failure to meet the agreed-upon deadline or to comply with any requirement of the Cross-Connection Control Program may result in citations, penalties, or disconnection of water service until full compliance is verified.

7.2 Failure to Test or Repair
If a customer fails to submit the required test results, documentation of repairs, or confirmation of assembly replacement within thirty calendar days of the test due date, enforcement actions will be implemented in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code.

Although there is currently no established rate structure, applicable penalties may still be enforced as permitted by law.

The City will work with the customer to establish a final compliance timeline, not to exceed an additional thirty days, for the customer to complete the required testing, repair, or replacement.

Alternatively, if the customer provides written approval, the City’s Cross-Connection Control Program Administrator may coordinate the required services. All associated costs will be the responsibility of the customer.

Cross Connection Control Plan
City of Porterville | Cross Connection Control Plan 43
If the customer fails to respond or take action within the allotted timeframe, the City may discontinue water service in accordance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook and City policy.

7.3 Unauthorized Actions and Access Restrictions
Unauthorized replacement, removal, tampering, bypassing, or any action that renders a backflow prevention assembly inoperable is a violation of the City of Porterville's CrossConnection Control Program. Such actions compromise the safety of the public water system and are grounds for immediate termination of water service.

Any modification, deviation, or use of non-standard methods or materials related to the installation, maintenance, or operation of a backflow prevention assembly must be reviewed and authorized by the City of Porterville’s Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator or their designated representative. Unauthorized changes are considered non-compliant and may result in enforcement action.

If City personnel are unable to access a property to conduct a required hazard assessment or inspection to determine the presence of a cross-connection, the property owner will be required to install a reduced pressure principle assembly at the service connection. The installation must comply with all applicable regulations, and the test results and documentation must be submitted to the City for approval.

Failure to comply with these requirements, including denial of access, unauthorized system modifications, or failure to install required protection, may result in disconnection of water service until the issue is resolved and full compliance is demonstrated.

APPENDICES

1. Appendix A: Notice to Install Backflow Prevention Assembly for Meter Protection.

2. Appendix B Notice of Noncompliance – Backflow Prevention Assembly Not Installed

3. Appendix C: Backflow Prevention Assembly Test Notification Letter

4. Appendix D: Noncompliance – Backflow Prevention Assembly Testing Not Completed Notification Letter

5. Appendix E: Water Shutdown Notification Letter

6. Appendix F: Customer Complaint Form

7. Appendix G: Backflow Incident Report Form

8. Appendix H: City of Porterville Municipal Code: Resolution NO. 9615 CrossConnection and Backflow Preventions.

9. Attachment 1. Record of Backflow Assemblies & Devices

APPENDIX A
Notice to Install Backflow Prevention Assembly for Meter Protection [Today’s Date]
[Customer Name]
[Customer Address]
[Customer Address]
Dear: [Customer Name]
Subject: Notice to Install Backflow Prevention Assembly for Meter Protection To comply with the California Code of Regulations and the City of Porterville’s CrossConnection Control Program, your property, identified as a [type of business], must install a [type of backflow prevention assembly] immediately downstream of the water meter to protect the public water supply from potential contamination.

A cross-connection occurs when non-potable water has the potential to flow back into the potable system, often due to backpressure or back-siphonage. Examples include irrigation systems, chemical tanks, or unprotected plumbing connections. State regulations and our program require backflow assemblies to prevent such incidents.

As an existing customer, we recognize that compliance may require time for funding, design approval, and coordination with a certified tester. Based on your hazard classification [high, medium, or low], you are granted [90 or 180] days from the date of this notice to complete installation and testing.

Failure to comply may result in enforcement action, including discontinuation of water service. The City’s Cross-Connection Control Plan is available at: http:// https://www.ci.porterville.ca.us
Please contact us at [Phone Number] to confirm receipt of this notice and your plan to comply. We are available to assist with any questions.

Sincerely,
[CCCP Coordinator Name and Signature]
City of Porterville,
Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator

APPENDIX B
Notice of Noncompliance – Backflow Prevention Assembly Not Installed
[Today’s Date]
[Customer Name]
[Customer Address]
[Customer Address]
Subject: Notice of Noncompliance – Backflow Prevention Assembly Not Installed Dear [Customer Name],
Your facility, identified as a [type of business], is required under the California Code of Regulations and the City of Porterville’s Cross-Connection Control Program (CCCP) to install a [type of backflow prevention assembly] immediately downstream of the water meter to protect the public water supply. This requirement is based on your facility’s classification as a [high, medium, or low] hazard risk. The full CCCP is available at https:// https://www.ci.porterville.ca.us.

According to the City’s prior notification dated [Original Letter Date], you were given [90 or 180] days to complete this installation. As of today, the required assembly has not been installed or tested.

You must contact this office immediately to confirm when the backflow prevention assembly will be installed and tested by a certified Backflow Prevention Assembly Tester.

This must be completed within thirty calendar days from the date of this letter unless the City provides written approval for an alternate timeline. If compliance is not achieved by [Insert Deadline: Today’s Date + 30 days], water service to your facility may be terminated without further notice.

Thank you for your prompt attention. Please contact me at [Phone Number] with any questions or to provide an update.

Sincerely,
[CCCP Coordinator Name]
City of Porterville
Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator

APPENDIX C
Notice of Noncompliance – Backflow Prevention Assembly Not Installed
Cross-Connection Control Program
[Today’s Date]
[Customer Name]
[Customer Address]
[Customer Address]
Dear: [Customer Name]
Subject: Backflow Prevention Assembly Testing Requirement Our records show that your facility has a backflow prevention assembly installed to protect the City of Porterville’s water distribution system from potential cross-connections in the event of backflow.

The assembly listed below is now due for [semi-annual or annual] testing by a certified backflow prevention assembly tester:

Assembly Information:
• Brand: [Brand] Size: [Size] Type: [Type]
• Model: [Model] Serial Number: [Serial No.]
• Location: [Description of location]
The required testing must be completed by [Due Date]. In accordance with the City’s Cross-Connection Control Program, the test results and any necessary repair or replacement documentation must be submitted within thirty calendar days of this due date.

Failure to comply will result in a late fee per the City’s rate schedule. If testing, repair, or replacement is not completed within sixty days of the required test date, water service may be discontinued.

If needed, you may coordinate with the City’s Cross-Connection Control Program Administrator to have the work performed. All associated costs will be your responsibility.

Please contact our office at [Phone Number] if you have any questions or need assistance.

Sincerely,
[CCCP Coordinator Name and Signature]
City of Porterville, Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator

APPENDIX D
Noncompliance – Backflow Prevention Assembly Testing Not Completed Notification Letter
[Today’s Date]
[Customer Name]
[Customer Address]
[Customer Address]
Dear: [Customer Name]
Subject: Noncompliance – Backflow Prevention Assembly Testing Not Completed We previously sent [a notice / two notices] regarding your obligation to complete testing of your backflow prevention assembly by [Original Test Due Date], in accordance with the City of Porterville’s Cross-Connection Control Program.

Assembly Details:
• Brand: [Brand] Size: [Size] Type: [Type]
• Model: [Model] Serial Number: [Serial No.]
• Location: [Location Description]
As of the date of this letter, we have not received the required test results, repair verification, or replacement documentation from a certified backflow prevention assembly tester. Compliance with the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook and the City of Porterville’s water system requirements is mandatory.

Failure to submit the required documentation within thirty calendar days of the original test due date has resulted in a late charge in accordance with the City’s approved rate structure.

You must contact our office immediately to confirm when the assembly will be tested, repaired, or replaced if necessary. This must be completed within thirty days of this letter.

Alternatively, with your written consent, the City may coordinate testing or repairs on your behalf, with all associated costs billed to you.

If compliance is not achieved by [Original Test Due Date + 60 Days], water service may be discontinued.

Please contact us at [Phone Number] if you have any questions or need assistance.

Sincerely,
[CCCP Coordinator Name and Signature]
City of Porterville, Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator

APPENDIX E
Water Shutdown Notification Letter
[Today’s Date]
[Customer Name]
[Customer Address]
[Customer Address]
Dear: [Customer Name]
Subject: Temporary Water Service Shut Down
Please be advised that a temporary shutdown of [Specific Water Service] is scheduled due to:
☐ Backflow assembly testing
☐ Code compliance
☐ Emergency repairs
☐ Preventative maintenance
This shutdown will affect your service on [Date], between the hours of [Start Time] and [End Time].

This work is necessary to maintain safe and reliable water service. If the scheduled time poses a significant disruption to your operations, rescheduling may be possible. To request a postponement, please contact [Water System Contact Name] at [Phone Number] no later than [Date].

We appreciate your understanding and cooperation. For further questions or concerns, feel free to contact our office at [Phone Number].

Sincerely,
[CCCP Coordinator Name and Signature]
City of Porterville,
Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator

APPENDIX F
Customer Complaint Form
City of Porterville
Water Quality/Consumer Complaint Report Form
Instructions:

This form is provided to guide the utility while evaluating water quality data or consumer complaints.

Complaint is based on: ☐ Quality ☐ Quantity ☐ Color ☐ Odor ☐ Other:

What is the water quality complaint?
What are the specifics of the color, odor,
pressure, or taste associated with the
complaint?
Do other consumers have the same complaint?
Are the unusual water quality observations
sporadic over a wide area, or are they clustered
in a particular area?
What is the extent of the area? ☐ A pressure zone ☐ A
neighborhood ☐ A city block ☐
A street ☐ A building
Based on recent complaints, does the unusual water quality appear to be part of a trend (i.e., occurring over several days or longer)?
Internal Questions for System Operators:

What is the baseline of
“normal” water quality
for…?
Quality:

Quantity:

Color:

Odor:

Have there been any operational changes at the plant or in the affected area of the system?
☐ Yes
☐ No
Has there been any flushing or distribution system maintenance in the affected area?
☐ Yes
☐ No
Has there been any repair or construction in the area that could impact water quality?
☐ Yes
☐ No
Does a cross-connection control device protect the property? ☐ Yes
☐ No
Name of person completing form: Date/time:

Name of person reviewing complaint: Date/time:

What was the outcome? Date/time:

APPENDIX G
Backflow Incident Report Form
Backflow Incident Report Form
City of Porterville
Backflow incident Report
Instructions:

This form is provided to assist in documenting a backflow event and a remediation course
Backflow is suspected based
on:
☐ Quality ☐ Taste ☐ Color ☐ Odor ☐ Other:

Location of Origin
What are the specifics of the color, odor,
pressure, or taste associated with the
complaint?
Do other consumers have the same complaint?
Are the unusual water quality observations
sporadic over a wide area, or are they clustered
in a particular area?
Based on recent complaints, does the unusual
water quality appear to be part of a trend (i.e.,
occurring over several days or longer)?
☐ Yes
☐ No
What is the extent of the area? ☐ A pressure zone ☐ A
neighborhood ☐ A city block ☐
A street ☐ A building
Specific Actions
Actions Taken
Backflow Prevention
Assembly Present?
If yes, identify
make/model and
location
☐ Yes
☐ No
If there is a backflow
prevention assembly,
when was it tested last?
Tester’s name and
license #?
☐ Yes
☐ No
Type of Hazard? ☐ Health/Contamination
☐ Non-health / Pollution
Agencies/people
notified?
Identify agencies/names
☐ Yes
☐ No
Identify Follow Up
Actions Taken
Name of the person investigating incident: Date/time:

Supervisor Date/time:

APPENDIX H
City of Porterville Municipal Code: Resolution NO. 9615 Cross-Connection and Backflow Preventions

Attachment 1

RECORD OF BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES & DEVICES
State Water Resources Control Board
Cross-Connection Control
Policy Handbook
Standards and Principles for California’s
Public Water Systems
Adopted: December 19, 2023
Effective: July 1, 2024
Amended: June 17, 2025
California Environmental Protection Agency
i
Table of Contents
Acronyms and Abbreviations...................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 – Policy Overview...................................................................................................... 2

1.1 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2

1.2 Applicability ...................................................................................................................... 2

1.3 Policy Development Background and Legal Authorities.................................................... 2

1.3.1 California Safe Drinking Water Act ............................................................................. 2 Chapter 2 – Background on Backflow Protection and Cross-Connection Control....................... 6

2.1 What is a Cross-Connection? ........................................................................................... 6

2.2 Purpose of a Cross-Connection Control Program............................................................. 7

2.3 Notes on Applicability of the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook ........................ 7 Chapter 3 – Standards for Backflow Protection and Cross-Connection Control.........................10 Article 1 – Definitions and General Requirements .................................................................10

3.1.1 Definitions .................................................................................................................10

3.1.2 Applicability ...............................................................................................................14

3.1.3 Program for Public Water System Cross-Connection Control....................................14

3.1.4 Plan for Public Water System Cross-Connection Control ..........................................16 Article 2 – Hazard Assessments and Required Protection.....................................................19

3.2.1 Hazard Assessments ................................................................................................19

3.2.2 Backflow Protection Required ...................................................................................20 Article 3 – Backflow Prevention Assemblies ..........................................................................23

3.3.1 Standards for Types of Backflow Protection..............................................................23

3.3.2 Installation Criteria for Backflow Protection ...............................................................23

3.3.3 Field Testing and Repair of Backflow Prevention Assemblies and Air Gap Inspection ..........................................................................................................................................24 Article 4 – Backflow Prevention Assembly Testers and Cross-Connection Control Specialists ..............................................................................................................................................26

3.4.1 Backflow Prevention Assembly Tester Certification...................................................26

3.4.2 Cross-Connection Control Specialist Certification .....................................................30 Article 5 – Recordkeeping, Backflow Incident Response, and Notification .............................33

3.5.1 Recordkeeping..........................................................................................................33

3.5.2 Backflow Incident Response Procedure ....................................................................33

3.5.3 Backflow Incident Notification....................................................................................34 Appendix...................................................................................................................................36 ii
Appendix
Appendix A: Assembly Bills 1671 (2017, Chapter 533) and 1180 (2019, Chapter 455) Appendix B: ASME A112.1.2-2012(R2017) Table 1, Minimum Air Gaps for Generally used Plumbing Fixtures, page 4
Appendix C: Backflow Prevention Assembly Diagrams
Appendix D: High Hazard Premises
Appendix E: General Range of Knowledge for Cross-Connection Control Specialists Appendix F: Example Backflow Incident Reporting Form
Appendix G: Related Statutes and Regulations
1 Acronyms and Abbreviations
As used in this policy, acronyms and abbreviations reference the following:

Acronym or Abbreviation Meaning
AB Assembly Bill
AG Air Gap separation
BAT Best Available Technology
BPA Backflow Prevention Assembly
Bus. & Prof. Code Business and Professional Code
CA California
CBSC California Building Standards Commission
CCCPH Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook
CCR California Code of Regulations
C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations
CHSC California Health and Safety Code
Civ. Code Civil Code
DC Double Check valve backflow prevention assembly
DCDA Double Check Detector backflow prevention Assembly DCDA-II Double Check Detector backflow prevention Assembly – type II
Division Division of Drinking Water
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Gov. Code Government Code
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level
Pen. Code Penal Code
PVB Pressure Vacuum Breaker backsiphonage prevention
assembly
PWS Public Water System
RP Reduced Pressure principle backflow prevention
assembly
RPDA Reduced Pressure principle Detector backflow
prevention Assembly
RPDA-II Reduced Pressure principle Detector backflow
prevention Assembly – type II
RW Recycled Water
SB Senate Bill
SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act
State Water Board State Water Resources Control Board
SVB Spill-resistant Pressure Vacuum Breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly
U.S. United States
2 Chapter 1 – Policy Overview

1.1 Objective
The primary objective of the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH) is the protection of public health through the establishment of standards intended to ensure a public water system’s (PWS) drinking water distribution system will not be subject to the backflow of liquids, gases, or other substances. In addition, by providing basic educational information on backflow prevention, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) intends to build a foundation of awareness within the regulated community regarding the importance of backflow protection and crossconnection control, leading to the implementation of a robust cross-connection control program for PWSs.

1.2 Applicability
The CCCPH and its standards apply to all California PWSs, as defined in California’s Health and Safety Code (CHSC, section 116275 (h)). Compliance with this CCCPH is mandatory for all California PWSs.

1.3 Policy Development Background and Legal Authorities Through the adoption of the CCCPH, the State Water Board is exercising its authority, under California’s Safe Drinking Water Act0F
1 (SDWA), to establish enforceable standards
applicable to California’s PWSs. Failure to comply with the CCCPH may result in the issuance of compliance, enforcement, or other corrective actions against a PWS.

1.3.1 California Safe Drinking Water Act
On October 6, 2017, Assembly Bill 1671 (AB 1671) was approved and filed with the Secretary of State (see Appendix A). AB 1671 amended California’s SDWA through the establishment of CHSC sections 116407 and 116555.5. AB 1671 also amended section 116810 of the CHSC, which is briefly discussed in Appendix G.

On October 2, 2019, Assembly Bill 1180 (AB 1180) was approved and filed with the Secretary of State. AB 1180 amended Section 116407 of the CHSC and added section 13521.2 to the Water Code. AB 1180 requires that the CCCPH include provisions for the use of a swivel or changeover device (swivel-ell).
1 CHSC, div. 104, pt. 12, ch. 4, section 116270 et seq. 3 AB 1671 and 1180 established the following:
· The State Water Board must adopt standards for backflow protection and crossconnection control by January 1, 2020. · The State Water Board may establish standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control through the adoption of the CCCPH, with the CCCPH not being subject to the requirements of the CA Administrative Procedure Act.1F 2 · If standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control are established via the CCCPH, the State Water Board must:
o Consult with state and local agencies and persons, identified by the State Water Board, as having expertise on the subject of backflow protection and cross-connection control.
o Hold at least two public hearings before adoption of the CCCPH. o Post the CCCPH on the State Water Board website.
· Upon the effective date of the CCCPH, the previous cross-connection control standards2F
3 become inoperative, and are repealed 90 days later, unless the State Water Board determines not to repeal a specific existing regulation. · A PWS must implement a cross-connection control program that complies with the standards adopted by the State Water Board.
· Use of a swivel-ell must be consistent with any notification and backflow protection provisions contained in the CCCPH.

The development of the CCCPH included consultation with stakeholders, including state and local agencies, on an array of subjects related to cross-connection control, consistent with the statutory mandate, as well as consideration of input from other stakeholders and the general public in a February 20, 2020 workshop.

Prior to adoption of the CCCPH, in accordance with the statutory mandate, the State Water Board held two public hearings - one on April 27, 2021, and the other on December 5, 2022. A Board Workshop was held on October 18, 2023.

Pursuant to sections 116407 and 116555.5 of the CHSC, the State Water Board chose to adopt standards for backflow protection and cross-connection control through the adoption of this CCCPH, which became effective July 1, 2024.

Aside from the mandates of AB 1671 related to the State Water Board’s need and authority to develop and adopt an enforceable CCCPH, there are long-standing statutory mandates in California’s SDWA concerning backflow protection and crossconnection control, some of which are summarized below. 2 Gov. Code, tit. 2, div. 3, pt. 1, ch. 3.5, section 11340 et seq. 3 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 17, div. 1, ch. 5, subch. 1, grp. 4, arts. 1 & 2, section 7583 et seq. 4 · The State Water Board is required to adopt regulations for the control of crossconnections that it determines to be necessary for ensuring PWSs “distribute a reliable and adequate supply of pure, wholesome, potable, and healthy water.” (CHSC section 116375, subd. (c).)
· Any person who owns a PWS is required to ensure that the distribution system will not be subject to backflow under normal operating conditions. (CHSC section 116555, subd. (a)(2).)
Prior to AB 1671 and the adoption of this CCCPH, California’s regulations pertaining to cross-connection control were set forth in regulations in CCR Title 17,3F 4 which were
adopted in 1987 with minor revisions in 2000. Although still protective to public health, the CCR Title 17 cross-connection regulations required updating as both the drinking water and cross-connection control industries had evolved. This CCCPH updates those regulations, which as previously noted are no longer operative following the adoption of the CCCPH.

The State Water Board may update its standards for backflow protection and crossconnection control through revisions of the CCCPH. Prior to adopting substantive revisions to the CCCPH, the State Water Board will consult with state and local agencies and persons identified as having expertise on the subject by the State Water Board, and the State Water Board will hold at least one public hearing to consider public comments.
4 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 17, div. 1, ch. 5, subch. 1, grp. 4, arts. 1 & 2, section 7583 et seq. 5 This page intentionally left blank
6 Chapter 2 – Background on Backflow Protection
and Cross-Connection Control

2.1 What is a Cross-Connection?
A cross-connection is an interconnection between a potable water supply and a nonpotable source via any actual or potential connection or structural arrangement between a PWS and any source or distribution system containing liquid, gas, or other substances not from an approved water supply. Bypass arrangements, jumper connections, removable sections, improperly installed swivel or change-over devices and other temporary or permanent devices through which, or because of which backflow can occur are considered to be cross-connections.4F
5 The CCCPH includes acceptable
installation criteria for swivel-ell and other types of backflow prevention assemblies (BPAs) to prevent backflow.

Backflow is the undesired or unintended reversal of flow of water and/or other liquids, gases, or other substances into a PWS’s distribution system or approved water supply.

The presence of a cross-connection represents a location in a distribution system through which backflow of contaminants or pollutants can occur. Backflow occurs when a non-potable source is at a greater pressure than the potable water distribution system.

Backflow can occur from either backsiphonage or backpressure. Backsiphonage occurs when a non-potable source enters the drinking water supply due to negative (i.e., sub-atmospheric) distribution system pressure. Backpressure occurs when the pressure from a non-potable source exceeds the pressure in the potable water distribution system.

Backsiphonage may be caused by a variety of circumstances, such as main breaks, flushing, pump failure, or emergency firefighting water demand. Backpressure may occur when heating, cooling, waste disposal, or industrial manufacturing systems are connected to potable supplies and the pressure in the external system exceeds the pressure in the distribution system. Both situations act to change the direction of water, which normally flows from the distribution system to the customer, so that non-potable substances from industrial, commercial, or residential premises flows back into the distribution system through a cross-connection.

Cross-connections are not limited to industrial or commercial facilities. Submerged inlets are found on many common plumbing fixtures and are sometimes necessary features of the fixtures if they are to function properly. Examples of this type of design are siphon-jet urinals or water closets, flushing rim slop sinks, and dental cuspidors. 5 California Department of Health Services (DHS), Public Water Supply Branch. (1988). Guidance Manual for cross connection Control Program (Green Manual). California Department of Health Services. 7 Older bathtubs and lavatories may have supply inlets below the flood level rims, but modern sanitary design has minimized or eliminated this cross-connection in new fixtures. Chemical and industrial process vats sometimes have submerged inlets where the water pressure is used as an aid in diffusion, dispersion and agitation of the vat contents. Even though a supply pipe may be installed above a vat, backsiphonage can still occur. Siphon action has been shown to raise a liquid in a pipe such as water almost 34 feet. Some submerged inlets are difficult to control, including those which are not apparent until a significant change in water level occurs or where a supply may be conveniently extended below the liquid surface by means of a hose or auxiliary piping. A submerged inlet may be created in numerous ways, and its detection may be difficult.

Chemical and biological contaminants have caused illness and deaths during known incidents of backflow, with contamination affecting several service connections, and the number of incidents reported is believed to be a small percentage of the total number of backflow incidents that actually occur. The public health risk from cross-connections and backflow is a function of a variety of factors including cross-connection and backflow occurrence and type and amount of contaminants.

2.2 Purpose of a Cross-Connection Control Program
The purpose of a cross-connection control program is to prevent the occurrence of backflow into a PWS’s distribution system in order to protect customers from contamination or pollution from any on-site hazards. Properly installed and maintained BPAs, devices or methods provide protection against the threat posed by many conditions typically found on a user’s premise.

The use of approved BPAs ensures that the appropriate performance evaluation of the assembly was conducted. It is important and required by the CCCPH to select and properly install an approved BPA that is capable of protecting the distribution system from the hazard identified. The success of a program depends on individuals that are knowledgeable about cross-connection control to identify actual and potential hazards, apply principles of backflow protection and prevention, and implement cross-connection control policies and procedures. A successful program will have ongoing surveillance of a PWS to ensure BPAs, devices or methods are working, and identify new hazards or changes in the distribution system. Certified specialists are needed to properly evaluate the degree of hazard that exists in the distribution system. Hazards typically identified in distribution systems along with the required level of protection are specified in Chapter 3 of the CCCPH.

2.3 Notes on Applicability of the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook
The CCCPH provides the basis for regulating the use and management of crossconnection control programs and BPAs in PWSs, and related requirements for supporting programs and policies. Activities or uses outside of the scope of the 8 authority of the State Water Board to regulate PWSs are not regulated by the CCCPH, including California Plumbing Code requirements and definitions not related to PWSs.

Recycled water cross-connection control installations and programs for the purposes of protecting the recycled water supply are not regulated by the CCCPH, although a PWS that uses recycled water is regulated by the CCCPH to ensure that a PWS’s drinking water system has adequate backflow protection from a recycled water system.

Water systems that do not meet the definition of a PWS (e.g. “State Small Water Systems” under CCR Title 22, Article 3) are not regulated by the CCCPH, although they may need to comply with the California Plumbing Code, local health agencies, and other laws or entities.

Transient noncommunity and nontransient noncommunity systems are PWSs and must comply with both the California Plumbing Code and CCCPH. The California Plumbing Code and the CCCPH will overlap in protection of these user premises. To ensure compliance, these noncommunity water systems may need to have internal crossconnection control programs within the user premises.

Noncommunity water systems must have the ability to enforce backflow protection within the premises. Compliance with the California Plumbing Code can be verified by the PWS and used for compliance with the CCCPH. Compliance with the CCCPH is documented through the hazard assessment and maintenance of an inventory of fieldtestable BPAs and methods. Annual field testing of BPAs is required. Where the minimum backflow protection differs between the California Plumbing Code and the CCCPH, the more protective minimum protection will be required. 9 This page intentionally left blank
10 Chapter 3 – Standards for Backflow Protection
and Cross-Connection Control
Article 1 – Definitions and General Requirements

3.1.1 Definitions
The following definitions apply to the terms used in the CCCPH:
“Air-gap separation” or “AG” means a physical vertical separation of at least two (2) times the effective opening, as defined in section 207.0 of the California Plumbing Code, between the free-flowing discharge end of a potable water supply pipeline and the flood level of an open or non-pressurized receiving vessel, and in no case less than one (1) inch.
“Approved water supply” means a water source that has been approved by the State Water Board for domestic use in a public water system and designated as such in a domestic water supply permit issued pursuant to section 116525 of the CHSC. “Auxiliary water supply” means a source of water, other than an approved water supply, that is either used or equipped, or can be equipped, to be used as a water supply and is located on the premises of, or available to, a water user. “Backflow” means an undesired or unintended reversal of flow of water and/or other liquids, gases, or other substances into a public water system’s distribution system or approved water supply.
“Backflow prevention assembly” or “BPA” means a mechanical assembly designed and constructed to prevent backflow, such that while in-line it can be maintained and its ability to prevent backflow, as designed, can be field tested, inspected and evaluated.
“Backflow prevention assembly tester” means a person who is certified as a backflow prevention assembly tester.
“Community water system” means a public water system that serves at least 15 service connections used by yearlong residents or regularly serves at least 25 yearlong residents of the area served by the system.
“Contact hour” means not less than 50 minutes of a continuing education course. “Continuing education course” means a presentation or training that transmits information related to cross-connection control programs and backflow prevention and protection.
11 “Cross-connection” means any actual or potential connection or structural arrangement between a public water system, including a piping system connected to the public water system and located on the premises of a water user or available to the water user, and any source or distribution system containing liquid, gas, or other substances not from an approved water supply.
“Cross-connection control specialist” means a person who is certified as a crossconnection control specialist. “Distribution system” has the same meaning as defined in section 63750.50 of CCR, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 2.
“Double check detector backflow prevention assembly” or “DCDA” means a double check valve backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass with a water meter and double check backflow prevention assembly, with the bypass’s water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. This type of assembly may only be used to isolate low hazard cross-connections. See Diagram 1, Appendix C.
“Double check detector backflow prevention assembly – type II” or “DCDA-II” means a double check valve backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass around the second check, with the bypass having a single check valve and a water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. This type of assembly may only be used to isolate low hazard cross-connections. See Diagram 2, Appendix C. “Double check valve backflow prevention assembly” or “DC” means an assembly consisting of two independently-acting internally-loaded check valves, with tightly closing shut-off valves located at each end of the assembly (upstream and downstream of the two check valves) and fitted with test cocks that enable accurate field testing of the assembly. This type of assembly may only be used to isolate low hazard crossconnections. See Diagram 3, Appendix C. “Existing public water system” or “existing PWS” means a public water system initially permitted on or before July 1, 2024 as a public water system by the State Water Board.
“Hazard Assessment” means an evaluation of a user premises designed to evaluate the types and degrees of hazard at a user’s premises. “High hazard cross-connection” means a cross-connection that poses a threat to the potability or safety of the public water supply. Materials entering the public water supply through a high hazard cross-connection are contaminants or health hazards.

See Appendix D for some examples.
12 “Low hazard cross-connection” means a cross-connection that has been found to not pose a threat to the potability or safety of the public water supply but may adversely affect the aesthetic quality of the potable water supply. Materials entering the public water supply through a low hazard cross-connection are pollutants or non-health hazards.
“New public water system” or “new PWS” means a public water system permitted after July 1, 2024 as a public water system by the State Water Board. A new public water system includes a public water system receiving a new permit because of a change in ownership.
“Noncommunity water system” means a public water system that is not a community water system.
“Nontransient noncommunity water system” means a public water system that is not a community water system and that regularly serves at least 25 of the same persons over six months per year.
“Premises containment” means protection of a public water system’s distribution system from backflow from a user’s premises through the installation of one or more air gaps or BPAs, installed as close as practical to the user’s service connection, in a manner that isolates the water user’s water supply from the public water system’s distribution system.
“Pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly” or “PVB” means an assembly with an independently-acting internally-loaded check valve and an independently-acting loaded air inlet valve located on the discharge side of the check valve; with test cocks and tightly closing shutoff valves located at each end of the assembly that enable accurate field testing of the assembly. This type of assembly may only be used for protection from backsiphonage and is not to be used to protect from backpressure. See Diagram 4, Appendix C.
“Public water system” or “PWS” has the same meaning as defined in section 116275(h) of the CHSC.
“Recycled Water" is a wastewater which as a result of treatment is suitable for uses other than potable use.
“Reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly” or “RP” means an assembly with two independently acting internally-loaded check valves, with a hydraulically operating mechanically independent differential-pressure relief valve located between the check valves and below the upstream check valve. The assembly shall have shut-off valves located upstream and downstream of the two check-valves, and test cocks to enable accurate field testing of the assembly. See Diagram 5, Appendix C.
13 “Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly” or “RPDA” means a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass with a water meter and reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly, with the bypass’s water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. See Diagram 6, Appendix C.
“Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly – type II” or “RPDA-II” means a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly that includes a bypass around the second check, with the bypass having a single check valve and a water meter accurately registering flow rates up to two gallons per minute and visually showing a registration for all rates of flow. See Diagram 7, Appendix C. “Spill-resistant pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly” or “SVB” means an assembly with an independently-acting internally-loaded check valve and an independently-acting loaded air inlet valve located on the discharge side of the check valve; with shutoff valves at each end and a test cock and bleed/vent port, to enable accurate field testing of the assembly. This type of assembly may only be used for protection from backsiphonage and is not to be used to protect from backpressure. See Diagram 8, Appendix C.
“State Water Board”, unless otherwise specified, means the State Water Resources Control Board or the local primacy agency having been delegated the authority to enforce the requirements of the CCCPH by the State Water Resources Control Board. “Swivel-Ell” means a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly combined with a changeover piping configuration (swivel-ell connection) designed and constructed pursuant to this Chapter. See design and construction criteria, as well as Diagrams 9a and 9b, Appendix C.
“Transient noncommunity water system” means a noncommunity water system that does not regularly serve at least 25 of the same persons over six months per year. “User premises” means the property under the ownership or control of a water user and is served, or is readily capable of being served, with water via a service connection with a public water system.
“User’s service connection” means either the point where a water user’s piping is connected to a water system or the point in a water system where the approved water supply can be protected from backflow using an air gap or backflow prevention assembly.
“User Supervisor” means a person designated by a water user to oversee a water use site and responsible for the avoidance of cross-connections. 14 “Water supplier” means a person who owns or operates a public water system. “Water user” means a person or entity who is authorized by the PWS to receive water.

3.1.2 Applicability
A public water system (PWS) must comply with the requirements of the CCCPH.

3.1.3 Program for Public Water System Cross-Connection Control (a) A PWS must protect the public water supply through implementation and enforcement of a cross-connection control program. Unless otherwise specified by this Chapter or directed by the State Water Board, a PWS may implement its crossconnection control program, in whole or in part, either directly or by way of contract or agreement with another party. The PWS, however, shall not be responsible for abatement of cross-connections which may exist within a user's premises. The crossconnection control program must include at a minimum the following elements:
(1) Operating rules or ordinances – Each PWS must have operating rules, ordinances, by-laws or a resolution to implement the cross-connection program.

The PWS must have legal authority to implement corrective actions in the event a water user fails to comply in a timely manner with the PWS’s provisions regarding the installation, inspection, field testing, or maintenance of BPAs required pursuant to this Chapter. Such corrective actions must include the PWS’s ability to perform at least one of the following:
(A) deny or discontinue water service to a water user,
(B) install, inspect, field test, and/or maintain a BPA at a water user’s premises, or
(C) otherwise address in a timely manner a failure to comply with the cross-connection control program.
(2) Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator – The PWS must designate at least one individual involved in the development of and be responsible for the reporting, tracking, and other administration duties of its cross-connection control program. For PWS with 3,000 service connections or more the Cross-Connection Control Program Coordinator must be a crossconnection control specialist. (3) Hazard Assessments – The PWS must survey its service area and conduct hazard assessments per Article 2 of this Chapter that identifies actual or potential cross-connection hazards, degree of hazard, and any backflow protection needed.
(4) Backflow Prevention – The PWS must ensure that actual and potential cross-connections are eliminated when possible or controlled by the installation of approved BPAs or AG’s consistent with the requirements of the Article 3 of this Chapter.
15 (5) Certified Backflow Prevention Assembly Testers and Certified CrossConnection Control Specialists – The PWS must ensure all BPA testers and cross-connection control specialists used are certified per Article 4 of this Chapter.
(6) Backflow Prevention Assembly Testing – The PWS must develop and implement a procedure for ensuring all BPAs are field tested, inspected, and maintained and AG’s are inspected and maintained in accordance with CCCPH section 3.3.3.
(7) Recordkeeping – The PWS must develop and implement a recordkeeping system in accordance with CCCPH section 3.5.1.
(8) Backflow Incident Response, Reporting and Notification – The PWS must develop and implement procedures for investigating and responding to suspected or actual backflow incidents in accordance with Article 5 of this chapter.
(9) Public Outreach and Education – The PWS must implement a crossconnection control public outreach and education program element that includes educating staff, customers, and the community about backflow protection and cross-connection control. The PWS may implement this requirement through a variety of methods which may include providing information on cross-connection control and backflow protection in periodic water bill inserts, pamphlet distribution, new customer documentation, email, and consumer confidence reports.
(10) Local Entity Coordination – The PWS must coordinate with applicable local entities that are involved in either cross-connection control or public health protection to ensure hazard assessments can be performed, appropriate backflow protection is provided, and provide assistance in the investigation of backflow incidents. Local entities may include but are not limited to plumbing, permitting, or health officials, law enforcement, fire departments, maintenance, and public and private entities.
(b) The cross-connection control program must be developed in consultation with a cross-connection control specialist if:
(1) The PWS has 1,000 or more service connections, or
(2) required by the State Water Board.
(c) A PWS must have at least one cross-connection control specialist as a permanent or contracted employee of the PWS, and that specialist, or their designee, must be able to be contacted within one hour, if:
(1) The PWS has 3,000 or more service connections, or
(2) the PWS has less than 3,000 service connections and is directed by the State Water Board based on hazard assessments conducted pursuant to CCCPH section 3.2.1. or the PWS’s history of backflow incidents. 16 3.1.4 Plan for Public Water System Cross-Connection Control (a) After adoption of the CCCPH, each PWS must submit a written Cross-Connection Control Plan for State Water Board review in accordance with the following schedule:
(1) An Existing PWS must submit the Cross-Connection Control Plan no later than 12 months after the effective date of the CCCPH.
(2) A new PWS must submit the Cross-Connection Control Plan for review and approval prior to issuance of a domestic water supply permit. (3) A PWS may submit a written request to the State Water Board for an extension of the deadline for submittal of its initial Cross-Connection Control Plan. The PWS’s application must include a written description of the need for an extension. Approval of an extension will be at the sole discretion of the State Water Board.
(b) The Cross-Connection Control Plan for a community water system must include, at a minimum, the following cross-connection control program procedures and documentation:
(1) a description of how the community water system will achieve and maintain compliance with each requirement in this Chapter;
(2) a description of the process, personnel, and timeframes for completing initial and ongoing hazard assessments pursuant to CCCPH section 3.2.1; (3) a description of the legal authority pursuant to CCCPH section 3.1.3 to implement corrective actions in the event a water user fails to comply in a timely manner with the provisions of the PWS’s cross-connection control program; (4) a description of the process and timeframes for ensuring each BPA is inspected and field tested, and AG is inspected, at a frequency no less than required by this Chapter;
(5) a description of the process and timeframe for ensuring each non-testable backflow preventer that is under the PWS ownership or administration is installed and maintained according to the California Plumbing Code; (6) a description of the process for ensuring individuals field testing and inspecting BPAs are no less qualified than required by this Chapter, including but not limited to confirmation of the individual’s:
(A) certification as a backflow prevention assembly tester, (B) field test kit or gage equipment accuracy verification, and (C) BPA field test result reports;
(7) a description of the procedures and timeframes of activities for responding to backflow incidents, including notification of customers, and reporting of backflow incidents pursuant to CCCPH section 3.5.2;
(8) contact information for cross-connection control personnel including any cross-connection control program coordinator and specialist; (9) a description of the tracking system that maintains current and relevant information, including:
17 (A) recordkeeping information required pursuant to CCCPH section 3.5.1, (B) location and type of each BPA, and
(C) highest threat potential hazard from which a given BPA is protecting the public water system distribution system;
(10) for user supervisors, if used, the required information pursuant to CCCPH section 3.2.2 (f);
(11) the corrective actions, including timeframes for the corrective actions, that a community water system will implement when:
(A) a cross-connection exists and the BPA installed is not commensurate with the user premises’ hazard or no BPA has been installed, or (B) a BPA needs to be replaced or maintained;
(12) a description of the public outreach and education program to comply with CCCPH section 3.1.3(a)(9); and
(13) the procedures for coordination with local entities (c) The Cross-Connection Control Plan for a noncommunity water system must include, at a minimum, the following cross-connection control program procedures and documentation:
(1) a description of how the noncommunity water system will achieve and maintain compliance with each requirement in this Chapter that is applicable to the noncommunity water system;
(2) a description of the process, personnel, and timeframes for completing initial and ongoing hazard assessments pursuant to CCCPH section 3.2.1; (3) a description of the legal authority pursuant to CCCPH section 3.1.3 to implement corrective actions in the event a water user fails to comply in a timely manner with the provisions of the PWS’s cross-connection control program; (4) a description of the process and timeframes for ensuring each BPA is inspected and field tested and AG is inspected, at a frequency no less than required by this Chapter;
(5) a description of the process and timeframe for ensuring each non-testable backflow preventer for internal protection that is under the PWS ownership or administration is installed and maintained according to the California Plumbing Code;
(6) a description of the process for ensuring individuals field testing and inspecting BPAs are no less qualified than required by this Chapter, including but not limited to confirmation of the individual’s:
(A) certification as a backflow prevention assembly tester, (B) field test kit or gage equipment accuracy verification, and (C) BPA field test result reports;
18 (7) a description of the procedures and timeframes of activities for responding to backflow incidents, including notification of customers, and reporting of backflow incidents pursuant to CCCPH section 3.5.2;
(8) contact information for cross-connection control personnel including the cross-connection control program coordinator;
(9) maintaining a tracking system with current and relevant information, including:
(A) recordkeeping information required pursuant to CCCPH section 3.5.1, (B) location and type of each BPA,
(C) location and type of each non-testable backflow preventer used for internal protection in accordance with the California Plumbing Code, if applicable, and
(D) potential hazard from which a BPA is protecting the public water system distribution system;
(10) for user supervisors, if used, the required information pursuant to CCCPH section 3.2.2(f);
(11) the corrective actions, including timeframes for the corrective actions, that a noncommunity water system will implement when:
(A) a cross-connection exists and the BPA installed is not commensurate with the user premises’ hazard or no BPA has been installed, or (B) a BPA or non-testable backflow preventer needs to be replaced or maintained;
(12) a description of the public outreach and education program to comply with CCCPH section 3.1.3(a)(9); and,
(13) the procedures for coordination with local entities (e.g., local health departments with internal cross-connection control programs, building officials, plumbing officials, etc.).
(d) A PWS must ensure its Cross-Connection Control Plan is, at all times, representative of the current operation of its Cross-Connection Control program. The PWS must make its Cross-Connection Control Plan available to the State Water Board for review upon request. If a PWS makes a substantive revision to its CrossConnection Control Plan, the PWS must submit the revised Cross-Connection Control Plan to the State Water Board for review.
19 Article 2 – Hazard Assessments and Required Protection

3.2.1 Hazard Assessments
(a) To evaluate the potential for backflow into the PWS, each community water system must conduct an initial hazard assessment of the user premises within its service area and each noncommunity water system must conduct an initial hazard assessment of its water distribution system. The hazard assessment must consider:
(1) The existence of cross-connections;
(2) the type and use of materials handled and present, or likely to be, on the user premises;
(3) the degree of piping system complexity and accessibility; (4) access to auxiliary water supplies, pumping systems, or pressure systems; (5) distribution system conditions that increase the likelihood of a backflow event (e.g., hydraulic gradient differences impacted by main breaks and high waterdemand situations, multiple service connections that may result in flow-through conditions, etc.);
(6) user premises accessibility;
(7) any previous backflow incidents on the user premises; and (8) the requirements and information provided in the CCCPH. (b) Each hazard assessment must identify the degree of hazard to the PWS’s distribution system as either a high hazard cross-connection, a low hazard crossconnection, or having no hazard. Examples of some high hazard cross-connection activities may be found in Appendix D.
(c) The hazard assessment must determine whether an existing BPA, if any, provides adequate protection based on the degree of hazard.
(d) Hazard assessments completed prior to the adoption of the CCCPH may be considered as an initial hazard assessment provided that such hazard assessments and associated backflow protection provide protection consistent with the CCCPH and the PWS describes their review of these assessments in the Cross-Connection Control Plan required in CCCPH section 3.1.4.
(e) Subsequent to the initial hazard assessment described in subsection (a), a community water system must perform a hazard assessment under the following criteria:
(1) if a user premises changes account holder, excluding single-family residences;
(2) if a user premises is newly or re-connected to the PWS; (3) if evidence exists of changes in the activities or materials on a user’s premises;
(4) if backflow from a user’s premises occurs;
(5) periodically, as identified in the PWS’s Cross-Connection Control Plan required pursuant to CCCPH section 3.1.4.;
20 (6) if the State Water Board requests a hazard assessment of a user’s premises; or
(7) if the PWS concludes an existing hazard assessment may no longer accurately represent the degree of hazard.
(f) Noncommunity water systems must conduct an initial or follow-up hazard assessment within three years of the effective date of the CCCPH. (g) Noncommunity water system must conduct a follow-up hazard assessment of its water distribution system if any changes are made that could result in a crossconnection or any backflow incidents occur. (h) A cross-connection control specialist must review or conduct each initial and followup hazard assessment pursuant to this section and make a written finding that, in the specialist’s judgment based on cross-connection control principles, the PWS’s hazard assessment properly identified all hazards at the time of the assessment, the appropriate degree of hazards, and the corresponding backflow protection.

3.2.2 Backflow Protection Required
(a) A PWS must ensure its distribution system is protected from backflow from identified hazards through the proper installation, continued operation, and field testing of an approved BPA (see Article 3 for installation and approved BPA criteria). When a DC is required or referenced in the CCCPH, a DCDA or DCDA-II type of assembly may be substituted if appropriate. When an RP is required or referenced in the CCCPH, an RPDA or RPDA-II type of assembly may be substituted if appropriate. (b) The BPA installed must be no less protective than that which is commensurate with the degree of hazard at a user premises, as specified in this Chapter and as determined based on the results of the hazard assessment conducted pursuant to CCCPH section

3.2.1. (c) Unless specified otherwise in this Chapter, a PWS must, at all times, protect its distribution system from high hazard cross-connections (see Appendix D for examples), through premises containment, through the use of AG(s) or RP(s). (1) Following State Water Board review and approval, a PWS may implement an alternate method of premises containment in lieu of a required AG provided that the proposed alternative would not increase the level of risk to protection of public health.
(2) Following State Water Board review and approval, a PWS may accept internal protection in lieu of containment when premises containment is not feasible.
21 (d) Except as otherwise allowed or prohibited in statute or in CCR Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3, a swivel-ell may be used instead of an AG for premises containment protection when temporarily substituting tertiary recycled water use areas with potable water from a PWS if all the following criteria are met:
(1) the swivel-ell is approved by the State Water Board; (2) the PWS has a cross-connection control program, required pursuant to CCCPH section 3.1.3, and the use and operation of the swivel-ell is described in the Cross-Connection Control Plan required pursuant to CCCPH section 3.1.4; (3) the design and construction-related requirements of the swivel-ell adheres to the criteria in Appendix C;
(4) at least every 12 months, inspections are performed and documented to confirm ongoing compliance with the design and construction-related requirements in Appendix C;
(5) the RP used in conjunction with the swivel-ell is field tested and found to be functioning properly:
(A) immediately upon each switchover to potable water use, a visual inspection of the RP must be completed
(B) within 72 hours of each switchover to potable water use, a field test must be completed, and
(C) at least every 12 weeks the use site is supplied with potable water; and
(6) there is a legally binding agreement between the PWS and the entity supplying the recycled water, signed by those with relevant legal authority, that includes the following requirements:
(A) The State Water Board will be notified within 24 hours of all switchovers to or from potable water, will be given an estimate of the timeframe until the next switchover, and will be provided the results of the field testing required in paragraph (5);
(B) a trained representative of the PWS be present to supervise each switchover; and
(C) within seven days of each switchover, if requested by the State Water Board, the PWS will submit a written report describing compliance with this subsection, as well as potable and recycled water usage information. (e) Except as noted below, a PWS must ensure its distribution system is protected with no less than DC protection for a user premises with a fire protection system within ten years of the effective date of the CCCPH.
(1) A high hazard cross-connection fire protection system, including but not limited to fire protection systems that may utilize chemical addition (e.g., wetting agents, foam, anti-freeze, corrosion inhibitor, etc.) or an auxiliary water supply, must have no less than RP protection.
22 (2) For existing fire protection systems that do not meet Section 3.2.2 (e)(3) or cannot install DC protection within ten years of the effective date of the CCCPH, a PWS may propose in the cross-connection control plan submitted for CCCPH Section 3.1.4:
(A) an alternative date; or
(B) an alternative method of backflow protection that provides at least the same level of protection to public health.
(3) A BPA is not necessary for a low hazard fire protection system on a residential user premises if the following criteria are satisfied:
(A) the user premises has only one service connection to the PWS; (B) a single service line onto the user premises exists that subsequently splits on the property for domestic flow and fire protection system flow, such that the fire protection system may be isolated from the rest of the user premises;
(C) a single, water industry standard, water meter is provided to measure combined domestic flow and fire protection system flow; (D) the fire protection system is constructed of piping materials certified as meeting NSF/ANSI Standard 61; and
(E) the fire protection system’s piping is looped within the structure and is connected to one or more routinely used fixtures (such as a water closet) to prevent stagnant water.
(f) The State Water Board and PWS may, at their discretion, require a water user to designate a user supervisor when the user premises has a multi-piping system that conveys various types of fluids and where changes in the piping system are frequently made. If a user supervisor is designated the following is required:
(1) The user supervisor is responsible for the avoidance of cross-connections during the installation, operation and maintenance of the water user’s pipelines and equipment. The user supervisor must be trained on the fluids used and backflow protection for the premise, and must inform the PWS of changes in piping, and maintain current contact information on file with the PWS; and (2) The PWS must include in the Cross-Connection Control Plan required in CCCPH section 3.1.4 the training and qualification requirements for user supervisors, identify the entity that will provide the user supervisor training, and frequency of any necessary recurring training. The training must adequately address the types of hazards and concerns typically found. (g) Facilities producing, treating, storing, or distributing drinking water that are an approved water supply or water recycling plants as defined by CCR Title 22, Section 60301.710 must have proper internal protection from cross-connections to ensure that all drinking water produced and delivered to customers and workers at those facilities is free from unprotected cross-connections.
23 Article 3 – Backflow Prevention Assemblies

3.3.1 Standards for Types of Backflow Protection
(a) The PWS must ensure that each AG used for its Cross-Connection Control Program meets the requirements in Table 1, Minimum Air Gaps for Generally used Plumbing Fixtures, page 4 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) A112.1.2- 2012(R2017) (See Appendix B).
(b) The PWS must ensure that each replaced or newly installed PVB, SVB, DC, and RP for protection of the PWS is approved through both laboratory and field evaluation tests performed in accordance with at least one of the following:
(1) Standards found in Chapter 10 of the Manual of Cross-Connection Control, Tenth Edition, published by the University of Southern California Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research; or
(2) certification requirements for BPAs in the Standards of ASSE International current as of 2022 that include ASSE 1015-2021 for the DC, ASSE 1048-2021 for the DCDA & DCDA-II, ASSE 1013-2021 for the RP, and ASSE 1047-2021 for the RPDA & RPDA-II and must have the 1YT mark.
(c) BPAs must not be modified following approval granted under section 3.3.1 (b). PWS must require BPA testers to notify the PWS if a water user or PWS-owned BPA has been modified from the CCCPH section 3.3.1 (b) approval.

3.3.2 Installation Criteria for Backflow Protection
(a) For AGs, the following is required:
(1) The receiving water container must be located on the water user’s premises at the water user’s service connection unless an alternate location has been approved by the PWS;
(2) all piping between the water user’s service connection and the discharge location of the receiving water container must be above finished grade and be accessible for visual inspection unless an alternative piping configuration is approved by the PWS;
(3) the PWS must ensure that the AG specified in CCCPH section 3.3.1 (a) has been installed; and
(4) any new air gap installation at a user’s service connection must be reviewed and approved by the State Water Board prior to installation. (b) RPs must be installed such that the lowest point of an assembly is a minimum of twelve inches above grade, and, unless an alternative is approved by the PWS, a maximum of thirty-six inches above the finished grade.
(c) DCs installed or replaced after the adoption of the CCCPH must be installed according to CCCPH section 3.3.2 (b). Below ground installation can be considered if approved by the PWS where it determines no alternative options are available. 24 (d) A PVB or SVB must be installed a minimum of twelve inches above all downstream piping and outlets.
(e) SVBs may not be used for premises containment. PVBs may only be used for roadway right of way irrigation systems as premises containment where there is no potential for backpressure.
(f) A RP or DC installed after the adoption of the CCCPH must have a minimum side clearance of twelve inches, except that a minimum side clearance of twenty-four inches must be provided on the side of the assembly that contains the test cocks. The PWS may approve alternate clearances providing that there is adequate clearance for field testing and maintenance.
(g) Backflow protection must be located as close as practical to the water user’s service connection unless one or more alternative locations have been approved by the PWS.

If internal protection is provided in lieu of premises containment, the PWS must obtain access to the user premises and must ensure that the on-site protection meets the requirements of this Chapter for installation, field testing, and inspections. (h) Each BPA and air gap separation must be accessible for field testing, inspection, and maintenance.

3.3.3 Field Testing and Repair of Backflow Prevention Assemblies and Air Gap Inspection
(a) PWS must ensure that all BPAs installed for its Cross-Connection Control Program are field tested following installation, repair, depressurization for winterizing, or permanent relocation. All required field testing must be performed by certified backflow prevention assembly testers.
(b) BPAs must be field tested at least annually. The CCCPH does not preclude a PWS, the State Water Board, or a local health agency from requiring more frequent field testing for premises with high hazard cross-connection or BPA at increased risk of testing failure.
(c) Air-gap separations must be visually inspected at least annually to determine compliance with this Chapter by persons certified as backflow prevention assembly testers or certified as a cross-connection control specialist pursuant to this Chapter. (d) PWS must receive passing field tests before providing continuous service to a water user with a newly installed BPA.
(e) PWS must ensure that BPAs that fail the field test are repaired or replaced within 30 days of notification of the failure. Extensions may be allowed by the PWS if included as part of the Cross-Connection Control Plan.
25 (f) PWS must require backflow prevention assembly testers to notify the PWS as soon as possible within 24 hours if a backflow incident or an unprotected cross-connection is observed at the BPA or prior to the user premises during field testing. PWS must immediately conduct an investigation and discontinue service to the user premises if a backflow incident is confirmed, and water service must not be restored to that user premises until the PWS receives a confirmation of a passing BPA field test from a backflow prevention assembly tester and the assembly is protecting the PWS. 26 Article 4 – Backflow Prevention Assembly Testers and CrossConnection Control Specialists

3.4.1 Backflow Prevention Assembly Tester Certification (a) A PWS must ensure that each BPA required by this Chapter to protect the public water system is field tested by a person with valid certification from a certifying organization recognized by the State Water Board pursuant to this Article. (b) A State Water Board-recognized organization certifying backflow prevention assembly testers is one that has a certification process that, at a minimum, includes the following:
(1) A timed and proctored written5F
6 exam, using a closed-book, objective grading
format, consisting of no less than 100 questions for initial certification and no less than 50 questions for recertification. A passing score must be achieved by an examinee as a requirement for certification.
(A) Written exam proctors must:

1. not provide an examinee any assistance in answering exam questions, verbal or otherwise; and

2. be impartial.
(B) Passing scores for the written exams are to be determined prior to exam sessions, such that passing a written exam demonstrates sufficient knowledge of subjects associated with the proper field testing of BPAs, including but not limited to:

1. the hydraulics and theory of backflow;

2. California’s laws, regulations, and requirements related to crossconnection control;

3. types of BPA field test equipment and the need to verify accuracy, at least annually and when otherwise necessary, to ensure accuracy of field test results;

4. field test procedures for an RP, RPDA, RPDA-II, DC, DCDA, DCDA-II, PVB, and SVB using the procedures provided in the Manual of Cross-Connection Control, Tenth Edition, published by the University of Southern California Foundation for CrossConnection Control and Hydraulic Research or equivalent;

5. identification of improperly functioning BPAs (i.e., diagnostics or troubleshooting); and

6. recordkeeping and safety.
6 The requirement for a written exam does not preclude using computerized exams. 27 (2) A performance (i.e., hands-on) exam, using a closed-book, objective grading process and the field test procedures in paragraph (1)(B)(4), designed such that passing the performance exam demonstrates proficiency in accurately determining the operating condition of an RP, DC, PVB, and SVB, when properly or improperly functioning, including but not limited to BPAs with leaks in shutoff valves, and failures in check valves, air inlet valves, or relief valves. A passing score must be achieved by an examinee as a requisite for certification. The performance exam process must include the following:
(A) Performance exam proctors must:

1. be certified as a backflow prevention assembly tester pursuant to this Article;

2. evaluate no more than one examinee at a time;

3. not provide an examinee any assistance in answering exam questions, verbal or otherwise;

4. provide no indication an examinee has erred until completion of a BPA field test, at which time only the fact the examinee has erred may be indicated (i.e., not the nature of the error);

5. be impartial and not affiliated with the certifying organization’s preparation of, or preparatory course for (if applicable), the performance exam; and

6. not evaluate an examinee who was trained by the proctor during the six-month period prior to the exam or other conflict of interest. (B) An examinee is considered to have failed a performance exam if the examinee:

1. makes a field test procedure or recording error that could impact an accurate determination of the operating condition of a BPA,

2. completes the BPA performance exam form with an error,

3. is informed of making an error (see subparagraph (A)(4)) and begins the procedure a second time, and

4. errs a second time and completes the BPA performance exam form accordingly.
(3) recertification requirements of no less frequently than every three years which includes both a written and performance exam;
(4) provisions for revocation of a backflow prevention assembly tester’s certification, including but not limited to, revocation for falsifying field test results or field test reports;
28 (5) a website providing public access to the most recent list of backflow prevention assembly testers:
(A) who hold a valid certification from the certifying organization. At a minimum, the list is to include each backflow prevention assembly tester’s last name, first name, certification number, and the date on which each backflow prevention assembly tester’s certification expires; and (B) whose certification was revoked, pursuant to paragraph (4), in the three years preceding the date of the list. At a minimum, the list is to include each backflow prevention assembly tester’s last name, first name, revoked certification number, the date on which each backflow prevention assembly tester’s certification was revoked, and the reason for revocation. (6) as a prerequisite to sections 3.4.1(b)(1) and (b)(2), completion of an instructional training course accepted by the certifying organization6F 7 that covers
the subjects in subsection (1)(B) and is no less than 30 hours in length over no fewer than four days for:
(A) a backflow prevention assembly tester’s initial certification; (B) a backflow prevention assembly tester’s recertification as a result of revocation; or
(7) In lieu of compliance with section 3.4.1(b)(6) a certifying organization may accept two years prior experience in backflow prevention assembly testing. (c) To be recognized by the State Water Board as a certifying organization for backflow prevention assembly testers, a certifying organization shall:
(1) submit an application with the following information to the State Water Board for review:
(A) written documentation of a certification program that includes a process that is no less stringent than the criteria in subsection (b); (B) evidence that the organization’s certification program and exam process has been reviewed, with concerns adequately addressed, by a credentialed psychometrician proficient in the design of objective exams, experienced in the assessment of certification or licensing organizations, and familiar with the application of the requirements of ISO7F 8 /IEC8F
9 17024:

Conformity Assessment- General Requirements for Bodies Operating Certification of Persons; and
7 But not limited only to training provided by the certifying organization or its affiliates. 8 International Organization for Standardization
9 International Electrotechnical Commission
29 (C) a written statement, signed by the certifying organization’s representative(s) having the authority and legal responsibility for operation of the certifying organization, attesting that the certifying organization will implement its certification program in a manner meeting or exceeding the criteria in subsection (b) and consistent with the application submitted to the State Water Board.
(2) adequately address each State Water Board comment and/or question concerning the application, and
(3) receive written acknowledgment from the State Water Board that the application is complete.
(d) A certifying organization, accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in accordance with ISO/IEC 17024, which complies with subsection (b), will be considered to be a State Water Board-recognized certifying organization. Beginning three years after the effective date of the CCCPH, only those testers with a valid certification from an ANSI-accredited certifying organization shall satisfy subsection (a) and certifications obtained by organizations in accordance with subsection (c) will be invalid.
(e) This Article does not preclude a local health agency from maintaining a backflow prevention assembly tester certification program for the field testing of BPAs within the local health agency’s jurisdiction. Accepting a tester certified by a local health agency does not relieve a PWS from meeting the requirements of this Article. (f) This Article does not preclude a PWS from disallowing the use of an individual tester certified pursuant to this Article if the PWS has reason to believe a certified tester may not be proficient in accurately determining the operating condition of BPA, or for any other reason (e.g., fraud, deceit, negligence, misconduct, etc.). A PWS must report any evidence of a tester falsifying reports to that tester’s certifying organization. (g) This Article is effective July 1, 2026.
30 3.4.2 Cross-Connection Control Specialist Certification (a) A PWS must ensure that cross-connection control specialists, used pursuant to the CCCPH, have valid certification from a certifying organization recognized by the State Water Board pursuant to this Article.
(b) A State Water Board-recognized organization certifying cross-connection control specialists is one that has a certification process that, at a minimum, includes the following:
(1) A timed and proctored, written9F
10 exam, using a closed-book, objective grading
format, consisting of no less than 100 questions for certification. A passing score must be achieved by an examinee as a requirement for certification. (A) Written exam proctors must:

1. not provide an examinee any assistance in answering exam questions, verbal or otherwise; and

2. be impartial.
(B) Passing scores for the exams are to be determined prior to exam sessions, such that passing an exam demonstrates sufficient and comprehensive range of knowledge of the subjects provided in Appendix E, as they may relate to cross-connection control and the causes, effects, and prevention of backflow.
(2) recertification requirements of no less frequently than every three years.

Recertification may be done through at least one of the following:
(A) an exam as required by section 3.4.2 (b)(1),
(B) through 12 contact hours from continuing education courses covering material in Appendix E or,
(C) a combination of exam and continuing education contact hours equivalent to (A) or (B);
(3) provisions for revocation of a specialist’s certification, including but not limited to, falsifying information or providing negligent recommendations inconsistent with industry-standard cross-connection control guidelines; (4) a website providing public access to the most recent list of cross-connection control specialists:
(A) who hold a valid certification from the certifying organization. At a minimum, the list is to include each specialist’s last name, first name, certification number, and the date on which each specialist’s certification expires; or
10 The requirement for a written exam does not preclude using computerized exams. 31 (B) whose certification was revoked, pursuant paragraph (3), in the three years preceding the date of the list. At a minimum, the list is to include each specialist’s last name, first name, revoked certification number, the date on which each specialist’s certification was revoked, and the reason for revocation.
(5) initial certification requirements:
(A) a valid backflow prevention assembly tester certification from a certification organization recognized by the State Water Board pursuant to section 3.4.1; and
(B) completion of an instructional training course (acceptable to the certifying organization10F
11) that covers the subjects in Appendix E and is no
less than 30 hours in length over no fewer than five days (inclusive of an exam, if provided). This paragraph does not preclude a certification organization from providing the instructional training course to the public, including certified specialists.
(C) As an alternative to (A) the certifying organization may accept additional instruction in the subject areas of testing, maintaining and repairing BPAs equivalent in length and scope to the requirements in

3.4.1(b)(6).
(D) As an alternative to (A) the certifying organization may accept a minimum of five (5) years documented experience performing crossconnection control specialist duties, as outlined in Appendix E. (c) To be recognized by the State Water Board as a certifying organization for crossconnection control specialists, a certifying organization shall:
(1)submit an application with the following information to the State Water Board for review:
(A) Written documentation of a certification program that includes a process that is no less stringent than the criteria in subsection (b); (B) evidence that the organization’s certification program and exam process has been reviewed, with concerns adequately addressed, by a credentialed psychometrician proficient in the design of objective exams, experienced in the assessment of certification or licensing organizations, and familiar with the application of the requirements of ISO1F 12/IEC12F13 17024:

Conformity Assessment- General Requirements for Bodies Operating Certification of Persons; and
11 But not limited only to training provided by the certifying organization or its affiliates. 12 International Organization for Standardization
13 International Electrotechnical Commission
32 (C) a written statement, signed by the certifying organization’s representative(s) having the authority and legal responsibility for operation of the certifying organization, attesting that the certifying organization will implement its certification program in a manner meeting or exceeding the criteria in subsection (b) and consistent with the application submitted to the State Water Board.
(2) adequately address each State Water Board comment and question concerning the application, and
(3) receive a written acknowledgment from the State Water Board that the application is complete:
(d) A certifying organization, accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in accordance with ISO/IEC 17024, which complies with subsection (b), will be considered to be a State Water Board-recognized certifying organization. Beginning three years after the effective date of the CCCPH, only those specialists with a valid certification from an ANSI-accredited certifying organization shall satisfy subsection (a) and certifications obtained by organizations in accordance with subsection (c) will be invalid.
(e) This Article does not preclude a local health agency from maintaining a crossconnection control specialist certification program for specialists within the local health agency’s jurisdiction. Using a specialist certified by a local health agency does not relieve a PWS from meeting the requirements of this Article. (f) This Article does not preclude a PWS from disallowing the use of an individual crossconnection control specialist certified pursuant to this Article if the PWS has reason to believe a certified specialist may not be proficient in their knowledge of crossconnection control and the causes, effects, and prevention of backflow, or for any other reason (e.g., fraud, deceit, negligence, misconduct, etc.). A PWS must report any evidence of a specialist falsifying reports to that specialist’s certifying organization. (g) This Article is effective July 1, 2026.
33 Article 5 – Recordkeeping, Backflow Incident Response, and Notification

3.5.1 Recordkeeping
(a) Each PWS must maintain the following records:
(1) The two most recent hazard assessments for each user premise, conducted pursuant to CCCPH section 3.2.1 (Hazard Assessment);
(2) for each BPA, the associated hazard or application, location, owner, type, manufacturer and model, size, installation date, and serial number; (3) for each AG installation, the associated hazard or application and the location, owner, and as-built plans of the AG;
(4) results of all BPA field testing, AG inspection, and swivel-ell inspections and field tests for the previous three calendar years, including the name, test date, repair date, and certification number of the backflow prevention assembly tester for each BPA field test and AG and swivel-ell;
(5) repairs made to, or replacement or relocation of, BPAs for the previous three calendar years;
(6) the most current cross-connection tests (e.g. shutdown test, dye test); (7) if a user supervisor is designated for a user premise, the current contact information for the user supervisor and water user, and any applicable training and qualifications as described by CCCPH section 3.2.2(f); (8) descriptions and follow-up actions related to all backflow incidents; (9) if any portion of the cross-connection control program is carried out under contract or agreement, a copy of the current contract or agreement; (10) the current Cross-Connection Control Plan as required in CCCPH section

3.1.4.; and
(11) any public outreach or education materials issued as required in CCCPH section 3.1.3.(a)(9) for the previous three calendar years. (b) All information in subsection (a) must be available to the State Water Board upon request.

3.5.2 Backflow Incident Response Procedure
Each PWS must include backflow incident response procedures in the CrossConnection Control Plan required in CCCPH section 3.1.4. The PWS must describe its procedures for investigating and responding to suspected backflow incidents including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Consideration of complaints or reports of changes in water quality as possible incidents of backflow;
(b) Water quality sampling and pressure recording; and
(c) Documentation of the investigation, and any response and follow-up activities. 34 3.5.3 Backflow Incident Notification
(a) Each PWS must notify the State Water Board and local health agencies of any known or suspected incident of backflow within 24 hours of the determination. If required by the State Water Board, a PWS must issue a Tier 1 public notification pursuant to CCR, Title 22, Section 64463.1.
(b) If required by the State Water Board, the PWS must submit, by a date specified by the State Water Board, a written incident report describing the details and affected area of the backflow incident, the actions taken by the PWS in response to the backflow incident, and the follow up actions to prevent future backflow incidents. The written report must contain, at a minimum, the information requested in Appendix F. 35 This page intentionally left blank
36 Appendix
Appendix A: Assembly Bill 1671 (2017, Chapter 533) and Assembly Bill 1180 (2019, Chapter 455).

Appendix B: ASME A112.1.2-2012(R2017) Table 1, Minimum Air Gaps for Generally used Plumbing Fixtures, page 4
Appendix C: Backflow Prevention Assembly Diagrams
Appendix D: High Hazard Premises
Appendix E: General Range of Knowledge for Cross-Connection Control Specialists Appendix F: Example Backflow Incident Reporting Form
Appendix G: Related Statutes and Regulations
This page intentionally left blank
Appendix A
Assembly Bill 1671 (2017, Chapter 533)
Assembly Bill 1180 (2019, Chapter 455)
This page intentionally left blank
PLACEHOLDER – ADD PDFs HERE OF AB 1671 (3 PAGES) AND AB 1180 (3 PAGES) AND DELETE THIS PAGE. NEXT PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK.

This page intentionally left blank
Appendix B
ASME A112.1.2-2012(R2017) Table 1,
Minimum Air Gaps for Generally used Plumbing
Fixtures, page 4
This page intentionally left blank
B-1
Appendix B
ASME A112.1.2-2012(R2017) Table 1, Minimum Air Gaps for Generally used Plumbing Fixtures,13F
1 page 4
TABLE 1
Minimum Air Gaps for Generally used Plumbing Fixtures4

FIXTURES WHERE NOT AFFECTED
BY SIDEWALLS1
(inches)

WHERE AFFECTED BY
SIDEWALLS2
(inches)
Effective opening3 not
greater than ½ of an inch
in diameter
1 1
1 /2
Effective openings3 not
greater than ¾ of an inch
in diameter
1 1
/2 2
1 /4
Effective openings3 not
greater than 1 inch in
diameter
2 3
Effective openings3
greater than 1 inch in
diameter
Two times the diameter of
effective opening
Three times the diameter of
effective opening
For SI units: 1 inch = 25.4 mm
Notes:
1 Sidewalls, ribs, or similar obstructions do not affect air gaps where spaced from the inside edge of the spout opening at a distance exceeding three times the diameter of the effective opening for a single wall, or at a distance exceeding four times the effective opening for two intersecting walls. 2 Vertical walls, ribs, or similar obstructions extending from the water surface to or above the horizontal plane of the spout opening other than specified in Footnote 1 above. The effect of three or more such vertical walls or ribs has not been determined. In such cases, the air gap shall be measured from the top of the wall.
3 The effective opening shall be the minimum cross-sectional area at the seat of the control valve or the supply pipe or tubing that feeds the device or outlet.

Where two or more lines supply one outlet, the effective opening shall be the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the individual supply lines or the area of the single outlet, whichever is smaller.
4 Air gaps less than 1 inch (25.4 mm) shall be approved as a permanent part of a listed assembly that has been tested under actual backflow conditions with vacuums of 0 to 25 inches of mercury (85 kPa).
1 Reprinted from ASME A112.1.2-2012(R2017), by permission of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. All rights reserved
B-2
This page intentionally left blank
Appendix C
Backflow Prevention Assembly Diagrams
This page intentionally left blank
C-1
Appendix C
Diagram 1
Double check detector backflow prevention assembly14F
1 1 © 2023 University of Southern California. Used with permission.

C-2
Appendix C
Diagram 2
Double check detector backflow prevention assembly – type II 15F 2 2 © 2023 University of Southern California. Used with permission.

C-3
Appendix C
Diagram 3
Double check valve backflow prevention assembly16F
3 3 © 2023 University of Southern California. Used with permission C-4
Appendix C
Diagram 4
Pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly 17F 4 4 © 2023 University of Southern California. Used with permission C-5
Appendix C
Diagram 5
Reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly 18F 5 5 © 2023 University of Southern California. Used with permission C-6
Appendix C
Diagram 6
Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly 19F 6 6 © 2023 University of Southern California. Used with permission C-7
Appendix C
Diagram 7
Reduced pressure principle detector backflow prevention assembly – type II 20F 7 7 © 2023 University of Southern California. Used with permission C-8
Appendix C
Diagram 8
Spill-resistant pressure vacuum breaker backsiphonage prevention assembly 21F 8 8 © 2023 University of Southern California. Used with permission C-9
Appendix C
Swivel-Ell Design and Construction Criteria
The criteria below, in conjunction with the swivel-ell diagrams that follow (Diagrams 9a and 9b), are minimum acceptable design and construction-related requirements for utilizing a swivel-ell. For restrictions and allowances for utilizing a swivel-ell, see CCCPH section 3.2.2.

A. Prior to operation of a swivel-ell, the PWS will receive approval for the design and construction plans of that swivel-ell from the State Water Board.

B. The drinking water supply must not, under any circumstances, be directly connected to the recycled water supply, nor be designed such that the recycled water use site could be supplied concurrently by a recycled water supply and a drinking water supply.

C. The drinking water supply line and the recycled water supply line must be offset (see Diagram 9b) in a manner that ensures a tee-connection, spool, or other prefabricated mechanical appurtenance(s) could not be readily utilized in lieu of the swivel-ell connection, nor result in the recycled water use site being supplied concurrently by recycled water and drinking water.

D. The recycled water supply line used in conjunction with the swivel-ell must be the only recycled water supply to the recycled water use area.

E. The swivel-ell must be located as close as practical to the public water system service connection, with the swivel-ell connection being located as close as practical to the RP upstream of the swivel-ell.

F. The swivel-ell must:

1. be located above ground;

2. be color-coded pursuant to section 116815 of the CHSC and its implementing regulations;

3. include appropriate signage, as required by regulation and the State Water Board;

4. be provided the security necessary to prevent interconnections, vandalism, unauthorized entry, etc.; and

5. be provided with meters on both the recycled water service and drinking water service connections.

C-10
Legend for Diagram 9a and 9b (also see next page)
RP = Reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly RW = Tertiary-treated recycled water originating from wastewater treatment facility DW = Drinking water originating from a public water system W = Water (tertiary recycled water or drinking water) to use site. As pictured, configured for supplemental drinking water to the use site.

M = Meter (next page)
PE = Plain End (next page)
GRV = Groove (next page)
PWS = Public Water System (next page)
Diagram 9a: Example Swivel-Ell Pictorial (also see Plan View Schematics) Note: The RP, a required component of an acceptable swivel-ell, is not shown in the picture.

C-11
Diagram 9b: Swivel-Ell Typical Plan View Schematics
(not intended to be an exact portrayal of the pictorial) C-12
This page intentionally left blank
Appendix D
High Hazard Premises
This page intentionally left blank
D-1

APPENDIX D

HIGH HAZARD CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PREMISES
The list below identifies premises that require backflow protection provided by an air gap or a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly, unless noted otherwise. The list below is not intended to be all-inclusive. A PWS, State Water Board, or local health agency may require an AG, RP, or both to protect a PWS from other hazards not listed below and identified in premises through the hazard assessment completed in CCCPH Chapter 3, section 3.2.1. A PWS may reduce or increase the minimum protection required for a previously hazard-assessed user premise following a hazard reassessment as described in CCCPH Chapter 3, section 3.2.1.

1. Sewage handling facilities

2. Wastewater lift stations and pumping stations

3. Wastewater treatment processes, handling, or pumping equipment that is interconnected to a piping system connected to a PWS (+)

4. Petroleum processing or storage plants

5. Radioactive material storage, processing plants or nuclear reactors

6. Mortuaries

7. Cemeteries

8. Sites with an auxiliary water supply interconnected with PWS (+)

9. Sites with an auxiliary water supply not interconnected with PWS

10.Premises with more than one connection to the PWS (++++)

11.Recycled water (++)(+++)

12.Recycled water interconnected to piping system that contains water received from a PWS (+)

13.Graywater systems, as defined in California Water Code Section 14876, that are interconnected to a piping system that is connected to a PWS

14.Medical facilities

15.Kidney dialysis facilities

16.Dental office with water-connected equipment

17.Veterinarian facilities

18.Chemical plants

19.Laboratories

20.Biotech facilities

21.Electronics manufacture

22.Dry cleaner facilities

23.Industrial or commercial laundry facilities

24.Metal-plating facilities

25.Business park with a single meter serving multiple businesses

26.Marine-port facilities

27.Car wash facilities

28.Mobile home park, RV park, or campgrounds with RV hookups D-2

29.Hotels/motels

30.Gas stations

31.Fire stations

32.Solid waste disposal facilities

33.Pet groomers

34.Agricultural premises

35.Hazard assessment access denied or restricted

36.Railroad maintenance facilities

37.Incarceration facilities (e.g. prisons)

38.Temporary connections to fire hydrants for miscellaneous uses, including construction

39.Private water distribution mains

40.Drinking water storage tank overflow connected to a sump or storm drain (+)

41.Airports
(+) Premise isolated by air gap only except as allowed through CCCPH Section 3.2.2(c) (++) Dual-plumbed use areas established per CCR Title 22, Section 60313 through 60316.
(+++) Residences using recycled water for landscape irrigation as part of an approved dual plumbed use area established pursuant to CCR Title 22, sections 60313 through 60316 shall use, at a minimum, a DC. If the water supplier is also the supplier of the recycled water, then the recycled water supplier may obtain approval of the local public water supplier or the State Water Board, to utilize an alternative backflow protection plan that includes an annual inspection of both the recycled water and potable water systems and an annual cross-connection test of the recycled water and potable water systems pursuant to subsection 60316(a) in lieu of any BPA. (++++) All connections must receive at least the same level of protection excluding fire protection when connected to the PWS distribution system (e.g. if one connection requires an RP then all connections must have RPs installed).

Appendix E
General Range of Knowledge for CrossConnection Control Specialists This page intentionally left blank
E-1

APPENDIX E
General Range of Knowledge for Cross-Connection Control Specialists To effectively prevent unintended backflow into a PWS’s distribution system, it is necessary for a cross-connection control specialist to have an understanding of a range of subjects related to cross-connection control. This appendix provides a list of such subjects.

This appendix is not meant to preclude instruction of additional subjects that may be necessary or beneficial to the goal of a prospective or existing cross-connection control specialist in being proficient in protecting public health from backflow through crossconnection control measures. Emphasis on particular subjects should be in a manner that best achieves that goal.
(a) GENERAL
(1) Cross-connection control terminology.
(2) The history leading to the need for cross-connection control, including causes, impacts, including but not limited to:
(A) potable water distribution systems;
(B) examples of backflow incidents and actual or potential public health impacts; and
(C) evolution of methods of cross-connection control and backflow prevention assemblies.
(3) Hydraulics (general) – An understanding of hydraulic gradients, pressure variations, flow rates, temperature, the properties of water, backsiphonage, backpressure, and other elements necessary to understand the causes for backflow.
(4) Public outreach – How to appropriately convey the value of cross-connection control to PWS personnel and the public.
(b) LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND GUIDANCE
(1) Federal – Applicable federal laws, regulations, and guidance. (2) State – California laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the State Water Resources Control Board’s most recent edition of its Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook and other requirements related to cross-connection control.
(3) Local – An understanding of the need to ensure local requirements are considered and how best to find such requirements.

E-2
(c) HAZARD ASSESSMENTS AND METHODS TO PREVENT BACKFLOW
A comprehensive understanding of how to conduct cross-connection surveys of water systems for the purpose of identifying cross-connections, assessing hazards, and identifying the most effective and legally appropriate methods for protection from backflow. At a minimum, the following topics should be considered to achieve such an understanding:
(1) Surveys:
(A) Preparation (e.g., authority, notification, prioritizing customers/premises, coordinating with public water systems, etc.); (B) Design and as-built drawings related to water supply and crossconnection control; (C) Public water system schematics;
(D) How to identify existing and new construction, with an understanding of how construction may impact backflow protection;
(E) How to identify cross-connections (actual and potential); (F) How to identify and differentiate between high hazard and low hazard cross-connections; and
(G) Problems associated with multi-story buildings, multiple service connections at a premises, typical water-use equipment, etc., and varying types of water service, including irrigation, recycled water, gray water, fire prevention systems, and dual plumbed premises.
(2) Assessing Hazards:
(A) Identifying and differentiating between premises activities leading to high hazard cross-connections and low hazard cross-connections (for examples of high hazard activities, see Appendix D); and (B) Understanding potential public health impacts from backflow associated with the problems in section (c)(1)(G) of this appendix. (3) Assemblies and Methods for Backflow Prevention:
(A) A comprehensive understanding of approved methods for crossconnection control and preventing backflow with respect to an assessed hazard;
(B) Identifying unapproved methods for cross-connection control and preventing backflow;
(C) An understanding of components, design and operation, proper installation and location of backflow prevention assemblies, including air gaps, and backflow prevention assembly field test methods, field test results, and the assessment of air gaps; and
(D) Identifying unapproved assemblies, as well as those assemblies whose operation and/or state of repair necessitates replacement with an approved assembly.

E-3
(d) CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAMS
A comprehensive understanding of the development, elements, and administration of cross-connection control programs, including, but not limited to:
(1) An ability to assess the federal, state, and local requirements applicable to a public water system’s cross-connection control program, such that adherence to the cross-connection control program would result in compliance with the requirements;
(2) The roles, responsibilities, and authority of individuals and entities involved in the critical elements of a successful plan for cross-connection control (see CCCPH section 3.1.4); and
(3) The ability to assess the components of a public water system’s CrossConnection Control Plan (see CCCPH section 3.1.4) that best assures the prevention of undesired backflow into the public water system’s distribution system, and to communicate deficiencies to public water system personnel. (e) CROSS-CONNECTION TESTS
A comprehensive understanding of:
(1) The purpose of a cross-connection test and when a cross-connection test should be performed;
(2) The ability to develop protocols and make arrangements for cross-connection tests, and subsequently oversee and/or perform such cross-connection tests, in a manner that determines whether interconnections exist between unapproved sources and approved water supplies; and
(3) Follow-up actions and notifications if a cross-connection test indicates an interconnection.
(f) RECORDKEEPING AND INCIDENT RESPONSE
A comprehensive understanding of:
(1) The agencies and authorities to be notified in the event of a backflow incident;
(2) How to determine the cause of a backflow incident and the actions necessary to prevent similar incidents in the future;
(3) How to properly document a backflow incident, including but not limited to the information in the example backflow incident response form in Appendix F; and (4) How to properly document the elements associated with surveys and hazard assessments, including those identified in section (c) of this appendix.

E-4
This page intentionally left blank
Appendix F
Example Backflow Incident Reporting Form
This page intentionally left blank
F-1

BACKFLOW INCIDENT REPORT FORM
Water System: _______________________________________________________ Water System Number: _________________________________________________ Incident Date: ________________________________________________________ Incident Time (if known):________________________________________________ Incident Location: _____________________________________________________ How was the incident discovered?
____________________________________________________________________ Backflow Originated from:

Premise Location: ________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________________ Premise Contact Person: _______________________ Title:____________________ Phone:_______________ Email: ________________________________ Connection Type: (please check one)
Industrial Commercial Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Irrigation Recycled Water Water System Facility
Other: _______________________________________
Description and source of backflow substance (please be as descriptive as possible):
_____________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ If available, please attach an MSDS or other chemical description form Was the backflow fluid contained within the user side? YES NO Estimated Number of Affected Persons: ______________________________________ F-2
Number and description of consumer complaints received:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Did any consumers report illness? Please describe.
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ If applicable, please describe the consumer notification:
_____________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________

INVESTIGATION
Please describe the water system investigation including time frames:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ What was the area system pressure? _______________________________________ Is this within typical range: YES NO - typical pressure: _____________ Was a sample of the water contaminated by the backflow incident collected and stored before flushing? YES NO
Please describe all sampling:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ DDW recommends laboratory or field sampling for the following parameters: total coliform, E. coli, free and total chlorine residual, pH, odor, turbidity, temperature, and color. Additional sampling should be collected at the PWS and regulatory agency’s discretion.

F-3

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Please describe the corrective actions taken by the water system:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Was the chlorine residual increased after discovery of backflow incident? YES NO Date of the last cross-connection control hazard assessment of the premise with the backflow incident conducted: ______________________________________________ Did the premise have backflow prevention assemblies? YES NO Date of most recent backflow prevention assembly test(s): _______________________ When was the Division of Drinking Water or Local County Health office notified? Date: __________________Time: __________ Contact Person: __________________ Was the Division or Local County Health notified within 24 hours? YES NO Other agencies or organizations contacted?

CERTIFICATION
Name: _________________________________ Job Title: _______________________ Certification(s): _________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Please list all cross-connection control related certifications including number and expiration date
F-4
I certify that the forgoing information is true and correct to the best of my ability.

Signature: ____________________________ Date: ___________________________ Attach the following applicable documentation

1. Laboratory Test Results

2. Sketch of the cross-connection and modifications

3. MSDS or chemical information forms if chemical hazard is known

4. Applicable backflow assembly test reports including the most recent test before the incident

5. Other relevant supporting documentation
Appendix G
Related Statutes and Regulations
This page intentionally left blank
G-1
The following laws and regulations are considered related or tangential to the CCCPH, and are included in a descriptive format to provide additional, relevant background information
California Laws and Regulations
In addition to the California SDWA statutory requirements cited in CCCPH Chapter 1, section 1.3.1, California has statutes addressing certain authorities and requirements that may have influenced the CCCPH or may otherwise be of interest. ▪ Urban and community water systems must have a written policy on discontinuation of residential service for nonpayment and must not discontinue residential service for nonpayment if certain conditions are met. (CHSC sections 116900 – 116926) ▪ Senate Bill 1263 (2017) requires that before a person submits an application for a permit for a proposed new public water system, the person shall first submit a preliminary technical report which must include a cost comparison of a new public water system and consolidations with an existing system. (CHSC section 116527) ▪ Effective June 24, 2015, Senate Bill 88 (SB 88) (Statutes 2015, Chapter 27) added sections 116680-116684 to the CHSC, allowing the State Water Board to require certain water systems that consistently fail to provide safe drinking water to consolidate with, or receive an extension of service from, another public water system. The consolidation can be physical or managerial. ▪ Local health officers may maintain programs for the control of cross-connections by water users, within water users’ premises, where public exposure to backflow may occur. Such programs may include water user premises inspections, collection of fees, certification of backflow prevention assembly2F
1 (BPA) testers, and other
discretionary elements. Local health officer BPA tester certification standards must be consistent with the standards prescribed in the CCCPH. Water users are required to comply with all orders, instructions, regulations, and notices from the local health officer regarding installation, testing, and maintenance of a BPA. (CHSC sections 116800 - 116820).
▪ Pursuant to the California Building Standards Law (CHSC sections 18901 - 18949.31), the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) must administer the processes related to the adoption, approval, and publication of regulations referred to as the California Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulation). Title 24 serves as the basis for the minimum design and construction 1 California statutes use a variety of terms when referencing a ‘backflow prevention assembly’ (e.g., backflow protective device, backflow protection equipment, backflow prevention device, backflow or back siphonage protection device, backflow preventer, or backflow device). For consistency with industry terminology, ‘backflow prevention assembly’ is used in the CCCPH, unless directly quoted otherwise.

G-2
of buildings in California and includes the California Plumbing Code (Part 5 of Title 24), which contains requirements pertaining to cross-connection control and backflow prevention.
▪ A BPA intended to convey or dispense water for human consumption via drinking or cooking must meet California’s “lead free” requirements. (CHSC section 116875)
▪ Limits are established for the installation of backflow protection equipment where automatic fire sprinkler systems are utilized. (CHSC section 13114.7)23F 2 ▪ Cross-connection control must be addressed in engineering reports that are required (CCR Title 22, section 60323) for recycled water projects. (Wat. Code section 13552.8)
▪ If a public agency requires the use of recycled water for toilet and urinal flushing in a structure (except certain mental health facilities), the public health agency must prepare an engineering report that addresses cross-connection control. (Wat.

Code section 13554)
▪ Prior to indoor use of recycled water in a condominium project, the entity delivering the recycled water must submit a report, for State Water Board24F 3 approval, and
include the following related to cross-connection control (Wat. Code section 13553(d)(1)):
▫ The condominium project must be provided with a backflow prevention assembly approved by the State Water Board.
▫ The backflow prevention assembly must be inspected and tested annually by a certified tester.
▫ The condominium project must be tested by the recycled water agency or local agency at least once every four years for indications of possible crossconnections between the condominium’s potable and non-potable systems. ▪ California’s Department of Water Resources was required to convene a task force, known as the 2002 Recycled Water Task Force, to identify constraints, impediments, and opportunities for the increased use of recycled water and report 2 CHSC section 13114.7 historically provided potential limits for backflow prevention assemblies on fire sprinklers. Even though current standards differ from the language stated in CHSC section 13114.7, it is still being provided as a historical reference as there may still be installations with the now outdated limits established in section 13114.7
3 The California Department of Public Health’s authority and responsibility pertaining to this reference was transferred to the State Water Board via Senate Bill 861 (2014, Chapter 35). As such, applicable statutory mandates that may refer to “California Department of Public Health” or “Department” may be referred to as “State Water Board” in this document.

G-3
to the Legislature by July 1, 2003. The task force was also asked to advise and make recommendations concerning cross-connection control, including the applicability of visual inspections instead of pressure tests for cross-connections between potable and non-potable water systems. (Wat. Code section 13578(b)(1).

The final report25F
4 provided the following recommendations to the State Water Board – Division of Drinking Water (Division):
▫ Prepare guidance on dual plumbed regulations (22 CCR sections 60313-60316) consistent with Appendix J of plumbing code (Chapter 15 of 2019 California Plumbing Code, formerly Chapter 16A).
▫ Support thorough assessment of risk associated with cross-connections between disinfection tertiary recycled water and potable water. ▫ Ensure uniform interpretation of cross-connection control requirement of Title 22 regulations (recycled water) and Title 17 (cross-connection control regulations)
▫ Recommend stakeholders to review draft Title 17 regulations. ▪ A person engaged in the salvage, purchase, or sale of scrap metal who knowingly possesses a backflow prevention assembly (or connections to the assembly or any part of the assembly), or who failed to report the possession of such items, which was previously owned by a utility or public agency, is guilty of a crime. (Pen. Code section 496e)
▪ Junk dealers or recyclers who possess a backflow prevention assembly (or connections to that assembly or any part of the assembly) without a written certification from the agency or utility owning or previously owning the assembly will be liable to the agency or utility for the wrongful possession. (Civ. Code section 3336.5 and, similarly, Bus. & Prof. Code section 21609.1) Please note that a number of the codes, regulations, and statutes cited above are implemented under the authority of regulatory entities other than the State Water Board and would therefore be beyond the scope of this CCCPH. The intent of providing such citations is to increase general awareness with respect to other potential statutory requirements associated with cross-connection control. The list is not exhaustive and does not include other requirements that may exist, including those via regulations that may have been adopted by an appropriate regulatory entity.

Federal Laws and Regulations
4 California Department of Water Resources. (2003). Water Recycling 2030: Recommendations of California’s Recycled Water Task Force
G-4
All suppliers of domestic water to the public are subject to regulations adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. section 300f et seq.), as well as by the State Board under the California SDWA (Health & Saf. Code, div. 104, pt. 12, ch. 4, section 116270 et seq.). Additionally, the State Water Board has been delegated primacy - the responsibility and authority to administer U.S. EPA's drinking water regulations within California – on the condition that California adopt enforceable requirements no less stringent than U.S. EPA's.

The U.S. EPA currently has no distinct cross-connection control requirements that apply broadly to public water systems (PWS); however, the importance of cross-connection control is evident by the issue papers and guidance documents developed by U.S. EPA and their recognition that cross-connections and backflow represent a significant public health risk (see discussion in Chapter 2). Although U.S. EPA currently has no distinct cross-connection control requirements, the subject of cross-connection or backflow prevention assemblies is included in the U.S. SDWA and the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) in relation to PWS, including the following:26F 5 ▪ If used exclusively for non-potable services, a backflow prevention assembly (BPA) is exempt from the federal lead prohibitions. (42, U.S.C. section 300g) ▪ Allows increasing disinfectant concentrations in a PWS distribution system in the event of a cross-connection (backflow) event. (40 C.F.R. section 141.130(d)) ▪ Proper maintenance of the distribution system, including cross-connection control, is identified as a best available technology (BAT) for microbial contaminant control. (40 C.F.R. section 141.63(e))
▪ Under the federal Revised Total Coliform Rule, a PWS having a cross-connection control program is one of the enhancements necessary to reduce monitoring for a PWS that had been under an increased monitoring frequency. (40 C.F.R. section 141.854(h)(2))
▪ Under the federal Revised Total Coliform Rule, a PWS having a cross-connection control program is a criterion for a state to allow a reduced monitoring frequency (40 C.F.R. section 141.855(d)(1))
▪ If a state allows the monitoring frequency reductions previously mentioned under the federal Revised Total Coliform Rule, a state is required to include in its primacy package to U.S. EPA how a PWS will be required to demonstrate cross-connection control. (40 C.F.R. section 142.16(q))
5 For requirements unrelated to cross-connection control, please consult California’s laws and regulations specific to the topic of interest. California may have more stringent requirements (e.g., reduced monitoring allowed via federal regulations may be prohibited in California).

Item No. 1.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorization to Sell Retired Police Service Dog and Purchase Replacement Police Service Dog and Training
SOURCE: Police
COMMENT: In August 2020, the City of Porterville purchased K9 "Neith," a Belgian Malinois, for use as a police service dog and explosive detection. K9 "Neith" is now 7 years old and has been in service for over five years. K9 "Neith" has reached an age, coupled with some recent health concerns, wherein service as a police service dog is not in the best interest of either the department or the dog. These factors increase his chances of being injured while on duty as well as his chances of being physically impacted due to our stringent training program. Also, there is an increasing potential that "Neith" might not be able to perform at a peak level when needed, which could jeopardize the safety of the handler and other police officers. Because "Neith" is no longer able to perform at a high level as a police service dog, the fair market value of "Neith” is $1.00.

When a police service dog retires, the two options available are to either euthanize the animal or enter into a contract to sell it to a person who has advanced training and experience in handling police service dogs and who is willing to assume all liability for the animal. Officer Jasmine McAlister is "Neith’s” handler and has a vast amount of experience handling police service dogs and is willing to assume all liability for the animal. As such, she has requested to purchase "Neith." In addition, the Department would also like to include the 10' x 10' security kennel which houses "Neith". The kennel is familiar to the K9 and would be used to secure "Neith" when the handler is away.

In addition, in July of this year, one of the Department's K9 handlers was reassigned to the Patrol Division. This left another vacancy within the Department K9 Unit. This K9, "Duke," has been kenneled at Top Dog Training Center to await the selection of his new handler.

Top Dog Training Center is the Department's current police service dog vendor and trainer, and the only police service dog kennel in Tulare County that provides a selection of police service dogs and associated training for the Item No. 1.
needs of the Department. Top Dog Training Center supplies police service dogs to agencies throughout the State of California including the Tulare County Sheriff’s Department, Kings County Sheriff’s Department, Woodlake Police Department, Farmersville Police Department, Shafter Police Department, and Dinuba Police Department.

The Department's police service dog specialists recently visited the vendor to evaluate police service dogs and obtain pricing for one new police service dog and associated training for two new handlers. The Department would like to enter into an agreement with Top Dog Training Center to acquire one police service dog and necessary training for two dog handlers. With the addition of the new police service dog, and with the additional training for "Duke’s" new handler, the Department will have all four police service dogs providing 24- hours/7-day-a-week coverage on patrol with these valuable tools. The training also includes specialty training such as detection of illegal firearms, explosives, and illegal narcotics such as fentanyl.

This vendor provides a full guarantee against any congenital health defects for two years after the date of purchase and additionally guarantees the dog for non-health service-related problems for one year.

The total cost for one police service dog and the related training for two handlers is $31,754.38. Funds for this purchase are available in the Police Department's Drug Asset Forfeiture account and training account.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Approve the sale of K9 "Neith" and the security kennel to Officer Jasmine McAlister for the amount of $1.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement for said sale; and

2. Approve the purchase of one new police service dog and related training for two new canine handlers from Top Dog Training Center for the amount of $31,754.38, and authorize the Chief of Police to enter into an agreement with Top Dog Training Center to acquire said service dogs and training.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. K9 Purchase Agreement - Neith

2. PPD Quote Patrol Service Dog

3. PPD Quote Training Courses
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Item No. 1.

Department Director:

Jake Castellow, Chief of Police
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
1 CITY OF PORTERVILLE
CANINE (K-9) PURCHASE AGREEMENT
This Agreement between the City of Porterville (“City”) and Officer Jasmine McAlister (“Officer”) is made with reference to the following findings:

A. Officer is assigned to the Patrol Division which includes being a K-9 Handler.

B. Officer was, in conjunction with his assignment as a K-9 Handler, given the care, custody and control of a police dog named “Neith”. Because of the extraordinary amount of time a handler spends with his canine partner, a strong mutual bond is developed between the handler and his canine.

Furthermore, the Dog has been specially trained to assist officers in law enforcement tasks, and to respond to commands issued specifically by the Officer.

C. The average working life expectancy for a police service dog is five to eight years. Neith was purchased and has been in either training or working for the department five years, but is approximately seven years old. Also coupled with some recent health concerns, wherein service as a police service dog is not in the best interest of either the department or the dog. These factors increase his chances of being injured while on duty as well as his chances of being physically impacted due to our stringent training program. Given the above factors, further service of the Dog to the City is of minimal monetary value.

D. Due to the findings in Sections A through C, the City desires to sell the Dog to the Officer, pursuant to the terms set forth herein.

NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. City hereby sells the Dog to the Officer for the sum of one dollar ($1.00). The city is also providing the Officer with the Dog’s kennel and carrier at no additional cost to Officer.

2. Officer agrees and hereby assumes ownership and full responsibility for the care, maintenance, securing, food, housing, medical needs and expenses, and any and all other expenses that result from or arise out of Officer’s ownership of the Dog. City shall have no further responsibility or liability for the Dog or Dog’s care. Officer understands that City has made no representations concerning the health or condition of the Dog and accepts the Dog “as is.” Officer acknowledges that any dog’s behavior is subject to change, including but limited to a change in personality, health, or character, and also including aggression, and therefore Officer hereby assumes all risk of any kind related to the actions or behavior of said Dog, including but not limited to acts of aggression. In acknowledgment of this, Officer hereby releases City from any liability for behavioral actions of the Dog or the direct or indirect consequences thereof.

3. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Officer agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend the City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers, from and against any and all causes of action, claims, liabilities, obligations, judgments, or damages, including reasonable legal counsels’ fees 2 and costs of litigation, arising out of Officer’s ownership or control of the Dog, or Dog or Officer’s actions with Dog outside the course and scope of employment, and including the City’s active or passive negligence, except for such loss or damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

4. Officer gives up and waives any right he may have on behalf of himself and his heirs, assigns, and successors for any loss, injury, damage, claim, or liability arising out of or in any way related to Officer’s ownership and possession of the Dog.

5. This agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties and may only be amended by mutual written agreement executed by the parties.

Date: ___________________
OFFICER:
________________________
Jasmine McAlister
CITY OF PORTERVILLE:
________________________
Greg Meister, Mayor

QUOTATION
Date: July 24, 2025
City of Porterville
Police Department
350 N. D Street
Porterville, CA 93257
To:

Qty Description Unit Price Line Total
1 Dual Purpose Dog (Patrol and Detection) $9,750.00 $9,750.00 Subtotal $9,750.00
Sales Tax $804.38
Less Deposit
Total $10,554.38
Top Dog Training Center, 3528 Dorset Court, Tulare, Ca 93274 Phone 559-740-2146

QUOTATION
Date: July 24, 2025
City of Porterville
Police Department
350 N. D Street
Porterville, CA 93257
To:

Qty Description Unit Price Line Total
1 Patrol Dog Course (New Handler with “Duke”) $5,200.00 $5,200.00 1 Narcotic Detection Course - Duke (Meth, Heroin, Cocaine, Fentanyl) $4,800.00 $4,800.00 1 Patrol Dog Course (New Hander with New Dog) $5,200.00 $5,200.00 1 Explosive Detection Course (New Handler with New Dog) $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Subtotal $21,200.00
Sales Tax N/A
Less Deposit
Total $21,200.00
Top Dog Training Center, 3528 Dorset Court, Tulare, Ca 93274 Phone 559-740-2146
Item No. 2.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorization to Purchase and Upfit a Replacement Vehicle for the Fire Department
SOURCE: Fire
COMMENT: The Fire Department has evaluated its fleet and identified the need to replace Vehicle 2129, a 2009 Ford Expedition, due to age, mileage, and maintenance costs. Ongoing supply chain challenges and limited vendor availability have contributed to delays in acquiring and upfitting emergency vehicles. To improve deployment timelines, staff recommends using approved vendors for both the vehicle purchase and equipment upfitting.

The replacement vehicle will be a full-size, four-wheel-drive SUV equipped with emergency lighting, communication systems, and gear storage to support emergency response, administrative functions, and mobile command operations. The vehicle will be assigned to command staff but may be reassigned as operational needs evolve. Salvageable equipment from the outgoing vehicle will be reused when feasible to reduce costs.

The estimated vehicle purchase cost is $85,000, and upfitting is estimated at $30,000. Staff requests a 10% contingency to address potential cost variances.

Funding is available in the Fire Department’s Equipment Replacement/Depreciation Fund.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Authorize the purchase of one replacement vehicle from an approved vendor for an amount not to exceed $85,000, including tax, license, and applicable fees;

2. Authorize the upfitting of the vehicle with necessary emergency equipment and tools from an approved vendor for an amount not to exceed $30,000, including tax and fees; and

3. Approve a 10% contingency for the total purchase and upfitting, for a total amount not to exceed $126,500.

Item No. 2.

ATTACHMENTS:

Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Bryan Cogburn, Fire Chief
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Item No. 3.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorization to Purchase Master Meter 4G Radio Read Parts and Meters SOURCE: Public Works
COMMENT: Water meters are essential for measuring consumption and generating revenue for the City’s water utility. The City maintains approximately 17,000 meters and is currently converting all direct-read meters to a fixed 4G radio read network.

Delays of up to ten weeks in receiving meter orders have made it difficult to maintain adequate inventory levels.

Master Meter Inc. products make up about 30% of the active meters in the City’s system and have been used for over ten years. Hydro Pro Solutions is the sole distributor of Master Meter equipment in California. To maintain service reliability and meet current and future development needs, staff is requesting authorization to purchase new and replacement 4G radio read meters and registers from Hydro Pro Solutions.

This authorization will also provide flexibility to address any meter inventory needs that may have been missed during the original assessment for the fixed network conversion. Funding is available in the Water Operating Fund for Fiscal Year 2025–2026.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Water Utility Superintendent to purchase miscellaneous new and replacement Master Meter radio-read water meters and meter registers from Hydro Pro Solutions during the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year at a not-to-exceed amount of $100,000.

ATTACHMENTS:

Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Item No. 3.

Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Item No. 4.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorization to Purchase Water Shares or Surface Water for Groundwater Recharge
SOURCE: Public Works
COMMENT: Each year, staff seeks City Council authorization to acquire water shares or surface water from surrounding entities to support the City’s groundwater recharge efforts.

The City currently owns 505 shares of Pioneer Water Company (PWC), and it has been the Council’s direction to increase the City’s holdings and water rights when opportunities arise. If approved, the City Manager, or designee, will be authorized to submit bids on available water shares, negotiate purchases from local irrigation districts, and acquire surface water offered for sale. Funds for these purchases have been allocated in the Water Operating Fund budget for the 2025–2026 Fiscal Year.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the City Manager, or designee, to purchase water shares or surface water during the 2025–2026 Fiscal Year up to $1,500,000.

ATTACHMENTS:

Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Michael Knight, Assistant City Manager
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Item No. 5.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorization to Purchase Sewer Lift Station Replacement Pump Motors SOURCE: Public Works
COMMENT: The City of Porterville Sewer Division is responsible for the operation and maintenance of twenty-four (24) lift stations throughout the City. These lift stations are critical to the functionality of the City’s sewer system, particularly in areas where wastewater cannot flow by gravity. They help prevent sewer backups and overflows and play a vital role in protecting public health by ensuring the proper conveyance of wastewater to the City’s treatment facility.

Each lift station operates using two submersible pumps, where the electric motor and pump are combined into a single unit designed to operate entirely submerged. While submersible pumps are known for their efficiency and quiet operation, the nature of their environment exposes the motors to potential failure due to water intrusion, overheating, and debris-related wear.

Due to the high cost and extended lead time for procuring replacement submersible pump motors, it is essential to maintain a backup inventory. This ensures system redundancy and minimizes downtime during unexpected failures.

To support this need, staff solicited quotes from three local vendors for replacement pump motors. The quotes received are as follows:

Company Total
Flo-Line Technology, Inc. $70,468
Industrial Electric Company $86,095
Turnupseed Electric Service, Inc. $86,599
Flo-Line Technology, Inc. submitted the lowest quote at $70,468. Upon delivery, the motors will be used to complete necessary repairs throughout the 2025–2026 Fiscal Year. Funding for this purchase is available in the Sewer Revolving Fund.

Item No. 5.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Direct the Finance Director to initiate a Purchase Order to FloLine Technology, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $77,515, which includes parts, taxes, shipping, and a 10% contingency; and

2. Direct the Finance Director to make payment to Flo-Line Technology, Inc. upon receipt of the invoice approved by the City Manager, or designee.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Flo-Line Technology, Inc

2. Industrial Electric

3. Turnupseed Eletric Service, Inc
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager

Item No. 6.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorization to Repair Transit Bus Transmission SOURCE: Public Works
COMMENT: Vehicle #8191, an active transit bus, has experienced wear-related damage to its automatic transmission and requires a full overhaul. The bus is equipped with an Allison automatic transmission, which must be serviced by an authorized Allison Transmission repair facility to maintain warranty and performance standards.

Staff recommends utilizing Saunders Automatic Service Inc. in Fresno, the nearest authorized Allison service provider, to perform the necessary overhaul. The estimated cost is $12,965, which includes all parts, labor, applicable taxes, and a 10% contingency. Funding is available in the Transit Operating Budget.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Authorize the transit bus repair by Saunders Automatic Service Inc. at a cost not to exceed $12,965 (inclusive of all parts, taxes, labor, and a 10% contingency); and

2. Authorize payment of said repair upon satisfactory
completion.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Estimate #8191 Transmission
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager

Item No. 7.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorization to Enter into Software License Agreement with EKOS Software SOURCE: Public Works
COMMENT: On November 19, 2024, the City awarded a contract to Western Pump for the replacement of fuel pumps and the associated fuel management system. As part of this project, a software license agreement and cellular data communications is required to support the operation of the new fuel management system once it is installed and placed into service.

The software provider, EKOS Software, is proprietary to the components included in the awarded project and is therefore a sole-source vendor for this system. The license agreement is structured as a five-year term, with annual renewals at a cost of $8,784 per year, for a total expenditure of $43,920 over the five-year period.

Funding is available in the Shop Operating Budget. Staff is requesting authorization to execute the annual license agreement with EKOS Software for a five-year period.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City council:

1. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute an annual software license agreement with EKOS Software for a five-year term, for an amount not to exceed $43,920; and

2. Authorize payment for this service from the Shop operating budget.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. EKOS License Agreement - City of Porterville, CA (1) Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Item No. 7.

Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager

EKOS - SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
Please select your EKOS Products and Services
EKOS SOFTWARE MENU Quantity Per Month Prices Setup Fees (One-time) SECTION A: FUEL & SITE SOFTWARE
Fuel Site Module
Fuel Site Module
 Includes Help Desk Support.
 Includes EKOS Service & Repair Support.
 Includes ATG Compliance & Site Compliance.
$179 per site/controller $3,000 1 – 10 = $3,000)
(11+ = $300 / site)
Inventory Mngt. Only w/ Compliance
 Includes Fuel Site Module limited to Inventory.
 Includes ATG Compliance & Site Compliance.
$25 per ATG $100 per site
Concierge - Service & Repair Management $125 per site
REV (Mobile App)
 Includes fuel site module limited to REV. $50 per device Fuel Card Module
Fuel Card Module – EKOS/Gasboy Cards
 Customer will pay pump prices at retail gas stations.  Truck stop fees may apply.

FREE
Fuel Card Module - Non EKOS/Gasboy Cards
 EKOS can pull in WEX Direct cards, Voyager cards, and Comdata cards.
$100 per platform per month $3,000 per integration
Bulk Fuel Module
Bulk Fuel Module $50 per site
Bulk Invoice Audit Feature
 Includes Bulk Fuel Module.
 Additional setup fees may be quoted based on scope
of work.
$150 per site $25,000
Concierge - Bulk Fuel Management $.02 per gallon
EV Fuel Module
EKOS - EV Module $20 per connector $3,000 EKOS - EV Payment Processing 6% fee per transaction

CUSTOMER INTAKE INFORMATION
Customer Name (full legal name)
Customer DBA
Address
City / State / Zip

AUTHORIZED OFFICER
Full Name / Title
Email Address
Phone number
Sales Tax Exempt Status Please indicate if you are exempt from sales tax. (Yes/No) Accounts Payable Contact and Phone
Accounts Payable Email Address *receives EKOS invoices

EKOS - SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
EKOS SOFTWARE MENU Quantity Per Month Prices Setup Fees (One-time) SECTION B: FLEET SOFTWARE
Fleet Module
EKOS - Fleet Module – Level 1
 Tracking of Assets including purchase & life cycle
details, odometer entry, VIN decoding, Asset
Statuses, Vehicle Classes, and Asset Types.
 If customer has GPS (or OEM integrations) then this
level is included in the GPS or OEM pricing.
$3 per vehicle
EKOS - Fleet Module – Level 2
 Includes all features of Level 1 plus:
 Inspections, Work Orders, Preventative Maintenance
(PMs), Total Cost of Ownership, Driver Complaints,
Purchase Orders, Parts Management, Motor Pool,
Vendor Management and GPS odometer match.
$5 per vehicle
$15,000
EKOS - Fleet Module – Level 3
 Includes all features of Levels 1, and 2 plus:

Technicians Management, Warehouse Management,
Physical Inventory Count Tool, Garage Manager,
Technician Mobile Feature, and Time Clock.
$7 per vehicle
Fleet Module – Other Assets
 Includes tools, attachments, generators, trailers,
mowers, and other assets that are not vehicles or
equipment.
$1 per unit
SECTION C: GPS & TELEMATICS
All GPS and OEM selections will include Fleet Module Level 1 with GPS and OEM Pricing.

EKOS - GPS (Active Tracking)
 Includes active real-time tracking and full suite of
advanced features.
$13 per vehicle
$3,000 not applicable if a
Fleet Module Setup Fee has
been charged in year 1

EKOS - GPS (OBD)
 Includes daily odometer updates integrated in fleet
module. No fueling is necessary to get the odometer.
 Includes ping for current location, fault codes, check engine lights, and location history when pinged.
$10 per vehicle
EKOS - GPS (Asset Tracking)
 Includes daily location, alerts & ping to locate. $9 per asset EKOS - OEM & Integrations
*Fees charged by the OEM will be paid by customer. $5 per asset $5,000 not applicable if a
Fleet Module Setup Fee has
been charged in year 1
SECTION D: COMMUNICATIONS
Cellular Communications Fees $65 per controller (includes ATG) $20 per ATG or L2 EV Charger
ET (Edge Device) All charges included with device
Wireless Inventory Monitoring Fee
 Includes Fuel Site module limited to Inventory. $20 per device SECTION E: OTHER SERVICES
Custom Development Requests Quote based on scope of work Single Sign On (SSO) Integration $1,000
Total One-Time Setup Fees $
Total Monthly Amount $
Total Contract Amount (Minimum Amount Billed Over Term) 5 years $ Customer Acknowledgement ____________________

EKOS - SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
3 | Page EKOS License Agreement Version 1.1.0524

1. Software License Agreement

1.1. This Software License Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into by and between EKOS, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, and having its principal office and place of business at 1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 205, Wilmington, NC 28403 (“EKOS”) and Customer listed on Page 1 and 2 of the Agreement. EKOS and Customer are referred to herein individually as “Party” or collectively as the “Parties”.

2. Software License

2.1. EKOS hereby grants to Customer a nonexclusive, nontransferable license to use the EKOS Platform (the “Software License” or “Software Products”) for the selected products and services on Page 1 and 2 of this agreement. Should customer elect to “upgrade” or add additional software features during the term of the contract, this license will automatically extend to those additional products and services.

2.1.1.1. Customer agrees that should it elect to use fuel cards, it shall: (a) exclusively use a EKOS approved or qualified universal fuel card program; (b) provide a list of authorized card holders (“Authorized Card Holders”) to EKOS; (c) be solely responsible for determining whether a card holder is an Authorized Card Holder and is tax exempt for billing purposes; and (d) be solely responsible for controlling the use of the Fuel Cards. In exchange, EKOS shall issue Fuel Cards to the Authorized Card Holders designated by Customer, to facilitate fueling at Customer’s Private Sites.

2.1.2. “Inventory Monitoring” – this includes online presentment of inventory values as well as historical archiving and other related features.

3. Fees, Charges

3.1. Setup and One Time Fees. Customer shall pay any “One-Time” and “Setup” fees at time of contract execution. This includes but is not limited to any setup fees listed on Page 1 and 2 of the Agreement, development and integration work (including SSO), and equipment charges purchased directly through EKOS. EKOS reserves the right to withhold access to the software system until all one-time and setup fees are paid in full by the Customer.

3.2. Software Fee. Customer shall pay EKOS based on the Products and Services selected on page 1 and 2 of the Agreement, at the listed price per month. Should Customer elect to access new Software Products developed by EKOS, Parties will agree on amended pricing.

3.2.1.1. Company will invoice Customer Annually beginning at time of contract execution. On the first invoice, a count of active products and services will betaken and willserve as the basis for the initial annual invoice. All One-Time Fees will be billed separately at the time of contract execution unless otherwise specified as part of this agreement. If Customer is purchasing new equipment that is required to utilize the functionality of a specific product or service listed on Page 1 and 2 of this agreement, then Company will invoice Customer for the applicable product or service on the day the equipment ships from the manufacturer. It is the customer’s responsibility to provide the required data and schedule installation to utilize the software.

3.2.1.2. Any time the Customer adds a billable product or service, a new prorated invoice will be sent to Customer for the new site and any applicable optional services and will be for the remainder of the current contractual year. If a site is installed any time during a month, then Customer will pay for the month.

3.2.2. A “Private Site” shall mean any fueling location owned and/or operated by Customer and for which fuel transactions are processed through the Software Products. The number of Private Sites shown on page 1 of the Agreement may change over time, and any modification of the number or location of Private Sites shall be made by Customer using the form attached as Exhibit A.

3.2.3. Software Fees are fixed for the initial term of this agreement. EKOS reserves the right to adjust fees if prices have changed during the current term for any products and services listed in this agreement for any additional renewal terms.

3.3. Inventory Monitoring Fees (Optional). Customer shall pay to EKOS an inventory monitoring fee of Twenty Dollars ($20.00) per inventory monitoring device per month for cellular based connections, and Twenty Dollars ($20.00) per device per month for wireless tank level gauges.

3.4. Communication Fees (Optional). Customer shall pay to EKOS a communication fee of Sixty-Five Dollars ($65.00) per unit per month, provided, however that Customer shall not exceed a monthly data usage of 150 megabytes per device. Customer shall be liable on a per device basis for all data charges incurred for exceeding the allotted 150 megabytes per device limit, at a billable rate of $.99 per megabyte. Customer shall also purchase the equipment necessary to provide the EKOS Brain Digital Communication Link at a price to be quoted by EKOS at the time Customer makes an election under thissubsection.

3.5. Guest Management (Optional). Customer shall pay EKOS Three Cents ($0.03) per gallon, per month for all transactions by entities other than Customer that occur at a Private Site.

3.6. Fuel Site Module One-Time Fees. Unless otherwise agreed upon in writing, a one-time setup fee will be charged for sites enrolled into the EKOS Fuel Site Module in the amount of $3,000 for sites/controllers 1 - 10 and an additional $300 per site/controller for site number 11 and higher. This one-time fee will apply at initial start-up or later in the contract period if a new site/controller is added (exceeding 10 sites). The amount of the initial fee due at contract signing will be listed on Page 1 of this agreement.

3.7. GPS (Optional). If Customer elects to use the EKOS GPS from Teletrac Navman, customer shall pay an annual fee based on the number of assets to be tracked and devices deployed at the start of each fiscal year. Customer can elect to purchase additional GPS devices at any time during the life of this contract, and fees will be prorated based on date of purchase. GPS devices will be provided as part of the monthly fee for the service as listed on page 2 of this agreement.

Installation of the GPS device is the responsibility of the customer. If requested EKOS will facilitate the device installation for an additional one-time fee of $199 per device. The terms and conditions for the use of the GPS device can be found at https://www.teletracnavman.com/media/23781/terms-and-conditionsteletrac-navman-usa-may-2023.pdf.

3.8. Fleet Maintenance Module (Optional). If Customer elects to use the EKOS Fleet Maintenance Module, customer shall pay an annual fee based on the Fleet Package Level chosen on Page 2 and the number of assets to be managed in the Fleet Module at the start of each fiscal year. Customer can elect to purchase the Fleet Maintenance Module at any time during the life of this contract, and fees will be prorated based on date of purchase.

Enrolled vehicles and total price per month for the fleet module will be listed on page 2 of this agreement.

EKOS - SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
4 | Page EKOS License Agreement Version 1.1.0524

4. Term and Termination

4.1 Term. This License Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date of this agreement (as defined herein), however, the term of this agreement will begin from the later of the Effective Date of this agreement; or the first invoice date in which all modules and services selected on Page 1 and 2 of this agreement are live and billable (Total Monthly Amount on Page 2) and shall continue in effect for Five (5) years thereafter. The Agreement shall be automatically renewed for additional terms of three (3) years each, unless either party gives written notice of termination to the other party as provided for herein (the “Renewal Term”).

4.2 Termination. This Agreement and the license granted hereby may be terminated by either party for any reason or no reason upon one-hundred twenty (120) days written notice to the other party (“Termination for Convenience”), an early termination fee will apply if GPS units have been provided as part of this agreement or, to the extent provided below, this Agreement shall terminate automatically without notice, in the event that either Party:
a. fails to comply with the terms of this Agreement and such failure is not remedied within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice from the other party;
b. becomes insolvent;
c. initiates any proceedings under bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or receivership law, or proceedings forliquidation; d. is made a defendant in any such bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, liquidation or receivership proceedings or is placed in liquidation or receivership and such liquidation, proceedings or receivership is continued for sixty (60) days; e. has any lien, petition or execution levied against the property and assets of that Party and such lien, petition or execution is not discharged within thirty (30) days;
f. makes a general assignment of its assets for the benefit of creditors or is unable to meet its debts in the ordinary course of business; Upon the occurrence of any event specified in subsections (a) through (f) of this Section, the first Party to have notice of the occurrence shall immediately, in writing, notify the other Party and shall identify both the type of occurrence and the date of occurrence.

5. Equipment, Service and Warranty

5.1 EKOS shall not be responsible for any replacement parts, fueling equipment or software products that are damaged due to Acts of God, Customer negligence or repairs and/or service provided by non-certified technicians.

5.2 EKOS Service & Repair Support. EKOS Service & Repair Support shall be effective as of the Effective Date as noted in the signature block below and shall continue for a period of this agreement as listed in section 4.1 of this agreement, including any automatic renewal terms as allowed in section 4.1 of this agreement, unless earlier terminated as provided in this Agreement. Termination may result from the failure of the Customer to comply with any of the conditions of this Agreement, or by mutual agreement of both parties.

During the Term of the Agreement, EKOS will provide the following services (the “Services”) to Customer for EKOS Software and Gasboy-branded products (“Products”) that Customer owns or has license to:

Telephone Support for Product and Services - will be provided Monday through Friday 8AM to 8PM ET. All other times not stated are considered emergency after hours support only including but not limited to weekends and holidays. EKOS Helpdesk toll-free service number is (currently 800-444-5529). This toll-free number can be changed at EKOS’s discretion.

Product Support – Issues not resolved by general help desk support will be escalated to Product Support specialists.

Software Corrections and Upgrades to the Products that Customer requires on an "as needed" basis.

Remote Diagnostics – EKOS Helpdesk can diagnose and resolve issues remotely in some cases.

EKOS Service & Repair Support – If a site visit is required, EKOS Service & Repair Support will provide ASC Contact Information at the Customer’s request at no charge.

Upon Customer’s request, Dispatch services will be available on a time and material basis for each service call. Invoicing for Site repairs will be issued by EKOS to the customer at the time that the site dispatch related services are billed by the ASC to EKOS. Billings for Site repairs will include a mark-up added to the time and material invoice that is billed by the ASC to EKOS.

The Services do not include:

On-site support.

Any hardware, even if a software correction, software upgrade, or other enhancements or modifications require a hardware update.

Support for questions not relating specifically to the Products, such as, but not limited to, non-Gasboy hardware, and PC operating systems.

Software upgrade installation costs.

6. Nonassignable and Nontransferable

6.1 The license granted herein shall not be assignable or transferrable in any manner whatsoever nor shall Customer have the right to grant any sublicenses, except by written consent of EKOS. Any permitted assignment or other transfer of this Agreement shall bind the assignee, subcontractor or transferee and shall not relieve Customer from its obligations under this Agreement.

7. Entire Agreement; Modification

7.1. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement and understanding between the parties as to the matters contained herein, and merges and supersedes all prior discussions, agreements and understandings of every kind between them as to the matters contained herein. No provision of this Agreement may be modified or amended unless such modification or amendment is agreed to in a writing signed by both of the parties hereto. Customer shall not assign its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of EKOS.

8. Notices

8.1. Any notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed sufficiently given if hand delivered or mailed by registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the party to be notified at its address shown at the beginning of this Agreement, or at such other address as may be furnished in writing to the notifying party.

EKOS - SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
5 | Page EKOS License Agreement Version 1.1.0524

9. Governing Law

9.1. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of North Carolina. For purposes of this Agreement, each party submits to the jurisdiction of the courts, both federal and state, in New Hanover County, North Carolina, and each party hereby agrees that all suits, actions and proceedings brought by any party hereunder may be brought in either federal or state court located in New Hanover County, North Carolina. Each party irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any objection which it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the venue of any such suit, action or proceeding brought in any such court, any claim that any such suit, action or proceeding brought in such a court has been brought in an inconvenient forum and the right to object, with respect to any such suit, action, or proceeding brought in any such court, that such court does not have jurisdiction over such party or the other party.

10. Intellectual Property

10.1. Customer acknowledges and agrees that: (i) it has no right, title or interest, proprietary or otherwise, in or to the Software Products or any other EKOS Intellectual Property (defined below); (ii) the EKOS Intellectual Property is owned solely by, and is proprietary to, EKOS and embodies valuable trade secrets of EKOS; and (iii) this Agreement does not give, and shall not be construed to give, Customer any vested right, title or interest in or with respect to the EKOS Intellectual Property, except for a non-exclusive, limited and terminable right of access to the Software Products for the purposes of this Agreement. EKOS owns and will continue to own, without limitation, all EKOS Intellectual Property and all rights, title and interest in and to all ideas, works, custom reports, products, programs, procedures, plans, formats and otherintellectual property of any kind created, prepared, developed or worked on by EKOS for Customer under this Agreement. As used herein, “EKOS Intellectual Property” means any copyrights, patent rights, trademarks, trade names, trade secrets, service marks, know-how (including, without limitation, all ideas, inventions, products, programs, software, procedures, customer lists, works, formats and other intellectual property) and any other similar rights or intangible assets recognized under any laws or conventions in any country or jurisdiction in the world as intellectual creations to which rights of ownership accrue, and all registrations, applications, extensions or reissues of the foregoing now or hereafter in force.

11. Confidentiality

11.1. Customer acknowledges that it may become aware of or familiar with Confidential Information of EKOS. “Confidential Information” shall mean any information relating to the business or affairs of EKOS including, but not limited to, information relating to the Software Products, other EKOS Intellectual Property, customer and Customer lists, pricing lists and methods, products, software, inventions, processes, procedures, techniques, formulae, design or other technical data, trade secrets, sources of products or materials, financial statements, equipment, programs, strategies and information, analyses, profit margins, or other proprietary information used by EKOS in connection with its business. During the term of this Agreement and for so long thereafter as the Confidential Information remains proprietary to EKOS, Customer, for itself and its administrators, employees and agents, shall (a) keep the confidential Information secret and retain it in strictest confidence, and (b) not, without the prior written consent of EKOS, furnish, make available or disclose to any third party, or use for the benefit of Customer or any third party, any Confidential Information. Customer acknowledges that the Confidential Information is vital, sensitive, confidential and proprietary to EKOS and that this covenant is reasonable and necessary for the protection of EKOS’ business interests. Customer acknowledges that the violation of any of the provisions of this Agreement will cause irreparable loss and harm to EKOS which cannot be reasonably or adequately compensated by damages in an action at law, and, accordingly, that EKOS will be entitled, without posting bond or other security, to injunctive and other equitable relief to enforce the provisions of this Agreement and to prevent or cure any breach or threatened breach thereof; but no action for any such relief shall be deemed to waive the right of EKOS to an action for damages. The rights and remedies of EKOS are cumulative and the exercise or enforcement of any one or more of them will not preclude EKOS from exercising or enforcing any other right or remedy. The obligations of the Customer and the rights of EKOS under this Agreement shall survive the termination of this Agreement regardless of the reason for or cause of the termination.

12. Binding Effect; Authorized Signatory

12.1. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and permitted assigns. The individual executing this Agreement on behalf of Customer is a duly authorized representative of Customer with full power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of Customer and to bind Customer to its obligations hereunder.

13. Amendment

13.1. A modification, amendment or waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective only if made in writing and executed by the parties to this Agreement.

14. Waiver

14.1. A modification, amendment or waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective only if made in writing and executed by the parties to this Agreement.

15. Severability

15.1. If, in the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, said provision shall be considered void to the extent of such invalidity only, without invalidating any of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

16. Counterparts

16.1. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, and all of which together constitute one and the same instrument. Any facsimile or emailed signature attached hereto will be deemed to be an original and will have the same force and effect as an original signature.

17. Disclaimer

17.1. Except for any warranty otherwise expressly provided for herein, EKOS provides their services, software, equipment and systems on an “AS IS” BASIS, WITHOUT

ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, WHETHER ORAL OR WRITTEN OR EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ALL OF WHICH ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED BY EKOS AND EKOS. IN NO EVENT SHALL EKOS HAVE ANY

LIABILITY TO CUSTOMER OR ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF DATA, LOSS OF USE, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, OR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES HOWEVER CAUSED AND WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR UNDER ANY OTHER THEORY OF LIABILITY. In addition, EKOS shall not be liable or held responsible for any delay or failure to perform or deliver all or any part of the services or products required to be performed or delivered hereunder as a direct or indirect result of any causes, contingencies or circumstances beyond EKOS’s control or which make the fulfillment of this Agreement impracticable by EKOS.

EKOS - SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
6 | Page EKOS License Agreement Version 1.1.0524
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement under seal, or caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers, effective as of the last date ofsigning below (the “Effective Date”).

Customer EKOS, Inc.

By: (Printed Name) By: (Printed Name)
Customer Signature: Signature:

Title: Title:

Date: Date:

EXHIBIT A: CHANGE REQUEST FORM (for use to add or delete sites during the term of the agreement following license agreement execution) ADDENDUM NO. to the SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS ADDENDUM NO. (“Addendum”), dated is between EKOS, Inc, and CUSTOMER (as defined below) is for the sole purpose of adding, deleting, or changing Site information to the EKOS Software License Agreement dated , between EKOS and Customer (the “Agreement”). Except as modified by this addendum, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. EKOS and Customer desire to amend the Agreement as follows:

Add/ Change/
Terminate
Site
Number Site Name Site Street Address City, State, Zip Site Contact Site Phone # BILLING INFORMATION (Required for Processing)
Customer Name: Contact Name: Email:

Address: City: St: Zip:

Phone: Fax: Fed Tax ID:

All capitalized terms used herein, unless defined, shall have the same meanings set forth in the Agreement. This Addendum is incorporated into the Agreement and made a part thereof. If any term of this Addendum conflicts with the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this Addendum shall control. This Addendum may be executed (i) in counterparts, and/or (ii) through the use of an electronic signature.

By signing below, the parties have executed this Addendum by their duly authorized representatives as set forth below. This Addendum is effective as of the date fully executed.

Customer:

Signature:

Name:

Title:

Date:

EKOS, Inc.

Signature:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Return signed Addendum to EKOS Contract Services Team: Email: [email protected] Item No. 8.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Approval to Renew Microsoft Office 365 Government G1 Software Subscription
SOURCE: Finance
COMMENT: The Finance Department - Information Technology (IT) Division is requesting approval to renew the City's Microsoft Office 365 G1 Subscription, a cloudbased platform for email and calendaring systems. The current subscription expired on July 31st, 2025. Renewing the City's Office 365 G1 subscription will maintain the City's current email and calendaring services.

Staff received the following quote from CDW Government, LLC for the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement for a three-year term. This renewal will be executed under the existing Riverside Cooperative Master Agreement (Contract ITARC-00933), which provides favorable pricing terms. The quote outlines annual payments to CDW-G.

The agreement includes the following key components:

Description Quantity Price/Year
Office 365 G1 GCC (Email) 326 $34,425.60
Exchange Online GCC (Archiving) 326 $ 9,075.84
Power BI Pro GCC (Statistical Analysis) 1 $ 98.64
Annual Total $43,600.08
Total (Years 1-3) $130,800.24
The quote from CDW Government LLC is for a three-year term for a total of $130,800.24. Funding is available from the Equipment Replacement Fund. Any additional licenses during the agreement period will be funded through the requesting department's operating budget.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement for Office 365 Government G1 software subscription from CDW-G for a term of three years in the amount of $130,800.24.

Item No. 8.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. CDWG - EA Renewal Quote - 7.3.2025
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Janie Rodriguez, Finance Director
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager
Date 7/3/25
Account Manager Tommy Baxter
for VSL Specialist Brent Cameron
Channel Price Sheet Month June
Unless otherwise noted, All Quotes expire upon current month's end Microsoft Part # Description Level Quantity Price Extended Price Extended Price Extended J5U-00004 AzureprepaymentG ShrdSvr ALNG SubsVL MVL Commit Provision D 1 $0.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4ES-00001 EOA Exchange Online GCC Sub Per User D 326 $27.84 $ 9,075.84 $ 27.84 $ 9,075.84 $ 27.84 $ 9,075.84 U4S-00002 O365 G1 GCC Sub Per User D 326 $105.60 $ 34,425.60 $ 105.60 $ 34,425.60 $ 105.60 $ 34,425.60 DDJ-00001 Power BI Pro GCC Sub Per User D 1 $98.64 $ 98.64 $ 98.64 $ 98.64 $ 98.64 $ 98.64 NYH-00001 Teams AC with Dial Out US/CA GCC Sub Add-on D 326 $0.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Year 1 Total $ 43,600.08 Year 2 Total $ 43,600.08 Year 3 Total $ 43,600.08 Three Year Total $ 130,800.24
No Tax Referenced
RIVERSIDE CONTRACT: ITARC-00933
Current Enrollment # 86203424
Agreement End Date: 7/31/2025
Terms and Conditions of sales and services projects are governed by the terms at:
http://www.cdwg.com/content/terms-conditions/product-sales.aspx EA Quote
Customer to make three annual payments to CDW•G
CDW Government, LLC
Microsoft Enterprise 6.6 Agreement Pricing
Enterprise Quote
City of Porterville
Terms & Conditions
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Notes
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Re-Authorize Revised MOU to continue participation in Tulare-Kings County Regional Hazardous Materials Team
SOURCE: Fire
COMMENT: On 12/3/2024, the City Council approved the Memorandum of Understanding for the City’s Fire Department to continue participation in the Tulare-Kings County Regional Hazardous Materials Team. Continued participation is essential for maintaining the safety and preparedness of our community. After several of the MOUs were signed by the governing bodies in December of 2024/January 2025, two departments requested wording changes in the Cost Recovery Section. Due to the length of time to research and craft the proposed changes, they felt it was also applicable to extend the terms of the agreement to be effective from July,1 2025 through June 30, 2030.

No other terms or conditions changed in the MOU and the word changes is the Cost Recover Section have minimal impact as it just outlines in greater detail the avenues at which Cost Recovery process will be followed.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council re-approve the revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the updated amendments to
continue participation in the Tulare-Kings County Regional Hazardous Materials Team (RHM Team) and authorize the City Manager to sign the MOU for a five-year term beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2030.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Revised Hazmat MOU

2. Hazmat MOU Modification Explanation

3. Hazmat Agreement Exhibit A Cost Recovery
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Bryan Cogburn, Fire Chief
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager

CITY OF PORTERVILLE
By: ------------
City Manager
ATTEST:

By: ___________ _
Chief Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to Form
By:-----------
City Attorney
13 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA – AUGUST 5, 2025
SUBJECT: Request for Will Serve Letter - 1520 E. Success Drive SOURCE: Community Development
COMMENT: The subject property, located at 1520 E. Success Drive, is located in East Porterville, outside the city limits and within the city’s Urban Development Boundary. The property is currently developed with two single-family residential homes. The property received approval of an Extraterritorial Service Agreement (ESA) as an emergency water service connection through the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Emergency Connection Project for East Porterville, in which the subject property qualified as part of the East Porterville Feasibility Study Project Area. An application for an ESA was processed on September 15, 2016, and approved. The application included an Irrevocable Agreement for Annexation (IAA #31-01) and a Deed Restriction for future development, which document was recorded at the Tulare County Recorder’s office as Record Number 2017-0061522 on October 6, 2017. The applicant received approval in 2023 for a second water service for the development of a second residential dwelling unit under Resolution 55-2023.

BACKGROUND:

ANALYSIS: Staff received a request for a will server letter in order to provide a water service connection to existing property, for the development of an Accessory Dwelling Unit on the property. As a condition of water service connection through the Extraterritorial Service Agreement, a deed restriction was recorded that outlined, “no expansion or modification of this use, including conversion of structures or addition of habitable structures, may be permitted without approval of the City Council of the City of Porterville”.

Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 66310, et seq., the County is required to ministerially approve a proposed ADU. Correspondingly, the City is required to approve a water service to the proposed ADU, if requested.

ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW:

On July 21, 2025, the Environmental Coordinator made a determination that the project is exempt from CEQA as a ministerial project as it consists solely of the approval of an individual utility service connection (CEQA Guidelines § 15268(b)(4)).

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the draft resolution approving the water service connection for the ADU at 1520 E. Success Drive in East Porterville.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution

2. Extraterritorial Service Agreement 31-01

3. IAA Recorded 31-01

4. Locator Map

5. Site Plan
Appropriated/Funded:

Review By:

Department Director:

Claudia Calderon, Community Development Director
Final Approver: Richard Tree, Interim City Manager

Page 1 of 2 ends

Porterville City CouncilAugust 5, 2025

Porterville City Council
August 5, 2025