AGENDA REPORT CityofPoway
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Carrie Gallagher, City Clerk ~
(858) 668-4535 or [email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Approval of the August 16, 2022 and September 20, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes and the October 24, 2022 Special Meeting Minutes Summary
The City Council Meeting Minutes submitted hereto for approval are:
• August 16, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
• September 20, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes • October 24, 2022 Special Meeting Minutes
The Poway City Council sits as the Poway Planning Commission, the Poway Housing Authority, the Public Financing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council approve August 16, 2022 and September 20, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes and October 24, 2022 Special Meeting Minutes Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. August 16, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes B. September 20, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes C. October 24, 2022 Special Meeting Minutes
Reviewed/Approved By:
Wendaserman
Assistant City Manager
1 of 15
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
November 15, 2022, Item #2
NOTE: These draft meeting minutes are not official until approved by the City Council at the next scheduled meeting .
CITY OF POWAY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
August 16, 2022
City Council Chambers
13325 Civic Center Drive, Poway, California
(Per Government Code 54953)
(Meeting Called to Order as City Council/City of Poway Planning Commission/Poway Housing Authority/Public Financing Authority and Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency)
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Vaus called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Barry Leonard, Caylin Frank, Dave Grosch, John Mullin, Steve Vaus
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT
City Manager Chris Hazeltine; Assistant City Manager Wendy Kaserman; City Attorney Alan Fenstermacher; Development Services Director Bob Manis; Human Resources and Risk Management Director Jodene Dunphy; Finance Director Aaron Beanan; Director of Public Works Eric Heidemann; Director of Community Services Audrey Denham; Fire Chief Jeff Chumbley; Captain Karla Menzies, Sheriff's Department
(Note: Hereinafter the titles Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Councilmember, City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk and Director of Finance shall be used to indicate Mayor/Chair, Deputy MayorNice Chair, Councilmember/D irector, City Manager/Executive Director, Assistant City Manager/Assistant Executive Director, City Attorney/Counsel, City Clerk/Secretary and Director of Finance/Finance Officer.)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Deputy Mayor Mullin led the Pledge of Allegiance.
MOMENT OF SILENCE
Mayor Vaus led a moment of silence.
PRESENT A TIO NS
None.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Murray Bankhead spoke regarding the Poway Rodeo and encouraged participation. 2 of 15 ATTACHMENT A
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes -August 16, 2022
Yuri Bohlen promoted the upcoming Mossy Nissan blood drive sponsored by the Red Cross.
Tammy Slater spoke regarding resident request to have a gate installed at South Metate Trail head.
Sandra Butterfield (via teleconference) spoke in opposition to the proposed closure of Palomar Health Geriatric Psychiatric Unit.
Jon Gador (via teleconference) spoke in opposition to the proposed closure of Palomar Health Geriatric Psychiatric Unit.
Ladybug McFly (via teleconference) spoke regarding LGBTQIA matters.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Vaus pulled Items 5 and 7 for discussion.
Motioned by Deputy Mayor Mullin, seconded by Councilmember Frank to approve Consent Calendar Items 1 through 4 and 6. Motion carried 510 by the following roll-call vote:
Ayes: Leonard, Frank, Grosch, Mullin, Vaus
Noes: None
Abstained: None
Absent: None
Disqualified: None
Deputy Mayor Mullin recused himself from items 5 and 7, noting the applicant is a source of income for a business in which he owns interest. He exited the dais at 7: 17 p.m.
Motioned by Councilmember Leonard, seconded by Councilmember Grosch to approve Consent Calendar Items 5 and 7. Motion carried 411 by the following roll-call vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstained:
Absent:
Disqualified:
Leonard, Frank, Grosch, Vaus
None
None
None
Mullin
Deputy Mayor Mullin returned to the dais at 7:52 p.m.
1. Approval of Reading by Title Only and Waiver of Reading in Full of Ordinances on this Agenda
2. Adoption of Resolution No. 22-061 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Finding and Declaring the Continued Existence of an Emergency within the City due to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Global Pandemic"
3. Adoption of Resolution No. 22-062 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute, On Behalf of the City, An Inter Agency Service Agreement with the Palomar Community College District" 3 of 15
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes -August 16, 2022
4. City's Investment Report as of June 30, 2022
5. Approval of Final Map for Tentative Tract Map 16-005 (Lyon Estates Subdivision); Tyler Sandstrom, Applicant (APNs: 314-370-05-00 and 314-032-01-00) Lori Grennan spoke regarding conservation and in opposition to item 5.
Shari Dunbar spoke regarding conservation and in opposition to item 5.
Jeffrey Schmidt (via teleconference) spoke regarding conservation and in opposition to item
5. 6. Award Acceptance of the FY 21-22 Water Valve Replacement Project; Bid No. 22-003, with M-Rae Engineering, Inc., as Complete
7. Adoption of Resolution No. 22-063 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Accepting Real Property at the East End of Larchmont Street Lying Within County of San Diego Tract Map 2865-5, Map No. 7578"
Billy Sheldon spoke regarding blasting concerns, trail safety hazards and in opposition to item 7.
8. Adoption of Resolution No. 22-064 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Approving and Authorizing Deposit and Withdrawal of Monies on Behalf of the City of Poway in the Local Agency Investment Fund"
9. Adoption of Resolution No. 22-065 entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency, Approving and Authorizing Deposit and Withdrawal of Monies on Behalf of the Successor Agency in the Local Agency Investment Fund"
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
None.
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
10. Resolution Adopting the Report on City's Water Quality Relative to Public Health Goals for 2019-2021
Mayor Vaus opened the public hearing 7:52 p.m.
Assistant Director of Public Works-Utilities Troy DePriest presented the item along with a PowerPoint presentation.
4 of 15
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes - August 16, 2022
Public Comment:
Yuri Bohlen spoke regarding Public Health Goals (PHG's), the length of the clinical trials and suggested consideration of a healthier treatment option then chemicals.
End of Public Comment.
Mayor Vaus closed the public hearing at 8:00 p.m.
Council discussion ensued.
Motioned by Mayor Vaus, seconded by Deputy Mayor Mullin to adopt Resolution No. 22-066 entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Adopting the Report on the City's Water Quality Relative to Public Health Goals for 2019-2021". Motion carried unanimously.
STAFF REPORTS:
11. Safe Poway Program Introduction and Authorization
Assistant City Manager Wendy Kaserman introduced the item, followed by a PowerPoint presentation by Captain Mike Rand of the San Diego Sheriffs Department. Ms. Kaserman noted the City of Poway's long partnership with the San Diego County Sheriffs Department, and added that together, the two agencies are constantly looking for new and innovative tools to help enhance safety, prevent crime, and give law enforcement more tools to investigate and prosecute. The proposed program has two primary components, one which include visible cameras placed throughout the City as a deterrent and the second provides the option to businesses and residents to voluntarily provide access to their personal video either live or recorded. Ms. Kaserman noted this is the Sheriff Department's program and the City may wish to add more cameras than the Sheriffs Department will provide and/or license plate reader technology, an appropriation request of up to $35,000 would cover these cost.
Captain Mike Rand of the San Diego Sheriffs Department reiterated Ms. Kaserman's report, he noted program benefits to the City and its residents, he discussed a successful pilot program in the City of Lemon Grove and provided details on camera equipment.
Public Comment:
Yuri Bohlen spoke in support of the Safe Poway Program.
End of Public Comment.
At the request of Council, Captain Rand discussed video footage storage, he noted footage would only be accessible to Sheriff Department staff He added that 5 cameras are included in the program with an option add more.
Mayor Vaus proposed the creation of a City Council subcommittee consisting of himself and Councilmember Frank that will assist with disseminating information about the program to residents and businesses.
Motioned by Mayor Vaus, seconded by Councilmember Leonard to approve the City's participation in the Sheriff's Safe Poway Program, authorize the City Manager in 5 of 15
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes - August 16, 2022
conjunction with the subcommittee consisting of Mayor Vaus and Councilmember Frank to execute the related Memorandum of Understanding with the Sheriff's Department, and authorize the appropriation of up to $35k to fund additional cameras/technology not funded by the Sheriff's Department. Motion passed unanimously.
12. Comprehensive Sign Permit (CSP) 22-0003; a request to allow three freestanding signs greater than eight feet in height (up to 11 feet) for Palomar Medical Center located at 15611 and 15615 Pomerado Road; APN: 275-461-15 / 275-461-14
Associate Planner JohnWilly Aglupos presented the item with a PowerPoint presentation.
Public Comment:
None.
End of Public Comment.
Council discussion ensued.
Motioned by Councilmember Frank, seconded by Councilmember Leonard to adopt Resolution No. 22-067 entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Approving Comprehensive sign Permit 22-0003 to Allow Three Freestanding Signs Greater than Eight Feet in Height; Assessor's Parcel Number 275- 461-15 / 275-461-14. Motion passed unanimously.
13. Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement and Right of Entry and License Agreement Between the Poway Housing Authority and Wakeland Housing & Development Corporation for the Monte Vista Affordable Housing Development Project (APN 275-460-61) Senior Management Analyst Marie Sanders presented the item with a PowerPoint presentation, followed by a presentation by Chief Executive Officer of Wakeland Housing and Development Company Rebecca Louie. Ms. Sanders stated the project is for the construction of 60 affordable rental units, targeting developmentally disabled adults, military veterans, and their families. She provided the site location, size, zoning requirement and noted surrounding businesses. Ms. Sanders explained the process to solicit proposals as a two-phase process and noted requirements. She added, after careful review of all submittals, including financing strategies and project designs, staff felt Wakeland presented a vision that best aligned with the desires of the Poway Housing Authority Board (Board). If negotiations are successful, staff anticipates bringing the Disposition and Development Agreement to the Board for consideration in the second quarter of 2023. Ms. Sanders added both the Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement and the right of entry agreement have been updated to reflect mutually accepted modifications. Most notably, the initial negotiation period has been extended from 180 days to 270 days with two 245 Day extensions.
Chief Executive Officer of Wakeland Housing and Development Company Rebecca Louie stated the enormous need for such a project in Poway, she reiterated the size of the project and the population it would benefit and serve. She noted their partnership with Interfaith Community Services.
Public Comment:
6 of 15
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes -August 16, 2022
Tony Rubino (via teleconference) spoke in support of the project.
End of Public Comment.
In response to Council questioning, Ms. Louie stated all affordable housing funding is competitive and the current funding plan is very realistic, she added she believes the financing will happen without delay. Ms. Louie agreed at the request of Deputy Mayor Mullin to have her team meet with community member Tony Rubino to discuss his vision for the common areas of the project in anticipation of making the common areas more inviting to the community. Ms. Louie noted plans for a Resident Service Plan Coordinator to be on staff to organize the services amongst the different resident groups including service advisor appointments and special resident events. She agreed to consider making the units available to widowed spouses of military members .
Development Services Director Bob Manis stated the land has been donated to the project in addition to City Attorney time.
City Council concurred this is an important project with the right partners in Wakeland Housing and Development Company noting a stylish design and underground parking for 138 vehicles which will allow for open space within the community.
Motioned by Authority Director Mullin, seconded by Authority Director Grosch to 1) Approve the updated Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement and Right of Entry and License Agreement with Wakeland; 2) Authorize the Executive Director to execute all necessary documents; and 3) Authorize the appropriation of $51,500 from the Housing Authority Fund (2900) to the Monte Vista Housing Site Project (MS012). Motion passed unanimously.
WORKSHOPS
None.
COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEMS:
None.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS and ANNOUNCEMENTS: Pursuant to AB1234 - (G.C. 53232(d))
Deputy Mayor Mullin expressed his gratitude to Battalion Chief Ortiz and the Poway Firefighters for including himself and his grandson in a station tour and ride along.
Mayor Vaus wished a fond farewell to City Engineer Melody Rocco.
CITY MANAGER ITEMS
None.
CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS (Including any public report of any action taken in closed session) None.
7 of15
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes -August 16, 2022
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:28 p.m.
8 of 15
Carrie Gallagher, CMC
City Clerk
City of Poway , California
November 15, 2022, Item #2
NOTE: These draft meeting minutes are not official until approved by the City Council at the next scheduled meeting .
CITY OF POWAY
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
September 20, 2022
City Council Chambers
13325 Civic Center Drive, Poway, California
(Per Government Code 54953)
(Meeting Called to Order as City Council/City of Poway Planning Commission/Poway Housing Authority/Public Financing Authority and Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency)
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Vaus called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Barry Leonard, Caylin Frank, Dave Grosch, John Mullin, Steve Vaus
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT
City Manager Chris Hazeltine (via teleconference); Assistant City Manager Wendy Kaserman; City Attorney Alan Fenstermacher; City Clerk Carrie Gallagher; Finance Director Aaron Beanan; Human Resources and Risk Management Director Jodene Dunphy; Director of Public Works Eric Heidemann; Director of Community Services Audrey Denham; Lt. John Buckley, Sheriffs Department.
(Note: Hereinafter the titles Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Councilmember, City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk and Director of Finance shall be used to indicate Mayor/Chair, Deputy MayorNice Chair, Councilmember/Director, City Manager/Executive Director, Assistant City Manager/Assistant Executive Director, City Attorney/Counsel, City Clerk/Secretary and Director of Finance/Finance Officer.)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Girl Scout Troop 2169 from Midland Elementary School led the Pledge of Allegiance.
MOMENT OF SILENCE
Mayor Vaus led a moment of silence.
PRESENTATIONS
National Preparedness Month Presentation
9 of 15 ATTACHMENT B
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes - September 20, 2022
PUBLIC COMMENT
Terri Sorensen introduced Poway Neighborhood Emergency Corp. (PNEC) new Public Information Officer Jaytee Cruz. Mr. Cruz provided updates on upcoming events.
Yuri Bohlen thanked the Poway Fire Department for exceptional service during a recent fire on Metate mountain top.
Chris Olps spoke regarding the residency status of Councilmember Grosch.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Motioned by Councilmember Frank, seconded by Councilmember Grosch to approve Consent Calendar Items 1 through 6. Motion carried 5/0 by the following roll-call vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstained:
Absent:
Disqualified:
Leonard, Frank, Grosch, Mullin, Vaus
None
None
None
None
1. Approval of Reading by Title Only and Waiver of Reading in Full of Ordinances on this Agenda
2. Approval of the June 21, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
3. Adoption of Resolution No. 22-068 entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Finding and Declaring the Continued Existence of an Emergency within the City due to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Global Pandemic"
4. Acceptance of the Springvale and Carlson Channel Rehabilitation Project; Bid No. 22-006 with Wright Construction Engineering Corp, as Complete
5. Approval of Amendments to the Contracts for the Sale and Purchase of Goods and Materials with Carus LLC, Hill Brothers Chemical Company, and JCI Jones, Inc. for the Purchase of Water Treatment Plant Chemicals; RFB No. 21-023
Yuri Bohlen spoke regarding item #5, requesting safer alternatives to drinking water.
6. Award of Contract to SOC Engineering Inc. for the FY 2021-22 Accessibility Improvements - Community Park Pathways Project; Bid No. 23-003
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
None.
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
None.
10 of 15
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes - September 20, 2022
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 22-0002; a proposal to establish an indoor recreation facility within an existing 19,000 square-foot building located at 12900 Gregg Court; APN: 317-270- 63 Mayor Vaus opened the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m.
Associate Planner Hector Salgado presented the report along with a PowerPoint presentation.
He stated the proposed location is a vacant retail establishment and provided size, location, zoning, existing land use, and noted existing nearby businesses. Mr. Salgado noted the proposed amusement activities will include food and drink service; he gave hours of operation noting the applicant will have the option to expand on them. Additionally, Mr. Salgado stated there were no proposed exterior modifications other than signage and included that the current parking spots exceed the required number for the location and use.
Public Comment:
Yuri Bohlen spoke in support of the proposed project and filing vacant buildings.
End of Public Comment.
Mayor Vaus closed the Public Hearing at 7:21 p.m.
Council discussion ensued.
Motioned by Councilmember Frank, seconded by Councilmember Leonard to adopt Resolution No. 22-069 entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 22-0002 to Establish an Indoor Recreation Facility at 12900 Gregg Court; Assessor's Parcel Number 317-270-63".
Motion carried unanimously.
STAFF REPORTS:
8. Revisions to Full Time Equivalent (FTE) counts in the Finance Department and Community Services Department, Two New Position Classifications added to the City of Poway Position Classification Plan, an Update to the Temporary Employee Salary Schedule to Comply with California Minimum Wage Requirements and Updates to Related Salary Schedules Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Director Jodene Dunphy presented the item. She explained the proposed revisions, the two new position classifications, and updates to related salary schedules as needed to comply with the minimum wage requirements effective January 1, 2023. Ms. Dunphy stated the item before Council demonstrates a commitment to ensuring effective organization of City resources in order to provide the highest quality services and programs to meet the needs of the Poway community. She provided estimated annual cost increases per position and noted for the current fiscal year most costs will be covered by salary savings due to vacancies. The exception being the Community Services positions supporting older adult programing.
Public Comment:
11 of 15
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes - September 20, 2022
None.
End of Public Comment.
Council discussion ensued regarding the addition of positions specifically to support enhanced older adult programming. Current funding is made possible by a generous donation from the Friends of Poway Seniors.
Motioned by Mayor Vaus, seconded by Deputy Mayor Mullin to adopt Resolution No. 22-070 entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Adding a Net 2.09 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Positions in the Finance and Community Services Departments, Approving Two New Classifications on the City of Poway Position Classification Plan, and Approving the Management/Confidential Salary Schedule", and Resolution No. 22-071 entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Approving the Part-Time Temporary/Seasonal Wage Schedule and the Non-Safety Salary Schedule". Motion carried unanimously.
WORKSHOPS
None.
COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEMS:
None.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS and ANNOUNCEMENTS: Pursuant to AB1234 - (G.C. 53232(d))
Councilmember Leonard inquired on adding City Council compensation onto a future agenda. He received Council consensus with the exception of Mayor Vaus who recused himself.
Mayor Vaus recused himself on this topic and exited the dais at 7:40 p.m., he returned at 7:45 p.m.
Councilmember Leonard provided information on the Poway Rodeo and noted the Kiwanis will be in attendance to volunteer at the Kids Zone.
Councilmember Frank encouraged attendance at the upcoming Poway Chamber of Commerce Fall Festival to be held October 2, 2022.
Councilmember Grosch thanked the Poway Fire Department for their quick and professional service during a recent personal emergency situation involving his wife, additionally he addressed an earlier public comment regarding residency concerns.
CITY MANAGER ITEMS
None.
Mayor Vaus recessed the meeting into Closed Session at 7:50 p.m.
CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS (Including any public report of any action taken in closed session)
9. Conference with Real Property Negotiator (Gov. Code § 54956.8) 12 of 15
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes - September 20, 2022
Property: APN 278-450-2700
City Negotiator: City Manager Chris Hazeltine
Persons with whom the City Negotiator May Negotiate : Ron Little, Associate Superintendent, Business Support SeNices, Poway Unified School District Under Negotiation: Terms of Use
City Attorney Fenstermacher stated, no reportable action.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:22 p.m.
13 of 15
Carrie Gallagher, CMC
City Clerk
City of Poway, California
November 15, 2022, Item #2
CITY OF POWAY
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
CLOSED SESSION
October 24, 2022
City Council Chambers
13325 Civic Center Drive, Poway, California
(Per Government Code 54953)
(Meeting Called to Order as City Council/City of Poway Planning Commission/Poway Housing Authority/Public Financing Authority and Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency)
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Vaus called the Special Meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Barry Leonard, Dave Grosch, John Mullin, Steve Vaus
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT
City Manager Chris Hazeltine; Assistant City Manager Wendy Kaserman; City Attorney Alan Fenstermacher (via teleconference), Director of Community Services Audrey Denham
PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
None.
COUNCIL-INITIATED ITEMS
None.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS and ANNOUNCEMENTS: Pursuant to AB1234 - (G.C. 53232(d))
None.
CITY MANAGER ITEMS:
None.
14 of 15 ATTACHMENT C
November 15, 2022, Item #2
City of Poway - Minutes - October 24, 2022
CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS: (Including any public report of any action taken in closed session)
CLOSED SESSION
1. Conference with Real Property Negotiator (Gov. Code § 54956.8) Property: APN 278-450-2700
City Negotiator: City Manager Chris Hazeltine
Persons with whom the City Negotiator May Negotiate : Ron Little, Associate Superintendent, Business Support Services, Poway Unified School District Under Negotiation: Terms of Use
City Council came out of Closed Session at 4:16 p.m. and City Attorney Fenstermacher reported: By a 4-0 vote, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the Joint Use Agreement with the Poway Unified School District for the Poway Center for the Performing Arts, as revised by the PUSD Board of Education at their October 13, 2022 public meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 4: 17 p. m.
15 of 15
Carrie Gallagher, CMC
City Clerk
City of Poway, California
November 15, 2022, Item #2
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA RE PO RT City of Poway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jeff Chumbley, Fire Chief OJ)Jl/
Jeff Chumbley, Fire Chief f
(858) 668-4461 or jchumbley@poway .org
CITY COUNCIL
Resolution to Continue the Existence of a Local Emergency Within the City of Poway Due to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Global Pandemic The Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic continues to impact economic and social segments of the United States. Federal, state, and county direct ives, mandates and orders to manage COVI D-19 have, and continue to, impact Poway residents, businesses and visitors. On March 18, 2020, the City Council approved a resolution proclaiming a local emergency. The adopted resolution requires the City Council to either continue the emergency action or declare the emergency ended at each regular meeting.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council approve a resolution continuing the Proclamation of Local Emergency. This action requires a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council.
Discussion:
The COVID-19 global pandemic continues to impact business, education, healthcare, military, and social segments of the United States. Federal, state, and county directives, mandates, orders and guidelines have been issued to manage COVID-19. Efforts continue to focus on re-opening the economy and relaxing restrictions. In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic , and its impact on Poway, the City Manager, serving as Director of Emergency Services fo r the City of Poway, proclaimed a local emergency on March 13, 2020. On March 18, 2020, the City Council approved Resolution No. 20-013 ratifying the City Manager's Proclamation of Local Emergency. The City Council approved to continue the emergency action in 2020 on April 7, April 21, May 5, May 19, June 2, June 16, July 7, July 21 , August 4, September 1, September 15, October 6, October 20, November 17, December 1, and December 15. In 2021, the City Council approved to continue the emergency action on January 19, February 2, February 16, March 2, March 16, April 6, Apri l 20, May 4, May 18, June 1, June 15, July 20, August 3, August 17, September 7, October 5, October 19, November 2, November 16, and December
7. In 2022, the City Council approved to continue the emergency action on January 18, February 1, February 15, March 1, March 15, April 5, April 19, May 3, May 17, June 7, June 21, July 19, August 2, 1 of 5
November 15, 2022, Item #3
August 16, September 20, October 4 and October 18. The adopted resolution requires the City Council to either continue the emergency action or declare the emergency ended at each regular meeting .
Continuing the local emergency, in addition to being consistent with the County of San Diego, also allows the City to continue to be eligible for federal, state, and county funding opportunities related to COVID-19 and tied to having a declaration of a local emergency in place. Based on a recent announcement by the State of California that it plans to end the COVID-19 State of Emergency on · February 28, 2023, the City plans to end it's local emergency at the February 21, 2023 City Council Meeting.
Environmental Review:
This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Fiscal Impact:
As of November 1, 2022, City costs to respond to COVID-19 are estimated at $1,120,760. These costs specifically relate to FEMA eligible expenditures. The total fiscal impact is unknown at this time . Per the City Council adopted General Fund Reserve policy, the City maintains a General Fund Reserve of 45 percent of the budgeted annual General Fund operating expenditures, or $20,393,896 as of June 30, 2021. Within that 45 percent, $13,179,618 is set aside for Extreme Events/Public Safety. Staff believes some of the prior expenditures are recoverable under State and Federal Disaster programs. Amounts recovered under these programs will be used to replenish the General Fund reserve. Pursuant to the reserve policy, staff will return with a plan to replenish any General Fund reserves not replenished under a State or Federal Disaster program. Staff will recommend applicable budget adjustments prior to the completion of the current fiscal year.
In addition to using reserves to respond to COVID-19, as mentioned above, on April 20, 2020, the City Council approved $2,000,000 to fund the PEARL program for small businesses. The PEARL program's goal was to offer financial assistance to small businesses located in Poway by serving as a financial bridge to businesses while they were awaiting state and federal funding provided in response to the pandemic. Based on staffs review, 35 loans totaling $1,328,118 were approved and four loans totaling $148,000 have been repaid. The reserve fund will be replenished from the repayment of PEARL loans over a three-year period following the end of the local COVID-19 emergency. This period falls within the General Fund Reserve Policy's direction to fully replenish reserves within five years of use.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Resolution
B. Proclamation of Local Emergency
Reviewed/Approved By:
Assistant City Manager
2 of 5
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved B:t
Ch~
City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #3
RESOLUTION NO. 22-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DECLARING THE
CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF AN EMERGENCY WITHIN THE
CITY DUE TO THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) GLOBAL
PANDEMIC
WHEREAS, the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic in the City of Poway, commencing on or about January 24, 2020 that creates a threat to public health and safety; WHEREAS , Government Code section 8630 and Poway Municipal Code (PMC) Section
2.12.060 empower the City Manager, acting as the Director of Emergency Services, to proclaim the existence of a local emergency when the City is affected by a public calamity, and the City Council is not in session;
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2020, the City Manager, acting pursuant to Government Code section 8630 and PMC section 2.12.060, proclaimed the existence of a local emergency based on conditions of extreme peril to the health and safety of persons caused by the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic;
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020, the City Council, acting pursuant to Government Code section 8630 and PMC section 2.12.065, ratified the existence of a local emergency within seven (7) days of a Proclamation of Local Emergency by the City Manager; WHEREAS, the City Council, acting pursuant to PMC section 2.12.065, approved extending the emergency declaration during regularly scheduled meetings in 2020 on April 7, April 21, May 5, May 19, June 2, June 16, July 7, July 21, August 4, September 1, September 15, October 6, October 20, November 17, December 1, December 15, and in 2021 on January 19, February 2, February 16, March 2, March 16, April 6, April 20, May 4, May 18, June 1, June 15, July 20, August 3, August 17, September 7, October 5, October 19, November 2, November 16, December 7, and in 2022 on January 18, February 1, February 15, March 1, March 15, April 5, · April 19, May 3, May 17, June 7, June 21, July 19, August 2, August 16, September 20, October 4 and October 18;
WHEREAS, Public Contract Code Section 20168 provides that the City Council may pass by four-fifths (4/5) vote, a resolution declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property; WHEREAS, upon adoption of such resolution, the City Manager may expend any sum required in the emergency and report the same to the City Council in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050;
WHEREAS, if such expenditure is ordered, the City Council shall review the emergency action at each regular meeting, to determine if there is a need to continue the action or if the Proclamation of Local Emergency may be terminated ; and WHEREAS, such the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic constitute an emergency within the terms of Public Contract Code Sections 20168 and 22050 which requires that the City Manager be able to act quickly and without complying with the notice and bidding procedures of the Public Contract Code to safeguard life, health, or property. 3 of 5 ATTACHMENT A
November 15, 2022, Item #3
Resolution No. 22-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway hereby finds and declares:
SECTION 1: An emergency continues to exist within the City as the result of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic; and
(a) The continuing threat of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic requires that the City be able to expend public money in order to safeguard life, health, or property;
(b) The City Manager, as the City's Personnel Officer, is authorized to take actions necessary to alter employee leave policies and ensure a safe and healthy workforce;
(c) The City Manager is authorized to safeguard life, health, or property without complying with notice or bidding procedures; and (d) Once such expenditure is made, the City Manager shall report the conditions to the City Council at each regular meeting, at which time the City Council shall either continue the emergency action or declare the emergency ended.
SECTION 2: This Proclamation of Local Emergency and all subsequent resolutions in connection herewith shall require a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 15th day of November, 2022 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
Steve Vaus, Mayor
ATTEST:
Carrie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
4 of 5
November 15, 2022, Item #3
PROCLAMATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, section 2.12.060 of the Poway Municipal Code empowers the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity and the City Council is not in session;
WHEREAS, the City Manager, as Director of Emergency Services of the City of Poway, does hereby find that conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City of Poway, caused by the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) commencing on January 24, 2020;
WHEREAS, that the City Council of the City of Poway is not in session and cannot immediately be called into session; and
WHEREAS, this Proclamation of Local Emergency will be ratified by the City Council within seven days of being issued.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED by the Director of Emergency Services for the City of Poway, that a local emergency now exists throughout the City and that said local emergency shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council;
IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED that during the existence of said local emergency the powers, functions, and duties of the emergency organization of this City shall be those prescribed by state law, ordinances, and resolutions of this City, and by the City of Poway Emergency Plan; and
IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED that a copy of this Proclamation of Local Emergency be forwarded to the State Director of the Governor's Office of Emergency Services with a request that; .
1. The State Director find the Proclamation of Local Emergency acceptable in accordance with provisions of the Natural Disaster Assistance Act; and
2. The State Director forward this Proclamation, and request for a State Proclamation and Presidential Declaration of Emergency, to the Governor of California for consideration and action.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Director of Emergency Services for the City of Poway this 13th day of March 2020.
Director of Emergency Services
5 ofS ATTACHMENT B
November 15, 2022, Item #3
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA REPORT CityofPoway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Robert Manis, Director of Development Services~
Henry Trang, Senior Civil Engineer ~·~
(858) 668-4602 or [email protected]
Approval of the Local Road Safety Plan
CITY COUNCIL
The Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) is a report that systemat ically ident ifies and analyzes safety problems and recommends safety improvements on the City's roadways. An LRSP will be required for an agency to be eligible to apply for future federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds.
Having an approved LRSP will position the City for applying for future HSIP grants .
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council receive and approve the Local Road Safety Plan (Attachment A).
Discussion:
Federal regulations require each state to have a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). An SHSP is a statewide data-driven traffic safety plan that coordinates the effo rts of a wide range of organizations to reduce traffic accident fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. While the SHSP is used as a statewide approach for improving roadway safety, a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) can be a means for providing local and rural road owners with an opportunity to address unique highway safety needs in their jurisdictions while contributing to the success of the SHSP. The California Traffic Commission allocated state funds for the purpose of assisting local agencies in developing their LRSPs. The City applied for and was awarded $52,000 for the preparation of an LRSP. An LRSP will be a prerequisite · for future Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant applications .
The LRSP systematically identifies and analyzes safety problems and recommends safety improvements on the City's roadways. It facilitates collaboration through the development of partnerships between the City and stakeholders. The LRSP offers a proactive approach to addressing roadway safety needs in Poway. It not only focuses on engineering improvements to mitigate crashes, but also addresses safety improvements in other areas such as enforcement, education, and emergency services.
1 of73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
The City issued a Request for Proposals for the LRSP on March 18, 2021 and received a total of five proposals . The fees for the project ranged from $52,000 to $60,000. After careful review of the proposals, staff determined that KOA Corporation (KOA) was highly qualified and the most cost effective proposal. The City Council approved the Consultant Agreement with KOA for the preparation of the LRSP at the May 18, 2021 City Council meeting . KOA began the preparation of the LRSP in June 2021 and completed the report in March 2022. The results of the LRSP are summarized below with a prioritized list of improvements and actions.
The LRSP includes input from stakeholders including the San Diego County Sheriff Department, Palomar Hospital, Poway Unified School District, and City of Poway Fire, Public Works, and Development Services Departments to identify their goals and key safety issues and concerns. The goals include:
Saving lives and preventing serious injuries on local roads Reducing the severity of collisions through reduction in travel speed Providing the needed infrastructure to address higher collision locations Addressing distracted driving or driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol Improving safety in school zones
Improving driver awareness of speeding, texting, and drinking while driving A collision analysis was conducted for all reported crashes that occurred on local Poway roadways within city limits for a five-year time period between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. Collision data for the year 2020 and 2021 was reviewed but not included in the statistical analysis, as changes in travel from COVID-19 did not reflect typical travel conditions . The collisions were evaluated for crash type, frequency, severity, transportation mode, and property damage.
Intersections and roadway segments were ranked based on the collision data analysis. The highest crash intersections and roadway segments were further evaluated to determine contributing factors to the high-crash activity. Crash activity was compared to roadway characteristics such as volume, roadway cross-sections, speed limits, intersection control, and other features that might impact safety outcomes. Potential safety countermeasures were identified to address these conditions as well as other observed conditions for these locations. The list of potential countermeasures include:
Improve signal hardware
Improve signal timing
Provide advanced dilemma zone detection
Install flashing beacons as advance warning
Install raised medians
Install/upgrade larger or additional warning/regulatory signs or markings The LRSP was presented to the Traffic Safety Committee at the May 11, 2022 meeting with the recommendation that the Committee support the LRSP. The recommendation was unanimously approved by the Committee members.
The LRSP provides a foundation for developing and prioritizing future road safety improvement projects . It provides recommendations for future projects but does not obligate the City to implement them. An approved LRSP will enable the City to apply for grants for traffic related issues in the future. 2 of73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
Environmental Review:
This item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Fiscal Impact:
None with this action. However, if the City pursues any of the suggested improvements, staff would return to City Council for their consideration and approval.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Local Roadway Safety Plan
Reviewed/Approved By:
Assistant City Manager
3 of73
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #4
City of Poway
LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN
FINAL REPORT MARCH 2022
Prepared for:
City of Poway
Prepared By:
KOA Corporation
~A
5095 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 330, San Diego , CA 92123. Ph: (858) 300-8960 4of73 ATTACHMENT A
November 15, 2022, Item #4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 PURPOSE OF THE LRSP ............................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 PUBLIC INPUT ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
1.3.1 PROJECT GOALS ... : .......................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.3.2 SAFETY ISSUES AND CONCERNS .................................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 COLLISION SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 METHODOLOGY 4
2.1 COLLISION DATA SOURCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
2. 1.1 SWITRS ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1.2 TIMS ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4
2.1.2 OTS ....................................................................................................................................................................•............. 4
2.2 IDENTIFYING LOCATIONS FOR ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES .................................................................... .4
2.2.1 RANKING FUNCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.2.2 AVERAGE CRASH FREQUENCY ........................................................................................................................................ 5
2.2.3 CRASH RATE .................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.2.4 EDPO SCORE ................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.3 PROPOSING ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES .......................................................................................................... 6
3.0 COLLISION ANALYSIS 7
3.1 CITYWIDE COLLISION DATA ..................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.1.1 CRASHES BY YEAR ........................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.1.2 CRASH TYPE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 8
3.1.3 CRASH CAUSES ............................................................................................................................................................... 9
3.1 .4 CRASH INVOLVED WITH ............................................................................................................................................... 10
3.1.5 LIGHTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 11
3.1.6 PEDESTRIAN CRASHES .................................................................................................................................................. 11
3.1.7 AGE DISTRIBUTION OF AT-FAULT PARTIES .................................................................................................................. 12
3.2 COMPARISON WITH CITIES OF SIMILAR SIZE ................................................................................................................. 12
3.3 FOCUSED CRASH NETWORK ................................................................................................................................................. 13
3.3.1 INTERSECTIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 13
3.3.2 CRASH CORRIDORS ...................................................................................................................................................... 14
4.0 INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES 16
4.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................................. 16
4.2 CRASH INTERSECTION LOCATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 16
4.2.1 INTERSECTIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 18 SCRIPPS POWAY PARKWAY & COMMUNITY ROAD ............................................................................................. 18 POMERADO ROAD & TWIN PEAKS ROAD/ CAMINO DEL NORTE ...................................................................... 19 POWAY ROAD & POMERADO ROAD .................................................................................................................... 21 November 15, 2022, Item #4
TWIN PEAKS ROAD & COMMUNITY ROAD/ HILLNDALE WAY ........................................................................... 22 TED WILLIAMS PARKWAY & POMERADO ROAD ................................................................................................. .24 POWAY ROAD & MIDLAND ROAD ...........................................................................................................•........... .25 TWIN PEAKS ROAD & MIDLAND ROAD ............................................................................................................... .26 POWAY ROAD & ESPOLA ROAD .......................................................................................................................... .28 POWAY ROAD & COMMUNITY ROAD ................................................................................................................. .29 SCRIPPS POWAY PARKWAY & POMERADO ROAD .............................................................................................. .31
4.2.2 ROADWAY SEGMENT .................................................................................................................................................... 32 POWAY ROAD - OAK KNOLL ROAD TO GARDEN ROAD ..................................................................................... .32
4.3 POTENTIAL SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES ........................................................................................................................ 33
5.0 COUNTERMEASURES 34
5.1 COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................... 34
5.2 COUNTERMEASURE APPLICATION ..................................................................................................................................... 35
6.0 NON-ENGINEERING SAFETY SOLUTIONS 40
6.1 YOUNG DRIVERS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 40
6.2 BICYCLISTS ................................................................................................................................................................................... .40
6.3 PEDESTRIANS ............................................................................................................................................................................... 41
6.4 SPEEDING ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 42
6.5 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE ....................................................................................................................................... .42
6.6 DISTRACTED DRIVING .............................................................................................................................................................. 43
6.7 EMERGENCY RESPONSE MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................................... .43
7.0 PROJECT EVALUATION 44
7.1 HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) ............................................................................................... ..44
7.2 EXAMPLE HSIP PROJECTS ....................................................................................................................................................... .44
7.2.1 ADVANCE DILEMMA ZONE DETECTION ..................................................................................................................... .44
7.2.1 SIGNAL TIMING ............................................................................................................................................................ .45
7.3 FUNDING SOURCES .................................................................................................................................................................. .45
8.0 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) EVALUATION 48
November 15, 2022, Item #4
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1.1 POWAY CITYWIDE COLLISION MAP (2015-2019) ........................................................................................................ 3 FIGURE 3-1 COLLISION SEVERITY ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 FIGURE 3-3 COLLISION TYPE ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 FIGURE 3-4 CAUSE OF CRASH ............................................................................................................................................................. 10 FIGURE 4-1 STUDY CRASH NETWORK .............................................................................................................................................. 17
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 3-1 CRASHES BY YEAR AND SEVERITY .................................................................................................................................... 7 TABLE 3-2 COLLISION TYPE ................................................................................................................................................................... 8 TABLE 3-3 CAUSE OF CRASH ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 TABLE 3-4 TOTAL CRASHES INVOLVED WITH ................................................................................................................................. 10 TABLE 3-5 FATAL AND SEVERE INJURY CRASHES INVOLVED ....................................................................................................... 11 TABLE 3-6 CRASH BY LIGHTING CONDITION .................................................................................................................................. 11 TABLE 3-7 PEDESTRIAN CRASH BY VIOLATION .............................................................................................................................. 12 TABLE3-8AGEOFAT-FAULTPARTY ................................................................................................................................................. 12 TABLE 3-9 OTS RANKINGS ................................................................................................................................................................... 13 TABLE 3-10 INTERSECTION HIGH COLLISION LOCATIONS .......................................................................................................... 13 TABLE 3-11 INTERSECTION HIGH COLLISION LOCATIONS BY COLLISION TYPE ...................................................................... 14 TABLE 3-12 SEGMENT COLLISION RATES ......................................................................................................................................... 15 TABLE 5-1 APPLICABLE SAFETY COUNTERMEASURES .................................................................................................................. .35 TABLE 7-2 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY FUNDING SOURCES SUMMARY ................................................................................. ..46
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A- INTERSECTION COLLISIONS
APPENDIX B - MID-BLOCK COLLISIONS
APPENDIX C- CALTRANS COUNTERMEASURE LIST
APPENDIX D - COST ESTIMATES
November 15, 2022, Item #4
REPORTS DISCOVERY AND ADMISSION INTO EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN REPORTS, SURVEYS, AND INFORMATION - Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to Section 748 of Title 23, United States Code [23 U.S. C. § 148(h) (4)), shall not be subject for discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposed in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or address in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data Consideration of implementing the countermeasures identified in this report is contingent upon but is not limited to securing the necessary right-of-way for the traffic safety enhancement and securing funding and resources to finance all project phases, including design, construction, on-going maintenance, environmental analysis, and community engagement
November 15, 2022, Item #4
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
INTRODUCTION
KOA Corporation (KOA) was retained by the City of Poway to develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP).
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) established the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) to provide funding for local agencies to identify safety needs and recommend projects to address these needs. The LRSP provides an opportunity to evaluate roadway safety problems through data analysis and improve roadway safety through investments in infrastructure, education , and enforcement. The process of preparing a LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and analyze safety problems and recommend safety improvements.
1.2 PURPOSE OF THE LRSP
The LRSP systematically ident ifies and analyzes safety problems and recommends safety improvements .
Preparing the LRSP facilitates collaboration through the development of partnerships between Poway and stakeholders . The results of the LRSP are summarized with a prioritized list of improvements and actions.
The LRSP offers a proactive approach to addressing roadway safety needs in Poway. The LRSP not only focuses on engineering improvements to mitigate crashes. It also addresses safety improvements in other areas such as enforcement, education, and emergency services.
1.3 PUBLIC INPUT
Stakeholders prov ided input on the project mission and goals and provided input on key safety issues and concerns. Stakeholders included :
• County Sheriff
• Poway Unified School District
• City of Poway Public Works Department
• Poway Fire Department
• Palomar Hospital
1.3.1 Project Goals
The mission of this LRSP is to achieve a reduction in collisions, and in particular , in fatal and serious injury collisions through a multi -agency approach that utilizes education, enforcement, engineering and emergency service strategies.
The City and stakeholders identified these project goals:
• Saving lives and preventing serious injuries on local roads and streets • Reducing the severity of collisions through reduction in travel speed • Providing the needed infrastructure to address higher collision locations • Addressing travel speeds
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
9 of73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTRODUCTION
• Addressing distracted driving or driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol • Improving safety in school zones
• Improving driver awareness of speeding, texting, and drinking while driving
1.3.2 Safety Issues and Concerns
Stakeholders provided input on the following safety issues and concerns related to travel safety in Poway:
Traffic safety issues facing the City of Poway of which we should be aware:
• Speeding vehicles, particularly on the arterials
• Distracted driving
• Driving under the influence
• Running red lights at intersections
• Traffic flow safety during road construction
Bicycle or pedestrian issues to address:
• Narrow roadways with limited visibility on Espola Road and the Poway Road grade • At locations near schools
Specific locations to address where there are safety concerns:
• Safety around schools, especially at start and end times • Twin Peaks Road, Espola Road, and Scripps Poway Parkway Consider policies and other actions:
• Educational programs for students, particularly DUI, speeding, and texting while driving • Programs for adults, including annual refresher driver training • Traffic safety billboards
• Use of speed feedback signs
1.4 COLLISION SUMMARY
The collision analysis was conducted for all reported crashes that have occurred on local Poway roadways within the City limits for a five year time period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019.
Collision data for the year 2020 was reviewed but not included in the statistical analysis, as changes in travel resulting from COVID-19 did not reflect typical travel conditions. Based on the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database, between January 2015 and December 2019 there were 921 crashes in the City along local roadways. Figure 1.1 illustrates a map of the collisions citywide.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 2
November 15, 2022, Item #4
Figure 1-1: Poway Citywide Collision Map (2015-2019)
Escondido
San Diego
N
Data: SWITRS . 2015-2019
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
INTRODUCTION
Legend
Collision Count
• Under 5
5 - 10
10 - 20
0 30-35
• Over35
L-=-1 Poway Boundary
November 15, 2022, Item #4
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 COLLISION DATA SOURCES
METHODOLOGY
The collision data was drawn from three sources. The collision trend data was derived between 2015 and 2019 from the California Highway Patrol's Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database.
The University of California Berkeley's Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) provided comparative information on crash history in Poway and San Diego County. The California Office of Traffic Safety Rankings (OTS) contributed collision data for the year 2018 for Poway and 106 cities in California with a similar population .
2.1.1 SWITRS
The California Highway Patrol's SWITRS database contains data on statewide collisions. The SWITRS application provides geographically- and temporally-targeted collision reports in an electronic format. KOA used SWITRS to evaluate data on Poway collisions between 2015 and 2019, both in aggregate and classified by control type (signalized, non-signalized, and midblock locations).
2.1.2TIMS
The TIMS database contains geocoded collisions included in the SWITRS database. TIMS geocodes SWITRS collisions that involve either an injury or fatality (i.e., excluding property damage-only collisions). Thus, TIMS provides local agencies with an efficient and straightforward tool to conduct geographic analysis. KOA utilized TIMS data from 2015 to 2019 to compare Poway with San Diego County at-large to identify prominent transportation safety issues in the City. Dfhgdf
2.1.3 OTS
The OTS rankings compare traffic safety statistics among cities in the state of California with similar populations. The statistics focus on the victims killed and injured in crashes. Cities can use these comparisons to see the areas in which they underperform. The OTS collision ranking system compares cities of similar population sizes. Poway belongs to the OTS Group D, which contains 97 California cities with a population between 25,001 and 50,000.
2.2 IDENTIFYING LOCATIONS FOR ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES Crash data analysis for this LRSP was conducted using collision data from the SWITRS collision database.
The collision records include a variety of information about each collision, including the location, date, time of the day, crash type, crash severity, primary violation category, transportation mode of the involved parties, and movement of the involved parties prior to the collision . Per California state law, motor vehicle collisions must be reported when vehicle or property damage exceeds $1,000, or when any of the parties suffer an injury or fatality. Collisions with no injured parties or little property damage might not be reported and, therefore, are not included in the collision database.
Caltrans' Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California's Local Road Owners, Version 1.5, April 2020 (LRSM) encourages a pro-active rather than reactive approach to safety issue identification. Traditionally, agencies using a reactive approach have located and implemented safety projects solely based on recent crashes, specific crash concentrations, or safety issues raised by stakeholders. A pro-active approach is preferred, CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 4
November 15, 2022, Item #4
METHODOLOGY
according to the LRS Manual, because with traditional methods, "crash concentrations and crash trends may be missed if local agencies rely exclusively on these identifiers for their roadway safety effort." A pro-active approach would identify safety improvements by analyzing the safety of the entire roadway network. For this document, the process for identifying candidate locations for safety improvements considers any one of the following three factors:
• An extensive crash history at high-collision frequency locations providing insight into which roadway characteristics are associated with certain types of crashes • Professional engineering judgment regarding the availability of feasible engineering countermeasures to fix the safety issues
• Applicability of the engineering countermeasures at other locations with roadway characteristics associated with similar types of crashes regardless of their crash history The LRSM guidelines require analyzing at least three to five years of the most recent crash data. Five years worth of collision data from January 2015 to December 2019 was reviewed for the Poway LRSP. Five years of crash data usage adheres to the maximum threshold permitted by the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSI P) for a safety infrastructure project application for federal funding.
2.2.1 Ranking Function
A candidate intersection or roadway segment for safety improvements does not necessarily need to demonstrate a history of high or severe collisions to be considered for further evaluation. However, locations with high numbers of collisions are often good starting points for safety analysis due to the rich information provided by the collision history. Three ranking methods were utilized to identify high collision frequency intersections and roadway segments: Average Crash Frequency, Crash Rate, and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) scores. A brief description of each of the methods is provided in the following sections.
2.2.2 Average Crash Frequency
Average Crash Frequency is the most basic method for assessing collision incidence. The analysis tallies the numbers of collisions at each location in the roadway network, both in aggregate and by a category of interest (e.g. level of severity, collision type, and others). The analysis then ranks intersections or roadway segments based on the collisions' frequency.
2.2.3 Crash Rate
The Crash Rate method goes a step beyond average crash frequency, normalizing facilities' crash frequency by the volume of vehicle traffic or travel. This method divides the number of collisions (or collisions in a particular category) by the quantity of Million Entering Vehicles (for intersections) or 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled (for roadway segments). While the Crash Rate method accounts for differences in facilities' length and traffic volume, it may instead unduly favor low-volume and low-collision roadways where countermeasures produce the lowest net benefit for travelers.
2.2.4 EPDO Scores
Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) scores assign weighting factors to crashes by severity relative to property damage only (PDO) collisions. The weight generally reflects an order of magnitude difference between the cost of fatal/severe injury crashes and non-severe injury collisions. The weights by crash severity come from the 2020 Local Roadway Safety Manual:
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 5
November 15, 2022, Item #4
METHODOLOGY
• Fatal and Severe Injury at signalized intersections - $1,590,000 • Fatal and Severe Injury at non-signalized intersections - $2,530,000 • Fatal and Severe Injury at Roadway- $2,190,000
• Other Visible lnjury-$142,300
• Compliant of Pain - $80,900
• PDQ - $13,300
2.3 PROPOSING ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES
After ranking the intersections and roadway segments, the following steps were used to propose engineering countermeasures:
• Reviewed crash details (party involved, movement before the crash, primary collision factor, violation code, time of the day, and others) at high-risk locations • Obtained detailed Sheriff reports from the City and reviewed for all the fatal and severe injury collisions
• Reviewed field conditions through physical site visits. • Assessed the nature of prevalent crash types with respect to the intersection's control type, geometrical features, and signal phasing/timing
• Reviewed current conditions and recent historical conditions via Google Map Street View, whenever necessary, to check whether any geometry, signal, or signage changes have been made in the past few years
• Evaluated and screened countermeasures from the LRSM or Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse (http ://www .cmfclearinghouse .org/). a searchable database that can be easily queried to identify CMFs and Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs)
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
14 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COLLISION ANALYSIS
3.0 COLLISION ANALYSIS
3.1 CITYWI DE COLLISION DATA
Five years of collision data was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019. The University of California Berkeley's Transportation Injury Mapping System {TIMS) provided comparative information on collisions in Poway and San Diego County. During this period a total of 921 crashes were reported in the City along local roadways.
3.1 .1 Crashes by Year
For the five-year analysis period, the number of fatal crashes, injury crashes, property damage only crashes, total fatalities, and total injuries are highlighted in Table 3-1, including the averages over the analysis period. Crash severity is illustrated in Figure 3-1.
Table 3-1 Crashes by Year and Severity
Category Year Total Average Percent
2015 2016
Fatal Collisions 0 1
Severe Injury Collisions 11 5
Visible Injury Collisions 26 26
Complaint of Pain Collisions 45 58
Property Damage Only Collisions 107 101
Total Collisions 189 191
Total Fatalities 0 1
Total Injuries 82 89
Figure 3-1 Collision Severity
I Fatal Collisions 1
I 1%
' Property l
Dac:~~~o~~ly 1·
53%
■ Fatal Collisions
■ Visible Injury Collisions
■ Property Damage Only Collisions
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
2017
1 8
37 47
136
229
1 92
2018 2019
2 1
8 5
28 35
55 33
86 59
179 133
2 1
91 73
1-se~ ere lnj~ry I
1 Collisions II
4%
-. Visible Injury ,
1 Collisions I
I 16% .
1 Co~plai~t of j
I
Pain Collisions
26% I
11 Severe Injury Collisions
■ Complaint of Pain Collisions
5 1 1%
37 7 4%
152 30 17%
238 48 26%
489 98 53%
921 184 -
5 1 -
427 85 -
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COLLISION ANALYSIS
3.1.2 Crash Type
Table 3-2 and Figure 3-2 describe the total collisions by collision type for each year and for the five-year period. The rear-end crash pattern was the most common collision type for all the collisions (30%). Rear end crashes often occur where traffic speeds change, such as near signalized intersections where a driver does not react in time a change of traffic signal or where vehicles turn into driveways. Broadside crashes accounted for 25% of the collisions . Broadside crashes often occur at intersections or driveways because of drivers failing to yield or obey stop -controls, or where a gap in traffic is misjudged where a turning vehicle collides with a vehicle traveling through the intersection. Hit-object crashes include vehicle collisions with parked cars, poles or other objects within or outside the roadway, and accounted for 19% of the total collisions.
Table 3-2 Collision Type
Crash Type
Rear-End
Broadside
Hit Object
Sideswipe
Head-On
Vehicle/Pedestrian
Overturned
Other
Total
Figure 3-3 Collision Type
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
2015 2016
56 71
40 44
39 30
28 25
7 10
7 1
5 1
7 9
189 191
0 4%
4%~
• Rear-End
• Hit Object
■ Head-On
• Overturned
Vear
2017 2018
76 45
54 55
45 34
29 23
12 7
6 5
3 3
4 7
229 179
■ Broadside
■ Sideswipe
■ Vehicle/Pedestrian
• Other
Total Percent
2019
32 280 30%
36 229 25%
25 173 19%
19 124 13%
6 42 5%
5 24 3%
4 16 2%
6 33 4%
133 921 -
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COLLISION ANALYSIS
3.1.3 Crash Causes
The causes of collisions are listed in Table 3-3 and shown in Figure 3-4. The most frequent cause of collisions has been unsafe speed (23%), followed by Auto Right of Way Violations (14%), Driving under the Influence (13%) and improper turning (12%). Unsafe speed crashes often occur at intersections and are a result vehicle speeding caused by higher speeds on downhill grades, not slowing resulting from changing conditions or by disobeying posted speed limits . Auto Right of Way violations occur when vehicles fail to yield the right-of-way when required . Traffic signals and sign violations are a result of motorists failing to see or observe these traffic control devices.
Table 3-3 Cause of Crash
Crash Cause
Unsafe Speed
Auto Right of Way Violation
Drivinq/Bikinq Under Influence
Improper Turning
Traffic Siqnal and Siqns
Unsafe Lane Chanqe
Pedestrian Violation
Other Than Driver or Pedestrian
Unsafe Starting or Backing
Pedestrian Riqht of Way Violation
Following Too Closely
Wronq Side of Road
Other Hazardous Violation
Other Improper Drivinq
Impeding Traffic
Hazardous Parkinq
Improper Passing
Not stated/Unknown
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
17 of 73
2015 2016
47 so
23 28
31 21
28 17
12 12
9 9
2 0
6 5
4 6
2 0
3 7
5 6
3 4
3 2
0 1
0 1
5 2
6 20
Vear Total Percent
2017 2018 2019
58 34 27 216 23%
35 27 18 131 14%
28 19 20 119 13%
26 18 21 110 12%
15 21 18 78 8%
20 14 9 61 7%
2 1 1 6 1%
5 5 3 24 3%
2 11 3 26 3%
2 4 3 11 1%
5 0 0 15 2%
11 4 2 28 3%
5 1 2 15 2%
0 1 1 7 1%
0 1 0 2 0%
0 0 0 1 0%
3 5 2 17 2%
12 13 3 54 6%
November 15, 2022, Item #4
Figure 3-4 Cause of Crash
Unsafe Speed
Auto Right of Way Violation
Driving/Biking Under Influence
Improper Turning
Traffic Signal and Signs
0%
Unsafe Lane Change
Pedestrian Violation •
Other Than Driver or Pedestrian -
Unsafe Starting or Backing -
Ped Right of Way Violation •
Following Too Closely -
Wrong Side of Road -
Other Hazardous Violation -
Other Improper Driving •
Impeding Traffic
Hazardous Parking
Improper Passing -
Not stated/Unknown
3.1.4 Crash Involved With
COLLISION ANALYSIS
5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Table 3-4 summarizes what type of object involved with each crash. The majority of crashes involved a collision with another motor vehicle (64%). Three percent of crashes involved collisions with pedestrians and three percent of crashes involved collisions with bicycles.
Table 3-4 Total Crashes Involved With
All Crashes Involved Vear Total Percent
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Other Motor Vehicle 105 134 144 122 81 586 64%
Fixed Object 42 28 47 29 24 170 18%
Parked Motor Vehicle 22 11 18 8 13 72 8%
Bicycle 6 8 10 3 4 31 3%
Pedestrian 7 1 6 5 5 24 3%
Other Object 5 4 4 4 2 19 2%
Non-Collision 1 2 0 5 4 12 1%
Motor Vehicle on Other Roadway 0 2 0 2 0 4 0%
Not Stated 1 0 0 1 0 2 0%
Animal 0 1 0 0 0 1 0%
Total 189 191 229 179 133 921 -
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 10
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COLLISION ANALYSIS
Table 3-5 shows the type of object involved with the collision for fatal and severe crashes. The majority of the severe injury crashes involved either another motor vehicle (62%), fixed objects (14%) or pedestrians (11 %).
Table 3-5 Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes Involved
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes Involved Vear Total Percent 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Other Motor Vehicle 5 2 5 7 4 23 62%
Fixed Object 1 1 1 1 1 5 14%
Pedestrian 3 0 0 1 0 4 11%
Non-Collision 0 1 0 1 1 3 8%
Parked Motor Vehicle 1 0 2 0 0 3 8%
Bicycle 0 1 1 0 0 2 5%
Other Object 1 1 0 0 0 2 5%
Total 11 6 9 10 6 42 -
3.1.5 Lighting Conditions
Approximately 1/3 of the collisions occurred at night. Only three percent of collisions occurred on unlit streets.
Table 3-6 Crash by Lighting Condition
Lighting Condition Vear Total Percent
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Daylight 123 132 162 116 82 615 67%
Dark - Street Liqhts 54 47 56 54 40 251 27%
Dusk - Dawn 5 6 6 5 6 28 3%
Dark - No Street Lights 7 6 5 4 5 27 3%
Total 189 191 229 179 133 921 -
3.1 .6 Pedestrian Crashes
Table 3-7 shows pedestrian actions for crashes involving pedestrians. Reported pedestrian actions generally involved either a crash crossing a roadway while not in a crosswalk (26%), or a crash while crossing within a crosswalk (26%).
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 11
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COLLISION ANALYSIS
Table 3-7 Pedestrian Crash by Violation
Violation Type Number Percent
Not Crossinq in Crosswalk 10 26.3
Hit While in Crosswalk at Intersection 10 26.3
Hit while on sidewalk or driveway 4 10.6
Hit While Walking in Road 2 5.3
Pedestrian Crossinq Midblock 2 5.3
Pedestrian Crossing without Walk Signal 1 5.3
Other Driver Action 9 20.9
Total 38 100
3.1.7 Age Distribution of At -Fault Parties
Information was collected about the parties causing the collision (At-Fault Party) and the people that were involved in the accident (not at fault) . Younger drivers (under 25 years) accounted for 28.1 % of collisions.
Older drivers (65+) accounted for 17.0% of collisions.
Table 3-8 Age of At-Fault Party
Aqe Ranqe Count Percent
<18 64 7.0%
18-25 193 21 .1%
26-35 120 13.1%
36-45 108 11.8%
46-55 165 18.1%
56-65 108 11 .8%
66-75 62 6.8%
>75 93 10.2%
Total 913 100.0%
3.2 COMPARISON WITH CITIES OF SIMILAR SIZE
Poway falls under Group D in the State of California's Office of Transportation Safety (OTS) Crash Ranking system. Group D consists of 97 cities in the state of California with a population between 25,000 and 50,000.
Table 3-9 shows the City's crash ranking among these cities, where 1 being the highest or worst and 97 being the lowest or best. This data is for the most recent year that data was available, which is 2018. Overall, the City's traffic safety performance is good. The City ranked near the best at 92th for total fatal and injury collisions.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 12
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COLLISION ANALYSIS
Table 3-9 OTS Rankings
Victims OTS Type Of Crash Killed & Ranking Injured
Total Fatal and Injury 140 92/97
Alcohol Involved 16 73/97
Had Been Drinking Driver < 21 0 97/97
Had Been Drinkinq Driver 21 - 34 5 71/97
Motorcycles 10 69/97
Pedestrians 10 84/97
Pedestrians < 15 1 56/97
Pedestrians 65+ 1 82/97
Bicyclists 3 93/97
Bicyclists < 15 2 29/97
Composite 54 93/97
3.3 FOCUSED CRASH NETWORK
The focused crash network is defined to include both intersections and roadway segments.
3.3.1 Intersections
Crash locations have been identified by reviewing the number of crashes at each intersection throughout the City and assigning a cost associated with the severity of each crash consistent with the LRSP Manual Appendix D (Benefit/Cost Ratio Calculations) . Collisions that occurred within 250 feet of an intersection are considered intersection collisions. Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) crash costs are calculated by assigning weighting factors to crashes by severity relative to property damage only (PDO) crashes. The highest intersection collision locations are listed by the crash cost in Table 3-10. The table shows the 10 intersections with the highest crash costs. A full list of intersections is provided in Appendix A.
Table 3-10 Intersection High Collision Locations
Property
Severe Visible Complaint Damage Only Total
No. Intersection Fatal Injury Injury of Pain (PDO) Collision Crash Costs EDPO Rank 1 SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY & COMMUNITY RD 2 1 3 10 16 3,698,000 1 2 POMERADO RD & TWIN PEAKS RD/CAMINO DEL NORTE 1 2 15 11 29 3,234,400 2 3 POWAY RD & POMERADO RD 1 7 4 14 26 3,095,900 3
4 TWIN PEAKS RD & COMMUNITY RD/HILLNDALE WY 1 4 3 9 17 2,521,600 4 5 TED WILLIAMS PKWY & POMERADO RD 1 3 3 8 15 2,366,000 5 6 POWAY RD & MIDLAND RD 1 1 4 9 15 2,175,600 6
7 TWIN PEAKS RD & MIDLAND RD 1 2 3 3 9 2,157,200 7
8 POWAY RD & ESPOLA RD 1 2 2 6 11 2,116,200 8
9 POWAY RD & COMMUNITY RD 2 7 14 23 1,037,100 9
10 SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY & POMERADO RD 3 6 6 15 992,100 10 11 TWIN PEAKS RD & SILVERSET ST 2 5 6 13 768,900 11
12 POMERADO RD & OAK KNOLL RD 3 1 5 9 574,300 12
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 13
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COLLISION ANALYSIS
Table 3-11 Intersection High Collision Locations by Collision Type No. Intersection Broadside Head-On Hit Object Overturned Rear End Sideswipe Vehicle/Pedestrian 1 SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY & COMMUNITY RD 3 1 10 2
2 POMERADO RD & TWIN PEAKS RD/CAMINO DEL NORTE 10 4 5 6 3 3 POWAY RD & POMERADO RD 6 1 1 13 5
4 TWIN PEAKS RD & COMMUNITY RD/HILLNDALE WY 9 3 1 7 2
5 TED WILLIAMS PKWY & POMERADO RD 8 6
6 POWAY RD & MIDLAND RD 4 2 4 4
7 TWIN PEAKS RD & MIDLAND RD 1 1 3 2
8 POWAY RD & ESPOLA RD 1 1 1 4 4
9 POWAY RD & COMMUNITY RD 7 1 12 3
10 SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY & POMERADO RD 7 1 5 2
11 TWIN PEAKS RD & SILVERSET ST 2 2 2 6 1
12 POMERADO RD & OAK KNOLL RD 7 2
3.3.2 Crash Corridors
The calculation of crash rates is used to determine the relative safety of a roadway segment by considering the exposure to traffic volumes and length of the segment. The collision frequency and collision rate were calculated for primary corridors in Poway. The determination of crash rates for roadway segments is based on the following segment characteristics:
• Roadway segment length (feet)
• Roadway segment average daily traffic (ADT)
• Total number of crashes for segments
The crash rates calculated for each corridor were compared to data obtained from the Caltrans 2018 Crash Data on California State Highways for District 11 roadways in urban areas that are categorized into roadway types. The average crash rates used to compare road types in this analysis are as follows :
2 and 3 lane roadways = 1.14
4+ lane undivided roadways = 1.03
4+ lane divided roadways = 1.03
The collision rates for each segment are shown in Table 3-12 . The one segment that exceed that statewide average collision rate is Poway Road from Oak Knoll to Garden Road. A full list of mid-block collisions is provided in Appendix B.
1 1
2 CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 14
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COLLISION ANALYSIS
Table 3-12 Segment Collision Rates
Total Severe Visible Complaint Collison Exceed
No. Primary Rd • Segments Type Collisions Fatal Injury Injury of Pain PDO ADT Length VMT Rate Standard
POWAY RD - OAK KNOLL
1 TO GARDEN RD 4D 163 6 26 45 86 31,787 2.75 159,531,006 1.02 Yes 2 MIDLAND RD 2/3UD 19 1 4 5 9 6 ,049 1.72 18,987,811 1.00 No
COMMUNITY RD - TWIN
3 PEAKS TO HILLEARY 4UD 32 1 4 15 12 18,747 1.01 34,555,408 0.93 No
COMMUNITY RD -
HILLEARY TO SCRIPPS
4 RANCH 4D so 1 2 10 10 27 24,035 1.51 66,234,451 0.75 No 5 TWIN PEAKS RD 4UD 98 1 3 17 28 49 31,798 3.2 185,697,400 0.53 No 6 SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 4D 77 2 3 11 25 36 20,206 4.25 156, 722, 788 0.49 No 7 ESPOLA RD 4UD 67 4 6 17 40 15,456 5.14 144,985,008 0.46 No
POMERADO RD- POWAY
8 TO SOUTH LIMIT 4D 40 1 1 12 8 18 33,216 1.57 95,172,144 0.42 No
POMERADO RD - NORTH
9 LIMITTO POWAY 4UD 70 1 13 33 23 22,544 4.09 168,274,052 0.42 No 10 TED WILLIAMS PKWY 6D 15 1 2 1 11 31,083 0.67 38,006,738 0.39 No
POWAY RD - WEST LIMIT
11 TO OAK KNOLL 4D 14 2 5 7 38,182 0.57 39,718,826 0.35 No
POWAY RD - GARDEN RD
12 TO EAST LIMIT 2/3UD 32 3 7 7 15 16 ,392 3.62 108,293,748 0.30 No CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 15
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
4.0 INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
4.1 BACKGROUND
In general, the safety infrastructure in Poway is good. While the arterial network is well designed to accommodate vehicle movements, changes in travel speeds occur at signalized intersections, where vehicles may need to come to a full stop . At these locations, rear end coll isions and broadside collisions occur with the primary noted cause being unsafe travel speed. In the following section, countermeasures are identified to address these conditions as well as other observed conditions for locations that were identified in Section 3 and include the 10 intersections with the highest crash costs and one street segment that was above the statewide collision rate average. The intersection and segment locations provide examples to apply the system safety approach. The locations are shown in Figure 4-1.
4.2 CRASH INTERSECTION LOCATIONS
The intersections and segment used for the systemic evaluation include:
Intersections
1. Scripps Poway Parkway & Community Road
2. Pomerado Road & Twin Peaks Road / Camino del Norte
3. Poway Road & Pomerado Road
4. Twin Peaks Road & Community Road/ Hillndale Way
5. Ted Williams Parkway & Pomerado Road
6. Poway Road & Midland Road
7. Twin Peaks Road & Midland Road
8. Poway Road & Espola Road
9. Poway Road & Community Road
10. Scripps Poway Parkway & Pomerado Road
Segment
1. Poway Road - Oak Knoll Road to Garden Road
In the following sections, information for each location includes a discussion of collision severity, collision type and collision cause provided from the SWITRS database. Information describing contributing factors is based upon a field review of each intersection.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 16
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Figure 4-1 Study Crash Network
I
•
Intersections
-- Segments
- - Roads
)
1_ _ I Poway Boundary
.o·:, -_-:_-:_:_:,:,:_:_:,:,:,:;::::;:
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 17
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
4.2.1 Intersections
1. Scripps Poway Parkway & Community Road
This intersection has the following characteristics:
The eastbound and westbound approaches on Scripps Poway Parkway each have three through lanes and two left turn lanes. Community Road on the northbound approach has two through lanes and a single left turn pocket while the southbound approach has a single through lane and both a left turn and right turn pocket. Buffered bike lanes exist on both legs of Scripps Poway Parkway while Community Road has bike lanes only on the northern leg. Scripps Poway Parkway has a speed limit of 55 mph, and Community Road has speed limits of 45 mph on the northern leg and 35 mph on the southern leg. ADA ramps, standard pedestrian push buttons, and continental crosswalks exist on all corners of the intersection. Commercial zoning exists on all corners of the intersection with offices on the northeast and southeast corners. A nursery exists on the northwest corner and a big box shopping center exists on the southwest corner.
Scripps Poway Parkway & Community Road
Collision Summary
The intersection of Scripps Poway Parkway and Community Road had 16 total collisions, and an intersection rank of pt by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $3.7 million.
Severity- severe injury (2), visible injury (1 ), complaint of pain (3), and property damage only (10).
Type - The most common types of crashes are rear-end (10), broadside (3), and sideswipe (2).
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
26 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are unsafe speed (5), unsafe lane change (2), and automobile right of way (2).
Other - The two severe injury collisions was a broadside and rear-end caused by improper turning and unsafe lane change respectively.
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• Traffic congestion associated with higher traffic levels during peak drive times • Vehicles that may be traveling above the speed limit approaching the intersection (two approaches have significant downgrades that increase breaking distances) • Drives not adjusting to approach grades that may limit visibility of the intersection
2. Pomerado Road & Twin Peaks Road / Camino del Norte
This intersection has the following characteristics:
This intersection of two arterial streets is located in west-central Poway close to the border with the City of San Diego's Carmel Mountain Ranch. Twin Peaks Road at the intersection with Pomerado Road converts into Camino del Norte going westbound . Pomerado Road has two through lanes in each direction with two left turn lanes on the northbound approach, and two left turn lanes and a right turn lane with pedestrian refuge on the southbound approach . Twin Peaks Road has two through lanes with a left turn lane and a right turn pocket on the westbound approach. Camino del Norte has three through lanes with two left turn lanes on the eastbound approach. Buffered bike lanes exist on Pomerado Road and standard bike lanes exist on Twin Peaks Road/Camino del Norte . Pomerado Road has speed limit of 45 mph on the north leg and 40 mph on the south leg. Twin Peaks Road has speed limit of 45 mph and Camino del Norte has a speed limit of 50 mph. ADA ramps, APS pedestrian push buttons and continental crosswalks exist at the intersection . The City has recently upgraded this intersection to a continental crosswalk. The primary zoning near the intersection is residential - suburban with housing on the northeast and northwest corners of the intersection, and a pre-school and housing on the southwest corner of the intersection . Commercial zoning with a shopping center exists on the southeast corner of the intersection.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 19
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Pomerado Road & Twin Peaks Road/ Camino de! Norte
Collision Summary
The intersection of Pomerado Road with Twin Peaks Road and Camino del Norte had 29 total collisions, and an intersection rank of 2nd by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $3.2 million .
Severity- severe injury (1 ), visible injury (2), complaint of pain (15), and property damage only (11 ).
Type - The most common types of crashes are broadside (10), rear-end (6), hit object (5), head-on (4), and sideswipe (3).
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are traffic signals and signs (7), unsafe speed (5), automobile right of way (5), unsafe lane change (3), improper turning (3), driving or bicycling under the influence of alcohol or drug (2), and other hazardous violation (2).
Other - The severe injury collision was a hit object caused by unsafe speed.
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• During peak periods, higher traffic volumes result in lower speeds. During non-peak conditions, higher speeds could contribute to collisions.
• Visibility of traffic signals
• Downgrades on some approaches increases breaking distance • Signal heads not visible on westbound approach due to median and parkway trees.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 20
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
3. Poway Road & Pomerado Road
This intersection has the following characteristics:
Poway Road has two through lanes in each direction and two left turn lanes on the eastbound approach and a single left turn pocket on the westbound approach . Pomerado Road has two through lanes in each direction and two left turn lanes on the northbound approach, and two left turn lanes and a single right turn pocket on the southbound approach . Bike lanes exist on all legs of the intersection. Poway Rd has a speed limit of 35 mph and Pomerado Road has a speed limit of 45 mph. ADA ramps, standard pedestrian push buttons, and continenta l crosswalks exist on all corners of the intersection. The primary zoning in the area is commercial. Three gas stations are located on the northwest, northeast, and southwest corners of the intersection. A commercial building with multiple retail shops is located on the southeast corner.
Driveways to these properties are located within the functional area of the intersection (approximately 250 feet). The City has been awarded funds from HSIP Cycle 10 to provide advanced dilemma zone protection at this intersection.
Poway Road & Pomerado Road
Collision Summary
The intersection of Poway Road and Pomerado Road had 26 total collisions, and an intersection rank of 3rd by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $3.1 million.
Severity- severe injury (1 ), visible injury (7), complaint of pain (4), and property damage only (14).
Type - The most common types of crashes are rear-end (13), broadside (6), and sideswipe (5).
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 21
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are unsafe speed (6), driving under the influence of alcohol or drug (6), automobile right of way (5), improper turning (2), and unsafe lane change (2).
Other - The severe injury collision was a broadside caused by an automobile right of way incident.
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• Driveways in functional area of intersection resulting in rear end collisions. • High travel speeds entering intersection approaches.
4. Twin Peaks Road & Community Road/ Hillndale Way
This intersection has the following characteristics:
This intersection of an arterial, collector, and local street is located in a residential zone in central Poway.
Twin Peaks Road has two through lanes in each direction with a single left turn lane on the westbound approach and a single left turn lane, and a right turn pocket on the eastbound approach . Community Road which begins south of Twin Peaks Road has two through lanes going southbound and a single through lane with two left turn lanes and a single right turn pocket on the northbound approach.
Hillndale Way north of Twin Peaks Road has a single through lane in each direction and a left turn lane and a right turn pocket on the southbound approach. Bike lanes exist on both directions of Twin Peaks Road and Community Road south of Twin Peaks
Road. Hillndale Way is a residential local street
that allows for bicycle shared-use. Twin Peaks
Road and Community Road both have a speed
limit of 45 mph. Hillndale Way north of Twin Peaks
Road has a speed limit of 25 mph. ADA ramps,
standard pedestrian push buttons , and continental
crosswalks exist on three corners of the
intersection . The primary zoning in the area is
residential suburban with low -density housing
existing on all corners of the intersection except
the southwest corner where empty land a park
and ride lot sits.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
Intersection recently upgraded to continental crosswalk
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Twin Peaks Road & Community Road/ Hillndale Way
Collision Summary
The intersection ofTwin Peaks Road with Community Road and Hillndale Way had 17 total collisions, and an intersection rank of 4th by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $2.5 million.
Severity- severe injury (1), visible injury (4), complaint of pain (3), and property damage only (9).
Type - The most common types of crashes are broadside (9), rear-end (7), hit object (3), and sideswipe (2).
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are unsafe speed (6), and traffic signal and signs (5). Three collisions have unknown factors .
Other - The severe collision was a hit object caused by an unsafe lane change.
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• Roadway curves limit visibility of intersection
• Higher travel speeds entering signalized intersection. Several approaches are on a downgrade and contribute to longer breaking distances.
• Driver awareness of signal
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 23
November 15, 2022, Item #4
5. Ted Williams Parkway & Pomerado Road
This intersection has the following characteristics:
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
This intersection of two arterial streets is located in west-central Poway close to the border with the City of San Diego's Carmel Mountain Ranch. Ted Williams Parkway eastbound approach has two through lanes with two left turn lanes and a single right turn pocket. The westbound approach has three through lanes and a single left turn lane. Pomerado Road has two through lanes in each direction with two left turn lanes on the northbound approach, and a single left turn lane and right turn pocket on the southbound approach. Buffered bike lanes exist on both legs of Pomerado Road and the eastern leg of Ted Williams Parkway. Standard bike lanes exist on the western half of Ted Williams Parkway. Ted Williams Parkway has a speed limit of 50 mph on the western leg and 45 mph on the eastern leg. Pomerado Road has a speed limit of 40 mph in both directions. ADA ramps, APS pedestrian push buttons, and continental crosswalks exist on all corners of the intersection . The zoning in the area is a mix of residential and commercial with civic and open space land uses. Residential homes exist on the northwest corner and a shopping center sits on the northeast corner of the intersection . The Arbolitos Sports Field is on the southeast corner and the southwest corner is the Pomerado trailhead .
Ted Williams Parkway & Pomerado Road
Collision Summary
The intersection of Ted Williams Parkway and Pomerado Road had 15 total collisions, and an intersection rank of 5th by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $2.4 million.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 24
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Severity - severe injury (1 ), visible injury (3), complaint of pain (3), and property damage only (8).
Type - The most common types of crashes are broadside (8), rear-end (6), and vehicle/pedestrian (1).
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are traffic signals and signs (5), unsafe speed (4), automobile right of way (2), and driving or bicycling under the influence of alcohol or drug (2).
Other - The severe collision was a vehicle and pedestrian collision caused by a pedestrian violation .
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• Roadway curve on Ted Williams Parkway may impact signal visibility • Unsafe travel speeds approaching intersection . Because of downgrades on several approaches, breaking distances are longer.
6. Poway Road & Midland Road
This intersection has the following characteristics:
This intersection of an arterial and collector street is located in Poway's central commercial district. Poway Road has two through lanes in each direction with a single left turn lane and a single right turn pocket on the westbound approach and two left turn lanes on the eastbound approach. Midland Road has a single through lane in each direction with a single left turn lane and a right turn pocket on the northbound approach and a single left turn lane with a right turn pocket on the southbound approach. Bike lanes exist on the north, west, and east legs of the intersection . No bike facilities exist on the southern leg of Midland Road. Poway Road and Midland Road have speed limits of 35 mph in both directions . ADA ramps, standard pedestrian push buttons, with a continental crosswalk on the north leg and basic crosswalks exist on the other three legs of the intersection . The primary zoning in the area is commercial with shopping centers located on the northeast, northwest, and southwest corners of the intersection . An auto dealership is located on the southeast corner of the intersection . The City has been awarded funds from HSIP Cycle 10 to provide advanced dilemma zone protection at this intersection.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 25
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Poway Road & Midland Road
Collision Summary
The intersection of Poway Road and Midland Road had 15 total collisions, and an intersect ion rank of 6th by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $2.2 million.
Severity- severe injury (1), visible injury (1), complaint of pain (4), and property damage only (9).
Type - The most common types of crashes are sideswipe (4), rear-end (4), broadside (4), and hit object (2).
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are improper turning (3), unsafe speed (2), unsafe lane change (2), traffic signal and signs (2), and automobile right of way (2).
Other - The severe collision was a broadside collision related to traffic signals and signs violation.
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• Retail activity with driveways in functional area of intersection resulting in rear end collisions. • Yellow/red clearance time or driver inattention related to broadside collisions
7. Twin Peaks Road & Midland Road
This intersection has the following characteristics:
This intersection of an arterial and collector street is located in a primarily residential zone in northeast Poway. Twin Peaks Road has two through lanes and a single left turn lane on both westbound and eastbound approaches . Midland Road has a single through lane in each direction, and a left turn lane with CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 26
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
a right turn pocket on the northbound approach and a single left turn lane on the southbound approach.
Bike lanes exist on both legs of Twin Peaks Road and the southern leg of Midland Road. No bike lanes exist on the northern leg of Midland Road but instead angled parking stalls exist on both sides. Twin Peaks Road has a speed limit of 45 mph; Midland Road has a speed limit of 35 mph. ADA ramps, and standard pedestrian push buttons. The City has recently provided a continental crosswalk at this intersection. The primary zoning near the intersection is residential - suburban with housing on the northwest and southwest corners. The Poway Adult School and facilities for Poway Unified School District sits on the northeast corner and a church sits on the southeast corner of the intersection.
Twin Peaks Road & Midland Road
Collision Summary
The intersection of Twin Peaks Road and Midland Road had nine total collisions, and an intersection rank of 7th by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $2.2 million.
Severity- fatal (1 ), visible injury (2), complaint of pain (3), and property damage only (3).
Type - The most common types of crashes are rear-end (3), sideswipe (2), and vehicle/pedestrian (2).
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are improper turning (2), unsafe speed (1 ), traffic signal and signs (1 ), pedestrian violation (1 ), pedestrian right of way (1 ), and following too closely (1 ).
Other - The fatal collision was a vehicle/pedestrian collision caused by a pedestrian violation.
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 27
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
• There were nine collisions over the five year period, with two of these pedestrian related. • Roadway curve on Twin Peaks Road may impact signal visibility • Downgrades on two approaches contribute to longer breaking distances.
8. Poway Road & Espola Road
This intersection has the following characteristics:
This intersection of a collector and arterial street is located in eastern Poway and is the last major intersection on Poway Road before encountering SR-67. Poway Road has two through lanes that merge into a single lane with a single left turn lane on the eastbound approach. The westbound approach of Poway Road has a single through lane with a single right turn pocket. Espola Road terminates at the intersection and has a single left turn and right turn lane on the southbound approach and a single through lane going northbound . Bike lanes exist briefly on Espola Road going northbound before ending .
Bicycle accommodations north of that point consists of sharrow pavement markings. No bike facilities exist on Poway Road at the intersection . Poway Road has a speed limit of 50 mph and Espola Road has a speed limit of 30 mph before changing to 45 mph at Range Park Road. Continental crosswalks exist crossing Espola Road and include standard pedestrian push buttons . Basic crosswalks only exist crossing the west leg of Poway Road. There are no ADA ramps and sidewalks at the intersection. The zoning near the intersection is predominantly rural with no structures in the vicinity. A single trailhead on the northwest corner exists and a dirt access road exists on Espola Road south of the intersection .
Poway Road & Espola Road
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 28
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Collision Summary
The intersection of Poway Road and Espola Road had 11 total collisions, and an intersection rank of 8th by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $2.1 million.
Severity- severe injury (1), visible injury (2), complaint of pain (2), and property damage only (6).
Type - The most common types of crashes are rear-end (4), and sideswipe (4).
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are unsafe speed (6), driving or bicycling under the influence of alcohol or drug (2), and automobile right of way (1). One collision has unknown collision factors.
Other - The severe collision was a sideswipe caused by unknown factors.
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• At this location, Poway Road has a rural character.
• Unsafe travel speeds approaching intersection identified as primary collision factor. The westbound downgrade contributes to a longer breaking distance.
9. Poway Road & Community Road
This intersection has the following characteristics:
This intersection of an arterial and collector street is located in Poway's central commercial district. Poway Road has two through lanes in each direction with two left turn lanes and a single right turn pocket on the eastbound approach and two left turn lanes on the westbound approach. Community Road has two through lanes in both directions with two left turn lanes and a right turn pocket on the southbound approach and two left turn lanes on the northbound approach. Bike lanes exist on all legs of the intersection with the western leg of Poway Road having buffered bike lanes in both direction. Poway Road and Community Road have speed limits of 35 mph in both direction. ADA ramps and standard pedestrian push buttons exist on all corners of the intersection. Continental crosswalks exist crossing Poway Road on the west and Community Road on the north, while basic crosswalks exist at all other pedestrian crossing points. Commercial zoning exists on all corners of the intersection including shopping centers with retail shops and restaurants. The City has been awarded funds from HSIP Cycle 10 to provide advanced dilemma zone protection at this intersection.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 29
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Poway Road & Community Road
Collision Summary
The intersection of Poway Road & Community Road had 23 total collisions, and an intersection rank of 9th by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $1 million.
Severity- visible injury (2), complaint of pain (7), and property damage only (14).
Type - The most common types of crashes are rear-end (12), broadside (7), and sideswipe (3).
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are unsafe speed (8), traffic signals and signs (6), unsafe lane change (2), unsafe starting or backing, and driving or bicycling under the influence of alcohol or drug.
Other - There are not fatal or severe injury collisions at this intersection.
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• While posted speed is 35 mph, this section of Poway Road has many mid-block left turn entrances so that travel speeds of 35 mph or higher may result the collision cause of unsafe travel speed. • Intersection is congested; speeds are generally lower than other intersections studied with the result of lower collision severity.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 30
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
10. Scripps Poway Parkway & Pomerado Road
This intersection has the following characteristics:
This intersection of two arterial streets is located in southwest Poway and acts as the entrance and primary thoroughfare through the Poway Business Park to the east. Scripps Poway Parkway has three through lanes and two left turn lanes on the westbound and eastbound approaches. Pomerado Road has two through lanes in each direction with two left turn lanes and a right turn pocket on the northbound approach and two left turn lanes on the southbound approach . Buffered bike lanes exist on both legs of Scripps Poway Parkway and the north leg of Pomerado Road. Standard bike lanes exist on the south leg of Pomerado Road. Scripps Poway Parkway has a speed limit of 55 mph and Pomerado Road has a speed limit of 45 mph . ADA ramps, standard pedestrian push buttons, and continental crosswalks exist on all corners of the intersection. The zoning near the intersection consist of a mix of commercial, residential - suburban and semi-rural, and open space. A small shopping center with a gas station and housing exist on the southeast corner and semi-rural housing exist on the northwest corner. Open space land use and a trail head is located on the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection. Commercial warehouses and light industrial business are located further east along Scripps Poway Parkway.
Scripps Poway Parkway & Pomerado Road
Collision Summary
The intersection of Scripps Poway Parkway and Pomerado Road had 15 total collisions, and an intersection rank of 10th by the EDPO score method with an EDPO cost of $900,000.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 31
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
Severity - visible injury (3), complaint of pain (6), and property damage only (6).
Type - The most common types of crashes are broadside (7), rear-end (5), sideswipe (2), and head-on (1 ).
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are traffic signal and signs (5), improper turning (3), and unsafe speed (2).
Other - There are not fatal or severe injury collisions at this intersection .
Contribut ing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• Grades and roadway curves may limit signal visibility • Higher travel speeds on intersection approaches
4.2.2 Roadway Segment
Poway Road - Oak Knoll Road to Garden Road
The 2.6-mile-long section of Poway Road extends from just east of Oak Knoll Road near the western boundary of the City of Poway to just west of the intersection with Garden Road. This stretch of Poway Road is the primary west to east arterial through downtown Poway and includes mid-block collisions that are not part of the intersection analysis. Poway Road is a four lane arterial street and has a post speed limit of 35 mph throughout the segment. This stretch of Poway Road provides access to commercial, business and retail stores. The east side of the segment from Garden Road to Vista View Drive is less dense and includes a mix of residential housing as well as smaller businesses. Landscaped medians exist for the entire length of this road segment and left turn pockets are provided throughout the segment.
Bike lanes exist on both the westbound and eastbound directions of Poway Road for the entire length of the segment.
Example section of Poway Road east of Community Road
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 32
November 15, 2022, Item #4
INTERSECTION PATTERNS AND DEFICIENCIES
,,,,!
Example section of Poway Road from Community Road to Midland Road Collision Summary
This segment had 75 total collisions (includes intersection collisions) and had a collision rate of 102 per 100M VMT, and an EDPO cost of $21 .6 million .
Severity- severe injury (5), visible injury (11), complaint of pain (24), and property damage only (35).
Type - The most common types of crashes are broadside (27), rear-end (26), and hit object (10).
Factor - The most common causes of crashes are automobile right of way (27), unsafe speed (23), unsafe lane change (7), and driving or bicycling under the influence of alcohol or drug (7).
Contributing Factors
Based on the review of the intersection, the following factors may potentially contribute to collisions:
• Closely spaced driveway and midblock intersections leading to many locations where turn movement occur.
4.3 Potential Safety Countermeasures
A number of system safety countermeasures could be applied to intersection and segments with similar characteristics to the intersections reviewed above. A detailed countermeasure description is provided in Section 5. For intersections with higher speed approaches, potential countermeasures include advanced dilemma zone detection or installing beacons as advanced warning . For intersections with high traffic and high turning movements, potential countermeasures include modifying signal timing or adding additional signal hardware. Intersection approaches with limited signal visibility can be addressed by trimming trees, adding signal ahead signage and pavement markings, and/or flashing beacons, Potential countermeasures for road segments with a high density of left turn movements include extending medians or closing median openings to reduce/consolidate left turn movements.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 33
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COUNTERMEASURES
5.0 COUNTERMEASURES
This section of the report utilizes the crash pattern information presented in the previous section to evaluate safety countermeasures for the locations described in Section 4.0. The safety countermeasures reviewed are those developed by Caltrans and described in the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual (CA-LRSM). Caltrans has used information from the Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse and three other FHWA published safety manuals - Roadway Departure Safety, Intersection Safety, and Roadways Safety Information Analysis - in conjunction with its own research with the Safe Transportation Research and Education Center (SafeTREC) to develop the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual (CA LRSM). A full list of countermeasures listed in the Caltrans LRSM are included in Appendix C. Additional countermeasures can be found at the Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse. (http ://www .cmfclearinghouse.org /).
5.1 COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION
Table 5.1 includes a list of safety countermeasures from the LRSM that based upon the analysis completed are the most applicable to address collision patterns in Poway. The table provides information on the countermeasure number in the LRSM, a brief description, and applicability to type of crash. The Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) used in the Caltrans local HSIP program associated with the countermeasure, the project life or length of time the measure will be effective, the maximum federal reimbursement ratio, and the degree that the countermeasure can be part of a systemic approach.
The countermeasures listed address the high crash intersections and roadway segments. The countermeasure list indicates the crash type, crash reduction factors (CRF), federal funding eligibility for HSIP projects and the systemic opportunity.
The information included in the countermeasures are:
• Crash Types - "All", "P & B" (Pedestrian and Bicycle), "Night", • CRF - Crash Reduction Factor used for HSIP calls-for-projects. • Expected Life - 10 years or 20 years.
• Federal Funding Eligibility- the maximum federal reimbursement ratio.
The countermeasure description refers to each countermeasure with an identification letter and number.
The letters refer to the following:
• 'S' countermeasures apply to signalized intersections. • 'NS' countermeasures apply to non-signalized intersections within a road segment.
The list of HSIP approved countermeasures is provided in the Appendix. This list consists of thoroughly researched countermeasures used by Caltrans that apply to signalized and unsignalized intersections and roadways. Using this list, the Caltrans safety countermeasures were identified that respond to the collision patterns for the identified high crash intersections and segments.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 34
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COUNTERMEASURES
Table 5-1: Applicable Safety Countermeasures
Expected Life Federal
No. Countermeasure Description Crash Type CRF Funding (Years) Eligibility Improve Signal Hardware: Lenses,
S2 Back-Plates, Mounting, Size, and All 15% I 10 100%
Number
S3 Improve signal timing (coordination, All 15% 10 50% phase~,. red, yellow, or o_p_eration) S4 Provide Advanced Dilemma Zone All 40% 10 100% detection S10 I -· Instill f lashi~g beaco~~ a~ ~dv;nced i All I 30% 10 100% I warning I S12 Install raised median on approaches I All f 25% 20 90% - - -- ---
i NS6 Install /upgrade intersection warning All 15% 10 100% _Jreg~ tory ~gnage NS14 Install/modify raised median All l 25% 20 90%
- - - - -
5.2 COU NTERM EASU RE AP PUCA TION
This section provides description of the identified safety countermeasures.
S2. Improve signal hardware : lenses, back -plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number Install at signalized intersections with broadside and rear-end crashes occurring where drivers have difficulty seeing traffic signals sufficiently in advance . This countermeasure can include new LED lighting, signal back plates, retro-reflective tape outlining the back plates, or visors to increase signal visibility, larger signal heads, relocation of the signal heads, additional signal heads, providing near side signals, or high mount signals at locations where intersection visibility may be affected. Two examples where signal heads have been used are shown below. One is a near side signal, which provides a signal closer to approaching vehicles. The second is a high mount signal that provides additional sight lines . "-~----=------- ·----~---==
Example of near side signal Example of high mount signal Locations: Consider at major intersections where congestion present or views obstructed.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 35
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COUNT ERM EASU RES
S3. Improve signal timing (coordination , phases, red, yellow, or operation ) Install at locations that have a crash history at multiple signalized intersections along a corridor.
Signalization improvements may include adding phases, lengthening clearance intervals, eliminating or restricting higher-risk movements, and coordinating signals at multiple locations.
LOC B I
Clock
Ro,i l-T lm e
Cloo k
sp lit
t
I
cycle ! length
ll 1n.1
12; ,O;OO AM IJ.O .40 AM
Example signal timing plan where red and yellow times would be adjusted Locations to use countermeasure : along a corridor with interconnected signals and at individual signals to address rear end or broadside collisions within the intersection .
S4. Provide advanced dilemma zone detection for high-speed approaches This countermeasure is effective on high-speed corridors (35 MPH and above) that have a high frequency of right angle and rear end crashes. An Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection system enhances safety at signalized intersections by modifying traffic control signal timing to reduce the number of drivers that may have difficulty deciding whether to stop or proceed during a yellow phase. This may reduce rear-end crashes associated with unsafe stopping and angle crashes due to running a red light. Improved traffic safety is accomplished by adjusting the start time of the yellow-signal phase either earlier or later, based on observed vehicle locations and speeds.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 36
November 15, 2022, Item #4
I .......... i.. ....... Ditc ,11 111;1 zone ............... ~ ..... , ◄ . ► i
l.ikclygn
Graphic showing dilemma zone between stop and go points
COUNTERMEASURES
Locations to use countermeasure: Major signalized intersections with high speed approaches (over 35 mph) .
S10 Install flashing beacons as advance warning
Use at signalized intersections with crashes that are a result of drivers being unaware of the intersection or are unable to see the traffic control device in time to comply, due to grades, curves or obstructions.
Most advance warning flashing beacons can be powered by solar, thus reducing the issues relating to power source.
Solar powered flashing beacon on Ted Williams Parkway
Locations to use countermeasure: roadways with curves where signal heads may be difficult to see in advance
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 37
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COUNTERMEASURES
S12. Install raised median on approaches
Raised medians next to left-turn lanes at intersections offer a cost-effective means for reducing crashes and improving operations . The raised medians prohibit left turns into and out of driveways that may be located too close to the functional area of the intersection. Raised medians at intersections may be most effective in retrofit situations where high volumes of turning vehicles have degraded operations and safety.
Painted median could be converted to raised median
Locations to use countermeasure : Major intersections with collisions experience which do not have raised medians at intersection approaches.
NS6/0ther . Install/upgrade larger or additional intersection warning/regulatory signs or markings Signage or lane markings can be used in some locations to increase driver awareness of traffic signals ahead or to regulate turning movements such as right turn on red. New sign guidance is period ically developed and described in the Manual of Uniform Control Devices (MUTCD).
NO
I TURN
[~N- ED
Example sign upgrades
Example of advance signing and pavement marking for signal ahead Locations to use countermeasure : Modify signage at existing locations as needed.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 38
November 15, 2022, Item #4
COUNTERMEASURES
NS14. Install raised median
Raised medians with left-turn lanes at intersections offer a cost-effective means for reducing crashes and improving operations . The raised medians prohibit left turns into and out of driveways that may be located too close to the functional area of the intersection .
Locations to use countermeasure: at midblock locations with high turning movements and high broadside collisions.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
47 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
NON-ENGINEERING SAFETY SOLUTIONS
6.0 NON-ENGINEERING SAFETY SOLUTIONS
The Poway Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) strives to make Poway's roads safer for all roadway users. The comprehensive approach to safety incorporates all elements of the "4 Es of Safety": Engineering, Enforcement, Education and Emergency Response Services. This approach recognizes that not all locations can be addressed solely by infrastructure improvements . Incorporating the 4 Es of Safety can achieve significant safety improvements and reduce the severity and frequency of collisions throughout a jurisdiction.
Some of the common violation types that may require a comprehensive approach are speeding, red light running, aggressive driving, unsafe lane changes, failure-to-yield to pedestrians, distracted driving, and driving while impaired. When locations are identified as having these types of violations, coordination with the appropriate law enforcement agencies is needed to arrange visible targeted enforcement to reduce the potential for future driving violations and related crashes and injuries.
6.1 YOUNG DRIVERS
Younger drivers' relative lack of experience and judgment makes them more likely to engage in risky behaviors, such as speeding or distracted driving . Therefore, educating young drivers on the importance of safe driving practices is a key pillar of the City's LRSP. While youth drunk driving is a problem in many communities, data reported for 2018 by the California Office of Traffic Safety for Poway shows that the number of youth collisions involving drinking is low. Even so, the City may consider implementing programs, warning youth about the dangers of drinking and driving.
The following non-engineering programs or program elements could address safety risks for young drivers.
Education
• Expand school safety programs to bring Sheriff Deputies to Elementary School, Middle School and High Schools that will address speeding and texting while driving. • Start a social media campaign at local middle and high schools, encouraging students to post videos on the danger of using their phones while driving .
6.2 BICYCLISTS
The City of Poway is committed to becoming a more bicycle-friendly community . In the 2018 OTS Rankings, Poway ranked 93rd among the 97 peer cities in California for the number of serious bicycle collisions, indicating a relatively safe bicycle environment. The following are programs that can be considered:
Education
• Provide Bike Safe programs for persons of all ages and training courses for first-time adult riders. • Host hands-on Bicycle Safety events at local schools. These can include Bicycle Safety Skills Programs, which teach students how to operate bicycles safely, and walk/bike to school days, carnival-like events featuring interactive educational activities about bicycling .
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 40
November 15, 2022, Item #4
NON-ENGINEERING SAFETY SOLUTIONS
• Host interactive Bicycle Education programs at local schools. These programs can include bicycle rodeos, enclosed training courses with challenges addressing different skill areas (e.g., helmet fitting, starting and stopping, and rules of the road). • Coordinate with the Sheriff's Department on bicycle rules and safety considerations, so that enforcement of bicycle-related traffic violations can occur.
Enforcement
• Implement targeted enforcement programs to focus law enforcement resources to areas where bicyclists face a high risk of collision or tend to engage in unsafe practices. Programs should be designed to both educate and enforce.
• Provide enforcement, at peak hours in high-collision areas, to catch vehicles encroaching on bicycle lanes or aggressively changing lanes.
6.3 PEDESTRIANS
Walking is perhaps the most universal form of transportation. All drivers have to travel on foot between their parking spot and the store or office. Therefore, pedestrian safety risks pose a crucial challenge to any local roadway safety plan. Programs to support walking should be considered to maintain or even enhance the pedestrian walking environment.
Like bicyclists, pedestrians can bear an excessively high risk of severe injury in collisions. In the 2018 OTS Rankings, Poway ranked 84th among the 97 peer cities in California for the number of killed or injured pedestrians, indicating a relatively safe pedestrian environment. For young students walking to school, there was one serious injury collision in 2018. The followings are programs that can be considered:
Education
• Incorporate pedestrian safety education into Physical Education classes in the Poway Unified School District.
• Host hands-on pedestrian safety events at local schools. These can include pedestrian safety skills programs-teaching students how to cross the street safely and walk/bike to school days, carnival like events featuring interactive educational activities about walking. • Host interactive pedestrian education programs at local schools. These include pedestrian rodeos, enclosed training courses with challenges addressing different skill areas (e.g., rules of the road, blind spots, and directions to look in when crossing the street).
Enforcement
• Periodically enforce locations with high crossing activity to monitor and cite traffic law violations by motorists and pedestrians.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 41
November 15, 2022, Item #4
NON-ENGINEERING SAFETY SOLUTIONS
6.4 SPEEDING
Speeding contributes significantly to crash frequency and severity. For instance, a car hitt ing a pedestrian is eight times more likely to kill that pedestrian when moving at 40 miles per hour than when moving at 20 miles per hour. In the local context, speeding is the most common Primary Collision Factor and the most frequent cause of rear-end crashes. Driving at unsafe speeds caused 50 percent of total rear-end crashes in Poway. Reducing rear-end and other speeding-related collisions requires educating drivers on the dangers of speeding and stepping enforcement at intersections. Programs that can help with reducing speeding include:
Education
• Create a social media campaign
Enforcement
• Continue utilizing radar speed feedback signs at periodic intervals along arterials with reported speeding. These technologies display passing drivers' travel speed below a sign with the posted speed limit, thus showing whether drivers are traveling over the speed limit. ' • Continue to deploy Sheriff Deputies equipped with radar or LIDAR technology at strategic locations to ticket speeding drivers.
• Provide additional offices and equipment for officers to enforce speeding and red light running.
Examine grant fund ing from OTS or other sources to support this activity.
6.5 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs is dangerous since alcohol and drug use impair judgment and perception . Poway ranked 73rd out of 97 peer cities of similar size in the 2018 OTS Rankings for serious collisions that involved alcohol. Programs addressing DUI that can be considered include:
Education
• Re-establish or stage an interactive simulation program for high school students. The interactive simulation program aims to challenge high school juniors and seniors about drinking, driving, and mature decision making.
Encouragement
• Partner with Uber/Lyft and alcohol-serving restaurants and bars in Poway to encourage use of rideshare usage to restaurant and bar patrons.
Enforcement
• Utilize a Checkpoint Program to provide enforcement.
• Monitor local liquor stores and bars suspected of selling alcohol to minors.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 42
November 15, 2022, Item #4
NON-ENGINEERING SAFETY SOLUTIONS
6.6 DISTRACTED DRIVING
Distracted driving refers to any activity that diverts the driver's attention. Common examples of distracted driving activities include non -hand-free mobile phone use, eating and drinking , and conversation . Texting on the phone or talking to another passenger, even for a moment , can have fatal consequences when driving at full speed. Therefore, reducing distracted driving improves road safety. Many of the traffic tickets issued in Poway pertained to distracted driving, with non-hand-free mobile phones use a common cause of ticket citation . Programs that can be considered include :
Education
• Start an Anti-Distracted Driving educational program in local high schools. The program can feature events, safety assemblies, and education material. The program can parallel with the drunk driving program (discussed under the Young Drivers and Drunk Driving Section).
Encouragement
• Set up portable changeable message signs to display drunk driving, distracted driving, speeding, and other factors.
6.7 EMERGENCY RESPONSE MANAGEMENT
Emergency medical services help reduce crash-related injuries and fatalities through high-quality medical care at the scene and during transport to a trauma center. It is recommended that the City of Poway continue to coordinate with the Sheriff's Department and local hospitals and medical centers to continue to improve the emergency response to collisions.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 43
November 15, 2022, Item #4
PROJECT EVALUATION
7.0 PROJECT EVALUATION
7.1 HIGHWAY SAFElY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP)
The Highway Safety Program (HSIP) is a USDOT Federal-aid program with the purpose of reducing the number of fatal and serious injury collisions on public roads. Caltrans supports this program by funding Local Roadway Safety Plans and by providing competitive HSIP project funding every two years. The next call for projects is anticipated in May 2022. The application involves developing a project cost estimate, safety improvement countermeasure evaluation, crash data input and Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) calculation .
The minimum project cost and benefit/cost (B/C) ratio requirement, which was a minimum project cost of $200,000 and a project that achieves a minimum B/C ratio of 3.5 for HSIP Cycle 10. The average B/C ratio of the approved projects in the past HSIP cycles is 12.3. Cost estimates for the project groups listed below are provided in Appendix D.
7.2 EXAMPLE HSIP PROJECTS
7 .2. 1 Advance Dilemma Zone Detection
The 10 signalized intersections described in Section 4 were the intersections selected to estimate a benefit-cost ratio for reducing collisions by providing advance dilemma zone detection. The three intersections on Poway Road have already received funding through HSIP Cycle 10. The remaining seven intersections are evaluated here. This evaluation is based on the number of collisions, the collision costs, project costs and the estimated effectiveness of the countermeasure . The benefits were calculated using the HSIP Analyzer form provided by Caltrans for use in preparing HSIP applications . The project is shown to provide a benefit/cost ratio of 91.6. A grant for this countermeasure is 100% funded with no match required from the City.
Crash data for the seven project intersections:
Project cost estimate to provide advance dilemma zone detection:
Average 30% 20%
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Admin/Engr
Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Contingency Project Total Benefit/cost ratio:
Benefit/ HSIP HSIP Local
Benefit Cost ($) Cost Max . h Amount Amount Ratio S are $14,742,960 $327,600 45.00 100% $327,600 $0
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 44
November 15, 2022, Item #4
PROJECT EVALUATION
7.2.2 Signal Timing
This project group includes higher collision locations at signalized intersections where collisions may be reduced through adjustments in signal timing. The benefits were calculated using the HSIP Analyzer form provided by Caltrans for use in preparing HSIP applications . The project is shown to provide a benefit/cost ratio of 103.8. However, the grant funding for this countermeasure is only 50% of the cost.
Countermeasures: S3. Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation).
Signal time changes can include improved coordination, additional red or yellow times, and pedestrian walk times .
Crash data for the project intersections :
176 8 27 50 90
Project cost estimate to provide updated signal timing :
Average 30% 20%
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Admin/Engr
Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Contingency Project Total Benefit/cost ratio:
. Benefit/ HSIP HSIP Local
Benefit Cost($) Cost Max
Ratio Share Amount Amount
$7,018,231 $156,000 44.99 50% $78,000 $78,000
7.3 FUNDING SOURCES
Several state and federal grant programs offer to fund non -engineering roadway safety projects. The California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) Active Transportation Program (ATP) encourages bicycle and pedestrian use in the state by funding programs that increase bike or pedestrian mode share or improve bicycle or pedestrian safety. Caltrans also administers the Sustainable Communities Grant Program, which awards grants to municipal projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and support Multi-modal transportation . The Sustainable Communities Program prioritizes projects that solicit stakeholder and community engagement and support state policies like the 2040 California Transportation Plan. The California Office of Traffic Safety awards grants for projects addressing any one or more of ten priority areas, including Driving Under the Influence, Distracted Driving, Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety, Sheriff Enforcement, Safety Data Collection, and Marketing/Publicity Campaigns.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 45
53 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
PROJECT EVALUATION
At the federal level, the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program funds technology to promote safety and efficiency in the transportation system. The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds roadway improvements on any public roadway. Table 5.2 provides a list of transportation safety programs and funding sources.
Table 7.2 Transportation Safety Funding Sources Summary Agency Source Eligible Programs Areas Addressed
Federal Highway Highway Safety Any work on public roads, bikeways and Administration Improvement pedestrian paths/trails. For the most part, Safety projects (FHWA) Program (HSIP) only engineering projects are eligible.
Advanced Funds advanced transportation and
Transportation and congestion management technologies to Federal Highway Congestion improve safety, efficiency and Digital Enforcement; Administration Management performance. Examples of funded project Technology Partnerships (FHWA) Technologies types include advanced traveler Deployment information systems, data collection, and
Program analysis efforts3.
California Local government projects that improve Bicycle and Pedestrian Department of Active the safety or increase the mode share of Engineering projects, Transportation Transportation bicycling and walking. Additional program Education and (Caltrans) Program (ATP) objectives include reducing emissions and Enforcement enhancing public health4.
The program awards "Competitive Grants"
to local governments. These grants
Active Transportation
California prioritize projects that reduce Greenhouse
Department of Sustainable Gas Emissions, support multi-modal Communities Grant transportation, involve stakeholder/ Transportation Program community engagement and support (Caltrans) related plans like the California Education Transportation Plan and California
Complete Streets Framework5 .
Driving under the
Programs should address one of ten influence of
California Office Office of Traffic priority areas (six relevant ones listed to the Drugs/Alcohol (DUI) of Traffic Safety Safety (OTS) Grants right). Grant recipients should expect to wait up to 90 days before being Distracted Driving
reimbursed/funded, and should be able to Pedestrian/Bike Safety CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 46
November 15, 2022, Item #4
PROJECT EVALUATION
Agency Source Eligible Programs
provide traffic safety data to justify funded
programs 6.
Sources:
7. Highway Safety Improvement Program Guidelines, April 2076
2. Highway safety improvement program, Pub. L. No. 748, 23 US Code (2075). httos./lwww.law.cornel/edu/uscode/text/23/748.
Areas Addressed
Sheriff Enforcement
Roadway Safety and Data
Collection
Social Media/Marketing
3. Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment. February 2076. httos.//www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/advtranscongmgmtfscfm.
4. 2027 Active Transportation Program Guidelines. fvlarch 25, 2020. Resolution G-20-37.
5. California Department of Transportation. Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program. December 2079.
6. California Office of Traffic Safety Grant fvlanual for Federal Fiscal Year 2020. December 2079.
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 47
November 15, 2022, Item #4
LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) EVALUATION
8.0 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
EVALUATION
Since the Local Roadway Safety Plan aims to reduce collision risk, the Plan's effectiveness should be evaluated in terms of collision reduction. To this end, the City of Poway should secure collision data from the California Office of Traffic Safety1 collision ranking system and California Highway Patrol's Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS)2 on an annual basis. The collision trends following the LRSP's adoption provide indicators of the plan's success. The collision analysis should break out collisions by the following categories.
• Total collisions
• Fatality and severe injury collisions
• Pedestrian collisions
• Bicyclist collisions
• Collisions that involved bicyclists and pedestrians that are over 65 or under 15 • Collisions that are caused by drunk drivers
These categories are included in both the OTS and SWITRS statistics. For each category, consider calculating an average for the most recent three years every year. The City can then plot the three-year average against the averages for past years to derive a general trend line. A downward-sloping trend line indicates an improvement in safety conditions. An upward sloping trend line suggests that additional safety measures should be considered. In the latter instance, the City should conduct further review and update the plan. 1 California Office of Traffic and Safety. https:/lw ww.ots.co.gov/ots-and-traffic-safetv/ 2 UC Berkeley Transportation Injury and Safety Mapping System. https:/ltims.berkeley.edu/help/SWITRS.php #fntro to SWITRS CITY OF POWAY I LRSP Page 48
November 15, 2022, Item #4
APPENDIX A - Intersection Collisions
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
57 of 73
APPENDIX
November 15, 2022, Item #4
Severe Other Complaint of Total
No. Intersection Fatal Injury Injury Pain PDO Collisions 1 POMERADO RD & POWAY RD 0 1 7 4 14 26
2 POMERADO RD & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 2 13 10 25
3 COMMUNITY RD & POWAY RD 0 0 2 7 14 23
4 POMERADO RD & TED WILLIAMS PKWY 0 1 3 3 8 15
5 MIDLAND RD & POWAY RD 0 1 1 4 8 14
6 POMERADO RD & SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 0 3 5 6 14
7 COMMUNITY RD & SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 2 0 3 9 14
8 POWAY RD & RT 67 0 3 1 2 6 12
9 COMMUNITY RD & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 2 1 5 4 12
10 SILVERSET ST & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 2 5 5 12
11 ESPOLA RD & POWAY RD 0 1 2 2 6 11
12 OAK KNOLL RD & POMERADO RD 0 0 3 1 5 9
13 MIDLAND RD & TWIN PEAKS RD 1 0 2 3 3 9
14 CARRIAGE RD & POWAY RD 0 1 1 1 6 9
15 ESPOLA RD & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 5 2 2 9
16 POWAY RD & SILVER LAKE DR 0 0 2 4 1 7
17 COMMUNITY RD & DANIELSON CT 0 0 1 1 5 7
18 MONTE VISTA RD & POMERADO RD 0 0 1 2 4 7
19 AUBREY ST & COMMUNITY RD 0 0 1 2 3 6
20 CIVIC CENTER DR & POWAY RD 0 0 2 1 3 6
21 ESPOLA RD & TITAN WY 0 0 0 2 4 6
22 METATE LN & POMERADO RD 0 0 2 2 2 6
23 COMMUNITY RD & HILLEARY PL 0 0 0 1 4 5
24 DEERWOOD ST & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 2 2 1 5
25 HILLNDALE WY & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 2 2 1 5
26 TWIN PEAKS RD & WOODCREEK RD 0 1 1 1 2 5
27 COMMUNITY RD & STOWE DR 0 0 1 1 3 5
28 FRANCINE TER & POWAY RD 0 0 0 2 3 5
29 CIVIC CENTER DR & COMMUNITY RD 0 0 0 2 2 4
30 CLAIRE DR & GARDEN RD 0 0 0 2 2 4
31 DANIELSON ST & SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 0 1 2 1 4
32 SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY & TECH CENTER DR 0 2 0 1 1 4
33 CAMINO DEL NORTE & POMERADO RD 0 1 0 2 1 4
34 MAPLEWOOD ST & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 1 3 4
35 TED WILLIAMS PKWY & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 1 1 2 4
36 ESPOLA RD & LOS NIETOS AV 0 0 0 3 1 4
37 COLONY DR & POMERADO RD 0 0 2 2 0 4
38 CARRIAGE RD & OAK KNOLL RD 0 1 0 0 3 4
39 GARDEN RD & POWAY RD 0 0 1 0 3 4
40 SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY & STOWE DR 0 0 1 2 1 4
41 HILLEARY PL & MIDLAND RD 0 1 0 2 1 4
42 GENERAL ATOMICS WY & SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 0 1 1 1 3
43 POWAY RD & RIDGEDALE DR 0 0 1 0 2 3
44 LEONE WY & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 3 0 3
45 COMMUNITY RD & KIRKHAM RD 0 0 0 2 1 3
46 CROSTHWAITE CIR & STOWE DR 0 1 0 0 2 3
47 CHAPARRAL WY & RT 67 0 1 0 0 2 3
48 AUBREY ST & MIDLAND RD 0 0 0 0 3 3
58 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
49 PARKWAY CENTRE DR & SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 0 1 0 2 3
SO COMMUNITY RD & METATE LN 0 1 1 0 1 3
51 BOWRON RD & POWAY RD 0 0 2 1 0 3
52 MILLARDS RD & POWAY RD 0 0 1 0 2 3
53 OAK KNOLL DR & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 3 3
54 COMMUNITY RD & GREGG ST 0 0 1 0 2 3
55 COUNTRY DAY RD & ESPOLA RD 0 0 0 1 2 3
56 GATE DR & POWAY RD 0 0 0 1 2 3
57 COMMUNITY RD & DANIELSON ST 0 0 1 0 2 3
SB IPAI WAAYPUKTRL & POWAY RD 0 0 1 2 0 3
59 POMERADO RD & VAUGHN RD 0 0 1 1 1 3
60 BRIGHTON AV & EDGEMOOR ST 0 1 0 0 1 2
61 MATCH POINT DR & POWAY RD 0 0 1 1 0 2
62 FRAME RD & MCFERON RD 0 0 0 0 2 2
63 ESPOLA RD & HIGH VALLEY RD 0 0 0 0 2 2
64 KIRKHAM RD & SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 0 0 1 1 2
65 IRON MOUNTAIN DR & RT 67 0 0 0 0 2 2
66 HIGH PINE ST & SHIRRA AV 0 0 0 0 2 2
67 ESPOLA RD & TRAILWIND RD 0 0 0 0 2 2
68 DEL PONIENTE RD & ESPOLA RD 0 0 0 1 1 2
69 POWAY RD & VISTA VIEW DR 0 0 1 0 1 2
70 COMMUNITY RD & TWIN PEAKS 0 0 0 0 2 2
71 GATEWAY PARK RD & POMERADO RD 0 0 1 0 1 2
72 BUCKLEY ST & MORENE ST 0 0 0 0 2 2
73 PLATINUM PL & RT 67 0 0 1 0 1 2
74 LOLA WY & POWAY RD 0 0 0 2 0 2
75 TIERRA BONITA RD & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 0 2 2
76 BERNARDO HEIGHTS PKWY & POMERADO RD 0 0 1 0 1 2
77 COMMUNITY RD & KETRON AV 0 0 1 1 0 2
78 POMERADO RD & ROBISON BL 0 0 0 1 1 2
79 ESPOLA RD & VALLE VERDE RD 0 1 1 0 0 2
80 ESPOLA RD & MARTINCOIT RD 0 0 0 0 2 2
81 METATE LN & RANCHO CABALLO RD 0 0 0 1 1 2
82 MINA DE ORO RD & RT 67 1 0 0 1 0 2
83 POWAY MESA DR & TRIUMPH DR 0 0 2 0 0 2
84 TWIN CIRCLE WY & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 1 1 2
85 COMMUNITY RD & GREGG CT 0 0 0 1 1 2
86 CREE DR & PAPAGO DR 0 0 0 0 2 2
87 ADAH LN & POWAY RD 0 0 1 0 1 2
88 ROBERTO RIO RD & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 1 1 2
89 ESPOLA RD & MORNING AIR RD 0 0 0 1 1 2
90 BOWRON RD & CIVIC CENTER DR 0 0 1 1 0 2
91 CYNTHIA LN & MIDLAND RD 0 0 1 0 1 2
92 CARRIAGE RD & ROCA GRANDE DR 0 0 0 0 2 2
93 CLOUDCROFT DR & ESPOLA RD 0 0 0 1 1 2
94 MCFERON RD & POMERADO RD 0 0 1 1 0 2
95 PARKWAY CENTRE DR & STOWE DR 0 0 1 0 1 2
96 ESPOLA RD & LAKE POWAY RD 0 0 1 0 1 2
97 POMERADO RD & TASSEL RD 0 0 0 1 1 2
98 OLIVE TREE LN & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 2 2
99 POWAY RD & WELTON LN 0 0 1 0 1 2
59 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
100 EVANSTON DR & POWAY RD 0 0 0 2 0 2
101 GOLDEN EYE & OLD POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
102 CASA AVENIDA & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
103 MILEPOST 12 & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
104 NORWALK ST & SYCAMORE AV 0 0 0 0 1 1
105 DANIELSON ST & STOWE DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
106 IOLA WY & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
107 TAUNT RD & TOBIASSON RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
10B ADRIAN ST & MIDLAND RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
109 KIRKHAM WY & SIKES PL 0 0 0 0 1 1
110 DEELAN LN & NEDDICK AV 0 0 0 0 1 1
111 GARDEN RD & WHITEWATER DR 0 1 0 0 0 1
112 COMMUNITY RD & OLIVE GROVE RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
113 HIDDEN VALLEY DR & QUIET HILLS DR 0 0 1 0 0 1
114 KIRKHAM RD & STOTLER CT 0 0 0 1 0 1
115 POWAY RD & TARASCAN DR 0 0 0 1 0 1
116 BIRCH TREE LN & COMUNA DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
117 IPAI WAAYPUK TRL/SILVER LAKE RD & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1 11B ROBISON ST & SILVER LAKE DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
119 POWAY RD & POWAY RD 13409 0 0 0 0 1 1
120 DEL POINTE RD & ESPOLA RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
121 CATAWBA DR & PEQUOT DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
122 KIRKHAM RD & PARNELL CT 0 1 0 0 0 1
123 BUCKWOOD ST & TRIUMPH DR 0 0 1 0 0 1
124 ACTON AV & MIRANDO ST 0 0 1 0 0 1
125 MCFERON RD & POWERS CT 0 0 1 0 0 1
126 GLEN OAK RD & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
127 POWAY RD & RIDGEDALE 0 0 0 0 1 1
128 EARLGATE CT & FAIRGATE DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
129 MCFERON RD & MOUNTAINSIDE DR 0 0 0 1 0 1
130 TRAILWIND RD & WILDGROVE RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
131 CICERO CT & CICERO WY 0 0 0 0 1 1
132 ESPOLA RD & EVERGREEN LN 0 0 0 0 1 1
133 ALORA ST & LOS OLIVOS AV 0 0 0 0 1 1
134 DEERWOOD ST & PEACHWOOD CT 0 0 0 0 1 1
135 BIRCH BROOK CT & RIOS RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
136 RIPARIAN RD & TITAN WY 0 0 0 0 1 1
137 PAPAGO ST & SILVERLAKE DR 0 0 0 1 0 1
138 DEL NORTE & INDIAN TRAIL RD 0 1 0 0 0 1
139 OLD POMERADO RD & PASEO COLINA 0 0 0 0 1 1
140 POMERADO & SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 0 0 1 0 1
141 METATE LN & YUKON WY 0 0 0 0 1 1
142 ROBISON BL & SILVER LAKE DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
143 GATEWAY PARK DR & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
144 COMMUNITY RD & HILLEARY PK 0 0 0 1 0 1
145 JOY AS CT & OLD WINERY WY 0 0 1 0 0 1
146 COMMUNITY RD & MET ATE DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
147 OAK KNOLL RD & SEILER ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
148 ESPOLA RD & NORTHCREST ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
149 CARRIAGE RD & PEQUOT DR 0 0 1 0 0 1
150 COMMUNITY RD & HILLERAY PL 0 0 0 1 0 1
60 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
151 CA YUGA DR & CREE RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
152 ALDERWOOD LN & SAINT ANDREWS DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
153 AMSO ST & KAITZ ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
154 ACTON AV & SELSEY ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
155 MCIVERS CT & STOWE DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
156 BLUE CRYSTAL TRL & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
157 SCIPPS POWAY PARKWAY & STOWE DR 0 0 1 0 0 1
158 VIA LA GARDENIA & VIA LA GITANO 0 0 0 0 1 1
159 ESPOLA RD & SUMMER SAGE RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
160 BLAISDELL PL & DANIELSON ST 0 0 0 1 0 1
161 HEATH RD & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
162 ESPOLA RD & OLD COACH RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
163 NEDDICK AV & SPRINGVALE ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
164 BRIAN PARK LN & POWAY MESA DR 0 0 1 0 0 1
165 DANIELSON ST & FIRST AMERICAN WY 0 0 0 1 0 1
166 KIRKHAM WY & TECH CENTER DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
167 ESPOLA RD & SUMMERFIELD LN 0 0 0 0 1 1
168 CREEK RD & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
169 DANIELSON ST & SCI PPS POWAY PARKWAY 0 0 0 0 1 1
170 SILVERSET ST POW & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
171 IPAVA DR & TIERRA BONITA RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
172 IRON MOUNTAIN RD & RT 67 0 0 0 1 0 1
173 BLUE CRYSTAL TRLS & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
174 ANNO RENO LN & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
175 COMMUNITY RD & SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 0 1 0 0 1
176 RIDGEDALE DR & ROBISON BL 0 0 1 0 0 1
177 POMARD WY & SOLERA WY 0 0 0 0 1 1
178 OLIVE MEADOWS DR & OLIVE MEADOWS PL 0 0 0 1 0 1
179 POMERADO HOSPITAL DRIVEWAY & POMERADO 0 0 0 1 0 1
180 POWAY RD & QUATE CT 0 0 0 0 1 1
181 ROBERTO RIO & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
182 GENERAL ATOMICS WY & KIRKHAM WY 0 0 0 0 1 1
183 POWAY RD & RIDGE RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
184 MCFERON RD & TOBIASSON RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
185 HEATH DR & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
186 MIDLAND RD & PUTNEY RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
187 9TH ST & POMERADO RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
188 PARKWAY CENTRE DR & SCI PPS POWAY PARKWA' 0 0 0 1 0 1 189 RT 67 & RT 67 14650 0 1 0 0 0 1
190 FRAME RD & TASSEL RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
191 GARDEN RD & STANDISH DR 0 1 0 0 0 1
192 MONTE VISTA DR & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
193 ARBOLITOS DR & BEECHWOOD ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
194 BUDWIN LN & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
195 GOLDEN WY & POWAY RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
196 KIRKHAM RD & STOLER COURT 0 0 0 0 1 1
197 COMMUNITY DR & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
198 POMERADO RD & VIA MONTE CLARO 0 0 0 0 1 1
199 DANIELSON ST & PARKWAY CENTRE DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
200 KIRKHAM RD & SCIPPS POWAY PARKWAY 0 0 0 1 0 1
201 SAINT ANDREWS DR & 'STARMONT WY 0 0 0 0 1 1
61 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
202 GARDEN RD & MONETGO DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
203 POWERS RD & TASSEL RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
204 BIRCH LN & HIDDEN VALLEY DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
205 BERLIN ST & OAK KNOLL RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
206 OAK KNOLL RD & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
207 IPAVA DR & PUTNEY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
208 FRAME RD & GLENOAK RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
209 BUCKSKIN TRL & RANCHO CABALLO RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
210 MARTINCOIT RD & MARTINCOIT RD 16127 0 0 0 1 0 1
211 POWAY RD & SILVER RIDGE RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
212 CARRIAGE RD & ROBISON BL 0 0 1 0 0 1
213 CLAIR DR & GARDEN RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
214 METATE LN & MONT AUK ST 0 0 0 1 0 1
215 POMERADO RD & RIMBACH RD 0 1 0 0 0 1
216 ALDRIN AV & SPRINGVALE ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
217 DURHULLEN DR & ESPOLA RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
218 MEADOW GLEN WY & OAK KNOLL RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
219 BOULDER VIEW DR & POMERADO RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
220 CIVIC CENTER DR & CREEK PARK DR 0 0 1 0 0 1
221 ELLIE LN & RT 67 0 0 0 0 1 1
222 FRAME RD & HOLLAND RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
223 POWAY EASTERN BOARDE LIMIT & SCRIPPS POWJ 0 0 0 0 1 1 224 ESPOLA RD & SUMMER FIELD LN 0 0 0 1 0 1
225 POMERADO RD & TREADWELL DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
226 HESTA ST & KAITZ ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
227 13122 COYOTERO DR. & T ARASCAN DR. 0 0 0 0 1 1
228 POMERADO RD & STONE CANYON RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
229 PAPAGO DR & SILVERLAKE DR 0 0 0 1 0 1
230 COMMUNITY RD & KIRKHAM WY 0 1 0 0 0 1
231 FAIRBURN ST & FLORAL AV 0 0 0 0 1 1
232 CARRIAGE HEIGHTS WY & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
233 MPM 16.50 & RT 67 0 0 0 0 1 1
234 OLD POMERADO RD & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
235 EDEN GROVE & ESPOLA RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
236 TWIN PEAKS RD & COMMUNITY RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
237 COMMUNITY RD & LITTLE DAWN LN 0 0 0 0 1 1
238 ASHGATE PL & FAIRGATE DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
239 POWAY RD & SUNRISE RANCH RD 0 1 0 0 0 1
240 LAKE POWAY RD & RIPARIAN RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
241 POWAY RD & WESTMARK WY 0 0 0 0 1 1
242 AGSTEN LN & MIDLAND RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
243 COMMUNITY RD & METATE RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
244 MEADOW GLEN & OAK KNOLL RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
245 GLENVILLE ST & STANDISH DR 0 0 1 0 0 1
246 ERIN LN & NEDDICK AV 0 0 0 0 1 1
247 MCFARON RD & POWERS CT 0 0 0 0 1 1
248 BEELER CANYON RD & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
249 TWIN PEAKS RD & WOODCREEK DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
250 DERRINGER RD & FIDDLETOWN RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
251 BOWDOIN RD & SEBAGO AV 0 0 0 0 1 1
252 HOSPITAL & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
62 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
253 MIDLAND RD & POINSETTIA DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
254 EASTVALE RD & MARKAR RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
255 AEDAN COURT & BETTY LEE WAY 0 0 1 0 0 1
256 N/B MIDLAND ROAD & POWAY ROAD E/B (13600 0 0 0 0 1 1 257 ACTON AV & SCARBORO ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
258 COMMUNITY RD & SCIPPS POWAY PARKWAY 0 0 0 0 1 1
259 CARRIAGE RD & PAPAGO DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
260 COMMUNITY RD & OLIVE MEADOWS DR 0 0 1 0 0 1
261 DOS HERMANOS RD & RT 67 0 1 0 0 0 1
262 MCKENZIE AV & SCOTS WY 0 0 0 0 1 1
263 FRANCINE TER & FRANCINE TER 12810 0 0 0 0 1 1
264 HALPER RD & HOLLAND RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
265 CARRIAGE HEIGHTS WY & CARRIAGE RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
266 MIDLAND RD & TEMPLE ST 0 0 1 0 0 1
267 SILVER LAKE DR & SILVER LAKE RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
268 BROMEGRASS CT & LAKE POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
269 COMMUNITY RD & DANIELSON 0 0 1 0 0 1
270 RANCHO BERNARDO RD & SUMMERFIELD LN 0 0 1 0 0 1
271 MIDLAND RD & SOMERSET RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
272 POMERADO RD & STONEMILL DR 1 0 0 0 0 1
273 SOPHIA DR & TARZANA RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
274 TIERRA BONITA & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
275 HILL N DALE WY & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
276 NONOKI DR & WAN ESTA DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
277 OLIVE MEADOWS DR & OLIVE MESA CT 0 0 0 1 0 1
278 POMERADO RD & POMERADO RD 11500 0 0 1 0 0 1
279 BOWRON RD & CREEKSIDE LN 0 0 0 0 1 1
280 GLEN OAKS DR & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
281 DANA VISTA ST. & ESTRELLA VISTA ST. 0 0 0 0 1 1
282 ARBOLITOS DR & BEECHWOOD DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
283 KIRKHAM WY & STOWE DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
284 ESPOLA RD & EZRA LN 0 0 0 0 0 0
285 AMBER HILL LN & CARRIAGE RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
286 TWIN TRAILS CT & TWIN TRAILS DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
287 CLOUDY MOON DR & RT 67 0 0 0 0 0 0
288 MINA DE ORO & RT 67 0 0 0 0 0 0
289 JACK RABBIT RD & ORCHARD BEND RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
290 CAMINO DEL NORTE & WORLD TRADE DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
291 ESPOLA RD & SUMMERFIELD RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
292 BOCA RATON LN & TAM O SHANTER DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
293 MILEPOST MILE POST 11 & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
294 KETRON AV & MCKENZIE AV 0 0 0 0 0 0
295 EASTERN ST & EDGEMORE ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
296 METATE LN & YUKON AV 0 0 0 0 0 0
297 HILLEARY PARK DR & HILLEARY PL 0 0 0 0 0 0
298 TWIN CIRCLES CT & TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
299 POWAY RD & SPRINGHURST DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
300 POMERADO RD & TWIN PEAKS 0 0 0 0 0 0
301 KIRKHAM RD & TECH CENTER DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
302 AVENIDA FLORENCIA & AVENI DA LA VALENCIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 303 BLUE CRYSTAL TR & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
63 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
304 POMERADO RD & SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 0 0 0 0 0
305 KIRKHAM RD & STOWE DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
306 MILEPOST 17.50 & RT 67 0 0 0 0 0 0
307 PALISADES DR & SILVERSET ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
308 POWAY RD & SILVERLAKE DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
309 ELMFIELD LN & SUMMERFIELD LN 0 0 0 0 0 0
310 MI LES POST CALLBOX 67-107 & RT 67 0 0 0 0 0 0
311 HOSP WY & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
312 MEADOWBROOK LN & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
313 DERRINGER RD & OLD STATION RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
314 CARRIAGE RD & NEMO ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
315 BROOKSTONE DR & SAGECREST DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
316 MINA DE ORO & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
317 CAYUGA DR & PEQUOT DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
318 SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY & SYCAMORE CANYON RC 0 0 0 0 0 0 319 PASEO COLINA & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
320 GENERAL ATOMICS WAY & SCIPPS POWAY PARK\/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 LOLA WAY & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
322 ESPOLA RD & RANGE PARK RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
323 LUCIDI FARMS WY & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
324 BOUNTY WY & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
325 SILVER HEIGHTS RD & SILVER HEIGHTS RD 14420 0 0 0 0 0 0 326 POMERADO RD & ROBERTO WY 0 0 0 0 0 0
327 KENNEBUNK ST & NEDDICK AV 0 0 0 0 0 0
328 RAPTOR RD & SYCAMORE CAYONH RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
329 KNOLL RD & POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
330 ESPOLA RD & JEROME DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
331 OAK KNOLL DR & POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
332 FALLEN TREE RD & STONE CANYON RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
333 CALL BOX 67 161 & RT 67 0 0 0 0 0 0
334 POMERADO RD & SCIPPS POWAY PARKWAY 0 0 0 0 0 0
335 CALLE COLINA (13300 BLOCK) & ESPOLA ROAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 336 BOCA RATON LANE & TAM O SHANTER DRIVE E/B 0 0 0 0 0 0 337 FALLEN LEAF RD & STONE CANYON RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
338 OLD COACH DR & OLD COACH RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
339 TARASCAN DR & WAN ESTA DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
340 POMERADO RD & STONEMILL RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
341 MORENE ST & STACK ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
342 MOUNTAIN DR & RT 67 0 0 0 0 0 0
343 BUTTERFIELD TRL & OLD COACH RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
64 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
APPENDIX
APPENDIX B - Mid-Block Collisions
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
November 15, 2022, Item #4
Severe Other Complaint of Total
Primary Road Fatal Injury Injury Pain PDO Collisions
POWAY RD 0 7 15 29 45 96
SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 2 0 4 10 16 32
TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 2 6 14 22
ESPOLA RD 0 2 2 3 14 21
COMMUNITY RD 1 1 4 5 9 20
POMERADO RD 0 0 1 6 6 13
OAK KNOLL RD 0 0 0 2 8 10
KIRKHAM WY 0 0 1 2 2 5
TED WILLIAMS PKWY 0 0 1 0 3 4
STOWE DR 0 0 0 2 2 4
OLD POMERADO RD 0 0 0 0 2 2
DANIELSON ST 0 0 0 0 2 2
CARRIAGE RD 0 0 0 1 1 2
NEDDICKAV 0 0 2 0 0 2
SILVER LAKE DR 0 0 0 0 2 2
CAMINO DEL NORTE 0 0 0 0 2 2
TWIN PEAKS 0 1 0 0 1 2
METATE LN 0 0 0 0 2 2
RIDGEDALE DR 0 0 0 0 2 2
SCIPPS POWAY PARKWAY 0 0 0 1 1 2
STONE CANYON RD 0 0 1 0 1 2
OLD COACH RD 0 0 1 0 1 2
ARBOLITOS DR 0 0 1 0 0 1
MIDLAND RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
FRAME RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
TWIN TRAILS DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
KIRKHAM RD 0 0 0 1 0 1
HIGH VALLEY RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
PEQUOT DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
DANIELSON CT 0 0 1 0 0 1
JACK RABBIT RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
TAM O SHANTER DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
MCKENZIE AV 0 0 0 0 1 1
ROBISON BL 0 0 0 0 1 1
EDGEMORE ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
HILLEARY PARK DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
AVENIDA LA VALENCIA 0 0 0 0 1 1
CREEK RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
QUIET HILLS DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
SCRIPPS POWAY PKWY 0 0 0 1 0 1
HILLEARY PL 0 0 0 1 0 1
PALISADES DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
66 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
ELMFIELD LN 0 0 1 0 0 1
GREGG ST 0 0 1 0 0 1
MARTINCOIT RD 0 0 1 0 0 1
DERRINGER RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
SAGECREST DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
OAK KNOLL DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
SILVERSET ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
SILVER HEIGHTS RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
SYCAMORE CAYONH RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
AVENIDA FLORENCIA 0 0 1 0 0 1
CALLE COLINA (13300 BLOCK) 0 0 0 0 1 1
TAM O SHANTER DRIVE E/B (1731 0 0 0 0 1 1
LAKE POWAY RD 0 0 0 0 1 1
WANESTA DR 0 0 0 0 1 1
STACK ST 0 0 0 0 1 1
CASA AVENIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0
CLAIRE DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
NORWALK ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOBIASSON RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
EDGEMOOR ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
TECH CENTER DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
WHITEWATER DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
HIDDEN VALLEY DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
COMUNA DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
HIGH PINE ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRAILWIND RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRIUMPH DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
ACTON AV 0 0 0 0 0 0
MCFERON RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
AUBREY ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
FAIRGATE DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
CICERO CT 0 0 0 0 0 0
LOS OLIVOS AV 0 0 0 0 0 0
DEERWOOD ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
BIRCH BROOK CT 0 0 0 0 0 0
TITAN WY 0 0 0 0 0 0
SILVERLAKE DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
DEL NORTE 0 0 0 0 0 0
BUCKLEY ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
JOYAS CT 0 0 0 0 0 0
CREE RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
SAINT ANDREWS DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
GARDEN RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
AMSO ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
SELSEY ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
67 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
VIA LA GITANO 0 0 0 0 0 0
POWAY MESA DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
IPAVA DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
CREE DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
ADAH LN 0 0 0 0 0 0
BOWRON RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
SOLERA WY 0 0 0 0 0 0
OLIVE MEADOWS DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
HILLNDALE WY 0 0 0 0 0 0
POWERS RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
BERLIN ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
GLENOAK RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
BUCKSKIN TRL 0 0 0 0 0 0
GENERAL ATOMICS WY 0 0 0 0 0 0
SPRINGVALE ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
BOULDER VIEW DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
CIVIC CENTER DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
HOLLAND RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROBERTO RIO RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
HESTA ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
13122 COYOTERO DR. 0 0 0 0 0 0
PAPAGO DR 0 0 0 0 0 0
FAIRBURN ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
LOS NIETOS AV 0 0 0 0 0 0
EDEN GROVE 0 0 0 0 0 0
TWIN PEAKS RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
RIPARIAN RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
MORNING AIR RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
GLENVILLE ST 0 0 0 0 0 0
ERIN LN 0 0 0 0 0 0
MCFARON RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
BEELER CANYON RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
FIDDLETOWN RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
BOWDOIN RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
MARKAR RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
AEDAN COURT 0 0 0 0 0 0
POWAY ROAD E/B (13600 BLOCK) 0 0 0 0 0 0
SCOTS WY 0 0 0 0 0 0
FRANCINE TER 0 0 0 0 0 0
HALPER RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
SILVER LAKE RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
RANCHO BERNARDO RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
SOMERSET RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
TARZANA RD 0 0 0 0 0 0
GREGG CT 0 0 0 0 0 0
68 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
APPENDIX
APPENDIX C - Caltrans Countermeasure List
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
November 15, 2022, Item #4
-..J
0 0 ....
-..J w
Table 1. Countermeasures for Signalized Intersections
No. Type Countermeasure Name Crash Type
501 Lighting Add intersection lighting (S.1.) Night
502 Signal Mod. Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, All mounting, size, and number 503 Signal Mod. Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) All 504 Signal Mod. Provide Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection for high speed approaches All sos Signal Mod. Install emergency vehicle pre-emption systems Emergency Vehicle
506 Signal Mod. Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signal has no left-turn lane or All phase before) 507 Signal Mod. Provide protected left turn phase (left turn lane already exists) All 508 Signal Mod. Convert signal to mast arm (from pedestal-mounted) All 509 Operation/ Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through Intersection) All Warning 510 Operation/ Install flashing beacons as advance warning (S.1.) All Warning 511 Operation/ Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) All Warning 512 Geometric Mod. Install raised median on approaches (S.1.) All S13PB Geometric Mod. Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches P&B 514 Geometric Mod . Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and All u-turns (S.1.) 515 Geometric Mod. Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections (S.1.) All 516 Geometric Mod. Convert intersection to roundabout (from signal) All S17PB Ped and Bike Install pedestrian countdown signal heads P&B S18PB Ped and Bike Install pedestrian crossing (S.1.) P&B S19PB Ped and Bike Pedestrian Scramble P&B
S20PB Ped and Bike Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) P&B S21PB Ped and Bike Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) P&B 4/20/2020 Local Roadway Safety- (Version 1.5)
Expected HSIP Systemic
CRF Life Funding Approach
(Years) Eligibility Opportunity?
40% 20 100% Medium
15% 10 100% Very High
15% 10 50% Very High
40% 10 100% High
70% 10 100% High
55% 20 90% Low
30% 20 100% High
30% 20 100% Medium
10% 10 100% Very High
30% 10 100% Medium
55% 10 100% Medium
25% 20 90% Medium
35% 20 90% Low
50% 20 90% Medium
50% 20 90% Medium
Varies 20 100% Low
25% 20 100% Very High
25% 20 100% High
40% 20 100% High
15% 10 100% Very High
60% 10 100% Very High
P age I 31
November 15, 2022, Item #4
"""" .....
0 .....
"""" w
Table 3. Countermeasures for Roadways
No. Type Countermeasure Name
R0l Lighting Add segment lighting
R02 Remove/ Shield Obstacles Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of Clear Recovery Zone R03 Remove/ Shield Obstacles Install Median Barrier
R04 Remove/ Shield Obstacles Install Guardrail
ROS Remove/ Shield Obstacles Install impact attenuators R06 Remove/ Shield Obstacles Flatten side slopes
R07 Remove/ Shield Obstacles Flatten side slopes and remove guardrail ROB Geometric Mod. Install raised median
R09 Geometric Mod. Install median (flush)
RlOPB Geometric Mod. Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches Rll Geometric Mod. Install acceleration/ deceleration lanes R12 Geometric Mod . Widen lane (initially less than 10 ft) R13 Geometric Mod . Add two-way left-turn lane (without reducing travel lanes) R14 Geometric Mod. Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4 to 3 and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes)
RlS Geometric Mod. Widen shoulder
R16 Geometric Mod. Curve Shoulder widening (Outside Only) R17 Geometric Mod. Improve horizontal alignment (flatten curves) R18 Geometric Mod. Flatten crest vertical curve
R19 Geometric Mod. Improve curve superelevation
R20 Geometric Mod. Convert from two-way to one-way traffic R21 Geometric Mod. Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) 4/20/2020 Local Roadway Safety- (Version 1.5)
Expected HSIP Systemic Crash CRF Life Funding Approach Type (Years) Eligibility Opportunity? Night 35% 20 100% Medium
All 35% 20 90% High
All 25% 20 100% Medium
All 25% 20 100% High
All 25% 10 100% High
All 30% 20 90% Medium
All 40% 20 90% Medium
All 25% 20 90% Medium
All 15% 20 90% Medium
P&B 35% 20 90% Low
All 25% 20 90% Low
All 25% 20 90% Medium
All 30% 20 90% Medium
All 30% 20 90% Med ium
All 30% 20 90% Medium
All 45% 20 90% Medium
All 50% 20 90% Low
All 25% 20 90% Low
All 45% 20 90% Medium
All 35% 20 90% Medium
All 55% 10 100% High
P age I 33
November 15, 2022, Item #4
APPENDIX
APPENDIX D - Cost Estimates
CITY OF POWAY I LRSP
November 15, 2022, Item #4
Countermeasure Cost Estimate
Average 30% 20%
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Admin/Engr
Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Contingency Project Total Average 30% 20%
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Admin/Engr
Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Contingency Project Total $ ' $ $ ' $ $ ' $
~U7o
Average 30% Admin/Engr
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Contingency+ #3 Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Mobilization Project Total $ ' $ ' $ ' $ ' $ ' $ , 00
Average 30% 20%
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Admin/Engr
A Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Contingency Project Total Average 30% Admrn/Engr
Price Per Const. Construction Construction and
B Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Mobilization Project Total p $ '
Average 30% 20%
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Admin/Engr
B Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Mobilization Project Total p g $ '
Average 30% 20%
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Admin/Engr
C Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Contingency Project Total Average 30% 20%
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Admin/Engr
#2 Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Contingency Project Total Bulbout 2 75,000 150,000 45,000 195,000 39,000 $234,000 Crosswalk 7 1,500 10,500 3,150 13,650 2,730 $16,380
Signs 22 1,500 33,000 9,900 42,900 8,580 $51,480
Total 50,310 $301,860
Average 30% 20%
Price Per Const. Construction Construction Admin/Engr
Item Quantity Unit Cost Contingency Total Contingency Project Total $ '
73 of 73
November 15, 2022, Item #4
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA REPORT CityofPoway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jeff Chumbley, Fire Chief ~
Susy Turnbull, Sr. Management Analyst
858-668-4474 or [email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
A Resolution authorizing the acceptance of the 2021 Urban Area Security Initiative Grant Program Funds and appropriation of funds The Department of Homeland Security provides funds through the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant Program to cities to build and sustain emergency response capabilities. The grant is administered regionally by the San Diego Office of Emergency Services. Funds for training are allocated to each jurisdiction based on population. Poway's allocation for Grant Fiscal Year 2021 is $5,046.
The grant requirements specify the City Council must adopt a resolution authorizing participation in this program.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing staff to accept funds through the Urban Area Security Initiative Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021 and the appropriation of funds.
Discussion:
The Department of Homeland Security provides funds through UASI Grant Program to states and local agencies to build and sustain trained members of our Fire Department. The funds help advance the program's goals and objectives.
The County of San Diego applies for, receives and administers federal grant funds associated with the program. The County's Unified Disaster Council, of which Poway is a member, is the governing body that determines the local grant fund distribution formula, which is based on each jurisdiction's population.
The City is committed to offering training to our Fire Department personnel for career development 1 of 3
November 15, 2022, Item #5
and sustainability in our succession plan. This program offers free training to increase the capability of our workforce. After individuals take recommended classroom training, cities are reimbursed by the County for the full amount of overtime and backfill while the individuals are in training.
The County has allocated $5,046 to the City of Poway for staff overtime and backfill to cover the cost of staff during these trainings.
Environmental Review:
This item is not subject to CEQA review.
Fiscal Impact:
Matching funds are not required for the UASI Grant Program and all grant related expenditures are reimbursable. Upon award of the grant, an appropriation of $5,046 from the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance will be made to the Fiscal Year 2021 UASI Grant Program Budget. It is anticipated that all expenditures and reimbursements will be completed by December 31, 2023.
Public Notification:
None
Attachments:
A. Resolution
Reviewed/Approved By:
Assistant City Manager
2 of3
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #5
RESOLUTION NO. 22-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF
GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE URBAN AREA SECURITY
INITIATIVE GRANT PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATION OF
FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Poway is eligible to receive federal grant funds through the 2021 State Homeland Security Grant Program for emergency preparedness; WHEREAS, the approved grant allocation for the City of Poway is $5,046; WHEREAS, the federal grant funds for the Urban Area Security Initiative Grant Program require no City matching funds, all grant-related expenditures are one-hundred percent reimbursable, and the City shall incur no direct costs; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Poway to participate in this program to enhance education and emergency preparedness.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows:
SECTION 1: The following staff are hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the City of Poway, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance provided by the Federal Department of Homeland Security and sub-granted through the State of California; Jeff Chumbley, Fire Chief, OR
Susy Turnbull, Sr. Management Analyst
SECTION 2: That the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate $5,046 from General Fund unassigned fund balance to the Fiscal Year 2021 UASI Grant Program.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 15th day of November, 2022 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
ATTEST:
Carrie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
3 of 3
Steve Vaus, Mayor
ATTACHMENT A
November 15, 2022, Item #5
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA REPORT CityofPoway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jeff Chumbley, Fire Chief r
Susy Turnbull, Sr. Management Analyst
858-668-4474 or [email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
Resolution authorizing participation and acceptance of funds through the 2021 State Homeland Security Grant Program
The Department of Homeland Security provides funds through the State Homeland Security Grant Program to cities to build and sustain emergency response capabilities. The grant is administered regionally by the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services. Funds for qualifying purchases are allocated to each jurisdiction based on population. Poway's allocation for Grant Fiscal Year 2021 is $30,823.
The grant requirements specify the City Council must adopt a resolution authorizing participation in this program.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing staff to accept funds through the 2021 State Homeland Security Grant Program.
Discussion:
The Department of Homeland Security provides funds through the State Homeland Security Grant Program to states and local agencies to build, sustain and deliver emergency response capabilities.
The funds help advance the program's goals and objectives.
The County of San Diego applies for, receives and administers federal grant funds associated with the program. The County's Unified Disaster Council, of which Poway is a member, is the governing body that determines the local grant fund distribution formula, which is based on each jurisdiction's population. After making qualified purchases, cities are reimbursed by the County for the full purchase amount.
One of the program's goals is to strengthen communication capabilities with an objective to 1 of 3
November 15, 2022, Item #6
implement a statewide interoperability plan. To advance this goal, the City plans to use the allocated $30,823 in grant funds to purchase the replacement of 800-Megahertz radios.
The County of San Diego administers an 800-Megahertz Radio Communication System. In 1998, the City of Poway joined the County's system, providing the City with interoperability capabilities - that is, the ability to talk to other agencies using hand held radios. Equipment purchased with this funding will meet the communications needs of the current and new communication system.
The City is currently in the third and final year of upgrading all of the 800-Megahertz radios as part of the phase in of the Next Generation Regional Communications System Radio (RCS) upgrade. In 2013, the City of Poway executed an agreement to participate in the upgrade of the existing RCS infrastructure and a corresponding upgrade to the radios.
Environmental Review:
This item is not subject to CEQA for review.
Fiscal Impact:
The City currently budgets for the replacement of its 800-Megahertz radios. The State Homeland Security Grant does not require matching funds and helps offset the City's replacement costs for these radios. Upon completion of the grant-related expenditures in the amount of $30,823, the General Fund will be reimbursed through the grant funding. The reimbursed funds will result in a reduction of expenses dedicated for the replacement of 800-Megahertz radios. It is anticipated that all expenditures and reimbursements will be completed by May 31, 2023.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Resolution
Reviewed/Approved By:
Assistant City Manager
2 of 3
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
Ch~
City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #6
RESOLUTION NO. 22-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION AND
THE ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS THROUGH THE 2021 STATE
HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Poway is eligible to receive federal grant funds through the 2021 State Homeland Security Grant Program for emergency preparedness; WHEREAS, the approved grant allocation for the City of Poway is $30,823 WHEREAS, the federal grant funds for the State Homeland Security Grant Program require no City matching funds, all grant-related expenditures are one-hundred percent reimbursable, and the City shall incur no direct costs; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Poway to participate in this program to enhance emergency preparedness.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows:
SECTION 1: The following staff are hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the City of Poway, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance provided by the federal Department of Homeland Security and sub-granted through the State of California.
Jeff Chumbley, Fire Chief OR
Susy Turnbull, Sr. Management Analyst
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 15th day of November, 2022 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
Steve Vaus, Mayor
ATTEST:
Carrie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A
November 15, 2022, Item #6
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA REPORT CityofPoway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Eric Heidemann, Director of Public Works {W'
CITY COUNCIL
Will Wiley, Assistant Director of Public Works for Maintenance Operations .:,::.. (858) 668-4705 or [email protected]
Acceptance of Hazardous Storage Units Removal and Replacement Project; Bid No. 22-002 with Fleming Environmental Inc., as Complete On March 15, 2022, the City Council awarded the contract for the Hazardous Storage Units Removal and Replacement Project, Bid No. 22-002, to Fleming Environmental Inc. in the amount of $396,674.00.
This action will accept the project as complete .
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council:
(1) Accept the Hazardous Storage Units Removal and Replacement Project as complete; (2) Authorize the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion; (3) Authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $19,940.86, if unencumbered, 45-days after the City Council's acceptance;
(4) Release the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Bond for Material and Labor in the amount of $396,674.00 after the release of retention; and
(5) Retain the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Bond for Faithful Performance for a period of one (1) year.
Discussion:
On March 15, 2022, City Council awarded the contract for the Hazardous Storage Units Removal and I
Replacement Project, in the amount of $396,674.00 to Fleming Environmental Inc. This project included the removal, disposal, and replacement of three (3) hazardous waste storage units located at the City of Poway Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Facility at 12325 Crosthwaite Circle and one (1) hazardous waste storage unit at the City of Poway Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Facility located at 14415 Lake Poway Road.
One (1) change order in the amount of $2,143.22 was processed for this project. The change order included extra cost for unforeseen permit fees. The installation of new anchor bolts for each unit 1 of 2
November 15, 2022, Item #7
triggered the building permit requirement for each project site. The final contract amount is $398,817.22 .
Staff finds the project to be complete in accordance with the standards and specifications of the contract.
Environmental Review:
This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Fiscal Impact:
Sufficient funds are available in the Hazardous Storage Units Replacement Project Account (MN032) for the release of retention in the amount of $19,940.86.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
None.
Reviewed/Approved By:
Wend Kaserman
Assistant City Manager
2 of 2
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
Ch~
City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #7
AGENDA REPORT CityofPoway
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Robert Manis, Director of Development Services /M,
Jeff Beers, Special Projects Engineer ~
(858) 668-4624 or [email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Fire Station 3 HVAC Controls Replacement Project; with Sunbelt Controls, Inc., as Complete
Summary:
On April 5, 2022, the City Council awarded the contract for the Fire Station 3 HVAC Controls Replacement project; to Sunbelt Controls, Inc. in the amount of $105,000.00. This action will accept the project as complete .
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council:
(1) Accept the Fire Station 3 HVAC Controls Replacement project as complete; (2) Authorize the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion; Discussion:
This heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) project involved the replacement of the computer and software that run the system. All the wiring from the computer to the actuators and control devices that are spread throughout the buildings were also replaced. There were no change orders. The final contract amount remains $105,000.00.
This action accepts the Fire Station 3 HVAC Controls Replacement project as complete.
Environmental Review:
The matter of acceptance of public improvements that have been completed, which were the subject of a prior environmental determination, is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act.
Fiscal Impact:
None.
1 of 2
November 15, 2022, Item #8
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
None.
Reviewed/Approved By:
Wen Kaserman
Assistant City Manager
2 of2
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #8
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AG EN DA REPORT City of Poway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Counc} ,A
Robert Manis, Director of Development Services ,"''
Sara Trunzo, Associate Civil Engineert?'i
(858) 668-4652/[email protected] ';:7\
CITY COUNCIL
Approval of Final Map for Tentative Tract Map 20-003 (Fairfield Subdivision); (APNs: 317-490-55 & 317-490-69)
The Tract Map for the Fairfield Subdivision, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 20-003, is ready for approval.
This map merges two developed contiguous parcels into one approximately 7-acre parcel. The subdivision is located on the south side of Poway Road between Carriage Road and Carriage Heights Way. The Location Map is attached hereto as Attachment A.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council approve the Tract Map for TTM 20-003 and direct its recordation.
Discussion:
TTM20-003 was approved by the City Council on December 1, 2020, pursuant to Resolution No. 20- 091 (Attachment B). The Tract Map, as shown in Attachment C, is found to be in substantial conformance (per the Subdivision Map Act) with the approved TTM. All the conditions of approval required prior to recordation of the final map have been addressed. Since approval of the TTM in 2020, no changes have been made. Pursuant to state law, this action will only approve the final map.
Environmental Review:
On December 1, 2020, it was determined by the City Council that TTM 20-003 is consistent with the Poway Road Specific Plan (PRSP) and conforms with the requirements, development standards and guidelines therein, and, therefore, as set forth in Section 8.2. of the PRSP, no further environmental analysis was required because all of the project's impacts were analyzed in and are fully covered by the previously certified Environmental Impact Review (EIR) for the PRSP. The approval of the Final Map for TTM 20-003 is within the scope of the previous determination; therefore, no further environmental review is necessary. A Notice of Determination was filed on December 2, 2020. 1 of 41
November 15, 2022, Item #9
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Location Map
B. Resolution No. 20-091
C. Tract Map
Reviewed/Approved By:
W~Kaserman
Assistant City Manager
2 of 41
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
Chr s Ha ine
City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #9
Subject Parcels
/ APN 317-490-55
& 317-490-69 -- r,=,c•·ou.-.i...=c---Vl7'7?",.~/
/4
0 120 240 480
~~--~-§-~~~' Feet
3 of 41
CITY OF POWAY
Location Map
Fairfield (TTM 20-003)
ATTACHMENT A
November 15, 2022, Item #9
RESOLUTION NO. 20-091
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
20-003 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 20-002 FOR A MIXED
USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WITHIN THE POWAY ROAD
SPECIFIC PLAN, TOWN CENTER DISTRICT. ASSESSOR
PARCEL NUMBERS: 317-490-55 and 317-490-69
WHEREAS, on December 1, 2020 the City Council considered Tentative Tract Map {TTM) 20-003 and Development Review (DR) 20-002; a proposed mixed-use development project including the construction of 212 residential units, 11,364 square feet (sf) of commercial space, and approximately 9,955 sf of quasi-public open space that is privately owned and publicly accessible on the south side of Poway Road, west of Civic Center Drive and east of Carriage Road within the Town Center (TC) District of the Poway Road Specific Plan (PRSP) with related site and public street improvements (project hereinafter); WHEREAS, on December 1, 2020, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to receive testimony from the public, both for and against, relative to this matter; WHEREAS , the City Council has read and considered the agenda report for the proposed project, including the attachments, and has considered all other evidence presented at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the approved development plans are incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit A to this Resolution available on file in the Development Services Department, including the site and landscape plans and the architectural and civil drawings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in conjunction with the PRSP, and was certified by the City Council on December 5, 2017 (PRSP EIR). The PRSP EIR analyzed the potential impacts of the proposed build out of the PRSP area in the manner permitted by the Specific Plan.
The City Council finds, in its independent judgement, that this project is consistent with the PRSP and conforms with the requirements, development standards and guidelines therein, and, therefore, as set forth in Section 8.2 of the PRSP, no further environmental analysis is required because all of the project's impacts have already been analyzed in, and are fully covered by the previously certified EIR. The City Council further finds, in its independent judgement, that the project does not result in any significant changes that would allow subsequent or supplemental environmental review pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163. A Notice of Determination shall be filed upon approval. These findings are based on substantial evidence in the administrative record of proceedings, which includes but is not limited to the following:
A. The PRSP EIR, appendices, documents incorporated by reference therein, transcripts of public meetings, and other related documents.
4 of 41 ATTACHMENT B
November 15, 2022, Item #9
Resolution No. 20-091
B. The June 9, 2020 access analysis prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan for the project, shows that it will result in 1,998 average daily trips (ADTs), 152 a.m. peak hour trips, and 174 p.m. peak hour trips, which is consistent with the traffic levels that the PRSP EIR assumed would be generated by the development of the Project site pursuant to the PRSP.
C. The July 11, 2019, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared by Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC for the project, revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the site.
D. The July 2020 Historical Resource Evaluation Report prepared by LSA prepared for the project, found that all existing buildings on the project's site are ineligible for designation as a historic resource per local, state and national criteria.
SECTION 3: The City Council finds that the proposed project is consistent with the PRSP generally, including the TC District designation, and further, the proposed project qualifies for Tier 2 height and density bonuses (Table 3-4) because the project includes lot consolidation as that term is used in the PRSP. Therefore, the City Council finds that the proposed project will result in the following :
A. Creation of a distinct and vibrant Town Center with a mix of commercial and residential uses.
B. Redevelopment of an infill site that will create a mix of compatible and complementary uses.
C. Development of residential units that are located in proximity to civic, retail and commercial service
D. Provision of appropriate community benefits identified in the PRSP:
1. Creation of a total of 9,955 sf quasi-public open space that will be a vital community resource that provides a place to sit and relax, gather, and enhance pedestrian activity, and host community events.
2. Creation of a neighborhood restaurant row that consists of two restaurants that will have a combined seating for at least 80 patrons. The neighborhood restaurant row will contribute to economic vitality and provide ground floor space permanently reserved for neighborhood restaurants/cafes within the TC District.
3. A contribution of $500 per dwelling unit ($106,000 based on 212 dwelling units) to a Community Benefit Fund that will be established to implement the PRSP. The fund may be used for significant streetscape and mobility improvements including, but not limited to streetscape improvements include lane restriping, median and sidewalk enhancements, additional traffic signal and pedestrian crossings on Poway Road, undergrounding utilities, and parklets, among other improvements.
E. Development of residential units that are located in proximity to civic, retail and commercial service uses.
F. The project provides exemplary design and directly implements objectives of the PRSP. s of 41
November 15, 2022, Item #9
Resolution No. 20-091
G. The project provides transportation demand measures that reduce vehicle trips including:
a) provides opportunities to live, work and play within the immediate vicinity, b) provides access to adjacent bus-stops with new shelter improvements, c) provides pedestrian connectivity to surrounding land uses, d) creates a neighborhood park and commercial mixed use opportunities, and e) provides public and private bicycle racks.
SECTION 4: The findings, in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66410 et. seq.) for TTM20-003, are made as follows:
A. The TTM is consistent with the General Plan, in that it proposes to create residential and commercial units at a density consistent with the General Plan, Poway Municipal Code (PMC), and PRSP.
B. The design and improvements required of the TTM are consistent with the General Plan and PRSP, in that the approved density and lot size and configuration adheres to the standards of the General Plan and PRSP.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development and the density proposed, in that the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed density.
D. The design of the TTM is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, in that the proposed project will be developed in accordance with City and other governmental agency requirements and mitigation measures will be incorporated pursuant to the PRSP EIR and the proposed project is within a previously disturbed property that was developed with a shopping center and bowling alley building.
E. The approval of the TTM is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that City water and sewer service will be provided to the project.
F. The design of the TTM will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now on record, for access through or use of the property within the subdivision in that the ultimate development of the site with residences can be accommodated without obstructing or otherwise impacting existing easements, except that an access easement is being relocated. All other public easements are currently not being utilized by the and are proposed to be quitclaimed.
SECTION 5: The findings for DR20-002, in accordance with the PMC 17.52.010 Purpose of DR, are made as follows:
A. The project has been designed to be architecturally compatible with surrounding development and conforms to the PRSP development standards and design guidelines.
There are five buildings that are each designed with matching exteriors that are consistent with the other projects in the vicinity on Poway Road. The stucco exteriors, wood trim, and accents will feature earth tone colors which is consistent with the Poway General Plan and the PRSP. Therefore, the project respects and recognizes the interdependence of land values and aesthetics to the benefit of the City.
B. The project has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding development by utilizing a compatible architectural design consistent with the PRSP. The buildings were designed to complement other building in the TC district. Therefore, the proposed 6 of 41
November 15, 2022, Item #9
Resolution No. 20-091
development respects the public concerns for the aesthetics of development, and encourages the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property within the City.
C. The granting of the DR would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare within the community since the proposed development will complete improvements necessary for the mixed-use development.
D. The design and improvements of the proposed development are consistent with all elements of the Poway General Plan and the PRSP.
E. In accordance with Table 3-4 of the PRSP, the project includes a Tier 2 Height and Density Bonus with the Selection of the following Community Benefits: Public Open Space, a Neighborhood Restaurant Row, and a Contribution to the Community Benefits Fund.
These bonuses are granted as a part of the project approval.
SECTION 6: The findings, in accordance with Government Code Section 66020 for the public improvements needed as a result of the proposed development to protect the public health, safety and welfare, are made as follows:
A. The design and improvements of the proposed development are consistent with all elements of the Poway General Plan, as well as City Ordinances, because all necessary facilities will be available to serve this project.
B. The construction of public improvements is needed as a result of the proposed development to protect the public health, safety and welfare as further described in the conditions of approval.
C. In accordance with the Poway General Plan, the project requires the payment of development impact fees, which are assessed on a pro-rata basis to finance public infrastructure improvements, which promote . a safe and healthy environment for the residents of the City.
SECTION 7: The City Council hereby approves TTM20-003 and DR20-002, as shown on the approved plans incorporated by reference and stamped as "Exhibit A" dated December 1, 2020 (Exhibit A hereinafter) on file with the City, except as noted herein and subject to the following conditions:
A. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, collectively the "Claims" against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of any aspect of the project approval set for in this resolution, including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval (including but not limited to TTM20-003 and/or DR20-002) and any environmental document or decision made pursuant to CEQA. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation-related decisions, including, 7 of 41
November 15, 2022, Item #9
Resolution No. 20-091
but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by applicant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no indemnity shall be required for claims resulting from the exclusive gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City.
B. This approval is based on the existing site conditions and proposed project details represented on the approved plans stamped "Exhibit A" and on file at the Development Services Department. If actual conditions and details vary from representations on Exhibit A, the approved plans must be changed to reflect the existing site conditions and proposed project details. Any substantial changes to the approved plans must be approved by the Director of Development Services and may require approval of the City Council if the Director of Development Services finds that the proposed changes do not substantially conform to approved plans.
C. The developer is required to comply with the Poway Noise Ordinance (Chapter 8.08 PMC) requirements that govern construction activity and noise levels.
D. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant shall (1) submit in writing that all conditions of approval have been read and understood; and (2) the property owner shall execute a Covenant Regarding Real Property notarizing and recording said document. In order for the City to prepare the Covenant the applicant must first submit a legal description of the subject site.
E. The proposed project shall comply with all mitigation measures established under the certified FEIR for the PRSP as specified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP).
F. The conditions for the project shall remain in effect for the life of the subject property, and shall run with the land and be binding upon future owners, successors, heirs, and transferees of the current property owner.
G. Prior to Final Map approval, unless other timing is indicated, the following conditions shall be complied with:
8 of 41
(Engineering)
1. Within thirty (30) days after tentative map approval, the applicant shall submit in writing to the City's Planning Division that all conditions of approval have been read and understood.
2. This approval is based on the existing site conditions represented on the approved tentative map. If actual conditions vary from representations, the approved tentative map must be changed to reflect the actual conditions. Any substantial changes to the tentative map must be approved by the Director of Development Services and may require approval of the City Council.
3. The final map, together with the supporting data and documentation, shall be submitted to Engineering Division for review and approval. The appropriate map checking fee shall be paid by the applicant.
4. The final map shall conform to City standards and procedures, the City Subdivision November 15, 2022, Item #9
9 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
Ordinance, the latest edition of the Subdivision Map Act, and the Land Surveyors' Act, and all other applicable laws, regulations and ordinances.
5. An easement for public access for a future road (internal street) as shown on the tentative map shall be dedicated on the final map.
6. A covenant shall be notarized and recorded to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services regarding the requirement for the Town Center internal street and the design of the internal street connection at the eastern and western boundaries of the site. The covenant shall include that this connection shall be redesigned in order to accommodate an internal street in compliance with Chapter
5.10 of the Poway Road Specific Plan. The covenant shall also include that this connection of the internal street will result in a loss of parking spaces.
7. Existing easements that are no longer required by the City shall be vacated on the final map.
8. Easements will be required for all public facilities and access onsite. This may include, but is not limited to, utilities, streets, sidewalks, and elevators.
9. Applicant shall enter into a Private Road Maintenance Agreement for the private roads within the subdivision. The form and content shall be in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney.
10. If there is an instrument for Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R), which addresses construction and maintenance of the private road, slopes, utilities, drainage, or accesses in the subdivision, said CC&R shall be reviewed by the City prior to recordation.
11. A mylar copy of the Final Tract map shall be provided to the City within three months of its recordation or prior to building permit issuance, whichever comes first. A cash deposit to the City, in an amount equivalent to $100.00 per sheet of the Tract Map, for the mylar reproduction of the recorded Tract Map shall be posted.
12. Within thirty days after City Council approval of the Final Tract Map, the subdivider shall pay the City the sewer connection fee.
13. The applicant shall pay the drainage impact development fee in effect at the time of subdivision.
14. Improvement plans prepared on a City of Poway standard sheet at a scale of 1" = 20', unless otherwise approved by the City's project engineer, in accordance with the submittal and content requirements listed in the PMC shall be approved.
Submittal shall be made to the Department of Development Services Engineering Division for review and approval. The improvement design shall be 100 percent complete at the time of submittal and ready for approval. The tentative map does not include all of the required public improvements. The improvement plan shall include, at a minimum, the following features:
a. The proposed traffic signal at Carriage Heights Way and Poway Road. The November 15, 2022, Item #9
10 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
traffic signal shall be compatible with and capable of handling adaptive signal facilities (to be installed in the future). The existing medians in Poway Road shall be modified as necessary to provide proper queuing for left turn lanes on Poway Road at the signalized intersection. The median opening at the existing driveway entrance on the west side of the project shall be removed and replaced with raised, landscaped median.
b. Public water improvements as shown on the approved tentative map. c. Public sewer improvements as required by the approved sewer study. Prior to the first submittal of the improvement plans, the applicant will be required to field-verify the existing sewer system (material, size, and slopes of the laterals and downstream mains) that the project is proposing to connect to so that the City can evaluate the required sewer improvements. The sewer study shall be updated to include the field findings and it shall be resubmitted with the first improvement plan submittal. The City will evaluate the sewer improvement requirements based on the updated sewer study and field findings. d. Proposed street lights along the streets fronting the project parcels. The location and type of street light shall be coordinated and approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
e. A City standard bus shelter with seating and trash receptacle at the location determined by the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and the City. An accessible slated bench with non-sleep bars and a trash receptacle per EDCO standards will be required. A turn-out is not required, however, this requires a concrete sidewalk pad adjacent to the curb (no landscaping between) that measures a minimum eight to ten feet deep and 25 feet long, with a maximum two percent slope from curb to back of sidewalk. Ensure that the path of travel between the bus stop and the intersection (and crossing) is accessible (ADA compliant). Submit improvement plan to MTS for review and approval of proposed bus stop improvements.
f. Additional public improvements along street frontage adjoining project parcels and adjacent to the proposed signal location may also include but are not limited to: driveway improvements, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility improvements, traffic improvements, street/bike lane/crosswalk striping, enhanced crosswalk paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, utilities, street trees and landscaping.
15. The project requirements for fire protection specify the installation of fire hydrants and expansion of the water system necessary to support the installation of the hydrants. A Water System Analysis may be required for final design of the proposed water system expansion. Applicant shall pay for the cost of preparing the analysis prior to submittal of improvement plans.
16. The public improvement plan shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Upon approval of the improvement plan, the applicant shall enter into a Standard Agreement for public improvements for the work to be done as part of the Public Improvement plan. The applicant will be responsible for posting securities for monumentation and public improvements.
November 15, 2022, Item #9
11 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
17. Prior to start of any work within a City-held easement or right-of-way, a Right-of Way Permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Division of the Development Services Department. All appropriate fees shall be paid prior to permit issuance.
18. Any private improvements within any publicly held easement or right-of-way may require an encroachment agreement as determined necessary by the City Engineer. All necessary encroachment agreements shall be approved and executed prior to grading permit issuance.
19. A fair share payment shall be required towards future adaptive signalizing efforts for traffic signals along Poway Road between Carriage Road and Community Road. The fair share payment shall be determined through an engineering study prepared by a certified traffic engineer and subject to approval by the Director of Development services.
(Planning)
20. The applicant shall provide the $106,000 contribution to the Community Benefit Fund ($500/dwelling unit) as one of the incentives to allow increased height and density for the project.
21. The formation of a homeowner's association (HOA) with maintenance responsibilities is required, unless project site is under single ownership (Single Owner hereinafter). Provide a Maintenance Exhibit for all site areas clearly indicating the responsible maintenance entities (Single-Owner or HOA, City, other).
22. Notarize and record an access agreement for residents, guests, retail and plaza users to have access to all publicly accessible areas (e.g., dog park, retail, restaurants, plazas), including the Town Center interior street, the pedestrian corridor, quasi-public open space, and parking areas and drive-aisles to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
This agreement shall be adhered to by the Single-Owner or HOA and incorporated into the CC&Rs if applicable to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services .
23. Permanent deed restrictions shall be executed restricting future development of the quasi-public open space to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
24. The property owner shall notarize and record an agreement not-to-oppose the formation of a future assessment district to fund public facilities and improvements that directly benefit property owners in the district (e.g., Community Facilities Districts (s), Landscape and Lighting District(s), Maintenance Assessment District(s), and Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District(s)).
25. The property owner shall notarize and record an agreement not-to-oppose the formation of a future business or property-based business improvement district in which businesses or property owners respectively are required to pay an additional levy to fund projects within the District's boundaries.
November 15, 2022, Item #9
(Public Works)
Resolution No. 20-091
26. The applicant shall annex the properties into the appropriate Lighting Districts prior to recordation of the final map.
H. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, unless other timing is indicated, the following conditions shall be complied with:
12 of 41
(Engineering)
1. If the project will be phased, the applicant will be responsible for presenting the phasing plan to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. The applicant may be required to enter a covenant to establish the timing of the installation of public and private improvements.
2. The applicant shall include provisions in their design contract with their design consultants that, following acceptance by the City, all construction drawings or technical reports accepted by the City (exclusive of architectural building plans) shall become the property of the City. Once accepted, these plans may be freely used, copied or distributed by the City to the public or other agencies as the City may deem appropriate. An acknowledgement of this requirement from the design consultant shall be included on all construction drawings at the time of plan submittal.
3. Submit a precise grading plan for the development, including private utilities, prepared on a City of Poway standard sheet at a scale of 1" = 20', unless otherwise approved by the City project engineer. The grading plan shall show the proposed private utilities (sewer and domestic water) for reference only. Storm drain, and fire water (non-building systems) will be permitted and inspected per the grading plan set. Submittal of the precise grading plan shall be made to the Department of Development Services Engineering Division for review and approval. The grading design shall be 100 percent complete at the time of submittal, ready for approval and issuance of permit. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. All technical studies as required by Chapter 16 of the PMC shall be submitted.
4. Since the project is proposing private utilities, a separate submittal for private utilities will need to be made with the Building Department. The Building Department must approve the plans prior to construction of any of the private utilities. Coordination shall be done directly with the Building Department.
Depending on construction phasing, it may be beneficial to submit these concurrently with the grading plan submittal so that all utilities are permitted at the same time. It shall be noted that if the City has to do any emergency maintenance on the private utility system, the City will not be held liable or responsible for any damage. Costs incurred by the City for emergency maintenance may be charged to the Single-Owner and/or HOA. Clear access to City meters and appropriate access easement is required.
5. Curb stops will be required on all parking stalls and shall be shown on the grading plans.
6. Fall protection fencing shall be required at the top of retaining walls and slopes as November 15, 2022, Item #9
13 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
required by the California Building Code and PMC. Fall protection fencing shall be shown on the grading plans.
7. Applicant shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) design features into the site development. These shall be clearly shown and identified on the site plan and be appropriately sized for the proposed level of development.
8. Water Quality Control - Drainage and Flood Damage Prevention A drainage study addressing the impacts of the 100-year storm event prepared by a registered Civil Engineer is to be submitted and approved. The study shall evaluate existing and proposed hydrologic and hydraulic conditions to the satisfaction of the City project engineer.
9. Water Quality Control - Design and Construction
The project shall comply with the City and Regional Water Quality Control Board stormwater requirements. The project is considered a Priority Development Project and will be subject to all City and State requirements. A Final Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) prepared by a registered Civil Engineer is to be submitted and approved. The applicant will be required to install approved trash treatment control devices and include these facilities in the SWQMP. a. Property owner shall execute an approved Storm Water Management Facilities Maintenance Agreement (SWFMA) accepting responsibility for all structural BMP maintenance, repair and replacement as outlined in the Operations and Maintenance plan. The easement and operation and maintenance requirements shall be binding on the land as outlined in Chapter 16.104 of the PMC.
b. Provide one copy of each of the exhibits necessary for the SWFMA. Exhibits shall include but are not limited to: Property and Easement Legal Descriptions, Site Plan, and an Operation & Maintenance (O&M) plan in accordance with Chapter 16.104 of the PMC.
c. Upon approval of the SWQMP, provide a PDF version.
10. Water Quality Control - Construction Storm Water Management Compliance Proof of coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit, 2009-0009- DWQ, as amended by order 2010-0014) shall be provided to the City along with a copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) .
11. Grading securities shall be posted with the City prior to grading plan approval per Chapter 16.46 of the PMC. A minimum cash security of $2,000 is required in all instances.
12. The applicant shall pay the storm water pollution inspection fee according to the latest adopted master fee schedule.
13. Following approval of the grading plans, posting of securities and fees, and receipt November 15, 2022, Item #9
14 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
of four copies and one scan of the approved plans, the applicant shall attend a pre construction meeting at the Department of Development Services. The scheduling request shall be submitted on a City standard form available from the City's project engineer. The applicant's action plan that identifies measures to be implemented during construction to address erosion, sediment and pollution control will be discussed. Compliance for sediment control shall be provided as directed by the project inspector.
14. Prior to start of any work within a City-held easement or right-of-way, a Right-of Way Permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Division of the Development Services Department. All appropriate fees shall be paid prior to permit issuance.
15. Construction staking is to be inspected by the Engineering Inspector prior to any clearing, grubbing or grading. As a minimum, all protected areas as shown on the approved grading plans are to be staked under the direction of a licensed land surveyor or licensed civil engineer and delineated with lathe and ribbon. As applicable, provide two copies of a written certification, signed and sealed in accordance with the Business and Professions Code, by the engineer of record stating that all protected areas have been staked in accordance with the approved plans.
16. If the disposal of groundwater is necessary during construction, a dewatering plan shall be submitted for review and approval. Extracted groundwater should be discharged to surface waters under the current general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Proof of coverage under this permit will be required. To protect water quality in the San Diego area, the City recognizes that it may be necessary to accept discharges of extracted groundwater to the sewer system. Discharges to the sewer system will only be allowed if it is determined that discharge of this wastewater into the sewer system is the most appropriate and prudent disposal alternative and when sufficient hydraulic and treatment plant capacity is available to allow such discharges into the sewer system.
17. Easements shall be dedicated or letters of permission from property owners and/or easement holders shall be provided for any proposed work within properties or easements not owned by or granted to the applicant.
(Planning)
18. In accordance with Mitigation Measure BIO-1 of the PRSP EIR, all construction related activities (including but not limited to mobilization and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, fence installation, demolition and grading) should occur outside the avian nesting season (generally prior to February 1 to August 31 or according to local requirements), all suitable habitats located within the project's area of disturbance including staging and storage areas plus a 250-foot (passerines) and 1,000-foot (raptor nests) buffer around these areas shall be thoroughly surveyed, as feasible, for the presence of active nests by a qualified biologist no more than five days before commencement of any site disturbance activities and equipment mobilization. If project activities are delayed more than five days an additional nesting bird survey shall be performed. Active nesting is November 15, 2022, Item #9
15 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
present if a bird is sitting in a nest, a nest has eggs or chicks in it, or adults are observed carrying food to the nest. The results of the surveys shall be documented . If it is determined that the birds are actively nesting within the survey area, Condition Number G.20 (Mitigation Measure 810-2 of the PRSP EIR) below shall apply.
19. In accordance with Mitigation Measure 810-2 of the PRSP EIR, if pre-construction nesting bird surveys result in the location of active nests, no site disturbance and mobilization of heavy equipment (including but not limited to equipment staging, fence installation, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, fence installation, demolition, and grading), shall take place within 250 feet of non-raptor nests and 1,000 feet of raptor nests, or as determined by a qualified biologist in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, until the chicks have fledged.
Monitoring shall be required to ensure compliance with the M8TA and relevant California Fish and Game Code requirements. Monitoring dates and findings shall be documented.
20. In accordance with Mitigation Measure 810-3 of the PRSP EIR, prior to the removal of mature trees and existing buildings, a preconstruction survey for maternity (March 1 to August 1) or colony bat roosts (year-round) shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within seven days prior to activities that remove trees or structures. If an occupied maternity or colony roost is detected, CDFW shall be contacted about how to proceed. Typically, a buffer exclusion zone would be established around each occupied roost until bat activities have ceased. The size of the buffer would take into account:
a. Proximity and noise level of project activities
b. Distance and amount of vegetation or screening between the roost and construction activities
c. Species-specific needs, if known, such as sensitivity to disturbance Due to restrictions of the California Health Department, direct contact by workers with any bat is not allowed. The qualified bat biologist shall be contacted immediately if a bat roost is discovered during project construction .
21. In accordance with Mitigation Measure CUT-4 of the PRSP EIR, a qualified professional archaeologist shall be retained who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct an Archaeological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried out by a cultural resource professional with expertise in archaeology who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Processional Qualifications and Standards. The training session would include a handout and focus on how to identify archaeological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, those duties of archaeological monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional archaeologist shall follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary.
November 15, 2022, Item #9
16 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
22. In accordance with Mitigation Measure CUT-5 of the PRSP EIR, if archaeological resources are encountered, ground-disturbing activities shall be ceased, and the treatment plan shall be implemented. In the event that archaeological resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities would not be allowed to continue until a qualified archaeologist has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work should be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area.
All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional archaeologist, who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/individuals shall be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The developer and City shall coordinate with the archaeologist to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of the archaeological data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.
23. In accordance with Mitigation Measure CUT-6 of the PRSP EIR, periodic archaeological resources spot checks during grading and earth-moving activities in younger alluvial sediments shall be conducted. A qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and standards shall be retained to conduct periodic archaeological spot checks beginning at depths below two feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing archaeological resources. After the initial archaeological spot check, further periodic checks would be conducted at the discretion of the qualified archaeologist. If the qualified archaeologist determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing archaeological artifacts, construction monitoring for archaeological resources would be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified archaeological monitor who would work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S.
Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards. The archaeological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill younger Pleistocene alluvial sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple archaeological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known archaeological resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of archaeological resources encountered. Full-time monitoring could be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the project archaeologist.
24. In accordance with Mitigation Measure CUT-7 of the PRSP EIR, a report shall be prepared upon completion of monitoring services. The archaeological monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S.
Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion of archaeological monitoring. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the South Coastal Information Center, the City, and November 15, 2022, Item #9
17 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources.
25. In accordance with Mitigation Measure CUT-8 of the PRSP EIR, the Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training would include a handout and would focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary.
26. In accordance with Mitigation Measure CUT-9 of the PRSP EIR, periodic paleontological spot checks during grading and earth-moving activities shall be conducted. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology to conduct periodic Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks would be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the Puente Formation or into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits, construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources would be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor, who would work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist.
27. In accordance with Mitigation Measure CUT-10 of the PRSP EIR, if paleontological resources are encountered, ground-disturbing activities shall be ceased, and the treatment plan shall be implemented. In the event that paleontological resources and or unique geological features are unearthed during ground disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside November 15, 2022, Item #9
18 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources.
Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist's discretion, and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing.
28. In accordance with Mitigation Measure CUT-11 of the PRSP EIR, upon completion of the paleontological monitoring activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as well as a description of the fossils collected and their significance. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, San Diego Natural History Museum, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the project and required mitigation measures.
29. Label and dimension all surface improvements (e.g., walkways, patios, landscape areas).
30. Show fencing, gates, and access to refuse areas and mechanical equipment, including HVAC systems.
31. All refuse areas shall have a trash enclosure as applicable and provide for recycling and compost bins (SB 1383). Refuse containers for residential uses shall be stored outside the front yard setback area behind fences with gated access.
32. A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained prior to the removal of all existing trees.
If the trees are proposed to be removed during the recognized nesting season for birds (February 15 and August 15), a nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist and report the findings in writing to the City. Between February 15 and August 15, removal of trees containing nests shall be delayed until such time as the nest(s) have been abandoned unless the removal can be completed in accordance with California State codes and the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918.
33. All crosswalks and driveway entrances shall feature high-quality materials such as pavers, cobblestone, or patterned, stained, and scored concrete. At least five percent of the total area of any surface parking lot must be similar high-quality materials. Special colored paving treatments shall be incorporated at strategic locations along the Town Center internal street, all drive aisle crossings, and at entry driveways.
34. Grades exceeding 12 percent shall be concrete with deep broom finish perpendicular to the access driveway.
35. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. The landscape and irrigation plans shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Poway Landscape November 15, 2022, Item #9
19 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
and Irrigation Design Manual, Chapter 17.41 PMC and substantial conformance to the approved conceptual landscape plans, and all other applicable standards and ordinances in effect at the time of landscape and irrigation plan check submittal.
To the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services, the landscape plans shall also provide the following:
a. Calipers, heights, and spreads at 15-year maturity shall be specified on the landscape plan and shall be to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
b. The 5-foot proposed landscape strip along the southerly property line shall include at a minimum every 10 feet a minimum one 15-gallon Strawberry Tree, Carolina Laurel Cherry, Photonia Fraseri, and/or similar species (screening trees) to obscure views from adjacent residents onto the project and vice versa to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. c. A minimum of 10 percent of the net lot area shall be landscaped. Include a note for this requirement and an area calculation on the landscape plan. d. The site design and landscape materials should be low maintenance. e. The landscaping plan shall incorporate a minimum one 24-inch box tree for every 30 feet of frontage along the public right-of-way. f. A minimum of one 15-gallon tree, per City specification, shall be provided for every three parking spaces. Tree wells may be used to satisfy the parking lot tree planting requirement. Said trees shall be located to provide shade cover for the vehicles where practical.
g. The ratio of 15-gallon trees to 24-inch boxed trees or larger shall be four to one (4:1).
h. Oaks proposed on-site are subject to tree preservation requirements. i. The plans shall include shrubs to provide screening of the parking areas as seen from adjacent public streets.
j. Special attention shall be given to provide landscaping that enhances the intersection corners.
k. Please provide a small planter between the garages that can accommodate a vine of a shrub. Such planter areas shall be located every two or three garages per the approved plans stamped "Exhibit A" on file at the Development Services Department.
I. The landscape plan for the quasi-public spaces shall reference at a minimum the following features, including areas and heights, as shown in the approved plans stamped "Exhibit A" on file at the Development Services Department to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director: water features, logs and boulders for sitting and climbing, play structures, shade structures, benches, picnic tables, crawl-through tree November 15, 2022, Item #9
20 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
trunks, and game tables. There shall be at least one 24-inch box tree for every 300 sf of quasi-public space area.
m. The removal of existing trees shall be replaced on-site with the planting of a similar sized tree of a species per the tree removal permit to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. The trees shall be planted per the approved landscape plans for the development project or if this project is abandoned, the trees shall be replaced according to a tree replacement planting plan reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
i. A modification to the number or sizes of the tree replacement requirement may be approved by the Director of Development Services as part of the landscape plan review. Please provide a written request to modify this requirement that outlines the reasons of the request.
ii. The replacement trees shall be planted prior to obtaining occupancy or within 24 months of their removal whichever comes first pursuant to the approved phasing plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
n. Art and murals can be used to add visual interest along a street corridor or within a district, and to celebrate history and culture. Original art and murals allow for creative expression and can be an attraction for visitors independent of stores and restaurants. Community members should be included in the development of original art to the extent possible. Review by the Department of Development Services is required to ensure the original art or mural is compliant with the PRSP and the PMC. o. The landscape and irrigation plan submittal are a separate submittal from other project plan check submittals and is made directly to the Planning Division. Contact the Planning Division for copies of applicable City standards, the landscape and irrigation plan submittal checklist and the plan review fee worksheet. Landscape and irrigation plan review fees are required and are the responsibility of the applicant. Any landscaped areas within the public right-of-way shall be permanently and fully maintained by the owner of the private property adjacent to the public right-of-way where the improvements are located to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
36. Per the incentives for the increased density and height allowances, a Deed Covenant shall be prepared that the public open space shall be remain accessible and useable by the public (i.e. no gate, wall, or other form of separation or restriction of access) from the public Right-of-Way, and that future use of the restaurant spaces identified in the approved plans stamped "Exhibit A" on file at the Development Services Department shall be restricted to restaurant or similar uses. The Deed Covenant shall be prepared to satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
37. An off-site parking and reciprocal access agreement between the property owners November 15, 2022, Item #9
38. 39.
40. 41 .
42. 43.
44. Resolution No. 20-091
of the Big 'O' parcel at 12947 Poway and the project site parcel shall be provided for the 17 parking spaces that the Big 'O' parcel is providing for the project. This agreement shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
The one-way drive aisle south of the Big 'O' building shall have directional pavement and traffic signs as recommended by the Traffic Engineer.
Traffic signage including speed limits, parking restrictions, stop and yield signs etc. shall be shown on the grading plans.
A minimum 42-inch high fence, with no greater than two-inch openings is required adjacent to drops greater than 30 inches.
All freestanding and retaining walls shall be constructed with decorative blocks or a finish consistent with the approved plans stamped "Exhibit A" on file at the Development Services Department to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
Any railing on top of a retaining wall that provides fall protection and all maintenance access gates in a freestanding wall must be constructed with decorative materials to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
The public pedestrian corridor through the site must have pedestrian scale light fixtures . The light fixtures shall be consistent with other decorative lighting fixtures within the project. Lighting shall be complementary to the intended style/theme.
Decorative lighting shall be provided at all entries. Lighting shall comply with PMC Section 17.08.220(L) except as otherwise noted herein. Parking lots, walkways and public plazas and open space areas shall be well lit for visibility and safety.
All utility connections shall be designed to coordinate with the architectural elements of the site so as not to be exposed except where necessary. Pad mounted transformers and/or meter box locations shall be included in the site plan with any appropriate screening treatment.
I. Prior to building permit issuance, unless other timing is indicated, the following conditions shall be complied with:
21 of 41
(Engineering)
1. The final map shall be recorded and accepted by the City.
2. Condo maps shall be recorded prior to building permit issuance.
3. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved grading plans on file with the Development Services Department and the conditions contained herein.
Grading shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the City Grading Ordinance, the approved grading plan, the approved soils report, and grading practices acceptable to the City.
4. Erosion control shall be installed and maintained by the developer from October 1 November 15, 2022, Item #9
22 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
to April 30. The developer shall maintain all erosion control devices throughout their intended life.
5. Applicant shall obtain a Grading Permit and complete rough grading of the site.
The grading shall meet the approval of the Engineering Inspector and the project's geotechnical engineer.
Following completion of rough grading, please submit the following:
a. Two copies of certification of line and grade for the lot, prepared by the engineer of work.
b. Two copies of a soil compaction report for the lot, prepared by the project's geotechnical engineer.
The certification and report are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
6. Prior to start of any work within a City-held easement or right-of-way, a Right-of Way Permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Division of the Development Services Department. All appropriate fees shall be paid prior to permit issuance.
7. The applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees in effect at time of permit issuance
(Planning)
8. Public street improvements shall be required (reference PRSP Chapter 5 and PMC 15.06.030) along Poway Road fronting the project consistent with the PRSP Chapter 5 Design Guidelines for Public Space and PMC 15.06.030 for all property frontages to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. This includes ADA compliant sidewalk transitions, bike lane markings, a median monument sign, wayfinding signs, street lighting, street trees (1 per 30 lineal feet), bicycle racks at property corners and adjacent to storefronts (three racks total), public seating (three total), trash and recycling receptacles (1 per 600 lineal feet), bus shelters, signage and seating, and new private drive entrances, and widened six-foot wide sidewalks (one-foot stamped and stained concrete). Landscape parkways and medians along property frontages shall be included into a Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) with maintenance funded by the project homeowner associations or a similar alternative where maintenance of public improvements is borne by the homeowner associations to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. Original art pieces are allowed on utility boxes to deter graffiti and enhance the streetscape until such time that utilities are placed underground. The public street improvements shall be secured or installed prior to issuance of any building permits.
9. The quasi-public space shall be improved and maintained by the Single-Owner or HOA. All walkways and seating shall be ADA compliant. The site design and landscape materials should be low maintenance. Include one 24-inch box tree for every 300 sf of surface area. The quasi-public space shall feature at a minimum the following features as shown in the approved plans stamped "Exhibit A" on file in the Development Services Department: water feature, logs and November 15, 2022, Item #9
23 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
boulders for sitting and climbing, a play structure, a shade structure, picnic tables, a crawl-through tree trunk, adequate pedestrian-scale and area lighting, and game tables. The quasi-public space improvements shall be installed prior to building permit final (certificate of occupancy). Public seating shall be provided by the rate required by the PRSP (1 seat per 100 sf of open space). A drinking fountain and at least one trash and recycling receptacle shall be provided at each plaza. The art shall be a minimum 300 cubic feet, excluding footings and stands, and shall include a durable foundation and materials to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. Art shall be in compliance with design standards in Chapter 4.10 and 5.6 of PRSP.
Art and murals can be used to add visual interest along a street corridor or within a district, and to celebrate history and culture. Original art and murals allow for creative expression and can be an attraction for visitors independent of stores and restaurants. Community members should be included in the development of original art to the extent possible. Review by the Department of Development Services is required to ensure the original art or mural is compliant with the PRSP and the PMC.
10. Commercial bicycle parking shall be provided at the rate of five percent of the commercial automobile parking requirement. Bicycle racks shall be located within 100 feet of a visitor entrance and readily visible to passers-by, preferably near building entrances and plazas.
11. The project shall feature ADA compliant ramps, stairways, and elevators. ADA access shall be provided to all project features, including the dog park, bus shelter, quasi-public and private open space, residential building entrances, and to the commercial components of the project. A separate ADA path of travel exhibit shall be submitted with the Building plans.
12. All architectural details shown on the approved plans stamped "Exhibit A" on file at the Development Services Department shall also be shown on the building plan check submittal. Any major modifications from the building and site design details not within substantial conformance to the approved plans will require a DR revision and City Council approval as determined by the Director of Development Services.
13. The building plans shall include details for all exterior lighting to demonstrate conformance with PMC Section 17.10.1 S0(H); including, but not limited to, reflecting light downward, away from any road or street, and away from any adjoining residential development. Lighting shall be maintained in compliance with City standards by the applicant for the life of the project.
A photometric analysis shall be provided after lighting installations to restrict light trespass and limit glare onto the adjacent public roads and onto existing neighboring properties to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
14. The dog run shall be open to the public and have a non-restricted entrance.
Signage restricting access to the dog run by the public is prohibited.
November 15, 2022, Item #9
24 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
15. The building plans shall include elevations and cross-sections that show all new roof-mounted appurtenances, including, but not limited to, air conditioning and vents, screened from view from adjacent properties, to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. Screening of utilities and mechanical equipment located on roofs is appropriate with architectural design elements such as the proposed Mansard Roof screen wall.
16. All residential units shall feature an interior bicycle rack area. If a unit has a garage, ceiling mounted bicycle parking sufficient for two bicycles shall be provided in the garage. Ceiling mounted storage racks, minimum 50 sf, shall be provided in each garage. Storage in corridors and assigned to units shall be consistent with the approved plans stamped "Exhibit A" on file with the Development Services Department.
17. Exterior building materials and finishes shall reflect the approved elevations on the approved plans stamped "Exhibit A" on file with the Development Services Department and the conditions of approval, and shall be noted on the building plans, to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
18. Demolition of existing structures shall include investigations for lead and asbestos with appropriate mitigations prepared by certified professionals.
19. In accordance with Mitigation Measure GHG-1, the installation of wood-burning devices such as fireplaces, stoves and heaters shall be prohibited.
20. Electrical charging stations shall be provided at the rate required by the California Green Code.
21 . The applicant shall pay the affordable housing in-lieu fee in effect at time of permit issuance.
22. Show building heights for the ground floor commercial shall provide 14-foot high interior clearance.
23. Ground mounted utility equipment shall be screened.
24. The building plans shall show all trash enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be adequately sized to contain the following waste streams: recyclables, organic waste, and trash. The trash enclosures shall also be sized to allow the City's exclusive franchise solid waste disposal company (EDCO) to adequately access the bins. The applicant shall contact EDCO to verify locations, correct bin sizes, and trash enclosure size. The trash enclosure shall sufficiently screen all the bins and be consistent with the design of the development.
(Building)
25. The development shall comply with the current addition of the California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, California Electrical Code, California Residential Code, California Fire Code, California Energy Code and California Green Code at time of submittal to the Building Division. All development shall comply with state structural calculations and seismic safety November 15, 2022, Item #9
requirements.
(Sheriff's Crime Prevention)
Resolution No. 20-091
26. Upon issuance of permits for grading, the applicant shall post and maintain adequate "no trespassing," signage on the properties, as well as file and maintain a current "Trespass Arrest Authorization form" with the Poway Sheriff Station, in order to allow for enforcement of unlawful access. During active construction, all work locations shall be adequately secured from access.
27. During active construction, all work locations are encouraged to add security cameras to maintain safety and security of the property during non-working hours to the satisfaction of the Sheriff's Crime Prevention Officer. Construction shall maintain an active list of all tools with make, model and serial number in case thefts occur after hours. Construction shall also consider adding engravings to declare ownership of tools or other materials.
28. The project shall be constructed according to Crime Free Multi-Housing standards.
29. The project shall create Neighborhood Watch and a Business Watch programs.
J. Prior to occupancy, unless other timing is indicated, the following conditions shall be complied with:
25 of 41
(Engineering)
1. The public improvements shall be installed and completed.
2. The driveway entrances along Poway Road will be required to provide enough clearance to prevent cars from bottoming out. This will also be applicable to the vertical curve at the bottom of the driveway that is to be used for the internal street.
3. All existing and proposed utilities or extension of utilities required to serve the project shall be installed underground. No extension of overhead utilities shall be permitted.
4. The drainage facilities, driveway, slope planting measures, and all utility services shall be installed, and completed by the property owner, and inspected by the Engineering Inspector for approval. All new utility services shall be placed underground.
5. An adequate drainage system around the new building pads capable of handling and disposing all surface water shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Engineering Inspector.
6. The stormwater facilities shall be complete and operational.
7. The applicant shall repair, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, any and all damages to public and/or private improvements caused by construction activity from this project.
November 15, 2022, Item #9
Resolution No. 20-091
8. All applicable easement dedications and maintenance agreements are to be recorded.
9. Two copies of record drawings, signed by the engineer of work, shall be submitted to Development Services prior to a request of occupancy, per Section 16.52.130B of the Grading Ordinance. Record drawings shall be submitted in a manner to allow the City adequate time for review and approval prior to issuance of occupancy and release of grading securities (at least three weeks prior to a request for occupancy is recommended). All other final reports and agreements, as outlined in Section 16.52.130 of the Grading Ordinance are to be approved. (Planning)
10. The Landscape and Site Plans shall indicate that sight distance restricted areas at intersections. Add a note that no landscape materials over 30 inches in height shall be placed in sight distance restricted areas.
11. Landscape, irrigation and exterior site amenities shall be installed prior to building permit final (certificate of occupancy) except as otherwise determined by the Director of Development Services. All exterior amenities shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services and substantially similar or of better quality than conceptual images provided prior to building permit issuance.
12. A Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) for the Site, including the signage criteria for future commercial tenants, shall be submitted to the City and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services within four months of final approval of the first building. With the exception of commercial tenant signage, all other project signage shall be finaled prior to occupancy. A phasing plan for the project signage installation may be approved to the satisfaction of the Development Service Director. The project shall have an on-site wayfinding sign program. On-site signs shall clearly direct drivers and pedestrians into and out of parking areas and to the shopping areas and plazas and include lighted directories.
The installation of signs shall be under a separate Sign Permit.
13. Signage shall be installed to distinguish which areas on the site are open to the public.
K. The following requirements shall be completed or maintained to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works:
26 of 41
1. The water and sewer system and associated equipment and facilities shall be located and designed per City standards and specifications for a public sewer and water system with standard valves and backflow prevention devices, including shut-off valves at each building and hydrant valves outside the spray zone, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the Director of Safety Services.
The water and sewer system shall be privately maintained by the Single-Owner or the HOA with emergency access and repair rights to the facilities to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the Director of Safety Services. A Hold Harmless Agreement shall be notarized and recorded for emergency access and repair by the City. Maintenance and certifications of the water and sewer system November 15, 2022, Item #9
Resolution No. 20-091
shall be as required by the Director of Public Works and the Director of Safety Services.
2. All new sewer manholes identified as private shall not have City of Poway name on them. All new sewer manholes identified as public shall have City of Poway name on them.
3. Abandon unused sewer laterals at the sewer main (at the "Y").
4. All onsite sewer mains shall have property line cleanouts installed at edge of Right of-Way on Poway Road or Carriage Road. The Sewer main for this project shall be designated as private, not public.
5. Prior to occupancy, a private Sewer Maintenance Agreement shall be notarized and recorded for the future repair and rehabilitation of the proposed private sewer.
The City will provide the template for the agreement.
6. Prior to occupancy, notarize and record a maintenance agreement for the on-going maintenance of the private street and access improvements, parking and other proposed paved areas, fencing, landscape and irrigation (private and within the public right-of-way along the property's frontage), and recreational and other facilities as specified to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Director of Development Services. This maintenance agreement shall be adhered to by the Single-Owner or HOA and incorporated into the CC&Rs, if applicable to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services and City Engineer.
L. The following requirements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of the Fire Department:
27 of 41
1. Fire Department access for use of firefighting equipment shall be provided to the immediate job construction site at the start of construction and maintained at all times until construction is completed. Access to each phase of development shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Fire Marshal
2. Prior to the delivery of combustible building material on site, the approved vehicle access for firefighting shall be installed, satisfactorily pass all required tests and approved by the City. All accesses shall be provided within 100-feet of all fire department connections. Use of temporary vehicle access for firefighting shall require plan submittal, review and approval by the City.
3. Approved fire apparatus access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building. The fire apparatus access roadways shall extend to within 150-feet of all portions of the project and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of all buildings as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility.
4. The project shall be accessible to Fire Department apparatus by way of access roads shall have an unobstructed, improved width of not less than 20 feet. In most cases, the City of Poway construction standards for streets (Chapter 12.20 PMC) will be more restrictive. The more restrictive standard shall apply. Fire apparatus November 15, 2022, Item #9
28 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus not less than 75,000 pounds unless authorized by the FAHJ and shall be provided with an approved paved surface as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. A paved driving surface shall mean asphalt, concrete, or permeable paving system.
5. The project shall be accessible to Fire Department apparatus by way of access roadways with all-weather driving surface of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width. Vertical overhead clearance shall be a minimum of 13 feet 6 inches. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus not less than 75,000 pounds unless authorized by the FAHJ and shall be provided with an approved paved surface as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. A paved driving surface shall mean asphalt, concrete, or permeable paving system. This 20-foot access width is the minimum required for Fire Department emergency access. In most cases, City Engineering standards will be more restricting. The more restrictive standard shall apply.
6. The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum of 28-feet as measured to the inside edge of the improvement width or as approved by the fire code official.
7. Fire apparatus access roads, including all private drives, shall not be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. A minimum of 20-feet unobstructed access is required. All applicable areas shall be designated as "Fire Lanes" with appropriate signs and curb markings.
8. All dead-end fire access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions that allow emergency apparatus to turn around.
9. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roadway shall not exceed 20 percent.
Grades exceeding 15 percent (incline or decline) shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete (PCC), with a deep broom finish perpendicular to the direction of travel, or equivalent, to enhance traction. Grades exceeding 10 percent shall be constructed of asphalt or PCC. Permeable paver systems shall not be used for grades exceeding 10 percent. The fire code official may require additional mitigation measures where he or she deems appropriate.
10. The angle of departure and the angle of approach of a fire access roadway shall not exceed ?-degrees (12-percent) or as approved by the fire code official.
11. Approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both.
12. A lighted directory map, meeting current fire department standards, shall be installed at each driveway entrance to multiple unit residential projects and mobile home parks, where the number of units in such project exceeds 15.
13. All gates or other structures or devices that could obstruct fire access roadways or otherwise hinder emergency operations are prohibited unless they meet the standards approved by the fire code official and receive Specific Plan approval.
November 15, 2022, Item #9
29 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
All automatic gates across fire access roadways and driveways shall be equipped with approved, emergency, key-operated switches overriding all command functions and opening the gate(s). Gates accessing more than four residences or residential lots, or gates accessing hazardous institutional, educational or assembly occupancy group structures shall also be equipped with approved emergency traffic control-activating strobe light sensor(s), or other devices approved by the fire code official, which will activate the gate on the approach of emergency apparatus with a battery backup or manual-mechanical disconnect in case of power failure. In the event of a power failure, the gate shall be automatically transferred to a fail-safe mode allowing the gate to be manually pushed open without the use of special knowledge or equipment. All automatic gates must meet fire department policies deemed necessary by the fire code official for rapid, reliable access.
14. Each building shall display the approved numbers and/or addresses in a location plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background and a size approved by the City. Each building address shall also be displayed on the roof in a manner satisfactory to the Fire Marshal, and meeting Sheriff Department-ASTREA criteria.
15. Prior to the delivery of combustible building material on site, the approved water service to all fire hydrants shall be connected to the public water supply, satisfactorily pass all required tests and be approved by the City.
16. The entire water system for the project shall be looped. The addition of on-site fire hydrants is required. Fire hydrants shall be located within 400 feet of any portion of the facility or buildings, with spacing between hydrants not to exceed 400 feet, as measured by an approved route of travel that a fire engine would travel. The Fire Marshal shall approve the location of all fire hydrants.
17. A water systems analysis will be required to establish available fire flow. The required fire flow shall be according to Appendix B of the 2019 California Fire Code and approved by the City. The water supply system will require approved improvements to include the addition of water mains and fire hydrants as determined and approved by the Fire Department and City Engineer.
18. Water main sizes and fire hydrant locations are conceptual only and shall be reviewed and approved by a separate plan submittal to the City of Poway.
Reduced Pressure Detector Assemblies (RPDA) shall be used with the private fire service water main. All fire hydrants and backflow preventer devices (RPDA) installed in the City of Poway shall be per the City of Poway approved material list and current Supplemental Engineering Standards.
19. Fire protection systems and details are conceptual only and shall be reviewed and approved by separate plan submittal to the fire department. The fire department will review and inspect the backflow preventer devices (RPDA), fire sprinkler underground service, fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems, kitchen hood and duct systems, and any alternative fire suppression systems. The City of Poway, Development Services Division will review and inspect the private fire service water main and fire hydrants.
November 15, 2022, Item #9
30 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
20. All buildings are required to be equipped with an approved fire sprinkler system according to PMC requirements. The fire sprinkler system shall be designed to meet minimum design density at the roof per NFPA 13 requirements for all non residential areas. The fire sprinkler system installed in the residential occupancies shall meet NFPA 13R requirements. All systems are required to be monitored by a U.L. listed central station monitoring company. Backflow valve assemblies with tamper switches shall be monitored. The City Fire Marshal shall approve the location of these fire protection devices prior to installation. A separate submittal, with applicable fees, for the underground fire service lateral connected to each separate fire sprinkler riser system is required. A separate plan submittal, with applicable fees, for each, separate building's fire sprinkler system design is required. Separate fees for plan check and inspection services will be charged by the Fire Department upon submittal.
21. All four-story buildings are required to be equipped with an approved Class 1 automatic wet standpipe system according to CFC and PMC requirements. The standpipe system shall be installed according to NFPA 14. A separate plan submittal, with applicable fees, for each, separate building's Class 1 automatic wet standpipe system design is required. Separate fees for plan check and inspection services will be charged by the Fire Department upon submittal.
22. Fire sprinkler riser(s) shall be located inside an enclosed closet with an exterior access man door. Door shall be labeled with a sign indicating "Fire Sprinkler Riser."
23. A metal sign with raised letters at least one-inch (25 mm) in size shall be mounted on all fire department connections serving automatic sprinklers, standpipes or fire pump connections. Such signs shall read: AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS or STANDPIPES or TEST CONNECTION or a combination thereof as applicable.
RPDA and FDC shall have approved address signage.
24. All buildings are required to be equipped with an approved automatic fire alarm system in accordance with the CFC. The systems shall be installed according to NFPA 72. The system shall be completely monitored by a UL listed central station alarm company or proprietary remote station. Each building may require a separate plan submittal and fee. The Fire Department shall determine the number of separate plan submittals and separate fees based upon proposed system design.
25. A hood and duct extinguishing system shall be installed for all commercial cooking facilities within a kitchen area. A plan submittal to the fire department is required prior to installation.
26. A 'Knox' Security Key Box shall be required for each building at locations determined by the City Fire Marshal.
27. If an elevator is installed in a building, at least one shall be sized to accommodate a normal ambulance gurney. Minimum dimensions for the inside car platform shall meet the "Medical" size standards per the California Building Code.
28. Smoke alarms shall be installed in all residential bedrooms and adjoining hallways.
The smoke alarms shall be hard-wired, with a battery backup, and shall be November 15, 2022, Item #9
Resolution No. 20-091
interconnected in such a manner that if one detector activates, all detectors activate.
Carbon monoxide alarms shall be installed in residential hallways adjoining bedrooms. The carbon monoxide alarms shall be hard-wired, with a battery backup, and shall be interconnected in such a manner that if one detector activates, all detectors activate.
M. The following requirements shall be adhered to upon establishment of land uses and occupancy is granted to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services:
31 of 41
1. All physical elements of the project, excepting improvements for buildings, including public street improvements, shown on the approved building, landscape, grading, improvement and related plans shall be substantially maintained per the approved plans, except as noted herein, to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
2. Proper drainage shall be maintained throughout this subdivision as to prevent ponding and/or storage of surface water and shall be in compliance with the NPDES permit to the satisfaction of the Water Quality Coordinator and the City Engineer.
3. The ground-floor 11,364 square-foot retail and restaurant space shall be limited to commercial uses permitted within the underlying zone to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. The community benefits for the project include a "restaurant row" that includes two restaurants on-site. These community benefits must remain in place unless an alternative community benefit is provided and approved by City Council. The combined seating for the two restaurant uses shall maintain a minimum interior seating capacity of 80 persons.
4. Outdoor dining furniture shall comply with the following:
a. Furniture and fixtures should be of high quality, aesthetically appealing, durable, and of sturdy construction, able to withstand strong winds without falling over.
b. Maintain outdoor furniture at all times and ensure it is free of fading, corrosion, splinters, dents, tears, and chipped paint.
c. Prohibited furniture includes flimsy plastic tables and chairs, unfinished wooden materials, and sofas.
d. Do not store outdoor dining furniture in the public-right-of-way overnight. e. Seating should contribute to an inviting atmosphere that encourages outdoor dining.
5. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) or other agreement approved by the City shall be submitted to the City for review and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services and shall be written to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services and the City Engineer. The CC&Rs shall November 15, 2022, Item #9
32 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
include the conditions herein to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services and shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the final map and shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
The formation of a homeowner's association (HOA) with maintenance responsibilities is required, unless project site is under single ownership (Single-Owner herein).
All uncovered parking spaces shall remain unassigned and open to use by the residents, guests, retail customers and quasi-public plaza visitors.
A Best Management Practices (BMP's) and a Private Driveway and Drainage Maintenance Agreement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The maintenance and the preservation of drainage and BMP facilities shall be included.
The CC&Rs shall identify and implement the BMP's identified in the SWQM P prepared for this project and state that the Developer, Current and Future Property Owners shall comply with the recommendations of the SWQMP prepared for this project to the satisfaction of the Water Quality Program Coordinator and the City Engineer. Funding of the long-term maintenance of all facilities required by the SWQMP shall be included in the annual HOA or Single-Owner budget.
The CC&Rs shall include on-going maintenance of landscaping and irrigation (private and within public right-of-way) of parkways, the public open space areas as illustrated on approved landscape and irrigation plans on file at the Development Services Department. A copy of these plans shall be included in the CC&Rs. All landscaping shall be well maintained in a healthy growing condition at all times in substantially the same condition as approved in accordance with the approved landscape and irrigation plans. Sprinkler heads shall be adjusted so as to prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk or the street. The proposed sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The HOA or Single Owner or, its successors or assigns, shall remove and relocate all irrigation items from the public right-of-way at no cost to the City, and within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City Engineer. An Encroachment, Maintenance, and Removal Agreement shall be notarized and recorded prior to recordation of the final map or building permitting.
The City will provide the template for the agreement.
All landscaping, including areas within the adjacent public right-of-way, shall be adequately irrigated, and permanently and fully maintained by the owner at all times in accordance with the requirements of the City of Poway Landscape and Irrigation Design Manual. Trees shall be encouraged and allowed to retain a natural form. Pruning should be restricted to maintain the health of the trees and to protect the public safety. Trees should be trimmed or pruned as needed to develop strong and healthy trunk and branch systems. Tree maintenance and pruning shall be in accordance with "American National Standard for Tree Care Operations" latest edition (ANSI A300). Trees shall not be topped, and pruning shall not remove November 15, 2022, Item #9
33 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
more than 25 percent of the trees' leaf surface .
Street trees along the roadway shall not obstruct the ability of fire apparatus access and fire department aerial operations . Tree height and type should be considered in the ultimate landscape design.
Immediate removal of graffiti and any other type of offensive debris is required .
The exterior colors and materials shall be substantially consistent with the color and material board submitted with the application to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services . Any modificat ions to the color and materials sample board shall be submitted for review and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services .
All garage doors shall be automatic roll-up type doors and equipped with remote control devices .
All garages shall be available for required off-street parking . The minimum size of a garage shall be 10-foot-wide by 20-foot-deep interior clear space .
Minor projections are permissible into this space where it can be found that the projections would not hinder the placement of a vehicle within the area.
No parking is permitted within the Town Center interior street, drive aisles, pedestrian pathways , or designated fire lane area at any time. Parking on site is only permitted within designated parking spaces and within the dwelling units' garages .
No on-site parking spaces that are not within a garage shall be assigned .
Maintain the drainage facilities and any access easements (where they occur) on the property .
All light fixtures shall be designed, shielded and adjusted to reflect light downward, away from any road or street , and away from any adjoining premises.
The property shall comply with all performance standards relating to the generation of noise , glare, dust, and odor.
If any fire hydrant is taken "OUT OF SERVICE ," the Fire Department shall be notified immediately and the hydrant marked, bagged, or otherwise identified as "OUT OF SERVICE" as directed by the Fire Marshal.
Designated fire apparatus streets and turn-arounds shall be maintained accessible and usable by emergency vehicles . Usable conditions include, but are not limited to, the following :
i. An all-weather road surface shall be maintained .
November 15, 2022, Item #9
34 of 41
Resolution No. 20-091
ii. Road shall support imposed loads of fire apparatus at 75,000 pounds.
iii. No parking-fire lane signs shall be repaired or replaced as needed. iv. Fire lanes shall remain free at all times of any obstruction including but not limited to: vehicles, storage, debris, etc.
v. Fire lane or hammerhead turn-around shall maintain an unobstructed width of 20 feet and a minimum 13' 6" vertical clearance.
vi. Grades exceeding 12 percent shall be concrete with a deep broom finish perpendicular to the access roadway.
vii. Fire Department approval and conditions are required for fire apparatus access roads with grades between 10 percent and 20 percent.
viii. All required fire access roads and turn arounds shall have a minimum 28 foot turning radius or as approved by the fire code official.
Wood burning devices are prohibited.
Safety features including fire sprinklers, ignition resistant construction, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and fire resistive landscaping shall be maintained in accordance with California Fire Code, California Building Code, California Vehicle Code (fire lanes), City Municipal Code and any other applicable codes.
All trash and recycling receptacles are prohibited in parking areas, including covered parking areas, and are required to be within the individual residences of the proposed planned development at all times, except where sufficient trash enclosures are provided.
Rooftop mechanical equipment, including but not limited to heating, air conditioning and ventilating equipment, shall be screened so that it may not be seen from the level of adjacent streets and sidewalks.
The use of barbed wire or razor ribbon on any fences, gates, or walls is prohibited.
Ongoing maintenance of the onsite private sewer and water systems are required to the satisfaction of the Director of Safety Services and the Director of Public Works.
All private and quasi-public open space areas shall be well maintained at all times (e.g., bike racks, barbeques, tables, landscape, signage, and public art features).
November 15, 2022, Item #9
Resolution No. 20-091
All gates and fences on the properties shall be regularly maintained, secured and repaired. All gates granting access to City utility easements shall be maintained and accessible to City of Poway staff with use of a City approved padlock, issued or placed by Poway's Public Works Department.
New swimming pools shall be covered when not actively in use as required by the California Energy Code.
All swimming pools shall be adequately secured from access and maintained in a safe condition. Inspection staff employed with the County of San Diego Vector Control Division shall be granted regular access to inspect swimming pools and landscaping ponds on the properties as needed or investigate other vermin/vector related concerns on the properties.
Signs prohibiting recreational vehicles or trailers shall be posted within parking areas. Signs shall indicate the consequences of violating the statute (towing, fines or citations), as well as the tow company's phone number.
The CC&Rs shall clearly establish the responsibilities of the individual homeowners and the HOA or Single-Owner with regard to the continuing maintenance and preservation of the project.
The CC&Rs shall give the City the right but not the duty to enter the premises to do maintenance and levy assessments if the homeowners fail or refuse to maintain said facilities.
Amendments to the CC&Rs that affect any requirement of this resolution shall require express written consent of the City.
The quasi-public open space areas shall be well maintained at all times (e.g., bike racks, water feature, shade structure, play equipment, game tables, landscape, signage, and public art features).
SECTION 8: The approval of TTM20-003 and DR20-002 shall expire December 1, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., unless prior to that time the final map is recorded and a Building Permit has been issued and construction has commenced on the property unless prior to the expiration, a request for a time extension is submitted to the Development Services Department and a time extension is subsequently granted by the City Council. The final map conforming to this conditionally approved TTM shall be filed with the City so that the City may approve the parcel map before this approval expires.
II
II
II
35 of 41
November 15, 2022, Item #9
Resolution No. 20-091
SECTION 9: The parties are hereby informed that the time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 1st day of December, 2020 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES :
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
ATTEST:
36 of 41
MULLIN, LEONARD, GROSCH, VAUS
NONE
FRANK
NONE
Steve Vaus, Mayor
November 15, 2022, Item #9
OWNER'S STATEMENT
YI[ HEREBY STATE THAT 'NE AAE THE 0',l,NERS Qr OR ARE INTERESTEO 1N THE LANO SUBDl\110£0 BY THIS MAP AND W£ CONS£NT TO THE PREPARATION ANO RECOROATION Of THIS MAP.
Iii( HEREBY OEO!CAT[ TO Tli( CHY or POWAY THE PUBLIC ACCESS 0.SEMENT, TH( PEOCSTRIAN ACCESS EASfl.lENT, THE WATER EASEMENT, ANO All ... ccrss RIGHTS TO POW.t.Y ROAD EXCEPT AT APPROVED ,_CCESS LOCATIONS.
LOT 1 Of THIS SUBOI\IISION IS A C01'1DOl,,IINIUM LOT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 1351 Of' THE O\IIL COOE Of" THE STATE Of' CALlfORNIA CONTAINING A MAXIMUM C£ 212 DWELLING UNITS ANO 6 COMUERCIAL UNITS AND IS rlLEO PURSUANT TO TH[ SUBDl...,SION MA.P ACT. 0~ER: FAlfffl[lD POWAY UC, A DELAWARE L1WTE0 LIABILITY COI.IPANY BY:
NA.I.IE:
TITLE:
BY; FRH CC MANAGER LLC,
A OELAW.a.RE UM.IT(D LIABILITY COMPANY
.::tilMB(RMAN~
-----
om, R·11•ll...
BENEFlOARY:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A., A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION,. BENEFICIARY UNDER A DEED or TRUST RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0B4603B OF OfflCIAL RECORDS.
CITY OF POWAY TRACT NO. 20-003
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 14 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY · OF POWAY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 3922, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, JULY 11, 1975.
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE FURNISHED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO. 961321-M
NOTARY ACKNOWLEQGMENT
A NOTARY PUBl!C OR Ol1i(R OfTICER COMPLETING THIS CERTlflCA TE VE.RlflES OHL Y THE IDENTITY or TH[ INDl\1DUAL 'M-10 SIGNED TH( DOCUUENT TO 'MUCH THIS CERTlACAl( 15 ATTACHED, ANO NOT THE TRUTHfULNESS. ACOJRACY, OR VALIDITY or THAT OOCUM(Nf.
STATE or CALEORNIA
COUNTY Of %1>' ~~O )
ON -~~~ JL '- 01.,?.. EFORE ME,
_bW1:,~•-~---- A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY
APPEA.RED_,o.____ ---~~- 'M-iO PRO\/£D TO ME ON THE BASIS Of SATISFACTORY E\10[NCE TO BE TI-t[ PERSO~{S) \liHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEOCEO TO M[ THAT HE/SHE/THEY EX£CUTm THE SAU[ IN HlS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZEO CAPAOTY(IES), ANO TliAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATIJRE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT, TllE PERSON(S) OR TllE ENnlY UPON BEHALf Of WHICH TllE PERSON(S) ACTED. EXECUTED TH[ INSIRUM[NT.
I C(RTIFY UNDER PENALTY or PER.tlRY UNO[R THE LAWS or THE STAT£ OF CAUFOONIA THAT THE FOR[COING PARAGRAPH 15 lRUE AND CORRECT. BY: ___ BY, ~~-~ NA•E: NAME:/fi,y,;._, r
TI!lf, ================== TITlf.;,,a,i: ~G< ffl8,i:,f,._,,...--• 'MTNESSMY~AN
SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ::J;. _ _ __ __ __ _
UY PRINCIPAl PLAC( OF BUSINESS IS ~ CiOJb c.otA'1+f
UY COMt.!ISSION NO. IS "':l .,01.11 fl..f
!Ea...:,-...'..:..f ' ta!:.::',';:',,.. ,;f J .,c-._o,uu,u'! E SHEET 2 fOR ADDITIONAL NOTARY ACKNO\\I..EDGMENT
SIGNATURE ot,nssmN STATEMENT
THE SIGNATURES or THE fOllOYll~G PARTIES HAVE BEEN OMITTrD UNDER THE PR0\1SIONS OF SlCTlON 66-436, SUBSECTION (o) (J) (A) (i-.,;ii) Of THE SUBOI\IISION MAP ACf, THEIR INT£REST. ~f, IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPtN INTO A FEE TinE ANO SAIO SIGNATURES ARE NOT REOOREO ..- BY ll1E GQV[RN1NC BOOY.
3. THE COJNTY Of SAN OIECO HOI.OER Cf" AN EAS[t,![Nl roo PUBLIC ROAD ANO INOOENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED S[PTEMBER 19, 1944 AS BOOK 1744 PAGE 317 Of OfflC IAL RECORDS.
5. THE COJNTY or SAN DIECO HOlO[R Of AN EASEMENT roo PUBLIC ROAD A.Ml INCl0£NTAJ.
PURPOS£S, RECORDED MARCH 8, 1950 AS BOOK 3531 PAGE 195 OF OfflOAL RECORDS.
6. THE COJNTY Of SAN DIEGO HOLC[R OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD ANO INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECOR0£0 AUGUST 9, 1950 AS BOOK 37J1 PAGE 6 Of OFFICIAL RECORDS. m ~~~~Ml~NI~~u~t~T R~~it6~N~
0 it i9u6~u~su~~~JM~~ ~i~~~~1~ ~R~CISAts
RECOROS
m ~a~~NPiJ~rA: l~~:VEtiA~/~~~~iSR~~5~~E!~~~:~~ 1~~~
1 !SAl~~TRUMENT
NO. 157767 or OfftCIAL RECORDS,
~ ~~p~~;~YR~C::o DIM~~ l~~~:1 ~ l~~=\N~ci.~5i~BLJJ ~~ti_N~E~g:::TAL [g] ~~p~~TYR~c:~~O DIME: 2~°;~:~ ~ t~~J~::~~N~ri.~5~B~ ~"gA~~E~~TAl
13. SAN OIECO CAS 4r. ~CTR IC COi.iP.ANY HOt.D[R or AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTiUCAL rAOUTlES ANO GAS PIPELINES ANO IN00£NTAL PURPOSCS. RECORDED JANUARY 3, 197l AS INSTRUlilENl NO. 73- 002302 Of OFflCIAL RECORDS.
THE LOCAllON OF ™E EASEMENT CANNOT BE DET[RMINED FROM RECORD INFORMATION.
15. SAN ClECO GAS &: ELECTRIC COMPANY HOlOER Of AN EASEMENT FOR EL.ECmlCAL FAOLITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED DECEMBER 2, 1975 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 75-338498 or Off1C1Al RECORDS.
niE LOCATION OF niE [.t,S(l,l[NT CANNOT BE D£T£RMINE0 FROM RECORD INFOR1,IATIOO.
17. AN EASEMENT rOR EITHER OR BOTH POt.E LINES. UNDERGROUND CONDUITS TOCETliER 'MTH ni[ RIGHT Of INGRESS ANO EGRESS ANO INODENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED .tlNE 6. 1976 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 75-17-49&0 OF OFflCIAL RECORDS. IN rA','QR or: SAN OIECO CAS ANO ELECTRIC COMPANY.
THE LOCATION Of' TH( EASEMENT CA.'IINOT B( OETERUINED FROM RECORD INFORMATION.
NOIT: ITEM ,S 3. 5 ANO 5 LIST[O A80v(0 FALL WITHIN THE ()([SllNC 50' HAlF-'MDTH Ric.HT-OF WAY or POWAY ROAD AS DEDICATED PER ITEl,IS ~ANO @) ANO ARE NOT SHO'IIIN •• C .t V CONSULTING, INC.
98JO IR"IINE CENTER DR!\£
IR\1NE. CA., 92618
~9.916.3800
MY COLOollSSION EXPIRES ~2:_~~~
CITY Cl ERK'S CERDflCAIE
1. CARRIE CALLAGHER, OTY CLERK OF THE CITY Of POWAY. STAT£ CJC CALIFORNIA, HEREBY carnf'Y THAT THE QTY COUNCIL OF SAJO OTY HAS APPROVED THIS SUSOIVISION MAP ON , 2022 AND HAS ACCEPTED ON B[HAlJ' OF Tli[ OTY OF
POWAY THE PUBLIC ACC£SS EASEMENl, THE WATER EASEl,IENT, THC P£DESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT, ANO TH( ACCESS RIGHTS 10 POWAY ROAD, ALL AS SHOWN HEREON.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 664J-4(C) or TH( STAT£ SVBOL\IISION MAP ACT, THE FOLLOWING EASE1r.4ENT IS HEREBY VACATED:
THE CITY OF POWAY AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO THE POWAY lr.4UNIC!PAL WAT[R OISTRlCT, THE EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE ANO INCIDENTAL PURPOSES PER DOCUMENT RfCOROEO MAY 15. 1975 AS INSTRUUENT NO, 75- 117718 OF ornaAL !,(CORDS. THE EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PlPEUN~S ANO INOOHHAL PURPOSES, RECORDED OCTOOER 18. 1976 AS INSTRUM~NT NO. 76-J-4235-4 OF OfTIC!AL RECORDS. BOTH NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP.
CARRIE GALLACHER
OTY a.ERK. CITY OF POWAY
DATED:
BONO & ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE
YE:, COUNTY mEASURER-TA)( CCUECTOR or THE COUNTY Of SAN OIECO, STAT[ or CALIFORNIA.
AND DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS Of" SAID COUNTY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THERE AR( NO UNPAID SPEQAL ASSESSMENTS OR BONDS 'M-+ICH UAY BE PAID IN FULL, SH0\11111 BY THE BOQl(S OF OUR omcrs. AGAINST Tli( fflACI OR SU8Ql',1SION 00 ANY PART Tl-lEREOF SHOYIN ON THE ANNEXED t,0.P ANO DESCRIBED 1N THE CAPTION lH[REOF.
DAN lolcALUSTER BY: ________ _
COUNTY TREASURER-TA)( COt.LECTOR DEPUTY
DATED:
.£ff C. UONEDA BY; ________ _
DIRECTOR or PUBLIC WORKS FOR DIRECTOR
DAITO:
MAP NO.
SHEET 1 OF 5 SHEETS
SURytYORs's STATEMENT
I, EDWARD L. RE'rnOlOS, A PROFESS:ONAL LANO SURVEYOR, STATE TH.Al THE SURV(Y OF 1111S SIJBOIY'ISION WAS UAOE BY M£ OR UNDER MY DIRECTION ON 11-2-4-2017 ANO SAID SURI/CY IS TRUE ANO COMPLETE AS 9i0~ ; THAT MONUMENTS or THE CHARACTER INDICATED HAVE BEEN SET OR FOVNO Al lHE SUBOl'IISION BOUNDARY CORNERS, ANO I 'NILL SET ALL OTHER UONUMENTS Of TH[ CHARACTER ANO AT TH£ POSmON 1NOICATED BY LEGEND IN THIS LI.AP 'MTI-llN JO DAYS Afl[R THE COMPI..ETlON Of ni[ REOUIRE0 IMPROVEMENTS ANO SUCH MONU\IENTS ARE OR W.Ll BE SUFflOENT 10 ENABLE THE SURVEY 10 BE RETRACED.
(SEE LECCNO ON SHEET 2).
I HEREBY STAT[ THAT lHIS rn,i.t,L MAP SUBSTANTlAU.Y CONFORMS 10 THE APPRO'w'EO OR CONOITJONALLY APPROVED TENTATI'VE IJAP •
t:L.~ 8/9/22
EDWARD L RE'rnCUIS LS. 7725 DATE
MY REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12/31/23
CIJY ENGINEER'S 'sTAmAENT
I, MELODY C. ROCCO. OTY [NGINEER Of TliE CHY Of POWAY, STATE OF CAllf'OIUilA, STAT£ niAT I HAVE: EXAMINED nilS lol.AP. CONSISTING OF 5 SHEETS, AND THAT niE SU90l\11510N AS SH~ 15 SUBSTANTIAlLY Tli[ SAME AS 11 APPEARS ON TH£ T[NTATI'VE MAP; ANO ANY APPROVED AlT[RATIOHS lHER(OF':
THAT All PROVISIONS Of THE SUBOI\IISION MAP ACT AND Of' TH[ LOCAL OROINANC(S A~PUC.ASLE AT TliE TIUE or APPROVAL or THE TENTATIVE MAP.
HAVE _af;1, .. ~J.1;ertmt -
76424
e,/§_jp
-,--DATE
CIJY ENGINEER'S TE0:1NICAL STATEMENT
I HEREBT STATE THAT I HA\'{ [XAIIINEO lHIS MAP ANO I AM UAP IS T£CHNICAI.LY CORRECT.
AJJ,
PAUL E. COEBa.. P.L.S. 6486
,~4u,1-~
CLERK PF ])jE BOARD PF SUPER'i1$0RS CERTIFICATE
I, ANDREW POTTER, Cl.ERK OF THE BOARD Of SUPERYISORS. HEREBY ctRTIFY THAT TliE PROV.SIONS OF THE SUBOl\11SION LIAP ACT (OI\IISION 2 Of TITLE 7 OF' THE COvtRNUENT COO() REGARDING (A) DEPOSITS roo TAXES, ANO (B) CERTIFICATION OF niE ABSENC( OF LIENS FOR UNPAID STA.Tr. COUNTY. MUNIOPAl OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPEOAL ASSESSMENTS CO..LECT£D AS TAXES EXCEPT lHOS( NOT 'l'ET PAYABLE. HAVE BEEN COMPUEO 'MTH.
ANDREW POTTER
O..ERK ~ THE
BOARD OF SUPERI/ISORS
BY: _______ _
O(PUTY
DATE
RECORDER'S CERDFJCAJE
Fll£ NO. ___________ _
I, ERNEST, J. ORONEN81.1RC ... R, RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN CICCO, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HA'v! ACC[PT[O FOR RECORDAT10N THIS MAP fllEO Al TliE R[OO(Sl. Of EDWARD L. REYNO.OS, LAND SVRvf.YOR. THIS --DAY or, ------- AT _______ o·a.ocK J .
ERNEST. J. DRONENBURC • .R.
COUNiY RECORDER BY _________ _
FEEl_
CITY OF
POWAY
DEPUTY COUNTY RECORDER
FTM 21-003
November 15, 2022, Item #9
CITY OF POWAY TRACT NO. 20-003
BASIS Of BEABINGS
THE BASIS OF' SEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE CALIFORNIA STAlE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTE~ NAO 83, ZONE 6, EPOCH
1991 .JS ANO IS BASED ON THE GRID BEARING BETWEEN CONTROL MONUMENTS 531 AND 532 PER RECORD OF SURVEY 14492 . t.E.
NORTH 56.23'44 " EAST.
QUOTED BEARINGS FROM SAID REFERENCE MAPS MAY OR 1.4AY NOT BE IN TERMS OF SAID SYSTEM.
THE COMBINED SCALE FACTOR Al STATION NO. 532 IS 0.9999571 .
GRID DISTANCE "' GROUND OtSTANCE X COMBINED SCALE FACTOR. ~
[ ] INDICATES RE~ORO DATA PER Rl UNLESS NOTED OiHERWlSE .
R1 lNDICA TES PARCEL I.IAP NO. 3922.
R2 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER MAP NO. 6877.
RJ INDICATES PARCEL MAP NO. 4078.
R4 INDICATES MAP NO. 127 14.
RS INDICATES DOC If 2021-0335443 D.R.
R6 INDICATES PRIVATE SURVEY N 389 (PS-389)
SFN lNDICA TES SEARCHED rDUND NOTHING
• FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED.
0 0
0 INDICATES SET 2" X \ 8. IRON PIPE \'i1TH DISC STAMPED "LS 7725" OR LEAD, TACK &: DISC STAMPT£0 "LS 7725· OR SPIKE &: WASHER STAMPED " LS 7725".
lNOICA TES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
MONUMENT NOTES
FD. DISC S TAMPED .RCE 9954" IN S.S.t.1. ON 0.8' PER R2.
FD. J/4" IP & DISC STAMPED RCE 5713 IN S.S.M. ON 0.5' PER R6.
ACCEPTED AS THE E 1/4 COR SEC 14.
@ FD. 2" IP &: TAG STAMPED "LS 3369. CN 0 .4'. ACCEPTED AS THE SE COR LOT 6 PER R2.
0 ®
©
®
©
©
©
®
BOUNDARY ESTABLISHMENT NOTES
EST. TANGENT OF POWAY ROAD (FROM POINT "A" TO P.1.) BY HOLDING RECORD ANGULAR RLLA TIONSHIP [ 1 J6 "27'5B'"] PER R2.
HELO REC. ANGLE [90'J6'49"' ] PER Rl TO EST TI-iE [. LINE SEC. 14.
EST. E. UNE OF R1 150.00' V(LY CF l.L PARALLEL TO THEE . LINE OF SEC. 14. FITS EXISTING PERU.AETER WALL
EST. W. LINE OF DOC I 2021-0016985 O.R. :034.00 ° W'LY OF" & PARAL LEL TO THEE .
LINE OF S'E:C. 14.
EST. -411.00' S'LY OF&: PARALLEL TO THE C/L OF POWAY ROAD PER MAP NO. 4472 .
SFN - EST PER RS.
SFN - EST. BY INT.
EST. W. LINE OF Rl 500.00' Y/LY OF & PARALLEL TO THEE. LINE OF SEC. 14 Pf.R Rl & R6.
@K
All REFERENCES TO SEC. 14 HEREON RErER
TO SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP i 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 W(Sl , SAN BERNARDINO MERIDW-1.
C .!t V CONSULTING, INC,
911.JO IR\1NE CENTER DRIVE
IR\INE. CA., 92618
949.916,3800
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
NOTARY ACKNOl'y1,EDGMENT
A ,'IOTARY PUBLIC OR ODiER OfFlC(R COUPt.ETINC THIS CERTIFICATE: v[RIFl(S ONLY THE IDENTITY Cr TH[ l~OiYIOUAl 'M-10 SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO 'liHICH THIS CERllf'ICAT£ lS ATTACH::O, ANO NOT lHE TRUTHnJLNESS. ACCURACY. OR VALIDITY Of THAT DOCUMENT.
STAl(Qr™-~
COONTYor"B,...~
ON_,_,A~2~----+1.o:ZZ~=~c-!' "°"' "'· --.l.Al..'1\\16. . --- -· A NOTARY FL:euc. PEnSONAlLY APPEARED__ -~~-~- \'r1-IO PROV£0 TO ME ON THE BASIS OF
SATISfACTORY [\I\CiENC( 10 E rHE PERSOO(S) 'M-iOSE NAME{S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE 'MTHIN INSJRUMEtH ANO ACKNO'M..EOG£0 JO ME THAl HE/SHE/THEY EXECIJIEO ™E SAi.iE IN HIS/HER/lHEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HlS/HER/™EIR S!CNATUR:'.(S) CN rnr INSTRUI.IEtlT, THE FlE.RSON(S) OR THE ENTI1Y UPCN BEHALF or 'MilCH THE ?ERSON(S) A.CTEO, CXECUTED THE ltJSTRUl.!ENT
I C[Rllf"'I' UNDER F'(NALTY or P(R..UR'I' Ut,,D[R rn£ LAWS OF THE STAT[ Of CAUFORNIA THAT TH[ COR[GO<NG PlPH I TR [ AND COfiR[CT.
YIHNESS 1.1'1' HAND hk
SIGrlATURE _ __
PRINTED NAU( __ _ __ _
MY PRl~CIPAL FlLAC( or ~IS ~.
~! ~~~~:::: ~~~~~s- ~ ·6l~2.~13 ·
. ---~~ -::-~~~ --;.-:-·
'"j '":' ::
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER Of"nC(R COMPLEllNG Tt!IS ctRTIRCAT[ ~Rims ONLY THE JOENTIT'I' Of THE INOWIOUAL V.llO SIGNED lHE DOCUMENT TO Vll-llCH THIS CCRllrlCATE IS A.TIACHEO. AND NOT THE TRUTI-IFULNESS. ,\CCURACY, 00 VALIDITY Of THAT DOCUMENT.
STATE Of CALIFORNIA
COUNTY Of ________ )
ON~~--,--.=::::::::::::::_-c, °"No°'r"',R""r PLJsifc.E~°tR~~~LLY AflPCAR£0, ____ _,,, _--,,,-c-,=~~- WNO PROVED TO I.IE ON THE BASIS OF SAnSFACTORY E\1DENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) 'M-iOSE NAI.IE(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE Y.HHIN INSIR\J~ENT ANO ACKNO'M..EOGED JO UE THAT HE/51-!E/TH('f EXECUTED THE SAi.iE IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED C.a.PACITY(l(S), ANO THAT B:Y HIS/HER/Tli[ !R ~CiNATURE(S) Otl Tl-t[ INSTRU',!ENT, THE PLRSOO(S) OR ·THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF C,- WHICH THE flERSON(S) ACTED, EX.EOJT(O THE tNSTRW[rn.
I C£RTlfY UNDER PENALTY OF P£R.AJR'f u.~OER THE LAWS or ll-iE STATE or CALIFORNIA THAT THE FCflECOINC PARAGRAPH IS TRUE ANO CCRRECT.
WITNC$S ~l'f HANO
SlCNAlVR( ________ _____ _ ______ _
PRINTED NAM( ______ _
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE Of" BUSINESS IS ___ __ _
MY COML41SSION NO. IS ________ _
MY COMI.IISSION EXPIRES ___ ________ _
MAP NO.
SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS
~ !
I
~' ~R)
-----VICINITY MAP
5CALC: NONE
CITY OF
POWAY FTM 21-003
November 15, 2022, Item #9
100
1""5
50 1DD
=
CITY OF POWAY TRACT NO. 20-003
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
PROCEDURE OF SURVEY & GPS BASIS OF BEARINGS SHEET
STATION l 531 PER
FD. 2.5" DISC STAMPED "RC[
6-404" IN Yl£LL MON. DN. 0.5'
CREE DRIVE
MAP NO.
SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS
,----- ---7
1 '. --~"~
r,.,23"462.6 R~n · __________ _
I
_.---- -- , , <- 161.93'
566
-0S'J(E 691.95' _ • • --- • C/L
0-.._ ,.<-----t:-fi.-~---:Y.~ ;;,-- ;,'2no· ,,162 .,9· ~~ - -m. 1 D _
----n~---· C/L c•29'.04 ~ :;i f'~~?~"E(R)
I
O 0. ,._-::•2.00 tf(S
I ~ ----------:; IFB"50'04"
I
POWAY ROAD I --
1 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1·= 100'
ROS MAP NO. 14'92 . ' t
--------=-=----~ ,,:,--
6'2591:l' GRQUNO -- _. - - - _. 2i; ', I I
~ ~ \ ·~~~6';".~'
~ ~ ~ 52?_51'(R) . LOT
5i I
OROHAVE_t:! LANE
TATION lli...f
ROS MAP NO. 1"492 .
FO. 2S DISC STAMPED
_..-i,---
I -----
t,i56Lj'44"£. <i" a{,'~\NG~ .- _. _. _. .- < ' ~~s __ -,GR\o t51 ',, < ~
DETAIL A
~~LE~
--- 1615.'oS D::I '
~ ' ,
~ ', s,S,,
NOTE: All REFERENCES TO SEC. 14 HEREON
REFER TO SECTION 1-4, TOWNSHIP 1-4 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIOIAN.
"JI"";~, ,..,,
l.96'~~0:,
~,.',, , ,,
______ J
S88llS'J1"E 11.ga· [12 .00· R
2 ]) _,,---------- - - _ sa6-o5'Jn 1974.90' [1974 .9l' R2J '', ,,-- - - - NW COR R1 '-, f • . . - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - - _ ------ POWAY ROAD c ', · ---... 2 J JS'
36 ' fO. 2" IP & TAG ILLEG ON 02' j - - /,- - - 1~ - - -"" , ,. 6 72.1'' [
6 72.lO' R
4 ] ' , G •••.
1 ;f -"" "'"' ~ '""" ' =,.• "':\' ~ /~" ,<;);,'' ~ -, ~- 0 ~ .,. '"" --- C " -7. ----- ,, - ~ - -----l PER MAP NO. 6877. BEING A . ,ri>-~(§l y - . c••SG-4, <\ '° I' , - '3 o . '°I ', \ -- ;\ POINT ON THE EAST/WEST / , c,; ll"~,,o0;::,-:-_i;·.S'1~ •• ~.SB \l 2.00 NTS•,. "' ~ @--'- ... '\ CENTER OF SEC. 14 LINE. ,✓-.~,~~,. ll_;- ";.,·.s·ss L ~ N88'05'31"W 5;□ .56' I ---- \ ·1, / '(.-•'' ,, (i) I."' I s~;s'-~ I ;,, I
/ C/L I ~ 1/ fii\-----1 ::; ;3 I
11:! / _, , I _DCC #. NOTE, SEE SHI 4 & 5 FOR EAS!:MENT DETAILS \.'.!/7 ;': ,; 150'___.J ~
:J ~- I 18e -4454 o l LOT 1 !>,'>'l, F :£ ir ,,_:-
1 ;,,
,;b I I C .R. N "S ~ ~~ ; I~
• RCE 9954" IN WELL
MON. ON. 0.5' .
ROBISON l!U~VARO - - - - - _N~~!o:.._w .1_0.!"i..:_ n, SEE DETAIL A HEREON / ,~ ,~ ,; • I '.°'. 7, ◄ 32 AC. GROSS • 6, I;..
✓ tl ".'J"\o.,"':J ~,'1-~'l.\ O I ~ ·t.0 6.622 AC NET · ·p.--""---b~ C:l} I;:
0:: '-;,,~~)' ~ ____ _ L _ _ ___ -<_ "> • ~ F ~ r: :s:
~ ~SFN - ~ -,t' I~ DCC # 1991 -0G 5'3697 ~ ~ DOC # 2G21 ·-·D01!3985 O.F:. ., i ~~ : I Ul 7( \(!) ;:: 0 ~ \;; -~ i:'1 I \ _. ~ g , ,-5 I
~
fl -~' a:: 0 •,,-,,-,.:, O"• • ,_ ... ,. • ~"' '1', I
~o'i" <,,,,~ ~ , o ---- -- . l,v .. ~ ,·.V,'., -··C,.).):J44:, O.F:. ·~ u 1 L ,I. /. ~~~' I(.) •, / _ •. ~ E N66"05'31"W 884.05' •.• ~ , g ©--i ~'t- / b,~ _ -= - - - ' ',-- 534.03' G , · · - •••• ~ ,' G I 0 ~ -~ - .. - -:::- _ _ _ 350.02 •• , I ff'- I.,_,\ 4(' I,:. ; 1.-:eflTi.97SC: 1 51152 15;iTs,i755Tyi-571<;R-===~ 'SFN ~ "'~ ,_, ,.,· ,,;, . • • ·· - I
;)
/ C/L I g SfN - ALL LOT C~NERs'~(ONG ;;;; ,,:-& E. LINES OF MAP ND. ◄◄ 72 :
POINT "A" / I I I ,.--~~~
l ~ I
FO. DISC ILLEG., IN S SM ON 1 2' .
PER PARCEL I.IA? NO.' 4o7a. · · z L1NE TABLE
L1NE BEARING LENGTH
L1 S01'17'40~W 197.03' M&R5
L2 ssa·os'J1"E 82.10' M&R5
CALIFORNIA ZONE 6 NAD83
CONVERGENCE ANGLE AT POINT 531
WITH A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR
OF 0.9999471 PER R.O.S. 14492.
L3
L4
LS
L6
S01'17'40"W
ssa·os•31"E
s01·17'4o·w
S88'05':WE
16.00' M&R5
11 o.oo· M&RS
50,00'
157.92' M&RS
C .!! V CONSUL TING, INC.
9830 ll\1NE COITER DRIVE
ll"1NE. CA., 92618
949.916.3800
CITY OF
POWAY FTM 21-003
November 15, 2022, Item #9
25 5G
~
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=..: 50' ,
CURV[
Cl
CUR\'[ TA8l [
DEL TA I RADIUS
1·44'59• 1@_,_Q_O_'
- : • \ "C/L ~J,_,~-~
~ 10 -~ t.- s·so·o,·
~ 12 I R=1050.oo·
~ L=161.90'
/} Cl..,,.~ •
• .. ,/ / J.1~~ ~,~- ~
I', '·•_)::, \~--- ' r.,
sr:;'o:,~,.,..- ,' lAJ
__ ,,/ /
~
~
;
;.__
51 LENGTH
31.:Q7'
);\
CITY OF POWAY TRACT NO. 20-003
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
EXISTING & PROPOSED EASEMENT DETAIL SHEET
PROPOSED EASEf.lENTS
POWAY ROAD
0 INDICATES THE WATER EASEMENT
DEDICATED ANO ACCEPTED HEREON.
S881l5'31"E 691.95'
~
.
N881)5'J1"1'/ 530.56'
LOT
~ ---- - --------- --- ---~
C & V CONSUL 11NG, INC.
9830 IRVINE CENTER ORM:
IRVINE, CA., 92618
949.916.3800
LINE
l5
l7
LB
L9
llO
l20
L21
l22
l2'
L24
;:.
I I
N8s·o5•31·w 884.05'
LINE TABLE
BEARING LENGTH
son1'4o•w 50.00'
S01'17'40"W 62.4 6'
s01·,r.:o·w so.so· (so.ss· R6]
son7'.:o·w 11.97'
N01"17'40"E 5.00'
Nes·~2·2o·w 31.80'
S01'17'40"W 14.60'
NOrl7'40"E 18.70'
N88"05'J1"W 17.47'
N01'5,f29"E 13.00'
MAP NO.
-~ - - -~
~ ~ ~
I -----
~
--2s.s·-'L2-J _ _j\
~
,g.rO-
❖o - 7
~~~
------~ --- ---
l
CITY OF
POWAY
SHEET 4 OF 5 SHEETS
FTM 21-003
November 15, 2022, Item #9
i
MAP NO.
CITY OF POWAY TRACT NO. 20-003
SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS
[ LINE TA □ LE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
LJO N88"05'Jl"W 27.02'
L31 N01'17'40"E 76.02"
LJ2 t~B8'05'J1"W 21.21'
L33 N88"05'J1"W 26.17'
L34 N85"04'20"W 25.03'
L35 N89 'J9'10"W 25.0\' -- ~
~
·o
~
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
EASEMENT DETAIL SHEET
POWAY ROAD
PROPOSEJLEASEMENTS
([] ~~~;~5 ~~(d~~uc Accr.ss EASEMENT orn1cAT£D ANn
@J INDICATES THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT DEDICATED
AND ACCEPTED HEREON.
-~
L36 N88"05'J1"W 25.31'
L37 N01'54'29"E 2.50'
L38 N01"54'29"E 4.67'
L39 N881J5'J1"W 29.90' J- \ ,-,< 200.05' ,, -- ------------'='.'.._ _____ _2-a, IX) S'g] ::m ll. 12'_,_";', .-"/ \
~ -' 1 I~ \
,,-S.:.~~ N88'05'31"W 530.56'
325.51'
----
.:.~-
~
L ◄ O N01"54'29"E 4.67 '
L41 N01"54'29'E 4.67'
L<2 N8B"05'J1"W 16.90'
L43 N01'54'29"E 4.67'
L4' N5YJ2'26"W 29.09'
L45 N881)5'J1"'YI 24.12'
"'
N8ff05'Jl "W 25.7.l'
L47 N53"32'26"W 30.86'
L48 NB8'(15'18"W 1.00'
L49 NBB"0S'J1"W 1.00·
L50 N881)5'Jl"W 25.04'
L51 N01"54'29"E 120.50'
L52 N88"()5'Jl"W 6.01'
L53 NBB"OS'Jl"W 16.85'
LS< N01"54'29"E 67.77'
~
L57 - \ LS~ [ ~ - VARIES
''I ..,1.. Ill~-,..,.,
r-,,,.-_,,;-L62 ~, s; ~
I ~ -
:1~ L531 w
;1::s 1, ~
I I -~ I L52-i ~
If"- 1::: ~
Ji ~I ~ 1 J' f1 ~1 v 11 ~ ~, ,
11 , ·v1 (., I
-~ G I
q_~
.._-fl•
.,,,.,.,,,,,
L55 N01"54'29 "E 72.25'
L56 N01"54'29"E 2.00'
L57 N88"05'31"W IS.JO'
L58 N01"54'29"E 6.58'
L59 N88"0S'Srw 14.16'
L60 N01:l4'29"E 42.16'
L61 N01'54'29"E 47.67'
L62 N881J5'Jl'"VI 5.17'
~ ;...
N88'05'3l"W ;,,11;,, ~ z~ ___ _ ""'°5~29· , :JI 1~ , 0 B NB8'05'3 1"W 175.37' • 7' · e : ~11::: "' :!l :
"JUD l·o :;;::11\;; - - N68'05'31'w17D7'- - -;1 I ~ "' !" !" ii .
I I~ ~::~ , I I~
25 . w o I o 25' ..,.
I,!; Im z 1z ,-
1 '" l:n -c;; 11 !"I :;;: m ~ I" I I ~. IN : ".; \ ~ [cl 11 1 SEEOETAILCBELOW ii~ ;\g L63 N0rS,4'29"E 6.08'
L64 N88"05'31"W 24.29'
L65 N01"54'29"E 62.00'
··-·l.66 N01-~29"E_ 72.00'
I
I
-7
!~~ I ·? UO - . I
I
I
I
I
I
: 1~5.00' I I
'I I ;., 1'-ill 25' I
o 1- I
01'.J I L t< ~
'ii : I " ~ I [".i I,( -
- , 1 O" 7
5: '-_'::-_L~±--"3_d'y __ [fl \ u, I l3◄ t---:::;.,==------ I \ I ------ ~ I L_ -
~ L_K, __ --- I
;
'-I/ I I DIT~LB _J
l._::AL~E _______ _
L< .U5±··· T N88'05'31"W27867' 11 ~ :el ~ o g((fil"low
ii''" LC"=~~~ ~;:c,,;-;...;c ~ ~ ~ -:c=-~t=:_1:_=:_=:_"'i'.¥JI~'f.1'o,= = = = = ==" 1t-J'·~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~3.f~~f--~ t~ ~ ~=4~ I;; le·:.... _ ~ N N88'05'31"W783.04' - - - - - - - - - - - - ____ _j'•?'·E:~ - - - - - - - - - - - - ______ ~aa·os•3~a~o •.:_ __________ K! ____ ~ .. -=-~~ -~
J
50 -+-
I
25 50
,- ~,-7
~ --9 0
I
@l;i L39 ;,rp I
_ _l _ _ 'f'-,::i:;;-1.t.'.. __ ----r-----~ ~ ---1-
1 DITAIL C _J
~[:~ -- --
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"= so·
$~ -
r-------,
I I lw I
I
.< " I 25' It l I 6" [cl ,~:. V __ __ T ____ L,_ §!:, I -- - -r --- ,. ,,, I C ·o.
I -:..,. I---~'~./ L-15 ~ g; I
l,-.>'.~{2 -;' 2!
-Jt - _j .. LSD_- \ a.
B O in 8 \ 'o
I
N N :'-i I,; I
-- ----;".1,.--- o·
'.'-.' ,;. - L36 - Ill 5
I
v ·5 j ,/ I
I DIT~L D NON[
-- -- -- --
N //'
_J
g:
§
"' ~
~
~
C .t V CONSUL TING, INC.
9830 IR',!NE CENTER ORll'E
IR',!NE, CA., 92618
949,916.3800
CITY OF
POWAY FTM 21-003
November 15, 2022, Item #9
November 15, 2022, Item #10
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA RE PQ RT City of Poway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Carrie Gallagher, City Clerk LA4-
(858) 668-4535 or cgallagher@poi:lay.org
Resolution Amending the City's Local Conflict of Interest Code
CITY COUNCIL
The Political Reform Act requires every local government agency to adopt and promulgate a Local Conflict of Interest Code to provide for the filing of Statement of Economic Interests Form 700 by designated employees of the City. In accordance with Government Code section 87306.5, at the June 7, 2022 City Council meeting, Council directed staff to review the City's Conflict of Interest Code for possible amendments to reflect any added, changed or deleted positions since the last Local Conflict of Interest Code was adopted on September 1, 2020. The attached Resolution amends Exhibit A of the City's Conflict of Interest Code to address personnel changes.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council adopt the Resolution amending the City's Conflict of Interest Code in accordance with Government Code Sections 87300 through 87314.
Discussion:
The City's Local Conflict of Interest Code (Code) adopts the standardized Fair Political Practices Commission's (FPPC) Conflict of Interest Code and any future amendments promulgated by the California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 18730. The Code designates positions required to file a Statement of Economic Interests, also known as Form 700, and assigns disclosure categories to those positions specifying the types of interests to be reported to help determine if any disqualifications exists in making or participating in making decisions on behalf of the City which may have an influence on their financial interests.
The Political Reform Act requires local government agencies to review its Local Conflict of Interest Code every even-numbered year to ensure that it is accurate and current. In accordance with Government Code section 87306.5, at the June 7, 2022 City Council meeting, Council directed staff to review the City's Conflict of Interest Code for possible amendments to reflect any added, changed or deleted positions since the last Conflict of Interest Code adoption . 1 of 11
November 15, 2022, Item #10
City staff reviewed the City's current Conflict of Interest Code and determined the list of designated positions must be updated. Exhibit A of the attached resolution represents the list of "designated employees" that are required to file Statement of Economic Interests Form 700. The proposed amendments reflect changes to position titles, positions that no longer exist, and the addition of new positions that meet the definition of a "designated employee" since the adoption of the last Local Conflict of Interest Code on September 1, 2020. The Political Reform Act defines a "designated employee" as an officer, employee or consultant whose position entails the making or participating in the making of governmental decisions that may foreseeably have a material effect on any financial interest. Exhibit B of the attached resolution defines the various categories of financial interests that must be disclosed and are assigned to a particular"designated employee" based upon their respective job duties. There are no proposed changes to these categories. The revised exhibits make up the appendix to the City's Local Conflict of Interest Code and must be adopted by resolution by the code reviewing body. The City Council serves as the code reviewing body for the City of Poway's Local Conflict of Interest Code.
A strike-out version of the updated Conflict of Interest Code is provided for review as Attachment B.
It should be noted that positions listed in Government Code Section 87200 (i.e. Mayor, City Councilmembers , City Manager, City Attorney and City Treasurer) are not considered "designated employees." These positions are identified and required to file Form 700 pursuant to Government Code Sections 87200 through 87210 with the Fair Political Practices Commission.
Environmental Review:
This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Resolution
B. Strikeout version of Conflict of Interest Code
Reviewed/Approved By:
Assistant City Manager
2 of 11
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #10
RESOLUTION NO. 22-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT
OF INTEREST CODE UPDATING DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES
AND OFFICERS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 20-074
WHEREAS, the Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000, et seq.) requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes designating employees and what financial interests must be disclosed by those employees, and prohibiting the participation by such employees in decisions in which they have a financial interest;
WHEREAS, the Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730) that contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code, which can be incorporated by reference in an agency's code. After public notice and hearing, the standard code may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act;
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore adopted, as the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Poway (the "City Code"), the model conflict of interest code set forth in California Code of Regulations Section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission;
WHEREAS, the Appendix to the City Code attached hereto as "Exhibit A" (in which officials and employees are designated) and "Exhibit B" (in which disclosure categories are set forth), which may be modified by City Council from time to time, and all of which together does constitute the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Poway; WHEREAS, individuals holding designated positions shall file their statements of economic interests with the City Clerk, which will make the statements available for public inspection and reproduction (Gov. Code Sec. 81008). Upon receipt of the statements for the Mayor, Council members, City Manager, City Treasurer and the City Attorney, the City Clerk shall make and retain copies and forward the originals to the Fair Political Practices Commission. All other statements will be retained by the City Clerk;
WHEREAS, the City Council has designated those positions that are subject to the reporting requirements of the Code;
WHEREAS, the Political Reform Act requires the City to review its Conflict of Interest Code biennially to determine if it is accurate or, alternatively that the code must be amended; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the City's Conflict of Interest Code to reflect the deletion and addition of certain City positions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct.
ATTACHMENT A
3 of 11
November 15, 2022, Item #10
SECTION 2: That the standard FPPC Conflict of Interest Code, as set forth in Title 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730, and as may be amended from time to time by the Fair Political Practices Commission, is incorporated by reference and constitutes the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Poway.
SECTION 3: That the list of designated positions subject to the requirements of the Conflict of Interest Code are amended as set forth in "Exhibit A" and their respective disclosure categories are set forth in "Exhibit B".
SECTION 4: That the City of Poway has conducted the 2022 Biennial review of its Conflict of Interest Code, as required by the Political Reform Act, and as a result of the biennial review determined the need for an amended Conflict of Interest Code as presented in this Resolution.
SECTION 5: That Resolution No. 20-074 is hereby repealed.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 15th day of November, 2022 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED :
Steve Vaus, Mayor
ATTEST:
Carrie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
4 of 11
November 15, 2022, Item #10
EXHIBIT A
APPENDIX TO THE CITY OF POWAY CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE:
DESIGNATED POSITIONS
City Employees Position/Title Disclosure Category
Accountant 1, 2
Assistant City Manager 1, 2
Assistant Director of Finance Operations 1, 2
Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations 1, 2
Assistant Director of Public Works - Utilities 1, 2
Assistant Engineer 2,3,4, 5
Assistant Planner 2, 3,4, 5
Associate Civil Engineer 2, 3,4, 5
Associate Planner 2,3,4,5
City Clerk 1, 2
Citv Enaineer 1, 2
City Planner 2,3,4, 5
Code Compliance Officer 2, 3,4, 5
Community Outreach Coordinator 2, 3,4, 6
Construction Maintenance Supervisor 2, 3,4,6
Contract SpecialisUlnspector 2, 3,4, 6
Deputy City Attorney 1, 2
Deputy City Clerk 1, 2
Deputy Fire Chief 2,3,4, 5
Deputy Fire Marshal 2,3,4, 5
Director of Community Services 1, 2
Director of Development Services 1, 2
Director of Finance/ Treasurer Unlimited Disclosure
Director of Human Resources & Risk Management 1, 2
Director of Public Works 1, 2
Facilities Maintenance and Special Districts Supervisor 2, 3,4, 6 Finance Manager 1, 2
Fire Battalion Chief 2,3,4,5
Fire Chief 1, 2
Fire Safety Inspector 2,3,4, 5
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 3,6
GIS Analyst 4,6
Information Technology Analyst 3,4,6
Management Analyst 2, 3,4,6
Management Assistant 2, 3,4,6
Network and Computer Systems Administrator 3,4,6
Network & Computer Systems Analyst 3,4,6
Parks Maintenance Supervisor 4,6
5 of 11
November 15, 2022, Item #10
City Employees Position/Title Disclosure Category
Parks and Trails Area Manager 2, 3,4, 6
Principal Civil Engineer - Utilities 2, 3,4, 5
Public Works Operations Manager 2, 3,4, 6
Recreation Area Manager 2, 3,4, 6
Revenue and Operations Manager 2, 3 ,4, 6
Revenue and Operations Supervisor 2, 3,4,6
Senior Accountant 1, 2
Senior Accounting Technician 1, 2
Senior Civil Engineer 2, 3,4, 5
Senior Code Compliance Officer 2, 3,4, 5
Senior Fire Safety Inspector 2, 3,4, 5
Senior Human Resources Analyst 2, 3,4, 6
Senior Management Analyst 2, 3,4, 6
Senior Planner 2,3,4, 5
Special Projects Engineer 2,3,4, 5
Utilities Administrator 2,3,4,6
Utility Systems Supervisor 2,3,4,6
Warehouse Associate 3,5
Wastewater Utilities Supervisor 2, 3,4,6
Water Treatment Plant Manager 2, 3,4,6
Water Utilities Distribution Supervisor 2,3,4,6
Boards, Committees, & Commissions Disclosure Category
Budget Review Committee 1, 2
Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee 1, 2
*Poway Housing Authority Unlimited disclosure
*Public Financing Authority Unlimited disclosure
*Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency Unlimited disclosure Mayor and Councilmembers hold the positions on the Authorities and Agency marked by * Consultants
Consultants shall be included in the list of designated employees and shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure category in this Code subject to the following limitation :
The City Manager or his or her designee, may determine in writing that a particular consultant, although a "designated position," is hired to perform a range of duties that are limited in scope and thus not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements described in this Section.
Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The City Manager's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as the Conflict of Interest Code .
6 of 11
November 15, 2022, Item #10
Statutory Filers; Officials Who Manage Public Investments It has been determined that the positions listed below are either officials specifically required to file statements of economic interests or are officials who manage public investments, as that term is defined in 2 California Code of Regulations, Section 18701 (b). These officials will file a Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700, all schedules) without any limitation as to disclosure categories (GC § 87200 et seq.):
General Provisions
Mayor
Members of the City Council
City Manager
City Attorney
City Treasurer
All designated employees required to submit an initial Statement of Financial Interest shall file the original with the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this Resolution. Initial statements shall cover the period of the twelve (12) months prior to the date of the adoption of this Conflict of Interest Code.
All individuals appointed, promoted, or transferred to a designated position shall file statements within thirty (30) days of assuming office. These "assuming office" statements cover the period of the twelve (12) months prior to the date of assuming office.
Annual statements shall be filed with the City Clerk by April 1 of each year by all designated employees. Such statements shall cover the period of the preceding calendar year.
Every designated employee who leaves office shall file, within thirty (30) days of leaving office, a statement disclosing financial interests held or received at any time during the period between the closing date of the last statement required to be filed and the date of leaving office.
Any employee serving in dual roles may file a combined statement by reporting according to their broadest range of disclosure.
Failure to file the required statement in a timely fashion may result in the imposition of administrative, criminal, and civil sanctions as provided in Government Code sections 81000- 91014.
7 of 11
November 15, 2022, Item #10
EXHIBIT B
When a designated employee is required to disclose investments, business positions and sources of income, he or she need only disclose investments in business entities and sources of income, which do business in the jurisdiction, plan to do business in the jurisdiction or have done business in the jurisdiction within the past two years. In addition to other activities, a business entity is doing business within the jurisdiction if it owns real property within the jurisdiction. When a designated employee is required to disclose interests in real property, he or she need only disclose real property other than his principal residence, which is located in whole or in part within or not more than two miles outside the boundaries of the jurisdiction or within two miles of any land owned or used by the local government agency.
Designated employees shall disclose their financial interests pursuant to the appropriate disclosure category as indicated in Exhibit "A".
DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
8 of 11
1. All investments, business positions and sources of income including gifts, loans and travel payments.
2. All interests in real property within the jurisdiction of the City.
3. All investments, business positions and sources of income including gifts, loans and travel payments subject to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the Designated Employee's department, unit or division.
4. All investments, business positions and sources of income including gifts, loans and travel payments that are engaged in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property within the jurisdiction of the City.
5. All investments, business positions and sources of income including gifts, loans and travel payments that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery, vehicles or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the City.
6. All investments, business positions and sources of income including gifts, loans and travel payments that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the Designated Employee's department, unit or division.
November 15, 2022, Item #10
APPENDIX TO THE CITY OF POWAY CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE:
DESIGNATED POSITIONS
City Employees Position/Title Disclosure Category
Accountant 1, 2
Assistant City Manager 1, 2
Assistant Director of Finance Operations 1, 2
Assistant Director of Public Works - Operations 1, 2
Assistant Director of Public Works - Utilities 1, 2
Assistant Engineer 2, 3,4, 5
Assistant Planner 2, 3,4, 5
Associate Civil Engineer 2, 3,4, 5
Associate Planner 2, 3,4, 5
lih:1El§et ,A.EIFfliRistFateF ~
City Clerk 1, 2
Citv Engineer 1, 2
City Planner 2, 3,4, 5
Code Compliance Officer 2, 3,4, 5
Community Outreach Coordinator 2, 3,4, 6
GeR=!Ffll:lRity aeP.iises MaRa§eF 2, J, 4, e
Construction Maintenance Supervisor 2, 3,4, 6
Contract Specialist/Inspector 2, 3,4, 6
Gl:lsteR=1eF aePJises a1::1~eP.iiseF ~
Deputy City Attorney 1, 2
Deputy City Clerk 1, 2
Deputy Fire Chief 2, 3,4, 5
Deputy Fire Marshal 2, 3, 4, 5
Director of Community Services 1, 2
Director of Development Services 1, 2
Director of Finance/ Treasurer Unlimited Disclosure
Director of Human Resources & Risk Management 1, 2
Director of Public Works 1, 2
eG0A0FfliG (;)evele~FfleAt AEIR=liAistFateF ~
Facilities Maintenance and Special Districts Supervisor 2, 3,4, 6 Finance Manager 1, 2
Fire Battalion Chief 2,3,4, 5
Fire Chief 1, 2
Fire Safety Inspector 2,3,4, 5
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 3, 6
GIS Analyst 4,6
Information Technology Analyst 3,4,6
I AfeFFflatieA +est::rnele§y MaAa§eF ~
ATTACHMENT B
9 of 11
November 15, 2022, Item #10
City Employees Position/Title Disclosure Category
Management Analyst 2,3,4, 6
Management Assistant 2, 3,4, 6
Network and Computer Systems Administrator 3,4, 6
Network & Computer Systems Analyst 3,4, 6
Parks Maintenance Supervisor 4, 6
Parks and Trails Area Manager 2, 3, 4, 6
Principal Civil Engineer - Utilities 2, 3,4, 5
Public Works Operations Manager 2, 3,4, 6
ResFeatieA S1:113eFi.1is0F J,--6
Recreation Area Manager 2, 3, 4, 6
Revenue and Operations Manager 2, 3 ,4, 6
Revenue and Operat ions Supervisor 2, 3, 4, 6
Senior Accountant 1, 2
Senior Accounting Technician 1, 2
Senior Civil Engineer 2,3,4, 5
Senior Code Compliance Officer 2,3,4, 5
Senior Fire Safety Inspector 2,3,4, 5
Senior Human Resources Analyst 2,3,4, 6
Senior Management Analyst 2,3,4,6
Senior Planner 2,3,4, 5
Special Projects Engineer 2,3,4, 5
Utilities Administrator 2,3,4,6
Utility Systems Supervisor 2,3,4,6
Warehouse Associate 3, 5
Wastewater Utilities Supervisor 2,3,4,6
WateF +FeatffieAt PlaAt S1:113ei=vis0F 2, J, 4, e
Water Treatment Plant Manager 2, 3, 4, 6
Water Utilities Distribution Supervisor 2, 3,4,6
Boards, Committees, & Commissions Disclosure Category
Budget Review Committee 1, 2
Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee 1, 2
*Poway Housing Authority Unlimited disclosure
*Public Financing Authority Unlimited disclosure
*Successor Agency to the Poway Redevelopment Agency Unlimited disclosure Mayor and Councilmembers hold the positions on the Authorities and Agency marked by * Consultants
Consultants shall be included in the list of designated employees and shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure category in this Code subject to the following limitation:
10 of 11
November 15, 2022, Item #10
The City Manager or his or her designee, may determine in writing that a particular consultant, although a "designated position," is hired to perform a range of duties that are limited in scope and thus not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements described in this Section.
Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The City Manager's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as the Conflict of Interest Code.
11 of 11
AGENDA RE PQ RT City of Poway
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Aaron Beanan, Director of Finance ,Ac,
Aaron Bea nan, Director of Finance
(858) 668-4411 or abeanan@poway .org
City's Investment Report as of September 30, 2022
CITY COUNCIL
Quarterly reports of investments are required to be presented to the City Council per state code and the City's Investment Policy. Attached is an investment portfolio report as of September 30, 2022.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council accept and file the attached report.
Discussion:
Pursuant to Government Code Sec. 53646(b)(1) and the City's Investment Policy, the Director of Finance (i.e., City Treasurer) renders a quarterly investment report to the City Council concerning the investment portfolio's earnings and performance results. In accordance with the Investment Policy, the quarterly report includes information such as the investment type, issuer, date of maturity, par value, amount invested, current market value, and the source of the market value information.
The City is in compliance with its adopted investment policy, and the City's investment program provides sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow requirements for the next six months . The fair value of the City's investment portfolio as of September 30, 2022, was $125,654,582. It consisted of the following :
Investment Portfolio Total
Cash $32,182
Deposits at CalTRUST 22,641,949
Deposits at the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 28,523,954 U. S. Treasury Notes 28,001,371
U.S. Instrumentalities 25,240,127
Corporate Notes 21,214,999
Fair Value of Investment Portfolio as of September 30, 2022 $125,654,582 1 of 30
November 15, 2022, Item #11
It is the City's practice to keep funds (including those identified to pay for Capital Improvement Projects) invested and earning interest until they are needed. In addition to changing market conditions, reductions in the fair value of the Investment Portfolio can also be reflective of payments for large capital projects as well as operational expenses. Due to year-end deadlines, there was an influx of invoices to be paid with FY 2021-22 funding in addition to the FY 2022-23 invoices through end of September 2022.
The attached portfolio report (Attachment B) and investment report (Attachment C) were prepared by the City's investment manager, Insight Investment, with input from the City's Finance Department. The portfolio report includes all investments while the investment report includes only those investments managed by Insight Investment.
All City funds, including the General Fund, Water Fund, Wastewater Fund and others - except those identified in Attachment D, are pooled and invested, with earned interest allocated quarterly based on the average daily cash balance in each fund. The funds on deposit at LAIF and CalTRUST earn interest at variable rates. The interest rate for the month ending September 30, 2022, is estimated at
1.51 % for LAIF, 2.25% for the CalTRUST short-term fund, and 1.83% for the CalTRUST medium-term fund.
For fixed income securities, the difference between amortized cost and fair value is considered an unrealized gain or loss. A realized loss is when the principal of the security is redeemed before its maturity date at a fair value lower than its amortized cost value. The amortized cost value of the externally managed investment portfolio is $76,821,895; the fair value is $74,488,679 for an unrealized loss of $2,333,216 or -3.04% of the total amortized cost value. The source of the fair value information for the U.S. Treasury Notes, the U.S. Instrumentalities, Corporate Notes, and Municipal Bonds is Interactive Data Corporation .
Also included with this report are recaps of the City's cash and investments held by fiscal agents, non managed investments, and cash on hand. The total book value of the cash and investments held by our fiscal agent, U.S. Bank, at September 30, 2022, was $496,700. The source of the market value information for these investments was U.S. Bank. The total book value of the non-managed investments was $113,832 at September 30, 2022. The City's cash on hand at September 30, 2022 totaled $5,858,785.
The September 30, 2022, balance of the City's Library Trust Fund is $261,721. Through the Fiscal Year 2022-23 period ending September 30, 2022, $628 of interest earnings has been transferred to the General Fund. The City Transfers 90% of the Library Trust Fund's interest revenue to the General Fund on an annual basis to help offset library operating costs.
Environmental Review:
This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Fiscal Impact:
The externally managed investment portfolio earned $115,610 interest during September 2022, as well as $1116,207 interest during August 2022, and $118,933 during July 2022. Fees for investment services during this period totaled $9,377.
2 of 30
November 15, 2022, Item #11
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Investment Statistics
B. Investment Portfolio Report prepared by Insight Investment C. Investment Report prepared by Insight Investment
D. City of Poway Investments and Cash with Fiscal Agent; General, Payroll, and Petty Cash Report at September 30, 2022
Reviewed/Approved By:
Assistant City Manager
3 of30
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
~
City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #11
City of Poway
Investment Statistics
Separately Managed Investment Pools
Fair Value:
CalTRUST Short-Term Deposits
CalTRUST Medium-Term Deposits
Deposits at the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
Total Fair Value
Weighted Average Yield
Effective Average Duration in days
Weighted Average Maturity in days
Externally Managed Investment Pools
Fair Value:
Cash
U. S. Treasury Notes
U. S. Instrumentalities
Corporate Bonds
Total Fair Value
Amortized Cost Value:
Cash
U. S. Treasury Notes
U. S. Instrumentalities
Corporate Bonds
Total Amortized Cost Value
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Percentage
Accrued Interest Earned
Weighted Average Yield
Effective Average Duration in years
Weighted Average Maturity in years
Total Fair Value of Portfolio Assets
Weighted Average Yield
Effective Average Duration in years
Weighted Average Maturity in years
Glossary of Yield Terminology
September June
2021 2022
11,461,249 11,378,567
11,814,225 11,396,992
22,195,881 39,558,165
45,471,355 62,333,724
0.22% 0.94%
1 1
1 1
81,833 125,352
12,826,608 28,941,906
32,891,155 25,495,080
21,359,508 20,494,106
67,159,104 75,056,444
81,833 125,352
12,622,861 29,515,931
32,427,513 25,976,196
20,957,617 20,936,821
66,089,824 76,554,301
1,069,280 (1,497,857)
1.62% -1.96%
125,208 113,057
1.55% 1.39%
1.61 1.25
1.78 1.35
112,630,459 137,390,168
1.01% 1.19%
0.96 0.68
1.06 0.74
Coupon: A bond's coupon is the periodic interest payment made to the holder of the fixed income security during the life of the bond. Coupon payments can be made monthly, quarterly, or annually.
Book Yield: The Book Yield is that rate of return that will make the present value of the future cash flows of a fixed income security equal to the price paid for the security. This assumes that the security will be held to its maturity.
Current Yield: Annual rate of return on an investment expressed as a percentage. Current Yield of a fixed income security is the annualized earnings (coupon) divided by the bond's market value as of the valuation date.
One Year Total Yield: The One Year Total Yield or One Year Return represents the portfolio's percentage change over a year's time, factoring in interest payments, changes in market value and reinvestment of distributions .
September
2022
11,409,244
11,232,705
28,523,955
51,165,904
1.75%
1 1
32,182
28,001,371
25,240,127
21,214,999
74,488,679
32,182
28,984,175
25,943 ,209
21,862,328
76,821,895
(2,333,216)
-3.04%
115,610
1.58%
1.22 1.33
125,654,583
1.65%
0.72 0.79
Weighted Average Yield: The total yield on a bond portfolio divided by the number of bonds contained in it, weighted for the size of each bond so that the yield of large holdings does not drown out the calculation of yields on small holdings.
Yield to Maturity: The Yield to Maturity (YTM) or Market Yield to Maturity of a fixed income security is that rate of interest that will make the present value of the future cash flows equal to the market value as of the valuation date, assuming the bond is held to maturity. 4 of30 ATTACHMENT A
November 15, 2022, Item #11
City of Poway
Monthly Investment Portfolio Report
September 30, 2022
Separately Managed Investment Pools % Return
LAIF $ 28,523,955 56% 1.51%
CalTrust - Short $ 11,409,244 22% 2.25%
CalTrust - Medium $ 11,232,705 22% 1.83%
Total Internally Managed $ 51,165,904 41%
Weighted Average Yield 1.75%
Days
Effective Average Duration - Internal 1
Weighted Average Maturity - Internal 1
Externally Managed Assets % Return
Cash $ 32,182 0% 0.60%
Treasury Securities $ 28,001,371 38% 1.59%
Instrumentality Securities $ 25,240,127 34% 1.34%
Corporate Notes $ 21,214,999 28% 1.85%
Total Externally Managed $ 74,488,679 59%
Weighted Average Yield 1.58%
Years
Effective Average Duration - External 1.22
Weighted Average Final Maturity - External 1.33
Total Portfolio Assets % Return
LAIF
CalTrust - Short
CalTrust - Medium
Cash
Treasury Securities
Instrumentality Securities
Corporate Notes
Total Portfolio Assets
Weighted Average Yield
Effective Average Duration - Total
Weighted Average Maturity - Total
Portfolio Change
Beginning Balance
Ending Balance
Assets values shown at Market
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
28,523,955 23% 1.51%
11,409,244 9% 2.25%
11,232,705 9% 1.83%
32,182 0% 0.60%
28,001,371 22% 1.59%
25,240,127 20% 1.34%
21,214,999 17% 1.85%
125,654,582
1.65%
Years
0.72 0.79
$
$
CalTrust -
CalTrust - Short,
22%
Corporate
Securities
26%
128,782,078
125,654,582
5 of 30 ATTACHMENT B
Cash, 0% ·
CalTrust - Short
12%
Treasury
Securities, 38%
Instrumentality
Securities, 34%
CalTrust -
Medium
Cash
0%
Securities
29%
November 15, 2022, Item #11
6 of30 ATTACHMENT C
November 15, 2022, Item #11
-.J
Contents 0 -....
w
0 Fixed income market review 3
Activity and performance summary 4
Recap of securities held 6
Maturity distribution of securities held 7
Securities held 8
GASB 40 - Deposit and investment risk disclosure 13
Securities purchased 17
Securities sold and matured 18
Detail of return and interest received 19
Transaction report 22
Additional information 23
November 15, 2022, Item #11
00 0 ....
w
0 FIXED INCOME MARKET REVIEW
As of September 30, 2022
Chart 1: The Fed's rate projections were revised up again 5 4.5
4 3.5
3 * 2.5
2 1.5
1 0.5
0 . . . . . . . . . . ................. .. ..
. .............. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . .
. ...................... .
Jan-22 Jan-23 Jan-24
• • • • • • Fed dots December 2021 • • • • • • Fed Dots March 2022 Jan-25
••••••Fed Dots June 2022 Fed Dots September 2022
Source: Federal Reserve, September 30, 2022
Chart 2: Labor market remains robust
25 20
..., 15
C
~
~ 10
5 0
Sep-18 Mar-19 Sep-19 Mar-20 Sep-20 Mar-21 Sep-21 Mar-22 Sep-22 --Continuing jobless claims (seasonally adjusted)
--Initial jobless claims (seasonally adjusted)
Source: Bloomberg, September 30, 2022
CITY OF POWAY
Economic Indicators and Monetary Policy
The Fed announced a third consecutive 75bp rate hike, bringing the fed funds rate to a range of 3% to 3.25% and it continued to set a hawkish tone. It raised its dot plot to reflect policy rates at 4.375% by year-end (up 88bp from the projection in June and 188bp higher than in March - see Chart 1 ). This implies another 125bp of hikes yet for the final two meetings of the year. The Fed materially cut its growth forecasts for 2022 and 2023 to 0.2% and 1.2% from 1.7% and 1.7%, respectively. It also projects the unemployment rate will rise to 4.4% by the end of next year from 3.7% today.
Inflation made less progress than markets had hoped, falling from 8.5% to only 8.3% (where ~8.1 % was expected). Core CPI was particularly disappointing, rising from 5.9% to 6.3%, narrowly below the recent peak of 6.5% in March. 'Flexible' categories like gasoline continued to reverse, but 'sticky' services sectors like rents and medical prices continued to be high.
Labor market data remained robust. The economy added 315,000 jobs, close to consensus estimates with broad-based gains, albeit the previous two months were revised down. Wage growth was largely in line with expectations at 5.2%. The unemployment rate ticked up to 3.7% from 3.5%, more than expected, but this was partly a result of the labor participation rate rising from 62.1 % from 62.4%. Initial jobless claims reached the lowest levels since April on a seasonally adjusted basis, at 193,000 at the end of the month . Continuing jobless claims saw four straight weeks of declines (Chart 2).
Real GDP for Q2 2022 was unrevised at -0.6%, albeit the mix changed with real consumer spending revised up from 1.5% pa to 2% pa. Revisions back to 2017 showed the economy growing 3.5% since 2019, above the 2. 9% previously estimated, indica'ting a significantly hotter economy than previously indicated .
Interest Rate Summary
Yields generally rose sharply during the month, given the Federal Reserve's hawkish projections . At the end of September, the 3-month US Treasury bill yielded 3.29%, the 6-month US Treasury bill yielded 3.97%, the 2-year US Treasury note yielded 4.28%, the 5-year US Treasury note yielded 4.09% and the 10-year US Treasury note yielded
3.84%.
3 November 15, 2022, Item #11
ID
0 ACTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
For the period September 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022
~ I Amortized Cost Basis Activity Summary
0 Opening balance
Income received
Total receipts
Total disbursements
lnterportfolio transfers
Total lnterportfollo transfers
Realized gain (loss)
Change in accruals from security movement
Total amortization expense
Total 01D/MKT accretion Income
Return of capital
Closing balance
Ending fair value
Unrealized gain (loss)
139,878.33
0.00 CQmparative Bates Qf Beturn 1%}
Fed Funds
Overnight Repo
Merrill Lynch 3m US Treas Bill
Merrill Lynch 6m US Treas Bill
ML 1 Year US Treasury Note
ML 2 Year US Treasury Note
ML 5 Year US Treasury Note
* rates reflected are cumulative
*Twelve
month trailing
0.79 0.74
0.97 1.25
1.68 2.01
2.24 * Six
month trailing
0.74 0.
71 0.89
1.10 1.39
1.52 1.49
76,700,953.82
139,878.33
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
(44,927.27)
25,989.18
0.00 76,821,894 .06
74,488,678.70
(2,333,215.36)
* One month
0.21 0.20
0.24 0.28
0.31 0.31
0.25 -··-- --
Detail Qf 8mQr:tized CQSt Basis Beturn
Interest Accretion Realized
earned (amortization) gain (loss)
Cash and Cash Equivalents 540.83 0.00 0.00
Corporate Bonds 53,676.72 (21,292.74) 0.00
Government Agencies 39,205.57 (11,069.96) 0.00
Government Bonds 22,187.12 13,424.61 0.00
Total 115,610.24 (18,938.09) 0.00
summary Qf 8mQr:tized CQst Basis Bet!.!ro for the PeriQd Interest earned
Accretion (amortization)
Realized gain (loss) on sales
Total income on portfolio
Average daily amortized cost
Period return (%)
YTD return (%)
Weighted average final maturity in days
CITY OF POWAY
Total
income
540.83
32,383.98
28,135.61
35,611.73
96,672.15
Total portfolio
115,610.24
(18,938.09)
0.00 96,672.15
76,779,946.18
0.13 1.04
484
4 November 15, 2022, Item #11
....
0 ACTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Forthe period September 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022
~ I Fair Value Basis Activity Summary
o Opening balance 74,969,040.36
Income received
Total receipts
Total disbursements
lnterportfolio transfers
Total lnterportfollo transfers
Unrealized gain (loss) on security movements
Change in accruals from security movement
Return of capital
Change in fair value for the period
Ending fair value
139,878.33
0.00 CQmparnti~e Bates Qf Beturn !~l
*Twelve * Six
month trailing month trailing
Fed Funds 0.79 0.74
Overnight Repo 0.74 0.71
ICE Bola 3 Months UST-BILL 0.62 0.57
ICE Bola 6m US Treas Bill 0.39 0.47
ICE Bola 1 Yr US Treasury Note (1.95) (0.97)
ICE BofA US Treasury 1-3 (4.86) (2.06)
ICE BofA US Treasury 1-5 (6.78) (3.07)
* rates reflected are cumulative
139,878.33
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 (620,239.99)
74,488,678.70
* One month
0.21 0.20
0.25 0.15
(0.44)
(1.18)
(1.70)
Detail Qf Eair Vah.1e Basis Beturn
Interest Change in
earned fair value
Cash and Cash Equivalents 540.83 0.00
Corporate Bonds 53,676 .72 (217,595 .91)
Government Agencies 39,205.57 (136,795.61)
Government Bonds 22,187.12 (265,848.47)
Total 115,610.24 (620,239.99)
summary Qf Eair value Basis Beturn for the PeriQd
Interest earned
Change in fair value
Total income on portfolio
Average daily total value*
Period return (%)
YTD return (%)
Weighted average final maturity in days
* Total value equals market value and accrued interest
CITY OF POWAY
Total
income
540.83
(163,919.19)
(97,590.04)
(243,661.35)
(504,629.75)
Total portfolio
115,610 .24
(620,239.99)
(504,629.75)
75,107,527.95
(0.67)
(2.85)
484
5 November 15, 2022, Item #11
--0 ....
w
0 RECAP OF SECURITIES HELD
As .of September 30, 2022
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Corporate Bonds
Government Agencies
Government Bonds
IJI{ •_
Historical
cost
32,181 .50
Amortized
cost
32,181.50
Fair value
32,181.50
22,472,738.00 21,862,328.38 21,214,999.20
26,342,914.56 25,943,208.83 25,240,126.82
28,994,289.24 28,984,175.35 28,001,371 .18
Unrealized
gain (loss)
0.00 (647,329.18)
(703,082.01)
(982,804.17)
mmmm>
Weighted Percent
average of
final portfolio
maturity (days)
508
332
604
0.04 28.87
33.84 37.25
Portfolio diversification (%)
■ Cash and Cash Equivalents
■ Corporate Bonds
■ GovernmentAgencies
■ Government Bonds
Total
0.04 28.87
33.84 37.25
100.00
Weighted
average
effective
duration (years)
0.00 1.12
0.88 1.60
CITY OF POWAY
6 November 15, 2022, Item #11
...
"' 0 ....
w
0 MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2022
Maturity
Under 90 days
90 to 179 days
180 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Historic cost Percent
7,055,906.94 9.06
9,084,872.50 11.67
12,348,686.77 15.86
31,806,004.30 40.86
13,110,773.20 16.84
4,435,879.59 5.70
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
77,842, 123.30 100.00
E .s .... "' 0 u
ra u ·;::
0 ti
:i:
35.00 Maturity distribution
✓ ✓ ~ # ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..::,v cf> o'l> 0
'bl:)
"'
CITY OF POWAY
7 November 15, 2022, Item #11
SECURITIES HELD
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022 ... w
g,cusip Description Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cost Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized Total % w Call date shares gain accrued Port 0
(loss) interest cost
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents 0.000 32,181.50 32,181.50 32,181 .50 32,181 .50 0.00 0.00 0.04 Total Cash and Cash Equivalents 32,181 .50 32,181.50 32,181.50 32,181.50 0.00 Corporate Bonds
89233P7F7 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 2.625% 1 OJAN2023 2.625 01/10/2023 2,000 ,000.00 2,001,380.00 2,000,104.94 1,991,435.72 (8,669.22) 11,666.67 2.57 084670BR8 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 2.75% 15MAR2023 2.750 03/15/2023 1,000,000.00 1,021,370.00 1,001,785 .08 994,592.62 (7,192.46) 1,145.83 1.31 (CALLABLE 15JAN23) 01/15/2023
931142DH3 WALMART INC 2.55% 11 APR2023 (CALLABLE 11 JAN23) 2.550 04/11/2023 1,000,000.00 1,015,270.00 1,001,230.86 990,977.95 (10,252.91) 11,970 .83 1.30 01/11/2023
037833AK6 APPLE INC 2.4% 03MAY2023 2.400 05/03/2023 1,000,000.00 1,007,920.00 1,001,244.99 989,070.83 (12,174 .16) 9,800 .00 1.29 69353RFL7 PNC BANK NA 3.5% 08JUN2023 (CALLABLE 09MAY23) 3.500 06/08/2023 1,900,000.00 1,995,436.00 1,915,521.95 1,889,166.64 (26,355.31) 20,688.89 2.56 05/09/2023
17325FAS7 CITIBANK NA 3.65% 23JAN2024 (CALLABLE 23DEC23) 3.650 01/23/2024 1,400,000.00 1,484,224.00 1,426 ,183.32 1,380,805 .31 (45,378 .01) 9,510 .28 1.91 12/23/2023
91159HHV5 US BANCORP 3.375% 05FEB2024 (CALLABLE 05JAN24) 3.375 02/05/2024 1,900,000.00 1,999,636.00 1,929,457 .04 1,867,306 .05 (62,150.99) 9,796.88 2.57 01/05/2024
17275RAN2 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.625% 04MAR2024 3.625 03/04/2024 1,000,000.00 1,070,370.00 1,024,177.93 987,221.26 {36,956.67) 2,618.06 1.38 06051GHF9 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.55% 05MAR2024 (CALLABLE 3.550 03/05/2024 2,350,000.00 2,488,495.00 2,378,331.21 2,331,508.72 (46,822.49) 5,793.40 3.20 05MAR23) 03/05/2023
459200JY8 IBM CORP 3% 15MAY2024 3.000 05/15/2024 2,300,000.00 2,463,231.00 2,384,355 .24 2,237,164 .30 (147,190.94) 25,875.00 3.16 8 November 15, 2022, Item #11
SECURITIES HELD
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022 .....
.i:,.
g,cusip Description Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cost Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized Total % w Call date shares gain accrued Port
0 (loss) interest cost
Corporate Bonds
02665WCZ2 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 2.4% 27 JUN2024 2.400 06/27/2024 1,000,000.00 1,012,410.00 1,004,753.25 960,463.79 (44,289.46) 6,200.00 1.30 46647PAY2 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 4.023% 05DEC2024 (CALLABLE 4.023 12/05/2024 2,000,000.00 2,207,640.00 2,078,511.57 1,967,930.34 (110,581.23) 25,702.50 2.84 05DEC23) 12/05/2023
166764BW9 CHEVRON CORP 1.554% 11 MAY2025 (CALLABLE 1.554 05/11/2025 1,800,000.00 1,715,436.00 1,726,455.89 1,663,067.86 (63,388.03) 10,800.30 2.20 11APR25) 04/11/2025
24422ETC3 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 3.4% 11 SEP2025 3 .400 09/11/2025 1,000,000.00 989,920.00 990,215.11 964,287.81 (25,927.30) 1,794.44 1.27 Total Corporate Bonds 21,650,000.00 22,472,738.00 21,862,328.38 21,214,999.20 (647,329.18) 153,363.08 28.87 Government Agencies
3133EA5E4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 1. 93% 18OCT2022 1. 930 10/18/2022 2,000,000.00 2,015,820.00 2,000,284.76 1,998,905.08 (1,379.68) 17,370.00 2.59 31331K3A6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.71 % 13DEC2022 2.710 12/13/2022 1,000,000.00 1,028,921.06 1,001,698.50 998,213.57 (3,484.93) 8,054.72 1.32 31331KAF7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.09% 18JAN2023 4.090 01/18/2023 1,850,000.00 2,008,452.50 1,864,003.99 1,854,347.24 (9,656.75) 15,133.00 2.58 3133EKKT2 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.25% 08FEB2023 2.250 02/08/2023 1,000,000.00 1,017,480.00 1,001,709.27 995,521.87 (6,187.40) 3,250.00 1.31 3130AJ7E3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1.375% 17FEB2023 1.375 02/17/2023 2,000,000.00 2,003,400.00 2,001,374.04 1,982,477.38 (18,896.66) 3,284.72 2.57 3133EJFK0 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.65% 08MAR2023 2.650 03/08/2023 1,000,000.00 1,032,790.00 1,004,253.55 995,888.12 (8,365.43) 1,619.44 1.33 3133EMF31 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.125% 02JUN2023 0.125 06/02/2023 2,000,000.00 1,968,700.00 1,982,940.09 1,946,344.66 (36,595.43) 819.44 2.53 9 November 15, 2022, Item #11
SECURITIES HELD
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022 .... u,
!a,Cusip Description Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cost Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized Total % w Call date shares gain accrued Port 0
(loss) interest cost
Government Agencies
3137EAEN5 FREDDIE MAC 2.75% 19JUN2023 2.750 06/19/2023 2,000,000.00 2,067,740.00 2,012,434.20 1,978,254 .26 (34,179 .94) 15,430.56 2.66 3135GOU43 FANNIE MAE 2.875% 12SEP2023 2.875 09/12/2023 1,000,000.00 1,039,050.00 1,008,891.54 985,671.68 (23,219.86) 1,437.50 1.33 3133EKVB9 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 1.86% 170CT2023 1.860 10/17/2023 2,000,000.00 1,997,646.00 1,999,419.58 1,951,357.76 (48,061.82) 16,843.33 2.57 3133EJ2B4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3% 06DEC2023 3.000 12/06/2023 1,000,000.00 1,071,740.00 1,031,604.18 984,312.49 (47,291.69) 9,500.00 1.38 3130A3VC5 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.25% 08DEC2023 2.250 12/08/2023 1,000,000 .00 1,014,600.00 1,003,980.13 976,654.04 (27,326.09) 7,000.00 1.30 3135GOV34 FANNIE MAE 2.5% 05FEB2024 2.500 02/05/2024 1,750,000.00 1,820,547.50 1,780,051.45 1,707,531 .60 (72,519.85) 6,684.03 2.34 3133EMRZ7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.25% 26FEB2024 0.250 02/26/2024 1,250,000 .00 1,246,747.50 1,248,303.34 1,182 ,166.85 (66,136.49) 295.14 1.60 3133EMBE1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.3% 28MAR2024 0.300 03/28/2024 2,000,000.00 1,998,500.00 1,999,358.51 1,878,392 .22 (120,966.29) 33.33 2.57 (CALLABLE 130CT22)
3135GOV75 FANNIE MAE 1.75% 02JUL2024 1.750 07/02/2024 2,000,000.00 2,007,920.00 2,002,901.70 1,914,841.50 (88,060.20) 8,555.56 2.58 3130AL2A1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.5% 1 OFEB2025 0.500 02/10/2025 1,000,000.00 1,002,860.00 1,000,000.00 909,246.50 (90,753.50) 694.44 1.29 (CALLABLE 1 ONOV22) 11/10/2022
Total Government Agencies 25,850,000.00 26,342,914.56 25,943,208.83 25,240,126. 82 (703,082.01) 116,005.21 33.84 ~
Government Bonds
91282CAR2 USA TREASURY 0.125% 31 OCT2022 0.125 10/31/2022 2,000,000 .00 1,990,859.38 1,998,799 .33 1,995,973 .66 (2,825.67) 1,039.40 2.56 10 November 15, 2022, Item #11
SECURITIES HELD
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022 ....
O'I
g,cusip Description Coupon Matur ity/ Par value or Historical cost Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized Total % w Call date shares gain accrued Port
0 (loss) interest cost
Government Bonds
91282CAX9 USA TREASURY 0.125% 30NOV2022 0.125 11/30/2022 2,000,000.00 1,988,125.00 1,997,276.79 1,990,327.22 (6,949.57) 833.33 2.55 91282CCN9 USA TREASURY 0.12S% 31 JUL2023 0.125 07/31/2023 1,300,000.00 1,287,461.39 1,293,265.48 1,256,531.25 (36,734.23) 269.36 1.65 912828201 USA TREASURY 1.375% 31 AUG2023 1.375 08/31/2023 2,000,000.00 1,967,109.38 1,992,673.96 1,947,812.50 [44,861.46) 2,279.01 2.53 91282CDA6 USA TREASURY 0.25% 30SEP2023 0.250 09/30/2023 1,500,000.00 1,485,761 .72 1,491,724.57 1,440,703.13 [51,021.44) 0.00 1.91 912828T91 USA TREASURY 1.625% 31 OCT2023 1.625 10/31/2023 1,600,000.00 1,640,630.36 1,621,510.19 1,554,750 .00 (66,760.19) 10,809.78 2.11 912828U57 USA TREASURY 2.125% 30NOV2023 2.125 11/30/2023 1,900,000.00 1,925,679 .69 1,906,858.65 1,853,984.38 (52,874 .27) 13,458.33 2.47 9128285P1 USA TREASURY 2.875% 30NOV2023 2.875 11/30/2023 1,100,000.00 1,151,566.19 1,130,050.89 1,081,910.16 (48,140.73) 10,541.67 1.48 91282CBEO USA TREASURY 0.125% 15JAN2024 0.125 01/15/2024 1,900,000.00 1,890,283.71 1,894,487.87 1,800,917.96 (93,569.91) 496.94 2.43 912828X70 USA TREASURY 2% 30APR2024 2.000 04/30/2024 2,000,000.00 2,036,015.63 2,012,413.26 1,929 ,140.62 (83,272.64) 16,630.44 2.62 912828YH7 USA TREASURY 1.5% 30SEP2024 1.500 09/30/2024 1,000 ,000.00 1,032,304.69 1,020,606.22 948,007.81 (72,598.41) 0.00 1.33 912828YM6 USA TREASURY 1.5% 31 OCT2024 1.500 10/31/2024 1,100,000.00 1,132,015.40 1,121,627.42 1,040,187 .50 (81,439 .92) 6,860.05 1.45 912828YYO USA TREASURY 1.75% 31 DEC2024 1.750 12/31/2024 1,000,000.00 1,046,643.98 1,029,506.53 947,500.00 [82,006.53) 4,398.91 1.34 11 November 15, 2022, Item #11
SECURITIES HELD
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022 ....
-.J
g,cusip Description Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cost Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized Total % w Call date shares gain accrued Port
0 (loss) interest cost
Government Bonds
912828ZL7 USA TREASURY 0.375% 30APR2025 0.375 04/30/2025 2,900,000.00 2,704,703.13 2,735,420.06 2,626,878.90 (108,541.16) 4,521.40 3.47 91282CAJ0 USA TREASURY 0.25% 31 AUG2025 0.250 08/31/2025 1,400,000.00 1,279,250.00 1,289,511.16 1,247,148.43 (42,362.73) 290.06 1.64 91282CAT8 USA TREASURY 0.25% 31 OCT2025 0.250 10/31/2025 1,200,000.00 1,086,046.88 1,089,193.13 1,062,703.13 (26,490.00) 1,247.28 1.40 91282CBC4 USA TREASURY 0.375% 31 DEC2025 0.375 12/31/2025 2,300,000.00 2,106,124.89 2,115,297.81 2,033,792.96 (81,504.85) 2,156.25 2.71 91282CBT7 USA TREASURY 0. 75% 31 MAR2026 0.750 03/31/2026 1,400,000.00 1,243,707.82 1,243,952.03 1,243,101.57 (850.46) 0.00 1.60 Total Government Bonds 29,600,000.00 28,994,289.24 28,984,175.35 28,001,371.18 (982,804.17) 75,832.21 37.25 fmii:..111:~
12 November 15, 2022, Item #11
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022 ....
00 g,cusip Description Coupon Maturity Call date S&P Moody Par value or Historical % Portfolio Market % Portfolio Effective w
0 date rating rating shares cost hist cost value mkt value dur (yrs) United States Treasury Note/Bond
91282CAR2 USA TREASURY 0.125% 0.125 10/31/2022 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,990,859.38 2.56 1,995,973.66 2.68 0.08 91282CAX9 USA TREASURY 0.125% 0.125 11/30/2022 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,988, 125.00 2.SS 1,990,327 .22 2.67 0.17 91282CCN9 USA TREASURY 0.125% 0.125 07/31/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,300,000 .00 1,287,461 .39 1.65 1 ,256,531.25 1.69 0.82 9128282D1 USA TREASURY 1.375% 1.375 08/31/2023 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,967,109 .38 2.53 1,947,812 .50 2.61 0.90 91282CDA6 USA TREASURY 0.25% 0.250 09/30/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,500,000.00 1,485,761.72 1.91 1,440,703.13 1.93 0.98 912828T91 USA TREASURY 1.625% 1.625 10/31/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,600,000.00 1,640,630 .36 2.11 1,554,750.00 2.09 1.05 912828U57 USA TREASURY 2.125% 2.125 11/30/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,900,000.00 1,925,679.69 2.47 1,853,984 .38 2.49 1.13 9128285P1 USA TREASURY 2.875% 2.875 11/30/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,100,000.00 1,151,566.19 1.48 1,081,910.16 1.45 1.12 91282CBEO USA TREASURY 0.12S% 0.125 01/15/2024 AA+ Aaa 1,900,000.00 1,890,283.71 2.43 1,800,917.96 2.42 1.27 912828X70 USA TREASURY 2% 2.000 04/30/2024 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 2,036,015.63 2.62 1,929,140 .62 2.59 1.52 912828YH7 USA TREASURY 1.5% 1.500 09/30/2024 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,032,304.69 1.33 948,007.81 1.27 1.93 912828YM6 USA TREASURY 1.5% 1.500 10/31/2024 AA+ Aaa 1,100,000.00 1,132,015.40 1.45 1 ,040, 187 .50 1.40 2.00 912828YYO USA TREASURY 1.75% 1.750 12/31/2024 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,046,643.98 1.34 947,500.00 1.27 2.16 912828ZL7 USA TREASURY 0.375% 0.375 04/30/2025 AA+ Aaa 2,900,000 .00 2,704,703.13 3.47 2,626,878.90 3.53 2.51 91282CAJO USA TREASURY 0.25% 0.250 08/31/2025 AA+ Aaa 1,400,000.00 1,279,250.00 1.64 1 ,247, 148.43 1.67 2.84 91282CAT8 USA TREASURY 0.25% 0.250 10/31/2025 AA+ Aaa 1 ,200,000.00 1,086,046.88 1.40 1,062,703.13 1.43 3.00 91282CBC4 USA TREASURY 0.375% 0.375 12/31/2025 AA+ Aaa 2,300,000.00 2,106 , 124.89 2.71 2,033,792 .96 2.73 3.16 91282CBT7 USA TREASURY 0.75% 0.750 03/31/2026 AA+ Aaa 1,400,000.00 1,243,707 .82 1.60 1,243,101.57 1.67 3.38 Issuer total 29,600,000.00 28,994,289.24 37.25 28,001,371.18 37.59 1.60 Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corp
3133EASE4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 1.930 10/18/2022 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 2,015,820.00 2.59 1,998,905.08 2.68 0.05 31331 K3A6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 2.710 12/13/2022 AA+ Aaa 1 ,000,000.00 1,028,921.06 1.32 998,213.57 1.34 0.20 31331KAF7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 4.090 01/18/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,850,000.00 2,008,452.50 2.58 1,854,347.24 2.49 0.30 3133EKKT2 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 2.250 02/08/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,017,480.00 1.31 995,521.87 1.34 0.35 13 November 15, 2022, Item #11
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022 ...
1.0 g,cusip Description Coupon Maturity Call date S&P Moody Par value or Historical % Portfolio Market % Portfolio Effective w date rating 0 rating shares cost hist cost value mkt value dur (yrs) Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corp
3133EJFKO FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 2.650 03/08/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,032,790.00 1.33 995,888.12 1.34 0.43 3133EMF31 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 0.125 06/02/2023 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,968,700.00 2.53 1,946,344.66 2.61 0.66 3133EKVB9 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 1.860 10/17/2023 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,997,646.00 2.57 1,951,357.76 2.62 1.01 3133EJ2B4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 3.000 12/06/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,071,740.00 1.38 984,312.49 1.32 1.14 3133EMRZ7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 0.250 02/26/2024 AA+ Aaa 1,250,000.00 1,246,747.50 1.60 1 , 182, 166.85 1.59 1.38 3133EMBE1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 0.300 03/28/2024 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 1,998,500.00 2.57 1 ,878,392.22 2.52 1.44 Issuer total 15,100,000.00 15,386,797.06 19.77 14,785,449.86 19.85 0.70 Federal National Mortgage Association
3135GOU43 FANNIE MAE 2.875% 2.875 09/12/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,039,050.00 1.33 985,671.68 1.32 0.92 3135GOV34 FANNIE MAE 2.5% 2.500 02/05/2024 AA+ Aaa 1,750,000.00 1,820,547.50 2.34 1,707,531.60 2.29 1.30 3135GOV75 FANNIE MAE 1.75% 1.750 07/02/2024 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 2,007,920.00 2.58 1,914,841.50 2.57 1.69 Issuer total 4,750,000.00 4,867,517.50 6.25 4,608,044.78 6.19 1.38 Federal Home Loan Banks
3130AJ7E3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 1.375 02/17/2023 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 2,003,400.00 2.57 1,982,477.38 2.66 0.38 3130A3VC5 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 2.250 12/08/2023 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,014,600.00 1.30 976,654.04 1.31 1.15 3130AL2A1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 0.500 02/10/2025 11/10/2022 AA+ Aaa 1,000,000.00 1,002,860.00 1.29 909,246.50 1.22 2.28 Issuer total 4,000,000.00 4,020,860.00 5.17 3,868,377.92 5.19 1.05 Bank of America Corp
06051GHF9 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.550 03/05/2024 03/05/2023 A- A2 2,350,000.00 2,488,495.00 3.20 2,331 ,508. 72 3.13 0.42 Issuer total 2,350,000.00 2,488,495.00 3.20 2,331,508.72 3.13 0.42 International Business Machines Corp
459200JY8 IBM CORP3% 3.000 05/15/2024 A- A3 2,300,000.00 2,463,231.00 3.16 2,237,164.30 3.00 1.54 Issuer total 2,300,000.00 2,463,231.00 3.16 2,237,164.30 3.00 1.54 14 November 15, 2022, Item #11
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022
N
0 2,cusip Description Coupon Maturity Call date S&P Moody Par value or Historical % Portfolio Market % Portfolio Effective w date rating rating shares 0 cost hist cost value mkt value dur (yrs) Toyota Motor Credit Corp
89233P7F7 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 2.625 01/10/2023 A+ A1 2,000,000.00 2,001,380.00 2.57 1,991,435.72 2.67 0.28 Issuer total 2,000,000.00 2,001,380.00 2.57 1,991,435.72 2.67 0.28 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
3137EAEN5 FREDDIE MAC 2.75% 2.750 06/19/2023 AA+ Aaa 2,000,000.00 2,067,740.00 2.66 1,978,254.26 2.66 0.70 Issuer total 2,000,000.00 2,067,740.00 2.66 1 , 978,254.26 2.66 0.70 JPMorgan Chase & Co
46647PAY2 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 4.023 12/05/2024 12/05/2023 A- A1 2,000,000.00 2,207,640.00 2.84 1,967,930.34 2.64 1.12 Issuer total 2,000,000.00 2,207,640.00 2.84 1,967,930.34 2.64 1.12 PNC Bank NA
69353RFL7 PNC BANK NA 3.5% 3.500 06/08/2023 05/09/2023 A A2 1,900,000.00 1,995,436.00 2.56 1,889,166.64 2.54 0.66 Issuer total 1,900,000.00 1,995,436.00 2.56 1,889,166.64 2.54 0.66 US Bancorp
91159HHV5 US BANCORP 3.375% 3.375 02/05/2024 01/05/2024 A+ A2 1,900,000.00 1,999,636.00 2.57 1,867,306.05 2.51 1.28 Issuer total 1,900,000.00 1,999,636.00 2.57 1,867,306.05 2.51 1.28 Chevron Corp
166764BW9 CHEVRON CORP 1.554% 1.554 05/11/2025 04/11/2025 AA- Aa2 1,800,000.00 1,715,436.00 2.20 1,663,067.86 2.23 2.48 Issuer total 1,800,000.00 1,715,436.00 2.20 1,663,067.86 2.23 2.48 Citibank NA
17325FAS7 CITIBANK NA 3.65% 3.650 01/23/2024 12/23/2023 A+ Aa3 1,400,000.00 1,484,224.00 1.91 1,380,805.31 1.85 1.24 Issuer total 1 ,400,000.00 1 ,484,224.00 1.91 1,380,805.31 1.85 1.24 -·- - ·- -·-~---· -- -·- -- --
15 November 15, 2022, Item #11
GASB 40 - DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT RISK DISCLOSURE
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022
N ....
g,cusip Description Coupon Maturity Call date S&P Moody Par value or Historical % Portfolio Market % Portfolio Effective w date rating rating shares cost hist cost value mkt value dur (yrs) 0 Berkshire Hathaway Inc
084670BR8 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 2.750 03/15/2023 01/15/2023 AA Aa2 1 ,000,000.00 1,021,370.00 1.31 994,592.62 1.34 0.44 Issuer total 1 ,000,000.00 1,021,370.00 1.31 994,592.62 1.34 0.44 Walmart Inc
931142DH3 WALMART INC 2.55% 2.550 04/11/2023 01/11/2023 AA Aa2 1,000,000.00 1,015,270.00 1.30 990,977.95 1.33 0.51 Issuer total 1,000,000.00 1,015,270.00 1.30 990,977.95 1.33 0.51 Apple Inc
037833AK6 APPLE INC 2.4% 2.400 05/03/2023 AA+ Aaa 1 ,000,000.00 1,007,920.00 1.29 989,070.83 1.33 0.57 Issuer total 1 ,000,000.00 1 ,007, 920.00 1.29 989,070.83 1.33 0.57 Cisco Systems Inc
17275RAN2 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.625 03/04/2024 AA- A1 1,000,000.00 1,070,370.00 1.38 987,221.26 1.33 1.37 Issuer total 1 ,000,000.00 1 ,070,370.00 1.38 987,221.26 1.33 1.37 John Deere Capital Corp
24422ETC3 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL 3.400 09/11/2025 A A2 1,000,000.00 989,920.00 1.27 964,287.81 1.29 2.75 Issuer total 1 ,000,000.00 989,920.00 1.27 964,287.81 1.29 2.75 American Honda Finance Corp
02665WCZ2 AMERICAN HONDA 2.400 06/27/2024 A- A3 1,000,000.00 1,012,410.00 1.30 960,463.79 1.29 1.67 Issuer total 1 ,000,000.00 1 ,012,41 0.00 1.30 960,463.79 1.29 1.67 Cash and Cash Equivalents
INVESTED CASH 0.000 32,181.50 32,181.50 0.00 32,181.50 0.04 0.00 Issuer total 32,181.50 32,181.50 0.00 32,181.50 0.04 0.00 16 November 15, 2022, Item #11
N
N
SECURITIES PURCHASED
For the period September 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022
g,cusip Description/ Broker Trade date Coupon Maturity/ w Settle date Call date
0 Government Bonds
91282CBT7 USA TREASURY 0.75% 31 MAR2026
WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC
Total Government Bonds
09/28/2022
09/30/2022
0.750 03/31/2026
Par value or
shares
1,400,000.00
1,400,000.00
Unit cost
88.84 Principal
cost
(1,243,707.82)
(1,243,707.82)
CITY OF POWAY
Accrued
interest
0.00 0.00
17 November 15, 2022, Item #11
N w
SECURITIES SOLD AND MATURED
For the period September 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022
!a_ Cusip Description/ Broker Trade date Coupon Maturity/ Par value or Historical cost w Settle date Call date shares
0 Government Bonds
912828L57 USA TREASURY 1.75% 30SEP2022 09/30/2022 1.750 (1 ,000,000.00) 999,417.41 09/30/2022
Total (Government Bonds) (1 ,000,000.00) 999,417.41
Amortized cost
at sale or
maturity
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
Price
0.00 Fair value at
sale or
maturity
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
CITY OF POWAY
Realized
gain
(loss)
0.00 0.00
Accrued
interest
sold
0.00 0.00
IX'11
18 November 15, 2022, Item #11
DETAIL OF RETURN AND INTEREST RECEIVED
CITY OF POWAY
For the period September 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022
"' :,,.
g,cusip Description Accretion Realized gain Change in fair Interest earned Interest received w (amortization)
0 (loss) value
--
Cash
Cash and Cash Equivalents 0.00 0.00 0.00 540.83 540.83
~
Total Cash 0.00 0.00 0.00 540.83 540.83
-- --
Corporate Bonds
02665WCZ2 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 2.4% 27JUN2024 (227.43) 0.00 (1 4,677.26) 1,933.33 0.00 037833AK6 APPLE INC 2.4% 03MAY2023 (175.35) 0.00 (4,041.75) 1,933.33 0.00 06051GHF9 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.55% 05MAR2024 (CALLABLE 05MAR23) (5,483.46) 0.00 (8,985.65) 6,720.34 41,712.50 084670BR8 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 2.75% 1 SMAR2023 (CALLABLE 15JAN23) (510.03) 0.00 (3,646.82) 2,215.27 13,750.00 166764BW9 CHEVRON CORP 1.554% 11 MAY2025 (CALLABLE 11 APR25) 2,344.66 0.00 (35,413.67) 2,253.30 0.00 17275RAN2 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.625% 04MAR2024 (1,411.16) 0.00 (15,064.24) 2,920.14 18,125.00 17325FAS7 CITIBANK NA 3.65% 23JAN2024 (CALLABLE 23DEC23) (1,773.14) 0.00 (16,884.07) 4,116.39 0.00 459200JY8 IBM CORP 3% 15MAY2024 (4,325.91) 0.00 (34,510.81) 5,558.33 0.00 24422ETC3 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 3.4% 11 SEP2025 276.67 0.00 (22,811.66) 2,738.88 17,000.00 46647PAY2 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 4.023% 05DEC2024 (CALLABLE 05DEC23) (5,541.99) 0.00 (22,999.36) 6,481.50 0.00 69353RFL7 PNC BANK NA 3.5% 08JUN2023 (CALLABLE 09MAY23) (2,126.29) 0.00 (9,451.76) 5,356.95 0.00 89233P7F7 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 2.625% 1 OJAN2023 (31.49) 0.00 (2,627.64) 4,229.17 0.00 91159HHV5 US BANCORP 3.375% 05FEB2024 (CALLABLE 05JAN24) (1,942.22) 0.00 (23,437.17) 5,165.63 0.00 931142DH3 WALMART INC 2.55% 11APR2023 (CALLABLE 11JAN23) (365.60) 0.00 (3,044.05) 2,054.16 0.00 - - -
Total Corporate Bonds (21,292 .74) 0.00 (217,595.91) 53,676.72 90,587.50 -
Government Agencies
3135GOV75 FANNIE MAE 1.75% 02JUL2024 (137.74) 0.00 (25,546.08) 2,819.45 0.00 19 November 15, 2022, Item #11
DETAIL OF RETURN AND INTEREST RECEIVED
CITY OF POWAY
For the period September 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022
N u,
g,cusip Description Accretion Realized gain Change in fair Interest earned Interest received w (amortization) (loss) value
0 Government Agencies
3135GOV34 FANNIE MAE 2.5% 05FEB2024 (1 ,858.86) 0.00 {19,854.66) 3,524.31 0.00 3135GOU43 FANNIE MAE 2.875% 12SEP2023 {779.96) 0.00 {6,956.48) 2,315.97 14,375.00 3133EMF31 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.125% 02JUN2023 2,114.86 0.00 {2,547.26) 201.38 0.00 3133EMRZ7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.25% 26FEB2024 100.60 0.00 (7,834.59) 251.74 0.00 3133EMBE1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.3% 28MAR2024 {CALLABLE 130CT22) 35.78 0.00 {16,561.44) 483.33 3,000.00 3133EKVB9 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 1.86% 170CT2023 46.18 0.00 {12,150.08) 2,996.66 0.00 3133EA5E4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 1.93% 180CT2022 (474.60) 0.00 2,047.14 3,109.44 0.00 3133EKKT2 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.2S% 08FEB2023 (400.62) 0.00 {805.07) 1,812.50 0.00 3133EJFKO FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.65% 08MAR2023 (807.63) 0.00 {1 ,873.07) 2,134.72 13,250.00 31331K3A6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.71 % 13DEC2022 (698.02) 0.00 (712.18) 2,183.05 0.00 3133EJ2B4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3% 06DEC2023 (2,299.83) 0.00 (8,132.39) 2,416.67 0.00 31331KAF7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.09% 18JAN2023 {3,889.99) 0.00 {3,538.05) 6,095.24 0.00 3130AL2A1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.5% 1 OFEB2025 (CALLABLE 1 ONOV22) 0.00 0.00 {14,50005) 402.77 0.00 3130AJ7E3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1.375% 17FEB2023 {300.89) 0.00 {2,516.96) 2,215.28 0.00 3130A3VCS FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.25% 08DEC2023 {278.98) 0.00 {6,809.51) 1,812.50 0.00 3137EAEN5 FREDDIE MAC 2.75% 19JUN2023 {1,440.26) 0.00 {8,504.88) 4,430.56 0.00 - - -
Total Government Agencies (11,069.96) 0.00 (136,795.61) 39,205.57 30,625.00 Government Bonds
91282CBEO USA TREASURY 0.125% 15JAN2024 350.34 0.00 (14,027.36) 193.61 0.00 91282CAX9 USA TREASURY 0.125% 30NOV2022 1,339.29 0.00 3,533.24 204.91 0.00 20 November 15, 2022, Item #11
DETAIL OF RETURN AND INTEREST RECEIVED
CITY OF POWAY
For the period September 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022
N
0\
g,cusip Description Accretion Realized gain Change in fair Interest earned Interest received w (amortization) (loss) value
0 Government Bonds
91282CCN9 USA TREASURY 0.125% 31JUL2023 664.59 0.00 (4,468.75) 132.47 0.00 91282CAR2 USA TREASURY 0.125% 31 OCT2022 1,161.95 0.00 4,321.12 203.80 0.00 91282CDA6 USA TREASURY 0.25% 30SEP2023 680.18 0.00 (8,320.30) 307.38 1,875.00 91282CAJO USA TREASURY 0.25% 31 AUG2025 3,109.44 0.00 (24,062.50) 290.06 0.00 91282CAT8 USA TREASURY 0.25% 31 OCT2025 2,949.61 0.00 (21,515.61) 244.56 0.00 912828ZL7 USA TREASURY 0.375% 30APR2025 5,235.84 0.00 (44,632.83) 886.55 0.00 91282CBC4 USA TREASURY 0.375% 31 DEC2025 4,664.20 0.00 (42,226.58) 703.12 0.00 91282CBT7 USA TREASURY 0. 75% 31 MAR2026 244.21 0.00 (606.25) 0.00 0.00 912828201 USA TREASURY 1.375% 31 AUG2023 656.06 0.00 (10,781.26) 2,279.01 0.00 912828YH7 USA TREASURY 1.5% 30SEP2024 (845.67) 0.00 (12,851.57) 1,229.Sl 7,500.00 912828YM6 USA TREASURY 1.5% 31 OCT2024 (851.48) 0.00 (15, 125.00) 1,345.10 0.00 912828T91 USA TREASURY 1.625% 31 OCT2023 (1,629.56) 0.00 (12,000.00) 2,119.56 0.00 912828L57 USA TREASURY 1. 75% 30SEP2022 14.72 0.00 426.89 1,434.43 8,750.00 912828YYO USA TREASURY 1.75% 31 DEC2024 (1,075.57) 0.00 (14,257.81) 1,450.54 0.00 912828X70 USA TREASURY 2% 30APR2024 (644.29) 0.00 (23,750.00) 3,260.87 0.00 912828U57 USA TREASURY 2.125% 30NOV2023 (483.00) 0.00 (15,363.28) 3,309.42 0.00 9128285P1 USA TREASURY 2.875% 30NOV2023 (2,116.25) 0.00 (10,140.62) 2,592.22 0.00 - - -
Total Government Bonds 13,424.61 0.00 (265,848.47) 22,187.12 18,125.00 ..
~ (OOii
21 November 15, 2022, Item #11
TRANSACTION REPORT
CITY OF POWAY
For the period September 1, 2022 - September 30, 2022
N
-.J
g, Trade date Cusip Transaction Sec type Description Maturity Par value or Realized Principal Interest Transaction total wsettle date shares gain(loss)
C
09/04/2022 17275RAN2 Income Corporate Bonds CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.625% 03/04/2024 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 18,125.00 18,125.00 09/04/2022
09/05/2022 06051 GHF9 Income Corporate Bonds BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.55% 03/05/2024 2,350,000.00 0.00 0.00 41,712.50 41,712.50 09/05/2022
09/08/2022 3133EJFKO Income Government Agencies FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/08/2023 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 13,250.00 13,250.00 09/08/2022
09/11/2022 24422ETC3 Income Corporate Bonds JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 09/11/2025 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 17,000.00 17,000.00 09/11/2022
09/12/2022 3135GOU43 Income Government Agencies FANNIE MAE 2.875% 09/12/2023 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 14,375.00 14,375 .00 09/12/2022
09/15/2022 084670BR8 Income Corporate Bonds BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 03/15/2023 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 13,750.00 13,750.00 09/15/2022
09/28/2022 3133EMBE1 Income Government Agencies FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/28/2024 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 09/28/2022
09/28/2022 91282CBT7 Bought Government Bonds USA TREASURY 0.75% 03/31/2026 1,400,000.00 0.00 (1,243,707.82) 0.00 (1,243,707 .82) 09/30/2022
09/30/2022 912828L57 Income Government Bonds USA TREASURY 1.75% 09/30/2022 1,000,000 .00 0.00 0.00 8,750.00 8,750 .00 09/30/2022
09/30/2022 912828L57 Capital Change Government Bonds USA TREASURY 1. 75% 09/30/2022 (1,000,000.00) 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 09/30/2022
09/30/2022 912828YH7 Income Government Bonds USA TREASURY 1.5% 09/30/2024 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 09/30/2022
09/30/2022 91282CDA6 Income Government Bonds
USA TREASURY 0.25% 09/30/2023 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,875.00 1,875.00 09/30/2022
09/30/2022 Income Cash and
Cash Equivalents Cash 0.00 0.00 0.00 540.83 540.83
22 November 15, 2022, Item #11
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CITY OF POWAY
As of September 30, 2022
N
OOPast performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and any income from them will fluctuate and is not guaranteed (this may partly be due to exchange rate changes) and investors may not get O back the amount invested. Transactions in foreign securities may be executed and settled in local markets. Performance comparisons will be affected by changes in interest rates. Investment returns fluctuate due to changes ~in market conditions. Investment involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. No assurance can be given that the performance objectives of a given strategy will be achieved. The information contained herein is for oyour reference only and is being provided in response to your specific request and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, no representation is made regarding its accuracy or completeness. This document must not be used for the purpose of an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful or otherwise not permitted. This document should not be duplicated, amended, or forwarded to a third party without consent from Insight. This is a marketing document intended for professional clients only and should not be made available to or relied upon by retail clients Investment advisory services in North America are provided through two different SEC-registered investment advisers using the brand Insight Investment: Insight North America LLC (INA) and Insight Investment International Limited (IIIL). The North American investment advisers are associated with a broader group of global investment managers that also (individually and collectively) use the corporate brand Insight Investment and may be referred to as Insight, Insight Group or Insight Investment.
INA is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training.
You may request, without charge, additional information about Insight. Moreover, specific information relating to Insights strategies, including investment advisory fees, may be obtained from INA's Form ADV Part 2A, which is available without charge upon request.
Where indicated, performance numbers used in the analysis are gross returns. The performance reflects the reinvestment of all dividends and income. INA charges management fees on all portfolios managed and these fees will reduce the returns on the portfolios. For example, assume that $30 million is invested in an account with INA, and this account achieves a 5.0% annual return compounded monthly, gross of fees, for a period of five years.
At the end of five years that account would have grown to $38,500,760 before the deduction of management fees. Assuming management fees of 0.25% per year are deducted monthly from the account, the value at the end of the five year period would be $38,022,447. Actual fees for new accounts are dependent on size and subject to negotiation. INA's investment advisory fees are discussed in Part 2A of its Form ADV.
Unless otherwise stated, the source of information is Insight. Any forecasts or opinions are Insight's own at the date of this document (or as otherwise specified) and may change. Material in this publication is for general information only and is not advice, investment advice, or the recommendation of any purchase or sale of any security. Insight makes no implied or expressed recommendations concerning the manner in which an account should or would be handled, as appropriate investment strategies depend upon specific investment guidelines and objectives and should not be construed to be an assurance that any particular security in a strategy will remain in any fund, account, or strategy, or that a previously held security will not be repurchased. It should not be assumed that any of the security transactions or holdings referenced herein have been or will prove to be profitable or that future investment decisions will be profitable or will equal or exceed the past investment performance of the securities listed.
Please compare the information provided in this statement to the information provided in the statement received from your Custodian.
For trading activity the Clearing broker will be reflected. In certain cases the Clearing broker will differ from the Executing broker.
In calculating ratings distributions and weighted average portfolio quality, Insight assigns U.S Treasury and U.S agency securities a quality rating based on the methodology used within the respective benchmark index. When Moody's, S&P and Fitch rate a security, Bank of America and Merrill Lynch indexes assign a simple weighted average statistic while Barclays indexes assign the median statistic. Insight assigns all other securities the lower of Moody's and S&P ratings.
Information about the indices shown here is provided to allow for comparison of the performance of the strategy to that of certain well-known-and widely recognized indices. There is no representation that such index is an appropriate benchmark for such comparison. You cannot invest directly in an index and the indices represented do not take into account trading commissions and/or other brokerage or custodial costs. The volatility of the indices may be materially different from that of the strategy. In addition, the strategy's holdings may differ substantially from the securities that comprise the indices shown.
The ICE BofA 3 Month UST-Bill index is an unmanaged market index of U.S. Treasury securities maturing in 90 days that assumes reinvestment of all income.
The ICE BofA 6 Month UST-Bill index measures the performance of Treasury bills with time to maturity of less than 6 months.
The ICE BofA 1-Year US Treasury Index is a one-security index comprised of the most recently issued 1-year US Treasury note. The index is rebalanced monthly. In order to qualify for inclusion, a 1-year note must be auctioned on or before the third business day before the last business day of the month.
The ICE BofA 3-Year US Treasury Index is a one-security index comprised of the most recently issued 3-year US Treasury note. The index is rebalanced monthly. In order to qualify for inclusion, a 3-year note must be auctioned on or before the third business day before the last business day of the month.
The ICE BofA 5-Year US Treasury Index is a one-security index comprised of the most recently issued S-year US Treasury note. The index is rebalanced monthly. In order to qualify for inclusion, a 5-year note must be auctioned on or before the third business day before the last business day of the month.
The ICE BofA 1-3 us Year Treasury Index is an unmanaged index that tracks the performance of the direct sovereign debt of the U.S. Government having a maturity of at least one year and less than three years.
The ICE BofA 1-5 us Year Treasury Index is an unmanaged index that tracks the performance of the direct sovereign debt of the U.S. Government having a maturity of at least one year and less than five years. 23 November 15, 2022, Item #11
N \D
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
As of September 30, 2022
CITY OF POWAY
g,1nsight does not provide tax or legal advice to its clients and all investors are strongly urged to consult their tax and legal advisors regarding any potential strategy or investment. w Olnsight is a group of wholly owned subsidiaries ofThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may also be used as a generic term to reference the Corporation as a whole or its various subsidiaries generally. Products and services may be provided under various brand names and in various countries by subsidiaries, affiliates and joint ventures ofThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation where authorized and regulated as required within each jurisdiction. Unless you are notified to the contrary, the products and services mentioned are not insured by the FDIC (or by any governmental entity) and are not guaranteed by or obligations of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation or any of its affiliates. The Bank of New York Corporation assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the above data and disclaims all expressed or implied warranties in connection therewith. © 2022 Insight Investment. All rights reserved.
24 November 15, 2022, Item #11
w
0 0 ....
w
0 ~ --f )>
n :c s: m
z
--f
C
City of Poway Investments & Cash with Fiscal Agent; Non-Managed Investments; General, Payroll & Petty Cash September 2022
Investments & Cash with Fiscal A!lents
Settlement Yield to
INVESTMENT DESCRIPTION Date Maturity
1st Am Gov't Obligations Money Mkt Fd 09/30/22 I Various! Average/Total
Paying Agent or Uninvested Cash ft DITs
Total Investments and Cash with Fiscal Agent
Non-Managed Investments
INVESTMENT DESCRIPTION
County Pool
Average/Total
General, Payroll & Petty Cash
General Cash (Union Bank)
Payroll Cash (Union Bank)
Emergency Cash (Union Bank)
Grant Cash (Union Bank)
Flexible Benefits Cash (Union Bank)
Petty Cash
Total Cash
Various]
Settlement Yield to
Date Maturity
09/30/22 1 1.80%1
I·
I 1.80%1
Part I
Days t~ % of Total
Maturity Investment
1J 100.00%1
I I I
I I
I I
1J 100.00%1
Part II
Days to % of Total
Maturity Investment
1 I 100.00%1
I I
N/A Ir 100.00%1
Part Ill
Face
Value
$496,699.90 I
Face . -1 f~
Value
$113,83 1.54 1
$113,831.54 1
Book
Value
$496,699.90 J
$496,699.90 I
so.oo I
$496,699.90 J
Book
Value
$113,831.54 1
$113,831.54 1
Book
Value
$5,808,615.00
$20,000.00
$10,000 .00
$0.00
$20,000.00
$170.00
$5,858,785 .00
Market
Value
$496,699. 90
$496,699.90
Market
Value
s110,865 .oo I
s 110,865.oo I
Unrealized
Gain(Loss)
so.oo J
so.oo I
Unrealized
Gain(Loss)
($2,966 .54)1
I
($2,966.54) 1
November 15, 2022, Item #11
AG EN DA REPORT City of Poway
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Aaron Bea nan, Director of Finance )-6
Mehrnoush Jamshidi, Finance Manager ~
858-668-4426 or [email protected]
Investment Policy Review
CITY COUNCIL
Pursuant to California Government Code Sec. 53646 and the City's Investment Policy (Policy), the Director of Finance serving in the capacity as City Treasurer is submitting the Policy to the City Council for its annual review. This Policy is an important tool for ensuring the stewardship of the City's financial resources. Staff is not proposing any changes to the Policy.
Recommended Action:
There is no recommended action; this item is a report and file only.
Discussion:
The City of Poway invests its funds according to parameters set forth in the City's adopted Policy. The Policy is consistent with California Government Code Section 53600, et seq. which prov ides standards regarding investment policies and reports, securities, and repurchase agreements for local agencies.
The Policy was last modified and/or reviewed on August 3, 2021.
Since July 1, 1996, the City has worked with an investment advisor to assist in the administration of the City's investment portfolio. The current investment advisor is Insight Investment, an investment firm of BNY Mellon Investment Management. The Policy defines the role of the City's investment advisor and the procedures to be followed. The Investment Oversight Committee (Committee) comprised of the Director of Finance, the Finance Manager, and the Senior Accountant, oversees the investment of the City's funds. This Committee works with the investment advisor to ensure the Policy is being followed.
Based on a review of the Policy, the Committee and investment advisor have no proposed changes to the current investment policy; Attachment A for reference. 1 of 12
November 15, 2022, Item #12
Environmental Review:
This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Fiscal Impact:
The Investment Policy is designed to enhance the economic status of the City while protecting its funds.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Investment Policy
Reviewed/ Approved By:
Assistant City Manager
2 of 12
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
November 15, 2022, Item #12
CITY OF POWAY
INVESTMENT POLICY
Dated: November 15, 2022
The City of Poway (the City) has adopted this Investment Policy (Policy) in order to establish the investment scope, objectives, delegation of authority, standards of prudence, reporting requirements, internal controls, eligible investments and transactions, diversification requirements, risk tolerance, and safekeeping and custodial procedures for the investment of the funds of the City. All City funds will be invested in accordance with this Policy and with applicable sections of the California Government Code.
This Policy replaces any previous Policy or investment procedures of the City.
SCOPE
The provisions of this Policy shall apply to all financial assets and investment activities of the City as accounted for in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The employees' retirement and deferred compensation funds are not covered by this Policy. Also, bond reserve funds will be invested in accordance with each bond issue's indenture agreement.
All cash shall be pooled for investment purposes. The investment income derived from the pooled investment account shall be allocated to the General Fund, the Water Fund, the Sewer Fund, and other funds as budgeted or required by legislation based upon the proportion of the respective average balances relative to the total pooled balance. Investment income shall be distributed to the individual funds not less than annually.
OBJECTIVES
The City's funds shall be invested in accordance with all applicable City resolutions, California statutes, and Federal regulations, and in a manner designed to accomplish the following objectives, which are listed in priority order:
1. Preservation of capital and protection of investment principal.
2. Maintenance of sufficient liquidity to meet anticipated cash flows.
3. Attainment of a market rate of return.
4. Diversification to avoid incurring unreasonable market risks.
ATTACHMENT A
3 of 12
November 15, 2022, Item #12
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
In accordance with City of Poway Resolution No. 21-064, the City Treasurer/Finance Department is authorized to invest the City's funds in accordance with the California Government Code Section 53607. The City's Director of Finance serves as the Treasurer. The Director of Finance may delegate the authority to conduct investment transactions and to manage the operation of the investment portfolio to other specifically authorized staff members. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as expressly provided under the terms of this Policy.
The Director of Finance shall develop administrative procedures and internal controls, consistent with this Policy, for the operation of the City's investment program. Such procedures shall be designed to prevent losses of public funds arising from fraud, employee error, misrepresentation by third parties, or imprudent actions by employees of the City.
The City may engage the support services of outside investment advisors with respect to its investment program, so long as it can be demonstrated that these services produce a net financial advantage or necessary financial protection of the City's financial resources. If an investment advisor is selected to help manage the investment program, a City Investment · Oversight Committee shall be kept informed of the changing investment environment and any potential restructuring of the portfolio which could result. This Investment Committee shall consist of the Director of Finance, the Finance Manager, and the Senior Accountant.
PRUDENCE
The standard of prudence to be used for managing the City's investment program is California Government Code Section 53600.3, the prudent investor standard, which states that "when investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency."
The City's overall investment program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism that is worthy of the public trust. The City recognizes that no investment is totally without risk and that the investment activities of the City are a matter of public record. Accordingly, the City recognizes that occasional measured losses may occur in a diversified portfolio and shall be considered within the context of the overall portfolio's return, provided that adequate diversification has been implemented and that the sale of a security is in the best long-term interest of the City.
The Director of Finance and authorized investment personnel acting in accordance with established procedures and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided that deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion to the City Council and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.
4 of 12
November 15, 2022, Item #12
ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Elected officials and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the City's investment program or could impair or create the appearance of an impairment of their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall subordinate their personal investment transactions to those of the City. In addition, City Councilmembers, the Director of Finance, the Finance Manager, and the Senior Accountant shall file a Statement of Economic Interests each year as required by California Government Code Section 87203 and regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission.
AUTHORIZED SECURITIES AND TRANSACTIONS
All investments and deposits of the City shall be made in accordance with California Government Code Sections 16429.1, 53600-53609, and 53630-53686. Any revisions or extensions of these code sections will be assumed to be part of this Policy immediately upon being enacted.
The City shall not knowingly make any investments in any institution, company, corporation, subsidiary, or affiliate that practices or supports directly or indirectly through its actions, discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, creed, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual preference, or physical disability.
The City has further restricted the eligible types of securities and transactions as follows:
1. United States Treasury bills, notes, or bonds with a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement. There is no limit on the percentage of the portfolio that may be invested in U.S. Treasury securities.
2. Government Securities
Government Securities in the aggregate shall not exceed 75% of the City's total portfolio. • Federal Instrumentality Obligations (government sponsored enterprises) with a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement. No more than 25% of the City's total portfolio shall be invested in any one issuer and the aggregate amount shall not exceed 75% of the City's total portfolio.
• Federal Agency Obligations with a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement. No more than 25% of the City's total portfolio shall be invested in any one issuer and the aggregate amount shall not exceed 75% of the City's total portfolio. • Mortgage-Related Securities, including Federal Agency and Federal Instrumentality mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. Such securities shall not exceed five years from the date of trade settlement and must be rated at least "AAA" by at least one Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organization (NRSRO) and issued by an issuer rated at least "A" or the equivalent by an NRSRO. No more than 20% of the City's total portfolio shall be invested in the combination of Mortgage-Related Securities and Asset-Backed Securities.
5 of 12
November 15, 2022, Item #12
3. Supranationals are United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank, with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of "AA" or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO. No more than 30% of the City's total portfolio shall be invested pursuant to this section.
4. Corporate Securities
No more than 5% of the City's portfolio shall be invested in the obligations of any one corporate issuer. Rule 144A (private placement) securities are prohibited from purchase. • Medium-Term Notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. Such securities shall have a final maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement and shall be rated at least "A", or the equivalent, by an NRSRO. No more than 30% of the City's total portfolio shall be invested in Medium-term Notes.
• Asset-Backed Securities including equipment lease-backed certificates, consumer receivable pass-through certificates, or consumer-receivable-backed bonds. Such securities shall not exceed five years from the date of trade settlement and must be rated at least "AAA" by at least one NRSRO and issued by an issuer rated at least "A" or the equivalent by an NRSRO. No more than 20% of the City's total portfolio shall be invested in Mortgage-Related Securities and Asset-Backed Securities. • Prime Commercial Paper with a maturity not exceeding 270 days from the date of trade settlement and rated at least "A-1 ", or the equivalent, by an NRSRO. The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet all of the following conditions in either sub-paragraph A or sub-paragraph B. below:
A The entity shall (1) be organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation, (2) have total assets in excess of $500,000,000 and (3) have debt other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated at least "A" or the equivalent by an NRSRO.
B. The entity shall (1) be organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company, (2) have program wide credit enhancements, including, but not limited to, over collateralization, letters of credit or surety bond and (3) have commercial paper that is rated at least "A-1" or the equivalent by an NRSRO.
Investment in commercial paper shall not exceed 25% of the City's total portfolio.
5. Municipal Bonds including registered notes or bonds of any of the 50 states, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the 50 states.
In addition, bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of any local agency in California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the local agency.
6 of 12
November 15, 2022, Item #12
Municipal Bonds must be rated at least "A" or the equivalent by an NRSRO with maturities not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement. No more than 5% of the City's portfolio shall be invested in the obligations of any one issuer, and the aggregate investment in municipal bonds shall not exceed 30% of the City's total portfolio.
6. Negotiable Certificates of Deposits (CDs) of commercial banks rated at least "A-1", or the equivalent, with maturities not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement. In addition, the City may not invest in the CD of a state or federal credit union where any person with investment decision making authority at the City also serves on the board of directors, or any committee appointed by the board of directors, or the credit committee or the supervisory committee of the state or federal credit union issuing the negotiable certificates of deposit. No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in the CDs of any one issuer, and the aggregate investment in CDs shall not exceed 30% of the portfolio.
7. Non-negotiable Certificates of Deposit and savings deposits with a maturity not exceeding five years from the date of trade settlement, in FDIC insured state or nationally chartered banks or savings banks that qualify as a depository of public funds in the State of California as defined in California Government Code Section 53630.5.
Deposits in excess of the insured amount shall be secured pursuant to California Government Code Section 53651 and 53652. The City shall comply with and act to secure compliance with the security (collateralization) system specified in the Government Code Section 53649 and 53652.
8. Eligible Banker's Acceptances with a maturity not exceeding 180 days from the date of trade settlement, drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank whose senior long-term debt is rated at least "A", or the equivalent, by an NRSRO at the time of purchase. Banker's Acceptances shall be rated at least "A-1 ", or the equivalent, at the time of purchase by an NRSRO. No more than 5% of the City's total portfolio shall be invested in banker's acceptances of any one bank and the aggregate investment in banker's acceptances shall not exceed 40% of the City's total portfolio.
9. Money Market Funds registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that (1) are "no load" (meaning no commission or fee shall be charged on purchases or sales of shares); (2) have a constant net asset value per share of $1.00; (3) invest only in the securities and obligations authorized in the applicable California statutes and (4) have a rating of at least "AAA", or the equivalent by at least two NRSROs. No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in any one fund and the aggregate investment in money market funds shall not exceed 20% of the City's total portfolio.
10. Shares of Beneficial Interest issued by a joint powers authority (e.g., CalTRUST) organized pursuant to Section 6509.7 that invest in the securities and obligations authorized in subdivisions (a) to (o), inclusive, of California Government Code Section 53601. Each share shall represent an equal proportional interest in the underlying pool of securities owned by the joint powers authority . To be eligible under this section, the joint powers authority issuing the shares shall have retained an investment advisor that:
7 of 12
(1) is registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission .
(2) has at least five years of experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized in subdivisions (a) to (o), inclusive, of California Government Code Section 53601.
(3) has assets under management in excess of $500,000,000 .
November 15, 2022, Item #12
11 . State of California's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), pursuant to California Government Code Section 16429.1.
12. The San Diego County Investment Pool. The City may invest in this investment pool, established by the San Diego County Treasurer for the benefit of local public agencies.
The foregoing list of authorized securities and transactions shall be strictly interpreted. Any deviation from this list must be preapproved by resolution of the City Council.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
If the City has employed an external investment advisor to help manage its portfolio, the investment advisor shall be bound by the aforementioned list of authorized securities, the state and local laws and regulations that govern the investment activity of the City, and the following additional parameters .
• While it is understood that occasionally it may be in the best interest of the City to take losses in its security portfolio, losses taken to increase the yield in the portfolio may only be taken if the increased yield results in the loss being recouped in one year or less.
Credit-related losses on the other hand are taken to prevent potentially larger losses in the future. When possible, the investment advisor will get prior approval of the City before taking credit-related losses. In any case, the City will be notified as soon as possible about any losses taken in the portfolio.
• Securities that are downgraded by one or more rating agency to below the ratings required by this Policy do not have to be sold. However, the investment advisor will immediately notify the City of the downgrade. The advisor will prepare a credit report on the downgraded security and forward it to the City.
While the City entrusts its investment portfolio to the advisor, the City retains the right to ultimately make the decisions on how to invest its monies.
INVESTMENT DIVERSIFICATION
The City shall diversify its investments to avoid incurring unreasonable risks inherent in over investing in specific instruments, individual financial institutions or maturities. Nevertheless, the asset allocation in the investment portfolio should be flexible depending upon the outlook for the economy, the securities markets and the City's anticipated cash flow needs.
PORTFOLIO MATURITIES AND LIQUIDITY
To the extent possible, investments shall be matched with anticipated cash flow requirements and known future liabilities. The City will not invest in securities maturing more than five years from the date of trade settlement, unless the City Council has by resolution granted authority to make such an investment at least three months prior to the date of investment. 8 of 12
November 15, 2022, Item #12
SELECTION OF BROKER/DEALERS
The Finance Manager shall maintain a list of broker/dealers approved for investment purposes, and it shall be the policy of the City to purchase securities only from those brokers and the firms they represent. Each approved broker/dealer must possess an authorizing certificate from the California Commissioner of Corporations as required by Section 2521 O of the California Corporations Code.
To be eligible, a firm must meet at least one of the following criteria:
1. Be recognized as Primary Dealers by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or have a primary dealer within their holding company structure, or
2. Report voluntarily to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or
3. Qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 15c3-1 (Uniform Net Capital Rule).
The City may engage the services of investment advisory firms to assist in the management of the portfolio and investment advisors may utilize their own list of approved broker/dealers.
Such broker/dealers will comply with the selection criteria above and the list of approved firms shall be provided to the City on an annual basis or upon request.
In the event that an external investment advisor is not used in the process of recommending a particular transaction in the City's portfolio, authorized broker/dealers shall attest in writing that they have received a copy of this Policy and each authorized broker/dealer shall be required to submit and annually update a City approved Broker/Dealer Information Request form that includes the firm's most recent financial statements.
The City may purchase commercial paper from direct issuers even though they are not on the approved broker/dealers list as long as they meet the criteria outlined in Item 4 of the Authorized Securities and Transactions section of this Policy.
COMPETITIVE TRANSACTIONS
All investment transactions shall be conducted competitively with authorized broker/dealers .
At least three broker/dealers shall be contacted for each transaction and their bid or offering prices shall be recorded.
If the City is offered a security for which there is no other readily available competitive offering, then the Finance Manager will document quotations for comparable or alternative securities.
SELECTION OF BANKS
The Finance Manager shall maintain a list of FDIC insured banks approved to provide depository and other banking services for the City. To be eligible, a bank shall qualify as a depository of public funds in the State of California as defined in California Government Code Section 53630.5 and shall secure deposits in excess of FDIC insurance coverage in accordance with California Government Code Section 53652. 9 of 12
November 15, 2022, Item #12
SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY
The Finance Manager shall select one or more banks to provide safekeeping and custodial services for the City. A Safekeeping Agreement approved by the City shall be executed with each custodian bank prior to utilizing that bank's safekeeping services.
Custodian banks will be selected on the basis of their ability to provide services for the City's account and the competitive pricing of their safekeeping related services.
The purchase and sale of securities and repurchase agreement transactions shall be settled on a delivery versus payment basis. All securities shall be perfected in the name of the City.
Sufficient evidence to title shall be consistent with modern investment, banking, and commercial practices.
All deliverable securities purchased by the City will be delivered by book entry and will be held in third-party safekeeping by a City approved custodian bank or its Depository Trust Company (OTC) participant account.
PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE
The investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account prevailing market conditions, risk constraints for eligible securities, and cash flow requirements. The performance of the City's investments shall be compared to the average yield on the U.S. Treasury security that most closely corresponds to the portfolio's weighted average effective maturity. When comparing the performance of the City's portfolio, its rate of return will be computed net of all fees and expenses.
REPORTING
Quarterly, the Director of Finance shall submit to the City Council a report of the investment earnings and performance results of the City's investment portfolio. The report shall include the following information:
1. Investment type, issuer, date of maturity, par value and dollar amount invested in all securities, and investments and monies held by the City;
2. A description of the funds, investments, and programs;
3. A market value as of the date of the report (or the most recent valuation as to assets not valued monthly) and the source of the valuation;
4. A statement of compliance with the Investment Policy or an explanation for non compliance; and
5. A statement of the City's ability to meet expenditure requirements for six months, and an explanation of why money will not be available if that is the case. 10 of 12
November 15, 2022, Item #12
POLICY REVIEW
This Policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, yield and diversification, and its relevance to current law and economic trends. Amendments to this Policy shall be approved by resolution of the City Council.
SEGREGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
FUNCTION
1.0 Investment Policy:
1.1 Preparation and annual review
of Investment Policy
1.2 Approval of Investment Policy
2.0 Investment Transactions:
2.1 Calculation of cash position
2.2 If applicable, notify investment advisor
of current available cash
to be invested
2.3 Investment recommendation :
Determination of amount to be invested,
selection of type of investment, and
term of investment
2.4 Review of investment recommendation
and execution of transaction
3.0 Recording of Transactions:
3.1 In investment subsidiary ledgers
3.2 In accounting records
3.3 Match investment confirmation
to subsidiary ledgers
4.0 Safeguarding of Assets and Records:
4.1 Reconciliation of subsidiary records to
the accounting records
4.2 Reconciliation of subsidiary records to
bank statements and safekeeping records
4.3 Review of financial institutions and
investment brokers' reputation and
financial condition
4.4 Review of collaterals
5.0 Investment portfolio:
5.1 Preparation of investment report
5.2 Review of portfolio for compliance
with stated Investment Policy
5.3 Approval of investment report
11 of 12
RESPONSIBILITY
Director of Finance/
Oversight Committee
City Council
Sr. Accountant/Finance Mgr.
Written approval by 2 members
of Oversight Committee
Investment Advisor/
Director of Finance/Finance Mgr.
Written approval by member
of Oversight Committee
Sr. Accountant/Accountant
Sr. Accountant/Accountant
Senior Accountant
Senior Accountant
Senior Accountant
Investment Advisor/
Oversight Committee
Investment Adv./Oversight Comm.
Senior Accountant
Oversight Committee
City Council
November 15, 2022, Item #12
APPROVED BROKER/DEALERS
The following Broker/Dealers are approved for execution of trades.
Amherst Pierpont
ANZ Securities
Barclays Capital
BB&T Securities
Blaylock Van
BMO Capital Markets
BNP Paribas Securities
BofA Securities
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
Citigroup Global Markets
Credit Agricole Securities (USA)
Credit Suisse Securities (USA)
Daiwa Capital Markets America
Deutsche Bank Securities
FHN Financial Securities
Goldman Sachs & Co.
HSBC Securities (USA)
lncapital
INTL FCStone Financial
Jefferies
JP Morgan Securities
Keybanc Capital Markets
Mizuho Securities (USA)
Broker/Dealers
Morgan Stanley & Co.
MUFG Securities Americas
NAB Securities
NatWest Markets Securities
Nomura Securities International
Oppenheimer & Co.
Piper Jaffray & Co.
Raymond James & Associates
RBC Capital Markets
Robert W. Baird & Co.
Samuel A. Ramirez & Co.
Scotia Capital (USA)
SMBC Nikko Securities America
SG America Securities
Stifel Nicolaus & Co.
TD Securities (USA)
Truist Securities
UBS Securities
US Bancorp Investments
Wells Fargo Securities
Vining Sparks
This list of approved broker/dealers is subject to change at any time based upon periodic recommendations of the investment advisor throughout the year. 12 of 12
November 15, 2022, Item #12
AGENDA REPORT CityofPo w ay
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Robert Manis, Director of Development Services I"
Jeff Beers, Special Projects Engineer ~
(858) 668-4624 or [email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Acceptance of the FY 2021-22 Street Overlay Project; Bid No. 22-011 with Hazard Construction ENGR, LLC, as Complete
Summary:
On May 17, 2022, the City Council awarded the contract for the FY 2021-22 Street Overlay project; Bid No. 22-011 to Hazard Construction ENGR, LLC, in the amount of $899,813.00. This action will accept the project as complete .
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council:
(1) Accept the FY 2021-22 Street Overlay project as complete; (2) Authorize the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion ; (3) Authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $4,768.75, if unencumbered, 45 days after City Council acceptance;
(4) Release the Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Bond for Material and Labor in the amount of $899,813.00 after the release of retention; and (5) Retain the Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Bond for Faithful Performance for a period of one year.
Discussion:
The scope of work included the asphalt overlay of three residential streets, Fairgate Drive, Ashgate Place and Earlgate Place, within Street Maintenance Zone 5. Arterial asphalt patch repairs were completed on Poway Road from Community Road to Highway 67 and Community Road from Poway Road to Stowe Drive and Espola Road from Titan Way to Twin Peaks Road along with ADA pedestrian ramp removal and replacement. This work was coordinated with the annual FY 2022-23 Street Maintenance and FY 2022-23 Citywide Striping projects .
There were three change orders for this project totaling $53,762.00. The change orders included additional repairs on Espola Road, reconstruction of Northcrest Lane and a zero out change order to adjust the contract to the exact quantities used. The final contract amount is $953,575.00. 1 of 2
November 15, 2022, Item #13
Environmental Review:
The matter of acceptance of public improvements that have been completed, which were the subject of a prior environmental determination, is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act.
Fiscal Impact:
Sufficient funds are available in the FY 2021-22 Street Overlay project account (ST019) for the release of retention.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
None.
Reviewed/Approved By:
Wen~ aserman
Assistant City Manager
2 of2
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
(fir£
City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #13
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA REPORT CityofP oway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Robert Manis, Director of Development Services /)vi
Henry Trang, Senior Civil Engineer ft;·
(858) 668-4602 or [email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
Approval of Consultant Agreement with STC Traffic, Inc. for Design Services for the Poway Road Safety Improvements Project; RFP No. 23-005
In August 2022, the Development Services Department issued a Request for Proposal (RFP No. 23- 005) for design services for the Poway Road Safety Improvements Project. This action will approve the Consultant Agreement with STC Traffic, Inc. to provide engineering services for the project.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council approve the Agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement with STC Traffic, Inc. for design services for the Poway Road Safety Improvements Project (Attachment A), with a not-to-exceed fee of $74,278.32.
Discussion:
The City applied for a Cycle 10 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant in November 2020.
After notification of the grant application approval, City Council accepted the grant and authorized the transfer of the required matching funds to the project budget. The total project cost is estimated to be $604,100 for design and construction. The grant was approved for $589,980, and $14,120 in matching funds was transferred from the Traffic Engineering budget.
The project proposes to install directional medians at four non-signalized locations along Poway Road.
The median installation would restrict left turns onto Poway Road while still allowing drivers to turn left into shopping centers along the street. The project also includes upgrades to five signalized intersections on Poway Road - Pomerado Road, Silverlake Drive, Civic Center Drive, Community Road, and Midland Road. The upgrades include adding advanced dilemma zone detection and leading pedestrian intervals. A dilemma zone is a length of roadway on the approach to a signalized intersection within which drivers are indecisive as to whether to stop or continue through the intersection when seeing the yellow light. By adding advance vehicle detection in the dilemma zone, the number of crashes and number of vehicles running red lights should be reduced. Signal timing is adjusted based upori the additional detection essentially making the signals smarter. Dilemma zone detection will also improve traffic flow along Poway Road by clearing out vehicles from the 1 of 25
November 15, 2022, Item #14
intersections more effectively. Leading pedestrian interval minimizes conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians by allowing pedestrians approximately three to seven seconds to advance through the crosswalk prior to vehicles being allowed to turn through the intersection . These improvements are acknowledged in the Local Road Safety Plan, also on the November 15 agenda, as measures that improve safety.
The City issued a Request for Proposals for design services for the Poway Road Safety Improvements on August 31 , 2022 and received a total of three proposals . The fees for the project ranged from $50,000 to $76,000. After careful review of the proposals , staff determined that STC Traffic, Inc. was highly qualified and most cost effective to perform the design work required. Approval of this Consultant Agreement will provide professional services for the Poway Road Safety Improvements project.
Environmental Review:
This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Fiscal Impact:
The consultant 's fee will be based on the scope of work as outlined in the Agreement. The not-to exceed fee of $74,278.32 for professional services will be the basis for this effort. Funds totaling $604,100.00 are available in the Poway Road Safety Improvements (ST018) project , $589,980 of which are HSIP grant funds .
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Consultant Agreement
Reviewed/Approved By:
Assistant City Manager
2 of 25
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #14
City of Poway
STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
This Agreement, entered into this 16th day of November, 2022, by and between the CITY OF POWAY (hereinafter referred to as "City") and STC TRAFFIC, INC., {hereinafter referred to as "Consultant").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, City desires to obtain the services of a private consultant to prepare plans, specifications, and estimates for the Poway Road Safety Improvements Project (Project); and WHEREAS, Consultant is a civil engineering consultant and has represented that Consultant possesses the necessary qualifications to provide such services; and WHEREAS, City has authorized the preparation of an agreement to retain the services of Consultant as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT CITY DOES HEREBY RETAIN CONSULTANT ON THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
1. Scope of Services.
Consultant shall provide services as described in Exhibit "A" entitled "Special Provisions" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. Compensation and Reimbursement.
City shall compensate and reimburse Consultant as provided in Exhibit "A" entitled "Special Provisions" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Term of Agreement.
The term of this Agreement shall be as described on Exhibit "A" entitled "Special Provisions" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
4. Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by City. Termination without cause shall be effective only upon 60-day written notice to Consultant. During said 60- day period Consultant shall perform all consulting services in accordance with this Agreement.
This Agreement may be terminated by City for cause in the event of a material breach of this Agreement, misrepresentation by Consultant in connection with the formation of this Agreement or the performance of services, or the failure to perform services as directed by City.
Termination for cause shall be effected by delivery of written notice of termination to Consultant.
Such termination shall be effective upon delivery of said notice. 3 of 25 ATTACHMENT A
1 November 15, 2022, Item #14
5. Confidential Relationship.
City may from time to time communicate to Consultant certain information to enable Consultant to effectively perform the services. Consultant shall treat all such information as confidential, whether or not so identified, and shall not disclose any part thereof without the prior written consent of the City. Consultant shall limit the use and circulation of such information, even within its own organization, to the extent necessary to perform the services.
The foregoing obligation of this Paragraph 5, however, shall not apply to any part of the information that (i) has been disclosed in publicly available sources of information; (ii) is, through no fault of Consultant, hereafter disclosed in publicly available sources of information; (iii) is now in the possession of Consultant without any obligation of confidentiality; or (iv) has been or is hereafter rightfully disclosed to Consultant by a third party, but only to the extent that the use or disclosure thereof has been or is rightfully authorized by that third party.
Consultant shall not disclose any reports, recommendations, conclusions or other results of the services or the existence of the subject matter of this contract without the prior written consent of the City. In its performance hereunder, Consultant shall comply with all legal obligations it may now or hereafter have respecting the information or other property of any other person, firm or corporation.
6. Office Space and Clerical Support.
Consultant shall provide its own office space and clerical support at its sole cost and expense.
7. Covenant Against Contingent Fees.
Consultant declares that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of the Agreement. For breach of violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or, at its sole discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.
8. Ownership of Documents.
All memoranda, reports, plans, specifications, maps and other documents prepared or obtained under the terms of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City by Consultant upon demand.
9. Conflict of Interest and Political Reform Act Obligations.
During the term of this Agreement Consultant shall not act as consultant or perform services of any kind for any person or entity whose interests conflict in any way with those of the City of Poway. Consultant shall at all times comply with the terms of the Political Reform Act and the local conflict of interest code. Consultant shall immediately disqualify itself and shall not use its official position to influence in any way any matter coming before the City in which the Consultant has a financial interest as defined in Government Code Section 87103.
Consultant represents that it has no knowledge of any financial interests which would require it to disqualify itself from any matter on which it might perform services for the City. 4of 25
2 November 15, 2022, Item #14
"Consultant" means an individual who, pursuant to a contract with a state or local agency:
(A) Makes a governmental decision whether to:
1. Approve a rate, rule or regulation;
2. Adopt or enforce a law;
3. Issue, deny, suspend, or revoke any permit, license, application, certificate, approval, order, or similar authorization or entitlement;
4. Authorize the City to enter into, modify, or renew a contract provided it is the type of contract that requires City approval;
5. Grant City approval to a contract that requires City approval and to which the City is a party, or to the specifications for such a contract;
6. Grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study, or similar item;
7. Adopt, or grant City approval of, policies, standards, or guidelines for the City, or for any subdivision thereof; or
(B) Serves in a staff capacity with the City and in that capacity participates in making a governmental decision as defined in the Political Reform Act and/or implementing regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, or performs the same or substantially all the same duties for the City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in the City's Conflict of Interest Code.
DISCLOSURE DETERMINATION:
~ 1. Consultant/Contractor will not be "making a government decision" or "serving in a staff capacity" as defined in Sections A and B above.
No disclosure required.
D 2. Consultant/Contractor will be "making a government decision" or "serving in a staff capacity" as defined in Sections A and B above. As a result, Consultant/Contractor shall be required to file a Statement of Economic Interest with the City Clerk of the City of Poway in a timely manner as required by law.
Robert J. Manis, Director of Development Services
10. No Assignments.
Neither any part nor all of this Agreement may be assigned or subcontracted, except as otherwise specifically provided herein, or to which City, in its sole discretion, consents to in advance thereof in writing. Any assignment or subcontracting in violation of this provision shall be void.
11. Maintenance of Records.
Consultant shall maintain all books, documents, papers, employee time sheets, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred and shall make such materials available at its office at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three 5 of 25 3
November 15, 2022, Item #14
(3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement, for inspection by City and copies thereof shall be furnished, if requested.
12. Independent Contractor.
At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of the City of Poway. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes such services.
13. Licenses, Permits, Etc.
Consultant represents and declares to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, any license, permit, or approval which is legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.
14. Consultant's Insurance.
Consultant shall provide insurance as set forth in Exhibit "A" entitled "Special Provisions" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
15. Indemnification.
(a) For Claims (as defined herein) other than those alleged to arise from Consultant's negligent performance of professional services, City and its respective elected and appointed boards, officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers (individually and collectively, "lndemnitees") shall have no liability to Consultant or any other person for, and Consultant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless lndemnitees from and against, any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements (collectively "Claims"), which lndemnitees may suffer or incur or to which lndemnitees may become subject by reason of or arising out of any injury to or death of any person(s), damage to property, loss of use of property, economic loss or otherwise occurring as a result of Consultant's negligent performance under this Agreement, or by the negligent or willful acts or omissions of Consultant, its agents, officers, directors, sub-consultants or employees. (b) For Claims alleged to arise from Consultant's negligent performance of professional services, lndemnitees shall have no liability to Consultant or any other person for, and Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless lndemnitees from and against, any and all Claims that lndemnitees may suffer or incur or to which lndemnitees may become subject by reason of or arising out of any injury to or death of any person(s), damage to property, loss of use of property, economic loss or otherwise to the extent occurring as a result of Consultant's negligent performance of any professional services under this Agreement, or by the negligent or willful acts or omissions of Consultant, its agents, officers, directors, sub-consultants or employees, committed in performing any of professional services under this Agreement. For Claims alleged to arise from Consultant's professional services, Consultant's defense obligation to lndemnitees shall include only the reimbursement of reasonable defense costs and attorneys' fees to the extent caused by Consultant's negligence.
6 of25 4
November 15, 2022, Item #14
(c) The foregoing obligations of Consultant shall not apply to the extent that the Claims arise from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City or its elected and appointed boards, officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers. (d) In any and all Claims against City by any employees of the Consultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by it or anyone for whose acts it may be liable, the indemnification obligation under this Section 15 shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for the Consultant under worker's compensation acts, disability benefit acts or other employee benefit acts. (e) Consultant shall, upon receipt of written notice of any Claim, promptly take all action necessary to make a claim under any applicable insurance policy or policies Consultant is carrying and maintaining; however, if Consultant fails to take such action as is necessary to make a claim under any such insurance policy, Consultant shall reimburse City for any and all costs, charges, expenses, damages and liabilities incurred by City in making any claim on behalf of Consultant under any insurance policy or policies required pursuant to this Agreement. (f) The obligations described in Section 15(a) through (e) above shall not be construed to negate, abridge or otherwise reduce any other right or obligation of indemnity which would otherwise exist as to any party or person indemnified pursuant to this Section 15. (g) The rights and obligations of the parties described in this Section 15 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
16. Assumption of Risk.
Except for injuries to persons caused by the willful misconduct of any lndemnitee and not covered by insurance maintained, or required by this Agreement to be maintained, by Consultant: (a) Consultant hereby assumes the risk of any and all injury and damage to the personnel (including death) and property of Consultant that occurs in the course of, or in connection with, the performance of Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, including but not limited to Consultant's Scope of Services; and (b) it is hereby agreed that the lndemnitees are not to be liable for injury or damage which may be sustained by the person, goods or property of Consultant or its employees in connection with Consultant's performance its obligations under this Agreement, including but not limited to Consultant's Scope of Services.
17. Consultant Not an Agent.
Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, expressed or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.
Consultant shall have no authority, expressed or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.
18. Personnel.
Consultant shall assign qualified and certified personnel to perform requested services. The City shall have the right to review and disapprove personnel for assignment to Poway projects.
City shall have the unrestricted right to order the removal of any person(s) assigned by Consultant by giving oral or written notice to Consultant to such effect. 7 of 25
5 November 15, 2022, Item #14
Consultant's personnel shall at all times comply with City's drug and alcohol policies then in effect.
19. Notices.
Notices shall be given as described on Exhibit "A" entitled "Special Provisions" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
20. Governing Law. Forum Selection and Attorneys' Fees.
This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. Each party to this Agreement consents to personal jurisdiction in San Diego County, California, and hereby authorizes and accepts service of process sufficient for personal jurisdiction by first class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, to its address for giving notice as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. Any action to enforce or interpret the terms or conditions of this Agreement shall be brought in the Superior Court in San Diego County, Central Division, unless the parties mutually agree to submit their dispute to arbitration.
Consultant hereby waives any right to remove any such action from San Diego County as is otherwise permitted by California Code of Civil Procedure section 394. The prevailing party in any such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover all of its reasonable litigation expenses, including its expert fees, attorneys' fees, courts costs, arbitration costs, and any other fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the subject of such an action is compensation claimed by Consultant in the event of termination, Consultant's damages shall be limited to compensation for the 60-day period for which Consultant would have been entitled to receive compensation if terminated without cause, and neither party shall be entitled to recover their litigation expenses.
21. Gender.
Whether referred to in the masculine, feminine, or as "it," "Consultant" shall mean the individual or corporate consultant and any and all employees of consultant providing services hereunder.
22. Counterparts.
This Agreement (and any amendments) may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. Documents delivered by telephonic facsimile transmission shall be valid and binding.
23. Entire Agreement.
This Agreement shall constitute the entire understanding between Consultant and City relating to the terms and conditions of the services to be performed by Consultant. No agreements, representations or promises made by either party, whether oral or in writing, shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be bound thereby.
24. Certification and Indemnification Regarding Public Employees' Retirement Law/Pension Reform Act of 2013.
Contractor hereby certifies that all persons providing services to City by Contractor are not current members of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and shall not become members of CalPERS while providing services to City. 8 of 25 6
November 15, 2022, Item #14
Contractor further provides that in the event Contractor assigns a retired annuitant receiving a pension benefit from CalPERS to perform services for City, the retired annuitant is in full compliance with Government Code section 7522.56. A copy of Government Code section 7522.56 is attached hereto as Exhibit "B." Further, Contractor hereby fully and unconditionally indemnifies City from all penalties, fees, employer and employee contributions, or any other assessments imposed by CalPERS in the event CalPERS determines the person assigned by Contractor to provide services to City has been misclassified.
25. Severability.
If any provision of this Agreement is determined by any court of competent jurisdiction or arbitrator to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, that provision shall, if possible, be construed as though more narrowly drawn, if a narrower construction would avoid such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability or, if that is not possible, such provision shall, to the extent of such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability, be severed, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
9 of 25
7 November 15, 2022, Item #14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement on the date first above written.
CITY OF POWAY
By: ____________ _
Chris Hazeltine, City Manager
Date: ------------
ATTEST:
Carrie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: _____________ _
Alan Fenstermacher , City Attorney
10 of 25
STC TRAFFIC, INC.
8 By: _____________ _
Jason Stack, TE, PTOE, President/CEO
Date: ------------
November 15, 2022, Item #14
"SPECIAL PROVISIONS"
EXHIBIT "A"
A. Scope of Services.
Consultant agrees to perform consulting services as required by City, which shall consist of preparing plans, specifications, and estimates further described in the Scope of Services submitted with the proposals which is included in this document as Attachment 1, and incorporated by reference, as if its contents were fully set forth herein. Consultant shall provide the necessary qualified personnel to perform the services.
B. Compensation and Reimbursement.
City shall pay Consultant a fee in accordance with the Fee Proposals submitted with the proposals which are included in this document as Attachment 2. Total fee is not to exceed Seventy-Four Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Eight and Thirty-Two Cents ($74,278.32). Consultant's fee shall include and Consultant shall be responsible for the payment of all federal, state, and local taxes of any kind which are attributable to the compensation received.
In addition to said consulting fee, Consultant shall be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses, including lodging, telephone, and travel (air, auto, rail) necessarily incurred in performance of the services. Consultant shall bill City for such expenses as incurred, referencing this Agreement. All expenses shall be itemized and supported by receipts for amounts in excess of Twenty-Five Dollars ($25.00). Statements for reimbursement of expenses shall be paid within ten (10) days of approval by City. All air travel shall be billed at coach or special fare rates. Reimbursement for lodging is limited to travel from outside of San Diego County. Consultant shall receive prior authorization for air travel and lodging expenses. All other expenses shall be reimbursed in accordance with City's cash disbursement policies in effect at the time incurred.
C. Term of Agreement.
This Agreement shall commence and be effective as of November 16, 2022 ("Effective Date"), and shall automatically terminate upon completion of the Project, as determined by the City in its sole discretion, unless sooner terminated by City as provided in the section of this Agreement entitled "Termination." Upon the termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall return to City any and all equipment, documents or materials and all copies made thereof which Consultant received from City or produced for City for the purposes of this Agreement.
D. Consultant's Insurance.
1. Coverages:
Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the life of this Agreement all of the following insurance coverages:
(a) Comprehensive General Liability, including premises-operations, products/completed, broad form property damage, and blanket contractual liability with the 11 of 25 1
November 15, 2022, Item #14
following coverages: General Liability $1,000,000 Bodily Injury and Property Damage combined each occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate.
(b) Automobile Liability, including owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles: $1,000,000 combined single limit.
(c) Consultant shall obtain and maintain, during the life of the Agreement, a policy of Professional Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance with policy limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits, per claim and annual aggregate. (d) Workers' Compensation insurance in statutory amount. All of the endorsements which are required above shall be obtained for the policy of Workers' Compensation insurance.
2. Endorsements:
Endorsements shall be obtained so that each policy contains the following three provisions:
(a) Additional Insured. (Not required for Professional Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance or Workers' Compensation.) "City of Poway and its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, and employees are additional insureds with respect to this subject project and contract with City." (b) Notice.
"Said policy shall not terminate, nor shall it be canceled, until thirty (30) days after written notice is given to City."
(c) Primary Coverage.
"The policy provides primary coverage to City and its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, and employees. It is not secondary or in any way subordinate to any other insurance or coverage maintained by City."
3. Insurance Certificates:
Consultant shall provide City certificates of insurance showing the insurance coverages described in the paragraphs above, in a form and content approved by City, prior to beginning work under this Agreement.
E. Notices.
All notices, billings and payments hereunder shall be in writing and sent to the following addresses:
To City:
To Consultant:
12 of 25 2
City of Poway - Development Services
13325 Civic Center Drive
Poway, CA 92064
STC Traffic, Inc.
5865 Avenida Encinas, Suite 142-B
Carlsbad, CA 92008
November 15, 2022, Item #14
Attachment 1
Poway Road Safety Improvements
Our project team brings together every element of this HSIP project and for good reason given a long history of implementing projects that stretch back to the very beginning of the HSIP program. STC has been providing discipline-specific traffic engineering services to local agencies in San Diego County for over 15 years, and we have been providing on-call traffic engineering services for the City of Poway since 2018. We have supported municipal agencies with developing projects, evaluating safety needs, planning and designing mobility improvements, and managing traffic systems. Our team has consistently stepped up to take advantage of alternative funding sources, secure HSIP grant awards, and raise the bar for active transportation and mobility initiatives.
We have shown our ability to deliver on the City's critical needs. For the last four years, STC has worked closely with City staff on projects and key initiatives, and we've developed long-lasting relationships and incredible respect for the City's expertise. We go above and beyond whenever there is an opportunity to do so, we respond to calls on a moment's notice, and we provide our most qualified staff to ensure project delivery.
6. Standard Method of Compensation
A description of STC's standard method of compensation, including charges for reimbursable expenses and personnel hourly billing rates, has been included in a separate sealed envelope to conform with the instructions in the RFP. Please refer to Section 10-Detailed Cost Proposal.
7. Detailed Scope of Work
The detailed Scope of Work presented below summarizes our knowledge of conditions in the project area, details of the work scope required and our approach to the design effort to ensure quality, accuracy, and ultimate compliance with the project objectives .
STC engineers have personally inspected conditions within the corridor and have utilized their extensive experience, information from the City's RFP and the grant application to develop the following Scope of Work for the project.
Task 1. Project Management and Coordination
STC's Project Manager, Christian Lambarth, PE, TE, PTOE, will coordinate the day-to-day activities for the duration of the project and serve as the primary point of contact. Following the Notice to Proceed (NTP), Mr. Lambarth will schedule a project kick-off meeting with City staff and the project team to discuss the project objectives, schedule, scope, and City policies and procedures.
The milestone construction funding allocation approval deadline is September 30, 2024. STC will develop and maintain a project schedule to achieve Caltrans approval prior to the deadline. Mr. Lambarth will also coordinate progress meetings to discuss design issues, any potential modifications to the scope, action items, and next steps. STC will prepare and email meeting agendas to City staff in advance of the meetings and email meeting minutes within five (5) days after each meeting .
STC Trb'ffixf,l 8c. I Proposal for Poway Road Safety Improvements 7 November 15, 2022, Item #14
Poway Road Safety Improvements
STC will submit a progress report with invoices to the City in an organized format and with sufficient detail and backup documentation to clearly identify personnel, hours worked, and tasks completed. STC will control all project documents and provide deliverables and final files to the City in electronic format and hard copy as requested. STC will maintain project files and data in an organized, logical fashion, and will be able to promptly retrieve and distribute project information to the City in the event of an audit or Public Records Act {PRA) request for information.
Task 1 Deliverables:
• Project Schedule and Updates.
• Monthly Progress Reports.
• Meeting Agendas and Minutes.
Task 2. Field Work and Data Collection
Task 2.1 Survey [REMOVED 22.10.17]
Sampo Engineering, Inc. (Sampo) wi ll perform topographic survey for each proposed median location on Pmvay Re-ae. Sampo will recover and establish horizontal and vertical survey control at each site, perf~ field surveys, ;:md prepare a digital topographic survey. Sampo will establish horizontal site control on NAD U coord inates-a-M--He-fflto an existing City V€-F-t-i@.~ttafk . NAVD 88 Datum will be used for all draw ings.
The survey will indicate topograph-it data and surface culture to a minimum of 50' beyond the proposed lim its of '.Nork and will include collectioo of survey points on existing curb at 25' intervals, expected pavement joints, utility structures, changes in grade, drainage structures, and other critical points . Sampo •.viii search for and tie out right of way and centerline monuments of record . Sampo will analyze record ~ments at arrive at right-e-f.-way lines which will be included on the topographic plah Task 2.1 Deliverables:
- Digital Topographic Survey (Base Maps), Surface XML, and Data Point mes in Electronic Autocad J.Q.-format.
Task 2.2 As-Built Research & Utility Coordination
STC will coordinate with the City and utility companies to obtain utility base maps and plans. STC will request the City's current utility contacts upon receipt of NTP and proceed with requesting as-builts from each utility company expected to have utilities within the project area. STC will conduct a detailed field review with any available as-built information to verify the location of existing utilities to the greatest extent possible. This information will be reconciled with the base map created from the topographic survey to provide a comprehensive and accurate utility base for the traffic signal modification plans. STC will share any utility as-builts received with the City {as requested).
STC Tmfbf,:lf!lc. I Proposal for Poway Road Safety Improvements 8 November 15, 2022, Item #14
f
c, Poway Road Safety Improvements
STC will work with the City to coordinate with utility companies following the first plan submittal to begin utility conflict checks. Private utilities that are impacted require the local agency to prepare the Notice to Owner {LAPM 14-D) form and obtain acceptance and signatures from the private owner prior to submitting the right-of-way certification form to Caltrans. STC will prepare the LAPM 14-D for any utility relocations required and submit to the City for transmittal to each affected utility company.
It is not anticipated that any existing traffic signal service pedestal will be impacted as part of this project.
If there is a need to relocate or replace a pedestal, STC will work with the City to initiate the necessary work order requests with SDG&E.
Task 2.2 Deliverables:
• Utility As-Builts {As Requested).
• Completed LAPM 14-D {As Needed).
Task 2.3 Field Investigations
Utilizing as-built plans obtained in Task 2.2, STC will conduct detailed field reviews to verify existing conditions of each project intersection and proposed median locations. For each proposed median location, STC will review roadway geometrics, traffic signage/striping, curb markings and pavement condition.
For each traffic signal, STC will evaluate the condition of any existing conduit that could be used to pull new cable to confirm capacity and condition. STC will perform inspection level review of each traffic signal cabinet to verify existing control equipment and operability . STC will confirm that all existing vehicle detection equipment is functioning properly. Field notes and photos will be taken to document any discrepancies on the plans with field conditions.
STC's staff is uniquely equipped with the tools, certifications, and equipment necessary to properly test every element of the traffic signal system in the field to the component level. As an enhancement, STC is available to perform a full inspection of all components within the confines of the traffic signal cabinet and perform functional testing of the intersection's traffic control system to identify any components that need to be replaced, including the traffic signal controller, detection system, and Emergency Vehicle Preemption {EVP) system. For example, Model 170E controllers are no longer manufactured, as the industry has shifted to Advanced Transportation Controller {ATC) standards .
Task 2.3 Deliverables:
• Field Photos, Notes, and Traffic Signal Cabinet Inventories (As Requested by the City).
Task 3. Environ mental Documentation
STC will prepare the required environmental documentation in compliance with Caltrans LAPM. Senate Bill {SB) 137 allows the exchange of federal HSIP funds for State Highway Account {SHA) funds, therefore making it possible to fund HSIP projects with state funds.
STC Trtfffif,:lBc. I Proposal for Poway Road Safety Improvements 9 November 15, 2022, Item #14
Poway Road Safety Improvements
STC understands that all HSIP Cycle 10 projects are funded with state funds. State funded projects do not trigger National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance and therefore a Preliminary Environmental Study (PES} submittal is not required. Local HSIP projects must meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The implementing agency is the lead agency under CEQA and is responsible for self-certifying CEQA compliance.
This project is anticipated to be categorically exempt from CEQA compliance. STC will prepare a Notice of Exemption (NOE} form provided by State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR).
In addition, STC will assist in preparing the State of California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW} Environmental Document Filing form. It is anticipated that the City will submit both forms to San Diego County's Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk for filing . STC will assist the City in preparing any documentation required to Caltrans' District 11 Senior Environmental Planner or Branch Chief.
Task 3 Deliverables:
• CEQA NOE Form.
• CDFW Environmental Document Filing Form.
Task 4. Prepare Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) Task 4.1 Alternatives Analysis
STC will prepare a brief technical memo evaluating the dilemma zone detection type and boundary limits to be implemented with this project. STC will work with the City to determine the traffic signal controller software that will be utilized, and evaluate the software capability to perform dilemma zone detection operation. Based on the software capability, a recommendation for dilemma zone boundary will be provided based on review of standards and guidance documents.
A comparison of dilemma zone detection types (loops & hybrid video) will be provided along with their associated costs to aid the City in selecting the best solution. An identification of any existing components requiring upgrade to operate the dilemma zone detection will also be included in the memo.
There may be opportunities to reduce the amount of new conduit needed allowing for the allocation of cost savings to equipment or other upgrades. If this route is selected by the City, STC will coordinate with Caltrans to confirm if a scope change is required for the grant funding. As a value-added service, should a scope change be needed, STC will prepare the scope change request and required feasibility analysis using the HSIP analyzer and current crash data at no cost to the City.
Task 4.1 Deliverables:
• Draft and Final Alternatives Analysis.
• Scope change request and HSIP analyzer (If Needed}.
STC TrtffW,l lic. I Proposal for Poway Road Safety Improvements 10 November 15, 2022, Item #14
~ 4 0 Poway Road Safety Improvements
~
Task 4.2 Water Quality Compliance [REMOVED 22.10.17]
STC's Qualified S'A'PPP Practitioner (QSP) has reviewed the City's Stor-mwa-tef-ffi-hlke Form for t+i-€-€t-\l-+l Pf)ftion of the project and determined t:A-a-ht falls into the '.'..St-a-A41-f-El-.-P-roj€-€¥~category. Given that thG removal/replacement of impervious area 'Nill be less than 5,0D0 square feet, this will require preparation of a Storm \iVater Quality Management Plan (SVvQMP) for a Standard Project according to the City"s SVVQMP template, the City's JURMP and statewide Construction Storm Water requirements. Standafe water pollution control BMPs will apply during construction, including inlet protection, and will be detailed on the erosion control plans for the project. Due to the small footprint of the project, no permanent pollution control BMPs are proposed. The proposed narrow median extensions will be surfaced wi#t enhanced concrete to match that of other medians in the area. For t:Ri-5-reason, no permanent landscaping BHrrigation systems are proposed.
Task 4.2 Deliverables:
• Storm Water Quality Management Plan for Standard Project. • Completed Storm Water Intake Form .
Task 4.3 Final Plan Preparation
The STC Team will prepare plans for improvements identified in the original scope of work for traffic signal, roadway, signing and striping improvements. An AutoCad 3D base map will be created for select segments of the corridor to prepare the traffic signal and civil designs. Base maps will be prepare to show locations of existing curbs, sidewalks, gutter, existing utilities and right-of-way, at a level of detail necessary to complete the designs. We anticipate that the entire project will be constructed within the City's existing right of way, and no additional right of way acquisitions will be needed.
The design will be developed in conformance with the latest City of Poway requirements, Green Book and Caltrans Specifications and Standard Plans, California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices {CA MUTCD), and San Diego County Regional Standard Drawings.
Plans will be prepared utilizing AutoCAD software. All work identified on the plans will be approved and signed by a professional Civil Engineer registered in the State of California. Plans will be submitted at the 50%, 90%, and 100% design levels and will include the following:
Title, General Notes and Detail Sheets: The plans will be prepared in a single package with a Title Sheet, General Notes, and Construction Detail Sheets at the front end of the package, prepared on the City's standard sheet border . This task accounts for Title and General Notes sheets, and Detail Sheets are accounted for in their respective following subsections.
Traffic Signal Plans: STC will prepare plans for installation of dilemma zone detection for each project intersection at a scale of 1"=40' . Plans will identify all new and existing affected infrastructure, including pull boxes, conduit, cable, and cabinet equipment. Dilemma zone detection type and boundaries will be designed as determined in the alternative analysis produced in Task 4.1. It is anticipated 4 traffic signal improvement sheets will be needed based on initial assessment of dilemma zone boundaries included in STC Trb1fm, 26c. I Proposal fo r Poway Road Safety Improvements 11 November 15, 2022, Item #14
Powa y Road Safety Improvements
the understanding. If the need for upgraded communications equipment is identified through coordination with the City, equipment installation callouts and splice diagrams will be included on each plan.
Civil Improvement Plans: [REMOVED 22.10.17] ~ will prepare civil improvefficnt plans to successfully bid and construct the proposed median improvements at the four locations indicated. The civil plans-fof t he minor FRe di an modifications w i 11 be p r€-p-a-FetHfl----Atl.te-C~ty-t:it I e b Io ck sh c et s-a-t-~--5€ate tl-t-i+~vftlusly prepared survey as a base. The plans-wi-l+ indicate e><isting grades, proposed gracle-5, site demol+t-~a-alignments with horizontal cont-fe-l-5,--Af-tm-Ving, median paving, and constftl-Et-teft aetails. No drainage facilities are proposed, no profiles will be provided, and no util ity+e-locations will be needed based oA-our initial field reconnaissance. Plans will be prepared in accordance with City' of Powa-y standards, San Diego -Regi-onal Standards Drawings and locally accepted engineering practices, as a-p-pj-i-€able, stampe4-a+t4signed by a C/\ Registered Civil Engineer.
Signing and Striping Plans: [REVISED 22.10.17] This task will include preparation of signing and striping, and pin-on median design for four sections of Poway Road corridor. Plans will be prepared at 1" = 20' scale and will include multiple viewports on each plan sheet. The pin-on medians will be installed on the existing roadway surface and no civil improvements are anticipated. Signing and striping improvements will be designed as intended in the HSIP grant application and as required to comply with City and CAMUTCD requirements. STC will work with the City prior to beginning design to determine the pin-on materials desired.
Erosion Control Plan: [REMOVED 22.10.17] STC will prepare an Erosion Control Plan for a Standard Project wsed on the Citv's requirements. This will include development of a single sheet Erosion Control Plan v,ith typical placement of temporary-wa~tion control BMPs for the four r~ locations during construct ion. BMPs will be specified based on the City of Poway "BMP Design Manual" dated January 2022.
Task 4.3 Deliverables: [REVISED 22.10.17]
• Electronic Submittal (PDF} of 1-Title Sheet, 1-General Note/Detail Sheet, l--G-v-i-i Demo/Improvement Sheets, 1-Signing/Striping Sheet, 4-Traffic Signal Improvement Sheets, and 1 Erosion Control Sheet at the 50%, 90% and 100% design levels. • Mylar Submittal of 1-Title Sheet, 1-General Note/Detail Sheet, 2 Civil Demo/Improvement Sheets, 1-Signing/Striping Sheet, 4-Traffic Signal Improvement Sheets,----aRa---±--f-Fe-S-ieft.-{;e-R-trol Sheet. • Final Cadd files (AutoCadd 2019 or later version}.
Task 4.4 Project Specifications and Bid Documents
STC will prepare project specifications utilizing the City's most current boilerplate bid package for state funded projects, special provisions, and the latest edition of the Green book for Public Works Construction.
The bid package will be prepared via Microsoft Word and remain in the City's boilerplate font and format.
Project specifications and bid documents will include the bid item descriptions, preparation of bid schedule, applicable special provisions, and references to technical specifications.
STC Trnffof,2Bc. I Proposal for Poway Road Safety Improvements 12 November 15, 2022, Item #14
Poway Road Safety Improvements
Task 4.4 Deliverables:
• Project Specifications and Bid Documents at the 90% and 100% Design Levels.
Task 4.5 Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost The STC Team will provide an itemized engineer's estimate of probable cost at 50%, 90%, and 100% levels of design for all proposed improvements carried through to the final design stage of the project . The estimates will be detailed with unit prices and quantities for individual line items of work and specified equipment based on the historical cost index. Cost estimate details (items and descriptions) will be consistent with bid items and specification sections.
Task 4.5 Deliverables:
• Engineers Estimate and Backup Calculations at the 50%, 90% and 100% Design Levels.
Task 5. LAPM Construction Funding Allocation Request Support STC will prepare all necessary documents required for the Construction Funding Allocation Request {CON) in compliance with LAPM state funded HISP project implementation procedures. The following documents are anticipated to be included with the funding allocation request package for construction:
• Request for Funding Allocation Form
• Approved CEQA Notice of Exemption Documents (Scope Task 3) • Right-of-Way Certification
• State-only Finance Letter for Construction
• Detailed Engineer's Cost Estimate for Construction Items • Printout from List of Selected HSIP Projects Highlighting City's Project STC understands that no right-of-way acquisition is anticipated for this project. STC will prepare LAPM's right-of-way certification form well in advance prior to the construction funding allocation request submittal to avoid any setbacks. Any LAPM 14-D submitted to utility companies as part ofTask 2.2 will be included in the right-of-way certification submittal to Caltrans. It is anticipated that the City will submit all LAPM forms prepared by STC to Caltrans District 11 DLAE.
Task 5 Deliverables:
• Request for Funding Allocation Form {CON).
• Right-of-Way Certification Form.
• State-only Finance Letter for Construction.
• Detailed Engineer's Cost Estimate.
• Printout From List of Selected HSIP Project Highlighting City's Project.
STC Tr11ffo:( loc. I Proposal for Poway Road Safety Improvements 13 November 15, 2022, Item #14
c, Poway Road Safety Improvements
Task 6. Bidding and Construction Support
Task 6.1 Bid Support
STC will provide support during advertisement including answering pre-bid questions, and interpretations of the plans and specification either by email or phone. STC will provide responses to bidder's Requests for Information (RFls), and prepare up to two addenda, if necessary. STC will be available to answer questions by City staff and/or the bidders. STC will attend the pre-bid and pre-construction conferences, as requested.
STC will also provide design support during construction. This work will include responding to the contractor's RFls, conferring with the City's construction manager or inspector regarding RFls as appropriate, and reviewing shop drawings and material submittals . All bidding communication will be directed through the city for issuance to the contractor. STC will prepare design changes during construction as authorized, attend the pre-construction meeting, and be available to answer questions from City staff or the contractor.
Task 6.1 Deliverables:
• Responses to bidder's questions/RFls and Addenda in PDF Format.
Task 6.2 Co nstruction Support (STC)
STC will provide design support during construction . This work will include responding to the contractor's RFls, conferring with the City's construction manager or inspector regarding RFls as appropriate, and reviewing shop drawings and material submittals. All bidding communication will be directed through the city for issuance to the contractor. STC will prepare design changes during construction as authorized, attend the pre-construction meeting, and be available to answer questions from City staff or the contractor.
Task 6.2 Deliverables:
• Responses to Contractor's Submittals, Shop Drawings and RFls in PDF Format.
Task 6.3 Construction Support (Sampo - Optional Task)
As an optional task, if authorized, SAMPO will perform field survey to obtain as-built information following completion of construction. Additionally , SAMPO will process field data and draft as-built conditions of median curbs.
Task 6.3 Deliverables:
• Provide Updated CAD, XML and Data Point Files.
STC Tr2dfot,l5 c. I Proposal for Poway Road Safety Improvements 14 November 15, 2022, Item #14
Poway Road Safety Improvements
Task 6.4 Traffic Signal Programming [REMOVED 22.10.17]
STC 'Ni 11 prep a re updated sign a I ti rA-tfl-g-j:H-a-11 s tor each ~-i-A-E-l-HEk?-d-i I em ma zone E>f:)€-F~ STC 'Nill include leading pedestrian iffl:e.F.v.a+s----tef-Pm,vay Road/ Silver Lake Drive . STC wf.U perform the necessary signal tiFfl-i.n.g-~support upgrading to an ATC Type 2070~ necessary, and update clearance interv~-fO-F--€.a{,.:.J:, intersection to meet cuff€-f1-i:-~ a-s----needed. It is ant+c--i-f}-ated Omni eX~-te-f5ection control software w ill be neede4-a-t--e-a-c-f:i t-A-t-ersection to acconmi-edate the dilemrn a zone operations . This build of the software is anticip-atea-t&-ee released in October 2022 and will come with built in dilemma zone settings. STb---ftlaintains a fully functioning traffic ~ cabinets ~vith Tvpe 2070 controllers and componen-t-s--ift.. our shop, and our technicians wi ll-t:e-st--the signal timing a+1d phasing operations on t-fte-CBff-ect-l3-ttild of software to ensure field ready implementation . STC will configure detection in the controller programming and be available during traffic signal turn on to assist the ce+ttfactor with implementing and adjusting the traffic s-i-gRrtt programming.
Task 6.4 Deli'lerables:
• Bench Test Traffic Signal Timing Programs.
• Signal Timing Plan for Project lntersectfBfP.r.
...
Encinitas
I Encinitas
I
I
I
1 La Mesa
I
1 Menifee
National
City
HSIP Cycle 5
Fiber Optic Traffic Signal
Interconnect (El Camino Real
1 and Encinitas Blvd)
HSIP Cycle 5
! Fiber Optic Interconnect
I · 1
I I HSIP Cycle 7
I Upgrade Fiber Optic Signal
I Communication System
HSIP Cycle 7
Westside Wireless
Interconnect System
HSIP Cycle 6
Fiber Optic Interconnect
--T-Hf-f\--G;:l--&Li-~lf Needed).
Description
Upgrade traffic signals communication system along El Camino I Real and Encinitas Boulevard . I
1 Upgrade traffic signals communication system along various : corridors in the City (Leucadia, Encinitas, Hwy 101, Via , Cantebria, and Vulcan).
1 Teamed with Sampo Engineering
- ·- - -----
1 ~pgra?e f_iber opt!c traffic signal interconnect syste~ . · including installation of cable, controllers, BBS, monitoring : devices, and communication equipment to improve traffic I signal timing and coordination.
[ Team~d with Sam~o Engineering
I Install wireless interconnect system including radios, controllers, and related communication equipment upgrades ' , to improve safety and operations via optimized traffic signal timing coordination.
Upgrade traffic signals communication system along various corridors in the City (National City Blvd, 30thSt/Sweetwater Rd, Plaza Blvd, and Euclid Ave).
Teamed with Sampo Engineering
STC T!2ffix{ Mc. I Proposal for Poway Road Safety Improvements 15 November 15, 2022, Item #14
{
' / '
\ >-~....,:r-T'"
/". /
( f ",/~~ ~ /4~
Name
Category /Title
Fully Burdened Billing Rate
TASK No. DESCRIPTION
Task 1: Project Management and Coordination
Task 2: Field Work and Data Collection
2.2 As-Built Research and Utility Coordination
2.3 Field Investigation
Task 3: Environmental Documentation
Task 4: Prepare Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E)
4.1 Alternative Analysis
4.3 Improvement Plans
4.4 Specifications
4.5 Estimates
Task 5: LAPM Construction Funding Allocation Request Scope Task 6: Bid and Construction Support
6.1 Bid Support
6.2 Construction Support (STC)
TOTAL HOURS
Subtotal Labor:
TOTAL COST:
City of Poway: Poway Road Safety Improvements (RFP#23-00S) STC Traffic, Inc.
Jason Stack Christian Lambarth Phil Kern Adam Lemberg Joseph Walters Principal-in- Senior Project
Project Manager Principal Engineer Technical Project Engineer Charge Specialist $325.96 $194 .02 $245.37 $237.48 $147.46
2 15 - -
- 2 - - 5
- - 14
- 2 - - 5
- 2 - 3 8
6 18 12 28 70
- 4 2 2 8
- 2 - 2 5
- 2 - - 14
- 4 - 4 -
- 6 - 6 4
8 57 14 45 133
$ 2,607.68 $ 11,059.14 $ 3,435.18 $ 10,686.60 $ 19,612 .18 Ivan Gonzalez
Associate Engineer
$121 .07
-
12 18
-
22 170
-
-
-
-
-
222
$ 26,877 .54
17 $
19 $
32 $
7 $
35 $
304 $
16 $
9 $
16 $
8 $
16 $
479
$
$
3,562 .22
2,578 .18
4,243.70
1,125 .34
4,943 .70
45,946.10
2,921.46
1,600.30
2,452.48
1,726.00
3,178 .84
74,278 .32
74,278.32
!
r"I
Ql
n
~
3 CD
~
r"I
I\.
November 15, 2022, Item #14
EXHIBIT "B"
Cal Gov Code§ 7522.56
Deering's California Codes are current through all 1016 chapters of the 2018 Regular Session and the November 6, 2018 Ballot Measures.
I
Deering's California Codes Annotated> GOVERNMENT CODE> Title 1 General> Division 7 Miscellaneous > Chapter 21 Public Pension and Retirement Plans > Article 4 California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013
§ 7522.56. Provisions applicable to person receiving pension benefit from public retirement system; Section supersedes conflicting provisions (a)This section shall apply to any person who is receiving a pension benefit from a public retirement system and shall supersede any other provision in conflict with this section. (b) A retired person shall not serve, be employed by, or be employed through a contract directly by, a public employer in the same public retirement system from which the retiree receives the benefit without reinstatement from retirement, except as permitted by this section.
(c) A person who retires from a public employer may serve without reinstatement from retirement or loss or interruption of benefits provided by the retirement system upon appointment by the appointing power of a public employer either during an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business or because the retired person has skills needed to perform work of limited duration.
( d)Appointments of the person authorized under this section shall not exceed a total for all employers in that public retirement system of 960 hours or other equivalent limit, in a calendar or fiscal year, depending on the administrator of the system. The rate of pay for the employment shall not be less than the minimum, nor exceed the maximum, paid by the employer to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal an hourly rate. A retired person whose employment without reinstatement is authorized by this section shall acquire no service credit or retirement rights under this section with respect to the employment unless he or she reinstates from retirement. (e)
23 of 25
(l)Notwithstanding subdivision (c), any retired person shall not be eligible to serve or be employed by a public employer if, during the 12-month period prior to an appointment described in this section, the retired person received any unemployment insurance compensation arising out of prior employment subject to this section with 1 November 15, 2022, Item #14
Cal Gov Code§ 7522.56
a public employer. A retiree shall certify in writing to the employer upon accepting an offer of employment that he or she is in compliance with this requirement. (2)A retired person who accepts an appointment after receiving unemployment insurance compensation as described in this subdivision shall terminate that employment on the last day of the current pay period and shall not be eligible for reappointment subject to this section for a period of 12 months following the last day of employment.
(f)A retired person shall not be eligible to be employed pursuant to this section for a period of 180 days following the date of retirement unless he or she meets one of the following conditions:
24 of 25
(l)The employer certifies the nature of the employment and that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed position before 180 days have passed and the appointment has been approved by the governing body of the employer in a public meeting. The appointment may not be placed on a consent calendar. (2)
(A)Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, for state employees, the state employer certifies the nature of the employment and that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed state employment position before 180 days have passed and the appointment has been approved by the Department of Human Resources . The department may establish a process to delegate appointing authority to individual state agencies, but shall audit the process to determine if abuses of the system occur. If necessary, the department may assume an agency's appointing authority for retired workers and may charge the department an appropriate amount for administering that authority. (B)For legislative employees, the Senate Committee on Rules or the Assembly Rules Committee certifies the nature of the employment and that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed position before 180 days have passed and approves the appointment in a public meeting. The appointment may not be placed on a consent calendar.
(C)For employees of the California State University, the Trustees of the California State University certifies the nature of the employment and that the appointment is necessary to fill a critically needed position before 180 days have passed and approves the appointment in a public meeting. The appointment may not be placed on a consent calendar.
(3)The retiree is eligible to participate in the Faculty Early Retirement Program pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement with the California State University that existed prior to January 1, 2013, or has been included in subsequent agreements.
2 November 15, 2022, Item #14
Cal Gov Code§ 7522.56
(4)The retiree is a public safety officer or firefighter hired to perform a function or functions regularly performed by a public safety officer or firefighter. (g)A retired person who accepted a retirement incentive upon retirement shall not be eligible to be employed pursuant to this section for a period of 180 days following the date ofretirement and subdivision (f) shall not apply.
(h)This section shall not apply to a person who is retired from the State Teachers' Retirement System, and who is subject to Section 24214. 24214.5 or 26812 of the Education Code.
(i)This section shall not apply to (1) a subordinate judicial officer whose position, upon retirement, is converted to a judgeship pursuant to Section 69615, and he or she returns to work in the converted position, and the employer is a trial court, or (2) a retiree of the Judges' Retirement System or the Judges' Retirement System II who is assigned to .serve in a court pursuant to Section 68543.5.
History
Added Stats 2012 ch 296 § 15 (AB 340), effective January 1, 2013. Amended Stats 2013 ch 528 § 11 (SB 13), effective October 4, 2013 (ch 528 prevails); ch 76 § 75 (AB 383), effective January 1, 2013; Stats 2014 ch 238 § 1 (AB 2476), effective January 1, 2015.
Annotations
Notes
Amendments:
Note-
Amendments:
2013 Amendment:
Substituted (1) "have passed" for "has passed" in the first sentence of subds (f)(l) and (f)(2); (2) "or firefighter hired to perform a function or functions regularly performed by a public safety officer or firefighter" for "of firefighter" in subd (f)(4); and (3) "Judges' Retirement System" for "Judges' Retirement System I" in subd (i).
25 of 25 3
November 15, 2022, Item #14
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AG EN DA REPORT Cityof Poway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Audrey Denham, Director of Community Services.541)
Karen Tansey, Management Analyst �
(858) 668-4584 or [email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
Award of Contract for the Lake Poway Recreation Area Live Rainbow Trout Stock; Bid No. 23-004
The current contract to stock live rainbow trout in Lake Poway ended in June 2022. On September 21, 2022, the City opened a competitive Request for Bids (RFB). One bid was received, and with the current budget of $92,000, Wrights Rainbows LLC from Thatcher, Idaho is deemed the lowest responsible bidder. The term of this contract is two (2) years with the option to renew annually for three additional years.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council award the contract for the Lake Poway Recreation Area Live Rainbow Trout Stock to Wrights Rainbows LLC, the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $92,000 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract and all related documents.
Discussion:
The Lake Poway Recreation Area is a master-planned facility owned and operated by the City of Poway.
It provides potable water to the residents of Poway. Recreation operations and programming, including trout season, are managed by the Community Services Department.
The City of Poway's dam and reservoir project was funded through grants with the State of California Department of Water Resources under the Davis Grunsky Act. Davis Grunsky established the minimum operational guidelines required by the State for Lake Poway. These guidelines included an establishment plan, recreational plan, and the establishment of general fishery requirements.
While the grant requirements expire December 31, 2022, the City plans to continue to maintain both warm water game fish and trout. Trout season generally runs from early December through April or when the water temperature is suitable for live trout. Historically, trout are typically stocked on a bi weekly basis. Trout season at Lake Poway is very popular and attracts Poway residents and visitors 1 of 9
November 15, 2022, Item #15
across the region.
Revenue from fishing permits and boat rentals offsets the trout stock expenditure. The Lake's point of-sale system allows staff to report on data during particular time ranges and on specific types of purchases. All fishing permits sold during certain months are attributed to trout season and all boats categorized and sold as multi-hour fishing boats are also attributed to trout season during this same time period. Without taking into consideration operational costs, the FY 21-22 gross revenue that can be directly attributed to trout season was $109,659 (fishing permits $51,901; boating permits $57,758).
The City entered into the current contract with Chaulk Mound Trout Ranch on June 21, 2017, to provide rainbow trout and trout stocking services for the Lake Poway Recreation Area. In 2020, Chaulk Mound informe'd the City they were closing their business due partly to COVID-19, and would not re-open.
The City contacted local lakes to obtain the names of trout farms that were delivering to the area.
Wrights Rainbows delivered trout to Lake Jennings and had available trout to deliver to the City of Poway under the same delivery schedule as Lake Jennings. Wrights Rainbows completed the final three years of the contract that ended in June 2022 with a price per pound of $4.75.
On September 21, 2022, the City opened a competitive RFB. The FY 22-23 operating budget for live trout stock is $92,014. An RFB was issued requesting the maximum pounds of trout for a not-to exceed price of $92,000. The RFB was mailed out to six trout farms, posted on the City's website through E-bidboard, and advertised in the Poway News Chieftain. One farm immediately responded that they did not have enough trout to bid the job. Another farm was no longer in business.
On October 25, one bid was received and opened from Wrights Rainbows. The bid was complete and deemed the lowest responsible bid at $4.95 per pound for a total of 18,586 pounds. The contract (Attachment A) has a term of two (2) years with the option to renew annually for three additional years.
Environmental Review:
Tb_is item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review.
Fiscal Impact:
Sufficient funds are available in account 202020-45110 for the award of this contract.
Public Notification:
This RFB was published in the Poway News Chieftain on Thursday, October 6 and 13, 2022.
Attachments:
A. City of Poway Form of Contract Sale and Purchase of Good and Materials Reviewed/Approved By:
W�,K�
Assistant City Manager
2 of9
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney City Manager
November 15, 2022, Item #15
CITY OF POWAY
FORM OF CONTRACT
SALE AND PURCHASE OF GOODS AND MATERIALS
This Contract, entered into this 15th day of November, 2022, by and between the CITY OF POWAY, a general law city and municipal corporation (the "City"), and Wright's Rainbo ws, LLC, �n Idaho limited liability company, (the "Seller'').
1. Sale and Purchase.
Seller will sell, transfer and deliver to City, and City will accept and purchase from Seller at the location identified in Section 4, below, and in accordance with the Bid Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made part hereof, all of the goods, materials and other items in such quantities as City may require, of such specified sizes, quality and types, classifications, and minimum order for each shipment, as defined by the Department of Community Services, and as are identified in the Bid Schedule.
2. Price.
Seller agrees to invoice the goods and services, as it may apply, sold at the prices identified in Bid Sheet.
3. Payment.
The City shall make payment within 30 days of receipt of invoice after delivery of live rainbow trout. Payment shall be considered as having been made upon the date such payment is deposited in the U.S. Mail, first-class postage pre-paid and addressed to Seller.
4. Delivery.
Delivery shall be to the City of Poway Lake Poway Recreation Area at 14644 Lake Poway Road, Poway, CA 92064, on the dates and time agreed upon between the Hatchery Manager and the City's representative.
5. Supply and Output Capability of Seller.
If Seller is unable for any reason to supply City's requirements, Seller shall immediately notify City and provide its best estimate of the date of delivery/time and nature of stock, as it may apply. City may, at its sole and exclusive option, notify Seller in writing of City's decision to terminate the order without liability to the Seller. If the inability to supply City with its needs is not due to the negligence or faults of Seller, and Seller has notified City in writing as soon as Seller discovers the circumstances necessitating a revised delivery date, the termination of the order shall not entitle City to any damages.
6. Claims.
The shipment will be FOB Poway, CA at the address set forth in Section 4, above, with all delivery charges and claims for enroute -damage the responsibility of the Seller. 3 of9 ATTACHMENT A
November 15, 2022, Item #15
Evident damage to any fish will be indicated by a notation, which will, with the exception of concealed damages, be made by the carrier's agent on the delivery receipt before the receipt is signed for acceptance. The notation must clearly specify the extent of damage. Concealed damage must be reported to the carrier within 15 days of delivery.
7. Assignment and Delegation; Successors.
Neither Seller nor City shall assign any rights or delegate any obligations to the Contract without express written approval and acceptance of the other party. Any such assignment or delegation without express written approval and acceptance shall be null and void.
All terms, conditions and provisions of this bid proposal shall inure to and bind each of the parties hereto, and each of their successors in interest, executors, and administrators.
8. Indemnification.
Seller agrees to indemnify, defend by an attorney of the City's own choice, and save harmless, the City, and its elected and appointed officers, agents and employees (the "lndemnitees") against any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs and expenses of whatever nature, including reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements (collectively "Claims"), which lndemnitees may suffer or incur or to which lndemnitees may become subject by reason of or arising out of any injury to or death of any person(s), damage to property, loss of use of property, economic loss or otherwise occurring as a result of or allegedly caused by the City's use of the product and installation services sold by seller to City, provided that City has not altered or tampered with such product in any way and has used such product in accordance with Seller's or manufacturer's instructions and warnings.
If any action or proceeding is brought against lndemnitees by reason of any of the matters against which Applicant has agreed to indemnify lndemnitees as provided above, Applicant, upon notice from City, shall defend lndemnitees at Applicant's expense by counsel acceptable to City, such acceptance not to be unreasonably withheld. lndemnitees need not have first paid for any of the matters to which lndemnitees are entitled to indemnification in order to be so indemnified. The insurance required to be maintained by Applicant under Section 2, item 13 shall ensure Applicant's obligations under this section, but the limits of such insurance shall not limit the liability of Applicant hereunder. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.
The provisions of this section do not apply to Claims occurring as a result of this City's sole negligence or willful acts or omissions.
The parties agree to cooperate fully in the resolution of any claims for such liability, loss or damage.
9. Seller's Insurance.
The City shall be named as an additional insured with the bidder. Refer to the Insurance Code of the State of California. Evidence shall be furnished that the requirements of said code are met. Unless specified otherwise, the minimum requirements are as follows:
4 of 9
November 15, 2022, Item #15
• Comprehensive General Liability: $1,000,000 Bodily Injury & Property Damage combined each occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate;
• Automobile Liability, including owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles: $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit coverage;
• Workers' Compensation insurance: Per the statutory amount. • Endorsements: Endorsements shall be obtained so that each policy contains the following three provisions:
o Additional Insured. (Not required for Workers' Compens ation.) The City must be named as an "Additional Insured" on the policy. The Additional Insured Endorsement is generally a separate endorsement form and rarely is it acceptable to name the City as "Additional Insured" only on the face of the Insurance Certificate. A Blanket Endorsement form authorized by the Insurance Carrier is acceptable. The preferred language for the Endorsement form is: "City of Poway and its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, and employees are additional insured's with respect to this subject property and contract with City. 11 o Notice. "Said policy shall not terminate, nor shall it be canceled until thirty (30) days after written notice is given to City.
11 o Primary Coverage. "The policy provides primary coverage to City and its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, and employees. It is not secondary or in any way subordinate to any other insurance or coverage maintained by City."
The failure of bidder to provide City with insurance meeting all requirements of this Contract within 15 calendar days after the Award of Bid shall constitute a material breach of the Contract, entitling City to terminate the Contract.
All bonds and all insurance shall meet the following standards. The issuing company:
a. Shall be an "admitted surety" or an insurance company listed by the State Insurance Commissioner; and
b. Shall have a rating in the latest Best's Rating Guide of "A-" or better and Class VI or better; or be "treasury listed" for the size of risk to be undertaken.
In the event that the company does not satisfy subsection (b) above, the City Attorney or City Manager may only approve such company if the small size of the insurance or surety obligation or other risk factor justify approval, and satisfactory evidence is produced by the company that its financial responsibility and performance capability are sufficient to insure or secure adequately the risk obligation. (See City Council Resolution 90-082.)
10. Integration.
The terms of this Contract are intended by the parties to be the final expression of our agreement with respect to such terms and also as a complete and exclusive statement of such terms. Any documents prepared and issued by City in preparation for and preliminary to the award and execution of a Purchase Order are expressly made a part of this Bid. 5 of9
November 15, 2022, Item #15
However, in the event of any conflict between the written expressions of such prior documents and the written expressions of this document, the terms and interpretations given to the provisions of this writing shall prevail. No agreement, representation, or promise made by either party hereto, or by or to an employee, officer, agent or representative of either party, shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be bound thereby.
11. Applicable Law.
The order shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Any legal action brought to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be filed in a court of competent jurisdiction with San Diego County. Seller hereby waives any right to remove any action from San Diego County as is otherwise provided in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 394. In the event any legal action is taken by either party to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees and court costs from the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this order to be executed by their respective authorized representatives.
SELLER: ____________ _
Company Name
BY: -------------------
Signature of Seller's Authorized Represent ative
PRINT NAME: ---------------
CITY OF POWAY:
BY: -------------------
Chris Hazeltine, City Manager
Date: ------------------
ATTEST:
BY: Date: ----------------- -----------
Carrie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
6 of9
November 15, 2022, Item #15
Approved as to form:
BY: ----------------
Alan Fenstermacher,- City Attorney
7 of9
Date: 9/19/22 ----------
November 15, 2022, Item #15
8 of9
Quantit�
�I C?ilP
Exhibit A
!<!<TQ J3f; SUB!V!!TTJ:;D WITH ijXfSO.lJTE.Q CONTRACP;o; S.XH!B!T A�1
BID SCH�OlJI...I; f9r O!TY OF POWAY
L.AK!; POWAY R�CR�AT!QN AR�A
l-!VP RA!Nl3.QW TROUT STOCK
l3,� N9, 23,,Q04
UNIT Oescriptign UN!T PRICl:
Lb, L,,ive Rainbow Trout $ t;/-.q0
TOTAl/;1r
$82!000
�� A!! ggs.t§ fgr ge,!iv�ry i;trn tg Ile, llqrn� by u,� J;>jq(!�r, A!! appl!�a.ll!t:! fe,qe,rn!? l:!ta.t�? anq !g�a.! ta.��� a.r� re,§pgn§il;>iHty qf bigge,r,
TOTAL. AMQUNl Qf. l31P !N Fl§WR!;S; :=aN=ot=t=o=e=xc=-e=e==d =$==92=,o=o=o======= TOTAl-e AMOUNT OF �ll:l IN WOROSl. Ninety .. two thousand _DOLLARS �nd no C�NT$
��*-�*��****-*-�**'*-�*�����*�*-������������������*��*���*�**��*�***�*****�***�*�*���*�*******�*�*-!�*.���� _PEPQ$!T POLICY; ($h9W lt.�m f9r Rf;f�rnnc;i1;) tz:j. Gwnu0 -- :t,J6tf11.h fu,nb:wc,, !..L,G O�MURR.AG� PQl,JQY; ($tww !t�m fgr R1;ff;rnrw1;) ''-f=(.et. i1me ,, yY1{b f!J}Jtrtrrf:
?-,\Mnin� ttt'ld _fiQ1AC11Y_I../ nomnHU11('pifftrl \'\1ihif1 1J} �,PW? � t).J,/4'vv-j.
QQMP-ANY NAM!t
) LOO /t'j N- ±fw .. 1 ?r-/-.. I . -·
fu-/Qlw ,--:J:17 ct;?JUb
November 15, 2022, Item #15
9of9
1f:16-Lfk1--llvfP2 , l:Q'&-42a-lPhZ'??
ACCOUNT R�f-!Rg$�N,AT!Vg: =t=\4=n===nHr]���--- Sq�===ra==h====���-=�=== �f\�t-JaifJ/.;tw'� @-@YWf,i. eovn
November 15, 2022, Item #15
November 15, 2022, Item #16
AG EN DA REPORT City of Poway
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Carrie Gallagher, City Clerk ~
(858) 668-4435 or [email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Second Reading and Adopt ion of Ordinance 857 entitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, Amending Section 2.04.020 of The Poway Mun icipal Code to Increase Mayor and Council Compensat ion" Summary:
The introduct ion and first reading of the above-entitled Ordinance was approved at a Regular City Council Meeting on October 18, 2022. There were 2 speakers.
The Ordinance is now presented for second reading and adoption by title only Vote at first reading :
Recommended Action:
AYES:
NOES:
LEONARD, GROSCH, MULLIN
NONE
ABSTAINED: VAUS
ABSENT: FRANK
DISQUALIFIED: NONE
It is recommended the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 857.
Environmental Review:
None.
Fiscal Impact:
Approval of this item will result in an adjustment to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 operating budget and will reflect increased annual salary and related benefit costs of approx imately $20,560 (total salary cost is approximately $17,796).
Public Notification:
An ordinance summary notice was published in the Poway News Chieftain on Thursday, October 27, 1 of4
November 15, 2022, Item #16
2022. A certified copy of this Ordinance will also be posted in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code section 36933.
Attachments:
A. Ordinance No. 857
Reviewed/Approved By:
Assistant City Manager
2 of 4
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
c~
City Manager
ORDINANCE NO. 857
AN O
RDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.04.020 OF THE
POWAY MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE MAYOR AND
COUNCIL COMPENSATION
WHEREAS, Section 2.04.020 of the Poway Municipal Code sets forth the salary for the Mayor and each member of the City Council; and;
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 36516 allows Councilmember compensation to be increased by no more than five percent (5%) for each calendar year since the last increase became operative; and;
WHEREAS, the City Council last increased its salary by ordinance in 2018; and WHEREAS, thus, State law permits a maximum pay increase of twenty percent (20%); and
WHEREAS, the pay increase being adopted at this time equals 20%, with the Mayor retaining a 40% differential from the salaries of the remainder of the Council, pursuant to City policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct, and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2: Section 2.04.020(A)(1) of the Poway Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows, with deletions shown in strikethrough and additions shown in underline:
2.04.020 Compensation.
A. The Mayor and each member of the City Council shall receive compensation as follows:
1. Effective January 1, 2023, the Mayor shall receive as salary the sum of $1,922.43 $2,306.91 per month as authorized by Sections 36516 and 36516.1 of the Government Code and all other members of the City Council shall receive the sum of $1,373.161 $1,647.79 per month as authorized by Section 36516 of the Government Code payable at the same time and in the same manner as salaries that are paid to other officers and employees of the City.
SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall be codified.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after its adoption.
CERTIFICATION/PUBLICATION: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it or a summary of it, to be published with the names of the City Counci l 3 of 4
November 15, 2022, Item #16
members voting for and against the same in the Poway News Chieftain, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Poway within fifteen (15) days after its adoption and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with Government Code § 36933.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California, held the 18th day of October, 2022, and thereafter PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held the 15th day of November, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
________________________________
Steve Vaus, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Carrie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
4 of 4
November 15, 2022, Item #16
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA RE PQ RT City of Poway
November 15, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Alan Fenstermacher, City Attorney
[email protected]
Alan Fenstermacher, City Attorney
[email protected]
First Reading of Ordinance Amending Chapter 2.18 (Meetings)
CITY COUNCIL
The proposed ordinance (Attachment A) would make a minor amendment to Chapter 2.18 of the Poway Municipal
Code ("PMC") so that second readings of ordinances are placed on the consent calendar of the City Council's meeting agenda, consistent with state law as well as prior practice.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council introduce the Ordinance for first reading by title only, waive further reading, and schedule the adoption of the Ordinance for December 6, 2022.
Discussion:
As part of the City's progressive updates to outdated portions of its Municipal Code, in December 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 833 amending Chapter 2.18 of the PMC to reorganize meeting agendas and ensure this Chapter is otherwise consistent with state law, including the Ralph M. Brown Act ("Brown Act") (Government Code § 54950 et. seq.), which governs the City Council and other Council-appointed committee meetings. That prior ordinance had an unintended consequence of moving second readings of ordinances off of the consent calendar portion of City Council meetings, where they had previously been placed for many years, as is the case in many other cities in California.
The proposed ordinance (Attachment A) would make a minor amendment to Chapter 2.18 to clean this up, and reorganize City Council meeting agendas accordingly.
Environmental Review:
The adoption of the proposed Ordinance is not a "project'' that is subject to CEQA review because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
1 of 5
November 15, 2022, Item #17
Fiscal Impact:
None
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Ordinance
Reviewed/Approved By:
Wendy.Kaserman
Assistant City Manager
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
A:
�Ch s azel ·
City Manager
2 of 5
November 15, 2022, Item #17
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.18 OF THE
POWAY MUNICIPAL CODE (MEETINGS)
WHEREAS, City staff and the City Attorney's Office have been progressively analyzing the Poway Municipal Code ("PMC") and recommending updates where appropriate; and WHEREAS, revision of the procedures governing City Council meetings and public committee meetings is required in order to provide for the efficient transaction of public business.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POWAY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitations are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby approves this ordinance and amends certain sections of the PMC as specified below. Removals are indicated with strikethrough and additions are indicated with underline.
SECTION 3: Section 2.18.060(8) of Chapter 2.18 of the PMC is hereby amended as follows:
B. The business of the Council shall be taken up for consideration and disposition in the following order:
1. Call to order;
2. Roll call;
3. Pledge of Allegiance;
4. Moment of silence;
5. Presentations;
6. Public Comment;
7. Consent Calendar/Waiver of Ordinance Text Reading/Ordinances for Adoption;
8. Ordinances for Introduction;
9. Ordinances for /\doption;
4-0-c-9. Public Hearings;
44-:-1.Q,_ Staff reports;
42-:-1.:L Council initiated items;
ATTACHMENT A
3 of 5
November 15, 2022, Item #17
Ordinance No. ***