April 2, 2024, Item #8
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA RE PQ RT City of Poway
April 2, 2024
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Robert Manis, Director of Development Services f/4
Robert Manis, Director of Development Services
858-668-4601 or [email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
General Plan Amendment (GPA) 24-0001, Amendment to GPA 21-001 and 21-002; a Request to Adopt the City of Poway 2020-2029 Housing Element Each California municipality is required by Article 10.6 of the Government Code (Sections 65580- 65589.11) to adopt a housing element as a part of its general plan. Unique from other general plan elements, the housing element is subject to detailed statutory requirements and mandatory review by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). On August 3, 2021, the City Council approved the Draft 2020-2029 Housing Element. The City of Poway 2020-2029 Housing Element addresses statutory requirements and public feedback received during the review process.
Prior to the August 3, 2021 City Council public hearing, the City received comments from HCD on July 9, 2021 regarding an early submittal review. Staff worked with HCD to address their issues resulting in a formal submittal of a revised Draft Housing Element on October 30, 2022. After multiple submittals to HCD and conference calls with HCD staff, the Housing Element was submitted to HCD for the formal 60-day review on January 22, 2024. After two final edits were accepted, the City received a letter on March 13, 2024 stating the Housing Element meets the statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law. HCD requires the Housing Element be adopted by the City Council and submitted to HCD for final certification.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council take public input, close the public hearing, and adopt the resolution (Attachment A) approving GPA 24-0001 for the adoption of the City of Poway 2020-2029 Housing Element.
Discussion:
Background
State law requires local governments to meet housing goals by requiring all municipalities to prepare, implement, and update the housing element of its general plan. The Housing Element Update for the 1 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
City
of
Poway
covers
June
30,
2020
to
April
15,
2029.
The
previous
Poway
Housing
Element
(2010-
2020)
was
adopted
in
2013. The
Housing
Element
Update
is
similar
to
the
2010-2020
Housing
Element,
except
that
updates
were
made
in
accordance
with
revisions
to
State
housing element
guidelines
and
statutes
and
to
address
public
feedback.
The
updates
resulted
in
a
new
residential
sites
inventory
that
identifies
new
affordable
housing
sites.
The
Public
Safety
Element
is
also
in
the
process
of
being
updated
to
meet
the
requirements
of
Senate
Bill
(SB)
1035
which
includes
requirements
to
reduce
wildfire
risk.
The
Draft
Public
Safety
Element
is
anticipated
to
be
released
for
review
later
this
year.
Preparation
of
the
Housing
Element
Update
included
two
community
workshops,
a
City
Council
workshop,
a community
survey,
a 60-day
public
review,
a 30-day
Negative
Declaration
environmental
review,
and
continuous
coordination
with
HCD
.
The
City
notified
various
housing,
community,
and
special
interest
groups,
including
groups
serving
affordable
housing
and
special
needs
populations
about
the
Housing
Element
Update
public
outreach
opportunities
. Public
comments
and
feedback
from
HCD
were
considered
in
the
Housing
Element
Update.
On
May
4,
2021,
the
City
Council
held
a public
workshop
where
staff
provided
an
overview
of
the
draft
Housing
Element
Update
and
the
public
feedback
and
HCD
corrections
received
up
to
that
point.
Requested
edits
from
the
City
Council
public
workshop
included
resolving
edits
requested
by
HCD
and
adding
funding
sources
to
the
programs
as
recommended
by
the
San
Diego
Housing
Federation.
The
City
Council
authorized
submittal
of
the
Draft
Housing
Element
Update
to
HCD
for
a 60-day
review
required
prior
to
adoption.
On
May
10,
2021,
staff
submitted
the
draft
Housing
Element
Update
to
HCD
for
a 60-day
review
which
concluded
on
July
9,
2021.
City
staff
coordinated
with
HCD
staff
on
several
revisions
during
a
presubmittal
review
and
during
the
60-day
review
period;
the
resulting
document
is
the
Housing
Element
Update.
Feedback
on
the
draft
document
was
positive.
HCD,
however,
requested
additional
information
and
revisions
to
the
document
to
address
State
law.
Revisions,
as
of
June
25,
2021,
included:
•
Chapter
1,
expanded
and
updated
public
participation
information;
•
Chapter
2,
expanded
information
related
to
: affirmatively
furthering
fair
housing,
housing
in
need
of
rehabilitation,
demographic
data,
and
special
needs
households;
•
Chapter
3,
expanded
information
related
to
:
compliance
with
transparency
laws,
housing
development
projects
seeking
vesting
rights
pursuant
to
SB
330
(the
Housing
Crisis
Act
of
2019),
development
standards
in
the
Poway
Road
Specific
Plan
area
and
water
and
wastewater
capacity
to
accommodate
the
Regional
Housing
Needs
Assessment
(RHNA)
projections.
Provided
clarifications
on
exactions
(e.g
., requiring
street
improvements),
fees,
construction
in
Very
High
Fire
Hazard
Severity
Zones
(VHFHSZ),
reasonable
accommodations,
market
constraints,
and
code
compliance
procedures;
•
Chapter
4,
provided
information
on
RHNA
credits,
development
trends,
site
availability,
capacity
assumptions,
opportunities
for
lot
consolidation,
site
analysis
effects
on
furthering
fair
housing,
and
financial
sources
for
the
development
of
housing;
•
Chapter
5,
provided
clarifications
on
programs
for
residents
with
special
needs;
•
Chapter
6,
provided
information
and
objectives
related
to:
housing
for
special
needs
groups,
financial
sources
for
the
development
of
housing,
construction
monitoring
for
accessory
dwelling
units
(ADUs),
parking
constraints,
and
housing
preservation.
Provided
clarifications
on
contributing
factors
to
affirmatively
furthering
fair
housing.
Added
objective
standards
2 of
56 April 2, 2024, Item #8
and
procedures
for
allowing
large
residential
care
facilities
and
group
homes
for
seven
or
more
persons
in
all
residential
zones
and
allowing
employee
housing
for
six
or
fewer
persons
subject
to
regulations
that
apply
to
other
residential
dwellings
of
the
same
type
in
the
same
zone.
On
July
9,
2021,
the
City
received
a letter
from
HCD
which
included
corrections
to
address
all
statutory
requirements
(Attachment
B).
These
corrections
were
generally
new
comments
provided
on
the
Draft
Housing
Element
Update.
Staff
submitted
revisions
to
address
comments
in
the
July
9,
2021
letter
from
HCD
after
several
discussions
and
informal
submittals
to
HCD
for
review.
Recommended
changes
were
incorporated
into
the
Housing
Element
Update
prior
to
formal
submittal
to
HCD
on
October
30,
2022
for
a 90-day
review.
Findings State
law
requires
local
governments
to
adequately
plan
for
the
housing
needs
of
all
economic
segments
(very
low,
low,
moderate,
and
above
moderate-income
households)
of
the
municipality.
The
law
states
that
all
jurisdictions
must
adopt
land
use
plans
and
regulatory
systems
which
provide
opportunities
for,
and
do
not
constrain,
housing
development.
Government
Code
Section
65583
states
that
each
jurisdiction
in
the
State
is
required
to
update
its
housing
element
to
accommodate
its
fair
share
of
regional
housing
needs.
A
major
component
of
the
housing
element
is
the
RHNA.
The
RHNA
prepared
and
allocated
by
the
San
Diego
Association
of
Governments
(SAN
DAG)
and
accepted
by
HCD,
is
the
total
number
of
housing
units
needed
to
meet
the
regional
demand.
Each
jurisdiction
is
required
to
accommodate
its
fair
share
of
units.
To
accommodate
means
that
zoning
is
in
place
and
sites
are
identified
where
the
units
could
be
located
. It
does
not
require
that
the
units
be
produced.
The
housing
unit
share
is
identified
by
income
categories
-very
low
(including
extremely
low),
low,
moderate,
and
above
moderate.
The
current
RHNA
is
an
eight-year
cycle
Uune
30,
2020
-April
15,
2029)
.
Poway's
housing
element
cycle
is
aligned
with
other
jurisdictions
in
the
San
Diego
region
as
all
are
required
to
update
their
housing
elements
at
the
same
time.
Poway's
fair
share
of
the
RHNA
is
1,319
units.
Poway
received
an
increase
(up
from
1,253
units)
from
the
previous
fifth
housing
element
cycle.
The
table
below
details
the
housing
unit
distribution
for
Poway
and
the
San
Diego
region
in
all
four
income
categories
as
required
by
State
law
for
the
2020-2029
housing
cycle.
3 of
56 Regional
Housing
Needs
Assessment
(RHNA)
6/30/20
to
4/15/29
Percent
of
Poway
Tota11
Total
Housing
Units
1,319
100%
Ve,y
Low
3 468
35.5%
Low
268
20.3%
Moderate
241
18.3%
Above
Moderate
342
25.9%
1SANDAG
Final
RHNAfor
the
City
of
Poway
2HCD
RHNA
Determination
for
the
San
Diego
Region
350%
to
be
Extremely
Low
Income
Region 171,685 42,332 26,627 29,734 72,992
Percent
of
Total2 100% 24.7% 15.5% 17.3% 42.5%
April 2, 2024, Item #8
The housing element is designed to provide the City with a coordinated and comprehensive strategy for promoting the production of safe, decent and affordable housing within the community. The housing element presents a plan to achieve the City's housing goal while meeting the requirements of the State of California (Article 10.6 of the Government Code) and includes:
• Analysis of the previous housing element (2010-2020) and current housing factors (physical, fisca I, regulatory);
• Identification of constraints to achieving the housing goal including constraints to furthering fair housing; and
• Proposed modifications and refinements to the objectives, policies and programs identified in the 2010-2020 Housing Element.
Based on past success of affordable housing developments in the city, many of the goals and strategies identified in the 2010-2020 Housing Element will continue to be included in the Housing Element Update. The Housing Element Update programs in Chapter 6 address existing and new legislation pertaining to housing for special needs (emergency homeless shelters, transitional housing, supportive housing, low barrier navigation centers, etc.), Density Bonus law, SB 35 Permit Streamlining processes, No Net Loss provisions, updating the Public Safety Element, monitoring housing production during the RHNA cycle, and furthering fair housing. Many of the programs in the Housing Element have been updated based on previously discussed public comments, HCD recommendations to address State mandates and/or staff recommendations. Some of the notable policies and programs in the Housing Element Update, most of which can be implemented through adopted General Plan policies or with the adoption of Specific Plans, include:
• Encourage State and Federal agencies to reduce constraints to the provision of housing; • Encourage the State to allow cities to implement their RHNA and implement their visions for their communities without State intervention and provide sufficient funding for affordable housing;
• Continue to encourage SAN DAG and Caltrans to provide a multi-modal transit corridor along Scripps Poway Parkway and the SR-67 corridors to increase access to jobs and areas of opportunity;
• Discourage short term rental of one or more rooms or whole homes on a daily or weekly basis to preserve permanent housing;
• Encourage additional housing choices through the development of the Poway Road Specific Plan (PRSP).;
• Encourage diverse housing design with varying architectural styles, roof and siding materials, colors, and architectural projections while maintaining compatibility and unifying elements with the architecture in the surrounding area;
• Encourage building heights scaled to surrounding structures, increased landscape and trees, and private and common active and passive open space in housing projects; • Encourage connections (connectivity) between housing and essential services, parks, trails and related amenities promoting outdoor walking and biking opportunities; • Encourage traffic safety and reduced congestion with appropriate analysis as a part of new housing projects;
• Encourage the development of multigenerational housing through ADUs and junior ADUs; • Encourage safety within housing developments through Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), including increased pedestrian scale lighting; • Require new housing units in VHFHSZs to provide adequate fire access and suppression; 4 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
• Ensure housing construction includes sufficient access including adequate street widths and load capacity along rural streets and curb, gutter, and sidewalk with street trees along nonrural streets;
• Require trail easements and related trail improvements and connections for appropriate use as a part of new housing unit construction to promote health and wellness and connectivity; • Create objective design standards for new housing projects as determined by the City Council.
As with the 2010-2020 Housing Element, the elimination of the redevelopment agency has had a profound impact on the City's affordable housings efforts. Redevelopment funds were a major funding source for affordable housing developments in the city. Based on past success of affordable housing developments in the city, many of the goals and strategies identified in the 2010-2020 Housing Element will continue to be included in the Housing Element Update. A critical factor to the actual production of affordable housing units will continue to be the identification of funding for housing and related programs.
The Housing Element Update consists of the following Chapters:
• Chapter 1 -Introduction: Provides a brief overview of the purpose and background for the Housing Element Update. It also includes State requirements with recent legislative amendments, a list of HCD required components, and a summary of public outreach and participation.
• Chapter 2 -Community Profile: A profile and analysis of the City's demographics, housing characteristics, existing and future housing needs, and a fair housing assessment per Assebmly Bill (AB) 686 that analyzes and addresses constraints to fair housing choice and includes impediments imposed by the State and federal governments. As required by HCD, the fair housing assessment includes an analysis of integration and segregation patterns and trends, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs within the jurisdiction including displacement risk.
• Chapter 3 -Constraints: An analysis of constraints to housing production and retention, including various market, governmental, and environmental limitations to meeting Poway's identified housing needs. Provisions for housing for special needs and constraints related to ADUs and providing housing within the Poway Road Specific Plan and the Farm in Poway Specific Plan areas are included. Constraints related to VHFHSZs is included (e.g., 30-foot setbacks). A new section on wildfire risk constraints is included. • Chapter 4 -Housing Resources: An overview of resources available to accommodate and provide housing for all income levels, including land available for new construction and financial and administrative resources available for housing in Poway. This chapter includes the new residential sites inventory to accommodate the RHNA. The RSI includes prospective AD Us, sites owned by the City or Poway Housing Authority, and Poway Road Specific Plan sites to meet the needs of the RHNA at all income levels. Villa De Vida (54 units), Poway Commons (97 units), and Apollo Apartments (43 units) are in the "Under Construction" section of the RSI.
The State allows Poway to meet its housing needs with sites that allow for up to 30 dwelling units per acre. No rezoning is proposed, and previous sites poised to be rezoned with the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ) were abandoned since the Poway Road Specific Plan 5 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
sites
provide
sufficient
density
to
meet
State
requirements
.
HCD
provided
the
City
credit
in
the
RHNA
for
Fairfield
(212
units),
The
Farm
in
Poway
(160
units),
and
the
Outpost
(53
units).
Other
projects
not
in
the
RSI
are
accounted
for
in
the
Additional
Above
Moderate-Income
Sites
Inventory
(Attachment
A
of
the
Housing
Element
Update).
•
Chapter
5 -
Program
Accomplishments:
An
assessment
of
past
accomplishments
and
an
evaluation
of
programs
that
should
be
continued,
modified,
or
added
in
the
new
housing
cycle.
During
the
2010
to
2020
RHNA
planning
cycle,
488
of
the
1,253
housing
units
allocated
in
the
RHNA
were
constructed.
While
housing
needs
at
the
very
low
and
low-income
affordability
levels
were
met,
10 of
the
100
extremely
low-income
affordable
units
allocated
were
met.
•
Chapter
6 -
Housing
Plan:
Outlines
the
City's
overall
housing
goals,
objectives,
policies,
and
programs
over
the
housing
cycle
(2020-2029),
and
addresses
the
City's
identified
housing
needs
and
requirements
to
comply
with
State
law.
After
completion
of
the
90-day
review
by
HCD,
staff
worked
with
HCD
staff
through
meetings
and
informal
submittals
to
address
the
issues
they
had
raised.
Most
of
the
revisions
requested
focused
on
the
issues
that
were
raised
in
the
July
9,
2021
letter.
After
discussions
and
negotiations,
language
was
included
to
address
the
few
remaining
issues
that
HCD
had.
Prior
to
resubmittal
to
HCD
for
the
required
formal
60-day
review,
state
law
requires
the
housing
element
to
be
available
for
public
review
for
seven
days.
The
updated
Housing
Element
was
posted
on
the
City's
website
and
notice
was
sent
to
the
list
of
interested
parties
that
has
been
established
for
this
project.
The
Housing
Element
was
sent
to
HCD
on
January
22,
2024
for
the
60-day
review
along
with
two
letters
received
during
the
seven
day
public
review
period (Attachment
CJ.Just
prior
to
submittal
for
review,
the
City
received
one
final
edit
request
from
HCD
regarding
residential
care
facilities
for
seven
or
more
residents,
which
was
acceptable
to
the
City.
On
March
13,
2024,
the
City
received
a
letter
stating
that
the
Housing
Element
update
meets
the
statutory
requirements
of
State
Housing
Element
Law
and
will
substantially
comply
with
State
Housing
Element
Law
when
it
is
adopted
by
the
City
Council
and
submitted
to
and
approved
by
HCD
(Attachment
D).
The
2020
to
2029
Housing
Element
is
available
for
viewing
on
the
City's
website
(see
Attachment
E for
the
link).
Revisions
made
since
the
August
3,
2021
approval
are
based
on
the
July
9,
2021
letter
from
HCD
and
are
generally
summarized
as
follows:
•
Suitability
of
Nonvacant
Sites:
In
the
most
recent
Housing
Element
Update,
additional
information
was
added
to
explain
how
sites
in
the
residential
site
inventory
that
are
wholly
or
partially
developed
have
the
potential
for
redevelopment.
Examples
include
the
age
of
the
existing
structures,
zoning
within
the
Poway
Road
Specific
Plan,
size
of
the
parcel,
number
of
parking
spaces,
and
similarity
to
other
housing
projects
completed
within
the
same
zone
.
Additionally,
it
is
noted
that
there
is
limited
vacant
land
available
and
that
most
rural
lots
are
not
feasible
for
higher
density
or
affordable
housing.
•
Realistic
Capacity:
The
Housing
Element
Update
assumed
full
build
out
and
capacity
for
housing
on
some
sites
. Information
was
added
to
clarify
why
for
some
properties
it
was
assumed
that
proposed
housing
developments
would
be
at
full
capacity,
including
providing
information
on
the
increased
density
allowed
in
the
Poway
Road
Specific
Plan
and
the
higher
densities
that
are
being
developed
since
its
adoption.
Language
was
added
to
support
the
6 of
56 April 2, 2024, Item #8
determination.
For
example,
the
Poway
Road
Specific
plan
allows
up
to
35 dwelling
units
per
acre
with
incentives
and
community
benefits.
•
Updates
to
Chapter
6 Programs:
Information
was
provided
on
how
the
housing
programs
will
meet
timeline
targets,
geographic
targets,
and
established
metrics
to
set
realistic
and
specific
goals
for
housing
programs.
Examples
include
targeting
rental
and
owner
financial
assistance
to
foster
fair
housing
and
using
lower
density
lands
to
provide
further
opportunities
for
ADU
development.
ADU
projects
are
streamlined
and
non-discretionary;
therefore,
the
review
cycle
is
shorter
than
other
projects.
Commitments
are
included
to
proactively
reach
out
to
nonprofit
organizations,
special
needs
communities,
churches,
and
religious
institutions
regarding
housing
development
opportunities.
•
Governmental
Constraints:
More
information
is
provided
in
Chapter
3 discussing
the
design
review
process.
This
includes
the
City
offering
pre-applications
and
pre-development
conferences
free
of
cost
and
the
fact
that
Poway
does
not
have
a planning
commission.
Given
that
Poway
is
a
smaller
organization,
staff
is
available
to
meet
with
applicants
to
determine
what
steps
need
to
be
taken
to
get
a
project
started.
•
Housing
Programs:
More
committal
language
was
added
to
the
Housing
Element
by
removing
language
such
as
"consider"
or
"review"
to
create
concrete
actions
to
assist
in
the
development
of
housing
for
persons
with
special
needs.
This
includes
changing
the
Conditional
Use
Permit
(CUP)
requirements
for
residential
care
facilities
for
seven
or
more
residents
and
prioritizing
accessibility
for
special
needs groups
in
projects
involving
the
Poway
Housing
Authority
.
Community
Development
(Land
Use)
Element
Text
Amendment
(GPA
21-002)
Staff
also
recommends
a
minor
modification
to
the
Community
Development
(Land
Use)
Element
of
the
General
Plan
to
be
consistent
with
the
Housing
Element
Update
.
A
strikeout/underline
of
the
proposed
text amendment
references
the
Housing
Element
Update
and
the
RHNA
for
the
sixth
cycle
in
the
General
Plan
amendment.
The
revised
language
is
included
the
Resolution
(Attachment
A).
Environmental
Review:
As
required
under
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act
(CEQA),
an
Environmental
Initial
Study
(EIS)
was
completed
for
the
project.
The
EIS
determined
that
the
project
would
not
have
a
significant
impact
on
the
environment and,
therefore,
does
not
require
any
mitigation.
A
Negative
Declaration
(ND)
was
prepared.
The
EIS
and
draft
ND
were
sent
to
the
State
Clearinghouse
for
distribution
and
review
by
relevant
state
agencies
(State
Clearinghouse
#2021060520)
for
a
required
30-day
public
review
and
comment
period
prior
to
the
August
3,
2021
City
Council
hearing.
The
ND
was
approved
by
the
City
Council
on
August
3,
2021
pursuant
to
Resolution
No.
21-067
(Attachment
F).
The
ND
is
adequate
to
address
the
Housing
Element
Update,
including
the
revisions
that
have
been
made.
Pursuant
to
Section
15162
of
the
CEQA
guidelines,
no
further
environmental
review
is
required
.
Fiscal
Impact:
None. 7
of
56 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Public
Notification:
A
Notice
of
Public
Hearing
was
published
in
the
Poway
News
Chieftain
on
Thursday,
March
21,
2024.
The
notice
was
also
posted
on
the
City's
website
with
notification
e-mailed
to
all
names
on
the
list
of
interested
parties.
Attachments: A.
Resolution
approving
General
Plan
Amendment
24-0001
B.
HCD
Correction
Letter,
dated
July
9,
2021
C.
Letters
submitted
during
seven-day
review,
dated
January
2024
D.
HCD
letter
regarding
compliance
with
Housing
Element
Law,
dated
March
13,
2024
E.
City
of
Poway
2020-2029
Housing
Element
(on
file
in
the
Office
of
the
City
Clerk)
General
Plan
I Poway.
CA
-Official
Website
F.
Resolution
No.
21-067
adopting
a
Negative
Declaration
for
the
Housing
Element
Update
Reviewed/Approved
By:
Assistant
City
Manager
8 of
56 Reviewed
By:
Alan
Fenstermacher
City
Attorney
Approved
By:
Chris
Hazeltine
City
Manager
April 2, 2024, Item #8
RESOLUTION NO. 24-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT (GPA) 24-0001 (AMENDMENT TO GPA 21-001
AND GPA 21-002) FOR THE ADOPTION OF CITY OF POWAY
2020-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT
WHEREAS, State Law requires that cities periodically update the Housing Element of the General Plan;
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65350, et. seq., describes the procedures for amending the General Plan;
WHEREAS, the City of Poway 2020-2029 Housing Element has been prepared pursuant to Article 10.6, Sections 65580-65589.11 of the California Government Code; WHEREAS, the City has held community workshops on the Housing Element Update on November 19, 2020 and April 29, 2021, a City Council Workshop on May 4, 2021, a public housing and public safety element survey, a 20-day Housing Element review, a 30-day State Clearinghouse Negative Declaration environment review, and numerous informal reviews and a 60-day formal review with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to solicit public comment and has also notified community and special interest groups serving affordable housing and special needs populations about the public outreach opportunities that have been conducted throughout the process as further described in Chapter 1 of the Housing Element;
WHEREAS, on May 4, 2021, the City Council held a duly advertised public meeting and authorized submittal of the Draft 2020-2029 Housing Element to HCD for 60-day review and comment;
WHEREAS, on July 9, 2021, the City received a letter from HCD, which included written findings stating that the Draft 2020-20209 Housing Element does not address all statutory requirements with corrections provided to address all statutory requirements; WHEREAS, an Environmental Initial Study (EIS) and Negative Declaration (ND) for the 2020-2029 Housing Element was circulated for a required 30-day public review and comment period beginning on June 24, 2021 and ending on July 24, 2021, in accordance with California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15105. The EIS and draft ND were sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution and review by relevant state agencies (State Clearinghouse #2021060520) for required 30-day public review and comment period. City Council has considered the EIS and ND, and public comments received on the EIS and ND; WHEREAS, the 2020-2029 Housing Element requires that the City also amend the City's General Plan. Text amendments to the Community Development (Land Use) Element of the General Plan have been prepared that are necessary for consistency with the City of Poway 2020- 2029 Housing Element;
WHEREAS, on August 3, 2021, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing and approved Draft 2020-2029 Housing Element (GPA 21-001 and GPA 21-002) and adopted the ND for the project;
9 of 56 ATTACHMENT A
April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution No. 24-
WHEREAS, the Draft 2020-2029 Housing Element was submitted to HCD for review on October 30, 2022;
WHEREAS, City staff worked with HCD to address their issues and made revisions to the 2020-2029 Housing Element;
WHEREAS, on January 22, 2024, the revised 2020-2029 Housing Element was submitted to HCD for a formal 60-review;
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2024, the City received a letter from HCD stating that the revised 2020-2029 Housing Element meets the statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law;
WHEREAS, on April 2, 2024, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to receive testimony from the public both for and against, relative to this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered the agenda report for.the proposed project, including the attachments, and has considered all other evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council considered the ND (EA 21-001) adopted on August 3, 2021, for the Draft 2020-2029 Housing Element. The ND is adequate to address the revisions made to the 2020-2029 Housing Element. In accordance with Section 15162 of the CEQA guidelines, no further environmental review is required.
SECTION 3: The City Council hereby approves GPA 24-0001 for adoption of the 2020- 20259 Housing Element incorporated herein by reference and amending the Community Development (Land Use) Element of the General Plan as specified below. Removals are indicated with strikethroughs and additions are indicated with underline.
SECTION 4: Page five, "Land Use Plan" section, paragraph four, of the Community Development (Land Use) Element of the General Plan (GPA 21-002) shall be amended as follows:
For the ~ 2020-2029 planning period for the Housing Element, the City was assigned a future housing need goal of~ 1,319 housing units (see Table 4-1 of the Housing Element).
The City is not required to build these units, but must show it has sites with adequate zoning and development standards that could accommodate the housing units during the planning period.
Table 4-4 4-5 in Chapter 4 of the Housing Element contains a site inventory for Very Low, Low and Moderate Income households demonstrating that there are adequate sites to meet the regional housing goal with the placement of the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ) on the sites as discussed in Chapter 4 of the Housing Element
SECTION 5: The City Council hereby authorizes the 2020-2029 Housing Element incorporated herein by reference to be submitted to HCD for final certification. 10 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution No. 24-
SECTION 6: Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted each section subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact of any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 2nd day of April, 2024 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
Steve Vaus, Mayor
ATTEST:
Carrie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
11 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
STATE
OF
CAL
IEORNIA
-BUSINESS
CONSUMER
SERVICES
AND
HOUSING
AGENCY
DEPARTMENT
OF
HOUSING
AND
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
OF
HOUSING
POLICY
DEVELOPMENT
2020
W.
El
Camino
Avenue
. Su
ite
500
Sacramento,
CA
95833
(916)
263-2911
/ FAX
(916)
263
-7453
www
.hcd
.ca.go
v
July
9,
2021
Bob
Manis
, Director
of
Development
SeNices
Development
SeNices
Department
City
of
Poway
13325
Civic
Center
Drive
Poway,
CA
92064
Dear
Bob
Manis:
GAVIN
NEWSOM
Gavemor
RE:
Review
of
the
City
of
Poway's
6 th
Cycle
(2021-2029)
Draft
Housing
Element
Thank
you
for
submitting
the
City
of
Poway's
(City)
draft
housing
element
received
for
review
on
May
10,
2021
along
with
revisions
received
on
June
25,
2021
. Pursuant
to
Government
Code
section
65585,
subdivision
{b),
the
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development
(HCD)
is
reporting
the
results
of
its
review
. Our
review
was
facilitated
by
a
telephone
conversation
on
June
23,
2021
with
David
De
Vries,
City
Planner;
Austin
Silva,
Senior
Planner;
Scott
Nespor,
Associate
Planner;
and
Polina
Mitcheom,
Planning
Intern.
In
addition,
HCD
considered
comments
from
Chris
Cruse
pursuant
to
Government
Code
section
65585
, subdivision
(c)
.
The
draft
element
addresses
many
statutory
requirements;
however,
revisions
will
be
necessary
to
comply
with
State
Housing
Element
Law
(Article
10.6 of
the
Gov.
Code)
. In
particular,
the
Affirmatively
Furthering
Fair
Housing,
sites
analysis,
and
programs
sections,
amongst
other,
need
revisions
to
fully
comply
with
State
Housing
Element
Law.
The
enclosed
Appendix
describes
these,
and
other
revisions
needed
to
comply
with
State
Housing
Element
Law
.
As
a
reminder,
the
City's
6th
cycle
housing
element
was
due
April
15,
2021.
As
of
today
,
the
City
has
not
completed
the
housing
element
process
for
the
6th
cycle
. The
City's
5th
cycle
housing
element
no
longer
satisfies
statutory
requirements
. HCD
encourages
the
City
to
make
revisions
to
the
element
as
described
herein,
adopt,
and
submit
to
HCD
to
regain
housing
element
compliance.
As
a
reminder
, pursuant
to
Government
Code
section
65583.3,
the
City
must
submit
an
electron
ic
sites
inventory
with
its
adopted
housing
element.
The
City
must
utilize
standards
,
forms,
and
definitions
adopted
by
HCD.
Please
see
HCD's
housing
element
webpage
at
https
://www
.hc
d.ca
.gov
/co
mmun
ity-develop
m
ent/hous
ing-element/index
.shtml
for
a
copy
of
the
form
and
instructions
. The
City
can
reach
out
to
HCD
at
site
sinventory@hcd
.ca.qov
for
technical
assistance
.
12 of
56 ATTACHMENT
B
April 2, 2024, Item #8
Bob
Manis,
Director
of
Development
Services
Page2 To
remain
on
an
eight-year
planning
cycle,
the
City
must
adopt
its
housing
element
within
120
calendar
days
from
the
statutory
due
date
of
April
15,
2021
for
San
Diego
Association
of
Governments
(SAN
DAG)
localities
. If
adopted
after
this
date,
Government
Code
section
65588,
subdivision
(e)(4),
requires
the
housing
element
be
revised
every
four
years
until
adopting
at
least
two
consecutive
revisions
by
the
statutory
deadline.
For
more
information
on
housing
element
adoption
requirements,
please
visit
HCD's
website
at:
http
://www
. hcd
. ca
.gov
/c
ommunity
-deve
lopment/hou
sing
-element/housing-e
lement
memos
/doc
s/sb375
final
100
413
.pdf
.
Public
participation
in
the
development,
adoption
and
implementation
of
the
housing
element
is
essential
to
effective
housing
planning.
Throughout
the
housing
element
process,
the
City
should
continue
to
engage
the
community,
including
organizations
that
represent
lower-income
and
special
needs
households,
by
making
information
regularly
available
and
considering
and
incorporating
comments
where
appropriate.
Several
federal,
state,
and
regional
funding
programs
consider
housing
element
compliance
as
an
eligibility
or
ranking
criteria.
For
example,
the
CalTrans
Senate
Bill
(SB)
1 Sustainable
Communities
grant;
the
Strategic
Growth
Council
and
HCD's
Affordable
Housing
and
Sustainable
Communities
programs;
and
HCD's
Permanent
Local
Housing
Allocation
consider
housing
element
compliance
and/or
annual
reporting
requirements
pursuant
to
Government
Code
section
65400.
With
a
compliant
housing
element,
the
City
meets
housing
element
requirements
for
these
and
other
funding
sources. HCD
appreciates
the
responsiveness
and
dedication
David
De
Vries,
Austin
Silva,
Scott
Nespor,
and
Polina
Mitcheom
provided
during
the
course
of
our
review.
We
are
committed
to
assisting
the
City
in
addressing
all
statutory
requirements
of
State
Housing
Element
Law.
If
you
have
any
questions
or
need
additional
technical
assistance,
please
contact
Jose
Ayala,
of
our
staff,
at
Jose
.Aya
la@hcd
.ca.go
v.
Sincerely, Shannan
West
Land
Use
&
Planning
Unit
Chief
Enclosure
13 of
56 April 2, 2024, Item #8
APPENDIX
CITY
OF
POWAY
The
following
changes
are
necessary
to
bring
the
City's
housing
element
into
compliance
with
Article
10.6 of
the
Government
Code
. Accompanying
each
recommended
change,
we
cite
the
supporting
section
of
the
Government
Code.
Housing
element
technical
assistance
information
is
available
on
HCD's
website
at
http
://
www
.hcd.ca.gov/community-d
eve
lopmenUhous
ing-elemenUhousing
-element
memos
·.shtml.
Among
other
resources,
the
housing
element
section
contains
HCD's
latest
technical
assistance
tool,
Building
Blocks
for
Effective
Housing
Elements
(Building
Blocks},
available
at
http
://www.h
cd.ca
.gov/community
-devel
opmenUbuild
ing-b
locks
/index
.shtml
and
includes
the
Government
Code
addressing
State
Housing
Element
Law
and
other
resources.
A.
Review
and
Revision
Review
the
previous
element
to
evaluate
the
appropriateness,
effectiveness,
and
progress
in
implementation,
and
reflect
the
results
of
this
review
in
the
revised
element.
(Gov.
Code,
§
65588
(a)
and
(b).)
The
element
reviews
the
5 th
cycle
programs
but
does
not
provide
a
specific
review
for
programs
regarding
the
effectiveness
of
the
5 th
cycle
programs
for
meeting
the
community's
special
housing
needs
. An
analysis
must
be
provided
for
the
cumulative
impact
of
the
previous
housing
element's
programs
to
address
the
housing
needs
of
special
needs
populations.
The
element
should
specifically
look
at
programs
targeted
for
special
needs
populations
and
provide
a
narrative
analysis.
8. Housing
Needs,
Resources,
and
Constraints
1. Affirmatively
further[ing]
fair
housing
in
accordance
with
Chapter
15 (commencing
with
Section
8899
.50)
of
Division
1 of
Title
2 ... sha/1
include
an
assessment
of
fair
housing
in
the
jurisdiction
(Gov.
Code,
§
65583,
subd.
(c)(10)(A).)
Additional
analysis
is
required
to
meet
the
statutory
requirements.
In
particular,
the
element
must
analyze
the
enforcement
and
outreach
capacity
trends
and
patterns
at
the
regional
level.
Currently,
the
element
only
analyzes
this
data
at
the
local
level.
Additionally,
the
element
must
analyze
trends
and
patterns
of
race
at
the
regional
level.
Currently,
the
element
only
analyzes
the
trends
and
patterns
at
the
local
level.
Moreover,
the
element
must
analyze
the
economic
access
to
opportunity
at
the
regional
level;
currently,
the
element only
analyzes
the
data
at
the
local
level.
In
addition,
more
information
is
needed
to
fully
analyze
the
disproportionate
housing
needs
at
the
local
and
regional
level.
At
the
local
and
regional
level,
the
element
must
analyze
the
homeless
housing
need.
Additionally,
at
the
regional
level,
the
element
must
analyze
cost
burden
and
substandard
housing.
Next,
the
element
must
also
look
at
other
relevant
factors
that
contribute
to
fair
housing
issues
in
the
jurisdiction.
To
meet
this
requirement,
the
element
should
consider
information
beyond
data
that
identifies
and
compares
concentrations
of
groups
with
protected
characteristics.
HCD
Review
of
City
of
Poway's
6th
Cycle
Housing
Element
July
9,
2021
14 of
56 Page
1 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Additionally
, the
element
must
analyze
how
the
sites
inventory
affirmatively
furthers
fair
housing.
For
example,
the
element
should
analyze
whether
and/or
how
concentrating
the
lower-income
housing
need
in
the
portion
of
the
City
that
has
the
most
non-white
and
less
affluent
residents
furthers
the
goals
of
fair
housing
.
Lastly,
the
element
must
include
programs
that
(1)
enhance
housing
mobility
strategies
, (2)
encourage
development
of
new
affordable
housing
in
areas
of
opportunity,
(3)
improve
place-based
strategies
to
encourage
community
revitalization
, including
preservation
of
existing
affordable
housing,
and
(4)
protect
existing
residents
from
displacement.
Currently,
the
programs
listed
in
the
element
are
not
sufficient
to
take
any
meaningful
actions
in
combating
fair
housing
issues
in
Poway
. The
actions
must
directly
target
the
contributing
factors
to
fair
housing
issues
and
have
a
quantifiable outcome.
2. An
inventory
of
land
suitable
and
available
for
residential
development,
including
vacant
sites
and
sites
having
realistic
and
demonstrated
potential
for
redevelopment
during
the
planning
period
to
meet
the
locality's
housing
need
for
a
designated
income
level,
and
an
analysis
of
the
relationship
of
zoning
and
public
facilities
and
services
to
these
sites
. (Gov.
Code,
§
65583,
subd.
(a)(3).)
The
City
has
a
regional
housing
need
allocation
(RHNA)
of
1,319
housing
units,
of
which
736
are
for
lower-income
households.
To
address
this
need,
the
element
relies
on
vacant,
nonvacant,
and
sites
located
in
the
Poway
Road
Specific
Plan
(PRSP).
To
demonstrate
the
adequacy
of
these
sites
and
strategies
to
accommodate
the
City's
RHNA,
the
element
must
include
complete
analyses.
Progress
in
Meeting
the
RHNA:
The
element
indicates
(pages
4-6)
that
144
units
affordable
to
low-income
households
have
been
built
or
are
under
construction
or
approved
but
provides
no
information
documenting
how
affordability
of
the
units
was
determined
. As
you
know,
the
City's
RHNA
may
be
reduced
by
the
number
of
new
units
built
since
June
30,
2020;
however,
the
element
must
describe
the
City's
methodology
for
assigning
these
units
to
the
various
income groups
based
on
actual
sales
price
or
rent
level
of
the
units
and
demonstrate
their
availability
in
the
planning
period
. Currently
, the
element
states
that
over
the
last
few
years
projects
have
had
deed
restrictions
to
ensure
affordability.
While
this
information
is
useful,
the
element
must
describe
how
6 th
cycle
RHNA
credits
are
assumed
to
be
affordable.
Realistic
Capacity:
While
the
element
provides
some
information
regarding
realistic
capacity,
the
element
must
also
describe
the
methodology
used
to
assume
realistic
capacity
for
all
sites
. For
example,
Sites
23-30
assume
full
build-out
without
any
supporting
information
on
how
this
assumption
was
calculated
. While
these
sites
are
residentially
zoned
, the
element
must
describe
past
projects,
incentives,
and
other
factors
that
support
full
build-out
of
these
sites
. Furthermore,
the
analysis
on
Pages
4-19
concludes
that
past
projects
located
in
the
PRSP
have
averaged
27 dwelling
units
per
acre,
but
the
development
assumptions
for
sites
listed
in
the
PRSP
is
30 dwelling
units
per
acre.
In
addition,
most
of
the
sites
located
in
the
PRSP
are
not residentially
zoned
sites;
the
element
must
account
for
the
potential
for
non-residential development
in
these
non
-residential
zones
in
its
development
assumptions
.
HCD
Review
of
City
of
Poway's
6th
Cycle
Housing
Element
July
9,
2021
15 of
56 Page
2 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Zoning
for
Lower
Income
Households:
The
element
relies
upon
the
City's
inclus
ionary
housing
requirement
to
accommodate
the
regional
housing
need
for
lower-income
households
on
Site
23 and
Site 25.
However
, identifying
potential
results
of
an
inclusionary
zoning
ordinance,
by
itself
, is
not
sufficient
or
appropriate
to
demonstrate
the
adequacy
of
a
zone
to
accommodate
housing
affordable
to
lower-income
households;
therefore,
HCD
is
not
considering
the
unit
potential
for
lower-income
on
these
sites
when
assessing
the
adequacy
of
sites
to
accommodate
the
RHNA
for
lower
income.
Suitability
of
Nonvacant
Sites
: While
the
element
includes
some
recent
developments
(Pages
4-20)
_to
demonstrate
past
experience,
it does
not
explain
how
those
developments
relate
to
zoning
, existing
uses,
densities,
and
the
listed
sites
in
the
inventory.
To
analyze the
extent
that
existing
uses
may
impede
additional
residential
development,
the
element
should
also
include
information
on
whether
existing
uses
are
operating,
have
been
operating,
or
whether
they
are
or
not
anticipated
to
continue
operating.
The
element
can
also
analyze
the
age
of
the
structure,
structural
conditions
or
other
circumstances
and
trends,
lease
information,
market
conditions,
and
regulatory
or
other
incentives
or
standards
to
encourage
additional
residential
development
on
these
sites
to
demonstrate
redevelopment
potential.
Infrastructure
: While
the
element
describes
water
and
sewer
infrastructure,
it
must
also
demonstrate
sufficient
existing
or
planned
dry
utilities
supply capacity,
including
the
availab
ility
and
access
to
distribution
facilities
to
accommodate
the
City's
regional
housing
need
for
the
planning
period
(Gov
. Code
,§
65583
.2,
subd.
(b)-).
For
additional
information
, see
the
Building
Blocks
at
https
://
www
.hcd
.ca
.gov/commu
nity
deve
lopm
en
Ub
uil
dinq
-bloc
ks/site-
inv
ent
ory-ana
lysis/ana
lysis
-of
-sites
-and
zoninq
.shtml.
3. An
analysis
of
potential
and
actual
governmental
constraints
upon
the
maintenance,
improvement,
or
development
of
housing
for
all
income
levels,
including
the
types
of
housing
identified
in
paragraph
(1)
of
subdivision
(c),
and
for
persons
with
disabilities
as
identified
in
the
analysis
pursuant
to
paragraph
(7),
including
land
use
controls,
building
codes
and
their
enforcement,
site
improvements
, fees
and
other
exactions
required
of
developers,
and
local
processing
and
permit
procedures
. The
analysis
shall
also
demonstrate
local
efforts
to
remove
governmental
constraints
that
hinder
the
locality
from
meeting
its
share
of
the
regional
housing
need
in
accordance
with
Government
Code
section
65584
and
from
meeting
the
need
for
housing
for
persons
with
disabilities,
supportive
housing,
transitional
housing
, and
emergency
shelters
identified
pursuant
to
paragraph
(7).
Transitional
housing
and
supportive
housing
shall
be
considered
a
residential
use
of
property
and
shall
be
subject
only
to
those
restrictions
that
apply
to
other
residential
dwellings
of
the
same
type
in
the
same
zone
. (Gov.
Code,
§
65583
, subd
. (a)(5).)
Design
Review
: While
the
element
provides
a
general
overview
of
the
design
review
process
, the
element
must
analyze
the
effects
of
design
review
on
the
cost
and
length
of
the
approval
process,
and
whether
design
review
is
a
constraint
to
housing
development
in
the
City
.
HCD
Review
of
City
of
Poway's
6th
Cycle
Housing
Element
July
9,
2021
16 of
56 Page
3 April 2, 2024, Item #8
lnclusionary
Housing
: The
element
must
analyze
the
effects
of
the
inclusionary
housing
requirements
on
the
development
of
hous
ing
for
all
income
levels,
specifically
housing
supply,
and
affordability
. Namely,
the
element
should
provide
greater
detail
on
the
effects
of
the
inclusionary
housing
requ
irements
on
the
development
of
housing
, and
whether
the
inclusionary
housing
requirements
are
having
the
intended
impact.
Constraints
on
housing
for
Persons
with
Disabilities:
While
the
element
describes
its
definition
for
"family"
does
not
pose
a
constraint,
the
element
does
not
include
the
definition
of
family
in
the
element.
The
element
must
describe
the
zoning
code
definitions
of
family
and
analyze
the
impact
of
the
definition
on
housing
for
persons
with
disabilities.
4. Analyze
any
special
housing
needs
such
as
elderly;
persons
with
disabilities,
including
a
developmental
disability
; large
families;
farmworkers
; families
with
female
heads
of
households
; and
families
and
persons
in
need
of
emergency
shelter.
(Gov
.
Code,
§
65583,
subd
. (a)(7).)
The
element
provides
a
general
overview
of
the
special
housing
needs
of
farmworkers,
but
additional
analysis
is
needed
to
fully
meet
requirements
. For
example,
the
element
must
identify
and
analyze the
housing
needs
of
farmworkers
relative
to
the
region
. Farmworkers
may
choose
to
live
within
a
city
to
ensure
higher
access
to
services
but
travel
to
more
rural
areas
of
the
city
for
work.
Comparing
Poway's
farmworker
population
relative
to
the
region
would
help
fully
describe
the
farmworker
housing
need.
C.
Housing
Programs
1. Include
a
program
which
sets forth
a
schedule
of
actions
during
the
planning
period,
each
with
a
timeline
for
implementation,
which
may
recognize
that
certain
programs
are
ongoing,
such
that
there
will
be
beneficial
impacts
of
the
programs
within
the
planning
period,
that
the
local
government
is
undertaking
or
intends
to
undertake
to
implement
the
policies
and
achieve
the
goals
and
objectives
of
the
housing
element
through
the
administration
of
land
use
and
development
controls,
the
provision
of
regulatory
concessions
and
incentives,
and
the
utilization
of
appropriate
federal
and
state
financ
ing
and
subsidy
programs
when
available.
The
program
shall
include
an
identification
of
the
agencies
and
officials
responsible
for
the
implementation
of
the
various
actions
. (Gov
. Code
, §
65583,
subd.
(c).)
While
the
element
provides
outcomes
for
most
programs,
Program
16 must
be
revised
to
include
more
specific
commitments
during
the
planning
period
for
persons
with
special
housing
needs
. In
this
specific
case,
the
program
should
commit
to
actions
beyond
a
semi-annual
review
of
HCD's
Program
Directory
and
establish
more
concrete
actions
to
assist
in
the
development
in
housing
for
persons
with
special
housing
needs.
2. Identify
actions
that
will be
taken
to
make
sites
available
during
the
planning
period
HCD
Review
of
City
of
Poway's
6th
Cycle
Housing
Element
July
9,
2021
17 of
56 Page4
April 2, 2024, Item #8
with appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that portion of the city's or county's share of the regional housing need for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory completed pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) without rezoning, and to comply with the requirements of Government Code section 65584. 09. Sites shall be identified as needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multifamily rental housing, factory built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single-room occupancy units, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. (Gov. Code,§ 65583, subd. (c)(1).)
As noted in Finding B2, the element does not include a complete site analysis; therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types.
3. Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, including housing for all income levels and housing for persons with disabilities. The program shall remove constraints to, and provide reasonable accommodations for housing designed for, intended for occupancy by, or with supportive services for, persons with disabilities. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(3).) As noted in Finding B3, the element requires a complete analysis of potential governmental constraints. Depending upon the results of that analysis, the City may need to revise or add programs and address and remove or mitigate any identified constraints.
4. Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing throughout the community or communities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability, and other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Part 2.8 (commencing with Section 12900) of Division 3 of Title 2), Section 65008, and any other state and federal fair housing and planning law. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(5).)
As noted in Finding B1, the element does not fully meet the requirements for Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. The element must complete an analysis of impediments to fair housing and create targeted programs that will directly assist in mitigating these fair housing issues.
HCD Review of City of Poway's 6th Cycle Housing Element July 9, 2021
18 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
Bob Manis
Director of Development Services
City of Poway,
13325 Civic Center Drive,
Poway, CA 92064
Housing Element 2020-2029, January 2024
Dear Mr. Manis:
Nicholas Carruthers
1470 Silver Heights Road
Poway, CA 92064
January 17th 2024
First, let me thank you for the opportunity to provide input with respect to development and, perhaps more importantly, the construction of new housing within the City of Poway.
In the Housing Element update several sites in the city are identified for housing development with some emphasis on suitability for low/moderate income families and this is a laudable objective. We should recognize that many folks desire affordable housing within the city of their employment. Along these lines I am thinking of health care workers, grocery store employees, teachers and public safety personnel for whom a traditional single-family home (at least by Poway standards) may be out of reach. My criticism of the City's approach to this endeavor is that rather than distribute affordable housing evenly across the City the focus has become an asymmetric distribution, with one exception, of development in what one may consider South Poway. Much of this is a result of Proposition FF which applies questionable constraints to development in areas captured by Proposition FF and effectively forces higher density development south of Twin Peaks Road and clustered along Poway Road. The new construction along Poway Road has come nowhere near to the expectations of citizens surveyed in 2020 (see, Introduction, section H). From section H, the first four bullet points, lots of "encouragement" but realistically no meaningful delivery. My comments highlighted. • Encourage additional housing choices through the development of the PRSP which provides mixed use housing development, apartments, condominiums, and townhomes adjacent to essential services. Housing for seniors but remainder is market rate • Encourage reduced building heights and increased landscape and trees and private and common active and passive open space in housing projects with consideration to maximizing density. Four story buildings with minimal setbacks, Fairfield • Encourage connections (connectivity) between housing and essential services, parks, trails and related amenities promoting outdoor walking and biking opportunities. No expansion or addition of parks; cycling along PQway Road has become a dangerous sport
• Encourage traffic safety and reduced congestion with appropriate analysis as a part of new housing projects. Poway Road is now congested with the Poway/Community Road and Poway/Midland Road junctions hazardous to cyclists and pedestrians. 19 of 56 ATTACHMENT C
April 2, 2024, Item #8
With respect to Proposition FF, this may be viewed as an exclusionary zoning practice and I reference an article in the New York Times1 referring to this phenomenon as "the new redlining". Consequently, I strongly encourage you to develop affordable housing throughout the City. In this way more individuals supporting our community would have the ability to reside in the City and take advantage of the educational and social opportunities that Poway provides. Ultimately this may need for the elimination of Proposition FF to free large tracts of land for development and lead to a more equitable distribution of responsibilities.
I have only focused on one aspect of the Housing Element, although I appreciate the opportunity to make comments, and I encourage you to continue to engage citizens in order to guide future decisions.
Thank you, Nicholas Carruthers Ph.D
E-mail: [email protected]
Mobile: (858)-366-5037
1 Kahlenberg, New York Times; April 19th 2021
20 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
January
15,
2024
From:
Chris
Cruse
To:
Bob
Manis,
City
of
Poway
Re:
Poway
Revised
Housing
Element,
January
2024
.General
Comments
The
rezoning
of
Poway
Road
has
resulted
in
much
higher
densities,
and
a
wider
variety
of
housing
types,
but
it
has
not
resulted
in
a
substantial
increase
of
low
and
moderate
income
housing
in
Poway.
With
the
exception
of
one
project,
all
of
the
new
Poway
Rd
developments
are
market
rate,
with
condos
selling
for
close
to
a
million
dollars.
The
council
approved
the
PRSP
because
"Our
kids
could
not
afford
to
live
in
Poway
when
they
grew
up"
..
Unless
the
kids
are
making
over
$200,000
per
year,
they
cannot
afford
that
new
housing
on
Poway
RD.
Increasing
density did
not
make
the
new
housing
more
affordable.
No
new
homes
are
being
built
in
Poway
that
sell
for
less
than
$1
million.
Poway's
entire
RHNA
allotment
for
moderate
income
units
is
assigned
to
ADU
rentals
that
may
or
may not
actually
be
available
to
rent,
and
may
or
may
not
be
affordable
to
moderate
income
households.
The
lack
of
new affordable
housing
that
moderate
income
families
can
purchase
is
driving
up
the
prices
of
resale
homes
that
were
traditionally
sold
to
moderate
income
families
in
Poway
. Those
homes
are
now
selling
for
close
to,
and
over
a
million
dollars.
The
Poway
Rd
corridor
was
rezoned
specifically
to
accommodate
housing
at
densities
that
would
make
it possible
for
developers
to
build
low
and
moderate
income
housing
to
meet
the
RHNA
low
and
moderate
housing
requirements.
With
the
exception
of
one
project
for
seniors
on
city-owned
land,
developers
have
shunned
building
any
low
or
moderate
income
housing
for
more
profitable
and
expensive
housing
on
Poway
Road.
The
city
approved
The
Farm
Specific
Plan
in
2020.
This
rezoning
also
did
not
result
in
any
low,
very
low
or
moderate
income
units
being
built.
The
160
units
at
The
Farm
are
selling
for
$1
-$3
million. The
Harmon
Ranch
Specific
Plan,
another
development
that
involves
a
general
plan
amendment
and
a
rezone
of
RS-
7 parcels,
is
working
its
way
through
the
planning
process
right
now.
There
are
no
low,
very
low,
or
moderate
units
proposed
for
that
project.
The
city
council
will
soon
decide
on
whether
they will
give
the
developer
an
increase
in
density
to
build
on
the
flood
plain
in
south
Poway,
without
requiring
that
any
low
or
moderate
units
be
built.
21 of
56 April 2, 2024, Item #8
With one exception, the rezoning of land in Poway is not targeted at producing any low or moderate income housing. It is primarily being utilized by developers to build more expensive housing at a greater profit.
My concern is that the low, very low and moderate units required to fulfill the RHNA won't be built, as both the city and the state are incentivizing building larger, and more expensive housing. I have no concerns that the above-moderate income part of the RHNA will be built. In fact, I think it will be greatly exceeded.
Constraints: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing -Location The housing element mentions a considerable number of constraints that make it difficult to "affirmatively further fair housing" by building low or moderate income housing in north Poway. I find that the city is very inconsistent in applying the rationale for these constraints, and that the excuses the city gives for not building low or moderate income housing in north Poway, doesn't apply when those same circumstances exist in south Poway.
The Housing Element states that "The other two concentrated areas of non-white populations are the areas east of Pomerado Road and south and north of Poway Road and the areas north of Poway Road between Community Road and Midland Road and east of Midland Road. These areas consist of higher Asian, Hispanic and Other Race populations and housing types include a mix of apartments and single-family residences. Areas with higher white populations include mostly single-family residences on larger lots which will decrease with the inclusion of accessory dwelling units. " In another section of the housing element, the city claims that the RHNA units are not in areas of higher concentration of minorities, but in whiter areas:: "In addition to ADUs, Figures 2-22, 2-23, and 2-24 show that the Proposed RHNA sites shown in Figure 2-21 (basemap for Figures 2-22, 2-23, and 2-24) were carefully placed to help further fair housing by placing housing required for the RHNA in either an area that is more predominantly White or that is of lower income which continues to encourage inclusion within the City." In fact, the vast majority of RHNA designated locations are in the areas where there already is a higher concentration of minorities and people of lower incomes living in apartment houses.
But since Poway has not built any workforce or family affordable housing since 2007, and has no plans to build more, only a limited number of people living in this area would be eligible for 22 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
the
senior
housing
project
that
was
built
on
Poway
Rd
. The
future
project
on
Monte
Vista
is
designated
for
veterans
and
developmentally
disabled
adults,
which
is
a
limited
group
of
people
who
need
affordable
housing.
The
RHNA
units
are
not
located
in
the
"Whitest
areas
in
Poway"
.
Affirmatively
Furthering
Fair
Housing
-Geographical
Constraints
According
to
the
housing
element:
".
Figure
2-23
shows that
both
existing
and
proposed
affordable
units
are
well
dispersed
throughout
the
community
and
do
not
present
a
geographic
barrier
to
obtaining
affordable
housing.
As
shown,
the
majority
of
the
City
is
constrained
because
of
areas
within
the
Very
High
Fire
Hazard
area,
the
Habitat
Conservation
Plan
Mitigation
area,
the
Proposition
FF
(voter
approval
for
higher
density)
area,
and
areas
within
the
Open
Space
Resource
Management
(OS-RM)
zone.
While
some
of
these
constrained
areas
allow
for
low
density
single-family
residences,
much
of
the
area
is
preserved
open
space.
However,
because
of
the
prevalence
of
large
lot
single-family
residences,
these
constrained
areas
present
an
opportunity
to
construct
ADUs
and
JADUs.
Approximately
325
prospective
ADUs
are
anticipated
to
be
constructed
during
the
6th
housing
element
cycle
in
areas
anticipated
to
further
fair
housing.
With
ADUs
and
the
adoption
of
the
PRSP,
the
City
has
the
ability
to
meet
the
anticipated
future
affordable
housing
needs
of
the
community.
However,
it's
important
to
note
that
many
of
the
constrained
areas
have
limited
or
no
access
to
sewer
or
water
and
are
missing
essential
services
and
access
to
employment
centers,
transit,
commercial
retailers
with
grocers,
medical
services,
community
facilities
and
services
like
libraries
and
the
Mickey
Cafagna
Community
Center,
and
parks,
etc.
While
the
ADU's
will
help further
fair
housing
by
integrating
multi-family
uses
in
single-family
residential
areas,
most
prospective
ADU
sites
are
away
from
essential
services
and
areas
of
opportunity.
Conversely,
the
PRSP
area
is
surrounded
by
essential
services
and
is
considered
an
ideal
area
of
opportunity.
The
proposed
affordable
sites
within
the
PRSP
from
Table
4-5
coupled
with
ADUs
are
dispersed
throughout
the
community
to
further
fair
housing
for
all
persons
regardless
of
race,
religion,
sex,
marital
status,
ancestry,
national
origin,
color,
familial
status,
or
disability,
and
other
characteristics
protected
by
FEHA."
These
geographical
constraints
are
more
profound
in
north
Poway.
For
example,
the
only
north
Poway
parcel
that
is
on
the
RHNA
housing
list
is
a
parking
lot
in
the
hospital
next
to
Pomerado
Rd.
All
of
the
other
sites
are
in
south
Poway.
One
of
the
sites
in
south
Poway
is
the
Big
Stone
Lodge
site,
which
contains
a
creek,
floodway
and
floodplain
and
is
in
Poway's
habitat
area
and
it
is
also
in
the
high
fire
zone.
This
parcel
was
bought
by
Poway's
redevelopment
agency
and
the
city
declared
that
the
building
was
an
historic
building
and
the
land
itself
was designated
as
an
historic
passive
park.
Durng
the
redevelopment
wind-down,
the
city
asked
the
state
to
let
23 of
56 April 2, 2024, Item #8
them keep this parcel to use as an historic passive park, which they said was the highest and best possible use for it. When the state granted the request, the city took possession of the deed and sold it to their housing authority and transferred the sale money ($800,000) to a fund to build a new community center. Now, the city wants to tear down the Big Stone Lodge building (with housing funds) and build affordable housing on a parcel with the very same constraints that prevent affordable housing from being built in north Poway.
In fact, much of the residential area of Green Valley, in north Poway, is not in a habitat area or a high fire area. It is constrained by Prop FF, a voter initiative, that requires a vote of the public to increase density on rural residential zoned land.
S89 Lot Splits disallowed on rural residential lots in Poway In addition to no designated RHNA sites in Green Valley, the city is apparently refusing to allow S89 lot splits on north Poway parcels that are zoned rural residential, but not in a habitat area or high fire area.
https://poway.org/DocumentCenterNiew/8713/SB-9-Developments--Urban-Lot-Splits-General-ln formation-PDF?bidld=
This conflicts with the fact sheet from the state on where S89 lot splits can occur.
The fact sheet says that SB 9 lot splits can occur in any residential zone where the primary use is single family homes.
https://www.hcd.ca.gov/docs/planning-and-community-development/sb9factsheet.pdf 24 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
Single-Family Residential Zones Only
(Reference: Gov: Code,§§ 65852.21, subd. (a); 66411.7 subd. (a)(3)(A)) The parcel that will contain the proposed housing development or that will be subject to the lot split must be located in a single-family residential zone. Parcels located in multi family residential, commercial, agricultural, mixed-use zones, etc., are not subject to SB 9 mandates even if they allow single-family residential uses as a permitted use. While some zones are readily identifiable as single-family residential zones (e.g., R-1 "Single Family Residential"), others may not be so obvious. Some local agencies have multiple single-family zones with subtle distinctions between them relating to minimum lot sizes or allowable uses. In communities where there may be more than one single-family residential zone, the local agency should carefully review the zone district descriptions in the zoning code and the land use designation descriptions in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. This review will enable the local agency to identify zones whose primary purpose is single-family residential uses and which are therefore subject to SB 9.
Considerations such as minimum lot sizes, natural features such as hillsides, or the permissibility of keeping horses should not factor into the determination.
California Department of Housing and Community Development -SB 9 Fact Sheet Most of Green Valley residential areas are zoned for single-family residences, and nothing else.
Most of these lots are large, which is pretty much what defines them as being "rural". In fact, they are single family residences on large suburban lots.
Transportation Constraints
It is incredibly ironic that the new Farm development, which is in north Poway, is in an area that the housing element says is constrained by a lack of public transportation. The EIR for The Farm, which was approved by the Poway City Council in June, 2020, claimed a deduction in ADT (average daily car trips) because the project (or at least a tiny part of it) was within ½ mile of public transportation. In fact, the only bus that stops on Espola Rd, circulates around Poway 2x in the morning and 2x in the afternoon on school days only, picking up and dropping off students at the nearby high school.
The City Council not only accepted the EIR that claimed this deduction, but the Director of Development Services was ready to ministerially approve a specific plan change to The Farm with hundreds of additional deductions in ADT because of the nearness of the project to this bus stopp, which runs twice a day, on school days. Recently, the city hired the consultants who prepared the transportation portion of The Farm EIR as traffic consultants for the city.
So how does this awesome north Poway public transportation asset disappear when it comes to siting some affordable housing in north Poway?
25 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
Where
are
the
ADUs
that
are
being
rented
to
moderate
income
households?
Poway's
entire
RHNA
allotment
of
moderate
income
housing
is
to
be
met
with
AD
Us
These
ADUs
are
located
throughout
the
city
and
that
is
why
the
city
is
declaring
that
affordable
housing
is
available
in
all
areas
of
the
city.
I have
been
searching
online
for
several
months,
and
so
far,
I have
only
seen
one rental
ADU
in
north
Poway
in
my
online
searches.
I have
seen
many
listings
for
BNBs,
but
not
for
a
monthly
rental.
There
may
be
other
places
where
ADU
owners
are
advertising
their rentals
that
I am
not
aware
of.
Does
the
city
have
any
actual
data
on
how
many
of
these
AD
Us
are
being
used
as
room
additions
or
BNBs
by
the
owners?
What
data
does
the
city
have
to
show
how
many
of
these
units
are
being
rented
and
whether
the
rents
are
affordable?
How
many
units
are
actually
available
to
moderate
income
persons
or
families?
How
will
the city
know
if they
are
on
track
to
meet
the
RHNA
for
moderate
income
households
if the
only
information
on
the
AD
Us
is
the
number
of
permits?
Personally,
I don't
think
ALL
of
the
RHNA
units
for
moderate
income
families
in
Poway
during
the
6th
cycle
should
be
rental
units.
Moderate
income
families
should
also
be
able
to
buy
a
house. The
Messed
UP
Bonus
Density
Law
I agree
that
the
bonus
density
law
is
one
messed
up
law,
but
I have
slightly
different
reasons
for
saying
that
than
what
is
written
in
the
housing
element.
The
Bonus
Density
Law
gives
the
developer
a
density
bonus
AND
allows
them
to
ignore
setback
and
development
coverage
rules
and
other
codes.
This
allows
the
developer
to
build
very
large
and
very
expensive
houses
on
smaller
lots
than
allowed
under
Poway's
codes.
The
bonus
density
house,
which
the
developer
is
keeping,
is
required
to
be
the
same
size
as
the
other
houses,
It would
be
like
winning
the
lottery
for
a
very
low
income
person
to
get
to
live
in
a
brand
new
3000-4000
sq
ft.
house.
But
the
developer
is
keeping
it,
so
maybe
he
will
find
a
low
income
family
member
or
friend
to
live
there.
Once
again,
the
law
seems
to
enrich
the
developer
and
to
provide
very
few
housing
units
for
the
thousands
of
low
income
people
who
need
an
affordable
home.
In
a
nearby
city,
a
developer/investor
formed
a
non-profit
company
that
was
awarded
the
sole
bonus
density
house
from
a
project.
I am
sure
he
will
make
a
profit
off
of
it.
There
is
another
bonus
density
project
on
Poway's
RHNA
list.
This
project
is
in
Poway's
habitat
area
and
the
high
fire
zone.
The
area
is
zoned
for
low
density
and
is
supposed
to
be
a
buffer
area
between
the
rest
of
the
habitat
area
and
the
residential
area.
There
is
also
a
rare
vernal
pool
on
the
parcel
as
well
as
endangered
species.
The
bonus
density
law
allows
a
developer
to
destroy
the
habitat
and
build
more
houses
and
build
them
much
larger
houses
than
our
code
26 of
56 April 2, 2024, Item #8
allows in return for building one or two houses which may or may not be rented by a very low income household. The city should be fighting against this as it threatens to destroy valuable habitat areas for just one or two very large homes for a low income person or a friend of the developer.
lnclusionary Housing In Lieu Fee
Probably the biggest constraint to building affordable housing is that the city provides no incentives to get it built. The city gives away zoning increases for tiny things like landscaping a walkway or building a walkway between parcels. These incentives are not used to get developers to build affordable housing. Poway's paltry "in lieu" fee is a disincentive to build affordable housing. Poway has an inclusionary housing ordinance, but for a mere $500, developers can opt out, and all of them have opted out so far.
The housing element claims that hundreds of very low and low income units can be built on Poway Rd, on parcels where there are now retail establishments. But owners do not have to build low income housing. The current developments of Poway Commons and Fairfield chose not to build affordable housing. Why would the owners/developers of other parcels on Poway Rd build the affordable housing in the RHNA with no incentives to build it? Parks
According to the housing element: "Approximately 325 prospective ADUs are anticipated to be constructed during the 6th housing element cycle in areas anticipated to further fair housing.
With ADUs and the adoption of the PRSP, the City has the ability to meet the anticipated future affordable housing needs of the community. However, it's important to note that many of the constrained areas have limited or no access to sewer or water and are missing essential services and access to employment centers, transit, commercial retailers with grocers, medical services, community facilities and services like libraries and the Mickey Cafagna Community Center, and parks, etc.
Although thousands of housing units are being built in the Poway Rd area, the city has not added any new park space. North Poway has a lot more open space and also has the largest park, Poway Lake, in the entire city. The lack of new parks should be a constraint on building in south Poway, but it isn't. The city has no plans to build new parks, preferring instead to have private parties designate some quasi-public space in their development. But these quasi-public spaces often are just landscaping and not really parks that provide for active or passive recreational opportunities. They are just a way to get the developer to put in some landscaping, and have homeowners pay for it via HOAs. History shows that there is no certainty that these privately owned and maintained areas will not be developed into something else later, even 27 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
when they are deed restricted. There have been no new city parks built in the last 16 years.
And there are no areas set aside for future parks in the higher density RHNA area.
Transportation and access to Jobs
It is true that there are more retail outlets in RHNA area. And a library. But there are also retail venues close to Green Valley in north Poway. Those retail venues are in Rancho Bernardo, but they are nearby.
A person needs a car to live in any area of Poway. Transportation issues are the same in north Poway and south Poway. The roads are crowded. The designated RHNA area in south Poway are also heavily impacted by a lack of sufficient parking spaces. Since the condos were built on Poway Rd, there has been a big increase in the number of cars parking in nearby neighborhoods. The area around Poway Rd/ Carriage Rd /Oak Knoll Rd is particularly stressed by insufficient parking space.
Car ownership is essential in Poway, as there is very limited bus service. Buses arrive at around 30 min intervals on Poway Rd. and the number of stops makes getting to the transfer center a very inefficient use of time. Some years ago MTS also discontinued bus service in the Garden Rd area. Additionally, there is no bus service from the "opportunity area" to the nearby industrial park. Bus service was discontinued to the industrial park years ago. I have heard that the buses cannot run there because of a lack of sidewalks and ADA laws.
For some strange reason, many of the new developments in Poway also lack sidewalks. This is a very new feature and it is inconsistent with our general plan guidelines for urban roads. The lack of sidewalks disincentivizes walking, and it is a hardship for people in wheelchairs, or with baby strollers. In the new housing projects, people have to walk in the street when leaving on foot.
As for the lack of funding, Poway has failed to make a Climate Action Plan or a Complete Streets Plan. Poway is ineligible for some transportation grants through Sandag because of their refusal to make a CAP and a Complete Streets Plan.
Re: Families headed by single moms.
From the housing element: "While most of the City of Poway is not considered LMI, the highest concentration of LMI population is located in tracts south of the City along Poway Road.Female-headed households with children require special consideration and assistance because of their greater need for affordable housing and accessible day care, health care, and 28 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
other supportive services. In Poway, female headed households.are concentrated in a tract in the eastern area of the City, near Dos Hermanos Road (Figure 2-9). This tract has between 20 to 40 percent of children living in female-headed households, compared to less than 20 percent in other tracts in the City."
It may be true that this tract has the highest percent single mom households, but there are very few households in that tract. There is no city and water sewer service there and can't be more than a handful of households. Even though the percent of total households in another tract might be lower, there could easily by dozens, if not hundreds, of households in that tract headed by a single mom.Instead of looking at a very remote rural tract that has a couple of single mom households, why not find out where they really are and how the city can provide "special consideration and assistance because of their greater need for affordable housing, and accessible day care, and other supportive services"?
29 of 56
April 2, 2024, Item #8
STATE
Of
CAI
IFORNIA
-BUSINESS
CONSUMER
SERVICES
AND
HOUSING
AGENCY
DEPARTMENT
OF
HOUSING
AND
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION
OF
HOUSING
POLICY
DEVELOPMENT
2020
W.
El
Camino
Avenue,
Suite
500
Sacramento,
CA
95833
(916)
263-2911
/ FAX
(916)
263-7453
www.hcd
.ca
.qov
March
13,
2024
Bob
Manis,
Director
Development
Services
Department
City
of
Poway
13325
Civic
Center
Drive
Poway,
CA
92064
_ Dear
Bob
Manis:
RE:
City
of
Poway's
6 th
Cycle
(2021-2029)
Revised
Draft
Housing
Element
Thank
you
for
submitting
the
City
of
Poway's
(City)
revised
draft
housing
element
update
received
for
review
on
January
22,
2024,
along
with
technical
modifications
received
on
March
12,
2024.
Pursuant
to
Government
Code
section
65585,
the
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development
(HCD)
is
reporting
the
results
of
its
review.
In
addition,
HCD
considered
public
comments
from
Chris
Cruse
and
Preserve
Wild
Poway
pursuant
to
Government
Code
section
65585,
subdivision
(c).
The
revised
draft
element,
including
technical
modifications,
meets
the
statutory
requirements
of
State
Housing
Element
Law.
The
housing
element
will
substantially
comply
with
State
Housing
Element
Law
(Gov.
Code,
§
65580
et
seq)
when
it
is
adopted,
submitted
to,
and
approved
by
HCD,
in
accordance
with
Government
Code
section
65585
.
As
a
reminder,
the
City's
6th
cycle
housing
element
was
due
April
15,
2021.
As
of
today,
the
City
has
not
completed
the
housing
element
process
for
the
6th
cycle.
The
City's
5th
cycle
housing
element
no
longer
satisfies
statutory
requirements.
HCD
encourages
the
City
to
revise
the
element
as
described
above,
adopt,
and
submit
to
HCD
to
regain
housing
element
compliance.
Public
participation
in
the
development,
adoption
and
implementation
of
the
housing
element
is
essential
to
effective
housing
planning.
Throughout
the
housing
element
process,
the
City
must
continue
to
engage
the
community,
including
organizations
that
represent
lower-income
and
special
needs
households,
by
making
information
regularly
available
while
considering
and
incorporating
comments
where
appropriate.
Please
be
aware,
any
revisions
to
the
element
must
be
posted
on
the
local
government's
website
and
to
email
a
link
to
all
individuals
and
organizations
that
have
previously
requested
notices
relating
to
the
local
government's
housing
element
at
least
seven
days
before
submitting
to
HCD
.
30 of
56 ATTACHMENT
D
April 2, 2024, Item #8
Bob
Manis,
Director
Page
2 Several
federal,
state,
and
regional
funding
programs
consider
housing
element
compliance
as
an
eligibility
or
ranking
criteria.
For
example,
the
CalTrans
Senate
Bill
(SB)
1 Sustainable
Communities
grant,
the
Affordable
Housing
and
Sustainable
Communities
programs,
and
HCD's
Permanent
Local
Housing
Allocation
consider
housing
element
compliance
and/or
annual
reporting
requirements
pursuant
to
Government
Code
section
65400.
With
a
compliant
housing
element,
the
City
will
meet
housing
element
requirements
for
these
and
other
funding
sources.
For
your
information,
some
general
plan
element
updates
are
triggered
by
housing
element
adoption
. HCD
reminds
the
City
to
consider
timing
provisions
and
welcomes
the
opportunity
to
provide
assistance
. For
information, please
see
the
Technical
Advisories
issued
by
the
Governor's
Office
of
Planning
and
Research
at:
https://www.opr.ca.gov/planning/general-plan/guidelines.html. HCD appreciates
the
hard
work
and
dedication
the
City's
housing
element
team
provided
in
preparation
of
the
City's
housing
element
and
looks
forward
to
receiving
the
City's
adopted
housing
element.
If
you
have
any
questions
or
need
additional
technical
assistance,
please
contact
Jose
Ayala,
of
our
staff,
at
[email protected].
Sincerely, Paul
McDougall
Senior
Program
Manager
31 of
56 April 2, 2024, Item #8
32 of 56
City of Poway 2020-2029 Housing Element (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) https://poway.org/286/Genera I-Plan
ATTACHMENT E
April 2, 2024, Item #8
RESOLUTION NO. 21-067
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT) FOR
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 21-001 AND 21-002 FOR THE
ADOPTION OF CITY OF POWAY HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
(2020-2029)
WHEREAS, State Law requires that cities periodically update the Housing Element of the General Plan;
WHEREAS, an Environmental Initial Study (EIS) was completed for the project, as required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A letter was sent to the tribal representatives which are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area within the City of Poway's jurisdiction. The EIS determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A Notice of the Availability of the EIS and proposed Negative Declaration (ND) for public review and comment was provided pursuantto the requirements of CEQA;
WHEREAS, the EIS and draft ND were sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution and review by relevant state agencies (State Clearinghouse# 2021060520) for a required 30- day public review and comment period;
WHEREAS, Notice of Availability of the EIS and ND for public review and comment was provided pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. No comments were received during the 30- day public review and comment period;
WHEREAS, on August 3, 2021, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing to receive testimony from the public, both for and against, relative to this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered the agenda report for the proposed project, including the attachments, and has considered all other evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows:
SECTION 1: In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Environmental Initial Study (EIS) and a Negative Declaration (ND) have been prepared for General Plan Amendment (GPA) 21-001, GPA21-002 and Environmental Assessment (EA) 21-001 for the Housing Element Update. It was determined that the project will not have any significant adverse impacts on the environment. Any anticipated impacts were determined to be below a level of significance and, therefore, do not require any mitigation. The EIS and draft Negative Declaration were sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution and review by relevant state agencies (State Clearinghouse #2021060520) for a required 30-day public review and comment period. The City Council has considered the EIS and ND, and public comments received on the EIS and ND. The subject EIS and ND docu'mentation are fully incorporated herein by this reference. The City Council finds, on the basis of the whole record before it, that there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant impact on the environment. The City Council hereby adopts the ND (Exhibit A). 33 of 56 ATTACHMENT F
April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution No. 21-067
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 3rd day of August, 2021 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
ATTEST:
34 of 56
MULLIN, FRANK, GROSCH, LEONARD, VAUS
NONE
NONE
NONE
~ ---2
Steve Vaus, Mayor
April 2, 2024, Item #8
STEVE VAUS, Mayor
BARRY LEONARD, Deputy Mayor
DA VE GROSCH, Councilmcmbcr
CA YLIN FRANK, Councilmcmbcr
JOI-IN MULLIN, Councilmcmbcr
CITY OF POWAY
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF POWAY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Resolution No. 21-067
Pa e 3
1. Name and Address of Applicant: City of Poway, Development Services, 13325 Civic Center Drive, Poway, CA 92064.
2. Project Name and Brief Description of Project: Environmental Assessment (EA) 21-001: General Plan Amendment (GPA) 21-001 adopting the City of Poway 2020-2029 Housing Element of the General Plan and amending the text of the Community Development (Land Use) Element of the General Plan to reflect the updated Housing Element.
3. In accordance with Resolution 83-084 of the City of Poway, implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the City of Poway City Council has found that the above project will not have a significant effect upon the environment and has approved a Negative Declaration. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
4. This Negative Declaration is comprised of this form along with the Environmental Initial Study that includes the Initial Study.
5. The decision of the City Council of the City of Poway is final.
Contact Person: Scott Nespor Phone: (858) 668-4656
Attachments:
1. Environmental Initial Study
35 of 56
City Hall Located at 13325 Civic Center Drive
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 789, Poway, California 92074-0789 www.poway.org
April 2, 2024, Item #8
ATTACHMENT
1 CITY
OF
POWAY
ENVIRONMENT
AL
INITIAL
STUDY
AND
CHECKLIST
Resolution
No.
21-067 Page4
A.
INTRODU,CTION This
Environmental
Initial
Study
and
Checklist,
along
with
information
contained
in
the
public
record,
comprise
the
environmental
documentation
for
the
proposed
project
as
described
below
pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act
(CEQA).
Based
upon
the
information
contained
herein
and
in
the
public
record,
the
City
of
Poway
has
prepared
Negative
Declaration
for
the
proposed
project.
B.
PROJECT
INFORMATION
1. Project
Title:
2020-2029
City
of
Poway
Housing
Element
of
the
General
Plan:
Environmental
Assessment (EA)
21-001:
General
Plan
Amendment
(GPA)
21-001
2. Lead
Agency
Name
and
Address:
___
~C~ity-'-"'o~f~P~ow~aY
..... ,~D~e~v~e~lo=p~m~e~n~t~S~e~rv~ic_e-s
__
13325
Civic
Center
Drive,
Poway,
CA
92064
3. Contact
Person
and
Phone
Number
:
Scott
Nespor,
Associate
Planner,
858-668-4656
4. Project
Location:
Citywide
(Exhibit
A -
Attached)
5. Project
Sponsor's
Name
and
Address
: -------=C=it~y-=o-'-f
.,_P=ow=ay..__
_______
_
13325
Civic
Center
Drive.
Poway,
CA
92064
6. General
Plan
Designation:
Citywide
-Not
Applicable
for
adoption
of
a
Housing
Element
Update
7. Zoning
:
Citywide
-Not
Applicable
for
adoption
of
Housing
Element
Update
8. Description
of
Project:
36 of
56 This
project
is
a
General
Plan
Amendment
to
update
and
adopt
the
City
of
Poway
2020-2029
Housing
Element
for
the
Sixth
Cycle
planning
period
from
June
30,
2020
to
April
15,
2029
and
amend
the
text
of
the
Community
Development
(Land
Use)
Element
of
the
General
Plan
to
reflect
the
updated
Housing
Element.
The
Housing
Element
update,
which
is
one
of
the
seven
City's
General
Plan
elements,
is
a
policy
document
designed
to
provide
the
City
with
a
coordinated
and
comprehensive
strategy
for
promoting
the
production
of
safe,
decent,
and
affordable
housing
within
the
community.
California
Government
Code
Section
65580
states
the
following
regarding
the
importance
of
creating housing
elements:
a.
The
availability
of
housing
is
of
vital
statewide
importance,
and
the
early
attainment
of
decent
housing
and
a
suitable
living
environment
for
every
Californian,
including
farmworkers,
is
a
priority
of
the
highest order
.
1 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
6 EIS
and
Checklist
37 of
56 •
Matching
housing
supply
with
need;
•
Maximizing
housing
choices
throughout
the
community
•
Assisting
in
the
provision
of
affordable
housing
•
Removing
governmental
and
other
constraints
to
housing
investment;
and
•
Promoting
fair
and
equal
housing
opportunities.
The
City's
Housing
Element
update
contains
the
following
components
:
• A
profile
and
analysis
of
the
City's
demographics,
housing
characteristics,
existing
and
future
housing
needs,
and
fair
and
equal
housing
opportunities
and
constraints
(Chapter
2,
Community
Profile)
.
• A
review
of
the
constraints
to
housing
production
and
preservation.
Constraints
include
potential
market,
governmental,
policy,
and
environmental
limitations
to
meeting
the
City's
identified
housing
needs
(Chapter
3,
Constraints)
.
•
An
assessment
of
resources
available
to
meet
the
City's
objectives
regarding
housing
production
and
preservation
and
its
ability
to
further
fair
housing.
Resources
include
land
available
for
new
construction
and
redevelopment,
an
analysis
of
site
constraints
and
the
site's
ability
to
further
fair
housing,
as
well
as
financial
and
administrative
resources
available
(Chapter
4,
Housing
Resources).
• A statement
of
the
housing
plan
to
address
the
City's
identified
housing
needs,
including
housing
goals,
policies,
and
programs
(Chapter
6,
Housing
Plan)
.
Regional
Housing
Needs
Allocation
(RHNA)
The
Regional
Housing
Needs
Allocation
(RHNA)
is
mandated
by
State
law
as
part
of
the
periodic
process
of
updating
the
local
housing
element
of
the
General
Plan.
The
RHNA
process
begins
with
the
regional determination
figure
(the
total
number
of
housing
units
needed
to
meet
housing
needs
in
the
SANDAG
region)
issued
by
HCD,
followed
by
an
allocation
to
each
jurisdiction
within
the
region
(specific
number
of
units
allocated
to
each
jurisdiction).
For
the
2020
to
2029
Housing
Element,
the
regional
determination
was
based
solely
on
projected
housing
need
during
an
over
eight-year
planning
period
.
Recent
changes
to
State
law
added
a
requirement
that
existing
housing
needs
must
be
incorporated
in
the
regional
determination
by
housing
need
indicators
such
as
vacancy
rates,
job/housing
balance,
cost
burden,
and
overcrowding.
SANDAG
is
mandated to
allocate
the
regional
housing
need
set
by
HCD
to
jurisdictions
in
the
region.
In
allocating
the
region's
future
housing
needs
to
jurisdictions,
SANDAG
is
required
to
take
the
following
factors
into
consideration
pursuant
to
Section
65584
of
the
State
Government
Code:
•
Market
demand
for
housing;
•
Employment opportunities;
•
Availability
of
suitable
sites
and
public
facilities;
•
Commuting
patterns;
•
Types
of
tenure
housing;
•
Loss
of
units
in
assisted
housing
developments;
•
Over-concentration
of
lower
income
households;
and
3 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No.
21-067 Page
8 EIS
and
Checklist
38 of
56 Continue
to
maintain
the
Mobile
Home
Park
Zone
Continue
to
enforce
Construction
Codes
Continue
to
maintain
Neighborhoods
Revitalization
Continue
to
maintain
and
enhance
Resident
Services
Continue
to
fund
Nonprofit
Housing
Development
Corporations,
as
funding
becomes
available Continue
to
monitor
Affordable
Housing
Projects
Develop
and
implement
a
Comprehensive
Maintenance
Agreement
for
Affordable
Housing
Developments
Development
of
New
Housing
Develop
new
Rental
Housing
Continue
to
develop
new
Affordable
Housing
on
Parcels
with
the
Affordable
Housing
Overlay
Zone
(AHOZ)
Designation
Implement
Mixed-Use
Development
Standards
Continue
to
collect
In-Lieu
fees
and
monitor
the
City's
lnclusionary
Housing
Ordinance
Continue
allowing
Poway
Housing
Authority
to
retain,
promote,
and
provide
affordable
housing
and
maintain
reporting
Implement
Zoning
Amendments
for
Special
Needs
Housing
(e.g.,
Low
Barrier
Navigation
Centers,
Transitional
and
Supportive
Housing,
Emergency
Shelters,
Residential
Care
Facilities,
Agricultural
Worker
Housing,
Employee
Housing,
Housing
with
Reasonable
Accommodations,
Single-Room
Occupancy)
Continue
to
provide
for
Special
Needs
Housing
including
determining
the
availability
of
funding
for
implementation
of
housing
programs
Continue
the
First
Time
Homebuyer
Assistance
Program
to
assist
Program
participants
with
loan
servicing
and
resale
processing,
as
funding
is
available
Continue
offering
single-family
rehabilitation
loans
with
the
Home
Enhancement
Loan
Program,
as
funding
is
available
Maintain
Zoning
Categories
in
the
General
Plan
to
encourage
diversity
of
development
to
serve
as
many
types
of
residents
as
possible
while
minimizing
land-use
related
conflicts Evaluate
Community
Land
Trusts
to
determine
options
for
use
of
the
community
land
trust
model
Continue
to
provide
priority
for
the
provision
of
services
to
Lower
Income
Households
Continue
to
enforce
City
codes,
General
Plan
Polices
, and
Zoning
Regulations
Continue
to
monitor
Ordinances,
User
Charges,
and
Fees
Update
the
Poway
Municipal
Code
to
comply with
current
Density
Bonus
law
Conduct
public
outreach
and
education
programs
that
engage
the
community
to
help
create
an
understanding
of
and
support
for
affordable
housing,
as
funding
is
available
Promote
Transit-Oriented
projects
Encourage
the
provision
of
housing
for
Extremely-Low
Income
Households,
as
funding
is
available
Monitor
and
evaluate
No
Net
Loss
requirement
per
state
law
Monitor
and
preserve
potential
At-Risk
housing
units
to
ensure
adequate
sites
are
available
throughout
planning
period,
as
funding
is
available
Monitor
and
evaluate
the
AHOZ
Ordinance
Development
Standards
Update
the
Public
Safety
Element
and
ensure
consistency
with
the
Adopted
Housing
Element Implement
SB35
permit
streamlining
and
adopt
procedures
for
processing
of
new
affordable
housing
projects
5 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No.
21-067 Page
10 EIS
and
Checklist
39 of
56 Since
the
5th
cycle
Housing
Element
was
adopted
in
2013,
the
State
Legislature
has
adopted
several
bills
which
strengthen
requirements
related
to
the
Residential
Sites
Inventory.
Among
these,
the
most
significant
are
AB
1397
(2017)
and
SB
166
(2017),
which
imposed
several
key
new
requirements.
These
new
requirements
are
summarized
as
follows:
Enhanced
Requirements:
Realistic
Development
Potential
(AB
1397)
Assembly
Bill
1397
requires
that,
for
each
site
included
in
the
Residential
Sites
Inventory,
the
City
identify
the
realistic
development
potential
for
the
site
within
the
eight-year
planning
period.
For
non-
vacant
sites,
the
methodology
used
to
identify
realistic
development
potential
must
consider
factors
such
as
existing
uses,
past
development
trends,
market
conditions,
and
the
availability
of
regulatory
and/or
other
development
incentives.
No
Net
Loss
(SB
166)
Senate
Bill
166
amended
the
existing
No
Net
Loss
Law
to
require
sufficient
adequate
sites
to
be
available
at
all
times
throughout
the
housing
element
planning
period
to
meet
a jurisdiction's
remaining
unmet
RHNA
goals
for
each
income
category
; To
comply
with
the
No
Net
Loss
Law,
as
jurisdictions
make
decisions
regarding
zoning
and
land
use,
or
development
occurs,
jurisdictions
must
assess
their
ability
to
accommodate
new
housing
in
each
income
category
on
the
remaining
sites
in
their
housing
element
site
inventories.
A
jurisdiction
must add
additional
sites
to
its
inventory
if
land
use
decisions
or
development results
in
a shortfall
of
sufficient
sites
to
accommodate
its
remaining
housing
need
for
each
income
category
.
In
particular,
a
jurisdiction
may
be
required
to
identify
additional
sites
according
to
the
No
Net
Loss
Law
if
a
jurisdiction
rezones
a
site
or
if the
jurisdiction
approves a
project
at
a
different
income
level
or
lower
density
than shown
in
the
Residential
Sites
Inventory.
Lower
density
means
fewer
units
than
the
capacity
assumed
in
the
site
inventory
.
To
ensure
that
sufficient
capacity
exists
in
the
housing
element
to
accommodate
the
RHNA
throughout
the
planning
period,
HCD
recommends
that
jurisdiction
create
a
buffer
in
the
housing
element
inventory
of
more
capacity
than
required,
especially
for
capacity
to
accommodate
the
lower
income
RHNA
.
Jurisdictions
can
also
create
a
buffer
by
projecting
site
capacity
at
less
than
the
maximum
density
to
allow
for
some
reductions
in
density
at
a
project
level.
The
2020-
2029
Housing
Element
identifies
a
140
unit
buffer
above
the
RHNA
with
credits
from
Table
4-4
and
sites
from
Table
4-5
(1,459
total
housing
units
provided
to
meet
RHNA,
excluding
additional
sites
identified
in
Table
A-1).
Rezoning
for
Re-Use
of
Sites
to
Accommodate
Lower
Income
RHNA
(20
percent
inclusionary,
By-right) Sites
identified
to
accommodate
the
lower-income
RHNA
are
subject
to
additional
requirements
if they
were
identified
in
a
previous
planning
period.
Generally,
these
requirements
would
apply
to
the
use
of
a
non-vacant
site
that
was
identified
in
the
prior
planning
period's
housing
element
(i.e.,
5th
cycle
Housing
Element),
or
to
the
use
of
a vacant
site
that
was
identified
in
two
or
more
consecutive
planning
periods
(i.e.,
5th
and
4th
cycle
Housing
Elements).
When
sites
meeting
these
conditions
are
used
to
accommodate
the
lower-income
RHNA,
the
jurisdiction's
housing
element
must
include
a
program
to
be
completed
within
three
years
of
the
beginning
of
the
planning
period
to
allow
residential
use
by-right
at
specified
densities
for
housing
developments
in
which
at
least
20 percent
of
the
units
are
affordable
to
lower
income
households
.
7 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
12 EIS
and
Checklist known
as
"The
City
in
the
Country"
and
prides
itself
on
the
fact
that
over
half
of
the
39.4 square
mile
area
is
preserved
as
dedicated
open
space.
The
community
offers
a
diverse
range
of
housing
options.
an
outstand
ing
school district.
a thriving
business
park.
a broad
range
of
dining
and
shopping
opportun
ities.
beautiful
parks
. and
trails.
Most
of
the
City
's
residentially
zoned
land
has
already
been
developed
with
a
diversity
of
housing
types,
including
single-family
homes,
mobile
home
parks,
townhomes,
condominiums.
and
apartments
.
New
mixed
-use
housing
opportunities
were
developed
with
the
adoption
of
the
Poway
Road
Specific
Plan
in
2017.
10. Other
Public
Agencies
Whose
Approval
is
Required
:
The
California
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development
(HCD)
reviews
and
determines
whether
the
Housing
Element
update
complies
with
the
State
of
California
law
and
certifies
the
Housing
Element
as
applicable.
No
other
approvals
by
outside
public
agencies
are
required.
11 . Have
California
Native
American
tribes
traditionally
and
culturally
affiliated
with
the
project
area
requested
consultation
pursuant
to
Public
Resources
Code
section
21080
.3.1
If
so
, is
there
a
plan
for
consultation
that
includes,
for
example,
the
determination
of
significance
of
impacts
to
tribal
cultural
resources
, procedures
regarding
confidentiality
, etc
.
In
accordance
with
Government
Codes
Sections
65352.3
and
65342
.4
and
Public
Resources
Code
Section
21080
.3.1,
the
City
of
Poway,
as
Lead
Agency,
sent
a
letter
to
the
Tribal
Representatives
notifying
the
tribes
identified
by
the
Native
American
Heritage
Commission
(NAHC)
of
the
proposed
project
in
accordance
with
AB
52 and
SB
18. The
City
received
responses
from
the
Rincon
Band
of
Luiseno
Indians
tribe,
which
noted
they
are
not
trad
itionally
and
culturally
affiliated
within
the
geographic
area
within
the
City
of
Poway's
jurisdiction
.
Responses
to
the
AB
52 and
SB
18 consultation
notices
were
received
and
consultation
concluded
as
discussed
in
this
document.
SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION:
City
of
Poway
General
Plan
and
EIR
for
the
General
Plan
Poway
Road
Specific
Plan
and
EIR
for
the
Poway
Road
Specific
Plan
City
of
Poway
Municipal
Code
City
of
Poway
2020-2029
Housing
Element
City
of
Poway
Subarea
Habitat
Conservation
Plan
(HCP)
NOTE
: Conducting
consultation
early
in
the
CEQA
process
allows
tribal
governments
, lead
agencies,
and
project
proponents
to
discuss
the
level
of
environmental
review
, identify
and
address
potential
adverse
impacts
to
tribal
cultural
resources
, and
reduce
the
potential
for
delay
and
conflict
in
the
environmental
review
process
. (See
Public
Resources
Code
section
21080
.3.2.) Information
may
also
be
available
from
the
California
Native
American
Heritage
Commission
's Sacred
Lands
File
per
Public
Resources
Code
section
5097
.96
and
the
California
Historical Resources
Information
System
administered
by
the
California
Office
of
Historic
Preservation
. Please
also
note
that
Public
Resources
Code
section
21082.3(c)
contains
provisions
specific
to
confident
iality
.
9 40
of
56 April 2, 2024, Item #8
EIS
and
Checklist
C.
EIS
and
Checklist
I. a. b. C. d. II.
ISSUE
AESTHETICS. Except
as
provided
in
Public
Code
Section
21099,
would
the
project:
Have
a substantial
adverse
effect
on
a scenic
vista?
Substantially
damage
scenic
resources,
including,
but
not
limited
to,
trees,
rock
outcroppings,
and
historic
buildings
within
a
State
scenic
hiqhwav?
In
non-urbanized
areas,
substantially
degrade
the
existing
visual
character
or
quality
of
public
views
of
the
site
and
its
surroundings?
(Public
views
are
those
that
are
experienced
from
publicly
accessible
vantage
point).
If
the
project
is
in
an
urbanized
area,
would
the
project
conflict
with
applicable
zoning
and
other
reaulations
governing
scenic
quality?
Create
a
new
source
of
substantial
light
or
glare
which
would
adversely
affect
day
or
nighttime
views
in
the
area? AGRICULTURAL
AND
FORESTRY
RESOURCES. In
determining
whether
impacts
to
agricultural
resources
are
significant
environmental
effects,
lead
agencies
may
refer
to
the
California
Agricultural
Land
Evaluation
and
Site
Assessment
Model
(1997)
prepared
by
the
California
Department
of
Conservation
as
an
optional
model
to
use
in
assessing
impacts
on
agriculture
and
farmland.
In
determining
whether
impacts
to
forest
resources,
including
timberland,
are
significant
environmental
effects,
lead
agencies
may
refer
to
information
compiled
by
the
California
Department
of
Forestry
and
Fire
Protection
regarding
the
41 of
56 I
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT 11
-I
POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT
UNLESS
MITIGATION
INCORPORATED
Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
14 LESS
THAN
SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
:
NO
IMPACT
'.
X X X X
'
April 2, 2024, Item #8
EIS
and
Checklist
ISSUE
a.
Conflict
with
or
obstruct
implementation
of
the
applicable
air
quality
plan?
b.
Result
in
a
cumulatively
considerable
net
increase
of
any
criteria
pollutant
for
which
the
project
region
is
non-
attainment
under
an
applicable
federal
or
state
ambient
air
quality
standard?
C.
Expose
sensitive
receptors
to
substantial
pollutant
concentrations?
d.
Result
in
other
emissions
(such
as
those
leading
to
odors
adversely
affecting
a
substantial
number
of
• •
I?
IV.
BIOLOGICAL
RESOURCES.
Would
the
project:
a.
Have
a
substantial
adverse
effect,
either
directly
or
through
habitat
modifications,
on
any
species
identified
as
a
candidate,
sensitive,
or
special
status
species
in
local
or
regional
plans,
policies,
or
regulations,
or
by
the
California
Department
of
Fish
and
Game
or
U.S.
Fish
and
Wildlife
Service?
b.
Have
a
substantial
adverse
effect
on
any
riparian
habitat
or
other
sensitive
natural
community
identified
in
local
or
regional
plans,
policies,
regulations,
or
by
the
California
Department
of
Fish
and
Game
or
U.S.
Fish
and
Wildlife
Service?
C.
Have
a
substantial
adverse
effect
on
state
or
federally
protected
wetlands
(including,
but
not
limited
to,
marsh,
vernal
pool,
coastal,
etc.)
through
direct
removal,
filing,
hydrological
interruption,
or
other
means?
d.
Interfere
substantially
with
the
movement
of
any
native
resident
or
migratory
fish
or
wildlife
species
or
with
established
native
resident
migratory
wildlife
corridors,
or
42 of
56 POTENTIALLY
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
SIGNIFICANT
UNLESS
IMPACT
MITIGATION
INCORPORATED
13 Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
16 LESS
THAN
NO
SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
IMPACT
X X X X X X X X
April 2, 2024, Item #8
EIS
and
Checklist
ISSUE
recent
Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake
Fault
Zoning
Map
issued
by
the
State
Geologist
for
the
area
or
based
on
other
substantial
evidence
of
a
known
fault?
Refer
to
Division
of
Mines
and
Geology
Special
Publication
42. ii)
Strong
seismic
ground
shaking?
iii)
Seismic-related
ground
failure,
including
liquefaction?
iv)
Landslides?
b.
Result
in
substantial
soil
erosion
or
the
loss
of
topsoil?
C.
Be
located
on
a geologic
unit
or
soil
that
is
unstable,
or
that
would
become
unstable
as
a
result
of
the
project,
and
potentially
result
in
on-
or
offsite
landslide,
lateral spreading,
subsidence,
liquefaction
or
collapse?
d.
Be
located
on
expansive
soil
, as
defined
in
Table
18-1-B
of
the
Uniform
Building
Code
(1994)
,
creating
substantial
direct
or
indirect
risk
to
life
or
orooertv?
e.
Have
soils
incapable
of
adequately
supporting
the
use
of
septic
tanks
or
alternative
wastewater
disposal
systems
where
sewers
are
not
available
for
the
disposal
of
wastewater?
f.
Directly
or
indirectly
destroy
a
unique
paleontological
resource
or
site
or
unique
geologic
feature?
43 of
56 POTENTIALLY
POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT
SIGNIFICANT
UNLESS
IMPACT
MITIGATION
IN
CORPORA
TED
15 Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
18 LESS
THAN
NO
SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
IMPACT
X X X X X X X X
April 2, 2024, Item #8
EIS
and
Checklist
risk
of
loss,
injury
or
death
involving
a.
Violate
any
water
quality
standards
or
waste
discharge
requirements
or
otherwise substantially
degrade
surface
or
round
water
ualit
?
b.
Substantially
decrease
groundwater
supplies
or
interfere
substantially
with
groundwater
recharge
such
that
the
project
may
impede
sustainable
groundwater
management
of
the
basin?
c.
Substantially
alter
the
existing
drainage
pattern
of
the
site
or
area,
including
through
the
alteration
of
the
course
of
a stream
or
river,
or
through
the
addition
of
impervious
surfaces,
in
a
manner
which
would:
(i)
result
in
substantial
erosion
or
siltation
on-
or
offsite?
(ii)
substantially
increase
the
rate
or
amount
of
surface
runoff
in
a
matter
which
would
result
in
floodin
on-
or
offsite;
<iii)
create
or
contribute
runoff
water
which
would
exceed
the
capacity
of
existing
or
planned
stormwater
drainage
systems
or
provide
substantial
additional
sources
of
olluted
runoff;
or
d.
In
flood
hazard,
tsunami,
or
seiche
zones,
risk
release
of
pollutants
due
to
ro·ect
inundation?
e.
Conflict
with
or
obstruct
implementation
of
a
water
quality
control
plan
or
sustainable
roundwater mana
ement
Ian?
44 of
56 17
Resolution
No.
21-067 Page
20 X X X X X X X X X
April 2, 2024, Item #8
EIS
and
Checklist
extension
of
roads
or
other
infrastructure)?
b.
Displace
substantial
numbers
of
existing
people
or
housing,
necessitating
the
construction
of
re
lacement
housin
elsewhere?
a.
Would
the
project
result
in
substantial
adverse
physical
impacts
associated
. with
the
provision
of
new
or
physically
altered
governmental
facilities
, need
for
new
or
physically
altered
governmental
facilities,
the
construction
of
which
could
cause
significant
environmental
impacts,
in
order
to
maintain
acceptable
service
ratios,
response
times
or
other
performance
objectives
for
any
of
the
ublic
services
.
iii.
Schools?
iv.
Parks?
a.
Would
the
project
increase
the
use
of
existing
neighborhood
and
regional parks
or
other
recreational
facilities
such
that
substantial
physical
deterioration
of
the
facility
would
occur or
be
accelerated?
b.
Does
the
project
include
recreational
facilities
or
require
the
construction
or
expansion
of
recreational
facilities
which
might
have
an
adverse
• h
•
I
ff
t
th
•
t?
XVII.
TRANSPORTATION Would
the
project:
a.
Conflict
with
program
plan,
ordinance
or
policy
addressing
the
circulation
system
, including
transit,
roadway,
bicycle
and
pedestrian
facilities?
b.
Would
the
project
conflict
or
be
inconsistent
with
CEQA
Guidelines
section
15064
.3,
subdivision
(b}?
C.
Substantially
increase
hazards
due
to
a
geometric
design
feature
(e.g
.:
sharp
curves
or
dangerous
45 of
56 19
Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
22 X X X
X X
X
April 2, 2024, Item #8
EIS
and
Checklist
b.
Have
sufficient
water
supplies
available
to
serve
the
project
and
reasonably
foreseeable
future
development
during
normal
, dry
and
multiole
dry
years?
C.
Result
in
the
determination
by
the
wastewater
treatment
provider,
which
serves
or
may
serve
the
project,
that
it
has
adequate
capacity
to
serve
the
project's
projected
demand
in
addition
to
the
provider's
existinq
commitments?
d.
Generate
solid
waste
in
excess
of
state
or
local standards,
or
in
excess
of
the capacity
of
local
infrastructure,
or
otherwise
impair
the
attainment
of
solid
waste
reduction
qoals?
e.
Comply
with
federal,
state
and
local
management
and
reduction
statutes
and
regulations
related
to
solid
waste?
XX.
WILDFIRE
If
located
in
or
near
State
responsibility
areas
or
lands
classified
as
very
high
fire
hazard
severity
zones
, would
the
project:
a.
Substantially
impair
an
adopted
emergency
response
plan
or
emeraencv
evacuation
plan?
b. Due
to
slope,
prevailing
winds
, and
other
factors,
exacerbate
wildfire
risks,
and
thereby
expose
project
occupants
to,
pollutant
concentrations
from
a
wildfire
or
the
uncontrolled
spread
of
a
wildfire?
C.
Require
the
installation
or
maintenance
of
associated
infrastructure
(such
as
roads,
fuel
breaks,
emergency
water
sources,
power
lines
or
other
utilities)
that
may
exacerbate
fire
risk
or
that
may
result
in
temporary
or
ongoing
impacts
to
the
environment?
d.
Expose
people
or
structures to
significant
risks,
including
downslope
or
downstream
flooding
or
landslides
,
as
a
result
of
runoff,
post-fire
slope
instabilitv,
or
drainage
changes?
46 of
56 :
21 Resolution
No
. 21
-067
Page
24 X
-
X X X
' ' '
X X X X
April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
26 EIS
and
Checklist
D.
47 of
56 DISCUSSION
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
EVALUATION
Please
refer
to
the
Environmental Initial
Study
Checklist
Form
above
when
reading
the
following
evaluation
.
I.
AESTHETICS
:
a.
No
Impact.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
an
assigned
RHNA
allocation
of
1,319
housing
units
for
development
from
June
30,
2020
through
April
29,
2029.
To
ensure
that
significant
impacts
to
scenic
vistas
or
scenic
resources
do
not
occur,
future
development
of
residential
uses
will
be
in
accordance
with
applicable
City
standards
and
guidelines,
as
well
as
requirements
mandated
during
the
environmental
review
of
individual
projects
.
In
addition,
new
residential
development,
with
the
exception
of
new
affordable
housing,
may
be
subject
to
a
Development
Review
permit
by
the
City
Council
• that
will
address
project
design
issues
pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
the
Poway
Municipal
Code
(PMC).
The
same
standards,
guidelines
and
Development
Review
requirements
would
also
address
aesthetics
maintaining
the
existing
visual
character
of
the
individual
sites
and
surroundings
and
address
potential
light
and
glare
impacts
from
a
specific
design
proposal.
Affordable
housing
will
be
subject
to
a
design
review
process
that
will
be
intended
to
also
maintain
the
existing
visual
character
of
the
individual
sites
and
surroundings
and
address
potential
light
and
glare
impacts
from
a
specific
design
proposal.
Therefore,
adherence
to
City
standards
and/or
requirements
will
result
in
no
impacts.
No
mitigation
measures
are
required
.
b.
See
response
I.a.
above.
c.
See
response
I.a.
above.
d.
See
response
I.a
. above
.
II.
AGRICULTURAL
AND
FORESTRY_RESOURCES:
a.
No
Impact.
There
is
no
land
within
the
City
of
Poway
that
is
shown
as
Prime
Farmland,
Unique
Farmland
or
Farmland
of
statewide
Importance
on
the
San
Diego
County
Important
Farmland
map
produced
by
the State
Department
of
Conservation,
Division
of
Land
Resource
Protection,
Farmland
Mapping
and
Monitoring
Program
(California
Department
of
Conservation
2008).
Therefore,
there
would
be
no
impacts
to
agricultural
resources
. The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
does
not
change
any
boundaries
or
the
potential
for
agricultural
activities
.
There
are
no
proposals
contained
in
the
Housing
Element
update
to
convert
Prime
Farmland
or
any
farmland
of
unique
or
statewide
Importance.
There
are
also
no
proposals
that
would
conflict
with
existing
agricultural
zoning
or
a
Williamson
Act
contract,
or
result
in
the
conversion
of
Prime
Farmland,
Unique
Farmland,
or
Farmland
of
statewide
Importance
to
non-agricultural
use,
or
conversion or
loss
of
forest
land
. In
addition,
because
the
City
does
not
contain
forest
land,
there
is
no
rezoning
or
development
proposed
on
forest
land,
or
land
23 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No.
21-067 Page
28 EIS
and
Checklist
48 of
56 IV.
BIOLOGICAL
RESOURCES:
a.
Less
than
Significant
Impact.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
an
assigned
growth
need
of
1,319
housing
units
for
development
from
June
30,
2020
through
April
29,
2029.
Of
that
total,
519
housing
units
were
under
construction
or
entitled
as
of
December
2020,
leaving
a
remaining
need
of
800
housing
units.
Approximately
53 percent
of
the
City's
land
area
is
within
the
Mitigation
Area
of
the
Poway
Subarea
Habitat
Conservation
Plan
(HCP).
The
Poway
Subarea
lies
in
an
area
of
overlap
between
two
sub-regional
NCCP
plan
areas
in
the
San
Diego
region:
the
MSCP
and
the
MHCP.
The
northern
edge
of
the
Poway Subarea
also
overlaps
the
Focused
Planning
Area
of
the
San
Dieguito
River
Valley
Park.
The
sites
identified
as
appropriate
for
low-
and
moderate
income
housing
are
not
located
within
the
Mitigation
Area
of
the
HCP.
However,
it
is
expected
that
above
moderate-income
housing
may
be
constructed within
the
rural
residential
areas
of
the
City
that
coincide
with
the
boundaries
of
the
HCP
Mitigation
Area.
Without
a
specific
project,
it is
not
possible
to
anticipate
how
the
development
of
these
new
housing
units
will
potentially
impact
sensitive
biological resources
including
riparian
habitats,
federally
protected
wetlands
or
other
sensitive
natural
communities,
however,
no
conflict
with
the
provisions
of
the
HCP
is
proposed
or
anticipated
and
compliance
will
be
required.
The
HCP
requires
limitations
on
the
amount
of
biological
impact
on
each
property
and
a
Biological
Conservation
Easement
(BCE)
will
be
required
as
properties
develop.
It
is
also
not
possible
to
anticipate
how
the
development
of
new
housing
will
specifically
affect
the
movement
of
native
resident
or
migratory
fish
or
wildlife
species,
adversely
affect
wildlife
corridors
or
impeded
the
use
of
native
wildlife
nursery
sites.
The
City
does
have
a
tree
protection
ordinance
(Poway
Municipal
Code
Chapter
12.32)
and
a
tree
inventory
on
a
specific
property
will
be
required
to
evaluate
the
need
to
mitigate
any
tree
removals
as
specified
by
City
codes.
To
ensure
significant
impacts
to
sensitive
biological
resources
do
not
occur,
future
development
of
residential
units
will
be
in
accordance
with
applicable
City
standards
and
guidelines,
the
HCP,
the
State
and
Federal
Endangered
Species
Act,
as
well
as
requirements
mandated
during
the
environmental
review
of
individual
projects
for
sites
identified
for
above
moderate-income
housing.
Adherence
to
such
requirements
will
reduce
potential
impacts
associated
with
biological
resources
to
less
than
a
significant
level.
No
mitigation
measures
are
required
.
c.
See
response
IV.a.
above.
d.
See
response
IV.a
. above.
e.
See
response
IV.a.
above.
f.
No
Impact.
See
response
IV.a.
above.
V.
CULTURAL
RESOURCES
:
a.
Less
than
Significant
Impact.
CEQA
Guidelines Section
15064.5
defines
historic
resources
as
any object,
building,
structure,
site,
area,
place,
record,
manuscript
or
other
resource
listed
or
determined
to
be
eligible
for
listing
by
the
25 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
30 EIS
and
Checklist
49 of
56 production
resulting
from
the
combustion
of
fossil
fuels
for
transportation
purposes.
Adherence
to
such
requirements
will
reduce
potential
impacts
associated
greenhouse
gas
emissions
to
less
than
a
significant
level.
According
to
the
U.S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
the
burning
of
fossil
fuels
, along
with
deforestation
, has
caused
the
concentrations
of
heat-trapping
greenhouse
gasses
(GHGs)
to
increase
significantly
in
the
earth's
atmosphere
(U
.S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
2012)
. The
increase
in
GHGs
results
in
global
warm
ing,
as
more
heat
is
trapped
in
the
atmosphere
.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
would
not,
in
itself
,
produce
environmental
impacts
.
The
Housing
Element
update identifies
sites
that
can
accommodate
the
City's
RHNA
of
1,319
new
housing
units
through
2029.
The
potential impacts
related
to
GHG
emissions
and
global
warming
for
any
specific
future
residential
projects
may
be
assessed
at
the
time
the
projects
are
actually
proposed
.
Mitigat
ion
measures
would
be
adopted
as
necessary
, in
conformance
with
CEQA.
No
mitigation
measures
are
required
.
b.
No
Impact.
See
response
VI.a
. above.
VII.
GEOLOGY
AND
SOILS:
a.i)
Less
Than
Significant
Impact.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
adequate
sites
in
areas
already
designated
for
residential
and
mixed-use
use
to
meet
the
City's
RHNA.
The
project
will
not
result
in
the
approval
of
any
physical
improvements
and
does
not
propose
any
changes
to
the
General
Plan
Community
Development
Element,
to
a
base
designation,
or
to
any
physical
development
standards
.
Though
it
proposes
neither
specific
development
projects
nor
changes
in
base
zoning,
the
Housing
Element
Update
identifies
opportunity
sites
that
are
feasible
for
development.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
could
indirectly
result
in
residential
development
and
improvement,
the
development
would
occur
in
residential
and
mixed-use
areas
of
the
City
already
designated
in
the
General
Plan
for
housing
.
Therefore,
development
within
these
sites
and
their
associated
impacts
have
already
been
accounted
for
in
association
with
the
adopted
General
Plan
or
Specific
Plan
.
In
addition,
any
future
development
projects
supported
by
the
2020-2029
Housing
Element
would
be
evaluated
at
the
project
proposal
stage
and
subject
to
the
state,
regional,
and
local
plans
, and
the policies
therein
.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
an
assigned
growth
need
of
1,319
housing
units
for
development
from
June
30,
2020
through
April
29,
2029.
Of
that
total,
519
housing
units
were
under
construction
or
entitled
as
of
December
2020,
leaving
a
remaining
need
of
800
housing
units.
Murphy
Canyon
Fault
is
the
nearest
main
southern
California
fault
, located
approximately
nine
miles
southwest
of
the
City
jurisdictional
boundary.
Three
major
fault
systems
within
the
project
vicinity
include
the
Elsinore,
San
Jacinto
and
Rose
Canyon
faults.
The
active
Elsinore
fault
trends
northwest
and
is
about
22 miles
northeast
of
Poway.
The
San
Jacinto
fault
is
also
an
active
northwest-trending
fault
about
45 miles
northeast
of
Poway
. The
Rose
Canyon
fault
is
located
about
16 to
20 miles
west
of
Poway
in
the
Pacific
Ocean
and
is
considered
potentially
active.
There
is
potential
for
some
local
damage
in
the
event
of
a
major
earthquake
along
one
of
these
fault
systems
which
could
result
in
significant
impacts
to
facilities
in
the
City.
While
the
potential
for
onsite
rupture
cannot
be
completely
discounted
(e.g.,
unmapped
27 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No.
21-067 Page
32 EIS
and
Checklist
50 of
56 number
of
new
vehicle
trips
typically
associated
with
residential
projects
and,
thus,
would
help
to
reduce
GHG
production
resulting
from
the
combustion
of
fossil
fuels
for
transportation
purposes.
Adherence
to
such
requirements
will
reduce
potential impacts
associated
greenhouse
gas
emissions
to
less
than
a
significant
level.
No
mitigation
measures
are
required.
No
conflict
with
an
applicable
plan,
policy
or
regulation
adopted
for
the
purpose
of
reducing
the
emissions
of
greenhouse
gases
is
anticipated
or
proposed.
b.
No
Impact.
See
response
VIII.a
. above.
IX.
HAZARDS
AND
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS:
a.
Less
Than
Significant
Impact.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
adequate
sites
in
areas already
designated
for
residential
and
mixed-use
use
to
meet
the
City's
RHNA.
The
project
will
not
result
in
the
approval
of
any
physical
improvements
and
does
not
propose
any
changes
to
the
General
Plan
Community
Development
Element,
to
a
base
designation,
or
to
any
physical
development
standards
.
Though
it
proposes
neither
specific
development
projects
nor
changes
in
base
zoning,
the
Housing
Element
Update
identifies
opportunity
sites
that
are
feasible
for
development.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
could
indirectly
result
in
residential
development
and
improvement,
the
development
would
occur
in
residential
and
mixed-use
areas
of
the
City
already
designated
in
the
General
Plan
for
housing.
Therefore,
development
within
these
sites
and
their
associated
impacts
have
already
been
accounted
for
in
association
with
the
adopted
General
Plan
or
Specific
Plan.
In
addition,
any
future
development
projects
supported
by
the
2020-2029
Housing
Element
would
be
evaluated
at
the
project
proposal
stage
and
subject
to
the state,
regional,
and
local
plans,
and
the
policies
therein
.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
an
assigned
growth
need
of
1,319
housing
units
for
development
from
June
30 ,
2020
through
April
29,
2029
.
Of
that
total,
519
housing
units
were
under
construction
or
entitled
as
of
December
2020,
leaving
a
remaining
need
of
800
housing
units
.
The
potential
release
of
hazardous
materials
is
an
ongoing
condition
that
is
regulated
by
federal
, state
and
local
regulations
.
This
condition
will
exist
with
or
without
the
project.
The
development
of
residential
units
will
take
place
on
undeveloped
or
underutilized
land.
Incidental
amounts
of
hazardous
materials
may
be
utilized
during
the
construction
and/or
occupation
of
new
residential
units.
In
addition,
it
is
anticipated
that
the
nature
and
quantity
of
hazardous
materials
util
ized
will
be
typical
of
those
of
residential
uses
and
would
not
be
significant.
The
City
of
Poway
is
not
located
within
an
area
of
influence
of
an
airport
land
use
plan
and
is
not
located
within
two
miles
of
a
public
airport
.
It
also
does
not
contain
any
pr
ivate
airstrips
.
Development
of
residential
units
will
be
consistent
with
applicable
requirements
of
adopted
emergency
response/evacuation
plans
.
New
res
idential
development
may
be
located
adjacent
to
areas
with
a significant
risk
for
property
damage
or
injury
resulting
from
wildland
fires.
The
City
has
adopted
the
Wi
ldland
Urban
Interface
Code
to
address
potential
impacts
in
these
areas.
An
analysis
of
potential
impacts
with
regard
to
hazards
and
hazardous
29 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No.
21-067 Page
34 EIS
and
Checklist
51 of
56 level
and
all
weather
access.
In
addition,
a
hydrology
study,
completed
by
a
qualified
civil
or
hydrological
engineer
is
required
for
housing
sites.
The
study
must
show that
there
will
be
no
changes
to
the
downstream
or
upstream
100-
year
floodplain
with
the
new
construction.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
adequate
sites
in
areas
already
designated
for
residential
and
mixed
use
use
to
meet
the
City's
RHNA.
The
project
will
not
result
in
the
approval
of
any
physical
improvements
and
does
not
propose
any
changes
to
the
General
Plan
Community
Development
Element,
to
a
base
designation,
or
to
any
physical
development
standards
.
Though
it
proposes
neither
specific
development
projects
nor
changes
in
base
zoning,
the
Housing
Element
Update
identifies
opportunity
sites
that
are
feasible
for
development.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
could
indirectly
result
in
residential
development
and
improvement,
the
development
would
occur
in
residential
and
mixed-use
areas
of
the
City
already
designated
in
the
General
Plan
for
housing
.
Therefore,
development
within
these
sites
and
their
associated
impacts
have
already
been
accounted
for
in
association
with
the
adopted
General
Plan
or
Specific
Plan.
In
addition,
any
future
development
projects
supported
by
the
2020-2029
Housing
Element
would
be
evaluated
at
the
project proposal
stage
and
subject
to
the
state,
regional,
and
local
plans,
and
the
policies
therein
.
During
the
environmental
review
of
any
future
housing
project
for
housing
sites,
the
development
will
be
reviewed
to
ensure
compliance
with
city
and
federal
standards
for
flood
protection.
New
projects
that
propose
housing
for
very
low
and
low-income
households
can
be
developed
by-right,
however,
will
have
to
comply
with
General
Plan
policies
and
PMC
requirements
for
development
within
a
floodplain
.
The
City
requires
a
Floodplain
Development
Permit
(ministerial)
for
any
development
within
a
floodplain
that
ensures
compliance
with
all
city
floodplain
regulations.
Adherence
to
applicable
city,
state
and/or
federal
regulations
will
be
applied
at
that
time
and
will
reduce
the
potential
impacts
to
below
a
level
of
significance.
No
mitigation
is
required.
The
City
is
not
located
adjacent
to
coastal
waters
so
no
impact
related
to
tsunamis
would
occur.
The
design,
construction,
placement
and
maintenance
of
any
water
retention,
detention
facilities
would
adhere
to
applicable
city
building
code
standards
and/or
previously
referenced
flood/erosion
control
requirements.
Therefore,
potential
impacts associated
with
seiche
or
mudflows
would
be
reduced
to
a
less
than
significant
level.
No
mitigation
is
required.
b.
See
response
X.a
. above.
c.
See
response
X.a.
above.
c.i)
See
response
X.a.
above.
c.ii)
See
response
X.a.
above
.
c.iii-iv)
See
response
X.a
. above
.
d.
See
response
X.a
. above.
31 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No.
21-067 Page
36 EIS
and
Checklist
52 of
56 does
not
allow
for
or
provide
housing.
Therefore,
no
impacts
would
result.
No
mitigation
is
required
.
b.
See
response
XII.a.
above
.
XIII.
NOISE: a.
Less
Than
Significant
Impact.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
adequate
sites
in
areas
already
designated
for
residential
and
mixed-use
use
to
meet
the
City's
RHNA.
The
project
will
not
result
in
the
approval
of
any
physical
improvements
and
does
not
propose
any
changes
to
the
General
Plan
Community
Development
Element,
to
a
base
designation,
or
to
any
physical
development
standards.
Though
it
proposes
neither
specific
development
projects
nor
changes
in
base
zoning,
the
Housing
Element
Update
identifies
opportunity
sites
that
are
feasible
for
development.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
could
indirectly
result
in
residential
development
and
improvement,
the
development
would
occur
in
residential
and
mixed-use
areas
of
the
City
already
designated
in
the
General
Plan
for
housing.
Therefore,
development
within
these
sites
and
their
associated
impacts
have
already
been
accounted
for
in
association
with
the
adopted
General
Plan
or
Specific
Plan.
In
addition,
any
future
development
projects
supported
by
the
2020-2029
Housing
Element
would
be
evaluated
at
the
project
proposal
stage
and
subject
to
the
state,
regional,
and
local
plans,
and
the
policies
therein.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
an
assigned
growth
need
of
1,319
housing
units
for
development
from
June
30,
2020
through
April
29,
2029.
Of
that
total,
519
housing
units
were
under
construction
or
entitled
as
of
December
2020,
leaving
a
remaining
need
of
800
housing
units.
Without
specific
details
regarding
each
new
housing
development,
it
is
not
possible
to
determine
potential
noise
impacts
and
specific
mitigation
measures.
However,
city
codes
have
established
noise
level
limits
for
residential
development
and
noise
mitigation
measures
are
required
as
part
of
any
new
residential
development.
This
includes
the
provision
of
noise
attenuation
walls
for
protection
from
traffic
noise
and
compliance
with
building
code
requirements
for
interior
noise
levels
.
All
future
development
for
housing
may
be
subject
to
site-specific
environmental
studies
with
regard
to
noise
impacts
and
compliance
with
city
codes
and
policies
would
be
required
.
New
projects
that
propose
housing
for
very
low-
and
low-income
households
can
be
developed
by-right,
however, will
be
required
to
comply
with
General
Plan
policies
and
PMC
requirements
for
noise
compliance
for
residential
developments
.
Adherence
to
applicable
city
regulations
would
reduce
the
potential
impacts
to
below
a
level
of
significance.
No
mitigation
is
required
.
b.
See
response
XIII.a.
above.
c.
No
Impact.
See
response
XIII.a.
above.
d.
Less
Than
Significant Impact.
See
response
XIII.a.
above.
XIV.
POPULATION
AND
HOUSING:
33 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
38 EIS
and
Checklist
53 of
56 Poway.
Public
services
are
adequate
to
serve
current
and
future
population.
Implementation
of
the
2020-2029
Housing
Element
is
not
expected
to
increase
the
demand
for
public
services.
Development
of
additional
housing
as
identified
in
the
2020-2029
Housing
Element
is
consistent
with
the
anticipated
population
growth
in
the
Poway
General
Plan
and
could
potentially
increase
the
demand
on
schools
.
All
new
residential
development
is
required
to
pay
school
impact
fees
to
offset
the
cost
of
providing
additional
services
.
Park-in
lieu
fees
or
the
provision
for
park
land
and
improvements
will
be
required
with
the
development
of
any
new
housing
development
to
offset
any
impacts
to
park
services.
Impacts
to
public
services
will
be
less
than
significant.
No
mitigation
is
required.
a.ii.
Police
Protection
-
See
response
XV.a.
above
.
a.iii.
Schools
-
See
response
XV.a
. above
.
a.iv.
Parks
-
See
response
XV.a.
above
.
a.v.
Other
Public
Facilities
-
See
response
XV.a.
above
.
XVI.
RECREATION: a.
Less
Than
Significant
Impact.
The
City
currently
has
17 parks,
including
two
regional
park
facilities
(Blue
Sky
Ecological
Preserve
and
Lake
Poway),
78 miles
of
trails
and
over
5,000
acres
of
dedicated
open
space.
New
development
anticipated
by
the
2020-2029
Housing
Element
may
increase
the
demand
for
parks
and
recreation
facilities
in
the
City.
Projects
would
be
required
to
pay
park
in-lieu
impact
fees
or
provide
park
land
and
improvements
pursuant
to
City
codes
. The
City
has
adequate
park
and
recreation
facilities
to
serve
existing
and
future
population
.
New
projects
that
propose
housing
will
be
encouraged
to
include
private
park/recreation
areas
within
individual
developments.
Impacts
will
be
less
than
significant.
No
mitigation
measures
are
requ
ired.
b.
See
response
XVI.a.
above.
XVII.
TRANSPORTATION:
a.
No
Impact.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
would
not
expand
the
area
in
which
development
is
permitted
under
the
General
Plan
or Zoning
Ordinance.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
adequate
sites
in
areas
already
designated
for
residential
and
mixed-use
use
to
meet
the
City's
RHNA.
The
project
will
not
result
in
the
approval
of
any
physical
improvements
and
does
not
propose
any
changes
to
the
General
Plan
Community
Development
Element,
to
a
base
designation,
or
to
any
physical
development
standards
.
Though
it
proposes
neither
specific
development
projects
nor
changes
in
base
zoning,
the
Housing
Element
Update
identifies
opportunity
sites
that
are feasible
for
development.
The 2020-2029
Housing
Element
could
indirectly
result
in
residential
development
and
improvement,
the
development
would
occur
in
residential
and
mixed-use
areas
of
the
City
already
designated
in
the
General
Plan
for
housing
.
Therefore,
development
within
these
sites
and
their
associated
impacts
have
already
35 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No
. 21-067 Page
40 EIS
and
Checklist
54 of
56 California
Office
of
Planning
and
Research's
Tribal
Consultation
Guidelines
(2005),
"the
intent
of
SB
18 is
to
provide
California
Native
American
tribes
an
opportunity
to
participate
in
local
land
use
decisions
at
an
early
planning
stage,
for
the
purpose
of
protecting,
or
mitigating
impacts
to
cultural
places
."
In
accordance
with
Government
Codes
Sections
65352.3
and
65342.4
and
Public
Resources
Code
Section
21080.3.1,
the
City
of
Poway,
as
Lead
Agency,
sent
a
letter
to
the
Tribal
Representatives
notifying
the
tribes
identified
by
the
Native
American
Heritage
Commission
(NAHC)
of
the
proposed
project
in
accordance
with
AB
52 and
SB
18. The
City
received
responses
from
the
Rincon
Band
of
Luiseno
Indians
tribe,
which
noted
they
are
not
traditionally
and
culturally
affiliated
within
the
geographic
area
within
the
City
of
Poway's
jurisdiction
.
Responses
to
the
AB
52 and
SB
18 consultation
notices
were
received
and
consultation
concluded.
Future
housing
projects
will
require
AB
52 and
SB
18 consultation
and
sacred
lands
file
searches
as
applicable.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
an
assigned
growth
need
of
1,319
housing
units
for
development
from
June
30,
2020
through
April
29,
2029.
Of
that
total,
519
housing
units
were
under
construction
or
entitled
as
of
December
2020,
leaving
a
remaining
need
of
800
housing
units.
To
ensure
significant
impacts
to
cultural
resources
do
not
occur,
future
development
of
residential
units
will
be
in
accordance
with
applicable
city,
state,
and
federal
standards
and
guidelines
including
General
Plan
policies
and
PMC
regulations.
The
City
has
adopted
a
list
of
Historical
Sites
List
which
is
implemented
through
the
City's
Historical
Structure
Ordinance
(PMC
Chapter
17.45).
The
City's
General
Plan
also
includes
a
Prehistoric
and
Historic
Resources
Element,
which
identifies
archaeologically
sensitive
areas
within
the
City.
If
a
site
identified
in
the
Residential
Sites
Inventory
has
a
high
or
moderate
probability
of
containing
historically
sensitive
areas,
an
archaeological
report
may
be
required.
Any
recommended
mitigation
measures
would
be
made
conditions
of
any
project
approval.
Adherence
to
such
requirements
will
reduce
potential
impacts
associated
with
cultural
resources
to
less
than
a
significant
level.
No
mitigation
measures
are
required.
a.ii)
See
response
XVlll.a.i.
above
.
XIX.
UTILITIES
AND
SERVICE
SYSTEMS:
a.
Less
Than
Significant
Impact.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
adequate
sites
in
areas
already
designated
for
residential
and
mixed-use
use
to
meet
the
City's
RHNA.
The
project
will
not
result
in
the
approval
of
any
physical
improvements
and
does
not
propose
any
changes
to
the
General
Plan
Community
Development
Element,
to
a
base
designation,
or
to
any
physical
development
standards.
Though
it
proposes
neither
specific
development
projects
nor
changes
in
base
zoning,
the
Housing
Element
Update
identifies
opportunity
sites
that
are
feasible
for
development.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
could
indirectly
result
in
residential
development
and
improvement,
the
development
would
occur
in
residential
and
mixed-use
areas
of
the
City
already
designated
in
the
General
Plan
for
housing.
Therefore,
development
within
these
sites
and
their
associated
impacts
have
already
been
accounted
for
in
37 April 2, 2024, Item #8
Resolution
No
. 21
-067
Page
42 EIS
and
Checklist
55 of
56 The
City
of
Poway
adopts
by
reference
the
International
Fire
Code
and
the
California
Fire
Code
.
Local
amendments
are
included
in
the
triennial
adoption
process
that
addresses
Poway's
unique
climatic,
geologic,
and
topographic
characteristics.
This
adoption
creates
Poway's
Fire
Code
within
the
Poway
Municipal
Code.
The
2020
-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
adequate
sites
in
areas
already
designated
for
residential
and
mixed-use
use
to
meet
the
City's
RHNA
.
The
project
will
not
result
in
the
approval
of
any
physical
improvements
and
does
not
propose
any
changes
to
the
General
Plan
Community
Development
Element,
to
a
base
designation,
or
to
any
physical
development
standards
.
Though
it
proposes
neither
specific development
projects
nor
changes
in
base
zoning,
the
2020-2029
Housing
Element
identifies
opportunity
sites
that
are
feasible
for
development.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
could
indirectly
result
in
residential
development
and
improvement,
the
development
would
occur
in
residential
and
mixed-use
areas
of
the
City
already
designated
in
the
General
Plan
for
housing.
Therefore,
development
within
these
sites
and
their
associated
impacts
have
already
been
accounted
for
in
association
with
the
adopted
General
Plan
or
Specific
Plan
.
In
addition,
any
future
development
projects
supported
by
the
2020
-2029
Housing
Element
would
be
evaluated
at the
project
proposal
stage
and
subject
to
the
state,
regional,
and
local
plans,
and
the
policies therein.
The
2020-2029
Housing
Element
update
identifies
an
assigned
growth
need
of
1,319
housing
units
for
development
from
June
30 , 2020
through
April
15,
2029.
Of
that
total,
519
housing
units
were
under construction
or
entitled
as
of
December
2020,
leaving
a
remaining
need
of
800
housing
units.
The
project
does
not
substantially
impair
an
adopted
emergency
response
plan
or
emergency
evacuation
plan.
The
project
does
not
exacerbate
wildfire
risks,
nor
expose
project
occupants
to
pollutant
concentrations
from
a
wildfire
or
the
uncontrolled
spread
of
a wildfire
.
The
project
does
not
require
the
installation
or
maintenance
of
associated
infrastructure
(such
as
roads,
fuel
breaks,
emergency
water
sources,
power
lines
or
other utilities)
that
may
exacerbate
fire
risk
or
that
may
result
in
temporary
or
ongoing
impacts
to
the
environment.
The
project
does
not
expose
people
or
structures
to
significant
risks,
including
downslope
or
downstream
flooding
or
landslides,
as
a result
of
runoff,
post-fire
slope
instability,
or
drainage
changes
.
New
projects
that
propose
housing
for
very
low-
and
low
income
households
can
be
developed
by-right,
however,
will
have
to
comply
with
General
Plan
policies
and
PMC
requirements
to
address
any
potential
wildfire
risks.
Adherence
to
applicable
city
policies
and
regulations
would
be
required
at
that
time
and
would
reduce
the
potential
impacts
to
below
a
level
of
significance
.
No
mitigation
is
required
.
b.
See
response
XX
.a
. above.
c.
See
response
XX.a
. above.
d.
See
response
XX.a
. above.
XXI.
MANDATORY
FINDING
OF
SIGNIFICANCE
:
39 April 2, 2024, Item #8
EIS
and
Checklist
Attachment(s): I
A
l!
"f
i+ii%
■
dLabels
_
~
-
:--,ar
dc
iic
i
R~nd1
1J
l3t:rn.
1r
clo
ijj C:,nr,
cl
'<-0
M
,:,unt.1in l,.1n
ch
ti ( ·11
t ~ I
.. ,
I I
::
·1~0
0 )ll
,;_
·111JI
!.l
I
l
ll
DM
.,.
j i l@
Get
X,Y
I
32°
59.649'
N,
117°
1.485'
W
56 of
56 Exhibit
A
Project
Location
Map
j Map
Legend
Resolution
No.
21-067 Page
44 ..
Califomi~
Coordinate
Grid
D
,.
PLSS
Township
D
.,
PLSS
Section
.,
••
·r.i/!
i
•
··.!
:,
t•
D
1-~
:,
; ',.
r-
/.
I
41 -.
~l ?\_'It'/. R
;,:I.
. D
l
I
--
r_J i
1-i,
!'.'.'
, .
•
:11
_
,1n
• .. ,d,,;
v~y
~..-.l
·, •i?
";,
_....,.,.-~·
-.J
~-;
•:t.
l
::
.!.
I