those modified by boundary adjustments, to maintain minimum standards for parcel usability. The proposed adjustment creates areas with widths of approximately 80 feet, which do not meet the required 110- foot minimum. Additionally, existing access provisions appear adequate for ongoing fire management activities.
C. The Boundary Ad
justment Creates Unusually Shaped Parcels . Poway Municipal Code Section 17.08.170(A) requires that the depth of a parcel to the width of a parcel shall not exceed a maximum ratio of 3:1. If that ratio is exceeded, the parcel shall be deemed an unusually shaped parcel. The City Council in its discretion finds that unusually shaped parcels are not necessary to preserve unique topographic or environmental features.
The existing parcel configuration does not exceed the parcel depth to width ratio and is not an unusually shaped parcel. In addition, the slope and existing habitat are more appropriately retained within the northern parcel for maintenance and access purposes, as currently configured, rather than modifying the southern parcel boundaries to incorporate these features.
D. The Boundar y Ad
justment Impairs Access. The proposed adjustment would impair access to the eastern portion of the property by creating a constrained access point between portions of the parcel, contrary to PMC Section 16.14.010(C). The area connecting the northeastern slopes to the southern parcel contains slopes covered with native vegetation that is a barrier to gaining access to the area. The existing parcel configuration complies with the code requirement whereas the parcel configuration proposed does not.
SECTION 3: The City Council’s decision to deny the Appeal is final, and the denial of BA 25-0002 by City staff on January 7, 2026, remains in full force and effect.
SECTION 4: The City Council’s decision to deny the Appeal is subject to judicial review under California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. //
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
19 of 27
May 5, 2026, Item #8
Resolution No. 26-
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 5th day of May, 2026 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
______________________________
Stev
e Vaus,
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Car
rie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
20 of 27
May 5, 2026, Item #8
May 5, 2026, Item #8
Dear
Neighbor,
My
name
is
Jonathan
Volfson,
and
my
family
and
I wanted
to
introduce
ourselves
and
share
some
information
about
a boundary
adjustment
application
we
submitted.
The
City
of
Poway
sent
out
notices
regarding
our
application
and
will
also
be
sending
notices
regarding
our
appeal
of
their
decision,
so
we
thought
it
might
be
helpful
to
explain
what
we
are
proposing.
My
father-in-law
purchased
the
parcels
shown
to
the
right;
East
of
Starridge
Park,
South
of
Awhahnee
Way,
and
West
of
Catawba
and
Pequot.
He
invited
our
family
to
build
an
ADU
alongside
his
future
home
. Per
City
of
Poway
code,
ADUs
are
maxed
at
1500
square
feet.
At
the
time,
we
were
a family
of
four
and
are
now
expecting
our
fifth
family
member
in
August.
Planning
for
the
years
ahead,
we
want
to
extend
two
walls
of
our
ADU
five
feet,
This
will
add
a little
space
and
a bedroom
for
our
third
child.
The
parcel
must
be
split
into
two
lots
before
the
expansion
is
allowed,
and
the
steep
natural
features
necessitate
a
boundary
adjustment
to
meet
City
slope
criteria
prior
to
said
lot
split
21 of
27 ATTACHMENT
E
May 5, 2026, Item #8
The
two
residential
structures
proposed
are
already
allowed
under
the
current
zoning.
The
purpose
of
the
boundary
adjustment
and
lot
split
is
to
modestly
expand
the
home
so
it
better
fits
the
needs
of
our
growing
family.
We
are
NOT
proposing
additional
buildings,
increased
density,
or
any
change
to
the
overall
residential
character
of
the
property.
In
conjunction,
we
are
proposing
an
open-space
easement
for
all
the
land
on
the
parcel
(outside
of
fire-zone
mitigations),
to
preserve
animal
habitat
&
a wet
meadow,
and
maintain
the
current
character
of
the
neighborhood.
We
have
heard
several
rumors
that
a
large
housing
complex
or
major
development
is
planned
for
this
property,
and
we
want
to
reassure
our
neighbors
that
this
is
simply
not
true.
The
proposal
involves
two
homes
only,
which
are
already
permitted
under
existing
zoning.
Separately,
neighbors
may
be
aware
of
an
existing
informal
walking
trail
through
our
property
used
for
hiking
access.
The
main
dwelling
will
obscure
part
of
the
existing
path,
making
hiking
access
unavailable.
In
an
effort
to
help
maintain
community
access,
we
offered
to
work
with
the
City
of
Poway
to
establish
a
replacement
hiking
trail
connection
to
Starridge
Park
(professionally
blazed
and
maintained).
The
hiking
path
easement
is
tied
to
the
boundary
adjustment
proposal.
The
city
denied
the
boundary
adjustment
because
the
proposed
boundaries
were
not
"square
enough."
Meaning
no
trail
and
the
community
loses
hiking
access
to
Starridge
Park.
We
filed
an
appeal,
and
the
City
Council
will
make
the
final
decision.
The
Council
may
approve
unusually
shaped
boundaries
when
they
ensure
preservation
of
unique
topographic
features
(open-space
easement)
and
areas
of
significant
community
importance
(Starridge
Hiking
Trail
Access).
With
your
support,
we
are
hopeful
the
City
Council
will
reconsider
the
denial.
The
appeal
only
relates
to
adjusting
lot
lines
between
our
two
parcels,
and
prepares
for
a lot
split.
The
end
result
is
6+
acres
of
dedicated/preserved
habitat,
a professional
hiking
trail
for
the
community,
and
a long-term
home
for
our
family.
We
would
love
to
connect
with
neighbors,
answer
any
questions,
and
hear
any
concerns.
We
will
be
hosting
a
neighborhood
meeting
to
talk
through
the
proposal
and
share
more
details
on
April
9th
in
Willow
Room
306
at
the
Poway
Community
Park,
13094
Civic
Center
Dr,
Poway
92064
from
5:30-7:00pm.
Our
family
will
be
there,
pizza
and
drinks
will
be
provided,
and
we
would
love
to
meet
our
future
neighbors.
Please
come
say
hello
and
introduce
yourselves!
We
need
neighborhood
support
for
the
appeal
to
be
granted,
and
the
easiest
way
to
do
that
is
by
emailing
to
[email protected].,
or
showing up
in
person
at
an
upcoming
City
Council
Meeting
(7pm
on
May
5 th
,
you'll
receive
a
notice).
Please
see
sample
below
..
Please
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
me
anytime.
Thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
read
this,
and
we
are
truly
excited
to
become
part
of
this
community.
22 of
27 May 5, 2026, Item #8
Warm
Regards,
Jonathan
and
Family
[email protected] Sample
E-mail:
[email protected] Dear
Mayor
and
City
Council
Members,
I live
near
the
Volfson
property
and
support
their
appeal.
I don't
see
their
small
request
affecting
my
home
or
daily
life,
and
the
hiking
trail
is
of
real
importance
to
the
community.
I hope
you
will
consider
approving
it.
Thank
you,
{Name] {Address]
23 of
27 May 5, 2026, Item #8
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
steve walls
Sara Trunzo
Volfson boundary adjustment proposal
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 10:22:24 AM
I You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL EMAfL
Poway Mayor and City Council Members,
Regarding the Volfson boundary adjustment proposal. ..
My wife and I, Mr. and Mrs. Steven Walls, Live at 12972 Cree Dr.
Our backyard overlooks the canyon and Starridge Park. We have resided here for many years. We feel that if the Volfson's are willing to include a professionally built and maintained hiking trail access to the park, and their boundary adjustment does not include additional residential properties, while maintaining easements and setbacks. That agreement seems like a win for all the residents, current and future.
We hope you all see it to grant their request.
Respectfully, Steven and Dawn Walls.
24 of 27 ATTACHMENT F
May 5, 2026, Item #8
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Marian
Crofts
<[email protected]>
Monday,
March
30,
2026
12:21
PM
Sara
Trunzo
Volfson
Property
I
You
don't
often
get
email
from
mariancrofts@gmai
l.com
. Learn
why
this
is
important
EXTERNAL
EMAIL
Dear
Mayor
and
City
Council
Members,
I reside
near
the
Volfson
property
and
support
their
appeal.
Their
request
will
not
affect
my
home
or
daily
life,
and
I support
keeping
hiking
access
to
the
Starridge
Park.
Please
consider
approving
the
appeal.
Thank
you,
Marian
Crofts
12937
Cree
Ct,
Poway
CA
25 of
27 May 5, 2026, Item #8
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Importance:
RQn..KQb_l
Sara Trunzo
Volfson property proposal
Wednesday, April 1, 2026 9:15:20 AM
0utlook-fooba4du.png
High
I You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
EXTERNAL EMAIL
I am very against the Poway property proposed for the Volfson family. If this went thorough, the open space will very much missed by many of US.
The open-space is used to walk by many in the StarRidge and Heritage Hills communities. Please deny any buildings in that area, as it would ruin the open-space.
Thank you,
Ron
Ron Kohl
Rotary District 5340 Assistant Governor 2023-26
Rotary Cruise to Change Lives, benefiting The Rotary Foundation 2023, 24, 25 & 26 Expedia Cruises
San Diego, California
Email: [email protected]
Web site: https://www.ExpediaCruises.com/ronkohl
Phone: 858-518-0983
The highest compliment I can receive is when you refer your family, friends and business associates.
Hotels -Tours -Land Packages -Expeditions -Luxury Vacations -Adventure Travel -All Inclusive Resorts -Flights -Corporate/Group Travel -River Cruises -Wine Cruises Rotary~
CST: 2163720-40. This business has a trust account and participates in the California Travel Consumer Restitution Fund. www.tcrcinfo.org
26 of 27
May 5, 2026, Item #8
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Gerald Southard
Sara Trunzo
Volfson Property
Thursday, April 9, 2026 7:33:52 PM
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https-Uaka ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification]
EXTERNAL EMAIL
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I live near the Volfson property and support their appeal. I do not see their small request affecting my home or daily life, and the hiking trail is ofreal importance to the community. I hope that you will consider approving it.
Thank you,
Gerald and Leah Southard
13632 Catawba Dr.
Poway, CA. 92064
I will sail my vessel
'Ti! the river runs dry
27 of 27
1 of 8
May 5, 2026, Item #9
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AGENDA REPORT CityofPoway
May 5, 2026
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Alan Fenstermacher, City Attorney
Alan Fenstermacher, City Attorney
[email protected]
CITY COUNCIL
Resolution to Establish the Policy and Procedures for Recessing and Reconvening Hybrid Brown Act Meetings as a Result of a Disruption in Remote Participation Under Senate Bill (SB) 707 (enacted in 2025), all qualified legislative bodies of local government agencies in California must now offer hybrid meetings through a two-way phone or video platform commencing on July 1, 2026. This requirement applies to the Poway City Council. Or:
Under Senate Bill (SB) 707 (enacted in 2025), certain provisions became effective on January 1, 2026, with additional requirements applicable to eligible legislative bodies beginning July 1, 2026. As a qualifying legislative body under the law, the City of Poway's City Council must comply with these phased requirements, including the mandate to provide hybrid meetings via a two-way phone or video platform commencingJuly 1, 2026.
Additionally, the City Council is required to adopt a policy for procedures to recess and reconvene the hybrid meeting if there is a technological disruption affecting remote participation.
Staff recommends adoption of a resolution (Attachment A) establishing a Technology Disruption Policy for recessing and reconvening meetings held pursuant to SB 707 from July 1, 2026, until SB 707 expires or is repealed. If approved, this policy will have the effect of ensuring the City of Poway is in compliance with SB 707 in advance of the law's commencement date on July 1, 2026.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment A) establishing a Technology Disruption Policy in compliance with Senate Bill 707 at the May 5, 2026 Regular City Council meeting.
2 of 8
May 5, 2026, Item #9
Discussion:
Hybrid Meetings/ Two-Way Remote Participation by the Public On October 3, 2025, California Governor Newsom signed into law SB 707, which amended the Brown Act to diversify and increase public engagement in meetings of local legislative bodies.
As a requirement under SB 707, the qualified legislative body of local government agencies in California must now offer hybrid meetings through a two-way phone or video platform commencing on July 1, 2026 and ending on January 1, 2030 (unless extended or made permanent), and adopt a policy for recessing and reconvening meetings when there is a technological disruption affecting remote participation. A qualified legislative body is defined in a way to include the City Council of the City of Poway.
In compliance with legislative amendments enacted by SB 707, beginning on July 1, 2026, the City Council shall conduct its proceedings as hybrid meetings through a two-way phone or video platform.
Accordingly, the City must also provide members of the public with the ability to attend and offer public comment through the same hybrid platform. Remote participants will be given the same amount of speaking time as those attending in person. The City will continue to utilize Zoom.
In the event of a disruption in two-way remote participation, including, but not limited to Zoom, during a City Council meeting, the disruption of which prevents members of the public from remotely attending or observing the meeting, the City Council may not reconvene open session until at least one hour has passed or service has been restored, whichever occurs first. Alternatively, the meeting may be adjourned.
Should remote participation fail to be restored after good faith efforts are made, the City Council shall adopt, by roll-call vote, a formal finding affirming reasonable efforts were made to resolve the disruption, but having been unsuccessful, and the public interest in resuming the meeting without remote participation outweighs further delay in conducting the business meeting. Language will be added to the City Council agenda template outlining these procedures.
Upon adoption of a resolution establishing SB 707 policies, City staff will perform outreach efforts to the community to advise of methods for participation in the hybrid meeting format in advance of implementation of hybrid meetings on July 1, 2026.
It should be noted that staff will monitor legislation for updates and bring an item to the City Council for direction as the sunset date of January 1, 2030, nears, or other changes are made.
Remote Participation by a Member of the City Council
SB 707 more clearly outlines teleconference requirements related to two-way audio/visual participation by members of the legislative body. Zoom or a similar platform meets this criteria, and the process whereby the City Council must vote in open session on a member's need to participate remotely under emergency circumstances, such as illness, still applies. Traditional remote participation, where the alternative location is noticed on the agenda, is also still available. 3 of 8
May 5, 2026, Item #9
Participant Behavior
SB 707 expands the authority of the presiding member of the legislative body or their designee, to remove an individual, or limit the participation of any person who engages in behavior that disrupts, disturbs, impedes, or renders infeasible the orderly conduct of the meeting to include members of the public participating remotely. Depending on the exact circumstances, this would potentially include the explicit, obscene or parody remote participation that has occurred in the past in the City, when Zoom participation was previously available.
Environmental Review:
None.
Fiscal Impact:
While the immediate fiscal impact of this report is minimal, there may be future costs associated with follow-up actions, such as software needs. Should any such costs exceed the City Manager's approval authority, they would be brought back for City Council approval.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
A. Resolution
Tracy vens
Assistant City Manager
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
ala Chris Hazeltine
City Manager
4 of 8
May 5, 2026, Item #9
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 26-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
POWAY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE POLICY FOR
RECESSING AND RECONVENING MEETINGS HELD PURSUANT
TO THE BROWN ACT AND SENATE BILL 707 IN THE EVENT OF
A DISRUPTION IN REMOTE PARTICIPATION
WHEREAS, on October 3, 2025, California Governor Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 707, codified primarily at Section 54953.4 of the California Government Code (SB 707), which amended the Brown Act to diversify and increase public engagement in meetings of local legislative bodies;
WHEREAS, as a requirement under SB 707, all qualified legislative bodies of local government agencies in California must now offer hybrid meetings through a two-way phone or video platform commencing on July 1, 2026, unless the technology is not available at the meeting location or the meeting qualifies for an exemption, such as an offsite tour; WHEREAS, as written, the State requirement to offer hybrid meetings will sunset on January 1, 2030 unless further legislative action is taken at the State level; WHEREAS, a qualified legislative body on the local level is defined as an elected legislative body empowered to enact local resolutions and regulations that govern the community; and
WHEREAS, SB 707 requires the City Council to formally adopt a policy, attached hereto as "Exhibit A", on or before July 1, 2026, establishing the procedure for recessing and reconvening a meeting in the event of a disruption of remote participation, and the efforts the City shall make to attempt to restore service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Poway as follows:
SECTION 1: The above recitations are true and correct.
SECTION 2: In compliance with recent legislative amendments enacted by Senate Bill 707 (primarily codified in Section 54953.4 of the California Government Code), beginning on July 1, 2026 and ending when the legislative enactments expire or are repealed, the City Council shall conduct its proceedings as hybrid meetings through a two-way phone or video platform, unless the technology is not available at the meeting location for a particular meeting, or the meeting qualifies for a bona fide exemption.
SECTION 3: In the event of a disruption in two-way remote participation, including, but not limited to Zoom, during a City Council meeting, the disruption of which prevents members of the public from remotely attending or observing the meeting, the City Council may not reconvene open session until at least one hour has passed or service has been restored, whichever occurs first.
Alternatively, the meeting may be adjourned.
SECTION 4: Should remote participation fail to be restored after good faith efforts are made, the City Council shall adopt, by roll-call vote, a formal finding affirming reasonable efforts were made to resolve the disruption, but having been unsuccessful, the public interest in resuming the meeting 5 of 8
May 5, 2026, Item #9
without remote participation outweighs further delay in conducting the meeting.
Resolution No. 26-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Poway, California on the 5th day of May, 2026 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
DISQUALIFIED:
Steve Vaus, Mayor
ATTEST:
Carrie Gallagher, CMC, City Clerk
6 of 8
May 5, 2026, Item #9
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 26-
Background:
City of Poway
POLICIES & PROCEDURES
Policy No.
Date Issued
Date Revised
Date Superseded
Department City Clerk's Office
TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTION POLICY
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
Senate Bill 707 (2025) amended the Brown Act to require the City Council to adopt, on or before July 1, 2026, a policy addressing how the agency will respond to disruptions in telephonic or internet service that prevent members of the public from attending or observing a City Council meeting remotely. This policy is adopted to comply with that requirement and to ensure continuity of public participation during technical disruptions.
Purpose:
This policy establishes procedures for responding to a disruption in the telephonic or internet services that provide two-way remote public access to meetings of the City Council, as required by the Brown Act (Gov. Code § 54953.4). The policy ensures transparency, public participation, and continuity of government during technology disruptions.
Policy:
Definitions:
For purposes of this policy:
• "Disruption" means any failure, outage, or other interruption that prevents members of the public from attending or observing the meeting via these remote access services. • "Remote access services" means the two-way telephonic service and/or two-way audiovisual platform used to provide real-Orne remote public attendance and observation of meetings.
Applicability:
This policy applies to all open and public meetings of the City Council at which remote public participation is offered or required under the Brown Act.
Procedures:
A. Response to Service Disruption
If the Presiding Officer or Clerk becomes aware of a disruption to the agency's remote access services that prevents members of the public from attending or observing the 7 of 8
May 5, 2026, Item #9
Resolution No. 26-
meeting remotely:
1. The Presiding Officer or Clerk shall immediately announce the disruption to the public.
2. The Presiding Officer may then call for a recess of the open session or convene the legislative body in closed session, consistent with the Brown Act.
3. Staff shall begin efforts to diagnose and restore the disrupted service.
4. The meeting shall remain in recess for at least one hour or until service is restored, whichever is sooner. The recess period may be extended if restoration efforts are ongoing.
B. Efforts to Restore Service
The agency shall make good faith efforts to restore remote access services, which may include:
• Troubleshooting platform or teleconferencing software • Resetting or replacing audiovisual equipment
• Attempting alternative connection methods
• Contacting necessary support staff or service providers • Switching to back-up equipment or platforms, if available The City Clerk, in consultation with staff or designated contractors from the Information Technology Services Department, shall document the restoration efforts undertaken.
C. Reconvening the Open Session
Timing:
The open session may be reconvened a er at least one hour has elapsed from the time of disruption or as soon as service is restored, whichever occurs earlier.
If Service is Restored:
If the remote access service is restored before or at the time the meeting reconvenes, the meeting shall continue as normal.
If Service is Not Restored:
If service has not been restored after one hour, the City Council may reconvene and:
1. Adjourn the meeting
2. Continue the meeting in open session by adopting, by roll call vote, the following, or a substantially similar, finding:
8 of 8
May 5, 2026, Item #9
Resolution No. 26-
"City Staff have made good faith efforts to restore telephonic or internet service in accordance with the adopted City Council policy, and the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote public access." Upon adoption of the finding, the City Council may continue the open session despite the fact that remote access services have not been restored.
D. Recordkeeping
The City Clerk shall enter a brief statement into the meeting minutes, including the following:
• The nature and time of the disruption
• The restoration efforts undertaken
• The time the meeting was reconvened (if applicable)
• Any finding adopted pursuant to Section C
E. Review and Updates
This policy may be amended by the City Council at a noticed public meeting in open session, not on the consent calendar.
Reviewed/Approved By:
Tracy Stevens
Assistant City Manager
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Approved By:
Chris Hazeltine
City Manager
May 5, 2026, Item #10
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AG EN DA REPORT City of Poway
May 5, 2026
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Carrie Gallagher, City Clerk uC4-,.
Carrie Gallagher, City Clerk (/
(858) 668-4535 or [email protected]
Appointment to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee
CITY COUNCIL
At the December 16, 2025 Regular City Council meeting, Council approved the Local Appointments List of City Council Appointed Committees for 2026. The recent resignation of a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee (PRAC) created an unscheduled vacancy. The City Clerk's Office placed a notice of unscheduled vacancy on the bulletin board outside City Hall and on the City website.
The application period was opened on Monday, March 23, 2026 and closed on Friday, April 17, 2026.
Three (3) applications were received from residents wishing to serve on the PRAC.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council approve to appoint one (1) member to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee, as nominated by Council, to include a one (1) one-year term (partial term) expiring December 31, 2026.
Discussion:
Government Code Sections 54970-54974, also known as the Maddy Act, is a means of increasing the public's awareness of opportunities to be appointed to their commissions or committees. The City currently has two committees that fall under these provisions of the government code -the Budget Review Committee (BRC) and PRAC.
At the December 16, 2025 Regular City Council meeting, Council approved the Local Appointments List of City Council Appointed Committees for 2026. The PRAC listed no vacancies.
The PRAC consists of five members appointed by the Mayor with the concurrence of the City Council.
Each Councilmember can offer one nomination for appointment to each of the committees for Council consideration if a vacancy exists within their Council district.
Due to the recent resignation of the District 2 appointee, the City has one (1) vacancy on the PRAC. 1 of 2
May 5, 2026, Item #10
The appointee for the unscheduled vacancy created by the resignation will serve out the remaining term expiring in December 2026.
Application materials for the unscheduled vacancy were made available on the City's website and in the City Clerk's Office between the period of Monday, March 23, 2026 through 5:00 p.m. on Friday, April 17, 2026. Three (3) applications were received from residents wishing to serve on the PRAC.
Staff received the following nominations from Council for the PRAC:
Budget Review Committee -1 Vacancy
Mayor or City Councilmember
Vacant (District 2)
Environmental Review:
Nominee
Dan Hober
Length of Term
One Year (1) Ending December 31, 2026
This action is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Public Notification:
None.
Attachments:
None.
Assistant City Manager
2 of 2
Reviewed By:
Alan Fenstermacher
City Attorney
Ap;;h
Chris Hazeltine
City Manager