Cities Index.
Item 12 - Visual Slideshow provided by Staff at Meeting

Poway City Council
May 19, 2026

Document
Item 12 - Visual Slideshow provided by Staff at Meeting
Meeting
May 19, 2026
Body
Poway City Council
Pages
15
Original file
5 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

CITYWIDE FEE STUDY OVERVIEW AND

CONSIDERATION
MAY 19, 2026
1 • History
• Fee Analysis and Compilation Process
• Policy Considerations
• Legal Compliance
• Timeline
• Matrix Consulting Overview
Overview
2 3

HISTORY
• Last Master Fee Schedule Comprehensive Study = Dec. 2007 • Various incremental updates over past 19 years
• No current inflationary adjustment for most fees
• Awarded a consultant agreement with Matrix Consulting = April 2024
• Phase 1: Cost Allocation Plan complete and published in 2025 • Phase 2: Complete Citywide Fee Study
Master Fee Schedule Facts
Poway reviewed and updated over 800 fees as included in the Attachment A.

Incorporates fees from various user beneficial categories, including; • Administrative Services (Finance)
• Community Services
• Fire Department
• Planning Services
• Code Compliance
• Housing
• Building Services
• Engineering

4 • Consultant: Matrix
• Process:
• Analyze service costs
• Coordination between staff and consultant on costs and time estimates (bottom up)
• Incorporate overhead and ancillary costs
• Consider feasibility and goals
• Incorporate best practices in recommendations
Fee Analysis and Compilation Process
5 Policy Considerations
6 • Individual/Group benefit vs Global Benefit
• Full Cost Recovery vs Subsidy
• “Don’t harm the little guy”
• Avoid disincentivizing compliance
• Generally, growth pays for growth
• Annual Inflationary Index adjustments between rate studies Legal Compliance
7 • Proposition 26: passed in 2010, specifically outlines the difference between a fee and a tax and dictates that fees must be directly related to a service and cannot exceed the reasonable cost of that service. • CA Government Code § 50076: clarifies that fees for service costs are not special taxes and do not need voter approval.
• CA Government Code § 65104: gives local governments the authority to charge planning and zoning fees to recover processing costs. • May 19, 2026 – City Council meeting
• Upon approval starts a 60-day period before implementation • July 20, 2026 = Fees become effective
• July 1, 2027 begins annual Consumer Price Index Inflationary Adjustment
Timeline
8 Matrix Consulting Overview
9 COMPREHENSIVE USER

FEE STUDY RESULTS

CITY OF POWAY, CALIFORNIA
MATRIX

CONSULTING GROUP
11 STUDY OBJECTIVES

STREAMLINE FEE

STRUCTURE
Consolidate, Expand, Add /
Remove Fees

LEGAL COMPLIANCE
Compliance with Prop 26 &
CA Gov Code

TIME ASSUMPTIONS
Identify the average level
of effort associated with
activities

COMPARATIVE SURVEY
Benchmark against other
jurisdictions

FULLY BURDENED

HOURLY RATES
Determine direct and
indirect costs

MASTER FEE LISTING
Provide all existing and
proposed fees in a
comprehensive manner

COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
m
12COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS

TIME ESTIMATE

FULLY BURDENED

HOURLY RATE

FULL COST FEE
• Average staff time by position title spent per permit, appl
ication, or fee-related activity.
• Salaries, Benefits, Productive Hours, Services & Supplies, S
upervisory Support, and Citywide Overhead.
• Maximum justifiable fee that can be assessed

FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
m
13 First Fee Study
N/A
The City has not
previously conducted
a comprehensive fee
study; this is the first
analysis of its kind
Fees Reviewed
470+
Flat fees, valuation-
based fees, regulatory
fees, deposit-based
fees, actual cost, etc.

Under-Recovery
$2.2M
Total gap between
current revenues and
full cost to provide the
service
Cost Recovery
59%
Overall recovery rate
across all service areas

FEE STUDY FINDINGS

COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
m
14COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS

FEE STUDY RESULTS
Division
Revenue at Current
Fee Total Cost Difference
Current Cost
Recovery %
Building $1,687,247 $1,909,586 ($222,339) 88%
Code Compliance $44,350 $57,532 ($13,182) 77%
Engineering $682,710 $1,279,791 ($597,081) 53%
Finance $224,181 $527,659 ($303,478) 42%
Fire $398,586 $906,563 ($507,976) 44%
Planning $129,037 $655,190 ($526,153) 20%
Total $3,166,112 $5,336,320 ($2,170,208) 59%
The largest deficits are in Engineering ($597K), Planning ($526K), and Fire ($508K).

Building has the highest recovery at 88%; Planning the lowest at 20%. m
15COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE STUDY RESULTS
Seek input from Council on proposed
Master Fee Schedule.

Adopt an annual fee escalator (CPI or
COLA) to ensure costs keep pace with fee
increases.

Conduct a comprehensive fee reevaluation
every 5-7 years to account for organizational,
process, and technology changes.

NEXT STEPS

← All documents from this meeting