DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Summary:
AG EN DA REPORT City of Poway
September 15, 2026
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Julie Procopio, Director of Development Services �
Tracy Beach, City Engineer
858-668-4652 or [email protected]
An Ordinance Adopting the 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey
CITY COUNCIL
Speed limits are set by adopting an Engineering and Traffic Survey (Survey) in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). An approved survey is valid for five years and can be extended to seven years or fourteen years if specific conditions are met. The current Survey was completed in 2019 and adopted in 2020.
An updated Engineering and Traffic Survey has been prepared considering recent speed data and updates to State law and is recommended for adoption.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended the City Council take public input, close the public hearing and introduce the Ordinance for first
reading by title only, waive further reading, and schedule the adoption of the Ordinance for the
October 6, 2026 Regular City Council meeting.
Discussion:
On
April 21, 2020, the City Council approved Ordinance 841 adopting the 2019 Engineering and Traffic Survey and setting current speed limits. The City's current (2019) Survey was prepared pursuant to the guidelines of the CA MUTCD and measures actual vehicle speeds, considers collision data and roadway conditions. The CA MUTCD calls for speed limits to be established based on the 85th percentile speed, which is the speed considered safe and reasonable. The CA MUTCD requires speed limits be rounded to the nearest 5 miles per hour (mph) increment and, in some cases, allows a reduction by 5 mph if the speed limit was initially rounded up.
A revision to the California MUTCD was adopted in 2026 that modified allowable reductions in speed limits. Additionally, the California Governor's office approved Assembly Bill (AB) 43 in 2021 and AB 1938 in 2022, providing local jurisdictions with the ability to lower speed limits on locally controlled roads and includes additional provisions affecting Survey procedures. Effective January 1, 2023, in concurrence with a Survey, municipalities can retain currently adopted speed limits or restore prior adopted speed limit.
1 of 12
September 15, 2026, Item #9
September 15, 2026, Item #9
New
speed
survey
data
was
collected
September
2025
and
May
2026
to
update
the
study
to
comply
with
eve
requirements
for
enforcement.
The
2026
Survey
was
prepared
using
the
guidelines
of
the
current
CA
MUTCD
and
adoption
of
the
Ordinance
(Attachment
A)
will
certify
speeds
throughout
the
City,
enable
our
Sheriffs
Deputies
to
use
radar
for
traffic
speed
enforcement
and
provide
the
legal
authority
for
court
requirements.
Attachment
A,
Exhibit
1 includes
the
proposed
2026
Survey
with
a reference
number
assigned
to
each
roadway
segment.
Out
of
55 segments,
10 segments
are
proposed
for
a
speed
limit
reduction.
Two
street
segments
are
recommended
to
adopt
the
recorded
85th
percentile
speed
rounded
to
its
nearest
increment
of
5 mph, resulting
in
a
speed
limit
that
is
5 mph
lower
than
the
existing
speed
limit.
Eight
street
segments
are
recommended
to
adopt
the
recorded
85th
percentile
speed
rounded
down
to
its
nearest
increment
of
5 mph,
resulting
in
a
speed
limit
that
is
5 or
10 mph
lower
than
the
existing
speed
limit.
Speed
Survey
Recommendations
Changes
to
Existing
85th
Existing
Speed
Percentile
Recommended
Speed
Segment
Limit
Speed
Speed
Limit
Limit
No.
Street
Segment
(mph)
(mph)
(mph)
(mph)
Camino
Westerly
City
1 Del
Norte
Limit
to
50 50
45 -5
Pomerado
Road
Danielson Street
I
Community
9 General
Road
to
35 34
30 -5
Atomics
Kirkham
Way
Way
Kirkham
Kirkham
Court
17 Road
to
Scripps
35 35
30 -5
Poway
Parkway
Kirkham
Scripps
Poway
18 Road/
Parkway
to
45a
42 40
-5
Kirkham
General
Atomics
Way
Way
Lake
Espola
Road
to
19 Poway
30 29
25 -5
Road
Park
Entrance
27 Oak
Knoll
Poway
Road
to
30 30
25 -5
Road
Pomerado
Road
Scripps
Westerly
City
Limit
to
41 Poway
Community
55 50
45 -10
Parkway
Road
2 of
12 September 15, 2026, Item #9
Changes
to
Existing
85th
Existing
Speed
Percentile
Recommended
Speed
Segment
Limit
Speed
Speed
Limit
Limit
No.
Street
Segment
(mph}
(mph}
(mph}
(mph}
Scripps
Community
Road
to
42 Poway
Danielson
55 53
50 -5
Parkway
Street
Stowe
Scripps
Poway
46 Drive
Parkway
to
35 32
30 -5
Kirkham
Way
Twin
Peaks
Community
53 Road
Road
to
Espola
45 45
40 -5
Road
a
Existing
posted
speed
limit
of
40 mph
from
Scripps
Poway
Parkway
to
Community
Road
does
not
match
2019
Survey
recommended
speed
limit
of
45 mph
-recommended
speed
limit
from
2019
Survey
of
45 mph
to
be
posted
consistent
with
the
previously completed
Survey.
All
the
remaining
segments
are
recommended
to
maintain
the
existing
and
previously
recommended
speed
limits.
Midland
Road
was
closely
evaluated
given
past
concerns
from
residents
in
the
community
. Speed
surveys
were
conducted
and
speed
data
collected
as
a
part
of
the
Survey
. Midland
Road
was
segmented
into
four
street
segments
for
data
collection
and
the
segments
were
determined
based
on
traffic
volume,
roadway
characteristics,
and
adjacent
land
use.
The
collected
data
supports
maintaining
the
current
speed
limits
. The
downtown
Midland
Road
area
adjacent
to
Old
Poway
Park
from
Aubrey
Street
to
Edgemoor
Street
will
continue
to
have
the
speed
limit
of
25 mph.
The
segments
north
and
south
of
this
section will
continue
to
have
a speed
limit
of
35 mph
, which
is
consistent
with
the
roadway
design
and
the
speed
limit
expected
for
the
roadway
classification.
At
its
meeting
on
July
1,
2026,
the
Traffic
Safety
Committee
(TSC),
which
includes
a representative
from
the
Sheriffs
Department,
voted
unanimously
to
support
staffs
recommendation
to
adopt
the
2026
Engineering and
Traffic
Survey.
There
were
no
residents
at
the
TSC
present
for
the
speed
survey
item.
Staff
did
not
receive
any
comments
regarding
the
speed
study
prior
to
or
after
the
TSC
meeting.
Environmental
Review:
This
item
is
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act
(CEQA),
pursuant
to
Section
15061
(b)(3)
of
the
CEQA
Guidelines
as
it
entails
adoption
of
an
Engineering
and
Traffic
Survey
and
establishing
speed
limits
on
several
road
segments,
and
there
is
no
possibility
that
this
will
have
a significant
effect
on
the
environment.
Fiscal
Impact:
There
are
sufficient
funds
available
in
the
adopted
Fiscal
Year
2026-27
Budget,
Citywide
Striping
3 of
12 September 15, 2026, Item #9
project
account
(ST034)
to
remove
and
install
the
speed
legend
changes
estimated
at
$30,000,
and
in
the
Sign
Maintenance
Materials
Account
(411040-45300)
to
replace
the
speed
limit
sign
changes
estimated
at
$3,370.
Funding
for
project
ST034
comes
from
the
City's
proportional
share
of
Statewide
Gas
Taxes
accumulated
in
City
Fund
2110
.
Public
Notification:
A
Notice
of
Public
Hearing
was
published
in
the
Poway
News
Chieftain
on
Thursday,
September
3,
2026. Attachments: A.
Ordinance
Adopting
the
2026
Engineering
and
Traffic
Survey
Tracy
Stevens
Assistant
City
Manager
4 of
12 Reviewed
By:
Alan
Fenstermacher
City
Attorney
Chris
Hazeltine
City
Manager
September 15, 2026, Item #9
ORDINANCE
NO.
AN
ORDINANCE
OF
THE
CITY
COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
POWAY
,
CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING
THE
2026
ENGINEERING
AND
TRAFFIC
SURVEY
WHEREAS,
Sections
22357
and
22358
of
the
California
Vehicle
Code
give
local
municipalities
the
authority
to
set
speed
limits
below
the
maximum
speed
limits
set
forth
by
State
law,
where
such
speed
limits
are
supported
by
an
Engineering
and
Traffic
Survey;
WHEREAS
, Section
627
of
the
California
Vehicle
Code
defines
the
Survey
requirements
deemed
necessary
by
the
State;
WHEREAS
, Section
2B.21
"Speed
Limit
Sign
(R2-1)"
of
the
California
Manual
on
Uniform
Traffic
Control
Devices
, dated
January
18,
2026,
defines
the
Survey
requirements
deemed
necessary
by
the
State;
WHEREAS,
Section
10 .32
.010
of
the
Poway Municipal
Code
allows
the
City
Council
to
determine
the
most
appropriate
speed
limits
on
certain
streets
within
the
City
Limits
based
on
an
Engineering
and
Traffic
Survey;
and
WHEREAS,
the
2026
Engineering
and
Traffic
Survey
, included
as
Exhibit
1,
has
been
prepared
in
accordance
with
Section
627
of
the
California
Vehicle
Code
and
Section
2B
.21
of
the
California
Manual
on
Uniform
Traffic
Control
Devices
to
set
speed
limits
in
the
City
of
Poway.
NOW,
THEREFORE
, THE
CITY
COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
POWAY
DOES
ORDAIN
AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION
1:
The
above
recitations
are
true
and
correct.
SECTION
2:
The
City
Council
finds
that
the
adoption
of
this
Ordinance
is
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act
(CEQA),
pursuant
to
Section
15061
(b)(3)
of
the
CEQA
Guidelines
, as
it
entails
adoption
of
an
Engineering
and
Traffic
Survey
and
establishing
speed
limits
on
several
road
segments
, and
there
is
no
possibility
that
this
will
have
a
significant
effect
on
the
environment.
SECTION
3:
The
2026
Engineering
and
Traffic
Survey
is
hereby
adopted
and
pursuant
to
California
Vehicle
Code
sect
ions
627,
22357
, 22358
and
22358
.8, the
City
Council
of
the
City
of
Poway
does
determine
and
declare
prima
facie
speed
limits
for
vehicles
as
specified
in
Exhibit
1 of
this
Ordinance
.
SECTION
4:
This
Ordinance
shall
be
codified.
EFFECTIVE
DA
TE
: This
Ordinance
shall
take
effect
and
be
in
force
thirty
(30)
days
after
its
adoption
.
CERTIFICATION/PUBLICATION:
The
City
Clerk
shall
certify
the
adoption
of
this
Ordinance
and
cause
it
or
a
summary
of
it,
to
be
published
with
the
names
of
the
City
Council
members
voting
for
and
against the
same
in
the
Poway
News
Chieftain
, a
newspaper
of
general
circulation
in
the
City
of
Poway
within
fifteen
(15)
days
after
its
adoption
and
shall
post
a
certified
5 of
12 ATTACHMENT
A
September 15, 2026, Item #9
Ordinance
No
.
Page
2 copy
of
this
Ordinance
in
the
Office
of
the
City
Clerk
in
accordance
with
Government
Code
§
36933
. INTRODUCED
AND
FIRST
READ
at
a
regular
meeting
of
the
City
Council
of
the
City
of
Poway,
California,
held
the
15th
day
of
September
2026,
and
thereafter
.
PASSED
AND
ADOPTED
at
a
regular
meeting
of
said
City
Council
held
the
6th
day
of
October
2026,
by
the
following
vote,
to
wit:
AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: DI
SQUALi
Fl
ED:
Steve
Vaus,
Mayor
ATTEST: Carrie
Gallagher,
CMC,
City
Clerk
6 of
12 September 15, 2026, Item #9
-..J
0 .... ....
N
No. Street Segment
Camino I Limit to
Del Norte Pomerado
Road
Carri;;ge
I
Oak Knoll Road
2 I Road to S!arridge
Park
Civic
I
Communir,
3 I Center Road to Poway
Drive rtoad
Twin Peaks
,I I Communit1 I Road to
Road Sycamore Tree
Lane
I Community Sycamore Tree
5 Lane to Metate Road Lane
6 I Community Mefate Lane to
Road Stowe Drive
I Community Stowe Drive to
7 Sc.~pps Poway Road Parkway
Community
I
Scripps Poway
8 I a d Parkway to
r.oa Kir~.ham Road
Danielson
Street/ Communiiy
9 I General Road to
Atomics Kirkham Way
wa-,
Del Espola Road to 10 I Pornente WE:slerly End ~oad
Emting
Speed
Umit
(mph)
50 30
25 45
35 45
45 35
35 35
I
.
.
50 34
30 48
45 .~ ,I
44 38
34 38
111-mph
Median Pace
Speed Range
("1111) (mph)
44 38 - 47
31 25 -34
26 22-31
44 40-49
41 36- 45
42 37 - 46
38 33 - 42
32 27 -36
29 25- 34
33 28 -37
Percent Cotrision
wf'm Rate
Pace (C/UVN)
o8% 0
84% 0.49
80% 0
76% 0.16
83¼ 0 .16
65% 0
65% 0
60% 0
75¼ 0.25
74% 0
sta1ewide
Avg.
3-Yr Col6sion
Rate (C/IMI)
(2022-2024)'
1.27 1. !5
1.15 1.27
1.27 1.27
1.27 1.27
1.15 1.15
--
45 30
25 45
35 45
45 35
30 35
Changes to
Existing
SpeedUmit
(mph)
-5
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 -5
0 Justification
§22358 6{a) - Round B5th
percentile :;peed: 50 - 5
§22358.G(c) -Lower by 5-mph if
initially rounded uo: 50 45
§22358.G(a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 34 - 35
§22358.G(c) -Lower by 5-mph if
1rntiall'l rounded up: 35 - 30
§22358.G{a) - Round B5th
percenble speed: 30 - 30
§22358. 6( c) -Lower by 5-mph 1f
initiallv rounded uo: 30 25
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th m percenble speed 48 - 50 X
§22358.G(c) -Lowtr by 5-mph if :::c
initiallv rounded uo: 50 45 Ill
§22358.8 -Retention of previously -I
adopted speed still considered ....
reasonable and s.afe.
§22358.6(a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 47 45
§22358.G{a) - Round B5th
percenble speed: 44 - 45
§22358.6(a) - Round B5th
percentile speed· 38- 40
§22358.6(c) • Lower by 5-mph if
initiall•t rounded uo: 40 35
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 34 - 35
§22358.6(c) -Lower by 5-mph if
initially rounded up· 35 - 30
0 §22358.G{a)- Round 85th ...
0..
percentile speed: 38- 40 ::J
§22358.6(c) -Lower by 5-mph if Q)
initially rounded up: 40 - 35 "'U ::J
m n co CD
CD Z
w!='
September 15, 2026, Item #9
00 0 .... .....
N
No. Street Segment
Espola
I "~-•~"] V"f
11 I Road Limli to
,... . ~ _J ~ ~.:..,..,,
12 I Espola Cloudcroft Drive
Road to Titan Way
Espola 13 I Titan Wa, to
Road Poway Road
Poway Road to Garden 14 I Road Sycamore
Valley Road
15 I High Valley I Espola Road to
Road Easterly End
Hillear1
I
Midland Road
16 I Place to Community
Road
Kirkham
I
Kirkham Court
17 I Road to Scripps
Poway Parkway
Kirkham Sciipps Paway
1s I Road/ Parkwa, io
Kirkham General
Wav Atomics Wav
Lake Espola Road to 19 I Poway Park Entrance Road
Lake Espola Road to 20 I Poway
Road Westerly End
21 I Martincoit Espola Road to
Orchard Gate Road Road
I
Existing
Speed
Umit
(mph)
45 45
45 35
25 (WB:,,
30(EB)
35 35
45='
30 35
.}5
I
.
I 49
51 47
37 38
36 35
42 29
43 37
I
Median
Speed
(mflll)
45 47
43 33
34 33
30 34
26 35
32 10,mph
Pace
Range
(mph)
1 40-49
43 • 52
39 • 48
28 • 37
30 - 39
29 • 38
26 • 35
30 - 39
21- 30
29 • 38
28 • 37
I
Percent
wfln
Pace
83%
88%
85'}~
90%
76%
88%
77%
68'}~
76%
60%
80%
I
Collision
Rate
(C/MVM)
0.06 0.07
0.3 0.66
1.14 0
1.16 0.21
t 44
0 0
I
II
.
.
.
.
1.27 1.27
1.15 1.15
1. 15
115
1.27 1.27
115
115
1.15 I
Speed limit
(mph)
45 45
45 35
30 35
30 40
25 35
35 I
Changes to
Existing
Speed limit
(mph)
0 0
0 0
0 0
.5
.5
.5
0 0
I
Justification
§22358.G{a) • Round 85th
percenblf: speed: 49 - 50
§22358.6(c) - lower by 5-mph rf
initiall•r rounded up: 50 - 45
§22358.8 - Retention of previously
adopted speed still considered
reasonable and s.afe.
§22358.G(a) • Round 851h
percenhle speed: 4 7 45
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 37 - 35
§22358.8 • Retention of previously
adopted speed still considerEd
reasonable and safe.
§22358 6{ a) • Round 851h
percenble speed: 36 - 35
§22356.G{a) • Round 85th
percentile speed: 35 - 35
§22358.6(c) • Lower by 5-mph if
initially rounded up: 35 - 30
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 42 - 40
§22358.G{a) • Round 85th
percentil& speed: 29 - 30
§22358.6(c) • Lower by 5-mph if
initiallv rounded uo: 30 25
§22358.8 - Retention of previously
adopted speed still considered
reasonable and safe. 0 .....
§22358.6{a) • Round 85th 0.
S" percenble speed: 37 - 35 Q)
"'O ::l
Q) 0
CO CD
(D z
..i:,. ~
September 15, 2026, Item #9
\0
0 .....
-"
N
No. Street Segment
Metal<:
I R~~d--;~•1 I 22 I Lane Herencia Drive
Midland
I
l '.'lin Peaks I
23 I Road Road to f.,u'orey
Stret:t
Midland
I
Aubrey Street
I
24 I Road to Edgemoor
Street
Midland
I
Edgem00<
I
25 I Road Street to
Cynthia Lane
26 I Mltlland ·1 Crih ra lane to I
Road rarrc;ate Dnve
Oak Knoll
I
Poway Road to I
27 I Road Pomerado
Road
Oak Knoll I Pomer~do I 28 I R d Road ,o oa C . arnage rload 29 I Old Coach I Espola Read to I
rlcad Northerly End
Old I Pomerado to 30 I Pomerado Southerly End Road
Bernardo
Heights
31 I Pomerado I Parkway to Road Twin Peaks
Road
Existing
Speed
Umit
(mph)
35 35
25 35
35 30
25 35
30 45
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
. .
38 38
29 39
41 30
29 41
34 50
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lledian
Speed
(qih)
33 34
25 16
3-6
25 24
35 31
45 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1o.tr.,h
Pace
Range
(mph)
29-38
30- 39
I
I
20 - 29 I
31- 40 I
33 - 42
I
19 - 28
I
22 - 31
I
30 - 39 I
25-34
39-48
Percent Collision
wfin Rate
Pace (cnMI)
56%
I
0 85%
I
0.47 84%
I
0 90%
I
0 21
89%
I 0.44
71%
I
037
68%
I
1.65 77%
I
0 82% 0
70% 0
II
.
.
I
1.15 I
1.15 I
1.15 I
1.15 I 1.27
I
1.15 I
1.15 I
1.15 1. 15
1.27 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SpeedUmit
(mph)
35 35
25 35
35 25
25 35
30 45
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Changes to
Existing
SpeedUmit
(mph)
0 0
0 0
0 -5
0 0
0 0
Justification
§22358.6(a) - Round 85th
I
percentile speed: 38 - 40
§22358.6(c) - Lower by ~mph If
initiall•l rounded ue: 40 - 35
I
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 38 - 40
§22358.6(c) - Lo'ller by ~mph if
initiall•r rounded ue: 40 - 35
I
§22358 6(a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 29 - 30
§22358.6(c) - Lower by ~mph if
initially rounded ue: 30 - 25
I
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 39 - 40
§22358.6(c) - Lower by ~mph if
initiall·l rounded ue: AO - 35
I
§22358.8 - Retention of previousJy
ad~ted speed still considered
reasonable and safe.
I
§223"58 6{a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 30 - 30
§22358.6(c) - Lower 'er/ ~mph If
mitialli rounded ue: 30 - 25
I
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
percenble :;peed. 29 - 30
§22358.6(c) - Lower by ~mph if
initiall11 rounded up: 30 - 25
I
§22358.8 - Retention of previousJy
ad~ ted speed still considered
reasonable and safe.
§22358.6(a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 34 - 35
§22358.&(c) - Lower by ~mph if
initiallv rounded up: 35 30
0 §22358.G{a) - Round 85th .... c_
percenble speed: 50 - 50 :::J
§22358.6(c) - Lower by >mph if m
initially rounded up: 50 - 45 "U :::J
mo
CO CD
(D z
c.n ~
September 15, 2026, Item #9
.....
0 0 .... .....
N
No. Street Segment
32 I Pomerado I Road to Ted
Road Williams
33 I Pomerado I Ted '/\~!Iiams
Parkway to Road Metate Lane
I
Me1ate Lane lo
34 I Pon1E-rado S 1h c·11t R d ou em 1 ,
oa Limit
Pcmay
I
Westerly City
35 I Road Limit 1o Oa~.
Knoll Road
Po-J1a1
I
Oak Knoll Road
36 I Road to Ann O Reno
Lane
Pcmay
I
.Lnn O Reno
37 I Road Lane 1o Garden
Road
I
Garden rload to
38 I Poway Silver Kidge Road Road
Po11a1
I
Silver Ridge
39 I rload Road to Espola
Road
Existing
Speed
Umit
(mph)
I
40(NB) I
45(S8)'
45 45
45 35
35 50
50 Poway
I
Espola Road to I 40 I Road SR-67 50
Westerly Cit, Scripps
I
Limit to 41 I Ponay 55 Community Parkway Road
Community Scripps
I
42 I Poway Road lo 55 Danielson Parkway Street
I
.
.
36 I
50 46
44 41
39 51
52 I 54 I
50 53
Med"san
Speed
(mph)
30 44
40 40
37 36
47 47
<19
,-, '+v
49 I
I
10,mph
Pace
Range
(mph)
24-33
40-49
35 - 44
35- 44
33- 42
32 - 41
42- 51
44- 53
45 - 54
38 - 47
45-54
Percent Collision
wfin Rate
Pace (C/MVM)
I 63%
I 0.23
I
74% 0.07
70% 0.05
71 % 0.05
88% 0.37
95% 0
75% 0
90% 0.09
I 81% I 0.14 I
65% 0.1
78% 0.09
•
.
.
' .
1.27 1.27
1.27 1.27
1.27 1.27
1. 15
1.15 1.27
1.27 1.27
R
I
I
SpeedUmlt
(mph)
40 45
45 45
35 35
50 50
50 45
50 I
I
Changes to
Existing
SpeedUmit
(mph)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 -10
-5
Justification
I
§22358.8 -RetenLion of previously
adopted speed still considered
reasonable and safe.
§22358.6{a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 50 - 50
§22358.o(c) - Lower by 5-mph if
initiall•t rounded uo: 50 45
§22358.6{a) - Round 85th
pei'centile speed: 46 - 45
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 44 - <15
§22358.8 - Retention cf previously
adopted spi::ed still considered
reasonable and safe.
§22358 6{a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 39 - 40
§22358.G(c) - l ower by 5-mph if
rnitiall•t rounded UP. 40 35
§22358.6{a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 51- 50
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 52- 50
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
I
pe.centile speed: 54 - 55
§22358.6(c) - Lower by 5-mph if
initiall•t rounded up: 55 - 50
§22358.G{a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 50 - 50
§22358.&(c) - Lower by 5-mph if
initiall11 rounded uo: 50 45 0 ....
§2235B.6{a) - Round 85th c_
pacentile speed: 53 - 55 ::::,
Q)
§22358.6(c) - Lower by 5-mph if "1J ::::,
initially rounded up: 55 - 50 Q) (1
CC CD
CD Z
0) 9
September 15, 2026, Item #9
.... ....
0 .... ....
N
No.
43 I
44 I
45 I
46 I
• 47 I
48 I
49 I
50 I
51 I
52 I
Street
Scripps
Poway
Parkway
Stone
Can'fOn
Road
Stowe
Drive
Stowe
Drive
Sycamore
Canyon
Road
Tech
Center/
Parkway
Center
Drwe
Ted
'l\'illiams
Parkway
Ted
'Nilliams
Parkwa•t
Tierra
Bonita
Road
Tv,1n
Pea~.s
Road
Segment
I
........... ._._...,, ,
Street to
Easteri, City
l imit
I
Westerly City
l imit1o
Martmcoit Road
I
Pom"::rado
Road to Scripps
Poway Parkway
I
Suipps Pr:may
Parkway to
Kirkham Wav
Garden Road to
Easter!:,: City
Limit
I
Stowe Drive to I
Kirkham Way
Westerly City
Limit to
Pomerado
Road
Pornerado
Road to T v.in
Peaks Road
Twin Peaks
Road to Ipava
Drive
Pomerado
Road to
Community
Road
Existing
Speed
Umit
(mph)
60 35
45 35
40 3-0'
50 45
35 45
I
I
.
.
.
69 40
47 32
45 29
55 45
42 48
I
Median
Speed
(qih)
63 35
42 29
40 24
51 39
38 43
I
1G-mph
Pace
Range
<•>
59 - 68
31-40
36 - 45
24 -33
35 - 44
t7 -26
46 - 55
34 - 43
32 - 41
39 - 48
I
Percent Collision
wfin Rate
Pace (CIMVM)
62% 0.06
83 0,
/ 0 0
70% 0.09
84% 0.74
70% 1.90
75%
I
0 85% 0.18
63% 0.66
74% 0
65~~ 0.09
•
.
.
.
.
1.27 1.15
1.27 1.27
1.15 I
115
I
1.27 1.27
1.15 1.27
R
SpeedUmit
(mph)
60 35
45 30
40 30
50 45
35 45
I
Changes to
Existing
SpeedUmit
(mph)
0 0
0 -5
0 0
0 0
0 0
I
Justification
§22358.8 - Retention of previousl,
adopted speed still considered
reasonable and safe.
§22358.6(a) - Round 85th
pHcentile speed: 40 - 40
§22358.&(c) - lower by 5-mph if
initiall•t rounded up: 40 35
§22358.S(a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 47 - 45
§22358.6(a) - Round 85th
perC€ntile speed: 32 - 30
§22358.G{a) - Rc,und 85th
percentile speed: 45 - 45
§22358.&(c) - lower by 5-mph if
initial!•/ rounded up: 45 40
§22358.o{a) - Round 85th
percenble speed: 29 - 30
§22358.S{a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 55 - 55
§22358.6(c) -lower by 5-mph if
initially rounded uo: 55 50
§22358.6{a) - Round 85th
percentile speed: 45 - 45
§22358.8 -Retention of previously
adopted spe.,d still con$idered
reasonable and s;;fe.
§22358.G(a) - Round 85th 0 ....
pe1centile speed: 48 - 50 a.
§22358.&(c) -lower by 5-mph 1f ::::,
Q)
initiall•t rounded up: 50 - 45 ""O::::,
!l) 0
ca CD
CD Z
--..J ~
September 15, 2026, Item #9
~
N
0 ....
~
N
No. Street Segment
Twin Gomm,;nity
53 P1:aks Road to bpola
rtoad 'ioad
54 1/alle Espola Road to 1/erce
Road Decant Drive
1/alle Dee?.nt Drive to
55 1/erce Old Winery
Road Road
Existing
Speed
Umit
(mph)
45 35
30 I
.
.
4"
40 39
Med"san
Speed
(mph)
,:o
3o
35 10-mph
Pace
Range
(mph)
37 • 46
31-40
30 -39
• Based on the 2023 Caltrans Crash Data on California State Highways pg. 8 Percent Collision
wfin Rate
Pace (CIMVM)
II
.
'
I
59% 0.08 1.27
86% 0.29 1.15
85% 0 115
R
SpeedUmit
(mph)
40 35
30 Changes to
Existing
SpeedUmit
(mph)
-5
0 0
Justification
§22358 6{a) • Round B5th
percenble :-,peed: 45 - l5
§22358.o(c) • Lower by 5-mph If
initiall•t rounded up 45 - 40
§22358.€,{a) • Round 85th
pErcentile speed: 40 - .:o
§22358.o(c) • Lo"t1€r by 5-mph If
initiallv rounded up. 40 - 35
§22358.8 • Retention of previously
adopted speed still considered
reasonable and safe.
, Existing posted speed limit of 25 mph in WB direction does not match 2019 E& TS recommended speed limit of 30 mph - recommended speed limit from 20 19 E& TS of 30 mpt1 to be used as existing speed limit due to that tJeing t11e previously completed E& TS. 0 Existing posted speed I11rnt of 40 mph from Scripps Poway Parkway to Community Road does not matcI1 2019 E&TS recommended speed limit of 45 mph - recommended speecJ lImIt from 2019 E&TS of 45 mph to IJe used as existing speed !unit due to tllat being tile previously completed E&TS. ' ExIstIng posted speed limit of 45 mpt1 In SB direction does not match 20 19 E& TS recommended speed limit of 40 mpt1 - recommended speed liI111t from 2019 E& TS or 40 mph to tJe used as existing speed limit due to that being tt1e previously completed E& TS. d 30 mph was noted as tile speed limit In the 20 19 E& TS !Jut no speed limit sign was documented during tile field review. 0 a. s·
Q)
"O :J
Q) 0
co CD
CD Z
CX>9