ID No Project Information and Cost
Intersections
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
209 Rio del Oro Parkway / Sunrise Boulevard
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 6x6 Tee-F 1 LS $1,932,435.85 $1,932,436 Adjust for existing improvements and construction -$163,693 under traffic and sliver widening
Subtotal $1,768,743
Contingency 15% $265,311
Engineering and Permits 35% $619,060
Right of Way (Agricultural) 11700 SF $2.60 $30,420
Total $2,683,534
Rounded $2,684,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,684,000
210 Rio del Oro Parkway / Rancho Cordova Parkway
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 6x6-F 1 LS $2,599,504.28 $2,599,504
Subtotal $2,599,504
Contingency 15% $389,926
Engineering and Permits 35% $909,826
Total $3,899,256
Rounded $3,899,000
Other Funding $0
Right of Way Agricultural
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $3,899,000
211 Rio del Oro Parkway / Centennial Drive
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4-F 1 LS $1,904,175.27 $1,904,175
Subtotal $1,904,175
Contingency 15% $285,626
Engineering and Permits 35% $666,461
Total $2,856,263
Rounded $2,856,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,856,000
212 Rio del Oro Parkway / Americanos Boulevard
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4x4-F 1 LS $1,904,175.27 $1,904,175
Subtotal $1,904,175
Contingency 15% $285,626
Engineering and Permits 35% $666,461
Total $2,856,263
Rounded $2,856,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,856,000
New Intersection
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
213 Rio del Oro Parkway / White Rock Road
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x6 Tee-F 1 LS $1,616,861.07 $1,616,861 Adjust for existing improvements and construction under traffic and sliver widening $107,278 Subtotal $1,724,139
Contingency 15% $258,621
Engineering and Permits 35% $603,449
Total $2,586,209
Rounded $2,586,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,586,000
215 Rio del Oro Parkway / Easton Valley Parkway
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4x6 Tee-F 1 LS $1,616,861.07 $1,616,861
Subtotal $1,616,861
Contingency 15% $242,529
Engineering and Permits 35% $565,901
Total $2,425,292
Rounded $2,425,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,425,000
In the New Annexation Area
New Intersection
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
216 Rio del Oro Parkway / Folsom Boulevard
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4x4 Tee-F 0.33 LS $1,446,727.57 $477,420
Subtotal $477,420
Contingency 15% $71,613
Engineering and Permits 35% $167,097
Total $716,130
Rounded $716,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $716,000
217 Villagio Drive / Douglas Road
Existing Condition: Two legs of Tee Intersection Built
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
North Leg of Intersection 4x4 Tee-F 0.3 LS $1,446,727.57 $434,018 Remaining cost of traffic signal 2 LS $120,500.00 $241,000 Subtotal $675,018
Contingency 15% $101,253
Engineering and Permits 35% $236,256
Total $1,012,527
Rounded $1,013,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,013,000
In the New Annexation Area
Credit for improvements on Douglas Rd intersection legs included in Project #56 New Intersection
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
218 Villagio Drive / Rancho Cordova Parkway
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x6-F 1 LS $2,211,418.54 $2,211,419
Subtotal $2,211,419
Contingency 15% $331,713
Engineering and Permits 35% $773,996
Total $3,317,128
Rounded $3,317,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $3,317,000
219 Villagio Drive / Centennial Drive
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4-F Yes 1 LS $1,904,175.27 $1,904,175 Subtotal $1,904,175
Contingency 15% $285,626
Engineering and Permits 35% $666,461
Total $2,856,263
Rounded $2,856,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,856,000
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
220 Villagio Drive / Americanos Boulevard
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4-F 1 LS $1,904,175.27 $1,904,175
Subtotal $1,904,175
Contingency 15% $285,626
Engineering and Permits 35% $666,461
Total $2,856,263
Rounded $2,856,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,856,000
221 Villagio Drive / White Rock Road
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x6-F 1 LS $2,211,418.54 $2,211,419
Subtotal $2,211,419
Contingency 15% $331,713
Engineering and Permits 35% $773,996
Total $3,317,128
Rounded $3,317,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $3,317,000
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
226 Easton Valley Parkway / Rancho Cordova Parkway
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 6x6-F 1 LS $2,599,504.28 $2,599,504
Subtotal $2,599,504
Contingency 25% $649,876
Engineering and Permits 35% $909,826
Total $4,159,207
Rounded $4,159,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $4,159,000
227 Easton Valley Parkway / Hazel Avenue
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 6x6-F 1 LS $2,599,504.28 $2,599,504
Subtotal $2,599,504
Contingency 25% $649,876
Engineering and Permits 35% $909,826
Total $4,159,207
Rounded $4,159,000
Other Funding $0
County Portion 50% $2,079,500
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,080,000
COUNTY SHARED PROJECT
In the New Annexation Area
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
230.2 Centennial Drive / International Boulevard
Existing Condition: Undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4 Tee-F 1 LS $1,446,727.57 $1,446,728 Subtotal $1,446,728
Contingency 15% $217,009
Engineering and Permits 35% $506,355
Total $2,170,091
Rounded $2,170,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,170,000
230.3 Centennial Drive / Americanos Boulevard
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4 Tee-F 1 LS $1,446,727.57 $1,446,728 Subtotal $1,446,728
Contingency 15% $217,009
Engineering and Permits 35% $506,355
Total $2,170,091
Rounded $2,170,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,170,000
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
231 Americanos Boulevard / Kiefer Boulevard
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4 Tee-F 1 LS $1,446,727.57 $1,446,728 Subtotal $1,446,728
Contingency 15% $217,009
Engineering and Permits 35% $506,355
Total $2,170,091
Rounded $2,170,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,170,000
231.1 Americanos Boulevard / North Campus Drive
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4 Tee-F 1 LS $1,446,727.57 $1,446,728 Subtotal $1,446,728
Contingency 15% $217,009
Engineering and Permits 35% $506,355
Total $2,170,091
Rounded $2,170,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,170,000
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
232 Americanos Boulevard / Chrysanthy Boulevard
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4-F 1 LS $1,904,175.27 $1,904,175
Subtotal $1,904,175
Contingency 15% $285,626
Engineering and Permits 35% $666,461
Total $2,856,263
Rounded $2,856,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,856,000
233 Americanos Boulevard / Douglas Road
Existing Condition: Partially built
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4-F 1 LS $1,904,175.27 $1,904,175
Adjust for existing improvements and construction -$107,278 under traffic and sliver widening
Subtotal $1,796,897
Contingency 15% $269,535
Engineering and Permits 35% $628,914
Total $2,695,346
Rounded $2,695,000
Credit Agreement $1,185,138
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,509,862
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
234 Americanos Boulevard / International Drive
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4 Tee-F 1 LS $1,446,727.57 $1,446,728 Subtotal $1,446,728
Contingency 15% $217,009
Engineering and Permits 35% $506,355
Total $2,170,091
Rounded $2,170,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,170,000
245 Chrysanthy Boulevard / Sunrise Boulevard
Existing Condition: Built
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x6-F 0 LS $2,211,418.54 $0
Subtotal $0
Contingency 15% $0
Engineering and Permits 35% $0
Total $2,615,882
Rounded $2,616,000
Credit Agreement $2,260,313
Other Funding $355,569
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $0.00
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
246 Chrysanthy Boulevard / Rancho Cordova Parkway
Existing Condition: Partially built
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4-F 1 LS $1,904,175.27 $1,904,175
Adjust for existing improvements and construction $186,600 under traffic and sliver widening
Subtotal $2,090,775
Contingency 15% $313,616
Engineering and Permits 35% $731,771
Total $3,136,163
Rounded $3,136,000
Credit Agreement $724,740
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,411,260
247 Chrysanthy Boulevard / Grant Line Road
Existing Condition: undeveloped
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x6-F 1 LS $2,211,418.54 $2,211,419
Adjust for existing improvements and construction under traffic and sliver widening -$3,696 Subtotal $2,207,723
Contingency 15% $331,158
Engineering and Permits 35% $772,703
Total $3,311,584
Rounded $3,312,000
Other Funding $993,600
County Portion 50% $1,159,200
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,159,200
COUNTY SHARED PROJECT
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
253 Douglas Road / Sunrise Boulevard
Existing Condition: Partially built
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 6x6-F 1 LS $2,599,504.28 $2,599,504
Subtotal $2,599,504
Contingency 25% $649,876
Engineering and Permits 35% $909,826
Total $4,159,207
Rounded $4,159,000
Credit Agreement $2,743,042
Other Funding $290,890
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,125,069
254 Douglas Road / Rancho Cordova Parkway
Existing Condition: Partially built
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Construct North Leg of Intersection 4x6-F 0.25 LS $2,211,418.54 $552,855 Frontage on north side of intersection 4x6-D 0.5 LS $1,704,978.13 $852,489 Subtotal $1,405,344
Contingency 15% $210,802
Engineering and Permits 35% $491,870
Total $4,869,467
Rounded $4,869,000
Credit Agreement $2,761,451
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,107,549
Total Cost includes Credit agreement
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
255 Douglas Road / Grant Line Road
Existing Condition: Partially built
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4x6-F 1 LS $2,211,418.54 $2,211,419
Adjust for existing improvements and construction under traffic and sliver widening -$42,000 Subtotal $2,169,419
Contingency 15% $325,413
Engineering and Permits 35% $759,296
$774,011
Total $4,028,139
Rounded $4,028,000
Other Funding $1,678,597
County Portion 50% $1,174,702
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,174,702
265 Femoyer St. / International (Peter McQuen)
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x6 Tee-F 0 LS $1,616,861.07 $0
Subtotal $0
Contingency 15% $0
Engineering and Permits 35% $0
Total $644,433
Rounded $644,000
City Project $184,309
Other Funding $460,124
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $183,876
City Project already built
Modify Intersection
COUNTY SHARED PROJECT
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
267.25 LRT Grade Separation @ Bradshaw Road
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Bradshaw Rd LRT Grade Separation 1 LS $25,000,000 $25,000,000 Subtotal $25,000,000
Total $25,000,000
County Portion 50.0% $12,500,000
Other funding $6,250,000
FEE PORTION: 25.0% $6,250,000
267.45 LRT Grade Separation @ Mather Field Road
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Mather Field Rd LRT Grade Separation 1 LS $27,000,000 $27,000,000 Subtotal $27,000,000
Total $27,000,000
Other funding $13,500,000
FEE PORTION: 50.0% $13,500,000
267.65 LRT Grade Separation @ Zinfandel Drive
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Zinfandel Dr LRT Grade Separation 1 LS $26,000,000 $26,000,000 Subtotal $26,000,000
Total $26,000,000
Other funding $13,000,000
FEE PORTION: 50.0% $13,000,000
25.0% NEW DEVELOPMENT SHARE, 25.0% CITY OBLIGATION
50.0% NEW DEVELOPMENT SHARE, 50.0% CITY OBLIGATION
COUNTY SHARED PROJECT
50.0% NEW DEVELOPMENT SHARE, 50.0% CITY OBLIGATION
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
269 Folsom Boulevard / Hazel Avenue
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4x6-F 0 LS $2,211,418.54 $0
Subtotal $0
Contingency 25% $0
Engineering and Permits 35% $0
Right of Way 0 SF $90.00 $0
Total $0
Rounded $0
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $0
273 Grant Line Road / Jackson Hwy.
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Modify Intersection 6x6-F 1 LS $2,599,504.28 $2,599,504 Subtotal $2,599,504
Contingency 25% $649,876
Engineering and Permits 35% $909,826
Total $4,159,207
Rounded $4,159,000
Other Funding $1,247,700
County Portion 75% $2,183,475
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $727,825
R/W
Urban Interchange
Project Included in Interchange
COUNTY SHARED PROJECT
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
274 Grant Line Road / Rancho Cordova Parkway
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 6x4 Tee-F 1 LS $1,724,690.54 $1,724,691 Adjust for existing improvements and construction $26,603 under traffic and sliver widening
Subtotal $1,751,294
Contingency 15% $262,694
Engineering and Permits 35% $612,953
Total $2,626,940
Rounded $2,627,000
Other Funding $788,100
County Portion 33% $612,354
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,226,546
275 Grant Line Road / Kiefer Boulevard
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Modify Intersection 6x4 Tee-F 1 LS $1,724,690.54 $1,724,691 Adjust for existing improvements and construction under traffic and sliver widening $22,701 Subtotal $1,747,392
Contingency 15% $262,109
Engineering and Permits 35% $611,587
Right of Way (Industrial) 22000 SF $55.00 $1,210,000
Total $3,831,087
Rounded $3,831,000
Other Funding $1,149,300
County Portion 50% $1,340,850
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,340,850
Right of Way Industrial
COUNTY SHARED PROJECT
COUNTY SHARED PROJECT
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
278.1 Old Placerville Road / Mather Boulevard / Peter McCuen Boulevard Old Placerville (International) – 6 lanes from west direction Old Placerville – 4 lanes to north direction
Peter McCuen extension (International) – 4 lanes to east direction Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x4x4x6-F 1 LS $2,105,081.98 $2,105,082 Adjust for existing improvements and construction -$277,099 under traffic and sliver widening
Subtotal $1,827,983
Contingency 15% $274,197
Engineering and Permits 35% $639,794
Right of Way (Commercial) 112500 SF $105.00 $11,812,500 Total $14,554,474
Rounded $14,554,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $14,554,000
279.1 Mather Boulevard / Whitehead Street & Von Karman Street Couplet Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Modify Intersection 4x4-F 1 LS $1,904,175.27 $1,904,175 Adjust for existing improvements and construction under traffic and sliver widening -$515,193 Subtotal $1,388,982
Contingency 15% $208,347
Engineering and Permits 35% $486,144
Right of Way (Industrial) 53100 SF $55.00 $2,920,500
Total $5,003,973
Rounded $5,004,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $5,004,000
Right of Way Commercial
Right of Way Industrial
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
279.2 Mather Boulevard / Femoyer Road
Existing Conditions: North, south and west legs at ultimate width Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Widening of east leg of intersection 4x4-F 0.25 LS $1,904,175.27 $476,044 Remaining cost of new traffic signal 3 LS $120,500.00 $361,500 Subtotal $837,544
Contingency 15% $125,632
Engineering and Permits 35% $293,140
Right of Way (Industrial) 28800 SF $55.00 $1,584,000
Total $2,840,316
Rounded $2,840,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,840,000
279.4 Mather Boulevard / North Mather Boulevard
Existing Conditions: two lanes on each leg
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Widen intersection 4x4 Tee-F 1 LS $1,446,727.57 $1,446,728 Subtotal $1,446,728
Contingency 15% $217,009
Engineering and Permits 35% $506,355
Right of Way (Industrial) 5000 SF $55.00 $275,000
Total $2,445,091
Rounded $2,445,000
City Project $336,657
Other Funding $153,624
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,954,720
Right of Way (East leg only)
Right of Way
Assumes Mather Boulevard narrowed to two lanes east of intersection Widening needed on east leg of intersection
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
280.1 Peter A McCuen Boulevard / Femoyer Street
Existing Conditions: South leg improved to ultimate
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4x4 Tee-F 0.67 LS $1,446,727.57 $969,307
Remaining cost of traffic signal 1 Leg $120,500.00 $120,500 Subtotal $1,089,807
Contingency 15% $163,471
Engineering and Permits 35% $381,433
Acquisition of Row Industrial Right of Way (Industrial) 28800 SF $55.00 $1,584,000 Total $3,218,711
Rounded $3,219,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $3,219,000
281 International Dr. / Zinfandel Dr.
Ultimate Buildout: 6 x 6 Intersection
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
6x6 Intersection 6x6-F 0 LS $2,599,504.28 $0
Subtotal $0
Contingency 15% $0
Engineering and Permits 35% $0
Total $232,985
Rounded $233,000
Credit Agreement $232,985
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $0
Widening of north and west legs
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
282 International Drive / Kilgore Road
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4 x 6 Intersection 4x6-F 0 LS $2,211,418.54 $0
Subtotal $0
Contingency 15% $0
Engineering and Permits 35% $0
Total $0
Rounded $0
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $0
283 International Drive / Sunrise Boulevard
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 6x6-F 0 LS $2,599,504.28 $0
Intersection 6x6 I-Dev less pole relocation 6x6-D 0 LS $1,787,896.09 $0 Subtotal $0
Contingency 15% $0
Engineering and Permits 35% $0
Acquisition of Row Residential Right of Way (Residential) $40.00 $0 Total $0
Rounded $0
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $0
Project Construction Cost included in Project 110
Project Construction Cost included in Project 110
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
284 International Drive / Rancho Cordova Parkway
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 6x6-F 1 LS $2,599,504.28 $2,599,504
Subtotal $2,599,504
Contingency 15% $389,926
Engineering and Permits 35% $909,826
Total $3,899,256
Rounded $3,899,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $3,899,000
284.1 International Drive at White Rock
International – 4 lane on south side
White Rock – 6 lanes through
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
New Intersection 4x6 Tee-F 1 LS $1,616,861.07 $1,616,861 Adjust for existing improvements and construction under traffic and sliver widening $88,904 Subtotal $1,705,765
Contingency 15% $255,865
Engineering and Permits 35% $597,018
Total $2,558,648
Rounded $2,559,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,559,000
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
288 Jackson Highway / Sunrise Boulevard
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Intersection (6x6) 6x6-F 1 LS $2,599,504.28 $2,599,504
Laguna Creek Bridge (6 lane; full cost) Bridge/Culvert 0 SF $295.00 $0 Bridge: Jackson Highway (east leg) Bridge/Culvert 4410 SF $295.00 $1,300,950 Subtotal $3,900,454
Contingency 25% $975,114
Environmental 15.0% $585,068
Engineering and Permits 35% $1,365,159
Total $6,825,795
Rounded $6,826,000
Other Funding $0
County Portion 75% $5,119,500
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,707,000
289 Rancho Cordova Parkway / Kiefer Boulevard
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4x4 Ultimate, Phase 1 2x2 4x4-F 1 LS $1,904,175.27 $1,904,175 Subtotal $1,904,175
Contingency 15% $285,626
Engineering and Permits 35% $666,461
Total $2,856,263
Rounded $2,856,000
Credit Agreement $631,338
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,224,662
COUNTY SHARED PROJECT
Jackson/FSC bridge is full County cost at a later time
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
289.1 Rancho Cordova Parkway / North Campus Drive
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4x4 Tee 4x4 Tee-F 1 LS $1,446,727.57 $1,446,728
Subtotal $1,446,728
Contingency 15% $217,009
Engineering and Permits 35% $506,355
Total $2,170,091
Rounded $2,170,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,170,000
290 Rancho Cordova Parkway / White Rock Road
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
6x6 Intersection 6x6-F 1 LS $2,250,000.00 $2,250,000
Subtotal $2,250,000
Contingency 25% $562,500
Engineering and Permits 35% $787,500
Total $3,600,000
Rounded $3,600,000
Other Funding $1,807,912
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,792,088
"Other funding" for Projects 195, 196 and 290 proportionally split based on total cost estimate Reflects detailed cost estimate prepared separately
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
294 Kiefer Boulevard / Sunrise Boulevard
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4 x 6 Intersection 4x6-F 1 LS $2,211,418.54 $2,211,419
Adjust for existing improvements and construction $107,278 under traffic and sliver widening
Subtotal $2,318,697
Contingency 15% $347,804
Engineering and Permits 35% $811,544
Acquisition of Row Agricultural Right of Way (Agricultural) 134100 SF $2.60 $348,660 Total $3,826,705
Rounded $3,827,000
Credit Agreement $1,175,916
Other Funding $495,840
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $2,155,244
295 Mather Field Road / Rockingham Road
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
4 x 6 Intersection 4x6-F 1 LS $2,211,418.54 $2,211,419
Adjust for existing improvements and construction -$1,084,494 under traffic and sliver widening
Subtotal $1,126,925
Contingency 15% $169,039
Engineering and Permits 35% $394,424
Total $1,690,387
Rounded $1,690,000
Other Funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,690,000
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
299 Sunrise Boulevard / White Rock Road
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Widen Intersection 6x6-F 1 LS $2,599,504.28 $2,599,504
Subtotal $2,599,504
Contingency 25% $649,876
Engineering and Permits 35% $909,826
Acquisition of ROW Right of Way 12000 SF $90 $1,080,000 Total $5,239,207
Rounded $5,239,000
FEE PORTION 25% $1,309,750
Other Funding $3,929,250
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $1,309,750
Fee Portion based on widening west leg only
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
Transit, Bike & ITS Projects
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
304 City Transit System
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Sunrise/Citrus Road Transit Corridor - Sunrise Station to River 9000 LF $850 $7,650,000 Transit Stations in Roadway Medians 15 EA $500,000 $7,500,000 Mobility Hubs/Regional Transit Centers 3 EA $4,000,000 $12,000,000 Transit Maintenance Facility 1 EA $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Bus Shuttle Vehicles/ Autonomous Vehicles 26 EA $800,000 $20,800,000 ITS (Changeable message signs, DSRC, signal priority) 1 LS $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Enhanced Bus Stops (includes lighting, benches, shelters, etc.) 96 EA $10,000 $960,000 Subtotal $59,910,000
Contingency 15% $8,986,500
Engineering and Permits 35% $20,968,500
Total $89,865,000
FEE PORTION: 56.0% $50,324,400
Other funding $39,540,600
305 City Transit System
Street Car Starter Project
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Streetcar Vehicles 2 EA $1,000,000 $2,000,000
Streetcar Track Work 3 Miles $9,000,000 $27,000,000
Total $29,000,000
Rounded $29,000,000
FEE PORTION: 56.0% $16,240,000
Other funding $12,760,000
56% NEW DEVELOPMENT SHARE, 44% CITY OBLIGATION
56% NEW DEVELOPMENT SHARE, 44% CITY OBLIGATION
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
306 Transit Facilities
Light Rail
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
B. Light Rail Stations at
•Horn Road 1 LS $8,000,000 $8,000,000
•Mine Shaft 1 LS $5,000,000 $5,000,000
C. Station Upgrades at 4 EA $500,000 $2,000,000
•Mather Field/Mills
•Zinfandel
•Cordova Town Center
•Sunrise Boulevard
Subtotal $15,000,000
Contingency 25% $3,750,000
Engineering and Permits 0% $0
Acquire R/W for Horn Road LRT Station 1 ACRE $610,000 $610,000 Total $19,360,000
Rounded $19,360,000
FEE PORTION: 56.0% $10,841,600
Other funding $8,518,400
56% NEW DEVELOPMENT SHARE, 44% CITY OBLIGATION
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
307 Canal & Roadway Bike Trail Undercrossings and Overcorssings Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Subtotal $62,368,660
Contingency 0% $0
Engineering and Permits 0% $0
Total $62,368,660
Rounded $62,369,000
FEE PORTION: $26,000,000
Existing $286,620
Not Identified $36,369,000
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $25,713,380
308 Bike Trails
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Mather Heritage Trail 1 LS $4,103,546 $4,103,546
Rod Beaudry - Routier Road Bikeway 1 LS $2,315,549 $2,315,549 Anatolia Preserve Bike Trail 1 LS $1,577,331 $1,577,331 Stone Creek Trail Ped Signals @ Kilgore and Zinfandel 1 LS $700,041 $700,041 Douglas Road Bike & Pedestrian connection to Folsom South Canal 1 LS $230,423 $230,423 Class I Bike Trail Connections
Rio del Oro Tr. East Boundary to Grant Line 0.9 miles $1,200,000 $1,080,000 Rio del Oro Tr. West Boundary to FSC 0.5 miles $1,200,000 $600,000 Aerojet Spur Tr. FSC to Citrus Rd. Trail 0.8 miles $1,200,000 $960,000 Sunrise Blvd. Tr. FSC to Sunrise Station 0.7 miles $1,200,000 $840,000 Sunrise Station to Citrus Rd. Trail 0.25 miles $1,200,000 $300,000 Class II Bike Trail System 1 LS $400,000 $400,000
Right of Way for Trail Connections 3 ACRE $871,200 $2,613,600 Subtotal $15,720,490
Total $15,720,490
Rounded $15,720,000
FEE PORTION: 56.0% $8,803,200
$7,943,477
$1,026,677
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $7,776,523
See "Bike Grade Sep" Tab in Spreadsheet, does not include "Vision" crossings Other Funding Beyond 44% City Obligation
Other Funding
56% NEW DEVELOPMENT SHARE, 44% CITY OBLIGATION
Other
Funding
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
311 Traffic Signal Control System
Area: 34% - 1; 66% - 2
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Traffic Control Center 1 LS $7,500,000 $7,500,000
Subtotal $7,500,000
Contingency 15% $1,125,000
Engineering and Permits 35% $2,625,000
Intermediate Street Signals 40 EA $403,000 $16,120,000
$1,552,449
Total $28,922,449
Rounded $28,922,000
Credit Agreement $3,289,941
$5,099,253
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $20,532,806
City Projects already built
Other Funding
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
Interchanges
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
313 Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange
Interchange
District 2
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Total Cost Interchange 1 LS $89,154,250 $89,154,250
Total Cost Auxiliary Lanes 1 LS $27,741,250 $27,741,250 Subtotal $116,895,500
Contingency 0% $0
Engineering and Permits 0% $0
Total $116,895,500
Rounded $116,896,000
City Project $5,000,000
$500,000
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $116,396,000
316 Bradshaw Road Interchange
No Improvements in Fee Program
District 1
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
No Improvements in Fee Program 1 LS $0 $0
Subtotal $0
Contingency 15% $0
Engineering and Permits 35% $0
Acquisition of Right of Way Right of Way (Commercial) SF $105.00 $0 Total $0
Rounded $0
County Portion 50% $0
Other funding $0
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $0
COUNTY SHARED PROJECT
Other Funding
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
317 Mather Field Road Interchange
Capacity and Bike Improvements
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
1 LS $2,000,000 $2,000,000
1 LS $2,000,000 $2,000,000
1 LS $4,000,000 $4,000,000
Subtotal $8,000,000
Contingency 15% $1,200,000
Engineering and Permits 35% $2,800,000
Total $12,000,000
Rounded $12,000,000
$2,640,000
FEE PORTION $9,360,000
318.1 Zinfandel Drive Interchange
Zinfandel Complex
Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Same as Initial Phase, plus widened White Rock Road for 1 LS $51,449,000 $51,449,000 3 WB thru lanes and 3 EB to NB left turn lanes, and
widened Zinfandel to 6 lanes from US50 to Folsom Subtotal $51,449,000 Replaces 302, 318, 207 Contingency 0% $0
Engineering and Permits 0% $0
Total $51,449,000
Rounded $51,449,000
FEE PORTION 50% $25,724,500
City Project $8,585,000
Identified $7,815,000
Not Identified $17,909,500
Remaining Fee Portion Cost $25,724,500
44% Share of bike lane and sidewalk
50% NEW DEVELOPMENT SHARE, 50% CITY OBLIGATION
Upgrade some elements to Caltrans standards
Bike Lane and Sidewalk along SB (west side)- requires bridge widening Widen EB Ramp to add turn lane plus portion of SB Mather Field Rd to 3 Lanes (from SB On-ramp to SB Off Ramp)
56% Development Share for Bike Lane and Sidewalk
Other Funding
Other
Funding
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
ID No Project Information and Cost
320 Hazel Avenue Interchange
Modify Interchange with Grade Separation of Folsom Blvd and Light Rail Item Description Section Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
County Interchange Project 1 LS $83,402,000 $83,402,000 Total $83,402,000
County Portion 100% $83,402,000
0% $0
100% COUNTY
Fee Portion
12/20/2021 C:\Users\michael.mauch\Desktop\2021 TDIF Program - Master Spreadsheet - Draft Fees - 8-4-2021 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
December 2021 FINAL
Appendix C
Improvement Cost Estimation Methodology
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
To: City of Rancho Cordova
From: Steven Robinson P.E.
Date: July 23, 2021
Subject: Rancho Cordova Fee Program 2021 Update: Unit Cost and Cost Estimate Methodology
Wood Rodgers, Inc. (Wood Rodgers) was tasked by the City of Rancho Cordova (City) to update the roadway and intersection cost estimates with current 2021 construction costs for use in the 2021 Fee Program Update. This memorandum summarizes the methodology used to develop the item unit prices and cost estimates.
UNIT PRICES
Construction item unit prices for the major roadway construction items were updated from their 2013 values. The City provided to Wood Rodgers bid results of City projects that were constructed between 2016 and 2018 to use as a basis for adjusting unit prices. However, since these results were over two years old, the provided information was deemed to be outdated for the purposes of this update. To update the unit prices for items to current 2021 unit costs, Wood Rodgers increased 2013 Fee Program unit prices by approximately 2 percent per year, based on the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index information between 2013 and 2021. This resulted in an overall unit price increase of approximately 18 percent between 2013 and 2021.
Since the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index uses an average of nationwide bid prices, Wood Rodgers compared the escalated unit prices to local Caltrans District 3 unit prices from the Caltrans Contract Cost Database, which is a database Caltrans maintains of all bid results from their projects. However, at the time of the unit price update, the Caltrans Contract Cost Database only contained bid results up to the year of 2020. Those results were further increased by approximately 2 percent to escalate unit costs to 2021. The more conservative price (i.e. highest price) between the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index and the Caltrans Contract Cost Database was chosen as the 2021 unit price for each item in the Fee Program calculation.
A few items, such as storm drain system, street lights (frontage), storm water pollution prevention plan, and traffic signals were calculated differently than the rest of the construction items. Details on those unit price calculations are described in the following sections of this memorandum.
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
Storm drain system unit prices were developed with the assumption that the Fee Program will be responsible for constructing the storm drain main along the middle of the road, and the Developers will be responsible for constructing the drainage inlets and lateral pipes that connect to the main pipe. The unit price for Storm Drain System (Fee) was developed assuming an average storm drain main pipe size and type of 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe and one (1) manhole every 500 feet, per Sacramento County standard for maximum manhole spacing. This assumption is consistent with the 2013 Fee Program Update. The following formula was used to calculate a per linear foot cost for Storm Drain System (Fee):
(($180/Ft 24-inch-Pipe x 500 Ft 24-inch-Pipe) + ($4,500 x 1 Manhole)) / 500 Ft ≈ $200 per linear foot ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
The 2013 Fee Program Update assumed a unit price of $85 per linear foot for 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe. This price was based on the average bid price for 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe in 2013, as obtained from the Caltrans Contract Cost Data website. As shown in Figure 1, the unit price for 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe was at a 10- year low in 2012-2013 when the 2013 Fee Program Update was prepared. Since 2013, the unit price per linear foot of 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe has steadily increased to a total of $176 per linear foot in 2020. The 2020 unit price of the pipe was increased by 2 percent and rounded to $180 per linear foot. This results in the unit price having more than doubled since 2013.
It should be noted that the large spike between 2019 and 2020 is likely due to worldwide shortages in concrete building materials caused by COVID-19. However, it is unknown when or if these prices will drop, so reducing the unit price for 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe could result in a funding shortfall.
The unit price for Storm Drain System (Developer) was developed assuming a storm drain lateral of 12-inch plastic pipe and two (2) drain inlets (DIs) every 500 feet. The following formula was used to calculate a per linear foot cost for Storm Drain System (Developer):
(($120/Ft 12-inch-Pipe x 80 Ft 12-inch Pipe) + ($3,000 x 2 DIs)) / 500 Ft ≈ $30 per linear foot The 2013 Fee Program Update assumed a unit price of $70 per linear foot for 12-inch plastic pipe. This price was based on the average bid price for 12-inch pipe in 2013, as obtained from the Caltrans Contract Cost Data website. As shown in Figure 2, the unit price of the item has varied throughout the years. Since 2013, the unit price per linear foot of 12-inch plastic pipe has increased to a total of approximately $116 per linear foot in 2020. The 2020 unit price of the pipe was increased by 2 percent and rounded to $120 per linear foot.
STREET LIGHTS (FRONTAGE)
Street lighting was not included on any of the projects used to develop unit price assumptions, and as such, bid prices for street lighting were not available. Therefore, Wood Rodgers used its best judgment and knowledge based on various other projects to develop the unit price. Based on several roadway projects Wood Rodgers has recently been involved with in Northern California, street light prices have been observed to vary between $5,000 and $10,000 each in 2020. Averaging these prices and rounding to the nearest thousand results in an average per street light price of $8,000. This price also includes equipment necessary for street lighting, such as pull boxes, conduit, and wiring. City street lighting standards require street lights to be spaced approximately 200 feet apart. At this spacing, 10 street lights will be needed for every 1,000 feet of road [five (5) each side]. The following formula was used to calculate a per linear foot cost for Street Lights (Frontage):
($8,000 x 10 Street Lights) / 1,000 feet x 1.02 escalation factor = $82 per linear foot
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
Figure 1. Price History of 24" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Caltrans Item Code: 650018)
Source: Caltrans Contract Cost Data Website: https://sv08data.dot.ca.gov/contractcost/
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
Figure 2. Price History of 12” Plastic Pipe (Caltrans Item Code: 641101)
Source: Caltrans Contract Cost Data Website: https://sv08data.dot.ca.gov/contractcost/
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
The price for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is typically a lump sum price in bids/estimates and therefore is challenging to estimate. The Caltrans Contract Cost Database could not be used for calculations because the lump sum price on a SWPPP varies by project, as every project has different requirements. The previous Fee Program estimated $18 per linear foot of roadway based on Wood Rodgers’ judgment and experience. Similar to other items, a two (2) percent increase per year was applied to the 2013 unit price, escalating the unit price of SWPPP to $25 per linear foot in 2021.
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
The 2013 Fee Program Update assumed a unit price of $55,000 per leg for new traffic signals, and $37,500 per leg for modify traffic signal. Since 2013, Caltrans has released new standards for traffic signals that have significantly increased the cost of materials of traffic signal equipment, particularly poles and the costs for constructing foundations. Both the County of Sacramento and the City follow Caltrans standards for traffic signal equipment.
Wood Rodgers is aware that these new standards have also increased the time and labor it takes to manufacture the ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
equipment, with those labor costs passed on to the City. Collectively, this has resulted in an increase in the cost of traffic signals by approximately 60 percent. In 2013, the cost to install a traffic signal at a 4-leg intersection was averaging around $250,000. In 2020, bid results show that cost had increased to approximately $450,000, with some large intersections costing as much as $500,000. Because of this, the unit price for the 2021 Fee Program has increased to $120,500 per leg for new traffic signals, and to $82,000 per leg for modify traffic signal.
LANDSCAPING
The 2013 Fee Program Update used a unit price of $6 per square foot Frontage Landscaping and permanent Median Landscaping. Recent bid results for projects in and around the City of Rancho Cordova from the past few years have provided landscaping unit prices that range between $11 and $14 per square foot. After review of the bids, Wood Rodgers determined that the prices at the higher $13 to $14 per square foot bid prices have primarily come in 2020.
Wood Rodgers believes that these increased prices in 2020 are largely a result of the scarcity of materials due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Because the price increases due to COVID-19 are expected to be temporary, a unit price of $11 per square foot was used for Frontage Landscaping and permanent Median Landscaping in the 2021 Fee Program.
ROADWAY SEGMENT COST ESTIMATES
The 2013 spreadsheet used in the 2013 unit price evaluation was set up to calculate the Fee and Developer funded portions of the cost per foot of a typical 2-lane, 4-lane, and 6-lane roadway section. Using this spreadsheet as a template, Wood Rodgers created new 2-lane, 4-lane and 6-lane roadway sections for both ultimate buildout and phased options based on possible phased construction per DKS Associates’ new future traffic demand model and City input. New quantities were calculated for each section, and the updated 2021 item unit prices were applied to calculate an overall roadway cost per linear foot. Asphalt concrete and aggregate base thicknesses were assumed to be the same as those used in 2013. Roadway segment sections are provided in the appendix.
FEE FUNDED PORTION
The Fee funded portion of the roadway consists of all roadway and features necessary to construct the No. 1 lanes and median on a 4-lane roadway, or the No. 1 and No. 2 lanes and median on a 6-lane roadway. Included in this cost is the roadway excavation and clearing and grubbing (for those lanes and median), asphalt concrete, aggregate base, median curb, cold plane asphalt concrete pavement and/or sawcut, temporary and permanent median landscaping, striping, and storm drain system main (see Storm Drain). Signal interconnect is also included as a Fee item. The Fee funded portion of the SWPPP is assumed to be 50 percent of the total SWPPP cost when roadwork includes both a City (Fee) portion and a Developer portion on the same phase. However, the Fee is assumed to pay for the full cost of the SWPPP on any phase that does not include Developer work.
Section types for roadway segments have a varying construction contingency between 20 to 30 percent. It includes 10 percent for mobilization, 10 percent for unknown and miscellaneous items, and 0 to 10 percent for stage construction and traffic handling. A percentage for stage construction and traffic handling is only applied to roadways that were partially constructed by a previous project or phase; this percentage is zero for new roadways. The contingency of each section type varies according to stage and number of lanes.
DEVELOPER FUNDED PORTION
Consistent with the assumptions used in the 2013 Fee Program Update, it was assumed that the Developer funded portion is made up of a 33-foot wide section (on each side of road) consisting of outside frontage landscaping (8 feet wide), curb, gutter, sidewalk (7 feet wide), and street lighting. Also included is the outside 15 feet of roadway (outermost lane and shoulder), consisting of all asphalt concrete, aggregate base, striping, and storm drain DI’s and ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
laterals (see Storm Drain). The Developer funded portion includes all excavation and clearing and grubbing required within this 33 feet.
The Developer funded portion of the SWPPP is assumed to be 50 percent of the total SWPPP cost when roadwork is required by both the City (Fee) and the Developer on the same phase. The Developer is assumed to cover the full cost of the storm drain system and SWPPP when no City (Fee) work is required, such as on 2-lane roads.
ROADWAY PHASING
Roadway phasing is applicable when a roadway segment is only partially built with the initial construction and is then completed as a separate project in the future. Three different roadway segment phasing options/configurations were developed based on discussions with the City. Since every project and roadway segment is constructed under different circumstances, these phasing options/configurations are generalizations of the various ways the City has typically been phasing projects since the 2013 Fee Program Update. In general, roadways have been constructed from the outside in, with the outermost lane(s) and frontage being constructed first at the same time the adjacent development that necessitates the roadway is built, with the inner lanes built in a later phase. The three options/configurations are:
1. Option A: This option assumes that parcels on one (1) side of the road are fully developed by the end of the first phase of roadway construction. Land on the opposite side of the road is projected to be developed soon after the roadway segment is complete. This option constructs the frontage and outside lane (Developer portion) on the developed side of the road, and the inside lane (Fee portion) on the undeveloped side in the first phase.
2. Option B: This option assumes that one (1) side of the road is fully developed by the end of the first phase of roadway construction, and the opposite side is not anticipated to be developed or completed in the near future. This option constructs all frontage and lanes (Fee and Developer portions) on the developed side of the road in the first phase, and nothing on the undeveloped side.
3. Option C: This option assumes that parcels on both side of the roadway are fully developed by the end of the first phase of roadway construction. This option constructs the frontage and outside lane (Developer portion) on both sides of the road in the first phase, and no lanes in the Fee portion on either side.
When a roadway is phased, the first phase will include a 2 to 5-foot wide inside paved shoulder and a total minimum paved roadbed width of 20 feet in each travel direction, with frontage on at least one side of the road. This requires that the storm drain system (main and manholes) always be constructed under Phase 1, as the gutter and drainage inlets installed by the Developer need the main storm drain pipe to drain to. Median area intended to be converted to roadway in a future phase will be minimally landscaped with temporary plants and/or ground cover. The permanent median area will be landscaped with permanent plants and ground cover if either of the No. 1 lanes are included. It is also assumed that signal interconnect is always installed in Phase 1, as most if not all major intersections will be signalized in the first phase. Excavation, clearing and grubbing, asphalt concrete, aggregate base, curb for the median, striping, signal interconnect, storm drain system and SWPPP are all assumed to be required as part of the Fee cost in Phase 1. It is assumed that the cost of the SWPPP is split 50-50 between the Fee and the Developer.
For each future phase, the temporary median being converted to roadway will require excavation, clearing and grubbing, asphalt concrete, aggregate base, striping of the new lane, and possibly median. A new SWPPP is also assumed to be required at full cost to the Fee if there is no Developer portion required. The cost of the SWPPP is split 50-50 between the Fee and the Developer if there is a Developer portion.
The City has found that the sequence of how roadway segments are being constructed are largely based on the Developer’s needs, and the phasing estimates from the 2013 Fee Program Update have not generally matched actual phasing/staging. In an effort to provide more flexibility with how the roadways are ultimately phased, a flat phasing percentage has been calculated and applied to each roadway segment rather than assuming a specific phasing option/configuration for the 2021 Fee Program Update.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
To develop the flat phasing cost percentage, estimated construction costs of ultimate roadway segment buildout without phasing of each roadway section type, excluding all contingencies, were compared to the costs of each phase respective to its option and roadway width. A calculation was performed to approximate the percentage increase of the total ultimate buildout unit cost. For example, Phase 1 Option A of an ultimate 4-lane roadway constructs one (1) lane in each direction and a median. The cost to construct one (1) linear foot of Phase 1 Option A is calculated to be approximately 76 percent of the cost to construct one (1) linear foot of a complete 4-lane roadway. The cost to construct one (1) linear foot of Phase 2 Option A, which constructs the remainder of the roadway including frontage, would cost approximately 32 percent of the cost to construct one (1) linear foot of a complete 4-lane roadway. For each additional phase, an additional 10 percent each was added to the increased phase construction cost for both mobilization and traffic handling. This cost was split 50-50 between Fee and Developer portions. Per this example, a linear foot cost of phased Option A will ultimately cost approximately eight (8) percent more than the same linear foot of roadway constructed entirely at one time.
Phase # Buildout Cost / Ultimate Buildout without Phasing Construction Cost = Phase # Cost Percentage Phase 1 Cost Percentage + Phase 2 Cost Percentage – 100% = Increased Phase Construction Cost 76% + 32% - 100% = 8% Increased Phase Construction Cost Total Phase Construction Cost Increase = 8% + 10%/2 (Mobilization) + 10%/2 (Traffic Handling) = 18% The phasing costs for all 4-lane roadway options/configurations were evaluated and averaged together to develop a single 4-lane roadway segment phasing cost. The result was an average cost increase of 20 percent for a phased 4-lane roadway segment compared to a 4-lane road segment that was not phased. A similar evaluation was performed for 6- lane road segments, which resulted in an average cost increase of 30 percent for a phased 6-lane roadway segment compared to a 6-lane road segment that was not phased. In the Fee calculations, these percent increases were applied as an additional cost to the ultimate roadway segment buildout without phasing 4-lane and 6-lane roadway segments as appropriate.
INTERSECTION COST ESTIMATES
The intersection cost estimates were developed to provide a single total cost for each intersection configuration assuming full buildout. Intersection costs include all features on each leg of the roadway within 450 feet of the center of the intersection. Similar to the roadway estimates, a spreadsheet was set up to calculate the Fee and Developer funded portions for each intersection configuration per DKS Associates’ future traffic demand model.
Configurations were based on the number of lanes per leg of an intersection. For example, a 4x4 intersection configuration consists of a 4-lane roadway segment on all legs; a 4x6 Tee intersection configuration consists of a 4- lane roadway segment in the through direction legs, with a 6-lane roadway segment in the Tee leg. Phased construction of the intersection was not included in the fee calculation as part of the 2021 Fee Program Update due to the City finding that intersections have generally not been constructed under any consistent methodology that can be easily documented or quantified. Intersection sections are provided in the appendix.
FEE FUNDED PORTION
The Fee funded portion of the roadway consists of all roadway and features necessary to construct the No. 1 lanes and median on a 4-lane roadway, or the No. 1 and No. 2 lanes and median on a 6-lane roadway, and all left turn lanes, at an intersection. Included in this cost is the roadway excavation and clearing and grubbing for the inside lane(s) and median, asphalt concrete, aggregate base, median curb, temporary and permanent median landscaping, striping, and storm drain system main (see Storm Drain). Also included is the curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps at the curb returns, plus 25 feet in either direction. The Developer funded portion does not include this 70± feet of hardscape at ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
the curb return. The Fee funded portion of the SWPPP is assumed to be 50 percent of the total SWPPP cost. Also included in the Fee funded portion is an item for signal interconnect and all traffic signal costs.
Each intersection configuration has a 15 percent contingency applied to the Fee cost, regardless of the type or the size of the intersection. It includes five (5) percent for mobilization (10 percent total split 50-50 between Developer and Fee), and 10 percent to account for unknowns and miscellaneous items. The contingency does not account for phased construction.
DEVELOPER FUNDED PORTION
Consistent with the assumptions used in the 2013 Fee Program Update, it was assumed that the Developer funded portion of 4-lane and 6-lane intersections consist of a 33-foot wide section (on each side of road) consisting of outside frontage landscaping (8 feet wide), curb, gutter, sidewalk (7 feet wide) (see Fee Funded Portion for exception), and street lighting. Also included was the outside 15 feet of roadway (outermost lane and shoulder), consisting of any asphalt concrete, aggregate base, striping, and storm drainage DI’s and laterals (see Storm Drain). The Developer funded portion includes all excavation and clearing and grubbing required between the right of way line and the outside 15 feet of roadway. The Developer funded portion of the SWPPP is assumed to be 50 percent of the total SWPPP cost when roadwork is required by both the City (Fee) and the Developer on the same phase.
Each intersection configuration has a 15 percent contingency applied to the Developer cost, regardless of the type or the size of the intersection. It includes five (5) percent for mobilization (10 percent split 50-50 between Developer and Fee), and 10 percent to account for unknowns and miscellaneous items.
INTERSECTION PHASING
If the City chooses to construct an intersection under phases at a later time, phase cost percentage increases were approximated for manual calculations on a project by project basis. Two (2) separate percentage increases were prepared based on whether an intersection is a full or a Tee intersection. The calculation was performed similar to the percentage cost increase calculations for a roadway segment (see Roadway Phasing). 2013 Fee Program Update unit prices were used for the percentage increase calculations because the 2013 Fee Program Update was the last update to develop phased intersection options. Although unit prices have increased since 2013, the increase in cost to construct a full buildout intersection without phasing and a full buildout intersection with phasing were assumed have increased uniformly.
Phase # Buildout Cost / Ultimate Buildout without Phasing Construction Cost = Phase # Cost Percentage Phase 1 Cost Percentage + Phase 2 Cost Percentage – 100% = Increased Phase Construction Cost The increased phase construction cost was determined to be 30 percent for four leg intersections and 20 percent for Tee intersections.
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
APPENDIX
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
4 LANE
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
4 LANE - OPTION A
PHASE 1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
4 LANE - OPTION A
PHASE 2
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
4 LANE - OPTION B
PHASE 1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
4 LANE - OPTION B
PHASE 2
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
4 LANE - OPTION C
PHASE 1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
4 LANE - OPTION C
PHASE 2
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE - OPTION A
PHASE 1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE - OPTION A
PHASE 2
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE - OPTION A
PHASE 3
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE - OPTION B
PHASE 1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE - OPTION B
PHASE 2
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE - OPTION B
PHASE 3
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE - OPTION C
PHASE 1
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE - OPTION C
PHASE 2
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
6 LANE - OPTION C
PHASE 3
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
LEGEND
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
LEGEND
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
LEGEND
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
LEGEND
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 3
1 Transportation
Development Impact
Fee Program
Date: February 7, 2022
CityOfRanchoCordova.org
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
2 Transportation Development Impact Fee Program
Council Presentation
• Background Information
– Why do we have a TDIF Program?
– Who Pays the fees?
– How are Capital Improvements identified?
• Program Update Overview
– Update of Nexus-Based Transportation Funding
– Discretionary Fee Adjustments
– 2021 Comparison by Jurisdiction
• Input from the Development Community
• Recommended Action
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
3 Transportation Development Impact Fee Program
Why do we have a TDIF Program?
=
Fair Share
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
4 Transportation Development Impact Fee Program
Who Pays the fees?
• Applies to New Development Only
– Residential developers
– Commercial developers
– Industrial developers
– Anyone developing property that will add vehicle trips to City roadways
• Land Use Categories
– Single family
– Multi-family
– Retail
– Office
– Warehouse
– Service Commercial
– Manufacturing
• Does not apply to Existing Development
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
5 Transportation Development Impact Fee Program
How are Capital Improvements
Identified?
• City Planning Documents
– Transit Plans
– Active Transportation Plans
– Safety Plans
• Roadway Level of Service – City General Plan Standards – Existing Deficiencies – Traffic Counts
– Future Deficiencies – City Travel Forecasting Model
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
6 Program Update Overview
• Current program based on major update in 2013
• 2021 U
pdate needed due to:
• Changes to City’s projected growth rate and long-term development estimates
• Update to City’s travel demand model
• The above changes result in a revised project list
• Update to construction costs for projects
• Revised funding from sources other than the Fee Program • Compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act
• Update established maximum “nexus-based” fee rates
• Reflects ENR Construction Cost Index escalation for 2022 ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
7 Update of Nexus-Based Transportation
Funding
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
8 Discretionary Fee
Adjustments• Nexus-bas ed fees represent the maximum allowable • Council adopted adjustments to some fees in 2013
Land Use
2013 Reductions
(percent of nexus-based rate)
Infill Area Growth Area
Single Family Detached > 1,200 SF 61% 100%
Single Family Detached < 1,200 SF 46% 100%
Multi-Family 56% 100%
Commercial 47% 61%
Office 52% 53%
Industrial 52% 53%
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
9 2022 Fee Schedule
Adjustments
Land Use Units
Current Fees1
Draft New Fees2
Nexus Based
Citywide
Proposed Fees
Infill Area Growth Area Infill Area Growth Area
Single Family Detached
> 1,200 SF
DU
$11,682 $19,299 $19,225 $11,637 $19,225
< 1,200 SF $7,799 $16,983 $16,918 $7,770 $16,918
Multi-Family $7,605 $13,509 $10,958 $6,169 $10,958
Commercial
Sq Ft
$10.97 $14.14 $23.84 $11.20 $14.23
Office $10.63 $10.88 $20.57 $10.68 $10.93
Industrial $5.53 $5.53 $10.58 $5.49 $5.63
Fee revenue by 2055 $945 million $780 million
Funding required from alternative sources $165 million
1 Adjusting for 2021 ENR: 8%
2 Adjusting for 2021 ENR: 8% less 5% = 7.6%
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
10 Adjusted
Infill Area
Rancho Cordova Updated
Nexus-based Fee
2021 Comparisons by Jurisdiction2021 Comparisons by Jurisdiction ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
11 2021 Comparisons by Jurisdiction
Rancho Cordova Updated
Nexus-based Fee
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
12 Adjusted
Infill Area
Adjusted
Growth Area
Rancho Cordova Updated
Nexus-based Fee
2021 Comparisons by Jurisdiction
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
13 Adjusted
Infill Area
Adjusted
Growth Area
Rancho Cordova Updated
Nexus-based Fee
2021 Comparisons by Jurisdiction
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
14 Adjusted
Infill Area
Adjusted
Growth Area
Rancho Cordova Updated
Nexus-based Fee
2021 Comparisons by Jurisdiction
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
15 Input from Development
Community
• Collaborated with the BIA and other developers throughout the pro
cess
• Proactively addressed BIA questions and comments
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
16 • Adopt 2021 Nexus Study
• Adopt Staff recommendations on adjustments to
nex
us-based fee rates for application in 2022
Recommended Actions
Recommended Action
ITEM 10.2.
ATTACHMENT 4
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 11.1.
DATE: February 7, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Steve Harriman, Public Works Division Manager
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE RATE
ADJUSTMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STATE
MANDATED RESIDENTIAL FOOD WASTE COLLECTION AND
RECYCLING PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
The public hearing will allow rate payers to comment on proposed adjustments to residential solid waste rates for the period from July 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024 for implementation of the state-mandated residential food waste collection and recycling program. Adoption of the resolution will approve the proposed rate adjustments and direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Collection Service and Street Sweeping Contract with Allied Waste Services of North America (dba Republic Services) for Council approval at a later date.
BACKGROUND
SB 1383: Organic Waste Recycling Law
State law (SB 1383) requires implementation of a variety of programs intended to divert organic waste food scraps and food-soiled paper products from landfill disposal. The intent of the law is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from landfills in an effort to mitigate climate change. One such SB 1383 program under development is a residential food waste collection and recycling program, which is scheduled for implementation in July 2022. When the program begins residents will place food waste and food-soiled paper products in the green cart with yard clippings rather than in the garbage cart.
On November 1, 2021, the City Council directed staff to proceed with a 21.5% rate adjustment for implementation of the residential food waste collection and recycling program in July 2022. The rate adjustment is necessary to provide funding for additional collection vehicles and drivers, and increased processing costs for mixed organic materials.
Proposition 218: The Right to Vote on Taxes Initiative
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
Article XIIID, Section 6 of the California Constitution, added by voters with the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996, allows property owners and customers of record to protest proposed rate adjustments for some municipal services, including waste collection and street sweeping. The proposed rate adjustments may not be implemented if the majority of the affected property owners or customers of record submit a valid written protest. As required by State law, on December 15, 2021, the City mailed a notice to all residential solid waste customers with the proposed rate adjustments for the period from July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024 (Attachment 2). The notice also included the date and time of the public hearing and instructions on submitting a valid written protest to the proposed rate adjustments.
Republic Services currently serves 19,578 residential solid waste customer accounts in the City of Rancho Cordova. The proposed rate adjustments may therefore not proceed if 9,790 valid protests are received prior to the close of the public hearing (19,578/2) +1=9,790). If less than 9,790 protests are received prior to the close of the public hearing, staff recommends the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the proposed rate adjustments and directing staff to prepare an amendment to the Collection Service and Street Sweeping Contract with Republic Services for Council approval at a later date.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
The Resolution has no impact on the General Fund. Republic Services currently pays a 10% franchise fee on gross collected revenue for the provision of residential solid waste services in Rancho Cordova. In FY 2020/21 the City received approximately $682,000 in franchise fees through this contract, which funds a portion of the Public Works operating budget. On November 1, 2021, the City Council directed staff to reduce the franchise fee rate from 10% to 8%, which would reduce annual franchise fee revenue by an estimated $71,000, to $611,000 per year.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Prop 218 Notice to Residents
3. Residential Solid Waste Rate Schedule
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA APPROVING RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE RATE ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2022, THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2024 AND DIRECTING
STAFF TO PREPARE AN AMENDMENT FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL TO THE
COLLECTION SERVICE AND STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT WITH REPUBLIC
SERVICES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STATE MANDATED FOOD WASTE COLLECTION AND RECYCLING PROGRAM IN JULY 2022
WHEREAS, in September 2016, Governor Brown signed the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Act (SB 1383) into law; and
WHEREAS, on January 1, 2018, the City and Republic Services entered into a seven- year Collection Service and Street Sweeping Contract (Contract Number 67-2017); and WHEREAS, City and Republic staff developed the program design and negotiated rate adjustments for the residential food waste collection and recycling program when the SB 1383 regulations were finalized by CalRecycle in November 2020; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021, the City Council directed staff to proceed with a
21.5% adjustment to residential solid waste rates on July 1, 2022, for implementation of the residential food waste collection and recycling program; and WHEREAS, State Law (Proposition 218) allows property owners and customers of record to protest proposed rate adjustments for some municipal services, and the proposed adjustments may not be implemented if the majority of the affected property owners submit a valid written protest; and
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2021, the City mailed a public hearing notice to all residential solid waste rate payers with the date and time of the public hearing and instructions on submitting a valid written protest to the proposed rate adjustments; and WHEREAS, the majority of the affected property owners did not submit a valid written protest to the proposed rate adjustments prior to the close of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, City Council adoption of this Resolution will allow City staff and Republic Services to proceed with the implementation of the state-mandated residential food waste collection and recycling program in July 2022.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does approve the proposed residential solid waste rate adjustments for the period from July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024 as shown in the Residential Solid Waste Rate Schedule, and directs staff to prepare an amendment to the Collection Service and Street Sweeping Contract with Republic Services for implementation of the residential food waste collection and recycling program in July 2022.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 7th
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 2 day of February 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Donald Terry, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
2729 Prospect Park Drive | Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 | 916.851.8700 | CityofRanchoCordova.org December 15, 2021
Dear
City of Rancho Cordova Residential Solid Waste Customer:
Not
ice of Public Hearing on February 7, 2022, at 5:30 p.m.
Proposed Fee Increases for Residential Garbage, Organics, Recycling and Street Sweeping Services The P
roposed Fee Increases are Necessary to Comply with a New State Law Mandating Implementation of Organic Waste Recycling Programs
This
notice contains information about proposed fee increases for City of Rancho Cordova residential solid waste customers scheduled for July 1, 2022, July 1, 2023, and July 1, 2024. State law allows property owners and customers of record to protest proposed fee increases for some municipal services, including waste collection and street sweeping. The proposed fee increases may not be implemented if the majority of the affected property owners or customers of record submits a written protest. This letter contains instructions on filing a written protest.
Why ar
e residential solid waste and recycling fees proposed to increase? The
re are two reasons why residential solid waste fees are proposed to increase. First, State law requires implementation of a new residential organic waste collection program. When the program starts, residents will place food waste and food-soiled paper products in the yard waste cart with yard clippings, rather than in the garbage cart. This new program will require additional funding for new collection trucks and drivers, and increased processing costs for the mixed organic materials. Second, the contract between the City of Rancho Cordova and Republic Services allows an annual fee adjustment on July 1st to cover cost increases for fuel, labor, vehicle maintenance, waste disposal, etc.
What a
re the proposed new fees?
The
table on the following page shows the current and proposed fees.
ITEM 11.1.
ATTACHMENT 2
2729 Prospect Park Drive | Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 | 916.851.8700 | CityofRanchoCordova.org Monthl
y Service Rates Cur
rent
Monthly Fees
through
6/30/22
Proposed
Monthly
Fees
7/1/22
Proposed
Monthly
Fees
7/1/23
Proposed
Monthly
Fees
7/1/24
32-gallon trash can (see note #1) $22.34 $27.29 $28.11 $28.95 64-gallon trash can (see note #1) $26.59 $32.49 $33.46 $34.47 96-gallon trash can (see note #1) $35.42 $43.27 $44.57 $45.91 Street Sweeping $1.00 $1.03 $1.06 $1.09
Additional large item collection per yard
(over 10 yards) $10.38 $10.69 $11.01 $11.34
Late set-out trash per cart
(same day collection) $6.72 $6.92 $7.13 $7.34
Late set-out trash per cart
(next day collection) $11.39 $11.73 $12.08 $12.45
Late set-out recycle per cart
(same day collection) $6.11 $6.29 $6.48 $6.68
Late set out recycle per cart
(next day collection) $9.50 $9.79 $10.08 $10.38
Late set-out greenwaste per cart
(same day collection) $6.11 $6.29 $6.48 $6.68
Late set-out greenwaste per cart
(next day collection) $10.80 $11.12 $11.46 $11.80
Extra 32-gallon trash cart $6.09 $7.44 $7.66 $7.89
Extra 64-gallon trash cart $8.55 $10.44 $10.75 $11.08
Extra 96-gallon trash cart $12.10 $14.78 $15.22 $15.68
Extra recycle cart $2.73 $2.81 $2.90 $2.98
Extra greenwaste cart $3.95 $4.83 $4.97 $5.12
Extra cart exchange $30.25 $31.16 $32.09 $33.05
Recycle contamination fee $11.39 $22.00 $22.66 $23.34
Greenwaste contamination fee $11.39 $22.00 $22.66 $23.34 32-gallon cart replacement
with delivery $71.45 $73.59 $75.80 $78.08
64-gallon cart replacement
with delivery $76.28 $78.57 $80.93 $83.35
96-gallon cart replacement
with delivery $81.13 $83.56 $86.07 $88.65
(1) The monthly fees for residential waste collection and recycling services are dependent on the garbage can size. The monthly fees cover the following services: curbside collection of trash, recyclables, organics, batteries, oil, oil filters and sharps; public education and outreach; customer service and billing; and the bulky item program and illegal dumping collection.
ITEM 11.1.
ATTACHMENT 2
2729 Prospect Park Drive | Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 | 916.851.8700 | CityofRanchoCordova.org Publi
c Hearing on Proposed Rate Increase
As required by State law, the Rancho Cordova City Council will conduct a public hearing to receive public comment on the proposed fee increases on Monday, February 7, 2022, at 5:30 p.m. The location of the public hearing is the City Council Chambers in the Rancho Cordova City Hall located at 2729 Prospect Park Drive. Residential property owners and customers of record may appear in person or virtually at the public hearing to comment on the proposed fee increases.
Inst
ructions on Submitting a Written Protest to the Proposed Fee Increase A va
lid written protest must be submitted to the City Clerk to formally protest the proposed fee increases. Property owners or customers of record receiving residential solid waste and recycling services may submit a written protest by mail or in-person to the City Clerk at 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670. Protests must include the following information to be deemed valid:
1. A sta
tement that the proposed fee increase is being protested.
2. Nam
e of the property owner or customer of record submitting the protest.
3. The as
sessor’s parcel number and/or street address of the parcel submitting the protest.
4. Origin
al wet signature, date, and printed name of the property owner or customer of record submitting the protest.
5. A sta
tement by the named property owner or customer of record affirming the contents of the protest are true and correct.
Addit
ional Instructions
• The
following page contains a protest form that you may complete, sign and return to the City Clerk.
• Protests submitted by email, fax, or photocopy do not count as written protests. • Only
one written protest per identified parcel will be counted. • The Cit
y Clerk’s Office will tabulate the protests at the conclusion of the public hearing, and any member of the public may observe the tabulation.
• All pro
tests are public records and will be retained by the City Clerk for a minimum of two years.
ITEM 11.1.
ATTACHMENT 2
2729 Prospect Park Drive | Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 | 916.851.8700 | CityofRanchoCordova.org Wri
tten Protest Form
You
may complete, sign and submit this form to protest the proposed solid waste fee increases scheduled for July 1, 2022, July 1, 2023, and July 1, 2024. Please either mail or hand-deliver this form to the following address:
Rate P
rotest / Office of the City Clerk
Rancho Cordova City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
This form must be received by the City Clerk at 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 prior to the close of the public hearing, which begins at 5:30 p.m. on February 7, 2022 in the City Council Chambers at Rancho Cordova City Hall. Protests submitted by email, fax or photocopy do not count as formal written protests.
1. You
r Name (please print legibly):
__________
______________________________
2. I a
m the (please select one):
_______
Property Owner
_______ C
ustomer of Record
3. Ass
essor’s Parcel Number and/or Street Address
__________
______________________________
__________
______________________________
4. I hereby protest the proposed July 1, 2022, July 1, 2023, and July 1, 2024 fee increases. (please initial) _______
5. By s
igning below, I certify that the contents of this protest are true and correct:
__________
_________________________
Original Wet Signature
__________
_________________________
Date
ITEM 11.1.
ATTACHMENT 2
ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 3 Residential Solid Waste Rate Schedule
July 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024
Current
Monthly Fees
through
6/30/22
Proposed
Monthly
Fees
7/1/22
Proposed
Monthly
Fees
7/1/23
Proposed
Monthly
Fees
7/1/24
32-gallon trash can (see note #1) $22.34 $27.29 $28.11 $28.95 64-gallon trash can (see note #1) $26.59 $32.49 $33.46 $34.47 96-gallon trash can (see note #1) $35.42 $43.27 $44.57 $45.91 Street Sweeping $1.00 $1.03 $1.06 $1.09
Additional large item collection per
yard (over 10 yards) $10.38 $10.69 $11.01 $11.34
Late set-out trash per cart
(same day collection) $6.72 $6.92 $7.13 $7.34
Late set-out trash per cart
(next day collection) $11.39 $11.73 $12.08 $12.45
Late set-out recycle per cart
(same day collection) $6.11 $6.29 $6.48 $6.68
Late set out recycle per cart
(next day collection) $9.50 $9.79 $10.08 $10.38
Late set-out greenwaste per cart
(same day collection) $6.11 $6.29 $6.48 $6.68
Late set-out greenwaste per cart
(next day collection) $10.80 $11.12 $11.46 $11.80
Extra 32-gallon trash cart $6.09 $7.44 $7.66 $7.89
Extra 64-gallon trash cart $8.55 $10.44 $10.75 $11.08
Extra 96-gallon trash cart $12.10 $14.78 $15.22 $15.68
Extra recycle cart $2.73 $2.81 $2.90 $2.98
Extra greenwaste cart $3.95 $4.83 $4.97 $5.12
Extra cart exchange $30.25 $31.16 $32.09 $33.05
Recycle contamination fee $11.39 $22.00 $22.66 $23.34
Greenwaste contamination fee $11.39 $22.00 $22.66 $23.34 32-gallon cart replacement
with delivery $71.45 $73.59 $75.80 $78.08
64-gallon cart replacement
with delivery $76.28 $78.57 $80.93 $83.35
96-gallon cart replacement
with delivery $81.13 $83.56 $86.07 $88.65