Rancho Cordova City Council
January 17, 2023

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday, January 17, 2023
4:30 PM - Special Meeting/Closed Session
5:30 PM – Regular Meeting
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
Pursuant to California Assembly Bill 361 amending the Ralph M. Brown Act (Govt. Code 54950-54963), the City has declared a state of emergency relating to COVID-19 and imposed measures to promote social distancing.

Join the Meeting Via Zoom Link:
https://cityofranchocordova.zoom.us/j/82684375870?pwd=NmV6M3AzanFnbkRtUHVFbmpRWFNKdz09

Join the Meeting via the Zoom Phone Number
Zoom Phone Number: +1 669 900 6833, +1 253 215 8782, +1 309 205 3325 Webinar ID: 826 8437 5870
Password: 578969
Instructions to Make Public Comment
Submitting Public Comment via Email

Members of the public who wish to provide public comment via email will need to submit written comments to [email protected] no later than 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 17, 2023. Written comments received no later than 3:00 p.m. will be distributed to the Council, filed in the record, and will not be read aloud. All comments submitted later than 3:00 p.m. will be distributed to the Council.

Listening to a Zoom Meeting by Zoom Video Conference
To make a public comment using the Zoom platform, please use the “raise hand” feature at the bottom center of the screen. Please make sure to enable audio controls once access has been given

Rancho Cordova City Council - AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting of Tuesday, January 17, 2023

by the City Clerk’s office to speak. Please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.

Listening to a Zoom Meeting by Phone Only
You can join a Zoom meeting via teleconferencing/audio conferencing using a cell phone or traditional landline phone. To request to make a public comment by phone press *9 to raise your hand. Please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.

All public comments will be limited to three-minutes.

If you have questions related to the City Council Meeting or the use of Zoom, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 851-8720 before Tuesday, January 17, 2023, at 3:00 p.m.

AGENDA

1. SPECIAL MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

Council Members Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge

2. PUBLIC COMMENT

At a special meeting, citizens wishing to address the Council for any matter on the agenda may do so at the time the matter is discussed. Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not on the agenda.

3. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION

Mayor Budge will adjourn the meeting to closed session.

4. CLOSED SESSION - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

Council Members Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge

5. CLOSED SESSION

Council will meet in closed session to discuss the following item:

5.1. Subject: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) (One Case).

6. OPEN SESSION - REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION

The City Attorney will report on action taken in closed session.

7. ADJOURN TO REGULAR MEETING

Mayor Budge will closed session to the regular meeting.

8. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

Council Members Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge

Rancho Cordova City Council - AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting of Tuesday, January 17, 2023

9. METRO CABLE TV TELEVISION ANNOUNCEMENT

The Clerk will announce the meetings video recording and playback schedules.

10. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The Mayor will call on someone in attendance to lead the Pledge.

11. INVOCATION

Tammy Hartman with the Law Enforcement Chaplaincy Sacramento will give the invocation.

12. PRESENTATIONS

12.1. Presentation of Proclamation in Recognition of Retired Assemblyman Ken Cooley

13. PUBLIC COMMENT

Citizens wishing to address the Council for any matter not on the agenda may do so at this time via teleconference or by completing and submitting a Speaker Card to the City Clerk.

If you want to make a public comment via teleconference, please use the “raise hand” feature at the bottom center of the screen. If you are participating by telephone and you want to make a public comment, please press *9 to raise your hand. For those participating by Zoom or telephone, please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.

For items on the agenda, speakers will be called by the Mayor at the point on the agenda when the item will be heard. Speakers are encouraged to keep comments to three minutes or less and to state name and community of residence.

Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking immediate action on any item not on the agenda unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature or the need to take immediate action arose after the posting of the agenda.

14. COUNCIL REPORTS

15. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

16. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE

16.1. Subject: Meeting Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of January 3, 2023.

Recommendation: Adopt the Minutes.

16.2. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Contract No. 2022-281 with American Pavement Systems, Inc. in an Amount not to Exceed $943,772 for the Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment Project.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

16.3. Subject: A Resolution Declaring the City's Intention to Impose an Annual Stormwater Utility Fee for the Maintenance of Storm Drainage and Flood Protection Systems for the Rancho Cordova Storage Project.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution designating a time and place for hearing protests in connection with the annual Stormwater Utility Fee for the Rancho Cordova Storage project.

Rancho Cordova City Council - AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting of Tuesday, January 17, 2023

16.4. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute Construction Contract Amendment 2021-75-11 with Teichert Construction to Increase the Contract Amount from $11,949,145.95 to an Amount not to Exceed $12,440,317.95 for the Construction of White Rock Road - Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway Project.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

16.5. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment to On-Call Professional Services Agreement with Upavanti Inc. Increasing the On-Call Contract Amount from $100,000 to $1,500,000 to Provide Building Plan Review and Inspection Services.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution

16.6. Subject: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova and on Behalf of Commissions and Committees Created by the City Council Pursuant to Government Code Section 54952(b) Confirming the State of Emergency Under Government Code Section 8625, Recognizing Continued Measures to Promote Social Distancing, and Re-authorizing Remote Teleconference Meetings of the City for the Period from January 17, 2023 through February 16, 2023.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

17. CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE

17.1. Subject: A Resolution Approving the City of Rancho Cordova's Adjusted Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule for 2023.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution approving the Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule.

18. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

18.1. Subject: Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova Major Design Review - Project No. PLND-1021- 0015.

Recommendation: There is no staff recommendation at this time. Staff is providing a response to Council’s concerns that were raised at the December 5, 2022 Council meeting and responding to additional information from the applicant and the applicant’s attorney. Staff will be seeking additional direction from Council for this project. The public hearing will be continued to a future Council date. At that time, staff may bring back documents for possible final action based upon Council’s direction.

19. REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS

19.1. Subject: Residential Waste Collection and Street Sweeping Contract Options for the Term Beginning January 1, 2025.

Recommendation: Receive the presentation and provide direction to staff on the preferred option to develop and execute a new residential waste collection and street sweeping contract for the term beginning on January 1, 2025.

20. COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

21. ADJOURNMENT

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Special Meetings listed below are subject to change/cancellation without further notice.

Rancho Cordova City Council - AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting of Tuesday, January 17, 2023

Unless the Council adopts a motion to extend the meeting, any item that is not initiated before 11:00 p.m. will be continued to the next day at 5:30 p.m. or scheduled on the next regular meeting agenda of the Council.

Public documents related to items on the open session portion of this agenda, which are distributed to the City Council less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, shall be available for public inspection at the time the documents are distributed to the Council. Documents are available for inspection at the City Clerk's office located in Rancho Cordova City Hall.

The agenda items are accessible on the City’s website at www.cityofranchocordova.org on Thursdays or Fridays prior to the Regular City Council Meeting.

UPCOMING MEETINGS
January 24, 2023 1:00 PM Special Meeting/Work Session
January 25, 2023 1:00 PM Special Meeting/Work Session
February 6, 2023 3:00 PM Special Meeting/Regular Meeting February 21, 2023 5:30 PM Regular Meeting
February 28, 2023 5:30 PM Special Meeting/Work Session
March 6, 2023 4:00 PM Special Meeting/Regular Meeting
March 20, 2023 5:30 PM Regular Meeting
March 28, 2023 5:30 PM Special Meeting/Work Session
If you have any technical questions related to the agenda items, please contact City Hall at (916) 851- 8700.

The Rancho Cordova City Council meeting will be videotaped in its entirety and will be cablecast without interruption on Metro Cable 14, the Government Affairs Channel on the Comcast, Consolidated Communications and AT&T U-Verse Systems. Closed Captioning will be available on the playback cablecast. A DVD copy is available from the City Clerk’s Department and a webcast of this meeting will be available for viewing via video streaming from the City’s website within 48 hours of adjournment of this meeting.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 851-8720 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA
I, Stacy Leitner, City Clerk for the City of Rancho Cordova, declare that the foregoing agenda for the January 17, 2023 Regular Meeting of the Rancho Cordova City Council was posted and available for review on January 12, 2023 at City Hall of the City of Rancho Cordova, 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, California, 95670. The agenda is also available on the city website at www.cityofranchocordova.org.

Rancho Cordova City Council - AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting of Tuesday, January 17, 2023

Signed January 23, 2023 at Rancho Cordova, California.

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

ITEM 16.1.

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday, January 3, 2023
5:30 PM – Regular Meeting
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
Pursuant to California Assembly Bill 361 amending the Ralph M. Brown Act (Govt. Code 54950-54963), the City has declared a state of emergency relating to COVID-19 and imposed measures to promote social distancing.

DRAFT MINUTES

1. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

Mayor Budge called the Regular meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 5:39 p.m.

Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Adam Lindgren, Stacy Leitner, Persephonie Riley, and Micah Runner

2. METRO CABLE TV TELEVISION ANNOUNCEMENT

The City Clerk read the meetings recordings and playback schedule.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Micah Runner led the pledge.

4. INVOCATION

Mary Nobbe with the Law Enforcement Chaplaincy Sacramento gave the invocation.

5. PRESENTATIONS

ITEM 16.1.

Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Tuesday, January 3, 2023

5.1. Federal & State Legislative Updates

6. PUBLIC COMMENT

Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:

1. Kate Carroll

2. Sara Malone

3. Greg Muilenburg

4. Troy Fennel

5. James Garcia

6. Eric Winegar

7. Helen Whelan-Bashaw

8. Eric Winegar

9. Kate Carroll

10. James Garcia

11. Tony Hamilton

12. David and Barbara Williams
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.

7. COUNCIL REPORTS

Council reported on events since the last meeting.

8. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

City Manager Micah Runner gave his report.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE

Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers. Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.

ACTION: Motion to approve items 9.1 through 9.6 by Pulipati second by Gatewood; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.

9.1. Subject: Meeting Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of December 19, 2022.

Recommendation: Adopt the Minutes.

9.2. Subject: Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the Suncreek Specific Plan for the Trevor Gilmartin Project.

Recommendation: Waive second reading and adopt the Ordinance.

9.3. Subject: Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending The Ranch Special Planning Area- PLND-0722-0045-The Ranch Four Seasons.

Recommendation: Waive the second reading and adopt the Ordinance amending The Ranch Special Planning Area.

9.4. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Approve Contract No. 2022-263 with Torres Project Management, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $645,000 for the Suite 220 Tenant Improvement Project (CP23-2250).

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

9.5. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Contract Amendment No. 2019-65-2 with Willdan Engineering to Increase the Contract Amount from $1,450,000 to an Amount not to Exceed $2,250,000 with no Change in the Contract

ITEM 16.1.

Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Tuesday, January 3, 2023

Term.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

9.6. Subject: A Resolution Declaring the Results of a Mail Ballot Election Relating to the Imposition of the Annual Stormwater Utility Fee for the Sun Center Drive Warehouse Project in the City of Rancho Cordova.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution declaring the results of the mail ballot election relating to the imposition of the Annual Stormwater Utility Fee for the Sun Center Drive Warehouse project.

10. CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE

None.

11. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

11.1. Subject: Rancho Cordova Apartments - Major Design Review - Project No. PLND-0821- 0002 - Located at 11650 Douglas Road; APN: 067-0030-078.

Recommendation: Find the project exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15183, projects consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan or Zoning; and adopt the Resolution for a Major Design Review for Rancho Cordova Apartments.

Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:

1. James Garcia
BREAK 7:42 PM – 7:59 PM

2. Helen Whelan-Bashaw

3. Giovanni Ottolini
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.

ACTION: Motion to approve item 11.1 by Terry second by Gatewood; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.

12. REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS

12.1. Subject: 2022 California Legislative Update.

Recommendation: Receive update.

Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers. Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.

ACTION: Information was received regarding the 2022 California Legislative Update.

12.2. Subject: 2023 Legislative Advocacy Update and Platform.

Recommendation: Presentations by Simon and Company, Inc. and Joe A. Gonsalves & Son regarding key 2022 legislation affecting the city, as well as staff update regarding 2023 legislative priorities. Receive presentations and update; provide direction and/or approval to staff on city's 2023 Legislative Priorities.

Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers. Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.

ITEM 16.1.

Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Tuesday, January 3, 2023

ACTION: Motion to approve item 12.2 by Gatewood second by Pulipati; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.

12.3. Subject: Presentation on the Zinfandel Drive Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing Project Aesthetic Concept.

Recommendation: Receive staff presentation on the proposed Aesthetic Concept for the Zinfandel Drive Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing Project and provide direction.

Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:

1. Fayzah Mughal
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.

ACTION: Input was received regarding the Zinfandel Drive Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing Project Aesthetic Concept.

12.4. Subject: Discussion and Approval of Council Member Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees.

Recommendation: That Council confirms commitments to serve on other agency boards, commissions, and committees.

Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers. Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.

ACTION: Motion to approve item 12.4 by Sander second by Gatewood; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.

13. COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

None.

14. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION

Mayor Budge adjourned the meeting to closed session at 9:28 p.m.

15. CLOSED SESSION - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

Mayor Budge called closed session to order at 9:28 p.m.

Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Adam Lindgren and Micah Runner

16. CLOSED SESSION

Council will met in closed session to discuss the following item:

16.1. Subject: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION:

Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) (One Case).

17. OPEN SESSION - REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION

City Attorney Adam Lindgren reported that no reportable action was taken in closed session.

ITEM 16.1.

Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Tuesday, January 3, 2023

18. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Budge adjourned the meeting in memory of Regina Balaoing at 11:03 p.m. _____________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.2.

DATE: January 17, 2023

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2022-281 WITH AMERICAN PAVEMENT SYSTEMS,
INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $943,772 FOR THE RANCHO

CORDOVA SURFACE TREATMENT PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the City Manager to execute Contract No. 2022-281 with American Pavement Systems, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $943,772 for the Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment project.

BACKGROUND

City staff released a Request for Bids for the Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment project to perform minor pavement base repairs, apply a slurry seal, and install new pavement markings at the locations shown on site map as Attachment 4. The application of these pavement preservation treatments will improve safety and aesthetics and extend the useful life of the roadway.

Bids for this project were solicited on the City’s website, CIPList.com, the Rancho Cordova Chamber of Commerce, and the Sacramento, Placer and El Dorado County Builders Exchanges on November 4, 2022. Bids for the project were publicly opened on December 7, 2022. A total of six bids were received. The lowest responsible bid was in the amount of $943,772 from American Pavement Systems, Inc. The bid summary sheet is provided as Attachment 2.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

The contract would be funded by Measure A maintenance funds and has no impact to the general fund.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment Project Bid Summary

3. Contract No. 2022-281

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

4. Site Map

ITEM 16.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2022-281 WITH AMERICAN PAVEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $943,772 FOR THE RANCHO CORDOVA SURFACE TREATMENT PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City solicited bids for the Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment project under the requirements of state law on November 2, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the City publicly opened bids on December 7, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the lowest responsible bidder was American Pavement Systems, Inc; and

WHEREAS, the project will include minor pavement base repairs, a slurry seal, and new pavement markings in the South White Rock neighborhood and Prospect Park business area; and

WHEREAS, adoption of this Resolution will award construction contract No. 2022-281 to American Pavement Systems, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $943,772 for the Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment project; and

WHEREAS, the contract is funded by Measure A maintenance funds, and has no impact to the general fund; and

WHEREAS, the services will exceed the maximum amount the City Manager is authorized to approve.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute Contract No. 2022-281 with American Pavement Systems, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $943,772 in a form approved by the City Attorney for the Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 17th day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Linda Budge, Mayor

ITEM 16.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 2

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment Project
Rancho Cordova City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
December 7, 2022 - 11:00 A.M.

Letter
Designation Contractor Bid Grand Total
Cost
Form
Bid
Schedule
Contractor's
License
DIR
Form
Experience
Qualification
Employee
Qualifications
Designation
of Subs
Operations
Plan
Exceptions to
Agreement
Bid
Bond
Non-Collusion
Affidavit
Signature
Page
A Pavement Coatings Co. $1,092,395.00 X X X X X X X X X X X X B American Pavement Systems, Inc. $943,771.75 X X X X X X X X X X X X C Dryco $996,901.21 X X X X X X X X X X X X
D VSS International $1,037,385.35 X X X X X X X X X X X X E B&M Builders, Inc $1,209,380.00 X X X X X X X X X X X X F Sierra Nevada Co. $1,014,006.96 X X X X X X X X X X X X Attendees:

Victor Ramos, Operations and Maintenance Technician
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 2

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND AMERICAN PAVEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE RANCHO CORDOVA SURFACE TREATMENT PROJECT

THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into between the City of Rancho Cordova (“City”) and American Pavement Systems, Inc. (“Contractor”) as of January 17, 2023.

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the City Council for the City heretofore caused plans and specifications for the Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment Project (“Project”) to be prepared, and theref ore did approve and adopt said plans and specifications; and

WHEREAS, the City Coun cil for the City did cause to be published for the time and in the manner required by law, a notice inviting sealed bids for the performance of said work; and

WHEREAS, the notice was published on November 2, 2022 on the City of Rancho Cordova website and on CIPList.com (“Notice”); and

WHEREAS, the Contractor, in response to such Notice, submitted to the City Council for the City within the time specified in said Not ice, and in the manner provided for therein, a sealed bid for the performance of the Project specified in said plans and specificati ons, which said bid and proposal, and other bids and proposals submitted in response to said Notice, the City Council opened and canvassed in the manner provided by law; and

WHEREAS, the Contractor was the lowest responsible bidder for the performance of said Project, and said City Council for the City as a result of the canvass of said bids, did determine and declare Contractor to be the lowest responsible bidder for said Project and award to a contract therefore.

NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of th e promises herein, it is mutually agreed between the parties hereto as follows:

Section 1. CONTRACT DO
CUMENTS. The following documents are by this reference incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement: The County of Sacramento, Standard Construction Specifications dated January 2016; the Special Provisions; the contract drawings, all addenda; the Notice to Contractors ; the Proposal; all required bonds; and all supplemental Agreements covering alterations, amendments, or extensions to the contract. The documents which describe the work to be performed are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “Plans and Specifications”.

Section 2. SCOPE
OF WORK . The Contractor will furnish all labor, materials, services, transportation, appliances, and mechanical workmanship required for Contract No. 2022-281 as provided for and set forth in said Plans and Specifications, which are h ereby incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. All of the work done under this Agreement shall be under the supervision of and be performed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director of the City of Rancho Cordova who shall have the right to reject any and all materials and supplies furnished by the Contractor which do not comply with the Plans and Specifications, together with the right to require the Contractor to replace any and all work furnished by ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

the Contractor which shall not either in w orkmanship or material be in strict accordance with the Plans and Specifications.

Section 3. COMPL ETION. Agreement shall be effective from the time at which the contract is fully executed through June 30, 2023, as described in Section 2.4 of the attached.

Section 4. PAYMENT. Attached hereto as Exhibit A and by reference incorpated, is the bid and proposal of Contractor. Said bid and proposal will contain, as required by the terms of said specifications, the full and complete schedule of the different items with the lump sums or unit prices as so specified. The City agrees in consideration of the work to be performed for the Project herein and subject to the terms and conditions thereof, to pay Contractor all sums of money which may become due to Contractor in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid bid and proposal, and this Agreement. Said sum shall be paid in accordance with Section 8 of the Standard Specifications. Actual payment will be based upon the quantities as measured in the field. No payment made under this Agreement shall be construed to be an acceptance of defective work or improper materials. The total contract amount is set at a not to exceed amount of $943,772 for he term of this Agreement.

Section 5. PREVAI
LING WAGES. T o the exte nt requi red by law, Contractor and all of the Contractor’s subcontractors shall comply with California Health and Safety Code Section 33422.1, and shall comply with California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq. and all regulations adopted pursuant thereto (referred to herein as, “Prevailing Wage Laws”), and be responsible for carrying out the requirements of such provisions. Pursuant to the provisions of Articles 1 and 2 of Chapter 1, Part 7, Division II, of the Labor Code of the State of California, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holidays and overtime work, for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Project contemplated under this Agreement shall be paid to all workers, laborers and mechanics employed in the execution of said Project by Contractor, or by any subcontractor doing or contracting to do any part of said Project. The appropriate determination of the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations is filed with, and available for inspection at 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670, the office of the Clerk of the City. Contractor shall post, at each job site, a copy of such prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director for the California Department of Industrial Relations. The Contractor shall, and hereby agrees to, unconditionally indemnify, reimburse, defend, protect and hold harmless the City and its elective and appointive boards, commi ssions, officers, agents, attorneys, consultants and employees, and all of their respective successors and assigns, from and against any and all claims, demands, suits and actions at law or in equity, and losses, liabilities, expenses, penalties, fines, orders, judgments, injunctive or other relief, and costs and damages of every kind, nature and description (including but not limited to attorneys’ fees and court costs; with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), and administrative, enforcement or judicial proceedings, whether known or unknown, and which directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, are caused by, arise from, or relate to, or are alleged to be caused by, arise from, or relate to, the payment or requirement of payment of prevailing wages or the requirement of competitive bidding in the constructi on of the Project, the failure to comply with any state or federal labor laws, regulations or standards in connection with this Agreement, including but not limited to California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq. and the Prevailing Wage Laws, or any act or omission of the City or the Contractor related to this Agreement with respect to the payment or requirement of payment of prevailing wages or the requirement of competitive bidding, whether or not any insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any such claims, demands, suits, actions, losses, liabilities, expenses, penalties, fines, orders, judgments, injunctive or other relief, costs, damages, or administrative, enforcement or judicial proceedings. It is further agreed ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

that the City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against the Contractor which they may have by reason of this indemnity and hold harmless agreement because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City by the Contractor, of any of the insurance policies described in this Agreement.

Section 6. INSURANCE. The C
ontractor shall carry and maintain for the duration of the term of this Agreement, such public liability, property damage and c ontractual liability, auto, worker's compensation, and builders' risk insurance as required by the specifications.

Section 7. WORKERS
’ COMPENSATION CERTIFICATION. By e xecution of this Agreement , the Contractor certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the pr ovis ions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before c ommencing the performance of the work of this contract.”

Section 8. PERFO RMANCE AND PAYMENT BO NDS. The Contractor shall, before beginning said work for the Project, file two (2) bonds with the City, each made payable to the City. These bonds shall be issued by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of California and shall be maintained during the entire life of the Agreement at the expense of the Contractor. One bond shall be in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Agreement and shall g uarantee the faithful performance of the Agreement. The second bond shall be the payment bond required by California Civil Code Section 3247 et seq., and shall be in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Agreement. Any alterations made in the specifications which are a part of this Agreement or in any provision of this Agreement shall not operate to release any surety from liability on any bond required hereunder and the consent to make such alterations is hereby given, and any surety on said bonds hereby waives the provisions of California Civil Code Sections 2819 and 2845.

Section 9. INDEMNI
FICATION.

9.1 Contractor’s Performance . To t he fullest extent permi tted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its governing Board, officers, directors, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, and all costs incidental thereto, including cost of defense, settlement, arbitration, and reasonable attorneys' fees arising out of, pertaining to, or resulting from the acts or omissions of anyone else directly or indirectly acting on behalf of the Contractor, or for which the Contractor is legally liable under law, regardless of whether caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder.

9.2 PERS Indem
nification. In t he event that Contractor or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Contractor providing Services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction of the California Publ ic Emplo yees Retirement System (“PERS”) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any and all employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Contractor or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City, and any attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the City to enforce this Section.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

9.3 No Limitation of Liability for Indemnification. The indemnities set forth in this Section shall not be limited by the insurance requirements set forth in the Contract.

Section 10. NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY . The Contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of a person’s race, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, against any employee or applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontract, or participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in employment, contracting, and the provision of any services that are the subject of this Agreement, including, but not limited to the satisfaction of any positive obligations required of Contract or thereby. Contractor shall include the provisions of this section in any subcontract approved by the City.

Section 11. MISC
ELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

11.1 This Agreement shall bind and inure to the heirs, devisees, assignees, and successors in interest of Contractor and to the successors in interest of Contractor in the same manner as if such parties had been expressly named herein. All times stated herein or in the contract documents are of the essence hereof. As used in this instrument the singular includes the plural, and the masculine includes the feminine and the neuter. This Agreement may create a possessory interest subject to property taxation, and Contractor may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest.

11.2 Contrac
t Ad ministration. This Agreement shall be administered by Operations & Maintenance Division Manager ("Contract Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Contract Administrator or his or her designee.

11.3 Notices. Any w ritten notice to Contractor shall be sent to:

Gregory Reed
American Pavement Systems, Inc.
1012 11
th Street, Suite 1000
Modesto, CA 95354
[email protected]

Any written notice to City shall be sent to:

Victor Ramos
City of Rancho Cordova
O&M Division
3303 Luyung Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742

11.4 IRS Form W-9. Con
tractor shall complete and submit Internal Revenue Service Form W -9 to the City before execution of this Agreement. The City’s Finance Director shall have authority to waive this requirement.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the City Cou ncil and Contractor have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA: CONTRACTOR:

Micah Runner, City Manager Gregory B. Reed, President

Date Date

Attest:

Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk

Date

Approved as to Form:

Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney

Date

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

SECTION 2

SCOPE OF SERVICES

2.1 WORK GUIDANCE
All work to be done by any Bidder selected to perform the work outlined in this RFB shall be guided by the:

• County of Sacramento, Municipal Services, Standard Construction Specifications https://saccountyspecs.saccounty.gov/Pages/default.aspx

• Standard Specifications, State of California, California State Transportation Agency , Department of Transportation
http://ppmoe.dot.thca.gov/hq/esc/oe /construction_contract_standards/std_specs/2018_StdSp ecs/2018_StdSpecs.pdf

and this RFB, herein referred to as Special Provisions.

A complete, preliminary copy of the City ’s contract for Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment Project is attached to this RFB as Appendix A. The contract shall bind selected B idder to perform work in accordance with this RFB.

2.2 DESCRIPTION OF WORK STANDARDS
All Bidders accept and confirm by submission of a signed bid in response to this RFB , that work to be performed by the selected Contractor is comprised of a slurry seal on:

1. Zinfandel Drive from White Rock Rd to International Drive

2. Gold Center Drive from Zinfandel Drive to Prospect Park Drive

3. Prospect Park Drive from White Rock Road to White Rock Road

4. Data Drive from Zinfandel Drive to International Drive

5. Capital Center Drive from White Rock Road to International Drive

6. Quality Drive from White Rock Road to International Drive

7. Basie Way from Brubeck Drive to Brubeck Drive

8. Brubeck Drive from Reserve Drive to Basie Way

9. Dixieland Way from Basie Way to Basie Way

10. Mardi Gras Court from Basie Way to North-ending

11. Moonglow Drive from Reserve Drive to Basie Way

12. Ragtime Circle from Brubeck Drive to Brubeck Drive

13. Reserve Drive from Data Drive to International Drive

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Requests for Bids for:

Rancho Cordova
Surface Treatment Project
City of Rancho Cordova
Department of Public Works
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
ADDENDUM #1
Original RFB Release Date: November 4, 2022
Bid Opening: December 7, 2022, 11:00 A.M.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

The City r
equires the selected Bidder to meet the following minimum standards:

Workmanship: All mat erials and workmanship shall be of a quality that is equal or superior to any similar work considered by surface treatment contractors to be best practice. All wor k completed by selected Contractor shall be subject to inspection prior to payment being authorized. All work shall be conducted in a manner that least interferes with operation and public usage of the streets and sidewalks.

Safety: All services, supplies and equipment must comply with the California Safety Division of Industrial Safety Orders and O.S.H.A. The Contractor shall plan and conduct the work in a manner that will safeguard all persons from injury and shall take all precauti ons required by applicable regulations of the State Department of Industrial Regulations. The Contractor’s employees shall always wear O.S.H.A. approved safety vests during contract work.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

Haz
ards and Vandalism: An y hazards or acts of vandalism shall be reported immediately to the Contract Manager, or their designee, and then followed up in writing. Hazards shall be remedied by the Contractor after approval is obtained from the Contract Manager, or their designee.

Hazards which create life -threatening situations or potential for bodily harm shall be remedied immediately by the Contractor.

Equipment: Selec
ted Contractor must furnish all tools, and equipment needed to provide a high level of workmanship, to ensure continuous and safe operation, and complete work in accordance with the current City and standard specifications. City may require demonstration of equipment during selection process of this RFB, as outlined in Section 5, Bidder Experience and Operations Plan.

2.3 CO

MMENCEMENT OF WORK
Bidders acknowledge that submittal of bid does not constitute any acceptance of work by the City.

Additionally, the receipt of award of contract to any Bidder shall not constitute any authority to enter upon sites for work. Work shall commence only upon formal execution of a contract and work orders from the City.

The City seeks to make selection of a Contractor and execute a contract for the Rancho Cordova Surface Treatment Project b y December 19, 2022 . Bidders acknowledge that they are prepared to execute a contract and begin prosecuting work within this time. Any Bidder unable to meet this timeframe shall not be considered for award.

2.4 TERM OF AGREEMENT
Any Contract resulting from subject bid is expected to be completed by June 30, 2023.

Failure of the Contractor to diligently prosecute the work as defined herein will be considered as grounds for termination of the contract.

Failure to provide an adequate working force shall be considered as grounds for the termination of the contract.

The executed contract relating to this RFB may be terminated by the City, at its discretion, upon thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice addressed to the last known address of the Contractor. In the event of

such termination, the Contractor shall be paid for all work successfully completed up to the effective date of such termination.

2.5 SUBCONTRACTORS
Bidders requiring the provision of additional services from subcontractors acknowledge that all proposed subcontractors shall adhere to the same standards of work as described in this RFB . Bidders further acknowledge that the selected Contractor shall be require d to perform, with the Contractor ’s own organization and employees, not less than fifty percent (50%) of the value of all work conducted under executed contract.

Any Bidder submitting bids for work that includes the use of subcontractors shall additionally submit a filled-out Section 5.6, Designation of Subcontractors.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

2.6 AD

DITIONAL SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Further special provisions guiding the execution of a contract for surface treatment are fully described in Appendix C, Additional Special Provisions. The additional special provisions as described in Appendix C include items such as Prevailing Wage, Payroll Records, Traffic Management, Regulations of Work, Payment, and other additional special provisions. Bidders’ attention is directed to review of these Additional Special Provisions as they will be made part of the contract to be executed by the selected Contractor.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

Amci·ic.111 Pavcme11t Systen.1
£.\pt;.•J-i(rllCf! 4ist
Scctinus ;$. I Ii. . G. J fl.ff li.S amt;
...
no ,.,
....
°"" ... ..,._ CM"-'-,l'llf"'II
7,0
.

7.l-l,1,IS 7.11
.
'f,10 7,1 7,7
l-"-Dfr..""''-1 "'"'"11'•"""'-"""""'""--l--""'=--l-"--''"--,,...-,-"I-L-'",...4-'-_..._.,-..___IJ,..,!!, .. .- .._.=a-f -"" ""''"i-- -'-" """'un. · -- -1 -_.,===--+---L--l--'- -l-"'-'--l--'-l--"" ""-l--'...__-l-'..., .._.-.+'...,.._.- .+-'l!!l.! "-" "-I .UJc eomm-.. ,1"""''!":" S>t••"l'l"'b.Jlm,n
... _
pnlf�/l'f<IJ«I
....... fr,n<lll'nnop,ol
ilinrw-,.'l'foje<I
µ-,.-..., , ..... ..,.,,•,,.,-1=="'"''""""'---P-""-'·'>..j•.L..O-.,_.,.."""-l,·.,__,,,.. ....,,...""-li-<""...,- ._•_-_'4 .,.. ,...,«l-- --'= '- - --l·----=- " = ·+- -"-• -l----•'--+ -""-l--"'"-I W. '-'" '-l--' = - + -"' """ -l--- - -•-._+ ...., ,.._. "'--I . -· . . -·
-· -·
.• , ..
_ ........ --· -·
u···
,.
- -
- ....
. ..... -· .. u
....
,. "'""'-1-'--...lliOOl"j--"-'L.-1'"""".._--l-"'-""'-">j----""'=-"'----l-_,....._"--"""-+--'"'--l-_._-f-'""--l-.>IU-l-...., l---",._- c:""'c-' -/--"'•mffl • b-l..J""-'..,..'-j �lt1<lla<»rd S.Nor
HUJWSM
0 OJI t!.,,..Wlt-=«N:M .........
·"'······
.... -Juw. -iw• ·=··--u,,,ou. ___ +.....,,.,.u..1->-_,,,,,.,_µ.=""'+--..._-i"'_,_.._-l-,,...= --"""-'""".,'--+-""-=""'--l--''---I--.._ "-1--"'Y--'"'--i-'""''-l---""'--l---"= -i--'"'""-'"""--l--'-=•--c,.;·.,,y ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

APPENDIX B

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Without limiting Contractor’s indemnification, Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the agreement by the Contractor , his agents, representatives or employees. City shall retain the right at any time to review the coverage, form, and amount of the insurance required hereby. If in the opinion of the City ’s Risk Manager the insurance provisions in these requirements do no t provide adequate protection for City and for members of the public, City may require Contractor to obtain insurance sufficient in coverage, form and amount to provide adequate protection. City’s requirements shall be reasonable but shall be imposed to as sure protection from and against the kind and extent of risks that exist at the time a change in insurance is required.

VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE
Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates evidencing coverage required below. Copies of required endorsements must be attached to provided certificates. The City ’s Risk Manager may approve self- insurance programs in lieu of required policies of insurance if, in the opinion of the Risk manager, the interests of the City and the general public are adequately protected. All certificates or evidences of self- insurance are to be received and approved by the City before performance commences. The City reserves the right to require that the Contractor provide complete, certified copies of any policy of insurance offered in compliance with these specifications. As an alternative to insurance certificates, the Contractor’s insurer may voluntarily provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements, effecting the coverage required by these specifications.

MINIMUM SCOPE OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. GENERAL LIABILITY: Insurance Services Office ’s Commercial General Liability occurrence coverage form CG 0001. Including, but not limited to Premises/Operations, Products/Completed Operations, and Personal & Advertising Injury, without exclusions or limitations unless approved by City Risk Manager.

2. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY: Insurance Services Office’s Commercial Automobile Liability coverage form CA 0001, auto coverage symbol “1” (any auto). If there are no owned or leased vehicles, symbols 8 and 9 for non-owned and hired autos shall apply.

3. WORKER’S COMPENSATION: Statutory requirements of the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance.

4. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY or Errors and Omissions Liability insurance appropriate to the Contractor’s profession.

5. UMBRELLA or Excess Liability policies are acceptable where the need for higher liability limits is noted in the Minimum Limits of Insurance and shall provide liability coverages that at least follow form over the underlying insurance requirements where necessary for Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability, Employer’s Liability, and any other liability coverage designated under the Minimum Scope of Insurance.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

MIN

IMUM LIMITS OF INSURANCE
Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:

1. General Liability shall be on an Occurrence basis (as opposed to Claims Made basis). Minimum limits and structure shall be:

General Aggregate: $2,000,000
Products Comp/Op Aggregate: $2,000,000
Personal & Adv. Injury: $1,000,000
Each Occurrence: $1,000,000
Fire Damage: $ 100,000

Building Trades Contractors and Contractors engaged in other projects of construction shall have their general liability Aggregate Limit of Insurance endorsed to apply separately to each job site or project, as provided for by Insurance Services Office form CG-2503 Amendment-Aggregate Limits of Insurance (Per Project).

2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Worker’s Compensation: Statutory.

4. Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

5. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.

DEDUCTIBLES AND SELF-INSURED RETENTION
Any deductibles or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respect the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.

CLAIMS MADE ON PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
If professional liability coverage is written on a Claims Made form:

1. The “Retro Date” must be shown and must be on or before the date of the Agreement or the beginning of the Agreement performance by Contractor.

2. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least one (1) year after completion of the Agreement.

3. If coverage is cancelled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims made policy form with a “Retro Date” prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of one (1) year after completion of the Agreement.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

OTH

ER INSURANCE PROVISIONS
The insurance policies required in this Agreement are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, as applicable, the following provisions:

1. ADDITIONAL INSURED STATU S: The City, its officers, directors, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be endorsed as additional insured as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied, or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no endorsed limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, directors, officials, employees, or volunteers. Applicable to General Liability, use ISO form CG 2010 11-85 only, and Auto Liability Policies.

2. PRIMARY INSURANCE: F
or any claims related to this agreement, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be endorsed to be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City, its officers, directors, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. Applicable to General Liability and Auto Liability policies.

3. FAILURE TO COMPLY : Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, directors, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. Applies to policies in which the City is named as an additional insured.

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST : Th e C
ontractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer ’s liability. Applicable to General Liability and Auto Liability policies.

5. MAINTENANCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE: The Contractor shall maintain all insurance coverages in place at all times and provide the City with evidence of each policy’s renewal ten (10) days in advance of its anniversary date. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party, reduced in coverage, or reduced in limits, except after thirty (30) days’ written notice for cancellation or sixty (60) days’ written notice for non-renewal has been given to the City. For non -payment of premium 10 days ’ prior written notice of cancellation, certified mail, return receipt requested is required. Applicable to all policies.

6. WORKER’S COMPENSATION WAIVER OF SUBROGATION: The
worker’s compensation policy required
hereunder shall be endorsed to state that the worker’s compensation carrier waives its right of subrogation against the City, its officers, directors, officials, employees, agents or volunteers, which might arise by reason of payment under such policy in connection with performance under this Agreement by the Contractor.

7. PROPERTY WAIVER OF SUBROGATION : C
ourse of construction policies shall contain the following provisions:

1. The C
ity shall be named as loss payee.

2. The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against the City.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

8. CIVIL CODE PRO VISION: Coverage shall not extend to any indemnity coverage for the active negligence of the additional insured in any case where an agreement to indemnity the additional insured would be invalid under Subdivision (b) of Section 2782 of the Civil Code.

9. ACCEPTABILITY OF INSURERS: I n surance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best ’s rating of no less than A- VII. The City Risk Manager may waive or alter this requirement, or accept self-insurance in lieu of any required policy of insurance if, in the opinion of the Risk Manager, the interests of the City and the general public are adequately protected.

10. SUBCONTRACTORS: C ONTRACTOR shall require all subcontractors to maintain adequate insurance.

Subcontractors shall name the CONTRACTOR as additional insured on their General Liability policies.

CONTRACTOR shall maintain copies of certificates of insurance and additional insured endorsements as provided by its subcontractors. All subcontractors shall be subject to all terms and conditions stated herein.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

APPENDIX C

ADDITIONAL SPECIAL PROVISIONS

C.1) PAYROLL RECORDS
Attention is directed to Section 1776 of the Labor Code of the State of California. Regulations complementing said Section 1776 are located in Section 16000 and Sections 16400 through 16403 of Title 8, California Administrative Code. The Contractor is required to comply with the provisions of Section 1776 of said Labor Code. The Contractor shall also be responsible for compliance by their subcontractors.

C.2) PREVAILING WAGE
See Section 5 in Appendix A.

C.3) WORK ON/AROUND PRIVATE PROPERTY
Attention is directed to Section 13 -1.01, “Preservation of Property ” of the Standard Construction Specifications and these Special Provisions.

The Contractor shall take every precaution to protect all public and private property during the performance of this contract. Any damages caused by the Contractor ’s personnel or equipment will promptly be repaired to the condition existing before the damage. If, in the opinion of the Contract Manager, repair is not possible, the damaged facilities will be replaced in kind and size. All costs for such repairs or replacements shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor. Damages to City facilities due to the Contractor ’s lack of performance in accordance with these specifications are the Contractor’s responsibility.

During the contract period, the Contractor will not unreasonably interfere with business operations within the project limits or unreasonably delay access to or from private residential driveways. The Contractor shall not be allowed to impact or restrict use of any residential or business driveways for more than two (2) consecutive working days. During the time in which residential or business driveways are impacted, the opposite side of the street shall be left free of obstructions and available for parking outside of the working hours. Residential and business driveways shall not be impacted without prior approval from the Contract Manager on any Saturday, Sunday, or holidays.

Three (3) calendar days prior to beginning work on this project, the Contractor shall be required to notify adjacent or nearby residents/businesses. Residents/businesses shall be notified with a City-approved door hanger. The Contractor shall be responsible for inserting the date on which a section of street will be impacted by construction. The door hangers will advise residents /businesses of parking and irrigation restrictions during and immediately in advance of the construction of proposed improvements. Any changes in the Contractor ’s schedule shall require that re -notification take place at the Contractor ’s expense. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to obtain, at his expense, City-approved door hangers.

Door hangers shall be placed before 1:00 p.m. three (3) days before beginning work to allow sufficient time for City inspection of the hangers.

The Contractor shall post “No Parking” signs on barricades 48 hours prior to restricting parking on any street within the project area. The “ No Parking” signs shall also include the date(s) of the exact working day(s) that the work will take place. A warning indicating that vehicles will be towed away at the owner’s expense shall also be included on the “No Parking” signs. In addition, the Contractor shall make available a 24 -hour telephone number in case of emergencies and/or problems and shall post the telephone number on the “No Parking” signs. The Contractor shall be responsible for placing temporary “No Parking” ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

sign
s in advance of any construction activity. Barricades shall be placed a maximum of 500 feet apart, on both sides of the affected street. In the event that vehicles need to be towed the Contractor shall assume responsibility.

The Contractor shall not be allowed to begin work until the residents /businesses within the work area have been notified. The Contractor shall submit to the City Engineer the street addresses, the time, and the date the notices were placed prior to commencing work. The Contractor is responsible for providing on the notice the Contractor’s contact phone number(s) to be reached by the residents/businesses after hours and on weekends.

Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this Section shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various Contract items of work, and no separate payment will be made, therefore.

C.4) TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE
The Contractor’s attention is directed to Section 7- 1.04, “Public Safety, ” and Section 12, “Temporary Traffic Control,” of the Standard Specifications, the Uniform Manual of Traffic Control Devices (the latest edition of the California Supplement), and these Special Provisions.

Typically, a minimum of one (1) traffic lane (not less than 3.66 m (12 feet wide), per direction, shall be allowed for closure during construction activity, or as defined within the approved traffic control plan. All other traffic lanes shall be open for public vehicular traffic at all times during non -construction activity.

No work that interferes with public traffic shall be performed between 3:30 p.m. and 8:30 a.m. except work required under Section 7 -1.03, “Public Convenience, ” and Section 7 -1.04, “Public Safety ” or by special approval of the Contract Manager.

Prior to performing any work, under this contract the Contractor shall prepare and submit a Traffic Control Plan (TCP) to the Contract Manager for review. Note: To avoid delays, the Contractor is encouraged to submit in advance, several standard TCP’s covering the most common maintenance situations anticipated, prior to the start of the contract period. ALL night work (if any) re quires a MANDATORY TCP, for each occurrence.

If traffic controls are required for any operation under this contract to ensure the safety of workers and the public, a TCP must be submitted to the Contract Manager four (4) working days in advance of performing said operation. The Contractor must receive written approval from the Contract Manager prior to implementing any traffic controls and notify Police, and Fire at least twenty -four (24) hours in advance of implementing the traffic controls. Review and approval of a TCP by the Contract Manager, or is based upon general conformance with Federal, State, and local regulations and standards and does not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for the safety of its workers and the public.

If any component in the Contractor ’s traffic control system is displaced, damaged, or ceases to operate correctly, from any cause, during the life of the work, the Contractor shall immediately repair said component to its original condition or replace said component and shall restore the component to its original location, noncompliance may result in work stoppage by the Contract Manager.

The Contract Manager shall review and approve all TCPs on the basis of general conformance with applicable regulations and standards. Such review and approval of a TCP does not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for public and worker safety.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

Full c
ompensation for conforming to the requirements of this Section shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various Contract items of work, and no separate payment will be made, therefore.

C.5) REGULATIONS AND CONDUCT OF WORK
The Contractor shall plan and conduct the work to comply with local, State, and Federal gov ernment agencies’ applicable rules, regulations, codes, and ordinances to adequately safeguard persons and property from injury. The Contractor shall direct the performance of the work in compliance with reasonable safety regulations and work practices, and with applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations including but not limited to “Occupational Safety and Health Standards” promulgated by the U.S. Secretary of Labor, and Safety Orders of the California Division of Industrial Safety.

C.6) PERSONNEL
All work shall be performed by qualified and trained personnel with a minimum of two (2) years of experience in surface treatment maintenance. Experience must include use of typical tools and operation of commonly used equipment. All workers shall be neat and orderly in appearance.

C.7) SUPERVISION
The Contractor shall provide a competent superintendent during all times that work is being performed with the authority to represent and act for the Contractor in any matter pertaining to this contract. The Contractor shall furnish the names of all such superintendents to the Contract Manager prior to the commencement of this contract and further advise of any changes.

C.8) DISMISSAL OF UNSATISFACTORY EMPLOYEES
The Contractor shall only furnish workers who are competent and skilled for work under this contract. If, in the opinion of the Contract Manager, an employee of the Contractor is incompetent or disorderly, refuses to perform in accordance with the contract specifications, threatens or uses abusive language while on City property, does not meet safety requirements or is otherwise unsatisfactory, that employee shall be removed from all work under this contract. Contractor shall remove an unsatisfactory employee from contract sites immediately following notification.

C.9) PAYMENT
Attention is directed to Section 8, “Measurement and Payment, ” of the Standard Construction Specifications. The following shall be substituted with regard to invoicing procedure.

The Contractor’s invoice shall include:
• Invoice Number
• Invoice Date
• City’s Contract Number
• Period Service Provided (Date from – Date to)
• A breakdown of the work performed that includes quantity, unit cost, and total cost

Billing shall be submitted to the following address:

City of Rancho Cordova
Public Works Department
3303 Luyung Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
ATTN: Victor Ramos

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

C.1
0) WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENT
For work deemed by the Contract Manager as not meeting the requirements of the specifications, the City shall withhold payments or percentages thereof for work not completed, or until work is completed as per contract specifications. The City shall withhold payments or percentages thereo f for work that is not completed on schedule.

C.11) FAILURE TO PERFORM
If the Contractor, or his representative, fails to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of this contract, the Contract Manager will specify the reasons and locations as applicable by written correspondence. Failure by the Contractor to correct any deficiencies within one (1) calendar week of notification may result in withholding of payment. Failure by the Contractor to correct any deficiencies within two (2) calendar weeks or more may result in a formal written warning (60 -day Notice) to the Contractor specifying that such deficiencies must be corrected. Failure by the Contractor to correct such deficiencies within the 60-day specified time period may result in the termination of this contract.

In the event of termination, the City shall be liable only for payment of those services performed and accepted by the City prior to the date of termination. Any damages to property caused by the Contractor’s inability to meet specification shall be recovered by withholding payments. The Contractor and his surety shall be liable and assessed for any and all costs for the re -procurement of the contract services and damages to City facilities or plant materials.

C.12) INSPECTION
The Contractor might receive an inspection report from the Contract Manager. This form will indicate any deficiencies in the work performance of the Contractor. The Contract Manager may inform the Contractor by telephone of urgent deficiencies for immediate attention or repairs. Inspection by City staff might occur the following day the Contractor has serviced the areas.

The lack of inspections by the City st aff does not relieve the Contractor of his obligations to provide services as required by these specifications. Lack of receipt of inspection reports does not relieve the Contractor of his duties to provide services as required by these specifications.

C.13) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARD TERMS & CONDITIONS
You agree to be bound by our standard contract conditions, a sample of which is attached to this RFB (Appendix A), and to all other terms and conditions in this RFB.

C.14) INSURANCE
The Contractor, upon being notifi ed of being awarded the contract, shall have their Certificate of Insurance delivered to the City of Rancho Cordova Public Works Department, 3303 Luyung Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742, Attn: Victor Ramos. The Contractor’ s insurance shall comply with all insurance requirements as shown in Appendix B. No goods or services shall be rendered by the Contractor until a valid Certificate of Insurance is on file with the City of Rancho Cordova.

C.15) INDEMNITY
The Contractor indemnifies the City as stated in Section 9 of Appendix A.

C.16) TERMINATION
Any contract resulting from this RFB may be canceled by either party upon thirty (30) calendar days advance notice in writing.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

C.1
7) CODES AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
(a) All reference to codes, specifications, and standards in the contract documents shall mean, and are intended to be, the latest editions, amendments, and/or revisions of such reference documents in effect, as of the date of this contract.

(b) Authorities shall apply the minimum work requirements available to any work done for this project. Nothing described in these contract documents shall be construed to permit work not conforming to the most stringent of applicable codes and regulations.

(c) When contract documents call for materials or construction of better quality or larger size than required by applicable codes, laws, rules or regulations, the contract documents shall take precedence.

C.18) SOUND CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
Sound control shall conform to the provisions in Section 12-1.09 B, “Noise” of the Standard Construction Specifications.

The noise level from the Contractor’s operations, between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., shall not exceed 86 dbA at a distance of 15 m (50 feet). Said noise level requirement shall apply to all equipment on the work or related to the work, including but not limited to trucks, transit mixers or transient equipment that may or may not be owned by the Contractor. The use of loud soun d signals shall be avoided in favor of light warnings except those required by safety laws for the protection of personnel.

Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the contract prices paid for the various contract items of work involved, and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.

C.19) COOPERATION
Attention is directed to Section 5- 5, “Cooperation with Other Entities, ” of the Standard Construction Specifications. The Contractor shall notify United Service Alert (USA) prior to commencing any excavation:

Underground Service Alert (USA) – 811.

C.20) PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
Public convenience shall conform to the provisions in Section 7 -1.03, “Public Convenience, ” of the Standard Specifications. The Contractor shall limit his operations to weekdays between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. unless otherwise approved by the Contract Manager.

No work will commence before 8:30 a.m. on the City ’s main arterial and co llector street without prior written approval by the Contract Manager.

Temporary closure of driveways may be allowed subject to the advance written approval of the affected property owners and the Contract Manager. Prior to the closure of a driveway, the Contractor shall coordinate and notify the property owner at least twice of such closure. The Contractor shall deliver closure notices to residents and operators of commercial properties seventy-two (72) hours prior to each closure, (twenty-four (24) hour notice for emergency repairs).

It is the Contractor ’s responsibility to provide and accommodate all residents, operators of commercial properties, and property owners’ specific needs for driveway and pedestrian access at all times.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

Full c
ompensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the contract prices paid for the various contract items of work involved, and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.

C.21) OBSTRUCTIONS
Attention is directed to the presence of overhead and underground utilities in the construction sites. The Contractor shall exercise due caution in performing work so as not to damage the utilities. The work specified shall be so conducted by the Contractor as to permit the utility companies to maintain their services without interruption. Utilities which are to remain in place shall be worked around and protected from damage or interruption of service. The Contractor shall coordinate his work with the utility companies where utilities are to be relocated or set to grade.

Construction area signs shall be furnished, installed, maintained, and removed when no longer required by the Contractor following the provisions in Section 12, “Safety, Public Convenience, and Traffic Control,” of the Standard Construction Specifications.

Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this S ection shall be considered as included in the contract prices paid for the various contract items of work involved, and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.

C.22) WATER POLLUTION CONTROL
Water pollution control work shall conform to the requirements in Section 13, “Water Pollution Control,” of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions.

As part of the water pollut ion control work, a Water Pollution Control Program, hereafter referred to as the “WPCP,” is required for this contract. The WPCP shall be prepared in accordance with the State ’s Storm Water Quality Handbooks, SWPPP and WPCP Preparation Manual, current addition.

Implementation, inspection, maintenance, and modification of the WPCP shall be in accordance with the States’s Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Construction Site Best Management Practice Field Manual and Trouble Shooting Guide, current addition.

Copies of the above State handbooks may be obtained from the Department of Transportation, Material Operations Branch, Publication Distribution Unit, 1900 Royal Oaks Drive, Sacramento, California 95815.

The Contractor shall become fully informed of and comply with the applicable provisions of the Handbook and Federal, State, and local regulations that govern the Contractor’s operations and storm water discharges from both the project site and areas of disturbance outside the project limits during construction.

Unless arrangements for disturbance of areas outside the project limits are made by the City and made part of the contract, it is expressly agreed that the City assumes no responsibility to the Contractor or property owner whatsoever with respect to any arrangements made between the Contractor and property owner to allow disturbance of areas outside the project limits.

The Contractor shall be responsible for the costs and for any liability imposed by law as a result of the Contractor’s failure to comply with the requirements set forth in this section “Water Pollution Control,” including, but not limited to, compliance with the applicable provisions of the Handbook and Federal, State, and local regulations. For the purposes of this paragraph, costs and liabilities include but are not ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

limite
d to fines, penalties, and damages whether assessed against the City or the Contractor, including those levied under the Federal Clean Water Act and the State Porter Cologne Water Quality Act.

Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work involved, and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.

C.23) QUANTITIES
The quantities shown in the Bid Schedule are given to provide Bidders with an indication of potential work and the order of magnitude and scope of work. The actual amount of work done under this contract may differ from the quantities shown. The City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as directed by the Contract Manager.

C.24) PAVEMENT SURFACE PREPARATION
The Contractor shall be responsible for removing all vegetation from the edge of pavement, and cracks sweeping and washing the pavement in advance of slurry seal coat operations. Pressure washing shall be used for the complete removal of dust that may cause seal coat slippage. The Contractor shall remove and dispose of all pavement markers and traffic markings prior to the slurry seal coat as required by the Contract Manager.

All thermoplastic limit lines, crosswalks and legends applied to the road surface shall be scarified prior to placing the pavement repairs or slurry seal coats. Scarification shall be performed by grinding such that approximately 20% of the underlying pavement is exposed. All material resulting from the grinding operation shall be removed immediately from the right -of-way and shall be transported and properly disposed of off-site. Striping removal shall occur no sooner than one calendar day prior to slurry seal coat operations. If the striping removal is performed on a day other than the da y of pavement repair or seal coat operations, the Contractor shall supply and install temporary pavement markings at no additional cost as detailed in these Special Provisions. The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of the temporary pavement markings prior to placement of the slurry seal coat.

Pavement surface preparation shall include elastomeric applied sealing of pavement cracks. The Contract Manager shall direct the Contractor to seal asphalt surface cracks prior to the placement of the slurry seal.

Crack sealing material shall conform to the requirements for polymer- modified sealants as specified in ASTM D36, D5329, D3111, and D70 Specifications. Prior to the application of the crack sealant material the Contractor shall submit the manufacturer’s printed Product Data Sheets to the Contract Manager to verify conformance with these ASTM Specifications.

Asphalt sealants shall be applied to clean, dry, properly prepared pavement cracks. If crack width is less than ¼ inch, they must be routed before sealant is applied. When ambient temperatures are bel ow 40 degrees F. the Contractor shall use a hot compressed air lance to achieve clean, dry conditions for sealant installation.

Melt sealant in a kettle or melter constructed as an oil jacketed or “double” boiler. Sealant shall be applied at temperatures between 350 degrees and 400 degrees F. The kettle shall have temperature-monitoring capabilities to confirm conformance with this requirement.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

Prior
to sealant application remove vegetation and all incompressible materials from cracks by means of a hot compressed air lance. Cracks less than one quarter (1/4) inch in width must be routed to a minimum one half (1/2) inch by one half (1/2) inch in shape. Cracks shall be prepared using approved backing material after cleaning, if necessary, to maintain 1 to 1 depth to width profile as specified by the Contract Manager.

Install heated sealant directly into cracks not to exceed a one (1) inch wide band. Control thickness to one- eight (1/8) inch concave surface appearance.

All manholes, utility vaults, valve boxes and survey monument covers encountered in pavement areas to be repaired or sealed shall be carefully referenced out prior to pavement work by the Contractor. All exposed survey monuments shall be referenced out prior to the pave ment work, covered by an appropriate method approved by the Contract Man ager and uncovered after the slurry seal coat is completed without disturbing or damaging the survey monument.

The contract price paid for pavement surface preparation work is LANE MILE, along the edge of each paved lane parallel to the pavement ’s centerline and adjacent shoulder; and shal l include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, incidentals and for doing all work included in the preparation of pavement surface to receive slurry seal coat including the furnishing and placement of crack sealing material, the removal of thermoplastic limit lines, crosswalks and legends and the referencing out of all manhole, utility vaults, valve boxes and survey monuments, as specified in the Standard Construction Specifications, Special Provisions, and as directed by the Contract Manager and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore.

C.25) MOBILIZATION
Mobilization shall be in accordance with Section 8 -1.03, “Payment for Mobilization, ” of the Standard Construction Specifications.

C.26) DUST CONTROL
Attention is directed to Section 17, “Dust Control, ” of the Standard Construction Specifications. The Contractor shall be responsible for dust control. The Contractor shall diligently control dust resulting from operations and from public traffic passing through the work area by the application of water and/or dust palliative. Dust palliative shall conform to Section 17 -2, “Dust Palliative,” of the Standard Construction Specifications.

The Contrac tor shall provide dust control at all times, including Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays.

Whenever the Contractor shall appear negligent in controlling dust, the Contract Manager may direct attention to the existence of a dust hazard and instruct the Contractor to alleviate the dust hazard immediately.

Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work involved, and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.

C.27) SLURRY SEAL
This work includes placing of slurry seals. The estimated quantities involved in this section are for bidding purposes only. The quantity may be extended, reduced, or deleted at the discretion of the Contract Manager with no change in unit price.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

Slurry
seal shall conform to Section 14-3.04.A, “Slurry Seal (Type 2) ”, of the Standard Construction Specifications and these special provisions.

The aggregate for slurry seal shall be Type 2.

Polymer modified asphaltic emulsion shall be composed of a bituminous material uniformly emulsified with water and an emulsifying or stabilization agent and shall contain a polymer.

The polymer used in the manufacture of polymer modified asphaltic emulsions shall be at the option of the Contractor, either neoprene, or a copolymer of butadiene and styrene. Th e polymer used in the polymer modified asphaltic emulsion shall be homogenous and shall be milled into the product at the colloid mill.

C.28) BASE REPAIR
Base Repair provides for the full removal and replacement of minor areas of failed pavement. The estimated quantities involved in this section are for bidding purposes only. The quantity may be extended, reduced, or deleted at the discretion of the Contract Manager with no change in unit price.

Tack coat of asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, “Bituminous Seals,” 39, “Asphalt Concrete,” and 94 , “Asphaltic Emulsions ” of the Standard Specifications. Aggregate Base –Class II and Asphalt Concrete, ¾” Type A shall comply with these Special Provisions.

Base Repair shall consist of saw cutting, excavation , removal of existing failed roadway pavement and basement material, and proper disposal of all unsuitable materials. The structural section for Base Repair shall be the following unless directed otherwise by the Contract Manager.

• Arterial Base Repair shall be 5.5” AC over 20.5” AB
• Collector Base Repair shall be 4” AC over 14” AB

The areas of Base Repair shall have a minimum width of three (3) feet, a minimum length of five (5) feet, although most areas may be significantly larger in both dimensions. The area of removal of failed pavement and basement materials shall be as determined by the Contract Manager in the field. Any pavement removal required near the lip of gutter, the existing edge of pavement, or another area of pavement removal shall be extended such that no existing pavement shall remain with a width of less than twenty-four (24) inches.

A tack coat of asphalt emulsion shall be applied to all concrete and asphalt concrete edges in preparation for installing deep lift asphalt concrete. Each layer of asphalt concrete shall not exceed 0.40 foot in compacted thickness. No layer shall be placed over a layer which exceeds 0.25 foot in compacted thickness until the temperature at mid -depth, of the layer which exceeds 0.25 foot in compacted thickness, is no more than 160oF. The maximum thickness of the surface layer of deep lift asphalt concrete, that layer directly below leveling course or overlay, shall be 0.25 foot. Areas of Base Repair shall be brought up to the existing surface grade.

Payment for Base Repair shall be made per square foot of area repaired, as measured in the field. Payment shall be at the contract unit price bid per square foot and shall include all traffic control, saw cutting, excavation, removal and disposal of un-suitable material, furnishing and placement of Class II Aggregate Base, tack coat and ¾” Type A Aspha lt Concrete and labor and materials involved and no additional payment allowed, therefore.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

C.2
9) CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE (AB)
Aggregate base shall be Class 2 and shall conform to Section 22 -2, “Aggregate Base,” of the Standard Construction Specifications, Section 26, “Aggregate Bases,” of the Standard Specifications.

Aggregate base shall be produced from commercial quality aggregate consisting of broken stone, crushed gravel, clean, rough-surfaced gravel and sand, or a combination thereof. The grading of the material shall be three-fourth inch (3/4”) maximum. Spreading and compacting shall be performed by methods that will produce a uniform base when firmly and properly compacted free from pockets of coarse or fine material.

The Contractor shall insure the subbase is compacted to the requirements set forth in Section 25, “Aggregate Subbases,” of the Standard Specifications before placing aggregate base.

The aggregate base and aggregate subbase shall be placed in layers not to exceed 5” thick and shall have a relative compaction of 95% Class 2 aggregate. Aggregate base that is used to provide temporary access to work areas, driveways, and all other work that is necessary shall be paid for by the Contractor.

Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work involved and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.

C.30) ASPHALT CONCRETE (AC), TYPE A
The work in this Section shall include all labor, materials, and equipment required to complete all asphalt paving work, including, but not necessarily limited to, asphalt pavements and bases, asphalt overlays, and asphalt as specified herein or otherwise necessary so that other materials or work may be installed and/or performed and that the whole work is completed in accordance with the contract documents.

Tack coat of Type SS -1 asphaltic emulsion shall conform to Section 39 , “ Asphalt Concrete ”, and 94, “Asphaltic Emulsions”, of the Standard Specifications and shall be included in the unit bid price for asphalt concrete. All asphalt concrete on this project shall be as follows and as specified in Section 39 “Asphalt Concrete”, of the Standard Specifications and these Specifications.

All asphalt shall be viscosity grade AR-8000 and shall conform to the requirements of Section 92, “Asphalt Binders”, of the Standard Specifications. Supplying, mixing, proportioning and storing Asphalt Concrete, Type A shall conform to the requirements as specified in Section 39 , “Asphalt Concrete” of the Standard Specifications.

Hauling of asphalt concrete to the job site shall be in accordance with Section 23-5, “Hauling Equipment”, of the Standard Construction Specifications and these Specifications. Placement of asphalt concrete shall be in accordance with Section 23-8, “AC Placement Method”, of the Standard Construction Specifications and these Specifications. Should the methods and equipment furnished by the Contractor fail to produce a layer of asphalt concrete conforming to the requirements, including straightedge tolerance, of Section 39, “Asphalt Concrete”, of the Standard Specifications, the paving operations shall be discont inued and the Contractor shall modify his equipment or furnish substitute equipment. Placing of the asphaltic concrete adjacent to the lips of gutters shall be such that a rise above said lips of 1/4 inch shall remain after compaction.

Acceptance testing shall be in accordance with Section 23 -9, “AC Placement Acceptance Testing” of the Standard Construction Specification.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

The
completed surface shall be thoroughly compacted, smooth, and true to grade and cross section, free from ruts, humps, depressions or irregularities. When a straight edge 10 feet long is laid on the finished surface and parallel with the center line of t he highway, the surface shall not vary more than 0.01 feet from the lower edge of the straight edge. When tested transversely to traffic, the surface shall incline continuously in the direction of the drainage so that no depressions, which will not drain, remain in the surface after rolling. Any ridges, indentations or other objectionable marks left in the surface of the asphalt concrete by equipment shall be eliminated by rolling or other means. The use of any equipment that leaves ridges, indentations or other objectionable marks in the asphalt concrete shall be discontinued and other acceptable equipment shall be furnished by the contractor. A drop-off of more than 0.15-feet will not be allowed at any time between adjacent lanes open to public traffic. Kraft paper, or other approved bond breaker, may be placed under the conform tapers to facilitate the removal of the taper when paving operations resume. Half-width surfacing operations shall be conducted in such manner that, at the end of each day ’s work, t he distance between the ends of adjacent surfaced lanes shall not be greater than can be completed in the following day of normal surfacing operations. Shoulders adjacent to a lane being paved shall be surfaced prior to opening the lane to traffic. Finishing roadway shall conform to Section 22, “Finishing Roadway” of the Standard Specifications . The entire roadway and right -of-way shall be left in a neat and presentable condition to the satisfaction of the Contract Manager.

Quantities of material wasted or disposed of in a manner not called for under the contract, or rejected loads of material, including material rejected after it has been placed by reason of the failure of the Contractor to conform to the provisions of the contract, or materials placed outside the lines indicated from the transporting vehicle, or material remaining on hand after completion of the work, will not be paid for and such quantities will be deducted from the final total quantities. No compensation will be allowed for hauling rejected material. Asphalt Concrete, Type A is specified as included in other items of work listed in the RFB and no additional compensation shall be allowed, therefore.

C.31) TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
Restoration and/or removal and replacement of thermoplastic traffic stripes and pavement markings shall conform to Section 84, “Markings”, of the Standard Specifications and Section 48 -2, “Traffic Stripes and Pavement Markings”, of the Standard Construction Specifications.

The Contractor shall furnish all labor, equipment and materials required for restoration and/or removal and replacement of thermoplastic stripes and pavement markings. This work includes, but is not limited to, the following:

• Legends
• Arrows
• Limit Lines
• Barrier Lines
• Crosswalks

The Contractor shall furnish all labor, equipment, and materials required for removal and replacement of raised pavement markers.

Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work involved and no additional compensation will be allowed, therefore.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

C.3
2) LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
Attention is directed to Section 8 -1.10, “ Liquidated Damages ”, of the Standard Specifications , the liquidated damages for this contract shall be the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per working day.

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Contract No. 2022-281

SITE MAP

RANCHO CORDOVA SURFACE TREATMENT PROJECT
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 4

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 4

ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 4

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.3.

DATE: January 17, 2023

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Dalia Fadl, Principal Engineer

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENTION TO IMPOSE

AN ANNUAL STORMWATER UTILITY FEE FOR THE MAINTENANCE

OF STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION SYSTEMS FOR

THE RANCHO CORDOVA STORAGE PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution designating a time and place for hearing protests in connection with the annual Stormwater Utility Fee for the Rancho Cordova Storage project.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would declare the Council’s intention to impose an annual Stormwater Utility Fee for the maintenance of the storm drainage and flood protection system in the Rancho Cordova Storage project and set a public hearing for February 6, 2023 on the matter.

BACKGROUND

The Council previously approved the Rancho Cordova Storage project with a condition of approval which requires that the property owner fund operation and maintenance of the storm drainage system. This condition will be satisfied by participation in the City’s Stormwater Utility Fee for storm drainage and flood protection services, which is the subject of this action.

Previously, projects were required to annex to the County’s Stormwater Utility. Since the City has taken over drainage maintenance and operations services from the County, it was necessary to establish the Stormwater Utility District to fund drainage services to ensure compliance with new state and federal laws and regulations. The Stormwater Utility Fee was established on September 2, 2014, by Ordinance No. 7-2014.

DISCUSSION

The property owners have submitted a petition and waiver for the City to institute the proceedings to impose the Stormwater Utility Fee (Attachment 5). The project is being annexed into the Stormwater Utility Fee (Attachment 3). The maintenance services to be funded include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation, maintenance, and servicing of the storm drain and flood protection improvements.

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

A “Rate Analysis Report” was adopted on August 7, 2014, by Resolution No. 103-2014. The report calculated the Fiscal Year 2014/2015 maximum annual Stormwater Utility Fee amount for each parcel proportionate to the estimated stormwater runoff for each parcel. The maximum annual fee increases each subsequent Fiscal Year by the annual change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), during the preceding year, for All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco- Oakland-San Jose areas, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. A sample of the Stormwater Utility Fees for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 is provided in Attachment 4.

In accordance with Article XIII D, the “Procedures for the Conduct of a Protest Hearing and Balloting Relating to a Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee” as set forth in Attachment 2 and incorporated herein by reference (the “Procedures”).

The Resolution (Attachment 1) sets the public hearing at 5:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, on February 6, 2023, as the time and date for a hearing on the matters set forth therein and directs the City Clerk to give notice of the public hearing. Notice of the Public Hearing will be published in the Grapevine Independent as required by law.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no fiscal impact to the general fund. The annual stormwater utility fees collected are deposited into an enterprise fund specifically for the maintenance of the storm drainage and flood protection system.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution

3. Annexation Boundary Map

4. Stormwater Utility Fee- Rate Sheet FY22-23

5. Petition with Waivers

ITEM 16.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS IN

CONNECTION WITH THE ANNUAL STORMWATER UTILITY FEE FOR THE RANCHO

CORDOVA STORAGE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Stormwater Utility Fee was established on September 2, 2014 by Ordinance No. 7-2014 to fund services and facilities furnished by the City in connection with its storm drain system. The Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee may be billed through the County Utility Billing Service (CUBS) as part of the consolidated utility bill or may be collected on the County of Sacramento tax roll, commencing in Fiscal Year 2022-2023, in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, the general taxes of the City in the manner prescribed by Sections 5471 et seq. of the California Health and Safety Code; and
WHEREAS, this Council has caused a written report entitled, "Rate Analysis Report", dated August 7, 2014, (the "Written Report") prepared by Harris & Associates and filed with the City Clerk containing a description of each parcel of real property within the City to which the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee is applicable (collectively, the "Identified Parcels") and the amount of the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee for each such Identified Parcel for Fiscal Year 2014-15. The Written Report is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is available for public inspection; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII D of the California Constitution and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750, et seq.) (the "Implementation Act") imposes certain procedural and substantive requirements relating to the imposition of property- related fees and charges (as defined in Article XIII D), such as the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee, including the requirement to conduct a protest hearing and balloting for consideration of the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee. In accordance with Article XIII D and the Implementation Act, the City Council hereby approves the "Procedures for the Conduct of a Protest Hearing and Balloting Relating to a Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee" as set forth in Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference (the "Procedures"); and WHEREAS this Council has received petitions and waivers from the owners of 100% of the area of land proposed to be included in the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee in which the Petitioner has waived all notices of hearings and all published notices regarding the establishment of the stormwater utility fee, notices of election, and applicable waiting periods.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein.

2. Notice is hereby given that the City Council designates Monday, February 6, 2023, at the hour of 5:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, California, as the time and place for a public hearing on the above- described written report and protests or objections to the imposition of the proposed Stormwater Utility Fee. At the above-described public hearing, all interested persons

ITEM 16.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 2 shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard, and the City Council shall consider all protests against the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee. If written protests against the Stormwater Utility Fee are presented by a majority of owners of the Identified Parcels, the City shall not impose the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee. In the absence of a majority protest, the City Council may submit the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee to a vote of the property owners in accordance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of the above-described public hearing in accordance with law and the Procedures.

4. Reference is hereby made to the Written Report described in Section 2 hereof, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee upon parcels of land within the City.

5. The City Council hereby designates Dalia Fadl, Principal Engineer, telephone number, (916) 851-8718 to answer inquiries regarding the public hearing, protest proceedings and procedural or technical matters.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 17th day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Linda Budge, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

ITEM 16.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

EXHIBIT "A"

PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF A

PROTEST HEARING AND VOTE RELATING TO A PROPOSED

STORMWATER UTILITY FEE
The following Procedures have been adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova for the purpose of conducting a protest hearing required by Article XIII D of the California Constitution for consideration of the imposition of a proposed Stormwater Utility Fee (the "Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee”).

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Written Report
B. Notice of the Public Hearing on the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee C. Eligibility to File a Protest
D. Submission of Written Protests
E. Conduct of the Public Hearing; Determination of A Majority Protest F. Conduct Property Owner Vote; Determination of a Majority Protest

A. Written Report
The City shall cause to be prepared a written report ("Written Report"), which shall contain a list of all parcels to which the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee will apply (the "Identified Parcels") and the amount of the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee for each Identified Parcel for Fiscal Year 2020- 2021.

The Written Report shall be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk prior to the mailing of the Notice of Public Hearing on the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee and shall remain available for public inspection.

B. Notice of the Public Hearing on the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee Notice of the public hearing on the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee shall be sent, postage prepaid, by first class mail at least forty-five (45) days prior to the date set for the public hearing to the Record Owner of each Identified Parcel. The forty-five (45) day requirement may be waived with the unanimous consent of the property owners.

ITEM 16.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

"Record Owner" means the owner of an Identified Parcel whose name and address appears on the last Sacramento County equalized secured property tax assessment roll (the "Assessment Roll"), or in the case of any public entity, the State of California, or the United States, means the representative of that public entity at the address of that entity known to the City.

Notices shall be mailed to the Record Owners of the Identified Parcels, addressed to the names and addresses as they appear on the Assessment Roll, and, in the case of any public entity, the State of California, or the United States, addressed to the public entity at the address of that entity known to the City. In addition, notices shall be mailed to owners of the Identified Parcels, addressed to the names and addresses known to the City Clerk, if different than shown on the Assessment Roll.

Each mailed notice shall contain all of the following:
· A reference to filing of the Written Report;
· A reference to the proposed ordinance imposing the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee and providing for the collection of the Fee on the County tax roll; · The amount of the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee to be imposed upon the Identified Parcel covered by the notice;
· The basis upon which the amount of the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee was calculated; · The reason for the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee;
· A statement that the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee may be collected as part of a consolidated utility bill via CUBS or on the County of Sacramento tax roll each year, commencing with Fiscal Year 2021-2022.
· The effect of a majority protest; and
· The date, time and location of a public hearing on the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee.

The City Clerk, or the designee of the City Clerk, may certify the proper mailing of notices by an affidavit, which shall constitute conclusive proof of mailing in the absence of fraud.

Failure of any person to receive notice shall not invalidate the proceedings.

Notice of the filing of the Written Report and the public hearing shall be published once a week for two successive weeks in the Grapevine Independent, with the first publication at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date of the public hearing, and with at least five (5) days intervening between the first and second publications. The published notice may be waived by unanimous consent of the property owners.

C. Eligibility to File a Protest
The Assessment Roll shall be presumptive evidence of ownership of an Identified Parcel for protest purposes.

ITEM 16.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

If the owner of any Identified Parcel is not shown on the Assessment Roll, such owner may file a protest for such parcel by filing with the City Clerk a proxy from the Record Owner in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney or evidence of ownership satisfactory to the City Attorney. Any such proxy or evidence must be received by the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

When an Identified Parcel is held by a partnership, as community property, in joint tenancy, or as a tenancy in common, any partner, spouse, joint tenant, or tenant in common, as the case may be, may file a protest for such parcel.

An executor, administrator, or guardian may file a protest for an Identified Parcel on behalf of the estate it represents. If such representative is shown on the Assessment Roll as paying taxes and assessments levied against the parcel, that fact shall establish the right of such representative to file the protest. If such representative is not shown on the Assessment Roll, the representative must file with the City Clerk written documentation satisfactory to the City Attorney establishing the legal representation. Any such documentation must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

When an Identified Parcel is held by a corporation or unincorporated association, a protest may be filed by any person authorized in writing by the board of directors or trustees or other managing body thereof to take such actions. The corporation or unincorporated association must file with the City Clerk written authorization satisfactory to the City Attorney. Any such written authorization must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.

D. Submission of Written Protests
Written protests may be mailed (via U.S. mail) to the City Clerk at City Hall or delivered in person to the City Clerk at City Hall or at the public hearing.

No protests delivered via e-mail will be counted for purposes of determining whether a majority protest exists, but the City Council may, in its discretion, consider such protests in making determinations regarding the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee Each written protest must identify the property covered by the protest and be signed.

No protest received after the close of the public hearing shall be counted in determining the existence of a majority protest. The last pick up by the City Clerk of protests mailed or delivered to City Hall will occur at 5:30 p.m. on the date scheduled for the public hearing. To ensure that protests which are mailed or delivered to City Hall are received by the City Clerk prior to the close of the public hearing, such protests must be received by the City Clerk at City Hall prior to 5:30 p.m. on the date scheduled for the public hearing. The City Clerk shall endorse on each written protest the date it is filed with the City. The City Clerk shall identify any protests which are received after the close of the public hearing.

Written protests may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing by the person who submitted the written protest.

For purposes of determining whether a majority protest exists, only one protest for each Identified Parcel will be counted.

ITEM 16.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

All written protests shall be considered public records.

E. Conduct of the Public Hearing; Determinationof a Majority Protest

1. At the time, date and place fixed for the public hearing, the City Council shall:
(i) Conduct a public hearing pertaining to the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee; (ii) Hear all persons interested in the matter of the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee; and (iii) Receive all written communications regarding the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee.

2. The public hearing may be continued from time to time, as the City Council determines is necessary to complete its consideration of the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee.

3. If the City Council determines at the close of the public hearing that written protests have been presented, and not withdrawn, by a majority of owners of the Identified Parcels (i.e., there is a majority protest), the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee shall not be approved.

4. If the City Council determines at the close of the public hearing that there is not a majority protest, the City Council may:
(i) Remedy and correct any clerical error in the Written Report or otherwise modify the Written Report; provided that any such modification or correction shall not result in a Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee for any Identified Parcel which is greater than the amount shown in the notice of the public hearing that was mailed to the Record Owner of the Identified Parcel;
(ii) Confirm the Written Report, as originally filed or as amended in accordance with subparagraph (i), above;
(iii) Adopt a resolution calling for a property owner vote regarding the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee.

F. Conduct Property Owner Vote: Determination of a Majority Consent Pursuant to Government Code Section 53755.S(c), the proceedings described in this section shall not constitute an election or voting for purposes of Article II of the California Constitution or of the Elections Code.

An election on the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee shall be sent, postage prepaid, by first class mail at least forty-five (45) days prior to the date set for the election to the Record Owner of each Identified Parcel. The forty-five (45) day requirement may be waived with the unanimous consent of the property owners.

Each mailed ballot shall contain all of the following:
•On the face of the envelope in which the notice of election and ballot are mailed, there shall appear in substantially the following form in no smaller than 16-point bold type:
"OFFICIALBALLOT ENCLOSED."

ITEM 16.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

• The ballot shall include the agency's address for return of the ballot, the date and location where the ballots will be tabulated, and a place where the person returning it may indicate his or her name, a reasonable identification of the parcel, and his or her support or opposition to the proposed fee. The ballots shall be tabulated in a location accessible to the public. The ballot shall be in a form that conceals its content once it is sealed by the person submitting it. The ballot shall remain sealed until the ballot tabulation commences.

No ballot received after the time of the ballot tabulation shall be counted in determining the existence of majority consent. The last pick up by the City Clerk of ballots mailed or delivered to City Hall will occur at 1:30 p.m. on the date scheduled for the election. To ensure that ballots which are mailed or delivered to City Hall are received by the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the ballot tabulation , such ballots must be received by the City Clerk at City Hall prior to 5:30 p.m. on the date scheduled for the ballot tabulation. The City Clerk shall endorse on each ballot the date it is filed with the City. The City Clerk shall identify any ballots which are received after the commencement of the ballot tabulation.

An impartial person designated by the City who does not have a vested interest in the outcome of the proposed fee shall tabulate the ballots submitted in support of or opposition to the proposed fee. An impartial person includes, but is not limited to, the City Clerk. If the City uses City personnel for the ballot tabulation , or if the City contracts with a vendor for the ballot tabulation and the vendor or its affiliates participated in the research, design, engineering, public education, or promotion of the fee, the ballots shall be unsealed and tabulated in public view to permit all interested persons to meaningfully monitor the accuracy of the tabulation process .

The ballot tabulation may be continued to a different time or different location accessible to the public, provided that the time and location are announced at the location at which the tabulation commenced and posted by the City in a location accessible to the public. The impartial person may use technological methods to tabulate the ballots, including, but not limited to, punchcard or optically readable (bar-coded) ballots. During and after the tabulation , the ballots and, if applicable, the information used to determine the weight of each ballot, shall be treated as public records, subject to public disclosure and made available for inspection by any interested person.

The ballots shall be preserved for a minimum of two years, after which they may be destroyed.

Majority approval of the Record Owners shall exist if the number of valid ballots in favor of the fee exceeds the number of valid ballots in opposition to the fee.

At the time, date and place fixed for the ballot tabulation, the City Council shall direct the City Clerk to commence the ballot tabulation.

If there is no majority approval, the Stormwater Utility Fee shall not be imposed .

If majority approval exists, the City Council may impose the Stormwater Utility Fee pursuant to the Ordinance .

Legend
Annexation Boundary
Parcel Boundary

QUICKSILVER DR

SECURITY PARK DR

AMERICANOS BLVD

DOUGLAS RD
!

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

STORMWATER UTILITY FEE AREA
ANNEXATION 30

RANCHO CORDOVA STORAGE PROJECT
APN
072-
0540-002
APN
072-
0540-003
ITEM 16.3.

ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 16.3. ATTACHMENT 4 Stormwater Utility Fee
Sample of the Stormwater Utility Fees for Fiscal Year 2022-2023:

Table 1
Land Use Description
Total Area
(acres) Sample Fee
Single Family Residential (SFR1) 0.16 $143.40
Single Family Residential (SFR2) 0.22 $157.73
Single Family Residential (SFR3) 0.30 $168.51
Single Family Residential (SFR4) 0.40 $179.24
Single Family Residential (SFR5) 1.00 $179.24
Multi-Family Residential (MFR1) 5.00 $1,254.93
Commercial 1.00 $1,344.58
Industrial 1.00 $1,434.24
Schools 5.00 $896.39
Private Recreation 1.00 $448.17
Parks/Greenbelts 2.00 $179.24
Public Property (with structures) 2.00 $537.81

ITEM 16.3.

ATTACHMENT 5

ITEM 16.3.

ATTACHMENT 5

ITEM 16.3.

ATTACHMENT 5

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.4.

DATE: January 17, 2023

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Edgar Medina, Principal Engineer

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AMENDMENT 2021-75-11 WITH

TEICHERT CONSTRUCTION TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT
AMOUNT FROM $11,949,145.95 TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$12,440,317.95 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WHITE ROCK ROAD - FITZGERALD ROAD TO 0.5 MILE EAST OF RANCHO CORDOVA

PARKWAY PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the City Manager to execute Construction Contract Amendment No. 2021-75-11 with Teichert Construction increasing the contract amount from $11,949,145.95 to an amount not to exceed $12,440,317.95 for the construction of White Rock Road - Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway Project. The City will be reimbursed for this contract increase by a separate agreement with the Sacramento County Water Agency.

BACKGROUND

The White Rock Road - Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway Project is part of an innovative planning effort to alleviate regional congestion, improve roadway safety, nurture economic development, and promote the livability and quality of life in Rancho Cordova and the greater Sacramento region.

Prior to the project, White Rock Road was in very poor condition, which impeded safe and efficient transportation, freight movement, and economic growth. This project improved approximately 1.3 mile of undivided 2-lane rural road by replacing a deteriorating segment of roadway, realigning and widening the road from two to four travel lanes to add capacity, add bike lanes, median landscaping, drainage facilities, traffic signals and new water system improvements that were coordinated with the Sacramento County Water Agency. The project is nearly complete, with the energization of the Macal Drive signal being the remaining activity for the project.

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

The City Council awarded the construction contract on May 17, 2021 to Teichert Construction in the amount of $11,067,288.00 with construction beginning in July 2021. Per Rancho Cordova Municipal Code, Section 3.60.110 C, the City Manager is given the authority to approve change orders up to 10% of the contract value. Since approval of the contract in May 2021, there have been 10 administrative change orders having a value of $881,857,95, increasing the total contract amount to $11,949,145.95.

Change Order No 11 is valued at an amount of $491,172.00, which exceeds the City Manager's signing authority, thus requiring Council Approval. This change order represents reimbursable construction items related to the Sacramento County Water Agency's scope of work which include but not limited to: 1) adjustments resulting from conflicts between the waterline and asbestos cement pipe, fiber optic lines, gas lines & storm drain lines, 2) over excavation due to unsuitable native material 3) modifications to waterline tie in connection points and 4) final waterline material quantities.

These items have been coordinated with the water agency and are addressed in the executed contract (No. 2021-86), entitled "Reimbursement Agreement between the Sacramento County Water Agreement and the City of Rancho Cordova regarding the White Rock Road Widening:

Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 mile east of Rancho Cordova Parkway Project".

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

Change Order No. 11 is a reimbursable amount to the City under the executed reimbursement agreement between the City and the Sacramento County Water Agency.

Funding for this project consists of $8,500,000 Federal Grants, Sacramento County Water Agency Reimbursement, Developer Contribution and Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees. There is no impact to the City’s General Fund.

This project is included in the City’s current approved Capital Improvement Plan and in the 2021/22 - 2022/2023 budget.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Contract No. 2021-75-11

ITEM 16.4. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2021-75-11 INCREASING THE CONTRACT AMOUNT FROM $11,949,145.95 TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $12,440,317.95 WITH TEICHERT CONSTRUCTION FOR THE WHITE ROCK ROAD - FITZGERALD ROAD TO 0.5 MILE EAST

OF RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City solicited bids for the White Rock Road - Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway Project under the requirements of state law and publicly opened bids on April 29, 2021; and

WHEREAS, on May 17, 2021 the City Council awarded construction contract no. 2021-75 to Teichert Construction in the amount of $11,067,288.00; and

WHEREAS, this Project replaces a deteriorating segment of roadway, realigns and widens the roadway from two to four lanes, adds bike lanes, median landscaping, drainage facilities, traffic signals and waterline facilities; and

WHEREAS, under Rancho Cordova Municipal Code, Section 3.60.110 C, the City has processed change orders 1 through 10, increasing the contract by $881,857,95; and WHEREAS, Change Order No 11 in the amount of $491,172.00 exceeds the City Manager's signing authority to approve; and
WHEREAS, This change order represents reimbursable construction items related to the Sacramento County Water Agency's scope of work which include but not limited to: 1) adjustments resulting from conflicts between the waterline and asbestos cement pipe, fiber optic lines, gas lines & storm drain lines, 2) over excavation due to unsuitable native material 3) modifications to waterline tie in connection points and 4) final waterline material quantities; and WHEREAS, the City and the Sacramento County Water Agency executed a reimbursement agreement, Contract No. 2021-86, addressing the waterline scope of work and associated reimbursement costs; and
WHEREAS, this Project was reviewed under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and National Environmental Policy Act and an Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Assessment with Finding of No Significant Impact and Section 4(f) Evaluation was approved in January 2016 and re-validated in September 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute contract amendment no 2021-75-11 in an amount of $491,172.00 with Teichert Construction, increasing the contract amount from $11,949,145.95 to an amount not to exceed $12,440,317.95 for the construction of the White Rock Road - Fitzgerald Road to 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 17th

ITEM 16.4. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 2 day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Linda Budge, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Project Name:

WHITE ROCK ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1
Sheet 1 of 18
City Contract No. 2021-75

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Contract Change Order No. 11
To: Teichert Construction. You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications on this contract.

Description of work to be done, quantities and prices to be paid. Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental of equipment cover only such time as equipment is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle time.

Change requested by: Engineer
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670  (916) 851-8700  Fax (916) 851-8787  www.cityofranchocordova.org Form 3.14A Contract Change Order (rev. 02-14-2011)

1. PCO#25 – Waterline conflicts with proposed storm drain – Contractor incurred additional costs associated with existing water line and new storm drain construction. Costs included additional shoring and loss of production. Payment for this work is at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $14,000.00

2. PCO#25 – Waterline conflicts with existing ACP - Station 153+28. In accordance with RFI #40 response, Contractor directed to place slurry backfill. See Attachment #1 for revised plan sheets. Payment for this work shall be at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $5,225.00

3. PCO #25 – Waterline conflicts with existing ACP and Fiber Optic utility – In accordance with RFI#45 response, Contractor directed to realign waterline to avoid conflicts with existing ACP and fiber optic utility.

Contractor incurred costs for loss of production, additional materials, shoring, re-staking. See Attachment No. 1 for revised plan sheets. Payment for this work shall be at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $89,232.00

4. PCO#25 – Waterline conflicts – Station 177+84. In accordance with RFI#49 response, Contractor directed to realign waterline to avoid conflict with new gas line. Contractor incurred additional costs for loss of production, materials, re-staking. See Attachment No. 1 for revised plan sheets. Payment for this work shall be at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $18,337.00

5. PCO#25 – Waterline conflicts Station 122+18. In accordance with RFI#52 response, Contractor directed to realign waterline to avoid conflict with existing 16” ACP. Contractor incurred additional costs for loss of production, shoring, re-staking. See Attachment No. 1 for revised plan sheets. Payment for this work shall be at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $5,366.00

6. PCO#25 – State Waiver Re-Verifications. Contractor directed by CMID inspector to re- expose and backfill numerous storm drain and watermain crossing locations in order for CMID inspector to obtain photographic and document that the waterline and storm drain have been installed per plan and in accordance with the State Waiver requirements. Payment for work at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $18,000.00

7. PCO#28 – Unsuitable Waterline Trench and Differing Site Conditions Station 175+00 – Contractor encountered excessive surface water and unsuitable trench bottom and was directed to over-excavate and place crushed rock and filter fabric in accordance with County Specifications. Contractor incurred costs including loss of production, equipment rental Payment for this work shall be at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $34,000.00

8. PCO#29 – Waterline installation acceleration – City directed contractor to accelerate and work overtime due to the many waterline revisions in order to maintain schedule to open White Rock Road. Payment for this work shall be at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $56,400.00

9. PCO#34 – Fire Hydrant Relocate – Station 137+00 – Contractor directed to relocate fire hydrant to behind sidewalk instead of in the middle of the recently constructed sidewalk from RDO project. Payment for this work shall be at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $13,660.00

10. PCO#47 – Water conflict – Collector A – Contractor encountered conflict with existing 16” water main and fiber optic utility at Collector A. Contractor incurred additional costs to realign new water main. Payment for this work shall be at Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $18,180.00

11. PCO#40 – Luyung Water Tie-in – Contractor directed by CMID to re-do the 12” water tie-in at Luyung to remove the vertical 90deg. fittings and install 22.5 deg fittings to increase the restrained length. Payment for this work shall be at the Agreed Lump Sum.

Increase $23,037.00

12. Non-compensable time extension – City agrees to grant time extension of 35 working days for all waterline revisions and extra work.

SUBTOTAL $295,437.00
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

Project Name:

WHITE ROCK ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1
Sheet 2 of 18
City Contract No. 2021-75

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Contract Change Order No. 11
To: Teichert Construction. You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications on this contract.

Description of work to be done, quantities and prices to be paid. Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental of equipment cover only such time as equipment is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle time.

Change requested by: Engineer
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670  (916) 851-8700  Fax (916) 851-8787  www.cityofranchocordova.org Form 3.14A Contract Change Order (rev. 02-14-2011)
Adjustment of Bid Item Quantities at Contract Unit Price

11. PCO#15 - The contract quantities shall be adjusted as detailed in the table below due to plan revisions and actual field measurements. See Attachment No. 1 for revised plan sheets.

INCREASE: $195,735 .00
Bid Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount
66 Install 8” DIP (Restrained) -2 LF $120.00 -$240.00
67 Install 10” DIP (Restrained) -8 LF $110.00 -$880.00
68 Install 12” DIP -178 LF $80.00 -$14,240.00
69 Install 12” DIP (Restrained) 52 LF $200.00 $10,400.00 70 Install 16” DIP 90 LF $115.00 $10,350.00
71 Install 16” DIP (Restrained) 44 LF $250.00 $22,500.00 72 Install 24” DIP -429 LF $145.00 -$62,205.00
73 Install 24” DIP (Restrained) 524 LF $425.00 $222,700.00 74 Install 30” DIP -48 LF $675.00 -$32,400.00
76 Install 12” Butterfly Valve -1 EA $5,500.00 $5,500.00 77 Install 16” Butterfly Valve -1 EA $8,900.00 -$8,900.00 78 Install 24” Butterfly Valve 1 EA $20,000.00 $20,000.00 80 Install 4” In-Line Blow Off Assembly 1 EA $7,300.00 $7,300.00 89 Tie-in to Existing Pipelines 1 EA $8,000.00 $8,000.00 117 (new) Material increase due to revisions 1 LS $7,850.00 $7,850.00 $195,735.00
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

Project Name:

WHITE ROCK ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1
Sheet 3 of 18
City Contract No. 2021-75

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Contract Change Order No. 11
To: Teichert Construction. You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications on this contract.

Description of work to be done, quantities and prices to be paid. Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental of equipment cover only such time as equipment is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle time.

Change requested by: Engineer
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670  (916) 851-8700  Fax (916) 851-8787  www.cityofranchocordova.org Form 3.14A Contract Change Order (rev. 02-14-2011)
Submitted by:

Const ruction Manager/
Resident Engineer
City of Rancho Cordova Date:

Recommend
Approval by:

Project Manager
City of Rancho Cordova Date:

Approved by:

Public Works Director
City of Rancho Cordova Date:

We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and all of its impacts, both direct and indirect, and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices and time extensions shown above.

Acceptance
Date: Contractor:

By: Title:

If the Contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.

Original to: Contractor City Clerk
Copies t
o: Resident Engineer City Project
Manager
City Manager or Designee
City of Rancho Cordova
Date
Authority: 65-2021
Contract Summation:

Total Cost of
Change:
$491,172.00
Original
Contract:
$11,067,288.00 Total Change
Orders:
$1,373,029.95 New Contract Cost
Total:
$12,440,317.95
By reason of this order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: 35 working days ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
Sheet 4 of 18
CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 - ATTACHMENT NO.1

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 5 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
Sheet 6 of 18
CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 - ATTACHMENT NO.1

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
Sheet 7 of 18
CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 - ATTACHMENT NO.1

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 8 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 9 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12- ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 10 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 11 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 12 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 13 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 14 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 15 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 16 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 17 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-B Tel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767Sacramento, CA 95816
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Sheet 18 of 18
ITEM 16.4.

ATTACHMENT 2

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 1

ITEM 16.5.

DATE: January 17, 2023

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Elizabeth Sparkman, Community Development Director

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE

A FIRST AMENDMENT TO ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH UPAVANTI INC. INCREASING THE ON-CALL
CONTRACT AMOUNT FROM $100,000 TO $1,500,000 TO PROVIDE

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to increase the level of services to an amount not to exceed $1,500,000.

BACKGROUND

On November 28, 2022, the City executed Contract No. 2022-256, an on-call professional services agreement in the amount of $100,000 with UpAvanti Inc.to provide on-call professional services including building plan review and inspection services. Due to the increase and magnitude of building development projects, there is a need to increase the on-call services for UpAvanti Inc. from $100,000 to an amount not to exceed $1,500,000. The attached Resolution (Attachment 1) authorizes the City Manager to execute the First Amendment in the form of Contract No. 2022-256-1 (Attachment 2) to increase the on-call services to an amount not to exceed $1,500,000. The expiration date remains the same at December 31, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no Fiscal Impact. The contract will be funded by building permit revenues received which provide an allocation for plan review and inspection services.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. First Amendment

ITEM 16.5. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 1

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FIRST

AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT INCREASING THE ON- CALL AMOUNT FROM $100,000 TO $1,500,000 TO PROVIDE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW

AND INSPECTION SERVICES

WHEREAS, on November 28, 2022 the City executed Contract No. 2022-256, an on-call professional services agreement with UpAvanti Inc, an S Corporation, in the form of Contract No. 2022-256 with an expiration date of December 31, 2025; and

WHEREAS, due to the increase in building development projects and the amount of work required to be provided for qualified building plan review services, there is a need to increase the on-call not to exceed amount for UpAvanti Inc. from $100,000 to $1,500,000; and

WHEREAS, the on-call amount exceeds the City Manager's signing authority to approve.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment in the form of Contract No. 2022-256-1 with UpAvanti Inc. increasing the on-call professional services to an amount not to exceed $1,500,000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 17th day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Linda Budge, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

ITEM 16.5. ATTACHMENT 2 CONTRACT NO. 2022-256-1
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between Page 1 of 2 City of Rancho Cordova and UpAvanti Inc.

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND UPAVANTI INC.

This First Amendment to the On-Call Agreement for Professional Services (“Amendment”) is made by and between the City of Rancho Cordova (“City”) and UpAvanti Inc. (“Professional”) as of December 20, 2022. City and Professional are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) dated November 28, 2022 for the purpose of providing on-call professional plan review, permitting, and field inspections; and
WHEREAS, this Amendment will increase the on-call contract amount from $100,000 to $1,500.000; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that changes to the term and services provided for in the PSA are necessary in order for the City to continue receiving services by Professional.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Section 2 of the PSA, “Compensation,” provides for the City to pay Professional a sum not to exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000). The Parties agree to amend Section 2 of the PSA in order to increase the compensation amount to pay Professional for additional services.

The first sentence of Section 2 of the PSA is amended to read as follows:
"City hereby agrees to pay Professional a sum not to exceed One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (1,500,000), notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be contained in Professional’s proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement.”

2. All other terms and conditions in the PSA shall remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this Amendment.

3. The signatures of the Parties to this Amendment may be executed and acknowledged on separate pages or in counterparts which, when attached to this Amendment, shall constitute one complete Amendment.

ITEM 16.5. ATTACHMENT 2 CONTRACT NO. 2022-256-1
First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement between Page 2 of 2 City of Rancho Cordova and UpAvanti Inc.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA PROFESSIONAL
____________________________ ______________________________ Micah Runner, City ManagerSareh Deyhimi, P.E., CASp, CBO Date: _______________________ Date: _________________________ Attest:
____________________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk
Date: _______________________
Approved as to Form:
____________________________
Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Date: _______________________

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 3

ITEM 16.6.

DATE: January 17, 2023

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Adam Lindgren, City Attorney

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CORDOVA AND ON BEHALF OF COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

CREATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54952(B) CONFIRMING THE STATE OF
EMERGENCY UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 8625,

RECOGNIZING CONTINUED MEASURES TO PROMOTE SOCIAL

DISTANCING, AND RE-AUTHORIZING REMOTE TELECONFERENCE
MEETINGS OF THE CITY FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 17,
2023 THROUGH FEBRUARY 16, 2023

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would allow the City Council and the City’s other legislative bodies to continue to meet via teleconference (“virtually”) in a manner substantially similar to the manner in which they have met during the COVID-19 pandemic, if a proclaimed State of Emergency remains in effect and other requirements are satisfied.

BACKGROUND

All meetings of the City Council and the City’s other legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code section 54950 et seq., so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business. On March 17, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act in order to allow local legislative bodies to conduct virtual meetings to slow the spread of COVID-

19. As a result of Executive Order N-29-20, City Staff set up virtual meetings for the City Council and other City legislative bodies. On June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which, effective September 30, 2021, ended the provisions of Executive Order N-29-20 that allowed local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means.

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 361 (“AB 361”), which allows local legislative bodies to continue to conduct meetings via teleconferencing under specified conditions. AB 361 took effect upon the expiration of Executive Order N-29-20 on October 1,

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 3

2021. On September 20, 2021, the City Council held a meeting in compliance with AB 361’s requirements for remote meetings.

In order for AB 361 to remain effective for meetings of the City’s legislative bodies, the City Council is required to make specified findings every 30 days. AB 361 allows a legislative body to continue holding meetings utilizing teleconferencing without complying with the standard teleconferencing requirements if a State of Emergency is proclaimed under Government Code section 8625, the City has reconsidered the emergency conditions, and if the local Public Health Officer continues to recommend social distancing measures to protect the public’s health and safety during local government meetings. These conditions are present.

Governor Newsom’s March 4, 2020 Proclamation of Emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic is still in effect. The potential spread of COVID-19 continues to threaten public health and safety during indoor public gatherings, including indoor gatherings of the Rancho Cordova City Council and other Rancho Cordova legislative bodies. In addition, the Sacramento County Public Health Officer continues to recommend teleconferencing or social distancing to protect the public’s health and safety during local government meetings.

SUMMARY

The attached Resolution makes the required findings that the current conditions exist to allow teleconference meetings pursuant to AB 361 for the City Council and on behalf of all of the legislative bodies commissions and committees created by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 54952(b). This will allow members of the public to safely observe and participate in local government meetings during the pandemic.

If a meeting is held via teleconference under AB 361, the following requirements apply:

1.Notices and agenda requirements remain the same under the Brown Act;

2.No physical location is required for public attendance or public comment.However, the public must be able to access and participate in the meeting through a call-in or an internet-based service, and instructions for how to participate must appear in the posted notices or agenda;

3.Teleconference meetings must protect the statutory and constitutional rights of the parties and the public;

4.If there is any disruption of the call-in or internet-based service, the agency must suspend the meeting until the problem is fixed;

5.Legislative bodies may allow public comments to be submitted prior to a meeting but must also allow the public to participate in real time through call-in or internet-based service;

6.If an internet-based service requires registration through a third-party, individuals can be required to register with the third-party to participate in the meeting; and

7.When providing a public comment period, whether after each item or during a general comment period, a legislative body must allow reasonable time for members of the public to comment and must also include reasonable time for members to register with a third-party host if applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 3

The cost of continued remote access to Council meetings and the meetings of other City committees.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

ITEM 16.6. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 3

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND ON

BEHALF OF COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES CREATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54952(b) CONFIRMING THE STATE OF EMERGENCY UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 8625, RECOGNIZING CONTINUED

MEASURES TO PROMOTE SOCIAL DISTANCING, AND RE-AUTHORIZING REMOTE

TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE CITY FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 17, 2023 TO FEBRUAY 16, 2023
WHEREAS, the City is committed to preserving and promoting public access and participation in meetings of the legislative bodies; and WHEREAS, all meetings of the City are open and public, as required by the Ralph M.

Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City conduct their business; and WHEREAS, the Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e), makes provisions for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, a required condition is that a state of emergency is declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 8558; and
WHEREAS, it is further required that state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or, the legislative body meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 2021 the City held a meeting during a state of emergency under Government Code section 8625 and during a period of recommended social distancing by state and local officials while complying with Government Code section 54953(e)(2); and WHEREAS, the City is required to make certain findings every thirty (30) days to continue teleconferencing under Government Code section 54953(e)(3), including reconsideration of the state of emergency declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, and State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; and
WHEREAS, the City continues to experience emergency conditions due to COVID-19, specifically, the highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (“Delta”) continues to threaten public health and safety during indoor public gatherings; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the circumstances of the Governor’s state of emergency proclamation pursuant to Government Code section 8625, which remains active; and

ITEM 16.6. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, on July 30, 2021, the Sacramento County Health Officer issued an order requiring all individuals, regardless of vaccination status, to wear a mask while indoors in public spaces; and
WHEREAS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) continues to recommend physical distancing of at least six feet (6’) from others outside of the household; and WHEREAS, the Sacramento County Health Officer’s order incorporates the CDC’s guidance for vaccinated and unvaccinated people; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, acting as a legislative body pursuant to Government Code section 54952(a) and for the benefit of the commissions, committees, and other bodies that were created by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 54952(b) (collectively referred to as the “Legislative Bodies”), does hereby find that the Legislative Bodies shall continue to conduct their meetings without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54953, as authorized by subdivision (e) of section 54953, and that the Legislative Bodies shall continue to comply with the requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of section 54953 as a consequence of the ongoing state of emergency and the continued social distancing measures required by local officials.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. Affirmation that Local Emergency Persists. The City Council hereby considers the conditions of the state of emergency pursuant to Government Code section 8625 and proclaims that a local emergency persists throughout the City, affirms the Sacramento Health Order’s required and recommended measures to promote social distancing, and finds that the conditions continue to exist pursuant to Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to allow the Legislative Bodies to use teleconferencing to hold public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(2) to ensure members of the public have continued access to safely observe and participate in local government meetings.

Section 3. Remote Teleconference Meetings. City Staff are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, continuing to conduct open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 4. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) February 16, 2023 or such time the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies of City may continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of section 54953.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova, this 17th day of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

ITEM 16.6. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 3 of 3 NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Linda Budge, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 1

ITEM 17.1.

DATE: January 17, 2023

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Dalia Fadl, Principal Engineer

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA'S ADJUSTED STORM DRAINAGE IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2023

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution approving the Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would approve the 2023 Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule.

BACKGROUND

The City's Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program was established in 2020 through the City Council's adoption of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code (RCMC) Chapter 16.95. The City started collecting fees under this program in March 2021. The fees collected as part of the Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program facilitate new development through construction of major drainage infrastructure that provides regional benefits, while mitigating development impacts of the City’s drainage system. The fees are paid by developers and collected at the project approval phase.

On an annual basis, the impact fees are adjusted to account for inflation based on the Engineering News - Record (ENR) index. This year the adjustment is 5.20%. In addition, credits and reimbursements pursuant to RCMC 16.95.110 and 16.95.120 are adjusted annually.

The 2023 Storm Drainage Impact Fee schedule (Attachment 2) includes a table showing the proposed fees that will take effect immediately upon approval of this resolution.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

The proposed Resolution would have no impact on the General Fund. Funds collected pursuant to the Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program will be used for City storm drain improvements.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - 2023 Drainage Impact Fees

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 1

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ADJUSTED STORM DRAINAGE IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2023

WHEREAS, the City separated from Sacramento County's Zone 11 drainage fee program and created a Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program in 2020; and

WHEREAS, City Council Adopted Municipal Code Chapter No. 16.95 Establishing The City's Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program In October 2020; and

WHEREAS, the City started implementing the new Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program in March 2021; and

WHEREAS, annually in January, the City will update the drainage impact fee schedule to account for inflation based on the Engineering News-Record Index, and this year the increase is

5.20%; and

WHEREAS, the adjusted 2023 Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule is included in Exhibit A.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA adopts the 2023 Storm Drainage Impact Fee Schedule.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 17th day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Linda Budge, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Percent
Impervious Base Fee/Acre Admin Fee/ Acre
Total
Fee/Acre
Commercial/Office/Retail1
70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
Industrial 70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
High Density Residential
RMH 75% 26,390.47$ 1,056.21$ 27,447$
RD-302
70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
RD-25 70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
RD-20 70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
Medium Density Residential
RD-15 70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
RD-10 60% 21,111.54$ 844.76$ 21,956$
RD-7 50% 17,592.60$ 703.79$ 18,296$
RD-6 40% 14,074.71$ 562.82$ 14,638$
Low Density Residential
RD-5 40% 14,074.71$ 562.82$ 14,638$
RD-4 38% 13,370.92$ 534.42$ 13,905$
RD-3 33% 11,436.29$ 456.57$ 11,893$
RD-2 28% 9,676.30$ 386.08$ 10,062$
RD-1 25% 8,796.82$ 352.42$ 9,149$
AR-1 17% 5,981.67$ 238.80$ 6,220$
AR-2 10% 3,517.89$ 140.97$ 3,659$
AR-5 10% 3,517.89$ 140.97$ 3,659$
AR-10 10% 3,517.89$ 140.97$ 3,659$
Mowed grass with graded and piped to drain 20% 7,036.83$ 281.94$ 7,319$ Mowed grass with no piped drainage 10% 3,517.89$ 140.97$ 3,659$ Impervious Area Park2
75% 26,390.47$ 1,056.21$ 27,447$
School Campus with detention 25% 8,796.82$ 352.42$ 9,149$ School Campus 50% 17,592.60$ 703.79$ 18,296$
1 2 A school or park that detains greater than 50% of peak flow value, at the discretion of the City, may reduce the fee by 50%.

NOTICE OF UPDATED FEE 1-1-2023
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Storm Drainage Impact Fees will automatically be adjusted in January by averaging the percentage change in the 20-City and San Francisco Construction Cost Index (CCI) as reported by Engineering New Record (ENR) for the twelve-month period ending in October of the prior year.

Storm Drainage Impact Fees
Impervious area for Commercial and Industrial reduced to reflect the use of Low Impact Development (LID) practices, meeting HMP requirements and increased landscaping standards. Actual fees may vary if LID not utilized P:\Public Works\Water Resources\16 - Drainage Impact Fee_Zone 11\2019 Detachment Efforts\Fee Collection\Fees & Credit Tables\2023\2023 Draingage Impact Fees ITEM 17.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 9

MEMORANDUM
ITEM 18.1.

DATE:January 17, 2023
TO:Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:Nicholas Sosa, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: LOGISTICENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW – PROJECT NO. PLND-1021-0015
PROPERTY OWNER:

DPML Bear Hollow, LLC
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER:

Dermody Properties
George Condon
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502
PROJECT: Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova – Major Design Review FILE: PLND-1021-0015
LOCATION: Corner of Bear Hollow Drive and N. Mather Boulevard APN: 072-2360-041-0000
PLANNER: Nicholas Sosa, Associate Planner

RECOMMENDATION
There is no Staff recommendation at this time.

Staff is providing a response to Council’s concerns that were raised at the December 5, 2022 Council meeting and responding to additional information from the applicant and the applicant’s attorney. Staff will be seeking additional direction from Council for this project. The public hearing will be continued to a future Council date. At that time, staff may bring back documents for possible final action based upon Council’s direction.

PROJECT BACKGROUND
The project was previously presented on December 5, 2022, at the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting. After City Council was presented the project, there were requests for:

A. additional modifications to the building to create a more office building feel for the design;
B. additional renderings for the project from various locations within the vicinity of the site; C. further consideration by the applicant about possible limits of operating hours and required truck routes for the project; and

City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 9
D. analysis regarding what the definition of a warehouse was at the time of the development agreement and how that relates to today’s warehouse standards.

The project was then continued to the January 17th meeting to provide adequate time for Staff to work with the developer on addressing these concerns. The applicant has provided revised project elevations and renderings and additional research has been conducted to respond to questions directed toward Staff. The attorney for the applicant also submitted letters to the City Council on November 29 and December 14 which are discussed in part below. An additional letter from the applicant’s attorney was received on January 10th. The letter was not received in time to provide a response in the staff report. However, the City Attorney will address the letter at the hearing.

1. The Council requested to have the building portray more of an office building look with more articulation and horizontal window paneling and to minimize the look of a long monolithic building through variations of color, height, and articulation.

Such requested changes would be consistent with specific provisions of the SPA design guidelines:

A. “Building form should avoid proportionally long, flat surfaces. Architecture on non- residential buildings should include columns, indentations, overhangs, patios, trellises, and surface textures, on all elevations visible off-site…Large areas of blank walls with few openings or details should be avoided on facades facing streets or public spaces.” (Villages of Zinfandel SPA DG, pg 23.)
B. “Building elevations must be attractively designed on all four sides. Walls at interior property lines or project phase lines must be given specific design attention, with color, physical relief, and/or landscaping. Backs and sides of buildings visible from public streets should incorporate window and door openings.” (Villages of Zinfandel SPA DG, pg 24.)
C. “Variation in the shape, color, and texture of roof structures should be used to create diversity and interest…Flat, monotonous surfaces shall be avoided.” (Villages of Zinfandel SPA DG, pg 24.)
The Applicant has submitted revised elevations that include additional windows to create more visual variation and articulation and more of an office space look. The proposed windows are larger and occupy more of the façade along Bear Hollow Drive and N. Mather Boulevard. The Applicant has also incorporated additional roof variation on the facades facing Bear Hollow and N. Mather that show a maximum height of 40 feet to highlight windowed areas with other parapet areas showing a 3-foot drop at 37 feet in height. On the west elevation, the applicant has provided a slight roofline variation, but has not added details to the large blank facades above the truck bays. The comparison of the project’s original submittal with their revised current submittal can be seen in Figures 1 and 2.

City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 9
Figure 1: Original Submittal
Figure 2: Current Submittal

City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 9

2. The Council also requested additional renderings of the project from locations within the vicinity of the project site.

The Council’s request for additional renderings included areas such as Navigator Elementary School and the Veranda subdivision. The renderings below provide a perspective from each of the marked locations of what the built environment would be at project completion. Given these distances, it is difficult for staff to comment on the compatibility of the structure with the surrounding area as the aesthetic impact of the structure within the provided image is minimal. It is also important to note that these photographic renderings show the site and surrounding properties as they stand today and does not include any future proposed projects that may be currently under review or projects that could be potentially submitted that could significantly alter the visibility of the structure from these viewpoints.

Figure 3: From Queens Arbor at Elementary School
National Guard HQ

City Council Staff Report – Page 5 of 9
Figure 4: From Portico Circle in Veranda

3. The Council also mentioned larger, more mature trees at installation for the project landscaping to mask/screen the building.

The Applicant has been working with the City’s Arborist as well as their own landscape architect and have provided the largest trees at installation as possible without sacrificing the future health and performance of the trees. The project proposes (141) 24-inch box trees, (28) 36-inch box trees, and (36) 48-inch box trees. The landscape plan places the largest 48-inch box trees in areas that would provide the most screening of the building.

This landscape plan was described in detail as part of the December 5th staff report (see attachment 1). No modifications have been made to the landscape plan as part of this resubmittal.

4. The applicant has already agreed to Conditions of Approval that would significantly limit operation of semi-trucks, and truck routes. This was discussed in the December 5th staff report and presented at the hearing, but a summary of those improvements are listed below.

The site is conditioned and designed to direct truck trips to US-50 via two routes:
•North Mather to Zinfandel Drive then US-50.
•North Mather to Mather, Femoyer, International, Mather Field Road then US-50.

In their existing state, traffic on these routes is generally free flowing except during peak hours in the vicinity of interchanges (approaching freeway 50 north of White Rock on National Guard HQ

City Council Staff Report – Page 6 of 9
Zinfandel, and north of Rockingham on Mather Field). Congestion in the vicinity of urban interchanges is common in the region and state.

Design elements incorporated into the project include an angled driveway that directs trucks south on Bear Hollow directly to North Mather. And the project is conditioned to construct bulb-outs at the intersection of Bear Hollow with Air Park, Robola and Auvernat. The proposed bulb-outs will narrow the road resulting in further deterrent to trucks driving this corridor, reduced speeds for all vehicles, and greater protection for pedestrians.

5. Response to assertions of applicant’s attorneys.

A. The City is implementing design standards that were adopted at the same time as the zoning that allows warehouse uses, the City is not imposing any later enacted requirements or conditions.

A warehouse being an allowed use on this site does not mean that the currently proposed design complies with the design standards and must be approved. The use table and Design Guidelines work in concert. The project must comply with both.

B. The applicant’s attorneys misstates or does not address critical design provisions and requirements of the SPA.

The warehouse design standards are those that were in effect when the SPA and DA were adopted in 2003, not those in the 2020 Commercial Real Estate Development Association “Rules of Thumb for Distribution/Warehouse Facilities Design” cited by the applicant’s attorneys.

The applicants, not the City, have introduced evidence of warehouse design from after the date the Development Agreement and SPA were approved.

The applicant’s attorneys cite to a Rule of Thumb for Distribution/ Warehouse Facilities Design noting that “to support modern logistics uses, buildings of 150,000 square feet and greater should provide 36-foot interior clearance, which requires an exterior height of approximately 40 feet” (December 14 letter, footnote 7) The applicant’s attorney does not point to any section of the SPA or design standards from 2002 or contemporaneous sources to establish that any warehouse use requires a 36-foot internal clearance for the entire structure.

C. The applicant’s attorneys do not address how the building form avoids long flat surfaces, an objective design standard present in the SPA1.

The City has the discretion to require a design conforming to this standard in the SPA.

D. The City has the discretion to require design modifications to all four sides of the building and all elevations, contrary to the assertion from the applicant’s attorneys’ that 1 “Building form should avoid proportionally long, flat surfaces. Architecture on non-residential buildings should include columns, indentations, overhangs, patios, trellises, and surface textures, on all elevations visible off- site…Large areas of black walls with few openings or details should be avoided on facades facing streets or public spaces.” (Villages of Zinfandel SPA, DG pg 23.)

City Council Staff Report – Page 7 of 9
it is not required to “make aesthetic changes to ‘all four sides’ of the Project’s elevations”.

The SPA Design Guidelines specifically provide the City with the authority in two separate sections to require such aesthetic changes on all four sides of the project building. The SPA states “[b]uilding elevations must be attractively designed on all four sides” and “[a]rchitecture on non-residential buildings should include columns, indentations, overhangs, patios, trellises, and surface textures, on all elevations visible off-site.” (Villages of Zinfandel SPA DG, pgs 23-24.) The applicant’s attorneys assert that the City does not have the discretion to impose both aesthetic modifications on all four sides as well as requiring landscaping that shields the enormity of the building from view, however this assertion is contrary to the intent of the Design Guidelines as each design modification is not mutually exclusive.

The City may impose design modifications as necessary to bring the project into compliance with the design standards. Landscaping is not a substitute for compliance with these building design standards. Even the best landscaping cannot permanently and immediately achieve what building design accomplishes, including avoidance of “proportionally long, flat surfaces” and “[v]ariation in the shape, color and texture of roof structures”.

The Council may wish to consider in particular the articulation, design details of the west elevation.

E. Roof lines on all sides should be articulated and varied.

The SPA states “[v]ariation in the shape, color, and texture of roof structures should be used to create diversity and interest…Flat, monotonous surfaces shall be avoided.” (SPA DG pg 24) In their November 29th letter, the applicant’s attorneys assert that “the City has no legal authority to deny the Project or to condition approval on Dermody’s agreement to reduce the building height”. Unsupported by any cited legally authority and seemingly ignoring this roof design standard, the applicant’s attorneys thus appear to take the position, that in implementing this standard, the City could not cause any even slight reduction of the proposed height of any portion of the project roof line, even in portions that may be flat, monotonous and unvaried contrary to this standard.

F. Project site is different in location, surroundings, and requirements from other nearby commercial sites.

The project site is situated in an area with the National Guard Headquarters to the north and west, Mater airport to the south and a vacant parcel to the east. The specific project location is not adjacent to residential uses or other commercial sites. Similar uses on other locations within the VZSPA have different built environments that may hold those uses to more stringent development standards.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova Major Design Review would be exempt from CEQA review under CEQA State Guidelines Section 15183. This exempts from CEQA projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified, except as

City Council Staff Report – Page 8 of 9
might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The project is located within the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area (VOZSPA). An EIR was certified by the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors in 1998 for the VOZSPA. Additionally, a Supplemental EIR was prepared and certified by the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors in 2002 for the plan area.

The Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova Major Design Review involves development of a 155,040 square foot industrial shell building with parking and loading docks. The development also includes landscaping, drainage, and required screening/fencing for a loading dock area. The business and professional park (BP) site was identified in the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area EIR and uses contemplated within the BP designation include those uses listed in the Sacramento County Zoning Code under the BP and MP (Industrial Office Park) use tables located in Chapter 25 and Chapter 30. Warehousing is a permitted by right uses as listed in Table IV I.3.

Additional supplemental technical studies were prepared to further support that no additional project related impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. These technical studies include additional traffic analysis, as well as a noise study. The traffic analysis results were summarized under the Traffic Improvements section of the December 5th staff report. The noise study that was completed concluded that noise levels associated with the project generated on- site operations would satisfy the General Plan noise criteria at the nearest existing residential uses. This is due in part to existing solid noise barriers in the vicinity, as well as overall on-site operational practices.

As this Major Design Review is consistent with the Special Planning Area and the environmental documentation prepared for the Special Planning Area, it is exempt from CEQA review. So long as the project does not have any project-specific significant effects peculiar to the Major Design Review and not identified in the previous environmental documentation, the project is exempt and no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required. The project applicant is requesting approval of a Major Design Review for the proposed project. Additionally, under CEQA, the City lacks the discretion under the Major Design Review approval process to consider environmental effects not related to the design of the Project, including, but not limited to human health impacts from toxic air contaminants, greenhouse gas emissions, and impacts of biological resources.

NEXT STEPS
Upon conclusion of the presentation and public testimony, City Council could do one of the following:

1. Direct staff to return at a later City Council meeting with final action documents

2. Direct the applicant to make additional modifications to the proposed project.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Staff Report dated December 5, 2022

2. Project Plans

3. DRAFT Project Conditions

4. Letter from Miller Starr Regalia dated October 3, 2022

5. Letter from Miller Starr Regalia dated November 29, 2022

6. Letter from Miller Starr Regalia dated December 14, 2022

City Council Staff Report – Page 9 of 9

7. Letter from Miller Starr Regalia dated January 10, 2023

8. Presentation

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 13

MEMORANDUM
DATE:December 5, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:Nicholas Sosa, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: LOGISTICENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA - MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW – PROJECT NO. PLND-1021-0015
PROPERTY OWNER:

DPML Bear Hollow, LLC
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER:

Dermody Properties
George Condon
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502
PROJECT: Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova – Major Design Review FILE: PLND-1021-0015
LOCATION: Corner of Bear Hollow Drive and N. Mather Boulevard APN: 072-2360-041-0000
PLANNER: Nicholas Sosa, Associate Planner

RECOMMENDATION
There is no staff recommendation at this time. Staff is providing a response to public comment received as well as Council’s concerns that were raised at the July 18th Council meeting and will be looking for any additional direction from Council for this project. The requested Major Design Review is within the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area (VOZSPA) and therefore applicable design standards listed within the VOZSPA would be utilized to determine approval or denial of the project. This meeting is intended to discuss the project in detail regarding these standards and provide direction to Staff to return to Council with a final resolution based upon that discussion, at a later date. As a result of the holiday City Council schedule, the public hearing will be continued to the January 17, 2023 City Council meeting. At that time, staff may bring back draft documents for possible final action based upon Council’s direction.

VILLAGES OF ZINFANDEL SPECIAL PLANNING AREA BACKGROUND
The Project, Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova, is located within the VOZSPA. The Special Planning Area was approved in 2002 by Sacramento County. The VOZSPA includes residential, commercial, business professional, light industrial, parks, bike trails, and open space uses. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared, which took into consideration full build out impacts of the VOZSPA, including biological, noise, traffic, and utilities. The EIR was certified for the Special Planning Area in 1998 by Sacramento County and a Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program was adopted.

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 13
When the VOZSPA was adopted, the property owners entered into a Development Agreement with Sacramento County, which had jurisdiction over the planning area at the time. This Development Agreement created vested rights for the property owner which effectively solidified all regulations and developments standards at that time (2003) to be applicable within the VOZSPA for the life of the twenty-year term of the development agreement. At the time that these rights were vested by the County in favor of the property owners, the VOZSPA and 2003 Sacramento County Zoning Code were the applicable documents and therefore continue to be the regulatory documents utilized for permitted and conditionally permitted uses and development standards such as building size, setbacks, landscaping, and parking for projects under review today. The standards in the City of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code, including the standards for Major Design Review in Section 23.141 are subordinate to and cannot be applied in conflict with the VOZSPA or the County Code. Under the Development Agreement only City standards that do not “prevent development of the Property to the uses, and to the density, or intensity of development” and “do not negatively impact the timing or rate of development of the Property” can be applied to the Project. (DA Section 2.4) In addition to the vested rights established by the property’s Development Agreement, the Villages of Zinfandel’s allowed uses and development standards are further limited by the Mather Field Airport’s overflight zone which is “governed” by the Sacramento Area of Council of Governments and the Mather Airport Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan includes limitations based upon a property’s proximity to the airport. Areas that are most restrictive are those within the flight safety zones which are within the direct approach/departure flight paths of the runway.

These areas are limited in both use and construction to minimize potential destruction if an accident should occur. The Land Use Plan also includes “Sound Contours” which are areas of excessive noise from the approach and departure of planes on the runway. The noise levels in these areas range from 75-60 decibel’s which further dictates allowed uses within the area as these noise levels would not be appropriate for certain uses such as office space or residential housing which has a limitation of a maximum of 55 decibels. The proposed project is located partially within one noise contour level, the 65-decibel noise contour. The Land Use Plan of the airport in conjunction with the vested rights of property owners in the Villages of Zinfandel SPA are both utilized in reviewing projects to determine which uses are allowed within certain areas of the VOZSPA and which development standards are applicable to each project.

PROJECT HISTORY
The Applicant submitted an application on October 25, 2021, for a 155,040 square foot shell building called Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova which includes a loading dock area, commercial parking, and additional site improvements located at the intersection of Bear Hollow Drive and N. Mather Boulevard. The project site is zoned Business and Professional Office (BP) within the Zinfandel Special Planning Area (VOZSPA) and is surrounded by other office and industrial uses as shown in Figure 1 and listed in Table 1 below.

Figure 1: Project Location

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 13
Table 1: Surrounding Designations and Existing Uses
Location Existing Use
General Plan
Designation Zoning Designation
Subject Site Undeveloped lot
Office Mixed Use
(OMU)
Business Professional Zinfandel
Special Planning Area (BP

VOZSPA)
Northwest
California Military
Department Consolidated
Headquarters
Office Mixed Use
(OMU)
Business Professional Zinfandel
Special Planning Area (BP

VOZSPA)
Northeast Undeveloped Lot
Office Mixed Use
(OMU)
Business Professional Zinfandel
Special Planning Area (BP

VOZSPA)
South
Mather Air Force Base
(County) / Detention
Basin
Airport (County) /
Open Space
Mather Airport (County) and Open
Space Zinfandel Special Planning
Area (O VOZSPA)
The proposed project included a 155,040 SF building oriented with frontage along N. Mather Boulevard and side frontage along Bear Hollow Drive. The site provides a total of 3 access points to the property, one along N. Mather and two along Bear Hollow. This project is only for a shell building and does not include specific uses at this time and therefore no use permits have been included with this project. As a shell building, the project has been reviewed as a “wholesaling and warehousing” use which is permitted by right within the BP zoning designation of the VOZSPA. Any future tenants that are not permitted by right at this location will be required to obtain the appropriate use permits from the Planning Department and will be subject to additional review at that time.

The Applicant held their initial neighborhood meeting on November 16, 2021, at 6:00PM via zoom and responded to minor concerns that were proposed at the meeting regarding lighting and noise which were adequately addressed by the Applicant.

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 13
The project was then presented at City Council on April 18, 2022, at the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting. After City Council was presented the project, there were some concerns with the bulk and massing of the building and staff was directed to work with the applicant to utilize additional landscaping to help mask the massing. Concern was also raised regarding direction of the truck traffic to and from the subject property. Staff was directed to continue to work with the Applicant to resolve these concerns and return to Council with an updated project.

City Staff held a community meeting at City Hall on June 27, 2022, to provide the Stone Creek Community a better understanding of the history of the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area, regulatory documents applicable to this site, as well as all other sites in the SPA, and the extent of Staff’s ability to regulate these projects. Over 150 residents attended the meeting.

Attendees provided both questions and concerns, that were addressed by Staff and the original developer/property owner of the Villages of Zinfandel. Concerns that arose at the community meeting revolved around overall truck traffic throughout the area as well as the potential air quality effects of the added truck traffic.

Staff worked with the Applicant to address their concerns and the project was presented back to City Council on July 18, 2022. The project included additional large stature trees for landscape screening for the loading dock area both along Bear Hollow and the elevated bike trail. The revised project also included additional conditions of approval for restrictions on truck routes as well as a requirement for additional signage directing trucks to use N. Mather only as shown in green in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Allowed Truck Access Route

CURRENT PROJECT

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 5 of 13
Since the July 18th City Council meeting, an additional neighborhood meeting was held by the Applicant on September 7, 2022, at 5:30PM here at City Hall. The meeting was held with stations highlighting various aspects of the project including traffic, architecture, and landscaping. Each station included a topic expert to help explain the project in detail for residents. From the meeting, there were still concerns regarding traffic and landscaping. To help address these concerns, the most recent submittal has provided modifications to the tree sizes and species on-site, modifications to the façade of the building, modifications to the parking lot, driveway and entrances, as well as off-site improvements to help mitigate potential impacts to the area from the facility.

Updated Façade Designs/Building Form
As previously mentioned, the project is located within the VOZSPA and therefore must adhere to applicable non-residential development standards and architectural guidelines listed within that Special Planning Area. As part of their most recent submittal, the Applicant has added revisions to their project to accommodate the required design guidelines. The Applicable guidelines can be found in Section 5; Subsection (D). Key elements regarding Building Form have also been summarized below.
•“Bulk of building massing generally should be minimized especially where residential character predominates”.
oThe nearest residential neighborhood to the project site is 930 ft. to the east, to the Veranda subdivision and 790 ft. to the north. The National Guard Headquarters building is located immediately north of the project site and includes one large building and a few smaller ancillary buildings totaling 285,000 sq. ft. These building have no roof or wall articulation. •“Buildings should maintain a scale compatible with residential neighborhoods” oThe proposed project is for a single building that is approximately 155,040 square feet in size. Other recently constructed buildings in the area include the Bold and Beauty building located at the intersection of Zinfandel Drive and N.

Mather Boulevard which is approximately 164,000 square feet with parapets ranging from 37’ (for a majority of the building) with a max height of 46’-4” (at three architectural tower features) and the CA National Guard Headquarters adjacent to this property which is approximately 238,000 square feet for its main building at a height of approximately 39-feet tall.
oThe maximum height listed in section 325-04 of the 2003 Sacramento County Zoning Code is 40-feet. However, the project must meet the required design guidelines.
•“Building masses should be mitigated by elements such as canopies or trellises designed to focus attention on smaller-scaled elements of the building” oThe project incorporates metal canopies at storefront entrances as well as architectural trellises along large facades visible from Bear Hollow Drive and N.

Mather Boulevard.

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 6 of 13
•“Indentations, or other means of articulation, should be used to a avoid monolithic effect.”
oThe updated facades have incorporated additional roofline articulation with parapets steps at a maximum height of 40-feet and lower areas at 38-feet along public right of way elevations.
•“Building form should avoid proportionally long, flat surfaces”, “Flat monotonous surfaces shall be avoided.”
oAs proposed, the building incorporates some relief by utilizing canopies and inset vertical panels.
•“Architecture on non-residential buildings should include columns, indentations, overhangs patios, trellises, and surface textures, on all elevations visible off-site” oThe project includes metal canopies at storefront entrances at the southwest corner as well as the southeast corner. Trellis features have also been incorporated along long facades facing N. Mather Boulevard and Bear Hollow Drive.
oThe project has also included a dark gray inset panels and windows along visible extensive facades to break up large blank walls.
•“Storefronts should wrap around corners to create a sense of transparency and activity at intersections”
oThe projects storefront entrances wrap around corners of facades. •“Large areas of blank walls with few openings or details should be avoided on facades facing streets or public spaces”
oThe project has added visible dark gray inset panels to the project to accompany vertical windows along large areas of the facades visible by the Public.

The applicant has provided elevations and renderings that portray the design modifications that are detailed in the above section as well as a detailed image of the proposed landscaping at time of installation and 6-10 years from now. These renderings can be seen in Figures 3-5 below.

Figure 3: Visibility from N. Mather Blvd & Bear Hollow Drive

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 7 of 13
Figure 4: Visibility at Southeast Corner Close Up
Building Rendering with Landscaping at Install
Building Rendering with Landscaping at 6-10 Years
Building Rendering with Landscaping at Install

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 8 of 13
Figure 5: Visibility from Bear Hollow Drive
Building Rendering with Landscaping at 6-10 Years
Building Rendering with Landscaping at Install

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 9 of 13
Landscaping Modifications
At the July 18th meeting, residents still voiced concerns regarding landscaping along Bear Hollow Drive and N. Mather Drive. The project includes a 12-foot screen wall at this location, however, rather than increase the height of the wall, the project proposed a more natural landscape screening of trees and shrubs that would minimize visibility of the truck area in the rear at approximately 10 years in the future. Concerns were raised in regard to the size of the landscaping and the time that would be required for the landscaping to complete its intended purpose of screening the loading dock area and commercial truck parking area at the north end of the property. As part of this most recent submittal, the Applicant has modified the proposed species of the trees and has also increased the initial proposed sizes of the trees and density of the plantings to speed up the screening ability of the landscaping.

Building Rendering with Landscaping at 6-10 Years

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 10 of 13
Figure 6: Landscape Tree Size Map
The Applicant has worked with the City’s Arborist to determine the best species of trees as well as the most appropriate number of trees throughout the site that would result with the desired outcome while still maintaining the necessary growth spacing and separation.

There is a total of thirty-six, 48-inch box trees placed strategically in areas that would require the most screening such as along public rights of way and the existing bike trail to the southwest of the site. Other proposed trees include twenty-eight, 36-inch box trees and one-hundred forty- one, 24-inch box trees. These trees have been added in areas that are unable to accommodate a 48-inch box tree and areas that would increase the overall density of the landscaping to provide a thorough screening. In speaking with the City Arborist, the proposed density of trees shown in Figure 6 would be the maximum that the site would be able to accommodate with minimal overcrowding of canopies. Overcrowding can lead to several future concerns that could hinder the performance of the tree. The City’s Arborist has listed a few of those potential issues below.
•Trees planted too close together can result in narrow misshapen canopies with weak branching and poorly tapered trunks as the trees are not receiving enough sunlight.

Long-term survival is much less likely for weakened trees •There is more competition for available water and nutrients and many of the trees are likely to grow slower and possibly fail to thrive.
•Overcrowded trees are more prone to pests and diseases. Poor air circulation from crowded canopies favors fungal diseases such as powdery mildew. Aphid and mite

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 11 of 13
infestations are also common in crowded conditions. The 23 proposed London Plane trees are very susceptible to all of these pests and diseases.

The diagram shown in Figure 6 portrays the largest possible trees on-site as well as the largest number of trees possible (a total of 205, most of which are evergreen) without overcrowding the site. The Applicant has also provided updated renderings showing what the proposed landscaping would look like at installation as well as 10 years into the future (See Figures 3 through 5)
Traffic Improvements
Trip generation for this site is estimated by KD Anderson & Associates to be 217 to 755 trips per day depending on the ultimate use of the site. Peak hours are estimated to be up to 115 trips in the morning hour and 101 trips in the afternoon hour. Of the daily trips, it is estimated that 34 to 93 will be trucks.

The site is conditioned and designed to direct truck trips to US-50 via two routes:
•North Mather to Zinfandel Drive then US-50.
•North Mather to Mather, Femoyer, International, Mather Field Road then US-50.

In their existing state, traffic on these routes is generally free flowing except during peak hours in the vicinity of interchanges (approaching freeway 50 north of White Rock on Zinfandel, and north of Rockingham on Mather Field). Congestion in the vicinity of urban interchanges is common in the region and state.

Light industrial uses generate less trips than office/residential/retail use and their trips are spread throughout the day (trip generation from light industrial is about 50% of that generated by office). Therefore, warehouse/light industrial uses contribute less to congestion than other uses. Additional traffic from the proposed project is not projected to significantly change the level of service on these roads in the short or long term. And the estimated trip generations are consistent with assumptions of the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area.

Truck traffic results in greater wear on roads compared to passenger vehicle traffic. The project is conditioned to annex into the City’s community facilities district for street and lighting maintenance, including a load factor to account for truck trips. The estimated tax for fair-share street and lighting maintenance at this site is approximately $10,500 per year.

Design elements incorporated into the project include an angled driveway that directs trucks south on Bear Hollow directly to North Mather. And the project is conditioned to construct bulb- outs at the intersection of Bear Hollow with Air Park, Robola and Auvernat. The proposed bulb- outs will narrow the road resulting in further deterrent to trucks driving this corridor, reduced speeds for all vehicles, and greater protection for pedestrians.

In addition to the site-specific analysis, staff analyzed the assumptions of the 2002 environmental impact report relative to current traffic models and development that has occurred through 2022. Staff findings are that the actual development being realized for existing, proposed, and planned developments in the SPA is lower than what was identified in 2002 planning documents. Roadways were planned and built to accommodate traffic based on the projections in 2002. With the lower regional, area, and project specific trip generations, it is expected that there will be sufficient roadway capacity. The interchanges with US 50 have existing peak hour congestion which is expected to continue into the future. These changes in

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 12 of 13
realized development are lessening the expected future deficiencies at interchanges relative to projections in the 2002 environmental impact report.

Resident Frequently Asked Questions
The application was originally submitted in October of 2021. Over the course of the project, both Staff and City Council have received numerous correspondence from the community with inquiries on the details of the project, the status of the review, and the standards and regulations applicable, as well as correspondence voicing direct opposition to the project. Many of the questions presented by the community were similar or overlapped other questions that we may have received from other community members. Therefore, in an effort to provide a response to all community members that is consistent and available to everyone, Staff has created a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) sheet that addresses a majority of the common questions that we’ve received. This FAQ sheet has been included as Attachment 3. It is important to note that the questions that have been addressed do not include any questions that require a final determination of the project or questions that imply approval or denial of the proposal. These questions can only be answered at the public hearing of the decision-making body, which for this project, would be City Council.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova Major Design Review would be exempt from CEQA review under CEQA State Guidelines Section 15183. This exempts from CEQA projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The project is located within the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area (VOZSPA). An EIR was certified by the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors in 1998 for the VOZSPA. Additionally, a Supplemental EIR was prepared and certified by the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors in 2002 for the plan area.

The Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova Major Design Review involves development of a 155,040 square foot industrial shell building with parking and loading docks. The development also includes landscaping, drainage, and required screening/fencing for a loading dock area. The business and professional park (BP) site was identified in the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area EIR and uses contemplated within the BP designation include those uses listed in the Sacramento County Zoning Code under the BP and MP (Industrial Office Park) use tables located in Chapter 25 and Chapter 30. Warehousing is a permitted by right uses as listed in Table IV I.3.

Additional supplemental technical studies were prepared to further support that no additional project related impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. These technical studies include additional traffic analysis, as well as a noise study. The traffic analysis results were summarized under the Traffic Improvements section of this staff report. The noise study concluded that noise levels associated with the project generated on-site operations would satisfy the General Plan noise criteria at the nearest existing residential uses. This is due in part to existing solid noise barriers in the vicinity, as well as overall on-site operational practices.

As this Major Design Review is consistent with the Special Planning Area and the environmental documentation prepared for the Special Planning Area, it is exempt from CEQA review. So long as the project does not have any project-specific significant effects peculiar to the Major Design

ITEM 18.1. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Staff Report – Page 13 of 13
Review and not identified in the previous environmental documentation, the project is exempt and no environmental document pursuant to CEQA is required. The project applicant is requesting approval of a Major Design Review for the proposed project. Additionally, under CEQA, the City lacks the discretion under the Major Design Review approval process to consider environmental effects not related to the design of the Project, including, but not limited to human health impacts from toxic air contaminants, greenhouse gas emissions, and impacts of biological resources.

NEXT STEPS
Upon conclusion of the presentation and public testimony, City Council could do one of the following:

1. Direct staff to return at a later City Council meeting with final action documents

2. Direct the applicant to make additional modifications to the proposed project.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Project Plans

2. DRAFT Project Conditions

3. Frequently Asked Questions

4. Presentation

5. Letter from Miller Starr Regalia dated November 29, 2022

LOGISTIC CENTER AT

RANCHO CORDOVA

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
SNR21-0064-00

10.03.2022
TOTAL PAGES IN THIS PACKAGE: 12
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

00.00.2021
XXX00-0000-00
Conceptual Site Plan
Address
scheme:

City, State 1
PAGE
2 10.03.2022LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

PAGE
3 10.03.2022LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
N. MATHER BLVD - LANDSCAPING @INSTALL
This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

PAGE
4 10.03.2022LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
N. MATHER BLVD - LANDSCPING @6 - 10 YEARS
This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

PAGE
5 10.03.2022LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
SOUTHEAST CORNER CLOSE UP - LANDSCAPING @INSTALL
This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

PAGE
6 10.03.2022LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
SOUTHEAST CORNER CLOSE UP - LANDSCAPING @6 - 10 YEARS
This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Revised Bear Hollow Rendering
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Final Bear Hollow Drive Rendering
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bear Hollow Drive
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Current Elevations

TOP OF PARAPET
40'-0"

TOP OF PARAPET
38'-0"

CLEAR HEIGHT
32'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

GLASS HEIGHT
26'-0"

TOP OF PARAPET
41'-6"
39'-6"

TOP OF PARAPET

TOP OF PARAPET
40'-0"

TOP OF PARAPET
38'-0"

CLEAR HEIGHT
32'-0"

TOP OF WALL
12'-0"

GLASS HEIGHT
26'-0"

TOP OF PARAPET
41'-6"
39'-6"

TOP OF PARAPET

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF PARAPET
39'-6"

CLEAR HEIGHT
32'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

TOP OF PARAPET
38'-0"

CLEAR HEIGHT
32'-0"

FINISHED FLOOR
0'-0"

GLASS HEIGHT
26'-0"
39'-6"

TOP OF PARAPET
40'-0"

TOP OF PARAPET

EAST ELEVATION

NORTH ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION

NORTH ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION

TOP OF PARAPET
40’-0”

FINISHED FLOOR
0’-0”

GLASS HEIGHT
26’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
37’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
38’-6”

CLEAR HEIGHT
32’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
40’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
39’-6”

TOP OF PARAPET
38’-6”

TOP OF PARAPET
38’-0”

TOP OF WALL
12’-0”

FINISHED FLOOR
0’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
40’-0”

FINISHED FLOOR
0’-0”

GLASS HEIGHT
26’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
38’-6”

CLEAR HEIGHT
32’-0”

FINISHED FLOOR
0’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
39’-6”

CLEAR HEIGHT
32’-0”
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7009

PEARLY WHITE
1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2849

WESTCHESTER GRAY
2 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7069

IRON ORE
3 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6804

DIGNITY BLUE
4 EAST ELEVATION

NORTH ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION

TOP OF PARAPET
40’-0”

FINISHED FLOOR
0’-0”

GLASS HEIGHT
26’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
37’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
38’-6”

CLEAR HEIGHT
32’-0”
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7009

PEARLY WHITE
1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2849

WESTCHESTER GRAY
2 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7069

IRON ORE
3 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6804

DIGNITY BLUE
4 TOP OF PARAPET
40’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
39’-6”

TOP OF PARAPET
38’-6”

TOP OF PARAPET
38’-0”

TOP OF WALL
12’-0”

FINISHED FLOOR
0’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
40’-0”

FINISHED FLOOR
0’-0”

GLASS HEIGHT
26’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
38’-6”

CLEAR HEIGHT
32’-0”

FINISHED FLOOR
0’-0”

TOP OF PARAPET
39’-6”

CLEAR HEIGHT
32’-0”
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
L-2
N O R T H S C A L E: 1" = 50' - 0"
0 25 50 100

N O R T H

CONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLAN
FC
BA
21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

DATE REMARKS
architecture
planning
interiors
graphics
civil engineering
4683 Chabot Dr #300
Pleasanton, CA 94588
P 925.244.9620
F 925.244.9621
JOB NO.:

DRAWN BY.:

PA/PM:

SHEET
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 12-14-2021 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

RANCHO CORDOVA
Use of the plans and specifications contained
herein shall be restricted to the original site for
which they were prepared; publication thereof is
expressly limited to such use. Reproduction,
publication, or reuse by any method, in whole or
in part, without the express written consent of ima
is prohibited. Title to said plans remains the sole
property of ima; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.

SIGNATURE
DATE
01-21-2022 2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
05-04-2022 CITY COUNCIL REVISIONS
LANDSCAPE AREA: 148,193 S.F.

PROJECT TYPE: PRIVATE
WATER SOURCE: POTABLE
PERCENTAGE OF EVERGREEN TREES: 74%
BIO-RETENTION BASINS LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SYMBOLS SPACINGSIZE QTY.

BACCHARIS PILULARIS
6' W X 1' H
6' W X 2' H
5' O.C.
2' W X 2' HCAREX DIVULSA 24" O.C.

ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA
'HOWARD MCMINN'
6' W X 6' H5 GAL. 6' O.C. 42
247
107
974

ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET'

ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS
'HUNTINGTON CARPET'
GROUNDCOVER LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SYMBOLS SPACINGSIZE QTY.
1 GAL. 5' O.C. 6' W X 1' H
6' O.C. 6' W X 2' H1 GAL.
3946
233
SHRUB LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SPACINGSIZE QTY.

MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'COMPACTA' 5 GAL. 36" O.C. 3' W X 3' H
DIETES IRIDIOIDES 5 GAL. 30" O.C. 2' W X 2' H
RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA 5 GAL. PER PLAN 6' W X 10' H

SYMBOLS
PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'BRIGHT N TIGHT' 5 GAL. 6' W X 10' H 3482
1201
168
8 BOTANIC NAME

FORTNIGHT LILY

DWARF MYRTLE

CAROLINA LAUREL
CHERRY

CALIFORNIA

COFFEEBERRY

WUCOLSCOMMON NAME
WUCOLS

HUNTINGTON CARPET

ROSEMARY

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

WUCOLSBOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

DESERT CARPET
ACACIA

MCMINN MANZANITA

COYOTE BUSH

EUROPEAN GREY
SEDGE
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

MODERATE

SUMMARY DATA

MATURE SIZE

MATURE SIZE

MATURE SIZE
6' O.C.
6' O.C.

LOW
1 GAL.
1 GAL.
1 GAL.

LOW
LOW

ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET'

DESERT CARPET
ACACIA
TREE LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
REMARKSSPACINGSIZESYMBOLS QTY.

LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'NATCHEZ' 48" BOX PER PLAN DECIDUOUS,

MULTI-TRUNK
LAURUS NOBILIS 24" BOX EVERGREEN,
LOW

BRANCHING
CEDRUS DEODARA 36" BOX
5 OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' 48" BOX EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
WUCOLS
LOW

VERY LOW

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE

SWEET BAY

SOUTHERN LIVE OAK

DEODAR CEDAR

SWAN HILL OLIVE
48" BOX
LOW
41 18
14 4
LOW
ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' 24" BOXTRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM 10

QUERCUS VIRGINIANA

EVERGREEN,

STANDARD

EVERGREEN,

STANDARD

DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
LOW

MODERATE

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN
ARBUTUS 'MARINA' 24" BOXMARINA STRAWBERRY TREE 22 EVERGREEN, LOW

BRANCHING

LOWPER PLAN

MATURE SIZE
20' W X 25' H
25' W X 40' H
35' W X 50' H
20' W X 12' H
60' W X 70' H
40' W X 50' H
35' W X 40' H
PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 24" BOXLONDON PLANE 23 DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
MODERATEPER PLAN 50' W X 80' H

CALOCEDRUS DECURRENS PER PLAN EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
14 MODERATECALIFORNIA INCENSE CEDAR 15' W X 50' H36" BOX PISTACIA CHINENSIS 24" BOXCHINESE PISTACHE 15 DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
LOWPER PLAN 30' W X 35' H
15 GAL. 6' W X 10' H183 MODERATEPER PLAN
HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA 24" BOXTOYON 30 EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
VERY LOWPER PLAN 15' W X 20' H

RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA

COFFEEBERRY
948" BOX

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

CONCRETE PAVING

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

SCREENING FENCE

ENLARGEMENT A
SHEET L-4
NOTES:

1. OVER 30% OF PROPOSED TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE EVERGREEN

2. ROOT BARRIERS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF PAVING OR HARDSCAPE.

3. MINIMUM 3" DEPTH BARK MULCH IN ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTERS.

4. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT IN ALL NON-SEEDED LANDSCAPE AREAS.

5. INSTALL A WEED CONTROL LAYER IN ALL BARK AND/OR ROCK AREAS (AS APPLICABLE).

SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
20'
20'
SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
GATE
20' 20'

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING
SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
20'
20'20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
20'

TREE BOX SIZE DIAGRAM LEGEND
COLOR QTY.
141
SIZE
48" BOX
24" BOX
36" BOX 28
36 TOTAL

PERCENTAGE
69%
14%
17%
TOTAL: 205
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
L-2
N O R T H S C A L E: 1" = 50' - 0"
0 25 50 100

N O R T H

CONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLAN
FC
BA
21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

DATE REMARKS
architecture
planning
interiors
graphics
civil engineering
4683 Chabot Dr #300
Pleasanton, CA 94588
P 925.244.9620
F 925.244.9621
JOB NO.:

DRAWN BY.:

PA/PM:

SHEET
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 12-14-2021 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

RANCHO CORDOVA
Use of the plans and specifications contained
herein shall be restricted to the original site for
which they were prepared; publication thereof is
expressly limited to such use. Reproduction,
publication, or reuse by any method, in whole or
in part, without the express written consent of ima
is prohibited. Title to said plans remains the sole
property of ima; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.

SIGNATURE
DATE
01-21-2022 2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
05-04-2022 CITY COUNCIL REVISIONS
LANDSCAPE AREA: 148,193 S.F.

PROJECT TYPE: PRIVATE
WATER SOURCE: POTABLE
PERCENTAGE OF EVERGREEN TREES: 74%
BIO-RETENTION BASINS LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SYMBOLS SPACINGSIZE QTY.

BACCHARIS PILULARIS
6' W X 1' H
6' W X 2' H
5' O.C.
2' W X 2' HCAREX DIVULSA 24" O.C.

ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA
'HOWARD MCMINN'
6' W X 6' H5 GAL. 6' O.C. 42
247
107
974

ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET'

ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS
'HUNTINGTON CARPET'
GROUNDCOVER LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SYMBOLS SPACINGSIZE QTY.
1 GAL. 5' O.C. 6' W X 1' H
6' O.C. 6' W X 2' H1 GAL.
3946
233
SHRUB LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SPACINGSIZE QTY.

MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'COMPACTA' 5 GAL. 36" O.C. 3' W X 3' H
DIETES IRIDIOIDES 5 GAL. 30" O.C. 2' W X 2' H
RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA 5 GAL. PER PLAN 6' W X 10' H

SYMBOLS
PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'BRIGHT N TIGHT' 5 GAL. 6' W X 10' H 3482
1201
168
8 BOTANIC NAME

FORTNIGHT LILY

DWARF MYRTLE

CAROLINA LAUREL
CHERRY

CALIFORNIA

COFFEEBERRY

WUCOLSCOMMON NAME
WUCOLS

HUNTINGTON CARPET

ROSEMARY

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

WUCOLSBOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

DESERT CARPET
ACACIA

MCMINN MANZANITA

COYOTE BUSH

EUROPEAN GREY
SEDGE
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

MODERATE

SUMMARY DATA

MATURE SIZE

MATURE SIZE

MATURE SIZE
6' O.C.
6' O.C.

LOW
1 GAL.
1 GAL.
1 GAL.

LOW
LOW

ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET'

DESERT CARPET
ACACIA
TREE LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
REMARKSSPACINGSIZESYMBOLS QTY.

LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'NATCHEZ' 48" BOX PER PLAN DECIDUOUS,

MULTI-TRUNK
LAURUS NOBILIS 24" BOX EVERGREEN,
LOW

BRANCHING
CEDRUS DEODARA 36" BOX
5 OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' 48" BOX EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
WUCOLS
LOW

VERY LOW

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE

SWEET BAY

SOUTHERN LIVE OAK

DEODAR CEDAR

SWAN HILL OLIVE
48" BOX
LOW
41 18
14 4
LOW
ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' 24" BOXTRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM 10

QUERCUS VIRGINIANA

EVERGREEN,

STANDARD

EVERGREEN,

STANDARD

DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
LOW

MODERATE

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN
ARBUTUS 'MARINA' 24" BOXMARINA STRAWBERRY TREE 22 EVERGREEN, LOW

BRANCHING

LOWPER PLAN

MATURE SIZE
20' W X 25' H
25' W X 40' H
35' W X 50' H
20' W X 12' H
60' W X 70' H
40' W X 50' H
35' W X 40' H
PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 24" BOXLONDON PLANE 23 DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
MODERATEPER PLAN 50' W X 80' H

CALOCEDRUS DECURRENS PER PLAN EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
14 MODERATECALIFORNIA INCENSE CEDAR 15' W X 50' H36" BOX PISTACIA CHINENSIS 24" BOXCHINESE PISTACHE 15 DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
LOWPER PLAN 30' W X 35' H
15 GAL. 6' W X 10' H183 MODERATEPER PLAN
HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA 24" BOXTOYON 30 EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
VERY LOWPER PLAN 15' W X 20' H

RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA

COFFEEBERRY
948" BOX

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

CONCRETE PAVING

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

SCREENING FENCE

ENLARGEMENT A
SHEET L-4
NOTES:

1. OVER 30% OF PROPOSED TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE EVERGREEN

2. ROOT BARRIERS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF PAVING OR HARDSCAPE.

3. MINIMUM 3" DEPTH BARK MULCH IN ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTERS.

4. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT IN ALL NON-SEEDED LANDSCAPE AREAS.

5. INSTALL A WEED CONTROL LAYER IN ALL BARK AND/OR ROCK AREAS (AS APPLICABLE).

SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
20'
20'
SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
GATE
20' 20'

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING
SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
20'
20'20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
20'

TREE BOX SIZE DIAGRAM LEGEND
COLOR QTY.
141
SIZE
48" BOX
24" BOX
36" BOX 28
36 TOTAL

PERCENTAGE
69%
14%
17%
TOTAL: 205
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
L-2
N O R T H S C A L E: 1" = 50' - 0"
0 25 50 100

N O R T H

CONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLAN
FC
BA
21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

DATE REMARKS
architecture
planning
interiors
graphics
civil engineering
4683 Chabot Dr #300
Pleasanton, CA 94588
P 925.244.9620
F 925.244.9621
JOB NO.:

DRAWN BY.:

PA/PM:

SHEET
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 12-14-2021 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

RANCHO CORDOVA
Use of the plans and specifications contained
herein shall be restricted to the original site for
which they were prepared; publication thereof is
expressly limited to such use. Reproduction,
publication, or reuse by any method, in whole or
in part, without the express written consent of ima
is prohibited. Title to said plans remains the sole
property of ima; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.

SIGNATURE
DATE
01-21-2022 2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
05-04-2022 CITY COUNCIL REVISIONS
LANDSCAPE AREA: 148,193 S.F.

PROJECT TYPE: PRIVATE
WATER SOURCE: POTABLE
PERCENTAGE OF EVERGREEN TREES: 74%
BIO-RETENTION BASINS LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SYMBOLS SPACINGSIZE QTY.

BACCHARIS PILULARIS
6' W X 1' H
6' W X 2' H
5' O.C.
2' W X 2' HCAREX DIVULSA 24" O.C.

ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA
'HOWARD MCMINN'
6' W X 6' H5 GAL. 6' O.C. 42
247
107
974

ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET'

ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS
'HUNTINGTON CARPET'
GROUNDCOVER LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SYMBOLS SPACINGSIZE QTY.
1 GAL. 5' O.C. 6' W X 1' H
6' O.C. 6' W X 2' H1 GAL.
3946
233
SHRUB LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SPACINGSIZE QTY.

MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'COMPACTA' 5 GAL. 36" O.C. 3' W X 3' H
DIETES IRIDIOIDES 5 GAL. 30" O.C. 2' W X 2' H
RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA 5 GAL. PER PLAN 6' W X 10' H

SYMBOLS
PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'BRIGHT N TIGHT' 5 GAL. 6' W X 10' H 3482
1201
168
8 BOTANIC NAME

FORTNIGHT LILY

DWARF MYRTLE

CAROLINA LAUREL
CHERRY

CALIFORNIA

COFFEEBERRY

WUCOLSCOMMON NAME
WUCOLS

HUNTINGTON CARPET

ROSEMARY

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

WUCOLSBOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

DESERT CARPET
ACACIA

MCMINN MANZANITA

COYOTE BUSH

EUROPEAN GREY
SEDGE
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

MODERATE

SUMMARY DATA

MATURE SIZE

MATURE SIZE

MATURE SIZE
6' O.C.
6' O.C.

LOW
1 GAL.
1 GAL.
1 GAL.

LOW
LOW

ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET'

DESERT CARPET
ACACIA
TREE LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
REMARKSSPACINGSIZESYMBOLS QTY.

LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'NATCHEZ' 48" BOX PER PLAN DECIDUOUS,

MULTI-TRUNK
LAURUS NOBILIS 24" BOX EVERGREEN,
LOW

BRANCHING
CEDRUS DEODARA 36" BOX
5 OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' 48" BOX EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
WUCOLS
LOW

VERY LOW

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE

SWEET BAY

SOUTHERN LIVE OAK

DEODAR CEDAR

SWAN HILL OLIVE
48" BOX
LOW
41 18
14 4
LOW
ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' 24" BOXTRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM 10

QUERCUS VIRGINIANA

EVERGREEN,

STANDARD

EVERGREEN,

STANDARD

DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
LOW

MODERATE

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN
ARBUTUS 'MARINA' 24" BOXMARINA STRAWBERRY TREE 22 EVERGREEN, LOW

BRANCHING

LOWPER PLAN

MATURE SIZE
20' W X 25' H
25' W X 40' H
35' W X 50' H
20' W X 12' H
60' W X 70' H
40' W X 50' H
35' W X 40' H
PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 24" BOXLONDON PLANE 23 DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
MODERATEPER PLAN 50' W X 80' H

CALOCEDRUS DECURRENS PER PLAN EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
14 MODERATECALIFORNIA INCENSE CEDAR 15' W X 50' H36" BOX PISTACIA CHINENSIS 24" BOXCHINESE PISTACHE 15 DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
LOWPER PLAN 30' W X 35' H
15 GAL. 6' W X 10' H183 MODERATEPER PLAN
HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA 24" BOXTOYON 30 EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
VERY LOWPER PLAN 15' W X 20' H

RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA

COFFEEBERRY
948" BOX

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

CONCRETE PAVING

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

SCREENING FENCE

ENLARGEMENT A
SHEET L-4
NOTES:

1. OVER 30% OF PROPOSED TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE EVERGREEN

2. ROOT BARRIERS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF PAVING OR HARDSCAPE.

3. MINIMUM 3" DEPTH BARK MULCH IN ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTERS.

4. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT IN ALL NON-SEEDED LANDSCAPE AREAS.

5. INSTALL A WEED CONTROL LAYER IN ALL BARK AND/OR ROCK AREAS (AS APPLICABLE).

SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
20'
20'
SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
GATE
20' 20'

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING
SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
20'
20'20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
20'

TREE BOX SIZE DIAGRAM LEGEND
COLOR QTY.
141
SIZE
48" BOX
24" BOX
36" BOX 28
36 TOTAL

PERCENTAGE
69%
14%
17%
TOTAL: 205
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
48"
L-2
N O R T H S C A L E: 1" = 50' - 0"
0 25 50 100

N O R T H

CONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLAN
FC
BA
21155

LOGISTICENTER AT

BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670

DATE REMARKS
architecture
planning
interiors
graphics
civil engineering
4683 Chabot Dr #300
Pleasanton, CA 94588
P 925.244.9620
F 925.244.9621
JOB NO.:

DRAWN BY.:

PA/PM:

SHEET
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 12-14-2021 PLANNING SUBMITTAL

RANCHO CORDOVA
Use of the plans and specifications contained
herein shall be restricted to the original site for
which they were prepared; publication thereof is
expressly limited to such use. Reproduction,
publication, or reuse by any method, in whole or
in part, without the express written consent of ima
is prohibited. Title to said plans remains the sole
property of ima; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.

SIGNATURE
DATE
01-21-2022 2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
05-04-2022 CITY COUNCIL REVISIONS
LANDSCAPE AREA: 148,193 S.F.

PROJECT TYPE: PRIVATE
WATER SOURCE: POTABLE
PERCENTAGE OF EVERGREEN TREES: 74%
BIO-RETENTION BASINS LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SYMBOLS SPACINGSIZE QTY.

BACCHARIS PILULARIS
6' W X 1' H
6' W X 2' H
5' O.C.
2' W X 2' HCAREX DIVULSA 24" O.C.

ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA
'HOWARD MCMINN'
6' W X 6' H5 GAL. 6' O.C. 42
247
107
974

ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET'

ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS
'HUNTINGTON CARPET'
GROUNDCOVER LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SYMBOLS SPACINGSIZE QTY.
1 GAL. 5' O.C. 6' W X 1' H
6' O.C. 6' W X 2' H1 GAL.
3946
233
SHRUB LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
SPACINGSIZE QTY.

MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'COMPACTA' 5 GAL. 36" O.C. 3' W X 3' H
DIETES IRIDIOIDES 5 GAL. 30" O.C. 2' W X 2' H
RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA 5 GAL. PER PLAN 6' W X 10' H

SYMBOLS
PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'BRIGHT N TIGHT' 5 GAL. 6' W X 10' H 3482
1201
168
8 BOTANIC NAME

FORTNIGHT LILY

DWARF MYRTLE

CAROLINA LAUREL
CHERRY

CALIFORNIA

COFFEEBERRY

WUCOLSCOMMON NAME
WUCOLS

HUNTINGTON CARPET

ROSEMARY

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

WUCOLSBOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

DESERT CARPET
ACACIA

MCMINN MANZANITA

COYOTE BUSH

EUROPEAN GREY
SEDGE
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

MODERATE

SUMMARY DATA

MATURE SIZE

MATURE SIZE

MATURE SIZE
6' O.C.
6' O.C.

LOW
1 GAL.
1 GAL.
1 GAL.

LOW
LOW

ACACIA REDOLENS 'DESERT CARPET'

DESERT CARPET
ACACIA
TREE LEGEND - SUNSET ZONE 14
REMARKSSPACINGSIZESYMBOLS QTY.

LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'NATCHEZ' 48" BOX PER PLAN DECIDUOUS,

MULTI-TRUNK
LAURUS NOBILIS 24" BOX EVERGREEN,
LOW

BRANCHING
CEDRUS DEODARA 36" BOX
5 OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' 48" BOX EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
WUCOLS
LOW

VERY LOW

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME

NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE

SWEET BAY

SOUTHERN LIVE OAK

DEODAR CEDAR

SWAN HILL OLIVE
48" BOX
LOW
41 18
14 4
LOW
ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' 24" BOXTRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM 10

QUERCUS VIRGINIANA

EVERGREEN,

STANDARD

EVERGREEN,

STANDARD

DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
LOW

MODERATE

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN

PER PLAN
ARBUTUS 'MARINA' 24" BOXMARINA STRAWBERRY TREE 22 EVERGREEN, LOW

BRANCHING

LOWPER PLAN

MATURE SIZE
20' W X 25' H
25' W X 40' H
35' W X 50' H
20' W X 12' H
60' W X 70' H
40' W X 50' H
35' W X 40' H
PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 24" BOXLONDON PLANE 23 DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
MODERATEPER PLAN 50' W X 80' H

CALOCEDRUS DECURRENS PER PLAN EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
14 MODERATECALIFORNIA INCENSE CEDAR 15' W X 50' H36" BOX PISTACIA CHINENSIS 24" BOXCHINESE PISTACHE 15 DECIDUOUS,

STANDARD
LOWPER PLAN 30' W X 35' H
15 GAL. 6' W X 10' H183 MODERATEPER PLAN
HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA 24" BOXTOYON 30 EVERGREEN,

STANDARD
VERY LOWPER PLAN 15' W X 20' H

RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA

COFFEEBERRY
948" BOX

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTING, TYP.

CONCRETE PAVING

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

SCREENING FENCE

ENLARGEMENT A
SHEET L-4
NOTES:

1. OVER 30% OF PROPOSED TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE EVERGREEN

2. ROOT BARRIERS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF PAVING OR HARDSCAPE.

3. MINIMUM 3" DEPTH BARK MULCH IN ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTERS.

4. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT IN ALL NON-SEEDED LANDSCAPE AREAS.

5. INSTALL A WEED CONTROL LAYER IN ALL BARK AND/OR ROCK AREAS (AS APPLICABLE).

SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
20'
20'
SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
GATE
20' 20'

BIO-RETENTION

BASIN PLANTING
SIGHT TRIANGLE, TYP.

PLANTED DWARF ROSEMARY
20'
20'20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
20'

TREE BOX SIZE DIAGRAM LEGEND
COLOR QTY.
141
SIZE
48" BOX
24" BOX
36" BOX 28
36 TOTAL

PERCENTAGE
69%
14%
17%
TOTAL: 205
PAGE
11 10.03.2022LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00
ENHANCED LANDSCAPE SCREENING @N.MATHER & BEAR HOLLOW
SCALE: NTS
This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

PAGE
12 10.03.2022LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00

SITE PHOTOMETRICS
SCALE: NTS
This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Updated Site Plan
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Current Landscaping Plan
Previous Landscaping Plan
Final Submittal
Box Size Number of trees Diameter of all
trees combined % Increase
24 141 3384 -10%
36 28 1008
48 36 1728 20%
205 6120 18%
First Submittal
Box Size Number of trees Diameter of all
trees combined
24 157 3768
36 0 0
48 30 1440
187 5208
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

PAGE
9 05.04.2022

LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00

FUTURE LANDSCAPING
This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

APPROACH FROM BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE - LANDSCAPING @ 10 YEARS

2.0 TRUCK TURNING DIAGRAMS - BEAR HOLLOW TRUCK COURT ENTRANCE 08 . 05 . 2022
11 TRUCK TURN MOVEMENT - NORTHBOUND INGRESS

NO LEFT TURN SIGN

TRUCK TURN MOVEMENT - SOUTHBOUND INGRESS

TURN MOVEMENT DOES

NOT WORK FOR TRUCK

ENTERING SITE COMING

SOUTHBOUND

NO LEFT TURN SIGN
10 . 03 . 2022
13 ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

PAGE
9 05.04.2022

LOGISTIC CENTER AT RANCHO CORDOVA
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA- SNR21-0064-00

FUTURE LANDSCAPING
This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification.

APPROACH FROM BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE - LANDSCAPING @ 10 YEARS

2.0 TRUCK TURNING DIAGRAMS - BEAR HOLLOW TRUCK COURT ENTRANCE 08 . 05 . 2022
12 TRUCK TURN MOVEMENT - NORTHBOUND EGRESS

TRUCK TURN MOVEMENT - SOUTHBOUND EGRESS

NO LEFT TURN SIGN

TURN MOVEMENT DOES

NOT WORK FOR TRUCK

LEAVING THE SITE

GOING NORTHBOUND

NO LEFT TURN SIGN
10 . 03 . 2022
14 ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center
Rancho Cordova, California
BAC Job # 2021-192
Prepared For:

DPML Bear Hollow, LLC.

Prepared By:

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc.

Dario Gotchet, Principal Consultant

January 26, 2022

Attn: Shelagh Danna
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, NV 89502
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. ● P.O. Box 7968, Auburn, CA. 95604 ● Phone: (530) 537-2328 ● bacnoise.com ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Introduction
The Logistic Center is located north of Mather Boulevard and west of Bear Hollow Drive in the City of Rancho Cordova, California. The project consists of the development of an industrial building (approximately 155,000 ft 2) containing warehouse and office uses, and associated parking. The location of the project site with aerial imagery is shown in Figure 1. The project conceptual site plan is presented as Figure 2.

Due to the potential for elevated project-generated on-site operations noise levels at nearby residential uses, Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC) was retained to prepare this noise assessment. Specifically, the purposes of this assessment are to quantify noise levels associated with project on-site industrial operations, to assess the state of compliance of those noise levels with applicable City of Rancho Cordova noise standards, and if necessary, to recommend measures to reduce those noise levels to acceptable limits.

Noise Fundamentals and Terminology
Noise is often described as unwanted sound. Sound is defined as any pressure variation in air that the human ear can detect. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), they can be heard, and thus are called sound. Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a very large and awkward range of numbers. To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale allows a million-fold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB. Another useful aspect of the decibel scale is that changes in levels (dB) correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness. Appendix A contains definitions of Acoustical Terminology. Figure 3 shows common noise levels associated with various sources.

The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable, and can be approximated by weighing the frequency response of a sound level meter by means of the standardized A-weighing network.

There is a strong correlation between A-weighted sound levels (expressed as dBA) and community response to noise. For this reason, the A-weighted sound level has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment. All noise levels reported in this section are in terms of A-weighted levels in decibels.

Community noise is commonly described in terms of the “ambient” noise level, which is defined as the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given noise environment. A common statistical tool to measure the ambient noise level is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq) over a given time period (usually one hour). The L eq is the foundation of the Day-Night Average Level noise descriptor, Ldn or DNL, and shows very good correlation with community response to noise.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Legend
Figure 10 500
Scale (Feet)
250
Logistic Center
Rancho Cordova, California
Project Area
Project Boundary (Approximate)
Long-term Noise Measurement Location
1 2
3 Existing Residential Uses#
Existing Solid Noise Barriers
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Legend
Figure 20 200
Scale (Feet)
100
Logistic Center
Rancho Cordova, California
Conceptual Site Plan
On-Site Truck Circulation Route
Truck Trailer Parking Areas
Truck Loading Docks
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Figure 3
Noise Levels Associated with Common Noise Sources

DNL is based upon the average noise level over a 24-hour day, with a +10-decibel weighting applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. The nighttime penalty is based upon the assumption that people react to nighttime noise exposures as though they were twice as loud as daytime exposures. Because DNL represents a 24-hour average, it tends to disguise short-term variations in the noise environment. DNL-based noise standards are commonly used to assess noise impacts associated with traffic, railroad, and aircraft noise sources.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Criteria for Acceptable Noise Exposure
Rancho Cordova General Plan
Policies N.1.1 through N.1.4 of the Rancho Cordova Noise Element specifically pertain to noise generated by non-transportation noise sources, such as those associated with project on-site operations. Those policies, and the corresponding actions which are applied to those policies, are provided below:

Policy N.1.1 Establish standards and policies consistent with those in Tables N-1 and N-2 to govern maximum sound levels in new development.

Action N.1.2.1 – Adopt a Noise Ordinance with noise level performance standards, including maximum allowable noise exposure, ambient versus nuisance noise, method of measuring noise, and enforcement procedures.

Policy N.1.2 Ensure that the indoor and outdoor areas of new projects will be located, constructed, and shielded from noise sources in compliance with the City’s noise standards to the maximum extent feasible.

Action N.1.2.1 – Require new development of noise-creating uses to conform with the City’s maximum noise levels.

Action N.1.2.2 – Require an acoustical analysis as part of the environmental review process when noise-sensitive land uses are proposed in areas where current or projected exterior noise levels exceed the City’s standards.

Action N.1.2.3 – Require any potential noise impacts identified during the acoustical analysis to be mitigated in the project design to the maximum extent feasible.

Policy N.1.3 Ensure that proposed non-residential land uses likely to exceed the City’s standards do not create noise disturbances in existing noise-sensitive areas.

Action N.1.3.1 - Require an acoustical analysis as part of the environmental review process when proposed non-residential land uses are likely to produce noise levels that exceed the City’s noise standards. The acoustical analysis must be prepared by a qualified person experienced in environmental noise assessment and architectural acoustics and must estimate existing and projected cumulative noise levels and compare those levels to the policies within this Element.

Action N.1.3.2 - Require any noise impacts identified in the acoustical analysis to be mitigated in conjunction with the project design.

Policy N.1.4 Mitigate noise created by proposed non-transportation noise sources to comply with the City’s noise standards to the maximum extent feasible.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Action N.1.4.2 – Consider restricting the hours of operation of loading docks, trash compactors, and other noise-producing uses in commercial areas that are adjacent to residential uses.

The City’s non-transportation noise level performance standards referenced in these policies are provided in Table N-1 of the Noise Element. That table is reproduced in this report below as Table 1.

Table 1
Noise Level Performance Standards For New Projects Affected by or Including Non-Transportation Noise Sources1
Stationary Noise Source
Noise Level
Descriptor
Daytime
7 a.m. to 10 p.m.

Nighttime
10 p.m. to 7 a.m.

Typical Hourly Leq, dB 55 45
Tonal, Impulsive, Repetitive, or
Consist Primarily of Speech or Music Hourly Leq, dB 50 40 1 The City may impose noise level standards which are more or less restrictive than those specified above based upon determination of existing low or high ambient noise levels.

Source: Rancho Cordova General Plan Noise Element, Table N-1.

Existing Ambient Noise Environment within the Project Vicinity The existing ambient noise environment within the project vicinity is defined primarily by traffic on N. Mather Boulevard, Bear Hollow Drive and Airpark Drive, and by aircraft operations associated with Mather Airport to the south. To generally quantify the existing ambient noise environment within the project vicinity, BAC conducted a long-term (48-hour) noise level survey from December 8-9, 2021. Photographs of the noise survey location are provided as Appendix B.

A Larson-Davis Laboratories (LDL) Model 820 precision integrating sound level meter was used to complete the noise level measurement survey. The meter was calibrated immediately before use with an LDL Model CAL200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy off the measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4).

The long-term ambient noise level survey results are summarized in Table 2. The detailed results of the ambient noise survey are contained in Appendix C in tabular format and graphically in Appendix D.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Table 2
Summary of Long-Term Noise Survey Measurement Results 1 Site Description2 Date DNL
Average Measured
Hourly Noise Levels (dBA)
Daytime3 Nighttime4
Leq Lmax Leq Lmax
North of the project site at
residential uses and Airpark Drive
12/8/21 60 59 78 52 73
12/9/21 61 59 79 54 74
1 Detailed summaries of the noise monitoring results are provided in Appendices C and D. 2 Long-term noise survey location is identified on Figure 1. 3 Daytime hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
4 Nighttime hours: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (2021)
The BAC noise measurement site was selected to be representative of the ambient noise level environment at the nearest residential uses to the project area, located to the north along Airpark Drive. As indicated in Table 2, average measured noise levels (L eq) at the survey location exceeded Rancho Cordova General Plan daytime and nighttime noise level standards applicable to noise-sensitive uses.

Noise Impacts from Project-Generated On-Site Operations According to the provided site drawings (dated October 1, 2021), the project proposes the construction of an industrial building (approximately 155,000 ft2) containing warehouse and office uses with associated parking. The location of the proposed industrial building is shown in Figure

2. Noise generated by heavy trucks arriving and departing the site, backing into the loading docks, and coupling/decoupling, will be one of the primary noise sources associated with this project.

Once the heavy trucks are docked at the loading bays, they will be loaded and unloaded from within the building, so no outside loading/unloading activities would occur, and noise generated by such activities would be contained within the building. Another primary noise source associated with the project has been identified as mechanical equipment (HVAC). However, it is the experience of BAC in similar industrial projects that mechanical equipment would either be housed in an equipment room or located on the roof of the buildings and shielded by screen walls (parapets).

Noise generated by project-related activities were quantified through a combination of reference noise level measurements and application of accepted noise modeling techniques. Separate discussions of noise generated by on-site heavy truck circulation and trailer coupling/decoupling are provided in the following sections.

The Rancho Cordova General Plan daytime and nighttime performance standards of 55 and 45 dB Leq (respectively) were applied to project on-site operations noise generation and assessed at ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

the nearest existing residential uses. The nearest existing residential uses are represented by numeric values on Figure 1 – identified as Residential 1-3. For the purposes of this assessment, it was assumed that on-site operations would occur during both daytime and nighttime hours.

However, satisfaction of the General Plan’s nighttime noise level standard would ensure for compliance with the General Plan’s less restrictive daytime noise level limit. As a result, the following analyses focus on compliance with the General Plan’s nighttime noise level standard of 45 dB Leq at the nearest residential uses.

On-Site Heavy Truck Circulation
Based on a review of the site drawings, the heavy truck access point will be on the north end of the development off Bear Hollow Drive. The truck access point and on-site truck circulation route and are shown on Figure 2.

The project site plan indicates that the industrial building will have 27 truck loading docks. To assess project on-site truck circulation noise exposure relative to the General Plan’s hourly average (Leq) noise level descriptor, it is necessary to identify the number of truck movements occurring during a typical busy hour of operations. For the purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that the project could have up to 50 on-site heavy truck trips during a worst-case busy hour (believed to be conservative).

Heavy truck arrivals and departures, and on-site truck circulation, will occur at low speeds. To quantify the noise generation of slow moving trucks, BAC utilized single-event passby noise test results for slow-moving heavy trucks conducted at the West El Camino truck stop in Sacramento, California. The passby measurements were conducted at a reference distance of 50 feet at a location suitable for isolation of individual passby events. During the truck passbys, Larson-Davis Laboratories Model 820 and 2900 sound level meters and frequency analyzers were used to quantify noise levels and event frequency content for each event. The results of the heavy truck measurements indicated that maximum noise levels ranged from 69 to 77 dB L max, with a mean of 74 dB Lmax. Truck passby levels measured in terms of Sound Exposure Levels (SEL) ranged from 77 to 85 dB, with a mean 83 dB. Based on the conservative estimate of 50 trips per hour, and an SEL of 83 dB per passby, the hourly average noise level generated by on-site heavy truck circulation computes to 64 dB Leq at a reference distance of 50 feet from the passby route.

Assuming standard sound wave spreading loss (-4.5 dB per doubling of distance from a moving point source), and a calculated reference noise level of 64 dB Leq at a distance of 50 feet, worst- case on-site heavy truck circulation noise exposure was predicted at the nearest existing residential uses. The results of those predictions relative to the City’s nighttime noise level standard are provided in Table 3.

It should be noted that existing solid noise barriers ranging from 6 to 7 feet-in-height are constructed along the property boundaries of the nearest existing residential uses. The locations of the existing noise barriers are illustrated on Figure 1. To account for the attenuation that would be provided by the existing noise barriers, the predicted noise levels in Table 3 have been conservatively reduced by 5 dB.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Table 3
Predicted On-Site Truck Circulation Noise Exposure vs. City Nighttime Noise Standard Receiver1 Distance (ft)2
Predicted Noise Level,
Leq (dB)3
City Nighttime Noise
Standard, Leq (dB)
Residential 1 1,000 40
45 Residential 2 1,200 39
Residential 3 1,000 40
1 Locations of nearest residential uses are shown on Figure 1. 2 Distances scaled from on-site truck circulation route to nearest residential uses using the provided site plan and City of Rancho Cordova online viewer.
3 Predicted noise levels include an offset of -5 dB to account for shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers. The locations of the existing noise barriers are shown on Figure 1.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (2022)

As indicated in Table 3, worst-case on-site truck circulation noise levels are predicted to satisfy the Rancho Cordova General Plan nighttime noise level standard of 45 dB L eq at the nearest residential uses. The predicted compliance includes consideration of shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers at the locations illustrated on Figure 1. In addition, the predicted noise levels in Table 3 are below or within the range of measured ambient daytime and nighttime noise levels at the nearest residential uses to the project area (near Residential 1).

Based on the analysis and results provided above, no further consideration of noise mitigation measures would be warranted for this aspect of the project.

It should be noted that screening provided by existing and future intervening structures constructed on adjacent parcels to the north and east of the project would likely reduce project- generated on-site operations noise levels at the nearest existing residential uses (Residential 1- 3). However, without having finalized site plans indicating building location and orientation on those properties, the degree in which project operations noise levels would be attenuated is difficult to determine with a high level of accuracy. Nonetheless, excluding any consideration of shielding that may be provided existing or future structures on adjacent properties, the predicted noise levels in Table 3 would satisfy the applicable General Plan noise level criteria at the closest residential uses.

On-Site Heavy Truck Backing and Trailering Activities
Noise would be generated during brief periods by trucks backing into warehouse building loading docks and trailer parking areas during trailer coupling/decoupling activities (including backup beepers). It was assumed that heavy trucks would not be permitted to idle while on-site, and that refrigerator trucks (if applicable), would be plugged into loading bay power. The locations of the truck loading docks and trailer parking areas are shown on Figure 2.

To quantify the noise generated by truck backup warning devices and trailer coupling/decoupling activities, BAC conducted noise level measurements of a similar sized warehouse distribution facility in Patterson, California over a 48-hour period in August of 2015. The noise level results from the Patterson facility indicate that the measured average noise levels for the entire monitoring period were 54 dB Leq and 71 dB Lmax at a distance of 100 feet from the effective noise ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

center of the truck backing, coupling and decoupling area. Based on the reference noise level data provided above, and assuming standard sound wave spreading loss (-4.5 dB per doubling of distance from a moving point source), truck backing and trailering noise associated with the loading docks and trailer parking areas was predicted at the nearest existing residential uses.

The results of those predictions relative to the City’s nighttime noise level standard are provided below in Table 4.

As mentioned previously, existing solid noise barriers ranging from 6 to 7-feet-in-height are constructed along the property boundaries of the nearest existing residential uses (illustrated on Figure 1). To account for the attenuation that would be provided by the existing noise barriers, the predicted noise levels in Table 4 have been conservatively reduced by 5 dB.

Table 4
Predicted Truck Backing and Trailering Noise Exposure vs. City Nighttime Noise Standard Receiver1
Distance (ft)2
Predicted Noise Level,
Leq (dB)3
City Nighttime
Noise Standard,
Leq (dB)
Loading
Docks
Trailer
Parking
Loading
Docks
Trailer
Parking
Residential 1 1,100 1,000 33 34
45 Residential 2 1,300 1,300 32 32
Residential 3 1,100 1,100 33 33
1 Locations of nearest residential uses are shown on Figure 1. 2 Distances scaled from closest loading dock and trailer parking areas to residential uses using provided site plan and City of Rancho Cordova online viewer.
3 Predicted noise levels include an offset of -5 dB to account for shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers. The locations of the existing noise barriers are shown on Figure 1.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (2022)

The Table 4 data indicate that truck backing and trailering noise levels are predicted to satisfy the Rancho Cordova General Plan nighttime noise level standard of 45 dB L eq at the nearest residential uses. The predicted compliance includes consideration of shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers at the locations illustrated on Figure 1. Further, the predicted noise levels in Table 4 are below the range of measured ambient daytime and nighttime noise levels at the nearest residential uses to the project area (near Residential 1). Based on the analysis and results provided above, no further consideration of noise mitigation measures would be warranted for this aspect of the project.

As discussed previously, the screening provided by existing and future intervening structures constructed on adjacent parcels to the north and east of the project would likely reduce project- generated on-site operations noise levels at the nearest existing residential uses (Residential 1- 3). Nonetheless, excluding any consideration of shielding that may be provided by those structures, the predicted noise levels in Table 4 would satisfy the applicable General Plan noise level criteria at the closest residential uses.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise Assessment
Logistic Center – Rancho Cordova, California

Conclusions
Based on the analysis and results presented in this report, noise levels associated with project- generated on-site operations at the proposed Logistic Center are predicted to satisfy the applicable Rancho Cordova General Plan noise criteria at the nearest existing residential uses.

The predicted compliance includes consideration of shielding that would be provided by existing solid noise barriers at the locations illustrated on Figure 1. In addition, predicted on-site operations noise levels are expected to be below or within the range of measured ambient daytime and nighttime noise levels at the nearest residential uses to the project area. As a result, no further consideration of noise mitigation measures would be warranted for the project.

It should be noted that screening provided by existing and future intervening structures constructed on adjacent parcels to the north and east of the project would likely reduce project- generated on-site operations noise levels at the nearest existing residential uses. However, without having finalized site plans indicating building location and orientation on those properties, the degree in which project operations noise levels would be attenuated is difficult to determine with a high level of accuracy. Nonetheless, excluding any consideration of shielding that may be provided existing or future structures on adjacent properties, the predicted on-site operations noise levels presented in this report would satisfy the applicable Rancho Cordova General Plan noise level criteria at the closest residential uses.

These conclusions are based on the operations assumptions cited herein, BAC file data, and the studied site design presented in Figure 2 (dated October 1, 2021). Deviations from the resources cited herein could cause noise levels to differ from those predicted in this assessment. It should be noted that, although noise levels associated with operations at the proposed industrial center are predicted to comply with applicable Rancho Cordova General Plan noise level limits at the nearest residential uses, it is ultimately up to the future individual businesses/tenants of the development to comply with said noise standards.

This concludes our environmental noise assessment for the Logistic Center in Rancho Cordova, California. Please contact BAC at (530) 537-2328 or [email protected] with comments or questions regarding this assessment.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Appendix A
Acoustical Terminology

Acoustics The science of sound.

Ambient Noise The distinctive acoustical char acteristics of a given space consisting of all noise sources audible at that location. In many cases, the term ambient is used to describe an existing or pre-project condition such as the setting in an environmental noise study.

Attenuation The reduction of an acoustic signal.

A-Weighting A frequency-response adjustment of a sound level meter that co nditions the output signal to approximate human response.

Decibel or dB Fundamental unit of sound. A Bell is defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the sound pressure squared over the reference pressure squared. A Decibe l is one-tenth of a Bell.

CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Lev el. Defined as the 24-hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 - 10 p.m.) weighted by a factor of three and nighttime hours weighted by a factor of 10 prior to averaging.

Frequency The measure of the rapidity of alterations of a periodic signa l, expressed in cycles per second or hertz.

IIC Impact Insulation Class (IIC): A single-number representation of a floor/ceiling partition’s impact generated noise insulation performance. The field-measured version of this number is the FIIC.

L
dn Day/Night Average Sound Level . Similar to CNEL but with no evening weighting.

Leq Equivalent or energy-averaged sound level.

Lmax The highest root-mean-square (R MS) sound level measured over a given period of time.

Loudness A subjective term for the sensation of the magnitude of sound.

Masking The amount (or the process) by which the threshold of audibility is for one sound is raised by the presence of another (masking) sound.

Noise Unwanted sound.

Peak Noise The level corresponding to the hi ghest (not RMS) sound pressure measured over a given period of time. This term is often confused with the “Maximum” level, which is the highest RMS level.

RT
60 The time it takes reverberant sound to decay by 60 dB once th e source has been removed.

STC Sound Transmission Class (STC): A single-number representation of a partition’s noise insulation performance. This number is based on laboratory-measured, 16-band (1/3- octave) transmission loss (TL) data of the subject partition. The field-measured version of this number is the FSTC.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Legend
Appendix B
Logistic Center
Rancho Cordova, California
Photographs of Noise Survey Location
Site 1: Facing east along residential boundaries and Airpark DriveA B
C
Site 1: Facing west along residential boundaries and Airpark Drive Site 1: Facing northeast looking at noise monitoring equipment A
B
C
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

.

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 45 72 34 30
1:00 AM 36 64 30 28 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 43 68 34 31 Leq (Average) 62 51 59 58 36 52
3:00 AM 46 71 34 31 Lmax (Maximum) 90 71 78 86 64 73
4:00 AM 52 81 37 34 L50 (Median) 55 39 48 46 30 37
5:00 AM 51 72 39 34 L90 (Background) 48 35 43 43 28 33 6:00 AM 58 86 46 43
7:00 AM 60 75 50 46 Computed DNL, dB 60
8:00 AM 61 77 53 48 % Daytime Energy 90%
9:00 AM 60 86 49 46 % Nighttime Energy 10%
10:00 AM 62 87 55 46
11:00 AM 58 78 49 46
12:00 PM 56 73 48 46
1:00 PM 56 76 50 46
2:00 PM 61 90 52 47
3:00 PM 60 78 51 44
4:00 PM 59 80 48 44
5:00 PM 58 79 47 43
6:00 PM 56 73 45 40
7:00 PM 55 74 44 39
8:00 PM 51 71 41 37
9:00 PM 53 72 39 35
10:00 PM 52 72 39 36
11:00 PM 48 72 38 35
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) GPS Coordinates 38°34'18.02" N
121°17'11.77" W
Appendix C-1
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results - Site 1
Logistic Center - Rancho Cordova, California
Wednesday, December 08, 2021
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

.

Hour Leq Lmax L50 L90
12:00 AM 48 69 36 33
1:00 AM 45 69 43 37 High Low Average High Low Average
2:00 AM 50 72 43 41 Leq (Average) 62 52 59 59 45 54
3:00 AM 54 80 41 38 Lmax (Maximum) 84 71 79 83 69 74
4:00 AM 55 83 42 38 L50 (Median) 53 45 49 54 36 44
5:00 AM 54 74 46 42 L90 (Background) 48 42 45 50 33 41 6:00 AM 59 76 54 50
7:00 AM 62 84 53 48 Computed DNL, dB 61
8:00 AM 62 82 52 48 % Daytime Energy 84%
9:00 AM 59 80 50 48 % Nighttime Energy 16%
10:00 AM 57 79 50 47
11:00 AM 59 84 49 47
12:00 PM 58 83 50 46
1:00 PM 57 83 49 46
2:00 PM 59 76 51 46
3:00 PM 57 74 48 44
4:00 PM 59 77 50 42
5:00 PM 61 84 52 46
6:00 PM 56 75 48 44
7:00 PM 56 75 48 43
8:00 PM 56 74 46 43
9:00 PM 52 71 45 42
10:00 PM 52 70 46 44
11:00 PM 51 71 45 44
Statistical Summary
Daytime (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) GPS Coordinates 38°34'18.02" N
121°17'11.77" W
Appendix C-2
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results - Site 1
Logistic Center - Rancho Cordova, California
Thursday, December 09, 2021
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

60 dB
Appendix D-1
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results - Site 1
Logistic Center - Rancho Cordova, California
Wednesday, December 08, 2021
Computed DNL =
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA
Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

61 dB
Appendix D-2
Long-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results - Site 1
Logistic Center - Rancho Cordova, California
Thursday, December 09, 2021
Computed DNL =
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
12:00 AM 4:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 PM 8:00 PM 11:00 PM Sound Pressure Level, dBA
Time of Day
Average (Leq) Maximum (Lmax) Median (L50) Background (L90) ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

STOP
STOP
STOP
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
Bear Hollow Drive
Auvernat Drive
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

PROJECT
AREA
Femoyer St
Zinfandel Dr
N Mather Blvd
Robola Way
Auvernat Dr
International Dr
Bear Hollow Dr
Airpark Dr
Queens Arbor Dr
Bear Hollow Dr
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

STOP
STOP
STOP
BIKE
LANE
Bear Hollow Drive
Robola Way
ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Transportation Engineers

3853 Taylor Road, Suite G • Loomis, CA 95650 • (916) 660-1555 • FAX (916) 660-1535

March 9, 2022

Mr. George Condon, Partner, West Region

DERMODY
5500 Equity Avenue
Reno, CA 89502

RE: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATE AND TRUCK / AUTOMOBILE CIRCULATION

ASSESSMENT FOR BEAR HOLLOW DRIVE BUSINESS/ PROFESSIONAL SITE,

RANCHO CORDOVA, CA

Dear Mr. Condon:

As requested, KD Anderson & Associates has completed this assessment of the probable trip generation associated with the uses on the Bear Hollow Drive Business/Professional (BP) site proposed in Rancho Cordova. The project involves construction of a 155,040 sf building in the BP (Business Park) zone at the intersection of Mather Blvd & Bear Hollow Drive. The building would be configured with 14 7,290 sf of warehouse space and 7,750 sf of supporting office space. The building would be accompanied by 27 truck loading docks, 32 trailer stalls and 98 automobile parking stalls.

Our work has involved review of the characteristics of the proposed project, consideration of potential trip generation rates presented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual , 11th Edition, selection of applicable trip generation rates and calculation of the project’s overall and truck trip generation forecasts. In turn, that information will be used by the City of Rancho Cordova to determine whether the potential traffic impacts associated with the project are inherently less than significant based on the number of trips generated or if subsequent analysis is needed to confirm a finding of no significant impact.

Our work also included identification of the most likely truck route to the site and quantification of the automobile trip distribution on the streets leading to the site.

Trip Generation Rates. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition offers trip generation rates that are appropriate for most land uses, and we review ed this reference as well as other available published materials. As noted in Table 1, trip generation rates are available for a variety of uses that might occupy a BP site. In general, the rates are dependent on employee density and the extent of travel to and from the site throughout the day. The buildings used for industrial / warehouse uses typically contain a small area of office space used to support the business operation, and that activity is included in the overall trip generation rates. Each land use category was also supported by truck trip generation rates.

The nature of the occupants of the buildings is unknown. Trip generation rates are available for General Light Industrial Uses ( Code 110), and these rates are presented in Table 1 below. Based on the project description, the site could also be developed with Warehouse uses, and the ITE rate for Warehousing (Code 150) has been identified. Finally, specialized warehousing has been a common type of development in the Rancho Cordova area, and ITE identifies High Cube Warehousing (Code 154) as follows:

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Mr. George Condon, Partner, West Region

DERMODY
March 9, 2022

A high-cube warehouse (HCW) is a building that typically has at least 200,000 gross square feet of floor area, has a ceiling height of 24 feet or more, and is used primarily for the storage and/or consolidation of manufactured goods (and to a lesser extent , raw materials) prior to their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. A typical HCW has a high level of on-site automation and logistics management. The automation and logistics enable highly - efficient processing of goods through the HCW. The HCWs included in this land use include transload and short -term facilities. Transload facilities have a primary function of consolidation and distribution of pallet loads (or larger) for manufacturers, wholesalers, or retailers. They typically have little storage duration, high throughput, and are high-efficiency facilities. Short -term HCWs are high -efficiency distribution facilities often with custom/special features built into structure for movement of large volumes of freight with only short-term storage of products.

Trip Generation Forecast. The number of peak hour trips associated with the project has been estimated for each land use category , and the results are also presented in Table 1. As shown, as a “worst case” , applying the Light Industrial rate could generate 755 trips over the course of the day (i.e., ½ inbound and ½ outbound) and would suggest 1 15 trips in the weekday a.m. peak hour and 101 trips in the p.m. peak hour. Alternatively, warehouse space as envisioned in the site plan, would generate 265 daily trips and 26 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 2 8 p.m. peak hour trips. The forecast associated with High Cube warehousing is even lower (i.e., 217 daily trips with 12 a.m. peak hour and 16 p.m. peak hour trips).

TABLE 1

TRIP GENERATION RATES FORECAST
ITE
Code Description
Average Trips per Unit
Unit Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
% in % out Total % in % out Total
110 General Light Industrial ksf 4.87 88% 12% 0.74 14% 86% 0.65 150 Warehousing ksf 1.71 77% 23% 0.17 28% 72% 0.18
154 High Cube warehouse ksf 1.40 77% 23% 0.08 28% 72% 0.10 Bear Hollow Drive Project
110 General Light Industrial
155.04
755 101 14 115 14 87 101
150 Warehousing 265 20 6 26 8 20 28
154 High Cube Warehouse 217 9 3 12 4 12 16

Trip Generation Conclusions. The City of Rancho Cordova’s traffic study guidelines typically determine the need for additional traffic impact analysis based on consideration of a project’s overall trip generation estimate. Those projects generating fewer than 1,000 daily or 100 peak hour trips do not typically require traffic impact analysis. If the Bear Hollow Drive BP site is developed with “General Light Industrial” uses (i.e., “worst case”) then the project’s trip generation estimates fall above those thresholds in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

ITEM 18.1.

ATTACHMENT 2