CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, December 18, 2023
5:30 PM – Regular Meeting
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
Join the Meeting Via Zoom Link:
https://cityofranchocordova.zoom.us/j/89954491239?pwd=W_mBYzinQu4qXMU3YOhcwxbCAhSi0Q.3naCQF9WSlPFSlQ9 Join the Meeting via the Zoom Phone Number
Zoom Phone Number: +1 669 900 6833, +1 253 215 8782
Webinar ID: 899 5449 1239
Password: 578969
Instructions to Make Public Comment
Submitting Public Comment via Email
Members of the public who wish to provide public comment via email will need to submit written comments to [email protected] no later than 2:00 p.m. on Monday, December 18, 2023. Written comments received no later than 2:00 p.m. will be distributed to the Council, filed in the record, and will not be read aloud. All comments submitted later than 2:00 p.m. will be distributed to the Council.
Listening to a Zoom Meeting by Zoom Video Conference
To make a public comment using the Zoom platform, please use the “raise hand” feature at the bottom center of the screen. Please make sure to enable audio controls once access has been given by the City Clerk’s office to speak. Please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.
Listening to a Zoom Meeting by Phone Only
You can join a Zoom meeting via teleconferencing/audio conferencing using a cell phone or traditional landline phone. To request to make a public comment by phone press *9 to raise your hand. Please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.
Rancho Cordova City Council - AMENDED AGENDA
Regular Meeting of Monday, December 18, 2023
All public comments will be limited to three minutes.
If you have questions related to the City Council Meeting or the use of Zoom, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 851-8720 before Monday, December 18, 2023, at 2:00 p.m.
AMENDED AGENDA
1. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Council Members Linda Budge, Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, Donald Terry, and Mayor David Sander
2. METRO CABLE TV TELEVISION ANNOUNCEMENT
The Clerk will announce the meetings video recording and playback schedules.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor will call on someone in attendance to lead the Pledge.
4. INVOCATION
Deacon Walt Little from St. John Vianney Catholic Church will give the invocation.
5. PRESENTATIONS
5.1. Introduction of New Professional Services Company to the City of Rancho Cordova.
5.2. Presentation of Proclamation to Code Enforcement Officer Michael Rodriguez in Honor of his Retirement.
5.3. New Employee Introductions: Kathryn Spuur, Customer Service Representative by Russell Ducharme, Neighborhood Services Manager, Kevin Velazquez, Assistant Civil Engineer by Drew Hart, Senior Transportation Planner, and Veronica Seward-Aponte, Assistant Civil Engineer by Dalia Fadl, Principal Engineer.
6. PUBLIC COMMENT
Citizens wishing to address the Council for any matter not on the agenda may do so at this time via teleconference or by completing and submitting a Speaker Card to the City Clerk.
If you want to make a public comment via teleconference, please use the “raise hand” feature at the bottom center of the screen. If you are participating by telephone and you want to make a public comment, please press *9 to raise your hand. For those participating by Zoom or telephone, please wait to be called upon by the City Clerk.
For items on the agenda, speakers will be called by the Mayor at the point on the agenda when the item will be heard. Speakers are encouraged to keep comments to three minutes or less and to state name and community of residence.
Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking immediate action on any item not on the agenda unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature or the need to take immediate action arose after the posting of the agenda.
Rancho Cordova City Council - AMENDED AGENDA
Regular Meeting of Monday, December 18, 2023
7. COUNCIL REPORTS
8. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
9. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE
9.1. Subject: Meeting Minutes from the Regular City Council Meetings of November 6, 2023, and December 4, 2023, and the Special Meetings of November 13, 2023, November 28, 2023, December 6, 2023, and December 12, 2023.
Recommendation: Adopt the minutes.
9.2. Subject: Treasurer's Report - September 30, 2023
Recommendation: This report is informational only. It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the September 30, 2023, Treasurer’s Report.
9.3. Subject: Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending Title 23, Chapter 23.325 Overlay Zoning Districts, Chapter 23.716 Landscaping, Chapter 23.719 Parking and Loading, Chapter
23.734 Accessory Structures, Chapter 23.743 Signs, and Chapter 23.1104 Definitions (CEQA Exemption Found in Guideline Section 15061(B)(3)).
Recommendation: Waive the second reading and adopt the Ordinance.
9.4. Subject: A Resolution Making Certain Findings and Determinations Related to, and Accepting, the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Development Impact Fee Report for Assembly Bill No. 1600 Development Fees.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
9.5. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Contract No. 2023-257 in an Amount not to Exceed $750,000 with the Sacramento Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) for Animal Shelter Services for a Term of January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2025.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
9.6. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Contract No. 2023-256 in an Amount not to Exceed $150,000 with Sacramento Regional Transit District for Design Support for the U.S. 50/Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Project.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
9.7. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the Continued Use of Military Equipment for Law Enforcement.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
9.8. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Contract Amendment No. 153-2019-2 with R3 Consulting Group Inc. for On-Call Solid Waste Consulting Services to Extend the Term from June 30, 2024, to June 30, 2026, and Increase the Contract Budget from $777,400 to an Amount not to Exceed $1,277,650.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
9.9. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with the Sacramento County Sheriff's Office for a Term Starting December 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2026, for the Supervision of the Sheriff's Work Project Program, Inmate Crew, for Flood Control and Landscaping Maintenance in an Amount not to Exceed $254,945.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
Rancho Cordova City Council - AMENDED AGENDA
Regular Meeting of Monday, December 18, 2023
9.10. Subject: A Resolution Declaring City-Owned Property at 2875 Kilgore Road, APN 072-0490- 024, as Surplus Land and Authorizing the City Manager to Proceed with the Surplus Land Act Process for Site Disposition.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
9.11. Subject: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova Approving the Fifth Amendment to the First Restated Agreement for Legal Services between the City and Meyers Nave.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
10. CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE
None.
11. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
None.
12. REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS
12.1. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of Special Tax Bonds for and on Behalf of the City of Rancho Cordova Grantline 220 Community Facilities District No. 2023-1, Improvement Area No. 1 Approving and Directing the Execution of a Fiscal Agent Agreement, Approving the Form of Preliminary Official Statement, Approving Sale of Such Bonds, and Approving Other Related Documents and Actions.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
12.2. Subject: Chase Drive American River Parkway Connection Project Update.
Recommendation: Receive the presentation and provide feedback.
12.3. Subject: Discussion and Potential Direction of Planning Commissioner Appointments and Qualifications.
Recommendation: Receive a report on Planning Commission qualifications and two applications received to fill a vacant at-large member seat. Upon conclusion of the discussion and public comment, provide staff with any feedback or direction on the information presented and any future code amendments to Chapter 2.30 Planning Commission to address Council's direction and how to proceed with the two at-large applications received.
12.4. Subject: Approval of Council Member Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees.
Recommendation: Confirm commitments to serve on other agency boards, commissions, and committees.
12.5. Subject: A Resolution Adopting the 2024 City Council Meeting Schedule.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
12.6. Subject: Appointment of Labor Negotiators.
Recommendation: Appoint Mayor David Sander and City Attorney Adam U. Lindgren as Labor Negotiators for negotiations with the current City Manager.
13. COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
14. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Rancho Cordova City Council - AMENDED AGENDA
Regular Meeting of Monday, December 18, 2023
Mayor Sander will adjourn the meeting to closed session.
15. CLOSED SESSION - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Council Members Linda Budge, Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, Donald Terry, and Mayor David Sander
16. CLOSED SESSION
Council will meet in closed session to discuss the following items:
16.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) 350 Sacramento, a California non-profit benefit corporation; and Oscar Balaguer v. City of Rancho Cordova, a general law city; City Council for the City of Rancho Cordova, and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive. Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 23WM000101.
16.2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)(One case, based on a letter dated October 24, 2023, to the Mayor and Council from Matthew Henderson of Miller Starr Regalia and testimony by Mr. Henderson at the October 24, 2023 City Council meeting opposing and threatening litigation on the proposed Ordinance amending sections of the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area) (One case).
16.3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) DPML Bear Hollow, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and DPML Stonecreek, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company v. City of Rancho Cordova, City Council of Rancho Cordova, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive. Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 23WM000122.
16.4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Agency Designated Representatives: Mayor David Sander and City Attorney Adam U. Lindgren; Unrepresented Employee: City Manager.
17. OPEN SESSION - REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
The City Attorney will report on action taken in closed session.
18. ADJOURNMENT
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Special Meetings listed below are subject to change/cancellation without further notice.
Unless the Council adopts a motion to extend the meeting, any item that is not initiated before 11:00 p.m. will be continued to the next day at 5:30 p.m. or scheduled on the next regular meeting agenda of the Council.
Public documents related to items on the open session portion of this agenda, which are distributed to the City Council less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, shall be available for public inspection at the time the documents are distributed to the Council. Documents are available for inspection at the City Clerk's office located in Rancho Cordova City Hall.
Rancho Cordova City Council - AMENDED AGENDA
Regular Meeting of Monday, December 18, 2023
The agenda items are accessible on the City’s website at www.cityofranchocordova.org on Thursdays or Fridays prior to the Regular City Council Meeting.
TENTATIVE UPCOMING MEETINGS
January 2, 2024 4:00 PM Special Meeting/Regular Meeting January 16, 2024 5:30 PM Regular Meeting
If you have any technical questions related to the agenda items, please contact City Hall at (916) 851-8700.
The Rancho Cordova City Council meeting will be videotaped in its entirety and will be cablecast without interruption on Metro Cable 14, the Government Affairs Channel on the Comcast, Consolidated Communications and AT&T U-Verse Systems. Closed Captioning will be available on the playback cablecast. A DVD copy is available from the City Clerk’s Department and a webcast of this meeting will be available for viewing via video streaming from the City’s website within 48 hours of adjournment of this meeting.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 851-8720 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA
I, Stacy Leitner, City Clerk for the City of Rancho Cordova, declare that the foregoing agenda for the December 18, 2023, Regular Meeting of the Rancho Cordova City Council was posted and available for review on December 14, 2023, at City Hall of the City of Rancho Cordova, 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, California, 95670. The agenda is also available on the city website at www.cityofranchocordova.org.
Signed December 14, 2023, at Rancho Cordova, California.
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, November 6, 2023
4:00 PM - Special Meeting/Closed Session
5:30 PM – Regular Meeting
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
DRAFT MINUTES
1. SPECIAL MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Budge called the Special meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 4:08 p.m.
Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Stacy Leitner, Adam Lindgren, Persephonie Riley, and Micah Runner
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. James Garcia
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
3. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Budge adjourned the meeting to closed session at 4:10 p.m.
4. CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER ROLL/ROLL CALL
Mayor Budge called closed session to order at 4:11 p.m.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, November 6, 2023
Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Adam Lindgren and Micah Runner
5. CLOSED SESSION
Council met in closed session to discuss the following items:
5.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Stone Creek Residents for Smart Growth, an unincorporated association v. City of Rancho Cordova, Respondent; Dermody Properties, and DOES 1-10 Real Parties in Interest. Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 23WM000026.
5.2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)(One case, based on a letter dated October 24, 2023 to the Mayor and Council from Matthew Henderson of Miller Starr Regalia and testimony by Mr. Henderson at the October 24, 2023 City Council meeting opposing and threatening litigation on the proposed Ordinance amending sections of the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area).
6. OPEN SESSION - REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Adam Lindgren reported that staff was given direction and no reportable action was taken in closed session.
7. ADJOURN TO REGULAR MEETING
Mayor Budge adjourned closed session to the Regular meeting at 5:32 p.m.
8. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Budge called the Regular meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 5:32 p.m.
Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Stacy Leitner, Adam Lindgren, Persephonie Riley, and Micah Runner
9. METRO CABLE TV TELEVISION ANNOUNCEMENT
The City Clerk read the meetings recordings and playback schedule.
10. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Sheryl Longsworth led the pledge.
11. INVOCATION
Dr. Dan DeShong with River City Christian Church gave the invocation.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, November 6, 2023
12. PRESENTATIONS
12.1. City of Rancho Cordova's Inaugural Youth Poet Laureate.
12.2. 2023 California Capital Airshow Report.
12.3. Rancho Cordova FiberCity Update provided by SiFi.
12.4. Vice Mayor Sander's Birthday on November 25, 2023.
13. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. Sheryl Longsworth
2. Fayzah Mughal
3. Helen Whelan-Bashaw
4. Tera Kolvenbach
5. Bhaskar Vempati
6. Rosie Yacoub
7. Carl Salmonsen
8. Wayne Watts
9. Lisa Sanchez
10. Lilia Hogan
11. Katie McCammon
12. Camila Vogel
13. Roland H. Brady
14. Mary Tappel
15. Kathleen Ford
16. Teresa Spaulding
17. Greta Lacin
18. Mia Vandiver
19. Terry Joyce
20. Brynn Dickinson
21. Juleen Stenzel
22. Stephanie Mullen
23. Katy Justice and Todd Gledhill
24. Gwyn “Sage” Pasquale
25. Leslie Stradley and Craig Stradley
26. Catherine Vigran
27. Dmitriy Goloin
28. David Telander
29. Mark Heinrichs
30. David Ingram
31. Pam Kennedy
32. Gisla Dewey
33. Muriel Strand
34. Kay and Lee Yager
35. Lyndi Shaw
36. James Garcia
37. Ivory Rubin
38. Jennifer Garcia
39. Brenda Gustin
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, November 6, 2023
40. Marilyn Metzger
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
14. COUNCIL REPORTS
Council reported on events since the last meeting.
15. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Micah Runner gave his report.
16. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE
Mayor Budge stated that item 16.2 would be pulled for separate discussion.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 16.1 and 16.3 through 16.7 by Terry second by Gatewood;
Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
16.1. Subject: Meeting Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of October 16, 2023, and the Special Meeting of October 24, 2023.
Recommendation: Adopt the minutes.
16.2. Subject: Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova Amending Certain Sections of the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area to Revise Permitted Uses in the M-1 (Light Industrial) and MP (Office Industrial Park) Zones, Including Amending Certain Text and Tables in the Sacramento County Zoning Code that are Incorporated and Applied in the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area (CEQA Exempt Pursuant to Guideline Section 15061(b)(3)).
Recommendation: Waive the second reading and adopt the Ordinance.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. James Garcia
2. Greg Muilenburg
3. Jennifer Garcia
4. Helen Whelan-Bashaw
5. Chong Jen Chen
6. Tony Hamilton
7. Paul Carroll
8. Salina Wong
9. Mary Miller
10. Marilyn Metzger
11. Elisha Abbot
12. Sara Malone
13. Dilip Nayak
14. Brenda Gustin
15. Valerie Knippschild
16. Regina Jones
17. Marta Darby
18. Eric Winegar
19. Kate Carroll
20. Eileen Sedilko
21. B. Fuller
22. Lynn Keay
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, November 6, 2023
23. Lisa Phenix
24. Lorie Hobart
25. David Higgins
26. Jonathan Lacoss
27. Valerie Knippschild
28. Lisa Burns
29. Elaine Khan
30. Ivory Rubin
31. Gerald Wilson
32. Katherine Whitcome
33. David Burns
34. Aman
35. Nani Berger
36. Kallie Pahwa
37. Dawn S. Davison
38. Pio Enriquez
39. Paul Carroll
40. Jordan Castelan
41. Skip Bradlee
42. Eileen Casuga
43. John Steelman
44. Jordan W.
45. Ernesto and Keiko Lopez
46. Sharon Muilenburg
47. Gregory (Greg) Muilenburg
48. Gerald Wilson
49. Alan and Melissa Vosper
50. Jess Cortez
51. Matt & Michelle Jost
52. David Ferguson
53. Daneece and Gene Adair
54. Mark Berry
55. Jacob Steelman
56. Timothy Johnson and Elaine Rice
57. James Adams
58. Janet Teghtmeyer
59. Nicole Mullnix
60. Vera Ferguson
61. James Garcia
62. Brenda Gustin
63. Marilyn Metzger
64. Yolanda Cu
65. Albert Cu
66. Matthew C. Henderson
67. Eric Winegar
68. Don Session
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 16.2 by Terry second by Gatewood; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
16.3. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Contract Amendment
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, November 6, 2023
No. 09-2019-1 with Ziebron Group to Increase the Contract Amount from $100,000 to an Amount not to Exceed $150,000, to Increase the Hourly Rate from $275 Per Hour to $310 Per Hour and Extend the Contract Term from December 31, 2023, to June 30, 2025, for the South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan Permitting.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
16.4. Subject: A Resolution Calling the Special Election in City of Rancho Cordova Grantline 220 Community Facilities District No. 2023-1.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution and rescind Resolution No. 121-2023.
16.5. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the Public Works Director to Execute and Submit CalRecycle Grant Documents.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
16.6. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Sign a Letter of Agency with Capitol Jackson Partners.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
16.7. Subject: Measure R and Measure H/Community Enhancement & Investment Fund Citizen Oversight Board Appointments.
Recommendation: Appoint two (2), one-year term At-Large/Student appointees to fill the combined Measure R and Measure H/Community Enhancement & Investment Fund Citizen Oversight Board.
17. CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 17.1 and 17.2 by Sander second by Terry; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
17.1. Subject: A Resolution Approving the Community Development Block Grant 2024 Annual Action Plan.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
17.2. Subject: A Resolution Creating Special Tax Area Zone 8 and an Ordinance Establishing a Special Tax for Transit-Related Services for the Ranch Active Adult Project.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution creating special transit tax area Zone 8 and waive the first reading and introduce the Ordinance, establishing a special tax for transit- related services for the Ranch Active Adult project.
18. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
None.
RECESS 7:28 PM - 7:47 PM
19. REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS
19.1. Subject: A Resolution Approving a Grant Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cordova and Cordova Community Council Foundation for the Mine Shaft Building Transfer of Ownership and Relocation and a Resolution Approving a Loan Agreement with the Cordova Community Council Foundation for the Mine Shaft Building Renovation and Expansion Project.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolutions.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, November 6, 2023
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 19.1. by Terry second by Gatewood; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
19.2. Subject: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova Designating a Time and Place for Hearing Protests in Connection with a Proposed Stormwater Utility 1 Fee Increase, Approving Procedures in Connection Therewith and Taking Certain Other Actions.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. James Garcia
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to move forward with a proposed annual rate of $156.79/SFR with inflation to be implemented over the next five (5) years and for staff to return to Council with an updated Resolution by Pulipati second by Sander; Motion passed with a 3:2 vote.
AYES: Pulipati, Sander, and Budge
NOES: Gatewood and Terry
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
19.3. Subject: Fiscal Year 2022-23 Preliminary Year-End Financial Report and Budget Amendment and a Resolution Authorizing the Budget Amendment.
Recommendation: Receive the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Preliminary Year-End Financial Report and adopt the proposed budget amendment Resolution.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 19.3. by Gatewood second by Terry; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
19.4. Subject: Selection of the 2024 Mayor and Vice Mayor.
Recommendation: Council selection of the 2024 Mayor and Vice Mayor.
ACTION: Motion to appoint Siri Pulipati as Vice Mayor and David Sander as Mayor in 2024 by Budge second by Terry;
Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. James Garcia
2. Helen Whelan-Bashaw
3. Brenda Gustin
4. Jennifer Garcia
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, November 6, 2023
19.5. Subject: Cancellation of the November 20, 2023 City Council Meeting.
Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council cancel the Monday, November 20, 2023 City Council meeting due to the lack of a quorum present in the Council Chambers.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 19.5. by Sander second by Terry; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
20. COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
1. Planning Commission Qualifications
21. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Budge adjourned the meeting at 8:49 p.m.
___________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 2
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, December 4, 2023
4:00 PM – Special Meeting
5:30 PM – Regular Meeting
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
DRAFT MINUTES
1. SPECIAL MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Budge called the Special meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 4:09 p.m.
Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Stacy Leitner, Adam Lindgren, Persephonie Riley, and Micah Runner
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Budge stated that public comment would be taken at the time the item on the agenda was heard.
3. SPECIAL MEETING ITEMS
3.1. Subject: Community Engagement Division Update
Recommendation: Receive the presentation and provide feedback.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. Giovanni Ottolini
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 2
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, December 4, 2023
ACTION: Input was received regarding Community Engagement Division Update.
3.2. Subject: A Presentation on the Monier Circle Stormwater Detention Basin Project Recommendation: Receive presentation on the progress of the Monier Circle Stormwater Detention Basin Project.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers. Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Input was received regarding the presentation on the Monier Circle Stormwater Detention Basin Project.
4. ADJOURN TO REGULAR MEETING
Mayor Budge adjourned to the Regular meeting at 5:04 p.m.
5. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Budge called the Regular meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 5:33 p.m.
Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Stacy Leitner, Adam Lindgren, Persephonie Riley, and Micah Runner
6. METRO CABLE TV TELEVISION ANNOUNCEMENT
The City Clerk read the meetings recordings and playback schedule.
7. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Assistant City Manager David Kwong led the pledge.
8. INVOCATION
There was a moment of silence in lieu of the invocation.
9. SPECIAL CEREMONIES - SWEAR IN MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR
ACTION: Motion to continue items 9.1 through 9.3 by Gatewood second by Terry; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
9.1. Swearing in of Vice Mayor.
9.2. Swearing in of Mayor.
9.3. Presentation to Outgoing Mayor Budge.
10. CELEBRATORY BREAK
There was no Celebratory Break.
11. PRESENTATIONS
11.1. Folsom Cordova Unified School District Presentation on Facilities and Funding
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 2
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, December 4, 2023
1. Madelaine Sanderson
2. James Garcia
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
12. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. Giovanni Ottolini
2. Julio Olague
3. James Garcia
4. Helen Whelan-Bashaw
5. Meada Cashatt
6. Sergio Diaz
7. Lyndi Shaw
8. Sergio Diaz
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
13. COUNCIL REPORTS
Council reported on events since the last meeting.
14. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Micah Runner gave his report.
15. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE
Mayor Budge stated that item 15.1 would be pulled for separate discussion.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 15.2 through 15.5 by Terry second by Gatewood; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
15.1. Subject: Meeting Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of November 6, 2023, the Special City Council Meeting of November 13, 2023, and the Special City Council Meeting of November 28, 2023.
Recommendation: Adopt the minutes.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. James Garcia
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to continue item 15.1 to a date uncertain by Gatewood second by Pulipati;
Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
15.2. Subject: Second Reading of an Ordinance Establishing a Special Tax Zone 8 for Transit-Related Services for The Ranch Active Adult Project.
Recommendation: Waive second reading and adopt the Ordinance.
15.3. Subject: A Resolution Declaring the Results of the Mail Ballot Election Relating to the Imposition of the Annual Stormwater Utility Fee on The Ranch Active Adult Project in the
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 2
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, December 4, 2023
City of Rancho Cordova.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution declaring the results of the mail ballot election relating to the imposition of the annual Stormwater Utility Fee on The Ranch Active Adult project.
15.4. Subject: A Resolution to Approve the Execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments to Receive Green Means Go Capital Project Grant Funds in the Amount of $5,000,000 for the Mills Crossing Project.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
15.5. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Prohousing Incentive Pilot Program.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
16. CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 16.1 by Gatewood second by Terry; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
16.1. Subject: An Ordinance Amending Title 23, Chapter 23.325 Overlay Zoning Districts, Chapter 23.716 Landscaping, Chapter 23.719 Parking and Loading, Chapter 23.734 Accessory Structures, Chapter 23.743 Signs, and Chapter 23.1104 Definitions (CEQA Exemption Found in Guideline Section 15061(B)(3).
Recommendation: Waive the first reading and introduce the Ordinance.
17. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
None.
18. REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS
Mayor Budge stated that item 18.2 would be heard before item 18.1.
18.2. Subject: A Resolution Designating a Time and Place for Hearing Protests in Connection with a Proposed Stormwater Utility 1 Fee Increase, Approving Procedures in Connection Therewith and Taking Certain Other Actions.
Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 18.2 by Sander second by Pulipati; Motion passed with a 3:2 vote.
AYES: Pulipati, Sander, and Budge
NOES: Gatewood and Terry
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
18.1. Subject: Discussion Regarding Residential Solid Waste Collection and Street Sweeping Services Contract with Atlas Disposal Industries for the Contract Term Beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2034.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 2
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, December 4, 2023
Recommendation: Award the residential solid waste collection and street sweeping contract to Atlas Disposal Industries LLC (Atlas) for the contract term beginning January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2034, and direct staff to finalize a contract for City Council approval at a subsequent date.
Council Member Terry recused himself from item 18.1 due to a potential conflict of interest related to his wife's current employer and one of the applicants.
Council Member Terry left the meeting at 7:02 p.m.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. Madelaine Sanderson
2. Andrea O'Gorma
3. Bonnie Patterson
4. Greg Kurtz
5. Joyce Rosenberg
6. Art Capps
7. Annah Rulon
8. Sergey Ivannikov
9. Dawn Carlson
10. Manual Gouveia
11. Joe Devlin
12. Nathan Shahbaz
13. Renee Flores-DeVan
14. Konat Vanterpool
15. George Holquin
16. Lisa Mccarrick
17. Tiffany Brown
18. Nick Sikich
19. Brian Waters
20. Dave Sikich
21. Carrie Johnson
22. Tera Kolvenbach
23. Helen Whelan-Bashaw
24. Colin Wallace
25. Michelle Smira
26. David Kuhnen
27. Gagan Bhullar
28. Gabriel De La Torre
29. Brandon Ramer
30. David Gieselman
31. Dave Sikich
32. Darryl Palmer
33. Debbie Cederdahl
34. Dennis Campbell
35. Jayna DeSoiza
36. Kimberly Harris
37. Rudy Oberhauser
38. Suzette Sneath
39. Adam and Maggy Krauth
40. Al Michaels
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 2
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, December 4, 2023
41. Katherine Ellis
42. Ian Campbell
43. Melissa Shorey
44. The Hardin Family
45. Owen Lefebvre
46. Alex Wormald
47. Baran Akpinar
48. Lisa Hayward
49. Kathleen Haupt
50. Adam Krautheim
51. Lina Mooney
52. Nikol Grubbs
53. Samuel Head, II
54. Carolyn Thomas
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to give a specific date to invite Atlas Disposal Industries and Republic Services to resubmit their applications with updates to the Rate Sheet and improvements to their original proposals in which additions to the proposals would not be allowed thereafter, and to continue item 18.1 to a date uncertain by Gatewood second by Budge;
Motion passed with a 4:0 vote.
AYES: Gatewood Pulipati, Sander, and Budge
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RECUSED: Terry
18.3. Subject: Appointment of Labor Negotiators.
Recommendation: Appoint Mayor David Sander and City Manager Micah Runner as Labor Negotiators for negotiations with the current City Attorney.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to approve item 18.3 by Gatewood second by Sander; Motion passed with a 4:0 vote.
AYES: Gatewood, Pulipati, Sander, and Budge
NOES: None
ABSENT: Terry
ABSTAIN: None
19. COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
1. To appoint Garrett Gatewood and Siri Pulipati to an Ad-hoc committee related to Information Technology
20. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Budge adjourned the meeting to closed session at 9:19 p.m.
21. CLOSED SESSION - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Budge called closed session to order at 9:19 p.m.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 2
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, December 4, 2023
Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: Donald Terry
Staff Members Present: Adam Lindgren and Micah Runner
22. CLOSED SESSION
Council met in closed session to discuss the following items:
22.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) 350 Sacramento, a California non- profit benefit corporation; and Oscar Balaguer v. City of Rancho Cordova, a general law city; City Council for the City of Rancho Cordova, and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive.
Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 23WM000101.
22.2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)(One case, based on a letter dated October 24, 2023, to the Mayor and Council from Matthew Henderson of Miller Starr Regalia and testimony by Mr. Henderson at the October 24, 2023 City Council meeting opposing and threatening litigation on the proposed Ordinance amending sections of the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area) (One case).
22.3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) DPML Bear Hollow, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and DPML Stonecreek, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company v. City of Rancho Cordova, City Council of Rancho Cordova, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive. Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 23WM000122.
22.4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Agency Designated Representatives: Mayor David Sander and City Manager Micah Runner; Unrepresented Employee: City Attorney.
23. OPEN SESSION - REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Adam Lindgren reported that Council took up items 22.2 and 22.3, staff was given direction and no reportable action was taken in closed session and that item
22.1 was continued to the next City Council meeting.
City Manager Micah Runner reported that an item would return to Council regarding the City Attorney Contract.
24. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Budge adjourned the meeting at 10:15 p.m.
___________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 3
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, November 13, 2023
10:00 AM – Special Meeting/Closed Session
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
DRAFT MINUTES
1. SPECIAL MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Vice Mayor Sander called the Special meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 10:03 a.m.
Council Members Present: Siri Pulipati, Donald Terry, and Vice Mayor David Sander Council Members Absent: Garrett Gatewood and Mayor Linda Budge Staff Members Present: Stacy Leitner, Adam Lindgren, Persephonie Riley, and Micah Runner
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Vice Mayor Sander opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Vice Mayor Sander closed the public comment period.
3. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Vice Mayor Sander adjourned the meeting to closed session at 10:05 a.m.
4. CLOSED SESSION - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Vice Mayor Sander called closed session to order at 10:05 a.m.
Council Members Present: Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge (arrived at 10:10 a.m.)
Council Members Absent: Garrett Gatewood
Staff Members Present: Adam Lindgren and Micah Runner
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 3
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, November 13, 2023
5. CLOSED SESSION
Council met in closed session to discuss the following item:
5.1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: City Manager: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.
6. OPEN SESSION - REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Adam Lidgren reported that the City Council conducted the City Manager's performance evaluation. The Council reports that the City Manager's performance has been impressive.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Budge adjourned the meeting at 11:32 a.m.
_____________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 4
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday, November 28, 2023
6:30 PM – Special Meeting/Work Session
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
DRAFT MINUTES
1. SPECIAL MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Budge called the Special meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 6:38 p.m.
Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood (arrived at 6:55 p.m.), Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Stacy Leitner, Adam Lindgren, Persephonie Riley, and Micah Runner
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Budge stated that public comment would be taken at the time each item on the Agenda was heard.
3. SPECIAL MEETING ITEMS
3.1. Subject: Neighborhood Traffic Management Project Phase VI Design Update.
Recommendation: Receive presentation.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Input was received regarding the Neighborhood Traffic Management Project Phase VI Design Update.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 4
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Tuesday, November 28, 2023
3.2. Subject: Baroque Drive Traffic Calming Project Update.
Recommendation: Receive the presentation and provide feedback.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. James Garcia
2. Jennifer Garcia
3. Salina Wong
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Input was received regarding the Baroque Drive Traffic Calming Project Update.
4. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Budge adjourned the meeting to closed session at 7:30 p.m.
5. CLOSED SESSION - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Budge called closed session to order at 7:30 p.m.
Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Adam Lindgren and Micah Runner
6. CLOSED SESSION
Council met in closed session to discuss the following items:
6.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)(One case, based on a letter dated October 24, 2023 to the Mayor and Council from Matthew Henderson of Miller Starr Regalia and testimony by Mr. Henderson at the October 24, 2023 City Council meeting opposing and threatening litigation on the proposed Ordinance amending sections of the Villages of Zinfandel Special Planning Area) (One case).
6.2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) 350 Sacramento, a California non- profit benefit corporation; and Oscar Balaguer v. City of Rancho Cordova, a general law city; City Council for the City of Rancho Cordova, and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive.
Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 23WM000101.
6.3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Stone Creek Residents for Smart Growth, an unincorporated association v. City of Rancho Cordova, Respondent; Dermody Properties, and DOES 1-10 Real Parties in Interest. Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 23WM000026.
6.4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)) Stone Creek Residents for Smart Growth, an unincorporated association v. City of Rancho Cordova, and DOES 1-10
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 4
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Tuesday, November 28, 2023
Respondent; Dermody Properties, and DOES 11-20 Real Parties in Interest.
Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 23WM000052.
7. OPEN SESSION - REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Adam Lindgren reported that Council took up items 6.1, 6.3, and 6.4, received updates from staff, provided direction and took no reportable action. Item 6.2 was continued to the December 4, 2023, City Council meeting.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Budge adjourned the meeting in memory and honor of Rosalynn Carter at 8:26 p.m.
___________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 5
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Wednesday, December 6, 2023
5:30 PM – Special Meeting
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
DRAFT MINUTES
1. SPECIAL MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor Budge called the Special meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 5:34 p.m.
Council Members Present: Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, David Sander, Donald Terry, and Mayor Linda Budge
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Stacy Leitner, Adam Lindgren, Persephonie Riley, and Micah Runner
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. James Garcia
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
3. SPECIAL MEETING ITEM
3.1. Subject: Cure and Correction of Alleged Brown Act Violation Relating to Council Selection of the 2024 Mayor and Vice Mayor.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council takes the following actions at the December 6, 2023 meeting:
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 5 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Wednesday, December 6, 2023
(1) Receive Staff Report.
(2) Receive public comment.
(3) Motion declaring the City Council’s intention to cure the alleged Brown Act violation on item 19.4 of the November 6, 2023 City Council meeting, and committing that the City Council will cease and desist from and not repeat the challenged past actions.
(4) Motion to rescind all actions taken on item 19.4 of the November 6, 2023 City Council meeting.
(5) Motion directing staff to respond to the December 4, 2023 demand in writing that the alleged violation has been cured and corrected.
(6) Motion to select the 2024 Mayor and Vice Mayor.
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. Tera Kolvenbach
2. Helen Whelan-Bashaw
3. James Garcia
4. Jennifer Garcia
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Motion to declare the City Council’s intention to cure the alleged Brown Act violation on item 19.4 of the November 6, 2023 City Council meeting, and committing that the City Council will cease and desist from and not repeat the challenged past actions and to rescind all actions taken on item 19.4 of the November 6, 2023 City Council meeting by Terry second by Pulipati;
Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
ACTION: Motion to direct staff to respond to the December 4, 2023 demand in writing that the alleged violation has been cured and corrected by Sander second by Terry;
Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
ACTION: Motion to appoint Siri Pulipati as Vice Mayor and David Sander as Mayor in 2024 by Budge second by Terry;
Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.
4. SPECIAL CEREMONIES - SWEAR IN MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR
Mayor Budge opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:
1. Anil Reddy
Mayor Budge closed the public comment period.
4.1. Swearing in of Vice Mayor.
4.2. Swearing in of Mayor.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 5 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Wednesday, December 6, 2023
4.3. Presentation to Outgoing Mayor Budge.
5. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Sander adjourned the meeting at 6:14 p.m.
____________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 6
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday, December 12, 2023
5:30 PM – Special Meeting/Work Session
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel - Lobby
101 South Adams Street
Tallahassee, FL 32301
No attendance from this location
DRAFT MINUTES
1. SPECIAL MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Vice Mayor Pulipati called the Special meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 5:40 p.m.
Council Members Present: Linda Budge, Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, and Donald Terry
Council Members Absent: Mayor David Sander
Staff Members Present: Haley Arata, Stacy Leitner, Adam Lindgren, and Micah Runner
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
At a special meeting, citizens wishing to address the Council for any matter on the agenda may do so at the time the matter is discussed. Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not on the agenda.
3. SPECIAL MEETING
3.1. Subject: Economic Development Strategic Plan Proposals.
ITEM 9.1. ATTACHMENT 6 Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Tuesday, December 12, 2023
Recommendation: Receive recommendations from the City Council regarding the selection of the top consulting firms to move forward with the development of the Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP).
Council Member Gatewood left the meeting at 6:35 p.m.
Vice Mayor Pulipati opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Vice Mayor Pulipati closed the public comment period.
ACTION: Input was received regarding the Economic Development Strategic Plan proposals.
4. ADJOURNMENT
Vice Mayor Pulipati adjourned the meeting at 7:36 p.m.
_________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 5
\
MEMORANDUM
ITEM 9.2.
DATE:December 18, 2023
TO:Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:Kim Juran-Karageorgiou, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: TREASURER’S REPORT – SEPTEMBER 30, 2023
RECOMMENDATION
This report is informational only. It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the September 30, 2023, Treasurer’s Report.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Treasurer’s Report is required to be submitted to the City Council at least quarterly in accordance with California Government Code Section 53600 et. seq. The purpose of the Treasurer’s Report is to update the City Council and the public on the status of the City’s cash balances and investments and highlight material changes from one period to another. The scope of this report covers the third quarter of the 2023 calendar year ending September 30, 2023, and is in compliance with the State’s reporting requirements.
BACKGROUND
Attached is the quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the period ending September 30, 2023.
Treasurer’s Reports are provided to the City Council on a quarterly basis.
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 5
At June 30, 2023, the value of the City’s total portfolio was $286.5 million. Since that time, the City’s cash balances decreased by $7.1 million with an ending balance of $279.4 million as of September 30, 2023. The funds are held as follows:
The Federal Reserve followed up on the three rate increases it had implemented during the first two quarters of 2023 with a fourth, .25% rate increase in July, bringing the new target interest rate range to 5.25%-5.5%. U.S. Treasury yields increased across the entire yield curve during the third quarter, with most tenors closing the quarter at multi-decade highs. While these rising interest rates bring the market value of the City’s portfolio down, the City is seeing higher interest earnings on its investments and reinvesting securities that have reached maturity at higher rates, when feasible. Consumer spending was down from previous estimates, bringing Investment Distribution Book Value Market Value
Cash at Banking Institutions 89,349,079 89,349,079
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 6,361,676 6,361,676 CAMP Pool 58,402,296 58,402,296
CAMP Managed Account 65,492,667 62,991,666
Insight Investment 63,679,167 62,314,203
Total 283,284,886 279,418,921
Cash at Banking
Institutions 32.0%
Local Agency
Investment Fund
(LAIF) 2.3%
CAMP Pool 20.9%,
CAMP Managed
Account 22.5%
Insight Investment
22.3%
Investment Portfolio
City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 5
into question the consumer’s ability to continue to carry the economy as economic headwinds such as high gas prices, slowing wage growth, and the depletion of savings accumulated during the pandemic mount.
The City’s cash balance as of September 30, 2023, was allocated by fund type/purpose as follows:
•General Fund: $18 million
•Community Enhancement & Investment Fund (Measure H & R): $14.4 million •Sunrise Development Impact Fees (restricted for specific improvements needed as a result of development in the area): $40.2 million
•Transportation Funds: $82 million
•Storm Drain Fund: $19.3 million
•Capital Projects/Grant/Special Revenue Funds: $81 million •Agency Funds (funds held for other entities): $28.4 million The overall portfolio is well-diversified with $129.2 million invested in marketable securities, $64.8 million is invested in short-term investments that are considered liquid (LAIF, CAMP, and money markets), and another $89.3 million is on deposit with our banks, which includes $5.4 million on deposit with one local bank as part of the City’s participation in a local banking initiative. Staff, in conjunction with our financial advisors, periodically review the mix of liquid and long-term investments and adjust the portfolio according to the market conditions and our short- term cash needs.
Staff thoroughly review investment statements and make appropriate inquiries of its investment advisors to confirm the existence and viability of the City’s assets. The City invests conservatively in investment policy options in accordance with California State Government Code. The long-term assets are in securities that can be held to maturity, thus are less vulnerable to the fluctuations of the market. All securities are in compliance with the City’s investment policy. There are sufficient funds to meet the City’s expenditure requirements for the next six months.
City Council Staff Report - Page 4 of 5
The distribution of investments is displayed in the following charts:
Under 1 Year
67.2%
1 to 3 Years
17.4%
Over 3 Years
15.5%
Investment Ladder
Short Term Investment
Pool 55.2%
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
18.0%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note
0.4%
Municipal
Bond / Note
0.8%
Federal Agency Commerical
Mortgage-Backed Security
2.2%
Federal Agency
Bond / Note 9.6%
Corporate Note 4.4%
Corporate Bonds
6.4%
Certificate of Deposit 0.6%
Asset-Backed Security
2.4%
Allocation By Security Type
City Council Staff Report - Page 5 of 5
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. City of Rancho Cordova Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2023
Security Held Book Value Market Value
Wells Fargo Bank 83,906,772 83,906,772
5 Star Bank 5,442,307 5,442,307
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 6,361,676 6,361,676 CAMP Pool 58,402,296 58,402,296
CAMP Managed Account 65,492,667 62,991,666
Insight Investment 63,679,167 62,314,203
Total 283,284,886
279,418,921
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
TREASURER'S REPORT
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED September 30, 2023
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2023
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Cash and Cash Equivalents
0.000 3 4,292.59 34,292.59 0.00 0.00 0.0534,292.5934,292.59Cash and Cash Equivalents Total Cash and Cash Equivalents 34,292.59 34,292.59 34,292.59 0.00 0.050.0034,292.59 Corporate Bonds
02665WCT6 3 .550 01/12/2024 654,468.00 605,115.78 (9,010.69) 4,615.00 1.02596,105.09600,000.00AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 3.55% 12JAN2024 17325FAS7 3.650 01/23/2024 1,076,820.00 1,007,068.80 (13,946.44) 6,793.06 12/23/2023
1.69993,122.361,000,000.00CITIBANK NA 3.65% 23JAN2024 (CALLABLE 23DEC23) 459200HU8 3.625 02/12/2024 652,356.00 606,563.15 (11,486.12) 2,900.00 1.02595,077.03600,000.00IBM CORP 3.625% 12FEB2024 037833CU2 2.850 05/11/2024 413,260.00 401,365.00 (8,214.54) 4,401.67 03/11/2024
0.65393,150.46400,000.00APPLE INC 2.85% 11MAY2024 (CALLABLE 11MAR24) 14913R2L0 0.450 05/17/2024 998,760.00 999,710.11 (31,004.15) 1,662.50 1.56968,705.961,000,000.00CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 0.45% 17MAY2024 931142DV2 2.650 12/15/2024 1,009,812.00 970,206.76 (49,841.18) 7,342.71 10/15/2024
1.58920,365.58950,000.00WALMART INC 2.65% 15DEC2024 (CALLABLE 15OCT24) 166764BW9 1.554 05/11/2025 1,525,696.00 1,560,137.93 (54,752.17) 9,600.27 04/11/2025
2.391,505,385.761,600,000.00CHEVRON CORP 1.554% 11MAY2025 (CALLABLE 11APR25)
24422ETC3 3.400 09/11/2025 593,280.00 595,686.15 (17,844.11) 1,076.67 0.93577,842.04600,000.00JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 3.4% 11SEP2025 478160BY9 2.450 03/01/2026 949,330.00 954,548.33 (15,277.11) 1,973.61 12/01/2025
1.49939,271.221,000,000.00JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.45% 01MAR2026 (CALLABLE 01DEC25)
06051GFX2 3.500 04/19/2026 768,064.00 770,234.09 (14,946.98) 12,522.22 1.20755,287.11800,000.00BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.5% 19APR2026 8 ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2023
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Corporate Bonds
023135BX3 1 .000 05/12/2026 902,520.00 911,875.09 (12,787.55) 3,833.33 04/12/2026
1.41899,087.541,000,000.00AMAZON.COM INC 1% 12MAY2026 (CALLABLE 12APR26)
46625HRS1 3.200 06/15/2026 949,700.00 963,591.31 (23,409.06) 9,333.33 03/15/2026
1.49940,182.251,000,000.00JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.2% 15JUN2026 (CALLABLE 15MAR26)
693475AX3 2.600 07/23/2026 741,568.00 745,192.95 (6,859.45) 3,871.11 05/24/2026
1.16738,333.50800,000.00PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES 2.6% 23JUL2026 (CALLABLE 23MAY26)
89236TDR3 3.200 01/11/2027 1,031,052.00 1,033,256.08 (4,731.85) 7,724.44 1.611,028,524.231,100,000.00TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 3.2% 11JAN2027 24422EWD7 2.350 03/08/2027 553,404.00 556,886.51 (12,834.11) 861.67 0.87544,052.40600,000.00JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 2.35% 08MAR2027 437076CA8 2.500 04/15/2027 1,398,930.00 1,406,348.66 (37,938.21) 17,187.50 02/15/2027
2.191,368,410.451,500,000.00HOME DEPOT INC 2.5% 15APR2027 (CALLABLE 15FEB27)
91159HHR4 3.150 04/27/2027 789,072.00 792,086.90 (15,462.96) 11,379.38 03/27/2027
1.23776,623.94850,000.00US BANCORP 3.15% 27APR2027 (CALLABLE 27MAR27) 194162AN3 3.100 08/15/2027 1,501,091.98 1,505,541.65 (39,164.53) 6,072.13 07/15/2027
2.351,466,377.121,567,000.00COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO 3.1% 15AUG2027 (CALLABLE 15JUL27)
037833DB3 2.900 09/12/2027 850,563.00 858,816.98 (27,747.75) 1,305.00 06/12/2027
1.33831,069.23900,000.00APPLE INC 2.9% 12SEP2027 (CALLABLE 12JUN27) 89236TKL8 5.450 11/10/2027 512,655.00 511,906.80 (10,258.34) 10,597.22 0.80501,648.46500,000.00TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 5.45% 10NOV2027 02665WED9 4.700 01/12/2028 611,328.00 610,378.95 (27,333.03) 6,110.00 0.96583,045.92600,000.00AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 4.7% 12JAN2028 Total Corporate Bonds 18,483,729.98 18,366,517.98 17,921,667.65 (444,850.33) 28.93131,162.8218,967,000.00 9 ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2023
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Agencies
3133EKKU9 2 .300 11/08/2023 1,122,682.00 1,100,545.86 (4,148.01) 9,979.44 1.761,096,397.851,100,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.3% 08NOV2023 3133EJ2B4 3.000 12/06/2023 1,339,837.50 1,256,131.62 (11,734.47) 11,875.00 2.101,244,397.151,250,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3% 06DEC2023 3134GVP51 0.500 12/15/2023 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 (10,182.90) 1,458.33 1.56989,817.101,000,000.00FREDDIE MAC 0.5% 15DEC2023 CALLABLE 3133EKMX1 2.230 02/23/2024 2,129,174.84 2,102,537.71 (30,310.57) 4,813.08 3.332,072,227.142,100,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.23% 23FEB2024 3130AMQQ8 0.350 04/23/2024 999,000.00 999,802.34 (28,692.91) 943.06 12/23/2023
1.56971,109.431,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.35% 23APR2024 (CALLABLE 23DEC23)
3130A1XJ2 2.875 06/14/2024 881,814.28 842,082.09 (23,079.30) 7,068.51 1.38819,002.79835,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.875% 14JUN2024 3135GAC90 0.250 07/15/2024 500,000.00 500,000.00 (20,577.80) 260.42 10/15/2023
0.78479,422.20500,000.00FANNIE MAE 0.25% 15JUL2024 (CALLABLE 15OCT23) 3130AL2A1 0.500 02/10/2025 1,002,860.00 1,000,000.00 (65,880.56) 694.44 11/10/2023
1.57934,119.441,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.5% 10FEB2025 (CALLABLE 10NOV23)
3133ENP95 4.250 09/30/2025 1,151,759.50 1,151,176.27 (20,658.89) 24,437.50 1.801,130,517.381,150,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.25% 30SEP2025 3133EPMB8 4.125 12/08/2025 1,484,865.00 1,486,584.50 (17,065.41) 19,250.00 2.321,469,519.091,500,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.125% 08DEC2025 3133EPCF0 4.500 03/02/2026 1,120,416.00 1,116,971.16 (28,595.64) 3,850.00 1.751,088,375.521,100,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.5% 02MAR2026 3133EPHH1 4.000 04/28/2026 906,378.30 905,542.19 (26,456.61) 15,200.00 1.42879,085.58900,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4% 28APR2026 10 ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2023
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Agencies
3130AN4T4 0 .875 06/12/2026 903,900.00 912,864.55 (14,164.05) 2,625.00 1.41898,700.501,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.875% 12JUN2026 3130AWLZ1 4.750 06/12/2026 1,146,607.50 1,146,692.57 (2,520.97) 12,138.89 1.791,144,171.601,150,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.75% 12JUN2026 3133EPNG6 4.375 06/23/2026 1,000,360.00 1,000,326.76 (13,450.46) 11,788.19 1.57986,876.301,000,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.375% 23JUN2026 3133ENV72 4.500 07/27/2026 998,761.20 999,064.69 (12,051.45) 7,875.00 1.56987,013.241,000,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.5% 27JUL2026 3130APJH9 1.000 10/28/2026 1,178,866.00 1,201,456.33 (29,466.20) 5,488.89 10/28/2023
1.841,171,990.131,300,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1% 28OCT2026 (CALLABLE 28OCT23) #0006
3130ATUS4 4.250 12/10/2027 1,206,438.70 1,205,600.48 (26,559.79) 15,583.33 1.891,179,040.691,200,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.25% 10DEC2027 3133EN5N6 4.000 01/06/2028 904,194.00 903,637.48 (31,091.45) 8,400.00 1.42872,546.03900,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4% 06JAN2028 3130ATS57 4.500 03/10/2028 1,014,989.00 1,013,316.16 (18,698.27) 2,500.00 1.59994,617.891,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.5% 10MAR2028 3130AWC24 4.000 06/09/2028 999,822.81 999,832.81 (28,656.26) 13,222.22 1.56971,176.551,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4% 09JUN2028 Total Government Agencies 22,992,726.63 22,844,165.57 22,380,123.60 (464,041.97) 35.98179,451.3022,985,000.00 Government Bonds
912828T26 1 .375 09/30/2023 985,940.85 1,000,000.00 0.00 6,875.00 1.541,000,000.001,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.375% 30SEP2023 912828T91 1.625 10/31/2023 512,638.39 500,523.78 (2,007.01) 3,378.06 0.80498,516.77500,000.00USA TREASURY 1.625% 31OCT2023 11 ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2023
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Bonds
91282CDM0 0 .500 11/30/2023 1,191,894.65 1,199,285.51 (8,798.38) 2,000.00 1.871,190,487.131,200,000.00USA TREASURY 0.5% 30NOV2023 912828W71 2.125 03/31/2024 1,019,143.98 1,002,167.91 (18,535.10) 10,625.00 1.59983,632.811,000,000.00USA TREASURY 2.125% 31MAR2024 91282CCG4 0.250 06/15/2024 894,413.17 898,670.05 (30,978.65) 657.79 1.40867,691.40900,000.00USA TREASURY 0.25% 15JUN2024 912828YE4 1.250 08/31/2024 1,180,999.95 1,159,275.14 (52,489.98) 1,184.75 1.851,106,785.161,150,000.00USA TREASURY 1.25% 31AUG2024 912828YH7 1.500 09/30/2024 929,077.23 909,510.51 (43,682.38) 6,750.00 1.45865,828.13900,000.00USA TREASURY 1.5% 30SEP2024 912828YY0 1.750 12/31/2024 1,041,253.35 1,015,679.70 (58,882.82) 4,375.00 1.63956,796.881,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.75% 31DEC2024 91282CGU9 3.875 03/31/2025 984,143.98 986,611.56 (6,494.37) 19,375.00 1.54980,117.191,000,000.00USA TREASURY 3.875% 31MAR2025 9128284M9 2.875 04/30/2025 965,862.73 970,940.59 (6,448.40) 11,953.13 1.51964,492.191,000,000.00USA TREASURY 2.875% 30APR2025 912828XZ8 2.750 06/30/2025 1,059,999.78 1,065,737.08 (9,565.20) 7,562.50 1.661,056,171.881,100,000.00USA TREASURY 2.75% 30JUN2025 912828Y79 2.875 07/31/2025 964,534.60 969,180.52 (8,321.14) 4,765.63 1.51960,859.381,000,000.00USA TREASURY 2.875% 31JUL2025 91282CAJ0 0.250 08/31/2025 1,279,250.00 1,327,342.70 (49,897.38) 288.46 2.001,277,445.321,400,000.00USA TREASURY 0.25% 31AUG2025 9128285J5 3.000 10/31/2025 739,660.72 743,196.43 (23,020.64) 9,354.62 1.16720,175.79750,000.00USA TREASURY 3% 31OCT2025 12 ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2023
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Bonds
9128285N6 2 .875 11/30/2025 962,347.10 966,605.71 (9,965.09) 9,583.33 1.51956,640.621,000,000.00USA TREASURY 2.875% 30NOV2025 912828YD6 1.375 08/31/2026 913,909.60 921,360.44 (14,055.75) 1,133.24 1.43907,304.691,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.375% 31AUG2026 91282CCZ2 0.875 09/30/2026 899,612.73 908,159.89 (15,816.14) 4,375.00 1.41892,343.751,000,000.00USA TREASURY 0.875% 30SEP2026 91282CDK4 1.250 11/30/2026 906,487.73 914,063.78 (16,798.16) 4,166.67 1.42897,265.621,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.25% 30NOV2026 91282CDQ1 1.250 12/31/2026 904,104.91 911,618.80 (15,837.55) 3,125.00 1.41895,781.251,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.25% 31DEC2026 91282CEC1 1.875 02/28/2027 922,698.66 928,543.54 (18,387.29) 1,545.33 1.44910,156.251,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.875% 28FEB2027 91282CET4 2.625 05/31/2027 1,031,253.68 1,032,858.26 (10,287.94) 9,625.00 1.611,022,570.321,100,000.00USA TREASURY 2.625% 31MAY2027 91282CEW7 3.250 06/30/2027 1,255,875.45 1,258,710.52 (23,558.17) 10,562.50 1.971,235,152.351,300,000.00USA TREASURY 3.25% 30JUN2027 91282CFU0 4.125 10/31/2027 843,893.47 844,148.40 (12,244.10) 14,577.62 1.32831,904.30850,000.00USA TREASURY 4.125% 31OCT2027 Total Government Bonds 22,388,996.71 22,434,190.82 21,978,119.18 (456,071.64) 35.04147,838.6323,150,000.00 Grand total 63,899,745.91 63,679,166.96 (1,364,963.94)65,136,292.59 100.00458,452.7562,314,203.02 13 ITEM 9.2.
ATTACHMENT 1
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 1
ITEM 9.3.
DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Arlene Granadosin-Jones, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 23, CHAPTER 23.325 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS, CHAPTER 23.716 LANDSCAPING, CHAPTER 23.719 PARKING AND LOADING,
CHAPTER 23.734 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, CHAPTER 23.743
SIGNS, AND CHAPTER 23.1104 DEFINITIONS (CEQA EXEMPTION
FOUND IN GUIDELINE SECTION 15061(B)(3))
RECOMMENDATION
Waive the second reading and adopt the Ordinance.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Ordinance would result in amendments to Title 23 Zoning Code, as further described in Attachment 2 of this staff report.
BACKGROUND
On December 4, the City Council waived the first reading and passed to a second reading of the Ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
There is no fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Ordinance
2. Exhibit A to the Ordinance
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 4
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
ORDINANCE NO. XX-2023
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 23, CHAPTER 23.325 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS, CHAPTER 23.716 LANDSCAPING, CHAPTER 23.719 PARKING & LOADING, CHAPTER 23.734 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, CHAPTER 23.743 SIGNS, AND CHAPTER
23.1104 DEFINITIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Purpose and Declarations.
WHEREAS, the City conducts periodic updates of the provisions of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code (RCMC) to ensure compliance with current laws, changes in local policy, consistency with adopted plans and programs, clarify ambiguities, address changing market conditions, reflect best practices, and to address issues or concerns with current regulations; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 23.325 Overlay Zoning Districts of the Municipal Code, sets forth the allowable land uses and development standards within the Overlay Zoning Districts:
A. The Ordinance would revise Table 23.325-1: Allowed Use Provisions in the Convention Overlay Zoning District to clarify the application of the predominant use standard.
WHEREAS, Chapter 23.716 Landscaping of the Municipal Code, sets forth the development and design standards for landscaping within private property in the City:
A. The Ordinance remove an older version of Figure 23.716.2: Nonpervious Surface Limits in Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Zones.
WHEREAS, Chapter 23.719 Parking & Loading of the Municipal Code, sets forth minimum parking requirements, and development and design standards for parking areas:
A. The Ordinance would revise Table 23.719-1: Required Minimum Vehicle Ratios to revise “commercial schools” to “schools, private and special/studio” to maintain consistency with allowed land uses table in the Zoning Code.
WHEREAS, Chapter 23.734 Accessory Structures of the Municipal Code, sets forth development and design standards for accessory structures:
A. The Ordinance would revise Table 23.734-1: Development Standards for Accessory Structures to clarify setback requirements for accessory structures.
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, Chapter 23.743 Signs of the Municipal Code, sets forth development and design standards for signs:
A. The Ordinance would revise Table 23.743-1: Allowed Permanent On-Site Sign Standards to clarify sign requirements.
B. The Ordinance would revise Section 23.743.050 Prohibited Signs to provide some exceptions for pole signs.
WHEREAS, Chapter 23.1104 Definitions of the Municipal Code, sets forth the definitions for land uses and other terms in the Zoning Code:
A. The Ordinance would revise the definition for “community centers/civic uses” to include “ballrooms.”
WHEREAS, on December 18,, 2023, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing for this Ordinance and considered all oral and written testimony.
Section 2: Findings. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the following findings:
A.CEQA Compliance. CEQA requires analysis of agency approvals of discretionary “projects.” A “project,” under CEQA, is defined as “the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.” (CEQA Guidelines, § 15378.) As reflected in State CEQA Guideline 15061 (b) (3), an activity is not subject to CEQA, “[where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment…” The proposed amendments are not a “project” within the meaning of CEQA because the amendments seek to provide clarification of uses, standards and/or enforcement procedures, address inconsistencies between definitions, delete text that is no longer necessary. Because no expansion of uses or activities is reasonably anticipated, no possibility exists that the ordinance will result in a significant effect on the environment. Thus, the proposed ordinance is not subject to the requirements of CEQA. However, in the event that adoption of the ordinance is considered a CEQA project, it would nonetheless qualify for categorical exemptions as set forth below.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) states that a project is exempt from CEQA “where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.” The approval of the code amendments set forth in the proposed ordinance does not approve any physical development and it would not result in a direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Any specific development projects that may result from these changes will be subject to environmental review. The proposed amendments are consistent with the City’s General Plan. For these reasons, the proposed amendments would not have the potential to result in individually or cumulatively significant effects on the environment and these Municipal Code amendments are exempt from review under CEQA and no further environmental review is necessary.
B.The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan. The attached Municipal Code Amendments (“Amendment”) are consistent with the General Plan. The amendments would address inconsistencies, delete text and graphics that are no longer necessary, and provide clarifying language for implementation.
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 3 of 4 C.The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The amendments would address inconsistencies, delete text and graphics that are no longer necessary, and provide clarifying language for implementation. None of these proposed amendments will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
D. The proposed amendments are internally consistent with other applicable provisions in this Zoning Code. The Amendments have been reviewed for consistency with the entirety of the Municipal Code and are consistent with other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code.
Section 3.Amendments to Title 23 Zoning Code
The City Council hereby adopts the amendments to Title 23 Zoning Code of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code, as shown and incorporated in Exhibit A to this Ordinance.
Section 4.Severability
If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be held unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable.
Section 5. Effective Date
Within fifteen (15) days after adoption, a Summary of this Ordinance shall be published once in the Grapevine Independent, or the Sacramento Bee, a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in Sacramento County and circulated in the City of Rancho Cordova, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption.
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 4 of 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 18th day of December 2023 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
David Sander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 16
Rancho Cordova
Municipal Code
Amendments
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 16
Note to Reader: Only those sections and/or subsections listed within this document are being amended. Unless otherwise indicated, all sections and subsections prior to and after the amended section and/or subsection shall remain, unchanged.
CHAPTER 23.325.020 CONVENTION (CO) OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT.
Table 23.325-1: Allowed Use Provisions in the Convention Overlay Zoning District Land Use Category Convention Overlay
Zoning District
Special Use
Regulations
Residential Uses
Dwelling, Multifamily P1
Home Occupations C RCMC 23.901.030
Live-Work Facility C RCMC 23.901.040
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly Uses
Clubs, Lodges, and Private Meeting Halls P
Community Centers/Civic Uses P
Convention Center P
Indoor Amusement/Entertainment Facility P
Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility AUP
Libraries and Museums P
Outdoor Commercial Recreation AUP
Parks and Public Plazas P
Public Safety Facility P
Religious Institutions C
Schools, Private and Special/Studios3 P
Schools, Public3 P
Theaters and Auditoriums P
Utility, Transportation, and Communication Use Listings Broadcasting and Recording Studios P
Heliports C
Park and Ride Facility P
Telecommunication Facility C RCMC 23.907.020
Transit Stations and Terminals C
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 3 of 16
Land Use Category Convention Overlay
Zoning District
Special Use
Regulations
Utility Facilities and Infrastructure C RCMC 23.907.030 Retail, Service, and Office Uses
Alcoholic Beverage Sales (off-premises consumption)2 C
Art, Antique, Collectable P
Artisan Shop P
Banks and Financial Services P
Bars and Nightclubs C
Brew Pub2 P
Business Support Services P
Child Day Care Facility C
Commercial Marijuana Uses N
Convenience Store P
Drive-In and Drive-Through Sales and Service C RCMC 23.910.030 Home Improvement Supplies AUP
Hotels and Motels P
Hotels and Motels, Extended Stay C
Medical Services, General P
Medical Services, Extended Care P
Medical Services, Hospitals P
Neighborhood Market/Grocery Stores/Supermarket P
Offices, Business and Professional P
Offices, Accessory P
Personal Services P
Restaurants P
Retail, Accessory P
Retail, General P
Tasting Room2 P
Veterinary Facility AUP
Automobile and Vehicle Uses
Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental AUP
Car Washing and Detailing C RMC 23.913.050
Service Stations C
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 4 of 16
Land Use Category Convention Overlay
Zoning District
Special Use
Regulations
Vehicle Services, Minor AUP
Industrial, Manufacturing, and Processing Uses
Brewery, Winery, Distillery2 P
Manufacturing – Small Scale AUP
Printing and Publishing AUP
Research and Development AUP
Warehousing AUP
Notes:
1. For mixed-use zones, the use is permitted in conjunction with the predominant use of the underlying base zoning district. In other words, this use is only allowed as part of an integrated development.
2. Off-premises sale of alcohol is an allowed use where such sales are incidental to an allowed use that provides on-site alcohol consumption (restaurant, brew pub, tasting room, etc.).
3. Dormitories on any parcel that is part of a contiguous campus are permitted as an accessory use to the public or private school.
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 5 of 16
CHAPTER 23.716 LANDSCAPING
23.716.060 Special landscape provisions.
A. Residential Landscape. For single-family and two-family residential zoning districts, at least 25 percent of the lot area shall be pervious surface. Additionally, no more than 40 percent of the front yard area shall be nonpervious surface (e.g. sidewalks, driveway or parking). Driveway pavement shall be five feet from the side property line in order to provide an area of landscaping between adjacent lots. This setback requirement excludes pedestrian walkways from the driveway to the side yard area. Deviations from these standards may be allowed through site plan and architecture review for small-lot single-family developments at the time of master home plan review where these standards cannot be attained due to design. Remaining unpaved portion shall be landscaped, irrigated, and maintained. See Figure 23.716-2 (Nonpervious Surface Limits in Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Zones). Landscaped (pervious) areas shall include a combination of well-maintained ground cover, shrubs, hedges, trees and other pervious landscape materials.
Figure 23.716-2: Nonpervious Surface Limits in Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Zones
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 6 of 16
CHAPTER 23.719.070 VEHICLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
Table 23.719-1: Required Minimum Vehicle Ratios
Land Use Category Vehicle Parking Spaces
Residential Uses
Adult Day Care Home None beyond single-family
Caretaker Housing 1/bedroom
Dwelling, Multifamily
Studio and one-bedroom units 1/unit
Two- and three-bedroom units 2/unit
Four- or more bedroom units 2/unit
+ Guest parking 0.2/unit
Accessory Dwelling Unit11 1/unit
Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit No minimum
Dwelling, Single-Family1,2 2/unit
Dwelling, Two-Family1,2 2/unit
Family Day Care Home, Large 1 additional
Family Day Care Home, Small No minimum
Dormitories 1 space/3 occupants
Group Residential None beyond single-family
Guest House 0 additional
Home Occupations3 1 additional
Live-Work Facility 2/unit (plus 0.25/unit for guests)
Manufactured Home 2/unit
Mobile Home 2/unit
Mobile Home Park 2/unit
Residential Care Home 1 space per employee, plus 1 space/facility vehicle, plus 1 space/8 persons at facility capacity
Senior Independent Living Facility 0.5/unit (plus 0.1 per unit for guests) Agriculture, Resource, and Open Space Uses
Equestrian Facility 1/4 stables
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 7 of 16
Land Use Category Vehicle Parking Spaces
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly Uses
Cemeteries, Mausoleums 1/4 seats5
Clubs, Lodges, and Private Meeting Halls 1/3 seats5
Community Centers/Civic Uses 4/1,000 sf
Community Garden 1/5,000 sf lot area4
Correctional Institution Parking Study Required
Golf Courses6 10/hole
Indoor Amusement/Entertainment Facility 4/1,000 sf
Indoor Fitness and Sports Facility 4/1,000 sf
Libraries and Museums 3/1,000 sf
Outdoor Commercial Recreation 2/1,000 sf7 or 1/4 seats or person capacity, whichever is greater
Parks and Public Plazas (less than 10 acres) No minimum Parks (10 acres or larger) 5% of total site area4,7
Public Safety Facility 4/1,000 sf
Recreational Vehicle Parks 1.5/site
Religious Institutions 0.3/seat
Resource-Related Recreation 1/10,000 sf land area, minimum 4 spaces Schools, Public
Preschool facilities and kindergartens 1/employee plus 1 per classroom, or 1/3 seats in assembly area, whichever is greater
Elementary or middle schools 1/employee plus 1 per classroom, or 1/3 seats in assembly area, whichever is greater
High schools 1/employee plus 1/3 students in 11th and 12th grades; or 1/3 seats in main auditorium
Colleges 1 space/employee + 1 space/2 students; or 1/3 seats in largest assembly area
Schools, Private and Special/Studio 1 space/employee + 1 space/2 students; or 1/3 seats in largest assembly area
Stadiums/Arenas Special review of parking required
Theaters and Auditoriums 0.3/seat10
Utility, Transportation, and Communication Use Listings Airport Parking Study Required
Broadcasting and Recording Studios 3.2/1,000 sf
Heliports 1/landing pad
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 8 of 16
Land Use Category Vehicle Parking Spaces
Park and Ride Facility N/A
Parking Facility N/A
Telecommunication Facility 0.5/1 employee
Utility Facilities and Infrastructure 0.5/1 employee
Retail, Service, and Office Uses
Adult Day Care Facility 1 space/employee, plus 1 space/facility vehicle, plus 1 space/8 persons at facility capacity
Alcoholic Beverage Sales 3.6/1,000 sf
Ambulance Service 3.2/1,000 sf
Animal Sales and Grooming 3.6/1,000 sf
Art, Antique, Collectable 3.6/1,000 sf
Artisan Shops 3.6/1,000 sf
Banks and Financial Services 3/1,000 sf
Bars and Nightclubs 1 per 3 fixed seats, or 1/50 sf of net floor area of assembly space
Bed and Breakfast Inns 1/room
Building Materials Stores and Yards 1/1,000 sf
Business Support Services 3.2/1,000 sf
Call Centers 5/1,000 sf
Child Day Care Facility 1 space/employee, plus 1 space/facility vehicle, plus 1 space/8 persons at facility capacity
Convenience Stores 3.6/1,000 sf
Drive-In and Drive-Through Sales and Service (not
including restaurants)
1 space/2 employees during period of greatest
employment
Equipment Sales and Rental8 1/250 sf interior sales area, plus 1/1,000 sf exterior display area
Furniture, Furnishings, and Appliance Stores 1/1,000 sf Garden Center/Plant Nursery 1/300 sf retail sales area, plus 1/1,000 sf exterior display area
Grocery Stores/Supermarket 3.5/1,000 sf
Home Improvement Supplies 2/1,000 sf
Hotels and Motels 1/room
Kennels, Commercial 3.2/1,000 sf
Maintenance and Repair, Small Equipment 3.2/1,000 sf
Medical Services, General 3.9/1,000 sf
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 9 of 16
Land Use Category Vehicle Parking Spaces
Medical Services, Extended Care 1 space/employee, plus 1 space/facility vehicle, plus 1 space/8 persons at facility capacity
Medical Services, Hospitals9 2/bed or 2/1,000 sf
Mortuaries and Funeral Homes5 1/3 seats
Neighborhood Market 3/1,000 sf
Offices, Business and Professional12 3/1,000 sf
Offices, Accessory 3/1,000 sf
Personal Services 3.2/1,000 sf
Residential Care Facility 1 space/employee, plus 1 space/facility vehicle, plus 1 space/8 persons at facility capacity
Restaurants 1/3 seats
Retail, Accessory 3.6/1,000 sf
Retail, General 3.6/1,000 sf
Retail, Warehouse Club 3.6/1,000 sf
Veterinary Facility 3.2/1,000 sf
Regional Shopping Center 5.5/1,000 sf
Tasting Room13 1 space/300 sf
Vehicle Uses
Vehicle Dismantling 3 spaces, plus 1 space/employee
Vehicle Sales and Rental 2.5/1,000 sf, plus 1 space per rental vehicle Vehicle Sales, Wholesale 1/1,000 sf, minimum 2 spaces
Vehicle Storage 1/2,000 sf, plus 1 space/company-operated vehicle Vehicle Parts Sales 3.6/1,000 sf
Car Washing and Detailing 3 spaces minimum + 2 per bay
Service Stations 3 spaces minimum + 2 per bay
Vehicle Services 2 per service bay
Industrial, Manufacturing, and Processing Uses
Agricultural Products Processing 1.6/1,000 sf, plus 1 space/company-operated vehicle Manufacturing14 1/1,000 sf, plus 1 space/company-operated vehicle Office (as accessory to a use in this category) 2.7/1,000 sf Printing and Publishing 1/1,000 sf, plus 1 space/company-operated vehicle Recycling Facility, Processing 1/200 sf office space, plus 1 space/employee Recycling Facility, Scrap and Dismantling Facility 1/1,000 sf, plus 1 space/company-operated vehicle Research and Development 2.5/1,000 sf
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 10 of 16
Land Use Category Vehicle Parking Spaces
Storage, Personal Storage Facility15 1/2,000 sf, plus 1 space/company-operated vehicle Storage, Warehouse 0.5/1,000 sf, plus 1 space/company-operated vehicle Wholesaling and Distribution 0.5/1,000 sf, plus 1 space/company-operated vehicle Special Regulated Uses
Card Rooms 1/2 seats in play area
Check Cashing Businesses 3.6/1,000 sf
Massage Parlor 3.2/1,000 sf
Pawnshops 3.6/1,000 sf
Recycling Facility, Collection Facility 3.2/1,000 sf
Sexually Oriented Businesses 1/3 fixed seats or 4/1,000 sf, whichever is greater Smoke Shops 3.6/1,000 sf
Tattoo Parlors 3.6/1,000 sf
Thrift Store 3.6/1,000 sf
Notes:
1. See RCMC 23.719.130.
2. Parking may be reduced to one space per unit for residential units for low or moderate income subsidized homeownership units.
3. Additional parking for home occupations is not required to be covered or enclosed and may occur within the front or street-side yard setback on a driveway or other paved surface.
4. On-street parking space adjacent to park property may be credited toward parking requirement.
5. Applies to seating in main or largest assembly area only.
6. Clubhouse calculated as retail and provided in addition to required spaces for golf courses. Additional parking not required for accessory uses (e.g., driving ranges, putting greens, maintenance shops, equipment storage).
7. Parking based on area of active recreation only.
8. Indoor and outdoor merchandise display areas.
9. Calculate associated medical office facilities as medical services, general.
10. If fixed seating is not used, then parking shall be provided at a ratio of one space/30 square feet of floor area in the assembly hall(s).
11. Parking requirements shall be in compliance with Government Code Section 65852.2. No additional parking shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit if: the unit is located within one-half mile of public transit, the unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant district; the unit is part of the existing primary residence or an existing accessory structure; or there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the unit.
12. Office, business and professional shall be allowed up to 200 percent of minimum required parking by right with no additional approvals.
13. Required parking spaces for adjacent uses can be counted towards the required parking for a tasting room as long as the hours of operations for the use do not overlap with the tasting room hours.
14. Manufacturing shall be allowed up to 300 percent of minimum required parking by right with no additional approvals.
15. Personal storage facilities with internally accessed storage units (units not directly accessed from internal drive aisles) shall provide loading zones at each building with number of loading spaces determined during project review. [Ord. 1-2022 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 3-2019 § 5 (Exh. A); Ord. 4-2018 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 4-2017 § 3 (Exh. B); Ord. 12-2011 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 27-2008 § 1 (Exh. A § 4.7.080). Formerly 23.719.080].
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 11 of 16
CHAPTER 23.734 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.
Table 23.734-1: Development Standards for Accessory Structures Accessory Use Type Interior Property Line Rear Property Line
Zoning
Certification
Square footage less
than 120 and less than
8 feet in height
overall
3 feet
The structure shall not be placed
closer to the front lot line than the
farthest back front wall of the
principal building.
3 feet NoGeneral
Accessory
Structure
Square footage 120
and more and/or more
than 8 feet in height
overall
For structures 8 feet in height, the
minimum setback from the rear and
side property lines is 5 feet.
Up to every ½ foot increase in height
over 8 feet, the setback shall increase
by another ½ feet. (For example: 8
feet tall= 5-foot setback; 8.5 feet
tall=5.5-foot setback; 8.75 feet tall =
6-foot setback…)
. For structures
8 feet in height,
the minimum
setback from the
rear and side
property lines is
5 feet.
Up to every ½
foot increase in
height over 8
feet, the setback
shall increase by
another ½ feet.
(For example: 8
feet tall= 5-foot
setback; 8.5 feet
tall=5.5-foot
setback; 8.75
feet tall = 6-foot
setback…)
Yes
Swimming Pools, Spas, and Pool
Equipment (Setbacks shall be from the
right-of-way or property line to the water
line or pool equipment)
3 feet 3 feet Yes
Landscape
Features
Square footage less
than 120 and less than
8 feet in height
3 feet 3 feet No
Pad, Less Than 8
Inches Tall
None None No
Pad, Driveway 5 feet from the property line None No
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 12 of 16
CHAPTER 23.743.050 PROHIBITED SIGNS
The signs listed in this section are inconsistent with the purposes and standards of this chapter as described below and as such are prohibited in all zoning districts, unless specifically authorized by another provision of this chapter:
A. Moving or rotating signs, except barber poles at barbershops.
B. Signs with flashing, moving, or animated illumination (e.g., flashing signs), except barber poles at barbershops and electronic readerboards. Sign content must remain static and not change message or appearance and may only change message or appearance after a minimum period of 60 minutes.
C. Any sign displaying any obscene matter.
D. Signs located within the clear vision triangle as defined by Improvement Standard 4-18, Visibility Restrictions at Driveways and Intersections, and any future updates thereto.
E. Signs which imitate or resemble official traffic warning devices or signs, that by color, location, content, or lighting may confuse or disorient vehicular or pedestrian traffic, excluding on-site directional signs as specified in RCMC 23.743.040 (Sign exemptions).
F. Portable signs (e.g., A-frame sign), except for real estate signs as provided in RCMC 23.743.085 (Real estate sign standards) or as permitted as a temporary sign with a temporary use permit as provided in RCMC 23.743.070 (Allowed temporary on-site sign standards).
G. Temporary signs, except when a valid temporary use permit has been issued or as otherwise exempted in RCMC
23.743.030 (Permit requirements for signs).
H. Inflatable or lighter-than-air devices (e.g., balloon sign) of any kind when attached or secured from the ground or to any object on the ground, except for residential real estate as part of zoning certification and under the standards of RCMC 23.743.085 (Real estate sign standards) or except when a valid temporary use permit has been issued as provided for in RCMC 23.743.070 (Allowed temporary on-site sign standards).
I. Portable readerboard advertising devices which are readerboard signs affixed with wheels so as to make them moveable signs.
J. Signs projecting over roofs and roof signs, except where specifically provided for under the provisions of signs attached to buildings.
K. Signs projecting from buildings, except where provided for in a special sign district ordinance or otherwise specifically provided for.
L. Banners, except when allowed through a temporary use permit or a grand opening event as described in RCMC
23.743.070 (Allowed temporary on-site sign standards).
M. Pennant flags and string pennant flags.
N. Wind signs.
O. Vehicle signs (large) as defined in this chapter.
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 13 of 16
P. Video display signs, except as provided for in RCMC 23.743.065 (Standards for electronic message signs).
Q. Reserved.
R. Digital freeway signs, except as provided for in RCMC 23.743.150 (Digital freeway signs overlay).
S. Electronic message and graphic display signs, except as provided for in RCMC 23.743.065 (Standards for electronic message signs).
T. Signs with fluctuating illumination, including any changes in light intensity or use of intermittent, strobe, or moving light that does not fall under the definition of another sign type (e.g., video display sign), unless approved under RCMC 23.743.065.
U. Any other advertising device attached to a building, fence, pole, or vehicle on display not specifically mentioned, unless otherwise provided for in this code.
V. Any sign in the public right-of-way unless otherwise permitted in this code or by the public works director (e.g., encroachment permit).
W. Signs on portions of a structure exempted from the height requirements as described in RCMC 23.701.040 (Height exceptions) when said features exceed the height limit of the underlying zone.
X. Pylon signs.
Y. Pole signs except for signs as described RCMC 23.743.040.A.2.g (on-site directional signs) and 23.743.040.A.2.i (menu/order board signs). [Ord. 4-2018 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 4-2017 § 3 (Exh. B); Ord. 12-2014 § 3 (Exh. C); Ord. 16-2012 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 12-2011 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 27-2008 § 1 (Exh. A § 4.15.050)].
CHAPTER 23.743.060 ALLOWED PERMANENT ON-SITE SIGN STANDARDS.
Table 23.743-1: Allowed Permanent On-Site Sign Standards Sign Type
Maximum
Number
Permitted
Maximum
Area3
Maximum
Height
Illumination
Allowed
Minimum
Setback
from
ROW
Other
Standards
Home Occupations
Building-Attached
Sign All types 1 per home
occupation 4 sf
Not
extending
above the
roofline of
the
building
No
Agricultural Uses
Freestanding Sign Monument
only
1 per
establishment
Parcels < 5
ac, 16 sf;
Parcels > 5
ac, 24 sf
6 ft No 10 ft
Permanent Subdivision Identification Signs
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 14 of 16
Sign Type
Maximum
Number
Permitted
Maximum
Area3
Maximum
Height
Illumination
Allowed
Minimum
Setback
from
ROW
Other
Standards
Monument or
on
fence/wall,
not in ROW
1 per entrance 24 sf 6 ft Yes 10 ft
Freestanding Sign
Monument,
w/in ROW 1 per entrance 24 sf 6 ft No 1
Multifamily Dwellings and Complexes
Building-Attached
Signs All types 1 per entrance 24 sf
Not
extending
above the
roofline of
the
building
Yes
Freestanding Sign Monument
only 1 per entrance 24 sf 6 ft Yes 10 ft
Commercial Uses
Building-Attached
Signs All types No maximum
< 50 ft from
ROW: 2:1;
≥ 50 ft from
ROW: 3:1
Not
extending
above the
roofline of
the
building
Yes
Freestanding
Signs for
Individual
Buildings Not
Part of an
Integrated
Development
Monument
only
1 per project
entrance 50 sf 10 ft Yes 10 ft
Freestanding
Signs for
Integrated
Developments
Monument
only
1 per project
entrance 150 sf/sign 10 ft Yes 10 ft
Office Uses
Building-Attached
Signs All types
1 per
establishment
per building
frontage
1:1
Not
extending
above the
roofline of
the
building
Yes
Freestanding
Signs for
Individual
Buildings Not
Monument
only
1 per project
entrance 25 sf 10 ft Yes 10 ft
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 15 of 16
Sign Type
Maximum
Number
Permitted
Maximum
Area3
Maximum
Height
Illumination
Allowed
Minimum
Setback
from
ROW
Other
Standards
Part of an
Integrated
Development
Freestanding
Signs for
Integrated
Developments
Monument
only
1 per project
entrance 50 sf/sign 10 ft Yes 10 ft
Industrial Uses
Building-Attached
Signs All types No maximum
< 50 ft from
ROW: 2:1;
≥ 50 ft from
ROW: 3:1
Not
extending
above the
roofline of
the
building
Yes
Freestanding
Signs for
Individual
Buildings Not
Part of an
Integrated
Development
Monument
only 1 per parcel 40 sf 10 ft Yes 10 ft
Freestanding
Signs for
Integrated
Developments
Monument
only
1 per project
entrance 40 sf/sign 10 ft Yes 10 ft
Automotive Service Stations2
Building-Attached
Signs All types No maximum 125 sf all
signs
Not
extending
above the
roofline of
the
building
Yes
Freestanding
Signs
Monument
only 2
36 sf for
freestanding
signs. 52 sf
including
pricing
signs
10 ft Yes 10 ft
Institutional and Public/Quasi-Public Uses
Building-Attached
Signs All types 1 24 sf
Not
extending
above the
roofline of
the
building
Yes
ITEM 9.3. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance
Ordinance No. XX-2023 Page 16 of 16
Sign Type
Maximum
Number
Permitted
Maximum
Area3
Maximum
Height
Illumination
Allowed
Minimum
Setback
from
ROW
Other
Standards
Freestanding
Signs
Monument
only
1 per main
entrance 24 sf 6 ft Yes 10 ft
Public Assembly Uses
Building-Attached
Signs All Types 1 36 sf total
Not
extending
above the
roofline of
the
building
Yes
Freestanding Sign Monument
only 1
24 sf for
freestanding
sign
6 ft Yes 10 ft
Notes:
1. Within median island, sign must be set back three feet from sides and 12 feet from ends.
2. Excludes the gas pricing component of the subject sign, which is regulated by state law.
3. Maximum total sign area may be exceeded with the approval of a unified sign program. Signage may also be permitted to exceed the total signage allowance based on primary site or building frontage by 25 percent with the approval of a unified sign program.
[Ord. 4-2017 § 3 (Exh. B); Ord. 12-2014 § 3 (Exh. C); Ord. 16-2012 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 12-2011 § 3 (Exh. A); Ord. 27-2008 § 1 (Exh. A § 4.15.060)].
CHAPTER 23.1104.040 LAND USE DEFINITIONS.
“Community centers/civic uses” means multipurpose meeting facilities, recreational facilities, and ballrooms typically consisting of one or more meeting or multipurpose rooms, kitchens and/or outdoor barbecue facilities that are available for use by various groups for such activities as meetings, parties, receptions, dances, etc.
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 3
ITEM 9.4.
DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Michelle Mingay, Senior Finance Analyst
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS RELATED TO, AND ACCEPTING, THE FISCAL
YEAR 2022-23 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FOR
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1600 DEVELOPMENT FEES
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would approve the annual Development Impact Fee Report prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and ensures the City remains in compliance with AB 1600 reporting requirements.
BACKGROUND
State Law (California Government Code Section 66006) requires each local agency that imposes Assembly Bill No. 1600 (AB 1600) development impact fees to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees. AB 1600's legal requirements stipulate that the fees imposed on new development have the proper nexus to any project on which they are imposed. In addition, AB 1600 imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected. The fees, for accounting purposes, must be segregated from the general fund or the City and from other funds or accounts containing fees collected for other improvements. Interest on each development fee fund or account must be credited to that fund or account and used only for the purposes for which the fees were collected.
California Government Code Section 66006(b)(1) requires that for each separate account or fund, the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of the fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:
• A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund • The amount of the fee
• The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund • The amount of the fees collected and interest earned
• An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 3
• An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement • A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan • The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded
California Government Code Section 66001(d)(1) requires the local agency make all of following findings every fifth year with respect to that portion of the account remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted:
• Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put
• Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which it is charged
• Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements
• Designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund
• In any action imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local agency, the local agency shall determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed
If the agency no longer needs the funds for the purposes collected, or if the agency fails to make required finding, or perform certain administrative tasks prescribed by AB 1600, the agency may be required to refund, on a prorated basis to owners of the properties upon which the fees for the improvement were imposed, the monies collected for that project and any interest earned on those funds.
The FY 2022-23 Development Impact Fee Report (the “Report”) has been prepared to meet the annual reporting requirements only since the required five-year findings were made in 2019, with the adoption of Resolution No. 133-2019, and therefore will not be required to be made again until 2024. It should also be noted that the Report includes fees that were in place on June 30, 2023, and does not necessarily represent current fee levels since any fee adjustments after June 30 will be captured in the FY 2023-24 Development Impact Fee Report.
The report must be reviewed by the City Council at a regularly scheduled public meeting, not less than 15 days after the information is made available to the public. In addition, notice of the time and place of the meeting shall be mailed at least 15 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the local agency for such a mailed notice, of which the City has none. The report was posted to the City’s website and available for public review on December 1, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 3
Ongoing compliance with AB 1600 reporting requirements will allow the City to continue to collect fees from developers to ensure that new development is providing new infrastructure or funds to ensure that their impact upon the City is funded by the development, not by existing residents.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - FY 2022-23 Development Impact Fee Report
ITEM 9.4. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS RELATED TO, AND ACCEPTING, THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1600 DEVELOPMENT FEES
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova imposes fees to mitigate the impacts of development, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq.; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 66006(a), the City has established and maintained separate funds for each development impact fee in a manner to avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the City, except for temporary investments, and has expended those fees solely for the purpose for which the fees were collected; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 66006(b)(1) requires cities to prepare and make available to the public a report describing each development impact fee and providing details related to its use within one hundred eighty (180) days after the last day of each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Report, for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2023, (the “Report”), attached hereto as Exhibit A, provides a description of each fee, its amount, and various information required by Government Code section 66006(b)(1) to be reported on an annual basis; and
WHEREAS, the Report provides information required by Government Code sections 66001 and 66006 for the following approved development impact fees:
•Community Facilities Fee Program: On April 1, 2013, the City Council approved Resolution No. 38-2013 updating the Community Facilities Fee Program, which was originally established in 2004 and updated in 2005, to fund a portion of the future municipal facilities required to serve an increased City population due to anticipated future development; and
•Sunrise Douglas Community Plan Development Impact Fees: On June 21, 2004, the City Council approved Resolution No. 79-2004 establishing the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan Development Impact Fee Program to finance the required roadways, supplemental offsite water, interim sewer, park and library facilities necessary to service development in the Sunridge Specific Plan, as well as defray the cost of routine administration of the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan Development Fee Program; and •Transportation Development Impact Fee Program: On December 19, 2005, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 33-2005 establishing a Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Program to finance transportation improvements necessary to offset the impact on the City’s transportation system of new development in the City, to ensure that adequate funding is provided for improvements required to meet the demands of such new development, and to fund administration of the Fee Program. An update to the TDIF was approved by the City Council on February 7, 2022, with the approval of Resolution No. 15-2022; and
ITEM 9.4. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 3 •Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program: On October 5, 2020, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 15-2020 establishing the Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program to finance major storm drainage improvements necessary to offset the impacts of new development in the City, to ensure that adequate funding is provided for improvements required to meet the demands of such new development, and to fund administration of the Fee Program; and
•Measure A – Transportation Improvement Impact Fee: On January 20, 2009, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 1-2009 establishing development impact fees for Measure A Transportation Improvements. The impact fees were established to provide funding for public facilities needed to serve the City, which facilities are described in the Measure A expenditure plan and the Measure A nexus study. The Measure A impact fee is collected by the City and remitted to the Sacramento Transportation Authority, which administers the impact fee program; and
•Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) Development Impact Fee Program: On April 2, 2018, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 5-2018 establishing the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) Development Impact Fee Program, as outlined in the Sacramento County Roadway and Transit Capital Improvement Programs adopted by the City Council with Resolution No. 38-2018. The City collects and remits the impact fee to SacRT who is then responsible for programing and expending the funds on an annual basis; and
•Housing Trust Development Impact Fee: On December 1, 2003, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 26-2003 continuing the Housing Trust Development Impact Fee in effect when the City incorporated, which is to be used to finance municipal public facilities to reduce the impacts caused by future developments in the Rancho Cordova area on the housing stock, including but not limited to very low income housing facilities.
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 66006(b)(2) requires that the governing body of the City review the information made available to the public at a regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after the information is made available to the public; and
WHEREAS, the Report was made available to the public on the City's website on December 1, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on December 18, 2023, the City Council reviewed the report and approved it pursuant to Government Code Sections 66001 and 66006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA:
Section 1. The City Council does hereby find and determine that the foregoing recitals and determinations are true and correct.
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the Report and finds that it complies with California Government Code Section 66006(b), setting the requirements for fiscal year reporting for development impact fees. The City Council finds that the Report provides the following required information:
1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund (Report pg. 4-6);
2. The amount of the fee (Report pg. 6-9);
3. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund (Report pg. 10-12);
4. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned (Report pg. 13-24);
ITEM 9.4. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 3 of 3
5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees (Report pg. 28-30);
6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement (Report pg. 28-30);
7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan (Report pg. 25-26);
8. The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded (Report pg. 27).
Section 3. The City Council hereby finds that all reportable fees, collections and expenditures have been received, deposited, invested and expended in compliance with the relevant sections of the California Government Code and all other applicable laws for Fiscal Year 2022-23.
Section 4. The City Council hereby finds that no refunds and allocations of reportable fees, as required by California Government Code Section 66001, are deemed payable at this time.
Section 5. The City Council hereby finds the City is in compliance with California Government Code section 66000, et seq., relative to receipt, deposit, investment, expenditure or refund of reportable fees received and expended relative to the individual impact fee programs in place for new development in Fiscal Year 2022-23.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 18th day of December 2023 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
David Sander, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
City of Rancho Cordova
Development
Impact Fee
Report
Fiscal Year Ending
June 30, 2023
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Table of Contents
Legal Requirement ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 1 Description of Development Impact Fee(s) ................................ ................................ ................ 4 Current Fee Schedule ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 6 Development Impact Fee Reports
Financial Summary Report - Current Year Activity ........................................................... 10
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Change in Fund Balance Community Facility Fee (CFF) Impact Fee Program
Community Facilities .......................................................................................................... 13 Library ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Sunrise Douglas (SD) Impact Fee Program
Interim Sewer ........................................................................................................................ 15 Supplemental Offsite Water ........................................................................................... 16 Roadway ................................................................................................................................. 17 Program Administration ................................................................................................... 18 Traffic Mitigation Impact Fee Program ........................................................................... 19 Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program
Drainage Facilities ............................................................................................................. 20 Administration ..................................................................................................................... 21 Measure A Transportation Improvement Fee Program ................................................... 22 Sacramento Regional Transit Fee Program ………………………………………………………………..23 Housing Trust Development Impact Fee Program ........................................................... 24 Notes to the Annual Development Impact Fee Report ................................ ......................... 25 Development Fee Project Identification ................................ ................................ ..................... 28 Resolution No. XX-2023 ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 31 ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Legal Requirements
A. REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
State law (California Governm ent Code Section 66006) requires each local agency that imposes AB 1600 development i mpact fees to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees. Within the AB1600 legal requirements, it stipulates that fees imposed on new develo pment have the proper nexus to any project on which they are imposed. In addition, AB1600 imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected. The fees, for accounting purposes, must be segregated f rom the general funds of the City and from other funds or accounts containing fees colle cted for other improvements. Interest on each development fee fund or account must be credited to that fund or account and used only for the purposes for which the fees were collected.
Current California Government Code Section 66006(b) requires that fo r each separate fu nd the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:
• A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. • The amount of the fee.
• The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund. • The amount of the fees collected and interest earned. • An identification of each public improvement on w hich fees were expen ded and the amount of expenditures on each improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees. • An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement. • A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public i mprovement on which th e transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan. • The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds b eing collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvem ents, and the amoun t of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded.
Ca
lifornia Government Code Section 66001(d) requires the local agency make all of following findings every fifth year with re spect to that portion of the account remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted:
• Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
• Demonstrate a reasonable r elationship between the fee and purpose for which it is charged.
• Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements.
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
• Designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expect ed to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
• In any action imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local agency, the local agency shall determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the f ee and the cost of t he public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
B. ADDITIONAL NOTES
The State of California Government Code Section 66002 requires local agencies that have developed a fee p rogram to adopt a Cap ital Improvement Plan (CIP) indicating the approximate location, size and timing of projects, plus an estimate for the cost of all facilities or improvements to be financed by fees. A formal CIP is recommended, at a minimum, as a five-year plan. The City annually produces a five- year CIP which provides program summary information for the City’s various capital improvement funding programs, as well as project summary information (revenue, expenditures and project schedule) for the specif ic projects selected for implementation during the CIP period. The CIP describes the fi ve-year plan for allocating funds from the Impact Fee Programs, Measure A Transportation Sales Tax, State and Federal Grants, Gas Tax, Roadway Funds, Supplemental Trans portation Fees, Storm Water Utility Tax and Transit Related Service Area Tax. A copy of the City’s most recent CIP was adopted as part of the biennial budget document and can be found under the Finance Department page on the City’s website at www.cityofranchocordova.org.
Th
e CIP relates the City’s annual capi tal expenditures to a long -range plan for public improvements. By relating the plan for public improvements to the City’s capacity for funding, and s cheduling expenditur es over a period of years, the CIP helps maximize the funds available. This type of fiscal management is important during periods where budgetary demands exceeding financial resources.
C. ESTABLISHING A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FEE AND THE PURPOSE
FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED
The Development Impact Fee Program has been in effect in Rancho Cordova since incorporation in fiscal year 2003/04. The Development Impact Fee Program consists of multiple components which were individually adop ted by the City Council. The program sets forth the relationship between contemplated fu ture development, facilities needed to serve future development and the estimated costs of those improvements based on the current General Plan for build-out.
The
City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects are financed, in part, by the development impact fees outlined in the description of the development impact fees on the following pages. The City’s CIP provide infrastructure to the residents and businesses in R ancho Cordova in ord er to keep pace with ongoing development in, and adjacent to, the community. Estimated project costs, and the summary of fee apportionment to each ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
development fee type, are detailed within the adopted Nexus Studies establishing the individual Development Impact Fee program(s) and are on file with the City Clerk’s Office.
Infor
mation on projects in the Development Impact Fee Program(s) can be found on pages 28-30. The information in these tables include: Current Projects, Project Phase , Construction Estimated Start Date, Construction Estimated Completion Date, Estimated P roject Cost and Development Fee information including Funding to Date, Budget to Date and % of Total Project Cost.
D. FUNDING OF INFRASTRUCTURE
The 20 20/21 - 2024/25 Capital Improvement Plan ( CIP) identifies all funding sources and amounts for individual proj ects through 20 24/25. The CIP is updated annually to reflect the current infrastructure needs of the City. As a CIP project is identified, the project is evaluated to determine the portio n of the project that will service existing residents and businesses versus new development.
On
ce the determination of use is made, the percentage of use attributable to new development is then funded by the appropriate development fe e, based on the type o f project. The percentage of use associated with existing resident s or businesses are funded from other appropriate sources as identified on each individual project sheet in the CIP. All future planned infrastructure needs are outline d in the Development Impact Fee Program(s).
The funding and commencement dates for proje cts are adjusted, a s needed, to reflect the needs of the community.
E. CURRENT PROJECTS
Construction is currently underway on the following projects:
• 80040 – Chrysanthy Blvd Phase II
• 80075 – Rancho Cordova City Hall – Suite 220 Renovation ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description of Development Impact Fee(s)
Community Facilities Fee (CFF) Program – This program was established by the City to cover the costs of municipal facilities required to serve an increased population as a result of new development. The city has identified these facilities to inc lude a city hall, a police station, a community center, a city c orporation yard, a city museum, a parking structure, library facilities and ongoing administration o f the CFF program. The fee program was updated in April 2013 and combined fee components from the City’s 2004 an d 2005 Fee Studies into a single fee category while continuing to report the library fee separately since the City is holding these funds on behalf of the Sacramento Public Library Authority.
Community Facilities Impact Fe e – To provide for new development ’s share of the cost of municipal facilities, furnishing and equipment required to service the City.
Library Impact Fee – To provide for n ew development’s share of the cost of a library building, furnishings, equipment, books, financing, and the purchase of land.
Sunrise Douglas (SD) Impact Fee Program – These specific plan development impact fees are imposed on development in the Sunridge Specific Plan (SRSP), which is part of the Sunrise Douglas Communit y Plan (SDCP) development area. It includes addit ional fees for fee program updates, interim sewer facilities, park development improvements, supplemental offsite water facilities, roadways improvements, transit shuttl es, and administration of the fee program. These funds can only b e spent on facilities i n the SDCP Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to mitigate impact as a result of development in the SDCP area.
SD Interim Sewer Impa ct Fee – To provide funding for the construction of int erim sewer facilities to serve the SRSP area. Upon application by the property owner or his authorized agent, the City may authori ze the construction of any interim sew er facilities, or portions thereof, as designate d in the SDCP Impact Fee Program in lieu of all, or a portion of, the required interim sewer development fee.
SD Supplemental Offs ite Water Impact Fee – To provide funding for the construction of offsite water improvements to serve the SRSP area. Upon application by the property owner or his authorized agent , th e City may au thorize the construction of any offsite water facilities, or portions thereof, as designated in the SDCP Impact Fee Program in lieu of all, or a portion of, the supplemental offsite water development fee.
SD Roadway Impact Fee – To p rovide fu nding to co nstruct roads, intersec tions, and other roadway im provements in the SD CP CIP needed to mitigate the impacts of new development within the SRSP area. Upon application by the property owner or his authorized agent, the City may authorize th e construction of any roadway facilities, or portions thereof, in order of priority as designated on the priority list in the SD Impact Fee Program. The d eveloper will then either be reimbursed for these costs from fees collected from other developers in the S DCP area, only t o the extent the fu nds are available, or a credit for such in lieu construction will be provide to the property owner to be used within the SDCP area.
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
SD Administr ation Impact Fee – To provide funding for the administrative duties associated with the SD Impact Fee program.
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fee – This development impact fee is a citywide fee imposed on new development in the City to cover the fair share cost of traffic impacts resulting from new development, including program administration. The funds collected will be used for construction of the transportation improvemen ts listed in the Tra nsportation Capi tal Improvement Plan (CIP) Development Impact Fee Program.
Upon application by the property owner or his authorized a gent, the City may authorize the construction of any transportation facilities, or portions thereof, in order of priority as designated on the priority list for the transportation impact fee program. The developer will then either be reimbursed for these costs from fees collected from other developers, only to the extent the funds are available, or a credit in lieu of all, or a portion of t he required transportation impact fee.
Storm Drai nage Impact Fe e Program – This develop ment impact fe e is a citywide fee imposed o n new deve lopment in the City to cover the fair share cost of major drainage facilities, including program administration.
Storm Drainage – Facilitie s Fee – All development that contributes to stormwater runoff to the public drainage system is required to pay a drainage impact fee to offset the cost of trunk and regional drainage facilities necessitated b y development. Upon application by the property owner or his authorized agent, the City may authorize the co nstruction of any major drainage facility designated in the Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program. If the approved facility is sized to serve mor e than just the property owners project or if the facility will serve a regional purpose, t he developer may qualify for fee credits. The credits are not intended to fully compensate developers for the drainage facilities.
Storm Drainage – Adm
inistration Fee – To provide funding for the administrative duties associated with the Storm Drainage Impact Fee program.
Measure A – Transportation Improvement Impact Fee – A impact fee established to provide funding for public facilitie s to serve the City, which facilities are described in t he Measure A expenditure plan and the Measure A nexus study. The Measure A impact fee is collected by the City and re mitted to the Sacramento Transportation Authority, which administers the countywide Measure A program.
Sacramento Re gional Transit (SacRT) Impact Fee – A impact fee established to provide funding for public facilities to serve the City, which facilities are descr ibed in the Sacramento Regional Transit expenditure plan and nexus study. The SacRT impact fee is collected by the City and remitted to the Sacramento Regional Transit District, which administer s the program.
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Housing Trust Development Impact Fee – A non-residential impact fee used to offset some of the increased burden of ne ed for very low-income housing, created by the construct ion of non-residential uses, which employ a significant number of low wage earners.
Current Fee Schedule
The Development Fee program is reviewed periodically to ensure the Develop ment Impact Fee Pr ogram is accounting f or all planned future development. The updated Development Impact Fee Program information is then used to determine the amount of fees available for the funding of the proposed capital improvement projects identified in t he development of the five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
Single Family Multi-Family Office Commercial
Per Unit Per Unit Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft
Sunrise Douglas (SD) Impact Fees:
Interim Sewer 792.78 594.58 0.16 0.08
Park* 12,070.13 9,507.44 n/a n/a
Supp. Offsite Water 1,149.07 861.51 0.36 0.42
Traffic Mitigation 8,843.10 4,954.85 10.02 14.51 Program Admin 404.44 240.41 0.37 0.56
Total Fees $23,259.52 $16,158.79 $10.91 $15.57
* Park Development Fees vary by Development Agreement
Residential Non-Residential
Fee Category
SUNRISE DOUGLAS (SD) IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2023
Single Family Multi-Family Office Commercial Industrial Per Unit Per Unit Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft
Community Facility Impact Fees:
Community Facilities 3,967.14 3,099.76 0.99 0.60 0.25 L
ibrary 812.54 635.42 n/a n/a n/a
Total Fees $4,779.68 $3,735.18 $0.99 $0.60 $0.25
COMMUNITY FACILITIES IMPACT FEES
Residential Non-Residential
Fee Category
at June 30, 2023
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Residential [1]
Single Family > 1,200 SF 12,265.40 20,263.15
Single Family < 1,200 SF 8,189.58 17,831.57
Multi-Fam
ily 6,502.13 11,549.73
Age Restricted - Single Family 3,679.51 6,079.47 Age Restricted - Multi Family 3,189.40 5,268.95 Non-Residential
Commercial [2]
11.80 15.00
Office [2]
11.26 11.52
Industrial [2]
5.79 5.93
Miscellaneous
Church [2]
4.17 6.89
Gasoline/Service Station [3]
13,001.09 21,479.47
Hotel/Motel [4]
3,801.78 6,281.84
Mobile Home Park [5]
5,642.06 9,321.58
1 - Per Dwelling Unit 4 - Per Room
2 - Per Square Foot 5 - Per Unit
3 - Per Position
at June 30, 2023
Infill Area Growth Area
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees
Residential Office Hotel
Research &
Development Commercial Manufacturing Warehouse
Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Very Low Income Housing Impact Fee
Impact Fee n/a 0.97 0.92 0.82 0.77 0.61 0.26
Program Admin n/a
Non-Residential
Fee Category
Between $30 and $100 as determined by Plan Review
VERY LOW INCOME HOUSING IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2023
Single
Family
Multi-
Family Commercial Bus & Prof Industrial Office
Per Unit Per Unit Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) Fee
Transit Development 175.00 356.00 0.77 0.70 0.16 0.45
Program Admin 3.50 7.12 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
Total Fees $178.50 $363.12 $0.79 $0.71 $0.16 $0.46
SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT (SacRT) IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2023
Residential Non-Residential
Fee Category
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Percent
Impervious
Construction
Cost/Acre
Administrative
Cost/Acre
Total
Fee/Acre
Commercial/Office/Retail1
70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
Industrial 70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
High Density Residential
RMH 75% 26,390.47$ 1,056.21$ 27,447$
RD-302
70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
RD-25 70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
RD-20 70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
Medium Density Residential
RD-15 70% 24,629.42$ 985.72$ 25,615$
RD-10 60% 21,111.54$ 844.76$ 21,956$
RD-7 50% 17,592.60$ 703.79$ 18,296$
RD-6 40% 14,074.71$ 562.82$ 14,638$
Low Density Residential
RD-5 40% 14,074.71$ 562.82$ 14,638$
RD-4 38% 13,370.92$ 534.42$ 13,905$
RD-3 33% 11,436.29$ 456.57$ 11,893$
RD-2 28% 9,676.30$ 386.08$ 10,062$
RD-1 25% 8,796.82$ 352.42$ 9,149$
AR-1 17% 5,981.67$ 238.80$ 6,220$
AR-2 10% 3,517.89$ 140.97$ 3,659$
AR-5 10% 3,517.89$ 140.97$ 3,659$
AR-10 10% 3,517.89$ 140.97$ 3,659$
Mowed grass with graded and piped to drain 20% 7,036.83$ 281.94$ 7,319$ Mowed grass with no piped drainage 10% 3,517.89$ 140.97$ 3,659$ Impervious Area Park2
75% 26,390.47$ 1,056.21$ 27,447$
School Campus with detention 25% 8,796.82$ 352.42$ 9,149$ School Campus 50% 17,592.60$ 703.79$ 18,296$
STORM DRAINAGE IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2023
Land Use
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Land Use Per Fee
Single Family Residential Unit 1,429$
Single Family Residential, Senior Unit 1,144
Multi-Fam
ily Residential Unit 1,000
Multi-Family Residential, Senior Unit 856
Office Use 1,000 Sq. Ft 1,717
Retail Use 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,146
Industrial Use 1,000 Sq. Ft 1,144
Hotel/Motel Sleeping Room 828
Extended Stay Hotel/Motel Sleeping Room 736
Golf Course acre 1,190
Movie Theather screen 2,720
Religious Center 1,000 Sq. Ft 1,330
Hospital 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,397
Service Station fueling pump 1,860
Supermarket 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,146
Warehouse/Self-Storage 1,000 Sq. Ft 358
Assisted Living Facility bed 412
Congregate Care Unit 302
Child Day Care student 658
Private School (K through 12) student 372
Auto Repair/Body Shop 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,146
Gym/Fitness Center 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,146
Drive-through Car Wash 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,146
All Other avg. weekday trips 151
MEASURE A IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2023
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description
REVENUES
Fees 2,260,042 478,638 341,300 2,184,755 Interest 202,051 142,893 5,683 6,394
Other Revenues - - - -
Total Revenues 2,462,093$ 621,530$ 346,983$ 2,191,150$
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 909,732 17,949 623,685 2,490,296 Transfer Out 337,557 - - -
Total Expenditures 1,247,288$ 17,949$ 623,685$ 2,490,296$ REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 1,214,805$ 603,581 $ (276,703) $ (299,146) $ 7,599,620 5,504,502 140,731$ 152,928
8,814,425$ 6,108,083$ (135,971)$ (146,218)$ Notes:
(1)
(2)
Financial Summary Report
City of Rancho Cordova
Suppl Offsite
WaterInterim Sewer
Sunrise Douglas
Council approved consolidation of the SD Library Fee, the Villages of Zinfandel Library Fee into the Community Facility Fee - Library Fee. For reporting purposes all activity reported in the individual library funds prior to the implementation of the consolidated library fee have all been reported in CFF - Library Fee
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Year Ending June 30, 2023
Community Facilities Fee Program
Community
Facilities (1) Library (2)
An Updated Nexus Study was adopted in April 2013 which combined facility fees which had been reported as separate line items in the prior nexus study into a single fee component called Community Facilities. For reporting purposes all activity reported in individual funds prior to the implementation of the combined fee have been consolidated for reporting purposes. ~ 10 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Storm Drainage lmpact Fee Prog.
Description
REVENUES
Fees 3,552,628 177,029 131,227 107,866
Interest 919,767 53,302 143,489 2,747
Other Revenues - - - -
Total Revenues 4,472,394$ 230,331$ 274,716$ 110,613$
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 2,578,756 48,933 599,520 7,185 Transfer Out - - - -
Total Expenditures 2,578,756$ 48,933$ 599,520$ 7,185$ REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 1,893,638$ 181,397 $ (324,804) $ 103,429 $ 36,038,238$ 2,075,040 $ 5,805,728 $ 56,425 $
37,931,876$ 2,256,438 $ 5,480,923 $ 159,854 $ Notes:
City of Rancho Cordova
Financial Summary Report
Program
AdminRoadway
Sunrise Douglas Fee Program
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Storm Drain
Program
Admin
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Year Ending June 30, 2023
Fund Balance, End of Year
~ 11 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description
REVENUES
Fees 8,419,105 780,767 345,645 1,128,369
Interest 596,193 65,392 - 35,889
Other Revenues - - - -
Total Revenues 9,015,298$ 846,159$ 345,645$ 1,164,259$
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 4,844,629 746,493 - -
Transfer Out - - - -
Total Expenditures 4,844,629$ 746,493$ -$ -$
REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 4,170,669$ 99,666 $ 345,645$ 1,164,259$ 21,710,352 2,548,311$ 591,390$ 939,858$ 25,881,021$ 2,647,977$ 937,035$ 2,104,117$ Notes:
(4)
Measure A
Transportation
Improvements (4)
Traffic Mitigation
Impact Fee (3)
Sacramento
Regional
Transit(4)
Very Low
Income
Housing
These fees are collected on behalf of outside Agencies during the building permit process. These funds are then remitted to the Agencies who expend the funds on projects in accordance with their approved AB1600 studies. The City relies on information provided by the Agencies to compelete the annual reproting requirements. The city does not audit the information provided by the outside Agencies.
City of Rancho Cordova
Financial Summary Report
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Year Ending June 30, 2023
~ 12 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUES
Fees 1,128,791 2,112,237 2,269,108 2,464,493 2,260,042 Interest 25,488 54,356 42,984 40,831 202,051 Other Revenues - - - - -
Total Revenues 1,154,279 2,166,593 2,312,091 2,505,324 2,462,093
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 42,330 79,209 85,092 92,419 909,732 Transfer Out 337,480 337,120 337,275 337,376 337,557 Total Expenditures 379,810 416,329 422,366 429,795 1,247,288 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 774,469 1,750,264 1,889,725 2,075,529 1,214,805 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,109,632 1,884,101 3,634,365 5,524,091 7,599,620 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,884,101$ 3,634,365$ 5,524,091$ 7,599,620$ 8,814,425$ Available Revenue 2017-18 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Current Year 1,154,279 2,166,593 2,312,091 2,505,324 2,462,093 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 729,822 1,154,279 2,166,593 2,312,091 2,505,324 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - 313,493 1,045,406 2,782,205 3,847,007 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - -
Total Revenues 1,109,632$ 3,634,365$ 5,524,091$ 7,599,620$ 8,814,425$ Result: Five Year Revenue Test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 City of Rancho Cordova
Community Facility Fee (CFF) - Facilities
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 13 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUES
Fees 243,439 309,257 428,804 496,369 478,638 Interest 73,113 81,168 45,710 33,491 142,893 Other Revenues - - - - -
Total Revenues 316,552 390,425 474,514 529,860 621,530
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 9,129 11,597 16,080 18,614 17,949 Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures 9,129 11,597 16,080 18,614 17,949 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 307,423 378,828 458,434 511,246 603,581 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 3,848,571 4,155,994 4,534,822 4,993,256 5,504,502 Fund Balance, End of Year 4,155,994$ 4,534,822$ 4,993,256$ 5,504,502$ 6,108,083$ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Current Year 316,552 390,425 474,514 529,860 621,530 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 200,773 316,552 390,425 474,514 529,860 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 310,865 200,773 316,552 390,425 474,514 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) 289,430 310,865 200,773 316,552 390,425 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) 135,118 (1) 289,430 (1) 310,865 (1) 200,773 (1) 316,552 (1) Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years 2,903,256 (1) 3,026,777 (1) 3,300,127 (1) 3,592,378 (1) 3,775,201 (1) Total Revenues 3,848,571$ 4,534,822 $ 4,993,256 $ 5,504,502 $ 6,108,083 $ (1) The Community Facility Fees - Library Fund reports funds being held beyond the five-years as described by AB1600. These funds are being collected for a future constructuion of Library Branch(es) and therefore must be retained until enough fees have been collected to start construction of the project.
Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Community Facility Fee (CFF) - Library
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 14 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUES
Fees 290,308 1,137,414 1,056,840 427,334 341,300 Interest 3,285 2,946 1,093 731 5,683
Total Revenues 293,593 1,140,360 1,057,933 428,065 346,983
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 298,958 1,112,598 1,168,263 371,240 623,685 Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures 298,958 1,112,598 1,168,263 371,240 623,685 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (5,365) 27,763 (110,330) 56,825 (276,703) Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 171,838 166,473 194,236 83,906 140,731 Fund Balance, End of Year 166,473$ 194,236$ 83,906$ 140,731$ (135,971)$ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Current Year 166,474 194,236 83,906 140,731 (135,971) Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - -
Total Revenues 171,838$ 194,236$ 83,906$ 140,731$ (135,971)$ Result: Five Year Revenue Test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 City of Rancho Cordova
Sunrise Douglas (SD) - Interim Sewer
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 15 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUES
Fees 426,962 513,957 1,638,485 707,455 2,184,755 Interest 2,958 1,610 1,430 770 6,394
Other Revenues - - - - -
Total Revenues 429,920 515,566 1,639,915 708,226 2,191,150
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 392,013 585,776 1,674,815 639,317 2,490,296 Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures 392,013 585,776 1,674,815 639,317 2,490,296 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 37,908 (70,210) (34,900) 68,909 (299,146) Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 151,221 189,129 118,919 84,020 152,928 Fund Balance, End of Year 189,129 118,919 84,020$ 152,928$ (146,218)$ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Current Year 189,127 118,919 84,020 152,928 (146,218) Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - -
Total Revenues 151,219$ 118,919$ 84,020$ 152,928$ (146,218)$ Result: Five Year Revenue Test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 City of Rancho Cordova
Sunrise Douglas (SD) - Supplemental Offsite Water
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
~ 16 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUES
Fees 4,157,115 7,794,321 8,308,575 5,422,457 3,552,628 Interest 366,059 426,346 274,564 217,342 919,767 Other Revenues - - - - -
Total Revenues 4,523,173 8,220,668 8,583,140 5,639,798 4,472,394
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 3,336,761 3,456,292 1,977,626 1,738,409 2,578,756 Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures 3,336,761 3,456,292 1,977,626 1,738,409 2,578,756 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 1,186,412 4,764,376 6,605,514 3,901,390 1,893,638 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 19,580,547 20,766,959 25,531,335 32,136,849 36,038,238 Fund Balance, End of Year 20,766,959$ 25,531,335$ 32,136,849$ 36,038,238$ 37,931,876$ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Current Year 4,906,434 8,220,668 8,583,140 5,639,798 4,472,394 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 2,517,915 4,906,434 8,220,668 8,583,140 5,639,798 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 4,111,280 2,517,915 4,906,434 8,220,668 8,583,140 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) 3,057,146 4,111,280 2,517,915 4,906,434 8,220,668 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) 1,781,651 (1) 3,057,146 (1) 4,111,280 (1) 2,517,915 (1) 4,906,434 (1) Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years 4,775,794 2,717,893 3,797,413 6,170,284 (1) 6,109,442 (1) Total Revenues 21,150,220$ 25,531,335 $ 28,339,435 $ 36,038,238 $ 37,931,876 $ (1) The Sunrise Douglas Park Fund reports funds being held beyond the five-years as described by AB1600. These funds are being collected for the future roadway improvements necessary to serve the growning population within the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan Area and therefor must be retained until enough fees have been collected to start contruction of the various roadway projects.
Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Sunrise Douglas (SD) - Roadway
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 17 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUES
Fees 195,348 357,436 370,841 234,248 177,029 Interest 17,445 23,084 13,916 12,474 53,302 Other Revenues - - 264,981 - -
Total Revenues 212,792 380,521 649,738 246,722 230,331
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 30,804 143,029 87,338 32,411 48,933 Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures 30,804 143,029 87,338 32,411 48,933 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 181,988 237,492 562,400 214,311 181,397 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 878,849 1,060,838 1,298,329 1,860,729 2,075,040 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,060,838 1,298,329$ 1,860,729$ 2,075,040$ 2,256,438$ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Current Year 212,792 380,521 649,738 246,722 230,331 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 111,348 212,792 380,521 649,738 246,722 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 130,424 111,348 212,792 380,521 649,738 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) 144,028 130,424 111,348 212,792 380,521 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) 95,312 (1) 144,028 (1) 130,424 (1) 111,348 (1) 212,792 (1) Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years 366,933 (1) 319,216 (1) 375,906 (1) 473,919 (1) 536,334 (1) Total Revenues 917,875$ 1,298,329 $ 1,860,729 $ 2,075,040 $ 2,256,438 $ (1) The Sunrise Douglas Program Admin Fund reports funds being held beyond the five-years as described by AB1600. These funds are being collected for the ongoing administrative cost and therefor must be retained for future cost.
Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Sunrise Douglas (SD) - Administration
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 18 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2021-22
REVENUES
Fees 1,669,234 2,291,789 2,438,640 6,659,774 8,419,105 Interest 400,159 369,215 162,169 126,258 596,193 Other Revenues - 39,037 1,047,841 - -
Total Revenues 2,069,393 2,700,041 3,648,650 6,786,032 9,015,298
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 1,910,560 8,389,095 2,133,479 2,773,678 4,844,629 Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures 1,910,560 8,389,095 2,133,479 2,773,678 4,844,629 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 158,833 (5,689,054) 1,515,170 4,012,354 4,170,669 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 21,713,048 21,871,881 16,182,827 17,697,997 21,710,352 Fund Balance, End of Year 21,871,881$ 16,182,827$ 17,697,997$ 21,710,352$ 25,881,021$ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2021-22 Current Year 2,174,563 2,700,041 3,648,650 6,786,032 9,015,298 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 1,628,008 2,174,563 2,700,041 3,648,650 6,786,032 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 4,063,390 1,628,008 2,174,563 2,700,041 3,648,650 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) 2,880,535 4,063,390 1,628,008 2,174,563 2,700,041 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) 1,144,114 (1) 2,880,535 (1) 4,063,390 (1) 1,628,008 (1) 2,174,563 (1) Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years 9,981,272 (1) 2,736,291 (1) 3,483,348 (1) 4,773,059 (1) 1,556,438 (1) Total Revenues 21,871,881$ 16,182,827 $ 17,697,997 $ 21,710,352 $ 25,881,021 $ (1) The Traffic Mitigation Fund reports funds being held beyond the five-years as described by AB1600. While projects are being completed on an annual basis, this fund is accumulation funds for the development and construction of a new interchange, a multi-million dollar project which is not expected to start construction in the next five year CIP funding cycle, therefor the funds must be retained until a funding level that allows construction to start has been reached.
Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fee
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 19 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1)
REVENUES
Fees - - 3,874,399 1,899,862 131,227
Interest - - 3,376 28,091 143,489 Other Revenues - - - - -
Total Revenues - - 3,877,775 1,927,953 274,716
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - - - 599,520
Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures - - - - 599,520
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 3,877,775 1,927,953 (324,804) Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - 3,877,775 5,805,728 Fund Balance, End of Year -$ -$ 3,877,775$ 5,805,728$ 5,480,923$ Available Revenue 2017-18 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) Current Year - - 3,877,775 1,927,953 274,716 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - 3,877,775 5,206,207 Total Revenues -$ -$ 3,877,775$ 5,805,728$ 5,480,923$ (1) The Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program was implemented in FY 2020-21 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.
Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program - Facilities
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 20 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1)
REVENUES
Fees - - 11,590 79,161 107,866
Interest - - 4 151 2,747
Other Revenues - - - - -
Total Revenues - - 11,595 79,312 110,613
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - 139 34,342 7,185
Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures - - 139 34,342 7,185
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 11,455 44,969 103,429 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - 11,455 56,425 Fund Balance, End of Year - - 11,455 56,425$ 159,854$ Available Revenue 2017-18 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) Current Year - - 11,455 56,425 159,854
Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - 11,455
Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - (11,455) Total Revenues -$ -$ 11,455$ 56,425$ 159,854$ (1) The Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program was implemented in FY 2020-21 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program - Administration
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 21 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUES
Fees 1,797,731 1,806,431 1,448,744 2,846,759 780,767 Interest 27,108 28,094 18,691 15,306 65,392 Other Revenues - - - - -
Total Revenues 1,824,839 1,834,525 1,467,435 2,862,065 846,159
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 2,346,404 1,951,497 2,457,075 465,526 746,493 Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures 2,346,404 1,951,497 2,457,075 465,526 746,493 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (521,565) (116,972) (989,640) 2,396,539 99,666 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,715,144 1,193,579 1,076,607 151,772 2,548,311 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,193,579$ 1,076,607$ 86,967$ 2,548,311$ 2,647,977$ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Current Year 1,193,579 1,076,607 86,967 2,548,311 846,159 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - 1,801,818
Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - -
Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - -
Total Revenues 817,132$ 2,199$ (987,441)$ 1,409,098$ 2,647,977$ (1) The Measure A Transportation Improvements reports funds being held beyond the five-years as described by AB1600. These funds are being collected for the ongoing project cost and therefor must be retained for future cost.
Result: Five Year Revenue Test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Measure A Impact Fee
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 22 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUES
Fees 85,978 194,011 144,149 159,551 345,645 Interest - - - - -
Other Revenues - - - - -
Total Revenues 85,978 194,011 144,149 159,551 345,645
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - - - -
Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures - - - - -
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 85,978 194,011 144,149 159,551 345,645 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 7,700 93,678 287,690 431,839 591,390 Fund Balance, End of Year 93,678$ 287,690$ 431,839$ 591,390$ 937,035$ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Current Year 85,978 194,011 144,149 159,551 345,645 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 7,700 85,978 194,011 144,149 159,551 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - 7,700 85,978 194,011 144,149 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - 7,700 85,978 194,011 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - 7,700 85,978 Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - 7,700
Total Revenues 93,678$ 287,690$ 431,839$ 591,390$ 937,035$ Result: Five Year Revenue Test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Sacramento Regional Transit Impact Fee
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 23 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Description 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUES
Fees 51,003 117,936 35,498 680,720 1,128,369 Interest 523 1,775 2,329 3,030 35,889
Other Revenues 175,000 50,000 - - -
Total Revenues 226,526 169,711 37,826 683,751 1,164,259
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 175,000 - - - -
Transfer Out - - - - -
Total Expenditures 175,000 - - - -
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 51,526 169,711 37,826 683,751 1,164,259 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year (2,956) 48,570 218,281 256,107 939,858 Fund Balance, End of Year 48,570$ 218,281$ 256,107$ 939,858$ 2,104,117$ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Current Year 48,570 169,711 37,826 683,751 1,164,259 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - 48,570 169,711 37,826 683,751 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - 48,570 169,711 37,826 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - 48,570 169,711
Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - 48,570
Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - -
Total Revenues 48,570$ 218,281$ 256,107$ 939,858$ 2,104,117$ Result: Five Year Revenue Test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 City of Rancho Cordova
Low Income Housing Impact Fee
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
~ 24 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Notes to the Annual Development Impact Fee Report
The Notes address two items required by Ca lifornia Government Code Section 66006(b).
Notes 1-3 provides information on any interfund transfer or loans mad e from a development fee account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loa ned fee will be expended. In the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest the account or fun d will receive on the loan is also provided. Note 4 provides information on the amoun t of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amou nt of reallocation of funds made due to administra tive costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded.
NOTE #1 – 2017 SERIES A & B REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION On January 25, 2017 $11,925,000 and $4,470,000 in Refunding Certificated of Participation (COP’s) w ere issued by the Rancho Cordova Finance Corporation (the “Corporation”) to refund both the 2005 & 2007 Certificates of Participations, wh ich were issued for City Hal l Facility Acquisition and City Operations. Principal payments of $ 190,000 to $1, 235,000 are due annually on February 1 st through February 1, 2035. Concurrently, the City entered into a facilities lease agreement with the Corp oration for the use and occu pancy of the facilities.
The lease agreement r equires the City to make rental payments to the Corporation equal to the Certificates of Participation’s principal and interest payments.
The CFF - Community Facilities Fee is r esponsible f or 62.5% of the principal and interest attributable to the tax-exempt COP’s (2017 A). As of June 30, 20 23, the CFF - Community Facilities Fee gross repayment obligation, including interest, totaled $ 9,745,506. Dur ing FY 2022-23 the CFF - Community Facil ities Fee made p ayments totaling $337,376, including bank fees.
Future payments on these COP’s are as follows:
Principal Interest Total
2024 368,750 336,780 705,530
2025 506,250 322,030 828,280
2026 531,250 296,717 827,967
2027 556,250 270,155 826,405
2028 584,375 242,342 826,717
2029-2033 3,390,625 742,648 4,133,273
2034-2035 1,515,625 81,709 1,597,334
7,453,125 2,292,381 9,745,506
2017 Series A & B
CFF - Community Facilities Obligation
Long Term Debt Obligation
at June 30, 2023
Total Payments Due
For the Year
Ending June 30
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
NOTE #2 – DEFERRED IMPACT FEES
In May 2008, the City enacted a Temporary Fee Deferral Program for certain development impact fees. This program allows residential and non -residential developers to d efer eligible impact fees normally paid at the time of building permit issu ance to the earlier of fin al inspection, issuance of temporary or final certificate of occupancy, or one -year from the date the fee deferral application was approved. Although orig inally set to expire after one year, through various Council actions, the program has been modified to remove the sunset date.
Developer impact fees deferred at June 30, 2023 are as follows:
Non-Residential
Fee Program Single Family Multi-Family All Types
Community Facility Fee - Library 10,762.08 - -
SD Interim Sewer Impact Fee 10,550.26
SD Suppleme
ntal Offsite Water Fee 7,645.89
SD Traffic Mitigation Fee 26,723.82
Transportation Impact Fee 2,787,612.98
Total Fees Deferred 2,843,295.03$ -$ -$
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRALS
at June 30, 2023
Residential
NOTE #3 – REFUNDS PAYABLE As defined by California Government Code Section 66006 (b) When the City no longer needs the funds for the purpo sed collected, or if the City fails to make required findings or perform c ertain administrat ive tasks prescribe d by AB1 600, the City may be required to refund, on a prorated basis, to property owners of the properties upon which the fees for the i mprovement w ere imposed, the monies collected for that project and any interest earned on those funds.
At this time, all fees being collected pu rsuant to the Development Impact Fee Program(s) have been earmarked for current or future capital projects necessary to ma intain the current levels of service within existing services area to serve new development.
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Development Fee Project Identification - California Government Code Section 66006 and 66001 require the City to make certain findings and meet reporting requirements on the use of development fees.
The following table, on p ages 28-30, illustrates several of the report ing requirements defined in the Legal Requirement section on pages 1-3.
• An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended an d t he amo
unt of exp enditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees. • An identification of an approximate date by which t he construction of the public improvement will com mence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement. • Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
• Designate the ap proximate dates on which the funding is expected to be depo sited into the appropriate account or fund.
Most of the current projects i ncluding a ll funding sources and ap proximate dates on funding can be found in the 20 20/21 – 2024/25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Some projects identified as “Future” in the Pr oject Phase column will not be identified in the CIP but will be found in the corresponding Development Fee Program instead.
Information regarding completed projects which received full or partial funding from development impact fees can be obtained by contacting the Finance Department.
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Project
Number Current Project(s)
Project Phase
(1)
Estimated
Start Date
Completion
Date
Estimated Project
Cost Budget to Date (2) Funding to Date (2)
Attrib. to
New Dev
Community Facility Fee - Community Facilities
Administrative Duties associated with Community Facilities Fee Program (inc. updates) Admin 2004 Post 2023-24 n/a 1,231,170 1,231,170 100% Animal Control Vehicles Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 106,000 - - 63% City Hall Cost Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 53,856,000 - - 63% 80075 Suite 220 Renovation Construction 2023 2023 1,000,000 1,000,000 822,980 100% Community Center Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 46,834,000 - - 63% Corportation Yard Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 26,291,000 - 1,026,842 63% Debt Service Payment(s) - Refunding COPS 2017 A&B Debt Service 2017 2035 23,750,647 14,844,155 2,006,846 63% Hansen Computer System Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,310,000 - - 63% Museum Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 19,993,000 - - 63% Parking Structure Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 16,571,000 - - 63% Police Facilities Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 56,085,000 - - 63% Police Vehicles & Equipment Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 4,172,000 - - 63% Total Community Facility Fee - Community Facilities 249,968,647$ 17,075,325$ 5,08 7,839$ Co
mmunity Facility Fee - Library
Administrative Duties Admin 2004 Post 2023-24 n/a 106,502 106,502 100% Regional Library Facility Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 43,858,000 - - 79% Total Community Facility Fee - Library 43,858,000$ 106,502$ 10 6,502$ Sunr
ise Douglas - Interim Sewer
Chrysanthy Blvd Lift Station Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,466,569 - - 16% Chrysanthy Blvd Trunk Sewer Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,506,556 - - 28% 80025 Douglas Blvd Lift Station Construction 2016 2017 1,730,000 1,730,000 531,238 100% Douglas Blvd Lift Station Reimb/Credit 2017 N/A 1,573,034 1,573,034 843,895 100% Folsom South Canal Crossing: Sewer Costs Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,545,991 - - 19% Sewer Forcemain: Chrysanthy Blvd Lift Station to Mayhew Road Outfall Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 5,802,192 - 17% Sewer Forcemain: Douglas Lift station to Chrysanthy Blvd Reimb/Credit 2003 N/A 660,607 660,607 501,929 100% Sewer Studies Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 30,000 - - 100% Total Sunrise Douglas - Interim Sewer 14,314,949$ 3,963,641$ 1, 877,061$ Sun
rise Douglas - Suppl Offsite Water
Folsom South Canal Crossing: Water Costs Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,566,583 - - 18% North Douglas Tank Site Land Reimb/Credit 2003 2007 1,386,000 969,000 1,045,833 100% Vineyard Wells 4-7 Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 3,520,000 - - 10% Total Sunrise Douglas - Suppl Offsite Water 6,472,583$ 969,000$ 1, 045,833$ Sunr
ise Douglas - Roadway
80008 Americanos Blvd, Douglas Rd to Chrysanthy Blvd Construction 2008 Post 2023-24 3,052,000 3,052,000 488,482 100% 80000 Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Environmental 2005 Post 2023-24 100,000,000 500,000 1,461,874 100% Americanos Blvd Phase II, Chrysanthy Blvd to Kiefer Blvd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 3,423,000 3,326,000 - 97% 80001 Chrysanthy Blvd, Sunrise Blvd to Rancho Cordova Pkwy Construction 2006 2019 3,762,000 3,334,000 3,372,883 89% Chrysanthy Blvd Phase II, Rancho Cordova Pkwy to Grant Line Rd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 10,431,000 10,431,000 - 100% 80002 Douglas Road Phase I, Rancho Cordova Pkwy to Borderlands Dr Reimb/Credit 2006 2015 2,146,000 2,146,000 2,434,196 100% 80004 Douglas Road, Americanos Blvd to Grant Li ne Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 6,585,000 4,961,000 2,639,051 75% 80015 Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova Pkwy to Americanos Blvd Construction 2010 2018 8,200,000 8,200,000 4,270,884 100% 80012 Kiefer Blvd Phase II, Sunrise Blvd to Grant Line Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 9,332,000 10,000 78 0% 80006 Kiefer Blvd, Sunrise Blvd to Jaeger Road Reimb/Credit 2007 Post 2023-24 7,510,626 4,026,526 4,026,526 86% 80005 Rancho Cordova Parkway, Douglas Rd to Kiefer Blvd Reimb/Credit 2006 Post 2023-24 11,857,800 11,228,500 4,315,238 95% 80017 Sunrise Blvd Widening and Intersection Improvements, Keifer Blvd to State Rte. 16 Preliminary 2011 2020 13,000,000 1,231,000 195,007 9% Development Impact Fees
City of Rancho Cordova
Development Fee Program Identification - Active & Future Projects ~ 28 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Project
Number Current Project(s)
Project Phase
(1)
Estimated
Start Date
Completion
Date
Estimated Project
Cost Budget to Date (2) Funding to Date (2)
Attrib. to
New Dev
Development Impact Fees
City of Rancho Cordova
Development Fee Program Identification - Active & Future Projects Sunrise Douglas - Roadway - Continuted
80003 Sunrise Blvd, Douglas Rd to Kiefer Blvd Reimb/Credit 2006 Post 2023-24 16,334,786 16,185,435 16,185,435 92% 80076 Frontage Improvements - Sunrise & Douglas Reimb/Credit 2022 Post 2023-24 430,352 430,352 430,352 100% Total Sunrise Douglas - Roadway 92,582,213$ 65,079,461$ 39,8 20,007$ Sunrise Douglas - Admin
Administrative Duties associated with the Sunrise Douglas Fee Program Admin 2004 Post 2023-24 n/a 1,783,832 1,783,832 100% Total Sunrise Douglas - Admin -$ 1, 783,832$ 1, 783,832$ Traf
fic Mitigation - Impact Fee
Americanos Blvd Phase II, Chrysanthy Blvd to Kiefer Blvd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 3,423,000 97,000 - 3% Americanos Blvd Phase III, International Dr to Douglas Rd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 9,247,000 9,247,000 - 100% Centennial Drive, International Drive to Grant Line Road Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 10,348,000 10,348,000 - 100% 80004 Douglas Road, Americanos Blvd to Grant Li ne Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 6,585,000 1,586,000 150,001 24% 80018 Douglas Road - Sunrise to Wst City Boundary Preliminary 2013 Post 2023-24 16,512,000 62,000 75,614 0% 80016 Easton Valley Parkway (6th Ave), Sunrise Blvd to City Limits Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 10,192,000 10,192,000 - 100% 80010 International Drive, Sunrise Blvd to Rancho Cordova Pkwy Loop Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 46,700,000 46,700,000 342,761 100% 80012 Kiefer Blvd Phase II, Sunrise Blvd to Grant Line Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 9,332,000 9,322,000 - 100% 80006 Kiefer Blvd, Sunrise Blvd to Jaeger Road Reimb/Credit 2007 Post 2023-24 7,510,626 2,643,695 2,643,695 86% 80005 Rancho Cordova Parkway, Douglas Rd to Kiefer Blvd Reimb/Credit 2006 Post 2023-24 11,857,800 629,300 - 5% 80000 Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Environmental 2005 Post 2023-24 100,000,000 8,082,000 6,841,343 8% Rancho Cordova Parkway South, Kiefer Blvd to Grant Line Rd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 3,876,000 3,876,000 - 100% 80011 Rio Del Oro Parkway, Sunrise Blvd to White Rock Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 12,024,000 12,024,000 - 100% 80017 Sunrise Blvd Widening and Intersection Improvements, Keifer Blvd to State Rte. 16 Preliminary 2011 2020 13,000,000 47,000 534,929 1% Villagio, Douglas Rd to White Rock Rd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 2,608,000 2,608,000 - 100% 80020 White Rock Road and Gold Valley Dr Signal and Intersection Improvements Design 2014 2018 900,000 350,000 342,062 39% 80007 White Rock Road Improvements Phase I, Sunrise to Rancho Cordova Pkwy Design 2007 Post 2023-24 18,366,000 6,987,000 4,046,148 38% 80019 Zinfandel Complex Phase I Feasibility Study Construction 2013 2020 12,585,000 8,147,000 8,362,420 65% 80033 Zinfandel Pedestrian & Bicycle Cr ossing Design 2020 Post 2023-24 3,815,000 219,000 177,899 6% 80040 Chrysanthy Boulevard Phase II Reimb/Credit 2020 Post 2023-24 4,035,287 4,035,287 2,463,135 100% 80055 White Rock Road, 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway to Easterly City Limits Design 2022 2025-26 1,350,000 1,350,000 435,464 100% 45009 General Plan - Circulation Element Update Admin 2021 2022 240,000 240,000 179,297 100% Total Traffic Mitigation - Impact Fee 291,643,426$ 132,850,995$ 26,594,768$ Traffic Mitigation - Admin
Administrative Duties associated with Traffic Mitigation Fee Program (including updates) Admin 2004 Post 2023-24 n/a 715,550 715,550 100% 80009 Villages of Zinfandel Traffic Signals Construction 2009 2019 1,411,000 11,000 2,244 1% PW Project Impact Fee Tracking Planning 2021 2023 3,380,899 100,000 198,391 3% Total Traffic Mitigation - Admin 1,411,000$ 826,550$ 916,185$ Storm Drain Impact Fee Program - Facilities
80007 White Rock Road Improvements Phase I, Sunrise to Rancho Cordova Pkwy Construction 2007 Post 2023-24 20,081,640 735,550 560,603 4% 80045 Monier Circle Flood Control Basin Design 2021 Post 2023-24 6,658,238 1,000,000 38,918 15% Total Storm Drain Impact Fee Program - Facilities 20,081,640$ 735,550$ 599,52 0$ St
orm Drain Impact Fee Program - Admin
45037 Storm Drain Admin Impact Fees Planning 2022 2023 7,185 7,185 7,185 100% Total Storm Drain - Admin -$ 7,185$ 7,185$
~ 29 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
Project
Number Current Project(s)
Project Phase
(1)
Estimated
Start Date
Completion
Date
Estimated Project
Cost Budget to Date (2) Funding to Date (2)
Attrib. to
New Dev
Development Impact Fees
City of Rancho Cordova
Development Fee Program Identification - Active & Future Projects Measure A - Transportation Improvements (Administered by Sacramento Transportation Administration) 80001 Chrysanthy Blvd, Sunrise Blvd to Rancho Cordova Pkwy Construction 2006 2019 3,762,000 356,000 - 9% 80032 Cordova School Zones Planning 2020 Post 2023-24 315,000 315,000 302,191 100% 80031 Sunrise Boulevard & Folsom Boulevard Construction 2020 Post 2023-24 165,000 60,000 44,357 36% 80038 2020 Sidewalk Program Construction 2020 2021 460,561 50,000 50,000 11% 80022 2016/2017 NTMP Project Planning 2015 2021-22 300,000 125,000 36,541 42% 80048 Chase Drive - American River Parkway Connection Planning 2022 2022-23 938,000 788,000 258,773 84% 80050 2022 Sidewalk Improvement Construction 2022 2021-22 501,000 100,000 37,346 20% 80052 Pedestrian Crossing Enhancement Project Construction 2022 2023-24 555,000 192,600 183,416 35% 80065 Sidewalk Improvement Project - Phase 1 Construction 2023 2023-24 750,000 25,000 8,425 3% Total Measure A - Transportation Improvements 7,746,561$ 2,011,600$ 921 ,048$ Sa
cramento Regional Transit Impact Fee
Horn Road LRT Station (City Allocation Only) Planning 2018 Post 2023-24 250,000 250,000 - 100% Total Sacramento Regional Transit Fee 250,000$ 250,000$ -$ Ho
using Trust Development Impact Fee
Administrative Duties associated with Housing Program Admin 2007 Post 2023-24 n/a 142,316 142,316 100% Total Housing Trust Development Impact Fee -$ 14 2,316$ 14 2,316$ ~ 30 ~
ITEM 9.4.
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit A to the Resolution
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.5.
DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Russell Ducharme, Neighborhood Services Manager
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2023-257 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$750,000 WITH THE SACRAMENTO SOCIETY FOR THE
PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (SPCA) FOR ANIMAL
SHELTER SERVICES FOR A TERM OF JANUARY 1, 2024, TO
DECEMBER 31, 2025
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with the Sacramento Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) in an amount not to exceed $750,000 for a term of two years, starting January 1, 2024, and ending on December 31, 2025, for animal shelter services.
BACKGROUND
The purpose and goal of executing this contract is to continue providing animal shelter services from the SPCA in collaboration with the City of Rancho Cordova Animal Services Division.
For the past 18 years, the SPCA has been providing animal shelter services to the City which includes protective custody, quarantine, and other animal housing related services. The SPCA services are integral to the Animal Services Division's efforts to enforce City code regulations regarding pet licensing and rabies suppression.
Staff is satisfied with the level of service provided by the SPCA and wish to continue this partnership. Staff negotiated the proposed two-year term contract (Attachment 2) to ensure continuity of service.
City staff recommends executing the contract agreement with the SPCA in a form approved by the City Attorney to continue providing the residents of Rancho Cordova with a comprehensive Animal Services program.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
The new contract ensures that the same services are provided as in the past, which include low-cost vaccinations, low-cost spay and neuter programs along with animal sheltering services. The cost of the contract is not to exceed $750,000 over a two-year term, and includes protective custody, animal quarantine, other animal housing related services, and SPCA software related costs. The City will attempt to recover costs imposed by the shelter by invoicing the owner of the animal as provided by law.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Contract No. 2023-257
ITEM 9.5 ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2023-257 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $750,000 WITH THE SACRAMENTO
SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (SPCA) FOR A TERM OF JANUARY 1, 2024, TO DECEMBER 31, 2025, FOR ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES WHEREAS, since 2005, the City of Rancho Cordova (“City”) has partnered with the Sacramento Society of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) to provide animal shelter services to the City of Rancho Cordova’s Animal Services Division and the City’s residents; and WHEREAS, the City is satisfied with the services provided by SPCA for the past 18 years and wishes to have SPCA continue providing animal shelter services to the City and its residents; and
WHEREAS, the City and the SPCA have negotiated a new two-year contract for SPCA to continue to provide these services to the City, and the cost of the agreement shall not exceed $750,000 over the two-year term of the contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute Contract No. 2023-257 in an amount not to exceed $750,000 with the Sacramento Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) for a term of January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2025, for animal shelter services.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 18 th day of December 2023 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
David Sander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
1 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND THE
SACRAMENTO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (SPCA) FOR SHELTER SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT is made on December 4 th, 2023, by and between the City of Rancho Cordova, a municipal corporation (the “CITY”) and the Sacramento Society for the Prevention of the Cruelty of Animals, a California corporation (the “SHELTER”), collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
ARTICLE ONE – DEFINITIONS
The Parties agree that the following definitions shall apply to this Contract:
Section 1.01 “Contract” shall mean the enforceable CONTRACT between the parties to perform a service in consideration for specified compensation.
Section 1.02 “Animals” shall mean domestic animals such as dogs, cats and domesticated rabbits, non-indigenous reptiles and shall exclude birds, fowls and livestock as defined herein.
Section 1.03 “Annual Payment” shall mean the annual amount CITY pays SHELTER for SHELTER’s services calculated pursuant to the terms of this Contract.
Section 1.04 “Birds” and “Fowls” shall be defined as an Animal belonging to the class of Aves including members of the parrot family and all game birds, including but not limited to dove, quail, duck, goose, pigeon, cardinal, blue jay, robin, sparrow, blackbird and crow.
Section 1.05 “CITY” shall mean the City of Rancho Cordova, a California municipal corporation.
Section 1.06 “CITY Ordinance” shall refer to Title 8 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code as same may, from time to time be amended.
Section 1.07 “CITY Licensing Program” shall mean the CITY program of licensing dogs and cats in accordance with Rancho Cordova Municipal Code section 8.06 and California Food and Agriculture Code section 30501.
Section 1.08“Community Cat” means a cat which is known to live in the community without the benefit of an owner.
Section 1.09 “Contract Fees” shall mean the monthly agreed price per Contract year for services rendered by SHELTER to CITY pursuant to this Contract. This rate shall be calculated by dividing the Annual Payment by the number of months (12) within the current CONTRACT year.
Section 1.10 “Facility” shall mean the facility or facilities used by SHELTER in providing shelter and other services for CITY pursuant to this Contract.
Section 1.11“Farm” or “Ranch” means any land zoned and used for agriculture purposes.
2 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
Section 1.12“Farm Cat” means any cat residing on a farm or ranch as defined herein whose presence is for the purpose of rodent control on such farm or ranch as identified under RCMC
8.01.016 and whose ownership cannot be determined.
Section 1.13“Feral Cat” means a cat which is known to live in a wild or semi-wild state without benefit of an owner or a cat which has escaped for a substantial period of time from the care of its owner and is existing in a wild state without benefit of domestication.
Section 1.14 “Livestock” shall be defined as set forth in the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and shall include swine, sheep, goat, horse, cattle, equine, or bovine Animal.
Section 1.15 “Redemption Period” shall mean the period of time that a stray Animal is held at the Facility to provide the owner time to reclaim.
Section 1.16“Return to Field” is a program that alters, vaccinates and ear tips feral/farm/community cats and returns them to the location where they were originally collected.
Section 1.17“SHELTER” shall mean to the Sacramento Society for the Prevention of the Cruelty to Animals (SSPCA) and its representatives.
ARTICLE TWO - IMPOUNDMENT
Section 2.01Facility. The SHELTER represents that its Facility shall house and process Animals for CITY in a manner for SHELTER to meet its obligations herein as well as meets applicable legal requirements for Animal shelters, including all rules and regulations pursuant to California Civil Code section 1813, et seq., including but not limited to, Civil Code sections 1834, 1834.4 and 1846.
Section 2.02Impoundment. The SHELTER agrees that it shall accept all Animals (with the exception of Feral /Farm cats) brought to its Facility by designees of the CITY, and its citizens. Such Animals shall be impounded under the exclusive control and custody of the SHELTER for periods of time as required by law, including the California Food and Agriculture Code sections 31108 and 31752 and Rancho Cordova Municipal Code chapter 8.08. Prior to delivery to the SHELTER, the CITY shall scan for microchips or search for a CITY license and use all reasonable diligence to notify the licensed owner, if any. The CITY shall not accept a surrender of ownership of an Animal by its owner at the Facility, except through the SHELTER. Any Animal not defined in Article One shall not be delivered to the SHELTER without calling and consulting with the SHELTER as to the feasibility of impoundment, holding, and care, or available options for placement. Feral/Farm cats shall not be impounded but will be held for 24 hours, altered (spay/neutered), and returned to the neighborhood/farm area from where they were collected. Community cats or kittens over one year of age, as defined above, may be referred to the SHELTER’s Return To Field Program.
Section 2.03 Holding. Except for feral/farm cats (which are discussed below), every stray animal delivered to the Facility by the CITY shall become property of the SHELTER to process in accordance with this Contract regarding impoundment and redemption. The CITY agrees that the passage of three (3) working days, plus one (1) additional holding day to begin from the date of delivery to the SHELTER of every impounded stray animal is the Redemption Period. Neither the
3 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
CITY nor any agency, nor agent of the CITY shall have any claim or right to any stray animal not claimed and redeemed during the Redemption Period. Should the CITY inform the SHELTER of its intent to continue holding a stray animal prior to 6p.m. of the final day of any given hold period, the SHELTER shall continue to hold the accepted stray animal for the time period requested by the CITY. The SHELTER shall be solely responsible for all costs and expenses related to the accepted stray animal(s) incurred after the holding period. Feral/Farm Cats shall be held for two (2) working days, including the day of impoundment, checked for identifications/proof of ownership (microchip, collar, tags, etc.) and referred to the SHELTER’S RTF program if no identification is found. Community Cats will be held for the redemption period set forth above, and then will be placed for adoption or referred to the RTF Program.
Section 2.04Care. The SHELTER agrees that it shall provide reasonable and appropriate care for all Animals delivered to the Facility by the CITY. This includes adequate shelter, food, water, and all other humane treatment.
Section 2.05 Veterinary Care. Unless prior authorization is provided by the CITY, the SHELTER’s acceptance and care provided for any injured or seriously ill animal shall be at the SHELTER’S sole cost and expense. Whenever exigent circumstances during the “redemption period” (see definition at Section 1) require the SHELTER to provide immediate emergency medical care to any injured or seriously ill accepted animal and such care is actually provided, the CITY may, upon request and in its sole discretion, reimburse the SHELTER for all, or part of any reasonable cost and expenses associated with the emergency medical care of the animal. The CITY understands that the SHELTER is not required to provide veterinary care to animals brought into the Facility by the CITY. If the CITY intends to impound an animal that is injured or seriously ill, the CITY will provide immediate veterinary care through the CITY’s contract provider. If the SHELTER provides veterinarian care to an animal that has been impounded by the CITY, the CITY shall pay the SHELTER for services rendered.
ARTICLE THREE– ANIMAL DISPOSITION
Section 3.01 Disposition Policy. The SHELTER shall have the undisputed right, consistent with Title 8 “Animals” of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and this Contract, to dispose of every Animal given into its custody in accordance with the following policy:
The SHELTER shall have the sole and exclusive right to determine the responsibility of persons offering to become the owners of unclaimed Animals and the suitability of the home offered, and shall have the sole and exclusive right to accept or reject such applicants for unclaimed Animals.
The SHELTER shall have the sole and exclusive right to determine if and when Animals are to be placed in a new home or euthanized but agrees to make a good faith attempt to place Animals prior to euthanizing them.
The SHELTER shall have the right to humanely euthanize any Animal impounded that is found to be physically suffering, injured or have a communicable disease prior to the end of the Redemption Period.
4 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
Section 3.02 Impoundment, Boarding and Adoption. The SHELTER agrees, in accordance with Paragraph 3.1 of this Contract, that if the owner of an impounded Animal shall claim the Animal prior to the Redemption Period the SHELTER shall collect from the owner the impoundment fee(s) together with the cost of board at the current rate per Animal. Further, the SHELTER shall require the owner of every impounded Animal to pay all applicable fees including licensing and vaccination fees of an impounded Animal which has not been inoculated and licensed, as required by chapter 8.08 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code. The SHELTER shall set, in accordance with the law, all fees, if any, it charges to the public for an Animal adoption.
ARTICLE FOUR-COLLECTION OF FEES
Section 4.01 CITY herein designates SHELTER and SHELTER herein agrees to serve as the enforcing agency on behalf of the CITY for purposes set forth in this Contract. Specifically, SHELTER agrees that it will act on CITY’s behalf by charging, collecting and/or accounting for those fees it receives pursuant to this Contract, including licensing fees, impoundment fees and boarding fees.
Section 4.02 Disposition of Funds. Any CITY licensing fees, impound fees, unaltered fees, and boarding fees collected or received by SHELTER shall be accounted for separately and shall not be used to offset the Annual Payment relating thereto as may be required in this Contract. Any monies paid in owner-returned cases to the SHELTER for impoundment during the Redemption Period shall be accounted for separately by the SHELTER but will not be used to offset the calculation of the Annual Payment. These funds shall be the property of the CITY and remitted to the CITY in accordance with this Contract.
Section 4.03 Waiver of Impound Fees. The CITY will allow flexibility to the SHELTER to waive impound fees for animals if the owner agrees to sterilize their animal.
ARTICLE FIVE- COST OF SERVICES AND FEES
Section 5.01 Fees Schedule. During the two-year term, starting January 1st, 2024 and ending December 31st, 2025 the CITY and SHELTER agree to the following: CITY will pay SHELTER an amount not to exceed three hundred seven thousand four hundred and forty-one dollars ($307,441) for the 2024 year and three hundred thirty-five thousand one hundred and eleven dollars ($335,111) for the 2025 year and the SHELTER shall accept, at CITY’s discretion, up to 1,837 Animals in each twelve (12) month period. The CITY also agrees to pay the SPCA for each animal in excess of the yearly animal intake limits at the rate of $183 per animal.
Section 5.02Contract Fees. The SHELTER agrees to bill the CITY the Annual Cost of Services and Fees in twelve equal monthly installments. City agrees to pay non-disputed invoices, net 45, from date of receipt of invoice.
Section 5.03 Livestock. The CITY agrees that the responsibility for seizing, securing, housing, and disposing of livestock belongs to the CITY. In the event, for any reason, the CITY delivers
5 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
livestock to the SHELTER which was seized in its jurisdiction by the duly appointed agents of the CITY, the SHELTER shall be paid for actual expenses it incurs to feed, house, transport and dispose of such livestock in addition to any other amounts under this Contract. SHELTER agrees to abide by all applicable law in processing livestock hereunder.
Section 5.04 Rendering Services for Dead Animals. CITY shall pay the SHELTER the cost of rendering services of dead animals (including animals that died by euthanization and/or during seizure), as follows: Thirty and Zero/100 Dollars ($30) per animal.
Section 5.05 Humane Investigations. Rancho Cordova Animal Control will respond to and investigate all humane cases. Humane cases that require the impoundment of an animal that requires extended care or quarantine beyond the “redemption period” will be charged as follows:
Thirty and Zero/100s Dollars ($30) per day per animal with the following limitations on impoundment at the same time: five dogs, five rabbits, ten cats per incident unless shelter authorizes additional animals at time of incident.
Animals held in protective custody will be charged as follows: Twenty and Zero/100s Dollars ($20) per day per animal (with the following animal limitations for impoundment at the same time: five dogs, five rabbits, ten cats).
The SHELTER will make every attempt to collect all related impound fees from the animal owner at the time of redemption. If collected, the CITY will not incur the daily charge. These fees will be paid to the SHELTER by the CITY in addition to the “Fees Schedule” as outlined in Section 5.01. Section
5.06 Software. The SHELTER shall provide the CITY with full access to shelter software program, via internet connection or otherwise remotely available at the CITY offices, and rights to all CITY data contained therein in the event the SHELTER changes software vendors. The SHELTER shall provide the CITY a minimum of four (4) users access to the software program.
The users shall be designated by the CITY. Such access shall at a minimum allow the designated CITY user to view and print and save all reports and databases related to the Contract, including, but not limited to, the status and disposition of all Animals deposited at the facility. CITY’s share of the costs of the software shall be four hundred seventy-three and Zero/100s Dollars ($473) per month. These fees will be paid to the SHELTER by the CITY in addition to the “Fees Schedule” as outlined in Section 5.01. The SHELTER shall provide the City with up to twenty hours training annually. When software program updates are to be implemented, the SHELTER shall provide the CITY advance notice and support to include training. The SHELTER shall ensure that technical support is available to the CITY during this contract period. Immediately upon termination of the contract, or upon the request by the CITY, the CITY shall be entitled to all data, files, documents, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, and other such material and property of the CITY as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the SHELTER in performing this contract. SHELTER will be allowed to retain copies of all deliverables to the CITY.
Section 5.07 Report.
(a) The SHELTER shall provide to the CITY, on or before the 20th day following
6 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
each month during the term of this Contract, a report setting forth the following information for each Animal delivered by designees of the CITY, and its citizens, to the Facility:
(i) date delivered to the SHELTER.
(ii) source of delivery (name of Animal control officer, citizen, owner surrender);
(iii) type of Animal (cat, dog or other);
(iv) assigned identification number of Animal;
(v) duration of stay at the SHELTER for each Animal delivered by the CITY; (vi) reason for impoundment if not a stray;
(vii) total number of Animals delivered to the SHELTER for the previous month.
(b) The SHELTER shall also provide to the CITY a report of any livestock or wildlife delivered by the designees of the CITY, and its citizens to the Facility setting forth:
(i) the date of delivery;
(ii) the source of delivery (name of Animal control officer, citizen, owner surrender);
(iii) the reason for delivery;
(iv) the type of livestock or wildlife;
(v) assigned identification number of Animal;
(vi) any expenses incurred to date.
Section 5.08 Financial Records and Audit. SHELTER shall ensure that all information as it relates to number of Animals processed on behalf of the CITY, to include those impound fees or boarding fees, unaltered fees and licensed fees, as well as the name of any the person associated with the Animal, their address, the reason the Animal was relinquished, and the location where the Animal was acquired or originated from prior to being relinquish to the SHELTER, if known is accurate, updated, and reviewed on a daily basis. The SHELTER agrees to provide CITY full access to these reports. The SHELTER’s financial yearly report must be accessible by the CITY Manager of the CITY on a yearly basis. CITY reserves the right to conduct its own audit of the records of the SHELTER at any time it deems necessary for the limited purpose of verifying the Annual Payment and the Contract Fees relating thereto, the number of Animals licensed, and the number and ratio of Animals processed on behalf of the CITY compared to the total number of Animals processed by the SHELTER, the length of stay of each such Animal and the collection of fees for various services and items.
7 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
ARTICLE SIX- RABIES OBSERVATION
Section 6.01 The SHELTER agrees to accept from the CITY Animals for rabies observation and quarantine. Such Animals delivered for rabies observation shall be isolated for a period of not less than ten (10) days or, in the case of a wild, stray or owner surrendered Animal, three (3) days if the CITY, in its sole discretion, decides to euthanize the Animal and send it to the Sacramento County Public Health Services for rabies testing. The SHELTER shall be responsible for the humane euthanasia, and storage. The CITY will be responsible for processing, transport, and delivery for testing of Animal carcasses for suspected rabies Animals. The SHELTER shall make available to the CITY, upon request, information about the disposition of any rabies suspected Animal. The CITY shall pay the SHELTER the appropriate fees for quarantine as identified in Section 5.05. If the SHELTER is asked by the City to process specimen for testing through Sacramento County Public Health Services, an additional $100 dollar fee will be charged to the City of Rancho Cordova.
ARTICLE SEVEN- LEGAL HOLDS
Section 7.01 In the event an Animal or livestock is being held by the SHELTER as a result of a cruelty seizure, criminal prosecution or other legal hold by the CITY, the CITY shall reimburse the SHELTER for any veterinarian invoices and medical bills incurred by the SHELTER until the Court awards the Animal or livestock to the CITY, orders it euthanized or orders it returned to its owner. The CITY shall not be liable for these costs in the event the Court orders the Animal or livestock owner to pay such costs and the same are paid within sixty (60) days of such order.
If the fees are not paid by the Animal or livestock owner, after sixty (60) days, the CITY shall be liable for those fees and shall remit the same upon invoice by the SHELTER. In such instance, the SHELTER confers upon the CITY all rights and remedies it may have by law or equity to recover such fees and costs from the owner.
ARTICLE EIGHT-CITY REPRESENTATIONS AND OBLIGATIONS
Section 8.01 The CITY represents to the SHELTER that, as of the date of this Contract, the CITY requires rabies vaccination pursuant to chapter 8.05 of the 8.01.016 Cordova Municipal Code, requires microchips for vicious and potentially dangerous Animals pursuant to chapter
8.07 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and requires licensing of Animals pursuant to chapter 8.06 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and regulates of the sale of Animals pursuant to chapter 8.06 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code.
ARTICLE NINE– SHELTER REPRESENTATIONS AND OBLIGATIONS
Section 9.01 Hours of Operation. The SHELTER shall keep its Facility open to the public within the guidelines set forth by law, under mandate or based on the operational needs of the SHELTER in accordance with the law.
8 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
Section 9.02 Use of CITY funds. SHELTER agrees that any monies it collects on behalf of CITY pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be handled in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Section 9.03Residency Verification. The SHELTER shall verify the residency of citizens depositing Animals to their facility through a valid CA driver’s license, State issue ID, or other proof of Rancho Cordova residency, evidencing a City of Rancho Cordova address.
ARTICLE TEN - INSURANCE
Section 10.01 Evidence of Insurance Coverage Prior to commencement of any work under this Contract, SHELTER and CITY shall provide and maintain in effect during the term of this Contract evidence of insurance coverages for general liability, auto and statutory worker’s compensation.
ARTICLE ELEVEN – INDEMNIFICATION
Section 11.01 Indemnification. SHELTER shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless City, it’s officers, agents, contractors, volunteers, elected and appointed officials, and employees from any claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public) or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of SHELTER’s willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Contract, except those matters arising from City’s sole active negligence.
City shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless SHELTER, their officers, agents, contractors, volunteers, and employees from any claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public) or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of City’s willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Contract, except those matters arising from SHELTER’s sole active negligence.
The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed within the limits of state law.
ARTICLE TWELVE - TERM
Section 12.01 This Contract shall be for a term of two (2) years commencing as of the date of approval by the governing bodies of both parties. Both parties may adopt, by written agreement, an additional one-year extension prior to the expiration date of this Contract. Either party may cancel this Contract at any time without penalty upon one hundred eighty (180) days written notice to the non-cancelling party. In the event of termination, the CITY shall pay those fees that accrue to the termination date and be refunded any credits that may accrue to the termination date.
9 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
ARTICLE THIRTEEN - DEFAULT
Section 13.01 SHELTER Default. If SHELTER fails in any material term or condition of this Contract, including failing to obtain or comply with applicable state law requirements for performing services hereunder, SHELTER shall be in default of this Contract. Whenever CITY determines it is feasible, CITY will give SHELTER a reasonable amount of time to correct the default upon written notice as to the nature of the default and the reasonable time period within which to cure same.
If SHELTER is unable to timely cure a default, then CITY may, in its sole discretion, terminate this Contract and shall thereafter be excused from performing any further obligations under this Contract. In addition, if SHELTER fails in any material term or condition of this Contract, CITY, as its option, may terminate this Contract, and CITY may thereafter pursue its remedies available at law.
Section 13.02 CITY Default. If CITY fails in any material term or condition of this Contract and SHELTER is not in default, SHELTER, as its option, may terminate this Contract, and SHELTER may thereafter pursue its remedies available at law.
In the event the CITY fails to remit to the SHELTER the Contract Rate or any additional fees and expenses due hereunder, the CITY shall be in default. The SHELTER may, in its sole discretion, terminate this Contract for non-payment of fees if the CITY has not cured its default after sixty (60) days written notice.
ARTICLE FOURTEEN-NOTICE.
Section 14.01 Any notice sent under this Contract except as may be otherwise expressly required in this Contract shall be written and mailed by certified receipt requested, or sent by electronic or facsimile transmission confirmed by mailing written confirmation at substantially the same time as such electronic or facsimile transmission, or personally delivered to an officer of the receiving party at the following:
To the SHELTER:
Sacramento Society for the Prevention to the Cruelty to Animals (SSPCA) Attn: Chief Executive Officer
6201 Florin Perkins Road
Sacramento, CA. 95828
Telephone: (916) 383-7387
Fax: (916) 383-7062
To CITY:
City of Rancho Cordova
Neighborhood Services Manager
2880 Gold Tailings Court Rancho
Cordova, CA 95670
10 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
Telephone: (916) 851-8777
Fax: (916) 851-8778
Section 14.02 Each party may change its address by written notice to the other party in accordance with this section. Any communication addressed and mailed in accordance with this section shall be deemed to be given when so mailed, any notice so sent by electronic or facsimile transmission shall be deemed to be given when receipt of such transmission is acknowledged or confirmed, and any communication so delivered in person shall be deemed to be given when receipted for by, or actually received by, the other party, as the case may be.
ARTICLE FIFTEEN-MEDIATION
Section 15.01 Any dispute or claim in law or equity arising out of this Contract or any resulting transaction, including disputes or claims involving the parties to this Contract, their officers, agents or employees, shall be submitted to neutral, non-binding mediation prior to the commencement of litigation or any other proceeding before a trier of fact. The parties to the dispute or claim agree to act in good faith to participate in mediation, and to identify a mutually acceptable mediator. Both parties to the mediation agree to share equally in its cost. If the dispute or claim is resolved successfully through the mediation, the resolution will be documented by a written agreement executed by both parties. If the mediation does not successfully resolve the dispute or claim, the mediator shall provide written notice to the parties reflecting the same, and the parties may then proceed to seek an alternative form of resolution of the dispute or claim, including through a court of competent jurisdiction, in accordance with the remaining terms of this Contract and other rights and remedies afforded to them by law.
ARTICLE SIXTEEN-MISCELLANEOUS
Section 16.01 LICENSES, PERMITS, and other approvals. SHELTER represents and warrants to CITY that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature legally required for SHELTER to perform the work described herein. SHELTER represents and warrants to CITY that SHELTER shall, at its sole cost and expense, obtain and/or keep in effect at all times during the term of this contract any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for SHELTER to perform the services under this Contract.
Section 16.02 RECORDS and inspection. SHELTER shall maintain records, books, documents, and other evidence directly pertinent to the performance of work under this Contract in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices. CITY shall have the right to access and examine such records, without charge, during normal business hours. CITY shall further have the right to audit such records, to make transcripts there from and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings, and activities.
Section 16.03 Attorneys’ Fees. In the event an action or proceeding is instituted by either party for the breach or enforcement of any provision of this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and all litigation expenses, including, but not limited to expert’s fees and disbursements.
11 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
Section 16.04 Enforceability. If any term or provision of this Contract is found to be void, voidable, invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction under the laws of the State of California, any and all of the remaining terms and provisions of this Contract shall remain binding.
Section 16.05 Time. All times stated herein, or in any other document called for under this Contract, are of the essence.
Section 16.06 Binding. This Contract shall bind and inure to the heirs, devisees, assignees, and successors in interest of SHELTER and to the successors in interest of CITY in the same manner as if such parties had been expressly named herein.
Section 16.07 Survivorship. Any responsibility of SHELTER for warranties, insurance, indemnity, record-keeping, or compliance with laws with respect to this Contract shall not be invalidated due to the expiration, termination, or cancellation of this Contract.
Section 16.08 Construction and Interpretation. SHELTER and CITY agree and acknowledge that the provisions of this Contract have been arrived at through negotiation and that each party has had a full and fair opportunity to revise the provisions of this Contract and to have such provisions reviewed by legal counsel. Therefore, any ambiguities in construing or interpreting this Contract shall not be resolved against the drafting party. The titles of the various sections are merely informational and shall not be construed as a substantive portion of this Contract.
Section 16.09 Waiver. The waiver at any time by any party of any of its rights with respect to a default or other matter arising in connection with this Contract shall not be deemed a wavier with respect to any subsequent default or other matter.
Section 16.10 Severability. The invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability, of any provision of this Contract shall not render the other provisions invalid, illegal, or unenforceable.
Section 16.11 No Third-Party Beneficiary. It is expressly understood and agreed that the enforcement of these terms and conditions shall be reserved to the CITY and SHELTER.
Nothing contained in the Contract shall give or allow any claim or right of action whatsoever by any third party. It is the express intent of the CITY and the SHELTER that any such person or entity, other than the CITY or SHELTER, receiving benefits or services under this Contract shall be deemed as incidental beneficiary.
Section 16.12 Non-Discrimination/Non-Preferential Treatment Statement. In performing this Contract, the parties shall not discriminate or grant preferential treatment on the basis of race, sex, color, age, religion, sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, or national origin, and shall comply to the fullest extent allowed by law, with all applicable local, state, and federal laws relating to nondiscrimination.
Section 16.13 Authority to Execute. The person or persons executing this Contract on behalf of their respective agency warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Contract on behalf of their agency and further warrant and represent that they have the authority to bind their agency to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
Section 16.14 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be in default by reason of any failure in the
12 ITEM 9.5. ATTACHMENT 2 Contract Number: 2023-257
performance of this Contract if such failure arises out of causes beyond its reasonable control.
Such causes may include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of government in either its sovereign or capacity, acts of the party whose performance is not sought to be excused, fires, flood, weather, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, failure of transmission or power supply, mechanical difficulties with equipment which could not have been reasonably forecasted or provided for, or other causes beyond its sole control. The party so affected will resume performance as soon as practicable after the force majeure event terminates.
Section 16.15 Entire Agreement. This instrument and any attachments hereto constitute the entire agreement between City and SHELTER concerning the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior oral and written communications between the Parties regarding the subject matter hereof.
AGREED to this day of , 2023, by the Parties as follows:
Approved to as form:
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA SHELTER
By: _
Chief Executive Officer: Kenn Altine
By: _
City Manager: Micah Runner
Date: ________________
Attest:
By: _____________________________
City Clerk: Stacey Leitner
Date: _____________
Approved as to Form:
By: ______________________________
City Attorney: Adam Lindgren
Date: _____________
Date: ____________
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.6.
DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Edgar Medina, Principal Engineer
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2023-256 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$150,000 WITH SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT FOR
DESIGN SUPPORT FOR THE U.S. 50/RANCHO CORDOVA
PARKWAY INTERCHANGE PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the City Manager to execute Contract No. 2023-256 with Sacramento Regional Transit District in an amount not to exceed $150,000.00 to provide design support for the U.S. 50/Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Project.
BACKGROUND
The U.S. 50/Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Project (Project) is a critical transportation link and project for the City of Rancho Cordova (City) and the Sacramento Region that will alleviate regional congestion, improve roadway safety, support economic development, and promote the livability and quality of life in the City.
The City has one of the region’s largest employment centers, second to Downtown Sacramento, with over 60,000 commuters coming into the City daily with projected growth currently underway south of the Project area. The Project proposes a new interchange on U.S. 50 at Rancho Cordova Parkway at the midpoint between the Sunrise Boulevard and Hazel Avenue interchanges. The interchange project will be a “south-only” connection and includes the design and construction of an approximate 2-mile stretch of Rancho Cordova Parkway that connects to the newly constructed segment of White Rock Road towards the south.
The new interchange design requires traversing over the existing light rail facilities (see Project Map) that are owned and operated by the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT). As part of the process, the City and SacRT will work together in developing plans and specifications that meet their respective requirements as the interchange crosses over the light rail facilities. This agreement will fund and reimburse SacRT's costs associated with providing the design support and coordination with the project.
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
Funding for this project will consist of SD Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Supplemental Transportation Fee, Sunridge Anatolia CFC, Sunridge Park CFD, Sunridge North Douglas CFD and Federal Grants. There is no impact to the City’s General Fund.
This project is included in the City’s current approved 2023/24 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Plan and in the 2023/24 budget.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. SacRT - Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Agreement
ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT NO. 2023-256 WITH SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $150,000 FOR DESIGN SUPPORT FOR THE U.S. 50/RANCHO CORDOVA
PARKWAY INTERCHANGE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the U.S. 50/Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Project (Project) proposes a new interchange on U.S. 50 at Rancho Cordova Parkway at the midpoint between the Sunrise Boulevard and Hazel Avenue interchanges. The interchange project will be a “south-only” connection and include the design and construction of an approximate 2-mile stretch of Rancho Cordova Parkway that connects to White Rock Road and will include a new structure spanning over SacRT’s light rail tracks and Folsom Boulevard; and WHEREAS, SacRT owns and operates bus and light rail facilities in the public right of way and within the Sacramento-Placerville Transportation Corridor Joint Powers Authority (SPTC-JPA) rail line corridor along Folsom Boulevard in the County of Sacramento; and
WHEREAS, the Project will require an adjustment to SacRT’s existing rail facilities and placement of new facilities within SPTC-JPA right of way; and WHEREAS, the City and SacRT desire to enter into this Agreement for SacRT to perform design review of the Project plans and coordinate with regulatory agencies to obtain approvals; and
WHEREAS, this contract will be funded through SD Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Supplemental Transportation Fee, Sunridge Anatolia CFC, Sunridge Park CFD, Sunridge North Douglas CFD and Federal Grants, The contract does not impact the City’s General Fund and is included in the City’s current approved 2023/24 - 2027/28 Capital Improvement Plan and in the 2023/24 budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute Contract No. 2023-256 with Sacramento Regional Transit Disctrict in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for the U.S. 50/Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Project in a form approved by the City Attorney.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 18th day of December 2023 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 2 ATTEST:
David Sander, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
SacRT Contract No:
City Contract No: 2023-256
Design Support Project Agreement for the RC Parkway Interchange 1 D
ESIGN SUPPORT PROJECT AGREEMENT
FOR THE U.S.50/RANCHO CORDOVA PARKWAY INTERCHANGE PROJECT CIP PROJECT NO. CP05-2003
T
HIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on December 18, 2023 (“Effective Date”) by and among SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT , a public corporation, hereinafter referred to as "SacRT", and the CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and collectively referred to as "PARTIES." WHEREAS, SacRT owns and operates bus and light rail facilities in the public right of way and within the Sacramento- Placerville Transportation Corridor Joint Powers Authority (“SPTC-JPA”) rail line corridor along Folsom Boulevard in the County of Sacramento; and W
HEREAS, CITY proposes to design and construct a new interchange on US 50 in combination with a new north- south major arterial roadway, which will connect the highway to White Rock Road and will include a new structure spanning over SacRT’s light rail tracks and Folsom Blvd (the “PROJECT”).
W
HEREAS, the PROJECT will require an adjustment to SacRT’s existing rail facilities and placement of new facilities within SPTC-JPA right of way.
W
HEREAS, the PARTIES desire to enter into this Agreement for SacRT to perform design review of the PROJECT plans and coordinate with regulatory agencies to obtain approvals.
NO
W, THEREFORE, SACRT AND CITY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. DE
FINITIONS
“S
acRT FACILITIES” means all facilities depicted or described on the PROJECT Plans and Specifications that are: (1) existing rail facilities and improvements affected by the PROJECT, including but not limited to the Overhead Contact System (OCS); (2) changes or improvements to existing SacRT facilities due to the construction of the PROJECT, which includes, but is not limited to all work involved in the demolition, construction, reconstruction, realignment, or improvement of existing SacRT facilities.
2. AP
PROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. CI
TY must submit all plans and specifications for construction of that portion of the PROJECT that will or may affect SacRT FACILITIES, including all bid and contract provisions (herein “Plans and Specifications”), to SacRT for review and approval. SacRT may request the inclusion of SacRT’s standard form construction terms and conditions in the construction contract.
B. S
acRT will approve or disapprove CITY 's Plans and Specifications within 60 calendar days of receipt. SacRT reserves the right, in its sole and reasonable discretion, to reject the Plans and Specifications if it determines that the PROJECT would conflict ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 2
SacRT Contract No:
City Contract No: 2023-256
Design Support Project Agreement for the RC Parkway Interchange 2 with SacRT’s ability to operate and maintain the light rail system. If SacRT disapproves CITY's Plans and Specifications for SacRT FACILITIES , CITY must make the required changes and resubmit the Plans and Specifications to SacRT for its review and approval, as provided in this Section. SacRT must not unreasonably disapprove or condition its approval of CITY 's Plans and Specifications. SacRT ’s approval of the Plans and Specifications will be evidenced by the signature of SacRT authorized representative on the title sheet of the Plans and Specifications.
C. CI
TY may not construct or cause to be constructed any portion of the PROJECT that will affect SacRT FACILITIES unless and until the parties have entered into a separate construction agreement to detail the authorization and procedures for carrying out the PROJECT at CITY’s sole cost . CITY must separately enter into any real property agreements with SacRT and the SPTC -JPA related to property interests that may be necessary for the PROJECT ; SacRT’s approval of the Plans and Specifications will not constitute a commitment by SacRT to provide any needed real property for the PROJECT.
3. E
NVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE.
CI
TY is responsible for completing all necessary environmental reviews for the PROJECT, including any supplementary environmental reviews necessi tated by design changes requested by SacRT under this Agreement.
4. T
ERM
T
he term of this Agreement commences as of the Effective Date and continues until: (1) the PARTIES have entered into a construction agreement; or (2) terminated by one of the parties on 60 days’ advance written notice.
5. P
ROJECT COSTS
C
ITY must pay all costs for SacRT to provide design support for the project including SacRT’s actual costs to (1) review the Plans and Specifications for SacRT FACILITIES; (2) coordinate with Union Pacific Railroad to the extent required; and (3) provide support for CITY to obtain regulatory approvals required to carry out the PROJECT, including approvals by Public Utilities Commission (PUC).
CI
TY must reimburse SacRT for actual costs associated with performing the tasks for the PROJECT in an amount not to exceed $150,000. SacRT must provide 30 days’ advance notice if it will exceed the authorized cost. This agreement may be amended to increase the authorized cost, subject to approval by the SacRT Board of Directors. SacRT will have no obligation to perform any further support services once the authorized cost is reached.
I
f the CITY disputes any items on an invoice for a reasonable cause, CITY may deduct that disputed item from the payment, but may not delay payment for the undisputed portions. CITY must document the amounts and reasons for such deductions to SacRT.
Unless otherwise agreed, payment against invoices will be delivered by first class mail ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 2
SacRT Contract No:
City Contract No: 2023-256
Design Support Project Agreement for the RC Parkway Interchange 3 through the facilities of the U.S. Post Office, postage prepaid, addressed to the applicable party in the manner set forth in Article 10.
6. DE
SIGN ROLES
T
he design of the PROJECT is the sole responsibility of CITY . SacRT has no responsibility for design for any part, component, or the whole of the PROJECT . No act permitted, authorized, or required to be performed by SacRT under this Agreement including, but not limited to, reviews, approvals, selections, inspections, or direct labor shall be construed to be design work by SacRT.
7. I
NDEMNIFICATION
CI
TY hereby agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify, defend , and hold harmless SacRT, the City of Sacramento and their respective officers, directors, agents, employees, and volunteers against all claims, liabilities, damages , and expenses (“Claims”) including, without limitation, claims for injury to or death of any person, or damage (including contamination) to any property, natural resources, or the environment caused by or arising out of design and construction of the PROJECT or CITY’s performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement, except to the extent arising from SacRT’s active negligence or willful misconduct.
N
othing in this Agreement is intended to make the public or any member thereof a third - party beneficiary hereunder, and no term or condition or other provision of this Agreement is intended to establish a standard of care owed to the public or any member thereof.
T
he foregoing requirements are not intended to and do not in any manner limit the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CITY or SacRT pursuant to this Agreement.
8 . INSURANCE OR SELF -INSURANCE
E
ach party, at its sole cost and expense, must carry insurance, or self-insure its activities in connection with this Agreement, and obtain, keep in force and maintain, insurance or equivalent programs of self -insurance, for general liability, workers compensation, property, professional liability, and business automobile liability adequate to cover its potential liabilities hereunder. Each party agrees to provide the other thirty (30) days’ advance written notice of any cancellation, termination or lapse of any of the insurance or self-insurance coverages. Failure to maintain insurance as required in this Agreement is a material breach of contract and is grounds for termination of the Agreement.
9. NO
JOINT VENTURE
T
his Agreement does not create among the PARTIES a joint venture, partnership, or any other relationship of association or agency.
10. NO
TICE
ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 2
SacRT Contract No:
City Contract No: 2023-256
Design Support Project Agreement for the RC Parkway Interchange 4 All notices, invoices, payments , and other communications under this Agreement must be in writing and will be deemed to have been duly given (1) on the date of delivery, if delivered personally to the party to whom notice is given, or if made by email directed to the party to whom notice is to be given at the email address listed below, or (2) at the earlier of actual receipt or the second business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices and other communications must be dir ected to the PARTIES at the addresses shown below. A party may change its person designated to receive notice, its email address, or its address from time to time by giving notice to the other party in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Article.
CI
TY: Albert Stricker
2729 Prospect Park Dr.
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
[email protected]
S
acRT: Sangita Arya
Senior Systems Engineer
2811 O Street
Sacramento, CA 95816
916-869-6361
S
[email protected]
11. BI
NDING ON SUCCESSORS
T
his Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the PARTIES hereto; however, any assignment requires the written approval of the non-assigning party, and any purported assignment without such approval shall be void.
12. AM
ENDMENTS AND APPROVALS
T
his Agreement may be amended only be a writing signed by all PARTIES. All approvals required by this Agreement shall be in writing.
13. A
TTORNEY'S FEES
I
f the services of an attorney are required by either party to secure the performance of this Agreement or otherwise upon the breach or default of either party, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and other expenses in addition to any other relief to which such party may be entitled.
14. A
MBIGUITIES
T
he PARTIES have each carefully reviewed this Agreement and have agreed to each term of this Agreement. No ambiguity may be presumed to be construed against either party.
ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 2
SacRT Contract No:
City Contract No: 2023-256
Design Support Project Agreement for the RC Parkway Interchange 5 15. P
ERMITS AND APPROVALS
E
xcept as specifically provided in this Agreement, CITY is solely responsible for obtaining all federal, state, and local permits and other approvals applicable to the construction of all or any portion of the PROJECT.
16. T
HIRD PARTIES
T
he PARTIES hereto do not intend to establish rights enforceable by any person or entity that is not a party to this Agreement and the provisions hereof are not for the benefit of any person or entity that is not a party to this Agreement.
17. EN
TIRE AGREEMENT
The M
OU and this Agreement embody the entire agreement of the PARTIES in relation to the matters herein described, and no other understanding whether verbal, written, or otherwise exists between the PARTIES.
18. AUT
HORITY TO EXECUTE
E
ach person executing this Agreement represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized and has legal authority to execute and deliver this Agreement for or on behalf of the PARTIES to this Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that the execution and delivery of the Agreement and the performance of such party's obligations hereunder have been duly authorized.
19. CO
UNTERPARTS
T
his Agreement may be executed in counterparts. The Agreement shall be deemed executed when it has been signed by all PARTIES.
E
xecuted as of the day first above stated.
CI
TY OF RANCHO CORDOVA SACRAMENTO REGIONAL
TRANSIT DISTRICT
B
y: By:
M ICAH RUNNER HENRY LI
City Manager General Manager/CEO
AT
TEST Approved as to Legal Form:
B
y:______________________________ By:
ST ACY LEITNER OLGA SANCHEZ-OCHOA
City Clerk General Counsel
ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 2
SacRT Contract No:
City Contract No: 2023-256
Design Support Project Agreement for the RC Parkway Interchange 6 Approved as to Legal Form:
B
y:______________________________
ADAM U. LINDGREN
City Attorney
C:\U
sers\philton\AppData\Local\Temp\Scrub\0a5gjilj\hmbcj4c5.DOCX ITEM 9.6. ATTACHMENT 2
MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2
ITEM 9.7.
DATE: December 18, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Matt Tamayo, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONTINUED USE OF MILITARY
EQUIPMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the continued use of military equipment for the City of Rancho Cordova’s process as it pertains to AB 481 - Military Equipment for Law Enforcement.
BACKGROUND
On September 30, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law a series of policing reform legislation, including Assembly Bill No. 481 (AB 481). AB 481 requires a law enforcement agency to obtain approval from the applicable governing body, by adoption of a military equipment use policy, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
The City of Rancho Cordova has established a law enforcement services contract with the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office and formed the Rancho Cordova Police Department (RCPD) to provide municipal law enforcement services within the corporate limits of the City.
The law enforcement services encompass duties and functions of the type falling under the jurisdiction of, and customarily rendered by, a city police department under applicable State statutes. Such services include: (1) the enforcement of State statutes and City codes and ordinances; (2) patrol and traffic enforcement; (3) investigative services; and (4) such other special services customarily performed by police departments to the extent specifically set forth in this Agreement. This contractual relationship allows cities that do not have their own independent police department to select law enforcement services that best fit the needs of the community.
Consistent with the requirements of AB 481, the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors originally adopted the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Inventory and Policy on Tuesday, October 4, 2022. Per the requirements of AB 481, annually, the Sacramento Sheriff's Office must take an annual report and the Military Equipment Inventory and Policy for
City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2
adoption by the County Board of Supervisors; that approval occurred on June 13, 2023. The current Sacramento Sheriff’s Order and Inventory List for AB 481 can be found on their website.
Based on our contractual relationship with the County, after approval, the policy and list become a standard operating procedure for the Rancho Cordova Police Department.
The City is committed to ensuring that we have access to the most up-to-date equipment to safeguard the citizens of Rancho Cordova. These items provide public safety officers with the necessary tools to help safely resolve volatile situations in an effort to safeguard lives and ensure safety.
FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
There is no fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Resolution
2. Sacramento County Staff Report - AB 481 Policy Military Equipment
3. Sacramento County Sheriff - AB 481 Military Equipment Annual Report 2023
ITEM 9.7. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481); and
WHEREAS, AB 481 (codified at Government Code § 7070 et seq.,) requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body by the adoption of a Military Equipment Use Policy, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment as defined by AB 481; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova (City) contracts with the County of Sacramento for the provision of law enforcement services through Contract No. 91-2010 and its related amendments; and
WHEREAS, this contract contemplates that the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department will provide law enforcement services within the City’s municipal boundaries; and WHEREAS, the City desires to maintain this existing relationship with Sacramento County and the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department; and WHEREAS, the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors approved a Military Equipment Use Policy on October 4, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors updated the Military Equipment Use Policy on June 23, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to maintain a consistent Military Equipment Use Policy as applied to both the Rancho Cordova Police Department and its utilization of law enforcement services provided by the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department; and WHEREAS, the City does hereby incorporate by reference Sacramento County’s Military Equipment Use Policy and desires to approve such policy as may be amended from time to time.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does adopt the County of Sacramento’s Military Equipment Use Policy.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 18th day of December 2023 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ITEM 9.7. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 2 ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
David Sander, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
CALIFORNIA
For the Agenda of:
June 13, 2023
Timed: 2:30 PM
To: Board of Supervisors
Through: Ann Edwards, County Executive
Eric Jones, Deputy County Executive
Public Safety and Justice
From: Jim Cooper, Sheriff, Sheriff’s Office
Subject: Receive And File The Sacramento Sheriff’s Office Annual Military Equipment Use Report For 2023; And Authorization For Continued Use Of Military Equipment And To Amend The Inventory As Changes Occur; And Authorization To Purchase And Acquire Military Equipment In The Future In Accordance With Military Equipment Policy
District(s): All
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Receive and File the Sacramento Sheriff’s Office Annual Military Equipment Use Report for 2023.
2. Authorization for the continued use of military equipment as shown in the attached Annual Equipment Report for 2023 and authorization to amend the inventory as changes occur.
3. Authorization to purchase and acquire military equipment in the future in compliance with the Military Equipment policy as shown in the attached Annual Military Equipment use Report for 2023.
BACKGROUND
California Assembly Bill No. 481 (AB481) was authorized by Assembly Member David Chiu and approved by Governor Newsom on September 30, 2021. The purpose of AB481 was to address the funding, acquisition, and use of military ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 2
Receive And File The Sacramento Sheriff’s Office Annual Military Equipment Use Report For 2023; And Authorization For Continued Use Of Military Equipment And To Amend The Inventory As Changes Occur; And Authorization To Purchase And Acquire Military Equipment In The Future In Accordance With Military Equipment Policy
equipment. AB481 added Chapter 12.8, Section 7070 through 7075 of the Government Code.
On October 4, 2022, the Board adopted an ordinance related to approval of a Military Equipment Policy in accordance with AB481 (Ordinance No. 1596). In addition, the Board authorized the Sacramento Sheriff’s Office (SSO) for the continued use of Military Equipment and authorized the SSO to make purchases and acquire Military Equipment in the future in accordance with the policy (Resolution No. 2022-0812).
In the attached Annual Military Equipment Use Report for 2023 there are three sections:
1. The Military Equipment Use Policy
2. An Inventory of the SSO’s Military Use Equipment, including details on the Use, Purpose, Justification, Authorized Use, Fiscal Impact, Training Requirement, and any Legal/Procedural Rules associated with the specified equipment.
3. Demographics of Use in 2022, which details equipment deployments and total events by zip code, race, age, sex.
In addition, the SSO is requesting the annual authorization for the continued use of the military equipment outlined in the report and authorization for the future purchase or acquisition of military equipment for replacement or addition in compliance with the Military Equipment Policy.
The SSO’s AB 481 Inventory and Policy will have the additional oversight of the Professional Standards Division, the Office of the Inspector General, and the Community Review Commission on an annual basis. Additionally, the use of this equipment is regulated by existing statutes and policies. The SSO made a presentation on AB481 to the Community Review Commission on May 16, 2023.
The military equipment in this inventory is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. The term “military equipment,” as used in AB481, in fact, does not necessarily indicate the equipment that has been used by the military.
Pursuant to AB481, items deemed to be “military equipment” include, but are not limited to, unmanned aerial or ground vehicles, armored vehicles, command and control vehicles, pepper balls, less lethal shotguns, less lethal ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 2
Receive And File The Sacramento Sheriff’s Office Annual Military Equipment Use Report For 2023; And Authorization For Continued Use Of Military Equipment And To Amend The Inventory As Changes Occur; And Authorization To Purchase And Acquire Military Equipment In The Future In Accordance With Military Equipment Policy
40mm projectile launchers, long-range acoustic devices, and flashbangs. The SSO is committed to using the most up-to-date tools and equipment to safeguard the community in Sacramento. These items provide peace officers with the ability to safely resolve volatile situations that otherwise might rise to the level of a lethal force encounter. To that end, the items in this inventory also provide Sheriff’s Deputies with vital tools that facilitate compliance with its stringent use of force policy. Other items deemed to be “military equipment” via AB481 include foundational equipment such as rifles. These rifles allow peace officers to address lethal threats with greater precision and from a greater distance.
The SSO is seeking to purchase new items, which are listed in the provided attachment “2023 AB481 Inventory Review” document. The requested equipment includes additional unmanned aircraft systems, breaching/flash bang shotgun shells, and ammunition.
All prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time. (See Government Code section 7071(d).)
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
There is no cost associated with the Annual Report provided. Any replacement or addition of equipment purchase as a result of the authorization provide by the Board will be funding through the SSO’s Fiscal Year 2023-24 Recommended Budget.
Attachment(s):
RES – Resolution
ATT 1 – Military Equipment Annual Report 2023
ATT 2 – 2023 AB481 Inventory Review Presentation
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 2
Jim Cooper, Sheriff
4500 Orange Grove Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95841
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office
Annual Military Equipment Use Report for 2023
Table of Contents
Military Equipment Use Policy ......................................................................................................... 1 Military Use Equipment ...................................................................................................................... 4 Demographics of Use in 2022 ......................................................................................................... 31 ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Use Report 2023 Page | 1
Military Equipment Use Policy
Specialized Enforcement Maximum Safety Equipment
(SEMS)
706.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
706.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):
Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Sacramento Sheriff's Office.
Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue service weapons. • Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Use Report 2023 Page | 2
706.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Sacramento Sheriff's Office that members of this office comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment.
706.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Sheriff or authorized designee should designate a member of this office to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
a. Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
b. Identifying the Sheriff's Office equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Sheriff's Office, or the equipment the Sheriff's Office intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
c. Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. d. Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Sacramento Sheriff's Office (Government Code § 7071). e. Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:
f. Publicizing the details of the meeting.
g. Preparing for public questions regarding the Sheriff's Office's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
h. Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Sheriff or authorized designee and ensuring that the report is made available on the office website (Government Code § 7072).
i. Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Sheriff's Office will respond in a timely manner.
706.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The list of qualifying equipment for the Sheriff's Office is available on SacSheriff.com under Transparency.
706.5 APPROVAL
The Sheriff or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the County Board of Supervisors by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Sheriff or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the County Board of Supervisors and is available on the Sheriff's Office website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the County Board of Supervisors prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Use Report 2023 Page | 3
a. Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. b. Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
c. Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
d. Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of the Sheriff's Office. e. Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the County Board of Supervisors. f. Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
g. Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above.
706.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment should not be used by any other law enforcement agency or member in this jurisdiction unless the military equipment is approved for use in accordance with this policy.
706.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Sheriff or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the County Board of Supervisors for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).
The Sheriff or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the Sheriff's Office website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in Sheriff's Office inventory.
706.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Sheriff's Office shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Sheriff's Office should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Use Report 2023 Page | 4
Military Use Equipment
Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS)
An unmanned aircraft along with the associated equipment utilized to enhance the safety to the community and officers.
Description, quantity, capabilities, lifespan and purchase cost for current inventory:
1. Autel EVO II 640T (RCPD), Cost:$6,900, quantity: 1, Lifespan:3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator day or night.
2. Autel EVO II Dual (RCPD), Cost: $10,000, Quantity: 1, Lifespan: 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator day or night.
3. Autel EVO II 6k, Cost: $2,100, Quantity: 1, Lifespan: 3 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter.
Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator.
4. DJI Inspire 2, Basic Video/Image capture (See URL for full Specs), Cost: $0 Donation, Quantity: 1, Lifespan, 3 Years, Annual Maintenance: $600. Website:
https://www.dji.com/inspire-2
5. DJI Matrice 200, Cost: No cost (donated), quantity: 1, Lifespan: 2-4 years. This is a remotely operated battery-powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator.
6. DJI Matrice 600, Cost: $4,800, quantity: 1, Lifespan 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter.
Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator.
7. DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Dual, Cost: $3,850, Quantity: 3, Lifespan: 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator day or night.
8. DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Zoom, Cost $3,000, Quantity: 5, Lifespan: 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator.
9. DJI Mavic 2 Professional, Cost: No cost (Obtained pursuant to California Civil Code Section 2080.6 ), Quantity: 1, Lifespan: 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Use Report 2023 Page | 5
aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator.
10. DJI Mavic Advanced, Cost: $10,000 , Quantity:1 , Lifespan: 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator day or night.
11. DJI Mini 2, Cost: $450 , Quantity: 10 , Lifespan: 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter.
Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator.
12. DJI Phantom 4 Professional, Cost: $1,600 , Quantity: 1 , Lifespan: 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator.
UAS No Longer in Service:
1. DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Dual, Cost: $3,850, Quantity: 1, Lifespan: 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator day or night.
2. DJI Inspire 1, Cost: no cost (donated), Quantity: 1, Lifespan: 3-5 years. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator.
3. DJI Phantom 3 Professional, Cost: No Cost (Donated), Quantity: 1 , Lifespan: No longer supported by manufacturer, not in use. This is a remotely operated battery powered aircraft designed to be operated within sight of the operator or a spotter. Each drone is equipped with a camera capable of relaying a real-time image back to the drone operator.
Proposed Uses
The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office SCOUT program uses Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) craft of varying sizes and capabilities to enhance public safety. All the crafts used by the program are the same makes and models available for purchase by the public. The craft are used in compliance with all federal, state, and local laws and are not used in any way for routine patrol or surveillance of the public.
Justification:
The wide variety of UAS utilized by the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office augment the Air Operations detail. They provide an aerial perspective that is directly viewable by Incident Commanders and Tactical Commanders during critical incidents and high-risk events. Because of these UAS, commanders are able to make split-second decisions that keep officers and surrounding citizens safe, as well as reduce the risk of a use-of-force encounters with a sequestered suspect(s).
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Use Report 2023 Page | 6
Rules of Use
14 CFR Part 107 Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems governs uses of drones. More information about the rules for public safety agencies can be found on the FAA website at https://www.faa.gov/uas/public_safety_gov/
The use of UAS is governed by Federal, State and local laws and regulations. The Federal Aviation Admiration (FAA) governs all aircraft rules and regulations for flight within the US National Airspace, including UAS
Sheriff’s Office General Orders:
G.O 26-10 – Unmanned Aerial Systems
Training
All SSO UAS Pilots have FAA Part 107 Commercial UAS Pilot License and go through 40 hours of initial training prior to operating any UAS in the field. This training includes but is not limited to, Federal rules and regulations, State rules and regulations, SSO Policy, Flight training (day and night), and SSO Obtained FAA Authorizations.
Ensuring Compliance
The Sheriff’s Office uses a Pilot and Equipment Flight Management System that alerts the administrators anytime a UAS exceeds standard operating procedures and when pilots are out of flight currency standards. The Federal Aviation Administration has authority to perform a compliance check of Sheriff’s Office UAS Operations at any time and authority to revoke issued Certificate of Authorizations. The Sheriff's Office has the authority to investigate any suspected UAS Pilot misconduct and take disciplinary action up to and including termination.
Fiscal Impact
Annual Maintenance and battery replacement cost is approximately $25,000.
Robots
Unmanned machine operating on the ground utilized to enhance the safety to the community and officers.
Description, quantity, capabilities, lifespan and purchase cost
1. PackBot 510, Cost: no cost (1033 program), Quantity: 5, Lifespan: 10 years. PackBot 510 is a man-transportable robot that performs bomb disposal, surveillance and reconnaissance, CBRN detection and HazMat handling operations. PackBot 510 easily climbs stairs and navigates narrow passages, relaying real-time video, audio and sensor data while the operator stays at a safer, standoff distance. The PackBot 510 manipulator lifts up to 44 lbs.
2. Remote Andros F6-A, Cost: $250,000, Quantity: 1, Lifespan: 15 years. The Remote Andros F6-A is a heavy-duty robot with stair climbing ability and an arm capable of lifting 65lbs.
The F6A also offers multiple communications options, a chassis and manipulator that allow for accessories and tool combinations, and quick-release pneumatic wheels for rapid width reduction.
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Use Report 2023 Page | 7
3. Qinetic Dragon Runner Robot, Cost: $90,000, Quantity: 1, Lifespan: 8-10 years. This is a compact robot platform that can be hand carried or transported inside a rucksack. It can be remotely operated from many hundreds of meters away, providing protection and safety to their operators.
4. Robotex Avatar Tactical Robot, Cost: $57,618.80, Quantity 2, Lifespan: until deemed unusable. The AVATAR® enhances the capabilities of SWAT and tactical response teams by allowing them to quickly and safely inspect dangerous situations, there is no longer a need to send personnel in before you’ve had a chance to assess the situation. The AVATAR® enhances the capabilities of SWAT and tactical response teams by allowing them to quickly and safely inspect dangerous situations, there is no longer a need to send personnel in before you’ve had a chance to assess the situation.
Purpose
To be used to remotely gain visual/audio data, deliver HNT phone, open doors, disrupt packages, and clear buildings.
Justification:
Robots are used in place of a person when practical to safely accomplish a task without putting a person in harm’s way. They can open doors, look at things, manipulate or move items. They can deliver equipment, provide communication, and aid in de-escalation. Often the only alternative to using a robot is to put an officer or bomb technician, or tactical personnel, in great jeopardy to accomplish a task that could be safely performed with a robot.
Authorized Use
Only assigned operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate the robots identified at sections 2(a)(i) through (ii). Use is established by the Bomb Squad Commander and or Incident Commander.
Training
EOD Robot operators (PackBot, Qinetic Dragon, Remote Andros F6-A) must complete FBI Hazardous Devices School and FBI Robotics School. Robotex Avatar drivers include lecture, familiarization, and driving training.
Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office to utilize a robot only for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.
Armored Vehicles
Commercially produced wheeled armored personnel vehicle utilized for law enforcement purposes.
Description, quantity, capabilities, lifespan and purchased cost
1. LENCO BEARCAT G2, Cost: $244,062 (2012 model), $389,256 (2022 model), Quantity 2, Lifespan: 10 years. The Lenco Bearcat, G2, is an armored vehicle that seats 10-12 personnel ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Use Report 2023 Page | 8
with open floor plan that allows for rescue of down personnel. It can stop various projectiles, which provides greater safety to citizens and officers beyond the protection level of shield and personal body armor.
Purpose
To be used in response to critical incidents to enhance officer and community safety, improve scene containment and stabilization, and assist in resolving critical incidents.
Justification
Should the Lenco Bearcat or Rook be removed from the current inventory, the ability to safely rescue, evacuate, and extricate civilians and law enforcement personnel from high-risk situations would be severely compromised and place the public, law enforcement, and the suspect(s) in an immediate higher degree of danger. In the instance in which there exists an active gun battle involving suspect(s) weapons such as high-power rifles and high-power handgun ammunition, or there exists a very high probability of the potential of an armed conflict occurring, normal “hardcover” such as standard patrol vehicles, body armor, helmets, portable shields, and even masonry or wood items, would not provide the adequate ballistic protection to safely evacuate and rescue civilians and public safety personnel from such an incident. This would effectively decrease the ability of law enforcement to provide lifesaving, harm reduction measures to the public and their own personnel, while at the same time increasing the risk to the suspect(s).
Authorized Use
The use of armored vehicles shall only be authorized by a watch commander or SWAT commander based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. Armored vehicles shall be used only by officers trained in their deployment and in a manner consistent with Department policy and training.
Fiscal Impact
$8,000 maintenance, $5,000 gas.
Training
All driver/operators shall attend formalized instruction and be trained in vehicle operations and practical driving instruction.
Legal and Procedural Rules
All driver/operators shall attend formalized instruction and be trained in vehicle operations and practical driving instruction.
High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicles, 2.5 Ton Trucks, 5-Ton Trucks, or Wheeled Vehicles with attached Breaching or Entry Apparatus
Description, quantity, capabilities, lifespan and purchased cost ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office Military Equipment Use Report 2023 Page | 9
1. 1985 AM General Corporation 5-Ton Truck, Cost: no cost (1033 program), Quantity 1, Lifespan: 10 years. The AM General 5-Ton Vehicle is a military piece of construction equipment. It is outfitted with a dump bed and is all wheel drive. The vehicle is not equipped with any weapons or weapon mounts nor is it intended to be deployed during any enforcement activity.
Purpose
The intended purpose for this vehicle is to provide aid in incidents involving major flooding at or around the Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center.
Authorized Use
This vehicle has never been deployed and the Sheriff’s Office is currently in the process of eliminating it from the fleet.
Training
Operating this vehicle requires a Class B California Driver’s License with an Air Brake Endorsement. All operators must utilize this vehicle in accordance with Sheriff’s Office General Orders regarding vehicle operations.
Fiscal Impact
None
Legal and Procedural Rules
All driver/operators shall attend formalized instruction and be trained in vehicle operations and practical driving instruction.
2. 1992 AM General Hummer H1, Cost: no cost (1033 program), Quantitiy:1, Lifespan unknown. The Youth Services HUMVEE is a show vehicle that is deployed and operated by a team of deputies assigned to the Youth Services Unit. The onboard equipment is utilized by Sheriff’s Deputies, attracting the attention of the public while providing tools to interact with them to bridge the gap between law enforcement and the community. The YSU HUMVEE is equipped with: Law Enforcement Radio Equipment to communicate with public safety entities in the region, Audio Speaker Public address system, Red and Blue exterior emergency response lighting White scene lighting/illumination Xbox game system Mounted televisions for multi-media use.
Purpose
The YSU HUMVEE is deployed during community events at schools, parks, churches, car shows and various other events as a static display. Additionally, the YSU HUMVEE is used for community parades.
Justification
The outfitted Hummer vehicles are always popular with the public. They provide an opportunity for the Sacramento Sheriff’s Office to interact with the youth in a manner that has proven favorable to a majority of kids. They are also a great way to answer general questions about law enforcement, and potentially recruit future generations to the profession.
ITEM 9.7.
ATTACHMENT 3