Agenda packet — Rancho Cordova City Council, January 6, 2025

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, January 6, 2025
4:00 PM – Special Meeting
American River Room
5:30 PM – Regular Meeting
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
How to Observe or Listen to the 5:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Virtually:
•Online via Zoom: https://cityofranchocordova.zoom.us/j/81630466928 Webinar ID: 816 3046 6928
•By phone: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782
Webinar ID: 816 3046 6928
Public Comment

Members of the public who wish to address the City Council may do so in person during the meeting by completing and submitting a Speaker Card to the City Clerk.

Members of the public who wish to provide public comment via email will need to submit comments to [email protected] no later than 2:00 p.m. on Monday, January 6, 2025. Written comments received no later than 2:00 p.m. will be distributed to the Council, filed in the record, and will not be read aloud. All comments submitted later than 2:00 p.m. will be distributed to the Council.

If you have questions related to the City Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 851-8720 before Monday, January 6, 2025, at 2:00 p.m.

AMENDED AGENDA

1. SPECIAL MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

Page 1 of 147 ends

Rancho Cordova City Council - AMENDED AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting of Monday, January 6, 2025

Page 2 of 5 ends

Council Members Linda Budge, Garrett Gatewood, Joe Little, David Sander, and Mayor Siri Pulipati

2. PUBLIC COMMENT

At a special meeting, citizens wishing to address the Council for any matter on the agenda may do so at the time the matter is discussed. Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not on the agenda.

3. SPECIAL MEETING ITEM

3.1. Subject: Discussion Regarding Regional Boards, Commissions and Committees.

Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council review the appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions and Committees approved at the December 16, 2024, City Council meeting and discuss a strategy for leveraging appointments in 2025 to enhance community and regional partnerships and support key initiatives and projects.

4. ADJOURNMENT OF SPECIAL MEETING

Mayor Pulipati will adjourn the Special meeting to the Regular meeting in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers.

5. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

Council Members Linda Budge, Garrett Gatewood, Joe Little, David Sander, and Mayor Siri Pulipati

6. METRO CABLE TV TELEVISION ANNOUNCEMENT

The Clerk will announce the meetings video recording and playback schedules.

7. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The Mayor will call on someone in attendance to lead the Pledge.

8. INVOCATION

There will be a moment of silence in lieu of the invocation.

9. PRESENTATIONS

9.1. New Employee Introductions: John Sapno, Administrative Assistant I by Darcy Goulart, Community Development Director, and Sabrina Howe, Administrative Assistant II by Kim Juran, Administrative Services Director.

10. PUBLIC COMMENT

Members of the public wishing to address the Council for any matter not on the agenda may do so at this time by completing and submitting a Speaker Card to the City Clerk.

For items on the agenda, speakers will be called by the Mayor at the point on the agenda when the item will be heard. Speakers are encouraged to keep comments to three minutes or less and to state name and community of residence.

Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited from

Page 2 of 147 ends

Rancho Cordova City Council - AMENDED AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting of Monday, January 6, 2025

Page 3 of 5 ends

discussing or taking immediate action on any item not on the agenda unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature or the need to take immediate action arose after the posting of the agenda.

11. COUNCIL REPORTS

12. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

13. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE

13.1. Subject: Meeting Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of December 16, 2024.

Recommendation: Adopt the minutes.

13.2. Subject: A Resolution Making Certain Findings and Determinations Related to, and Accepting, the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Development Impact Fee Report for Assembly Bill No. 1600 Development Fees.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

13.3. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Contract Change Order 2024- 105-01 with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. to Increase the Contract Amount by $34,382.20 to an Amount not to Exceed $258,777.95 for Construction of the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Phase 6 Project.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution

13.4. Subject: Treasurer's Report - September 30, 2024.

Recommendation: This report is informational only. It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the September 30, 2024, Treasurer’s Report.

14. CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE

None.

15. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

None.

16. REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS

16.1. Subject: Summary of 2024 California Laws.

Recommendation: Receive update.

16.2. Subject: Fiscal Year 2024/25 Art in Public Places Presentation.

Recommendation: Staff is seeking direction from Council on the recommendation that the City Council approve the installation of the following three temporary art projects for FY 2024- 2025, funded through the Art in Public Places Bucket of the Community Enhancement and Investment Fund (CEIF):

1. Lincoln Village Asphalt Art Murals – Intersection murals designed to improve traffic safety and foster community identity.

2. Rain-Activated Sidewalk Poetry – Poetry installations promoting accessibility and visibility during rainy weather.

3. Chalk Art Placemaking Words – Interactive chalk art installations promoting accessibility and community engagement during dry weather.

Page 3 of 147 ends

Rancho Cordova City Council - AMENDED AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting of Monday, January 6, 2025

Page 4 of 5 ends

16.3. Subject: A Resolution for the 180-Day Wait Period Exception for Hiring William (Steve) Harriman as a Temporary Extra-help Employee Under Government Code Section 7522.56 and 21224.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

16.4. Subject: Discussion and Potential Action by the City Council Regarding the Removal of a Regular Planning Commission Member.

Recommendation: There is no recommendation by staff. The City Council will discuss and potentially take action on the removal of a Regular Planning Commission Member and could direct staff to proceed with the process of filling the vacant seat if needed.

17. COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

18. ADJOURNMENT

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Special Meetings listed below are subject to change/cancellation without further notice.

Unless the Council adopts a motion to extend the meeting, any item that is not initiated before 11:00 p.m. will be continued to the next day at 5:30 p.m. or scheduled on the next regular meeting agenda of the Council.

Public documents related to items on the open session portion of this agenda, which are distributed to the City Council less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, shall be available for public inspection at the time the documents are distributed to the Council. Documents are available for inspection at the City Clerk's office located in Rancho Cordova City Hall.

The agenda items are accessible on the City’s website at www.cityofranchocordova.org on Thursdays or Fridays prior to the Regular City Council Meeting.

UPCOMING MEETINGS
January 21, 2025 5:30 PM Regular Meeting
January 28, 2025 9:00 AM Special Meeting/Work Session
February 3, 2025 3:00 PM Special Meeting/5:30 PM Regular Meeting February 11, 2025 5:30 PM Special Meeting/Work Session
February 18, 2025 5:30 PM Regular Meeting
February 25, 2025 5:30 PM Special Meeting/Work Session
March 3, 2025 4:00 PM Special Meeting/5:30 PM Regular Meeting March 17, 2025 5:30 PM Regular Meeting
If you have any technical questions related to the agenda items, please contact City Hall at (916) 851- 8700.

The Rancho Cordova City Council meeting will be videotaped in its entirety and will be cablecast without interruption on Metro Cable 14, the Government Affairs Channel on the Comcast and Direct TV U-Verse Systems. Closed Captioning will be available on the playback cablecast. A DVD copy is

Page 4 of 147 ends

Rancho Cordova City Council - AMENDED AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting of Monday, January 6, 2025

Page 5 of 5 ends

available from the City Clerk’s Department and a webcast of this meeting will be available for viewing via video streaming from the City’s website within 48 hours of adjournment of this meeting.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 851-8720 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA
I, Stacy Leitner, City Clerk for the City of Rancho Cordova, declare that the foregoing agenda for the January 6, 2025, Regular Meeting of the Rancho Cordova City Council was posted and available for review on January 2, 2025, at City Hall of the City of Rancho Cordova, 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, California, 95670. The agenda is also available on the city website at www.cityofranchocordova.org.

Signed January 2, 2025, at Rancho Cordova, California.

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 5 of 147 ends

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 3.1.

DATE: January 6, 2025

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Stacy Leitner, City Clerk

SUBJECT: DISCUSSION REGARDING REGIONAL BOARDS, COMMISSIONS

AND COMMITTEES

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends the City Council review the appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions and Committees approved at the December 16, 2024, City Council meeting and discuss a strategy for leveraging appointments in 2025 to enhance community and regional partnerships and support key initiatives and projects.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Following Council's discussion, appointed representatives to the City's Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees will improve communication between the City Council and its appointed representatives, strengthen the City's ability to address regional and community needs, and ensure that appointees are effectively contributing to the City’s long-term goals and initiatives.

BACKGROUND

The Sacramento Region has several public agencies that oversee various services within the region. Many municipalities are represented on these agencies' governing boards or commissions, usually one or more elected official from each jurisdiction, to provide representation throughout the region.

At the December 16, 2024, City Council meeting, the City Council reviewed and approved appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees for 2025 (Attachment 1).

During the discussion, the City Council asked staff to bring this topic back for the City Council to further discuss a strategy for leveraging appointments in 2025 to enhance community and regional partnerships and support key initiatives and projects.

Included in this report is a comprehensive overview (Attachment 2) of current appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees for 2025, which includes: the times and locations for each meeting, a brief background, currently assigned council members, and agency/committee contact information.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no fiscal impact.

Page 6 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. 2025 Adopted City Council Appointments to Regional Boards Commissions and Committees

2. Overview of City Council Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees

Page 7 of 147 ends

1 2025 Adopted City Council Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees
Name Meeting Schedule 2024 2025
Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)
• Capitol Valley Regional SAFE
• Airport Land Use Commission
3rd Thursday
of the month at
9:30 a.m.

Appointee: Sander
Alt: Terry
Appointee: Sander
Alt: Budge
Sacramento Regional Transit District 2nd and 4th
Monday of the
month at 4:00 p.m.

Appointee: Budge
Alt: Sander
Appointee: Budge
Alt: Sander
Sacramento Transportation Authority 2nd Thursday of
the month at
1:30 p.m.

Appointee: Terry
Alt: Pulipati
Appointee: Pulipati
Alt: Gatewood
Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers Authority Last Friday of the month at
8:30 a.m.

Appointee: Gatewood
Alt: Pulipati
Appointee: Gatewood
Alt: Little
Sacramento Placerville Transportation Corridor Joint
Powers Authority
Quarterly
at 9:30 a.m.

Appointee: Sander
Alt: Budge
Appointee: Sander
Alt: Budge
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management
District
4th Thursday of the
month at 9:00 a.m.

Appointee: Terry
Alt: Pulipati
Appointee: Sander
Alt: Pulipati
ITEM 3.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 8 of 147 ends

2 2025 Proposed City Council Appointments - Continued
Name Meeting Schedule 2024 2025
Sacramento Area Sewer District
• Northern California Sanitation Agencies
Financing Authority
2nd and 4th Wednesday
of the month at 9:30 a.m.

Appointee: Sander
Alt: Pulipati
Appointee: Sander
Alt: Little
Regional San
• Sacramento Regional County Sanitation
District
2nd and 4th Wednesday
of the month at
9:30 a.m.

Appointee: Sander
Alt: Pulipati
N/A
Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television
Commission
Quarterly in March, June,
September, and December
at 2:30 p.m.

Appointee: Pulipati
Alt: Gatewood
Appointee: Pulipati
Alt: Gatewood
Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control
District
3rd Tuesday of the month
at 10:00 a.m.

Appointee:

Robert McGarvey
Alt: Sander
Appointee:

Robert McGarvey
Alt: Sander
**2-year term
(2025-2026)
South Sacramento Conservation Agency Joint
Powers Authority
Last Monday of every
other month at 11:00 a.m.

Appointees:

Budge, Gatewood
Alt: Terry, Pulipati
Appointees:

Budge, Gatewood
Alt: Little, Pulipati
2025 Proposed City Council Regional Boards, Commissions, and Ad-hoc Committee Appointments - Continued
2025 Adopted City Council Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees - Continued
ITEM 3.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 9 of 147 ends

3 2025 Proposed City Council Appointments - Continued
Name Meeting Schedule 2024 2025
Greater Sacramento Economic Council Quarterly Appointee: Sander Appointee: Pulipati Alt: Gatewood
Sacramento Local Agency Formation
Commission
1st Wednesday
of the month at 5:30 p.m.

City’s Next Term
2033-2034
City’s Next Term
2033-2034
Sacramento Public Library Authority
Governing Board
4th Thursday of the
month at 3:00 p.m.

Appointee: Gatewood
Alt: Budge
Appointee: Little
Alt: Budge
Lower American River Conservancy
Program Advisory Committee
As Needed Appointee: Terry
Alt: Gatewood
Appointee: Little
Alt: Gatewood
Folsom Lake College Philanthropy Council Monthly Appointee: Pulipati Appointee: Pulipati City Selection Committee of Sacramento
County
As Needed Appointee: Mayor Appointee: Mayor
Sacramento County Criminal Justice
Cabinet
Meetings Quarterly
January/April/July/October
Appointee: Mayor
Alt: Pulipati
Designee: Chief of
Police
Appointee: Mayor
Alt: Little
Designee: Chief of
Police
2025 Adopted City Council Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees - Continued
ITEM 3.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 10 of 147 ends

4 2025 Proposed City Council Appointments - Continued
Name Meeting Schedule 2024 2025
Sacramento Homeless Policy Council Quarterly Appointee: Terry Appointee: Little Alt: Gatewood
2025 Adopted City Council Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees - Continued
ITEM 3.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 11 of 147 ends

5 Name of Ad-hoc Committee 2024 2025
Sacramento County (M/VM) Designees: Sander, Pulipati Designees: Pulipati, Gatewood Elk Grove Unified School District Designees: Pulipati, Terry Designees: Pulipati, Gatewood Folsom Cordova Unified School District Designees: Sander, Budge Designees: Sander, Budge Sacramento City Unified School District Designees: Terry, Gatewood Designees: Gatewood, Little Golden State Water Company Designees: Pulipati, Budge Designees: Sander, Budge Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District Designees: Gatewood, Budge Designees: Pulipati, Budge Gateway Signage Committee Designees: Sander, Budge Designees: Sander, Budge Growing Strong Neighborhoods Designees: Sander, Terry Designees: Sander, Little Cordova Recreation and Park District Designees: Gatewood, Pulipati Designees: Pulipati, Gatewood Rancho Cordova Technology & Innovation
Committee
Designees: Gatewood, Pulipati Designees: Pulipati, Gatewood 2025 Adopted City Council Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees (continued)
ITEM 3.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 12 of 147 ends

ITEM 3.1. ATTACHMENT 2
1 2025 City of Rancho Cordova City Council Overview of
Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Board of Directors Meets 3rd Thursday of each month at 9:30 a.m. at SACOG, 1415 L Street, Suite 300, Sacramento Background Information: In partnership with its 28 member cities and counties, SACOG provides leadership in a collaborative public forum for achieving an efficient regional transportation system, innovating and integrated regional planning, and a high quality of life within the Greater Sacramento region. SACOG is a 32-member Board of Directors (31 voting and 1 non-voting). Voting members are appointed by member jurisdictions from their county board of supervisors or city councils. The one non-voting member is the Caltrans District 3 Director. Source: www.sacog.org Council Member(s):

David Sander, Appointee (2012-present)
Linda Budge, Alternate (1/1/2025-present)
Contact:

Lanette Espinoza, Clerk of the Board, [email protected] James Corless, Executive Director

Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) Board of Directors Meets 2nd and 4th Monday of each month at 4:00 p.m. at the Sacramento Regional Transit Q Street Auditorium, 1102 Q Street, 4th Floor, Suite 4600, Sacramento Background Information: SacRT began operations on April 1, 1973, following the acquisition of the Sacramento Transportation Authority. Today, SacRT operates more than 82 bus routes, 43 miles of light rail with 53 stations, and ADA paratransit services across a 440-square-mile service area in Sacramento County, including the cities of Sacramento, Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom, and Rancho Cordova. SacRT is overseen by a 12-member Board of Directors. Source: www.sacrt.com Council Member(s):

Linda Budge, Appointee (2012-present)
David Sander, Alternate (2012-present)
Contact:

Tabetha Smith, Clerk of the Board, [email protected]
Henry Li, General Manager/CEO

Page 13 of 147 ends

ITEM 3.1. ATTACHMENT 2
2 Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) Board of Directors Meets 2nd Thursday of each month at 1:30 p.m. at the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors’ Chambers, 700 H Street, Sacramento
Background Information: The STA was established in 1988 as a local transportation authority following the approval of the original Measure A by voters. Its mission is to offer a wide range of transportation programs and services to beneﬁt the 1.6 million residents of Sacramento County, enhancing the communities where they live, work, and play. The STA is governed by a 16-member Board of Directors, representing Sacramento, Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom, Galt/Isleton, and Rancho Cordova. Source: www.sacta.org
Council Member(s):

Siri Pulipati, Appointee (1/1/2025-present)
Garrett Gatewood, Alternate (1/1/2025-present)
Contact:

Jennifer Doll, Office Manager, [email protected]
Kevin Bewsey, Executive Director

Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors Meets the last Friday of each month at 8:30 a.m. at Rancho Cordova City Hall, Council Chambers, 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova
Background Information: In December 2006, the cities of Elk Grove, Folsom, and Rancho Cordova, along with El Dorado and Sacramento counties, joined forces to create a joint powers authority (JPA) to advance the planning, environmental review, engineering design, and development of the Elk Grove-Rancho Cordova-El Dorado Connector Project (the Connector). Source:
www.connectorjpa.com
Council Member(s):

Garrett Gatewood, Appointee (2023-present)
Joe Little, Alternate (1/1/2025-present)
Contact:

Derek Minnema, Executive Director, [email protected]

Sacramento Placerville Transportation Corridor Joint Powers Authority (SPTC-JPA) Meets quarterly at 9:30 a.m. at Folsom City Hall, Council Chambers, 50 Natoma Street, Folsom Background Information: The SPTC-JPA is a public entity established in 1991 with the aim of acquiring 53 miles of the Placerville Branch right of way from Southern Paciﬁc. After completing the purchase in September 1996, the SPTC-JPA and its member agencies entered into a Reciprocal Use and Funding Agreement (RUFA) to deﬁne their shared and individual rights and responsibilities regarding the acquisition, ownership, use, operation, improvement, maintenance, ﬁnancial

Page 14 of 147 ends

ITEM 3.1. ATTACHMENT 2
3 management, and eventual disposal of the rail corridor. The SPTC-JPA remains active, focusing on preserving the corridor for transportation and overseeing property management.

The four member agencies are: 1) County of El Dorado, 2) City of Folsom, 3) County of Sacramento, and 4) Sacramento Regional Transit District. A ﬁfth Director at Large is chosen by the four appointed Directors, and the current Director at Large is Rancho Cordova City Council Member David Sander.

Source: www.sptc-jpa.org
Council Member(s):

David Sander, Appointee (2012-present)
Linda Budge, Alternate (2012-present)
Contact:

Jen Thiot, Administrative Assistant, [email protected]

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District Board of Directors Typically meets the 4th Thursday of each month at 9:00 a.m. at the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors’ Chambers, 700 H Street, Sacramento
Background Information: The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District was established in 1996 under Health and Safety Code Sections 40960 et. Seq. to monitor, promote, and improve air quality in Sacramento County. It is one of 35 regional air quality districts in California. The District is tasked with monitoring air pollution within the Basin and developing and implementing programs to reduce pollution levels to meet state and federal health-based standards. The Board of Directors consists of 14 members, including all ﬁve Sacramento County Supervisors, four members of the Sacramento City Council, one representative from each of the cities of Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom, and Rancho Cordova, and one member representing the cities of Galt and Isleton. Source: www.airquality.org
Council Member(s):

David Sander, Appointee (1/1/2025-present)
Siri Pulipati, Alternate (2021-present)
Contact:

Salina Martinez, Clerk of the Board, [email protected] Alberto Ayala, Executive Director

Sacramento Area Sewer District Board of Directors
Meets the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of each month at 9:30 a.m. at the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors’ Chambers, 700 H Street, Sacramento
Background Information: SacSewer is the sewage collection, treatment, and resource recovery utility serving the Sacramento region, providing service to over 1.6 million residents. It is governed by a 17-member Board of Directors, which includes ﬁve members from the Sacramento Board of Supervisors, ﬁve members from the Sacramento City Council, two council members from the City

Page 15 of 147 ends

ITEM 3.1. ATTACHMENT 2
4 of Elk Grove, and one representative each from Yolo County and the cities of Citrus Heights, Folsom, Rancho Cordova, and West Sacramento. Source: www.sacsewer.com Council Member(s):

David Sander, Appointee (2021-present)
Joe Little, Alternate (01/01/2024-present)
Contact:

Sunny Kenner, Executive Secretary, [email protected] Christoph Dobson, General Manager

Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission Board of Directors Meets quarterly in March, June, September and December at 2:30 p.m. at the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors’ Chambers, 700 H Street, Sacramento Background Information: The Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission is responsible for the following: overseeing State-issued franchises for cable video services in Sacramento County, assisting consumers with cable/video-related issues and concerns, managing the operations of Metro Cable 14, collecting and distributing franchise and PEG fee revenues, monitoring the use of PEG fee funds, and overseeing community programming and the funding of Channel Licensees that support six community channels on the local cable system.

The Commission is a joint powers agency representing seven member jurisdictions: the County of Sacramento and the cities of Sacramento, Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Rancho Cordova, Folsom, and Galt. Source: https://sacmetrocable.saccounty.gov/
Council Member(s):

Siri Pulipati, Appointee (2023-present)
Garrett Gatewood, Alternate (2023-present)
Contact:

Lydia Frazier, Commission Clerk, [email protected] Shawn Ayala, Executive Director

Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District Board of Trustees Meets the 3rd Tuesday of each month at 10:00 a.m. at Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District Office, 8631 Bond Road, Elk Grove
Background Information: In 1915, the California Legislature passed the “Mosquito Abatement Act” to help protect public health from the risks associated with mosquitoes. On June 18, 1946, the Sacramento County-Yolo County Mosquito Abatement District was established. In July 1990, the District Board voted to change the name to better reﬂect its expanded services, which now include control of ticks, yellow jackets, and other vectors. The District’s mission is to provide safe, effective, and cost-efficient mosquito and vector control for Sacramento and Yolo counties, aiming to protect public health from diseases transmitted by mosquitoes, such as West Nile virus, malaria, and others. The two counties together cover 2,013 square miles of urban, commercial, and agricultural

Page 16 of 147 ends

ITEM 3.1. ATTACHMENT 2
5 land. The District is governed by a Board of Trustees, with each trustee representing one of the incorporated cities or counties within the District’s boundaries. Trustees are appointed to their positions. Source: www.ﬁghtthebite.net
Council Member(s):

Robert McGarvey, Appointee (2007-present)
David Sander, Alternate (2007-present)
Contact:

Catalina Garcia, Administrative Assistant, cgarcia@ﬁghtthebite.net Gary Goodman, Manager

South Sacramento Conservation Agency Joint Powers Authority Meets the last Monday of every other month at 11:00 a.m. at Sacramento County Board of Supervisors’ Chambers, 700 H Street, Sacramento
Background Information: T he South Sacramento Conservation Agency – Joint Powers Authority is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan (SSHCP). This includes acquiring land or easements to establish the SSHCP preserve system, carrying out restoration efforts for species habitats and aquatic resources, developing management and monitoring plans to sustain the preserve system, and ensuring compliance with the SSHCP’s conditions and related permits. Additionally, the Agency is tasked with setting and adjusting fees, approving the Agency's annual report, and approving its annual budget. Source:
https://sccob.saccounty.gov/Pages/South-Sacramento-Conservation-Agency.aspx Council Member(s):

Linda Budge (2011-present) and Garrett Gatewood (2018-present), Appointees Joe Little (1/1/2025-present) and Siri Pulipati (2021-present), Alternates Contact:

Florence Evans, Clerk, [email protected]

Greater Sacramento Economic Council Board of Directors
Typically meets quarterly from 9-11 a.m.

Background Information: The Greater Sacramento Economic Council is dedicated to connecting with national and regional audiences. Its Board of Directors includes representatives from local governments, business leaders, and various other stakeholders. Source:
https://www.greatersacramento.com/
Council Member(s):

Siri Pulipati (1/1/2025–present), Appointee
Garrett Gatewood (1/1/2025–present), Alternate
Contact:

Barry Broome, President and CEO

Page 17 of 147 ends

ITEM 3.1. ATTACHMENT 2
6 Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo)
Meets the 1st Wednesday of each month at 5:30 p.m. at Sacramento County Board of Supervisors’ Chambers, 700 H Street, Sacramento
Background Information: L AFCo is a countywide commission mandated in every California county.

Its purpose is to promote the organized creation of local government agencies, protect agricultural and open spaces, and prevent urban sprawl. By law, commissions are required to prepare Municipal Service Reviews and update Spheres of Inﬂuence for each independent local government jurisdiction within their county. Source: https://saclafco.saccounty.gov Council Member(s):

According to the rotation schedule, it is anticipated City of Rancho Cordova representation will resume again from January 2033-December 2034.

Contact:

Commission Clerk, [email protected]
Jose C. Henriquez, Executive Director

Sacramento Public Library Authority Governing Board of Directors Meets the 4th Thursday of each month at 3:00 p.m. at the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors’ Chambers, 700 H Street, Sacramento
Background Information: T he Sacramento Public Library Authority is governed by a joint powers agreement between the County of Sacramento and the cities of Citrus Heights, Isleton, Elk Grove, Rancho Cordova, and Sacramento. Its mission is to provide public library services that offer open access to a wide range of resources and ideas, inspiring learning, promoting reading, and enriching community life for all residents in the member jurisdictions. The Sacramento Public Library is the fourth-largest library system in California, with 28 locations serving 1.4 million people.

The Board is made up of representatives from each member jurisdiction, with seats allocated based on population. It includes all ﬁve members of the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors, ﬁve council members from the City of Sacramento, two members from the City of Elk Grove, and one member from the city councils of Citrus Heights and Rancho Cordova. The cities of Galt and Isleton are jointly represented by a single council member. The Library Director serves as the CEO of the Authority and acts as the secretary of the governing board. Source: www.saclibrary.org Council Member(s):

Joe Little, Appointee (1/1/2025 –present)
Linda Budge, Alternate (2019-present)
Contact:

Heather Wilde, Clerk to the Board, [email protected] Peter Coyl, Library Director and CEO

Page 18 of 147 ends

ITEM 3.1. ATTACHMENT 2
7 Lower American River Conservancy Programs Advisory Committee Meets as needed
Background Information: T he Lower American River Conservancy Program was established by Assembly Bill 1716, which took effect on January 1, 2017. The Program was designed to create a state partner that works in collaboration with local agencies, particularly the County of Sacramento in its role as the manager of the American River Parkway, as well as nonproﬁt organizations. Its purpose is to help fund projects and provide grants aimed at restoring, enhancing, interpreting, protecting, and improving public access to the Parkway’s natural, recreational, educational, and cultural resources. is responsible for reviewing eligible projects and making funding recommendations. The Committee is required to meet at least twice annually in Sacramento County, and its meetings are open to the public. The Committee is composed of 12 members.

Source: www.wcb.ca.gov
Council Member(s):

Joe Little, Appointee (1/1/2025 – present)
Garrett Gatewood, Alternate (2018 – present)
Contact:

Cara Allen, Senior Environmental Scientist, [email protected]

Folsom Lake College Philanthropy Council
Background Information:

Council Member(s):

Siri Pulipati, Appointee (2021-present)
Contact:

City Selection Committee of Sacramento County
Meets as needed
Background Information: T he City Selection Committee of Sacramento County (referred to as "The Committee") is made up of the mayors from each incorporated city within the county, in accordance with Sections 50270 – 50279.2 of the California Government Code. The Committee’s role is to appoint city representatives to various boards, commissions, and agencies as mandated by law. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors serves as the Ex-Officio Clerk to the Committee.

Source: https://sccob.saccounty.gov/Pages/CitySelectionCommittee.aspx Council Member(s):

Siri Pulipati, Appointee (1/1/2025-present) – Concurrent with Mayoral term Contact:

Florence Evans, Clerk, [email protected]

Page 19 of 147 ends

ITEM 3.1. ATTACHMENT 2
8 Sacramento County Criminal Justice Cabinet Executive Committee Meets quarterly in January, April, July, and October
Background Information: T he principal mission of the Cabinet is to study the Sacramento County juvenile and criminal justice system, identify deﬁciencies, formulate policy and programs for change when opportunities present themselves. In addition, its mission is to communicate and present planning, ﬁnancial, operational, managerial, and programmatic recommendations to the agencies represented on the Cabinet. The Mayor of each incorporated city sits on the board in addition to other County designated officials. Source: https://dce.saccounty.gov/Public-Safety- and-Justice/CriminalJusticeCabinet/Pages/default.aspx
Council Member(s):

Siri Pulipati, Appointee (1/1/2025-present) – Concurrent with Mayoral term Joe Little, Alternate (1/1/2025-present)
Designee: Chief of Police
Contact:

Catherine York, Management Analyst, [email protected]

Sacramento Homeless Policy Council
Meets quarterly at 9:00 a.m. with ongoing discussion and collaboration between community leaders and staff continuing year-round.

Background Information: T he Sacramento Homeless Policy Council (SHPC) was established to foster regional collaboration in the effort to end homelessness. The SHPC convened for the ﬁrst time on August 27, 2021, to initiate broad, strategic discussions aimed at addressing the homelessness crisis in Sacramento. Current members include elected officials from Sacramento County and the cities of Sacramento, Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom, Galt, and Rancho Cordova.

Additionally, the SHPC includes leaders from key coordinating bodies within the homeless response system, such as the Chair of the Continuum of Care (CoC) and the Chair of the CoC’s lead agency, Sacramento Steps Forward. Source:
https://sacramentostepsforward.org/sacramento-homeless-policy-council-2/ Council Member(s):

Joe Little, Appointee (1/1/2025 – present)
Garrett Gatewood, Alternate (1/1/2025 – present)
Contact:

Lisa Bates, Chief Executive Officer, [email protected]

Page 20 of 147 ends

ITEM 3.1. ATTACHMENT 2
9 Ad-hoc Committees

Ad-hoc committees are temporary groups formed to address speciﬁc issues or tasks that arise unexpectedly. These committees meet as needed, convening only for the duration of the project or problem they are assigned to resolve.

Sacramento County Designees: Siri Pulipati, Garrett Gatewood Elk Grove Uniﬁed School District Designees: Siri Pulipati, Garrett Gatewood Folsom Cordova Uniﬁed School District Designees: David Sander, Linda Budge Sacramento City Uniﬁed School District Designees: Garrett Gatewood, Joe Little Golden State Water Company Designees: Davd Sander, Linda Budge Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District Designees: Siri Pulipati, Linda Budge Gateway Signage Designees: David Sander, Linda Budge Growing Strong Neighborhoods Designees: David Sander, Joe Little Cordova Recreation and Park District Designees: Siri Pulipati, Garrett Gatewood Rancho Cordova Technology and Innovation Designees: Siri Pulipati, Garrett Gatewood

Page 21 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.1. ATTACHMENT 1

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, December 16, 2024
5:30 PM – Regular Meeting
David B. Roberts Council Chambers
City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova

DRAFT MINUTES

1. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

Mayor Sander called the Regular meeting to order in the David B. Roberts Council Chambers at 5:34 p.m.

Council Members Present: Linda Budge, Garrett Gatewood, Siri Pulipati, Donald Terry, and Mayor David Sander
Council Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Stacy Leitner, Adam Lindgren, Persephonie Riley, and Micah Runner

2. METRO CABLE TV TELEVISION ANNOUNCEMENT

The City Clerk read the meetings recordings and playback schedule.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Ken Cooley and Bob McGarvey led the pledge.

4. INVOCATION

Chaplain Tammy Hartman with the Law Enforcement Chaplaincy Sacramento gave the invocation.

5. CERTIFICATION OF THE NOVEMBER 5, 2024, GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION

5.1. Subject: A Resolution Certifying the Results of the November 5, 2024, General Municipal Election with Regard to Three Members of the City Council.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

Page 22 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, December 16, 2024

Page 2 of 4 ends

Mayor Sander opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Sander closed the public comment period.

ACTION: Motion to approve item 5.1. by Terry second by Budge; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.

6. SPECIAL CEREMONIES - SWEAR IN COUNCIL MEMBERS

6.1. Swearing-in and Seating of Council Members.

7. SELECTION OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR

7.1. Subject: Selection of the 2025 Mayor and Vice Mayor.

Recommendation: Council selection of the 2025 Mayor and Vice Mayor.

Mayor Sander opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Sander closed the public comment period.

ACTION: Motion to appoint Garrett Gatewood as Vice Mayor and Siri Pulipati as Mayor by Budge second by Sander;
Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.

8. SPECIAL CEREMONIES - SWEAR IN MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR

8.1. Swearing in of Vice Mayor.

8.2. Swearing in of Mayor.

8.3. Presentation to Outgoing Mayor Sander.

9. CELEBRATORY BREAK

6:05 p.m. - 6:35 p.m.

10. PRESENTATIONS

None.

11. PUBLIC COMMENT

Mayor Pulipati opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:

1. Lara Popyack

2. YK Chalamchella

3. Abirami Duraiswamy
Mayor Pulipati closed the public comment period.

12. COUNCIL REPORTS

Council reported on events since the last meeting.

13. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

City Manager Micah Runner gave his report.

14. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE

Mayor Pulipati opened the public comment period. Seeing no speakers, Mayor Pulipati closed the public comment period.

Page 23 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, December 16, 2024

Page 3 of 4 ends

ACTION: Motion to approve items 14.1 through 14.4 by Budge second by Sander; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.

14.1. Subject: Meeting Minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting of December 2, 2024.

Recommendation: Adopt the minutes.

14.2. Subject: A Resolution Approving the Final Map of The Preserve - Phase 2, Subdivision No. FM-24-0044, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Subdivision Improvement Agreement No. 2024-275 with Lennar Homes of California, LLC.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

14.3. Subject: A Resolution Declaring the Results of the Mail Ballot Election Relating to the Imposition of the Annual Stormwater Utility Fee (SWUII) on the Sunridge Park III Project in the City of Rancho Cordova.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution declaring the results of the mail ballot election relating to the imposition of the annual Stormwater Utility Fee (SWUII) on the Sunridge Park III project.

14.4. Subject: A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Contract No. 2024-277 and Authorizing Execution of a Purchase and Sale of Easements, Licenses and Fee Interest, Certificate of Acceptance, and Recordation of a Grant Deed Related to Raymer Way Improvements.

Recommendation: Adopt the Resolution.

15. CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS - ROLL CALL VOTE

None.

16. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

None.

17. REGULAR CALENDAR ITEMS

17.1. Subject: Discussion and Approval of Council Member Appointments to Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees.

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council review the direction provided on Council appointments to regional boards and commissions and local committees and provide direction for any changes.

Mayor Pulipati opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:

1. James Garcia

Mayor Pulipati closed the public comment period.

ACTION: Motion to approve item 17.1. with updates by Budge second by Gatewood; Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.

17.2. Subject: Discussion of the Planning Commission Selection and Appointment Process.

Recommendation: Receive a report on the current process for selection and appointment of regular Planning Commission Members, with a recommendation from staff to maintain the existing process as outlined in Chapter 2.30 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code. Upon conclusion of the discussion, the City Council could concur with staff's recommendation or direct staff to make changes to Chapter 2.30 regarding the selection and appointment process of regular Planning Commission Members.

Page 24 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Rancho Cordova City Council - DRAFT MINUTES
Meeting of Monday, December 16, 2024

Page 4 of 4 ends

Mayor Pulipati opened the public comment period. The following individuals addressed the Council or submitted public comment via email:

1. Jim Garcia

2. Sara Malone

3. James Garcia

4. Helen Whelan-Bashaw

5. Sergio Diaz
Mayor Pulipati closed the public comment period.

ACTION: Motion to select option 1, to continue with the existing qualification that a regular Planning Commission Member resides within the boundaries of the City limits, nominated by an individual City Council Member and confirmed by a majority vote, for the Planning Commission Selection and Appointment Process by Budge second by Gatewood;
Motion passed with a 5:0 vote.

18. COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

1. Discussion and Potential Removal of a Planning Commission Member.

19. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Pulipati adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m.
__________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 25 of 147 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 4

ITEM 13.2.

DATE: January 6, 2025

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Michelle Mingay, Finance Manager
Kim Juran, Administrative Services Director

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND

DETERMINATIONS RELATED TO, AND ACCEPTING, THE FISCAL
YEAR 2023-24 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FOR
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1600 DEVELOPMENT FEES

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would approve the annual Development Impact Fee Report prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and ensure the City remains in compliance with AB1600 reporting requirements.

BACKGROUND

State law (California Government Code Section 66006) requires each local agency that imposes AB 1600 development impact fees to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees. AB 1600's legal requirements stipulate that the fees imposed on new development have the proper nexus to any project on which they are imposed. In addition, AB 1600 imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected.

The fees, for accounting purposes, must be segregated from the general fund of the City and from other funds or accounts containing fees collected for other improvements. Interest on each development fee fund or account must be credited to that fund or account and used only for the purposes for which the fees were collected.

California Government Code Section 66006(b) requires that for each separate account or fund, the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of the fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:
- A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. - The amount of the fee.
- The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.

Page 26 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 4
- The amount of the fees collected and interest earned. - An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.
- An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement. - A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
- The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded.

California Government Code Section 66001(d) requires the local agency make all of following findings every fifth year with respect to that portion of the account remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted:
- Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
- Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which it is charged. - Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements.
- Designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
- In any action imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local agency, the local agency shall determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

If the agency no longer needs the funds for the purposes collected, or if the agency fails to make required finding, or perform certain administrative tasks prescribed by AB 1600, the agency may be required to refund, on a prorated basis to owners of the properties upon which the fees for the improvement were imposed, the monies collected for that project and any interest earned on those funds.

The report must be reviewed by the City Council at a regularly scheduled public meeting, not less than 15 days after the information is made available to the public. In addition, notice of the time and place of the meeting shall be mailed at least 15 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who files a written request with the local agency for such a mailed notice, of which the City has none. The report was posted to the City’s website and available for public review on December 10, 2024.

Page 27 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 4
The FY 2023-24 Development Impact Fee Report has been prepared to include both the annual and most of the five-year requirements for the City, with the other five-year requirements being met in the Resolution. It should also be noted that the Report includes fees that were in place on June 30, 2024, and does not necessarily represent current fee levels since any fee adjustments after June 30th will be captured in the FY 2024-25 Development Impact Fee Report.

Currently, the City has seven different impact fee programs as described in the Report; the Community Facility Fee Program, Sunrise Douglas Fee Program, Traffic Mitigation Impact Fee Program, Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program, Measure A - Transportation Improvement Impact Fee, Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) Impact Fee, Housing Development Impact Fee and the Suncreek Specific Plan Fee Program.

The Community Facility Fee (CFF) Program was updated in April 2013 and combined fee components from the City’s 2004 and 2005 Fee Studies into a single fee category while continuing to report the library fee separately. Additionally, both the Sunrise Douglas and the Villages of Zinfandel fee programs were modified to allow the CFF Library Fee to be collected in lieu of collecting individual library fees for these areas. Both the facilities and the library components have funds that have been held beyond the five-year period as described in AB1600. The facilities component has accumulated funds totaling $15.9M, of which $1,154,279 are beyond the five-year period while the library has held a total of $4,056,283 beyond the five- year period. These funds are being accumulated for the construction or rehabilitation of community facilities and must be retained until sufficient fees have been collected to start construction. It is anticipated the facilities component will be expended on the Mills Station project in the near future while funds are still being accumulated to be used towards the construction of a new library within the City boundaries.

The Sunrise Douglas Fee Program has multiple components, with two of the components with a combined total of $7,428,363, which have held funds beyond the five-year period as described in AB1600. These components include Roadway ($6,724,429) and Program Admin ($703,934), which are accumulating funds for facilities/services that either i) have not reached a population which requires the construction of the facility or ii) have not accumulated enough funding to construct the facility.

The Transportation Impact Fee Program has held $4,465,160 beyond the five-year period as described in AB1600. This amount is down significantly from the last time the five-year finding was adopted, were the program had reported a total of $10,086,442 in funds being held. This program is accumulating funds for major construction projects that either i) have not reached a population which requires the construction of the facilities or ii) have not accumulated enough funding to construct the facility (like the Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange, estimated to cost $100,000,000 and International Drive from Sunrise Blvd to Rancho Cordova Parkway Loop, estimated to cost $57,688,000).

The Sacramento Regional Transit Impact Fee Program established to provide funding for public facilities to serve the City, which facilities are described in the Sacramento Regional Transit expenditure plan and nexus study. The SacRT impact fee is collected by the City and remitted to the Sacramento Regional Transit District, which administers the program. This program has held a total of $93,678 in funding beyond the five-year period as described in AB1600.

The Housing Trust Development Impact Fee is a non-residential impact fee used to offset some of the increased burden of need for very low-income housing, created by the construction of non-residential uses, which employ a significant number of low wage earners. This program has

Page 28 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 4 of 4
held a total of $37,401 beyond the five-year period as described in AB1600. These funds are being accumulated to assist in the construction of future low income housing.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

Ongoing compliance with AB 1600 reporting requirements will allow the City to continue to collect fees from developers to ensure that new development is providing new infrastructure or funds to ensure that their impact upon the City is funded by the development, not by existing residents.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Rancho Cordova Development Impact Fee Report

Page 29 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2025 Page 1 of 4

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS RELATED TO, AND ACCEPTING, THE FY 2023-24 PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REPORT FOR THE AB 1600 DEVELOPMENT FEES
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova imposes fees to mitigate the impacts of development, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq.; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 66006(a), the City has established and maintained separate funds for each development impact fee in a manner to avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the City, except for temporary investments, and has expended those fees solely for the purpose for which the fees were collected; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 66006(b)(1) requires cities to prepare and make available to the public a report describing each development impact fee and providing details related to its use within one hundred eighty (180) days after the last day of each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 66001(d) also requires cities to prepare a report every fifth fiscal year following the first deposit of development impact fees, and every five years thereafter. Cities are required to make findings with respect to the funds collected and that portion of the funds remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted; and
WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Report, for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2024, (the “Report”), attached hereto as Exhibit A, provides a description of each fee, its amount, and various information required by Government Code Section 66006(b)(1) to be reported on an annual basis and also provides the information required by Government Code Section 66001(d) for five year reports; and
WHEREAS, the Report provides information required by Government Code Sections 66001 and 66006 for the following approved development impact fees:
▪Community Facilities Fee Program: On April 1, 2013, the City Council approved Resolution No. 38-2013 updating the Community Facilities Fee Program, which was originally established in 2004 and updated in 2005, to fund a portion of the future municipal facilities required to serve an increased City population due to anticipated future development; and
▪Sunrise Douglas Community Plan Development Impact Fees: On June 21, 2004, the City Council approved Resolution No. 79-2004 establishing the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan Development Impact Fee Program to finance the required roadways, transit shuttle, supplemental offsite water, interim sewer, park and library facilities necessary to service development in the Sunridge Specific Plan, as well as defray the cost of periodic updated to and routine administration of the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan Development Fee Program; and

Page 30 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2025 Page 2 of 4
▪Transportation Development Impact Fee Program: On December 19, 2005, the City Council approved Ordinance 33-2005 establishing a Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Program to finance transportation improvements necessary to offset the impacts to the City’s transportation system of new development in the City, to ensure that adequate funding is provided for improvements required to meet the demands of such new development, and to fund administration of the Fee Program. An update to the TDIF was approved by the City Council on January 22, 2013, with the approval of Resolution 7-2013; and ▪Measure A Transportation Improvement Fee Program: On January 9, 2009, the City Council approved Ordinance 1-2009 establishing the Measure A Transportation Improvement Fee Program, to allow development projects to pay their fair share of costs of the Measure A transportation improvements planned within in the City or that will benefit the City, as outlined in the Measure A nexus study prepared by the Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) and adopted by the City Council with Resolution 04-2009. The City collects and remits the impact fees to the STA who is then responsible for programing and expending the funds on an annual basis, and ▪Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) Development Impact Fee Program: On April 2, 2018, the City Council approved Ordinance 5-2018 establishing the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) Development Impact Fee Program, as outlined in the Sacramento County Roadway and Transit Development Fee Analysis and the Sacramento Consolidated Roadway and Transit Capital Improvement Programs adopted by the City Council with Resolution 38-2018.

The City collects and remits the impact fees to SacRT who is then responsible for programing and expending the funds on an annual basis, and ▪Housing Trust Development Impact Fee: On December 1, 2003, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 26-2003 continuing the Housing Trust Development Impact Fee in effect when the City incorporated, which is to be used to finance municipal public facilities to reduce the impacts caused by future developments in the Rancho Cordova area on the housing stock, including but not limited to very low income housing facilities; and
▪SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fees: On May 16, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 77-2022 establishing the SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fees to ensure that all facilities necessary to service development within the SunCreek Specific Plan area are capable of being provided within a reasonable amount of time.

WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 66006(b)(2) requires that the governing body of the City review the information made available to the public at a regularly scheduled public meeting not less than 15 days after the information is made available to the public; and
WHEREAS, the Report was made available to the public on the City's website on December 19, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on January 6, 2025, the City Council reviewed the report and approved it pursuant to Government Code Sections 66001 and 66006.

Page 31 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2025 Page 3 of 4

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA as follows:

Section 1.The City Council does hereby find and determine that the foregoing recitals and determinations are true and correct, and does hereby incorporate by reference the Development Impact Fee Report, for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2024, as Exhibit A.

Section 2.The City Council has reviewed the Report and finds that it complies with California Government Code Section 66006(b), setting the requirements for fiscal year reporting for development impact fees. The City Council finds that the Report provides the following required information:

A. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund (Report pg. 4-7); B. The amount of the fee (Report pg. 8-12);
C. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund (Report pg. 13-18); D. The amount of the fees collected, and interest earned (Report pg. 19-38); E. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees (Report pg. 39-41); F. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement (Report pg. 42-44);
G. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan (Report pg. 39-40); and H. The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded (Report pg. 40).

Section 3.The City Council further finds that the nexus studies and ordinances or resolutions adopting the above listed development impact fees, which describe the purpose(s) for which the fees were collected and the nexus between the fees and purpose for which the fees are charged, are still valid and are still the purpose for which the fees will be used. This finding, along with the Report, satisfies the requirements of California Government Code Section 66001(d) for a five-year report. The Nexus studies, this Resolution and the Report provide the following information:

A. The purpose to which the fee is to be put;
B. A reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which it is charged; C. All sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements;
D. Designates the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund; and

Page 32 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2025 Page 4 of 4
E. For any action imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by the City, the nexus studies, this Resolution and the Report demonstrate that there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

Section 4.The City Council hereby finds that all reportable fees, collections and expenditures have been received, deposited, invested and expended in compliance with the relevant sections of the California Government Code and all other applicable laws for the fiscal year 2023-24.

Section 5.The City Council hereby finds that no refunds and allocations of reportable fees, as required by California Government Code Section 66001, are deemed payable at this time.

Section 6.The City Council hereby finds the City is in compliance with California Government Code Section 66000, et seq., relative to receipt, deposit, investment, expenditure or refund of reportable fees received and expended relative to the individual impact fee programs in place for new development in fiscal year 2023-24.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of January 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Siri Pulipati, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 33 of 147 ends

City of Rancho Cordova
Development
Impact Fee
Report
Public Review Draft
Fiscal Year Ending
June 30, 2024
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 34 of 147 ends

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report

Table of Contents

Legal Requirement ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 1 Description of Development Impact Fee(s) ................................ ................................ ............. 4 Current Fee Schedule ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 8 Development Impact Fee Reports
Financial Summary Report - Current Year Activity .......................................................... 13 Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Change in Fund Balance Community Facility Fee (CFF) Impact Fee Program
Community Facilities ....................................................................................................... 19 Library ................................................................................................................................. 20 Sunrise Douglas (SD) Impact Fee Program
Interim Sewer ..................................................................................................................... 21 Supplemental Offsite Water ........................................................................................ 22 Roadway ............................................................................................................................. 23 Program Administration ................................................................................................ 24 Traffic Mitigation Impact Fee Program ........................................................................ 25 Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program
Drainage Facilities ........................................................................................................... 26 Administration ................................................................................................................. 27 Measure A Transportation Improvement Fee Program ................................................. 28 Sacramento Regional Transit Fee Program ………………………………………………………………..29 Housing Trust Development Impact Fee Program .......................................................... 30 SunCreek Specific Plan Impact Fee Program
Onsite Roadway .................................................................................................................. 31 Offsite Roadway ................................................................................................................ 32 Potable Water ..................................................................................................................... 33 Storm Drainage ................................................................................................................. 34 Backbone Wetland Mitigation ....................................................................................... 35 Parks, Corridors & Trails ................................................................................................. 36 Wetland Preserve Buffer .................................................................................................. 37 Plan Administration .......................................................................................................... 38 Notes to the Annual Development Impact Fee Report ................................ ....................... 39 Development Fee Project Identification ................................ ................................ ................... 41 Resolution No. XX-2024 ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 45 ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 35 of 147 ends

~ 1 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Legal Requirements
A. REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
State law (California Government Code Section 66006) requires each local agency that imposes AB 1600 development impact fees to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees. Within the AB1600 legal requirements, it stipulates that fees imposed on new development have the proper nexus to any project on which they are imposed. In addition, AB1600 imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected. The fees, for accounting purposes, must be segregated from the general funds of the City and from other funds or accounts containing fees collected for other improvements. Interest on each development fee fund or account must be credited to that fund or account and used only for the purposes for which the fees were collected.

Current California Government Code Section 66006(b) requires that for each separate fund the local agency shall, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for the fiscal year:
• A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. • The amount of the fee.
• The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund. • The amount of the fees collected and interest earned. • An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees. • An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement. • A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan. • The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded.

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 36 of 147 ends

~ 2 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
• Designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
• In any action imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local agency, the local agency shall determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

B. ADDITIONAL NOTES
The State of California Government Code Section 66002 requires local agencies that have developed a fee program to adopt a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) indicating the approximate location, size and timing of projects, plus an estimate for the cost of all facilities or improvements to be financed by fees. A formal CIP is recommended, at a minimum, as a five-year plan. The City annually produces a five -year CIP which provides program summary information for the City’s various capital improvement funding programs, as well as project summary information (revenue, expenditures and project schedule) for the specific projects selected for implementation during the CIP period. The CIP describes the five -year plan for allocating funds from the Impact Fee Programs, Measure A Transportation Sales Tax, State and Federal Grants, Gas Tax, Roadway Funds, Supplemental Transportation Fees, Storm Water Utility Tax and Transit Related Service Area Tax. A copy of the City’s most recent CIP was adopted as part of the biennial budget document and can be found under the Finance Department page on the City’s website at www.cityofranchocordova.org.

The CIP relates the City’s annual capital expenditures to a long -range plan for public improvements. By relating the plan for public improvements to the City’s capacity for funding, and scheduling expenditures over a period of years, the CIP helps maximize the funds available. This type of fiscal management is important during periods where budgetary demands exceeding financial resources.

C. ESTABLISHING A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FEE AND THE PURPOSE

FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED
The Development Impact Fee Program has been in effect in Rancho Cordova since incorporation in fiscal year 2003/04. The Development Impact Fee Program consists of multiple components which were individually adopted by the City Council. The program sets forth the relationship between contemplated future development, facilities needed to serve future development and the estimated costs of those improvements based on the current General Plan for build-out.

The City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects are financed, in part, by the development impact fees outlined in the description of the development impact fees on the following pages. The City’s CIP provide infrastructure to the residents and businesses in Rancho Cordova in order to keep pace with ongoing development in, and adjacent to, the community. Estimated project costs, and the summary of fee apportionment to each ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 37 of 147 ends

~ 3 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
development fee type, are detailed within the adopted Nexus Studies establishing the individual Development Impact Fee program(s) and are on file with the City Clerk’s Office.

Information on projects in the Development Impact Fee Program(s) can be found on pages 28-30. The information in these tables include: Current Projects, Project Phase, Construction Estimated Start Date, Construction Estimated Completion Date, Estimated Project Cost and Development Fee information including Funding to Date, Budget to Date and % of Total Project Cost.

D. FUNDING OF INFRASTRUCTURE
The 2020/21 - 2024/25 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) identifies all funding sources and amounts for individual projects through 20 24/25. The CIP is updated annually to reflect the current infrastructure needs of the City. As a CIP project is identified, the project is evaluated to determine the portion of the project that will service existing residents and businesses versus new development.

Once the determination of use is made, the percentage of use attributable to new development is then funded by the appropriate development fee, based on the type of project. The percentage of use associated with existing residents or businesses are funded from other appropriate sources as identified on each individual project sheet in the CIP. All future planned infrastructure needs are outlined in the Development Impact Fee Program(s).

The funding and commencement dates for projects are adjusted, as needed, to reflect the needs of the community.

E. CURRENT PROJECTS
Construction is currently underway on the following projects:

• 80040 – Chrysanthy Blvd Phase II
• 80075 – Rancho Cordova City Hall – Suite 220 Renovation

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 38 of 147 ends

~ 4 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Description of Development Impact Fee(s)
Community Facilities Fee (CFF) Program – This program was established by the City to cover the costs of municipal facilities required to serve an increased population as a result of new development. The city has identified these facilities to include a city hall, a police station, a community center, a city corporation yard, a city museum, a parking structure, library facilities and ongoing administration of the CFF program. The fee program was updated in April 2013 and combined fee components from the City’s 2004 and 2005 Fee Studies into a single fee category while continuing to report the library fee separately since the City is holding these funds on behalf of the Sacramento Public Library Authority.

Community Facilities Impact Fee – To provide for new development’s share of the cost of municipal facilities, furnishing and equipment required to service the City.

Library Impact Fee – To provide for new development’s share of the cost of a library building, furnishings, equipment, books, financing, and the purchase of land.

Sunrise Douglas (SD) Impact Fee Program – These specific plan development impact fees are imposed on development in the Sunridge Specific Plan (SRSP), which is part of the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan (SDCP) development area. It includes additional fees for fee program updates, interim sewer facilities, park development improvements, supplemental offsite water facilities, roadways improvements, transit shuttles, and administration of the fee program. These funds can only be spent on facilities in the SDCP Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to mitigate impact as a result of development in the SDCP area.

SD Interim Sewer Impact Fee – To p
rovide funding for the construction of interim sewer
facilities to serve the SRSP area. Upon application by the property owner or his authorized agent, the City may authorize the construction of any interim sewer facilities, or portions thereof, as designated in the SDCP Impact Fee Program in lieu of all, or a portion of, the required interim sewer development fee.

SD Supplemental Offsite Water Impact Fee – To provide funding for the construction of offsite water improvements to serve the SRSP area. Upon application by the property owner or his authorized agent, the City may authorize the construction of any offsite water facilities, or portions thereof, as designated in the SDCP Impact Fee Program in lieu of all, or a portion of, the supplemental offsite water development fee.

SD Roadway Impact Fee – To p rovide funding to construct roads, intersections, and other roadway improvements in the SDCP CIP needed to mitigate the impacts of new development within the SRSP area. Upon application by the property owner or his authorized agent, the City may authorize the construction of any roadway facilities, or portions thereof, in order of priority as designated on the priority list in the SD Impact Fee Program. The developer will then either be reimbursed for these costs from fees collected from other developers in the SDCP area, only to the extent the funds are available, or a credit for such in lieu construction will be provide to the property owner to be used within the SDCP area.

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 39 of 147 ends

~ 5 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
SD Administration Impact Fee – To provide funding for the administrative duties associated with the SD Impact Fee program.

Traffic Mitigation Impact Fee – This development impact fee is a citywide fee imposed on new development in the City to cover the fair share cost of traffic impacts resulting from new development, including program administration. The funds collected will be used for construction of the transportation improvements listed in the Transportation Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Development Impact Fee Program.

Upon application by the property owner or his authorized agent, the City may authorize the c
onstruction of any transportation facilities, or portions thereof, in order of priority as designated on the priority list for the transportation impact fee program. The developer will then either be reimbursed for these costs from fees collected from other developers, only to the extent the funds are available, or a credit in lieu of all, or a portion of the required transportation impact fee.

Storm Drain age Impact Fee Program – This development impact fee is a citywide fee imposed on new development in the City to cover the fair share cost of major drainage facilities, including program administration.

Storm Drainage – Facilities Fee – All development that contributes to stormwater runoff to the public drainage system is required to pay a drainage impact fee to offset the cost of trunk and regional drainage facilities necessitated by development. Upon application by the property owner or his authorized agent, the City may authorize the construction of any major drainage facility designated in the Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program. If the approved facility is sized to serve more than just the property owners project or if the facility will serve a regional purpose, the developer may qualify for fee credits. The credits are not intended to fully compensate developers for the drainage facilities.

Storm Drainage
– Administration Fee – To provide funding for the administrative duties associated with the Storm Drainage Impact Fee program.

Measure A – Transportation Improvement Impact Fee – A impact fee established to provide funding for public facilities to serve the City, which facilities are described in the Measure A expenditure plan and the Measure A nexus study. The Measure A impact fee is collected by the City and remitted to the Sacramento Transportation Authority, which administers the countywide Measure A program.

Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) Impact Fee – A impact fee established to provide funding for public facilities to serve the City, which facilities are described in the Sacramento Regional Transit expenditure plan and nexus study. The SacRT impact fee is collected by the City and remitted to the Sacramento Regional Transit District, which administers the program.

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 40 of 147 ends

~ 6 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Housing Trust Development Impact Fee – A non-residential impact fee used to offset some of the increased burden of need for very low -income housing, created by the construction of non-residential uses, which employ a significant number of low wage earners.

SunCreek Specific Plan (SCSP) Impact Fee Program - The SunCreek Specific Plan (SCSP) Development Impact Fees are imposed on development within the SCSP area in Rancho Cordova. These fees provide funding for the construction and improvement of critical infrastructure and public facilities to mitigate the impacts of new development. The SCSP Impact Fee Program includes fees for on -site roadways, off -site roadways, water infrastructure, storm drainage, wetland mitigation, park corridors and trails, wetland preserve buffers, plan area formation, and program administration. These funds are restricted to projects identified in the SCSP Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).

SCSP On -Si
te Roadway Impact Fee - This fee funds the construction of on -site roadways, intersections, traffic signals, and other associated improvements within the SCSP area. Developers may construct designated on-site roadway facilities in lieu of paying all or part of the fee. In such cases, developers may receive either reimbursement for their costs from fees collected from other developers or credits applicable to their development.

SCSP O ff-Si
te Roadway Impact Fee - This fee funds the construction of on -site roadways, intersections, traffic signals, and other associated improvements within the SCSP area. Developers may construct designated on-site roadway facilities in lieu of paying all or part of the fee. In such cases, developers may receive either reimbursement for their costs from fees collected from other developers or credits applicable to their development.

SCSP Potable Water Impact Fee -
This fee funds the construction of water
transmission and distribution infrastructure to provide potable water service to the SCSP area. Developers may apply to construct designated water facilities in lieu of paying all or part of the fee. Eligible costs may qualify for reimbursement or fee credits.

SCSP Storm Drainage Impact Fee -The Storm Drainage Impact Fee funds facilities required to manage increased runoff resulting from SCSP development. These include detention basins and other infrastructure. Developers constructing eligible drainage facilities may receive reimbursement or credits for their contributions.

SCSP Wetland Mitigation Impact Fee - This fee supports compliance with the South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) by funding mitigation for wetlands disturbed during development. Developers constructing eligible mitigation facilities may be reimbursed or receive fee credits.

SCSP Park Corridors and Trails Impact Fee -This fee funds the construction of trails and park corridors that connect residential, commercial, and recreational areas within ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 41 of 147 ends

~ 7 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
the SCSP. The system promotes connectivity and serves the recreational needs of new residents.

SCSP Wetland Preserve Buffer Impact Fee - T his fee supports the construction and maintenance of wetland buffers to protect preserve areas required by federal and state regulations. Developers may qualify for credits or reimbursement for eligible buffer construction.

SCSP Plan Area Formation Fee - The Plan Area Formation Fee reimburses costs for studies, reports, and preparatory work necessary to implement the SCSP. Developers who have contributed to these efforts may receive credits against this fee.

SCSP Administration Impact Fee - The Administration Impact Fee funds administrative duties related to the SCSP Impact Fee Program, including updates, fee collection, reporting, and reimbursements.

This fee program ensures an equitable distribution of costs among developers for c
ritical infrastructure and public facilities, supporting sustainable growth in the SunCreek Specific Plan area.

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 42 of 147 ends

~ 8 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Current Fee Schedule
The Development Fee program is reviewed periodically to ensure the Development Impact Fee Program is accounting for all planned future development. The updated Development Impact Fee Program information is then used to determine the amount of fees available for the funding of the proposed capital improvement projects identified in the development of the five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).

Single Family Multi-Family Office Commercial
Per Unit Per Unit Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft
Sunrise Douglas (SD) Impact Fees:

Interim Sewer 811.01 608.2 6 0.16 0.08 Park* 12,347.74 9,726.11 n/a n/a
Supp. Offsite Water 1,175.50 881.32 0.37 0.47 Traffic Mitigation 9,046.49 5,068.81 10.25 14.84 Program Admin 413.74 245.94 0.38 0.57 Total Fees $23,794.48 $16,530.44 $11.16 $15.96
* Park Development Fees vary by Development Agreement
Residential Non-Residential
Fee Category

SUNRISE DOUGLAS (SD) IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2024

Low Density Medium Density Compact Density High Density Retail Office Retail Office Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft SunCreek (SCSP) Impact Fees:

On-Site Roadway Fee 2,002.80 2,002.80 1,562.63 1,562.63 2 .16 1.90 2.16 1.90 Off-Site Roadway Fee 435.86 435.86 340.08 340.08 0.47 0.41 0.47 0.41 Potable Water Fee 1,452.86 1,452.86 1,089.11 1,089.11 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Storm Drainage Fee 887.86 885.71 701.68 354.07 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Wetland Mitigiation Fee 2,252.48 1,799.40 1,017.01 513.34 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 Park Corridors and Trails Fee 1,026.69 1,026.69 705.98 535.95 - - - - Wetland Preserve Buffer Fee 545.63 435.86 246.45 124.84 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Admnistration Fee (3%) 258.13 241.18 169.89 135.60 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.16 Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Plan Area Formation 2,883.00 2,883.00 2,883.00 2,883.00 2,883.00 2,883.00 2,883.00 2,883.00 Admnistration Fee (3%) 86.00 86.00 86.00 86.00 86.00 86.00 86.00 86.00 Total Fees $11,831.31 $11,249.36 $8,801.83 $7,624.62 $2,974.74 $2,974.41 $2,974.74 $2,974.41

SUNCREEK (SCSP) IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2024
Regional Town Center
Fee Category
Residential (per unit) Village Center

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 43 of 147 ends

~ 9 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Single Family Multi-Family Office Commercial Industrial Per Unit Per Unit Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft
Community Facility Impact Fees:

Community Facilities 4,066.32 3,177.25 1.01 0.62 0.26 Library 832.85 651.31 n/a n/a n/a Total Fees $4,899.17 $3,828.56 $1.01 $0.62 $0.26

COMMUNITY FACILITIES IMPACT FEES
Residential Non-Residential
Fee Category
at June 30, 2024

Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees
Residential [1]
Single Family > 1,200 SF 12,547.50 20,729.20
Sin
gle Family < 1,200 SF 8,377.94 18,241.70
Multi-Family 6,651.67 11,815.38
Age Restricted - Single Family 3,764.14 6,219.30 Age Restricted - Multi Family 3,262.76 5,390.13 Non-Residential
Commercial [2]

12.08 15.34
Office [2]

11.52 11.79
Industrial [2]

5.92 6.07
Miscellaneous
Church [2]

4.27 7.05
Gasoline/Service Station [3]
13,300.12 21,973.49
Hotel/Motel [4]
3,889.22 6,426.32
Mobile Home Park [5]
5,771.83 9,535.97
1 - Per Dwelling Unit 4 - Per Room
2 - Per Square Foot 5 - Per Unit
3 - Per Position
at June 30, 2024
Infill Area Growth Area

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 44 of 147 ends

~ 10 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Residential Office Hotel
Research &
Development Commercial Manufacturing Warehouse
Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Very Low Income Housing Impact Fee
Impact Fee n/a 0.97 0.9 2 0.82 0.7 7 0.61 0.26
Program Admin n/a
Non-Residential
Fee Category
Between $30 and $100 as determined by Plan Review

VERY LOW INCOME HOUSING IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2024

Single
Family
Multi-
Family Commercial Bus & Prof Industrial Office
Per Unit Per Unit Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Per Sq. Ft Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) Fee
Transit Development 175.00 356.00 0.77 0.70 0.16 0.45
Program Admin 3.50 7.12 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
Total Fees $178.50 $363.12 $0.79 $0.71 $0.16 $0.46
SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT (SacRT) IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2024
Residential Non-Residential
Fee Category

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 45 of 147 ends

~ 11 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Percent
Impervious
Construction
Cost/Acre
Administrative
Cost/Acre
Total
Fee/Acre
Commercial/Office/Retail1
70% 25,195.90$ 1,008.40$ 26,204$
Industrial 70% 25,195.90$ 1,008.40$ 26,204$ High Density Residential
RMH 75
% 26,997.45$ 1,080.50$ 28,078$
RD-302
70% 25,195.90$ 1,008.40$ 26,204$
RD-25 70% 25,195.90$ 1,008.40$ 26,204$
RD-20 70% 25 ,195.90$ 1,008.40$ 26,204$
Medium Density Residential
RD-15 70% 25,195.90$ 1,008.40$ 26,204$
RD-10 60% 21,597.10$ 864.19$ 22,461$ RD-7 50% 17,997.23$ 719.98$ 18,717$ RD-6 40% 14,398.43$ 575.76$ 14,974$
Low Density Residential
RD-5 40% 14,398.43$ 575.76$ 14,974$
RD-4 38% 13,678.45$ 546.71$ 14,225$ RD-3 33% 11,699.33$ 467.07$ 12,166$
RD-2 28% 9,898.85$ 394.96$ 10,294$
RD-1 25% 8,999.15$ 360.53$ 9,360$
AR-1 17% 6,119.25$ 244.30$ 6,364$
AR-2 10% 3,598.80$ 144.21$ 3,743$
AR-5 10% 3,598.80$ 144.21$ 3,743$
AR-10 10% 3,598.80$ 144.21$ 3,743$ Mowed grass with graded and piped to drain 20% 7,198.68$ 288.42$ 7,487$ Mowed grass with no piped drainage 10% 3,598.80$ 144.21$ 3,743$ Impervious Area Park2
75% 26,997.45$ 1,080.50$ 28,078$
School Campus with detention 25% 8,999.15$ 360.53$ 9,360$ School Campus 50% 1 7,997.23$ 719.98$ 18,717$

STORM DRAINAGE IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2024
Land Use

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 46 of 147 ends

~ 12 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Land Use Per Fee
Single Family Residential Unit 1,532$
Single Family Residential, Senior Unit 1,227
Mu
lti-Family Residential Unit 1,072
Multi-Family Residential, Senior Unit 918
Office Use 1,000 Sq. Ft 1,840
Retail Use 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,300
Industrial Use 1,000 Sq. Ft 1,227
Hotel/Motel Sleeping Room 888
Extended Stay Hotel/Motel Sleeping Room 789
Golf Course acre 1,275
Movie Theather screen 2,916
Religious Center 1,000 Sq. Ft 1,426
Hospital 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,570
Service Station fueling pump 1,994
Supermarket 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,300
Warehouse/Self-Storage 1,000 Sq. Ft 384
Assisted Living Facility bed 442
Congregate Care Unit 324
Child Day Care student 706
Private School (K through 12) student 399
Auto Repair/Body Shop 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,300
Gym/Fitness Center 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,300
Drive-through Car Wash 1,000 Sq. Ft 2,300
All Other avg. weekday trips 161

MEASURE A IMPACT FEES
at June 30, 2024

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 47 of 147 ends

Description

REVENUES
Fees 4,856,555 945,883 495,057 653,698 Interest 397,054 260,867 75 38 Other Revenues - - - - Total Revenues 5,253,609$ 1,206,750$ 495,132$ 653,736$

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 674,789 35,471 333,265 576,870 Transfer Out 706,141 - - - Total Expenditures 1,380,931$ 35,471$ 333,265$ 576,870$ REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 3,872,678$ 1,171,279$ 161,866$ 76,867$ 8,814,425 6,108,083 (135,971)$ (146,218) 12,687,103$ 7,279,363$ 25,895$ (69,351)$ Notes:
(1)
(2)
Financial Summary Report
City of Rancho Cordova
Suppl Offsite
WaterInterim Sewer
Sunrise Douglas
Council approved consolidation of the SD Library Fee, the Villages of Zinfandel Library Fee into the Community Facility Fee - Library Fee. For reporting purposes all activity reported in the individual library funds prior to the implementation of the consolidated library fee have all been reported in CFF - Library Fee
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Year Ending June 30, 2024
Community Facilities Fee Program
Community
Facilities (1) Library (2)
An Updated Nexus Study was adopted in April 2013 which combined facility fees which had been reported as separate line items in the prior nexus study into a single fee component called Community Facilities. For reporting purposes all activity reported in individual funds prior to the implementation of the combined fee have been consolidated for reporting purposes. ~ 13 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 48 of 147 ends

Storm Drainage lmpact Fee Prog.

Description

REVENUES
Fees 5,360,785 218,096 4,080,961 170,040 Interest 1,559,474 92,939 254,680 7,671 Other Revenues - - - - Total Revenues 6,920,259$ 311,036$ 4,335,642$ 177,711$

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 4,291,447 45,192 69,708 26,130 Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures 4,291,447$ 45,192$ 69,708$ 26,130$ REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 2,628,811$ 265,843$ 4,265,933$ 151,582$ 37,931,876$ 2,256,438$ 5,480,923$ 159,854$
40,560,688$ 2,522,281$ 9,746,857$ 311,435$
Notes:

Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Storm Drain
Program
Admin
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Year Ending June 30, 2024
Fund Balance, End of Year
City of Rancho Cordova
Financial Summary Report
Program
AdminRoadway
Sunrise Douglas Fee Program
~ 14 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 49 of 147 ends

Description

REVENUES
Fees 795,264 188,564 628,547 384,112 Interest 13,222 3,070 10,235 6,254 Other Revenues - - - - Total Revenues 808,486$ 191,635$ 638,781$ 390,367$

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - - - Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures -$ -$ -$ -$ REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 808,486$ 191,635$ 638,781$ 390,367$ -$ -$ -$ -$
808,486$ 191,635$ 638,781$ 390,367$ Notes:

SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fees
City of Rancho Cordova
Financial Summary Report
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Year Ending June 30, 2024
Onsite
Roadway
Offsite
Roadway Potable Water
Storm
Drainage
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
~ 15 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 50 of 147 ends

Description

REVENUES
Fees 974,483 444,174 236,053 - Interest 15,867 7,232 3,844 - Other Revenues - - - - Total Revenues 990,351$ 451,406$ 239,897$ -$

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - - - Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures -$ -$ -$ -$ REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 990,351$ 451,406$ 239,897$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
990,351$ 451,406$ 239,897$ -$
Notes:

City of Rancho Cordova
Financial Summary Report
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Year Ending June 30, 2024
SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fees
Backbone
Wetland
Park, Corrid. &
Trls Wetland Buffer
Plan Area
Formation
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
~ 16 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 51 of 147 ends

Description

REVENUES
Fees
Interest
Other Revenues
Total Revenues

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures
Transfer Out
Total Expenditures

REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
Notes:

Plan Administration
-
1,572$
112,276$
9,017$
City of Rancho Cordova
Financial Summary Report
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Year Ending June 30, 2024
SunCreek Specific Plan Development Impact Fees
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
111,672
2,176
-
113,849$
121,294$
1,572
~ 17 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 52 of 147 ends

Description

REVENUES
Fees 23,606,285 875,841 386,231 2,137,185 Interest 1,238,788 114,739 - 129,216 Other Revenues - - - 442,976 Total Revenues 24,845,073$ 990,580$ 386,231$ 2,709,378$

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 6,106,576 620,999 - 11,169 Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures 6,106,576$ 620,999$ -$ 11,169$ REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 18,738,498$ 369,581$ 386,231$ 2,698,209$ 25,881,021 2,647,977$ 937,035$ 2,104,117$ 44,619,518$ 3,017,558$ 1,323,266$ 4,802,325$ Notes:
(4)
Measure A
Transportation
Improvements (4)
Traffic Mitigation
Impact Fee (3)
Sacramento
Regional
Transit(4)
Very Low
Income
Housing
These fees are collected on behalf of outside Agencies during the building permit process. These funds are then remitted to the Agencies who expend the funds on projects in accordance with their approved AB1600 studies. The City relies on information provided by the Agencies to compelete the annual reproting requirements. The city does not audit the information provided by the outside Agencies.

City of Rancho Cordova
Financial Summary Report
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Year Ending June 30, 2024
~ 18 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 53 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 2,112,237 2,269,108 2,464,493 2,260,042 4,856,555 Interest 54,356 42,984 40,831 202,051 397,054 Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues 2,166,593 2,312,091 2,505,324 2,462,093 5,253,609

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 79,209 85,092 92,419 909,732 674,789 Transfer Out 337,120 337,275 337,376 337,557 706,141 Total Expenditures 416,329 422,366 429,795 1,247,288 1,380,931 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 1,750,264 1,889,725 2,075,529 1,214,805 3,872,678 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,884,101 3,634,365 5,524,091 7,599,620 8,814,425 Fund Balance, End of Year 3,634,365 $ 5,524,091 $ 7,599,620 $ 8,814,425 $ 12,687,103 $ Available Revenue 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Current Year 2,166,593 2,312,091 2,505,324 2,462,093 5,253,609 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 1,154,279 2,166,593 2,312,091 2,505,324 2,462,093 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 313,493 1,154,279 2,166,593 2,312,091 2,505,324 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - 313,493 1,154,279 2,166,593 2,312,091 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - 313,493 1,154,279 2,166,593 Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - 313,493 1,154,279 Total Revenues 3,634,365$ 5,524,091$ 7,599,620$ 8,814,425$ 15,853,990$ Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.

City of Rancho Cordova
Community Facility Fee (CFF) - Facilities
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 19 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 54 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 309,257 428,804 496,369 478,638 945,883 Interest 81,168 45,710 33,491 142,893 260,867 Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues 390,425 474,514 529,860 621,530 1,206,750

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 11,597 16,080 18,614 17,949 35,471 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures 11,597 16,080 18,614 17,949 35,471 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 378,828 458,434 511,246 603,581 1,171,279 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 4,155,994 4,534,822 4,993,256 5,504,502 6,108,083 Fund Balance, End of Year 4,534,822 $ 4,993,256 $ 5,504,502 $ 6,108,083 $ 7,279,363 $ Available Revenue 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-2024 Current Year 390,425 474,514 529,860 621,530 1,206,750 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 316,552 390,425 474,514 529,860 621,530 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 200,773 316,552 390,425 474,514 529,860 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) 310,865 200,773 316,552 390,425 474,514 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) 289,430 (1) 310,865 (1) 200,773 (1) 316,552 (1) 390,425 (1) Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years 3,026,777 (1) 3,300,127 (1) 3,592,378 (1) 3,775,201 (1) 4,056,283 (1) Total Revenues 4,534,822$ 4,993,256 $ 5,504,502 $ 6,108,083 $ 7,279,363 $ (1) The Community Facility Fees - Library Fund reports funds being held beyond the five-years as described by AB1600. These funds are being collected for a future constructuion of Library Branch(es) and therefore must be retained until enough fees have been collected to start construction of the project.

Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Community Facility Fee (CFF) - Library
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 20 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 55 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 1,137,414 1,056,840 427,334 341,300 495,057 Interest 2,946 1,093 731 5,683 75 Total Revenues 1,140,360 1,057,933 428,065 346,983 495,132

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 1,112,598 1,168,263 371,240 623,685 333,265 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures 1,112,598 1,168,263 371,240 623,685 333,265 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 27,763 (110,330) 56,825 (276,703) 161,866 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 166,473 194,236 83,906 140,731 (135,971) Fund Balance, End of Year 194,236 $ 83,906 $ 140,731 $ (135,971) $ 25,895 $ Available Revenue 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Current Year 194,236 83,906 140,731 (135,971) 25,895 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues 194,236$ 83,906$ 140,731$ (135,971)$ 25,895$ Result: Five Year Revenue Test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 City of Rancho Cordova
Sunrise Douglas (SD) - Interim Sewer
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 21 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 56 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 513,957 1,638,485 707,455 2,184,755 653,698 Interest 1,610 1,430 770 6,394 38 Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues 515,566 1,639,915 708,226 2,191,150 653,736

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 585,776 1,674,815 639,317 2,490,296 576,870 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures 585,776 1,674,815 639,317 2,490,296 576,870 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (70,210) (34,900) 68,909 (299,146) 76,867 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 189,129 118,919 84,020 152,928 (146,218) Fund Balance, End of Year 118,919 84,020 152,928 $ (146,218) $ (69,351) $ Available Revenue 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Current Year 118,919 84,020 152,928 (146,218) (69,351) Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues 118,919$ 84,020$ 152,928$ (146,218)$ (69,351)$ Result: Five Year Revenue Test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 City of Rancho Cordova
Sunrise Douglas (SD) - Supplemental Offsite Water
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
~ 22 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 57 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 7,794,321 8,308,575 5,422,457 3,552,628 5,360,785 Interest 426,346 274,564 217,342 919,767 1,559,474 Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues 8,220,668 8,583,140 5,639,798 4,472,394 6,920,259

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 3,456,292 1,977,626 1,738,409 2,578,756 4,291,447 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures 3,456,292 1,977,626 1,738,409 2,578,756 4,291,447 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 4,764,376 6,605,514 3,901,390 1,893,638 2,628,811 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 20,766,959 25,531,335 32,136,849 36,038,238 37,931,876 Fund Balance, End of Year 25,531,335$ 32,136,849 $ 36,038,238 $ 37,931,876 $ 40,560,688 $ Available Revenue 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Current Year 8,220,668 8,583,140 5,639,798 4,472,394 6,920,259 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 4,906,434 8,220,668 8,583,140 5,639,798 4,472,394 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 2,517,915 4,906,434 8,220,668 8,583,140 5,639,798 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) 4,111,280 2,517,915 4,906,434 8,220,668 8,583,140 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) 3,057,146 (1) 4,111,280 (1) 2,517,915 (1) 4,906,434 (1) 8,220,668 (1) Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years 2,717,893 3,797,413 6,170,284 (1) 6,109,442 (1) 6,724,429 (1) Total Revenues 25,531,335$ 28,339,435 $ 36,038,238 $ 37,931,876 $ 40,560,688 $ (1) The Sunrise Douglas Park Fund reports funds being held beyond the five-years as described by AB1600. These funds are being collected for the future roadway improvements necessary to serve the growning population within the Sunrise Douglas Community Plan Area and therefor must be retained until enough fees have been collected to start contruction of the various roadway projects.

Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Sunrise Douglas (SD) - Roadway
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 23 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 58 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 357,436 370,841 234,248 177,029 218,096 Interest 23,084 13,916 12,474 53,302 92,939 Other Revenues - 264,981 - - - Total Revenues 380,521 649,738 246,722 230,331 311,036

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 143,029 87,338 32,411 48,933 45,192 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures 143,029 87,338 32,411 48,933 45,192 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 237,492 562,400 214,311 181,397 265,843 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,060,838 1,298,329 1,860,729 2,075,040 2,256,438 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,298,329 1,860,729 $ 2,075,040 $ 2,256,438 $ 2,522,281 $ Available Revenue 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Current Year 380,521 649,738 246,722 230,331 311,036 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 212,792 380,521 649,738 246,722 230,331 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 111,348 212,792 380,521 649,738 246,722 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) 130,424 111,348 212,792 380,521 649,738 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) 144,028 (1) 130,424 (1) 111,348 (1) 212,792 (1) 380,521 (1) Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years 319,216 (1) 375,906 (1) 473,919 (1) 536,334 (1) 703,934 (1) Total Revenues 1,298,329$ 1,860,729 $ 2,075,040 $ 2,256,438 $ 2,522,281 $ (1) The Sunrise Douglas Program Admin Fund reports funds being held beyond the five-years as described by AB1600. These funds are being collected for the ongoing administrative cost and therefor must be retained for future cost.

Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Sunrise Douglas (SD) - Administration
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 24 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 59 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 2,291,789 2,438,640 6,659,774 8,419,105 23,606,285 Interest 369,215 162,169 126,258 596,193 1,238,788 Other Revenues 39,037 1,047,841 - - - Total Revenues 2,700,041 3,648,650 6,786,032 9,015,298 24,845,073

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 8,389,095 2,133,479 2,773,678 4,844,629 6,106,576 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures 8,389,095 2,133,479 2,773,678 4,844,629 6,106,576 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (5,689,054) 1,515,170 4,012,354 4,170,669 18,738,498 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 21,871,881 16,182,827 17,697,997 21,710,351 25,881,021 Fund Balance, End of Year 16,182,827 $ 17,697,997 $ 21,710,351 $ 25,881,021 $ 44,619,518 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2023-24 Current Year 2,174,563 2,700,041 3,648,650 6,786,032 24,845,073 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 1,628,008 2,174,563 2,700,041 3,648,650 6,786,032 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 4,063,390 1,628,008 2,174,563 2,700,041 3,648,650 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) 2,880,535 4,063,390 1,628,008 2,174,563 2,700,041 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) 1,144,114 (1) 2,880,535 (1) 4,063,390 (1) 1,628,008 (1) 2,174,563 (1) Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years 9,981,272 (1) 2,736,291 (1) 3,483,348 (1) 4,773,059 (1) 4,465,160 (1) Total Revenues 21,871,881$ 16,182,827 $ 17,697,997 $ 21,710,352 $ 44,619,518 $ (1) The Traffic Mitigation Fund reports funds being held beyond the five-years as described by AB1600. While projects are being completed on an annual basis, this fund is accumulation funds for the development and construction of a new interchange, a multi-million dollar project which is not expected to start construction in the next five year CIP funding cycle, therefor the funds must be retained until a funding level that allows construction to start has been reached.

Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.

Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fee
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 25 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 60 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - 3,874,399 1,899,862 131,227 4,080,961 Interest - 3,376 28,091 143,489 254,680 Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - 3,877,775 1,927,953 274,716 4,335,642

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - - 599,520 69,708 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures - - - 599,520 69,708 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - 3,877,775 1,927,953 (324,804) 4,265,933 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - 3,877,775 5,805,728 5,480,923 Fund Balance, End of Year - $ 3,877,775$ 5,805,728 $ 5,480,923 $ 9,746,857 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - 3,877,775 1,927,953 274,716 4,335,642 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - 3,877,775 1,927,953 274,716 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - 3,278,254 1,927,953 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - 3,208,546 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues -$ 3,877,775$ 5,805,728$ 5,480,923$ 9,746,857$ (1) The Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program was implemented in FY 2020-21 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program - Facilities
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 26 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 61 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - 11,590 79,161 107,866 170,040 Interest - 4 151 2,747 7,671 Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - 11,595 79,312 110,613 177,711

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - 139 34,342 7,185 26,130 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures - 139 34,342 7,185 26,130 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - 11,455 44,969 103,429 151,582 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - 11,455 56,425 159,854 Fund Balance, End of Year - 11,455 56,425 159,854 $ 311,435 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - 11,455 56,425 110,613 177,711 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - 49,240 110,613 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - 23,111 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues -$ 11,455$ 56,425$ 159,854$ 311,435$ (1) The Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program was implemented in FY 2020-21 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Storm Drainage Impact Fee Program - Administration
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 27 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 62 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 1,806,431 1,448,744 2,846,759 780,767 875,841 Interest 28,094 18,691 15,306 65,392 114,739 Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues 1,834,525 1,467,435 2,862,065 846,159 990,580

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 1,951,497 2,457,075 465,526 746,493 620,999 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures 1,951,497 2,457,075 465,526 746,493 620,999 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (116,972) (989,640) 2,396,539 99,666 369,581 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,193,579 1,076,607 151,772 2,548,311 2,647,977 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,076,607 $ 86,967 $ 2,548,311 $ 2,647,977 $ 3,017,558 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2023-24 Current Year 1,076,607 86,967 2,548,311 846,159 990,580 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - 1,801,818 846,159 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - 1,180,819 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues 1,076,607$ 86,967$ 2,548,311$ 2,647,977$ 3,017,558$ Result: Five Year Revenue Test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Measure A Impact Fee
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 28 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 63 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 194,011 144,149 159,551 345,645 386,231 Interest - - - - - Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues 194,011 144,149 159,551 345,645 386,231

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - - - - Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - - REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 194,011 144,149 159,551 345,645 386,231 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 93,678 287,690 431,839 591,390 937,035 Fund Balance, End of Year 287,690 $ 431,839 $ 591,390 $ 937,035 $ 1,323,266 $ Available Revenue 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Current Year 194,011 144,149 159,551 345,645 386,231 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 85,978 194,011 144,149 159,551 345,645 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) 7,700 85,978 194,011 144,149 159,551 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - 7,700 85,978 194,011 144,149 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - 7,700 85,978 194,011 Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - 7,700 93,678 Total Revenues 287,690$ 431,839$ 591,390$ 937,035$ 1,323,266$ Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.

Sacramento Regional Transit Impact Fee
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
City of Rancho Cordova
~ 29 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 64 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

REVENUES
Fees 117,936 35,498 680,720 1,128,369 2,137,185 Interest 1,775 2,329 3,030 35,889 129,216 Other Revenues 50,000 - - - 442,976 Total Revenues 169,711 37,826 683,751 1,164,259 2,709,378

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - - - 11,169 Transfer Out - - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - 11,169 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 169,711 37,826 683,751 1,164,259 2,698,209 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 48,570 218,281 256,107 939,858 2,104,117 Fund Balance, End of Year 218,281 $ 256,107 $ 939,858 $ 2,104,117 $ 4,802,325 $ Available Revenue 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Current Year 169,711 37,826 683,751 1,164,259 2,709,378 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) 48,570 169,711 37,826 683,751 1,164,259 Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - 48,570 169,711 37,826 683,751 Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - 48,570 169,711 37,826 Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - 48,570 169,711 Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - 37,401 Total Revenues 218,281$ 256,107$ 939,858$ 2,104,117$ 4,802,325$ Result: Five Year Findings required in accordance with Government Code 66001 to be approved as part of current year report.

City of Rancho Cordova
Low Income Housing Impact Fee
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
~ 30 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 65 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - - 795,264
Interest - - 13,222
Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - - 808,486

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - -
Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 808,486 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - Fund Balance, End of Year - $ - $ 808,486 $ Available Revenue 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - - - 808,486 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ - $ - $ 808,486$ (1) The SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Program was implemented in FY 2022-23 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

City of Rancho Cordova
Suncreek Specific Plan Onsite Roadway
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 31 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 66 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - - 188,564
Interest - - 3,070
Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - - 191,635

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - -
Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 191,635 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - Fund Balance, End of Year - $ - $ 191,635 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - - - 191,635 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ - $ - $ 191,635$ (1) The SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Program was implemented in FY 2022-23 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

City of Rancho Cordova
Suncreek Specific Plan Offsite Roadway
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 32 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 67 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - - 628,547
Interest - - 10,235
Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - - 638,781

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - -
Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 638,781 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - Fund Balance, End of Year - $ - $ 638,781 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - - - 638,781 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ - $ - $ 638,781$ (1) The SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Program was implemented in FY 2022-23 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

City of Rancho Cordova
Suncreek Specific Plan Potable Water
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 33 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 68 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - - 384,112
Interest - - 6,254
Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - - 390,367

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - -
Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 390,367 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - Fund Balance, End of Year - $ - $ 390,367 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - - - 390,367 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ - $ - $ 390,367$ (1) The SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Program was implemented in FY 2022-23 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

City of Rancho Cordova
Suncreek Specific Plan Storm Drainage
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 34 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 69 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - - 974,483
Interest - - 15,867
Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - - 990,351

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - -
Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 990,351 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - Fund Balance, End of Year - $ - $ 990,351 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - - - 990,351 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ - $ - $ 990,351$ (1) The SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Program was implemented in FY 2022-23 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

City of Rancho Cordova
Suncreek Specific Plan Backbone Wetland Mitigation
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 35 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 70 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - - 444,174
Interest - - 7,232
Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - - 451,406

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - -
Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 451,406 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - Fund Balance, End of Year - $ - $ 451,406 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - - - 451,406 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ - $ - $ 451,406$ (1) The SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Program was implemented in FY 2022-23 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

City of Rancho Cordova
Suncreek Specific Plan Parks, Corridors & Trails
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 36 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 71 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - - 236,053
Interest - - 3,844
Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - - 239,897

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - -
Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 239,897 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - Fund Balance, End of Year - $ - $ 239,897 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - - - 239,897 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - - Total Revenues -$ -$ - $ - $ 239,897$ (1) The SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Program was implemented in FY 2022-23 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

City of Rancho Cordova
Suncreek Specific Plan Wetland Preserve Buffer
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 37 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 72 of 147 ends

Description 2019-20 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1)

REVENUES
Fees - - 8,985 111,672 Interest - - 32 2,176 Other Revenues - - - - - Total Revenues - - 9,017 113,849

EXPENDITURES
Expenditures - - - 1,572 Transfer Out - - - - Total Expenditures - - - - 1,572 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES - - 9,017 112,276 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - 9,017 Fund Balance, End of Year - $ - $ 9,017 $ 121,294 $ Available Revenue 2018-19 2020-21 (1) 2021-22 (1) 2022-23 (1) 2023-24 (1) Current Year - - - 113,849 Prior Year (2-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (3-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (4-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Prior Year (5-yr Old Funds) - - - - - Greater than Five Prior Fiscal Years - - - - 7,445 Total Revenues -$ -$ - $ - $ 121,294$ (1) The SunCreek Specific Plan Fee Program was implemented in FY 2022-23 and does not have 5 years worth of data to report at this time.

City of Rancho Cordova
Suncreek Specific Plan Administration
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For Last Five Fiscal Years
Five Year Revenue Test Using First In First Out Method
~ 38 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 73 of 147 ends

~ 39~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Notes to the Annual Development Impact Fee Report
The Notes address two items required by California Government Code Section 66006(b).

Notes 1-3 provides information on any interfund transfer or loans made from a development fee account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fee will be expended. In the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest the account or fund will receive on the loan is also provided. Note 4 provides information on the amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collected to complete financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues exceeding the amount to be refunded.

NOTE #1 – 2017 SERIES A & B REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION On January 25, 2017 $11,925,000 and $4,470,000 in Refunding Certificated of Participat ion (COP’s) were issued by the Rancho Cordova Finance Corporation (the “Corporation”) to refund both the 2005 & 2007 Certificates of Participations, which were issued for City Hall Facility Acquisition and City Operations. Principal payments of $ 190,000 to $1, 235,000 are due annually on February 1st through February 1, 2035. Concurrently, the City entered into a facilities lease agreement with the Corporation for the use and occupancy of the facilities.

The lease agreement requires the City to make rental payments to the Corporation equal to the Certificates of Participation’s principal and interest payments.

The CFF - Community Facilities Fee is responsible for 62.5% of the principal an d interest attributable to the tax -exempt COP’s (2017 A). As of June 30, 20 23, the CFF - Community Facilities Fee gross repayment obligation, including interest, totaled $ 9,745,506. During FY 2022-23 the CFF - Community Facilities Fee made payments totaling $ 337,376, including bank fees.

Future payments on these COP’s are as follows:

Principal Interest Total
2025 506,250 322,030 828,280
2026 531,250 296,717 827,967
2027 556,250 270,155 826,405
2028 584,375 242,342 826,717
2029 615,625 213,123 828,748
2029-2033 3,546,875 584,273 4,131,148
2034-2035 743,750 26,961 770,711
7,084,375 1,955,602 9,039,977
2017 Series A & B
CFF - Community Facilities Obligation
Long Term Debt Obligation
at June 30, 2024
Total Payments Due
For the Year
Ending June 30

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 74 of 147 ends

~ 40~
City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
NOTE #2 – DEFERRED IMPACT FEES
In May 2008, the City enacted a Temporary Fee Deferral Program for certain development impact fees. This program allows residential and non -residential developers to defer eligible impact fees normally paid at the time of building permit issuance to the earlier of final inspection, issuance of temporary or final certificate of occupancy, or one -year from the date the fee deferral application was approved. Although originally set to expire after one year, through various Council actions, the program has been modified to remove the sunset date.

Developer impact fees deferred at June 30, 2023 are as follows:

Non-Residential
Fee Program Single Family Multi-Family All Types
Community Facility Fee - Library - - -
SD Interim Sewer Impact Fee -
SD Su
pplemental Offsite Water Fee -
SD Traffic Mitigation Fee -
Transportation Impact Fee -
Total Fees Deferred -$ -$ -$

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRALS
at June 30, 2024
Residential
NOTE #3 – REFUNDS PAYABLE As defined by California Government Code Section 66006 (b) When the City no longer needs the funds for the purposed collected, or if the City fails to make required findings or perform certain administrative tasks prescribed by AB1600, the City may be required to refund, on a prorated basis, to property owners of the properties upon which the fees for the improvement were imposed, the monies collected for that project and any interest earned on those funds.

At this time, all fees being collected pursuant to the Development Impact Fee Program(s) have been earmarked for current or future capital projects necessary to maintain the current levels of service within existing services area to serve new development.

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 75 of 147 ends

~ 41 ~

City of Rancho Cordova
Development Impact Fee Report
Development Fee Project Identification - California Government Code Section 66006 and 66001 require the City to make certain findings and meet reporting requirements on the use of development fees.

The following table, on pages 28 -30, illustrates several of the reporting requirements defined in the Legal Requirement section on pages 1-3.
• An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees. • An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement. • Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
• Designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.

Most of the current projects including all funding sources and approximate dates on funding can be found in the 2020/21 – 2024/25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Some projects identified as “Future” in the Project Phase column will not be identified in the CIP but will be found in the corresponding Development Fee Program instead.

Information regarding completed projects which received full or partial funding from development impact fees can be obtained by contacting the Finance Department.

ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 76 of 147 ends

Project
Number Current Project(s)
Project Phase
(1)
Estimated
Start Date
Completion
Date
Estimated Project
Cost Budget to Date (2) Funding to Date (2)
Attrib. to
New Dev
Community Facility Fee - Community Facilities
Administrative Duties associated with Community Facilities Fee Program (inc. updates) Admin 2004 Post 2023-24 n/a 1,413,291 1,413 ,291 100% Animal Control Vehicles Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 106,000 - - 63% City Hall Cost Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 53,856,000 - - 63% 80075 Suite 220 Renovation Construction 2023 2023 1,000,000 1,3 15,649 1,3 15,649 132 % Community Center Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 46,834,000 - - 63% Corportation Yard Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 26,291,000 - 1,0 26,842 63% Debt Service Payment(s) - Refunding COPS 2017 A&B Debt Service 2017 2035 23,750,647 14,8 44,155 2,71 2,987 63% Hansen Computer System Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,310,000 - - 63% Museum Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 19,993,000 - - 63% Parking Structure Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 16,571,000 - - 63% Police Facilities Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 56,085,000 - - 63% Police Vehicles & Equipment Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 4,172,000 - - 63% Total Community Facility Fee - Community Facilities 249,968,647$ 17,573,095$ 6,4 68,769$ Community Facility Fee - Library
Administrative Duties Admin 2004 Post 2023-24 n/a 141,973 141,9 73 100% Regional Library Facility Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 43,858,000 - - 79% Total Community Facility Fee - Library 43,858,000$ 141,973$ 141,973$ Sunrise Douglas - Interim Sewer
Chrysanthy Blvd Lift Station Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,466,569 - 76, 638 16% Chrysanthy Blvd Trunk Sewer Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,506,556 - 17 9,761 28% 80025 Douglas Blvd Lift Station Construction 2016 2017 1,730,000 1, 730,000 608 ,104 100% Douglas Blvd Lift Station Reimb/Credit 2017 N/A 1,573,034 1, 573,034 843 ,895 100% Folsom South Canal Crossing: Sewer Costs Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,545,991 - - 19% Sewer Forcemain: Chrysanthy Blvd Lift Station to Mayhew Road Outfall Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 5,802,192 - 17% Sewer Forcemain: Douglas Lift station to Chrysanthy Blvd Reimb/Credit 2003 N/A 660,607 660, 607 50 1,929 100% Sewer Studies Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 30,000 - - 100% Total Sunrise Douglas - Interim Sewer 14,314,949$ 3,963,641$ 2,210 ,326$ Sunrise Douglas - Suppl Offsite Water
Folsom South Canal Crossing: Water Costs Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 1,566,583 - - 18% North Douglas Tank Site Land Reimb/Credit 2003 2007 1,386,000 1,0 45,833 1,0 45,833 100% Vineyard Wells 4-7 Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 3,520,000 - - 10% Anatolia III - Major Roads 24" Water Transmission Main Reimb/Credit 2020 Post 2023-24 1,315,309 428,500 428,500 Anatolia GTWP, Excelsior Raw Water Line, Vineyard Wells 1-3 Reimb/Credit 2007 Post 2023-24 7,641,507 148,370 148,370 Total Sunrise Douglas - Suppl Offsite Water 15,429,399$ 1,622,703$ 1,6 22,702$ Sunrise Douglas - Roadway
80008 Americanos Blvd, Douglas Rd to Chrysanthy Blvd Construction 2008 Post 2023-24 3,052,000 3, 052,000 488, 482 100% 80000 Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Environmental 2005 Post 2023-24 100,000,000 500, 000 1, 996,820 100% Americanos Blvd Phase II, Chrysanthy Blvd to Kiefer Blvd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 3,423,000 3,3 26,000 - 97% 80001 Chrysanthy Blvd, Sunrise Blvd to Rancho Cordova Pkwy Construction 2006 2019 3,762,000 3,334 ,000 3,3 72,883 89% Chrysanthy Blvd Phase II, Rancho Cordova Pkwy to Grant Line Rd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 10,431,000 10, 431,000 - 100% 80002 Douglas Road Phase I, Rancho Cordova Pkwy to Borderlands Dr Reimb/Credit 2006 2015 2,146,000 2,14 6,000 2, 434,196 100% 80004 Douglas Road, Americanos Blvd to Grant Line Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 6,585,000 4, 961,000 2,63 9,051 75% 80015 Douglas Road, Rancho Cordova Pkwy to Americanos Blvd Construction 2010 2018 8,200,000 8, 200,000 5, 340,902 100% 80012 Kiefer Blvd Phase II, Sunrise Blvd to Grant Line Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 9,332,000 10, 000 78 0% 80006 Kiefer Blvd, Sunrise Blvd to Jaeger Road Reimb/Credit 2007 Post 2023-24 7,510,626 4,0 26,526 4,0 26,526 86% 80005 Rancho Cordova Parkway, Douglas Rd to Kiefer Blvd Reimb/Credit 2006 Post 2023-24 11,857,800 11 ,228,500 4,9 87,734 95% 80017 Sunrise Blvd Widening and Intersection Improvements, Keifer Blvd to State Rte. 16 Preliminary 2011 2020 13,000,000 1,23 1,000 228,26 5 9% Development Impact Fees
City of Rancho Cordova
Development Fee Program Identification - Active & Future Projects ~ 42 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 77 of 147 ends

Project
Number Current Project(s)
Project Phase
(1)
Estimated
Start Date
Completion
Date
Estimated Project
Cost Budget to Date (2) Funding to Date (2)
Attrib. to
New Dev
Development Impact Fees
City of Rancho Cordova
Development Fee Program Identification - Active & Future Projects Sunrise Douglas - Roadway - Continuted
80003 Sunrise Blvd, Douglas Rd to Kiefer Blvd Reimb/Credit 2006 Post 2023-24 16,334,786 16, 185,435 16, 185,435 92% 80076 Frontage Improvements - Sunrise & Douglas Reimb/Credit 2022 Post 2023-24 430,352 430 ,352 430 ,352 100% 45005 PW Project Impact Fee Tracking Admin 2004 Post 2023-24 n/a 268 268 80040 Chrysanthy Blvd Phase II, Rancho Cordova Pkwy to Grant Line Rd Reimb/Credit 2022 Post 2023-24 35,941,568 25 ,474,453 1,9 80,462 Total Sunrise Douglas - Roadway 92,582,213$ 65,079,461$ 44,1 11,454$ Sunrise Douglas - Admin
Administrative Duties associated with the Sunrise Douglas Fee Program Admin 2004 Post 2023-24 n/a 1,805,049 1, 805,049 100% 45035 Transportation Masterplan Admin 2023 Post 2023-24 - - 23,9 75 Total Sunrise Douglas - Admin -$ 1,805,049$ 1,8 29,024$ Traffic Mitigation - Impact Fee
Americanos Blvd Phase II, Chrysanthy Blvd to Kiefer Blvd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 3,423,000 97 ,000 - 3% Americanos Blvd Phase III, International Dr to Douglas Rd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 9,247,000 9,24 7,000 - 100% Centennial Drive, International Drive to Grant Line Road Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 10,348,000 10, 348,000 - 100% 80004 Douglas Road, Americanos Blvd to Grant Line Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 6,585,000 1, 586,000 15 0,001 24% 80018 Douglas Road - Sunrise to Wst City Boundary Preliminary 2013 Post 2023-24 16,512,000 62 ,000 75, 614 0% 80016 Easton Valley Parkway (6th Ave), Sunrise Blvd to City Limits Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 10,192,000 10, 192,000 - 100% 80010 International Drive, Sunrise Blvd to Rancho Cordova Pkwy Loop Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 46,700,000 46 ,700,000 60 3,258 100% 80012 Kiefer Blvd Phase II, Sunrise Blvd to Grant Line Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 9,332,000 9,3 22,000 - 100% 80006 Kiefer Blvd, Sunrise Blvd to Jaeger Road Reimb/Credit 2007 Post 2023-24 7,510,626 2, 643,695 2, 643,695 86% 80005 Rancho Cordova Parkway, Douglas Rd to Kiefer Blvd Reimb/Credit 2006 Post 2023-24 11,857,800 629, 300 - 5% 80000 Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Environmental 2005 Post 2023-24 100,000,000 8, 082,000 7,0 62,093 8% Rancho Cordova Parkway South, Kiefer Blvd to Grant Line Rd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 3,876,000 3, 876,000 - 100% 80011 Rio Del Oro Parkway, Sunrise Blvd to White Rock Rd Planned Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 12,024,000 12,0 24,000 - 100% 80017 Sunrise Blvd Widening and Intersection Improvements, Keifer Blvd to State Rte. 16 Preliminary 2011 2020 13,000,000 47 ,000 400, 971 1% Villagio, Douglas Rd to White Rock Rd Future Post 2022-23 Post 2023-24 2,608,000 2, 608,000 - 100% 80020 White Rock Road and Gold Valley Dr Signal and Intersection Improvements Design 2014 2018 900,000 35 0,000 344, 184 39% 80007 White Rock Road Improvements Phase I, Sunrise to Rancho Cordova Pkwy Design 2007 Post 2023-24 18,366,000 6, 987,000 4,4 27,835 38% 80019 Zinfandel Complex Phase I Feasibility Study Construction 2013 2020 12,585,000 8, 147,000 8,3 62,420 65% 80033 Zinfandel Pedestrian & Bicycle Crossing Design 2020 Post 2023-24 3,815,000 21 9,000 239 ,512 6% 80040 Chrysanthy Boulevard Phase II Reimb/Credit 2020 Post 2023-24 10,467,115 7,777, 106 7,777, 106 74% 80055 White Rock Road, 0.5 Mile East of Rancho Cordova Parkway to Easterly City Limits Design 2022 2025-26 1,350,000 1, 350,000 53 9,444 100% 45009 General Plan - Circulation Element Update Admin 2021 2022 240,000 24 0,000 207 ,222 100% 45005 PW Project Impact Fee Tracking Admin 2023 Post 2023-24 - - 432 45027 Traffic Impact Fee Implementation Admin 2023 Post 2023-24 - - 45, 567 45031 Project Development Admin 2023 Post 2023-24 - - 10 ,337 45033 SB743 Analysis Admin 2023 Post 2023-24 - - 8, 358 45035 Transportation Masterplan Admin 2023 Post 2023-24 - - 39, 626 Total Traffic Mitigation - Impact Fee 291,643,426$ 132,850,995$ 32,9 37,676$ Traffic Mitigation - Admin
Administrative Duties associated with Traffic Mitigation Fee Program (including updates) Admin 2004 Post 2023-24 n/a 715,550 715,550 100% 80009 Villages of Zinfandel Traffic Signals Construction 2009 2019 1,411,000 11,000 2,244 1% PW Project Impact Fee Tracking Planning 2021 Post 2023-24 3,380,899 283 ,121 283 ,121 8% Total Traffic Mitigation - Admin 1,411,000$ 1,009,671$ 1, 000,915$ ~ 43 ~
ITEM 13.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 78 of 147 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 79 of 147 ends

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 13.3.

DATE: January 6, 2025

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Edgar Medina, Principal Engineer

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 2024-105-01 WITH CENTRAL VALLEY
ENGINEERING & ASPHALT, INC. TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT
AMOUNT BY $34,382.20 TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$258,777.95 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PHASE 6 PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution and approval of the construction contract change order with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. aligns with the objectives of the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program to enhance safety on city streets. The contract change order allows staff to utilize an existing contract to promptly implement traffic-calming measures that benefit the residents with traffic-calming measures at newly designated locations.

BACKGROUND

On July 15, 2024, City Council approved a construction contract with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Phase 6 Project to implement traffic-calming measures at three locations throughout the City.

The goal of the Project and of the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) is to identify specific areas where safety may be improved through traffic-calming measures.

Measures commonly utilized to calm traffic include bulbouts, speed humps, striping and signage. This sixth phase of the NTMP incorporated common traffic-calming measures at specific locations on Zinfandel Drive, Edington Drive and Justinian Drive.

The proposed contract change order covers additional scope that includes striping on Justinian Drive and speed humps, striping & signage on Pericles Drive. The change order covers the full costs to furnish all labor, materials, and equipment for construction of new speed humps, signage and striping.

Page 80 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

Staff recommendation is to approve the construction contract change order for Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. in the amount of $34,382.20.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Funding for this contract will consist of Measure A and Infrastructure Replacement Funds. This project is included in the approved 2024/2025 budget.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Contract No. 2024-105-01

Page 81 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2025 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 2024-105-01 WITH CENTRAL VALLEY ENGINEERING & ASPHALT, INC. TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY $34,382.20 TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $258,777.95 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PHASE 6 PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City solicited bids for the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) Phase 6 Project under the requirements of state law and publicly opened bids on June 13, 2024; and

WHEREAS, the lowest responsible bidder is Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc.; and

WHEREAS, on July 15, 2024, City Council approved Construction Contract No. 2024-105 to Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $224,395.75 for the NTMP Phase 6 Project; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of this Resolution for Contract Change Order No. 2024-105-01 with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. will increase the contract amount by $34,382.20 to an amount not to exceed $258,777.98 for the NTMP Phase 6 Project; and WHEREAS, the approval of Contract Change Order No. 2024-105-01 is being recommended for the costs associated with additional striping scope on Justinian Drive and the inclusion of new traffic-calming measures on Pericles Drive, and WHEREAS, funding for this project consists of Measure A and Infrastructure Replacement Funds; and
WHEREAS, there is no impact to the City’s General Fund; and

WHEREAS, the NTMP Phase 6 Project will install speed humps, speed lumps, bulbouts, electronic speed feedback advisory signs, bike lane striping, and associated improvements at various locations throughout the City; and

WHEREAS, this project was reviewed under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) at the time the City approved its five-year Capital Improvement Program, and it has been determined to be exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Regulation 15301(l) regarding repairs, maintenance, or minor alterations to “existing facilities,” so long as the project only involves negligible or no expansion beyond the current facilities.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute Contract Change Order No. 2024-105-01 with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt to increase the contract amount by $34,382.20 to an amount not to exceed $258,777.95, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Page 82 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2025 Page 2 of 2

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of January 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Siri Pulipati, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 83 of 147 ends

CONTRACT NO. 2024-105-01
First Amendment to Construction Services Agreement between City of Rancho Cordova and Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. Page 1 of 2

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND CENTRAL VALLEY ENGINEERING & ASPHALT, INC.

FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PHASE 6 PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. CP15-2159, CS80022
T
his First Amendment to the Construction Services Agreement (“Amendment”) is made by and between the City of Rancho Cordova (“City”) and Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc (“Contractor”) as of January 6, 2025. City and Contractor are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties."

RECITALS
W HEREAS , the Parties entered into a Construction Services Agreement (“C SA”) dated July 16, 2024 for the purpose of constructing the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Phase 6 Project; and
W
HEREAS, this Amendment will approve for Contract Change Order 2024- 105-01 with Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. will increase the contract amount by $34,382.20 to an amount not to exceed $258,777.98 for the NTMP Phase 6 Project; and W
HEREAS, the approval of Contract Change Order 2024-105-01 is being recommended for the costs associated with additional striping scope on Justinian Drive and the inclusion of new traffic - calming measures on Pericles Drive, and
W
HEREAS, the Parties agree that changes to the term and services provided for in the CSA are necessary in order for the City to continue receiving services by Contractor.

NO
W, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

REEMENT

1. S
ection 5 of the CSA, “Payment,” provides for the City to pay Contractor Two Hundred Twenty- Four Thousand Three Hundred Ninety -Five Dollars and Seventy -Five Cents ($224,395.75). The Parties agree to amend Section 5 of the C SA in order to increase the compensation amount to pay Contractor for additional services. Section 5 of the CSA is amended to read as follows:
“
PAYMENT. Attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and by reference made a part hereof, is the bid and proposal of Contractor. Said bid and proposal will contain, as required by the terms of said specifications, the full and complete schedule of the different items with the lump sums or unit prices as so specified. The City agrees in consideration of the work to be performed for the Project herein and subject to the terms and conditions thereof, to pay Contractor all sums of money which may become due to Contractor in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid bid and proposal, and this Agreement, to wit: Two Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars and Ninety-Five Cents ($258,777.95 ). Said sum shall be paid in accordance with Section 8 of the Standard Specifications. With respect to that portion of the above sum as is based upon the estimated quantities specified for the general scope of the ITEM 13.3.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 84 of 147 ends

CONTRACT NO. 2024-105-01
First Amendment to Construction Services Agreement between City of Rancho Cordova and Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc. Page 2 of 2 work to be performed herein, actual payment will be based upon the quantities as measured upon completion. No payment made under this Agreement shall be construed to be an acceptance of defective work or improper.

2. All
other terms and conditions in the C SA shall remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this Amendment.

3. The s
ignatures of the Parties to this Amendment may be executed and acknowledged on separate pages or in counterparts which, when attached to this Amendment, shall constitute one complete Amendment.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment on the day and year first above written.

CIT

Y OF RANCHO CORDOVA CONTRACTOR
______
______________________ ______________________________
Micah Runner, City Manager James Castle, CFO/Secretary Dat
e:__________________ Date:__________________
Atte
st:
______
______________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk
Dat
e:__________________
Appr
oved as to Form:
______
______________________
Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Dat
e:__________________
ITEM 13.3.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 85 of 147 ends

2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670  (916) 851-8700  Fax (916) 851-8787  www.cityofranchocordova.org Form 3.14A Con tract Change Order (rev. 02-14-2011)
By reason of this order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: 10 working days Submitted by:

Construction Manager/Resident Engineer
City of Rancho Cordova Date:

Recommend
Approval by:

Project Manager
City of Rancho Cordova Date:

Approved by:

Public Works Director
City of Rancho Cordova Date:

We, the
undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and all of its impacts, both direct and indirect, and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices and time extensions shown above.

Acceptance Date: _________________________ Contractor: ______________________________________ By: _____________________________________ Title: ______________________________________ If the Contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.

Original
to:

Contractor
City Clerk
Copies
to:

Resident Engineer
City Project Manager
City Manager or Designee Date
City of Rancho Cordova
Project Name:

Neighborhood Traffic
Management Program Phase 6

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Contr
act Change Order No. 1
Sheet 1 of 4
City Contract No. CP15-2159
To: Central Valley Engineering and Asphalt. You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications on this contract.

Description of work to be done, quantities and prices to be paid. Unless otherwise stated, rates for rental of equipment cover only such time as equipment is actually used and no allowance will be made for idle time.

Change requested by: Engineer
Extra W
ork at Agreed Lump Sum/Agreed Unit Price

1. Supply an
d install traffic stripe (paint) on Justinian Way as shown on attached sheet 2 of change order #1.

2. On Pericles Drive, provide traffic control, supply and install speed hump and signs as shown on attached sheet 3 of change order #1 INCREASE:

INCREASE
:
$13,141.8
0 $21,240.0
4 Total Cost of Change: $34,382.20
Con
tract Summation:

Original
Contract:
$224,395.75 Total Change Orders: $34,382.20 New Contract Cost Total: $258,777.95 11/22/2024

EXHIBIT A
ITEM 13.3.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 86 of 147 ends

39 39
39 39
39 39
122
38 CCO #01
Sheet 2
ITEM 13.3.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 87 of 147 ends

CCO #01
Sheet 3
ITEM 13.3.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 88 of 147 ends

1"'
... s� ' ',
..
fTl
;::o
]>
-j
D
n
f-1
;::o
tJj
f-1
z n �
::r::
--<
�
]>
--<

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

PUBLIC WORKS

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM PHASE 2024
SCALE: 1:20
DATE: 9/3/2024 ? OF?
CCO #01
Sheet 4
ITEM 13.3.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 89 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 4
\

MEMORANDUM
ITEM 13.4.

DATE:January 6, 2025
TO:Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:Kim Juran-Karageorgiou, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: TREASURER’S REPORT – SEPTEMBER 30, 2024

RECOMMENDATION
This report is informational only. It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the September 30, 2024, Treasurer’s Report.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Treasurer’s Report is required to be submitted to the City Council at least quarterly in accordance with California Government Code Section 53600 et. seq. The purpose of the Treasurer’s Report is to update the City Council and the public on the status of the City’s cash balances and investments and highlight material changes from one period to another. The scope of this report covers the third quarter of the 2024 calendar year ending September 30, 2024, and is in compliance with the State’s reporting requirements.

BACKGROUND
Attached is the quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the period ending September 30, 2024.

Treasurer’s Reports are provided to the City Council on a quarterly basis.

On June 30, 2024, the value of the City’s total portfolio was $366.6 million. Since that time, the City’s cash balances increased by $11.0 million with an ending balance of $377.6 million as of September 30, 2024. The funds are held as follows:

Investment Distribution Book Value Market Value
Cash at Banking Institutions 174,713,001 174,713,001
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 6,626,740 6,626,740 CAMP Pool 62,420,137 62,420,137
CAMP Managed Account 66,026,944 66,925,235
Insight Investment 66,094,847 66,866,422
Total 375,881,669 377,551,535

Page 90 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 4
The third quarter of 2024 continued to support a soft-landing outlook for the U.S. economy, reinforced by low unemployment and resilient consumer spending. As expected, the Fed cut the overnight policy rate by 50 bps in September to bring the new target range to 4.75%-5.00%.

U.S. inflation continued to make progress towards the Fed’s 2% target as both headline CPI (2.5%) and Core CPI (3.2%) ended the quarter at their lowest levels in over three years.

The City’s cash balance as of September 30, 2024, was allocated by fund type/purpose as follows:
•General Fund: $33.3 million
•Community Enhancement & Investment Fund (Measure H & R): $29.5 million •Sunrise Development Impact Fees (restricted for specific improvements needed as a result of development in the area): $43.5 million
•Transportation Funds: $113.1 million
•Storm Drain Fund: $21.2 million
•Capital Projects/Grant/Special Revenue Funds: $93.8 million •Agency Funds (funds held for other entities): $41.4 million The overall portfolio is well diversified with $132.1 million invested in marketable securities, $69.0 million is invested in short-term investments that are considered liquid (LAIF, CAMP, and Cash at Banking
Institutions 46.3%
Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF)

1.8%
CAMP Pool 16.5%
CAMP Managed
Account 17.7%
Insight Investment

17.7%
Investment Portfolio

Page 91 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 4
money markets), and another $174.7 million is on deposit with our banks, which includes $5.7 million on deposit with one local bank as part of the City’s participation in a local banking initiative. Staff, in conjunction with our financial advisors, periodically review the mix of liquid and long-term investments and adjusts the portfolio according to the market conditions and our short-term cash needs.

Staff thoroughly review investment statements and make appropriate inquiries of its investment advisors to confirm the existence and viability of the City’s assets. The City invests conservatively in investment policy options in accordance with California State Government Code. The long-term assets are in securities that can be held to maturity, thus are less vulnerable to the fluctuations of the market. All securities are in compliance with the City’s investment policy. There are sufficient funds to meet the City’s expenditure requirements for the next six months.

The distribution of investments are displayed in the following charts:

Under 1 Year

70.8%
1 to 3 Years

16.8%
Over 3 Years

12.4%
Investment Ladder

Page 92 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 4
ATTACHMENT(S):

1. City of Rancho Cordova Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2024 Short Term Investment Pool
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
Bank Note 0.2%
Municipal Bond /
Note 0.4%
Federal Agency
Commerical
Mortgage-Backed
Security 3.0%
Federal Agency Bond /
Note 6.4%
Corporate Note 3.6%
Commercial Paper

0.5%
Corporate Bonds

5.3%
Certificate of Deposit 0.5% Asset-Backed Security

2.3%
Allocation By Security Type

Page 93 of 147 ends

Security Held Book Value Market Value
Wells Fargo Bank 169,041,462 169,041,462
5 Star Bank 5,671,540 5,671,540
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 6,626,740 6,626,740 CAMP Pool 62,420,137 62,420,137
CAMP Managed Account 66,026,944 66,925,235
Insight Investment 66,094,847 66,866,422
Total 375,881,669
377,551,535

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

TREASURER'S REPORT
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED September 30, 2024
ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 94 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 95 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 96 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 97 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 98 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 99 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 100 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 101 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 102 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 103 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 104 of 147 ends

ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 105 of 147 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2024

0.000 1 1,373.92 11,373.92 0.00 0.00 0.0211,373.9211,373.92Cash and Cash Equivalents Total Cash and Cash Equivalents 11,373.92 11,373.92 11,373.92 0.00 0.020.0011,373.92 Corporate Bonds
931142DV2 2 .650 12/15/2024 1,009,812.00 950,808.27 (4,974.16) 7,342.71 10/15/2024

1.55945,834.11950,000.00WALMART INC 2.65% 15DEC2024 (CALLABLE 04NOV24) 166764BW9 1.554 05/11/2025 1,525,696.00 1,584,837.32 (12,764.07) 9,600.27 04/11/2025

2.341,572,073.251,600,000.00CHEVRON CORP 1.554% 11MAY2025 (CALLABLE 11APR25)
24422ETC3 3.400 09/11/2025 593,280.00 597,901.54 (2,357.07) 1,076.67 0.91595,544.47600,000.00JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 3.4% 11SEP2025 478160BY9 2.450 03/01/2026 949,330.00 973,334.33 7,363.79 1,973.61 12/01/2025

1.45980,698.121,000,000.00JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.45% 01MAR2026 (CALLABLE 01DEC25)
06051GFX2 3.500 04/19/2026 768,064.00 781,894.30 10,278.66 12,522.22 1.18792,172.96800,000.00BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.5% 19APR2026 023135BX3 1.000 05/12/2026 902,520.00 945,553.40 10,561.72 3,833.33 04/12/2026

1.38956,115.121,000,000.00AMAZON.COM INC 1% 12MAY2026 (CALLABLE 12APR26)
46625HRS1 3.200 06/15/2026 949,700.00 977,034.52 8,307.46 9,333.33 03/15/2026

1.45985,341.981,000,000.00JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.2% 15JUN2026 (CALLABLE 15MAR26)
693475AX3 2.600 07/23/2026 741,568.00 764,670.28 13,346.52 3,871.11 05/24/2026

1.14778,016.80800,000.00PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES 2.6% 23JUL2026 (CALLABLE 23MAY26)
037833DN7 2.050 09/11/2026 609,082.50 616,015.20 13,017.26 703.26 07/11/2026

0.93629,032.46650,000.00APPLE INC 2.05% 11SEP2026 (CALLABLE 11JUL26) 89236TDR3 3.200 01/11/2027 1,031,052.00 1,053,601.39 28,508.77 7,724.44 1.581,082,110.161,100,000.00TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 3.2% 11JAN2027 8 ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 106 of 147 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2024

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Corporate Bonds
24422EWD7 2 .350 03/08/2027 553,404.00 569,423.55 8,320.81 861.67 0.85577,744.36600,000.00JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 2.35% 08MAR2027 437076CA8 2.500 04/15/2027 1,398,930.00 1,432,791.39 16,775.61 17,187.50 02/15/2027

2.141,449,567.001,500,000.00HOME DEPOT INC 2.5% 15APR2027 (CALLABLE 15FEB27)
91159HHR4 3.150 04/27/2027 789,072.00 808,286.37 24,779.51 11,379.38 03/27/2027

1.21833,065.88850,000.00US BANCORP 3.15% 27APR2027 (CALLABLE 27MAR27) 194162AN3 3.100 08/15/2027 1,501,091.98 1,521,401.87 22,136.54 6,072.13 07/15/2027

2.301,543,538.411,567,000.00COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO 3.1% 15AUG2027 (CALLABLE 15JUL27)
037833DB3 2.900 09/12/2027 850,563.00 869,243.06 10,557.06 1,305.00 06/12/2027

1.30879,800.12900,000.00APPLE INC 2.9% 12SEP2027 (CALLABLE 12JUN27) 89236TKL8 5.450 11/10/2027 512,655.00 509,010.55 12,057.60 10,597.22 0.78521,068.15500,000.00TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 5.45% 10NOV2027 02665WED9 4.700 01/12/2028 611,328.00 607,955.85 2,757.93 6,110.00 0.94610,713.78600,000.00AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 4.7% 12JAN2028 02665WEM9 5.125 07/07/2028 713,811.00 711,568.84 11,641.80 8,271.18 1.09723,210.64700,000.00AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 5.125% 07JUL2028 17325FBB3 5.803 09/29/2028 1,033,740.00 1,028,621.11 29,949.51 161.19 08/29/2028

1.581,058,570.621,000,000.00CITIBANK NA 5.803% 29SEP2028 (CALLABLE 29AUG28) 61747YFA8 5.123 02/01/2029 800,040.00 800,033.48 20,160.06 6,716.82 02/01/2028

1.22820,193.54800,000.00MORGAN STANLEY 5.123% 01FEB2029 (CALLABLE 01FEB28)
17275RBR2 4.850 02/26/2029 998,640.00 998,748.14 35,435.08 4,580.56 01/26/2029

1.531,034,183.221,000,000.00CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.85% 26FEB2029 (CALLABLE 26JAN29)
9 ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 107 of 147 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2024

0.79519,549.09500,000.00MORGAN STANLEY 5.449% 20JUL2029 (CALLABLE 20JUL28)
Total Corporate Bonds 19,359,139.48 19,618,135.05 19,888,144.24 270,009.19 29.64136,521.2420,017,000.00 Government Agencies
3130AL2A1 0 .500 02/10/2025 1,002,860.00 1,000,000.00 (16,026.85) 694.44 11/10/2024

1.54983,973.151,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.5% 10FEB2025 (CALLABLE 10NOV24)
3137EAEX3 0.375 09/23/2025 1,017,610.00 1,054,698.33 7,168.88 80.21 1.561,061,867.211,100,000.00FREDDIE MAC 0.375% 23SEP2025 3133ENP95 4.250 09/30/2025 1,151,759.50 1,150,588.13 1,968.39 0.00 1.761,152,556.521,150,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.25% 30SEP2025 3133EPYK5 5.125 10/10/2025 1,101,749.00 1,100,932.46 12,475.04 26,621.53 1.691,113,407.501,100,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 5.125% 10OCT2025 3133EPMB8 4.125 12/08/2025 1,484,865.00 1,492,713.41 11,846.98 19,250.00 2.271,504,560.391,500,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.125% 08DEC2025 3133EPCF0 4.500 03/02/2026 1,120,416.00 1,109,964.72 (445.09) 3,850.00 1.721,109,519.631,100,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.5% 02MAR2026 3133EPHH1 4.000 04/28/2026 906,378.30 903,392.20 (1,599.93) 15,200.00 1.39901,792.27900,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4% 28APR2026 3130AN4T4 0.875 06/12/2026 903,900.00 945,136.94 8,777.58 2,625.00 1.38953,914.521,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.875% 12JUN2026 3130AWLZ1 4.750 06/12/2026 1,146,607.50 1,147,917.54 21,125.10 16,387.50 1.761,169,042.641,150,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.75% 12JUN2026 3133EPNG6 4.375 06/23/2026 1,000,360.00 1,000,207.09 11,875.08 11,788.19 1.531,012,082.171,000,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.375% 23JUN2026 10 ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 108 of 147 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2024

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Agencies
3133ENV72 4 .500 07/27/2026 998,761.20 999,395.77 13,505.68 7,875.00 1.531,012,901.451,000,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.5% 27JUL2026 3130APJH9 1.250 10/28/2026 1,178,866.00 1,233,474.13 15,494.07 6,861.11 10/28/2024

1.801,248,968.201,300,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1.25% 28OCT2026 (CALLABLE 28OCT24) #0006
3133EPK79 4.375 12/07/2026 1,245,867.50 1,246,999.74 20,640.01 17,165.80 1.911,267,639.751,250,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.375% 07DEC2026 3133ERGT2 4.500 06/11/2027 1,000,520.00 1,000,467.52 21,407.13 13,625.00 1.531,021,874.651,000,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.5% 11JUN2027 3130ATUS4 4.250 12/10/2027 1,206,438.70 1,204,265.27 19,401.73 15,583.33 1.851,223,667.001,200,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.25% 10DEC2027 3133EN5N6 4.000 01/06/2028 904,194.00 902,784.95 7,339.99 8,400.00 1.38910,124.94900,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4% 06JAN2028 3130ATS57 4.500 03/10/2028 1,014,989.00 1,010,320.02 18,804.53 2,500.00 1.551,029,124.551,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.5% 10MAR2028 3130AWC24 4.000 06/09/2028 999,822.81 999,868.44 15,450.93 12,333.33 1.531,015,319.371,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4% 09JUN2028 3130AVBD3 4.500 03/09/2029 989,580.00 990,543.94 45,230.43 2,625.00 1.511,035,774.371,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.5% 09MAR2029 3130B1BC0 4.625 06/08/2029 609,150.00 608,731.03 17,054.74 11,331.25 0.93625,785.77600,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.625% 08JUN2029 Total Government Agencies 20,984,694.51 21,102,401.63 21,353,896.05 251,494.42 32.13194,796.6921,250,000.00 Government Bonds
91282CFQ9 4 .375 10/31/2024 988,675.23 999,111.22 399.48 18,189.54 1.51999,510.701,000,000.00USA TREASURY 4.375% 31OCT2024 11 ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 109 of 147 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2024

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Bonds
91282CFX4 4 .500 11/30/2024 693,494.53 699,000.42 719.31 10,500.00 1.06699,719.73700,000.00USA TREASURY 4.5% 30NOV2024 912828YY0 1.750 12/31/2024 1,041,253.35 1,003,149.63 (10,337.13) 4,375.00 1.59992,812.501,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.75% 31DEC2024 91282CGU9 3.875 03/31/2025 984,143.98 995,553.47 2,016.84 0.00 1.51997,570.311,000,000.00USA TREASURY 3.875% 31MAR2025 9128284M9 2.875 04/30/2025 965,862.73 989,341.53 2,447.53 11,953.13 1.48991,789.061,000,000.00USA TREASURY 2.875% 30APR2025 912828XZ8 2.750 06/30/2025 1,059,999.78 1,085,361.85 4,046.35 7,562.50 1.621,089,408.201,100,000.00USA TREASURY 2.75% 30JUN2025 912828Y79 2.875 07/31/2025 964,534.60 986,016.24 4,452.51 4,765.63 1.48990,468.751,000,000.00USA TREASURY 2.875% 31JUL2025 91282CAJ0 0.250 08/31/2025 1,279,250.00 1,365,277.90 (12,702.90) 290.06 1.961,352,575.001,400,000.00USA TREASURY 0.25% 31AUG2025 9128285J5 3.000 10/31/2025 739,660.72 746,464.29 (3,847.10) 9,354.62 1.13742,617.19750,000.00USA TREASURY 3% 31OCT2025 9128285N6 2.875 11/30/2025 962,347.10 982,037.92 6,516.77 9,583.33 1.47988,554.691,000,000.00USA TREASURY 2.875% 30NOV2025 9128286F2 2.500 02/28/2026 713,645.09 727,234.06 9,523.75 1,553.87 1.09736,757.81750,000.00USA TREASURY 2.5% 28FEB2026 912828YD6 1.375 08/31/2026 913,909.60 948,360.51 9,686.37 1,139.50 1.40958,046.881,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.375% 31AUG2026 91282CCZ2 0.875 09/30/2026 899,612.73 938,829.13 8,436.49 0.00 1.38947,265.621,000,000.00USA TREASURY 0.875% 30SEP2026 12 ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 110 of 147 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2024

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Bonds
91282CDK4 1 .250 11/30/2026 906,487.73 941,248.45 9,689.05 4,166.67 1.39950,937.501,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.25% 30NOV2026 91282CDQ1 1.250 12/31/2026 904,104.91 938,847.35 10,722.96 3,125.00 1.38949,570.311,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.25% 31DEC2026 91282CEC1 1.875 02/28/2027 922,698.66 949,516.32 10,835.24 1,553.87 1.41960,351.561,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.875% 28FEB2027 91282CET4 2.625 05/31/2027 1,031,253.68 1,051,210.67 21,976.83 9,625.00 1.581,073,187.501,100,000.00USA TREASURY 2.625% 31MAY2027 91282CEW7 3.250 06/30/2027 1,255,875.45 1,269,749.20 19,282.05 10,562.50 1.921,289,031.251,300,000.00USA TREASURY 3.25% 30JUN2027 91282CFB2 2.750 07/31/2027 563,791.07 572,101.32 14,515.87 2,735.05 0.86586,617.19600,000.00USA TREASURY 2.75% 31JUL2027 91282CFU0 4.125 10/31/2027 843,893.47 845,583.85 17,863.41 14,577.62 1.29863,447.26850,000.00USA TREASURY 4.125% 31OCT2027 91282CHA2 3.500 04/30/2028 970,628.35 972,906.83 24,632.23 14,551.63 1.49997,539.061,000,000.00USA TREASURY 3.5% 30APR2028 91282CHX2 4.375 08/31/2028 2,105,010.94 2,104,337.96 56,283.14 7,613.95 3.222,160,621.102,100,000.00USA TREASURY 4.375% 31AUG2028 91282CJF9 4.875 10/31/2028 1,275,297.16 1,272,560.29 38,474.86 25,335.43 1.951,311,035.151,250,000.00USA TREASURY 4.875% 31OCT2028 91282CES6 2.750 05/31/2029 901,007.84 901,726.59 4,749.19 8,616.67 1.38906,475.78940,000.00USA TREASURY 2.75% 31MAY2029 13 ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 111 of 147 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of September 30, 2024

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Bonds
91282CFJ5 3 .125 08/31/2029 1,077,359.15 1,077,409.46 (311.80) 2,848.76 1.651,077,097.661,100,000.00USA TREASURY 3.125% 31AUG2029 Total Government Bonds 24,963,797.85 25,362,936.46 25,613,007.76 250,071.30 38.22184,579.3325,940,000.00 Grand total 65,319,005.76 66,094,847.06 771,574.9167,218,373.92 100.00515,897.2666,866,421.97 14 ITEM 13.4.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 112 of 147 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.1.

DATE: January 6, 2025

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM:

Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Anthony D. Amara, Deputy City Attorney
J. Palmer Hilton, Deputy City Attorney

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF 2024 CALIFORNIA LAWS

RECOMMENDATION

Receive update.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

This item will assist the Council and staff to comply with newly enacted state laws on a range of topics critical to the City.

This Agenda Item and report briefly summarize new California laws adopted in 2024 that are of interest to the City. Unless otherwise stated, these laws go into effect January 1, 2025. We will work closely with Council and staff in coming months to ensure compliance with these new obligations.

DISCUSSION

HOUSING
•SB 1395 (Becker): The Interim Housing Act: Extending Homeless Shelter and Navigation Center Exemption to CEQA and Other State and Local Restrictions

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
•AB 1170 (Valencia): Changes to Filing Rules with the FPPC •SB 1243 (Dodd): Levine Act Campaign Contribution Restrictions: Changes to Dollar Amount and Cure Period.

BROWN ACT MEETINGS
•AB 2302 (Addis) Teleconferencing

Page 113 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

LAND USE
•SB 937 (Weiner) Impact Fee Deferral for Residential Projects. •AB 2553 (Friedman): Lower Traffic Impact fees and Expanded CEQA Exemption for Housing Development Projects Close to Major Transit Stops.

ADUs
•AB 3057 (Wilson): CEQA Exemption for Adoption of Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinances
•AB 2533 (Carillo): Extension of Building Code Amnesty for Noncompliant ADUs and JADUs.

ENTERTAINMENT
•SB 969 Entertainment Zones (Weiner): Alcoholic Beverage Consumption.

PLANNING
•AB 1889 (Friedman): The Room to Roam Act: Wildlife and Habitat Connectivity to be Considered in General Plan Conservation Element.
•AB 2023 (Quirk-Silva) Housing Element: Deadlines for Submittal

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Memorandum – Handout

Page 114 of 147 ends

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200
Sacramento, California 95814
tel (916) 556-1531
fax (916) 556-1516
www.meyersnave.com
Adam U. Lindgren
[email protected]

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO

MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 30, 2024
TO: City of Rancho Cordova Council & Staff
FROM: Adam U. Lindgren, Anthony D. Amara, J. Palmer Hilton RE: Summary of 2024 California Laws
Housing
SB 1395 (Becker): The Interim Housing Act: Extending Homeless Shelter and Navigation Center Exemption to CEQA and Other State and Local Restrictions Existing law permits a city to declare a homeless shelter crisis within its jurisdiction if the city makes specified findings.

Under existing law, when a city takes specified actions pursuant to such a declared shelter crisis leasing, conveying, or encumbering land owned by the city, providing financial assistance to, or otherwise approving, a low barrier navigation center to help individuals experiencing homeless transition to more permanent housing are exempt from CEQA review.

This bill expands the CEQA exemption to include approval of contracts to provide services for people experiencing homelessness to a homeless shelter, revises the definition of “low barrier navigation center” to include non-congregate and relocatable shelters, and extends this CEQA exemption indefinitely.

Existing law also gives cities the option to suspend local building approval procedures or state housing, health, habitability, planning and zoning, or safety standards, procedures, and laws if strictly following these requirements would prevent, hinder, or delay the response to the declared shelter crisis. Instead of complying with those laws, a city may adopt an ordinance imposing reasonable standards and procedures for design, site development, and operation of homeless shelters. The goal is to introduce flexibility into local land use regulations to accommodate shelter development.

This bill extends the sunset date for the authorization to declare a shelter crisis for ten extra years, to 2036, and eliminates the expiration date on the CEQA exception.

ITEM 16.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 115 of 147 ends

To: City of Rancho Cordova Council & Staff
From: Adam U. Lindgren, Anthony D. Amara, J. Palmer Hilton Re: Summary of 2024 California Laws
Date: December 30, 2024
Page: 2

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO Conflicts of Interest
AB 1170 (Valencia): Changes to Filing Rules with the FPPC AB 1170 alters how statements of economic interests (Form 700s) are filed and retained for those filers who file with the FPPC. Starting January 1, 2025, those public officials for whom the FPPC is the filing officer must now file electronically. In Rancho Cordova, Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners, the City Manager, City Attorney, candidates, and other City positions will be required to electronically file their Form 700s with the FPPC.

AB 1170 permits filing officers to now retain paper reports that are filed pursuant to Government Code Section 81009 in an electronic format or in another space-saving format, to be available for public inspection.

SB 1243 (Dodd): Levine Act Campaign Contribution Restrictions: Changes to Dollar Amount and Cure Period.

Elected and appointed officials are prohibited under the Political Reform Act from accepting, soliciting or directing a contribution of more than $250 from a participant, party, or agent of a participant or party while a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use is pending before the agency. The contribution limit also applies for 12 months following the date of a final decision in such a proceeding. Certain violations of this law may be cured by returning the contribution, or portion of the contribution in excess of the limit, within 14 days of the officer accepting, soliciting, or receiving the contribution, whichever is later.

SB 1243’s amendments to the Political Reform Act include raising the dollar amount from $250 to $500. SB 1243 also clarifies the definition of “license, permit, or other entitlement” to exclude: competitively bid contracts that are required by law, agency policy, or agency rule to be awarded pursuant to a competitive process; labor contracts; personal employment contracts; contracts under $50,000; contracts where no party receives financial compensation; contracts between two or more agencies; periodic review or renewal of a development agreement (unless material modifications and amendments are proposed, as defined). Modifications or amendments to these contracts are also excluded, except in the case of competitively bid contracts.

SB 1243 also clarifies what it means to have a license, permit or other entitlement for use “pending” before an officer. Now, having an item involving the license, permit, or other entitlement for use includes, but is not limited to: having the item placed on the agenda for discussion of decision at a public meeting of the body of which the officer is a member, and also circumstances when the officer knows such license, permit, or other entitlement for use ITEM 16.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 116 of 147 ends

To: City of Rancho Cordova Council & Staff
From: Adam U. Lindgren, Anthony D. Amara, J. Palmer Hilton Re: Summary of 2024 California Laws
Date: December 30, 2024
Page: 3

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO is within the jurisdiction of the officer’s agency and it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will come before the officer in the officer’s decision-making capacity.

The bill extends the “cure” period for contributions in violation of this law, to 30 days after accepting, soliciting, or directing the contribution, whichever is latest.

Brown Act Meetings
AB 2302 (Addis) Teleconferencing
The Brown Act generally allows teleconferencing if an agency identifies all teleconference locations, and it posts the agenda and allows members of the public to participate at all the teleconference locations. In addition, existing law, until January 1, 2026, allows legislative bodies to use alternative teleconferencing in specified circumstances, if at least a quorum of members are present in-person in the jurisdiction, and other requirements are satisfied. AB 2302 amends the restrictions on how often a member may participate telephonically: no more than two meetings per year, if the legislative body regularly meets once per month or less; no more than five meetings per year, if the legislative body regularly meets twice per month; no more than seven meetings per year, if the legislative body regularly meets three or more times per month. This means that alternative teleconferencing will only be available for Rancho Cordova Councilmembers five times a year. Beyond that limit, the requirements of traditional teleconferencing would need to be satisfied to participate remotely.

Land Use
SB 937 (Weiner) Impact Fee Deferral for Residential Projects.

The Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66008 et seq) addresses development impact fees that are levied by local governments to support public improvements associated with the impact of a residential development. The goal of this law is to reduce financing costs for housing development and support the state’s housing construction goals.

It is important to remember that cities and developers remain free to negotiate fee payment schedules that differ from the timelines in the Mitigation Fee Act in a development agreement pursuant to Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 65864) of Chapter 4 of the Government Code.

For residential developments that are not subject to a development agreement, existing law prohibits local agencies from collecting fees on residential developments for construction of public improvements or facilities until the date of final inspect or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued (whichever comes first). Existing law carved out an exception to this timing requirement for utility service fees. SB 937 makes a clarification to this utility ITEM 16.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 117 of 147 ends

To: City of Rancho Cordova Council & Staff
From: Adam U. Lindgren, Anthony D. Amara, J. Palmer Hilton Re: Summary of 2024 California Laws
Date: December 30, 2024
Page: 4

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO exception: utility services fees related to connections may be charged when the service is received, but cannot exceed the costs incurred by the utility provider resulting from the connection activities.

SB 937 also creates another exception when a local agency can require fees to be paid sooner than the date of the final inspection or certificate of occupancy (whichever is sooner), but not all projects are encompassed by this exception. Cities can seek sooner payment of development impact fees when fees are to reimburse the local agency for expenditures previously made. Another instance where fees may be collected sooner is when an account is established and funds are appropriated for the public improvement and the public improvement relates to: water service to the development; sewer or wastewater service to the development; fire, public safety or emergency services to the development; road, sidewalks and other transportation improvements serving the development; or certain school facilities.

These exceptions permitting sooner collection of fees do not apply to units reserved for occupancy by lower income households included in a residential development proposed by a housing developer in which at least 49 percent of the total units are reserved for occupancy by lower income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code, at an affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code.

AB 2553 (Friedman): Lower Traffic Impact fees and Expanded CEQA Exemption for Housing Development Projects Close to Major Transit Stops.

Existing law provides a number of tools to encourage and facilitate infill development near transit. AB 2553 expands these in two ways. Under the Mitigation Fee Act, cities may require housing developers to pay fees as a condition on development approval for the cost of the impacts of their projects on city infrastructure, including roads. Such fees must be lower for housing developments that meet certain conditions, including being located within a ½ mile distance and accessibility to a transit station, proximity of convenience retail uses, and meeting minimum parking space requirements. This bill has changed “transit station” which meant a rail or light-rail station, ferry terminal, bus hub, or bus transfer station) to “transit priority area” which means an area within ½ mile of an existing or planned site containing a major transit stop, which is any of the following: an existing rail or bus rapid transit station; a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service; the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods). With this change, a major transit stop can be planned but not yet built, as long as it will be completed before or within one year of the scheduled completion of the development at issue. AB 2553 also expanded an exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for residential projects on infill sites and transit priority projects within a half mile of a major transit stop. The bill broadens the definition of a “Major transit stop” to mean the intersection of bus routes with a service ITEM 16.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 118 of 147 ends

To: City of Rancho Cordova Council & Staff
From: Adam U. Lindgren, Anthony D. Amara, J. Palmer Hilton Re: Summary of 2024 California Laws
Date: December 30, 2024
Page: 5

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO interval of 2- minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods, which is more permissive than the previous standard of a service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

The Legislature’s goal with this bill is to lower impact fees for more classes of project and update the definition of a “major transit stop” to reflect that public transit ridership remains low in the post-COVID era.

ADUs
AB 3057 (Wilson): CEQA Exemption for Adoption of Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinances
A Junior Accessor Dwelling Unit (JADU) is a separate living facility that exists within an existing single or multi-family dwelling. JADUs have their own entrance and cooking facilities but are not necessarily required to have their own private bathroom.

Existing law creates a CEQA exemption for ordinances permitting Accessory Dwelling Units; AB 3057 extends this CEQA exemption to ordinances permitting JADUs in single family residential zones.

AB 2533 (Carillo): Extension of Building Code Amnesty for Noncompliant ADUs and JADUs.

Existing law creates an amnesty for unpermitted Accessory Dwelling Units. This amnesty provides that permits shall not be denied if the ADU was constructed before 2018 in violation of building standards set forth in Section 17960 et seq of the Health and Safety Code, or if the ADU does not comply with Section 66333 et seq of the Government Code.

However, AB 2533 clarifies that a city may still deny a permit under the following circumstances: namely, if it finds that correcting the violation is necessary to comply with the standards specified in Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety Code.

AB 2533 makes several other changes as well: extending amnesty for unpermitted ADUs to those built before 2020. AB 2533 also clarifies that Junior Accessory Dwelling Units are covered by this amnesty provision. This new law also requires cities to make information publicly available online regarding the amnesty, which must include: a checklist of the conditions stated in Health and Safety Code Section 17920.3 that would deem a building “substandard” and information to the homeowner that they may obtain a confidential third- party code inspection to determine the scope of necessary improvements prior to seeking a permit. When city Code Enforcement identifies health and safety standard noncompliance, it must provide recommendations to comply with such standards. No penalty for ITEM 16.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 119 of 147 ends

To: City of Rancho Cordova Council & Staff
From: Adam U. Lindgren, Anthony D. Amara, J. Palmer Hilton Re: Summary of 2024 California Laws
Date: December 30, 2024
Page: 6

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO noncompliance may be imposed and a city is required to approve any permits necessary to correct the health and safety standards.

Also, impact fees or connection or capacity charges may not be charged when homeowners seek permits for ADUs and JADUs constructed before 2020 (with an exception for utility infrastructure required to comply with Health and Safety Code Section 17920.3 or as authorized by Government Code Section 66324(e)—in those cases, impact fees may still be levied).

Entertainment
SB 969 Entertainment Zones (Weiner): Alcoholic Beverage Consumption.

This bill allows cities to create entertainment zones in which consumption of one or more types of alcoholic beverages is permitted on public streets, sidewalks, or public rights-of- way. It is an amendment to a bill passed in 2023 that permitted the City and County of San Francisco to create such entertainment zones.

Before creating an entertainment zone by ordinance, a city is required to notify local law enforcement and request feedback about specific aspects of the proposed zone, including, the zone’s proposed boundaries and days and hours of operation. A city is also required to provide the Department of Alcoholic Beverages a copy of the ordinance, information as may be necessary to identify the boundaries of the entertainment zone, the days and hours of operation of the entertainment zone, the types of alcoholic beverages permitted within the entertainment zone, and the approved non-glass and nonmetal containers that alcoholic beverages will be served in.

A city that establishes an entertainment zone pursuant to SB 969 must review the operation of the entertainment zone every 2 years following the adoption of the entertainment zone, and make any reports produced during the review available to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon request. The bill also requires a process to be created by which persons in possession of alcoholic beverages in the zone may be readily identifiable as being 21 years of age or older.

Planning
AB 1889 (Friedman): The Room to Roam Act: Wildlife and Habitat Connectivity to be Considered in General Plan Conservation Element.

Under existing law, cities are required to adopt a comprehensive general plan with specified elements such as a land use element and a housing element. A general plan’s conservation ITEM 16.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 120 of 147 ends

To: City of Rancho Cordova Council & Staff
From: Adam U. Lindgren, Anthony D. Amara, J. Palmer Hilton Re: Summary of 2024 California Laws
Date: December 30, 2024
Page: 7

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO element must consider the effect of development on natural resources located on public lands.

AB 1889 adds a new requirement that must be included within a conservation element: the effect of development on the movement of wildlife and the connectivity of wildlife habitats.

In Rancho Cordova, this is a topic that has already consistently been addressed in major development projects for quite some time.

For general plans adopted or updated after July 1, 2028, the conservation element must identify and analyze habitat connectivity areas and identify and analyze specific wildlife passage features to ensure that planned development does not undermine their effectiveness.

If cities already have such policies elsewhere in their general plans, they may incorporate those by reference into the conservation element to comply with AB 1889. AB 1889 also mandates that cities avoid, minimize or mitigate the impact of development on wildlife movement to the extent feasible, and analyze and consider ways to remediate existing inappropriate barriers to wildlife movement and restore degraded wildlife habitat. AB 1889 offers a list of optional requirements to make future development more wildlife-friendly, such as incorporating building standards for wildlife friendly features such as buffers, appropriate movement barriers, corridors, compact development standards, and through consulting with expert wildlife agencies and scientific literature.

AB 2023 (Quirk-Silva) Housing Element: Deadlines for Submittal The state’s Housing Element Law requires cities to prepare a housing element within its general plan that identifies adequate sites to accommodate housing at all income levels. If a city’s housing element fails to do so, existing law requires a rezoning of sites. AB 2023 generally shortens the deadline for completing this rezoning from three years to one year. For the 7
th and each subsequent revision of the housing element, a city must complete rezoning of the sites for an inventory deemed non-compliant within one year of the statutory deadline for the adoption of the housing element. Cities may extend this deadline to 3 years and 90 days if the local government satisfies several requirements.

Of note, the bill also creates a rebuttable presumption of invalidity for housing elements deemed noncompliant by HCD. This means that a party challenging a city’s action (or failure to act) as inconsistent with an adopted housing element gets an initial advantage in that legal action.
5828638.7
ITEM 16.1.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 121 of 147 ends

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.2.

DATE: January 6, 2025

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Ian Winbrock, Management Analyst II
Megan Siren, Assistant to the City Manager

SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PRESENTATION

RECOMMENDATION

Staff is seeking direction from Council on the recommendation that the City Council approve the installation of the following three temporary art projects for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, funded through the Art in Public Places Bucket of the Community Enhancement and Investment Fund (CEIF):

1. Lincoln Village Asphalt Art Murals – Intersection murals designed to improve traffic safety and foster community identity.

2. Rain-Activated Sidewalk Poetry – Poetry installations promoting accessibility and visibility during rainy weather.

3. Chalk Art Placemaking Words – Interactive chalk art installations promoting accessibility and community engagement during dry weather.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Approval of the motion would authorize the installation of three temporary art projects in Lincoln Village neighborhood that are designed to enhance community spaces, improve safety through visual traffic calming, and promote civic engagement through public art as well as approve the formation of a review committee to select the artists for the installations. This action supports the City's strategic goals for public art, placemaking, and transportation safety.

BACKGROUND

The Art in Public Places Bucket was established in FY 2018/19 as part of the Community Enhancement and Investment Fund (CEIF) to support public art projects across the City of Rancho Cordova. This initiative gained further direction with the adoption of the City of Rancho Cordova Arts Strategic Plan in FY 2019/20, emphasizing the role of art in fostering a vibrant and inclusive community.

Since its inception, approximately $196,000 has been invested in public art projects. The majority of these investments, approximately $143,000, were allocated between FY 2020/21 and FY 2024/25. To date, these funds have supported:
• Utility Box Wraps: 26 installations

Page 122 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

• Murals: Five installations
• Mosaics: One installation
• Temporary Art Installations: Four installations

The Public Works Department has a history of integrating art into transportation infrastructure that preceded the creation of the Arts in Public Places Bucket. This approach not only enhances public spaces but also contributes to traffic safety and placemaking. Looking forward, this integration offers opportunities in projects like the Traffic Safety Plan in 2025 and ongoing pavement and surface treatment programs.

To continue this momentum, staff recommends the approval of three temporary art installations funded through the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Art in Public Places Bucket:

1. Lincoln Village Asphalt Art Murals – Intersection murals designed to enhance traffic safety and community identity.

2. Rain-Activated Sidewalk Poetry – Poetry installations promoting accessibility and visibility during rainy weather.

3. Chalk Art Placemaking Words – Interactive chalk art promoting accessibility and community engagement.

Staff recommends a review committee to evaluate applicants for two separate Calls for Artists:
one for the Lincoln Village Intersection Murals and another for the Sidewalk Poetry and Placemaking Words. The proposed review committee would include a member from the Arts Community (Cheryl Gleason, MACC Curator & RC Arts President, City Staff (Public Works Staff Member), Cordova Community Council (Shelly Blanchard, Executive Director), It Takes a Lincoln Village (ITLV) (Member selected by ITLV) and Professional Artist (to be determined).

Studies have shown that integrating art into transportation infrastructure can significantly enhance safety. According to the Bloomberg Philanthropies Asphalt Art Safety Study, these projects reduce the rate of crashes involving pedestrians and other vulnerable road users by 50%, decrease injury-related crashes by 37%, and lower total crash rates by 17%. By increasing the visibility of pedestrian spaces, promoting a walkable environment, and encouraging drivers to slow down and remain alert, public art not only beautifies streetscapes but also creates safer, more engaging public spaces.

These projects aim to enhance community spaces, promote accessibility, and continue the City’s commitment to public art and transportation safety.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

The budget for Community Enhancement and Investment Fund (CEIF) - Art in Public Places bucket for Fiscal Year 2024/25 was approved at $50,000. The total cost for the proposed art installations is $29,723.77. The additional funding available was utilized to install the utility box wraps.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Presentation

Page 123 of 147 ends

1 FY 24/25 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
January 6, 2025
CityOfRanchoCordova.org
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 124 of 147 ends

2 OUTLINE
History Current
Opportunities
Future
Opportunities
Staff
Recommendations
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 125 of 147 ends

3 Art in Public Places
2018 - 2024
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 126 of 147 ends

4 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES INVESTMENTS -
$197,000 SINCE 2018
X
FY
18 / 19
Art in Public
Places Bucket
Created
Arts Strategic
Plan Adopted
FY
19 / 20
FY
20 / 21
FY
24 / 25
$143,000 invested
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 127 of 147 ends

5 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES INVESTMENTS –

EXAMPLES
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 128 of 147 ends

6 • Primary Art in Public Places
ar
t is utility boxes
• Art is relatively evenly
di
stributed across City
• Most murals are located
w
ithin 1 mile of each other

• Only a single mosaic
i
nstallation
• Temporary art installations
w
ere co-located with public
transit stations
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES –

BY LOCATION
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 129 of 147 ends

7 Current Opportunities: 2025 - 2026
Temporary Asphalt Art
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 130 of 147 ends

8 ENHANCING THE LINCOLN VILLAGE

TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT
• History of Public Works
in
tegrating art into
transportation infrastructure
• Tr affic safety plan in 2025
• Potential for art integration into
s
tandard pavement and surface
treatment program
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 131 of 147 ends

9 FURTHERING OUR EXISTING INVESTMENTS
Integration Placemaking Instagram-worthy
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 132 of 147 ends

10 Project #1 –
Lincoln Village
Asphalt Art Murals
Project #2 –
Sidewalk Poetry &
Placemaking Words
TWO PROPOSED PROJECTS –
BUDGET: ~$30,000
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 133 of 147 ends

11 PROJECT #1 –

LINCOLN VILLAGE ASPHALT ART MURALS
x3
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 134 of 147 ends

12 PROPOSED

LINCOLN VILLAGE

ASPHALT ART

LOCATIONS
Lincoln Village Drive /
Explorer Drive – West
Lincoln Village Drive /
Explorer Drive – East
Lincoln Village Drive /
Virgo Street
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 135 of 147 ends

13 PROJECT #2 –
SIDEWALK POETRY x2 & PLACEMAKING WORDS x2
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 136 of 147 ends

14 FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES
2026 - BEYOND
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 137 of 147 ends

15 Future recommendation
• Updated Arts Strategic Plan
F
uture opportunities staff is exploring
• Asphalt art integration into major corridors
• Process to sponsor / request utility box art
• Integration of art into implementation of
Ec
onomic Development Strategic Plan

FUTURE RECOMMENDATION AND

OPPORTUNITIES FROM STAFF
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 138 of 147 ends

16 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 139 of 147 ends

17 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends Council provide direction to approve three temporary art installations for the FY 2024 – 2025 Art in Public Places Bucket

1. Lincoln Village asphalt art murals

2. Rain activated sidewalk poetry promoting accessibility

3. Chalk art placemaking words promoting accessibility
R
eview committee for art: Comprised of one member of each group • Arts community: Cheryl Gleason, MACC Curator & RC Arts President • City staff: P ublic Works Department
• CCC: She lly Blanchard, Executive Director
• It Takes a Lincoln Village (ITLV): Ch osen by ITLV
• Professional artist: Determined by Cheryl Gleason
ITEM 16.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 140 of 147 ends

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.3.

DATE: January 6, 2025

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Brenda Roach, Human Resources Manager

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION FOR THE 180-DAY WAIT PERIOD EXCEPTION FOR

HIRING WILLIAM (STEVE) HARRIMAN AS A TEMPORARY EXTRA-
HELP EMPLOYEE UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7522.56
AND 21224

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the appointment of William (Steve) Harriman, a retired annuitant, to the position of Program Manager to perform emergency and extra work for the City of Rancho Cordova under the 180-day wait period exception in Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21224.

BACKGROUND

The Public Employees Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) made substantial changes to public employee pension laws in California. One of those changes requires retired annuitants to be separated from employment for at least 180 days before returning to work for an employer in the same retirement system from which they receive a pension. An exception can be made if the governing body adopts a resolution to waive the separation period. The waiver allows the employer to hire a retired annuitant to perform work of limited duration, such as elimination of backlogs and limited term special projects.

The retired annuitant position will complete two special projects for the City’s solid waste programs. The City recently completed a competitive procurement process for a new residential solid waste collection and street sweeping contract, which resulted in the award of a new contract to Atlas Disposal. The term of the new contract is January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2034. The first special project is the management of the transition of service providers from Republic Services to Atlas Disposal for residential solid waste collection and street sweeping services. The transition project includes significant public education and outreach regarding the new service provider and coordination between City staff and Atlas customer service and operations staff to establish processes to address illegal dumping, missed pickups, container exchanges, billing questions and concerns, waste collection from City facilities and events, generation of monthly and annual reports, labeling of existing trash, recycling and organics containers in the field, onboarding of new accounts, tracking franchise fee payments,

Page 141 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

implementation of City website tools and smartphone app, and administration of the annual property tax levy process for collection of bad debt. City and Atlas staff will work closely to ensure a smooth transition of service providers.

The second special project is the onboarding and training of Marc Hill, the new Management Analyst II in the Public Works Department. The new employee will support the City’s solid waste programs and other programs in the Operations and Maintenance Division. The solid waste duties will include administration of the residential and commercial solid waste franchises, participating in the regional MOU for edible food recovery, management of CalRecylce grants, including used oil, beverage containers, and SB 1383 organics recovery, management of HHW agreements with Elk Grove and the City and County of Sacramento, responding to customer calls, preparation and submittal of CalRecycle annual reports, etc. The retired annuitant assignment will allow time to onboard and train the new Management Analyst II.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

The funding for this appointment will be absorbed into the current public works department budget.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Appointment Letter

Page 142 of 147 ends

ITEM 16.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No XX-2025 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAIVING THE 180-DAY WAIT PERIOD FOR HIRING WILLIAM (STEVE) HARRIMAN AS A TEMPORARY EXTRA HELP EMPLOYEE (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 7522.56 & 21224)
WHEREAS, in compliance with Government Code Section 7522.56, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova must provide CalPERS with this certification Resolution when hiring a retiree before 180 days has passed since his or her retirement date; and WHEREAS, William (Steve) Harriman, CalPERS ID 3102334982, is scheduled to retire from the City of Rancho Cordova in the position of Operations and Maintenance Division Manager on December 30, 2024; and
WHEREAS, section 7522.56 requires that post-retirement employment commence no earlier than 180 days after the retirement date, which is June 30, 2025, without this certification Resolution; and
WHEREAS, section 7522.56 provides that this exception to the 180-day wait period shall not apply if the retiree accepts any retirement-related incentive; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova and William (Steve) Harriman certify that William (Steve) Harriman has not and will not receive a Golden Handshake or any other retirement related incentive; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova hereby appoints William (Steve) Harriman as an extra-help retired annuitant to perform the duties of the Program Manager to assist with the implementation of the new residential solid waste collection and street sweeping contract with Atlas Disposal beginning the week of January 6, 2025, and to train and onboard the new management Analyst II position in Public Works; and WHEREAS, the entire appointment document between William (Steve) Harriman and the City of Rancho Cordova has been reviewed by this body and is attached herein; and WHEREAS, no matters, issues, terms or conditions related to this employment and appointment have been or will be placed on a consent calendar; and WHEREAS, the employment shall be limited to 960 hours per fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and WHEREAS, the maximum base salary for the Program Manager position is $12,924.42 per month and the hourly equivalent is $74.57, and the minimum base salary for this position is $10,561.20 and the hourly equivalent is $60.93; and

Page 143 of 147 ends

ITEM 16.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No XX-2025 Page 2 of 2
WHEREAS, the hourly rate paid to William (Steve) Harriman will be $74.57; and WHEREAS, William (Steve) Harriman has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA hereby certifies the nature of the employment of William (Steve) Harriman as described herein and detailed in the attached appointment document and that this appointment is necessary to fill the critically needed position of Program Manager for the City of Rancho Cordova by January 6, 2025. The extra-help is needed to provide training to new staff and to manage the implementation of the new residential solid waste collection and street sweeping contract with Atlas Disposal beginning January 1, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of January 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Siri Pulipati, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 144 of 147 ends

Page 145 of 147 ends

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.4.

DATE: January 6, 2025

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Darcy Goulart, Community Development Director

SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POTENTIAL ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL

REGARDING THE REMOVAL OF A REGULAR PLANNING

COMMISSION MEMBER

RECOMMENDATION

There is no recommendation by staff. The City Council will discuss and potentially take action on the removal of a Regular Planning Commission member and could direct staff to proceed with the process of filling the vacant seat if needed.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

If the City Council, by a majority vote, removes a Regular Planning Commission Member, the position will become vacant. This would result in the reduction of the Planning Commission down to one regular member and two at-large members. The Planning Commission will not be able to meet for lack of a quorum until nominations are made and the new and/or re-appointed members are sworn in. It is anticipated that the renomination and selection of new member(s) will occur at the February 3, 2025, City Council meeting.

BACKGROUND

At the regular City Council meeting of December 16, 2024, a request was made by the Council to place a discussion item on a future agenda regarding the potential removal of a Regular Planning Commission member.

DISCUSSION

Chapter 2.30 Planning Commission of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code outlines various aspects of the Planning Commission, including removal. Section 2.30.050 states that a planning commissioner may be removed from office by the city council without cause, notice or hearing.

Upon conclusion of their discussion, the City Council could either take no action or by a majority vote, remove the regular planning commission member. If removed, the action is effective immediately and the seat will be vacated. This would result in the reduction of the Planning Commission down to one regular member and two at-large members, as three of the regular member terms expired December 2024. The Planning Commission will not be able to meet for lack of a quorum until nominations are made and the new and/or re-appointed members are sworn in. It is anticipated that the renomination and selection of new member(s) will occur at the February 3, 2025, City Council meeting.

Page 146 of 147 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

SUMMARY

In summary, if the City Council, by a majority vote, removes a regular planning commission member, the seat will become vacant. Nomination and selection of someone to fill the vacated seat will occur at the February 3, 2025 regular City Council meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENT(S)

None

Page 147 of 147 ends

Rancho Cordova City CouncilJanuary 6, 2025

Rancho Cordova City Council
January 6, 2025