Rancho Cordova City Council
July 6, 2026

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 072-0361-085-0000 GLENN AND LEANN RAE OSBORNE 2911 PLATINUM CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705625 739.06 072-0151-005-0000 TAMMY D YOUNG 2936 MILLS PARK DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705502 738.74 057-0010-057-0000 BARBARA G ALDEN 2360 RUDAT CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703946 691.33 067-2580-047-0000 BRITTANY SPRINGS 4431 DUCKHAWK CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 683.40 068-0513-022-0000 LYSHA J LEWIS 9717 WOODHOLLOW WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272722 682.23 068-0472-017-0000 SENGPHET PHIMMASENE 3200 SATURN DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272324 697.53 067-2390-005-0000 JASON PITTS 11986 ROQUEFORT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 748.05 077-0102-002-0000 BADIE BAHRAM PO BOX 661471 SACRAMENTO CA 958661471 666.55 072-3240-048-0000 CHARAN SODHI 11032 INTERNATIONAL DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956708004 692.74 067-1260-052-0000 RICARDO & HELENA MANCEBO 12719 THORNTONHALL DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426752 692.74 057-0253-006-0000 CHRISTINE MCVICKER 2713 CABERNET WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704811 660.62 077-0324-038-0000 JOSHUA LARSEN 10232 GOINYOUR WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272445 660.62 056-0133-001-0000 TAISIR SHURAFA 425 1ST ST UNIT 1304 SAN FRANCISCO CA 941054624 660.62 076-0235-004-0000 DYLAN HICKMAN/LAURA DAYTON 2573 LA CUMBRA CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703455 659.46 068-0480-062-0000 LYDIA V MAURITS 9933 BEXLEY DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272333 659.46 067-0490-012-0000 JOSEPH DEMITRO 11800 SLATE FALLS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428017 684.97 056-0310-045-0000 ANGELA & JOSEPH RIGDON 10079 KERN RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702711 683.80 057-0232-014-0000 GUADALUPE GARCIA/ JULIETA DE 5344 MARCONI AVE APT 205 CARMICHAEL CA 956084385 677.21 067-0500-008-0000 KEVIN & RICHELLE HOVER 11858 FIRE AGATE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428068 661.09 067-0540-071-0000 NILAMA PATEL 11721 VILLAGE POND WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 651.08 067-0800-102-0000 BENJAMIN AVILA 12212 CONSERVANCY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427763 651.08 056-0440-016-0000 MARIA SO 2234 GREEN BLOSSOM CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702345 651.08 068-0134-002-0000 REBECCA & ROGER HORNER 3417 COMET CT SACRAMENTO CA 958272924 651.08 067-0840-099-0000 PAUL & LINDA ROHRER 12309 MONTAUK WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427724 651.08 077-0132-019-0000 MARIA TERESA VIRGEN 2963 JOERGER ST RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705314 651.08 077-0290-045-0000 GARRET CHERI RANDALL 10080 BISCANEWOODS WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272331 651.08 067-0440-058-0000 MIAE JEON 11856 WHITE RAIN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428003 651.08 057-0095-017-0000 JEANNINE M OTTEN 9208 PORTO BELLA WAY ELK GROVE CA 956242118 651.08 072-2970-201-0000 TIM LEARD 3149 MINTURN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706271 651.08 067-0620-035-0000 DARLENE M GRAY 2021 E 22ND ST OAKLAND CA 946064118 651.08 067-0460-003-0000 MARSHA DEMAS 11895 AUTUMN SUNSET WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428009 651.08 068-0370-030-0000 MARCELL ALADO 9947 PALM GROVE DR SACRAMENTO CA 958273532 651.08 068-0364-044-0000 ERIC RAMOS 9914 PALM GROVE DR SACRAMENTO CA 958273533 651.08 067-0510-101-0000 HOWARD S LOUIE 11839 APPOLON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428074 651.08 072-2520-005-0000 WAHIDA TANIA 3285 OSELOT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706982 651.08 067-0490-005-0000 FEEROZ SAKHI 11828 SLATE FALLS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428017 651.08 072-2350-011-0000 ALEXANDER ILYUSHIN 11041 FIORE DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706945 651.08 072-2600-004-0000 ARTUR MANUKYAN 3533 RAINSONG CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706983 651.08 068-0492-014-0000 ALEX P THOMASON 3529 SUNRISE PINES DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272950 651.08 067-0710-030-0000 JOMELEYN FRANCISCO 5345 OTTER POND WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428157 651.08 077-0064-003-0000 KYLE & AMANDA ROBINSON 10408 WHITE ROCK RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705427 651.08 068-0125-004-0000 FRANKIE LY SINGH 10013 NEBULA WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272933 651.08 068-0134-001-0000 JAMICA F THOMAS 3423 JUPITER DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272965 651.08 058-0221-014-0000 JOHN ELLIS 10607 VIANI WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703934 651.08 072-2600-050-0000 BEN SCHARLACH 10882 WATERBROOK WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706993 651.08 057-0313-006-0000 TIFFANY AUBEL 2609 LUVETA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704914 651.08 067-0720-034-0000 DAVID VALLERGA 5420 MILL WATER CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428158 651.08 067-0540-077-0000 MONICA SAFFOLD 11751 VILLAGE POND WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428027 651.08 058-0171-006-0000 KARLEN NALBANDYAN 10717 CAMPANA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703915 651.08 077-0103-014-0000 ALBERT E GILDING JR 3028 PORTSMOUTH DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705321 651.08 057-0285-008-0000 JESSE C PALMER 2424 ARAMON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703803 651.08 077-0310-009-0000 YURI ZHUKOV & NINA TIMOFEYEVA 3242 FOLKLORE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272431 651.08 056-0310-054-0000 STEWART A JUDSON 10058 KERN RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702712 651.08 077-0221-020-0000 ALEXANDR & VALENTINA GAIDUCHIK 1844 PARK OAK DR ROSEVILLE CA 956614055 651.08 067-0710-086-0000 TIFFANY BAKER 5448 COPPER SUNSET WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428162 651.08 077-0250-048-0000 ALEX & YELENA MARTYNOVSKAYA 10100 COUNTRYSIDE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272416 651.08 056-0392-002-0000 JUSTINE MAC 1772 KLAMATH RIVER DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702735 651.08 067-0550-016-0000 CLAYTON REXROAT 11765 LOISDALE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 651.08 072-0362-026-0000 NORMAN HILL 2961 GWENDOLYN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 651.08 077-0235-004-0000 CHEN CUONG ENTERPRISES LLC 9993 WHIRL AWAY LN ELK GROVE CA 95624 651.08 077-0235-004-0000 CHEN CUONG ENTERPRISES LLC 9993 WHIRL AWAY LN ELK GROVE CA 95624 651.08 072-2970-236-0000 MOHAMMMAD R HARATI & FARZANEH 3168 BRIDGEWAY DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706246 651.08 077-0161-015-0000 ELIOT & STEPHANIE PETERS 10119 CRAWFORD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95827 651.08 076-0066-005-0000 UGRASEN CHIB 2439 MORAINE CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702022 651.08 072-2970-203-0000 RYAN HOLLOWAY 532 UNION ST #608 OAKLAND CA 94607 651.08

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 077-0166-030-0000 BENJAMIN JOHNSON & JOHN DAY 3366 GLENMOOR DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272437 651.08 056-0310-015-0000 GUNVOR S & NILS A SOMMERHAUG 2217 BROAD RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702702 651.08 077-0152-023-0000 DOMINGO CARDOZA 10480 ABBOTTFORD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705839 651.08 067-0520-006-0000 SHUBPREET SANDHU 11952 PERICLES DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428078 651.08 068-0444-002-0000 ALEJANDRO CISNEROS/MONICA TAPI 3208 EXPLORER DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272809 651.08 058-0380-006-0000 ADAM B BECK 2256 WINDWARD LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704220 651.08 056-0122-004-0000 KATINA BOYER & JAMES B FRANK 2114 FORESTLAKE DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702409 651.08 072-3230-013-0000 LESLYE JONES 10958 INTERNATIONAL DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956708000 651.08 072-2100-032-0000 ALEX THOI 10921 BELLONE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706919 651.08 067-0700-073-0000 ERNESTO/ALEJANDRINA VELAZQUEZ 4819 COPPER SUNSET WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427796 651.08 068-0431-007-0000 JAMEEL TAYYEB 9792 RED CEDAR CIR SACRAMENTO CA 958272815 651.08 077-0191-015-0000 DON HAY 5250 PACIFIC ST SUITE A ROCKLIN CA 956772756 651.08 077-0191-024-0000 RUTH A WRIGHT 6909 MAITA CIR SACRAMENTO CA 958202111 651.08 077-0192-010-0000 HUGH & LUCILLE FULGHAM 10140 REBA CT SACRAMENTO CA 958272407 651.08 077-0192-022-0000 AULAH M BOSTICK 3332 GOULD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272458 651.08 077-0113-017-0000 STACEY A BASE 10467 ABBOTTFORD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705801 651.08 075-0154-006-0000 ARBIN KUMAR 7593 SANGIOVESE DR EL DORADO HILLS CA 957627727 651.08 075-0154-006-0000 ARBIN KUMAR 7593 SANGIOVESE DR EL DORADO HILLS CA 957627727 651.08 058-0510-003-0000 TAMMY HOANG 2438 KAYWOOD CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704234 651.08 068-0366-028-0000 LAURIE SMITH & BARBARA SCHERER 9923 OLD PLACERVILLE RD SACRAMENTO CA 958273531 651.08 057-0092-012-0000 ANGELA LEE 2616 VERDELLO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703614 651.08 058-0115-012-0000 JAMAL J MAULE 10840 BALLANTRAE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704934 651.08 072-2990-024-0000 FREIDBERG LAW CORP PSP 2443 FAIR OAKS BLVD SACRAMENTO CA 958257684 651.08 077-0171-017-0000 IRINA M PETRASHISHINA 6576 THALIA WAY CITRUS HEIGHTS CA 956215593 651.08 077-0171-017-0000 IRINA M PETRASHISHINA 6576 THALIA WAY CITRUS HEIGHTS CA 956215593 651.08 072-0202-014-0000 TIMOTHY BAKER 10556 SILVERWOOD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705532 651.08 058-0182-017-0000 ANDRIA LLOYD/EDWIN C & NANCY A 10819 GADSTEN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705101 651.08 068-0142-028-0000 JENNIFER CARTER 9845 LINCOLN VILLAGE DR SACRAMENTO CA 958273401 651.08 072-3260-002-0000 VINCENT AYALA 3253 GOSPORT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956708019 651.08 072-3290-022-0000 JESS CLUSTER 3282 PROSPECT PARK DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 651.08 057-0143-002-0000 KHALID HAMID 10471 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703648 651.08 056-0410-012-0000 QUANG T PHAM 11140 RHINE RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 651.08 058-0126-001-0000 SHANE ENGSTROM 10842 WALNUTWOOD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705143 651.08 068-0137-001-0000 NORMA ORTIZ & MARIA GARCIA 1529 36TH ST SACRAMENTO CA 958166608 651.08 072-1340-031-0000 KELLY DRISKELL 10579 RAGTIME CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956707331 651.08 072-0320-010-0000 CARL & REBECCA GEORGE 10649 OLSON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705619 651.08 076-0270-005-0000 ALYA ALNASSIRY 10115 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703311 651.08 077-0234-003-0000 HUGO RODRIGUEZ QUINTERO 3196 LAURELHURST DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705741 651.08 077-0166-007-0000 GRADY DILLENBURG 6869 PENN DR DUBLIN CA 94568 651.08 077-0166-007-0000 JUDY DILLENBURG 10154 DE SOTO WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272404 651.08 058-0480-008-0000 LEO J LEVAC 2302 SUMMERFIELD CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704215 651.08 072-0172-016-0000 TRUONG C VO & NGUYEN NGUYEN 10539 MARCEL WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 651.08 076-0093-023-0000 PRUDENCIL MARTINEZ 10347 HOLMES WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702016 651.08 077-0152-012-0000 ANT PROPERTIES INC 2880 SUNRISE BLVD SUITE 110 RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426547 651.08 072-0173-006-0000 KEY RENTAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3508 CODY WAY SUITE 250 SACRAMENTO CA 958641540 651.08 058-0041-011-0000 MAXERO TRUST/JORGE BARBA 2386 FRUITRIDGE RD SACRAMENTO CA 958223148 651.08 057-0043-008-0000 SURINDER OBEROI & NI M SUMIATI 10606 BECLAN DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703807 651.08 076-0131-021-0000 SALVADOR MENDOZA 10301 COLOMA RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702103 651.08 076-0091-001-0000 VIKRANT V DESSAI & SHWETA S 10300 BRENDA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702003 651.08 072-2870-044-0000 MICHAEL DRAYTON 12766 EVANSTON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427803 651.08 072-3410-004-0000 CARINE NAZHA 1015 HAYES ST UNIT B SAN FRANCISCO CA 941171621 651.08 072-2880-025-0000 ANDREW TONGONAN 12666 SOLSBERRY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427840 651.08 072-2980-030-0000 ANTHONY STUBBLEFIELD 11059 INTERNATIONAL DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706252 651.08 067-1130-133-0000 BRITTANY BELL 12748 CORDYLINE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426725 651.08 057-0111-034-0000 CHRISTOPHER SARCONA/AMANDA 10557 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703751 651.08 077-0300-014-0000 ROBERT SHARRATT JR 3205 HOGARTH DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272345 651.08 076-0270-027-0000 JULIA JOHNSON PO BOX 392 RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95741 651.08 072-2960-061-0000 NORMAN FUJIWARA 3807 IVAN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426701 651.08 077-0092-004-0000 JOSEPH IRELAND 409 SAFFLOWER PL WEST SACRAMENTO CA 95691 651.08 077-0260-015-0000 BENNIE ROBINSON JR 10263 ELLENWOOD AVE SACRAMENTO CA 958273004 651.08 067-1130-157-0000 JAMES P CHICO 4086 MACKERRICHER WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426733 651.08 072-2520-027-0000 EDWARD REGAN 3300 OSELOT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706979 651.08 056-0290-005-0000 TRENT E HOSKINS 11232 SAUK RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702914 651.08 077-0290-029-0000 RHONDA J BALDO 10048 VIEWOODS CT SACRAMENTO CA 958272330 651.08 076-0201-004-0000 MOHAMMAD SEERAT 2712 PASEO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703435 651.08

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 067-0920-062-0000 KIMBERLY&ANDREW GIRARDI/ 11782 PLATO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428107 651.08 067-0920-050-0000 BRANDIN FOREMAN 11785 PLATO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428107 651.08 057-0173-015-0000 CHASE DAVIS & ASHLEY RICE 2663 BARBERA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703743 651.08 077-0154-008-0000 ROBERT MCDONALDS 14 BINACA CT SACRAMENTO CA 958331136 651.08 056-0340-032-0000 KIM GIVENS PO BOX 266 RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957410266 651.08 067-1210-036-0000 ADAM ZECIRI 4289 PRIVAS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428244 651.08 072-3230-045-0000 STANLEY MCDOWELL PO BOX 611664 SAN JOSE CA 951611664 651.08 056-0151-015-0000 YUNYUN TAO & LIBO WENG 2040 KELLOGG WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702435 651.08 077-0154-008-0000 ROBERT MCDONALDS 14 BINACA CT SACRAMENTO CA 958331136 651.08 072-0154-011-0000 JOSHUA BRANT 2929 MILLS PARK DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705501 651.08 072-0363-018-0000 AN T & DANG NGUYEN 2934 GWENDOLYN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 651.08 067-1130-154-0000 THALIA EVANS 4074 MACKERRICHER WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426733 651.08 056-0391-004-0000 JOHN TENEYUCA 11008 WABASH RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702728 651.08 056-0424-010-0000 DAVID A MUNOZ 2238 PALMWOOD CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702314 651.08 058-0320-016-0000 MONIQUE MOON 2201 ELMCREST LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704207 651.08 056-0101-023-0000 ADRIAN RONDAN 10612 AVERELL CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702304 651.08 058-0152-008-0000 HRIPSIME & DAVID MANUKYAN 2356 BYRD DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703956 651.08 077-0132-012-0000 JEOVANY JIMENEZ 10361 CARDIFF WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705309 651.08 067-1230-004-0000 CHRYSANTHY PREMIER LLC 11900 MIRCADO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428250 651.08 072-3250-051-0000 NOUZAT KANBAR 3254 CORRELL WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956708038 651.08 056-0385-002-0000 DENISE & PETER LOPEZ JR 1453 KLAMATH RIVER DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702848 651.08 068-0346-016-0000 NATHAN DOBBS 10036 VANGUARD DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272329 651.08 056-0082-003-0000 BERNARD JACOBS 10482 ROSE HILL CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702230 651.08 068-0460-003-0000 GUADALUPE & ALONDRA PAREDES 3430 GRANBY DR SACRAMENTO CA 958273521 651.08 072-2530-025-0000 ERIC STEPHENS 3370 MARQUAM WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706958 651.08 072-0191-012-0000 MELISSA & JESUS BARAJAS 3020 MILLS PARK DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705504 651.08 075-0341-007-0000 MICHELE DROLETTE 2213 EL CEJO CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703121 651.08 067-1130-046-0000 DERRICK WILSON 12752 GLASS BEACH DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426735 651.08 056-0191-006-0000 HYUN J A LEE & JU H KANG 10609 AMBASSADOR DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702403 651.08 067-0450-113-0000 EDWARD CASS 52A DOMINGA AVE FAIRFAX CA 94930 651.08 056-0350-011-0000 SERENA A WEHRLI 11185 QUEBEC RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702936 651.08 067-2470-005-0000 SURJIT KAILEY 12142 ALAMOSA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426784 651.08 056-0102-008-0000 REINA B CHAVEZ AND FRANCISCA 2237 ROSSMOOR DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702305 651.08 067-0550-044-0000 TERRENCE RICHARDSON 4116 WOOD SPICE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428031 651.08 067-1340-018-0000 ALAN KAUTTI 12833 SCHOLARLY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426927 651.08 067-0560-079-0000 ESSONO F EKALE 11762 ARETE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428045 651.08 072-1340-043-0000 ERICA E PARKER 10544 RAGTIME CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956707329 651.08 057-0051-006-0000 SHRADER FAMILY TRUST 10423 DOLECETTO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 651.08 067-2440-074-0000 AMIT KUMAR 4248 CROSSROADS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426799 651.08 067-0450-014-0000 CORNELIA DOSTY 11761 AZALEA GARDEN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428047 651.08 058-0330-022-0000 JOSHUA & ROXANNE PERRY 2218 KIMWOOD LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704210 651.08 058-0211-001-0000 EVA M & ERNEST R MONTES 10660 COLOMA RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703937 651.08 057-0141-021-0000 JAVIER M LUJANO 10240 COLOMA RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703606 651.08 067-1230-029-0000 CHRISTIAN BALUYUT 879 BRUNSWICK ST DALY CITY CA 940141347 651.08 057-0252-002-0000 MELISA D/SCOTT MCKENZIE & 2716 CABERNET WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704812 651.08 058-0400-043-0000 BRADLEY D NYE P. O. BOX 1536 RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95741 651.08 056-0250-028-0000 RICHARD A GIVENS 10641 COLOMA RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703938 651.08 075-0700-018-0000 MATTHEW L SCHULZE 2825 TIFFANY WEST WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958271419 651.08 056-0250-045-0000 LORRAINE KRUEGER 7819 CLAYPOOL WAY CITRUS HEIGHTS CA 956102706 651.08 057-0010-034-0000 MARIO LA SCHIAZZA 2325 RUDAT CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703929 651.08 067-1360-054-0000 JALAL SIDDIQUI 12664 MONTEREY PINE AVE RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 651.08 067-2590-045-0000 SUNRIDGE VILLAS PROPERTY LLC 11628 FIORENZA LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 651.08 057-0145-009-0000 MARIO R FUNES 10432 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703608 651.08 057-0151-009-0000 ASSET INVESTMENT MANAGERS INC 10512 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703604 651.08 057-0285-007-0000 JOSIE M BRYANT 2422 ARAMON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703803 651.08 067-0540-066-0000 GARRETT GATEWOOD 4067 COPPER LAKE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428026 651.08 058-0073-005-0000 KALATRI M CAISE 2325 PINTURO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705229 651.08 058-0103-001-0000 TROY J MARILAO 2339 SONATA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705246 651.08 067-0660-034-0000 JOSEANNA LIM 4098 KALAMATA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428004 651.08 077-0340-004-0000 ROBERT J HILDITCH 3051 LAURELHURST DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705710 651.08 057-0272-009-0000 JAMIE MACH 8921 BEDFORD AVE FAIR OAKS CA 956284026 651.08 058-0152-011-0000 HELEN FONG SAUCEDO/BRYAN 2370 BYRD DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703956 651.08 058-0221-030-0000 JOSEPH CHR GARCIA 10686 AUDUBON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703942 651.08 058-0223-017-0000 ROBERT CHA EDWARDS 2371 CORDOVA LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703917 651.08 058-0330-010-0000 TRUST OF PAUR 2203 KIMWOOD LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704209 651.08

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 058-0340-006-0000 RAMIN NADERI 255 SUNGATE CT VACAVILLE CA 956888527 651.08 072-0134-025-0000 SAMUEL REED 2947 EVADNA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705406 651.08 067-0770-092-0000 DEHUA WANG/ XIAOLONG XU 11829 EVERDELL WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428100 651.08 067-0490-016-0000 MICHAEL OFFIAH 4228 TOPAZ VALLEY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428023 651.08 068-0420-080-0000 LARRY W RUSHING 3332 FELTHAM WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272314 651.08 068-0420-086-0000 OANH NGUYEN 3308 FELTHAM WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272314 651.08 068-0443-023-0000 DANIEL L HENRY 9812 GARDENWOOD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272811 651.08 068-0472-009-0000 SONI JOHNSON PO BOX 1351 ALAMEDA CA 945010144 651.08 068-0513-003-0000 JAMES M KRAUS 15265 WINCHESTER BLVD #7W LOS GATOS CA 950302359 651.08 076-0103-005-0000 ERIC MORRISON 10252 LOS PALOS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703442 651.08 076-0164-025-0000 ANDREW J GEORGI 10201 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703369 651.08 076-0243-007-0000 MITSUE BETZ 2424 EL CHICO CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703124 651.08 076-0270-007-0000 PATRICIA M SMITH 10119 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703311 651.08 077-0064-016-0000 JULIE M MANZANARES 10431 BLACKBURN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705305 651.08 077-0073-020-0000 LISA ANDERSON & LORIA MARTIN 3073 SWANSEA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705349 651.08 077-0112-005-0000 VICTOR A SIMS 1300 LOS MOLINOS WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958642952 651.08 068-0072-004-0000 ROY COLLINS 9912 NEBULA WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272914 651.08 077-0113-026-0000 GERTRUDE MITCHELL 10425 ABBOTTFORD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705801 651.08 077-0152-022-0000 JOHNNIE R BRANNON 10449 ROCKINGHAM DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705827 651.08 077-0280-041-0000 ROBERT BOTTOMS 10126 COUNTRY WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272412 651.08 072-0202-036-0000 RUZANNA KARAPETYAN 10538 SILVERWOOD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705532 651.08 077-0221-011-0000 MARIA DEL CARMEN & RICARDO 3245 SANBURY CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705720 651.08 068-0347-015-0000 MARIO LOPEZ 10005 VANGUARD DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272328 651.08 068-0350-005-0000 ORAWAN SYNHORST 10033 BEXLEY DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272301 651.08 056-0392-008-0000 MARIAN HITCHINGS 1804 KLAMATH RIVER DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702811 651.08 068-0441-017-0000 ROB CLARK 3153 EXPLORER DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272831 651.08 057-0163-005-0000 EMILIO & GUADALUPE RAMIREZ 9461 TWIN LAKES AVE ORANGEVALE CA 956625422 651.08 075-0191-003-0000 BADIE BAHRAM PO BOX 661471 SACRAMENTO CA 958661471 651.08 076-0203-008-0000 WANDA COPELAND 2736 LOS AMIGOS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703431 651.08 056-0063-008-0000 ROBERT P CALLAHAN TRUST 2149 DANBURY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702271 651.08 056-0424-014-0000 LUCY TURNER 2254 PALMWOOD CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702314 651.08 072-2090-040-0000 WAYNE C HERNANDEZ 3248 ABOTO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706925 651.08 058-0031-002-0000 JAIME MIRANDA 2606 BETSY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704940 651.08 057-0052-012-0000 JENNIFER BOTTIMORE 2512 TORMOLO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703631 651.08 056-0370-048-0000 DAVID CHAPMAN 11118 CONCORD RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702835 651.08 067-1090-005-0000 KEITH M REESE 4251 ORPHEUS CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428212 681.42 067-2480-051-0000 KOBI KATAYANAG 4198 AURA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 681.24 077-0173-006-0000 ROWIE JARON 10409 GOLD EXPRESS DR # 310/330 GOLD RIVER CA 95670 647.57 056-0290-037-0000 TOPORISTE GHERGHINA 2140 KLAMATH RIVER DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702929 676.50 068-0441-036-0000 TYLER FACKRELL & OCTAVIO VELEZ 3205 RUSTICWOOD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272816 643.49 067-2600-064-0000 SUNRIDGE VILLAS PROPERTY LLC 11648 FIORENZA LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 660.54 067-0440-048-0000 MICHAEL MCKEE 11883 HERODIAN DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428000 635.24 076-0133-014-0000 MARK B THOMAS 10370 DOLECETTO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703545 635.24 068-0111-012-0000 WILFREDO BRILLIANTES 3408 JUPITER DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272930 601.59 067-0560-024-0000 SARA MEZHLUMYAN 4407 NIOBE CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428044 624.89 067-2620-054-0000 ANGELITA GARCIA 12756 SPOTTED WREN CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 624.89 072-2950-030-0000 JOHN P & CHONGE A TRIBUIANO 12579 BELLMEAD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427793 624.89 067-0840-010-0000 DAVID & MONICA HUIZAR 4077 BIG MEADOW WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427741 624.89 058-0223-021-0000 ELISABETH NIDOY 2353 CORDOVA LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703917 624.89 057-0161-006-0000 YOUNG & YEON KIM 2620 RIBIER WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703716 624.89 076-0234-009-0000 RICARDO SILVA & CYNTHIA ROJAS 2548 LA CUMBRA CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703456 624.89 057-0311-015-0000 BROOKE KENT 2406 CARIEL CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704924 623.74 057-0010-037-0000 MARK & SVETLANA PANASYUK 2337 RUDAT CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703929 649.06 057-0111-029-0000 CARLOS & LEA HERNANDEZ 2620 SARDA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703722 571.16 056-0421-002-0000 KEATON VAN PATTEN/KAELAN GOMES 2337 MILLS RANCH WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702337 585.22 067-0560-047-0000 MOHAMMAD & NARGIS ZAHIDI 3430 SUNRISE BLVD STE 1 RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427352 577.59 057-0064-012-0000 DAVID BLACK 2521 FURMINT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703619 547.61 072-0361-075-0000 JOHN E SPENCER JR 2909 GWENDOLYN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705611 547.61 077-0322-004-0000 ASIM SHAH 3317 NUT PLAINS DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272440 547.61 076-0054-007-0000 ROBERTA L TWEEDY 2229 MAXINE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702018 547.61 072-2990-096-0000 JENAE ALECHKO 3112 EADES WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706279 547.61 067-0590-075-0000 ALAN R GIBLIN 4300 HARTLAND WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428082 547.61 057-0142-009-0000 RICHARD F VANDAGRIFF JR 10431 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703649 547.61 072-2970-206-0000 JENNIFER SANGUINO 3139 MINTURN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706271 547.61 058-0480-014-0000 LUANN SMITH PO BOX 277407 SACRAMENTO CA 95827 547.61

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 056-0152-012-0000 NICKOLAS DIMITRIADIS PO BOX 1688 FAIR OAKS CA 956281688 547.61 076-0252-012-0000 RICHARD SEARS 2405 LA LOMA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703412 547.61 068-0520-022-0000 TAH 2018-1 BORROWER LLC 9752 GREENSBORO CIR SACRAMENTO CA 958272713 547.61 068-0123-010-0000 AMANDA ELSBERRY 9936 METEOR DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272912 547.61 067-0550-082-0000 HEELAY & OBAIDULLAH SADIQI 11746 BAGOTA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 547.61 056-0072-008-0000 VALENTIN SLIVINSKIY 10482 AMBASSADOR DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702272 547.61 077-0380-020-0000 LOURDES NABABAN 3557 MADDIEWOOD CIR SACRAMENTO CA 958273067 547.61 068-0444-014-0000 WESLEY P WEIGLE 9833 CRIMSONWOOD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272806 547.61 077-0105-004-0000 NICHOLAS VERES THOMAS 3017 WINCHESTER WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705338 547.61 075-0720-018-0000 BRIAN T BATES 10015 KINGFISHER WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703190 547.61 058-0390-057-0002 ROBERTA CRAZE 7125 FAIR OAKS BLVD APT 425 CARMICHAEL CA 95608 547.61 072-2920-006-0000 SUSAN MONTANA 3732 EDINGTON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427829 547.61 077-0370-010-0000 TANA J BUNDITRUTAVORN 3452 MISTY MORNING CIR SACRAMENTO CA 958273052 547.61 072-2600-047-0000 DAVID S GERGI 10870 WATERBROOK WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706993 547.61 067-0500-019-0000 PAUL KURIAN/BEULAH VEJENDLA 11883 FIRE AGATE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428068 547.61 058-0500-017-0000 DALONNA BUTLER 11105 WOODKIRK CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704238 547.61 056-0280-022-0000 BELINDA WEBBER 11220 RUSSIAN RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702924 547.61 067-0920-070-0000 DEREK MOOK 3988 ARISTOTLE CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428105 547.61 068-0143-007-0000 JUAN AND SELENA ROCHA 3416 VIKING DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272836 547.61 068-0143-007-0000 JUAN AND SELENA ROCHA 3418 VIKING DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272836 547.61 072-2940-038-0000 EUGHENII MAZUR/SVETLANA MOORE 12571 SOLSBERRY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427786 547.61 072-2980-054-0000 CHE-HUNG LIU 10962 STOURPORT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706249 547.61 067-0570-020-0000 JIE HU & BRADY MCMICKEN 11748 DIONYSUS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428041 547.61 057-0285-003-0000 CHRISTINA MORROW 2410 ARAMON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703803 547.61 067-1240-045-0000 SURINDER K GREWAL 12709 TOWER BEACH CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426759 547.61 067-0770-069-0000 OM KANNUSAMI 11836 WINDHAM WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428099 547.61 056-0084-001-0000 TOSHIKO CONNER PO BOX 8531 CITRUS HEIGHTS CA 956218531 547.61 056-0143-004-0000 FIDEL VAZQUEZ 10804 AMBASSADOR DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702430 547.61 068-0420-037-0000 SUNDER & ASHA SINGH 3333 HOGARTH DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272315 547.61 056-0270-020-0000 HELEN HUMMEL 2258 RIVER TRAILS CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702257 547.61 057-0263-010-0000 BARBARA G LAKE 10571 ZIBIBBA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703826 547.61 058-0102-008-0000 DELORIS R JOHNSON 2393 PINTURO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705248 547.61 058-0380-018-0000 M E HEINEKE 2253 WINDWARD LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704219 547.61 072-0320-020-0000 JOHN E KURAKO & SPENCER KURAKO 2916 CALLE DEL SOL WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703508 547.61 068-0364-024-0000 DNA ENT LLC 9963 BURLINE ST SACRAMENTO CA 958273544 547.61 076-0073-007-0000 TRUST OF BARKEY 2248 CHASE DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702040 547.61 077-0152-026-0000 CAROL L BERGSTROM 10490 DREXEL CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705812 547.61 057-0054-004-0000 GEORGE TUCKER 2518 GANZAN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703624 547.61 072-1350-068-0000 DAVID GIN 10706 BASIE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956707317 547.61 076-0202-008-0000 JACQUELINE PRICE 28 VILLA GARDENS CT ROSEVILLE CA 95678 547.61 077-0102-006-0000 CINDY TAYLOR 3020 RAMSGATE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705327 562.59 067-2600-033-0000 SUNRIDGE VILLAS PROPERTY LLC 11672 GIACINTA LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 560.65 067-0560-061-0000 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 11714 KOUROS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428046 560.65 057-0162-010-0000 ANGEL AMAYA 2712 ARAMON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704802 560.65 056-0151-011-0000 VITALIY & LYUDMILA BOBYLEV 2024 KELLOGG WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702435 571.73 072-2960-053-0000 VICTORIA VIDAL 3835 IVAN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 536.08 056-0113-004-0000 JOHN KEVIN MCCANTS 2118 STARRLYN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702234 536.08 057-0191-006-0000 JOHN MCCANTS 2118 STARRLYN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702234 536.08 076-0164-020-0000 RICHARD E WAITE 10213 LAS TUNAS CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703310 536.08 072-0135-007-0000 MARK JONES 2955 SHAWN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705436 534.89 067-2540-051-0000 SCHIN GUPTA 4352 ARCTIC TERN CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 539.47 067-1230-055-0000 CHRISTINA GRIFFITH 11953 MONTRON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428242 552.32 056-0041-002-0000 ATHENA MARKHAM 10423 GEORGETOWN DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702216 560.65 072-3400-002-0000 IRENE HERNANDEZ 3560 SPOTO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706433 507.33 068-0364-043-0000 KAREN LEARDINI 9910 PALM GROVE DR SACRAMENTO CA 958273533 507.33 057-0111-026-0000 LORENA MARTINEZ 2536 SARDA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 538.38 075-0292-007-0000 VALERIE & MICHAEL DUENAS 2459 EL BURLON CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703115 537.49 077-0172-020-0000 JOEL LEEK 10409 BUENA PLAZA CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705403 503.73 058-0420-011-0000 SANTIAGO TAPIA AND VAN C 2656 LOS NOGALES WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705140 500.11 058-0046-006-0000 PATRICK WILLIAMS 2601 MCGREGOR DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705130 520.24 068-0084-010-0000 RAPHAEL NATHAN 9951 LINCOLN VILLAGE DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272957 520.24 067-1240-043-0000 AMBER JAMES 12717 TOWER BEACH CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426759 520.17 056-0091-002-0000 CHRISTINA LAXTON 2117 FARNSWORTH WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702214 487.78 072-2080-010-0000 AMANDA S DE ROMERO & RUBEN A R 10995 FABER WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706917 467.11 072-0192-012-0000 PATRICIA SYKES 10526 SILVERWOOD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705519 480.15

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 077-0103-009-0000 PATIENCE MABRAY 3008 PORTSMOUTH DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705321 478.58 056-0132-009-0000 TERI SMITH 2107 KELLOGG WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702436 478.58 067-0670-052-0000 JOSAIA HUGHES 5510 JADE SPRINGS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 504.71 057-0104-002-0000 KYLE & KAELI DEANNA 2560 RIBIER WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703714 504.71 067-2390-017-0000 SCOTT SACKETT 11978 ARMANDI WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 504.71 058-0042-026-0000 FREDDIE L BRAY 10813 ALANDALE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705005 504.71 058-0191-020-0000 KEVIN & ROSALEE MAY 10621 BISCAY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703909 504.14 057-0151-012-0000 KELLY LINN 2608 MORETTO CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703625 470.21 067-0860-059-0000 CRYSTAL VARGAS 4182 BORDERLANDS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427752 470.21 067-2600-035-0000 SUNRIDGE VILLAS PROPERTY LLC PO BOX 34432 CHARLOTTE NC 28234 470.21 076-0074-009-0000 AMARYLLIS KELLEY 10333 BRENDA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702002 470.21 056-0061-015-0000 BRIAN GARCIA 10451 AMBASSADOR DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702279 470.21 072-2970-007-0000 FAYE & RILE BENFORD 1907 IRIS AVE SACRAMENTO CA 95815 470.21 058-0400-075-0000 PURE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3100 ZINFANDEL DR STE 285 RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 470.21 057-0092-022-0000 JOHN TORNELLO 2605 TRONERO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703611 470.21 068-0071-008-0000 LESLIE TERRELL 9929 NEBULA WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272913 470.21 067-0920-013-0000 YOUNG & WOO H KIM 3954 ARISTOTLE CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428105 470.21 067-1130-077-0000 AUSTEN FACINO 12757 LA GRANADA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426728 470.21 067-1210-023-0000 KIA BREWER 11991 MIRCADO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428254 470.21 056-0125-001-0000 ROBERT HEN SMITH 2129 KELLOGG WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702452 470.21 056-0300-015-0000 RICK MCGREEVY 10073 FRASER RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702706 470.21 067-2610-023-0000 WALTER BRIGHT 4336 PAWCATUCK WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427738 470.21 057-0286-001-0000 GREGORY CAMPION 2404 NEGRARA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703823 470.21 057-0074-009-0000 ISABEL CAMPOS 10566 MALVASIA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703747 470.21 058-0216-016-0000 CHRIS THOMAS 2321 MCGREGOR DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703926 464.58 076-0131-004-0000 JALEN AND AYANA ANGEL 10333 DOLECETTO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703507 460.00 057-0145-011-0000 JIN YONG 10440 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703608 453.40 058-0216-002-0000 NAZAR LIVING TRUST 1040 DEER CREEK CT PLEASANTON CA 945663446 449.83 072-3920-044-0000 RODNEY FOX 3009 ATIRRO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 431.74 056-0081-013-0000 CHRISTINA M COOPER 10467 RUGBY CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702231 471.18 056-0081-016-0000 MITCHELL GAVINO 10461 GEORGETOWN DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702264 576.33 067-2470-039-0000 JAMES DIXON 12189 PAINT HORSE CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 434.61 077-0133-016-0000 ESAM JABER 2995 JOERGER ST RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705356 425.62 072-1970-027-0000 SUK M LEE 10860 BIANCO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706900 409.61 072-0361-060-0000 MARCEL VALIM 10874 PAIUTE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705630 409.61 058-0061-008-0000 DAVE APODACA 2256 BENITA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704009 478.94 067-0890-035-0000 XIANG LI 12280 HABITAT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427704 452.39 056-0370-022-0000 DOUGLAS PRICE 11083 ROANOKE RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702823 421.08 067-1260-013-0000 TIMOTHY GILBOY 12731 MONTBROOK WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426751 421.08 072-0310-053-0000 BEVERLY FLETCHER 2948 KACHINA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705634 421.08 068-0438-014-0000 JAMES G STEEN 3328 VIKING DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272819 421.08 057-0151-019-0000 MICHAEL E FORD 10543 SALTANA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703626 421.08 067-1350-141-0000 RAVI PAMPANA 2103 ADMIRALTY LN FOSTER CITY CA 944041624 420.03 067-0450-092-0000 GRACE MUNGATI 11773 LILAC CANYON CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428051 419.89 056-0072-001-0000 SHIRLEY CAMPION 10401 HOLLYDALE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702218 395.49 067-2500-015-0000 CARL WHITE 12257 COAL CREEK WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 395.49 077-0221-009-0000 VALENTIN SLIVINSKIY 3237 SANBURY CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705720 395.49 058-0121-006-0000 BETTY J JOHNSON 2313 ZINFANDEL DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704925 391.69 075-0152-002-0000 JAZMIN WHITE & TROY WATTS 10160 LA GLORIA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703113 380.14 058-0182-015-0000 MICHAEL & DANIELLE COLASANTI 10831 GADSTEN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705101 571.99 072-2940-023-0000 KARLA GAMA 12575 THORNBERG WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427788 385.11 057-0131-009-0000 ANTHONY & JOSE BARCELOS 2501 ARAMON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703804 379.78 056-0383-013-0000 TROY BACCUS 1448 KLAMATH RIVER DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702844 379.78 057-0051-008-0000 JUAN SALMERON LAINEZMARIA SAL 10431 DOLECETTO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703601 379.78 068-0137-013-0000 VIOREL CHICU & ELENA MIHNEA 2620 HURLEY WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958643789 379.78 068-0137-013-0000 VIOREL CHICU & ELENA MIHNEA 2620 HURLEY WAY B SACRAMENTO CA 958643789 379.78 077-0073-001-0000 EPIGEMENIO MARCOS 3156 PORTSMOUTH DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705346 379.78 057-0041-011-0000 ALEXANDER E OSEJO & MARIA ZUNO 10601 LAMBRUSCA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703815 379.78 067-1150-029-0000 DARIUS WILSON 12758 BLUEBLANC WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 379.78 077-0324-040-0000 LEE L WILLIAMS 3600 WINTHROP DR APT 4102 LEXINGTON KY 40514 379.78 067-1220-053-0000 MAQUEDA BUFORD 11913 MONTRON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428241 379.78 058-0102-011-0000 AIRIKA L & JORGE F BARRIENTOS 2367 PINTURO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705248 379.78 057-0063-005-0000 HORTENSIA ROBLES 2522 FURMINT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 379.78 067-2540-071-0000 PAULA MORGAN 4317 ARCTIC TERN CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 379.78 057-0161-022-0000 JOHN B DOUGLAS 2601 FURMINT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703621 379.78

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 057-0232-013-0000 TRUST OF RIBIER PO BOX 72802 DAVIS CA 956172802 379.78 058-0093-002-0000 ERNEST J LUJAN 10906 ANZA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704102 379.78 058-0115-003-0000 KENT M GARY 10804 BALLANTRAE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704934 377.98 058-0480-010-0000 MONIQUE RANDALL 2309 SUMMERFIELD CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704215 404.16 068-0093-003-0000 JAMES T WILSON 9946 REDSTONE DR SACRAMENTO CA 958273551 372.78 072-2880-014-0000 RANDY CUELLAR 12627 SOLSBERRY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 401.35 056-0034-012-0000 JAMES FRANCE III/DAJEAN HORGER 2205 RIVER EDGE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702226 383.70 068-0142-014-0000 ALEXANDRA SKAARER 9848 LIBRA AVE SACRAMENTO CA 95827 366.25 067-0890-039-0000 SUSAN & RAYMOND WHITE 12296 HABITAT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427704 363.58 058-0191-014-0000 GUSTAVO VILLANUEAVA 10645 BISCAY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703959 363.58 076-0132-001-0000 MICHAEL V LOCKE JR 10364 DOLECETTO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703551 363.58 072-2890-038-0000 LISA & RAMIRO QUIROZ 12709 SOLSBERRY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427807 363.40 067-0720-008-0000 AMNEET BHALLA 5221 OTTER POND WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428171 393.67 077-0192-022-0000 AULAH M BOSTICK 3332 GOULD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272458 355.21 067-0560-121-0000 ALI WOOLF 4382 NIOBE CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428043 378.53 058-0214-003-0000 DACIA OSTRANDER 10745 CARLOS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704003 378.53 067-0590-091-0000 MARIA & EUFRONIO CARASCO 3030 HANNA CT CARMICHAEL CA 95608 378.53 072-0310-009-0000 LEONARDO & LIZBETH BALLESTEROS 10732 PAIUTE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705622 378.53 067-2580-026-0000 MATTHEW TORRES 4526 DUCKHAWK CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 378.53 067-0840-112-0000 JENNIFER BUERGLER 12330 CANYONLANDS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427709 378.21 068-0135-017-0000 JERRIE J SAID SR 10098 NEBULA WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272975 334.83 068-0454-014-0000 DYLAN ZHU 3941 PARK DR STE 20-481 EL DORADO HILLS CA 957624549 319.42 077-0145-012-0000 MARIA ARACELI NEGRETE 4036 KALAMATA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428004 319.42 076-0146-018-0000 PAOLO BARROGA 2617 EL SEGUNDO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703405 319.42 072-2600-006-0000 RAVI THANGAPPAN 3525 RAINSONG CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706983 317.61 067-2430-026-0000 DAVID SARGSYAN 11939 ROQUEFORT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 356.18 068-0493-037-0000 CASSANDRA LARSEN 3553 SCORPIO DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272938 324.94 076-0101-014-0000 DALE & JOLINE LAYTON 10213 LOS PALOS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703425 323.33 072-2920-018-0000 HOLLY GALVIN 12504 FARLEN CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427831 320.71 072-4460-072-0000 KELLIE SIECK 12585 BROKENFORK CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 349.89 057-0264-013-0000 GUADALUPE G G DUENAS 10612 ZIBIBBA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703829 317.58 057-0030-022-0000 C D HARRELL LIVING TRUST 10520 CHARDONAY DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703810 367.56 058-0091-003-0000 JOSE GASCA & OFELIA REYES 2308 EL MANTO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704106 337.39 072-2970-209-0000 KAY WILSON 3143 RUSHALL CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706270 306.08 057-0103-001-0000 BRITTANI BIBBS 2534 FURMINT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703620 306.08 067-0670-015-0000 MANUEL & MARLENE JARAMILLO 11879 STONEY OAKS CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428134 306.08 076-0202-004-0000 JOSEPH ARNAZ 2700 EL SEGUNDO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703408 306.08 067-2400-056-0000 JENNA & JONATHAN BERGSTEDT 12833 TOWER BEACH WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426771 306.08 067-2440-089-0000 MANDEEP SINGH 12276 ROCKY FORD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426794 306.08 076-0155-007-0000 CASTULO MA ROBLES 10213 COLOMA RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703605 306.08 072-0173-007-0000 SAMANTHA REDSTONE 2953 HUNT DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705613 306.00 067-0700-076-0000 ESTANISLAO GODINEZ 5005 COPPER SUNSET WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427797 304.89 068-0511-010-0000 JACK W COX 3125 EXPLORER DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272708 331.36 067-0590-056-0000 ELISHEA PACKER 4324 ACCORDION WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428080 330.49 057-0262-007-0000 KUNJIAN LI 10575 PINOT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703824 297.29 076-0270-028-0000 MICHAEL JOHNSON/LATISHA BROOKS PO BOX 1512 RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957411512 276.87 077-0221-027-0000 MCMOORE BRIAN 3121 CHETTENHAM DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705708 290.58 058-0033-008-0000 SAMUEL MEDRANO 2623 ANGIE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704931 289.34 056-0393-005-0000 MICHAEL KEESEE 2121 TIBER RIVER DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702817 289.34 068-0122-007-0000 MIESHA M SANDERS 9923 METEOR DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272911 287.78 072-2990-108-0000 GERALD APODACA & KERI KENDALL 3120 LEA STERLING WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 284.83 068-0072-014-0000 SETH FELDMAN 9952 NEBULA WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272914 284.83 077-0065-004-0000 WILL CUELLAR 3011 SWANSEA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705330 284.83 058-0216-013-0000 SONA MINASYAN 10710 CARLOS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704004 284.83 056-0174-019-0000 JAIME & CLARA MENDOZA 2140 WOODLAWN DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702447 284.83 067-1370-087-0000 AMEEK PRAKASH 4322 SILVER MOSS ST RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 284.83 067-2390-100-0000 DEEPTHI DILIP BELUR 4000 TRENTO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 284.83 077-0221-020-0000 ENRIQUE HEREDIA 7856 OLD AUBURN RD APT 7 CITRUS HEIGHTS CA 95610 284.83 072-3290-027-0000 ELIZABETH M & ERIC D STAHL 10989 MERRICK WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956708030 284.83 067-0540-107-0000 CAROLYN GOLDMAN 11704 VILLAGE POND WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428027 284.83 067-1170-075-0000 JESSICA MATNEY 4040 AURA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428217 284.83 076-0043-007-0000 REBECCA FLORES 10244 AGNES CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702059 284.83 077-0132-006-0000 SUBHI Y TAYEH 10378 WHITE ROCK RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705432 284.83 076-0092-010-0000 RUTH FEDRAU 10357 DANIEL WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702004 284.83 068-0111-011-0000 WILLIAM M BENJAMIN 3400 JUPITER DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272930 284.83

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 077-0233-007-0000 CHARLES M BURTON 3234 NOSLER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705742 284.83 067-0820-019-0000 WOODROW SANDERS III 12245 CANYONLANDS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427706 283.08 057-0103-014-0000 JENNIFER MCMILLAN 2533 AUGIBI WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703615 283.08 072-0320-010-0000 CARL & REBECCA GEORGE 10651 OLSON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705619 278.05 058-0182-021-0000 ELIZABETH & MERVIN SERVIANO 2461 QUEENWOOD DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705108 308.64 072-0192-009-0000 MATTHEW J PRAY 10518 SILVERWOOD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705519 264.78 072-1960-033-0000 GIFT T T-JOJO 10920 PINELLA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706906 290.24 075-0680-044-0000 SENORINA CHACE/ELLIS FORT 2752 TIERRA GRANDE CIR SACRAMENTO CA 958271414 290.24 068-0364-041-0000 GURDEEP BAIN 9937 BURLINE ST SACRAMENTO CA 958273543 257.17 058-0101-014-0000 BIJESH MAHARAJ 2400 SONATA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705236 239.57 067-1280-014-0000 RASHPINDER KAUR 12805 THORNTONHALL DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426632 239.57 056-0042-014-0000 JIM VANECK 2254 LA GRAMA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 239.57 072-1340-068-0000 MELISSA WARDELL 10637 BASIE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956707315 234.49 076-0270-012-0000 THEO JOHNSON PO BOX 2022 FOLSOM CA 957632022 248.58 067-0630-025-0000 BROOKLYN BARNETT TRUST 4386 MALANA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428059 248.58 076-0270-002-0000 THEOPOLIS JOHNSON 10109 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703311 248.58 077-0165-001-0000 FLORES ALEXANDER 10202 SUNOL WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272456 248.58 058-0192-023-0000 CARRIE BARBIER 10625 CAMPANA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703913 278.65 077-0370-088-0000 JOHN BALBUENA 3451 MISTY MORNING CIR SACRAMENTO CA 95827 274.71 067-0480-058-0000 ESTER NERSISYANA 4194 TULIP PARK WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428010 280.32 056-0385-001-0000 TORIN ASHBY-HOPPE/TAYLOR DESIL 1449 KLAMATH RIVER DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702848 234.60 057-0061-002-0000 CANDY & JEMEIERE WILSON 10467 DOLECETTO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703640 263.53 077-0144-003-0000 GREGORIO TORRES 10463 REYMOUTH AVE RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705829 263.35 067-0750-034-0000 CORDIS AND ASHLEY WEBB 12038 QUAIL FALLS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428130 261.49 077-0172-006-0000 YELENA KOLOSEY 10376 EL GRANDE CT APT A RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705370 230.00 067-0580-038-0000 PURNAMA LIVING TRUST 4329 KERKYRA CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428088 257.13 077-0250-022-0000 DANIELLE N & RYAN E BECK 10101 NADA CT SACRAMENTO CA 958272423 253.44 077-0260-023-0000 CAUDILL FAMILY LIVING TRUST 10246 PISTACHIO WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272473 614.54 067-2550-067-0000 KEYONI ROBISON 12700 PATAGONIAN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 289.04 077-0081-002-0000 ANTHONY MARTINEZ 3073 RAMSGATE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705342 252.36 077-0103-006-0000 GERARDO PEREZ 10282 CROYDON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705312 252.36 067-0550-024-0000 SUKHJIT BADWAL & ALLYSHA NATH 12699 EVANSTON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427802 252.36 057-0173-021-0000 SHERRY AHUJA 10609 CHARBONO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704813 252.36 067-0560-118-0000 KRISHNARAJ & VALLI S 4394 NIOBE CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428043 252.36 057-0172-010-0000 DANIEL RIDGE & CHLOE GARDNER 2629 ARAMON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703701 252.36 067-0760-082-0000 HARINDERPAL S PEGANY 4800 CEDAR LANDING WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428114 252.36 072-0152-012-0000 LUIS ENRIQUE GARCIA 10544 GLENVIEW WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705511 252.36 058-0071-001-0000 MARK TWEEDY 10750 SEGOVIA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704018 252.36 058-0083-020-0000 JIM ALLEN 10901 CRISTOBAL WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704122 252.36 067-0590-074-0000 ERIC HAGEN 4311 CADEE CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428085 250.33 057-0272-011-0000 DEJAUNA & STEVEN HAYES 10540 COLOMA RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702325 250.56 068-0433-013-0000 RODAS KIDANE 9813 WOODHOLLOW WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272828 202.61 058-0510-025-0000 ANDREY SOROKOPUD 2434 RASHAWN DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704258 202.61 067-2390-108-0000 CHINH WHITE 11981 ARMANDI WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 214.34 067-0590-058-0000 BRITTANY FOSTER 4316 ACCORDION WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 209.97 067-1370-129-0000 ANGEL BROWNING PO BOX 6513 GOODYEAR AZ 85338 240.03 077-0131-008-0000 ELISA AND JEREMY SIMPSON 2978 JOERGER ST RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705315 207.26 072-2100-006-0000 ANA VILLALPANDO 3237 ABOTO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706925 232.74 068-0135-017-0000 JERRIE J SAID SR 10098 NEBULA WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272975 201.43 076-0241-003-0000 AMBER R/KAO L SAETERN & KAE K 2446 EL LUJO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703158 230.00 072-2940-063-0000 DESI & MARYTZA PENA 3698 ROCKDALE DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427782 194.20 077-0112-011-0000 ERIC AND FELICIA DAVIS 10441 ABINGTON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705805 176.99 077-0270-019-0000 RUBEN & JULIAH BRADFORD 3213 SAGEWOOD CT SACRAMENTO CA 958272426 222.39 067-0440-075-0000 ALEKSAN AKOPYAN 11881 WHITE RAIN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428003 191.08 076-0081-004-0000 WESLEY CALDWELL 1000 STONECREST DR ANTIOCH CA 945318009 191.08 056-0092-013-0000 BRAD LITTLEJOHN 10513 GEORGETOWN DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702250 189.89 058-0153-016-0000 JENN HIGDAY 2361 BYRD DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703957 189.89 072-2460-043-0000 AGUEDO & TERESITA CARRILLO 3525 DEBINA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706972 189.89 057-0203-001-0000 CYNTHIA BLUST 2600 RIESLING WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704821 189.89 058-0480-004-0000 ERNEST WOOLFOLK 10940 ANZA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 189.89 077-0191-015-0000 DON HAY 5250 PACIFIC ST SUITE A ROCKLIN CA 956772756 189.89 072-3300-032-0000 VANESSA PYMOT PO BOX 160231 SACRAMENTO CA 95816 189.89 058-0171-005-0000 JOSE MORENO 10723 CAMPANA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703915 189.89 057-0092-006-0000 JIMMY BALLARD 2524 TORMOLO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703634 189.89 076-0135-003-0000 RICHARD & TERESA HERNANDEZ 10265 COLOMA RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703656 189.89

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 058-0173-023-0000 ISMAEL GUTIERREZ/ARACELI 2230 WHISTLER WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703906 189.89 067-0520-025-0000 DAVID SARGSYAN 11957 MULDOON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428094 189.89 068-0520-039-0000 JASON LAUGHLIN 9682 GREENSBORO CIR SACRAMENTO CA 958272721 189.89 068-0471-019-0000 ANTHONY & MEAGAN HARDING 3236 SATURN DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272350 189.89 072-2370-044-0000 LEEANN CHILDERS 10735 BYINGTON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706940 189.89 067-1210-035-0000 YURIRIA ORTIZ 4291 PRIVAS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428244 189.89 067-0840-114-0000 HARISH PENYALA/PRIYANKA YAMALA 12322 CANYONLANDS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427709 189.89 072-0165-012-0000 ANA MARTINEZ 2933 GRAYSON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705609 189.89 077-0380-036-0000 NADIA LIKHTAR 10262 ELLENWOOD AVE SACRAMENTO CA 958273005 189.89 067-1090-035-0000 ARTHUR STEPANYAN 4300 ORPHEUS CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428259 189.89 067-2470-070-0000 PARDEEP SINGH 12137 ALAMOSA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426784 189.89 072-3910-012-0000 NICOLE MUNIZ 11624 TARCOLES WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426930 189.89 072-2970-011-0000 SATWANJIT KAUR 11019 INTERNATIONAL DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428054 189.89 067-2440-092-0000 SANIE SORIANO 12264 ROCKY FORD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426794 189.89 077-0072-007-0000 YURIY PASECHNIK 3135 PORTSMOUTH DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 189.89 077-0103-005-0000 FRANCES HARRIS 3233 SANBURY CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705701 189.89 077-0152-015-0000 MAURICE JOHNSON 10241 S WHITE ROCK RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705825 189.89 076-0193-001-0000 BOB ROCKWELL 10348 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703529 188.78 072-0151-022-0000 MIKE TAMPUS 11776 S CARSON WAY GOLD RIVER CA 956708108 187.63 072-0151-022-0000 MIKE TAMPUS 11776 S CARSON WAY GOLD RIVER CA 95670 186.81 067-0830-053-0000 TRUMAN LUM 4003 CUYAMACA CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427716 170.48 067-0550-001-0000 ADEEL MIAN/MOMIN N CHOUDHRY 11825 LOISDALE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428029 206.03 067-0660-102-0000 ANNAHI I RUANO & MIKE GARCIA 4016 KALAMATA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 190.85 067-0450-096-0000 ARAMAIS & GOARIK TUMASYAN 11758 LILAC CANYON CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428051 159.71 075-0244-001-0000 JIM VANECK 2254 LA GRAMA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703137 159.71 076-0261-003-0000 FLORENTINA URIE PO BOX 366 RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957410366 159.71 077-0113-015-0000 DEREK N SHUPE 3248 CHETTENHAM DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705833 159.71 057-0010-055-0000 FRED CANIHAN 2368 RUDAT CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703946 159.71 058-0221-009-0000 VIOLET CHILEL & WILFER GUZMAN 10633 VIANI WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703934 172.78 077-0324-015-0000 THERESA DAVIES/KUMBA BHONOPHA 3375 HARTSELLE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272449 164.52 067-0810-024-0000 ESTEBAN ESPERANZA 4072 PRESERVE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427732 193.71 072-2880-077-0000 ZIYODABONU NIJMANJONOVA 3611 EDINGTON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427835 156.58 067-2460-012-0000 TOCHUKWU OZIOKO 3945 MIRECOURT CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 155.11 056-0320-026-0000 REGINALD VELTEN 11230 GOLD EXPRESS DR #310-114 GOLD RIVER CA 956704484 164.27 057-0113-003-0000 ERIC HERNANDEZ/JESSICA GIRON 2513 SARDA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 146.23 067-2560-021-0000 JAMEELAH DOTSON 12672 TOUCAN CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 141.96 068-0126-005-0000 CAROLYN THOMAS 10005 LINCOLN VILLAGE DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272931 164.89 058-0370-003-0000 BRETT NASHLUND 10929 ALANDALE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705122 115.00 056-0123-023-0000 CYNTHIA STAUSS 2111 FORESTLAKE DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702408 127.83 072-3000-045-0000 JANETTE BAJO 10998 DISK DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706282 157.99 067-0870-043-0000 VAZGEN SIRAKANYAN 4162 CAHAKIA PL RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427739 125.21 057-0104-012-0000 ANNE H MATTHEWS 2541 FURMINT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703619 148.99 056-0300-072-0000 CHI-TEH SHEN 10976 MIRA RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702718 124.78 067-1190-045-0000 ANDREW ANTONETTI 4116 AURA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428232 147.64 072-0152-009-0000 DAVID & MARIA SUMPO 10532 GLENVIEW WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705511 115.00 067-0660-077-0000 HARI VENKITESWAREAN 4034 CORATINA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428006 99.82 058-0092-025-0000 WILLIAM GASKILL 2290 CERVANTES DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704123 112.33 067-0440-076-0000 ARYAR AND YATRA RACHOGAN 11885 WHITE RAIN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428003 110.58 058-0134-002-0000 JASON BILLINGTON 2507 QUEENWOOD DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705110 137.68 067-0440-092-0000 MUSTAFA & ZUHAL BAHADURI 3998 IRON GATE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428002 137.36 072-0171-004-0000 SAVINO & DAISY MORENO 2944 WESTON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705505 100.65 057-0052-018-0000 JOHN D PHILLIPS 2536 TRONERO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703610 99.45 072-3260-023-0000 GURDEEP BAINS 10834 BARDEN DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 83.67 077-0141-003-0000 ARMINE ISMAILYAN 3216 LAURELHURST DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 128.43 068-0134-007-0000 GUADALUPE GONZALEZ/ALEJANDRO 10035 NEBULA WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272972 80.87 072-1970-002-0000 ARUN KAIWAR 3372 CORVINA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706903 126.43 057-0104-008-0000 JOSHUA J BAIZ 2557 FURMINT WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703619 368.95 077-0324-021-0000 KATHLEEN BROWN 3339 HARTSELLE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272449 292.61 067-1330-003-0000 OKOYE SAIGH 12696 SCHOLARLY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426914 243.02 077-0191-012-0000 SAMUEL YARMAGYAN 3490 PONZI CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 201.08 068-0135-016-0000 KHONDKER  ALAM 10994 PELARA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 180.78 072-2100-009-0000 OSCAR MARTINEZ 4249 PAISLEYSHIRE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 126.18 067-0450-107-0000 ELIZABETH A RIGGS/TIM R TOPPEN 11775 JUSTINIAN DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428052 126.18 075-0680-074-0000 TRUJILLO FAMILY TRUST 2621 TIERRA GRANDE CIR SACRAMENTO CA 958271412 126.18 067-2460-010-0000 VIKTOR KHRIPUNOV 3937 MIRECOURT CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 126.18

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 072-2920-007-0000 JAYME JONES 3742 EDINGTON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 126.18 067-0760-059-0000 ROBERTO & MARIZA ANDRADE 5021 HEATHER RANCH WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428179 126.18 067-0700-063-0000 LONNIE PATTERSON 12074 COTTERDALE CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427798 126.18 077-0250-039-0000 KT & Z VENTURE LLC/KIA TANG 10136 COUNTRYSIDE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272416 126.18 067-0630-014-0000 KAMO I AVANYAN 4409 ANATOLIA DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428054 126.18 067-0800-095-0000 ARPINE MASOYAN 12233 CONSERVANCY WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427763 126.18 058-0152-005-0000 BRITTANY HOMANYI 2344 BYRD DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703956 126.18 077-0162-010-0000 JOSE GARCIA-SANCHEZ 3352 GOULD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272459 126.18 077-0250-045-0000 ANTHONY MELANCON 10112 COUNTRYSIDE WAY SACRAMENTO CA 95827 126.18 067-1250-069-0000 NANCY HERNANDEZ 12850 DAYLILY COAST LN RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426762 126.18 077-0260-056-0000 RAFAEL VENTURA/ MARIA CASTILLO 10216 PISTACHIO WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272474 126.18 067-0740-027-0000 BALVINDER SINGH AND ANJANA 12075 SAGE WAGON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427770 126.18 068-0451-007-0000 DTP PROPERTIES LLC 3536 GRANBY DR SACRAMENTO CA 958273523 126.18 057-0282-004-0000 TRUST OF LAWRENCE 2419 ARAMON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703855 126.18 075-0400-027-0000 JUDY REYNEN 10630 MATHER BLVD MATHER CA 956554125 125.17 075-0700-007-0000 SAMUEL H UNGERER 2844 TIFFANY WEST WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958271416 108.93 072-2210-064-0000 CHRISTOPHER BUDGE 10729 BELLONE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706927 108.93 058-0152-007-0000 SHANNON PASSAFIUME 2352 BYRD DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703956 102.93 057-0311-016-0000 ROBLES FAMILY TRUST 2410 CARIEL CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956704924 102.26 067-0480-049-0000 CYNTHIA PIERCE 11831 SANDY KNOLL CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428021 94.97 077-0370-077-0000 KAREN RODRIGUEZ 3423 SKYWARD CT SACRAMENTO CA 958273061 94.94 072-2970-163-0000 BRIAN CONRADI 7019 ROCKROSE TER CARLSBAD CA 920113955 94.94 067-0600-030-0000 C/O GK PROPERTY MANAGMENT 11230 GOLD EXPRESS DR 310 GOLD RIVER CA 95670 94.94 057-0073-018-0000 CHRIS WEST 2524 CHASSELLA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703741 94.94 072-2990-301-0000 REGINALD BROWN 10818 ATHERSTONE DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706274 94.94 076-0182-004-0000 ERNESTO PAZ 2688 ELLENBROOK DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703541 94.94 067-0700-080-0000 JOSH FELDMAN 5021 COPPER SUNSET WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 94.94 058-0311-008-0000 NIAMH BOURASSA 10980 HIRSCHFELD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 94.94 056-0203-005-0000 HOPE L MCELROEN 2232 FORESTLAKE DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702459 94.94 068-0435-018-0000 ANDREA AMES 9809 HEARTWOOD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272812 94.94 077-0132-011-0000 TERRI L HOWARD 10365 TRUE CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705334 94.94 068-0480-054-0000 DOUGLAS R VALLEE 9950 BEXLEY DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272335 94.94 077-0173-012-0000 DAVID J THIBEDEAU 117 SIERRA WOODS CIR FOLSOM CA 956302913 94.94 072-1340-025-0000 RAJANI & SRINIVAS PENUMECHCHU 3421 BRUBECK DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956707332 94.94 072-3300-059-0000 SHEILA JOHNSON 3247 FOXTON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956708034 94.94 056-0370-066-0000 ROBERT & MICHELLE LEMBKE 11144 PORTAGE RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702938 94.94 077-0154-013-0000 RAUL M & CESAR M MARTIN 10276 S WHITE ROCK RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705824 94.94 077-0240-038-0000 JUVY P KRONGKIET 10467 EL MERCADO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705969 94.94 077-0154-005-0000 SALVADOR SOLARES 270 DE BORD DR TRACY CA 953767002 94.94 077-0154-005-0000 SALVADOR SOLARES 270 DE BORD DR TRACY CA 953767002 94.94 077-0154-006-0000 SALVADOR SOLARES 270 DE BORD DR TRACY CA 953767002 94.94 077-0154-006-0000 SALVADOR SOLARES 270 DE BORD DR TRACY CA 953767002 94.94 067-0660-017-0000 TL TRUST 4081 ARAGON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428005 94.94 058-0101-001-0000 DENNIS HARE 2344 PINTURO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95670 94.94 067-0720-061-0000 RAINBOW M BROCKENBOROUGH 5226 COPPER SUNSET WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428127 94.94 068-0071-015-0000 FROYLAN G TINAJERO 9957 NEBULA WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272913 94.94 077-0310-024-0000 RAED KINA/MAYYADAH ABBO 3301 GLENMOOR DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272434 94.94 072-2960-010-0000 JARED & CHRISTA MCKEOWN 12565 KIRKLIN CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426710 94.94 077-0154-023-0000 MARIA L ARIAS-FRAIRE 10334 S WHITE ROCK RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705704 94.94 068-0350-033-0000 ARA KIRAKOSYAN/KARAPET 3305 ROMFORD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958272319 94.94 067-1200-048-0000 DESIREE RICHARDSON 4332 BORDERLANDS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957427778 94.94 067-0440-016-0000 SRINIVAS & RAJANI PENUMECHCHU 3991 RILEY ANTON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428001 94.94 056-0280-028-0000 SAMVEL AYVAZYAN 11236 SKAGIT RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702903 94.94 072-1970-029-0000 DIANA R MURADYAN 10852 BIANCO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706900 94.94 056-0340-016-0000 STEPHEN R POST 9827 FAIR OAKS BLVD FAIR OAKS CA 95628 94.94 067-0460-079-0000 RAJWANT KAUR & PAWANJIT SINGH 11849 SLATE FALLS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 94.94 067-1200-046-0000 BEVERLY DELUTCHI 4324 BORDERLANDS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 94.94 056-0426-005-0000 SHIUH-HWA WANG 256 MONCADA WAY SAN FRANCISCO CA 94127 94.94 072-0174-010-0000 TAMARA LARSON 2987 HUNT DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705615 94.94 076-0102-017-0000 KAREN MCGOWEN 2519 LAS CASAS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703419 94.94 072-1340-052-0000 MOHAMMED SHAHZAD 10842 BASIE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956707328 94.94 067-0550-027-0000 CHERISSE ALDRICH 11721 LOISDALE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428028 94.94 057-0171-002-0000 PEDRO CORRAL 2640 ARAMON DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703702 94.94 067-0510-037-0000 ALBERT JOHNSON 11858 RUBILITE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428077 94.94 067-0570-078-0000 JEANIE LUI 3915 CLAREWOOD WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958352017 94.94

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Residential Refuse Delinquencies
as of June 22, 2026

PARCEL NUMBER BILLING NAME BILLING ADDR BILLING CITY BILLING STATE BILLING ZIP TOTAL LEVY 072-2470-033-0000 ASTGHIK GHARIBYAN 3572 ENVERO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706961 94.94 058-0193-002-0000 SHIRLEY MA ORSETTI 10624 CAMPANA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703914 94.94 072-0131-001-0000 ROBERT GRAY 10425 MILLS TOWER DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705414 94.94 075-0152-011-0000 PERRY & SALLY METZGER 10130 LA GLORIA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703113 94.94 068-0480-067-0000 LEAH ZHURKO 9913 BEXLEY DR SACRAMENTO CA 958272333 94.94 076-0101-024-0000 CLARENCE W ERVIN 10253 LOS PALOS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703443 94.94 076-0103-016-0000 JOANN J BRUFLADT 9035 BOISE CT SACRAMENTO CA 95826 94.94 077-0091-007-0000 ISAAK KARAPETYAN 3036 MARGATE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705317 94.94 068-0074-001-0000 MICHAEL E YOUNGBLOOD 10004 NEBULA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95827 94.94 068-0072-002-0000 PEGGY COLEMAN PO BOX 277591 SACRAMENTO CA 958277591 94.94 072-1970-015-0000 MANUEL S MORADA 10857 BIANCO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706900 94.94 057-0041-002-0000 JUAN GOMEZ 10504 COLOMA RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702308 94.94 076-0203-010-0000 ERNEST J BROOKER SR 2744 LOS AMIGOS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703431 94.44 057-0152-009-0000 WILLIAM HOKE 10546 SALTANA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703627 87.65 058-0222-016-0000 CYNTHIA ROHRENBACH 10654 VIANI WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703940 86.76 067-2560-036-0000 BALAKUMAR BALU 12732 TOUCAN CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 83.06 056-0290-026-0000 SHALAINE REDDIC 11204 CEDAR RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702902 81.54 072-3420-016-0000 SAINI KURAN 3660 SPOTO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706435 81.42 067-0600-068-0000 STANLEY M & TRINA S ORDONEZ 13829 SIERRA CT SUTTER CREEK CA 956859659 79.86 072-2600-054-0000 KHONDKER ALAM 10994 PELARA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706911 79.86 067-2550-002-0000 KATELYN ENERO 4442 GREENSHANK WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 79.86 072-2220-024-0000 RAKSHA TIWARI & SAGAR POKHREL 3336 PARASOL CT FOLSOM CA 95630 79.86 058-0202-001-0000 LORRAINE A BOYLE 10621 CAMPANA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703913 79.86 067-0660-083-0000 SAKETH KARIPE 4025 KALAMATA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428004 79.86 056-0410-049-0000 GINGER ENRICO 11137 NILE RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702941 79.86 072-2020-034-0000 KHONDKER ALAM/SADIA SULTANA 10994 PELARA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706911 79.86 067-0730-023-0000 SARAJULLAH SUBHAN 5105 OTTER POND WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428122 79.86 067-2390-049-0000 SRIMANTHA MUDIYANS 4004 VALANCE WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426941 79.86 056-0410-052-0000 SAFFORD CHAMBERLAIN 1995 TRUST 11142 JORDAN RIVER CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702945 79.86 067-2490-030-0000 REHANA A KHAN 5355 DASCO WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958351728 79.86 067-1350-136-0000 JAMILLE DULAN 12061 LE BLANC WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 79.86 058-0470-021-0000 CHAD LESTER THOMPSON 11056 GINGERWOOD WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705255 79.86 076-0146-016-0000 RANDALL SCHERER 2625 EL SEGUNDO DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703405 79.86 067-0660-042-0000 THANH T AVRIL 4124 ARAGON WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428007 79.72 057-0092-002-0000 YATRA RACHOGAN 11885 WHITE RAIN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428003 79.56 076-0270-001-0000 TAMMY YEAGER 10107 MALAGA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703311 79.24 077-0154-023-0000 MARIA L ARIAS-FRAIRE 10334 S WHITE ROCK RD RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705704 74.89 072-2970-212-0000 ELENA FEDORISHIN 3149 RUSHALL CT RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956706270 74.65 067-1190-059-0000 ADEEL MIAN 12129 WISTAR WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428237 67.07 068-0370-058-0000 JACQUELYN L GRASSINGER 3412 GRANBY DR SACRAMENTO CA 958273521 60.58 067-2380-022-0000 CARLA GAYMON-DAVNIS 4229 PRIVAS WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426642 57.40 058-0104-013-0000 SUSANNA KHACHATRYAN 2351 ROSADO WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705231 55.06 056-0204-004-0000 REMI QUEYRANE/SHANNON DOHERTY 2221 FORESTLAKE DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956702461 54.83 067-1160-056-0000 KEVIN SCOTT 12736 KNIGHTSBROOK AVE RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957426723 50.49 057-0173-019-0000 XOCHITL ESPINOZA 2685 BARBERA WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703743 47.47 076-0147-011-0000 CAMILA & RAUL SERRANO-CHAVEZ 2648 DAWES ST RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703534 44.14 068-0370-052-0000 SCOTTY J BAILEY 3664 SCORPIO DR SACRAMENTO CA 958273550 43.42 067-2550-110-0000 SHIRLEY BROWN 12667 PATAGONIAN WAY RANCHO CORDOVA CA 95742 39.93 058-0181-028-0000 SHANNON CRAWFORD 2213 ZINFANDEL DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956705120 39.11 067-1090-069-0000 DEBORAH J GONZALEZ 4205 MINOTAUR CIR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 957428214 36.51 076-0101-018-0000 ALEXANDRA & SHERRI BENSON 10229 LOS PALOS DR RANCHO CORDOVA CA 956703425 35.14 Grand Total 406,338.13$

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 3

ITEM 10.2.

DATE: July 6, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Rachel Trinh, Development Senior Analyst

SUBJECT: ORDINANCES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CORDOVA CANCELING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND WOODSIDE 05N,
LP, RELATIVE TO THE DOUGLAS 98 PROJECT AND BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND SUNRIDGE

VILLA PROPERTY, LLC, RELATIVE TO THE SUNDANCE PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION

Waive the first reading and introduce the Ordinances.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

The Ordinances would come back for a second reading and adoption at the next regular City Council meeting. Approval of these Ordinances would cancel a Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cordova (the “city”) and Woodside 05N, LP for Douglas 98 project and between the city and Sunridge Villas Property, LLC for Sundance project.

BACKGROUND

Douglas 98

The City of Rancho Cordova and Douglas Road 98, LP entered into a Development Agreement relative to the Douglas 98 project, which was recorded on May 5, 2006, in Book 20060505 Page 0951, consisting of 693 single-family residential lots, a park, parkways, and landscape corridors. On August 12, 2013, the Douglas 98 project was transferred to Douglas Road 105, LLC.

On September 3, 2013, the city adopted Ordinance No. 26-2013, approving the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, including extending the term of the Development Agreement to October 3, 2028, new impact fees, park development and dedication obligations among other material items. On March 5, 2018, the city adopted Ordinance No. 02-2018, approving the Second Amendment to the Development Agreement, including certain project approvals among other material items. The Project changed ownership again in 2018 to Woodside 05N, LP, a California limited partnership

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 3

who currently owns the Project and has assumed all interests and obligations of the Development Agreement and any subsequent amendments. On June 18, 2018, the city adopted Ordinance No. 13-2018, approving the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement, including the replacement of exhibit and recital to reference all adopted amendments to the Development Agreement.

The Douglas 98 project is complete, and the City has accepted all public improvements, as required by the conditions of approval, the Development Agreement and its subsequent amendments. The last building permit for the project was issued in June 2022.

Sundance

The City of Rancho Cordova and RHNC Sundance-Sacramento entered into a Development Agreement relative to the Sundance project, which was recorded on July 18, 2006, in Book 2006718 Page 0964, consisting of 114 single-family residential lots and a common space area.

On November 6, 2017, the city adopted Ordinance No. 11-2017, approving the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, including extending the term of the Development Agreement to December 6, 2027, certain project approvals, new impact fees, park development and dedication obligations among other material items. On November 16, 2021, the Sundance project changed ownership to Sunridge Villas Property, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

The Sundance project is complete, and the city has accepted all public improvements, as required by the conditions of approval, the Development Agreement and its subsequent amendments. The last building permit for the project was issued in June 2024.

Pursuant to Government Code section 65868 (“Government Code”), the city, Woodside 05N, LP, and Sunridge Villas Property, LLC now wish to cancel the Development Agreement and subsequent amendments for their respective project. The Government Code requires development agreements to be canceled through mutual consent of the parties, notice and hearing requirements, and an ordinance canceling the development agreement. If adopted, these Ordinances will cancel the Development Agreement and release Woodside 05N, LP and Sunridge Villas Property, LLC of all interests and obligations from the respective Development Agreement and its subsequent amendments.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

Adoption of the Ordinances will have no direct fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Ordinance for Douglas 98

2. Exhibit A to the Ordinance - Douglas 98

3. Ordinance for Sundance

City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 3

4. Exhibit A to the Ordinance - Sundance

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1

Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 3

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

ORDINANCE NO. XX-2026

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

CANCELLING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AND WOODSIDE 05N, LP, RELATIVE TO THE DOUGLAS 98

PROJECT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals.

A. In order to strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted Section 65864, et seq., of the Government Code (the "Development Agreement Statute"), authorizing the city, and any person having a legal or equitable interest in the real property, to enter into a development agreement and establish certain development rights in the property, which is the subject of the development project application. Pursuant to Government Code section 65868, development agreements may be cancelled by mutual consent of the parties.

B. The city and Douglas Road 98, LP, a California limited liability partnership entered into a Development Agreement (“Original Development Agreement”) relative to the Douglas 98 project (“the Project”), consisting of single-family residential, neighborhood parks, pedestrian facilities, bikeways, and parkways, as described in Exhibit A and Exhibit B of the Original Development Agreement recorded on May 5, 2006 in Book 20060505 Page 0951.

C. The Project changed ownership to Douglas Road 105, LLC, a California limited liability company under Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated August 12, 2013.

D. On September 3, 2013, the city adopted Ordinance No. 26-2013, approving the First Amendment to the Original Development Agreement, recorded on October 11, 2013, in Book 20131011 Page 0488, including certain project approvals, the term of the agreement, new impact fees, park development and dedication obligations among other material items.

E. On March 5, 2018, the city adopted Ordinance No. 02-2018, approving the Second Amendment to the Original Development Agreement, recorded on April 18, 2018, in Book 20180418 Page 892, including certain project approvals among other material items.

F. The Project changed ownership again in 2018 to Woodside 05N, LP, a California limited partnership (“Developer”), who currently owns the Project and has assumed all interests and obligations of the Original Development Agreement and any subsequent amendments by the Assignment and Assumption Agreement recorded on April 8, 2018 Book 20180418 Page 0892.

G. On June 18, 2018, the city adopted Ordinance No. 13-2018, approving the Third Amendment to the Original Development Agreement, recorded on August 7, 2018, in Book

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. XX- 2026 Page 2 of 3 20180807 Page 942, including replacement of exhibit and recital to reference all adopted amendments to the Original Development Agreement.

H. The Project is built out and has satisfied all terms and obligations set forth in the Original Development Agreement and subsequent amendments.

I. Pursuant to Government Code section 65868, the city and Developer now wish to adopt an ordinance to cancel the Original Development Agreement and subsequent amendments (“Termination Agreement”).

J. On __________, 2026, the Developer signed a “Termination of Development Agreement” for the cancellation of the Original Agreement.

K. The City Council finds that the adoption of this Termination Agreement is not considered a “project” and is exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guideline 15378.

L. On __________, 2026, the City Council, as the legislative body for purposes of Development Agreement approval, amendment and cancellation, held a properly noticed public hearing pursuant to Government Code section 65867 and considered all comments received in writing and all testimony received at the public hearing.

Section 2: Findings.

Therefore, on the basis of: the foregoing recitals, which are hereby incorporated herein, the City Council finds and determines that:

A. The Termination Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified and contained in the city’s General Plan.

B. The Termination Agreement will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city in that the Project will proceed in accordance with all the programs and policies of the General Plan as detailed in the 2006 entitlements and amendments.

C. The City Council finds that the adoption of this Termination Agreement is not considered a “project” and is exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guideline 15378.

D. The Termination Agreement is consistent with the substantive elements of Government Code sections 65864 through 65869.5, and has been processed consistent with all the procedural requirements thereof.

Section 3: Approval of the Termination of Development Agreement.

The City Council hereby approves the Termination of Development Agreement, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, and authorizes the City Manager to sign the Termination of Development Agreement after the effective date of this Ordinance.

Section 4: Recordation

Within ten (10) days after the Termination of Development Agreement is executed by the City Manager, the City Clerk shall submit the amendment to the County Recorder for recordation.

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. XX- 2026 Page 3 of 3

Section 5: Severability.

If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. This City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance be enforced.

Section 6: Publication and Effective Date.

Within fifteen (15) days after adoption, a summary of this Ordinance shall be published once in the Grapevine Independent or the Sacramento Bee, a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in Sacramento County and circulated in the City of Rancho Cordova, in accordance with Government Code section 36933. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova this ___ day of _____________ 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance

OFFICIAL BUSINESS
Document entitled to free recording
Government Code Section 6103

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Rancho Cordova
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Attn: City Clerk

(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER’S USE)

TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

AND

WOODSIDE 05N, LP, AS LANDOWNER

RELATIVE TO DOUGLAS 98 PROJECT

Reason for recording:

This Termination of Development Agreement is being recorded to reflect the termination of the Development Agreement that was recorded on May 5, 2006, in Book 20060505 Page 0951 and the First Amendment recorded on October 11, 2013 in Book 20130111 Page 0488, the Second Amendment recorded on April 18, 2018 in Book 20180418 Page 892, and the Third Amendment recorded on August 7, 2018 in Book 20180807 Page 942

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance

TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
“DOUGLAS 98”

This Termination of Development Agreement (“Termination Agreement” or “Agreement”) is entered into as of this ___ day of ______________, 2026 by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, a municipal corporation (“City”), and WOODSIDE 05N, LP, a California limited liability partnership (“Landowner”), pursuant to the authority of Government Code section 65864 et. seq., relating to Development Agreements. City and Developer are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties” and singularly as “Party.”

RECITALS

A. City and Douglas Road 98, LP, a California limited liability partnership entered into a Development Agreement relative to the Douglas 98 project (“the Project”) described in Exhibit A and Exhibit B of the Original Development Agreement recorded May 5, 2006 in Book 20060505 Page 0951 (“Orginal Development Agreement”), and a First Amendment recorded on October 11, 2013 in Book 20130111 Page 0488, a Second Amendment recorded on April 18, 2018 in Book 20180418 Page 892, and a Third Amendment recorded on August 7, 2018 in Book 20180807 Page 942 collectively (the “Amendments”) as assigned to the Landowner under Assignment and Assumption Agreement recorded on April 8, 2018, in Book 20180418 Page 0892.

B. The Project is built out and has satisfied the terms and obligations set forth in the Original Development Agreement and the Amendments.

C. Pursuant to Section 11.5 of the Original Development Agreement, the Agreement may be cancelled in whole or in part by the mutual consent of the parties thereof or their successors in interest.

D. The City has acted in accordance with Government Code section 65868 by providing proper notice, hearing and the adoption of an ordinance to cancel the Original Development Agreement and its Amendments.

AGREEMENT

1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Preamble, the Recitals, all defined terms set forth herein, and all exhibits attached hereto, are hereby incorporated into this Termination Agreement as if set forth herein in full.

2. Termination of Original Development Agreement. Landowner, as the successor in interest, and City mutually agree to terminate the Original Development Agreement and the Amendments, in whole, that was recorded on May 5, 2006 in Book 20060505 Page 0951, on October 11, 2013 in Book 20130111 Page 0488, on April 18, 2018 in Book 20180418 Page 892, and on August 7, 2018 in Book 20180807 Page 942 in the office the Sacramento County Clerk Recorder.

3. Notices. All notices and other communications required or permitted under this Termination Agreement, the enabling legislation, or the procedure adopted pursuant to Government Code section 65865, must be in writing and must be delivered in person or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, or by facsimile or electronic mail (provided that

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance

such email shall be promptly followed by delivery of such notice by another method as provided herein).

Notice required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows:

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Community Development Director
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
[email protected]

Notice required to be given to Landowner shall be addressed as follows:

Woodside 05N, LP
c/o Woodside Homes of Northern California
Attn:
1130 Iron Point Road, Suite 200
Folsom, CA 95630

Either Party may change the address stated herein by giving notice in writing to the other Party, and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.

4. City Manager Authorization. The City of Rancho Cordova, a municipal corporation, has authorized this Termination Agreement to be executed in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Ordinance No. 07- 2006 adopted by the Council of the City on the 6th day of March, 2006, and has caused this Agreement to be executed.
“CITY”

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,
a municipal corporation

By: _________________________________
Name: Micah Runner
Its: City Manager
Date: _______________________________

“LANDOWNER”

WOODSIDE 05N, LP,
a California limited liability partnership

By: ______________________
Name:

Its:

Date: _______________________________

ATTEST:

__________________________________
Stacy Leitner, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_________________________________
Adam U. Lindgren
City Attorney

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Ordinance

Date: ____________________________

3859186.1

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 3
Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 3

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

ORDINANCE NO. XX-2026

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

CANCELLING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

RANCHO CORDOVA AND SUNRIDGE VILLA PROPERTY, LLC RELATIVE TO THE

SUNDANCE PROJECT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals.

A. In order to strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted Section 65864, et seq., of the Government Code (the "Development Agreement Statute"), authorizing the city, and any person having a legal or equitable interest in the real property, to enter into a development agreement and establish certain development rights in the property, which is the subject of the development project application. Pursuant to Government Code section 65868, development agreements may be cancelled by mutual consent of the parties.

B. The city and RHNC Sundance-Sacramento, a California general partnership entered into a Development Agreement (“Original Development Agreement”) relative to the Sundance project (“the Project”), consisting of single-family residential, and common space area, as described in Exhibits A-1, A-2 and Exhibit B of the Original Development Agreement recorded on July 18, 2006 in Book 2006718 Page 0964.

C. On November 6, 2017, the city adopted Ordinance No. 11-2017, approving the First Amendment to the Original Development Agreement, recorded on January 12, 2018, in Book 20180112 Page 0719, including certain project approvals, the term of the agreement, new impact fees, park development and dedication obligations among other material items.

D. The Project changed ownership to Sunridge Villas Property, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company under Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated November 16, 2021.

H. The Project is built out and has satisfied all terms and obligations set forth in the Original Development Agreement and subsequent amendment.

I. Pursuant to Government Code section 65868, the city and Developer now wish to adopt an ordinance to cancel the Original Development Agreement and subsequent amendments (“Termination Agreement”).

J. On __________, 2026, the Developer signed a “Termination of Development Agreement” for the cancellation of the Original Agreement.

K. The City Council finds that the adoption of this Termination Agreement is not considered a “project” and is exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guideline 15378.

L. On __________, 2026, the City Council, as the legislative body for purposes of Development Agreement approval, amendment and cancellation, held a properly noticed public

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 3
Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 2 of 3 hearing pursuant to Government Code section 65867 and considered all comments received in writing and all testimony received at the public hearing.

Section 2: Findings.

Therefore, on the basis of: the foregoing recitals, which are hereby incorporated herein, the City Council finds and determines that:

A. The Termination Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified and contained in the city’s General Plan.

B. The Termination Agreement will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city in that the Project will proceed in accordance with all the programs and policies of the General Plan as detailed in the 2017 entitlements.

C. The City Council finds that the adoption of this Termination Agreement is not considered a “project” and is exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guideline 15378.

D. The Termination Agreement is consistent with the substantive elements of Government Code sections 65864 through 65869.5, and has been processed consistent with all the procedural requirements thereof.

Section 3: Approval of the Termination of Development Agreement.

The City Council hereby approves the Termination of Development Agreement, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, and authorizes the City Manager to sign the Termination of Development Agreement after the effective date of this Ordinance.

Section 4: Recordation

Within ten (10) days after the Termination of Development Agreement is executed by the City Manager, the City Clerk shall submit the amendment to the County Recorder for recordation.

Section 5: Severability.

If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. This City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance be enforced.

Section 6: Publication and Effective Date.

Within fifteen (15) days after adoption, a summary of this Ordinance shall be published once in the Grapevine Independent or the Sacramento Bee, a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in Sacramento County and circulated in the City of Rancho Cordova, in accordance with Government Code section 36933. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova this ___ day of _____________ 2026, by the following vote:

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 3
Ordinance No. XX-2026 Page 3 of 3

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Garrett Gatewood, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 4 Exhibit A to the Ordinance

OFFICIAL BUSINESS
Document entitled to free recording
Government Code Section 6103

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Rancho Cordova
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Attn: City Clerk

(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER’S USE)

TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

AND

SUNRIDGE VILLA PROPERTY, LLC, AS LANDOWNER

RELATIVE TO SUNDANCE PROJECT

Reason for recording:

This Termination of Development Agreement is being recorded to reflect the termination of the Development Agreement that was recorded on July 18, 2006, in Book 2006718 Page 0964 and the First Amendment recorded on January 12, 2018, in Book 20180112 Page 0719

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 4 Exhibit A to the Ordinance

TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
“SUNDANCE”

This Termination of Development Agreement (“Termination Agreement” or “Agreement”) is entered into as of this ___ day of ______________, 2026 by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, a municipal corporation (“City”), and SUNDRIDGE VILLAS PROPERTY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Landowner”), pursuant to the authority of Government Code section 65864 et. seq., relating to Development Agreements. City and Developer are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties” and singularly as “Party.”

RECITALS

A. City and RHNC Sundance-Sacramento, a California general partnership entered into a Development Agreement relative to the Sundance project (“the Project”) described in Exhibit A and Exhibit B of the Original Development Agreement recorded on July 18, 2006 in Book 2006718 Page 0964 (“Orginal Development Agreement”), and a First Amendment recorded on January 12, 2018 in Book 20180112 Page 0719 (the “Amendment”) as assigned to Sundridge Villas Property LLC, under Assignment and Assumption Agreement recorded on November 24, 2021 in Book 20211124 Page 0012.

B. The Project is built out and has satisfied the terms and obligations set forth in the Original Development Agreement and the Amendment.

C. Pursuant to Section 11.5 of the Original Development Agreement, the Agreement may be cancelled in whole or in part by the mutual consent of the parties thereof or their successors in interest.

D. The City has acted in accordance with Government Code section 65868 by providing proper notice, hearing and the adoption of an ordinance to cancel the Original Development Agreement and the Amendment.

AGREEMENT

1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Preamble, the Recitals, all defined terms set forth herein, and all exhibits attached hereto, are hereby incorporated into this Termination Agreement as if set forth herein in full.

2. Termination of Original Development Agreement. Landowner, as the successor in interest, and City mutually agree to terminate the Original Development Agreement and the Amendment, in whole, that were recorded on July 18, 2006, in Book 2006718 Page 0964 and on January 12, 2018, in Book 20180112 Page 0719 in the office the Sacramento County Clerk Recorder.

3. Notices. All notices and other communications required or permitted under this Termination Agreement, the enabling legislation, or the procedure adopted pursuant to Government Code section 65865, must be in writing and must be delivered in person or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, or by facsimile or electronic mail (provided that such email shall be promptly followed by delivery of such notice by another method as provided herein).

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 4 Exhibit A to the Ordinance

Notice required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows:

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Community Development Director
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
[email protected]

Notice required to be given to Landowner shall be addressed as follows:

Sunridge Villas Property LLC
c/o Sares Regis Group of Northern California
Attn: Ken Busch
520 S. El Camino Real, Suite 200
San Mateo, CA 94402

Either Party may change the address stated herein by giving notice in writing to the other Party, and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.

4. City Manager Authorization. The City of Rancho Cordova, a municipal corporation, has authorized this Termination Agreement to be executed in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Ordinance No. 07- 2006 adopted by the Council of the City on the 6th day of March 2006, and has caused this Agreement to be executed.
“CITY”

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,
a municipal corporation

By: _________________________________
Name: Micah Runner
Its: City Manager
Date: _______________________________

“LANDOWNER”

SUNRIDGE VILLAS PROPERTY LLC
a Delaware limited liability company

By: ______________________
Name:

Its:

Date: _______________________________

ATTEST:

__________________________________
Stacy Leitner, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_________________________________
Adam U. Lindgren
City Attorney

Date:

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 3

ITEM 11.1.

DATE: July 6, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Amanda Norton, Economic Development Director

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF FORMATION TO MODIFY THE RANCHO

CORDOVA TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of Resolution would result in the modification of the Rancho Cordova Tourism Business Improvement District (RCTBID) and the levy of assessments on certain lodging businesses.

BACKGROUND

The RCTBID is a benefit assessment district proposed to continue a revenue source to help fund marketing and sales promotions and destination development programs for assessed Rancho Cordova lodging businesses. This approach has been used successfully in other destination areas throughout the state to improve tourism and drive additional room nights to assessed businesses.

The Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, Streets and Highways Code §36600 et seq., allows for the Owners’ Association to request that the city modify the Management District Plan (Plan). As the RCTBID Owners’ Association, Rancho Cordova Travel and Tourism Corporation (RCTTC) provided a written request to the City Council to modify the RCTBID Plan. This written request was submitted on February 17, 2026. The proposed modification of the RCTBID Plan will include modifying the boundaries of the RCTBID to establish two benefit zones and increasing the assessment rate within Dova Zone from four and one-half of one percent (4.5%) to six percent (6%). The modified RCTBID will continue to include all lodging businesses with two (2) rooms or more located within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cordova.

To continue the modification process, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to Modify the RCTBID on May 18, 2026, and a public meeting was held on June 15, 2026 to allow for public testimony on the proposed modification.

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 3

Tourism Business Improvement Districts
Tourism Business Improvement Districts (TBIDs) utilize the efficiencies of private sector operation in the market-based promotion of tourism. These special assessment districts allow assessed business owners to organize their efforts to increase tourism. Business owners within the TBID fund the TBID, and those funds are used to provide services that are desired by and benefit the assessed businesses within the TBID.

TBID benefits:
• Funds cannot be diverted for other government programs; • They are customized to fit the needs of each destination; • They allow for a wide range of services; including: destination marketing, tourism promotion, and sales lead generation;
• They are designed, created and governed by those who will pay the assessment; and • They provide a stable funding source for tourism promotion.

In California, TBIDs are primarily formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (94 Law). This law allows for the creation of special benefit assessment districts to raise funds within a specific geographic area. The key difference between TBIDs and other special benefit assessment districts is that funds raised are returned to the private non-profit corporation governing the TBID.

RCTBID Modification Process

May 18, 2026 Adopt Resolution of Intention to Modify
(COMPLETED)
Upon the submission of a written request
from the Owners’ Association of the
RCTBID, the City Council (Council) may
initiate proceedings to modify the RCTBID
by the adoption of a resolution expressing
its intention to modify the RCTBID.

No later than
May 22, 2026

NOTICE (COMPLETED)

The 94 Law requires the City to mail
written notice to the owners of all
businesses proposed to be assessed
within the RCTBID. Mailing the notice
begins a mandatory forty-five (45) day
period in which assessed business
owners may protest RCTBID modification.

June 15, 2026

PUBLIC MEETING (COMPLETED)

Allow public testimony on the modification
of the RCTBID and levy of assessments.

No Council action required.

City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 3

July 6, 2026

FINAL PUBLIC HEARING

If written protests are received from the
owners of businesses in the modified
RCTBID which will pay fifty percent (50%)
or more of the assessments proposed to
be levied, and protests are not withdrawn
so as to reduce the protests to less than
fifty percent (50%), no further proceedings
to levy the proposed assessment against
such businesses shall be taken for a
period of one (1) year from the date of the
finding of a majority protest by the
Council.

If the Council, following the public hearing,
decides to establish the modified RCTBID,
the Council shall adopt a Resolution of
modification.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

None immediately. The city will continue to receive a fee of two percent (2%) of the amount collected to cover its costs of administration. Because the RCTBID programs are intended to increase visitation to the city, there may be an increase in transient occupancy tax and sales tax collections.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - RCTBID Map

3. RCTBID Management District Plan

4. Presentation

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING RESULTS OF MAJORITY PROTEST PROCEEDINGS AND

MODIFYING THE RANCHO CORDOVA TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (RCTBID)

WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova (city) created the Rancho Cordova Tourism Business Improvement District (RCTBID) on December 6, 2010 by Resolution No. 136-2010; and

WHEREAS, on April 19, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 44-2021 adopting the Management District Plan (Plan) and renewing the RCTBID; and

WHEREAS, the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (Streets and Highways Code §36600 et seq.) authorizes cities to modify the Plan at the request of the Owners’ Association; and

WHEREAS, the RCTBID Owners’ Association, Rancho Cordova Travel and Tourism Corporation (RCTTC), has requested the modification of the RCTBID and by extension the Plan; and

WHEREAS, a modified Plan has been prepared, and the proposed modifications of the RCTBID Plan include modification of the boundaries of the RCTBID to establish two benefit zones and modification of the assessment rate as described herein; and

WHEREAS, the assessed lodging businesses within the RCTBID will receive a specific benefit from the activities and improvements set forth in the Plan; and

WHEREAS, on May 18, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. at the David B. Roberts Council Chambers, located at 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention, Resolution No. 69-2026; and

WHEREAS, the public meeting and public hearing to consider the modification of the RCTBID have been properly noticed in accordance with Streets and Highways Code §36623; and

WHEREAS, on June 15, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. at the David B. Roberts Council Chambers located at 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670, the City Council held a public meeting regarding the modification of the RCTBID Plan, and the City Council heard and received objections and protests, if any, to the modification of the RCTBID Plan; and

WHEREAS, on July 6, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. at the David B. Roberts Council Chambers located at 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670, the City Council held a public hearing regarding the modification of the RCTBID Plan, and the City Council heard and received all objections and protests, if any, to the modifications of the RCTBID Plan; and

WHEREAS, the City Clerk has determined that there was no majority protest. A majority

ITEM 11.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 2 of 2

protest is defined as written protests received from owners of businesses in the modified RCTBID which would pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the assessments proposed to be levied. Protests are weighted based on the assessment proposed to be levied on each lodging business,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA as follows:

1. The recitals set forth herein are adopted by the City Council as findings and they are true and correct.

2. The City Council hereby modifies the RCTBID Plan. The modification of the RCTBID Plan will include implementing updates to modernize the Plan, as well as the following modifications:
a. The boundaries of the RCTBID shall be modified to establish two (2) benefit zones, as shown on the map attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
b. The modified annual assessment rate for all lodging businesses with two (2) rooms or more shall be as shown in the table below:

Zone Assessment
Rate
Dova Zone 6.0%
Zone 1 4.5%

3. The Plan dated June 18, 2026 is hereby adopted and approved.

4. The RCTBID Plan modified pursuant to this Resolution will be subject to any amendments to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (California Streets and Highways Code §36600 et. seq.).

5. The City Clerk, or his or her designee, is directed to take all necessary actions to complete the modification of the RCTBID and to levy the assessments.

6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the city.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of July 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Garrett Gatewood, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

11 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 18, 2026
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Photo Credit: City of Rancho Cordova

RANCHO CORDOVA TOURISM BUSINESS

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PLAN
June 16, 2026 Prepared pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, Streets and Highways Code section 36600 et seq.
2021-2031
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

Contents

I. OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 3 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 5 III. RANCHO CORDOVA TRAVEL & TOURISM CORPORATION ACCOMPLISHMENTS ...... 6 IV. BOUNDARY .................................................................................................................. 10 V. BUDGET AND SERVICES .............................................................................................. 12 A. Annual Service Plan ........................................................................................................... 12 B. California Constitutional Compliance ................................................................................... 18 C. Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 19 D. Penalties and Interest ......................................................................................................... 20 E. Time and Manner for Collecting Assessments ....................................................................... 21 VI. GOVERNANCE ............................................................................................................. 21 A. Owners’ Association .......................................................................................................... 21 B. Brown Act and California Public Records Act Compliance ...................................................... 22 C. Annual Report .................................................................................................................. 23 APPENDIX 1 – LAW ................................................................................................................. 24 APPENDIX 2 – ASSESSED LODGING BUSINESSES*................................................................ 40

Prepared
by Civitas

www.civitasadvisors.com

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
3 I. OVERVIEW

Developed by Rancho Cordova Travel & Tourism Corporation (RCTTC) and Rancho Cordova hoteliers, the Rancho Cordova Tourism Business Improvement District (RCTBID) is an assessment district proposed to provide specific benefits to payors by funding marketing, sales promotion efforts, and destination development for assessed businesses. This approach has been used successfully in other destination areas throughout the country to provide the benefit of additional room night sales directly to payors.

This Management District Plan, as modified in 2026, reflects updates to the structure, assessment methodology, and programmatic elements of the RCTBID, including the establishment of benefit zones to reflect differing levels and types of benefit expected to be received by assessed lodging businesses.

Dova Zone is intended to accommodate concentrated visitor-serving, hospitality, entertainment, event, and related destination development anticipated to generate overnight visitation and room -night demand.

Location: The RCTBID includes all Lodging Businesses with two (2) rooms or more located within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cordova, as shown on the map in Section IV. The RCTBID includes two benefit zones; assessments, services, and expenditures shall be administered in a manner consistent with the benefits anticipated to be conferred within each benefit zone.

Services: RCTBID is designed to provide specific benefits directly to payors by increasing awareness and demand for room night sales. Marketing and sales promotions and destination development programs will increase demand for overnight tourism and market payors as tourist, meeting and event destinations, thereby increasing demand for room night sales. For Dova Zone, such destination development programs may include visitor-serving capital improvements, public realm improvements, event and entertainment infrastructure, transportation and mobility improvements, programming, marketing, and related facilities, uses, and activities intended to support overnight visitation and lodging demand.

Budget: The total RCTBID annual assessment budget for the initial year of its ten (10) year operation is anticipated to be approximately $2,464,000. This amount may fluctuate as room sales do, as businesses open and close, and if the assessment rate is increased pursuant to this Plan. At the time of this modification, this budget reflects assessments generated from existing Lodging Businesses and does not include revenues attributable to Dova Zone, for which assessments will commence upon the operation of Lodging Businesses within Dova Zone.

Cost: The annual assessment rate is a percentage of gross room rental revenue, varied by benefit zone. The initial annual assessment rate for each benefit zone is shown in the table below.

Zone Assessment Rate
Dova Zone 6.0%
Zone 1 4.5%

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
4 At the City of Rancho Cordova City Council’s discretion, assessments collected may be used to repay a capital infrastructure bond if the City Council chooses to issue bonds. Until and unless bonds are issued, any funds collected by the RCTBID will be used towards the services outlined in this Plan. The assessment levied pursuant to this Plan will also not be collected on stays pursuant to contracts executed prior to July 1, 2021. Stays pursuant to contracts executed between September 1, 2013 and June 30, 2021 shall instead be subject to assessment at the rate of $1.50 per paid occupied room per night. During the ten (10) year term, the assessment rate may be increased annually by the RCTBID Owners’ Association by a maximum of one percent (1%) of gross room rental revenue per year, as described in Section IV. The total assessment rate may not exceed ten percent (10%) in any zone.

Collection: The City of Rancho Cordova (City) will be responsible for collecting the assessment on a monthly basis (including any delinquencies, penalties and interest) from each assessed Lodging business located in the boundaries of the RCTBID. The City shall take all reasonable efforts to collect the assessments from each Lodging Business.

Duration: RCTBID will have a ten (10) year life, beginning July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2031.

Once per year, beginning on the anniversary of RCTBID renewal, there is a thirty (30) day period in which owners paying fifty percent (50%) or more of the assessment may protest and initiate a City Council hearing on RCTBID termination.

Management: Rancho Cordova Travel and Tourism Corporation (RCTTC) will continue to serve as the RCTBID Owners’ Association. The Owners’ Association is charged with managing funds and implementing programs in accordance with this Plan and must provide annual reports to the City Council. This provision shall be read together with the governance provisions applicable to Dova Zone pursuant to Section VI.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
5 II. BACKGROUND

TBIDs are an evolution of the traditional Business Improvement District. The first TBID was formed in West Hollywood, California in 1989. Since then, over 100 California destinations have followed suit.

In recent years, other states have begun adopting the California model – Montana, South Dakota, Washington, Colorado, Texas and Louisiana have adopted TBID laws. Several other states are in the process of adopting their own legislation. The cities of Wichita, Kansas and Newark, New Jersey used an existing business improvement district law to form a TBID. And, some cities, like Portland, Oregon and Memphis, Tennessee have utilized their home rule powers to create TBIDs without a state law.

California’s TBIDs collectively
raise over $300 million annually
for local destination marketing.

With competitors raising their
budgets, and increasing rivalry
for visitor dollars, it is important
that Rancho Cordova Lodging
Businesses continue to invest in
stable, lodging-specific marketing
programs.

TBIDs utilize the efficiencies of
private sector operation in the
market-based promotion of
tourism districts. TBIDs allow
lodging business owners to
organize their efforts to increase
demand for room night sales.

Lodging business owners within the TBID pay an assessment and those funds are used to provide services that increase demand for room night sales.

In California, most TBIDs are formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994. This law allows for the creation of a benefit assessment district to raise funds within a specific geographic area. The key difference between TBIDs and other benefit assessment districts is that funds raised are returned to the private non-profit corporation governing the district.

There are many benefits to TBIDs:

• Funds must be spent on services and improvements that provide a specific benefit only to those who pay;
• Funds cannot be diverted to general government programs; • They are customized to fit the needs of payors in each destination; • They allow for a wide range of services;
• They are designed, created and governed by those who will pay the assessment; and • They provide a stable, long-term funding source for tourism promotion.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

6 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

III. RANCHO CORDOVA TRAVEL & TOURISM CORPORATION

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Established in 2010, but formally organized in 2011, the Rancho Cordova Tourism Business Improvement District (RCTBID) set out to increase the number of district visitors, improve the brand of the destination and increase market share for the hotels in Rancho Cordova. Through robust marketing, business development, brand positioning and consistent relationship management, the Visit Rancho Cordova brand, managed by Rancho Cordova Travel & Tourism Corporation (RCTTC) has accomplished these goals and continues to serve as an asset to the Rancho Cordova community.

Since the formation of RCTBID in 2011 through year - end 2019, Occupancy rate increased 49.2%, Average Daily Rate (ADR) increased by 44.1%, and RevPAR increased by 77.6%. Over this same timeframe, nationally the Occupancy rate increased 15.1%. At the time of the 2026 modification of this Plan, occupancy has trended close to national averages with a slight decrease to 61.1%, while ADR has continued to climb, resulting in flat RevPAR for hotels. (Source: Statista).

Mission:

To drive sustainable tourism in Rancho Cordova that increases economic impact, supports local hotels and businesses, and enhances the quality of life for residents and visitors alike.

Vision:

To put Rancho Cordova on the map as a must-visit hidden gem destination.

Values:

Ambassadors of Community, Collaboration -Fueled, Inclusive at the Core, Always Trustworthy, Possibility-Minded, Unapologetically Joyful.

Brand Promise:

Stunning landscapes, cultural richness, and quirky experiences make Rancho Cordova one-of-a-kind.

Visitor Promise:

In Rancho Cordova, every traveler belongs and there is something for everyone.

Marketing Impact:
• Website impact of 1.4 million sessions, 1.9 million views, and engagement rate of 32.7% since January 1, 2019; influencing, from July-December 2025, over $1,318,321.25 in visitor spending. • Social media impact of 37,000+ followers across all channels, including a reach of 888,000 on Meta platforms since January 2023 and 1.7 million views on Instagram collaboration posts from 2024-2025.
• Paid commercial CTV advertisement impact surpassing 174,229 total plays since November 2025. • Ongoing direct booking campaigns with Expedia, resulting in over 2,048,466 impressions, 1,845 hotel nights, and $247,514 in bookings from 2024-2025.
• Leisure media and PR impact resulting in a printed distribution of more than 1.5 million and more than a digital distribution of 1.8 million from 2024-2025. • Promotional impact of over 30,000 items distributed to assessed hotels, residents, travelers, and Sacramento International Airport from 2024-2025.
• UGC (User Generated Content) online photo galleries garnered 196,700 views since January 1, 2025.
• Virtual tour impact of 2,794,838 Google views and 876,887 clicks via Threshold 360 since January 1, 2023.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

7 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

Sales & Business Development Impact:
• Since 2022, we have hosted 40 meeting and event planners from 11 states across the U.S. and Mexico for Meeting Planner Familiarization Trips
• Since 2022, we have hosted 5 partner Destination Analysis immersions • Since 2022, we have conducted over 700 tradeshow appointments • In 2025 generated 195 leads consisting of 76,785 room nights and $51,083,905.38 in potential economic impact and support 14,064 jobs
RCTTC staff volunteered on the following boards and committees:
• California Capital Airshow
• Rancho Cordova Area Chamber of Commerce
• California Travel Association
• Meeting Professionals International Sacramento Sierra Nevada Chapter • Associations West ELEVATE Steak Committee
• Associations West Capital Regional Counsel
• Gold Country Visitors Association
• Destinations International
• Cordova Recreation & Parks Foundation
• U.S. Travel
• Visit California CEO Committee
• Associations West Membership Advisory Group
• Associations West ELEVATE Sizzle Committee
• OneWest Disaster Recovery Committee
• OneWest Event Committee
• Leadership Rancho Cordova
• STAR Communities
• RCPD Citizen’s Academy
• Sacramento Metro Fire
Industry Recognition and Organization Awards and Certificates:
• Marc Sapoznik Class X Leadership Rancho Cordova graduate 2015 • Marc Sapoznik awarded CHIA (Certification in Hotel Industry Analytics) 2023 • Dawn Hall inducted into Chamber of Commerce Hall of Fame 2023 • Maggie Thyken Huss Class XVII Leadership Rancho Cordova graduate 2024 • Kristen Achziger Class XVIII Leadership Rancho Cordova graduate 2025 • Dawn Hall Class XVIII Leadership Rancho Cordova honorary graduate 2025 • Aubrey Hall awarded PDM (Professional in Destination Management) Certification 2023 • Kristen Achziger awarded PDM (Professional in Destination Management) Certification 2023 • Maggie Thyken Huss awarded PDM (Professional in Destination Management) Certification 2025 • HSMAI International Marketing Campaign Award – Silver 2020 • Smart Women in Meetings Rising Star Award 2022 – Maggie Thyken Huss • CalTravel Association 30 and Under Emerging Leader Award 2023 – Aubrey Hall • Community Partner Award 2024 – Sacramento Telangana Association • Associations West Emerging Professional Rising Star Industry Professional of the Year 2026 – Maggie Thyken Huss

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

8 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

Event Sponsorships
• Barrel District Events
• CA Capital Film Office
• California Capital Airshow
• Cordova Community Council Events
• Leadership Rancho Cordova
• Hangtown Motocross Classic
• Intercollegiate Rowing Association Championships
• Paddle Splash Water Festival
• Rancho Cordova In Action Day of Service
• Rio Strada Racing
• Sac State Athletics
• California Mermaid Convention
• Sac State Aquatic Center
• Soil Born Farms
• Community Food Hub
• American River Parkway Foundation
• Sacramento State Athletics
• Golden West Track & Field
• The Picklr
• Sacramento Children’s Museum
• Sacramento Pride Festival
• The MACC
• Police Activities League Christmas Toy Drive
Memberships & Partnerships
• Rancho Cordova Chamber
• Cordova Community Council
• California Black Chamber
• Hispanic Chamber
• Sacramento Rainbow Chamber
• Visit Sacramento
• Sacramento LGBT Center
• Sac Metro Chamber
• Visit California
• STR (Smith Travel Research)
• US Travel Association
• Cal Travel Association
• Sports Events & Tourism Association (Sports ETA)
• Gold Country Visitors Association
• CalSAE
• American River Parkway Foundation
• Destinations International
• HelmsBriscoe
• HPN Global
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

9 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

• MPI SSN & NCC Chapters
• Civitas
• One West Tourism Alliance
• California Hotel & Lodging Association
• PCMA
• SITE
• ASAE
• SGMP
• California DMO Alliance
• California Sports Alliance
• Sac State Athletics
• CA Capital Film Office
• Sac State Aquatic Center
• The Picklr
• The MACC
• Visit California Meetings
• Visit California LA28
• American River Parkway Foundation
• Regional collaborations for sports shows with Visit Sacramento, Explore Elk Grove, Visit Stockton and Visit Bakersfield
Tradeshows and Conferences:
• Associations West Seasonal Spectacular
• Associations West ELEVATE Annual Conference
• Northstar Small & Boutique Meetings
• TEAMS Annual Conference + Expo
• All Things Meetings Tradeshow and Reception
• Northstar Destination California
• HPN Annual Partner Conference
• ASAE Annual Meeting
• IPW
• Northstar IPEC
• SITE SoCal Holiday Event
• HelmsBriscoe Annual Business Conference
• CA Cup Golf Invitational
• Destinations International Convention Sales & Services Summit • Connect Spring Marketplace
• MPI Northern California Chapter ACE
• PCMA Convening Leaders
• Smart Meetings National Extraordinary Experience
• Connect Marketplace (main convention)
• Destinations International Annual Convention
• Visit California Outlook Forum
• Cal Travel Sumit
• MPI World Education Congress
• IMEX
• Smart Meetings Smart Woman Summit
• CVENT Connect
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

10 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

IV. BOUNDARY

The RCTBID will include all Lodging Businesses existing and in the future that have two (2) rooms or more, available for public occupancy within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cordova. The RCTBID is divided into two (2) benefit zones based on the benefits conferred on Lodging Businesses within each zone. Lodging Businesses in Dova Zone are assessed at a higher rate due to their location within Dova Zone and the greater benefit they are expected to receive from RCTBID funded services.

Dova Zone is intended to include concentrated visitor -serving and destination -generating development, including future lodging, hospitality, entertainment, event, meeting, sports, mobility, and related improvements, all of which are expected to materially enhance ov ernight visitation and lodging demand. Any future Lodging Businesses located within Dova Zone, whether or not affiliated with any existing Dova Zone development, shall be subject to the Dova Zone assessment structure and governance provisions set forth in this Plan.

“Lodging Business” means: any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, and includes any hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodging house, rooming house, apartment house, dormitory, public or private club, mobile home or house trailer at a fixed location, or other similar structure or portion thereof.

The boundary, as shown in the map below, currently includes seventeen (17) Lodging Businesses. A complete listing of Lodging Businesses within the RCTBID can be found in Appendix 2.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

11 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

12 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

V. BUDGET AND SERVICES

A. Annual Service Plan
Assessment funds will be spent to provide specific benefits conferred or privileges granted directly to assessed Lodging Businesses , that are not provided to those not charged, and which do not exceed the reasonable cost to the City of conferring the benefits or granting the privileges. The privileges and services provided with the RCTBID funds are sales and marketing promotions and d estination development programs available only to assessed Lodging Businesses. Funds attributable to each benefit zone shall be administered in a manner consistent with the specific benefits to be conferred on assessed Lodging Businesses within that benefit zone.

A service plan assessment budget has been developed to deliver services that benefit the assessed Lodging Businesses. A detailed annual assessment budget will be developed and approved by RCTTC.

The table below illustrates the initial annual assessment budget allocations. The total initial assessment budget is $2,464,000. Assessments for Dova Zone are not reflected in the initial assessment budget because there are currently no operating businesses within the Zone.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

13 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

Although actual revenues will fluctuate due to market conditions, the proportional allocations of the budget shall remain the same. However, the City and the RCTTC board shall have the authority to adjust budget allocations between the categories by no more than fifteen percent (15%) of the total budget per year; provided, however, that any exercise of such authority by RCTTC with respect to Dova Zone funds shall be subject to the Dova Zone governance provisions of this Plan. Dova Zone funds shall not be commingled with Zone 1 funds. A description of the proposed improvements and activities for the initial year of operation is below. The same activities are proposed for subsequent years. In the event of a legal challenge against the RCTBID, any and all asses sment funds may be used for the costs of defending the RCTBID.

Each budget category includes all costs related to providing that service. For example, the sales and marketing budget includes the cost of staff time dedicated to overseeing and implementing the sales and marketing program. Staff time dedicated purely to administrative tasks is allocated to the administrative portion of the budget. The costs of an individual staff member may be allocated to multiple budget categories. The staffing levels necessary to provide the services below will be determined by the RCTTC on an as- needed basis.

Sales and Marketing
A sales and marketing program will promote assessed Lodging Businesses as tourist, meeting, and event destinations. The sales and marketing program will have a central theme of promoting Rancho Cordova as a desirable place for overnight visits. The program will have the goal of increasing demand for overnight visitation and room night sales at as sessed Lodging Businesses, and may include the following activities:
• Internet marketing efforts to increase awareness and optimize internet presence to drive demand for overnight visitation and room sales to assessed Lodging Businesses; • Print ads in magazines and newspapers, television ads, and radio ads targeted at potential visitors to drive demand for overnight visitation and room sales to assessed Lodging Businesses;
• Attendance of trade shows to promote assessed Lodging Businesses; • Sales blitzes for assessed Lodging Businesses;
• Familiarization tours of assessed Lodging Businesses; • Preparation and production of collateral promotional materials such as brochures, flyers and maps featuring assessed Lodging Businesses;
• Attendance of professional industry conferences and affiliation events to promote assessed Lodging Businesses;
• Lead generation activities designed to attract tourists and group events to assessed Lodging Businesses;
• Director of Sales and General Manager meetings to plan and coordinate tourism promotion efforts for assessed Lodging Businesses;
• Development and maintenance of a website designed to promote assessed Lodging Businesses;
• Coordination of press pitching, curated media trips, and influencer opportunities to drive visitation to assessed Lodging Businesses;
• Development of social media, video, and photography content to promote assessed Lodging Businesses; and
• Strategic development and maintenance of e-newsletters for leisure, meeting, and advocacy audiences to drive visitation to assessed Lodging Businesses.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

14 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

Destination Development
Destination Development (“DD”) shall be administered separately for Dova Zone and Zone 1 in a manner consistent with the benefit zone structure and governance provisions set forth in this Plan.

DD funded from Zone 1 or other non -Dova Zone revenues will be eighteen percent (18%) of the applicable annual budget, unless otherwise adjusted in accordance with this Plan. As the total number of rooms sold and room prices increase over time, the amount of available funds for projects is anticipated to increase. With respect to DD projects funded from Zone 1 or other non -Dova Zone revenues, RCTTC, working collaboratively with the City Manager, shall develop specific DD funding criteria. The City and RCTTC may provide input regarding such projects, and any public work s project contract shall be awarded in accordance with Public Contract Code and Municipal Code requirements.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, DD projects, improvements, activities, programs, and related expenditures funded in whole or in part from Dova Zone revenues shall be governed in accordance with the Dova Zone governance provisions of this Plan. With respect to Dova Zone funds, the Dova Zone Special Committee shall establish project criteria, priorities, and approvals for Dova Zone improvements, activities, programs, and related expenditures funded from Dova Zone 1 revenues.

RCTTC shall have a role limited to administration, implementation, and compliance with this Plan and applicable law, and shall not have discretion to approve, deny, reallocate, or reprioritize Dova Zone projects, activities, programs, or expenditures except as directed by the Dova Zone Special Committee or as required for compliance with applicable law. These DD projects may include:

• Comprehensive and integrated wayfinding signage system including signage to parking decks and lots;
• Transportation programs connecting hotels with downtown and other attractions, to increase room night sales at assessed Lodging Businesses; • Art and cultural projects, to attract overnight visitors; • Gateway enhancements, to attract overnight visitors;
• Enhancements to environmental experiences which attract overnight visitors, and shall expose visitors to the value of the vital ecosystems;
• Improvements to existing parks and sports facilities utilized by overnight visitors; • Safe and fun entertainment complex for young teens and adults utilized by overnight visitors;
• Live music venue which attracts overnight visitors;
• Infrastructure improvements that enhance Destination competitive position to attract desirable special events year around and attract overnight visitors; • Public gathering and festival spaces;
• Convention, meeting, and conference facilities;
• Youth and amateur sports facilities and complexes;
• Mobility, circulation, and transportation improvements, including innovative transportation systems intended to improve access to visitor-serving destinations; • Structured parking, utilities, security, lighting, wayfinding, public realm, and related visitor- serving infrastructure; and
• Other facilities and improvements designed to support tourism, events, entertainment, and overnight visitation.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

15 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

Dova Zone Use of Funds
Dova Zone funds shall be used for any improvements, activities, and programs permitted under this Plan and applicable law, including, without limitation, capital improvements, destination development, and other visitor -serving uses, in each case designed t o drive overnight visitation to assessed Lodging Businesses. Funds raised within the Dova Zone are authorized for disbursement and/or allocation if approved by the Dova Zone Special Committee. Dova Zone expenditures may fund, but are not limited to, the fo llowing: financing, bonding, or other funding mechanisms associated with the development, construction, or operation of arena or stadium facilities, meeting and conference spaces, youth sports facilities, and ancillary visitation infrastructure situated wi thin the Dova Zone and benefitting assessed Lodging Businesses. Dova Zone funds shall be separately accounted for. Permitted Dova Zone uses may include, without limitation, visitor -serving capital improvements, destination development improvements, and related infrastructure designed to drive overnight visitation to assessed Lodging Businesses within Dova Zone, including event venues, public plazas and festival areas, convention and meeting facilities, youth and amateur sports facilities, transportation and mobility improvements, parking, utilities, lighting, security, signage, wayfinding, public realm improvements, programming, marketing, operations, and related visitor -serving facilities, improvements, and activities. Dova Zone funds may be used for constr uction, programming, marketing, operations, financing, and other permitted uses within Dova Zone, including associated debt repayment. An amount equal to five percent (5%) of the revenue derived from the Dova Zone assessment in any year shall be allocated to RCTTC to pay for renewal and benefits received from the RCTTC programming including, but not limited to, sales activities related to the proposed arena.

Administration and Operations
The administration and operations portion of the budget shall be utilized for administrative staffing costs, office costs, advocacy, and other general administrative costs such as insurance, legal, and accounting fees. Shared staffing, contracting, administrative services, programs, and other resources may be used for Dova Zone, Zone 1, or both benefit zones, provided that all costs are separately accounted for and charged or allocated on a reasonable basis consistent with the benefits conferred on each be nefit zone, including direct charges for costs attributable solely to Dova Zone and incremental shared costs reasonably allocable to Dova Zone based on the direct benefits conferred on Dova Zone.

City Administration Fee
The City of Rancho Cordova shall be paid a fee equal to two percent (2%) of the amount of assessment collected, to cover its costs of collection and administration.

Contingency/Reserve
The budget includes a contingency line item to account for uncollected assessments, if any. If there are contingency funds collected, they may be held in a reserve fund or utilized for other program, administration or renewal costs at the discretion of the RCTTC Board. Policies relating to contributions to the reserve fund, the target amount of the reserve fund, and expenditure of monies from the reserve fund shall be set by the RCTTC Board. Contingency/reserve funds may be spent on District programs or adm inistrative and renewal costs in such proportions as determined by the RCTTC Board. The reserve fund from both zones shall be used for the costs of renewing the RCTBID. Any contingency or reserve funds attributable to Dova Zone shall be separately accounted for.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

16 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

Annual Budget
The total ten (10) year improvement and service plan budget is projected at approximately $2,464,000 annually, and for a total amount of $64,760,489 through 2031 if the maximum assessment rate increases are adopted. This budget is expected to fluctuate as room sales change and if the assessment rate is increased. The initial annual assessment rate is a percentage of gross room rental revenue, varied by benefit zone.

The initial annual assessment rate for Dova Zone is six percent (6%) of gross room rental revenue and for Zone 1 is four and one half of one percent (4.5%) of gross room rental revenue. At the time of the 2026 modification of this Plan, the projected budget does not reflect any adjustment attributable to Dova Zone, as there are currently no operational Lodging Businesses subject to the Dova Zone 6% assessment. The absence of currently operating Dova Zone Lodging Businesses shall not limit the future administration, segregation, budgeting, governance, or use of Dova Zone funds once assessments are generated within Dova Zone. Separate Dova Zone budget reporting shall commence upon the first collection of Dova Zone assessments.

The Owners’ Association may increase the assessment rate by a maximum of one percent (1%) per year to a maximum rate of ten percent (10%) for any zone. If the maximum annual assessment increases are adopted by the Owners’ Association upon approval from City Council, the annual budget will increase as illustrated in the table below. The assessment rate might not increase starting in 2022, the increases may be implemented in later years at the discretion of the Owners’ Association. The table below demonstrates the maximum with the assumption that the rates will be increased in annually from 2022 through 2027 as it is a required disclosure, it is not the anticipated course of action. Alternate courses of action may be taken in regards to implem enting the ass essment rate increase other than what is demonstrated in the chart below, within the parameters of this Management District Plan. For example, increases may be implemented in years 2028-2031, with the stipulation that each annual increase is no more than one percent (1%) and that the total assessment rate may not exceed ten percent (10%) for any zone.

Tables A and B below reflect the historical budget from 2021 through 2025. Beginning in 2026 as a result of the modification of this Plan, the budget structure has been updated to consolidate Destination Recovery and Crisis Response funding into the Sales and Marketing category, and this revised structure is reflected in Tables C and D on the following pages. Additionally, a three percent (3%) annual increase in the total budget is shown, to account for estimated increased room night sales as a result of RC TBID efforts. This three percent (3%) annual increase is a conservative estimate based on the effects of similarly sized TBID budgets.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

17 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

Table A
Estimated Annual Budget If Maximum Assessment Rates Are Adopted 2021-2026

Year Sales &
Marketing Administration Destination
Development
Destination
Recovery
Contingency/
Reserve City Fee Total
2021-22 $1,158,080 $492,800 $443,520 $197,120 $123,200 $49,280 $2,464,000 2022-23 $1,457,868 $620,369 $558,332 $248,148 $155,092 $62,037 $3,101,846 2023-24 $1,774,595 $755,147 $679,632 $302,059 $188,787 $75,515 $3,775,734 2024-25 $2,109,136 $897,505 $807,754 $359,002 $224,376 $89,750 $4,487,524 2025-26 $2,461,993 $1,047,657 $942,891 $419,063 $261,914 $104,766 $5,238,283 Total $8,961,672 $3,813,478 $3,432,129 $1,525,392 $953,369 $381,348 $19,067,387 The table below demonstrates the annual improvement and service plan budget with the assumption that the rates will not be increased during years 2021 -2026 of the district’s ten (10) year term.

Additionally, a three percent (3%) annual increase in the total budget is shown to account for estimated increased room night sales as a result of RCTBID efforts.

Table B
Estimated Annual Budget If Maximum Assessment Rates Are Not Adopted 2021-2026

Year Sales &
Marketing Administration Destination
Development
Destination
Recovery
Contingency
/Reserve
City
Fee Total
2021-22 $1,158,080 $492,800 $443,520 $197,120 $123,200 $49,280 $2,464,000 2022-23 $1,192,822 $507,584 $456,826 $203,034 $126,896 $50,758 $2,537,920 2023-24 $1,228,607 $522,812 $470,530 $209,125 $130,703 $52,281 $2,614,058 2024-25 $1,265,465 $538,496 $484,646 $215,398 $134,624 $53,850 $2,692,479 2025-26 $1,303,429 $554,651 $499,186 $221,860 $138,663 $55,465 $2,773,254 Total $6,148,403 $2,616,343 $2,354,708 $1,046,537 $654,086 $261,634 $13,081,711

The following tables reflect the consolidation of the Destination Recovery and Crisis Response category as a result of the 2026 modification of this Plan.

Table C
Estimated Annual Budget If Maximum Assessment Rates Are Adopted 2026-2031

Year Sales &
Marketing Administration Destination
Development
Contingency/
Reserve City Fee Total
2026-27 $3,316,760 $1,206,095 $1,085,485 $301,524 $120,609 $6,030,473 2027-28 $5,214,242 $1,896,088 $1,706,479 $474,022 $189,609 $9,480,441 2028-29 $5,370,669 $1,952,971 $1,757,674 $488,243 $195,297 $9,764,854 2029-30 $5,531,790 $2,011,560 $1,810,404 $502,890 $201,156 $10,057,800 2030-31 $5,697,744 $2,071,907 $1,864,716 $517,977 $207,191 $10,359,534 Total $25,131,205 $12,952,098 $11,656,888 $3,238,024 $1,295,210 $45,693,102 The table below demonstrates the annual improvement and service plan budget with the assumption that the rates will not be increased during years 2026 -2031 of the district’s ten (10) year term.

Additionally, a three percent (3%) annual increase in the total budget is shown to account for estimated increased room night sales as a result of RCTBID efforts.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

18 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

Table D
Estimated Annual Budget If Maximum Assessment Rates Are Not Adopted 2026-2031

Year Sales &
Marketing Administration Destination
Development
Contingency/
Reserve City Fee Total
2026-27 $1,571,048 $571,290 $514,161 $142,823 $57,129 $2,856,451 2027-28 $1,618,180 $588,429 $529,586 $147,107 $58,843 $2,942,145 2028-29 $1,666,725 $606,082 $545,474 $151,520 $60,608 $3,030,409 2029-30 $1,716,727 $624,264 $561,838 $156,066 $62,426 $3,121,321 2030-31 $1,768,229 $642,992 $578,693 $160,748 $64,299 $3,214,961 Total $8,340,909 $5,649,400 $5,084,460 $1,412,350 $564,940 $15,165,287

B. California Constitutional Compliance
The RCTBID assessment is not a property -based assessment subject to the requirements of Proposition 218. Courts have found Proposition 218 limited the term ‘assessments’ to levies on real property.1 Rather, the RCTBID assessment is a business -based assessment, and is subject to Proposition 26. Pursuant to Proposition 26 all levies are a tax unless they fit one of seven exceptions.

Two of these exceptions apply to the RCTBID, a “specific benefit” and a “specific government service.” Both require that the costs of benefits or services do not exceed the reasonable costs to the City of conferring the benefits or providing the services . The assessment imposed by this Plan is a business-based assessment used to provide specific benefits directly to assessed Lodging Businesses.

1. Specific Benefit
Proposition 26 requires that assessment funds be expended on, “a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conf erring the benefit or granting the privilege.”2 The services in this Plan are designed to provide targeted benefits directly to assessed Lodging Businesses, and are intended only to provide benefits and services directly to those Lodging Businesses paying the assessment. These services are tailored not to serve the general public, businesses in general, or parcels of land, but rather to ser ve the specific businesses within the RCTBID. The activities described in this Plan are specifically targeted to increase demand for room night sales for assessed Lodging Businesses within the boundaries of the RCTBID, and are narrowly tailored. RCTBID funds will be used to provide specific benefits directly to the assessees that increase room night demand. Assessment funds shall not be used to feature non-assessed Lodging Businesses in RCTBID programs, or to directly generate sales for non - assessed businesses. The activi ties paid for from assessment revenues are business services constituting and providing specific benefits to the assessed Lodging Businesses.

The assessment imposed by this RCTBID is used to provide specific benefits directly to the payors that are not provided to those not charged. Those specific benefits include increased demand for room night sales for assessed Lodging Businesses. Those specific benefits, including increased demand for room night sales for assessed Lodging Businesses, will be provided only to Lodging Businesses paying the district assessment, with marketing and sales programs promoting Lodging Businesses paying the RCTBID ass essment. The marketing and sales programs will be designed to

1 Jarvis v. the City of San Diego 72 Cal App. 4th 230
2 Cal. Const. art XIII C § 1(e)(1)
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

19 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

increase room night sales at each assessed Lodging Business. Because they are necessary to provide the marketing and sales promotions and destination development programs that provide specific benefits to assessed Lodging Businesses, the administration and contingency services are also necessary to provide those specific benefits, including increased demand for room night sales, to assessed Lodging Businesses

Although the RCTBID, in providing specific benefits to payors, may produce incidental benefits to non-paying businesses, the incidental benefit does not preclude the services from being considered a specific benefit. The legislature has found that, “A specific benefit is not excluded from classification as a ‘specific benefit’ merely because an indirect benefit to a nonpayor occurs incidentally and without cost to the payor as a consequence of providing the specific benefit to the payor.”3

2. Specific Government Service
The assessment may also be utilized to provide, “a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the serv ice or product.” 4 The legislature has
recognized that marketing and promotions services like those to be provided by the RCTBID are government services within the meaning of Proposition 26 .5 Further, the legislature has determined
that “a specific government service is not excluded from classification as a ‘specific government service’ merely because an indirect benefit to a nonpayor occurs incidentally and without cost to the payor as a consequence of providing the specific government service to the payor.”6

3. Reasonable Cost
RCTBID services will be implemented carefully to ensure they do not exceed the reasonable cost of such services. The full amount assessed will be used to provide the services described herein. Funds will be managed by the RCTTC, and reports submitted on an annual basis to the City. Only assessed Lodging Businesses will be featured in marketing materials, receive sales leads generated from RCTBID-funded activities, be featured in advertising campaigns, and benefit from other RCTBID- funded services. Non- assessed Lodging Businesses will not receive these, nor any other, RCTBID- funded services and benefits.

The RCTBID-funded programs are all targeted directly at and feature only assessed businesses. It is, however, possible that there will be a spillover benefit to non -assessed businesses. If non-assessed Lodging Businesses receive incremental room nights, that portion of the promotion or program generating those room nights shall be paid with non- RCTBID funds. RCTBID funds shall only be spent to benefit the assessed businesses, and shall not be spent on that portion of any program which directly generates incidental room nights for non-assessed businesses.

C. Assessment
The annual assessment rate is a percentage of gross room rental revenue, varied by benefit zone. The initial annual assessment rate for each zone is shown in the table below.

Zone Assessment Rate
Dova Zone 6.0%
Zone 1 4.5%

3 Government Code § 53758(a)
4 Cal. Const. art XIII C § 1(e)(2)
5 Government Code § 53758(b)
6 Government Code § 53758(b)
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

20 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

At the City Council’s discretion, assessments collected may be used to repay a capital infrastructure bond if Council chooses to issue bonds. Until and unless bonds are issued, any funds collected by the RCTBID will be used towards the services outlined in this Plan. Based on the benefit received, assessments will not be collected on: charges incurred by a person in the performance of official duties as an officer or employee of a local, state or federal government entity, or by government-sponsored corporate charge card. The assessment levied pursuant to this Plan will also not be collected on stays pursuant to contracts executed prior to July 1, 2021. Stays pursuant to contracts executed between September 1, 2013 and June 30, 2021 shall instead be subject to assessment at the rate of $1.50 per paid occupied room per night. During the ten (10) year term, the assessment rate may be increased annually by the Owners’ Association by a maximum of one percent (1%) of gross room rental. The total assessment rate may not exceed ten percent (10%) for any zone. Assessments collected from Lodging Businesses within Dova Zone shall constitute Dova Zone funds and shall be separately accounted for in accordance with this Plan. This requirement shall apply to all Lodging Businesses located within Dova Zone, whether or not affiliated with any existing Dova Zone development.

The term “gross room rental revenue” as used herein means: the consideration charged, whether or not received, for the occupancy of space in a Lodging Business valued in money, whether to be received in money, goods, labor or otherwise, including all receipts, cash, credits and property and services of any kind or nature, without a ny deduction therefrom whatsoever. Gross room rental revenue shall not include any federal, state or local taxes collected, including but not limited to transient occupancy taxes.

The assessment is levied upon and a direct obligation of the assessed Lodging Business. However, the assessed Lodging Business may, at its discretion, pass the assessment on to transients. The amount of assessment, if passed on to each transient, shall be disclosed in advance and separately stated from the amount of rent charged and any other applicable taxes, and each transient shall receive a receipt for payment from the business. If the RCTBID assessment is identified separately it shall be disclosed as the “RCTBID Assessment.” As an alternative, the disclosure may include the amount of the RCTBID assessment and the amount of the assessment imposed pursuant to the California Tourism Marketing Act, Government Code §13995 et seq. and shall be disclosed as the “Tourism Assessment.” The assessment is imposed solely upon, and is the sole obligation of the assessed Lodging Business even if it is passed on to transients. The assessment shall not be considered revenue for any purpose, including calculation of transient occupancy taxes.

Bonds may be issued.

D. Penalties and Interest
The RCTBID shall reimburse the City of Rancho Cordova for any costs associated with collecting unpaid assessments. If sums in excess of the delinquent RCTBID assessment are sought to be recovered in the same collection action by the City, the RCTBID shall bear its pro rata share of such collection costs. Assessed Lodging Businesses which are delinquent in paying the assessment shall be responsible for paying:

1. Original Delinquency. When an assessment becomes delinquent, any owner who fails to remit any assessment imposed by this Plan within the time required shall pay a penalty of 10 percent (10%) of the amount of the assessment in addition to the amount of the assessment.

2. Continued Delinquency. Any owner who fails to remit any delinquent remittance on or before a period of thirty (30) days following the date on which the remittance first became delinquent shall pay a second delinquency penalty of ten percent (10%) of the ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

21 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

amount of the assessment in addition to the amount of the assessment and the ten percent (10%) penalty first imposed.

3. Fraud. If the City determines that the nonpayment of any remittance due under this chapter is due to fraud, a penalty of twenty -five percent (25%) of the amount of the assessment shall be added thereto in addition to the penalties stated in subsections (1) and (2) of this section.

4. Interest. In addition to the penalties imposed, any owner who fails to remit any assessment imposed by this Plan shall pay interest at the rate of one and one -half percent (1.50%) per month or fraction thereof, compounded, on the amount of the assessment, exclusive of penalties, from the date on which the remittance first became delinquent until paid.

5. Penalties Merged with Assessment. Every penalty imposed and such interest as accrues under the provisions of this section shall become a part of the assessment herein required to be paid.

E. Time and Manner for Collecting Assessments
The RCTBID assessment will be implemented beginning July 1, 2021 and will continue for ten (10) years through June 30, 2031. The City will be responsible for collecting the assessment on a monthly basis (including any delinquencies, penalties and interest) from each Lodging Business. The City shall take all reasonable efforts to collect the assessments from each Lodging Business. The City shall forward the assessments collected to the Owners’ Association. The City’s monthly remittance and reporting shall separately identify collections, penalties, interest, delinquencies, and other amounts attributable to each benefit zone, including Dova Zone. Funds attributable to Dova Zone shall be deposited into the separate Dova Zone account or sub fund maintained pursuant to this Plan.

Concurrent with the remittal of assessment funds to the Owners Association, the City shall also provide monthly reports stating details surrounding businesses that are default on expected payments, as well as the term of their delinquency and any other relevant information for the Owners Association to reasonably determine which assessed L odging Businesses are in compliance with the RCTBID assessment.

VI. GOVERNANCE

A. Owners’ Association
The City Council, through adoption of this Management District Plan, has the right, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §36651, to identify the body that shall implement the proposed program, which shall be the Owners’ Association of the RCTBID as defined in Streets and Highways Code §36612. The City Council has determined that Rancho Cordova Travel and Tourism Corporation (RCTTC) will serve as the Owners’ Association for the RCTBID.

1. Dova Zone Special Committee . Notwithstanding RCTTC’s role as the Owners’ Association, and unless and until the Dova Zone Lodging Businesses elect an alternative governance structure pursuant to the Future Governance Flexibility provisions below, all Dova Zone funds shall be administered pursuant to this subsection. The Dova Zone Special Committee shall have primary authority over Dova Zone fund governance as provided herein. The D ova Zone Special Committee is required to pay its proportionate fair share of any litigation costs regard ing the district and any city collection costs for collecting and enforcing the assessment, identified as no more than 2% in the budget. A Dova Zone Special Committee shall be established consisting of not fewer than three (3) members, all of whom shall be appointed by the assessed Lodging Business within. If the Dova Zone Special Committee consists of three (3) members, at least one (1) member shall also be a current member of the RCTTC Board. If the Dova Zone Special ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

22 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

Committee consists of five (5) members, at least two (2) members shall also be current members of the RCTTC Board. In all cases, appointment authority shall remain solely with the Dova Zone assessed Lodging Businesses. Any such member or members who are also current members of the RCTTC Board shall nevertheless serve on the Dova Zone Special Committee solely by appointment of the Dova Zone assessed Lodging Businesses. The Dova Zone Special Committee may be established and convened earlier with the consent of the City and the Owners’ Association and shall be established and convened no later than upon when construction breaks ground of a Lodging Business within Dova Zone. Subject to the general provisions in this plan requiring all district funds be available for legal defense of the district, and renewal , the Dova Zone Special Committee shall have primary authority over the budgeting, prioritization, approval, allocation, commitment, and expenditure of Dova Zone funds, including approval of Dova Zone projects, activities, programs, project criteria, annual budgets, reallocations within Dova Zone, reserves, and the use of Dova Zone funds to support financing or debt for permitted Dova Zone uses.

RCTTC shall administer and implement the determinations of the Dova Zone Special Committee and shall not reallocate, encumbe r, expend, or otherwise commit Dova Zone funds except as directed by the Dova Zone Special Committee, subject only to compliance with applicable law, public contracting requirements, financing requirements, bond covenants, and related ministerial or compliance obligations. No action of the RCTTC Board shall be required to approve, r atify, or validate any determination of the Dova Zone Special Committee with respect to Dova Zone funds. No action of the Dova Zone Special Committee is intended to and does not supersede the City’s legislative and land use authority under state law and its municipal code. This includes, but is not limited to, the requirement for Dova Zone projects to receive all required and applicable City approval and entitlements.

2. RCTTC Board . RCTTC shall include at least one member of its Board of Directors who is appointed by the owners of Lodging Businesses located within Dova Zone, effective upon no later than upon when construction breaks ground of a Lodging Business within Dova Zone. Any such member or members who are also current members of the RCTTC Board shall nevertheless serve on the Dova Zone Special Committee by appointment of the Dova Zone Owners.

3. Future Governance Flexibility. In light of the anticipated phased development of lodging within Dova Zone, including the possibility that Dova Zone Lodging Businesses may not commence operations immediately, the Dova Zone Special Committee shall serve as the governance structure for Dova Zone. Upon the commencement of operations of any Lodging Business within Dova Zone, the appointment structure of the Dova Zone Special Committee may be revised by amendment to this Plan; provided, however, that Dova Zone funds shall remain subject to Dova Zone governance.

B. Brown Act and California Public Records Act Compliance An Owners’ Association is a private entity and may not be considered a public entity for any purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials for any purpose. The Owners’ Association is, however, subject to government regulations relating to transparency, namely the Ralph M. Brown Act and the California Public Records Act. These regulations are designed to promote public accountability. The Owners’ Association acts as a legislative body under the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code §54950 et seq.). Thus, meetings of the RCTTC board and certain committees must be held in compliance with the public notice and other requirements of the Brown Act. The Owners’ Association is also subject to the record keeping and disclosure require ments of the California Public Records Act. Accordingly, the Owners’ Association shall publicly report any action taken and the vote or abstention on that action of each member present for the action.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

23 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

To the extent applicable, the Dova Zone Special Committee shall be treated as a committee of the Owners’ Association for purposes of transparency, recordkeeping, and public meeting requirements relating to matters within the subject matter of the district.

C. Annual Report
The RCTTC shall present an annual report at the end of each fiscal year of operation to the City Council and shall file the annual report with the City of Rancho Cordova City Clerk, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §36650 (see Appendix 1). The annual report shall include:
• Any proposed changes in the boundaries of the improvement district or in any benefit zones or classification of businesses within the district.
• The improvements and activities to be provided for that fiscal year. • An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements and the activities for that fiscal year. • The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each business owner to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her business for that fiscal year.
• The estimated amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year.
• The estimated amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied pursuant to this part.
• Separate reporting for Dova Zone revenues, expenditures, reserves, carryovers, and commitments.
• A description of Dova Zone projects, activities, and financing approved or proposed for the applicable fiscal year.
• Any proposed changes to the governance, budgeting, or administration of Dova Zone, including any election by the Dova Zone assessed Lodging Businesses to pursue a separate Dova Zone owners’ association or successor governance structure.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

24 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
APPENDIX 1 – LAW

CURRENT THROUGH CH. 790 OF THE LEGISLATION FROM THE 2025-2026 REGULAR SESSION, EFFECTIVE AS OF OCTOBER 13, 2025

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
DIVISION 18. PARKING
PART 7. PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LAW
OF 1994

CHAPTER 1. General Provisions

ARTICLE 1. Declarations
36600. Citation of part

This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994.”

36601. Legislative findings and declarations; Legislative guidance

The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) Businesses located and operating within business districts in some of this state’s communities are economically disadvantaged, are underutilized, and are unable to attract customers due to inadequate facilities, services, and activities in the business districts.
(b) It is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of business districts in order to create jobs, attract new businesses, and prevent the erosion of the business districts.
(c) It is of particular local benefit to allow business districts to fund business related improvements, maintenance, and activities through the levy of assessments upon the businesses or real property that receive benefits from those improvements. (d) Assessments levied for the purpose of conferring special benefit upon the real property or a specific benefit upon the businesses in a business district are not taxes for the general benefit of a city, even if property, businesses, or persons not assessed receive incidental or collateral effects that benefit them. (e) Property and business improvement districts formed throughout this state have conferred special benefits upon properties and businesses within their districts and have made those properties and businesses more useful by providing the following benefits:
(1) Crime reduction. A study by the Rand Corporation has confirmed a 12-percent reduction in the incidence of robbery and an 8-percent reduction in the total incidence of violent crimes within the 30 districts studied.
(2) Job creation.
(3) Business attraction.
(4) Business retention.
(5) Economic growth.
(6) New investments.
(f) With the dissolution of redevelopment agencies throughout the state, property and ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

25 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
business improvement districts have become even more important tools with which communities can combat blight, promote economic opportunities, and create a clean and safe environment.
(g) Since the enactment of this act, the people of California have adopted Proposition 218, which added Article XIII D to the Constitution in order to place certain requirements and restrictions on the formation of, and activities, expenditures, and assessments by property-based districts. Article XIII D of the Constitution provides that property-based districts may only levy assessments for special benefits. (h) The act amending this section is intended to provide the Legislature’s guidance with regard to this act, its interaction with the provisions of Article XIII D of the Constitution, and the determination of special benefits in property-based districts. (1) The lack of legislative guidance has resulted in uncertainty and inconsistent application of this act, which discourages the use of assessments to fund needed improvements, maintenance, and activities in property-based districts, contributing to blight and other underutilization of property.
(2) Activities undertaken for the purpose of conferring special benefits upon property to be assessed inherently produce incidental or collateral effects that benefit property or persons not assessed. Therefore, for special benefits to exist as a separate and distinct category from general benefits, the incidental or collateral effects of those special benefits are inherently part of those special benefits. The mere fact that special benefits produce incidental or collateral effects that benefit property or persons not assessed does not convert any portion of those special benefits or their incidental or collateral effects into general benefits.
(3) It is of the utmost importance that property-based districts created under this act have clarity regarding restrictions on assessments they may levy and the proper determination of special benefits. Legislative clarity with regard to this act will provide districts with clear instructions and courts with legislative intent regarding restrictions on property-based assessments, and the manner in which special benefits should be determined.

36602. Purpose of part

The purpose of this part is to supplement previously enacted provisions of law that authorize cities to levy assessments within property and business improvement districts, to ensure that those assessments conform to all constitutional requirements and are determined and assessed in accordance with the guidance set forth in this act. This part does not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or providing for the furnishing of improvements or activities or the raising of revenue for these purposes.

36603. Preemption of authority or charter city to adopt ordinances levying assessments

Nothing in this part is intended to preempt the authority of a charter city to adopt ordinances providing for a different method of levying assessments for similar or additional purposes from those set forth in this part. A property and business improvement district created pursuant to this part is expressly exempt from the provisions of the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

26 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
of 1931 (Division 4 (commencing with Section 2800)).

36603.5. Part prevails over conflicting provisions

Any provision of this part that conflicts with any other provision of law shall prevail over the other provision of law, as to districts created under this part.

36604. Severability

This part is intended to be construed liberally and, if any provision is held invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Assessments levied under this part are not special taxes.

ARTICLE 2. Definitions

36606. “Activities”

“Activities” means, but is not limited to, all of the following that benefit businesses or real property in the district:
(a) Promotion of public events.
(b) Furnishing of music in any public place.
(c) Promotion of tourism within the district.
(d) Marketing and economic development, including retail retention and recruitment. (e) Providing security, sanitation, graffiti removal, street and sidewalk cleaning, and other municipal services supplemental to those normally provided by the municipality. (f) Other services provided for the purpose of conferring special benefit upon assessed real property or specific benefits upon assessed businesses located in the district.

36606.5. “Assessment”

“Assessment” means a levy for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, installing, or maintaining improvements and providing activities that will provide certain benefits to properties or businesses located within a property and business improvement district.

36607. “Business”

“Business” means all types of businesses and includes financial institutions and professions.

36608. “City”

“City” means a city, county, city and county, or an agency or entity created pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, the public member agencies of which includes only cities, counties, or a city and county, or the State of California.

36609. “City council”

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

27 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
“City council” means the city council of a city or the board of supervisors of a county, or the agency, commission, or board created pursuant to a joint powers agreement and which is a city within the meaning of this part.

36609.4. “Clerk”

“Clerk” means the clerk of the legislative body.

36609.5. “General benefit”

“General benefit” means, for purposes of a property-based district, any benefit that is not a “special benefit” as defined in Section 36615.5.

36610. “Improvement”

“Improvement” means the acquisition, construction, installation, or maintenance of any tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or more including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Parking facilities.
(b) Benches, booths, kiosks, display cases, pedestrian shelters and signs. (c) Trash receptacles and public restrooms.
(d) Lighting and heating facilities.
(e) Decorations.
(f) Parks.
(g) Fountains.
(h) Planting areas.
(i) Closing, opening, widening, or narrowing of existing streets. (j) Facilities or equipment, or both, to enhance security of persons and property within the district.
(k) Ramps, sidewalks, plazas, and pedestrian malls.
(l) Rehabilitation or removal of existing structures.

36611. “Management district plan”; “Plan”

“Management district plan” or “plan” means a proposal as defined in Section 36622.

36612. “Owners’ association”

“Owners’ association” means a private nonprofit entity that is under contract with a city to administer or implement improvements, maintenance, and activities specified in the management district plan. An owners’ association may be an existing nonprofit entity or a newly formed nonprofit entity. An owners’ association is a private entity and may not be considered a public entity for any purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials for any purpose. Notwithstanding this section, an owners’ association shall comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code), at all times when matters within the subject matter of the district are heard, discussed, or deliberated, and with the California Public Records Act (Division 10 ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

28 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
(commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code), for all records relating to activities of the district.

36614. “Property”

“Property” means real property situated within a district.

36614.5. “Property and business improvement district”; “District”

“Property and business improvement district,” or “district,” means a property and business improvement district established pursuant to this part.

36614.6. “Property-based assessment”

“Property-based assessment” means any assessment made pursuant to this part upon real property.

36614.7. “Property-based district”

“Property-based district” means any district in which a city levies a property-based assessment.

36615. “Property owner”; “Business owner”; “Owner”

“Property owner” means any person shown as the owner of land on the last equalized assessment roll or otherwise known to be the owner of land by the city council. “Business owner” means any person recognized by the city as the owner of the business. “Owner” means either a business owner or a property owner. The city council has no obligation to obtain other information as to the ownership of land or businesses, and its determination of ownership shall be final and conclusive for the purposes of this part. Wherever this part requires the signature of the property owner, the signature of the authorized agent of the property owner shall be sufficient. Wherever this part requires the signature of the business owner, the signature of the authorized agent of the business owner shall be sufficient.

36615.5. “Special benefit”

(a) “Special benefit” means, for purposes of a property-based district, a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in a district or to the public at large. Special benefit includes incidental or collateral effects that arise from the improvements, maintenance, or activities of property-based districts even if those incidental or collateral effects benefit property or persons not assessed.

Special benefit excludes general enhancement of property value.

(b) “Special benefit” also includes, for purposes of a property-based district, a particular and distinct benefit provided directly to each assessed parcel within the district. Merely because parcels throughout an assessment district share the same special benefits does not make the benefits general.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

29 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

36616. “Tenant”

“Tenant” means an occupant pursuant to a lease of commercial space or a dwelling unit, other than an owner.

ARTICLE 3. Prior Law

36617. Alternate method of financing certain improvements and activities; Effect on other provisions

This part provides an alternative method of financing certain improvements and activities. The provisions of this part shall not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or providing for the furnishing of improvements or activities or the raising of revenue for these purposes. Every improvement area established pursuant to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500) of this division) is valid and effective and is unaffected by this part.

CHAPTER 2. Establishment

36620. Establishment of property and business improvement district

A property and business improvement district may be established as provided in this chapter.

36620.5. Requirement of consent of city council

A county may not form a district within the territorial jurisdiction of a city without the consent of the city council of that city. A city may not form a district within the unincorporated territory of a county without the consent of the board of supervisors of that county. A city may not form a district within the territorial jurisdiction of another city without the consent of the city council of the other city.

36621. Initiation of proceedings; Petition of property or business owners in proposed district

(a) Upon the submission of a written petition, signed by the property or business owners in the proposed district who will pay more than 50 percent of the assessments proposed to be levied, the city council may initiate proceedings to form a district by the adoption of a resolution expressing its intention to form a district. The amount of assessment attributable to property or a business owned by the same property or business owner that is in excess of 40 percent of the amount of all assessments proposed to be levied, shall not be included in determining whether the petition is signed by property or business owners who will pay more than 50 percent of the total amount of assessments proposed to be levied.
(b) The petition of property or business owners required under subdivision (a) shall include a summary of the management district plan. That summary shall include all of the following:

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

30 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
(1) A map showing the boundaries of the district.
(2) Information specifying where the complete management district plan can be obtained.
(3) Information specifying that the complete management district plan shall be furnished upon request.
(c) The resolution of intention described in subdivision (a) shall contain all of the following:
(1) A brief description of the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment will be levied on property or businesses within the district, a statement as to whether bonds will be issued, and a description of the exterior boundaries of the proposed district, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The descriptions and statements do not need to be detailed and shall be sufficient if they enable an owner to generally identify the nature and extent of the improvements, maintenance, and activities, and the location and extent of the proposed district. (2) A time and place for a public hearing on the establishment of the property and business improvement district and the levy of assessments, which shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 36623.

36622. Contents of management district plan

The management district plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(a) If the assessment will be levied on property, a map of the district in sufficient detail to locate each parcel of property and, if businesses are to be assessed, each business within the district. If the assessment will be levied on businesses, a map that identifies the district boundaries in sufficient detail to allow a business owner to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the district boundaries. If the assessment will be levied on property and businesses, a map of the district in sufficient detail to locate each parcel of property and to allow a business owner to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the district boundaries. (b) The name of the proposed district.
(c) A description of the boundaries of the district, including the boundaries of benefit zones, proposed for establishment or extension in a manner sufficient to identify the affected property and businesses included, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The boundaries of a proposed property assessment district shall not overlap with the boundaries of another existing property assessment district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a district created pursuant to this part to overlap with other assessment districts established pursuant to other provisions of law, including, but not limited to, the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500)). This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to overlap with another business assessment district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to overlap with a property assessment district created pursuant to this part.
(d) The improvements, maintenance, and activities proposed for each year of operation of the district and the estimated cost thereof. If the improvements, maintenance, and activities proposed for each year of operation are the same, a description of the first ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

31 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
year’s proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities and a statement that the same improvements, maintenance, and activities are proposed for subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision.
(e) The total annual amount proposed to be expended for improvements, maintenance, or activities, and debt service in each year of operation of the district. If the assessment is levied on businesses, this amount may be estimated based upon the assessment rate.

If the total annual amount proposed to be expended in each year of operation of the district is not significantly different, the amount proposed to be expended in the initial year and a statement that a similar amount applies to subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision.
(f) The proposed source or sources of financing, including the proposed method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each property or business owner to calculate the amount of the assessment to be levied against their property or business. The plan also shall state whether bonds will be issued to finance improvements.
(g) The time and manner of collecting the assessments.
(h) The specific number of years in which assessments will be levied. In a new district, the maximum number of years shall be five. Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 years. Notwithstanding these limitations, a district created pursuant to this part to finance capital improvements with bonds may levy assessments until the maximum maturity of the bonds. The management district plan may set forth specific increases in assessments for each year of operation of the district. (i) The proposed time for implementation and completion of the management district plan.
(j) Any proposed rules and regulations to be applicable to the district. (k)
(1) A list of the properties or businesses to be assessed, including the assessor’s parcel numbers for properties to be assessed, and a statement of the method or methods by which the expenses of a district will be imposed upon benefited real property or businesses, in proportion to the benefit received by the property or business, to defray the cost thereof.
(2) In a property-based district, the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined exclusively in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the activities. An assessment shall not be imposed on any parcel that exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable, and a property-based district shall separate the general benefits, if any, from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. Parcels within a property-based district that are owned or used by any city, public agency, the State of California, or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the governmental entity can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit. The value of any incidental, secondary, or collateral effects that arise from the improvements, maintenance, or activities of a property-based district and that benefit property or persons not assessed shall not be deducted from the entirety of the cost of any special benefit or affect the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel. (3) In a property-based district, properties throughout the district may share the same special benefits. In a district with boundaries that define which parcels are to receive ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

32 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
improvements, maintenance, or activities over and above those services provided by the city, the improvements, maintenance, or activities themselves may constitute a special benefit. The city may impose assessments that are less than the proportional special benefit conferred, but shall not impose assessments that exceed the reasonable costs of the proportional special benefit conferred. Because one or more parcels pay less than the special benefit conferred does not necessarily mean that other parcels are assessed more than the reasonable cost of their special benefit. (l) In a property-based district, a detailed engineer’s report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California supporting all assessments contemplated by the management district plan.
(m) Any other item or matter required to be incorporated therein by the city council.

36623. Procedure to levy assessment

(a) If a city council proposes to levy a new or increased property assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure shall comply with Section 53753 of the Government Code.
(b) If a city council proposes to levy a new or increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure shall comply with Section 54954.6 of the Government Code, except that notice shall be mailed to the owners of the businesses proposed to be assessed. A protest may be made orally or in writing by any interested person. Every written protest shall be filed with the clerk at or before the time fixed for the public hearing. The city council may waive any irregularity in the form or content of any written protest. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing. Each written protest shall contain a description of the business in which the person subscribing the protest is interested sufficient to identify the business and, if a person subscribing is not shown on the official records of the city as the owner of the business, the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person subscribing is the owner of the business or the authorized representative. A written protest that does not comply with this section shall not be counted in determining a majority protest. If written protests are received from the owners or authorized representatives of businesses in the proposed district that will pay 50 percent or more of the assessments proposed to be levied and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than 50 percent, no further proceedings to levy the proposed assessment against such businesses, as contained in the resolution of intention, shall be taken for a period of one year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the city council.
(c) If a city council proposes to conduct a single proceeding to levy both a new or increased property assessment and a new or increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure for the property assessment shall comply with subdivision (a), and the notice and protest and hearing procedure for the business assessment shall comply with subdivision (b). If a majority protest is received from either the property or business owners, that respective portion of the assessment shall not be levied. The remaining portion of the assessment may be levied unless the improvement or other special benefit was proposed to be funded by assessing both property and business owners.

36624. Changes to proposed assessments
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

33 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026

At the conclusion of the public hearing to establish the district, the city council may adopt, revise, change, reduce, or modify the proposed assessment or the type or types of improvements, maintenance, and activities to be funded with the revenues from the assessments. Proposed assessments may only be revised by reducing any or all of them.

At the public hearing, the city council may only make changes in, to, or from the boundaries of the proposed property and business improvement district that will exclude territory that will not benefit from the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities. Any modifications, revisions, reductions, or changes to the proposed assessment district shall be reflected in the notice and map recorded pursuant to Section 36627.

36625. Resolution of formation

(a) If the city council, following the public hearing, decides to establish a proposed property and business improvement district, the city council shall adopt a resolution of formation that shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A brief description of the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment will be levied on property, businesses, or both within the district, a statement on whether bonds will be issued, and a description of the exterior boundaries of the proposed district, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The descriptions and statements need not be detailed and shall be sufficient if they enable an owner to generally identify the nature and extent of the improvements, maintenance, and activities and the location and extent of the proposed district. (2) The number, date of adoption, and title of the resolution of intention. (3) The time and place where the public hearing was held concerning the establishment of the district.
(4) A determination regarding any protests received. The city shall not establish the district or levy assessments if a majority protest was received. (5) A statement that the properties, businesses, or properties and businesses in the district established by the resolution shall be subject to any amendments to this part. (6) A statement that the improvements, maintenance, and activities to be conferred on businesses and properties in the district will be funded by the levy of the assessments.

The revenue from the levy of assessments within a district shall not be used to provide improvements, maintenance, or activities outside the district or for any purpose other than the purposes specified in the resolution of intention, as modified by the city council at the hearing concerning establishment of the district. Notwithstanding the foregoing, improvements and activities that must be provided outside the district boundaries to create a special or specific benefit to the assessed parcels or businesses may be provided, but shall be limited to marketing or signage pointing to the district. (7) A finding that the property or businesses within the area of the property and business improvement district will be benefited by the improvements, maintenance, and activities funded by the proposed assessments, and, for a property-based district, that property within the district will receive a special benefit. (8) In a property-based district, the total amount of all special benefits to be conferred on the properties within the property-based district.
(b) The adoption of the resolution of formation and, if required, recordation of the ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

34 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
notice and map pursuant to Section 36627 shall constitute the levy of an assessment in each of the fiscal years referred to in the management district plan.

36627. Notice and assessment diagram

Following adoption of the resolution establishing district assessments on properties pursuant to Section 36625, the clerk shall record a notice and an assessment diagram pursuant to Section 3114. No other provision of Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 3100) applies to an assessment district created pursuant to this part.

36628. Establishment of separate benefit zones within district; Categories of businesses

The city council may establish one or more separate benefit zones within the district based upon the degree of benefit derived from the improvements or activities to be provided within the benefit zone and may impose a different assessment within each benefit zone. If the assessment is to be levied on businesses, the city council may also define categories of businesses based upon the degree of benefit that each will derive from the improvements or activities to be provided within the district and may impose a different assessment or rate of assessment on each category of business, or on each category of business within each zone.

36628.5. Assessments on businesses or property owners

The city council may levy assessments on businesses or on property owners, or a combination of the two, pursuant to this part. The city council shall structure the assessments in whatever manner it determines corresponds with the distribution of benefits from the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, provided that any property-based assessment conforms with the requirements set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (k) of Section 36622.

36629. Provisions and procedures applicable to benefit zones and business categories

All provisions of this part applicable to the establishment, modification, or disestablishment of a property and business improvement district apply to the establishment, modification, or disestablishment of benefit zones or categories of business. The city council shall, to establish, modify, or disestablish a benefit zone or category of business, follow the procedure to establish, modify, or disestablish a property and business improvement district.

36630. Expiration of district; Creation of new district

If a property and business improvement district expires due to the time limit set pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 36622, a new management district plan may be created and the district may be renewed pursuant to this part.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

35 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
CHAPTER 3. Assessments

36631. Time and manner of collection of assessments; Delinquent payments

The collection of the assessments levied pursuant to this part shall be made at the time and in the manner set forth by the city council in the resolution levying the assessment.

Assessments levied on real property may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as for the ad valorem property tax, and may provide for the same lien priority and penalties for delinquent payment. All delinquent payments for assessments levied pursuant to this part may be charged interest and penalties.

36632. Assessments to be based on estimated benefit; Classification of real property and businesses; Exclusion of residential and agricultural property

(a) The assessments levied on real property pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the real property within the property and business improvement district. The city council may classify properties for purposes of determining the benefit to property of the improvements and activities provided pursuant to this part.
(b) Assessments levied on businesses pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the businesses within the property and business improvement district. The city council may classify businesses for purposes of determining the benefit to the businesses of the improvements and activities provided pursuant to this part. (c) Properties zoned solely for residential use, or that are zoned for agricultural use, are conclusively presumed not to benefit from the improvements and service funded through these assessments, and shall not be subject to any assessment pursuant to this part.

36633. Time for contesting validity of assessment

The validity of an assessment levied under this part shall not be contested in an action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding is commenced within 30 days after the resolution levying the assessment is adopted pursuant to Section 36625. An appeal from a final judgment in an action or proceeding shall be perfected within 30 days after the entry of judgment.

36634. Service contracts authorized to establish levels of city services

The city council may execute baseline service contracts that would establish levels of city services that would continue after a property and business improvement district has been formed.

36635. Request to modify management district plan

The owners’ association may, at any time, request that the city council modify the management district plan. Any modification of the management district plan shall be made pursuant to this chapter.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

36 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
36636. Modification of plan by resolution after public hearing; Adoption of resolution of intention

(a) Upon the written request of the owners’ association, the city council may modify the management district plan after conducting one public hearing on the proposed modifications. The city council may modify the improvements and activities to be funded with the revenue derived from the levy of the assessments by adopting a resolution determining to make the modifications after holding a public hearing on the proposed modifications. If the modification includes the levy of a new or increased assessment, the city council shall comply with Section 36623. Notice of all other public hearings pursuant to this section shall comply with both of the following:
(1) The resolution of intention shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city once at least seven days before the public hearing. (2) A complete copy of the resolution of intention shall be mailed by first class mail, at least 10 days before the public hearing, to each business owner or property owner affected by the proposed modification.
(b) The city council shall adopt a resolution of intention which states the proposed modification prior to the public hearing required by this section. The public hearing shall be held not more than 90 days after the adoption of the resolution of intention.

36637. Reflection of modification in notices recorded and maps

Any subsequent modification of the resolution shall be reflected in subsequent notices and maps recorded pursuant to Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 3100), in a manner consistent with the provisions of Section 36627.

36638. Assessment as government imposed fee on Civ C § 1770 transaction

(a) A business assessment pursuant to this part is a fee imposed by a government on the transaction for purposes of paragraph (29) of subdivision (a) of Section 1770 of the Civil Code.
(b) This section shall become operative on July 1, 2024.

CHAPTER 3.5. Financing

36640. Bonds authorized; Procedure; Restriction on reduction or termination of assessments

(a) The city council may, by resolution, determine and declare that bonds shall be issued to finance the estimated cost of some or all of the proposed improvements described in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, if the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to that section provides for the issuance of bonds, under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10 (commencing with Section 8500)) or in conjunction with Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 (Article 4 (commencing with Section 6584) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code). Either act, as the case may be, shall govern the proceedings relating to the issuance of bonds, although proceedings under the Bond Act of 1915 may be modified by the city council as necessary to accommodate assessments levied ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

37 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
upon business pursuant to this part.
(b) The resolution adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall generally describe the proposed improvements specified in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, set forth the estimated cost of those improvements, specify the number of annual installments and the fiscal years during which they are to be collected. The amount of debt service to retire the bonds shall not exceed the amount of revenue estimated to be raised from assessments over 30 years.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, assessments levied to pay the principal and interest on any bond issued pursuant to this section shall not be reduced or terminated if doing so would interfere with the timely retirement of the debt.

CHAPTER 4. Governance

36650. Report by owners’ association; Approval or modification by city council

(a) The owners’ association shall cause to be prepared a report for each fiscal year, except the first year, for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvements, maintenance, and activities described in the report. The owners’ association’s first report shall be due after the first year of operation of the district. The report may propose changes, including, but not limited to, the boundaries of the property and business improvement district or any benefit zones within the district, the basis and method of levying the assessments, and any changes in the classification of property, including any categories of business, if a classification is used. (b) The report shall be filed with the clerk and shall refer to the property and business improvement district by name, specify the fiscal year to which the report applies, and, with respect to that fiscal year, shall contain all of the following information:
(1) Any proposed changes in the boundaries of the property and business improvement district or in any benefit zones or classification of property or businesses within the district.
(2) The improvements, maintenance, and activities to be provided for that fiscal year. (3) An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements, maintenance, and activities for that fiscal year.
(4) The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each real property or business owner, as appropriate, to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her property or business for that fiscal year. (5) The estimated amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year.
(6) The estimated amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied pursuant to this part.
(c) The city council may approve the report as filed by the owners’ association or may modify any particular contained in the report and approve it as modified. Any modification shall be made pursuant to Sections 36635 and 36636.

The city council shall not approve a change in the basis and method of levying assessments that would impair an authorized or executed contract to be paid from the revenues derived from the levy of assessments, including any commitment to pay principal and interest on any bonds issued on behalf of the district.

36651. Designation of owners’ association to provide improvements, ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

38 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
maintenance, and activities

The management district plan may, but is not required to, state that an owners’ association will provide the improvements, maintenance, and activities described in the management district plan. If the management district plan designates an owners’ association, the city shall contract with the designated nonprofit corporation to provide services.

CHAPTER 5. Renewal

36660. Renewal of district; Transfer or refund of remaining revenues; District term limit

(a) Any district previously established whose term has expired, or will expire, may be renewed by following the procedures for establishment as provided in this chapter. (b) Upon renewal, any remaining revenues derived from the levy of assessments, or any revenues derived from the sale of assets acquired with the revenues, shall be transferred to the renewed district. If the renewed district includes additional parcels or businesses not included in the prior district, the remaining revenues shall be spent to benefit only the parcels or businesses in the prior district. If the renewed district does not include parcels or businesses included in the prior district, the remaining revenues attributable to these parcels shall be refunded to the owners of these parcels or businesses. (c) Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 years, or, if the district is authorized to issue bonds, until the maximum maturity of those bonds. There is no requirement that the boundaries, assessments, improvements, or activities of a renewed district be the same as the original or prior district.

CHAPTER 6. Disestablishment

36670. Circumstances permitting disestablishment of district; Procedure

(a) Any district established or extended pursuant to the provisions of this part, where there is no indebtedness, outstanding and unpaid, incurred to accomplish any of the purposes of the district, may be disestablished by resolution by the city council in either of the following circumstances:
(1) If the city council finds there has been misappropriation of funds, malfeasance, or a violation of law in connection with the management of the district, it shall notice a hearing on disestablishment.
(2) During the operation of the district, there shall be a 30-day period each year in which assessees may request disestablishment of the district. The first such period shall begin one year after the date of establishment of the district and shall continue for 30 days. The next such 30-day period shall begin two years after the date of the establishment of the district. Each successive year of operation of the district shall have such a 30-day period. Upon the written petition of the owners or authorized representatives of real property or the owners or authorized representatives of businesses in the district who pay 50 percent or more of the assessments levied, the city council shall pass a resolution of intention to disestablish the district. The city council shall notice a hearing on disestablishment.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

39 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
(b) The city council shall adopt a resolution of intention to disestablish the district prior to the public hearing required by this section. The resolution shall state the reason for the disestablishment, shall state the time and place of the public hearing, and shall contain a proposal to dispose of any assets acquired with the revenues of the assessments levied within the property and business improvement district. The notice of the hearing on disestablishment required by this section shall be given by mail to the property owner of each parcel or to the owner of each business subject to assessment in the district, as appropriate. The city shall conduct the public hearing not less than 30 days after mailing the notice to the property or business owners. The public hearing shall be held not more than 60 days after the adoption of the resolution of intention.

36671. Refund of remaining revenues upon disestablishment or expiration without renewal of district; Calculation of refund; Use of outstanding revenue collected after disestablishment of district

(a) Upon the disestablishment or expiration without renewal of a district, any remaining revenues, after all outstanding debts are paid, derived from the levy of assessments, or derived from the sale of assets acquired with the revenues, or from bond reserve or construction funds, shall be refunded to the owners of the property or businesses then located and operating within the district in which assessments were levied by applying the same method and basis that was used to calculate the assessments levied in the fiscal year in which the district is disestablished or expires. All outstanding assessment revenue collected after disestablishment shall be spent on improvements and activities specified in the management district plan.
(b) If the disestablishment occurs before an assessment is levied for the fiscal year, the method and basis that was used to calculate the assessments levied in the immediate prior fiscal year shall be used to calculate the amount of any refund.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

40 RCTBID Management District Plan
June 16, 2026
APPENDIX 2 – ASSESSED LODGING BUSINESSES*

*List as of February 26, 2026
Business
Name
Address
Best Western Plus Rancho Cordova Inn 10713 White Rock Rd Rancho Cordova Rancho Cordova Inn near Lake Natoma 12249 Folsom Blvd Rancho Cordova Courtyard Sacramento Rancho Cordova 10683 White Rock Rd Rancho Cordova Days Inn & Suites Rancho Cordova 3240 Mather Field Rd Rancho Cordova Townplace Suites by Marriott 11212 Point East Dr Rancho Cordova Extended Stay America 10721 White Rock Rd Rancho Cordova Fairfield Inn & Suites Rancho Cordova 10745 Gold Center Dr Rancho Cordova Hampton Inn Sacramento Rancho Cordova 10755 Gold Center Dr Rancho Cordova Holiday Inn Sacramento Rancho Cordova 11269 Point East Dr Rancho Cordova Studio 6 11299 Point East Dr Rancho Cordova
Homewood Suites by Hilton Rancho
Cordova Sacramento

10700 White Rock Rd

Rancho Cordova
Hyatt Place Sacramento Rancho Cordova 10744 Gold Center Dr Rancho Cordova La Quinta Inn & Suites -Rancho Cordova 11131 Folsom Blvd Rancho Cordova Motel 6 Rancho Cordova 10694 Olson Dr Rancho Cordova
California Inn Rancho Cordova 10800 Olson Dr Rancho Cordova Residence Inn Sacramento Rancho Cordova 2779 Prospect Park Dr Rancho Cordova Sacramento Marriott Rancho Cordova 11211 Point East Dr Rancho Cordova ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

1 Modification of the Rancho Cordova
Tourism Business Improvement
District
Declaring Results of Majority Protest
ProceedingsJuly 6, 2026
CityOfRanchoCordova.org
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 4

2 Rancho Cordova Tourism Business Improvement
District (RCTBID)
The Rancho Cordova Tourism Business Improvement District (RCTBID) is a benefit assessment district proposed to continue a revenue source to help fund marketing and sales promotions and destination development programs for assessed Rancho Cordova lodging businesses. This approach has been used successfully in other destination areas throughout the state to improve tourism and drive additional room nights to assessed businesses. • The RCTBID was established on December 6, 2010
• On April 19, 2021 the Management District Plan was renewed, thereby renewing the RCTIB f
or an additional 10 years
• On May 18, 2026, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to initiate proceedings a
nd to modify the RCTBID
• On June 15, 2026, the City Council allowed public testimony on the modification of the R
CTBID and levy of assessments
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 4

3 Proposed Rancho Cordova Tourism Business
Improvement District (RCTBID) Modifications
Zone Assessment
Rate
DOVA Zone 6.0%
Zone 1 4.5%
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 4

4 Rancho Cordova Tourism Business Improvement
District (RCTBID) Modification Process
RCTBID Modification Process
May 18, 2026 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION
Upon the submission of a written request from the Owners’ Association of the RCTBID, the City Council (Council) may initiate proceedings to modify the RCTBID by the adoption of a resolution expressing its intention to modify the RCTBID.

No later than
May 22, 2026

NOTICE
The 94 Law requires the City to mail written notice to the owners of all businesses proposed to be assessed within the RCTBID. Mailing the notice begins a mandatory forty-five (45) day period in which assessed business owners may protest RCTBID modification.

June 15, 2026 PUBLIC MEETING
Allow public testimony on the modification of the RCTBID and levy of assessments. No Council action required.

July 6, 2026 FINAL PUBLIC HEARING
If written protests are received from the owners of businesses in the modified RCTBID which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the assessments proposed to be levied, and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than fifty percent (50%), no further proceedings to levy the proposed assessment against such businesses shall be taken for a period of one (1) year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the Council.

ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 4

5 Next Steps & Recommendation
For Council's Consideration:
• Receive all written protests from the owners of businesses in the proposed mo
dified RCTBID
• If received written protests are greater than 50%, no further proceedings t
o levy the assessment shall be taken for one year
• If received written protests are less than 50%, the resolution to approve t
he RCTBID modifications shall move forward to City Council approval • The modification of the RCTBID Plan will include:
• The boundaries of the RCTBID shall be modified to establish t
wo (2) benefit zones, as shown on the map previously
attached
• The modified annual assessment rate for all lodging businesses w
ith two (2) rooms or more as shown in the table
• For City Council consideration, approve the resolution modifying the RCTBID Zone Assessment Rate
DOVA Zone 6.0%
Zone 1 4.5%
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 4

6 THANK YOU
CityOfRanchoCordova.org
ITEM 11.1.

ATTACHMENT 4

MEMORANDUM

City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 12.1.

DATE: July 6, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Laura Fickle, Economic Development Manager
Stefan Heisler, Housing Manager

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF LOCAL

AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA

GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT FOR OPPORTUNITY ZONES 2.0 CENSUS TRACT

DESIGNATIONS AND RELATED ACTIONS

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would allow the City Manager, or his designee, to submit Local Authority Recommendation forms for four eligible census tracts to the California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development for the Opportunity Zones 2.0 program.

BACKGROUND

Opportunity Zones 2.0 is the renewed federal program intended to encourage the reinvestment of capital gains into economically distressed communities through preferential federal tax treatment for qualifying investments in designated census tracts. The Governor of California will nominate eligible census tracts for certification by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz), in coordination with the State Department of Finance, is accepting local authority recommendations to help inform that nomination process. The City of Rancho Cordova may recommend eligible census tracts through the GO-Biz Local Authority Recommendation Form, with one form required per tract, the full 11-digit census tract GEOID required, and completed recommendations due on July 25, 2026.

Opportunity Zone designation provides an additional economic development incentive tool to be used by the city as an investment-attraction platform rather than as a stand-alone grant program or project approval. Designation can help make selected tracts more visible to Qualified Opportunity Funds, developers, landowners, businesses, housing partners, infrastructure partners, and investors with eligible capital gains. The city's strongest approach is to nominate tracts that combine demonstrated community need with investment readiness, including committed public investment, Housing Element or Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) alignment, shovel-ready or near-term development sites, potential tax increment

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

financing opportunities, regional partnerships, and a clear connection to sectors such as housing, infrastructure, healthcare, manufacturing, transportation and logistics, clean economy, or aerospace and defense.

Staff recommends that the city submit up to four eligible census tracts for Opportunity Zones

2.0 consideration, ranked in order of importance as set forth below. Staff has confirmed each tract's eligibility against the official U.S. Treasury list and will coordinate with Sacramento County where tracts overlap city and county boundaries, document committed public investment and other supporting information, and prepare consistent submittal language for each Local Authority Recommendation Form. Because each census tract can only be nominated by one jurisdiction, staff is coordinating with Sacramento County regarding our Priority 1 census tract (Mather area) for submittal.

Priority 1 - Census Tract 06067008803: Consisting primarily of the former Mather Air Force Base and areas within unincorporated Sacramento County extending south to Excelsior Road and Kiefer Boulevard

Priority 2 - Census Tract 06067009007: Which includes the South White Rock neighborhood and business areas along Rockingham Drive and Old Placerville Road

Priority 3 - Census Tract 06067009006: Which includes neighborhoods south of Highway 50 west of Old Placerville Road and east of Routier Road, and areas north of Highway 50 west of Mather Field Road, south of Folsom Boulevard, and east of Bradshaw Road

Priority 4 - Census Tract 06067009008: Which includes the neighborhoods north of Highway 50, east of Mather Field Road, south of Folsom Blvd, and west of Zinfandel Drive

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Recommended Census Tracts Map

3. Presentation

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 1

Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF LOCAL AUTHORITY

RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR OPPORTUNITY ZONES 2.0 CENSUS TRACT

DESIGNATIONS AND RELATED ACTIONS

WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova is a municipal corporation and a local jurisdictional authority within the State of California; and

WHEREAS, the federal Opportunity Zone Program was established to encourage the reinvestment of capital gains into economically distressed communities by offering preferential federal tax treatment for qualified investments located within designated low-income census tracts; and

WHEREAS, Opportunity Zones 2.0 renews and updates the program for a new round of census tract designations, with new designations expected to take effect for qualifying investments made on or after January 1, 2027; and

WHEREAS, the Governor of California may nominate only a portion of eligible census tracts for certification as Qualified Opportunity Zones, making local prioritization and supporting documentation important to the State's review; and

WHEREAS, the California Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, in coordination with the California Department of Finance, has initiated a Local Authority Recommendation Form process through which cities, counties, special districts, regional joint powers authorities, councils of governments, and tribal governments may recommend eligible census tracts for the Governor's consideration; and

WHEREAS, only census tracts that appear on the official Qualified Opportunity Zones Eligible Tract list published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury may be recommended through the local authority process; and

WHEREAS, the city desires to recommend up to four eligible census tracts, ranked in order of importance, that are expected to support housing production, infrastructure delivery, business growth, redevelopment, job creation, community revitalization, and attraction of private investment; and

WHEREAS, certain candidate census tracts may overlap city and county boundaries or otherwise involve regional assets, public investments, or partner agencies, and the city desires to coordinate with Sacramento County and other public, private, nonprofit, and community partners to support accurate and consistent recommendations; and

WHEREAS, the City Council finds that submitting local authority recommendations is consistent with the city's economic development, housing, infrastructure, and community revitalization objectives; and

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 1

Resolution No. XX-2026 Page 2 of 2

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Manager or designee to finalize, execute, and submit the required Local Authority Recommendation Forms and related information in substantial conformance with this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the submission of local authority recommendations to the California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development for Opportunity Zones

2.0 Census Tract Designations and related actions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of July 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Garrett Gatewood, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Opportunity Zones 2.0
Recommended Census Tracts for Nomination
Nominated Tracts:

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

1 Opportunity Zones 2.0
Local Recommendation Process
CityOfRanchoCordova.org
ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

2 A Resolution authorizing the submission of local authority recommendations to the California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development for Opportunity Zones 2.0 census tract designations and related actions.

For Council Consideration
ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

3 • Provide an overview of Opportunity Zones 2.0
• Describe the c ity’s role in the nomination process
• Present the staff recommendation for priority census tracts Presentation Objectives
ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

4 Program Purpose:
• Federal program to encourage long-t erm private investment • Provides tax incentives for Qualified Fund investments • Supports economic development and job creation
• Does not provide direct funding to the ci ty, but federal grants may increasingly be directed towards Opportunity Zone identified census tracts • Opportunity Zones 2.0 launches a new round for designations using updated eligibility dat
a
Eligible Census Tracts:
• Must meet federal economic distress criteria:
• Poverty rate of at least 20% and median family income less than 125% of the area m
edian, or
• Median family income at or below 70% of the area median • Only eligible census tracts may be nominated for Opportunity Zones 2.0 designation Opportunity Zones 2.0 Program
ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

5 Key milestones in the nomination process include:
• July 25, 2026 – Loc al recommendations due to the State • August, 2026 – T he State will release the preliminary list of nominated tracts and open the public comment window
• July-S eptember 2026 – State reviews recommendations and establishes California’s final nominations
• End of S eptember, 2026 – Governor submits nominations to the U.S. Department of the Treasury
• January 1, 2027 – T reasury certifies the final Opportunity Zones 2.0 designations • Designation Period – O pportunity Zones designations remain in effect for 10 years, through December 31, 2036, providing a long-term opportunity to attract private investment • Current Zones - C urrently designated Opportunity Zones (from 2018) will remain in effect until December 31, 2028, creating a 2-year overlap period Opportunity Zones 2.0 Selection Timeline
ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

6 Staff Recommended
Census Tracts
Recommended Eligible Tracts
Proposed Priority Order:

1. 88.03

2. 90.07

3. 90.06

4. 90.08
T
racts selected based on:
• Eligibility
• Development opportunity:
• Vacant land
• Underutilized sites
• Office/industrial or
mi
xed use/multifamily
housing zoning
ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

7 Staff Recommendation and Next Steps
• Staff Recommendation: Adopt the resolution
• If Adopted:
• Staff will collaborate with Sacramento County to submit one nomination form for census t
ract 88.03 (Mather)
• Staff will submit nomination forms for the three other nominated census tracts along with t
he City Council’s resolution of support
• During the public comment window in August, staff will gather and submit letters of s
upport from area property owners, developers, businesses and agencies • Further educ ation and economic strategic planning and collaboration with stakeholders will take place to identify potential projects and market opportunities for the tracts that are selected by the Governor’s Office of Economic Development ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

8 THANK YOU
Questions or Comments?
CityOfRanchoCordova.org
ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 3

City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 5

MEMORANDUM

ITEM 12.2.

DATE: July 6, 2026

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Arlene Granadosin-Jones, AICP, Planning Manager

SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION ON THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE

PREFERRED LAND USE ALTERNATIVE

RECOMMENDATION
Review and discuss the Land Use Alternatives, consider the community feedback and the Planning Commission recommendations, and recommend approval of a Preferred Land Use Alternative.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Preferred Land Use Alternative will be the proposed Land Use Diagram for the updated 2050 General Plan. Approval of a Preferred Land Use Alternative will also enable the project team to initiate the General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report and move to the next phase of the project, which focuses on formulating draft goals and policies for different elements in the General Plan.

BACKGROUND
A General Plan is the city’s guiding policy document for meeting the community’s long-term vision for the future. General Plans are required by California law to address the mandated elements in Government Code Section 65302, including land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, safety and environmental justice. A General Plan is typically a 20-year community vision for how the city will grow.

City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 5

The City of Rancho Cordova's General Plan was adopted in 2006 and has undergone a few minor updates throughout the years. Given changing economic conditions, environmental considerations, housing needs, and new State requirements, this General Plan update provides an opportunity for the city to reaffirm and identify new goals to guide growth in the community through the year 2050.

LAND USE ALTERNATIVES
The General Plan Update process provides an opportunity for the Rancho Cordova community to shape future growth within the city. The land use alternatives phase asks community members to help determine the location, type, and intensity of future development.

Each alternative presents various concepts that represent different options for the future in Rancho Cordova, addressing goals for housing, jobs, entertainment options, and gatherings places within bikeable/walkable neighborhoods and districts. The complete Land Use Alternatives Report is included as Attachment 1.

While the alternatives vary in the extent and distribution of land uses, they all focus on the following objectives:
• Removing barriers to infill development to encourage new development and reinvestment in older parts of Rancho Cordova;
• Allowing flexibility for new uses in office parks to encourage them to adapt to changing trends;
• Promoting a wider variety of housing types along commercial corridors, in office parks, and in transit-rich areas to meet housing needs and invigorate these areas with new residents;
• Creating more neighborhood and community gathering places and dynamic entertainment options for residents and visitors from the region.

City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 5

COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOR LAND USE ALTERNATIVES PHASE
Community outreach for the land use alternatives phase focused on working with the community to identify land use options that will shape the future of the city, including reimagining underused office parks, and creating vibrant places where people can live, gather, and discover. The goals of this phase of engagement were to continue raising awareness about the General Plan Update and land use alternatives and to gather a broad range of community feedback to understand preferences for future land use and development. The team focused on connecting with youth, longtime and new residents, workers, and other representative community member groups through in-person and online methods. The feedback collected during this community outreach phase has been used to inform the preferred land use alternative.

The Land Use Alternatives Phase community outreach included the following events:

• Community Workshop on February 26, 2026
• Two pop-up events at the Farmer’s Market and KP International on March 14, 2026 • Cordova High School Outreach on February 26, 2026
• Online Feedback Form Available from February 26 through April 1, 2026 • Youth Career Workshop at Hagan Park on April 11, 2026 • Three stakeholder meetings hosted by Folsom Cordova Community Partnership on April 14, April 15, and April 16, 2026

As of mid-April 2026, approximately 200 people were engaged in this specific phase of the project. A full report of the community outreach events is provided in Attachment 2.

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON PREFERRED LAND USE ALTERNATIVE On April 22, 2026, city staff presented the General Plan Update Staff Recommended Land Use Alternative for Planning Commission consideration. The Planning Commission highlighted the following matters during their deliberation and discussion on future land use designations in the city:

• Conserving some existing office professional uses to support any future potential high- tech businesses that may return to the office parks
• Providing flexibility in land use for the office parks to accommodate future uses • Challenges for new development along Folsom Boulevard and maintaining commercial uses that serve as activity centers
• Multi-level development may be more expensive, so carefully consider the appropriate density
• Consider how traffic will be affected by additional density and intensity along Folsom Boulevard

City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 5
• Encouraging multiple activity centers throughout the community along with a “Downtown”
• There are many existing State laws that limit the ability to regulate higher density housing

After the discussion, Planning Commission voted to recommend the Staff Recommended Land Use Alternative to the City Council for approval. The Staff Recommended Land Use Alternative identifies specific General Plan land use designations for all parcels within the city and also highlights key areas of change. The Staff Recommended Land Use Alternative incorporates the following Planning Strategies:

• Planning Strategy #1: Reimagining Office Parks. Community feedback favored Alternative A, which removes the restrictive 50 percent office mandate and allows mixed- use redevelopment at densities up to 40 units per acre. However, given the community support for even higher densities expressed in the feedback on Planning Strategy #5 and the Mixed-use Multifamily Housing Study concepts, city staff is recommending Alternative B, which allows a maximum density to 80 units/acre and includes the Advanced Industrial land use designation to preserve employment-only areas. • Planning Strategy #2: Removing Barriers to Redeveloping Folsom Boulevard.

Consistent with community feedback, city staff is recommending Alternative B, which applies the higher-density version of Transit Corridor Mixed-Use (TCMU), allowing densities up to 60 units/acre, and a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) overlay permitting up to 100 units/acre near light rail stations. • Planning Strategy #3: Reenvisioning the Downtown. Community feedback generally favored Alternative B's model of dispersed activity centers distributed throughout the city; however, there was also community support for a new City Center surrounding the proposed arena. Staff is recommending a hybrid of Alternatives A and B, which replaces the Convention Overlay with a new Entertainment Mixed-Use District (EMUD) land use designation and identifies a new larger City Center Planning Area in response to City Council's desire for a centralized downtown focused on entertainment and housing. • Planning Strategy #4: Activating Commercial Centers. Consistent with community feedback, Staff is recommending Alternative A, which designates most commercial nodes as Commercial Mixed-Use (CMU). The updated CMU designation provides greater flexibility to accommodate a mix of uses at these activity centers throughout the city, including standalone residential at densities of 10-30 units per acre. • Planning Strategy #5: Increasing Housing Choices in Infill Areas. Consistent with community feedback, Staff is recommending Alternative B, which provides higher densities within the Transit Corridor Mixed-Use (TCMU) and Innovation Mixed-Use (IMU) land use designations.

The Staff Recommended Land Use Alternative, as shown in Attachment 3, is a result of input and feedback received during the community outreach activities focused on the land use alternatives and further review and analysis by the General Plan Technical Advisory Committee.

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION ON PREFERRED LAND USE ALTERNATIVE On May 26, 2026, city staff presented the General Plan Update Preferred Land Use Alternative for consideration. The City Council highlighted the following topics during their discussion on future land use designations in the city:

City Council Staff Report – Page 5 of 5
• Consider the balance between residential and employment generating uses, especially in the office parks and commercial areas.
• Encourage and support high-quality development that contributes to a cohesive environment and strong public realm.
• Review areas proposed for increased residential densities to ensure future development is consistent with city goals and priorities.
• Consider expansion of “City Center” area to include City Hall, the Sacramento Children’s Museum, and other surrounding parcels.
• Future land uses should support a city with adequate infrastructure, amenities, and utilities.

After the discussion, City Council instructed staff to continue the discussion at a subsequent meeting and provide responses to the different concerns brought up by councilmembers.

Tonight’s meeting will review recommended revisions to the Preferred Land Use Alternative previously recommended for approval by Planning Commission and city staff.

FISCAL IMPACT
The city has collected $1.3 million in General Plan fees through the issuance of permits that will go towards the cost of the General Plan update. The remaining cost will come from the general fund.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Land Use Alternatives Report

2. Phase 3 Community Outreach Summary Report

3. Staff Recommended Land Use Alternative

4. Presentation

LAND USE ALTERNATIVES REPORT
February 2026
ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 i
Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................... 0 Purpose of the Land Use Alternatives ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview of the General Plan Update ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Community Engagement ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Vision and Guiding Principles ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

2. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Existing 2006 General Plan .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Specific Plan Development Capacity ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Growth Projections .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Environmental Constraints .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13

3. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................................................. 15 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Land Use Designations ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17

4. PLANNING STRATEGIES ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Planning Strategy #1: Reimagining Office Parks ............................................................................................................................................................... 29 Planning Strategy #2: Removing Barriers to Redeveloping Folsom Boulevard .................................................................................................. 32 Planning Strategy #3: Reenvisioning the Downtown ..................................................................................................................................................... 35 Planning Strategy #4: Activating Commercial Centers ................................................................................................................................................. 38 Planning Strategy #5: Increasing Housing Choices in Infill Areas .............................................................................................................................. 41

5. COMPARISON ..................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Development Capacity ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 Transportation Impacts ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 51 Fiscal Impacts .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53 GHG Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 56 APPENDIX .............................................................................................................................................................................. 57 ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 0

1. INTRODUCTION
This section describes the purpose of the Land Use Alternatives Report and provides an overview of the broader General Plan Update process. It summarizes community input gathered since the process began in May 2024 and presents the vision and guiding principles that guide each phase of the General Plan Update.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 1
Purpose of the Land Use Alternatives
The General Plan Update process provides an opportunity for the Rancho Cordova community to shape future growth
within the city. During this land use alternatives phase, community members are being asked to help determine the location, type, and intensity of future development. These alternatives are based on input provided by community
members and elected and appointed officials over the past year, as well as city staff and consultant team expertise.

The purpose of this Land Use Alternatives Report is to
provide the city with a framework for making decisions about how to accommodate future development, support a range of housing options, encourage economic growth, and maintain fiscal sustainability. The community is being asked to review three different land use alternatives and consider the best path to achieve Rancho Cordova’s vision for the future.

Community feedback on these alternatives will help create the Preferred Land Use Alternative, which will become the city’s new General Plan Land Use Diagram that establishes rules for how properties can develop. Community feedback will be
presented to decision-makers as they consider making
changes to the Land Use Diagram. Ultimately it is the City Council who will provide direction on the Preferred
Alternative. The Preferred Alternative does not have to be just one of these alternatives. Instead, it will likely combine the best features from each alternative along with new ideas from public discussions.

FIGURE 1: LAND USE ALTERNATIVES PROCESS
ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 2
Overview of the General Plan Update
What is a General Plan?
Every city and county in California must have a general plan, which provides a long-term framework for future
development. The general plan represents the community’s vision of the future and contains goals and policies upon which elected officials, appointed commissioners, and staff base their decisions.

The Rancho Cordova General Plan will contain topical
chapters called “elements.” Each element will contain goals, policies, and programs designed to implement the community vision and address the issues and opportunities facing the city through 2050. The Preferred Land Use Alternative will
become the General Plan Land Use Diagram included in the Land Use Element and will be accompanied by policies to guide development in the city.

General Plan Update Process
The City of Rancho Cordova initiated the General Plan update in May 2024. The General Plan Update consists of several phases shown in Figure 2 to the right. The city has completed the project initiation, existing conditions, and visioning phases and is currently (Spring 2026) working on the land use
alternatives. Following the land use alternatives phase, the city will be preparing the 2050 General Plan and analyzing the impacts in an environmental impact report. The city
anticipates adoption of the Rancho Cordova 2050 General Plan in mid-2027.

FIGURE 2: GENERAL PLAN PROCESS
ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 3
Community Engagement
Workshop #1: Issues, Opportunities, Assets, and
Big Ideas
The city kicked off community engagement on the General Plan Update in October 2024 with a focus on issues,
opportunities, assets, and big ideas. Across all the outreach activities, which included a community workshop, pop-up events, and online survey, the following key themes emerged:
• Education and youth opportunities: Participants noted that there aren’t enough quality schools in Rancho
Cordova to serve the youth, and wanted to see more
programming, social spaces, and educational opportunities for future generations.
• Vibrant, accessible, local community: Participants
expressed a desire for denser, more walkable/bikeabl
e
n
eighborhoods, with amenities, attractions, and public
spaces/events that bring community together.
• Protect and enjoy Rancho Cordova’s natural spaces:

Participants highly value the parks, river, and other open spaces in Rancho Cordova, and are enthusiastic about
creating more opportunities for outdoor recreation
.
• Affordable housing, thriving local economy: Participants were supportive of affordable housing options and local employment opportunities, so all Rancho Cordovans can
thrive in their city.

The top priority among participants was to create a new, energetic downtown in Rancho Cordova. Protecting the
environment, improving public safety, and investing in
entertainment, arts, and culture were also among top
priorities.

Workshop #2: Vision & Guiding Principles and
Land Use Changes
The second phase of engagement, which took place from
February through April 2025, was focused on refining the vision statement and guiding principles that were drafted based on community feedback from the first phase of
engagement and gathering ideas about potential land use changes. Community members shared their ideas at a
community workshop, at pop-up events, and through an
online survey.

Across all the outreach activities during the second phase of engagement, the following key themes emerged:
• Create a vibrant downtown and gathering places
• Protect and enjoy Rancho Cordova’s natural spaces
• Add multifamily housing where it makes sense
• Provide additional middle and high schools
• Improve connectivity throughout Rancho Cordova
• Provide a medical Center for Rancho Cordova residents ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 4
Vision and Guiding Principles
The main outcome of community engagement efforts to date is the 2050 General Plan vision and guiding principles shown below. 2050 VISION STATEMENT
The City of Rancho Cordova is an inclusive and welcoming city that cultivates a deep sense of belonging for all. This vibrant community of strong, established neighborhoods connected to one another with well-planned roadways, trails, parks and open space networks is known in the region as a dynamic destination for good jobs, rich culture, diverse shopping and dining, and abundant outdoor recreation. Rancho Cordova celebrates the beauty of the natural environment through preservation and enhancement of its connection to the American River and wide-open spaces.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 5
Guiding Principles

GATHERING PLACES
Create vibrant activity centers that serve as local
gathering places and regional destinations for socializing, shopping, dining, and entertainment. Cultivate a unique identity and sense of place in these centers through
attractive streetscapes, active public spaces, and
dedicated spaces for local small businesses.

SUSTAINABILITY
Prioritize sustainability through smart and fiscally-
responsible land use patterns that create a balanced and integrated mix of uses, preserve natural resources,
improve air quality, support active transportation, and promote a healthy community.

ENTERTAINMENT, ARTS, AND CULTURE
Establish Rancho Cordova as a premier regional
destination for entertainment, arts, music, and culture by creating vibrant civic spaces and entertainment venues
that foster a variety of events and programs that
celebrate the city’s unique cultures, honor its history, attract visitors, and enhance community pride and
connection.

NEIGHBORHOODS
Ensure all residential areas throughout the city are
walkable neighborhoods that promote diverse housing
options and foster strong community identity and social interactions. Strengthen connections from residential
neighborhoods to parks, schools, shopping, jobs, and
amenities and revitalize older areas to foster unity and a sense of one cohesive city.

ECONOMIC PROSPERITY
Strengthen Rancho Cordova’s position as a dynamic
regional economic center by encouraging the creative
evolution of commercial and employment areas, adopting
emerging technologies, positioning the City as a hub for innovation and future-ready industries - all while
supporting long-term fiscal sustainability.

ACCESS TO OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
Ensure access to safe, well-maintained parks, open
spaces, and recreational opportunities that foster
community well-being and promote healthy connections
to the natural environment for all residents. Enhance
access to the American River Parkway as a vital regional asset.

MOBILITY
Create a comprehensive, interconnected transportation
network that ensures a range of safe, attractive, and
convenient transportation options for people of all ages and abilities to walk, bike, roll, drive, and take public transit throughout all areas of the city. Invest in improved infrastructure and explore emerging mobility solutions to ensure Rancho Cordova remains adaptable, forward-
thinking, and accessible for all.

UPLIFT OUR YOUTH
Support Rancho Cordova’s identity as a family-friendly
community by empowering and uplifting the youth of our
community. Foster access to high-quality education,
enriching extracurricular activities, and safe and inclusive spaces that ensure the next generation is equipped to
thrive and contribute to a bright future.

HEALTHY COMMUNITY FOR ALL
Ensure Rancho Cordova is a thriving and healthy city
where all people have access to clean air, water, nutritious food, recreation, and opportunities to participate in civic life.

SAFETY
Enhance community safety and livability by providing
effective and responsive police, fire, and emergency
response services, and proactively planning for long-term resilience to climate-related risks.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 6

2. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT
This section provides an overview of the planning framework that informs the General Plan update. It summarizes the City’s 2006 General Plan, outlines relevant growth projections and demographic trends, and describes existing development within the Planning Area, including adopted and proposed specific plans. Together, this information establishes the baseline conditions and planning history that guide land use decisions.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 7
Existing 2006 General Plan
2006 General Plan Boundaries
The existing Rancho Cordova General Plan was adopted in 2006 and establishes land use designations for areas within the 2006 General Plan Planning Area, which includes both city limits and over 40,000 acres of surrounding unincorporated lands in Sacramento County. These unincorporated areas
were identified as locations where the city had an interest in guiding development decisions and were envisioned as
potential areas for future city expansion.

Planning Areas vs. Land Use Designations
The 2006 General Plan includes 16 individual Planning Areas covering areas both within and outside city limits, as shown on Figure 4. The Land Use Element contains conceptual land use plans for each of these Planning Areas rather than specific land use designations for each parcel. The parcels within the remaining areas are each assigned a specific land use
designation, with low-density residential, medium-density residential, parks and open space, and office mixed-use being the predominant designations.

With recent changes in State law, it is important that every parcel of land within city limits has an assigned land use designation. This is one of the goals of this land use
alternatives process, which is discussed more in the next section of this report.

Smart Growth Principles
The 2006 General Plan prioritizes Smart Growth principles to enhance quality of life. It proposes developing neighborhoods, villages, districts, and centers with mixed land uses,
walkability, transportation options, and preserved open space.

These "building blocks", illustrated below in Figure 3, are aimed at creating compact, sustainable, and livable
communities through interconnected residential, commercial, and natural spaces. The building blocks concept has guided the land use patterns of the new growth areas within the city, as the specific plans adopted for these areas have
incorporated smart growth principles.

The city is proposing to retain these smart growth principles in the 2050 General Plan, and one of the goals of this land use alternatives process is to find ways to retrofit the older commercial corridors, employment centers, and
neighborhoods to better reflect smart growth principles.

FIGURE 3: BUILDING BLOCKS OF THE CITY
ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 8
FIGURE 4: 2006 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM

Source: City of Rancho Cordova and Ascent, 2024.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 9
Specific Plan Development Capacity
Significant growth is anticipated within specific plan areas both inside and outside city limits. Within the city limits, there are six specific plans or master plans, shown in Figure 5, that are either adopted or in process. While specific plans are required to be consistent with the General Plan, the specific plans contain the more detailed land use designations and development standards that apply to these areas. Land use alternatives in this report focus on changes to “infill areas” within the city limits. As shown in Table 1, the specific plans within city limits have remaining capacity for over 38,000 housing units and over 7.4 million square feet of non-residential development. Additionally, as shown in Figure 5, there are seven specific plans or master plans controlled by the County within the broader General Plan Planning Area that have capacity for over 41,000 housing units.

TABLE 1. REMAINING DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY WITHIN CITY SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS Specific Plan Residential Units Remaining Non-Residential Square Footage Remaining Single Family Multifamily Commercial Office Industrial
Westborough at Easton
Specific Plan (in process) 4,100 3,000 - - -
Legado (in process) 4,200 800 - - -
Rio Del Oro Specific Plan 9,000 3,000 2,398,000 1,181,000 2,430,000 Sunridge Specific Plan 8,200 1,200 245,000 - -
Suncreek Specific Plan 2,600 1,400 1,189,000 - -
The Ranch 800 200 32,000 - -
Total 28,900 9,600 3,864,000 1,181,000 2,430,000 Notes: The capacity numbers are estimates as of 2025. Some of these estimates are subject to change as plans that are in process are still being finalized or updated. Non-residential square footage is estimated based on non-residential acreages.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 10
FIGURE 5: CITY AND COUNTY SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 11
Growth Projections
When updating the land use plan, cities typically start by estimating future population and job growth. They need to ensure there's enough land to accommodate that growth.

However, the City of Rancho Cordova is in a different
situation. Because the city has large amounts of vacant land within city limits, the usual question – "Do we have enough land?" – isn't the main concern. As demonstrated below, Rancho Cordova already has sufficient land designated for new housing and jobs by 2050 – the horizon year of the
General Plan. This means the city can focus on a different question: "What mix of housing, jobs, and amenities will create the vibrant, connected city we want?"
Population Projections
To account for the uncertainty of various factors influencing future population growth in the city, a low-growth scenario and a high-growth scenario were developed for the period of 2020 to 2050. The projections show that the city may add between 30,000 to 40,000 residents by 2050, resulting in a 2050 population of about 109,000 to 119,000 residents.

FIGURE 6: POPULATION PROJECTIONS, 2020-2050

Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS), 2025.

Job Projections
Sacramento County employment is projected to grow at
approximately 0.6 percent annually from 2025 to 2050,
adding roughly 131,000 jobs countywide—a slower pace than historical growth. Based on SACOG projections, the city's share of county growth, and historical trends, Rancho
Cordova is estimated to add between 14,000 to 24,000 jobs by 2050, reaching a total employment base of 78,000 to
88,000 jobs. While the city's job growth averaged over 2 percent annually from 2010 to 2020, future growth is
expected to be below 1 percent per year. The low-growth scenario projects 0.8 percent annual growth (about 600 jobs per year), while the high-growth scenario assumes 1.3 percent annual growth (nearly 1,000 jobs per year).

FIGURE 7: EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS, 2025-2050

High Growth

0.8%
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS), 2025.

1.3%
24,000
Low Growth
14,000
ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 12
Housing Unit Projections
Between 2013 and 2024, the city issued a total of 6,496 building permits for new housing units. This equates to an annual average of 541 new housing units per year. This
included a record year in 2024 when the city issued 1,309 permits. During this period, multifamily units in buildings with five or more units comprised 11 percent of the total permitted units, while single-family units accounted for the remaining 89 percent.

FIGURE 8: HOUSING UNITS PERMITTED BY YEAR, RANCHO
CORDOVA 2013-2024

If housing continues to be built at this same rate, it is anticipated that the city might add 14,000 new housing units by 2050, the horizon year of the General Plan. At this same average rate, the city’s specific plan areas alone would have capacity to accommodate new housing growth through about 2080.

FIGURE 9: HOUSING UNIT PROJECTIONS VS. CAPACITY IN

SPECIFIC PLANS
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 2085 2095
+14,000 units
projected by 2050
+38,500 capacity
in city specific

Existing Housing Stock ~ 32,000
City specific plans have enough
remaining capacity for housing growth
through 2095 (based on the 10-year average of
541 units/year)
2024 2013
ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 13
Environmental Constraints
Environmental constraints are an important consideration in land use planning to ensure that new development occurs in safe locations and protects natural resources. Rancho
Cordova must carefully consider hazards such as flooding, wildfire risk, airport safety zones, protected habitat areas, and other environmental issues when determining where and how growth should occur. Most of the infill areas that are the focus of the land use alternatives—including commercial centers, office parks, and corridors like Folsom Boulevard—are already developed and are not as impacted by environmental hazards.

Environmental constraints have a greater impact on
undeveloped areas at the city's edges. These areas are
addressed through specific plans that include mitigation measures and development standards to ensure safe and
sustainable growth.

Flooding
While most of the city is outside of floodplains, flooding is a threat to some areas of Rancho Cordova, particularly along the northern boundary near the American River. Around 5 percent of the city is within the 1 percent annual chance floodplains (aka 100-year flood zones), with additional localized flooding due to undersized drainage systems.

Wildfire Severity Zones
Rancho Cordova faces relatively low direct wildfire risk in most developed areas, with the primary concerns being
wildland-urban interface areas near the American River
Parkway and in some developments with large wetland
preserves containing natural vegetation. Cal Fire's fire hazard severity maps place portions of Rancho Cordova in the
moderate and high hazard zones, but there are no areas in the city in the very high fire hazard severity zones.

FIGURE 10: FLOOD HAZARDS

FIGURE 11: WILDFIRE THREAT

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 14
Airport Hazards
Mather Airport is located just outside city limits. The Mather Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) places
restrictions on development to maintain compatibility
between Mather Airport and surrounding land uses,
protecting the airport from incompatible developments and minimizing noise and safety risks for nearby populations. The ALUCP establishes six safety zones that set limits on allowed uses, densities, intensities, and lot coverage. However, Zone 6 is the zone that covers the largest area within city limits. This zone places the fewest restrictions on land uses, with no limits on density; however, it does places a few conditions on uses such as assembly facilities, care facilities, schools, and certain industrial uses.

FIGURE 12: AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ZONES

Habitat Preservation
The South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan (SSHCP), approved by Sacramento County in 2018, takes a regional approach to protect federal and state endangered and
threatened species while streamlining the development
permitting process in areas planned for growth (i.e., Urban Development Area). The SSHCP covers 317,000 acres in south Sacramento County, Rancho Cordova, and Galt. The SSHCP is a consolidated effort to protect and enhance wetlands
(primarily vernal pools), aquatic habitats, and upland habitats for 28 special-status plant and animal species, including 10 state and federally listed species. Development projects within the Urban Development Area must either preserve
habitat or pay mitigation fees to offset any habitat impacted by development.

FIGURE 13: VERNAL POOLS

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 15

3. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES
This section of the report describes the three land use alternatives developed for community feedback. It starts with a discussion of the land use designations used in the alternatives and then identifies the defining features of each alternative.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 16
Overview
Each alternative presents various concepts that represent different options for the future in Rancho Cordova, addressing goals for housing, jobs, entertainment options, and gatherings places within bikeable/walkable neighborhoods and districts.

While the alternatives vary in the extent and distribution of land uses, they all focus on the following objectives, which are reflected in the Planning Strategies later in this section:
• Removing barriers to infill development to encourage new development and reinvestment in older parts of Rancho
Cordova;
• Allowing flexibility for new uses in office parks to
encourage them to adapt to changing trends;
• Promoting a wider variety of housing types along
commercial corridors, in office parks, and in transit-rich areas to meet housing needs and invigorate these areas
with new residents;
• Creating more neighborhood and community gathering
places and dynamic entertainment options for residents
and visitors from the region.

Key Terms Used in this Section
• Infill Development. New development on vacant or
underused sites within already-built areas, such as
redeveloping old shopping centers.
• Specific Plan. A detailed planning document for a specific area that provides more precise land use rules than the General Plan.
• Mixed-Use. Development that combines different uses—such as housing, retail, and offices—in one building or area, allowing people to live, work, and shop nearby.
• Density. The number of housing units allowed per acre of land.

ALTERNATIVE A
Focuses on creating a new
dynamic City Center as the
heart of Rancho Cordova and is
the most flexible in removing
barriers to development in other
infill areas of the city.

ALTERNATIVE B
Focuses on multiple centers of activity
throughout the city rather than one City
Center, with more flexibility for infill
development compared to the Base
Alternative but slightly more restrictions
than Alternative A.

BASE ALTERNATIVE
Slightly modified version of the land
use plan from the City’s existing 2006
General Plan. This alternative assigns
land use designations to all parcels
within Planning Areas inside city limits,
based on the conceptual land use
plans in the 2006 General Plan.

THE THREE ALTERNATIVES ARE GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

The Preferred Alternative can mix and match
pieces of the three alternatives and/or add new
ideas from the community or decision-makers.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 17
Land Use Designations
General Plan land use designations specify the type of future development allowed on each parcel of land in the city (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial) and how dense or intense that development can be, meaning the number of housing
units per acre (units/acre) or the size of buildings. These designations are not the same as zoning. Zoning sets more detailed development rules, such as allowed uses, setbacks, and building heights. However, zoning must be consistent with the General Plan land use designations.

Table 2 includes descriptions of the land use designations used in the three land use alternatives. Most of these
designations come from the existing 2006 General Plan and continue in all three alternatives. However, some of the existing designations have been modified and others have been replaced with new designations, as described below.

How is Density and Intensity Measured?
Residential Density measures how many homes are allowed on a piece of land. It's expressed as units per acre
(units/acre). For example, a density of 10 units/acre means you could build 10 homes on one acre of land. This could be 10 single-family homes on small lots or 10 apartment units on a one-acre lot.

Higher density numbers allow more homes on the same
amount of land, which typically means smaller lots or multi- family housing like apartments or condos.

The diagram below shows various building configurations representing different density ranges. Standards of population density can be determined based on an assumption of
persons per household.

FIGURE 14: CONCEPTUAL DIAGRAM OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY
ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 18
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is used to regulate the intensity of nonresidential and mixed-use development. It's a measure of building size compared to the size of the lot, calculated by dividing the total building floor area by the lot area.

For example, a FAR of 1.0 means a building could be one story covering the entire lot, or two stories covering half the lot. A FAR of 2.0 allows twice as much building space—like a two- story building covering the entire lot, or a four-story building covering half the lot.

Higher FAR numbers allow taller or larger buildings on the same size lot.

FIGURE 15: CONCEPTUAL DIAGRAM OF FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) Figure 15: Conceptual Diagram of Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 19
TABLE 2: LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTIONS DENSITY/INTENSITY General Agriculture (GA)
Lands within the General Agriculture category are set aside for commercial-level agricultural production. Sites for General Agriculture are considered economically viable for farming operations.

N/A
Urban Agriculture (UA) – NEW
The Urban Agriculture designation allows for small-scale agricultural operations that include crop production, animal raising, beekeeping, market gardens, community gardens, and produce stands in a form and at a scale appropriate for the urban context of Rancho Cordova.

N/A
Estate Residential (ER)
The Estate Residential category is characterized by larger, “executive”-style homes on generous lots. It allows a smooth transition between the rural areas of the city and the more intensively developed neighborhoods.

0.51-2 units/acre
Low Density Residential (LDR)
The Low Density Residential designation represents the traditional single-family neighborhood with a majority of single-family detached homes. This is the predominant land use designation of the city’s neighborhoods.

2.1-6 units/acre
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
The Medium Density Residential designation allows for small lot single-family detached, single-family attached (e.g., town homes, condominiums, brownstones), and small apartment complexes.

6.1-20 units/acre
High Density Residential (HDR)
The High Density Residential designation allows for development of larger multi-family housing complexes, including apartments and condominiums.
20-40 units/acre
Residential Mixed-Use (RMU)
The Residential Mixed-Use designation allows for commercial or office uses to be co-located on the same property, either vertically or horizontally, with residential development at medium to high densities. It does not preclude residential development within the designation but rather encourages a mixing of uses.

6.1-40 units/acre
FAR: 1.5 Max

General Agriculture is removed from the land use
designations in Alternatives A and B because there are no lands within the city for large-scale, commercial
agriculture.

Urban Agriculture is a new designation in Alternatives A and B to allow for community gardens and other urban-
scale agriculture appropriate within city limits.

The maximum density for Medium Density Residential is
increased from 18 to 20 units/acre across all alternatives to better align with density limits in State Housing
Element law.

The minimum density for High Density Residential is
changed from 18.1 to 20 units/acre across all alternatives to better align with density limits in State Housing
Element law.

What’s Changing in the Alternatives?
ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 20
TABLE 2: LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTIONS DENSITY/INTENSITY Commercial Mixed-Use (CMU)
The Commercial Mixed-Use designation encourages the integration of retail and service commercial uses with office and/or residential uses. In mixed-use projects, commercial use is the predominant use on the ground floor; however, standalone residential is allowed with active ground floor uses.

Base Alternative

2.1-18 units/acre
FAR: 0.25-1.5
Alternative A + B
10-30 units/acre
FAR: 0.25-1.5
General Commercial (GC) - NEW
The General Commercial designation allows for a broad range of commercial uses, including retail, personal services, restaurants, and entertainment uses.

Alternative B
FAR: 0.25 - 1.0

Transit Corridor Mixed-Use (TCMU) - NEW
The Transit Corridor Mixed-Use designation is intended to activate the Folsom Boulevard corridor with transit-oriented development.

This designation provides for high density residential and a broad range of commercial uses, including retail, services, restaurants, hotels, and offices. Uses may be either freestanding or co-located on the same property, either vertically or horizontally integrated.

Alternative A
10-40 units/acre
FAR: 0.25-2.0
Alternative B
20-60 units/acre
FAR: 0.5-2.5
Village Center (VC)
The Village Center designation meets daily shopping needs for residents in a village as described in the building blocks concept.

Typical uses include small- to medium-sized grocery stores, drug stores, dry cleaners, and coffee shops. This designation also allows housing as part of a mixed-use commercial center. Development is pedestrian friendly with neighborhood gathering places.

Base Alternative + A

6.1-18 units/acre
FAR: 0.25-1.0
Alternative B
18-30 units/acre
FAR: 0.25-1.0
Local Town Center (LTC) / Community Activity Center (CAC) The Local Town Center designation provides retail, restaurant, and entertainment uses within a district as described in the building block concept. Typical uses include a combination of retail, restaurant, office, and residential. This designation may also include large retail stores, lodging, entertainment, public/quasi-public, and indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. Development is pedestrian friendly with gathering places for both daytime and nighttime activities.

Base Alternative + A

6.1-18 units/acre
FAR: 0.3-1.5
Alternative B
18-40 units/acre
FAR: 0.3-1.5
Regional Town Center (RTC)
The Regional Town Center designation is generally characterized by a horizontal or vertical mix of integrated retail, office, and residential uses that serve both the entire City and the region. Large retail stores, restaurants, public/quasi-public uses, and entertainment venues are common. Regional activity centers are vibrant destination places for the entire region and foster an active nightlife.

6.1-40 units/acre
FAR: 0.35-4.0
The density range for Commercial Mixed-Use is increased to 10-30 units/acre and standalone residential is allowed in Alternatives A and B to facilitate infill housing.

General Commercial is a new designation used in
Alternative B on parcels where the city might want to
consider allowing only commercial uses.

Local Town Center is renamed “Community Activity
Center” in Alternatives A and B and the density range is increased to 18-40 units/acre in Alternative B to allow for a greater variety of housing types.

Regional Town Center is renamed “Regional Activity
Center” and is only used in one of the city’s specific plan areas. It does not appear in the land use alternatives.

The density range for Village Center is increased to 18- 30 units/acre in Alternative B to allow for a greater
variety of housing types.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 21
TABLE 2: LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTIONS DENSITY/INTENSITY City Center (CC) - NEW
The City Center is envisioned to become the vibrant core of Rancho Cordova, where commerce, culture, entertainment, and government converge. This designation allows for the densest concentration of retail, restaurants, entertainment, personal services, hotels, civic uses, multifamily housing, and employment in a pedestrian-oriented environment. Uses may be either freestanding or co-located on the same property, either vertically or horizontally integrated.

Alternative A
30-100 units/acre
FAR: 0.5-5.0

Entertainment Mixed-Use District (EMUD) - NEW
The Entertainment Mixed-Use District designation is intended to establish an area in the city specifically for the development of a large-scale entertainment center with related and supporting uses including retail, restaurants, hotels, and multifamily housing. The district is intended to be a special place in the city that is entertaining, vibrant, and inviting to tourists, visitors, and residents alike.

Alternative B
20-80 units/acre
FAR: 0.35-4.0

Office Mixed-Use (OMU)
The Office Mixed-Use designation encourages the integration of commercial and/or residential use in conjunction with office use of a site. Office uses are the predominant use, but others may be included in a vertical or horizontal configuration.

Base Alternative

2.1 – 18 units/acre
FAR: 0.25-1.5

Innovation Mixed-Use (IMU) - NEW
The Innovation Mixed-Use designation provides for professional offices and innovative businesses in an amenity-rich environment that integrates employment with commercial and residential. This designation allows for a variety of businesses and professional offices with supporting services, retail, and multifamily housing. Uses may be either freestanding or co-located on the same property, either vertically or horizontally integrated. Existing industrial uses may remain and expansions with clean industrial uses are allowed; however, new industrial uses shall be limited to those with a low environmental impact to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential.

Alternative A
20-40 units/acre
FAR: 0.25 - 3.0

Alternative B
20-80 units/acre
FAR: 0.25 - 3.0

Advanced Industrial (AI) - NEW
The Advanced Industrial designation encourages the growth of creative and innovative industries and businesses. The designation allows for professional office, research and development, incubator spaces, light industrial uses with low environmental impacts, and supportive retail and commercial development.

Alternative B
FAR: 0.25 - 3.0

City Center is a new designation in Alternative A that
replaces the Convention Overlay with a larger City
Center at the intersection of Sunrise and Folsom
Boulevards

Entertainment Mixed-Use District is a new designation
in Alternative B that replaces the Convention Overlay
with an entertainment district.

Innovation Mixed-Use replaces Office Mixed-use in
Alternatives A and B. This designation allows for
increased density and FAR to encourage innovative
new residential, commercial, and employment uses
within the city’s office parks.

In Alternative B, Advanced Industrial replaces some
areas designated Office Mixed-Use to reserve areas
within the city’s office parks for employment uses only, ensuring land use reserved for new and expanding
industries.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 22

TABLE 2: LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTIONS DENSITY/INTENSITY Light Industrial (LI)
The Light Industrial designation allows industrial or manufacturing activities that occur entirely within an enclosed building. This designation also includes warehousing activities or distribution centers but excludes corporation yards. Employee intensive operations (e.g., research and development) that would otherwise not occur within the Office Mixed-Use designation are permitted. The designation also allows hospitals and other public/quasi-public uses.

FAR: 1.0 Max

Heavy Industrial (HI)
The Heavy Industrial designation allows for industrial or manufacturing activities that may occur inside or outside of a building or structure. This designation includes corporation yards and surface mining and related operations.

FAR: 0.6 Max

Public/Quasi-Public (QP)
The Public/Quasi-Public designation allows for uses including civic buildings; schools, colleges, and universities; religious institutions; hospitals; museums; cemeteries; and others. Most buildings in this designation are high profile and prominent within the community. To meet future community needs, new development projects should include public/quasi-public sites for future, undetermined uses.

FAR: 0.1-1.0
Parks and Open Space (OS)
The Parks and Open Space designation allows for both active and passive recreational activities, such as parks, lakes, golf courses, and trails.

N/A

Natural Resources (NR)
The Natural Resources designation sets aside land as natural habitat that typically has no urban development on it. Often, open space trails will be sited adjacent to Natural Resource areas.

N/A

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 23

TABLE 2: LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTIONS (CONT.)
Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay
The Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay applies within one- quarter mile of light rail stations. The purpose of the TOD Overlay is to promote and provide for higher density and intensity uses as part of or in proximity to transit stations. The objective of locating more intensive uses near transit stations is to promote transit services along major transit corridors of the city.

Base Alternative
18-80 units/acre
FAR: 0.5-2.5
Alternative A
20-80 units/acre
FAR: 0.5-3.0
Alternative B
20-100 units/acre
FAR: 0.5-3.0
Convention Overlay (CO)
The Convention Overlay applies to an area around Sunrise Boulevard and Folsom Boulevard. It allows higher densities and intensities and modifies the uses allowed by the underlying land use designations to support a convention center district, including hotels, restaurants, and meeting spaces. Retail, office, and higher-density residential uses are permitted if they support the convention center. The Convention Overlay area is also a prime location for a performing arts or entertainment complex.

Base Alternative
10-40 units/acre
FAR: 0.25-3.0

Downtown Planning Area (DPA)
The Downtown Planning Area (DPA) is envisioned in the 2006 General Plan as the heart of Rancho Cordova - a vibrant place to live, work, play, and shop. The DPA acts as an overlay, allowing higher intensities (i.e., FAR) and height than what is allowed in the underlying designations.

Base Alternative
No change to
underlying density
FAR: 0.25-3.0

What is an Overlay?
An overlay designation is a special set of rules placed over existing land use designations to add extra
requirements or standards. It modifies or adds to the
existing land use rules, allowing specific uses or
development that may not be permitted in the base
designation. For example, the Transit-Oriented
Development (TOD) Overlay is placed over various land
use designations on parcels within one-quarter mile of
transit stops, including Commercial Mixed-Use, Office
Mixed-Use, and other designations, and allows for
increased density, intensity, and height beyond what
would otherwise be allowed in those designations.

FIGURE 16: OVERLAY
The Downtown Planning Area is only
reflected in the Base Alternative.

Alternative A shifts the focus to the
City Center at Sunrise and Folsom, and
Alternative B focuses on multiple
centers of activity rather than a
downtown.

The Convention Overlay is replaced by
the City Center designation in
Alternative A and Entertainment Mixed-
Use District in Alternative B.

The Land Use Alternatives propose
modified densities for the TOD
Overlay, increasing to 20-80
units/acre in Alternative A and 20-100
units/acre in Alternative B, with a
maximum FAR of 3.0 in both
alternatives. The boundaries of the
TOD Overlay have been modified in all
three alternatives to snap to parcel
lines and exclude single-family parcels.

ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1

Land Use Alternatives Report | February 2026 24
Senate Bill 79 and Transit-Oriented Development
Senate Bill (SB) 79 is a State law that allows for higher- density housing development within one-half mile of transit stops. Beginning July 1, 2026, land zoned for residential, commercial, or mixed-use near transit stops may be eligible for increased development standards. These standards vary based on transit type and proximity, with greater densities allowed closer to higher-capacity, more frequent transit.

In Rancho Cordova, parcels surrounding Mather Field/Mills, Zinfandel, Cordova Town Center, Sunrise, Hazel, and the planned Horn Road light rail stations are eligible for SB 79.

Parcels of land within one-quarter mile of a light rail station may develop up to 65 feet in height, 100 units/acre, and a 3.0 FAR, while parcels located within one-half mile may develop up to 55 feet, 80 units/acre, and a 2.5 FAR.

The city’s Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay, as proposed in the land use alternatives, is a locally-tailored zoning tool that directs higher-density development to select areas within one-quarter mile of light rail stations, while generally excluding existing single-family neighborhoods. In contrast, SB 79 establishes a statewide, one-size-fits-all framework intended to broadly increase housing capacity near transit within a larger half-mile area. Under SB 79, development projects must provide a minimum percentage of affordable housing, comply with anti-displacement measures, and meet other eligibility criteria that do not apply to projects utilizing the city’s TOD Overlay.

While the TOD Overlay and SB 79 allow comparable densities within one-quarter mile of light rail stations, the State law is more expansive in the area that is eligible for increased density. In practice, however, development under either framework remains concentrated along the Folsom Boulevard corridor. Both the TOD Overlay and SB 79 support the vision for transit-oriented development around light rail stations, with the state law potentially enabling additional housing capacity across a wider area.

SB 79 allows jurisdictions to exempt certain sites or adopt TOD alternative plans. However, the alternative plans must allow the same total net zoned capacity and must comply with other rules that are fairly restrictive. The State has not yet provided guidance on SB 79 implementation.
½ Mile Radius ¼ Mile Radius
FIGURE 17: SB 79 ELIGIBLE AREAS
ITEM 12.2.

ATTACHMENT 1