9 1
2 7
7 Some input received from stakeholders that were addressed in the development code included suggestions for lower guest parking requirements, allowing for shared parking between uses in mixed use areas and flexibility in design for accommodating parking as well as recommendations for future development of parking management plans. In addition, stakeholders requested clear process requirements and objective standards that provide more certainty in desired outcome and streamlining in development review, and more flexibility in certain lot and site planning requirements without having to do a zone change or code amendment.
Planning Commission
On April 13, 2022, the Planning Commission held a study session on the Public Review Draft of the Development Code and subsequently on April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed amendments. Three minor edits were also presented to the Commission to be included in the recommendation. These include: 1) removing height limits from the CE2 zone to allow for flexibility in vertical development; 2) elimination of height limit for high rise building type; and 3) Changing the zoning on APN 0209-032-35 from Neo Industrial to Center 1. No public comments were received at either meeting and the Commission unanimously recommended adoption of all proposed amendments.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
In approving the General Plan update in December 2021, the City Council certified the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City has reviewed the proposed Development Code Update against the General Plan EIR and determined the EIR adequately addresses all the environmental issues associated with the project. The proposed project would not result in any new significant impacts on the environment based upon the analysis and conclusions presented in the General Plan EIR. In addition, previously identified significant impacts would not be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR. Finally, no new feasible mitigation measures have been identified that would substantially reduce significant impacts identified in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, staff has prepared an EIR Addendum for the Development Code Update. Unlike an EIR, an Addendum is not required to be circulated for public review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The adoption of these new interim standards will facilitate future development consistent with the vision outlined in the General Plan. The General Plan vision for denser, mixed use urban centers can help Rancho Cucamonga maintain a high level of fiscal performance and become a regional destination and focal point of activity.
COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
These amendments address multiple City Council Core Values, including providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all, promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and intentionally embracing and anticipating the future, building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, and more.
Furthermore, these ordinances support the City Council’s goal of completing the General Plan and Housing Element.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, April 27, 2022 Attachment 2 – Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-14 Attachment 3 – Ordinance No 1000
Attachment 4 – Ordinance No 1001
Attachment 5 – Ordinance No 1002
Attachment 6 – Resolution No 2022-055
Historic Preservation Commission and
Planning Commission Agenda
April 27, 2022
MINUTES
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
7:00 p.m.
The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on April 27, 2022. The meeting was called to order by Chair Dopp 7:00 p.m.
A. Roll Call
Planning Commission present: Chair Dopp, Commissioner Morales, Commissioner Boling and Commissioner Daniels; Commissioner Williams.
Staff Present: Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Matt Burris, AICP, LEED AP, Deputy City Manager-Community Development, Interim Planning Director; Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; David F. Eoff IV, Senior Planner; Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Darleen Cervera, Executive Assistant; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.
B. Public Communications
Chair Dopp opened public communications and hearing no one, closed public communications.
Chair Dopp announced a change in the agenda order: Following Consent Calendar, Public Hearing Item D2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2022-00053 - PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS will be heard before D1. Design Review DRC2021-00120 WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC.
C. Consent Calendar
C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 13, 2022.
Motion to adopt by Commissioner Boiling, second by Commissioner Daniels. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 vote.
D. Public Hearing
D2. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST OF DAYTON DRIVE AND BUFFALO AVENUE – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2022-00053 - PARAMOUNT LOGISTICS - A request to operate an 85,026 square foot Warehouse, Storage, and Distribution (Medium) land use in the Neo Industrial (NI) District at 11601 Dayton Drive; APN: 0229-262-09. The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – operation, permitting, leasing, or minor alteration of existing structures.
Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file).
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Chair Dopp opened public hearing.
Chuck Buquet, Applicant, thanked Commissioners for their consideration this evening.
Chair Dopp closed public hearing.
Commissioner Boling expressed appreciation for the applicant’s usage of this property that would otherwise be an underutilized building within the city. It adds or keeps jobs within the city and has the necessary infrastructure for trucks going in and out. He said staff did their due diligence in determining the operations would be relative similar in nature.
Motion by Vice Chair Williams; Second motion by Commissioner Boling. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Adopt proposed Resolution 22-13 (CUP DRC2022-00053).
D1. LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE - WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC - A request to establish a Master Plan and construct a mixed-use development comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space within the Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -39. (Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074).
Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file).
Brian Jacobson, Applicant, discussed the intent and envision for the project. Relating to Condition of Approval, Planning Condition #2, a letter was emailed today requesting it to be significantly revised and replaced with similar condition applied to the Alta Cuvee project approved at the last Commission meeting (Letter on file).
Commissioner Daniels asked if they have a phasing plan yet.
Brian Jacobson responded they are still analyzing what will come first.
Commissioner Daniels asked what kind of timeframe is there in first phase/walk ups.
Brian Jacobson answered they hope to start project 1-year from now.
Commissioner Morales asked if they had problems leasing out commercial units to retail tenants at other projects.
Brian Jacobson responded this is our first project constructed of this type. Have not had anything like this before. He said they reached out to broker community to find out what are the challenges to get tenants to commit if they cannot see what they are getting. The condition, as written, it creates timing problems. The timing problems impact the revenue flow. He said if we were confident, we could get the type of marquee commercial tenants that we want for this project to build that space and get them in first. That is exactly what we would do but we really want the best quality commercial tenants possible. Everyone has said you have to get the project substantially complete before getting a marquee tenant interested to lease.
Commissioner Morales asked about the parking structure. Will it be visible from the street level from cars or pedestrians on Foothill.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Brian Jacobson answered when you are directly adjacent driving on Foothill and Milliken the residential public facing part of the building blocks the structure entirely. Although, if you get far enough down the road, you can see a portion of the parking structure peeking out above the roof line at the residential building. He said staff has placed a condition on the project as it proceeds through construction and if there still concerns about visibility of top of parking structure, staff can ask to screen it through different methods.
Vice Chair Williams mentioned the design of the different floors of the parking garage and asked to explain how resident would get inside.
Brain Jacobson explained the wrap design benefit gives the ability for someone who has an apartment on the 3rd floor, they can park on the 3rd floor of the structure with direct access to the third floor of the building.
He said this is designed that every unit will have a least one of their assigned parking spaces on the level they live on.
Vice Chair Williams asked will there be along Foothill a bus bay and an area where Uber and Lyft people can wait comfortably where it is safe and well lit.
Brian Jacobson yes, there is a bus bay on Foothill and that will remain. Ultimately down the road, it may change a little bit, depending on how transit evolves in the city.
Vice Chair Williams asked about bikeability. Is there bike sharing, bike paths.
Brian Jacobson answered they will have a rent a bike program.
Commissioner Boling asked can you explain or reconcile your description of a marquee quality tenant. The ones shown on the plans, such as a nail salon, do not seem like marquee tenants.
Brian Jacobson replied the purpose of the diagram was to illustrate the allowable uses within the spaces.
Commissioner Boling asked to provide examples or categories of tenants.
Brian Jacobson answered they are not at liberty to say.
Commissioner Boling asked would it be fair to categorize the type of tenant you are seeking be known as a national or regional brand.
Brian Jacobson responded yes, it would be a fair categorization.
Chair Dopp asked what an acceptable condition is. He said keep in mind we want to make sure all the pieces are moving together at the same time in terms of the project being successful.
Brian Jacobson replied the condition that was applied to Alta Cuvee would be great.
Commissioner Williams asked what was the Alta Cuvee condition.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Brian Jacobson read aloud to the greatest extent feasible, the applicant and developer shall lease the two- ground floor commercial spaces on the project to uses/business that encourage public interaction and attendance. Uses that encourage public interaction and attendance include but are not limited to cafes, restaurants, bakeries, sandwich shops, etc. Uses that are limited in their ability to attract the public and activate the space in front of the building are discouraged. These uses include barber shops, salons, dental offices, accountants, etc.
Chair Dopp asked if there is consideration to add docking stations for electrical vehicles on the project.
Brian Jacobson answered yes. He said all the enclosed garages are pre-wired for electrical vehicle charging and garages who have direct access from their unit, they have charging outlets already installed. There will also be pre-planning electrical vehicles in the parking garage.
Chair Dopp expressed he likes the roof lounge. Asked what kind of experience and deign do they have to activate that space.
Brian Jacobson mentioned they have not built this type of building before. Their roof decks exist on free standing club houses where they have 2-story version of club houses. There are decks on the roof of the ground floor. He said their best example is at the Homecoming at the Resort. It has a 2-story clubhouse and on 2nd floor has a lounge, sort of gathering, great room experience opens an outdoor deck. That deck has a view to the south overlooking the pool and north to the mountain.
Chair Dopp opened public hearing.
Noah Garrison, Lozeau Drury, representing Supporters Alliance for Environs Responsibility (“SAFER”), requested denial of the project, stating It does not meet CEQA requirements. He said it requires proper EIR due to having significant environmental effect.
Brian Jacobson mentioned they did review the letter received this afternoon by Lozeau Drury. Their attorney prepared a written response explaining comments are inaccurate.
Chair Dopp closed public hearing.
Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney, explained the CEQA process utilized for this project. He also reviewed the letter by Lozeau Drury, and it did not provide any new substantial evidence that there was a significant impact that had not been previously analyzed. He is comfortable saying you can move forward tonight.
Chair Dopp asked, is it fair to say just because we do a General Plan EIR means it does not qualify for future projects.
Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney, stated if that were the case, CEQA guideline would say that, and it does not say that. It says we can rely on that prior EIR if the projects densities are consistent with the densities in the General Plan. If that were the case, the guidelines would be of no use to anyone.
Commissioner Morales asked staff to explain the COA and why it was put in there. How we had problems in the past with developers finishing the project. Why do you think its important we have a strict COA like that for such a big project.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Matthew Burris, Deputy City Manager, explained we did have problems with developers finishing in the past.
We can identify a handful of sites within the city. He provided examples; Office and Hotel project on Fourth and Haven that has a pad for retail building. Hotel has been built for years with no activity on the pad area.
D.R. Horton site Baseline/Day Creek had similar conditions for that project. We did run up against a situation where D.R. Horton did not want to move forward with the non-residential component. Due to Covid, we had to make adjustments to the conditions to help push forward.
Commissioner Boling asked to clarify is the concern that the retail components won’t be built within a timely manner or is it occupied and therefore sales tax revenue starts coming off of it.
Matthew Burris, Deputy City Manager, replied it’s a two-stage concern. Certainly, we want to see it get built.
Ideally get built and get a tenant.
Commissioner Boling asked what staff’s true concern is. In his mind, the core issue is what incentive is there to assure the retail component gets built and once it gets built how do we help the developer get marquee quality tenants.
Chair Dopp stated we are new to mixed-use. What are we seeing in other cities in terms of the timeline. He asked are retail lacking far behind.
Matthew Burris stated the retail market is complicated post Covid. Rancho Cucamonga tends to have a very, very healthy retail market. Far more in our retail city than most comparable cities. Yes, there is a demand, no doubt to fill space.
Chair Dopp asked is it staffs position not necessary sacrificing quality if we keep this condition in place.
Matthew Burris answered yes, that would be our position on the condition. It is a legitimate concern, Vice Chair Williams stated if we require them to get basic space ready for a tenant but if you force them before they take occupancy, they will get whatever they can get. There is no question, they will fill. She said we want as high quality as we can get. Does not think we need to require them to have tenants in place before they take occupancy.
Commissioner Morales mentioned near downtown L.A. on Broadway, there are mixed-use buildings and most of those buildings are commercial units on bottom are empty. There are metal frames, looks ugly. Is that something that could potentially happen with this project. Infrastructure exposed.
Matthew Burris replied yes. It is a concern that led to the writing of the language in the condition presented this evening.
Commissioner Daniels stated he agrees with the developer. He also understands Morales’ comments. It seems more of that wrap building getting built it is going to occur with that retail there. He said he will not have difficulty changing that modification.
Matthew Burris mentioned one of the things that came out of the General Plan project is that Milliken is designed as an arterial. In that case to have retail on a fast street, we felt a lot more comfortable to have retail on Foothill be more comfortable and have support retail.
Commissioner Morales stated the applicant had good points on Condition #2 and the City had good points of concern. Is there any kind of compromise.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Nicholas Ghirelli suggested the following alternative language for the condition: Occupancy for the walk-up product shall be limited to 65 percent (212 units) until a building permit is obtained by the developer and construction has commenced on the wrap building. Subsequently, occupancy for the walk-up product shall be limited to 80 percent (294 units) until the wrap building has been issued a building permit and is under construction.
Commissioner Boling stated having the language sends right message.
Commissioner Morales expressed that he likes the history of pumpkin patch being included in the art, the placement of fruit trees and the farmhouse theme architecture. Likes the Harvest brand, fits in perfect with pumpkin patch and fruit trees. He is in favor of the project with the condition described by the City Attorney.
Commissioner Daniels appreciates how much work staff put into this project and expressed he likes the project . Architecture is different from the other cities.
Commissioner Boling concurs with the comments from his fellow Commissioners. It is well put together project. It ties in with City Council vision having walkable neighborhood. It was a community asset pumpkin patch that a lot of people are going to miss. He hopes the company has reached out to find an alternative location for them.
Vice Chair Williams expressed she likes the style of the wrap building. It is a unique addition to the city. She expressed she wants to attend a party on the rooftop deck.
Commissioner Dopp expressed the attractiveness of this quality project brings. Lewis has brought a great project to the city. A lot of due diligence into what we want and what we are looking for in terms of quality development that brings multiple things to our community. Although, he is not a huge fan of the farmhouse, he likes the unique things in the farmhouse like wood paneling especially along the street. It’s really attractive.
Planning Commission really has a clear vision of what we are looking for to connect key arterials and meet some of our housing needs as well. This project has walkability, connectivity to the rest of the community.
All of this matches well with what we are trying to do in this part of town. He commends Lewis for being patient with us and putting in the effort to try to match the vision specifically of the General Plan.
Motion by Vice Chair Williams; Second motion by Commissioner Boling. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Adopt proposed Resolution 22-13 Conditional Use Permit with the revisions to Planning Condition #2.
D3. Consideration of a Recommendation to the City Council to Adopt a Comprehensive revision to Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, adopt a Revised Zoning Map and Repeal or Amend Several Specific Plans, Planned Communities and Master Plans to Implement the Goals and Policies of the General Plan. This Item Will be Forwarded to City Council for Final Action.
Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file).
Chair Dopp opened public hearing and seeing no one, closed public hearing.
Chair Dopp asked what we are looking at when it comes to mixed-use. We have a couple of metrics in the form-based code. What is the thinking behind residential to non-residential uses and the approach we are looking at.
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, explained the concept of mixed-use. There were many Commissioners prior who felt a mixed-use development should be a mix of uses. Evaluated many areas and ultimately, at this point it is best to calibrate those right now to project and that is where those numbers came into the form-based code. Where there is an actual defined residential to non- residential numbers.
Chair Dopp mentioned 9th and Archibald and asked is it possible we would see some residential on that block.
Jennifer Nakamura replied, it would be highly likely to see a mixed-use development there.
Vice Chair Williams reiterated will be revisiting in approximately 5-6 months. As was demonstrated to us immediately, there were some specifics that just got overlooked, etc. She appreciates the fact can be open to a whole lot more interpretation between now and whenever we come back. She hopes from now on going forward maybe every 6 months or so, it needs to be given another look at with a lot of revision. This is a very important document.
Jennifer Nakamura responded with the rate the state is changing legislation and types of business and types of uses that maybe we did not consider. It is a practice we take very seriously. It’s important that If we see something wrong, we fix it.
Vice Chair Williams commented Jennifer did a good job.
Commissioner Daniels expressed his thanks to staff. It’s very unusual with the adoption of a new code you will find changes and revisions that is needed. The form-based code is very exciting and unique.
Commissioner Morales expressed his thanks for bringing it to the Commission. Now we have to put the pedal to the metal so developers can get to work.
Commissioner Boling appreciates the work staff put in on this. Having a premier developer within the city here tonight and not having them stay or comment on this, it’s a testament to Staff’s ability to work with the development community. It speaks volumes.
Jennifer Nakamura mentioned they did have a meeting with our premier developers ahead of the Planning Commission meeting this evening. They had a majority of their questions answered.
Chair Dopp mentioned he is shocked the level of discussion on the development code. This is a very important moving document of what we want the city to look like. The fact that there is not much discussion or debate on the big things we are seeing is really a testament to you, Matt and staff.
Motion by Vice Chair Williams; Second motion by Commissioner Boling. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Adopt proposed Resolution 22-14 Title 17 Development Code.
D. Director Announcements
HPC/PC MINUTES – April 27, 2022
Matthew Burris mentioned that Rancho will be hosting the Cal Cities Planning Commission training in August.
Also, the General Plan is getting an award from the Inland Empire American Planning Association.
F. Commission Announcements - None
G. Adjournment
Motion by Vice Chair Williams, second by Commissioner Morales to adjourn the meeting, motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 9:38 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Elizabeth Thornhill
Executive Assistant, Planning Department
Approved:
ORDINANCE NO.1000
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MUNICIPAL
CODE AMENDMENT ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE
TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM
TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
1. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above ref erenced Municipal Code Amendment adopting a comprehensive update to the Development Code and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-14, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt the p roposed Municipal Code Amendment.
2. On May 18, 2022 , the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Municipal Code Amendment.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on May 18, 2022, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. T he City adopted its last comprehensive update to Development Code in 2010, and has since updated and amended individual sections of that code; and b. The City desires to adopt a comprehensive update to the Development Code in order to (i) reflect the goals, policies, and implementation measures of the City’s updated General Plan, adopted in December 2021; (ii) ensure compliance with applicable Federal and State legislation; (iii) incorporate form -based zoning regulations for walkable mixed- use development; (iv) incorporat e appropriate standards from older Specific Plan and Planned Communities to allow for the repeal of outdated plans ; (v) add new objective design standards for multi -family and mixed- use development projects ; and (vi) clarify Code content, address existing deficiencies, and improve usability; and
c. The City has prepared a comprehensive update to the City’s Development Code that implements the policies of the General Plan, which was updated in 2021. The City made the Public Draft Development Code Update (“Public Draft”) available for public review o n April 7, 2022. The Public Draft is a comprehensive revision and update of Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code that sets requirements for private development of property,
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
including development standards, permitted uses, building heights, building setbacks, parking standards, sign standards, landscaping requirements, subdivisions, animal keeping regulations, and other development-related topics.
SECTION 3 : The City has prepared an Addendum (the “Addendum”) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021050261) (the “Final EIR”) prepared for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, attached hereto as Attachment B to this Ordinance, which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the proposed Municipal Code Amendment were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that neither a subsequent EIR, a supplemental EIR, n or a negative declaration is required f or environmental review of the proposed Municipal Code Amendment. The City Council finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq. , and the C ity’s local CEQA guidelines (collectively “CEQA”) based also on the following specific findings and determinations:
a. On December 15, 20 21, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution Number 2021-132, adopting environmental findings pursuant to CEQA for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, certifying the Final EIR, adopting a statement of overriding considerations, and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The General Plan Update specifically contemplated revisions to and a comprehensive update of the Development Code such as is accomplished by the proposed Municipal Code Amendment and the Final EIR analyzed the impacts thereof.
b. The proposed Municipal Code Amendment does not propose substantial changes to the City’s development regulations that were not analyzed in the Final EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The proposed Municipal Code Amendment simply implements the goals and policies adopted in the City’s updated General Plan and analyzed in the Final EIR. c. There have been no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed Municipal Code Amendment is being undertaken that were not contemplated in the Final EIR or that will require major revisions of the Final EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Final EIR addressed the impacts of adopting the City’s updated General Plan, and rev isions to the development code and was certified on December 15, 2021. Since adoption of the updated General Plan in 20 21, the City has not processed any amendments to the Plan. As a result, there are no substantial changes to the environment which would require a modification of the Final EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
d. There is no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified that shows (a) the proposed Municipal Code Amendment will have any significant effects not discussed in the Final EIR; (b) the significant effects examined in the Final EIR will be substantially more severe than previously shown; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
previously found to be infeasible would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed Municipal Code Amendment ; or (d) considerably different mitigation measures or alternatives than those analyzed in the Final EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment are now available.
The City Council, exercising its independent judgment after considering the administrative record, hereby adopts the Addendum to the certified Final EIR, attached hereto as Attachment B, reaffirms the findings adopted as part of the Final EIR certification and set forth in Resolution No. 2021-132 as remaining applicable to the proposed Municipal Code Amendment.
The custodian of records for the Addendum, documents and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision is based, including, but are not limited to, the staff reports for the proposed Municipal Code Amendment, all of the materials that comprise and support the Addendum to the certified F inal E IR and all of the materials that support the staff reports for the proposed Municipal Code Amendment, is the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
SECTION 4 : Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby adopts the proposed Municipal Code Amendment adopting a comp rehensive update to the Development Code, as set forth in Attachment A attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference. The Municipal Code Amendment set forth in Attachment A replaces, in its entirety, the provisions of the City's existing Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Municipal Code.
SECTION 5: The provisions of this Ordinance, insofar as they are substantially the same as provisions of ordinances previously adopted by the City relating to the same matter, shall be construed as restatements and continuations of the earlier enactment, and not as new enactments.
SECTION 6: The adoption of this Ordinance does not affect the following matters:
a. Actions and proceedings that began before the effective date of this Ordinance.
b. Prosecution for ordinance violations committed before the effective date of this Ordinance.
c. Licenses and penalties due and unpaid at the effective date of this Ordinance.
d. Collection of licenses and penalties due and unpaid at the effective date of this Ordinance.
e. Bonds and cash deposits required to be posted, filed, or deposited pursuant to any ordinance, resolution, or regulation.
f. Matters of record that refer to or are connected with an ordinance previously adopted by the City the substance of which is amended by this Ordinance. Such references shall be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions of this Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
SECTION 7: Any provision of the previously existing Title 17 (“Development Code”) of the Municipal Code not included in the Municipal Code Amendment enacted by this Ordinance is hereby repealed.
SECTION 8: Nothing in this Ordinance shall in any manner modify or otherwise affect the following subject matters:
a. The corporate or jurisdictional limits of the City.
b. Contracts to which the City is a party.
c. City taxes.
d. City franchises.
e. Highways, roads, streets or other public right-of-way.
f. Bonds or indebtedness of the City.
g. A district, public corporation or other entity established by the City.
h. Specific public improvements or assessments.
i. Appropriation or investment of City funds.
SECTION 9: The Council hereby directs the City Clerk to make all necessary, non- substantive conforming revisions to the Municipal Code necessary to codify this Ordinance , including, but not limited, to clerical corrections to section numbers, table and figure re ferences, and cross references.
SECTION 10: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the re maining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 11: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law.
___________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
ATTEST: ___________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 18th day of May, 2022, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on ____________, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Attachment A – Development Code Amendment
The Public Review Draft of the Development Code is available online for review at:
Public Review Draft Development Code (Title 17)
ORDINANCE NO. 1000
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Attachment B – EIR Addendum
March 2022 | General Plan EIR Addendum
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR
SCH No. 2021050261
FOR THE
INTERIM DEVELOPMENT CODE/ZONING
STANDARDS
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Prepared for:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Contact: Jennifer Nakamura
Deputy Director of Planning
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
909.477.2700
Prepared by:
PlaceWorks
Contact: Mark Teague, AICP, Managing Principal
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, California 92707
714.966.9220
[email protected]
www.placeworks.com
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Table of Contents
March 2022 Page i
Section Page
1. ADDENDUM TO THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN EIR ............................................................... 3
1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 PURPOSE OF AN EIR ADDENDUM ........................................................................................................... 3
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................. 5
1.4 GENERAL PLAN EIR ........................................................................................................................................ 9
2. CEQA ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 1
2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Tables Page
TABLE 1 SPECIFIC PLANS AND MASTER PLANS REVISED OR REPEALED WITH ZONING CODE UPDATE ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 TABLE 2 TABLE 2. GENERAL PLAN MODIFY EXISTING ZONING .............................................................. 9
Figures Page
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Table of Contents
Page ii March 2022
This page intentionally left blank.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
1. Addendum to the Certified General Plan EIR
1.1 PURPOSE
This document serves as the environmental documentation for adoption of the Interim Development Code (project, proposed project) and Zoning Map to be in compliance with the General Plan. This document is an addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), certified on December 15, 2021 (State Clearinghouse Number 2021050261), which demonstrates that the analysis in the General Plan EIR adequately addresses the potential physical impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project and that none of the conditions described in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15162, exist and preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not necessary.
1.2 BACKGROUND
On December 15, 2021, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council certified the environmental impact report and adopted the updated General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City). The General Plan is the City’s blueprint, or constitution, for future development. The General Plan documents the City’s long-range vision and established clear goals, objectives, and actions to guide the community through the next 20 years.
While the General Plan is the policy document that provides an overall vision, policy direction, and implementation strategy to support future development in Rancho Cucamonga, the development code implements general plan policies through detailed development regulations, such as specific use types and building standards. Although the purpose and intent of zoning is different from the General Plan, State law requires that zoning be consistent with maps and policies in the General Plan. Uses and densities/intensities are permitted if they are consistent with both the General Plan land use designation and the zoning of the property. When a zoning ordinance becomes inconsistent due to a general plan amendment, the city must enact a consistent zoning ordinance within a reasonable time.
The current development code is not consistent with the intent of the character-based General Plan Land Use Designations and does not contain the necessary standards to implement the General Plan vision for walkable, mixed-use places. As a result, proposed Interim Development Code is designed to implement the Land Use Designations in the General Plan, including the addition of form-based code components for the new mixed- use place types established in the General Plan. As the City is under development pressure to implement the newly adopted General Plan, t he adoption of the Interim Development Code as an urgency ordinance will allow the City to begin implementing the General Plan immediately.
1.3 Purpose of an EIR Addendum
According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a), an addendum shall be prepared if some changes or additions to a previously certified EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions enumerated in CEQA Guidelines
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) calling for the preparation of subsequent EIR have occurred. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations):
When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously foun d not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed project would not trigger any of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) because these changes would not result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects r equiring major revisions to the General Plan EIR. The following analysis provides the substantial evidence required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) to support the finding that a subsequent EIR is not required and an addendum to the General Plan EIR is the appropriate environmental document to address changes to the project.
As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR):
(a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or addi tions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 5
(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary o r none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. (c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration.
(d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. (e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.
A copy of this a ddendum, and all supporting documentation, may be reviewed or obtained at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
1.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is to adopt an Interim Development Code to implement the Land Use Designation in the General Plan as an urgency ordinance. The Interim Development Code contains provisions to ensure that land development is consistent with the policy direction of the General Plan. As the current Development Code was comprehensively updated in 2012, the recommendations included in the proposed project include amendments to standards and requirements within the existing structure and format of the Code (Development Code Update City of Rancho Cucamonga, page 3). These recommendations include topics such as General Plan Implementation and General Code Issues, Mixed-Use and Multi-Family Objective Design Standards, and Specific Plan and Master Plan Analysis. The fundamental elements of the Development Code update are:
• Integrating and modifying the form-based and conventional zones. • New form-based zoning regulations for walkable mixed-use areas along Foothill Boulevard and other key corridors.
• Incorporation of appropriate standards from older Specific Plans and Planned Communities into the new zoning regulations to allow for repeal of outdated plans. • New objective design standards for multi -family residential and mixed -use development projects to respond to changes in state law and facilitate housing production. • Improved administration and permit procedures to streamline development review for projects consistent with the General Plan and ensure adequate tools for enforcement of the Development Code.
The implementation of the General Plan is generally managed by the Development Code (Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code). The Development Code includes zoning districts consistent with the General Plan and applies development standards to each zoning district that guide site layout, key design elements, and development intensity. The proposed project also includes objective design standards for mixed used and multi-family development as form-based elements that will be applied to base zoning districts.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
As shown below in Table 1. Specific Plans and Master Plans Revised or Replaces with Interim Zoning Code Update and referenced in the General Plan EIR (Land Use and Planning, page 5.11-16), several of the existing plans in the city would be reappealed and changed to comply with the n ew standards of the Interim Development Code Update.
Table 1. Specific Plans and Master Plans Revised or Repealed with Interim Zoning Code Update Plan/Year Adopted or Amended Notes on Review
Empire Lakes Specific Plan (ELSP) (Also
referred to as IASP Sub -Area 18 Specific
Plan) 1994 adopted/2016 last revised
Amend the ELSP boundary to cover area as required by the Development Agreement, with those regulations, requirements, and standards remaining in place.
The remaining ELSP areas will be regulated by policy and standards in the General Plan Update. Areas regulated by the General Plan Update will be implemented with the citywide code (including new form-based districts, and design standards).
Etiwanda Highlands Planned Unit
Development (EH) 1988
Repeal – Develop two new zone districts (e.g., VL - EH 9000 and VL -EH 14000) to regulate this area, consistent with the standards in the existing Planned Unit Development (PUD). Standards not regulated by the PUD would be regulated in the new zone districts. All other standards and procedures applicable to the VL District would apply to the VL-EH Districts.
Etiwanda North Specific Plan (NESP) 1992 Repeal – A portion of this Plan area was amended and now regulated by the Etiwanda Heights Specific Plan. The portion identified for low density residential can be regulated by the existing Low Residential District standards. The remaining area will be regulated by the Traditional Neighborhood Land Use Designation and subsequent zoning district and the zoning that replaces the Etiwanda Highlands Planned Unit Development (see above).
Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) 1985
adopted/2000 last revised
Repeal – A small area will be regulated by the new form-based zoning district based on General Plan placetype. Regulate the Very Low density area with the existing Very Low Residential District. Create new zone districts to regulate the remaining areas consistent with the standards in the Specific Plan.
Terra Vista Community Plan (TCVP) 1983
adopted/1995 last revised
Repeal – The Plan Area along Foothill Boulevard will be regulated by the new form - based zoning district based on the General Plan Update.
The remaining area is a combination of Low Medium , Medium, Medium High, and High zoning districts. Create new zone districts to regulate the remaining areas consistent with the standards in the TCVP .
Town Square Master Plan (TS) 2002 Repeal – This area to be regulated by policy and standards in the General Plan Areas regulated by the General Plan will be implemented with the citywide code (including new form-based districts, and design standards, as applicable).
Victoria Arbors Master Plan (VA) 2002 See VCP below. Victoria Arbors Master Plan overlaps with the VCP .
Victoria Community Plan (VCP) 1981 Repeal – A portion will be regulated by the applicable new form-based zoning district based on General Plan placetype. For the remainder, the existing Low and Low Medium Residential zoning districts will be applied based on the designation in the VCP . The Mixed Use overlay will also be deleted as part of this effort.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 7
The Interim Development Code update includes modifications to existing zoning districts as well as new zoning districts with form-based code components. Table 2, General Plan Modifying Existing Zoning Districts, displays the following recommended zoning districts to implement each of the General Plan land use designations and if modifications or new zoning districts are needed (Interim Development Code Update, 5). Recommendations to implement the General Plan and create new zones to implement the new mixed -use land use designations are provided in Section 2.B of the Interim Development code update (Interim Development Code update, 5).
Other changes to existing zoning districts may be reco mmended based on an assessment of General Plan policies in Appendix A of the Interim Development Code update. Appendix A is used to identify inconsistencies between the General Plan and the City’s Development Code and provide recommendations to resolve those inconsistencies (Interim Development Code Update, A-1).
The Interim Development Code will facilitate development in zoned properties and bring them into compliance with the General Plan. While zoning districts will change, the development potential and impacts are already addressed in the General Plan EIR. In most cases, there are development standards for any new permitted use that would not be subject to CEQA review. However, development policies, programs, ordinances, and permits that define the development process would still apply.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Table 2. General Plan Modify Existing Zoning
General Plan Land
Use Designation
Implementing Zone Recommendation
Neighborhood Place Type
Semi-Rural
Neighborhood
Very Low Residential (VL) Modify to allow multi -family, civic and neighborhood serving commercial consistent with
General Plan
Traditional
Neighborhood
TBD Discuss with City the possibility of modification of EHNCP Zones to apply Requires additional
microscale analysis in residential areas
Suburban
Neighborhood –
Very Low
Low (L) and/or Low Medium
Residential (LM)
Modify maximum allowed density consistent with
General Plan consistent with General Plan
Suburban
Neighborhood-
Moderate
High Residential (H) Modify to ensure limited neighborhood commercial uses allowed consistent with General Plan
Urban
Neighborhood
FBC: Urban Center New Zone consistent with General Plan Corridor Place Type
Neighborhood
Corridor
FBC: Neighborhood General New Zone consistent with General Plan City Corridor -
Moderate
FBC: General Urban New Zone consistent with General Plan City Corridor – High FBC: Urban Corridor New Zone consistent with General Plan District Place Type
21st Century
Employment
District
FBC: General Urban New Zone consistent with General Plan Office Employment
District
Office Professional (OP) and
or Commercial Office (CO)
combination
Modify to allow mixed use, multi -family, increase
height/density, and reduce setbacks consistent with
General Plan
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 9
1.5 GENERAL PLAN EIR
The General Plan EIR found that, with the implementation of policies and actions from the General Plan and mitigation measures identified in the EIR, there would be less than significant impacts related to aesthetics, energy, geology and soils, hazardous materials, hydrology/water qualit y, land use/planning, mineral resources, population/housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, utilities and se rvices, and wildfire. As the proposed project is intended to align the Development Code and Zoning map with the General Pla n, implementation of policies and actions from the General Plan and mitigation measures identified in the EIR would have the same mitigating effect under the Interim Development Code and impacts would also be less than significant.
Table 3 lists the significant and unavoidable impact determinations of the General Plan EIR and compares the resulting impacts of the proposed project to those determinations. The General Plan EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to agriculture/forest resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation. As described below, the proposed project would be within the scope of analysis of the General Plan update identified in the EIR. The proposed project would incorporate all applicable General Plan policies and implementation measures for significant and unavoidable impacts identified in Table 3 and would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.
Table 3: General Plan EIR Significant and Unavoidable Impacts and Impacts of the Proposed Project Environmental Topic Significant and Unavoidable Impact Determination Resulting Impact of the Proposed Project Agriculture and Forest Resources Impact 5.2 -1: The proposed project would convert Farmland to non - agricultural uses but would not result in the conversion of forest land to non-forest uses. [Thresholds AG-1 and AG-5]
The proposed project would not allow development of land that was not considered for development under the General Plan. While current vineyards and orchards would be converted into urban uses as part of future anticipated development, they would not impact land not considered for development in the General Plan EIR. There proposed project would not have an effect in forest lands because there are no lands that qualify as forest or timberland.
Air Quality Impact 5.3-2: The proposed project would cause construction-generated criteria air pollutant or precursor emissions to exceed South Coast AQMD-recommended thresholds. [Threshold AQ-2]
Impact 5.3-3: The proposed project would result in a net increase in long- term operational criteria air pollutant and precurs or emissions that exceed South Coast AQMD -recommended thresholds. [Threshold AQ- 2]
Impact 5.3-5: The proposed project would expose sensitive receptors to substantial increases in toxic air contaminant emissions. [Threshold AQ- 3]
The General Plan Update would accommodate future development of single -family and low -rise multifamily residential, retail, hotel, office, art/entertainment/recreation, and industrial land uses. The proposed project would not change the type of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
The future development and other physical changes that could result from implementation of the Interim Development Code would generate construction- related emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors. The proposed project would not change the type of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementati on of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
The implementation of the Interim Development Code could result in exposure of sensitive receptors due to construction-related TAC. However, the proposed project would not change the type of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
Environmental Topic Significant and Unavoidable Impact Determination Resulting Impact of the Proposed Project Biological Resources Impact 5.4 -1: Buildout of the proposed Land Use Plan would impact sensitive plant and animal species known to occur in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. [Threshold B-1]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could impact special status vegetation or special status wildlife in the city. However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts ass ociated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Cultural Resources Impact 5.5-1: Buildout of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan could impact historic resources. [Thresholds C-1]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could adversely impact some of these historic resources. However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 5.8 -4: The proposed project would be inconsistent with the State’s ability to achieve the long- term reduction goals or Executive Orders S-3-05, B-30-15, and B-55-18. [Threshold GHG-2]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could result in the generation of greenhouse gases .
However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Noise Impact 5.13-1: Construction activities would result in temporary noise increases in the vicinity of the future development under the General Plan. [Threshold N-1]
Impact 5.13 -2: Project implementation could generate a substantial permanent increase in traffic noise levels at noise-sensitive land uses in excess local standards. [Threshold N-2]
Impact 5.13-4: Expose new sensitive land uses to noise levels in excess of the noise compatibility standards identified in 2040 General Plan Noise Element Table N-1. [Threshold N-4]
Impact 5.13- 5: Future development under the General Plan could generate short-term construction vibration or exposure to new sensitive land uses to long- term operational vibration sources that exceed City thresholds. [Threshold N-5]
The City has established standards for acceptable noise levels in Section 17.66.050 that are consistent with the Development Code update. Because the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and noise impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Traffic noise modeling was conducted for existing (2021) and future (2040) conditions using traffic data generated for the 2040 General Plan, which was based on anticipated land use development contemplated under buildout conditions through 2040. Because the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and noise impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
New development associated with the 2040 General Plan could potentially be near existing roadways and existing or future planned railroads. Because the proposed project wou ld not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and noise impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Implementation of standard condi tions of approval 5.13 -5b and 5.13- 5c, which require project -specific vibration analyses to evaluate vibration exposure from nearby transit sources and evaluation of potential vibration impacts from new transit projects would still be required under the Interim Development Code.
Therefore, noise impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
March 2022 Page 11
Environmental Topic Significant and Unavoidable Impact Determination Resulting Impact of the Proposed Project Transportation Impact 5.17-2: The project may be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) regarding policies to reduce VMT. [Threshold B-2]
Implementation of the Interim Development Code could result in changes to the vehicle miles traveled by residential and non-residential development in the City. However, the proposed project would not change the type or location of development assumed in the General Plan EIR and VMT -related impacts associated with implementation of the Interim Development Code would be the same as that analyzed in the General Plan EIR
..
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
March 2022 Page 14
2. CEQA Analysis
2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The General Plan contains policies related to land use and community character, focus areas, open space, mobility and access, housing, public facilities and services, resource conservation, safety , and noise. As previously described in Section 1.4 and referenced in Table 3, the General Plan EIR addresses potentially significant impacts related to agriculture and forestry, air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation. The policies of the General Plan and the existing development standards apply to all development in the General Plan and would continue to apply to the land that is the subject of the proposed project.
The proposed zoning changes are intended to align the City’s Municipal Code and Zoning Map with the land use designations and policies and implementation measures with the General Plan and will replace or amend specific plans and master plans previously adopted. Therefore, these changes would not result in significant changes to the existing land uses and or development standards as compared to that analysis in the General Plan EIR. The modification to the specific and ma ster plans in the General Plan EIR is consistent with the specific design standards and guidelines in the Development Code upda te (Development Code Update, Appendix-H).
The General Plan EIR anticipates growth in focused areas of the community that are already designated for development (Project Description, 3-2). The Land Use & Community Character in Section 5.11 Land Use and Planning details policy changes for different place types. These focus areas will increase housing and building intensity as well as create more urban spaces (Land Use and Planning, 5-11-7). The General Plan EIR suggests Volume 4 Implementation Strategy recommends policy change in the development code changes. (Project Description, 3-3)
Chapter 3, Project Description of the General Plan EIR, considers anticipated growth for existing and proposed General Plan Designation as listed in Table 2. General Plan Modify Existing Zoning. The Land Use Designations listed in Table 3-2 Existing and Proposed Land Use Designations of the General Plan EIR display density ranges for mix of existing land use designations that will comprise the new place type; these density ranges are consistent with the recommendations listed in proposed Interim Development Code update (Project Description, 3-6).
2.2 FINDINGS
The discussion in this addendum confirms that the proposed project has been evaluated for significant impacts pursuant to CEQA.
There are no substantial changes in the circumstances or new information that was not known and could not have been known at the time of the certification of the General Plan EIR. As a result, and for the reasons explained in this addendum, the project would not cause any new significant environmental impacts or substantially increase the severity of significant environmental impa cts disclosed in the General Plan EIR. Thus, the proposed project does not trigger any of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Addendum to the Adopted General Plan EIR
requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR, and the appropriate environmental document as authorized by CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) is an addendum. Accordingly, this EIR addendum has been prepared.
The following identifies the standards in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 as they relate to the project.
1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project which would require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
The proposed project will align the new zoning districts as shown in the Interim Development Code update with the l and use designations including the addition of form- based code components and mixed-use place type descriptions assumed in the General Plan EIR . The proposed changes are consistent with the General Plan as evaluated in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the updates to the Development code would not change the conclusions of the EIR and would not require revisions to the General Plan EIR due to new significant environmental effects or a substa ntial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
2. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR.
The policies and implementation measures identified in the General Plan EIR would continue to apply to all development in the city and would have the same effect to reduce or eliminate environmental impacts as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The amendments to the Development Code were discussed in the General Plan EIR, and there is nothing in the proposed project that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan EIR was certified demonstrating that the project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR. Therefore, no new impacts would occur because of future development. Because a development project must be consistent with the General Plan, zoning, and development standards of the City, the resulting impacts would be the same as those disclosed in the certified General Plan EIR.
3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that s ignificant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR.
Implementation of the proposed project would have the same significant impacts as those disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan policies and implementation measures identified in the General Plan EIR to reduce physical environmental effects would apply to all new development. These policies would have the same effect in reducing or eliminating environmental impacts as disclosed in the General Plan EIR . There is no new information that would demonstrate that significant effects examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the certified General Plan EIR.
4. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found
ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THE INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
March 2022 Page 14
not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially r educe one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed project will align the zoning districts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the General Plan Land Use Map as evaluated by the General Plan EIR. All policies and implementation measures identified in the General Plan EIR would continue to apply to all development in the city and would have the same effect in reducing or eliminating environmental impacts as disclosed in the General Plan EIR. The proposed project would not change the assumptions described in the General Plan EIR and, therefore, would not substantially change the conclusions of the EIR or require new mitigation measures.
5. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete demonstrating that m itigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed project changes would not result in an increase of overall development intensity and the resulting impacts would be the same as those disclosed in the certified General Plan EIR. Therefore, no new mitigation measures or alternatives to the proposed project would be required.
ORDINANCE NO.1001
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A REVISED OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP, AND MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA
A. Recitals.
1. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Zoning Map Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-14, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt the proposed Zoning Map Amendment.
2. On May 18, 2022 , the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Zoning Map Amendment.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on May 18, 2022, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. On December 15, 20 21, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution Number 2021-132, updating the City’s General Plan; and b. State law requires that zoning be consistent with maps and policies in the General Plan. Uses and densities/intensities are permitted if they are consistent with both the General Plan land use designation and zoning of the property. When a zoning ordinance becomes inconsistent due to a General Plan amendment, a city must enact a consistent zoning ordinance within a reasonable time; and
c. The City desires to adopt a revised official Zoning Map in order to (i) implement zoning consistent with the place types and general plan designations reflected in the City’s updated General Plan adopted in December 2021; and (ii) ensure compliance with applicable State law; and
d. The City has prepared a revised official Zoning Map that implements the place types and general plan designations of the General Plan, which was updated in 2021 . The City made the Public Draft Development Code Update (“Public Draft”) available for public review in April 7, 2022. The Public Draft is a comprehensive revision to the existing zoning map and all new zones indicated on the revised zoning map are incorporated with development standards in the update of Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code considered concurrently with this zoning map amendment.
ORDINANCE NO. 1001
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
SECTION 3 : The City has prepared an Addendum (the “Addendum”) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021050261) (the “Final EIR”) prepared for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, attached as Attachment B to Ordinance No. 1000 which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the proposed Zoning Map Amendment were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that neither a subsequent EIR , a supplemental EIR, nor a negative declaration is required for the proposed Zoning Map A mendment. The City Council finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City’s local CEQA guidelines (collectively “CEQA”) based also on the following specific findings and determinations:
a. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, reviewed the staff report, accepted and considered public testimony. After due consideration, the Planning Commission found that agencies and interested members of the public were afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 22- 14 recommending that City Council adopt the Addendum.
b. On May 18, 2022, the City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing, considered the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, at which time the City s taff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearings, including the staff report and oral testimony, the City Council, by separate Ordinance No. 1000 adopted on May 18, 2022, adopted the Addendum for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment as set forth in Attachment B to Ordinance No. 1000. c. All actions taken by City have been duly taken in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including CEQA, and all other requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes and other procedural matters.
d. The custodian of records for the Addendum, documents , and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision wa s based, including, without limitation, the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, all of the materials that comprise and support the Addendum to the certified Final EIR and all of the materials that support the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment , is the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
SECTION 4 : Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby adopts the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference as Attachment A, as the City’s official Zoning Map. The official Zoning Map attached as Attachment A replaces, in its entirety, the City's existing official Zoning Map.
SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a
ORDINANCE NO. 1001
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law.
___________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 18th day of May, 2022, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on ____________, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ORDINANCE NO. 1001
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
May 18, 2022
Attachment A – Zoning Map Amendment
The Public Review Draft of the Zoning Map is available online for review at:
Public Review Draft Zoning Map (Title 17)
ORDINANCE NO.1002
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING THE
ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC
PLAN, ETIWANDA HIGHLANDS PLANNED COMMUNITY ,
TERRA V ISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AND VICTORIA
PLANNED COMMUNITY AND AMENDING THE EMPIRE LAKES
SPECIFIC PLAN TO AMEND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PLAN
AND RENAME THE PLAN TO THE RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN ,
AND MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA
A. Recitals.
1. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Zoning Map Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 22 -14, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga repeal of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community, Terra Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community and amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan.
2. On May 18, 2022 , the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed repeal of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community, Terra Vista Planned Community, Victoria Planned Community and proposed amendments to the Empire Lakes Specific Plan.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on May 18, 2022, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. On December 15, 20 21, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution Number 2021-132, updating the City’s General Plan; and b. Special planning areas are geographic areas within the city that have adopted plans with unique use, development, and/or design regulations that vary or deviate from the citywide zoning and development standards. Throughout the United States, special planning areas are created for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to private development applications for master planned communities, protection of unique resources (e.g., historic district, environmental protection), special site considerations (e.g., hillside development, scenic corridors), and/or special use considerations (e.g., targeted use areas, redevelopment opportunities). Since incorporation, special planning areas in the city have been established for all of the above listed reasons. Two such types of special planning areas are Specific Plans and Planned Communities.
ORDINANCE NO. 1002
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
May 18, 2022
c. Over the last 40 years, the City has adopted many specific plans and planned communities, including:
1. Etiwanda Specific Plan – Adopted in 1985
2. Etiwanda North Specific Plan – Adopted in 1992
3. Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community – Adopted in 1988
4. Terra Vista Planned Community – Adopted in 1983
5. Victoria Planned Community – Adopted in 1981
6. Empire Lakes Specific Plan – Adopted in 1994
d. These plans have been amended numerous times since their initial adoption.
Many of these specific plan areas are nearly or completely built out. Because many of the City’s specific plans and planned communities were prepared over 30 years ago, they are difficult to interpret and amendments are often required to accommodate different types of development not contemplated in the 1980s and 1990s.
e. The City desires to repeal these specific plans in order to (i) reduce inconsistencies between these plans and the Development Code and (ii) implement zoning consistent with the place types and general plan designations reflect ed in the City’s updated General Plan, adopted in December 2021; and
f. The City has incorporated applicable standards from these plans in the Development Code to avoid the creation of non-conforming uses and structures; and g. The Empire Lakes Specific Plan is nearly built out, with the exception of the area between 4
th Street and the Metrolink Railroad tracks, bounded immediately to the east and west of The Resort Parkway, previously known as the Empire Lakes Golf Course. h. The City desires to amend the Empire Lakes Specific plan to reduce the boundaries to the area between 4 th Street and the Metrolink Railroad tracks, bounded immediately to the east and west of The Resort Parkway, previously known as the Empire Lakes Golf Course. This portion of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan was amended in 2015 to allow for redevelopment of the Golf Course to allow for housing and some retail uses. The remaining portion of the boundaries of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan would be incorporated into the Development Code.
SECTION 3 : The City has prepared an Addendum (the “Addendum”) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021050261) (the “Final EIR”) prepared for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, attached as Attachment B to Ordinance No. 1000 which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the proposed Zoning Map Amendment were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that neither a subsequent EIR , a supplemental EIR, nor a negative declaration is required for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment. The City Council finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code
ORDINANCE NO. 1002
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
May 18, 2022
of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City’s local CEQA guidelines (collectively “CEQA”) based also on the following specific findings and determinations:
a. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, reviewed the staff report, accepted and considered public testimony. After due consideration, the Planning Commission found that agencies and interested members of the public were afforded ampl e notice and opportunity to comment on the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 22- 14 recommending that City Council adopt the Addendum.
b. On May 18, 2022, the City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing, considered the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, at which time the City staff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearings, including the staff report and oral testimony, the City Council, by separate Ordinance No. 1000 adopted on May 18, 2022, adopted the Addendum for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment as set forth in Attachment B to Ordinance No.1000. c. All actions taken by City have been duly taken in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including CEQA, and all other requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes and other procedural matters.
d. The custodian of records for the Addendum, documents , and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision wa s based, including, without limitation, the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, all of the materials that comprise and support the Addendum to the certified Final EIR and all of the materials that support the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment , is the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
SECTION 4: The City Council hereby repeals the Etiwanda Specific Plan in its entirety.
SECTION 5 : The City Council hereby repeals the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in its entirety.
SECTION 6 : The City Council hereby repeals the Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community in its entirety.
SECTION 7: The City Council hereby repeals the Terra Vista Planned Community in its entirety.
SECTION 8 : The City Council hereby repeals the Victoria Planned Community in its entirety.
SECTION 9 : The City Council hereby amends the Empire Lakes Specific Plan and renames the plan The Resort Specific Plan as shown in Attachment A.
ORDINANCE NO. 1002
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
May 18, 2022
SECTION 10: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the re maining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 11: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
___________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST: ___________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 18th day of May, 2022, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on ____________, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ORDINANCE NO. 1002
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
May 18, 2022
Attachment A – The Resort Specific Plan
The Public Review Draft of the Resort Specific Plan is available online for review at:
Draft Resort Specific Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-055
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING THE TOWN
SQUARE MASTER PLAN AND VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER
PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF CEQA
A. Recitals.
1. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Zoning Map Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 22-14, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga repeal of the Town Square Master Plan and Victoria Arbors Master Plan.
2. On May 18, 2022, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed repeal of the Town Square Master Plan and Victoria Arbors Master Plan.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Fi ndings . Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on May 18, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. Special planning areas are geographic areas within the city that have adopted plans with unique use, development, and/or design regulations that vary or deviate from the citywide zoning and development standards. Throughout the United States, special planning areas are created for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to private development applications for master planned communities, protection of unique resources (e.g., historic district, environmental protection), special site considerations (e.g., hillside development, scenic corridors), and/or special use considerations (e.g., targeted use areas, redevelopment opportunities). Since incorporation, special planning areas in the city have been established for all of the above listed reasons. Two such types of special planning areas are Master Plans . b. Over the last 40 years, the City has adopted many specific plans and planned communities, including:
i. Town Square Master Plan – Adopted in 2002
ii. Victoria Arbors Master Plan – Adopted in 2002
c. These plans have been amended numerous times since their initial adoption.
Many of these specific plan areas are nearly or completely built out. Because many of the City’s specific plans and planned communities were prepared 20 years ago, they are difficult to interpret
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022-055
Master Plan Repeal
May 18, 2021
and amendments are often required to accommodate different types of development not contemplated in the 2000’s
d. The City desires to repeal these specific plans in order to (i) reduce inconsistencies between these plans and the Development Code and (ii) impl ement zoning consistent with the place types and general plan designations reflected in the City’s updated General Plan, adopted in December 2021; and
e. The City has incorporated applicable standards from these plans in the Development Code to avoid the creation of non -conforming uses and structures; and f. The City has prepared an Addendum (the “Addendum”) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2021050261) (the “Final EIR”) prepared for the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, attached as Attachment B to Ordinance No. 1000 which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the proposed Zoning Map Amendment were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that neither a subsequent EIR , a supplemental EIR, nor a negative declaration is required for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment.
The City Council finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City’s local CEQA guidelines (collectively “CEQA”) based also on the following specific findings and determinations:
i. On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, reviewed the staff report, accepted and considered public testimony. After due consideration, the Planning Commission found that agencies and interested members of the public were afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the proposed Z oning Map Amendment and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-14 recommending that City Council adopt the Addendum. ii. On May 18, 2022, the City Council, at a duly noticed public hearing, considered the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum, at which time the City staff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the proposed Zoning Map Amendment and the Addendum . Based upon the evidence presented at the hearings, including the staff report and oral testimony, the City Council, by separate Ordinance No. 1000 adopted on May 18, 2022, adopted the Addendum for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment as set forth in Attachment B to Ordinance No.1000. iii. All actions taken by City have been duly taken in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including CEQA, and all other requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes and other procedural matters . iv. The custodian of records for the Addendum, documents, and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the City Council’s decision was based, including, without limitation, the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, all of the materials that comprise and support the Addendum to the certified Final EIR and all of the materials that support the staff reports for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, is the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2022-055
Master Plan Repeal
May 18, 2021
the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
g. The findings set forth in this Resolution reflect the independent judgment of the City Council.
3. Determination. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution and the totality of the administrative record before it, the City Council hereby repeals the Town Square Master Plan and Victoria Arbors Master Plan.
4. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18th DAY OF MAY 2022.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 18th day of May, 2022, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
DATE:May 18, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Matthew R. Burris, AICP, Deputy City Manager/Interim Planning Director Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Adopt a Resolution to Establish Master Plan DRC2022- 00074 at the Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue - WDCC Milliken West Residential, LLC, Applicant. The Master Plan Will Enable the Construction of a Mixed-Use Development Comprising Of 671 Apartments And 20,841 Square Feet of Commercial Space Within the Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, - 98, -99, 1090-121-38, and -39. (Related Files: Design Review DRC2021- 00120, and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024). A CEQA Section 15183(c) Compliance Memorandum Was Prepared for This Project. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022-049) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve Master Plan DRC2022-00074 with the adoption of Resolution No. 2022-049, allowing the construction of a mixed-use development comprised of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of non-residential space.
BACKGROUND:
On April 27, 2022, the Planning Commission approved Design Review DRC2021-00120 and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024) for Site Plan and Architectural Review of a new mixed- use project comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space. The Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council approve a Master Plan, DRC2022- 00074, which creates specific development regulations for the proposed project and the project site. (Attachment 1)
The project is located on a vacant 17.2-acre site on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. The project will have a proposed density of 39 dwelling units per acre, meeting the density range of 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre required by underlying City Corridor High General Plan Designation.
The project is split into four blocks. The northwest and northeast blocks comprise of 3-story walk- up apartments, while the southwest block contains a clubhouse and pool area. The southeast block contains a four-story “wrap” building, where residential and commercial units wrap around an above-ground parking structure (Attachment 2). All commercial and restaurant space proposed for the project is contained within the Foothill Boulevard frontage of the wrap building along the ground floor. The wrap building “anchors” the project site with great building placement along Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue.
1 2
5 6
All buildings within the project site are designed in a modern interpretation of the classic American farmhouse architectural style. All front facades and building entrances are oriented towards streets and/or sidewalks, helping create a safe and active streetscape. The building placement, appropriate landscape features, and the overall site design creates the feel of an urban, walkable environment as envisioned in the General Plan.
ANALYSIS:
One of the objectives of a Master Plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city to allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zoning district or due to constraints of existing development standards.
The proposed Master Plan (Attachment 3) contains a specific set of development standards which intends to accomplish two objectives: (1) accommodate a highly walkable public realm; and (2) enable a smooth transition of density and development intensity between the project site and the surrounding neighborhood.
The Master Plan accommodates a well-balanced, functional, and highly walkable public realm through the utilization of increased building setbacks in specific areas of the project, primarily along Foothill Boulevard and along Milliken Avenue. The increased setbacks range from 2 feet to 10 feet greater than the maximum setback under the interim Development Standards. However, the increased setbacks are minor in comparison to the overall project and allow flexibility with building placement to provide greater opportunity for wider sidewalk widths and the inclusion of outdoor dining/gathering space to support the ground-floor commercial operations. This also encourages pedestrian activity throughout the project and around the project, particularly along Foothill Boulevard.
Additionally, the Master Plan also allows for the development of 3-story walk-up buildings along the project’s frontage along Church Street, which would otherwise be required to be a minimum of 4 stories through the applicable development standard. However, the 3-story buildings enable a smooth transition of density and development intensity between the 4-story wrap building proposed along Foothill Boulevard and the existing two-story apartments north of Church Street, while still meeting the vision and expectations of the General Plan.
The larger building setbacks and the development of 3-story buildings currently cannot be accommodated through the City’s interim Mixed-Use development standards for the Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District that were applicable at the time this project was deemed complete. Approval of the Master Plan will allow an increase in the maximum setback and a decrease in the minimum structure height, both of which will enable the project to be developed in a unique way that fully meets the vision of the General Plan that is not otherwise possible with the interim development standards.
CEQA DETERMINATION:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s General Plan (GPU) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GPU, the Project site was designated for “City Corridor – High” land uses, which allows for residential development at densities ranging from 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from
0.6 to 1.5. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale.
1 2
5 6
Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards…then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact.” The 17.2-acre property is designated by the City’s General Plan for “City Corridor – High” land uses. The GPU EIR assumed the Project site would be developed with 722 multi-family residential dwelling units and 337,154 square feet of commercial retail land uses. The proposed Project is fully consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor – High” and would be consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required for the proposed project.
To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was prepared by T & B Planning (Exhibit M – CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum). Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the EIR adopted and certified as part of the City’s GPU on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The applicant has submitted a Fiscal Impact Analysis prepared by the Development Planning & Financing Group (DPFG), dated March 29, 2022. The Fiscal Impact Analysis concluded that the project would produce an annual recurring surplus to the General Fund in the amount of $246,000.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
The proposed mixed-use project in conjunction with the proposed master plan achieves the City Council Vision of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all, and also promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. The General Plan envisions Foothill Boulevard to be the City’s mixed-use corridor, featuring a variety of urban developments that will enable vibrant, walkable neighborhoods for residents, businesses, and visitors to enjoy. The proposed mixed-use development fits in this vision by developing a walkable neighborhood containing residential opportunities and a range of commercial/retail opportunities properly arranged around strong circulation and connectivity within the site and to other future developments.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – April 20, 2022 Planning Commission Staff Report with Exhibits Attachment 2 – Project Plans
Attachment 3 – Master Plan DRC2022-00074
Attachment 4 – City Council Resolution No. 2022-049
DATE: April 27, 2022
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Matthew R. Burris, AICP, Deputy City Manager – Community and Economic Development/Interim Planning Director
INITIATED BY: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE - WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC - A request to establish a Master Plan and construct a mixed-use development comprising of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space within the Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District, APNs: 1077-422-51, -55, -98, -99, 1090-121- 38, and -39. (Design Review DRC2021-00120, Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024), and Master Plan DRC2022-00074)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action:
Approve Design Review DRC2021-00120 and Tentative Tract Map 20120 (SUBTT00024) through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Recommend to City Council the approval of Master Plan DRC2022-00074 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request to establish a Master Plan and construct a mixed-use development with 671 apartment units and 20,841 square feet of commercial space on a 17.2-acre site.
BACKGROUND:
The 17.2-acre project site is located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue and is zoned Mixed-Use Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District. The project site covers approximately three-fourths of the city block bordered by Elm Avenue to the west, Milliken Avenue to the east, Church Street to the north, and Foothill Boulevard to the south (Exhibit A - Aerial). The project site is “L” shaped with frontages along Elm Avenue, Church Street, Milliken Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard, interrupted only by an existing shopping center located at the northeast corner of Elm Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The site slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation.
The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Vacant City Corridor High Mixed Use - Urban Corridor (MU-UCR) District North Multifamily Residential Suburban
Neighborhood Moderate Medium High (MH) Residential District 1 South Commercial/Retail Pad
Buildings/Uses
City Corridor High Financial, Restaurants, Residential (MFC) District 1,2
Attachment 1
1 2
2 6
PROJECT ANALYSIS:
A. Overview and Site Layout: The project has a proposed density of 39 dwelling units per acre, meeting the density range of 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre required by the City Corridor High General Plan Designation.
Two interior streets running north to south and east to west split the project into four areas, creating a block network within the site (Exhibit B – Detailed Site and Landscape Plan). A description of what is proposed for each block/quadrant as well as the project’s interior streets are outlined below:
i.) Interior Streets
Two interior streets running north to south and east to west are proposed within the project site. The north-south interior street runs from Church Street and connects to an existing driveway leading to Foothill Boulevard. The east-west interior street runs from Milliken Avenue and connects to an existing driveway leading to Elm Avenue. These interior streets are designed with the look, feel, and function of neighborhood streets to help create an urban environment that is envisioned by the General Plan. The urban environment is enhanced further with proper building placement along the streets, “on-street” angled parking, and appropriate landscape features. The interior streets intersect toward the center of the project, creating a balanced circulation pattern throughout the site. ii.)Northwest and Northeast
These two blocks are primarily comprised of 3-story walk-up apartments with entrances oriented either toward the project boundaries abutting public streets or the interior streets within the site. Stand-alone garages, surface parking areas, and trash enclosures are plotted within the interior of these two blocks, screening these facilities from public view.
iii.) Southwest
A clubhouse, pool, and dog park occupy this block. The clubhouse contains the leasing office, fitness center, and multi-purpose room. The clubhouse building is oriented towards the project’s two interior streets. The southern portion of block abuts a parking area for an existing shopping center. iv.) Southeast
This block contains a four-story “wrap” building, where residential and commercial units wrap around an above-ground parking structure. All 20,841 square feet of commercial and restaurant space proposed for the project is contained within the Foothill Boulevard ground frontage of the wrap building. As such, a small surface parking lot is proposed west of the wrap building, primarily servicing the commercial spaces.
Building entrances are proposed along all four sides of the building for pedestrians, while vehicle entrances to the parking structure are available along the west and north elevation. The wrap building “anchors” the project site with great building placement along Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue.
The wrap building’s setback ranges from 0 feet to 20 feet from the property line along Foothill Boulevard, creating a significant architectural presence at a primary intersection in the city. The setback range also allows opportunity for enhanced sidewalk widths and outdoor dining/gathering space to support the ground-floor commercial and encourage a walkable environment.
B. Architecture: All buildings within the project site are designed in the modern interpretation of the classic American farmhouse. Design elements that reinforce the farmhouse architecture include batten board siding, Shopping Center Industrial Park (IP) District3
Hospital (part) East Vacant (part) City Corridor High Hospital and Related Facilities, Office (MHO) District 1
West Shopping Center City Corridor High Community Commercial (CC) District 1 1 – Terra Vista Planned Community; 2 – north of Foothill Boulevard; 3 – south of Foothill Boulevard
1 2
2 6
corrugated metal awnings, wood railings, sloped roofs, and a primarily white and gray color scheme.
Contemporary architectural elements such as horizontal wood siding, stucco, flat roofs, large windows, and horizontal metal beams are also incorporated into the buildings, giving the farmhouse design a modern appearance. All building materials are carried to all elevations. Horizontal articulation along the building planes as well as vertical articulation on rooflines breaks down the building massing and creates architectural interest (Exhibit C – Elevations, Unit Plans, and Renderings).
The ground floor commercial frontages on the south side of the wrap building (facing Foothill Boulevard) are treated with a variety of architectural elements that blend the farmhouse and modern styles together (Exhibit D – Partial Foothill Elevation). Elements such as corrugated metal awnings and eyebrow canopies placed at different heights and distances from the curb, further enhance the overall architecture by creating visual interest and variation at the storefronts. Additionally, the commercial space is designed with a ceiling height of roughly 16 feet to accommodate a range of commercial uses, as required by the General Plan.
C. Unit Composition and Floor Plans: All residential units will be housed in either 3-story walk-ups on the northeast and northwest portions of the site, or within the 4-story wrap building at the site’s southeast corner.
A total of 323 and 348 units will be located within the 3-story walk-ups and the 4-story wrap building, respectively, with the project providing a grand total of 671 apartments. Studios range in size from 488 to 659 square feet, while 1-bedroom units range from 634 to 1,004 square feet. 2-bedroom units range from 933 to 1,261 square feet. Additionally, 20,841 square feet of ground floor commercial space is located along the 4-story wrap building’s Foothill Boulevard frontage. The table below summarizes the unit composition for both the 3-story walk-ups and the 4-story wrap building.
UNIT SUMMARY
Residential
Unit Type 3-Story Walk-Up 4-Story Wrap Total
-Studio 84 units 33 units 117 units
-1 Bedroom 153 units 194 units 347 units
-2 Bedroom 86 units 121 units 207 units
TOTAL 323 units 348 units 671 units
Commercial
-Commercial (SF) N/A 20,841 20,841
D. Recreation Amenities: The project provides 10 active residential amenities. Resident amenities include two pool/spa areas, an indoor gym, a community multi-purpose room with kitchen, an enclosed dog park with separate areas for small and large dogs, an observation deck, outdoor exercise area, outdoor gaming area, eight BBQ grill areas, and an enclosed children’s play area (Exhibit E – Overall Landscape Plan and Amenity Details).
E. Fencing and Access: Most of the project site is ungated and is therefore publicly accessible by foot or by car. Vehicular entrances and sidewalks to the project’s two interior streets from Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Elm Avenue, and Milliken Avenue are ungated. There are three pedestrian gates/fences that control access to the two clubhouse/pool areas and the fitness courtyard within the wrap building. The only vehicular gate on the property is utilized to separate the upper levels of the wrap building parking structure that is designated for residents from the first story of the parking structure that is primarily dedicated to commercial uses (Exhibit F – Wall and Fence Plan).
F. Master Plan and Proposed Development Standards: One of the objectives of a Master Plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city in order to allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zoning district or due to constraints of
1 2
2 6
existing development standards. The project includes a Master Plan application (Master Plan 2022-00074) which proposes a site-specific set of development standards (Exhibit G – Harvest at Terra Vista Master Plan).
These standards are meant to accommodate a well-balanced, functional, and highly walkable public realm within and around the project. The master plan is also intended to enable the development of two primary building types (3-story walk-ups and the 4-story wrap building). The table below lists the development standards proposed with Master Plan Master Plan 2022-00074.
PROPOSED SITE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Proposed
Density (dwelling units/acre) 36 DU/AC
Front Setback1 - Foothill Boulevard 0’ to 23’
Front Setback1 – Milliken Avenue 12’ to 20’
Front Setback1 – Church Street 15’ to 23’
Front Setback1 – Elm Avenue 10’ to 15’
Front Setback1 - Interior Streets
(Applicable to all building frontages facing interior streets) 5’ to 7’ Interior Setback
(West property line facing adjacent shopping center) 124’ Interior Setback
(South property line facing adjacent shopping center) 56’ Distance Between Buildings Per Building Code
Building Height – Walk-Ups 3 Stories
Building Height – Wrap Building 4 Stories
Landscape Area
(Overall net area) Min. 10%
Open Space Min. 150 SF/unit (100,650 SF)
Parking RCMC Chapter 17.64 (see below)
1 – Measured from Property Line. For interior streets, property line is generally at the inside edge of the adjacent sidewalk (public right-of-way)
G. Walkability: The project provides a complete pedestrian network, with sidewalks provided on both sides of all interior streets and along the project perimeter. Sidewalks along the interior streets are proposed to be 5 feet in width, while sidewalks along the project perimeter adjacent to public streets are 8 to 10 feet wide, allowing adequate space for pedestrian activity (Exhibit H – Walkway Circulation Plan). The proposed pedestrian routes are dotted with linear parks, seating areas, and landscaping, and uninterrupted by blank expanses or parking lots, resulting in an attractive walking environment. All front facades and building entrances are oriented towards streets/sidewalks, helping create a safe and active streetscape.
H. Parking: The project’s master plan is designed to mirror the City’s current parking requirements as described in Section 17.64 of the Development Code. Based on all proposed uses on site, the project is required to provide 1,468 parking stalls, 671 of which are required to be in a garage or carport. Required parking includes tenant and visitor parking for the residential portion of the project, as well as parking for all commercial spaces. The project provides 1,468 parking stalls, 942 of which are covered, meeting the parking requirement (Exhibit I – Parking Plan). In order to ensure that on-site parking is properly managed, the applicant has provided a Parking Management Plan (Exhibit J – Parking Management Plan). This Parking Management Plan outlines how residential, guest, and commercial parking spaces are assigned, and details enforcement actions that apartment management can take in response to any potential parking violations. The following parking analysis table provides a breakdown of the required and provided parking spaces on-site.
PARKING ANALYSIS
1 2
2 6
Number
of Units
Square
Footage Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Multi-Family unit
(studio) 117 N/A 1.3 per unit
(1 in garage or carport) 152
Multi-family unit
(One bedroom) 347 N/A 1.5 per unit
(1 in garage or carport) 521
Multi-family unit
(Two bedrooms) 207 N/A 2 per unit
(1 in garage or carport) 414
Visitor parking 671 N/A 1 per 3 units 224
Commercial (Retail) N/A 8,590 4 per 1000 square feet 34 Commercial
(Restaurant) N/A 12,251 10 per 1000 square feet 123
Total Parking Spaces Required 1,468
Total Parking Spaces Provided 1,468
Total Covered Parking Spaces Required/Provided 671/942
I. Tentative Map: The project includes the subdivision of the project site into four (4) numbered lots for condominium purposes, for the development of 671 apartments and 20,841 square feet of commercial space (Exhibit K – Tentative Map 20120). Each lot will help facilitate construction, circulation, and other components of the project.
J. Public Art: This project is required to provide public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Based on the number of residential units and commercial square footage for this project, the total art value required per Section 17.124.020.C. is $524,091. A condition has been included pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy.
K. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Williams, Morales) on March 15, 2022. The Committee recommended approval of the project to the full Planning Commission.
This is reflected in the in the Design Review Committee Comments (Exhibit L – DRC Minutes dated March 15, 2022).
L. General Plan Consistency: The General Plan designations are centered around four primary components:
Land Use and Development Intensity, Built Form and Character, Access and Connectivity, and Parks and Open Space. The project is located in the Corridor High designation of the General Plan, which is intended to provide for medium to high intensity developments along Foothill Boulevard that include a range of amenities, conveniences, housing options, and more at the edges of many existing and future neighborhoods.
The project has been well-designed to align with the Corridor High designation. The project proposes a density of 39 units per acre, which falls within the expected range of the Corridor High designation of 36-60 units per acre. The proposed site plan includes proper building placement near the sidewalks with proper orientation to exterior or interior streets to accommodate active frontages and ground floor uses. The strategic placement of the buildings forms strong circulation patterns and streetscapes, helping create the desired urban character of the Corridor. The project site also has the benefit of street frontage on four sides and has taken advantage of those frontages to provide easy access and strong connectivity. The site is divided into quadrants, using privately owned streets to create walkable blocks in and throughout the project site. While the streets are privately owned, they will be public accessible and designed to look, feel, and function like public streets, as envisioned by the General Plan.
CEQA DETERMINATION:
1 2
2 6
The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s General Plan (GPU) and certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2021050261) on December 15, 2021. As part of the GPU, the Project site was designated for “City Corridor – High” land uses, which allows for residential development at densities ranging from 36 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and non-residential development at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) ranging from 0.6 to 1.5. According to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project. Use of a Program EIR gives the Lead Agency an opportunity to consider broad policy alternatives and program-wide mitigation measures, as well as greater flexibility to address project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts on a comprehensive scale.
Pursuant to Section 15183(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, “if an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards…then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact.” The 17.2-acre property is designated by the City’s General Plan for “City Corridor – High” land uses. The GPU EIR assumed the Project site would be developed with 722 multi-family residential dwelling units and 337,154 square feet of commercial retail land uses. The proposed Project is fully consistent with the site’s GPU land use designation of “City Corridor – High” and would be consistent with all applicable GPU policies. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required for the proposed project.
To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR or environmental review is required, a CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum dated March 22, 2022, was prepared by T & B Planning (Exhibit M – CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum). Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the EIR adopted and certified as part of the City’s GPU on December 15, 2021. The project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant.
CORRESPONDENCE:
This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no written correspondence, phone calls, or in person inquiries have been received regarding the project notifications.
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:
It is the City Council’s vision to make Foothill Boulevard the City’s mixed-use corridor, featuring a variety of urban developments that will enable a vibrant, walkable neighborhood that residents, workers, and visitors can enjoy.
The proposed mixed-use development fits in this vision by developing a block of this mixed-use corridor.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A - Aerial
Exhibit B - Detailed Site and Landscape Plan
Exhibit C - Elevations, Unit Plans, and Renderings
Exhibit D - Partial Foothill Elevation
Exhibit E - Overall Landscape Plan and Amenity Details
Exhibit F - Wall and Fence Plan
Exhibit G - Harvest at Terra Vista Master Plan
Exhibit H - Walkway Circulation Plan
Exhibit I - Parking Plan
Exhibit J - Parking Management Plan
Exhibit K - Tentative Map 20120
1 2
2 6
Exhibit L - Draft DRC Minutes dated March 15, 2022
Exhibit M - CEQA Section 15183 Compliance Memorandum
Exhibit N - Draft Resolutions of Approval 22-12 TTM Harvest Exhibit O - Draft Resolutions of Approval 22-11 DR Harvest Exhibit P - Draft Resolutions of Approval 22-10 MP Harvest Exhibit Q - Conditions of Approval
Exhibit R - Statement of Agreement
CHURCH STREET
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
ELM STREET
MILLIKEN
AVENUE
600'
600'
600'
600'
600'
BASEPOINT
BASEPOINT
GAR. 01 / A2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
GAR. 03 / B1
BASEPOINT
KP
UP18R
GAR. 03 / B1
BASEPOINT
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/C
BASEPOINT
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
GAR. 06
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
FIRE
RISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
S
S/C
BASEPOINT
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
GAR. 06
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
FIRE
RISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
BASE
POINT
BASE
POINT
GAR. 01 / A2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
GAR. 03 / B1
BASE
POINT
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
GAR. 03 / B1
BASE
POINT
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
BASE
POINT
BASE
POINT
GAR. 01 / A2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
GAR. 03 / B1
BASE
POINT
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
GAR. 03 / B1
BASE
POINT
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
BASEPOINT
BASEPOINT
GAR. 01 / A2
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
GAR. 03 / B1
BASEPOINT
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
GAR. 03 / B1
BASEPOINT
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
222
PRINTER 2 2 2
PRINTER
22 PRINTER
2 2
PRINTER
22 KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KPKP
DUMPSTER
BY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
DUMPSTER
BY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTER
BY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
UP
5' DIA.
5' DIA.
3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 1415
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 UP
30"24
49 30"24 4930"2449
30"24
49 30"2449
30"2449
30"2449
30"
24 49
30"24 49
4.8%
7.2%
30"24
49 30"24 49
08.67 TC08.00 FL
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 10, 2022 17.29 AC. GROSS
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20120
17.29 AC. NET
APN: 1077-422-51,52,54,55 AND 1090-121-28
4 NUMBERED LOTS
(198 UNITS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES)
SITE UTILIZATION MAP SUM-01
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
MADOLE&ASSOCIATES, INC.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HARVEST AT TERRA VISTADATE: JANUARY 10, 2022 JOB NO. 126-2647
CIVIL ENGINEER
OWNER/DEVELOPER
MADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,
PLANNERS AND SURVEYORS
9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
CONTACT: MARK BERTONE
(909) 481-6322 ext. 120
Email: [email protected]
AO ARCHITECTS
144 NORTH ORANGE ST
ORANGE, CA 92866
CONTACT: IOANNA MAGIATI
(714) 639-9860
Email:[email protected]
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE
UPLAND, CA. 91786
CONTACT: BRIAN JACOBSON
(909) 579-1214 OFFICE
Email: [email protected]
ARCHITECT
SITESCAPES, INC.
3190 B-2 AIRPORT LOOP DRIVE
COSTA MESA, CA. 92626
CONTACT: RICK POLHAMUS
(949) 644-9370
Email: [email protected]
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
NTS
VICINITY MAP
MILLIKEN
CHURCH
MAYTEN
PROJECT LOCATION
ELM
FOOTHILL
STREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
EUCALYPTUS
STREET
AVENUE
BOULEVARD
SPRUCE
AVENUE
J:\126-2647\tentative\SUM.dwg, 1/10/2022 10:59:04 AM, dmartinez Exhibit A
22'-0"
FITNESSCO-WORK BREEZEWAY
ENTRY FITNESS ELECTRICAL\MPOE LEASING
ENTRY
23'-6"
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE
12 4 7 896
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE
CO-WORKENTERTAINMENTENTERTAINMENTLEASING
20'-3"
23'-6 1/2"
22'-0"
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE
12'-1"
T.O. PLATE
48"
22"
BREEZWAY
FITNESS
30'-0" X 58'-6"
YOGA
30'-0" X 17'-0"
CO-WORK
20'-6" X 27'-4"
MPOE/IT
JANITOR
LEASING
25'-0" X 32'-0"
MAINTENANCE/
STORAGE RESTROOM OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
BREAK RM.
11'-0" X 16'-0"
ENTERTAINMENT
44'-0" X 23'-0"
CONF.
17'-0" X 13'-6"
CONF.
10'-0" X 13'-6"
MEN
WOMEN
5'-0"
PORCH
19'-0" X 22'-0"
ELEC.
2,515 SQ. FT.
3,018 SQ. FT.
1,532 SQ. FT.
1,000 SQ. FT.
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
A1.0 CLUBHOUSE - ELEVATIONS
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION
WEST
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
Exhibit C
48"
22"
BREEZWAY
FITNESS
30'-0" X 58'-6"
YOGA
30'-0" X 17'-0"
CO-WORK
20'-6" X 27'-4"
MPOE/IT
JANITOR
LEASING
25'-0" X 32'-0"
MAINTENANCE/
STORAGE RESTROOM OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
BREAK RM.
11'-0" X 16'-0"
ENTERTAINMENT
44'-0" X 23'-0"
CONF.
17'-0" X 13'-6"
CONF.
10'-0" X 13'-6"
MEN
WOMEN
5'-0"
PORCH
19'-0" X 22'-0"
ELEC.
2,515 SQ. FT.
3,018 SQ. FT.
1,532 SQ. FT.
1,000 SQ. FT.
A1.1 CLUBHOUSE - RENDERINGS
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
3 FITNESS CORNER 4 LEASING CORNER
2 COVERED WALKWAY
P4
1 ENTRYP3
P2
P1
48"
22"
BREEZWAY
FITNESS
30'-0" X 58'-6"
YOGA
30'-0" X 17'-0"
CO-WORK
20'-6" X 27'-4"
MPOE/IT
JANITOR
LEASING
25'-0" X 32'-0"
MAINTENANCE/
STORAGE RESTROOM OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
BREAK RM.
11'-0" X 16'-0"
ENTERTAINMENT
44'-0" X 23'-0"
CONF.
17'-0" X 13'-6"
CONF.
10'-0" X 13'-6"
MEN
WOMEN
PORCH
19'-0" X 22'-0"
ELEC.
2,515 SQ. FT.
3,018 SQ. FT.
1,532 SQ. FT.
1,000 SQ. FT.
POOL EQUIP.
10'-0" X 15'-0"
WC
DOG WASH
WC
SHOWERS
A1.2 CLUBHOUSE - GROUND FLOOR PLAN
NORTH
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
A1.3 CLUBHOUSE - ROOF PLAN
NORTH
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
± 40'-6" TO
TOP OF ROOF
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
1 2 3 4 579 68 6
29'-3" 3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 38'-6" TO
TOP OF ROOF
± 40'-6" TO
TOP OF ROOF
UP
18R
S
S
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
S
FIRE
RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
± 40'-6" TO
TOP OF ROOF
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
± 40'-6" TO
TOP OF ROOF
± 38'-6" TO
TOP OF ROOF
29'-3" 3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
A2.0 ELEVATIONS - 20 PLEX
LEFT
FRONT
RIGHT
REAR
FRONT ELEVATION
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
P2
P1
REAR ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION
FRONTREAR
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
3-STORY WALK-UP
LOCATION OF ART
*
*
A3
S1 A2 S2488 SF 682 SF
615 SF
824 SF
LEVEL 1
121'-0"
64'-1"
MPOE ELECTRIALFIRE
RISER
UP
18R
S
S/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICEMPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
FIRE
RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
8'-1"
11'-4" 11'-7"
10'-8"
26'-11"
11'-0"
8'-8"
11'-0"
5'-0"
10'-10"
12'-0"
11'-0"
13'-6"
11'-2"
12'-4"
15'-7"
8'-9"
4'-9"
6'-5"9'-4"
15'-10"
14'-2"
9'-3"
10'-5"
9'-3"
19'-5"
121'-0"
B1
A3A3
S1 A2 S2
A1
488 SF
824 SF
LEVEL 2
824 SF
615 SF
682 SF
B1
1,008 SF 744 SF
B1
1,008 SF
S
S
S/C
SS S
UP
18R
DN
18R
UP
18R
DN
18R
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
63'-9"
12'-0"
11'-0" 12'-2"
17'-5"
5'-4"6'-6"
8'-0"
11'-11" 9'-6"
12'-6"
10'-8"
7'-9"
8'-3"
11'-9"
17'-5"
6'-4"11'-0"
12'-0"
8'-1"
11'-4" 11'-7"
10'-8"
26'-11"
11'-0"
8'-8"
11'-0"
5'-0"
10'-10"
12'-0"
11'-0"
13'-6"
11'-2"
12'-4"
15'-7"
8'-9"
4'-9"
6'-5"9'-4"
15'-10"
14'-2"
9'-3"
10'-5"
9'-3"
19'-5"
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
A2.1 BUILDING PLANS - 20 PLEX
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
3-STORY WALK-UP
STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
B1B1
A3A3
S1 A2 S2
A1
1,008 SF
LEVEL 3
B1
488 SF
824 SF 824 SF
615 SF
682 SF
1,008 SF 744 SF
S
DN
18R
S
S/C
S
S S
DN
18R
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
121'-0"
63'-9"
122'-4"
66'-2"
ROOF
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
1'-0"
TYP.
1/4:12
PER FOOT, TYP.
10'-6"
12'-3"
T.O.P.=+5'-9"
T.O.P.=+5'-9"
1'-0"
TYP.
1/4:12
PER FOOT, TYP.
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
CONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEW
BY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.)
AC UNIT
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
3-STORY WALK-UP
A2.2 BUILDING PLANS - 20 PLEX
3-STORY WALK-UP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
UP
18R
S
SS
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
S
SD
S/C
FIRE
RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
123 4578 9 6
± 41'-9" TO
TOP OF ROOF
29'-3" 3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 38'-6" TO
TOP OF ROOF
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
± 41'-9" TO
TOP OF ROOF
29'-3" 3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 38'-6" TO
TOP OF ROOF
± 37'-10" TO
TOP OF ROOF
± 40'-5" TO
TOP OF ROOF
± 42'-0" TO
TOP OF ROOF
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
A2.3 ELEVATIONS - 23 PLEX
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
LEFT
FRONT
RIGHT
REAR P2
P1
FRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION
FRONTREAR
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
3-STORY WALK-UP
LOCATION OF ART
*
*
138'-0"
UP
18R
SS
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICEMPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP
18R
FIRE
RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
61'-3"
8'-1"
11'-4" 11'-7"
10'-8"
26'-11"
11'-0"
12'-0"
11'-0"
8'-8"
11'-0"
13'-6"
11'-2"
12'-4"
15'-7"
8'-9"
4'-9"
6'-5"9'-4"
5'-0"
10'-10"
138'-6"
S S
S S S
UP
18R
DN
18R
UP
18R
DN
18R
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
63'-9"
10'-1" 11'-4" 11'-7"
10'-8"
26'-11"
11'-0"
12'-0"
11'-0"
8'-8"
11'-0"
13'-6"
11'-2"
12'-4"
15'-7"
8'-9"
4'-9"
12'-6"
10'-8"
7'-9"
8'-3"
11'-9"
17'-5"
6'-4"11'-0"
12'-0"
6'-5"9'-4"
5'-0"
10'-10"
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
3-STORY WALK-UP
A2.4 BUILDING PLANS - 23 PLEX
3-STORY WALK-UP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
138'-6"
DN
18R
DN
18RS S
S S S
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
63'-9"
140'-6"
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
10'-0"
7:12
SLOPE, TYP.
1'-0"
TYP.
10'-0"
2'-0" 7'-2"
6'-0"
1'-0"
TYP.
2'-0"
T.O.P.=+5'-9"
T.O.P.=+3'-9"
T.O.P.=+5'-9"
T.O.P.=+3'-9"
T.O.P.=+5'-9"
T.O.P.=+3'-9"T.O.P.=+3'-9"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
10'-0"
4'-6"
66'-2"
ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
CONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEW
BY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.)
AC UNIT
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
3-STORY WALK-UP
A2.5 BUILDING PLANS - 23 PLEX
3-STORY WALK-UP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
SS
S
S
S
S
UP
18R
UP
18R
S
S
SD
S/C
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT 3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
12345 6 789 6
± 40'-9" TO
TOP OF ROOF
29'-3" 3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 37'-9" TO
TOP OF ROOF
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1"
± 40'-9" TO
TOP OF ROOF
29'-3" 3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 37'-3" TO
TOP OF ROOF
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
A2.6 ELEVATIONS - 37 PLEX
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
LEFT
FRONT
RIGHT
REAR P2
P1
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
FRONTREAR
FRONT ELEVATIONLEFT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION
3-STORY WALK-UP
210'-6"
SS S
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
UP
18R
UP
18R
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT 3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
61'-3"
9'-1" 11'-4" 11'-7"
10'-8"
26'-11"
11'-0"
12'-0"
11'-0"
8'-8"
11'-0"
13'-6"
11'-2"
12'-4"
8'-9"
4'-9"
6'-4"9'-4"
13'-0"
11'-0"12'-2"
22'-6"
7'-8"
9'-7"
11'-6"
14'-0"
11'-1"
6'-11"
13'-1"
15'-0"
210'-6"
S
S
SSSS
SS
UP
18R
DN
18R
S
UP
18R
DN
18R
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
63'-9"
9'-1" 11'-4" 11'-7"
10'-8"
26'-11"
11'-0"
12'-0"
11'-0"
13'-6"
11'-2"
12'-4"
8'-9"
4'-9"
6'-4"9'-4"
13'-0"
11'-0"
22'-6"
7'-8"
9'-7"
11'-6"
14'-0"
11'-1"
6'-11"
13'-1"
15'-0"
7'-0"
8'-8"
11'-0"
4'-1"
4'-3"
12'-6"
10'-8"
7'-9"
8'-3"
11'-9"
17'-5"
6'-4"11'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
11'-0"12'-2"
17'-5"
5'-4"6'-6"
8'-0"
11'-11" 9'-6"
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
3-STORY WALK-UP
A2.7 BUILDING PLANS - 37 PLEX
3-STORY WALK-UP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
210'-6"
DN
18R SS
S
SSSS
SS
DN
18R
S
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
63'-9"
212'-6"
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
3:12
PER FOOT
7'-6"
17'-6" 7'-0"
T.O.P.=+5'-9"
1'-0"
TYP.
1'-0"
TYP.
15'-0"
T.O.P.=+5'-9"T.O.P.=+5'-9"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
HEEL HEIGHT = 2'-6"
T.O.P.=+5'-9"
66'-1"
ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
CONCEALED FROM EXTERIOR VIEW
BY PERIMETER PARAPET WALLS (TYP.)
AC UNIT
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
3-STORY WALK-UP
A2.8 BUILDING PLANS - 37 PLEX
3-STORY WALK-UP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
UNIT S1 (FLOORS 1-3 ADA)
STUDIO - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 488 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 69 SQ. FT.
21'-3"
36'-2"
LIVING
ROOM
11'-6"x8'-7"
FLEX
DINING
KITCHEN
BATH
W/D
SLEEPING
9'-2"x8'-6"
PATIO
11'-6"x6'-11"
ENTRY
6'-11"
REF
P
CB
36"x60" Q
4'-3"
CB
CB
UNIT A2 (FLOORS 1-3 - ADA)
1 BDRM - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 682 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 73 SQ. FT.
23'-5"
36'-2"
BEDROOM
11'-6"x11'
LIVING
ROOM
11'-0"x16'-6"
PATIO
11'-0"x7'-4"
KITCHEN
W/D
L
BATH
ENTRY
CB
7'-4"
36"x 60"
P
REF
DINING
ROOM
5'-2"
Q
UNIT A1 (UPPER FLOORS - NON-ADA)
1 BDRM - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 744 SQ. FT.
BALCONY : 44 SQ. FT.
32'-6"
24'-10"
LIVING
ROOM
12'-2"x15'-2"
BEDROOM
11'-0"x12'-0"BALCONY
8'-0"x5-4"
FLEX
8'-0"x8'-4"
ENTRY BATH
W.I.C.
KITCHEN
REF
P
D
K
W
36"x60"
5Mdf
SHLVS
FURNITURE
LIVING
ROOM
11'-8"x15'-2"
BEDROOM
11'-0"x12'-0"
BEDROOM
11'-0"x12'-6"
BALCONY
7'-10"x5'-2"
KITCHEN
FLEX
DINING
8'-0"x8'-4"
ENTRY
W.I.C.
P
UNIT B1 (UPPER FLOORS NON-ADA)
2 BDRM - 2 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 1008 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 53 SQ. FT.
43'-4"
24'-10"
D BATH
BATH
REF
W.I.C.
Q
36" x 60"
K
W
36" x 60"
5Mdf
SHLVS
BUILT-IN
ISLAND
ENTRY
CBCB
KITCHEN
P
LIVING
ROOM
12'-2"x12'-6"
PATIO
11'-4"x6'-6"
BEDROOM
11'-6"x13'-0"
BATH
W.I.C.
W/D
BATH
BEDROOM
11'-0"x12'-6"
UNIT B2 (FIRST FLOOR - ADA)
2 BDRM - 2 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 1,128 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 92 SQ. FT.
35'-10"
36'-8"
DINING
ROOM
36" x 60"
L
L
REF
W.I.C
BUILD OUT
ON FIRST
FLOOR ONLY
K
Q
BUILT-IN
ISLAND
36" x 60"
UNIT S2 (FIRST FLOOR - ADA)
STUDIO - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 615 SQ. FT.
17'-0"
36'-2"
LIVING
ROOM
13'-8"x15'-8"
BATH
ENTRY
W/D
SLEEPING
8'-10"x9'-4"
CLOSET
KITCHEN
REF
P
LINEN
Q
3'-6"
36"x60"
UNIT A3 (FIRST FLOOR - ADA)
1 BDRM - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 824 SQ. FT.
PATIO : 126 SQ. FT.
24'-4"
40'-6"
BEDROOM
11'-0"x12'-0"
PATIO
12'-1"x10'-5"
KITCHEN
LIVING
ROOM
13'-6"x12'-3"
DINING
ROOM
W.I.C.
ENTRY
REF
K
23'-4"
L
P
COATS
BATH
W/D
L 36"x60"
CB
CB
BUILT-IN
DESK
A3.0 UNIT PLANS
3/16"=1'-0"
4' 8' 16' 0 2' 1'
3-STORY WALK-UP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP 18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP 18R
UP 18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18R
KP
KP KP KP
UP
18R
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
222
PRINTER 2 2 2
PRINTER
22 PRINTER
2 2
PRINTER
22 KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
UP
5' DIA.
5' DIA.
END OF
LOWER LEV
GATE
UP
30"
24 49
30"
24 4930"
24 49
30"24
49 30"24
49 OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
30"
24 49
30"
24 49
30"
24 49
30"
24 49
4.8%
7.2%
30"24
49 30"
24 49
F O O T H I L L B L V D .
M I L L I K E N A V E .
E L M A V E .
C H U R C H S T .
C H U R C H S T .
M I L L I K E N A V E .
F O O T H I L L B L V D .
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 12
11 10
G-2
G-3
G-4
G-1
G-6
G-5
G-7
B-12
37-PLEX
B-11
23-PLEX
B-10
37-PLEX
B-7
20-PLEX
B-6
23-PLEX
B-3
20-PLEX
B-4
23-PLEX
B-8
37-PLEX
B-9
23-PLEX
B-1
37-PLEX
B-2
23-PLEX
B-5
20-PLEX
A4.0 3-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVE
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-19-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
CORNER OF CHURCH AND ELM
ELM AVENUE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP 18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP 18R
UP 18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18R
KP
KP KP KP
UP
18R
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2 22
PRINTER 2 2 2
PRINTER
22 PRINTER
2 2
PRINTER
22 KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
UP
5' DIA.
5' DIA.
END OF
LOWER LEV
GATE
UP
30"
24 49
30"
24 4930"
24 49
30"24
49 30"24
49 OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
30"
24 49
30"
24 49
30"
24 49
30"
24 49
4.8%
7.2%
30"24
49 30"
24 49
F O O T H I L L B L V D .
M I L L I K E N A V E .
E L M A V E .
C H U R C H S T .
C H U R C H S T .
M I L L I K E N A V E .
F O O T H I L L B L V D .
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 12
11 10
G-2
G-3
G-4
G-1
G-6
G-5
G-7
B-12
37-PLEX
B-11
23-PLEX
B-10
37-PLEX
B-7
20-PLEX
B-6
23-PLEX
B-3
20-PLEX
B-4
23-PLEX
B-8
37-PLEX
B-9
23-PLEX
B-1
37-PLEX
B-2
23-PLEX
B-5
20-PLEX
A4.1 3-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVE
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-19-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
CHURCH STREET ENTRY
CHURCH STREET
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP 18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP 18R
UP 18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KPKP
UP18R
KP
KP KP KP
UP
18R
KP KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
2 22
PRINTER 2 2 2
PRINTER
22 PRINTER
2 2
PRINTER
22 KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
UP
5' DIA.
5' DIA.
END OF
LOWER LEV
GATE
UP
30"
24 49
30"
24 4930"
24 49
30"24
49 30"24
49 OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
30"
24 49
30"
24 49
30"
24 49
30"
24 49
4.8%
7.2%
30"24
49 30"
24 49
F O O T H I L L B L V D .
M I L L I K E N A V E .
E L M A V E .
C H U R C H S T .
C H U R C H S T .
M I L L I K E N A V E .
F O O T H I L L B L V D .
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 12
11 10
G-2
G-3
G-4
G-1
G-6
G-5
G-7
B-12
37-PLEX
B-11
23-PLEX
B-10
37-PLEX
B-7
20-PLEX
B-6
23-PLEX
B-3
20-PLEX
B-4
23-PLEX
B-8
37-PLEX
B-9
23-PLEX
B-1
37-PLEX
B-2
23-PLEX
B-5
20-PLEX
A4.2 3-STORY WALK-UP - PERSPECTIVE
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-19-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND CHURCH
MILLIKEN AVENUE
1 29
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±20'-9"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±20'-9"
T.O. ROOF
±20'-9"
T.O. ROOF
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
A5.0 ELEVATION G-1
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
STAND ALONE GARAGE
LOCATION OF ART
*
*
9 ±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
1 2
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
A5.1 ELEVATION G-2
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
STAND ALONE GARAGE
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
91 2
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
A5.2 ELEVATION G-3
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
STAND ALONE GARAGE
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
1 299
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
A5.3 ELEVATION G-4
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
STAND ALONE GARAGE
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
2 91
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
A5.4 ELEVATION G-5
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
STAND ALONE GARAGE
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
29 ±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±16'-10"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
1 1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
A5.5 ELEVATION G-6
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
STAND ALONE GARAGE
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
12 9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±13'-8"
T.O. ROOF
9'-1"
T.O. PLATE
±13'-8"
T.O. ROOF
±13'-8"
T.O. ROOF
9 1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
A5.6 ELEVATION G-7
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
STAND ALONE GARAGE
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
LOCATION OF ART
*
*
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 6
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1" 9'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
15'-0" 9'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 54'-2"
TOP OF ROOF
± 57'-3" TO
T.O. FIN
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
1 SOUTH ELEVATION
2 SW CORNER PERSPECTIVE
3 SE CORNER PERSPECTIVE
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-19-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1 WRAP
B2.0 ELEVATION - SOUTH
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
23
12 45 6 789 6
3 3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1" 9'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
15'-0" 9'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 54'-2"
TOP OF ROOF
± 57'-3" TO
T.O. FIN
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
1 WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
WRAP
B2.1 ELEVATION - SOUTH ENLARGEMENT
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
1 SOUTH ELEVATION
2 SOUTH ELEVATION
2 MATCH MATCH
MATCH MATCH
ROOF LOUNGE
ROOF LOUNGE
123 456 7 89
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1" 10'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1" 12'-1"
LOUNGE
T.O. PLATE
± 51'-10"
TOP OF ROOF
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
1 EAST ELEVATION
1 3
2 2 NE CORNER PERSPECTIVE
3 EAST PERSPECTIVE
ROOF LOUNGE
ROOF LOUNGE
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
WRAP
B2.2 ELEVATION - EAST
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
123 45 7 89
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
ROOF LOUNGE
ROOF LOUNGE
6 3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1" 10'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1" 12'-1"
LOUNGE
T.O. PLATE
± 51'-10"
TOP OF ROOF
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
WRAP
B2.3 ELEVATION - EAST ENLARGEMENT
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
1 EAST ELEVATION
2 EAST ELEVATION
2 MATCH MATCH
MATCH MATCH
1
123 4 567 8 9
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 51'-0"
TOP OF ROOF9'-1" 9'-1"10'-11"
4TH STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 53'-4"
TOP OF PARAPET
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
1 NORTH ELEVATION
2 NE CORNER PERSPECTIVE
3 NW CORNER PERSPECTIVE
1 32
ROOF LOUNGE
GARAGE ENTRY
GARAGE ENTRY
RESIDENT'S LOBBY
RESIDENT'S LOBBY
GARAGE ENTRYRESIDENT'S LOUNGE
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
WRAP
B2.4 ELEVATION - NORTH
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
123 4 567 8 9
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 51'-0"
TOP OF ROOF9'-1" 9'-1"10'-11"
4TH STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 53'-4"
TOP OF PARAPET
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
1 WRAP
B2.5 ELEVATION - NORTH ENLARGEMENT
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
2 1 NORTH ELEVATION
2 NORTH ELEVATION
MATCH MATCH
MATCH MATCH
123 456 7 89
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 52'-3"
TOP OF ROOF9'-1" 9'-1"15'-0"
4TH STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 57'-3"
TOP OF PARAPET
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
B2.6 ELEVATIONS - WEST
1 WEST ELEVATION
2 NW CORNER PERSPECTIVE
3 SW CORNER PERSPECTIVE1
3 2
RESIDENT'S LOUNGEGARAGE ENTRY
GARAGE ENTRY
GARAGE ENTRY RESIDENT'S LOUNGERESIDENT'S LOBBY
RESIDENT'S LOBBY
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
WRAP
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
12456 7 8
1. CONCRETE FLAT TILE
2. STUCCO
3. STUCCO TRIM
4. VINYL WINDOW
5. METAL GUARDRAIL
6. METAL AWNING
7. BOARD AND BATTEN
8. COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
9. WALL SCONCE
3 9
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 52'-3"
TOP OF ROOF9'-1" 9'-1"15'-0"
4TH STORY
T.O. PLATE
± 57'-3"
TOP OF PARAPET
B2.7 ELEVATIONS - WEST
1 WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
WRAP
1 NORTH ELEVATION
2 NORTH ELEVATION
MATCH MATCH
MATCH MATCH
1/8"=1'-0"
24' 08' 4'16'
2
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP 18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP 18R
FIRE RISER
UP 18R
S
S/C
J
S S/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
S
SD
S/C
FIRE
RISER
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP
18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
S
S/C
J
S
S/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
S
SD S/C
FIRE
RISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP 18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
ELECTRICAL
MPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF
3DP
CB
SD
S/C
S
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
S
PATIO
J
S S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
FIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF3D P
CB
SD
S/C
S
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
S
PATIO
J
S S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
FIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF3D P
CB
SD
S/C
S
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
FIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF
3D
P
CB
SD
S/C
S
222
PRINTER 2 2 2
PRINTER
22 PRINTER
2 2
PRINTER
22 BREEZWAY
MPOE/IT
JANITOR
MAINTENANCE/
STORAGE RESTROOM
MEN
WOMEN
ELEC.
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
R
TR
T
MAINT. RM.
KP
KP
UP18R
S
S/C
J
S
S/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
SD
S/C
FIRE
RISER
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
ELECTRICALMPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
FITNESS
30'-0" X 58'-6"
YOGA
30'-0" X 17'-0"
CO-WORK
20'-6" X 27'-4"
LEASING
25'-0" X 32'-0"
RESTROOM OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
BREAK RM.
11'-0" X 16'-0"
ENTERTAINMENT
44'-0" X 23'-0"
CONF.
17'-0" X 13'-6"
CONF.
10'-0" X 13'-6"
PORCH
19'-0" X 22'-0"
#############
#############
#############
#############
POOL EQUIP.
10'-3" X 15'-0"
WC
WC
SHOWERS
MAIL
UP
UP
5' DIA.
TRASH
ROOM
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
RETAIL
TRASH RM
5' DIA.
TRASH
ROOM
TENANT
TRASHROOM
C C C C C C C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
G
G
TURN
AROUND
END OFLOWER LEV
GATE
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
GG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G G
G
G
G
G
TURN
AROUND
G
G
G
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 1415
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 UP
A4
A4
A4
A3
A4
A4
A4
A4
30"2449
B4
B3
A4
B3 ABOVE
A4
A5 A1
B1
A3
30"
24 4930"
24 49
A3
A5
A5
A3
A5
ELECT. ROOM
MAINT.
SHOP
A5A5
BREAKFAST
REST.
3,700 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,200 SF
SALON NAILS
SHOP
MEXICAN
REST.
4,600 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,900 SF
LOBBY
PASSAGEWAY
PASSAGEWAY
PARKING ENTRY
A4
A3
A4
30"
24 49
PASSAGEWAY
A1 ABOVE
A3 ABOVE
B3 ABOVE
30"24
49 PASSAGEWAY
SERVICE CORRIDOR
SERVICE CORRIDOR
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
B4
A5 A5
B1
B3
B1
A5
B3
30"24
49 A3
30"24
49 A3
B3
B1
A5
A5
A5
B3
B3
B3 ABOVE
20 PASSAGEWAY
B4
A1
B3
A5A1
A1
A1
PASSAGEWAY
#############
LOBBY
FITNESS
COURTYARD
POOL
COURTYARD
16 17
13 13
15 17
B3
9 LV
LV
30"24
49 A3
A1
18 A3 ABOVE
A3
30"24 49
POOL
EQUIPMENT
MAIL
& PARCELS
###########
MEN
WOMEN
B3 ABOVE
B3
ALT 2
B3
ALT 1
A5
ALT 2
B4
ALT 1
B4
ALT 2
B4
A5
ALT 1
LV
A8
T.B.D
34 STALLS
COMMERCIAL PARKING
COMMERCIAL 85 STALLS
RESIDENTIAL
40 STALLS
14 18
13 4.8%
7.2%
16 15.6
12.5 17
16 17 18
18 17
18 18
18 16
18 A3
30"
24 49
ELECT. ROOM
B3
A3
30"
24 49
ELECT. ROOM
32 BREAKFAST
REST.
3,700 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,200 SF
SALON NAILS
SHOP
MEXICAN
REST.
4,600 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,900 SF
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 12
11 10
G-2
G-3
G-4
G-1
G-6
G-5
G-7
MILLIKEN AVE.
ELM AVE.
CHURCH ST.
T
MAINT.
EXISTING
TERRA VISTA COMMONS
RETAIL CENTER
N.A.P. EXISTING SHELL STATION
B-12
37-PLEX
B-11
23-PLEX
B-10
37-PLEX
B-7
20-PLEX
B-6
23-PLEX
B-3
20-PLEX
B-4
23-PLEX
B-8
37-PLEX
B-9
23-PLEX
B-1
37-PLEX
B-2
23-PLEX
G-7
6-GARAGES
G-6
28-GARAGES
G-5
30-GARAGES
G-4
22-GARAGES
G-3
20-GARAGES
G-2
24-GARAGES
G-1
18-GARAGES
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
B-5
20-PLEX
MAINT.
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
B2.8 WRAP - PARKING GARAGE - LINE OF SIGHT VIEWS
51 6
2 7 3 4 8
VIEW 1 " LOOKING SOUTH FROM CHURCH STREET INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 350' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".
VIEW 2 " LOOKING SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF CHURCH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 340' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".
VIEW 3 "LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVE AND FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 160' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".
VIEW 4 " LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 170' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP 18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP 18R
FIRE RISER
UP 18R
S
S/C
J
S S/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
S
SD
S/C
FIRE
RISER
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP
18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
S
S/C
J
S
S/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
S
SD S/C
FIRE
RISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP 18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KPKPKP
ELECTRICAL
MPOEFIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP KP KP KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF
3DP
CB
SD
S/C
S
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
S
PATIO
J
S S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
FIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICEELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF3D P
CB
SD
S/C
S
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
S
PATIO
J
S S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
FIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP
18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF3D P
CB
SD
S/C
S
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
FIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF
3D
P
CB
SD
S/C
S
2 22
PRINTER 2 2 2
PRINTER
22 PRINTER
2 2
PRINTER
22 BREEZWAY
MPOE/IT
JANITOR
MAINTENANCE/
STORAGE RESTROOM
MEN
WOMEN
ELEC.
ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
R
TR
T
MAINT. RM.
KP
KP
UP18R
S
S/C
J
S
S/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
SD
S/C
FIRE
RISER
KPKP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
KP
DUMPSTERBY OTHERS
A(TRASH)
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
ELECTRICALMPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
FITNESS
30'-0" X 58'-6"
YOGA
30'-0" X 17'-0"
CO-WORK
20'-6" X 27'-4"
LEASING
25'-0" X 32'-0"
RESTROOM OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
BREAK RM.
11'-0" X 16'-0"
ENTERTAINMENT
44'-0" X 23'-0"
CONF.
17'-0" X 13'-6"
CONF.
10'-0" X 13'-6"
PORCH
19'-0" X 22'-0"
#############
#############
#############
#############
POOL EQUIP.
10'-3" X 15'-0"
WC
WC
SHOWERS
MAIL
UP
UP
5' DIA.
TRASH
ROOM
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
RETAIL
TRASH RM
5' DIA.
TRASH
ROOM
TENANT
TRASHROOM
C C C C C C C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
G
G
TURN
AROUND
END OFLOWER LEV
GATE
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
GG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G G
G
G
G
G
TURN
AROUND
G
G
G
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 1415
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 UP
A4
A4
A4
A3
A4
A4
A4
A4
30"2449
B4
B3
A4
B3 ABOVE
A4
A5 A1
B1
A3
30"
24 4930"
24 49
A3
A5
A5
A3
A5
ELECT. ROOM
MAINT.
SHOP
A5A5
BREAKFAST
REST.
3,700 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,200 SF
SALON NAILS
SHOP
MEXICAN
REST.
4,600 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,900 SF
LOBBY
PASSAGEWAY
PASSAGEWAY
PARKING ENTRY
A4
A3
A4
30"
24 49
PASSAGEWAY
A1 ABOVE
A3 ABOVE
B3 ABOVE
30"24
49 PASSAGEWAY
SERVICE CORRIDOR
SERVICE CORRIDOR
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
B4
A5 A5
B1
B3
B1
A5
B3
30"24
49 A3
30"24
49 A3
B3
B1
A5
A5
A5
B3
B3
B3 ABOVE
20 PASSAGEWAY
B4
A1
B3
A5A1
A1
A1
PASSAGEWAY
#############
LOBBY
FITNESS
COURTYARD
POOL
COURTYARD
16 17
13 13
15 17
B3
9 LV
LV
30"24
49 A3
A1
18 A3 ABOVE
A3
30"24 49
POOL
EQUIPMENT
MAIL
& PARCELS
###########
MEN
WOMEN
B3 ABOVE
B3
ALT 2
B3
ALT 1
A5
ALT 2
B4
ALT 1
B4
ALT 2
B4
A5
ALT 1
LV
A8
T.B.D
34 STALLS
COMMERCIAL PARKING
COMMERCIAL 85 STALLS
RESIDENTIAL
40 STALLS
14 18
13 4.8%
7.2%
16 15.6
12.5 17
16 17 18
18 17
18 18
18 16
18 A3
30"
24 49
ELECT. ROOM
B3
A3
30"
24 49
ELECT. ROOM
32 BREAKFAST
REST.
3,700 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,200 SF
SALON NAILS
SHOP
MEXICAN
REST.
4,600 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,900 SF
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 12
11 10
G-2
G-3
G-4
G-1
G-6
G-5
G-7
MILLIKEN AVE.
ELM AVE.
CHURCH ST.
T
MAINT.
EXISTING
TERRA VISTA COMMONS
RETAIL CENTER
N.A.P. EXISTING SHELL STATION
B-12
37-PLEX
B-11
23-PLEX
B-10
37-PLEX
B-7
20-PLEX
B-6
23-PLEX
B-3
20-PLEX
B-4
23-PLEX
B-8
37-PLEX
B-9
23-PLEX
B-1
37-PLEX
B-2
23-PLEX
G-7
6-GARAGES
G-6
28-GARAGES
G-5
30-GARAGES
G-4
22-GARAGES
G-3
20-GARAGES
G-2
24-GARAGES
G-1
18-GARAGES
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
B-5
20-PLEX
MAINT.
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
51 6
2 7 3 4 8
VIEW 5 "LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM CHURCH STREET INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 580' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".
VIEW 6 " LOOKING SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF CHURCH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 470' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".
VIEW 8 "LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 690' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".
VIEW 7 " LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM FOOTHILL AVE INTO COMMUNITY, APPROXIMATELY 420' FROM THE NEAREST FACE OF THE WRAP BUILDING".
EXISTING TERRA VISTA
COMMONS BUILDINGEXISTING McDONALD'S
RESTAURANT
B2.9 WRAP - PARKING GARAGE - LINE OF SIGHT VIEWS
48"
22"
BREEZWAY
5'-0"
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
S
S
S
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
S
SD
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
KP
S
S
S
S
S
S
UP18R
UP18R
S
40'-6"
S
SD
S/C
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
S
S
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
S
KP
KP
KP
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
4:12
PER FOOT
43 44
46 47
UP
UP
5' DIA.
TRASH
ROOM
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
RETAIL
TRASH RM
5' DIA.
TRASH
ROOM
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
C C C C C C C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
G
G
TURN
AROUND
END OF
LOWER LEV
GATE
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
14 15
16 17
18 19 20
21 22
23 24
25 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 45
4849 50 51 52 53 54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
95 96
97 98
99 100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
3.1% RAMP UP
1.6% RAMP UP4.6% RAMP DN
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
GG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G G
G
C
G
G
TURN
AROUND
C
G
G
UP
TURN
AROUND
A4
A4
A4
A3
A4
A4
A4
A4
30"24
49 B4
B3
A4
B3 ABOVE
14'-6"
T
T
A4
14'-6"
A5 A1
B1
A3
30"24
4930"24
49 A3
A5
11'-5"
A5
A3
A5
ELECT. ROOM
MAINT.SHOP
A5A5
BREAKFAST
REST.
3,700 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,200 SF
SALON NAILS
SHOP
MEXICAN
REST.
4,600 SF
DINING
PATIO
1,900 SF
LOBBY
PASSAGEWAY
PASSAGEWAY
PARKING ENTRY
46'-3"
91'-3"
114'-3"
A4
A3
A4
30"24
49 PASSAGEWAY
A1 ABOVE
A3 ABOVE
B3 ABOVE
30"24
49 PASSAGEWAY
SERVICE CORRIDOR
SERVICE CORRIDOR
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
B4
A5 A5
B1
B3
B1
A5
B3
30"24
49 A3
30"24
49 A3
B3
B1
A5
A5
A5
A1 ABOVE
B3
B3
B3 ABOVE
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
20 STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
PASSAGEWAY
B4
A1
B3
A5A1
A1
A1
PASSAGEWAY
1,077 SQ. FT.
LOBBY
FITNESS
COURTYARD
POOL
COURTYARD
16 17
13 13 15 17
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
MILLIKEN AVE.
FOOTHILL BLVD.
B3
492'-8"
519'-7"
65'-3" 123' 44'-10" 110' 101'-7" 74'-11"
189'-9" 221'-10"
410'-2"
58'-5"
27'-4"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"
STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"
9 STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
LV
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
LV
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"
30"
24 49
A3
28'-2"
12'-4"
A1
19'-10"
19'-10"
26'
19'-10"
19'-10"
26'
22'-10"
12'-4"
16'-2"
27'-3"
26'-9"
30'
25'
14'-9"
14'-1"
13'-2"
11'-6"
17'-4"
12'-5"
13'
15'-11"
26'
15'-5"
29'-3"
19'
30'-4"
31'-2"
32'-2"
19'
18 7'
6'
A3 ABOVE
A3
7'
30"24
49 POOL
EQUIPMENT
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-5" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4"
7'
MAIL
& PARCELS
966 SQ. FT.
7'
7'
7'
7'
6'
7'
MEN
WOMEN
STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-4" X 4'-0"
B3 ABOVE
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
7'
7'
46'-2"46'-2"
47'100'38'-8"
58'-6" 61'-3" 75' 24'-5"
49'-8"49'-8"
B3
ALT 2
B3
ALT 1
7'7'
A5
ALT 2
B4
ALT 1
B4
ALT 2
7'
7'
B4
A5
ALT 1
STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4"
LV
A8
T.B.D
48"
22"
BREEZWAY
5'-0"
33 STALLS
COMMERCIAL PARKING
COMMERCIAL 85 STALLS
RESIDENTIAL40 STALLS
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 30
31 32
33 14
18 13
4.8%
7.2%
16 15.6 12.5
17 16
17 18
18 17 18
18 18
16 18
A3
30"24
49 ELECT. ROOM
B3
A3
30"24
49 ELECT. ROOM
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-0"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
32STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
15 29
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
P
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
S/C
J
S
S/C
S
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
S
SD S/C
FIRE
RISER
UP18R
K
KP
S
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN
SERVICE
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
UP18R
FIRE RISER
KP
J
S
S/C
S
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
S
PATIO
J
S
S/C
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
FIRE RISER
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
KP
UP18R
KP
KP
KP
ELECTRICAL MAIN SERVICE
ELECTRICAL
S
SD
S/C
S
REF
3D
P
CB
SD S/C
S
222
PRINTER 2 2 2
PRINTER
22 PRINTER
2 2
PRINTER
22 BREEZWAY
MPOE/IT
JANITOR
MAINTENANCE/
STORAGE RESTROOM
MEN
WOMEN
ELEC.
ELECTRICAL
MPOE
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
KP
FITNESS
30'-0" X 58'-6"
YOGA
30'-0" X 17'-0"
CO-WORK
20'-6" X 27'-4"
LEASING
25'-0" X 32'-0"
RESTROOM OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
OFFICE
11'-0" X 11'-0"
BREAK RM.
11'-0" X 16'-0"
ENTERTAINMENT
44'-0" X 23'-0"
CONF.
17'-0" X 13'-6"
CONF.
10'-0" X 13'-6"
PORCH
19'-0" X 22'-0"
#############
#############
#############
#############
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
S S S S S S S S
S
S
W
W
F O O T H I L L B L V D .
M I L L I K E N A V E .
I L L I K E N A V E .
F O O T H I L L B L V D .
S S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
SS
S
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
WWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W W
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
WWW
WW
7 11
10 G-7
11'-2"
MI
7'
26'
28'-9"
12'-9"19'-10"
26'
19'-10"
19'
26'
23'-2"
24'
11 6
176
26 26'
32'-4"
37'-11"
19'-10"
26'
17'
19'-10"
26'
19'-10"
12'-8"
26'-2"
26'-9"
15'-2"
19'-2"
15'-2"
13'19'-10"
26'
19'-10"6'-6"
17'-4"
17'
15'-6"
3'
14'-5"
22'-6"
22'-5"
25'-4"
30'21'-10"
14'-10"
17'-4"
11'-1"
13'-1"17'-5"14'-8"
14 11'-3"
15'-9"
17'-4"12'-4"
11'-6"13'
26'-10"
26'
22'-7"
16'-1"
11 12
4 23
5 14'-6"
28'-3"
32'
30'-4"
3 31'-6"
32'-6"
15 19'26'19'
19'26'19'
26'
9 12 22
4 10'-3"
4 2
2'-7"
11'-4"
8'-4"
'
5'
5'
14 13'
3'
3'
26'
6'
20'-2"
26'
5'-8"
25'
7 B-11
23-PLEX
B-10
37-PLEX
B-7
20-PLEX
G-7
6-GARAGES
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
MAINT.
24'18' 18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'
3'-6"
4'
1"=30'-0"
30' 60' 90' 0 15'
B2.10 BUILDING PLAN
WRAP NORTH
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
GROUND LEVEL
STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
PARKING DIMENSIONS
FIRE WALL
WRAP APARTMENTS
TYPE VA
R-2
72,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE 4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED
60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
PARKING STRUCTURE
OPEN PARKING
TYPE IB
S-2
UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED
18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED
180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
BUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHT
PATH OF TRAVEL
R-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.
M - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.
S-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 400' MAX
STORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF
EXIT PATH
UP
UP
5' DIA.
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
TURN
AROUND
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0" 5' DIA.
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R R R R R R R R
R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
RR
R
UP
A4
A4
A4
A4
A4
A4
A4
B4
B3
A4
6'
14'-6"
T
B3
A4
14'-6"
A5 A1
B1
B3
A5
11'
A5
A5
A5A5
44'-10"
91'-3"
114'-3"
RESIDENTIAL149 STALLS
A4
B3
A4
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
A5 A5
B1
B1
A5
B3
30"24
49 A3
30"24
49 A3
B3
B3
B1
A5
A5
A5
B3
B3
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
B4
A1
B3
A5A1
A1
A1
FITNESS
COURTYARD
POOL
COURTYARD
LV
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
B3
492'-10"
519'-7"
59' 129'-3" 44'-10" 110' 100'-2" 76'-4"
188'-4" 221'-10"
410'-2"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.
UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"
STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.
UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"
9 STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
LV
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.
UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
LV
A1
6'
STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.
UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4"
20 7'7'
7'
7'
6'
7'
30"
24 49
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
S1 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1 A6 A6S1 A6 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1 A6 A6S1 B3
A3
B3
7'
30"24
49 A3
B3
B3
A1
LV
B3
B3
B3
B3
A1
B4
ALT 2
B4
B3
B4
B3
ALT 1
A5
ALT 1
7'
B3
B3
B4
ALT 1
7'
B3
ALT 2
A5
ALT 2
7'
7'
7'
A8
3'-2 15/16"
28 28
28 28
LV
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"32
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
24'18' 18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'
3'-6"
4'
NORTH
1"=30'-0"
30' 60' 90' 0 15'
B2.11 BUILDING PLAN
WRAP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
SECOND LEVEL
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
PARKING DIMENSIONS
WRAP APARTMENTS
TYPE VA
R-2
72,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE 4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED
60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
PARKING STRUCTURE
OPEN PARKING
TYPE IB
S-2
UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED
18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED
180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
BUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHT
STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
FIRE WALL
STORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF
UP
UP
UP
5' DIA.
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
TURN
AROUND
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0" 5' DIA.
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
G
G
G
G
G
G
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R R R R R R R R
R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
RR
R
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
A4
A4
A4
A4
A4
A4
A4
B4
B3
A4
6'
14'-6"
T
B3
A4
14'-6"
A5 A1
B1
B3
A5
11'
A5
A5
A5A5
44'-10"
91'-3"
114'-3"
A4
B3
A4
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
A5 A5
B1
B1
A5
B3
30"24
49 A3
30"24
49 A3
B3
B3
B1
A5
A5
A5
B3
B3
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
B4
A1
B3
A5A1
A1
A1
FITNESS
COURTYARD
POOL
COURTYARD
LV
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
B3
492'-10"
519'-7"
59' 129'-3" 44'-10" 110' 100'-2" 76'-4"
188'-4" 221'-10"
410'-2"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.
UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.
UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.
UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"
9 STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
LV
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
LV
A1
6'
STOR.
UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.
UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4"
20 7'7'
7'
7'
6'
7'
30"
24 49
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
S1 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1 A6 A6S1 A6 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1 A6 A6S1 B3
A3
B3
7'
30"24
49 A3
B3
B3
A1
LV
B3
B3
B3
B3
A1
B4
ALT 2
B4
B3
B4
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
32 B3
ALT 1
A5
ALT 1
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
7'
B3
B3
LV
B4
ALT 1
7'
B3
ALT 2
A5
ALT 2
7' 7'
7'
A8
38 38
38 RESIDENTIAL149 STALLS
30"24
49 A3
B3
24'18' 18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'
3'-6"
4'
NORTHWRAP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
B2.12 BUILDING PLAN
THIRD LEVEL
1"=30'-0"
30' 60' 90' 0 15'
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
PARKING DIMENSIONS
WRAP APARTMENTS
TYPE VA
R-2
72,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE 4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED
60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
PARKING STRUCTURE
OPEN PARKING
TYPE IB
S-2
UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED
18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED
180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
BUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHT
STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
FIRE WALL
PATH OF TRAVEL
R-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.
M - TRAVEL DISTANCE 250' MAX.
S-2 - TRAVEL DISTANCE 400' MAX
STORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF
UP
UP
5' DIA.
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
TURN
AROUND
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0" 5' DIA.
TENANT
TRASH
ROOM
G
G
G
G
G
G
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R R R R R R R R
R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
RR
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
R R
G G
UP
A4
A4
A4
A4
A4
A4
A4
B4
B3
A4
6'
14'-6"
T
B3
A4
14'-6"
A5 A1
B1
B3
A5
A5
A5
A5A5
44'-10"
91'-3"
114'-3"
A4
B3
A4
OPEN
OPEN
A5 A5
B1
B1
A5
B3
30"24
49 A3
30"24
49 A3
B3
B3
B1
A5
A5
A5
B3
B3
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
B4
A1
B3
A5A1
A1
A1
FITNESS
COURTYARD
POOL
COURTYARD
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
B3
492'-10"
519'-7"
59' 129'-3" 44'-10" 110' 100'-2" 76'-4"
188'-4" 221'-10"
410'-2"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT3'-4" X 4'-4"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.
UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"STOR.
UNIT
3'-9" X 3'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"STOR.
UNIT
4'-2" X 3'-5"
9 STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
LV
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-8"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6" STOR.UNIT
4'-0" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"STOR.UNIT
4'-6" X 3'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
STOR.UNIT
3'-3" X 4'-6"
LV
A1
STOR.
UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4" STOR.
UNIT
5'-2" X 3'-4"
20 7'7'
7'
7'
6'
7'
30"
24 49
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
S1 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1 A6 A6S1 A6 S1A6S1 S1A6 A6S1 A6 A6S1 B3
A3
B3
7'
30"24
49 A3
B3
B3
A1
LV
B3
B3
B3
B3
A1
B4
ALT 2
B4
B3
B4
B3
ALT 1
A5
ALT 1
7'
B3
B3
7'
A5
ALT 2
7' 7'
7'
ROOF DECK
@4TH LEVEL
1,788 SQ. FT.
LV
A8
48 48
48 RESIDENTIAL149 STALLS
30"24
49 A3
B3
LV
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
3'-6" X 4'-2"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
32 STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
STOR.
UNIT
4'-0" X 4'-8"
11'
OPEN
24'18' 18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
9'
3'-6"
4'
NORTH
1"=30'-0"
30' 60' 90' 0 15'
B2.13 BUILDING PLAN
WRAP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
FOURTH LEVEL
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
PARKING DIMENSIONS
WRAP APARTMENTS
TYPE VA
R-2
72,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE 4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED
60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
PARKING STRUCTURE
OPEN PARKING
TYPE IB
S-2
UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED
18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED
180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
BUILDING TYPE AND HEIGHT
STORAGE (125 CUBIC FEET PER 1 DWELLING UNIT)
FIRE WALL
STORAGE DIMENSION : 125 CF
ROOFTOP
MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT
CONCEALED FROM
EXTERIOR VIEW BY
PERIMETER PARAPET
WALLS (TYP.)
ROOF ACCESS STAIR
ROOF ACCESS STAIR
UP
UP
UP
TURN
AROUND
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"4.0% RAMP DN @ 247' = 10'-0" UP
R
R R R R R R R R R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
RR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE
7:12SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE 7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
7:12
SLOPE
58 58
58 RESIDENTIAL156 STALLS
AC UNIT
24'18' 18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
NORTH
1"=30'-0"
30' 60' 90' 0 15'
B2.14 BUILDING PLAN
WRAP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
FIFTH LEVEL
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
PARKING DIMENSIONS
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
WRAP APARTMENTS
TYPE VA
R-2
72,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE 4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED
60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
PARKING STRUCTURE
OPEN PARKING
TYPE IB
S-2
UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED
18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED
180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
4.0% RAMP UP @ 247' = 10'-0"
TURN
AROUND
UP
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
RESIDENTIAL50 STALLS
24'18' 18'10'9'10'10'
10'9'10'10'
3RD STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
2ND STORY
T.O. PLATE
2ND STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
1ST STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1"
4TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
3RD STORY
T.O. PLATE
9'-1"
± 53'-11"
TOP OF
PARKING
STRUCTURE
9'-1"9'-1" 9'-1"
3'-6"
5TH STORY
T.O. SHT'G.
4TH STORY
T.O. PLATE
5'-6"
LINE OF SIGHT
NORTH
1"=30'-0"
30' 60' 90' 0 15'
B2.15 BUILDING PLAN
WRAP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
ROOF LEVEL
1/16"=1'-0"
16' 32' 48' 0 8'
PARKING DIMENSIONS
WRAP APARTMENTS
TYPE VA
R-2
72,000 SF ALLOWED/72,000 SF PROVIDED + FRONTAGE INCREASE AS APPLICABLE 4 STORIES ALLOWED/ 4 STORIES PROVIDED
60 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
PARKING STRUCTURE
OPEN PARKING
TYPE IB
S-2
UNLIMITED SF ALLOWED/53,000 SF PER TIER PROVIDED
18 TIERS ALLOWED/ 6 TIERS PROVIDED
180 FEET ALLOWED/ 60 FEET PROVIDED
SECTION
REF
34'-0"
20'-0"
BEDROOM
10'-2" X 10'-6"
BATH
UNIT A1
1 BEDROOM - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 634 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 56 SQ. FT.
WIC
LIVING
10'-4" X 12'-9"
BALCONY
8'-6" X 6'-6"
KITCHEN
9'-10" X 11'-8"
ENTRY
Q
DW
W/D
P
36" x 60"
L
BUILT-IN
DESK
36" H
CBCB
3S
5 MDF SH.
DW
KITCHEN
8'-0" X 15'-0"
ENTRYW/D
LIVING
12'-10" X 16'-2"
BALCONY
11'-0" X 5'-6"
BEDROOM
11'-2" X 12'-0"
REF
P
BATH
L
UNIT A3
1 BEDROOM - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 759 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 60 SQ. FT.
25'-0"
33'-0"
WIC
30"24
49 L
BUILT-IN
DESK
K
OCCURS UNDER 2 BEDROOM
CBCB
36"x60"
BUILT-IN
ISLAND
3S
37'-11"
29'-4"
BALCONY
9'-0" X 6'-2"
BATH
LIVING
11'-11" X 12'-11"
WIC
BEDROOM
11'-0" X 12'-6"
REF
KITCHEN
8'-5" X 14'-0"
DW
ENTRY
5 SHELVES
W/D
BUILT-IN
DESK
UNIT A4
1 BEDROOM - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 751 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 68 SQ. FT.
K
P
UNDER CABINET LIGHT
36"x60"
CB
CB
COUNTER
HEIGHT
CABINET
BUILT-IN
ISLAND
OPENING FOR LIGHT
COUNTER HT BASE CAB
UNDER CAB LIGHT
3S
DW
KITCHEN
10'-0" X 14'-0"
W/D
27'-0"
34'-0"
ENTRY
BEDROOM
11'-2" X 12'-0"
LIVING
11'-0" X 13'-8"
BALCONY
11'-0" X 6'-2"
FLEX/OFFICE
12'-4" X 7'-8"
BATH
REF
WIC
UNIT A5
1 BEDROOM + OFFICE - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 859 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 66 SQ. FT.
DROP ZONE
P
CB CB
K
36"x60"
BUILT-IN
ISLAND
FURNITURE
FURNITURE
DW
BATH
CB
CB
P
M. BATH
M. BEDROOM
11'-0" X 12'-0"
WIC
L
ENTRYW/D
LIVING
11'-7" X 13'-0"
BEDROOM 2
10'-4" X 12'-0"
KITCHEN
11'-8" X 9'-6"
BALCONY
5'-10" X 8'-4"
29'-10"
UNIT B1 (ADA)
2 BEDROOM - 2 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 993 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 44 SQ. FT.
FURNITURE
44'-1"
WIC
Q
REF
Q
36"x60"
36"x60"
WORK
SPACE
FURNITURE
3S
CB
KITCHEN
8'-0" X 15'-0"
M. BATH
WIC
M. BEDROOM
11'-0" X 15'-0"
L
UNIT B3
2 BEDROOM - 2 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 1,133 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 60 SQ. FT.
36'-4"
33'-0" DW
CB
ENTRYD/W
LIVING
12'-10" X 15'-9"
BALCONY
11'-0" X 5'-6"
BEDROOM 2
11'-2" X 12'-0"
REF
P
BATH 2
WIC
BUILT-IN
DESKDROP ZONE
STO.
WORK
SPACE
K
Q
L
36"x60"
36"x60"
BUILT-IN
ISLAND
FURNITURE
3S
L
COAT CLOSET
CB CB
DW
REF
P
UNIT A6
1 BEDROOM + OFFICE - 1.5 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 1004 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 69 SQ. FT.
STORAGE : -
ENTRY
LIVING
11'-10" X 15'-0"
DW
REPOSITIONABLE
ISLAND
W
REF
BEDROOM
14'-0" X 11'-2"
BALCONY
11'-0" X 6'-2"
DINING
L
ENTRY
BEDROOM
12'-0" X 12'-3"
D/W
LIVING
11'-0" X 12'-0"
FLEX/DINING
FLEX/OFFICE
9'-9" X 9'-6"
UNIT S1
STUDIO - 1 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 659 SQ. FT.
PATIO/DECK : 76 SQ. FT.
STORAGE : -
36'-10"
50'-0"
BATH
BALCONY
12'-0" X 6'-2"
RETAIL
SHAFT
WIC
BATH
P
DROP ZONE
3'-10"
K
Q
D
CB CB
P
P
36"x60"
P 36"x60"
FURNITURE
FURNITURE
FURNITURE
W/D3S
REF
CB
P
CB
M. BEDROOM
13'-0" X 12'-0"
DINING
9'-11" X 10'-6"
LIVING
14'-2" X 12'-0"
BEDROOM 2
12'-0" X 11'-0"
36'-0"
ENTRY
M. BATHWIC
L
WORK
SPACE
DW
KITCHEN
12'-10" X 9'-0"
BALCONY
8'-0" X 7'-8"
UNIT B4
2 BEDROOM - 2 BATH
NET LIVABLE: 1,261 SQ. FT.
WORK
SPACE
K
Q
BATH 2
L
WORK
SPACE 36"x60"
36"x60"
FURNITURE
FURNITURE
FURNITURE
BUILT-IN
ISLAND
B3.0 UNIT PLANS - WRAPS
3/16"=1'-0"
4' 8' 16' 0 2' 1'
4-STORY WRAP
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-12-22
JOB NO.: 2019-283
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-07-22
JOB NO.: 19-043
L7 OVERALL COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVES
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTAN/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD. & MILLIKEN AVE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 01-07-22
JOB NO.: 19-043
L8 OVERALL COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVES
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTA
Master Plan
04/27/2022
Exhibit G
SITE PLAN
N
DETAILED SITE PLAN
N
VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN
Land Use Mix
N
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN
N
SUMMARY TABLES
SITE-SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Proposed
(Master Plan)
Density 36 DU/AC
Front Setback - Foothill Boulevard Public ROW 0’ to 23’ Front Setback – Milliken Avenue Public ROW 12’ to 20’
Front Setback – Church Street Public ROW 15’ to 23’
Front Setback – Elm Avenue Public ROW 10’ to 15’
Front Setback - Interior Streets
(Applicable to all building frontages facing interior streets) 5’ to 7’ Interior Setback – West property line facing adjacent shopping center 124’ Interior Setback - South property line facing adjacent shopping center 56’ Distance Between Buildings Per Building
Code
Building Height – Walk-Ups 3 Stories
Building Height – Wrap Building 4 Stories
Landscape Area
(Overall net area) Min. 10%
Open Space Min. 150 SF/unit
(100,650 SF)
Parking RCMC Chapter
17.64 1 – Measured from Property Line. For interior streets, property line is considered to be the back of sidewalk.
PARKING
Number of
Units
Square
Footage Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Multi-Family unit (studio) 117 N/A 1.3 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 152 Multi-family unit (One bedroom) 347 N/A 1.5 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 521 Multi-family unit (Two bedrooms) 207 N/A 2 per unit (1 in garage or carport) 414 Visitor parking 671 N/A 1 per 3 units 224
Commercial (Retail) N/A 8,590 4 per 1000 square feet 34 Commercial (Restaurant) N/A 12,251 10 per 1000 square feet 123
Total Parking Spaces Required 1,468
Total Parking Spaces Provided 1,468
Total Covered Parking Spaces Required/Provided 671/942
LAND USE MIX / UNIT BREAKDOWN
Residential
Unit Type 3-Story Walk-Up 4-Story Wrap Total
Studio 84 33 117
1 Bedroom 153 194 347
2 Bedroom 86 121 207
TOTAL 323 348 671
Commercial
Commercial (SF) N/A 20,841 20,841
I' I
Exhibit H
LEGEND
- �'HN, TO l(H,t,)((il,Vf!'ltAe,!C)#l6')
- -rH10il!T06'MlDl!�T
Ill IUHt 6' TO IO' 1-1101! �T
-·- 1-"WDl!'�T
•••••••• OTl-l8t �!IIUTY •l'ITl-1&
- ""f&:l<.e,./\TI-1
'---------==
FOOTHILL BLVO,
-------- -----=--=--=--=-=--=------
HARVEST AT TERRA VISTA N/W CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD, & MILLIKEN AVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WDCC MILLIKEN WEST RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1156 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. UPLAND, CA 91786
(909) 985-0971
;,---·
\
\
,\ \ I
FOO THILL
♦
'
I '
I ' �
<;:: I" ' "'
I
"'
,.
I
"'
'
I
BLVO.
NORTH
-• ., "' ,,.
WALKWAY CIRCULATION EXHIBIT
DATE: 01�7�22
JOB NO.: 19-0--43
ARCHITECTS ORANGE
144 NORTH ORANGE ST.. ORANGE, CA 92866
(714) 639-9860
,,
L2
AO
MEMORANDUM
Date:
March 29, 2022
To: Brian Jacobson, Lewis Management Corp
From: Spencer Reed, PE and Jason Pack, PE
Subject: Harvest at Terra Vista Parking Management Plan OC22-0877
This memorandum presents the parking management plan for the Harvest at Terra Vista (Project) development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. This parking management plan was prepared based the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section
17.64.070.
Project Description
The Project is bounded by Elm Avenue to the west, Milliken Avenue to the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south, and Church Street to the north. The southwest corner of this block contains existing retail uses, including a fast-food restaurant, which are not part of the Project, but will be utilized to meet the commercial parking requirements.
The Project comprises of the following land uses:
323 three-story walk-up dwelling units
348 wrap product d
welling units
20,841 sq. f
t. of commercial space
o 8,590 sq. f
t. of retail space
o 12,251 sq. ft. of restaurant space
The
Project proposes to provide 1,310 residential parking spaces. The residential parking includes spaces for residents and guests with the use of angled and perpendicular parking on internal drive aisles, parking in private garages , and driveway spaces behind so me of the garages. The Project Exhibit J
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
provides the required number of residential park ing spaces per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.64.050.
The Project proposes to provide 85 commercial pa rking spaces in the lower level of the wrap residential parking structure and 35 parking spaces in the surface lot adjacent to the wrap building, with the remaining requirement of 37 spaces to be fulfilled by sharing surface parking with the existing commercial development. The Project also proposes to implement a parking management plan. Table 1 summarizes the proposed commercial parking supply for the Project.
The existing Terra Vista Commons commercial devel opment, which is directly adjacent to the Project site, consists of the following uses:
7,100 sq. ft. of retail space
2,790 sq. ft. of restaurant space
3,500 sq. ft. of fast-food space
It should be noted that all parcels of the existing commercial development have one owner. That owner also owns the multi-tenant commercial building. The fast food restaurant has a separate owner and a ground lease from the owner of the co mmercial center. The existing surface parking lot operates as one large shared parking pool, th e existing uses and the total parking supply are considered as one development for the purposes of this analysis. However, it should be noted that our observations indicate that the bulk of the non-utilized parking on the site consists of the exiting spaces between the McDonalds’s building and the AT&T store, north of those buildings. The existing surface parking lot contains 160 parking spaces.
Since the commercial use of the Project will have designated parking, and will be parked separately from the residential uses, the remainder of th is memorandum addresses the proposed shared parking between the existing and proposed retail on the site.
Parking Required Per City Code
Table 2 summarizes parking requirements of the commercial portion of the Project and the existing commercial development per the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.64.050. As shown in the table, a total of 157 parking spaces are expected to be required for the proposed Project’s commercial use per the City’s municipal code. Additionally, a total of 91 parking spaces are required of the existing commercial development.
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Project Shared Parking Analysis
A shared parking analysis was conducted using methodologies and assumptions provided in Shared Parking, 3 rd Edition (Urban Land Institute [ULI], 2020). Th e ULI sponsored a national study that established a basic methodolog y for analyzing parking demand in mixed-use developments and developed averages for parking rates by land us e. The analysis presen ted in this memorandum utilizes the data from the Shared Parking, 3rd Edition report.
The shared parking methodology establishes the base parking rate, park ing demand reductions, and hourly/monthly demand patterns for each land use. The overall parking demand is calculated by considering the parking deman d patterns and parking demand r eductions (potential for non- auto modes and internal capture) for each component of the project being analyzed. Information regarding the parking rates, parking demand r eductions, and pa rking demand patterns for the Project and the existing commercial development is provided below.
Parking Rates
The shared parking analysis for the Project’s commercial use utilized the City of Rancho Cucamonga parking requirements that were adjusted to match the proportions base parking rates for customers and employees as determined by UL I. Table 3 identifies the parkin g allocation of customers and employees and demonstrate s that the parking requirement fo r the commercial portion of the Project meets the City of Rancho Cucamonga parking requirement of 157 parking spaces. Table 3 also identities the parking rates developed for the existing commercial development which reflects the 91 parking space requirement.
Separate rates were used for weekday and weekend and for customers and employees. The derived rates use the daily/hourly/seasonal patterns fo r calculating the parkin g demand based on the unique travel characteristics of the project bein g analyzed. Adjustments were made for two travel factors to match the ULI shared parking methodol ogy: the potential for non-auto modes and the estimated non-captive (otherwise known as internal capture) of parking between the land uses in the area (e.g. people from the on-site residential uses accessing the retail).
Parking Demand Reductions
The shared parking analysis allows for adjustment in the base parkin g rate due to factors such as mode split/walk-in and non-captive ratio. These factors are based on the mix of uses in the project,
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
size of the uses, and location of the project. Additional information r egarding these factors is provided below.
Mode Adjustment – One factor that affects the overall park ing demand at a particular development is the number of visitors and employees that arrive by automobile. The alternatives considered in the analysis account for the effects of pedestrian, bicycle, drop- off, and transit access to the site.
Noncaptive Ratio – Also known as trip internalization. Based on data from empirical studies through sources such as ULI, it is known that a certain percentage of trips in mixed-use developments (depending on the mix of land uses in the project) are trips moving between the land uses on-site, i.e., they were internally captured on the site. Adjustments were made to the analysis to account for trip internalization.
Table 4 documents the adjustment percentages applied to custom ers and employees to each of the land uses for different periods of the day. Although Foothill Boulevard provides frequent transit opportunities to access the commercial development and increased residential development along the corridor will allow for additional pedestrian/bi cycle activity to the site, we assumed no mode split adjustment to reflect a conservative condit ion of all customers and employees driving to the site. The non-captive ratio was a pplied based on the mix and size of the uses in the Project and existing commercial development. These rati os were based on standards provided in Shared Parking, 3
rd Edition. It is assumed that some patrons will only park a vehicle once but visit multiple components of the Project and existing commercial development.
Parking Demand Patterns
The shared parking analysis uses monthly adjustment factors and time-of-day adjustment factors to account for the variation in parking demand for different land uses. Based on the anticipated land uses and parking demand redu ctions applied, monthly adjustment factors are applied based on the month that will result in the greatest parking demand (peak month). The time-of-day factors are applied to the peak month demand to deter mine the estimated parking demand throughout the day. Table 5 documents the weekday peak month adjustment and time-of-day adjustment for customers and employees. Table 6 documents the weekend peak month adjustment and time-of- day adjustment for customers and employees.
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Shared Parking Demand
Table 7 summarizes the shared parking analysis of the existing commercial development using the methodology and assumptions described above. As shown in the table, an estimated peak parking demand of 89 spaces (74 for customers and 15 for employees) will occur on a weekend at 12:00 PM in December. With inclusion of the Project an estimated peak parking demand of 240 spaces (203 for customers and 37 for em ployees) will occur on a weekend at 12:00 PM in December as documented in Table 8.
Table 9 and Table 10 present the estimated total parking demand di stribution by each land use category for weekday and weekend day, respecti vely. Figure 1 and Figu re 2 show weekday and weekend shared parking demand estimates for each month of the year. Demand for the month of December is divided into “December” and “Late December”.
Existing Parking Demand
A parking survey of the existing commercial dev elopment was conducted during the evening of March 10, 2022. Peak parking demand was found to be approximately 27 vehicles at 6:00 PM.
According to the shared parking analysis conduc ted for the existing co mmercial development, a parking demand of 69 vehicles would be expected at 6:00 PM in March. The existing site parking observations indicate half of the demand compared to what was estimated using the shared parking methodology that was adjusted to reflect City parking code requirements. Therefore, it can be assumed that the actual peak parking demand at 12:00 PM as determined in Table 7 could be lower than the 88 spaces identified and provides a conservative assessment.
Parking Supply and Demand Conclusions
The shared parking analysis of the existing co mmercial development and the commercial portion of the Project, utilizing City parking requirements, ULI parking demand reductions, and time-based demand patterns resulted in a weekday parking space demand of 235 spaces and a weekend parking space demand of 240 spaces. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section
17.64.050, the Project would require 248 parking spaces (91 for the existing commercial development and 157 for the Project). While the Project will provide less spaces than required per the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (120 pr oposed compared to 157 required), the site commercial parking supply of 280 spaces (160 existing and 120 proposed) and use of shared parking will satisfy the estimated parking demand.
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Although the shared parking assessment within the commercial portion of the Project indicates that there will be sufficient parking provided, there is the potential for parking from the residential to “spill out” into the commercial parking if parking for the entire site is not properly managed. As such, we have provided the following parking management recommendations in the following section that should be considered.
Parking Management Recommendations
The following recommendations are aimed to pr ovide an organized and systematic parking management plan for the Harvest at Terra Vista while mitigating pa rking congestion in the site’s surrounding neighborhoods. These recommendations should be continually reviewed/updated as needed to maximize the efficiency of the parking facilities if necessary.
Commercial Parking Recommendations
Commercial Parking Locations
All commercial parking will be required to park on-site in designat ed spots identified for commercial parking. These non-reserved parking sp aces will be utilized on a first come first serve basis. Commercial users are not allowed to park in residential or guest parking spaces and shall not park in nearby neighborhoods. Even if resi dential and guest parkin g spaces are unassigned, commercial users are neither allowed to utilize the unassigned resident parking spaces nor will have access to any gated resident parking area.
Static Signage
Static signage should be installed within the Project site to guide vehicles to the associated parking facilities. Signage should also be installed within the parking facilities identifying specific parking spaces or identifying the facility as commercial parking for the Project or provides time restrictions that prevents over-night parkin g within the commercial parking area. The installation of static signage can inform visitors of their parking options an d direct them to locations them may not associate with the commercial component of the Project.
Assigning Parking Locations
Assigning parking locations to commercial employees could re duce demand on desired parking spaces. Employees could be assigned to harder to find or further away commercial parking spaces to free up closer parking spaces for guests. A dditionally, assigned employee spaces could be
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
strategically located closest to the residential uses to better management potential parking spill over from the residential uses on the site.
Accommodating Transportation Network Companies
Providing dedicated pick-up and drop-off locations to Transportation Network Companies (TNC’s) such as Uber and Lyft could r educe the parking deman d. While the parking demand calculations do not consider parking deman d reductions due to alternat ive modes of transportation, encouragement of TNCs through dedicated pick -up and drop-off locati ons could result in customers choosing not to drive and park a vehicle.
Promoting Other Modes of Transportation
Encouraging the use of other modes of transportati on such as transit, bicycles, and walking could reduce parking demand. While the parking demand calculations do not consider parking demand reductions due to alternative modes of tran sportation, encouragement of these types of transportation options through improving transit stops, bicycle parking, or sidewalk improvements could result in customers choosing not to drive and park a vehicle.
Residential Parking Recommendations
Resident Parking Location
All residents and their guests will be required to park on site in designated residential parking spaces. Only residents and their guests with be granted access to the residential parking areas.
Guest Parking Location
Guest parking will be available on a first-come, first-served basis within the residential community.
With appropriate registration, guests will be allowed to park in any unmarked, unassigned residential parking space. Guests are not allowed to park in commercial parking spaces and shall not park in nearby neighborhoods.
Register Vehicles with Management
All resident vehicles will be required to be regi stered with building management as part of their lease agreement. Only those registered vehicles will be allowed to park within the community.
Management staff will monitor the amount of resident parking spaces that are available. Units will not be leased to tenants if a potential tenant has more vehicles than spaces allotted for their unit.
Brian Jacobson
March 29, 2022
Assigned Vehicle Parking
All resident vehicles will be assigned a specific parking spot that is numbered and reserved for the specific vehicles use only. Parking spaces are assigned to one (1) specific resident vehicle only and are not able to be shared with other resident or guest vehicles. If a tenant’s vehicle information should change, it is the responsibility of the tenant to notify management in accordance with the lease agreement.
Security / Monitoring
Management staff and security personnel will be on-site daily from 8am- 2:30am to monitor and enforce compliance with the requirements of the Parking Management Plan and the requirements set for in the tenants’ lease agreements. Cameras will be also be utilized to monitor the parking areas. Any violation of the parking requirements se t forth in the tenants’ lease agreements will be subject to towing, revoked parking privileges, and/or eviction.
Management staff will employ parking enforc ement software to enforce parking rules.
Management staff will also review potential parkin g spill-over into adjacent areas through review of security footage and/or site observations.
Maximum Number of Vehicles & Monitoring
A maximum total number of vehicles will be allowed per apartment, with the below requirements:
Maximum of 1 parking space for a studio or 1-bedroom apartment Maximum of 2 parking spaces for a 2-bedroom apartment The number of remaining parking spaces availabl e at the property will be monitored during lease up and stabilization. If there are not a sufficient number of available spaces for a potential resident’s vehicles, a lease will not be executed for that prospective tenant.
Additional Parking Language
The parking rules will include the below requirements:
All resident vehicles must be registered with management No unregistered vehicles shall be parked on site
Open parking shall be on a first-come, first-serve basis Residents with an assigned parking space shall only park in that space, and shall not share the parking space with any other vehicle