Agenda packet, regular meeting — Rancho Cucamonga City Council, April 16, 2025 (part 1 of 4)

CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”

Page 1 ends

Mayor
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor Pro Tem
Lynne B. Kennedy
Members of the City
Council:

Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
Ashley Stickler

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
April 16, 2025
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY –

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY

CLOSED SESSION

REGULAR MEETINGS

TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.

The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It is the intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Services Department at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). For City Council Rules of Decorum refer to Resolution No. 2023-086.

Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available in the City Clerk Services Department during normal business hours at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas.

CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.

TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES

DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, MATT BURRIS,

DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND JEVIN KAYE, FINANCE DIRECTOR; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274 AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. (CITY)
E. RECESS

Page 2 ends

REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Rancho Cucamonga’s 2024 Volunteers and Proclamation Declaring the Week of April 20-26, 2025 as National Volunteer Week.

B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to San Bernardino County Children’s Network Declaring April 2025 as Child Abuse Prevention Month.

B3. Recognition of Rancho Cucamonga Edison Scholar David Kwon from Los Osos High School who was Awarded a $50,000 College Scholarship from Southern California Edison (SCE).

C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits us from addressing any issue not on the Agenda. Testimony may be received and referred to staff or scheduled for a future meeting.

Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes per individual. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, disorderly or boisterous conduct that disturbs, disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. For more information, refer to the City Council Rules of Decorum and Order (Resolution No. 2023-086) located in the back of the Council Chambers.

The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.

Page 3 ends

CONSENT CALENDARS:

The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.

Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar.

D. CONSENT CALENDAR
D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of April 2, 2025 and Special Meeting of April 8, 2025.

D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,290,220.99 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $7,300,824.37 Dated March 26, 2025, Through April 6, 2025. (CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $37,750.31 Dated March 26, 2025, Through April 6, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
D4. Consideration to Declare Surplus for Vehicle, Retired Computer, Monitors, Laptops, iPhones, and iPads, Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus. (CITY) D5. Consideration to Schedule a Public Hearing for Placement of Liens and Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (CITY)
D6. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. for the Creation of Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Suggested Routes Maps in the Amount of $159,000, Including a 5% Contingency. (CITY)
D7. Consideration of an Appropriation from Fund 174 (Gas Tax R&T7360) in the Amount of $360,000, Award of a Professional Services Agreement with Roadway Asset Services in the Amount of $195,190 for Consulting Services for Preparation of a Pavement Management Plan, and Authorization for the City Engineer to Approve the Use of an Additional $164,780 for Optional Services and Contingency as Deemed Necessary. This Project is Exempt From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)
D8. Consideration of a Contract with UPSCO for Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) Maintenance Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $20,000 in FY24/25 and $220,000 Over Seven Years. (CITY) D9. Consideration to Award a Contract with CT&T Concrete Paving Inc., in the Amount of $1,655,100, Plus a 15% Contingency for the Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project. Consideration to Accept Award in the Amount of $750,000 from San Bernardino County through the County Board Discretionary Fund Priorities Program, and to Authorize an Appropriation in the Amount of $750,000. This Project is Exempt From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)
D10. Consideration of a Contract with American Asphalt South, Inc. in the Amount of $349,400 Plus a 10% Contingency for Construction and Construction Management and Inspection Services, for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project. This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)

Page 4 ends

D11. Consideration to Accept All Improvements as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention for the RCMU Electric Vehicle Charging Station Hub. This Project is Exempt from All Appropriate National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review as Required by the Department of Energy and CEQA Guidelines. (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
F1. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1039, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Adding Chapter 10.84 to Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Regulating the Use of Bicycles and E-Conveyances in Public Areas. (ORDINANCE NO. 1039) (CITY) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Public Hearing for Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-010, A Resolution of the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study for the Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee, Library Impact Fee, Animal Center Impact Fee, Police Impact Fee, Park Impact Fees and Fire Impact Fee , Adopting Capital Improvement Programs as Part of the Nexus Study, Updating and Establishing the Fee Amounts for Such Development Impact Fees, and Making a Determination of Exemption Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1038, to Be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, An Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Adding Chapter 3.80 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Establishing a Development Impact Fee for Fire Impacts of Residential and Business Development, Amending Chapter 3.68 to Remove References to Quimby Act in Lieu Fees, and Making a Determination of Exemption from the CEQA. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-010) (ORDINANCE NO. 1038) (CITY)
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1. Presentation on the California Cross Connection Control Policy Handbook and Implications for Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems. (Verbal Report) (CITY)
H2. PathwaysRC – A Plan to Develop Pathways to Public Service. (CITY) H3. Consideration of a Contract With Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the Amount of $7,647,890, Plus a 10% Contingency for the Advanced Traffic Management System Phase II Project and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $831,930. This Project is Exempt From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2. INTERAGENCY UPDATES
(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)

Page 5 ends

J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
L. ADJOURNMENT

CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.

LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC

CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 774-2023. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. *DRAFT*
April 2, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 6
April 2, 2025

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Closed Session on Wednesday, April 2, 2025, in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM.

Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Absent: Council Member Ashley Stickler.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development, Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs and Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager of Administrative Services.

A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN

RESOURCES DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY

MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, MATT BURRIS, DEPUTY CITY

MANAGER/ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND JEVIN KAYE, FINANCE DIRECTOR; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING

LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. (CITY)
D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229-012-08- 0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS ADDRESS 8434 ROCHESTER AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730; NEGOTIATING PARTIES MATT MARQUEZ, DIRECTOR OF

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND RICHARD LEE, REPRESENTING CBRE GROUP, INC., REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY)
E. RECESS
The closed session recessed at 6:27 p.m.

Page 6 ends

*DRAFT*
April 2, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 6
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on April 2, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.

Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L.

Dennis Michael. Absent: Council Member Ashley Stickler.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director.

Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy led the Pledge of Allegiance.

A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
None.

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to OneLegacy Declaring the Month of April 2025 as Donate Life Month.

Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council recognized the month of April 2025 as Donate Life Month and presented a Proclamation to OneLegacy Ambassadors: Cheryl Machan and Donna Hansen.

C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Erika Hernandez, spoke about a recent shooting incident in her neighborhood near Carleton P. Lightfoot Elementary School and shared public safety concerns regarding burglaries in homes along the Pacific Electric Trail.

Michelle Reinhart, spoke of the dangers of smoking, vaping and how secondhand exposure to both smoke and vape aerosols poses health risks for the community. She advocated for smoke free policies and stronger regulations in the City.

Michael Reinhart, spoke about underage Vape and Tobacco sales and shared public health concerns.

In response to public comment, City Manager Gillison thanked the speakers for their advocacy efforts and concerns on the topic. Mr. Gillison referred speakers to Healthy RC staff and noted the city’s General Plan has a policy regarding smoking and vaping.

Page 7 ends

*DRAFT*
April 2, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 6
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Scott announced that she will need to abstain on item D3, due to a potential conflict of interest as her employer is Southern California Gas Company.

D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Special and Regular Meetings of March 19, 2025.

D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,389,108.47 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $3,770,492.59 Dated March 10, 2025, Through March 25, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
D3. Consideration to Approve Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $330.23 Dated March 10, 2025, Through March 25, 2025. (FIRE)
D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of February 28, 2025 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)
D5. Consideration of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with On Duty Health, PLLC for Health and Fitness Assessments in the Amount of $32,790 Annually. (FIRE)
D6. Consideration to Approve a Four-Year Agreement with Sidepath Inc. in the Amount of $620,760 for Network Equipment License and Support. (CITY/FIRE) D7. Consideration of the Cooperative Purchase of One (1) PB Loader B-6 Asphalt Patcher via the Sourcewell Contract Number 080521-PBL from Nixon-Egli Equipment Co. in the Amount of $441,243.88. (CITY)
D8. Consideration to Approve an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Public Improvements, to Approve the Plans and Specifications for the Related Public Improvements, and to Approve a Resolution Ordering the Annexation into Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 Related to Case No. DRC2020-00438, Located on the Southeast Corner of East Avenue and Banyan Street (Project). The Project Has Been Determined by Staff to Be Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-011) (CITY)
MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve Consent Calendar agenda items D1 through D8 with Council Member/Board Member Scott abstaining on item D3. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Council Member Stickler.

Page 8 ends

*DRAFT*
April 2, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 6
E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION E1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:

ORDINANCE NO. 1037

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.38 TO TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE

CONCERNING THE PROHIBITION AGAINST CAMPING ON PUBLIC PROPERTY OR

INTERFERENCE WITH THE USE OF PUBLIC PROPERTY INCLUDING PUBLIC ACCESS
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1037 by title only.

Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 1037.

VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1037 by title only. Motion carried 4-0-1.

Absent: Council Member Stickler.

F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)
None.

G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Public Hearing for Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-010, A Resolution of the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Development Impact Fee Nexus Studies, Adopting Capital Improvement Programs as Part of the Nexus Studies, Updating and Establishing the Fee Amounts for the City’s Development Impact Fees, and Making a Determination of Exemption Under CEQA and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1038, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, An Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Adding Chapter 3.80 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Establishing a Development Impact Fee for Fire Impacts of Residential and Business Development, Amending Chapter 3.68 to Remove References to Quimby Act in Lieu Fees, and Making a Determination of Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-010 ) (ORDINANCE NO. 1038 ) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced item G1 and informed staff met with representatives of the Building Industry of America (BIA) and several developers actively working in the City. He noted the BIA and the developers have asked for clarifying information related to the proposed adjustments to the Transportation Development Impact Fee schedule, the Non-Transportation Development Impact Fees, and Nexus Studies. He stated that in order to fully address these questions, staff is recommending that the public hearing for the Non-Transportation Development Impact Fees and Nexus Study be continued to April 16, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. and that the Transportation Development Impact Fees and Nexus Study be continued to May 7, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. Lastly, Mr. Gillison informed three (3) letters were received: one (1) by the Desert Valleys Builders Association (DVBA) and two (2) by the Building Industry Association of Southern California, Inc. Copies of the correspondence received were provided to the City Council and were available for the public to review and on the City’s website.

Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.

Page 9 ends

*DRAFT*
April 2, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 6
Bret Ilich, Building Industry Association of Southern California, spoke in support of continuing the public hearing to allow the City and stakeholders such as the Building Industry Association of Southern California sufficient time to discuss the item.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to continue the public hearing on the Non-Transportation Development Impact Fees and Nexus Study to April 16, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. and the Transportation Development Impact Fees and Nexus Study to May 7, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Motion carried 4-0-1.

Absent: Council Member Stickler.

H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)
H1. Consideration to Receive and File the Midyear Financial Update for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 and Approve Various Appropriations and Related Actions. (CITY/FIRE) City Manager Gillison introduced Rick Flinchum, Finance Manager, who gave the Staff Report along with a Power Point presentation for item H1.

City Manager Gillison spoke about the substantial financial impact and expenses associated with the January 2025 Wind Event. He highlighted items to monitor in the upcoming months including revenue from property taxes, tourism, discretionary spending and travel as it is a significant part of the city’s economy.

Mayor Michael thanked staff for the comprehensive presentation.

MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to receive and file the Midyear Financial Update for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 and Approve Various Appropriations and Related Actions. Motion carried 4-0-1. Absent: Council Member Stickler.

I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Hutchison announced the City Council attended the Grand Opening of the Sanctity Hotel earlier that day and noted it is the first luxury boutique hotel in the Inland Empire offering panoramic mountain views and exquisite dining at Durango Cocina & Rooftop Bar.

I2. INTERAGENCY UPDATES
Mayor Michael reported his attendance earlier that day as a Board Member of the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). He informed Executive Director, Dr. Raymond Wolfe, announced his retirement after 12 years of dedicated service and that the Board of Directors took action earlier that day to approve the appointment of Carrie Schindler, Deputy Executive Director, to the position of Executive Director.

J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
City Attorney Ghirelli noted that there was no reportable action taken during Closed Session held earlier that evening.

Page 10 ends

L. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael adjourned the Council Meeting at 7:42 p.m.

Approved:

Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director

Page 11 ends

*DRAFT*
April 8, 2025 | City Council Special Meeting Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 1
April 8, 2025

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
The City Council held a Special Meeting Workshop on Tuesday, April 8, 2025 at the Black Box Theater, 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m.

CALL TO ORDER
Present were Council Members Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy, and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development, Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs and Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager of Administrative Services.

A. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
No public communications.

B. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION
B1. Annual City Council Review and Development of New Goals, Team Building Workshop and Related Legislative Matters. (CITY)
The meeting recessed at 11:20 p.m. for lunch; reconvened at 12:55 p.m. All Members were present.

C. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 2:25 p.m.

Approved:

Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director

Page 12 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,290,220.99 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $7,300,824.37 Dated March 26, 2025, Through April 6, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,297,705.78 and $992,515.21 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $6,490,770.55 and $810,053.82 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.

BACKGROUND:

N/A
ANALYSIS:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register

Page 13 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 1 of 15 ends

Company: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Payment Date On or After: 03/26/2025
Payment Date On or Before: 04/06/2025
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Westbound
Communications Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451153 03/26/2025 Westbound
Communications Inc
16,506.66 0 16,506.66
Supplier Payment: Only Cremations
For Pets Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451120 03/26/2025 Only Cremations For Pets
Inc
1,252.00 0 1,252.00
Supplier Payment: Omnium Circus:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451119 03/26/2025 Omnium Circus 32,000.00 0 32,000.00
Supplier Payment: Scl: 03/26/2025 Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451130 03/26/2025 Scl 0 2,641.65 2,641.65
Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451058 03/26/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 334.71 0 334.71
Supplier Payment: Consolidated
Electrical Distr Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Consolidated Electrical
Distr Inc
609.17 0 609.17
Supplier Payment: Best Outdoor
Power Inland Llc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Best Outdoor Power Inland
Llc
902.75 0 902.75
Supplier Payment: Cintas
Corporation: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451074 03/26/2025 Cintas Corporation 1,151.90 0 1,151.90 Supplier Payment: Cal Quest
Investigations: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451071 03/26/2025 Cal Quest Investigations 3,277.91 0 3,277.91 Supplier Payment: Daniels Tire
Service: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451084 03/26/2025 Daniels Tire Service 0 4,530.96 4,530.96 Supplier Payment: Pedrag V. Pecic:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Pedrag V. Pecic 3,000.00 0 3,000.00
Supplier Payment: Bishop Company:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451064 03/26/2025 Bishop Company 694.87 0 694.87
Supplier Payment: ADP, Inc.:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451055 03/26/2025 ADP, Inc. 613.20 0 613.20
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Napa Auto Parts 686.65 0 686.65
Supplier Payment: Rio Hondo
Community College District:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451126 03/26/2025 Rio Hondo Community
College District
118.55 0 118.55
Supplier Payment: Adapt Consulting
Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451053 03/26/2025 Adapt Consulting Inc 1,114.10 0 1,114.10 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 14 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 2 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co
Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451098 03/26/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 196.11 0 196.11
Supplier Payment: Carrot-Top
Industries Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451072 03/26/2025 Carrot-Top Industries Inc 541.28 0 541.28 Supplier Payment: Sovic Creative:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Sovic Creative 4,500.00 0 4,500.00
Supplier Payment: Enko Systems
Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451087 03/26/2025 Enko Systems Inc 488.06 0 488.06
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451118 03/26/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 1,170.10 0 1,170.10 Supplier Payment: Fehr & Peers:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Fehr & Peers 29,128.00 0 29,128.00
Supplier Payment: Toro Towing:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451139 03/26/2025 Toro Towing 1,200.00 0 1,200.00
Supplier Payment: Brinks
Incorporated: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Brinks Incorporated 2,806.11 0 2,806.11
Supplier Payment: Babcock
Laboratories Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451063 03/26/2025 Babcock Laboratories Inc 654.70 0 654.70 Supplier Payment: Collins & Collins
Llp: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451078 03/26/2025 Collins & Collins Llp 1,114.49 0 1,114.49 Supplier Payment: Fuel Serv:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451094 03/26/2025 Fuel Serv 4,657.72 0 4,657.72
Supplier Payment: Gentry General
Engineering Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Gentry General
Engineering Inc
1,490.76 0 1,490.76
Supplier Payment: Aufbau
Corporation: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Aufbau Corporation 27,695.00 0 27,695.00
Supplier Payment: Executive Detail
Services: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451088 03/26/2025 Executive Detail Services 0 770.00 770.00 Supplier Payment: Rdo Equipment
Company: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Rdo Equipment Company 4,161.69 0 4,161.69
Supplier Payment: Lilburn
Corporation: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451105 03/26/2025 Lilburn Corporation 1,315.50 0 1,315.50 Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors
Ontario Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451077 03/26/2025 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 751.18 0 751.18 Supplier Payment: Intervet Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451101 03/26/2025 Intervet Inc 2,693.75 0 2,693.75
Supplier Payment: Wilson & Bell
Auto Service: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451156 03/26/2025 Wilson & Bell Auto Service 7,336.10 0 7,336.10 Supplier Payment: Dance Terrific:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451083 03/26/2025 Dance Terrific 369.60 0 369.60
Supplier Payment: Read The Books:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451125 03/26/2025 Read The Books 1,070.00 0 1,070.00

Page 15 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 3 of 15 ends

90.10 0 90.10
Supplier Payment: Mediwaste
Disposal Llc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451108 03/26/2025 Mediwaste Disposal Llc 40.25 0 40.25
Supplier Payment: Pfm Asset
Management Llc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Pfm Asset Management
Llc
18,496.49 0 18,496.49
Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary
Supply: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451152 03/26/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 3,509.62 0 3,509.62 Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451117 03/26/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 0 66.76 66.76 Supplier Payment: Crafco Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Crafco Inc 1,051.43 0 1,051.43
Supplier Payment: Adobe Animal
Hospital: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451054 03/26/2025 Adobe Animal Hospital 500.00 0 500.00 Supplier Payment: Bound Tree
Medical Llc: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451066 03/26/2025 Bound Tree Medical Llc 0 2,146.08 2,146.08 Supplier Payment: Mariposa
Landscapes Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 209,653.45 0 209,653.45 Supplier Payment: Crown Pointe
Investigations Llc: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451081 03/26/2025 Crown Pointe
Investigations Llc
0 26,000.00 26,000.00
Supplier Payment: California State
Controller: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451068 03/26/2025 California State Controller 4,784.74 0 4,784.74

Page 16 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 4 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Unity Courier
Service Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451144 03/26/2025 Unity Courier Service Inc 662.02 0 662.02 Supplier Payment: Marjani Builders,
INC.: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Marjani Builders, INC. 143,497.50 0 143,497.50 Supplier Payment: Kola-Fm:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451102 03/26/2025 Kola-Fm 1,500.00 0 1,500.00
Supplier Payment: Merrimac
Petroleum Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 37,635.05 0 37,635.05 Supplier Payment: Siteone
Landscape Supply Llc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451132 03/26/2025 Siteone Landscape Supply
Llc
829.38 0 829.38
Supplier Payment: O S T S Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451122 03/26/2025 O S T S Inc 2,745.00 0 2,745.00
Supplier Payment: Able Building
Maintenance: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451051 03/26/2025 Able Building Maintenance 4,818.00 0 4,818.00 Supplier Payment: Autolift Services
Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451062 03/26/2025 Autolift Services Inc 2,178.43 0 2,178.43 Supplier Payment: Covetrus North
America: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451080 03/26/2025 Covetrus North America 520.46 0 520.46 Supplier Payment: Ontario Spay &
Neuter Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451121 03/26/2025 Ontario Spay & Neuter Inc 2,900.00 0 2,900.00 Supplier Payment: Virtual Project
Manager Llc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451149 03/26/2025 Virtual Project Manager Llc 500.00 0 500.00 Supplier Payment: Factory Motor
Parts: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451090 03/26/2025 Factory Motor Parts 0 1,052.65 1,052.65 Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Data Ticket Inc 3,278.18 0 3,278.18
Supplier Payment: Marisa MaverhanLane: 03/26/2025City of Rancho Cucamonga
451107 03/26/2025 Marisa Maverhan-Lane 4,200.00 0 4,200.00 Supplier Payment: Allstar Fire
Equipment Inc: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
03/26/2025 Allstar Fire Equipment Inc 0 24,741.56 24,741.56 Supplier Payment: Leighton
Consulting Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451103 03/26/2025 Leighton Consulting Inc 19,796.50 0 19,796.50 Supplier Payment: Abound Food
Care: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451052 03/26/2025 Abound Food Care 3,278.35 0 3,278.35
Supplier Payment: Underground
Service Alert/Sc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451143 03/26/2025 Underground Service
Alert/Sc
150.60 0 150.60
Supplier Payment: First Aid 2000:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451092 03/26/2025 First Aid 2000 3,462.27 0 3,462.27
Supplier Payment: Dunn-Edwards
Corporation: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 501.43 0 501.43

Page 17 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 5 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Fire Apparatus
Solutions: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451091 03/26/2025 Fire Apparatus Solutions 0 3,790.28 3,790.28 Supplier Payment: Henry Schein Inc:
03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451097 03/26/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 996.45 996.45
Supplier Payment: Vortex Industries
Llc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451151 03/26/2025 Vortex Industries Llc 825.00 0 825.00 Supplier Payment: Lozano Smith Llp:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451106 03/26/2025 Lozano Smith Llp 585.00 0 585.00
Supplier Payment: Torti Gallas &
Partners Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451140 03/26/2025 Torti Gallas & Partners Inc 343.75 0 343.75 Supplier Payment: Nbs: 03/26/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451114 03/26/2025 Nbs 5,130.00 0 5,130.00
Supplier Payment: Richards Watson
& Gershon: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
1,600.00 0 1,600.00
Supplier Payment: Advanced
Chemical Transport Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451056 03/26/2025 Advanced Chemical
Transport Inc
868.50 0 868.50
Supplier Payment: Zumar Industries
Inc.: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451157 03/26/2025 Zumar Industries Inc. 2,333.11 0 2,333.11 Supplier Payment: Paymentus
Corporation: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Paymentus Corporation 1,384.00 0 1,384.00
Supplier Payment: Humane Society
Of San Bernardino Valley:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451099 03/26/2025 Humane Society Of San
Bernardino Valley
200.00 0 200.00
Supplier Payment: Cobra
Professionals, INC.: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
03/26/2025 Cobra Professionals, INC. 0 166.90 166.90
Supplier Payment: Mesa Energy
Systems Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451109 03/26/2025 Mesa Energy Systems Inc 21,774.34 0 21,774.34 Supplier Payment: Towill Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451141 03/26/2025 Towill Inc 9,345.00 0 9,345.00
Supplier Payment: Experian:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451089 03/26/2025 Experian 50.00 0 50.00
Supplier Payment: Universal Fleet
Supply: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451145 03/26/2025 Universal Fleet Supply 0 84.01 84.01
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451136 03/26/2025 Southern California Edison 6,782.17 0 6,782.17 Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange
County Janitorial Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451073 03/26/2025 Ccs Orange County
Janitorial Inc
370.58 0 370.58
Supplier Payment: Demco Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451085 03/26/2025 Demco Inc 187.68 0 187.68

Page 18 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 6 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Archibald Pet
Hospital: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451061 03/26/2025 Archibald Pet Hospital 800.00 0 800.00 Supplier Payment: Brodart Co:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451067 03/26/2025 Brodart Co 29,539.76 0 29,539.76
Supplier Payment: Scott Mcleod
Plumbing Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451131 03/26/2025 Scott Mcleod Plumbing Inc 7,753.34 0 7,753.34 Supplier Payment: Bordin Semmer
Llp: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451065 03/26/2025 Bordin Semmer Llp 890.00 0 890.00
Supplier Payment: Willdan Group:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451155 03/26/2025 Willdan Group 1,311.21 0 1,311.21
Supplier Payment: The Sign Shop:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451137 03/26/2025 The Sign Shop 32.33 0 32.33
Supplier Payment: Tirehub Llc:
03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451138 03/26/2025 Tirehub Llc 0 878.82 878.82
Supplier Payment: Verizon Wireless -
La: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451147 03/26/2025 Verizon Wireless - La 8,771.78 0 8,771.78 Supplier Payment: Rancho Smog
Center: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451124 03/26/2025 Rancho Smog Center 49.95 0 49.95
Supplier Payment: MNS Engineers,
Inc.: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451111 03/26/2025 MNS Engineers, Inc. 15,437.50 0 15,437.50 Supplier Payment: Cobra
Professionals, INC.: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Cobra Professionals, INC. 423.20 0 423.20
Supplier Payment: Life-Assist Inc:
03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
03/26/2025 Life-Assist Inc 0 2,775.43 2,775.43
Supplier Payment: Nv5 Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451116 03/26/2025 Nv5 Inc 7,546.30 0 7,546.30
Supplier Payment: General Code Llc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451095 03/26/2025 General Code Llc 636.00 0 636.00
Supplier Payment: Motive Energy
Llc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451112 03/26/2025 Motive Energy Llc 541.92 0 541.92
Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal
Health: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451113 03/26/2025 Mwi Animal Health 1,132.02 0 1,132.02 Supplier Payment: Advantage
Sealing Systems Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451057 03/26/2025 Advantage Sealing
Systems Inc
496.30 0 496.30
Supplier Payment: Calif Underground
Fac Safe Excavation Board:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451069 03/26/2025 Calif Underground Fac
Safe Excavation Board

56.32 0 56.32
Supplier Payment: Civic Solutions
Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Civic Solutions Inc 16,058.75 0 16,058.75
Supplier Payment: Anderson'S
Playschool: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Anderson'S Playschool 6,075.00 0 6,075.00

Page 19 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 7 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Mc Avoy &
Markham Engineering and Sales CO:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Mc Avoy & Markham
Engineering and Sales CO
1,712.90 0 1,712.90
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451129 03/26/2025 San Bernardino County 15,835.84 0 15,835.84 Supplier Payment: Dependable
Break Room Solutions Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451086 03/26/2025 Dependable Break Room
Solutions Inc

58.90 0 58.90
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451093 03/26/2025 Frontier Comm 0 1,951.94 1,951.94
Supplier Payment: Midwest
Veterinary Supply Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451110 03/26/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply
Inc
962.77 0 962.77
Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric
Company Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Graybar Electric Company
Inc
1,061.36 0 1,061.36
Supplier Payment: Champion Fire
Systems Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Champion Fire Systems
Inc
7,297.34 0 7,297.34
Supplier Payment: Grainger:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451096 03/26/2025 Grainger 2,795.03 0 2,795.03
Supplier Payment: Ruben'S Auto
Collision Center Inc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451127 03/26/2025 Ruben'S Auto Collision
Center Inc
2,411.98 0 2,411.98
Supplier Payment: Pro Spray
Equipment: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451123 03/26/2025 Pro Spray Equipment 1,143.94 0 1,143.94 Supplier Payment: Life On a Lens
Media, LLC: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451104 03/26/2025 Life On a Lens Media, LLC 500.00 0 500.00 Supplier Payment: Nick Barbieri
Trucking Llc: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451115 03/26/2025 Nick Barbieri Trucking Llc 1,278.41 0 1,278.41 Supplier Payment: Circlepoint:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451076 03/26/2025 Circlepoint 1,200.00 0 1,200.00
Supplier Payment: Cintas
Corporation: 03/26/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451075 03/26/2025 Cintas Corporation 0 117.72 117.72
Supplier Payment: Diamond
Environmental Services: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Diamond Environmental
Services
814.85 0 814.85
Supplier Payment: Calamp Wireless
Networks Corp: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Calamp Wireless Networks
Corp
250.00 0 250.00
Supplier Payment: Aquabio
Environmental Technologies Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451060 03/26/2025 Aquabio Environmental
Technologies Inc
1,742.94 0 1,742.94
Supplier Payment: Johnny Allen
Tennis Academy: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Johnny Allen Tennis
Academy
1,675.20 0 1,675.20
Supplier Payment: Victoria Animal
Hospital: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451148 03/26/2025 Victoria Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00

Page 20 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 8 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Cal Poly Pomona:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451070 03/26/2025 Cal Poly Pomona 6,825.00 0 6,825.00
Supplier Payment: D & K Concrete
Company: 03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451082 03/26/2025 D & K Concrete Company 1,605.48 0 1,605.48 Supplier Payment: Vista Paint:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451150 03/26/2025 Vista Paint 1,569.55 0 1,569.55
Supplier Payment: Apx Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451059 03/26/2025 Apx Inc 2,437.93 0 2,437.93
Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/26/2025 Psa Print Group 378.00 0 378.00
Supplier Payment: Safe Software Inc:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451128 03/26/2025 Safe Software Inc 3,480.00 0 3,480.00 Supplier Payment: Verizon:
03/26/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451146 03/26/2025 Verizon 57.44 0 57.44
Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal
Health: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451199 03/27/2025 Mwi Animal Health 1,260.37 0 1,260.37 Supplier Payment: Richards Watson
& Gershon: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/27/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
24,220.60 0 24,220.60
Supplier Payment: Ewing Irrigation
Products Inc: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451187 03/27/2025 Ewing Irrigation Products
Inc
1,560.59 0 1,560.59
Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
03/27/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451178 03/27/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 0 443.59 443.59
Supplier Payment: Merakai LLC:
03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451195 03/27/2025 Merakai LLC 8,160.13 0 8,160.13
Supplier Payment: Occupational
Health Centers Of Ca: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451200 03/27/2025 Occupational Health
Centers Of Ca
1,372.00 0 1,372.00
Supplier Payment: Globalstar Usa:
03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451189 03/27/2025 Globalstar Usa 182.15 0 182.15
Supplier Payment: Dudek:
03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451185 03/27/2025 Dudek 3,012.50 0 3,012.50
Supplier Payment: Elecnor Belco
Electric Inc: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/27/2025 Elecnor Belco Electric Inc 39,220.75 0 39,220.75 Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc:
03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/27/2025 Data Ticket Inc 200.00 0 200.00
Supplier Payment: Hdl Software Llc:
03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451191 03/27/2025 Hdl Software Llc 20,217.36 0 20,217.36 Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths
Inc: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/27/2025 Abc Locksmiths Inc 123.65 0 123.65
Supplier Payment: Mrc Smart
Technology Solutions: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451197 03/27/2025 Mrc Smart Technology
Solutions
1,233.74 0 1,233.74
Supplier Payment: Transtech
Engineers Inc: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451207 03/27/2025 Transtech Engineers Inc 554.00 0 554.00

Page 21 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 9 of 15 ends

58.72 0 58.72
Supplier Payment: Ferguson
Enterprises Llc #1350: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451188 03/27/2025 Ferguson Enterprises Llc
#1350
887.39 0 887.39
Supplier Payment: Life-Assist Inc:
03/27/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
03/27/2025 Life-Assist Inc 0 1,695.17 1,695.17
Supplier Payment: Department Of
Justice: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451183 03/27/2025 Department Of Justice 2,240.00 0 2,240.00 Supplier Payment: Mcfadden-Dale
Hardware: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451194 03/27/2025 Mcfadden-Dale Hardware 199.99 0 199.99 Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials
Company: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451208 03/27/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 177.78 0 177.78 Supplier Payment: Bound Tree
Medical Llc: 03/27/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451180 03/27/2025 Bound Tree Medical Llc 0 910.22 910.22 Supplier Payment: Scott Mcleod
Plumbing Inc: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451205 03/27/2025 Scott Mcleod Plumbing Inc 12,270.00 0 12,270.00 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Transportation Authority:
03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451204 03/27/2025 San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority
56,441.00 0 56,441.00

Page 22 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 10 of 15 ends

81.85 0 81.85
Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co
Inc: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451193 03/27/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 2,336.02 0 2,336.02 Supplier Payment: Henry Schein Inc:
03/27/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451192 03/27/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 1,202.38 1,202.38
Supplier Payment: EN Engineering,
LLC: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451186 03/27/2025 EN Engineering, LLC 30,150.03 0 30,150.03 Supplier Payment: Cintas
Corporation: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451181 03/27/2025 Cintas Corporation 3,247.71 0 3,247.71 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Sheriff'S Dept: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
03/27/2025 San Bernardino County
Sheriff'S Dept
4,260,140.00 0 4,260,140.00
Supplier Payment: Mr T'S Towing
Inc: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451198 03/27/2025 Mr T'S Towing Inc 330.00 0 330.00
Supplier Payment: Rainbow Bolt &
Supply Inc: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451203 03/27/2025 Rainbow Bolt & Supply Inc 1,226.42 0 1,226.42 Supplier Payment: Pape Material
Handling: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451201 03/27/2025 Pape Material Handling 86.87 0 86.87
Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary
Supply: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451209 03/27/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 790.35 0 790.35 Supplier Payment: Zumar Industries
Inc.: 03/27/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451210 03/27/2025 Zumar Industries Inc. 825.76 0 825.76 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
04/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451217 04/01/2025 Frontier Comm 0 697.61 697.61
Supplier Payment: Amg & Associates
Inc: 04/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
04/01/2025 Amg & Associates Inc 0 347,714.92 347,714.92 Supplier Payment: C V W D:
04/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451215 04/01/2025 C V W D 16,880.88 0 16,880.88
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 04/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451218 04/01/2025 Southern California Edison 1,936.31 0 1,936.31 Supplier Payment: C V W D:
04/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451214 04/01/2025 C V W D 0 52.26 52.26
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
04/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451216 04/01/2025 Frontier Comm 3,454.70 0 3,454.70
Supplier Payment: South Coast
Aqmd: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451266 04/02/2025 South Coast Aqmd 0 165.96 165.96

Page 23 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 11 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Sovic Creative:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Sovic Creative 1,500.00 0 1,500.00
Supplier Payment: Western Systems
Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451277 04/02/2025 Western Systems Inc 1,969.95 0 1,969.95 Supplier Payment: Winzer
Corporation: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451279 04/02/2025 Winzer Corporation 0 402.27 402.27
Supplier Payment: Gentry General
Engineering Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Gentry General
Engineering Inc
8,247.93 0 8,247.93
Supplier Payment: League Of
California Cities: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451242 04/02/2025 League Of California Cities 700.00 0 700.00 Supplier Payment: Merrimac
Petroleum Inc: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
04/02/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 0 9,408.71 9,408.71
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451268 04/02/2025 Southern California Edison 16,724.01 0 16,724.01 Supplier Payment: Velocity Truck
Centers: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451274 04/02/2025 Velocity Truck Centers 1,031.03 0 1,031.03 Supplier Payment: Confire Jpa:
04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
04/02/2025 Confire Jpa 0 272,966.75 272,966.75
Supplier Payment: 6 Inch Media,
LLC: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 6 Inch Media, LLC 5,000.00 0 5,000.00
Supplier Payment: Ferguson
Enterprises Llc #1350: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451235 04/02/2025 Ferguson Enterprises Llc
#1350
669.90 0 669.90
Supplier Payment: Teamcalifornia
Economic Development: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451271 04/02/2025 Teamcalifornia Economic
Development
3,300.00 0 3,300.00
Supplier Payment: Mr T'S Towing
Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451248 04/02/2025 Mr T'S Towing Inc 330.00 0 330.00
Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths
Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Abc Locksmiths Inc 382.33 0 382.33
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451267 04/02/2025 Southern California Edison 0 4,190.64 4,190.64 Supplier Payment: Delta Dental
Insurance Company: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Delta Dental Insurance
Company
1,836.06 0 1,836.06
Supplier Payment: Palmer
Consulting: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Palmer Consulting 9,030.00 0 9,030.00
Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory
Printing Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451239 04/02/2025 Graphics Factory Printing
Inc
245.67 0 245.67
Supplier Payment: Wilson & Bell
Auto Service: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451278 04/02/2025 Wilson & Bell Auto Service 160.00 0 160.00

Page 24 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 12 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Alliance Laundry
Systems: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451221 04/02/2025 Alliance Laundry Systems 0 234.00 234.00 Supplier Payment: San Gabriel
Valley Water Company: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451261 04/02/2025 San Gabriel Valley Water
Company
18,739.35 0 18,739.35
Supplier Payment: Siteone
Landscape Supply Llc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451263 04/02/2025 Siteone Landscape Supply
Llc
1,640.30 0 1,640.30
Supplier Payment: California Library
Association: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451226 04/02/2025 California Library
Association
1,250.00 0 1,250.00
Supplier Payment: Boot Barn Inc:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451224 04/02/2025 Boot Barn Inc 1,293.99 0 1,293.99
Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks Vet
Hospital: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451237 04/02/2025 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 400.00 0 400.00 Supplier Payment: Spectrum Reach,
LLC: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451270 04/02/2025 Spectrum Reach, LLC 594.10 0 594.10
Supplier Payment: National Cng &
Fleet Service: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451249 04/02/2025 National Cng & Fleet
Service
325.00 0 325.00
Supplier Payment: Liebert Cassidy
Whitmore: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451243 04/02/2025 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 12,943.00 0 12,943.00 Supplier Payment: Department Of
Justice: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451232 04/02/2025 Department Of Justice 1,537.00 0 1,537.00 Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Napa Auto Parts 576.57 0 576.57
Supplier Payment: K-K
Woodworking: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451241 04/02/2025 K-K Woodworking 43.05 0 43.05
Supplier Payment: Burrtec Waste
Industries Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451225 04/02/2025 Burrtec Waste Industries
Inc
29,880.00 0 29,880.00
Supplier Payment: Minuteman Press:
04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451247 04/02/2025 Minuteman Press 0 164.74 164.74
Supplier Payment: C V W D:
04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451231 04/02/2025 C V W D 0 364.71 364.71
Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary
Supply: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451276 04/02/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 265.93 0 265.93 Supplier Payment: Cheyne Ellett:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451228 04/02/2025 Cheyne Ellett 750.00 0 750.00
Supplier Payment: Richards Watson
& Gershon: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
23,319.58 0 23,319.58
Supplier Payment: Auto & Rv
Specialists Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451222 04/02/2025 Auto & Rv Specialists Inc 120.69 0 120.69

Page 25 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 13 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors
Ontario Inc: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451229 04/02/2025 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 0 325.86 325.86 Supplier Payment: Grainger:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451238 04/02/2025 Grainger 112.73 0 112.73
Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Psa Print Group 291.44 0 291.44
Supplier Payment: Backflow Parts
Usa: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451223 04/02/2025 Backflow Parts Usa 749.27 0 749.27
Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group:
04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
04/02/2025 Psa Print Group 0 107.88 107.88
Supplier Payment: Nick Barbieri
Trucking Llc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451251 04/02/2025 Nick Barbieri Trucking Llc 1,278.41 0 1,278.41 Supplier Payment: Little Bear
Productions: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451244 04/02/2025 Little Bear Productions 645.00 0 645.00 Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451220 04/02/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 0 487.33 487.33
Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Data Ticket Inc 1,390.72 0 1,390.72
Supplier Payment: Occupational
Health Centers Of Ca: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451252 04/02/2025 Occupational Health
Centers Of Ca
9,416.00 0 9,416.00
Supplier Payment: Rancho Smog
Center: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451258 04/02/2025 Rancho Smog Center 199.80 0 199.80
Supplier Payment: Quadient Inc:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451256 04/02/2025 Quadient Inc 128.60 0 128.60
Supplier Payment: Sharon Ott:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Sharon Ott 936.00 0 936.00
Supplier Payment: The Sign Shop:
04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451272 04/02/2025 The Sign Shop 0 969.75 969.75
Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr
Supply Company: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451245 04/02/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply
Company
0 42.15 42.15
Supplier Payment: Gentry Brothers
Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Gentry Brothers Inc 348,578.22 0 348,578.22
Supplier Payment: New Urban Realty
Advisors: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451250 04/02/2025 New Urban Realty
Advisors
5,183.59 0 5,183.59
Supplier Payment: 49Er
Communications Inc: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451219 04/02/2025 49Er Communications Inc 0 179.35 179.35

Page 26 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 14 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Dawson
Productions Llc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Dawson Productions Llc 5,600.00 0 5,600.00
Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric
Company Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Graybar Electric Company
Inc
783.36 0 783.36
Supplier Payment: Champion Fire
Systems Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Champion Fire Systems
Inc
1,690.00 0 1,690.00
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451253 04/02/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 988.28 0 988.28 Supplier Payment: Pre-Paid Legal
Services Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451254 04/02/2025 Pre-Paid Legal Services
Inc
191.54 0 191.54
Supplier Payment: Enko Systems
Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451233 04/02/2025 Enko Systems Inc 1,537.50 0 1,537.50
Supplier Payment: Inland Overhead
Door Company: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451240 04/02/2025 Inland Overhead Door
Company
9,935.00 0 9,935.00
Supplier Payment: Delta Dental Of
California: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Delta Dental Of California 44,600.13 0 44,600.13 Supplier Payment: CSG Consultants,
Inc.: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451230 04/02/2025 CSG Consultants, Inc. 15,055.00 0 15,055.00 Supplier Payment: Rancho
Cucamonga Town Square:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451257 04/02/2025 Rancho Cucamonga Town
Square
40,496.54 0 40,496.54
Supplier Payment: Mesa Energy
Systems Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451246 04/02/2025 Mesa Energy Systems Inc 4,029.03 0 4,029.03 Supplier Payment: Factory Motor
Parts: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451234 04/02/2025 Factory Motor Parts 0 802.77 802.77
Supplier Payment: Richards Watson
& Gershon: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
04/02/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
0 1,628.40 1,628.40
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451236 04/02/2025 Frontier Comm 0 498.17 498.17
Supplier Payment: Merrimac
Petroleum Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 4,532.24 0 4,532.24
Supplier Payment: Prime Glass:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451255 04/02/2025 Prime Glass 361.38 0 361.38
Supplier Payment: Red Wing
Business Advantage Account:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451259 04/02/2025 Red Wing Business
Advantage Account
352.50 0 352.50
Supplier Payment: Aufbau
Corporation: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
04/02/2025 Aufbau Corporation 0 5,110.00 5,110.00

Page 27 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:54 AM
04/07/2025

Page 15 of 15 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of RanchoCucamonga Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Velocity Truck
Centers: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451275 04/02/2025 Velocity Truck Centers 0 119.59 119.59 Supplier Payment: Carissa Hugo:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451227 04/02/2025 Carissa Hugo 750.00 0 750.00
Supplier Payment: Safety-Kleen
Systems Inc: 04/02/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451260 04/02/2025 Safety-Kleen Systems Inc 0 571.34 571.34 Supplier Payment: Uline: 04/02/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451273 04/02/2025 Uline 354.95 0 354.95
Supplier Payment: Mariposa
Landscapes Inc: 04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/02/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 10,686.04 0 10,686.04 Supplier Payment: Shred Pros:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451262 04/02/2025 Shred Pros 195.00 0 195.00
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison - Remit-To: RCMU:
04/02/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451269 04/02/2025 Southern California Edison 470.96 0 470.96 Supplier Payment: C V W D:
04/03/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451306 04/03/2025 C V W D 0 1,290.07 1,290.07
Supplier Payment: C V W D:
04/03/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451305 04/03/2025 C V W D 182,060.12 0 182,060.12
Supplier Payment: Sharon Ott:
04/03/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/03/2025 Sharon Ott 1,100.40 0 1,100.40
Supplier Payment: Stephanie
Contreras: 04/03/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/03/2025 Stephanie Contreras 479.16 0 479.16
6,490,770.55 810,053.82 7,300,824.37

Page 28 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $37,750.31 Dated March 26, 2025, Through April 6, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $33,489.70 and $4,260.61 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.

BACKGROUND:

N/A
ANALYSIS:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register

Page 29 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - SoCal Gas 07:59 AM
04/07/2025

Page 1 of 1 ends

Page 30 ends

DATE:

TO:

FROM:

INITIATED BY:

SUBJECT:

April 16, 2025
Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
Cheryl Combs, Procurement Business Partner
Consideration to Declare Surplus for Vehicle, Retired Computer, Monitors, Laptops, iPhones, and iPads, Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council declare the vehicle and the list of retired computers, monitors, laptops, iPhones, and iPads detailed in the Analysis section that have been deemed no longer needed, obsolete, or unusable surplus.

BACKGROUND:

Per the City's Municipal Code Section 3.08.150, the Procurement Manager shall have the authority, granted by the City Council, to request to dispose of City items that have been deemed as obsolete and unsuitable for City use. Methods for disposing of surplus are to exchange for or trade in on new supplies, transfer to another department, or offer for sale on a competitive bid basis. After a reasonable effort, and if no bids have been received, Procurement may dispose of surplus for the highest scrap value. The City may sell surplus property to any other governmental agency at a fair market value without any other bids or donate surplus property to any agency or entity which is exempt from federal income tax, with the approval of City Council.

ANALYSIS:

The items to be considered for surplus at this time were submitted by the “DoIT” Department of Innovation & Technology and the Public Works Department. Proposed surplus items include a vehicle, retired computers, monitors, laptops, iPhones, and iPads deemed no longer needed, obsolete or unusable. Staff recommends Council approve the disposal of these items through auction or best method as determined by the Procurement Manager.

F/A No. MFG. Description Model Serial No.

Computer Equipment
1680 Xerox Printer 3615 A2T196372
6234 Xerox Printer 3615 A2T196370
1685 Hp Printer P2015DN CNBJR63133
5372 Xerox Printer 3615 A2T196357

Page 31 ends

Page 2 ends

F/A No. MFG. Description Model Serial No.

N/A Xerox Printer 3550 VMA574564
N/A Lenovo Monitor 9419-HC2 VLY2078
7181 Lenovo Tower P520c 1S30BYS4SN00MJ0A70H3
N/A Lenovo Monitor 9419-HC2 VLY1405
5752 MSI All in One AW-NE238H MSAA75F9S0102864
1693 HP Monitor W2082A CNC503NPLR
1713 HP Monitor P201 6CM42829GW
N/S Lenovo Monitor 9419-HC2 VLY1403
N/A Lenovo Monitor 9419-HC2 VLY2087
5753 MSI All in One AW-NE238H MSAA75F9S0102871
1366 HP Monitor P201 3CQ3422LZZ
1021 DELL Monitor U2412MB CN0YMYH17426159T1NVS
NA Hp Printer CP5225 CNGCL6703J
NA Hp Printer P4015X CNDY259715
4854 HP Tower PRO6300 MXL330086X
1536 APPLE IMAC IMAC W89092MN0TF
3520 APPLE IMAC IMAC YM9243QC0TF
NA HITI Printer S420 S1NI0A14500005
NA SONY Projector VPLFX51 13245
4879 HP Tower PRO6300 MXL33008BQ
4889 HP Tower PRO6300 MXL330085B
7156 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ0A4AVK
6427 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ075NH9
6793 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ08Q596
7065 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ0A4ATN
6662 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ08B5DY
6633 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ07RFA9
6388 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ06MR0S
6916 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ0910H0
7211 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ0A4AVF
6890 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ09EE3D
6950 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ0A4AXR
6753 Lenovo Tiny M920q MJ08Q5A4
NA eMachines Tower el1850 PTNBK02012050003B29600
NA Datacard Printer PX10 CQUH03611
6188 Intel PC NUC6155YK G6SY70100BF2
6192 Intel PC NUC6155YK G6SY70100BMT
6190 Intel PC NUC6155YK G6SY70100BF9
6824 Lenovo Tiny M920 MJ098LE2
1657 HP Monitor P201 3CQ3422LZC
7348 HP Laptop 3165NGW CND7030G9J
7841 HP Laptop 3165NGW CND7030CZR

Page 32 ends

Page 3 ends

F/A No. MFG. Description Model Serial No.
7239 HP Laptop 3165NGW CND7030DJC
7347 HP Laptop 3165NGW CND7030GBP
7349 HP Laptop 3165NGW CND7030FMQ
7360 HP Laptop 3165NGW CND7030FKS
4683 ASUS All in One AIO D9PTBX020087
NA Ingenico Credit card printer IPP320 15309PP81810287
NA Ingenico Credit card printer IPP320 15310PP81811491
NA Ingenico Credit card printer IPP320 15309PP81810287
NA Ingenico Credit card printer IPP320 15127PP81458673
NA Ingenico Credit card printer IPP320 15310PP81811372
NA Ingenico Credit card printer IPP320 15310PP81811499
4871 Lenovo Monitor 9417HC2 VLLX808
1648 Tatung Monitor TS17R-M01 S09098470023
4685 ASUS All in One AOI D9PTBX020091
7742 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089060
7730 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089140
7740 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089173
7743 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089139
7748 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089311
7732 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31088999
7745 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31088959
7736 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089242
7746 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31088933
7734 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089285
7733 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31088958
7739 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089366
7731 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089175
7747 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31088970
7744 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089171
7741 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089172
7793 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31089241
7737 TMOBILE MIFI T9 PTL31088931
1214 HP Monitor P201 3CQ352018V
1368 HP Monitor P201 3CQ3422LZR
1660 HP Monitor P201 3CQ3422LZP
6404 APPLE IPAD A1893 DMPW530YJF8M
NA APPLE IPAD A1822 GCHV710ZHLF9
NA APPLE IPAD A1822 GCHV75MHLF9
IS00922 EPSON Printer M244A MXFF340476
NA SHORETEL Phone IP40G 105809FW16454DEB04

Page 33 ends

Page 4 ends

F/A No. MFG. Description Model Serial No.
7690 ACER LAPTOP R841T NXAA5AA0041171AF247600

VEHICLE
UNIT # Year - Make - Model VIN #
1593 2000 Ford F-350 1FDWF36F5YED68707
FISCAL IMPACT:

As of March 25, 2025, Fiscal year 2024/25, surplus has accumulated $115,382.31 in sales through the Public Surplus auction site.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

Reusing and recycling items supports the City Council's Core Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Page 34 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Neil Plummer, Director of Public Works Services Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration to Schedule a Public Hearing for Placement of Liens and Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council to schedule a public hearing for the placement of special assessments/liens for delinquent solid waste accounts to take place on May 21, 2025, during the regularly scheduled council meeting.

BACKGROUND:

Per Section 8.17.170 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the requirements are established for mandatory payment for residential, commercial and industrial solid waste collection service. As a result, the municipal code requires all occupied properties within the City to maintain weekly solid waste collection service provided by the existing franchise waste hauler, or comply with the requirements of the self-haul permit program administered by City staff. This section of the code allows fees that are delinquent for more than 60 days to become special assessments against the respective parcels of land, resulting in liens on the property for the amount of the delinquent fee, plus administrative charges.

ANALYSIS:

Upon approval to schedule the public hearing, the public hearing notices will be mailed out to property owners with delinquent solid waste accounts that accrued from January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. Notices will be sent via first class mail no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City will receive revenue in the form of a franchise fee when the delinquent accounts are paid through the County of San Bernardino property tax collection process.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item is in line with Council Core Values, in ensuring all residential, commercial, and industrial property owners are receiving mandatory trash service to ensure a healthy and safe community for all.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Page 35 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Justine Garcia, Deputy Director of Engineering Services Clarence de Guzman, Management Analyst II
Matthew Murphy, CivicSpark Fellow
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. for the Creation of Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Suggested Routes Maps in the Amount of $159,000, Including a 5% Contingency. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. for the completion of the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Suggested Routes Maps in the amount of $ $151,270; and

2. Authorize a 5% contingency in the amount of $7,570 to be released by the Director of Engineering Services as necessary for the completion of the project.

BACKGROUND:

In Fall 2024, the City was awarded a Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program Grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). Its objectives included creating and updating walk, ride, and roll maps for the 31 public elementary and middle schools in Rancho Cucamonga. As part of the City’s participation in the National Safe Routes to School Program (SRTS) to enhance student safety and promote active transportation, maps were created in 2008 and 2016 with similar parameters. This Project aims to update these materials and provide digital maps that identify safer routes for walking, bicycling, or rolling to schools.

Promoting safe walking, biking, and rolling with user-friendly maps advances the goals of PlanRC, by reinforcing the City's commitment to ensuring safety for all travel modes throughout the community. Indeed, the impacts of these strategies extend far beyond roadway safety alone.

Fewer vehicles on the road translate to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved air quality conditions, increased physical activity leads to reduced rates of obesity and chronic diseases. Students are better prepared to learn when they engage in meaningful physical activity before school, fostering lifelong healthy habits. A better understanding of how to facilitate safer active modes of travel further reduces dependence on automobiles for short-range trips within the city and effectively promotes active transportation.

Page 36 ends

Page 2 ends

ANALYSIS:

The proposed grant project will continue to rejuvenate the Safe Routes to School Program (SRTS) by providing each school with a useful tool to facilitate safe walking, biking, and rolling.

In March 2025, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was released for consultant services for the completion of the Safe Routes to School Suggested Routes Maps. In total, three (3) qualified proposal responses were evaluated and rated in accordance with the criteria specified in the RFP.

Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. was selected based on their previous experience with similar projects, their understanding of the project, clear approach, transparent timeline, and innovative solutions. This includes a preconfigured digital mapping tool that is focused and engaging, designed for seamless use on both web and mobile devices.

The scope of work to be performed includes the development of physical 2D maps as well as a digital tool, to ensure the maps are accessible and useful to a contemporary user. Each map will reflect local conditions and community input to ensure relevance and usability. Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. will also ensure education and training is provided for City staff to be able to easily update maps and the digital tool, as future changes to the road network are implemented in accordance with the City’s General Plan (Plan RC) and implementation of Connect RC.

A copy of the Professional Services Agreement is on file with the City Clerk’s Office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The estimated cost for the proposed contract is $159,000. The City is eligible for grant reimbursement for 100% of the contract costs from the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program Grant from the California OTS. No matching contributions are required at this time. Appropriations to receive and expend the grant funds were approved by City Council on September 17, 2024, in the amount of $200,000. A portion of those appropriated grant funds will cover the costs of the contract award to Mark Thomas. The rest of the appropriated grant funds have either already been in use or will continue to be expended for the remaining scope of work as outlined in the City’s grant award agreement with OTS.

The City will be reimbursed from grant funds when invoices for eligible expenses are submitted to the grant administrator throughout the duration of the grant period.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This Project addresses the City Council’s core value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, as well as intentionally embracing and anticipating our future. It also incorporates working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Scope of Work

Page 37 ends

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL SUGGESTED ROUTES MAPS
City of Rancho Cucamonga

MARK THOMAS

Page 26 ends

delivering the project and to quickly secure guidance
and direction on project elements to deliver the project consistent with the proposed schedule. The meetings
will be concise, organized, and led by the Mark Thomas
PM. Participation in the monthly PM status meetings is
anticipated to include the City of Rancho Cucamonga
designated PM and additional team members will be
invited to the status meetings as needed to review the
status of deliverables and solicit Client direction.

Additional focus meetings with City staff may be needed to review key items and deliverables. We assume up to four (4) focus meetings in addition to the PM status meetings.

TASK 1 DELIVERABLES:
» Organize and Lead Project Kick-Off Meeting (materials and action notes for 1 meeting)
» Schedule (draft and final)
» Progress Report and Invoices (assume monthly)
» PM Status Meetings (assume monthly agenda and
notes)
» Focus Meetings (assume four meetings)
TA S K 2. E X I S T I N G

CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
TASK 2.1. LITERATURE REVIEW
The Mark Thomas teal will conduct a literature review of applicable local SRTS and active transportation plans to utilize for the Project. Plans for review are anticipated to include the following:

3.9 PROPOSAL RESPONSE

SCOPE OF WORK
Following a Notice-to-Proceed (NTP), Mark Thomas will
initiate and advance the Project utilizing the following outline of tasks.

TA S K 1. P R OJ EC T

M A N AG E M E N T A N D

COORDINATION
TASK 1.1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The Mark Thomas Project Manager (PM), Stephen
Decker, will communicate directly with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s PM and manage the internal project team for project delivery. Project management will include delivery of monthly progress reports and invoices for review and approval by the client. The progress reports will include:

1. Work during reporting period

2. Work anticipated during next reporting period

3. Project challenges and solutions

4. Status of project schedule
TASK 1.2. PROJECT KICK-OFF MEETING
We will organize and facilitate a virtual project kick-off meeting with City staff to discuss the project background, goals, key milestones, approach to delivery, involved
agency partners, and key stakeholders for involvement.

The kick-off meeting provides an opportunity to hear the City’s project vision, goals, objectives, potential challenges, and important deadlines. The kick-off meeting will be
held within two (2) weeks of the notice-to-proceed (NTP) agreement. We will identify key project outcomes to ensure that expectations and deliverables are well-defined for project success. The Mark Thomas Team will listen to the discussion to determine how best to serve the City.

TASK 1.3. MONTHLY PROJECT

MANAGMENT MEETINGS
Throughout the duration of the project, we will host
monthly PM status meetings via a Mark Thomasprovided videoconference link. The videoconference is recommended to allow for a screenshare opportunity
where meeting notes are recorded in real-time to
document discussion, provides accountability, and establish clear action items. The frequency of PM status meetings is intended to maintain a conversational approach to
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 38 ends

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL SUGGESTED ROUTES MAPS
City of Rancho Cucamonga

MARK THOMAS

Page 27 ends

• Connect Rancho Cucamonga (2023)
• Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (2021)
• Existing Rancho Cucamonga Suggested Safe Routes to
School Maps (2007 and 2017)
• Regional Safe Routes to School Plan Phase II, Volume II – City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority (2017)
• Active Transportation Plan, San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority (2022)
TASK 2.2. DATA REQUEST DOCUMENT
In order to obtain the necessary data within a timeline that advances the project document, our team will draft a Data Request Document. The Data Request Document
will outline the project data sets, data set owners, request process, timeline, and data delivery checklist. The data requests will be executed through a Data Request
Memorandum developed by the Mark Thomas team for
submission to the City following the project kick-off..

TASK 2.3. SITE VISITS
As needed, Mark Thomas will conduct site visits to
supplement the literature review for schools without
existing maps and schools within the four areas designated by the States Environmentally Disadvantaged Communities to ensure equitable developed suggested routes south
of Foothill Boulevard. Including schools in census tracks include 21.10, 21.07, 21.05, and 13.11. Mark Thomas will use the Site Visit to develop GIS datasets by inventorying missing pathways and corridors, (i.e. side paths, local roadways, etc). See task 5.1 below for more information.

TASK 2 DELIVERABLES:
» Literature Review (technical memorandum)
» Site Visits (over 2-3 day)
» Data Request Document
TA S K 3 . C O M M U N I T Y

O U T R E AC H A N D

ENGAGEMENT
Mark Thomas will gather feedback and engage students,
families, school district officials, community-based
organizations, first responders, regional and local
stakeholders, and City departments to gain input to refine and adjust recommended routes to schools.

Our team has a demonstrated history of developing
multi-faceted outreach strategies by utilizing traditional grassroots methods, innovative tools and technology, and the development of strategic partnerships with communitybased organizations (CBOs) and other key stakeholders.

Our layered outreach approach seeks to meet stakeholders where they are while providing a variety of methods for engagement.

TASK 3.1 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLAN
We will develop a Public Engagement Plan (PEP) that
outlines the planned effort for engaging the public,
school representatives, disadvantaged and underserved
community members, businesses, Parent Teacher
Associations, community-based organizations, and other
local and regional stakeholders. We will use input from the kick-off meeting to refine and tailor the proposed
outreach scope and will prepare a detailed and organized PEP. The PEP will discuss goals and objectives, focused audiences, communications and outreach tools, proposed
activities and timelines, language translation, and roles and responsibilities.

Strategies in this PEP will include a variety of traditional and digital notification efforts to inform and engage the public, particularly disadvantaged and underserved communities
in the study area. In addition to describing the strategic vision and a detailed schedule, the PEP will identify:
• Focus audiences and tailored notification tactics,
including equity approach.
• Digital outreach and engagement tools and platforms
and methods of making them more accessible to the
public.
• Strategies to engaging historically underrepresented
stakeholders, including Spanish speakers.
• Goals for public input and review process.

Page 39 ends

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL SUGGESTED ROUTES MAPS
City of Rancho Cucamonga

MARK THOMAS

Page 28 ends

TASK 3.2. COLLATERAL MATERIALS
We will develop and produce collateral materials for the project. This includes project fact sheets, meeting flyers, display boards, and meeting presentations. We will provide English and Spanish translation of a select number of
materials as needed. Materials can include lawn signs and banners soliciting input on the online map.

TASK 3.3. VIRTUAL COMMUNITY

WORKSHOPS
To increase awareness and provide opportunities for
public input, we will coordinate up to two virtual (2) public meetings. The meetings will be virtual to allow broad
citywide engagement and participation. We will work with all four school districts to share district-wide notifications, and we will target notification efforts in prioritized study areas south of Foothill Boulevard to ensure equitable
resource distribution.

We have developed a draft approach to meeting content
as follows:
• Meeting #1 will present the existing 2007 and 2017
suggested routes to schools maps and gather
participants initial feedback, include their lived
experiences and any infrastructure or traffic pattern
changes since the routes were created.
• Meeting #2 will present and gather participant
feedback on a mock suggested safe routes to school.

We will gather feedback on the users experience
navigating the web interface, and how to improve
the platform for ease and function. Each meeting
will utilize project communications tools to offer an
engaging and immersive experience, as requested.

Meeting formats can include small group discussions,
polling and surveying.

We will lead the coordination and support of the public meetings including coordination of meeting times, virtual platforms. Simultaneous Spanish interpretations can
be provided, as requested. Meeting materials may also
be translated and provided, as needed. All meetings
will be held during the evening hours to accommodate
working individuals. Following each meeting, our team will send out a meeting summary capturing the number of
participants, key stakeholders and key issues and common themes raised by meeting attendees. Comments received
at meetings will be recorded and input into a Meeting
Comment Log.

TASK 3.4. POP-UP TABLING AT

COMMUNITY EVENTS
In addition, our team recommends hosting up to
four (4) pop-up tabling events, prioritizing the States Environmentally Disadvantaged Communities, leading up
to the public meetings. The pop-up events will serve to increase project awareness, particularly among diverse
communities and provide in-person opportunities to talk with stakeholders and further solicit input. At the first two pop-up tabling events, we will display the existing 2007 and 2017 suggested route to school maps to gather feedback, similar to the virtual workshops. At the last two pop-ups, we will display the updated suggested routes to schools. We will work with the City to identify the best locations or existing school events for pop-up attendance or key destinations near schools and high pedestrian volume.

Logistics and support for the events will include
site selection, equipment needed, comment cards,
photography, and English and Spanish collateral materials, along with post-event documentation.

TASK 3.5. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
Upon completion of the public engagement activities, we will prepare an Engagement Summary memorandum that
details the project-related engagement activities including a summary of comments received. The report will outline outreach strategies conducted to establish clarity about the process and illustrate community input. The Engagement
Summary memorandum will also include appendices with
meeting collateral, materials, and additional supporting documents.

TASK 3 DELIVERABLES:
» Public Engagement Plan (draft and final)
» Collateral Materials
» Virtual Community Workshops and Materials (assume
2 meetings)
» Pop-Up Tabling Event Attendance (assume 4 pop-ups/
event attendance)
» Engagement Summary Memorandum (draft and final)

Page 40 ends

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL SUGGESTED ROUTES MAPS
City of Rancho Cucamonga

MARK THOMAS

Page 29 ends

TA S K 4. U P DAT E E X I S T I N G

S U G G E S T E D S A F E R O U T E S

TO SCHOOL
Utilizing literature review, field conditions analysis, and public input, Mark Thomas will update walking, biking, and rolling routes for students and families traveling to and from schools.

TASK 4.1. DEVELOP ROUTE CRITERIA
Based on priorities identified by the City, Mark Thomas will utilize criteria to refine the suggested routes. Criteria for use will include but is not limited to:
• Traffic volume (as available)
• Traffic calming features
• Intersection crossings
• Facility types (street adjacent sidewalks, off-street trails, park pathways, etc.)
• Street lighting (as available)
• Availability of bike facilities and sidewalks
• Distance to school
Mark Thomas will utilize the route criteria list to update the currently available suggested routes to schools.

TASK 4 DELIVERABLES:
» Suggested Route Criteria List (draft and final)
TASK 5. D I G I T I Z E D

S U G G E S T E D S A F E R O U T E S

TO SCHOOL
TASK 5.1. GIS DATASETS
Mark Thomas will develop GIS datasets to expand the
identified sidewalks or possible routes. Mark Thomas will expand the routes network based on site visits conducted by staff. The current GIS data set excludes some sidewalks, paths, local and collector roadways. Mark Thomas
anticipates adding these facilities in GIS to create additional accessible, and efficient suggested safe routes to school.

TASK 5.2. ONLINE SUGGESTED SRTS

PLATFORM
Mark Thomas will design and develop a dedicated
interactive online tool utilizing Esri’s ArcGIS software that allows users to view their current location, isolate the suggested safe routes to the intended school destination, and filter the routes based upon mode. We propose the
following tabs and content to include upon website launch:
• Pop-up Window: Summary of purpose and how to
use the tool. The window will require user to click
the “I’ve read” check box before closing the pop-up
window to use the platform.
• Legend: Host clear visualization of important
infrastructure elements, such as crosswalks, bicycle
facilities, controlled intersections, schools, and more. • Crash Data: Heat map of historically high crash rates (most recent 5 years of available and comprehensive
data from TIMS).
• GIS-based Map: The map will host the City of Rancho
Cucamonga’s roadways, routes, trails, parks, and ability to isolate schools.
• Suggested Routes: The Suggested SRTS routes for
each school enrollment area will be highlighted upon
selection.
• Walk/Roll Time: Estimated travel times will be
highlighted via colored polygons and displayed on the
legend.
• School Details: Interactive GIS-based map illustrating access points into the school. Schools can be
organized by school district or school level, and can be selected through a drop-down menu.
• Additional FAQ: List additional frequently asked
questions as needed.
• Funding: Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) logo and
narrative detailing the project’s funding source.
• Contact: a dedicated project email will be listed to

Page 41 ends

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL SUGGESTED ROUTES MAPS
City of Rancho Cucamonga

MARK THOMAS

Page 30 ends

collect feedback and comments. The tab will also
feature a comment box and name of the City Point of
Contact.

We anticipate refinement of the list of items included above based on input from City staff.

The digital platform will be compatible with smartphone mobile devices for on-the-go user access. The platform
interface will include instinctive SRTS and active
transportation infrastructure icon elements to provide clear visuals of what users can expect on their routes, including crosswalks, bike facilities, traffic signals, and more.

TASK 5.3. DEVELOP BACKEND SYSTEM
Mark Thomas will develop the online platform with easy
updates and maintenance in mind, to ensure the tool
remains relevant and accurate. Future platform managers will be able to easily update the map as new infrastructure projects or updates are implemented over time.

TASK 5.4. NEW AND UPDATED DATA

INTEGRATION PROCESS
Mark Thomas will create a list of key events or data the City can monitor for updates. Data that might trigger updates might include:
• Annual crash data updates (local data and statewide
systems including SWITRS and TIMS crash data)
• Attendance boundaries changes
• Local Capital Improvement Projects and development
updates
• Unforeseen events such as unexpected manmade or
natural disasters
TASK 5.5. TRAINING AND MAINTENANCE
MANUAL
Mark Thomas will develop an SRTS Platform Training
Manual for internal City staff use. The Manual will equip City staff to manage, maintain, and troubleshoot the tool, over time. The Manual will include but is not limited to a suggested maintenance schedule, how to update school
and regional changes and map collaboration permissions.

TASK 5.6. PLATFORM COMPLETION AND

TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP
Upon completion of the platform, Mark Thomas will
transfer ownership of the application, supporting map, and feature datasets to an ArcGIS Online account under the
City’s ArcGIS Online organization.

TASK 5 DELIVERABLES:
» Online Platform Interface (draft and final)
» Training and Maintenance Manual (draft and final and
response tracking database)
TASK 6. SUMMARY REPORT
Mark Thomas will prepare a report to summarize the
literature review analysis, a community engagement plan and outreach summary, an explanation of recommended
route criteria, and a digital tool maintenance plan.

TASK 6.1. DRAFT REPORT
Mark Thomas will develop a draft report for City staff’s review.

TASK 6.2. FINAL REPORT
Mark Thomas will update the draft report based on the
City’s review, to develop the final report.

TASK 6.3. PRESENTATION MATERIALS
Mark Thomas will assist City staff in preparing a high-level presentation of the project process, analysis, findings, and website for presentation to the City Council.

TASK 6 DELIVERABLES:
» Summary Report (draft and final)
» Prepare Presentation Materials (presentations)

ASSUMPTIONS
We assume the following items:
• The Client will share the 2007 and 2017 static map and raw files for the Consultant to use as a starting point for updated suggested routes, site conditions, and
community input.

Page 42 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer
Sarine Hazarshahian, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration of an Appropriation from Fund 174 (Gas Tax R&T7360) in the Amount of $360,000, Award of a Professional Services Agreement with Roadway Asset Services in the Amount of $195,190 for Consulting Services for Preparation of a Pavement Management Plan, and Authorization for the City Engineer to Approve the Use of an Additional $164,780 for Optional Services and Contingency as Deemed Necessary.

This Project is Exempt From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize an appropriation from Fund 174 (Gas Tax R&T7360) to Account No. F174 | CC307 | SC2106, in the amount of $360,000;

2. Enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Roadway Asset Services in the base amount of $195,190, for the development of the Pavement Management Plan (PMP); and

3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the use of up to $164,780 for Optional Services and Contingency as deemed necessary throughout the project.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s Pavement Management Program is one of the most significant investments in the City’s roadway infrastructure. Each year, the Engineering Services Department relies on the most upto-date Pavement Management Plan (PMP) to understand pavement conditions, plan for projects, and provide effective management of the City’s largest asset, its roadway pavement infrastructure. Over time, due to vehicle wear and tear, environmental elements such as sun and rain, and other factors, the pavement condition on any given roadway will deteriorate. If maintained regularly, either with a slurry seal or pavement overlays, the life of the roadway can be prolonged, avoiding the need for full roadway reconstruction, which can prove to be several orders of magnitude more costly. The PMP, which is ideally updated every five (5) years, allows staff to appropriately plan projects to prolong the life of our roadway pavement. The City’s current PMP was last updated on March 6, 2019.

Page 43 ends

Page 2 ends

The planned update of the PMP includes a survey of the existing pavement condition of all City roadways, comprehensive pavement analysis with multi-year maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations based on various budget scenarios, and access to a web-based pavement management system that can be updated by City staff. The program would also include deterioration curves that forecast the degradation of the pavement condition and the cost of deferring maintenance. With this information, the City can plan and budget maintenance projects over multiple years.

ANALYSIS:

In August 2024, a Request for Proposal (RFP) was released for Consulting Services for the update of the “Pavement and Asset Management Program”. In total, eight (8) qualified proposal responses were evaluated and rated in accordance with the criteria specified in the RFP.

Roadway Asset Services was selected based on their advanced pavement data collection technologies and plan to provide deliverables clearly and efficiently.

The scope of work to be performed consists of, conducting a field survey of the pavement condition of approximately 497 centerline miles of City maintained roads, compiling a comprehensive pavement analysis with multi-year maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations based on various budget scenarios, and two (2) years of access to a webbased pavement management system software that can be updated by City staff.

Optional services will include an additional three years of access to the web-based pavement management system software and re-collection of data and program update in Fiscal Year 2027/28. This extended software subscription would allow City staff to run additional budget scenarios in the later years of this cycle of the PMP and will allow for the tracking of completed road maintenance projects to keep the pavement inventory current. In addition, the re-collection of data along major arterials will confirm if pavement degradation is in line with the original degradation forecasts and, if needed, will adjust the recommendations for future projects within the remaining three years of the PMP cycle. Both optional services are intended to best plan for and utilize City capital investment funds. Given the nature of this project, staff is suggesting a phased approach to the work with the base scope of work beginning immediately and providing the City Engineer with the authority to release the remaining optional work as deemed appropriate and in the best interest of the City.

A copy of the Professional Services Agreement is held on file with the City Clerk’s office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Anticipated costs for the development of the PMP are estimated as follows:

Task Amount
Pavement Management Plan $195,190
Optional Services
Software License (Additional Three Years) $60,000
Plan Update and Recollection 2027/2028 $72,050
Subtotal Costs with Optional Services $327,240
Contingency $32,730
Total with Optional Services and Contingency $359,970
The cost for this project was unknown at the time of annual budget preparation and was therefore not included in the annual budget recommendation for FY2024/25. Staff is recommending that funding in the amount of $360,000 be appropriated for the project from Fund 174, Gas Tax

Page 44 ends

Page 3 ends

R&T736, to cover the contract costs as described above.

Account No. Funding Source Description Amount
F174 CC307 SC2106 Gas Tax R&T7360
(Fund 174)
Pavement Management
Plan
$360,000
Total Project Funding $360,000
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This project meets our City Council core values by its relentless pursuit of improvement through the use of technology and innovative solutions to develop projects and provide high-quality public infrastructure.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Scope of Work and Fee Breakdown

Page 45 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 1 ends

Scope of Work
City of Rancho Cucamonga: Pavement & Asset Management Program Section I: Scope of Work Description
Roadway Asset Services, LLC (CONSULTANT) understands that the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CLIENT) requests the performance of Pavement and Right-of-Way Asset (ROW) Data Collection and Reporting services to assess the existing condition of all existing public roadway pavements within the City’s boundaries.

Base Scope of Work: PMP Inventory: The project will be completed by conducting a field survey of the pavement conditions on all CLIENT maintained roads in accordance with a modified version of the ASTM Standard D6433 “Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Surveys.” The PCI based pavement condition and right-of-way asset image survey is to be conducted on approximately 497 centerline miles (646 survey miles accounting for two-directional testing on arterial, collector, and industrial roads) of roadways within the City limits, on each street segment which is typically block-to-block and tagged with a unique GIS ID on the feature-class layer. The project includes the adoption of the City’s existing street centerline layer. CONSULTANT will proceed with driving arterial roads in two directions and local roadways in a single direction. The test miles are driven by the Roadway Asset Collection (RAC) vehicle and rated for pavement condition on CLIENT owned roads. A comprehensive pavement analysis with multiyear maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations and budget scenarios is to be delivered in a Final Report. CONSULTANT is to implement the BOSSTM pavement management system. For the first year (including the initial report is delivered by approximately January 2026) of the agreement, CONSULTANT will provide the Gold level of service and analysis support to the CLIENT. Upon acceptance of the final report and software operating parameters, CLIENT will have access to BOSSTM WEB and the RAS support program package for the software.

Optional Services: CONSULTANT has separated years 3 through 5 of BOSSTM WEB licenses for the CLIENT to elect to continue that service on an annual basis beginning in year 3. There is also an option for a pavement condition assessment in 2027/2028 of the major roadways should the City elect to update the PCI data and update deterioration models.

The CONSULTANT (Roadway Asset Services, LLC) shall provide the following services to the CLIENT (City of Rancho Cucamonga, California):

Task 1: Project Initiation & Project Management
At the outset of the project, CONSULTANT will work in conjunction with CLIENT staff to review the CLIENT’s existing GIS centerline files and pavement inventory for use in this project. After an initial review, CONSULTANT will conduct a kickoff meeting with CLIENT to discuss the GIS files, deliverable formats, biweekly progress meetings, and additional data needed by CONSULTANT. During the kickoff meeting, CONSULTANT will also present the methodology for the pavement condition assessment and comprehensive ROW asset survey, review with CLIENT the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) plan, introduce key personnel, review equipment, and revise the schedule. Project communication protocol, documentation, accounting methodologies, and data format will be confirmed during the meeting.

Task 1 Deliverables:

1. CONSULTANT will attend the virtual project kick-off meeting.

2. CONSULTANT will coordinate and management schedule, scope and costs.

3. CONSULTANT to coordinate recurring status meetings on a bi-weekly basis.

Attachment 1

Page 46 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 2 ends

Task 2: Field Setup, Centerline Identification & GPS Network Creation Centerline Identification & Field Setup
CONSULTANT will review the CLIENT’s existing GIS centerline and perform an audit of the data to ensure that all roads requiring data collection are surveyed. CONSULTANT will use the existing centerline data and create a pavement database on the centerline layer. Each road segment record in the centerline layer will have a corresponding record in the pavement database.

In addition, CONSULTANT will work with the CLIENT to maintain the unique identifier of each road segment in the road network so that the pavement database can maintain a link to the GIS data. The result will be a clean GIS centerline ready for consumption of additional layers and attribution related to the pavement condition surveys and asset inventories.

At the completion of the GIS audit, CONSULTANT will deliver a .pdf and ArcGIS file geodatabase collection map that ensures arterial and collector roadways are two pass tested and that local roads are single pass tested.

GPS Network Creation
CONSULTANT will consume the final GIS centerline’s to be adopted for the pavement condition surveys as it will serve as the foundation for routing and CLIENT road ownership. The centerline data will be loaded to the RAC van field routing application in preparation of the surveys. The mobile mapping application will be utilized to track the centerline segments surveyed and eventually link the XY coordinates of each automated sample collected.

Task 2 Deliverables:

1. CONSULTANT will develop the road centerline file and GIS data to finalize the extent of the survey.

2. CONSULTANT will initiate field setup, routing, and GIS integration into the RAC vehicle.

Task 3: Collect Roadway Network
The CONSULTANT will collect roadway data and images on 680 survey miles using a Roadway Asset Collection (RAC) vehicle or identical equipment from a strategic business partner. The CONSULTANT retains a fleet of 4 RAC vehicles and may lease additional equipment if necessary to meet timeline objectives.

The CONSULTANT team consists of a driver and operator who will systematically drive the automated data collection vehicle on the road segment listings provided by the CLIENT. The CONSULTANT will collect pavement data with two passes on arterial, collector, and industrial roadways while single pass testing the local roadways. CONSULTANT proposes to use its collection vehicle line scan camera with laser illumination and right-of-way cameras to capture pavement and ROW images to be used during the pavement rating process. Unpaved roads will not be surveyed.

CONSULTANT will record imagery for deliverables and identify all requested right-of-way (ROW) assets by collecting images at 20-ft maximum intervals with an automated data collection survey vehicle equipped with a Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS-2) for automated pavement data acquisition, panoramic camera system for capturing right-of-way imagery, and a laser profiler which includes at minimum two-line lasers for capturing roughness and ride data. CONSULTANT will perform data field collection on paved roads using a state-of-the-art Roadway Asset Collection (RAC) vehicle with the following systems mounted:
• Right-of-way georeferenced images with: Forward, Left, Right, and spherical images. • LCMS-2 pavement 2D/3D imaging.

Attachment 1

Page 47 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 3 ends

• Longitudinal profile with 2-line lasers (left and rightwheel paths) • Distance measuring instrument (DMI) with an accuracy of +/-0.1%. • Differentially corrected GPS (DGPS) with an accuracy of +/- 2 feet. • Applanix POS/LV 220 to compensate for difficult GPS conditions in urbanenvironments. • The RAC vehicle collects pavement and ROW images, IMU, DMI and profiler data concurrently.

A RAS automated data collection vehicle
The International Roughness Index (IRI) will be collected using a class 1 road surface profiler. The road surface profiler meets all ASTM E-950 standards for evaluating the smoothness of pavement.

CONSULTANT will process the LCMS-2 and panoramic imagery to deliver to the CLIENT via an external hard drive with image hyperlinks included in the pavement database (.csv).

Example imagery from RAC camera system
Task 3 Deliverable:

1. CONSULTANT will complete field testing on all paved roadways.

Attachment 1

Page 48 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 4 ends

Task 4: Pavement Condition Index (PCI): ASTM D6433 Distress Processing ASTM D6433 Distress Processing
CONSULTANT will evaluate the PCI
survey results in accordance with ASTM
D6433. CONSULTANT will conduct a
100% linear survey on all CLIENT
maintained roadways driven and
evaluate those sample images using an
analysis program called RoadTRIPTM
(Technical Rating Intelligence Program).

The program was designed around
automated inspection techniques
utilizing a modified ASTM D6433
pavement distress rating protocol that
includes the following distresses:
alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking,
transverse cracking, block cracking,
rutting, weathering/raveling, potholes,
and patching. Experienced pavement
engineers will review the resultant output for accuracy and make any corrections that may be needed. The Road TRIPTM software allows the pavement and right of way imagery to be synchronized and the distress data to be displayed geospatially to provide another layer of QA.

Quality Assurance and Quality Control
The CONSULTANT will perform quality assurance and quality control on all data collected.

CONSULTANT has a proven Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC) procedure for all mobile data collection projects. CONSULTANT QC procedures begin with the RAC vehicles’ collection process.

The technician will check each camera’s exposure rate, image quality, GPS, and IMU operation to ensure the data collection system is recording the image and that the GPS location is within the stated project tolerance. Each collection day’s calibration collection will be documented in the collection logbook. The collection logbook also contains information such as date, location, technician and drivers name, any issue that developed during the collection day and DMI calibration runs.

During image collection, the technician reviews the images collected on-screen as they are collected and any issue with image clarity requires the collection run to end and the image quality issue to be resolved.

Once resolved, the collection run begins from the beginning for the road segment collected. The technician also monitors GPS reception during collection. If GPS reception is lost (measured using PDOP – positional dilution of precision), the technician stops the collection and resolves the GPS reception issue. Collection begins again once the GPS reception issue is resolved. All issues resulting in the collection run being stopped will be recorded in the collection logbook along with the resolution.

With a completed collection drive delivered to CONSULTANT offices, images are post processed and provided to the image QC Officer who will perform quality control checks on each delivery provided. The QC Officer will visually review the collection routes for image quality. All collection runs that are considered of low quality will be marked for recollection before the data collection vehicle(s) is allowed to leave the project site. Additionally, CONSULTANT will provide independent quality checks via field verification to confirm accuracy of automated data collection.

Attachment 1

Page 49 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 5 ends

Task 4 Deliverables:

1. CONSULTANT will deliver all views camera system and a single view of the LCMS-2 downward pavement imagery.

Task 5: RAS Verification & Pilot Review
CONSULTANT will work with the CLIENT to identify and setup a pilot of approximately 10 miles of roadway so that initial sample data can be collected, processed, and verified. CONSULTANT will collect data within pilot project area, process the data and review the result with the CLIENT. If any corrective action is identified during the data validation, such corrections will be applied to the data processing algorithms prior to final PCI calculations. CONSULTANT will work with the CLIENT to review and verify that the data is ready to proceed. This task is to be completed on-site or virtually depending upon the availability of key staff.

Task 5 Deliverables:

1. CONSULTANT will schedule and conduct virtual/on-site field validation with CLIENT staff.

2. CONSULTANT will process data for the pilot area (approx. 10-miles) and data validation meeting.

3. CONSULTANT will make any necessary modifications to processing algorithms.

Task 6: Pavement Widths Verifications
The CONSULTANT will use aerial imagery and the images from the RAC camera system to capture the width of pavement for each street segment to compare with any existing database information. CONSULTATNT will capture multiple widths for each pavement segment, including noticeable width changes (including turn lanes) to ensure an acceptable average width per segment is acquired for budgetary modeling purposes.

Task 6 Deliverables:

1. CONSULTANT will deliver the width measurements as an attribute of the final dataset.

Task 7: Delivery of Inventory Data and PowerBI Portal
The CONSULTANT will package all of the pavement management data into an updated File Geodatabase, a MS PowerBI QC portal, and ArcGIS Online (AGOL) PCI maps for the CLIENT to access. The data included in the deliverable will include; individual pavement distress quantities, densities and deduct values for each segment, PCI for each segment, linked forward-view imagery in the PowerBI portal, and all imagery delivered via a portable hard drive.

Task 7 Deliverables:

1. CONSULTANT will deliver a final GIS file geodatabase containing collected pavement data (containing the Type, Severity and Extent of distresses along the road segment as defined by the ASTM D6433 methodology), distresses, and PCI value for each roadway segment.

2. CONSULTANT to host a PowerBI portal as a QC tool with access to segment-level data and forwardview imagery. a. The QC portal will be hosted by RAS and the term of the license to this portal will last through the duration of the contract. This data is static and will not change with any updates to the BOSS WEBTM system.

Attachment 1

Page 50 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 6 ends

Task 8: Pavement Analysis, Budget Scenarios & Report
CONSULTANT will develop, configure and set up the pavement analysis operating parameters within our Budget Optimization Street Selector (BOSSTM) application. CONSULTANT will configure the software with maintenance and rehabilitation activities, PCI trigger points, costs, reset PCI values, completed rehabilitation work since the survey, planned work, existing budgets, pavement deterioration curve development/assignment, and inflation priorities. CONSULTANT will assist the CLIENT with determining the right treatment (prescription) at the right time by reviewing the CLIENT’s existing maintenance and rehabiliation strategies and recommending others that may be a good fit. The scope will include running at least 10 profile budget runs to establish the budget model trend and showcasing at least 5 budget scenarios for the 5-year pavement analysis.

We propose to provide these services to develop
a 5-year maintenance plan that is financially
optimized and prioritized to meet the needs of
the CLIENT. BOSS™ is a cloud based application
with powerful pavement management algorithms
behind it that export the results of the pavement
analysis to a user friendly interface such as
Microsoft Power BI (single user log-in supplied
and hosted by RAS for the duration of the license
of BOSS WEBTM), Excel Spreadsheets, and
PowerPoint files. All of the results are integrated
with the CLIENT’s existing GIS and supplied to the
CLIENT as a File Geodatabase for consumption and storage.

While the CONSULTANT will define the scenarios to be run with the CLIENT, at a minimum the following questions should be answered with the budgetary scenarios:
• What is the resultant network PCI at my current funding level? • What budget is required to maintain my existing network PCI? • What budget is required to achieve a desired network PCI? • What budget is required to control the growth in backlog? COSULTANT will provide the CLIENT a final executive
report including study objectives, background
information, methodology, work history of completed
maintenance and rehabilitation, inventory of all roads, current pavement conditions for each street function
classification, and network PCI and IRI. In addition, the CLIENT will receive statistical charts, graphs, and area maps illustrating all PCI results, pavement type, the
overall road quality, and findings from the pavement
evaluation.

Task 8 Deliverables:

1. The final pavement and analysis results will be delivered as a File Geodatabase that is ready to be consumed within the CLIENT’s GIS environment.

2. A final report will be drafted that summarizes the results of the data collection survey and budetary models performed as a part of the pavement analysis.

3. Initial analysis parameters will be imported to the CLIENT’s BOSS WEBTM system.

Attachment 1

Page 51 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 7 ends

Task 9: BOSS WEBTM Configuration, Deployment & Training Access to the software grants the CLIENT the ability to add segments to the inventory, edit attributes, modify management section sizes (projects), program completed work, program planned work, modify the customized deterioration curves, re-assign appropriate curves, modify an unlimited number of maintenance and rehabilitation activities, modify priority parameters, run customized budgetary models, and view scenario results. In addition, the BOSS WEB™ software can be linked to update the CLIENT’s GIS via an ArcGIS Online End Point.

Configuration of BOSS WEBTM
The CONSULTANT’S approach to the implementation, hosting, and training for the sofftware includes the following CLIENT engagements during the configuration process. • Deterioration Curves – forecasting pavement conditions requires a detailed set of pavement deterioration curves for each roadway traffic classification and pavement material type, as designated by the pavement management system. The CONSULTANT will develop the deterioration curves to ensure they reflect realistic degradation rates for the CLIENT. • Maintenance & Rehabilitation Setup – to ensure the results of the budget model runs meet the CLIENT’S expectations, the CONSULTANT will discuss the CLIENT’S current Maintenance and Rehabilitation setup within the pavement analysis setup. This will include activity set up, PCI trigger points, and PCI reset scores.

Attachment 1

Page 52 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 8 ends

• Project development – the BOSS WEBTM functionality includes the ability to stitch segments (block’s) together to form a project, also known as a “management section”. The CONSULTANT will work with the CLIENT to review the initial model results and begin “stitching” segments together to form logical projects that best meet the needs of the CLIENT. • Financial Optimization & Prioritization Logic – BOSS WEBTM is designed to run analyses using sound engineering and economic logic to prioritize which street candidates are selected throughout the multi-year plan. While most pavement management programs will prioritize by roadway traffic and condition, BOSS WEBTM takes it a step further and introduces financial optimization into candidate selection through the use of a “Need Year” analysis that identifies each segment’s cost of deferral.

Understanding the “Cost of Segment Deferral” allows the analysis to maximize the CLIENT’S limited funds in the best manner possible.

Attachment 1

Page 53 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 9 ends

BOSS WEBTM Training Program
Functional Training
RAS will conduct BOSS WEB™ training through a series of remote sessions for users of the pavement management application. Software training will be deliberately executed in shorter web sessions that cover a specific area of study within the software. While the training agenda will be developed and approved by City staff toward the end of the project, topics such as the following can be expected:

1. Software overview, user interface, and administration constraints

2. Principles of pavement management
a. How to modify deterioration curves, pavement types, functional classifications, deterioration curves, management sections, treatment groups, selection priorities, visualizations, and inventory attributes.

3. Understanding the pavement condition indices and how BOSS uses them (PCI, RI, SI, and OCI)

4. Network inventory database management such as adding new streets and modifying management sections.

5. How to update the system with the work the City has completed and check to ensure the City is getting the PCI impact that was programmed

6. How to generate custom budget scenario reports and export the data from BOSS

7. How to maintain the database and what to look for within the BOSS system

8. Other topics and more detail will be added to this agenda when developed by RAS and reviewed by City staff.

Tasks 9a-9e: BOSS WEBTM Hosting & Annual Support
Structure
The BOSS WEBTM application leverages an Azure hosted application.

Authentication
User Authentication shall be username / password and include self-service reset options such as email reset and / or one time passcode.

Authorization
The application shall include a user, user group and module security model to manage user access to the features of the application.

Standard Map Functionality
• All maps in the application shall have the option of adding ESRI base maps. Examples include, but are not limited to:
o Imagery
o Streets
o Light gray canvas
o Dark gray canvas
• All maps in the application shall have the option of adding ESRI AGOL reference layers outside of the CLIENT AGOL environment.
• Zoom, Pan, Select, Information Window
• Table of Contents, Customizable symbology.
• Hyperlinks to images hosted at a url.

Attachment 1

Page 54 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 10 ends

Annual Support Program
The BOSS WEB™ license includes a supplemental support package. The included Client Success Package includes access to one of the CONSULTANT’s analysis mentors whom the CLIENT can call when they forget how to access and perform tasks within the system. The CONSULTANT’s mentor provides further guidance, feedback, and training to ensure the ultimate success of the CLIENT’s staff who is operating the BOSS WEB™ software. As a part of the BOSS WEB™ license subscription, CLIENT staff automatically receive a Client Success Package with up to 20 hours of support supplied on a use it or lose it basis. Additional Support Packages can be provided to the CLIENT on an annual basis if additional support or consulting services are required.

Task 9 Deliverables:

1. BOSS WEBTM – Full configuration conducted in Year 1 at the conclusion of the CONSULTANT’s pavement management report process.

2. BOSS WEBTM – Go-Live

3. Training to be condcted over a series of web meetings to configure the system.

4. Support to be provided to the CLIENT with an annual maximum of 20 hours through the duration of the software license agreement.

Attachment 1

Page 55 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 11 ends

Section II – Scope of Services Budget
The CONSULTANT fee structure for this assignment can be found below with the compiled tasksto illustrate the full scope of this project. The CONSULTANT fees are based on the proposed scope of work.

Assumptions:
• CONSULTANT to consume CLIENT GIS centerline for developing survey mileage. • Arterial, Collector & Industrial roadways will be surveyed once in each direction and the local roadways will be surveyed in a single direction.
• Roads are to be surveyed when free of debris and standing water at temperatures between 40 and 90 degrees Fahrenheit.
• Bill monthly, lump sum based on percent complete for each task item. Fees are inclusive of labor and expenses.

Optional: BOSS WEBTM Annual License for Years 3-5
The following table includes the annual license fees for years 3 through 5 for BOSSTM WEB.

Task Description Units Unit Cost Fee
Item 1: PMP Inventory, Reporting, 1st Year BOSSTM Software 1 Project Initiation and Project Management [Lump Sum] 1 $6,320.00 $6,320.00 2 Field Setup, Centerline Identification & GPS Network Creation [Lump Sum] 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 Collect Roadway Network [Test-Miles] 646 $100.00 $64,600.00 4 Pavement Condition Index (PCI): ASTM D6433 Distress Processing [T-Miles] 646 $40.00 $25,840.00 5 RAS Verification & Pilot Review [Lump Sum] 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 6 Pavement Widths Verification [Lane-Mi] 993 $10.00 $9,930.00 7 Delivery of Inventory Data and PowerBI Portal [Lump Sum] 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 8 Pavement Analysis, Budget Scenarios & Report [Lump Sum] 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 9 BOSS™ WEB Configuration, Deployment, & Training (Year 1 Only) [Lump Sum] 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Annual BOSS License Fees
9-a BOSSTM WEB: Year 1 (2026 Annual Support, Maintenance & License) 1 $17,500.00 $17,500.00 9-b BOSSTM WEB: Year 2 (2027 Annual Support, Maintenance & License) 1 $17,500.00 $17,500.00 $195,190.00
Rancho Cucamonga
RFP #24/25-006 Pavement and Asset Management Program
Item 1 - PMP Inventory and Software Sub-Total:

Optional: BOSSTM WEB Years 3-5
Task Description Units Unit Cost Fee
10 BOSSTM WEB: Year 3 (2028 Annual Support, Maintenance & License) 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 11 BOSSTM WEB: Year 4 (2029 Annual Support, Maintenance & License) 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 12 BOSSTM WEB: Year 5 (2030 Annual Support, Maintenance & License) 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Optional: BOSS $60,000.00 TM WEB Years 3-5 Sub-Total: Attachment 1

Page 56 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 12 ends

Optional: 2027/2028 Re-survey of Major Roads
The following table includes the tasks and fee associated with a partial network survey to update the PCI data and import the data to the City’s BOSS WEBTM software mid-cycle. This set of tasks also includes staff time to update the deterioration curves and import the updated PCI data.

This partial network PCI update and import to BOSS WEBTM would require approximately 4 to 5 months to complete from issuance of NTP.

Project Total for All Services
Should the City elect to conduct the base scope of work and all optional services, the total 5-year project fee is reflected below.

Optional 2027/2028 PCI Update of Major Roads
Task Description Units Unit Cost Fee
13 Setup and Mobilization 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00
14 Collect Roadway Network [Test-Miles] 364 $112.00 $40,768.00 15 Pavement Condition Index (PCI): ASTM D6433 Distress Processing [T-Miles] 364 $45.00 $16,380.00 16 Staff Consulting Hours: Sr. Pavement Consultant (Hours) 16 $275.00 $4,400.00 17 PCI Data Import to BOSSTM WEB 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
2027/2028 PCI Update of Major Roads Sub-Total: $72,048.00 5- Year Project (Base SOW & Options) Total: $327,238.00 Attachment 1

Page 57 ends

Attachment A
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 13 ends

Section III – Scope of Services Schedule & Timeline
CONSULTANT to assign staff and resources to perform the tasks associated with this scope of work to meet the timeline presented below.

Annual Service Milestones
From the projected timeline above, the recurring annual license will be schedule for renewal at the approximate dates.

Milestone Time from NTP Estimated Milestone
Final Report & BOSS WEBTM Go-Live Approx. 9-Months January 2026 Year 1 License BOSS WEBTM Approx. 9-Months January 2026 Year 2 Renewal BOSS WEBTM Approx. 21-Months January 2027 Year 3 Renewal BOSS WEBTM Approx. 33-Months January 2028 Year 4 Renewal BOSS WEBTM Approx. 45-Months January 2029 Year 5 Renewal BOSS WEBTM Approx. 57-Months January 2030 Task Description / Milestone Days
1 Project Initiation and Project Management 7
2 Field Setup, Centerline Identification & GPS Network Creation 14 H 3a Roadway Asset Collection (RAC) Vehicle Mobilization/Calibration 2 H 3b Collect Roadway Network 27 H
4 Pavement Condition Index (PCI): ASTM D6433 Distress Processing 90 5 RAS Verification & Pilot Review 2
6 Pavement Widths Verification 50 H
7 Delivery of Inventory Data and PowerBI Portal 2
8a Pavement Analysis, Budget Scenarios & Report 50
8b City Review of Draft Report & Final PCI Data 15
8c Delivery of Final Report 7
9 BOSS WEBTM Configuration, Deployment & Training 60 H
10 to 12 ROW Asset Inventory Development 100
PM Scheduled Project Status Meetings 10
PM Presentations: Work Group & Council 2
CRITICAL PATH COMPONENTS Prep/GIS Database Work Field Work Client Reviews/Meetings Extraction/Evaluation/QC Work Final Deliverable
Oct Nov
Project Month
May Jun Jul Aug Sept Dec Jan
Attachment 1

Page 58 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Neil Plummer, Public Works Services Director Andy Miller, Facilities Superintendent
Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
Paige Eberle, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Contract with UPSCO for Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) Maintenance Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $20,000 in FY24/25 and $220,000 Over Seven Years. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council award and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with UPSCO to provide Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) maintenance services effective through June 30, 2030, with an option to renew in one (1) year increments up to a total of (2) additional years, in an amount not to exceed $20,000 annually and $250,000 over the duration of the contract.

BACKGROUND:

The Public Works Services Department (PWSD) and the Procurement Division routinely issue requests for proposals to ensure vendor services remain competitive. Public Works staff drafted a detailed scope of work to solicit bids for maintenance services for uninterrupted power supply within all City facilities. Previously, a contract was obtained through an open market bid process with a not to exceed limit of $25,000 for as-needed services. Typically, these services were utilized in an on-call capacity however, due to increasing costs and a need for continual routine maintenance, Public Works solicited bids through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process to increase the spending limit and provide the appropriate level of service. This will assist the Public Works Department in reducing costly repairs and extend the useful life of our equipment through a routine, preventative maintenance program.

PWSD provided the scope of work to the Procurement Division to prepare a formal Request for Proposal (RFP). The Procurement Division prepared and posted RFP #24/25-018 to the City’s automated procurement system. 686 vendors were notified of the solicitation, 40 prospective vendors downloaded or viewed the bid package, and 3 vendors response was received.

ANALYSIS:

An Evaluation Committee consisting of City staff conducted a thorough analysis of the RFP responses and scored and ranked the responsive proposals in accordance with the criteria specified in the RFP. The outcome of the evaluation process determined UPSCO to be the most responsive vendor providing the best value while meeting the scope of services and specifications

Page 59 ends

Page 2 ends

required. Therefore, staff recommends the City Council award a contract to UPSCO through June 30, 2030, and an option to renew in one (1) year increments for a total of two (2) additional years in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for the remainder of FY 24/25 and $250,000 over the duration of the contract, contingent upon approval of future budgets.

If approved, a copy of the executed contract will be on file in the City Clerk’s Office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This contract price is within various operations and contract services accounts in the adopted FY 2024/2025 budget and will be adjusted as necessary contingent upon future budgets.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses City Council’s core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by ensuring City are properly maintained by intentionally embracing and anticipating the future.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Page 60 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer
Krystal Lai, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration to Award a Contract with CT&T Concrete Paving Inc., in the Amount of $1,655,100, Plus a 15% Contingency for the Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project. Consideration to Accept Award in the Amount of $750,000 from San Bernardino County through the County Board Discretionary Fund Priorities Program, and to Authorize an Appropriation in the Amount of $750,000. This Project is Exempt From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project (Project), on file with the City Engineer;

2. Accept the bids received for the Project;

3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $ $1,655,100 to the lowest responsive bidder CT&T Concrete Paving Inc., for the total bid amount;

4. Authorize the expenditure of a 15% contingency for the construction contract, in the amount of $248,270;

5. Accept award in the amount of $750,000 from San Bernardino County through the County Board Discretionary Fund Priorities Program; and

6. Authorize an appropriation of revenues and expenditures, both in the amount of $750,000 from the Infrastructure Fund (Fund 198).

BACKGROUND:

Heritage Park (Park), located in the northwestern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is a center of recreational activity and is uniquely divided into two sections by the Demens Creek Channel. Large numbers of people of all ages visit the park annually as it has multiple recreational areas, including a playground, baseball fields, soccer fields, and a dedicated equestrian arena

Page 61 ends

Page 2 ends

and facility, which is connected to the area’s existing equestrian trail network. The equestrian center area of the Park, because of its size and accessibility to horse trailers as well as a dedicated restroom and community center, also serves as a staging area for emergency response during fire or flooding incidents occurring in the foothills. A Vicinity Map illustrating the location of the Project is included in Attachment 1.

In 2019, a bridge report and structural evaluation was conducted for the three (3) bridges that serve as the main access point over the Demens Creek Channel to the Equestrian Center and Emergency Staging Area of the Park. The evaluation confirmed that all three (3) bridges needed replacement, and after evaluating options, it was determined that the best course of action would be to demolish all three (3) of the existing bridges and replace them with a single bridge structure.

At the present time, those bridges can no longer support the weight of emergency equipment.

The Demens Creek Channel is owned and maintained by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFD). The City has worked extensively over the past four years with SBCFD and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to obtain the necessary permits to begin construction. In August and November 2024, the City received permits from the Army Corps and SBCFD, respectively, granting the City permission to enter their right of way and construct the Project.

In October 2024, the City worked with County Supervisor Jesse Armendarez’s office to provide background on the need for the Project, Project scope, and funding status. It was determined that the Project was suitable for an allocation from the Board of Supervisors Discretionary Fund, filling a funding gap that was created due to higher than anticipated cost estimates. In December 2024, the City received $750,000 from San Bernardino County through the County Board Discretionary Fund Priorities Program, providing for the safety, health, emergency, recreational, and social service needs of county residents.

ANALYSIS:

This Project will construct a new single bridge that will be approximately 50’ wide and span approximately 21’ across the Demens Creek Channel. The new bridge will provide separated areas and pathways for pedestrians, equestrians, and vehicles. In addition, ADA access to the bridge will be maintained with the construction of new pathways, lighting will be upgraded to current City standards, and new landscaping and vegetation will be installed. Once complete, the bridge will provide a critically improved connection to the equestrian center.

The Project’s plans and specifications were completed in early February 2024, and the Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and was published in the Daily Bulletin Newspaper on March 4 and March 11, 2025. The City Clerk’s office and Procurement Department facilitated the formal solicitation for bidding on the project.

On April 1, 2025, 14 construction bids were received on PlanetBids, and two (2) bidders were considered as nonresponsive bidders. The Engineer’s estimate for the project was $2,500,000.

The apparent lowest responsive bid, was determined to be CT&T Concrete Paving Inc., in the amount of $1,655,100. A full bid summary is included as Attachment 1.

Engineering staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder, CT&T Concrete Paving Inc., meets the requirements of the bid documents.

Page 62 ends

Page 3 ends

Given the multitude of active uses in Heritage Park, staff is coordinating with user groups to communicate construction timing and activities with a goal of minimizing impacts where possible while meeting permitting and constructability requirements for the project.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

Staff has determined that the Project is Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 “Existing Facilities” subsection (c), Class 1. A Notice of Exemption was filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for San Bernardino County on September 23, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows:

Expenditure Category Amount
Construction Contract $1,655,100
Construction Contract Contingency (15%) $248,270
Bid Noticing Advertisement $1,570
Estimated Construction Costs $1,904,940
Due to the complex nature of the Project, in February 2025, the City invited qualified consultants to submit a proposal response for Request for Proposals (RFP) for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Project. Once a final consultant is selected, a separate staff report, likely in May 2025, will be prepared to present these recommendations to City Council for consideration.

Additionally, because the scope of the project includes the removal of three existing bridges and limited information could be collected on these bridges, staff is recommending a Construction Contract Contingency of 15%.

A total of $2,400,000 was budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Budget for this Project, consisting of funds from the Citywide Infrastructure Improvement Fund (198) and the Fire Capital Projects Fund (288). Following design and preconstruction expenses, the remaining budget available for the Project is $2,351,480. From this available budget, funds will be allocated for this project as identified under the Capital Improvement Project Account numbers listed below:

Account Number Funding Source Description Amount
F198 CC303 SC7004
PID1963-198
Citywide
Infrastructure
Improvement
Heritage Park Bridge
Replacement Project
$577,470
F288 CC501 SC7004
PID1963-288
Fire Capital Projects Heritage Park Bridge
Replacement Project
$577,470
Total $1,154,940
An additional $750,000 was awarded from San Bernardino County through the County Board Discretionary Fund Priorities Program. Additional appropriations are needed in the following accounts to these funds for the project:

Page 63 ends

Page 4 ends

Account Number Funding Source Description Amount
F198 CC303 RC5102
PID1963-198
San Bernardino
County Board
Discretionary Fund
Priorities Program
County Discretionary
Fund Revenue
$750,000
F198 CC303 SC7004
PID1963-198
Citywide
Infrastructure
Improvement
County Discretionary
Fund Expenditure
$750,000
The remaining budgeted funds will be used for award of the construction management and inspection contract (under a future City Council item) and any excess funds will be returned to fund balances for their associated funds at the end of the fiscal year and will be available for use on future projects.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

The Project addresses the City Council Goal of Enhancing Premier Community Status by ensuring existing community tail facilities are safe to access and use.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Bid Summary

Page 64 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

HERITAGE PARK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

Page 65 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
BID SUMMARY: BID DATE: _____04/01/2025______ APPARENT LOW BIDDER NONRESPONSIVE 2 3 4 5 NONRESPONSIVE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION

ENGINEERING CORP

LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING,
INC.

RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, INC.

BEADOR CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, INC.

GENTRY GENERAL
ENGINEERING, INC.

GRANITE CONSTRUCTION

COMPANY

GOLDEN SUN ENTERPRISE,
INC.

POWER ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION HERITAGE PARK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE CT&T CONCRETE PAVING, INC. KEC ENGINEERING DEARK E&C, INC. LEONIDA BUILDERS, INC. MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC GRIFFITH COMPANY

BASE BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT COST

BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT
COST

BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID

NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
1 1
LS Mobilization $251,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$2,000.00
$35,000.00
$50,000.00
$330.00
$251,000.00 $102,887.75 $102,887.75
$53,261.50
$30,414.74
$9,450.00
$40,405.00
$18,145.00
$31,540.00
$3,820.00
$17,825.00
$29,500.00
$51.00
$40,405.00 $190,000.00 $190,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $160,000.00 $15,000.00 $40,000.00
$20,000.00 $44,000.00
$160,000.00 $100,000.00
$40,000.00 $36,000.00
$44,000.00 $12,000.00
$19,200.00 $12,000.00
$24,000.00 $60,000.00
$30,000.00 $100,000.00
$100,000.00 $222,000.00
$36,000.00 $50,000.00
$12,000.00 $30,000.00
$222,000.00 $70,000.00
$50,000.00 $12,000.00
$30,000.00 $15,000.00
$70,000.00 $20,300.00
$12,000.00 $62,100.00
$15,000.00 $168,000.00
$20,300.00 $180,000.00
$62,100.00 $10,830.65
$180,000.00 $245,987.00
$10,830.65 $10,000.00
$9,500.00 $20,000.00
$245,987.00 $255,000.00
$10,000.00 $35,000.00
$20,000.00 $70,000.00
$255,000.00 $39,245.00
$35,000.00 $63,777.00
$70,000.00 $17,324.00
$39,245.00 $276,900.00
$63,777.00 $30,300.00
$17,324.00 $27,800.00
$276,900.00
$30,300.00
$27,800.00
$38,040.00
$30,700.00
$46,200.00
$11,610.00
$41,412.00
$7,850.00
LS Temporary Water Pollution Control
LS Site Control and Construction Signing
EA ADA Accommodations for Equestrian Center
LS Clearing and Grubbing
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$12,000.00
$35,000.00
$50,000.00
$29,700.00
$126,000.00
$30,000.00
$127,500.00
$2,730.00
$53,261.50
$30,414.74
$1,575.00
$10,463.65
$41,868.11
$106.54
$18,145.00
$31,540.00
$22,920.00
$17,825.00
$29,500.00
$4,590.00
$25,000.00
$7,500.00
$4,400.00
$25,000.00
$45,500.00
$120.00
$25,000.00
$7,500.00
$15,000.00
$20,000.00
$3,000.00
$54,172.50
$75,000.00
$100.00
1 $168,000.00
$13,800.00
$9,500.00
6 $26,400.00 $3,500.00
$25,000.00
$45,500.00
$10,800.00
$67,200.00
$7,500.00
$18,000.00 $3,200.00 $72,000.00 $6,500.00 $39,000.00 $1,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,300.00 $21,000.00 $2,500.00 $15,000.00 $3,700.00 $22,200.00 $1,880.00 $11,280.00 $6,340.00 1 $10,463.65
$41,868.11
$9,588.60
$54,172.50 $24,000.00
$75,000.00 $30,000.00
$60,000.00 $50,000.00
$100,000.00 $50,949.00
$50,000.00 $68,000.00
$50,949.00 $75,000.00
$68,000.00 $20,300.00
$75,000.00 $74,600.00
$20,300.00 $135,719.00
$74,600.00 $142,000.00
$135,719.00 $100,000.00
$142,000.00 $200,000.00
$100,000.00 $50,000.00
$200,000.00 $70,000.00
$50,000.00 $13,464.00
$70,000.00 $61,409.00
$13,464.00 $30,700.00
1 LS Demolition $61,409.00 $46,200.00
90 420
50 510
21 21
458
20 55
132
56 100
CY (F) Structural Excavation (BRIDGE)
CY (F) Structural Excavation (RETAINING WALLS)
CY (F) Structural Backfill (BRIDGE)
$9,000.00
$31,500.00
$5,750.00
$75.00
$75.00
$6,750.00
$31,500.00
$10,000.00
$102,000.00
$4,200.00
$300.00
$300.00
$300.00
$300.00
$240.00
$240.00
$600.00
$400.00
$400.00
$400.00
$400.00
$400.00
$1.20
$27,000.00
$126,000.00
$15,000.00
$153,000.00
$5,040.00
$175.00
$115.00
$370.00
$115.00
$210.00
$210.00
$350.00
$2,660.00
$2,200.00
$2,450.00
$1,400.00
$165.00
$1.85
$15,750.00
$48,300.00
$18,500.00
$58,650.00
$4,410.00
$400.00
$200.00
$500.00
$200.00
$250.00
$250.00
$455.00
$6,000.00
$4,000.00
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
$20.00
$36,000.00
$84,000.00
$25,000.00
$102,000.00
$5,250.00
$385.00
$363.00
$347.00
$347.00
$145.00
$145.00
$556.00
$1,100.00
$1,200.00
$1,100.00
$1,200.00
$172.00
$3.50
$34,650.00
$152,460.00
$17,350.00
$176,970.00
$3,045.00
$30.00
$45.00
$2,700.00
$18,900.00
$11,250.00
$35,700.00
$2,415.00
$1,000.00
$200.00
$200.00
$100.00
$200.00
$200.00
$800.00
$800.00
$800.00
$800.00
$800.00
$800.00
$3.00
$90,000.00
$84,000.00
$10,000.00
$51,000.00
$4,200.00
$125.00
$165.00
$400.00
$235.00
$55.00
$11,250.00
$69,300.00
$20,000.00
$119,850.00
$1,155.00
$176.00
$153.00
$287.00
$150.00
$98.00
$15,840.00
$64,260.00
$14,350.00
$76,500.00
$2,058.00
$129.00
$300.00 $177.49 $74,545.80 $98.60
$9,123.50
$66.75 $28,035.00
$2,900.00
$160.00 $75.00
$600.00 $182.47 $58.00 $150.00 $115.00 $200.00
$200.00
$200.00
$200.00
$350.00
$2,500.00
$4,000.00
$2,500.00
$2,000.00
$30.00
$225.00
$70.00
$157.00
CY (F) Structural Backfill (RETAINING WALLS) $46.00
LF (F) 2-inch Galvanized Steel Pipe (Future Utility) (Bridge) LF (F) 2-inch Galvanized Steel Pipe (Telephone) (Bridge) LF 24" Cast-in-drilled hole Concrete Piling
CY (F) Structural Concrete, Bridge
$250.00 $110.22 $56,212.20
$3,192.00
$57.00 $29,070.00
$6,153.00
$130.00 $66,300.00
$3,255.00
$55.00 $28,050.00
$4,200.00
$23,460.00
$12,390.00
$12,390.00
$297,700.00
$35,200.00
$223,245.00
$322,080.00
$109,200.00
$21,000.00
$84,825.00
$43,200.00
$25,000.00
$50,000.00
$25,000.00
$40,902.00
$7,605.00
$130.00 $152.00 $293.00 $155.00 $200.00 $115.00
$115.00
$330.00
$4,100.00
$3,500.00
$3,200.00
$2,540.00
$5.00
$590.00
$590.00
$650.00
$1,760.00
$4,059.00
$2,440.00
$1,950.00
$210.00
$1.95
$130.00 $2,730.00 $152.00 $3,192.00 $293.00 $6,153.00 $155.00 $3,255.00 $200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $5,040.00 $4,410.00 $5,250.00 $3,045.00 $2,415.00 $4,200.00 $55.00 $1,155.00 $98.00 $2,058.00 $600.00 $274,800.00
$140,000.00
$220,000.00
$264,000.00
$78,400.00
$11,000.00
$152,250.00
$48,000.00
$13,000.00
$13,000.00
$13,000.00
$25,500.00
$7,020.00
$384.92 $176,293.36
$40,028.00
$95,438.20
$150,754.56
$52,138.80
$14,910.00
$50,025.00
$33,280.00
$23,985.26
$17,991.16
$17,991.16
$26,775.00
$4,709.25
$680.00 $311,440.00
$23,860.00
$132,330.00
$210,276.00
$88,256.00
$1,140.00
$540.00 $247,320.00
$31,000.00
$134,750.00
$211,200.00
$56,000.00
$2,500.00
$350.00 $160,300.00
$30,000.00
$137,500.00
$277,200.00
$49,280.00
$2,000.00
$160,300.00
$50,000.00
$220,000.00
$330,000.00
$112,000.00
$3,000.00
$274,800.00
$8,000.00
$160,300.00
$53,200.00
$121,000.00
$323,400.00
$78,400.00
$16,500.00
$80,475.00
$41,600.00
$208,390.00
$120,000.00
$220,000.00
$396,000.00
$168,000.00
$2,000.00
$254,648.00
$22,000.00
$66,000.00
$145,200.00
$67,200.00
$17,200.00
$152,250.00
$89,600.00
$151,140.00
$82,000.00
$192,500.00
$422,400.00
$142,240.00
$500.00
$366,400.00
$16,000.00
$44,000.00
$105,600.00
$44,800.00
$80,000.00
$130,500.00
$48,000.00
$450.00
$1,900.00
$4,000.00
$1,350.00
$1,500.00
$65.00
$206,100.00
$38,000.00
$220,000.00
$178,200.00
$84,000.00
$6,500.00
$740.00
$3,513.00
$4,706.00
$2,220.00
$3,258.00
$57.00
$338,920.00
$70,260.00
$258,830.00
$293,040.00
$182,448.00
$5,700.00
$7,000.00
$4,000.00
$2,000.00
$1,400.00
$110.00
$2,001.40
$1,735.24
$1,142.08
$931.05
$1,193.00
$2,406.00
$1,593.00
$1,576.00
$11.40
$1,550.00
$2,450.00
$1,600.00
$1,000.00
$25.00
$1,500.00
$2,500.00
$2,100.00
$880.00
CY (F) Structural Concrete, Bridge (Polymer Fiber)
CY (F) Structural Concrete, Retaining Wall
CY (F) Structural Concrete, Approach Slab, (Type N Modified) CY Type A Joint Seal (MR 1/2")
$22,000.00
$52,800.00
$22,400.00
$40,000.00
$52,200.00
$19,200.00
$149.10 $20.00
19 43,500
20 16,000
LB (F) Bar reinforcing steel (Bridge) $3.50 $1.15 $1.49 $64,815.00 $43,360.00
$27,880.00
$40,442.00
$28,355.00
$34,782.00
$6,123.00
$1.75 $76,125.00
$40,000.00
$25,000.00
$45,000.00
$25,000.00
$30,804.00
$5,616.00
$1.90 $82,650.00
$43,200.00
$1.50 $65,250.00
$35,200.00
$0.50 $21,750.00
$8,000.00
$1.10 $47,850.00
$32,000.00
$2.00 $87,000.00
$40,000.00
$2.00 $87,000.00
LB (F) Bar Reinforcing Steel (Retaining Wall) $48,000.00 LS (F) Bridge Removal, Location A
$3.00 $2.08 $2.71 $2.50 $2.70 $2.20 $1.20 $2.60 $0.50 $5.60 $2.00 $3.00 $2.50 $3.00 $2.70 21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
1 $13,000.00
$13,000.00
$13,000.00
$250.00
$23,985.26
$17,991.16
$17,991.16
$262.50
$27,880.00
$40,442.00
$28,355.00
$341.00
$25,000.00
$45,000.00
$25,000.00
$302.00
$16,000.00
$30,000.00
$20,000.00
$410.00
$16,000.00 $50,000.00
$30,000.00 $50,000.00
$20,000.00 $50,000.00
$50,000.00 $72,000.00
$50,000.00 $96,000.00
$50,000.00 $72,000.00
$72,000.00 $12,500.00
$96,000.00 $40,000.00
$72,000.00 $12,000.00
$12,500.00 $30,000.00
$40,000.00 $30,000.00
$12,000.00 $30,000.00
$30,000.00 $16,500.00
$30,000.00 $19,500.00
$30,000.00 $16,000.00
$16,500.00 $19,460.00
$19,500.00 $12,360.00
$16,000.00 $13,260.00
$19,460.00 $50,000.00
$12,360.00 $50,000.00
$13,260.00 $50,000.00
$50,000.00 $45,000.00
$50,000.00 $90,000.00
$50,000.00 $55,000.00
$45,000.00 $17,406.00
$90,000.00 $50,650.00
$55,000.00 $22,991.00
$17,406.00 $25,000.00
$50,650.00 $50,000.00
$22,991.00 $25,000.00
LS (F) Bridge Removal, Location B
1 LS (F) Bridge Removal, Location C
102
39 63
60 LF Chain link railing (Type 7) $41,820.00
$7,800.00
$34,650.00
$13,800.00
$270.00
$125.00
$465.00
$128.00
$27,540.00
$4,875.00
$29,295.00
$7,680.00
$300.00
$300.00
$360.00
$360.00
$30,600.00
$11,700.00
$22,680.00
$21,600.00
$36,000.00
$590.00
$280.00
$60,180.00
$10,920.00
$69,300.00
$63,000.00
$5,500.00
$400.00
$250.00
$600.00
$600.00
$4,000.00
$40,800.00
$9,750.00
$37,800.00
$36,000.00
$650.00
$290.00
$66,300.00
$11,310.00
$78,120.00
$72,000.00
$250.00
$115.00
$430.00
$117.80
$25,500.00
$4,485.00
$27,090.00
$7,068.00
$300.00
$300.00
$300.00
$300.00
$30,600.00
$11,700.00
$18,900.00
$18,000.00
$300.00
$135.00
$450.00
$125.00
$30,600.00
$5,265.00
$28,350.00
$7,500.00
$371.00
$187.00
$637.00
$184.00
$37,842.00
$7,293.00
$40,131.00
$11,040.00
$401.00
$195.00
$541.00
$233.00
LF (F) Cable railing $180.00 $120.75 $157.00 $144.00 $200.00 LF (F) Chain Link Railing Type 6. $250.00 $15,750.00
$10,800.00
$10,000.00
$451.50 $28,444.50
$7,421.40
$586.00 $36,918.00
$9,660.00
$474.00 $29,862.00
$8,040.00
$550.00 $1,100.00
$1,050.00
$5,500.00
$1,240.00
$1,200.00
$34,083.00
$13,980.00
$55,600.00
LF (F) Chain link fencing on top of Demens Creek Channel (F) Miscellaneous Metal (Base Plate and incidentals to support Chain link fencing on LS
$180.00 $123.69 $161.00 $134.00 $230.00
$10,000.00 $11,304.00 $11,304.00 $12,836.00 $12,836.00 $15,500.00 $15,500.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $36,000.00 $4,000.00 $35,600.00 $35,600.00 $13,435.00 $13,435.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $24,075.00 $24,075.00 $55,600.00 28 1 top of Demens Creek Channel)
29 30
31 32
33 34
42 21
21 1
LF (F) Concrete Barrier - TYPE 732SW (MOD)
LF (F) Concrete barrier - TYPE 836 (MOD)
LF (F) Concrete barrier -TYPE 842 (MOD)
LS (F) Earthwork
$700.00
$500.00
$29,400.00
$10,500.00
$12,600.00
$144,000.00
$12,180.00
$45,000.00
$25,000.00
$536.80
$573.89
$22,545.60
$12,051.69
$12,640.32
$45,101.00
$10,879.35
$67,215.17
$35,619.00
$604.00
$538.00
$25,368.00
$11,298.00
$11,970.00
$650.00
$650.00
$650.00
$27,300.00
$13,650.00
$13,650.00
$610.00
$500.00
$800.00
$25,620.00
$10,500.00
$16,800.00
$750.00
$450.00
$750.00
$31,500.00
$9,450.00
$15,750.00
$360.00
$360.00
$360.00
$15,120.00
$7,560.00
$7,560.00
$580.00
$580.00
$580.00
$24,360.00
$12,180.00
$12,180.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$42,000.00
$21,000.00
$21,000.00
$524.00
$410.00
$571.00
$22,008.00
$8,610.00
$11,991.00
$672.00
$800.00
$483.00
$28,224.00
$16,800.00
$10,143.00
$500.00
$500.00
$500.00
$21,000.00
$10,500.00
$10,500.00
$650.00
$425.00
$500.00
$27,300.00
$8,925.00
$10,500.00
$724.00
$417.00
$771.00
$30,408.00
$8,757.00
$16,191.00
$750.00
$490.00
$500.00
$31,500.00
$10,290.00
$10,500.00
$94,200.00
$38,454.00
$135,500.00
$18,700.00
$600.00 $601.92 $570.00
$144,000.00
$140.00
$45,101.00
$125.05
$69,832.00
$222.00
$69,832.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $202,000.00 $202,000.00 $50,000.00 $19,140.00 $120.00
$50,000.00 $130,000.00
$10,440.00 $300.00
$80,000.00 $36,000.00
$130,000.00 $30,000.00
$26,100.00 $300.00
$30,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $32,000.00
$26,100.00 $283.00
$32,000.00 $162,000.00
$24,621.00 $372.00
$162,000.00 $100,000.00
$32,364.00 $100.00
$100,000.00 $140,000.00
$8,700.00 $265.00
$140,000.00 $32,985.00
$23,055.00 $929.00
$32,985.00 $94,200.00
87UARE YAMinor concrete - 6 -inch thick concrete sidewalk/slope $19,314.00 $80,823.00 $442.00 $83,322.00
$22,075.00
$175.00
$35,000.00
$7,000.00
$15,225.00
$35,000.00
$7,000.00
$220.00
$75,000.00
$20,000.00
$26,100.00
$45,000.00
$300.00
1 LS Stairway, handrails and all incidentals $45,000.00 $25,000.00
$67,215.17
$35,619.00
$83,322.00
$22,075.00
$75,000.00 $80,000.00
$20,000.00 $12,000.00
$36,000.00 $45,000.00
$2,400.00 $40,000.00
$6,000.00 $6,000.00 $35,000.00
$15,000.00 $18,500.00
$35,000.00 $70,000.00
$18,500.00 $16,200.00
$70,000.00 $30,000.00
$16,200.00 $21,000.00
$30,000.00 $100,000.00
$21,000.00 $16,000.00
$100,000.00 $97,044.00
$16,000.00 $13,472.00
$97,044.00 $135,500.00
6-inch diameter removable bollards, including foundations - total of six (6) bollards at $12,000.00 $2,400.00 $40,000.00 $15,000.00 $13,472.00 $18,700.00 35 1 LS two separate locations - three (3) bollards at EA location 36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
95 TONS 4-inch thick asphaltic concrete pavement $180.00 $250.00
$12.00
$17,100.00
$14,750.00
$16,920.00
$5,760.00
$12,600.00
$300.00
$284.02
$199.00
$16.90
$26,981.90
$11,741.00
$23,829.00
$12,011.40
$8,085.00
$900.00
$379.00
$161.00
$23.00
$36,005.00
$9,499.00
$32,430.00
$13,500.00
$10,500.00
$2,671.00
$8,604.00
$14,175.00
$9,900.00
$7,454.00
$5,571.00
$322.00
$225.00
$22.00
$30,590.00
$13,275.00
$31,020.00
$12,600.00
$10,990.00
$6,600.00
$5,050.00
$5,796.00
$5,720.00
$13,600.00
$4,620.00
$175.00
$220.00
$16.00
$16,625.00
$12,980.00
$22,560.00
$9,000.00
$16,100.00
$900.00
$280.00
$150.00
$9.00
$26,600.00
$8,850.00
$12,690.00
$7,200.00
$8,260.00
$1,500.00
$6,000.00
$9,450.00
$6,600.00
$333.60
$240.00
$21.60
$31,692.00
$14,160.00
$30,456.00
$17,280.00
$4,200.00
$360.00
$350.00
$240.00
$16.00
$33,250.00
$14,160.00
$22,560.00
$18,360.00
$19,600.00
$2,300.00
$8,000.00
$5,040.00
$3,520.00
$8,500.00
$5,400.00
$300.00
$100.00
$10.00
$28,500.00
$5,900.00
$14,100.00
$8,100.00
$7,000.00
$6,000.00
$4,000.00
$6,300.00
$4,400.00
$437.00
$336.00
$11.00
$41,515.00
$19,824.00
$15,510.00
$9,720.00
$20,860.00
$2,400.00
$5,600.00
$9,166.50
$6,402.00
$14,600.00
$5,100.00
$445.00
$385.00
$36.00
$42,275.00
$22,715.00
$50,760.00
$22,500.00
$7,700.00
$820.00
$400.00
$150.00
$30.00
$38,000.00
$8,850.00
$42,300.00
$27,000.00
$21,000.00
$2,000.00
$3,000.00
$3,150.00
$2,200.00
$400.00
$200.00
$18.00
$38,000.00
$11,800.00
$25,380.00
$8,100.00
$10,500.00
$900.00
$404.00
$262.00
$26.00
$38,380.00
$15,458.00
$36,660.00
$30,600.00
$11,200.00
$991.00
$279.00
$323.00
$22.20
$26,505.00
$19,057.00
$31,302.00
$17,550.00
$16,310.00
$933.00
59 1,410
180
70 CY 5 -inch thick crushed aggregate base
SF 4-inch thick concrete pavement
LF A1-8 curb per City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Plan 104 LF PVC 2-rail fence per City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Plan 1010-A LS Addition of caps to the ends of the existing horizontal PVC fence EA Traffic rated pull boxes and all incidentals
$32.00 $66.73 $75.00 $70.00 $50.00 $40.00 $96.00 $102.00 $280.00
$2,300.00
$4,000.00
$80.00
$45.00 $54.00 $125.00
$110.00
$820.00
$2,940.00
$148.00
$148.00
$5,000.00
$1,269.00
$150.00
$300.00
$2,000.00
$1,500.00
$50.00
$45.00 $170.00
$160.00
$991.00
$4,273.00
$215.00
$215.00
$97.50
$180.00
$300.00
$1,200.00
$130.00
$130.00
$10,000.00
$750.00
$115.50
$900.00
$3,087.00
$7.35
$150.00
$2,671.00
$4,302.00
$225.00
$225.00
$7,454.00
$1,857.00
$157.00
$6,600.00
$2,525.00
$92.00
$230.00
$900.00
$4,000.00
$90.00
$118.00
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
$150.00
$150.00
$5,500.00
$1,500.00
$60.00 $100.00
$6,000.00
$2,000.00
$100.00
$100.00
$4,000.00
$1,000.00
$298.00
$2,400.00
$2,800.00
$145.50
$145.50
$150.00
$900.00
$2,500.00
$35.00
$233.00
$933.00
$2,710.00
$231.00
$83.00
1 $360.00
$1,200.00
$60.00
2 $2,400.00
$8,190.00
$5,720.00
$10,000.00
$2,250.00
$6,174.00
$463.05
$8,000.00
$5,670.00
$3,960.00
$8,400.00
$4,800.00
$2,400.00
$3,780.00
$2,640.00
$36,000.00
$7,200.00
$5,880.00
$9,324.00
$6,512.00
$5,000.00
$3,807.00
$5,000.00
$2,205.00
$2,200.00
$8,546.00
$13,545.00
$9,460.00
$5,420.00
$14,553.00
$3,652.00
$11,800.00
$5,100.00
63 LF 2-inch Plastic Pipe (Schedule 80) (Future Utility) (Bridge) LF 2-inch Plastic Pipe (Schedule 80) (Telephone) (Bridge) LS Telephone Line Realignment
44 $12.60 $554.40 $130.00
$13,600.00
$1,540.00
$90.00 $60.00 $80.00 $50.00 $50.00
1 $12,983.25
$1,470.00
$12,983.25
$4,410.00
$8,400.00
$1,600.00
$5,500.00 $36,000.00 $8,500.00
$1,800.00
$4,000.00 $14,600.00 $5,000.00
$1,500.00
$5,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $16,821.00 $16,821.00 $11,800.00 Street light handhole/ pullbox per City of Rancho Cucamonga Standard Plan 413 - $4,500.00 $2,400.00 $3,000.00 $1,700.00 $4,500.00 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,844.00 $5,532.00 $1,700.00 46 47 48
3 1
1 EA Caltrans Standard Size 5 by Brooks.

EA Pull Box (Telephone) $750.00 $750.00 $3,837.75
$4,790.32
$3,837.75
$4,790.32
$1,603.00 $1,603.00 $1,612.00
$3,900.00
$1,612.00
$3,900.00
$1,600.00
$5,500.00
$1,600.00
$5,500.00
$1,500.00
$2,000.00
$1,500.00
$2,000.00
$1,800.00
$9,600.00
$1,800.00
$9,600.00
$1,600.00
$8,250.00
$1,600.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,750.00
$7,700.00
$1,750.00
$7,700.00
$1,075.00
$9,250.00
$1,075.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,750.00
$2,500.00
$1,750.00
$2,500.00
$1,564.00
$1,443.00
$1,564.00
$1,443.00
$1,750.00
$6,240.00
$1,750.00
Curb ramp per Caltrans Standard Plan A88A -Case F, including the detectable $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $11,615.00 $11,615.00 $8,250.00 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 $9,250.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $6,240.00 LS warning surface
49 50
1 LS Relocation of double gate - includes footings for the end posts SF Decomposed Granite Paving, 4" Thick Stabilized
$15,000.00
$10.00
$15,000.00
$3,300.00
$12,000.00
$7,577.49
$7.88
$7,577.49
$2,600.40
$3,990.00
$9,375.00
$10.50
$9,375.00
$3,465.00
$4,440.00
$7,000.00
$10.00
$7,000.00
$3,300.00
$11,000.00
$17,000.00
$11.00
$17,000.00
$3,630.00
$3,300.00
$7,500.00
$8.00
$7,500.00
$2,640.00
$6,000.00
$9.60
$6,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00
$2,739.00
$3,300.00
$3,000.00
$25.00
$3,000.00 $24,500.00 $24,500.00
$1,386.00
$3,500.00
$6,880.00
$3.50
$6,880.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
$6,600.00
$10,000.00
$9,000.00
$10.00
$9,000.00
$3,300.00
$3,500.00
$4,313.00
$6.00
$4,313.00 $17,300.00 $17,300.00
$9,042.00
$3,590.00
330 $3,168.00 $8.30 $8,250.00
$5,000.00
$4.20 $1,155.00 $20.00 $1,980.00
$8,793.00
$27.40
Pavement makings and striping - Removal and replacement - Includes red curb $12,000.00 $3,990.00 $4,440.00 $11,000.00 $3,300.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $3,300.00 $5,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $10,000.00 $3,500.00 $8,793.00 $3,590.00 51 52 53
1 1
3 LS painting
LS Traffic signs and signage - See project specifications $35,000.00 $12,000.00
$35,000.00
$36,000.00
$6,683.25 $6,683.25 $9,415.00 $9,415.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $7,150.00 $7,150.00 $6,000.00 $8,000.00
$6,000.00 $9,800.00 $9,800.00 $6,365.00
$9,200.00
$6,365.00 $10,000.00
$27,600.00 $10,000.00
$10,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $11,859.00
$48,000.00 $13,369.00
$11,859.00 $9,950.00 $9,950.00
Lights - Includes light foundation, light post, luminaire, conduits and wiring serving $16,054.50 $48,163.50 $13,461.00 $40,383.00 $16,820.00 $50,460.00 $14,500.00 $43,500.00 $10,000.00 $30,000.00 $24,000.00 $72,000.00 $14,000.00 $42,000.00 $24,000.00 $18,000.00 $54,000.00 $30,000.00 $16,000.00 $40,107.00 $18,100.00 $54,300.00 EA the light - See Project Specifications 54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 2
3 EA Landscape Boulder - 24" to 30" $400.00
$525.00
$600.00
$400.00
$1,000.00
$11.00
$800.00
$1,575.00
$1,800.00
$1,200.00
$1,000.00
$10,098.00
$735.00
$367.50
$446.25
$735.00
$931.35
$1,935.15
$16.91
$735.00
$1,338.75
$2,205.00
$2,794.05
$1,935.15
$15,523.38
$888.72
$481.00
$584.00
$962.00
$1,219.00
$2,533.00
$22.00
$962.00
$1,752.00
$2,886.00
$3,657.00
$2,533.00
$20,196.00
$1,155.00
$1,722.00
$2,730.00
$2,720.00
$8,217.00
$16,800.00
$13,603.00
$8,356.00
$10,309.00
$7,567.00
$350.00
$165.00
$314.00
$770.00
$1,189.00
$17.60
$700.00
$495.00
$700.00
$760.00
$820.00
$1,000.00
$1,800.00
$25.00
$1,400.00
$2,280.00
$2,460.00
$3,000.00
$1,800.00
$22,950.00
$1,050.00
$640.00
$380.00
$460.00
$760.00
$960.00
$2,000.00
$17.00
$760.00
$1,380.00
$2,280.00
$2,880.00
$2,000.00
$15,606.00
$903.00
$420.00
$510.00
$840.00
$1,065.00
$2,200.00
$18.00
$840.00
$1,530.00
$2,520.00
$3,195.00
$2,200.00
$16,524.00
$945.00
$385.00
$475.00
$770.00
$990.00
$2,090.00
$18.00
$770.00
$1,425.00
$2,310.00
$2,970.00
$2,090.00
$16,524.00
$987.00
$800.00
$1,000.00
$1,200.00
$1,000.00
$3,000.00
$100.00
$1,600.00
$3,000.00
$3,600.00
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
$91,800.00
$2,520.00
$1,040.00
$10,000.00
$4,000.00
$4,150.00
$37,800.00
$30,500.00
$11,489.50
$3,000.00
$8,050.00
$440.00
$181.00
$345.00
$850.00
$1,300.00
$19.00
$880.00
$543.00
$360.00
$150.00
$285.00
$700.00
$1,081.00
$16.00
$720.00
$450.00
$300.00
$400.00
$500.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$15.00
$600.00
$1,200.00
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
$2,000.00
$13,770.00
$525.00
$450.00
$550.00
$920.00
$1,000.00
$1,500.00
$20.00
$900.00
$1,650.00
$2,760.00
$3,000.00
$1,500.00
$18,360.00
$1,050.00
$1,600.00
$1,200.00
$2,600.00
$7,885.00
$16,800.00
$24,400.00
$16,712.00
$10,000.00
$28,980.00
$662.00
$311.00
$507.00
$1,110.00
$1,849.00
$24.00
$1,324.00
$933.00
$1,320.00
$1,640.00
$2,190.00
$1,860.00
$2,850.00
$21.90
$2,640.00
$4,920.00
$6,570.00
$5,580.00
$2,850.00
$20,104.20
$1,150.80
$2,632.00
$2,960.00
$1,708.00
$4,548.40
$23,016.00
$46,421.00
$9,191.60
$9,320.00
$17,066.00
EA Landscape Boulder - 30" to 36"
3 EA Landscape Boulder - 36" to 48" $942.00 $1,035.00
$2,550.00
$1,300.00
$17,442.00
$1,018.50
$1,744.00
$969.00
$855.00 $1,521.00
$3,330.00
$1,849.00
$22,032.00
$1,491.00
$2,368.00
$1,441.00
$3,184.00
$6,308.00
$14,280.00
$27,999.00
$20,890.00
$6,674.00
$15,134.00
3 EA 24" Box Tree $2,310.00
$1,189.00
$16,156.80
$924.00
$2,100.00
$1,081.00
$14,688.00
$840.00
1 EA 36" Box Tree
918
21 8
EA 1 Gallon Shrub
EA 5 Gallon Shrub $35.00 $42.32 $55.00 $44.00 $50.00 $43.00 $45.00 $47.00 $120.00 $48.50 $40.00 $25.00 $50.00 $71.00 $54.80 EA 15 Gallon Shrub $120.00
$550.00
$250.00
$70.00
$960.00 $164.43
$1,990.80
$519.75
$75.60
$1,315.44
$1,990.80
$2,079.00
$6,274.80
$12,616.80
$20,329.47
$5,932.76
$8,452.50
$13,127.94
$215.25
$2,730.00
$680.00
$99.00
$200.00
$10,000.00
$550.00
$52.00
$1,600.00
$10,000.00
$2,200.00
$4,316.00
$10,920.00
$23,180.00
$12,534.00
$5,000.00
$36,225.00
$80.00 $170.00
$2,200.00
$535.00
$78.00
$1,360.00
$2,200.00
$2,140.00
$6,474.00
$13,020.00
$12,505.00
$6,267.00
$10,000.00
$14,490.00
$185.00
$230.00
$550.00
$80.00
$1,480.00
$230.00
$180.00
$2,200.00
$550.00
$80.00
$1,440.00 $130.00 $218.00
$969.00
$606.00
$60.00
$180.00
$800.00
$500.00
$50.00
$1,440.00
$800.00
$50.00 $400.00 $200.00
$1,200.00
$650.00
$95.00
$296.00
$1,441.00
$796.00
$76.00
$329.00
$2,960.00
$427.00
$54.80
1 EA Remote Control Valve - 2" in Valve Box
EA Quick Coupler Valve in Valve Box - 1"
EA Pop-Up-Spray Head
$550.00 $1,000.00
$500.00
$65.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$5,395.00
$4,200.00
$21,350.00
$7,311.50
$2,200.00 $10,000.00 $1,000.00
$500.00
$150.00
$20.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$12,450.00
$16,800.00
$18,300.00
$10,445.00
4 $1,000.00
$5,810.00
$4,200.00
$4,270.00
$10,445.00
$3,000.00
$24,150.00
$2,200.00
$6,640.00
$13,440.00
$14,640.00
$6,267.00
$8,000.00
$38,640.00
$2,200.00
$6,640.00
$13,440.00
$27,450.00
$6,267.00
$8,250.00
$10,948.00
$1,000.00
$50.00
$2,424.00
$4,980.00
$11,256.00
$22,875.00
$16,712.00
$4,600.00
$35,098.00
$2,000.00
$4,150.00
$9,240.00
$35,563.00
$12,534.00
$3,830.00
$378.35
83 840
61 4,178
1 LF Lateral PVC Pipe (3/4" to 2-1/2")
LF Keystone Gravity Retaining Wall
SF 3" Shredded Mulch - Hand Placed
LS 90 Day Landscape Maintenance Period
Subdrain per Caltrans Standard Plan B9-6, Detail C - Footing (MOD) - with 4" slotted LF plastic pipe. Includes geocomposite drain, filter fabric, slotted plastic pipe, treated permeable base, and all incidentals
$5.00 $15.02 $20.00 $13.00 $5.00 $15.50 $16.00 $16.00 $45.00 $13.40 $11.00 $20.00 $17.00 $27.40 $70.00 $333.27
$1.42
$223.00
$2.00
$380.00
$3.00
$350.00
$1.75
$205.00
$1.50
$240.00
$1.50
$450.00
$1.50
$500.00
$2.75
$375.00
$4.00
$583.00
$3.00
$300.00
$2.50
$400.00
$4.00
$459.00
$5.00
$761.00
$2.50 $2.20
$3,000.00
$150.00
$8,452.50
$81.54
$10,309.00
$47.00
$5,000.00
$225.00
$7,500.00
$22.00
$7,500.00 $10,000.00 $8,000.00
$240.00
$8,250.00
$68.00
$3,000.00
$50.00
$4,600.00
$218.00
$3,830.00
$2.35
$5,000.00
$100.00
$5,000.00 $10,000.00 $6,674.00
$94.00
$9,320.00
$3,542.00 $90.00 $16,100.00 $180.00 $106.00
69 161
70 71
104
36 LF 4" plastic pipe underdrain - includes sweeps and fittings LF 3" plastic pipe underdrain - includes sweeps and fittings $45.00
$35.00
$4,680.00
$1,260.00
$34.17 $3,553.68
$6,482.88
$64.00 $6,656.00
$4,266.00
$65.00 $6,760.00
$4,320.00
$25.00
$24.00
$2,600.00
$864.00
$150.00
$150.00
$15,600.00
$5,400.00
$60.00
$48.00
$6,240.00
$1,728.00
$79.00 $8,216.00
$3,780.00
$40.00
$38.00
$4,160.00
$1,368.00
$138.00
$129.00
$14,352.00
$4,644.00
$80.00 $8,320.00 $100.00
$100.00
$10,400.00
$3,600.00
$150.00
$200.00
$15,600.00
$7,200.00
$73.00
$46.00
$7,592.00
$1,656.00
$123.00
$175.00
$12,792.00
$180.08 $118.50 $120.00 $105.00 $304.00 $10,944.00 $6,300.00 TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT: $2,545,433.00 $1,655,093.46 $1,899,580.00 $2,048,156.80 $2,080,000.00 $2,175,685.00 $2,189,795.00 $2,275,700.00 $2,412,717.50 $2,426,534.00 $2,444,000.00 $2,464,777.00 $2,550,037.00 $2,554,129.00 $2,720,940.00

Page 66 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

REVISION:

On April 1, 2025, bids were opened for the Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project (Project).

A total of 14 construction bids were received on PlanetBids, the City’s electronic bidding software, but two (2) bidders were considered nonresponsive bidders. City staff determined the apparent lowest responsive bidder to be CT&T Concrete Paving Inc. (CT&T), in the amount of $1,655,100.

On April 15, 2025, the City Clerk’s Office received a bid protest letter from Wright Construction Engineering Corp. (Protester). The letter claimed that the bid package submitted by the CT&T should be deemed nonresponsive due to a lack of required experience and a failure to list mandatory subcontractors. The Protestor alleges that the three projects provided by the CT&T on the bid forms are not similar work to the Project and therefore do not demonstrate CT&T’s ability to successfully perform the Contract. The Protestor also alleges that CT&T failed to list a subcontractor for land surveying and that CT&T does not hold a California Land Surveyors License, thereby rendering them unqualified to perform the contract. The protest letter is included as Attachment 1.

CT&T provide a formal response to the protest letter indicating that they have completed multiple projects of similar size and scope and included examples of these projects. CT&T clarified that they contracted On-Point Land Surveying, Inc., a firm with Licensed Land Surveyors on staff, for the surveying portion of the Project. However, the portion of the survey work does not exceed

0.5% and therefore they were not required to list them as a Subcontractor on the bid forms per the Instruction to Bidders. The response letter is included as Attachment 2.

Engineering staff has reviewed both the protest letter and the response letter. Staff have determined that the bid package submitted by CT&T is responsive and in accordance with the bid requirements, with any irregularities being inconsequential. CT&T is therefore still the apparent lowest responsive bidder for the Project.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Receive and file this Memorandum and item D9 of the Consent Calendar, waive any minor irregularities,

2. Approve the plans and specifications for the Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project (Project), on file with the City Engineer;
DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer
Krystal Lai, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Bid Protest Letter from Wright Construction Engineering Corp. and Response Letter from CT&T Concrete Paving Inc. for the Heritage Park Bridge Replacment Project. (CITY)

MEMORANDUM
Engineering Services Department
Staff Report Memo: 4/16/2025 Item D9 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM

Page 67 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

3. Accept the bids received for the Project;

4. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $ $1,655,100 to the lowest responsive bidder CT&T Concrete Paving Inc., for the total bid amount;

5. Authorize the expenditure of a 15% contingency for the construction contract, in the amount of $248,270;

6. Accept award in the amount of $750,000 from San Bernardino County through the County Board Discretionary Fund Priorities Program; and

7. Authorize an appropriation of revenues and expenditures, both in the amount of $750,000 from the Infrastructure Fund (Fund 198).

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Protest Letter from Wright Construction Engineering Corp.

Attachment 2 – Response Letter from CT&T Concrete Paving Inc.

Page 68 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 69 ends

Page 70 ends

Page 71 ends

Page 72 ends

Page 73 ends

April 16th, 2025
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Dr.,
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Heritage Bridge Replacement Project
Subject: Response to Formal Bid Protest
To Whom It May Concern:

Introduction
This letter serves as CT&T Concrete Paving Inc.’s (CT&T) response to a protest of award letter submitted by Wright Construction Engineering Corp. on April 15th, 2025. In this letter we will address the following claims made by Wright Construction Engineering Corp: (1) CT&T fails to meet the minimum qualifications and lacks the required experience to perform the job; (2) CT&T failed to list a subcontractor for a key component of the project.

1. CT&T Fails to Meet the Minimum Qualifications
Wright Construction Engineering Corp. posits that the three recently completed projects listed by CT&T Concrete Paving Inc. fail to meet and/or match the scope of work that was specified within the contract documents. Section H (Competency of Bidders) of the Instructions to Bidders for the Heritage Bridge Replacement Project states that:
“The bidder shall be licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9, Division 3, of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California to do the type of work contemplated in the contract and shall be skilled and regularly engaged in the general class or type of work called for under this contract.”
In response to this, CT&T listed three recently completed projects, over $1,000,000 that required a Class A (General Engineering) contractor’s license. The scopes of work on the aforementioned projects demonstrate CT&T Concrete Paving’s ability to complete General Engineering work in the public sector on a larger scale. CT&T Concrete Paving Inc. has performed General Engineering work in both the public and private sector for various agencies. Please see additional references highlighting CT&T Concrete Paving’s ability to perform work of a similar nature:
a. City of Cathedral City (2019)
i. CV Link – White Water Bike Path, Project No. 7015
324 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., PMB275
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Office (909) 629-8000 Fax (909) 629-8001
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 74 ends

ii. Construction of a 3.5 Mile Bike Trail with 3 Underpass Bridge Structures iii. Contact: Bill Simmons, PE (760)770-0360
b. Orange County Public Works Department (2023)
i. Olive Heights Sidewalk Gap Closure, Agreement No. MA-080-22011013 ii. Construction of sidewalk and structural retaining wall to improve accessibility in an unincorpated community in the County of Orange iii. Contact: Teddy Kamarzarian, PE (714) 955-0315
c. 2021 Laguna Beach Mixed Use Project
i. 1369 Coast Highway, Laguna Beach, CA
ii. Construction of 14,000 SF Structural Concrete Podium Deck iii. Contact: Jaik Choi, PE (949) 951-2522

2. CT&T Failed to List Mandatory Subcontractors
To clarify, CT&T intends to subcontract On-Point Land Surveying, Inc. (LS 8133) for the surveying portion of the project, specifically for the survey control, walls, and bridge abutments as required by the project requirements. The portion of the work does not exceed the 0.5% of the bid amount. CT&T Concrete Paving Inc. has included in their budget a contingency amount if additional surveying is required throughout the course of construction.

3. Conclusion
For the reasons stated above, CT&T maintains their status as a responsive bidder. CT&T Concrete Paving Inc. trusts the City of Rancho Cucamonga to perform its due diligence on each contractor who has submitted a bid for the above referenced project. We appreciate your time and attention to this matter.

Jose Carvajal
President
CT&T Concrete Paving Inc.

CC: Jackie Carvajal, Officer
Jose Carvajal

Page 75 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Vishal Lad, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Contract with American Asphalt South, Inc. in the Amount of $349,400 Plus a 10% Contingency for Construction and Construction Management and Inspection Services, for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project. This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project) on file with the City Engineer;

2. Accept the bids received for the Project;

3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $349,400 to the lowest responsive bidder, American Asphalt South, Inc., for the total bid amount;

4. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency for the construction contract, totaling $34,490;
BACKGROUND:

The City employs a method called slurry seal to restore asphalt pavement with minor cracking.

Slurry seal involves applying a mixture of water, asphalt emulsion, aggregate, and additives to the existing pavement surface. This process creates a new protective layer that helps seal cracks and restore the road's durability, reducing the need for costly repairs in the future. Slurry seal is a cost-effective solution that extends the lifespan of the pavement, with a typical life expectancy of five to eight years.

Engineering staff used its Pavement Management System (PMS) to determine the list of neighborhood streets to be resurfaced. PMS is a planning tool that analyzes existing pavement conditions and identifies good, fair, and poor conditions. A vicinity map illustrating the various neighborhood streets scheduled this fiscal year for slurry seal is included as Attachment 1.

Page 76 ends

Page 2 ends

ANALYSIS:

The scope of work for the Project includes weed control, routing and crack sealing, application of slurry seal, protection of existing manholes and valves, thermoplastic restriping, and installation of pavement markings. The contract documents specify 40 working days for construction completion.

The Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and published in the Daily Bulletin Newspaper on March 18 and March 25, 2025. The City Clerk’s office facilitated the formal solicitation for bids. On April 1, 2025, the City Clerk’s office received four (4) construction bids. The Engineer’s estimate for the project was $460,000. The apparent lowest bidder, American Asphalt South, Inc., submitted a bid of $349,400. A full bid summary is provided in Attachment 2.

Engineering staff has reviewed all bids and found them to be complete and in compliance with the bid requirements, with any irregularities deemed inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background checks and confirmed that the lowest responsive bidder, American Asphalt South, Inc., meets all bid document requirements.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

Staff has determined that the Project is categorically Exempt under Section 15301, “Existing Facilities,” subsection (c), Class 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows:

A total of $4,655,000 has been budgeted in Fiscal Year 2024/25 from the Gas Tax R&T7360 (Fund 174) and Measure I (Fund 177) for the Local Street Paving Program. Of this amount, $448,372 will be allocated for this Project, with the remaining funds designated for other local street paving initiatives.

Funding for this Project is available under the Capital Improvement Project Account Number listed below:

Account No. Funding Source Description Amount
F177 CC303 SC 7004;
PID2195-177
Measure I Fund (177) Local Street Rehab $448,372
Expenditure Category Amount
Construction Contract $349,400
Construction Contract Contingency (10%) $34,940
Construction Inspection Services $42,120
Construction Inspection Contingency (10%) $4,215
Construction Materials Testing $16,075
Bid Noticing Advertisement $1,622
Estimated Construction Costs $ 448,372

Page 77 ends

Page 3 ends

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This project reflects the City Council's core values by enhancing community safety and well-being while driving continuous improvement through the development of high-quality public infrastructure.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Bid Summary

Page 78 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT# 800-2025-02
FY 2024/25 LOCAL SLURRY SEAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATIONS

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE
Project Site
Hermosa Avenue

Page 79 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
BID SUMMARY - BID DATE: April 01, 2025 APPARENT LOW BIDDER

AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH, DOUG MARTIN CONTRACTING
2 3 4
ROY ALLAN SLURRY SEAL, FY24-25 LOCAL SLURRY SEAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATIONS PROJECT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. INC. CO., INC. INC.

BASE BID
NO

UNIT BID
AMOUNT
21,000.00
387,500.00

UNIT BID UNIT
COST
2,980.00

2.18 27,225.00
5,500.00
BID
AMOUNT
2,980.00
UNIT
COST
5,000.00

1.93 29,000.00
41,700.00
BID
AMOUNT
5,000.00 $12,750.00
299,150.00 $2.09
UNIT
COST
BID
AMOUNT
12,750.00
323,950.00

QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST
21,000.00

2.50 COST
12,500.00

1.88 AMOUNT
12,500.00
291,400.00
1 2
1 LS Mobilization $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
155,000 SY Slurry Seal Type II, Emulsion Aggregate Slurry (EAS) 337,900.00 $ Removal of Existing Striping and Pavement markers and Installation of 3 4 1
1 LS
LS Traffic Control
$
$
30,500.00
21,000.00
$
$
30,500.00 $
$
30,500.00
15,000.00
$
$
30,500.00 $
$
$
$
27,225.00 $
$
$
$
29,000.00 $24,939.00 $
$
24,939.00 Thermoplastic striping and pavement marker
21,000.00 15,000.00 5,500.00 41,700.00 $17,250.00 17,250.00 TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT: $460,000.00 $349,400.00 $373,605.00 $374,850.00 $378,889.00

Page 80 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director Deborah Allen, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept All Improvements as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention for the RCMU Electric Vehicle Charging Station Hub. This Project is Exempt from All Appropriate National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review as Required by the Department of Energy and CEQA Guidelines. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:
1) Accept the RCMU Electric Vehicle Charging Station Hub, Contract No. 2019-085, Amendment 15 (Project), as complete;
2) Approve the final contract amount of $299,819; and
3) Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion for the Project.

BACKGROUND:

On October 15, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to Pacific Utility Installation (PUI) in the amount of $272,563 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $27,256 to address unforeseen construction-related incidentals. The scope of the work included installation of a transformer and switchgear, extending high-voltage conduit lines, connecting four highpowered ChargePoint electric vehicle charging stations with power modules and power banks, pouring concrete equipment pads, placing electrical cabling and substructure work, building an accessible ramp, replacing sidewalk sections, removing shrubs, installing 6’ bollards, and commissioning the new equipment.

The installation of Electric Vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure, located at 8309 Rochester Avenue, is vital to meet the demand and need for transportation electrification. This project helps reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, creating a reliable and accessible network of infrastructure that encourages the ownership or leasing of EVs in the Southern California region. Staff intends to offset the equipment costs with various funding sources, including the California Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Project (CALeVIP), the Department of Energy’s Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant Funding (EECBG) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Committee (MSRC).

Page 81 ends

Page 2 ends

Upon approval of project acceptance, the City Engineer will process approvals of all documents for recordation by the City Clerk.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

The Project included minor exterior modifications to extend high-voltage conduit runs to install a transformer, switchgear, and four (4) EV charging stations at an existing City facility parking lot. Staff determined that the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities).

Section 15301 exemption includes the “operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency’s determination.” Additionally, Staff determined that the Project is exempt from all appropriate National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) review as required by the Department of Energy as part of the EECBG funding award.

ANALYSIS:

The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The net increase in the total cost of the Project is covered by allotted contingency and is a result of one (1) Change Order, including the final balancing statement, which is summarized below:

Change Order No.1: Install additional conduit runs, repair high-voltage infrastructure damage, add wheel stops, and expand asphalt restoration. These tasks are within the contingency for the project. The change in the contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $27,256.

FISCAL IMPACT:

A total of $299,819 was budgeted in the adopted Fiscal Year 2024/25 Budget for the project construction, consisting of funds from Capital Projects-Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) to fund this Project. The total funds for this project were identified under Capital Improvement Account No. in the amounts listed below:

Account No. Funding Source Description Amount
F705 CC304 7000
SC7009; PID2095-705
Capital ProjectsMunicipal Utility
Fund (705) / Capital
Projects
RCMU Electric
Vehicle Charging
Station Hub
$299,819
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction and maintenance of high-quality public improvements that promote a world class community.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map

Page 82 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

RCMU ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATION HUB

AT RC SPORTS CENTER

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE
Project Site

Page 76 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Erika Lewis-Huntley, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1039, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Adding Chapter 10.84 to Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Regulating the Use of Bicycles and E-Conveyances in Public Areas. (ORDINANCE NO. 1039) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 1039 to be read by title only and waive further reading, adding Chapter 10.84 to Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Regulating the Use of Bicycles and E-Conveyances in Public Areas.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Rancho Cucamonga, like many cities throughout California and the country, has experienced a significant rise in the use of electric bicycles (e-bikes) and other electric conveyances (e-conveyances), such as electric scooters and skateboards, on city streets, sidewalks, and other public places. While these devices provide sustainable and accessible transportation alternatives, they have also led to an increase in safety concerns—particularly around their operation in public areas where they may conflict with vehicles and pedestrians.

In recent months, community members have increasingly expressed concern regarding unsafe behaviors associated with e-conveyance use. These behaviors include riding at excessive speeds, performing stunts or wheelies in active traffic, ignoring traffic signals and signs, riding without helmets, and carrying multiple riders on a single device. These actions increase the potential for collisions and injuries and have raised significant public safety concerns. National data reinforces these community concerns and local trends. According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), injuries associated with e-bikes, e-scooters, and similar devices have increased by more than 20% each year. From 2017 to 2022, the CPSC reported 233 related fatalities nationwide, underscoring the urgency for cities to adopt regulations that help mitigate risk and protect all users of public spaces. In addition to safety concerns, the City has observed damage to public property, particularly in parks and open spaces where e-conveyance users ride over grass, landscaped areas, and pedestrian paths. These activities not only pose risks to pedestrians but also increase maintenance costs and negatively impact the overall experience for other park users.

In response to these challenges, the City is exploring strategies to balance the benefits of econveyances with the need to ensure safety, accessibility, and the preservation of public property.

Page 84 ends

Page 2 ends

The proposed ordinance is a proactive step toward addressing these issues through clear regulations, which are part of the City’s comprehensive approach to enhancing safety and supporting the quality of life for all residents.

ANALYSIS:

In California, e-bikes are regulated under the California Vehicle Code (CVC) as conventional bicycles and must obey most all of the same regulations as non-motorized bicycles. E-bikes are defined by the CVC as bicycles with an electric motor of less than 750 watts and fully operable pedals. There are three classes of e-bikes codified in section 312.5 of the CVC:
• Class 1: Pedal-assist only, with motor assistance up to 20 mph • Class 2: Pedal-assist and includes a throttle, with motorized assistance up to 20 mph • Class 3: Pedal-assist only, with motor assistance up to 28 mph (all operators must be at least 16 years old, must wear a safety helmet, and must not transport passengers) It is important to distinguish these devices from electric “off-highway motorcycles,” which are becoming increasingly common. Despite their off-road-only classification, they are frequently mistaken for standard e-bikes, complicating enforcement and increasing risk. Electric off-highway motorcycles (e.g., Sur-ron, Talaria, E Ride Pro) are not classified as e-bikes because they do not have operable pedals and often exceed power limits outlined in the California Vehicle Code. As such, they are not street legal and may be subject to impoundment and citation if operated on any publicly-owned property, including but not limited to a public street, sidewalk, public right of way, park, bicycle path or trail, or any other public area open for vehicle or pedestrian travel. They are only permitted in areas designated for off-highway vehicle recreation or on private property with the owner's permission. These vehicles are not eligible for highway registration and cannot be modified for on-road use unless they were originally manufactured and certified for dual-purpose operation.

The California Vehicle Code provides express authority to cities to enact ordinances regulating time, place and manner of bicycles and e-conveyances for the purpose of assuring the safety of pedestrians, including persons with disabilities and others using sidewalks, bike paths, pathways, trails, bike lanes, streets, roads, and highways. The proposed ordinance includes the following key provisions designed to enhance public safety and address concerns related to the use of bicycles and e-conveyances on public property:
• Prohibits riding a bicycle or e-conveyance in an unsafe manner on any publicly-owned property.
• Defines “unsafe manner” to include violations of state or local traffic laws, as well as behaviors that endanger the operator, passenger, motorists, other riders, pedestrians, or public property. Examples of unsafe behavior includes as riding against traffic, disobeying signs, carrying passengers on single-rider devices, racing, performing stunts or wheelies, or operating without proper control.
• Prohibits the use of handheld wireless devices while riding unless operating hands-free and voice-activated devices.
• Restricts riding areas, including prohibiting use on sidewalks (with limited exceptions), parks (except on designated paths), landscaped areas, fields, and in City-owned parking lots.
• Clarifies rules for off-highway electric motorcycles (e.g., Sur-Ron, Talaria), which are not street legal and are prohibited on all public property unless in a designated off-highway vehicle area.

Page 85 ends

Page 3 ends

• Reinforces helmet requirements, including state-mandated helmet use for operators under 18 years old and all operators and passengers of Class 3 e-bikes, regardless of age. • Reaffirms requirements to always yield to pedestrians when emerging from an alley, driveway, bicycle path, building or otherwise approaching upon a sidewalk or sidewalk area.
• Requires riders to ride in single file, and not more than two abreast except on paths or parts of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles. • Requires all bicycles and e-conveyances to comply with equipment standards outlined in CVC Section 21201.
• Prohibits parking bicycles and e-conveyances in a manner that obstructs pedestrian pathways or violates posted parking regulations.
• Outlines enforcement protocols, including penalties and fines, and allows for the impoundment of devices operated by minors in a dangerous manner. • Holds parents or guardians accountable for violations committed by minors, including potential civil liability for property damage.

These provisions aim to promote responsible use, enhance public safety, reduce property damage, and preserve equitable access to public spaces for all community members.

The proposed ordinance is part of a broader, proactive strategy that includes infrastructure improvements to ensure all users can safely share public spaces. The City has made substantial and ongoing investments in its bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure to support safe riding and encourage active transportation. In recent years, the City has completed several key projects, including protected bike lanes, shared-use trails, and a cycle track to expand its network of safe paths for cyclists and pedestrians. The City’s long-range transportation plan, Connect RC, outlines more than 50 proposed bike and pedestrian infrastructure improvements throughout the city. This plan was developed with extensive community input and reflects the City’s commitment to improving safety and connectivity across the transportation network. Several of these improvements are already being implemented, with more to follow as funding is secured.

The City is also committed to education and outreach efforts. In 2024, the City received a $200,000 California Office of Traffic Safety grant to expand bike safety programming, including safety equipment giveaways and the development of Safe Routes to School mapping resources.

The City has also launched a range of citywide safety campaigns, including the "Look, Look, Look" campaign across digital billboards, social media, and print, to promote awareness among drivers and riders alike. Additionally, in partnership with the Rancho Cucamonga Police and Fire Departments, the City has produced safety videos and hosted bike rodeos for children and families in schools and neighborhoods. Further, the City’s Connect RC Bicycle Subcommittee actively organizes and participates in local bike rides, community outreach efforts, and citywide events to promote bicycle safety, increase ridership, and encourage public input on active transportation planning.

Overall, the proposed ordinance is part of a comprehensive strategy to promote the safe shared use of public areas. It is aligned with a broader vision that seeks not only to regulate and enforce, but also to educate and empower residents to travel safely. Enforcement will be paired with education and awareness campaigns to help both riders and drivers better understand the rules and responsibilities of operating bicycles and e-conveyances within the community. These combined efforts address safety concerns through effective regulation while fostering a safe and active transportation environment for all.

Page 86 ends

Page 4 ends

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact related to the adoption of this ordinance COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This ordinance helps realize the City Council’s core values of “Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all” and “Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all” by regulating the use of bicycles and e-conveyances to ensure community safety in public areas.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Ordinance No. 1039

Page 87 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 1 of 7
ORDINANCE NO. 1039

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.84 TO TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING THE USE OF BICYCLES AND ECONVEYANCES IN PUBLIC AREAS WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is committed to ensuring the public health, safety, and welfare of all its residents and visitors; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes the importance of fostering sustainable transportation options while maintaining public safety and accessibility for all users of public spaces; and WHEREAS, bicycles and e-conveyances (electric bicycles, scooters, and similar devices) have become increasingly popular modes of transportation and recreation within the City; and WHEREAS, the use of bicycles and e-conveyances in public spaces presents both benefits and challenges, including safety concerns for riders, pedestrians, and motorists; and WHEREAS, the City has observed a significant increase in traffic incidents involving econveyance users and motor vehicles with their increasing popularity, often due to higher speeds and unsafe riding practices; and
WHEREAS, the public has expressed concerns regarding the unsafe operation of econveyances, including reckless riding behaviors that pose risks to riders, pedestrians, drivers, and others in public spaces; and
WHEREAS, the City aims to promote the safe use of bicycles and e-conveyances by implementing regulations that align with state law and best practices in transportation safety; and WHEREAS, the City is committed to educating its residents and visitors on the safe operation of bicycles and e-conveyances to prevent accidents and other traffic hazards and promote responsible use of these transportation modes; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that providing clear guidelines for the operation of bicycles and e-conveyances in public spaces will improve the quality of life for all residents and visitors.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1: Chapter 10.84 is hereby added to Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows:

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 88 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 2 of 7
“Chapter 10.84 – REGULATING THE USE OF BICYCLES AND E-CONVEYANCES

10.84.010 – Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning set forth in this section:
“Bicycle” has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 231, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Bicycle Lane” has the same meaning as defined in Street and Highways Code Section 890.4, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Bicycle Path or Bicycle Trail” has the same meaning as defined in Street and Highways Code Section 890.4 and California Vehicle Code Section 231.5, as the provisions may be amended from time to time.
“E-Conveyance” means any electric bicycle or e-bike, electric scooter, electrically motorized skateboard, or other device that is designed to convey one or more people and is capable of being powered by human propulsion or electric motor propulsion. “Electric Bicycle” or “E-Bike” has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 312.5, as it may be amended from time to time, and which, as of the date of the adoption of this section, provides that an “electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor that does not exceed 750 watts, and are categorized under Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3.
“Electrically Motorized Skateboard” has the same meaning as defined in the California Vehicle Code Section 313.5, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Device” has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 313, as it may be amended from time to time. “Minor” means any person under the age of eighteen.
“Narrow Width Lane” means a lane that is too narrow for a bicycle and a vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.
“Off-Highway Motorcycle” has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 436, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Pedestrian” has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 467, as it may be amended from time to time.
"Public area" means any outdoor area, public alley, parkway, public transportation path, roadway,

Page 89 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 3 of 7
right-of-way, sidewalk, park, trail, paseo, pathway or street that is owned, granted by easement, operated or controlled by the City.
“Unsafe manner” is defined as an act in violation of the City Municipal Code, California Vehicle Code, or any other applicable state or federal law. For purposes of this section, operation of a bicycle or e-conveyance in an “unsafe manner” also includes operating in such a way that constitutes a danger to the operator, passenger, other motorist, other rider, pedestrian, or property.

“Vehicle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 670, as it may be amended from time to time.

10.84.020 Operation.

A. No person shall ride a bicycle or e-conveyance in an unsafe manner, as defined under Section 10.84.010, on any publicly owned property, including but not limited to a public street, sidewalk, public right of way, park, bicycle path, trail, or lane, or any other public area open for vehicle or pedestrian travel. Examples of riding in an unsafe manner include, but are not limited to, the following actions:

1. Riding on a public street or bikeway against the flow of traffic.

2. Not yielding to vehicles or pedestrians when required.

3. Operating an e-conveyance in a manner it was not designed for, including carrying passengers when not designed for carrying passengers.

4. Failing to obey posted traffic or other signs.

5. A person under the age of 18 riding without a properly fitted and fastened helmet.

6. Engaging in racing, speed, or stunt contests.

7. Carrying any package, bundle, item or article which prohibits the operator from having full control and forward visibility at all times.

8. Operating a bicycle or e-conveyance at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing taking into account the weather, pedestrian and vehicular traffic, and the surface and width of the sidewalk or roadway.

9. Performing any acrobatics, tricks, wheelies, or stunts when pedestrians or moving vehicles are present.

B. Any person operating a bicycle or e-conveyance upon a street at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at such a time shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway, except under any of the following situations:

1. When overtaking and passing another bicycle, e-conveyance, or vehicle proceeding in the same direction;

2. When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway;

3. When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions, including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, other e-conveyances, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface

Page 90 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 4 of 7
hazards, or narrow width lanes, that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge; or

4. When operating as close as practicable to the left-hand curb or edge of the roadway on a one-way street.

C. Persons riding or operating bicycles or electric bicycles shall not ride more than two abreast, except on paths or parts of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.

D. Any person operating a bicycle or e-conveyance who is emerging from an alley, driveway, bicycle path, building or otherwise approaching upon a sidewalk or sidewalk area, shall yield the right-of-way to all pedestrians on such sidewalk or sidewalk area, and upon entering a bicycle lane, highway, or street shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles, bicycles, or e-conveyances on the roadway.

E. No person shall operate a bicycle or e-conveyance in any City park, except on paved paths or trails that are specifically designated for bicycle or e-conveyance use. The operation of bicycles or e-conveyances is strictly prohibited on dirt, grass, athletic fields, landscaped areas, or any other non-designated surfaces within any City park.

F. No person shall operate a bicycle or e-conveyance in any parking lot of any property owned or operated by the City. Within such parking lots, bicycles or e-conveyances must be walked, not ridden.

G. No person shall operate a bicycle or e-conveyance while holding and operating a handheld wireless telephone or an electronic wireless communications device unless the wireless telephone or electronic wireless communications device is specifically designed and configured to allow voice-operated and hands-free operation, and it is used in that manner while riding.

H. No person shall operate a bicycle or electric bicycle on any sidewalk, except:

1. A person may ride a bicycle or electric bicycle on any area designated as a driveway;

2. Any area designated as a bikeway by the City Council; or

3. To avoid a dangerous situation on the road or an obstacle.

10.84.030 Electric Off-Highway Motorcycles.

A. No person shall operate an electric off-highway motorcycle of any model (e.g., Sur-Ron, Talaria, E Ride Pro) on any publicly-owned property, including but not limited to, a public street, sidewalk, public right of way, park, bicycle path or trail, or any other public area open for vehicle or pedestrian travel.

B. Electric off-highway motorcycles are only allowed to be operated in areas specifically designated for off-highway vehicle recreation, or on private property with the express permission of the property owner. Unlike electric bicycles or mopeds, such vehicles are not eligible for highway

Page 91 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 5 of 7
registration and cannot be retrofitted for on-road use unless originally manufactured and certified for dual-purpose operation.

10.84.040 Equipment.

A. Every bicycle, including electric bicycles, when operated within the City, shall comply with all of the equipment requirements contained in California Vehicle Code Section 21201.

B. Any minor operating or riding as a passenger upon a bicycle or e-conveyance in a public area or any other place open to the public for vehicle and pedestrian travel must wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet.

C. Any operator or passenger of a Class 3 electric bicycle, regardless of age, must wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21213.

10.84.050 Parking.

No person shall temporarily leave unaccompanied, abandon, or park a bicycle or e-conveyance in a manner that obstructs vehicular traffic, the pedestrian travel way of any sidewalk or pedestrian path, or on public property in violation of any government sign prohibiting parking of bicycles or econveyances at a location.

10.84.060 Enforcement.

A. Any person, including a minor, who violates the provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to penalties, fines, and enforcement procedures set forth in Chapter 1.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.

B. Violations by Minors

1. The parent of any child, and the guardian of any ward, shall not authorize or knowingly permit any minor child or ward to violate any of the provisions of this Chapter.

2. In the case of a minor committing a violation under this Chapter, the parent or guardian may be held responsible for the violation and any associated penalties or fines.

3. If the minor’s activities result in damage to public property, the City may, pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1714.1, pursue a civil complaint against the minor’s parent(s) or guardian(s) having custody and control of the minor for every tort resulting in property damage.

C. Impoundment

1. In addition to all other available penalties, the Enforcement Officer shall have the authority to take immediate possession of and transport a bicycle or e-conveyance for safekeeping to the nearest City facility if an unaccompanied minor is found in violation of any provisions of this Chapter, and the unsafe manner in which the device was operated constitutes an immediate danger

Page 92 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 6 of 7
to the health and safety of the juvenile operator or to members of the public, thus constituting an exigent circumstance.

2. The impounded device shall be released by the City to the parent or legal guardian of the minor if the individual owns the device.

3. Upon impoundment of any e-conveyance device under this Chapter, the minor shall be issued a receipt. Said receipt shall state the days, business hours, location, and process by which the owner may claim the impounded device within 30 days. The citation receipt shall also explain that unclaimed devices impounded for longer than 30 days will be disposed subject to an opportunity for a pre-disposal hearing or sold at an auction in accordance with laws governing the disposal of abandoned property.

10.84.070 Exemptions.

A. First responders, as defined under California Government Code Section 8562, are exempt from this Chapter while in the performance of their duties.

B. This Chapter is not intended to apply to or otherwise restrict electric personal assistive mobility devices used in a safe manner by physically disabled persons as defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq.) and section 36.311 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations.”
SECTION 2: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.

SECTION 3: CEQA. The City Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because there is no potential that the regulations for bicycles and econveyances will result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. In addition, this Ordinance is not subject to CEQA under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) because the Ordinance is an activity that is not a project as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.

SECTION 4: Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.

Page 93 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 7 of 7
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 2025.

_____________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of April 2025, and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 7th day of May, 2025.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Executed this 8th day of May 2025, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ____________________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk

Page 94 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 1 of 7
ORDINANCE NO. 1039

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1: Chapter 10.84 is hereby added to Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows:

ATTACHMENT 1
2025-04-16 – REGULAR MEETING – ITEM F1 – ADDITIONAL MATERIAL

Page 95 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 2 of 7
“Chapter 10.84 – REGULATING THE USE OF BICYCLES AND E-CONVEYANCES

10.84.010 – Definitions.

Page 96 ends

“Vehicle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 670, as it may be amended from time to time.

10.84.020 Operation.

1. Riding on a public street or bikeway against the flow of traffic.

2. Not yielding to vehicles or pedestrians when required.

3. Operating an e-conveyance in a manner it was not designed for, including carrying passengers when not designed for carrying passengers.

4. Failing to obey posted traffic or other signs.

5. A person under the age of 18 riding without a properly fitted and fastened helmet.

6. Engaging in racing, speed, or stunt contests.

7. Carrying any package, bundle, item or article which prohibits the operator from having full control and forward visibility at all times.

9. Performing any acrobatics, tricks, wheelies, or stunts when pedestrians or moving vehicles are present.

1. When overtaking and passing another bicycle, e-conveyance, or vehicle proceeding in the same direction;

2. When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway;

3. When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions, including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, other e-conveyances, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface

Page 97 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 4 of 7
hazards, or narrow width lanes, that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge; or

4. When operating as close as practicable to the left-hand curb or edge of the roadway on a one-way street.

C. Persons riding or operating bicycles or electric bicycles shall not ride more than two abreast, except on paths or parts of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.

F. No person shall operate a bicycle or e-conveyance in any parking lot of any property owned or operated by the City. Within such parking lots, bicycles or e-conveyances must be walked, not ridden.

H. No person shall operate a bicycle or electric bicycle on any sidewalk, except:

1. A person may ride a bicycle or electric bicycle on any area designated as a driveway;

2. Any area designated as a bikeway by the City Council; or

3. To avoid a dangerous situation on the road or an obstacle.

10.84.030 Electric Off-Highway Motorcycles.

Page 98 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 5 of 7
registration and cannot be retrofitted for on-road use unless originally manufactured and certified for dual-purpose operation.

10.84.040 Equipment.

A. Every bicycle, including electric bicycles, when operated within the City, shall comply with all of the equipment requirements contained in California Vehicle Code Section 21201.

C. Any operator or passenger of a Class 3 electric bicycle, regardless of age, must wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21213.

10.84.050 Parking.

10.84.060 Enforcement.

B. Violations by Minors

1. The parent of any child, and the guardian of any ward, shall not authorize or knowingly permit any minor child or ward to violate any of the provisions of this Chapter.

2. In the case of a minor committing a violation under this Chapter, the parent or guardian may be held responsible for the violation and any associated penalties or fines.

C. Impoundment

Page 99 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 6 of 7
to the health and safety of the juvenile operator or to members of the public, thus constituting an exigent circumstance.

2. The impounded device shall be released by the City to the parent or legal guardian of the minor if the individual owns the device.

10.84.070 Exemptions.

A. First responders, as defined under California Government Code Section 8562, are exempt from this Chapter while in the performance of their duties.

SECTION 4: Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.

Page 100 ends

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 7 of 7
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7
th day of May, 2025.

_____________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Executed this 8
th day of May 2025, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
____________________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk

Page 101 ends

DATE: April 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager
Zack Neighbors, Director of Building and Safety Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-010, A Resolution of the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study for the Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee, Library Impact Fee, Animal Center Impact Fee, Police Impact Fee, Park Impact Fees and Fire Impact Fee , Adopting Capital Improvement Programs as Part of the Nexus Study, Updating and Establishing the Fee Amounts for Such Development Impact Fees, and Making a Determination of Exemption Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1038, to Be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, An Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Adding Chapter 3.80 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Establishing a Development Impact Fee for Fire Impacts of Residential and Business Development, Amending Chapter 3.68 to Remove References to Quimby Act in Lieu Fees, and Making a Determination of Exemption from the CEQA. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-010) (ORDINANCE NO. 1038) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Reopen the noticed public hearing to receive comments and testimony from the public on the proposed impact fees and nexus study for the Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee, Library Impact Fee, Animal Center Impact Fee, Police Impact Fee, Park Impact Fees and Fire Impact Fee;

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-010 adopting the nexus study for the Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee, Library Impact Fee, Animal Center Impact Fee, Police Impact Fee, Park Impact Fees and Fire Impact Fee, adopting capital improvement programs as part of the nexus study, and approving the updated Development Impact Fee amounts, including findings in support thereof; and

3. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No.1038, Adding Chapter 3.80 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Establishing a Development Impact Fee for Fire Impacts of Residential and Business Development, Amending Chapter 3.68 to Remove References

Page 102 ends

Page 2 ends

to Quimby Act in Lieu Fees, and Making a Determination of Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act
BACKGROUND:

Impact fees are charges that local governments impose on developers to offset the impacts and cost of new development on public services and infrastructure, such as roads, schools, parks, and emergency services. These fees aim to ensure that growth supports itself financially, rather than placing a burden on existing residents and taxpayers. In recent years, California has faced a housing shortage, driven by high demand and limited supply. To address this crisis, the state has sought to regulate the fees associated with development, ensuring that they are applied in a way that supports housing development and balances infrastructure needs.

One key regulation addressing development fees is the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000-66025), which governs how local governments can charge developers impact or mitigation fees to address the effects of new developments on public infrastructure and services.

The Mitigation Fee Act has recently been updated with Assembly Bill 602 (AB 602), which in part addresses the application of impact fees on housing development projects.

The most recent update to the City’s Development Impact Fees (DIFs) was adopted by Council on December 2, 2020. Construction costs have experienced significant increases from December 2020 to the present, driven by several factors including supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, inflation, and rising prices for materials, among other things. Construction inflation has typically outpaced general inflation, with industry-specific inflation in the construction sector often reaching 5 -10% annually. The rising cost of inflation has significant implications for the City's ability to fund and expand the public infrastructure and facilities required to support growth driven by new development. In order to ensure that the DIFs continue to reflect current costs, are properly apportioned, and meet current legal requirements, to ensure the City can effectively meet the demands of future growth.

This staff report provides an overview of the legal and procedural background for the establishment and implementation of Development Impact Fees, specifically in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act as amended. It outlines the required procedures, methodology, and guidelines for adopting impact fees to mitigate the effects of new development on public infrastructure and services. The goal is to ensure that new development pays its fair share of the costs for public facilities and services that are necessitated by the development, without placing an undue burden on existing residents or taxpayers.

DIFs are charges levied on new development projects to fund the construction or expansion of public infrastructure and facilities needed to support the growth generated by the development.

Included in the current DIFs are Park Impact Fees, Community and Recreation Impact Fees, Library Impact Fees, Animal Center Impact Fees, and Police Impact Fees which ensures that new development and redevelopment projects will pay their “fair share” towards new and expanded infrastructure and facilities that mitigate the impacts caused by this growth. Further, given the impact of new development on fire and emergency response facilities, a Fire Impact Fee has been developed for consideration by the City Council. The City also has a Transportation Impact Fee, which will be considered by the City Council at its May 7th meeting.

Page 103 ends

Page 3 ends

Mitigation Fee Act: The Mitigation Fee Act provides the legal framework for the imposition of development fees in California. It requires that fees imposed on new development must be reasonably related to the impact caused by the development. AB 602 modified the Mitigation Fee Act to enhance transparency and accountability in the process of collecting and expending development impact fees. The Mitigation Fee Act requires that agencies provide clear and detailed accounting of fees collected and ensure the use of funds aligns with the purpose for which they were intended.

The Mitigation Fee Act sets forth the following key provisions regarding the establishment and collection of development impact fees:
• Nexus Requirement: The imposition of development impact fees must demonstrate a clear nexus between the proposed fee and the public infrastructure, or services needed to support the development. In other words, there must be a reasonable connection between the fee charged and the impacts of the new development on public facilities. • Proportionality: The fees must be proportional to the impact caused by the development.

This means the fee cannot exceed the fair share of the cost of providing necessary infrastructure or services that the development necessitates. • Fee Transparency: The public must be notified of any proposed fees, and a detailed report on the fees must be provided that explains the methodology used to calculate the fees, including the specific improvements that the fees are intended to fund. • Accountability: Fees collected must be used solely for the purpose for which they were collected and must be expended in a timely manner. After certain periods of time, unspent fees may need be returned to the developers or held in a separate interest-bearing account.

The Mitigation Fee Act also requires agencies to follow other requirements including:
• Annual Reporting: Local agencies that collect development impact fees are required to provide an annual report to the public detailing the amounts of fees collected, how the fees have been spent, and the status of any projects funded by the fees. • Five-Year Accounting Requirement: Every five years, the City must make certain findings regarding the fees, including the expected dates when the funds will be spent, and progress made on constructing the funded infrastructure. This requirement aims to ensure that collected fees are used in a timely manner to address the impacts of development.
• Fee Transparency: Agencies must now provide a clear, itemized accounting of the fee amounts collected and the projects funded, making the process more transparent for developers, the public, and other stakeholders. An annual report is required to show the fees collected, how the fees have been spent, and the progress of the related capital projects.

The process for establishing DIFs involves several steps, including data collection, analysis, and stakeholder engagement. A typical methodology for setting up development impact fees includes the following steps:
• Assess the Impact: Analyze the types and scale of infrastructure and services needed to serve new development, based on projected growth and land use patterns. • Consult with Relevant Departments: Coordinate with public agencies, including transportation, parks, water, and education departments, to assess facility and service

Page 104 ends

Page 4 ends

needs.
• Nexus Analysis: A Nexus Study is typically required to determine the appropriate amount of the impact fee. The study should demonstrate a clear connection between the new development and the infrastructure, or services required to support it. • Proportionality: The study should also demonstrate that the fees are proportional to the level of service that the new development will require. • Fee Calculation: The fee level is determined based on the estimated cost of infrastructure improvements and the number of new residents or employees that will be generated by the development. Various methodologies can be used, such as:
o Level of Services Method: Charges developers for the actual costs of providing facilities or services.
o Plan-based Method: Calculates fees based on an adopted capital improvement plan or facility master plan.
o System-based Method: Calculates the fees associated with the Fire Development Impact Fee.
• Public Review: The public must be given an opportunity to review the proposed fees.

This includes a public hearing where stakeholders can provide input. • Adoption of Fees: After the public hearing, the governing body (e.g., City Council) may adopt the fees.

In order to ensure that newly established or updated fees are in alignment with the Mitigation Fee Act, the City contracted with NBS, a consulting firm with extensive experience in the preparation of nexus studies, to prepare the attached nexus study.

On April 2, 2025, the City Council opened the duly noticed public hearing regarding the proposed non-transportation impact fees, as well as the proposed transportation impact fee. The City Council continued the public hearing as the non-transportation impact fees described herein to the April 16, 2025, City Council meeting and continued the public hearing as to the transportation impact fees to the May 7, 2025, meeting.

ANALYSIS:

The DIF Program is designed around key projects and improvements outlined in the City’s General Plan. With the enactment of new State laws and updates to existing regulations, the General Plan has undergone revisions to align with these changes. Notably, these updates include provisions to accommodate more than 10,000 new residential units mandated by the State of California and implement new infrastructure to accommodate new development. These revisions directly affect the City’s DIFs.

As a result of these updates, the City’s approach to levying fees has evolved, particularly in response to the new requirements of AB 602, which became effective on January 1, 2022. This legislation mandates that impact fees levied on residential development be calculated based on square footage for future units rather than the prior standard of per dwelling unit. A nexus study must evaluate how existing and future residential development can be estimated by square footage or provide justification for why square footage is not relevant in this context, if it does not appropriately reflect the relationship between the fee, facility demand, and residential land use.

Additionally, AB 602 requires that, effective July 1, 2022, large jurisdictions adopting a nexus study must also adopt a capital improvement plan as part of the study. To comply with this

Page 105 ends

Page 5 ends

requirement, the City has prepared an amendment to the Capital Improvement Plan, which is integrated into the Major Projects Program. This amendment has been included in the attached resolution for consideration as part of the process to establish fees under the DIF Program.

To comply with the requirements of AB 602 the Non-Transportation Nexus Study utilized an existing level of service approach while calculating the Park Impact Fees. Chapter 3.68 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code established and governs impact fees for park land acquisition and park improvements. The City follows the General Plan standard for parkland and as a result the City does not use the Quimby Act.

In 2021, Section 66016.5 was added to the Mitigation Fee by Act AB 602. Paragraph (a)(2) of that section requires that, after January 1, 2022, the level of service used to calculate impact fees in a nexus study must be compared with the existing level of service, and if the proposed new level of service is higher than the existing level of service, an explanation must be included Because the level of service used to calculate impact fees in this chapter is the same as the existing level of service, no explanation is required to satisfy the requirements of Section 66016.5(a)(2).

Park Land Acquisition Impact Fee and the Park Improvement Impact Fee The following tables reflect the City’s existing park acreage, existing level of service for park land and improve land, the cost per capita of existing park maintenance equipment, cost per capita for park land acquisition and improvements all of which are incorporated into the calculation which creates the Park Land Acquisition Impact Fee per Square Foot and the Park Improvement Impact Fee per Square Foot.

Page 106 ends

Page 6 ends

Page 107 ends

Page 7 ends

Existing Level of Service
Table 3.2 calculates existing levels of service in terms of acres per capita and acres per 1,000 population for total City-owned Park land and for improved park land.

Table 3.3 calculates the costs per capita for park maintenance vehicles and equipment based on the replacement cost of existing park maintenance vehicles and equipment divided by the existing population of the City. That cost per capita is added to the cost per capita for park improvements in Table 3.6 where the per-capita costs are converted into a cost per unit of development.

Cost Per Capita
Table 3.4 calculates the cost per capita for park land acquisition and for park improvements using the existing level of service in acres per capita and the cost-per-acre estimates for park land acquisition and park improvements.

Page 108 ends

Page 8 ends

Impact Fees per Square Foot
Table 3.5 shows the calculation of park land acquisition impact fees per square foot for singlefamily and multi-family residential development. It should be noted that this fee was reduced from the prior version of the nexus study issued for public comment. The lower impact fee reflects a “credit” against existing unimproved land owned by the City and planned for park uses within the City.

Page 109 ends

Page 9 ends

Table 3.6 shows the calculation of impact fees per square foot for single-family and multi-family residential development for park improvements.

Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee
To comply with Section 66016.5 of the Mitigation Fee Act, the level of service used to calculate impact fees in a nexus study must be compared with the existing level of service, and if the proposed new level of service is higher than the existing level of service, an explanation must be included. Because the level of service used to calculate impact fees in this chapter is the same as the existing level of service, no explanation is required to satisfy the requirements of Section 66016.5(a)(2). This existing level of service approach was utilized in the calculation for the Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee.

Existing Facilities
Table 4.1 lists the City’s existing community and recreation centers with their estimated replacement cost. Replacement cost is used in this analysis as an indicator of the cost of

Page 110 ends

Page 10 ends

constructing additional facilities to serve future development.

Cost per Capita
Table 4.2 calculates the replacement cost per capita for community and recreation center facilities using the impact fee cost basis from Table 4.1 and the existing population.

In the next section, the cost per capita from Table 4.2 is used to calculate community and recreation center impact fees per unit, which are then divided by square-feet-per-unit factors to get impact fees per square foot for single-family and multi-family residential development.

Impact Fees per Square Foot
Table 4.3 shows the calculation of community and recreation center impact fees per square foot for single-family and multi-family residential development.

Page 111 ends

Page 11 ends

Library Impact Fee
To comply with Section 66016.5 of the Mitigation Fee Act the level of service used to calculate impact fees in a nexus study must be compared with the existing level of service, and if the proposed new level of service is higher than the existing level of service, an explanation must be included. Because the level of service used to calculate impact fees in this chapter is the same as the existing level of service, no explanation is required to satisfy the requirements of Section 66016.5(a)(2). This existing level of service approach was utilized in the calculation for the Library Impact Fee.

Existing Facilities
Table 5.1 lists the City’s existing libraries with their estimated replacement cost. Replacement cost is used in this analysis as an indicator of the cost of constructing additional facilities to serve future development. Cost for library furniture fixtures and equipment, and the contents of the museum at the Biane Library are listed separately.

Page 112 ends

Page 12 ends

This analysis also includes the cost of library materials (books and electronic media). Table 5.2 shows the estimated replacement cost of the library system’s existing materials.

Cost per Capita
Table 5.3 calculates the replacement cost per capita for library facilities and materials using the impact fee cost basis for library facilities from Table 5.1, and the impact fee cost basis for existing library materials from Table 5.2, both divided by the City’s existing population.

In the next section, the total cost per capita from Table 5.3 is used to calculate library impact fees per unit, which are then divided by square feet per unit factors to get impact fees per square foot for single-family and multi-family residential development.

Impact Fees per Square Foot
Table 5.4 shows the calculation of library impact fees per square foot for single-family and multifamily residential development.

Page 113 ends

Page 13 ends

Animal Center Impact Fee
The City has not adopted a formal level of service standard for animal center facilities.

Consequently, the level-of-service standard used to calculate impact fees is the existing relationship between the City’s population and the replacement cost of existing animal center facilities, vehicles and equipment, stated as a cost per capita.

To comply with Section 66016.5 of the Mitigation Fee Act the level of service used to calculate impact fees in a nexus study must be compared with the existing level of service, and if the proposed new level of service is higher than the existing level of service, an explanation must be included. Because the level of service used to calculate impact fees in this chapter is the same as the existing level of service, no explanation is required to satisfy the requirements of Section 66016.5(a)(2). This existing level of service approach was utilized in the calculation for the Animal Center Impact Fee.

Existing Facilities
Table 6.1 shows the estimated replacement cost for the City’s existing Animal Center and the value of a 1.92-acre site the City has acquired to expand that facility. Table 6.1 also shows a credit for the current balance in the City’s Animal Center impact fee fund which is available to increase the existing level of service.

Page 114 ends

Page 14 ends

Table 6.2 lists the Animal Services Department’s existing vehicles and equipment with replacement costs.

Page 115 ends

Page 15 ends

Cost per Capita
Table 6.3 calculates the cost per capita for Animal Center facilities, vehicles and equipment using the impact fee cost basis from Tables 6.1 and 6.2 and the City’s existing residential population In the next section, the total cost per capita from Table 6.3 is used to calculate animal center impact fees per unit, which are then divided by square feet per unit factors to get impact fees per square foot for single-family and multi-family residential development.

Impact Fees per Square Foot
Table 6.4 shows the calculation of animal center impact fees per square foot for single-family and multi-family residential development.

Police Impact Fee
The Police Impact Fee is calculated for police facilities needed to serve future development in the City. Chapter 3.64 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishes and governs the police impact fee. The City’s primary police facility is the Public Safety Building at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center. The other existing City-owned police facility is a satellite police station co-located with Fire Station 172 on San Bernardino Road in the western portion of the City. The

Page 116 ends

Page 16 ends

department also has a substation in a leased space in the Victoria Gardens shopping mall and is planning to construct a permanent substation in that area in the future.

Existing Facilities
Table 7.1 lists the City’s existing police facilities with their estimated replacement cost.

Replacement cost is used in this analysis as an indicator of the cost of constructing additional facilities to serve future development.

Cost per Call for Service
Table 7.2 calculates the facility cost per call for service for police facilities using the impact fee cost basis from Table 7.1 and the number of existing calls for service.

Page 117 ends

Page 17 ends

In the next section, the cost per call from Table 7.2 is multiplied by calls per unit factors to calculate police impact fees per unit for each type of development defined in this study The residential impact fees per unit are then divided by square feet-per-unit factors to get impact fees per square foot for residential.

The cost per call from Table 7.2 can also be used to customize impact fees for any non-residential project that does not reasonably fit within one of the development types identified in this report.

Such a customized fee would be based on the estimated number of police calls per year for the project, multiplied by the cost per call from Table 7.2. The number of police calls per year for a specific type of development project can be estimated by reviewing call records for similar existing projects in the City.

Impact Fees per Square Foot (Residential) and per Unit (Non-Residential) Table 7.3 shows the calculation of police impact fees per square foot for residential development and per unit for non-residential development.

Page 118 ends

Page 18 ends

Fire Impact Fee
Rancho Cucamonga does not have an existing fire impact fee. This section calculates impact fees for fire protection and emergency response facilities, apparatus and equipment provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD or District) to all development in the City.

The boundary of RCFPD encompasses the entire City as well as a small area to the north of the City that is planned to remain within the unincorporated territory of San Bernardino County.

Fire districts lack authority to impose impact fees on their own. Impact fees calculated in this section will be adopted and imposed by the City and revenue from the impact fees will be used to support RCFPD to pay for additional capital facilities and other capital assets serving new development in the City. These impact fees will apply only to the portion of RCFPD that is within the City.

Level of Service
The most important single factor in defining level of service for fire protection and emergency medical services agencies is response time to emergency calls. The 2024 Comprehensive Master Plan for RCFPD states that RCFPD’s first due unit currently arrives within 9 minutes and 45 seconds, 90% of the time. The Master Plan makes recommendations to improve total response time, including reducing call processing time. The addition of one fire station will help RCFPD maintain and possibly improve its response time performance as future development occurs.

Facilities, Apparatus and Equipment
At present, RCFPD operates eight fire stations as well as an administrative facility, an all-risk training center (ARTC) and a shop facility. RCFPD is planning to construct one additional fire station and has acquired property on 8th Street as a site for that station.

Table 8.1 lists RCFPD’s existing and planned fire stations as well as the administrative and training center buildings and the shop facility. Stations 171 through 178 currently exist. Station 179 is planned for future construction.

Page 119 ends

Page 19 ends

The impact fee cost basis in the right-hand column of Table 8.1 includes the depreciated replacement cost for existing buildings plus the estimated site value for each building. Where multiple buildings are located on one site, the land cost is shown for the first building. For future Station 179, the cost shown is estimated based on recent construction costs.

Table 8.2 lists RCFPD’s existing firefighting apparatus and other vehicles and equipment. Costs for all vehicles and equipment shown in the far-right column of Table 8.2 are depreciated replacement costs based on the useful life shown in that table. Vehicles and equipment are assumed to have a residual value of at least 15% of replacement cost, regardless of age. Assets with a value of less than $10,000 have been omitted from Table 8.2.

Page 120 ends

Page 20 ends

Page 121 ends

Page 21 ends

Table 8.3 shows the cost of future apparatus and equipment needed to serve the City in 2040, including one Type I engine that will be needed for future Fire Station 179. The estimated cost of that engine is based on the current cost of similar equipment. Also shown in that table is the cost of personal protective equipment for nine firefighters that will be needed to staff Station 179.

Table 8.4 summarizes the costs from the preceding three tables.

Cost per Call for Service
Table 8.5 calculates the cost per call for service for RCFPD facilities, apparatus and equipment using the total impact fee cost basis from Table 8.4 and the projected number of calls for service per year in 2040. In Table 8.5, the combined cost of existing and planned facilities, apparatus, vehicles and equipment is divided by total 2040 calls to both existing and future development served by RCFPD.

Page 122 ends

Page 22 ends

The number of calls for service per year shown for 2040 includes calls in the area served by RCFPD outside of the City, so that the cost of serving development in that area is not included in the cost per call for impact fees charged by the City. The impact fees calculated in this section are designed to recover new development’s proportionate share of the cost of all RCFPD’s existing and planned facilities, apparatus and equipment our to 2040. In the next section, the cost per call is multiplied by calls per unit factors to calculate impact fees per unit. Then for residential development, the impact fee per unit is divided by square feet per unit factors to get impact fees per square foot for single-family and multi-family residential development.

The cost per call for service per year in Table 8.5 can also be used to calculate customized impact fees for development of non-residential development projects that do not fit within the categories of development defined in this study. Customized impact fees can be calculated using the cost per call for service per year from Table 8.5 multiplied by the estimated number of calls per year that will be generated by a specific project.

Impact Fees per Square Foot (Residential) and per Unit (Non-Residential) Table 8.6 shows the calculation of fire impact fees per square foot for residential development and per unit for non-residential development.

Page 123 ends

Page 23 ends

Fee Adjustment to Avoid Overcollection
The fees shown in Table 8.6 project revenue that exceeds the estimated cost of future assets shown in Table 8.4 by around 3%. To avoid the potential for overcollection, the impact fees from Table 8.6 are reduced by 3.1% in Table 8.7.

Page 124 ends

Page 24 ends

In order to be in alignment with the requirements of AB 602, the Non-Transportation Nexus Study changed its method of fee levy from the DU (dwelling unit) approach to a square foot approach.

The change is illustrated in Tables S.1 and S.3 of the NBS Non-Transportation Nexus Study below:

Page 125 ends

Page 25 ends

Administrative Fee:

The City is required to implement the fee program according to various administrative, accounting, reporting, and public notice responsibilities that are specified in the Government Code. These responsibilities require the expenditure of staff time and often include retaining outside advisory services. The City proposes to include a fee to allow for reasonable cost recovery for these administrative costs and proposes a fee of two and one-half percent (2.5%) which is in line with representative implementation costs including as specified in the “Nexus Study and Residential Feasibility Calculation Templates in fulfillment of AB 602” prepared by the Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley for the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

Communication:

The City met the requirements of Government Code Section 66016.5(a)(7) by publishing and sending notice to interested parties 30 days prior to the adoption of the impact fee nexus (30 days prior to the advertised hearing). The City published and sent notice thirty- four (34) days prior to the advertised hearing. The City also made a copy of the Nexus Studies available on the City’s website and a hard copy available at the City Clerk’s office thirty-four (34) days prior to the advertised public hearing. The Public Hearing Notice was advertised twice ten (10) days in advance and at least five (5) days between those dates in the local newspaper. The City met with BIA (Building Industry Association) and other interested parties twice before the previous advertised hearing once in November of 2024 and once in December of 2024 and has had conversations with BIA and interested parties prior to the advertised public hearing date for April 2, 2025. The City has received letters with questions and comments from DVBA (Desert Valley Builders Association), BIA, DPFG (Development Planning & Finance Group) and LLG (Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers) and have provided responses to the questions and comments which have been attached to the Staff Report as Attachment 8. In added, the City Council continued the public hearing initially scheduled for April 2, 2025, to April 16, 2025 for the NonTransportation Nexus Study and May 7, 2025, for the Transportation Nexus Study, in order to provide for further communication with interested stakeholders on the fees.

Implementation
During last minute discussions with the Building Industry Association (BIA) concerns were expressed about the prepayment of development impact fees prior to increases taking effect, as well as ensuring a level of certainty for projects with already completed applications. Existing state law, known as SB 330, already provides a process for housing developers to freeze fees at the time of application submittal. The City follows existing state law in this regard with no local changes or additions. The City is also proposing that if approved by the City Council, the proposed Development Impact Fee changes outlined in this report would take effect on July 1, 2025, which is more time than would otherwise be required under the Mitigation Fee Act. In practical experience, however, the City has found the fee changes which take effect at the start of a new fiscal year are often easier to notice, apply and update systems.

The BIA expressed concerns that existing deemed complete applications in process, should be allowed several years to finish entitlement and move to permits, during which their fees would be grandfathered. The City, however, did not calculate this type of extended multiple year freeze into the Nexus Study and has significant concerns that this could undermine the validity of the Nexus Study calculations. A second issue the BIA expressed concern about was the deadline

Page 126 ends

Page 26 ends

for deemed complete applications as the BIA was requesting a deadline 30 days after the ordinance takes effect. The City has similar concerns with a rush of applications intended to beat the deadline that could result in thousands of units coming in under the old fees, also undermining the validity of the Nexus Study calculations. In response to the BIA concerns, the City is recommending the following:
- Developers with applications submitted prior to close of business on April 16, 2025, and are subsequently deemed complete, may elect to proceed forward under the new or old Development Impact Fee Program.
▪ Proceeding forward under the old development impact fee program will be permitted so long as entitlements are received and building permits are pulled prior to July 1, 2026.
▪ Proceeding forward under the new development impact fee program, and the payment of fees at the initial rates, prior to issuance of a building permit, will require completion of plans to the point of knowing actual square footages. Otherwise, the option always exists to pay the fees in effect at time of permit issuance or time of certificate of occupancy, however long that might take.
- The City finds the adjustments noted above should not create a significant deviation in the nexus study such that further adjustments would be needed.

An updated draft resolution will be included and available at the City Council meeting on April 16, 2025.

Actions to Update the DIFs:

To implement the updated DIF program as proposed, the City Council must:
1) Adopt the Nexus Studies
2) Adopt the CIP
3) Establish the DIF fee amounts
4) Add Chapter 3.80 to the Code to add the Fire Impact Fee 5) Amend Chapter 3.68 of the code to update the Park Impact Fees Items 1, 2, and 3 above are included in Resolution No. 2025-010, which is included as attachment

4. Items 4 and 5 above are included in Ordinance No.1038, which is included as attachment 1.

Staff therefore recommends that the City Council: (1) Adopt A Resolution of the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving Development Impact Fee Nexus Studies, Adopting Capital Improvement Programs as Part of the Nexus Studies, Updating and Establishing the Fee Amounts for the City’s Development Impact Fees, and Making a Determination of Exemption Under CEQA and (2) Introduce Ordinance No.1038, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, An Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Adding Chapter 3.80 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Establishing a Development Impact Fee for Fire Impacts of Residential and Business Development, Amending Chapter 3.68 to Remove References to

Page 127 ends

Page 27 ends

Quimby Act in Lieu Fees, and Making a Determination of Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The Project (approval of the Nexus Studies, Capital Improvement Plans associated with the Nexus Studies, and the adoption of the development impact fees specified in the Resolution and Ordinance), was reviewed in accordance with the criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the State CEQA Guidelines. Approval of the Nexus Studies, Capital Improvement Plans, and the adoption of the development impact fees specified will not have a significant impact on the environment and are exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of State CEQA Guidelines because these actions involve the adoption of development impact fees and no specific development is authorized by the adoption of the Nexus Studies, Capital Improvement Plans, or the adoption of new or updated development impact fees.

Furthermore, the Capital Improvement Program is a prioritizing and funding allocation program and cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No physical activity will occur until all required environmental review is conducted at the time the physical improvements prioritized in the Capital Improvement Program are undertaken at a future unspecified date. Therefore, the approval of the Nexus Studies, Capital Improvement Plans associated with the Nexus Studies, and adoption of the development impact fees does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. In addition, the adoption of this Project approves and sets forth a procedure for determining fees for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital projects and equipment necessary to maintain service within existing service areas and is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines 15273(a)(4).

Also, approval of the Capital Improvement Plans associated with the Nexus Studies, is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because the Plan is not a “project” as defined by CEQA, but involves the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities that do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impacts of DIFs on the City’s finances are associated with both increased revenues and expenses. Administrative expenses will be incurred as City staff collect fees and manage the use and application of fee revenues. The City is proposing a two and one-half percent (2.5%) Administrative Fee to cover these costs.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s vision for building upon our past successes to create a world class community by ensuring that the means are available to continue the City’s growth and success.

ATTACHMENTS:

Page 128 ends

Rancho Cucamonga City CouncilApril 16, 2025

Rancho Cucamonga City Council
April 16, 2025