Agenda packet — Rancho Cucamonga City Council, July 16, 2025 (part 8 of 11)

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -19-
The policy must cover all property, roads, buildings, bridge structures, other structures, fixtures, materials, supplies, foundations, pilings, machinery and equipment (excluding contractor’s equipment) that are part of or related to the portions or elements of the construction, and the works of improvement, including permanent and temporary works and on-site materials, and including goods intended for incorporation into the works located at the Property, in storage or in the course of transit to the Property and all improvements that are within the Property. The builder's risk policy must include coverage for:
(a) Any ensuing loss from faulty workmanship or
nonconforming work, including L.E.G. 3 wording, if commercially available; (b) Machinery accidents and operational testing
involving equipment covered by the policy;
(c) Removal of debris, with a sublimit of twenty-five
percent (25%) of the loss subject to a limit of twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000) and insuring the buildings, structures, machinery, equipment, materials, facilities, fixtures and all Properties
(d) Transit, including ocean marine coverage (unless
insured by the supplier or through a separate marine cargo policy), with sub-limits sufficient to insure the full replacement value of any key equipment item; (e) Replacement value of any property or equipment
stored either on or off the Property;
(f) Coverage limits sufficient to insure for the following perils subject to applicable sub-limits for these perils based on the probable maximum loss of the insured property:
(i) Collapse;
(ii) Terrorism;
(iii) Earthquake;
(iv) Flood;
(g) Plans, blueprints and specifications; and
(h) Demolition and increased cost of construction as
required by law or ordinance subject to applicable sub-limits.

There must be no coinsurance penalty provision in any such policy. All deductibles or self-insured retentions must be the sole responsibility of Developer.

The policy must provide a “severability of interests provision,” “multiple insured’s clause” or similar wording that the policy is to apply to each insured as if a separate policy had been issued

Page 987 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -20-
to each insured except as to limits.

Page 988 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -20-
Developer shall also require the general contractor and its subcontractors to procure and maintain (and shall ensure that they do procure and maintain) coverage for tools and equipment owned, leased or used by the general contractor or subcontractors in the performance of their work under this contract.

Upon completion of construction, Developer shall provide evidence of “all risk” property insurance covering the improvements, with coverage sufficient to cover the probable maximum loss of such improvements and alterations made by Developer pursuant to the terms hereof, which must include “all risk” coverage using the ISO Causes of Loss - Special Form or (with approval from the Public Agencies) its equivalent, as well as flood insurance, subject to applicable sub- limits for natural hazard exposures based on the probable maximum loss of such improvements.

5.4General Insurance Requirements.

5.4.1Self Insurance/Deductible. The policy or policies under which coverage is provided by Developer may include a deductible or self-insured retention not in cumulative excess of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) on the condition that:
(a) Each insurance policy expressly provides that the
obligations of the policy issuer to the Insured Party an additional insured are not to be diminished in any way by Developer failure to pay its deductible or self-insured retention obligation for any reason;
(b) Developer provides a declaration under penalty of
perjury by a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) acceptable to the Insured Party and who shall apply a Fiduciary Standard of Care, certifying the accountant has applied Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) guidelines confirming that Developer has sufficient funds and resources to cover any self-insured retentions if the cumulative self- insured retentions from all required insured policies are in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000); and
(c) Developer promptly pays any and all amounts due
under such deductible or self-insured retention in lieu of insurance proceeds that would have been payable if the insurance policies had not included a deductible or self-insured retention amount.

5.4.2Definition of “Self Insurance”. As used in this Section, “self insurance” means that Developer is itself acting as if it were the insurance company providing the insurance required.

5.4.3Evidence of Insurance. Developer shall furnish evidence of insurance reasonably acceptable to the Insured Party before Developer commences physical construction within the Properties. Developer shall also provide the Insured Party with satisfactory evidence of renewal or replacement insurance no later than thirty (30) days after the expiration or termination of such insurance. Developer shall submit full copies of the commercial general liability policy, excess/umbrella liability policy, builder’s risk policy, and the project-specific professional liability policy or binders with full specimen copies of the forms for each policy until such time as full copies of the policies are available. This requirement applies prior to Developer

Page 989 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -21-
starting work on the Properties, including all subsequent renewal policies. Certificates of insurance are required for all other lines of insurance. If, through no fault of Developer, any of

Page 990 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -21-
the coverage required becomes unavailable, Developer shall provide good faith alternative insurance packages and programs, subject to prior approval by the Public Agencies, with the goal of reaching agreement in good faith on a package providing coverage equivalent to that specified herein.

5.4.4Additional Insured Coverage. All Developer insurance policies maintained by Developer, including property insurance, except those forbut excluding Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability insurance, must shall name the Insured Party as additional insured. Developer’s Commercial General Liability insurance policies must be endorsed by ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85, or if not available, then ISO Form CG 20 38, toshall name the Insured Party, including the Public Agencies, as additional insureds using ISO Additional Insured Endorsements CG 20 10 04 13 and CG 20 37 04 13 or endorsements providing equivalent coverage, subject to approve by the Public Agencies. These endorsements shall provide additional insured coverage for both ongoing operations and completed operations, as required under this Agreement. With respect to general liability arising out of or connected with work or operations performed by or on behalf of Developer on the Property, coverage for such additional insureds must not extend to liability to the extent prohibited by California Insurance Code sSection 11580.04 of the Insurance Code. The additional insured endorsements must shall not limit the scope of coverage for the Insured Party to vicarious liability but shall allow instead provide coverage for the Insured Party to the full extent provided afforded by the policy. Insured Party means the Public Agencies and their directors, council members, officers, employees, contractors and agents.

5.4.5Waiver of Subrogation Rights. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Developer hereby waives all rights of recovery under subrogation against the Insured Party, and any other tenant, contractor, subcontractor or sub-subcontractor performing work or rendering services on behalf of the Insured Party, in connection with the planning, development and construction of any improvements. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Developer shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors, of at every tier, to provide a written waiver of subrogation and to include corresponding provisions in their insurance policies. Developer shall require all of the policies and coverages required in this Section to waive all rights of subrogation against the additional insureds (ISO Form CG 24 04 05 09). Such insurance and coverages provided must not prohibit Developer from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss or claim.

5.4.6Eligible Insurers. If policies are written by insurance carriers authorized and admitted to do business in the State of California, then the insurance carriers must have a current A.M. Best rating of A-VIII or better and if policies are written by insurance carriers that are non-admitted but authorized to conduct business in the State of California, then they must meet the current A.M. Best rating of A-:X or better, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Public Agencies.

5.5Coverage Amounts. All insurance coverage amounts hereunder shall be increased every five (5) years based on increases, if any, in the consumer price index.

Page 991 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -22-

2.INDEMNITY.

2.1Indemnity. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.2 below, Developer shall protect, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Public Agencies from and against all claims, demands, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages, and costs, including without limitation any actions or proceedings in connection therewith and reasonable attorneys’ fees related thereto, incurred in connection with, arising from, due to or as a result of the death of, or any accident, injury, loss, or damage, howsoever caused, to, any person or loss or damage arising as a result of Developer’s or Developer’s Permittees’ acts or omissions on or related to the Station Property and the PUDO, including without limitation, the Tunnel Easement Area as defined in the Grant Deed and the Temporary Construction Easement Parking and Staging Easement and the Milliken Parking Easement described in Section Error! Reference source not found. and the Temporary Construction Easement in Section 4.2.6. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.2 below, the Public Agencies shall protect, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Developer from and against all claims, demands, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages, and costs, including without limitation any actions or proceedings in connection therewith and reasonable attorneys’ fees related thereto, incurred in connection with, arising from, due to or as a result of the death of, or any accident, injury, loss, or damage, howsoever caused, to, any person or loss or damage arising as a result of the Public Agencies’ or their Permittees’ acts or omissions on or related to the Surface Property and the PUDO.

2.2General Provisions. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 2, neither Party shall be entitled to indemnification for damage to the extent caused by or arising from its negligence or willful misconduct or the negligence or willful misconduct of its Permittees.

3.ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES. If any Party defaults in the performance of any obligation under this Agreement (“Defaulting Party” with respect to each individual instance of such default), and if such default remains uncured thirty (30) days after written notice from the other Party (“Nondefaulting Party” with respect to each such individual instance of such default), stating with particularity the nature and extent of such default, then Nondefaulting Party shall have the right to (i) perform such obligation on behalf of such Defaulting Party, (ii) be reimbursed by such Defaulting Party within thirty (30) days of written demand therefor, together with interest at the lesser of the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum or the maximum rate permitted by law, and/or (iii) commence an action against the Defaulting Party for injunctive relief (including mandatory injunction or specific performance) and/or damages; and nothing in this Agreement, including without limitation the foregoing language and including that a cure period is provided and that a cure may timely occur, shall limit or be in denigration of the rights and remedies of the Nondefaulting Party, including the right to damages and/or other legal or equitable remedies or relief. The failure of the Nondefaulting Party to insist, in any one or more cases, upon the strict performance of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the future breach of such provision or any other provision of this Agreement.

4.APPROVALS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, no approval shall be unreasonably withheld or delayed. If the Parties are not able to agree on any matter which is to be approved by Party or Parties pursuant to this

Page 992 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -23-
Agreement, the matter shall, upon demand of any Party, be determined pursuant to the provisions set forth below.

Page 993 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -23-

8.1Meet and Confer. If the Parties are unable to resolve a dispute within ten (10) days of written notice of a dispute, the Parties will, at the written request of any Party, require that the matter be reviewed by a senior level executive of each Party (in the case of Developer, by a Senior Vice President or higher, and in the case of the Public Agencies, by the Assistant City Manager or higher or the Deputy Executive Director or higher, as applicable). If senior level executives cannot reach a resolution within ten (10) days of commencing their meet and confer then any Party may seek judicial resolution.

8.2Costs. Each Party will bear its own costs, including attorneys’ fees, which it incurs. In the event the parties use a mediator or arbitrator, they will share equally in the costs of the mediator's services.

9.REVERSIONARY RIGHT.

9.1Reversionary Right. Reference is hereby made to the reversionary right of the Public Agencies with respect to the Station Property as set forth in DDA Section 5.2.2. With respect to such reversionary right, as a matter of clarification, the Parties agree that, if the Public Agencies repay the amount set forth in DDA Section 5.2.2, and there is any secured loan or lien encumbering the Station Property, then the amount paid shall be paid to the secured lender or lienholder to the extent necessary to require a reconveyance/release of the applicable deed of trust or other lien under California law. Additionally, the reversionary right shall no longer apply following the completion of the required improvements set forth in the DDA by Developer and commencement of revenue service on the high speed rail line from the HSR Station.

10.RIGHT OF FIRST NEGOTIATION.

10.1First Negotiation. If the Public Agencies elect to sell all or a portion of the Surface Property and/or the PUDO (which shall be subject to easements and/or licenses provided to Developer), or the Public Agencies receive a bona fide offer to buy all or a portion of the Surface Property and/or PUDO from a purchaser which is acceptable to the Public Agencies, Developer shall have the right of first negotiation to purchase the Surface Property and/or PUDO from the Public Agencies pursuant to the following terms and conditions:

10.1.1Sale Notice. If the Public Agencies elect to sell all or a portion of the Surface Property and/or PUDO, the Public Agencies shall first notify Developer (or its successor owner of the Station Property) in writing before the Surface Property and/or PUDO (or such portion) becomes available for sale to third parties, or if the Public Agencies receive the bona fide offer described above, the Public Agencies shall notify Developer that the Public Agencies have received such an offer (“Sale Notice”). Pursuant to such Sale Notice, the Public Agencies shall then negotiate with Developer to sell the Surface Property and/or PUDO (or such portion) to Developer. The Sale Notice shall set forth the proposed economic terms (including, without limitation, purchase price) and conditions upon which the Public Agencies are willing to sell the Surface Property and/or PUDO (or such portion) (collectively, the “Economic Terms”).

10.1.2Procedure for Acceptance. If Developer wishes to exercise Developer’s right of first negotiation, then within ten (10) business days of the delivery of the Sale Notice to Developer, Developer shall deliver a written notice to the Public Agencies of

Page 994 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -24-
Developer’s exercise of its right of first negotiation, whereupon the Public Agencies and Developer shall then negotiate the terms of the sale for a period of sixty (60) days (“Negotiation Period”). Developer must elect to exercise its right of first negotiation to purchase all of the Surface Property and/or PUDO offered (not less than what is offered). If Developer does not so notify the Public Agencies within the ten (10) business day period, or terms acceptable to the staff of the Public Agencies (which they would recommend to decision-makers for approval) are not reached during the Negotiation Period, then the Public Agencies shall be free to sell the portion of the Surface Property and/or PUDO offered to Developer to anyone the Public Agencies desire on any terms the Public Agencies desire, and Developer shall no longer have any right to purchase such portion of the Surface Property and/or PUDO; provided, however, if the Public Agencies desire to sell such portion of the Surface Property and/or PUDO (i) for less than ninety percent (90%) of the purchase price, or (ii) later than the date which is one year after the Negotiation Period, then the Public Agencies shall be obligated to give another Sale Notice to Developer in accordance with the terms of this Section 10.1.1 above.

10.1.3Agreement. If Developer and the Public Agencies agree on the terms of Developer’s purchase of the Surface Property and/or PUDO (or a portion thereof), then the Public Agencies and Developer shall, within ninety (90) days thereafter, execute a purchase agreement upon which Developer shall agree to purchase the Surface Property and/or PUDO (or a portion thereof) with the following terms: (a) Developer shall complete its due diligence review of the Surface Property and/or PUDO within thirty (30) days following the date of the purchase agreement, (b) the close of escrow under the purchase agreement shall not occur later that thirty (30) days following expiration of the due diligence period, and (c) all remaining terms of the purchase and sale of real property that are in the DDA and not specified in this Section 10.1 shall apply to the purchase and sale transaction.

11. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE/REPAIR.

11.1Azusa Court/Milliken Avenue Intersection. Developer shall construct a traffic signal and associated intersection improvements at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court (“Intersection”) as part of the development and operation of the HSR Station.

11.2Milliken Avenue/Station Property Driveway. Developer intends to utilize a right-in, right-out movement at the driveway entrance to the Station Property from Milliken Avenue (“Driveway”) as part of the development and operation of the HSR Station. With this configurations, the City is not requiring a traffic signal to control traffic at the Driveway.

However, Developer may not utilize a left-in, left-out movement at the Driveway unless and until a fully signalized T-intersection is constructed and installed at the Driveway in accordance with Section 11.4, unless otherwise agreed to by the City.

11.3Anaheim Place/Azusa Court Intersection and Azusa Court/Surface Property Driveway. Developer completed a traffic study to determine whether any additional traffic improvements are required at the intersection of Anaheim Place and Azusa Court and at the driveway entrance to the Surface Property from Azusa Court. Based on the updated traffic study, the intersection of Anaheim Place and Azusa Court shall be designed and constructed as a two- way stop with full buildout to accommodate a future traffic signal, including the installation of conduit, raceway, and sufficient space for future poles and support infrastructure. The intersection

Page 995 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -25-
shall initially operate as a two-way stop, with the traffic signal to be installed by Developer when traffic conditions warrant, as determined by a traffic study to be initiated by Developer five (5) years following the commencement of fare-paying Brightline West train operations, and then every decade thereafter unless updated information (e.g., a dramatic rise in ridership or development) warrants a traffic study earlier than such decade milestone. The cost of the future traffic signal installation shall be allocated among Developer, the City, and SBCTA, on a proportionate basis reflecting the respected uses of the intersection by Brightline West passengers, Metrolink passengers, airport tunnel users, and bus operations. Such traffic study prepared by Developer shall analyze such user shares, subject to the reasonable review and approval of the City and SBCTA. The City shall process all permits for the initial intersection improvements in accordance with the process set forth in Section 11.4. To the extent the City has the legal ability to do so, the City shall collect fair-share contributions from, or impose fair-share contribution conditions on, any future development approvals in the vicinity of the intersection to assist in funding the cost of the future traffic signal. If such contributions are collected by third parties, the amounts shall be shared proportionately with Developer, City, and SBCTA. City shall bear no liability for failing to collect such contributions from any third party.

11.4 Permitting Process for Traffic Improvements. Prior to beginning design of any traffic improvements, Developer’s engineer shall meet with the City Engineer’s traffic engineering staff to determine the appropriate design approach and operational characteristics for each traffic improvement. Developer will submit to the City a complete “Right-of-Way Application,” including plans and specifications (the “Application”) for approval of the construction and installation of each traffic improvement. The City will fairly and, in accordance with the City’s customary practices, promptly process (i) the Application within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days of receipt of the Application from Developer (or its agents, representatives, or designees) and all additional applications by Developer (or its agents, representatives, or designees) for City permits necessary for the construction and installation of each traffic improvement, including not limited to, any requisite construction permits, grading permits, building permits, mechanical permits, electrical permits, drainage permits, permits, and requests for inspections and approvals. The City reserves all rights and inherent duties in processing the Application to conduct a good faith review of the Application and to perform its obligation to not approve an incomplete Application if the Application is missing required technical information or is not in compliance with permit approval requirements. The City agrees to promptly notify Developer in writing of any incomplete items, missing information, and the City permit requirements. Developer shall construct and install all traffic improvements in accordance with then existing City standards. Provided the traffic improvements are accepted and completed in accordance with the foregoing (including applicable permits), the City agrees to accept and maintain all traffic improvements once complete.

12.USE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY. Developer and the Public Agencies cooperatively negotiated the DDA and associated easements to facilitate the development of the HSR Station. As a result thereof and as of the effective date of this Agreement, Developer acknowledges that the only City-owned property to be used for the HSR Station and any related facilities is identified in the DDA. Except as expressly set forth otherwise in the DDA, Developer shall not use or attempt to use the following City-owned property for transit uses as part of the initial development of the HSR Station without the prior written consent of the City in its sole and absolute discretion: (1) the Transit Center described in Exhibit C; (2) the Milliken Site; (3) the

Page 996 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -26-
City-owned property adjacent to the I-15 Freeway and identified as APNs 0229-021-81-0000 and 0229-021-80-0000; and (4) property to be dedicated to the City for public use within the area governed by the Resort Specific Plan on the now-closed Empire Lakes Golf Course located north of Sixth Street, south of the BNSF/Metrolink rail line, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. Developer further acknowledges and agrees that if it needs additional City-owned property as part of the initial development of the HSR Station, it shall cooperatively negotiate directly with the City regarding the acquisition of such additional property. The foregoing shall not constitute a waiver of Developer’s condemnation powers beyond the initial construction of the HSR Station (i.e., does not limit future use for expansions or reconstruction after the initial HSR Station is constructed and operational).

5.PUBLIC ART. If Developer receives approval of the Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements grant (“Grant Approval”), Developer shall design, procure, fabricate, and install public art on the exterior facade of the parking garage as part of the HSR Station subject to the reasonable approval of the City (“Art Installation”), in an amount equal to 1.5% of the amount of such Grant Approval, not to exceed One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000.00). If the City desires to enhance the design, procurement, fabrication or installation costs beyond Developer’s funding commitment as outlined above, the City shall be responsible for any such additional costs. If Developer does not receive Grant Approval, Developer shall have no obligation to install the Art Installation or bear any costs relating thereto; provided, however, Developer shall include in the design of the HSR Station the future potential installation of the Art Installation by the City and shall reasonably cooperate, at no out-of-pocket cost to Developer, with the City regarding with the design, fabrication and installation of the Art Installation.

6.MISCELLANEOUS.

6.1Notices. Except as otherwise provided herein, notice to be given to a Party must be in writing and may be delivered to the Party by nationally reputable overnight courier, charges prepaid, or by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the address below (or alternative address subsequently noted by such Party). Such notice is deemed delivered the first business day after delivery to such courier or, if sent by certified mail, the date of delivery or refusal to accept delivery or inability to deliver shown on the return receipt. A party may change its address(es) for notices by a notice given pursuant to this Section.

City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attn: City Manager
SBCTA: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
1170 W. Third Street, 2nd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92410
Attn: Director of Transit & Rail Programs
With a copy to SBCTA General Counsel
At the SBCTA address above

Page 997 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -27-
Developer: DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC
8329 W. Sunset Road, Suite 150
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Attn: President
With a copy to Developer’s Legal Department
At the Developer address above

14.2Interpretation. This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it be construed to create, a joint venture, a partnership, or any other similar relationship among any of the parties. The captions of the various provisions of this Agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the contents thereof. Any references to “Section” or “Sections” contained in this Agreement shall refer to that “Section” or those “Sections” contained in this Agreement. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

14.3Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes all prior written or verbal representations or declarations of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. For the sake of clarity, the subject matter of the Reserved Easements are separate and distinct from this Agreement and, as such, this Agreement does not apply to, cover or address the Reserved Easements. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency, the Reserved Easements shall control.

14.4Amendments. No addition, modification, amendment or waiver of any part of this Agreement shall be binding or enforceable unless executed in writing by the Parties and recorded in Official Records.

14.5Remedies Cumulative. All remedies provided in this Agreement are cumulative. Therefore, notwithstanding the exercise by a Party of any remedy hereunder, such Party shall have recourse to all other remedies as may be available at law or in equity. The failure of a Party to insist upon strict performance of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any rights or remedies that such Party may have and shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of any provision hereof by the same or any other Party.

14.6Covenants Running with Land. The covenants contained in this Agreement shall constitute covenants running with the land; shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of and appurtenant to, the Station Property, the Surface Property, the PUDO, and any portion thereof or interest therein; and shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the Developer, City, SBCTA and any person having or acquiring any interest therein and their successive owners and assigns.

14.7Recordation; Effective Date. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Official Records and shall be effective upon the date thereof.

14.8Estoppel Certificate. Each Party to this Agreement shall endeavor to issue to the requesting Party, or to any prospective purchaser of such requesting Party’s parcel, within fifteen (15) days after the written request of any other Party, but in all events prior to thirty (30) days after such written request, an estoppel certificate stating (i) whether the Party to whom the request has been directed knows of any default under this Agreement and, if there are known

Page 998 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -28-
defaults, specifying the nature thereof, (ii) whether this Agreement has been modified or amended in any respect and specifying the nature thereof, and (iii) whether this Agreement is, at that time, in full force and effect.

14.9Mechanics’ Liens. If a Party to this Agreement (the “Responsible Party”) shall permit any mechanics’ liens to be filed against another Party’s parcel (an “Affected Party”), the Responsible Party shall either pay the same and have it discharged of record promptly, or take such action as may be required to reasonably and legally object to such lien and the placing of same against such Affected Party’s parcel. In all events, the Responsible Party shall cause the lien to be discharged prior to the entry of judgment for foreclosure of such lien. Upon request of an Affected Party, the Responsible Party shall furnish such security, bond or indemnity to and for the benefit of such Affected Party as may be required to permit a title endorsement or title policy to be issued relating to such Affected Party’s Parcel without showing thereon the effect of such lien.

14.10Duration. Unless terminated by agreement of the Parties, including without limitation execution, acknowledgement and recording in the Official Record of an instrument confirming or otherwise reflecting such termination, this Agreement and each term, easement, covenant, restriction and undertaking contained herein will remain in effect for a term of ninety-nine (99) years following recordation hereof and will automatically be renewed for successive ten (10) year periods thereafter. Termination of this Agreement shall not discharge or excuse any unpaid obligation, and the rights and remedies for collection of any unpaid obligation shall survive the Agreement’s termination. Notwithstanding any election by the Parties to terminate this Agreement, each easement created hereby which benefits the Station Property and/or the Surface Property and its respective owner or owners and Permittees shall be deemed to exist in perpetuity unless it is quitclaimed, or otherwise terminated and extinguished by each Party benefited by such easement. Any Party may request that such easement be documented by separate documentation in the event of a termination of this Agreement.

14.11Severability. If any clause, sentence, or other portion of this Agreement shall become illegal, null, or void for any reason, or shall be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be so, the remaining portions thereof shall remain in full force and effect.

14.12Governmental Powers. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver or modification of any governmental rights or powers of the Public Agencies.

Page 999 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -29-

14.13Force Majeure. Provided that the Party or Parties claiming such delay gives written notice to the other Party or Parties of the nature of the cause of delay within ten (10) business days after the inception of the delay, and not otherwise, if any Party or Parties shall be delayed or hindered in or prevented from the performance of any construction or maintenance obligation required to be performed by such Party or Parties under this Agreement by reason of acts of God, natural disaster (including earthquake, hurricane, flood or severe prolonged adverse weather conditions), the outbreak of a pandemic virus or other pandemic disease, strikes, lockouts, unavailability of materials, failure of power, governmental laws or regulations, a declaration of a national, state or local emergency, directives or orders by a Governmental Authority (including orders by the federal Centers for Disease Control or its successor, or any state, county, or local public health department), riots, insurrections, adverse weather conditions preventing the performance of work as certified to by the licensed architect, engineer, or other individual overseeing the performance of the relevant work, war or other reason beyond such Party’s or Parties’ control, then the time for performance of such act shall be extended for a period equal to the period of such delay. Lack of adequate funds or financial inability to perform is not and shall not be deemed to be a cause beyond the control of a Party or Parties.

14.14Effect of Agreement; Binding Covenants; Equitable Servitudes. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, no rights or privileges conferred by this Agreement upon the Parties hereto shall inure to the benefit of any Permittee or other person or entity other than the Developer, City, SBCTA, or their respective successors and assigns, nor shall any such other person be deemed to be a third-party beneficiary of any of the provisions contained herein. Each and all of the restrictions, covenants, and easements of this Agreement (i) shall constitute equitable servitudes which shall apply to and be binding on the Parties hereto and each and all of their respective successors, assigns, and Permittees; and (ii) are imposed pursuant to a general plan for the improvement and use of the HSR Station and are designed for the mutual benefit of the Parties to this Agreement.

14.15 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of every provision hereof in which time is a factor.

14.16City Manager Authority. The City Manager of the City may give all approvals and make all elections described herein on behalf of the City provided they are in writing.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

Page 1000 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -30-
The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

DEVELOPER:

DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC,
a Nevada limited liability company
By:

Sarah Watterson, President
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
_____________________________
David M. Pickett,
Associate General Counsel
CITY:

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:

L. Dennis Michael Mayor
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
_____________________________
Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney
SBCTA:

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
By:

Art BishopRick Denison,
Board President
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
_______________________________
Julianna K. Tillquist, General Counsel

Page 1001 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -31-

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
On , , before me,
(here insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature
(Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature
(Seal)

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Page 1002 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -32-
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature
(Seal)

Page 1003 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf

EXHIBIT A
-1-

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION OF STATION PROPERTY
[See Attached]

Page 1004 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf

EXHIBIT B
-1-

EXHIBIT B

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION OF SURFACE PROPERTY
[See Attached]

Page 1005 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf

EXHIBIT C
-1-

EXHIBIT C

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION OF TRANSIT PROPERTY

Page 1006 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf
LEGAL

DESCRIPTION AND

DEPICTION OF

TRANSIT

PROPERTY
-2-

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION OF TRANSIT PROPERTY

Page 1007 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf
LEGAL

DESCRIPTION AND

DEPICTION OF

TRANSIT

PROPERTY
-3-

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION OF TRANSIT PROPERTY

Page 1008 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf

EXHIBIT D
-1-

EXHIBIT D

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION OF PUDO
[See Attached]

Page 1009 ends

4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf -1-

EXHIBIT E

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION OF THE ACCESS EASEMENT
[See Attached]

Page 1010 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf (ii)

1. DEFINITIONS..................................................................................................................2

1.1 Agreement .............................................................................................................3

1.2 City........................................................................................................................3

1.3 Developer Permittee..............................................................................................3

1.4 DDA ......................................................................................................................3

1.5 HSR Station...........................................................................................................3

1.6 Metrolink...............................................................................................................3

1.7 Official Records ....................................................................................................3

1.8 Party ......................................................................................................................3

1.9 Permittee................................................................................................................3

1.10 Properties...............................................................................................................3

1.11 PUDO....................................................................................................................3

1.12 Public Agencies Permittee ....................................................................................4

1.13 San Gabriel Subdivision Lease Agreement...........................................................4

1.14 SBCTA..................................................................................................................4

1.15 Station Property.....................................................................................................4

1.16 Surface Property....................................................................................................4

1.17 Transit Center........................................................................................................4

2. USE RESTRICTIONS ......................................................................................................4

2.1 Use Restrictions.....................................................................................................4

2.2 Maintenance and Security .....................................................................................4

3. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONAL OBLIGATIONS...........................................5

3.1 Maintenance and Repair........................................................................................5

3.2 Cooperation ...........................................................................................................6

3.3 Operation of HSR Station .....................................................................................6

3.4 Modifications After Initial Construction...............................................................6

3.5 Operation of PUDO...............................................................................................6

4. EASEMENTS ...................................................................................................................7

4.1 Easements for the Benefit of the Surface Property ...............................................7

4.2 Easements for the Benefit of the Station Property ................................................8

5. INSURANCE..................................................................................................................13

5.1 Public Agency Insurance Requirements .............................................................13

5.2 Developer Insurance Requirements ....................................................................13

5.3 Insurance During Construction ...........................................................................14

5.4 General Insurance Requirements ........................................................................18

5.5 Coverage Amounts..............................................................................................20

Page 1011 ends

Page
4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf (iii)

6. INDEMNITY ..................................................................................................................20

6.1 Indemnity ............................................................................................................20

6.2 General Provisions ..............................................................................................20

7. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES.............................................................................20

8. APPROVALS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION ............................................................21

8.1 Meet and Confer..................................................................................................21

8.2 Costs....................................................................................................................21

9. REVERSIONARY RIGHT.............................................................................................21

9.1 Reversionary Right..............................................................................................21

10. RIGHT OF FIRST NEGOTIATION ..............................................................................21

10.1 First Negotiation..................................................................................................21

11. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE/REPAIR.................22

11.1 Azusa Court/Milliken Avenue Intersection.........................................................23

11.2 Milliken Avenue/Station Property Driveway......................................................23

11.3 Anaheim Place/Azusa Court Intersection and Azusa Court/Surface Property Driveway ..............................................................................................23

11.4 Permitting Process for Traffic Improvements.....................................................23

12. USE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY ...........................................................................24

13. PUBLIC ART..................................................................................................................24

14. MISCELLANEOUS .......................................................................................................24

14.1 Notices.................................................................................................................25

14.2 Interpretation .......................................................................................................25

14.3 Entire Agreement ................................................................................................25

14.4 Amendments........................................................................................................25

14.5 Remedies Cumulative .........................................................................................26

14.6 Covenants Running with Land............................................................................26

14.7 Recordation; Effective Date................................................................................26

14.8 Estoppel Certificate.............................................................................................26

14.9 Mechanics’ Liens ................................................................................................26

14.10 Duration...............................................................................................................26

14.11 Severability..........................................................................................................27

14.12 Governmental Powers .........................................................................................27

14.13 Force Majeure .....................................................................................................27

Page 1012 ends

Page
4877-5650-6677.34
378683.00002/7-2-25/amc/mrf (iv)

14.14 Effect of Agreement; Binding Covenants; Equitable Servitudes........................27

14.15 Time of Essence ..................................................................................................27

14.16 City Manager Authority ......................................................................................27

Page 1013 ends

DATE: July 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager - Administrative Services Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Rick Flinchum, Deputy Finance Director
Kelly Guerra, Special Districts Analyst
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Special Tax Levy for Various Community Facilities Districts and the Special Annual Benefit Assessment for Drainage Area No. 91-2 for the Fiscal Year 2025/26. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2025-048 TO 2025-061) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolutions approving the special tax levy and special annual benefit assessment, as applicable, for the following Community Facilities and Benefit Assessment Districts (each a “District” and collectively the “Districts”) for the Fiscal Year 2025/26:

1. Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin)

2. Community Facilities Districts No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit),

3. Community Facilities Districts No. 2000-03 Special Tax “B” (Rancho Summit),

4. Community Facilities Districts No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2),

5. Community Facilities Districts No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3),

6. Community Facilities Districts No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1),

7. Community Facilities Districts No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2),

8. Community Facilities Districts No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates),

9. Community Facilities Districts No. 2006-01 (Vintner’s Grove),

10. Community Facilities Districts No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66),

11. Community Facilities Districts No. 2017-01 (North Etiwanda),

12. Community Facilities Districts No. 2018-01 (The Resort at Empire Lakes),

13. Community Facilities Districts No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services), and

14. Community Facilities Districts No. 2022-02 (Industrial Area Services), BACKGROUND:

Annually, before the County’s direct assessment enrollment in August, the City Council must adopt a Resolution approving the special tax levy and special benefit assessment for each District.

If approved, staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the levy for each District with the County of San Bernardino to be included in the property owner’s property tax billings.

Although the City Council has previously authorized the formation of the Districts, including the services provided or the bonded indebtedness secured by the Districts, the annual special tax to be levied must be approved annually.

Page 1014 ends

Page 2 ends

2 9
1 7
ANALYSIS:

Community Facilities Districts
Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “1982 Act”), the City Council previously approved the formation of the Districts either by the issuance of bonds to finance infrastructure improvements or for maintenance services within certain geographical boundaries, which formed the Community Facilities Districts.

Districts established through bond issuance cover the repayment of principal, interest, and administrative costs associated with their respective debt service. Generally, these Districts mature around 30 years after issuance when the bonds are fully repaid. All the costs related to the Districts are costs of the Districts, not the City or its General Fund. Thus, all expenses associated with administering the Districts and paying debt service on the bonds are the responsibility of the property owners within the Districts. Additionally, the outstanding indebtedness of the Districts is not an obligation of the City.

Changes in rate increases are only recommended when necessary to ensure that sufficient funds are available to sustain current and future debt service payments.

The following is a summary of the financial considerations used in setting the rate assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26
A 2.0% increase is recommended for CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) and CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2). The increase is necessary to adequately cover their respective debt service payments due in September 2025 and March 2026.

The other Districts’ current rates are sufficient to cover their debt service payments.

The table below provides a summary of each Districts’ total special tax levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26 and maturity date:

District / Name Bond Maturity
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Notes
CFD No. 2000-03
(Rancho Summit) September 2035 $566,112 No change from the prior year.

CFD No. 2001-01
(Improvement Areas Nos. 1 and 2) September 2031 $670,447 No change from the prior year.

CFD No. 2001-01
(Improvement Area No. 3) September 2031 $61,467 No change from the prior year.

CFD No. 2003-01
(Improvement Area No. 1) September 2033 $1,300,345 A 2% increase is recommended to cover debt service.

CFD No. 2003-01
(Improvement Area No. 2) September 2033 $221,968 A 2% increase is recommended to cover debt service.

CFD No. 2004-01
(Rancho Etiwanda Estates) September 2036 $2,350,660 No change from the prior year.

CFD No. 2006-01
(Vintner’s Grove) September 2037 $288,959 No change from the prior year.

CFD No. 2006-02
(Amador on Route 66) September 2037 $183,158 No change from the prior year.

Page 1015 ends

Page 3 ends

2 9
1 7
The remaining CFDs were established to provide maintenance and services for public facilities in perpetuity. Changes in special taxes for these Districts are driven by various factors, including inflation, the rising costs associated with providing services, and the need to secure funding for necessary capital replacement projects.

The following is a summary of the financial considerations used in setting the recommended assessment rates for Fiscal Year 2025/26:
No changes in the actual rate are recommended for CFD 2000-03B, CFD 2017-01, and CFD 2022-02. Staff determined that Districts have adequate funds to sustain their respective operational expenditures.
A 5% increase is recommended for CFD 2018-01 (Residential Property), from $410.70 to $431.24, which is the maximum increase allowable. The increase is necessary to offset estimated increases in operational costs and to ensure funding for essential future capital replacement projects. The Undeveloped Property's actual rate will remain at $347.42 per acre due to the development of new residential properties within the District. A 5% increase is recommended for CFD 2022-01. The increase is necessary to sustain the continuously rising costs, including inflation, relating to the operational and maintenance of streetlights.

The table below provides a summary of each Districts’ total special tax levy for Fiscal Year 2025/26:

District / Name Maximum
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Notes
CFD No. 2000-03
Special Tax “B”
(Rancho Summit)
$1,806.39 $1,560.43 $1,560.43 No change is recommended from the prior year.

District / Name Maximum
Fiscal Year
2024/25
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Notes
CFD No. 2017-01
(North Etiwanda)
Residential Property
$1,179.73 $0 $0
No residential parcels have been
developed; the rate is on hold until
building permits.

CFD No. 2017-01
(North Etiwanda)
Undeveloped Property
$2,865.87 $20/acre $20/parcel
The rate of $20 per acre will adjust
to $20 per parcel to reflect the
upcoming 358 residential
development.

CFD No. 2018-01
(The Resort at
Empire Lakes)
Residential Property
$431.24 $410.70 $431.24
A 5% increase is recommended
due to increased costs for
operations and future capital
replacement plans.

CFD No. 2018-01
(The Resort at
Empire Lakes)
Undeveloped Property
$6,742.09 $347.42 $347.42 No change is recommended from the prior year.

CFD No. 2022-01
(Street Lighting Services)
Tax Zone No. 1
Tax Zone No. 2
Tax Zone No. 3
Tax Zone No. 4
Tax Zone No. 5
Tax Zone No. 6
Tax Zone No. 7
Tax Zone No. 8
$26.49
$87.84
$55.10
$33.84
$74.55
$60.07
$68.53
$44.16
$24.03
$79.68
$49.98
$30.70
$67.62
$54.48
$62.16
$40.06
$25.23
$83.66
$52.48
$32.23
$71.00
$57.21
$65.27
$42.06
A 5% increase is recommended to
sustain the rising cost of
operations, utilities, and streetlight
maintenance.

Page 1016 ends

Page 4 ends

2 9
1 7
CFD No. 2022-02
(Industrial Area Services)
Industrial Property
$6,513.28 $6,203.13 $6,203.13 No change from the prior year.

Benefit Assessments for Drainage Area No. 91-2
The Benefit Assessments for Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin) District consist of 363 residential parcels, which are generally located north of Wilson Ave between Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue.

For Fiscal Year 2025/26, staff determined that the current assessment of $72.17 per residential parcel is sufficient to meet all of the district’s financial obligations. The District's annual assessment pays for the maintenance and servicing of a 27-acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460- linear-foot concrete drainage channel.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Special tax and special annual benefit assessment revenues collected for each District are used for the related public facilities and services, debt service payments, and administration costs of that district only.

The budgets for each District, as shown in the Annual Reports, agree with the City’s Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2025/26, which the City Council approved on June 26, 2025.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s core value of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future by complying with reporting requirements for special taxes and special annual benefit assessment revenues to provide public facilities and services, debt service payments, and administrative costs for the Districts.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution BAD 91-2
Attachment 2 – Annual Status Report – BAD 91-2
Attachment 3 – Resolution CFD 2000-03A (Rancho Summit)
Attachment 4 – Annual Status Report - CFD 2000-03A (Rancho Summit) Attachment 5 – Resolution CFD 2000-03 Special Tax “B”
Attachment 6 – Annual Status Report - CFD 2000-03 Special Tax “B” Attachment 7 – Resolution CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) Attachment 8 – Annual Status Report – CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2) Attachment 9 – Resolution CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) Attachment 10 – Annual Status Report – CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) Attachment 11 – Resolution CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) Attachment 12 – Annual Status Report – CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) Attachment 13 – Resolution CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) Attachment 14 – Annual Status Report – CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) Attachment 15 – Resolution CFD 2004-01
Attachment 16 – Annual Status Report - CFD 2004-01
Attachment 17 – Resolution CFD 2006-01
Attachment 18 – Annual Status Report - CFD 2006-01
Attachment 19 – Resolution CFD 2006-02
Attachment 20 – Annual Status Report – CFD 2006-02
Attachment 21 – Resolution CFD 2017-01
Attachment 22 – Annual Status Report – CFD 2017-01

Page 1017 ends

Page 5 ends

2 9
1 7
Attachment 23 – Resolution CFD 2018-01
Attachment 24 – Annual Status Report – CFD 2018-01
Attachment 25 – Resolution CFD 2022-01
Attachment 26 – Annual Status Report – CFD 2022-01
Attachment 27 – Resolution CFD 2022-02
Attachment 28 – Annual Status Report – CFD 2022-02

Page 1018 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE

TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN
DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 AND

DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertook proceedings to authorize the levy and imposition of benefit assessments to pay for the annual drainage maintenance, including the removal of sediment and debris from the Day Canyon Channel improvements and basin, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Benefit Assessment Act of 1982”, being Chapter

6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 54703), said area of benefit being known and designated as Drainage Area No. 91-2 (the “Drainage Area”); and
WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented to this City Council an annual Supplemental Report (the “Supplemental Report”) to the Final Engineer’s Report for the Drainage Area setting forth a description of the proposed service, cost estimate and assessment schedule for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and
WHEREAS, at this time this City Council desires to determine the cost of providing authorized services to be financed by the levy of a benefit assessment for Fiscal Year 2025/26 and to determine and impose such benefit assessment.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the Supplemental Report is hereby approved and ordered to be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Said Supplemental Report generally consists of the following:

A. A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived through the levy and collection of the benefit assessment;
B. A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment; and
C. The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel.

SECTION 3: That the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment as set forth in the Final Engineer’s Report is hereby adopted and has been utilized as the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment to be levied in Fiscal Year 2025/26.

SECTION 4: That this City Council hereby determines and orders that the benefit assessments described in the Supplemental Report within the Drainage Area are hereby confirmed and levied for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

SECTION 5: That the above confirmed and levied benefit assessment for Fiscal Year 2025/26 shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as general County property taxes are

Page 1019 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of such County taxes shall be applicable to the collection and enforcement of these benefit assessments.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________ 2025.

Page 1020 ends

Page 1021 ends

Page 1022 ends

Page 1023 ends

Page 1024 ends

Page 1025 ends

Page 1026 ends

Page 1027 ends

Page 1028 ends

Page 1029 ends

Page 1030 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF
SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000- 03A (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-03A (Rancho Summit) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the referenced District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report.

SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate.

The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in

Page 1031 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund.

SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report.

SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of _____________ 2025.

Page 1032 ends

ATTACHMENT 4

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03A
(RANCHO SUMMIT)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1033 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2000-03A (Rancho Summit) . 1 Fiscal Year 2025/26

BACKGROUND
On October 11, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-03A (Rancho Summit) (the “District”) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $9,835,000. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax and on September 21, 2005, approved Resolution No. 05-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds.

The District was authorized to finance park improvements including clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north, the 210 Freeway to the south, Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East to the west.

On July 16, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-127 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 in the principal amount of $8,500,000 were issued on July 31, 2014.

By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided annual savings to the property owners of approximately $120,000 for the remaining life of the bond issue.

Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11.

Page 1034 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2000-03A (Rancho Summit) . 2 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03A

ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
1 Residential Property< 1,850 Sq. Ft $1,286.21
2 Residential Property1,850 – 2,049 Sq. Ft $1,430.88
3 Residential Property2,050 – 2,249 Sq. Ft $1,527.32
4 Residential Property2,250 – 2,449 Sq. Ft $1,541.65
5 Residential Property2,450 – 2,649 Sq. Ft $1,552.94
6 Residential Property2,650 – 2,849 Sq. Ft $1,684.05
7 Residential Property2,850 – 3,049 Sq. Ft $1,855.09
8 Residential Property3,050 – 3,049 Sq. Ft $1,904.07
9 Residential Property3,250 – 3,249 Sq. Ft $2,017.09
10 Residential Property=> 3,450 Sq. Ft $2,031.41
11 Non-Residential Property N/A $9,493.97 per Acre
Land Use Class Residential Floor AreaAssigned Special TaxDescription

Page 1035 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2000-03A (Rancho Summit) . 3 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03A

PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies566,120$ Total Proposed Sources 566,120
Uses
Debt Service
Principal Repayments 344,000
Interest Expense 168,250
Subtotal - Debt Service 512,250
Contract Services 2,000
Assessment Administration 19,260
Admin./General Overhead 606
Total Proposed Uses 534,116
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 32,004$

Page 1036 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2000-03A (Rancho Summit) . 4 Fiscal Year 2025/26

Page 1037 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 5
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX “B” FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR
2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-03B (Rancho Summit) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax “B” to be collected for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth Annual Status Report to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by the Ordinance, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of Special Tax “B” shall be used, in whole or in part, for the following:

A. Payment of costs and expenses of the operation and maintenance of authorized parks and parkways and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; B. Payment of an amount necessary to fund or replenish an operating reserve for the costs of the operation of authorized parks and parkways; and
C. Payment of a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses as such term is defined in the Modified Rate and Method.

The proceeds of Special Tax “B” shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5: Special Tax “B” shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem

Page 1038 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 3 of 2
5 8
6 5
property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund.

SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of Special Tax “B,” and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________ 2025.

Page 1039 ends

ATTACHMENT 6

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03B
(RANCHO SUMMIT)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1040 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2000-03B 1 Fiscal Year 2025/26

BACKGROUND
On August 16, 2000, the City Council approved Resolution No. 00-149 and established Community Facilities District No. 2000-03B, (the “District”). On October 11, 2000, the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax and on September 21, 2005, approved Resolution No. 05-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds.

The District was authorized to finance park improvements, including, clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north, the 210 Freeway to the south, Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East to the west.

Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non-Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11.

Annually on July 1, the Maximum Special Tax “B” shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a minimum annual increase of two percent (2.0%) and a maximum annual increase of six percent (6.0%) per Fiscal Year.

For FY 2025/26, the current rate provides sufficient revenues to meet the District’s expenses and there is no need for an increase. The Maximum Special Tax “B” increased by 5.0% compared to FY 2024/25.

Fiscal YearCPI Rate
Maximum
Assessment per
EBU
Actual
Assessment per
EBU
2021/22 4.00% $1,529.83 $1,529.83
2022/23 2.00% $1,560.43 $1,560.43
2023/24 5.00% $1,638.45 $1,560.43
2024/25 5.00% $1,720.38 $1,560.43
2025/26 5.00% $1,806.39 $1,560.43

Page 1041 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2000-03B 2 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03B

ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Land Use
Class Description Residential Floor Area
Maximum
Special Tax B
1 - 10 Residential Property<1850 Sq. Ft to => 3,450 Sq. Ft1,806.39$ COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03B

PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies561,760$ Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 4,940
Total Proposed Sources 566,700
Uses
Personnel Services 297,700
Operations and Maintenance 55,000
Contract Services 230,770
Utilities 117,752
Assessment Administration 1,290
Admin./General Overhead 118,115
Total Proposed Uses 820,627
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (253,927)$

Page 1042 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2000-03B 3 Fiscal Year 2025/26

Page 1043 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 7
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 AND 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the “Prior Special Tax Bonds”); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-149 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report.

SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and
D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate.

Page 1044 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ________ day of _____________ 2025.

Page 1045 ends

ATTACHMENT 8

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 AND 2)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1046 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 1 Fiscal Year 2025/26

BACKGROUND
On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2) (the “District”) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000. On August 15, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds.

Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001, to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District; including, improvements to Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line and Arbor; landscaping improvements within public right-of-way; and storm drain and flood control improvements.

On December 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012, in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date.

On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015.

By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, which translated to a 12.09% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners.

The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations.

Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below.

The property in Improvement Area No. 1 is residential in use. The property in Improvement Area No. 2 is primarily commercial and contains Victoria Gardens.

Page 1047 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 2 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01

ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26

LAND USE

CLASS DESCRIPTIONRESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREAASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1 Single Family Property => 3,250 Sq Ft $1,115.90 per Dwelling Unit 2 Single Family Property2,950 to 3,249 Sq Ft $894.84 per Dwelling Unit 3 Single Family Property2,650 to 2,949 Sq Ft$805.04 per Dwelling Unit 4 Single Family Property2,350 to 2,649 Sq Ft$691.32 per Dwelling Unit 5 Single Family Property2,150 to 2,349 Sq Ft$646.69 per Dwelling Unit 6 Single Family Property1,950 to 2,149 Sq Ft$594.61 per Dwelling Unit 7 Single Family Property < 1,950 Sq Ft $498.43 per Dwelling Unit 8 Apartment Property Not Applicable $125.94 per Dwelling Unit 9 Non-Residential PropertyNot Applicable $4,462.52 per Acre IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1

LAND USE

CLASS DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX
1 Apartment Property $125.94 Per Dwelling Unit
2 Other Residential Property $5,721.95 per Acre
3 Non-Residential Property$0.33 Per Sq Ft. of Non-Residential Floor Area IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2

Page 1048 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 3 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01

PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies670,450$ Total Proposed Sources 670,450
Uses
Debt Service
Principal Repayments 475,000
Interest Expense 122,320
Subtotal - Debt Service 597,320
Contract Services 2,000
Assessment Administration 55,900
Admin./General Overhead 1,107
Total Proposed Uses 656,327
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 14,123$

Page 1049 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 4 Fiscal Year 2025/26

Page 1050 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 9
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the “Prior Special Tax Bonds”); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-150 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and
D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate.

Page 1051 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ______________ 2025.

Page 1052 ends

ATTACHMENT 10

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1053 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) Fiscal Year 2025/26
1 BACKGROUND
On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 3) (the “District”) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000. On August 15, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds.

On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015.

By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, which translated to a 6.29% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners.

The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations.

Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within each Zone of Improvement Area No. 3 shall be classified as Taxable or Non-Taxable Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the section below.

Page 1054 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) Fiscal Year 2025/26
2 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01

ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26

TAXABLE

ACREAGEBOND SHAREASSIGNED TAX

PER ACRE
ZONE 7-LEGGIO 37.48 8.30% $1,640.00
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01

PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies61,470$ Total Proposed Sources 61,470
Uses
Debt Service
Principal Repayments 46,000
Interest Expense 11,860
Subtotal - Debt Service 57,860
Admin./General Overhead 104
Total Proposed Uses 59,964
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 1,506$

Page 1055 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) Fiscal Year 2025/26
3

Page 1056 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 11
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in

Page 1057 ends

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of _____________ 2025.

Page 1058 ends

ATTACHMENT 12

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1059 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) Fiscal Year 2025/26
1 BACKGROUND
On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,645,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax and on May 21, 2003, approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds.

The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 147 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 1. The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church, north of Arrow and east of the Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow north, to Foothill and Day Creek from Foothill north, to Church. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community.

Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003, to share in the provision of funds for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line and Arbor; storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District; and a cultural center owned by the City, that includes a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room.

On July 3, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-110 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013, in the principal amount of $14,170,000 were issued on July 30, 2013. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date.

The rates for the District will increase by 2.0 % in Fiscal Year 2025/26 to meet fiscal obligations for the District. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations.

Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1, Zone 2 and Zone 3 of the District shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below.

Page 1060 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) Fiscal Year 2025/26
2 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1)
Annual Special Tax Fiscal Year 2025/26
ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX(per acre)
BACKUP SPECIAL TAX(per acre) NOTEZONE 1 DEVELOPED PROPERTY $6,724.88 $7,417.61 Both Assigned and Backup can increase 2% every year ZONE 1 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY $0.00 $7,417.61 Backup can increase 2% every year ZONE 2 DEVELOPED PROPERTY $12,165.53 $62,344.72 Both Assigned and Backup can increase 2% every year ZONE 2 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY $0.00 $19,814.83 Backup can increase 2% every year ZONE 3 DEVELOPED PROPERTY $11,368.14 $17,644.27 Both Assigned and Backup can increase 2% every year ZONE 3 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY $0.00 $17,644.27 Backup can increase 2% every year Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies1,300,350$ Total Proposed Sources 1,300,350
Uses
Debt Service
Principal Repayments 730,000
Interest Expense 471,360
Subtotal - Debt Service 1,201,360
Contract Services 2,000
Assessment Administration 23,910
Admin./General Overhead 915
Total Proposed Uses 1,228,185
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 72,165$

Page 1061 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) Fiscal Year 2025/26
3

Page 1062 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 13
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in

Page 1063 ends

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of _____________2025.

Page 1064 ends

ATTACHMENT 14

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1065 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) Fiscal Year 2025/26
1 BACKGROUND
On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) (the “District”) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax and on May 21, 2003, approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds.

The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 82 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 2 (Zones 1 and 2). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church, north of Arrow and east of Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow north, to Foothill and Day Creek from Foothill north, to Church. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community.

On September 17, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-162 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013, in the principal amount of $2,784,000 were issued on September 30, 2013. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date.

Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the District shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below.

Page 1066 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) Fiscal Year 2025/26
2 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01
(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2)
Annual Special Tax Fiscal Year 2025/26

ASSIGNED

SPECIAL TAX
(per acre)
BACKUP

SPECIAL TAX
(per acre) NOTE
ZONE 1

DEVELOPED
PROPERTY $2,702.34 $4,808.00
Both Assigned and
Backup can
increase 2% every
year
ZONE 1

UNDEVELOPED
PROPERTY $0.00 $4,808.00
Backup can
increase 2% every
year
ZONE 2

DEVELOPED
PROPERTY $8,212.97 $14,567.77
Both Assigned and
Backup can
increase 2% every
year
ZONE 2

UNDEVELOPED
PROPERTY $0.00 $14,567.77
Backup can
increase 2% every
year
Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies221,970$ Total Proposed Sources 221,970
Uses
Debt Service:

Principal Repayments 144,000
Interest Expense 73,490
Subtotal - Debt Service 217,490
Contract Services 2,500
Assessment Administration 5,960
Admin./General Overhead 277
Total Proposed Uses 226,227
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (4,257)$

Page 1067 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) Fiscal Year 2025/26
3

Page 1068 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 15
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO
ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in

Page 1069 ends

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of _______________ 2025.

Page 1070 ends

ATTACHMENT 16

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01
(RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1071 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) Fiscal Year 2025/26
1 BACKGROUND
On September 15, 2004, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (the “District”) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $45,000,000.

On October 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 735 approving the levy of the special tax and on June 7, 2006, approved Resolution No. 06-185 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on July 13, 2006, to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities, to serve property located within the District.

The District was authorized to finance the following improvements:
Day Creek Boulevard - grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping,
Etiwanda Avenue - grading, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets, and landscaping; Cucamonga Valley Water District ("CVWD") reservoir transmission main, Storm drain facilities including the northern property line storm drain and the Etiwanda Avenue storm drain,
Park facilities,
Equestrian facilities,
School facilities now owned by the Etiwanda School District and by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District,
Water and sewer facilities now owned by CVWD which were authorized and financed from the proceeds of capacity charges levied by CVWD, Flood control facilities now owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and
Open space owned by the County of San Bernardino.

On January 15, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-005 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 in the principal amount of $34,384,000 were issued on February 07, 2014. This amount represented the outstanding principal of the original bonds as of this date.

The annual special tax is based on the square footage of the home for residential properties. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations.

Page 1072 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) Fiscal Year 2025/26
2 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01
(RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES)
Term of Special Tax
The Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years commencing with Fiscal Year 2005/06 provided, however, that special taxes will cease to be levied in an earlier fiscal year if the Community Facilities District Administrator has determined (i) that all required interest and principal payments on the District’s bonds have been paid; and (ii) all authorized facilities have been constructed.

Annual Special Tax for FY 2025/26
Land Use CategoryDeveloped Floor Area
Maximum
Special Tax
Actual
Special Tax
1-Residential PropertyGreater than 4,000 sq ft$5,555 per unit$4,280 per unit 2-Residential Property3,801 - 4,000 sq ft$5,325 per unit$4,103 per unit 3-Residential Property3,601 - 3,800 sq ft$5,151 per unit$3,969 per unit 4-Residential Property3,401 - 3,600 sq ft$4,896 per unit$3,772 per unit 5-Residential PropertyLess than 3,400 sq ft$4,410 per unit$3,398 per unit 6-Non-Residential PropertyNA $14,800 per acre$0.00 per acre

Page 1073 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) Fiscal Year 2025/26
3 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01
(RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES)
Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Estimated Assessments and Net of Estimated Delinquencies2,350,660$ Interest Revenue 20
Total Proposed Sources 2,350,680
Uses
Debt Service
Principal Repayments 1,451,000
Interest Expense 891,140
Subtotal - Debt Service 2,342,140
Contract Services 2,000
Assessment Administration 18,770
Admin./General Overhead 1,825
Total Proposed Uses 2,364,735
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (14,055)$

Page 1074 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) Fiscal Year 2025/26
4

Page 1075 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 17
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01
(VINTNER’S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner’s Grove) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the “Prior Special Tax Bonds”); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-151 on August 5, 2015, established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and
D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate.

Page 1076 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ______________ 2025.

Page 1077 ends

ATTACHMENT 18

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01
VINTNER’S GROVE

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1078 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner’s Grove) Fiscal Year 2025/26
1 BACKGROUND
On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner’s Grove) (the “District”) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $5,800,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 769 approving the levy of the special tax and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-401 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located on the south side of Arrow, east of Center, north of 26th and west of Haven.

Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007, to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of- way and water and sewer improvements.

On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015.

By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 37.85% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners.

This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations.

Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below.

Page 1079 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner’s Grove) Fiscal Year 2025/26
2 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01
(VINTNER’S GROVE)
Annual Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Floor Plan Home Size (Sq. Ft.)Number of UnitsSpecial Tax Tri-Plex Plan 1 1,335 26 $1,444.32
Tri-Plex Plan 2 1,803 26 $1,664.32
Tri-Plex Plan 3 1,920 26 $1,723.98
SFD Plan 4 2,188 28 $1,932.18
SFD Plan 5 2,627 28 $2,099.98
SFD Plan 6 3,173 22 $2,291.39
Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies288,960$ Interest Revenue 10
Total Proposed Sources 288,970
Uses
Debt Service
Principal Repayments 159,000
Interest Expense 96,530
Subtotal - Debt Service 255,530
Contract Services 2,000
Assessment Administration 12,100
Admin./General Overhead 574
Total Proposed Uses 270,204
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 18,766$

Page 1080 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner’s Grove) Fiscal Year 2025/26
3

Page 1081 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 19
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and
WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the “Prior Special Tax Bonds”); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-152 on August 5, 2015, established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and
D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate.

Page 1082 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ________ day of _________ 2025.

Page 1083 ends

ATTACHMENT 20

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02
(AMADOR ON ROUTE 66)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1084 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) Fiscal Year 2025/26
1 BACKGROUND
On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) (the “District”) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,980,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 770 approving the levy of the special tax and on December 20, 2006, approved Resolution No. 06-402 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located south of Garcia, east of Etiwanda, north of Foothill and west of East.

By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, which translated to a 28.42% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners.

This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations.

Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below.

Page 1085 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) Fiscal Year 2025/26
2 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) Annual Special Tax Fiscal Year 2025/26
Land Use ClassDescription Residential Floor AreaResidential Floor Area 1 Single Family Detached Property>1,850 Sq. Ft. $ 2,015.67/DU 2 Single Family Detached Property1,601 - 1,850 Sq. Ft. $ 1,930.49/DU 3 Single Family Detached Property1,351 - 1,600 Sq. Ft. $ 1,767.29/DU 4 Single Family Detached Property<1,351 $ 1,604.09/DU
5 Non-Residential Property N/A $ 46,345.26/ACRE
Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies183,160$ Interest Revenue 10
Total Proposed Sources 183,170
Uses
Debt Service
Principal Repayments 93,000
Interest Expense 57,060
Subtotal - Debt Service 150,060
Contract Services 2,000
Assessment Administration 12,110
Admin./General Overhead 523
Total Proposed Uses 164,693
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 18,477$

Page 1086 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) Fiscal Year 2025/26
3

Page 1087 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 21
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF

SPECIAL TAX FOR NORTH ETIWANDA COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2017-01 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as North Etiwanda Community Facilities District No. 2017-01 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to the maintenance of certain improvements by the District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth Annual Status Report to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used, in whole or in part, for the following:

A. Payment of costs and expenses of the operation, maintenance, and servicing of authorized services pursuant to the Act;
B. Payment of an amount necessary to fund or replenish an operating or capital reserve for the District; and
C. Payment of a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses as such term is defined in the Amended Rate and Method.

The proceeds of the special tax shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5: Special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of

Page 1088 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
5 8
8 0
any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund and reserve fund.

SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of special tax and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report.

SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the District a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of _____________ 2025.

Page 1089 ends

ATTACHMENT 22

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2017-01
(NORTH ETIWANDA)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1090 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2017-01 (North Etiwanda) 1 Fiscal Year 2025/26

BACKGROUND
On May 2, 2018, the City Council approved Resolution No. 18-029, and established North Etiwanda Community Facilities District No. 2017-01, (the “District”). On May 2, 2018, the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On May 16, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 928 approving the levy of the special tax.

The District was authorized to finance the maintenance of public trails and trailhead improvements, landscaped areas, parkways, medians and parks and recreation improvements throughout the District and public right-of-ways, including, but not limited to, street trees, fencing, irrigation systems, sidewalks, drainage systems, signs, monuments, graffiti removal, replacement, repair or rehabilitation of playground equipment, sports fields, parking lots, restrooms, sport field lighting, street lighting and other improvements placed in parks, trails, medians, landscaped areas, or public right- of-ways, furnishing of water, electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the operation of any improvement within the District. The maintenance and servicing of streetlights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to furnishing of electric current, materials, contracted services, and the necessary maintenance, replacement, and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition.

On, July 1 of each Fiscal Year, commencing on July 1, 2019, the Maximum Annual Special Tax set forth in the table below shall be increased by a minimum of two percent (2%) to a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%), determined on an annual basis as needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement.

Page 1091 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2017-01 (North Etiwanda) 2 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2017-01
(NORTH ETIWANDA)
Maximum Special Tax
Fiscal Year
Percentage
Rate Property Description
Maximum Annual
Special Tax
Residential Property 999.11
Undeveloped Property 2,427.11
Residential Property 1,019.09
Undeveloped Property 2,475.65
Residential Property 1,070.05
Undeveloped Property 2,599.43
Residential Property 1,123.55
Undeveloped Property 2,729.40
Residential Property 1,179.73
Undeveloped Property 2,865.872025/26 5.00%
2024/25 5.00%
2023/24 5.00%
2022/23 2.00%

2.00%2021/22
Annual Special Tax
Property Land Use
Residential Property $0.00Per Single Family Residence
Non-Residential Property0.00Per Acre
Undeveloped Property20.00Per Parcel
Actual Annual Special Tax
Fiscal Year 2025/26
Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies7,160$ Total Proposed Sources 7,160
Uses
Assessment Administration 1,200
Admin./General Overhead 54
Total Proposed Uses 1,254
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 5,906$

Page 1092 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2017-01 (North Etiwanda) 3 Fiscal Year 2025/26

Page 1093 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 23
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF

SPECIAL TAX FOR THE RESORT AT EMPIRE LAKES COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2018-01 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as The Resort at Empire Lakes Community Facilities District No. 2018-01 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to the maintenance of certain improvements by the City, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of special tax to be collected for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth Annual Status Report to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used, in whole or in part, for the following:

The proceeds of the special tax shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5: Special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable

Page 1094 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund and reserve fund.

SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of special tax and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _______ day of _____________ 2025.

Page 1095 ends

ATTACHMENT 24

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2018-01
(THE RESORT AT EMPIRE LAKES)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1096 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2018-01 (The Resort at Empire Lakes) 1 Fiscal Year 2025/26

BACKGROUND
On December 19, 2018, the City Council approved Resolution No. 18-136, and established The Resort at Empire Lakes Community Facilities District No. 2018-01, (the “District”). On December 19, 2018, the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District.

On March 20, 2024, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2024-014, and authorized the annexation and the annual levy of the territory identified as Annexation No. 1 into the existing CFD 2018-01.

The District was authorized to finance:
(a) (i) the maintenance of streets, public trails and trailhead improvements, landscaped areas, parkways, medians, and parks and recreation improvements and public right-of-ways, including, but not limited to, street trees, fencing, irrigation systems, sidewalks, drainage systems, signs, monuments, graffiti removal, replacement, repair or rehabilitation of playground equipment, sports fields, parking lots, restrooms, sport field lighting, street lighting, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities and other improvements placed in parks, trails medians, landscaped areas, or public right-of-ways, furnishing of water, electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the operation of any improvement within the City, (ii) the equipping, furnishing and maintenance of public safety improvements; (iii) the furnishing of any service authorized under the Act, as may be amended from time to time, (iv) the furnishing of electric current, materials, contracted services, and the necessary maintenance, replacement, and repair required to keep such improvements in operational and satisfactory condition; and (v) the establishment of a reserve fund for the replacement of any such improvements; and
(b) the incidental expenses which will be incurred, including but not limited to: (i) all costs associated with the formation of the District, the determination of the amount of and collection of special taxes, the payment of special taxes, and costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District, and (ii) any other expenses incidental to the provision of the Services.

On July 1 of each Fiscal Year, commencing on July 1, 2020, the dollar amount per EBU for Developed Property and the dollar amount per acre of Undeveloped Property shall be increased by a minimum of two percent (2%) to a maximum of six percent (6%), determined on an annual basis as needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement.

For FY 2025/26, the rate will increase from $410.70 to $431.24, representing a 5.0% increase per residential unit. The increase is necessary to sustain the District’s operational costs and future capital replacement.

Page 1097 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2018-01 (The Resort at Empire Lakes) 2 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2018-01
(THE RESORT AT EMPIRE LAKES)
Land Use Equivalent to EBUs
Property Land Use
Residential Property 1 EBU Per Residential Dwelling Unit Non-Residential Property Less than 1 Acre 2 EBUs Per Parcel Non-Residential Property More than 1 Acre 2 EBUs Per Acre or portion of thereof Mixed Use Property
Equivalent Benefit Unit Assigment
The EBU assigment of each Assessor's Parcel of Mixed Use Property is equal the total of (i) the Assigned Special Tax that would be Applicable to Such Assessor's Parcel if it was classified only as Residential Property and (ii) the Assigned Special Tax that would be applicable to such Assessor's Parcel if it was classified as Non-Residential Property.

Maximum Special Tax
Fiscal Year
Percentage
Rate Property Description
Maximum Annual
Special Tax
Residential Property 358.25
Undeveloped Property 5,881.15
Residential Property 369.00
Undeveloped Property 6,057.58
Residential Property 387.45
Undeveloped Property 6,360.46
Residential Property 410.70
Undeveloped Property 6,742.09
Residential Property 431.24
Undeveloped Property 7,079.19
2022/23 3.00%
2021/22 6.00%
2025/26 5.00%
2024/25 6.00%
2023/24 5.00%
Actual Annual Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Property Land Use
Developed Property$431.24Per EBU
Undeveloped Property$347.42Per Acre
Actual Annual Special Tax

Page 1098 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2018-01 (The Resort at Empire Lakes) 3 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2018-01
(THE RESORT AT EMPIRE LAKES)
Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies599,040$ Tranfers Into Capital Reserves 200,000
Total Proposed Sources 799,040
Uses
Operation & Maintenance 16,490
Contract Services 20,580
Utilities 6,988
Assessment Administration 1,850
General Overhead 600
Transfer to Special Districts for Services and Facilites 344,650 Transfer Out to Capital Reserves 200,000
Total Proposed Uses 591,158
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 207,882$
Reserved Funds
Operating Capital TotalReserve Reserve Reserve
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2025$43,373 $574,767 $618,140Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2025/267,882 200,000 207,882Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2026$51,255 $774,767 $826,022

Page 1099 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2018-01 (The Resort at Empire Lakes) 4 Fiscal Year 2025/26

Page 1100 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 25
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF
SPECIAL TAX FOR THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
2022-01 (STREET LIGHING SERVICES) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to the maintenance of certain improvements by the City, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used, in whole or in part, for the following:

The proceeds of the special tax shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

Page 1101 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund and reserve fund.

SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of special tax and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ________ day of ___________ 2025.

Page 1102 ends

ATTACHMENT 26

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-01
(STREET LIGHTING SERVICES)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1103 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) 1 Fiscal Year 2025/26

BACKGROUND
On June 1, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2022-061, and established Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) of Rancho Cucamonga, (the “District”). On June 1, 2022, the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On June 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1005 approving the levy of the special tax.

The District was authorized to finance any services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2022-01, authorized pursuant to Section 53313 of the Act, including but not limited to all costs attributable to maintaining and servicing street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout CFD No. 2022-01. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement, and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition.

In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may be expended to pay "Administrative Expenses," as said term is defined in the Rate and Method. of a reserve fund for the replacement of any such improvements.

On July 1 of each Fiscal Year, commencing on July 1, 2022, the Maximum Annual Special Tax set forth in the tables below shall be increased by a minimum of two percent (2%) to a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%), determined on the annual basis as needed to satisfy the Special Tax requirement.

For FY 2025/26, all Tax Zones rates will increase by 5.0% per residential unit. The increase is necessary to sustain the annual operational costs and maintenance of streetlights.

Page 1104 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) 2 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-01
(STREET LIGHTING SERVICES)
Maximum and Actual Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Property Land Use Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Actual Special
Tax Rate
Per
Unit/Acre/Parcel
Single Family Residential Property$26.49 $25.23 Unit
Multi-Family Residential Property$26.49 $25.23 Unit
Non-Residential Property $52.98 $50.46 Acre
Undeveloped Property $233.73 $222.60 Parcel
Property Land Use Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Actual Special
Tax Rate
Per
Unit/Acre/Parcel
Single Family Residential Property$87.84 $83.66 Unit
Multi-Family Residential Property$87.84 $83.66 Unit
Undeveloped Property $233.73 $222.60 Parcel
Property Land Use Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Actual Special
Tax Rate
Per
Unit/Acre/Parcel
Single Family Residential Property$55.10 $52.48 Unit
Multi-Family Residential Property$55.10 $52.48 Unit
Non-Residential Property $110.21 $104.96 Acre
Undeveloped Property $233.73 $222.60 Parcel
Property Land Use Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Actual Special
Tax Rate
Per
Unit/Acre/Parcel
Single Family Residential Property$33.85 $32.24 Unit
Multi-Family Residential Property$33.85 $32.24 Unit
Non-Residential Property $67.70 $64.48 Acre
Undeveloped Property $233.73 $222.60 Parcel
Tax Zone No. 1 - Arterials
Tax Zone No. 2 - Residential Local Streets
Tax Zone No. 3 - Victoria Planned Community
Tax Zone No. 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community

Page 1105 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) 3 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-01
(STREET LIGHTING SERVICES)
Maximum and Actual Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2025/26 (Continue) Property Land Use Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Actual Special
Tax Rate
Per
Unit/Acre/Parcel
Single Family Residential Property$74.55 $71.00 Unit
Undeveloped Property $233.73 $222.60 Parcel
Property Land Use Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Actual Special
Tax Rate
Per
Unit/Acre/Parcel
Non-Residential Property $60.06 $57.20 Acre
Undeveloped Property $233.73 $222.60 Parcel
Property Land Use Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Actual Special
Tax Rate
Per
Unit/Acre/Parcel
Single Family Residential Property$68.53 $65.27 Unit
Multi-Family Residential Property$68.53 $65.27 Unit
Non-Residential Property $137.07 $130.54 Acre
Undeveloped Property $233.73 $222.60 Parcel
Property Land Use Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Actual Special
Tax Rate
Per
Unit/Acre/Parcel
Single Family Residential Property$44.16 $42.06 Unit
Multi-Family Residential Property$44.16 $42.06 Unit
Non-Residential Property $88.33 $84.12 Acre
Undeveloped Property $233.73 $222.60 Parcel
Tax Zone No. 7 - North Etiwanda
Tax Zone No. 8 - South Etiwanda
Tax Zone No. 5 - Caryn Planned Community
Tax Zone No. 6 - Commerical Industrial

Page 1106 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) 4 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-01
(STREET LIGHTING SERVICES)
Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds
Fiscal Year 2025/26 BudgetSources
Taxes:Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies45,080Total Proposed Sources 45,080 Uses
Assessment Administration 30Transfers OutSLD 1 14,320SLD 2 22,220SLD 6 8,550Subtotal - Transfer Out 45,090 Total Proposed Uses 45,120
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (40)
FY 2025/26 Annexations
Annexation No. APN Annexation DateTotal Units/AcresProperty Type 2024-1 1062-401-69 3/6/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-2 1043-151-28 3/6/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-3 0202-131-41 3/6/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-4 0209-101-10 3/6/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-5 0207-241-45 6/5/2024 0.42 Commercial
2024-6 1074-561-16 3/6/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-7 1061-381-17 3/6/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-8 1061-211-07 3/6/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-9 0225-122-71 6/5/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-10 0202-061-17 6/5/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-11 0209-151-36 11/20/2024 8.09 Industrial
2024-12 1061-231-13 10/2/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-13 0201-821-51 10/2/2024 64.00 Multi-Family Residence 2024-14 1074-501-02 10/2/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence 2024-15 0208-152-18 10/2/2024 2.00 Units/0.07 Acres Mix-Use 2024-16 1062-531-04 12/4/2024 1.00 Single-Family Residence

Page 1107 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) 5 Fiscal Year 2025/26

Page 1108 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 27
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF
SPECIAL TAX FOR THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
2022-02 (INDUSTRIAL AREA SERVICES) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2022-02 (Industrial Area Services) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to the maintenance of certain improvements by the City, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used, in whole or in part, for the following:

The proceeds of the special tax shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

Page 1109 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 2
administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.

SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund and reserve fund.

SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of special tax and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ________ day of ____________ 2025.

Page 1110 ends

ATTACHMENT 28

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-02
(INDUSTRIAL AREA SERVICES)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1111 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2022-02 (Industrial Area Services) 1 Fiscal Year 2025/26

BACKGROUND
On June 1, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2022-062, and established Community Facilities District No. 2022-02 (Industrial Area Services) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, (the “District”). On June 1, 2022, the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On June 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1006 approving the levy of the special tax.

The District was authorized to finance any services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2022-02, authorized pursuant to Section 53313 of the Act, including but not limited to all costs attributed to maintaining and servicing landscape and tree maintenance, storm drain repair and maintenance, streets and roadway services, police safety calls and service, and creating a capital reserve account for any future industrial repairs and maintenance.

In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may be expended to pay "Administrative Expenses" as said term is defined in the Rate and Method.

For FY 2025/26, the Maximum Special Tax rates will increase by 5.0%. The Actual Tax rate remains as previous year.

Page 1112 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2022-02 (Industrial Area Services) 2 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-02

INDUSTRIAL AREA SERVICES
Maximum Special Tax and Actual Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2025/26 Property Land Use
Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Actual Special
Tax Rate
Per
Acre/ADU/Parcel
Industrial Property $ 6,513.28 $ 6,203.12 Acre Mixed Use Property 13,389.39 12,751.80 Acre Accessory Dwelling Units 814.16 775.39 ADU Undeveloped Property 222.60 212.00 Parcel Tax Zone No. 1
Proposed Sources and Uses of Funds
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies794,450$ Total Proposed Sources 794,450
Uses
Assessment Administration 20
Total Proposed Uses 20
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 794,430$
FY 2025/26 Annexations
The following annexation is effective for this fiscal year.

Annexation No. APN Annexation DateTotal Units/AcresProperty Type Annexation 2024-10209-151-36 11/20/2024 8.09 Industrial

Page 1113 ends

Community Facilities District No. 2022-02 (Industrial Area Services) 3 Fiscal Year 2025/26

Page 1114 ends

DATE:July 16, 2025
TO:President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
Kelly Guerra, Special Districts Analyst
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolutions Approving the Special Tax Levy for Community Facilities Districts Nos. 85-1 and 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2025/26. (RESOLUTION NOS. FD 2025-017 AND FD 2025-018) (FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Fire Board adopt the Resolutions approving the special tax levy for Community Facilities Districts Nos. 85-1 and 88-1 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for the Fiscal Year 2025/26.

BACKGROUND:

Annually, before the County's direct assessment enrollment deadline in August, the Fire Board must adopt a Resolution approving the special tax levy as reflected in each District's respective Annual Status Report. If approved, staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the special tax levy for each District with the County of San Bernardino to be included in the property owners’ property tax billings.

ANALYSIS:

Each District has specific facilities based on its boundaries and the community it serves. Annually, staff performs a financial analysis of the revenues and expenditures to ensure the financial stability of each District, which takes into account the current operational requirements as well as the expected needs for future capital improvements in the Districts.

The recommended rates are intended to meet the Districts' operational and capital improvement needs for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2025/26. Numerous external factors, such as inflation, increased calls for service, and current and future capital improvements, impact the recommended rates.

A summary of the analysis for each District for Fiscal Year 2025/26:
An increase from $165.00 to $176.55, or 7.0% but below the maximum allowable rate of $222.53, is recommended for CFD 85-1. This increase is necessary to sustain the operating costs for the District and capital improvement expenditures. Capital improvements includes the $1,608,000 for the ADA improvements to the Jersey Fire Station 174 restrooms (1,340 sq ft) in coordination with projects at Fire Station 173 and

Page 1115 ends

Page 2 ends

2 9
2 2
175. The Fire District General Fund contribution of $4,165,704 offsets the budgeted capital improvements and operational costs.
An increase from $165.00 to $176.55, or 7.0%, but below the maximum allowable rate of $1,962.78, is recommended for CFD 88-1. This increase is necessary as operating costs have risen similarly to CFD 85-1. Several years ago, the Fire Board approved a rate reduction for CFD 88-1 to establish tax uniformity with CFD 85-1 for the property owners in both Districts. Consequently, during each budget process, the Fire District General Fund approves a fixed amount to support the District's operations and maintenance. For Fiscal Year 2025/26, the General Fund will contribute $2,818,014 to CFD 88-1 to support operations.

The table below summarizes the special tax levy (for a single-family residence) for each District for Fiscal Year 2025/26. The recommended rates comply with and are below the maximum rate allowed by the District.

District Current
Levy
Recommended
Levy Maximum Levy Notes
CFD 85-1 $165.00 $176.55 $222.53

7.0% increase to reflect
operating costs and capital
improvement project.

CFD 88-1 $63.46 to
$165.00
$67.90 to
$176.55
$751.37 to
$1,962.78

7.0% increase to reflect
operating costs.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The special tax revenues collected for each District are solely used for the services and administration costs related to that specific District. The District's Annual Status Report details the estimated expenses for administration, personnel services, and maintenance and operations within the Districts. As mentioned earlier, the Fire District General Fund's contribution to CFD 88-1 was approved and budgeted by the Fire Board during the budget approval process.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s core value of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future by complying with reporting requirements for special taxes to provide public services and administrative costs for the Districts.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution CFD 85-1
Attachment 2 – Annual Status Report - CFD 85-1
Attachment 3 – Resolution CFD 88-1
Attachment 4 – Annual Status Report - CFD 88-1

Page 1116 ends

Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 5
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE

ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS,the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), (a) initiated proceedings in 1985 to (i) form the Foothill Fire Protection District Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (“CFD No. 85-1”) and (ii) authorize the levy of special taxes within CFD No. 85-1; (b) held a public hearing regarding the foregoing and formed CFD No. 85-1; and (c) conducted an election on December 10, 1985, and more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition authorizing the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 85-1, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Act”); and WHEREAS,this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the annual levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said CFD No. 85-1 at the rate and apportion the special tax in the manner specified in the resolution adopted pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53318 of the Government Code), except that this Board of Directors may levy the special tax at a lower rate; and WHEREAS,this Board of Directors desires to levy a special tax in the CFD No. 85-1 for the Fiscal Year 2025/26

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: Levy of Special Tax. That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the CFD No. 85-1 is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A".

SECTION 2: Exempt Properties. That properties or entities of the State, Federal or other local governments shall be exempt from such special tax.

SECTION 3: Use of Special Tax. That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

A. The construction, acquisition, expansion and/or rehabilitation of public facilities, within or for the benefit of the CFD No. 85-1 generally described as follows:

Fire protection and suppression facilities and appurtenances, including equipment, real property and other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or longer.

B. The services to be provided within the CFD No. 85-1 are generally described as follows:

The performance by employees of functions, operations and maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection within the CFD No. 85-1.

C. The repayment of advances and loans. The special tax shall be used solely for the purposes specified above and for no other purpose.

Page 1117 ends

Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX - Page 2 of 5
SECTION 4: Annual Adjustment in Maximum Special Tax. Pursuant to authorization of the qualified electorate, this Board of Directors hereby declares that it shall annually adjust the maximum special tax based upon the lesser of:

A. changes in cost of living; or
B. changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code occurring within the CFD No. 85-1 in the immediately preceding fiscal year.

C. The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached referenced and incorporated Exhibit “B”
SECTION 5: Collection of Special Tax. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ______ day of ______________ 2025.

Page 1118 ends

Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX - Page 3 of 5
EXHIBIT "A"
ACTUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 IN
MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1

RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Structures Actual Annual Special Tax
Residential $176.55 per DU
Multi-Family Residential2 DU 1.75 ($176.55)
3 DU 2.25 ($176.55)
4 DU 2.65 ($176.55)
5 - 14 DU2.65 ($176.55) + {0.35 (TU-4) ($176.55)}
15 - 30 DU6.15 ($176.55) + {0.30(TU - 14) ($176.55)}
31 - 80 DU10.65 ($176.55) + {0.25(TU - 30) ($176.55)}
80 - up DU23.15 ($176.55) + {0.20(TU - 80) ($176.55)}
Commerical
Industrial
Note: DU = Dwelling Unit
TU = Total Units
SF = Building Square Foot
$176.55 per acre + 0.095 per SF
$176.55 per acre + 1.117 per SF

REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX
Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a $0.01 reduction in the special tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a $0.01 reduction (not cumulative) in special tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure.

Page 1119 ends

Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX - Page 4 of 5
EXHIBIT "B"
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 IN
MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1

RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Per Capita Cost ofFiscal Year Maximum Special Tax
Living Change 2024/25 Base Fiscal Year 2025/26

1.0253% $217.04 DU $222.53 DU
Maximum Annual Special Tax
Structures Fiscal Year 2025/26
Residential $222.53 per DU
Multi-Family Residential 2 DU 1.75 ($222.53)
3 DU 2.25 ($222.53)
4 DU 2.65 ($222.53)
5 - 14 DU2.65 ($222.53) + {0.35 (TU-4) ($222.53)}
15 - 30 DU6.15 ($222.53) + {0.30(TU - 14) ($222.53)}
31 - 80 DU10.65 ($222.53) + {0.25(TU - 30) ($222.53)}
80 - Up DU23.15 ($222.53) + {0.20(TU - 80) ($222.53)}
Commerical
Industrial
Note: DU = Dwelling Unit
TU = Total Units
SF = Building Square Footage
($222.53) per acre + (0.116) per SF
($222.53) per acre + (0.144) per SF

ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT
The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2025, and each July 1 st thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser.

REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX
Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure.

Page 1120 ends

Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX - Page 5 of 5

LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY
The Special Tax shall only be levied on developed property; provided that the Special Tax shall not be levied until a “Certification of Occupancy” or “Utility Release” has been issued by the appropriate governmental agencies.

Developed property is defined to be property:
Which is not owned by a public or governmental agency
Which is not vacant
Where a certificate of occupancy or utility release from the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the County of San Bernardino has been issued
Which has an existing building or structure on site
Which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities – these properties are exempt. Areas granted as easements to power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot and shall be exempt.

The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax.

For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services – Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District.

Page 1121 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

RANCHO CUCAMONGA

FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
(FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1122 ends

Community Facilities District No. 85-1 1 Fiscal Year 2025/26

BACKGROUND
On December 10, 1985, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (CFD No. 85-1) the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the “District”) voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in the cost of living and changes in population. CFD No. 85-1 is bounded generally on the north by the 210 Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda, on the south by 4th and on the west by Archibald.

The maximum special tax shall be annually adjusted for the lesser of (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended.

Fiscal Year 2025/26, the maximum tax rate which could be levied is adjusted per (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population. The maximum tax rate will increase from $217.04 to $222.53, or 2.53%. The actual assessment rate will increase from $165.00 to $176.55 per single-family residence, an increase of 7.0% as compared to Fiscal Year 2024/25.

Page 1123 ends

Community Facilities District No. 85-1 2 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
(FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT)
ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Structures Actual Annual Special Tax
Residential $176.55 per DU
Multi-Family Residential 2 DU 1.75 ($176.55)
3 DU 2.25 ($176.55)
4 DU 2.65 ($176.55)
5 - 14 DU2.65 ($176.55) + {0.35 (TU-4) ($176.55)}
15 - 30 DU6.15 ($176.55) + {0.30(TU - 14) ($176.55)}
31 - 80 DU10.65 ($176.55) + {0.25(TU - 30) ($176.55)}
80 - up DU23.15 ($176.55) + {0.20(TU - 80) ($176.55)}
Commerical
Industrial
Note: DU = Dwelling Unit
TU = Total Units
SF = Building Square Foot
$176.55 per acre + 0.095 per SF
$176.55 per acre + 1.117 per SF
Reduction
Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a $0.01 reduction in the special tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a $0.01 reduction (not cumulative) in special tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure.

Page 1124 ends

Community Facilities District No. 85-1 3 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1
(FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT)

PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies8,108,340$ Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 35,760
Subtotal - Taxes 8,144,100
CFD Annexations 500
Transfers In 4,165,704
Total Proposed Sources 12,310,304
Uses
Communications 558,500
Fire Suppression 12,012,440
Fire Station Operations and Maintenance 213,500
Capital Expenditures 1,608,000
Admin./General Overhead 329,070
Total Proposed Uses 14,721,510

Page 1125 ends

Community Facilities District No. 85-1 4 Fiscal Year 2025/26

Page 1126 ends

Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX – Page 1 of 4
ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE

ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS,the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This community facilities district shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "CFD No. 88-1"); and
WHEREAS,this legislative body, by Ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said CFD No. 88-1, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year and to adjust the maximum special tax authorization to be levied.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HEREBY RESOLVES:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the referenced CFD No. 88-1 is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced, and incorporated Exhibit "A".

SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the CFD No. 88-1.

SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority:

A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness, if any; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds, including sinking funds;
C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, including the administration of the special tax levy; and
D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose.

SECTION 5: That the maximum authorized special tax rates for all developed properties are hereby adjusted pursuant to Ordinance No. 17. The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth

Page 1127 ends

Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX – Page 2 of 4
in the attached, referenced, and incorporated Exhibit "B".

SECTION 6: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax.

SECTION 7: All monies above collected shall be paid into the CFD No. 88-1 funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund.

SECTION 8: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "public improvements," "special tax" or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A".

SECTION 9: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ________ day of ______________ 2025.

Page 1128 ends

Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX – Page 3 of 4
EXHIBIT "A"
SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1

RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

ACTUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE
TAXING CLASSIFICATIONFISCAL YEAR 2024/25FISCAL YEAR 2025/26

1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Residential Class I $165.00 $176.55
(more than 3,590 SF)
B. Residential Class II 126.92 135.81
(3,077 to 3,589 SF)
C. Residential Class III 101.54 108.65
(2,564 to 3,076 SF)
D. Residential Class IV 88.84 95.07
(2,308 to 2,563 SF)
E. Residential Class V 76.15 81.48
(2,051 to 2,307 SF)
F. Residential Class VI 69.81 74.69
(1,795 to 2,050 SF)
G. Residential Class VII 63.46 67.90
(less than 1,795 SF)
Commercial/Industrial253.85 per acre or 0.070271.62 per acre or 0.075 Property per sq.ft of building area,per sq.ft of building area, whichever is greater whichever is greater

2. APPROVED PROPERTY114.22 per lot or parcel122.22 per lot or parcel

3. VACANT PROPERTY 6.35 per acre 6.79 per acre
SF = Square Feet

Page 1129 ends

Resolution No. FD 2025-XXX – Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT "B"
SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1

RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE
TAXING CLASSIFICATIONFISCAL YEAR 2024/25FISCAL YEAR 2025/26

1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
A. Residential Class I $1,835.92 $1,962.78
(more than 3,590 SF)
B. Residential Class II 1,407.77 1,505.04
(3,077 to 3,589 SF)
C. Residential Class III 1,123.42 1,201.04
(2,564 to 3,076 SF)
D. Residential Class IV 984.66 1,052.70
(2,308 to 2,563 SF)
E. Residential Class V 842.63 900.85
(2,051 to 2,307 SF)
F. Residential Class VI 778.29 832.06
(1,795 to 2,050 SF)
G. Residential Class VII 702.81 751.37
(less than 1,795 SF)
Commercial/Industrial2,825.72 per acre or 0.228433,020.97 per acre or 0.24421 Property per sq.ft of building area,per sq.ft of building area, whichever is greater whichever is greater

2. APPROVED PROPERTY 200 per lot or parcel 200 per lot or parcel

3. VACANT PROPERTY 10.00 per acre 10.00 per acre
SF = Square Feet
NOTE: Escalation of the maximum special rate. Calculation formula Fiscal Year 2025/26.

Population CPI*
Change Change Factor

1.0044X 1.0644= 1.0691
*CPI - California Per Capita Personal Income

Page 1130 ends

ATTACHMENT 4

RANCHO CUCAMONGA

FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
(FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT)

ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
JULY 2025

Page 1131 ends

Community Facilities District No. 88-1 1 Fiscal Year 2025/26

BACKGROUND
On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (“CFD No. 88-1”) and authorized CFD No. 88-1 to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District) adopted an Ordinance authorizing the CFD No. 88-1, by Resolution, to annually levy a special tax in CFD No. 88-1 for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services. CFD No. 88-1 is located within the boundaries of Highland, Cherry, Day Creek Channel and the San Bernardino National Forest.

Fiscal Year 2025/26, the maximum tax rate which could be levied is adjusted per (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population. The maximum tax rate will increase from $1,835.92 to $1,962.78, or 6.91%. The actual assessment rate will increase from $165.00 to $176.55, an increase of 7.0% as compared to Fiscal Year 2024/25.

Page 1132 ends

Community Facilities District No. 88-1 2 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
(FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT)
ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2025/26

ACTUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE
TAXING CLASSIFICATIONFISCAL YEAR 2024/25FISCAL YEAR 2025/26

2. APPROVED PROPERTY114.22 per lot or parcel122.22 per lot or parcel

3. VACANT PROPERTY 6.35 per acre 6.79 per acre
SF = Square Feet

Page 1133 ends

Community Facilities District No. 88-1 3 Fiscal Year 2025/26
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1
(FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT)

PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
Fiscal Year
2025/26 Budget
Sources
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies557,300$ Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 6,220
Subtotal - Taxes 563,520
CFD Annexations 500
Transfers In 2,818,014
Total Proposed Sources 3,382,034
Uses
Communications 139,630
Fire Suppression 3,270,760
Fire Station Operations and Maintenance 63,700
Admin./General Overhead 130,110
Total Proposed Uses 3,604,200$

Page 1134 ends

Community Facilities District No. 88-1 4 Fiscal Year 2025/26

Page 1135 ends

DATE: July 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer
Sarine Hazarshahian, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure I Five- Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2024-2029. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-043) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amended Local Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy as requested by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure I funds.

BACKGROUND:

Measure I, the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction receiving revenues from the program annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (Plan) which outlines the specific projects and anticipated costs for which Measure I funds will be used.

In addition to adopting the Plan, the City is required by SBCTA Policy No. 40003 to annually acknowledge the requirement to meet the minimum General Fund Maintenance of Effort (MOE) level approved by both the City Council and SBCTA Board in February and March 2016 respectively. The required MOE level for Fiscal Year 2024/25 is $2,225,757. The original resolution (Resolution No. 2024-089) adopting the Plan covering fiscal years 2024-2029 was adopted August 21, 2024.

ANALYSIS:

In compliance with Measure I policies, staff has prepared the amended Plan (Attachment 1 – Exhibit A) for consideration by the City Council. Upon adoption of the resolution, the plan will be kept on file with SBCTA for informational purposes. The Plan includes pavement rehabilitation, traffic signal and striping improvements, and concrete repairs and improvements in Fiscal Year 2024/25 and aligns with the adopted Fiscal Year 2024/25 Budget. In addition to the Plan, the City is required to adopt the attached amended Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy (Attachment 1 – Exhibit B). This strategy is a narrative policy statement estimating the types of projects Local Measure I Funds are to be used for and the percentage of funds allocated for each type of project. Throughout Fiscal Year 2024/25, Measure I funds were used for construction of three (3) projects that were not previously listed in the Plan necessitating the proposed amendment. The amended Measure I CIP includes these three (3) new projects is included in the resolution included as Attachment 1.

Page 1136 ends

Page 2 ends

2 9
2 5
FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of this item will meet the SBTCA Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, MOE, and Expenditure Strategy requirements allowing the City to continue receiving Measure I funding.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring continued funding for the construction of high quality public improvements that promote a world class community.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2025-043

Page 1137 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORNIA ADOPTING THE

AMENDED MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FY2024/2025 THROUGH
FY2028/2029

WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in November 2004, authorizing the San Bernar dino County Transportation Authority to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and

WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management program s authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 04-01 of the Authority; and

WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for revenue from the Local Street Program to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan; and

WHEREAS, California Public Utilities C ode 190300 and Ordinance No. 04-01 require each local jurisdiction to maintain General Fund expenditures for transportation- related construction and maintenance activities at the required Maintenance of Effort base year level in each fiscal year of the adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, which for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is $2,225,757.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HERBY RESOLVES, t hat the Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, and the Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strat egy – Fiscal Year 2024/25 thru 2028/29 (Exhibit B) are hereby adopted.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16st day of July 2025.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 1138 ends

Resolution Number:

Resolution Approval Date:

Contact Person/Title:

Phone:

Email:
6/30/24 Carryover Balance $8,958,446.00
FY2024/25 Est. Revenue FY2025/26 Est. Revenue FY2026/27 Est. Revenue FY2027/28 Est. Revenue FY2028/29 Est. Revenue Total Est. Rev. $4,532,361 $4,633,495 $4,765,141 $4,894,858 $5,062,174 $23,888,029 Projects:

Local Street Rehabilitation - Citywide No No 0.0% 0.0% $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 Concrete contract Services - Maintenance Citywide No No 0.0% 0.0% $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 Major Traffic Signal Repairs No No 0.0% 0.0% $187,000 $187,000 $190,000 $190,000 $190,000 $190,000 $947,000 Signal Contract Services - Maintenance Citywide No No 0.0% 0.0% $1,023,000 $1,023,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,023,000 Striping Contract Services -Maintenance Citywide No No 0.0% 0.0% $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $750,000 6th Street Rehabilitation - Haven to Cleveland Yes Yes 0.0% 0.0% $881,000 $1,220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,220,000 Day Creek Channel Bike Trail No No 0.0% 0.0% $956,000 $146,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $146,000 Vineyard Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project No No 0.0% 0.0% $2,089,000 $98,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,000 Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project No No 0.0% 0.0% $3,233,000 $3,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,900

0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

0.0% 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,427,900 $3,940,000 $3,440,000 $3,440,000 $3,440,000 $20,687,900 Total Programming is currently 63% Total Estimated Programming: $20,687,900 Is Project in
City's
Non-motorized
Transportation
Plan?
(Yes/No)
Does Project
have an ATP
Component?
(Yes/No)
Is the Project on the City's
Nexus Study List?
(Public/DIF Share %)
Estimated Total
Project Cost
[email protected]
Projects Total:

Rancho Cucamonga
Current
Estimate
Current
Estimate TotalCurrent
Estimate
Current
Estimate
Current
Estimate
(Must not exceed 150% of Carryover Balance +
Total Estimated Revenue)
Jurisdiction:2025-XXX
7/16/2024
Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer
909-774-4058
Measure I Local Pass-through Program

FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Fiscal Years 2024/2025 thru 2028/2029

Page 1 of 1 ends

Page 1139 ends

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

MEASURE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

EXPENDITURE STRATEGY
Fiscal Year 2024/2025 thru 2028/2029

Each jurisdiction shall adopt a Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy as part of the annual Capital Improvement Plan adoption. The Expenditure Strategy is not intended to be a narrative descripti on of the projects listed in the Capital Improvement Plan. Instead, the Expenditure Stra tegy should provide the policy approach adopted by the Council for the ex penditure of Measure I funds. The jurisdictional Expenditure Strategy provides an opportunity to document circumstances or analyses which are not other wise apparent when reviewin g the Measure I Capital Improvement Plan.

You must include the strategy as part of the annual Capital Improvement Plan adopted by your governing body.

The Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expend iture Strategy for the expenditure of Measure I funds will use the City’s General Plan Circulation Element as its basis.

The City currently has an estimated carryover balance of approximately $8.9 million in the Measure I Local Street fund and anticipates approximately $4.5 million in new revenue for Fiscal Year 2024/25. In this next fiscal year, the City is planning to use approximately $6.2 million on local street capital projects and programs as follows:

Type of Improvement Estimated Cost FY
2024/25
Percentage
Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Repair
of Existing Roadways
$4.7 million 76%
Traffic Signal Improvements, Pavement
Striping, and Maintenance
$1.4 million 22%
Concrete Services (ADA, Repairs and
Sidewalks)
$100,000 2%

Over the Five-Year Plan it is anticipated that the Measure I funds will be allocated in the following manner:

Type of Improvement Estimated Cost
FY 2024/25 – 2028/29
Percentage
Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Repair
of Existing Roadways
$13.5 million 65%
Traffic Signal Improvements, Pavement
Striping, and Maintenance
$6.7 million 32%
Concrete Services (ADA, Repairs and
Sidewalks)
$500,000 3%

Page 1140 ends

DATE:July 16, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Shane Adams, Fire Marshal
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Confirming Unpaid Weed and Fire Hazard Abatement Fees and Authorizing a Special Assessment on Affected Parcels on the Next Tax Roll. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-062) (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council / Fire Board adopt a resolution confirming unpaid weed and fire hazard abatement fees for Spring 2024 and authorize a special assessment of those fees against the associated parcel on the next tax roll.

BACKGROUND:

In 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance 832, codified as Chapter 8.46 of the Municipal Code, which provides for removing seasonal grasses, weeds, and other fire hazards. This Ordinance authorizes the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting as the City's fire department, to perform weed and fire hazard abatement on behalf of the City.

In compliance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Fire District issued a Notice to Abate Weeds and Fire Hazards to owners of undeveloped parcels. This Notice included a completion date for the required abatement work. Owners receiving such notices were informed of their right to object and appeal the abatement order.

Parcels not abated by the compliance date were referred to an approved contractor authorized to perform the required abatement work by the order of the Fire District. The contractor submitted itemized invoices for the abatement cost for each parcel. Per the contract terms between the Fire District and the weed and fire abatement contractor, these invoices were paid with Fire District funds.

Using the contractor's itemized invoices, the Fire District prepared a report for the Finance Department detailing the expenses and rates for each parcel where the contractor performed abatement. The Finance Department then generated invoices based on this report. The Fire District issued Notices of Payment Due to the owners of parcels where abatement work was completed. These Notices included a detailed itemization of the charges and fees billed by the Fire District for the contractor's weed and fire hazard abatement services. When applicable, as

Page 1141 ends

Page 2 ends

2 9
3 7
allowed by Fire District Resolution FD 10-035, the Fire District also included a re-inspection and an administrative fee in the Notices of Payment Due.

The Notices served as invoices from the Fire District to the parcel owner of record, informing them of the payment terms and their right to appeal the invoice amount in full or in part, including instructions on filing an appeal. Exhibit A of the attached resolution lists by parcel and invoice number the total amount due for the work completed by the contractor and the unpaid Fire District fees, per the terms of the Notice of Payment Due. This resolution includes a total of 99 invoices.

ANALYSIS:

In accordance with the Municipal Code, the City Council must confirm by resolution the unpaid fees in order for the Fire District to make a formal request to the County Auditor for an unpaid weed and fire hazard invoice to be a special assessment on the parcel and included on the next tax roll. The resolution offered herewith serves that purpose. This legislative action is required each time special tax assessments are sent to the County Auditor. Staff brings this matter to the Council annually.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Weed and Fire Hazard Abatement Program is designed to be cost-neutral by recovering all charges and expenses associated with bringing non-compliant parcels into compliance with the City's weed and fire hazard abatement requirements. The resolution places the cost for the necessary work on the property owners whose choice or inaction led to the Fire District using budgeted funds. By utilizing all available means to recover the costs of abating the hazards, the Fire District ensures that the Weed and Fire Hazard Abatement Program will not financially impact the City or the Fire District.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

By ensuring that costs incurred by the Fire District for weed and fire hazard abatement services are paid by the property owners through cost-recovery efforts, the City Council reaffirms its long- standing commitment to fiscal responsibility. With the program being cost-neutral through cost- recovery, weed and fire hazard abatement has long-term sustainability. The wildfire risk and hazard reduction achieved by this program contribute to a high quality of life for all and enhance the safety and health of all community members.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2025-062, Unpaid Weed and Fire Hazard Abatement

Page 1142 ends

Resolution No. 2025-xxx Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-xxx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA CONFIRMING AN ITEMIZED WRITTEN REPORT

SHOWING THE ACTUAL COSTS OF WEED AND FIRE HAZARD

ABATEMENT FOR EACH SEPARATE PARCEL OF LAND AS
REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 39574,

PROVIDING THAT EACH SUCH COST OF ABATEMENT SHALL

CONSTITUTE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGAINST EACH LISTED

PARCEL OF LAND PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 39577, AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF SAID REPORT WITH THE COUNTY ASSESSOR.

WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 39502 authorizes the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) to adopt an ordinance providing for the removal of grass, weeds, rubbish and other materials that can be dangerous or injurious to neighboring property or the health and welfare of residents in the vicinity and make the cost of removal a lien on the property.

WHEREAS, The City adopted Ordinance 832, which is codified as Chapter 8.46 of the Municipal Code, providing for the removal of grass, weeds, etc. as allowed by the Government Code.

WHEREAS, Chapter 8.46 of the Municipal Code authorizes the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District), serving as the City’s fire department, to perform weed and fire hazard abatement on behalf of the City.

WHEREAS, The District provided notice to abate weeds and fire hazards to the owners of record of unimproved parcels and provided a completion date for the required abatement, all as required by law.

Owners receiving such notice were advised of their right to object to and appeal the order to abate.

WHEREAS, Parcels not abated by the completion date were referred to approved contractors to perform the required abatement work, by order of the District.

WHEREAS, The District was provided with itemized billings for the cost of abatement for each parcel by the abatement contractors. Using the itemized contractors’ billings, the District prepared an itemized, written report setting forth all abatement costs for each affected parcel, as required by California Government Code Section 39574 (written report). Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, the District billed the owners of record of the affected parcels listed in the written report for the cost of abatement, plus approved administrative fees as authorized by Government Code Section 39573 and District’s fee resolution (collectively, costs of abatement). Owners receiving such billings were advised of their right to object to and appeal the amount of the bill. None of the costs or fees set forth in the written report have been paid, nor are any the subject of a pending appeal.

WHEREAS, Attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by reference herein, are the written reports required by California Government Code Section 39574, setting forth a true and correct list of parcels with unpaid weed abatement costs and fees, and the amount of all costs of abatement for each parcel for calendar year 2023.

WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Page 1143 ends

Resolution No. 2025-xxx Page 2 of 3

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY FINDS AND RESOLVES:

1.All costs of abatement set forth in Exhibit A are reasonable and do not exceed the actual costs to the City or District in providing abatement services. Based thereon, the City Council hereby confirms all costs set forth in the written report, Exhibit A hereto.

2.All costs of abatement for each parcel of land listed in Exhibit A shall constitute a special assessment and lien against that parcel of land, as authorized by California Government Code Section 39577 and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 8.46.

3.The Fire Chief is hereby directed to deliver a certified copy of this Resolution, including Exhibit A hereto, to the San Bernardino County Auditor whereupon all costs of abatement set forth in Exhibit A shall constitute an assessment against each listed parcel as part of the County’s tax assessments, and shall be made part of the tax rolls, all in accordance with California Government Code Sections 39578, 39579, 39580, and 39583 and any other provision of law applicable thereto. Thereafter, a lien shall attach against each such parcel upon recordation of the order confirming the assessment in the office of the County Recorder.

Page 1144 ends

Resolution No. 2025-xxx Page 3 of 3
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025.

Page 1145 ends

A - 1

EXHIBIT A
List of Affected Parcels with Assessment Amount
Invoice
Number
Parcel
Number
Assessment
Amount
CINV-000074 20044134 $ 891.00
CINV-000075 20044151 $ 606.00
CINV-000076 20118228 $ 1,295.00
CINV-000077 20204141 $ 804.25
CINV-000078 20204162 $ 1,126.00
CINV-000079 20208233 $ 576.75
CINV-000080 20213161 $ 547.50
CINV-000081 20213162 $ 1,213.75
CINV-000082 20216109 $ 779.50
CINV-000083 20216143 $ 833.50
CINV-000085 20246162 $ 378.50
CINV-000090 20704429 $ 547.50
CINV-000091 20711301 $ 547.50
CINV-000092 20711302 $ 547.50
CINV-000093 20711303 $ 547.50
CINV-000094 20711304 $ 547.50
CINV-000095 20711305 $ 547.50
CINV-000096 20711306 $ 547.50
CINV-000097 20711307 $ 547.50
CINV-000098 20711308 $ 547.50
CINV-000099 20726205 $ 606.00
CINV-000107 20764105 $ 1,568.00
CINV-000108 20816240 $ 664.50
CINV-000109 20821682 $ 736.00
CINV-000110 20829101 $ 606.00
CINV-000111 20829107 $ 1,743.50
CINV-000112 20833108 $ 576.75
CINV-000113 20833117 $ 1,002.50
CINV-000114 20835302 $ 1,259.25
CINV-000115 20835318 $ 892.00
CINV-000116 20835508 $ 892.00
CINV-000117 20835509 $ 892.00
CINV-000118 20835524 $ 1,236.50
CINV-000119 20837713 $ 554.00
CINV-000120 20901313 $ 576.75
CINV-000121 20901344 $ 576.75
CINV-000122 20903267 $ 833.50
CINV-000123 20906211 $ 1,035.00
CINV-000124 20907116 $ 1,750.00
CINV-000125 20910225 $ 554.00
CINV-000126 20912226 $ 973.25

Page 1146 ends

A - 2
CINV-000127 20912227 $ 973.25
CINV-000128 20913102 $ 2,601.50
CINV-000129 20917106 $ 1,035.00
CINV-000130 20925105 $ 804.25
CINV-000131 20941132 $ 1,574.50
CINV-000132 20941135 $ 2,608.00
CINV-000133 21007216 $ 547.50
CINV-000134 21008141 $ 3,859.25
CINV-000135 21008142 $ 3,859.25
CINV-000136 21037103 $ 804.25
CINV-000137 21037107 $ 1,259.25
CINV-000138 22511105 $ 576.75
CINV-000139 22511107 $ 1,912.50
CINV-000140 22511108 $ 1,230.00
CINV-000141 22511109 $ 1,516.00
CINV-000142 22512283 $ 671.00
CINV-000143 22512305 $ 1,002.50
CINV-000144 22512309 $ 1,347.00
CINV-000145 22515217 $ 2,283.00
CINV-000146 22518173 $ 1,347.00
CINV-000147 22519136 $ 1,743.50
CINV-000148 22519139 $ 664.50
CINV-000149 22610203 $ 576.75
CINV-000150 22610204 $ 576.75
CINV-000151 22705131 $ 1,574.50
CINV-000152 22706157 $ 1,574.50
CINV-000153 22706173 $ 1,457.50
CINV-000154 22706174 $ 1,516.00
CINV-000155 22749212 $ 606.00
CINV-000156 22749213 $ 606.00
CINV-000158 22914104 $ 1,061.00
CINV-000159 22926370 $ 1,002.50
CINV-000160 22928396 $ 4,363.00
CINV-000161 22934116 $ 547.50
CINV-000162 106109102 $ 664.50
CINV-000163 106117220 $ 576.75
CINV-000164 106123132 $ 576.75
CINV-000165 106123133 $ 576.75
CINV-000166 106125121 $ 856.25
CINV-000167 106138124 $ 606.00
CINV-000168 106138125 $ 547.50
CINV-000169 106138126 $ 547.50
CINV-000170 106138127 $ 547.50
CINV-000171 106138128 $ 547.50
CINV-000172 106139129 $ 606.00
CINV-000173 106138130 $ 664.50
CINV-000174 106138131 $ 606.00

Page 1147 ends

A - 3
CINV-000175 106179103 $ 1,750.00
CINV-000176 106181129 $ 635.25
CINV-000177 106227101 $ 2,335.00
CINV-000178 107426133 $ 576.75
CINV-000179 107428110 $ 892.00
CINV-000180 107431108 $ 1,195.75
CINV-000181 107436110 $ 562.13
CINV-000182 107455122 $ 1,195.75
CINV-000183 108958107 $ 1,035.00
CINV-000184 109041101 $ 664.50
CINV-000185 110019139 $ 1,031.75

Page 1148 ends

DATE:July 16, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer
SUBJECT: Conduct an Administrative Hearing for the Almond Street Improvement Project (Project), Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. in the Amount of $252,005, Plus 10% Contingency for Design and Construction Support Services for the Project, and Authorize the Purchase of Environmental Mitigation Credits in the Amount up to $200,000 from Soquel Mitigation Bank. This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15168 – Program Environmental Impact Report, Section 15301– Existing Facilities, and Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council and Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District:

1. Conduct an administrative hearing on the Almond Street Improvement Project (Project) to discuss the purpose of the project, the preliminary design concept, key design features, and community engagement efforts, and to receive public comment;

2. Enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) in the amount of $252,005, for design and construction support services for the Project;

3. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency for the contract, in the amount of $25,200; and

4. Authorize the purchase of environmental mitigation credits in the amount up to $200,000 from Soquel Mitigation Bank.

BACKGROUND:

The Almond Street Improvement Project aims to improve circulation and accessibility for emergency responders in the northwest portion of the city by connecting Almond Street from Carnelian Street to Via Verde Street. The need for the Almond Street connection was identified

Page 1149 ends

Page 2 ends

2 9
0 2
in the City’s very first General Plan, adopted in 1981, and has been identified in all subsequent General Plans.

In 2008, Cal Fire designated this area of the City as a High Fire Severity Zone and in 2021 the city adopted the Community Wildfire Protection Plan and the Evacuation Assessment. These plans assess different wildfire scenarios and plan evacuation routes in the event of a wildfire. With these updates, there was a renewed emphasis on prioritizing the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Areas which include the communities adjacent to the foothills which are most exposed to wildfire risks. These plans demonstrate a strong need for an additional ingress/egress point to the northwest portion of the city. The only ingress/egress point for this neighborhood is via Sapphire Street, meaning that during emergencies, both the public and emergency responders rely on the same route, creating potential safety challenges during evacuations. Additionally, a new connection could result in improved emergency response times for neighborhoods north of Almond Street.

The right of way required to complete the Project was dedicated in 1977. As this was before the City’s incorporation, the County of San Bernardino accepted this offer of dedication on behalf of the City and the ownership of this right of way was transferred from the County to the City upon incorporation.

Extensive community engagement has been conducted for this Project. The initial public meeting, which was held on November 13, 2024, at Floyd M. Stork Elementary School, was attended by over 30 residents and property owners. At this meeting, City Engineering Staff and the Fire District presented the background and need for the Project. Following the presentation, attendees participated in an interactive activity, sharing their ideas and concerns regarding the proposed Project. Key areas of community concerns were traffic impacts, safety, equestrian access, insurance implications, property rights, environmental impacts, and future growth/development in the area. Ideas and priorities shared by participants to be considered for the Project included providing emergency vehicle access only, trail access, no on-street parking, preserving views and dark skies, increased police presence, and exploring alternative routes.

Based on this feedback, City staff conducted further investigations to confirm previous right of way dedications and determine potential alternative project options. Staff arrived at two important conclusions related to alternative options:
The option for limiting access on Almond Street to emergency vehicles only is not possible due to the additional response times from the introduction of a gate and a potential for malfunction, which could cause increased delay,

It was also determined that the suggested route along Turquoise Avenue instead of Almond Street is not viable because Turquoise Avenue is surrounded by dense vegetation which is heavily flammable. This route is also in the direction of the likely path that a fire would take, given the topography of the foothills in the area.

The second community meeting was held on April 23, 2025. The meeting was held at Fire Station #177 and approximately 40 residents and property owners participated in the interactive event which included both an open house and a hands-on design activity. During the open house, attendees engaged with City staff and first responders at various informational stations focused on addressing the questions and concerns that were raised at the first community meeting. The workshop then transitioned into a collaborative tabletop activity, where participants provided input on design features such as equestrian trails, sidewalks, parking, lighting, landscaping and traffic

Page 1150 ends

Page 3 ends

2 9
0 2
calming elements.

ANALYSIS:

Feedback from project surveys as well as both community meetings, including the tabletop activity completed at the community meeting held on April 23, 2025, was used by Engineering Staff to develop a preliminary concept to visualize proposed Project improvements. The preliminary concept includes the following elements:
A pedestrian and equestrian trail along the south side of Almond Street; No on-street parking;
Low-level street lighting to support safety and deter crime by creating natural surveillance and a well-lit area which is a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategy; and
Native landscaping and a rural aesthetic along the north side of Almond Street.

If approved by the Council, Engineering staff will work with the selected consultant over the coming months to begin and finalize the engineering and design of the preliminary concept.

Factors that will need further evaluation during the design phase include traffic calming elements to address community concerns, utility coordination, and access to adjacent properties.

Engineering staff requested proposals from engineering firms on the City On-Call Civil and Traffic consultant list for the design and construction support services contract in May 2025. All consultants on the City On-Call are prequalified. Kimley-Horn submitted a comprehensive proposal that clearly demonstrated a strong understanding of the Project scope and challenges.

Given the sensitive nature of this Project and the environmental factors that need to be considered, Staff recommends awarding the Professional Services Agreement to Kimley-Horn.

Environmental Review:

The Project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15168 – Program Environmental Impact Report, Section 15301– Existing Facilities, and Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. A Notice of Exemption was filed with the County of San Bernardino on September 6, 2024.

The Categorial Exemption identified that permits from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) are required due to Project impacts on the natural drainage area. Due to these impacts, the City is required to purchase environmental mitigation credits to offset the impact of the Project.

City staff explored partnering with both Inland Empire Resource Conservation District (IERCD) and Soquel Canyon, who own and manage land mitigation banks to offset the impacts of projects such as the Almond Street Project. IERCD has credits available for purchase at a lower cost which meet the mitigation requirements however, the City would be responsible for conserving the land and restoring it in the event of a natural disaster. Conversely, the Soquel Canyon Land Veritas Mitigation Bank purchases and protects these lands in perpetuity meaning the City would not be responsible for any restoration costs in the future.

For these reasons, City staff recommend purchasing credits from the Soquel Canyon Land Veritas Mitigation Bank. The cost for the environmental migration credits is estimated to be up to

Page 1151 ends

Page 4 ends

2 9
0 2
$200,000. City staff will work with Soquel Mitigation Bank to purchase the credits and finalize the required permits from RWQCB and CDFW before construction.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Anticipated design and construction support services costs and environmental mitigation credits are estimated to be as follows:

Expenditure Category Amount
Design and Construction Support Services Contract $252,005 Contract Contingency (10%) $25,200
Environmental Mitigation Credits $200,000
Estimated Contract Costs $477,205
A total of $1.85 million is budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget for this project consisting of funds from the Infrastructure Fund (Fund 198). Costs to date for the Project include environmental, public outreach, and survey services totaling $102,940. The remaining budget available for the Project is $1,850,000 as outlined here:

Account No. Funding Source Amount
F198 CC303 SC7004
PID2101 Infrastructure Fund (198) $1,850,000
Total Project Funding $1,850,000
After the design and construction support services contract, contingency, and environmental mitigation credits, $1,372,795 will remain in the Project account to cover the cost of construction and construction support. It is anticipated that this will be sufficient to cover the cost of construction and construction support however, this will not be known until bids are received on the Project. If additional funding is required to cover the remaining Project costs, an appropriation will be requested at that time.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements. This item addresses the City Council’s core value of actively seeking and respectfully considering all public input.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Preliminary Design Concept Rendering

Page 1152 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Almond Street Improvement Project

NOT TO SCALE

Project Location

Page 1153 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Preliminary Design Concept Rendering

NOT TO SCALE

Page 1154 ends

DATE: July 16, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Maritza Martinez, Public Works Services Director Daniel Akers. Public Works Services Deputy Director
Fily Reyes, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Reject Bids Received for the VG6 and VG7 Trail Lighting Project and Consideration for a Resolution Declaring the Project Can Be Performed More Economically by City Staff. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-042) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council reject bids received for the VG6 and VG7 Trail Lighting Projects and approve Resolution No. 2025-042, declaring the VG6 & VG7 Trail Lighting Project can be performed more economically by City staff.

BACKGROUND:

The Notice Inviting Bids for the VG6 & VG7 Trail Lighting Project was posted on May 27, 2025.

The Project bids were opened on June 10, 2025, and the City received one response from California Professional Engineering, Inc. The proposed project will remove non-operable lighting in the VG7 & VG6 walking trail area and replace with new LED lighting. The bid received for VG7 (Base Bid) was $399,676 and the bid received for VG6 (Additive Bid) was $402,987.50.

Combined the total to complete these VG6 and VG7 based on the single responsive bid received is $802,663.50. Staff has reviewed the bid received and identified available funding for the VG6 & VG7 areas cannot allow for award of this project based on bids received.

The bid received amounts are as follows:

Bids:

Base Bid -VG7 $399,676.00
Additive Bid - VG6 $402,987.50
Total $802,663.50
ANALYSIS:

The Public Works team has the expertise inhouse to deliver this project and can do so more economically than the cost identified ($802,663.50) through the formal bid process. The Public Contracts Code allows the city to utilize Cost Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual Code 22038 to complete the project by force account labor (city staff). Staff has reviewed the project plans and specifications and can deliver this project more economically than identified through the formal bid process. Through our in-house divisions and crews, we can complete this project within the original budget of $387,060.

Page 1155 ends

Page 2 ends

2 9
0 3
Staff recommends 1) authorization to reject the bid received and 2) approval of the attached resolution authorizing City forces to perform the VG6 and VG7 Trail Lighting Projects by a four- fifths vote of City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding for the VG6 & VG7 Trail Lighting Projects is available and appropriated in the FY 2025/2026 budget in the amount of $387,060.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

The VG6 and VG7 Trail Lighting Project is a project that will promote a safe and healthy community by replacing the non-operable lighting in the VG7 & VG6 walking trail area and replace with new LED lighting which will enhance appearance and security for users of the walkways.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Bid Summary
Attachment 3 – Resolution

Page 1156 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
PROJECT# PW 2025-116
VG-6 & VG-7 TRAIL LIGHTING PROJECT

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

Project Site

Page 1157 ends

item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Cost
1 Mobilization/ Demobilization 1 LS $10,776.00 $10,776.00 2 Traffic Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
3 Utility Search/ Utility Potholes 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 4 Construction notification sign per
standard city drawing 401-C 1 EA $2,000.00 $2,000.00
5 Removal and salvage of existing light
poles and luminaires. Deliver light
poles and luminaires to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Yard located at
8794 Lion Street 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00
6 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00
7 Remove and dispose reinforced
concrete pole foundations - backfill
the excavated holes 14 EA $1,000.00 $14,000.00
8 Remove existing electrical conduits,
the conductors within the conduits,
and pull boxes which are in proximity
of the existing light poles, as
necessary, to avoid conflict with the
proposed light pole foundations and
electrical conduits. Dispose the
removed conduits, conductors, and
pull boxes. 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00
9 Construct light pole pedestal/
foundation per details shown on
project drawings. Includes the
electrical conduits and conductors
within the pole pedestal and
foundation, and all incidentals. 16 EA $2,500.00 $40,000.00 10 Construct light pole and luminaire, as
called out on the project drawings.

Includes the electrical conduits and
conductors within the light poles, and
all incidentals. 16 EA $3,750.00 $60,000.00
11 Construct electrical conduits and
conductors as called out on project
drawings. Includes excavations and
backfills, and all incidentals. 1900 LF $99.00 $188,100.00 12 Construct Jensen HN1324 handhole
per City of Rancho Cucamonga
Standard Plan 413. 1 EA $800.00 $800.00
13 Trench Excavation (Roadway) per City
Standard 120, 4-foot wide 350 SF $50.00 $17,500.00
14 Remove and Replace 6 inch thick
concrete sidewalk 800 SF $50.00 $40,000.00
15 Restore the disturbed and damaged
irrigation and landscaping to pre-
construction condition 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00
BASE BID TOTAL = $399,676.00
June, 10, 2025 BID OPENING SUMMARY
VG6 and VG7 Trial Lighting Project
VG7 - BASE BID:

California Professional
Engineering, Inc.

Apparent Low Bidder
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1158 ends

VG6 - ADDITIVE BID 1
item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Cost
1 Mobilization/Demobilization 1 LS $11,737.50 $11,737.50 2 Traffic Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
3 Utility Search/ Utility Pothole 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 4 Construction notification sign per
standard city drawing 401-C 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00
5 Removal and salvage of existing light
poles and luminaires. Deliver light
poles and luminaires to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Yard located at
8794 Lion Street 1 LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00
6 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00
7 Remove and dispose reinforced
concrete pole foundations - backfill
the excavated holes 17 EA $1,000.00 $17,000.00
8 Remove existing electrical conduits,
the conductors within the conduits,
and pull boxes which are in proximity
of the existing light poles, as
necessary, to avoid conflict with the
proposed light pole foundations and
electrical conduits. Dispose the
removed conduits, conductors, and
pull boxes. 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00
9 Construct light pole
pedestal/foundation per details
shown on project drawings. Includes
the electrical conduits and conductors
within the pole pedestal and
foundation, and all incidentals. 18 EA $2,500.00 $45,000.00 10 Construct light pole and luminaire, as
called out on the project drawings.

Includes the electrical conduits and
conductors within the light poles, and
all incidentals. 18 EA $3,750.00 $67,500.00
11 Construct electrical conduits and
conductors as called out on project
drawings. Includes excavations and
backfills, and all incidentals. 1950 LF $99.00 $193,050.00 12 Construct Jensen HN1324 handhole
per City of Rancho Cucamonga
Standard Plan 413. 4 EA $800.00 $3,200.00
13 Remove and Replace 6 inch thick
concrete sidewalk 700 SF $50.00 $35,000.00
14 Restore the disturbed and damaged
irrigation and landscaping to pre-
construction condition 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00
ADDITIVE BID TOTAL = $402,987.50
BASE BID+ADDITIVE BID TOTAL = $802,663.50
California Professional
Engineering, Inc.

Page 1159 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING ALL BIDS,
DECLARING THAT THE VG6 AND VG7 TRAIL LIGHTING

PROJECT CAN BE PERFORMED MORE ECONOMICALLY BY

CITY EMPLOYEES, AND APPROVING A CEQA EXEMPTION

DETERMINATION
WHEREAS, on or about May 27, 2025, the City issued its notice inviting bids for the VG6 and VG7 Trail Lighting Project (“Project”).

WHEREAS, on or before June 10,2025, bids were received to construct the Project. The amount bid by the apparent low bidder was
$ 399,676.00, and $ 802,663.50 if the bid alternate additive option is added; and WHEREAS, Public Contract Code Sec. 22038(a) provides that, following notice to the apparent low bidder on a public works project of the agency’s intent to reject their bid, and reevaluation of the project’s cost estimates, the public agency may reject all bids and, by adoption of a resolution by four-fifths vote, declare that the project can be more economically performed by employees of the agency; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has (i) provided the required notice to the apparent low bidder for the Project; (ii) reevaluated the cost estimates for the Project; and (iii) otherwise complied with the requirements of Public Contract Code Sec. 22038(a).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY FINDS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1.The facts set forth in the Recitals above are true and correct and are made a part of this Resolution.

Section 2.All bids received to construct the Project are hereby rejected. Based on the facts set forth in the Recitals, including the documents referenced therein, the City Council hereby declares that the Project can be more economically performed by City employees without further compliance with Public Contract Code Sections 22000 through 22045.

Section 3. The City Public Works Director is hereby directed to take any and all actions necessary, consistent with local, State, and federal law, to cause the Project, including the bid alternate additive option, to be constructed and completed using City employees, at a cost not to exceed $ $387,060. No revision of the Project’s plans and specifications shall be made, unless made in compliance with Public Contract Code Section 20102.

Section 4. This Resolution has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) (“CEQA”). The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that completion of the Project, as previously approved, has no likelihood of causing a significant negative effect on the environment. Based on the foregoing, the City Council determines that this Resolution is exempt from the application of CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Section 5.The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

Page 1160 ends

Resolution No. 2025-XXX - Page 2 of 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ___ day of ______, 2025. _____________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
I, KIM SEVY, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the ____ day of ________, 2025.

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ATTEST:
__________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk

Page 1161 ends

Page 1 of 3 ends

2 9
0 6
DATE:July 16, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Lori Price, Community Improvement Supervisor SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Consideration of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1043, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Extending for an Additional 12 months a Moratorium on the Granting of Any Zoning Approval, Home Occupation Permit, or other Permit, License, or Land Use Entitlement for Using Real Properties Zoned and/or Developed for Residential Use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Home Experience Sharing. (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1043) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends that the City Council adopt by a four-fifths (4/5) vote Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1043, establishing and/or extending the current moratorium prohibiting Home Experience Sharing Uses for an additional twelve (12) months.

BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to State law, Government Code Section 65858, a city may enact an interim Zoning Ordinance on an urgency basis to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by prohibiting any use(s) that may be in conflict with a contemplated change to a city's General Plan, Specific Plan, zoning requirements, or any such change that a city is intending to study within a reasonable period of time.

On September 17, 2024, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030, establishing a moratorium on the granting of any zoning approval, home occupation permit, or other permit, license, or land use entitlement for using real properties zoned and/or developed for residential use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for home experience sharing. Per State law, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030 was effective for a period of 45 days from the date of adoption – which was scheduled to expire on November 1, 2024.

On October 15, 2024, after having issued a written report on October 2, 2024, describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition(s) which led to the adoption of the moratorium, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1032, extending the moratorium for an additional ten (10) months, fifteen (15) days, in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 65858(a).

Page 1162 ends

Page 2 of 3 ends

2 9
0 6
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(a), after an initial extension of an urgency ordinance for ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days, the City Council may extend the urgency ordinance for an additional twelve (12) months by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council after a duly-noticed public hearing. Additionally, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d), the City Council is also required to issue a written report at least ten (10) days prior to the expiration of the urgency ordinance or any extension thereof, describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition(s) which led to the adoption of the Urgency Ordinance.

ANALYSIS:

Over the past several years, there has been a surge in popularity in the rental of recreational amenities (e.g., swimming pools; playgrounds; barbeques and grills; pickleball courts, tennis courts, and other sports areas; and other exterior portions of real properties) separate and apart from the rental of the residential dwelling – a use that is commonly known as “Home Experience Sharing”.

While the rental of recreational amenities as part of a Home Experience Sharing can provide supplemental income to families within our community and provide recreational opportunities for persons without these amenities, there are a number of adverse impacts upon residential neighborhoods – including, but not limited to, increased noise, disorderly conduct, and lack of adequate off-street parking for residents, that the City’s current laws would not adequately address. Such impacts would, in turn, result in potential conflicts between Home Sharing Experience guests and neighbors – and an increased expenditure of City resources in responding to complaints. Additionally, Home Experience Sharing raises health and safety concerns as there are currently insufficient and/or no regulations pertaining to minimum standards for maintenance of the recreational amenities, sanitation facilities (especially since the recreational facilities are not rented in conjunction with a residential building), insurance coverage to cover accidents or injuries suffered by these social guests.

Properties with amenities like pools, batting cages, putting greens, and playgrounds face significant challenges in maintaining safety and proper upkeep. Moreover, increased standards may be appropriate given the commercial use of such recreational features – including supplemental sanitation and insurance requirements. While City inspections may be conducted at the initial installation of these amenities at residential properties, further inspections may be warranted to safeguard the ongoing health, safety, and welfare of persons (including individuals, children, and families) who may lease/rent these amenities.

The utilization of Home Experience Sharing by large groups of persons and the increase in the frequency of such events lead to increased traffic, noise, and other adverse effects within residential communities – impacting the quality of life for residents and straining community resources.

As set forth in the written report issued by the City Council on June 18, 2025, the City has already undertaken efforts to study the benefits and detriments of Home Experience Sharing in order to determine whether such a use would be appropriate in residential areas of the City – and, if so, what types of regulations and standards would be proper and/or necessary upon the operation of Home Experience Sharing to mitigate any adverse impacts upon our residential communities.

Page 1163 ends

Page 3 of 3 ends

2 9
0 6
Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65853 through 65857, a zoning ordinance (including an amendment to the City’s Development Code) that imposes, removes, or modifies a regulation of the use of buildings, structures, or lands cannot be submitted to the City Council for consideration until after it has been considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing and the Planning Commission has issued and submitted a recommendation to the City Council.

After a thorough evaluation of the benefits and adverse impacts — including a review of how similar programs have been assessed and found impractical in other cities — Staff intends to present an Ordinance to the Planning Commission and City Council to explicitly prohibit Home Experience Sharing within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Due to the pending expiration of the moratorium (currently scheduled for September 17, 2025), and in order to provide sufficient time for Staff to prepare a permanent ordinance prohibiting Home Experience Sharing for consideration by both the Planning Commission and the City Council, an extension of the moratorium initially imposed by Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030 (and subsequently extended by Interim Urgency Ordinance 1032) is immediately necessary and appropriate to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

Implementing the interim urgency ordinance aligns with several City Council core values, including:
Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all residents. Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community.
Embracing and preparing for future developments.
Cooperating respectfully with all stakeholders.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – City Council Staff Report dated September 17, 2024 Attachment 2 – City Council Staff Report dated October 2, 2024 Attachment 3 – City Council Staff Report dated June 18, 2025 Attachment 4 – Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1043

Page 1164 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

DATE:September 17, 2024
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Carrie Rios, Community Improvement Manager SUBJECT: Discussion and Action to Introduce, Waive Reading of, and Adopt by a Four-fifths Vote, Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030, to be Read by Title Only, and Waive Further Reading, Prohibiting Home Experience Sharing Uses, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, and Adopting Finding Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in Connection Therewith. (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1030) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends the City Council adopt Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030, prohibiting Home Experience Sharing Uses for a period of 45 days.

BACKGROUND:

Home experience sharing has surged in popularity in the last two years, offering travelers as well as event planners unique lodging options many of which include amenities such as pools, putting greens, playgrounds, and spacious yards. While these features enhance guest experiences and benefit the local economy, the rapid growth has raised several concerns, including safety, maintenance, and impacts on local neighborhoods as quiet, single-family residences are transformed into part-time event spaces.

Recent observations in Rancho Cucamonga have highlighted problems such as inadequate maintenance of amenities, increased noise and traffic, and disturbances and confrontations in residential areas from the use of these spaces. These issues require immediate attention to protect community well-being and ensure effective management of these properties that does not impact either the guest experience or immediate neighbors.

Under Government Code Section 65858, cities can adopt a temporary ordinance to address issues related to new uses while exploring long-term solutions. This ordinance can remain in effect for up to 45 days and may be extended for up to 10 months and 15 days, with a possible additional one-year extension.

ANALYSIS:

Properties with amenities like pools, putting greens, and playgrounds face significant challenges in maintaining safety and proper upkeep. Pools need rigorous management to prevent accidents and meet health standards, while playgrounds must be regularly inspected to ensure they are safe for children. Putting greens or driving ranges used occasionally may become a nuisance when used regularly by large groups. Inconsistent oversight can lead to safety hazards and lower guest satisfaction.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 1165 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

2 1
4 4
The influx of home experience sharing properties has also led to increased noise, traffic, and disruptions in some neighborhoods, impacting the quality of life for residents and straining community resources. Events taking place all week long, on holidays, late into the evening, and early in the day all have significant neighborhood impacts when the events become regular occurrences. Addressing these impacts is crucial for maintaining neighborhood harmony and ensuring that the benefits of home experience sharing do not come at the expense of community well-being.

The City is committed to embracing the benefits of home experience sharing but recognizes the need for more time to research and develop regulations that balance both sides. Current regulations are insufficient for managing the diverse range of amenities being offered. A temporary moratorium will allow the City to develop comprehensive and fair regulations that address safety, maintenance, and community integration, ensuring that home experience sharing can coexist with the needs of local residents.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

Implementing the interim urgency ordinance aligns with several City Council core values, including, providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all residents, promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community, embracing and preparing for future developments, and cooperating respectfully with all stakeholders.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Interim Urgency Ordinance

Page 1166 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

2 5
7 0
DATE:October 2, 2024
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Carrie Rios, Community Improvement Manager SUBJECT: Consideration to Receive and File a Report in Conformance with California Government Code Section 65858(D) On Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030, A 45-Day Moratorium on Granting of Any Zoning Approval, Home Occupation Permit, or Other Permit, License, or Land Use Entitlement for Using Real Properties Zoned and/or Developed For Residential Use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Home Experience Sharing. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends that the City Council, in conformance with California Government Code Section 65858, issue the attached report on the measures taken by staff since September 17, 2024, to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030, establishing a Moratorium on the granting of any Zoning Approval, Home Occupation Permit, or other Permit, License, or Land Use Entitlement for using Real Properties Zoned and/or developed for residential use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Home Experience Sharing.

BACKGROUND:

ANALYSIS:

Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code provides that ten (10) days prior to the expiration of an interim urgency ordinance, the legislative body shall issue a written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions that led to the adoption of the urgency interim ordinance. The following specific activities have been and/or are currently being undertaken:
❖Studying issues associated with Home Experience Sharing (including, but not limited to, sanitation, noise, and parking) to determine the appropriate locational and developmental standards. Meeting with other City Departments/Divisions and other governmental ATTACHMENT 2

Page 1167 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

2 5
7 0
agencies that may need to inspect and/or regulate properties that conduct Home Sharing Experiences in order to safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of the Home Sharing Experience hosts and guests, as well as that of the general public. ❖Studying adopted State regulations pertaining “public swimming pools” and the suitability of applying said standards to Home Sharing Experiences that include swimming pools. ❖Evaluating current City noise standards and regulations, and their suitability and applicability to Home Sharing Experiences.
❖Studying adopted development standards from other California cities to determine “best practice” standards that might be applicable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ❖Drafting a permanent ordinance for consideration by the Planning Commission to permit the use of real properties zoned and/or developed for residential use for Home Sharing Experiences
❖Drafting a permanent ordinance for consideration by the City Council to regulate Home Sharing Experiences to eliminate and/or diminish the adverse impacts upon the health, safety, and welfare of Home Sharing Experience hosts and guests, as well as that of the general public
The above reflect the actions that have been taken during the very limited time since the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030, as well as the actions that are still ongoing, in an effort to alleviate the conditions that led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance 1030.

Staff will also be seeking an extension of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030 to allow for completion of the above-referenced actions – including the preparation of a permanent ordinance(s) permitting and regulating Home Sharing Experiences for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. An opportunity for full public comment on the extension of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030 will be provided at the City Council’s Public Hearing to be held on October 15, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

Not applicable.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030

Page 1168 ends

Page 1 of 3 ends

2 8
8 4
DATE: June 18, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Matthew Burris, Deputy City Manager- Community Development Zack Neighbors, Building and Safety Services Director
Lori Price, Community Improvement Supervisor
SUBJECT: Consideration to Receive and File a Report in Conformance with California Government Code Section 65858( D) on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Urgency Ordinances Nos. 1030 and 1032, a Moratorium on the Granting of Any Zoning Approval, Home Occupation Permit, or Other Permit, License, or Land Use Entitlement for Using Real Properties Zoned and/ or Developed for Residential Use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Home Experience Sharing. ( CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council, in conformance with California Government Code Section 65858, receive and file this written report on the measures taken by staff since September 17, 2024, to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinances nos. 1030 and 1032, establishing a Moratorium on the granting of any Zoning Approval, Home Occupation Permit, or other Permit, License, or Land Use Entitlement for using real properties zoned and/ or developed for residential use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Home Experience Sharing.

BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65898, a city may enact an interim Zoning Ordinance on an urgency basis to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by prohibiting any use( s) that may conflict with a contemplated change to a city’s General Plan, Specific Plan, zoning requirements, or any such change that a city is intending to study within a reasonable period.

At the regular meeting on September 17, 2024, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030, establishing a moratorium on the granting of any zoning approval, home occupation permit, or other permit, license, or land use entitlement for using real properties zoned and/ or developed for residential use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Home Experience Sharing – which was defined to mean the rental or lease of a recreational amenity or recreational amenities on residential properties ( including, but not limited to, swimming pools, barbeques, grills, sports courts, and other portions of residentially zoned and/ or developed properties that are designed or used for recreational activities), separate from or otherwise not in conjunction with the rental of a residential dwelling unit. The moratorium was enacted in order to provide Staff sufficient time to evaluate the adverse impacts of such use of residential properties and determine

Page 134 ends

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 1169 ends

Page 2 of 3 ends

2 8
8 4
whether appropriate regulations could be enacted in order to eliminate or lessen such impacts to a satisfactory level.

On October 2, 2024, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858( d), the City Council adopted and issued a report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030.

On October 15, 2024, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65958( a), at a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1032, which extended the moratorium ( adopted by Interim Urgency Ordinance 1030) for an additional ten ( 10) months and fifteen ( 15) days through September 16, 2025.

ANALYSIS:

Section 65858( d) of the California Government Code provides that ten ( 10) days prior to the expiration of an interim urgency ordinance or any extension thereof, the legislative body shall issue a written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions that led to the adoption of the urgency interim ordinance. The following specific activities have been undertaken:

Studied issues associated with Home Experience Sharing ( including, but not limited to, sanitation, noise, and parking) to determine the impacts that such issues may have upon adjacent residential properties and the public as a whole.

Met with other City Departments/ Divisions and other governmental agencies that may desire or need to inspect and/ or regulate properties that conduct Home Sharing Experiences in order to safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of the Home Sharing Experience hosts and guests, as well as that of the general public.

Studied adopted State regulations pertaining to “public swimming pools” and the suitability of applying said standards to those instances of Home Experience Sharing that include swimming pools.

Evaluated current City noise standards and regulations, and their suitability and applicability to Home Experience Sharing.

Evaluated adopted development standards from other California cities, as well as from other cities located outside of California that have faced surges in Home Experience Sharing, to determine “ best practice” standards that might be applicable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.

Received and responded to complaints received by residents suffering from adverse impacts of Home Experience Sharing on neighboring parcels of property.

Compared the benefits that allowing Home Experience Sharing would provide to the community to the adverse impacts that would result from allowing Home Experience Sharing – even if regulated.

Page 135 ends

Page 1170 ends

Page 3 of 3 ends

2 8
8 4
The above reflect the actions that have been taken since the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinances Nos. 1030 and 1032 in an effort to alleviate the conditions that led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance Nos. 1030 and 1032.

After a thorough evaluation, Staff will be proposing the enactment of an Ordinance that will modify the City’s Development Code to explicitly prohibit Home Experience Sharing within the City.

Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65853 through 65857, a zoning ordinance including an amendment to the City’s Development Code) that imposes, removes, or modifies a regulation of the use of buildings, structures, or lands cannot be submitted to the City Council for consideration until after it has been considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing and the Planning Commission has issued and submitted a recommendation to the City Council.

Due to the pending expiration of the moratorium ( currently scheduled for September 17, 2025), and in order to provide sufficient time for Staff to prepare a permanent ordinance prohibiting Home Experience Sharing for consideration by both the Planning Commission and the City Council, Staff will be seeking an extension of the moratorium extended by Interim Urgency Ordinance 1032 and initially imposed by Interim Urgency Ordinance 1030) - as authorized by California Government Code Section 65858( a).

An opportunity for full public comment on the extension of Interim Urgency Ordinance 1032 will be provided at the City Council’s Public Hearing to be held on July 16, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE( S) ADDRESSED:

This action supports several City Council Core Values including:

Providing and nurturing an excellent quality of life for all.

Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all.

Intentionally embracing and anticipating our future.

Actively seeking and respectfully considering all public input.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Interim Urgency Ordinance 1032
Attachment 2 – Interim Urgency Ordinance 1030

Page 136 ends

Page 1171 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 1043

AN INTERIM URGENCY ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ENACTED PRUSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858
EXTENDING BY 12 MONTHS A MORATORIUM ON THE GRANTING

OF ANY ZONING APPROVAL, HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT, OR

OTHER PERMIT, LICENSE, OR LAND USE ENTITLEMENT FOR

USING REAL PROPERTIES ZONED AND/OR DEVELOPED FOR

RESIDENTIAL USE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMAONGA FOR

HOME EXPERIENCE SHARING, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY

THEREOF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Legislative Findings.

A. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is responsible for enacting and implementing regulations governing the use of land and the conduct of business activities within its boundaries.

B. Within the past few years, the rental of recreational amenities (e.g., swimming pools; playgrounds; barbeques and grills; pickleball courts, tennis courts, and other sports areas; and other exterior portions of real properties) separate and apart from the rental of the residential dwelling – a use that is commonly known as “Home Experience Sharing”, has surged in popularity.

Such impacts would, in turn, result in potential conflicts between Home Sharing Experience guests and neighbors – and an increased expenditure of City resources in responding to complaints.

Additionally, Home Experience Sharing raises health and safety concerns as there are currently no regulations pertaining to minimum standards for maintenance of the recreational amenities, sanitation facilities (especially since the recreational facilities are not rented in conjunction with a residential building), insurance coverage to cover accidents or injuries suffered by these social guests.

C. On September 17, 2024, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030, which enacted an initial 45-day moratorium on Home Experience Sharing in the City.

D. On October 15, 2024, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858(a), the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1032, which extended the moratorium (enacted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030) by an additional 10 months and 15 days.

Page 1172 ends

E. On June 18, 2025, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d), the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted and issued a report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinances Nos. 1030 and 1032.

F. Since the adoption of the moratorium, City Staff has undertaken efforts to study of the benefits and detriments of Home Experience Sharing in order to determine whether such a use would be appropriate within the residential areas of the City – and, after thorough evaluation, Staff will be proposing the enactment of an Ordinance that will modify the City’s Development Code to explicitly prohibit Home Experience Sharing within the City.

G. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65853 through 65857, a zoning ordinance (including an amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code) that imposes, removes, or modifies a regulation of the use of buildings, structures, or lands cannot be submitted to the City Council for consideration until after it has been considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing and the Planning Commission has issued and submitted a recommendation to the City Council.

H. The moratorium enacted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030 (and extended by Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1032) is scheduled to expire on September 17, 2025.

I. An extension of the moratorium is necessary in order to provide Staff sufficient time to prepare a permanent ordinance prohibiting Home Experience Sharing for consideration by both the Planning Commission and City Council at duly noticed public hearings.

J. Absent an extension of the moratorium and the passage of this Ordinance, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and determines that the extension of the current moratorium for 12 months to provide Staff sufficient time to prepare a permanent ordinance prohibiting Home Experience Sharing for consideration by both the Planning Commission and City Council at duly noticed public hearings is immediately necessary and appropriate.

K. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858(d), the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga issued a written report describing the measures that were taken by the City to alleviate the conditions that led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance Nos. 1030 and 1032 and the corresponding moratorium, which was at least ten (10) days prior to the expiration of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030 (as extended by Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1032) and the City Council’s consideration of this extension.

L. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65858 and 65090, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on July 16, 2025, at which time, the City Council considered this Interim Ordinance to extend the existing moratorium on Home Experience Sharing for an additional 12 months.

SECTION 2. Urgency Findings.

The City Council finds and determines that Home Experience Sharing within the City without adequate safeguards upon expiration of the current moratorium presents an immediate

Page 1173 ends

threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that the approval of any zoning approval, home occupation permit, or other permit or land use entitlement for Home Sharing Experiences would constitute an immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. As described in Section 1, the Staff Report accompanying this Urgency Ordinance, and other evidence in the record, Home Sharing Experiences could threaten the health, safety, and welfare of the community through adverse impacts that include, but are not limited to, increased noise, disturbances of the peace and disorderly conduct, and lack of required parking, without adequate safeguards in place to address minimum standards for maintenance of the recreational amenities, sanitation facilities (especially since the recreational facilities are not rented in conjunction with a residential building), and insurance coverage to cover accidents or injuries suffered by these social guests. To preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, the City Council finds that it is necessary to extend the moratorium on Home Experience Sharing and that this Interim Urgency Ordinance take effect immediately pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858, 36934, and 36937 to prevent such harm.

SECTION 3. Extension of Moratorium and Interim Regulations.

A.Definitions. For purposes of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the following terms shall be defined as set forth herein:
“Home Sharing Experience” shall mean the rental or lease of a recreational amenity or recreational amenities located on real property zoned and/or developed for residential use within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, separate from or otherwise not in conjunction with the rental of a residential dwelling unit. “Recreational amenity” or “recreational amenities” shall include any swimming pool, barbeque, grill, pickleball court, basketball court, tennis court, playground, yard area, or other portion of a residentially zoned and/or developed property that is designed or used for recreational activities.

B.Moratorium. Based on the facts and findings set forth in Sections 1 and 2 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby establishes a moratorium providing for the following:

1. Home Experience Sharing, as defined in Section 4.A, above, is unlawful and a public nuisance in all zones within the City during the term of the moratorium established herein or any extension thereof.

2. No Home Experience Sharing activities shall be established or continued, if previously established, in any zone within the City.

3. No application for zoning approval, home occupation permit, or other permit, license, or land use entitlement shall be approved during the term of the moratorium established herein or any extension thereof.

Page 1174 ends

SECTION 4. Enforcement.

The provision of this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall be enforceable pursuant to the general enforcement provisions in Title 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.

SECTION 5. CEQA Findings.

The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty, that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Interim Urgency Ordinance will impose and/or extend a temporary moratorium on the granting of any zoning approval, home occupation permit, or other permit, license, or land use entitlement for Home Experience Sharing in the City in order to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare, and will thereby serve to avoid potentially significant environmental impacts during the term of the moratorium and any extensions thereof. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations.

SECTION 6. Severability.

If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Interim Urgency Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances, if for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that nay one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.

SECTION 7. Effective Date; Approval and Extension of Ordinance.

This Interim Urgency Ordinance, being adopted as an urgency measure for the immediate protection of the public health, safety, and welfare, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency, and passed by a minimum four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, shall take effect concurrent with the expiration of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1030 (as extended by Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 1032) at midnight on September 17, 2025, and shall continue in effect for a period of not longer than twelve (12) months.

This Interim Urgency Ordinance will be superseded upon the effective date of any ordinance enacted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that regulates or prohibits Home Experience Sharing within the City – including the issuance of any zoning approval, Home Occupation Permit, or other permit, license, or land use entitlement for using real properties zoned and/or developed for residential use in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Home Experience Sharing.

Page 1175 ends

Rancho Cucamonga City CouncilJuly 16, 2025

Rancho Cucamonga City Council
July 16, 2025