Agenda packet — Rancho Cucamonga City Council, October 15, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”

Page 1 ends

Mayor
L. Dennis Michael

Mayor Pro Tem
Lynne B. Kennedy

Members of the City
Council:

Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
Ashley Stickler

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
October 15, 2025
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY –

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY

CLOSED SESSION

REGULAR MEETINGS

TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.

The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It is the intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Services Department at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). For City Council Rules of Decorum refer to Resolution No. 2023-086.

Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available in the City Clerk Services Department during normal business hours at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas.

CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.

TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM

ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler

A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS

Page 2 ends

D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION

D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES

DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, JEVIN KAYE,

FINANCE DIRECTOR, MIKE MCCLIMAN, FIRE CHIEF, AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP. (CITY)

D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. D/B/A ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. (CITY)

D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: (3 CASES). THE CITY HAS RECEIVED THREE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS REGARDING THE CITY’S APPROVAL OF A DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR EIGHT SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON CARRARI COURT. COPIES OF THE CLAIMS ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE. (CITY)

D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: (1 CASE). THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A DEMAND LETTER FROM COUNSEL FOR MARJANI BUILDERS. INC., IN CONNECTION WITH THE CITY’S TERMINATION OF MARJANI’S CONTRACT FOR THE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER REHABILITATION PROJECT. A COPY OF THE LETTER IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE. (CITY)

D5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: 1 POTENTIAL CASE. (CITY)

D6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7089 AND 7092 ETIWANDA AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0227-121-56-0000, AND 0227-121-55-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND RICHARD HAMM, PELICAN COMMUNITIES; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY)

E. RECESS

Page 3 ends

REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler

A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS

C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits us from addressing any issue not on the Agenda. Testimony may be received and referred to staff or scheduled for a future meeting.

Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes per individual. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, disorderly or boisterous conduct that disturbs, disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. For more information, refer to the City Council Rules of Decorum and Order (Resolution No. 2023-086) located in the back of the Council Chambers.

The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.

Page 4 ends

CONSENT CALENDARS:

The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.

Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar.

D. CONSENT CALENDAR

D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular and Special Meetings of October 1, 2025.

D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,506,905.24 Dated September 22, 2025, Through October 1, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)

D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $14,510.76 Dated September 22, 2025, Through October 1, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)

D4. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Van Scoyoc Associates to Provide Professional Legislative Representation, Federal Advocacy, and Lobbying Services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (CITY)

D5. Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement #2023-179 with Data Ticket Inc. to Expand the Scope of Services to Include Online Permitting Services, and to Increase the Contract Not-to- Exceed Amount by $225,000 from $725,000 to $950,000 to Fund the Additional Scope of Services for the Remaining Term of the Agreement, with Options to Renew for an Additional Two (2) Years. (CITY)

D6. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Paul A. Biane Library Second Floor Tenant Improvements for Exhibit Installation (Project). This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)

D7. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements for the San Sevaine Trail Project Constructed Under the Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Fontana for Cooperative Planning and Development of the San Sevaine Trail Project (Contract No. 17-029). (CITY)

D8. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Attestation of Veracity for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 2024 Power Source Disclosure Annual Report and Power Content Label. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-081) (CITY)

D9. Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-082, Appointing a Representative and Alternate Representative to the California Intergovernmental Risk Authority (CIRA) Board of Directors, and Predecessor Boards. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-082) (CITY)

E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION

E1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:

ORDINANCE NO. 1047

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.16.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO

SALARIES FOR MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL

Page 5 ends

F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)

G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT

G1. PUBLIC HEARING - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MASTER PLAN, DESIGN REVIEW, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – NEWCASTLE PARTNERS – A Request for Development of One Industrial Warehouse Building Totaling Approximately 334,776 Square Feet on a 14.8-Acre Site Located West of Etiwanda Avenue and South of Arrow Route at 12459 Arrow Route; APN 0229-131-24. An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2023110039) was Prepared for the Project. Primary Case File No. DRC2022-00101. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-079) (CITY)

G2. Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolutions Making Determinations Regarding the Proposed Annexation of Territory, (Annexation 88-25-1) into an Existing Community Facilities District, Adoption of Resolution Calling a Special Election, and Adoption of Resolution Declaring Results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 88-1. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-027 AND FD 2025-028) (FIRE)

H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)

H1. Quarterly Development Update - Third Quarter 2025. (CITY)

H2. Consideration to Receive and File the Economic Development Strategy Annual Progress Report for 2024-2025. (CITY)

H3. Consideration to Receive and File the Garcia Park Field Lighting Project Community Engagement Report. (CITY)

H4. Consideration of First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance No. 1048 to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Adopting the 2025 Edition of the California Building (Model) Codes and the 2024 Edition of the International Building Codes and a Request to Set a Date for a Public Hearing for the Proposed Ordinance. (ORDINANCE NO. 1048 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2025-080) (CITY)

H5. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. FD-060, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Adopting by Reference the 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, With Errata, Together With Certain Changes, Modifications, Amendments, Additions, Deletions, and Exceptions; Providing for the Issuance of Permits and Collection of Fees; and Approving a CEQA Exemption Determination. (ORDINANCE NO. FD-060) (FIRE)

H6. Consideration of Resolution No. FD 2025-026, Setting Forth the Findings that Allow the Board of Directors to Make Amendments and Other Changes to the 2025 California Fire Code by Approval of an Ordinance Adopting Said Fire Code. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-026) (FIRE)

H7. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. FD-061, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Adopting by Reference the 2025 California Fire Code, With Errata, Together With Certain Changes, Modifications, Amendments, Additions, Deletions, and Exceptions; Providing for the Issuance of Permits and Collection of Fees; Repealing Conflicting Ordinances; and Approving a CEQA Exemption Determination. (ORDINANCE NO.

FD-061) (FIRE)

H8. Consideration of Resolution No. FD 2025-025, Setting Forth the Findings that Allow the Fire Board of Directors to Make Amendments and Other Changes to the 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code by Approval of an Ordinance Adopting Said Wildland-Urban Interface Code. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2025-025) (FIRE)

Page 6 ends

I. COUNCIL BUSINESS

I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS

(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)

I2. INTERAGENCY UPDATES

(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)

J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS

K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING

L. ADJOURNMENT

CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.

LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC

CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR

If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk Services Department at (909) 774-2023. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.

*DRAFT*
October 1, 2025 | City Council Special Meeting Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 1
October 1, 2025

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES

The City Council held a Special Meeting on Wednesday, October 1, 2025 in Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER

Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler , Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.

Also present were John Gillison, City Manager; and Patricia Bravo-Valdez, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services.

Council Member Stickler led the Pledge of Allegiance
A. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

None.

B. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION

B1. Recognition of Rancho Cucamonga Spring/Summer Sports Teams - Vineyard Little League.

Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented Certificates of Recognition to the coaches and players of Rancho Cucamonga Vineyard Little League. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council congratulated and thanked the coaches, parents and volunteers for their commitment and support.

C. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 6:48 p.m.

Approved:

Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director

Page 7 ends

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES

The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Closed Session on Wednesday, October 1, 2025, in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM.

Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development/Planning, Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs and Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager of Administrative Services.

A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

None.

C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS

D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION

D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN

RESOURCES DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY

MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, JEVIN KAYE, FINANCE DIRECTOR, MIKE

MCCLIMAN, FIRE CHIEF, AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’

ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP. (CITY)

E. RECESS
The closed session recessed at 5:55 p.m.

Page 8 ends

*DRAFT*
October 1, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 6
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS

The Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on October 1, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.

Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; and Patricia Bravo - Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services.

Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy led the Pledge of Allegiance.

A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA

None.

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS

B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Chaffey College's Industrial Technical Learning Center (InTech) Declaring the Month of October 2025 as Manufacturing Month.

Carina Campos, Management Analyst II, spoke about Manufacturing Month and the importance of raising awareness about modern manufacturing careers. Gloria Negrete -McLeod, President of the Chaffey College Governing Board, shared information about the InTech Center at Chaffey College offering training programs designed to prepare students for manufacturing careers. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented a Proclamation to Chaffey College’s Industrial Technical Learning Center (InTech) declaring the month of October 2025 as Manufacturing Month.

C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

Amaete Umanwah, addressed the City Council and City Manager to request a meeting to discuss his idea of advancing technology in the City of Rancho Cucamonga by building a Chips Semiconductor Manufacturing Company to support the local economy and promote high-tech jobs in the region.

Mr. Umanwah was referred to speak with Matt Marquez, Economic Development Director.

Jackie Relph thanked the City Council and City staff for their efforts in improving table tennis at the James L. Brulte Senior Center.

Adeola Peyton displayed divorce papers, addressed serious family disputes , levied accusations and spoke of procedures for law enforcement to investigate child physical abuse, neglect and sexual abuse.

Page 9 ends

D. CONSENT CALENDAR

Council Member Scott abstained on item D3, due to a potential conflict of interest as her employer is Southern California Gas Company.

D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular and Special Meetings of September 16, 2025 and Regular and Special Meetings of September 3, 2025.

D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $1,624.61 Dated September 8, 2025 Through September 21, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)

D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,598,853.42 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $3,400,236.20 Dated September 8, 2025 Through September 21, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)

D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of August 31, 2025 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)

D5. Consideration to Approve the Use of OMNIA Partners Cooperative Contract Awarded by the City of Tucson Contract Number 240240 -01 to Network Services in Partnership with Waxie to Furnish Janitorial and Sanitation Supplies, Equipment, and Related Products for Fiscal Year 2025/26, and Authorize the Use of Future Renewals as Awarded by City of Tucson Through OMNIA Partners, to be Funded by Various Account Numbers, in Accordance with the Adopted Budget. (CITY/FIRE)

D6. Consideration of Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with REMY Corporation for Workday Functional and Technical Consulting and Staff Augmentation in the Amount of $150,000. (CITY)

D7. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements located on the Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue per Improvement Agreement, Related to Case No. DRC2014 - 01130, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY)

D8. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Day Creek Channel Bike Trail Improvements Project. This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Per Government Code Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. (CITY)

D9. Consideration to Approve the Improvement Agreement for DRC2022 -00275 Located at the Southeast Corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Cultural Center Drive; Accept Faithful Performance Bond and Labor & Materials Bond; and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. This Project has been Determined by Staff to Remain Consistent With the Scope and Intensity of Development Permitted Under the Adopted Master Plan Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 21166 and Sections 15162 and 15168. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-076) (CITY)

Page 10 ends

D10. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Related to Case No. BPR2025 -00023 (Project), Located at 9325 Lomita Drive. This Project has been Determined by Staff to be Permitted by Right Under State Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) Law. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-078) (CITY)

D11. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Related to Case No. DRC2023 -00418 (Project), Located at 10142 24th Street. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-077) (CITY)

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve Consent Calendar Agenda items D1 through D11, with Council Member Scott abstaining on item D3. Motion carried 5-0.

E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION

None.

F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)

Mayor Michael recused himself from item F1, due to a potential conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act, arising out of his equity membership at the Red Hill Country Club and owner ship of a property within 500 feet of the Red Hill Country Club. Mayor Michael asked Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy to conduct the Administrative Hearing and left the room at 7:17 p.m.

F1. Preliminary Review Hearing to Consider Proposed General Plan Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments to Redesignate 3 Acres of Land at the Red Hill Country Club from a General Plan Land Use Designation of General Open Space and Facilities to Traditional Neighborhood and Rezone the Land from Parks (P) to Low (L) Residential along the Ninth Hole of the Golf Course and Calle Casino for the Purpose of Single -Family Residential Development and Redesignate 3 Acres of Land from a General Plan Land Use Designation of General Open Space and Facilities to Suburban Neighborhood - Low and Rezone the Land from Parks (P) to Medium (M) Residential for the Purpose of Multi -Family Development in the Existing Lower Parking Lot and Tennis Courts of the Country Club along Red Hill Country Club Drive. (CITY)

City Manager Gillison introduced Sophia Serafin, Assistant Planner and Jen nifer Nakamura, Planning Director, who provided a PowerPoint presentation for item F1. Three (3) letters were received in opposition by Mark and Tracy Schultze, Gerald McIntosh, Javier and Lizette Garcia to item F1, copies of the correspondence received were provided to the City Council and were available for the public to review on the City’s website. Assistant Planner Serafin noted that tonight’s hearing was solely an opportunity for the City Council and community to provide comments so that the applicant can consider whether to proceed with the applications, recognizing that the Council’s direction is not an approval, a guarantee of future approval, nor a guarantee of future recommendation of approval from staff.

Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy opened the Administrative Hearing.

Seven (7) speakers: Renee Massey, Melissa Sparks, Michelle Lindley, Gabe Mendez, William Gray, Lizette Ga rcia and Samantha Hull, spoke in opposition to item F1. Speakers shared concerns about increased traffic on narrow roads, noise, public safety due to proposed high density housing , loss of historic preservation , lack of cohesion in project design/aesthetics with existing neighborhood , Red Hill Country Club’s responsibility of subsidizing the project and the lack of transparency/communication with the community and equity members of the Red Hill Country Club.

Page 11 ends

*DRAFT*
October 1, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 6
Applicant, Mark Bertone with Madole and Associates , addressed concerns presented during Public Communications and spoke about the proposed project.

Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy closed the Administrative Hearing.

Council Member Stickler thanked speakers for sharing their concerns and asked the applicant if equity members were notified of preliminary plans.

In response, Applicant, Mark Bertone with Madole and Associates , informed that Red Hill Country Club bylaws allow the Board of Directors to explore opportunities without notifying equity members. He noted that next steps include taking the proposed project to the membership for a vote and that if a 51% vote in opposition is received, the project will not be pursued.

Council Member Stickler spoke in opposition to the proposal, echoing the community's concerns.

Council provided comments regarding entitled projects near the area , precedent it would set for amending the General Plan, importance of community/equity member engagement and potential impacts to the historic preservation and character of the site.

Based on public and council comments, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy provided feedback to the applicant to receive input from the board, equity member s, neighbors being affected from any developments and city staff in proposing significant changes to the General Plan.

Upon conclusion of item F1, Mayor Michael returned to the dais at 8:04 p.m. to continue with the meeting

G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT

None.

H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)

None.

I. COUNCIL BUSINESS

I1. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 1047, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Pertaining to Salaries for Mayor and Members of the City Council. (ORDINANCE NO. 1047) (CITY)

Peter Casto, Deputy City Manager of Administrative Services, provided a verbal report for item I1 and noted that an updated Ordinance No. 1047 correcting a typographical error was provided to the City Council and was made available for the public to review on the City’s website.

Council Member Hutchison inquired about the total monthly salary increase amount for the positions of Mayor and Members of the City Council.

In response, Deputy City Manager Castro informed the total monthly salary increase is approximately $90.00 for the position of Mayor and $80.00 for Members of the City Council.

Mayor Michael spoke of the City Council’s dedication to serving the community and commitment to unified governance.

Page 12 ends

MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to Introduce First Reading of Ordinance No. 1047, by title only and waive further reading.

Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services , read the title of Ordinance No. 1047 by title only.

ORDINANCE NO. 1047

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.16.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING

TO SALARIES FOR MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to Introduce First Reading of Ordinance No. 1047, by title only and waive further reading . Motion carried 5-0.

I2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS

None.

I3. INTERAGENCY UPDATES

None.

J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS

City Attorney Ghirelli noted that there was no reportable action taken during Closed Session held earlier that evening.

K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING

None.

L. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Michael adjourned the Council Meeting at 8:09 p.m.

Approved:

Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director

Page 13 ends

DATE:October 15, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,506,905.24 Dated September 22, 2025, Through October 1, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $2,334,401.70 and $172,503.54 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.

BACKGROUND:

N/A
ANALYSIS:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register

Page 14 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 1 of 14 ends

Company: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Payment Date On or After: 09/22/2025
Payment Date On or Before: 10/01/2025
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Placeworks:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Placeworks 1,975.00 0 1,975.00
Supplier Payment: Ronald Smith:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Ronald Smith 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Beverly Mackall:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Beverly Mackall 0 185.08 185.08
Supplier Payment: Moore United
Construction, Inc.: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454314 09/25/2025 Moore United Construction,
Inc.
26,564.00 0 26,564.00
Supplier Payment: Ralph Crane:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Ralph Crane 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Aquabio
Environmental Technologies Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454261 09/25/2025 Aquabio Environmental
Technologies Inc
1,737.28 0 1,737.28
Supplier Payment: G/M Business
Interiors: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 G/M Business Interiors 52,507.65 0 52,507.65 Supplier Payment: Mediwaste
Disposal Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454307 09/25/2025 Mediwaste Disposal Llc 41.03 0 41.03
Supplier Payment: Environment
Planning Dvmt Solutions:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454283 09/25/2025 Environment Planning
Dvmt Solutions
0 5,420.75 5,420.75
Supplier Payment: National Utility
Locators Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 National Utility Locators Llc 2,270.00 0 2,270.00 Supplier Payment: Francis
Vanderkallen: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Francis Vanderkallen 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 San Bernardino County 20.00 0 20.00
Supplier Payment: C V W D:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454275 09/25/2025 C V W D 217,961.44 0 217,961.44
Supplier Payment: William Lane:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 William Lane 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 15 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 2 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: California Ppe
Recon Inc: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 California Ppe Recon Inc 0 12,774.00 12,774.00 Supplier Payment: Ids Group Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454298 09/25/2025 Ids Group Inc 17,968.40 0 17,968.40
Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal
Health: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454315 09/25/2025 Mwi Animal Health 1,316.15 0 1,316.15 Supplier Payment: Cheryl L
Roberts: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Cheryl L Roberts 0 3,077.83 3,077.83
Supplier Payment: Sun Badge Co:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454336 09/25/2025 Sun Badge Co 0 8,030.12 8,030.12
Supplier Payment: Allied Universal
Security Services: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454255 09/25/2025 Allied Universal Security
Services
33,053.66 0 33,053.66
Supplier Payment: Michael
Eagleson: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Michael Eagleson 0 2,331.10 2,331.10
Supplier Payment: IBM
Corporation: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454296 09/25/2025 IBM Corporation 726.03 0 726.03
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto
Parts: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Napa Auto Parts 55.11 0 55.11
Supplier Payment: Hose-Man Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454295 09/25/2025 Hose-Man Inc 1,057.40 0 1,057.40
Supplier Payment: Circlepoint:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454272 09/25/2025 Circlepoint 7,827.00 0 7,827.00
Supplier Payment: Philip Loncar:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Philip Loncar 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Jackie Deans:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Jackie Deans 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Richard Toll:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Richard Toll 0 3,127.70 3,127.70
Supplier Payment: William Spain:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 William Spain 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Victoria Animal
Hospital: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454346 09/25/2025 Victoria Animal Hospital 100.00 0 100.00 Supplier Payment: Thomson
Reuters - West: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454339 09/25/2025 Thomson Reuters - West 398.00 0 398.00

Page 16 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 3 of 14 ends

5.76 0 5.76
Supplier Payment: Robert Eggers:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Robert Eggers 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Timothy A
Yowell: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Timothy A Yowell 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Michael
Nauman: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Michael Nauman 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Vista Paint:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454350 09/25/2025 Vista Paint 58.61 0 58.61
Supplier Payment: Idexx
Distribution Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454297 09/25/2025 Idexx Distribution Inc 2,867.08 0 2,867.08 Supplier Payment: Allstar Fire
Equipment Inc: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Allstar Fire Equipment Inc 0 941.91 941.91
Supplier Payment: Scott D
Sorensen: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Scott D Sorensen 0 1,671.25 1,671.25
Supplier Payment: Paul E Lenze:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Paul E Lenze 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Liebert Cassidy
Whitmore: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454304 09/25/2025 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 900.00 0 900.00 Supplier Payment: Peter
Magnuson: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Peter Magnuson 0 1,685.46 1,685.46
Supplier Payment: MNS Engineers,
Inc.: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454312 09/25/2025 MNS Engineers, Inc. 38,388.75 0 38,388.75 Supplier Payment: Working Dogs
for Warriors, Corp: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454353 09/25/2025 Working Dogs for Warriors,
Corp
0 12,000.00 12,000.00
Supplier Payment: California Public
Policy Group, Inc.: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454269 09/25/2025 California Public Policy
Group, Inc.
19,000.00 0 19,000.00
Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric
Company Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Graybar Electric Company
Inc
849.63 0 849.63

Page 17 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 4 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Elecnor Belco
Electric Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Elecnor Belco Electric Inc 38,502.54 0 38,502.54 Supplier Payment: Mariposa
Landscapes Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 4,395.72 0 4,395.72
Supplier Payment: Montgomery
Hardware Co: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454313 09/25/2025 Montgomery Hardware Co 401.78 0 401.78 Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454333 09/25/2025 Southern California Edison 0 11,170.57 11,170.57 Supplier Payment: Allan J Lee:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Allan J Lee 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Alexander R
Ahumada: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Alexander R Ahumada 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Michael J
Ploung: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Michael J Ploung 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Boot Barn Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454268 09/25/2025 Boot Barn Inc 3,994.49 0 3,994.49
Supplier Payment: Beacon Athletics
Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454266 09/25/2025 Beacon Athletics Llc 511.82 0 511.82
Supplier Payment: Yunex Llc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Yunex Llc 2,708.64 0 2,708.64
Supplier Payment: Pars:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454322 09/25/2025 Pars 3,500.00 0 3,500.00
Supplier Payment: Ivan M Rojer:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Ivan M Rojer 0 1,695.04 1,695.04
Supplier Payment: Michael L Bell:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Michael L Bell 0 1,690.43 1,690.43
Supplier Payment: Lloyd Almand:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Lloyd Almand 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Brinks
Incorporated: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Brinks Incorporated 3,249.56 0 3,249.56
Supplier Payment: Soca Arts:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454330 09/25/2025 Soca Arts 2,164.80 0 2,164.80
Supplier Payment: Gentry General
Engineering Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Gentry General
Engineering Inc
2,451.81 0 2,451.81
Supplier Payment: Mig Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454310 09/25/2025 Mig Inc 5,086.25 0 5,086.25

Page 18 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 5 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Eric Noreen:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Eric Noreen 0 3,127.70 3,127.70
Supplier Payment: Gbs Linens:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454286 09/25/2025 Gbs Linens 805.33 0 805.33
Supplier Payment: Civic Solutions
Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Civic Solutions Inc 834.75 0 834.75
Supplier Payment: Mcfadden-Dale
Hardware: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454306 09/25/2025 Mcfadden-Dale Hardware 139.94 0 139.94 Supplier Payment: Charlene
Dominick: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454271 09/25/2025 Charlene Dominick 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Steven
Campbell: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Steven Campbell 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Bern Marie'S
Promotional Products: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454267 09/25/2025 Bern Marie'S Promotional
Products
2,525.44 0 2,525.44
Supplier Payment: Midwest Tape
Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Midwest Tape Llc 8,331.78 0 8,331.78
Supplier Payment: Coast Fitness
Repair Shop: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454273 09/25/2025 Coast Fitness Repair Shop 300.00 0 300.00 Supplier Payment: James Sullivan:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 James Sullivan 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Best Outdoor
Power Inland Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Best Outdoor Power Inland
Llc
102.33 0 102.33
Supplier Payment: Karl Cox:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Karl Cox 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Richards
Watson & Gershon: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
18,115.93 0 18,115.93
Supplier Payment: Terra Vista
Animal Hospital: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454338 09/25/2025 Terra Vista Animal Hospital 100.00 0 100.00 Supplier Payment: East Valley
Emergency Pet Clinic Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454280 09/25/2025 East Valley Emergency Pet
Clinic Inc
400.00 0 400.00
Supplier Payment: Willdan Group:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454352 09/25/2025 Willdan Group 12,122.37 0 12,122.37
Supplier Payment: Rancho
Cucamonga Chamber Of
Commerce: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454326 09/25/2025 Rancho Cucamonga
Chamber Of Commerce
150.00 0 150.00
Supplier Payment: Shred Pros:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454328 09/25/2025 Shred Pros 104.00 0 104.00

Page 19 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 6 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Dennis M
Costello: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Dennis M Costello 0 2,331.10 2,331.10
Supplier Payment: Ron Mayfield:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Ron Mayfield 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: 360 Deep
Cleaning Llc: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 360 Deep Cleaning Llc 0 9,230.00 9,230.00
Supplier Payment: Steven Taylor:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Steven Taylor 0 2,369.46 2,369.46
Supplier Payment: Inland Presort &
Mailing Services: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454302 09/25/2025 Inland Presort & Mailing
Services
346.72 0 346.72
Supplier Payment: Barbara'S
Answering Service: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454265 09/25/2025 Barbara'S Answering
Service
552.00 0 552.00
Supplier Payment: D & K Concrete
Company: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454277 09/25/2025 D & K Concrete Company 3,185.10 0 3,185.10 Supplier Payment: Anthony Varney:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Anthony Varney 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Medline
Industries Lp: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454308 09/25/2025 Medline Industries Lp 889.90 0 889.90 Supplier Payment: Occupational
Health Centers Of Ca: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454317 09/25/2025 Occupational Health
Centers Of Ca
2,928.00 0 2,928.00
Supplier Payment: Inland Overhead
Door Company: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454301 09/25/2025 Inland Overhead Door
Company
4,574.00 0 4,574.00
Supplier Payment: Cobra
Professionals, INC.: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Cobra Professionals, INC. 0 166.90 166.90
Supplier Payment: Jay Davenport:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Jay Davenport 0 3,077.83 3,077.83
Supplier Payment: James Curatalo:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 James Curatalo 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Dependable
Break Room Solutions Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454279 09/25/2025 Dependable Break Room
Solutions Inc
112.69 0 112.69
Supplier Payment: Thomas
Salisbury: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Thomas Salisbury 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: City Of
Riverside: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 City Of Riverside 11,409.00 0 11,409.00

Page 20 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 7 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Patrick Jerkins:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Patrick Jerkins 0 1,695.04 1,695.04
Supplier Payment: Inland Valley
Repertory Theatre: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Inland Valley Repertory
Theatre
17,684.20 0 17,684.20
Supplier Payment: Susan De
Antonio: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Susan De Antonio 0 1,105.73 1,105.73
Supplier Payment: Tim Fejeran:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Tim Fejeran 0 2,250.95 2,250.95
Supplier Payment: Imagetrend Llc:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454299 09/25/2025 Imagetrend Llc 0 2,833.34 2,833.34
Supplier Payment: Virtual Project
Manager Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454349 09/25/2025 Virtual Project Manager Llc 500.00 0 500.00 Supplier Payment: L. Dennis
Michael: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 L. Dennis Michael 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Adobe Animal
Hospital: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454252 09/25/2025 Adobe Animal Hospital 600.00 0 600.00 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454284 09/25/2025 Frontier Comm 972.09 0 972.09
Supplier Payment: Armada Towing
Service: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454263 09/25/2025 Armada Towing Service 125.00 0 125.00 Supplier Payment: Victoria Bantau:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Victoria Bantau 0 658.62 658.62
Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths
Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Abc Locksmiths Inc 4,500.00 0 4,500.00
Supplier Payment: Opticos Design,
Inc.: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454321 09/25/2025 Opticos Design, Inc. 2,200.00 0 2,200.00 Supplier Payment: H L Hitchcock
Construction Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454293 09/25/2025 H L Hitchcock Construction
Inc
42,664.00 0 42,664.00
Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Dlr Group Inc 66,904.46 0 66,904.46
Supplier Payment: Richard Clabby:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Richard Clabby 0 817.12 817.12
Supplier Payment: Globalstar Usa:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454287 09/25/2025 Globalstar Usa 181.66 0 181.66

Page 21 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 8 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto
Parts: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 1,066.39 1,066.39
Supplier Payment: Paymentus
Corporation: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Paymentus Corporation 1,426.50 0 1,426.50
Supplier Payment: Standard
Insurance Company: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454334 09/25/2025 Standard Insurance
Company
2,880.67 0 2,880.67
Supplier Payment: John Mckee:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 John Mckee 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Apx Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454260 09/25/2025 Apx Inc 1,151.99 0 1,151.99
Supplier Payment: Sound
Productions, LLC: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Sound Productions, LLC 387.90 0 387.90
Supplier Payment: Postal Perfect:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454325 09/25/2025 Postal Perfect 220.00 0 220.00
Supplier Payment: Hilti, Inc.:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454292 09/25/2025 Hilti, Inc. 3,519.24 0 3,519.24
Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock
Co Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454294 09/25/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 1,264.98 0 1,264.98 Supplier Payment: Wilbur
Crossland: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Wilbur Crossland 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Alma Arocho:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454256 09/25/2025 Alma Arocho 201.60 0 201.60
Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Data Ticket Inc 2,027.66 0 2,027.66
Supplier Payment: C V W D:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454276 09/25/2025 C V W D 0 2,821.98 2,821.98
Supplier Payment: SimsUShare:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454329 09/25/2025 SimsUShare 0 2,320.00 2,320.00
Supplier Payment: Daniel A Moisa:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Daniel A Moisa 873.60 0 873.60
Supplier Payment: Danny G Holt:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Danny G Holt 0 1,730.68 1,730.68
Supplier Payment: Tirehub Llc:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454340 09/25/2025 Tirehub Llc 0 610.29 610.29
Supplier Payment: Animal Health
Diagnostic Center: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454259 09/25/2025 Animal Health Diagnostic
Center
598.20 0 598.20

Page 22 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 9 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Kevin Walton:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Kevin Walton 0 658.62 658.62
Supplier Payment: Kenneth Mcneil:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Kenneth Mcneil 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: David W Larkin:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 David W Larkin 0 768.52 768.52
Supplier Payment: Verizon:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454345 09/25/2025 Verizon 50.68 0 50.68
Supplier Payment: Jeffrey Roeder:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Jeffrey Roeder 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Patrick Proulx:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Patrick Proulx 0 1,690.43 1,690.43
Supplier Payment: Porac Legal
Defense Fund: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454324 09/25/2025 Porac Legal Defense Fund 208.00 0 208.00 Supplier Payment: Main Street
Signs: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Main Street Signs 712.31 0 712.31
Supplier Payment: Henry Schein
Inc: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454290 09/25/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 796.32 796.32
Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks
Vet Hospital: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454288 09/25/2025 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 1,000.00 0 1,000.00 Supplier Payment: William M
Kirkpatrick: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 William M Kirkpatrick 0 907.46 907.46
Supplier Payment: Byron Morgan:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Byron Morgan 0 515.44 515.44
Supplier Payment: Active Network
Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Active Network Llc 600.00 0 600.00
Supplier Payment: Only Cremations
For Pets Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454319 09/25/2025 Only Cremations For Pets
Inc
1,324.00 0 1,324.00
Supplier Payment: Department Of
Justice: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454278 09/25/2025 Department Of Justice 981.00 0 981.00 Supplier Payment: Constellation
Energy Generation Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Constellation Energy
Generation Llc
890,071.20 0 890,071.20
Supplier Payment: Inland Empire
Blue Belles: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454300 09/25/2025 Inland Empire Blue Belles 450.00 0 450.00

Page 23 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 10 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Eide Bailly, LLP:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454281 09/25/2025 Eide Bailly, LLP 84,813.16 0 84,813.16 Supplier Payment: Sargent Town
Planning Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Sargent Town Planning Inc 12,762.60 0 12,762.60 Supplier Payment: Air Exchange
Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Air Exchange Inc 517.34 0 517.34
Supplier Payment: Stephen Kilmer:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Stephen Kilmer 0 768.52 768.52
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454285 09/25/2025 Frontier Comm 0 563.88 563.88
Supplier Payment: Jorry Keith:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Jorry Keith 90.00 0 90.00
Supplier Payment: Alta Loma
Animal Hospital: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454257 09/25/2025 Alta Loma Animal Hospital 400.00 0 400.00 Supplier Payment: Archibald Pet
Hospital: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454262 09/25/2025 Archibald Pet Hospital 600.00 0 600.00 Supplier Payment: Mity-Lite, Inc.:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454311 09/25/2025 Mity-Lite, Inc. 12,052.59 0 12,052.59 Supplier Payment: Viola Spagnolo:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454348 09/25/2025 Viola Spagnolo 0 329.56 329.56
Supplier Payment: Newco
Distributors Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454316 09/25/2025 Newco Distributors Inc 1,386.53 0 1,386.53 Supplier Payment: Tuff Shed Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454342 09/25/2025 Tuff Shed Inc 8,670.62 0 8,670.62
Supplier Payment: Covetrus North
America: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454274 09/25/2025 Covetrus North America 2,321.20 0 2,321.20 Supplier Payment: Auto & Rv
Specialists Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454264 09/25/2025 Auto & Rv Specialists Inc 71.17 0 71.17 Supplier Payment: Gerald
Campbell: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Gerald Campbell 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: David Berry:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 David Berry 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: James Dague:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 James Dague 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Vendnovation
Llc: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454344 09/25/2025 Vendnovation Llc 0 562.35 562.35

Page 24 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 11 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Terry Tuley:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Terry Tuley 0 2,369.46 2,369.46
Supplier Payment: Donald R
Cloughesy: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Donald R Cloughesy 0 2,369.46 2,369.46
Supplier Payment: Gentry Brothers
Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Gentry Brothers Inc 81,837.75 0 81,837.75
Supplier Payment: Donald Heyde:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Donald Heyde 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Dennis Myskow:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Dennis Myskow 0 1,695.04 1,695.04
Supplier Payment: Grainger:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Grainger 1,349.10 0 1,349.10
Supplier Payment: Pepe'S Towing
Service: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454323 09/25/2025 Pepe'S Towing Service 540.00 0 540.00 Supplier Payment: Pacific Utility
Installation Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Pacific Utility Installation
Inc
168,725.99 0 168,725.99
Supplier Payment: Michael R Post:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Michael R Post 0 2,331.10 2,331.10
Supplier Payment: Hdl Coren &
Cone: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454289 09/25/2025 Hdl Coren & Cone 5,431.25 0 5,431.25
Supplier Payment: Tom O'Brien:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Tom O'Brien 0 2,369.46 2,369.46
Supplier Payment: Michael Baker
International Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Michael Baker International
Inc
8,898.75 0 8,898.75
Supplier Payment: Brent Roberts:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Brent Roberts 0 1,086.55 1,086.55
Supplier Payment: Trueline
Construction & Surfacing Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454341 09/25/2025 Trueline Construction &
Surfacing Inc
21,150.00 0 21,150.00
Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials
Company: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454351 09/25/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 684.96 0 684.96 Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454318 09/25/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 0 508.98 508.98 Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange
County Janitorial Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454270 09/25/2025 Ccs Orange County
Janitorial Inc
78,166.37 0 78,166.37

Page 25 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 12 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Zoll Medical
Corporation: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454354 09/25/2025 Zoll Medical Corporation 0 3,203.52 3,203.52 Supplier Payment: Onward
Engineering: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454320 09/25/2025 Onward Engineering 33,620.00 0 33,620.00 Supplier Payment: Darrell Luttrull:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Darrell Luttrull 0 528.16 528.16
Supplier Payment: Alta Rancho Pet
& Bird Hospital: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454258 09/25/2025 Alta Rancho Pet & Bird
Hospital
300.00 0 300.00
Supplier Payment: Teaching
Strategies Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454337 09/25/2025 Teaching Strategies Llc 6,500.00 0 6,500.00 Supplier Payment: Susan Bazal:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Susan Bazal 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Kenneth
Carnes: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Kenneth Carnes 0 185.08 185.08
Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454254 09/25/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 24.05 0 24.05
Supplier Payment: Robin Brock:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Robin Brock 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Aflac:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454253 09/25/2025 Aflac 4,438.80 0 4,438.80
Supplier Payment: Unity Courier
Service Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454343 09/25/2025 Unity Courier Service Inc 682.34 0 682.34 Supplier Payment: Champion Fire
Systems Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Champion Fire Systems Inc 21,250.64 0 21,250.64 Supplier Payment: Ln Curtis &
Sons: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454305 09/25/2025 Ln Curtis & Sons 0 346.29 346.29
Supplier Payment: Hill'S Pet
Nutrition Sales Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454291 09/25/2025 Hill'S Pet Nutrition Sales
Inc
755.43 0 755.43
Supplier Payment: Rosalyn
Interlicchia: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Rosalyn Interlicchia 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Kenneth Walker:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454303 09/25/2025 Kenneth Walker 0 426.70 426.70
Supplier Payment: Red Wing
Business Advantage Account:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454327 09/25/2025 Red Wing Business
Advantage Account
342.08 0 342.08

Page 26 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 13 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: John D Fritchey:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 John D Fritchey 0 658.62 658.62
Supplier Payment: EN Engineering,
LLC: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454282 09/25/2025 EN Engineering, LLC 5,440.66 0 5,440.66 Supplier Payment: Victor
Rodriguez: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454347 09/25/2025 Victor Rodriguez 0 1,011.40 1,011.40
Supplier Payment: Ups: 09/25/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Ups 56.41 0 56.41
Supplier Payment: State of
California: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454335 09/25/2025 State of California 125.00 0 125.00
Supplier Payment: Mary Jane
Nelson: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Mary Jane Nelson 0 185.08 185.08
Supplier Payment: Richards
Watson & Gershon: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
0 2,138.50 2,138.50
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454375 09/25/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 3,171.11 0 3,171.11 Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary
Supply: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454379 09/25/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 24,521.54 0 24,521.54 Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454366 09/25/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 24.05 0 24.05
Supplier Payment: Superior
Pavement Markings Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454378 09/25/2025 Superior Pavement
Markings Inc
2,083.99 0 2,083.99
Supplier Payment: Life-Assist Inc:
09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
09/25/2025 Life-Assist Inc 0 2,062.98 2,062.98
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454376 09/25/2025 Southern California Edison 28,925.97 0 28,925.97 Supplier Payment: Grainger:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Grainger 248.20 0 248.20
Supplier Payment: Bmla Inc:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454367 09/25/2025 Bmla Inc 3,640.00 0 3,640.00
Supplier Payment: Dog Waste
Depot: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454369 09/25/2025 Dog Waste Depot 2,899.55 0 2,899.55
Supplier Payment: Willdan Group:
09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454380 09/25/2025 Willdan Group 9,446.50 0 9,446.50
Supplier Payment: Consolidated
Electrical Distr Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Consolidated Electrical
Distr Inc
482.85 0 482.85

Page 27 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
09:40 AM
10/06/2025

Page 14 of 14 ends

66.89 0 66.89
Supplier Payment: Wilson & Bell
Auto Service: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454381 09/25/2025 Wilson & Bell Auto Service 536.72 0 536.72 Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric
Company Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
09/25/2025 Graybar Electric Company
Inc
1,519.02 0 1,519.02
Supplier Payment: Lowes
Companies Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454371 09/25/2025 Lowes Companies Inc 11,886.22 0 11,886.22 Supplier Payment: Stanley Pest
Control: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454377 09/25/2025 Stanley Pest Control 4,140.00 0 4,140.00 Supplier Payment: Mesa Energy
Systems Inc: 09/25/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
454374 09/25/2025 Mesa Energy Systems Inc 48,303.18 0 48,303.18 Supplier Payment: Cintas
Corporation: 09/25/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
454368 09/25/2025 Cintas Corporation 0 85.98 85.98
2,334,401.70 172,503.54 2,506,905.24

Page 28 ends

DATE:October 15, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $14,510.76 Dated September 22, 2025, Through October 1, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $13,788.18 and $722.58 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.

BACKGROUND:

N/A
ANALYSIS:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register

Page 29 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - SoCal Gas
09:46 AM
10/06/2025

Page 1 of 1 ends

Page 30 ends

DATE: October 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director Hope Velarde, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Van Scoyoc Associates to Provide Professional Legislative Representation, Federal Advocacy, and Lobbying Services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the agreement with Van Scoyoc Associates to provide professional legislative representation, federal advocacy, and lobbying services in the amount of $4,500 per month, for a period of three years, with two optional one-year extensions.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Rancho Cucamonga has an aggressive Legislative Affairs Program that promotes the legislative interests of the City at the County, State, and Federal government levels. The City actively monitors State and Federal legislation and communicates its position to appropriate State and Federal representatives. The City also aggressively seeks Federal, State, and County funding through grants, and other discretionary funding for City projects, programs, and services. In order to make sure that our interests and needs are heard at the Federal level, the City has utilized the services of a Federal Lobbying firm, Van Scoyoc Associates, for the last 13 years. In May 2025, the City went out to bid for federal lobbying and advocacy services. The selected Federal Lobbying firm will continue to advocate for the City and will be tasked with several objectives, including:
Represent the City in Washington D. C. in terms of communicating the City' s interests to the appropriate elected representatives, key Committee members, Executive Branch and federal agencies
Identify potential funding opportunities that match the City' s funding needs Aid in securing federal funding for City projects and programs Develop and maintain positive working relationships between the City and California congressional delegation, federal agencies, and the Executive Branch Work with federal agencies and officials to resolve issues on the City' s behalf Identify federal legislation of interest to the City, monitor action on these initiatives, and advocate for the City' s interest when appropriate
ANALYSIS:

The City Manager' s Office provided a scope of work to the Procurement Division. Procurement prepared and posted a formal Request for Proposal #25/26-007 to the City' s online bid system.

Page 31 ends

Page 2 ends

3 0
5 8
As a result, eight responses were received. After analysis of the RFP responses by the evaluation committee, Van Scoyoc Associates was determined to be the most responsive and responsible firm providing the best value meeting the scope of services and specifications required.

Established in 1990, Van Scoyoc Associates is among the largest independent government affairs consulting firms in Washington, D. C., and consistently ranks in the top five of Federal advocacy firms. Van Scoyoc Associates has a well staffed team of over 40 principals and legislative associates and staff and is consciously bipartisan with Republicans and Democrats. Van Scoyoc Associates has substantial experience representing California municipalities, counties, and local governmental agencies. The proposed team that will be representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga include Vice President Jim Crum and Government Relations Director Maggie McGrane.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The term of the agreement will be for three years with two optional one – year extensions.

Services will continue to be provided for a monthly retainer of $ 4,500 per month, which is the current budgeted amount, plus incidental travel expenses not to exceed $ 2,000 per year. The expenses are budgeted and funded by F001/CC109/SC2106.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item helps aligns with the City Council's values of providing and nurturing an excellent quality of life for all, promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, intentionally embracing and anticipating our future, and working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders as federal advocacy and lobbying services will support the City in advancing Rancho Cucamonga' s interests at the federal level.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - PSA with Van Scoyoc Associates

Page 32 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 1 Last Revised: 01/11/2018

AGREEMENT FOR

DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 15 day of October , 20 25 , by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Van Scoyoc Associates , a lobbying firm (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following design professional services: Federal Advocacy and Lobbying (“the Project”).

B. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services described in Recital “A”, above, necessary to complete the Project.

C. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein.

D. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Consultant’s Services.

1.1Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and design professional services described in Recitals “A” and “B” above, including, but not limited to Federal Advocacy and Lobbying , all as more fully set forth in the Consultant’s proposal, dated 7/7/2025 and entitled “Scope of Work”, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control.

1.2Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based

Page 33 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 2 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Consultant’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City’s City Manager without amendment.

1.3Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a “Schedule of Performance”, if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit “ A ”.

1.4Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services.

1.5Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative.

2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be three (3) years and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties’ signature (the “Effective Date”). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled.

Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of two (2) years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager’s approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City.

3. Compensation.

3.1Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant shall not exceed $ 4,500 monthly retainer plus not to exceed $2,000 annually in

Page 34 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 3 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
travel expenses ( four thousand five hundred dollars monthly retainer plus not to exceed two thousand dollars annually in travel expenses ), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Council.

City shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed.

The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A.

4. Method of Payment.

4.1Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.

4.2City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts.

4.3City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in Section 3.

4.4All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City.

5. Representatives.

5.1City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City’s representative shall be Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director , or such other person as designated in writing by the City (“City Representative”). It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative.

5.2Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Jim Crum, Vice President is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability

Page 35 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 4 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City.

6. Consultant’s Personnel.

6.1All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license as required by the City’s Municipal Code.

6.2Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4.

6.3Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

6.4Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6.

7. Ownership of Work Product.

7.1Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be “works made for hire” for the benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product

Page 36 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 5 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City’s reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City’s sole risk.

7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law.

City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.

7.3Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions.

Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City’s use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non- infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant

Page 37 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 6 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement.

Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant’s employees.

9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim.

10. Conflict of Interest.

10.1Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.

Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant “financially interested” (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained.

10.2Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift.

Page 38 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 7 Last Revised: 01/11/2018

10.3Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1.

11. Indemnification.

11.1Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees” in this Section 11.0), from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, stop notices, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants and other professionals, and all costs associated therewith, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively “Claims”), whether actual, alleged or threatened, to the extent arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and/or its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual for which or whom the Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the performance of design professional services under this Agreement by a “design professional,” as the term is defined in California Civil Code § 2782.8(c). The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing and as required by Civil Code § 2782.8(a), in no event shall the cost to defend the Indemnitees that is charged to Consultant exceed Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

11.2Other Indemnities. With respect to claims and liabilities which do not arise in connection with the performance of professional services by a “design professional”, as that term is defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c), including, but not limited to, those claims and liabilities normally covered by commercial general and/or automobile liability insurance, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, stop notices, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys and other professionals, and all costs associated therewith, and the payment of all consequential damages (collectively “Damages”), in law or equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers, or contractors, or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or

Page 39 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 8 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
individual for which or whom Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the performance of this Agreement, except to the extent the Damages arise from the active or sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Damages with counsel of the Indemnitees’ choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs as they are actually incurred in connection with such defense.

Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by the Indemnitees in connection therewith. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.
. 11.3Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement.

11.4Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant.

11.5Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision.

12. Insurance.

12.1Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors.

12.2Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed.
1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).

Page 40 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 9 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
(3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the City, having an extended reporting period of not less than three (3) years after completion of the Services which shall provide protection against claims of professional
negligence arising out of Consultant’s performance of the Services and otherwise complying with all applicable
provisions of this Section 12. The policy shall be
endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent insurable.

12.3Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.

Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers’
Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law.
(4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate. (5) The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be the greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum insurance requirements shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in
excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City.

No representation is made that the minimum insurance
requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement.

12.4Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements.

12.5Other Insurance Provisions.

Page 41 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 10 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
(1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a
separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of
Consultant; products and completed operations of
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or
borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated
volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. (4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has been given to City (ten (10) days prior written notice for non-payment of premium). Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to implementation of a reduction of limits or material change of insurance
coverage as specified herein.
(5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials.

Page 42 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 11 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
(6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co.

Rating Guide.
(7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided.
(8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits.
(9) Contractor shall provide any and all other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement.

12.6 Evidence of coverage.Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker’s Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf.

All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Consultant shall provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance.

12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor’s work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub- subcontractor.

13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might

Page 43 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 12 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties.

14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party.

Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes.

15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant’s and City’s regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section.

All notices shall be addressed as follows:

If to City: Michael Parmer, ESP Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

If to Consultant:Jim Crum, Vice President
Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc.
800 Maine Avenue, SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024

16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that

Page 44 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 13 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation.

17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant’s obligations hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Consultant performs the Services. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the Project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default.

20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts.

21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.

Page 45 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 14 Last Revised: 01/11/2018

22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court.

23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement.

24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

Consultant Name: Van Scoyoc Associates,
Inc.

By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga

By:________________________________
Name Date _________________________________
Title
By: ______________________________
Name Date

______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga

By:________________________________
Name Date _________________________________
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)

Page 46 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 15 Last Revised: 01/11/2018

Approval ____ Buyer II, Purchasing
Alternate ____ Risk Management
Coordinator

Page 47 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 16 Last Revised: 01/11/2018

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Scope of Services – Federal Advocacy
The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks qualified consultants to represent its interests at the federal level, advocating before its congressional delegation, key Senate and House committees, federal agencies, and the Executive Branch. The selected consultant will support the City’s federal priorities by securing funding, monitoring legislation, building strategic relationships, and ensuring effective communication.

The Scope of Services shall include, but is not limited to, the following:

1. Federal Funding for City Priorities
Identify and pursue federal funding opportunities that align with the City’s priorities, including grants, appropriations, and other funding mechanisms. Assist City officials in identifying, preparing, and submitting grant applications to federal agencies, ensuring compliance with requirements, and maximizing competitiveness.
Advocate for federal funding by drafting and securing letters of support and endorsements from congressional representatives, relevant committees, and key stakeholders.
Provide strategic guidance on the organization, content, and formatting of funding requests, legislative materials, and advocacy documents. Monitor and facilitate the progress of funding applications through federal agencies and provide follow-up support.
Identify and advise on emerging funding opportunities, including discretionary grants, formula funding, and federal earmarks.

2. Federal Advocacy and Legislative Support
Develop and execute a federal advocacy strategy that advances the City’s priorities, ensuring alignment with legislative and administrative policies. Track and analyze federal legislation, regulatory changes, and budget proposals that may impact the City’s interests, providing recommendations on potential actions.
Advocate for or against proposed legislation, amendments, or regulatory changes that impact local governance and other City priorities. Engage with congressional representatives, committees, and federal agencies to promote City initiatives and influence policy decisions. Draft policy briefs, talking points, testimony, and correspondence for City officials as needed for congressional hearings, meetings, and advocacy efforts.

Page 48 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 17 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Support City officials in providing testimony before congressional committees or federal agencies when required.

3. Relationship Building and Strategic Engagement
Establish and maintain strong working relationships with the City’s congressional delegation, federal agencies, and key policymakers.
Identify and cultivate partnerships with industry associations, regional coalitions, and advocacy groups to strengthen the City’s federal engagement. Coordinate joint efforts with other municipalities, public agencies, and stakeholders pursuing similar federal policy objectives. Plan and facilitate City delegation visits to Washington, D.C., including scheduling meetings, preparing briefing materials, and ensuring effective engagement with federal officials.
Organize and support virtual or in-person meetings between City officials and federal decision-makers, including logistical coordination and strategy development.

4. Communications, Monitoring, and Reporting
Maintain ongoing communication with City staff to provide timely updates on federal activities, policy developments, and funding opportunities. Deliver monthly written updates and quarterly reports detailing advocacy efforts, legislative activities, and key outcomes.
Provide real-time alerts on federal legislation, regulatory changes, and funding opportunities that require immediate City action.
Develop and distribute memos, policy briefs, and informational bulletins on federal programs and policies affecting the City and its residents. Offer personalized briefings to City leadership and staff on federal matters of strategic importance.

5. Additional Support Services
Assist the City in responding to federal regulatory changes and compliance requirements affecting local government operations.
Provide insight and analysis on federal policies that impact local governance and other City priorities.

Page 49 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 18 Last Revised: 01/11/2018

EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE

Page 50 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 19 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
ADDENDUM NO.
to
Professional Services Agreement
Whereas;
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the “City”) intend to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”), and Whereas;
has identified the following exceptions to the Agreement;

Now therefore:
and the City desire to incorporate the above exceptions to the attached Professional Services Agreement.

Please indicate your agreement by way of signature to this Addendum No. and the attached Professional Services Agreement. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than . The City will process for signature and provide with one (1) fully executed copy of the Professional Services Agreement and Addendum No. .

Consultant Name:

By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga

By:________________________________
Name Date _________________________________
Title
By: ______________________________
Name Date

______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga

By:________________________________
Name Date _________________________________
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)

Page 51 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 20 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Attachment A – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
(Sample Only – Not all forms will look identical to this Sample)

Page 52 ends

PSA with professional liability insurance (Design) Page 21 Last Revised: 01/11/2018
Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured for On-going Projects

Page 53 ends

3 0
8 0
DATE:October 15, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager
Zack Neighbors, Building and Safety Director
Lori Price, Community Improvement Supervisor
SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement #2023-179 with Data Ticket Inc. to Expand the Scope of Services to Include Online Permitting Services, and to Increase the Contract Not-to-Exceed Amount by $225,000 from $725,000 to $950,000 to Fund the Additional Scope of Services for the Remaining Term of the Agreement, with Options to Renew for an Additional Two (2) Years. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Data Ticket Inc. to add online permitting services, increasing the contract not- to-exceed amount to $950,000, to the remaining term of the agreement, with an option to renew for an additional two (2) years.

BACKGROUND:

Since 2017, Data Ticket has been providing the City with citation processing services for parking and administrative violations. Their services support multiple City departments, including Animal Control Services, Business Licensing, Community Improvement, and the Police Department. The scope of Data Ticket services include citation collection, customer service, reporting and management of citation records, citation appeals and hearings, and comprehensive administration of the entire citation processing system. Data Ticket has consistently provided excellent service in meeting the City’s requirements for parking and administrative citation processing services.

ANALYSIS:

The proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Data Ticket includes implementation of an online permitting application that will streamline the City’s residential and guest parking permit processes.

The online permitting services will serve both the public and city staff. City residents will have the ability to register, apply for, and obtain parking permits through a user-friendly online portal.

The online permitting system will verify residency through integration with DMV records, ensuring that applicants reside within the designated permit zones. This verification step enhances the accuracy of the permit issuance process.

Through the online permitting services, City staff will be able to efficiently manage all aspects of the permitting process. The online permitting service will support the registration of all permit types, streamline the review and approval process, allow for secure documentation upload and generate comprehensive reports on permit activity. It will also provide integration with other

Page 54 ends

3 0
8 0
parking technology already in use by the city to enhance services to the public and provide improved metrics for parking operations staff.

Approval of this amendment will enable the City to implement online permitting services resulting in improved efficiency and significantly better service and convenience for the residents.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The existing agreement with Data Ticket for citation collections and processing is not-to-exceed $725,000 for the original contract term. The proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Data Ticket will add online permitting services, increasing the contract not-to-exceed amount to $950,000 for the term of the agreement, with options to renew for an additional two (2) years. The total costs associated with the online permitting services is contingent upon the volume of permits issued. The variable costs are included within the proposed contract amendment.

The Fiscal Year 2025/26 Adopted Budget includes funding for online permitting services. Note that revenues generated from parking and administrative citations offset expenditures for Data Ticket services. No additional appropriation is requested at this time. Adoption of the expanded scope of services will allow the city to eliminate the costs of the city’s current online permitting vendor which is not robust enough to meet long term needs.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

The accurate collection of fines and fees supports all aspects of the City Council’s vision and core values.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Data Ticket, Inc.

Attachment 2 – Amendment No. 2 Scope of Services

Page 55 ends

Last Revised: 11/27/2018 Page 1 of 1
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to
Professional Services Agreement (CO #2023-179)
between
(hereinafter “Contractor”)
and
City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the “City”)
This Amendment No. 1 will serve to amend the Prof essional Services Agreemen t (hereinafter “Agreement”), CO# 2023-179, to incorporate the following:

Section 1(Consultant's Services) Expand the Scope of Services to Include Online Permitting Services Section 3 (Compensation) Increase the Not-to-Exceed Amount by $225,000 from $725,000 to $950,000 All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#2023-179, will remain in full effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective au thorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return one (1 ) original signed copies to the City no later than October 9, 2025. The City will process both copies for signature and provide one (1) fully executed copy of Amendment.

By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By: _________________________________
Name Date _________________________________
Title
By: ______________________________
Name Date
______________________________
Title
By: _________________________________
Name Date _________________________________
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)
City of !Rancho Cucamonga
COINTH.ACT INUIMIBEIR
2023�179
Consultant Name: Data Ticket, Inc
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 56 ends

2603 Main Street, Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92614
O: 949-428-7241; F: 949-281-3195
www.ClientServices.com

8/4/2025
City of Rancho Cucamonga Permit Application Costs Cost per Instance Online Permit Application:

Online permit application to be used by the City and its Patrons to register for and obtain residential, commercial, guest, oversize, business, etc. parking permits. The online permit application can also be used by the City’s Personnel to manage the permitting process. Finally, in utilizing an Android Solution with Data Ticket’s proprietary parking citation software, the City’s ticket writers will have access to a daily file that includes all valid permits. When the issuing officer enters the license plate number, the handheld will indicate to the Officer whether the permit is valid or not.

The solution will provide the City’s Patrons with the following capabilities:
 Ability to register online and apply for permits
 Ability to verify resident address with DMV to ensure resident resides in permit area if applicable
 Ability to submit up to 3 documents online via the web to prove they are a resident (i.e., driver’s license, etc.) if applicable
 Provide online temporary permit with expiration date to be printed directly from patron’s computer
 Ability to create a login name and password to the solution with which the user may manage all future permits or to check out as a guest  Ability to pre-purchase permits for upcoming years
 Ability to re-use data previously entered to purchase new permits  Tracking of all permits purchased by residents/guests, etc.  Storage of all permit data online
 Acceptance of Visa, MasterCard, Discover and American Express  Live, bi-lingual customer service agents available M-F, 7:30am-5pm who will process registration requests, answer specific and general permit questions and provide fulfillment assistance
 Ability to set up automated payments for permits, monthly, annually, etc.

The Solution will provide the following capabilities to the City:
 Ability to register all permit types within the permit solution online  Ability to verify resident address with DMV to ensure resident resides in permit area – if applicable
 Ability to accept documentation & scan into the solution  Ability to generate reports on permits issued
 Ability to search for permits by resident
 Ability to modify permit holder information
 Online training of all City personnel
 Integration with LPR, Pay by Plate, etc. at no cost (Data Ticket will not pay any fees)
 Data Ticket to provide virtual demonstrations as we build the application to the City’s specifications at pivotal stages of development
$9,500.00/Annual
Fee – Per Permit
Type

$2,500.00 Initial fee
AND
$2,500.00/month
(regardless of the
number of permit
types)
.

Permit Fulfillment (if using hangtags/stickers) - Optional Services for the above-mentioned item includes:
 Assignment of each permit per successful registration  Generating and mailing a custom notice to each successful registrant with an assigned permit
 Includes Postage – USPS first class rate

$6.00 per permit
Fulfilled

And

$.85 per letter sent
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 57 ends

2603 Main Street, Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92614
O: 949-428-7241; F: 949-281-3195
www.ClientServices.com

8/4/2025
Permit Approval/Denial Process - Optional
 Approval or Denial of documents by Data Ticket
$7.00 per
approval/denial
Permits (if using hang tags/stickers) - Optional
 Cost of sticker permit – depending on size and quantity chosen TBD
Customer Service
 To be handled by Client
N/A
Additional Programming Time
 Applicable once the permit application has gone live and additional requests are made for enhancements, changes, etc.
$175.00 per hour
Email Blasts - Optional
 Generating and sending custom notification/information to prospective or active permit holders

$.75 per email
address/per email
In Trust/Escrow Account – Optional
Services for the above-mentioned item include:
 Daily deposits of funds to the Agency’s escrow account  Processing of all credit card charge-backs and Insufficient Funds  Month-end reconciliation of all funds collected
 Payment of Data Ticket’s invoice
 Disbursement of the net remittance to the Agency
 Scanning of checks/money orders directly to joint bank account daily using remote check deposit
The Agency will be responsible for the purchase of banking supplies, including checks and endorsement stamps; these fees typically run $200.00 per year.
$150.00/month
Banking Fees:

Data Ticket will pass all banking fees on to the City’s patrons who wish to pay by credit or debit card
$3.50 per
transaction
Refunds – For Agencies that opt for an Escrow/In Trust
Account:

Issuance of all refunds to individuals who are due a refund via 1st class mail $5.00 per issued
refund
Credit Card Charge Backs:

Processing of each chargeback

$33.50 per
chargeback

Page 58 ends

DATE: October 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Julie A. Sowles, Deputy City Manager-Community Programs Wess Garcia, Library Director
Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Paul A. Biane Library Second Floor Tenant Improvements for Exhibit Installation (Project). This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Government Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Accept the Paul A. Biane Library Second Floor Tenant Improvements for Exhibit Installation, Contract No. 2022-121 (Project), as complete;

2. Approve the final contract amount of $1,751,340;

3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond;

4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $1,499,989, six (6) months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received;

5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release the Project retention, 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and

6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one (1) year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship.

7. Increase the Paul A. Biane Library Second Floor Tenant Improvements for Exhibit Installation, Contract No. 2022-121 (Project) purchase order for the City’s in-field construction management firm, Aufbau Corporation, for an additional amount not to exceed $42,400.

Page 59 ends

Page 2 ends

3 0
2 9

8. Increase the Paul A. Biane Library Second Floor Tenant Improvements for Exhibit Installation, Contract No. 2022-121 (Project) purchase order for Lohgmani & Associates Design Group, Inc., for an additional amount not to exceed $53,720.

9. Authorize an appropriation in the amount of $96,120 from the Community Benefit Project Fund Balance to fund the above contracts.

BACKGROUND:

In 2018, a business plan for the Second Story and Beyond® (SSAB) Project (Project) outlined the costs associated with museum operations including visitor experience, exhibit concepts, a floorplan and a governance strategy. This included design development, tenant improvements to address sound attenuation, line management and fabrication and installation of exhibits.

In October 2020, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council entered into a contract with CambridgeSeven Associates to provide museum design services and contract administration service for the Project. The scope of work included design services for museum exhibits and the creation of two bid packages: one packet for architectural specifications for tenant Improvements, and another for custom interactive museum exhibit fabrication.

On September 21, 2022, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Loghmani & Associates Design Group, Inc., in the amount of $1,499,890 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $149,990 to address unforeseen construction related incidentals. A copy of the September 21, 2022, City Council staff report is on file with the City Clerk.

The scope of work for the Project consisted of sound attenuation through the addition of an enclosed entryway on the first floor of the library, the addition of acoustic panels to the stairwell, and north and south walls of the second-floor space along with additional wood subfloor. Plumbing and drains were installed to provide drainage for a large water table. A roll up door was added to two ancillary rooms and structural steel was installed and to support a glass climbing wall, platform climbing structure, and a climbing tube. A thematic lighting package was also installed to provide ambiance for specific themes and individual exhibits.

Work started on the tenant improvement in November 2022 to prepare the space while the custom exhibits were designed and fabricated. Exhibit installation followed the tenant improvements beginning in February 2024 with substantial completion of the tenant Improvements on May 24, 2024.

ANALYSIS:

The Project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A total of five (5) change orders were issued during construction, resulting in a net increase of $251,450 to the contract amount. A detailed description of each contract change order is on file with the City’s Library Department.

Due to the extended construction period, an additional $184,000 in construction Management was issued to Aufbau Corp. for on-call construction inspection and management services.

At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk will release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by the City Engineer.

Page 60 ends

Page 2 ends

3 0
2 9

Page 61 ends

Page 3 ends

3 0
2 9
Environmental Review:

The construction completed under the above-reference contract was determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Government Code Section 15301(c) “Existing Facilities” subsection (c), Class 1 – Existing Facilities.

FISCAL IMPACT:

A total of $2,103,460has been previously allocated for the construction phase of the project from the Community Benefit Project Fund (F030). The total funds for this Project were identified under Community Benefit Project Fund Account No. listed below:

Account No. Funding Source Description Amount
F030 CC610 SC7003
Community
Benefit Project
Fund (F030)
SSAB Tenant Improvements $2,103,460
Total Project Funding $2,103,460

The final project cost is $2,103,460 as shown below:

Expenditure Category Amount
Construction Contract $1,751,340
Construction Inspection Services $350,400
Bid Noticing Advertisement $1,720
Total Construction Costs $2,103,460
Staff is recommending the City Council approve an additional appropriation in the Community Benefit Project Fund (F030|CC610|SC7003) of $96,120 for the contract supplements included in the recommendation.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This project meets City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Tenant Space Improvements

Page 62 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Paul A. Biane Library Second Floor Tenant Improvements for Exhibit Installation

Page 63 ends

Page 64 ends

Page 65 ends

Page 66 ends

Page 67 ends

Page 68 ends

DATE: October 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer
Lelani Gnaster, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept Public Improvements for the San Sevaine Trail Project Constructed Under the Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Fontana for Cooperative Planning and Development of the San Sevaine Trail Project (Contract No. 17-029). (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council accept the improvements for the San Sevaine Trail Project constructed under Contract No. 17-029 (Project), as complete.

BACKGROUND:

In February 2017, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Fontana entered into a Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperative Planning and Development of the San Sevaine Trail (CO 17-029). The City of Fontana was the lead agency for the design, construction and funding of the Project which is considered Phase 1, Segment 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga provided support services such as plan review and inspection and is the responsible party for operation and maintenance of the trail for the portions within city limits.

The majority of the trail improvements are located within San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) right-of-way. A Memorandum of Understanding (CO 93-020) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SBCFCD was executed in January 1993 in which the City agreed to construct and maintain a multi-use trail system within portions of SBCFCD’s right-of-way. A Common Use Agreement (CO 09-087) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SBCFCD was executed in January 2010 to grant the City of Rancho Cucamonga permission to construct, operate, and maintain improvements within the District’s right-of-way. In April 2021, the Fifth Amendment to CO 09-087 was executed to include the San Sevaine Creek Trail in the Agreement.

On May 28, 2024, the City of Fontana issued the Notice to Proceed to H&H General Contractors Inc. Construction of the Project within city limits concluded on September 26, 2025.

ANALYSIS:

The trail segment in Rancho Cucamonga has been a long-time community vision outlined in the General Plan and Connect RC. Further, the City of Fontana adopted a master plan for the San Sevaine Trail a number of years ago with the goal to eventually connect to the Santa Ana River Trail near the Hidden Valley Wildlife Area in Riverside County. The recently constructed 1.25-mile multipurpose trail begins at the trail head entrance where the Pacific Electric Trail meets Phase

Page 69 ends

Page 2 ends

3 0
5 7
1, Segment 1 of the San Sevaine Trail in the City of Fontana. The new trail connection is located north of Baseline Avenue, extends through Rancho Cucamonga and ends at Banyan Street. The completed trail segment runs north and south along the Etiwanda Creek Channel and provide a healthy, scenic, and recreation alternative for pedestrians and bicyclists. Additionally, the trail segment serves to provide a connection between the residents of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. A vicinity map is included in Attachment 1.

The Project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of all applicable entities.

The City of Rancho Cucamonga will assume maintenance of the Project as outlined under the SBCFCD Agreement Amendment No.5 (CO 09-087) upon Project acceptance by the City of Fontana which is anticipated on October 28, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

A total of $607,820 was contributed by City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of the Project. The total funds for this Project were identified under Capital Improvement Project Account No.'s and in the amounts listed below:

Account No. Funding Source Description Amount
F110 CC303 SC5650
PID2112-110
Beautification Fund
(110)
San Sevaine Trail
Project $607,820
Total Funding $607,820
The City of Fontana secured grant funding in the amount of $11,181,820 and supplemented the remaining construction costs with local funding. The total Project construction cost was $16,989,640. The various funding sources are listed below:

Funding Type Description Amount
Recreational Trails
Program (RTP) Grant
Grant from the State of California
Department of Parks and Recreation $6,460,420
Mobile Source Air
Pollution Reduction
Review Committee
(MSRC) Grant
Grant from South Coast Air Quality
Management District $500,000
Carbon Reduction
Program (CRP) Grant Federal Grant $4,221,400
Local Funding City of Fontana Local Funds $5,200,000
Local Funding City of Rancho Cucamonga Local Funds $607,820 Total Funding $16,989,640
Costs related to the on-going maintenance of the trail will be added into the current operating budget for trail maintenance.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-quality public improvements.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map

Page 70 ends

San Sevaine Trail Segment 2 t 5
Project Site Plan
North Etiwanda Preserve
ak..
t

WILSON AVENUE
s r1r y1 hTKQ`d g
L,,
HghWdA"
BANYAN STREET Access Point
San Sevaine Trail
PROJECT AREA Crossing Chevy /
N YELLOW Avenue
companion Pr Oct
p. 1
Y
210 FREEWAY
214
Access Poi/
Undercrouling Lub
z
EIWANUA lei
HIGH t I w
i4
W
SCHOOL
z
r Park& Ride UpZ
ierj
W
Access Point) =

Q VICTORIA STREET
h
H
s
i.
141
RvPp`
PACIFIC ELECTRIC BIKE TRAIL t
y
7(
Acce
arking Lot
A
int)
NORTH
Victoria meet
BASELINE AVENUE PARK ®
San Sevaine it Crossingg
Victoria Street
LEGEND
I
Companion Project
City Boundary o cy
Powerline Easement r SanSevaineTrail
San Sevaine Channel
Existing San Sevolne
I
p
Trail
Proposed San
Sevaine Trail
I
z t o_ .
t =
Existing Class I Bike
Path
r a
Long Term Class I GARCIA
I
aPo< EBike Path PARK
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 71 ends

DATE: October 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director Trina Valdez, Utilities Operations Supervisor
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Attestation of Veracity for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 2024 Power Source Disclosure Annual Report and Power Content Label. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-081) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the attestation of veracity for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) 2024 Power Source Disclosure Annual Report and Power Content Label.

BACKGROUND:

In 1997, the California Legislature adopted Senate Bill 1305, Article 5, amended by Assembly Bill 162 (2009), requiring retail suppliers of electricity to disclose sources of energy being used to the California Energy Commission (CEC) and to consumers in the form of the Power Source Disclosure Annual Report and Annual Power Content Label.

The legislation also requires that the information used to calculate the Power Content Label for each calendar year be independently audited. In lieu of an independent audit and verification, an authorized agent of the City may submit to the CEC, under penalty of perjury, an attestation confirming the accuracy of the report. The CEC requires that the submission of the attestation be approved by the City Council at a public meeting.

ANALYSIS:

RCMU submitted the 2024 Power Source Disclosure Annual Report and Power Content Label (PCL) to the CEC on May 29, 2025, including the staff attestation, and provided the required information to its customers by posting the 2024 Power Content Label on the City’s website (https://www.CityofRC.us/RCMU). Approval of the attached resolution satisfies the statutory requirement for approval by the City Council.

In 2024, RCMU’s total power procurements and generation for retail sales came from four (4) sources: 42% of power was renewable procurements (solar and wind), 4% was large hydroelectric, and 55% was unspecified power. Unspecified power refers to electricity that has been purchased through open market transactions and is not traceable to a specific generation source.

Page 72 ends

Page 2 ends

3 0
5 9
As RCMU continues to move forward in increasing its procurement of renewable energy, RCMU will see renewable energy opportunities both regionally and locally. This power source diversity will allow RCMU to be more reliable and resilient by supporting renewable generation projects, as well as supporting goals addressed in the City’s Climate Action Plan, including the reduction in Greenhouse Gas emissions and the transition of the power grid to renewable sources.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s vision by ensuring compliance with state regulations and building on our success as a world class and sustainable community.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - 2024 PSD Report
Attachment 2 - Resolution

Page 73 ends

Version: April 2025
Submit the Annual Report and signed Attestation in PDF format with the Excel version of the Annual Report to [email protected]. Remember to complete the Retail Supplier Name and contact information above.

NOTE: Information submitted in this report is not automatically held confidential. If your company wishes the information submitted to be considered confidential an authorized representative must submit an application for confidential designation (CEC- California Energy Commission's website.

If you have questions, contact Power Source Disclosure (PSD) staff at [email protected] or (916) 639-0573.

TITLE Engagement and Special Programs Director
2024 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT
For the Year Ending December 31, 2024
Retail suppliers are required to use the posted template and are not allowed to make edits to this format. Please complete all requested information.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

RETAIL SUPPLIER NAME
City of Rancho Cucamonga

CONTACT INFORMATION
NAME Michael Parmer
EMAIL [email protected]

WEBSITE URL

FOR PCL

POSTING
https://www.cityofrc.us/rcmu
MAILING 10500 Civic Center Drive
CITY, STATE, ZIP Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
PHONE (909) 774-2006
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 74 ends

Annual Data City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Totals PCL Data Instructions: Retail Sales 120181

1. Enter the electricity portfolio name in cell O25 and additional electricity portfolio names as needed in cells P25-V25. Total Specified 54652

2. Enter information about all power procurements and retail sales. Insert additional rows as needed. All fields in white should be filled out. Fields in grey auto-populate as needed and should not be filled out. Biomass & Biogas 0 0%

3. For all specified purchases, enter the facility name, fuel type, state or province, WREGIS ID of REC source, RPS ID of REC source, EIA ID of delivered energy, gross MWhs procured, and specified resales MWhs. Geothermal 0 0%

4. For firmed-&-shaped procurements specifically, enter all fields from step 3. Additionally, enter the EIA ID of the substitute power in the "EIA ID of delivered energy" field and select "Yes" in the "Firmed-&-Shaped Resource?" field. If the associated GHG emissions are eligible for firmed-&-shaped grandfathering, select "Yes" in the relevant field. Eligible Hydroelectric 0 0%

5. Proxy EIA IDs for unspecified power and specified system mixes from asset-controlling suppliers have been provided. Enter "Unspecified Power", "BPA", or "Tacoma Power" as applicable. Solar 25185 21%

6. Proxy EIA IDs for aggregated reporting of WAPA CVP or PCIA resoures; Enter "CVP", "PCIA Solar", "PCIA Wind", "PCIA Eligible Hydro", or "PCIA Large Hydro" as applicable. Wind 25000 21%

7. Procurements of unspecified power must not be entered as line items below; unspecified power will be calculated automatically in the individual electricity portfolio tables to the right after all specified resources have been allocated. Large Hydroelectric 4467 4%

8. Allocate net MWhs procured to each electricity portfolio until the loads are balanced across each portfolio. If the total Net MWhs Procured exceeds the total retail sales of all portfolios, allocate only enough MWh to meet the retail sales of each portfolio. Nuclear 0 0% Emerging Technologies 0 0%
Other 0 0%
Natural Gas 0 0%
Coal & Petroleum 0 0%
Unspecified Power - ACS 0
Unspecified Power - Spot Market 65529
Unspecified Power - Total 65529 55%
Over allocation
check ✓ Total PCL GHGs (MT CO2e) 38746.4
Under allocation
check
✓ Emissions intensity (MT CO2e/MWh)

0.322
Coal check ✓ PCL GHG Intensity (lbs CO2e/MWh) 711
Negative
oversupply check ✓ Unbundled REC %
0%
Retail Sales 120181
Unmet Load
65529 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province

WREGIS ID
of REC
source
RPS ID of
REC
source
EIA ID of
delivered
energy
Gross
MWhs
Procured
Specified
Resales
MWhs
Net MWhs
Procured
Firmed &
Shaped
Resource?
Eligible for Firmed
& Shaped
Grandfathering?
Total EF
(MT
CO2e/MWh)
Total
GHGs
PCL EF
(MT
CO2e/MWh)
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Electricity Portfolio
#2 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#3 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#4 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#5 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#6 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#7 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#8 Name Remainder/Oversupply Facility Name Fuel Type Net Procurement Annual
PCL
GHGs
(MT CO2e)
Antelope Expansion 3B Solar CA W11436 64096A 62674 10900 10900 0.0000 0.0000 10900 Antelope Expansion 3B Solar 10900 0 RE Astoria 2 Solar CA W4931 62691A 59977 12688 12688 0.0000 0.0000 12688 RE Astoria 2 Solar 12688 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga - City Hall Solar CA W4859 63210A P222 76 76 0.0000 0.0000 76 City of Rancho Cucamonga - City Hall Solar 76 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Animal Center ShelterSolar CA W5017 63221A P223 415 415 0.0000 0.0000 415 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Animal Center ShelterSolar 415 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Epicenter Solar CA W5425 63220A P224 947 947 0.0000 0.0000 947 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Epicenter Solar 947 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Fire Station 173Solar CA W12547 64972A P378 107 107 0.0000 0.0000 107 City of Rancho Cucamonga - Fire Station 173Solar 107 0 Boulder Canyon Project Large Hydroelectric NV 466 4467 4467 0.0000 0.0000 4467 Boulder Canyon Project Large Hydroelectric 4467 0 Arrow Rancho LLC Solar CA W18633 65453A P412 52 52 0.0000 0.0000 52 Arrow Rancho LLC Solar 52 0 Tucannon River Wind Farm - Tucannon River 2Wind WA W4483 63027 Unspecified Power 10000 10000 Yes 0.4280 4280 0.4280 10000 Tucannon River Wind Farm - Tucannon River 2Wind 10000 4280 Tucannon River Wind Farm - Tucannon River 1Wind WA W4482 63027 Unspecified Power 15000 15000 Yes 0.4280 6420 0.4280 15000 Tucannon River Wind Farm - Tucannon River 1Wind 15000 6420 #N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0
#N/A #N/A #N/A - - - 0

Page 75 ends

RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS
Facility Name Fuel Type
State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)
Total Retired Unbundled RECs
Electricity Portfolio #1 Name

Page 76 ends

Net MWh Procured N/A Resource Type Resource Mix Factors Resource-Specific Procurements
from ACS
Biomass & biogas -
Geothermal -
Eligible hydroelectric -
Solar -
Wind -
Coal -
Large hydroelectric 0.84 -
Natural gas -
Nuclear 0.11 -
Other 0.01 -
Unspecified Power 0.04 -
Net MWh Procured N/A Resource Type Resource Mix Factors Resource-Specific Procurements
from ACS
Biomass & biogas -
Geothermal -
Eligible hydroelectric -
Solar -
Wind -
Coal -
Large hydroelectric 0.89 -
Natural gas -
Nuclear 0.06 -
Other -
Unspecified Power 0.06 -

ASSET CONTROLLING SUPPLIER RESOURCE MIX CALCULATOR
Bonneville Power Administration
Tacoma Power
Instructions: Enter total net specified procurement of ACS system resources into cell A8 or A23.

In Column E, the calculator will determine quantities of resource-specific net procurement for entry on Schedule 1.

Page 77 ends

2024 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT

ATTESTATION FORM
For the Year Ending December 31, 2024
City of Rancho Cucamonga
I, Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director, declare under penalty of perjury, that the information provided in this report is true and correct and that I, as an authorized agent of City of Rancho Cucamonga, have authority to submit this report on the retail supplier's behalf. I further declare that all of the electricity claimed as specified purchases as shown in this report was sold once and only once to retail customers.

Name: Michael Parmer
Representing (Retail Supplier): City of Rancho Cucamonga Signature: __________________________________________________________ Dated: 5/29/2025
Executed at: Rancho Cucamonga, CA

Page 78 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-081

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ATTESTATION OF VERACITY FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY 2024

POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT AND POWER

CONTENT LABEL
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) is a publicly -owned utility in the state of California and is therefore subject to Senate Bill 1305, as amended by Assembly Bill 162, requiring retail suppliers of electricity to disclose sources of energy being used to the California Energy Commission (CEC) and to consumers in the form of the Power Source Disclosure Annual Report and the Annual Power Content Label; and
WHEREAS, the 2024 Power Source Disclosure Annual Report and Annual Power Content Label has been submitted to the CEC, and the Annual Power Content Label has been posted on the City’s website for customers to review; and
WHEREAS, the 20 24 Power Source Disclosure Annual Report includes an attestation from an authorized agent of the City, under penalty of perjury, confirming the accuracy of the information provided.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY

RESOLVES,
Section 1.: The City Council hereby certifies the 20 24 Power Source Disclosure Program Report and Annual Power Content Label.

Section 2.: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 3.: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October 2025.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 79 ends

DATE: October 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director Hope Velarde, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-082, Appointing a Representative and Alternate Representative to the California Intergovernmental Risk Authority (CIRA) Board of Directors, and Predecessor Boards. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-082) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution, appointing the City Manager as the City's representative and appointing a Deputy City Manager as the City's alternate representative on the California Intergovernmental Risk Authority (CIRA) Board of Directors, and any predecessor boards.

BACKGROUND:

The California Intergovernmental Risk Authority (CIRA) is a joint powers authority that provides stable, cost-effective risk management and insurance services to public agencies across California. Its mission is to reduce and stabilize insurance costs while ensuring member agencies have access to essential coverage for critical services, such as general liability, employment practices, workers’ compensation, public safety, transportation, and infrastructure.

Established on July 1, 2021, CIRA was formed through the merger of two legacy insurance pools, PARSAC (Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California), and REMIF (Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund). The City, a longtime member of PARSAC, transitioned to CIRA as part of this merger. By combining the resources, membership, and risk pools of these entities, CIRA is able to leverage scale, strengthen financial stability, and deliver enhanced services to its members.

ANALYSIS:

The City Council previously approved Resolution 19-007, appointing the City Manager as the City’s representative and the Deputy City Manager of Civic and Cultural Services as the alternate representative on the Board of Directors of PARSAC (now known as CIRA).

Given the changes that have occurred since that resolution, it is necessary to provide CIRA with an updated and accurate record of the City’s representatives. Elisa Cox, the incoming City Manager, will serve as the City’s representative, and Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager, will serve as the alternate representative. Maintaining these positions is critical to ensure the City continues to have representation and voting rights on the CIRA Board, as well as any predecessor boards.

Page 80 ends

Page 2 ends

3 0
7 7
FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This appointment will address the City Council' s values of working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders by ensuring knowledgeable voting representation on self-funded insurance and risk sharing programs in which the City of Rancho Cucamonga participates.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution Appointing CIRA Reps

Page 81 ends

ATTACHMENT #1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-082

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPOINT A

REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE

CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK AUTHORITY (CIRA)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") is a party to the Joint Powers Agreement creating the California Intergovernmental Risk Authority (CIRA) and as such, is a Member Agency of CIRA; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement, each Member Agency of CIRA is required to appoint a Director and an Alternate Director to act in the Director's absence, to represent the City as if the City itself were present and acting on the CIRA Board of Directors for all matters which come before such Board of Directors, and also for the Director to be eligible to serve on the CIRA Executive Committee, and any predecessor boards.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga appoints the City Manager to serve as its Director on the CIRA Board of Directors to act on behalf of the City, a Member Agency of CIRA, on all matters to come before the Board of Directors, as if the City itself were present and acting at such meeting, and for such Director to be eligible for serving on the CIRA Executive Committee, and any predecessor boards; and appoints a Deputy City Manager to serve as Alternate Director in the absence of the Director.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 19 -0007, passed and adopted on February 6, 2019, appointing the City Manager as the City's representative to PARSAC (now known as CIRA) and the Deputy City Manager of Cultural Services as alternate, be rescinded; that the City Manager, or a designee, be instructed to inform the Secretary of CIRA of the above appointment by sending a copy of this Resolution to CIRA’s business office; and that this resolution shall take effect on December 16, 2025.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of __________2025.

Resolution No. 202X-XX Page 1 of 1

Page 82 ends

DATE: October 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager-Administrative Services SUBJECT: Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:

ORDINANCE NO. 1047

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.16.030 OF

THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO

SALARIES FOR MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1047 amending Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code pertaining to salaries for Mayor and Members of the City Council.

BACKGROUND:

The introduction and first reading of the above-entitled Ordinance was conducted at the Regular City Council Meeting of October 1, 2025. Votes at first reading: AYES: Michael, Kennedy, Hutchison, Scott, Stickler.

ANALYSIS:

Please refer to the October 1, 2025 City Council staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Please refer to the October 1, 2025 City Council staff report.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

Please refer to the October 1, 2025 City Council staff report.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Ordinance No. 1047

Page 83 ends

Ordinance No. 1047 - Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. 1047

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SECTION 2.16.030 OF THE RANCHO

CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO

SALARIES FOR MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE

CITY COUNCIL

The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:

A. RECITALS

1. California Government Code Section 36516 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
"(a) A City Council may enact an ordinance providing that each member of the City Council shall receive a salary."

2. Government Code subsection 36516( a)(4)(A) allows Council salaries to be increased by ordinance in an amount not to exceed 5% for each full calendar year from the operative date of the last Council salary adjustment.

3. Two full calendar years have elapsed since the effective date of the last Council salary adjustment which set the salary at $1,562 per month, effective as of December 2024. However, this Council intends to modify Council salaries; total compensation increases anticipated in the coming fiscal year, but not to exceed the limit of 5% for each calendar year for each of the past two full calendar years. ·

4. Government Code Section 36516.1 provides authority for a directly elected Mayor of a general law city to be provided with additional compensation.

B. ORDINANCE

IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Subsection A of Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:

"2.16.030 Salary amount and waiver.

"A. Each member of the City Council other than the Mayor shall receive as salary the sum of one thousand six hundred forty ($1,640) per month. The Mayor shall receive the sum of one thousand eight hundred eighteen dollars ($1,818) per month. The salary shall be paid at the same time and in the same manner as salaries are paid to other officers and employees of the City.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 84 ends

Ordinance No. 1047 - Page 2 of 3
Section 2. The salary increases provided for in this Ordinance shall become available to the members of this Council during December 2026.

Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in accordance with applicable law.

Page 85 ends

Ordinance No. 1047 - Page 3 of 3
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of October, 2025.

L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:

Kim Sevy, Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )

I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced - at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 1st day of October 2025, and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 15th day of October 2025.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED

Executed this 16th day of October 2025, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.

Kim Sevy, Clerk

Page 86 ends

DATE: October 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Kirt Coury, Contract Planner
Sean McPherson, AICP, Principal Planner
Sophia Serafin, AICP, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MASTER PLAN, DESIGN REVIEW, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT –
NEWCASTLE PARTNERS – A request for development of one industrial warehouse building totaling approximately 334,776 square feet on a

14.8-acre site located west of Etiwanda Avenue and south of Arrow Route at 12459 Arrow Route; APN 0229-131-24. An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2023110039) was prepared for the project.

Primary Case File No. DRC2022-00101. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-079) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Planning Department staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, make findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and adopt a resolution of approval for Master Plan DRC2024-00036, Design Review DRC2022-00101 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2025- 00203 subject to the included Conditions of Approval.

BACKGROUND:

On September 10, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed the subject project, which proposes one concrete tilt-up industrial building totaling approximately 334,776 square feet of building floor area to be located on property addressed 12459 Arrow Route, generally west of Etiwanda Avenue and south of Arrow Route. After deliberation and hearing public testimony, the Planning Commission voted in favor of the project and unanimously recommended the City Council approve the project as proposed. The September 10 Planning Commission staff report and meeting minutes are included with this staff report for reference as Attachment 4.

ANALYSIS:

Applications for the proposed project include a Design Review (DRC2022-00101) to allow the construction of the proposed building, a Master Plan (DRC2024-00036) wherein the developer is requesting site-specific development standards regarding reduced parking setbacks, landscaped setbacks, and reduced roadway standards, and a Conditional Use Permit (DRC2025-00203) to allow for the development of a warehouse facility in excess of 75,000 square feet.

The existing land use, General Plan, and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent

Page 87 ends

Page 2 ends

3 0
6 1
properties are as follows:

Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial
Warehouse
Industrial Employment
District Industrial Employment (IE)
North Industrial
Warehouse
Industrial Employment
District Industrial Employment (IE)
South Industrial Industrial Employment
District Industrial Employment (IE)
West Industrial Neo-Industrial Employment
District
Neo-Industrial (NI)
East Industrial Industrial Employment
District Industrial Employment (IE)
Project Design and Layout
The applicant is proposing to develop the site with one concrete tilt-up industrial building totaling 334,776 square feet of building floor area comprised of 322,776 square feet of industrial warehouse space. Access to the site is proposed via Arrow Route and Yellowwood Road, the latter of which will be required to be fully dedicated to the City. In addition, and consistent with the City’s block network standards, a new public road (labeled as “A Street” in the attached plan set), is proposed to be constructed. “A Street” will run parallel to the south property line of the project site, aligned east to west, and will connect Yellowwood Road and a new proposed north-south street identified along the eastern boundary of the project site (“B Street”). As a condition of approval, the developer will be required to construct each of these new streets to their full width pursuant to Engineering standards, with the exception of “B Street” for which the developer is proposing site-specific development standards through a Master Plan application. The project includes on-site circulation improvements, trailer parking areas, and substantial new landscaping.

All existing buildings and associated improvements will be demolished.

Page 88 ends

Page 3 ends

3 0
6 1
Figure 2: Project Site Plan
The proposed building will include 6,000 square feet of ground floor office space, and 6,000 square feet of mezzanine office space, and will have a maximum height of 45 feet.

Architecture and Site Design Theme
Both the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission have reviewed the project’s proposed architectural theme and site design and have provided general comments in support.

The proposed industrial warehouse buildings meet the City’s architectural design standards and provide an attractive design theme and color pallet largely consistent with other recent industrial development seen throughout the City.

Figure 3: Proposed Building Elevations
The proposed Project complies with the applicable development standards for the Industrial Employment (IE) zone, with the exception of those standards where the developer has proposed their own site-specific development standards through the master plan application, as shown in the table below:

Page 89 ends

Page 4 ends

3 0
6 1
Parking
As provided in the table below, the project meets all relevant parking standards pursuant to the Development Code:

The project will result in 178 onsite trees, including 22 new street trees and 21 replacement heritage trees. Ornamental ground cover and shrubs make up the balance of the landscaped area. A tree removal permit is required and has been noted as a condition of approval.

Street Side
Setback 25 feet (Street A) Building: 25 feet YES
Average Depth of
Landscape
35 feet ( Yellow Wood
Road and Streets A and
B)
15-10” feet Yellow Wood
Road; 25 feet Street A, and,
10’-10” feet Street B
YES*
Parking Setback
20 feet ( Yellow Wood
Road);
20 feet (Street B)
4’-8” feet ( Yellow Wood
Road);
4’-10” feet (Street B)
YES*
Interior Side Yard
Setback Min. 5 feet Building: 119 feet YES
Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet Building: 71 feet YES
Open
Space/Landscape
Standards
10% 12.5% YES
*The project applicant has requested to establish site specific development standards through the request of approval of a Master Plan.

Page 90 ends

Page 5 ends

3 0
6 1
Figure 4: Color Image of Proposed Building and Landscaping Related Entitlements
As noted, the project involves the processing other entitlements. In addition to the processing of a Design Review for the construction and development of proposed structure and infrastructure improvements, the application also involves a request to approve a Conditional Use Permit for the development of a warehouse facility in excess of 75,000 square feet (pursuant to Development Code Section 17.36.040(C)(table note 10), and a Master Plan wherein the developer proposes site-specific development standards.

Master Plan
As previously mentioned, this project site is within the Industrial Employment Zoning District which requires specific zoning and building standards, building, parking, and landscaping setbacks, floor area, landscaping, and land use standards. The applicant has applied for a Master Plan to establish site-specific development standards pursuant to Development Code Section 17.22.020 (Master Plan). The purpose of a Master Plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city to accomplish specific objectives including to allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zone or due to constraints of existing development standards.

In this case, the developer has proposed the construction of two new public streets (“A Street” and “B Street”) as required by the General Plan for the purposes of improving circulation within the Southeast Industrial Area of the City, which is specifically defined in the General Plan as Focus Area 8. While the expanded road network shown in the General Plan focus area achieves certain key priorities of strategic implementation for Focus Area 8, namely complete network connectivity and efficient goods movement, the dedication of these roads has caused site constraints which has led the developer to request that site-specific development standards be established through the Master Plan application related to reduced building, parking and landscaped setbacks, and a reduced ultimate right-of-way for “B Street” as detailed below:

Street City Standard
(Collector Street)
Proposed Deviation
Yellow
Wood Road
35' average depth of
landscaped and 20’
parking per IE zoning
Approx. 15'-10” average
landscaping and an
approximate 4’-8” parking
Landscaped setback
reduced from 35' to
approx. 15-10” and

Page 91 ends

Page 6 ends

3 0
6 1
setback parking setback
reduced from 20’ to 4’-
8”
Street A 35' landscaped and
building setback per IE
zoning
14’ landscaped setback
and 25 foot building
setback
Landscaped and
building setback
reduced from 35' to 14’
landscaped setback and
25’ building setback
Street B Street Standard 100-A
requires 66’ ROW
including 44’ wide curb-
to-curb and cumulative
22 feet of
parkway/sidewalk. 35'
landscaped setback per
IE zoning
50’ ROW, including 4-‘
curb-to-curb, a 6’ sidewalk
on the easterly portion
and 4’ raised curb on
westerly portion. No
landscaped parkway;
approx. 10'-10” average
landscaped setback and
4’-10” parking setback
Roadway reduced as
described and as
illustrated in “Figure 5”
Typical Street “B” Street
Section, below. average
landscaped setback
reduced from 35' to
approx. 10-10” and
parking setback
reduced from 20’ to 4’-
10”
Figure 5: Reduced road widths for “B” Street, a new proposed north-south street along the easterly property line of the project site.

Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.36.040, a minimum 35-foot landscaped setback is required along public street frontages for collector streets. Further, pursuant to Engineering Standards 100-A, industrial collector streets, of which Yellowwood Road “A Street” and “B Street” are defined, are required to provide a total right-of-way width of 66 feet, including a 44 foot curb-to-curb dimension with two 22 foot-wide travel lanes, and a cumulative 22 feet (11 feet on each side of the road deck) or parkway (5 feet) and sidewalk (6 feet).

The applicant’s proposed site-specific development standards include landscaping setbacks along Yellowwood Road, “A Street,” and “B Street” ranging from approximately 10’-10” to 25 feet, which is less than the 35-foot standard. The proposed parking setbacks also differ from the

Page 92 ends

Page 7 ends

3 0
6 1
standard collector street section for Yellow Wood Road and “B Street,” with a range from approximately 4’-8” to 4’10”, which is less than the 20-foot standard setback. Lastly, “B Street” proposes a 50’ ROW, including 40-foot curb-to-curb, a 6’ sidewalk on the easterly portion and 4’ raised curb on westerly portion and no landscaped parkway. Of the 40-foot curb-to-curb roadway width, “B Street” will provide one 22-foot travel lane and one 18-foot travel lane, which differ from Engineering Standard 100-A as described above.

Staff believes that these requested site-specific development standards are warranted, because the developer will dedicate and construct two new public roads to achieve the City’s goal of improving the roadway network and connectivity in the southeast industrial area of the City. The Planning Commission reviewed staff’s analysis of the master plan and concurred.

Environmental Assessment
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the project (SCH No. 2023110039). The EIR was circulated for public and agency comment and proper notification was provided in accordance with CEQA and CEQA Guidelines; with the public comment period commencing May 23, 2025 through July 8, 2025, after which the City prepared the Final EIR.

The Draft EIR and Final EIR are included via hyperlink to this staff report as Attachment 3. The EIR concludes that upon implementation of the project and all recommended mitigation measures, impacts associated with the project would remain less than significant. No significant and unavoidable impact was identified; thus it is determined that no Statement of Overriding Consideration is required to be adopted. Upon the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the City Council is also being asked to certify the project EIR, make findings in accordance with CEQA, and adopt the mitigation monitoring and reporting program in addition to the other project approvals.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the Project site when constructed and the City’s annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The proposed Project will allow for the development of a new warehouse facility to the benefit of the community job base and tax revenue. The Project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed Project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

The development of the project achieves the City Council’s Core Value of “Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future,” and “continuous improvement.” In addition to providing the City with a new industrial warehouse facility which will attract a quality tenant (or tenants), the project also significantly improves circulation in the southeast industrial area of the City, which is a stated goal of the General Plan. Further, the Project meets the development standards (with approval of the master plan) thus effectuating the goals and vision of the General Plan and Zoning Code as desired by the City Council.

Page 93 ends

Page 7 ends

3 0
6 1

Page 94 ends

Page 8 ends

3 0
6 1
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map and Aerial Location
Attachment 2 - Link to Project Plans
Attachment 3 - Link to CEQA Documents (Draft EIR with Appendices, Final EIR, Findings and MMRP)
Attachment 4 – Planning Commission Staff Report and Meeting Minutes Dated September 10, 2025
Attachment 5 – Planning Commission Resolution 2025-028
Attachment 6 - Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval

Page 95 ends

Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map and Aerial Location
Existing Conditions

Project Site
Eucalyptus StreetAvenue
Foothill Boulevard
Elm Avenue
4th Street
Arrow Route
Etiwanda Avenue
Approximate Project Boundaries

Page 96 ends

Attachment 2
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:

Architecture-Set-Newcastle

Page 97 ends

6 2
1 3
Attachment 3
Due to file size, this attachment can be accessed through the following link:

CEQA Documents

Page 98 ends

DATE:September 10, 2025
TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director
INITIATED BY: Kirt Coury, Contract Planner
Sean McPherson, AICP, Principal Planner
Sophia Serafin, AICP, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MASTER PLAN, DESIGN REVIEW, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – NEWCASTLE PARTNERS – A
request for development of one industrial warehouse building totaling approximately 334,776 square feet on a 14.8-acre site located west of Etiwanda Avenue and south of Arrow Route at 12459 Arrow Route; APN 0229-131-24. An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2023110039) was prepared for the project. Primary Case File No. DRC2022-00101.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, make findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve the resolution of approval for Master Plan DRC2024-00036, Design Review DRC2022-00101, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00203, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.

BACKGROUND:

The project site is occupied by an industrial facility consisting of two buildings, a 100-space surface parking lot with surrounding concrete/asphalt and gravel pavement, and sparse vegetation. The two buildings are approximately 157,221 sq ft and 20,000 sq ft, respectively, and are approximately 26 feet tall. At the time the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was published (November, 2023), the project site was used for manufacturing steel wire and steel wire products by Tree Island Wire Operations, which occurred onsite 24 hours per day. Similar manufacturing facilities have operated onsite since approximately 1975. All existing buildings and improvements are proposed to be demolished as part of this project.

Site Characteristics
The project site is located at 12459 Arrow Route and at its maximum extent is approximately 535 feet by 1,272 feet, or approximately 644,688 square feet (sq ft) in lot area (14.8 acres). The project site is generally elongated in an east to west direction with topography descending slightly from a north to south direction. The project site is bounded by existing industrial developments to the north and east, Yellowwood Place to the west, and an existing drainage basin also to the east, and industrial development to the south.

ATTACHMENT 4

Page 99 ends

Page 2 of 10 ends

3 0
1 6
Figure 1: Project Location
ANALYSIS:

The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Industrial Employment District. The project site is also zoned as Industrial Employment (IE). Surrounding land uses to the north, south and east and zoned IE, and to the west are zoned Neo-Industrial (NI).

The existing land use, General Plan, and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows:

Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site
Existing
industrial
buildings
Industrial Employment
District Industrial Employment (IE)
North Industrial
Warehouse
Industrial Employment
District Industrial Employment (IE)
South Industrial Industrial Employment
District Industrial Employment (IE)
West Industrial Neo-Industrial Employment
District
Neo-Industrial (NI)
East Industrial Industrial Employment
District Industrial Employment (IE)
Project Design and Layout
The applicant is proposing to develop the site with one concrete tilt-up industrial building totaling

Page 100 ends

Page 3 of 10 ends

3 0
1 6
334,776 square feet of building floor area comprised of 322,776 square feet of industrial warehouse space with the remaining 12,000 square feet dedicated to office space. Access to the site is proposed via Arrow Route and Yellowwood Place, the latter of which will be required as a condition of approval to be fully dedicated to the City. In addition, and consistent with the City’s block network standards, new public road (labeled as “A Street” in the attached plan set), is proposed to be constructed. “A Street” will run parallel to the south property line of the project site, aligned east to west, and will connect Yellowwood Place and a new proposed north-south street identified along the eastern boundary of the project site (“B Street”). As a condition of approval, the developer will be required to construct each of these new streets to their full width pursuant to Engineering standards, with the exception of “B Street” for which the developer is proposing site specific development standards through a Master Plan application. The project includes on-site circulation improvements, trailer parking areas, and substantial new landscaping.

All existing buildings and associated improvements will be demolished.

Figure 2: Project Site Plan
The proposed building will include 6,000 square feet of ground floor office space, and 6,000 square feet of mezzanine office space, and will have a maximum height of 45 feet.

Architecture and Site Design Theme
The proposed industrial warehouse buildings meet the City’s architectural design standards. The building provides well-defined articulation and a varied use of architectural features creating an attractive aesthetic. For example, the long span of each façade along the north and south elevations provides a well-articulated wall plane. Further, the street facing corner of the building (fronting Yellowwood Place and “A Street”) provides an office tower element which exhibits vertical glass and a metal canopy accent feature. These corner elements also provide an aluminum storefront system framed by an aluminum panel cornice. Throughout each elevation, the typical concrete tilt-up façade is punctuated by panel joints, reveals and windows. The project also provides an attractive and varied color pallet to break up the expanse of the façade which

Page 101 ends

Page 4 of 10 ends

3 0
1 6
includes “Repose Gray” (Sherwin Williams SW 7015), “Dorian Gray” (SW 7017), “Gauntlet Gray” (SW 7019).

Figure 3: Proposed Building Elevations
The proposed Project complies with the applicable development standards for the Industrial Employment (IE) district as shown in the table below:

Development
Standard Required Proposed Complies?
Building Height
Maximum 35 feet (at front
setback) and
75 feet (1-foot increment
from the front setback
line)
Building: 45 feet YES
Floor Area Ratio
(FAR) 50-60% Building: 51.9% YES
Front Building
Setback
25 feet (Yellowwood
Place) Building: 71 feet YES
Street Side
Setback 25 feet (Street A) Building: 25 feet YES
Average Depth of
Landscape
35 feet (Yellowwood
Place and Streets A and
B)
15-10” feet Yellowwood
Place;
25 feet Street A, and, 10’-10”
feet Street B
YES*
Parking Setback
20 feet (Yellowwood
Place;
20 feet (Street B)
4’-8” feet (Yellowwood Place);
4’-10” feet (Street B) YES*
Interior Side Yard
Setback Min. 5 feet Building: 119 feet YES

Page 102 ends

Page 5 of 10 ends

3 0
1 6
Parking
Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, 17.64.090 and Table 17.64.050-1, auto parking for warehouse/storage uses is based on a tiered ratio as illustrated in the table below. In addition, office areas require parking at 1 stall per 250 square feet. Further, the development code requires 1 trailer loading stall for each dock door proposed. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 149 auto parking stalls and 44 trailer loading. The table below demonstrates the project’s compliance with all parking standards:

Parking Ratio Required
Parking
Provided
Parking Complies?
Warehouse/storage
and office
1 per 1,000 sf for the
first 20,000 sf; 1 per
2,000 sf for the next
20,000 sf, and 1 per
40,000 sf for remaining
sf
Office requires 1 per 250
sf
Building:
469 stalls
Building:
478 YES
Trailer Loading
Stalls 1 per loading dock Building:
44 Building:
44 YES
Landscaping
The project also meets all relevant landscape standards, with the exception of certain landscape setback standards for which the applicant has requested to establish site-specific development standards through the Master Plan application. The project will result in the removal of 2 non- heritage trees and 21 heritage trees. None of the existing heritage trees will remain in place. The project will result in 178 onsite trees, including 22 new street trees and 21 replacement heritage trees. Ornamental ground cover and shrubs make up the balance of the landscaped area. A tree removal permit is required and has been noted as a condition of approval.

Rear Yard
Setback Min. 0 feet Building: 71 feet YES
Open
Space/Landscape
Standards
10% 12.5% YES
*The project applicant has requested to establish site specific development standards through the request of approval of a Master Plan.

Page 103 ends

Page 6 of 10 ends

3 0
1 6
Figure 4: Color Image of Proposed Building and Landscaping Related Entitlements
As noted, the Project involves the processing multiple entitlements. In addition to the processing of a Design Review for the construction and development of proposed structure and infrastructure improvements, the application also involves a request to approve a Conditional Use Permit for the development of a warehouse facility in excess of 75,000 square feet (pursuant to Development Code Section 17.36.040(C)(table note 10), and a Master Plan application to allow the establishment of site-specific development standards for roadway width and landscaping and parking setbacks. Resolutions further describing each of these entitlements are included as exhibits to this staff report.

In this case, the developer has proposed the construction of two new public streets (“A Street” and “B Street”) as required by the General Plan for the purposes of improving circulation within the Southeast Industrial Area of the City, which is specifically defined in the General Plan as “Focus Area 8.” While the expanded road network proposed by the applicant achieves certain key priorities of strategic implementation for Focus Area 8, namely complete network connectivity and efficient goods movement, site constraints have led the developer to request that site-specific development standards be established through the Master Plan application related to reduced building, parking and landscaped setbacks, and a reduced ultimate right-of-way for “B Street” as detailed below:

Page 104 ends

Page 7 of 10 ends

3 0
1 6
Street City Standard
(Collector Street)
Proposed Deviation
Yellowwood
Road
35' average depth of
landscaped and 20’
parking per IE zoning
Approx. 15'-10”
landscaping setback and
an 4’-8” parking setback
Landscaped setback
reduced from 35' to
approx. 15-10” and
parking setback
reduced from 20’ to 4’-
8”
Street A 35' landscaped and
building setback per IE
zoning
14’ landscaped setback
and 25 foot building
setback
Landscaped and
building setback
reduced from 35' to 14’
landscaped setback and
25’ building setback.

Street B Street Standard 100-A
requires 66’ ROW
including 44’ wide curb-
to-curb and cumulative
22 feet of
parkway/sidewalk. 35'
landscaped setback per
IE zoning
50’ ROW, including 4-‘
curb-to-curb, a 6’ sidewalk
on the easterly portion
and 4’ raised curb on
westerly portion. No
landscaped parkway;
approx. 10'-10” average
landscaped setback and
4’-10” parking setback
Roadway reduced as
described and as
illustrated in “Figure 5”
Typical Street “B” Street
Section, below. average
landscaped setback
reduced from 35' to
approx. 10-10” and
parking setback
reduced from 20’ to 4’-
10”
Figure 5 – Typical Section “B” Street.

Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.36.040 (IE Zone Development Standards), a minimum 35-foot landscaped setback is required along public street frontages for collector streets. Further, pursuant to Engineering Standards 100-A, industrial collector streets, of which Yellowwood Place, “A Street” and “B Street” are defined, are required to provide a total

Page 105 ends

Page 8 of 10 ends

3 0
1 6
right-of-way width of 66 feet, including a 44 foot curb-to-curb dimension, including two 22 foot- wide travel lanes, and a cumulative 22 feet (11 feet on each side of the road deck) or parkway (5 feet) and sidewalk (6 feet).

The applicant’s proposed site-specific development standards include landscaping setbacks along Yellowwood Place, “A Street,” and “B Street” ranging from approximately 10’-10” to 25 feet, which is less than the 35-foot standard. The proposed parking setbacks also differ from the standard collector street section for Yellowwood Place and “B Street,” with a range from approximately 4’-8” to 4’10”, which is less than the 20-foot standard setback. Lastly, “B Street” proposes a 50’ ROW, including 40-foot curb-to-curb, a 6’ sidewalk on the easterly portion and 4’ raised curb on westerly portion and no landscaped parkway. Of the 40-foot curb-to-curb roadway width, “B Street” will provide one 22-foot travel lane and one 18-foot travel lane, which differ from Engineering Standard 100-A as described above.

Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.22.020, Master Plans are required to be reviewed by the City Council, thus in this case staff is requesting that the Planning Commission make a recommendation that the City Council approve the requested Master Plan and site-specific development standards.

Design Review Committee
The Project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC – Daniels and Boling) on September 3, 2024. Staff presented the item to the Design Review Committee. Following the staff’s presentation, members of the applicant’s team (including their architect), provided additional background and detail on the project. Following the presentation discussion ensued over various aspects of the project.

The Committee was complimentary of the project plan, architecture, and layout of the proposed project. The Committee further expressed their appreciation of the proposed project development as the design appeared to be respectful of the area and surrounding developments.

The Committee had questions for the applicant relating to the slopes of the property along the project northern property line and how the slope would be managed (retaining wall, landscaping, etc.). The Committee additionally asked general questions relating to the project landscaping and lighting. The architect discussed the use of a small retaining wall or large curb for that area along the project boundary to address the mentioned slope. The Committee also discussed the project architecture and was complimentary of the use of tile, glass, scoring, etc. of the building. The architect also noted the use of LED lighting within the tile popouts of the building. In addition, the Committee asked questions relating to the truck traffic and street improvements for the site and area. Lastly, the Committee asked about the internal ceiling height of the proposed building. It was noted that the height would be approximately 36-feet in height. The Committee was complimentary of the project and recommended that the project be forward as presented to the Planning Commission for their review.

Public Art
The project is subject to the public art requirement provided in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. As an industrial development, this project would typically include artwork that has a minimum value that meets or exceeds one dollar per square foot. The valuation of public art would be approximately $334,776 (as it is based on building square footage of the project). A condition has been included pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement be fulfilled prior to occupancy.

Page 106 ends

Page 9 of 10 ends

3 0
1 6
Environmental Analysis
Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No.2023110039), has been prepared for this project. Under CEQA, the purpose of an EIR is to inform the public about any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from a project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public participation. This EIR addressed and evaluated potentially significant impacts of the proposed project and identified feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce or eliminate these impacts. A summary of all of the project-related impacts and the recommended mitigation measures is provided in the Final EIR.

Draft EIR Preparation and Circulation
Following the NOP and Public Scoping Meeting, a DEIR was prepared and was distributed to Responsible and Trustee agencies, and individuals who had requested to review the DEIR. The DEIR was distributed for a 45-day public review period on May 23, 2025 with the comment period concluding on July 8, 2025. A Notice of Availability including electronic links to the DEIR and all technical appendices was posted at the County, published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, mailed to all property owners within 660 feet, interested parties requesting such notification and posted on the city’s website on May 23, 2025. Further, and also on May 23, 2025, the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (formerly the Office of Planning and Research – OPR) via the online “CEQAnet” portal for distribution to Responsible and Trustee agencies and hard copies of the DEIR and all technical appendices were provided for public review at the following locations:
Archibald Library – 7368 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730; Paul A Biane Library – 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739; Planning Department Public Counter at City Hall – 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730.

Comments were received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) on the content of the Draft EIR. None of the comments received, or the responses provided, constitute “significant new information” by CEQA standards (State CEQA Guidelines CCR Section 15088.5). In other words, no new significant impacts or other conditions set forth in Section 15088.5(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines were identified.

Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP)
In compliance with CEQA, a monitoring program has been prepared. The MMRP is a reporting program that identifies each adopted mitigation measure or project design feature that reduces the significance level of a particular impact. The MMRP indicates responsibility and timing milestones for each mitigation measure.

Findings of Fact in Support of Determinations Related to Significant Environmental Impacts The EIR concludes that upon implementation of the project and all recommended mitigation measures, impacts associated with the project would remain less than significant. No significant and unavoidable impact was identified; thus, it is determined that no Statement of Overriding Consideration is required to be adopted. Findings as required by CEQA are also included within the FEIR for public review.

Correspondence
This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland

Page 107 ends

Page 10 of 10 ends

3 0
1 6
Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on August 26, 2025, the property was posted on August 27, 2025, and notices were mailed to 35 property owners within a 1,500-foot radius of the Project site, as well as all parties that requested notice on August 27, 2025. To date, Staff has not received any comments from the public.

FISCAL IMPACT:

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUES(S) ADDRESSED:

The development of the project achieves the City Council’s Core Value of “Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future,” and “continuous improvement.” In addition to providing the City with a new industrial warehouse facility which will attract a quality tenant (or tenants). Further, the Project meets the development standards (with approval of the master plan) thus effectuating the goals and vision of the General Plan and Zoning Code as desired by the City Council.

EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A – Vicinity Map and Aerial Location
Exhibit B – Link to Project Plans
Exhibit C – Link to CEQA Documents (Draft EIR with Appendices, Final EIR, Findings and MMRP) Exhibit D – DRC Comments and Minutes Dated September 3, 2024 Exhibit E – Draft Resolution 2025-028 with Conditions of Approval

Page 108 ends

HPC/PC Minutes

Page 1 of 7 ends

Historic Preservation Commission and
Planning Commission
Agenda
September 10, 2025
Final Minutes
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
7:00 p.m.

The regular joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission was held on September 10, 2025. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Morales at 7:00 p.m.

A. Roll Call

Planning Commission present: Chairman Morales, Vice Chairman Boling, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Daniels and Commissioner Diaz.

Staff Present: Serita Young, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Nakamura, Planning Director; Sean McPherson, Principal Planner; Stacy Lee, Assistant Planner; Sophia Serafin, Assistant Planner; Kirt Coury, Contract Planner; Matt Marquez, Economic Development Director; Tanya Spiegel, Deputy Director of Economic Development; Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II, Carina Campos, Management Analyst II; Eddie Flores, Management Analyst I; Miguel Sotomayor, Principal Engineer; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant.

B. Public Communications

Chairman Morales opened the public communications.

Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public communications.

C. Consent Calendar

C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of August 27, 2025.

Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz; seconded by Vice Chairman Boling . Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.

D. Public Hearings

D1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – TAYLOR KANE ON BEHALF OF 8700 WHITE OAK APG LLC – A request to permit Large E -Commerce Distribution/Fulfillment Center and Medium Wholesale and Distribution uses for an existing 72,051- square-foot industrial building within the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zone, located at 8700 White Oak Avenue; APN: 0209- 145-04. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Section 15301 – Existing Facilities (DRC2025-00117).

Page 109 ends

HPC/PC Minutes

Page 2 of 7 ends

Assistant Planner Lee provided a P owerPoint presentation (copy on file). She noted in the presentation that there was a minor revision to the table that incorrectly listed Auto and Vehicle Sales and Rental as the current use of the site. She reiterated that the site is currently vacant, and the previous use was industrial. Commissioners received a redlined version of the changes on the dais for review.

Commissioner Dopp requested clarification on whether Auto and /Vehicle Sales and Rental are currently part of the permitted uses or conditional uses under warehouse distribution.

Planning Director Nakamura clarified that the use is not part of the current request . It was inadvertently left in and was a typographical error.

Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.

Applicant Kane was present and available to answer questions.

Vice Chairman Boling asked the applicant when was the building vacated from previous use.

Applicant Kane responded end of May 2025.

Vice Chairman Boling asked if it is currently being marketed for lease.

Applicant Kane confirmed.

Vice Chairman Boling asked whether the use it is being marketed for is included under the proposed uses if the Conditional Use Permit were to move forward.

Applicant Kane confirmed.

Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing.

Commissioner Dopp stated that he had no objections, noting that while a nearby property owner had expressed concerns about traffic and parking, those issues were addressed in the conditions; therefore, he is in support of it moving forward.

Commissioner Daniels commended the applicant for being proactive in getting the conditional use permit before it is necessary, making it much easier for the applicant and the city.

Vice Chairman Boling expressed his appreciation of the applicant coming forward and getting ahead of any issues and concerns. In the conditions of approval, Planning Condition #7, there is a reference to a condition related to recordation of state sales and use taxes to the property if such a tenant comes in. He strongly encouraged the owner to include that language in any potential lease agreements with tenants so the city does not lose out on potential sales and use tax that should be due to the city.

Chairman Morales thanked the applicant for working with staff to get the proper things done and for the public’s participation.

Motion: Moved by Commissioner Daniels; seconded by Commissioner Diaz to adopt Resolution 2025-027 approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00117. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.

Page 110 ends

HPC/PC Minutes

Page 3 of 7 ends

D2. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW – JONATHAN L. ZANE ARCHITECTURE – A request for site plan and design review of a 4,570 square foot residence with a 781 square foot garage and 519 square foot guest house on a vacant 0.6- acre lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential zone and Hillside and Equestrian Overlays at 8930 Reales Street, APN: 1061-801-16. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures (DRC2023-00368).

Assistant Planner Serafin provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).

Commissioner Dopp reiterated that it is expected that the applicant will fund for the trail improvements and that the project will resemble the other equestrian trails in the area.

Assistant Planner Serafin confirmed.

Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.

Applicant Zane was present and available to answer questions.

Hearing no comments from the public, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing.

Commissioner Dopp thanked the applicant for bringing this proposal forward , stating that it is appropriate for that type of neighborhood. He noted that the requested accommodations related to earthwork were due to the steep topography of the site, deeming the request necessary for the project to proceed.

Commissioner Diaz expressed that the proposed home is beautiful and shared excitement for both the applicant and the neighborhood, noting that the development of this infill lot will bring a new neighbor to the community.

Vice Chairman Boling mentioned that often times the commission is presented with projects that can be very controversial (i.e., higher density then what the neighborhood would prefer). He said it is nice to see a project like this that fits within the existing neighborhood.

Chairman Morales expressed his approval of developing the vacant site in a way that complements the neighborhood.

Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Boling; seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adopt Resolution 2025-026 approving Hillside Design Review DRC2023-00368. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.

D3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, MASTER PLAN, DESIGN REVIEW, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – NEWCASTLE PARTNERS – A request for development of one industrial warehouse building totaling approximately 334,776 square feet on a 14.8- acre site located west of Etiwanda A venue and south of Arrow Route at 12459 Arrow Route; APN 0229 - 131-24. An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2023110039) was prepared for the project.

Primary Case File No. DRC2022-00101.

Contract Planner Coury provided a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).

Principal Planner McPherson noted that this item will go before City Council for approval.

Co-Applicant Smith was in attendance and available to answer questions.

Vice Chairman Boling asked what the interior ceiling height is.

Page 111 ends

HPC/PC Minutes

Page 4 of 7 ends

Applicant Smith answered the interior ceiling height is 36 feet.

Commissioner Diaz inquired about plans for Public Art and expressed her hope that a mural would be included.

Applicant Smith answered that they would try to do something artful.

Chairman Morales opened the public hearing.

The following individuals from local union groups expressed their support: Jose Garcia, Jerry Davalos, Jorge Zavala, Godfrey Wachira, David Hanson.

Their comments included the following:
• Work close to home
• Prevailing wages
• Put union people to work

For the record, it is noted that the following correspondence was received after the preparation of the agenda packet and the following comment is noted. The actual correspondence should be referred to for details:
• Email from Ruben Castaneda expressing support for the project.

Hearing no other comments, Chairman Morales closed the public hearing.

Commissioner Dopp s tated that in terms of the design, it is consistent with high quality warehouses seen in the past. He said there are no major problems with the request for the revised reduced setbacks through the master plan, it appears routine for industrial areas to allow for some of these exceptions on that level. He said r egarding warehouse use, he wants to be consistent from past projects, usually, he is more critical of warehousing in the region. What Commissioner Dopp is usually looking for is 1) If it is harmful to residents, and 2) A desire for manufacturing. For this project, it does not appear harmful to residents since this is an industrial area and his hope is that the applicant f inds a smaller scale manufacturer since, in his opinion, it is almost all warehouses in that part of town. He has no objection on that front.

Commissioner Daniels complimented the architecture, noting that it integrates well with the surrounding buildings in the area. He expressed appreciation for the color scheme, stating that the elements work well together. He also indicated he has no concerns with the landscaping setback waivers due to the site’s location and expressed overall support for the project.

Commissioner Diaz expressed her support for the project. She thanked the public, especially the union labor workers, for attending on their own time and sharing their positive feedback and highlighting the many benefits the project will bring to the city.

Vice Chairman Boling stated the design not only fits in with the surrounding buildings, but it is uplifting on what is to be expected in future projects in that area. He a ppreciated the design elements included in the building. He said the ceiling height is important for future tenants to have a useful space and having the high ceiling will help with the warehouse and logistics distribution that could take place there. He said as it pertains to the Master Plan that is being recommended to City Council, there were a couple site specific development standards that have been brought up particularly on B Street and then the parking and landscape setbacks. He confirmed with staff that if approved, neither of those would impact the future project to the south because they would utilize similar standards so that way there is consistency as you move north to south.

Page 112 ends

HPC/PC Minutes

Page 5 of 7 ends

Principal Planner McPherson confirmed.

Chairman Morales commended the applicant for securing strong union support, which is impressive, emphasizing that the support was clearly expressed for the right reasons.

Motion: Moved by Commissioner Dopp; seconded by Commissioner Daniels to adopt Resolution 2025-028 approving Design Review DRC2022-00101, Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00203 and Master Plan DRC2024- 00036 with recommendation to the City Council. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.

E. General Business

E1. Consideration to Receive and File the Economic Development Strategy Annual Progress Report for 2024-2025.

Economic Development Director Marquez and introduced his team; Tanya Spiegel, Flavio Nunez, Carino Campos, and new member Eddie Flores.

The team presented a PowerPoint highlighting the City’s economic growth and increasing diversity.

Vice Chairman Boling commended the team for their outstanding work, noting that despite being a relatively small staff , they effectively promote the city, the region and the organization on a national level.

General Comments:
• Page 12 of the report under Historic Resources – being the Historic Preservation Commission they still have not received a list of the City’s recognized national state or local historic assets and sites. He hopes that they will receive it soon. • Positive feedback on adding Economic Development related items to the email newsletters that get sent out to the residents. It helps keeps them informed and promotes local businesses and highlights that you are not just focused on bringing new businesses in, but you also have the task of business retention and business growth.
• Photos in the report are great to highlight local businesses but unless you are familiar with that business, you do not know who it is or where it is. He suggested adding something on the graphic to identify and showcase the business a bit more. • Expressed appreciation for the update and seeing the many actions that have been taken previously by the Planning Commission help to implement the strategies and goals of Economic Development.

Commissioner Dopp expressed his appreciation for the presentation, noting that it was encouraging to see the well-organized programs being implemented.

General Comments:
• Job Board for the local communities peaked his interest. It is nice to have a more connected network.
• Epic Center - likes the idea of bringing in the market night. E xamples of community events; Smorgasbord LA or 626 Night Market might be good starting points to see if they do well.

He asked about the types of strategies and innovative uses being considered for potential opportunities in these areas beyond traditional warehouse functions.

Page 113 ends

HPC/PC Minutes

Page 6 of 7 ends

Economic Development Director Marquez replied that they are lucky they did not go overboard with their reliance on warehousing and distribution type of use as things have changed with the administration in the White House. They are starting to see cities that have relied too heavily on those types of uses are starting to feel the pinch and are seeing vacancy rates go up. He said regarding manufacturing; they are in a good spot to attract manufacturers. They have had conversations with existing manufacturers looking to expand. He said bringing in additional team members will help bolster their team. A lot of their focus has been on recruiting new retailers, restaurants and supermarkets. Moving forward, their focus will shift on new manufacturing type uses.

Commissioner Daniels commended the team for doing such a great job with programs and activities.

Commissioner Diaz asked if Economic Development has their own Instagram page.

Deputy Director of Economic Development Spiegel responded that they do not , they work in partnership with the city.

Commissioner Diaz stated that a lot of people are on social media, and it is great to see the new things happening in the city. She said the highlights on the city’s social media is a reminder of places we may have forgotten about or have not been for a while. The report also highlighted a lot of potential the city has to offer, and it is nice to see what is coming into the city. She especially liked the focus on Live, Work, Play and how the Job Board can be used if someone wants to work close to home.

Chairman Morales acknowledged that we are currently under uncertain and challenging economic times. He noted that several other Inland Empire cities without a diversified economy are now struggling, and it is sad to see. He expressed appreciation for the Economic Development teams efforts in maintaining a strong, diversified, and well-planned economy, emphasizing that this approach will help the city remain resilient during uncertain times. He also mentioned that he enjoys reading the newsletters.

With no other comments, Commission received and filed report.

F. Commission Business

F1. Discussion of State Density Bonus Law.

Commissioner Daniels stated that he did not have much to add to the letter from the meeting a few weeks ago. He added the comments he received except for the comment Vice Chairman Boling brought up regarding the timeframe of when the project is deemed complete. It was not in the nature of what was being discussed with the density bonus. He suggested to possibly have a meeting/workshop with City Council on this specific issue instead of having them read about that in this letter.

Planning Director Nakamura answered that we could either include that in a general transmittal or include the transmittal with the letter being attached. She mentioned they may hear Council say, yes, we hear you and understand, but we do not have any other options right now and it may not result with any action.

Chairman Morales suggested incorporating “Request for Legislative Reform” into the title

It was decided that Commissioner Daniels would revise the title and forward to City Council.

Page 114 ends

HPC/PC Minutes

Page 7 of 7 ends

Commission took a formal vote. Moved by: Commissioner Daniels; seconded by Commission Diaz. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.

G. Director Announcements

Planning Director Nakamura announced that a meeting will be held in two weeks and noted that several agenda items are backing up, indicating a likely busy calendar for the remainder of the year.

H. Commission Announcements

Commissioner Daniels mentioned that he would be unable to attend the Design Review Committee meeting on September 16
th but expects to return in time for the next scheduled meeting.

Chairman Morales requested a review of the Design Review Committee meeting attendance and suggested considering a process that would allow any commissioner to attend when multiple committee members are absent to ensure business proceeds on schedule.

Planning Director Nakamura confirmed that it could be brought up on a future agenda.

I. Adjournment

Motion: Moved by Commissioner Diaz , seconded by Commissioner Dopp to adjourn the meeting. Hearing no objections, Chairman Morales adjourned the meeting at 8:55 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant
Planning Department

Approved: HPC/PC September 24, 2025 Meeting.

Page 115 ends

ATTACHMENT 5

Page 116 ends

Page 117 ends

Page 118 ends

Page 119 ends

Page 120 ends

Page 121 ends

Page 122 ends

Page 123 ends

Page 124 ends

Page 125 ends

Page 126 ends

Page 127 ends

Page 128 ends

Page 129 ends

Page 130 ends

Page 131 ends

Page 132 ends

Page 133 ends

Page 134 ends

Page 135 ends

Page 136 ends

Page 137 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MASTER
LAN (DRC2024-00036), DESIGN REVIEW (DRC2022-00101), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (DRC2025-00203), AND MASTER
PLAN DRC2024-00036 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ONE

INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING TOTALING
APPROXIMATELY 334,776 SQUARE FEET ON A 14.8 ACRE SITE

LOCATED WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND SOUTH OF
ARROW ROUTE AT 12459 ARROW ROUTE; APN 0229-131-24.

A. Recitals .

1. The applicant, Newcastle Partners filed Design Review DRC2022-00101, Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00203, and Master Plan DRC2024-00036 applications as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject entitlements request is referred to as "the application."

2. On the 10th day of September 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date recommending the City Council approval the project as proposed.

3. On the 15th day of October 2025, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date.

4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

B. Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:

1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.

2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced meeting on October 15, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application is the redevelopment of a 14.8-acre site for the development of an approximate 334,776 square feet, consisting of 322,776 square feet of warehouse floor area and 12,000 square feet of office area (6,000 square feet on the ground floor and 6,000 square feet of mezzanine space) and associated improvements; and b. The project site is generally located south of Arrow Route and west of Etiwanda Avenue at 12459 Arrow Route. The project site is generally rectangular and is currently developed with two nonoperative buildings previously used as a steel wire manufacturing facility; and
ATTACHMENT 6

Page 138 ends

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX
DRC2022-00101, DRC2025-00203, DRC2024-00036 – Newcastle Arrow October 15, 2025

Page 2 ends

c. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows:

3. The City Council hereby approves Design Review DRC2022-00101 as a part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section

17.20.040 in support of the recommendation:
a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation is Industrial Employment District (IE), which promotes for industrial activities of all types and promotes the reinvestment and reuse of industrial lands into more clean and sustainable industrial uses and operations. The project applicant is proposing to redevelop the site with a new industrial warehouse building meeting current building and clean energy standards; and
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is within the Industrial Employment zone which permits the development of industrial warehouse developments; and
c. The proposed project, together with the Master Plan application, is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions and development standards of the Development Code. The project complies with the requirements of the Development Code except for the roadway standards and parking and average landscaping depth standards as described in the staff report; and
d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

4. The City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit DRC2025-00203 as part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.20.060 in support of the recommendation:
a. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation is Industrial Employment District (IE), which promotes for industrial activities of all types and promotes the reinvestment and reuse of industrial lands into more clean and sustainable industrial uses and operations. The project applicant is proposing to redevelop the site with a new industrial warehouse building; and b. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the site is located. The project site is within the Industrial Employment zone which permits the development of industrial warehouse developments; and
Land Use General Plan Zoning
Site Industrial
Warehouse Industrial Employment District Industrial Employment (IE) North Industrial
Warehouse Industrial Employment District Industrial Employment (IE) South Industrial Industrial Employment District Industrial Employment (IE) West Industrial Neo-Industrial Employment
District
Neo-Industrial (NI)
East Industrial Industrial Employment District Industrial Employment (IE)

Page 139 ends

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX
DRC2022-00101, DRC2025-00203, DRC2024-00036 – Newcastle Arrow October 15, 2025

Page 3 ends

c. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being proposed including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints that would make conduct of the use undesirable. The project site is well suited for the proposed new 334,776 square foot warehouse building meeting current building and clean energy standards and is bordered by sites similarly zoned for industrial development; and
d. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and service facilities. The project site is bound by existing industrial developments to the north and east, and industrially zoned property to the south and west. The proposed use complies with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the size and design of proposed project would be compatible with the existing and future uses in the vicinity; and e. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be injurious to or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
f. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on the city services, including police, fire, streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service due to the use. The area is already adequately served by existing fire stations, and no new or altered facilities would be needed to serve the allowed land uses with the area. As presented, Project-related impacts to Public Services including fire, police, schools, libraries, and parks, would be less than significant with conformance to GPU policies. Furthermore, the proposed project would pay all applicable development fees associated with fire protection services and would comply with all regulations governing fire prevention and safety, such as those established in the California Building Code, California Fire Code, California Health and Safety Code, and California Occupational Safety and Health Regulation, thus reducing demand for RCFPD services. Therefore, Project impacts related to public services are less than significant; and g. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEAQ). It was determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was the appropriate environmental document to evaluate the project and any potential impacts. The project EIR identified potentially significant impacts associated with air quality; archaeological, historical, and tribal cultural resources; energy; greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; hazards and hazardous materials; and transportation. However, the Draft EIR concluded that all potentially significant impacts identified for the proposed project would be mitigated to less than significant levels with the incorporation of mitigation measures, and none of the impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

5. The City Council hereby approves Master Plan DRC2024-00036 as part of the application and makes the following findings pursuant to the Development Code Section

17.22.020 in support of the recommendation:

Page 140 ends

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX
DRC2022-00101, DRC2025-00203, DRC2024-00036 – Newcastle Arrow October 15, 2025

Page 4 ends

a. The proposed master plan is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. The project furthers the vision of the General Plan and the Industrial Employment land use designation which promotes for industrial activities of all types and promotes the reinvestment and reuse of industrial lands into more clean and sustainable industrial uses and operations. The proposed industrial warehouse land use will complement and be compatible with the surrounding area’s character comprising of industrial uses. Project development would also help implement several goals and policies of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, including the infill development of an underutilized property through flexible design requirements (LC-1.9), ensure compatibility of new development with adjacent context (LC-1.11), and maintain a fiscally sound city with a diverse and sustainable tax base (LC-3.6); and
b. The proposed master plan meets the applicable requirements set forth in this title. Development Code Section 17.22,020 provides the Master Plan as a tool for establishing site specific development standards for projects of exception design that cannot be built under an existing zone due to constraints of existing development standards relative to site constraints or the location of a subject parcel or parcels within the city. The applicant is proposing to deviate from roadway standards for an industrial collector designated right-of-way and reductions in parking and average landscaping setback standards.

6. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with approval of the application:

a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No.2023110039), has been prepared for this project. The EIR was circulated for public and agency comment and proper notification was provided in accordance with CEQA and CEQA Guidelines; with the public comment period commencing May 23, 2025, through July 8, 2025, after which the City prepared a Final EIR (FEIR); and b. The Final EIR has been completed, and has analyzed the environmental impacts of the construction and operation of the Proposed Project; and c. The Final EIR contains the information required by CEQA Guidelines § 15132, including, without limitation, the Draft EIR and all revisions and additions thereto, comments on the Draft EIR received from various agencies, organizations, companies, individuals or other interested parties, and the City’s responses to the comments received on the Draft EIR, and findings as required by CEQA statute; and d. The EIR concludes that upon implementation of the project and all recommended mitigation measures, impacts associated with the project would remain less than significant. No significant and unavoidable impact was identified; thus, it is determined that no Statement of Overriding Consideration is required to be adopted.

7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 above, this City Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

8. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025.

Page 141 ends

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX
DRC2022-00101, DRC2025-00203, DRC2024-00036 – Newcastle Arrow October 15, 2025

Page 5 ends

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:

L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:

Kim Sevy, City Clerk
I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 15th day of October 2025, by the following vote-to-wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBER:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBER:

Page 142 ends

Conditions of Approval
Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2022-00101 DRC2024-00036, DRC2025-00203
Project Name: Newcastle (EDR) - Arrow/Tree Island
Location: 12459 ARROW RTE - 022913124-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Master Plan ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
The subject Design Review DRC 2022-00101, Conditional Use Permit DRC 2025-00203, and Master Plan DRC 2024-00036 applications authorize the development of an approximately 334,776 square foot industrial warehouse building in the Industrial Employment (IE) zone at 12459 Arrow Route; APN 0229-131-24.

1. The project shall comply with all regulations and requirements of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2023110039) including all applicable Mitigation Measures at the appropriate timing as noted in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). In addition, the project shall comply with all Conditions of Approval. The Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures shall be printed on the grading and building construction plans.

2. A Tree Removal Permit shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits.3.

Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity.

4. www.CityofRC.us
Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 143 ends

Project #: DRC2022-00101 DRC2024-00036, DRC2025-00203
Project Name: Newcastle (EDR) - Arrow/Tree Island
Location: 12459 ARROW RTE - 022913124-0000
Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Master Plan ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials , officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees” ), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature ), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures ) (collectively “Actions” ), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City ), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions , related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit , action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve , which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.

5. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet (s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction /grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.

6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Determination & Environmental Impact Report fee in the amount of $3,889.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing.

7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.

8. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 144 ends

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code .

Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction ), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in -lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D.

If the project developer chooses to pay the in -lieu fee, the in -lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance.

If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124.

If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council.

No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi -phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department.

9. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors.

10. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and /or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and /or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans.

11. For multi -family residential and non -residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right -of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.

12. www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 145 ends

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist 's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods.

13. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services.

14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right -of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.

15. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger.

16. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls.17.

The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department.

18. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species.

19. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building.

20. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department.

21. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82.

22. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet.23.

All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop).

24. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way.

25. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards.

26. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 146 ends

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings /units/buildings with open spaces /plazas/ recreational uses.

27. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs.

28. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and /or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.

29. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards.

30. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.

31. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations , and Master Plan.

32. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and /or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services /Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building.

33. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior of any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls.

34. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single -family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.

35. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner , homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits.

36. www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 147 ends

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits .

Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties.

37. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy.

38. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.

39. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.

40. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits.

41. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map

42. Trash receptacle (s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits.

43. Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to Grading Plan Approval, the project applicant shall submit a driveway exhibit demonstrating that all proposed driveways meet the City 's Driveway Policy on driveway spacing. The exhibit shall include all existing driveways adjacent to the project site as well as any known proposed driveways adjacent to the project site.

1. Prior to Building Permit, the project applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval a revised traffic signal timing sheet for the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Arrow Route prepared and signed by a licensed engineer. Approval of timing sheet revision is required prior to Engineering sign-off for Certificate of Occupancy.

2. www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 148 ends

Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
Prior to Building Permit, the project applicant shall pay a fair share contribution per the approved study for the design and construction, for improvements to the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The scope of improvements includes: restripe the existing roadway to add a second southbound left turn lane; add a second eastbound receiving lane which widens Arrow Route from Etiwanda to the easterly City Limits, and related infrastructure improvements. The fair share amount shall be determined based upon an engineer’s estimate of the listed improvements to be reviewed and approved by the City.

3. Prior to grading permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval a project specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) per the Technical Guidance Document for San Bernardino County for Stormwater Quality Management found at http ://www.sbcounty.gov/dpw/land/npdes.asp and the City of Rancho Cucamonga guidelines and policies found at the City's website https://www.cityofrc.us/community-development/engineering . The final WQMP shall conform to the approved plans under the DRC application and be updated to reflect the drainage management areas and boundaries shown on the preliminary grading plans.

4. Applicant shall pay all applicable Development Impact Fees prior to the issuance of the Building Permit.5.

Landscape District (LMD 3b): A signed consent and waiver form to join the appropriate Landscape Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of Building Permits .

Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.

6. CFD District: CFD2022-01 and CFD 2022-02: The developer shall enter into an Annexation Proceeding and sign a Consent and Waiver to join Community Facilities District CFD 2022-01 (Street Lighting Services) and CFD 2022-02 shall be filed by Special Districts prior to issuance of Building Permits. Any annexation cost shall be borne by the developer. For any questions and /or processing coordination of the CFD please contact Kelly Guerra at (909) 774-2582 or by email at [email protected].

7. The Applicant shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City, in the event that the properties located to the west and south of the Project Site identified as APN No(s). 0229-13-119 (same APN no . for both sites) are entitled and developed for future use within ten (10) years following approval of the Applicant’s project, the City shall condition its approval of said project to reimburse Applicant for the costs of constructing the additional half -width improvements to Yellowwood Place and A Street along the Applicant’s project frontage, as set forth in this Engineering Services Department Condition of Approval No. 10.

8. Standard Conditions of Approval
Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. Line of sight triangles shall be shown on precise grading plans at all project driveways and access points.

9. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all public streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the public streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.

10. www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 149 ends

Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
All public improvements on Yellowwood Place, "A" Street and "B" Street (interior streets, drainage facilities, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, access ramps and ADA compliant paths, street lights, storm drain and street trees. Prior to Building permit, construction plans for the following improvements shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Engineer:
a. Yellowwood Place: Applicant is responsible for the construction of Yellowwood Place along the property frontage to 44-foot curb to curb width and as approved by the City Engineer. Applicant shall not construct the sidewalk and landscape on the west side of Yellowwood Place. Those improvements shall be constructed by future developer.
b. " A" Street: Applicant is responsible for the construction of "A" Street along the project frontage to 44-foot curb to curb width and as approved by the City Engineer. Applicant shall not construct the sidewalk and landscape on the south side of "A" Street. Those improvements shall be constructed by future developer.
c. " B" Street: Applicant is responsible for the construction of "B" Street along the project frontage to 40-foot curb to curb width and as approved by the City Engineer. Truck turning analysis shall be submitted during plan check to make sure the 40-foot road width will be adequate. If the 40-foot road width is not adequate the applicant shall re -design to accommodate the required trucks. "No parking " signs shall be installed on both sides of the street along "B" Street. " Crown" of the street shall be on the centerline of "B" Street.
d. Applicant shall install adequate "dead-end" signs and barricades per City Standard and as approved by the City Engineer on "B" Street.

11. Existing Yellowwood Place south of Arrow Route is a privately owned and maintained road. A public easement for street right of way purposes shall be obtained from the private owners to provide a public street dedication and adequate corner cutbacks in compliance with the approved Yellowwood Place section. Easement right of way shall be recorded prior to issuance of Building permit. Applicant shall verify existing road is currently constructed to public standards. The City is aware that the road, curb & gutter, sidewalk, etc. are currently private and may include unique existing improvements. If certain circumstances prevent the street from fully meeting current public street standards, the applicant shall work with the City to modify or upgrade the street to the extent feasible, in accordance with City Standards and subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. The City will collaborate with the applicant to explore alternatives that address both City requirements and the specific needs and constraints.

Yellowwood Place along the project frontage is a proposed public road. A public easement for street right of way purposes shall be made to provide for a corresponding half -width public street dedication (33') in compliance with the approved Yellowwood street section. Easement right of way shall be recorded prior to issuance of Building permit.

12. www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 150 ends

Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
Proposed "A" Street is a proposed public road. A public easement for street right of way purposes shall be made along the parcel southerly property line to provide for a corresponding half -width public street dedication (33') in compliance with the approved "A" Street section. Easement right of way shall be recorded prior to issuance of Building permit.

13. Proposed "B" Street is a proposed public street planned for future connection north and south to the City's main circulatory roadway system. A public easement for street right of way purposes shall be made along the parcel easterly property line to provide for the full -width street dedication in compliance with the approved "B" Street section (50' right of way). Easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of Building permit.

14. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off -site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to:
a. Yellowwood Place public right -of-way dedication (33') to provide public roadway connection from the site to Arrow Route.
b. " A" Street public right -of-way dedication (33') to provide public roadway connection to the proposed site.

If the applicant is unable to obtain the necessary right -of-way, the project may require a site redesign , which shall be subject to review and approval by the appropriate approval authority. The City will work collaboratively with the applicant to explore alternatives and try to minimize potential impacts to the site.

15. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project.

Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information.

Instructions and forms are available at the City 's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program.

16. A non -refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved.

17. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 151 ends

Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Locking and latching hardware for access doors is required to be operable from the exterior of the building and is required to be single action latch/lock release on the interior of the building.

1. Access doors are required to be identified in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

2. Access doors are required to be distributed along the exterior of the building such that the lineal distance between adjacent access doors does not exceed 125 feet measured center to center.

3. Required alarm systems and supervision systems are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

4. The parcel is required to be annexed into Community Facilities District 85-1 (CFD 85-1) if it has not yet been annexed into the CFD. Please contact Kelly Guerra with the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s Special Districts Division at (909) 774-2582 or Kelly [email protected] to inquire about the annexation status and complete the annexation if needed. The annexation requirement will not be considered complete until the applicant provides proof of annexation or begins the annexation process and Special Districts notifies the Fire Marshal that the process has been started.

5. Plans for the alarm and /or supervision (monitoring) system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building Department for routing to the Fire District.

6. When radio signal strength testing determines that emergency responder communication coverage will require an in -building system to meet the requirements of the Fire Code, plans for the system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building Department for routing to the Fire District.

7. Plans for high piled combustible storage are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building Department for routing to the Fire District.

8. Plans for the private, onsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building Department for routing to the Fire District.

9. Plans for the public, offsite fire underground water infrastructure are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Plans are required to be submitted prior to or concurrently with the plans submitted to the Water District. Submit all plans to the Building Department for routing to the Fire District.

10. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building Department for routing to the Fire District.

11. Exterior doors and doors providing access to fire protection and life safety systems and equipment are required to have identification signage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-5. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

12. www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 152 ends

Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Emergency responder communication coverage in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-12 is required for the building (s) included in this project. A radio signal strength test of the public safety radio communication system conducted in accordance with the requirements of the 2022 California Fire Code is required to be submitted. Where existing radio signal strength does not meet the requirements of the Fire Code, a separate submittal for an emergency responder communication coverage system is required.

13. Designated and conforming aerial apparatus access is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. Show aerial apparatus access on the fire access plan. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

14. Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

15. The warehouse portion of this building may be allowed to utilize forklift and powered industrial truck mounted fire extinguishers to meet the Fire Code requirement for fire extinguishers. Please consult with the fire code official.

16. Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations.

17. Fire sprinklers are required to be installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

18. Fire flow information for this project is obtained from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD).

CVWD can be reached at 909-944-6000 or [email protected].

19. Fire flow is required to be in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. The Fire District has adopted the appendix without local amendments except that the minimum fire flow for commercial buildings shall not be less than 1500 gpm. Proof of the availability of the required fire flow must be provided to the Fire District in the form of a letter or written report dated within the past 12 months.

20. Gates installed across a commercial /industrial emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required to be in accordance with Standard 5-4. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

21. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection.

22. A Knox key switch is required to be installed on motorized gates that are installed across or provide access to a fire access road (fire Lane). See Fire District Standard 5-3 for Residential Gates and Fire District Standard 5-4 for Commercial and Industrial Gates.

23. Coordinate landscaping with the roof access ladder points and address signage. Landscaping cannot obstruct roof access or clear visibility of address signage from time of installation to maturity of the shrubs and trees.

24. www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 153 ends

Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit
Standard Conditions of Approval
Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is recommended for this project. Fire District Standard 33-3 provides the elements of a Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan .

The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

25. Roof access is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-6. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

26. Street address and unit /suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

27. Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section.

28. Public and private fire service water mains, public and private hydrants, water control valves, fire sprinkler risers, fire department connections (FDCs), and other fire protection water related devices and equipment are required to be provided, designed, and installed in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

29. The most current versions of the Fire District's Standards can be found at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/86zjfacfxqh8oeo/AABYEQ81w5vL7WZ7e1zBiu25a?dl=0

30. Combustible construction materials, including combustible roofing materials, are prohibited from being onsite prior to a water supply system in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-10 being provided in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-1. Copies of the Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section of this project in the Online Permit Center.

31. Temporary fire apparatus access (fire lanes) and temporary fire hydrants, if needed, are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 33-2. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section.

32. Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and a soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal.

The proposed structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC, NFPA 13, and the Current RCFPD Ordinance.

Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of California and ADA regulations.

1. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 154 ends

Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan.

1. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report.

2. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review.

3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits.

4. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.

5. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way.

6. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan /Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit.

7. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code.

8. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible , and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings.

9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.

10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code.

11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official.

12. www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 17Printed: 9/4/2025

Page 155 ends

Rancho Cucamonga City CouncilOctober 15, 2025

Rancho Cucamonga City Council
October 15, 2025