~ CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
CITY COUNCIL,
LIBRARY AND OBSERVATORY BOARD.
HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD,
AND THE CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTING
THE REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
Meeting Location:
City of Rancho Mirage
City Hall -Council Chamber
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
CALL TO ORDER
a) Flag Salute
REGULAR MEETING
THURSDAY, APRIL 20, 2023
1 :00 P.M.i,ii
AGENDA
b) Roll Call: Mallotto, Marker, Weill, Downs, Kite.
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS -An opportunity for the public to speak on issues that are not on the agenda for a maximum of three minutes per speaker.
COUNCIL/BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS/REPORTS
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approve April 6, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes.
2. Approve Extension of Completion Date for Tract Map No. 35089 -Bellavia. 04/20/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Page 1 of 3 Click Here For Late Submissions or Additions
3. Approve Special Assistance Fund (SAF) Awards.
4. Approve Demands.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0018, Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0004, and Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 -Linea (Nine Single- Family Residences on the Southern Half of Tract No. 35089 Between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia in Section 30):
A. Consider Finding Preliminary Development Plan Case No . PDP22-0004 and Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 to be Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15061 (8)(3) and Determine that the Previously Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA070003 is Still Valid for the Proposed Project;
B. Consider Approving Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0004, Subject to the Conditions of Approval and Based on the Content and Findings in the Staff Report; and
C. Consider Approving Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 to Change "Bellavia Court South" to "Via Linea," Based on the Content and Findings in the Staff Report. ·
ACTION CALENDAR
6. Consider Approving Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Rent Levels for Age-Restricted Residential Complexes (Parkview Villas, San Jacinto Villas, Santa Rosa Villas, and Whispering Waters).
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1 ).
Case Name: Vacation Rental Owners and Neighbors of Rancho Mirage et al. v. City of Rancho Mirage et al.
Case No.: CVRl2100368
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1 ).
Case Name: Vacation Rental Owners and Neighbors of Rancho Mirage v. City of Rancho Mirage.
Case No.: CVPS2200167
04/20/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Page 2 of 3
3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1 ).
Case Name: Wendy Hope Heckman v. City of Rancho Mirage
Case No.: 5:22-cv-2031 (Central District of California)
4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1 ).
Case Name: Unspecified since disclosure would jeopardize pending settlement negotiations.
5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4). (1 Potential Case).
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
RECONVENE OPEN SESSION
CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
i People with disabilities are encouraged to attend. If you have special communication or access needs, please contact the City Clerk's office at (760) 324-4511 -in advance of the meeting. ii Staff reports for all agenda items considered in open session, and any writings or documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies following distribution of the agenda regarding any item on the agenda, will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, at the Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory , and on the City's website at www.RanchoMirageCa .gov .
Declaration of Posting:
I, KristieRarros , CityCek of the City of Rancho Mirage, do hereby declare that a copy of the foregoing Meeting Notice/Agenda was personally delivered to the legislative bodies, posted in the City Hall posting box, at the Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory, and on the City website at least 72 hours in advance of tl)e m~ng. ~ -·ow~ 63/\4.;-/;;;>0?'"3 Signature Date
04/20/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Page 3 of 3
1-1
~ CITY OF RANCHO , MIRAGE
CITY COUNCIL,
LIBRARY AND OBSERVATORY BOARD,
HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD,
AND THE CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTING
THE REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
Meeting Location:
City of Rancho Mirage
City Hall -Council Chamber
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 ·
CALL TO ORDER -1 :02 P.M
REGULAR MEETING
THURSDAY, APRIL 6, 2023
1 :00 P.M.
DRAFT MINUTES
a) Flag Salute -Led by Council Member Meg Marker.
b) Roll Call: Mallotto, Marker, Weill, Downs, Kite -All Present.
PRESENTATIONS
Introduction of New Ritz-Carlton Rancho Mirage General Manager.
Gabe Codding, Director of Marketing, introduced Tiffany Gorman, Director of Sales and Marketing at Ritz-Carlton Rancho Mirage.
Ms. Gorman thanked the Mayor, Council Members, and City staff for their support and introduced the newly appointed Ritz-Carlton General Manager, Shannon Gilbert.
Ms. Gilbert expressed she was honored to be back in the City of Rancho Mirage where she started her career at the Ritz-Carlton Rancho Mirage in 1993. She thanked the City Council for their partnership through the years.
DRAFT 04/06/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 7
1-2
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS
Wally Melendez, member of the public, commented on the design and pricing of certain electric vehicles. He spoke of the need to think of the environment and cleanliness of the air when it came to vehicles.
Brad Anderson, Rancho Mirage resident, spoke of his experience with the City's administrative citation process and related court process. He recommended patrons of the Children's Discovery Museum of the Desert research the museum board and donors. He mentioned he was glad the City had gone back to live meetings .
COUNCIL/BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS/REPORTS
Council Member Marker noted her attendance at the Galleri Classic golf tournament. She mentioned she attended the Wolfson Park dedication with her fellow Council Members, where former Mayor Townsend was recognized, and expressed thanks to everyone who made that event happen. Council Member Marker encouraged the community to enjoy the pet-friendly hiking path, noting we were fortunate to live in a climate where we can enjoy the outdoors.
Council Member Mallotto reported that she, along with Council Member Ted Weill and Cultural Commissioner Michael O'Keefe, recently provided the Del Webb Rancho Mirage community with an update on what's happening in the City. She also congratulated the City of Palm Springs on celebrating their 85th anniversary.
Council Member Weill reported his attendance at the Wolfson Park dedication and presented photos of the event. He noted the attendance of members of the Glassman family, who are related to the Wolfsons, and had been part of the City's history for many years. Council Member Weill commented that citizens had expressed appreciation for the City's efforts in keeping the tranquility of the park and privacy of the trail. He commended the Public Works Department on an excellent job restoring the facility. He noted the City met its sustainability objective by having electric vehicle charging stations on-site. He added thatWolfson Park was probably the second most popular dog walking area in the City and thanked everyone involved in the project.
Mayor Pro Tern Downs spoke of the recent Galleri Classic golf tournament held at Mission Hills, noting it was the 52 nd consecutive year of professional golf in the City of Rancho Mirage. He commented it was a great event and some of the greatest names participated. He noted the importance of the event for the City, as it highlighted the City of Rancho Mirage to the world as a tourist destination. He noted that tourism was the primary engine that drove the economy in the City. Mayor Pro Tern Downs presented a marketing video promoting the City that was played on the golf channel during the tournament. He reported that the City signed a long-term contract to be a sponsor of the golf tournament for the next four years.
Mayor Kite commented that the Galleri Classic was a great event and he looked forward to additional ones in the future.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS -None.
DRAFT 04/06/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 7
1-3
CONSENT CALENDAR
Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager, presented the below-listed Consent Calendar items:
1. Waive Full Reading of All Ordinances Introduced or Adopted Pursuant to this Agenda.
2. Adopt Ordinance No. 1204, 2 nd Reading, Amending Section 2.44.010 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code to Adjust the Monthly Compensation and Benefits for City Council Members and Mayor.
3. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-(Next-in-Order), Approving the Updated Calendar Year 2023 Salary Schedule to Comply with California Public Employee's Ret◄rement System (CalPERS) Statutory and Regulatory Requirements for Compensation Earnable and Publicly Available Pay Schedules.
4. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-(Next-in-Order), Authorizing the Execution of a Surety Bond to Meet the Financial Security Requirement for Rancho Mirage Energy Authority (RMEA) Community Choice Aggregation Program.
5. Adopt Resolution No. 2023 -(Next-in-Order), Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into the Settlement Agreements with Teva, Allergan, Walmart, Walgreens, and CVS, Agreeing to the Terms of the MOU Allocating Settlement Proceeds, and Authorize Entry into the MOU with the Attorney General.
6. Approve March 16, 2023 Regular Meeting Minutes.
7. Receive and File Annual Board/Commission Reports.
8. Approve Final Acceptance of Fire Station 50 Seismic and Building Improvements (CP 19 - 353)
9. Approve Final Parcel Map No. 38106 -Via Josefina.
10 . Approve Special Assistance Fund (SAF) Award.
11. Approve Contracts List.
12. Approve Demands.
13. Approve Extension of Completion Date for Tract Map No. 36809 (Del Webb Rancho Mirage).
Public Comments
Brad Anderson, Rancho Mirage resident, spoke regarding Item No. 2, commenting he was opposed to increasing wages of Council Members. Regarding Item No. 4, he spoke in opposition to any type offunding increase or bond.
Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager, reported that Council Member Mallotto would recuse herself from consideration of Item No.13, due to her primary residence being located at Del Webb Rancho Mirage.
DRAFT 04/06/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 7
1-4
Steve Quintanilla, City Attorney, noted that Council Member Mallotto was welcome to speak as a resident regarding item No.13.
Mayor Pro Tern Downs spoke regarding Item No. 7, thanking board and commission members who serve on the various commissions for donating their time to make the City a better place to live.
Mayor Pro Tern Downs spoke regarding Item No.12, specifically the $180,000 contract with Desert Publications for the creation of a 50 th anniversary commemorative book. He commented that he was not in favor of including advertisements in the publication and would like the Council to revisit the idea of including advertorials in the commemorative book at some point in the future.
Council Member Weill commented that an in-depth review of the publication layout would be conducted and the various options explored; everyone would have an opportunity to provide their opinion through that process.
MOVED/SECONDED BY WEILL/DOWNS TO APPROVE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NOS. 1 THROUGH 12 AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
MOVED/SECONDED BY WEILL/DOWNS TO APPROVE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.13 AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED 4/0 (MALLOTTO RECUSED).
PUBLIC HEARINGS
14. Consider Adopting Resolution No. 2023-(Next-in-Order), Calling an Election on Levying a Special Tax Within the Area Proposed to be Annexed to Community Facilities District No. 1 (Annexation No. 190), Declaring the Election Results, Approving the Annexation of the Territory and Directing the Recordation of the Amendment of the Notice of Special Tax Lien. (In Connection with Tentative Parcel Map No. 38315, Palomino Four, Located at the Northwest Corner of Cypress Lane and Palomino Lane) Kofi Antobam, Director of Administrative Services, presented the staff report.
Public Comments -None
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk, declared the election results as follows: the ballot for the 2 eligible · votes was received on March 29, 2023, and was in favor; therefore, votes cast in equal 100% of total votes cast.
MOVED/SECONDED BY WEILL/MARKER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2023-11,
CALLING AN ELECTION ON LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ANNEXATION NO. 190),
DECLARING RES UL TS OF THE ELECTION, APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF THE
TERRITORY AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF THE AMENDMENT OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
DRAFT 04/06/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 7
1-5
ACTION CALENDAR
15. Consider Awarding Contract for Citywide Crack Sealing (CP 23-381) to Onyx Paving Company, Inc., in the Amount of $113,890.
Ryan Stendell, Director of Public Works, presented the report.
Public Comments -None
Mayor Kite inquired as to the timing of the project.
Mr. Stendell explained that the contract was being awarded now; however, the work would not be conducted until the busy season was well passed.
MOVED/SECONDED BY DOWNS/WEILL TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR CITYWIDE CRACK SEALING (CP 23-381) TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE AND RESPONSIVE BIDDER, ONYX PAVING COMPANY, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $113,890. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
16. Consider Approving a Two-Year Partnership with Coachella Valley Symphony for Amphitheater Programming.
Gabe Codding, Director of Marketing, presented the report.
Public Comments -None
Council Member Weill mentioned he had attended all of the past symphony shows, which were wonderful. He commented he preferred the two-year contract include an option for the second year; the second year of the contract would automatically kick in unless canceled 90 days prior to the start of the second year. He explained he was all for providing assurance to vendors, but was more comfortable with long-term contracts including an option.
Mr. Codding responded that the City's multi-year contracts include a clause that the contract was tied to the City's annual budget approval.
Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager, clarified that the contract clause Mr. Codding mentioned was a general clause, not specifically a financial exit clause.
MOVED SECONDED BY MARKER/WEILL TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER
AND DIRECTOR OF MARKETING TO ENTER INTO A TWO-YEAR AGREEMENT
WITH THE COACHELLA VALLEY SYMPHONY FOR THREE FREE PERFORMANCES
AND ONE TICKETED EVENT FOR RESIDENTS AND GUESTS AT THE RANCHO MIRAGE AMPHITHEATER IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $50,000 PER YEAR. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
· 17. Consider Allocating Additional Funds to the Turf Rebate Program in Partnership with Coachella Valley Water District.
Jessica Pulliam, Senior Management Analyst, presented the report.
DRAFT 04/06/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 7
1-6
Public Comments
Brad Anderson, Rancho Mirage resident, spoke in opposition to approving additional funding for the program, adding people should pay for the process themselves.
Mayor Pro Tern Downs asked if the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) was still willing to cooperate with the City to match funding.
Ms. Pulliam replied that CVWD was willing to cooperate, but could not guarantee they would match dollar-per-dollar, as their board could opt to reduce their contribution amount.
Mayor Kite asked if staff believed this would be the last contribution to the program.
Ms. Pulliam replied that staff recommended this be the last funding allocation for the fiscal year.
Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager, reported that the CVWD Board approved one final budget allocation, and it was anticipated that their side of the program would then come to an end.
Council Member Weill noted that the City's program was in participation with CVWD; if CVWD · discontinued participation, the City's side of the program would end as well. He added that the City's $500,000 contribution was contingent upon CVWD's participation.
MOVED SECONDED BY WEILL/DOWNS TO APPROVE AN ADDITIONAL $500,000
BUDGET ALLOCATION TO THE TURF REBATE PROGRAM, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO TAKE ALL FURTHER ACTIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE
SAME, INCLUDING APPROVING AND EXECUTING ALL ASSOCIATED AGREEMENT(S), APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1 ).
Case Name: Vacation Rental Owners and Neighbors of Rancho Mirage et al. v. City of Rancho Mirage et al.
Case No.: CVRl2100368
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1 ).
Case Name: Vacation Rental Owners and Neighbors of Rancho Mirage v. City of Rancho Mirage.
Case No.: CVPS2200167
3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1 ).
Case Name: Wendy Hope Heckman v. City of Rancho Mirage
Case No.: 5:22-cv-2031 (Central District of California) DRAFT 04/06/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 7
1-7
4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).
Case Name: Unspecified since disclosure would jeopardize pending settlement negotiations.
5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -POTENTIAL INITIATION OF LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4). (1 Potential Case).
Steven Quintanilla, City Attorney, reported that the City Council would recess into closed session to confer with legal counsel regarding Vacation Rental Owners and Neighbors of Rancho Mirage et al. v. City of Rancho Mirage et al, Vacation Rental Owners and Neighbors of Rancho Mirage v . City of Rancho Mirage, .Wendy Hope Heckman v. City of Rancho Mirage, an unspecified existing litigation item, and one potential initiation of litigation item.
Public Comments
Brad Anderson, Rancho Mirage resident, expressed concerns regarding the City's legal counsel and questioned if closed session logs were kept. He commented that the Heckman case was an overreach by the City . He also commented that the case name for Item No. 4 was included on a previous agenda .
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
The City Council, Library and Observatory Board, Housing Authority Board, and the City Council representing the Redevelopment Successor Agency recessed into Closed Session at 2:05 P.M.
RECONVENE OPEN SESSION
Mayor Kite reconvened the meeting at 2:24 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
Steve Quintanilla, City Attorney, reported there was no reportable action taken during closed session.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to consider, the meeting of the City Council, Library and Observatory Board, Housing Authority Board, and the City Council representing the Redevelopment Successor Agency was adjourned at 2:25 P .M.
Date Approved by City Council:
Kristie Ramos , City Clerk
DRAFT 04/06/2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 7
CITY m �· 0 MIRAG�
� 21
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
Leland Cole, City Engineer
DATE: April 20. 2023
FROM:
SUBJECT: Extension of Completion Date for Tract Map 35089 (Bellavia)
SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council enter into the attached First Amendment of· Subdivision Improvement Agreement, which provides for the extension of the completion date for Tract Map No. 35089 (Bellavia) until May 1, 2024.
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION
BACKGROUND:
Tract Map 35089 has two 5.04 acre parcels consisting of 18 residential lots, two private streets, and several landscaped parkway areas. The subdivision is located in Section 30, approximately 1,320 feet east of the intersection of Bob Hope Drive and Ginger Rogers Road, and the parcels are located on the north and south sides of Ginger Rogers Road. The property is bordered by TM 34227 (Estilo) on the north and TM 35619 (Echo RM) on the west. The rest of the surrounding area is largely vacant, except for a single-family residence on the east side of the tract's northern portion. Tract Map No. 35089 shows 18 residential lots ranging from .37 acres to .48 acres, with each of the lots fronting onto two private cul-de-sacs that are accessible from Ginger Rogers Road. (See the attached Vicinity Map and Tract Map excerpt in Attachment 1).
The Final Tract Map for the project was approved by the City Council on September 20, 2018. The agreement that the developer entered into with the City required that all improvements be completed no later than two years from approval date, which was September 20, 2020. As a result of market conditions, the development stalled, and the Developer requested an extension of time, which was approved by the City Council on August 20, 2020, and the new completion date was September 20, 2021.
In April of 2021, the property was sold, and the new Developer requested that the City extend the contract term to complete the improvements. The City Council approved an extension of contract term and the City entered into a new Agreement with the new Developer, which expires May 1, 2023 (See Attachment 2).
The Developer is in the final stages of project completion; however, there is still offsite and onsite work to be completed and the Developer has requested an extension of the required completion date until May 1, 2024 (See Attachment 3).
AGENDA ITEM#
2-1
2-2
DATE: April 20, 2023 Page 2 of 2
Extension of Completion Date for Tract Map 35089 (Bellavia) JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
DISCUSSION:
Section 16.20.11 OB of the City's Municipal Code permits extension of the completion date by the City Council if a timely request is made and adequate evidence is provided to justify the extension.
If the extension is approved, the Code states that the sub divider shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement extension with the City. In consideration of a subdivision improvement agreement extension, the following adjustments may bff required:
a. Revision of improvement plans to provide for current design and construction standards. b. Revised improvement construction estimates to reflect current improvement costs. c. Increase of improvement securities in compliance with revised estimates. d. Additional inspection fees.
e. Any fees then in effect.
The Council may impose additional requirements as recommended by the engineer or as it may deem necessary as a condition to approving any time extension for the completion of subdivision improvements.
The developer has requested the extension so that he can complete the improvements per the attached construction schedule. The offsite and onsite improvements for the Tract Map are to be completed by May 1, 2024.
Staff supports the requested extension. Staff received and approved the required revision to the improvement plans, as well as the additional fees, securities, and inspection fees for this second phase of the development. Upon completion of the improvements, the · project will be final inspected by the City and a punch list of necessary corrections will be generated. Upon completion of the punch list and acceptance of improvements by the City Council, the project will be complete, and securities released.
Staff recommends that Council approve the attached First Amendment of Subdivision Improvement Agreement which provides for the extension of the completion date to May 1, 2024 (See Attachment 4).
ATTACHMENT(S):
1. Vicinity Map
2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement
3. Extension Form and Supporting Documentation
4. First Amendment of Subdivision Improvement Agreement AGENDA ITEM#
2-3
ATTACHMENT 1
VICINITY MAP
2-4
•I '/ • I),•\ I
z
0 >-~
_j w ~ > a:: E:l C
~ ~
() -• z
IJJ ·~
FR ANK SINA rRA DRIV E _ ~ ____ ·-·· __ _ _
co
0 a)
COUNTRY CLUB DRIV E
2-
5 IN THE: CITY OF RANCHO /.I/RAG£, COUNTY OF RIV[RS/0£, STAT£ OF CAUFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 35089 t O!A!. c;,tOSS A.fl:£). • lG.06': J,l;R£S ~UMBERED LOTS -18 LOTS
LETTERED PUBLIC STREET LOTS -
2 LOTS
LETTERED PR!VATE S7REET LOTS -2 L01S
OPEN S?ACE \.DJS ci 6 LOlS
B£/NG A SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 18 OF TH£ NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION TOGETHER WITH GOY£RNM£NT LOT 19 OF THE: SOUTHWEST QUART£R OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE: 5 £AST S.B.M
--:, I ;
..J I~--
1 M;: 44 2 /70-7 3 .. =7 I.. • ~,;--s,
--°lr-'" ,:,;;,-~ i;,: .. --
~ -~:.~~ .... -.
"' h""• '; ~• ( .i.•
" I
~r .it
a: ' -a l W '"" , --~ z ; •. -,'b ........ , ~ ~t c..,_ - UJ
"' I (/) LOT·!(• lO~..._., w ,.,, -_,,..;LOT ~.r / I~,.
Ct:: ~ r,;;i,_:.:__ / '\ ,-1,J_:,,
@h.l_ ,,___ . ..,_ _, -<>~}'•,J:~,; _?-):.::-':-//"{I;i VIA FLOR:NClA ,3":>·•,;'. \ ____ __y c;-:.::. t g_: tI:~ ~L"7~7£ ( :.:•t,-r-\ gt-g.~~~d / I • •
-~ »:-:--r---:1•-,:· -.-;-5c: i.~·• "?u.___-;; ;A;;--_.;----"5:·t"\.~-~-~ci.:u _/. / \, \l :-
~I I ' ~'-·~
~··
..... •02z ) --~ ~ -~ .. -, .... s " •.. ~ \ •. J 7\. ,c :'-. IS.. ~ , :;;·., _ -_.,..J1.:1, _
.__,,o c.~~-'l~ ...,c .._,o" L iS 3r~ ,__:.:~•:* ~-;~
-~.,_I -. !7!7 :d'( ::: i.Z ,...,-.;;T~"!.. ~"'.:y-.)-~•t "'~ =~):-~ uo ,, -~r ~ I ~~ "" ,, ~!:-&-;/ ~!~ .. .:,~i Ctj ~ t;;ii.-J"7 f,
DETAIL •A.·
:-.or;osc.,,,i_;;
=· ~
DETAL -s•
•.::-:-·est-='.
DETAJ.. •c•
r;cr re sc.-.i.!:
' ---·-/
------------~ PM 2 "6/10-11~
\/IA MARTA D,
1--
.. 1 SO.LE 1".i::::200 ·
"SJA., w•
SEE SHEET 2 FOR EASEMENT NOTES
SEE SHEETS 4 ANO 5 FOR DETAU.ED LOT
------, [fr,-~
@-, -i
DIMENSIONS .
(j) INOICA TES SHEET NIJM!lER
GERAI..£ FORD ER~\3D __ c-ts,
JO,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
n-,~ 8ASCS or ~ ~R rt--,-s p,,/,(' :s 7-1,: CE~Ttr: SEC7C" ur-t: ~- .Si:C-!v•~ Y) tl)"flr~P .:. ~>C:.llt Ull ~ ,"lOT!::l
1•«,c,,:-a.sc 1·,.= ,NJ;h ~-r,;.,:; ;T,>,iA:)£0 -?'LS 4,)$;l" .. -?..-J>I"!. ..:,-;_;.-s r..orr..::i or.-1~£
~1,.c.-rrs sr= 1-v "· cc?P:S=thEI.C s.-1.1a;,:.~ "?..i ,s~s·. f'..l..r.sl'I N .i.e. "l'Ol'T (~0(:'10 l,i;?.M:,[ ST::: ~'{y( ·c · 1a0t-.;.
U"-1..£.S tJCTO orw;:1 ,':;."$. l:"-U7...S HOT!O o-;HC.,.. ....... ·~£ -.:x:.,.ru,lt{c~::,.!~
1>1c1c, . .-,.:s ~,c:i;w D11.r.:. P-.:.'8 ri:.:;.cr w-.~ -io ~~:u, ~fl ~u,e-.. ~ R2 •~Ot~n:::; kECCP.i, 0,.!.1, ?C.i't. ~ , i VS:
llol:C.:.Tr.!:> "'t. l.:. ..-tH r'~L w.Sl 1'0 )S1,;.;.. ;:..-3 2:tt,fSi,-'>,:l ;°;:4 :.'f0!C4rts ~RC J, {" ";. r'i..9. ~ 1~/J;.
,o m:e,,.1£-s .tfto;lC ~r,. ?L-' > ,~.r•C:
~c 11 .."-Ct1" =RO;,o;;';"\O',,.
sr:-l,A:l J...'\Q f>G t, c::P.a ~N lr m -P-..5 •~-SC 'I.A.-.:.,.J -;,..; !M co.i-:: rcc.·nt-:;: S".,o.s.:FOi .PLS ,~-OR "''-IL M-0 1,:,,:, I:' " • .:.S ~i-"ROFi,:1,;Tt. Al ;.:~=:
LOT co~!:P.'i. ~c·s. ::c·-s ..,....,p "'',{"-lf P(.r.-.rs .:"11.I':i.'.: or ... ::;.1t1~ /.IQ'"'.f.t.:
MONUMENT NOTES.
II ~~~::~~ .. ~1~~ );J.J'/~--f\.l.f.il: Prli ,115 ,..:~/;;a-,:.. [[ ~ ~~~ ~:1~~~~-~)#"i~ w;~ ~i,;1::h1.~~&l.
~._,i.,:::-~"""I• :· .,:,, ?.--'Ii: ">.!: ~~·. !">..i...:.,,. ,.; :.~.u.."t:-:v.:s~~ [: rl) r,..,,,t,. A-'.0 -,:; ::"~;J; "IS tS-00", (}',I. 1.a· IN ~~ FCOT"ltlv. ;> !", fl..lJ:Sr-•• I'~ '°'f:! H':/70-7! -.:.CC:7:D ,.S C/L ::lf i..;..-.:;r :.,A.-.E.
11_ ~-i,_c~1c::~::•1 s-;:.,.."'Eu "'..S HY!-", ;.:'.R RS 14.)0; --'i:£~.:, ,>$ •~ :;;,. 2J ~:►~~~.:..~, ~1-i~~;j[-iJ;,:.~~;~l,::...2tt;~~? A,'i':i ;;,. 200:>-eel !]j .. I;., t//TK". 'l~ .11r.r, ;~US:/"\ P{j;!: r:i l!./!7 ..... .:EPIC) AS /\f. c.~ ~-2, ~ ·) . .;oNt;. "'-"l;.. NC '0. F1.Vii-'. ~'O ~--,tCc.::?rt"~ .-\S C/;. ~t,'Gt?. ?.7~ ;.f $l'r ~ :;e-,,-.trT ;a. ?:)>~ '1,.f,-COr?;JM:::..r.. ST .. ,1,1;:>u) ·;,~,; •~!19". ;. • .,;:;,-_ m ~ iji~\:t:~¥;{~~{~=t~~f ::1{1~~ C: r[
GJ M;,.f.;;~ ~~ -~N",!;'f. ;t ;5,;;7 s1~ ?t,1:3 ::a;~-7~ ,>,CC~t:O (5 :J!;_~o-~:E~~~-¥1 ~f~;f 2'€f,~•o· ;i..LJ'".,;,. :;._~ Plolll ::ie;,0-~1 --CCO>i'CC ,>S Cl~ @J tl,-.J; :f~_"ftf. ·ro~ ;?!~tf~~t~,.~ ;tr~~t~~~_sm .. ~,,- ® . ~2 g.s,ifi/'C~~ ~. 1g:,·. ~ !:) :>' ~..J> WO 4;~;1/~-'-!:
J.N. 101,9
2-6
ATTACHMENT 2
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
2-7
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
(Tract 35089)
This agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of April 19, 2021, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, a municipal corporation ("CITY") and DESERT ESTAlEBUILDERS, Ll..C ("DEVELOPER"), with respect to the following:
A. CITY Approved Final Tract Map 35089, subject to the applicant developer entering into a subdivision improvement agreement whereby such developer agreed to complete public improvements within a given time. The project has changed hands, and the current subdivision improvement agreement is currently set to expire September 20, 2021, absent further action of CITY.
8. DEVELOPER is in escrow to purchase that certain 10.8 acre real property located in Section 30 approximately 1,320 feet east of the intersection of Bob Hope Drive and Ginger Rogers Road, on Assessor's Parcel Numbers [INSERT], in the City of Rancho Mirage, California. In accordance with Section 16.20.110 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, DEVELOPER has requested that CITY grant an extension of the completion date required of its predecessor in interest to May 1, 2023. This Agreement shall become effective upon DEVELOPER securing ownership in fee simple of said property, which is estimated to close [INSERT]. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66462(c) and City's Municipal Code Section 16.20.090, DEVELOPER has executed various security instruments in connection with the Agreement to ensure completion of construction of the improvements and to ensure payments to laborers and suppliers of materials. The parties hereto acknowledge CITY would not approve this Agreement without assurances that the security instruments are effective and will remain in effect until duly released. Among other obligations, concurrent with execution of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall duly execute and deliver to CITY an assignment and assumption agreement.
C . On April 1, 2021, City Council approved this Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
D . DEVELOPER shall construct the following public improvements ("work") for the above-referenced property: streets, curbs, gutters, storm drains, sewer, water, walls, landscaping and any improvements associated with this development. an as described on Schedule A hereto.
E. CITY-approved plans and specifications for the construction of the work, which are incorporated herein by reference and prepared by: MSA Consulting, are identified as:
Tract Map 35089 (Title as appears on plans).
F. The following are attached hereto and made a part hereof: Schedule A, Schedule B, Schedule C.
1. IMPROVEMENTS: For valuable consideration, DEVELOPER agrees to do, or cause to be done, at DEVELOPER'S expense and without any cost or liability to CITY, all of the work described herein by the date specified in Schedule A. DEVELOPER warrants that all of the materials supplied and work to be done will be of good quality and workmanship. Said work shall be in strict conformity with the plans and specification s of the work, the standard
2-8
specifications and drawings for public improvements adopted by CITY and this Agreement.
DEVELOPER shall furnish all transportation, equipment, labor, services, permits, utilities, and all other items necessary to complete the work. DEVELOPER shall pay all claims, demands and liability arising out of, or resulting from or in connection with, the performance of the work as provided for in this Agreement. DEVELOPER shall furnish accurate "as constructed" plans. In addition, DEVELOPER shall, within thirty (30) days of acceptance of the work, set all final monuments in place for acceptance. DEVELOPER'S obligations herein are not limited by any cost estimates nor will any estimate be a measure of damages.
CITY in its sole discretion and without liability to CITY, City Council members, CITY'S engineer, and their consultants, and each of their officials, directors, officers, employees and agents, may require changes, alterations, or additions to the plans and specifications which do not exceed ten percent ( 10%) of the original CITY-approved cost estimate of the work for the reasons set forth herein. Changes, alterations, or additions in addition to said ten percent (10%) limitation may be made if to correct errors or omissions in the approved plans and specification and for unforeseen conditions such as but not limited to rock excavation, unstable soil conditions or high water tables requiring dewatering.
2. INSURANCE: DEVELOPER shall not commence or continue to perform any work unless DEVELOPER has in full force and effect all insurance required hereunder with companies satisfactory to CITY. To be acceptable, insurers must be authorized to do business, and have an agent for service of process, in California, and have an "A" policyholders rating and a financial rating of at least Class V, in accordance with the current Best's Ratings. All insurance policies shall be maintained at DEVELOPER's expense until the work is accepted by CITY and provide for coverage of all causes of action or disputes arising out of acts in performance of the construction of the work herein, whether said causes or disputes are filed or brought to the attention of CITY before or after the termination of this contract.
Concurrent with execution of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall provide certificate(s) of insurance and endorsements, satisfactory to CITY, or otherwise provide proof of insurance as approved by the City Attorney, certifying that DEVELOPER has and will maintain for the Agreement period, full worker's compensation insurance coverage as required by State laws, for all persons who are or may be employed in carrying out the work. This provision shall not apply if DEVELOPER has no employees performing work under this Agreement. If DEVELOPER has no employees for the purposes of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall sign the Certificate of Exemption from Worker's Compensation Insurance, attached hereto as Schedule "C."
Concurrent with execution of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall provide to CITY certificate(s) of insurance and endorsements, satisfactory to CITY, or otherwise provide proof of insurance as approved by the City Attorney, certifying that DEVELOPER has general liability and commercial vehicle liability insurance coverage naming CITY, City Council members, CITY'S engineer, and their consultants, officials, directors, officers, agents and employees, as additional insureds for both bodily injury and property damage in a single limit of not less than that specified in Schedule A. DEVELOPER shall ensure that the most current certificates of insurance and endorsements shall be delivered to and maintained by the CITY at all times. The requirements set forth in this paragraph shall survive expiration or sooner termination of this Agreement.
General liability and commercial vehicle liability insurance coverage shall include each of the
2-9
following types of insurance as required by CITY to carry out this Agreement:
i.General Liability
1. Comprehensive Form
2. Premises-Operations
3. Explosion and Collapse Hazard
4. Underground Hazard
5. Products/Operations Competed
6. Contractual Insurance
7 . Broad Form Property Damage
Including Completed Operations
8. Independent Contractors
9. Personal Injury
B. Automobile Liability
1. Comprehensive Form, Including
Loading and Unloading
2. Owned
3. Hired
2-10
Concurrent with execution of any agreements between DEVELOPER and any subcontractors retained by DEVELOPER to perform any work required of DEVELOPER hereunder, and in any event prior to DEVELOPER authorizing any subcontractors to perform any such work or to even conduct any preliminary activities at the location of where the work i s t o b e c o m p I e t e d in preparation for or in anticipation of such work, DEVELOPER shall collect certificates of insurance and endorsements from all such subcontractors evidencing proof that all subcontractors have procured and will maintain all the insurance coverages required of DEVELOPER under this Agreement, and name as additional insureds the parties to this Agreement. DEVELOPER agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this Section.
In addition to naming the CITY, City Council members, CITY'S engineer, and their consultants, officials, directors, officers, agents and employees, as additional insureds, as set forth above, the certificates of insurance and endorsements, including those provided by any subcontractor, provided either on forms required by the CITY or as otherwise approved by the City Attorney, shall bear the following endorsements: (1) each policy required herein must be endorsed to provide that the policy shall not be cancelled or non-renewed by or reduced in coverage or limits (except by paid claims) unless the insurer has provided the CITY with thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation; (2) the carriers of all required insurance policies must waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY and its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors; and (3) except for worker's compensation insurance, if any, all insurance policies required to be provided by DEVELOPER must be endorsed to provide that the policies shall apply on a primary and noncontributing basis in relation to any insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, maintained or available to the CITY, and its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors.
DEVELOPER shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policies required hereunder and shall also be responsible for payment of any self-insured retentions. In the event DEVELOPER maintains insurance with broader coverage and/or limits of liability greater than those required herein, CITY requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits of liability maintained by DEVELOPER. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to CITY. The fact that insurance is obtained by DEVELOPER shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of DEVELOPER, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of · this Agreement. The duty to indemnify and hold the CITY harmless shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by DEVELOPER. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of DEVELOPER, its principals, officers, agents, employees, persons under the supervision of DEVELOPER, vendors, suppliers, invitees, sub-contractors, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.
Without limiting the generality of the forgoing, DEVELOPER agrees and acknowledges that if it fails to obtain all of the insurance required in this Agreement in accordance with the requirements herein, or to obtain and ensure that the coverage required herein is maintained by any subcontractors or others involved in any way with the Project, DEVELOPER shall be responsible for any losses, claims, suits, damages, defense obligations, or liability of any kind or nature attributable to the CITY or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors; and all performance under this Agreement shall be discontinued immediately until notice is received by CITY that the required insurance has been restored to
2-11
full force and effect and that the premiums therefor have been paid for a period satisfactory to CITY. Any failure to maintain the required insurance, including insurance required of any subcontractors or others involved in any way with the Project, shall be sufficient cause for CITY to terminate this Agreement. ·
All insurance certificates executed in connection with this Agreement, whether issued as DEVELOPER or any of DEVELOPER's subcontractors as the named insured, shall be signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all the information contained in the insurance certificates is true and correct, and such representation shall be made knowingly based on independent investigation and verification.
Nothing contained in these insurance requirements shall limit the liability of DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER'S sureties. Review and acceptance of insurance certificates shall not constitute any representation by CITY or its representatives that any required insurance has been issued.
3. DEVELOPER'S LIABILITY: DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER'S sole cost and expense, be solely and completely responsible for all matters affecting the design, prosecution, progress, and completion of the work (both on and off the job site).
DEVELOPER shall be responsible for observing all laws. DEVELOPER shall provide for public convenience and safety of workers, including DEVELOPER'S workers, if any, and those of DEVELOPER'S subcontractors, suppliers and others contributing to the work.
DEVELOPER shall protect CITY property · and property rights of others, including the location, maintenance, and replacement of utilities, whether shown on the plans or not.
DEVELOPER shall give prior notification to utility O\M1ers. DEVELOPER shall notify Underground Service Alert at 1-800-422-4133 at least 48 hours prior to start of construction.
DEVELOPER shall protect against and prevent drainage from storm runoff. DEVELOPER shall not interfere with easements, rights-of-way and encroachment permits. Nothing in this Agreement, the specifications, or other contract documents, or CITY'S approval of the plans and specifications or inspection of the work is intended to include CITY'S review, inspection, acknowledgment of or responsibility for any such · matters. CITY, City Council members, CITY'S engineer, and their consultants and each of their officials, directors, officers, employees, and agents shall have absolutely no responsibility or liability for the above.
4. DEVELOPER'S INDEMNIFICATION: DEVELOPER shall def'ero, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, City Council members, CITY'S engineer and their consultants and each of their officials, directors, officers, agents and employees from and against all liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses and other costs, including costs of defense and attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting from or in connection with the design or construction of the work, . both on and off the job site, and during and after completion, except for any such claim arising out of the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers. The indemnity provided above relates to liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses and other costs: (1) attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease or death, or to injury to or destruction of property (other than the work itself), including the loss of use resulting therefrom, and (2) caused in whole or, or subject to the remainder of this paragraph, in part by any act or omission of DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER'S engineer, any subcontractor, any supplier, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts or omissions any of them may be liable. If any liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses and other costs are caused in part by any act or omission (active, passive or comparative negligence included) of a party indemnified hereunder,
2-12
DEVELOPER's indemnification obligations hereunder shall only extend to the proportionate share of such liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses and other costs caused by any act or omission of DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER'S engineer, any subcontractor, any supplier, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts or omissions any of them may be liable. The indemnification and agreement to hold harmless provided for hereunder shall extend to damages to or taking of property resulting from the design or construction of said improvements or the diversion of waters or from the design or construction or maintenance of drainage systems, streets, and other improvements.
Acceptance of these improvements by CITY shall not constitute an assumption by CITY of any responsibility for such damage or taking.
As to any and all claims which fall within the indemnification provided for hereunder against the indemnified parties by any employee of DEVELOPER, any contractor, any subcontractor, any supplier, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, the indemnity obligations hereunder shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for the DEVELOPER, subcontractor, supplier or other person under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts or other employee acts.
DEVELOPER shall also defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, City Council members, CITY'S engineer, and their consultants, and each of their officials, directors, officers, employees and agents from and against all losses, expenses, damages (including damages to the work itself), attorneys' fees and ·other costs, including costs of defense, which any of them may incur both during and after completion with respect to any latent deficiency in the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, observation of or construction of the work referred to herein or any injury to a person or property, real or personal, as a result of any such latent defect or portions of the work which CITY reasonably suspects may also be defective by reason of such latent defects in the work performed by DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER'S subcontractors, or suppliers or designed by their representatives, except for any such claims arising out of the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers. Provisions of this paragraph shall remain in effect ten (10) years following acceptance of improvements by the CITY. Nothing contained herein shall limit CITY'S remedies pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, Section 337 .15.
The indemnity provisions contained in this Section shall survive expiration or sooner termination of this Agreement.
5. SECURITY: With the execution of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall furnish and deliver to CITY, at no expense to CITY, a payment security, and a performance security.
Each shall be in the amount of CITY-approved estimate specified in Schedule A. Bonds shall be furnished by surety companies satisfactory to CITY, on the forms provided by CITY. No . alterations or substitution of said forms shall be allowed except on approval of City Attorney. To be acceptable, surety companies must be authorized to do business in, and have an agent for, service of process in California, be on the accredited list of the United States Treasury Department, and/or have an "A" policyholder's rating and a financial rating of Class V, or better, in accordance with the current Best's Rating. The bonds shall be limited to amounts acceptable to the Treasury Department.
None of the following shall in any way affect the obligations of any surety. Each surety waives notice thereof: (a) any change, extension of time, alteration or additions to the terms of the Agreement, or the work to be performed, or the plans and specifications therefor; (b) any
2-13
matters unknown to surety which might affect surety's risk, exceptthat CITY shall advise surety upon request of the following: (1) any written claims it receives from unpaid subcontractors or suppliers, (2) any written orders received from other public authorities charging violations of laws, ordinances or regulations, and (3) failure of DEVELOPER to comply . with any written notice to correct defective work. The obligations of DEVELOPER shall not be limited by the amount of such bonds.
6. TYPES/AMOUNT OF SECURITY: If specified in Schedule A, in lieu of payment and performance bonds, DEVELOPER may furnish CITY either cash, a Letter of Credit, or an Agreement of Deposit or other security satisfactory to City Attorney as security for performance (see Schedule 8). Said security shall be in an amount not less than 100% of the cost estimate and, in addition, for payment of those furnishing materials, labor or equipment in an amount not less than 50% of the cost estimate. Said security agreements shall be on forms furnished by CITY. No alterations or substitution of said forms shall be allowed. The obligations of DEVELOPER shall not be limited by the amount of the security required. No interest shall be paid DEVELOPER on any cash deposit made pursuant to this paragraph.
7. COSTS AND DEPOSITS: DEVELOPER agrees to pay CITY, on demand, the full amount of all of CITY'S costs incurred before, within or after acceptance in connection with the work and this Agreement. These costs include but are not limited to plan checking, inspection, materials furnished, attorneys' fees incurred in connection with preparing and negotiating this Agreement, and all other expenses, including engineers' and attorneys' fees of CITY, directly attributable to the work and this Agreement. These costs shall include a reasonable amount for CITY'S overhead in connection therewith, plus any applicable fees of CITY. CITY'S costs shall include the cost of inspectin_g and restoring other portions of the work both during and after acceptance which CITY reasonably suspects may also be defective by reason of known defects in the work or other work performed by DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER'S contractors, subcontractors, or suppliers or designed by their representatives.
DEVELOPER shall deposit with the CITY, concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, such sums as the CITY established as deposits set forth in Schedule A.·Should the actual expenses be in excess of the deposit set forth in Schedule A, DEVELOPER shall pay the amount of such excess on demand. Should the actual expenses be less than the estimated deposit in Schedule A, CITY shall refund the difference, without interest, to DEVELOPER within ninety (90) days of acceptance of work. CITY may terminate its activity herein if DEVELOPER fails to make additional deposits on demand. Said deposit is not a trust fund and said deposit may be co-mingled with other similar deposits.
8. PARTIAL UTILIZATION: Until all work has been completed and accepted by CITY and all other public authorities having jurisdiction, DEVELOPER shall be responsible for the care and maintenance of, or any damage to, the work.
When the work or any portion of it is sufficiently complete to be utilized or placed into service, CITY shall have the right, upon written notification to DEVELOPER, to utilize oralbN1heutilization of such portions of the work and to place or cause the placement of the operable portions into service. With this notice and commencement of utilization or operation by CITY or any other third party, DEVELOPER shall be relieved of the duty of maintaining the portions so utilized or placed into operation. However, such use and operation shall not relieve DEVELOPER of the full responsibility for completing the work in its entirety, for making good any defective work or materials, for protecting the work from damage by DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER'S engineer, · any subcontractor, any supplier, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts or omissions any of them may be liable, and for being responsible
2-14
for damage to the work by DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER'S engineer, any subcontractor, any supplier, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts or omissions any of them may be liable. Nor shall such action by CITY be deemed completion and acceptance. Further, such action shall not relieve DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER'S sureties and insurers of the provisions hereof relating to indemnity and guarantees.
9. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: Acceptance of any p u b I i c i m p rove m e n ts co n st it u ti n g a n y of t h e w o r k shall be by action of the City Engineer. Neither the acceptance nor any prior inspections or failure to inspect shall constitute a waiver by CITY of any defects in the work. From and after acceptance, the public improvements co n s t i t u t i n g a n y o f t h e w o r k shall be owned, operated, and maintained by CITY. As a condition to acceptance, DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER'S contractor shall certify to CITY in writing that all of the public improvements constituting any of th e work have been performed in strict conformity with the Agreement and that all costs have been paid or supplied to CITY security, satisfactory to CITY, guaranteeing such .performance.
DEVELOPER shall be required to maintain the payment bond in its full amount for up to 6 months after CITY acceptance of the work. The payment bond shall secure payment to the contractor, sub-contractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials. Following the 6 month period, the payment bond may either be released or reduced to an amount no less than any claims on which an action has been filed and notice given to the CITY in writing.
In addition to DEVELOPER'S other obligations under the Agreement DEVELOPER warrants all work and materials to be good quality and fit for the purpose and intended use.
DEVELOPER shall also repair, replace, and restore any and aUsuch work which may prove defective in workmanship and/or materials without expense whatsoever to CITY; ordinary wear and tear and unusual abuse or neglect excepted. DEVELOPER shall also repair, replace, and restore any other work which is displaced in correcting defective work as well as other portions of the work which CITY by reason of such defects reasonably suspects may also be defective. DEVELOPER shall provide a bond or other security satisfactory to CITY for a period of one (1) year to secure a portion of the obligations in this Section 9. Said bond or other security shall be in an amount satisfactory to CITY but in no case less than 15% of cost of the onsite and offsite work referred to on Schedule A. Said bond or other security shall in no way limit the time within which CITY may bring action for breach of this warrant (CCP 337) or action for latent defects (CCP 337 .15) nor the amount of such claim or judgment.
In the event of a failure to commence with the compliance of above-mentioned conditions in this Section 9 within seven (7) calendar days after being notified in writing or failure to diligently pursue such compliance to completion, CITY is hereby authorized to proceed to have the defects repaired and made good at the expense of DEVELOPER, who hereby agrees to pay the cost and charges therefor immediately on demand.
If, in the opinion of CITY, nonconforming work creates a dangerous condition or requires immediate correction or repair to prevent further loss to CITY or to prevent interruption of operations, CITY shall attempt to give the DEVELOPER notice. If DEVELOPER cannot be contacted or does not comply with CITY'S request for correction within a reasonable time as determined by CITY, CITY may proceed to make such correction or provide such repair. The costs of such correction or repair shall be charged against DEVELOPER, who agrees to make payment for said costs upon demand.
2-15
Corrective action by CITY shall not relieve DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER'S sureties or insurers of the guarantees and indemnities of this Agreement.
This paragraph does not in any way limit CITY'S remedies pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, Section 337 and 337 .15, or the guarantee on any items for which a longer guarantee is expressly specified or on any items for which a manufacturer or supplier gives a longer guarantee period. DEVELOPER agrees to act as a co-guarantor with such manufacturer or supplier and shall furnish CITY all appropriate and av a i I ab I e guarantee or warranty certificates upon completion of the work. No manufacturer's guarantee period shall in any way limit the liability of DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER'S sureties and insurers · under the indemnity or insurance provisions of this Agreement.
10. .EASEMENTS AND FEE INTERESTS: DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER'S sole cost and expense, furnish CITY with appropriate easements and fee title as may be requested by CITY to required facilities sites for the entire work, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, restrictions, and covenants other than current real property taxes then a lien but not yet payable. At DEVELOPER'S cost and expense, DEVELOPER shall furnish CITY with an acceptable title insurance policy insuring CITY has title as above required with an endorsement insuring CITY against mechanics' lien claims arising out of the performance of the work. Easements shall be in standard form acceptable to CITY, shall be not less than the width CITY determines necessary to maintain the work, and shall be executed and delivered to CITY concurrent with execution of this Agreement. Easements shall be recorded prior to CITY accepting the work or furnishing services to any portions of the property under development (other than those as may be delivered under a temporary service agreement with DEVELOPER). ·
11. DEVELOPER AND AGENTS: DEVELOPER shall be as fully responsible to CITY for the acts and omissions i1respedofthev.ak of DEVELOPER'S subcontractors and of the persons directly or indirectly employed by DEVELOPER'S subcontractors as DEVELOPER is for the acts and omissions of persons directly or indirectly employed by DEVELOPER. To that end , DEVELOPER shall take such steps as are reasonably necessary to ensure that its subcontractors do not take any steps in relation to the work which would cause DEVELOPER to be in breach of this Agreement and to ensure that such subcontractors shall take such steps as are reasonably necessary to ensure that they do not take any steps in relation to the work which would cause DEVELOPER to be in breach of this Agreement. To that end, DEVELOPER shall bind every subcontractor to be bound by the terms of this Agreement, as applicable and appropriate. Nothing contained in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between any of DEVELOPER'S subcontractors and CITY.
Consent is hereby given DEVELOPER to have the work performed by the California licensed Class A Contractor(s) named in Schedule A. DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER'S contractor may satisfy the requirements of this section by having, in lieu of said Class A license, an a pp ro pr i ate a I te rna t e license as determined by CITY.
12. DEFAULT BY DEVELOPER: If DEVELOPER refuses or fails to prosecute the work or any separable part thereof with such diligence as will ensure its completion within the time specified herein, or any written extension thereof, or fails to complete such work within such time, or if DEVELOPER should be adjudged a bankrupt, make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of DEVELOPER'S insolvency, or if DEVELOPER or any of their subcontractors violate any of the
2-16
provisions of this Agreement, or if DEVELOPER fails to make prompt payment for materials or labor, or if DEVELOPER disregards laws, ordinances, or instructions of CITY, then CITY may thereafter serve written notice upon the DEVELOPER and DEVELOPER'S surety of its intention to declare this Agreement in default. Said notice shall contain the reasons for such intention to declare a default. Unless, within ten (10) days after the service of such notice, such violations shall cease and satisfactory arrangements for the corrections thereof be made ( or in the case of any violation that VvOuld require more than ten · ( 10) days to correct, DEVELOPER having commenced reasonably diligent steps towards correction within such ten (10) day period), this Agreement shall upon the expiration of said time be in default.
Upon this Agreement being in default as provided for herein, CITY shall serve written notice thereof upon the surety and DEVELOPER, and the surety shall have the right to take over and perform this Agreement. If the surety does not, within fifteen (15) days after the serving upon it of a notice of this Agreement being in default, give CITY written notice of its intention to take over and perform this Agreement or does not commence performance thereof within thirty (30) days from the date of CITY'S notice, CITY may take over the work and prosecute the same to the extent of completion it deems necessary by contract or by any other method it may deem advisable for the account and at the expense of DEVELOPER, and the surety shall be liable to CITY for any cost or other damage occasioned CITY thereby. In such ev~nt CITY may, without liability for so doing, take possession of, and utilize in completing such work, such materials, appliances, plants, and other property belonging to DEVELOPER that may be on the site of the work and be necessary therefor. Should surety fail to take over and diligently perform the Agreement upon DEVELOPER being in default under this Agreement, surety agrees to promptly on demand deposit with CITY such amount as CITY may reasonably estimate as the cost of completing all of DEVELOPER'S obligations. For any such work the CITY elects to complete by furnishing its own employees, materials, tools, and equipment, CITY shall receive reasonable compensation therefor, including costs of supervision and overhead.
In the event that DEVELOPER is in default under this Agreement, CITY may, at its option, elect not to complete any or all of the work and may elect not to accept any of the work already completed. If CITY elects not to accept any of the work, then all CITY'S obligations under this Agreement to DEVELOPER and the lands to be served shall terminate. CITY'S obligations to DEVELOPER and the lands to be served shall continue to the extent of any acceptance, subject to CITY'S right to offset any sums due the CITY.
The foregoing provisions are in addition to and not in limitation of any other rights or remedies available to CITY.
13. DELAY BY DEVELOPER: If the work is suspended or otherwise not continuously prosecuted for any cause whatsoever, within or without the time for completion, DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER'S sole cost and expense, remove and replace all or any portion of the work already completed and inspected which CITY, in its sole discretion, determines is or can be damaged as a result of being in place while the work is suspended or otherwise not continuously being prosecuted.
14. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS: Should CITY engage an attorney to enforce any provision of this Agreement or to defend any claim brought by anyone arising out of the failure of DEVELOPER to perform any of DEVELOPER'S obligations under this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall pay all of CITY'S attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith, with or without suit, whether or not said attorneys are in the regular employ of the CITY.
2-17
15. REIMBURSEMENT: Provided DEVELOPER has fully complied with all the terms of this Agreement, CITY shall, without interest, reimburse DEVELOPER to the extent set forth on a separate Reimbursement Schedule. DEVELOPER accepts as the amount and conditions governing DEVELOPER'S entitlement to reimbursement and refund under CITY'S existing rules, regulations, ordinances, and policies. If no amount is specified in Schedule A, DEVELOPER is to receive no reimbursement from CITY.
16. FUTURE CHARGES: Nothing in this Agreement shall relieve DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER'S successors or assigns of any obligation to pay any connection, installation, expansion or other fees, charges, or other expenses, including operation and maintenance expenses, required under any present or future established ordinances, rules, regulations and policies of CITY.
17. ASSIGNMENT: The performance of the Agreement may not be assigned except upon the written consent of CITY. Consent will not be given to any proposed assignment which would relieve DEVELOPER, or DEVELOPER'S sureties of their responsibilities under the Agreement unless CITY finds that assignee can perform this Agreement and provide security comparable to that provided by DEVELOPER.
18. NOTICE: All notices required hereunder shall be deemed served or given upon the earlier of actual receipt or deposit in the U.S. Postal Service, first class postage prepaid, addressed to DEVELOPER at the address set forth below, to the surety at the address in the security instrument, and to CITY at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California 92270.
[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
2-18
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS (Limited Partnership/ General Partnership/ Corporation)
1. WHERE PRINCIPAL IS A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
A. General Partner shall execute on behalf of the limited partnership.
B. General Partner shall furnish City of Rancho Mirage a copy of the recorded Certificate of Limited Partnership to authenticate the authority of the General Partner to sign on behalf of the limited partnership.
2. WHERE PRINCIPAL IS A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
A. General Partner shall execute on behalf of general partnership.
B. General Partner shall furnish City of Rancho Mirage a copy of the General Partnership Agreement authenticating that the General Partner who signs the document has authority to do so.
3. WHERE PRINCIPAL ts A CORPORATION
A. Officer or officers shall execute on behalf of corporation.
B. Officers shall furnish City of Rancho Mirage a copy of a corporate resolution indicating that the officer or officers who sign the document are the officers of the corporation and authorized to bind the corporation to contract. Corporation requires two signatures.
For example, John Doe may sign on behalf of either partner-ship or the corporation as the General Partner and/or president thereof, but then, in addition, John Doe is required to sign the document individually as an individual obliger.
4. WHERE PRINCIPAL IS A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CLLC) A. Agreement may be executed as follows:
1. By any member, unless the articles of organization or operating agreement provide otherwise;
2. By any manager; if LLC is manager-managed, unless the articles of organization or operating agreement provide otherwise; or
3. By any officer, if the operating agreement provides for the appointment of officers, unless the articles of organization or operating agreement provide otherwise.
B. The individual(s) executing the agreement shall provide certified copies of the LLC's articles of organization and operating agreement.
2-19
/;;-/.'
By: !d/ltui'u
(Authorized Representative of CITY)
.., S. Dana I lobe rt : Ma yor
TeJWe., II,
Approved as to form :
By:c;L{t!_~
r-o r Steven B . Quintanilla, Ci ty Attorn ey
u~ ~a..A\ler -~o~\c., Oep..>\-'-f Ci\7 A\\o \.J
ATTEST:
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
(S EAL IF CORPORATION)
Address: 357-f / &t+Clv11-r:Dc H IJ/o
folu De.Jeri CA 1zi11
Telephone No. {711 o) bl/I -lfll?z
By : ____________ _
Address : __________ _
Telephone: _________ _
By: ____________ _
Address : __________ _
Telephone No. ________ _
(SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARI Z ED)
(Seal: Partnershi~rpora tion)
DEVELOPER: {A~ .
E:\Shared\RNCH\0007-13 General Matters\DOC\5066 -Desert Estate Builders LLC (SIA) (TM 35089) (03-09-2021 ).dOC)(
2-20
CALIFORNIA A C KNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189
~IOOIIJIOOOOOOIJOIDl8000:00IQIJCO:IJIOl()ffl)ll]C(l(tJU)l,fl(~~~ICOOlOO A notary public or othe r officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to wh ich this certificate is attached , and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California }
County of f'.\\fA5i/1,€,
On 05 { (v{Z.OZ✓\ before me.\<455t{}tiltj l-£,llj I l\)ikciM ~,16)1 (~ · Dote J . Here Insert Nome and Title of th e\,O fficer personally appeared -----+-a~ ___ D __ rn __ '_,__-_________________ _ who proved t o me o n t he b as i s of satisfactory ev idence to br the person(s) w hose name(s) e subscribed to th e w ithin instrument a nd acknowl edged tQ. me tha@t ~e/[hey executed the same In ~r/t,eir au tho rize d capacl ty(l es), and that b,@i(er1tfe1r signature (s) on the instrume n t the person(s), or the entity upon be half of whic h t he p erson (s) acted, executed the Ins trument.
KASSANDRA LEY '1
Notary Publlc • Californ ia i.
Riverside County !
.. ~ Commission It 2306032
•,·,.o••'• My Com m. f.xplres Sep 20, 2023
~--1?-<:·~~•ti,,"'l!S -
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the
laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
OPTIONAL
Completing this information con deter alteration of th e document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.
Desc ription of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: __________________________ _ Document Date: ____________________ Number of Pages : ___ _ Signer(s) Other Th a n Named Above: ______________________ _ Capacity(ie s) Claimed by Sign er(s)
Signer's N am e: ___________ _
□ Corporate Officer -Tltle(s): ______ _
□ Partner -o Limited o General
D Individual
□ Trustee
□ Attorney in Fact
□ Guardian or Con servator
D Other: · ______________ _
Signer is Representing: ________ _
©2019 National Notary Association
Signer's Name:
□ Corporate Officer -Title(s): ______ _
□ Partner -□ Lim ited □ General
□ Individual □ Attorney in Fact
□ Trustee □ Guardian or Conservator
□ Oth e r:
Signer is Representing : ________ _
M1304-09 (11/20)
2-21
SCHEDULE A
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
This schedule is attached to and made a part of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement between CITY and DEVELOPER for the above-referenced property.
1. Completion Date: May 1, 2023
2. General Liability
$2,000,000
$1,000
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
Automobile Liability
Combined Single Limit
Workers Compensation
Each Occurrence (Includes Bodily Injury and Property Damage) Medical Expense
Personal & Advertising Injury
General Aggregate
Products-Completed/Operations Aggregate
$1,000,000 each accident, $2,000,000 Aggregate
Statutory
3. Approved Security Amounts:
(To be posted prior to acceptance of improvements) -........aa.==..;:;.;::;....;..;.a:;~---/ Grading Bond (Total Security minus Cash Deposit) $ 339,331.00 v Performance (on-site) ( 100%) $ ___ 4 __ 9 __ 9,--=-0--64""'""'.--00=----~ Payment (on-site) (50%) $ 249,532.00 v'
Performance (off-site) (100%) $ 328,288.00 ~
Payment (off-site) (50%) $ 164 144.00 V/
Monumentation ~$ _____ 8, .... 0 ..... 00_. ___ oo~--~tL.-
4. Bond Substitute Acceptable: Yes No
5. Deposit/Fee Amount See attachment to this schedule
6. Warranty/Performance (15%)
Security Amount: ............................................ . ..... $ _1--=2 ....... 4 ...... 1 ___ 02 __ .o ___ o _____ / (To be in place at acceptance of work)
7. Contractor(s):
Name and Address
Reimbursement: SN/ A
Jtil Initials o
DEVELOPER
CLASS A
License No. Phase of Work
REPRESENTATIVE
(If an amount is specified, see separate
schedule.)
~J) Initials of DEVELOPER or
( ) DEVEL PER REPRESENTATIVE
::::-JL 1-Date J ------------
2-22
ATTACHMENT TO SCHEDULE A
OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
Applicable fees/deposits payable by DEVELOPER prior to or concurrent with this agreement are as follows:
FEES NONREFUNDABLE
Plan Check Fee $11,245.00
(Final Map, Rough Grading, Hydrology Study,
Onsite Streets & Storm Drain, Offsite Streets & Storm
Drain)
Inspection Fees $17,888.80
(Grading, PM10, Onsite Improvements, Offsite
Improvements)
Parkland Fees
Final Map Filing Fee
CFO Annex Fee
$7,406.10
$352.00
$3,126.00
TOTAL NONREFUNDABLE FEES $40,017.90
FEES REFU NDABLE
Cash Grading Deposit $20,000.00
Dust Control Deposit $18,800.00
TOTAL REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS $38,800.00
In accordance with Section 7 of this agreement, costs incurred by CITY in excess of deposit shall be billed to DEVELOPER; if less, CITY will refund.
~Initials of CITYA~RESENTATIVE
DEVELOPER (JJ y ------------
Initials of DEVELOPER
DEVEOPER REPRESENTATIVE
Date _)_._/ /_1,-_( ·_-z,,_{ __
2-23
ATTACHMENT TO SCHEDULE A
OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTAGREEMENT
SEC URITY CALC ULATIONS
TM 35089 (Bellavia)
Estimates for Bonding Purposes
Grading
Site Grading -including 6' garden wall and tubular
steel view fence ($227,672 estimate w/ contingency
x 30%, per Municipal Code)
Landscaping
Irrigation
Subtota l
(-) Cash Deposit
Total Grading Bond
Onsite Improvements
(-)
Street Improvements (paving, decorative pavement,
curb and gutter, curb inlet catch basins, sidewalk,
etc.)
Storm Drain Improvements
Water and Sewer
Subtotal
( +) 15% contingency
Total Performance Bond (Onsite Improvements)
Payment Bond = 50% of Performance Bond
Total Payment Bond (Onsite Improvements)
Offsite Improvements
Street Improvements (pavement removal, paving,
asphalt grindings, sidewalk, curb and gutter, curb
inlet catch basin, curb ramps, etc.)
Storm Drain Improvements
Water and Sewer
Subtotal
(+) 15% contingency
Total Performance Bond (Offsite Improvements)
Payment Bond = 50% of Performance Bond
Total Payment Bond (Offsite Improvements)
Monumentation Bond
$ 68,301.00
$ 188,145.00
$ 102,885.00
$ 359,331.00
$ 20,000.00
$ 339,331.00
$ 189,894.00
$ 13,360.00
$ 230,715.00
$ 433,969.00
$ 65,095.00
$ 499,064.00
$ 249,532.00
$ 153,343.00
$ 3,860.00
$ 128,265.00
$ 285,468.00
$ 42,820.00
$ 328,288.00
$ 164,144.00
$ 8,000.00
2-24
Estimate for Inspection Fees
Onsite Inspection Fees Due {3% of Performance
Bond Total, Adjusted for Water & Sewer
Improvements not inspected by City) $ 6,757.00
Onsite Inspection Fees Due (3% of Performance
Bond Total, Adjusted for Water & Sewer
Improvements not inspected by City) $ 4,896.00
Grading Inspection Fee $ 2,175.00
PM10 Inspection Fee (Subdivision) $ 4,060.80
2-25
BOND NO. : PB 030283 00177
BOND FEE: $200.00
SCHEDULE B
BOND
PERFORMANCE SECURITY
SURVEY OF MONUMENTS
Map No. 35089
( California Government Code §§ 66499 and 66499. 1)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of California ("City") and Desert Estate Builders LLC, a California Limited Liability Company ("Principal"), have entered into an agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 66462 whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated improvements, which said agreement, dated May 1, 2021, and identified as Subdivision Improvement Agreement 35089 ("Agreement"}, is hereby incorporated by this reference as though set forth at length, and have agreed pursuant to Section 66499 of the Government Code to execute this bond to secure the performance of the following obligation:
Principal hereby agrees to install survey monuments in accordance with any terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, permit and the requirements and specifications of all applicable laws and ordinances. Said installation shall be completed on or before May 1, 2023, or as otherwise provided by any lawful extension of time granted by the City Council.
WHEREAS, we, the Principal and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company , as surety ("Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto the City, in the penal sum of Eight Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($8,000.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, should Principal fail to install survey monum~nts in accordance with any terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, permit and the requirements and specifications of all applicable laws and ordinances and/or should Principal fail to complete said installation of survey monuments within the time period prescribed therein or otherwise provided by any lawful extension of time granted by the City Council, the City may, at its option, cause all required work to be done in the manner required herein, and the parties executing this bond shall be firmly bound for the payment of all necessary costs therefore.
NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal and Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City, in the penal sum of Eight Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($8,000.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the foregoing work, on his or their part, to be kept and performed
2-26
at the time and in the manner specified above, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, at least until the time City accepts the work required to be performed by Principal under the Agreement, notwithstanding whether or not Principal should abandon its obligations under the Agreement without having commenced construction of any improvements and whether such abandonment arises from foreclosure upon Principal's property or otherwise .
As part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the work to be performed hereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the scope of work to be performed or to the specifications.
[THIS PORTION OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
2-27
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Principal and Surety named herein, on May 20 , 20~.
~RINCIPAL
DESERT ESTATE BUILDERS, LLC
• Company
~~~~""'-l:i-P--64-.::t--!!/--r-µ_,1,14,;L.u..i..r.J-l:..!.J'V..:+. r...:.Jl)ltJft,t,/}dd_5751 Gateway Drive, H810, Palm Desert , California 92211 Address
By
City Signature
rgnature
L \~ we~\Jev -~ewe,.~ I~~, L\\°'I Mo-s:NN
Name, Title
Ra\"L\r\u t\,\f G °f "
City
SUBDIVISION DOCUMENTS\Bond -Monument (10.06.09).doc
Name
Title
SURETY
PHILADELPHIA IND EM NITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Company
00, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004 -1403
Attorney-in-Fact
Title
*Note: Principal and Surety's
signatures must be notarized and 3
originals must be executed.
Si t!~ ~
t. e /or;r cl e, Cc/el C, Y7 P"!f /J?ee,,I'
JJ().-~
2-28
CALIFORNIA JURAT WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 ~r,~~~~ifflOO't8<{-!lllm<OO®Ol!l$f~ll,£~00$ll~~~~~~1®8
D See Attached Document (Notary to cross out lines 1-6 below) D See Statement Below (Lines 1-6 to be completed on ly by document signer[s], not Notary) : Qt r{cl IV~ an ~ _Se cu r ti 1 1 ~· v1 r VJ:y o{ _ fV1 ovhlJ~11 f s 2 P.-er Po nvt.4'..r'l --.ft'. _Sj__ t'tJl') 't -1 · t ~ 0.Y if ty -~+-VV\_{)(l(,tj/vt-8vl;f S' '.l Pe d ~-Q{];~tAvt CL --.s e,t(,,Ly...l .\-y _ I _ )~\,(V ~u -Of _W),-Qv.t ltJ.:Y':t•&tfJ. 11 Signature of Document Signer No. 2 (if any)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verif ies on ly the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached , and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of Cal ifornia Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me County of _t,_-,_✓'-~~\'-'-~ (.,._\"""{,'------
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
on this ;J.-1.-\ day of '{'(\~ , 20 2...\ ,
by Date Mth Year
(and (2) ______________ ),
Name(:j! of Signer(s)'
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(s) who appeared before me.
Signature __ _,_(-""'"'"1""''6 ... A""'. ,___,_, .L.),di'-',._,l"'~...,q .,,L,b(.,__\""_fl."",,,,"""'°_,,. __ _ Signature of Notary Public
~---------------OPTIONAL ----------------,
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document ----'------------------------- Document Date: _________________ Number of Pages: ______ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ______________________ _ l:l~OIIJ!~!---~~OO&.~!~OOJ!l'l'fJ#l-$1."l:{l,i.mf~8~~&100ll}l8'lf};{l~~lioo:o8 ©2019 National Notary Association
M1304-08 (09/19)
2-29
State of
County of
COLORADO
ARAPAHOE
)
) ss .
)
On May 20, 2021, before me , a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Douglas J. Rothey · known to me to be Attorney-in -Fact of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behalf of the said corporation, and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year stated in this certificate above.
My Commission Expires: December 8, 2022
CYNTHIA M . BURNETT
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY 10 19944019211
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 8, 2022
2-30
PHILADELPIIlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
One Bala Plaza, Suite 100
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004-0950
Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That PHIIADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY (the Company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, does hereby constitute and appoint DOU GL AS .J. ROTHEY. ZACH AR Y ROTHEY, KIMBERLY PAYTO N ANJ> CYNTHI A M. BURN ETI OF SURESC APE INSURAN CE SERVICF.S. Ll ,C . its true and lawful Attorney-In-fact with full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of Indemnity and writings obligatory In the nature thereof, issued in the course of its business and to bind the Company thereby, In an amount not to exceed $50,000,000.
This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of PI-DLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMP ANY on the 14th of November, 2016.
RESOLVED:
FURTHER
RESOLVED:
That the Board of Directors hereby authorizes the President or any Vice President of the Company : (I) Appoint Attorney(s) in Fact and authorize the Attorney(s) in Fact to execute on behalf of the Company bonds and undertakings, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof and to attach the seal of the Company thereto; and (2) to remove , at any time, any such Attorney-in-Fact and revoke the authority given . And , be it .
That the signatures of such officers and the seal of the · Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or certificate relating thereto by facsimile , and any such Power of Attorney so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached.
rN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, PI-IlLADELPHIA INDEMNITY rNSURANCB COMPANY HAS CAUSED TI-DS INSTRUMENT TO BE SIGNED AND ITS CORPORA'r.': Si':::ALTO BE AFFIXED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICE THIS 27m DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 . (Seal)
Robert D. O'Leary Jr., President & CEO
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
On this 27 th day of October, 2017 , before me came the individual who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally known, and being by me duly sworn said that he is the therein described and authori zed officer of the PHILADELPIDA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY; that the seal affixed to said instrument is th e Corporate seal of said Company; that the said Corporate .seal and his signature were duly affixed .. (Notary Seal)
Notary Public :
residing at:
My commission expires:
Bala Cynwyd, PA
Se ptemb er 25. 2021
l, Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY , do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution of the Board of Directors and the Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto on the 27 th day of October, 2017 are true and correct and are still in full force and effect I do further certify that Robert D. O 'Leary Jr., who executed the Power of Attorney as President, was O!l th e date of execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected President of PI-DLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY .
In Testimony Whereof! have subscribed my name and affixed the facsimile seal of each Company this 20th day of ___ M_a...,y'------' 20 ~- Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary
PIIlLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
2-31
BOND NO. : PB 030283 00178
BOND FEE: $8,483.00 ·
BOND
PERFORMANCE SECURITY
GRADING
Map No. 35089
(California Government Code §§ 66499 and 66499. 1)
-
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of California ("City") and Desert Estate Builders LLC, a California Limited Liability Company ("Principal"), have entered into an agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 66462 whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated improvements, which said agreement, dated May 1, 2021, and identified as Subdivision Improvement Agreement 35089 ("Agreement"), is hereby incorporated by this reference as though set forth at length, and have agreed pursuant to Section 66499 of the Government Code to execute this bond to secure the performance of the following obligation:
Principal hereby agrees to conduct its grading activities in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by MSA Consulting, Inc., the terms, and conditions set forth in the grading permit issued by the Office of the City 1 Engineer, and all applicable laws and ordinances.
WHEREAS, we, the Principal and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company , as surety ("Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto the City, in the penal sum of Three Hundred Thirty Nine Thousand Three Hundred Thirty One Dollars and Zero Cents ($339,331.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, should Principal fail to conduct its grading activities in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by MSA Consulting, Inc., the terms and conditions set forth in the grading permit issued by the Office of the City Engineer, the Agreement, and all applicable laws and ordinances, the City may, at its option, cause all required work to be done in the manner required herein and the parties executing this bond shall be firmly bound for the payment of all necessary costs therefor.
NOWTHEREFORE, we, the Principal and Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City, in the penal sum of Three Hundred Thirty Nine Thousand Three Hundred Thirty One Dollars and Zero Cents ($339,331.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the foregoing activity, on his or their part, to be kept and performed
2-32
at the time and in the manner specified above, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, at least until the time City accepts the work required to be performed by Principal under the Agreement, notwithstanding whether or not Principal should abandon its obligations under the Agreement without having commenced construction of any improvements and whether such abandonment arises from foreclosure upon Principal's property or otherwise.
As part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees , incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered .
Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the work to be performed hereunder or the specifications accompanying the same, or any matters unknown to Surety which might affect Surety's risk, shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the scope of the work to be performed or to the specifications. [THIS PORTION OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
2-33
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Principal and Surety named herein, on May 20 , 20~.
~~O=CONTEN-"Fr /RINCIPAL
_ _.ff'-'-)I_~ L;_.__ ________ -4P~ .2 DESERT ESTATE BUILDERS, LLC .,.Signature , Vh ft • 1 Company "--':JtiM..: 'I?,&¾/ t rrtti(I IU{ltU/ 1 ' \U'IH?~ 35751 Gateway Drive, H810, Palm Desert, California 92211 ,_tJame Title UJ J ...J Address rttln,, 12el'f r+-_s"-y ________ _ City Signature
ignature
\Jsq 1M eC1.\l {V -~<:i wu'L., Q~"-\ C'\t'f k\cj 'tQ~
Name, Title
M r'lh o MiCw<=f
City
SUBDIVISION DOCUMENTS\Bond -Grading (10.06.09).doc
Name
Title
SURETY
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Company
Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004-1403 Ad ~ :u ~rgna1ur&¥/[
Douglas J. Rothey
Name
Attorney-in-Fact
Title
~Note: Prine/pal and Surety's
signatures must be notarized and 3
originals must be executed.
2-34
CALIFORNIA JURAY WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 l0l0l!l~~~~~f~Oi~l»l!l~ffi{OO®H11!}:!tl1fi~J~~l~n:OO:~
□ See Attached Document (Notary to cross out lin es 1-6 below) □ See Statement Below (Lines 1-6 to be completed only by document signer[s], not Notary) I _e-e_ cF.?')'1'\0:~l~_ <sJ(!,\_"-1.~ 1r . I __ G(t\J 1 ~,J :i f tf F~ _nvta _L11_~ S_ttlw , + ~1 f--Gr ({._A t i,~ :i Pe Lfv!1'0.-~t\,:_lt, _ ~-t c\~d½y __ 1 ___ 0 -~ l0:j : __ H{fL4/g""'n-+'a-1-t-u-r e_o_f _D_o_c _um_e_n_:-s -,g-n_e_r _N_o __ -1-- ----------------------
Signature of Document Signer No. 2 (if any)
A notary public or other officer completing this cert if icate verifies only the identity of the individual who sign ed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
Subscr ib ed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me
on this )v\ day of
by Date
(and (2) -=--=-=---=-=-:::...·:::...· =·-·=-::·-============-:
Nam e(sJ' of Sign e r(lSJ ,.,..
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(s) who appeared before me.
n .. ,11,-~ I.~
Signature --~~~~~--~Jl~ ..... \~,i~· ~1 ~:r-<\~O~Y!\_' ~--- Signature of Notary Public
.------------------OPTIONAL ---------------~
Completing this information can deter a l teration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.
Description of Attached Document
Tit le or Type of Document: __________________________ _ Document Date: _________________ Number of Pages: ______ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: _______________________ _ ffi~~~!¾OOl~~~~~~~~~~ffl~~
©2019 National Notary Association
M1304-08 (09/19)
2-35
State of
County of
COLORADO
ARAPAHOE
)
) ss .
)
On May 20, 2021, before me, a Notary Public in and for sa id County and State, residing therein , duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Douglas J. Rothey known to me to be Attorney-in -Fact of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behalf of the said corporation , and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year stated in this certificate above. ·
My Commission Expires: December 8, 2022
CYNTHIA M. BURNETT
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY 10 19944019211
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 8, 2022
2-36
PHILADELPIIlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMJ'ANY
One Bala Plaza, Suite 100
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004-0950
Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY (the Company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws ofthe Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, does hereby constitute and appoint DO UGLAS ,L ROTHEY. ZACHARY ROTHEY. KIMBERLY PAXTON AN D CYNTHIA M. BURNETI' OF SURESCA PI} INSURANCE SERVICES. LLC. its true and lawful Attorney-In-fact with full authority to execute on Its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of indemnity and writings obligatory In the nature thereof, Issued in the course of its business and to bind the Company thereby, In an amount not to exceed $50,000.000.
This Power of Attorney is gr anted and is signed nnd seated by facsimil e under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of PHILADE LPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY on the 14m ofNov cmb,:r, 2016 . .
RESOLVED:
FURTIIER
RESOLVED:
That the Board of Directors hereby authorizes the President or anY, Vice President of the Company :(!) Appoint Attomey(s) in Fact and authorize the Attomey(s) in Fact to execute on behalf of the Company bonds and undertakings , contracts of indemnity and othe r writings obligatory in the nature thereof and to attach the seal of the Company thereto; and (2) to remove, at any time, any such Attorney-in-Fact and revoke the authority given. And , be it
That the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, PHILADELPIIlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY HAS CAUSED THIS INSTRillvlENT TO BE SIGNED AND ITS CORPORATE SEA.I.TO BE AFFIXED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICE THIS 27m DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017. (Seal)
Robert D. O'Leary Jr ., President & CEO
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
On this 27th day of October, 2017, before me came the individual who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally known , and being by me duly sworn said that he is the therein described and authorized officer of the PJilLADELPlllA INDEl\-lNITV INSURANCE COMPANY ; that the seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate seal of said Company; that the said Corporate Seal and his signature were duly affixed.
I -~!:'!'/';l'a'Jl"lWoXflO."',
'°'°'O.,, 1..owu1'/odon l 111p .. llollll)ome,yC:
M1Commh1iane1Wn hp!. tS. " .
(Notary Seal)
Notary Public :
residing at:
My commission expires:
Bal a Cy nwyd, PA
September 25. 2021
I , Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary of PHI LADELPH1A INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution of the Board of Directors and the Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto on the 27 th day of October, 2017 are true and correct and are still in full force and effect I do further certify that Robert D. O'Leary Jr ., who executed the Power of Attorney as President, was on the date of execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected President of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY.
In Testimony Wl:Jereof I have subs cribed my name and affixed the facsimile seal of each Company this 20th day of ___ M_8__,Y'------, 20 ~- Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
2-37
BONO NO.: PB 030283 00179
BOND FEE: $12,477.00
BOND
PERFORMANCE SECURITY
S UB DIVI S ION IMP ROV EM E NTS (ON -S ITE )
Map No. 35089
( California Government Code §§ 66499 and 66499. 1)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of California ("City") and Desert Estate Builders LLC, a California Limited Liability Company ("Principal"), have entered into an agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 66462 whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated improvements, which said agreement, dated May 1, 2021, and identified as Subdivision Improvement Agreement 35089 ("Agreement"), is hereby incorporated by this reference as though set forth at length; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of said Agreement, Principal is required before commencing performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient bond for the faithful performance of said Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company ("Surety") is a Pennsylvania corporation and duly licensed to conduct general surety business in the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, we, Principal and Surety, are held firmly bound unto the City in the performance of the aforesaid Agreement in the penal sum of Four Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand Sixty Four Dollars and Zero Cents ($499,064.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made , we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors, and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if Principal, its heirs, executors, administrators,. successors, or assigns, shall in all things to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provides, on his or her part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect at least until the time City accepts the work required to be pertormed by Principal under the . Agreement, notwithstanding whether or not Principal should abandon its obligations under the Agreement without having commenced construction of any improvements and whether such abandonment arises from foreclosure upon Principal's property or otherwise.
As part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees , incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
2-38
Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of said Agreement or the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications . [THIS PORTION OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
2-39
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Principal and Surety named herein, on May 20 , 20~.
--A-P~AS TO GON!fENT. ~RINCIPAL ·
__ UUr:J.--.JC--+------------DESERT ESTATE BUILDERS, LLC Signatu~ . , !lr.... b Company
tfl._.\.{11.1-1,, t1
1 /'1{JJ;itt'J{,!ff I' llal,1 ~ 4 ...-35751 Gateway Drive, H810, Palm Desert, California 92211 iN::ie, Title " / V . Address 1tCJ.ht1ti !?efefl---: · _sy ___________ _ c~ ~ ~~~re APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~·~
igriaiure
L\~ )\l(lu\)e'f -~CM\u'i. ~et>,>~ c\\'\ ~tei\'e.'i
Name, Title
RcA ~c bo t\, 'f O.Q.(2..
City 7
Subdivision Improvements On-Site (10.06.09).doc
Affro ve.d As To &duf-:
~?~
Name
Title
SURETY
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Company
Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004-140'.3 ---------,------A Attorney-in-Fact
Title
Note: Principal and Surety's
signatures must be notarized and 3
originals must be executed.
-s-r.-c:~-r-....., t.t.n?
/-t!!--( a--~ d 1=. Co/e I C ;17 G151/leer
NC(_,,~
2-40
CALIFORNIA JURAT WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 '#llA:{rlOO!{~:iffl<,f~{J\'!~~~lf~8~~~™~i~~4~~11<'kfill!I!~~ □ See Attached D9cument (Notary to cross out lines 1-6 below) □ See Statement Below (Lines 1-6 to be completed only by document signer[s), not Notary) , 5µ6,/,~11', ~re ~, ;fol(( t1-<£tf/J -(Oil -,~, k) ·
:2 0r.6.a r:: __ (Ve Pt /l;./ tI /ctl J . _ _ __ _
3 S-t ,~)\).t1k!'.L~_~f_1 __ j 0 f tf{(~~t::_l}f_ ~ l l ~ :-.. ?'il()._ 11 i~d):J..L'q __ v.i;v 1.0L 111t0-errcds -
'.1 -~vd2 Ai : :) -l/h f1"/ll[l/1Vll,'l (.f-S --~. { D v1-_ r/ le J ---__:.-------,.. '1 ---,..---,-,'-4--=J-===---------
Signature of Document Signer No. 2 (if any)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me
(and (2) --------,.----====---~~--),
Nom e(sf of Signe!fer
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(s) who appeared before me.
Signature _ _.,,,Q.,_t\.-L~;·C-----.1.,.,_h,__,~,__.,,-, ~<~£~c~r~,t2~v:~✓-'~-- Signature of Notary Public
~----------------OPTIONAL ---------------~
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to on unintended document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: _________________________ _
Document Date: ________________ Number of Pages: ______ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ______________________ _ ~~j(~~JM~~~~~~O-'{lif«fl11Mt$8-'l¼l1(f~OO!f}
©2 019 National Notary Association
M1304-08 (09/19)
2-41
State of
County of
COLORADO
ARAPAHOE
)
) ss .
)
On May 20, 2021, before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Douglas J. Rothey known to me to be Attorney-in-Fact of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behalf of the said corporation, and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year stated in this certificate above.
My Commission Expir~s: December 8, 2022
CYNTHIA M. BURNETT
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 19944019211
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 8, 2022
2-42
PHILADELPHlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
One Bala Plaza, Suite 100
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004-0950
Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY (the Company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, does hereby constitute and appoint DOUGLAS ,J. ROTl{EY. ZACHARY ROTHEY; KIMBERLY PAYTON AND CYNTHIA M. BURNETT OF SUR ESCAPE INSURANCE SERVICES, U ,C. its true and lawful Attorney-In-fact with full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of indemnity and writings obligatory in the nature thereof, Issued in the course of its business and to bind the Company thereby, In an amount not to exceed ~50.0D0,000 .
This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of PIDLADELPHlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY on the 141h of November, 2016.
RESOLVED:
FURTHER
RESOLVED:
That the Board of Directors hereby authorizes the President or any Vice President of the Company: (I) AppointAttomey(s) in Fact and authorize the Attomey(s) in Fact to execute on behalf of the Company bonds and undertakings, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof and to attach the seal of the Company thereto; and (2) to remove, at any time, any such Attorney-in-Fact and revoke the authority given. And , be it
That the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, PHILADELPIDA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY HAS CAUSED THIS INSTRUMENT TO BE SIGNED AND ITS CORPORA TE S EAL TO BE AFFIXED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICE THIS 27TI! DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017. (Seal)
Robert D. O'Leary Jr., President & CEO
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
On this 27 th day of October, 2017, before me came the individual who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally known, and being by me duly sworn said that he is the therein described and authorized officer of the PHILADELPIIlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY; that the seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate seal of said Company; that the said Corporate Seal and his signature were duly affixed. (Notary Seal)
Notary Public:
residing at:
My commission expires:
Bala Cynwyd , PA
Sentember 25 2021 .
1, Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary of PffiLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution of the Board of Directors and the Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto on the 27 th day of October, 2017 are true and correct and are still in full force and effect I do further certify that Robert D . O'Leary Jr ., who executed the Power of Attorney as President, was on the date of execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected President of PIDLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY.
In Testimony Whereof I have subscribed my name and affixed the facsimile seal of each Company this 20th day of ___ M_a_y~----, 20 ~- Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMP ANY
2-43
BOND NO. : PB 030283 00179
BOND FEE: Included in Cost
of Performance Bond BOND
PAYMENT SECURITY
LABOR AND MATERIAL {ON-SITE)
Map No .. 35089
(California Government Code§§ 66499 and 66499.2)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of California ("City") and Desert Estate Build.ers LLC, a California · Limited Liability Company ("Principal"), have entered into an agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 66462 whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated improvements, which said agreement, dated May 1, 2021, and identified as Subdivision Improvement Agreement 35089 ("Agreement"), is hereby incorporated by this reference as though set forth at length; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of said Agreement, Principal is required before commencing performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City to secure claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code; and
WHEREAS, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company ("Surety") is a Pennsylvania corporation and duly licensed to conduct general surety business in the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, Principal and Surety, their heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, are held firmly bound unto the City and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid Agreement and referred to in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code in the sum of Two Hundred Forty Nine Thousand Five Hundred Thirty Two Dollars and Zero Cents ($249,532.00) lawful money of the United States for material furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount herein above set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
Surety agrees that it shall pay the amounts due City and diligently perform the Agreement upon Principal's default after notice and within the time specified in the Agreement. If Surety fails to perform within the times specified in the Agreement, Surety shall promptly on demand deposit with City such amount as City may reasonably estimate as the cost of completing all of Principal's obligations. Surety's obligation for payment herein shall extend, notwithstanding any controversy between Principal and City regarding Principal's failure under the Agreement. Principal and Surety agree that any payment by Surety pursuant to this paragraph should be conclusively presumed between the parties herein to relieve, as demanded, Surety's obligation herein and shall be deemed proper payment as between Principal and Surety.
2-44
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, at least until the time City accepts the work required to be performed by Principal under the Agreement, notwithstanding whether or not Principal should abandon its obligations under the Agreement without having commenced construction of any improvements and Whether such abandonment arises from foreclosure upon Principal's property or otherwise.
Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of said Agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
[THIS PORTION OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
2-45
IN WITNESS WH EREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Principal and Surety named herein, on May 20 , 20-3.!_.
--APPR~AS---1'0-eetfEEN.T:!:::. /RINCIPAL a A -_ p DESERT ESTATE BUILDERS. LLC Sj.Qnature ' fh • ,/J/1 ~ • Company l«~t tl.44 fl~, fit1 ,l!lfl1,-1 f ,w1t bl!r 35751 Gateway Drive, H810, Palm Desert, California 92211 Na Ttle r =-::., Address k1-tt11 Oe-.ca?f-
City
gnature
use, Wro\l ev -~MdL, Oci?J\':l c\\'-\ k¼ri'-0-\
Name, Title
&roe bo t:\,ra~e
City
SUBDIVISION DOCUMENTS\Bond -Labor and Material On-Site (10.06.09).doc B
Signature
Name
Title
SURETY
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Company
Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004-1 403 Signature
Douglas J. Ro
Name
Attorney-in -Fact
Title
*Note: Principal and Surety's
signatures must be notarized and 3
originals must be executed.
Apr rP ve.d fr_s T {!p ~J-)
-5~ c:~
L-e/ a /4 d /3, Co/ e1 C / '7 k.5'11? e e~
JJ ,_,~e_..,..,
2-46
CALIFORNIA JURAT WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 ~~~<l~mrnrnf.~f,l,~~~}~~M~'O~~~J
□ See Attached Document (Notary to cross out lines 1-6 below) □ See Statement Below (Lines 1-6 to be completed only by document signer[s], not Notary) Ll\.bl'J, pi\,A,, _l~tlf'((',A{S __
. -,-. _f\/1
ti _,__,&/l~---· ..<: -
Sig natureii?Document Signer No. 1 Signature of Document Signer No. 2 (if any) A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me
on this 2 ~\ day of '(Y\Cv~ ,20~,
by Dot e M~tl; Year
(1) 'y!.-,vijVO £)1%1)'(
(and (2) ),
NameM of Signerf:;)-""
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(s) who appeared before me.
s ig nature _(.,_\L-'1'v~(~tl-L---""'A_1_,.,.,u-=-'· .,_\(Y\.J}v.,__-=--"-'--''----- Signature of Notary Public
,-------~---~------OPTIONAL -----~-----------,
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: __________________________ _ Document Date: _________________ Number of Pages: ______ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: _______________________ _ (~~~!l.b~$fi.l,'lll}lf§l/~~lf%l~~'f~~
©2019 National Notary Association
Ml304-08 (09/19)
2-47
State of
County of
COLORADO
ARAPAHOE
)
) ss .
)
On May 20, 2021, before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Douglas J. Rothey known to me to be Attorney-in -Fact of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behalf of the said corporation, and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal , the day and year stated in this certificate above.
My Commission Expires: December 8, 2022
Notary Public
CYN THIA M. BURNETT
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 19944019211
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 8, 2022
2-48
PHILADELPIIlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
One Bala Plaza, Suite l 00
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004-0950
Power of Attorney
KNOW All PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY (the Company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, does hereby constitute and appoint DOUGLAS J. ROTHEY, ZACHARY ROTHEY, KIMBERLY PAYTON AND CYNTHIA M. BURNETT OF SURF,SCAPE INSURANCE SERVlCES, LLC, its true and lawful Attorney-In-fact with full authority to execute on Its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of indemnity and writings obligatory In the nature thereof, Issued in the course of its business and to bind the Company thereby, in an amount not to exceed $50,000,000.
This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of PfDLADELPHIA INDEMNITY CNSURANCE COMPANY on the 14"' ofNovember, 2016.
RESOLVED:
FURTHER
RESOLVED :
That the Board of Directors hereby authorizes the President or any Vice President of the Company: (1) Appoint Attomey(s) in Fact and authorize the Attomey(s) in Fact to execute on behalf of the Company bonds and undertakings, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof and to attach the seal of the Company thereto; and (2) to remove, at any time, any such Attorney-in-Fact and revoke the authority given. And, be it
That the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached .
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, PffiLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY HAS CAUSED TfDS INSTRUMENT TO BE SIGNED AND ITS CORPORATE SEAL TO BE AFFIXED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICE THIS 27m DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017. (Seal)
Robert D. O'Leary Jr., President & CEO
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurwice Company
On this 27 th day of October, 2017, before me came the individulll who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally known, and being by me duly sworn said that he is the therein described and authorized officer of the PIDLADELPIIlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY; that the seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate seal of said Company; that the said Corporate Seal and his signature were duly affixed. (Notary Seal)
Notary Public:
residing at:
My commission expires:
Bal9. Cynwyd . PA
~ptember 2s, 2021
I, Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary of PI-IlLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution of the Board of Directors and the Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto on the 27"' day of October, 201 7 are true and correct and are still in full force and effect. I do further certify that Robert D. O'Leary Jr., who executed the Power of Attorney as President, was on the date of execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected President of PfDLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY.
In Testimony Whereof! have subscribed my name and affixed the facsimile seal of each Company this ~day of ___ M_a~y _____ , 20 ~- Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary
PIIlLADELPIIlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
2-49
BOND NO. : PB 030283 00180
BOND FEE : $8,207.00
BOND
PERFORMANCE SECURITY
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS (OFF-SITE)
Map No. 35089
( California Government Code §§ 66499 and 66499. 1)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of California ("City") and Desert Estate Builders LLC, a California Limited Liability Company ("Principal"), have entered into an agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 66462 whereby Principal agrees to · install and complete certain designated improvements, which said agreement, dated May 1, 2021, and identified as Subdivision Improvement Agreement 35089 ("Agreement"), is hereby incorporated by this reference as though set forth at length; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of said Agreement, Principal is required before commencing performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient bond for the faithful performance of said Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company ("Surety") is a Pennsylvania corporation and duly licensed to conduct general surety business in the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, we, Principal and Surety, are held firmly bound unto the City in the performance of the aforesaid Agreement in the penal sum of Three Hundred Twenty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Eighty Eight Dollars and Zero Cents ($328,288.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors, and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if Principal, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provides, on his or her part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and sha ll indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect at least until the_time City accepts the work required to be performed by Principal under the Agreement, notwithstanding whether or not Principal should abandon its obligations under the Agreement without having commenced construction of any improvements and whether such abandonment arises from foreclosure upon Principal's property or otherwise.
As part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
2-50
attorney's fees, incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of said Agreement or the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications. [THIS PORTION OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
2-51
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Principal and Surety named herein, on May 20 , 2032._.
-AP:~~TO CO NTE NT :-~RINCIPAL
,,-::: DESERT ESTATE BUILDERS, LLC
Signat re (l • vn ~ I A~ _ Company (µ.,~~ 1aiflt1g1ry / I /Wt""'i" ~~:~:teway DrM>, H810 , Palm Desert, CaUfomla 92211 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~_;,.1/J~
tgnature
Li."fiC\ Wro.\H:'r -~o~~ i Oe~\:; G"'( M D<ra-t
Name, Title ·
Bt,.'fO\o M\ <" a 9r
City
Signature
Name
Title
SURETY
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Company
Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd , Pennsylvania 19004-1403 ~~et.7 1}1
Name
Attorney-in -Fact
Title
Note: Principal and Surety's
signatures must be notarized and 3
originals must be executed.
SUBDIVISION DOCUMENTS\Bond -Subdivision improvements Off-Site (10.06.09).doc -s;;; ~re-, -
t-~ud e~ Cofe1 C, f;,. E~ ... ;//lee~
N~µre_-
2-52
CALIFORNIA JURAT WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 i!~OOf~f~~~iw,~~Jl :i-t bcA N,·s1o_J __ Lm f!/_~Ji:( t~i J ____ ( o ._-( __ s l Y__ __ ,1 /11 b. 0/"-ti~o~ (Y) ?d~t'('ti _(J _( ()f' _. )
,, 5\{,p/1V 11f --/1:YJ f r O vev~t,1 J ('_ , _l'r,r Sl t~ , Signature of Document Signer No. 2 {if any)
A notary public or other officer comp leting this ce rtific ate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of Ca li fornia
County o f ~~--_\)~.W"-'-'\....,\-"-'~C..f"'-,... ___ _ Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me
on this J Li\ day of W\lt;"):
by Da te Mdht11
20 L--i ' __ ,
Year
(1) --~-'---'--\'4,-n"'-'-',___._.f),.u.Y_.,6,.:.sv\-'-'Y-,f------- (and (2) ______________ ),
Name(j} of Signer(6)
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(s) who appeared before me.
Signature
Signature of Notary Public
----------------OPTIONAL -----------------.
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: _________________________ _
Document Date: ________________ Number of Pages : ______ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ______________________ _ fl!l~~ll'~~~~ll'~'IJ~l<i.W@f~#B~~!lf~}lf~ll$8100®fl<'.ooBll}:{f,0lH{{l'.{~9'18l{!IOO ©2019 National Notary Association
M1304-08 (09/19)
2-53
State of
County of
COLORADO
ARAPAHOE
)
) ss .
)
On May 20, 2021, before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Douglas J. Rothey known to me to be Attorney-in-Fact of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behalf of the said corporation , and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year stated in this certificate above.
My Commission Expires: December 8, 2022
CYN THIA M. BURN ETT
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 19944019211
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC . 8, 2022
2-54
PHILADELPHlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
• One Bala Plaza, Suite 100
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 -09 50
Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY (the Company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, does hereby constitute and appoint DOUG LAS ,J, RO THE Y. ZAQ-fARY ROTHEY. KIMB ERL V PA YTO N AND CVNTif IA M. BURN ETT OI•' s un •:SC AP E IN SURANC E SERV ICES. LL C' its true and lawful Attorney-in-fact with full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of Indemnity and writings obligatory In the nature thereof, .Issued in the course of its business and to bind the Company thereby, in an amount not to exceed Sso.000,000.
Thi s Pow er of Attorney is granted and is signed and sea led by facsimil e und er and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of PI-D L ADELPH IA IND EMNI T Y INS URA NCE COMPA NY on the t4 lh of Novemb er, 2016.
RESOLVED:
FURTHER
RESOLVED:
That the Board of Directors hereby authorizes the President or any Vice President of the Company: (I) Appoint Attorney(s) in Fact 1111d authori ze the Attomey(s) in Fact to ex ecute on behalf of the Company bonds and undertakings , contracts of indemnity wid other writings obligatory in the nature thereof and to attach the seal of the Company thereto; and (2) to remove, at any time, any such Attorney -in-Fact and revoke the authority given. And, be it
That the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with resp ect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached . ·
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY HAS CAUSED THIS INSTRUMENT TO BE SIGNED AND ITS CORPORA TE SEAL TO BE AFFIXED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICE THIS 27rn DAY OF OCTOBER , 20 I 7. (Seal)
Robert D. O'Leary Jr ., President & CEO
Philadelphia lndemnity Insurance Company
On this 27 th day of October, 2017, before me came the individual who executed th e preceding instrument, to me personally known, and being by me duly sworn said that he is the therein described and authorized officer of the PIHLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY; that the seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate seal of said Company ; that the said Corporate Seal and his signature were duly affixed . (Notary Seal)
Notary Public:
residing at:
My commission expi res :
Bala Cynwyd, PA
Septembe r 25 , 2021
I, Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution of the Board of Directors and the Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto on the 27 th day of October, 2017 are true and correct and are still in full force and effect. I do further certify that Robert D . O'Leary Jr., who executed the Power of Attorney as President, was on the date of execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected President of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY.
In Testimony Whereof! have subscribed my name and affixed the facsimile seal of each Company this 20th day of ___ M_a~y _____ , 20 ~- Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary
PIIlLADELPRIA INDEMNITY INS URANCE COMPANY
2-55
BOND NO . : PB 030283 00180
BOND FEE : Included in Cost of
Performance Bond BOND
PAYMENT SECURITY
LABOR AND MATERIAL (O F F•SITE )
Map No. 35089
(California Government Code§§ 66499 and 66499.2)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of California ("City") and Desert Estate Builders LLC, a California Limited Liability Company ("Principal"), have entered into an agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 66462 whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated improvements, which said agreement, dated May 1. 2021, and identified as Subdivision Improvement Agreement 35089 ("Agreement"), is hereby incorporated by this reference as though set forth at length; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of said Agreement, Principal is required before commencing performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City to secure claims to which reference is made in Title 15 ( commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the. Civil Code; and
WHEREAS, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company ("Surety") is a Pennsylvania corporation and duly licensed to conduct general surety business in the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, Principal and Surety, their heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, are held firmly bound unto the City and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid Agreement and referred to in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code in the sum of One Hundred Sixty Four Thousand One Hundred Forty Four Dollars and Zero Cents ($164,144.00) lawful money of the United States for material furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount herein above set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
Surety agrees that it shall pay the amounts due City and diligently perform the Agreement -upon Principal's default after notice and within the time specified in the Agreement. If Surety fails to perform within the times specified in the Agreement, Surety shall promptly on demand deposit with City such amount as City may reasonably estimate as the cost of completing all of Principal's obligations. Surety's obligation for payment herein shall extend, notwithstanding any controversy between Principal and City regarding Principal's failure under the Agreement. Principal and Surety agree that any payment by Surety pursuant to this paragraph should be conclusively presumed between the parties herein to relieve, as demanded, Surety's obligation herein and shall be deemed proper payment as between Principal and Surety.
2-56
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void; otheiwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, at least until the time City accepts the work required to be performed by Principal under the Agreement, notwithstanding whether or not Principal should abandon its obligations under the Agreement without having commenced construction of any improvements and whether such abandonment arises from foreclosure upon Principal's property or otheiwise.
Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of said Agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
[THIS PORTION OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
2-57
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Principal and Surety named herein, on May 20 , 20.!!..
---APP~··AS =FG-GGNTEN=r-:--✓.RINCIPAL
---+-l/Jr=---_,___________ DESERT ESTATE BUILDERS, LLC
Signature . Company (4,~UA f3og 1 r (Y1Jib1(l,tjl1,V} /J?.ei,/1( ha,,....-35751 Gateway Drive , H810, Palm Desert, California 92211 rT)S , Title J' ./}:-tT 7 Address ~/L1,1 12.&s:cr-·t=_ _By ___________ _ City Signature
gnature
Lffl \cl e@ :e x -~'t , De\),mt ("'\ ~I
Name, Title
&~c.b o \:'\ ,ru~
City
SUBDIVISION DOCUMENTS\Bond -Labor and Material Off-Site (10.06 .09).doc Name
Title
SURETY
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Company
Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynv,,yd, Pennsylvania 19004-1403 Ad res
By
Signatuli
Douglas J. Rothey
Name
Attorney-in -Fact
Title
*Note: Principal and Surety's
signatures must be notarized and 3
originals must be executed.
~rtved-A~ T l~-kJ-;
~£~
___ s_G_z_.~f~-C:,-k i C,"'7 ~;vfee.,,..
~~
2-58
CALIFORNIA JURAT WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 ~~~({!!' l[jlfJlD:00.,!!1~f.l00:€{ffl!!>!J<~llfi$8<{~{llf@~~~ □ See Attached Docu ment (Notary to cross out li nes 1-6 be low) □ See Statement Below (L ines 1-6 to be comp leted only by document signer[s], not Notary) !:-t1i_R~( ___ t'.l-01 ... J!Y)_fy-f.e_(jql _)_ ..
·----
Signature of Document Signer No. 1 Signature of Document Signer No. 2 (if any) A notary public or other officer completi ng th is certificate verifies on ly the identity of the indiv idua l who signed the document to which this certificate is attached , and not the truthfu lness, accuracy, or va lidity of that document.
State of California
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me
on this J"\\ day of
~Kth
20 '1.-\ ' __ ,
by Date Year
(1) e1Vvr ~C\vyu(
(and (2) ______________ ),
Name(6) of Signer(.5)
proved to me on the basis of sat isfactory ev idence to be the person(s) who appeared before me .
Signature -~CJk-~~~-h~~~-~--1
~---
Signature of Notary Pub lic
~-------~---~---OPTIONAL --~------------~
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.
Description of Attached Document
Tit le or Type of Document: ___________________________ _ Document Date: __________________ Number of Pages: ______ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:--------~....---------------- ~~O.~~~H41l@!MMl4lllfll!~l~H~Ulll•fllfl❖f~OOl<!:l@!lm®~II0'~8$t~,O;~~ ©2019 National Notary Association
M1304-08 (09/19)
2-59
State of
County of
COLORADO
ARAPAHOE
)
) ss .
)
On May 20, 2021, before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State , residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Douglas J. Rothey known to me to be Attorney-in-Fact of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behalf of the said corporation, and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year stated in this certificate above.
My Commission Expires: December 8, 2022
Notary Public
CYN T HI A M . BURNETT
NOTARY PUBLIC .
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 19944019211
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 8, 2022
2-60
PHILADELPIDA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
One Bala Plaza, Suite 100
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004-0950
Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That PHILADELPHIA INDEMNllY INSURANCE COMPANY (the Company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, does hereby constitute and appoint DOUGLA S J. ROTHEY, ZACH ARY ROTf-IEY, KJMglERLY PAYTON AND CYNTHIA M. BURNETT OF SURESCAPE INSURANCE SERVICES, Ll ,C , its true and lawful Attorney-in-fact with full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of indemnity and writings obligatory in the nature thereof, issued in the course of its business and to bind the Company thereby, in an amount not to exceed $50,000,000.
This Powe r of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of Pl·ULADELPHIA INDBMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY on the 14th ofNove mber, 2016.
RESOLVED :
FURTIIER
RESOLVED:
That the Board of Directors hereby authorizes the President or any Vice President of the Company: (I) Appoint Attorney(s) in Fact and authorize the Attorney(s) in Fact to execute on behalf of the Company bonds and undertakings , contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof and to attach the seal of the Company thereto; and (2) to remove, at any time , any such Attorney-in -Fact and revoke the authority given. And, be it
That the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon die Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached.
IN TESTIMONY \\'HEREOF, PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY HAS CAUSED THJS INSTRUMENT TO BE SIGNED AND ITS CORPORATE SEAL TO BE AFFIXED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICE THIS 27rn DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017. (Seal)
Robert D . O'Leary Jr., President & CEO
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
On this 27 th day of October, 2017, before me came the individual who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally !mown, and being by me duly sworn said that he is the therein described and authorized officer of the PIDLADELPIIIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY; that the seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate seal of said Company; that the said Corporate Seal and his signature were duly affixed. (Notary Seal)
Notary Public :
residing at:
My commission expires:
f!a lfl Cvnw_y d, PA
September 25 , 2021
I, Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution of the Board of Directors and the Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto on the 27lli day of October, 2017 are true and correct and are still in full force and effect. I do further certify that Robert D. O'Leary Jr ., who executed the Power of Attorney as President, was on the date of execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected President of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY .
In Testimony Whereof I have subscribed my name and affixed the facsimile seal of each Company this 20th day of ___ M_a_y<-..._ ____ , 20 .3.!_.
Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary
PIDLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
2-61
BOND NO. : PB 030283 00181
BOND FEE: $3,103 .00
BOND
PERFORMANCE SECURITY
GUARANTEE REPAIR AND MAINTENANC E OF ALL IM P ROVEME NTS Map No. 35089
( California Government Code §§ 66499 and 66499. 1)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter "City"), and Desert Estate Builders LLC, a California Limited Liability Company ("Principal"), have entered into an agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 66462 whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated improvements, which said agreement, dated May 1, 2021, and identified as Subdivision Improvement Agreement 35089 ("Agreement"), is hereby incorporated by this reference as though set forth at length, and have agreed pursuant to Section 66499 of the Government Code to execute this bond to secure the performance of the following obligation :
Principal hereby agrees to guarantee the material and workmanship relative to the installation of all improvements in and adjoining subject property against all defects and to promptly perform work and supply material as required by the City which are needed to repair or replace such defective work and material.
WHEREAS, we, the Principal and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company , as surety ("Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto the City, in the penal sum of One Hundred Twenty Four Thousand One Hundred Two Dollars and Zero Cents ($124,102.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, should Principal fail to promptly repair and replace materials or work required to be done by it and in accordance with the Agreement and all applicable laws and ordinances and/or should Principal fail to complete said repair and replacement work within the time allowed by the City, the City may, at its option, cause all required work to be done in the manner required herein and the parties executing this bond shall be firmly bound for the payment of all necessary costs therefore .
NOW THEREFORE, we, the Principal and Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City, in the penal sum of One Hundred Twenty Four Thousand One Hundred Two Dollars and Zero Cents ($124,102.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Surety shall guarantee replacement and repair of improvements for a period of one (1) year following final acceptance of said improvements.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the foregoing activity, on his or their part, to be kept and performed
2-62
at the time and in the manner specified above, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, at least until the time City accepts the work required to be performed by Principal under the Agreement, notwithstanding whether or not Principal should abandon its obligations under the Agreement without having commenced construction of any improvements and whether such abandonment arises from foreclosure upon Principal's property or otherwise.
As part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the work to be performed hereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the scope of the work to be performed or to the specifications.
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
2-63
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on May , ~, 20~.
~p~: :r o OON:I:&~ /RINCIPAL
l.J__t ~ EESERT ESTATE BUILDERS, LLC
siynature , (} Company IJ.. ~ !UM ~ I fhtitALJt/¼1 Jerikv-35751 Gateway Drive, H810, Palm Desert, California 92211 , -7N,r,f), Titl e-.}! J .7 Address
f//?IM ptctr'I-= =-s '----------bty V Signature
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ci~fu~
Signature
L\§9 Weo\Jey-~cwc' '-(
Name , Title
func bD t::\,cc\~e
City
SUBDIVISION DOCUMENTS\Bond -All Improvements (10 .06.09).doc Name
Title
SURETY
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Company
8 Signatur
Douglas J . Rothey
Name
Attorney-in-Fact
Title
0, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004-14{)3
*Note: Principal and Surety's
signatures must be notarized and 3
originals must be executed.
lrffrtJVd -ks.~ tdeJ-:
~~~~
___..5-i 8"-"'-'--!we--= .
Le-,-/artd If=.-C!c/e I c .. ~ f:.Ply/~eep/\
N~
2-64
CALIFORNIA JURAT WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 8202 1$®~~'8~~ 1l~~~OO~~Il{™l~~!$~!}'.U:Oli.RO
D See Attached Document (Notary to cross out lines 1-6 below) □ See Statement Below (Lines 1-6 to be completed only by document signer[s], not Notary) , Jl:, _l;_t'lf ti,tkf x-r f 4 1( !"~ /1"-g IYJ-k ~tU I (!., of 4, /1 l 111 (rovtlA{'.,v( I ( } 0 tM {. o~V\ ·ke ref /I ~ 1 /vi, ),_ /II\ Cl / 11tt~f1 t1 fl.C( of. t1 I I I """P ( t2 VCfM/1 I j' :; .0 ll'1J .(1u1-tC_f_ --.(t f /[I_!( .ffet,e4:,,. . yv'\11 tJf/ +(.f!.d //'c{ {)/_ a// ' Wt ( r "/J v~f J . ,1
ocum e n t Signer No. Signature of Document Signer No. 2 (if any) A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me County of __ 'f-.;,_· -l_.W_~_)~C_\{~---
}•'<,\,,. ~ .~,,
~ ~•·•, CELIA GREEMAN ., .{_;,j~ Notary Public -Cali f ornia ~ 1 .,: ~ •;, ... ;tjiJ R1vers1de County ~
j \ -;,~,;;;g9 Comm ission# 2234845 l
.
1 ,_,,.0~-My Comm, Expires Mar 1.8, 2022
.,, .. tt1'-.r~· .. ~
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
on this d 1 day of _'(Y\~l)f_· l,...· ___ , 20 z,,\ ,
by Date · Mbinth Year
(and (2) _______________ ),
Name(7' of SignerM
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(s) who appeared before me.
Signature ___ Q~;l¼~=··~,/1~_1-i~Q~h'.\~lt\~<1"""....,+• __ Signature of Notary Public
~---------------OPTIONAL ~---~----------~
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: _________________________ _
Document Date: _________________ Number of Pages : ______ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ______________________ _ ~\lflffi❖!~JI0».~1~~rnrnPJ~l~™1~$tl~•Ol,~~~~OO~ll!fM~~9™li0000'11®1:M.illl~ ©2019 National Notary Association
M1304-08 (09/19)
2-65
State of
County of
COLORADO
ARAPAHOE
)
) 55.
)
On May 20, 2021, before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn; personally appeared Douglas J. Rothey known to me to be Attorney-in-Fact of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behalf of the said corporation, and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year stated in this certificate above.
My Commission Expires: December 8, 2022
CYNTHIA M. BURNETT
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID 19944019211
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC . s, 2022
2-66
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
One Bala Plaza, Suite 100
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004-0950
Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY (the Company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, does hereby constitute and appoint DO UGLA S .J. ROTHE Y. ZAC HAR Y RO THEY . KI MBERL Y PAYTO N AND CYNTHI A M. BURNETT OF SUR F,,S CA\lE INSUR ANCE SERVICES . LL C, its true and lawful Attorney-in-fact with full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of Indemnity and writings obligatory in the nature thereof, issued in the course of its business and to bind the Company thereby, in an amount not to exceed $SO ,OOQ.OOO.
This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of PI-DLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMP ANY on the 141h ofN ovember, 2016 .
RESOLVED:
FURTHER
RESOLVED:
That the Board of Directors hereby authorizes the President or any Vice President of the Company: (I) Appoint Attorney(s) in Fact and authorize the Attomey(s) in Fact to execute on behalf of the Company bonds and undertakings, contracts of indemnity and othe r writings obligatory in the nature thereof and to attach the seal of the Company thereto ; and (2) to remove, at any time, any such Attorney-in-Fact and revoke the authority given . And , be it
That the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached .
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF , Pl:DLADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY HAS CAUSED THIS INSTRUMENT TO BE SIGNED AND ITS CORPORATE SEAL TO BE AFFIXED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICE THIS 27™ DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 . (Seal)
Robert D. O'Leary Jr ., President & CEO
Philadelphia Indemnity Insll(ance Company
On this 271h day of October, 2017, before me came the individu al who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally known, and being by me duly sworn said that he is the therein described and authorized officer of the PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY; thatthe seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate seal of said Company; that the said Corporate Seal and his signature were duly affixed . · (Notary Seal)
Notary Public:
residing at :
My commission expires :
Bala Cynwyd PA
September 25 . 2021
I, Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary of PHI LADB LPl·UA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution of the Board of Directors and the Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto on the 27 th day of October, 2017 are true and correct and are still in full force and effect. I do further certify that Robert D. O'Leary Jr., who executed the Power of Attorney as President, was on the date of execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected President of PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY .
In Testimony Wh\,reof I have subscribed my name and affixed the facsimile seal of each Company this 20th day of ___ M_a_y _____ , 20 3!__.
Edward Sayago, Corporate Secretary
PHILADELPIIlA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
2-67
CERTIFICATION OF ACCURATE INSURANCE INFORMATION
I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all the information contained in the insurance certificate attached hereto is true and correct, and that I make such representation knowingly based on my own independent investigation and verification of the information stated therein. Furthermore, I acknowledge and agree that communicating or conveying information in a written instrument to the City of Rancho Mirage or to any officer,. employee or agent thereof for the purpose of obtaining any ministerial or discretionary permit, entitlement, license or privilege that I know is false or misleading is a misdemeanor punishable by fine up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) and/or up to six (6) months in jail, and in addition, shall render such permit, entitlement, license or privilege nul 1ioid. Rancho Mirage, Cal., Municipal Code §§9.12.010-
9.12.020, 14.110.100.
1/rhl i1 · · . · . ·
(Date) (Signature)
2-68
SCHEDULE "C"
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION
FROM WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
certify that, in the performance of the work required under the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, ___________ , I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California and agree that if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of the California Labor Code,~ tC,,rthwlth comply with those provisions. g, lW\. Gru,~ h t-Date: 5 ga__ '2021
Na e & Sign re
2-69
ATTACHMENT 3
EXTENSION FORM AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
2-70
Standard Agreement for Subdivision Improvements
Extension Request Form
Date: March 8, 2023
The following Tract/Parcel(s) numbers that are listed below will soon exceed the completion date according to the Standard Agreement executed on April 19, 2021.
TM 35089 (Bellavia)
To avoid the Standard Agreement from being in default and risking the loss of securities, an extension must be requested thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date, according to the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, Title 16.20.110, Completion of Improvements. Please submit a detailed construction completion schedule for the improvements along with this form, to justify the extension, within 15 days from the date above. Your request will be reviewed and, if valid, will be presented to the City Council for consideration. There will be a $500.00 administrative fee associated with the processing of the extension.
Please complete the following information:
Tract Number(s): __ 3_.::;_-_l>_tr'"""1 _______________ _ Owner(s): l)J;sJ£.tA.7 #"sr.A:,r,t BtJ I L.bf-,tl..SJ IA./C, Original Completion Date: _rVt_/l_..·y_1'"""',..__;;_J.._v_:2._.;;..3 __________ _ New Completion Date Requested:_/4 ____ :P __ /2_1 L ____________ _ Brief Reason for Extension: ~1..Ec.71(1c. f'£t.) /;"$Th~ To "i 11f'/z:,f.tr ,["/\)/11' (q47/Es if-Nb ?.iu./J-S lCIJ f/!pt1
1/IF s17x .f>~mfT/htt /tJ .J/f/VuF1--n}1 zo 2.:~. ~£fLA--c£/vlfNt, woNl' 1/x J:>£~1t1Eg_;;0 tJ/\JTl?i /ll44 -s. 2a2~ tf:T Tiff . .I 7 - :CA r<I ;l-s,, l[f<cH 1TEc,uR.+1 D&h4!t/v'45 lf.lJ£ l3EJtuG, Please send this form with supporting documentation to~'
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
69-825 HIGHWAY 111
RANCHO MIRAGE , CA 92270
ATTN: JEFF BENSON
2-71
"'~~t!..-'
DESJ~RT ESTATE BUILDERS, LLC
March 17, 2023
TO: Jeff Benson
Department f Public Works
Rancho Mirage, California 92270
Memorandum
RE: Extension of Subdivision Improvement Agreement
If the City Council grants our SIA extension, we will adhere to following schedule:
1. Order gate fabrication for all three gates ... approximately three months once the new pedestals arrive. May 5, 2023
2. Order electric service to the gates and irrigation meters once the pedestals are installed May 15, 2023
3. Order water service installation for landscaping once the pedestals are installed May 15, 2023
4. Install gates following fabrication and electrical connection September 1, 2023
5. Complete irrigation installation
September 15, 2023
6. Complete landscaping
October 15, 2023
7. Complete subdivision construction and apply for City Council acceptance.
Sincerely,
Ryan Bragg
November 1, 2023
Ryan Bragg, President
35751 Gateway Drive, Suite H810. Palm Desert, CA 92211
Tel. 760-641 -4877 [email protected]
2-72
ATTACHMENT 4
AMENDMENT OF
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
2-73
AMENDMENT OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
[TRACT MAP 35089]
This Amendment of Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("Amendment") is entered into as of April 20, 2023, by and between the City of Rancho Mirage ("City"), a municipal corporation located in Riverside County, California, and Desert Estate Builders, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Developer").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, City and Developer previously entered into that certain Subdivision Improvement Agreement dated April 19, 2021 ("Agreement") for Developer's construction of public improvements ("Improvements") upon the real property located in the City of Rancho Mirage, California, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ; and
WHEREAS, Schedule "A" of the Agreement provided that Developer must complete construction of the Improvements by no later than May 1, 2023 ("Completion Date"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16 .20 .110 of the City Code, Developer is requesting that the City grant an extension of the Completion Date to May 1, 2024, as set forth in the documentation attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit "B"; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 66462(c) of the California Government Code and Section 16 .20.090 of the City Code, Developer executed various security instruments ("Security Instruments") in connection with the Agreement to ensure completion of construction of the Improvements and to ensure payment to laborers and suppliers of materials; and
WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that City would not approve this Amendment without assurances that the Security Instruments are still in effect and will remain in effect until the later of City accepting the Improvements or in accordance with all applicable periods set forth in any such instruments, City Code and/or applicable law; and WHEREAS, this Amendment was approved by the City Council during its meeting of April 20, 2023.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
2-74
1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated into this Amendment by this reference as though fully set forth herein.
2. Schedule "A" Item 1 of Schedule "A" of the Agreement is hereby amended to reflect a Completion Date of May 1, 2024 .
3 . Further Actions. Developer agrees to take all reasonable actions required in furtherance of this Amendment, including without limitation executing any documents to ensure Security Instruments remain effective as required herein .
4. Attorney 's Fees. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this Amendment or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Amendment, the prevailing party in such suit or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof.
5. Counterparts . This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least a copy hereof shall have been signed by the parties hereto. Electronic signatures shall be deemed to constitute the Agreement having been executed.
6. Conflicts . In the event there exists any conflicts between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall be superseding .
7. Remaining Provisions . All other remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged .
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
2-75
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have executed this Amendment on the date set forth herein above.
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
By: __________ _
Richard W. Kite, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Ryan Stendell, Director of Public
· Works
ATTEST:
Kristi~ Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Colin Kirkpatrick, Assistant City Attorney
DESERT ESTATE BUILDERS, LLC
By: _________ _
3-1
CITY Of-~ MIRl'IG~
~ 21
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: April 20, 2023
FROM: Gloria Griego, Sr. Management Analyst
SUBJECT: Consideration of FY 22-23 Special Assistance Fund (SAF) Awards SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the attached Exhibit A awarding FY 22-23 Special Assistance Funds (SAF).
INFORMATION:
DISCUSSION:
The attached list, which consists of four (4) Special Assistance Fund (SAF) applicants, was evaluated and it is recommended that the city council award funds to four (4) nonprofits for a total amount of $17,000.00.
ATTACHMENT(S):
1. Exhibit "A" -FY 22-23 SAF Award Recommendation.
AGENDA ITEM#
3-2
EXHIBIT "A"
FY 22-23 SAF AWARD RECOMMENDATIONS
(SEE ATTACHED)
3-3
Organizations
Anoel Lioht Academy
Coachella Valley Disaster
Preparedness Network
Elder Love USA, Inc.
United Cerebral Palsy of the
Inland Empire
4 Organizations = Total
EXHIBIT "A"
FY 22/23
SAF Awards
(04-20-2023)
Program
Music & Memory Program at
Vista Cove.
"No Community Left Behind"
Presentations for
Emergency Preparedness.
In-Home Caregiving
Services.
UCPI E Para-Karate
Program.
Award
Recommendations
$5,000.00
$2,000.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$17,000.00
4-1
'-
CITY OF MIRAGE:
©
We hereby accept as filed checks issued thru 4/14/2023:
City Funds $2,269,310.68
ordered paid as stated below.
Date: April 20, 2023
Mayor
DEMANDS\GEN
IIDMINl'iTRA TION D€\JElOPME:NT 'iE:Rl/lCE:'i FINANCE: ltO U'i !N G PUDLIC LIDRARY Tel. 1.760.324.451 1 Tel . 1.760 .328.2266 Tel. 1.760.770.3207 Tel. 1 760 .770.321 0 Tel. 1.760.34 1.7323 Fax . 1.760 .3 24 .8830 Fax . 1.760.324.9851 Fax. 1.760 .324.0528 Fax . 1.760 .324 1617 Fax. 1760.341.5213 69-825 l+IGl+WAY 111 / RANCl+O MIRI\GE:. CA 92270
PUDLIC WORk'.'i
Tel. 1.760.770 .3224
Fax . 1.760.770 .3261
www.RanclloMirageCA.gov www.RelaxRancl1oMirage .co m
4-
2 City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
5592 04/07/2023 EFT 1523 CDW GOVERNMENT INC ZR00335495 03/28/2023 04072023 1,325.24 Invoice : ZR00335495 ACRONIS DISASTER BACKUP PE 3/31/23 1,325.24 10134000 9527 INFMTION SRV SOFTWRE RPLC
CHECK 5592 TOTAL: 1,325.24
5593 04/07/2023 EFT 732 DEBORAH DEJAH 2024 RMWF 04/2023 04/01/2023 20230268 04072023 4,166.67 Invoice: 2024 RMWF 04/2023 2024 RMWF PROGRAM DIRECTOR SERVICE PE 4/2023 4,166.67 244 7400 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
5594 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice : DT-1075
5595 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice : 32557414
5596 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: IN333891
5597 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: 12870
5598 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: 344727-PPU
Invoice: .326549 -PPU
Report generated: 04/06/2023 11: 34
user: elijaha
Program ID: apcshdsb
2783 DESERT THEATRICALS, LLC DT-1075
25,000.00 101 1230
96 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR 32557414
1,415.53 10141000 7400
2875 GEOTAB USA INC IN333891
59.25 10141000 7550
36 JOSLYN CENTER 12870
20,376.08 10157000 7488
2083 KANOPY INC. . 344727-PPU
1,361.00 24281000 7912
KANOPY INC. 326549 -PPU
1,429.00 24281000 7912
CHECK 5593 TOTAL:
03/30/2023 20230295 04072023
ROYALTY DEPOSIT -2024 BROADWAY SHOWS
PREPAID ITEMS
CHECK 5594 TOTAL:
03/31/2023 04072023
SHERIFF VEHICLE RENTAL PE 03/31/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 5595 TOTAL:
03/31/2023 04072023
4,166.67
25,000.00
25,000.00
1,415.53
1,415.53
59.25 VEH TELEMETRICS/GPS -CITIZENS ON PATROL 3/23
CITY -WIDE COPS PROGRAM
CHECK 5596 TOTAL: 59.25
04/04/2023 04072023 20,376 .08
CONTRACT SERVICES Q4 FY 22/23
SENIOR CENTERS
CHECK 5597 TOTAL: 20,376.08
03/31/2023 04072023 1,361.00
STREAMING SERVICE 3/2023
FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
11/30/2022 04072023 1,429.00
STREAMING SERVICE 11/2022
FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
4-
3 City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 100 5 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
5599 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: 55676
1242 LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC 55676
2,540.10 10134000 9475
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 5598 TOTAL :
03/20/2023 20230004 04072023
CP 20-364 : WOLF PARK EXPANSION PE 2/28/23
WOLFSON PARK EXPANSION
CHECK 5599 TOTAL:
NET
2,790.00
2,540.10
2,540.10
·5600 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice~ 2051.039-01
103 MSA CONSULTING, INC. 2051.039 -01 02/28/2023 20230266 04072023 6,885.00 CP 22 -379 : DESIGN SVCS VI STA DEL SOL PE 2/25/23
6,885.00 10134000 9445 VISTA DEL SOL STREET IMPRVMNTS
CHECK 5600 TOTAL : 6,885.00
5601 04/07/2023 EFT 2095 FREDERICK ARTHUR ARMSTRONG, JR 0206CRMTO -FA 02/20/2023 20230288 04072023 5,020.14 Invoice: 0206CRMTO -FA PROMOS -CITY BRANDED COOLER TOTES 5602 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: 23 -175
Invoice: 23 -179
5603 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: 23401005
5604 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice : L843713
Invoice: L843714
Invoice: L843697
Report generated: 04/06/2023 ·U: 34
User: elijaha
Program ID: apcshdsb
5,020.14 107 7478 MARKETING PROGRAM
2370 ROBERT STIFF
·ROBERT STIFF
23 -175
2,500.00 10172000 7494
23-179
1,200.00 10172000 7494
2743 PUBLIC RISK, INNOVATION, SOLUTION 23401005
938.49 10151000 7275
612 RACHEL HORWITZ DESIGN GROUP LLC L843713
2,668.73 24281000 7400
RACHEL HORWITZ DESIGN GROUP LLC L843714
1,040.00 244 7400
RACHEL HORWITZ DESIGN GROUP LLC L843697
CHECK 5601 TOTAL : 5,020.14
03jl9/2023 20230200 04072023 2,500.00
MOON BALLOONS -BEAUTY AND BEAST EVENT 3/17 -19/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
03/26/2023 20230200 04072023
MOON BALLOONS -CV SYMPHONY EVENT 3/26/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
CHECK 5602 TOTAL:
04/03/2023 04072023
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PGM APR-JUN 2023
OTHER MEDICAL
CHECK 5603 TOTAL:
04/03/2023 20230064 04072023
GRAPHIC DESIGN SERVICES 3/2023
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/03/2023 20230042 04072023
RMWF GRAPHIC DESIGN SERVICES 3/2023
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
1,200.00
3,700.00
938.49
938.49
2,668.73
1,040.00
04/03/2023 20230141 04072023 1,034 .37
GRAPHIC DESIGN SVCS -THEATER/RMEA/ASSTD PE 3/29/23
4-
4 City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
5605 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: TCRM-2120
5606 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice : 320230596
Invoice: 22-2303515
5607 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: 010 -54199
Invoice: 010-54196
5608 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: 230302547
5609 04/07/2023 EFT
Invoice: 22823
Report generated: 04/06/2023 11: 34
User : elijaha
Program ID : apcshdsb
1,034.37 107 7478
440 TALENT EVOLUTION LLC TCRM-2120
8,733 .33 10156000 7400
7,900.00 107 7478
254 UNDERGROUND SERVICES ALERT 320230596
144.75 10131000 7400
UNDERGROUND SERVICES ALERT 22-2303515
52.37 10131000 7400
294 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 010-54199
2,220.64 21500000 7400
WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES
420.77 714
865.18 715
421.42 716
2109 WITTMAN ENTERPRISE S LLC
010-54196
7400
7400
7400
230302547
7,182.00 21500000 7400
1848 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS, INC 22823
9,507.64 10151000 7212
25,149 .85 10151000 7212
2,138.90 24281000 7212
1,610.44 24281000 7212
663.59 28000000 7212
6,927.43 28000000 7212
INV DATE PO
INVOICE DTL DESC
MARKETING PROGRAM
CHECK
CHECK RUN NET
5604 TOTAL: 4,743.10
04/01/2023 20230285 04072023 16,633 .33
WEBSITE HOSTING, MAINTENANCE, SECURITY 4/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
MARKETING PROGRAM
CHECK 5605 TOTAL :
04/01/2023 04072023
DIG ALERT TICKETS
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/01/2023 04072023
CA STATE FEE REGULATORY COSTS
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 5606 TOTAL :
03/31/2023 20230030 04072023
CITYWIDE FIRE TAX APR-JUN 2023
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
16,633.33
144.75
52.37 197 .12
2,220.64
03/31/2023 20230030 04072023 1,707.37
ANNL DIST ADMIN AD22 -85/AD25 -90/AD29~96 APR-JUN
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
PROFESS IONAL/TECHNICAL
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 5607 TOTAL:
04/03/2023 04072023
AMBULANCE BILLING SERVICES 3/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 5608 TOTAL:
02/28/2023 04072023
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 2/23 & 12/22
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
3,928.01
7,182.00
7,182 .00
45,997.85
4-
5 City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 5609 TOTAL : 45,997.85
5610 04/07/2023 EFT 1720 ZEN AQUATICS DESIGN LTD 562321 04/01/2023 20230076 04072023 300.00 Invoice: 562321 AQUARIUM MAINTENANCE 3/2023
300.00 24281000 7612 MAINTENANCE
CHECK 5610 TOTAL : 300.00
231230 04/07/2023 PRTD 1691 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 0003279280 03/21/2023 04072023 -81. 28 Invo i ce: 0003279280 CREDIT-SSP PROCESSING PE 2/2023
-81.28 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT H64595880 03/24/2023 04072023 47 .77 Invoice : H64595880 DVDS
47.77 E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037408510 03/22/2023 04072023 134.30 Invoice : 2037408510 BOOKS
134.30 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037408511 03/22/2023 04072023 19.41 Invoice: 2037408511 BOOKS
19 .41 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037408512 03/22/2023 04072023 50.43 Invoice : 2037408512 BOOKS
50.43 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037408514 03/22/2023 04072023 40. 59 Invoice : 2037408514 BOOKS
40.59 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037408515 03/22 /2023 04072023 66 .61 Invoice: 2037408515 BOOKS
66.61 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037408516 03/22/2023 04072023 17.77 Invoice: 2037408516 BOOKS
17.77 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037408517 03/22/2023 04072023 65.32 Invoice: 2037408517 BOOKS
65.32 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037408518 03/22/2023 04072023 22.66 Invoice: 2037408518 BOOKS
22.66 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
Repo rt ge ne rat e d: 04 /06/20 23 11: 34
us e r : e lijaha
Pr og ram ID : ap cs hdsb
4-
6 City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE . TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037408519 03/22/2023 04072023 17 .67 Invoice: 2037408519 BOOKS
17.67 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT H64453600 03/07/2023 04072023 31.88 Invoice: H64453600 DVDS
31.88 E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT H64466310 03/08/2023 04072023 22 .30 Invoice: H64466310 DVDS
22 .30
E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT H64478360 03/09/2023 04072023 130 .71 Invoice: H64478360 DVDS
130.71
E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT H64478370 03/09/2023 04072023 31.89 Invoice: H64478370 DVDS
31.89 E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037374579 03 /08/2023 04072023 41. 51 Invoice: 2037374579 BOOKS
41.51 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037374580 03 /08 /2023 04072023 7 .48 Invoice : 2037374580 BOOKS
7 .48 2 4 281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037374581 03/08/2023 04072023 70. 56 Invoice: 2037374581 BOOKS
70.56 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037374582 03/08/2023 04072023 92.11 Invoice: 2037374582 BOOKS
92.11 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037374583 03/08/2023 04072023 47.82 Invoice: 2037374583 BOOKS
47.82 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037374584 03/08/2023 04072023 21.09 Invoice : 2037374584 BOOKS
21.09 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
Repo rt gen e ra t ed : 04/06/2023 11 : 34
User: e lij ah a
Progr a m ID: a pcs hdsb
Page
4-
7 City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037374585 03/08/2023 04072023 12.22 Invoice: 2037374585 BOOKS
12.22 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037374586 03/08/2023 04072023 12.91 Invoice: 2037374586 BOOKS
12.91 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385275 03/14/2023 04072023 8.98 Invoice : 2037385275 BOOKS
8.98 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385276 03/14/2023 04072023 23.13 Invoice: 2037385276 BOOKS
23.13 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385277 03/14/2023 04072023 19.70 Invoice: 2037385277 BOOKS
19.70 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385278 03/14/2023 04072023 38.85 Invoice: 2037385278 BOOKS
38.85 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385279 03/14/2023 04072023 49 . 77 Invoice; 2037385279 BOOKS
49.77 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385280 03/14/2023 04072023 18.11 Invoice: 2037385280 BOOKS
18.11 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385281 03/14/2023 04072023 24. 50 Invoice: 2037385281 BOOKS
24.50 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385282 03/14/2023 04072023 792.83 Invoice: 2037385282 BOOKS
792.83 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385283 03/14/2023 04072023 379.88 Invoice: 2037385283 BOOKS
379.88 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 2037385284 03/14/2023 04072023 19 .80 Invoice: 2037385284 BOOKS
19.80 24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT H64547670 03/16/2023 04072023 74.12 Invoice: H64547670 DVDS
74.12 Rep.art generated : 04 /06/2023 11: 34
User: elijaha
Program ID: a pc shdsb
4-
8 City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 231231 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 55958
231232 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 55955
INVOICE DTL DESC
E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
801 BARREL STRENGTH PRODUCTIONS 55958
2,000.00 244 7910
331 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS 55955
1,450 .00 101 2464
-145.00 101 4222
CHECK 231230 TOTAL:
03/30/2023 04072023
2024 RMWF CONSULTANT SERVICES
FOUNDATION -PROGRAMS
CHECK 231231 TOTAL:
04/01/2023 04072023
STATE FEE QE 03/23
CBSC FUND FEE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FEES
CHECK 231232 TOTAL:
2,373.40
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,305 .00
1,305.00
231233 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 104327
1657 CARDIFF TRANSPOR1ATION 10432-7 02/28/2023 04072023 1,482.35 1,482.35 10157000 7874
TRANSPORT SVCS -SPEAKER SER CI BROWN 2/21-22/23
SPEAKERS SERIES
CHECK 231233 TOTAL: 1,482 .35
231234 04/07/2023 PRTD 2860 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 0324436032623 03/26/2023 04072023 1,206.48 Invoice: 0324436032623 SERVICE PE 4/25/23 (ACCT #8448-41-077-0324436) Invoice: 0001812032123
Invoice: 0002414032423
231235 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 9218182076
Report generated: 04/06/2023 11: 34
User: elijaha
Program ID : apc shdsb
1,206.48 24281000 7826 INTERNET ACCESS & SERVICE
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 0001812032123 03/21/2023 04072023 3,447.37 SVC PE 4/19/23 (ACCT #8448-20-899-0001812)
3,447.37 10151000 7826 INTERNET ACCESS & SERVICE
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 0002414032423 03/24/2023 04072023 1,265.95 SERVICE 4/18/23 (ACCT #8448-20-899-0002414)
59.47 24281000 7602 CABLE .
1,206.48 24281000 7826 INTERNET ACCESS & SERVICE
275 CINTAS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT 9218182076
426.69 24281000 7400
CHECK 231234 TOTAL:
04/01/2023 20230195 04072023
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR AEDS
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
5,919.80
426.69
CHECK 231235 TOTAL: 426.69
4-
9 City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 · CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
231236 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 55933
11 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION 55933
231237 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 55950
30,408.00 702 2460
311 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION COM 55950
1,515.00 702 2473
-15 .15 101 4222
INV DATE PO
INVOICE DTL DESC
04/01/2023
TUMF FEES 03/23
TUMF DEPOSITS
CHECK
CHECK RUN
04072023
231236 TOTAL:
04/01/2023 04072023
MSHCP FEES 03/23
MSHCP FEES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FEES
CHECK 231237 TOTAL:
231238 04/07/2023 PRTD ·13 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 848582031723 03/30/2023 04072023 Invoice: 848582031723 SERVICE PE 3/17/2023 (ACCT #316055-848582)
72.68 24281000 .7606 WATER
231239 04/07/2023 PRTD 1591 DLT SOLUTIONS LLC SI603385
Invoice: SI603385 2,465.10 10156000 7639
231240 04/07/2023 PRTD 1611 DELORES MARIE SCHIMKE 55812 Invoice: 55812
495.00 10133300 8012
CHECK 231238 TOTAL:
03/30/2023 04072023
AUTOCAD SUBSCRIPTION PE 4/8/24
COMPUTER MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231239 TOTAL:
02/28/2023 04072023
PURCHASE/INSTALL BLINDS -CITY HALL OFFICE
SMALL TOOLS, FURN & EQUIP
CHECK 231240 TOTAL:
231241 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 910034443
403 EMCOR SERVICE 910034443 03/29/2023 20230125 04072023 SVC TELESCOPE AC UNIT -OBSERVATORY 3/17/23
280.00 24282000 7613 OBSERVATORY MAINTENANCE
231242 04/07/2023 PRTD 2993 EZDA SOLUTIONS LLC CINV-014 Invoice: CINV-014 1,999.14 10156000 7806
CHECK 231241 TOTAL:
04/03/2023 04072023
IT TRAINING ACCESS
MEETINGS/TRAINING/TRAVEL
CHECK 231242 TOTAL:
NET
30,408.00
30,408.00
1,499.85
1,499.85
72.68 72.68
2,465.10
2,465.10
495.00
495.00
280.00
280.00
1,999 .14
1,999.14
Report generated: 0 4/06/2023 11: 34
user: elijaha
Program ID: apcshdsb
4-
1 0
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME .INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
231243 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 8-085-91823
24 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 8-085-91823 03/31/2023 04072023 231244 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 2403430
26.7110155000 8000
1421 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC #1350 2403430
17.71 24281000 8004
EXPRESS MAIL -DUI REIMBURSEMENT PACKET
SUPPLIES
CHECK 231243 TOTAL:
03/24/2023 04072023
PLUMBING SUPPLIES -RPR TOILET LIBRARY
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHECK 231244 TOTAL:
231245 04/07/2023 PRTD 1528 FIND FOOD BANK
Invoice: 370986
370986
50.45 28100000 7497
50.45 28300000 7497
50.44 28400000 7497
50.44 28600000 7497
02/28/2023 04072023
FOOD FROM FOOD BANK 2/8/2023
SPECIAL CONTRIBUTIONS
SPECIAL CONTRIBUTIONS
SPECIAL CONTRIBUTIONS
SPECIAL CONTRIBUTIONS
231246 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 9034600323
1727 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE 9034600323
48 .00 10131000 7400
CHECK 231245 TOTAL:
03/31/2023 04072023
RECORDING DOCS PE 3/31/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 231246 TOTAL:
231247 04/07/2023 PRTD 2994 FLOCK GROUP INC INV -12980 04/03/2023 20230294 04072023 Invoice: INV-12980 LPR CAMERAS -SHERIFF
231248 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: CI-000023
231249 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 55132
Report generated: 04/06/2023 11: 34
User : elijaha
Program ID: apcshdsb
160,000.00 10141000 7400 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 231247 TOTAL:
100 GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION CI-000023 04/01/2023 04072023 Q4 FUNDING FY 22/23
87,138.79 107 7472 DESERT RESORT CVA
CHECK 231248 TOTAL:
671 JOHN SCOTT BEATY 55132 02/23/2023 04072023
HONORARIUM-SCOTT BEATY, PIANIST 3/29/2023
1,200.00
E LB_BARTUSH-UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7919 FOUNDATN-LITERARY LEGACY
NET
26.71 26.71
17.71 17.71
201. 78
201. 78
48.00 48.00
160,000.00
160,000.00
87,138.79
87,138.79
1,200.00
4-
1 1
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME
231250 04/07/2023 PRTD 2992 NABIL AYERS
Invoice: 55957
INVOICE
55957
500.00 244 7887
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 231249 TOTAL: 1,200.00
03/29/2023 04072023 500.00
HONORARIUM-MY LIFE IN THE SUNSHINE 3/28/2023
SPECIAL EVENTS
CHECK 231250 TOTAL: 500.00
231251 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 1616
2037 OBSERVATORY SYSTEMS LLC 1616 03/15/2023 20230095 04072023 8,400.00 8,400.00 24282000 7613
REMOTE OBSERVATORY SUPPORT SERVICES FY 22/23
OBSERVATORY MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231251 TOTAL: 8,400.00
231252 04/07/2023 PRTD 99999 STEVE WITZENBERGER 55931 04/03/2023
ANIMAL ADOPTION PROGRAM
ANIMAL SERVICES
04072023 100.00
Invoice: 55931
100.00 10157000 7420
CHECK 231252 TOTAL: 100.00
231253 04/07/2023 PRTD 295 OVERDRIVE INC 01187DA23099122 03/28/2023 04072023 110.00 Invoice: 01187DA23099122 EBOOKS
110.00
E LB_ELECT -UNDEFI NED -U NDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
CHECK 231253 TOTAL: 110.00
231254 04/07/2023 PRTD 2997 BENJAMIN RHODES 1 02/06/2023 04072023 10,178.16 Invoice: 1
231255 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 154522
5 POWERS AWARDS
10,178.16 244 7910
154522
38.79 24281000 8000
2023 RMWF HONONRARIUM & TRAVEL EXPENSES -B RHODES
FOUNDATION -PROGRAMS
CHECK
04/03/2023
NAME BADGES
SUPPLIES
CHECK
231254 TOTAL: 10,178.16
04072023 38.79
231255 TOTAL : 38.79
231256 04/07/2023 PRTD 147 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT SH0000042609 02/15/2023 04072023 712,502.68 Invoice: SH0000042609 LAW ENFORCEMENT BP#6 11/17/2022 -12/14/2022 712,502.68 10141000 7404 SHERIFF SERVICES
Report generated : 04/06/2023 11: 34
User: elijaha
Program ID: apcshdsb
4-
1 2
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 231256 TOTAL:
231257 04/07/2023 PRTD 64 STATE CONTROLLERS OFFICE FAUD-00003704 03/22/2023 04072023 Invoice: FAUD-00003704
231258 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 55956
231259 04/07/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 161531540
Repor t gene r ated : 04/06/2023 11 : 34
user: e lij a ha
Program ID : apc s hdsb
. ANNUAL STREET REPORT FY 22 -23
3,042. 72 224 7400 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 231257 TOTAL:
16 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 55956 04/01/2023 04072023
509 ULINE, INC
SMI FEES Q3 01/23 -03/23
1,633.13 101 2465 SMI FEE
CHECK 231258 TOTAL:
161531540 03/23/2023 04072023
BAGS
271.00 24281000 8000 SUPPLIES
NUMBER OF CHECKS 49
TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS
TOTAL EFT'S
***
COUNT
I! 19
CHECK 231259 TOTAL:
CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL
AMOUNT
W•lmlln'Bt:i 153,197.91
***
*** GRAND TOTAL ***
NET
712,502.68
3,042.72
3 ,042.72
1,633.13
1,633.13
271.00
271.00
1,189,334.39
1,189,334.39
4-
1 3
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
5611 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 84757
1650 AQUA-SERV ENGINEERS, INC 84757
5612 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 52525
5613 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 537362
Invoice: 538069
Invoice: 538071-1
5614 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 27308-INV
Report generated: 04/13/2023 11: 50
user: anac
Program ID : apcshdsb
2463 ASSUREHIRE, INC
333 BECK OIL INC
BECK OIL INC
BECK OIL INC
274.00 10133300 7612
274.00 24281000 7612
52525
79.90 10154000 7860
537362
292.75 10132000 7623
131 .05 10133000 7623
109.28 21800000 7623
25.81 10151000 7623
72.99 10131000 7623
185.09 10132000 7623
100.00 10141000 7623
66.53 10122000 7623
49.20 10123000 7623
31.85 21500000 7623
538069
440.50 10132000 7623
331.39 10133000 7623
149.02 10131000 7623
405 .6 4 10132000 7623
185.90 10141000 7623
74.26 10122000 7623
114.67 10123000 7623
538071-1
514.74 10132000 7623
497.69 10132000 7634
2641 TIGHTROPE MEDIA SYSTEMS, INC. 27308-INV
2,100.00 10156000 7639
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
03/31/2023 20230012 04142023
COOL TOWER MAINT -CITY HALL/LIB PE 3/31/23
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
CHECK 5611 TOTAL:
04/01/2023 04142023
RECRUITMENT BACKGROUND CHECK PE 3/7/23
RECRUITMENT
CHECK
03/28/2023
FUEL PE 3/28/23
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
5612 TOTAL:
04142023
04/04/2023 04142023
FUEL PE 4/4/23
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
VEHICLE FUEL
04/04/2023 04142023
FUEL PE 4/4/23
VEHICLE FUEL
EQUIPMENT MAINT & FUEL
CHECK
04/07/2023
RMTV SOFTWAR MAINT
COMPUTER MAINTENANCE
5613 TOTAL:
04142023
NET
548.00
548.00
79.90 79.90
1,064.55
1,701.38
1,012.43
3,778.36
2,100.00
4-
1 4
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT : 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYP E VENDOR NAME INVOICE
5615 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 30658319
5616 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice : 9769
274 CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS I 30658319
320.89 10156000 7818
876 GOTHAM ARTISTS TALENT SERVICES IN 9769
2,458.56 10157000 7874
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 5614 TOTAL: 2,100.00
03/31/2023 04142023 320.89
REAL QUEST PROPERTY SVCS/DOC IMAGE PE 3/31/23
DUES & SUBSCRIPTION S
CHECK 5615 TOTAL : 320 .89
03/08/2023 · 04142023 2,458.56
EXP REIMB -SPEAKER SERIES EMMITT SMITH 2/21/23
SPEAKERS SERIES
CHECK 5616 TOTAL:
5617 04/14/2023 EFT 1716 GRAINGER 9656891786 03/29/2023 04142023 2,458 .56
144 .28
Invoice : 9656891786 HDMI CABLE -CITY YARD
144.28 10133310 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHECK 5617 TOTAL : 144.28
5618 04/14/2023 EFT 1358 HERC RENTALS INC 33576133-001 03 /30/2023 04142023 945.52 Invoice : 33576133 -001
5619 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 750249
Invoice: 751533
5620 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 04012023
Invoice: 04012023SJ
Invoice: 04012023SR
Repor t gene r a t e d : 0 4/13 /2 0 2 3° 11: 50
Use r: a na c
Pro gram ID: apc shdsb
BOOM RENTAL -FS #50 3/16-17/23
945.52 21500500 8002 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
28 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 750249
606 .37 201 8000
HIG H TECH IRRIGATION INC 751533
25.90 21893000 8004
519 HYDER AND COMPANY 04012023
11,807.24 28100000 7400
HYDER AND COMPANY 04012023SJ
11,846.13 28600000 7400
HYDER AND COMPANY 04012023SR
CHECK 5618 TOTAL: 945.52
03/23/2023 04142023 606.37
RAIN BIRD VALVES/TAPE/ADAPTERS
SUPPLIE S
04/05/2023 04142023 25.90
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES -WOLF PARK
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHECK 5619 TOTAL: 632.27
04/01/2023 20230077 04142023 11,807.24
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS -PARKVIEW VILLAS 4/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/01/2023 20230078 04142023 11 ,846.13
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS -SAN JACINTO VILLAS 4/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/01/2023 20230079 04142023 6,460 .15
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS -SANTA ROSA VILLAS 4/23
4-
1 5
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
6,460.15 28400000 7400 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
HYDER AND COMPANY 04012023WW 04/01/2023 20230080 04142023 4,610.23 Invoice: 04012023ww
5621 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 56195
5622 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 72
Invoice: 71
5623 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 56227
5624 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 55987
5625 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 167053
Invoice: 167201
Report generated : 04/13 /2023 11: 50
user : anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS -WHISPERING WATERS 4/23
4,610.23 28300000 7400 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
34 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 56195
22,587.09 101 2235
2785 JENNIFER S. YOUNT 72
1,230.00 10172000 7494
JENNIFER S. YOUNT 71
562 BRIAN KEPHART
1,582.50 10172000 7494
56227
180.00 10142000 7806
277.85 10142000 7806
1242 LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC 55987
5,957.50 10134000 9600
728 DBA MAXIMUM SECURITY ALARM SYSTEM 167053
174.00 10133310 7612
148.00 10133300 7612
114.00 21892000 7612
62.00 21500690 7612
DBA MAXIMUM SECURITY ALARM SYSTEM 167201
127.50 10133310 7612
CHECK
04/12/2023
ICMA 457 PE 04/07/23
DEFERRED COMP -ICMA
CHECK
5620 TOTAL:
04142023
5621 TOTAL:
34,723.75
22,587.09
22,587.09
09/21/2022 20230302 04142023 1,230.00
PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS -BEAUTY & BEAST/SPEAKER SERIES
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
09/21/2022 20230302 04142023 1,582.50
PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS -LUNAR FEST/S PACIFIC/EMMIT SMITH
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
CHECK 5622 TOTAL:
04/12/2023 04142023
EXP REIMB -EPC TRAINING 4/4-6/23
MEETINGS/TRAINING/TRAVEL
MEETINGS/TRAINING/TRAVEL
CHECK 5623 TOTAL:
2,812.50
457.85
457.85
04/03/2023 20230253 04142023 5,957.50
CP 20-365: UTILITY UNDERGROUND PROJ PE 2/28/23
WATER/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
CHECK 5624 TOTAL: 5,957.50
04/01/2023 04142023
MONITORING SERVICES PE 5/31/23
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
03/29/2023
INSTALL MOTION DETECTOR
MAINTENANCE
04142023
498.00
127.50
4-
1 6
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
5626 04/14/2023 EFT 1317 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 519043118 Invoice: 519043118
Invoice: 519062295
Invoice: 519062300
Invoice: 519062301
Invoice: 519069251
5627 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 56200
5628 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 23 -201
5629 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice : L843698
5630 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 56085
Report generated : 04/13/2023 11: 50
User: anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
41.06 10132000 8002
MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 519062295
35.00 21500690 8002
MI SS ION LINEN SUPPLY 519062300
66.86 10133300 8002
MI SS ION LINEN SUPPLY 519062301
41.00 21500500 8002
MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 519069251
25.50 24281000 8002
468 NATIONWIDE 56200
1,385.23 101 2241
2370 ROBERT STIFF 23 -201
2,500.00 10172000 7494
612 RACHEL HORWITZ DESIGN GROUP LLC L843698
32.50 10142000 7486
966 KRI STIE L. RAMOS 56085
575.00 10112000 7806
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 5625 TOTAL:
04/04/2023 20230011 04142023
MAT/TWL RENTAL -CITY YARD 4/4/23
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
04/06/2023 20230011 04142023
MAT RENTAL -FS #69 4/6/23
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
04/06/2023 20230011 04142023
MAT RENTAL -CITY HALL 4/6/23
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
04/06/2023 20230011 04142023
MAT RENTAL -
F
S #50 4/6/23
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
04/07/2023 20230011 04142023
BI-WEEKLY FLOOR MAT & TOWEL RENTAL S~RVICE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
CHECK 5626 TOTAL:
04/12/2023 04142023
PT DEFERRED COMP PE 04/07/23
NATIONAL -PART TIME
CHECK 5627 TOTAL:
NET
625.50
41.06 35 .00
66.86 41.00
25.50 209.42
1,385.23
1,385.23
04/10/2023 20230200 04142023 2,500.00
MOON BALLOONS -JOSEPH AMPHITHEATR EVENT 4/14 -16/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
CHECK 5628 TOTAL:
04/03/2023 20230141 04142023
GRAPHIC DESIGN SVCS -EPC BROCHURES
COMMUNITY FORUMS
CHECK 5629 TOTAL:
04/04/2023 04142023
EXP REIMB -CCAC CONF 4/11-14/23
MEETINGS/TRAINING/TRAVEL
2,500.00
32. 50
32 .50
575 .00
4-
1 7
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
5631 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 103564
5632 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 23 -90 -CY
5633 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 23 -90-CH
50 RANCHO MIRAGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 103564
15,000.00 10174000 7468
632 RANCHO MIRAGE POWER PARTNERS I, L 23-90 -CY
1,113.22 10133310 7603
712 RMPP II, LLC 23 -90 -CH
2,669 .33 10133300 7603
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 5630 TOTAL: 575.00
03/24/2023 20230041 04142023 15,000.00
TECHNOLOGY FEE -ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QTR4 FY22/23
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CHECK 5631 TOTAL:
04/04/2023 04142023
SOLAR SERVICE -CITY YARD 3/23
ELECTRICITY
CHECK 5632 TOTAL:
04/04/2023 04142023
SOLAR SERVICE -CITY HALL 3/23
ELECTRICITY
CHECK 5633 TOTAL:
15,000.00
1,113.22
1,113.22
2,669.33
2,669.33
5634 04/14/2023 EFT 289 SATCOM GLOBAL FZE AS04230144 04/01/2023 04142023 85.50 Invoice: AS04230144
5635 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 105629cs
5636 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice : 55592
Invoice: 5 5 593
Invoice : 55594
Invoice: 56206
Report generated: 04/13/2023 11: 50
user: anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
SATELLITE PHONE SVC PE 3/31/23.
85.50 10142000 7824 COMMUNICATION MAIN/SERV
2972 SCA OF CA, LLC 105629CS
7,862.96 248 7615
640 STEVEN B QUINTANILLA, 55592
2,849.00 10114000 7400
STEVEN B QUINTANILLA, 55593
5,596.50 10114000 7400
STEVEN B QUINTANILLA, 55594
. 7 ,563.00 10114000 7400
STEVEN B QUINTANILLA, 56206
CHECK 5634 TOTAL :
03/31/2023 20230250 04142023
CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING 3/31/23
STREET SWEEPING
CHECK 5635 TOTAL:
04/11/2023 04142023
LEGAL SERVICES 3/31/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/11/2023 04142023
LEGAL SERVICES 3/31/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/11/2023 04142023
LEGAL SERVICES 3/31/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/11/2023 04142023
LEGAL SERVICES PE 1/30/23
85.50 7,862.96
7,862.96
2,849.00
5,596.50
7,563 .00
60,599.40
4-
1 8
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
60,599.40 10114000 7400
INV DATE PO
INVOICE DTL DESC
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
CHECK RUN NET
5636 TOTAL: 76,607.90
5637 04/14/2023 EFT 2849 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 135813117 -0002 03/24/2023 20230276 04142023 3,038.41 Invoice: 135813117-0002 CP 20 -365: MESSAGE BOARDS -CC/HWY 111 3/8 -4/4/23 3,038.41 10134000 9600 WATER/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
SUNBELT RENTALS INC 135813574 -002 03/24/2023 20230276 04142023 3,038.41 Invoice: 135813574-002 CP 20 -365: MESSAGE BOARDS -BH/HWY 111 3/8 -4/4/23 3,038.41 10134000 9600 WATER/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
CHECK 5637 TOTAL: 6,076.82
5638 04/14/2023 EFT 1398 TK ELEVATOR 3007196503 04/01/2023 04142023 1,178.23 Invoice: 3007196503 ELEVATOR FIRE MAINT -CITY HALL 4/1 -6/30/23 1,178.23 10133300 7612 MAINTENANCE
CHECK 5638 TOTAL: 1,178.23
5639 04/14/2023 EFT 2244 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 759854 020723 03/29/2023 04142023 58.06 Invoice: 759854 020723 SERVICE PE 02/07/23
58.06 10133310 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 467214 021023 03/29/2023 04142023 70 .85 Invoice: 467214 021023 SERVICE PE 02/10/23
70.85 10133310 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 467024 021023 03/29/2023 04142023 71. 59 Invoice: 467024 021023 SERVICE PE 02/10/23
71.59 10133310 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 759442 021023 03/29/2023 04142023 36.34 Invoice: 759442 021023 SERVICE PE 02/10/23
36.34 201 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 845202 021023 03/29/2023 04142023 30.49 Invoice: 845202 021023 SERVICE PE 02/10/23
30.49 10133310 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 843102 021023 03/29/2023 04142023 25 .88 Invoice: 843102 021023 SERVICE PE 02/10/23
25.88 10133310 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 861254 021323 03/29/2023 04142023 88 .40 Invoice : 861254 021323 SERVICE PE 02/13/23
88 .40 21891000 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 861264 021323 03/29/2023 04142023 103 .26 Report generated: 04/13/2023 11: 50
user: anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
4-
1 9
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT : 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 861264 021323 SERVICE PE 02/13/23
103.26 21891000 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 531028 021523 03/29/2023 04142023 40.67 Invoice: 531028 021523 SERVICE PE 02/15/23
40 .67 207 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 847570 021523 03/29/2023 04142023 26.10 Invoice: 847570 021523 SERVICE PE 02/15/23
26.10 201 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 582266 021523 03/29/2023 04142023 62.49 Invoice: 582266 021523 SERVICE PE 02/15/23
62.49 21893000 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 847568 021523 03/29/2023 04142023 31.66 Invoice: 847568 021523 SERVICE PE 02/15/23
31.66 201 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 528640 021523 03/29/2023 04142023 31.66 Invoice: 528640 021523 SERVICE PE 02/15/23
31.66 10133320 7606 WATER
U.S . BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 462388 021523 03/29/2023 04142023 70.24 Invoice : 462388 021523 SERVIC E PE 02/15/23
70.24 10132000 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 888040 021623 03/29/2023 04142023 104.35 Invoice: 888040 021623 SERVICE PE 02/16/23
104.35 201 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 777460 021623 03/29/2023 04142023 1,156.44 Invoice : 777460 021623 SERVICE PE 02/16/23
1,156.44 10133300 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 767714 022323 03/29/2023 04142023 166.88 Invoice: 767714 022323 SERVICE PE 03/23/23
166.88 10132000 7606 WATER
U.S . BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 849270 022823 03/29/2023 04142023 190.25 Invoice: 849270 022823 SERVICE PE 02/28/23
190 .25 201 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 849722 022823 03/29/2023 04142023 338.64 Invoice: 849722 022823 SERVICE PE 02/28/23
338.64 21892000 7606 WATER
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTE 847828 030123 03/29/2023 04142023 1,833.00 Invoice: 847828 030123 SERVICE PE 03/10/23
947.63 201 7606 WATER
581.00 10133320 7606 WATER
262.95 21500500 7606 WATER
Report generated: 04/13/2023 11: 50
user: anac
P~ogram ID: apcshdsb
4-
2 0
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
41. 42 21500500 7606 WATER
CHECK 5639 TOTAL:
5640 04/14/2023 EFT 489 VERIZON WIRELESS 9931449319 04/01/2023 04142023 4,537.25
6,008.84
Invoice: 9931449319 SERVICE PE 4/1/23 (ACCT# 572244822 -00001) 5641 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 228537
Invoice: 228477
Invoice: 228476
5642 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 81620587
Invoice: 81623413
5643 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 010 -54198
Report generated: 04/13/2023 11 : 50
user: anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
6,008.84 10151000 7824 COMMUNICATION MAIN/SERV
2889 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES INC 228537
2,240.00 21892000 7612
VINTAGE ASSOCIATES INC 228477
68.00 201 7612
VINTAGE ASSOCIATES INC 228476
293.00 201 7612
1542 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 81620587
13.23 24281000 8004
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 81623413
64.22 24281000 8004
294 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 010-54198
5,694.36 201 7400
28.09 202 7400
27.88 203 7400
28 .50 204 7400
28.12 205 7400
27.96 207 7400
559.39 21800000 7400
CHECK 5640 TOTAL: 6,008.84
03/30/2023 20230129 04142023 2,240 .00
EXTRA WRK -TRIM PALM TREES -WOLFSON PARK 3/10/23
MAINTENANCE
03/23/2023 20230129 04142023
EXTRA WRK -ACCIDENT CLEANUP DAVALL/GF
MAINTENANCE
03/23/2023 20230129 04142023
RPLC PLNTS -ACCIDENT DAVALL/GF 1/18/23
MAINTENANCE
CHECK 5641 TOTAL:
04/05/2023 04142023
AIR FRESHENER
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
04/06/2023 04142023
SOAP DISPENSER
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHECK 5642 TOTAL:
68.00 1/18/23
293.00
2,601.00
13 .23
64.22 77 .45
03/31/2023 20230030 04142023 6,394.30
ANNL DIST ADMIN LLD 87-01/CITY PARK TAX APR-JUN 23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 5643 TOTAL: 6,394.30
4-
2 1
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
5644 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 56204
5645 04/14/2023 EFT
Invoice: 33123
231260 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 56196
1848 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS, INC 56204
192.31 101 2280
1848 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS, INC 33123
2,725.57 10151000 7212
15,832.39 10151000 7212
1,200.50 21800000 7212
606.60 21800000 7212
4,616.33 24281000 7212
2,653.45 24281000 7212
695 .80 28000000 7212
56 ALTURA CREDIT UNION 56196
176.00 101 2245
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
04/12/2023 04142023
CHILD CARE PE 04/07/23
TAX DEFERRED CHILD CARE
CHECK 5644 TOTAL:
03/31/2023 04142023
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 3/23 & 12/22
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
CHECK 5645 TOTAL:
04/12/2023 04142023
CREDIT UNION PE 04/07/23
EMPLOYEE CREDIT UNION
CHECK 231260 TOTAL:
231261 04/14/2023 PRTD 1297 AUTOZONE, INC
Invoice: 6227981754
6227981754 03/28/2023 04142023
TAIL LIGHTS -IN02
23.24 10132000 7624 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
Invoice: 6227984918
AUTOZONE, INC 6227984918 03/31/2023 04142023
PAINT REMOVER
72.18 10132000 8003 STREET SIGNS & MARKINGS
CHECK 231261 TOTAL:
231262 04/14/2023 PRTD 1691 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT Invoice: H64697260
H64697260
DVDS
04/03/2023 04142023
231263 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 56103
Repo r t generated: 04/13/2023 11: 50
user : anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
55.80 E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFI NED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
CHECK 231262 TOTAL:
1397 BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS 56103 04/06/2023 04142023 SAF AWARD 4/6/23
5,000.00 10157000 7456 SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FUNDS
NET
192.31
192.31
28,330.64
28,330.64
176.00
176.00
23.24 72.18
95.42 55.80
55.80 5,000.00
4-
2 2
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE. TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
231264 04/14/2023 PRTD 1527 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 44103
Invoice: 44103
231265 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: C18846
479.60 10141000 7400
1561 BMW MOTORCYCLES OF RIVERSIDE Cl8846
38,000.67 10141000 7624
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 231263 TOTAL:
03/17/2023 04142023
DUI TESTING PE 2/27/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 231264 TOTAL:
03/25/2023 20230105 04142023
RPLC MOTORCYCLE -SHERIFF
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231265 TOTAL :
NET
5,000.00
479.60
479.60
38,000.67
38,000.67
231266 04/14/2023 PRTD 246 BURRTEC WASTE & RECYCLING SERVICE 44-BS 504328 043023 04/01/2023 04142023 107.30 Invoice: 44-BS 504328 043023 STORAGE BOX RNTL -YARD 4/23 (ACCT #44-BS 504328) 231267 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 20230316-09
107.30 10133310 8002 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
CHECK 231266 TOTAL:
2990 BUSHIDO TACTICAL LLC 20230316-09 03/16/2023 20230299 04142023 4,247.25 10141000 8910
TACTICAL BALISTIC CARRIER VESTS -SHERIFF
OTHER EQUIPMENT
CHECK 231267 TOTAL:
231268 04/14/2023 PRTD 1657 CARDIFF TRANSPORTATION 104276 02/14/2023 20230306 04142023 2023 RMWF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
SPECIAL EVENTS Invoice: 104276
45,061.40 244 7887
CHECK 231268 TOTAL:
231269 04/14/2023 PRTD 2860 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, 129838601040123 04/01/2023 04142023 Invoice: 129838601040123 SERVICE PE 4/30/23 (ACCT# 129838601) 945.09 10151000 7824 COMMUNICATION MAIN/SERV
CHECK 231269 TOTAL :
231270 04/14/2023 PRTD 2860 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 0324444032523 03/25/2023 04142023 107.30
4,247.25
4,247.25
45,061.40
45 ,0 61.40
945.09
945.09
984.48
Invoice: 0324444032523 SERVICE 4/24/23 (ACCT #8448-41-077-0324444) 984.48 21800000 7824 COMMUNICATION MAIN/SERV
Invoice: 0034522040123
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 0034522040123 04/01/2023 04142023 136.39 SERVICE PE 4/30/23 (ACCT #8448-41-077-0034522)
136.39 10151000 7824 COMMUNICATION MAIN/SERV
Report generated: 04/13/2023 11: 50
user: anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
4-
2 3
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT : 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 0037798040123 04/01/2023 04142023 658.65 Invoice: 0037798040123 SVC PE 6/30/23 FS #69 (ACCT #8448 -41-077 -003779) 658.65 21500690 7826 INTERNET ACCESS & SERVICE
231271 04/14/2023 PRTD 275 CINTAS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT 9218168236 Invoice : 9218168236
555.99 10142000 7400
CINTAS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT 9218167468
Invoice: 9218167468
139.00 10142000 7400
CINTAS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT 921816965 5
Invoice: 9218169655
139.00 10142000 7400
CINTAS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT 5152883817
Invoice: 5152883817
180.17 10133300 8000
CINTAS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT 5153044431
Invoice: 5153044431
177.70 21892000 8000
CINTAS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT 5152883898
Invoice: 5152883898
395.54 24281000 8000
231272 04/14/2023 PRTD 1314 COVE ELECTRIC INC SM11130
Invoice: SM11130
Invoice: SM11182
COVE ELECTRIC INC
2,047.00 21500500 7612
SM11182
690.00 10133300 7612
231273 04/14/2023 PRTD 2998 DAVID H PETRAEUS 56048
Invoice: 56048
25,000.00 244 1230
Report generated: 04 /13 /2023 11 : 50
user: anac
Program IO: apcshdsb
CHECK 231270 TOTAL:
04/01/2023 20230032 04142023
AED SERVICE AGRE EMENT -CITY HALL 4/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/01/2023 20230032 04142023
AED SERVICE AGRE EMENT -RMC PARK 4/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/01/2023 20230032 04142023
AED SERVICE AGREEMENT -CITY YARD 4/23
PROFE SSIONAL/TECHNICAL
04/06/2023 04142023
FIRST AID SUPPLIE S -CITY HALL
SUPPLIES
04/07/2023 04142023
FIRST AID SUPPLIE S -RMC PARK
SUPPLIES
04/06/2023
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
CHECK
04142023
231271 TOTAL:
03/28/2023 04142023
RETROFIT LIGHTING -FS #50 3/28/23
MAINTENANCE
1,779.52
555.99
139.00
139.00
180.17
177.70
395 .54
1,587.40
2,047 .00
04/05/2023 04142023 690.00
ELECTRICAL WORK -ELECTRICAL MAIN PANEL CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE
CHECK
04/06/2023
2024 RMWF DEPOSIT
PREPAID ITEMS
231272 TOTAL:
04142023
2,737 .00
25,000.00
4-
2 4
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
231274 04/14/2023 PRTD 1750 DD PAINTING, INC 95725
Invoice: 95725
990.00 21500500 7612
DD PAINTING, INC 95736
Invoice: 95736 1,950.00 10133310 7612
231275 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 647604
132 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 647604
231276 04/14/2023 PRTD 1491 DESERT ARC
Invoice: 52549
231277 04/14/2023 PRTD 1491 DESERT ARC
Invoice: 4220
231278 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 32723
601 JOSUE CAMPA
32.00 10154000 7860
52549
735.00 10133320 7612
4220
145.00 10112000 7400
60.00 24281000 7400
32723
600.00 10172000 7494
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 231273 TOTAL: 25,000.00
03/22/2023 04142023 990.00
RPR DRYWALL/PATCH/PAINT -FS #50 PE 2/7/23
MAINTENANCE
02/21/2023 04142023 1,950.00
PAINTING -CITY YARD PE 2/15/23
MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231274 TOTAL:
04/05/2023 04142023
FINGERPRINTS -RECRUITMENT PE 3/31/23
RECRUITMENT
CHECK 231275 TOTAL:
04/11/2023 04142023
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE -POST OFFICE 4/23
MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231276 TOTAL:
2,940.00
32.00 32.00
735.00
735.00
03/31/2023 04142023 205.00
SHREDDING SERVICES -CITY HALL/LIBRARY PE 3/21/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 231277 TOTAL:
03/27/2023 04142023
VALET SERVICES -AMPHITHEATER EVENT 3/26/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
CHECK 231278 TOTAL:
205.00
600.00
600.00
231279 04/14/2023 PRTD 1714 DUNN EDWARDS PAINTS 2019429762 03/28/2023 04142023 Invoice: 2019429762 PAINT -CITY YARD
240.06
240.06 10133310 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHECK 231279 TOTAL: 240.06
Report generated : 04/13/2023 11: 50
User : anac
Program ID: apcshds b
4-
2 5
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOIC E
231280 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice : INV215658
105 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC INV215658
231281 04/14/2023 PRTD 2112 TOM ELDRIDGE
Invoice: 56219
373.46 10132000 7618
56219
240.00 10142000 7400
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
03/23/2023 04142023
FAN TUBE/THERMOSTAT KIT -TRAFFIC SIGNALS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
CHECK 231280 TOTAL:
04/12/2022 04142023
EXP REIMB -CERT TRAINING 4/24-27/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 231281 TOTAL:
231282 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 910034667
403 EMCOR SERVICE 910034667 04/04/2023 20230125 04142023 Invoice: 910034941
231283 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 86612
231284 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 56220
231285 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 8 -092-86025
Report g e nerated: 04 /13 /2 02 3 11: 50
User : ana c
Program ID : apcshd sb
RETROFIT ICE MAKER FILTER SYSTEM -FS #50
880.00 21500500 7612 MAINTENANCE
EMCOR SERVICE
73 ESGIL CORPORATION
1333 CHARLES ESSELING
910034941
2,982.25 10133300 7612
1 ,638 .67 10133310 7612
434.00 21500500 7612
497.33 21500690 7612
329.42 21892000 7612
3,250.33 24281000 7612
121.25 24282000 7613
86612
14,631.62 10122000 7430
56220
240.00 10142000 7400
24 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 8-092 -86025
30.47 10154000 8000
04/11/2023 20230125 04142023
HVAC MAINTENANCE 4/23
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
OBSERVATORY MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231282 TOTAL:
03/31/2023 20230029 04142023
PLAN CHECK SERVICES PE 2/28/23
PLAN CHECK SERVICES
CHECK 231283 TOTAL:
04/12/2023 04142023
EXP REIMB -CERT TRAINING 4/24 -27/23
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 231284 TOTAL:
04/07/2023 04142023
EXP MAIL -LEGAL SERVICES 3/30/23
SUPPLIES
NET
373 .46
373.46
240.00
240.00
880.00
9,253.25
10,133.25
14,631.62
14 ,631.62
240.00
240.00
30.47
4-
2 6
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
231286 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice : CM536187
1421 FERGUSON ENTERPRI SES INC #1350 CM536187
-214.39 21892000 8004
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC #1350 2424953
Invoice: 2424953
317 .24 10133310 8004
231287 04/14/2023 PRTD 273 FULTON DISTRIBUTING 600131
Invoice : 600131
131 .50 21891000 8000
FULTON DISTRIBUTING 600238
Invoice: 600238
249.66 21892000 8000
FULTON DISTRIBUTING 600130
Invoice : 600130
333.15 10133310 8000
FULTON DISTRIBUTING 600565
Invoice: 600565
-260.89 10133310 8000
231288 04/14/2023 PRTD 2625 HAROLD M BRUCE 7890492
Invoice: 7890492
1,341.83 10134000 9450
231289 04/14/2023 PRTD 146 THE HOME DEPOT 3021230
Invoice: 3021230
1 ,020.38 10133310 8004
THE HOME DEPOT 3021241
Invoice: 3021241
73.65 10133310 8004
THE HOME DEPOT 11432
Invoice: 11432
389 .96 10133000 8012
Repor t generat e d : 04/13 /20 23 11 : 50
use r: a nac
Program ID : ap cs hdsb
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 231285 TOTAL :
03/18/2020 04142023
RET MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
03/31/2023 04142023
PLUMBING TOOLS -RPR CITY YARD RESTROOM
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHECK 231286 TOTAL:
03/31/2023 04142023
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES -DOG PARK
SUPPLIES
04/03/2023 04142023
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES -RMC PARK
SUPPLIES
03/31/2023 04142023
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES -CITY YARD
SUPPLIES
04/05/2023 04142023
CREDIT RTN JA NITORIAL SUPPLIES -CITY YARD
SUPPLIES
CHECK 231287 TOTAL :
04/03 /2023 04142023
LATERAL FILE CABINETS -CITY HALL
CITY HALL BUILDING IMPROV
CHECK 231288 TOTAL :
02/28/2023 04142023
RECORDS SHELVES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
02 /28/2023 04142023
RECORDS SHELVES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
03/03/2023 04142023
TOOLS FOR JEREMY
SMALL TOOLS , FURN & EQUIP
NET
30.47 -214.39
317.24
102.85
131.50
249.66
333.15
-260.89
453.42
1,341.83
1 ,341.83
1,020.38
73.65 389.96
4-
2 7
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT : 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
THE HOME DEPOT 411243 03/03/2023 04142023 23.15
Invoice: 411243 55 GALLON DRUM-CORY CLAUSON
23.15 21500690 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
THE HOME DEPOT 430896 03/03/2023 04142023 64.63
Invoice: 430896 SUPPLIES -MATT GOTTA
64.63 21500500 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
THE HOME DEPOT 5011998 03/08/2023 04142023 876.63
Invoice: 5011998 WATER HEATER -PARKVIEW VILLAS UNIT 10
876.63 28100000 8012 SMALL TOOLS, FURN & EQUIP
THE HOME DEPOT 400436 03/13/2023 04142023 150 .81
Invoice: 400436 FLOOR FAN -CORY CLAUSON
150.81 21500690 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
THE HOME DEPOT 9022121 03/14/2023 04142023 32 .29
Invoice: 9022121 HOLE SAW FOR JORGE
32.29 10133000 8012 SMALL TOOLS, FURN & EQUIP
THE HOME DEPOT 7022316 03/16/2023 04142023 115.95
Invoice: 7022316 ELECTRICAL
115.95 21500500 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
THE HOME DEPOT 2022496 03/21/2023 04142023 115.64
Invoice: 2022496 TOOLS FOR JEREMY
115. 64 10133000 801.2 SMALL TOOLS, FURN & EQUIP
THE HOME DEPOT 13909 03/23/2023 04142023 1,018 .63
Invoice: 13909 TOOLS -TRAFFIC SIGNALS
1,018.63 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
THE HOME DEPOT 13934 03/23/2023 04142023 25.58
Invoice: 13934 SCREWS FOR STAKEBED -BED
25.58 10133000 7624 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
THE HOME DEPOT 14001 03/23/2023 04142023 9.11
Invoice: 14001 CONCRETE -FARMERS MARKET BANNER
9.11 107 7872 PUBLIC RELATIONS
CHECK 231289 TOTAL: 3,916.41
231290 04/14/2023 PRTD 30 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50765125033023 04/04/2023 04142023 15.43 Invoice: 50765125033023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50765125)
15.43 201 7603 ELECTRICITY
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DI STRICT 50053542033023 04/04/2023 04142023 43.99 Invoice: 50053542033023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50053542)
43.99 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DI STRICT 50337817033023 04/04/2023 04142023 419.38 Report generated : 04/13/2023 11 : 50
user : anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
4-
2 8
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN Invoice: 50337817033023
419.38 10133310 7603
INVOICE DTL DESC
SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50337817)
ELECTRICITY
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50339422033023 04/04/2023 04142023 Invoice: 50339422033023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT# 50339422)
34. 60 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT /ELEC
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50053574033023 04/04/2023 04142023 Invoice: 50053574033023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50053574)
35.08 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50179009033023 04/04/2023 04142023 Invoice: 50179009033023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50179009)
25.21 201 7603 ELECTRICITY
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50214431033023 04/04/2023 04142023 Invoice: 50214431033023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50214431)
30.78 201 7603 ELECTRICITY
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50423112033023 04/04/2023 04142023 Invoice: 50423112033023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50423112)
33.64 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
IMPERIA L IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50474721033023 04/04/2023 04142023 Invoice: 50474721033023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50474721)
75.15 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
Invoice: 50602360033023
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50602360033023 04/04/2023 04142023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50602360)
68 .63 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
Invoice: 50705330033023
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50705330033023 04/04/2023 04142023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50705330)
54.43 21891000 7603 ELECTRICITY
Invoice: 50053535033023
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50053535033023 04/04/2023 04142023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT# 50053535)
118.87 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
Invoice: 50053552033023
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50053552033023 04/04/2023 04142023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50053552)
71.32 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
Invoice: 50321316033023
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50321316033023 04/04/2023 04142023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50321316)
68.63 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
Invoice: 50339421033023
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50339421033023 04/04/2023 04142023 SERVICE PE 3/1/23 (ACCT #50339421)
51.29 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC .
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50409925033023 04/04/2023 04142023 Report ge ne rated: 04/13 /2023 11 : 50
User: an a c
Program IO: apcshdsb
NET
34.60 35.08
25. 21
30.78 33.64
75.15 68.63
54.43 118.87
71.32 68.63
51.29 68.79
4-
2 9
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME
Invoice: 50409925033023
INVOICE
68 .79 10132000 7618
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
SERVICE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50409925)
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 50478828033023 04/04/2023 04142023 Invoice : 50478828033023 SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #50478828)
29.99 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC .SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
CHECK 231290 TOTAL:
231291 04/14/2023 PRTD 1723 LOWES 909305 -KPKEFI 04/02/2023 04142023 Invoice : 909305-KPKEFI CONDUIT FITTINGS -TRAFFIC SIGNALS
4.08 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
LOWES 902671 -KOIPCI 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice : 902671-KOIPCI BUCKETS FOR BATTERIES -LIBRARY
10.19 24281000 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
LOWES 902788 -KPKEFF 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice: 902788-KPKEFF NAILS FOR FENCE -CP 22-378 BUTTON DRIVE
51.17 10134000 9002 LAND IMPROVEMENTS
LOWES 902014 -KPOOPW 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice: 902014-KPOOPW RPR TABLES -LIBRARY CAFE
22.90 24281000 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
'LOWES 902989 -KQKZVZ 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice: 902989 -KQKZVZ DRILL BITS -YARD
103.95 10133310 8012 SMALL TOOLS, FURN & EQUIP
LOWES 902666 -KQWTMQ 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice: 902666 -KQWTMQ EXTENSION CORD -AMBULANCE CART
29.36 10142000 8000 SUPPLIES
LOWES 910244-KQWTNE 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice: 910244-KQWTNE CATS TESTER/COUPLERS -TRAFFIC SIGNALS
57.29 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
LOWES 902926-KRBVWP 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice: 902926-KRBVWP PAINT SUPPLIES -CITY YARD
90.76 10133300 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
LOWES 909695 -KRBVWV 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice: 909695-KRBVWV BLUE BOX MATERIALS -RMC PARK
93.10 21892000 8004 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
LOWES 902258 -KSDLCR 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice: 902258 -KSDLCR CONCRETE -TRAFFIC SIGNALS
9.18 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
LOWES 903968 -KSDLCV 04/02/2023 04142023
Invoice: 903968-KSDLCV CONCRETE -FARMERS MARKET SIGN
Report generated: 04/13/2023 11 : 50
User: anac
Program ID : apcshdsb
NET
29.99 1,245.21
4.08 10.19
51.17 22.90
103.95
29. 36
57.29 90.76
93.10 9.18
4. 59
4-
3 0
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME
LOWES
Invoice: 909711-KSDLCW
LOWES
Invoice: 902570-KSNXGI
231292 04/14 /2023 PRTD 2736 JUAN SAUCEDO
Invoice: 1101
231293 04/14/2023 PRTD 2914 JORDAN FREEMAN
Invoice: MWG2234
INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
4.59 107 7872 PUBLIC RELATIONS
909711-KSDLCW 04/02/2023 04142023
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -TRAFFIC SIGNALS
35 .31 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
902570-KSNXGI 04/02/2023 04142023
MOVING BOXES -CITY YARD
70.57 10133310 8000 SUPPLIES
1101
2,350.00 24281000 7612
MWG2234
240.82 10141000 7624
CHECK 231291 TOTAL:
04/03/2023 04142023
INSTALL TWO WATER SHUT OFF VALVES
MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231292 TOTAL:
03/28/2023 04142023
SVC -SHERIFF MOTORCYCLE 3/28/23
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231293 TOTAL:
231294 04/14 /2023 PRTD 437 NAI CONSULTING INC 2019-04.39 04/06/2023 20230065 04142023 Invoice : 2019-04.39 CP 14-313: CALTRANS COMPLIANCE PE 3/31 /23 1 ,046.50 10134000 9523 RMN RD ST WID/FR RGT/SND
CHECK 231294 TOTAL.:
231295 04/14/2023 PRTD 2852 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS , LLC 305145232001 03 /31/2023 04142023 Invoice: 305145232001 REGISTER THERMAL PAPER -LIBRARY
124.86 24281000 8000 SUPPLIES
Invoice: 305201563001
ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 305201563001 03/31/2023
RECEIPT BOOK -LIBRARY
04142023
72.68 24281000 8000 SUPPLIES
NET
35.31 70. 57
582.45
2,350 .00
2 ,350.00
240.82
240.82
1,046.50
1 ,046.50
124.86
72.68 Invoice: 305204466001
ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 305204466001 03/31/2023 04142023 168.57 231296 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 2830
Report g e ne r a ted: 04/13 /2 023 11: SO
user : a na c
Program ID : a pcs hd s b
PEN/PACKING TAPE /POST-IT NOTES/ENVELOPES/CUPS
168.57 24281000 8000 SUPPLIES
205 ON TIME MOVING SERVICES 2830
1 ,255.00 10133310 7612
CHECK 231295 TOTAL:
04/03/2023 04142023
MOVE FURNITURE -CITY YARD 3/31-4/2/23
MAINTENANCE
366.11
1,255.00
4-
3 1
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME
231297 04/14/2023 PRTD 99999 DEBBIE CASDEN
Invoice: SR20230292
231298 04/14/2023 PRTD 99999 MARC SAMPLIN
Invoice: SR20230293
231299 04/14/2023 PRTD 99999 REBECCA ALMQUIST
Invoice: SR20230291
231300 04/14/2023 PRTD 295 OVERDRIVE INC
Invoice: 01187C023114337
OVERDRIVE INC
Invoice: 01187C023109247
Invoice: 01187DA23106866
QVERDRIVE INC
INVOICE INV .DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 231296 TOTAL:
SR20230292 04/06/2023 04142023
SOLAR REBATE
500.00 600 7426 RESIDENTIAL SOLAR REBATE PRGM
CHECK 231297 TOTAL:
SR20230293 04/06/2023 04142023
SOLAR REBATE
500.00 600 7426 RESIDENTIAL SOLAR REBATE PRGM
CHECK 231298 TOTAL:
SR20230291 04/06/2023 04142023
SOLAR REBATE
500.00 600 7426 RESIDENTIAL SOLAR REBATE PRGM
CHECK 231299 TOTAL:
01187co23114337 04/10/2023 04142023
EBOOKS
83.67 E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED ~UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
01187C023109247 04/04/2023 04142023
EBOOKS & AUDIOBOOKS
422.50
E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
01187DA23106866 04/02/2023 04142023
AUDIOBOOKS
69.95 E LB_ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION -COLLECTION
CHECK 231300 TOTAL:
231301 04/14/2023 PRTD 1893 PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES LLC 31637 Invo i ce: 31637
03/15/2023 04142023
REGULATORY SIGNS
2,450.45 10132000 8003 STREET SIGNS & MARKINGS
Report generated : 04 /13 /2023 11: 50
user : anac
Program I D: ap c shdsb
NET
1,255.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
83.67 422. 50
69.95 576.12
2,450.45
4-
3 2
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 231301 TOTAL: 2,450.45
-,
231302 04/14/2023 PRTD -45 PALM SPRINGS MOTORS INC 850805 04/06/2023 04142023 148 .61 Invoice: 8 50805 SVC/SMOG -FL16 CMAX POOL VEHI CLE 4/6/23 148.61 10151000 7624 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
PALM SPRINGS MOTORS INC 850860 04/10/2023 04142023 80. 50 Invoice: 850860 SVC -FL08 POOL VEHICLE 4/10/23
80.50 10151000 7624 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
PALM SPRINGS MOTORS INC 851091 04/10/2023 04142023 143.22 Invoice : 851091 SVC/SMOG -CC03 CODE VEHICLE 4/10/23
143 .22 10123000 7624 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
PALM SPRINGS MOTORS INC 851193 04/12/2023 04142023 149 .20 Invoice: 851193 SVC/SMOG -CC02 CODE VEHICLE 4/12/23
149.20 10123000 7624 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231302 TOTAL: 521. 5 3
231303 04/14/2023 PRTD 423 PATTON ENTERPRISES INC. 91043 04/11/2023 04142023 125 .00 Invoice: 91043 BAY DOOR MAINT -FS #50 4/3/23
125.00 21500500 7612 MAINTENANCE
PATTON ENTERPRISES INC. 91037 04/11/2023 04142023 125 .00 Invoice: 91037 BAY DOOR MAINT -FS #69 4/3/23
125.00 21500690 7612 MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231303 TOTAL: 250.00
231304 04/14/2023 PRTD 2832 PEOPLEREADY INC 28011291 03/28/2023 04142023 1,515.60 Invoice: 28011291 A. PEREZ PE 3/26/23
1,515.60 10132000 7444 TEMPORARY AGENCY SERVICES
PEOPLEREADY INC 28022755 04/04/2023 04142023 1,515.60
Invoice: 28022755 A. PEREZ PE 4/2/23
1,515.60 10132000 7444 TEMPORARY AGENCY SERVICES
PEOPLEREADY INC 28035736 04/11/2023 04142023 1,515 .00
Invoice : 28035736 A. PEREZ PE 4/9/23
1,515.00 10132000 7444 TEMPORARY AGENCY SERVICES
CHECK 231304 TOTAL: 4,546.20
231305 04/14/2023 PRTD 1995 PRISM SC SYSTEMS, INC 201317 03/17/2023 04142023 350.00 Invoice: 201317 SVC/CALIBRATE ROBOTIC STN -RIV CO SHERIFF 350.00 10141000 7400 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
Report generated : 04/13/2023 11: 50
User : anac
Program ID: apc s hdsb
4-
3 3
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
231306 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 21503
197 PVP COMMUNICATIONS INC 21503
2,873.68 10141000 8020
INV DATE PO
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK
03/07/2023
HELMET -SHERIFF
UNIFORMS
CHECK
CHECK RUN NET
231305 TOTAL: 350.00
04142023 2,873.68
231306 TOTAL:
231307 04/14/2023 PRTD 1566 RICHARD K YATES
Invoice: QES033123
QES033123 03/31/2023 04142023
2,873.68
1,981.83
ELECTRICAL WORK -CITY YARD OFFICES
1,981.83 10133300 7612 MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231307 TOTAL: 1,981.83
231308 04/14/2023 PRTD 1827 QUINN COMPANY
Invoice: WOG00015675
WOG00015675 02/02/2023 20230218 04142023 1,776.04
BI-ANNUAL EMERGENCY GENERATOR MAINT -CITY HALL
1,776.04 10133300 7612 MAINTENANCE
231309 04/14/2023 PRTD 2766 REDZONE SECURITY INC 1735
Invoice: 1735
Invoice: 1803
Invoice: 1802
231310 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 4002633
231311 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 4147291
Invoice: 4145220
Report generated : 04/13/2023 11: 50
user: anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
180.00 10172000 7494
REDZONE SECURITY INC 1803
360.00 107 7872
REDZONE SECURITY INC 1802
1,050.00 10172000 7494
31 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY INC 4002633
81.56 21891000 8004
131 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 4147291
151.85 10133310 8700
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 4145220
CHECK 231308 TOTAL:
02/10/2023 20230204 04142023
SECURITY SVCS -CV SYMPHONY 1/29/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
1,776.04
180.00
04/07/2023 20230204 04142023 360.00
SECURITY SVCS -FARMER '·S MARKET 3/24/23 & 3/31/23
PUBLIC RELATIONS
04/07/2023 20230204 04142023
SECURITY SVCS -CV SYMPHONY 3/25-26/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
CHECK 231309 TOTAL:
03/21/2023 04142023
ROTOR -DOG PARK
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHECK 231310 TOTAL:
1,050.00
1,590.00
81. 56
81. 56
03/16/2023 04142023 151.85
.CITY YARD AQMD FEE FY 22/23-FACILITY ID #146479
MISC EXPENDITURE
03/16/2023 04142023 607.32
ELECTRIC GEN -DIESEL -#F79403 FACILITY ID 146479
4-
3 4
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN 231312 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 5093032823
Invoice: 4604032923
Invoice: 9548033023
Invoice: 6812033023
Invoice: 0086033123
Invoice: 6905040323
607.32 10133310 8700
61 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPAN 5093032823
1,063.50 21500500 7603
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPAN 4604032923
8.63 201 7603
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPAN 9548033023
542.11 201 7603
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPAN 6812033023
154.83 21895000 7603
194.76 21892000 7603
55.66 21893000 7603
INVOICE DTL DESC
MISC EXPENDITURE
CHECK 231311 TOTAL:
03/31/2023 04142023
SERVICE PE 3/28/23 (ACCT #700485325093)
ELECTRICITY
04/03/2023 04142023
SERVICE PE 3/29/23 (ACCT #700484394604)
ELECTRICITY
04/04/2023 04142023
SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT# 700183359548)
ELECTRICITY
04/04/2023 04142023
SERVICE PE 3/30/23 (ACCT #700349196812)
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
ELECTRICITY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPAN 0086033123 04/05/2023 04142023 SERVICE PE 3/31/23 (ACCT# 700052520086)
1,605.03 10132000 7603 ELECTRICITY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPAN 6905040323 04/06/2023 04142023 SERVICE PE 4/03/23 (ACCT# 700394436905)
1,660.51 10132000 7618 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT/ELEC
CHECK 231312 TOTAL:
231313 04/14/2023 PRTD 62 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 80665040323 04/05/2023 04142023 Invoice: 80665040123 SERVICE PE 4/3/23 (ACCT# 170-464-8066-5) 231314 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 56198
Invoice: 56207
181.46 10133310 7600 NATURAL GAS
CHECK 231313 TOTAL:
233 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 56198 04/12/2023 04142023
Payroll Run 1 -warrant 041423
260.00 101 2260 CHILD SUPPORT
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 56207 04/12/2023 04142023
CHILD SUPPORT PE 04/07/23
126.92 101 2260 CHILD SUPPORT
NET
759.17
1,063.50
8.63 542.11
405. 25
1,605.03
1,660.51
5,285.03
181.46
181.46
260.00
126.92
CHECK 231314 TOTAL: 386.92
Report generated: 04/13/2023 11: 50
User: anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
4-
3 5
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOIC E
231315 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: INV06758
231316 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 9528608158
231317 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 2061553
231318 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice : 327231
231319 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice : 1099102
Invoice: 1099101
231320 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice : 56197
231321 04/14/2023 'PRTD
Invoice : 14095201
Report generated : 04/13/20 23 11: 50
User : anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
532 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY INV06758
3,655.16 10133000 7612
2824 T-MOBILE USA INC 9528608158
125.00 10141000 7400
2804 TEK PAYROLL TIME SYSTEMS INC 2061553
271.54 10151000 8000
1220 JOHN MICKELSON 327231
130.21 10133310 7612
67 TOPS N BARRICADES, INC 1099102
1 ,118.40 10132000 8003
TOPS N BARRICADES, INC 1099101
1,300.00 10132000 8003
68 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 56197
8.85 101 2250
2888 UNIVERSAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE, L 14095201
100.00 107 7872
UNIVERSAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE, L 14095202
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
03/31/2023 20230007 04142023 3,655.16
BUS SHELTER MAINTENANCE 3/23
MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231315 TOTAL: 3,655.16
03/23/2023 04142023 125 .00
RIV CO SHERIFF PE 2/25/2023
PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 231316 TOTAL : 125 .00
03/27/2023 04142023 271. 54
RPR DATE STAMP -ADMIN
SUPPLIES
CHECK 231317 TOTAL : 271.54
03/27/2023 04142023 130 .21
INSTL WALL PLATES -OFFICE CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231318 TOTAL: 130.21
03/20/2023 04142023 1,118.40
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS -LIBRARY 3/13-17/23
STREET SIGNS & MARKINGS
03/20/2023 04142023 1,300.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS -HWY 111/CC 2/28 -3/19/23
STREET SIGNS & MARKINGS
CHECK
04/12/2023
UNITED WAY PE 04/07/23
DONATIONS-UNITED WAY
CHECK
231319 TOTAL:
04142023
231320 TOTAL:
03/30/2023 20230133 04142023
JANITORIAL SVCS -FARMER'S MARKET 3/24/23
PUBLIC RELATIONS
2,418.40
8.85 8.85
100.00
03/30/2023 20230133 04142023 200.00
4-
3 6
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
Invoice: 14095202
Invoice: 14095203
Invoice: 14095204
200.00 10172000 7494
UNIVERSAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE, L 14095203
100.00 10172000 7494
UNIVERSAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE, L 14095204
100.00 10172000 7494
231322 04/14/202 .3 PRTD 2446 UNIVERSAL GENERAL & ENGINEERING I 684 Invoice: 684
231323 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice : 180303
231324 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 1
Invoice: 2
13,800.00 24281000 9536
174 VALLEY LOCK & SAFE 180303
195. 00 10133300 7612
2924 THE VAN DYKE CORPORATION 1
239,962.20 10134000 9600
-11,998.11 101 2050
THE VAN DYKE CORPORATION 2
399,667.50 10134000 9600
-19,983.38 101 2050
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
JANITORIAL SVCS -CV SYMPHONY 3/26/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
03/30/2023 20230133 04142023
JANITORIAL SVCS -AMPHITHEATER 3/27/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
03/30/2023 20230133 04142023
JANITORIAL SVCS -AMPHITHEATER 3/29/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
CHECK 231321 TOTAL:
NET
100.00
100.00
500 .00
03/27/2023 20230290 04142023 13,800.00
INSTALL NEW TILE/PAINT -LIBRARY CHILDREN'S ROOM
LIBRARY INFRASTRUCTURE
CHECK 231322 TOTAL:
03/30/2023 04142023
IT TECH SUPPORT -CITY HALL
MAINTENANCE
CHECK 231323 TOTAL:
02/28/2023 20230193 04142023
13,800.00
195 .00
195.00
227,964.09
CP 20-365: UTILITY UNDERGROUND PROJECT PE 2/28/23
WATER/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
RETENTION PAYABLE
03/31/2023 20230193 04142023 379,684.12
CP 20-365: UTILITY UNDERGROUND PROJECT PE 3/31/2
WATER/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
RETENTION PAYABLE
CHECK 231324 TOTAL: 607,648.21
231325 04/14/2023 PRTD 2535 VISTA PAINT CORPORATION 2023 -935780 -00 03/29/2023 04142023 Invoice: 2023-935780 -00 RED CURB PAINT
2,265.50
2,265.50 10132000 8003 STREET SIGNS & MARKINGS
Invoice: 2023 -937178 -00
VISTA PAINT CORPORATION 2023-937178-00 03/30/2023 04142023
PAINT SPRAY TIPS
347 .91
347.91 10132000 8003 STREET SIGNS & MARKINGS
CHECK 231325 TOTAL: 2,613 .41
Report generated: 04/13/2023 11 : 50
user: anac
Program ID : apcshdsb
4-
3 7
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
231326 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: INV-00950
2119 VIVID STAGING SOLUTIONS INV-00950
231327 04/14/2023 PRTD
Invoice: 6246-1
650.00 10172000 7494
473 THE WORKS FLOOR & WALL 6246-1
8,267.23 10133310 8004
231328 04/14/2023 PRTD 1180 ZERO WASTE USA INC. 540798
Invoice: 540798
600.00 21891000 8000
350.11 21892000 8000
350.12 21893000 8000
352.12 10132000 8000
231329 04/14/2023 PRTD 2995 ZER09 SOLUTIONS LTD 1083-B2B Invoice: 1083-B2B
2,747.16 10141000 8910
INV DATE PO CHECK RUN
INVOICE DTL DESC
01/24/2023 20230298 04142023
AUDIO -AMPHITHEATER 1/29/23
AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING
CHECK 231326 TOTAL:
04/03/2023 20230282 04142023
PURCHASE/INSTALL CARPET -CITY YARD
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHECK
04/06/2023
TRASH BAGS -.CITY PARKS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
CHECK
231327 TOTAL:
04142023
231328 TOTAL:
04/06/2023 20230297 04142023
TACTICAL VESTS CASES -SHERIFF
OTHER EQUIPMENT
CHECK 231329 TOTAL:
NUMBER OF CHECKS 105 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL ***
Report generated: 04/13/2023 11: 50
user: anac
Program ID: apcshdsb
TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS
TOTAL EFT'S
COUNT AMOUNT
70 838,366.42
35 241,609.87
''** GRAND TOTAL ***
NET
650.00
650.00
8,267.23
8,267.23
1,652 .35
1,652.35
2,747.16
2,747.16
1,079,976.29
1,079,976.29
5-1
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF ~ MIRAG~
~ 21 ·_
STAFF REPORT
Mayor and City Council
Joy Tsai, Senior Planner
DATE: April 20, 2023
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22 -0018, Preliminary Development Plan Case No . PDP22 -0004, and Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 -Linea
SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
A. Find Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0004 and Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15061(b)(3) and determine that the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA070003 is still valid for the proposed project; B. Approve Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0004, subject to the conditions of approval and based on the content and findings in the staff report; and C. Approve Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 to change "Bellavia Court South" to "Via Linea," based on the content and findings in the staff report.
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION
PROJECT SUMMARY
The applicant, Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects, and owner, Linea Rancho Mirage, LLC, are requesting approval of a Preliminary Development Plan application to construct nine single- family residences on the southern half of Tract No. 35089 between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia in Section 30 ("Project"). The project consists of three house design concepts and range in size from 4,870 to 5,688 square feet, in addition to front yard landscaping. The owner is also requesting to change the current street name of Bellavia Court South to Via Linea to better fit their proposed development theme.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
On February 27, 2023, the Architectural Review Board (ARB) conducted a public meeting to discuss the proposed development plan application . No public comments Were received during the public meeting . As summarized in the minutes attached to this report, the ARB members asked questions to which staff and the applicant answered. The ARB meeting minutes are included as Attachment 5 .
AGENDA ITEM#
5-2
DATE: April 20, 2023 Page 2 of 3
EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED
After the board's discussion, ARB Member Milander made a motion to recommend the project to the Planning Commission as presented. Board Member Sanborn seconded the motion.
A roll call vote was taken, and the motion carried 5/0 with Board Member Greenwood recused.
PLANNING COMMISSION
On March 23, 2023, the Planning Commission · conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project. During the public hearing, one member of the public spoke in opposition of the project and raised concerns about affordable housing. As summarized in the minutes attached to this report, the Commissioners' asked questions to which staff answered. The Planning Commission staff report, and draft minutes are included as Attachments 4 and 6.
After due consideration of the staff report, presentation, and public testimony, the Planning Commission made the following motion:
MOVED/SECONDED BY BRYANT/CHANTER TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:
A. FIND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CASE NO. PDP22-0004 AND STREET NAME CHANGE CASE NO. STN22-0001 TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15162 AND 15061(8)(3) AND DETERMINE THAT THE PREVIOUSLY
ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CASE NO. EA070003 IS STILL VALID FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT; AND,
B. APPROVE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CASE NO. PDP22-0004, SUBJECT
TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND BASED ON THE CONTENT AND FINDINGS IN THE STAFF REPORT; AND,
C. APPROVE STREET NAME CHANGE CASE NO. STN22-0001 TO CHANGE "BELLAVIA COURT SOUTH" TO "VIA LiNEA," BASED ON THE CONTENT AND FINDINGS IN THE STAFF REPORT.
MOTION CARRIED 4/0.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The previously approved project (Tentative Tract Map No .. 35089 and Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP07004) for an eighteen-lot single-family residential subdivision and a development plan was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA070003, the City prepared and filed an Initial Study and a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project.
A Notice of Availability was filed and posted with the Riverside County Clerk on February 25, 2008. On September 4, 2008, the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted, and the tentative map and development plan permit applications approved. A Notice of Determination was filed with the Riverside County Clerk on October 16, 2008.
AGENDA ITEM#
5-3
DATE: April 20, 2023 Page 3 of 3
EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) provides that when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that there are no new significant environmental effects due to a change in the project or circumstances, and there is no new information of substantial importance as identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). The proposed project is a request to construct nine single-family residences on the southern half of Tract No. 35089 between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia. The project consists of three house concepts and range in size from 4,870 to 5,688 square feet. With respect to the proposed project, the revisions from the previously approved development plan application are only minor technical changes that do not result in any new significant environmental effect(s). Such minor changes include the landscape planting palette, site and floor plans, color and material schemes, and architecture style of the residences. The current request does not propose to amend the project boundaries, uses, or development intensities of the original approval. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 ,· the City analyzed whether the revisions would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in severity of previously identified impacts. Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0018 and the City's analysis, no subsequent EIR, supplemental EIR, or subsequent mitigation negative declaration is required. Moreover, street name changes are exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3) because the changing of street names has no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment. No further environmental review is required.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
On April 5, 2023, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the parcel boundary and posted at the City's designated community posting sites pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 17.74 of the Municipal Code. Notification of the public hearing was published in The Desert Sun on April 9, 2023. Any information addressed to the City Council, but received after completion of this final report, will be distributed at the public hearing. No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report.
ATTACHMENT(S):
1 . Aerial Photo
2. Public Hearing Notice
3. Draft Notice of Exemption
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 23, 2023 (Without Attachments)
5. Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes dated February 27, 2023
6. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated March 23, 2023
7. Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration
8. Notice of Determination dated September 5, 2008
9 . Exhibit Booklet
AGENDA ITEM#
5-4
Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0018
Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0004
Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001
AERIAL PHOTO
ATTACHMENT 1
N
A
5-5
~ CIN OF RANCHO MIRAGE NT 2
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Planning Division
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Phone 760/328-2266
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Thursday, April 20, 2023 -1 :00 p.m.
Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0018
Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0004
Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 ("Project")
Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects for Linea Rancho Mirage, LLC Consideration to construct 9 single -family residences on 4.63 acres of vacant land on the southern half of Tract Map No. 35089 between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia. The project consists of 3 house concepts and range from 4,870 to 5,688 square feet. This project also includes a request to change the street name of Bellavia Court South to Via Linea .
Section 30, south of Ginger Rogers Road and approximately 1,110 feet east from the Bob Hope Drive centerline. APNs: 685-351-001 through -016 .
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the City of Rancho Mirage CITY COUNCIL RE : consideration of the above referenced application pursuant to Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Title 17. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15162, the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA070003 for this project is still valid. A Notice of Determination was filed and posted on October 16, 2008 .
Street name changes have no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment and therefore, such an action is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3).
No further environmental review is required .
The Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, April 20, 2023 , at 1 :00 p .m ., in the Council Chamber, 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, at which time and place pertinent testimony will be heard . The file, including all environmental information, is available for public inspection at City Hall, Monday through Friday, between 8 :00 a.m . and 5:00 p.m.
Written testimony may be submitted to the City Clerk via email to [email protected], or mailed to City of Rancho Mirage , ATTN: City Clerk, 69- 825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. Written testimony must be received no later than 10:00 a.m. on the day of the meeting to be considered by the City Council.
GOVERNMENT CODE§ 65009 NOTICE: If you challenge this proposed activity in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public
5-6
EA22-0018 , PDP22-0004 , STN22-0001 April 20 , 2023
Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council sufficiently prior to the Public Hearing to enable its consideration by them.
Vicinity Map -Not to Scale
a CIT Of-! CAl11ED lCITY
c+W-t .SHORE O.~
N ORTH
5-7
Phone 760/328-2266
Development Services Department
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage CA 92270
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
ATTACHMENT 3
Fax 7 60/324-985 l
To: D Office of Planning and Research
P .O. Box 3044
~ Chief Deputy County Clerk
3470 12th Street
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 Riverside, CA 92501
Project Title/Case Nos. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0018, Preliminary Development Plan Case No.
PDP22 -0004, and Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 -Linea Project Location:
The project site is located in
Section 30 on the south side of
Ginger Rogers Road and
approximately 1,110 feet east
from the Bob Hope Drive
centerline. APN: 685-351-001
through -016
Applicant/Representative:
Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects on
behalf of Linea Rancho Mirage , LLC
44530 San Pablo Ave , Ste 200
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Project Description:
Construct 9 single-family residences
on the southern half of Tract No.
35089 between Ginger Rogers Road
and Via Florencia. The project consists
of 3 house concepts and range in size
from 4,870 to 5,688 square feet. This
project includes a request to change the
current street name of Bellavia Court
South to Via Linea.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:
City of Rancho Mirage Joy Tsai
Senior Planner
Exempt Status: ( check one}
D Ministerial (Sec. 2108o(b)(1); 15268); D Declared Emergency [Sec. 2108o(b)(3); 15269(a)] D Emergency Project [Sec. 2108o(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)]; D Statutory Exemption; Code NQ _______ _ D Categorical Exemption. State type and Section number: ____________________ _ IZI Other. State type and Section number: CEOA Guidelines Section 15162 -Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations ; Section 15061(b)(3) Common Sense Exemption (Street Name Change) Reasons why project is exempt: The previously approved project (Tentative Tract Map No. 35089 and Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP07004) for an eighteen-lot single-family residential subdivision and a development plan was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA). Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA070003, the City prepared and filed an Initial Study and a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. A Notice of Availability was filed and posted with the Riverside County Clerk on February 25, 2008. On September 4, 2008, the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted, and the tentative map and development plan permit applications approved. A Notice of Determination was filed with the Riverside County Clerk on October 16, 2008.No CEOA challenge was filed.
CEOA Guidelines Sectfon 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) provides that when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead
5-8
agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that there are no new significant environmental effects due to a change in the project or circumstances, and there is no new information of substantial importance as identified in CEOA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). The proposed project is a request to construct nine single-family residences on the southern half of Tract No. 35089 between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia. The project consists of three house concepts and range in size from 4,870 to 5,688 square feet. With respect to the proposed project, the revisions from the previously approved development plan application are only minor technical changes that do not result in any new significant environmental effect(s). Such minor changes include the landscape planting palette, site and floor plans, color and material schemes, and architecture style of the residences. The current request does not propose to amend the project boundaries, uses, or development intensities of the original approval. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEOA Guidelines Section 15162, the City analyzed whether the revisions would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in severity of previously identified impacts . Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0018 and the City's analysis, no subsequent EIR, supplemental EIR, or subsequent mitigation negative declaration is required. Moreover, the changing of street names has no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment and therefore, such an action is not subject to CEOA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). No further environmental review is required .
Lead Agency Contact Person: Joy Tsai, Senior Planner Telephone No. (760) 328-2266 Date: _____ _
Joy Tsai, Senior Planner
1:8] Signed by Lead Agency Date Received for filing at OPR: ________________ _
5-9
ATTACHMENT 4
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Planning Commission
Joy Tsai, Senior Planner
DATE: March 23, 2023
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment Case No . EA22-0018, Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0004, and Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 -Linea
SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
A Recommend that the City Council find Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22 - 0004 and Street Name Change Case No . STN22-0001 exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15061 (b)(3) and determine that the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration based on Environmental Assessment Case No . EA070003 is still valid for the proposed project; and,
B. Recommend that the City Council approve Preliminary Development Plan Case No.
PDP22-0004, subject to the conditions of approval and based on the content and findings in the staff report; and ,
C . Recommend that the City Council approve Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 to change "Bellavia Court South" to "Via Linea," based on the content and findings in the staff report .
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial Photo
2. Public Hearing Notice
3. Draft Notice of Exemption
4. Draft Architectural Review Board
Meeting Minutes dated February 27,
· 2023
FACTS
1. Applicant:
2. Purpose of Request:
Planning Commission Staff Report
5. Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration
6 . Notice of Determination dated September 5,
2008
7. Exhibit Booklet
Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects on behalf of
Linea Rancho Mirage, LLC
Construct 9 single -family residences on the
southern half of Tract No. 35089 between Ginger
AGENDA ITEM#
5-10
DATE: March 23 1 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 2 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
3. Location :
4. Parcel Size :
5 . Existing Streets:
6. Existing Land Use :
7. Existing General Plan/Zoning :
8 . Surrounding Land Use :
9. Surrounding General Plan/Zoning:
10 . Environmental Information:
11. Application Deemed Complete
SUMMARY
Rogers Road and Via Florencia . The project
consists of 3 house concepts and range in size from
4,870 to 5,688 square feet. This project includes a
request to change the current street name of
Bellavia Court South to Via Linea .
The project site is located in Section 30 on the south
side of Ginger Rogers Road and approximately
1,110 feet east from the Bob Hope Drive centerline .
APN : 685-351 -001 through -016
201,682 square feet (4.63 acres)
Ginger Rogers Road, Via Florencia, & Bellavia
Court South
Undeveloped residential tract
Very Low Density Residential (2 d.u./acre max . [R -
L-21)
N: Undeveloped residential tract (TR 35089); E, S,
& W: Vacant
All adjacent properties are also designed Very Low
Density Residential (R-L -2)
This Project is exempt from the requirements of
CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15162. A previously adopted Mitigated Negative
Declaration based on Environmental Assessment
Case No . EA070003 is still valid for this project. No
substantial changes are proposed to the project
and no potential new impacts have been identified
that would require further environmental review.
Street name changes are exempt from CEQA
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3).
February 17, 2023
The applicant , Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects, and owner, Andrew Adler of Linea Rancho Mirage, LLC , are requesting approval of a Preliminary Development Plan application to construct nine single-family residences on the southern half of Tract No. 35089 between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia in Section 30 . The project consists of. three house design concepts and range in size from 4,870 to 5,688 square feet, in addition to front yard landscaping . The owner is also requesting to change the current street name of Bellavia Court South to Via Linea to better fit their proposed development theme.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located in Section 30, which is bounded on the north by Dinah Shore Drive, on the south by Gerald Ford Drive, on the east by Monterey Avenue, and on the west by Bob Hope Drive. The west half of Section 30 was annexed from the County of Riverside to the City in 1994 . A Master Circulation Plan for Section 30 was approved in 1999 with the intent to Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-11
DATE: March 23 1 2023 EA22-0018 1 PDP22-0004 1 STN22-0001 Page 3 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
address drainage constraints and traffic issues, and last amended on December 18, 2014 for the realignment of Via Florencia. The subject property is also subject to the Section 30 Design Guidelines, which contain provisions for enhanced landscaped parkways, walls, vehicular access gates, and subdivision entrances. The City Council last amended the Design Guidelines in 2009.
The original project, commonly known as "Bellavia ," consisted of a tentative tract map and development plan application (Case No. TTM35089 and PDP07004) and was approved by the City Council on September 4, 2008, along with the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Bellavia consisted of the subdivision of two 5.04-acre parcels into eighteen single-family residential lots and lettered lots for common areas . The original project also included a preliminary development plan, which provided the site plan, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscaping. The lot sizes range from 15,462 to 22,259 square feet with the average lot size of 17,710 square feet.
The preliminary development plan application approval expired in 2010. However, the tentative map received automatic time extensions as a result of State legislation in 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016 before it was ultimately recorded in 2018. After recordation of the map, the eighteen-lot subdivision was separated and sold to two individual property owners, with the current property owner taking possession of the southern half of the subdivision between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia consisting of nine lots .
The tentative tract map was approved prior to the passing of Ordinance No. 1086, which comprised of a city-initiated Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) adopted on November 6, 2014. Said Ordinance changed the minimum lot size required under the Very Low Density Residential (R - L-2) zoning designation from 15,000 square feet to 18,000 square feet. Twelve of the eighteen lots do not meet the current minimum lot size for the R-L-2 zoning district; however, it was determined that because the original subdivider submitted their project well before the city- initiated ZTA was adopted, they would not be subject to the revised lot sizes. The approved tentative map meets the lot size requirements under the previous development code.
Architectural Review Board
On February 27, 2023, the Architectural Review Board (ARB) conducted a public meeting to discuss the proposed development plan application . No public comments were received during the public meeting . As summarized in the minutes attached to this report, the ARB members asked questions to which staff and the applicant answered. The ARB draft minutes are included as Attachment 4.
After the board's discussion, ARB Member Milander made a motion to recommend the project to the Planning Commission as presented. Board Member Sanborn seconded the motion . A roll call vote was taken, and the motion carried 5/0 with Board Member Greenwood recused.
Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses The subject property is rectangular-shaped, elongated in the north-south direction, and measures approximately 330 feet wide by 595 feet long . The subject property is bounded by Ginger Rogers Road to the north, Via Florencia to the south, and undeveloped parcels to the east and west. The project site is currently undergoing subdivision improvements.
Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-12
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 4 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
The General Plan and zoning designation of the project site is R-L-2 (Very Low Density Residential with a maximum of two dwelling units per acre). All adjacent properties have the General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation of R-L-2 . The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property:
General Plan and Zoning Designation Land Use
Project Site Very Low Density Residential (R-L-2) Vacant North Very Low Density Residential (R-L-2) Undeveloped residential tract (Tract No. 35089 "Bellavia North")
East Very Low Density Residential (R-L-2) Vacant
South Very Low Density Residential (R-L-2) Vacant
West Very Low Density Residential (R-L-2) Vacant
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed development plan is for the approval of nine detached single-family residences situated in the gated subdivision on the south side of Ginger Rogers Road, similar to other residential subdivisions in the vicinity. Access to the lots is provided by the private street off Ginger Rogers Road. The project consists of three house design concepts and range in size from 4,870 to 5,688 square feet, in addition to front yard landscaping concepts. The owner is also requesting to change the current street name of Bellavia Court South to Via Linea to better fit their proposed development theme.
The City Engineer approved a Lot Line Adjustment (LLA 22-04) on January 12, 2023, for Lots 15 and 16 to reduce the number of lots that do not meet the current minimum lot size from seven to six lots. The current lot sizes range from 15,462 to 18,243 square feet with the average lot size of 17,046 square feet. The land use and gross lot size of each parcel are provided in the table below:
Lot Size Land Use -
Lot 10 15,983 sq. ft. (0.37 ac) Single-family residential Lot 11 16,834 sq . ft . (0.39 ac) Single -family residential Lot 12 15,462 SQ. ft. (0.35 ac) Sinqle-family residential Lot 13 16,148 sq. ft. (0.37 ac) Sinole-family residential Lot 14 16,919 SQ. ft . (0 .39 ac) Sinqle-family residential Lot 15 18,159 SQ. ft . (0.42 ac) Single-family residential Lot 16 18,159 sq. ft . (0.42 ac) Single-family residential Lot 17 17,510 sq. ft . (0.40 ac) Single -family residential Lot 18 18,243 sq . ft . (0.42 ac) Single-family residential Lot D 23,348 sq . ft. (0 .54 ac) Private street
Lot G 5,271 SQ. ft. (0.12 ac) Landscaped parkway
Lot H 4,922 SQ . ft . (0 .11 ac) Landscaped parkway
Lot I 6,839 sQ. ft. (0.16 ac) Landscaped parkway and retention basin Lot J 1,873 SQ. ft. (0.04 ac) Landscaped parkway
Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-13
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 5 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
Lot K
Lot L 2,134 s . ft. 0.05 ac
ANALYSIS
Review Authority (Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Section 17.34.010) The proposed project requires City Council review and approval of two entitlement applications:
Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) and a Street · Name Change. The development plan application requires City Council approval, whereas street name changes require Planning Commission approval. Municipal Code Section 17 .36.020 requires all applications to be processed simultaneously by the highest review authority . Therefore, the Planning Commission's role in this matter is to forward a recommendation to the City Council for the two discretionary entitlements described below.
Development Plan Permit (RMMC Chapter 17.42)
The purpose of Development Plan Permit is to establish consistency with the General Plan and protect the integrity and character of the residential and commercial areas of the city. The process ensures that new development yields a pleasant living environment and attracts the interest of residents and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design.
The original tentative tract map was approved prior to the adoption of Ordinance No . 1086 in November 2014. Ordinance No. 1086 revised the minimum lot size required under the Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2 ) zoning designation from 15,000 square feet to 18,000 square feet.
Currently, six of the nine lots do not meet the current minimum lot size for the R-L-2 zoning district; however, it was determined that because the original subdivider submitted their project well. before the adoption of Ordinance No. 1086, they would not be subject to the revised lot sizes. The current lot sizes range from 15,462 to 18,243 square feet for an overall project density of 1.94 units per acre . The approved and recorded tract map meets the lot size requirements under the previous development code.
The following table compares the subdivision with the City's Development Code standards in the proposed Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2 ) zoning designation:
Development Development Standards Proposed Meets
Feature Requirements
Parcel Width Minimum 90 ft. Minimum 108 ft. Yes
Parcel Depth Minimum 100 ft. Minimum 130 ft. Yes
Lot Size Minimum 18,000 sq. ft. Minimum 15,462 sq. ft. Yes, legal nonconforming
Maximum Density 2 dwelling units per acre 1.94 units per acre Yes maximum Minimum Front 25 ft. 25 ft. Yes Setback
Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-14
DATE: March 23 1 2023 EA22-0018 1 PDP22-00041 STN22-0001 Page 6 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
Minimum Side 10 ft. 10 ft . Yes Setback
Minimum Street 15 ft . 15 ft . Side Setback
Minimum Rear 25 ft. 25 ft. Yes Setback
Maximum Lot 30%* · 29.9%* Average Yes Coverage
Maximum Height 20 ft I One Story (chimneys 16.2 ft I One Story Yes excluded) Off-street Parking Two-Car Garage Three-Car Garage Yes
* Pursuant to RMMC Section 17 .08 .020 , the third car space, not to exceed 240 square feet, shall not be included in the calculation of building lot coverage so long as that area is being maintained as a three- car garage.
As set forth in the above analysis, the proposed project is in conformance with the Rancho Mirage General Plan and the Section 30 Master Circulation Plan and Design Guidelines.
Site Plan and Project Design
The applicant is proposing mid-century modern architectural designs inspired by minimalism and sculptural works for their development plan . The preliminary development plan proposes three main housing schemes: Scheme "H", Scheme "L" and Scheme "V" to be distributed evenly among the nine lots with three lots per scheme . All homes will have a three-car front loading garage, with the exception of Lot 12 (Scheme V2), which has a two-car front loading garage and a one-car side loading garage .
Each home consists of a large open living entertainment space focused on the indoor/outdoor connection, a large independent master suite, three guest bedrooms in various layouts , and media/office spaces.
Detached casitas at 368 square feet in size have been proposed for Lots 11, 13, 14 , and 17.
The detached casitas are no taller than 11 '-6'' from finished grade . 10'-6" tall pool cabanas have been proposed for Lots 10 and 12 . As proposed, the accessory structures meetthe required minimum setbacks and height requirements.
The table below shows the phasing schedule, scheme type, and square footages proposed for each lot:
Phase Lot Number Scheme House Casita Garage
Lot 11 Scheme L 1 4,293 sq. ft. 368 sq . ft. 626 sq. ft . 1 Lot 17 Scheme V3 4,372 sq. ft. 368 sq. ft. 716 sq. ft .
Lot 18 Scheme H3 5,000 sq. ft. n/a 688 sq. ft.
Lot 12 Scheme V2 4,119 SQ. ft. n/a 751 SQ. ft .
2 Lot 13 Scheme L2 4,070 sq. ft. 368 sq . ft . 642 SQ. ft.
Lot 16 Scheme H2 5 ,000 SQ. ft. n/a 688 sa. ft.
3 Lot 10 Scheme V1 4,256 sa. ft. n/a 744 SQ. ft.
Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-15
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 7 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
Lot 14 Scheme L3 4,293 s . ft. 368 s . ft.
Lot 15 Scheme H1 5,448 s . ft. n/a
Colors and Materials
The exterior elevations are geometric in nature, and feature segmentations of stone, stucco, and glass. The exterior finish will be cement plaster with a light sand texture. The color palette chosen include neutral shades of greys, whites, and beiges. Window and slider frames can be in either clear or dark bronze anodized aluminum. Entry door paint colors include various shades of grey and dark bronze. Each scheme will have distinct architectural accents, such as limestone wall veneer, fixed glass over stucco, and painted metal louvers . The colors and materials palettes are not limited to specific schemes, and the developer or buyer can select the colors and finishes, allowing for customization throughout the development.
Access and Circulation
The residential subdivision will be gated, similarly to other residential developments in the vicinity. Access to the proposed parcels will be provided by the 37-foot-wide, 605-foot-long private street (Common Lots D and L) off Ginger Rogers Road, a public street. A second access point is provided to the southern portion of the project area with access to Via Florencia. Typical public streets in Section 30 are classified under the City's General Plan as local streets. Local streets consist of two lanes with a typical right-of-way width of 60 feet. The private street will be maintained by the future Homeowners' Association.
Grading & Drainage
Pad elevations and drainage patterns were established with the approval of Tentative Tract Map 35089. All proposed single-family lots will drain into the on-site street, then flow to collect in the combination inlets, and directed to the retention basin system .
The project site is rectangular shaped (elongated in the north-south direction) and is relatively flat -lying, with drainage tending from a north to southwest. The elevation ranges from 320 feet to 317 feet with the bottom of the retention basin (Common Lot I) being 312 feet. The landscaped retention basin will be open without fencing and appear as a visual extension of the parkway along Via Florencia. The perimeter subdivision wall is located at the back of the retention basin.
Landscaping
Entry, Landscaping, and Walls
The project's entry design and parkway landscaping off Ginger Roger Road and Via Florencia were established with the approval of Tentative Tract Map 35089 . The common area landscape plan and entry were previously amended in 2018, 2021, and 2022 to update the planting palette and materials under Minor Modification Case No. MOD18012 . The entry points off Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia feature variegated grey interlocking stone pavers, white vertical metal fence post vehicular gates, and pedestrian gates . The residential subdivision is enclosed by six-foot-tall perimeter walls painted in Dunn Edwards DE340 "Whisper White ." The parkway features a desert-appropriate landscape palette and a typical six-foot wide "Yosemite Brown" colored concrete meandering sidewalk in accordance with the Design Guidelines. Common area landscaping includes Mulga trees and Date palms, along with various Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-16
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 8 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
accent shrubs, such as pink muhly grass and agave, for color . Groundcover will consist of crushed rock and Del Rio pebble installed to a minimum depth of 3 inches. The project has been designed to comply with the City's landscape standards and the Section 30 Design Guidelines for landscaping and parkway improvements .
Front Yard Typicals
As a part of this development plan submittal, front yard typicals for the residential units are provided. The front landscapes feature lineal planting arrangements related to the project's architectural theme and feature desert-appropriate plantings. Canopy trees, such as the Mulga, Yellow Oleander, Palo Verde trees are proposed along with varying palm tree species. The plant palette remains consistent throughout the development with a varied selection of desert- appropriate plantings to soften the hardscape . The project meets the minimum landscaping mix required by the city's landscape development standards. Concrete driveways and other paved areas will be a natural sand finish to compliment the development.
Street Name Change (RMMC Chapter 17 .58)
When street renaming is initiated, Municipal Code Section 17 .58.030 requires that a petition shall be completed with signatures of the property owners or tenants representing at least seventy-five percent of the properties located along the road segment to be renamed. In this case, Bellavia Court South is a privat!3 cul-de-sac in a nine lot residential subdivision under a single ownership. The subject property is currently being improved upon. The street name change will not affect existing residences and properties outside of the residential subdivision.
Municipal Code Section 17 .58.060 states that a street may be renamed only when the following findings are made :
1. The proposed street name change is consistent with the General Plan and in compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 12.06 Street Name Standards; and,
2. The proposed street name change would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City .
Section 12.06 .060 of the Municipal Code requires that a street name is not a duplication and is easy to read, pronounce, and spell. The street name shall also reflect its characteristics, classification, and function . The name "Via Linea" in staffs opinion meets all the aforementioned criteria of the Municipal Code . In addition, the standards require that the street name shall be related to any of the following criteria: a desert theme, names of historical significance, or a stated development theme. "Via" a commonly used as a street prefix and was selected for consistency with other street names in the vicinity , such as Via Josefina and Via Florencia. "Linea" is a Latin word meaning "line" or "stripe," and is reminiscent of the proposed development's mid-century modern design aesthetic.
ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE
As part of the project review, staff sent notices to the Public Works Department, Riverside County Fire Marshal's Office, and all other responsible agencies regarding the proposed project on December 16, 2022. In addition, the street name change request was routed to the United States Postal Service (USPS) and Riverside Sheriffs Department Master Street Address Guide Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-17
DATE: March 23 1 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 9 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
(MSAG) on January 9, 2023 . Both agencies noted support for the "Via Linea" street name. The Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) were routed to the City Attorney's Office for review and approval pursuant to the original tract map's conditions of approval on December 22, 2022. The City Attorney's Office approved the CC&Rs on February 6, 2023.
Any received comments have been incorporated into this report and the Conditions of Approval.
Any correspondence received after the distribution of this report will be presented to the Planning Commissioners during the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The previously approved project (Tentative Tract Map No. 35089 and Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP07004) for an eighteen-lot single-family residential subdivision and a development plan was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA070003, the City prepared and filed an Initial Study and a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project.
A Notice of Availability was filed and posted with the Riverside County Clerk on February 25, 2008 . On September 4, 2008, the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted, and the tentative map and development plan permit applications approved. A Notice of Determination was filed with the Riverside County Clerk on October 16, 2008.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) provides that when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record , that there are no new significant environmental effects due to a change in the project or circumstances, and there is no new information of substantial importance as identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). The proposed project is a request to construct nine single-family residences on the southern half of Tract No . 35089 between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia. The project consists of three house concepts and range in size from 4,870 to 5,688 square feet. With respect to the proposed project, the revisions from the previously approved development plan application are only minor technical changes that do not result in any new significant environmental effect(s). Such minoP changes include the landscape planting palette, site and floor plans, color and material schemes, and architecture style of the residences. The current request does not propose to amend the project boundaries, uses, or development intensities of the original approval. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the City analyzed whether the revisions would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in severity of previously identified impacts . Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0018 and the City's analysis, no subsequent EIR, supplemental EIR, or subsequent mitigation negative declaration is required . Moreover, street name changes are exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3) because the changing of street names has no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment. No further environmental review is required.
Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-18
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 10 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
NOTICING REQUIREMENT
Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Section 17. 74.020, Hearing and notice, requires that all property owners, as shown on the county's latest equalized assessment roll, within a 1,000-foot radius of the boundaries of the subject parcel(s) be notified of matters requiring a public hearing . If the number of property owners to whom the notice would be mailed to is less than 25, then the mailing radius is required to be increased to 1,000 feet as measured from the exterior boundaries of the subject parcel.
On March 8, 2023, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the parcel boundary and posted at the City's designated community posting sites pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 17 . 74 of the Municipal Code. Notification of the public hearing was published in The Desert Sun on March 12, 2023. Any information addressed to the Planning Commission, but received after completion of this final report, will be distributed at the public hearing. No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report .
Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-19
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22 -0004, STN22-0001 Page 11 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0004
I. GENERAL
1. This approval shall be effective for two (2) years from the date of City Council approval.
A final development plan permit shall be obtained within this specific time period , or the preliminary development plan permit shall become null and void unless the expiration date for the project is extended as provided by Rancho Mirage Municipal Code (RMMC) Section 17.42.130.
2 . The applicant shall execute a written acknowledgment to the Planning Division stating acceptance of and compliance with all of the Conditions of Approval for this Project and all associated cases, and that the plans submitted are in compliance with the Conditions of Approval. No modifications shall be made to said plans without written approval from the appropriate decision-making body .
3. The Conditions of Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions . Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1 }, these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions . You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications , reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a}, has begun.
4 . The development of the subject property shall conform substantially with the approved exhibits contained in Case No. EA22-0018 and PDP22-0004 and all associated cases on file in the Planning Division . This includes all dimensional and size specifications , landscaping, hardscape, design treatments (including color and materials}, and the locations of buildings, structures, and plant materials as shown in the exhibit booklet approved with the development plan.
5. Prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant shall acknowledge that the approved project and any or all proposed modifications to the approved project shall be completed in accordance with applicable City Ordinances, Guidelines, and other requirements in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
6. The mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration based on Environmental Case No. EA070003 are hereby incorporated as · Conditions of Approval. The property owner shall be responsible for implementing the mitigation measures contained within the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration, as necessary. ·
7. All green waste shall be disposed of at a permitted composting facility . The applicant shall undertake or cause to be undertaken such action or actions as are necessary to permit and/or otherwise accommodate the implementation of recycling services. Such action or actions may include, but are not limited to: designating and providing adequate area at Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-20
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 12 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
II.
convenient locations with appropriate access for the placement of dumpsters and/or bin sets ; constructing permanent enclosures that meet all requirements of the Code of the City of Rancho Mirage for each dumpster and/or bin set; providing for the security of each dumpster to discourage scavenging, and ; providing adequate indoor area at convenient locations for the collection and short-term storage of recyclables . The applicant shall submit a "Recycling Program" that has been reviewed by an agent of the City, which, at a minimum, explains, states or otherwise defines : (1) recyclables generated by type; (2) estimate by pounds for each recyclable generated; (3) number of dumpsters and/or plastic bin sets (one set equals three "baskets ") needed to accommodate estimated recyclables ; (4) location of each dumpster (may be identified on a map attached as an exhibit); (5) method of collection such as curbside at each residential unit or at rear of property by dumpster, etc.; and (6) pick -up schedule for recyclables . The applicant shall provide other such information as may be necessitated by the development proposal.
8 . Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1170, all gated communities of two or more residential units shall install a Knox entry system, consistent with any emergency access policy, for use by the Sheriff's Department. The City Manager or their designee shall implement the requirement and enforcement of this Condition of Approval. 9 . All water features shall be maintained in compliance with Ordinance No. 844. Any water features and fountains shall be equipped with an aerometer so that the spray can be adjusted for wind speed .
PLANNING
10. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIRED
A Final Development Plan (FOP) shall be required prior to issuance of any grading or building permits . The Final Development Plan (FOP) shall include a complete set of Building Construction Plans, Final Lighting Plans (including cut-sheets with Photometric Plan), Precise Grading Plan, Wall Plans, Final Landscaping and Irrigation Plans, a written response to the project Conditions of Approval, and any other requirements as listed in the Final Development Plan application .
11. The Director shall consider the Final Development Plan Permit application. The Director may approve a Final Development Plan permit if it substantially conforms to the Prelminary Development Plan and associated Conditions of Approval. 12 . The approved Preliminary Development Plan may be modified only with City approval in a manner pursuant to RMMC Section 17.68.080 Changes to an approved project.
13. The project shall be completed in accordance with the ordinances, requirements, guidelines, and other criteria in effect at the time of construction .
14. The development of the premises shall conform to all development standards pursuant to RMMC Chapter 17.20.
15. Landscaping, Wall, and Grading Plans shall demonstrate that all electrical transformers, Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-21
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22 -0001 Page 13 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
utility pads, cable TV and phone boxes , and similar utility fixtures will be screened, pursuant to RMMC Chapter 17.20 and/or installed underground if required.
16. On lots abutting or across from each other, for which the same floor plan is proposed, different front elevations and color schemes must be constructed.
17. Landscaping. The plans shall be submitted as a Landscape Documentation Package in accord _ance with Ordinance No. 990, and as amended by Ordinance 1101 . Such Plan(s) shall be consistent with the Preliminary Landscape Plan, and the applicant shall provide evidence that the landscape plan has been reviewed and approved by the Riverside County Office of the Agricultural Commissioner and the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) prior to requesting a final inspection. The final landscaping and irrigation plans shall incorporate the use of Evapotranspiration (ET) irrigation "smart" controllers which shall include automatic water scheduling, rain, and temperature sensors . Prior to a final inspection, the landscape contractor shall verify in writing with Planning staff that controllers have been installed, are correctly programmed, and operate with these features. More information on smart controllers can be found at www .irrigation.com .
A. The project landscape architect shall submit written verification that the landscaping and irrigation has been installed per the approved plans.
B. Vegetation with spikes that may be harmful to pedestrians shall be a minimum of three (3) feet away from walkways.
C . Parkway and retention basin landscaping shall be installed prior to Final Map bonds being released.
D. The Planning Division reserves the right to request additional landscaping upon final inspection if it is determined that areas are devoid of plant or ground cover material, or the execution of the landscaping plan does not comply with the purpose and intent of the Section 30 Design Guidelines.
E . Landscaping shall be designed to endure blowsand conditions. 18 . Walls. Where perimeter walls are shown on the development plan they shall be designed with aesthetic relief and be of high-quality architectural design to compliment adjacent developments. In accordance with the Community Design Elements, the landscaped parkway and perimeter wall along all property lines shall be aesthetically enriched and subject to approval of Planning staff, with Architectural Review Board review as deemed necessary . All top of wall elevations and adjacent finish grade elevations for the project perimeter and entry walls shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division and City Engineer. The applicant shall contact the adjacent property owners if grading outside the subdivision boundaries is required for construction of the perimeter walls. This shall be accomplished prior to issuance of any permit.
19. Lighting . All exterior lighting shall be shown on the Final Development Plan and shall be low-level directed lighting, energy-efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are confined within the boundaries of the subject site and shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public right of way . Lighting shall not blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the building and shall be subject to review Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-22
DATE: March 23 1 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 14 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
Ill.
and approval by the Planning Division. Light fixtures shall be architecturally compatible to the overall design of the project.
PUBLIC WORKS
20. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall be required to submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a licensed civil engineer to the City Engineer for plan check and approval. The grading and drainage plan shall be consistent with any and all conditions of approval associated with any applicable subdivision map and any . Development Permit entitlements issued for the subject project by the City or any other responsible public agency. The grading and drainage plan shall conform to all city policies, standards, and regulations applicable to the project. In addition, if the project involves grading and drainage issues related to Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) facilities, written evidence of the District's approval shall be included with the submittal required by the City of Rancho Mirage . Additional plans or materials may be required at the discretion of the Engineering Division. Release of Building Permit(s) will be contingent upon proof that the site has been properly graded pursuant to an approved plan. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall schedule and conduct a pre-construction meeting with the City Public Works Inspector at the job site.
21. LOCAL AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (LAQMP)
The applicant shall prepare a Local Air Quality Management Plan (LAQMP) pursuant to Ordinance No. 855, Municipal Code Chapter 7.01. Said LAQMP shall detail the project's potential impacts upon the air quality of the area and any necessary mitigation measures and shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of the Grading Permit. For ease of preparing a LAQMP, the applicant may contact the Public Works Department regarding use of the LAQMP worksheet.
22. PAD CERTIFICATION
Prior to release of Building Permits, a Pad Certification submitted from a Licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer, attesting to the elevation matching the rough grade pad elevation shall be submitted to validate the rough grading completion . Building pad shall be certified by the licensed design engineer or a licensed land surveyor to within 0.1 O of a foot above or below the approved pad elevation indicated on the approved grading plan.
23. COMPACTION REPORT
Prior to the · release of Building Permits, the lot(s) for the building(s) shall have a compaction report submitted from a Geotechnical Engineer attesting to the buildable pad being compacted at least 90% of maximum relative density . If any over-excavation, or slopes steeper than 2:1, are needed for the building pad, a Geotechnical Engineer shall submit a document attesting to the acceptability of this non-standard earthwork in accordance with the recommendations of the preliminary soil report.
24. BLOWSAND MITIGATION PLAN
(For Section 30 and North of Ramon Only) Since this project is located in an area that is subject to occasional high winds and migrating sand, the subdivider shall be required Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-23
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 15 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
to submit a blowsand mitigation plan prepared by a licensed civil engineer to the City Engineer for plan check and approval. The blowsand mitigation plan shall identify the specific measures and describe the specific procedures that will be implemented to adequately mitigate blowsand impacts on all of the project's on-site and off-site improvements . All improvements for blowsand protection shall be depicted on the project's gr~ding and drainage plan. In addition, all marketing materials and CC&Rs shall identify that the project is located within a blowsand area.
25. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REQUIRED
In accordance with the RMMC Chapter 12 .16, all electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television and similar service wires located on or adjacent to the project site shall, at all discretion of the City Engineer, be installed underground.
26.AS-BUILT PLANS
A complete set of "As-Built" Grading, Sewer, Water, Landscaping, Street, Storm Drain, and all other required improvement plans shall be submitted by the engineer of record for review and approval prior to occupancy .
27. SECURITY
In accordance with the request of the Rancho Mirage Police Chief, the site shall be fenced and gated for security purposes. Screening material shall be placed on the fence to help block blowsand and to block views through the fence. If necessary, the applicant shall provide a state licensed private security officer during the time construction workers are not onsite.
28. CVWD LETTER
Prior to occupancy, if applicable, a letter from Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) shall be submitted stating that all the district fees have been paid and all requirements have been met for development.
IV. CITY ATTORNEY
Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the following conditions shall be satisfied:
29. INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval. The City shall notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding of which the City has written notice, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
30 . REIMBURSEMENTS
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may , Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-24
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 16 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of the action , but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this Condition .
31. IMPROVEMENT SURETY
Pursuant to Chapter 15 .64.280 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, all public improvements proposed with the Development Plan submittal, or required by the adopted approval Conditions, shall be guaranteed by cash bonds, letters of credit, or other legal instruments acceptable to the City Attorney and City Council.
32. RELEASE OF PLANS
Written authorization must be obtained from any certified , licensed, or registered professional who signed the original building plans authorizing the plans to be made available by the City to all subsequent owners upon request (if on file with the City at the time of the request) for use by any subsequent owners solely for the construction, maintenance, operation , and use of the subject building(s) at the Project Site .
33. NOTICE TO CITY UPON DEFAULT, FORECLOSURE OR BANKRUPTCY In the event that the applicant receives a notice of default from any lender in connection with funds loaned to the applicant for the proposed development, or that any security instrument given by the applicant to any lender is foreclosed upon whether through a trustee's sale or otherwise, or that the applicant files a petition for bankruptcy, the applicant shall immediately notify the City of such notice of default, foreclosure sale, and/or filing of the bankruptcy petition , as the case may be. 34 . DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS (CC&RS) The subdivider shall submit to the City a Declaration of Covenants , Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) which shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney that the entire project will be developed and maintained in accordance with the intent and purpose of the approval. The approved documents shall be recorded concurrently.
35. The applicant shall submit documents for recordation which clearly prohibit installation of _ improvements in the common area by individual homeowner or documents which allow and govern installation of such improvements within the identified common areas. The documents shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney . 36 . The CC&Rs shall be submitted to the City for review and shall contain provisions for a Homeowners' Association, with the unqualified right to assess owners of individual units for reasonable maintenance costs to common · areas and improvements. The Homeowners' Association shall have the right to lien units of the owners who default in the payment of any assessment so provided . Any deed of trust recorded prior to said CC&Rs shall be subordinated to the CC&Rs. Any lien imposed shall not be superior to any lien for property taxes or government assessments . The CC&Rs will be clearly marked to identify those sections addressing the Conditions of Approval.
37.AII conditions , covenants, and restrictions described herein shall be covenants running with the land, and shall, in any event, and without regard to technical classification or designation, legal or otherwise, be, to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity , Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-25
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 17 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
V.
VI.
binding for the benefit and the favor of, and enforceable by [the HOA], and its successors and assigns, and the City of Rancho Mirage, and its successors and assigns . The City shall be a beneficiary of these specific conditions, covenants and restrictions and shall have the right to enforce them in whole or in part; however, the City shall have no obligation to do so. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed by the City Attorney for compliance with this section.
38. The CC&Rs and tract marketing materials shall identify that the project site is located in an area of high winds and blowing dust.
39 . The CC&Rs shall require the Homeowners' Association and property owners to comply with the Section 30 Design Guidelines.
CONTRACT SPECIALIST
Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the following condition shall be satisfied:
40 . MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS
The current and future property owner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining in compliance with all City standards for the same, the on-site and off-site landscaping and integrated architectural features required by this entitlement; all perimeter landscaping shall be maintained in a first-class condition. Landscape maintenance shall consist of regular watering mowing, pruning, fertilizing, clearing of debris and weeds, and the removal and replacement of irrigation systems, in compliance with all relevant and applicable provisions of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code. Integrated architectural features must be kept in a manner which maintains the desirability of the immediate area and neighboring areas and respects the harmonious relationship with existing and adjoining developments . Due regard for preservation of each feature and its intended irrigation with surrounding landscaping, buildings, structures, screening, and signs is required. All features must be maintained in a manner commonly accepted by professionals who are experts in the care and preservation of each particular type of feature. A covenant to assure continued maintenance of on-site and off-site required landscaping and integrated architectural features by the current and future property owners or other liable entity, consistent with the terms and provisions of this condition of approval, shall be prepared in a format approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder against all parcels created with this subdivision and any subsequent amendments thereto .
FIRE MARSHAL
41. The proposed project may have a cumulative adverse impact of the Fire Department's ability to provide an acceptable level of service . These impacts include an increased number of emergency and public service calls due to the increased presence of structures, traffic, and population. The project proponents/developers will be expected to provide for a proportional mitigation to these impacts via capital improvements and/or impact fees .
42. Fire Department emergency vehicle apparatus access road locations and design shall be Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-26
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 18 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
in accordance with the California Fire Code, City of Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, and Riverside County Fire Department Standards. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to building permit issuance .
43. Fire Department water system(s) for fire protection shall be in accordance with the California Fire Code, City of Rancho Mirage Municipal and Riverside County Fire Department Standards. Plans must be submitted to the Fire D~partment for review and approval prior to building permit issuance.
44 . Prior to Building Permit issuance, the required water system, including all fire hydrant(s), shall be installed, and accepted by the appropriate water agency and the County Fire Department prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot. Contact the Fire Department to inspect the required fire flow, street signs, all weather surfaces, and all access and/or secondary access . Approved water plans must be at the job site.
Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-27
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 19 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
FINDINGS
Preliminary Development Plan Case No . PDP22-0004
Pursuant to RMMC Section 17.42.060 Findings and decision, a development plan permit may be approved by the applicable review authority only if all of the following findings are made :
A The proposed development is: 1) Allowed within the respective zoning district; 2) Generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of this title that are necessary to carry out the purpose and requirements of the respective zoning district, including prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines; and 3) Consistent with the general plan and specific plan. The proposed use is one permitted within the subject zoning district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The current General Plan and zoning designation for the Project Site is Very Low Density Residential (R-L-2). The R-L-2 zoning district identifies areas appropriate for large lot single-family uses. The allowable maximum density is two dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed use is a single-family residential development with nine lots and a density of 1.94 units per acre. The tentative tract map was approved prior to the passing of Ordinance No. 1086, which comprised of a city-initiated Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) adopted on November 6, 2014. Said Ordinance changed the minimum lot size required under the Very Low Density Residential (R-L-2) zoning designation from 15,000 square feet to 18,000 square feet.
The City Engineer approved a Lot Line Adjustment (LLA 22-04) on January 12, 2023, for Lots 15 and 16 to reduce the number of lots that do not meet the current minimum lot size from seven to six lots. The current lot sizes range from 15,462 to 18,243 square feet with the average lot size of 17,046 square feet. Six of the nine lots in the Project Site do not meet the current minimum lot size for the R-L-2 zoning district; however, it was determined that because the original subdivider submitted their project well before the city-initiated ZTA was adopted, they would not be subject to the revised lot sizes. The approved tentative map meets the lot size requirements under the previous development code. The project, as conditioned, meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements for lot coverage, setbacks, height limitations, and landscaping as described in this report. As conditioned, the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Section 30 Guidelines.
B. The proposed project would produce a comprehensive development incorporating a more enhanced environment and architectural excellence (e.g ., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, increased amounts of landscaping and open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking facilities, etc.) than would normally be possible under more standard district development requirements, as conditioned. The applicant is proposing a modern mid-century architecture theme for the development, and the proposed floor plans and dimensions are consistent with the R-L-2 zoning district. Scheme "H" have been designed to take advantage of the westerly mountain views, so they have been placed further back in the lots with the private outdoor area located in the front.
The exterior elevations are geometric in nature, and feature segmentations of stone, Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-28
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 20 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
stucco, and glass. The color palette chosen include neutral shades of greys, whites, and beiges and inspired by the desert tones in nature. Each scheme will have distinct architectural accents, such as limestone wall veneer, fixed glass over stucco, and painted metal louvers. The colors and materials palettes are not limited to specific schemes, and the developer or buyer can select the colors and finishes, allowing for customization throughout the development. The landscape plan incorporates a desert appropriate planting palette and is in compliance with the Section 30 Design Guidelines.
C . The design, location, shape , size , operating characteristics , and the provision of public and emergency vehicle access and public services and utilities (e.g ., drainage, fire protection, sewers, water, etc.), would ensure that the proposed development would not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and the respective zoning district. The conditions for TTM35089, as imposed by the City Council, will ensure the on and off-site infrastructure improvements meet or exceed the City of Rancho Mirage requirements. Storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water, streets, and all utilities are available to the site. The subdivision was recorded in 2018 and have completed a majority of the subdivision improvements. In addition, the mitigation measures contained in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration based on Environmental Case No. EA070003 are required to be implemented .
D. The design, location, and proposed uses would be compatible with the character of existing development in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed use is one permitted within the subject zoning district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The current General Plan and zoning designation for the Project Site is Very Low Density Residential (R-L-2). The R~L-2 · zoning district identifies areas appropriate for large lot single-family uses. The allowable maximum density is two dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed use is a single-family residential development with nine lots and a density of 1.94 units per acre.· There are also similar gated residential subdivisions in the vicinity, such as the Echo development. The project, as conditioned, meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements for lot coverage, setbacks, height limitations, and landscaping as described in this report.
E. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of development being proposed, as conditioned. The project site is physically suitable for the type of low density residential development. The overall project density is 1.94 dwelling units per acre, which complies with the maximum density under the R-L-2 zoning district. In addition, the applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. No variances or exceptions are requested.
F. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and there would be no potential significant negative effects upon environmental quality and natural resources that would not be properly mitigated and monitored, unless findings are made in compliance with CEQA. The previously approved project (Tentative Tract Map No. 35089 and Preliminary Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-29
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 21 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
Development Plan Case No. PDP07004) for an eighteen-lot single-family residential subdivision and a development plan was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on Environmental Assessment Case No.
EA070003, the City prepared and filed an Initial Study and a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. A Notice of Availability was filed and posted with the Riverside County Clerk on February 25, 2008. On September 4, 2008, the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted, and the tentative map and development plan permit applications approved. A Notice of Determination was filed with the Riverside County Clerk on October 16, 2008. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) provides that when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that there are no new significant environmental effects due to a change in the project or circumstances, and there is no new information of substantial importance as identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). The proposed project is a request to construct nine single- family residences on the southern half of Tract No. 35089 between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia. The project consists of three house concepts and range in size from 4,870 fo 5,688 square feet. With respect to the proposed project, the revisions from the previously approved development plan application are only minor technical changes that do not result in any new significant environmental effect(s).
Such minor changes include the landscape planting palette, site and floor plans, color and material schemes, and architecture style of the residences. The current request does not propose to amend the project boundaries, uses, or development intensities of the original approval. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the City analyzed whether the revisions would result in new significant impacts or substantial increase in severity of previously. identified impacts. Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22- 0018 and the City's analysis, no subsequent EIR, supplemental EIR, or subsequent mitigation negative declaration is required. Moreover, the changing of street names has no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment and therefore, such an action is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). No further environmental review is required.
FINDINGS
Street Name Change Case No . STN22-0001
Pursuant to RMMC Sect ion 17 .58 .060 Findings and dec ision, street name changes may be approved by the app licab le rev iew authority on ly if a ll of the fol low ing findings are made:
1. The proposed street name change is consistent w ith the Genera l Plan and in comp li ance w ith Munic ipa l Code Chapter 12.06 (Street Name Standards). The proposed street name change complies with the standards found in Municipal Code Section 12.06.060 that there shall be no duplication of street names and that street names shall be based upon or shall relate to names relating to a stated development theme. "Linea" is a Latin word meaning "line" or "stripe," and is reminiscent of the proposed development's mid-century modern design aesthetic. "Via" a commonly used as a Plann ing Comm iss ion Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-30
DATE: March 23, 2023 EA22-0018, PDP22-0004, STN22-0001 Page 22 of 22 JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONT INUED:
street prefix and was selected for consistency with other street names in the vicinity, such as Via Josefina and Via Florencia.
2. The proposed street name change wi ll not be detrimenta l to the pub li c interest, health, safety, convenience, or we lfare of the City. The street name change is for a private street in a gated nine-lot residential subdivision. The property owner is the sole proprietor of the subdivision. In addition, the street name change request was routed to the United States Postal Service (USPS) and Riverside Sheriff's Department Master Street Address Guide (MSAG) on January 9, 2023. Both agencies noted their support for the "Via Linea" street name.
Planning Comm ission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM#
5-31
~ CITY OF RANCHO MI RAGE TS
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2023
City of Rancho Mirage
City Hall -Council Chambers
69 -825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
CALL TO ORDER-12:30 P.M.
12:30 P.M.
MINUTES
Roll Call: Doczi, Greenwood, Lockyer, Milander, O'Donnell, Patel, and Sanborn.
Doczi, Greenwood, Milander, O'Donnell, Patel, and Sanborn -Present Lockyer -Absent
Ben Torres, Planning Manager, informed the board that Board Member Lockyer will be resigning from the Architectural Review Board effective March ~, 2023 .
MOVED/SECONDED BY GREENWOOD/O'DONNELL TO EXCUSE BOARD MEMBER LOCKYER'S ABSENCE. MOTION CARRIED 6/0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES -January 23, 2023
MOVED/SECONDED BY GREENWOOD/MILANDER TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 23, 2023 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AS PRESENTED.
MOTION CARRIED 6/0.
ACTION ITEM
1. Review and recommend to the City Council the Architectural Review Board annual report for 2022.
Ben Torres, Planning Manager, presented the staff report.
Public comment: -None .
MOVED/SECONDED BY GREENWOOD/PATEL TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECEIVE AND FILE THE 2022 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD REPORT. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN AND MOTION CARRIED 6/0.
2/27 /23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 13
5-32
DISCUSSION ITEM
2. Environmental Assessment Case No.. EA22-0012, General Plan Zoning Map Amendment Case No. GPZMA22-0002, Specific Plan Amendment Case No. SPA22- 0002, Tentative Parcel Map Case No. TPM22-0004, Development Agreement Case No.
DA22-0003, and Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0001 -Desert Island Hotel. The Desert Island Specific Plan Amendment will occupy 17.2 acres within the existing Desert Island development. A General Plan/Zoning Map Amendment is to amend the underlying designation of Private Open Space (OS/PV) to Resort Hotel (Rs-H) for 10 .5 acres of the existing Desert Island golf course for the development of a new 42-key boutique hotel and 11 private hotel residences along with passive outdoor gathering areas, tennis, pool, cafe, and yoga amenities . A new golf training park and new maintenance building will be built to . replace the existing driving range and old maintenance building being displaced by the hotel project. Located south of Frank Sinatra Drive and west of Island Drive on a portion of the Desert Island golf course (APNs:688-040-001; 688-050-002; -005; 688-060-008; -023) Pilar Lopez, Senior Planner, presented the staff report .
Chair O'Donnell opened the meeting to board questions for staff.
Board Member Greenwood asked what the relationship with the HOA is? What is the oversight that Desert Island Homeowner's Association has and what review has happened? Ms . Lopez stated that the project has received HOA approval, which is on file with the Planning Division and the applicant and team have met with the residents of the community .
Board Member Greenwood commented on the roofing component of the two-story building and expressed his concerns . He asked for confirmation that the existing Clubhouse will not service or provided any function to the hotel.
Ms. Lopez stated that the applicant has expressed that clubhouse staff would be crossed trained .
Board Member Greenwood asked in what ways would the clubhouse staff assist the hotel functions .
Ms . Lopez deferred the operational question to the applicant.
Chair O'Donnell asked if any other board member had further questions for staff.
Board Member Doczi asked about the access gate and when it would be open .
Ms. Lopez explained the main gate would remain open during the hotel's operation.
Board Member Doczi, asked for an elaboration the hotel entrance, circulation, path of travel, and turnaround point.
Ms . Lopez deferred to the applicant.
Chair O'Donnell asked the applicant to make a presentation on the revised project. 2/27/23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 13
5-33
Paul Depalatis, the applicant's representative , further clarified the comments made earlier and deferred to the project architect regarding the architectural questions . Mr. Depalatis further explained the project components and their proposed location and the changes that had been made to the project with highlighted details .
James Myer, the project architect, answered the board members' questions and explained the design philosophy is for minimalistic architecture . The intent is to maximize the open space and landscaping he emphasized that the residences and hotel be densified to maximize the natural landscaping. He stated that they have not contracted a mechanical engineer but would internalize everything to try to have a minimal footprint.
Chair O'Donnell asked if any other board member had any other questions of the applicant? Board Member Doczi asked how the pool area's fencing would be proposed.
Mark Lenning, the project landscape architect, explained the design of the pool area .
Majna Dukie, Development Services Director, added that the project would have to comply with all safety codes for both the commercial and residential pools .
Chair O'Donnell asked if anyone else had questions for the applicant.
Board Member Greenwood commented that the site is a commercial development that would need to comply with ADA standards and asked for clarification on how these standards are being met.
Mr. Myers explained the ADA design and mechanical plan design .
Ms . Dukie added that if that is something that the board is concerned about, the board can direct staff to ensure that all mechanical equipment is screened with the final development plan if the project is approved . If there are changes that go outside of the approved boundaries, then either a minor modification or a major modification application would be required .
Mr. Myers addressed the mechanical concerns . He also explained the reasoning behind the vision and articulation of the project design . He discussed the different material types such as wood, stone, and color elements.
Board Member Greenwood asked about the operations, support functions, and programmatic functions of the hotel.
Mr. Myers explained the concept of the support functions.
Board Member Doczi asked applicant to explain the landscape areas between the Grand Aisle parking area and the hotel entrances.
Mr. Lenning, project landscape architect described his team's approach to the landscaping design .
Chair O 'Donnell asked the architect about the parking . He asked if Mr . Myers had tried working on different design overlay to move the Grand Aisle parking to a different location in order to create a pedestrian -oriented instead of vehicle-oriented design. 2/27/23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 13
5-34
Mr. Myers explained that the concept of the grand isle and it was meant to celebrate the concept.
Chair O'Donnell commented he is struggling that this could be a landscape court and layers of landscape elements and summarized his concerns regarding the drive aisle design.
Miguel Nelson, project applicant and owner, described the hotel's open space and how it enhances of the quality of this area .
Chair O'Donnell opened the meeting to board discussion.
Board Member Milander asked the is the next process for the project.
Ms. Lopez answered there are three options . Option 1 , the project can be recommended approval by the ARB as is and go to the Planning Commission, option 2 the project can be recommended approval by the ARB with conditions of approval that have to be met before the FOP is approved and then go to the Planning Commission with those conditions, or option 3, the project comes back to the ARB for further review .
Board Member Mi lander asked if the FOP would come in front of the board.
Ms . Lopez answered no, the FOP is approved at staff level.
Mr. Torres answered for clarification the FOP is the full construction submittal. Planning staff reviews it for conformance of the final approved plans and also final conditions of approval to confirm that all conditions are being responded to as well.
Board Member Doczi said that the project is seeking six entitlements: General Plan Zoning Map Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Tentative Parcel Map, Development Agreement Case, and Preliminary Development Plan, and asked for clarification on what the ARB was reviewing and approving .
Ms . Lopez asked if the board is hoping to move this forward but come back to review site plan and landscape plan .
Board Member Milander clarified that Board Member Doczi would like to approve the entitlements without approving the design of the project.
Ms . Lopez clarified that at this point what is being approved by the ARB is the SpecifiG Plan Amendmentand the Preliminary Development Plan .
Board Member Milander summarized his comments and questions . He feels that they learned nothing new from the previous meeting exceptfor the location of the mechanical units.
Chair O'Donnell clarified the board and Planning Commission's role. He stated that project can stand on its own and the details would be worked out.
Board Milander questioned the functions that are missing to fully analyze the project.
Vice Chair Patel concurred with Chair O'Donnell.
2/27/23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 13
5-35
Board Member Doczi added his comments and questions .
Board Member Milander added his comments and questions .
Chair O'Donnell asked if Doczi can put his comments into a motion.
Ms. Lopez asked board members to list out the concerns for the applicant can respond to the questions and comments.
Board Milander stated that the board had previously provided a list of concerns to be addressed and they weren't addressed.
Ms . Lopez asked if give the board would like the applicant to revisit the list and provided a revised project.
Board Member Greenwood commend the applicant for what they are doing there, but noted that this project was headed to a continuance . He stated that there is a lot that still needs to be determined from a program standpoint, the construction methodology has to be a blend and take into account the consistency . This type of methodology is taking precedence over trying to blend in a mixing of additional architecture . He expressed interest in seeing a restudy of the two-story building of bring it closer to the design of the one-story residence units . He said he would be supportive of a continuance of the project and a restudy of elements of that nature.
Public comment: -None .
Chair O'Donnell asked Board Member Greenwood to state a motion.
Board Member Milander asked the question of continuance versus just denying the project.
Chair O'Donnell confirmed that we are asking for a restudy.
Board Member Greenwood concurred with asking for a restudy.
Board Member Greenwood mentioned he would like to see a continuance of the project.
Chair O'Donnell add that it is a consensus that the board would restudy the project.
MOVED/SECONDED BY GREENWOOD/PATEL TO RECOMMEND THAT THE PROJECT BE
CONTINUED TO A DATE TO BE DETERMINED BY STAFF AND THE APPLICANT TO RESTUDY BASED ON THE BOARD COMMENTS. MOTION CARRIED 5/1 3 . Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22 -0018, Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0004, and Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 -Linea. Applicant:
Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects for Linea Rancho Mirage, LLC . Consideration to construct 9 single-family residences on 4.63 acres of vacant land on the southern half of Tract Map No . 35089 between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia . The project consists of 3 house concepts and range in size from 4 ,870 to 5 ,688 square feet. This project includes a request to change the current street name of Bellavia Court South to Via Linea . (APNs :
685-351-001 through -016).
Note: Board Member Greenwood recused himself from Discussion Item 3. 2/27 /23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 13
5-36
Joy Tsai, Senior Planner, presented the staff report .
Chair O'Donnell opened the meeting to board questions for staff.
Board Member Milander inquired about how the subdivision and grading plans were approved and completed without Architectural Review Board review .
Ms. Tsai clarified the project site's history : The tentative tract map was approved in 2008 and the map was extended throughout the years through automatic time extensions from the state.
The final map was recorded in 2018. She further stated that subdivision improvements are required as a part of the subdivision process .
Board Member Milander asked why the residential rear yards are not a part of the project and as a part of their review.
Ms . Tsai explained that as the project is a small tract home development, landscape plans for the rear yard are not required and that only the front yard landscape plans are required .
Board Member Milander asked whether the street name change will affect both private streets in the subdivision or not.
Ms. Tsai responded that the street name change request is only applicable for the south side of the Ginger Rogers Road and that the north and south half of the subdivision have different property owners . The project property owner requested to change the private street name in · order to differentiate their project.
Vice Chair Patel commented that the project is well thought off and very articulated architecture as well as the layout of the plans over simple architecture that works very well.
Board Member Sanborn inquired about the reason why the project is being presented to the ARB if they are only proposing single -family residences.
Mr. Torres replied that the project is being presented to the ARB because the applicant submitted a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) application for home designs for the subdivision. If the applicant were to submit applications for single-family residences under Senate Bill 9 (SB 9), then the residences would be reviewed at the ministerial level.
Chair O'Donnell asked about the side-loading garages and pointed out that there is only one lot that proposed a side-loading garage. He asked staff to confirm whether the City's zoning ordinance allows a reduction of front yard setback for a side -loading garage.
Ms. Tsai answered in the affirmative to Chair O'Donnell's question.
Chair O'Donnell asked the applicant to make a quick presentation .
Andrew Adler, applicant, presented the proposed project and addressed the board members' questions.
Chair O'Donnell asked if any other board member had questions for the applicant. 2/27/23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 13
5-37
Board Member Milander expressed his concern about water usage.
Mr. Adler elaborated the landscape design intent for the project and the CC&R's that will be in place.
Board Member Sanborn asked about placement of the solar panels and vents.
Mr. Adler answered member Sanborn's questions and concerns.
Chair O'Donnell expressed concerns about prevailing wind and solar orientation and the layout of the homes. He recommended that the applicant re-study the floor plans of the homes based on prevailing wind and solar orientation. He pointed out that this community will be a community with a garage-dominate fa9ade . He asked if there was a way to allow reductions in setbacks with a side-loading garage to improve the community's curb appeal.
Mr. Torres replied that side-loading garages may be set back a minimum of fifteen feet from the front property line and that the building setback line for the front is twenty -five feet for the Very Low Density Residential (R-L-2) zoning district.
Chair O'Donnell asked if a minor modification or variance could help reduce the building setback requirement another twenty five percent.
Mr. Torres responded that the director may grant a minor variance, up to a maximum of ten percent of the standards being modified , if certain findings can be made .
Public comment: -None .
Board Member Milander added if it was possible to add provisions to prohibit live turf.
Mr. Torres added that municipal code permits no more than 10% of landscape to be water intensive uses for all development projects .
Ms. Tsai clarified that the City's landscape standards are already incorporated as a standard condition of approval for all projects and that the City's landscape standards provide that only ten percent of the total landscaped area (in addition to turfed area) is allowed to be non -drought tolerant species.
MOVED/SECONDED BY MILANDER/SANBORN TO RECOMMEND THE PROJECT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS PRESENTED. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN AND THE MOTION CARRIED 5/0 WITH BOARD MEMBER GREENWOOD RECUSED.
Note: Board took a five -minute break.
4. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0014, Development Agreement Case No.
DA22-0002, and Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP22-0002 -Eisenhower Medical Center Memory Care, Child Care, and Administration Building. Applicant: Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects for Eisenhower Health. Consideration to construct three single story buildings on 4 .31 acres. The buildings will consist of 19,890 square feet for a memory care center, 17,116 square feet for childcare center, and 37,724 for an administration office .
Located at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Wilshire Palm Drive. (APN: 682- 010-021 ).
2/27/23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 13
5-38
Ben Torres, Planning Manager, presented the staff report .
Note: Board Member Greenwood recused himself from Discussion Item 4.
Chair O'Donnell opened the meeting to board questions for staff.
Board Member Milander asked if staff could go over existing zoning, and what is being proposed to change .
Mr . Torres clarified they are not changing the zone . The zoning for this site is Public/Quasi - Public zone.
Board Member Mi lander asked, what is the height of the parking lot lighting? Mr. Torres explained that the height of the light poles is 16 feet 6 inches excluding the base .
Board Member Sanborn inquired if the applicant had any meeting with the neighboring community to over the site plan development and landscape .
Mr. Torres mentioned that the applicant can respond to that question .
Chair O'Donnell questioned the day care vehicular traffic and intensity .
Mr . Torres explained that Mr. Ali Tourkaman, Eisenhower representative can better explain the hospitals staff schedule .
Chair O'Donnell asked the applicant to make a quick presentation.
Nicole Williams, project representative addressed the Board Members traffic questions and concerns.
Mr. Tourkaman elaborated on Eisenhower staff schedules.
Chair O'Donnell asked about the day lighting sources.
Ms . Williams answered that they are providing daylight into multiple spaces .
Chair O'Donnell asked the applicant to make a quick presentation.
Vice Chair Patel , made a positive comment about the projects design.
Public comment: -None .
Board Member Mi lander expressed his concerns about the neighbors to the east and the lighting in the parking lot. He inquired if there was something that the applicant can do to improve the lighting for the neighbors to the east.
Mr . Torres answered Board Member Milander's questions . He added how staff will notify the neighbors making them aware of the project and giving them an opportunity to submit public comments or attend future public hearings .
2/27/23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 13
5-39
Chair O'Donnell ask Board Member Doczi for his opinion on the landscape edge. He also questioned if covered parking with downward lighting should be encouraged.
Board Member Doczi went through several areas of the projects as part of the discussion.
Mr. Tourkaman addressed the lighting and the noise concerns.
Chair O'Donnell asked if engineering had taken a look at this project and made any proposing changing the median so that someone can make a u turn .
Mr. Torres mentioned engineering made recommendations/comments and staff provided this to the applicant. At that time the applicant wanted to "!love forward with their own driveway approach.
Ms . Dukie clarified that shared drive would require a consent from the property owner.
Chair O'Donnell inquired about the vacant property on the west and if there have been plans to acquire that property .
Mr. Tourkaman confirmed that they looked into that property and the property is not available.
Board Member Sanborn added his comments and questions.
Board Member Milander summarized his concerns about the parking lot lighting and would like to make it a condition that it operate until 6 pm and then minimal low site lighting for non- operational hours.
MOVED/SECOND BY PATEL/SANDBORN TO RECOMMEND THE PROJECT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITH THE LIGHTING CONDITION. MOTION CARRIED 4/1 WITH BOAD MEMBER GREENWOOD RECUSED.
5. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA21-0002, General Plan Zoning Map Amendment Case No. GPZMA21-0001, Development Agreement Amendment Case No.
DA21-0002, and Major Modification Case No. MOD21-0004 -The Ritz-Carlton Phase II Expansion. Applicant: Kam Sang Company for Newage Rancho Mirage LLC/ Ritz Carlton.
Consideration to construct the Ritz Carlton residences consisting of 106 units ranging in size from 1 to 3 bedrooms, 23,840 square feet of event space, 6,273 square feet of restaurant , 5,510 square feet for amenities, a 381-space subterranean parking structure, and other recreational amenities on a 35.01-acre project site which includes the existing hotel. A General Plan/Zoning Map Amendment is also proposed to amend the Mountain Reserve (MR) designation for the projects Sky Mesa Recreational area to Resort Hotel (Rs-H). Located at 69800 Frank Sinatra Drive. (APNs: 689-330 -026; -028; -032; -034; 689-020-012; -0 14; 689- 331-001; -018).
Ben Torres, Planning Manager, presented the staff report.
MEMBER PATEL LEFT THE MEETING AT 3:25PM
Chair O'Donnell opened the meeting to board questions for staff. 2/27/23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 13
5-40
Board Member Milander inquired about the prior zoning of Sky Masa area .
Mr. Torres answered that a portion of the Sky Mesa area is currently zoned Mountain Reserve .
He mentioned in order for this area to allow restaurant and other uses they are proposing a change of zone to Resort Hotel.
Board Member Milander expressed his comments and concerns.
Ms . Dukie clarified that the current owners purchased the property a few years ago prior to that, the project had other ownership.
Board Member Milander inquired about the City's rules about the retaining walls and the max heights .
Mr. Torres, answered we typically take into consideration the height from the highest adjacent grade .
Ms . Dukie added that our standard municipal code maximum is 6 ft, unless proposed with a Preliminary Development Plan .
Board Member Sanborn asked if the project would be seen from Highway 111 .
Mr. Torres, answered that you shouldn't be able to see this from Highway 111. Overall, it is going to be a two story product but we have the existing hotel that will be more visible along Highway 111, the residence portion of the project will be at the back of property. · Ms . Dukie added that concern was a part of their initial design in our preliminary conversations, and they did pay attention to what would be visible from Highway 111 and that would be the Sky Mesa portion .
Board Member Greenwood asked if the applicant shared their goals for the development schedule .
Mr. Torres will defer that question to the applicant to answer.
Board Member Greenwood added his comments and questions.
Mr. Torres explained the project design and location where the services will be handled.
Board Member Milander inquired the grading numbers .
Mr. Torres referred the board to the Preliminary Grading Plan and asked the applicant to further elaborate .
Board Member Sanborn asked if there is a sheet that shows the retaining wall system.
Mr. Torres referred the board to the grading plan and exhibit sheet 15 -15 that provided the information.
Chair O'Donnell asked what interactions the applicant had with the Mirada. He also inquired what was previously proposed on the site .
2/27/23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 13
5-41
Mr. Torres explained that a project was proposed around 2007, but that project was never built.
Chair O'Donnell asked if this was a less intensive project then what was previously proposed .
Mr. Torres responded that the previous project prepared an Environmental Impact Report and for this project a Mitigated NegaUve Declaration has been prepared.
Ms. Dukie added the units counts might have been somewhat similar and the Sky Mesa portion is the one thing that is unique and new to this consideration .
Ch~ir O'Donnell asked the applicant to make a brief presentation.
Everardo Garcia, project Architect presented the proposed project and addressed the concerns brought up.
John Hicks, applicant representative presented and further elaborated on the project. He addressed and discussed the landscaping and retaining wall concerns.
Chair O'Donnell asked the applicant to provide their project presentation . He would like to see more on operations of exiting hotel. Will the hotel continue to allow the residents of Mirada to utilize some of the amenities of the hotel.
Mr. Hicks explained the operation and services of the hotel and how they will still continue have amenities available for the residents.
Board Member Milander expressed his comments and concerns about the retaining walls and the disturbance of the landscape.
Mr. Hicks answered that rock formation will remain intact. That is a primary feature, and everyone agrees to that. He explained concept of the geo wall retaining system.
Board Member Milander expressed his concerned about the noise of the mechanical units.
Mr. Hicks discussed the mechanical equipment.
Ms . Dukie added that the applicant had a noise study conducted as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project.
Mr. Torres confirmed that a noise study had been conducted and noise level were determined to be less then significant.
Board Member Mi lander asked if an Environmental Impact Report was prepared on the previous development.
Ms. Dukie confirmed that the previous project did a full EIR. For this project we worked off analysis done there and expanded to adjust to the project as well.
Board Member Milander asked if the lawn area will be grass.
Mr. Hicks responded it will be synthetic turf and perimeter landscaping will be desert themed. 2/27 /23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 13
5-42
Board Member Greenwood asked if the Sky Mesa restaurant will replace the Edge .
Mr. Hicks responded that both restaurants would remain operational.
Chair O'Donnell asked the applicant questions about the roofs and the designs .
Board Member Greenwood added to the roof discussion.
Board Member Milander asked about the ramping walkway to the Sky Mesa restaurant.
Mr. Hicks responded they have conducted an extensive grading plan for the project as a part of this submittal. He stated that they worked with a civil engineer that has been involved through the entire time.
Board Member Milander would like to see more information to be able to vote for approval. He mentioned his concerns about grading and would like visuals.
Chair O'Donnell, asked about vehicle circulation .
Mr. Hicks explained the concern about vehicle circulation.
Board Members Milander and Greenwood added questions about the vehicle circulation.
Board Member Milander asked staff if there a point in the project where story poles are installed.
Ms. Dukie added that is not a standard requirement that is asked for all applicants. She mentioned if it was something that the board would like to see, the applicant can respond to the request.
Board Member Greenwood added his comments and questions .
Board Member Milander added his comments and questions , Chair O'Donnell added his comments and questions.
Board Member Sanborn summarized his concerns regarding the hotel's landscape design .
Ms . Dukie clarified that the hotel requires a 50 ft setback due to the Resort Hotel zone and it is a greater setback then other zoning standards within the City.
Board Member Greenwood added his comments and questions.
Public comment: -None .
Chair O'Donnell add that it is a consensus that the board would like to see more information and asked for a motion. He directed staff to summarize the comments provided.
Mr. Torres summarized the boards comments:
2/27/23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 13
5-43
1. Provide renderings and line of sight exhibits from viewpoints along Highway 111 and from Mirada to the project.
2. Provide a construction section of the walkway within Sky Mesa .
3. Provide more details and construction information on the geo-mesh retaining walls .
4. · Provide more information on the Sky Mesa buildings, including mechanical equipment and how the building will be constructed into the mountain. 5 . Look into the landscaping to see if fewer plantings are possible and scale the landscape symbols.
6. Provide cuUfill information on the grading plans.
7. Install story polls on the property for buildings B-5, B-6, B-7, B-9, B-12, & B-14.
MOVED/SECONDED BY MILANDER/GREENWOOD TO RESTUDY THE PROJECT BASED ON THE BOARD COMMENTS. MOTION CARRIED 5/0
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to consider the Architectural Review Board adjourned the meeting at 4 :41 p.m.
Prepared by: Deanna Mendoza, Development Services Technician Date Approved by Architectural Review Board: 3/27/2023
2/27 /23 Approved Architectural Review Board Meeting Minutes Page 13 of 13
5-44
----··········································································--- ~ CITY OF RANCHO M1 RAGE NTe
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
THURSDAY, MARCH 23, 2023 -2:00 P.M.
City Hall -Council Chamber
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
CALL TO ORDER-2:00 P.M.
DRAFT MINUTES
a) Flag Salute: Led by Commissioner Chanter
b) Roll Call : Present: Agostini,.Bryant, Chanter, Grey
Absent: Maxwell
MOVED/SECONDED BY CHANTER/AGOSTINI TO EXCUSE CHAIR MAXWELL'S ABSENCE.
MOTION CARRIED 4/0.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS -
Vice Chair Grey commented that he wanted to make sure that the public understands the time and effort that goes into presenting for the commission. Vice Chair Grey commended staff and the Commissioners on their dedication, care, and hard work.
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS -None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES-March 9, 2023, Regular Meeting.
MOVED/SECONDED BY CHANTER/AGOSTINI TO APPROVE THE MARCH 9, 2023, REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED 3/0 WITH COMMISSIONER BRYANT ABSTAINING FROM THE VOTE.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0018, Preliminary Development Plan Case No.
PDP22-0004, and Street Name Change Case No. STN22-0001 -Linea. Applicant: Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects for Linea Rancho Mirage, LLC. Consideration to construct 9 single-family residences on 4 .63 acres of vacant land on the southern half of Tract Map No . 35089 between Ginger Rogers Road and Via Florencia. The project consists of 3 house concepts and range in size from 4,870 to 5,688 square feet. This project includes a request to change the current street name of Bellavia Court South to Via Linea . The subject property is within Section 30 on the south side of Ginger Rogers Road and approximately 1,110 feet east from the Bob Hope Drive centerline (APNs: 685-351-001 through -016).
DRAFT 3/23/2023 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 ·······················--
5-45
······································--···········································································--···························· a. Recommend that the City Council find Preliminary Development Plan Case No . PDP22 - 0004 and Street Name Change Case No . STN22-0001 exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15061(b)(3) and determine that the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA070003 is still valid for the proposed project; and,
b. Recommend that the City Council approve Preliminary Development Plan Case No.
PDP22-0004, subject to the conditions of approval and based on the content and findings in the staff report; and,
c. Recommend that the City Council approve Street Name Change Case No . STN22-0001 to change "Bellavia Court South" to "Via Linea ," based on the content and findings in the staff report .
Joy Tsai, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.
PUBLIC COMMENTS -
Dorian Whitney, Cathedral City _ resident, expressed his opposition to the project due to the affordable housing crisis and the fact that the proposed project is not an affordable housing project.
Mr . Whitney detailed his concerns about affordable housing and hoped that the city can approve projects that provide affordable housing to meet the community's needs .
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS -
Commissioner Bryant added to Vice Chair Grey's comment about the staff time and preparation needed for each projectto ensure that the Commissioners are well prepared to make an informed decision as well as the Commissioners' dedication and commitment to the c/ty.
Commissioner Bryant asked about the specific landscaping choices. He was concerned about the use of nonnative grasses and Oleander trees shown in the presentation.
Ms. Tsai responded to Commissioner Bryant landscaping concerns and stated that the applicant is not proposing live turf and that the planting selections are not considered invasive species.
MOVED/SECONDED BY BRYANT/CHANTER TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:
A. FIND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CASE NO. PDP22-0004 AND STREET NAME CHANGE CASE NO. STN22-0001 TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15162 AND 15061(8)(3) AND DETERMINE THAT THE PREVIOUSLY
ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CASE NO. EA070003 IS STILL VALID FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT; AND,
B. APPROVE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CASE NO. PDP22-0004, SUBJECT
TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND BASED ON THE CONTENT AND FINDINGS DRAFT 3/23/2023 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 ································--···············•··············································
5-46
IN THE STAFF REPORT; AND,
C. APPROVE STREET NAME CHANGE CASE NO. STN22-0001 TO CHANGE "BELLAVIA COURT SOUTH" TO "VIA LINEA," BASED ON THE CONTENT AND FINDINGS IN THE STAFF REPORT.
MOTION CARRIED 4/0.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to consider, the Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 2:27 P.M.
Prepared by: Deanna Mendoza
Development Services Technician
Date Approved by Planning Commission:
DRAFT 3/23/2023 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 ···········································•···•········································· ·······················-.
5-47
: 1.,,·.1: u ... --r·
.. , 'I'' 1'•1 l)t;YELOPM :.di Or. '
., .JI ,~ ,u ''°1
08 ti.PR -8 M~ 1~ 34
Community Development Department
69-825 Highway 111
ATTACHMENT 7
ORIGINAL
Rancho Mirage CA 92270
Phone 760/328-2266 Fax 760/324-9851
PUBLIC NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY
INITIAL STUDY AND NOTICE OF INTENT
TO ADOPT A MITIGA1~Rl ~f:o~~~!v9i1'rARATION
DATE: February 14, 2008 FFR 2 5 20 08
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
Time Warner Cable LARRY w wr,1m CL ~. Fire Marshal
Verizon Telephone By .,yv, ~!Etv'c),Postmaster
tf7 l"vllepu W, Southern California Edison LC:\J • ;::,he riff's Department Southern California Gas [g] City Engineer
Burrtec [gj Water QM~lgY9ouN .
Palm Springs Unified School District [gj City Buildih ~~f.f.t©ra:Nif 5l:R1, Coachella Valley Water Dist. [gJ Sunline Trans~P~~~y ;~~:~nao on Riverside County Flood Control District [gJ Imperial Irrigation srw . . FEB 2 -2W1,
Bud Kopp, AICP, Senior Planner i'?c r,, _,. • __
o ve r/ ___,)· ,.,..,( ----, '--_ _,,,1
13y -----!', e--
Bellavia -Case No. TTM35089, PDP07004 and Ei\:0,~;.,
0 ,s~
, c S r1 te7ii"c ,Dt:p/,
Located on two 5.04 acre parcels on the north and south sides of Gi~gg/·? Rogers Road approximately ¼ mile east of Bob Hope Drive (APN#618 - 550-005 and APN#618 -540-013), in the City of Rancho Mirage, CA AMS Development Group, LLC.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project includes the subdivision of two 5.04 acre parcels ( 10.8 acres total) into 18 single family residential lots and lettered lots for common purposes in the R-L -2 Zone . A Preliminary Development Plan provides the site plan and architectural detail of 16 different floor plans and elevations to be distributed throughout the 18 lots.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Division 13 Section 15063), the City, acting as Lead Agency, has completed an Initial Study and is proposing to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. Enclosed for your review and comment is the Initial Study, which includes the project description, location and the potential environmental effects. Please review and return your comments to the Rancho Mirage Planning Department by March 10, 2008 ;
This paper also fulfills CEQA Guidelines and constitutes our agency's attempt to consult with all Responsible and Trustee Agencies with jurisdiction over resources potentially affected by this project. If you have any questions or require further information in regard to this application, please contact Bud Kopp, AICP, Senior Planner at 328-2266.
5-48
· Draft
Initial Study and Notice of Intent
To Adopt
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Bellavia
Tentative Tract Map 35089
Preliminary Development Plan (PDP07004)
Environmental Assessment (EA07003)
February 14, 2008
Prepared for:
AMS Development Group, LLC.
PO Box 8942
Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92509
Prepared by:
Rancho Mirage Planning Department
Bud Kopp, AICP, Senior Planner
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
\
5-49
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page No.
Chapter 1 -Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Authority .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01
1.2 Determination ............................................................... 01 Chapter 2 -Project Summary
2.1 Project Location ............................................................. 02
2.2 Project Description ......................................................... 02
2.3 Summary of Mitigation Measures ....................................... 05 Chapter 3 -Environmental Checklist Form .................................................. 08 Chapter 4 -Mitigation Monitoring Program .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7
LIST OF FIGURES
2-1 Project Vicinity Map ...................................................... 03 2-2 Tentative Tract Map 35089 Site Plan .................................. 04
5-50
CHAPTER ONE -INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose and Authority
The proposed project for which this Initial Study and Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared is the approval of Bellavia - Tentative Tract Map 35089, Preliminary Development Plan (PDP07004), and Environmental Assessment (EA07003) for the City of Rancho Mirage . This document has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq. The City of Rancho Mirage will serve as the lead agency for this project pursuant to CEQA.
1.2 Determination
On the basis of the Initial Study and the evaluation of the City of Rancho Mirage's General Plan and the Environmental Impact Report thereon (SCH#2004081038), it has been determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for adoption .
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
1 5-51
CHAPTER TWO -PROJECT SUMMARY
2.1 Project Location
The project is located on two 5.04 acre parcels on the north and south sides of Ginger Rogers Road approximately ¼ mile east of Bob Hope Drive (APN#618-550-005 and APN#618 -540 -013), in the City of Rancho Mirage, County of Riverside . Map 2-1 shows the general location of the project within the City of Rancho Mirage .
2.2 Project Description
The proposed project -Bellavia, includes the subdivision of two 5.04 acres of land into a total of 18 single family residential lots and lettered lots for common purposes as shown on Map 2-2 . The proposed lots range in size from 16,089 to 22,149 square feet. A 13 ,074 square foot retention basin serving the northern half of the site plan is located at the northwest corner of Ginger Rogers and the proposed interior street , and a 9,410 square foot retention basin at the northwest corner of Via Florencia and the interior street serves the storm drain needs of the southern portion of the project area . Lettered lots along Ginger Rogers Drive will provide enhanced landscape setbacks to provide aesthetic relief per the Section 30 Design Guidelines. Each cul-de-sac will be 37 feet in width (from curb to curb) and will have a decorative, gated entry. No secondary access is provided to the cul-de-sacs on the north side of Ginger Rogers, but a second access point is provided in the southern portion of the project area with access to Via Florencia.
Landscaped bulb-outs are applied to maintain slow traffic speeds and to provide visual interest on each cul -de-sac . A minimum width of 20 feet is maintained where bulb -outs occur, and enhanced paving will be used throughout the project.
The project terrain is relatively flat, with the northern portion of the project area having pad elevations that range from 323 to 324 feet, with the bottom of the retention basin at an elevation of 316.5. The southern portion of the project has pad elevations ranging from 317 .90 to 320.50 ; with the bottom of the retention basin at an elevation of 312.8.
A Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) is also proposed, which includes four floor plans with four distinct elevations per floor plan. Homes will have two car garages with a third car garage and/or casita options. The homes range in size from 3,754 to 4,363 square feet , not including the garages and casita options. Proposed lot coverage ranges from 23% to 30%. A maximum lot coverage of 30% is permitted. Setbacks for the project include a required 25 foot front and rear yard setback, with 10 foot side yards and 15 foot · street side yards .
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
2 5-52
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14 , 2008
Map 2-1
Project Location
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
3 5-
53 Map2-2
Tentative Tract Map 35089 Site Plan
~-=-rn-.. -.. =-~.:':.-----EF..i!EF.::.::::E==·~
___________ ...,.
mr;r:= ...,_.,. ... _ .... ,_ ______ s-_, ___ _ ~"5----~=-= ==-~-=-·------------=--==-=-===--~·----i i .L/~ .,_ _____ ------------------------
::=;"sty-~ Sf 5 5 --.... ------ii~ I i as 1 = 55-= 5
r;:--·-~ -! k=--t--· . ~-r ~le ------------iii!=-=,~=:
)'.i~~i ·;:rlfl --
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
cenm,re9MP
cnznn: asm:-mmrrNr'lt ~~rr .... ----..... -· --
..... 'P ------·----------·· ::.:£ ___ _
:.-=.-=:=:------•-~ =.-::=-~ ==E:-E.-=--
--==
' ----===------111=-·---... ---------. ------------~ ... --- J ---~---------------------·------&------
.......
---N'l'>Gc::rn"CflftoVCIHO...vr,,QC
"'"
00l.lffT CP~ tlTA'ftl OI"' CALlflll0lllNA
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35089
wm-t Bin! PLAN NC
PReUMINARY OAADINO PLAN
SJlii ·;-Jr% ~Ji ~ ~~
llmlll.H .lilliJ!III.Q:A llmRLR:ll --0 ~ omrmr ""Clfl\PIN NP MMN er,.,.,,, CABTpnt NP ftQlffll 4 5-54
Land Use
The General Plan and Zoning of the project site is R-L-2 (Very Low Density Residential with a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre). The project density is at 1. 79 units per acre. All adjacent properties are also generally planned and zoned R-L-2 . The existing site is vacant, and all adjacent properties are vacant , with the exception of a single family home on a 5 acre parcel to the east of the northern half of the project.
Circulation
Homeowners will access the gated community of Bellavia from Ginger Rogers Drive.
The southern portion of the subdivision will have secondary access to Via Florencia. The project is approximately 1,320 feet east of Bob Hope Drive. Bob Hope Drive and Ginger Rogers is an existing signalized intersection.
2.3 Summary of Mitigation Measures:
Mitigation I (a) 1: The 6 foot wide multi-purpose trail located within the 19 foot wide parkway shall have a medium broom finish 4" thick P.C.C (Poured in Place Concrete).
The color shall be Davis Co. "Yosemite Brown" or approved equal. The multi-purpose trail shall be installed on both sides of Ginger Rogers and the north side of Via Florencia.
Mitigation III (b) 1: A plan to control fugitive dust through implementation of reasonably available dust control measures shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Rancho Mirage for approval prior to the issuance of any grading permits associated with the project. The plan shall specify the fugitive dust control measures to be employed .
The project proponent shall comply with all applicable SCAQMD Rules and Regulations including but not limited fo the following:
a. Rules 403 and 403.1 (Fugitive Dust) specifies control measures for use in developing site specificfogitive dust control plans to minimize blowing dust from construction sites and insure the clean up of construction related dirt on approach routes to the site including: watering measures, chemical stabilizers, wind fencing, covering haul vehicles, bed liners in haul vehicles, wheel washers and high wind measures;
b. Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) restricts the VOC (Volatile Organic Compound) content of any architectural coating materials used on-site to a maximum of 2.08 pounds of VOC per gallon.
. .
Mitigation III (a) 2: Earth -moving activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 MPH per the Coachella Valley PMlO State Implementation Plan and SCAQMD Rule 403.1.
Mitigation III (a) 3: The following watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction-generated dust particulates:
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5 5-55
a . Pre-grading site watering (irrigation system for minimum of 72 hours); b. Site watering 7 days a week (irrigation system, minimum of 4 times per 24 hors, or by water trucks, minimum 4 times per 24 hours, at 1 tr,uck/8 acres); c. Perimeter sprinkler system (all sides continuous night watering when windy); d . Portions of the project site that are undergoing earth moving operations shall be watered such that a crust will be formed on the ground surface and then watered again at the end of the day, as part of the constructions specifications. Control methods are provided in detail in the Dust Control Plan Review Guidance for Local Government" from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, available form the City of Rancho Mirage or the S.C.A.Q.M.D.; e. Any construction access roads should be paved as soon as possible and cleaned after each work day . The maximum vehicle speed limit on unpaved road surfaces should be 15 mph.
f. All trucks should maintain at least two feet of free board. g . Trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose dirt material off-site should be covered and washed off before leaving the site;
h. Adjacent streets should be swept if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares;
i. As part of the construction specifications, any vegetative ground cover to be utilized on -site shall be planted as soon as possible to reduce the disturbed area subject to wind erosion . Irrigation systems needed to water these plants shall be installed as soon as possible to maintain the ground cover and minimize wind erosion of the soil;
j. Construction operations affecting off-site roadways shall be scheduled for off- peak traffic hours and shall minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes.
Mitigation IV (a) 1: The project site lies within the Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard Mitigation Fee Area . Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall pay the currently adopted Fringe Toed Lizard Mitigation Fee or MSHCP fee if the incidental take permit is issued and is in effect and supersedes the Fringe Toed Lizard Mitigation Fee.
Mitigation IV (a) 2: In the event that the Fringe Toed Lizard HCP has expired and no incidental take permit has been issued in reliance on the CVMSHCP, then prior to ground disturbance (grading), a qualified Biologist shall conduct a site reconnaissance to determine whether · any threatened or endangered species or species of special significance are present on the site, and if such species are found, the applicant shall consult with CDFG to determine project specific mitigation which may be require to avoid significant impacts to said species.
Mitigation V (b) 1: Upon receipt of an application for a project subject to CEQA and within the City's jurisdiction, the City or City's representative shall consult with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians to determine if the proposed project is within a culturally sensitive area to the Tribe . If sufficient evidence is provided to reasonably ascertain that the site is within a culturally sensitive area then a cultural resources Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
6 5-56
assessment prepared by a City-certified archaeologist shall be required . The findings of the cultural resources assessment shall be incorporated into the CEQA documentation. A copy of the report shall be forwarded to the Tribe. The following procedure shall be followed :
Prior to the issuance of grading permits for which the CEQA document defines cultural resource mitigation for potential tribal resources , the project applicant shall contact the designated Agua Caliente B~nd of Cahuilla tribal representative to notify them of the grading, excavation and monitoring program. The applicant shall coordinate with the City of Rancho Mirage and the tribal representative to negotiate an Agreement that addresses the designation, responsibilities, and participation of tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; scheduling; terms of compensation; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources , sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site . The City of Rancho Mirage shall be the final arbiter of the conditions included in the Agreement.
Mitigation V (b) 2: Upon the uncovering or other discovery of artifacts or cultural resources during construction activities associated with the project's development, all construction on the site shall be halted , and a qualified archaeologist shall be called to the site to identify the resource and recommend mitigation in the event of the resource 's cultural significance.
Mitigation XIII (a) 1: Participation in a Community Facilities District to mitigate the impact on police and fire protection resources .
Mitigation XVI (d) 1: : Implementation of various water conservation measures -as identified in the CVWD Water Management Plan and the City Ordinance requiring water conserving landscape design is required in order to reduce impacts to water supply to a less than significant le v el.
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
7 5-57
CHAPTER THREE -ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
·1. Project Title : Bellavia -Tentative Tract Map 35089, Preliminary Development Plan (PDP07004), and Environmental Assessment (EA07003)
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Mirage Planning Department, 69 - 825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage , CA 92270
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Bud Kopp AICP, Senior Planner (760) 328-2266
4. Project Location : The proposed project is located in the City of Rancho Mirage, Riverside County, California. The geographic area covered by the project includes approximately 10.8 gross acres including Assessors Parcel Numbers 618-550-005 and 618-540-013. The project site is located approximately 1,320 feet east of the intersection of Bob Hope Drive and Ginger Rogers Drive.
5. Project Sponsor Name and Address: AMS Development Group , LLC ., PO Box 8942, Rancho Santa Fe , CA 92509
6 . Land Use/Zoning Designation : Very Low Density Residential -2 d.u./ac max (R -L-2) 7 . Description of Project: The project includes the subdivision of two 5.04 acre parcels (10.8 acres total) into 18 single family residential lots and lettered lots for common purposes in the R-L-2 Zone. A Preliminary Development Plan provides the site plan and architectural detail of 16 different floor plans and elevations to be distributed throughout the 18 lots.
8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: All adjacent properties are also designated as Very Low Density Residential -2 d.u./ac max (R-L -2)
9. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits , financing approval , or participation agreement.):
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages :
[8J Aesthetics □ Agriculture Resources [8J Air Quality
[8J Biological Resources [8J Cultural Resources □ Geology /Soils □ Hazards & Hazardous □ Hydrology I Water □ Land Use / Planning Materials Quality
□ Mineral Re sources □ Noise □ Population / Housing
[8J Public Services □ Recreation □ Transportation/Traffic [8J Utilities / Service Systems □ Mandatory Findings of Significance Bellavia 8
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-58
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
□
[2J
□
□
□
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required .
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed .
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION , including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required .
Lead Agency Signature Date
Bud Kopp. AICP, Senior Planner
Printed Name '
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
9 5-59
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS --Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
□ □ □
Response: The residential character of the community is a pattern of low density residential development surrounded by open space and natural scenery in a resort setting. The natural landscape features, including the surrounding desert context and mountain vistas, are essential components to its overall visual character. The policies in the 2005 General Plan Update, especially the Community Design Element, promote the preservation of scenic views. Section 30 provides for multi-purpose trails in the required 19 foot wide parkway with enhanced setbacks along the public streets. Although the previously adopted Design Guidelines for Section 30 specified that a decomposed granite trail would be the standard; maintenance and erosion of the trail proved aesthetically unacceptable, and the City Council revised the Design Guidelines to require a paved multi-purpose trail as mitigated.
The implementation of the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and with mitigation would not adversely impact scenic vistas in the Rancho Mirage area with the addition of the following mitigation (General Plan EIR, SCH#2004081038, page 5-2):
Mitigation I (a) 1: The 6 foot wide multi-purpose trail located within the 19 foot wide parkway shall have a medium broom finish 4" thick P.C.C (Poured in Place Concrete).
The color shall be Davis Co. "Yo5lemite Brown" or approved equal. The multi-purpose trail shall be installed on both sides of Ginger Rogers and the north side of Via Florencia.
Impact Level after Mitigation: Less than Significant.
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited to,
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
Response : See Response to I (a).
c) Substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of the site and
its surroundings? ,
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□
□
□ □
□ □
10 5-60
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response : The Section JO Design Guidelines, as revised, identify that the character. of the area is to be maintained as low density and rural and the over abundance of small, gated communities with their fortress like appearance as seen from public streets should be discouraged. The applicant proposes wrought iron gates at the project entries that provide view windows into the project and mitigate the fortress like appearance. d) Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the area?
□ □ □
Response: The project will include exterior and interior lighting commonly found in low density residential neighborhoods. All lighting will comply with City standards to minimize light and glare. Standards include fully shielded fixtures, down-lighting, and photometric plans that demonstrate confinement of lighting to the project site. The City of Rancho Mirage is within Zone B of the Palomar restricted nighttime light zone and the City must comply with these County standards. The County Light Pollution Ordinance contains light requirements and standards intended to limit light leakage and spillage that may interfere with the operations of the Palomar Observatory. Furthermore, the Community Design Element of the General Plan Update recognizes the importance of minimizing the impacts of artificial light to nighttime views of the sky and contains policies that protect nighttime views from excessive glare. As such, the implementation of this project is consistent with the General Plan Update and would not substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of Rancho Mirage. General Plan EIR Section 5.15 states that implementation of existing regulatory programs and conditions of approval would serve to mitigate the potential light and glare impacts of the proposed project to levels determined to be less than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-3, 5-6).
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In
determining whether impacts to
agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may
refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model
(1997) prepared by the California Dept.
of Conservation as an optional model to
use in assessing impacts on agriculture
and farmland . Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
11 5-61
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response: No areas within the City are designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The proposed project would not result in the conversion of existing farmland to non-agricultural use and no Williamson Act Contract exists within the City. Therefore, the issue is not addressed in the General Plan EIR and need not be addressed in this Initial Study as the condition remains the same (General Plan EIR, Appendix A, page A-32).
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
Response: See Response to II (a).
c) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Response: See response to II (a).
III. AIR QUALITY --Where available,
the significance criteria established by
the applicable air quality management or
air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct ·
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
Response: The City of Rancho Mirage is located in the SSAB and is subject to the rules and Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
12 5-62
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
regulations imposed by the SCAQMD. All emissions within the City of Rancho Mirage are governed by the CAAQS as well as the NAAQS. The project would be subject to SCAQMD Rule 403-1 (governing fugitive dust emissions from project construction within the Coachella Valley). The proposed project complies with and is consistent with the adopted2005 General Plan and General Plan EIR. There is no substantial evidence that changes have occurred to the project area and no known circumstances have changed to justify further environmental analysis beyond that already described in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the project is consistent with the provisions as set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 Section 15162, and no further analysis is required. Upon implementation of project design features as identified in Section 5.2.5 of the General Plan EIR, regulatory requirements, and standard conditions of approval, the impacts would be Jess than significant. b) Violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation?
□ □ □
Response: Construction equipment and construction related activities for the proposed project will contribute to short term air quality impacts including emissions from construction vehicle traffic as well as fugitive dust. The applicant will be required to adhere to the City's Fugitive _ Dust and Erosion Control policies and ordinance to minimize potential construction related emissions. An approved Fugitive Dust (PMl O) Control Plan will be required prior to issuance of a grading permit. This fine particulate matter (PMl O) can create an air quality hazard when dust is blowing. Watering the surface, planting grass or landscaping, or placing hardscape normally mitigates this hazard.
Potential operational emissions throughout the life of the project will result primarily from mobile vehicle trips related to residents in the 18 residential units. Cumulative emissions from the project and surrounding projects will exceed the SQAMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District) daily emissions significance threshold criteria for carbon monoxide, reactive organic compounds and oxides of nitrogen. In order to reduce impacts to less than significant the following measures are recommended:
Mitigation III {b) 1: A plan to control fugitive dust through implementation of reasonably available dust control measures shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Rancho Mirage for approval prior to the issuance of any grading permits associated with the project. The plan shall specify the fugitive dust control measures to be employed. The project proponent shall comply with all applicable SCAQMD Rules and Regulations including but not limited to the following:
a. Rules 403 and 403.1 {Fugitive Dust) specifies control measures for use in Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
13 5-63
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
developing site specific fugitive dust control plans to minimize blowing dust from construction sites and insure the clean up of construction related dirt on approach routes to the site including: watering measures, chemical stabilizers, wind fencing, covering haul vehicles, bed liners in haul vehicles, wheel washers and high wind measures;
b .. Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) restricts the VOC (Volatile Organic Compound) content of any architectural coating materials used on-site to a . maximum of 2.08 pounds of VOC per gallon.
Mitigation III (a) 2: Earth-moving activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 MPH per the Coachella Valley PMlO State Implementation Plan and SCAQMD Rule 403.1.
Mitigation III (a) 3: The following watering techniques shall be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction-generated dust particulates:
a. Pre-grading site watering (irrigation system for minimum of 72 hours); b. Site watering 7 days a week (irrigation system, minimum of 4 times per 24 hors, or by water trucks, minimum 4 times per 24 hours, at 1 truck/8 acres); c. Perimeter sprinkler system (all sides continuous night watering when windy); d. Portions of the project site that are undergoing earth moving operations shall be watered such that a crust will be formed on the ground surface and then watered again at the end of the day, as part of the constructions specifications. Control methods are provided in detail in the Dust Control Plan Review Guidance for Local Government" from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, available form the City of Rancho Mirage or the S.C.A.Q.M.D.; e. Any construction access roads should be paved as soon as possible and cleaned after each work day. The maximum vehicle speed limit on unpaved road surfaces should be 15 mph;
f. All trucks should maintain at least two feet of freeboard; g. Trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose dirt material off-site should be covered and washed off before leaving the site;
h. Adjacent streets should be swept if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares;
i. As part of the construction specifications, any vegetative ground cover to be utilized on-site shall be planted as soon as possible to reduce the disturbed area subject to wind erosion. Irrigation systems needed to water these plants shall be installed as soon as possible to maintain the ground cover and minimize wind erosion of the soil;
j. Construction operations affecting off-site roadways shall be scheduled for off-peak traffic hours and shall minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes.
Bellavia 14
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-64
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
Incorporation
Impact Level after Mitigation: Less than Significant.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable □ □ □
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
Response: See Response to III (a).
d) Expose sensitive receptors to □ □ □
substantial pollutant concentrations?
Response: There are no sensitive receptors in the area would not be significantly adversely affected by CO emissions generated by operation of the proposed project. The impact would be Jess than significant. (Rancho Mirage General Plan Update, page 5 -21. Also See Response to III (a).
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?
□ □ [8] □
Response: Construction activity will require the operation of equipment which may generate exhaust from either gasoline or diesel fuel. Construction and development will also require the application of paints and the paving of roads which could generate odors from materials such as paints and asphalt. Short-term odor impacts associated with prqject construction, including diesel fumes and asphalt paving, will dissipate quickly [also see response to III (a)}.
Future residential development would involve minor, odor-generating activities, such as backyard barbeque smoke, lawn mower exhaust, and application of exterior paints from home improvement. These types and concentrations of odors are typical of residential communities and are not considered significant air quality impacts. Less than significant impacts are anticipated throughout the life of the project.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --
Would the project:
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
15 5-65
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans,
policies , or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
□
No
Impact
□
Response: The jurisdictions received take authorization for the Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard (CVFTL) pursuant to the Incidental Take Permit issued for the species and the CVFTL Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The CVFTL HCP is now being expanded into a multiple species HCP covering 1.1 million acres, 27 species and 27 natural communities (described below). When the multiple species HCP is adopted, lands currently within the CVFTL HCP will be subsumed into and managed as part of a larger multiple species reserve system.
Two regional conservation plans have been developed to protect and conserve lands within the larger Coachella Valley area and the tribal lands of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (Tribe). This project is within Section 36 of T4S, R5E, SBB&M which corresponds to the proposed MSHCP boundaries and not the Tribal HCP. The Final approval of the implementing agreement for the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) was approved in September 2007, and issuance of take permits from the USFWS and CDFG, is anticipated in March 2008. Until Take Authority is granted to plan participants, any required incidental take permits would be obtained directly from the USFWS per the existing regulatory mechanism under the FESA and· CESA. · Implementation of the CVMSHCP is contingent upon flnal approval from the USFWS and CDFG. The plan would result in the issuance of Jong-term (75-years) permits for the Incidental Take of Covered Species to the local permittees. The Permits provide for the Take of species or loss of their habitat, as long as compliance with the Plan requirements is achieved. As such, the City of Rancho Mirage, as a local permittee, does not yet have authority to issue incidental take permits pursuant to an adopted CVMSHCP. · Within the established Conservation Areas, the City would be required to ensure achievement of the Plan 's Conservation Objectives and Species Conservation Goals and Objectives. Outside of designated Conservation Areas, the City would be required to ensure compliance of public and private projects with all required measures (General Plan EIR, page 5-35).
Upon implementation of the CVMSHCP impacts to biological impacts would be less than signiflcant. However, until the CVMSHCP and Tribal HCP .are adopted, impacts could be Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
16 5-66
significant without the following mitigation:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Mitigation IV (a) 1: The project site lies within the Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard Mitigation Fee Area. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall pay the currently adopted Fringe Toed Lizard Mitigation Fee or MSHCP fee if the incidental take permit is issued and is in effect and supersedes the Fringe Toed Lizard Mitigation Fee.
Mitigation IV (a) 2: In the event that the Fringe Toed Lizard HCP has expired and no incidental take permit has been issued in reliance on the CVMSHCP, then prior to ground disturbance (grading), a qualified Biologist shall conduct a site reconnaissance to determine whether any threatened or endangered species or species of special · significance are present on the site, and if such species are found, the applicant shall consult with CDFG to determine project specific mitigation which may be require to avoid significant impacts to said species. '
Impact Level after Mitigation: Less than Significant.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies , and regulations
or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
□ □ □
Response: No riparian habitat or sensitive natural community has been identified on the project site. Implementation of the 2005 General Plan Update in accordance with existing land use designations does not allow development in these areas as they are within County open space (in the north portion of the City) and as existing reserves and National Monument lands (in the south portion of the City) not within the vicinity of the project area. No impact will occur (General Plan EIR page 5-61).
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc .) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
17 5-67
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response : Potential USACE and CDFGjurisdictional waters and wetlands within the City and SOI are also limited to drainages of the Indio Hills and Edom Hill in the northern portion of the City's SOI and the Santa Rosa Mountains and Magnesia Springs to the south. The Whitewater River and flood control channel and tributaries would also be considered under USA CE jurisdiction. Areas to the north are currently protected as County open space and as existing reserves and National Monument lands in the south. Implementation of the General Plan Update in accordance with the established land use designations would not allow development in these areas. Other areas designated for development that have riparian habitat present would be subject to the requirements of applicable 404 permits from the USA CE, USFWS review, and CDFG 1600 Stream bed Alternation Agreements. The project is not located near or within the vicinity of any of these potential wetland areas as identified in the general Plan EIR, therefore the project would have no impact on wetlands (General Plan EIR, page 5 -61).
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
□ □ □
Response : Primary movement and/or wildlife corridors are identified as being limited to drainages of the Indio Hills and Edom Hill in the northern portion of the City's SOI and the Santa Rosa Mountains, Whitewater channel and Magnesia Springs to the south. The project is not located within or ac!Jacent to a known wildlife corridor as identified in the General Plan EIR. No new information of substantial importance would alter the findings and conclusions in the previous EIR. Upon implementation of regulatory requirements and relevant plans and policies of the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan, the impacts would be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-62 , 5-64)
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
□ □ □
Response : Future project development in accordance with the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan Update would comply with relevant policies and ordinances relating to Biological Resources within the City, including ordinances that limit development within mountainous lands and hillside areas. Upon implementation of regulatory requirements and relevant plans Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
18 5-68
No Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Impact
and policies of the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan, the impacts would be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-62, 5-64).
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
□ □ □
Response : The City is currently within the Fringe Toed Lizard HCP and is a participant in the development of the proposed CVMSHCP. The Plan was approved and adopted in October 2007, and implementation should begin about March 2008. Upon full implementation, biological resources protection on the non-tribal lands portions of the City would fall within the CVMSHCP. The City, as a participating entity, (i .e., Local Permittee is required to comply with the plan. Implementation of regulatory requirements and relevant plans and policies of the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan, the impacts would be less than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-62, 5-64).
V . CULTURAL RESOURCES --Would
the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource
as defined in □ 15064.5?
□ □ □
Response: The City of Rancho Mirage prepared an intensive level survey of historic resources in the City. This Inventory included properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, California Registered Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, and properties reviewed by OHP as part of a historic resources survey or an environmental review. No structures exist on the property and no impacts to potentially historic structures listed in the database will occur.
Implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in the loss of potentially historic structures (General Plan EIR, page 5-71).
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to □ 15064.5?
□ □
Response : The entire City of Rancho Mirage and SOI are located within the tribal Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14 , 2008
□
19 5-69
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
"Traditional Use Area "as identified by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. This is a land area of prehistoric and historic patterns of settlement and mobility through the region.
Because the traditional areas of tribal use do not necessarily correspond to the checkerboard pattern of the reservation, the tribe is concerned about the protection of cultural resource sites off tribal land. Although existing regulatory measures, including the recent passage of SB I 8 address the protection of tribal, cultural resources, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians does not believe the existing regulations and procedures are adequate to protect potential resources that could be impacted by General Plan implementation outside of tribal lands. Requiring project specific cultural resource assessments areas with known cultural sensitivity would reduce impacts from build-out of the General Plan as individual site assessments would identify and catalog existing and newly found cultural resources on a _site specific level in addition to providing for project level mitigation measures to reduce impacts from loss of a potentially significant cultural resource to less than significant levels and as follows (General Plan EIR, page 5-71, 5-79):
Mitigation V (b) 1: Upon receipt of an application for a project subject to CEQA and within the City's jurisdiction, the City or City's representative shall consult with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians to determine if the proposed project is within a culturally sensitive area to the Tribe. If sufficient evidence is provided to reasonably ascertain that the site is within a culturally sensitive area then a cultural resources assessment prepared by a City-certified archaeologist shall be required. The findings of the cultural resources assessment shall be incorporated into the CEQA documentation.
A copy of the report shall be forwarded to the Tribe. The following procedure shall be followed:
Prior to the issuance of grading permits for which the CEQA document defines cultural resource mitigation for potential tribal resources, the project applicant shall contact the designated Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla tribal representative to notify them of the grading, excavation and monitoring program. The applicant shall coordinate with the City of Rancho Mirage and the tribal representative to negotiate an Agreement that addresses the designation, responsibilities, and participation of tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; scheduling; terms of compensation; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred ~ites, and human remains discovered on the site. The City of Rancho Mirage shall be the final arbiter of the conditions included in the Agreement.
Mitigation V (b) 2: Upon the uncovering or other discovery of artifacts or cultural resources during construction activities associated with the project's development, all construction on the site shall be halted, and a qualified archaeologist shall be called to the site to identify the resource and recommend mitigation in the event of the resource's cultural significance.
Bellavia 20
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-70
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Impact Level after Mitigation: Less than Significant.
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
□
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
□
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
□
Response: The majority of the City of Rancho Mirage and SOI area are located in an area with low sensitivity for paleontological resources. Although this area is not considered high sensitivity for paleontogical resources, the potential still exists for build-out or redevelopment to uncover previously undiscovered areas with paleontogical resources particularly in areas aqjacent to the Whitewater River Channel (General Plan EIR, page 5-75). No paleontological resources are known to exist on the project site. However, due to the buried nature of these resources, construction in the project area has the potential to disturb unknown paleontological resources. Compliance with Mitigation V (b) 2 would mitigate any potential findings of resources to levels determined to be Jess than significant. d) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
□ □
Response: The City and the SOI areas are located in an area determined to have high cultural sensitivity as identified in the County of Riverside General Plan. In addition, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians identifies the entire City of Rancho Mirage and SOI areas as within the Traditional Use Area. As a result, build-out of the Rancho Mirage General Plan could unearth human remains, including those outside of formal cemeteries. In addition, with implementation of the regulations listed in Section 5.4.4 of the General Plan Update EIR, potential impacts to human remains would be reduced by ensuring that if remains are uncovered all work in the vicinity of the site would be stopped and that there will be no deposition of the remains except in accordance with the California Public Resources Code Section 509198. (California Public Resources Code§ 5097.98 -Notification of discovery of Native American human remains, descendants; disposition of human remains and associated grave goods). The mitigation measures and Existing Regulations identified above would reduce potential impacts associated with Cultural Resources to a level that is less than significant (General Plan Update EIR, page 5-75 through 5-80).
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS --Would
the project: ·
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
21 5-71
a) Expose people or structures to
potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,
as delineated on the most recent Alquist -
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of
a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication
42 .
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
□
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
□
Response: The site is not within proximity of a known fault. · The approximate location of the Santa Rosa Thrust Fault is located in the mountains approximately one mile south of the urbanized portions of the City and the San Andreas Fault, Banning and Garnet Hill faults, are all located in the City 's Sphere of Influence north of Interstate 10 not within close proximity to the project site. Build-out of this project is consistent with the General Plan and will result in an increase in the number of structures and residents exposed to seismic and other geotechnical hazards. The developer will comply with Uniform Building Code (UBC) building construction standards for seismically active regions to reduce on-site ground shaking hazards to acceptable levels.
The project site does not lie within a currently delineated State of California, Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone. Well-delineated fault lines cross through this region as shown on California Geological Survey (CCC) maps; however no active faults are mapped in the immediate vicinity of the site. Active fault rupture is unlikely to occur at the project site. (Figure 5 .5-2, General Plan EIR, page 5-113).
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Response: See response to V (i) (a) 1.
iii) Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
□
□
□ □
□ □
Response: Generally, the occurrence of liquefaction in Rancho Mirage is very low (General Plan EIR, 5-10 and Figure 5. 5-4). Fine grained granular sediments susceptible to liquefaction Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
22 5-72
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
with ground water depths greater than 50 feet are generally found north of the Whitewater Wash. The General Plan does note that these conditions as described are general, and that localized conditions conducive to liquefaction should be considered in site specific geotechnical studies. See response to V (i) (a).
iv) Landslides? □ □ □
Response: The site is flat and not subject to landslides. No impact will occur. {General Plan EIR, Figure 5.5-3).
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or
the loss of topsoil?
□ □ □
Response: Grading of the site wil1 occur prior to development; a grading plan will be approved by the city that will include measures to contain any run off as well as post- construction slope stabilization. The site is greater than one acre in size and will require compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NP DES) as well as the Air Quality Management District 's regulations. Compliance with adopted procedures for grading and erosion will mitigate any impacts associated with grading the site. The development shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Fugitive Dust (PMJ O) Control Plan as part of acquiring a grading permit, and shall implement these required plans throughout construction activities.
c) Be located ori a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on-or .off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
□ □
Response: This project is not located within or adjacent to an area subject to landslide, lateral · spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. In 2003, the Coachella Valley Water District adopted a landscape model ordinance that calls for the use of water efficient vegetation in new and remodeled landscaping. This project will be subject to the provisions of that Ordinance, along with adopted building and seismic codes. Also see responses to VI (a) (i) and (iii) (General Plan EIR 5-90).
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
23 5-73
Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response: Expansive soils are not considered a hazard in the Rancho Mirage planning area because of the relatively minor amount of clay present in the various soil units. The Geotechnical investigation stated that the onsite soils are visually classified to be in the very low expansion category in accordance to the California Building Code. The impact is less than significant (General Plan EIR, Appendix A, page A-40).
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
□ □ □
Response: The City requires all new development to connect with the Sanitary Sewer System (General Plan EIR, page 5, 11 O). No septic tanks are a part of this project (Project Description).
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
□ □ □
Response: Hazardous materials are transported through the Rancho Mirage area along Highway I 11 and some local roads, and across the SOI area along the Southern Pacific Railroad line and the I-10. Arterial streets are the preferred truck routes because they minimize the exposure of residential uses from the impacts that could occur from a hazardous material accident within a local neighborhood. Designated truck routes in the City include Ramon Road, Dinah Shore Drive, Gerald Ford Drive, Monterey A venue, and Highway 111 as well as portions of Bob Hope Drive, Frank Sinatra Drive, and Country Club Drive.
The project is the construction of a residential community and it is not anticipated to involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials (Project Description). If hazardous materials are used during construction (such as fuels or oils for construction equipment, paints or solvents), the imposition of regulatory requirements and standard Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
24 5-74
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
conditions of approval would render the impact to less than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-127, 5-132, and 5-134).
b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release
of hazardous materials into the
environment?
□ □ □
Response: This project is residential in nature and will not pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment (Project Description). Also see response to VII (a).
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
□ □ □
Response: This project is within the boundaries of the Palm Springs Unified School District.
Rancho Mirage Elementary School, located at 42-895 Indian Trail, is the only public school within the City Limits, is within an existing neighborhood, and the commercial properties within ¼ mile of the site are developed. The three private schools within the City are not located within ¼ mile of any hazardous waste site that would emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials. The project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school (Project Description, Project Location). d) Be located on a site which is included
on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment?
□ □ □
Response : The site is not listed as a hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (General Plan EIR, Appendix A, page A-42 and the most · recent Cortese List located at: http://www.dtsc.ca .gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese List.cfm) Bellavia 25
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-75
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in
the project area? ·
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
□
Less Than
Significant
Impact
□
No
Impact
Response : The eastern edge of the airport is 2. 7 miles from the western Rancho Mirage City boundary. Flights approaching and departing the Palm Springs International Airport may fly over the City and the SOI, but these flights would be more than three miles from the runways and at a high altitude (General Plan EIR, page 5-130, 5-134). f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
□ □ □
Response : The City of Rancho Mirage has one helipad at the Eisenhower Medical Center, located north of the Emergency Department, and approximately two miles south of the project site. There are no private airstrips or heliports within the City listed with the California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics. The primary risks associated with heliports are take-offs and landings, but will not effect the project area. Currently, helicopter flights in and out of EMC average two flights a month. The flight path is from the east/southeast and there are no expansion plans that are anticipated to increase the frequency of over-flights . Upon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval, the impacts would be less than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-131, 5-134). g) Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
□ □ □
Response: The City of Rancho Mirage has a Multi-Hazard Functional Plan, originally adopted in 1994, which is continually updated. The two main evacuation routes in the City include I-10 and Highway 111 along with primary and minor arterial streets serving as secondary routes. Since earthquakes, floods, fires, or other disasters may render certain routes impassible, specific evacuation routes are not identified in the plan because they can change depending upon the type of emergency. As the project is consistent with the General Bellavia 26
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-76
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Plan, the project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with the adopted Multi-Hazard Functional Plan (Project Description, General Plan EIR, page 5-132). h) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas
or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
□ □ □
Response: There are no wildlands near the project site and the project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are ac!Jacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. (Project Description, General Plan EIR, page 5-132).
VIII . HYDROLOGY AND WATER
QUALITY-~ Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements?
□ □ □
Response: The City of Rancho Mirage is required to comply with NPDES, the SDWA, and CWA in addition to applicable water management plans and programs, and local regulations.
The General Plan Update contains relevant goals, policies, and programs (water conservation . including using native, drought tolerant landscaping materials, installation and utilization of water efficient plumbing fixtures, and use of reclamated water for irrigation and golf courses) that encourage the evaluation of development plans for their potential to create groundwater contamination and the conservation of a clean water supply.
The project is not expected to discharge waste except conventional domestic water wastes, and no impacts are anticipated related to this. This project is consistent with the General Plan, and the implementation of the General Plan Update has the potential to impact the quantity of runoff and other pollutants to receiving waters, especially during periods of heavy rain.
Concerns relating to water quality during construction include the containment of any potential contaminants such as gasoline and other petroleum products. Another concern is the release of any construction related storm water that may contain contaminants {including sediment material.} Grading of soils creates the chance of erosion and potential introduction of sediments to existing area water systems, especially when construction storm water is allowed to flow into public streets. As discussed previously, the site is greater than one acre in Bellavia 27
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-77
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
size and will require compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) as well as the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) regulations during any grading and construction activities. Compliance with adopted procedures for grading and erosion will mitigate any impacts associated with grading and water quality.
Standard conditions of approval and for obtaining grading and building permits include the developers preparation and implementation (throughout all construction activities)of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Fugitive Dust (PMJ O) Control Plan.
Construction site Best Management Practices are also implemented to prevent any contamination of water that could occur as a result of construction activities of the proposed project. Upon implementation of regulatory requirements as identified in the General Plan EIR and standard conditions of approval, the impacts would be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, regulations Sections 5 .7.4, and 5.7 .5, page 5-164). b) Substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume
or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to
a level which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
□ □ ,□
Response: Long term ground water levels in the area are currently being stabilized by actions including the practice of artificial recharge of State Water Project supplies and other surplus water, orderly expansion of recycled water system and aggressive investment in and promotion of conservation programs. Groundwater sources are being recharged via imported water carried by the Metropolitan Water District Colorado River Aqueduct, which passes through the north end of the Coachella Valley. The project is not expected to impact groundwater recharge capability. Though development of the project will include impervious surfaces (rooftops and pavement) storm flows will be diverted to on-site retention basins and be allowed to percolate to groundwater. The project will be expected to follow water conservation guidelines included within the City of Rancho Mirages General Plan to mitigate the impacts to public water supplies.
The proposed project will not result in impacts related to a substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater. Impacts to groundwater supplies and recharge capability from the proposed 18 dwelling units and are expected to be less than significant with the project's final drainage Bellavia 28
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-78
design.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
This project is consistent with the General Plan, and the implementation of the General Plan Update , which contains goals, policies, and programs encouraging water conservation. The City has adopted an ordinance to require water conserving landscape design including the use of native desert plants, drought resistant landscaping, and efficient irrigation technology in private and public landscaping applications. In addition, the CVWD indicated in the General Plan Update that the District has sufficient water supply to meet the anticipated demand of the proposed implementation of the General Plan (Generaj Plan EIR, page 5-I 56).
Upon implementation of regulatory requirements as identified in the General Plan EIR and standard conditions of approval, the impacts would be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, regulations Sections 5.7 .4, and 5.7.5, page 5-164).
c) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner
which would result in substantial erosion
or siltation on-or off-site?
□ □ □
Response: The ordinance requires on-site retention of storm water with the development of undeveloped properties of one gross acre or more in size located north of the Whitewater River Channel for the volume of runoff resulting from a I 00-year storm with a time duration that generates the maximum storm water volume (Section I 5. 64. I 40).
The site is relatively flat and contains no streams or rivers. There are no "Waters of the United States " or surface waters that have drainage paths across the property. As storm runoff foJJows its present course, spreading southerly on the project site, two proposed retention basins will be provided at the south west corner of each 5 acre parcel as shown on the site plan. The shallow sump area that will act as a terminal retention basin for the storm runoff and percolation will occur at the basin after rainfall events. The project is designed to accept existing storm water flows and accommodate storm water on site to the I 00-year, 24-hour storm. The project is within the scope of the existing General Plan EIR and no additional impacts beyond those already identified will occur (Preliminary Hydrology Report for Bellavia, Tentative Tract Map No . 35089, MSA Consulting, Inc., April 4, 2007, General Plan EIR, Existing Regulations Section 5.7.4 , page 5-155, 5-161, 5-164). d) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
29 5-79
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Impact
· Mitigation
Incorporation
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on-or off-site?
Response: See response to VIII (c)
e) Create or contribute runoff water □ □ □
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
Response: See Response to VIII (c) and (d).
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water □ □ □
quality?
Response: See Response to VIII (a).
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood □ □ □
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance
Rate Map or other flood hazard
delineation map?
Response: The project site is not located within a Flood Hazard Area {General Plan EIR Figure 5. 7 -5) and the project would not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area.
The Hydrology Report for this project (Preliminary Hydrology Report for Bellavia, Tentative Tract Map No. 35089, MSA Consulting, Inc., April 4, 2007) indicates that the property is within Flood Zone C (FIRM Panel Number 060245 1595 B, September 30, 1988) which indicates minimal flooding. Therefore, impacts related to storm flows will be less than significant.
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard
area structures which would impede or
redirect flood flows?
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
30 5-80
Response: See Response to VIII (g).
i) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
□
Less Than
Significant
Impact
□
No
Impact
Response : This project is not within close proximity of any dam or levee. This project as a part of implementing the General Plan would not expose people or structures to flooding as a result of a levee or dam. Moreover, the hazard of earthquake-induced dam inundation in the Rancho Mirage area is considered nil (Also see response to VIII (g)) (General Plan EIR, page 5 -158).
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow?
□ □ □
Response: Although mudflows and seiches (predominantly localized near swimming pools or with reservoir tanks upslope from developed areas near Magnesia Spring Canyon) are a potential hazard in the City, this project is not located near a large body of water or slope that would cause such impa ct . Due to the geographical location of the project, there would not be an impact by seiche, tsunami or mudflow hazards (General Plan EIR, page 5-159).
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established
community?
□ □
Response: The implementation of the project will preserve the established community, □
is consistent with implementation of the General Plan and will not result in the physical division of an established community. The project is consistent with programs that encourage the preservation or enhancement of the existing community through infill development and open space opportunities, as well as the continuance of the City 's resort/residential character and development of compatible uses that will enhance the existing character of Rancho Mirage {Project Description, Official Land Use and Zoning Map, General Plan EIR, page 5-184). b) Conflict with any applicable land use
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
31 5-81
(including, but not limited to the general
plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating
an environmental effect?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response: The project is consistent with the City General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The General Plan Update is consistent with the ten core policies of SCAG 's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCPG) that are relevant to the proposed project.
Furthermore, the General Plan Update is consistent with the majority of SCAG 's ancillary/advisory policies. The consistency of the General Plan Update with each of SCA G's applicable regional policies is described in Table 5 8-5 of the General Plan Update. This table also demonstrates that the General Plan Update contains policies that encourage the City to participate in regional programs and issues. The project is not located within the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Reservation boundary.
Upon implementation of the programs, regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval identified in Section 5.85 of the General Plan EIR, the impacts would be less than significant.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
□ □ [8J □
Response: See response to IV (a) -Biological resources. Implementation of the project is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan and would not result in a conmct with the CVMSHCPINCCP but provides policies to encourage the preservation and conservation of natural habitats in the Rancho Mirage area (General Plan EIR, page _ 5-195).
X. MINERAL RESOURCES --Would
the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state?
□ □ □
Response : All areas within the City south of Interstate 10 are within Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ) 1 and 3 (Figure 5. 9-1 General Plan EIR). MRZ-1 is defined as a Mineral Resource Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008 .
32 5-82
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Zone where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present or likely to be present. MRZ-3 is a Mineral Resource Zone where the significance of mineral deposits cannot be determined from the available data. Upon implementation of regulatory requirements and General Plan Update policies, the impacts would be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-200, 5-205).
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally-important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan?
Response: See response to X (a).
XL NOISE: Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation
of noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards
of other agencies?
□ □ □
□ □ □
Response : The project is not sited within the 65 dBA CNEL contours as shown on Table 5.10- 9 in the City 's General Plan EIR. The City Noise Element indicates that exterior noise levels at residential locations should not exceed a CNEL of 65 dB while interior levels shall not exceed an annual CNEL of 45 dB in any habitable room. The project will be in compliance with City Noise Element requirements for exterior and interior noise levels. With implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval, the project related impacts would be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-218 , 5-240) b) Exposure of persons to or generation
of excessive ground borne vibration or
ground borne noise levels?
□ □ □
Response : This project is surrounded by streets having low traffic volumes and low noise levels. Interior streets are private, gated, and wm accommodate trips from 18 dwelling units.
Bob Hope Drive, the nearest arterial, has a CNEL contour of 262 feet to the 65 dBA line.
Since this project is over ¼ mile from Bob Hope Drive, no impact will occur (General Plan EIR, Table 5.10-9).
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
33 5-83
c) A substantial permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
□
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
□
Response: No new information of substantial importance would alter the findings and conclusions in the previous EIR, and the proposed use is consistent with all Elements of the General Plan. Also See response to XI (a).
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
□ □ □
Response: Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction. First, the transport of workers and movement of materials to and from the site could incrementally increase noise levels along local access roads. The second type of short-term noise impact is related to noise generated at the job site during site preparation, grading and/or physical construction. This project is consistent with the General Plan Update and no additional or new environmental effects would occur that have not already been analyzed as a result of . project implementation. Compliance with City Ordinances is mandatory and as such, does not constitute mitigation under CEQA. Upon implementation of the programs, regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval, no significant impacts will occur (CEQA Section 15162, General Plan EIR, page 5-217, 5-218) ·
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
□ □ □
Response: Aircraft from the Palm Springs International Airport also contribute to this noise.
The City is not located within the 65 dBA CNEL contours of this airport or any private airports (General Plan EIR, page 5-215).
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
34 5-84
private airstrip, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
Response: 5(:!e response to XI (e).
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING --
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth
in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses)
or indirectly (for example , through
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
□
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
□
Response: The project would develop 18 homes on approximately 10 acres {less than 2 dwemng units per acre). The project is consistent with the Rancho Mirage General Plan and General Plan EIR which plans for growth 20 years into the future to 2025. This project does not cause a significant growth inducing impact by itself, and the statement of overriding considerations made by the General Plan EIR considers the cumulative impact of building out the General Plan. No new or unanticipated environmental effects would be caused by this project not previously covered in the EIR, and no new information of substantial importance would alter the findings and conclusions in the previous EIR. Therefore, this project is consistent with the provisions of CEQA Section 15162, and no further assessment is required (General Plan EIR, page 5-245, 5-250, CEQA Section 15162). b) Displace substantial numbers of
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
□ □ □
Response : The project site is currently vacant, and no displacement wm occur (Project Description).
c) Displace substantial numbers of
people, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
35 5-85
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Response : The project site is currently vacant and no displacement will occur (Project Description).
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:
Fire protection? □ ~ □
Police protection? □ ~ □
Schools? □ □ ~
Parks? □ □ ~
Other public facilities? □ □ ~
No
Impact
□
□
□
□
□
Response -Police and Fire Services: The population growth associated with the development of this project will not surpass the growth predicted by the General Plan, and the policies of the General Plan require that developers provide adequate utilities and public facilities associated with development.
The City provides for fire and police service through the City's General Fund, Redevelopment Agency, and other funds . The additional police and fire personnel, building and material costs caused by this project would be offset through the increased revenue and fees generated by the development. As a result, sufficient revenue would be available for necessary service improvements to provide for adequate police and fire facilities, equipment and personnel upon implementation of the project consistent with the provisions of the General Plan. The Existing Bellavia 36
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-86
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Regulations identified on page 5-253 of the General Plan EIR along with project specific mitigation measures would serve to mitigate the potential impacts of the proposed project to levels determined to be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-253): · Mitigation XIII (a) 1: Participation in a Community Facilities District to mitigate the impact on police and fire protection resources.
Impact Level after Mitigation: Less than Significant.
Response -Schools : Individual developments within the City of Rancho Mirage and SOI are required to pay school impact fees under SB 50. Payment of these fees would offset impacts from increased demand for school services associated with build-out of the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan by providing an adequate financial base to construct and equip new and existing schools. The Existing Regulations identified in the General Plan EIR (page 5 -259) would reduce potential impacts associated with school services to a level that is Jess than significant. Compliance with payment of the School Impact Fee is mandatory and as such, does not constitute mitigation under CEQA. No other significant unavoidable adverse impacts related to Schools have been identified and the impact of 18 dwelling units is considered to be Jess than significant.
Response -Library Services: Development Impact Fee of the City of Rancho Mirage provides a mechanism for funding for libraries and library furnishings. The City of Rancho Mirage institutes a development fee on new development within the City to finance public facilities, including libraries, which are required to mitigate the impacts of development in the City.
Compliance with payment of the Development Impact Fee is mandatory and as such, does not constitute mitigation under CEQA. No other significant unavoidable adverse impacts related to Library Services have been identified and the impact is considered to be less than significant.
Response -Parks: To support the creation of parkland within the City of Rancho Mirage, the City institutes an "in-lieu "park fee for the acquisition and/or development of community parks and recreational facilities within the · City. This "in -lieu "fee is placed upon new developments if no park area is provided in whole or in part, within the subdivision. In addition to "in-lieu " park fees, developments are assessed a development fee on new development within the City to finance public facilities, including parks, under the City of Rancho Mirage Municipal Code.
Furthermore, to supplement its own recreational facilities, the City also participates in a joint-· use agreement, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), with the cities of Palm Desert and Indian WeJJs, to develop regional recreational facilities that are available to Rancho Mirage residents. The City of Rancho Mirage General Plan includes two proposed park areas within the City 's SOI The cost of recreation facilities is based upon a formula of population and assessed value consistent with the provisions of State Law. The Existing Regulations in the Bellavia 37
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14 , 2008
5-87
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
General Plan EIR (page 5-263) would reduce potential impacts associated with park services to a level that is Jess than significant. Therefore, no significant unavoidable adverse impacts relating to park services have been identified.
XIV. RECREATION --
a) Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
□ □ □
Response: The impact that residential development has on neighborhood, regional parks and other recreational facilities should consider the average age of the City's population and the fact that many residents live in gated communities containing private recreation amenities {General Plan EIR, page 5-271). The extent to which the City of Rancho Mirage can plan and implement parks, trails and other recreational facilities is related to the availability of funding.
The Quimby Act is a funding mechanism for parkland acquisition. Under this act, residential subdivisions must dedicate parkland or pay an in-lieu fee to enable the City to acquire a ratio of three (3) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. The City collects Quimby Act in-lieu fees to generate funds for park acquisition and support. The Quimby Act does not provide dedication or fees for the City 's trail system. The construction of parks and bicycle paths in Rancho Mirage is primarily funded by the City 's development impact fee. The impact fee has been established to collect fees from new developments that create a need for public facilities such as parks. Upon implementation of the project design features, regulatory requirements, and standard conditions of approval, the impacts would be Jess than significant {General Plan EIR, page 5-271, 5-27 4).
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
. the environment?
□ □ □
Response: The implementation of the project will result in the incremental fair -share need for parks and recreational facilities. When parks and recreational facilities are proposed, they will be processed in accordance with the City Municipal Code and CEQA regulations. Some proposed trails, if expanded, have the potential to impact sensitive biological areas within the Santa Rosa Mountains. However, the General Plan Update contains goals, policies and programs to mitigate potential adverse impacts to the environment that may result from build Bellavia 38
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003 ·
February 14, 2008
5-88
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
out of the General Plan. Future discretionary and environmental review is required for the development of parks and recreational facilities along with the implementation of project design features , regulatory requirements, and standard conditions of approval would render the impacts of the subject project to be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-271, 5- 274) ..
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC --
Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is
substantial in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of the street
system (i.e ., result in a substantial
increase in either the number of vehicle
trips, the volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)?
□ □ □
Response: The project would permit the construction of up to 18 dwelling units which would roughly translate into approximately 180 trips per day. Even if each dwelling had one peak hour trip, it would cause 9 additional vehicles at the north and south sides of the intersection of the project drive and Ginger Rogers Drive (18 trips total). Some trips may be dispersed to · Via Florencia on the south side; most would probably impact the intersection of Bob Hope Drive and Ginger Rogers Drive. The project does not substantially increase in traffic in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system, and is consistent with the General Plan Update. All intersections affected by the project, both at the existing condition and at build-out, are at or above LOS D, the City 's threshold of significance. The Circulation Element includes improvements necessary to maintain desired levels of service in the City at build-out.
The General Plan Update noted that while the Key Largo/1-10 Freeway overpass has been proposed to relieve congestion at five key intersections (Bob Hope Drive/Ramon Road, Bob Hope Drive/Dinah Shore Drive, Monterey A venue /Dinah Shore Drive, Da Vall Drive/Ramon Road, and Da Vall Road/Dinah Shore Drive) the overcrossing is outside city boundaries in County of Riverside jurisdiction, and therefore, was be considered a significant unavoidable adverse impact because the City has no control over the implementation or timing of this improvement. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted concurrent with the General Plan Update approval.
If the City develops the fee benefit area for the construction of the Key Largo overcrossing over the 1-10 Freeway, and the project is located within this zone of benefit, payment of the Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
39 5-89
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
fee is mandatory and as such, does not constitute mitigation under CEQA. With the implementation of project design features , regulatory requirements, and standard conditions of approval would render the impacts to be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-301, 5-305).
b) Exceed, either individually or
cumulatively, a level of service standard
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads
or highways?
□ □ □
Response: The project is consistent with the adopted Circulation Element of the General Plan which includes improvements necessary to maintain adequate levels of service in the City at build-out. Also see Response to XV (a) (General Plan EIR, page 5-302). c) Result in a change in air traffic
patterns, including either an increase in
traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
□ □ □
Response: Palm Springs International Airport is located 2. 7 miles to the west of the Rancho Mirage City Limits. The western portion of Rancho Mirage within the airport's land use plan area is within Zone E "Other Airport Environs " where the risk level and noise impact are low.
In Zone E, there is no restriction on maximum residential and nonresidential densities. The project will not create any new building height standards or uses in the western part of the City that would impact the airport or that would be impacted by the airport, and does not include a stadium. The project is very low density residential limited to 20 feet/1 story in height. Upon implementation of project design features, regulatory requirements, and standard conditions of approval, the impacts would be Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-302, 5-305).
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
design feature (e .g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
□ □ □
Response: The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and would result in a new local private street, but would not increase hazards due to a design feature or inadequate emergency access. The City has adopted roadway design standards which would preclude the construction of any unsafe design features. Therefore, there would be no impacts to the Bellavia 40
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-90
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
circulation system or to emergency access as a result of the proposed project (General Plan EIR, page 5-302).
e) Result in inadequate emergency
access?
Response: See response to XV (d).
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
□
□
□ □
□ □
Response : The project is single family residential in nature. Each parcel will have a minimum of a two car garage, and some dwellings will have three car garages. The properties have adequate room for parking on site {Project description). g) Conflict with adopted policies , plans,
or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)?
□ □ □
Response: The project is consistent with the General Plan (EIR Figure 5.14 -2) where golf cart, bicycle, and pedestrian pathways are located throughout the city. The SunBus Line provides fixed route transit along major corridors in the City, and the City continues to work with Sunline in regard to the placement of tum-outs and shelters along the routes. The SunDial (dial -a-ride type) service provides low cost public transportation for ADA certified · riders. Section 30 provides for multi-purpose trails in the required 19 foot wide parkway.
Although the previously adopted Design Guidelines for Section 30 dictated that a decomposed granite trail is acceptable; maintenance and erosion of the trail proved unacceptable, and the Council revised the Section 30 Design Guidelines (See Section I, Aesthetics}. The project will have a less than significant impact with adherence to the revised guidelines and adopted policies, plans and programs for alternative transportation (General Plan EIR, page 5-303).
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS: Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board?
□ □ □
Response : This 18 dwelling unit project will cause its incremental "fair share" of increase in Bellavia 41
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
5-91
Potentially .
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
demand for water and increases in wastewater flow. The project does not by itself trigger the need for construction, but does incrementally add to the cumulative effect, which leads to the construction of additional treatment facilities or expansion of these facilities . The Palm Desert Regional Wastewater Reclamation Plant No. 10 is the regional wastewater treatment facility serving the City of Rancho Mirage, and facility has a treatment capacity of eighteen million gallons per day. In 2005, when the General Plan EIR was completed the Plant accommodated average annual sewage flows of thirteen mi1lion gallons per day.
In 2005 the Palm Desert Treatment Plant was able to accept an additional 5 million gallons of wastewater per day. As a result, the Palm Desert Treatment Plant would be able to accept additional wastewater from the City of Rancho Mirage from build-out of the General Plan.
When the District decides that expansion of the plant is necessary, the expansion project would undergo separate environmental view under CEQA. The impact of this project on the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities would be considered Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-311 , 5-321). b) Require or result in the construction of
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
Response: See Response to XVI (a).
c) Require or result in the construction of
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
· significant environmental effects?
□
□
□ □ □
□ □
Response : All development one acre or greater in size north of the Whitewater River channel are required to ensure that the existing and proposed storm water drainage system would be designed to handle peak flows from a peak 100-year storm event as stated within Section
13.05.010 of the City 's Municipal Code. The proposed project will accommodate all storm drainage in an on -site storm water retention basin. The hydrology study for this project demonstrates that the proposed retention basins have adequate capacity to handle the 1, 3, 6 and 24 hour JOO-year storm event (Also see Section IV Hydrology). No further mitigation is required (MSA Consulting, Inc., Preliminary Hydrology Report for Bellavia, Tentative Tract Map 35089, April 4, 2007).
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
42 5-92
d) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
~
Less Than No
Significant Impact
Impact
□ □
Response: Water is supplied to the City and SOI areas by the CVWD, which obtains its water supply from local ground water within the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin and imported water from the Colorado River via the Coachella Canal. The CVWD is also responsible for the management of the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin. The CVWD adopted the Coachella Valley Water District Water Management Plan in September 2002. This plan provides specifics on the current water conditions within the Coachella Valley as well as a detailed management plan that includes water.production and supplies, groundwater recharge, cooperative agreements, conservation, and water quality. The Coachella Groundwater Basin is in a state of overdraft. According to the CVWD, in the year 2003 total groundwater production within the CVWD was 203,905 acre-feet resulting in an overdraft of 71,325 acre- feet of water. Because the average natural inflow into the upper Whitewater River Sub-basin is less than the production, the CVWD relies on the continuation of the replenishment program, using imported water. With water conservation techniques described in Section VIII (b) and the following mitigation, the project level impacts would be considered Jess than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-321): ·
Mitigation XVI (d) 1: : Implementation of various water conservation measures as identified in the CVWD Water Management Plan and the City Ordinance requiring water conserving landscape design is required in order to reduce impacts to water supply . to a less than significant level.
Impact after Mitigation: Less th.an significant.
e) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the projects
projected demand in addition to the
providers existing commitments?
Response: See Response to XVI (b).
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
□ □ □
43 5-93
projects solid waste disposal needs?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response: Increases in population within the City of Rancho Mirage result in increases in solid waste disposal needs. According to the California Integrated Waste Management Board, residential and commercial users within the City of Rancho Mirage produced 30,826 tons of solid waste in 2000 (approximately 85 tons per day}. Disposal Rates for the City of Rancho Mirage are 2 pounds per resident per day for residential consumers. Therefore, based on the average family size of 2.36 (2000 US Census), this 18 unit single family development would increase the City 's solid waste generation by one half of one percent per year. Because many residential properties in the City are occupied on a seasonal basis, this figure will be considerably lower.
The City of Rancho Mirage participates in a diversion program with Burrtec to recycle waste products. Source reduction, recycling programs, composting and grass recycling, and recycling of construction debris are among the diversion items. In 2002, the City of Rancho Mirage diverted 45% of solid waste from landfills. As a result, impacts are considered less than significant (General Plan EIR, page 5-313).
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
Response: See response to XVI (f).
h) Other Utility providers?
□
□
□ □
□ □
Response: Southern California Edison provides electrical service in the area. The Gas Company provides natural gas service. Verizon provides telephone service to the site. Time Warner provides cable television service to the area. The Coachella Valley Water District provides water treatment/distribution services and sewer services {no septic tanks are proposed.) Utilities will be provided to the facility along public and private streets. The cost applicable to the project will be determined by the provider during the development process and costs will be borne by the developer. Upon implementation of project design features, regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval, less than significant impacts are anticipated.
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE --
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
44 5-94
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range ofa rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
□
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
□
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
□
Response: As discussed in the responses in Sections IV {Biological Resources) and V (Cultural Resources): upon implementation of project design features, regulatory requirements, standard conditions of approval, and mitigation measures identified in this Initial Study, the impacts associated with the disturbance of Biological and Cultural resources have been mitigated to a less than significant level.
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
□ □ □
Response: Population growth resulting from the development of the project is less intensive than that predicted by the 2005 General Plan Update EIR. The General Plan Update EIR has identified the impacts associated with this growth as being a growth inducing and cumulative impact that is potentially significant. This Mitigated Negative Declaration is consistent with the anticipated build-out of the project site covered in the General Plan EIR and no new information of substantial importance would alter the findings and conclusions in the previous EIR.
c) Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
□ □ □
45 5-95
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response : The project 's potential environmental effects have been mitigated to a less than significant level by the measures outlined in the Initial Study, and this Agency intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the supporting documentation herein.
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
46 5-96
CHAPTER FOUR -MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
4.1 Introduction.
Table 4-1 outlines the potential impacts and mitigation measures of the proposed project · and assigns responsibility for the oversight of each mitigation. This Table shall be included in all bid documents and included as a part of the project development.
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
47 5-
9 7
Impact
Number
I (a) 1
III (a) 1
Impact
Aesthetics,
maintenance
Air Quality
Responsible
Party
Developer
Developer
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
Table 4-1
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Mitigation Measure
The 6 foot wide multi-purpose trail located
within the 19 foot wide parkway shall have a
medium broom finish 4" thick P .C .C (Poured
in Place Concrete). The color shall be Davis
Co. "Yosemite Brown" or approved equal.
The multi -purpose trail shall be installed on
both sides of Ginger Rogers and the north
side of Via Florencia.
A plan to control fugitive dust through
implementation of reasonably available dust
control measures shall be prepared and
submitted to the City of Rancho Mirage for
approval prior to the issuance of any grading
permits associated with the project. The plan
shall specify the fugitive dust control
measures to be employed. The project
proponent shall comply with all applicable
SCAQMD Rules and Regulations including
but not limited to the following:
a. Rules 403 and 403.1 (Fugitive Dust)
specifies control measures for use in
developing site specific fugitive dust
control plans to minimize blowing dust
from construction sites and insure the
clean u_g of construction related dirt on
Impact After
Mitigation
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Approval by:
D Community
Development Director
□City Public Works
Department
□AQMD
48 5-
9 8
Impact
Number
III (a) 2
III (a) 3
Impact
Air Quality
Air Quality
Responsible
Party
Developer
Developer
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
Mitigation Measure
approach routes to the site including :
watering measures, chemical stabilizers,
wind fencing, covering haul vehicles, bed
liners in haul vehicles, wheel washers
and high wind measures;
b. Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings)
restricts the VOC (Volatile Organic
Compound) content of any architectural
coating materials used on-site to a
maximum of 2.08 pounds of VOC per
gallon.
Earth-moving activities shall be suspended
during first and second stage ozone episodes
or when winds exceed 25 MPH per the
Coachella · Valley PMlO State
Implementation Plan and SCAQMD Rule
403.1.
The following watering techniques shall be
employed to partially mitigate the impact of
construction-generated dust particulates:
a. Pre-grading site watering (irrigation
system for minimum of 72 hours);
b . Site watering 7 days a week (irrigation
system, minimum of 4 times per 24 hors,
or by water trucks, minimum 4 times per
24 hours, at 1 truck/8 acres);
c. Perimeter sprinkler system (all sides
continuous night watering when windy) ;
Impact After
Mitigation
Approval by:
D eity Public Works
Department
D AQMD
Deity Public Works
Department
DAQMD
49 5-
9 9
Impact
Number
Impact Responsible
PaI"!Y_
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
Mitigation Measure
d. Portions of the project site that are
undergoing earth moving operations shall
be watered such that a crust will be
formed on the ground surface and then
watered again at the end of the day, as
part of the constructions specifications.
Control methods are provided in detail in
the Dust Control Plan Review Guidance
for Local Government" from the South
Coast Air Quality Management District,
available form the City of Rancho Mirage
or the S.C.A.Q.M.D.;
e. Any construction access roads should be
paved as soon as possible and cleaned
after each work day. The maximum
vehicle speed limit on unpaved road
surfaces should be 15 mph;
f. All trucks · should maintain at least two
feet of freeboard;
g. Trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other
loose dirt material off-site should be
covered and washed off before leaving
the site;
h. Adjacent streets should be swept if silt is
carried over to adjacent public
thoroughfares;
i. As part of the construction specifications,
any vegetative ground cover to be
utilized on-site shall be planted as soon
Impact After
Mit!g_ation
Approval by:
50 5-
1 0
0 Impact
Number
IV (a) 1
IV (a) 2
Impact
Biological
Biological
Responsible
Party
Developer
Developer
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
Mitigation Measure
as possible to reduce the disturbed area
subject to wind erosion. Irrigation
systems needed to water these plants
shall be installed as soon as possible to
maintain the ground cover and minimize
wind erosion of the soil;
j . Construction operations affecting off-site
roadways shall be scheduled for off-peak
traffic hours and shall m1mm1ze
obstruction of through-traffic lanes.
The project site lies within the Coachella
Valley Fringe Toed Lizard Mitigation Fee
Area. Prior to issuance of grading permits,
the project proponent shall pay the currently
adopted Fringe Toed Lizard Mitigation Fee
or MSHCP fee if the incidental take permit is
issued and is in effect and supersedes the
Fringe Toed Lizard Mitigation Fee.
In the event that the Fringe Toed Lizard HCP
has expired and no incidental take permit has
been issued in reliance on the CVMSHCP,
then prior to ground disturbance (grading), a
qualified Biologist shall conduct a site
reconnaissance to determine whether any
threatened or endangered species or species
of special significance are present on the site,
and if such species are found, the applicant
shall consult with CDFG to determine project
s~cific mit!gation which may be require to
Impact After
MitiRation
Approval by:
D Community
Development Director
D City Public Works
De partment
D Community
Development Director
D California
Department of Fish &
Game
51 5-
1 0
1 Impact Impact Responsible
Number Party .
V (b) 1 Cultural Developer
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
Mitigation Measure Impact After Approval by:
Miti~ation
avoid significant impacts to said species.
Upon receipt of an application for a project · D Community subject to CEQA and within the City's Development Director jurisdiction, the City or City's representative D Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
shall consult with the Agua Caliente Band of Indians
Cahuilla Indians to determine if the proposed
project is within a culturally sensitive area to
the Tribe. If sufficient evidence is provided
to reasonably ascertain that the site is within
a culturally sensitive area then a cultural
resources assessment prepared by a City-
certified archaeo logist shall be required. The
findings of the cultural resources assessment
shall be incorporated into the CEQA
documentation. A copy of the report shall be
forwarded to the Tribe. The following
procedure shall be followed:
Prior to the issuance of grading permits for
which the CEQA document defines cultural
resource mitigation for potential tribal
resources, the project applicant shall contact
the designated Agua Caliente Band of
Cahuilla tribal representative to notify them
of the grading, excavation and monitoring
program. The applicant shall coordinate with
the City of Rancho Mirage and the tribal
representative to negotiate an Agreement that
addresses the designation, responsibilities,
52 5-
1 0
2 Impact Impact Responsible
Number Party
V (b) 2 Cultural Developer
XIII (a) 1 Public Services Developer
XVI (d) 1 Public Utilities Developer
Bellavia
TTM35089/PDP07004/EA07003
February 14, 2008
Mitigation Measure Impact After Approval by:
Mitieation
and participation of tribal monitors during
grading, excavation and ground disturbing
activities; scheduling ; terms of
compensation; and treatment and final
disposition of any cultural resources, sacred
sites , and human remains discovered on the
site. The City of Rancho Mirage .shall be the
final arbiter of the conditions included in the
Agreement.
Upon the uncovering or other discovery of □ City Public artifacts or cultural resources during Works Department construction activities associated with the D Community project's development, all construction on
Development Director
the site shall be halted, and a qualified
archaeologist shall be called to the site to
identify the resource and recommend
mitigation in the event of the resource's
cultural significance.
Participation in a Community Facilities □ City Public
District to mitigate the impact on police and Works Department fire protection resources.
Implementation of various water D Community
conservation measures as identified in the Development Director CVWD Water Management Plan and the D Coachella Valley City Ordinance requiring water conserving Water District landscape design is required in order to
reduce impacts to water supply to a less than
significant level.
53 5-103
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE ORIGt~,AL
· . • 169.~82S llti~l"!,.way}J I, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 -2898 (760) 324-45 11/328-2266 ATTACHMENT 8 w~r,;·\iJ tlii ( D \'~LOP t L,l , OE ._1.
OB ~e~,Clft~{)Pf1TER_MINATION AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION
To: 0 Office of Planning and Research ~
Sacramento, CA 958 I 4
v
Chief Deputy County Clerk
Riverside, CA 9250 I
Project Title/Case Nos.) PDP0 7 004 & Te nt a tive Tra ct Map 3 5 089 -Be llavi a Environmental Assessment Nos. EA070003
State Clearinghouse No . ____________________ _
Project Location:
Bob Hope Dr ive
and Ginge r
Rogers Dr i v e
Ra ncho Mirage,
CA 9 22 70
Notice of Determination
Project Description:
Te nta t ive Tr act Map 35089 to
s ubd i v i d e t wo 5 .0 4 ac re p arce l s
(10.8 acres total) int o 1 8 s ing le
fa mi ly re s i d e ntia l lot s a nd
lettered lo t s f or common purposes
i n t h e R-L-2 Zon e . Th e
Prelimi na r y De velopme n t Plan Case
No . P DP07004 was app rove d that
con sists of 4 dif f e r e nt flo or
plan s wit h 1 6 e l e v atio ns to b e
d istribu ted t hrougho u t t h e 18
lots .
Applicant/Representative:
Mr. Kirk Wal la c e
AMS Developme nt Group
7724 Mission Blvd
Rive r si.de, CA 92509 I~ u lb ~ ,-
-PII/FPc;1n~ rm JNTv I C
OCT 1 6 200 8
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Public Resources Code, Section 21108 or 2 11 52. The City of Rancho Mirage has approved the above described project on September 4, 2008 and has determined:
I. The project D will 12] will not have a significant effect/impact on the environment.
2. 0 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to th e provisions of CEQA. 12:J A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3 . A Statement of Overriding Considerations O was 12] was not adopted for this project.
4. Findings 12] were O were not made pursuant to the provisions ofCEQA.
Th~ Ci~ Cou~cil adopted the _Fo llowin g Finding: :~e propo~ed project ha~ been reviewed in compl_i~~e wit ·lqe ro~i~ions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This 1s to certify that the project file and record ofproJec , ~ffe<>.~1 vm_lf!e_l ~ f. the genera l public at: City of Rancho Mirage, 69-825 Highway 111 , Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. ·J/ec/ /Jo, Al?/c Deterrnm .
P()Si C 21152 c!hu,,
Negative Declaration -Rancho Mirage City Council fr
d (l f/4k== fl,.n,0v,,. ocr I,. 2008
Bud Kopp 2:Y .c /~ Z} d
Senior Planner iy ·---~__,,.,,, .. --.. L_D
'.1t11,;,. n' ~ --~
Date: September 5, 2008
~ ... ,e,,~,.~ ..... __
Cert ification : I hereby certify that the City of Rancho Mirage has made the above findings of fact and that based up~n t h8 1iilitia :-~Y,:'and hearing record , the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 71 L~ 'of the Fish and Grune Code.
Date: September 5. 2008
~ Lead Agency 0 Responsible Agency
BGct Kopp
Senior Planner
5-
1 0
4 ~-~-,-1 ))!-I -;.i,...,J1~~~~~.;.._-;i
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CA
Iii
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
ARCHITECTS· INTERIORS
ATTACHMENT 9
5-
1 0
5 □ SQUARE FOOTAGES
LOT# AND LOT size
LOT#-10
LOT SIZE: 15,983 SF
LOT•11
LOT SIZE: 16,834SF
Lor,12
LOTSIZE:15.-462SF
LOT#1J
LOTSIZE:16 ,148SF
LOT #14
LOT SIZE: 16.919 SF
LOT•tS
LOTS1ZE:18,159SF
LOT#16
LOT SIZE: 18,159 SF
Lor,11
LOT SIZE: 17,Sl0SF
LOTll:18
LOT SIZE : 111,243 SF
-
V1MOOEL
L1 MODEL
V2 MODEL
l2MODEL
LJMOOEL
H1 MODEL
H2 MODEL
HJ MODEL
30'6, MAX LOT TOTAL SF ALLQWED
COVERAGE (W1TM 240 SF 3~AR BONUS)
4,794.9 SF 5,034.9 SF
5,050.2 SF 5,290.2 SF
4,638.6SF 4,878.6SF
4JS44.4SF S,0&4.4SF
S,075.7 S F 5,315.7SF
5,447.7SF S,687.7SF
S,447.7SF 5,687.7SF
5.253.0SF 5,493.OSF
S,4n.9sF 5 ,712.9SF
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
PRQ POS ED ~
IWIIliOUI Z:!ll Sf ~
29.8'11,
,...,.
29.9-A.
,._.,.
,._.,.
'°·'"'
29.9%
TOTAL SF PROPOSED
4,256.2 SF HOUSE
744.0 SF GARAGE
5,0 00.2 SF TOTAL
4.293.0 SF HOUSE
368.0 SF CASITA
627.SSF GARAGE
5,288.5 SF TOTAL
4 ,11 9.2 SF HOUSE
750.9 SF GARAGE
4,87 0.1 SF TOTAL
4.070.4 SF HOUSE
368.0 SF CASITA
642.3 SF GARAGE
5,080.7 SF TOTAL
4 ,293.0 SF HOUSE
368.0 SF CASITA
627.5 SF GARAGE
5,288.6 SF TOTAL
5,000.0 S F HOUSE
687.6 SF GARAGE
5,687.6 SF TOTAL
5,000.0 SF HOUSE
687.6 SF GARAGE
5,687.6 SF TOTAL
4,37 1.9 SF HOUSE
368.0 SF CASITA
715.6 SF GARAGE
5,455.5 SF TOTAL
5,000.0 SF HOUSE
687.6 SF GARAGE
5,687.6 SF TOTAL
□ EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES
FIR EPLACE VENT
2. CEMENT PLASTER WITH LIGHT SAND TEXTURE. PAINTED
3. W INDOW FRAME IN CLEAR OR DARK BRONZE ANODIZED
ALUMI NUM
4 . EGRESS WINDOW
5. ENTRY DOOR WI SIDELITE TO BE FIBERGLASS SWING OR
PIVOT .
6. POLYURETHANE INSULATED GARAGE DOOR PAINTED
7 , TH ERMA.LL Y BROKEN SLIDING GLASS DOORS
8. ARCHITECTURAL STONE VENEER, FINAL SPEC. PER
DEVELOPER
9. FINISH GRADE 6" BELOW FINISH FLOOR
10. EXTERIOR HOUSE NUMBER 6". BUT NO MORE THAN 8" IN
HEIGHT [RMMCSECTION 17.28.120(8))
11. CONTROL JOINT
12. -EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXTE RIOR FRENCH DOOR WITH FROSTED GLASS
1 L EQUIPMENT
13. TANKLESS WATER HEATER
14. UTILITIES
15. OUTDOOR SHOW E R
16. BBQ
17. CASITAICABANA
□ ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES
45 MIL FIBERTITE-SM MEMBRANE (COLOR : OFF-
WHITE). H•SHIELD CG HUNTER PANELS ENERGY
SMART POLYISO INSULATION BOARD (R-VALU E: 5.7).
ROOF ASSEMBLY TO HAVE CLASS "A" FIRE RATING.
2. CRICKET. TYPICAL.
3. ROOF DRAIN (DOWNS POUT & OVERFLOW).
4. LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW, TYPICAL
5. GENERAL LOCATIO N OF PV INSTALLATION.
EXACT SIZE ANO LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED
BY DEVELOPE R'S SPECIFICATIONS.
ROOF PARAPET, TYPICAL. SEE ROOF PLANS FOR
PARAPET HEIGHTS
o SHEET INDEX ~
ADOO COVE R SHEET
A00 1 SHEET INDEX I KEYNOTES
N102 MATER IAL BOARD
A 100 OVERALL SITE PLAN
A201 RE NDER ED STREET ELEVATIONS
A301 SITE SECTIONS
L1-000
Ll-100
L1-200
L1-300-L1..J01
L1-302
Ll-000
L1-SOO
V2-000
V2-100
V2-200
L1 MODEL
L1 SITE PLAN
L 1 FLOOR PLAN
L1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
L1 CASITA ELEVATIONS
L1 ROOF PLAN
L1 30 P ERSPECTIVE
VlMOOEL
o PROJECT PHASING & CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE V2-300 Vl~·Vl-401 V2-500
Vl SITE PLAN
Vl FLOOR PLAN
CABANA PLANS
Vl EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
Vl ROOF PLAN
~
V2-600
H2-000
H2-100
H2-200
H2-300-H2..J01
H2-<00
HZ-500
VJ-000
\13-UJO
VJ-000
V3-300-V3-301
VJ-302
VJ-000
VJ-500
V2 30 PERS PECTIVE
H2 MODEL
H2SITE PLAN
H2 FLOOR PLAN
H2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
H2 ROOF PLAN
H2 30 PERSPECTIVE
V3MOOEL
V3 S ITE PLAN
V3 FLOOR PLAN
V3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
V3 CASITA ELEVATIONS
V3 ROOF PLAN
V3 30 PERSPECTIVE
LANDSCAPE; ARCHITECT URE
U).00 OVERALL PROJECT KEY MAP
L-1.00-L-1.03 CON STRUC TION Pt.ANS
L-2.00 CONSTRUCTION DE TAILS
L-3.00 • L..J.05 IRRIGATION PLANS
l,.f_QO IRRIGATION DETAILS
L•S.00-L-5.G4 PLANTING & LIGHTING Pt.AN
L-6,00 PLANTING DETAILS
L-7.00 LICHTING DETAILS
ROUGH GRAPING
1. COVER SHEET
2. ROUG H G RADING
3, DETAILS AND SECTIONS
HORIZONTAL CONTROL
PREST I VUKSIC I G REENW O OD SHEET INDEX
-\ l.' Ct-I C l ' • IN ' f I< I
·~~" ... r"-11 0 ,\Vl ,~ll JOO l rA(M llli.l~I C,\ •ulA) Sc.ii.; Asindicallld Shnt; A001
~
~
5-
1 0
6 WINDOW & SLIDER FRAMES
1) CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM
2) DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMIN UM
LIMESTONE WALL VENEER
CLASSIC LIMESTONE HONED
LINEA L1 PLAN
LOT 11
LINEA H2 PLAN
LOT 16
PAINT
Pl OEW340
WHISPER
PAINT
P20EC78
MINER 'S OUST
LIMESTONE WALL VENEER
METRO BLUE HONED
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
P3
PAINT
P3DE6213
FINE GRAIN
PAINT
P4SW7008
ALABASTER
PS
PAINT
PSSW7052
GRAY AREA
UUESTONE WALL VENEER
CHELLAH GREY HONED
ENTR Y DOOR PAINT
1) DE6377 BOAT ANCHOR
2) SW 7048 URBANE BRONZE
3) SW 6003 PROPER GRAY
4) DE6339 LEGENDARY GRAY
UUESTONE WALL VENEER
METRO CREAM HONED
LINEA V2 PLAN
LOT 12
LINE A V3 PLAN
LOT17
ROOF
FIBERTITE OFF•WHITE
LIMESTONE WALL VENEE R
SIBERIAN TUNORA HONED
Oil
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
"-~'..;HI [s~!~ • IN fk l •:)P. .
.. !IJII SAN ~AH O AVl. }ll Ml I ~ALM OUl~I CA gllW
!:!Q!il;.
THE COLORS SHOWN ARE SAMPLE COLORS
ANO TONES COU LD VARY IN THE FIELD.
FINAL SPEC IFICATION FOR STONE
CLADDING TO BE SELECTED BY THE
DEVELOPER OR BUYER.
FINAL SPECIFICATION FOR ENTRY DOOR
PAINT TO BE SELECTED BY THE DEVELOPER
OR BUYER.
FINAL SPECIFICATION FOR WINDOW &
SLIDER FRAMES TO BE SELECTED BY THE
DEVELOPER.
FINAL SPECIFICATION FOR EXTERIOR WALL
& FASCIA PAINT TO BE SELECTED BY THE
DEVELOPER OR BUYER.
COLOR ELEVATIONS &
MATERIAL BOARD
Scale : 12"•1'-0"
A002
§
5-
1 0
7 '~
LOT 18: PLAN H3
18,2 43SF I 0.419A C
j~ r,---1 " I Ii --;----
I
II --!M 1·
= 15,983SF /0 .367AC
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
11~~ 1Z~ ~:t!2V:c I VJ.:o~E;.=~E::.soo 1i.~;g
1!~~~t!c I H2-:o~E£i=~eif-soo
(g fl
-~------§ I . ---.-1
,t.W~~~~~~SL;c I L1-:o~e;.=~ez15
-600
@
1~'"t:2 ~~ ~~~s"!c J v2.:o~e;.=~e~-600
V PLANS
L PLANS
H PLANS
~ SE LECTED TYPICALS SHO'NN
WITHIN ENTITLEMENT SET
'I~ • f
= 16,148SF /0,371 AC
DI
~
18,159SF I 0.417AC
= 16,919SF I 0 .388AC
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD OVERALL SITE PLAN
; .' ::..: H I l E C 1 ~ • I N l l· I( I -~ F; ,.
44~Jll~ANM~l01,\tl,~llJOO I ~AI MUBlWI C ... ~1,1,.1 ·~· 1"=20'-0" She et: A100
$
0 z
~ g
LI.
~
§
"
5-
1 0
8 ~ELEVATIONS ON W EST SIDE
0 ;,~~~-1 ELEVATIONS ON EA ST SIDE
NOTE:
V1 , L2 , L3 ARE ADDITIONAL FACADES FOR PLANS LAND V
USED TO PRESENT VARIETY AND DIFFERENTIATION
WITHIN THE PROJECT
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA ~ PREST I V UKSIC I GREENWOO D ~-;;.: ~ i-i ! r E . ! ~ · I I J :': P. I C, ,> ::
◄-~)"-N ~AMIO AVl.,)ll.W I rMMIJl\UI CA Q/11,0
STREET ELEVATIONS
Si;:ale:
A200
~
E
5-
1 0
9 ~. ~Qjl ,· .~ L~CT I U<NI -
1) ~:-: ~_;CTION 1
11™□1□111 □a t,.,., , ... _
l,n!ii, ,. :::::;;:-.2... ,~·,, ~□. k
2 ) ~:-: ~_;CTION 2
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA FLF7
':1 6' 12 24' (mi
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
., ,, C Ii I EC f ~ • I r\ • !' '< I ~ I: f
Sc.Ila : J/32"=1'-0"
IN10.-,vc.o.1c 11urc 1\.C'lM II W 1/Y .».JI Sheet· A3QQ
SITE SECTIONS
5-
1 1
0 LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CA
LINEAL 1 PLAN
LOT 11
Iii
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
,;,,'CH1 1ECT: • IN';:i,:101:~
.. !>lO~A ... rAUOAVl. ~II JIIO I ~M.MOl~l~I CA Q}ll,O
L 1 LOT 11 MODEL
Scale: 112"•1'-0"
Sheet: L 1-000
5-
1 1
1 --1
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CA
;1~
MENTUNE
,--3 -----~I-"-"
I MAIN RESIPENCE
,!, hi I I · · l""lul I I F""4
~
I sr.s-!
I.
0----8 1·
q _ I
•_~al>
---L --
1 ' I
~ -~-f ·· r ''.·--~ / 1,
I
~Ii • l
Fl c=i LJ I
O' 4' 8' 16' 32' ~
□ SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
GATE. HEIGHT TO MATCH SITE WALLS
SITE WALLS 6' FROM FINISH GRADE
3. PROPERTY LINE
4. CONCRETE PAVERS
S. CONCRETE STAIRS I LANDING
STEPPING STONES
7. LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG
POOL
SPA
10. FIREPIT
11, CONDENSER
12. POOL EQUIPMENT
13. TANKLESS WATER HEATER
14. UTILITIES
15. OUTDOOR SHOWER
16. BBQ
17. CASITA
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD L 1 LOT 11 SITE PLAN
~ i;' C: t-1 I I r. C f !. • I N l !, ;,: l 0 t ~
H :.JllS!,.NrA~lOAVL~(l ..00 I ~AIMO(l,f~I CA '>l/40 &.alo: As indicated Sheet: L 1-100
5-
1 1
2 E7'
,.__,..,...,.__+----....---' -----~
•'~I~
~
G UEST HOUSE §]
CLOS. §I
G.H.BATH
§I ' _____ _.
JCAR GARAGE
El
?
,(,
I -----i-r------~---;..
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE [ii PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD L1 LOT11 ·' C ' I 1 E C ' • • 1 ' I e k I •C e C OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - RANCHO MIRAGE, CA ~ FlJ7 ' ' I I ""''"""0'"·'"=1•"""'"' ''""w '""' 1m·•1·-o-I~~ w O' 4' $' 16' 32' Hi.A ,•,1 .,., Iii • ,/.. She et· ~ N 1,.,11owfVCAIICHllCl~COM l/6'J /IY .»vl! L 1-200
5-
1 1
3 --------8
~I~
o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
-h-+!b ++ !---+ 1-~ •Ui ~ -~ J 'l . _I I \ .1 'l~ • I _, ¾ I Fl~LQO~ la V i.. :,, \ \ ' \FINISHGRAOE
FIREPLACE VENT ~ ELEVATIO N
-----El
\
\
L
~LE VATION
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CA FLF7 I
a r ~ ~ ,~
NOTES:
i
~I i lf
' ~
~
~-
~ISHFL.QO~
FINISH G RADE ~-
CEMENT PL.AS T ER W ITH LIGHT SANO
TEXTURE. PAINTED
3. W INOOW FRAME IN CLEAR OR DARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUMINUM
EGR ESSWlNDOW
5. ENTRY DOOR WI S1DELITE TO BE FIBERGLASS
SWING OR PIVOT
6 . POLYURETHANE JNSULA TEO GARAGE DOOR .
PAINTED
7. THERMALLY BROKEN SLIDING GLASS DOORS
8. ARCHITECTURAL STONE V ENEER. FINAL
SPEC. PER DEVELOPER (NOT APPLICABLE)
9. FINISH GRADE 6" BELOW FINISH FLOOR
10. EXTERIOR HOUSE NUMBER 6". BUT NO MORE
THAN 8" IN HEIGHT [RMMC SECTION
17.28.120(B)]
11. CONTROL JOINT
12. EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXTERIOR FRENCH DOOR WITH FROSTED
GLASS
14, PAINTED METAL COLUMN
15. PAINTED METAL LOUVERS (NOT APPLICABLE)
16. FIXED GLASS OVER STUCCO
17. VENTED MECHANICAL DOOR TO MATCH
EXTERIOR WALLS
HOUSES ARE COLORED. ELEVATIONS SHOW LIGHTER AND DARKER SHADING DUE TO VIEW DEPTH.
FINAL SPECI FICATION FOR EXTERIOR WALL , FASCIA PAI NT, DOOR COLOR , F RAME FI NISH & STONE CLADDING TO BE SELECTED BY THE DEVELOPER OR BUYER.
[ii PREST I V UKSIC I GR EENWOOD
-. le C H I l E ,~ l \. • I N ! C: K I ,;,; F: '
••~~AN~ll!I O A\lf.~ll ,'llU I l'AI MOl~~I CA ~l.'MJ
L 1 LOT 11
EXT. ELEVATIONS
Sheet: L 1-300
§
5-
1 1
4 ----8
I -I
-·-------
I --b I ,, .{ I { • t I I ~ "bd-~ FIN.Slj.fLOO~ ~
\ ,---, :.. \ r-, Z \ ,---, ' FINISHGRAOE
o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
~ ELEVATION
----El _l
t:....:ill~
~ELEVATI ON
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CA Fl___Fl I
---.. -,
,. FIREPLACE VENT
CEMENT PLASTER WITH LIGHT SAND
TEXTURE, PAINTED
WINDOW FRAME IN CLEAR OR DARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUMINUM
EGRESS WINDOW
s. ENTRY DOOR W / SIDELITE TO BE FIBERGLASS
SWING OR PIVOT
--------~-
NOTES:
I
•1: ~ g • ~
~
=LQO~
FINISH GRADE ---.. -.
7,
POLYURETHANE INSULATED GARAGE DOOR .
PAINTED
THERMALLY BROKEN SLIDING GLASS DOORS
8, ARCH ITECTURAL STONE VENEER. FINAL
SPEC. PER DEVELOPER (NOT APPLICABLE)
9. FINISH GRADE 6" BELOW FINISH FLOOR
10. EXTERIOR HOUSE NUMBER 6", BUT NO MORE
THAN 8" IN HEIGHT [RMMC SECTION
17.28.120(8)1
11, CONTROL JOINT
12. EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXTERIOR FRENCH DOOR WITH FROSTED
GLASS
14. PAINTED METAL COLUMN
15. PAINTED METAL LOUVERS (NOT APPLICABLE)
16. FlXEOGlASSOVERSTUCCO
17. VENTEOMECHANICALOOOR TO MATCH
EXTERIOR WALLS
HOUSES ARE COLORED. ELEVATIONS SHOW LIGHTER ANO DARKER SHADING DUE .TO VIEW DEPTH.
FINAL SPECIFICATION FOR EXTERIOR WALL. FASCIA PAINT. DOOR COLOR. FRAME FINIS H & STONE CLADDING TO BE SELECTED BY THE DEVELOPER OR BUYER.
~ PREST I VUKS IC I GR EEN WOOD
._ .-(.'. • I '-f !,; I ·.J t::,.
~H JU ~AN 1A6W AVI .M I JOO J l "ALM Dl.}fkl CA "IJI/J
L 1 LOT 11
EXT. ELEVATIONS
Seale: 114"•1'-0"
L 1-301
~
~
5-
1 1
5 □ 'f------------'\
~ EAST ELEVATION
~j/1/EST E_LJ;VAT IO N
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CA
I
.fl!ill,H_FL~ ~ ...
_Fll{!fil:LFl,__00~
FINIS H G RA DE ---... -
-+ --I. ! t J; I '__El!!J_SH_FLOO; ~
\ ' \ FINISH G RADE ---.. -. ~ NORTH ELEVATIO N
.-=;l;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;~;;;;;=~;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;/;;;;;~-i.::;:,I::::~ ---... -
0~~~~7:souTH RLEVATION
NOTES:
o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
FIREPLACE VENT
2. CEMENT PLASTER WITH LIGHT SANO
TEXTURE, PAINTED
3. WINDOW FRAME IN CLEAR OR DARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUMINUM
4. EGRESS WINDOW
5. ENTRY DOOR WI SIDELITE TO BE FIBERGLASS
SWING OR PIVOT
6. POLYURETHANE INSULATED GARAGE DOOR.
PAINTED
7. THERMALLY BROKEN SUOINGGI..ASS DOORS
8. ARCHITECTURAL STONE VENEER . FI NAL
SPEC. PER DEVELOPER (NOT APPLICABLE)
9 , FINISH GRADE 6" BELOW FINISH FLOOR
10. EXTER IOR HOUSE NUMBER 6", BUT NO MORE
THAN 8" IN HEIGHT [RMMC SECTION
17.28.120(8)}
11 . CONTROL JOINT
12 : EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXT ERIOR FRE NCH DOOR WITH FROS TED
GLASS
14, PAINT ED METAL COLUMN
15, PAINTED METAL LOUVERS (NOT APPLICABLE)
16. FIXED GLASS OVER STUCCO
17. VENTED MECHANICAL DOOR TO MATCH
EXTERIOR WALLS
HOUSES ARE COLORED. ELEVAT IONS SHOW LIGHTER ANO DARKER SHADING DUE TO VIEW DEPTH .
FLFl~~~
~ X ~ ~ 1~
FINAL SPECIFICATION FOR EXT ERIOR WALL. FASCIA PAINT. DOOR CO LOR . FRAME FINISH & STONE CLADDING TO BE SELECTED BY THE DEVELOPER OR BUYER .
Iii
PREST I VUKS IC I GR EENWOOD
;~Cf1ll[(."1~ • l!'.1Ei.:1(1r.~
••:..Jll~..._tl MII O .\Vl .~11 /00 t ~,\l M OUHI C>. •ul,D L1 LOT 11
CASITA ELEVATIONS
Sheel: L 1-302
~
E
5-
1 1
6 0-e
~1
E>· :j ,·· 10
~I•
0 ,
c---------?-----------------I
I I
I I
I I
: [°'-,...c•-1 I
I S I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I ! ____________________________ J
t}
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CA ~ FLFl
O' 4' a· 16' [;J
'~
NOTES:
□ ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES
45 MIL FIBERTITE-SM MEMBRANE (COLOR : OFF· .
WHITE). H-SHIELD CG HUNTER PANELS ENERGY
SMART POLYISO INSULATION BOARD (R•VALUE : 5.7).
ROOF ASSEMBLY TO HAVE CLASS "A" FIRE RATING .
2. CRICKET. TYP: SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT TO DRAIN, MIN .
ROOF DRAIN (OOWNSPOUT & OVERFLO\o\"J.
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW, TYPICAL.
5. GENERAL LOCATION OF PV INSTALLATION.
EXACT SIZE ANO LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED
BY DEVELOPER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
6. ROOF PARAPET. 15'-6" FROM FINISH FLOOR .
TYPICAL
PARAPET HEIGHT 15'-6" JS TYPICAL. REFER TO THE CALLOUTS WHERE THE PARAPE T . HEIGHT DIFERS FROM THE TYPICAL.
ALL HEIGHTS ARE MEASURED FROM THE FIN ISH FLOOR
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
,,i<('.H I f('l~ • INl~k l Of::
••UU~AN ~A~I O AVL ~II ,'00 I ~AlM O~L~I CA ~JiW
tr.10 .. rVGAVClllll C I\.COM j /(,IJ ,,.,.~ml
L 1 LOT 11
OVERALL ROOF PLAN
Seale-: As indicated
L 1-400
I
5-
1 1
7 ]
5555
• •
~l;_fl~PECTIVE
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CA Iii
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
-- I l f:_,._~ l : • I Is J ( R I ·°j F-: t
◄◄~lll!>AN r At(O Al/I . ~Tl ;o,)(l I !'Al~ ll!~t WI, C ... "ll60 L1 LOT 11
3D PERSPECTIVE
Scale·
L 1-500
~
~
5-
1 1
8 LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
LINEA V2 PLAN
LOT12
~ PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
,.,llc t :II E ;""•~ • I NT £:i<I OI':'~
"4~J.rl SAN ~A~I U A\ll, ~II .'llO I ~'-\M Df~f~I. CA Q}J61) 'cl/','•'•'''''/';,,,,,.,,,,
INI Oi!WIIGA~Cllti;C l~.COM I /Ml , //Y, ~:WJ I
V2 LOT 12 MODEL
Scale · 3132"=1'-0" §
Shoo< V2 -QQQ
5-
1 1
9 ' ~
'
~Ii
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA ® FLF7
0" 4' 8' 16'
.. _~ -_-_,-=,-
~ ~.
o ___ !",~+--__ o ____ -:-------~lJ
--~-----~--------
!
~ _ _J
"' ii
~
32' UJJ
o SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
GATE. HEIGHT TO MATCH SITE WALLS
2. SITE WALLS 6' FROM FINISH G RADE
3. PROPERTY LINE
CONCRETE PAV ERS
S. CONCRETE STAIRS I LAN DING
6. STEPPING STONES
7. LJNE OF ROOF OVERHANG
POOL
SPA
10. FIREPIT
11 . CONDENSER
12. POOL EQUIPMENT
13. TANKLESS WATER HEATER
14. UTILITIES
15. OUTDOOR SHOWER
16. BBC
17. CABANA
PREST I VU KSIC I G REEN W OO D V2 LOT 12 SITE PLAN
, ;: ::: 1-'I l I ::: ! : • I N T F R I (', f: ~
H.".."IO~AN rAIUJ ... Vi. ~II .-:)I.I J r ... LM Ol~I~! CA Q,160 Scala: As indicated V2-100
~
~
5-
1 2
0 (7 '
• ~I n
'I
'I
u
_j __________ _; ____ ,'\----L" -1--'° __ {_ ___ ,,~ J ==' ,, f O OUTOOORO ;=-j.-•-·---0 0 17~.;;; ~-..-11·-11·
LMNG I .. I
1ic.o-
DIN ING ROOM
8 2CAR GARAGE
8 t1
~
i
i
I
~
LIVING ROOM ~
1 CAR GARAGE ~
·~
LINEA RANCHO .MIRAGE Iii PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD V2LOT12 ' o C ,, I 1 E ., l \ ' ' N f < 1 O ' C OVERALL FLOOR PLAN S ~ RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA ~ fl----i7/ L I "~""''"0
'~'",;:':'.""_~•~:: ','~"= ::: ,,. .. ,.... Ii~
INI O .... VLAWl:fllllC I\.C'-lMl fl,/J fl'I !,3',1)1 V2 -200
5-
1 2
1 ,e,
13'.()"
m
i
0 ,. ...
,. ...
~A FLOOR PLAN ~
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORN IA
13'-Q"
.....
0 ~
;
s
;::
~
~
~ ·~
;
I
11h ;.
i
~A FRONT ELEVATION
I • ;1; ~ •
~A REAR ELEVATION
I
;lh •
i II
T,O,P.
CABANA KEYNOTES
2. 3,
'·
s. ,.
7 .
,.
_ FINISH£LOOR • ~
FINISH GRADE ---... -
_ FINIS!:! FLOQ~ iS ~ ...
CABANA SHADE STRUCTURE
PAINTED METAL COLUMNS
FIREPIT
BBQ
OUTDOOR SHOWER
CR ICKET
SCUPPER, TYP.
ROO F PARAPET 10'-0" FROM
FINISH FLOOR . TYP .
7 -~ :::±?' dl.. -t ~ .:J rlNIS~ FJo~
FINISH GRADE
~-
114
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
., ~CH I 1 l ;· ! \ • I !\. L is I.:, k:
H ~l ~AN ~AMlOAVl.~11 .100 J ~A!.M J)bl.111 CA QIJl,/J SQle :
Sheet:
V2 LOT 12
CABANA PLANS
As indic:atod
V2-300
I
5-
1 2
2 ~ ELEVATION
i
~ -□
@ ~~~-o-ELEVATION
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CALIFORNIA FLF7 I
O' 8' 1S-
;1 ~
~1~1
NOTES:
_
0 FINISH£LOO; ~
FINISH GRA~~
_FINISHFJ.~
FIN ISH GRADE ---.. -.
o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
'·
6 .
FIREPLACE VENT
CEMENT PLASTER W ITH LIGHT SANO
TEXTURE . PAINTED
WINDOW FRAME IN CLEAR OROARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUMINUM
EGRESS WINOOW
ENTRY OOOR WI SIOEUTE TO BE FIBERGLASS
SWING OR r1voT
POLYURETHANE INSUlATEDGARAGE DOOR
PAINTED
TH ER MALLY BROKEN SU DING GLASS DOORS
8. ARCH ITECTURAL STONE VENEER . FINAL
SPEC, PER DEVELOPER (NOT APPLICABLE)
9. FINISH GRADE 6" BELOW FINISH FLOOR
10. EXTERIOR HOUSE NUMBER 6", BUT NO MORE
THAN 8" IN HEIGHT [R.,-.MC SECTION
17.28.120(8)]
11. CONTROL JOINT
12. EXTER IOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXTERIOR FRENCH DOOR WITH FROSTED
GLASS (NOT APPLICABLE)
14. PAINTED METAL COLUMN
15. PAINTED METAL LOWERS
16. FIXED GLASS OVER STUCCO
17. V ENTED MECHANICAL DOOR TO MATCH
EXTERIOR WALLS
HOUSES ARE COLOR ED. ELEVATIONS SHOW LIGHTER AND DARKER SHADING DUE TO VIEW DEPTH.
FINAL SPECIFICATION FOR EXTERIOR WALL , FASCIA PAINT. DOOR COLOR, FRAME FINISH & STONE CLADDING TO BE SELECTED BY THE DEVELOPER OR BUYER .
[ii PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
., ,' C I 1 _, ;. • It-.. l i:' RI<;; P. :
UiJO~AN rA!lO,.,ll.~11 111b I rMt.lOL\.L~I CA ~U611
V2 LOT 12
EXT. ELEVATIONS
Scale : 114•,.1·-o·
Sheet· V2-400
I
5-
1 2
3 -----------8
.::..;.;..:::i
~ ELEVATION
·-----El
cin1 -I _ff
11 ljn n
!I
~ ELEVATI ON
LINEA RANCHO MI RAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFOR N IA FLF7 I
~ • ~ ,~ Jr
NOTES:
~I~
I
·1' ~I,~
__ FJ!:!.§!::!.F.J.00~ ~ FI NIS H GRA'?s~ ~
-=SHfL~
FINISH GRADE ...
o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
FIREPLACE VENT
CEMENT PLASTER WITH LIGHT SAND
TEXTUR E. PAINTED
3. WINDOW FRAME IN C LEAR OR DARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUMINUM
4. EGRESS W INDOW
5. ENTRY DOOR WI SIOEUTE TO BE FIBERGLASS
SII\IING OR PIVOT
6. POL YURETKANE INSULATED GARAG E DOOR
PAINTED
7. THERM.All Y BROKEN SLIDING GLASS DOORS
8. ARCHITECTURAL STONE VENEER. FINAL
SPEC. PER DEVELOPER (NOT APPLICABLE)
9. FINISH GRADE s• BELOW FINISH FLOOR
10. EXTERIOR HOUSE NUMBER s•, BUT NO l.10RE
THAN 8" IN HEIGHT [RMMC SECTION
17.2.8.120(8)]
11. CON TROL JOINT
12.. EXTER IOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXTERIOR FRENCH DOOR WITH FROSTED
GLASS (NOT APPLICABLE)
14, PAINTED METAL COLUMN
15, PAINTE D M ETAL LOUVERS
16. FIXED GLASS OVER STUCCO
17. VENTED MECHANICAL EXlOR TO MATCH
EXTERIOR WALLS
HOUSES ARE COLORED. ELEVATIONS SHOW LIGHTER ANO DARKER SHADI NG DUE TO VIEW DEPTH.
F INAL SPECIFICATION FOR EXTERIOR WALL. FA SCIA PA INT. DOOR COLO R, FRAME FI NIS H & STONE CLADDI NG TO BE SELECTED BY THE DEVELOPER OR BUYER .
~ PR EST I VUKS IC I GREE N WOO D
.,:,,'~H l lEC!: • 1Nl!.k 1 0!-:~
HiJO)>,tl~>,~10-"Vl.)llJOO l ~-"!MlllM~f C>,Qu61l
INIO.~VG>,i!t.:lllllt.:(';.t::OM J l.U . II'/ )3'i3 I
V2 LOT 12
EXT. ELEVAT IONS
S<:ale : 114"•1'-0"
Sheet· V2 -401
lg
~
5-
1 2
4 €,
~
T,O,E,1('-6"0
~1 -
E),
;----0 ---~r--r _____ :
______ j ______ ij 0 : --------~
~1 •
B
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA ~ Fl::Fl I
O' 4' 8' ~
,€)
□ ROOF PLAN
KEYNOTES
45 MIL FIBERTITE•SM MEMBRANE (COLOR: OFF.
WHITE). H-SHIELO CG HUNTER PANELS ENERGY
SMART POLYISO INSULATION BOARD (R-VALUE: S.7).
ROOF ASSEMBLY TO HAVE CLASS "A" FIRE RATING.
2. CRICKET. TYPICAL .
3. ROOF ORAIN {DOWNSPOUT & OVERFL~.
4. LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOYII. TYPICAL
S. GENERAL LOCATION OF PV INSTALLATION.
EXACT SIZE ANO LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED
BY DEVELOPER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
6. ROOF PARAPET 12'-6" FROM FINISH FLOOR.
TYPICAL.
NOTES :
PARAPET HEIGHT 12•~• IS TYPICAL. REFER TO THE CALLOUTS WHERE THE PARAPET HEIGHT OIFERS FROM THE TYPICAL.
ALL HEIGHTS ARE MEASURED FROM THE FINISH FLOOR
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
a? CH I l EC 1 • • I -.J t f R ! 0:j
◄<HO~AN ~AH O AVl ,}11 i'OO I ~A!MIILJ,UI CA ~uw
V2 LOT 12
OVERALL ROOF PLAN
Scal9:
Sheet" V2 -500
§
5-
1 2
5 -j
SSS5
G)3D PERSPECTIVE
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA Iii
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
a ,' C H I 1 ! • I "-1 { k I .;:; ' ~
_ .. ;,JoV,N rA~l O AVl.>11 IOO I ~Al"'ll!>HI CA ~J,IIJ V2 LOT 12
30 PERSPECTIVE
Scalo:
V2-600
I
5-
1 2
6 LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CALIFORNIA
LINEA H2 PLAN
LOT16
~ PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWO OD H2 LOT 16 MODEL
;; H I i E C 1 • I N l i: ;,: I ,;_; f: ~
U)JO~AtHl,llU AVl.~11 ""° I PAtM Dl~IIU. CA <>1141) Seale: I s,.,, H2 -0 00
5-
1 2
7 ~Ii
-0
II! II I"
11----~--111---114
11 J " I I~
1 ?111 "J I ~ r-==r -I·-=-
. fl -~ ~
~Ji •
"-·-J -------------~
o SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
CATE. HElciHT TO MATCH SITE WALLS
,. SITE WALLS 6' FROM FINISH GRADE
,. PROPERTY LINE
CONCRETE PAVERS
'· CONCRETE STA IRS I LANDING
6. STEPPING STONES
,. LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG
,. POOL
'· SPA
10, FIR EPIT
11. CONDENSER
12. POOL EQUIPMENT
13. TANl I ~A~lOAVl.~11 JOO I rAlM Jl!)IH CA "ll6fJ Scalo: As indieated Shut: H2 -100
I
5-
1 2
8 E;)
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
~1 i
~ g
'' ''
MASTER
BEDROOM ~
OFFICE ~
~
e
B"
FLFl ~ /4 I
~ • ~ 1s rr IJJ
,e
PREST I VUKSIC I G REENWOOD
·A ~' C /'I I l E -~ l : • I N 1 I: f.' I O f: ~
·•~3(1 ~AN ~A~IO >,\If_, ~u ,'(1(1 t rA(M nl~ ~I CA ~uw INI OWfVLAWCUl!tC l~.l:OM I /.0 //Y . ~3Vl I
H2 LOT 16
OVERALL FLOOR PLAN
Scale-:
H2-200
I
5-
1 2
9 ~ELE_V/\_TION
,I -
~
~LE VATION
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CALIFORNIA FlFl I .. .,
--G
' t!!!
~H FL.90~ ~ ~-
o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
FIREPLAC E VENT
CEMENT PLASTER WITH LIGHT SANO
TEXTURE. PAINTED
J. WINDOW FRAME IN CLEAR OR DARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUMINUM
EGRESS W INDOW
5. ENTRY DOOR WI SIDELITE TO BE FIBERGLASS
SWING OR PIVOT
,. POLYURETHANE INSULATED GARAGE DOOR , ~ 7.
PAINTED
TH ER MALLY BROKEN SLIDING GLASS DOORS
ARCHITECTURAL STONE VENEER. FINAL
SPEC. PER DEVELOPER
FINISH GRADE 6" BE LOW FINISH FLOOR
"-EXTERIOR HOUSE NUMBER 6", BUT NO MOR E
THAN a• IN HEIGHT {RMMC SECTION
17 .28.120(6)]
T 11. CONTROL JOINT
~n 12. EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXTERIOR FRENCH DOOR WITH FROSTED
GLASS (NOT APPLICABLE)
"-PAINTED METAL COLUMN (NOT APPLICABLE)
15. PAINTED METAL LOUVERS (NOT APPLICABLE)
fN ISH FL.QO~ 16. FIXED GLASS OVER STUCCO
~ FINISH GRA'?s~ ~ 17. VENTED MECHANICAL DOOR TO MATCH
EXTERIOR WALLS (NOT APPLICABLE)
NOTES:
HOUSES ARE COLORED, ELEVATIONS SHOW LIGHTER ANO DARKER SHADING DUE TO VIEW DEPTH.
FINAL SPECIFICATION FOR EXTE RIOR WALL , FASCIA PAINT, DOOR COLOR, FRAl/lE FINISH & STONE CLADDI NG TO BE SELECTED BY THE DEVELOPER OR BUYER.
PENDI NG STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT , FINAL HEIGHTS MAY IN CREAS E+/• 6' BUT IN NO CASES TO EXCEED 17.0- FROM FROM FINISH GRADE.
HI
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
, _, C I 1 E -,-:-I ~ • 1 '-I ! r r;: 1 ,:; f: ~
«~V.NrA¥l U AVl.)ff .ltltl I ~AIM OU.!.H CA <>n'°
lto o ... PVCAKCIMUCt\.COM I /MJ /IY )3'131
H2 LOT 16
EXT. ELEVATIONS
Sa>•·
Sheet: H2-300
~
~
5-
1 3
0 -----8
g1 ~ 7 '---~_j
~ ELEVATION
□
t~
_________ -! ___._.. _Flli!§J:iF,b~
FINISH GRADE
o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
FIREPLACE VENT
CEMENT PLASTER W ITH LIGHT SAND
TEXTURE. PA INTED
3. WINDOW FRAME IN CLEAR OR DARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUMINUM
5. ENTRY DOOR W/ SIOEL ITE TO BE FIBERGLASS
SWING OR PIVOT
6. POLYURETHANE INSULATED GARAG E DOOR ,
PAINTED
TH ERMA.LL Y BROKEN SLIDING GLASS OOORS
8. ARCHITECTURAL STONE VENE ER . FINAL
SPEC . PER DEVELOPER
9. FINISH GRADE 6" BELOW FINISH FLOOR
10. EXTERIOR HOUSE NUMBER 6", BUT NO MORE
THAN 8" IN HEIGHT {RMMC SECTION
17.28.120(6 )]
11 . CONTROL JOINT
12. EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE
13 . EXTERIOR FRENCH OOOR WITH FROSTED
GLASS (NOT APPLICABLE)
14. PAINTED METAL COLUMN (NOT APPLICABLE)
15. PAINTED METAL LOUVERS (NOT APPLICABLE)
16. FtXEO GLASS OVER STUCCO
17. V ENTED MECHANICAL DOOR TO MATCH
EXTERIOR WALLS (NOT APPLICABLE) ~----I FINISHF~
~ELEVATI ON
LINEA RANCHO M IRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CALIFORN IA FlF7 I .. .
FINISH GRADE ---~--
NOTES;
HOUSES ARE COLORED, ELEVATIONS SHOW LIGHTER AND DARKER SHADING DUE TO VIEW DEPTH.
FINA L SPECIFICATION FOR EXTERIOR WALL. FASCIA PAINT, DOOR COLOR, FRAME FINISH & STONE CLADDI NG TO 6E SELECTED BY THE DEVELOPER OR BUYER.
PENDING S TRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT, FINAL HEIGHTS MAY INCREASE+/-6" BUT IN NO CASES TO EXCEED 17'-0" FROM FROM FINISH GRADE.
Iii
PREST I VUKS IC I GREENWOOD
; :.'.;.: ii I I F (' l • I N f: f,: I..-,;_, f: ~
U.>Jl)~"NPM!OAV!.lllJOU I PAlMU!MH CA ~1.1611
INfO<!'PVGA~Cllllt C IH ;OM I hlJ , IIY ~:t,J I
H2 LOT 16
EXT ELEVATIONS
Sc.ile: 114"•1'-0"
H2-301
5-
1 3
1 E,,
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
e
r-~ -----------------
: ·] ~ --ii
: i ~----2---------·1 ~ i : : ----,~
:------G I 5 : "
L____ I -------I _____ J
I I r--------'T"" ~ i ----=_---r ---~
I !j I ;---M-------' I j i ' , __________________ ; ~
I "
',
, ' , '
I
:1i1 L--------------------------
_. ;~ _________ _J
.e
~ Fl:F7 I
O' 4' 8' 16' ~
,€)
□ ROOF PLAN
KE YN OTES
45 MIL FIBERTITE-SM MEMBRANE (COLOR : OFF-
WHITEJ. H-SHIELO CG HUNTER PANELS ENERGY
SMART F'OLYISO INSULATION BOARO (R•VALUE : 5.7}.
ROOF ASSEMBLY TO HAVE CLASS "A" FIRE RATING.
2. CRICKET. TYPICAL.
3. ROOF DRAIN {OOWNSPOUT & OVERFLOW).
4. LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW, TYPICAL.
5. GENERAL LOCATION OF PV INSTALLATION.
EXACT SIZE ANO LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED
BY DEVELOPER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
6. ROOF PARAPET 13'•2" FROM FINISH FlOOR,
TYPICAL.
NOTES:
PARAPET HEIGH T 13'-2" IS TYPICAL. REFER TO THE CALLOUT$ WHERE THE PARAPET HEIGHT OIFERS FROM THE TYPICAL.
ALL HEIGHTS ARE MEASURED FROM THE FINISH FLOOR
PREST I VUKS IC I GREE NWOO D
, K C 1-1 I 1 (' ! . · Ii,., l f.: I r_;;
H~~A N ~A~I O AVI, ~It JOO I Pi\lMoti>f~! CA ~U/,0
H2 LOT 16
OVERALL ROOF PLAN
Si:ale : Asindic:atad
Sheet: H2-400
~
~
5-
1 3
2 W Q_p_ERSPECTIVE
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CALIFORNIA liJJ
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
-'-:,, C 11 I l -~ t '. • I r-.. l ! ~ I :, ,: ~
U:.JIJMN~M lOAYl .• ~ll/Olll~AIMDf:}i·~I CA ~06()
H2 LOT 16
30 PERSPECTIVE
Scale ·
Sheet: H2 -500
~
~
5-
1 3
3 LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CALIFORNIA
LINEA V3 PLAN
LOT17
HI
PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
,ll S.:H l l[,~l~ • IN1Fk'1 1.:,R~
••~ ~AN ~A~I O A~, ~u,:,.'. ~-:l.:.:l~:::, ,Cl~-~~/~
INl o .. rVt;AWCIUHCI\.COM 11.U. IN »,IJ 1
V3 LOT 17 MODEL
Scale· 3116",.1'-0" §
s..... V3-000
5-
1 3
4 12
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CALIFORNIA
MAIN RESIDENCE
~I: I ___ _
I
I
I
I 1~ [ 8\ ·f ~--Er , H·i © g-E]
Ii I I! 111
--~~ -. __ B@ _____ ~-----0
I
~•-.5•
o SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
. GATE. HEIGHT TO MATCH SI TE WALLS
SITE WALLS 6' FROM FINISH GRADE
,. PROPERTY LINE
4. CONCRE TE PAVE RS
s. CONCRETE STAIRS I LANDING
,. STEPPING STONES
.==....;r---------,. LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG •. POOL ,. SPA
10. FIREPIT
~11
11. CONDENSER
12. POOL EQU IPMENT
;11
~ 13. TANKLESS WATER HEATER
14. UTILITIES
·•=----=----~ . ' -
15. OUTDOOR SHOWER
16. 880
~ FLF7 I .. -114
PREST I VU KSIC I G RE ENWO OD
.\ ,, C: l·I I E ,~.-r ~ • I N r E I< I ,:: r. :·
◄4i:lll~ .... rAH O AVl. ~II ,'\JI] I rA!Mnt~l~I CA -u/JO V3 LOT 17 SITE PLAN
Scale: /uindicatad
Sheet: V3 -100
5-
1 3
5 ~
1 y 1,·.o-
~-------rr1 ~~I
-L11 :! c 1H e ·
~
POOL CABANA §] ;ll~
~I~
~
1' ~!;~
1: §[
1:
i:
1t: f
MASTER SUITE
B 11-----i,
~-.i;-~
-'1---
0 '
"
~
== 0
-
0 ----,------l-!
23•.11 :,1· ••.r ::,i~ir.-1r .1i,r, 1:r-Q· ,
EO ll"-ll/j" &'-6" s.r S"-€" r.o-::21~
'1-'----::-=---:-=--~-~1 ----::-=---,:-:,---,.,,;,-----,~=t------1,-----,.--,.~~ l
1 ~
ii i LIVING ROOM ~~ DINING ROOM
~ ~ ~
~
GUEST SUITE
§J ~
!1;
II OA&J'
i1: ... r,r
LINEA RANCHO Ml ~ PRESTIVUKSIC IGREE NWOOD V3LOT17 RAGE .,,·c H,,c,·,, · 'N 1 '''''"' OVERALL FLOOR PLAN •~ RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA ~ fl---f7. L I "~""""°'~'",'.:,.'.'.~"""':: ":"~ =~.. ,,. .. ,.... I~§ ltlt0.rt'VGA~Ct1111Cf\.COMl/61J /IY !,Ml V3-200
5-
1 3
6 11 I ~ -----EJ
~ ELEV6TION
@ ~~~..-ELEVATION
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CALIFORNIA Fl::F7 I . ,.
~I~
NOTES:
~S.!:jFLOO; ~
FINI SH GRA~~ ~
i.,I ~
0 o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
'· FIREPLACE VENT
,: CEMENT PLASTER WITH LIGHT SANO
TEXTURE . PAINTED
3. WINDOW FRAME IN CLEAR OR DARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUMINUM
EGRESS WINDOW
5. ENTRY DOOR WI SIDELITE TO BE FIBERGLASS
SWING OR PIVOT
6. POLYURETHANE INSULATED GARAGE DOOR .
PAINTED
THERIAALL Y BROKEN SLIDING GLASS DOORS
,. ARCHITECTURAL STONE VENEER. FINAL
SPEC. PER DEVELOPER
,. FINISH GRADE 6" BELOW FINISH FLOOR
10. EXTERIOR HOUSE NUMBER 6", BUT NO MORE
THAN 8" IN HEIGHT {RMMC SECTION
17.28.120(9)]
11. CONTROL JOINT
12. EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXTERIOR FRENCH DOOR WITH FROSTED
GLASS (NOT APPLICABLE)
14. PAINTEDMETALCOLUMN
15. PAINTED METAL LOUVERS
16. FIXED GLASS OVER STUCCO
17. VENTED MECHANICAL DOOR
...E!fil?H_FLOO; ~ ;:ISHGRA~
HOUSES A RE COLORED, ELEVATIONS S HOW LIGH TER AND DARKER SHADING DUE TO VIEW DEPTH.
FINAL SPECIFICATION FOR EXTERIOR WALL. FASCIA PAINT, DOOR COLOR, FRAME FINISH & STONE CLADDING TO BE SELECTE D BY THE DEVELOPER OR B UY ER .
~ PREST I VUKSIC I GREENWOOD
1•'C:HI l-C";~. • IN ~S:10P.
H~llHAN ~ ... lllU ... vr, oil ,00 I ~ ... lMOl~ll,'! c ... ~n"-1 V3 LOT 17
EXT. ELEVATIONS
Scale: 114•a 1'--0"
V3 -300
5-
1 3
7 --8
;,I~ .
_ FI NIS !:!, FLOOR.ti,
FINISH G RAOE ---.. -.
o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
FIREPLACE VENT
CEMENT PLASTER W ITH LIGHT SANO
TEXTURE. PAINTED ~ ELE VATION
3 · ::'!~~~6:~~~l~U~LEAROR DARK BRONZE
EGRESS WINDOW
5 . ENTRY DOOR WI SIDELITE TO BE FIBERGLASS
SWING OR PIVOT
-El
t -. -][
6. POLYURETHANE INSULATED GARAGE DOOR.
PAINTED
THERM.ALLY BROKEN SLI DING GLASS DOORS
8. ARCHITECTURAL STONE VENEER , FINAL
SPEC. PER DEVELOPER
9. FINISH GRADE 6" BELOW FINISH FLOOR
10. EXTERIOR HOUSE NUMBER 6", BUT NO MORE
T HAN 8" IN HEIGHT (RMMC SECTION
17.28.120(6)]
11. CONTROL JOINT
12, EXTER IOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXTERIOR FRENCH DOOR W ITH FROSTED
GLASS (NOT APPLICABLE)
14. PAINTED M ETAL COLUMN
15. PA INTED METAL LOUVERS
16. FIXED GLASS OVER STUCCO
17. VENTED MECHANICAL DOO R
I I ~ , d u ,~ a.J-l l ~-• >'. l I ~~ -FINISH ~L~ t l ,% • \ ~ 1 \ \ zli \ \ \ t :.~
~ELEVATI ON
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE , CALIFORNIA R:F7~-~
O' 2' 4' 8' 16'
NO TE S;
HOUSES ARE COLORED. ELEVATIONS SHOW LIGHTER ANO DARKER SHADING DUE TO VIEW DEPTH.
FINAL SPECIFICATION FOR EXTERIOR WALL. FASCIA PAINT. OOOR COLOR. FRAME FINISH & STONE C lADOING TO BE SELECTED BY THE DEVELOPER OR BUYER .
(JI PREST I V UKSIC I GREE NWO O D
, 1,/ C :-t I l ·1: 1 ~ • I r,; ' [ I( I ,;;, I'; ;;
••~Jll>A hltM !O AYl.>11 JO(I I ~AIM DrnH CA "Noll
lhltowrv0 ... wc 1nn c 1i.COM I l oll 11y ~JYJ 1
V3 LOT 17
EXT. ELEVATIONS
Scale : 1/4" ~ 1'-0"
V3 -301
~
~
5-
1 3
8 i::::.;J;;b.;::;::~;::;::;;;:;::;::;::;::;::;::!;;;:~;::;::;;::;::;::;::;::;::;::;;;;!;~-;;;FINISH FL.QO~ FINISH GRA~~
~ NORTH ELEVAT ION
I
i ii •
::;;::;:::l::!;::;:::::l;:;::;::;::;::;::;::;::;::!::::=;:j;:;;;~=;::;::;::;::;::;::;::;::~~F~IN:::ISH~~ FJNl§HGRAOE ...
0 ~~~~:_~ SO UTH ELEVATI ON
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
! .
11; • ~
~
\ t ::;_t::-====f-~S !:!_FLOO; ~
t=: i FINISH GRADE ---... -
~ EAS T ELE VATION
t FINISH Ft,_00~ ~ ;t::: C '-FINISH GRADE ---.. -.
~ WEST ELEVATION
o EXTERIOR ELEVATION
KEYNOTES
FIREPLACE VENT
2 . CEMENT PLASTER IMTH LIGHT SANO
TEXTURE . PAINTED DEW340 "Wl-llSPER"
3. WINDOW FRAM E IN CLEAR OR DARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUM INUM
4, EGRESS WINDOW
5. ENTRY DOOR WI SIOELITE TO BE FlSERGLASS
SWING OR PIVOT
6, POLYURETHAN E INSULATED GARAGE DOOR
PAINTED OEW340 'WH ISPER• OR OEC786
"MINER'S OUST"
7. THERMALLY BROK EN SLID ING GLASS DOORS
8. ARCHITECTURAL STONE VENEER, FINAL
SPEC. PER DEVELOPER
9, FINISH GRADE 6" BELOW FIN ISH FLOOR
10. AUTOMATICALLY ILLUMINATED EXTER IOR
HOUSE NUMBER s·. BUT NO MORE THAN a· IN
HEIGHT [RMMC SECTION 17.28.120(B)J
11. CONTROLJOINT
12. EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE
13. EXTERIOR FRENCH DOOR WITH FROSTED
GLASS (N OT APPLICABLE) "
14. PAINTED M ETAL COLUMN
15. PAINTED METAL LOUVERS
16. FIXED GLASS OVER STUCCO
17. VENTED MECHANICAL DOOR
Iii
PREST I V UKSI C I G REENW OO D V3 LOT 17
CASITA ELEVATIONS Fl C:::J LJ I
O' 2' 4' 8' 16'
11~.:· • 11'..liCi l~/IIIOA\11 .)1//00 (t Al M Ol)H l CJ\"lit/J Scale: 114"•N)" Sheet: V3-302
I
5-
1 3
9 LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA @
€,
E>·
!] ~----r-----~
, I , L ______________________ J
~1 l!;
~1 '
FLF7 . . I
O' 4' a· 16'
0 !]
~
,()
'~
NOTES :
o ROOF PLAN
KEYNOTES
45 MIL FIB ERTI TE-SM MEMBRANE (CO LOR : OFF,
WH ITE). H-SHIELD CG HUNTER PANELS ENERGY
SMART POLYISO INSULATION BOAR D (R-VALUE: 5.7).
ROOF ASSEMBLY TO HAVE CLASS 'A" FIRE RAT ING.
2. CRICKET. TYPICAL
J . ROOF DRAIN (OOWNSPOUT & OVERFLOW).
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW. TYPICAL
5. GENERAL LOCATION OF PV INSTALLATION.
EXACT SIZE ANO LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED
BY DEVELOPER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
6. ROOF PARAPET 12'-6" FROM FINISH FLOOR ,
TYPICAL.
PARAPET HEIGHT 12'-6" IS TYPICAL. REFER TO TH E CALLOUTS WHERE THE PARAPET HE IGHT DIFERS FROM·THE TYPICAL.
ALL HE IGHTS ARE MEASURED FROM TH E FINISH FLOOR
PREST I VU KSIC I G REENWOO D
!< -.: ii I 1 I; C ! ~ • I N 1 le k I -:i f; S
••~.lllV,N fAH O AV!. ~II JOU I PA!M OLM~I CA ~UIAJ
V3 LOT 17
OVERALL ROOF PLAN
Asindic:ated
Sheet· V3-400
§
5-
1 4
0 ~SPECTI V E
LINEA RANCHO MIRAGE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA ~ PREST I V UK SIC I G REEN WOO D ~ _, C: I 1 • l :-.. ! f k I ,:., " ~
••Ul~ANrMtU"VL~n :ioo 1rAIM(lll,lkl Dl""tJf'J
V3 LOT 17
30 PERSPECTIVE
Sc.i lo :
V3-500
I
5-
1 4
1 ~ MSA CONSULTING, INC.
Landscape Architecture • Civil Engineering • Land Surveying Planning • Envi ro nme nta l Services • Dry Ut il ity Coordinat ion • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Ranc ho Mirage, CA 92270 I 760.320.9811 I MSAConsulti nginc.com INDEX:
OVERALL PROJECT KEY MAP
CONSTRUCTION PLAN
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
IRRIGATI ON PLAN
IRRIGA TION DETAILS
PLANTING & LIGH TING PLA N
PLANTING DETAILS
LIGHTING DETA ILS
VICINITY MAP :
i CA.THEO AL CHY 'I en • o,
V DINAH SHORE 01?1\l'E
~I ml
~
·111 t i~ n ->-
0 °' f-------------~----------------i IOf~l!l[I
®:===:11
::::N~:::/11
11 £ IXP A"5IOMJQJ,IT
HOR
MIGN
"' ' ' .
" ,o .,
MN
co,
'"
II.ADU IOAID NOi REC EIVED. PLEA.SE CONTA C T THE lANOSCME A.tc11nec1 OF 0:::
E;~:::;:Nci, >-~-:-::-::-:-:-:
0 -~c-'·-~-LA-N_D_sc_A_PE---- W.!N5IONINC
• -Olli!CllONOfSIOrl ,:r;MIN.O NHAIOSCA~t e ll(VA!ION O!IAI . " '" CO OII
"' ,~ ,.,
"' ,.
~[ ~~:~~R:, ~ gg~~~~~g§;~~~g ~ ~
51Mllll l~-----~I ======-LJ.JLJ.J
~f;~[~~~,!;~~~lA!Hl Mt Cc°:~;~~t~!l~Ofn~. 0-.. ---WAll l_,.A(;IMl,.ID!~AIIMI MI a 0 IIO M U~ ... OJACt Nll~UCIAD!) All Rights Rcs e Ned ~ DlvtlCP .... NI M.IYICUDIPAll""I.NI ~ ~
5-
1 4
2 SHEETS
L• I .00 CONSTRUCTION SHEET
L•J.OOIRRIGATION SHEET
L-5 .00 PLANT IN G&. LIGH TIN G SHEET
GINGER ROGERS RD
_l_ I_:
NOT IN SC®PE
OF WOR-K
~ \ '
_.:----
NOT 11',J SCOPE
OFWORK I
c=i·
...,.1,;c-;
,23 ~, --7J, --r--
1 r."L7 I I r n ---~lt=i7
!~~:~~: ! I : 1 !Bt;-4'.=1 I
I l _ = I I ~ I , ""
I_,-'° 7 .-~ .. ,~~fl., I I , 'u r,,._ ,. i 1 L-1.02co,~~~~T~~E~ SHEET I -I . 1t -I I l -3.02 IRR &. LIGHTING ' -J ~ ~-~ I ', .I j >-.L ---l-S,02 PlANTING ---7 -I I O .P£"!'.Ir I I TiillJ r'-·· 0 r--'
I .l b 'i )~ ·'-:-, 1-I I I ' :;:: I O ! 0
I _, ' ~' -:-,, I I "7-c-'IF I ' I_
SHEETS:
I 17f~I ~~4-µ I\ ·HhL l;;i· _, I P\;S-l.J,___;_ ---,-,, 00 -, .JJJJ . j:;_ 'J.+_. I ...J ___ I '''l,1-, --~ r ..=.,-o-J D' i I I 111 ~.J F-lit! 1 1n , j 1 ±=--=-=~~ -:fe1~,. ·f/H I r / G r LfJ:i. "}
""~ f '....~rl-II · ··· ' -I N '--" SO-' ' ,_
' --· '"-II I I ·-"'"· ___ 11 -_JI _o r . J"_ 1 / ~ 1
1 1 I 1. ___
1 ~:::i:;;~';;~~g~\':;~,NGS -u w
:.L 0...
~ >- -~
_J I-0
_J ZI
LL°"
0 <:( w z
_J
lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT :
PROJECT MANAGER: OR
DRAWN: 01!
CHECKED: Ml/TM
PROJ.NO. 2776
DATE: 11/10/22
SCALE: l".:30·,e-
REVISIONS: l 1N1T
1 CITY SUBMITTAL 11 JO 22 OR
CITY COMMENTS &
RESUBMITTAL 01/05/23 _Q~
s
SHEET f',():
L-0.00
5-
1 4
3 CONTINGENCY NOTE:
~EYNOTES
CD CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO BE N,t,TURAL COLORED
CONCRETE WIIKSANO RNISl1. IHICICNESS 10 BE PER
CITY STAhOARD OR PER SOILS ENGINEER. SEE PLAN
FOR SCORE JOINT PATTERN.
@ 3' SQUARE POUR IN PLACE CONCli!ETE STEPP!NG
PADS. CONCRETE TO BE NATURAL COLORED WITH
SANO FINISH 10 MATCH DRIVEWAY. THIC KNESS TO BE
PER CITY STANDARD OR PH SOI.S ENGINEER
@ CONCRETE SlEPS. CONCRETE TO BE NAIURAL COLOR
WIIHSANDflNISHSEEDET ... ll8,SHEETL•2.00.
@ CMU WALL BV ARCHITECT. SEE ARCl1TECIURAL PLANS
fOR OET,\lS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL CONTROL.
@ PEOESIRIANGAIE. SEE Al!Cl,llfCTURAL PLANS FOR
DHAIU. SPECIFICATIONS ANO VERTICAl/HORllONTAl
CONTROL
@ UIIJTY PeR MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL Ar,,()
PLUMBt-lC.
~~···
l I ~LAVIA COURl]SOUTH
--,--
CONCRETE FOOTING/ FlATWORK NOTES:
STANDARD:
~ ~
~ESHALL BE 2.500 PSI (MIN .) TYPE-2 PORTLAND CEMENT UNLESS OTHERW5E DIRECTED 8YS01LS l!EPORT. PLACE REINFORCING STEELJ' FROM BOTTOM AND 2• Fl!OM80TH ENDS IMINJ. SEE PLAN FOR STEEL SIZE. QUANTITY AND LOCATION UNLESS OTHERW5E DIRECTED BY SOILS REPORT
CONCRETE IN HOT SOIL:
-ALL CONCRETE PLACED IN CONTACT WITH HOT SOIL. DEFINED AS SOIL WITH A PH OF 7 OR HIGHER. W!LL CONFORM TO ASTM C l Dl2-95 AND CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING MIX PARAMETERS: TYPE 5 PORTLAND CEMENT WITH A .35 WATER/ CEMENT RATIO:
ASTM CLASS F FLY ASH !:ZO PERCENT VOLUMETRIC REPLACEMENT): SUPEl!PlASTICllEI! ADMIXlURE 110-ISFL.OZ. PER 100 La.5 OF CEMENT) UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY
SOILS REPORT
-CONCRETE SHAU HAVE ACCELEl!ATEO CURING AND SHALL ATTAIN A MINIMUM STRENGTH OF 4.SCO PSL THE TYPES PORTLAND CEMENT SHALL BE CEIHIFIED AS HAVING LESS THAN Jl,TRI-CALCIUM ALUMINA TE UNLESS OTHEIIWISE DIRECTED BY SOllSREPORT
HAIIDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES
-CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCl-fTECT TO REVIEW HARDSCAPE LAYOUT PRIOR TO FORMING FOR FLATWORI(.
-ALL CONCRETE SHALL !E .o47 WA TEI!/ CEMENT RATIO. o4.txXl p1i. 6 1 /2 SACK MDI.
TYPE HPOl!TLAND CEMENT
IONLY INSOILS WITH HIGH ALKALINE OR SALT CONTENT).
-ALL CONCRETE COLORS TO BE CONFIRMED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN AELD PRIOR TO POURING WITH SAMPLE PANELS PER SPECIFICATIONS. -INCLUDE PENETRATING SEALER ON ALL SITE CONCl<ETE AND PAVEl<S. I MATTE FINISH UNLESS OTHEl!WISESPECIAED. I
-PARKING, ROAD LAYOUT AND DRIVEWAYS BY OTHERS.
-ADA ACCESSIBILITY ANALYSIS, COMPLIANCE AND DESIGN BY OTHERS, I SHOWN HERE FOi! REFERENCE ONLY).
-LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST FIELD REVIEW FLATWORK LOCAHONS PRIOR TO
CO NCRETEBEING POURED
• ALL GRAD!NG AND DRAINAGE DESIGN ON FLATWORK BY CIVIL ENGINEER LJ'!ILITYEASEMENTNOTE·
=-=--1 I ---~----~---
' ;
---~-\-~---I I C,
I I
-'i'-~---~--
'
ri z :::,
I
I~
\_J
..;, m~~ci::f sET~~cKff
l::,. -SCORE .JOINTS-CONTRACTOR SHAU LAYOUT SCORE JOINTS lN FIELD IN CONSULTATK)N WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SCORE JOINTS SHALL SE PROVIDED SO THAT NO MO R ETHAN 4COS.F. Of CONCRETE 5 OPEN
& -EXPANSION JOINTS -PROVIDE l/2' FELT EXPANSION JOINTS WITH JOINT SEALING
COMPOUND AND SANDED JOINTS BETWEEN FLATWORK AND STRUCTURES OR COLUMNS 01! WAllS
IRRIGATION SLEEVING-TO ALL POT AND !NTERIOR PLANTER LOCATIONS. SLEEVING UNDER PARKWAY -SCHEDULE40PVC TO SE t \/2 TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE IRRGATION PIPE {REcmo FIELD LOC ATIONS). CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEVING BETWEEN HAl!DSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS.
PA -PLANTING AREA
-STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS.
0 -THIS PLAN IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AESTHETIC DIRECTION AND FINISH ONLY. -CIVIL ENGINEERING BY OTHERS
Cw-ID NOTE:
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQUAL TO l°"OF THEIR BIO TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WORK OR
MATERIALS DURING CONSrnUCTION IF REQUESTED BY OWNER
OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT
USED SHALL BE REMITTED TO OWNS!.
All UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN FREE OF ANY TREES. PLANTINGS OR STRUCTURES THAT WILL CAUSE A PR08LEM FOR THE UTILITY COMPANY to ACCESS OR TO USE THAT DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE UTILITY COMPANIES ARE wnHIN THE LAW TO DEMOLISH OR DAMAGE ANYTHING THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PREVENIS ACCESS ANO use OF THE DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IF NECESSARY. UTILITY COMPANIES HAVE THE RICHT TO ACCESS THEIR FACILITIES AT ANY TIME FOi! MAINTENANCE AND EMERGENCY PURPOSES. IF NECESSARY. THE UTILITY MAY REMOVE LANDSCAPING. STRUCTURES OR ANYTHING ELSE BLOCK.ING ACCESS TO THEIR FACILITlES AT OWNER EXPENSE. UTILITIES ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES OR TREES WITHIN Cw.JD OR USSR
EASEMENTS. CVWO WILL NOT !IE RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGE OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS.INCLUD ING
8UT NOT LIMITED TO DECORATNE CONCRETE. LANDSCAPING.
CURB. GUTTER. SIDEWALKS.PlANTEl!S. GATES AND RELATED
IMPROVEMENlS INSTALLED WITHIN CVWD AND /OR US8/;!
EASEMENT ANY PLANTING WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT. • l
KEYMAP
CINCEP. ROGERS RD
r r--
LOT 10 (
~
§ LOTl8
5l
LOT 11 ;,
0 LOT 17 u
LOT 12 a
LOTl6
,;
~
LOT 13 g
LOT15
LOT 14
i--
VI.A FLO~ENC!A
~ ~
SCALE: I"= I0'--0"
GRAPHIC SCALE
,r--!
@I;)
MSA CONSULTING. i,JC
, ............... , ••• (<o' ,., .... ,, • , ..... ~ .. ~, ............................... "" ...... ,,-....,..,.<I\ ---··-···~ ...... , .... ,.,.,,,..,_ .. , V) _J
<(
z u
<( c...
_J ~ <(
0... I-u
z 0 uJ
0 Q:'.l'.)
;::: <( ~ u ~ ~
::::, I-0
Ck:: ZI I-V) 0~ z
0 Q:'. <(
LL a<
u <(
w z
_J
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT :
PROJECT MANAGER: DR
DRAWN: DI!
CHECKED; ML/TM
PROJ .NC. 2776
DATE; 11/10/22
SCALE: l ";J0.-0"
REVISIONS: !NIT
I CITYSU8MITTAL 11/10/22 DR
CITY COMMENTS &
RESUBMITTAL 01/05/23 DR
g:
SHEET t-0:
L-1.00
5-
1 4
4 CONTINGENCY NOTE:
KEYNOTES
G) CONCRETE ORrJEWAY TO BE NAlURAL COLORED
CONCRETE WITH SANO ANISH. THIC~NESS TO BE PEI!
CITY SIAl'OARD OR PER 5011.5 ENGINEEl!.SEE PlAN
FOR SCORE JONT PAIIHN.
@ 3' SQUARE POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE STEPPING
PADS . CONCRElE TO BE NAIURAL COLORED WITH
SANO FINISH TO MATCH ORIVEW>,Y. THICKNESS 10 BE
PER CITY SIANOARO OR PH SO l.S ENGINEER
@ CONCRETE STEPS. CONCRETE 10 5E NATURAL COLOR
WITH SANO fif',IISH SEE OITAIL B. SHEET L-2.00
@ CMU WAlL BY ARCHITECT. SEE ARC!iTECIURAl PlANS
FOR OEIAU. SPECFICAIIONS AND
VERIICAL/HORllONT"l CONTROL
® PEDESTRIAN GATE. SEE A RCHTEC IURAL PLANS Felt
DETAILS. SPECflCATIONS ANO VERTICAL/HORllONTAL
CONTROL
@ Ull.lTY PER MECHA,-,CAL ELECTRICAL A..O
PLUMBl'IC.
IJllllTYEASEMENTNOTE:
~
BELLA VIA COURT SOUTH
' ' '
----=-=
___ \,... __ ...J __ _
--12-6--=i:::::::=17-0"=P::: It
1 1 ~ -+-+-r-' -----+4+ ' ,----,---j "
: I : a: : : J : }3~3·>-1 IS:! I \...L-, C>t I I I I
1'fl ~ ' I I I I I ~ I I GrTli:i
~---;'-+:-'Ir-~--\{_-!--~----I N?OV, E PROVIDED
SO THAT NO MOR ETHAN 400 S.F. OF CONCRETE IS OPEN.
& -EXPANS!ON JOINTS -PROVIDE I /2' FELT EXP,t,NSIO N JOINTS WITH JOINT SEALING COMPOUND AND SANDED JOINTS BETWEEN FLA TWO Rt:: ANO STRUCTURES OR COLUMNS OR WA LLS.
IRRIGATION SLEEVING -TO ALL POT AND INTERIOR PLANTER LOC,t,TIO NS. SLEEVI NG UNDER PARKWAY -SCHEOULE40 PVC TO BE I 1/2 TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE IRRIGATION PIPE (RECORD FIELD LOCATIONS J. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEVING BETWEEN HARDSCAPEAND IRRIGATION PLANS.
PA. PLANTING AREA
• STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS.
0 -THIS PLAN IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AESTHEOC DIRECTION ANO FINISH 0Nl Y. • CIVIL ENGINEERING BY OTHERS
CVWO NOTE:
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQUAL TO 10% OF THEIR SID TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WORK 011 MATERIALS DURING CONSHWCTION Jf REQUESTED BY OWNER
OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT
USED SHALL SE REMITTED TO OWNER .
All UTlllT'f EASEMENTS ARE TO RE.v.AIN FREE OF ANY TREES. PLANTINGS 01! STRUCTURES THAT Wll.l CAUSE A PROBlEM fOR THE UTILIT'f COMPANY TO ACCESS OR TO USE THAT DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE UTILIT'f COMPANIES ARE WITHIN THE LAW TO DEMOLISH OR DAMAGE ANYTHING THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PREVENTS ACCESS AND USE Of THE DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IF NECESSARY. UTILIT'f COMPANIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO ACCESS THEIR FACILITIES AT ANY T~E FOR MAINTENANCE ANO EMERGENCY PURPOSES. IF NECESSARY. THE UTILIT'f MAY REMOVE LANDSCAPING. STRUCTURES OR ANYTHING ELSE BLOCKING ACCESS TO THEIR FACILITIES AT OWNER EXPENSE. UTILITIES ARE NOT RESPONSl8LE FOR REPLACING ANY PLANTING WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT.
NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES OR TREES WITHIN CVWD OR USBR
EASEMENTS. CVWD WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGE OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS.INCLUD ING
BUT NOT L~ITED TO DECORATIVE CONCRETE. LANDSCAP ING.
CURB. GUTTER. SIDEWALl:S.PLANTERS. GATES AND RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED WITHIN CVWD AND /OR USBR
EASEMENT
KEYMAP
GINGER ROGERS RD
r --
LOT 10 (
J
§ I LOT 18
Sl
LOT 11
6 LOT 17 u
LOT 12 0
LOT 16
~
LOT13 i
LOT 15
LO T 14
-
VIA FLO IH:Nl'.:IA
l
~
SCA LE: l" = 10'-0"
GRAPH IC SCALE
I~
~
MSA CONSULTING. tr JC " .. ~ ... .,, .. , ..... ,,.,, ... _ .. ,,,c,., .. ,. .. ~, ........... , ...... -~ ........ ,,...,,...(... ·-~ --.----.. -~.-...... , ......... .., ......... ....
V) _J
- -~
::J I-0 a,:: ZI I-0 ~ V') z Cl::: <( 0 LL °" u <(
LlJ z
_J
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
PROJECT MANAGER: DR
DRAWN: DR
CHECl:ED: Ml/TM
PROJ.NO. 2776
DATE: 11/10/22
SCALE: 1"•10'-0'"
REVISIONS: '""
1 CITYSU&MITTAL 11110/22 DR
CITY COMMENTS &
,RESUBMITTAL 01/05/23 DR
I .
12:,_:
SHEET NO:
L-1.0 1
5-
1 4
5 CONTINGENCY NOTE:
_L
~18
~
iB
i!i
w
:S :,:
·~ ·s
1 ~ u
' ~ I l ·t ~-j~"~'-' ,.6u . D 23 --------: g~'I • ,., £ El
---£ -----~---T----M ,., I 1-----~
---I I I • ---l----f------£
------' I I ,--s--..l : :-----1
' -
I B ELLA VIA -COURT(SO UTI--1
-~
KEYNOTES
CD CONCRf!E DRIVEWAY 10 BE NATURAL COLORED
CO'-ICRETE WITH SANO RNISH. THICICNESS TO BE PER
CITY STANO ... RO OR PEI! SOILS ENGNEER.SEE PLAN
FOR SCORE JOINT P"'TTEl!N.
@ l" SQUARE POUR IN Pt.,t.CE CONCRETE STEPPING
PADS. CONCRETE TO SE N ... TURAL COLORED WITH
S"'NO FINISH TO M"'TCH DRIVEW ... Y. THIC KNESS 10 SE
PeR cnY STANDARD OR PHSOILS ENGINEER
@ CONCRETE STEPS. CONCRETE TO BE NATURAL CO LOR
wnHS ... NOftNISHSEEOEIAllB.SHEEll-2.00
@ CMU WALL IY ... RCH!IECT. see ... RCl'tTECTUR ... l PLANS FOR DET ... I.S. SPECFtCATIONS AND
VE.11:TIC ... l/HOR llONTA l CONTROL.
® PEDESTRIA.N CME. see A!tO-ITECTUR"'L PLANS FOR
DETAILS. SPECFICATJONS ANO VERTICAl/HORllONlAL
CONTROL.
@ ~~~~~E~ MECHAl'ICAL. ElEClRICAL ANO
UTlllTYEASEMENTNOTE:
CONCRETE FOOTING/ FLA TWORK NOTES:
STANDARD:
-CONCRm SHAL L BE 2.500 PSI (MIN.I TYPE-2 PORTLAND CEMENT UNLESS OTHEl?WtsE DIRECTED BY SOILS llEPOH. PLACE REINFOllC ING STEEL J ' FllOM BOTTOM AND 2" FROM80TH ENDS IMIN). SEE PLAN FOil STEELSllE. QUANTITY AND LOCATION UNLESS OTHERWtsE DlllECTED BY SOILS REPOllT
CONCllETE JN HOT SO IL:
-ALL CONCRETE PLACED IN CONTACT WITH HOT SOil. DEFINED AS SOIL WITH A PH OF 7 OR HIGHER. WILL CONFORM TO ASTM C\012-95 AND CONTA IN THE FOLLOWING MIX PAR ... MElERS: TYPE 5 PORTLAND CEMENT WITH A .35 WATER/ CEMENT RATIO:
ASTM CLASS F FLY ASH (20 PERCENT VOLUMETRIC REPLACEMENT!: SUPERPLASTICllER ADMIXTUR E (10-I SR.OZ . PEI! 100 LBS OF CEMENT] UNLESS OTHERWtsE DIRECTED BY
SOILS REPORT
-CONCRETE SHAU HAVE ACCElERATED CURING AND SHALL ATTAIN A MINL'.-IUM STRENGTH OF 4.500 PSL THE TYPE 5 PORTLAND CEMENT SHALL BE CERTIFIED AS HAVING LESS THAN ~TRl-cALCIUM ALUMINATE UNLESS OTHERWt!iE DIRECTED SY
SOILS REPORT
HA!tDSCAPECENERAL NOTES
-CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO REVIEW HARDSCAPE LAYOUT PRIOR TO FORMING FOR FlATWORK.
-ALL CONCRETE SHAU BE .47 WATER / CEMENT RATIO. 4.00l psi. 6 l/2SAC(MIX.
TYPE IIPORTLAND CEMENT
/ONLY IN SOILS WITH HIGH ALKALINE OR SALT CONTENT ).
-ALL CONCRET,E COLO RS TO 8E CONFIRMED SY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN AELD PRIOR TO POURING WITH SAMPLE PANELS PER SPECIFICATIONS. -INCLUDE PENETRATING SEA LEI! ON ALL SITE CONCRETE AND PAVEl!S. ( MATTE FINt!iH UNLESS OTHEllWt!iESPECIAED.)
-PARKING. ROAD LAYOUT AND DRNEWAYS SY OTHERS.
-ADA ACCESSIBILITY ANALYSIS. COMPLIANCE AND DESIGN BY OTHERS. ( SHOWN HERE FOR REFEllENCE ONLY).
-LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST FIELD REVIEW fLA TWOR( LOCATIO NS PRIOR TO CONCRETEBEINC POUREO.
-ALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE DESIGN ON FLAIWORK SY CIVIL ENGINEER. 6 -SCORE JOINTS -CONTRACTOR SHALL LA '!'OUT SCORE JOINTS IN FIElD IN CONSULTATION .WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SCORE JOINTS SHALL SE PROVIDED SO THAT NO MOREIHAN 4CO S.F. OF CO NCRETE ts OPEN.
& -EXPANSIO N .JOINTS -PROVIDE \/2" FELT EXP ... NSION JOI NTS WITH JO INT SEALING
COMPOUN D A ND SANDED JO INTS BETWEEN FLATWOR( AND STRUCTURES OR COLUMNS OR WA LLS.
IRRIGATION SLEEVI NG -TO ALL POT AND INTERIOR PLANTER LOCATIONS . SLEEVING UNDER PARt::WAV -SCHEDU LE 40 PVC TO BE I 1/2 TIMES THE DIAMETER Of THE IRRIGATION PIPE (RECORD FIELD LOCATIONS). CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEVING 8EIWEEN HARDSCAPE AND IRRICATION PLANS.
PA • PLANTING AREA
-STRUCTURAL DESIGN 8V OTHERS.
0 -THl!i PLAN ts INTENDED TO PROVIDE AESTHETIC DIRECTION AND FINtsH ONL '!'. -CIVIL ENCJNEERJNC 8'!' OTHEllS
CVWD NOTE:
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHAlL INC LUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQUAL TO \C'il, OF THEIR BID TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WORK OR ·MATERIALS DURING CONS TRUCTION IF REQUESTED BY OWNER
OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT
USED SHALL BE REMITTED TO OWNER .
ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN FREE Of ANY TREES. PLANTINGS OR STRUCTURES THAT WILL c ... USE A PROBLEM FOil THE UTlUTY COMPANY TO ACCESS OR TO use THAT DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE UllLITY COMPANIES ARE WITHIN THE LAW TO DEMOUSH OR DAMAGE ANYTHING THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PREVENTS ACCESS ANO USE Of THE DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IF NECESSAll'!'. UTILITY COMPANIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO ACCESS THEIR FACIUTIES AT ANY TIME FOR MAINTENANCE ANO EMERGENCY PURPOSES. IF NECESSARY. THE UTl.lTY MAY REMOVE LANDSCAP ING. STRUCTURES OR ANYTHING ELSE 8LOCt::ING ACCESS TO THEIR FACllfllES AT OWNER EXPENSE. UTI.IIJES ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY PLANTING WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT.
~ENT STRUCTURES OR TREES WITHIN CVWD OR US!R
EASEMENTS. CVWD WILL NOT BE llESPONSl!Lf FOR CHANGE OR
REPLACEMENT Of ANY SURFACE IMPROVEMEN TS.INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO DECORATI\IE CONCRETE, LANDSCAPING.
~
SCALE: 1" = 10"-0"
GRAPHIC SCA LE
~up~e.Ov~~~ ~~~L~~~-~~~RSC~~E~N"oNo,o~E~~;~ 1 1lf Ir:-,
EASEMENT
KEYM A P
G!NCEP. ROG ERS RD
r ;---@I;)
LOT 10 \ r LOT 18 5
~
MSA CONSULTI NG, !.'JC "' .. """'"'""•'• • -•M-1•''"'.-.,....,,_..
V) _J
LOT 11 -- --~
LOT 15
LOT 14
:::J f-0 ~ Z I f-V) 0 ~ z
0 Cl;'.<
LL °"
-u <(
VIA FLO RENCIA LlJ z
_J
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
PROJECT MANAGER: DR
DRAWN: DR
C HECKED: Mt/TM
PROJ.N:. 2776
DATE; 11/10/22
SCALE: 1" .. 10'-0"
REVISIONS: l1N1T
I CITYSt.rBMJTTAL 11/10/22 OR
CITY COMMENTS A.
RESU8MITTAl 01/05/23 DR
11 --
£:,._:
SHEET NO:
L-1.02
5-
1 4
6 CONTINGENCY NOTE:
l 1;
iJ;
w ' z
~ u
I I
-~--r-----+.----
1 I
1 -_,
BELLAV;A~----\'
(E'l'NOTES
CD CONCl1ElE CRIVEWAY TO BE NATURAL COL011EO
CONCRETE WllH SANO FINISH. THICKNESS TO ~E PER
CITY SIANOARD OR PER SOILS ENGINEER.SEE PLAN
FO R SCORE JOINT PAHHN
@ J' SOU ARE POUR IN PLACE CONCRETE STEPPI NG
PADS. CONCRE'lE 10 6E NATURAL COLORED WITH
SANO FINISH 10 Mit.lCH DRIVEWAY, THICKNESS 10 SE
PER CfTY STANDARD OR PER SOILS ENGINEER.
@ CONCRETE STEPS. CO NCRETE TO ~E NATURAL COLOR
WITHSANDFNSHSEEOETAll6,SHEETL-2.00
@ CMU WALL BY ARCHITECT . SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
FOR OEIAU. SPEC FICATIONS AND
VE-'IICALJHORIZONTAL CONIROL.
® PEDESUIA.N GATE. see ARC!-«ECIURAL PLANS FOR
DETAIi.$, SPECl'ICAIIONS ANO VEJ!IICAL/HORllONTAL
CONTRO L.
@ UllJIT PER MECKANICAL ElECli'lCAL AJ,0
PLUMBl'IC.
UTILITY EASEMENT NOTE:
CONCRETE FOOTING/ FLAIWORI:: NOTES:
STANDARD: ~ESHALL BE 2.500 PSI IM!N.I TYPE-2 PORTLAND CEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY SOILS l!EPORT. PLACE REINFORCING STEEL J' FROM BOTTOM AND 2" FROM80TH ENOS IMIN).SEE PLAN FOR STEEL SIZE. QUANTITY AND LOCATION UN~ESS OTHERWISE D!RECTED BY SOILS REPORT
CONCRETE IN HOT SOIL:
-ALL CONCRETE P\.ACEO IN CONTACT WITH HOT SOIL. DEFINED AS SOil WITH A PH OF 7 OR HIGHER, Will CONFORM TO ASTM CI012-95 AND CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING i\AJX PARAMETERS: l"YPE 5 PORTLAND CEMENT WITH A .35 WATER/ CEMENT RATIO:
ASTM CLASS F FlY ASH (20 PERCENT VOLUMETRIC REPLACEMENT!: SUPERPIASTICIZER ADMIXTURE (10-ISFL.OZ . PER 100 LBS Of CEMENT) UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY
SOILS REPORT
-CONCRETE SHALL HAVE ACCELERATED CURING AND SHALL ATTAIN A MINIMUM STRENGTH OF 4.SCO PSL THE l"YPE 5 PORTLAND CEMENT SHALL BE CEIHIFIEO AS HAVING lfSS THAN ~TRI-CALCIUM ALUMINA TE UNLESS OTHUWISE DIRECTED BY S011.sREPORT
HARDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES
-CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO REVIEW HAROSCAPE LAYOUT PRIOR TO FORMING FOR FLATWORK.
-AU CONCRETE SHALL BE .47 WATER/ CEMENT RATIO. 4,CXXl pM. 61/2SACK MD(, fYPE IIPORTLANO CEMENT
fONL YIN SOILS WITH HIGH ALKALINE 01! SAll CO NTENT).
-All CONCRETE COLORS 10 BE CONFIRMED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN AfLD PRIOR TO POURING WITH SAMPLE PANELS PER SPECIFICATIONS. -INCLUDE PENETRATING SEALER ON A LL SITE CONCRETE AND PAVERS. I MATTE FINISH UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.)
-MRKING, ROAD LAYOUT AND DRNEWAYS BY OTHERS.
-ADA ACCESSIBIUTY ANALYSIS, COMPLIANCE AND DESIGN BY OTHERS. ( SHOWN
HERE FOR REFERENCE ONLY)
• LANDSCAP E ARCHnECT MUST FIELD REVIEW FLATWORK LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONCRETEBEING POURED.
-All GRADING ANO DRAINAGE DESIGN ON FLATWORK BY CNIL ENGINEER.
A -SCORE JOINTS -CONTRACTOR SHALL IA YOUT SCORE JOINTS IN FJELD IN CONSU LTATION WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SCORE JOINTS SHALL SE PROVIDED SO THAT NO MORETHAN 4COS.F. OF CONCRETE IS OPEN.
& -EKPANSION .JOINTS -PROVIDE 1/2' FELT EXPANSION JOINTS WITH JO INT SEALING
COMPOUND AND SANDED JOINTS BETWEEN FLATWORK AND STRUCTURES OR COLUMNS 011 WALLS.
IRRIGATION SLEEVING -TO ALL POT ANO INTERIOR PLANTER LOCATIONS. SLEEVING UNDER PARKWAY -SCHEDULE 40 PVC TO SE I 1/2 TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE IRRIGATION PIPE (RECORD FIELD LOCATIONS). CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE IRRIGATI ON SLEEVING BETWEEN HAROSCAPEANO IRRIGATION PLANS.
PA -PLANTING AREA
-STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY On-tERS,
0 -THIS PLAN IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AESTHETIC DIRECTION ANO FINISH ONLY. -CML ENGINEERING BY OTHERS
C'll-lONOTE:
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQUAl TO 1°"-OF THEIR 810 TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WORK OR
MATERIALS DURING CONSTRUCTION IF REQUESTED BY OWNER
OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT
USED SHALL BE REMITTED TO OWNER,
All UTILITY EASEMENl5 ARE TO REMAIN FREE Of ANY TREES. PLANTINGS OR STRUCTURES THAT WILL CAUSE A Pi?OUEM FOR THE UTILITY COMPANY TO ACCESS OR TO USE THAT DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE UTILITY COMPANIES ARE WITHIN THE LAW TO DEMOLISH OR DAMA.CE ANYTHlNC THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PREVENil ACCESS AND USE Of THE DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERl'f IF NECESSARY. UTILITY COMPANIES HAVE THE RJGHT TO ACCESS THEIR FACILITIES AT ANY TIME FOR MAINTENANCE ANO EMERCENCY PURPOSES. If NECESSARY. THE lJT1llTY MAY REMO\IE LANOSCAPINC, STRUCTURES OR ANYTHING asE BLOCKING ACCESS TO THEIR FACILITIES AT OWNER EXPENSE. UTI.ITIES ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY PLANTING WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT.
NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES OR TREES WITHIN C'll-10 OR USBR EASEMENTS. CVWD WILL NOT !IE RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGE OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS.INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO DECORATNE CONCRETE. LANDSCAPING.
CURB. GUTTER. SIDEWALKS.PLANTERS. GATES AND RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED WITHIN C'll-10 ANO /OR USSR
EASEMENT
KEYMAP
LOT lO
LOT 11
LOT 12
LOT 13
LOT 14
GINGER ROGERS RD
r -
l ~
§ LOT 18
5:
8 LOT 17 u
0 LOT 16
,; ;
LOT 15
r--
-
\/IA FLORENCIA
~
SCAL E: I"= 10'--0"
G RA PH IC SCALE
~
MSA CONSULTINC. lfK
'°""M'"'"'~'"'•"' "'"'''''"""I • ••'I S,,.-,,,, ,.,.....,.., ...... -~ .. ,., ... ..,,., ... - -~ I-0 ZI 0~ ~ <( LL<:.'.
<{
UJ z
_J
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT :
PROJECT MANAGER: DR
DRAWN: OR
CHECKED: ML/TM
PROJ.1'(:, 2776
CATE: 11/10/22
SCALE; 1"=1 0"-0"
REVISIONS : INIT
l\ CJTY SUBMITTAL 11/10/22 OR
CITY COMMENTS &
RESUBMITTAL 01/05/23 DR
'"------_,_,
£:,,_:
SHEET1'1l:
L,-l .03
5-
1 4
7 1/2" EXPANSION JO INT WITH
@;)
_ SELF-LEVELING, SANDED JOINT
SEALER. SEALER TO SE OECOSEAL NATURAL COLORED
125 OR APPROVED EQUAL. NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY \ ,, .... , ... , ,----3/4"RAD. TYP. REQUIRED NUMBER OF RISERS WITH SAND FINISH I CONCRETE SLASI EX.JOINT
~P-+ NATURAL COLORED t'··--t M~A 70NSU~T1~c .• 1~J~
0 ~.;; . ·. '"' , . I CONCRETE PAVING
WITH SAND FINISH
------. .----
"' 7 II
~
EXPANS ION JOINT 7 -'-
/
/
~#JBARCONT. / (./) . / _J If CONCWESLAO / @; EACH RISER - -~ u 1--0 :::i ZI (le'. 0~ I-V) Cl!'.<{ z LL"" 0 <( u w z _J
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
gJ
"~~
PROJECT MANAGER: DR
DRAWN: DR
CHECKED: Ml/TM
PROJ.NO 2776
DATE: 11/10/22
SCALE: PER DETAIL
REVISIONS: INIT
Ji\ CHY SUBMITTAL 11/10/22 OR
M_;E~~f~~~LENTS 0~ /05/23 DR
A
A:
A
A
A
A:
SHEET r,../0•
L-2 .00
5-
1 4
8 1 I _BELLAVIA COURT"SOUTH :J "" ------------------------~~ --,-7 +---+----ffi--- ~ ~
VALVE SCHEDULE
NUMBER
11.1 11.2
11.3 GENERAL INSTALLATION NOTES
1, IRRIGATION PLAN IS D1AGRAMMA TIC . FINA L LOCATION OF PIPING WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. MAINLINE AND LATERALS SHA LL BE PLACED IN SAME TRENCH WHEN POSSIBLE.
EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN
CLARIFICATION ON LY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED JN PLANTED AREAS.
2. INSTALL ALL EQU IPMENT AS SH OWN IN DETAILS. ALL EQU IPM ENT
REQU IRED BUT NOT SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWING SHALL BE
PROVIDED BY THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR.
3 . ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL SE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE W ITH MANUFACTURER·S INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
-4. 8ACKFLOW PROTECTION UNIT(S] SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES.
5 . IRRlGA TION CONTRAC TOR SHALL SE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPER WORKMANSHIP DURING INSTA LLATION.
6. A LL MA INLINE PIPING SHALL HAVE A MIN IMUM OF 18 . COVER (24·· UNDER RO .... DS AND STREETS. AND 24 .. IF RUSSER RING SEALED PIPE).
A LL LATERAL PIPING SHALL BE TRENCHED A M INIMUM OF 12" DEEP.
ALL CON TRO L WIRE GOING UNDER DRIVEWAYS AND STREETS
SHALL SE SLEEVED 1N A PVC PIPE. LATERAL PIPING GOING UNDER DRIVEWAYS AND STREETS SHALL SE SCHEDULE 40 PVC.
7. ALL VALVE CONTROL WIRE SHALL SE INSTALLED IN SAME TRENCH WITH MAINLINE WHEREVER POSSIBLE AND SHALL SE SOLID COPPER.
AWG # 14, TYPE UF. DIRECT BURIAL WIRE, USING SNAPTITE OR SCOTCH-LOC W1RE CONNECTORS.
CONTINGENCY NOTE: UTILITY EASEMENT NOTE:
MODEL S IZE TYPE GPM
HUNTER PGV-ASV 314" BUBBLER 4
HUNTER PGV-ASV 3/4~ BUBBLER 3,6
HUNTER ACZ-075-25 3/4" AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS 1.69
7. ALL TRENCH BACKFILL SOIL SHALL BE C LEAN, FREE OF ROCKS.
TRASH. GLASS. SOLVENT AND CEMENT CONTAINERS AND RAGS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPACT ALL TRENCHES TO A DENSITY
EQUAL TO THE U NDISTURBED SOIL AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING ANY SETTLED TRENCHES SACK TO FINISH GRADE.
8 . CONTRAC TOR SHALL FLUSH ALL PIPE LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLING SPRINKLER HEADS.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTA LL VALVE BOXES AT GRADE OVER ALL
ELECTRIC VALVES AND INSTALL ANTI-DRA IN VALVES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT LOW HEAD DRAINAGE EROSION OR DAMAGE.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL SPRINKLERS AND VALVES FOR PROPER OPERATION AND COVERAGE. SPRINKLERS ALONG STREET
CURBING AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE SET BACK 24 INCHES PER
CVWD. All SPRINKLERS SHALL BE ADJUSTED SO THAT NO WATER IS
THROWN ON TO STRUCTURES OR NA TURAL FACED MASONRY
WALLS. NO OV ERTH ROW IS PERMITTED ONTO HARDSCAPE .
11. 120 VOLT POWER FOR CONTROLLER[S) IS TO BE PROVIDED BY O THERS ON A SEPARATE CIRCUIT BREAKER . IRRIGATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL SE RESPONSIB LE FOR MAKING CONNECTIO NS TO CONTROLLER. CONTROLLER FINAL LOCATION SHALL BE
DETERMINED SY OWNER·s AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
12. MSA CONSULTING. INC. SHALL APPROVE ALL INFIELD DESIGN
CHANGES DUE TO SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN CHANGES TO
GUARANTEE 100% SPRINKLER COVERAG.E OR THE IRRIGATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQUAL TO 10'-" OFTHEJR BIO TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WOii( OR
MATERIALS DURING CONSTRUCTION IF REQUESTED BY OWNER
OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY CONTINGENCY FUNOS NOT
USED SHALL BE REMITTED TO OWNER,
Atl UTILITY EASEMENl'S ARE TO REMAIN FREE OF ANY TREES. PLANTIN GS OR STIWCTURES THAT WU CAUSE A PROBLEM FOR THE tJTllTY COMl'ANY TO ACCESS OR TO USE THAT DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE UTILITY COMPANIES ARE WITHIN THE tAW TO DEMOLISH OR DAMAGE ANYTHIN G THAT ts LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PREVENTS ACCESS ANO USE OF THE DEDICATED PORIION OF THE PROPERTY IF NECESSARY. UTILITY COMPANIES HAVE THE RICHT TO ACCESS THEIi! FACILITIES AT ANY TIME FOR MAINTENANCE ANO EMERGENCY PURPOSES . IF NECESSARY. THE UTILITY MAY REMOVE LANDSCAPING. snucTURES OR ANYTHING ELSE BLOCKING ACCESS TO THEIR FACILITIES AT OWNER EXPENSE. UTILITIES ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLAC IN G ANY PLANTING WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT. .
J:
,-,
l
E§! PSl@POC PRECIP
22.4 22.5 0.01 in/h
22.4 22.5 O.Oin/h
34.1 34.2 O.Oin/h
13. MSA CONSULTING. JNC . SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPROPER
OPERATION OF SYSTEM DUE TO CONTRACTOR NOT FOLLOWING
PLAN PIPE SIZING OR INA DEQUATE STATIC PRESSURE OR INFIELD DESIGN CHANGES WITHOUT APPROVAL.
14 . MSA CONSULTIN G. INC . IS NOT RESPON SIBLE FOR ERRORS IN
INSTALLATION IF THEY HAVE NOT SEEN RETAINED FOR INSTALLAT IO N OBSERVATION.
15. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO SPECIFICAllONS FOR DETAILS. STANDARDS OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP .
SPECl~LNOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO BUBBLERS AT THE EDGE OF THE ROO T BALL FOR EACH FIELD GROWN OR 24" AND LARGER BOXED TREE OR AND OTHER TREE AT THE DlRECTlON OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECT.
2. POP-UP SPRAY SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD TURF : TWO OR THREE INCH POP-UP BODY. GROUNDCOVER & LOW-GROWING TYPES:
THREE OR FOUR INCH POP-UP BODY. TALLER TYPES: FOUR OR SIX INCH POP-UP .
CVWDNOTE:
NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES OR TREES WITHIN CVWD OR USBR
EASEMENTS. CVWD WILL NOT 8E RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGE OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS.INCLUDING
8UT NOT llM.ITED TO OECORATIVE CONCRETE. LAN DSCAPING.
~
SCA LE: 1" = 10'-0"
GRAPHIC SCA LE
~~~8c~~~:s ~~~~L~~~S•~~~~RSc~6TESA:OND/O~EL~~;~ ~ ~ I~~
EASEMENT
KEYMAP .
UINU:::r; ,;vv:::: - -~
y CVWD 11on,..,.,,.-..,con>Mu1"op11<0wl SHEET NO:
~~11if~~~~~~~ L-3.00 ,-,.---~
5-
1 4
9 ~
BELLA VIA COURT SOUTH
__ t ----~ , -=F= , • , • , o] r--=-=--== ' : : : f ---,--- 1 I I 1 I I I
·i------==f LL . ! !IJ r~ I 1------: . ~-~--~ -r---~~-----1 --I 1
I I I I I I
~ ~
' '
t
VA LVE SCHEDULE
NUMBER MODEL SIZE TYPE GPM !:§!. PSl@POC PRECIP
12.1 HUNTER PGV-ASV 3/4" BUBBLER 2.5 21 .7 22.1 0.01 in/h
12.2 HUNTER PGV-ASV 3/4" BUBBLER 1 21,0 21.1 0.02 in/h
12.3 HUNT ER ACZ-075•25 3/4" AREA FOR DRJP EMITTERS 1.39 34.1 34.3 0.0 in/h
GENERAL INSTALLATION NOTES
1. IRRIGATION PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC . FINAL LOCATION OF PIPING Will BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. MAINLINE AND LATERALS SHALL BE PLACED IN SAME TRENCH WHEN POSSIBLE.
EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN
CLARIACATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTED AREAS.
2. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN IN DETAILS. All EQUIPMENT
REQUIRED BUT NOT SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWING SHALL BE
PROVIDED BY THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR.
3. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WtTH
MANUFAC TURER·S INSTRUCllONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
4. BACKFLOW PROTECTION UNIT{S) SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES.
5. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPER WORKMANSHIP DURING INSTALLATION.
6. ALL MA INLINE PIPING SHALL HAVE A M INIMUM OF 18"• COVER {24" UNDER ROADS AND STREETS. AND 24 .. IF RUBBER RING SEALED PIPE).
All LATERAL PIPING SHALL BE TRENCHED A M IN IMUM OF 1z• DEEP.
ALL CONTROL WIRE GOING UNDER DRIVEWAYS AND STREETS
SHALL BE SLEEVED IN A PVC PIPE. LATERAL PIPING GOING UNDER DRIVEWAYS AND STREETS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC.
7. ALL VALVE CO NTROL WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SAME TREN CH WITH MAINLINE WHEREVER POSSIBLE AND SHALL BE SOLID COPPER.
AWG # 14. TYPE UF. DIRECT BURIAL W IRE. USING SNAPTITE OR SCOTCH-LDC WIRE CONNECTORS.
CONTINGENCY NOTE: UllflYEASEMENTNOTE:
7. ALL TRENCH BACKFILL SOIL SHALL BE CLEAN. FREE OF ROCKS.
TRASH. GLASS, SOLVENT AND CEMENT CONTAINERS ANO RAGS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPACT ALL TRENCHES TO A DENSITY
EQUA L TO THE UNDISTURBED SOIL AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING ANY SETTLED TRENCHES BACK TO FINISH GRADE.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH ALL PIPE LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLING SPRINKLER HEADS.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTA LL VALVE BOXES AT GRADE OVER ALL
ELECTR IC VALVES AND INSTALL ANTI-DRAIN VALVES AS NECESSARY TO PREVE NT LOW H EAD DRAINAGE EROSION OR DAMAGE.
10. CONTRAC TOR SHALL ADJUST ALL SPRINKLERS ANO VALVES FOR PROPER OPERATION ANO COVERAGE. SPRINKLERS ALONG STREET
CURBING AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE SET SACK 24 INCHES PER • CVWD. ALL SPRINKLERS SHALL BE ADJUSTED SO THAT NO WATER IS
THROWN ONTO STRUCTURES OR NATURAL FACED MASONRY
WALLS. NO OVERTHROW IS PERMITTED ONTO HARDSCAPE.
11. 120VOLT POWER FOR CONTROLLER(SJ IS TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS ON A SEPARATE C IRCUIT BREAKER. IRRIGATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING CONNECTIO NS TO CON TROLLER. CONTROLLER FINAL LOCATION SHALL BE
DETERMIN ED BY OWNER·s AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
12. MSA CONSULTING. INC. SHALL APPROVE ALL INFIELD DESIGN CHANGES DUE TO S1TE PLAN AND LANDSC"-PE PLAN CHANGES TO GUARANTEE 100% SPRIN KLER COVERAGE OR THE IRRIGATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQUAL TO lOS OF THEIR BID TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WORI:: OR MATERIALS DURING CONSTRUCTION If REQUES TED BY OWNER
OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT
USED SHALL BE REMITTED TO OWNER.
ALL UTILflY EASEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN FREE OF ANY TREES, PlANTINGS 01! STRUCTURES THAT Will CAUSE A PROBLEM FOR THE UTll.flY COMPANY 10 ACCESS OR TO USE THAT DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE UTllTY COMPANIES ARE WITHIN THE lAW TO DEMOLISH OR DAMAGE ANYTHING THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PREVENTS ACCESS AND USE OF · THE DEDICATED PORTION OF THE Pl!OPERTY IF NECESSARY. UllLITY COMPANIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO ACCESS THEIR FACI.ITIES AT ANY Tv-.-lE FOR MAINTENANCE AND EMl:RGENCY PURPOSES. IF NECESSARY. THE UTILITY MAY REMOVE LANDSCAPING. STRUCTURES OR AN'l'THINC ELSE BlQC(INC ACCESS 10 THEIR FAClllTIES AT OWNER EXPENSE UTILITIES ARE NOT RESPONS!BlE FOR REPLACING ANY PLANTING WITH!N THEIR EASEMENT,
13. MSA CONSULTING. INC. SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPROPER
OPERATION OF SYSTEM DUE TO CONTRACTOR NOT FOLLOWING
PLAN PIPE SIZING OR INA DEQUATE STA TIC PRESSURE OR INFIELD DESIGN CHANGES WllHO UT APPROVAL.
14. MSA CONSULTING, INC . IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS IN
INSTALLATION IF THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RETAINED FOR INSTALLATION OBSERVATION.
15. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DETAILS, STANDARDS OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP.
SPECIAL NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO BUBBLERS AT THE EDGE OF THE ROO T BALL FOR EACH FIELD GROWN OR 2- ,:,nOU>9'_,
'"'"""'""°""".,""'tl ,,_wol ..,.,,.,..,_..,.,.,.,.._,,_IAUl,gl\l>O~WO,. ~~~~~ ...._,~,tuchlr••o1.,,,,ln.lrrup-nolb •'I•""'-••.-,,-
C/) _j
- -~
<( I-0
(.'.) ZI
0,: 0~
0,: ~ <(
LL c,::
<(
w z _j
LANDSCAPE ARCHnECT:
PROJECT MANAGER: DR
DRAWN: EW
CHECl::ED: ML/TM
Pl!OJ.t,,O. 2776
DATE: 11/10/22
SCALE: 1"=\0'~
REVISIONS: IN!T
1 CITYSUBMITTAl 11/10/22 DR
CITY COMMENTS !.
RESUBM!TTAL 01/0S/23 OR
L,:
SHEET t-0:
L-3.01
5-
1 5
0 'ft
'''
I
I
I
,,, [ ffi I
~
w z 5 I
~ i
I
_ U I I pa===J ---..____;..... f '
I. .J " ----a I t r----!--~ ~I I _, ____ _j_ r----,-----j . · l~-
A~ __ □ J--=~~l==-~ -------~-~-~-------~----~----]
..
B ELLA v,;,.. ci:iu Rrrsoun:r -"
VA LVE SC HED ULE
NUMBER MODEL SIZ E 1YPE GPM
17.1 17.2
17 .3
GENERAL INSTA LL ATION NOTES
1. IRRIGATION PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC . FINAL LOC ATION OF PIPING W ILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. MAINLINE AND LATERALS SHALL BE PLACED IN SAME TREN C H WHEN POSSIBLE.
EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS IS FOR D ESIGN
CLAR IFICATION ONLY AND SHA LL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTED AREAS.
2. IN STALL ALL EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN IN DETAILS. A LL EQUIPMENT
REQUIRED BUT NOT SPECIFIED ON THE DRA WING SHAL L BE
PROVIDED BY THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR.
3. ALL EQU IPMENT SHALL BE INSTA LLED IN ACCORDANCE W ITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS .
4. BACKFLOW PROTECTION UNIT(SJ SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CO DES.
5. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPER WORKMANSHIP DURING INSTA LLATION.
6. A LL MA INLINE PIPIN G SHALL HAVE A M INIMUM O F 18 .. COVER {24 ..
UNDER ROADS AND STREETS. AND 24" IF RUBBER Ji!ING SEALED PIPE).
ALL LATERAL PIPING SHALL BE TRENCHED A MINIMUM O F 12'' DEEP.
A LL CONTROL W IRE GO ING UNDER DRIVEWAYS AND STREETS
SHALL BE SLEEVED IN A PVC PIPE. LATERAL PIPING GOING UNDER DRIVEWAYS AND STREETS SH ALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC .
7. ALL VALVE CONTROL W IRE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SAME TREN C H WITH MAINLINE WHEli!EVER POSSIBLE AND'SHALL BE SOLID COPPER.
AWG ll 14. TYPE UF. DIRECT BURIAL WIRE, USING SNAPTITE OR SCOTCH-LOC WIRE CONNEC TORS.
CONTINGENCY NOTE: UTUTYEASEMENTNOTE:
HUNTER PGV-ASV 314" BUBBLER 2
HUNTER PGV-ASV 3/4" BUBB LER 2
HUNTER ACZ-075-25 314" AREA FOR DRIP EMITTE~S 1.59
7. A LL TRENCH BACKFILL SOIL SHALL BE C LEAN. FREE OF ROCKS .
TRASH, GLASS. SOLVENT AND CEM ENT CONTAINERS AND RAGS.
CO NTRACTOR SHALL COMPACT ALL TRENCHES TO A DENSITY
EQUA L TO THE U ND ISTURBED SOIL ANO SHALL BE RESPON SIBLE FOR BRINGING ANY SETTLED TRENCHES BACK TO FIN ISH GRADE.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUS H ALL PIPE LI NES PRIOR TO INSTALLING SPR INICLER HEADS.
9. CONTRACTO R SHALL INSTALL VALVE BOXES AT GRADE OVER ALL
ELECTR IC VA LVES AND INSTALL ANTI-DRAIN VALV ES AS NECESSARY TO PREV EN T LOW HEAD DRAINAGE EROSION OR D AMAGE .
10. CON TRAC TOR SHALL ADJUST ALL SPRINICLERS AND VALVES FOR PROPER OPERATION AND COVERAGE. SPRINKLERS ALONG STREET
CURSIN G ANO DRIVEWAYS SHALL BESET BACK 24 INCHES PER
CVWD. All SPRINICLERS SHALL BE A DJUSTED SO THAT NO WATER IS THli!OWN ON TO STRUCTURES OR NATURAL FACED MASO NRY
WA LLS. NO OVERTHROW IS PERMITTED ON TO HARDSCAPE.
11. 120 VOLT POWER FOR CONTROLLER(S) IS TO BE PROVIDED SY OTHERS ON A SEPARATE CIRCUIT BR EAKER. IRRIGATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAK ING CONNECTIO N S TO CONTROLLER. CONTROLLER FINAL LOCATION SHALL BE
DETERMINED BY OWN ER'S AUTHORIZED REPRES EN TATIVE.
12. MSA CONSULTING. INC. SHALL APPROVE ALL INFIELD DESIGN
CHANGES DUE TO SITE PLAN ANO LANDSCAPE PLAN CHANGES TO
GUARANTEE 100% SPRINICLER COVERAGE OR THE IRRIGATION
CO NTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBI LITY.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACIOR SHAU INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQUAL TO l°" OF THEIR 810 TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WOR( OR
MATERIALS DURING CONSTRUCTK)N IF REQUESTED BY OW NER
OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT . ANY CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT
USED SHALL BE REMITTED TO OWNER.
All UTIIJl'I' EASEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN FREE ·of ANY TIIEES. PLANTINCS OR STRUCTURES THAT Wl L CAUSE A PROSlEM FOR THE UTllTY COMPANY TO ACCESS OR TO USE THAT DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERl'I'. !HE UTl lTY COMPAN IES Al l!oma[;a"""'°""''c.ado,~IG'I ~~=-::~ t!...i"':":.:;:;~;:"'~"'::.::.'" Al)poo.,,.or,..._o,CVWfl""tt 10b.....-.g
,-,.---~
(ill;)
MSA CONSULTING.1/K ........... ,,.,,., .. ,.,,.,,,..,_.,,., ... ,..,..,.,, ,..__, ............. ~,... .... ·"'"''~"""'· .r.., ,. .. -----~~ ... ~,.,. ...... , ....... ,,, _ _..,.,,.._ C/) _J
- -~
<( f-0
l.'.) ZI
a2 0~
De: ~ <(
LL D!
<(
w z
~ '" _J
ffi
"
LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC T:
PROJECT MANAGER: o,
DRAWN: EW
CHEC(ED: ML/TM
PRDJ.NO . 2776
DATE: 11/1 0122
SCALE: \"•10'-0"
REVISIONS: INIT
l\CIT'YSUBMffTAL 11/10/22 DR
ClfY COMMENTS &
RESUBMITTAL Ol/OS/23 DR
SHEET NO:
L-3 .02
5-
1 5
1 ' ' '
] I
~t7 ij
l,, ~ f"~
'
I
~~!□; ' ' ' '
P:ds'H I
" l
.i'!j
1 •• ~:
I ----:=t::.::--
L_________-----+ '
'~--~ ----~ -----~----t----
' '
:1
1 <>
I -r-
cw ~u,,.r.,.., W1.~ru,.,~,.i t,-, ~., Cc<>rl>I.,._, Vu.,,,W\11 ce,,,_o.,.,r,Cat........,Co_,,.,,..,,c....._:.c 9""" l"CV'Ml,1,:,H .... ,nol 1t,o,planlWar""lulw ::,c;:i,..=~ :::::,"'::,.;,~:!,~'--t lnt01>1 - -~
<( f--0
Q z:r:
Cl<:: 0~
Cl<::
0,:: <(
LL a<
<(
Ll.J z
_J
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
PROJECT MANAGER: DR
DRAWN; EW
CHECKED: Ml/TM
PROJ.r,,O. 2776
DATE: 11/10/22
SCALE: \":10'-0"
REVISIONS: !NIT
1_ CITY SUBMITTAL 11/10/22 DR
CITY COMMENTS &
RESU8MITTAL 01/05/23 OR
SHEET r,,0;
L-3.03
5-
1 5
2 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
SVMBO RESSURE C01o1PENSATING
• 1AREA TO RECEIVE DRIP EMITTERS
) • •. •, •.•,•.·.DRIP EMITTERS. Fl.cmRATESOF0.5GPH.:8LUE, f
, • , , • • 1.0CPH:BLACK,AN02.0GPH~REO. C01o1ES'MTH
' ' ' ' ' • • A 10-32THREAOE0 INLET X BARB OUTLET WI
_ • • • • • • • • • • • • • CHECK VALVE
•
]i
@]
@
~~~~
05PCel'nllll!r1(1 H!.1gnedtoea~ LOW WU pl.,ntj
10PC emrtter& (1 aHJgred lo n~h MOO WU plant)
HUNTER POV-ASV
3/4" ANO 1" PLASTIC ELECTRIC REMOTE
CONTROL VALVE. WITH REMOVABLE
ANTI-SIPHON CAP, ANO FLO'N CONTROL, FOR
RESIDENTIAL USE. INLET/OUTLET FEMALE NPT
THREADS
MATCQ.NOFICA 759
BRASS SHUT OFF BALL VALVE. 112"TO 4"'. TWO
PIECE SOOY , BLOW-OUT PROOF STEM. CHROME
PLATED SOLID BRASS BALL. THREADED. WITH
PTFE SEATS. SAME SIZE AS MAINLINE PIP£
HUNTER HC-12
12 ST A TION CONTROLLER WITH WI-Fl
CONNECTION
HUNTER HC--075 .. f"LOW
314" FLOW METER FOR use WITH HYORAWISE
ENABLED CONTROLLER TO MONITOR FLOW ANO
PROVIDE SYSTEM ALERTS. Al.SO FUNCTK)NS AS
STAND ALONE A.OW TOTALIZER/SUS METER ON
Atl"f RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL IRRIGATION
SYSTEM.
6°~~R~~g~~~c;R~~l~ 1·· TEE OFF OF HOME. l
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE PVC CLASS 200 SOR
" S12E NOT INDICATED ON AU. LINES. LATERAL
LINES TO BE 314" EXCEPT 'M1ERE INDICATED
PIPE SLEEVE F'\IC SCHEOUI..E 40
OCCURS WHEREVER PIPE CROSSES
HARDSCAPE. FEATURE, UNDER WALL OTHER
=::: = = = = = = ICOI STRUCTION. TO BE2X OIA. OF PIPE.
SLEEVING TO EXTEND 24"' BEYOND
CONSTRUCTION. MAINUNETO HAVE INSTALLED
AN ADJACENT SPARE SLEEVE.
IRRIGATION NOTES
1, THESE PLJ,,NS ARE DIAGRAMMAT IC
360 120 10.s
:'.! MAINLINE B, VALVES ARE SHOWN IN HAROSCAPE FOR CLARITY ONLY .
EQUIPMENT TO BE PLACED IN Pl.ANTER AREAS
3. FINAL CONTROLLER LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED BY O\NNERS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATK:>N. P loS-5 Elevat10nlou .
l..0S$tln>ugnv1Ne
Preu.ureReq.atCnt.oeJrlSlll!ICln
~::~:~:9une
Loss fllr POC to VaNe EJeva110n
L.osslor&cidlow
c n1iu1 Stat10n P,e....,re at POC·
PreY.ureAvad!lble
Conlractortoprovide
1"tee olf c!nc,me.
'" 18.2GPM
2GPM
18.2GPM
1&.3
JOPSI
O.OJPSI
OPSI
OPSI , ... ,
34.0PSI
O.OPSI
0.0PSI
oes,
OPS le
PRESSURE AVAILABLE
StahcPrei.UreatPOC
OESIGN ANALYSIS
M8llll'l"UmStab0nFlow
Flow Ava,laole al POC
Resrduill FlowAva11.lllle
Cr~rulSlahon
Oe$!gnPr0$Sure
Fric110nLou
FrttrrvsL0ss
Elevalronlou
Loss ttv0ugnVa"1e
Prt$WreReq.11tCrahC11!Stat10n
L0$$lo1Frt11"9S
Lo..lorlola,nLine
L05S tor P0C ID Vat.-e Ele""'bon
L01i1ilorBackllow.
CrrllealStat11;1nPre$Sl,lealPOC
Preuure A1t11,lable
ReslCIUIII Pre$S1,1"eAvaU!lle
P,O,C. NUMBER · 03
Willl!rSourcelnlo!mauon:
FLOW AVAILABLE
Po1nt01ComecbonSlle
FlowAv,,)able
PRESSURE AVAILABLE
StHe Preuuu, at POC
DESIGN ANALYSIS
Ma1om.1mS1i1110nFJow
Flow Available al POC
Crd,calStahon.
0cs,gnPrcs111e
Frict,onloi.&
Frtllngsloss
Elevat10nlou
Loss ttv o-"'hVat,,e
?reuureReq.a1CntrcaJStat10n
LosstorFr!trf"91>
LD551otMa,nLine
LOI$ tor POC 10 Va,"1e Elevation
L055tor8acldlow
CrlllC8IStat10nPressurea1POC
P,euure A....,,lable
Contraetor10prcvode
1"teeolt0fh0me.
, ..
18,2GPM
2.5GPM
18.2GPM
15.7GPM
,,.,
,OPSI
0.o7PSt
0.01?$1
OPSI
4PS/
34.1 PSI
O.OPSI
0,01 PSI
OPSl
OPSI
34.1 PSI
'5PSI
«:1.9PSI
Contrac::tortoprovlde
1"teeonorhon-e.
,.
18.2GPM
'5PSI
4GPM
18.2GPr.l
11 .3
,OPSI
0,12 PSI
0.01 PSI
OPSJ ,es,
34,1 PSI
0.0PSI
0.02PSI
OPSI
OPSI
34.1 PSI
75PSI
~
MSA CONSULTING. Ith.
....... , .. .,,.,.K, .. •o •'"'l '"t "ff'•'0 .. U"0•'•"•'0 ... , ....... , .......... ~ ...................... ,., ..... ... ....,_..,8~ ...... -.,."''' ... , ....... ,_
(/) _J
-4:'. I-u
_J
0.... 0 uJ
z Q:'.l'.)
0 -~
w
",~
PROJECT MANAGER: DR
DRAWN: EW
CHECl 1 ............. .,._u,_mno_n1.ylCllyorCoun11'1. SHEET J\Kl:
16 .. 2 HUNTE R PGV-ASV 314" BUBBLER 2 21 .. 4 21 .. 4 0 .. 01 in/h ::-:...-=~"::,.-=.:.,c.::,:'i!':.;;'C,::~;:,.:."!:.,""'
16.3 HUNTER ACZ-075-25 314" .. AREA FOR DR IP EMITTERS 0.62 34 .. 0 34.0 0 .. 0 in/h .n1""~'""".,."'01on,>ni"'-"1',c,1t..,"1Jn1""'"'...,._ ~i:~ ~~~i~: ~~~~~ t::: :~::~~= ; ;~:; ;~:; g:g~ :: ~'~:°:~::7:~:~--··.,~--L-3.04
17.3 HUNTER ACZ-075-25 3/4" AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS 1.59 34 .. 1 34.1 0.0 in/h ~ WAIU......,.AW,t:N!L/IMIIT ... NI ~ 01.VIIOrMINISllYICESOl~AIIIMNI
5-153
!H 1. I, I: I: i 1:
JiH ~ n i" I tP { I ! f !
I ,i f 1 ' ? ,! .
1 i I
I
f
f
I
!
nt I I I· I· ~ I:
Iii i ; i. j i ~ ~ !f~~i i
1 [Ii i t t I •
! ! f ' ' • ·"-' n I
I
f
i
I
i
;i! 1. 1. I: i: ~ I:
J1H i i If
,~ i t I f f ~u f l ~ !
•f. f ~ !
I
I
t
!
' !
r H : I I· I· [ I· i;. ~ o .. ,.. '!> .. a ..
i1H H I . ~
irI f I l ~ Ii, I ! -
1~1 l I' t , r ' !
I
I
!
~1
1 1 ~"• i I;; :
.. r>,. _; 0
s~p-: "~s: > 11111 J,ii z I, ~ .,,, o
~is. ,,~ Hll~ tn
~i:-l! ,ai l~ tnu ~1H ~
1f2I~ tHI ~
.;,l !! l "' ~ •t 1g, .IH o s i" ,i~f;'i !'!
-, I d
,.~poe ; ococh}.,J [
1•1°1 -
1 ; s§co§I; 11·• l _, I~ -! . g l a , " ~
~
Ulj~ i~
-1_t -~'
PITT
7 •
~
: a
~, f~ ,t i
..e...J.....i. 'il
~
8 ~§git
~& ~
ti~i!lr r~,~~i .._ ,.. !: l :E ! r ~
~
m'i mri I 1 • •i ~
fH,f c ,. ,n , ..
i ·1 •i• i . i 3 i ~ ~ ~ _ i a ~ ······1 .;! occc , • 8§i~§1i I ~ f ' . 1i -
0 ~110 il -~{
8 :!ii 8 i
[i ii§ iiiif
' HW
II H1· ft 11
"IJr iff . mi I f mH ! . ' ,
i ::; 0> oil ag ~ 8., •• , !
"
1i8 !,z rt ~
LIN EA FRONT YARD TYPICALS
RANC HO M IRAGE. CA
H .... ~ H~
·~ 0 H
~.;
5-154
'v-:J '3~'v~IW OH-:JN'v~
Sl'v':JldAl o~v A lNO~:J 'v':3Nll
Sll\t' 130 NOil \t'S>l~~I
~
w z
2 0
I"' z
0 u
0. iii a
a
u
w
::'.;
-I
·1
~
('.) :e:
~
~
w
~
a a,
('.) z
i
I
('.)
;:'1-------------------+-,
5-
1 5
5 BELLA V IA COURT SOUTH
~
PLANT SCHED ULE Ll FLOOR PLAN IL2 FLOOR PLAN!
Tl!EES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME '"' WU l!EMAl!ICS 0 ' ACACIA ANEUl!A MULGA 24"BOX L0.2
PALMTl!EES QTY BOTANICA.L NAME COMMON NAME '"' WU l!EMAl!KS ~ ' WASHINGTONIA )( ftLIBIJSTA HYBRID FAN PALM l 6'8TH MO.S ACCENTS QTY BOTANICAL NAME COt-JMON NAME "' WU l!EMAl!t::S ® " AGAVE VICTOl!i.\E-l!EGINAE QUEEN VICTOl!IA AGAVE SGAL L0.2 0 ' OASYLIRION LONG5SIMUM TOOTHLESS DESEl!T SPOO N lSGAL L0.2 ALTERNATIVE:
DASYLll!IONW HEELEl!I
© " ECHINOCACTUS GIWSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS IZ'DIA.MlN. L0.2 ALTERNATIVE:
AGAVE GEMINIFlOl!A
Gl!OUNO COVERS Q TY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME '"' WU REMARKS
INSTAU TOA
• .1.629SF J/fJ' 0ELl!IOPEBHE IMIN.DEPTHOF:J'
AVAILABLE AT SOUTHWEST
BOULOEI!
CONTINGENCY NOTE: UTUT'I' EASEMENT NOTE:
I I I i----~----
1 I
I I ____ _J
I
LIGHTI NG SCHEDULE LI FLOOR PLAN (L2 FLOOR PLAN) ~ MANUFACTUl!El!/MO0ElJDESCl!IPT~ 9!r DETAIL ' ..
i
)'(
PALM UPLIGHT-f)( LUMINAll!E RP-9LED -SV 4
2700
TREE UPLJGHT-FX lUMIN.,,IRE FS-JlEO..SV
2700 dr.....-.gbt'CVYII01l 1ovoi
._..,,,r;ocl\nlr;""-CI-U!itll l...,~Wa\l. "-~~_..
..,,,_..,,..,.uc1urv,01unr\nl......,not1>1,pU"dv ---.i
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQUAL TO 10'/L OF THEIR 81D TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WORK OR MATERIALS DURING CONSTRUCTION IF 11EOUESTEO 8Y OWNER
OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ANY CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT
USED SHA LL BE REMITTED TO OWNER.
Atl UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN FREE OF ANY TREES. PLANTINGS OR STRUCTURES THAT Wll CAUSE A PROBLEM FOR THE tJTUTY COMPANY 10 ACCESS OR 10 USE THAT DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE UTl lTY COMPANIES ARE WITHIN THE
LAW TO DEMOLISH OR DAMAGE ANYTHIN G THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PREVENTS ACCESS AND USE OF THE DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IF NECESSARY. UTIUTY COMPAMIES HAVE THE RICHT TO ACCES S THEIR FACILITIES AT ANY TIME FOR MAINTENANCE AND EMERGENCY PURPOSES. IF NECESSARY, THE UTILITY MAY REMOVE LANDSCAPING. STRUCTURES OR AN'fl'.HING ELSE 8LOCl(JNG ACCESS TO THEIR FACILITIES AT OWNER EXPENSE. UTILITIES ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY PLANTING WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT.
~UPRR
86v~~~~s ;~~~L~~~-~~~i~RSC~~ESANADNO/O~E~~~~ i · 1r:,-, EASEMENT Cw.'1.1~~•
~
MSA CONSULTING 'JC .......... ,., .... , .... ,,.,, ... ~ ... ,, ........... ,, ... __,., ......... ~ ..................... _.,, ..... .. ...,..,. __ ,., ..... ., .. ...,,.._,.,.,, ... _,,v z (/) _j
- -~
z I-0
<( ZI
l'.) 0~
z Cl,:'.<
LL a:: ~ z <(
<( LlJ -' z c... _j
LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC T·
PROJECT MANAGER: o,
DRAWN: o,
CHECt-:ED: Ml/TM
PROJ.t,,0. 2776
DATE: 11/10/22
SCALE: 1-,.10·~·
REVISIONS: l 1NfT
.1.. C ITY SUBMITTAL ll/10/22 OR
CITY COMMENIS &
RESU8MITTAL 01/05/23 DR
;·
SHEET J\Kl:
L-5.00
5-
1 5
6 PLANT SCHEDULE V2 FLOOR PLAN
TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME
0 3 THEVETIA PERUVIANA
PALM TREES I GTY BOTA NICAL NAME
~ I WASHINGTONIA X FILIBUSTA
I SHIWBS /QTY BOTANICAL NAME
0 I· FIC US NITID A 'COLUMNAR'
ACCENTS /QTY BOTANICAL NAME
e " AGAVE PARRYI 'TRUNCATA'
GROUND COVERS QTY BOTA NICAL NAME
• .1.6965F 3/8' DELRIOPESBLE
CONTINGENCY NOTE: UTILITY EASEMENT NOTE:
~ ~
BELLA VIA COURT SOUTH
COMMON NAME see
YELLOW OLEANDER 24''8OX
COMMON NAME see
HYBRID FAN PALM 16'BTH
COMMON NAME 5'E
WEEPING FIG 15GAL
COMMON NAME SUE
PARRY"S AGAVE SGA L
COMMON NAME SUE
WU
M0.5
WU
M0.5
WU
M0.5
WU
L 0.2
WU
~ ~
REMARICS
REMA!U'.S
REMARKS
REMARKS
ALTERNATIVE:
AGAVE DESMETTIANA
REMARKS
INSTA LL TO A
MIN.OEPTHOFJ"
AVAILABLE AT SOUTHWEST
BOULDER
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQUAL TO 10% OF THEIR BID TO PROVIDE A.DDHIONA.L WORK OR
MATERIALS DURING CONSTRUCTION IF REQUESTED BY OWNER
OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT . ANY CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT
USED SHALL BE REMITTED TO OWNER.
All UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN FREE OF ANY TREES. PLANTINGS OR STRUCTURES THAT Will CAUSE A PROBLEM FOR THE UTlllTY COMPANY TO ACCESS OR TO USE THAT DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE UTILITY COMPANIES ARE WITHIN THE LAW TO DEMOLISH OR DAMAGE ANYT HING THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PREVENTS ACCES5 ANO use OF THE DEDICATED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IF NECESSARY. UTILITY COMPANIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO ACCESS THEIR FACILITIES AT ANY TIME FOl1 MAINTENANCE ANO EMERGENCY PURPOSES . IF NECESSARY. THE UTILITY MAY REMOVE LANOSCAl'ING. STRUCTURES OR ANYTHING ELSE BLOCKING ACCESS TO THl:IR FAC ILITIES AT OWNER EXPENSE. UTILITIES ARE NOT RESPONS IBLE FOR REPLACING ANYPLANTINGWITHIN THEIREASEMENT.
I
C
LIGHTING SCHEDULE V2 FLOOR PLAN -------~
SYMBOL MANUfACTURER/MOOEl/OESCRlPT!ON QI!' Qs!~
' •
i
~
PALM UPLIGHT-FX LUMINAIR E NP-9LED-SV 1
2700
TREE UPLIGHT-FX LUMINAIR E FB-JLED-SV
2700K
PATH LIGHT-FX LUMINAIRE M-PJ-JLED-SV
2700K
KEYMAP
GINGt;P. ROG tR~ REJ r-
LOT 10 \ § LOT 18
LOT 11
0 LOT 1 7
u
i
D LOT 1f
LOT 16
LOT 13 I
LOT 15
LOT 14 ~
VIA FLOR Er~CI/,
PLANT NOTES :
1. PLANT QUANTITY: LtsT ts PROVIDED FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR/CLIENT AND ts NOT INTENDED FOR ACCURATE BIDDING PURPOSES. .
2 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SHALL FIELD REVIEW A LL PLANT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. PLANTS SHA LL BE PLACED IN THEIR INTENDED LOCATIONS WHILE STILL IN THEIR CONTAINERS/BOXES.
3. UNIT PRICES: LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHAU FURNtsH UNIT PRICES
FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL AND IRRIGATION MATERIAL WHEN SUBMITTING THEIR BID TO THE OWNER.
4. WARNING: PLA NT MATERIAL LISTED MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE AGRICULTURA L COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE.
LANDSCAPE CONHACTOR, PLEASE CONTACT THE
AGRICULTURA L COMMISSIONER FOR APPROVAL PLANT MATERIAL NOT CONFORMING WITH QUARANTINE LAWS MAY BE DESTROYED AND C!V!L ACTION TAKEN. A LL PLANT MATERIAL ts SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AT THE DtsCRETION Of THE AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER·s OFFICE.
LIGHTING NOTES: ~ PIIOVIOEO ON THE.SE PLANS IS FOIi LOW LEVEL lllUMINAl!ON OF PLANT MATERI A L A ND ADJACENT Al1£A5 AND 15 NOi INTENDED 10 /'IIOVIOE SECURITY 0 11 SAff!Y UGKTING. SECU~IIY. SAFE'TY. ANO PHOIOMETl?IC LIGHTING LAYOlJT AND Cli!CUIHNG TO 8f PRO VIDED BY LICENSED ENGINEE~.
2. All AXTURES SHAU BE MOUNTED ON A PERMA-POST .
3.All FIXTURES SHALL BE CONTROLLED WI TH PHOTOCELL ·ON", TIMER ·o ff WITH MANUAL OVERRIDE. EQ UIPMENT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE OWNER .
@;)
MSA CONSULTING. li'JC.
_,.,,,. .... c,,, ....... ,,,.,, ........ ,.,. ...... .,, •• ... ._...,_ ......... ~ .. ,, ............. ,_.,; .... O,, ...., __ ._.,..,,.,..c,.,... • .., .... ,.v..., z C/) _J
- -~
z I-0
lon ....... lh ,i .
"PPl<>"'21<>1 1""'d1.,_-,gbo(C1'WD1kllt mlMe0p1> •al
i., ~"'""°'""'"''°""""'cna usu ~q,,,..o~Wo,. l"'v• ~-wot,. uni INr"""""'T '•"cMvl 0 1""1' LnJ rn,,y not l><: ~1.,n,..., .,.,ml,4,~ :,,c0':":,°.;"'~i:,':,.':":;!~~l-<ll-""-"l""'r,c"t•,t0b~ ~ 6,:
SHEET NO:
L-5.01
5-
1 5
7 CONTING ENCY NOTE:
. . . . . _ □€HHH!lf
··~-·· .-·· ..... @). ~.@: (§:@: oe e e e -~. ~ ·-· ·-~---lli e ~ e e
BELLA VIA COURT SOUTH
PLANT SCHEDULE V3 FLOOR PLAN J-3LED-SV
CVWONOTE:
NO PERMANEN T STRUCTURES 011 TREES WI THJN·CVWO 011 US!I! EASEMENTS. CVWO W ILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGE OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY SURFACE IMPl!OVEMENTS.JNCLUOJNG
BUT NOT LIMITED TO DECORATIVE CONC11 $E. LANDSCAPING .
~ ~
SCAL E: 1" = 10·--0"
GRAPHIC SCA LE
KEYMA P
GINGER ROGERS RD r-
t J
LOT 10 s LO T 18
~
LOT 1 1
6 LOT 1 7
u
LO T 12 D
LOT 1 6
~
;j
LOT 1.3 :;;
LOT 15
LOT 14
'--
VIA FLOR ENCIA
PLANT NOTES:
1. PLANT QUANTIT'I': USl IS PROVIDED FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CON'IRACTOR/CllENT ANO IS NOT INTENDED FOR ACCURATE BIDDING PURPOSES.
2 LAN DSCA PE ARCHITECT: SHALL FIELD REVIEW A LL PLANT LO CATIONS PRIO R TO PLANTI NG . PLANTS SHALL BE PLACE D IN THEIR INTENDED LO CATIO NS WH ILE STILL IN THEIR CON'! AINERS/BOXES.
3. UNrl PRICES: LANDSCAPE CONTRACTO R SHA LL FURNISH UNrl PRICES FOi! A ll PLANT MATERIAL A NO IRRIGATIO N MATERIAL WHEN SUBMITTING THEIR BID TO THE OWNER.
4. WARN ING: PLANT MATERIAL LISTED f.MY 011 MAY NOT HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE AGRICUlTURAL COMMISSIONER"S OFFICE.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. PLEASE CONTACT THE
AGRICULTURA L CON,MISSIONEl1 FOR APPROVAL. PLANT MATERIAL NOT CONFORMING WrlH QUARAN'IINE LAWS MAY BE DESTROYED AND CML ACTION TAKEN. All PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO INSPECOON AT THE DISCRETION Of THE AGRICUlTUl!AL COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE.
LIGHTINGNOi:§; .
I. UGHIINC OESIGNl'IIOVIOEO ON THESE PLANS IS FOIi LOW LEVEl llUMINAIION OF PLANT MAlEilAL ANO AOJACEN'! AREAS ANO IS NOT NTENOEO TO l'l!OVIOE SECURITY 01! SAF£T'I' UGHIWG. SECURITY. SAFETY. ANO PHOTOMETRIC UCHIINO LAYOUT ANO CIRCUl'llNO 10 &E l'ROVIOEO IY LICENSEOENOINEER.
2. All FIXTURES SHALL BE MOUNTED ON A PEl!MA-POST.
3.ALL fl)(TURES SHALL BE CONTROLLED WITH PHOTOCEtl "ON·. TIMER "OFF"WlfH f.MNUALOVHl!IDE. EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS SHALL !E DETERMINED BY THE OWNER.
CVWD LANDSCAPE APPROVAL
11' ec<>t rC,...,"1
App,a .... 11!lm1Jr--,gt,.CVWll1kJll_,1nal"""°lllw !e OPP,<>VIII "'"""",._.~_,1 ""'1-1.hlll,gr,1.o~-. 1,.,.,,pian,.-
~~~~~~E:."":~~~~o:=!~
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHAL L INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY
EQ UAL TO l O'Jt OF THEIR BIO TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WORJ: OR MATERIALS DI.IRING CONSTRUC TION If REQ UESTED BY OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCH ITECT. ANY CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT
USED SHA LL BE REMITTED TO OWNER .
All IJTILIT'I' EASEMENn ARE TO REMAIN FREE OF ANY TREES. PLANTINGS 011 STRUCTURES THAT WILL CAUS E A PROBLEM FOi! THE IJTILIT'I' COMPANY TO ACCESS OR TO USE THAT DEDICATED PORTION Of THE PROPERT'I'. THE IJTILIN COMPANIES ARE WITHIN THE
LAW TO DEMO LISH OR DAMAGE ANYTHING THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PREVENTS ACCESS ANO USE OF THE OEOICAfEO PORTION OF THE PROPERT'I' IF NECESSARY. UTILIT'I' COMPANIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO ACCESS THEIR FACILITIES AT ANY TINIE FOR MAINTENANCE ANO EMERGENCY PURPOSES. IF NECESSARY. THE UTILITY MAY REMOVE LANDSCAPING. STRUCTURES 011 ANYTHING ELSE BLOCKJNG ACCESS TO THEIR fAC llfJES AT OWNER EXPENSE. UTJUflES ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY PLANT-.i G WITHIN THEIR EASEMENJ.
~~~BC)~~!~s ~~~~L~~~S.~~~~Sc~~ESA NAONO/O~E~~~tl", ---.~--•,1":-""\,•J"I~ ~----- EASEMENT ~
~
MSA CONSULTING. !,JC
................ ••••• -- --~
z I-0
<( ZI
'-' 0~
z Cl<:'. <(
LL CIC
i== z <(
<( .w _, z
0...
~ _J
~
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
PROJECT MA NAG ER: DR
DRAWN: OR
CHECl::ED: ML/TM
PROJ.NC. 2716
DATE: 11/10/22
SCALE:
REVISIONS: INIT
~ CIT'I' SUBMI TTAL 11/10/22 011
CIT Y COMMENlS &.
RESUBMITTAL 01/0S/23 DR
SHEET r,,,0:
L-5 .02
5-
1 5
8 CONTINGENCY NOTE:
l N "' 0 0
j .,;
_o
t8
~ w w
~ ~
w w z z :J :J
I I u
~ .: :; :;
I
L
BELLA VIA COURT SOUTH
PLANT SCHEDULE H2 FLOOR PLAN IHI & H3 FLOOR PLANS)
Tl!EES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
~ ~
ISIZE WU
~
□.I"
1 I 1;"
' ' ' ' '
nz:::::2' I I ~
' ' ' ' ----L ____ !_ __
' ' ' ' ---+-r
u ½==rdl ----~----l--~-,
'
LIGHTING SCHEDULE H2 FLOOR PLAN (HI & H3 FLOOR P
REMARKS
0 2 CE'1CIOIUM X 'DESERT MUSEUM' OESEOT MUSEUM PALO VERDE 136"80X L0.2 SYMBOL
•
MANUFACTUl!El!/MODEyDESCl!IPTION Q!r DETAIL
PA LM UPLIGKT-FX LUMINAll!E NP-9LED-SV 2
2700
PALM TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME I SIZE
~ 2 WASHINGTONL,t,. X flLJBUSTA HYSRIO FAN PALM 16'BTH
ACCENTS QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME sue
(0 38 EUPHORSIAMILII CROWN OF THORNS SGAL
GROUND COVERS QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ISIZE
·l.150SF 3/fJ' 0Ell1IOPE88LE I-
LJTILITV EASEMENT NOTE:
WU REMARKS
M0.5 I
WU REMARKS ·-
L0.2 ALTEl!NATNE:
EREMOPHILA HYGROPHANA
WU REMARKS
INSTALL TOA
MIN. DEPTH OF3" AVAILABLE
AT S0llTHWEST BOULDER
~
C~ONOTE:
TREE UPUGHT-FX lUMINAIRE FB-.JLED-SV
2700 LANT NOTES· ~NTfTY: LIST IS PROVIDED FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE
CONTRACTOR/CLIENT AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR ACCURATE BIDDING PURPOSES.
2. LA NDSCA PE ARCHITECT: SHALL FIELD REVIEW All PLANT LOCATIONS Pl pvanO "',ga'""'°"l'Qll "
c:°"pe,ol""'"""ll-ci> nc1o,,.,...,1c""'lol"ic,opp,oY01
a..~-nru.orl\n .... - -~
I-0 z:r: Ou
Ck'. ~
LL ·<><
<( w z
_J
LANDSCAPE ARCHnECT:
PROJECT MANAGER: OR
DRAWN: OR
CHECt::EO: ML/TM
PROJ.1'£. 2776
DATE: 11/1 0/22
SCALE: 1·=10·-0-
REVISIONS: '""
1\ Cl'N' SUBMITTAL 11/1 0/22 OR
CITY COMMENTS &
RESUBMITTAL 0 1/05/23 QR
SHEET NO:
L-5.03
5-
1 5
9 FXLuminaire
I lnCtJn«"'...Ccr>tWc/lLi!]hts I ORDl:ll:1',G 1NFORMATION WM,[)E'S(E'll i RP: Well Light
!Al.'.l QMl-fhllf'l!' .o,,: ,-,.,~
.,i.:,,..-.""''-W\(>'l' '
........ --...... ~-~""·"'''-'""'''"""-•· ... -
(/) _J
V) - -~
V) ~o
C)
z:r:
z Ou
i==
Cl,'.'.~
I LL""
C) opmct..,. _,., I" Q OQ YOl<>1 lhl>d n<>tc<>mlluk: •OI "'""'"'"""'"""'"""'clgn,;j IJSl ll ll9'l><>~Wl>I'-lrcu, plarn,WDI!. on.J pcrmi>nenl ,~ucluru, <>1~ ..-..i rruyr,ot 1w pur,,.,o or ,m,ul.:~ :,,c/:,1:,,,::,,~ ;:.:7:;!~•,;:kll-'NCll'"'tl,cu, 101 o~IC.-w,g ~ L)._:
SHEET NO
L-5.04
5-
1 6
0 OIOII/ONIA!,t AMI 'l ll>A>l,.,.UMO
STAKING DETA IL
NOTE:
3 TREE DOUBLE STAKE PLANTING BACKFllL TO BE NATIVESITESOlt.ONLY CO,ICl£1f.v.NDNm
WAIU .. IOIIIAtl
VOl(l).DOMOI
C0Vl.l:""'111...ulCHD~
IOl'SCIA55A>IUMJ'il
NOii ·
we,ouNDOIA.Wllll!Yl'IIH
J "Ul1 1.A Ol.11'! ""'y II CONMIClU) 10 A COW.OON OIA,a,.,.O IXTIMDfD DOWNINJO""' AUGUll,Ol IDfWAll
l.l0PISID(501
IOOSffl fDSCI .
l00Wt40,0I.