CC12 — Rancho Mirage City Council, July 18, 2024 (part 3 of 4)

TABLE 1: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
Trip Generation Rates'
ITE LU AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Code Quantity2 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Affordable Housing 223 236 DU 0.10 0.26 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.46 4.81 ITE LU
Land Use Code Quantity2 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Affordable Housing 223 236 DU 24 61 85 64 45 109 1,135
Trip Generation Results
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (2021). 2 DU = Dwelling Unit

STUDY AREA
Intersections of "Collector" or higher classification at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips are to be evaluated in the traffic study. Table 2 lists the intersection analysis locations. Exhibit 2 identifies the proposed study area intersection analysis locations and depicts the location of the proposed project in relation to the existing roadway network.

TABLE 2: STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS
# Intersection # Intersection
1 Key Largo Av. / Dinah Shore Dr. 4 Shoppers Ln. / Dinah Shore Dr. 2 Key Largo Av. / Via Vail 5 Monterey Av. / Dinah Shore Dr. 3 Miriam Wy. - George Montgomery / Dinah Shore Dr. 6 Via Vail / Project Entry

TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT
The trip distribution pattern is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, the location of surrounding uses, and the proximity to the regional freeway system. Exhibit 3 present the Project traffic distribution patterns.

Based on the identified Project traffic generation and trip distribution patterns, Project ADT and peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 4.

URBAN CROSSROADS

1.1-3
12-411

URBAN CROSSROADS Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
EXHIBIT 2: TRAFFIC ANALYSIS STUDY AREA

VIA VAIL
O
KEY LARGO AV.

MIRIAM WY.

DINAH SHORE DR.

E./

FOR CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS PURPOSES, VIA VAIL IS

ASSUMED TO BE EXTENDED SOUTHERLY BY OTHERS TO
SERVE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.

PROJECT
ENTRY ---L®
h� w
SHOPPERS LN.
r
jj, �! JR ii --
j
Ft
rI 3
MONTEREY AV.
4 LEGEND:

Q = EXISTING ANALYSIS LOCATION
10 = FUTURE ANALYSIS LOCATION
= FUTURE ROADWAY/PROJECT ACCESS
15868 - Scope.dwg

1.1-4
12-412

URBAN CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
EXHIBIT 3: PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
22 r
5 •
KEY LARGO AV.

VIA VAIL
DINAH SHORE DR.

SITE \\

PROJECT
ENTRY
100
LEGEND:
10 = PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT
= FUTURE ROADWAY/PROJECT ACCESS
15868 - Scope.dwg

1.1-5
12-413

URBAN CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis

0.3 KEY LARGO

VIA VAIL
EXHIBIT 4: PROJECT ONLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
X0(0)
f-18(47)
0(0)-►
5(14)—
O N
r
oM
DINAH SHORE DR.

0.8 'l-58(43)
-3(2)
f -0(0)

1.1 0(0)_4
1(3)�
0(0)—f
r -
O O O
68(6'
0 in f
o O
Z w =
r
LU
w
00 i
0 0 0
O 0 Z
Z
0 5
SITE

PROJECT
ENTRY—=

1.1 II
LEGEND:
24(I8)-
3(2)�
12(9)-,
0 = INTERSECTION ID
4--10(10) = AM(PM) PEAK HOUR

INTERSECTION VOLUMES

10.0 = VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)
NOM = NOMINAL. LESS THAN 50 VEHICLES PER DAY
= FUTURE ROADWAY/PROJECT ACCESS
>-
I"
0 2
15868 - Scope.dwg

1.1-6
12-414

City of Rancho Mirage
April 2, 2024

Page 7 of 11 ends

ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
Peak hour intersection analysis will be provided for the following analysis scenarios:
• Existing (2024) Conditions
• Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project (EAP) (2026) • Existing plus Ambient plus Project plus Cumulative (EAPC) (2026) The City of Rancho Mirage General Plan Functional Roadway Classifications are depicted on Exhibit 5.

LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA
The City of Rancho Mirage states that "While LOS C has long been considered the desirable and optimal level of traffic volume on any given roadway, it represents a standard that is progressively more difficult and less cost effective to achieve in urban areas. For peak operating periods, LOS D or a maximum volume to capacity ratio of 0.90 is now considered the generally acceptable service level."
Where the average daily traffic volume (ADT) based roadway segment analysis indicates a deficiency (unacceptable LOS), a review of the more detailed peak hour intersection analysis is undertaken. The more detailed peak hour intersection analysis explicitly accounts for factors that affect roadway capacity. While this traffic study recognizes LOS D is the City's target LOS for roadway segments, a review of the more detailed peak hour intersection analysis is necessary to determine whether roadway widening along the segment is necessary. For the purposes of this analysis, if the peak hour intersection operations on either side of the roadway segment are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better, then additional roadway segment widening is not recommended. Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, roadway segment widening is typically only recommended if the peak hour intersection analysis indicates the need for additional through lanes.

TRAFFIC COUNTS
Traffic count data will be collected in April 2024 during the AM peak period of 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and PM peak period of 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM.

The City of Rancho Mirage experiences seasonal population variations over the course of the year, with relatively higher populations during the winter months from January to the end of March. The 2024 count data will be collected during April, so a seasonal adjustment to represent the peak period will be applied.

URBAN CROSSROADS

1.1-7
12-415

URBAN CROSSROADS Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
EXHIBIT 5: CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT 0 Critical Intersections
City Roadways
Major Arterial (6D)
Minor Arterial (4D)
Minor Arterial (4D)
(Conceptual Alignment)
Major Collector (4D)
6D - Six -lane Divided Roadway
4D - Four -land divided Roadway
City Limits
— — Sphere of Influence
Sources: Riverside County, 2016; Esri World
magery, 2017.

0.5 1
Miles
Conceptual
Alignment
30th Ave
cc
m M
M
Ramon Rd
Frank Sinatra Dr
Conceptual
Alignment
15868 - Scope.dwg

1.1-8
12-416

City of Rancho Mirage
April 2, 2024

Page 9 of 11 ends

CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC
It is requested that City staff review the list of cumulative development projects (shown on Exhibit 6 and listed on Table 3) for inclusion in the traffic study. Consistent with other studies performed in the area, an ambient growth rate of 2% per year will be utilized as a minimum if necessary. The rate will be compounded over a 2 -year period (i.e., 1.02^2years = 1.0404 or

4.04%) for Interim Year (2026) conditions.

TABLE 3: CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LAND USE SUMMARY
ID Project
Parcel 3 Residential
(south of Project along Via Vail)
Parcel 2 Residential
(south of Parcel 3 along Via Vail)
1 2
3 Rancho Monterey SP
4 Miragedunes Properties
5 Estilo
6 Rancho Mirage LLC
38 JV, LLC c/o Meriwether
Companies
8 GRV Mirage, LLC (ECHO)
9 RM 38 JV LLC
38 JV, LLC c/o Meriwether
Companies
11 Monterey Medical Center
12 Falling Waters
13 Urban Crossings (UHC)
7 10
14 Ponderosa (75% built)
15 Santa Barbara Apartment
16 Vistali/Refuge Residential
17 Portola Av./Frank Sinatra Dr. Residential
18 ED Rancho Mirage
19 Section 31 Specific Plan Project
20 TPM 34741
21 TTM 32308 (Los Ranchos)
22 TPM 36849
Land Use Quantity Units'
Affordable Apartments
Affordable Apartments
Multifamily Residential
Shopping Center
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Medical Office
Single Family Detached Residential
Multifamily Residential
Single Family Detached Residential
Shopping Center
Multifamily Residential
Single Family Detached Residential
Multifamily Residential
Single Family Attached Residential
Multifamily Residential
Residential
Hotel
Commercial
Residential
Single Family Detached Residential
Single Family Detached Residential
Single Family Detached Residential
1 DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
160 DU
250
DU
400 DU
150 TSF
9 DU
39 DU
4 DU
DU
9 DU
82 DU
DU
10 97

75.164
159
111
114
150
48 248
571
150
402
354
400
175.0
1,932
4 7
3 TSF
DU
DU
DU
TSF
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
Rooms
TSF
DU
DU
DU
DU

URBAN CROSSROADS

1.1-9
12-417

URBAN CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
LEGEND:

EXHIBIT 6: CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP
O = CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT ID
15868 - Scope.dwg

1.1-10
12-418

City of Rancho Mirage
April 2, 2024

Page 11 of 11 ends

SPECIAL ISSUES
The following issues will also be addressed as part of the Traffic Analysis (TA):
• Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis: Signal warrant analysis will be prepared for all unsignalized study area intersections that allow for full access (no traffic signal warrants to be performed for restricted access locations due to infeasibility of installing a signal at these types of locations).
• Queuing Analysis: The analysis will identify the necessary lengths of turn pockets with storage at Project Access points, as well as the appropriate turn pocket transitions which adhere to the General Plan roadway classifications for the site adjacent roadways.

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
The VMT screening assessment has been prepared under separate cover (dated April 2, 2024) in accordance with SB743 and consistent with the methodology and thresholds outlined in the City of Rancho Mirage Transportation Analysis Policy (Revised February 18, 2021).

Please review this scoping agreement let us know if it is acceptable, or if the City requests any changes to this proposed scope of work. If you have any questions, please contact John Kain at (949) 375-2435 or Marlie Whiteman (714) 585-0574.

Respectfully submitted,
URBAN CROSSROADS, INC.

A�+�—.

John Kain, AICP
Principal
197 Marlie Whiteman, PE
Senior Associate
lat=„)

URBAN CROSSROADS
12-419

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
15868-04 TA Report.docx

1.1-12
12-420

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
APPENDIX 3.1: TRAFFIC COUNTS - APRIL 2024
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-421

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-422

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Key Largo Avenue
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 01_RNM_Key L_Dinah AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 1
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Key Largo Avenue
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left 1
Thru
App. Total
Left
Right
App. Total
Thru
Right 1
App. Total
Int. Total
07:00 AM
6 89
95 3
4 7
77 3
80 182
07:15 AM
11 107
118
4 9
13 89
2 91
222
07:30 AM
10 108
118
6 8
14 143
9 152
284
07:45 AM
19 116
135
4 8
12 159
9 168
315
Total
46 420
466
17 29
46 468
23 491
1003
08:00 AM
24 124
148
1 9
10 142
4 146
304
08:15 AM
25 126
151
3 10
13 165
12 177
341
08:30 AM
20 116
136
1 6
7 169
9 178
321
08:45 AM
12 103
115
4 2
6 191
5 196
317
Total
81 469
550
9 27
36 667
30 697
1283
Grand Total
127
889
1016
26 56
82 1135
53 1188
2286
Apprch %

12.5 87.5

31.7 68.3

95.5 4.5
Total %

5.6 38.9

44.4 1.1

2.4 3.6 49.7

2.3 52
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Key Largo Avenue
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left Thru App. Total
Left Right App. Total
Thru Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM
24 124
148
1 9
10 142
4 146
304
08:15 AM
25 126
151
3 10
13 165
12 177
341
08:30 AM
20 116
136
1 6
7 169
9 178
321
08:45 AM
12 103
115
4 2
6 191
5 196
317
Total Volume
81 469
550
9 27
36 667
30 697
1283
%o App. Total

14.7 85.3
25 75

95.7 4.3
P H F
.810
.931
.911
.563
.675
.692
.873
.625
.889
.941
Int. Total

3.1-1
12-423

r —
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Key Largo Avenue
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 01_RNM_Key L_Dinah AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
co
0 m
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
Total Volume
111
4 r♦
Left Right
9 271
36 147
Out In Total
KPv I arnn AvPni is
2 -rx
rn
m
co
0 0
N
A
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 07:45 AM
07:15 AM
i 08:00 AM
+0 mins.
19 116
135
4 9
13 142
4 146
+15 mins.
24 124
148
6 8
14 165
12 177
+30 mins.
25 126
151
4 8
12 169
9 178
+45 mins.
20 116
136
1 9
10 191
5 196
Total Volume
88 482
570
15 34
49 667
30 697
% App. Total

15.4 84.6

30.6 69.4

95.7 4.3
PHF
.880
.956
.944
.625
.944
.875
.873
.625
.889

3.1-2
12-424

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Key Largo Avenue
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 01_RNM_Key L_Dinah PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 1
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Key Largo Avenue
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
App. Total
Left
Right
App. Total
Thru
Right 1
App. Total
Int. Total
04:00 PM
14 238
252
3 10
13 222
7 229
494
04:15 PM
7 223
230
6 16
22 196
4 200
452
04:30 PM
6 221
227
4 24
28 188
5 193
448
04:45 PM
8 196
204
1 10
11 202
9 211
426
Total
35 878
913
14 60
74 808
25 833
1820
05:00 PM
8 204
212
3 29
32 228
3 231
475
05:15 PM
6 203
209
1 16
17 190
5 195
421
05:30 PM
4 178
182
2 12
14 149
4 153
349
05:45 PM
6 184
190
0 8
8 133
6 139
337
Total
24 769
793
6 65
71 700
18 718
1582
Grand Total
59 1647
1706
20 125
145
1508
43 1551
3402
Apprch %

3.5 96.5

13.8 86.2

97.2 2.8
Total %

1.7 48.4

50.1 0.6

3.7 4.3

44.3 1.3

45.6 Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Key Largo Avenue
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left Thru App. Total
Left Right App. Total
Thru Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM
14 238
252
3 10
13 222
7 229
494
04:15 PM
7 223
230
6 16
22 196
4 200
452
04:30 PM
6 221
227
4 24
28 188
5 193
448
04:45 PM
8 196
204
1 10
11 202
9 211
426
Total Volume
35 878
913
14 60
74 808
25 833
1820
%o App. Total

3.8 96.2

18.9 81.1
97 3
PHF
.625
.922
.906
.583
.625
.661
.910
.694
.909
.921
Int. Total

3.1-3
12-425

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Key Largo Avenue
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 01_RNM_Key L_Dinah PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
w
co
N
c—.74
oo
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
Total Volume
60 Left Right
14 601
74 134
Out In Total
KPv I arnn AvPni is
cn
co
co
W
O
5 o
0 0
O �
CO
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 04:00 PM
04:15 PM
04:15 PM
+0 mins.
14 238
252
6 16
22 196
4 200
+15 mins.
7 223
230
4 24
28 188
5 193
+30 mins.
6 221
227
1 10
11 202
9 211
+45 mins.
8 196
204
3 29
32 228
3 231
Total Volume
35 878
913
14 79
93 814
21 835
% App. Total

3.8 96.2

15.1 84.9

97.5 2.5
PHF
.625
.922
.906
.583
.681
.727
.893
.583
.904

3.1-4
12-426

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Key Largo Avenue
E/W: Via Vail
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 02_RNM_Key L_Via V AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 1
Key Largo Avenue
Southbound
Key Largo Avenue
Northbound
Via Vail
Eastbound
Start Time
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
App. Total
Left
Right 1
App. Total
Int. Total
07:00 AM
4 3
7 3
3 6
0 0
0 13
07:15 AM
3 10
13 0
6 6
3 0
3 22
07:30 AM
6 14
20 0
6 6
5 2
7 33
07:45 AM
4 21
25 2
5 7
5 2
7 39
Total
17 48
65 5
20 25
13 4
17 107
08:00 AM
5 21
26 1
2 3
6 1
7 36
08:15 AM
9 24
33 0
6 6
3 1
4 43
08:30 AM
7 23
30 3
2 5
5 0
5 40
08:45 AM
4 11
15 2
3 5
3 4
7 27
Total
25 79
104
6 13
19 17
6 23
146
Grand Total
42 127
169
11 33
44 30
10 40
253
Apprch %

24.9 75.1
25 75
75 25
Total %

16.6 50.2

66.8 4.3
13 17.4 11.9
4 15.8
Key Largo Avenue
Southbound
Key Largo Avenue
Northbound
Via Vail
Eastbound
Start Time
Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru App. Total
Left
Right
App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM
4 21
25 2
5 7
5 2
7 39
08:00 AM
5 21
26 1
2 3
6 1
7 36
08:15 AM
9 24
33 0
6 6
3 1
4 43
08:30 AM
7 23
30 3
2 5
5 0
5 40
Total Volume
25 89
114
6 15
21 19
4 23
158
%o App. Total

21.9 78.1

28.6 71.4

82.6 17.4
P H F
.694
.927
.864
.500
.625
.750
.792
.500
.821
.919
Int. Total

3.1-5
12-427

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Key Largo Avenue
E/W: Via Vail
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Key L_Via V AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
co
> E
a)
rn
O
rn
Key Largo Avenue
Out In Total
34 1141
89 25
Right Thru
148
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM
Total Volume
Left Thru
29 6 15
21 50
Out In Total
KPv I arnn AvPni IP
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 07:45 AM
07:00 AM
07:30 AM
+0 mins.
4 21
25 3
3 6
5 2
7 +15 mins.
5 21
26 0
6 6
5 2
7 +30 mins.
9 24
33 0
6 6
6 1
7 +45 mins.
7 23
30 2
5 7
3 1
4 Total Volume
25 89
114
5 20
25 19
6 25
% App. Total

21.9 78.1
20 80
76 24
PHF
.694
.927
.864
.417
.833
.893 .792
.750
.893

3.1-6
12-428

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Key Largo Avenue
E/W: Via Vail
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 02_RNM_Key L_Via V PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 1
Key Largo Avenue
Southbound
Key Largo Avenue
Northbound
Via Vail
Eastbound
Start Time
Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru
App. Total
Left
Right
App. Total
Int. Total
04:00 PM
8 14
22 1
5 6
7 1
8 36
04:15 PM
1 5
6 1
8 9
13 2
15 30
04:30 PM
3 7
10 0
2 2
23 2
25 37
04:45 PM
4 7
11 1
2 3
7 3
10 24
Total
16 33
49 3
17 20
50 8
58 127
05:00 PM
6 4
10 1
6 7
27 1
28 45
05:15 PM
1 8
9 0
7 7
13 1
14 30
05:30 PM
2 2
4 2
3 5
8 0
8 17
05:45 PM
1 6
7 2
1 3
8 0
8 18
Total
10 20
30 5
17 22
56 2
58 110
Grand Total
26 53
79 8
34 42
106
10 116
237
Apprch %

32.9 67.1
19 81

91.4 8.6
Total %
11 22.4

33.3 3.4

14.3 17.7

44.7 4.2

48.9 Key Largo Avenue
Southbound
Key Largo Avenue
Northbound
Via Vail
Eastbound
Start Time
Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru App. Total
Left
Right
App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM
1 5
6 1
8 9
13 2
15 30
04:30 PM
3 7
10 0
2 2
23 2
25 37
04:45 PM
4 7
11 1
2 3
7 3
10 24
05:00 PM
6 4
10 1
6 7
27 1
28 45
Total Volume
14 23
37 3
18 21
70 8
78 136
%o App. Total

37.8 62.2

14.3 85.7

89.7 10.3
P H F
.583
.821
.841
.750
.563
.583
.648
.667
.696
.756
Int. Total

3.1-7
12-429

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Key Largo Avenue
E/W: Via Vail
Weather: Clear
File Name : 02_RNM_Key L_Via V PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
0 0
0 "Tt t—
>
O
N
0 m
Key Largo Avenue
Out In Total
88 37
23 14
Righi Thru
125
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Total Volume
Left Thru
22 3 18
21 43
Out In Total
KPv I arnn AvPni is
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 04:00 PM
04:45 PM
04:15 PM
+0 mins.
8 14
22 1
2 3
13 2
15 +15 mins.
1 5
6 1
6 7
23 2
25 +30 mins.
3 7
10 0
7 7
7 3
10 +45 mins.
4 7
11 2
3 5
27 1
28 Total Volume
16 33
49 4
18 22
70 8
78 % App. Total

32.7 67.3

18.2 81.8

89.7 10.3
PHF
.500
.589
.557
.500
.643
.786
.648
.667
.696

3.1-8
12-430

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Miriam Way/George Montgomery
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 03_RNM_Mir_Dinah AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No :1
Miriam Way
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
George Montgomery
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right . App. Total
Left
Thru 1 Right
App. Total
Left . Thru
Right 1 App. Total
1 Left
Thru , Right
App. Total
Int. Total 11
07:00 AM
0 0
1 1
1 98 1
100
0 0
4 4
4 73 6
83 188
07:15 AM
2 0
1 3
3 115
5 123
3 0
0 3
3 88
5 96
225
07:30 AM
4 0
4 8
1 130
1 132
3 0
3 6
9 127
7 143
289
07:45 AM
0 1
0 1
5 136
4 145
6 0
1 7
15 136
8 159
312
Total
6 1
6 13
10 479
11 500
12 0
8 20
31 424
26 481
1014
08:00 AM
2 0
7 9
3 156
4 163
3 0
3 6
5 141
6 152
330
08:15 AM
2 0
3 5
3 143
2 148
3 0
3 6
5 151
9 165
324
08:30 AM
1 2
5 8
2 131
0 133
5 1
3 9
12 158
10 180
330
08:45 AM
3 0
8 11
3 93
1 97
7 0
1 8
6 166
18 190
306
Total
8 2
23 33
11 523
7 541
18 1
10 29
28 616
43 687
1290
Grand Total
14 3
29 46
21 1002
18 1041
30 1
18 49
59 1040
69 1168
2304
Apprch %

30.4 6.5
63 2

96.3 1.7

61.2 2

36.7 5.1
89 5.9
Total %

0.6 0.1

1.3 2

0.9 43.5

0.8 45.2

1.3 0

0.8 2.1

2.6 45.1
3 50.7
Miriam Way
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
George Montgomery
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left 1 Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru 1 Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM
0 1
0 1
5 136
4 145
6 0
1 7
15 136
8 159
312
08:00 AM
2 0
7 9
3 156
4 163
3 0
3 6
5 141
6 152
330
08:15 AM
2 0
3 5
3 143
2 148
3 0
3 6
5 151
9 165
324
08:30 AM
1 2
5 8
2 131
0 133
5 1
3 9
12 158
10 180
330
Total Volume
5 3
15 23
13 566
10 589
17 1
10 28
37 586
33 656
1296
% App. Total

21.7 13

65.2 2.2

96.1 1.7

60.7 3.6

35.7 5.6

89.3 5
PHF
.625
.375
.536
.639
.650
.907
.625
.903
.708
.250
.833
.778
.617
.927
.825
.911
.982
Int. Total

3.1-9
12-431

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Miriam Way/George Montgomery
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 03_RNM_Mir_Dinah AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
N
O F
O co
CD Lo
E co
c
.c
co
L)
M
CO
h
Miriam Way
Out In Total
48 23]
71 15
3 5
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM
Total Volume
T
Left Thru Right
17 281
49 10
77 Out In Total
C;t nrnp Mnntnnmary
4 s
c
0 0,
0)
0)
0)
0 0)
0)
co
0)
m
v
0 CO
O
a
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
08:00 AM
07:45 AM
08:00 AM
08:00 AM
+0 mins.
2 0
7 9
5 136
4 145
3 0
3 6
5 141
6 152
+15 mins.
2 0
3 5
3 156
4 163
3 0
3 6
5 151
9 165
+30 mins.
1 2
5 8
3 143
2 148
5 1
3 9
12 158
10 180
+45 mins.
3 0
8 11
2 131
0 133
7 0
1 8
6 166
18 190
Total Volume
8 2
23 33
13 566
10 589
18 1
10 29
28 616
43 687
% App. Total

24.2 6.1

69.7 2.2

96.1 1.7

62.1 3.4

34.5 4.1

89.7 6.3
PHF
.667
.250
.719
.750
.650
.907
.625
.903
.643
.250
.833
.806
.583
.928
.597
.904

3.1-10
12-432

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Miriam Way/George Montgomery
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 03_RNM_Mir_Dinah PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No :1
Miriam Way
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
George Montgomery
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right . App. Total
Left
Thru 1 Right
App. Total
Left . Thru
Right 1 App. Total
1 Left
Thru , Right
App. Total
Int. Total
04:00 PM
4 1
40 45
7 210 2
219
16 1
12 29
18 206 15
239
532
04:15 PM
3 0
28 31
8 176
3 187
15 0
13 28
19 173
16 208
454
04:30 PM
7 3
30 40
11 180
3 194
31 1
20 52
14 178
16 208
494
04:45 PM
3 2
30 35
17 159
0 176
8 1
10 19
13 163
22 198
428
Total
17 6
128
151
43 725
8 776
70 3
55 128
64 720
69 853
1908
05:00 PM
2 0
20 22
19 195
3 217
14 0
11 25
15 226
12 253
517
05:15 PM
3 2
23 28
13 167
2 182
9 1
15 25
13 148
17 178
413
05:30 PM
3 1
15 19
6 172
2 180
4 2
11 17
11 169
15 195
411
05:45 PM
2 0
19 21
11 164
0 175
11 2
16 29
8 112
15 135
360
Total
10 3
77 90
49 698
7 754
38 5
53 96
47 655
59 761
1701
Grand Total
27 9
205
241
92 1423
15 1530
108
8 108
224
111
1375
128
1614
3609
Apprch %

11.2 3.7

85.1 6
93 1

48.2 3.6

48.2 6.9

85.2 7.9
Total %

0.7 0.2

5.7 6.7

2.5 39.4

0.4 42.4
3 0.2
3 6.2

3.1 38.1

3.5 44.7
Miriam Way
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
George Montgomery
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left 1 Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru 1 Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM
4 1
40 45
7 210
2 219
16 1
12 29
18 206
15 239
532
04:15 PM
3 0
28 31
8 176
3 187
15 0
13 28
19 173
16 208
454
04:30 PM
7 3
30 40
11 180
3 194
31 1
20 52
14 178
16 208
494
04:45 PM
3 2
30 35
17 159
0 176
8 1
10 19
13 163
22 198
428
Total Volume
17 6
128
151
43 725
8 776
70 3
55 128
64 720
69 853
1908
% App. Total

11.3 4

84.8 5.5

93.4 1

54.7 2.3
43 7.5

84.4 8.1
PHF
.607
.500
.800
.839
.632
.863
.667
.886
.565
.750
.688
.615
.842
.874
.784
.892
.897
Int. Total

3.1-11
12-433

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Miriam Way/George Montgomery
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 03_RNM_Mir_Dinah PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
co
N -
N
rn
CO
N
0)
Miriam Way
Out In Total
75 151]
226
128
6 17
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
Total Volume
T
Left Thru Right
70 3
55 118
1281
246
Out In Total
C;t nrnp Mnntnmmpry
0)
(TI
0)
0)
0)
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM
04:00 PM
04:00 PM
04:15 PM
+0 mins.
4 1
40 45
7 210
2 219
16 1
12 29
19 173
16 208
+15 mins.
3 0
28 31
8 176
3 187
15 0
13 28
14 178
16 208
+30 mins.
7 3
30 40
11 180
3 194
31 1
20 52
13 163
22 198
+45 mins.
3 2
30 35
17 159
0 176
8 1
10 19
15 226
12 253
Total Volume
17 6
128
151
43 725
8 776
70 3
55 128
61 740
66 867
% App. Total

11.3 4

84.8 5.5

93.4 1

54.7 2.3
43 7

85.4 7.6
PHF
.607
.500
.800
.839
.632
.863
.667
.886
.565
.750
.688
.615
.803
.819
.750
.857

3.1-12
12-434

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Shoppers Lane
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 04_RNM_Shop_Dinah AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 1
Shoppers Lane
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Shoppers Lane
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right . App. Total
Left
Thru 1 Right
App. Total
Left . Thru
Right
App. Total
Left
Thru , Right
App. Total
Int. Total
07:00 AM
32 2
10 44
4 76 15
95 12
0 4
16 6
57 11
74 229
07:15 AM
19 0
9 28
3 115
25 143
5 2
5 12
8 75
8 91
274
07:30 AM
33 5
8 46
8 108
17 133
7 3
11 21
14 107
19 140
340
07:45 AM
33 3
8 44
12 140
44 196
12 1
7 20
17 95
15 127
387
Total
117
10 35
162
27 439
101
567
36 6
27 69
45 334
53 432
1230
08:00 AM
30 1
10 41
13 128
22 163
14 2
6 22
13 129
8 150
376
08:15 AM
31 1
12 44
12 121
23 156
19 4
14 37
11 111
16 138
375
08:30 AM
47 0
6 53
8 110
22 140
16 2
15 33
24 144
12 180
406
08:45 AM
43 6
12 61
23 79
27 129
10 3
11 24
19 122
19 160
374
Total
151
8 40
199
56 438
94 588
59 11
46 116
67 506
55 628
1531
Grand Total
268
18 75
361
83 877
195
1155
95 17
73 185
112
840
108
1060
2761
Apprch %

74.2 5

20.8 7.2

75.9 16.9

51.4 9.2

39.5 10.6

79.2 10.2
Total %

9.7 0.7

2.7 13.1
3 31.8

7.1 41.8

3.4 0.6

2.6 6.7

4.1 30.4

3.9 38.4
Shoppers Lane
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Shoppers Lane
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left 1 Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru 1 Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 07:45 AM
07:45 AM
33 3
8 44
12 140
44 196
12 1
7 20
17 95
15 127
387
08:00 AM
30 1
10 41
13 128
22 163
14 2
6 22
13 129
8 150
376
08:15 AM
31 1
12 44
12 121
23 156
19 4
14 37
11 111
16 138
375
08:30 AM
47 0
6 53
8 110
22 140
16 2
15 33
24 144
12 180
406
Total Volume
141
5 36
182
45 499
111
655
61 9
42 112
65 479
51 595
1544
% App. Total

77.5 2.7

19.8 6.9

76.2 16.9

54.5 8

37.5 10.9

80.5 8.6
PHF
.750
.417
.750
.858
.865
.891
.631
.835
.803
.563
.700
.757
.677
.832
.797
.826
.951
Int. Total

3.1-13
12-435

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Shoppers Lane
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 04_RNM_Shop_Dinah AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
rn
Shoppers Lane
Out In Total
185
182
367
36 5
141
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM
Total Volume
T
Left Thru Right
61 9
42 101
112
213
Out In Total
ShnnnPre 1 ane
4 c
co
01 N
—01
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
08:00 AM
107:45 AM
08:00 AM
08:00 AM
+0 mins.
30 1
10 41 12
140
44 196
14 2
6 22
13 129
8 150
+15 mins.
31 1
12 44
13 128
22 163
19 4
14 37
11 111
16 138
+30 mins.
47 0
6 53
12 121
23 156
16 2
15 33
24 144
12 180
+45 mins.
43 6
12 61
8 110
22 140
10 3
11 24
19 122
19 160
Total Volume
151
8 40
199
45 499
111
655
59 11
46 116
67 506
55 628
% App. Total

75.9 4

20.1 6.9

76.2 16.9

50.9 9.5

39.7 10.7

80.6 8.8
PHF
.803
.333
.833
.816
.865
.891
.631
.835
.776
.688
.767
.784
.698
.878
.724
.872

3.1-14
12-436

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Shoppers Lane
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 04_RNM_Shop_Dinah PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 1
Shoppers Lane
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Shoppers Lane
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right . App. Total
Left
Thru 1 Right
App. Total
Left . Thru
Right 1 App. Total
Left
Thru
Right
App. Total
Int. Total 11
04:00 PM
121
9 27 157
19 152 48
219
23 9
31 63
26 172
18 216
655
04:15 PM
105
3 27
135
25 140
37 202
32 9
29 70
31 146
11 188
595
04:30 PM
130
8 32
170
13 144
49 206
8 9
25 42
43 167
11 221
639
04:45 PM
98 12
38 148
27 134
53 214
14 7
27 48
28 122
18 168
578
Total
454
32 124
610
84 570
187
841
77 34
112
223
128
607
58 793
2467
05:00 PM
128
9 31
168
24 156
40 220
19 5
18 42
33 192
20 245
675
05:15 PM
100
7 31
138
29 129
38 196
29 13
28 70
32 122
19 173
577
05:30 PM
102
8 25
135
21 134
32 187
7 5
24 36
32 142
5 179
537
05:45 PM
92 8
32 132
21 123
35 179
23 8
24 55
19 95
8 122
488
Total
422
32 119
573
95 542
145
782
78 31
94 203
116
551
52 719
2277
Grand Total
876
64 243
1183
179
1112
332
1623
155
65 206
426
244
1158
110
1512
4744
Apprch %
74 5.4

20.5 11

68.5 20.5

36.4 15.3

48.4 16.1

76.6 7.3
Total %

18.5 1.3

5.1 24.9

3.8 23.4
7 34.2

3.3 1.4

4.3 9

5.1 24.4

2.3 31.9
Shoppers Lane
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Shoppers Lane
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left 1 Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru 1 Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM
105
3 27
135
25 140
37 202
32 9
29 70
31 146
11 188
595
04:30 PM
130
8 32
170
13 144
49 206
8 9
25 42
43 167
11 221
639
04:45 PM
98 12
38 148
27 134
53 214
14 7
27 48
28 122
18 168
578
05:00 PM
128
9 31
168
24 156
40 220
19 5
18 42
33 192
20 245
675
Total Volume
461
32 128
621
89 574
179
842
73 30
99 202
135
627
60 822
2487
% App. Total

74.2 5.2

20.6 10.6

68.2 21.3

36.1 14.9
49 16.4

76.3 7.3
PHF
.887
.667
.842
.913
.824
.920
.844
.957
.570
.833
.853
.721
.785
.816
.750
.839
.921
Int. Total

3.1-15
12-437

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Shoppers Lane
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 04_RNM_Shop_Dinah PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
m
Shoppers Lane
Out In Total
344
621
965
128
32 461
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Total Volume
T
Left Thru Right
73 30
99 181
202
383
Out In Total
ShnnnPre 1 ane
4 c
C01
O
O
CO
a
5 o
1,3

N
co
Fe'
v
o m
iv
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Be ins at:
04:30 PM
04:15 PM
04:00 PM
04:15 PM
+0 mins.
130
8 32
170 25
140
37 202
23 9
31 63
31 146
11 188
+15 mins.
98 12
38 148
13 144
49 206
32 9
29 70
43 167
11 221
+30 mins.
128
9 31
168
27 134
53 214
8 9
25 42
28 122
18 168
+45 mins.
100
7 31
138
24 156
40 220
14 7
27 48
33 192
20 245
Total Volume
456
36 132
624
89 574
179
842
77 34
112
223
135
627
60 822
% App. Total

73.1 5.8

21.2 10.6

68.2 21.3

34.5 15.2

50.2 16.4

76.3 7.3
PHF
.877
.750
.868
.918
.824
.920
.844
.957
.602
.944
.903
.796
.785
.816
.750
.839

3.1-16
12-438

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Monterey Avenue
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 05_RNM_Mon_Dinah AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 1
Monterey Avenue
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Monterey Avenue
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right . App. Total
Left
Thru 1 Right
App. Total
Left . Thru
Right 1 App. Total
1 Left
Thru , Right
App. Total
Int. Total 11
07:00 AM
74 240
70 384
13 39 52
104
19 77
4 100
52 30 24
106
694
07:15 AM
106
232
101
439
7 45
67 119
24 96
3 123
45 27
24 96
777
07:30 AM
106
355
97 558
6 50
64 120
23 75
9 107
72 65
30 167
952
07:45 AM
133
382
122
637
18 60
64 142
35 98
3 136
54 62
29 145
1060
Total
419
1209
390
2018
44 194
247
485
101
346
19 466 223
184
107
514
3483
08:00 AM
117
301
105
523
15 57
65 137
32 91
8 131
62 78
45 185
976
08:15 AM
112
309
105
526
22 61
77 160
25 103
9 137
67 46
52 165
988
08:30 AM
56 269
78 403
22 55
80 157
38 104
8 150
80 84
56 220
930
08:45 AM
91 294
76 461
18 50
78 146
34 118
10 162
73 65
54 192
961
Total
376
1173
364
1913
77 223
300
600
129
416
35 580
282
273
207
762
3855
Grand Total
795
2382
754
3931
121
417
547
1085
230
762
54 1046
505
457
314
1276
7338
Apprch %

20.2 60.6

19.2 11.2

38.4 50.4
22 72.8

5.2 39.6

35.8 24.6
Total %

10.8 32.5

10.3 53.6

1.6 5.7

7.5 14.8

3.1 10.4

0.7 14.3

6.9 6.2

4.3 17.4
Monterey Avenue
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Monterey Avenue
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left 1 Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru 1 Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM
106
355
97 558
6 50
64 120
23 75
9 107
72 65
30 167
952
07:45 AM
133
382
122
637
18 60
64 142
35 98
3 136
54 62
29 145
1060
08:00 AM
117
301
105
523
15 57
65 137
32 91
8 131
62 78
45 185
976
08:15 AM
112
309
105
526
22 61
77 160
25 103
9 137
67 46
52 165
988
Total Volume
468
1347
429
2244
61 228
270
559
115
367
29 511
255
251
156
662
3976
% App. Total

20.9 60

19.1 10.9

40.8 48.3

22.5 71.8

5.7 38.5

37.9 23.6
P H F
.880
.882
.879
.881
.693
.934
.877
.873
.821
.891
.806
.932
.885
.804
.750
.895
.938
Int. Total

3.1-17
12-439

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Monterey Avenue
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 05_RNM_Mon_Dinah AM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
,f)
u0
N
CO
i5
Monterey Avenue
Out In Total
892
2244
3136
429
1347
468
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
T
Left Thru Right
115
367
1564
Out In Total
Mnnterav Avenues
511
29 2075
4 s
C
O
0 N
co
0)
co
_th
co
CA)
0 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Be ins at:
07:30 AM
08:00 AM
08:00 AM
08:00 AM
+0 mins.
106
355
97 558
15 57
65 137
32 91
8 131 62
78 45
185
+15 mins.
133
382
122
637
22 61
77 160
25 103
9 137
67 46
52 165
+30 mins.
117
301
105
523
22 55
80 157
38 104
8 150
80 84
56 220
+45 mins.
112
309
105
526
18 50
78 146
34 118
10 162
73 65
54 192
Total Volume
468
1347
429
2244
77 223
300
600
129
416
35 580
282
273
207
762
% App. Total

20.9 60

19.1 12.8

37.2 50

22.2 71.7
6 37

35.8 27.2
PHF
.880
.882
.879
.881
.875
.914
.938
.938
.849
.881
.875
.895
.881
.813
.924
.866

3.1-18
12-440

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Monterey Avenue
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
File Name : 05_RNM_Mon_Dinah PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 1
Monterey Avenue
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Monterey Avenue
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left
Thru
Right . App. Total
Left
Thru I Right
App. Total
Left . Thru
Right I App. Total
1 Left
Thru , Right
App. Total
Int. Total
04:00 PM
83 169
73 325
25 114 131
270
90 229
9 328
157
103 75
335
1258
04:15 PM
80 197
89 366
14 81
133
228
90 246
9 345
135
85 83
303
1242
04:30 PM
82 165
88 335
12 107
157
276
85 206
8 299
154
109
76 339
1249
04:45 PM
101
204
97 402
19 78
156
253
82 250
11 343
130
73 69
272
1270
Total
346
735
347
1428
70 380
577
1027
347
931
37 1315
576
370
303
1249
5019
05:00 PM
83 192
95 370
12 87
160
259
87 223
10 320
156
111
86 353
1302
05:15 PM
113
217
93 423
14 82
129
225
93 293
4 390
107
88 60
255
1293
05:30 PM
75 178
79 332
19 89
124
232
68 214
4 286
136
104
68 308
1158
05:45 PM
85 172
89 346
15 59
116
190
83 197
11 291
96 65
49 210
1037
Total
356
759
356
1471
60 317
529
906
331
927
29 1287
495
368
263
1126
4790
Grand Total
702
1494
703
2899
130
697
1106
1933
678
1858
66 2602
1071
738
566
2375
9809
Apprch %

24.2 51.5

24.2 6.7

36.1 57.2

26.1 71.4

2.5 45.1

31.1 23.8
Total %

7.2 15.2

7.2 29.6

1.3 7.1

11.3 19.7

6.9 18.9

0.7 26.5

10.9 7.5

5.8 24.2
Monterey Avenue
Southbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Westbound
Monterey Avenue
Northbound
Dinah Shore Drive
Eastbound
Start Time
Left I Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru Right App. Total
Left Thru I Right App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Be ins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM
82 165
88 335
12 107
157
276
85 206
8 299
154
109
76 339
1249
04:45 PM
101
204
97 402
19 78
156
253
82 250
11 343
130
73 69
272
1270
05:00 PM
83 192
95 370
12 87
160
259
87 223
10 320
156
111
86 353
1302
05:15 PM
113
217
93 423
14 82
129
225
93 293
4 390
107
88 60
255
1293
Total Volume
379
778
373
1530
57 354
602
1013
347
972
33 1352
547
381
291
1219
5114
% App. Total

24.8 50.8

24.4 5.6

34.9 59.4

25.7 71.9

2.4 44.9

31.3 23.9
PHF
.838
.896
.961
.904
.750
.827
.941
.918
.933
.829
.750
.867
.877
.858
.846
.863
.982
Int. Total

3.1-19
12-441

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
City of Rancho Mirage
N/S: Monterey Avenue
E/W: Dinah Shore Drive
Weather: Clear
File Name : 05_RNM_Mon_Dinah PM
Site Code : 05124316
Start Date : 4/9/2024
Page No : 2
M
N
M
rn
N
Monterey Avenue
Out In Total
2121
1530
3651
373
778
379
Right Thru Left
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
T
Left Thru Right
347
972
1126
Out In Total
Mnnterev Avenues
1352
33 2478
4 s
1 0
N
A
CO
W
O
O
W
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Be ins at:
04:30 PM
04:00 PM
04:30 PM
04:15 PM
+0 mins.
82 165
88 335
25 114
131
270
85 206
8 299
135
85 83
303
+15 mins.
101
204
97 402
14 81
133
228
82 250
11 343
154
109
76 339
+30 mins.
83 192
95 370
12 107
157
276
87 223
10 320
130
73 69
272
+45 mins.
113
217
93 423
19 78
156
253
93 293
4 390
156
111
86 353
Total Volume
379
778
373
1530
70 380
577
1027
347
972
33 1352
575
378
314
1267
% App. Total

24.8 50.8

24.4 6.8
37 56.2

25.7 71.9

2.4 45.4

29.8 24.8
PHF
.838
.896
.961
.904 .700
.833
.919
.930
.933
.829
.750
.867
.921
.851
.913
.897

3.1-20
12-442

City of Rancho Mirage
Dinah Shore Drive
E/ Key Largo Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Page 1 ends

RNM002
Site Code: 051-24316
Start 4/9/2024 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 248
12:15 5 209
12:30 2 185
12:45 2 202
01:00 4 204
01:15 4 187
01:30 4 202
01:45 6 211
02:00 6 236
02:15 1 202
02:30 4 214
02:45 4 197
03:00 3 211
03:15 4 227
03:30 4 189
03:45 12 226
04:00 5 232
04:15 7 212
04:30 11 212
04:45 17 212
05:00 13 257
05:15 19 206
05:30 23 161
05:45 31 141
06:00 31 163
06:15 49 146
06:30 64 122
06:45 90 124
07:00 81 117
07:15 98 111
07:30 151 103
07:45 167 93
08:00 151 75
08:15 175 73
08:30 175 40
08:45 193 39
09:00 137 44
09:15 167 42
09:30 183 36
09:45 220 23
10:00 188 26
10:15 202 16
10:30 187 21
10:45 199 18
11:00 204 10
11:15 228 10
11:30 211 9
11:45 219 11
11 844
18 804
15 849
23 853
40 868
86 765
234 555
497 424
694 227
707 145
776 81
862 40
7 204
6 223
3 246
4 230
4 203
2 208
6 210
5 199
2 224
2 236
2 218
4 233
4 236
4 239
4 222
7 239
3 252
9 230
13 227
18 204
18 212
22 209
28 182
31 190
52 174
42 172
60 138
78 149
95 145
118 119
119 130
135 112
148 130
151 120
136 105
115 87
115 101
117 65
109 66
116 55
133 51
159 43
197 24
172 16
194 25
217 24
194 13
212 12
20 903
17 820
10 911
19 936
43 913
99 793
232 633
467 506
550 442
457 287
661 134
817 74
31 1747
35 1624
25 1760
42 1789
83 1781
185 1558
466 1188
964 930
1244 669
1164 432
1437 215
1679 114
Total 3963 6455 3963 6455 3392 7352 3392 7352 7355 13807 Combined 10418 10418 10744 10744 21162
Total
AM Peak 11:00 - 11:00 -
Vol. 862 - 817
P.H.F. 0.945 0.941
PM Peak - 04:15 - - 03:15 -
Vol. - 893 - - 952 -
P.H.F. 0.869 0.944
Percentag
e

38.0% 62.0% 31.6% 68.4%

ADT/AADT
ADT 21,162 AADT 21,162

3.1-21
12-443

City of Rancho Mirage
Key Largo Avenue
S/ Dinah Shore Drive
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Page 1 ends

RNM001
Site Code: 051-24316
Start 4/9/2024 Northbound Hour Totals
Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon
12:00 0 17
12:15 0 21
12:30 0 17
12:45 0 15
01:00 0 7
01:15 0 15
01:30 0 15
01:45 1 10
02:00 0 7
02:15 0 13
02:30 0 11
02:45 0 12
03:00 0 13
03:15 0 17
03:30 1 19
03:45 1 16
04:00 0 13
04:15 0 22
04:30 0 28
04:45 0 11
05:00 0 32
05:15 0 17
05:30 0 14
05:45 2 8
06:00 1 11
06:15 2 11
06:30 7 6
06:45 15 9
07:00 7 6
07:15 13 13
07:30 14 7
07:45 12 8
08:00 10 1
08:15 13 6
08:30 7 1
08:45 6 4
09:00 17 4
09:15 18 3
09:30 19 1
09:45 5 0
10:00 11 1
10:15 21 0
10:30 12 0
10:45 28 1
11:00 15 1
11:15 19 0
11:30 15 1
11:45 23 0
0 70
1 47
0 43
2 65
0 74
2 71
25 37
46 34
36 12
59 8
72 2
72 2
Southbound
Hour Totals Combined Totals
Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon
0 18
0 19
0 31
0 16
1 19
1 10
0 9
1 9
0 11
1 18
0 9
0 10
0 17
2 15
0 13
0 14
0 21
0 11
0 11
0 17
1 11
1 11
2 8
2 12
9 8
8 14
16 7
17 11
9 7
13 7
19 5
28 2
28 7
37 5
29 5
17 1
12 4
16 1
8 0
18 4
8 2
12 0
15 1
9 0
11 0
12 0
13 1
17 1
0 84
3 47
1 48
2 59
0 60
6 42
50 40
69 21
111 18
54 9
44 3
53 2
Morning Afternoon
0 154
4 94
1 91
4 124
0 134
8 113
75 77
115 55
147 30
113 17
116 5
125 4
Total 315 465 315 465 393 433 393 433 708 898
Combined 780 780 826 826 1606
Total
AM Peak 10:45 - 07:45
Vol. 77 - 122
P.H.F. 0.688 0.824
PM Peak - 04:15 - - 00:15
Vol. - 93 - - 85
P.H.F. 0.727 0.685
Percentag
e

40.4% 59.6% 47.6% 52.4%

ADT/AADT
ADT 1,606 AADT 1,606

3.1-22
12-444

City of Rancho Mirage
Monterey Avenue
N/ Dinah Shore Drive
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Page 1 ends

RNM003
Site Code: 051-24316
Start 4/9/2024 Northbound
Time Tue Morning Afternoon
12:00 16 411
12:15 17 411
12:30 16 435
12:45 15 395
01:00 11 421
01:15 7 414
01:30 8 452
01:45 7 442
02:00 9 468
02:15 7 461
02:30 8 476
02:45 4 471
03:00 5 528
03:15 7 516
03:30 12 524
03:45 12 514
04:00 17 517
04:15 19 514
04:30 20 517
04:45 27 536
05:00 26 539
05:15 38 529
05:30 49 474
05:45 64 409
06:00 91 445
06:15 98 410
06:30 143 342
06:45 151 312
07:00 181 321
07:15 208 302
07:30 211 307
07:45 216 290
08:00 218 283
08:15 247 257
08:30 264 212
08:45 269 248
09:00 277 233
09:15 244 163
09:30 257 175
09:45 266 127
10:00 295 143
10:15 331 103
10:30 306 78
10:45 323 70
11:00 364 77
11:15 331 51
11:30 351 41
11:45 340 36
Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals
Morning Afternoon
64 1652
33 1729
28 1876
36 2082
83 2084
177 1951
483 1509
816 1220
998 1000
1044 698
1255 394
1386 205
Morning Afternoon
18 344
18 448
13 413
11 400
12 342
9 364
9 367
11 404
7 337
10 399
11 353
8 417
12 363
12 382
24 265
56 369
31 325
32 366
50 335
106 402
66 370
98 423
131 332
153 346
189 304
245 299
339 230
460 257
384 224
439 202
558 165
637 179
523 110
526 130
403 116
461 81
388 109
435 69
406 74
477 73
317 66
357 56
388 47
446 52
363 41
427 41
398 31
413 25
Morning Afternoon
60 1605
41 1477
36 1506
104 1379
219 1428
448 1471
1233 1090
2018 770
1913 437
1706 325
1508 221
1601 138
Morning Afternoon
124 3257
74 3206
64 3382
140 3461
302 3512
625 3422
1716 2599
2834 1990
2911 1437
2750 1023
2763 615
2987 343
Total 6403 16400 6403 16400 10887 11847 10887 11847 17290 28247 Combined 22803 22803 22734 22734 45537
Total
AM Peak 11:00 - 07:30 -
Vol. 1386 - 2244
P.H.F. 0.952 0.881
PM Peak - 04:30 - - 12:00 -
Vol. - 2121 - - 1605 -
P.H.F. 0.984 0.896
Percentag 28.1% 71.9% 47.9% 52.1%
e

ADT/AADT
ADT 45,537 AADT 45,537

3.1-23
12-445

URBAN CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
15868-04 TA Report.docx

3.1-24
12-446

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
APPENDIX 3.2: EXISTING (2024) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION

OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-447

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-448

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour
1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
p
Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 700 32 85 492 9 28
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 145 0 150 0 55
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
1 1 700 32 85 492 9 28
449 1296 688

6.8 19.6 15.6
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 8
Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 3 8
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 22.5

14.5 23.0 14.5 23.0 22.5 22.5

24.2% 38.3% 24.2% 38.3% 37.5% 37.5%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead Lag Lead Lag
Yes Yes
None C -Max
Yes Yes
None C -Max Max Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
A
ctuated Cycle Length: 60
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases:
1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-1
12-449

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
f
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
1 Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 700 32 85 492 9 28
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 745 34 90 523 10 30
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
idt14 I ttst r
1 700 32 85 492 9 28
0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 1729 79 231 2808 534 476
Arrive On Green 0.35 0.35 0.09 0.37 0.30 0.30
2 2 2 2 2 2
Sat Flow, veh/h 5172 228 1781 5274 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 506 273 90 523 10 30
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1827 1781 1702 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 6.9 2.9 4.2 0.2 0.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s
Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h
V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.43 0.39 0.19 0.02 0.06
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1176 631 297 2808 534 476
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00

6.9 6.9 2.9 4.2 0.2 0.8

0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00
1176 631 231 2808 534 476
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.1 15.1 25.2 9.8 14.8 15.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 2.2 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.3
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.4 2.7 1.2 1.2 0.1 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 16.2 17.3 26.2 10.0 14.8 15.2
LnGrp LOS B B C A BB
Approach Vol, veh/h 779 613 40
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.6 12.4 15.1
Approach LOS B B B
•
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.3 25.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 18.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 8.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.2 2.5 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 14.7
HCM 7th LOS B
1 2
6 8
1 37.5 22.5

18.5 18.0

6.2 2.8
Notes
User approved ignoring U -Turning movement.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-2
12-450

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 50
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 4 r 4 r
20 0 4 0 0 0 6 16 0 0 26 93
20 0 4 0 0 0 6 16 0 0 26 93
90 90 90 90
30 30 30 30
743 190 435 688

16.9 4.3 9.9 15.4
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Stop Free Free
ntersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_1560016000115800\15868\02LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-3
12-451

HCM 7th TWSC Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement

1.6 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 0 4 0 0 0 6 16 0 0 26 93
Future Vol, veh/h 20 0 4 0 0 0 6 16 0 0 26 93
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized
4+ 4 r 4 ri
1 - None - None - None - None
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 - 0
Grade, %
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
- 50 - 50
0 - - 0 - - 0 0
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 22 0 4 0 0 0 7 17 0 0 28 101
Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All 69 69 38 69 170 27 134 0 0 22 0 0
Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Stage 1 33 33 - 35 35
Stage 2 35 35 - 33 134
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 924 822 1034 924 723 1048 1450 - 1593 Stage 1 983 867 - 980 865
Stage 2 980 865 - 983 785
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 911 810 1024 907 713 1038 1443 - 1585 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 911 810 - 907 713
Stage 1 978 863 - 971 857
Stage 2 971 857 - 974 781
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s/v 8.99

HCM LOS
EB
WB
NB
SB
0 2.05
0 A
A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 491 - - 928 - 1585 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio

0.005 - - 0.028
HCM Control Delay (slveh) 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS
9 0 0

A A - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0
- 0.1
0 Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

Synchro 12 Report

3.2-4
12-452

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour
3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations i tti4 ' t41 if '1 "i t+
Traffic Volume (vph) 39 615 35 14 602 11 18 1 11 5 3 16 Future Volume (vph) 39 615 35 14 602 11 18 1 11 5 3 16
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 155 0 150 85 180 180 135 0
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 120 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1296 597 233 614

19.6 9.0 5.3 14.0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 20.0 53.0 19.0 52.0 52.0 21.0 29.0 19.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 44.2% 15.8% 43.3% 43.3% 17.5% 24.2% 15.8% 22.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-5
12-453

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations i t ' t41 ic '1 t II t+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 39 615 35 14 602 11 18 1 11 5 3 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 39 615 35 14 602 11 18 1 11 5 3 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40 628 36 14 614 11 18 1 11 5 3 16
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 212 2934 167 55 2877 891 67 28 310 23 48 255
Arrive On Green 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.19 0.19 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4941 282 1781 5106 1581 1781 133 1462 1781 255 1358 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 432 232 14 614 11 18 0 12 5 0 19 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1818 1781 1702 1581 1781 0 1595 1781 0 1613 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.84
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 212 2021 1080 55 2877 891 67 0 339 23 0 302 V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.25 0.21 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.00 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 446 2021 1080 215 2877 891 245 0 339 215 0 302 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.0 0.0 0.0 54.9 0.0 0.0 56.1 0.0 37.5 58.6 0.0 40.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.2 0.4 2.3 0.2 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.2 4.7 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackofQ(50%),veh/In 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 50.3 0.2 0.4 57.2 0.2 0.0 58.3 0.0 37.7 63.4 0.0 40.5 LnGrp LOS D A A E A A E D E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 704 639 30 24
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.1 1.4 50.0 45.2
Approach LOS A A D D
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 75.8 9.0 27.0 11.9 72.1 6.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.5 48.5 16.5 22.5 15.5 47.5 14.5 24.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 2.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.0 2.3 2.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 4.1
HCM 7th LOS A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-6
12-454

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour
4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.
t t
Lane Group
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Right Turn on Red
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5
Peak Hour Factor

EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
++t ittt rf
68 509 54 47 525 117
68 509 54 47 525 117
t
64 9 44 148 5 38
64 9 44 148 5 38
1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 125
2 120
45 0 160
0 1
120
Yes
45 115 145
1 0
90 Yes
30 145 110
0 0
90 Yes
30 110
1 Yes
597 738
224
460

9.0 11.2

5.1 10.5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA
Prot NA
5 2
1 6
3 8
7 4
Permitted Phases
6 Detector Phase
5 2
1 6 6 3 8
7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5

14.5 22.5

18.0 40.0 20.0 42.0 42.0 21.0 26.0

34.0 39.0

15.0% 33.3% 16.7% 35.0% 35.0% 17.5% 21.7%

28.3% 32.5%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5

4.5 4.5
Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
None C -Max None C -Max C -Max None Max
Lead Lag
Yes Yes
None Max
Intersection Summary
A
rea Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases:
4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-7
12-455

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ‘Iii ++t+ 'I ttst ic 'I I 11 111+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 509 54 47 525 117 64 9 44 148 5 38 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 509 54 47 525 117 64 9 44 148 5 38 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
72 536 57 49 553 123 67 9 46 156 5 40
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 262 1975 207 119 2105 651 133 68 348 187 511 453 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.84 0.84 0.07 0.41 0.41 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.29 0.29 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4691 493 1781 5106 1579 1781 265 1353 1781 1777 1577 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 72 387 206 49 553 123 67 0 55 156 5 40 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1780 1781 1702 1579 1781 0 1617 1781 1777 1577 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 2.8 2.9 3.2 8.6 6.0 4.3 0.0 3.1 10.3 0.2 2.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 2.8 2.9 3.2 8.6 6.0 4.3 0.0 3.1 10.3 0.2 2.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 262 1433 749 119 2105 651 133 0 416 187 511 453 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.41 0.26 0.19 0.51 0.00 0.13 0.83 0.01 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 389 1433 749 230 2105 651 245 0 416 438 511 453 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.0 5.7 5.7 53.7 23.2 22.5 53.4 0.0 34.3 52.7 30.5 31.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.5 0.9 2.1 0.3 0.6 3.0 0.0 0.7 9.3 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.5 3.4 2.3 2.1 0.0 1.3 5.1 0.1 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 48.5 6.2 6.6 55.8 23.5 23.1 56.4 0.0 35.0 62.0 30.6 31.6 LnGrp LOS
Approach Vol, veh/h 665 725 122 201
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.9 25.6 46.7 55.1
Approach LOS B C D E
0 D A A E C C E C E C C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.5 55.0 13.4 39.0 13.6 54.0 17.1 35.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 35.5 16.5 34.5 13.5 37.5 29.5 21.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 4.9 6.3 4.2 4.2 10.6 12.3 5.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.1 0.2 0.1 4.0 0.4 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 24.9
HCM 7th LOS C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-8
12-456

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour
5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 11) idt t + ' vi 1}+ r
Traffic Volume (vph) 268 264 164 64 239 284 121 385 30 491 1414 450 Future Volume (vph) 268 264 164 64 239 284 121 385 30 491 1414 450 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 0 155 175 255 0 175 190
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 120 120
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 50 50
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 738 479 794 571

11.2 7.3 10.8 7.8
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Free
7 4
3 8
5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
4 8 Free
Detector Phase
7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5

22.0 34.0 34.0 15.0 27.0 27.0 15.0 38.0 33.0 56.0

18.3% 28.3% 28.3% 12.5% 22.5% 22.5% 12.5% 31.7% 27.5% 46.7%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
None None None None None None None C -Max
Yes Yes
None C -Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 67 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
•
•
01 05
06 (R)
1 02 (R) 0a
07 04
08 1
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-9
12-457

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing (2024) AM Peak Hour 5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' r r + vi'i t1' r
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 268 264 164 64 239 284 121 385 30 491 1414 450 Future Volume (veh/h) 268 264 164 64 239 284 121 385 30 491 1414 450 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj.

Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 285 281 174 68 254 0 129 410 32 522 1504 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No No No No
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green 0.17 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.11 0.00 0.08 0.46 0.46 0.17 0.55 0.00 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
347 494 218 258 403 284 2233 172 602 2829
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1568 3456 3554 1585 3456 4833 373 3456 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 285 281 174 68 254 0 129 287 155 522 1504 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1777 1568 1728 1777 1585 1728 1702 1802 1728 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.6 8.4 12.6 2.2 8.2 0.0 4.3 5.9 6.1 17.6 22.3 0.

Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.6 8.4 12.6 2.2 8.2 0.0 4.3 5.9 6.1 17.6 22.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 347 494 218 258 403 284 1572 832 602 2829 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.57 0.80 0.26 0.63 0.45 0.18 0.19 0.87 0.53 I Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 504 874 385 302 666 302 1572 832 821 2829 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.( 0 0
Upstream Filter(I) 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.9 42.9 44.5 52.4 50.8 0.0 52.5 19.0 19.0 48.2 16.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.5 0.9 6.1 0.5 1.6 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.5 7.4 0.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.1 3.5 4.7 1.0 3.6 0.0 1.8 2.3 2.5 7.9 8.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 55.4 43.8 50.6 52.9 52.4 0.0 53.6 19.2 19.5 55.6 17.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D D D D D B B E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 740 322 571 2026
Approach Delay, s/veh 49.9 52.5 27.1 27.4
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.4 59.9 13.5 21.2 14.4 71.0 16.5 18.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 33.5 10.5 29.5 10.5 51.5 17.5 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.6 8.1 4.2 14.6 6.3 24.3 11.6 10.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.3 2.4 0.1 1.9 0.1 11.6 0.5 1.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 34.1
HCM 7th LOS C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-10
12-458

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour
1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
--s t 4' 4 -
Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 848 26 37 922 15 63
Future Volume (vph) 1 848 26 37 922 15 63
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 145 0 150 0 55
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
1 ftet) I ttst rr
449 1296 688

5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 22.5

14.5 23.0 14.5 23.0 22.5 22.5

24.2% 38.3% 24.2% 38.3% 37.5% 37.5%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-11
12-459

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
f
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
1 Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 848 26 37 922 15 63
Future Volume (veh/h) 1 848 26 37 922 15 63
Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 922 28 40 1002 16 68
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
idt14 I ttst r
0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 2005 61 144 2808 534 476
Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.16 1.00 0.30 0.30
2 2 2 2 2 2
Sat Flow, veh/h 5259 154 1781 5274 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 616 334 40 1002 16 68
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1841 1781 1702 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 8.1 1.2 0.0 0.4 1.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.0 8.1 1.2 0.0 0.4 1.9
Prop In Lane 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1341 725 144 2808 534 476
V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.46 0.28 0.36 0.03 0.14
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1341 725 297 2808 534 476
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.5 13.5 23.6 0.0 14.8 15.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 2.1 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.6
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.7 3.1 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.7
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 14.6 15.6 24.5 0.3 14.9 16.0
LnGrp LOS B B C A BB
Approach Vol, veh/h 950 1042 84
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.9 1.3 15.8
Approach LOS B A B
T
•
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.4 28.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 18.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 10.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 5.9 0.2
1 2
6 8

37.5 22.5

18.5 18.0

2.0 3.9
ntersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 8.1
HCM 7th LOS A
Notes
User approved ignoring U -Turning movement.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-12
12-460

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.
k
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Taper Length (ft)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 4 4 4 r 4
74 0 8 0 0 0 3 19 0 0 15 24
74 0 8 0 0 0 3 19 0 0 15 24
90 90 90 90
30 30 30 30
743 190 435 688

16.9 4.3 9.9 15.4
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
A
rea Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_1560016000115800\15868\02LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-13
12-461

HCM 7th TWSC Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.6
Movement

EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 74 0 8 0 0 0 3 19 0 0 15 24
Future Vol, veh/h 74 0 8 0 0 0 3 19 0 0 15 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized
4+ 4+ 4 r 4+
1 - None
- None
- None
- None
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0
Grade, %
Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76
- 50
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 97 0 11 0 0 0 4 25 0 0 20 32
Major/Minor Minor2
Conflicting Flow All
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
78 78 46 63 94 35 56 0 0 30 0 0
Stage 1 41 41 - 38 38
Stage 2 38 38 - 25 56
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 910 812 1024 932 796 1038 1548
- 4.12
- 6.12 5.52
- 2.218
- 1583
Stage 1 974 861
Stage 2 977 863 - 993 848
- 977 863
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 899 802 1014 911 786 1028 1541
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 899 802
- 1575
- 911 786
Stage 1 970 857 - 970 857
Stage 2 970 857 - 978 844
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.49

HCM LOS
EB
WB
NB
SB
0 1
0 A
A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
245 - - 909 - 1575 -

0.003
- 0.119
HCM Control Delay (slveh) 7.3 0 - 9.5 0 0
HCM Lane LOS

A A - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0 - 0.4
0 Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-14
12-462

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour
3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt'jr, ' t41 rf '1 t ►j t+
Traffic Volume (vph) 67 788 72 45 762 8 74 3 58 18 6 134 Future Volume (vph) 67 788 72 45 762 8 74 3 58 18 6 134 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 155 0 150 85 180 180 135 0
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 120 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1296 597 233 614

19.6 9.0 5.3 14.0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6
3 8
7 4
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 17.0 49.0 19.0 51.0 51.0 22.0 35.0 17.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 14.2% 40.8% 15.8% 42.5% 42.5% 18.3% 29.2% 14.2% 25.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
None C -Max None C -Max C -Max None Max None Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr. ♦ 01
05 1111
02 (R) ! 03 04
07 T08
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-15
12-463

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations rj +4'4 ' 14 if 'I I "i t+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 67 788 72 45 762 8 74 3 58 18 6 134 Future Volume (veh/h) 67 788 72 45 762 8 74 3 58 18 6 134 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
74 876 80 50 847 9 82 3 64 20 7 149
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 264 2322 211 120 2446 757 139 18 385 72 15 328 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.14 0.96 0.96 0.08 0.25 0.25 0.04 0.22 0.22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4761 433 1781 5106 1580 1781 71 1516 1781 71 1514 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 74 625 331 50 847 9 82 0 67 20 0 156 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1790 1781 1702 1580 1781 0 1587 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 13.8 13.9 3.1 1.2 0.0 5.3 0.0 3.9 1.3 0.0 10.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 13.8 13.9 3.1 1.2 0.0 5.3 0.0 3.9 1.3 0.0 10.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 264 1660 873 120 2446 757 139 0 403 72 0 344 V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.38 0.38 0.42 0.35 0.01 0.59 0.00 0.17 0.28 0.00 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 360 1660 873 215 2446 757 260 0 403 186 0 344 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.3 19.3 19.3 49.7 1.3 1.3 53.5 0.0 34.8 55.9 0.0 40.i Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.8 0.3 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.9 2.0 0.0 4.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.0 5.3 5.8 1.4 0.4 0.0 2.5 0.0 1.6 0.6 0.0 4.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 52.8 19.9 20.5 51.6 1.7 1.3 57.4 0.0 35.7 57.9 0.0 45.1 LnGrp LOS D B C D A A E D E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1030 906 149 176
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.4 4.4 47.7 46.6
Approach LOS C A D D
0 Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.6 63.0 13.8 30.5 13.7 62.0 9.4 35.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.5 44.5 17.5 25.5 12.5 46.5 12.5 30.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 15.9 7.3 12.3 4.4 3.2 3.3 5.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.4 0.1 0.7 0.1 6.3 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.8
HCM 7th LOS B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-16
12-464

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour
4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.
-PP C 4-
t
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations i tti4 ) 1ft rf '1 i ►j 1)+
Traffic Volume (vph) 142 659 63 93 604 188 77 32 104 484 34 134 Future Volume (vph) 142 659 63 93 604 188 77 32 104 484 34 134 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 125 0 160 115 145 145 110 110
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 597 738 224 460

9.0 11.2 5.1 10.5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 14.6 30.5 16.0 31.9 31.9 16.8 22.5 51.0 56.7 Total Split (%) 12.2% 25.4% 13.3% 26.6% 26.6% 14.0% 18.8% 42.5% 47.3% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C -Max

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
None C -Max C -Max None Max None Max
Intersection Summary
A
rea Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-17
12-465

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +0 ' 141 rf 'I I '9 11+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 142 659 63 93 604 188 77 32 104 484 34 134 Future Volume (veh/h) 142 659 63 93 604 188 77 32 104 484 34 134 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 154 716 68 101 657 204 84 35 113 526 37 146 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 286 1216 115 143 1296 400 139 77 247 561 773 687 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.08 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.31 0.44 0.44 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4743 447 1781 5106 1576 1781 387 1248 1781 1777 1580 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 154 512 272 101 657 204 84 0 148 526 37 146 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1787 1781 1702 1576 1781 0 1635 1781 1777 1580 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 15.8 16.0 6.6 13.2 13.3 5.5 0.0 9.6 34.4 1.4 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 15.8 16.0 6.6 13.2 13.3 5.5 0.0 9.6 34.4 1.4 6.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 286 872 458 143 1296 400 139 0 324 561 773 687 V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.59 0.59 0.70 0.51 0.51 0.60 0.00 0.46 0.94 0.05 0.21 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 291 872 458 171 1296 400 183 0 324 690 773 687 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.8 39.1 39.1 53.8 38.3 38.4 53.5 0.0 42.4 40.0 19.6 21.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.7 2.6 5.0 8.9 1.2 4.0 4.1 0.0 4.6 18.3 0.1 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.2 6.7 7.4 3.3 5.5 5.6 2.6 0.0 4.3 17.8 0.6 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 54.5 41.7 44.2 62.7 39.6 42.4 57.6 0.0 47.0 58.3 19.7 21.8 LnGrp LOS
Approach Vol, veh/h 938 962 232 709
Approach Delay, s/veh 44.5 42.6 50.8 48.7
Approach LOS D D D D
0 D D D E D D E D E BC
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.2 35.3 13.9 56.7 14.4 35.0 42.3 28.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.5 26.0 12.3 52.2 10.1 27.4 46.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 18.0 7.5 8.9 7.1 15.3 36.4 11.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.9 0.1 1.2 0.1 3.8 1.3 0.4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ntersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 45.4
HCM 7th LOS D
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-18
12-466

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour
5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
-- -Nir #` 4-
t
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' tt tt + ►j , .

Traffic Volume (vph) 574 400 306 60 372 632 364 1021 35 398 817 392 Future Volume (vph) 574 400 306 60 372 632 364 1021 35 398 817 392 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 0 155 175 255 0 175 190
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 120 120
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 50 50
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 738 479 794 571

11.2 7.3 10.8 7.8
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Free
7 4
3 8
5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 Free
Detector Phase
7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode

10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5

26.2 51.7 51.7 14.5 40.0 40.0 20.8 33.6 20.2 33.0

21.8% 43.1% 43.1% 12.1% 33.3% 33.3% 17.3% 28.0% 16.8% 27.5%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
None None None None None None None C -Max
None C -Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 50.8 (42%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
•
Splits and Phases:
5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
•

3.2-19
12-467

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing (2024) PM Peak Hour 5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
--► �`t 4-
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' tt r r + vi'i t1' r
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 574 400 306 60 372 632 364 1021 35 398 817 392 Future Volume (veh/h) 574 400 306 60 372 632 364 1021 35 398 817 392 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 586 408 312 61 380 0 371 1042 36 406 834 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green 0.30 0.41 0.41 0.07 0.14 0.00 0.12 0.40 0.40 0.13 0.41 0.00 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
625 881 391 250 496 428 2021 70 452 2071
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1575 3456 3554 1585 3456 5067 175 3456 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 586 408 312 61 380 0 371 700 378 406 834 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1777 1575 1728 1777 1585 1728 1702 1838 1728 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 19.8 10.0 20.8 2.0 12.4 0.0 12.6 18.7 18.7 13.9 13.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 19.8 10.0 20.8 2.0 12.4 0.0 12.6 18.7 18.7 13.9 13.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 625 881 391 250 496 428 1358 733 452 2071 V/C Ratio(X) 0.94 0.46 0.80 0.24 0.77 0.87 0.52 0.52 0.90 0.40 I Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 625 1398 620 288 1051 469 1358 733 452 2071 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.54 0.54 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.2 29.4 32.5 52.6 49.7 0.0 51.6 27.3 27.3 51.4 25.3 0.

Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.1 0.2 2.1 0.5 2.5 0.0 14.6 1.4 2.6 20.4 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 8.3 3.8 6.6 0.9 5.5 0.0 6.2 7.4 8.3 7.1 5.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 55.3 29.6 34.7 53.1 52.3 0.0 66.2 28.7 29.9 71.7 25.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS
Approach Vol, veh/h 1306 441 1449 1240
Approach Delay, s/veh 42.3 52.4 38.6 40.9
Approach LOS D D D D
0 0

E CC D D E CC EC
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.2 52.4 13.2 34.3 19.4 53.2 26.2 21.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.7 29.1 10.0 47.2 16.3 28.5 21.7 35.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 15.9 20.7 4.0 22.8 14.6 15.9 21.8 14.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.9 0.1 3.6 0.2 4.1 0.0 2.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 41.7
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro101 - Existing.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

3.2-20
12-468

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
APPENDIX 3.3: TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-469

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-470

California MUTCD 2016 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Traffic Conditions = EXISTING (2024) PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Via Vail
Minor Street Name = Key Largo Av.

Minor Street - Higher -Volume Approach (VPH)
Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 82
Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street = 1
High Volume Approach (VPH) = 39
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street = 1

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0 400
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
—0— 1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
—a— 2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) - 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
xi...—. Minor Street Approaches
*Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor -street approach with one lane Intersection ID: #2
F:IUXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102 LOSISignal Warrants101 - Existing102U_PM.xlslFig 4C-3 (Urban Peak)

3.3-1
12-471

California MUTCD 2016 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Traffic Conditions = EXISTING (2024) AM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Key Largo Av. Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 141 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Via Vail
Minor Street - Higher -Volume Approach (VPH)
High Volume Approach (VPH) = 24
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street = 1

3.3-2
12-472

California MUTCD 2016 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Traffic Conditions = E+A+P (2026) AM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Key Largo Av. Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 171 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Via Vail
Minor Street - Higher -Volume Approach (VPH)
High Volume Approach (VPH) = 62
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street = 1

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0 400
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
—0— 1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
—a— 2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) - 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
xi...—. Minor Street Approaches
*Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor -street approach with one lane Intersection ID: #2
F:IUXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOSISignal Warrants102 - EAP)02U_AM.xls\Fig 4C-3 (Urban Peak)

3.3-3
12-473

California MUTCD 2016 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Traffic Conditions = E+A+P (2026) PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Via Vail
Minor Street Name = Key Largo Av.

Minor Street - Higher -Volume Approach (VPH)
Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 134
Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street = 1
High Volume Approach (VPH) = 102
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street = 1

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0 400
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
—0— 1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
—a— 2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) - 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
xi...—. Minor Street Approaches
*Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor -street approach with one lane Intersection ID: #2
F:IUXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOSISignal Warrants102 - EAP102U_PM.xls\Fig 4C-3 (Urban Peak)

3.3-4
12-474

California MUTCD 2016 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Traffic Conditions = EAPC (2026) AM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS
Major Street Name = Via Vail
Minor Street Name = Key Largo Av.

Minor Street - Higher -Volume Approach (VPH)
Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 229
Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street = 1
High Volume Approach (VPH) = 197
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street = 1

3.3-5
12-475

California MUTCD 2016 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Traffic Conditions = EAPC (2026) PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS
Major Street Name = Key Largo Av. Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 267 Number of Approach Lanes on Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Via Vail
Minor Street - Higher -Volume Approach (VPH)
High Volume Approach (VPH) = 124
Number of Approach Lanes On Minor Street = 1

3.3-6
12-476

California MUTCD (FHWA's MUTCD 2014, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
(Average Traffic Estimate Form)
TRAFFIC CONDITIONS EAP 2026

DIST CO RTE
Jurisdiction: City of Rancho Mirage
Major Street: Key Largo Av.

Minor Street: Via Vail
PM
Major Street Approach Lanes =
Major Street Future ADT =
CALC JC DATE 05/20/24
1 lane
1,706 vpd

CHK DATE
Critical Approach Speed (Major) 35 mph
Critical Approach Speed (Minor) 35 mph
Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic > 64 km/h (40 mph); In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 population (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note)
Minor Street Approach Lane: 1 lane
Minor Street Future ADT = 728 vpd
or URBAN (U)

URBAN RURAL
Minimum Requirements
ADT
XX
CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume
Satisfied Not Satisfied
Vehicles Per Day on
Major Street
(Total of Both Approaches)
Vehicles Per Day
on Higher -Volume
Minor Street Approach
(One Direction Only)
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street
Urban Rural
Urban Rural
1 1,706 / 728
2 + /
2 + 2 +
/ 2 +
8,000 5,600
9,600 6,720
9,600 6,720
8,000 5,600
2,400 1,680
2,400 1,680
3,200 2,240
3,200 2,240
CONDITION B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Satisfied Not Satisfied
Vehicles Per Day
on Major Street
(Total of Both Approaches)
Vehicles Per Day
on Higher -Volume
Minor Street Approach
(One Direction Only)
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street
Urban Rural
Urban Rural
/ 1,706 / 728
2 + /
2 + 2 +
/ 2 +
12,000 8,400
14,400 10,080
14,400 10,080
12,000 8,400
1,200 850
1,200 850
1,600 1,120
1,600 1,120
Combination of CONDITIONS A + B
Satisfied Not Satisfied
2 CONDITIONS
80%
2 CONDITIONS
80%
XX
No one condition satisfied, but following conditions
fulfilled 80% of more A B
21% 14%
Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes.

The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

F:\UXRjobs\_15600_16000\_15800\15868\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\15868-Daily.xlsx\EAP_02

3.3-7
12-477

California MUTCD (FHWA's MUTCD 2014, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
(Average Traffic Estimate Form)
TRAFFIC CONDITIONS EAP 2026

DIST CO RTE
Jurisdiction: City of Rancho Mirage
Major Street: Via Vail
Minor Street: Project Entry
PM
Major Street Approach Lanes =
Major Street Future ADT =
CALC JC DATE 05/20/24
1 lane
568 vpd

URBAN RURAL
Minimum Requirements
ADT
XX
CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume
Satisfied Not Satisfied
Vehicles Per Day on
Major Street
(Total of Both Approaches)
Vehicles Per Day
on Higher -Volume
Minor Street Approach
(One Direction Only)
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street
Urban Rural
Urban Rural
1 568 / 568
2 + /
2 + 2 +
/ 2 +
8,000 5,600
9,600 6,720
9,600 6,720
8,000 5,600
2,400 1,680
2,400 1,680
3,200 2,240
3,200 2,240
CONDITION B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Satisfied Not Satisfied
Vehicles Per Day
on Major Street
(Total of Both Approaches)
Vehicles Per Day
on Higher -Volume
Minor Street Approach
(One Direction Only)
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street
Urban Rural
Urban Rural
/ 568 / 568
2 + /
2 + 2 +
/ 2 +
12,000 8,400
14,400 10,080
14,400 10,080
12,000 8,400
1,200 850
1,200 850
1,600 1,120
1,600 1,120
Combination of CONDITIONS A + B
Satisfied Not Satisfied
2 CONDITIONS
80%
2 CONDITIONS
80%
XX
No one condition satisfied, but following conditions
fulfilled 80% of more A B
7% 5%
Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes.

The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

F:\UXRjobs\_15600_16000\_15800\15868\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\15868-Daily.xlsx\EAP_06

3.3-8
12-478

California MUTCD (FHWA's MUTCD 2014, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
(Average Traffic Estimate Form)
TRAFFIC CONDITIONS EAPC 2026

DIST CO RTE
Jurisdiction: City of Rancho Mirage
Major Street: Key Largo Av.

Minor Street: Via Vail
PM
Major Street Approach Lanes =
Major Street Future ADT =
CALC JC DATE 05/20/24
1 lane
2,938 vpd

URBAN RURAL
Minimum Requirements
ADT
XX
CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume
Satisfied Not Satisfied
Vehicles Per Day on
Major Street
(Total of Both Approaches)
Vehicles Per Day
on Higher -Volume
Minor Street Approach
(One Direction Only)
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street
Urban Rural
Urban Rural
1 2,938 / 1,555
2 + /
2 + 2 +
/ 2 +
8,000 5,600
9,600 6,720
9,600 6,720
8,000 5,600
2,400 1,680
2,400 1,680
3,200 2,240
3,200 2,240
CONDITION B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Satisfied Not Satisfied
Vehicles Per Day
on Major Street
(Total of Both Approaches)
Vehicles Per Day
on Higher -Volume
Minor Street Approach
(One Direction Only)
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street
Urban Rural
Urban Rural
/ 2,938 / 1,555
2 + /
2 + 2 +
/ 2 +
12,000 8,400
14,400 10,080
14,400 10,080
12,000 8,400
1,200 * 850
1,200 850
1,600 1,120
1,600 1,120
Combination of CONDITIONS A + B
Satisfied Not Satisfied
2 CONDITIONS
80%
2 CONDITIONS
80%
XX
No one condition satisfied, but following conditions
fulfilled 80% of more A B
37% 24%
Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes.

The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

F:\UXRjobs\_15600_16000\_15800\15868\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\15868-Daily.xlsx\EAPC_02

3.3-9
12-479

California MUTCD (FHWA's MUTCD 2014, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
(Average Traffic Estimate Form)
TRAFFIC CONDITIONS EAPC 2025

DIST CO RTE
Jurisdiction: City of Rancho Mirage
Major Street: Via Vail
Minor Street: Project Entry
PM
Major Street Approach Lanes =
Major Street Future ADT =
CALC JC DATE 05/20/24
1 lane
2,542 vpd

URBAN RURAL
Minimum Requirements
ADT
XX
CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume
Satisfied Not Satisfied
Vehicles Per Day on
Major Street
(Total of Both Approaches)
Vehicles Per Day
on Higher -Volume
Minor Street Approach
(One Direction Only)
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street
Urban Rural
Urban Rural
1 2,542 / 568
2 + /
2 + 2 +
/ 2 +
8,000 5,600
9,600 6,720
9,600 6,720
8,000 5,600
2,400 1,680
2,400 1,680
3,200 2,240
3,200 2,240
CONDITION B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Satisfied Not Satisfied
Vehicles Per Day
on Major Street
(Total of Both Approaches)
Vehicles Per Day
on Higher -Volume
Minor Street Approach
(One Direction Only)
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Major Street Minor Street
Urban Rural
Urban Rural
/ 2,542 / 568
2 + /
2 + 2 +
/ 2 +
12,000 8,400
14,400 10,080
14,400 10,080
12,000 8,400
1,200 850
1,200 850
1,600 1,120
1,600 1,120
Combination of CONDITIONS A + B
Satisfied Not Satisfied
2 CONDITIONS
80%
2 CONDITIONS
80%
XX
No one condition satisfied, but following conditions
fulfilled 80% of more A B
24% 21%
Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes.

The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

F:\UXRjobs\_15600_16000\_15800\15868\02_LOS\Signal Warrants \15868-Daily.xlsx\EAPC_04

3.3-10
12-480

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
APPENDIX 5.1: EAP (2026) INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS

WORKSHEETS
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-481

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-482

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour
1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
► _, p C 4 -
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 145 0 150 0 0 55 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 45
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 If fft I fff
1 728 38 106 512 0 22 0 74 0 0 0
1 728 38 106 512 0 22 0 74 0 0 0
449 1296 688 102

6.8 19.6 15.6 1.5
5 5 5 5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Prot NA Prot NA Prot Perm
5 2 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 8
Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 3 8
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 22.5

14.5 23.0 14.5 23.0 22.5 22.5

24.2% 38.3% 24.2% 38.3% 37.5% 37.5%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead Lag Lead Lag
Yes Yes
None C -Max
Yes Yes
None C -Max
Max Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 60
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases:
1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-1
12-483

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour 1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
4-
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'j ++1+ ' tit ' tr
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 728 38 106 512 0 22 0 74
Future Volume (veh/h) 1 728 38 106 512 0 22 0 74
Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.00 0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
1 774 40 113 545 0 23 0 79
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.14 0.47 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 2
3 1658 85 252 2418 0 534 0 476
Sat Flow, veh/h
1781 4970 256 1781 5274 0 1781 0 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1 529 285 113 545 0 23 0 79
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1702 1822 1781 1702 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 7.4 7.4 3.5 3.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 7.4 7.4 3.5 3.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.2 Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1136 608 252 2418 0 534 0 476
V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.47 0.47 0.45 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.17 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 297 1136 608 297 2418 0 534 0 476 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 0.14 1.00

0.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.9 15.8 15.8 23.6 9.3 0.0 14.9 0.0 15.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 56.0 1.4 2.6 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.1 2.6 3.0 1.4 1.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 85.9 17.1 18.4 24.8 9.5 0.0 15.0 0.0 16.2 LnGrp LOS F B B C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 815 658 102
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.7 12.1 16.0
Approach LOS B B B
7 Il
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 24.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 18.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.5 9.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 15.2
HCM 7th LOS B
1 2 5 6 8

4.6 32.9 22.5

4.5 4.5 4.5

10.0 18.5 18.0

2.0 5.8 4.2

0.0 2.7 0.2
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-2
12-484

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.
- —► 't
4\
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 50 0 50
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 1 4 r 4 r
21 1 4 1 3 58 6 17 1 23 27 97
21 1 4 1 3 58 6 17 1 23 27 97
90 90 90 90
30 30 30 30
743 784 435 688

16.9 4.3 9.9 15.4
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Stop Free Free
ntersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-3
12-485

HCM 7th TWSC EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 1 4 1 3 58 6 17 1 23 27 97
Future Vol, veh/h 21 1 4 1 3 58 6 17 1 23 27 97
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized
t+ 4 r 4 !
- None - None - None - None
-111
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 - 0
Grade, %
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
- 50 - 50
0 - - 0 - - 0 0
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 23 1 4 1 3 63 7 18 1 25 29 105
Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All 123 122 39 121 226 28 140 0 0 25 0 0 Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Stage 1 84 84 - 37 37
Stage 2 38 38 - 85 190
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 852 768 1032 854 673 1047 1444 - 1590 Stage 1 924 825 - 979 865
Stage 2 977 864 - 923 743
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 772 745 1022 822 652 1037 1437 - 1582 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 772 745 - 822 652
Stage 1 903 807 - 970 856
Stage 2 906 856 - 898 727
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.66

HCM LOS
EB
WB
NB
SB

8.83 1.88

1.14 A
A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
470 - - 801 1007 828 -

0.005
- 0.035 0.066 0.016
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 0 - 9.7 8.8 7.3 0
HCM Lane LOS

A A - A A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0
- 0.1 0.2 0
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

Synchro 12 Report

5.1-4
12-486

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour
3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 155 0 150 85 180 180 135 0
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 120 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 fter4 I 1it1 'i T.+ 'i t+
42 684 37 15 645 11 19 1 11 5 3 17
42 684 37 15 645 11 19 1 11 5 3 17
1296 597 233 614

19.6 9.0 5.3 14.0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases
6 Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 19.0 53.0 20.0 54.0 54.0 21.0 29.0 18.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 15.8% 44.2% 16.7% 45.0% 45.0% 17.5% 24.2% 15.0% 21.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lead Lag
Yes Yes
None C -Max
Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
None C -Max C -Max None Max
Lead Lag
Yes Yes
None Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases:
3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-5
12-487

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour 3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations VI 4114 'I idlut ii. "i t+ 11 T,
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 42 684 37 15 645 11 19 1 11 5 3 17 Future Volume (veh/h) 42 684 37 15 645 11 19 1 11 5 3 17 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 698 38 15 658 11 19 1 11 5 3 17
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 219 2968 161 58 2902 898 70 27 300 23 43 245
Arrive On Green 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.97 0.97 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.18 0.18 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4956 269 1781 5106 1581 1781 133 1462 1781 242 1369 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 478 258 15 658 11 19 0 12 5 0 20 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1821 1781 1702 1581 1781 0 1595 1781 0 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 219 2039 1090 58 2902 898 70 0 328 23 0 289 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.23 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.00 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 418 2039 1090 230 2902 898 245 0 328 200 0 289 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.7 0.0 0.0 55.3 0.9 0.9 56.0 0.0 38.2 58.6 0.0 40.

Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.2 0.5 2.2 0.2 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.2 4.7 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.1 0.2 0.5 57.4 1.1 0.9 58.1 0.0 38.4 63.4 0.0 41.4 LnGrp LOS D A A E A A E D E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 779 684 31 25
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.1 2.3 50.5 45.8
Approach LOS A A D D

1.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.0 1.2
9 0
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.4 76.4 9.2 26.0 12.1 72.7 6.0 29.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 48.5 16.5 21.5 14.5 49.5 13.5 24.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 2.0 3.2 3.2 3.4 2.7 2.3 2.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 4.4
HCM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
7th LOS A
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-6
12-488

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour
4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.
-PP C 4 -
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' ii 4 'l, ' 141 rf 'I I '1 1
Traffic Volume (vph) 73 570 57 49 562 122 68 9 46 154 5 41 Future Volume (vph) 73 570 57 49 562 122 68 9 46 154 5 41 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 125 0 160 115 145 145 110 110
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 597 738 224 460

9.0 11.2 5.1 10.5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 18.0 40.0 20.0 42.0 42.0 21.0 26.0 34.0 39.0 Total Split (%) 15.0% 33.3% 16.7% 35.0% 35.0% 17.5% 21.7% 28.3% 32.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
None C -Max None C -Max C -Max None Max None Max
ntersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases:
4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-7
12-489

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour 4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ‘Iii ++t+ 'I t41 ic 'I I ►i +t+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 73 570 57 49 562 122 68 9 46 154 5 41 Future Volume (veh/h) 73 570 57 49 562 122 68 9 46 154 5 41 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj.

Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No No No No
77 600 60 52 592 128 72 9 48 162 5 43
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 266 1974 195 122 2092 647 135 65 347 193 511 453 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.75 0.75 0.07 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.25 0.25 0.11 0.29 0.29 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4721 467 1781 5106 1579 1781 255 1361 1781 1777 1577 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 77 431 229 52 592 128 72 0 57 162 5 43 Grp Sat riow(s),ven/h/In 11 a 1 /UL 1 /tf4 1 /tf1 1 /UL 1bN 1/t31 U 1 b1b 1/b1 1 / / / 1b// Q
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 4.9 5.0 3.4 9.3 6.2 4.7 0.0 3.3 10.7 0.2 2.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 266 1423 746 122 2092 647 135 0 412 193 511 453 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.43 0.28 0.20 0.53 0.00 0.14 0.84 0.01 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 389 1423 746 230 2092 647 245 0 412 438 511 453 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.7 9.2 9.3 53.6 23.6 22.7 53.4 0.0 34.5 52.5 30.5 31.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.5 1.0 2.1 0.3 0.6 3.2 0.0 0.7 9.2 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.0 1.6 1.8 1.5 3.7 2.4 2.2 0.0 1.4 5.3 0.1 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 49.3 9.8 10.3 55.7 24.0 23.4 56.7 0.0 35.2 61.7 30.6 31.7 LnGrp LOS
Approach Vol, veh/h 737 772 129 210
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.1 26.0 47.2 54.8
Approach LOS B C D D
Serve(g_s), s 2.4 4.9 5.0 3.4 9.3 6.2 4.7 0.0 3.3 10.7 0.2 2.4 0 D A B E C C E D E C C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.7 54.7 13.6 39.0 13.7 53.7 17.5 35.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 35.5 16.5 34.5 13.5 37.5 29.5 21.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.4 7.0 6.7 4.4 4.4 11.3 12.7 5.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 4.3 0.4 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 26.0
HCM 7th LOS C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-8
12-490

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour
5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
__ C 4 -
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 304 278 183 67 250 295 131 401 31 511 1471 47 Future Volume (vph) 304 278 183 67 250 295 131 401 31 511 1471 478 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 0 155 175 255 0 175 190
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 120 120
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 50 50
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 r r + ttt r
8 738 479 794 571

11.2 7.3 10.8 7.8
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Free
7 4
3 8
5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 Free
Detector Phase
7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Max None C -Max

10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5

23.0 36.2 36.2 14.8 28.0 28.0 15.0 36.7 32.3 54.0

19.2% 30.2% 30.2% 12.3% 23.3% 23.3% 12.5% 30.6% 26.9% 45.0%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
ntersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 84.3 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
•
•
T02 (R)
06 (R)
It03
J 07
'4` 04
08 1
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-9
12-491

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour 5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 304 278 183 67 250 295 131 401 31 511 1471 47 Future Volume (veh/h) 304 278 183 67 250 295 131 401 31 511 1471 478 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 323 296 195 71 266 0 139 427 33 544 1565 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1).1 r r + +111 r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.12 0.00 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.18 0.54 0.00 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
393 556 246 261 420 285 2118 162 622 2734
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1570 3456 3554 1585 3456 4837 369 3456 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 323 296 195 71 266 0 139 299 161 544 1565 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1777 1570 1728 1777 1585 1728 1702 1802 1728 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.1 9.7 14.7 2.3 8.6 0.0 4.6 6.5 6.6 18.4 24.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.1 9.7 14.7 2.3 8.6 0.0 4.6 6.5 6.6 18.4 24.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 393 556 246 261 420 285 1491 789 622 2734 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.53 0.79 0.27 0.63 0.49 0.20 0.20 0.87 0.57 I Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 533 939 415 297 696 302 1491 789 801 2734 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 56.5 52.6 55.0 52.4 50.4 0.0 52.6 20.8 20.8 47.9 18.7 0.

Incr Delay (d2), s/veh
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh
%ile Back0fQ(50%),veh/In
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 63.3 53.3 60.2 52.9 52.0 0.0 53.9 21.1 21.4 56.6 19.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D E D D D C C E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 814 337 599 2109
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.9 52.2 28.8 29.1
Approach LOS E D C C
0 6.7

0.0 5.4

0.7 0.0

4.6 5.2

0.0 6.5

0.6 0.0

1.0 1.6

0.0 3.8

0.0 0.0

0.0 1.3

0.0 2.0

0.3 0.0

2.5 0.6

0.0 2.8

8.7 0.0

8.4 0.9

0.0 9.0
0 0.0

0.0 0.0
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.1 57.0 13.6 23.3 14.4 68.7 18.2 18.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.8 32.2 10.3 31.7 10.5 49.5 18.5 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 20.4 8.6 4.3 16.7 6.6 26.6 13.1 10.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 2.5 0.1 2.0 0.1 11.2 0.5 1.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 37.4
HCM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
7th LOS D
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-10
12-492

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour
6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
1 4 T
61 1 1 1 1 24
61 1 1 1 1 24
30 30 30
246 314 900

4.2 7.1 20.4
5 5 5 5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:

Control
Other
Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-11
12-493

HCM 7th TWSC EAP (2026) AM Peak Hour
6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations '
Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 1 1 1 1 24
Future Vol, veh/h 61 1 1 1 1 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 5 0 0 5
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized
4 '4
- None - None - None
Storage Length 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0
Grade, %
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
0 0 0
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 66 1 1 1 1 26
Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All 27 24 32 0 - 0
Minor2 Major1 Major2
Stage 1 19
Stage 2 8
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 988 1052 1580
Stage 1 1004
Stage 2 1015
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 978 1042 1572
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 978
Stage 1 998
Stage 2 1010
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s/v 8.95 3.65

HCM LOS

EB NB SB
0 A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio

0.001
- 0.069
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 0 9
HCM Lane LOS
A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

Synchro 12 Report

5.1-12
12-494

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour
1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
► _, p C 4 -
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 145 0 150 0 0 55 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 45
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1 882 41 85 959 0 26 0 99 0 0
0 1 882 41 85 959 0 26 0 99 0 0 0
449 1296 688 102

5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 22.5

14.5 23.0 14.5 23.0 22.5 22.5

24.2% 38.3% 24.2% 38.3% 37.5% 37.5%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead Lag Lead Lag
Yes Yes
None C -Max
Yes Yes
None C -Max
Max Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 60
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-13
12-495

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour 1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
-11"" 4-
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h)
Future Volume (veh/h)
Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 0 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1 882 41 85 959 0 26 0 99
1 882 41 85 959 0 26 0 99
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.00 0.99 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
1 959 45 92 1042 0 28 0 108
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.26 0.95 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 2
3 1720 81 233 2418 0 534 0 476
Sat Flow, veh/h
1781 4996 234 1781 5274 0 1781 0 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1 653 351 92 1042 0 28 0 108
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1702 1826 1781 1702 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 9.3 9.4 2.6 1.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 3.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 9.3 9.4 2.6 1.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 3.1 Prop In Lane
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1172 629 233 2418 0 534 0 476
V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.56 0.56 0.40 0.43 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 297 1172 629 297 2418 0 534 0 476 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 0.13 1.00

0.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.9 16.0 16.0 20.2 0.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 15.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 56.0 1.9 3.6 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.1 3.3 3.8 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 85.9 17.9 19.5 21.2 1.4 0.0 15.1 0.0 16.9 LnGrp LOS F B B C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1005 1134 136
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.5 3.0 16.5
Approach LOS B A B
1 Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.3 25.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 18.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.6 11.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.7
HCM 7th LOS B
1 2
5 6
8 1

4.6 32.9 22.5

4.5 4.5 4.5

10.0 18.5 18.0

2.0 3.1 5.1

0.0 6.0 0.3
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-14
12-496

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.
4\
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 50 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Taper Length (ft)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 4 4 4 r
77 3 8 1 2 43 3 20 1 61 16 25
77 3 8 1 2 43 3 20 1 61 16 25
90 90 90 90
30 30 30 30
743 786 435 688

16.9 4.3 9.9 15.4
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-15
12-497

HCM 7th TWSC EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.4
Movement

EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
4+ 4+ r 4+
77 3 8 1 2 43 3 20 1 61 16 25
77 3 8 1 2 43 3 20 1 61 16 25
5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5
Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free - None
- None
- None
- None
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0
Grade, %
Peak Hour Factor
- 50
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76
Heavy Vehicles,
Mvmt Flow 101
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
4 11 1 3 57 4 26 1 80 21 33
Major/Minor Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 244 244 48 228 259 36 59
Minor1
Major1
Major2
0 0 33 0 0
Stage 1 203 203 - 39 39
Stage 2
41 41 - 189 219
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 710 658 1022 727 646 1036 1545
- 4.12
- 6.12 5.52
- 2.218
- 1579
Stage 1 799 733
Stage 2 974 861 - 813 722
- 976 862
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 625 616 1012 670 604 1026 1538
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 625 616
- 1572
- 670 604
Stage 1 753 691 - 969 856
Stage 2 911 855 - 754 680
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s/v11.77

HCM LOS
EB
WB
NB
SB

8.89 0.92

4.43 B
A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
235 - - 648 985 959 -

0.003
- 0.179 0.061 0.051
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 0 - 11.8 8.9 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS

A A - B A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0 - 0.6 0.2 0.2
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-16
12-498

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour
3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations i ++1 ' t4 rf 'I I ►i T,
Traffic Volume (vph) 70 853 76 47 838 8 78 3 60 19 6 140 Future Volume (vph) 70 853 76 47 838 8 78 3 60 19 6 140 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 155 0 150 85 180 180 135 0
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 120 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1296 597 233 614

19.6 9.0 5.3 14.0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6
3 8
7 4
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 17.0 51.0 18.0 52.0 52.0 22.0 34.0 17.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 14.2% 42.5% 15.0% 43.3% 43.3% 18.3% 28.3% 14.2% 24.2% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C -Max

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
None C -Max C -Max None Max None Max
Intersection Summary
A
rea Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases:
3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-17
12-499

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour 3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations i t 'r, ' t41 if '1 't ►j t+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 70 853 76 47 838 8 78 3 60 19 6 140 Future Volume (veh/h) 70 853 76 47 838 8 78 3 60 19 6 140 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj.

Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No No No No
78 948 84 52 931 9 87 3 67 21 7 156
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 267 2356 208 122 2477 766 140 17 373 75 14 317 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.33 0.33 0.14 0.97 0.97 0.08 0.25 0.25 0.04 0.21 0.21 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4774 422 1781 5106 1580 1781 68 1518 1781 68 1516 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 78 675 357 52 931 9 87 0 70 21 0 163 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1792 1781 1702 1580 1781 0 1586 1781 0 1584 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 18.4 18.5 3.2 1.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 4.2 1.4 0.0 10.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 18.4 18.5 3.2 1.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 4.2 1.4 0.0 10.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 267 1680 884 122 2477 766 140 0 390 75 0 331 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.40 0.40 0.43 0.38 0.01 0.62 0.00 0.18 0.28 0.00 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 360 1680 884 200 2477 766 260 0 390 186 0 331 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.7 26.5 26.5 49.6 0.9 0.9 53.5 0.0 35.7 55.7 0.0 41.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.8 0.3 0.0 4.4 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 5.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.1 7.9 8.5 1.4 0.3 0.0 2.7 0.0 1.7 0.7 0.0 4.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 54.3 27.1 27.7 51.4 1.3 0.9 58.0 0.0 36.7 57.7 0.0 47.0 LnGrp LOS D C C D A A E D E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1110 992 157 184
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.2 3.9 48.5 48.2
Approach LOS C A D D
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.7 63.7 13.9 29.6 13.8 62.7 9.5 34.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 46.5 17.5 24.5 12.5 47.5 12.5 29.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.2 20.5 7.7 12.9 4.6 3.0 3.4 6.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.8 0.1 0.7 0.1 7.1 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 21.6
HCM 7th LOS C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-18
12-500

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour
4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.
4\
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations '1'1 ++t+ 'I 14 if 'i 11 1)r,
Traffic Volume (vph) 150 715 67 97 671 196 81 33 108 504 35 141 Future Volume (vph) 150 715 67 97 671 196 81 33 108 504 35 141 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 125 0 160 115 145 145 110 110
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 597 738 224 460

9.0 11.2 5.1 10.5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 6
Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 14.8 30.5 16.0 31.7 31.7 17.0 22.5 51.0 56.5 Total Split (%) 12.3% 25.4% 13.3% 26.4% 26.4% 14.2% 18.8% 42.5% 47.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C -Max

10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
None C -Max C -Max None Max None Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-19
12-501

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour 4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'j j 'I 1+t rf 'I I ' 11+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 150 715 67 97 671 196 81 33 108 504 35 141 Future Volume (veh/h) 150 715 67 97 671 196 81 33 108 504 35 141 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj.

Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 163 777 73 105 729 213 88 36 117 548 38 153 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No No No No
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 287 1220 114 144 1301 401 141 71 232 582 770 684 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.08 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.19 0.19 0.33 0.43 0.43 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4748 444 1781 5106 1576 1781 384 1249 1781 1777 1580 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 163 556 294 105 729 213 88 0 153 548 38 153 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1787 1781 1702 1576 1781 0 1633 1781 1777 1580 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.4 17.4 17.6 6.9 14.9 14.0 5.7 0.0 10.1 35.9 1.5 7.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.4 17.4 17.6 6.9 14.9 14.0 5.7 0.0 10.1 35.9 1.5 7.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 287 875 459 144 1301 401 141 0 303 582 770 684 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.64 0.64 0.73 0.56 0.53 0.63 0.00 0.51 0.94 0.05 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 297 875 459 171 1301 401 186 0 303 690 770 684 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.0 39.6 39.7 53.9 38.9 38.5 53.6 0.0 43.9 39.3 19.7 21.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 3.1 5.9 10.7 1.5 4.3 4.5 0.0 5.9 19.4 0.1 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.4 7.4 8.2 3.4 6.2 5.9 2.8 0.0 4.6 18.6 0.6 2.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 55.1 42.7 45.6 64.6 40.4 42.8 58.1 0.0 49.8 58.7 19.8 22.1 LnGrp LOS
Approach Vol, veh/h 1013 1047 241 739
Approach Delay, s/veh 45.5 43.3 52.8 49.1
Approach LOS D D D D

E D D E D D E D E BC
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.2 35.3 14.0 56.5 14.5 35.1 43.7 26.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.5 26.0 12.5 52.0 10.3 27.2 46.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.9 19.6 7.7 9.3 7.4 16.9 37.9 12.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.1 1.3 0.1 3.8 1.3 0.4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ntersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 46.2
HCM 7th LOS D
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-20
12-502

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour
5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' tt vvri t ttt
Traffic Volume (vph) 615 418 327 62 390 658 392 1062 36 414 850 434 Future Volume (vph) 615 418 327 62 390 658 392 1062 36 414 850 434 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 0 155 175 255 0 175 190
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 120 120
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 50 50
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 738 479 794 571

10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5

27.0 52.5 52.5 14.5 40.0 40.0 21.8 33.0 20.0 31.2

22.5% 43.8% 43.8% 12.1% 33.3% 33.3% 18.2% 27.5% 16.7% 26.0%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5

4.5 4.5
Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
None None None None None None None C -Max
Lag Lead
Yes Yes
None C -Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 50.6 (42%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases:
5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-21
12-503

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour 5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

C 4-
t
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' tt r r + ' ttt r
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 615 418 327 62 390 658 392 1062 36 414 850 434 Future Volume (veh/h) 615 418 327 62 390 658 392 1062 36 414 850 434 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 628 427 334 63 398 0 400 1084 37 422 867 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green 0.31 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.14 0.00 0.30 0.24 0.24 0.28 0.22 0.00 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
648 919 408 253 513 1022 1204 41 970 1136
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1576 3456 3554 1585 3456 5069 173 3456 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 628 427 334 63 398 0 400 728 393 422 867 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1777 1576 1728 1777 1585 1728 1702 1838 1728 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 21.5 10.2 11.2 2.1 12.9 0.0 11.1 24.9 24.9 12.0 19.1 0.

Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.5 10.2 11.2 2.1 12.9 0.0 11.1 24.9 24.9 12.0 19.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 648 919 408 253 513 1022 808 437 970 1136 V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 648 1421 630 288 1051 1022 808 437 970 1136 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.( 0 0.97 0.46 0.82 0.25 0.78 0.39 0.90 0.90 0.44 0.76
0 Upstream Filter(I) 0.47 0.47 0.47 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.9 28.2 7.9 52.5 49.5 0.0 33.7 44.4 44.4 35.4 43.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.4 0.2 2.4 0.5 2.6 0.0 0.2 15.0 24.3 0.3 4.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 9.2 3.8 6.1 0.9 5.8 0.0 4.5 11.7 13.8 4.9 8.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 58.2 28.3 10.3 53.0 52.0 0.0 33.9 59.4 68.7 35.7 48.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS
Approach Vol, veh/h 1389 461 1521 1289
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.5 52.2 55.1 44.3
Approach LOS D D E D

E C B D D C E E D D
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 38.2 33.0 13.3 35.5 40.0 31.2 27.0 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 28.5 10.0 48.0 17.3 26.7 22.5 35.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.0 26.9 4.1 13.2 13.1 21.1 23.5 14.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 1.0 0.1 4.0 0.6 2.5 0.0 2.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ntersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 46.6
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-22
12-504

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour
6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
1 4 T
45 1 1 1 1 64
45 1 1 1 1 64
30 30 30
246 314 900

4.2 7.1 20.4
5 5 5 5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:

Control
Other
Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-23
12-505

HCM 7th TWSC EAP (2026) PM Peak Hour
6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 45 1 1 1 1 64
Future Vol, veh/h 45 1 1 1 1 64
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 5 0 0 5
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized
4 T+
- None - None - None
Storage Length 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
Grade, % 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
0 0
0 0
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 49 1 1 1 1 70
Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All
Minor2
Major1 Major2
49 46 76 0
0 Stage 1
41 Stage 2
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 960 1024 1523
8 -

6.42 6.22 4.12

5.42 -

3.518 3.318 2.218
Stage 1 982
Stage 2 1015
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 950 1014 1516
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 950
Stage 1 976
Stage 2 1010
F
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s/v 8.99 3.69

HCM LOS A
EB NB
SB
0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h) 900 - 952 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.053
NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 9
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0
- 0.2
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobsl_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

5.1-24
12-506

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
APPENDIX 6.1: EAPC (2026) INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS

WORKSHEETS
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-507

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-508

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour
1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
--s # 4 IN IP
-
Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 809 47 147 576 46 184
Future Volume (vph) 1 809 47 147 576 46 184
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 145 0 150 0 55
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
1 fft I fff r
449 1296 688

6.8 19.6 15.6
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases 2 1 6 3
custom NA Prot NA Prot Perm
Permitted Phases
5 8
Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 3 8
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 22.5

14.5 22.5 15.0 23.0 22.5 22.5

24.2% 37.5% 25.0% 38.3% 37.5% 37.5%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-1
12-509

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour 1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
1 Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 809 47 147 576 46 184
Future Volume (veh/h) 1 809 47 147 576 46 184
Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 861 50 156 613 49 196
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
A I ttst rf
0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 1583 92 275 2808 534 476
Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.18 0.30 0.30
2 2 2 2 2 2
Sat Flow, veh/h 5103 286 1781 5274 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 593 318 156 613 49 196
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1816 1781 1702 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 8.6 8.6 5.1 6.1 1.2 5.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.6 8.6 5.1 6.1 1.2 5.9
Prop In Lane 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1092 583 275 2808 534 476
V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.55 0.57 0.22 0.09 0.41
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1092 583 312 2808 534 476
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.8 16.8 26.5 13.6 15.1 16.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 3.6 1.8 0.2 0.3 2.6
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.1 3.6 2.2 1.9 0.5 2.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.7 20.4 28.3 13.7 15.5 19.4
LnGrp LOS B C C B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 911 769 245
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.3 16.7 18.6
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.8 23.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.5 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 10.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.2
HCM 7th LOS B
1 2
6 8
1 37.5 22.5

18.5 18.0

8.1 7.9

0.1 3.1

2.7 0.5
Notes
User approved ignoring U -Turning movement.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-2
12-510

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.
-► `t f 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 rir 4 r
Traffic Volume (vph) 53 3 4 1 8 160 6 17 1 62 27 108
Future Volume (vph) 53 3 4 1 8 160 6 17 1 62 27 108
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 50 0 50
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 90 90 90 90
30 30 30 30
743 787 435 688

16.9 4.3 9.9 15.4
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Stop Free Free
ntersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-3
12-511

HCM 7th TWSC EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4 r 4 r
Traffic Vol, veh/h 53 3 4 1 8 160 6 17 1 62 27 108
Future Vol, veh/h 53 3 4 1 8 160 6 17 1 62 27 108
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized
- None - None - - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 50 - 50
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0
Grade, % 0 - - 0 - 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 58 3 4 1 9 174 7 18 1 67 29 117
Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All 210 207 39 207 323 28 152 0 0 25 0 0 Stage 1 169 169 - 37 37 - -
Stage 2 41 38 - 171 287 - -
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 - PotCap-1 Maneuver 747 690 1032 750 594 1047 1429 - - 1590 1111 Stage 1 833 759 - 979 865 - -
Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Stage 2 974 864 - 831 675
Platoon blocked,
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 576 648 1022 699 559 1037 1422
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 5/b b4t3 - b99 559
- 1582
Stage 1 790 719 - 970 856
Stage 2 795 856 - 781 640
F
Approach
HCM

EB WB NB SB
Control Delay, s/v11.78 9.44 1.89 2.32

HCM LOS
B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 470 - - 596 993 1254
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.109 0.185 0.043
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 0 - 11.8 9.4 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.7 0.1 -
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-4
12-512

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour
3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations i + t+ ' 141 rf '1 ii. "i t+
Traffic Volume (vph) 46 866 43 15 747 11 21 2 11 5 3 18 Future Volume (vph) 46 866 43 15 747 11 21 2 11 5 3 18
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 155 0 150 85 180 180 135 0
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 120 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1296 597 233 614

19.6 9.0 5.3 14.0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases
6 Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 19.0 57.0 19.0 57.0 57.0 19.0 27.0 17.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 15.8% 47.5% 15.8% 47.5% 47.5% 15.8% 22.5% 14.2% 20.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-5
12-513

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour 3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations W.+ ' 141 'I I II T,
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 866 43 15 747 11 21 2 11 5 3 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 866 43 15 747 11 21 2 11 5 3 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
47 884 44 15 762 11 21 2 11 5 3 18
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 228 3011 150 58 2917 903 75 50 273 23 39 235
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.91 0.91 0.05 0.86 0.86 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.17 0.17 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4981 247 1781 5106 1581 1781 248 1364 1781 230 1378 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 603 325 15 762 11 21 0 13 5 0 21 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1825 1781 1702 1581 1781 0 1613 1781 0 1608 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 2.7 2.7 1.0 3.3 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.0 1.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 2.7 2.7 1.0 3.3 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.0 1.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 228 2058 1103 58 2917 903 75 0 323 23 0 275 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.00 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 418 2058 1103 215 2917 903 215 0 323 186 0 275 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.2 2.3 2.3 55.6 3.9 3.7 55.7 0.0 38.7 58.6 0.0 41.i Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.3 0.6 2.1 0.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.2 4.7 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.6 2.7 2.9 57.8 4.1 3.7 57.7 0.0 38.9 63.4 0.0 42.3 LnGrp LOS D A A E A A E D E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 975 788 34 26
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.1 5.1 50.6 46.4
Approach LOS A A D D
0 Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.4 77.0 9.5 25.0 12.4 73.1 6.0 28.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.5 52.5 14.5 20.5 14.5 52.5 12.5 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 4.7 3.4 3.3 3.5 5.3 2.3 2.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 5.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.6
HCM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
7th LOS A
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-6
12-514

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour
4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi +4'4 ' 14 r '1 ►j 11+
Traffic Volume (vph) 80 740 62 53 660 130 70 9 47 157 5 44 Future Volume (vph) 80 740 62 53 660 130 70 9 47 157 5 44 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 125 0 160 115 145 145 110 110
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 597 738 224 460

9.0 11.2 5.1 10.5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases
6 Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 17.0 44.0 19.0 46.0 46.0 20.0 25.0 32.0 37.0 Total Split (%) 14.2% 36.7% 15.8% 38.3% 38.3% 16.7% 20.8% 26.7% 30.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

Synchro 12 Report

6.1-7
12-515

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour 4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ri +1'4 ' 14 ri 'I I ►i +t+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 80 740 62 53 660 130 70 9 47 157 5 44 Future Volume (veh/h) 80 740 62 53 660 130 70 9 47 157 5 44 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
84 779 65 56 695 137 74 9 49 165 5 46
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 270 2077 172 125 2168 671 136 59 323 196 481 427 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.61 0.61 0.07 0.42 0.42 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.11 0.27 0.27 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4802 399 1781 5106 1579 1781 251 1364 1781 1777 1576 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 84 551 293 56 695 137 74 0 58 165 5 46 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1797 1781 1702 1579 1781 0 1615 1781 1777 1576 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 9.9 10.0 3.6 10.9 6.6 4.8 0.0 3.4 10.9 0.2 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 9.9 10.0 3.6 10.9 6.6 4.8 0.0 3.4 10.9 0.2 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 270 1472 777 125 2168 671 136 0 383 196 481 427 V/C Ratio(X) 0.31 0.37 0.38 0.45 0.32 0.20 0.54 0.00 0.15 0.84 0.01 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 360 1472 777 215 2168 671 230 0 383 408 481 427 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.86 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.4 15.4 15.4 53.5 23.0 21.7 53.4 0.0 36.2 52.4 32.0 32.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.7 1.3 2.1 0.3 0.6 3.4 0.0 0.8 9.3 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 3.5 3.8 1.7 4.3 2.6 2.3 0.0 1.4 5.4 0.1 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.1 16.1 16.7 55.7 23.3 22.3 56.8 0.0 37.1 61.7 32.0 33.4 LnGrp LOS D B B E C C E D E C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 928 888 132 216
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.5 25.2 48.1 55.0
Approach LOS B C D D
0 Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 56.4 13.7 37.0 13.9 55.5 17.7 32.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.5 39.5 15.5 32.5 12.5 41.5 27.5 20.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 12.0 6.8 4.6 4.7 12.9 12.9 5.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 5.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 5.2 0.4 0.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ntersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 27.1
HCM 7th LOS C
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-8
12-516

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour
5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' idt rf tt + 'j' '}'
Traffic Volume (vph) 386 294 259 68 266 309 194 754 32 523 1738 508 Future Volume (vph) 386 294 259 68 266 309 194 754 32 523 1738 508 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 0 155 175 255 0 175 190
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 120 120
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 50 50
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 738 479 794 571

11.2 7.3 10.8 7.8
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Free
7 4
3 8
5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 Free
Detector Phase
7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode

10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5

24.0 33.5 33.5 14.5 24.0 24.0 15.0 39.7 32.3 57.0

20.0% 27.9% 27.9% 12.1% 20.0% 20.0% 12.5% 33.1% 26.9% 47.5%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead
None None None None None None None C -Max
None C -Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 11.6 (10%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.
•
•
T02 (R)
06 (R)
05 08
TO 04
07 r o3
1 Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-9
12-517

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour 5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' idt r r + t}t r
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 386 294 259 68 266 309 194 754 32 523 1738 508 Future Volume (veh/h) 386 294 259 68 266 309 194 754 32 523 1738 508 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 411 313 276 72 283 0 206 802 34 556 1849 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.00 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.44 0.00 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
586 721 319 262 388 462 1473 62 961 2234
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 3554 1573 3456 3554 1585 3456 5023 212 3456 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 411 313 276 72 283 0 206 543 293 556 1849 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1777 1573 1728 1777 1585 1728 1702 1831 1728 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.0 10.2 20.8 2.4 9.2 0.0 6.6 16.1 16.2 16.6 38.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.0 10.2 20.8 2.4 9.2 0.0 6.6 16.1 16.2 16.6 38.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 586 721 319 262 388 462 999 537 961 2234 V/C Ratio(X) 0.70 0.43 0.86 0.27 0.73 0.45 0.54 0.55 0.58 0.83 I Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 586 859 380 288 577 462 999 537 961 2234 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.7 49.4 54.4 52.3 51.7 0.0 47.9 35.6 35.7 37.3 29.8 0.

Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.3 0.4 14.6 0.6 2.6 0.0 0.7 2.1 4.0 0.9 3.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 6.7 4.7 10.1 1.0 4.2 0.0 2.8 6.7 7.5 6.8 15.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 57.0 49.7 68.9 52.9 54.4 0.0 48.5 37.8 39.6 38.1 33.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D E D D D D D D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1000 355 1042 2405
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.0 54.1 40.4 34.5
Approach LOS E D D C
0 0
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 37.9 39.7 13.6 28.8 20.6 57.0 24.8 17.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.8 35.2 10.0 29.0 10.5 52.5 19.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.6 18.2 4.4 22.8 8.6 40.3 16.0 11.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 4.4 0.1 1.5 0.1 8.7 0.5 1.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 42.1
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-10
12-518

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour
6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
1 4 T
61 1 1 107 41 24
61 1 1 107 41 24
30 30 30
246 314 900

4.2 7.1 20.4
5 5 5 5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type:

Control
Other
Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-11
12-519

HCM 7th TWSC EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour
6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 1 1 107 41 24
Future Vol, veh/h 61 1 1 107 41 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 5 0 0 5
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized
4 I
- None - None - None
Storage Length 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0
Grade, %
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
0 0 0
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 66 1 1 116 45 26
Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All 186 68 76 0 - 0
Minor2 Major1 Major2
Stage 1 63
Stage 2 123 - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 803 996 1523
Stage 1 960 -
Stage 2 902
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 795 986 1516
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 795
Stage 1 955
Stage 2 898
F
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.93 0.07 0

HCM LOS A

EB NB SB
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 17 - 797 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.085
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 9.9
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.3 - -
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-12
12-520

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour
1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 1012 65 202 1100 43 178
Future Volume (vph) 1 1012 65 202 1100 43 178
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 145 0 150 0 55
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
1 A +ft I ttst r
449 1296 688

5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 22.5

14.5 22.5 15.0 23.0 22.5 22.5

24.2% 37.5% 25.0% 38.3% 37.5% 37.5%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-13
12-521

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour 1: Key Largo Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
1 Lane Configurations ,q W.+ 144' II r
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 1012 65 202 1100 43 178
Future Volume (veh/h) 1 1012 65 202 1100 43 178
Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1100 71 220 1196 47 193
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
0 0 0 0 0 0

0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
No No No
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 1531 99 289 2808 534 476
Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.22 0.73 0.30 0.30
2 2 2 2 2 2
Sat Flow, veh/h 5067 316 1781 5274 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 764 407 220 1196 47 193
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1810 1781 1702 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 11.9 12.0 7.0 5.5 1.1 5.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.9 12.0 7.0 5.5 1.1 5.8
Prop In Lane 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1064 566 289 2808 534 476
V/C Ratio(X) 0.72 0.72 0.76 0.43 0.09 0.41
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1064 566 312 2808 534 476
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.3 18.3 22.4 4.4 15.1 16.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.2 7.7 8.4 0.4 0.3 2.6
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.5 5.4 3.1 1.2 0.5 2.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 22.5 26.0 30.8 4.8 15.4 19.3
LnGrp LOS
Approach Vol, veh/h 1171 1416 240
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.7 8.8 18.5
Approach LOS C A B

C C C A B B
•
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.2 23.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.5 18.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.0 14.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.5 5.6 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 15.8
HCM 7th LOS B
1 2
6 8

37.5 22.5

18.5 18.0

7.5 7.8
Notes
User approved ignoring U -Turning movement.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-14
12-522

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 150 0 50 0 50
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 4 4 4 rir ri
99 9 8 1 6 117 3 20 1 166 16 61
99 9 8 1 6 117 3 20 1 166 16 61
90 90 90 90
30 30 30 30
743 785 435 688

16.9 4.3 9.9 15.4
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Stop Free Free
ntersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-15
12-523

HCM 7th TWSC EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour
2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 10.1
Moveme
it

EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
4+ 4 r 4 r
99 9 8 1 6 117 3 20 1 166 16 61
99 9 8 1 6 117 3 20 1 166 16 61
5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5
Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free - None
- None
- None
- None
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0
Grade, %
Peak Hour Factor
- 50
- 50
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76
-111
Heavy Vehicles,
Mvmt Flow 130 12 11
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 8 154 4 26 1 218 21 80
Major/Minor Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 506 503 31 508 582 36 106
Minor1
Major1
Major2
0 0 33 0 0
Stage 1 463 463 - 39 39
Stage 2
43 41 - 469 543
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 477 471 1043 475 424 1036 1485
- 4.12
- 6.12 5.52
- 2.218
- 1579
Stage 1 579 564
Stage 2 971 861 - 575 520
- 976 862
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 334 396 1033 386 357 1026 1478
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 334 396
- 1572
- 386 357
Stage 1 491 478 - 968 856
Stage 2 812 855 - 470 440
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s/v22.55

HCM LOS
EB
WB
NB
SB

9.7 0.93

5.23 C
A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
235 - - 355 929 1553 -

0.003
- 0.43 0.176 0.139
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.4 0 - 22.6 9.7 7.7 0
HCM Lane LOS

A A - C A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0 - 2.1 0.6 0.5
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-16
12-524

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour
3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44'(r, ' t41 if '1 't ►i t+
Traffic Volume (vph) 73 1056 80 47 1085 8 85 3 60 19 6 144 Future Volume (vph) 73 1056 80 47 1085 8 85 3 60 19 6 144 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 155 0 150 85 180 180 135 0
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 120 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1296 597 233 614

19.6 9.0 5.3 14.0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6
3 8
7 4
Permitted Phases
6 Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 16.0 55.0 17.0 56.0 56.0 21.0 32.0 16.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 45.8% 14.2% 46.7% 46.7% 17.5% 26.7% 13.3% 22.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-17
12-525

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour 3: George Montgomery/Miriam Wy. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) +0 'I t4 ic '1 't ' ')F,
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 73 1056 80 47 1085 8 85 3 60 19 6 144 Future Volume (veh/h) 73 1056 80 47 1085 8 85 3 60 19 6 144 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj.

Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)
Parking Bus, Adj
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No No No No
81 1173 89 52 1206 9 94 3 67 21 7 160
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 269 2469 187 122 2559 792 142 16 348 75 13 290 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.51 0.51 0.07 0.50 0.50 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.19 0.19 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4839 367 1781 5106 1580 1781 68 1517 1781 66 1517 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 81 825 437 52 1206 9 94 0 70 21 0 167 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1802 1781 1702 1580 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 18.8 18.8 3.4 18.5 0.3 6.2 0.0 4.3 1.4 0.0 11.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 18.8 18.8 3.4 18.5 0.3 6.2 0.0 4.3 1.4 0.0 11.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 269 1737 920 122 2559 792 142 0 363 75 0 303 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.47 0.48 0.43 0.47 0.01 0.66 0.00 0.19 0.28 0.00 0.55 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 331 1737 920 186 2559 792 245 0 363 171 0 303 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.56 0.56 0.56 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.3 19.0 19.0 53.6 19.5 15.0 53.6 0.0 37.3 55.7 0.0 43.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.6 1.1 1.3 0.4 0.0 5.2 0.0 1.2 2.0 0.0 7.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.1 7.1 7.7 1.5 7.0 0.1 3.0 0.0 1.8 0.7 0.0 5.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 52.7 19.6 20.1 54.9 19.9 15.0 58.8 0.0 38.5 57.7 0.0 50.9 LnGrp LOS D B C D BB E D E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1343 1267 164 188
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.8 21.3 50.1 51.7
Approach LOS C C D D
0 Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.7 65.7 14.1 27.5 13.8 64.6 9.5 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.5 50.5 16.5 22.5 11.5 51.5 11.5 27.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.4 20.8 8.2 13.4 4.7 20.5 3.4 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.2 0.1 0.6 0.1 9.4 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 25.0
HCM 7th LOS C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-18
12-526

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour
4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ri +0 'I 1414. if '1 '4 11 +T,
Traffic Volume (vph) 155 909 70 99 905 201 86 33 112 512 35 149 Future Volume (vph) 155 909 70 99 905 201 86 33 112 512 35 149 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 125 0 160 115 145 145 110 110
Storage Lanes 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 597 738 224 460

9.0 11.2 5.1 10.5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases
5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases
6 Detector Phase
5 2 1 6 6 3 8 7 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 14.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 14.5 33.2 15.6 34.3 34.3 17.4 22.5 48.7 53.8 Total Split (%) 12.1% 27.7% 13.0% 28.6% 28.6% 14.5% 18.8% 40.6% 44.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lead Lag
Yes Yes
None C -Max
Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
None C -Max C -Max None Max
Lead Lag
Yes Yes
None Max
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Splits and Phases:
4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-19
12-527

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour 4: Dinah Shore Dr. & Shoppers Ln.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'I) ++T 'I ttst rf ' T ' 111+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 155 909 70 99 905 201 86 33 112 512 35 149 Future Volume (veh/h) 155 909 70 99 905 201 86 33 112 512 35 149 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 168 988 76 108 984 218 93 36 122 557 38 162 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap,veh/h 287 1346 103 144 1412 436 142 60 202 588 730 649 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.41 0.41 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 4834 371 1781 5106 1576 1781 371 1258 1781 1777 1579 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 168 695 369 108 984 218 93 0 158 557 38 162 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1702 1801 1781 1702 1576 1781 0 1630 1781 1777 1579 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 22.2 22.3 7.1 20.7 13.9 6.1 0.0 10.8 36.6 1.5 8.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.6 22.2 22.3 7.1 20.7 13.9 6.1 0.0 10.8 36.6 1.5 8.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 287 948 502 144 1412 436 142 0 261 588 730 649 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.73 0.74 0.75 0.70 0.50 0.66 0.00 0.60 0.95 0.05 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 288 948 502 165 1412 436 191 0 261 656 730 649 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.64 0.64 0.64 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.0 39.2 39.3 53.9 38.9 36.4 53.6 0.0 46.8 39.2 21.3 23.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 4.2 7.8 10.0 1.8 2.6 5.1 0.0 10.0 21.8 0.1 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.5 9.5 10.6 3.5 8.6 5.7 2.9 0.0 5.1 19.3 0.7 3.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 55.5 43.4 47.0 63.9 40.7 39.1 58.7 0.0 56.8 61.0 21.4 24.1 LnGrp LOS
Approach Vol, veh/h 1232 1310 251 757
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.2 42.4 57.5 51.1
Approach LOS D D E D
0 E D D E D D E E E C C
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.2 37.9 14.0 53.8 14.5 37.7 44.1 23.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.1 28.7 12.9 49.3 10.0 29.8 44.2 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.1 24.3 8.1 10.1 7.6 22.7 38.6 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.4 0.1 1.3 0.1 3.8 1.0 0.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ntersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 46.6
HCM 7th LOS D
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-20
12-528

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour
5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 0 155 175 255 0 175 190
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 0 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 120 120 120
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 50 50
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1).1 rf tt + ttt rf
673 451 443 63 421 685 515 1554 37 444 1396 522
673 451 443 63 421 685 515 1554 37 444 1396 522
738 479 794 571

11.2 7.3 10.8 7.8
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Free
7 4
3 8
5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 Free
Detector Phase
7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode

10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0

25.0 45.5 45.5 14.5 35.0 35.0 19.0 42.0 18.0 41.0

20.8% 37.9% 37.9% 12.1% 29.2% 29.2% 15.8% 35.0% 15.0% 34.2%

3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
None None None None None None None C -Max None C -Max
Intersection Summary
A
rea Type: Other
•
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 69.6 (58%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
•
Splits and Phases:
5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Synchro 12 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
•

6.1-21
12-529

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour 5: Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr.

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' tt r r + "Pi t}t r
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 673 451 443 63 421 685 515 1554 37 444 1396 522 Future Volume (veh/h) 673 451 443 63 421 685 515 1554 37 444 1396 522 Initial Q (Qb), veh
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 687 460 452 64 430 0 526 1586 38 453 1424 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent Heavy Veh, %
Cap, veh/h
Arrive On Green 0.38 0.51 0.51 0.07 0.15 0.00 0.17 0.31 0.31 0.16 0.30 0.00 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
789 1089 483 254 538 574 1603 38 545 1553
SatFlow,veh/h 3456 3554 1577 3456 3554 1585 3456 5129 123 3456 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 687 460 452 64 430 0 526 1053 571 453 1424 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 1777 1577 1728 1777 1585 1728 1702 1848 1728 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 22.1 9.7 32.2 2.1 14.0 0.0 18.0 36.9 36.9 15.2 32.3 0.

Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 22.1 9.7 32.2 2.1 14.0 0.0 18.0 36.9 36.9 15.2 32.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 789 1089 483 254 538 574 1064 577 545 1553 V/C Ratio(X)
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 789 1214 539 288 903 574 1064 577 545 1553 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.( 0 0

0.87 0.42 0.94 0.25 0.80 0.92 0.99 0.99 0.83 0.92
0 Upstream Filter(I) 0.34 0.34 0.34 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.5 22.7 28.2 52.5 49.2 0.0 49.2 41.1 41.1 49.0 40.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.1 10.2 0.5 2.8 0.0 19.7 25.2 35.0 10.5 10.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 8.0 3.5 10.3 0.9 6.3 0.0 9.0 18.3 21.4 7.1 14.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 39.4 22.8 38.4 53.0 51.9 0.0 68.9 66.2 76.1 59.5 50.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D D E E E E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1599 494 2150 1877
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.3 52.1 69.5 52.6
Approach LOS C D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.4 42.0 13.3 41.3 24.4 41.0 31.9 22.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 37.5 10.0 41.0 14.5 36.5 20.5 30.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.2 38.9 4.1 34.2 20.0 34.3 24.1 16.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.5 0.0 1.7 0.0 2.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 53.7
HCM 7th LOS D
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [WBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-22
12-530

Lanes, Volumes, Timings EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour
6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations ► r 4 1
Traffic Volume (vph) 45 1 1 78 111 64
Future Volume (vph) 45 1 1 78 111 64
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
1 30 30 30
246 314 900

4.2 7.1 20.4
5 5 5 5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control
Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600_160001_15800115868102_LOS\Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-23
12-531

HCM 7th TWSC EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour
6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 45 1 1 78 111 64
Future Vol, veh/h 45 1 1 78 111 64
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 5 5 0 0 5
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized
4 T+
- None - None - None
Storage Length 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0
Grade, %
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
0 0 0
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 49 1 1 85 121 70
Major/Minor
Conflicting Flow All 252 165 195 0 - 0
Minor2 Major1 Major2
Stage 1 160
Stage 2 92 - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 736 879 1378
Stage 1 868 -
Stage 2 932
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 729 871 1371
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 729
Stage 1 864
Stage 2 927
F
Approach
HCM Control Delay, s/v10.28 0.1 0

HCM LOS B

EB NB SB
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 23 - 731
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.068
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 0 10.3
HCM Lane LOS A A B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 -
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis Synchro 12 Report
F:1UXRjobsl_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.1-24
12-532

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
APPENDIX 6.2: EAPC (2026) QUEUEING ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-533

URBAN

CROSSROADS
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
15868-04 TA Report.docx
12-534

Queuing and Blocking Report EAPC (2026) AM Peak Hour
Intersection: 2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served

LTR LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft) 26 34 2 2
95th Queue (ft) 52 52 13 16
Link Distance (ft) 701 716 406
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Q
55 45 6 11
50 0
aeuing Penalty (veh) 0
Intersection: 6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Movement EB
Directions Served LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 42
Average Queue (ft) 27
95th Queue (ft) 47
Link Distance (ft) 216
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis SimTraffic Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.2-1
12-535

Queuing and Blocking Report EAPC (2026) PM Peak Hour
Intersection: 2: Via Vail & Key Largo Av.

Movement EB WB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 73 55 29
Average Queue (ft) 42 34 9
95th Queue (ft) 77 58 35
Link Distance (ft) 701 714 596
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Intersection: 6: Via Vail & Project Entry
Movement EB NB
Directions Served LR LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 34 12
Average Queue (ft) 24 2
95th Queue (ft) 50 13
Link Distance (ft) 216 292
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Zone Summary
Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis SimTraffic Report
F:1UXRjobs1_15600160001_15800115868102LOS1Synchro102 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

6.2-2
12-536

URBAN
C�OSSOA
DATE: April 2, 2024
TO: Nicole Criste, Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc.

FROM: John Kain and Marlie Whiteman, Urban Crossroads, Inc.

JOB NO: 15868-03 VMT Screening.docx

VIA VAIL VILLAGE VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) SCREENING

ANALYSIS
Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis for the Via Vail Village (Project), which is located south of the future extension of Via Vail, east of Key Largo Avenue in Rancho Mirage.

PROJECT OVERVIEW
The proposed Project includes the development of consists of 236 affordable apartment dwelling units. The preliminary Project site plan is shown on Exhibit A.

BACKGROUND
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires all lead agencies to adopt VMT as the measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects.

City of Rancho Mirage Resolution 2021-06 (City Guidelines) aligns the City's VMT analysis policy with SB 743 and the City's goals as set forth in the General Plan Update (2017). The purpose of the policy is to comply with State laws while maintaining the resort residential character of the community.

The City's VMT policy establishes VMT as the metric to measure transportation impacts in conformance with CEQA.

VMT SCREENING
Exhibit A of Resolution 2021-06 sets forth screening criteria under which Projects are not required to submit detailed VMT analysis. This guidance for determination of non -significant VMT impact is primarily intended to avoid unnecessary analysis and findings that would be inconsistent with the intent of SB 743. VMT screening criteria for development projects include the following:
12-537
DS

URB AN CROSSROADS

VIA VAIL

KEY LARGO AVENUE
LEGEND :
= FUTURE ROADWAY

PROPERTY LINE
EXHIBIT A: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
Via Vail Village Traffic Analysis

FOR CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS PURPOSES, VIA VAIL IS ASSUMED TO BE EXTENDED SOUTHERLY BY OTHERS TO SERVE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. 15868 - Scope. dwg
2 Nicole Criste, Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc.

April 2, 2024

Page 3 of 4 ends

TABLE 1: SCREENING FOR LAND USE PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM VMT ANALYSIS Screening Steps
Description Result

1. Small Projects
Screening

2. Projects Near High
Quality Transit

3. Affordable Housing

4. Map Based
Screening

5. Redevelopment
Projects
Projects with low trip generation based on the County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Screening Tables resulting in a 3,000 metric tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent per year screening level threshold. Specific examples include single family housing projects less than or equal to 110 dwelling units, multi -family housing projects less than or equal to 147 dwelling units, and retail buildings with area less than or equal to 60,000 sf.

Projects within a half mile of an existing major transit stop which maintains a service interval frequency of 15 minutes or less during peak commute periods.

Projects with a high percentage of affordable units as determined by the Planning and Engineering departments.

Projects within an area of development under threshold as shown on screening map allowed by the Engineering Department.

Projects which replace an existing VMT-generating land use and do not result in a net overall increase in VMT.

PROJECT HIGH PERCENTAGE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Does not meet
Does not meet
Meets
Meets
Does not meet
Resolution 2021-06 indicates that projects in which "a high percentage of affordable housing is provided as determined by the Planning and Engineering Departments" can be presumed to have non -significant VMT impacts.

The Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, December 2018) states that affordable housing generally improves jobs -housing match, shortens commutes and reduces VMT. This technical advisory concludes that low income housing generates less VMT than market -rate housing.

All (100%) of the 236 Project residential units are affordable housing. In comparison, recent residential projects in Rancho Mirage have not included an affordable housing component.

The Project is located near to existing off -site retail. Adding affordable housing to this location, with existing off -site retail/service jobs located at Monterey Marketplace and Desert Gateway shopping centers along with Costco Wholesale, etc. provides housing opportunities for current employees in the area. Low -wage workers in particular would be more likely to choose a residential location close to their workplace, if one is available.

PROJECT MAP BASED SCREENING
The County Guidelines note that "residential and office projects that locate in areas with low VMT, and that incorporate similar features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit accessibility), will tend to

URBAN CROSSROADS
3 158643I21,,}5err cx

Nicole Criste, Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc.

April 2, 2024

Page 4 of 4 ends

exhibit similarly low VMT."1 Urban Crossroads has obtained a VMT data table from County Staff for all TAZs within Riverside County that identifies VMT per capita and VMT per employee for the purposes of identifying low VMT areas. The data utilizes the sub -regional Riverside Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM) to measure baseline VMT performance for individual TAZ's and a comparison was made to the applicable impact threshold (e.g., VMT per employee for office or industrial land uses and VMT per capita for residential land uses). The Project's TAZ was identified in the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM) as TAZ 4648. The County's data table identifies the Project's TAZ 4648 to generate 12.9604 VMT per capita. Whereas the County regional threshold is 15.2 VMT per capital. The Project is located in a low VMT area for residential uses.

CONCLUSION
The Project was evaluated against screening criteria as outlined in the City Guidelines. Based on the results of this screening analysis the following findings are made:
• The Project's residential component meets the Project Type Screening criteria for Affordable Housing by having 100% affordable housing.
• The Project's affordable housing will allow nearby interaction between Project residents, retail jobs, and retail services which will reduce auto VMT by encouraging pedestrian and bicycle activity. This determination of non -significant VMT impact is consistent with the intent of SB-743.
• The Project's location in a low VMT area for residential uses meets the map -based screening criteria and no further analysis is necessary.

If you have any questions, please contact us directly at [email protected] for John or [email protected] for Marlie.
1 Technical Advisory; Page 12
'County Guidelines; Page 22

URBAN CROSSROADS
4 15864312 d cx

Q MIRAGG ATTATCHMENT 4
0 CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270-2898 (760) 324-4511/328-2266

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION To: ® Office of Planning and Research
Sacramento, CA 95814
® Chief Deputy County Clerk
Riverside, CA 92501
Project Title/Case Nos. Via Vail Apartments - Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP24-0002 Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0005
Applicant: Pacific West Communities, Inc.

Project Location: South of Via Vail, East of Key Largo Avenue, West of Monterey Avenue Assessor's Parcel Number: 685-090-017
Project Description: The 10± -acre subject site is located on the southern side of Via Vail, between Monterey Avenue and Key Largo Avenue in Rancho Mirage. The subject property is located on the northeastern portion of a larger parcel of land that measures ±52 acres in size. The larger parcel is a City - owned property known as the Monterey and Dinah Shore Land Holding and is intended for future single- and multi -family housing for very low- and low-income earning households. The proposed Project, Via Vail Apartments, is an affordable housing development. The site will consist of fifteen (15) two-story apartment buildings for a total of 236 dwelling units. All of the dwelling units except the managers' units are designated for affordable housing. Of the 236 dwelling units, 100 units will be one -bedroom apartments, 62 units will be two -bedroom apartments, and 74 units will be three -bedroom apartments. The proposed Project will have a density capacity of approximately 24 dwelling units/acre.

Notice of Determination
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Public Resources Code, Section 21108 or 21152. The City of Rancho Mirage has approved the above described project on , 2024 and has determined:

1. The project ❑will ® will not have a significant effect/impact on the environment.

2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

3. // A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

4. Mitigation measures ® were ❑ were not made conditions of approval for the project.

5. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan ® was ❑ was not adopted for this project.

6. A Statement of Overriding Considerations ❑ was ® was not adopted for this project.

7. Findings ® were ❑ were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

The City Council adopted the following Finding: The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This is to certify that the project file and record of project approval are available to the general public at: City of Rancho Mirage, 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270.

Mitigated Negative Declaration - Rancho Mirage City Council Date:

Pilar Lopez
Senior Planner
I hereby certify that the City of Rancho Mirage has made the above fmdings of fact and that based upon the Mitigated Negative Declaration and hearing record the project will not have a significant effect on the environment.

Date:
® Lead Agency ❑ Responsible Agency
Pilar Lopez
Senior Planner
12-541

ATTACHMENT 5
RESOLUTION NO. 2024 -PC -05

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: 1) ADOPT RESOLUTION [NEXT IN LINE] APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND 2)

ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN

REGARDING VIA VAIL APARTMENTS ON PROPERTY HAVING ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 685-090-011
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Mirage is a charter city and a municipal corporation of the State of California, and recognized as a political subdivision of the State of California for certain purpose; and
WHEREAS, Pacific West Communities, Inc. ("Pacific") and the Housing Authority of Rancho Mirage (the "Housing Authority") entered into an agreement entitled Affordable Housing Disposition and Development Agreement, dates as of December 21, 2023, for the disposition of Housing Authority Property to Pacific, upon satisfaction of various terms ad conditions, including, but not limited to, obtaining all project entitlements from the City; and
WHEREAS, Pacific submitted an application for a Preliminary Development Plan for an affordable housing development — Via Vail Apartments — on approximately ten acres located on the southern side of Vial Vai, between Monterey Avenue and Key large Avenue, having Assessor's Parcel Number 685-090-017 (the "Subject Property"), as depicted and described in more particularity on Exhibit "A", consisting of fifteen (15) two- story apartment building for a total of 236 dwelling units, 100 units of which will be one - bedroom apartments, 62 units of which will be two -bedroom apartments, and 74 units will be three -bedroom apartments, all of which, with the exception of managers' units, are designates for affordable housing, with a density capacity of approximately 24 dwelling units per acre (the "Proposed Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve and adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") and mitigation monitoring and reporting program ("MMRP"), attached hereto and incorporated herein in the proposed City Council Resolution as set forth in Exhibit "B") based upon its determination that there is no substantial evidence in the whole record before it that the Proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment that has not been mitigated to a level of less than significant, and that the MND reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis of the Proposed Project and its potential impacts on the environment consistent with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
1 12-542

SECTION 1. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS.

That the foregoing Recitals and attached Exhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

SECTION 2. EVIDENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD.

That the Planning Commission conducted a noticed Public Hearing on June 27, 2024, and considered all of the evidence submitted into the administrative record for the Proposed Project, including, but not limited to, the following, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference:
(a) Rancho Mirage Municipal Code;
(b) Rancho Mirage General Plan and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code and all relevant provisions contained therein; (c) Preliminary Development Plan PDP24-0002
(d) Initial Study, Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0005; (e) Notice of Intent to adopt MND;
(f) MND and MMRP (SCH#2024060305);
(g) Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing scheduled for June 27, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, located at City Hall at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California;
(h) Planning Commission Staff Report, attachments and Staff presentation for the Proposed Project, and all public documents, records and references related thereto submitted or provided at or prior to the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Public Hearing;
(i) Testimony and/or comments from Developer and its representatives submitted or provided at, or prior to, the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Public Hearing; and
(j) Testimony and/or comments from all persons that were provided in written format or correspondence, at, or prior to, the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Public Hearing.

SECTION 3. FINDINGS.

That based on the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record for the Proposed Project, as set forth and described herein, the Planning Commission finds, acknowledge, accept, and approve, and make the following Findings and Determinations, and recommends the City Council finds that:
a) The proposed development is:
1) Allowed within the respective zoning district;
2) Generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of title 17(Zoning) that are necessary to carry out the purpose and requirements of the respective zoning district, including prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines; and
3) Consistent with the general plan and specific plan, if applicable; 2 12-543

b) The proposed project would produce a comprehensive development incorporating a more enhanced environment and architectural excellence (e.g., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, increased amounts of landscaping and open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking facilities, etc.) than would normally be possible under more standard district development requirements;
c) The design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle access and public services and utilities (e.g., drainage, fire protection, sewers, water, etc.), would ensure that the proposed development would not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and the respective zoning district; d) The design, location, and proposed uses would be compatible with the character of existing development in the surrounding neighborhood;
e) The subject site (Subject Property) is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of development being proposed; and
f) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and there would be no potential significant negative effects upon environmental quality and natural resources that would not be properly mitigated and monitored, unless findings are made in compliance with CEQA.

SECTION 4. RECOMMENDATIONS.

That based on the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record for the Proposed Project, the Planning Commission Findings, as set forth and described herein, and the findings and determinations set forth in the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Staff Report and the attached resolutions, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
a) Approve and Adopt the aftached Resolution, adopting the MND and MMRP; and
b) Approve and Adopt the aftached Resolution, approving the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP24-0002)
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY.

That if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of Resolution or any portion of the Administrative Record for the Proposed Project be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any 3 12-544

preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 7. CERTIFICATION.

That the Secretary to the Planning Commission shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law.

SECTION 8. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.

That all provisions of any resolution in effect prior to the effective date of this Resolution as adopted by the Planning Commission that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution, are hereby repealed.
[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
4 12-545

PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 27th day of June, 2024.
pcce
Pamela Chanter, Vice Chair
ATTEST:

Kristie Ramos, Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Colin D. Kirkpatrick, City Attorney
5 12-546

EXHIBIT "A"

SUBJECT PROPERTY
(SEE ATTACHED)
6 12-547

Exhibit "A"
Subject Property
Legal Description
That portion of the property described in Grant Deed recorded November 15, 1983 as Instrument No. 237642, Official Records of Riverside County, State of California, located within the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 4 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, described as follows:

COMMENCING at the center quarter comer of said Section 30 as shown on Record of Survey filed in Book 147, Page 6, of Records of Surveys, Official Records of said County; Thence North 89A°35'36" East 667 .17 feet along the south line of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter of said Section 30;
Thence parallel with the east line of said southwest quarter North 00A°03 '04" East 1035.71 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing along said parallel line, Nolih 00A°03 '04" East 771.10 feet to a point on the southerly line of Via Vail being 88 feet in width as shown on Parcel Map No. 27225, on file in Book 178, Pages 63 through 68 of Parcel Maps, Official Records of said County;
Thence South 89A°31 '03" East 156.03 feet along said southerly line of Via Val to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 456.00 feet; Thence southeasterly along said curve and said southerly line through a central angle of 89A°34'07" an arc length of 712.85 feet;
Thence South 00A°03 '04" West 12.96 feet along said southerly line to the south boundary line of said Parcel Map No. 27225;
Thence North 89A°33'41" East 44.00 feet along said south boundary line to the east line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 30;
Thence South 00A°03 '04" West 296.14 feet along said east line; Thence parallel with the south line of said southwest quarter South 89A°35'36" West 652.62 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL A-1 containing 435,600.00 square feet or 10.00 acres, more or less.

L
F to a IF,S//.5 X
_ 'I] 1T 1! _ '
114'
E=i14' 14'171 -
=715.Fl5'
M
12-548

EXHIBIT "B"

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION

ADOPTING THE MND AND MMRP
(SEE ATTACHED)
7 12-549

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AND APPROVING A MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM REGARDING VIA VAIL APARTMENTS

AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT
PLAN (PDP24-0002)
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Mirage is a charter city and a municipal corporation of the State of California, and recognized as a political subdivision of the State of California for certain purpose; and
WHEREAS, the "Proposed Project" is a Preliminary Development Plan for an affordable housing development — Via Vail Apartments — on approximately ten acres located on the southern side of Vial Vai, between Monterey Avenue and Key large Avenue, having Assessors Parcel Number 685-090-017 (the "Subject Property"), consisting of fifteen (15) two-story apartment building for a total of 236 dwelling units, 100 units of which will be one -bedroom apartments, 62 units of which will be two -bedroom apartments, and 74 units will be three -bedroom apartments, all of which, with the exception of managers' units, are designates for affordable housing, with a density capacity of approximately 24 dwelling units per acre; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2024, the Rancho Mirage Planning Commission adopted Resolution [TO BE INSERTED], incorporated herein by this reference, recommending, in part, the City Council approve and adopt this Resolution, adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") based upon its determination that there is no substantial evidence in the whole record before it that the Proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment that has not been mitigated to a level of less than significant, and that the MND reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis of the Proposed Project and its potential impacts on the environment consistent with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding the Proposed Project, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit "A".

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS
That the foregoing Recitals and attached Exhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.
1 12-550

SECTION 2. EVIDENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
That the City Council has considered all of the evidence ("Evidence") submitted into the administrative record ("Administrative Record") for the Proposed Project, including, but not limited to, the following, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference:
(a) Rancho Mirage Municipal Code;
(b) Rancho Mirage General Plan and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code and all relevant provisions contained therein; (c) Preliminary Development Plan PDP24-0002
(d) Initial Study, Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0005; (e) Notice of Intent to adopt MND;
(f) MND and MMRP (SCH#2024060305);
(g) Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing scheduled for June 27, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, located at City Hall at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California;
(h) Planning Commission Staff Report, attachments and Staff presentation for the Proposed Project, and all public documents, records and references related thereto submitted or provided at or prior to the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Public Hearing;
(i) Testimony and/or comments from Developer and its representatives submitted or provided at, or prior to, the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Public Hearing; and
(j) Testimony and/or comments from all persons that were provided in written format or correspondence, at, or prior to, the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Public Hearing.
(k) Notice of City Council Public Hearing scheduled for [TO BE INSERTED], 2024, at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, located at City Hall at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California;
(I) City Council Staff Report, attachments and Staff presentation for the Proposed Project, and all public documents, records and references related thereto submitted or provided at or prior to the [TO BE INSERTED], 2024, City Council Public Hearing;
(m) Testimony and/or comments from Developer and its representatives submitted or provided at, or prior to, the [TO BE INSERTED], 2024, City Council Public Hearing; and
(n) Testimony and/or comments from all persons that were provided in written format or correspondence, at, or prior to, the [TO BE INSTERTED], 2024, City Council Public Hearing.

City Council acknowledges, accepts, and approves, and makes the following Findings and Determinations:
(a) That the City has independently reviewed, analyzed, and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan, and the whole record before it (including, the Initial Study and comments received) and, based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby finds that all environmental impacts of the Proposed Project, with mitigation measures, are below a level of significance and there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment.
(b) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan have been completed in compliance with CEQA and CEQA Guidelines. (c) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan represent the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission and City Council as lead agency for the Proposed Project. (d) That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan are adequate to serve as the required CEQA environmental documentation for the Proposed Project.

SECTION 4. ADOPT THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM AND APPROVAL OF MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
That based on the Findings and Determinations set forth herein and the substantial evidence included in the Recitals, Exhibits and Evidence contained in Administrative Record, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including the findings set forth therein which support a determination that all potentially significant environmental impacts from implementation of the Proposed Project have been identified and, with the implementation of the mitigation measures defined and set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, will be mitigated to a less -than -significant level.

SECTION 5. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
That the City Council authorizes and directs the Planning Division to prepare, execute, and file a Notice of Determination in accordance with Public Resource Code Section 21152.

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. 3 12-552

SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY
That if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of Resolution or any portion of the Administrative Record for the Proposed Project be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 8. CERTIFICATION.

That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law.

SECTION 9. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.

That all provisions of any resolution in effect prior to the effective date of this Resolution as adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution, are hereby repealed.
4 12-553

PASSED AND ADOPTED on this day of , 2024.

Steve Downs, Mayor
ATTEST:

Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Colin Kirkpatrick, City Attorney
5 12-554

EXHIBIT "A"

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION &

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
(EA24-0005)
[TO BE ATTACHED]
6 12-555

EXHIBIT "C"

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION APPROVING
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN PDP24-0002
(SEE ATTACHED)
8 12-556

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT
PLAN (PDP24-0002)
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Mirage is a charter city and a municipal corporation of the State of California, and recognized as a political subdivision of State of California for certain purpose; and
WHEREAS, Pacific West Communities, Inc. ("Pacific") and the Housing Authority of Rancho Mirage (the "Housing Authority") entered into an agreement entitled Affordable Housing Disposition and Development Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2023, for the disposition of Housing Authority Property to Pacific, upon satisfaction of various terms ad conditions, including, but not limited to, obtaining all project entitlements from the City; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2024, the Rancho Mirage Planning Commission adopted Resolution [TO BE INSERTED], incorporated herein by this reference, recommending, in part, the City Council approve and adopt this Resolution, approving Preliminary Development Plan PDP24-0002 (the "Preliminary Development Plan", and sometimes referred to herein as the "Proposed Project"); and
WHEREAS, the "Proposed Project" is a Preliminary Development Plan for an affordable housing development — Via Vail Apartments — on approximately ten acres located on the southern side of Vial Vail, between Monterey Avenue and Key large Avenue, having Assessors Parcel Number 685-090-017 (the "Subject Property"), consisting of fifteen (15) two-story apartment building for a total of 236 dwelling units, 100 units of which will be one -bedroom apartments, 62 units of which will be two -bedroom apartments, and 74 units will be three -bedroom apartments, all of which, with the exception of managers' units, are designates for affordable housing, with a density capacity of approximately 24 dwelling units per acre; and WHEREAS, on [TO BE INSERTED], at a duly noticed meeting of the City Council, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2024 -[TO BE INSERTED] adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS
That the foregoing Recitals and attached Exhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

SECTION 2. EVIDENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
1 12-557

That the City Council has considered all of the evidence("Evidence") submitted into the administrative record ("Administrative Record") for the Proposed Project, including, but not limited to, the following, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference:
(a) Rancho Mirage Municipal Code;
(b) Rancho Mirage General Plan and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code and all relevant provisions contained therein; (c) Preliminary Development Plan PDP24-0002
(d) Initial Study, Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0005; (e) Notice of Intent to adopt MND;
(f) MND and MMRP (SCH#2024060305);
(g) Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing scheduled for June 27, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, located at City Hall at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California;
(h) Planning Commission Staff Report, attachments and Staff presentation for the Proposed Project, and all public documents, records and references related thereto submitted or provided at or prior to the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Public Hearing;
(i) Testimony and/or comments from Developer and its representatives submitted or provided at, or prior to, the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Public Hearing;
(j) Testimony and/or comments from all persons that were provided in written format or correspondence, at, or prior to, the June 27, 2024, Planning Commission Public Hearing;
(k) Notice of City Council Public Hearing scheduled for [TO BE INSERTED], 2024, at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, located at City Hall at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California;
(I) City Council Staff Report, attachments and Staff presentation for the Proposed Project, and all public documents, records and references related thereto submitted or provided at or prior to the [TO BE INSERTED], 2024, City Council Public Hearing;
(m) Testimony and/or comments from Developer and its representatives submitted or provided at, or prior to, the [TO BE INSERTED], 2024, City Council Public Hearing; and
(n) Testimony and/or comments from all persons that were provided in written format or correspondence, at, or prior to, the [TO BE INSTERTED], 2024, City Council Public Hearing.

SECTION 3. FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS
That based on the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record for the Proposed Project, as set forth and described herein, the City Council acknowledges, accepts, and approves, and makes the following Findings and Determinations:
2 12-558

a) The proposed development is:
1) Allowed within the respective zoning district;
2) Generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of title 17(Zoning) that are necessary to carry out the purpose and requirements of the respective zoning district, including prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines; and
3) Consistent with the general plan and specific plan, if applicable; b) The proposed project would produce a comprehensive development incorporating a more enhanced environment and architectural excellence (e.g., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, increased amounts of landscaping and open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking facilities, etc.) than would normally be possible under more standard district development requirements;
c) The design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle access and public services and utilities (e.g., drainage, fire protection, sewers, water, etc.), would ensure that the proposed development would not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and the respective zoning district; d) The design, location, and proposed uses would be compatible with the character of existing development in the surrounding neighborhood;
e) The subject site (Subject Property) is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of development being proposed; and
f) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and there would be no potential significant negative effects upon environmental quality and natural resources that would not be properly mitigated and monitored, unless findings are made in compliance with CEQA.

SECTION 4. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
That based on the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record for the Proposed Project, which includes Preliminary Development Plan, and the Findings and Determinations set forth herein, the City Council hereby approves Preliminary Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY
That if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of Resolution or any portion of the Administrative Record for the Proposed Project be rendered or declared 3 12-559

invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 8. CERTIFICATION
That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law.

SECTION 9. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
That all provisions of any resolution in effect prior to the effective date of this Resolution as adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution, are hereby repealed.
4 12-560

PASSED AND ADOPTED on this day of , 2023.

Steve Downs, Mayor
ATTEST:

Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Colin D. Kirkpatrick, City Attorney
5 12-561

EXHIBIT "A"

PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PDP24-0002
[TO BE ATTACHED]
6 12-562

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
I, Kristie Ramos, Secretary of the City of Rancho Mirage Planning Commission, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2024 -PC -05 was duly adopted by the City of Rancho Mirage Planning Commission at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27t'' day of June 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: Bryant, Chanter, Curran, Grey.

NOES: None.

ABSTAIN: None.

ABSENT: Agostini.

Kristie Ramos
Board Secretary
9 12-563

ATTACHMENT 6
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AND APPROVING A MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM REGARDING VIA VAIL APARTMENTS

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS
That the foregoing Recitals and attached Exhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.
1 12-564

SECTION 4. ADOPT THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM AND APPROVAL OF MITIGATED

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. 3 12-566

SECTION 8. CERTIFICATION.

That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law.

SECTION 9. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.

PASSED AND ADOPTED on this day of , 2024.

Steve Downs, Mayor
ATTEST:

Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Colin Kirkpatrick, City Attorney
5 12-568

EXHIBIT "A"

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION &

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
(EA24-0005)
[TO BE ATTACHED]
6 12-569

ATTACHMENT 7
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS
That the foregoing Recitals and attached Exhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

SECTION 2. EVIDENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
1 12-570

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY
That if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of Resolution or any portion of the Administrative Record for the Proposed Project be rendered or declared 3 12-572

SECTION 8. CERTIFICATION
That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED on this day of , 2023.

Steve Downs, Mayor
ATTEST:

Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Colin D. Kirkpatrick, City Attorney
5 12-574

EXHIBIT "A"

PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PDP24-0002
[TO BE ATTACHED]
6 12-575

ATTACHMENT 8
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING

CITY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRAL IN SUPPORT OF PACIFIC WEST

COMMUNITIES, INC'S DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE CITY

OF RANCHO MIRAGE ON REAL PROPERTY HAVING ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 685-090-017, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL

RELATED ACTIONS NECESSARY TO NEGOTIATE, PREPARE, AND EXECUTE THE

NECESSARY AGREEMENTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO

EFFECTUATE THE SAME AND FINDING THE ACTION EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, on or about August 28, 2023, the City issued a Request for Statement of Qualifications for Multi -Family Affordable Housing Development, with subsequent addenda, seeking qualified, competent, knowledgeable and experienced entities to develop multi -family affordable housing projects on certain real property located in the City of Rancho Mirage; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 34312.3, the Rancho Mirage Housing Authority approved the sale of the "Subject Property", having Assessors Parcel Number 685-090-017, subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Disposition and Development Agreement between the Rancho Mirage Housing Authority and Pacific West Communities, Inc., dated December 21, 2023; and
WHEREAS, Pacific West Communities, Inc. ("Developer") is proposing to develop multi -family affordable housing development, including a minimum of 236 units, with estimated 366 parking spaces, that are affordable to low income households (30% to 80% AMI) with an estimated average of no more than 60% AMI for the restricted units, plus/in addition to two (2) units set aside for property manager, on the Subject Property (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting a deferral of all City Development Impact Fees ("DIFs"), as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, in the amount of $1,797,766.00 (or as may be adjusted by the City) in support of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development of 236 affordable housing units will provide needed housing opportunities to low income households in the City of Rancho Mirage; and
WHEREAS, the City finds the deferral of the DIFs will assist the Project, serves a public purpose, and provides a public benefit to the City of Rancho Mirage; and WHEREAS, the Project will satisfy a portion of the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) State -imposed requirements; and
1 12-576

WHEREAS, if the Developer secures the necessary financing from non -City funding sources, such as State and/or Federal Tax Credit Programs, to make the Project feasible, then a City DIF Fee Deferral Loan Agreement will be prepared and executed with at minimum the following terms: the term of the DIF Fee Deferral Loan ("Loan") shall be for a 55 year period commencing on the issuance of the Certificates of Occupancy for the Project; the Loan shall bear simple interest at an annual rate of 3%; the Loan shall be paid from the Project's residual cash flow; the Loan shall be secured by a Deed of Trust and Promissory Note; the Loan Agreement will include the terms of a leasing - priority program that prioritizes current Rancho Mirage residents in a manner that is consistent with fair housing or other applicable laws.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS AND INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE.

That the recitals set forth above are true and correct and any and all documents referenced herein are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. APPROVE DIF DEFERRAL.

That the City Council hereby approves deferring City DIFs in an amount not to exceed $1,797,766.00 for the Project to be repaid via a residual cash receipts loan to be issued to the Developer for the purpose of developing the Project.

SECTION 3. CITY MANAGER AUTHORITY.

That the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to take all related actions necessary to negotiate, prepare, and execute the necessary loan agreement and any other documents necessary to effectuate this Resolution, including the DIF deferral as a residual cash receipts loan. Without limiting the generality of the forgoing, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to prepare and execute documents and agreements necessary to provide a DIF deferral to the Project, including but not limited to, preparing and executing a Loan Agreement, Promissory Note, Deed of Trust, and all other documents necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, provided all documents are in a form approved by the City Attorney.

That the City Manager is authorized to establish procedures, policies, and regulations that provides leasing -priority to current Rancho Mirage residents in a manner as described in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and consistent with fair housing and other applicable laws to ensure that this local investment in the Project actually benefits the residents of the City of Rancho Mirage and assists in meeting the City's housing needs and objectives such as providing affordable housing opportunities.

SECTION 4. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.

That the City finds this action exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable 2 12-577

indirect physical change in the environment; the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378; and pursuant to 15061(b)(3), because approval of the action does not have the potential for causing significant effect on the environment, and it can be seen with certainty there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY.

That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 6. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.

That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.

That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

SECTION 8. CERTIFICATION.

That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
3 12-578

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 2024.

CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
Steve Downs, Mayor
ATTEST:

Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Colin Kirkpatrick, City Attorney
4 12-579

EXHIBIT "A"

CITY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO BE DEFERRED
[SEE ATTACHED]
5 12-580

EXHIBIT "A"

CITY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO BE DEFERRED
Development Impact Fees
Cost Estimate
General Government
$188,564.00
Fire Protection
$85,432.00
Transportation
$606,520.00
Park and Recreation
$326,388.00
Library
$217,356.00
Infrastructure Undergrounding
$64,192.00
Total:
$1,488,216.00
Building Fees
Building Fee
$80,000.00
Plan Check
$55,000.00
Fire Department
N/A
SMIP
$4,000.00
License Tax
$120,000.00
General Plan
$2,550.00
Technology
$1,500.00
Mechanical
$8,000.00
Plumbing
$16,500.00
Electrical
$22,000.00
Total:
$309,550.00
Grand Total:
$1,797,766.00
6 12-581

EXHIBIT "B"

ADVERTISING AND LEASING PRIORITY PROGRAM
As a condition of City DIF Deferral Loan, and as will be included in related Loan Agreement, the Developer agrees that it will prioritize its rental recruitment and unit lease actions for current residents of Rancho Mirage. This prioritization shall be accomplished by the Developer providing an advertising and leasing schedule to the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority and Housing Manager for its review and approval within a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days prior to the initiation of rental advertising and leasing efforts. The submitted advertising and leasing schedule shall demonstrate that the initial print, mail or social media advertising regarding availability of rental units shall be conducted first in a manner that informs current residents in Rancho Mirage, and secondarily to residents in the Coachella Valley. These initial focused efforts to inform Rancho Mirage residents of the lease opportunities shall be conducted for a minimum period of sixty (60) days, while the secondary efforts to expand the outreach to reach Coachella Valley residents shall only be conducted following the end of the sixty (60) day initial period, and shall also be conducted for a minimum period of sixty (60) days. Rental application review and applicant screening efforts shall prioritize current City of Rancho Mirage residents first and current Coachella Valley residents second with the understanding that only qualified applicants from the City of Rancho Mirage and the Coachella Valley shall be considered for possible leasing of rental units during the initial 160 days since the start of the concentrated applicant recruitment effort. Qualified applicants from Rancho Mirage who are disabled, senior citizens 62 years of age or older, and those Rancho Mirage residents who currently work in Rancho Mirage will be given even further leasing priority followed by other residents from Rancho Mirage, and then from the Coachella Valley during that initial 160 -day period. At the end of its initial and secondary leasing efforts, the Developer shall provide the City's Housing Authority and Housing Manager with a list of the number of residents from the City of Rancho Mirage and the Coachella Valley that inquired about leasing opportunities (including the number of phone calls, emails or other forms of inquiries each as received by the Developer), the number of applications received, denied, and approved, and the number of tenants who were approved for move -in from Rancho Mirage and the Coachella Valley. The Developer and the City will work cooperatively and modify the priority program if needed prior to or during the advertising and leasing periods to ensure that the implementation of its priority -based advertising and leasing program is compliant with fair housing and other applicable laws.
7 12-582

ATTACHMENT 9
CITY OF RA NC 0 MIRAGE

STAFF REPORT
CONDITION OF APPROVAL #3a HAS BEEN ADDED
TO: Planning Commission DATE: June 27, 2024
FROM: Pilar Lopez, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Via Vail Apartments - Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP24-0002 Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0005
SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2024 -PC -(Next -in -Order), recommending that the City Council take the following actions:
a) Adopt Resolution No. 2024 -(Next -in -Order), approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH#2024060305) for the Proposed Project based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0005. b) Adopt Resolution No. 2024 -(Next -in -Order), approving Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP24-0002.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Aerial

2. Public Hearing Notice

3. Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration

4. Draft Notice of Determination

5. Resolution of the Planning Commission recommending that the City Council approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the Preliminary Development Plan for the Via Vail Apartments.

6. Resolution approving and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH#2024060305) for the Proposed Project based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0005.

7. Resolution approving the proposed Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP24- 0002.

8. PDP24-0002 Exhibit Booklet
Planning Commission Staff Report 1 yEOfEM#

DATE: June 27, 2024
EA24-0005 & PDP24-0002 Page 2 of 34
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

FACTS:

1. Applicant/Property Owner:

2. Purpose of Request:

3. Location:

4. Parcel Size:

5. Existing Land Use:

6. Proposed Land Use:

7. Surrounding Land Use:

8. Environmental Information:

9. Date Staff Deemed
Application Deemed Complete:

PROJECT SUMMARY
Pacific West Communities, Inc.

Consideration of an affordable housing
development, Via Vail Apartments, consisting of
236 units comprised of fifteen (15) two-story
buildings with residential amenities such as a pool,
community room, fitness room, leasing room,
laundry facilities, and a tot lot. The units will be
100% affordable, except for the three manager
units that will remain unrestricted. The proposed
project will have a density capacity of approximately
24 dwelling units/acre. The 10± -acre subject site is
located on the southern side of Via Vail, between
Monterey Avenue and Key Largo Avenue, adjacent
to the Rancho Mirage Dog Park.

South of Via Vail, East of Key Largo Avenue, West
of Monterey Avenue
Assessor's Parcel Number: 685-090-017
10± acres
Residential High -Density (R -H), Affordable Housing
Overlay (AHO)
Residential High -Density (R -H), Affordable Housing
Overlay (AHO)
West: Rancho Mirage Dog Park and vacant lands
(Open Space — Private Park (OS -PP) / Monterey
Specific Plan)
North: Monterey Marketplace Shopping Center
(Community Commercial (C -C) / Monterey
Marketplace Specific Plan)
South: Vacant land (Medium Density Residential
(R -M) / Monterey Marketplace Specific Plan)
East: Vacant land (Community Commercial (C -C) /
Monterey Marketplace Specific Plan)
The recommendation is to adopt a Mitigated
Negative Declaration (SCH#2024060305) based on
Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0005
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Section 15074.

June 10, 2024
The proposed project is an affordable housing development, Via Vail Apartments, consisting of 236 units comprised of fifteen (15) two-story buildings with residential amenities such as a pool, community room, fitness room, leasing room, laundry facilities, and a tot lot. The units will be 100% affordable except for the three manager units that will remain unrestricted. The proposed Planning Commission Staff Report 1 yEO 4'EM#

DATE: June 27, 2024
EA24-0005 & PDP24-0002 Page 3 of 34
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
project will have a density capacity of approximately 24 dwelling units/acre. The 10± -acre subject site is located on the southern side of Via Vail, between Monterey Avenue and Key Largo Avenue, adjacent to the Rancho Mirage Dog Park.

BACKGROUND
As part of the 2021-2029 Housing Element, nine planning areas (Housing Element Inventory Sites A -I) were identified to meet the 1,076 extremely low, very low, low, and moderate -income units required to meet the city's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) allocation.

Housing Element Inventory Site B is the 52± -acre parcel that currently holds the Rancho Mirage Dog Park. The site is split zoned into Open Space -Private Park (OP/PP) and High Density Residential (R -H). The city is processing Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0003, General Plan Zoning Map Amendment Case No. GPZMA24-0002, and Specific Plan Amendment Case No. SP24-0001 to reconfigure the existing land use which is currently split with approximately 25.21 acres of High Density Residential (R -H) on the south end and approximately 28.55 of Public Park (OS -PP) on the north end of the project site. The land use designations will be reconfigured so that the High Density Residential (R -H) is on the eastern side of the property and the Public Park (OS -PP) on the western side. An amendment to the Monterey Specific Plan is also proposed to reflect these changes on the land use map.

The subject site was previously identified as Parcel A-1 of Housing Element Inventory Site B during the recordation process with the County of Riverside. The larger property has been subdivided, with former Parcel A-1 now identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 685-090-017.

On August 28, 2023, the Rancho Mirage Housing Authority released a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") for the development of at least 200 multi -family affordable housing units on the subject site. The subject site was selected for the RFQ due to its California Tax Credit Allocation Committee ("CTCAC") and California Department of Housing and Community Development's ("HCD") high resource designation, which makes it competitive in terms of scoring for critical State funding. While reviewing Request for Qualification submittals, staff was made aware that the 2024 CTCAC/HOC Draft Opportunity Maps were made available in late October and that the designation for various sites throughout the City would be changed from high resource to moderate resource designations. To help ensure the development of affordable housing, city staff determined to develop Housing Element Inventory Site B with the entire 25 acres would grant the greatest opportunity for the development of affordable housing and entered into 3 disposition and development agreements ("DDA") on Site B to lock in the high resource designation. On December 21, 2023, the Housing Authority Board authorized the disposition and development agreements with accompanying deeds to establish site control for the development of affordable housing on Housing Element Inventory Site B with Pacific West Communities Inc., National Community Renaissance of California and USA Properties Fund, and Blieu LLC, for consideration by the Housing Authority Board. Pacific West Communities Inc. was selected for the subject site.

The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) publishes annual tables of official federal and state income limits that set maximum incomes for eligibility to live in assisted Planning Commission Staff Report
1T-Str

DATE: June 27, 2024
EA24-0005 & PDP24-0002 Page 4 of 34
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
housing, and maximum rents and housing costs that may be charged to eligible residents. Most federal and state housing assistance programs are usually based on their income.

State statutory limits are based on federal limits set and periodically revised by the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. HUD's limits are based on surveys of local area median income (AMI).

The commonly used income categories are approximately as follows, subject to variations for household size and other factors:
• Acutely low income: 0-15% of AMI
• Extremely low income: 15-30% of AMI
• Very low income: 30% to 50% of AMI
• Lower income: 50% to 80% of AMI
• The term may also be used to mean 0% to 80% of AMI
• Moderate income: 80% to 120% of AMI
Leasing for the proposed project will be subject to the above HUD limits for 233 units of the proposed 236 units (excludes 3 manager units).

Subject Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning, and Land Uses The Project site is located on the southern side of Via Vail, between Monterey Avenue and Key Largo Avenue in Rancho Mirage. The site consists of a 10± -acre -sized parcel, shaped in an irregular configuration and consisting of undeveloped desert lands with spare vegetation. In alignment with the intended land use, the project is proposing the development of a multifamily affordable housing project.

The site is designated for Residential High Density (R -H) with an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO). The R -H zoning district allows for the development of high density single- and multi- family residential homes including apartments that encompass traits of a planned community.

Similar residential developments such as affordable housing and senior living are allowed and preferred in an R -H zone.

General Plan and Zoning Designation
Land Use
Project Site
Residential High -Density (R -H) /
Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO)
Vacant land
North
Community Commercial (C -C) / Monterey
Specific Plan
Via Vail (proposed improvement and
extension, accessible from Key Largo
Avenue), vacant land, and Monterey
Marketplace Shopping Center
East
Community Commercial (C -C) / Monterey
Specific Plan
Vacant land
South
Medium Density Residential (R -M) /
Monterey Specific Plan
Vacant land
West
Open Space — Private Park (OS -PP) /
Monterey Specific Plan
Vacant land
Planning Commission Staff Report
1 �GEg)6 6EM#

DATE: June 27, 2024
EA24-0005 & PDP24-0002 Page 5 of 34
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

ANALYSIS
Review Authority (Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Section 17.34.010) Preliminary Development Plan applications require City Council approval. Therefore, the Planning Commission's role in this matter is to forward a recommendation to the City Council for the discretionary entitlement described in this staff report.

Development Plan Permit (Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Chapter 17.42) The purpose of the Development Plan Permit is to establish consistency with the General Plan and protect the integrity and character of the residential and commercial areas of the city. The process ensures that new development yields a pleasant living environment and attracts the interest of residents and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design.

Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) (Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Section 17.14.030 (E)) As per the AHO, density is allowed to up to 28 units per acre and affordable housing projects are subject to density bonuses and incentives as outlined by the Rancho Municipal Code Section

17.22.020. The AHO provides for development standards to change if the proposed modifications increase development efficiency and are considered appropriate or necessary by the City Council. The project is compatible and consistent with the R -H land use and zoning designation under the AHO overlay. All development standards and regulations proposed are compatible under the Affordable Housing Overlay. The applicant is proposing the following deviations of the front setback for one building, maximum height of 30 feet/two-stories, parking requirements, and dwelling unit sizes. The below table summarizes the development standards for the R -H Zoning District and the proposed standards for the proposed project in accordance with the AHO.

Development Standards Code Analysis
Category
RMMC
Proposed Project
Zoning
Residential High Density (R -H),
Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO)
Residential High Density (R -H),
Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO)
Lot Area
8,000 square feet - minimum
439,270 square feet / 10 acres
Lot Coverage
35%
38%
Maximum Building
Height/No. of
Stories
20 feet
1 -story
30 feet
2 -stories
Residential Density
AHO allows up to 28 du/ac

23.6 DU/AC
Setbacks
Front: 20 feet
Side: 10 feet
Street side: 15 feet
Rear: 20 feet
Front: 7 feet to 20 feet
Side: 20 feet
Rear: 10 feet
Open Space
300 square feet private outdoor
living space per unit
62-100 square feet of private open space
provided per unit.

Off -Street Parking
Standards
1 br: 1 covered for each unit
and 1 off-street guest space
for every 2 units
1 stall per 1 br
2 stalls per 2 br, 3 br
Planning Commission Staff Report
1T-Str"

DATE: June 27, 2024
EA24-0005 & PDP24-0002

Page 6 of 34 ends

Rancho Mirage City CouncilJuly 18, 2024

Rancho Mirage City Council
July 18, 2024