CC04 — Rancho Mirage City Council, October 3, 2024 (part 3 of 3)

3. A larger than the standard 315' by 315' site (final site dimensions will be determined once evaluation is completed), pre -approved by IID, will be required.

Final site dimensions will be determined once evaluation is completed. Additional requirements include but are not limited to, grading, fencing, permits, zoning change, environmental compliance documentation, landscaping (if required by the City), and all rights of way and easements for the substation, and access rights for both ingress and egress, as well as for transmission and distribution power line facilities, all of which are required to be provided to IID before starting the substation implementation.

4. The applicant will be required to extend one (1) distribution feeder (conduit and cable) from the new substation to the proposed project with a high level cost of $0.7 Million. This cost is in addition to the cost share for the substation. In addition, the applicant will be required to install the necessary conduit/vault systems following the Permanent Plan of Service as well as distribution getaways conduit systems from the required substation.

5. IID will not begin any engineering studies to provide electrical service to the project until the applicant submits a customer project application (available for download at http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=12923 and detailed loading information, panel sizes, project schedule and estimated in-service date. Applicant shall bear all costs associated with additional facilities deemed necessary to provide electrical service to the project, including but not limited to distribution feeder/backbone extensions, distribution overhead and/or underground line extensions, as well as any other related upgrades and applicable permits, zoning changes, landscaping (if required by the County) and rights -of -way and easements.

6. It is important to note that a transmission -level power flow analysis (the cost of which is to be borne by the applicant) will be required to properly assess the impacts caused by this project once a customer project application and loading calculations are received. This detail information will allow IID to perform an accurate assessment and provide a full report of any potential impacts and mitigation measures. The conditions of service could change as a result of additional studies.

7. The applicant should be advised that pursuant to IID process, the standard time frame for the implementation of a new substation (engineering, equipment procurement and construction) requires an average of 36 months. As a result, the applicant should adjust the project's in-service dates accordingly.

8. Based upon the above, by a date no later than June 4, 2025, the applicant must provide the following documentation to IID: 1) Evidence of issuance of all local authorizations required to initiate construction, 2) Application for the installation of 4-496

Ben Torres
June 4, 2024

Page 3 ends

underground infrastructure system and payment of accompanying fees and 3) Application for service and payment of accompanying fees. Absent receipt of such evidence and documentation by the referenced date, a new study will be required including a revised Plan of Service.

9. Line extensions to serve the project will be made in accordance with 110 Regulations:

No. 2 ( http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2540) , No. 13 ( http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2553) , No. 15 ( http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2555)

10. For additional information regarding electrical service for the project, the applicant should be advised to contact the IID Energy - La Quinta Division Customer Operations, 81-600 Avenue 58 La Quinta, CA 92253, at (760) 398-5841 and speak with the project development planner assigned to the area.

11.It is important to note that IID's policy is to extend its electrical facilities only to those project that have obtained the approval of a city or county planning commission and such other governmental authority or decision -making body having jurisdiction over said developments.

12. The applicant will be required to provide rights of ways and easements for any proposed power line extensions and/or any other infrastructure needed to serve the project as well as the necessary access to allow for continued operation and maintenance of any IID facilities located on adjoining properties.

13. The project proponent will be required to provide and bear all costs associated with acquisition of rights of way, easements, and infrastructure relocations deemed necessary to accommodate street or road improvements imposed by the municipality.

14. Public utility easements over all private public roads and additional ten (10) feet in width on both side of the private and public roads shall be dedicated to IID for the construction, operation, and maintenance of its electrical infrastructure.

15.Any construction or operation on IID property or within its existing and proposed right of way or easements including but not limited to: surface improvements such as proposed new streets, driveways, parking lots, landscape; and all water, sewer, storm water, or any other above ground or underground utilities; will require an encroachment permit, or encroachment agreement (depending on the circumstances). A copy of the IID encroachment permit application and instructions for its completion are available at https://www.iid.com/about-iid/department- directory/real-estate. The IID Real Estate Section should be contacted at (760) 4-497

Ben Torres
June 4, 2024

Page 4 ends

339-9239 for additional information regarding encroachment permits or agreements.

16.Any new, relocated, modified or reconstructed IID facilities required for and by the project (which can include but is not limited to electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and/or distribution lines, ancillary facilities associated with the conveyance of energy service; the acquisition and dedication of real property, rights of way and/or easements for the siting and construction of electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and/or distribution lines and ancillary facilities associated with the conveyance of energy service, etc.) need to be included as part of the project's California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and/or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA documentation, environmental impact analysis and mitigation. Failure to do so will result in postponement of any construction and/or modification of IID facilities until such time as the environmental documentation is amended and environmental impacts are fully mitigated. Any mitigation necessary as a result of the construction, relocation and/or upgrade of IID facilities is the responsibility of the project proponent.

17. Dividing a project into two or more pieces and evaluating each piece in a separate environmental document (Piecemealing or Segmenting), rather than evaluating the whole of the project in one environmental document, is explicitly forbidden by CEQA, because dividing a project into a number of pieces would allow a Lead Agency to minimize the apparent environmental impacts of a project by evaluating individual pieces separately, each of which may have a less -than -significant impact on the environment, but which together may result in a significant impact.

Segmenting a project may also hinder developing comprehensive mitigation strategies. In general, if an activity or facility is necessary for the operation of a project, or necessary to achieve the project objectives, or a reasonably foreseeable consequence of approving the project, then it should be considered an integral project component that should be analyzed within the environmental analysis. The project description should include all project components, including those that will have to be approved by responsible agencies. The State CEQA Guidelines define a project under CEQA as "the whole of the action" that may result either directly or indirectly in physical changes to the environment. This broad definition is intended to provide the maximum protection of the environment.

CEQA case law has established general principles on project segmentation for different project types. For a project requiring construction of offsite infrastructure, the offsite infrastructure must be included in the project description. San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App. 4th 713.

18. When the project goes through the CEQA compliance process, it is important to bear in mind that to address the project impacts to the electrical utility (i.e., the IID electrical grid), considered under the environmental factor "Utilities and Services" of the Environmental Checklist/Intial Study, to determine if the project would 4-498

Ben Torres
June 4, 2024

Page 5 ends

require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects; a circuit study/distribution impact study, facility study, and/or system impact study must be performed. The impact of the developmentof the proposed 17 -lot gated residential community on the electrical utilty was not was not evaluated.

19. Applicant should be advised that landscaping can be dangerous if items are planted too close to IID's electrical equipment. In the event of an outage, or equipment failure, it is vital that IID personnel have immediate and safe access to its equipment to make the needed repairs. For public safety, and that of the electrical workers, it is important to adhere to standards that limit landscaping around electrical facilities. IID landscaping guidelines are available at https://www.iid.com/energy/vegetation-management .

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 482-3609 or at dvargas©iid.com. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter.

Resp etfully,
Donald Vargas
Compliance Administrator II
Jamie Asbury — General Manager
Mike Pacheco — Manager, Water Dept.

Matthew H Smelser — Manager, Energy Dept.

Paul Rodriguez — Deputy Mgr. Energy Dept.

Guillermo Barraza — Mgr. of Distribution Srvcs. & Maint. Oprtns., Energy Dept.

Geoff Holbrook - General Counsel
Michael P. Kemp — Superintendent General, Fleet Services and Reg. & Environ. Compliance Laura Cervantes. — Supervisor, Real Estate
4-499

LODGETTJAYLOSISNVIRONMENT LANNING
Planning • Environmental Analysis • Economics • Mapping • GIS Date: July 25, 2024
To: Ben Torres, Planning Manager, City of Rancho Mirage From: Marc Blodgett, Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning Subject: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS — Imperial Irrigation District (IID) NOI To Adopt and MND for the 17 Lot Subdivision Project in Rancho Mirage, CA; TTM 38041 Comments and Response to Comments
Comment 1:

Response 1:

Comment 2:

Response 2:

Comment 3:

Response 3:

On May 3, 2024, the Imperial Irrigation District received from the City Of Rancho Mirage Planning Division, a request for agency comments on the Notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 17 Lot Subdivision project in Rancho Mirage, California; Tentative Tract Map No. 38041. The project proposes to subdivide the 8.42- acre project site, located on the east side of Via Josefina at the terminus of Victory Drive (APNs 685-080-031, -010 & 685-030-006) in Rancho Mirage, CA; into a 17 -lot gated residential community with lots ranging in size from approximately 12,511 sq. ft. to 22,323 sq. ft.

Based on the preliminary information provided to the IID, to accommodate the power load to service the proposed project will require the site acquisition, design, construction and commissioning of a new substation with two (2) 50 MVA 92/13.2 kV transformer banks in addition to distribution getaways and transmission line extensions. The required substation is currently anticipated to be constructed under a cost -share agreement concept on a per KVA basis, with a high-level cost estimate of $28 Million, based on 2024 IID rates. As a result, the project is not likely [to be] solely responsible for the entire cost, but the plan of service for the project is contingent upon the implementation of the substation and related upgrades, and the project will be required to contribute to the cost share arrangement. To the extent the cost share arrangement is not finalized, the project may be required to facilitate construction of the substation.

The comment is noted for the record. No further response is required.

The extension of two (2) 92 kV transmission lines with an in and out configuration is also needed to serve the substation from IID's existing 92 kV transmission system in the project vicinity.

The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference.

A larger than the standard 315' by 315' site (final site dimensions will be determined once evaluation is completed), pre -approved by IID, will be required. Final site dimensions will be determined once evaluation is completed. Additional requirements include but are not limited to, grading, fencing, permits, zoning change, environmental compliance documentation, landscaping (if required by the City), and all rights of way and easements for the substation, and access rights for both ingress and egress, as well as for transmission and distribution power line facilities, all of which are required to be provided to IID before starting the substation implementation.

The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference. The project's implementation would conform to all pertinent City of Rancho Mirage requirements.
2211 S. HACIENDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 107 • HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA 91745 PHONE 626-336-0033 • CELLULAR 562-556-4542 • E-MAIL [email protected] 4-5 0

LODGE TI1:jAYLOSISLJNVIRONMENTAI! PLANNING
Comment 4:

The applicant will be required to extend one (1) distribution feeder (conduit and cable) from the new substation to the proposed project with a high level cost of $0.7 Million. This cost is in addition to the cost share for the substation. In addition, the applicant will be required to install the necessary conduit/vault systems following the Permanent Plan of Service as well as distribution getaways conduit systems from the required substation.

Response 4: The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference.

Comment 5: IID will not begin any engineering studies to provide electrical service to the project until the applicant submits a customer project application (available for download at http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=12923 and detailed loading information, panel sizes, project schedule and estimated in-service date. Applicant shall bear all costs associated with additional facilities deemed necessary to provide electrical service to the project, including but not limited to distribution feeder/backbone extensions, distribution overhead and/or underground line extensions, as well as any other related upgrades and applicable permits, zoning changes, landscaping (if required by the County) and rights -of -way and easements.

Response 5: The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference.

Comment 6: It is important to note that a transmission -level power flow analysis (the cost of which is to be borne by the applicant) will be required to properly assess the impacts caused by this project once a customer project application and loading calculations are received. This detail information will allow HD to perform an accurate assessment and provide a full report of any potential impacts and mitigation measures. The conditions of service could change as a result of additional studies.

Response 6: The comment is noted for the record. The Applicant would comply with the aforementioned IID requirements during the appropriated phases of the project's implementation.

Comment 7: The applicant should be advised that pursuant to IID process, the standard time frame for the implementation of a new substation (engineering, equipment procurement and construction) requires an average of 36 months. As a result, the applicant should adjust the project's in-service dates accordingly.

Response 7: The comment is noted for the record.

Comment 8: Based upon the above, by a date no later than June 4, 2025, the applicant must provide the following documentation to IID: 1) Evidence of issuance of all local authorizations required to initiate construction, 2) Application for the installation of underground infrastructure system and payment of accompanying fees and 3) Application for service and payment of accompanying fees. Absent receipt of such evidence and documentation by the referenced date, a new study will be required including a revised Plan of Service.

Response 8:

The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference. The Applicant would comply with the aforementioned IID requirements during the appropriated phases of the project's implementation.

Comment 9: Line extensions to serve the project will be made in accordance with IID Regulations:

No. 2 ( http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2540) , PAGE 2
4-501

LODGE YLOSIS RONMENT LANNING
No. 13 ( http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2553) , No. 15 ( http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2555)
Response 9: The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference.

Comment 10: For additional information regarding electrical service for the project, the applicant should be advised to contact the IID Energy - La Quinta Division Customer Operations, 81-600 Avenue 58 La Quinta, CA 92253, at (760) 398-5841 and speak with the project development planner assigned to the area.

Response 10: The comment is noted for the record. No further response is required.

Comment 11: It is important to note that IlD's policy is to extend its electrical facilities only to those project that have obtained the approval of a city or county planning commission and such other governmental authority or decision -making body having jurisdiction over said developments.

Response 11: The comment is noted for the record. The proposed project required a number of discretionary approvals that will be considered by the City of Rancho Mirage Planning Commission.

Comment 12: The applicant will be required to provide rights of ways and easements for any proposed power line extensions and/or any other infrastructure needed to serve the project as well as the necessary access to allow for continued operation and maintenance of any IID facilities located on adjoining properties.

Response 12: The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference.

Comment 13: The project proponent will be required to provide and bear all costs associated with acquisition of rights of way, easements, and infrastructure relocations deemed necessary to accommodate street or road improvements imposed by the municipality.

Response 13: The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference.

Comment 14: Public utility easements over all private public roads and additional ten (10) feet in width on both side of the private and public roads shall be dedicated to IID for the construction, operation, and maintenance of its electrical infrastructure.

Response 14: The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference.

Comment 15: Any construction or operation on IID property or within its existing and proposed right of way or easements including but not limited to: surface improvements such as proposed new streets, driveways, parking lots, landscape; and all water, sewer, storm water, or any other above ground or underground utilities; will require an encroachment permit, or encroachment agreement (depending on the circumstances). A copy of the IID encroachment permit application and instructions for its completion are available at https://www.iid.com/about-iid/department- directory/real-estate. The IID Real Estate Section should be contacted at (760) 339-9239 for additional information regarding encroachment permits or agreements.

PAGE 3

LODGE TI1:jAYLOSISLJNVIRONMENTAI! PLANNING
Response 15: The comment is noted for the record. This information has been incorporated into the IS/MND by reference.

Comment 16: Any new, relocated, modified or reconstructed IID facilities required for and by the project (which can include but is not limited to electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and/or distribution lines, ancillary facilities associated with the conveyance of energy service; the acquisition and dedication of real property, rights of way and/or easements for the siting and construction of electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and/or distribution lines and ancillary facilities associated with the conveyance of energy service, etc.) need to be included as part of the project's California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and/or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA documentation, environmental impact analysis and mitigation. Failure to do so will result in postponement of any construction and/or modification of IID facilities until such time as the environmental documentation is amended and environmental impacts are fully mitigated.

Any mitigation necessary as a result of the construction, relocation and/or upgrade of IID facilities is the responsibility of the project proponent.

Response 16: The analysis of electrical energy consumption was included in Section 6. Pertinent information included in the IS/MND is shown in italics and is provided below and on the following pages :

The proposed project would involve the subdivision of a seventeen lot residential development within the 8.42 acre project site. The proposed development would connect to a new 8 inch sewer line on the internal roadways and a new 12 inch sewer line on Via Josefina. The relatively level site is approximately 272 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) and contains no slope. The vegetation community present on site supports a sparse desert dune habitat encompassing mainly smaller native plants and some non-native grasses. The project site is comprised of 3 vacant, undeveloped parcels. These parcels are subject to the Section 30 Design Guidelines and Master Circulation Plan. The Zoning designation for the westernmost parcel is Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2). A 1.5 -acre portion of this parcel would require a General Plan Zoning Map Amendment (GPZMA) to change the current zoning from Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) to Medium Density Residential (R -M). The remaining two parcels are designated as Medium Density Residential (R -M).

During construction, the proposed project would consume energy related to the use of fuels used to power construction vehicles and other equipment that would be used during site clearing, grading, and construction. Fuel use associated with construction vehicle trips generated by the proposed project was also estimated; trips include construction worker trips, haul truck trips for material transport, and vendor trips for construction material deliveries.

Energy consumed during construction would be temporary in nature and would not present a significant demand on energy resources. The proposed project would be constructed pursuant to the 2022 energy standards of Title 24. Construction equipment greater than 150 horsepower (hp), is also required to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)/California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 emissions standards and shall ensure that all construction equipment is tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. For engines from 175 to less than 750 hp, the Tier 4 Final regulations took effect on January 1, 2014. For engines from 49 to less than 75 hp, it took effect on January 1, 2013. Finally, for engines from 75 to less than 175 hp, the Tier 4 regulations took effect on January 1, 2015. In addition, the project would be required to comply with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Sections 2449(d)(3) and 2485, which minimizes the idling time of construction equipment either by shutting it off when not in use or by reducing the time of idling to no more than five minutes. These emissions standards require highly efficient combustion systems that maximize fuel efficiency and reduce unnecessary fuel consumption. Therefore, no significant impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction are anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.
4-503

LODGE TI1:jAYLOSISLJNVIRONMENTAI! PLANNING
The increased demand is expected to be sufficiently served by the existing Imperial Irrigation District (IID) facilities. As shown in Table 5, the proposed project is anticipated to consume 262 kWh daily. The proposed project is located within the service area of the Southern California Gas Company. The project site currently has no demand for natural gas. Therefore, the development of the proposed project would create a permanent increase in the demand for natural gas. As shown in Table 5, the proposed project is anticipated to consume 3,776.8 cubic feet of natural gas on a daily basis.

Table 5 Proposed Project's Energy Consumption
Energy Type
Consumption Rate
Daily Energy Consumption
Electrical Consumption
Natural Gas Consumption
9,339.24 kWh/unit/year
35, 564.29 BTU/unit/year
434.98 kWh/Day
1656.42 BTU/Day
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. California Emissions Estimator Model.

Version 2022.1.1.21 (Used in Appendix A)
According to the CaIEEMod air quality emissions model, the 17 units would consume 158,767 kWh of electricity on an annual basis. According to the same model, the 17 units would consume 604,593 BTUs on an annual basis. The proposed project's energy consumption would be related to energy that would be used for lighting and other household activities.

Lighting would be required to follow the City's Outdoor Lighting Policy, which includes the use of energy efficient lighting. For these reasons, the project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy. The project applicant would be required to work with the local electrical utility company to identify existing and future strategies that would be effective in reducing energy consumption. As a result, the impact would be less than significant.

Comment 17: Dividing a project into two or more pieces and evaluating each piece in a separate environmental document (Piecemealing or Segmenting), rather than evaluating the whole of the project in one environmental document, is explicitly forbidden by CEQA, because dividing a project into a number of pieces would allow a Lead Agency to minimize the apparent environmental impacts of a project by evaluating individual pieces separately, each of which may have a less -than - significant impact on the environment, but which together may result in a significant impact.

Response 17: The comment is noted for the record. The project, in its entirety, was evaluated in the IS/MND.

As a result, no piecemealing has occurred.

PAGE 5

LODGE TI1:jAYLOSISLJNVIRONMENTAI! PLANNING
Comment 18: When the project goes through the CEQA compliance process, it is important to bear in mind that to address the project impacts to the electrical utility (i.e., the IID electrical grid), considered under the environmental factor "Utilities and Services" of the Environmental Checklist/Initial Study, to determine if the project would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects; a circuit study/distribution impact study, facility study, and/or system impact study must be performed. The impact of the development of the proposed 17 -lot gated residential community on the electrical utility was not was not evaluated.

Response 18: Please refer to Response 17.

Comment 19: Applicant should be advised that landscaping can be dangerous if items are planted too close to IID's electrical equipment. In the event of an outage, or equipment failure, it is vital that IID personnel have immediate and safe access to its equipment to make the needed repairs. For public safety, and that of the electrical workers, it is important to adhere to standards that limit landscaping around electrical facilities. IID landscaping guidelines are available at https://www.iid.com/energy/vegetation-management . Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 482-3609 or at [email protected]. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter.

Response 19: The comment is noted for the record. The Applicant and the future property owners will comply with both City and IID landscaping Maintenance requirements.

Information to be incorporated by Reference
The following comments submitted by the IID are incorporated into the record by reference. This information does not change the conclusions of the IS/MND nor do they require any further analysis and/or mitigation.

1. Based on the preliminary information provided to the IID, to accommodate the power load to service the proposed project will require the site acquisition, design, construction and commissioning of a new substation with two (2) 50 MVA 92/13.2 kV transformer banks in addition to distribution getaways and transmission line extensions. The required substation is currently anticipated to be constructed under a cost -share agreement concept on a per KVA basis, with a high-level cost estimate of $28 Million, based on 2024 IID rates. As a result, the project is not likely [to be] solely responsible for the entire cost, but the plan of service for the project is contingent upon the implementation of the substation and related upgrades, and the project will be required to contribute to the cost share arrangement. To the extent the cost share arrangement is not finalized, the project may be required to facilitate construction of the substation. (Comment 1)

2. The extension of two (2) 92 kV transmission lines with an in and out configuration is also needed to serve the substation from IID's existing 92 kV transmission system in the project vicinity. (Comment 2)

3. A larger than the standard 315' by 315' site (final site dimensions will be determined once evaluation is completed), pre -approved by IID, will be required. Final site dimensions will be determined once evaluation is completed. Additional requirements include but are not limited to, grading, fencing, permits, zoning change, environmental compliance documentation, landscaping (if required by the City), and all rights of way and easements for the substation, and access rights for both ingress and egress, as well as for transmission and distribution power line facilities, all of which are required to be provided to IID before starting the substation implementation. (Comment 3) PAGE 6
4-505

LODGE TI1:jAYLOSISLJNVIRONMENTAI! PLANNING

7. Based upon the above, by a date no later than June 4, 2025, the applicant must provide the following documentation to IID: 1) Evidence of issuance of all local authorizations required to initiate construction, 2) Application for the installation of underground infrastructure system and payment of accompanying fees and 3) Application for service and payment of accompanying fees. Absent receipt of such evidence and documentation by the referenced date, a new study will be required including a revised Plan of Service. (Comment 8)

8. Line extensions to serve the project will be made in accordance with IID Regulations: No. 2, No. 13), and No. 15. (Comment 9).

9. The applicant will be required to provide rights of ways and easements for any proposed power line extensions and/or any other infrastructure needed to serve the project as well as the necessary access to allow for continued operation and maintenance of any IID facilities located on adjoining properties. (Comment 12)

10. The project proponent will be required to provide and bear all costs associated with acquisition of rights of way, easements, and infrastructure relocations deemed necessary to accommodate street or road improvements imposed by the municipality. (Comment 13)

11. Public utility easements over all private public roads and additional ten (10) feet in width on both side of the private and public roads shall be dedicated to IID for the construction, operation, and maintenance of its electrical infrastructure. (Comment 14)

12. Any construction or operation on IID property or within its existing and proposed right of way or easements including but not limited to: surface improvements such as proposed new streets, driveways, parking lots, landscape; and all water, sewer, storm water, or any other above ground or underground utilities; will require an encroachment permit, or encroachment agreement (depending on the circumstances). A copy of the IID encroachment permit application and instructions for its completion are available at https://www.iid.com/about-iid/department-

LODGE TI1:jAYLOSISLJNVIRONMENTAI! PLANNING
directory/real-estate. The IID Real Estate Section should be contacted at (760) 339-9239 for additional information regarding encroachment permits or agreements. (Comment 15)

12. Applicant should be advised that landscaping can be dangerous if items are planted too close to HD's electrical equipment. In the event of an outage, or equipment failure, it is vital that IID personnel have immediate and safe access to its equipment to make the needed repairs. For public safety, and that of the electrical workers, it is important to adhere to standards that limit landscaping around electrical facilities. IID landscaping guidelines are available at https://www.iid.com/energy/vegetation-management . (Comment 19) PAGE 8
4-507

ATTACHMENT 7
CITY OF RANC 0 MIRAGC

CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270-2898 (760) 324-4511/328-2266

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION
To: ® Office of Planning and Research
® Chief Deputy County Clerk
Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92501
Project Title/Case Nos. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA23-0010, General Plan Zoning Map Amendment Case No. GPZMA23- 0004, and Tentative Tract Map Case No. TPM23-0003 (TPM 38041) Applicant: Mark Howard, La Paloma Homes, Inc.

Project Location: The project site is located on the east side of Via Josefina at the terminus of Victory Drive. APNs: 685-080- 031, 685-080-010, & 685-030-006.

Project Description: Consideration to subdivide the 8.42 -acre project site into a 17 residential lot gated community with lots ranging in size from approximately 12,511 square feet to 22,323 square feet. Private streets are proposed in addition to a retention basin and perimeter landscaping within the common areas of the development. Access to the site will be via a gated entry along Via Josefina, with an emergency access gate along Key Largo Avenue. A General Plan Zoning Map Amendment is also proposed to modify the land use designation of APN: 685-080-031 for a

1.5 acres portion of this parcel from Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) to Medium Density Residential (R - M). No single-family residence architectural plans are proposed as part of this project.

Notice of Determination
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Public Resources Code, Section 21108 or 21152. The City of Rancho Mirage has approved the above described project on and has determined:

1. The project ❑will ® will not have a significant effect/impact on the environment.

2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

3. ® A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

4. Mitigation measures ® were ❑ were not made conditions of approval for the project.

5. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan ® was ❑ was not adopted for this project.

6. A Statement of Overriding Considerations ❑ was ® was not adopted for this project.

7. Findings ® were ❑ were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

The City Council adopted the following Finding: The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This is to certify that the project file and record of project approval are available to the general public at: City of Rancho Mirage, 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270.

Mitigated Negative Declaration - Rancho Mirage City Council Date:

Ben Torres
Planning Manager
I hereby certify that the City of Rancho Mirage has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the Mitigated Negative Declaration and hearing record the project will not have a significant effect on the environment.

Date:

Ben Torres
® Lead Agency ❑ Responsible Agency Planning Manager
4-508

ATTACHMENT 8

STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission DATE: September 12, 2024
FROM: Ben Torres, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA23-0010, General Plan Zoning Map Amendment Case No. GPZMA23-0004, and Tentative Tract Map Case No.

TTM23-0003 (TTM 38041)

SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2024 -PC -(Next -in - Order), recommending that the City Council take the following actions:
a) Adopt Resolution No. 2024 -(Next -in -Order), approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH# 2024050169) for the Proposed Project based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA23-0010; and b) Adopt Resolution No. 2024 -(Next -in -Order), approving General Plan Zoning Map Amendment Case No. GPZMA23-0004; and, approving Tentative Tract Map Case No.

TTM23-0003.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Aerial Photo

2. Public Hearing Notice

3. Planning Commission Resolution

4. Resolution approving the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program
and Mitigated Negative Declaration
(SCH#2024050169)
FACTS

1. Applicant:

2. Purpose of Request:

5. Resolution approving the Proposed GPZMA
and TTM

6. Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration

7. Draft Notice of Determination

8. Tentative Tract Map No. 38041

9. Landscape Plans

10. GPZMA Exhibit
Mark Howard, La Paloma Homes, Inc.

Consideration to subdivide the 8.42 -acre project
site into a 17 residential lot gated community with
lots ranging in size from approximately 12,511
square feet to 22,323 square feet. Private streets
are proposed in addition to a retention basin and
perimeter landscaping within the common areas of
the development. Access to the site will be via a
Planning Commission Staff Report
44G/616EM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 2 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

3. Location:

4. Project Size:

5. Existing Streets:

6. Existing Land Use:

7. Existing General Plan/Zoning:

8. Surrounding Land Use:

9. Surrounding General Plan/Zoning:

10. Environmental Information:

11.Application Deemed Complete

SUMMARY
gated entry along Via Josefina, with an emergency
access gate along Key Largo Avenue. A General
Plan Zoning Map Amendment is also proposed to
modify the land use designation of APN: 685-080-
031 for a 1.5 acres portion of this parcel from Very
Low Density Residential (R -L-2) to Medium Density
Residential (R -M). No single-family residence
architectural plans are proposed as part of this
project.

The project site is located on the east side of Via
Josefina at the terminus of Victory Drive. APNs:
685-080-031, 685-080-010, & 685-030-006.

8.42 acres
Via Josefina & Key Largo Avenue
Vacant
Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) — 2 DU/Gross
Acre and Medium Density Residential (R -M) — 4
DU/Gross Acre.

N: Unitarian Universalist Church of the Desert &
vacant land; E: Rancho Mirage Dog Park & vacant
land; S: Single Family Residence & vacant land; W:

Estilo residential development & Single -Family
Residences.

N & S: Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) &
Medium Density Residential (R -M); E: Public Park
(OS-PP)/Monterey Specific Plan, W: Very Low
Density Residential (R -L-2).

The recommendation is to adopt a Mitigated
Negative Declaration (SCH# 2024050169) based
on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA23-
0010 pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act.

August 28, 2024
The applicant, Mark Howard with La Paloma Homes, Inc. is requesting approval of a General Plan Zoning Map Amendment to modify the land use designation of 1.5 acres of the project site from Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) to Medium Density Residential (R -M). The subject

8.42 -acre project site is currently zoned a combination of R -L-2 for one parcel and R -M for two parcels. Tentative Tract Map No. 38041 consists of a seventeen -lot single-family residential subdivision, with associated street improvements and common area landscaping. No single- family residence architectural plans are proposed as part of this project.

BACKGROUND
Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses Planning Commission Staff Report 4GIIOl4�TEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 3 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

The relatively flat site contains native desert vegetation which include the Creosote Bush. The project site is comprised of three (3) vacant, undeveloped parcels. These parcels are subject to the Section 30 Design Guidelines and Master Circulation Plan.

The General Plan and zoning designation of the project site is Very Low Density Residential for one parcel (4.91 acres) and Medium Density Residential (3.51 acre) for two parcels. All adjacent properties have a residential General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation except for the Rancho Mirage Dog Park property to the east, which has a Public Park (OS -PP) designation.

The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property:

General Plan and Zoning Designation
Land Use
Project Site
Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) & Medium
Density Residential (R -M)
Vacant land
North
Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) & Medium
Density Residential (R -M)
Unitarian Universalist Church of
the Desert & vacant land
East
Public Park (OS-PP)/Monterey Specific Plan
Rancho Mirage Dog Park &
vacant land
South
Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) & Medium
Density Residential (R -M)
Single Family Residence &
vacant land
West
Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2)
Estilo residential development
& Single -Family Residences

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project will subdivide 8.42 acres into seventeen single-family residential lots and lettered lots for common areas that include the private streets, landscaped parkways, and a retention basin. The residential subdivision will be gated, similarly to other residential subdivisions in the vicinity. Access to the proposed parcels will be provided by the private street (Veduta Way) off Via Josefina.

Detailed site planning, building footprints, floor plan, exterior design, landscaping, and grading will be submitted for review during the development review application process for the future development of the proposed parcels. The development of the proposed parcels will be subject to the development standards of the underlying zoning district in effect at the time of application submittal.

GENERAL PLAN ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
The existing General Plan and zoning designation of the project site is Very Low Density Residential for one parcel (4.91 acres) and Medium Density Residential (3.51 acre) for two parcels. A 1.5 -acre portion of parcel (APN: 685-080-031) currently designated as Very Low Density Residential is proposed to be amended to Medium Density Residential to allow for. The remaining two parcels are designated as Medium Density Residential (R -M). This proposed change will align with the Medium Density Residential parcel to the north that is part of the project site and will create a more uniform zoning in the vicinity. In addition, properties along Key Largo Planning Commission Staff Report ITEM #
44G8/14

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 4 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Avenue have a Medium Density Residential designation, while properties along Via Josefina primarily maintain a Very Low Density Residential designation. Residential densities increase towards Monterey Avenue going east and the proposed land use change is in line with existing conditions in the vicinity. The minimum lot sizes also exceed the R -M zone and the average density for the project site is 2.02 dwelling units per gross acre which is compatible with the existing neighborhood. The project site will serve as a good transition and buffer between the higher residential densities allowed west of the project site.

In addition, this GPZMA will help achieve and/or establish the framework for implementation of Goals, Policies and Programs within the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan.

GOAL LU1: A resort residential community of desirable neighborhoods, a variety of community facilities, and high -quality development.

Response: Due to the unique configuration of the subdivision consisting of three parcels with different land use designations. The shift from R -L-2 to R -M will create a more desirable neighborhood by allowing a clean transition between the change in land uses.

Housing Goals & Policies
• GOAL H 1: A variety of housing types that meet the needs of residents in Rancho Mirage. • Policy H 1: The General Plan shall provide for a mixture of residential densities dispersed throughout Rancho Mirage.
• Policy H 2: The City's residential development standards shall allow for a diversity of housing types to provide new housing choices and enhance housing mobility while adhering to the General Plan's community design policies.

Response: The proposed change from R -L-2 to R -M for a 1.5 acre portion of the site will allow for more variety in housing types and allows for a mix of residential densities. Various housing choices will be available based on the configuration of lots and lot sizes contained within this subdivision. The minimum lot sizes also exceed the R -M zone and the average density for the project site is 2.02 dwelling units per gross acre which is compatible with the existing neighborhood. The project site will serve as a good transition and buffer between the higher residential densities allowed west of the project site.

ANALYSIS
Review Authority (Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Section 16.12.065) A tentative map is a map approving the division of land for the purpose of sale, lease, or financing, and is governed by the Subdivision Map Act. A tentative map prescribes how the land is to be subdivided. The City's Subdivision Ordinance (Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Title 16 Subdivisions) establishes the minimum standards for the design of the lots, and the public improvements which serve them.

Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgO14..EM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 5 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Once a tentative map is approved, the refined final map is approved by the City Council if deemed by the City Engineer to be in substantial conformance with the tentative map. The final map is then recorded with the Riverside County Recorder's Office, after which the newly created parcels may be individually sold and developed pursuant to the underlying General Plan and zoning regulations.

Tentative Tract Map No. 38041
The proposed subdivision complies with the City's Development Code standards pertaining to lot size and dimensions. The proposed single-family residential parcels range in size from 12,551 square feet to 22,323 square feet for an overall project density of 2.02 units per gross acre, which resembles other subdivisions of similar size along Via Josefina.

The following tables compares the proposed subdivision with the City's Development Code standards for both the R -L-2 and R -M zones considering the proposed General Plan Zoning Map Amendment:

Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) Parcels 1-6
Development
Feature
Development
Standards
Existing*
Proposed
Meets
Requirements
Parcel Width
Minimum
90 ft.
492.30 ft.

Proposed parcels range from 124
ft. to 155 ft.

Yes
Parcel Depth
Minimum
100 ft.
293.11 ft.

Proposed parcels range from 116
ft. to 155 ft.

Yes
Lot Size
Minimum
18,000 sq. ft.

3.41 acres
Proposed parcels range from
18,232 sq. ft. to 22,323 sq. ft.

Yes
Maximum
Density
2 dwelling
unit per gross
acre
maximum
N/A

1.76 units per gross acre
Yes
Medium Density Residential (R -M) Parcels 7-17
Development
Feature
Development
Standards
Existing*
Proposed
Meets
Requirements
Parcel Width
Minimum
70 ft.
665.72 ft.

Proposed parcels range from 83
ft. to 107 ft.

Yes
Planning Commission Staff Report
4GgD�(gETM #

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003

Page 6 of 25 ends

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Parcel Depth
Minimum
90 ft.
330.06 ft.

Proposed parcels range from 125
ft. to 160 ft.

Yes
Lot Size
Minimum
10,000 sq. ft.

5.01 acres
Proposed parcels range from
12,551 sq. ft. to 18,445 sq. ft.

Yes
Maximum
Density
4 dwelling
unit per gross
acre
maximum
N/A

2.2 units per gross acre
Yes
*Existing sizes and dimension based on proposed General Plan Zoning Map Amendment.

As set forth in the above analysis, the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Rancho Mirage General Plan, Zoning Code, and all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.

Access and Circulation
The Project site is located on the east side of Via Josefina at the terminus of Victory Drive. The proposed subdivision will be gated, similar to other residential developments in the vicinity.

Access to the proposed parcels will be provided by the private street (Veduta Way) off Via Josefina and an interior cul-de-sac street named Paesaggio Court. Staff routed the proposed street names to emergency services and the post office; no concerns with the street names were brought up. The private streets will be 37 feet wide and contain landscape islands in conformance with the Section 30 Design Guidelines. A secondary 24 -foot -wide emergency access gate will provide access to Key Largo Avenue and will be located south of the retention basin.

Grading and Drainage
The Project site naturally slopes to the west to east and is situated at an elevation of approximately 308 to 327 feet above mean sea level. Adjacent residential and vacant properties are flat -lying and are approximately at the same elevation as the site.

The proposed pad elevations for the seventeen (17) proposed lots have been determined by the site topography reviewed by the City Engineer. The table below lists the proposed pad elevations for each parcel:

Parcel
Proposed Pad Height
Proposed Lot 1
326.00 feet
Proposed Lot 2
325.3 feet
Proposed Lot 3
325.8 feet
Proposed Lot 4
325.8 feet
Proposed Lot 5
325.7 feet
Proposed Lot 6
323.0 feet
Proposed Lot 7
317.8 feet
Proposed Lot 8
316.6 feet
Proposed Lot 9
316.1 feet
Planning Commission Staff Report
4Ggo14(M #

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003

Page 7 of 25 ends

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Proposed Lot 10
315.7 feet
Proposed Lot 11
316.5 feet
Proposed Lot 12
316.1 feet
Proposed Lot 13
316.6 feet
Proposed Lot 14
317.8 feet
Proposed Lot 15
318.5 feet
Proposed Lot 16
319.0 feet
Proposed Lot 17
320.5 feet
All storm water and nuisance water drainage will be contained on site, including the street frontage area. Lot B located at the northeast corner of the project site will contain a retention basin which has a capacity of 47,013 cubic feet to serve the entire project site. As conditioned, the applicant is responsible for submitting the final hydrology report and grading plan to the Engineering Division for review and approval.

Entry, Landscaping, and Walls
The project site is located within Section 30. The Section 30 Design Guidelines require a minimum of a 19 feet parkway from the curb to a wall. The proposed project meets this requirement with the parkways along Via Josefina and Key Largo Avenue being 19 feet. The Section 30 Design Guidelines also require transparency in the front and side yards. The applicant proposed metal vehicle entry gates that allow for visibility and decorative wrought iron fencing along the front and side yards satisfying the requirement. A 6 -foot -tall black metal entry vehicular gate with various linear openings allows transparency into the subdivision on both the Via Josefina main entry and Key Largo Avenue emergency access gate. Four small decorative black metal shade structures (13' x 9'), with a maximum height of 10.5 feet will line the entry into the subdivision. The proposed shade structures are similar to those found within the Escala community along Via Marta. The subdivisions six-foot tall perimeter walls will be of an 8"x8" block painted white with 12"x12" breeze block along some segments of the wall to conform to the Section 30 Design Guidelines and the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code (RMMC). The landscape parkways along Via Josefina and Key Largo Avenue feature a desert -appropriate landscape palette and the required six-foot wide "Yosemite Brown" colored concrete meandering sidewalk in accordance with the Section 30 Design Guidelines. The private streets will contain three landscape islands with four total 36 inch box Sonoran Palo Verde trees in conformance with the Section 30 Design Guidelines. In addition, the retention basin will be richly landscaped with the same trees proposed in the subdivision and various shrubs like Purple Training Lantana and Pink Mulhy.

As stipulated in the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code (RMMC) Section 17.24.040 (B) trees must be planted at a rate of at least one tree for every thirty linear feet of street frontage. The project site has approximately 1,157 linear feet of frontage off Via Josefina and Key Largo Avenue with a proposed fifteen (15) Sonoran Palo Verde trees (36 -inch box) and twenty-three (23) Mulga trees. This will result in a ratio of one shade tree per every 30 feet, which meets the RMMC requirement. In between the trees, the landscape will be enriched forty (40) Date Palms (14 foot tall and by shrubs like Red Yucca. Ground cover will consist of Pewter Gray crushed rock in a 3/8" size.

Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgO14EM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 8 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

The proposed project's entry off Via Josefina features decorative Orco Plaza Stone interlocking pavers in a grey color to further enhance the subdivision.

ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE
As part of the subdivision review, staff sent notices to the Public Works Department, Riverside County Fire Marshal's Office, and all public utility companies and service agencies regarding the proposed subdivision on November 22, 2023. As conditioned all agencies are expected to provide service to the proposed parcels. Any received comments have been incorporated into this report and the Conditions of Approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An environmental assessment application was submitted for the proposed project and the determination was made that the project required an Initial Study. An Initial Study has been prepared resulting in the recommendation to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND).

Mitigation measures were recommended for Biological & Tribal Cultural Resources. A Notice of Determination will be filed with the Riverside County Clerk once a final determination has been made by the City Council. The complete Initial Study, along with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, is included in Attachment 3 — Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration.

A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was published in the Desert Sun on May 5, 2024, and distributed to interested parties on May 3, 2024. The Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 30 -day public review period starting on May 6, 2024 to June 4, 2024, and the City received one comment letter from the Imperial Irrigation District (IID).

While the City is not required to respond to comments, Sections 21091(d)(1) and 21092.5 of the Public Resources Code (PRC) and Section 150874 (b) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines require that before project approval a Lead Agency must consider all comments received before making a final determination. With due consideration of the proposed mitigation measures, the City included a response to comments which was included as in the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration.

SB18 & AB 52 Tribal Consultation
The City initiated tribal consultation in accordance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) and Senate Bill 18 (SB 18) on November 22, 2023, with contacts for twenty-four (24) tribes and representatives provided by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) notifying them of the proposed project. The City was contacted by two tribes which included the Agustine Band of Cahuilla Indians which mentioned they were unaware of specific cultural resources but to contact them if any are discovered. The Cahuilla Band of Indians requested tribal monitors during ground disturbing activities. No additional requests for formal consultation were received and the SB 18 and AB 52 noticing period was concluded on February 22, 2024.

NOTICING REQUIREMENT
Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Section 17.74.020, Hearing and notice, requires that all property owners, as shown on the county's latest equalized assessment roll, within a 500 -foot radius of Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgO14EM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 9 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
the boundaries of the subject parcel(s) be notified of matters requiring a public hearing. If the number of property owners to whom the notice would be mailed to is less than 25, then the mailing radius is required to be increased to 1,000 feet as measured from the exterior boundaries of the subject parcel.

On August 28, 2024, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the parcel boundary and posted at the City's designated community posting sites pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 17.74 of the Municipal Code. Notification of the public hearing was published in The Desert Sun on September 1, 2024. Any information addressed to the Planning Commission, but received after completion of this final report, will be distributed at the public hearing. No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report.

Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgO14J/EM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 10 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM23-0003 (Tentative Tract Map No. 38041) I. GENERAL

1. All improvements shall conform to the provisions of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code (RMMC), Title 16, (Subdivisions), unless specifically modified by any of the following conditions.

2. Development of the Subject Property shall require the appropriate entitlement process as determined by the Planning Division.

3. This tentative map approval shall be effective for two (2) years from the date of Planning Commission approval. A Final Map must be approved by the City within this specified time period, or the tentative map approval shall become null and void unless the expiration date for the tentative map is extended as provided by RMMC Section 16.12.090.

4. The applicant shall execute a written acknowledgment to the Planning Division stating acceptance of and compliance with all of the Conditions of Approval for this Tentative Tract Map and all associated cases, and that the plans submitted are in compliance with the Conditions of Approval. No modifications shall be made to said plans without written approval from the appropriate decision -making body.

5. The Conditions of Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun.

6. The development of the subject property shall conform substantially with the approved exhibits contained in Case No's. EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004 and TTM23-0003 and all associated cases on file in the Planning Division. This includes all dimensional and size specifications, landscaping, hardscape, design treatments (including color and materials), and the locations of perimeter walls and plant materials as shown in the landscape exhibits.

7. Prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant shall acknowledge that the approved project and any or all proposed modifications to the approved project shall be completed in accordance with applicable City Ordinances, Guidelines, and other requirements in effect at the time of building permit issuance.

8. All green waste shall be disposed of at a permitted composting facility. The applicant shall undertake or cause to be undertaken such action or actions as are necessary to permit and/or otherwise accommodate the implementation of recycling services. Such action or actions may include, but are not limited to: designating and providing adequate Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgO14TEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 11 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
area at convenient locations with appropriate access for the placement of dumpsters and/or bin sets; constructing permanent enclosures that meet all requirements of the Code of the City of Rancho Mirage for each dumpster and/or bin set; providing for the security of each dumpster to discourage scavenging, and; providing adequate indoor area at convenient locations for the collection and short-term storage of recyclables. The applicant shall submit a "Recycling Program" that has been reviewed by an agent of the City, which, at a minimum, explains, states or otherwise defines: (1) recyclables generated by type; (2) estimate by pounds for each recyclable generated; (3) number of dumpsters and/or plastic bin sets (one set equals three "baskets") needed to accommodate estimated recyclables; (4) location of each dumpster (may be identified on a map attached as an exhibit); (5) method of collection such as curbside at each residential unit or at rear of property by dumpster, etc.; and (6) pick-up schedule for recyclables. The applicant shall provide other such information as may be necessitated by the development proposal.

9. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1170, all gated communities of two or more residential units shall install a Knox entry system, consistent with any emergency access policy, for use by the Sheriffs Department. The City Manager or their designee shall implement the requirement and enforcement of this Condition of Approval.

10. The applicant shall comply with RMMC Chapter 9.60 which requires disclosure in the sale of residential property. The purpose of this chapter is to protect purchasers of new homes or lots for custom homes against unacceptable development on adjacent property by requiring the sellers of such homes and lots to disclose land use regulations applicable to contiguous properties and to disclose the nature of any development project approvals for such property that may exist.

11. The location of this project is considered an "infill site" with very close proximity to existing residences. Should the City receive complaints about construction noise from residents in close proximity of the project, the City may limit construction activities to the hours between 7am and 5pm.

12.The mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH Number 2024050169) based on Environmental Case No. EA23-0010 are hereby incorporated as Conditions of Approval. The property owner shall be responsible for implementing the mitigation measures contained within the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration, as necessary.

13. Within 5 days of project approval the applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Mirage a check in the total amount of $2,966.75 made payable to the City of Rancho Mirage for the CEQA filing fees for the IS/MND.

14. The applicant shall demonstrate that the project site has electrical availability prior to the issuance of Building Permits or by Building Occupancy as determined by the Development Services Director.

Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgO14TEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 12 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

II. PLANNING
Prior to City Council approval of the Final Map, the following Conditions shall be satisfied:

15.A detail of the entry area, including landscape, architectural, and dimensional information, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Director or their designee. The Planning Division reserves the right to request additional landscaping upon final inspection if it is determined that areas are devoid of plant or ground cover material.

A. The approved landscape plan may be modified only with City approval in a manner pursuant to Section 17.42.120 (Modification of a Development Plan Permit). Minor modifications to an approved plan may be considered by the Development Services Director.

B. The project shall be completed in accordance with the Ordinances, requirements, guidelines, and other criteria in effect at the time of construction.

C. Landscaping, Wall, and Grading Plans shall demonstrate that all electrical transformers, utility pads, cable TV and phone boxes, and similar utility fixtures will be screened, pursuant to RMMC Chapter 17.20 and/or installed underground if required.

D. Landscaping. The plans shall be submitted as a Landscape Documentation Package in accordance with Ordinance No. 990, and as amended by Ordinance 1101. Such Plan(s) shall be consistent with the Preliminary Landscape Plan, and the applicant shall provide evidence that the landscape plan has been reviewed and approved by the Riverside County Office of the Agricultural Commissioner and the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) prior to requesting a final inspection.

The final landscaping and irrigation plans shall incorporate the use of Evapotranspiration (ET) irrigation "smart" controllers which shall include automatic water scheduling, rain, and temperature sensors. Prior to a final inspection, the landscape contractor shall verify in writing with Planning staff that controllers have been installed, are correctly programmed, and operate with these features. More information on smart controllers can be found at www.irrigation.com . The project landscape architect shall submit written verification that the landscaping and irrigation has been installed per the approved plans. Parkway landscaping shall be installed prior to Final Map bonds being released.

E. Walls. Where perimeter walls are shown on the development plan they shall be designed with aesthetic relief and be of high -quality architectural design to compliment adjacent developments. In accordance with the Community Design Elements, the landscaped parkway and perimeter wall along all property lines shall be aesthetically enriched and subject to approval of Planning staff, with Architectural Review Working Group review as deemed necessary. All top of wall elevations and adjacent finish grade elevations for the project perimeter and entry walls shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division and City Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgI6TEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 13 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Engineer. The applicant shall contact the adjacent property owners if grading outside the subdivision boundaries is required for construction of the perimeter walls. This shall be accomplished prior to issuance of any permit.

16. Future neighborhood signage shall be subject to approval and issuance of a separate sign permit or sign program.

III. PUBLIC WORKS
Prior to City Council Approval of the Final Map, the following Conditions shall be satisfied:

17. FORMATION AND/OR ANNEXATION TO CFD
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 485 the applicant shall provide evidence that formation of, or annexation to a Communities Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 — Police and Fire services — to pay the City annually for public service costs associated with this project has been initiated. This requires the submittal of an application fee, the preparation of a boundary map, and 6-8 weeks processing time. The applicant is advised to begin the application process as soon as possible, because the CFD annexation must occur prior to issuance of Grading Permits, or prior to Final Map approval if there is one.

18. STUDIES AND CALCULATIONS REQUIRED
The applicant shall submit a soils report, geological and hydrology studies, and hydraulic calculations, as required by the City Engineer, prior to approval of the Grading Plan.

19.SECTION 30 COLORED SIDEWALK
Plans for the required Section 30 colored sidewalk, in accordance with City standards, shall be submitted to the Planning Division and City Engineer and shall be shown on the plan. The sidewalk shall have a medium broom finish on 4" thick P.C.0 (Portland Cement Concrete). The color shall be Davis Co. "Yosemite Brown" or approved equal. Where the sidewalk or street improvement and landscape is located on private property, a public access easement shall be provided and recorded, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The approved sidewalk shall be constructed along the project frontage and shall be maintained in perpetuity in a safe condition by the applicant.

20. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
The applicant shall be required to submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a licensed civil engineer to the City Engineer for plan check and approval. The grading and drainage plan shall be consistent with any and all conditions of approval associated with any applicable subdivision map and any Development Permit entitlements issued for the subject project by the City or any other responsible public agency. The grading and drainage plan shall conform to all city policies, standards, and regulations applicable to the project. In addition, if the project involves grading and drainage issues related to Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) facilities, written evidence of the District's approval shall be included with the submittal required by the City of Rancho Mirage.

Planning Commission Staff Report /1TEM#
44Gn4

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 14 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

21. STORMWATER RETENTION
The grading of the project shall be designed such that all storm water to the level of a 100 -year frequency storm; worst case of the 1, 3, 6, or 24 -hour duration, shall be retained on site, including the street frontage area. A Hydrology/Hydraulic Report, in accordance with the Riverside County Hydrology Manual, shall be submitted from a Registered Civil Engineer, showing how this stormwater is handled. Combination drywell/catch basins per city Standard 311 are expected on Via Josefina, one at the north end of the project frontage, and another just upstream from the project entry. On the Key Largo frontage, a catch basin and pipe to the retention basin at the northeast corner of the tract would be best, allowing overflow from the catch basin after retention of the worst case duration of the 100 year storm stormwater quota is met.

22. WQMP
Whether they are in areas that must retain 100% stormwater or not, all discretionary projects that meet any of the following criteria must submit "Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP)" in accordance with Appendix H of the Whitewater River Region Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) (available at:
http://content.rcflood.orq/N PDES/WhitewaterWS.aspx)
A.) "single family hillside residences that create 10,000 square feet or more of impervious area where natural slope is 25% or greater;
B) single-family hillside residences that create 10,000 square feet of impervious area where the natural slope is 10% or greater where erosive soil conditions are known; C.) Commercial and industrial developments of 100,000 square foot or more; D.) Automotive repair shops [includes Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 5013, 7532, 7333,7534, 7537, 7538, and 7539];
E.) Retail gasoline outlets disturbing greater than 5,000 square feet; F.) Restaurants disturbing greater than 5,000 square feet; G.) Home subdivisions with 10 or more housing units;
H.) Parking lots of 5,000 square feet or more or with 25 or more parking spaces and potentially exposed to Urban Runoff; or
I.) Discharge into the MS4 (aka Municipal Storm Drain System) and disturb an area of one acre or more, or disturb less than one acre, but are part of a larger common plan of development or sale (referred to as Other Development Projects) If any of the above criteria exist, or at the discretion of the City, a Final WQMP shall be required prior to permit issuance, with Recording of a Covenant, or other approved mechanism, establishing the WQMP as a Public Record that shall apply upon occupancy, and continuing forward, to all future operators/residents of the project. Any approved design modifications that take place during construction shall be documented and incorporated into the Recorded WQMP Covenant prior to occupancy.

On the basis of category "G" this project will need to do a Final WQMP.

Planning Commission Staff Report 44GgnEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 15 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

23. STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS If public infrastructure is to be included in this project, the applicant shall execute and submit the City of Rancho Mirage's Standard Agreement for Construction of Public Improvements for review and approval by the City Engineer and City Attorney. 24 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Street improvements shall be required as specified below. Paved access in accordance with the City Master Plan of Streets and City Standards shall be provided to the subdivision. Plans for the construction of the required street improvements shall be designed by a California Registered Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval. All street construction shall be in conformance with these plans and the City's General Plan and Standard Details. Plans shall be approved prior to or concurrent with Final Development Plan approval and construction shall occur prior to occupancy. The developer shall furnish proof that any Sewer and Water Improvement Plans have been reviewed and approved by CVWD. The developer shall furnish proof that the Fire Marshal has approved the Water Plans and Street layout for the project.

A.) Public Streets Via Josefina
i. Right-of-way along Via Josefina at a width of 30 feet from centerline shall be dedicated to the City of Rancho Mirage. An easement for the Section 30 Colored Meandering Sidewalk from 30 feet to 37 feet from centerline shall also be dedicated.
ii. Curb and Gutter shall be installed along the project frontage with the curb face at 18 feet from centerline. Asphalt paving shall be installed along the project per City Standards.
iii. Plans for the required 6' meandering bike path per Standard drawing 500, shall be submitted to the City Engineer, and shall be shown on the landscape, street, and grading plans and shall be constructed along the frontage. A sidewalk or alternative handicap accessible route shall be constructed from the bike path or sidewalk into the project. Where any meandering bike path is located on private property, a public access easement shall be provided and recorded subject to approval of the City Engineer.
iv. The design of the entry way shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
v. Until such time as an alternative public storm drain system or street surface drainage system can be completed, this project must accept the responsibility for absorbing the water from the 100 year storm street drainage along the project frontage and the tributary area upstream. vi. Landscape and irrigation plans for all public street parkways and median islands shall conform to City standards and be submitted for review and Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgITEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 16 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
approval by the City Engineer and Planning Division. Boulders shall not exceed 15" in height within 3 feet of a public street curb. Canopy trees shall be placed a minimum of 10 feet from public street curb and a minimum of 5 feet from sidewalks. Palm trees shall be placed a minimum of 5 feet from public street curb or sidewalk with a minimum trunk height of 10 feet. Right of way lines shall be shown on the final landscape plan.

Public Streets Key Largo
vii. Right-of-way along Key Largo at a width of 30 feet from centerline shall be dedicated to the City of Rancho Mirage, with a minimum 200 foot long transition to 44 feet from centerline at the north end. An easement for the Section 30 Colored Meandering Sidewalk from 30 feet to 37 feet from centerline shall also be dedicated, with a minimum 200 foot long transition at the north end where the easement would be from 44 feet to 51 feet from centerline. The existing barricade across Key Largo will be removed prior to the road construction.
viii. Curb and Gutter shall be installed along the project frontage with the curb face at 18 feet from centerline, with a minimum 200 foot long transition to 32 feet from centerline at the north end. Asphalt paving shall be installed along the project per City Standards.
ix. Plans for the required 6' meandering bike path per Standard drawing 500, shall be submitted to the City Engineer, and shall be shown on the landscape, street, and grading plans and shall be constructed along the frontage. A sidewalk or alternative handicap accessible route shall be constructed from the bike path or sidewalk into the project. Where any meandering bike path is located on private property, a public access easement shall be provided and recorded subject to approval of the City Engineer.
x. The design of the 24 foot wide emergency entry way shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
xi. Until such time as an alternative public storm drain system or street surface drainage system can be completed, this project must accept the responsibility for absorbing the water from the 100 year storm street drainage along the project frontage and the tributary area upstream. xii. Landscape and irrigation plans for all public street parkways and median islands shall conform to City standards and be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Planning Division. Boulders shall not exceed 15" in height within 3 feet of a public street curb. Canopy trees shall be placed a minimum of 10 feet from public street curb and a minimum of 5 feet from sidewalks. Palm trees shall be placed a minimum of 5 feet from public street curb or sidewalk with a minimum trunk height of 10 feet. Right Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgIEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 17 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
of way lines shall be shown on the final landscape plan.

B.) Private Streets/Parking Lots
i. Private street and/or parking lot paving shall consist of a minimum of 3" A.C. paving over 4" of compacted Class II aggregate base material. On private streets and parking lots, and as may be required by a condition of approval, decorative concrete or other surfacing materials shall be reviewed by Public Works for conformance to Public Works standards.
ii. On private streets and parking lots, non-standard curb and gutter maybe acceptable if the City's standard drainage criteria is satisfied, and the specific non-standard curb and gutter is approved by the Department of Public Works.
iii. Private streets within the project shall be constructed with a minimum two- way travel way of 36 feet. Any median islands shall have a minimum one- way travel way of 24 feet clearance on either side of them. Cul-de-sacs with standard 45 feet to curb face radius would therefore have a 9 foot to curb face maximum radius on any island centered in the cul-de-sac.

The normal centered survey monument can be replaced by two or more offset survey tags in top of the island curb, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Private Street right-of-way should be set at the back of curb. Private street paving shall consist of a minimum of 3" A.C. paving over 4" of compacted Class II aggregate base material.

25. DEDICATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
All easements for drainage facilities necessary to accommodate the final approved Grading and Drainage Plan shall be offered for dedication to the appropriate serving agency. Such offer shall be incorporated on the Final Map or as required by the City Engineer.

26. DEDICATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS
A ten (10) foot public utility easement adjacent to the curb and gutter and edge of pavement shall be provided by the property owner for all public and private streets, and for public streets where the public right-of-way is less than the required 10 feet. All necessary utilities: sewer, water, electric, phone, fiber optic communications, natural gas, and television cable shall be provided to the lots and along the property frontage, unless otherwise approved.

27. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REQUIRED
All existing or proposed Imperial Irrigation District, General Telephone, CATV, or other overhead service facilities, shall be installed underground in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 12.16 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code. The undergrounding installation of all existing or proposed overhead distribution utility lines shall be completed Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgIEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 18 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
and/or appropriate guarantee arrangements shall be entered into for any structure constructed pursuant to this approval as required by the City Engineer. Such guarantee arrangement shall be approved by the City administrative staff and the City Attorney and shall include the posting of improvement security adequate to secure the periphery of the subject property; and as identified above and as required in Section 12.16 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code.
28 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
A sanitary sewer system shall be required and shall be installed in accordance with the provisions established and set forth by the regulations of the Coachella Valley Water District, the Riverside County Department of Public Health, and/or the regional Water Quality Control Board. All necessary easements shall be provided. If the sewer is routed through the 24 foot wide emergency access road, the gate shall be provided with locks to the satisfaction of both the Fire Marshall and CVWD. 29 DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM
A domestic water system shall be required and shall be installed in accordance with the provisions established and set forth by the regulations of the Coachella Valley Water District, the Riverside County Department of Public Health, and/or the regional Water Quality Control Board. All necessary easements shall be provided. 30 LOCAL AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (LAQMP)
The applicant shall prepare a Local Air Quality Management Plan (LAQMP) pursuant to Ordinance No. 855, Municipal Code Chapter 7.01. Said LAQMP shall detail the project's potential impacts upon the air quality of the area and any necessary mitigation measures and shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of the Grading Permit. For ease of preparing a LAQMP, the applicant may contact the Public Works Department regarding use of the LAQMP worksheet. Projects over 10 acres shall also submit the 8.5"x11" format Dust Control Plan required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for review by the City. At the time of payment of the permit fees the developer shall submit a "dust control deposit" to be determined from the acreage and the current fee schedule.

31. SWPPP/NOI
Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the Property Owner shall submit the completed NOI (Notice of Intent) form and site plan with the appropriate fee, to the State Water Quality Control Board for the General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit. The WDID number issued shall be placed on the cover sheet of the Grading Plans as Proof of Submittal. The SWPPP promised by the NOI is required to be kept on the project site and may be requested for viewing by City or Water Quality Control Board personnel.

32. Blowsand Mitigation Plan
Since this project is located in an area that is subject to occasional high winds and migrating sand, the subdivider shall be required to submit a blowsand mitigation plan prepared by a licensed civil engineer to the City Engineer for plan check and approval.

The blowsand mitigation plan shall identify the specific measures and describe the Planning Commission Staff Report 4Gil1 EM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 19 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
specific procedures that will be implemented to adequately mitigate blowsand impacts on all of the project's on -site and off -site improvements. All improvements for blowsand protection shall be depicted on the project's grading and drainage plan. In addition, all marketing materials and CC&R's shall identify that the project is located within a blowsand area.

33. CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The construction of all required public and private improvements, including but not limited to landscaping, sewer, water, curb and gutters, paving, drainage facilities, and other required improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy of any structure and/or the subdivider shall enter into an agreement, acceptable to the City, ensuring the construction of such improvements within eighteen (18) months of City Council approval of the Final Map.

34. WRITTEN VERIFICATION
Prior to release of bonds or financial guarantees, the applicant or his successor shall provide written verification that the improvements have been installed in accordance with the approved plans.

35.AS-BUILT PLANS
A complete set of "As -Built" Grading, Sewer, Water, Landscaping, Street, Storm Drain, and all other required improvement plans shall be submitted by the engineer of record for review and approval, prior to any occupancy or release of Subdivision Bonds.

36. SUBDIVISION MAP
A subdivision map shall be processed and recorded prior to any release of permits.

37. SECURITY
In accordance with the request of the Rancho Mirage Police Chief, the site shall be fenced and gated for security purposes. Screening material shall be placed on the fence to help block blowsand and to block views through the fence. If necessary, the applicant shall provide a state licensed private security officer during the time construction workers are not onsite.

38. PAD CERTIFICATION
Prior to release of Building Permits, a Pad Certification submitted from a Licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer, attesting to the elevation matching the rough grade pad elevation shall be submitted to validate the rough grading completion.

39. COMPACTION REPORT
Prior to the release of Building Permits, the lot(s) for the building(s) shall have a compaction report submitted from a Geotechnical Engineer attesting to the buildable pad being compacted at least 90% of maximum relative density. If any over -excavation, or slopes steeper than 2:1, are needed for the building pad, a Geotechnical Engineer shall submit a document attesting to the acceptability of this non-standard earthwork in accordance with the recommendations of the preliminary soil report.

Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgIJ/EM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 20 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

40. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REAPPORTIONMENT
If the property to be subdivided is located within the boundaries of an Assessment District, assessments shall be reapportioned over the property to account for the newly created lots.

41. PARK FEES
Applicant shall pay all applicable parkland fees for the acquisition and/or development of community parks and recreational facilities in those amounts in effect at the time the grading permit is issued.

42. IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY
Prior to occupancy, the construction of all required public improvements, including but not limited to sewer, water, curb, and gutters, paving to join, stormwater drainage facilities, and other required utility improvements shall be completed.

43. CVWD LETTER
Prior to occupancy, if applicable, a letter from Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) shall be submitted stating that all the district fees have been paid and all requirements have been met for development.

IV. CITY ATTORNEY
Prior to City Council approval of the Final Map, the following Conditions shall be satisfied:

44. INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval. The City shall notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding of which the City has written notice, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

45. REIMBURSEMENTS
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this Condition.

46. IMPROVEMENT SURETY
Pursuant to Chapter 15.64.280 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, all public improvements proposed with the Development Plan submittal, or required by the adopted approval Conditions, shall be guaranteed by cash bonds, letters of credit, or other legal instruments acceptable to the City Attorney and City Council.

47. RELEASE OF PLANS
Written authorization must be obtained from any certified, licensed, or registered Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgITEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 21 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
professional who signed the original building plans authorizing the plans to be made available by the City to all subsequent owners upon request (if on file with the City at the time of the request) for use by any subsequent owners solely for the construction, maintenance, operation, and use of the subject building(s) at the Project Site.

48. NOTICE TO CITY UPON DEFAULT, FORECLOSURE OR BANKRUPTCY In the event that the applicant receives a notice of default from any lender in connection with funds loaned to the applicant for the proposed development, or that any security instrument given by the applicant to any lender is foreclosed upon whether through a trustee's sale or otherwise, or that the applicant files a petition for bankruptcy, the applicant shall immediately notify the City of such notice of default, foreclosure sale, and/or filing of the bankruptcy petition, as the case may be.

49. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS (CC&RS) The subdivider shall submit to the City a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) which shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney that the entire project will be developed and maintained in accordance with the intent and purpose of the approval. The approved documents shall be recorded concurrently.

50.The applicant shall submit documents for recordation which clearly prohibit installation of improvements in the common area by individual homeowner or documents which allow and govern installation of such improvements within the identified common areas. The documents shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.

51. The CC&Rs shall be submitted to the City for review and shall contain provisions for a Homeowners' Association, with the unqualified right to assess owners of individual units for reasonable maintenance costs to common areas and improvements. The Homeowners' Association shall have the right to lien units of the owners who default in the payment of any assessment so provided. Any deed of trust recorded prior to said CC&Rs shall be subordinated to the CC&Rs. Any lien imposed shall not be superior to any lien for property taxes or government assessments. The CC&Rs will be clearly marked to identify those sections addressing the Conditions of Approval. 52 MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS
The current and future property owner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining in compliance with all City standards for the same, the on -site and off -site landscaping and integrated architectural features required by this entitlement; all perimeter landscaping shall be maintained in a first-class condition. Landscape maintenance shall consist of regular watering mowing, pruning, fertilizing, clearing of debris and weeds, and the removal and replacement of irrigation systems, in compliance with all relevant and applicable provisions of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code. Integrated architectural features must be kept in a manner which maintains the desirability of the immediate area and neighboring areas and respects the harmonious relationship with existing and adjoining developments. Due regard for preservation of each feature and its intended irrigation with surrounding landscaping, buildings, structures, screening, and signs is required. All features must be maintained in a manner commonly accepted by professionals who are experts in the care and preservation of each particular type of Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgITEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 22 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
feature. A covenant to assure continued maintenance of on -site and off -site required landscaping and integrated architectural features by the current and future property owners or other liable entity, consistent with the terms and provisions of this condition of approval, shall be prepared in a format approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder against all parcels created with this subdivision and any subsequent amendments thereto.

V. FIRE MARSHAL

53.The proposed project may have a cumulative adverse impact of the Fire Department's ability to provide an acceptable level of service. These impacts include an increased number of emergency and public service calls due to the increased presence of structures, traffic, and population. The project proponents/developers will be expected to provide for a proportional mitigation to these impacts via capital improvements and/or impact fees.

54. Fire Department emergency vehicle apparatus access road locations and design shall be in accordance with the California Fire Code, City of Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, and Riverside County Fire Department Standards. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to building permit issuance.

55. Fire Department water system(s) for fire protection shall be in accordance with the California Fire Code, City of Rancho Mirage Municipal and Riverside County Fire Department Standards. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to building permit issuance.

56. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the required water system, including all fire hydrant(s), shall be installed, and accepted by the appropriate water agency and the County Fire Department prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot. Contact the Fire Department to inspect the required fire flow, street signs, all weather surfaces, and all access and/or secondary access. Approved water plans must be at the job site.

Planning Commission Staff Report 4GgI6TEM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 23 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

FINDINGS
Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM23-0003 (Tentative Tract Map No. 38041) Pursuant to RMMC Section 16.12.065 Action on tentative tract maps, a tentative tract map may be approved only if the following findings are made:

1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City's General Plan as specified in Section 65451 of the California Government Subdivision Map Act. The current General Plan and zoning designation for the Project Site is Very Low Density Residential (R - L -2) and Medium Density Residential (R -M). The maximum residential densities for the R -L-2 zone are 2 dwelling units per gross acre and for the R -M zone 4 dwelling units per gross acre. Overall the project has a combined density of 2.02 dwelling units per gross acre but densities within each of the two zones comply with their maximums. As conditioned, the proposed tentative map is consistent with the City's General Plan and Subdivision Map Act.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance requirements, as conditioned. The development of the proposed parcels will be subject to the development standards of the underlying zoning district in effect at the time of application submittal. As set forth in the above analysis, the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the City's General Plan, zoning, and all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. The General Plan and zoning designation of the project site is Very Low Density Residential for one parcel (4.91 acres) and Medium Density Residential (3.51 acre) for two parcels.

A 1.5 -acre portion of parcel (APN: 685-080-031) currently designated as Very Low Density Residential is proposed to be amended to Medium Density Residential. The remaining two parcels are designated as Medium Density Residential (R -M). This proposed change will align with the Medium Density Residential parcel to the north that is part of the project site and will create a more uniform zoning in the vicinity.

The proposed GPZMA will help achieve and/or establish the framework for implementation of Goals, Policies and Programs within the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan.

GOAL LU1: A resort residential community of desirable neighborhoods, a variety of community facilities, and high -quality development.

Response: Due to the unique configuration of the subdivision consisting of three parcels with different land use designation. The shift from R -L-2 to R -M will create a more desirable neighborhood by allowing a clean transition between the change in land uses.

Housing Goals & Policies:
• GOAL H 1: A variety of housing types that meet the needs of residents in Rancho Mirage.
• Policy H 1: The General Plan shall provide for a mixture of residential densities dispersed throughout Rancho Mirage.
• Policy H 2: The City's residential development standards shall allow for a diversity Planning Commission Staff Report /1TEM#
44Gn4

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 24 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
of housing types to provide new housing choices and enhance housing mobility while adhering to the General Plan's community design policies.

Response: The proposed change from R -L-2 to R -M for a 1.5 -acre portion of the site will allow for more variety in housing types and allows for a mix of residential densities. Various housing choices will be available based on the configuration of lots and lot sizes contained within this subdivision.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development, as conditioned. The proposed parcels comply with the City's Development Code standards pertaining to minimum lot size and dimension requirements for the underlying zoning designation of the Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) and Medium Density Residential (R -M) zones.

4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, as conditioned. The proposed project consists of two different zoning districts and has an overall density of 2.02 dwelling unit per gross acre. Maximum densities in the Very Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential Zones do not exceed the maximum permitted density. No variances or exceptions are requested. No development is being proposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision. Detailed site planning, building footprints, floor plan, exterior design, landscaping, and grading will be submitted for review during the development review application process for the future development of the proposed parcels. The development of the proposed parcels will be subject to the development standards of the underlying zoning district in effect at the time of application submittal.

5. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on the implementation of the projects Biological Resource Mitigation Measures there would be no potential significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources.

6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, as conditioned. As part of the subdivision review, staff sent notices to the Public Works Department, Riverside County Fire Marshal's Office, and all public utility companies and service agencies regarding the proposed subdivision on November 22, 2023. As conditioned all agencies will be expected to provide service to the proposed parcels, including providers of gas, electrical, water, sewer, and cable telecommunication services. Permits are required to be obtained to construct the new site improvements. No public health impacts are expected.

7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, as conditioned. The subdivision's design complies with the Section 30 Design Guidelines. As part of the subdivision review, staff sent notices to the Public Works Department, Riverside County Fire Marshal's Office, and all public utility companies and service agencies regarding the proposed subdivision on November Planning Commission Staff Report 4Gil1 EM#

DATE: September 12, 2024
EA23-0010, GPZMA23-0004, & TTM23-0003 Page 25 of 25
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
22, 2023. Any received comments have been incorporated into the staff report and the Conditions of Approval. The Tentative Map has been conditioned to record any necessary easements and abandon existing easements that are deemed unnecessary by the City Engineer. The incremental impacts of the project on service system capacities are mitigated by the dedications and public improvements required within the Conditions of Approval requiring all necessary dedications and public improvements to be in accordance with the City's adopted General Plan.

8. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH Number 2024050169) was prepared based on Environmental Case No. EA23-0010 pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Section 15168. The document contains mitigation measures pertaining to Biological Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources. Environmental impacts will be less than significant with implementation of the project's mitigation measures.

Planning Commission Staff Report 4Gil1TEM#

ATTACHMENT 9
. ....................................................................................................

CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 - 2:OOP.M.

MINUTES
Meeting Location:

City of Rancho Mirage
City Hall - Council Chamber
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
CALL TO ORDER - 2:00 P.M.
a) Flag Salute: Led by Commissioner Curran.
b) Roll Call: Agostini, Bryant, Chanter, Curran — Present.

Absent: Grey.

MOVED/SECONDED BY BRYANT/CHANTER TO EXCUSE COMMISSIONER GREY'S ABSENCE. MOTION CARRIED 4/0.

COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Vice Chair Chanter stated that she was glad to be back after being ill .

Chair Agostini commented he was also glad to be back after the break and looked forward to the upcoming season.

Commissioner Bryant mentioned the recent fires and thanked firefighters and law enforcement. He commented on the City's commitment to affordable housing.

NON -AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS — None.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES — July 11, 2024, Regular Meeting.

MOVED/SECONDED BY CURRAN/AGOSTINI TO APPROVE THE JULY 11, 2024, REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED 3/1 WITH VICE CHAIR CHANTER ABSTAINED.

INFORMATIONAL ITEM — Implementation of Background Check Policy for City Volunteers.

Ben Torres, Planning Manager, presented the staff report.

Public Comments
Brad Anderson, resident of Rancho Mirage, spoke in opposition of the City's background check policy for City appointees and volunteers.
09/12/2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 4_534e 1 of 6

Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Bryant thanked Mr. Anderson for his written letter. He added that he did not have a problem with the background check policy, adding that he had been background checked many times throughout his career.

PUBLIC HEARING

1. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0007 and Tentative Parcel Map Case No.

TPM24-0003 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 38978) —Applicant: Amir Fayazrad, P.E. on behalf of Le Mirage Estates LLC. Consideration to subdivide 4.84 acres into four single-family residential lots and other common lots for a private cul-de-sac street and landscaped parkway. The subject property is located ±1,450 feet north of the intersection of Country Club Drive and Vista Del Sol (APNs: 685-280-007 and 685-280-008).

A. Consider the filing of a Notice of Exemption based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA24-0007 and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions); and,
B. Consider approval of Tentative Parcel Map Case No. TPM24-0003 (TPM 38978), subject to the Conditions of Approval and based on the content and Findings in the staff report.

Joy Tsai, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.

Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Curran commented that he reviewed the plans for the proposed project. He noted that it resembled other subdivisions in the area and that it appeared to meet and exceed all the requirements of the City's development code. He did not see any reason not to move forward with this project.

Vice Chair Chanter inquired about the price of the future homes and asked staff to clarify the public street condition of approval in the staff report. She asked what would happen if the developer did not complete the project and the subdivision was not designed to withstand storm damage.

Ms. Tsai responded that there were no development plans for residences submitted with the request. She stated that subdividers were responsible for improving their side of the street and explained that they would have to go through the final map process and subdivision improvements to ensure design requirements were met.

Majna Dukic, Development Services Director, added that the developers are required to go through the Public Works Department. She also explained that the City was looking into potentially improving Vista Del Sol, but if the City did not move forward with improvement, the developer would be responsible to install their share of improvements.

Chair Agostini commented that the project was unique because of the aesthetic that each lot would provide with its own retention basin.
09/12/2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes e 2 of 6

Commissioner Bryant added that all the requirements had been met. He mentioned Vista Del Sol was a blank canvas and there were a lot of the five -acre parcels that should be developed into four lot subdivisions. He discussed the existing Vista Dunes streetscape and encouraged the developer to enhance the proposed landscaping with color and trees.

Public Comments — None
MOVED/SECONDED BY CURRAN/CHANTER THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION:

A. APPROVE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CASE NO. EA24-0007 AND PURSUANT TO THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15315 (MINOR LAND DIVISIONS); AND,
B. APPROVE THE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE NO. TPM24-0003 (TPM 38978),

SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND BASED ON THE CONTENT AND FINDINGS IN THE STAFF REPORT.

MOTION CARRIED 4/0.

2. Minor Conditional Use Permit Case No. CUP24-0002 — Applicant: Dani Pauley, KHA Architects. Consideration to construct a ground -level pickleball court with no illumination. The subject property is located at 6 Coronado Court (APNs: 682-050-007 & -008).

A. Consider the filing of a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15303 (Class 3 — New Construction); and, B. Consider approval of Minor Conditional Use Permit Case No. CUP24-0002, subject to the Conditions of Approval and based on the content and Findings in the staff report.

Ben Torres, Planning Manager, presented the staff report and thanked Landon Stitt, the City's Development Services summer intern, for working on the project.

Public Comments — None.

Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Curran commented that the project met City standards and the HOA had approved it.

Vice Chair Chanter concurred that the pickleball court had dense landscape coverage and there was no lighting proposed. She thought it to be appropriate for the area.

Chair Agostini added that he agreed with the rest of the Commission, and he did not have any concerns about the project.

Commissioner Bryant commented that the development was in a good neighborhood. He inquired if the court was at ground level and about the process for adding lights in the future. 09/12/2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes `t /� _5 e 3 of 6

Mr. Torres responded that the court was at ground level and any lighting proposed would come back to the Planning Commission for review. He further elaborated that various factors would be reviewed regarding lighting height, fixture locations, and photometrics for any future change.

MOVED/SECONDED BY CURRAN/CHANTER THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION:

A. APPROVE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) SECTION 15303 (CLASS 3 — NEW CONSTRUCTION); AND,
B. APPROVE THE MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. CUP24-0002,

SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND BASED ON THE CONTENT AND FINDINGS IN THE STAFF REPORT.

MOTION CARRIED 4/0.

3. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA23-0010, General Plan Zoning Map Amendment Case No. GPZMA23-0004, and Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM23-0003 (Tentative Tract Map No. 38041) — Applicant: Mark Howard, La Paloma Homes, Inc. Consideration to subdivide the 8.42 -acre project site into a seventeen residential lot gated community with lots ranging in size from approximately 12,511 square feet to 22,323 square feet. Private streets are proposed in addition to a retention basin and perimeter landscaping within the common areas of the development. Access to the site will be via a gated entry along Via Josefina, with an emergency access gate along Key Largo Avenue. A General Plan Zoning Map Amendment is also proposed to modify the land use designation of APN: 685-080-031 for a 1.5 acres portion of this parcel from Very Low Density Residential (R -L-2) to Medium Density Residential (R -M). No single-family residence architectural plans are proposed as part of this project. The subject property is located on the east side of Via Josefina at the terminus of Victory Drive (APNs: 685- 080-031, 685-080-010, & 685-030-006).

A. Consider the recommendation for the Planning Commission to adopt Resolution No. 2024 -PC -(Next -in -Order), recommending that the City Council take the following actions:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2024 -(Next -in -Order), approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH# 2024050169) for the Proposed Project based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA23- 0010; and,
2) Adopt Resolution No. 2024 -(Next -in -Order), approving General Plan Zoning Map Amendment Case No. GPZMA23-0004; and, approving Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM23-0003.

Ben Torres, Planning Manager, presented the staff report.

Public Comments
Mario Gonzalez, representing the applicant, explained that his company had been in the Coachella Valley for over four decades and had built several hundred housing units in Rancho Mirage. He 09/12/2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes `t /� _5 e 4 of 6

added that he reviewed the conditions of approval and accepted them.

Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Curran commented that he thoroughly reviewed the project and felt that it was a good project.

Vice Chair Chanter agreed that it looked like a good project and mentioned the importance of a variety of housing options in the City.

Chair Agostini asked if there was a bike path on the perimeter of the development.

Mr. Torres explained the path along Via Josefina and Key Largo Ave complied with the Section 30 Design Guidelines.

Chair Agostini finalized his comments by adding that he was glad that the developer accepted all the Conditions of Approval.

Commissioner Bryant complimented Mr. Gonzalez, noting he was familiar with his developments and that they were of a high quality. Commissioner Bryant expanded on the zone change request for a portion of the project and agreed with the rationale. He inquired about improvements along Key Largo Ave.

Mr. Torres answered Commissioner Bryant's questions about the street improvements and the landscaping, stating that it was going to be richly landscaped and improved along the project frontage half width.

Commissioner Bryant inquired about access to utilities.

Mr. Torres addresses Commissioner Bryant's question.

Vice Chair Chanter inquired about what would happen if a cultural artifact was found on the project site.

Mr. Torres explained mitigation measures for cultural resources.

MOVED/SECONDED BY CHANTER/CURRAN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2024 -PC -06, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS:

A. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2024 -(NEXT -IN -ORDER), APPROVING THE

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH# 2024050169) FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CASE NO. EA23-0010; AND, B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2024 -(NEXT -IN -ORDER), APPROVING GENERAL PLAN ZONING MAP AMENDMENT CASE NO. GPZMA23-0004; AND,
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CASE NO. TTM23-0003.

MOTION CARRIED 4/0.
09/12/2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 4_538e 5 of 6

ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to consider, the Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 2:49 P.M.

Prepared by: Deanna Mendoza
Development Services Technician
Date Approved by Planning Commission: 9/26/2024
09/12/2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 4-5 e 6 of 6

ATTACHMENT 10
o
VICTORY DR _
ENISTI
Sul
APN 605-030-604
REAOOBEIML0E, ZON1E: TI -IA MUNCH, ZOPI]CE-a 5 -UPI
ANN 626-630-053 - -
02 APN 41504000+m05
VH000A5 LI
ZONE: p7L-O
80' 124
MO 06

9. 127. _
LOT K
1,030 SF

0.023 AC
Oo
LANDSC
z
LOT L

2.133 Sr

0.048 AC
no, TRAcT MAR
U.
416.16 1
15'431 9.251 A14.60
Nvo311 s 3cL5'
LOT 1
20,625 SF

0.473 AC
PAD 326.0
40T J
66 SF

0.010 AC
4135131E 8 ME

TO HE REDUCED
S 25
LOT 6
22,323 SF

0.512 AC
P. 323.0
041X185.16'. 41.
06 LOT 8

2.782 SF

0.293 AC
PAD 316.0
2_832

09. 138.23
LOT 7

12.785 SF

0.293 AC
P. 317.8
e 583+53 s0 LOT I
944 SF
_0.021 AC
LOT 2
18,334 SF

0.420 AC
PAD 325.3
LOT 3
18,232 SF

0.418 AC
PAD 325.8
S
O"d n

WIOTH ON
/sl E3 A90
LOT
007 SF

0.018 AC
,.0 seR 3602
4mp0 m w 8489
LOT 5
18,418 SF
0,422 AC
PAD 325.7
so
87 56
LOT 17

13.164 SF
0,302
PAD 320.0. 5
51 LOT A

VEDUTA WAY
39,727 SF

0.912 AC
39,2r. �e9
LOT 16
12,580 SF

0.288 AC
PAD 319.0

93.09 LOT 13

2.551 SF

0.268 AC
PAD 31,6
25 8436 D9
OM DSO 6.32'
BC
LOT 14
,587 SF
0,288 AC
PAD 317.8
n.1O }'•
e ro432 W
LOT 15
18,445 SF
0,423 AC
PAD 318,5
J
"454 AP566N5 9 000
)
LOT 4
18,892 SF

0.433 AO
PAD 325.8
10 ISESOC TRICE, ZONE : GS -L-2
ANN.8.5410415=0 09 T
VACANT
ZONE: R -AI
LANOSCArEEA0.A5MEN
TTA9 00040
'1 /32' 0
SF

0.028 AC
OT E
21,377 SF

0.490 AC
,..v161. 878

PRO R/W
0 2
J
r
Y
LOT F
0,064 SF
O.W4 PG
EoST
P/L

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA �a
9 gel
Q1 90
0 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38041

J FGFND

BOUNDARY

LOT UNE

CENTERLINE

BUILDING SETBACK LINE
-. - - -.. .-• EXISTING WALL SEWER
EXISP

EXISTING WATER LINE

EXISTING CABLE LINE

EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE

EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
EXISTING GATE vALVE

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING ER MANHOLE

EXISTING POWER POLE
ExISTING CABLE STRUCTURE

EXISTING CONTONN

EXISTING HEDGE
ABBREVIATIONS:
rt T1'11 0 w5F SWARE FEET

MIST IMINO
PROP P.POSED

NM ASSESSOR'S PARSEL NUMISER
NW RIG. OF WAT
• GRADE OREN<

AC ACREAGE

MB MAP BOOK
rtrtCrt
POE PLISUC 1.151. EASENENT
HrtH PONT
) 603066

CEG CAE AND OSTER
• ELEVATION
• EDGE OF PAVEMPN1
IFC,AL DFSCRIPTION:

THELAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW
IS
S15 SITUATED

BED THE
CITY OF. RANCHO MIRAGE, IN THE COUNTY

OF R CALIFORNIA,
PARCEL A ART: 685-080-031
PARCEL 1 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 15-02 RECORDED JULY 29 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0337327 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST

QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND A PORNON DE THE 11D -WEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTOV OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST SHIP QUARTER OF SECTION 30 TOWN 4 SOUTH, CONE 6 FIST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING Al E NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30: THENCE N 89,1,15'L ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTH HU, A DISTANCE OF 3000 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:

THENCE CONTINUING N 8943'15'E, ALONG SAID NORTH LIRE, A DISTANCE OF 50000 FEET; THENCE LANNG SAID NOR. UINE. 5 0709'26'6, A DISTANCE OF 33281 FOET TO A POINT ON .E SOUTH LINE OF HE NORTH THAI! OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30:

THENCE 5 894218'6, ALONG 500 SOUTH LINE. A DISTANCE OF 199.99 FEET TO .E NORTHEAST

CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF HE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF C NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECNON 30:

THENCE " DISTANCE OF 155.79 FEET TO A POINT ON THE

EAST LINE DE THE SOUTHWEST WAFER OE THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAC AID SECTION ON 30.

THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, 5 865702'60 A DISTANCE OF 3000] FEET TO A PONT ON HE EAST GHT DE WAY UNE OF VIA JOSEFINA:

THENCE N 100926'L ALONG SOD EAST RIGHT OF WAY UNE A 051104E OF 49269 FEET TO HE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL B: EPIC 685-030-006
THE SO. , OF THE SOUTHEAST W OF THE NORTHEAST SI OF DIE TOWNSHIP 4 60000 B N , RANGE 6 EAST, SAN 01004600 ASE AND MERIDIAN NORTHWEST 14 OF SECTION

CNN, OR
RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ACCORDING TO THE oFTICWI PLAT HEREOF.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WEST A.

EXCEPPNG THEREFROM AL 014 AND OTHER MINERAL DEPOSITS, IN HE LAND 5O PATENTED,TOGETHER WITH THE RICHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE AND REMOVE THE SAME ACCORDING TO HE PP VISIONS OF RECORDS.ID ACT OF JUNE I, 1938 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1958, IN BOOK 2339 PACE 516 OF
PARCEL C: ARE 685-600-010
THE EAST 13D FEET ETHE NORTH H NE -HALF OF E NOR.EAST ONE QUARTER OF .E SOIMIEASf ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST,

SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OR RMRSOE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO HE PU
T u HEREOF.

DETERMINED FROM RECORD DOCUMENT. CMITS OF LAND
5/5/I999 r0 0
DEtERMINEO !H aROER la PLOT)
UNITED 98 0
RE 10
CORDING TO 0 616. ON nrvu PARCEL MAP
+_MATCH Ex!ST

GRADING JECT

ADJACENT OWNER,
FER CCA 6°/'o TYPICAL SECTION 08020.

KEY LARGO (60' RIW)
PUB. STREET - NTS
.NDSAPE EA9EEMErvT

FROPOSIDD
BLOCK W.9.

Ifii NOI 0504111
PROPOSED oNCEsIDEWALKANOFRING sAlvarr LINE

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO -
685 -080-031, 685-080-010 685-030-006
ACREAGE:

ARE x42ACRES
-ZONING DATA:

EXISTING ZONING: Ft -L-2, R -M
PROPOSED ZONING: R -L-2, R -M
LAND USE:

EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT
PROPOSED NO USE. SINGLE FAMILY RESIOENBAL

FLOOD ZONE -
3033 X - FIRM MAP 06065C1595G,
(EFFECTIVE DATE AUGUST 28, 2008)
RASES OF RFARINGS:

E BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON

THE CENTERLINE OF KEY LARGO AVENUE PER
TRACT N0. 3 E 227, BEING N0010 04 PER
MB432/30
BENCHMARK:

M X50
ELEVATION'. 249.305 NAVD80
LOCATION: 2-150' BRASS DISK IN THE TOP OF
CURB AT THE LY .C.R.. OF THE

LY SOUTHWESTER CURB RETURN OF MONTEREY
AVENUE AND MARKET PLACE WAY.

OWNER:

GHA PALOMA GROUP IX, ur
30875 DATE PALM D
CATHEDRAL CM, CDRIVE, S4URE C2

PREPARED BY

FGMOTORENGINEERING
S S. CIVIC DRIVE, SUITE
15 CA 92262 PA
HONE: (760)-323-1842
FAX: (760)-323-1742
'1FTRACKS:

ET
-L-2 ZONE
FRONT 25 R.

REAR: 25 Fl.

SIDE. 10
STREET SIDE: 15 FT.

R-14 ZONE
FRONT: 20 FT.

REAR. 25 FT.

SID
SHEFETI SIDE: 15 R.

UTILITY PURVEYORS'

EL ORO IMPERIAL IRRIGAPON DISTRICT
GAS: HE GAS COMPANY/SQIPRA ENERGY CO
TELEPHONE: VERIZON COMPANY
WATER: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
CABLE: TIME WARNER CABLE
SEWER: COACHfllA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
SCHOOL DISTRICT:

PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED
PER CEO 5. We 2oG TYPICAL SECTION
VIA JOSEFINA (60' W W)

PUBLIC STREET - NTS
R/
(]60)396-5830
(909)335-7625
(]60)778-3603
(160)398-2651
(760)340-1312
(160)398-2651
EX ow
.T0. MEANDER.
coNo SIDEWALK
ExISTING COG
PREPARA1005 TO. 01/29/2024
PREPARED BY:

FOMOTOR ENGINEERING
00 225 SOUTH CIVIC DRIVE, SUITE 1-5 �jp*�
IN
PHONE. (TOO) 343-1842 '. gQ84
2 FAX: (760) 323-1742
FOR

ONLYREUIEWPURPOSES
or� j✓
H073
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET TTM 38041

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
C.0 1
4-540

VICTORY LANE
wR,rn.w. F„N,L�
LOT 1
PAD 326.0
It
LOT 6
PAD 323.0
LOT 14
PAD 317.8
LOT 5 u
PAD 325.7
-
LOT It
PAD 316.5
LOT 8
PAD 316.6
PAD 3181 I `.

I wies
LOT 13
PAD 316.8 I
I
LOT 15
PAD 318.5
LOT 16
PAD 319.0

OBTAIN DRAINAGE ALTERATION PERMISSION

LETTER FROMADJOININGPROPERTY OWNER
1 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
FOR
TRACT MAP 38041
NW 1/4 SEC. 30 T.4S, R.6E
SECTION B —B
LOT 7
PAD 317.8
SECTION D —D

SECEON PP
120.
118 8
PROP WEDGE CURB PROP wEDGE CUR
PROP P.C.
e+O4 04040E ONSITE PRIVATE STREET
SECTION A —A
E.aM.c cwcwo�
EMT

OMPACTED SUB GRADE
PA
SECCON C —C
SECTION E —E
SEC lN_F1—N
PREPARATION DATE: 01/29/2024
PREPARED BY:

FONOTOR ENGINEERING
225 SOUTH CIVIC DRIVE, SUCE 1-5
LM , (760) C3 92
PHONE 0) 2 313-1842
1142
FAR, (J60J 323-t]a2

FOR RENEW PURPOSES ONLY
PHILLIP %. 1031010R, ROB 47284

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TTM 38041

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
JN 200]?
SHEET
C.02
4-541

ATTACHMENT 11
Nay CANOPY

OWN OR AR AD
PrVOF N BLOCK

HIGH PROPOSED BLOCK WALL
L �ENiRY IuiiES
IIIIiR, .0 1
PAD ,31,.53
Oft HIGH PROPOSED BLOCK WALL.

IGH PROPOSED BLOC
3 SE
D 315.(
LOT 9
DAD 3,1
23352 sc
PAD 316.6
ALL

HIGH PROPOSED BLOCK WALL
LOT B

RETENTION BASIN
, - " 18;].11 SF
LOT

17.530 51
RROE,

DR OVED

RGO AVENUE

NA VAIL

PROJECT
StE

VICINITY MAP
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:

1.9.—CRIF.10, v... Ir.--1.

CHA PALOMa GROUP IX (IX

C/O MARIO GONZALEZ
P.O. BOX 10179
PALM DESERT. CA. 92255
MA RIG@GHACOMPANIES. COM
PREPARED BY:

P.A10,P TWDILENI:IC
22= ; 3C DRIVE, SL
OAK. 1,60) -323 -

PLANT LEGEND
rkn
s
e w rve ruc m. lw w
�}.Ji• _ rt • 133
®EL
IP
NA AL SOIL Roked)
OG 13/S" exlar Gray GuJ W Pock, , 3A 2311-.,
pY grin Eeo_ .>= 1' ro : (2 Pyars 1.31331 3.33 33.13.
h� n Ln-k- cwr. c c AOK

PRELIMINARY

SITE LANDSCAPE
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE. CALIFORNIA
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38041
NORTH
Ag
SO
GNI I=uturr I'
4-542

IBS
—E !t ICt• 8%8 DLOCS Pt IEIRS
,
i,
J
_ . • -. - �Ar -%Ii C Tr .-,, . .L
1 y
4 , . '. ��... ,. ' •� _ �. ;,.. :..yW. �/pI �+i
1 '.
� � "l1
F '� '
H PY5 WHIT` NT' 6#E'E
', t .0`1.11

E'E CAS
5t R AND f'N
LS k =-♦•,' f •5,. NE c
-1'1-N'.
oU I IICL _�-r Tl'PC
,TT METAL C
y'
rlcn II t (�r�ir
r;
.1
v. �• v.l
,r
r. -.,-
Er',. ,.. .�..\,
�'1lgr.—
B3 d
5�-!a"s«X�' 3J
-74, .- e�gl -sn
" ' ..F!£!g:�
;: II�
�.
-' �;

VIA JOSEFINA x ^ 119 AI1J;.•
1561661 65 5505 N4IAI. MAV C'.
iY GAL _7611 1
- I' P -t
AI.IA'�
rGA_
:��
:.
"
Y. ' e :-)),J;I:::!:17
Du .v aL0, = et RDA , ,LARIP
r . , Mevt •a lcN

MONUMENT SIGN VIA JOSEFINA
LIMI OF WORN 65 1, E, 3N= 13LOCK C r
zlt IC 9x8 RLO P 044 :; -,15,5,,E11.5 WnL
r Wait 8%9 WrYi� �A PJi MODERN PANTED tMA iE, r,IC/v
55 r:- I` ` •t'✓"
T.,_.. --;N),'
t 1 t. 9%F 0CL N 9A.055.,!(5,
t4rl N AINTEO
r. t,.-5;7
".`,\ , \I'f/'.
,.,-.-. �
At•`y�yl I f vV
Bit MIDI{ 6, MODERN DLDDK' WA C
E gat A PREOASi r
rAJJiED E COROREiE CAP
'+L Nc-
'.'IrP-:. 1
R'�y�: �
it �Fldli 8118 MdD€kN OLOdk WAu
I�AIN'I'c0'WHI WYTN A PRECAST
l'',iaD WHIiL CONCRETE OAP
m-sEaT - amovWS-
h.. .
. AVtia ��/ . f!1WW,,;:
rx Oi
I
I►it'°':.:

II I I
f-

I I I I
�.\ •+_.., ..
,
n., .; .. .i' ._ �i, r
�.�� •,�
.. ty`"Ri§`, en
f
,3 "I' ..., - a 61acYNl,
:; �t
y
. d Ate.

IY LARGO AVENUE KEY LARGO AVENUE

Oftq�' II 11#00041 /.J.1.
r
PMNTEO 110 OUNII'.P
61t HIGH BREEZE BLOCK
't. NT -ER ENOY WALL
PAINT -ER 40611110, TYPICAL
-r
- . . .1 -
i • _

KEY LARGO
AVENUE

PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE

PERIMETER ELEVATIONS
GM Future Designs
DATE;
Lrtd peD &n kes
2-1 24
(Cr/T
FU jU

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
I Q �
(
HEE •
a
r
ti
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38041
a `
or .,`%

L-2
_
I
4-543

N-ERLOC!.NC
- ,V- SR S
sen
Pala
Mull as
Harringbnno
PLAZA SOTNE: 3X9

ORCO PAVERS
ENTRY

MONUMENT
T'fPI..AI.

MODERN AGAVE IN LO,
MODERN SOUARE PG WF..S'
MODERN SLCC:N
COL'.;MNS

MONUMENT SIGN

ARCHITECTURAL

FOCAL POINT
' )TS

JOSEFINA

STRUCTURES
S FOR
N FEEL_
�6ft HIGH VEHICULAR

BLACK METAL ENTRY GATES
LOT 2
18,334 SF
PAD 325.3

ARCHITECTURAL BREEZE
BLOCK 12X12, SET ON
2FT 8X8 CMU BLOCK

PAINTED WHITE

PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE

MAIN ENTRY

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38041
GM Future Designs
L ,RARRpe Design Services
RO. B.5703
Le Quin, Calif ornra 92'248
cZaruCG, ,re9emyes. ro
=r, w.CM=:: wrilDRsgns.cor•
4-544

5f1 C- PRC)DOSFD 01 OCR WAI I
Q —
LOT 10
12,593 SF
PAD 315.7
LOT 9
12,778 SF
PAD 316.1
›-
ca
FU -U
RE
0 O
O
U
0 0
LOT B
RETENTION BASIN o
18,711 SF
LOT 12
12,058 SF
PAD 316.1
—PROPOSED 6FT WIDE

MEANDERING SIDEWALK WITH A
MEDIUM BROOM FINISH, 4" THICK
P.C.C. (POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE)
COLOR SHALL BE DAVIS CO.
"YOSEMITE BROWN OR APPROVED
EQUIVALENT.
60 MODERN BOCK
PRIVACY WA.L I.

KEY LARGO AVENUE
--Oft HIGH FMFRGENC

PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE

RETENTION BASIN

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38041
GM Future Design::

L ndscape DpDgri SR'kes
P. rw..,ra
le Quip, Ca"..A.a RYt49
vm w.CM=:::urcBeslgns. uar
01 DATE:
2-13-24
L-4
4-545

QL vn nunn�o�x�� L
Le {y Crushed Rock

1.1.8o12212,10 3001155.e
eraserE,
�� c P wxxe�,e o1 Pa�oa�ae
en, 51
znrid ono
V V 5 � ao 5b� Palm ie 1mI �re
(TA

MONUMENT
FUTURE E �n`PaaFOEINS�P
LeiAr.

DE S I G N Swc
WWLv. GMFu tureDes't]ns.cOAP
611 HI CH PROPOSED IS
LOT20.832
PAD 326.0
18334 SP
PAD 325..3
189'_32 SF
325.8
HIGH PRDPOSELI DLO. WALT.

BT s
PRO r5
AR WGH PROPOSED BLOOM. T.

LoFF Ls
12,593 SF
PAD 315.7
LOT 85 OF
PAD 31;.8
T 15
13,235 SF
PA.D 319.5
Eft HIGH PROPOSED BLOCK ALL
LOT B
RETENTION OASIS o
18,711 SF
13,033 SF
PhD 3133.

PAD 3185
DODO 5N° xMEDIUM BROOM FINISH
5)
06 APPao2F5re
WALL
hA TAIL PROJECT
cT C] T

VICINITY MAP
IL TS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:
685-080-031, 355-085-515, 685-0 iC-006
OWNER:

GHA PALOMA GROUP IX LLC
C/0 HARD GONZALEZ
P.O. BOX 10179
PALM DESERT. CA. 92255
MARIO®GHACOMPANIES.COW
PREPAF'EL1 BY:

POMOTOR RIJS
225 S. CIVIC 55,E, SUITE 1-5
PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262
E PHON (250.323-2232
FAX,- (1a0)-323-1)42

PLANT LECEND

OPMEATS
Low 24
Pow O gal Worpla
I I1S1 11ANRAL SOIL (1, 231
DG 3/8" - PewP T Cray Crush, PRO. 3 inches 081,4 on planters "n in (2 By 1 X23) Por
t elan

ALUMINUM

PRELIMINARY

SITE LANDSCAPE

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38041
NORTH
40'
90'
lad
SCALE:

GM Future Designs
Landscape Destgn Services
P.O sox 5703
Laws, CaBfons89224
l'Era 4,4,315-2423
DATE;
2-19-24
SHEET
L-1
4-546

LINT HE ZADF1
—6 5ft HIGH 9X8 BLOCI( PILASTERS
'f
i ~
qq 5 H 9H8 9L C IL TER. 5ft BREEZE BLOCK
D TE r fl HICH WROUGHT IRON
YJITH EX� WHITE NTtp MCcDEPN
BLOCK AND PP.ECASi CONCRETE ;AP
fi a A M DLRII R 0 rtiALL
PI IIJ TE WHITE Y FRE'p.ST
P..
�JIT tl.$ NH TE P TD C P01 TRA IBPARENC Al .L
BLC ,'. PREC ,-,-,N PETE CAP PAINTED WHITETREGAL— TRANSPARENCY CT FEr ICE I
NTFD uVHITE �JNCRETE OAF
pESERT STREET FAIN,' TREES
AND
Eft H. VEHICULAR T'PICA
LIk)'1�11
I �.
) IV ll
"Ir. Ill
l)
©ATE PAID#5

TVRICQL

METAL EN AU VARY

TTPIC CATES

EAU VARY
r7PICAL
I)1141
�I � 1 1
.. o••.'�..
j.

VIA JOSEFINA

ILRN ADIACCNT
ERLOCKING SIDEW'ALh

ACCENT PAVING
SC,,LE: I = 10'-0'
TVPICPL Eft HIGH METAL MATVPIC_ALN GATE
6ff HIYt BPEE'LE BLOCK LIMIT OF WORK —,
GATE AP4LML
-,- T a C 1R{r3
Se
to

DENERT STREET
TtPICQL
1 X tm_
5ft HIGH BLOCK WALL
WITH P OCER{ BT➢CI '
i�► - aw -
;,11.. .
tylf,_"
yy
_lii_
6f1 HIrH

PAINTED

PAINTED
-
��
1 ANN MODER

WHITE WITH
.117E CONCRETE
Jv
I

NERD WALL
A PRE A_
F.

SF�T STREET T F CAI
let uav TPiEEs

:v_
_
.. .
... . .."
! 6f
:..-. .. _:u ....:svz:u.ve_..zla�.u„ ... �_.

. ... .:: . �..v�+s...3�...nuK..e �a ..
.......,u
I .. .F_ _ .::.._� ...lu �esva!°s�vu.ece ..: 'tea... �......_- ..

C
C �
_ 4. . zu.aalar.Ix.
. . L 'S. •, S !4 T ...
s....nux�_.lsa--�... .._<a ...._,.:-
C S .i
',.a.. :x:..ez�c�..a .. .s....
',
.. _..._ , !s ... .:mom .......
...
..
... ...eas..aes�,:

5.. W.1,., I
,. .. ..a x
•..

KEY LARGO AVENUE

KEY LARGO AVENUE
SCALE: 1" _ I V-0"
SCALE: 'I" = 10'—G"
6 I HI H ANN MODERN. BLOCK

FAINTED NHITE WITH A PRECAST
peIIJTEr WH TE JUGPETE Cqp
1A
y
u
WALL—
Z' r
�=
.fir
Eft HICH BREEZE BLOCK
TRANSPARENGr WALL

PAINTED WHITE, TYRIG,
DESERT STREET CAI. AF TREES
tP ICAL
.� Vr�
L AR

MET L FIRE, NATE,
5 J TYPE',
pESERT
STR€ET CANGPY TREES
'PATE
Q
pESERT
Ni,y�
Fr
err ` .R
STREET CaNOPv TREES—
Tt Irtl
t
('t�4y�
LI
.RN HIGH HXS MbCERIJ BLOCK ALL

PAINTED WHITE WITH A PREG,AST
PAINTED WHITE CONCRETE CAP S.Sft
WITH
BLOK
�(.y�

LIMIT OF N
HIGH NYS BLCI� PILASTERS
&%8 WHITE P INTED MODERN

AND PREGAS CON,,FETE CAP
aw �,� �
s
s
i
YY
111'1.. rs
J�1M11!
!
!�1 '..
[

pyi.
,
. c. "v :; ..cafi:e� _e ..
.._ - .::: _ •s ..a"aa.,' '
, : .. :,._ '.. s:'sa .,.., .._I
�
,. _, F .... . .. .
, ... it .1a..:..:.. .. .._
.:
_. _._ _...d.. ? .=
x: . .
— pu._re ..
'. __?..�.—.z .._... .. =.—_-

KEY LARGO AVENUE
SCALE: I" = 10'-0"
t

J PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE

PERIMETER ELEVATIONS
GM Future Designs
D"
Landscape Design Services
2-19.24

FUTURE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
(RV!
PO Bar 5703
o szz�e
ITa a
SHEET*
E 5 I G N Swc TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38041
M a
cr
L-2
NNNt°
www: GM Fu tureDes (]n5'Orn
4-547

6htr .0n1
Runner
PLAZA SGTNE. ANN

ORCO PAVERS
—ten,

IN I KRLOCKIN G
PAVERS
ENTRY

MONUMENT

DATE APALM

MODERN AGAVE IN LOW -N

MODERN SOUARE BOWLS
MODERN BLOT —GALL
IC BOA

COLUMNS LMONUMENT SIGN

MONUMENT SIGN

ARCHITECTURAL

FOCAL POINT
FUTURE
DE S I G N Swc
„WW.GMEu [ureDesHns.0-am

JOSEFINA
1 J

ARCHITECTURAL PATTERN
ERR PLOD..

PAINTED WHITE
0s
10" 10.5
BLACK METAL SHADEI STRUCTURE~

TO MATCH ENTRY GATES FOR

A HARMONIOUS MODERN FEEL
N
LOT 2
18,334
PAD 1 7

ARC HITEI TURAL BREEZE PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE
HLUCG '12V1 2, ET ON
LET 8x8 CMU BLolit MAIN ENTRY

PAINTED WHITE

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38041
60 HIGH VEHICULAR

BLACK METAL ENTRY GATES
NORTH
o to'
40'
SCALE:

GM Future Designs
Landscape Design Services
P.O. Sox 5703
La QUI., California 92248
1" = IV -0"
DATE:
2-19-24
SHEET
L-3
4-548

PROPOSED EFT WIDE

MEANDERING SIDEWALK WITH A
MEDIUM BROOM FINISH, 4" THICK
P .C. (POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE
COLOR SHALL BE DAIN CO.
"'rDEEMITE BROWN OR APPROVED
EQUIMALENT.

Eft HIGH PROPOSED BLOCK BALL ti
LOT 'I 1
15,019 SF
PAD 316.5
LOT 10
12,593 SF
PAD 315.7
LOT 9
12,778 SF
PAD 316.1
FUTURE
DE S I G N Swc
WPM:. GM Fu lu reDes dE FS.:pm
LOT B
RETENTION BASIN 0
18,711 SF
LOT 12
12,058 SF
PAD 316.1
— 6ft MODERII BLOCK

PRI JAC I WALL

LARGO AVENUE
>-
w
6'ft HIGH EMERGENC-�.

NETAL ENTPN GATES

DROUGHT

TOLERANT

LANDSCAPING
3,/B" - Pewter Gros Crushed Roch

PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE

RETENTION BASIN

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38041
NORTH
0 20' 40'
80'
SCALE:

GM Future Designs
Landscape Desgn Services
P.O. Box X03
is Quota. Cadforma 92248
DATE;
2-19-24
SHEET
L-4
4-549

ATTACHMENT 12

VIA JOSEFINA
R -L-2
R -M
R -L-2
{

PROJECT SITE
R -M

KEY LARGO AVE
1 OS/PP o

EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
•
Existing Zoning: R -L.-2
4" 4
Existing Zoning: R-11
GV-u : uwuo7 pasod
a
4 •
M
4 or
Exhibit 6 Exiistdng and Proposed Land Use Designations
s
•
Map Features
1'tojccl sac
0 75 150 it
i i 1
•1
SOURCE: CITY QF RARCIHO MIRAGE Also FoJ omr Engineering. 4-550

Rancho Mirage City CouncilOctober 3, 2024

Rancho Mirage City Council
October 3, 2024