Mayor Weill
Mayor Pro Tem Mallotto
Council Member Downs
Council Member Fromberg Edelstein
Council Member O'Keefe
Thursday, September 4, 2025, 1:00 PM
City Council Chamber
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
REGULAR MEETING OF THE RANCHO MIRAGE CITY COUNCIL
AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, ENERGY AUTHORITY,
HOUSING AUTHORITY, JOINT POWERS FINANCE AUTHORITY, LIBRARY
AND OBSERVATORY, AND REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARDS AGENDA
1.GENERAL
1.A. Call to Order
1.B. Flag Salute
1.C. Roll Call: Downs, Fromberg Edelstein, O'Keefe, Mallotto, Weill
2.PRESENTATIONS
2.A. Hidden Harvest Presentation
3.COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS/REPORTS
4.CITY MANAGER COMMENTS/REPORTS
5.CONSENT CALENDAR
5.A. Waive Full Reading of Any Ordinance Introduced or Adopted Pursuant to this Agenda
5.B. Zoning Text Amendment Case No. ZTA25-0002 – Applicant: City of Rancho Mirage. Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.30 (Standards for Specific Land Uses) – Section 17.30.270 D. Penalty of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 1225, 2nd Reading, 1) Finding Adoption of this Ordinance Exempt from CEQA; and 2) Amending Section 17.30.270 (Short-Term Rentals), Subpart “D” (Penalty) of Chapter 17.30 (General Property and Use Standards) of Title 17 (“Zoning”) of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, Revising the Fine Schedule to Incorporate a Tier Based Penalty Fee Schedule.
5.C. July 17, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the July 17, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes as presented.
5.D. Appointment to the Rancho Mirage Mobilehome Fair Practices Commission — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Appoint Wallace Hill to serve as a member of the Rancho Mirage Mobilehome Fair Practices Commission for the remainder of the current term. 1 5.E. Authorization of Opioid Settlement Agreements with Purdue/Sackler and Approval and Execution of Future Opioid Settlement Agreements
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into the Settlement Agreements with the Purdue/Sackler Settlement, Agreeing to the Terms of the California State-Subdivision Agreement, and Authorizing the City Manager to Approve and Execute Future Proposed Opioid Settlement Agreements.
5.F. Rancho Mirage Energy Authority (RMEA) 2024 Power Source Disclosure Attestation — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve providing attestation for Rancho Mirage Energy Authority's 2024 Power Source Disclosure (PSD) Annual Report as specified under California’s PSD Program.
5.G. Authorization for the City Manager to Procure Six (6) Level III DC Fast Charging Units — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to procure six (6) Level III DC Fast Charging Units at a not-to-exceed cost of $50,000 per unit, and to take all necessary actions to secure Southern California Edison (SCE) Charge Ready funding, implement required utility upgrades, and complete installation at City facilities.
5.H. Amended Recognized Obligations Payment Schedule (ROPS) for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-SA-(Next-in-Order), Approving and Adopting an Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for January 1, 2026, through June 30, 2026, Pursuant to Assembly Bills 26x1 and 1484.
5.I. Updated Calendar Year 2025 Salary Schedule
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Approving the Updated Calendar Year 2025 Salary Schedule to Comply with California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS) Statutory and Regulatory Requirements for Compensation Earnable and Publicly Available Pay Schedules.
5.J. Quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2025 — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and File the June 30, 2025, Quarterly Treasurer’s Report as presented.
5.K. Contracts
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the terms of the contracts as presented and authorize the City Manager to execute the subject contracts.
5.L. Demands
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the demands as presented.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.A. Resolution Amending the Vehicle Impound Cost Recovery Fee and Adopting a DUI/Vehicle Impound Cost Recovery Fee
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Amending the Vehicle Impound Cost Recovery Fee and Adopting a DUI/Vehicle Impound Cost Recovery Fee.
7. ACTION CALENDAR
2 7.A. Annexation No. 199 to Community Facilities District No. 1 (in Connection with Tentative Parcel Map No. 38844, Owner: Advanced Health Care). Location: Northeast Corner of the Intersection of Bob Hope Drive and Gerald Ford Drive
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Declaring the City’s Intention to Annex Territory to Community Facilities District No. 1 and to Levy a Special Tax therein for Additional Police and Fire Services, Preliminarily Approve a Map of the Area Proposed to be Annexed, and Schedule a Public Hearing to Consider the Annexation and the Levy of the Special Tax for Annexation No. 199.
7.B. Annexation No. 200 to Community Facilities District No. 1 (in Connection with Tentative Tract Map No. 38990, Owner: EC Rancho Mirage Holding GP Corp.). Location: Cotino Project - Section 31, Approximately 650 Feet South from the Intersection of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive, on the West Side of Monterey Avenue
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Declaring the City’s Intention to Annex Territory to Community Facilities District No. 1 and to Levy a Special Tax therein for Additional Police and Fire Services, Preliminarily Approve a Map of the Area Proposed to be Annexed, and Schedule a Public Hearing to Consider the Annexation and the Levy of the Special Tax for Annexation No. 200.
8. NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS
An opportunity for the public to speak on issues not on the agenda for a maximum of three (3) minutes per speaker.
9. CLOSED SESSION
9.A. Closed Session Agenda
— 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISITING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d) (1). Case Name: Ricky Martinez v. City of Rancho Mirage. Case No.: CVPS2503449.
9.B. Recess to Closed Session
9.C. Reconvene Open Session
9.D. Closed Session Announcements
10. ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC NOTICES
Agenda Materials: Any staff reports for agenda items considered in open session, as well as agenda materials for open session items provided to a majority of the legislative body(ies) following distribution of the agenda, are available for inspection in the City Clerk’s Office at Rancho Mirage City Hall, located at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270, during normal business hours.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to the ADA, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (760) 324-4511 Ext. 488, or via e-mail to [email protected], prior to the meeting. Providing notice at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting is suggested, so a determination may be made as to whether the request is feasible.
Livestream: This meeting may be viewed via Livestream on the City’s website at www.RanchoMirageCA.gov . 3 Public Comments: Written public comments may be submitted to the City Clerk via email to [email protected] or mail/delivery to ATTN: City Clerk, City of Rancho Mirage, 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. Please submit written public comments at least three (3) hours in advance of the meeting to ensure they may be fully considered. Written public comments received during the meeting will be distributed to the legislative body(ies) and made available to the public following the meeting.
Oral public comments/testimony may be provided in person at the meeting during the non-agenda public comment period and during the public comment/testimony period for each agenda item. Public comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. Please fill out a Request to Speak slip prior to the start of the meeting and submit it to the City Clerk. You will be called upon to speak at the appropriate time. Please submit a separate slip for each item on which you wish to speak.
Declaration of Posting: I, Kristie Ramos, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Mirage, do hereby declare that the foregoing meeting agenda was posted on the City of Rancho Mirage website at www.RanchoMirageCA.gov , on the Rancho Mirage City Hall bulletin board at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270, and at the Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory at 71-100 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Date Posted: August 29, 2025
4 City Council Staff Report
Zoning Text Amendment Case No. ZTA25-0002 – Applicant: City of Rancho Mirage. Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.30 (Standards for Specific Land Uses) – Section 17.30.270 D. Penalty of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5B.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Ordinance No. 1225, 2nd Reading, 1) Finding Adoption of this Ordinance Exempt from CEQA; and 2) Amending Section 17.30.270 (Short-Term Rentals), Subpart “D” (Penalty) of Chapter 17.30 (General Property and Use Standards) of Title 17 (“Zoning”) of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, Revising the Fine Schedule to Incorporate a Tier Based Penalty Fee Schedule.
DISCUSSION
Ordinance No. 1225 was introduced (1st reading) on July 17, 2025.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Draft Ordinance
5 ORDINANCE NO. 1225
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA, 1) FINDING ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CEQA; AND 2) AMENDING SECTION 17.30.270 (SHORT-TERM RENTALS), SUBPART “D” (PENALTY) OF CHAPTER 17.30 (GENERAL PROPERTY AND USE STANDARDS) OF TITLE 17 (“ZONING”) OF THE RANCHO MIRAGE MUNICIPAL CODE, REVISING THE
FINE SCHEDULE TO INCORPORATE A TIER BASED PENALTY FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Mirage (“City”) is a charter city and a municipal corporation of the State of California, and recognized as a political subdivision of State of California for certain purpose; and
WHEREAS, all short-term rentals are currently banned from operating and/or advertising in the City of Rancho Mirage pursuant to Ordinance No. 1189 which was approved and adopted by the City Council on October 21, 2021. This prohibition does not include rentals of units located within city-approved hotels or other similar lodging facilities. Short-term rentals are defined as a dwelling unit, whole or in part that is rented for twenty-seven (27) consecutive calendar days or less; and WHEREAS, the City desires to incorporate a tier-based schedule of fines to address the nature and extent of the underlying offense and the harm caused by violations; and
WHEREAS, charter cities may enact an ordinance that provides for penalties that differ from any statutory penalties as long as such penalties do not exceed any maximum limits set by its charter (County of Los Angeles v City of Los Angeles (1963) 219 CA2d 838, 844); and
WHEREAS, the proposed Ordinance does not regulate the uses of land and structures, or amend any such prior established regulations, and instead only establishes a Schedule of Fines to be established by Resolution, and is therefore outside the purview of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378 because it is not a “project”, and 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment because the amendments involve general policy and procedure making.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ATTACHMENT 1
6 Section 1. RECITALS AND EXHIBITS
That the above Recitals and attached Exhibits are true and correct and are incorporated as though fully set forth herein.
Section 2. EVIDENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
That the City Council conducted a noticed Public Hearing on July 17, 2025, and considered all of the evidence submitted into the administrative record for the proposed Ordinance, including, but not limited to, the following, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference:
(a)Rancho Mirage Municipal Code;
(b)Rancho Mirage General Plan and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code and all relevant provisions contained therein; (c)Notice of City Council Public Hearing scheduled for July 17, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, located at City Hall at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California;
(d)City Council Staff Report, attachments and Staff presentation for the proposed Ordinance, and all public documents, records and references related thereto submitted or provided at or prior to the July 17, 2025, City Council Public Hearing; and
(e)Testimony and/or comments from all persons that were provided in written format or correspondence, at, or prior to, the July 17, 2025, City Council Public Hearing.
Section 3. FINDINGS
That the City Council finds that all proposed zoning text amendments herein are consistent with the General plan upon consideration of all of its aspects, including without limitation that the proposed amendments further the objectives and policies of the General Plan and do not obstruct their attainment.
Section 4. AMENDING SECTION 17.30.270 SHORT-TERM RENTALS) OF CHAPTER 17.30 (GENERAL PROPERTY AND USE
STANDARDS) OF TITLE 17 (“ZONING”) OF THE RANCHO
MIRAGE MUNICIPAL CODE
That Section 17.30.270 (Short-Term Rentals) of Chapter 17.30 (General Property and Use Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the City of Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, is hereby amended as set forth in more detail on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
7 Section 5. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
That the City Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15378 because it is not a “project”, and 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment because the amendments involve general policy and procedure making.
Section 6. CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW
That the City Attorney prepared and framed this Ordinance pursuant to Section
1.04.010 of the Municipal Code and finds that the City Council has the authority to adopt this Ordinance, that the Ordinance is constitutionally valid and that the Ordinance is consistent with the general powers and purposes of the City as set forth in Section
1.04.031 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code.
Section 7. SEVERABILITY
That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Ordinance as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 8. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
That all the provisions of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code as heretofore adopted by the City that are in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 9. AMENDING OF BAIL SCHEDULE
That the City Attorney's Office is hereby directed to determine whether this Ordinance necessitates amendment of the City's Bail Schedule and to cause such necessary amendments to be made and filed with the local branches of the Superior Court of the County of Riverside.
Section 10. EFFECTIVE DATE
That this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its second reading.
Section 11. CERTIFICATION
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance, and cause it to be published as required by law.
8 The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on September 4, 2025, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
_______________________________
Ted Weill, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Colin Kirkpatrick, City Attorney
9 EXHIBIT “A”
AMENDING SECTION 17.30.270 (SHORT-TERM RENTALS), SUBPART “D” (PENALTY) OF CHAPTER 17.31 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES) OF TITLE 17 (“ZONING”) OF THE RANCHO MIRAGE MUNICIPAL CODE §17.30.270 Short-term rentals.
A.Definition. "Short-term rental" means a dwelling unit, in whole or in part, rented for a period of twenty-seven consecutive calendar days or less, for transient dwelling, lodging, sleeping, or special event purposes, regardless of home-sharing or subletting arrangements. For the purposes of this section, rentals in exchange for non-monetary forms of compensation shall also qualify a dwelling unit as a short-term rental. Rentals of units located within city-approved hotels, motels, time-shares, and bed and breakfasts shall not be considered short-term rentals.
B.Prohibition. Operation of short-term rentals is prohibited in every zone of the city.
Operation of a short-term rental includes advertising, offering for rent, or agreeing to rent, a short-term rental, regardless of whether a person actually occupies the short- term rental. Each such action, and each day such operation persists, is a separate violation of this section.
C.Exception. Short-term rental certificates issued for 2021 shall not expire until June 30, 2022. Certificate holders for 2021 must abide by all rules and regulations applicable under the code as it read at the time the certificate was issued, and such certificates may be revoked or suspended for any reason set forth in the code at the time the certificate was issued.
D.Penalty. The city may issue an administrative citation to any occupant, responsible party, owner(s), or the owner's authorized agent or representative, pursuant to Chapter 14.80 (Administrative Citation and Appeal Procedures) of this code for any violation of this section committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. Each day the violation persists shall constitute a separate violation. Unless otherwise provided herein, any person issued an administrative citation pursuant to this chapter shall for each separate violation be subject to the following fines set forth in the schedule of fines established by resolution of the city council and otherwise permitted by applicable law: (1) an administrative fine in an amount not to exceed five thousand dollars for the first citation; and (2) a fine in an amount not to exceed ten thousand dollars for a second and any subsequent citation issued for the same offense within a twelve-month period of the date of the first offense.
10 City Council Staff Report
July 17, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5C.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the July 17, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes as presented.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Draft 07-17-2025 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 11 Mayor Weill
Mayor Pro Tem Mallotto
Council Member Downs
Council Member Fromberg Edelstein
Council Member O'Keefe
REGULAR MEETING OF THE RANCHO MIRAGE CITY COUNCIL
AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, ENERGY AUTHORITY,
HOUSING AUTHORITY, JOINT POWERS FINANCE AUTHORITY, LIBRARY
AND OBSERVATORY, AND REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARDS 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Thursday, July 17, 2025, 1:00 PM
DRAFT MINUTES
1.GENERAL
1.A. Call to Order
Mayor Weill called the meeting to order at 1:00 P.M.
1.B. Flag Salute
Ryan Stendell, Assistant City Manager, led the flag salute.
1.C. Roll Call: Downs, Fromberg Edelstein, O'Keefe, Mallotto, Weill All members were present.
2.PRESENTATIONS
2.A. Special Presentation to Rancho Mirage High School Women’s Softball State Finalist Team Mayor Weill provided highlights of the Rancho Mirage High School Women's Softball team's successful season, presented a related video, and announced a gift of championship rings.
Dr. Marcus Funchess, Palm Springs Unified School District Superintendent, thanked the City and introduced coach Eddie Martinez, who also expressed gratitude and provided additional details regarding the team.
Mayor Weill presented a proclamation honoring the softball team, coaches, and staff.
2.B. Palm Springs International Airport Commission Update Dr. Keith Young, Palm Springs International Airport Commissioner, provided an update on the Palm Springs International Airport and answered Council questions.
3.COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS/REPORTS
The following individual provided public comments: Brad Anderson.
ATTACHMENT 1
12 Council Member Fromberg Edelstein spoke in favor of the expansion of Palm Springs International Airport and commended the Rancho Mirage Rattler Softball Team. She also noted her attendance at a recent Rancho Mirage Chamber of Commerce Speaker Series event, which highlighted the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, and spoke regarding the historical relationship between the City and the Tribe.
Council Member O'Keefe spoke regarding the City's commitment to maintaining safe roadways and highlighted upcoming road projects. He also expressed gratitude to Assemblymember Greg Wallis for hosting a free Senior Scam Awareness Seminar.
Council Member Downs commended the Rattlers Softball Team. He explained why closed session was conducted privately and why action minutes were acceptable. He also addressed the ratio of Sheriff’s Deputies to residents and commented on a former resident who frequently requested to return to City Housing Authority housing after being lawfully evicted.
Mayor Pro Tem Mallotto expressed gratitude for the City's relationship with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, noted her attendance at the 2025 Riverside Sheriffs' Association Awards Banquet, and expressed appreciation of the City's law enforcement personnel.
Mayor Weill expressed appreciation of the City's public safety personnel.
4.CITY MANAGER COMMENTS/REPORTS
None.
5.CONSENT CALENDAR (A-I)
Ryan Stendell, Assistant City Manager, presented the Consent Calendar Items.
The following individual provided non-agenda public comments: Brad Anderson.
MOVED/SECONDED BY DOWNS/FROMBERG EDELSTEIN TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
5.A. Waive Full Reading of Any Ordinance Introduced or Adopted Pursuant to this Agenda-
5.B. June 18, 2025, Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the June 18, 2025, Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting Minutes as presented.
5.C. Appointment to the Rancho Mirage Community Parks and Trails Commission- — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Appoint Joshua Oransky to serve as a member of the Rancho Mirage Community Parks and Trails Commission for the remainder of the current term.
5.D. Annual Appointments of City Council Representatives to Various Outside Agency Boards, Committees, and Commissions-
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Confirm the annual appointments of City Council representatives to various outside agency boards, committees, and commissions as presented.
5.E. Final Acceptance of Improvements for Parcel Map No. 38380 (Sanctuary)- — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept the public and private improvements for Parcel Map No. 38380 as completed and authorize the filing of the Notice of Acceptance and the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder’s Office. 13 5.F. Consideration of Transitioning to Electric Vehicles- — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the transition of the City fleet to electric vehicles and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to take all necessary actions to implement this transition, including but not limited to issuing Requests for Proposals, vendor selection, approving purchases, surplus of old fleet vehicles and executing all associated agreements and documents, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.
5.G. Donation of Surplus Automated License Plate Recognition Equipment- — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Authorizing the Donation of Surplus Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Equipment to the City of Riverside Police Department.
5.H. Contracts-
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the terms of the contracts as presented and authorize the City Manager to execute the subject contracts.
5.I. Demands-
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the demands as presented.
6.PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.A. Zoning Text Amendment Case No. ZTA25-0002 – Applicant: City of Rancho Mirage. Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.30 (Standards for Specific Land Uses) – Section 17.30.270 D. Penalty of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code and Resolution Incorporating a Tier Based Penalty Fee Schedule. Location: City- Wide
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Find that the adoption of the Ordinance has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines, and that adoption of the Ordinance is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378 because it is not a “project”, and 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment because the amendments involve general policy and procedure making; 2) Introduce Ordinance No. (Next-in-Order), 1st Reading, Amending Chapter 17.30 (Standards for Specific Land Uses) – Section 17.30.270 D. Penalty of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Adopting a Tier-Based Schedule of Fines Regarding Violation of Short-Term Rental Regulations.
Pam Birky, Code Compliance Manager, presented the staff report.
The following individual provided public testimony: Brad Anderson.
A discussion ensued.
MOVED/SECONDED BY DOWNS/O’KEEFE TO: 1) FIND THAT THE ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE HAS BEEN
REVIEWED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND CEQA GUIDELINES, AND THAT ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT
FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15378 BECAUSE IT IS NOT A “PROJECT”, AND 15061(B)(3)
BECAUSE IT CAN BE SEEN WITH CERTAINTY THAT THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY THAT THE ACTIVITY IN
QUESTION MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT BECAUSE THE AMENDMENTS INVOLVE GENERAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE MAKING; 2) INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 1225, 1ST READING, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.30 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES) – SECTION 17.30.270 D. PENALTY OF THE RANCHO MIRAGE MUNICIPAL CODE; AND 3) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2025-30, ADOPTING A TIER-BASED SCHEDULE OF FINES REGARDING VIOLATION OF SHORT-TERM RENTAL REGULATIONS. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
14 6.B. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA25-0002 and Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP25-0002 - Rancho Mirage Affordable Apartments. Applicant: National Community Renaissance. Consideration of an Affordable Housing Development, Rancho Mirage Affordable Apartments, Consisting of 150 Units Distributed Across Seven (7) Two- and Three-Story Walk-up Buildings. Located South of Via Vail and East of Key Largo Avenue (APN: 685-090-016)
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Adopting and Approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH#2025050959) for the Proposed Project Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA25-0002; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Approving Preliminary Development Plan Case No. PDP25-0002 Regarding the Proposed Rancho Mirage Affordable Apartments; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Approving a Development Impact Fee Deferral Agreement in Support of National Community Renaissance of California’s Development of Affordable Housing in the City of Rancho Mirage on Real Property Having Assessors Parcel Number 685-090-016, and Authorizing the City Manager to Take All Related Actions Necessary to Negotiate, Prepare, and Execute the Necessary Agreements and Other Documents Necessary to Effectuate the Same and Finding the Action Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.
Majna Dukic, Director of Development Services, presented the staff report.
Taylor Libolt Varner, National CORE representative, provided an overview of the project and answered Council questions.
The following individuals provided public testimony: Brad Anderson and James Brownyard (Rancho Mirage Chamber of Commerce representative).
A discussion ensued.
MOVED/SECONDED BY MALLOTTO/DOWNS TO: 1) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2025-31, ADOPTING AND
APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH#2025050959) FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CASE NO. EA25-0002; 2) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2025-32, APPROVING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CASE NO. PDP25-0002 REGARDING THE PROPOSED RANCHO MIRAGE AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS; AND 3) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2025-33, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRAL AGREEMENT IN SUPPORT OF NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA’S DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE ON REAL PROPERTY HAVING ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 685- 090-016, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL RELATED ACTIONS NECESSARY TO
NEGOTIATE, PREPARE, AND EXECUTE THE NECESSARY AGREEMENTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE SAME AND FINDING THE ACTION EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
7.ACTION CALENDAR
7.A. Construction Agreement for Rancho Mirage Community Park Expansion — RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guidelines §15061(b)(3), §15304 (Class 4) and §15332 (Class 32); and 2) Approve a Construction Agreement with Asphalt Fabric, in an amount not to exceed $2,852,282.30, for the expansion of the Rancho Mirage Community Park (CP22-378).
Ryan Stendell, Assistant City Manager, presented the staff report.
The following individual provided public comments: Brad Anderson.
MOVED/SECONDED BY O’KEEFE/MALLOTTO TO: 1) FIND THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO GUIDELINES §15061(B)(3), §15304 (CLASS 4) AND §15332 (CLASS 32); 2) CONSENT TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF BID FROM ASPHALT FABRIC & ENGINEERING, INC.
AS COMPLYING WITH PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 5103; AND 3) APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION15
AGREEMENT WITH THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,430,057.39 FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE RANCHO MIRAGE COMMUNITY PARK (CP22-378).
FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN FY 25/26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGET. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
7.B. Riverside County Sheriff Services Contract Amendment — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Third Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services Between the City of Rancho Mirage and the County of Riverside.
Tyler Fowlkes, Senior Management Analyst, presented the staff report.
Sheriff's Lieutenant Chris Ternes described law enforcement efforts resulting in a significant decline in crime rates in the City of Rancho Mirage.
The following individuals provided public comments: Brad Anderson and Wally Melendez.
A discussion ensued.
MOVED/SECONDED BY MALLOTTO/FROMBERG EDELSTEIN TO APPROVE THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
7.C. Shop Local Rancho Mirage Gift Card Program Proposed Bonus Campaign for Taste of Summer Rancho Mirage
— RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve implementation of a Shop Local Rancho Mirage Gift Card Bonus Program to coincide with Taste of Summer Rancho Mirage, July 24–August 17, 2025, utilizing a $25,000 bonus fund to provide a 50% match incentive on gift card purchases.
Gabe Codding, Director of Marketing, presented the staff report.
A discussion ensued.
MOVED/SECONDED BY DOWNS/FROMBERG EDELSTEIN TO APPROVE IMPLEMENTATION OF A SHOP LOCAL
RANCHO MIRAGE GIFT CARD BONUS PROGRAM TO COINCIDE WITH TASTE OF SUMMER RANCHO MIRAGE, JULY 24–AUGUST 17, 2025, UTILIZING A $25,000 BONUS FUND TO PROVIDE A 50% MATCH INCENTIVE ON GIFT CARD PURCHASES. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
7.D. Economic Development Shop Local Resort Partnership Program — RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the implementation of an Economic Development Shop Local Resort Partnership Program and authorize the allocation of $65,000 to support occupancy incentives at Rancho Mirage resorts during the September–October 2025 shoulder season.
Gabe Codding, Director of Marketing, presented the staff report.
Mayor Weill recessed the meeting at 3:14 P.M. for a short break. He reconvened the meeting at 3:19 P.M.
A discussion ensued.
MOVED/SECONDED BY FROMBERG EDELSTEIN/O’KEEFE TO APPROVE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SHOP LOCAL RESORT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE THE ALLOCATION OF $65,000 TO SUPPORT OCCUPANCY INCENTIVES AT RANCHO MIRAGE RESORTS DURING THE SEPTEMBER–OCTOBER 2025 SHOULDER SEASON. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
8.NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following individuals provided non-agenda public comments: Deborah Miller, Kimberly McKinny (Guide Dogs of the Desert representative), Brad Anderson, and Wally Melendez.16
9.CLOSED SESSION
9.A. Closed Session Agenda
— 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957. Public Employee: City Clerk/Board Secretary. — 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR REGARDING UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957. City Representative: Colin D. Kirkpatrick, City Attorney. Unrepresented Employee: City Clerk/Board Secretary.
Colin Kirkpatrick, City Attorney, summarized the Closed Session Agenda, reporting that the City Council would meet in closed session to confer with legal counsel regarding one public employee performance evaluation item, pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957, related to the City Clerk/Board Secretary, and to confer with the labor negotiator regarding one unrepresented employee item, pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957, related to the City Clerk/Board Secretary.
The following individual provided public comments: Brad Anderson.
9.B. Recess to Closed Session
Mayor Weill recessed the meeting to Closed Session at 3:44 P.M.
9.C. Reconvene Open Session
Mayor Weill reconvened the meeting at 5:00 P.M., with all members present.
9.D. Closed Session Announcements
Colin Kirkpatrick, City Attorney, announced that no reportable action was taken during Closed Session.
10.ACTION CALENDAR CONTINUED
10.A. Consider Approving Any Proposed Revisions to City Clerk/Board Secretary Employment Agreement The following individual provided public comments: Brad Anderson.
Colin Kirkpatrick, City Attorney, reported that before the Council was a proposed amendment to the City Clerk's employment contract, which increased her base salary to $148,500, raised her Health Savings Account to the IRS maximum, and aligned her holiday schedule with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of the Rancho Mirage Employees' Association.
MOVED/SECONDED BY MALLOTTO/DOWNS TO AMEND THE CITY CLERK’S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT TO INCREASE HER BASE SALARY TO $148,500, RAISE HER HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT TO THE IRS MAXIMUM,
AND ALIGN HER HOLIDAY SCHEDULE WITH THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) OF THE RANCHO MIRAGE EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
11.ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Weill adjourned the meeting at 5:03 P.M.
Date Approved by City Council:17
City Council Staff Report
Appointment to the Rancho Mirage Mobilehome Fair Practices Commission
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5D.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Appoint Wallace Hill to serve as a member of the Rancho Mirage Mobilehome Fair Practices Commission for the remainder of the current term.
DISCUSSION
There is currently a vacancy on the Rancho Mirage Mobilehome Fair Practices Commission, for nomination by Mayor Pro Tem Mallotto. Mayor Pro Tem Mallotto is nominating Wallace Hill to serve as a member of the Mobilehome Fair Practices Commission for the remainder of the current term, which ends on June 1, 2026. This nomination requires ratification by the Rancho Mirage City Council. A copy of Mr. Hill’s application is attached.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Commission Application
18 ATTACHMENT 1CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
69-825 Highway 111 , Rancho Mirage , CA 92270
Phone : (760) 324-4511
BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM
Below, please check the box next to the name of the board/comm ission on which you would like to serve . Please check only one box, as a separate application is required for each board/commission on which you would like to serve .
CITY BOARDS/COMMISSIONS*
□ Community Cultural Commission
□ Community Emergency Preparedness Commission
□ Community Parks & Trails Commission
□ Historic Preservation Commission
□ Housing Commission
□ Library & Observatory Advisory Commission
□ Library & Observatory Foundation Board
m Mobilehome Fair Practices Commission
□ Planning Commission
□ Traffic Safety Commission
OUTSIDE AGENCY BOARDS/COMMISSIONH
□ Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector
Control District Board
□ The Joslyn Center Board
□ Palm Springs International Airport Commission
*Please see attached information sheet
for City board/commission descriptions.
**Please note that outside agency
board/commission terms differ from City
board/commission terms.
Contae\ Information
Name: \;,,/ALL.. A ~ ~ &, A LL-'1 J I-\ 1'.._
Residence Address
Mailing Address : __ R_A_N ____ N __ \ ~_t_G-_~ ___ c __ A ________ _ Phone : (work) .--
(cell)
E-Mail Address :
Emergency Contact: name P ~ n-\ l + \ <-c.-
Additional Information
Occupation : _R __ ~---------------------------
Name of Employer : _____________________________ _
Length of Residency in Rancho Mirage : ...;:d:;;___3._..,..;_t:_~--------------' Are you registered to vote in Rancho Mirage? (Plea se check one) Updated Feb . 2025 19
B o a r d / ( u 111 111 1 s s I o 11 A p 11 I I c :i I I o n f· o r 111 21 Pagc Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Some boards/commissions are subject to the Conflict of Interest Codes of the City and/or State. If you serve on a board/commission, you may be required to disclose certain economic interests held within the City of Rancho Mirage. If required, are you willing to disclose such information? (Please check one) ITves 0No
Ethics Training
All City board/commission members are required to complete a State-approved two-hour local officials ethics training course upon appointment, and every two years thereafter during continuous service.
Are you willing to complete the required ethics training? (Please check one) [0{es 0No
Background Check
All City board/commission members are required to submit to a criminal background check (at no cost to the applicant) upon appointment and may not assume office until a successful background check has been completed. Are you willing to submit to a criminal background check? (Please check one) ~es 0No
Background Information
Below, please provide a brief biographical sketch, including education, work experience, c1v1c involvement, and any other information relevant to the position you seek. Please feel free to attach a resume.
w v 1<. It.. ~;,< Pf;/Z. 1 e:; n c. £ -
20 City Council Staff Report
Authorization of Opioid Settlement Agreements with Purdue/Sackler and Approval and Execution of Future Opioid Settlement Agreements
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5E.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Jessica Pulliam, Deputy of Sustainability
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into the Settlement Agreements with the Purdue/Sackler Settlement, Agreeing to the Terms of the California State-Subdivision Agreement, and Authorizing the City Manager to Approve and Execute Future Proposed Opioid Settlement Agreements.
DISCUSSION
The opioid epidemic has had severe impacts across the nation, leading to extensive litigation against manufacturers, distributors, and retailers. Over the last several years, multiple national settlements have been reached with pharmaceutical companies, distributors, and pharmacy chains. The City Council has previously authorized participation in such settlements to ensure Rancho Mirage receives its share of abatement funds.
In 2025, a new national opioid settlement was reached in connection with Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy proceedings and direct claims against the Sackler family. This proposed settlement, known as the Purdue/Sackler Settlement, resolves outstanding litigation and provides for the distribution of settlement funds to states and local governments, including the City of Rancho Mirage.
California, along with numerous cities and counties, has negotiated a California State-Subdivision Agreement to govern the distribution and use of settlement proceeds within the state. As in prior opioid settlements, at least 85% of the funds must be used for opioid remediation, with at least 50% directed to “High Impact Abatement Activities,” such as expanding treatment infrastructure, prevention programs for at-risk youth, diversion from the justice system, and supporting vulnerable populations.
Participation in this settlement requires execution of the Participation Form and the California State-Subdivision Agreement by September 30, 2025. Local jurisdictions that do not opt in will not be eligible for direct allocations, and funds attributable to non-participating cities will instead be redirected to the State.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the Resolution and participate in the Purdue/Sackler Settlement, ensuring Rancho Mirage’s eligibility for opioid abatement funding.
2. Decline to participate, which would forfeit the City’s direct eligibility for funds, with those funds instead flowing to the State.
21 FUTURE OPIOID SETTLEMENTS
As part of this action, Staff is requesting that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve and execute any future opioid settlement agreements, as set forth in the attached Resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT
The funds received by opting into the settlement agreement(s) are restricted, therefore there is no direct impact on the General Fund. Funds relative to the agreements are deposited and appropriated in the Opioid Settlement Special Funds.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Draft Resolution
Attachment 1 - Purdue/Sackler Settlement Participation Form 22 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-_____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO THE SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENTS WITH THE PURDUE/SACKLER SETTLEMENT, AGREEING TO THE
TERMS OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE-SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE AND EXECUTE FUTURE
PROPOSED OPIOID SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Mirage (“City”) is a charter city and recognized as a political subdivision of the State of California for certain purposes; and WHEREAS, the United States continues to face a severe public health crisis of opioid abuse, addiction, overdose, and death, with billions of dollars spent annually by the State of California and California local governments to address its consequences; and WHEREAS, since 2017, state and local governments across the nation have pursued litigation against manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of opioids (“Opioid Defendants”) to hold them accountable for the impacts of the opioid epidemic; and WHEREAS, in 2025, a settlement was reached in connection with Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy proceedings and direct claims against the Sackler family, resolving state and local government claims through the Purdue/Sackler Settlement; and WHEREAS, copies of the Purdue/Sackler Settlement Agreement and the California State-Subdivision Agreement have been made available to the City Council with this Resolution and are also publicly available at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/purdue-sacklers-settlements/; and WHEREAS, the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Purdue/Sackler Settlement governs the allocation, distribution, and permitted use of abatement funds to be received by California and its participating subdivisions; and
WHEREAS, to receive settlement funds, the City must affirmatively opt in by executing the Participation Form and the California State-Subdivision Agreement on or before September 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the funds received must be used for opioid remediation, with at least fifty percent (50%) directed to High Impact Abatement Activities such as treatment infrastructure, diversion programs, overdose prevention, and youth intervention strategies; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Manager to enter into this settlement and approve and execute future opioid-related settlements to ensure Rancho Mirage is positioned to receive funds for local and regional abatement efforts.
ATTACHMENT 1
23 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals
That the Recitals set forth above are true and correct.
Section 2. Authorization to Enter Purdue/Sackler Settlement
That the City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager or designee to:
1. Execute the Participation Form for the Purdue/Sackler Settlement and all documents ancillary thereto; and
2. Execute the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds – Purdue/Sackler Settlement; and
3. Notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that the City requests a direct payment under the Allocation Agreements at least 60 days prior to the Payment Date in the Settlement Agreements.
Section 3. Authorization for Future Settlements
That the City Council further authorizes the City Manager or designee, without need for further City Council review or approval, to settle and release the City’s claims against any other manufacturers, distributors, or related defendants of opioids whose unlawful conduct allegedly contributed to the opioid epidemic (“Future Settling Defendants”), in exchange for consideration set forth in agreements substantially similar to prior opioid settlement agreements and related California Allocation Agreements. This authorization includes without limitation the authority to:
1. Execute any Participation Agreements or Forms with Future Settling Defendants, and any and all documents ancillary thereto; and
2. Execute the applicable California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds by executing the signature pages to such agreements; and
3. Notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that the City requests direct payment under such agreements at least sixty (60) days prior to the applicable payment date.
Section 4. Funds to be Placed in Account
That the City shall establish an Opioid Abatement Account, and the City’s Local Allocation Funds shall be deposited in the City’s Opioid Abatement Account.
24 Section 5. Ratification of Prior Necessary Actions
That all actions heretofore taken by the Council and other appropriate public officers and agents of the City with respect to the matters contemplated under this Resolution are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.
Section 6. Severability
That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution or Personnel Rules and Regulations attached hereto be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution and Personnel Rules and Regulations as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 7. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all provisions heretofore adopted by the City or the City Council in effect prior to the effective date of this Resolution that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.
Section 8. Effective Date
That this Resolution shall take immediately upon adoption.
Section 9. Certification
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
25 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this ____ day of September, 2025.
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
____________________________
Ted Weill, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Colin D. Kirkpatrick, City Attorney
26 New National Opioids Settlement: Purdue
Opioids Implementation Administrator
[email protected]
Rancho Mirage city, CA
Reference Number: CL-1731436
TO LOCAL POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS:
THIS PACKAGE CONTAINS DOCUMENTATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE NEW NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT. YOU MUST TAKE ACTION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE.
Deadline: September 30, 2025
A new proposed national opioids settlement has been reached with Purdue (and certain of its affiliates) and the Sackler family. This Participation Package is a follow- up communication to the Notice of New National Opioids Settlement recently received electronically by your subdivision.
The proposed settlement is being implemented in connection with Purdue’s bankruptcy proceedings, and consists of, among other things, a settlement of Purdue’s claims against the Sacklers and certain other parties (referred to as the “Purdue Estate Settlement”), and settlements of direct claims against the Sacklers held by States, local governments and other creditors (collectively, the “Purdue Direct Settlement”, and together with the Estate Settlement, the “Purdue Settlement”). The Purdue Direct Settlement for States and local governments is documented in the Governmental Entity and Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement.
You are receiving this Participation Package because all eligible States and territories, including California, are participating in the Purdue Direct Settlement.
This electronic envelope contains:
The Participation Form for the Purdue Direct Settlement, including a release of any claims; and
The Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds - Purdue/Sackler Settlement (“California State- Subdivision Agreement”), which governs the allocation, distribution, and use of abatement funds from the Purdue Settlement paid to California.
The Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement must be executed, without alteration, and submitted on or before September 30, 2025, in order for your subdivision to be considered for initial participation calculations and payment eligibility under the Purdue Direct Settlement.
Based upon subdivision participation forms received on or before September 30, 2025, the subdivision participation rate will be used to determine whether Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD ATTACHMENT 2 27 participation is sufficient for the Purdue Settlement to move forward and whether a state earns its maximum potential payment under the Purdue Direct Settlement. If the Purdue Settlement moves forward and goes effective, your release will become effective. If the Purdue Settlement does not move forward, that release will not become effective.
Any subdivision that does not participate in the Purdue Direct Settlement cannot directly share in the Purdue Direct Settlement funds, even if other subdivisions in the state are participating and sharing in those Purdue Direct Settlement funds. Any subdivision that does not participate may also reduce the amount of money for programs to remediate the opioid crisis in its state. Please note, a subdivision will not necessarily directly receive Purdue Settlement funds by participating; decisions on how Purdue Settlement funds will be allocated within a state are subject to intrastate agreements or state statutes.
You are encouraged to discuss the terms and benefits of the Purdue Settlement with your counsel, your Attorney General’s Office, and other contacts within your state.
The State of California, along with a group of cities and counties, negotiated the California State-Subdivision Agreement, which governs the allocation, distribution, and use of abatement funds from the Purdue Settlement paid to California. The allocation of abatement funds will be similar to the allocation in the prior opioids settlements, where the vast majority (85%) of abatement funds is expected to go to local governments.
Information and documents regarding the Purdue Settlement, including a complete copy of the Governmental Entity and Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement, and how it is being implemented in your state and how funds will be allocated within your state can be found on the national settlement website at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/purdue-sacklers-settlements/ . This website will be supplemented as additional documents are created.
How to return signed forms:
There are three methods for returning the executed Participation Form and any supporting documentation to the Implementation Administrator:
(1)Electronic Signature via DocuSign: Executing the Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement electronically through DocuSign will return the signed form and agreement to the Implementation Administrator and associate your form and agreement with your subdivision’s records.
Electronic signature is the most efficient method for returning the Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement, allowing for more timely participation and the potential to meet higher settlement payment thresholds, and is therefore strongly encouraged.
(2)Manual Signature returned via DocuSign: DocuSign allows forms to be downloaded, signed manually, then uploaded to DocuSign and returned automatically to the Implementation Administrator. Please be sure to complete Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 28 all fields. As with electronic signature, returning a manually signed Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement via DocuSign will associate your signed form and agreement with your subdivision’s records. (3)Manual Signature returned via electronic mail: If your subdivision is unable to return an executed Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement using DocuSign, the signed Participation Form and California State- Subdivision Agreement may be returned via electronic mail to [email protected]. Please include the name, state, and reference ID of your subdivision in the body of the email and use the subject line Settlement Participation Form – [Subdivision Name, Subdivision State] – [Reference ID].
Detailed instructions on how to sign and return the Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement, including changing the authorized signer, can be found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/purdue-sacklers-settlements/ . You may also contact [email protected].
YOU MUST PARTICIPATE IN THE PURDUE DIRECT SETTLEMENT BY
RETURNING YOUR PARTICIPATION FORM AND CALIFORNIA STATE-
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS OF THE PURDUE SETTLEMENT.
Please note that this is NOT a solicitation or a request for subdivisions to submit votes on the Purdue bankruptcy plan. This settlement package only pertains to a decision to participate in the Purdue Direct Settlement. If you receive a package to vote on the plan you should follow the applicable instructions for voting. PLEASE NOTE THAT VOTING ON THE PLAN IS SEPARATE FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE PURDUE DIRECT SETTLEMENT.
The sign-on period for subdivisions ends on September 30, 2025.
If you have any questions about executing the Participation Form, please contact your counsel, the Implementation Administrator at
[email protected], or the California Attorney General’s Office at [email protected].
Thank you,
Implementation Administrator for the Purdue Direct Settlement The Implementation Administrator is retained to provide the settlement notice required by the Purdue Direct Settlement to manage the collection of the participation forms for it.
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 29 EXHIBIT K
Subdivision Participation and Release Form
Governmental Entity: Rancho Mirage city State: CA
Authorized Signatory: /officialname_purdue/
Address 1: /address1_purdue/
Address 2: /address2_purdue/
City, State, Zip: /cit_pd/ /state_pd/ /zi_pd/ Phone: /phone_purdue/
Email: /email_purdue/
The governmental entity identified above (“Governmental Entity”), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to that certain Governmental Entity & Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement accompanying this participation form (the “Agreement”)1, and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Agreement, grant the releases set forth below, and agrees as follows.
1.The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Agreement, and agrees that by executing this Participation and Release Form, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Agreement and become a Participating Subdivision as provided therein.
2.The Governmental Entity shall promptly after the Effective Date, and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, dismiss with prejudice any Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims that it has filed. With respect to any Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims pending in In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, the Governmental Entity authorizes the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee to execute and file on behalf of the Governmental Entity a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice substantially in the form found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com .
3.The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Agreement pertaining to Participating Subdivisions as defined therein.
4.By agreeing to the terms of the Agreement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning following the Effective Date.
5.The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Agreement solely for the purposes provided therein.
6.The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the court in the Governmental Entity’s state where the Consent Judgment is filed for purposes limited to that court’s role as and to the extent provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent provided in, the 1 Capitalized terms used in this Exhibit K but not otherwise defined in this Exhibit K have the meanings given to them in the Agreement or, if not defined in the Agreement, the Master Settlement Agreement.
K-1
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD I
30 Agreement. The Governmental Entity likewise agrees to arbitrate before the National Arbitration Panel as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent otherwise provided in, the Agreement.
7.The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the Agreement as provided therein.
8.The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Agreement, including without limitation all provisions of Article 10 (Release), and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in his or her official capacity whether elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Subdivision Releasor, to the maximum extent of its authority, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby confirmed, the Shareholder Released Parties and Released Parties are, as of the Effective Date, hereby released and forever discharged by the Governmental Entity and its Subdivision Releasors from: any and all Causes of Action, including, without limitation, any Estate Cause of Action and any claims that the Governmental Entity or its Subdivision Releasors would have presently or in the future been legally entitled to assert in its own right (whether individually or collectively), notwithstanding section 1542 of the California Civil Code or any law of any jurisdiction that is similar, comparable or equivalent thereto (which shall conclusively be deemed waived), whether existing or hereinafter arising, in each case, (A) directly or indirectly based on, arising out of, or in any way relating to or concerning, in whole or in part, (i) the Debtors, as such Entities existed prior to or after the Petition Date, and their Affiliates, (ii) the Estates, (iii) the Chapter 11 Cases, or (iv) Covered Conduct and (B) as to which any conduct, omission or liability of any Debtor or any Estate is the legal cause or is otherwise a legally relevant factor (each such release, as it pertains to the Shareholder Released Parties, the “Shareholder Released Claims”, and as it pertains to the Released Parties other than the Shareholder Released Parties, the “Released Claims”). For the avoidance of doubt and without limiting the foregoing: the Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims include any Cause of Action that has been or may be asserted against any Shareholder Released Party or Released Party by the Governmental Entity or its Subdivision Releasors (whether or not such party has brought such action or proceeding) in any federal, state, or local action or proceeding (whether judicial, arbitral, or administrative) (A) directly or indirectly based on, arising out of, or in any way relating to or concerning, in whole or in part, (i) the Debtors, as such Entities existed prior to or after the Petition Date, and their Affiliates, (ii) the Estates, (iii) the Chapter 11 Cases, or (iv) Covered Conduct and (B) as to which any conduct, omission or liability of any Debtor or any Estate is the legal cause or is otherwise a legally relevant factor.
9.As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Shareholder Released Claims or Released Claims against any Shareholder Released Party or Released Party in any forum whatsoever, subject in all respects to Section 9.02 of the Master Settlement Agreement. The releases provided for herein (including the term “Shareholder Released K-2
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 31 Claims” and “Released Claims”) are intended by the Governmental Entity and its Subdivision Releasors to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Shareholder Released Parties and Released Parties the broadest possible release of any liability relating in any way to Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The Agreement shall be a complete bar to any Shareholder Released Claim and Released Claims.
10.To the maximum extent of the Governmental Entity’s power, the Shareholder Released Parties and the Released Parties are, as of the Effective Date, hereby released and discharged from any and all Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims of the Subdivision Releasors.
11.The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision as set forth in the Agreement.
12.In connection with the releases provided for in the Agreement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:
General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.
A Releasor may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which it knows, believes, or assumes to be true with respect to the Shareholder Released Claims or such other Claims released pursuant to this release, but each Governmental Entity hereby expressly waives and fully, finally, and forever settles, releases and discharges, upon the Effective Date, any and all Shareholder Released Claims or such other Claims released pursuant to this release that may exist as of such date but which Releasors do not know or suspect to exist, whether through ignorance, oversight, error, negligence or through no fault whatsoever, and which, if known, would materially affect the Governmental Entities’ decision to participate in the Agreement.
13.Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Agreement, to which Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent any portion of this Participation and Release Form not relating to the release of, or bar against, liability is interpreted differently from the Agreement in any respect, the Agreement controls.
14.Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein or in the Agreement, (x) nothing herein shall (A) release any Excluded Claims or (B) be construed to impair in any way the rights and obligations of any Person under the Agreement; and (y) the Releases set forth herein shall be subject to being deemed void to the extent set forth in Section 9.02 of the Master Settlement Agreement.
K-3
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 32 I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Participation and Release Form on behalf of the Governmental Entity.
Signature:/signer_1_purdue/
Name:/name_1_purdue/
Title:/title_1_purdue/
Date:/date_1_purdue/
K-4
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 33 1
Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds
Purdue/Sackler Settlement
1.Introduction
The State of California1 and certain of its cities and counties have reached this proposed agreement (the “California Purdue/Sackler State-Subdivision Agreement” or the “Agreement”) to govern the payments made to California in In re: Purdue Pharma L.P., et al, Case No. 19- 23649, pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (the “Purdue Bankruptcy Matter”) and pursuant to the related settlement with the Sacklers.
This Agreement is proposed to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of payments, including the Statewide Payment Amounts, consisting of Base Payments and Incentive Payments, and Estate Distributions, paid to California pursuant to the Governmental Entity & Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement (“GESA”), the Master Settlement Agreement (“MSA”), the Thirteenth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Purdue Pharma L.P. and its Affiliated Debtors (the “Plan”), and the Governmental Remediation Trust Agreement (“GRTA”), and any revisions thereto (collectively, the “Governing Documents”), filed in the Purdue Bankruptcy Matter.
For the avoidance of doubt, this Agreement does not apply to payments of attorneys’ fees and costs made to California, including any payments to California from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund and the State Expenses Fund and payments pursuant to Sections
9.01, 9.02, and 9.03 and Exhibit R of the GESA and Sections 5.9(a) and 5.9(b) of the Plan, unless otherwise noted.
Pursuant to Exhibit O, paragraph 4, of the GESA, acceptance of this California State-Subdivision Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.
2.Definitions
a)CA Participating Subdivision means a General Purpose Government that is a Participating Subdivision and also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision; (b) a Primary Subdivision; and/or (c) a Non-Litigating Threshold Subdivision. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California Subdivisions listed in Exhibits C (excluding Litigating Special Districts), I, and/or W to the GESA. b)CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California. For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special District does not include School Districts and certain Health and Hospital Special Districts that fall under a separate creditor group in the Purdue Bankruptcy Plan. 1 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 34 2
c)Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. d)Opioid Defendant means any defendant (including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. a/k/a Mylan N.V.; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.
Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.
3.General Terms
This Agreement is subject to the requirements of the Governing Documents, as well as applicable law, and the Governing Documents govern over any inconsistent provision of this California Purdue/Sackler State-Subdivision Agreement. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Governing Documents.
All payments made to the State of California and CA Participating Subdivisions subject to this Agreement will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section 5.02(b) of the GESA and Section 4.01(f)(ii) of the MSA.
This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California for attorneys’ fees and cost, including payments from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund or the State Expenses Fund, unless otherwise noted.
4.State Allocation
Funds allocated to California shall be combined pursuant to this Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”).
A.State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the payments to California subject to this Agreement will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 35 3
B.CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i.Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a)Seventy percent of the payments to California subject to this Agreement will be allocated to the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the “Local Allocation”). For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and counties with a population less than 10,000 (except those that are Plaintiff Subdivisions) are not eligible to receive an allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b)A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision, and will receive payments as provided in the Governing Documents and this Agreement. c)A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the “Distributors Settlement”), that city’s Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to the city. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the county’s share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds). d)A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share, with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. e)The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but has not, for a particular payment, become a Participating Subdivision. f)Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Governing Documents and this Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 36 4
Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State. ii.Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a)The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the GESA.
b)In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1)the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2)creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3)addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4)diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5)interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice-impacted youth, youth experiencing adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or (6)the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversals.
c)The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list. d)For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Governing Documents and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Governing Documents and this Agreement, a county and Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 37 5
any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated. iii.CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a)Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving funds pursuant to the Purdue Bankruptcy Plan and related Sackler settlement must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Governing Documents and this Agreement. b)If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Governing Documents or this Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern. c)If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d)If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action against the Subdivision in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Governing Documents or this Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this Agreement. e)Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.
C.CA Subdivision Fund
i.Fifteen percent of the payments to California subject to this Agreement will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Governing Documents and this Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 38 6
However, in no event shall more than one-third (5% out of the 15%) be used for litigation-related fees and expenses.
D.Provision for State Back-Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) (“MDL Fees Order”) in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) “cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee agreements at 15%.” Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its contingency fees and costs from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund pursuant to the Governing Documents, and if applicable, the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement agreements with other Opioid Defendants.
A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency-fee counsel (“State Back-Stop Agreement”), pursuant to Exhibit R of the GESA and the MDL Fees Order, so long as: (1) such payments, together with any payments to contingency-fee counsel from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund related to such Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision’s total gross recovery under this Agreement; and (2) Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments made under a State Back-Stop Agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid Abatement use requirements under Section 5.02(a) of the GESA and Section 4.01(f)(i) of the MSA. Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund funded pursuant to the Governing Documents. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
To effectuate a State Back-Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into agreements presented in other forms.
For the avoidance of doubt, this Agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or enter into a State Back-Stop Agreement, and no State Back-Stop Agreement shall impose any duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without limitation the Attorney General.
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 39 7
5.State and Subdivision Reporting
a)DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State’s use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b)Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the Purdue Bankruptcy Plan and related Sackler settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the Purdue Bankruptcy Plan and related Sackler settlement have been used in compliance with the Governing Documents and this Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c)The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other payments will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d)Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Governing Documents and this Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section 5.02(b) of the GESA and Section 4.01(f)(ii) of the MSA, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Administrator and Sackler Parties’ Representative.
e)In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.
6.Miscellaneous
a)The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this California Purdue/Sackler State-Subdivision Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 40 8
b)Except as provided in the Governing Documents, this California Purdue/Sackler State- Subdivision Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c)Except as provided in this Agreement, if any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this Agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d)Except as provided in the Governing Documents, this Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 41 9
The undersigned, Rancho Mirage city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds - Purdue/Sackler Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds - Purdue/Sackler Settlement.
I swear under penalty of perjury that I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this agreement on behalf of the Governmental Entity.
Signature:/signer_1_purdue/
Name:/name_1_purdue/
Title:/title_1_purdue/
Date:/date_1_purdue/
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 42 APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Purdue/Sackler Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re-allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one- hundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled “Weighted Allocation Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 43 APPENDIX 1
1 of 15
100.000%100.000%100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Alameda County Alameda 2.332%2.853%2.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069%0.0570162%
City Albany Alameda 0.013%0.0107768%
City Berkeley Alameda 0.152%0.1249656%
City Dublin Alameda 0.033%0.040%0.0338810%
City Emeryville Alameda 0.023%0.0185765%
City Fremont Alameda 0.108%0.0888576%
City Hayward Alameda 0.117%0.0966218%
City Livermore Alameda 0.054%0.0446740%
City Newark Alameda 0.026%0.0217626%
City Oakland Alameda 0.486%0.595%0.5055601%
City Piedmont Alameda 0.014%0.0114064%
City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067%0.0554547%
City San Leandro Alameda 0.039%0.0321267%
City Union City Alameda 0.043%0.0352484%
County Amador County Amador 0.226%0.277%0.2349885%
County Butte County Butte 1.615%1.975%1.6783178%
City Chico Butte 0.216%0.264%0.2246499%
City Oroville Butte 0.079%0.0646595%
County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226%0.277%0.2351644% County Colusa County Colusa 0.059%0.0489221 %
County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102%2.571%2.1844585% City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037%0.0301879%
City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026%0.0215339%
City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002%0.0018060%
City Concord Contra Costa 0.055%0.0456676%
City Danville Contra Costa 0.010%0.0082255%
City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023%0.0189024%
City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010%0.0078273%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 44 APPENDIX 1
2 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006%0.0046030%
City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012%0.0098593%
City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004%0.0031007%
City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010%0.0079416%
City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005%0.0038157%
City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013%0.0110909%
City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053%0.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013%0.0106309%
City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146%0.1201444%
City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018%0.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021%0.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026%0.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114%0.140%0.1189608% County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768%0.939%0.7980034% City Placerville El Dorado 0.015%0.0127642%
City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081%0.0665456%
County Fresno County Fresno 1.895%2.318%1.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065%0.0536211 %
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012%0.0098554%
City Fresno Fresno 0.397%0.3270605%
City Kerman Fresno 0.005%0.0042534%
City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008%0.0066167%
City Mendota Fresno 0.002%0.0019387%
City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004%0.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008%0.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012%0.0098804%
City Sanger Fresno 0.018%0.0146135%
City Selma Fresno 0.015%0.0127537%
County Glenn County Glenn 0.107%0.131%0.1116978%
County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030%1.260%1.0703185%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 45 APPENDIX 1
3 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Arcata Humboldt 0.054%0.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117%0.143%0.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032%0.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258%0.315%0.2679006%
City Brawley Imperial 0.011%0.0087986%
City Calexico Imperial 0.019%0.0152799%
City El Centro Imperial 0.158%0.1302522%
City Imperial Imperial 0.006%0.0048791%
County Inyo County Inyo 0.073%0.089%0.0754413%
County Kern County Kem 2.517%3.079%2.6159145%
City Arvin Kem 0.006%0.0046425%
City Bakersfield Kem 0.212%0.1747198%
City California City Kem 0.009%0.0070820%
City Delano Kem 0.030%0.0249316%
City McFarland Kem 0.003%0.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kem 0.015%0.0120938%
City Shafter Kem 0.013%0.0103417%
City Tehachapi Kem 0.009%0.0073580%
City Wasco Kem 0.008%0.0069861%
County Kings County Kings 0.293%0.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007%0.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013%0.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027%0.0226038%
City Lemoore Kings 0.016%0.0131900%
County Lake County Lake 0.795%0.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041%0.050%0.0426253%
City Lakeport Lake 0.021%0.026%0.0222964%
County Lassen County Lassen 0.319%0.391%0.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027%0.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896%16.999%14.4437559% Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 46 AP
P
E
N
D
I
X
1 4 of
15 Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Cl
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Co
u
n
t
y
Ab
ate
m
e
n
t
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
Pla
i
n
t
i
f
f
Su
bd
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
W
e
igh
t
e
d
Al
l
c
a
t
i
o
n
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
City
Ag
o
u
r
a
Hi
l
l
s
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
5 %
0.0 0
4 0
0 2
4 %
City
Al
h
a
m
b
r
a
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 4
2 %
0.0 3
4 3
3 0
9 %
City
Ar
c
a
d
i
a
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 3
3 %
0.0 2
6 7
7 1
8 %
City
Ar
t
e
s
i
a
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
1 %
0.0 0
0 5
1 0
0 %
City
Az
u
s
a
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 2
6 %
0.0 2
1 0
8 5
7 %
City
Ba
l
d
w
i
n
Pa
r
k
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 2
7 %
0.0 2
1 8
5 2
0 %
City
Be
l
l
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
8 %
0.0 0
6 8
7 8
3 %
City
Be
l
l
f
l
o
w
e
r
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
2 %
0.0 0
1 4
4 8
5 %
City
Be
l
l
Ga
r
d
e
n
s
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 1
4 %
0.0 1
1 4
3 0
1 %
City
Be
v
e
r
l
y
Hi
l
l
s
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 6
5 %
0.0 5
3 4
8 9
7 %
City
Bu
r
b
a
n
k
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.1 0
0 %
0.0 8
2 3
1 3
2 %
City
Ca
l
a
b
a
s
a
s
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
6 %
0.0 0
4 8
9 4
8 %
City
Ca
r
s
o
n
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 1
9 %
0.0 1
5 9
8 0
5 %
City
Ce
r
r
i
t
o
s
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
5 %
0.0 0
3 9
6 8
2 %
Ci
t
y
Cl
a
r
e
m
o
n
t
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 1
0 %
0.0 0
8 2
5 8
4 %
Ci
t
y
Co
mm
e
r
c
e
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
0 %
0.00 0
2 9
7 1
%
Ci
t
y
Co
mp
t
o
n
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 4
4 %
0.0 3
6 1
8 8
2 %
Ci
t
y
Co
v
i
n
a
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 2
8 %
0.0 2
2 9
1 2
7 %
Ci
t
y
Cu
da
h
y
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
1 %
0.0 0
0 6
0 2
0 %
Ci
t
y
Cu
l
v
e
r
C
i
t
y
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 5
5 %
0.0 4
4 9
8 9
4 %
Ci
t
y
Di
a
m
o
n
d
Ba
r
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
1 %
0.0 0
0 6
9 9
3 %
Ci
t
y
Do
wn
e
y
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 5
2 %
0.0 4
2 9
9 9
4 %
Ci
t
y
Du
a
r
t
e
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
3 %
0.0 0
2 7
2 6
1 %
Ci
t
y
El Mo
nte
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 3
1 %
0.0 3
8 %
0.0 3
1 8
9 8
5 %
Ci
t
y
El Se
gu
n
d
o
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 3
3 %
0.0 2
6 8
0 2
0 %
Ci
t
y
Ga
r
d
e
n
a
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 3
4 %
0.0 2
7 8
0 8
8 %
Ci
t
y
Gl
e
n
d
a
l
e
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.1 6
6 %
0.1 3
6 6
5 8
6 %
City
Gl
e
n
d
o
r
a
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 1
6 %
0.01 3
4 4
1 1
%
Cit
y
Ha
w
a
i
i
a
n
Ga
r
d
e
n
s
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 0
5 %
0.0 0
4 0
5 4
9 %
City
Ha
w
t
h
o
r
n
e
Lo
s
An
g
e
l
e
s
0.0 5
0 %
0.0 4
0 7
8 3
3 %
Do
c
u
s
i
g
n
E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
I
D
:
C
4 B
1 6
2 4
2 -
4 D
A
A
-
4 7
3 8
-
9 4
B
8 -
5 8
9 B
3 A
D
C
0 B
C
D
~ ~
47 APPENDIX 1
5 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018%0.0145307%
City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023%0.0190667%
City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059%0.0489195%
City La Cafiada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003%0.0025565% City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005%0.0039971%
City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010%0.0081572%
City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045%0.0369689%
City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002%0.0012999%
City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024%0.0194190%
City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002%0.0017731%
City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004%0.0031940%
City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439%0.3614151%
City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715%3.321%2.8218811%
City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016%0.0134345%
City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002%0.0019269%
City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032%0.0260686%
City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004%0.0035528%
City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031%0.0254455%
City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030%0.0250670%
City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031%0.0256677%
City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031%0.0258228%
City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046%0.0375827%
City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006%0.0053102%
City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011%0.0091483%
City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146%0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022%0.0183333%
City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111%0.0911933%
City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002%0.0012645%
City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062%0.0506992%
City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003%0.0028260%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 48 APPENDIX 1
6 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003%0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013%0.0104837%
City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018%0.0147726%
City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009%0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022%0.0178167%
City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031%0.0257531%
City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158%0.1298513%
City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006%0.0048646%
City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010%0.0084884%
City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005%0.0039603%
City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020%0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012%0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0.005%0.0039498%
City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112%0.0919820%
City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006%0.0047305%
City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049%0.0404521%
City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013%0.0108517%
City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032%0.0260581%
County Madera County Madera 0.349%0.427%0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012%0.0097332%
City Madera Madera 0.039%0.0318441%
County Marin County Marin 0.564%0.690%0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015%0.0124697%
City Mill Valley Marin 0.020%0.0168401%
City Novato Marin 0.028%0.0229824%
City San Anselmo Marin 0.009%0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089%0.0729823%
County Mariposa County Mariposa 0.084%0.103%0.0876131%
County Mendocino County Mendocino 0.439%0.536%0.4558394% City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039%0.0317153%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 49 APPENDIX 1
7 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Merced County Merced 0.551%0.674%0.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024%0.0195846%
City Livingston Merced 0.006%0.0045873%
City Los Banos Merced 0.020%0.0165142%
City Merced Merced 0.061%0.0500762%
County Modoc County Modoc 0.065%0.080%0.0678250%
County Mono County Mono 0.023%0.029%0.0242606%
County Monterey County Monterey 0.908%1.111%0.9437083%
City Greenfield Monterey 0.006%0.0050552%
City King City Monterey 0.005%0.0037355%
City Marina Monterey 0.017%0.0144098%
City Monterey Monterey 0.041%0.0336540%
City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009%0.0074842%
City Salinas Monterey 0.094%0.0776576%
City Seaside Monterey 0.023%0.0191772%
City Soledad Monterey 0.007%0.0060870%
County Napa County Napa 0.288%0.352%0.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017%0.0136869%
City Napa Napa 0.078%0.0642783%
County Nevada County Nevada 0.441%0.539%0.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024%0.0197805%
City Truckee Nevada 0.003%0.0023843%
County Orange County Orange 4.364%5.339%4.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014%0.0113841%
City Anaheim Orange 0.554%0.678%0.5759282%
City Brea Orange 0.086%0.0708897%
City Buena Park Orange 0.087%0.0714352%
City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124%0.152%0.1288366%
City Cypress Orange 0.033%0.0271937%
City Dana Point Orange 0.001%0.0005560%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 50 APPENDIX 1
8 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055%0.0455980%
City Fullerton Orange 0.137%0.168%0.1425744%
City Garden Grove Orange 0.213%0.1752482%
City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247%0.302%0.2568420%
City Irvine Orange 0.139%0.170%0.1442350%
City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047%0.058%0.0493043%
City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014%0.0115457%
City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001%0.0007071%
City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001%0.0006546%
City La Habra Orange 0.060%0.073%0.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012%0.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012%0.0095439%
City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008%0.0069190%
City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014%0.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179%0.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150%0.1231320%
City Placentia Orange 0.029%0.035%0.0298912%
City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001%0.0006296%
City San Clemente Orange 0.008%0.010%0.0086083%
City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008%0.0065510%
City Santa Ana Orange 0.502%0.614%0.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020%0.0165891%
City Stanton Orange 0.035%0.0291955%
City Tustin Orange 0.073%0.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104%0.127%0.1082721%
City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044%0.0362223%
County Placer County Placer 1.045%1.278%1.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017%0.0141114%
City Lincoln Placer 0.031%0.0255599%
City Rocklin Placer 0.076%0.0625485%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 51 AP
P
E
N
D
I
X
1 9 of
15 Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Cl
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Co
u
n
t
y
Ab
ate
m
e
n
t
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
Pla
i
n
t
i
f
f
Su
bd
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
W
e
igh
t
e
d
Al
l
c
a
t
i
o
n
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
City
Ro
s
e
v
i
l
l
e
Place
r
0.1 9
6 %
0.1 6
1 6
5 5
9 %
Co
un
t
y
Pl
u
m
a
s
Co
u
n
t
y
Plu
m
a
s
0.2 0
5 %
0.2 5
1 %
0.2 1
2 8
7 2
9 %
Co
un
t
y
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
Co
u
n
t
y
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
4.5 3
4 %
5.5 4
7 %
4.7 1
2 8
2 9
6 %
City
Ba
n
n
i
n
g
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 1
7 %
0.0 1
4 3
8 4
8 %
City
Be
a
u
m
o
n
t
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 2
1 %
0.0 1
7 1
1 3
5 %
City
Bl
y
t
h
e
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 1
2 %
0.0 0
9 6
7 1
4 %
City
Ca
n
y
o
n
La
k
e
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 0
0 %
0.0 0
0 1
7 6
1 %
City
Ca
t
h
e
d
r
a
l
Cit
y
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 6
7 %
0.0 5
5 3
6 1
4 %
City
Co
a
c
h
e
l
l
a
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 2
1 %
0.0 1
7 3
0 5
4 %
City
Co
r
o
n
a
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.1 4
7 %
0.1 2
0 7
0 8
3 %
City
De
s
e
r
t
Ho
t
Sp
r
i
n
g
s
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 2
4 %
0.0 2
0 0
4 3
3 %
City
Ea
s
t
v
a
l
e
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 0
0 %
0.0 0
0 2
7 4
7 %
City
He
m
e
t
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 5
1 %
0.0 4
2 1
7 9
2 %
City
Ind
i
o
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 5
6 %
0.0 4
5 7
7 9
4 %
City
Ju
r
u
p
a
Va
l
l
e
y
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 0
1 %
0.00 0
8 9
9 1
%
Cit
y
La
k
e
Els
i
n
o
r
e
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 2
1 %
0.0 1
7 2
9 4
9 %
City
La
Qu
i
n
t
a
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 6
3 %
0.0 5
1 6
7 3
2 %
Ci
t
y
M
e
n
i
f
e
e
Ri
ve
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 3
2 %
0.0 2
6 0
9 0
9 %
Ci
t
y
Mo
r
e
n
o
Va
lle
y
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.13 7
%
0.1 1
3 0
3 4
8 %
Ci
t
y
M
u
r
r
i
e
t
a
Ri
ve
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 4
8 %
0.0 5
9 %
0.0 4
9 7
4 2
3 %
Ci
t
y
No
r
c
o
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 1
6 %
0.0 1
3 4
5 4
2 %
Ci
t
y
Pa
l
m
De
s
e
r
t
Ri
ve
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 8
3 %
0.0 6
8 2
4 6
5 %
Ci
t
y
Pa
l
m
Sp
r
i
n
g
s
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 7
6 %
0.0 6
2 9
8 6
2 %
Ci
t
y
Pe
r
r
i
s
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 0
9 %
0.0 0
7 6
7 7
4 %
Ci
t
y
Ra
n
c
h
o
M
i
r
a
g
e
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 5
2 %
0.0 4
3 1
0 9
8 %
Ci
t
y
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
Ri
ve
r
s
i
d
e
0.2 6
8 %
0.2 2
0 6
2 7
9 %
Ci
t
y
Sa
n
Jac
i
n
t
o
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 1
0 %
0.0 0
8 5
9 3
6 %
City
Te
m
e
c
u
l
a
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 2
2 %
0.0 1
8 0
0 8
6 %
City
W
i
l
d
o
m
a
r
Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
0.0 0
8 %
0.0 0
6 2
5 0
0 %
Co
un
t
y
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
Co
u
n
t
y
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
3.7 9
7 %
4.6 4
5 %
3.9 4
6 5
8 8
7 %
Do
c
u
s
i
g
n
E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
I
D
:
C
4 B
1 6
2 4
2 -
4 D
A
A
-
4 7
3 8
-
9 4
B
8 -
5 8
9 B
3 A
D
C
0 B
C
D
~ ~~
52 APPENDIX 1
10 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating SubdivisionCountyAbatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
CityCitrus HeightsSacramento0.057%0.0465312%
CityElk GroveSacramento0.130%0.1066994%
CityFolsomSacramento0.108%0.0890850%
CityGaltSacramento0.017%0.0143704%
CityRancho CordovaSacramento0.008%0.0067679%
CitySacramentoSacramento0.721%0.882%0.7496530%
CountySan Benito CountySan Benito0.106%0.130%0.1101417% CityHollisterSan Benito0.027%0.0225355%
CountySan Bernardino CountySan Bernardino3.259%3.987%3.3878124% CityAdelantoSan Bernardino0.008%0.0066640%
CityApple ValleySan Bernardino0.025%0.0207360%
CityBarstowSan Bernardino0.015%0.0122056%
CityChinoSan Bernardino0.064%0.0525893%
CityChino HillsSan Bernardino0.001%0.0006388%
CityColtonSan Bernardino0.031%0.0253443%
CityFontanaSan Bernardino0.112%0.0920543%
CityGrand TerraceSan Bernardino0.006%0.0051051%
CityHesperiaSan Bernardino0.035%0.0291522%
CityHighlandSan Bernardino0.004%0.0029061%
CityLoma LindaSan Bernardino0.009%0.0071188%
CityMontclairSan Bernardino0.039%0.0322108%
CityOntarioSan Bernardino0.179%0.1472934%
CityRancho CucamongaSan Bernardino0.084%0.0689431 %
CityRedlandsSan Bernardino0.057%0.0469150%
CityRialtoSan Bernardino0.073%0.0603206%
CitySan BernardinoSan Bernardino0.178%0.1461880%
CityTwentynine PalmsSan Bernardino0.002%0.0012605%
CityUplandSan Bernardino0.052%0.0424460%
CityVictorvilleSan Bernardino0.033%0.0269400%
CityYucaipaSan Bernardino0.016%0.0128772%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD ~ ~~
53 APPENDIX 1
11 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003%0.0021228%
County San Diego County San Diego 5.706%6.980%5.9309748% City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128%0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189%0.231%0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044%0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113%0.0933582%
City Encinitas San Diego 0.061%0.074%0.0630289%
City Escondido San Diego 0.145%0.1192204%
City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014%0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055%0.068%0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022%0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080%0.0656808%
City Oceanside San Diego 0.213%0.1753428%
City Poway San Diego 0.062%0.0511040%
City San Diego San Diego 1.975%2.416%2.0531169%
City San Marcos San Diego 0.089%0.0733897%
City Santee San Diego 0.033%0.0268401%
City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017%0.0138564%
City Vista San Diego 0.052%0.0425144%
Consolidated San Francisco San Francisco 3.026%3.702%3.1457169% County San Joaquin County San Joaquin 1.680%2.055%1.7460399% City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009%0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053%0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054%0.0443454%
City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013%0.0104219%
City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313%0.383%0.3256176%
City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084%0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 0.816%0.999%0.8484126% City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024%0.0199053%
City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029%0.0240680%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 54 APPENDIX 1
12 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)San Luis Obispo 0.043%0.0353456% City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017%0.0137881%
City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020%0.0160922%
City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077%0.0637841 %
County San Mateo County San Mateo 1.074%1.313%1.1159599% City Belmont San Mateo 0.021%0.0169860%
City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019%0.0152537%
City Daly City San Mateo 0.044%0.0363880%
City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013%0.0103982%
City Foster City San Mateo 0.020%0.0166101%
City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004%0.0031638%
City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013%0.0110029%
City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015%0.0126209%
City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013%0.0105836%
City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016%0.0130625%
City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056%0.0463511%
City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021%0.0172161%
City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013%0.0108885%
City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052%0.0425841%
City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043%0.0353943%
County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 1.132%1.385%1.1768968% City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001%0.0008938%
City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004%0.0028969%
City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047%0.0389379%
City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122%0.1004559%
City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058%0.0479179%
County Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2.404%2.941%2.4987553% City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014%0.0112566%
City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008%0.0066824%
City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025%0.0202891%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 55 APPENDIX 1
13 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013%0.0103338%
City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013%0.0103220%
City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036%0.0298120%
City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015%0.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041%0.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039%0.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294%0.360%0.3054960%
City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067%0.0549723%
City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004%0.0034161%
City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053%0.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783%0.957%0.8135396% City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020%0.0168191%
City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143%0.1180348%
City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015%0.0126525%
City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063%0.0520136%
County Shasta County Shasta 1.095%1.339%1.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024%0.0198896%
City Redding Shasta 0.284%0.2334841 %
City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004%0.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228%0.279%0.2373393%
County Solano County Solano 0.760%0.6260795%
City Benicia Solano 0.031%0.0253903%
City Dixon Solano 0.016%0.0130849%
City Fairfield Solano 0.109%0.0897317%
City Suisun City Solano 0.021%0.0176183%
City Vacaville Solano 0.119%0.0976497%
City Vallejo Solano 0.167%0.1373644%
County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218%1.490%1.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032%0.0266929%
City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081%0.0667507%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD ii·.-~
r:,-.. •
1:1--56
AP
P
E
N
D
I
X
1 14
of
15 Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Cl
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Co
u
n
t
y
Ab
ate
m
e
n
t
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
Pla
i
n
t
i
f
f
Su
bd
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
W
e
igh
t
e
d
Al
l
c
a
t
i
o
n
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
City
Ro
h
n
e
r
t
Pa
r
k
So
n
o
m
a
0.0 4
1 %
0.0 3
4 0
7 5
9 %
City
Sa
n
t
a
Ro
s
a
So
n
o
m
a
0.1 8
4 %
0.1 5
1 9
0 7
0 %
City
So
n
o
m
a
So
n
o
m
a
0.0 2
2 %
0.0 1
8 3
4 3
8 %
City
W
i
n
d
s
o
r
So
n
o
m
a
0.0 1
6 %
0.0 1
2 9
2 9
8 %
Co
un
t
y
Sta
n
i
s
l
a
u
s
Co
u
n
t
y
Sta
n
i
s
l
a
u
s
1.7 2
2 %
1.4 1
8 2
2 7
3 %
City
Ce
r
e
s
Sta
n
i
s
l
a
u
s
0.0 4
1 %
0.0 3
4 0
2 6
0 %
City
M
o
d
e
s
t
o
Sta
n
i
s
l
a
u
s
0.2 1
7 %
0.1 7
8 8
7 5
9 %
City
Ne
w
m
a
n
Sta
n
i
s
l
a
u
s
0.0 0
6 %
0.0 0
4 6
9 6
4 %
Ci
t
y
Oa
k
d
a
l
e
Sta
n
i
s
l
a
u
s
0.0 1
8 %
0.0 1
4 5
5 3
1 %
City
Pa
t
t
e
r
s
o
n
Sta
n
i
s
l
a
u
s
0.0 1
5 %
0.0 1
2 6
5 9
0 %
Ci
t
y
Ri
v
e
r
b
a
n
k
Sta
n
i
s
l
a
u
s
0.0 1
0 %
0.0 0
8 5
6 9
9 %
City
Tu
r
l
o
c
k
Sta
n
i
s
l
a
u
s
0.0 6
5 %
0.0 5
3 1
9 6
6 %
Co
un
t
y
Su
t
t
e
r
Co
u
n
t
y
Su
t
t
e
r
0.3 0
6 %
0.3 7
4 %
0.3 1
7 9
5 4
8 %
City
Yu
b
a
Cit
y
Su
t
t
e
r
0.0 7
4 %
0.0 6
0 6
2 4
2 %
Co
un
t
y
Te
h
a
m
a
Co
u
n
t
y
Te
h
a
m
a
0.2 1
3 %
0.2 6
1 %
0.2 2
1 6
6 5
4 %
City
Re
d
Blu
f
f
Te
h
a
m
a
0.0 1
4 %
0.0 1
1 7
7 7
1 %
Co
un
t
y
Tr
i
n
i
t
y
Co
u
n
t
y
Tr
ini
t
y
0.0 8
2 %
0.1 0
1 %
0.0 8
5 5
4 7
6 %
Co
un
t
y
Tu
l
a
r
e
Co
u
n
t
y
Tu
l
a
r
e
0.8 0
9 %
0.9 9
0 %
0.8 4
1 0
9 4
9 %
Ci
t
y
Di
n
u
b
a
Tu
l
a
r
e
0.0 1
4 %
0.0 1
1 6
9 2
9 %
City
Ex
e
t
e
r
Tu
l
a
r
e
0.0 0
4 %
0.0 0
3 2
4 7
9 %
Ci
t
y
Fa
r
m
e
r
s
v
i
l
l
e
Tu
l
a
r
e
0.0 0
3 %
0.0 0
2 7
8 7
9 %
City
Lin
d
s
a
y
Tu
l
a
r
e
0.0 0
7 %
0.0 0
5 7
1 1
1 %
Ci
t
y
Po
r
t
e
r
v
i
l
l
e
Tu
l
a
r
e
0.0 2
1 %
0.0 1
7 1
8 4
5 %
City
Tu
l
a
r
e
Tu
l
a
r
e
0.0 3
7 %
0.0 3
0 2
2 7
3 %
Ci
t
y
Vi
s
a
l
i
a
Tu
l
a
r
e
0.0 6
6 %
0.0 5
4 5
8 7
2 %
Co
un
t
y
Tu
o
l
u
m
n
e
Co
u
n
t
y
Tu
o
l
u
m
n
e
0.4 8
6 %
0.5 9
4 %
0.5 0
4 7
6 2
1 %
Co
un
t
y
Ve
n
t
u
r
a
Co
u
n
t
y
Ve
n
t
u
r
a
2.1 9
2 %
2.6 8
1 %
2.2 7
8 1
2 0
1 %
City
Ca
m
a
r
i
l
l
o
Ve
n
t
u
r
a
0.0 0
2 %
0.0 0
1 2
8 1
5 %
City
Fil
l
m
o
r
e
Ve
n
t
u
r
a
0.0 0
2 %
0.0 0
2 0
2 9
4 %
City
M
o
o
r
p
a
r
k
Ve
n
t
u
r
a
0.0 0
8 %
0.0 0
6 7
3 3
7 %
Do
c
u
s
i
g
n
E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
I
D
:
C
4 B
1 6
2 4
2 -
4 D
A
A
-
4 7
3 8
-
9 4
B
8 -
5 8
9 B
3 A
D
C
0 B
C
D
ti
57 APPENDIX 1
15 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Oxnard Ventura 0.156%0.190%0.1617338%
City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021%0.0174145%
City San Buenaventura (Ventura)Ventura 0.085%0.0702181% City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014%0.0119072%
City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065%0.0533043%
City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022%0.0179902%
County Yolo County Yolo 0.357%0.437%0.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055%0.0451747%
City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066%0.0544321%
City Woodland Yolo 0.058%0.0477904%
County Yuba County Yuba 0.214%0.262%0.2225679%
City Marysville Yuba 0.014%0.0112079%
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 58 1
APPENDIX 2
CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political subdivisions eligible to participate in the Purdue/Sackler settlement and their counsel.
In light of the Order, and at the request of [SUBDIVISION], the [SUBDIVISION], its counsel [COUNSEL], and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of California, are entering into this California-Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop Agreement). [SUBDIVISION] and [COUNSEL] intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a State Back- Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses and Costs) of the Governmental Entity & Shareholder Settlement Agreement (GESA).
Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Governing Documents and California Purdue/Sackler State-Subdivision Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the CA Subdivision Fund of the Purdue/Sackler settlement to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL] from [SUBDIVISION’S] CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out of the [SUBDIVISION’S] 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such payments, together with any contingency-fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the [SUBDIVISION’S] total gross recovery from the Purdue/Sackler settlement. [SUBDIVISION] further certifies that any payments made under this Backstop Agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid Abatement use requirements under Section 5.02 A of the GESA and Section 4.01(f)(i) of the Master Settlement Agreement.
[COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund created under the Governing Documents before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.
The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State Back- Stop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Governmental Entity & Shareholder Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD 59 2
[DATE][SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE][COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE][ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
Docusign Envelope ID: C4B16242-4DAA-4738-94B8-589B3ADC0BCD ii l!I ·_ 60
City Council Staff Report
Rancho Mirage Energy Authority (RMEA) 2024 Power Source Disclosure Attestation
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5F.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Jessica Pulliam, Deputy of Sustainability
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve providing attestation for Rancho Mirage Energy Authority's 2024 Power Source Disclosure (PSD) Annual Report as specified under California’s PSD Program.
DISCUSSION
The Rancho Mirage Energy Authority (RMEA) is required under California’s Power Source Disclosure Program to submit an attestation from its governing body confirming the accuracy of the annual Power Source Disclosure (PSD) Report filed with the California Energy Commission (CEC).
The PSD Program requires retail electricity providers to issue Power Content Labels (PCLs), consumer-facing disclosures analogous to nutrition labels, showing the mix of renewable and conventional energy resources procured each year.
For 2024, RMEA’s portfolios reflect significant renewable procurement:
Base Choice Customers: 46% of total energy supply was sourced from CEC-certified renewable resources.
Green Choice Customers (previously known as Premium Renewable): 100% of total energy supply was sourced from renewable resources.
While developing RMEA’s data for the 2024 PCL, RMEA’s technical consultants conducted a detailed review of all power purchases completed for the 2024 calendar year. Their review, along with staff’s technical review, found no inaccuracies or inconsistencies in the reported information. This verified data was entered into RMEA’s annual PSD Report and forms the basis of the 2024 PCL.
CEC staff will provide the 2024 PCLs by mid-September 2025. RMEA must post its PCL on the City’s energy website by October 1, 2025, and deliver it to all customers by December 31, 2025.
To complete this requirement, the City Council must provide formal attestation confirming the accuracy of the 2024 PSD Annual Report submitted earlier this year. Upon approval, a copy of this staff report and related meeting minutes will be forwarded to the CEC, thereby completing RMEA’s attestation requirements under California’s Power Source Disclosure Program for the 2024 calendar year.
61 FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - RMEA 2024 PSD Annual Report
62 Version: April 2025
Submit the Annual Report and signed Attestation in PDF format with the Excel version of the Annual Report to [email protected]. Remember to complete the Retail Supplier Name and contact information above.
NOTE: Information submitted in this report is not automatically held confidential. If your company wishes the information submitted to be considered confidential an authorizedrepresentativemustsubmitanapplicationforconfidentialdesignation California Energy Commission's website.
If you have questions, contact Power Source Disclosure (PSD) staff at [email protected] or (916) 639-0573.
EMAIL [email protected]
WEBSITE URL
FOR PCL
POSTING
https://ranchomirageenergy.org/
MAILING 1839 Iron Point Road, Suite 120
CITY, STATE, ZIP Folsom, CA 95630
PHONE 916-936-3300
TITLE Consultant
2024 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT
For the Year Ending December 31, 2024
Retail suppliers are required to use the posted template and are not allowed to make edits to this format. Please complete all requested information.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
RETAIL SUPPLIER NAME
Rancho Mirage Energy Authority
CONTACT INFORMATION
NAME Kirby Dusel
ATTACHMENT 1
63 Annual Data
Instructions:
1. Enter the electricity portfolio name in cell O25 and additional electricity portfolio names as needed in cells P25-V25.
2. Enter information about all power procurements and retail sales. Insert additional rows as needed. All fields in white should be filled out. Fields in grey auto-populate as needed and should not be filled out.
3. For all specified purchases, enter the facility name, fuel type, state or province, WREGIS ID of REC source, RPS ID of REC source, EIA ID of delivered energy, gross MWhs procured, and specified resales MWhs.
4. For firmed-&-shaped procurements specifically, enter all fields from step 3. Additionally, enter the EIA ID of the substitute power in the "EIA ID of delivered energy" field and select "Yes" in the "Firmed-&-Shaped Resource?" field. If the associated GHG emissions are eligible for firmed-&-shaped grandfathering, select "Yes" in th
5. Proxy EIA IDs for unspecified power and specified system mixes from asset-controlling suppliers have been provided. Enter "Unspecified Power", "BPA", or "Tacoma Power" as applicable.
6. Proxy EIA IDs for aggregated reporting of WAPA CVP or PCIA resoures; Enter "CVP", "PCIA Solar", "PCIA Wind", "PCIA Eligible Hydro", or "PCIA Large Hydro" as applicable.
7. Procurements of unspecified power must not be entered as line items below; unspecified power will be calculated automatically in the individual electricity portfolio tables to the rightafter all specified resources have been allocated.
8. Allocate net MWhs procured to each electricity portfolio until the loads are balanced across each portfolio. If the total Net MWhs Procured exceeds the total retail sales of all portfolios, allocate only enough MWh to meet the retail sales of each portfolio.
Over allocation
check ✓
Under allocation
check ✓
Coal check ✓
Negative
oversupply check ✓
Retail Sales 1920.909 271792.328
Unmet Load 0 144724 0 0
Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province
WREGIS ID
of REC
source
RPS ID of
REC
source
EIA ID of
delivered
energy
Gross
MWhs
Procured
Specified
Resales
MWhs
Net MWhs
Procured
Firmed &
Shaped
Resource?
Eligible for Firmed
& Shaped
Grandfathering?
Total EF
(MT
CO2e/MWh)
Total
GHGs
PCL EF
(MT
CO2e/MWh)
Premium
Renewable Choice Base Choice Electricity Portfolio
#3 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#4 Name
67RK 8ME, LLC - Redcrest Solar Farm Solar CA W4780 62642A 58831 47 47 0.0000 0.0000 47 Adelanto Solar II, LLC - Adelanto Solar Solar CA W4683 62640A 59440 29 29 0.0000 0.0000 29 Adelanto Solar, LLC - Adelanto Solar, LSolar CA W4758 62639A 59441 82 82 0.0000 0.0000 82 Adera Solar, LLC - Adera Solar, LLC Solar CA W4836 61388A 60027 26 26 0.0000 0.0000 26 Adobe Solar, LLC - Adobe Solar, LLC Solar CA W4119 61427A 57651 85 85 0.0000 0.0000 85 Algonquin SKIC 10 Solar, LLC - AlgonqSolar CA W5392 62879A 60242 23 23 0.0000 0.0000 23 Alta Wind I - Alta Wind I Wind CA W1727 60794A 57282 641 641 0.0000 0.0000 641 Alta Wind II - Alta Wind II Wind CA W1841 60795A 57291 1014 1014 0.0000 0.0000 1014 Alta Wind III - Alta Wind III Wind CA W1842 61092A 57292 657 657 0.0000 0.0000 657 Alta Wind IV - Alta Wind IV Wind CA W2013 61093A 57293 286 286 0.0000 0.0000 286 Alta Wind IX - Alta 9 Wind CA W2904 61808A P346 348 348 0.0000 0.0000 348 Alta Wind V - Alta Wind V Wind CA W2068 61094A 57294 425 425 0.0000 0.0000 425 Alta Wind VII - Alta 7 Wind CA W2905 61807A P345 458 458 0.0000 0.0000 458 Alta Wind VIII - Alta Wind VIII Wind CA W2483 61288A 57835 331 331 0.0000 0.0000 331 Alta Wind X, LLC - Alta Wind X, LLC Wind CA W3537 62244A 58394 585 585 0.0000 0.0000 585 Alta Wind XI, LLC - Alta Wind XI, LLC Wind CA W3538 62245A 58395 397 397 0.0000 0.0000 397 American Kings Solar Project - AmericaSolar CA W11005 61600A 60777 509 509 0.0000 0.0000 509 American Solar Greenworks, LLC - SumSolar CA W4524 61506A 58757 15 15 0.0000 0.0000 15 Bishop Creek 2 - Bishop Creek - Unit 3Eligible Hydroelectric CA W545 60444A 323 8 8 0.0000 0.0000 8 Bishop Creek 2 - Bishop Creek 2 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W320 60444A 323 8 8 0.0000 0.0000 8 Bishop Creek 2 - Bishop Creek 2 - Unit Eligible Hydroelectric CA W544 60444A 323 8 8 0.0000 0.0000 8 Bishop Creek 3 - Bishop Creek 3 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W321 60446A 324 30 30 0.0000 0.0000 30 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W322 60447A 325 7 7 0.0000 0.0000 7 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 - Unit Eligible Hydroelectric CA W548 60447A 325 7 7 0.0000 0.0000 7 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 - Unit Eligible Hydroelectric CA W549 60447A 325 14 14 0.0000 0.0000 14 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 - Unit Eligible Hydroelectric CA W550 60447A 325 16 16 0.0000 0.0000 16 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 - Unit Eligible Hydroelectric CA W551 60447A 325 14 14 0.0000 0.0000 14 Bishop Creek 5 - Bishop Creek 5 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W323 60448A 326 9 9 0.0000 0.0000 9 Bishop Creek 5 - Bishop Creek 5 - Unit Eligible Hydroelectric CA W552 60448A 326 11 11 0.0000 0.0000 11 Bishop Creek 6 - Bishop Creek 6 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W324 60449A 327 16 16 0.0000 0.0000 16 Blythe Solar II, LLC - Blythe Solar II, LLSolar CA W5072 63129A 60092 143 143 0.0000 0.0000 143 Blythe Solar II, LLC - Blythe Solar II, LLSolar CA W5073 63129A 60092 145 145 0.0000 0.0000 145 Blythe Solar II, LLC - Blythe Solar II, LLSolar CA W5222 63129A 60092 138 138 0.0000 0.0000 138 Blythe Solar II, LLC - Blythe Solar II, LLSolar CA W5248 63129A 60092 112 112 0.0000 0.0000 112 Blythe Solar III, LLC - Blythe Solar III, LSolar CA W10157 63130A 60094 567 567 0.0000 0.0000 181.909 385 Borden Solar Farm - Borden Solar FarmSolar CA W10139 61829A 59531 177 177 0.0000 0.0000 177 Broadview Energy KW, LLC - BEKW Wind NM W5278 62643A 60152 890 890 0.0000 0.0000 890 Broadview Energy, JN LLC - BEJN Wind NM W5277 63162A 60145 1124 1124 0.0000 0.0000 1124 California PV Energy at Jurupa - CalifoSolar CA W3924 62287A 58582 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Cape Scott Wind - Cape Scott Wind Wind BC W3959 60600A P149 1551 1551 0.0000 0.0000 1551 Catalina Solar 2, LLC - Catalina Solar 2Solar CA W4263 62428A 59334 82 82 0.0000 0.0000 82 CED Atwell Island West - CED Atwell IsSolar CA W4691 62468A 59414 72 72 0.0000 0.0000 72 CED Corcoran Solar 2, LLC - CED Cor Solar CA W4681 61820A 59413 70 70 0.0000 0.0000 70 CED Ducor Solar 1, LLC - CED Ducor SSolar CA W5350 62882A 60078 54 54 0.0000 0.0000 54 CED Ducor Solar 2, LLC - CED Ducor SSolar CA W5351 62881A 60079 54 54 0.0000 0.0000 54 CED Ducor Solar 3, LLC - CED Ducor SSolar CA W5353 62884A 60080 61 61 0.0000 0.0000 61 CED Ducor Solar 4, LLC - CED Ducor SSolar CA W5352 62883A 60081 80 80 0.0000 0.0000 80 CED Wistaria Solar, LLC - Wistaria RanSolar CA W7130 62623A 61750 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Central Antelope Dry Ranch C, LLC - CSolar CA W5006 61324A 59963 50 50 0.0000 0.0000 50 64 Chetwynd Biomass - West Fraser - CheBiomass & Biogas BC W5315 64689A P387 4 4 1.0539 4 0.1795 4 Citizen Solar B, LLC - Citizen Solar B Solar CA W4840 61488A 62052 6 6 0.0000 0.0000 6 Copper Mountain Solar 4 - Copper MouSolar NV W5023 62662A 59814 328 328 0.0000 0.0000 328 Coronal Lost Hills, LLC - Coronal Lost HSolar CA W4631 62235A 59638 58 58 0.0000 0.0000 58 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, Solar CA W4849 60936A 58646 117 117 0.0000 0.0000 117 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, Solar CA W4881 60936A 58646 117 117 0.0000 0.0000 117 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, Solar CA W4882 60936A 58646 105 105 0.0000 0.0000 105 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, Solar CA W4914 60936A 58646 117 117 0.0000 0.0000 117 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, Solar CA W4946 60936A 58646 117 117 0.0000 0.0000 117 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, Solar CA W4965 60936A 58646 117 117 0.0000 0.0000 117 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, Solar CA W5021 60936A 58646 77 77 0.0000 0.0000 77 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, Solar CA W5067 60936A 58646 40 40 0.0000 0.0000 40 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, Solar CA W5068 60936A 58646 105 105 0.0000 0.0000 105 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 2 Solar CA W3965 60940A 58542 135 135 0.0000 0.0000 135 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 2 Solar CA W3966 60940A 58542 135 135 0.0000 0.0000 135 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 2 Solar CA W4097 60940A 58542 91 91 0.0000 0.0000 91 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 2 Solar CA W4098 60940A 58542 48 48 0.0000 0.0000 48 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 2 Solar CA W4189 60940A 58542 99 99 0.0000 0.0000 99 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 2 Solar CA W4453 60940A 58542 87 87 0.0000 0.0000 87 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 2 Solar CA W3884 60940A 58542 265 265 0.0000 0.0000 265 DESERT SUNLIGHT 300, LLC - DSL-BSolar CA W3798 61068A 57993 172 172 0.0000 0.0000 172 DG Solar Lessee II, LLC - E Philadelph Solar CA W4926 62721A 59916 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 2 Dokie Wind - Dokie Wind Wind BC W1992 61360A P150 850 850 0.0000 0.0000 850 Duran Mesa LLC - Duran Mesa LLC Wind NM W12070 64728A 64065 6262 6262 0.0000 0.0000 6262 El Cabo Wind - El Cabo Wind Wind NM W5788 62786A 58098 1755 1755 0.0000 0.0000 1755 Fontana - Fontana Eligible Hydroelectric CA W326 60451A 332 13 13 0.0000 0.0000 13 Freeway Springs, LLC - Freeway SprinSolar CA W5385 63031A 60183 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 FTS Master Tenant 1, LLC - A - FTS MSolar CA W4180 61318A 58761 7 7 0.0000 0.0000 7 FTS Master Tenant 1, LLC - B - FTS MSolar CA W4181 61319A 58762 7 7 0.0000 0.0000 7 Garnet Solar Power Generation StationSolar CA W4506 61182A 58528 13 13 0.0000 0.0000 13 Golden Solar, LLC - Dulles - Golden SoSolar CA W5227 63030A 60182 3 3 0.0000 0.0000 3 Golden Springs Building F, LLC - GoldeSolar CA W5479 63032A 60151 3 3 0.0000 0.0000 3 Golden Springs Development CompanySolar CA W4609 62745A 58913 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Golden Springs Development CompanySolar CA W4610 62746A 58912 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Golden Springs Development CompanySolar CA W5480 63033A 60153 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Golden Springs Development CompanySolar CA W5481 63034A 60154 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 2 Great Valley Solar 3, LLC - RE Tranqui Solar CA W5866 63281A 59939 85 85 0.0000 0.0000 85 Highlander Solar 1, LLC - Highlander S Solar CA W3663 61157A 58234 51 51 0.0000 0.0000 51 Highlander Solar 2, LLC - Highlander S Solar CA W3664 61158A 58227 37 37 0.0000 0.0000 37 Imperial Valley Solar 3, LLC - Mount SiSolar CA W7036 61649A 61202 935 935 0.0000 0.0000 935 Jacumba Solar, LLC - Jacumba Solar FSolar CA W5601 63057A 60947 75 75 0.0000 0.0000 75 Kaweah 2 - Kaweah 2 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W328 60453A 336 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 2 Kern River 1 - Kern River 1 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W330 60455A 340 283 283 0.0000 0.0000 283 Lancaster Dry Farm Ranch B, LLC - La Solar CA W4418 61315A 58750 12 12 0.0000 0.0000 12 Lancaster Little Rock C LLC - LancasteSolar CA W4492 61311A 59262 5 5 0.0000 0.0000 5 Lone Valley Solar Park I, LLC - Lone VSolar CA W4427 61458A 58417 36 36 0.0000 0.0000 36 Lone Valley Solar Park II, LLC - Lone VSolar CA W4428 61452A 59237 76 76 0.0000 0.0000 76 Longboat Solar, LLC - Longboat Solar, Solar CA W5306 62805A 60485 65 65 0.0000 0.0000 65 Lundy - Lundy Eligible Hydroelectric CA W331 60456A 342 6 6 0.0000 0.0000 6 Lundy - Lundy - Unit 2 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W560 60456A 342 6 6 0.0000 0.0000 6 Lytle Creek - Lytle Creek Eligible Hydroelectric CA W391 60457A P348 3 3 0.0000 0.0000 3 Mammoth Pacific L. P. (MP1) - MammoGeothermal CA W417 60306A 10480 301 301 0.0757 23 0.0000 301 Manzana - Manzana Wind LLC Wind CA W3105 61671A 57484 15832 15832 0.0000 0.0000 960 14872 Master Development - Corona, CA (135Solar CA W3497 61735A P306 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 2 Maverick Solar, LLC - Maverick Solar, LSolar CA W10973 63321A 62178 588 588 0.0000 0.0000 588 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SoSolar CA W4935 62091A 58462 171 171 0.0000 0.0000 171 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SoSolar CA W4936 62091A 58462 85 85 0.0000 0.0000 85 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SoSolar CA W5016 62091A 58462 78 78 0.0000 0.0000 78 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SoSolar CA W4763 62091A 58462 128 128 0.0000 0.0000 128 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SoSolar CA W4826 62091A 58462 128 128 0.0000 0.0000 128 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SoSolar CA W4827 62091A 58462 110 110 0.0000 0.0000 110 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SoSolar CA W4879 62091A 58462 171 171 0.0000 0.0000 171 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SoSolar CA W4630 62091A 58462 149 149 0.0000 0.0000 149 Meikle Wind - Meikle Wind Wind BC W5189 63268A P151 444 444 0.0000 0.0000 444 Mesquite Solar 2, LLC - Mesquite SolarSolar AZ W5299 62664A 60307 433 433 0.0000 0.0000 433 Mill Creek 3 - Mill Creek 3 - Unit 3 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W332 60459A 7147 5 5 0.0000 0.0000 5 Mill Creek 3 - Mill Creek 3 - Unit 4 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W555 60459A 7147 5 5 0.0000 0.0000 5 Mill Creek 3 - Mill Creek 3 - Unit 5 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W556 60459A 7147 5 5 0.0000 0.0000 5 Moose Lake Wind - Moose Lake Wind Wind BC W7518 64287A P152 82 82 0.0000 0.0000 82 Mound Solar Partnership XI, LLC - AnteSolar CA W5744 63713A 60085 7 7 0.0000 0.0000 7 Mount Signal Solar Farm II - Mount Sig Solar CA W7762 61648A 61353 635 635 0.0000 0.0000 635 Mountain View III - Mountain View Pow Wind CA W234 60430A 56112 20402 20402 0.0000 0.0000 20402 Mustang Hills, LLC - Mustang Hills, LLCWind CA W2482 61287A 57833 453 453 0.0000 0.0000 453 Nicolis, LLC - Nicolis Solar PV Plant Solar CA W5131 61667A 59600 59 59 0.0000 0.0000 59 North Lancaster Ranch, LLC - North LaSolar CA W5386 61538A 59962 55 55 0.0000 0.0000 55 North Rosamond Solar, LLC - North RoSolar CA W7426 62290A 59879 617 617 0.0000 0.0000 617 NRG Solar Oasis LLC - Oasis Solar Solar CA W4700 62514A 59528 80 80 0.0000 0.0000 80 Oasis Alta - Oasis Alta Wind CA W11031 64522A 63941 10829 10829 0.0000 0.0000 10829 Oltmans SCE at Champagne - CalifornSolar CA W3923 62292A 58581 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 2 Ontario 1 - Ontario 1 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W393 60460A P350 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Ontario 2 - Ontario 2 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W394 60461A P351 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 2 Orion Solar II, LLC - Orion Solar II, LLCSolar CA W4186 61571A 58721 29 29 0.0000 0.0000 29 Ormat Dixie Valley, LLC - Ormat Dixie VGeothermal NV W334 60313A 52015 460 460 0.0242 11 0.0000 460 Ormat Dixie Valley, LLC - Ormat Dixie VGeothermal NV W7146 60313A 52015 44 44 0.0242 1 0.0000 44 Panoche Valley Solar - Panoche ValleySolar CA W5851 60858A 57340 191 191 0.0000 0.0000 191 Panoche Valley Solar - Panoche ValleySolar CA W7275 60858A 57340 135 135 0.0000 0.0000 135 Panoche Valley Solar - Phase 2 Solar CA W7186 60858A 57340 107 107 0.0000 0.0000 107 Park Meridian 1 - Kona Solar, LLC - Pa Solar CA W4577 62502A 59539 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Pennask Wind Farm - Pennask Wind F Wind BC W5499 64015A P153 57 57 0.0000 0.0000 57 Point Wind 2 - Point Wind 2 Wind CA W11030 64508A P366 8456 8456 0.0000 0.0000 8456 Poole - Poole Eligible Hydroelectric CA W338 60462A 353 34 34 0.0000 0.0000 34 65 Portal - Portal Eligible Hydroelectric CA W339 60463A 354 28 28 0.0000 0.0000 28 Portal Ridge Solar B, LLC - Portal Ridg Solar CA W5546 62835A 60310 73 73 0.0000 0.0000 73 Porterville - SPVP042 - Porterville - SPSolar CA W1977 61241A 58309 11 11 0.0000 0.0000 11 Potrero Hills Energy Producers - Potrer Biomass & Biogas CA W4867 63116A 59952 367 367 0.5638 207 0.0029 367 Pumpjack Solar - Pumpjack Solar Solar CA W4413 61368A 59322 71 71 0.0000 0.0000 71 Quality Wind - Quality Wind Wind BC W3160 62247A P154 1962 1962 0.0000 0.0000 1962 Rancho Cucamonga Distribution Cente Solar CA W4579 62498A 59540 5 5 0.0000 0.0000 5 RE Adams East, LLC - RE Adams EastSolar CA W4344 61266A 58984 61 61 0.0000 0.0000 61 RE Columbia 3 LLC - RE Columbia 3 L Solar CA W3898 61162A 58502 36 36 0.0000 0.0000 36 RE Garland A - Garland A Solar CA W5005 62818A 60386 90 90 0.0000 0.0000 90 RE Rio Grande, LLC - RE Rio Grande, Solar CA W3896 60823A 58500 16 16 0.0000 0.0000 16 RE Rosamond Two LLC - RE RosamonSolar CA W3899 60856A 58499 71 71 0.0000 0.0000 71 RE Tranquillity - RE Tranquillity Solar CA W4898 61269A 59939 779 779 0.0000 0.0000 779 RE Victor Phelan Solar One LLC - RE VSolar CA W3897 60838A 58202 66 66 0.0000 0.0000 66 Regulus Solar, LLC - Regulus Solar, LLSolar CA W4387 61428A 57650 229 229 0.0000 0.0000 229 Rio Bravo Solar I - Rio Bravo Solar I Solar CA W5346 61369A 59249 81 81 0.0000 0.0000 81 Rio Bravo Solar II - Rio Bravo Solar II Solar CA W5371 62716A 59250 79 79 0.0000 0.0000 79 Rising Tree Wind Farm III LLC - Rising Wind CA W4612 62469A 59236 409 409 0.0000 0.0000 409 Rising Tree Wind Farm LLC - Rising Tr Wind CA W4444 62425A 57621 386 386 0.0000 0.0000 386 Rush Creek - Rush Creek Eligible Hydroelectric CA W340 60464A 357 29 29 0.0000 0.0000 29 Rush Creek - Rush Creek - Unit 2 Eligible Hydroelectric CA W557 60464A 357 35 35 0.0000 0.0000 35 SE Athos I - SE Athos I, LLC Solar CA W12610 63755A 63300 10500 10500 0.0000 0.0000 10500 SEPV Mojave West, LLC - SEPV MojavSolar CA W5047 61156A 59740 84 84 0.0000 0.0000 84 SEPV Palmdale East, LLC - SEPV PalmSolar CA W4713 61154A 59273 39 39 0.0000 0.0000 39 Shiloh Wind Project 2, LLC - Shiloh WinWind CA W811 60639A 56874 10247 10247 0.0000 0.0000 10247 Shinish Creek Wind Farm - Shinish CreWind BC W5500 64041A P160 50 50 0.0000 0.0000 50 Sierra - Sierra Eligible Hydroelectric CA W390 60467A P352 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Sierra Pacific Burney Facility - Sierra PBiomass & Biogas CA W667 60087A 50110 244 244 0.4729 115 0.0092 244 Sierra Pacific Ind. (Lincoln) - Sierra PacBiomass & Biogas CA W668 60088A 10144 235 235 0.4928 116 0.0113 235 Sierra Pacific Ind. (Quincy) - Sierra PacBiomass & Biogas CA W669 60089A 50112 586 586 2.3575 1381 0.0499 586 Sierra Pacific Sonora - Sierra Pacific SoBiomass & Biogas CA W852 60576A 54517 80 80 3.6356 291 0.0784 80 Sierra Solar Greenworks - Sierra Solar Solar CA W4811 61334A 59431 59 59 0.0000 0.0000 59 Silver State Solar Power South, Block 2Solar NV W4876 61050A 58644 250 250 0.0000 0.0000 250 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - SSolar NV W4829 61050A 58644 101 101 0.0000 0.0000 101 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - SSolar NV W4878 61050A 58644 137 137 0.0000 0.0000 137 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - SSolar NV W4947 61050A 58644 135 135 0.0000 0.0000 135 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - SSolar NV W4966 61050A 58644 107 107 0.0000 0.0000 107 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - SSolar NV W5063 61050A 58644 227 227 0.0000 0.0000 227 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - SSolar NV W5064 61050A 58644 4 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Solar Partners I, LLC - Ivanpah 2 Solar CA W4025 62274A 57073 396 396 0.0894 35 0.0894 396 Solar Star California XIII, LLC - Quinto Solar CA W4825 61362A 59339 393 393 0.0000 0.0000 393 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SSolar CA W4641 61363A 58388 228 228 0.0000 0.0000 228 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SSolar CA W4562 61363A 58388 228 228 0.0000 0.0000 228 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SSolar CA W4393 61363A 58388 247 247 0.0000 0.0000 247 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SSolar CA W4678 61363A 58388 105 105 0.0000 0.0000 105 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SSolar CA W4064 61363A 58388 160 160 0.0000 0.0000 160 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SSolar CA W4392 61363A 58388 63 63 0.0000 0.0000 63 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SSolar CA W4099 61363A 58388 276 276 0.0000 0.0000 276 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SSolar CA W4243 61364A 58389 240 240 0.0000 0.0000 240 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SSolar CA W4457 61364A 58389 221 221 0.0000 0.0000 221 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SSolar CA W4458 61364A 58389 191 191 0.0000 0.0000 191 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SSolar CA W4679 61364A 58389 162 162 0.0000 0.0000 162 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SSolar CA W4065 61364A 58389 151 151 0.0000 0.0000 151 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SSolar CA W4100 61364A 58389 135 135 0.0000 0.0000 135 SPI Anderson 2 - SPI Anderson 2 Biomass & Biogas CA W4674 61146A 59658 247 247 0.3893 96 0.0105 247 Stockton Biomass - Stockton Biomass Biomass & Biogas CA W3540 60964A 54238 1884 1884 1.4585 2748 0.0288 1884 Sun Streams, LLC - Sun Streams, LLCSolar AZ W8859 62673A 60827 659 659 0.0000 0.0000 659 SunE Solar XV Lessor, LLC - HesperiaSolar CA W4261 62236A 59182 5 5 0.0000 0.0000 5 SunE Solar XVI Lessor, LLC - SunE - PSolar CA W4804 62725A P304 3 3 0.0000 0.0000 3 SunE Solar XVI Lessor, LLC - SunE - RSolar CA W5219 62719A 60032 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 Sunray Energy 3, LLC - Sunray Energy Solar CA W465 63260A 10438 58 58 0.0000 0.0000 58 Sunshine Valley Solar - Sunshine Valle Solar NV W8128 62772A 59826 411 411 0.0000 0.0000 411 TA-High Desert - Antelope Power PlantSolar CA W3496 60937A 58149 84 84 0.0000 0.0000 84 Terra Francesco 1 - Kona Solar, LLC - Solar CA W4578 62503A 59541 3 3 0.0000 0.0000 3 Tropico, LLC - Tropico Solar PV Plant Solar CA W5132 61700A 59599 41 41 0.0000 0.0000 41 Tule Wind, LLC - Tule Wind, LLC Wind CA W5902 63271A 57913 497 497 0.0000 0.0000 497 Valentine Solar, LLC - Valentine Solar, Solar CA W8806 63026A 62288 453 453 0.0000 0.0000 453 Vega Solar, LLC - Vega Solar, LLC Solar CA W4543 61942A 59555 79 79 0.0000 0.0000 79 Victor Dry Farm Ranch A LLC - Victor DSolar CA W4573 61331A 58418 15 15 0.0000 0.0000 15 Victor Dry Farm Ranch B LLC - Victor DSolar CA W4574 61332A 58419 15 15 0.0000 0.0000 15 Voyager Wind I - Voyager Wind I Wind CA W8807 63262A 60594 616 616 0.0000 0.0000 616 Wildwood Solar - Wildwood Solar Solar CA W4414 61367A 59380 64 64 0.0000 0.0000 64 Wildwood Solar II - Wildwood Solar II Solar CA W5374 62418A 59253 60 60 0.0000 0.0000 60 Willow Springs 2 - Willow Springs 2 Solar CA W7213 62286A 60324 371 371 0.0000 0.0000 371 Windstar - Windstar1 Wind CA W2742 60810A 57774 181 181 0.0000 0.0000 181 Windstar - Windstar2 Wind CA W2743 60810A 57774 208 208 0.0000 0.0000 208 Big Creek 3 Large Hydroelectric CA 319 11579 6492 5088 0.0000 0.0000 5088 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Nuclear CA 6008 19133 19133 0.0000 0.0000 GCPD - Priest Rapids & Wanapum Large Hydroelectric WA 3887 965 965 0.0000 0.0000 965 66 Premium Renewable Choice Portfolio Totals PCL Data Base Choice Portfolio Totals PCL Data Retail Sales 1921 Retail Sales 271792
Total Specified 1921 Total Specified 127069
Biomass & Biogas 0 0%Biomass & Biogas 3647 1%
Geothermal 0 0%Geothermal 805 0%
he relevant field Eligible Hydroelectric 0 0%Eligible Hydroelectric 612 0% Solar 961 50%Solar 28227 10%
Wind 960 50%Wind 87725 32%
Large Hydroelectric 0 0%Large Hydroelectric 6053 2%
Nuclear 0 0%Nuclear 0 0%
Emerging Technologies 0 0%Emerging Technologies 0 0%
Other 0 0%Other 0 0%
Natural Gas 0 0%Natural Gas 0 0%
Coal & Petroleum 0 0%Coal & Petroleum 0 0%
Unspecified Power - ACS 0 Unspecified Power - ACS 0
Unspecified Power - Spot Market 0 Unspecified Power - Spot Market 144724 Unspecified Power - Total 0 0%Unspecified Power - Total 144724 53% Total PCL GHGs (MT CO2e)0.0 Total PCL GHGs (MT CO2e)62076.1 Emissions intensity (MT CO2e/MWh)0.000 Emissions intensity (MT CO2e/MWh)0.228 PCL GHG Intensity (lbs CO2e/MWh)0 PCL GHG Intensity (lbs CO2e/MWh)504 Unbundled REC %
0%
Unbundled REC %
1%
0 0 0 0 Premium Renewable Choice Base Choice
Electricity Portfolio
#5 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#6 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#7 Name
Electricity Portfolio
#8 Name Remainder/Oversupply Facility Name Fuel Type Net Procurement Annual
PCL
GHGs (MT
CO2e)
Facility Name Fuel Type Net Procurement
Annual
PCL
GHGs (MT
CO2e)
--- 0 67RK 8ME, LLC - Redcrest Solar Farm Solar 47 0
- - -0 Adelanto Solar II, LLC - Adelanto Solar IISolar 29 0 - - -0 Adelanto Solar, LLC - Adelanto Solar, LL Solar 82 0 --- 0 Adera Solar, LLC - Adera Solar, LLC Solar 26 0
--- 0 Adobe Solar, LLC - Adobe Solar, LLC Solar 85 0
- - -0 Algonquin SKIC 10 Solar, LLC - AlgonquSolar 23 0 - - - 0 Alta Wind I - Alta Wind I Wind 641 0
- - - 0 Alta Wind II - Alta Wind II Wind 1014 0
- - - 0 Alta Wind III - Alta Wind III Wind 657 0
- - - 0 Alta Wind IV - Alta Wind IV Wind 286 0
--- 0 Alta Wind IX - Alta 9 Wind 348 0
--- 0 Alta Wind V - Alta Wind V Wind 425 0
--- 0 Alta Wind VII - Alta 7 Wind 458 0
--- 0 Alta Wind VIII - Alta Wind VIII Wind 331 0
--- 0 Alta Wind X, LLC - Alta Wind X, LLC Wind 585 0
--- 0 Alta Wind XI, LLC - Alta Wind XI, LLC Wind 397 0
- - -0 American Kings Solar Project - American Solar 509 0 - - -0 American Solar Greenworks, LLC - SummSolar 15 0
- - - 0 Bishop Creek 2 - Bishop Creek - Unit 3 Eligible Hydroelectric 8 0 - - - 0 Bishop Creek 2 - Bishop Creek 2 Eligible Hydroelectric 8 0 - - - 0 Bishop Creek 2 - Bishop Creek 2 - Unit 2 Eligible Hydroelectric 8 0 --- 0 Bishop Creek 3 - Bishop Creek 3 Eligible Hydroelectric 30 0 --- 0 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 Eligible Hydroelectric 7 0 --- 0 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 - Unit 2 Eligible Hydroelectric 7 0 --- 0 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 - Unit 3 Eligible Hydroelectric 14 0 --- 0 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 - Unit 4 Eligible Hydroelectric 16 0 --- 0 Bishop Creek 4 - Bishop Creek 4 - Unit 5 Eligible Hydroelectric 14 0 --- 0 Bishop Creek 5 - Bishop Creek 5 Eligible Hydroelectric 9 0 --- 0 Bishop Creek 5 - Bishop Creek 5 - Unit 2 Eligible Hydroelectric 11 0 --- 0 Bishop Creek 6 - Bishop Creek 6 Eligible Hydroelectric 16 0 - - -0 Blythe Solar II, LLC - Blythe Solar II, LLC Solar 143 0 - - -0 Blythe Solar II, LLC - Blythe Solar II, LLC Solar 145 0 - - -0 Blythe Solar II, LLC - Blythe Solar II, LLC Solar 138 0 - - -0 Blythe Solar II, LLC - Blythe Solar II, LLC Solar 112 0 Blythe Solar III, LLC - Blythe Solar III, LLSolar 181.909 0 Blythe Solar III, LLC - Blythe Solar III, LLSolar 385.091 0 --- 0 Borden Solar Farm - Borden Solar Farm Solar 177 0 --- 0 Broadview Energy KW, LLC - BEKW Wind 890 0
--- 0 Broadview Energy, JN LLC - BEJN Wind 1124 0
--- 0 California PV Energy at Jurupa - CalifornSolar 4 0 --- 0 Cape Scott Wind - Cape Scott Wind Wind 1551 0
--- 0 Catalina Solar 2, LLC - Catalina Solar 2, Solar 82 0 --- 0 CED Atwell Island West - CED Atwell IslaSolar 72 0 - - - 0 CED Corcoran Solar 2, LLC - CED CorcoSolar 70 0 - - - 0 CED Ducor Solar 1, LLC - CED Ducor SoSolar 54 0 - - - 0 CED Ducor Solar 2, LLC - CED Ducor SoSolar 54 0 - - - 0 CED Ducor Solar 3, LLC - CED Ducor SoSolar 61 0 - - - 0 CED Ducor Solar 4, LLC - CED Ducor SoSolar 80 0 - - - 0 CED Wistaria Solar, LLC - Wistaria Ranc Solar 4 0 --- 0 Central Antelope Dry Ranch C, LLC - CeSolar 50 0
67 --- 0 Chetwynd Biomass - West Fraser - ChetwBiomass & Biogas 4 0.718141 --- 0 Citizen Solar B, LLC - Citizen Solar B Solar 6 0
- - -0 Copper Mountain Solar 4 - Copper MounSolar 328 0 --- 0 Coronal Lost Hills, LLC - Coronal Lost HiSolar 58 0 --- 0 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, BlSolar 117 0 --- 0 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, BlSolar 117 0 --- 0 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, BlSolar 105 0 --- 0 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, BlSolar 117 0 --- 0 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, BlSolar 117 0 --- 0 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, BlSolar 117 0 --- 0 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, BlSolar 77 0 --- 0 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, BlSolar 40 0 --- 0 Desert Stateline LLC - Stateline Solar, BlSolar 105 0 --- 0 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 250Solar 135 0 --- 0 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 250Solar 135 0 --- 0 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 250Solar 91 0 - - - 0 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 250Solar 48 0 - - - 0 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 250Solar 99 0 - - - 0 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 250Solar 87 0 - - - 0 Desert Sunlight 250 - Desert Sunlight 250Solar 265 0 --- 0 DESERT SUNLIGHT 300, LLC - DSL-BL Solar 172 0
--- 0 DG Solar Lessee II, LLC - E Philadelphia Solar 2 0 --- 0 Dokie Wind - Dokie Wind Wind 850 0
--- 0 Duran Mesa LLC - Duran Mesa LLC Wind 6262 0
--- 0 El Cabo Wind - El Cabo Wind Wind 1755 0
--- 0 Fontana - Fontana Eligible Hydroelectric 13 0
--- 0 Freeway Springs, LLC - Freeway SpringsSolar 4 0
--- 0 FTS Master Tenant 1, LLC - A - FTS MasSolar 7 0
--- 0 FTS Master Tenant 1, LLC - B - FTS MasSolar 7 0
--- 0 Garnet Solar Power Generation Station 1Solar 13 0 - - - 0 Golden Solar, LLC - Dulles - Golden SolaSolar 3 0 --- 0 Golden Springs Building F, LLC - Golden Solar 3 0 --- 0 Golden Springs Development Company LSolar 4 0
--- 0 Golden Springs Development Company LSolar 4 0
--- 0 Golden Springs Development Company, Solar 4 0
--- 0 Golden Springs Development Company, Solar 2 0
--- 0 Great Valley Solar 3, LLC - RE TranquillitSolar 85 0 - - - 0 Highlander Solar 1, LLC - Highlander Sol Solar 51 0 - - - 0 Highlander Solar 2, LLC - Highlander Sol Solar 37 0 - - - 0 Imperial Valley Solar 3, LLC - Mount SignSolar 935 0 --- 0 Jacumba Solar, LLC - Jacumba Solar Fa Solar 75 0
- - - 0 Kaweah 2 - Kaweah 2 Eligible Hydroelectric 2 0
- - - 0 Kern River 1 - Kern River 1 Eligible Hydroelectric 283 0 - - - 0 Lancaster Dry Farm Ranch B, LLC - LancSolar 12 0 - - - 0 Lancaster Little Rock C LLC - Lancaster Solar 5 0 - - - 0 Lone Valley Solar Park I, LLC - Lone ValSolar 36 0 --- 0 Lone Valley Solar Park II, LLC - Lone VaSolar 76 0 --- 0 Longboat Solar, LLC - Longboat Solar, LSolar 65 0 --- 0 Lundy - Lundy Eligible Hydroelectric 6 0
--- 0 Lundy - Lundy - Unit 2 Eligible Hydroelectric 6 0 --- 0 Lytle Creek - Lytle Creek Eligible Hydroelectric 3 0 --- 0 Mammoth Pacific L. P. (MP1) - MammothGeothermal 301 0 Manzana - Manzana Wind LLC Wind 960 0 Manzana - Manzana Wind LLC Wind 14872 0 --- 0 Master Development - Corona, CA (1351Solar 2 0
--- 0 Maverick Solar, LLC - Maverick Solar, LLSolar 588 0 --- 0 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SolaSolar 171 0
--- 0 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SolaSolar 85 0
- - - 0 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SolaSolar 78 0 - - - 0 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SolaSolar 128 0 --- 0 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SolaSolar 128 0
--- 0 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SolaSolar 110 0
--- 0 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SolaSolar 171 0
--- 0 McCoy Solar, LLC - Genesis McCoy SolaSolar 149 0
--- 0 Meikle Wind - Meikle Wind Wind 444 0
--- 0 Mesquite Solar 2, LLC - Mesquite Solar 2Solar 433 0 --- 0 Mill Creek 3 - Mill Creek 3 - Unit 3 Eligible Hydroelectric 5 0 --- 0 Mill Creek 3 - Mill Creek 3 - Unit 4 Eligible Hydroelectric 5 0 --- 0 Mill Creek 3 - Mill Creek 3 - Unit 5 Eligible Hydroelectric 5 0 --- 0 Moose Lake Wind - Moose Lake Wind Wind 82 0
--- 0 Mound Solar Partnership XI, LLC - AnteloSolar 7 0 --- 0 Mount Signal Solar Farm II - Mount SignaSolar 635 0 --- 0 Mountain View III - Mountain View PowerWind 20402 0 --- 0 Mustang Hills, LLC - Mustang Hills, LLC Wind 453 0 --- 0 Nicolis, LLC - Nicolis Solar PV Plant Solar 59 0
--- 0 North Lancaster Ranch, LLC - North LancSolar 55 0 - - - 0 North Rosamond Solar, LLC - North RosaSolar 617 0 --- 0 NRG Solar Oasis LLC - Oasis Solar Solar 80 0
--- 0 Oasis Alta - Oasis Alta Wind 10829 0
--- 0 Oltmans SCE at Champagne - CaliforniaSolar 2 0
--- 0 Ontario 1 - Ontario 1 Eligible Hydroelectric 4 0
--- 0 Ontario 2 - Ontario 2 Eligible Hydroelectric 2 0
--- 0 Orion Solar II, LLC - Orion Solar II, LLC Solar 29 0 --- 0 Ormat Dixie Valley, LLC - Ormat Dixie VaGeothermal 460 0 --- 0 Ormat Dixie Valley, LLC - Ormat Dixie VaGeothermal 44 0 --- 0 Panoche Valley Solar - Panoche Valley SSolar 191 0 --- 0 Panoche Valley Solar - Panoche Valley SSolar 135 0 --- 0 Panoche Valley Solar - Phase 2 Solar 107 0
--- 0 Park Meridian 1 - Kona Solar, LLC - ParkSolar 4 0 --- 0 Pennask Wind Farm - Pennask Wind FarWind 57 0
--- 0 Point Wind 2 - Point Wind 2 Wind 8456 0
--- 0 Poole - Poole Eligible Hydroelectric 34 0
68 --- 0 Portal - Portal Eligible Hydroelectric 28 0
--- 0 Portal Ridge Solar B, LLC - Portal Ridge Solar 73 0 --- 0 Porterville - SPVP042 - Porterville - SPVPSolar 11 0 - - - 0 Potrero Hills Energy Producers - Potrero Biomass & Biogas 367 1.0643 --- 0 Pumpjack Solar - Pumpjack Solar Solar 71 0
--- 0 Quality Wind - Quality Wind Wind 1962 0
--- 0 Rancho Cucamonga Distribution Center Solar 5 0
--- 0 RE Adams East, LLC - RE Adams East, Solar 61 0
--- 0 RE Columbia 3 LLC - RE Columbia 3 LLCSolar 36 0
- - - 0 RE Garland A - Garland A Solar 90 0
- - - 0 RE Rio Grande, LLC - RE Rio Grande, LSolar 16 0 - - - 0 RE Rosamond Two LLC - RE RosamondSolar 71 0
RE Tranquillity - RE Tranquillity Solar 779 0 - - - 0
- - - 0 RE Victor Phelan Solar One LLC - RE VicSolar 66 0 - - - 0 Regulus Solar, LLC - Regulus Solar, LLCSolar 229 0 --- 0 Rio Bravo Solar I - Rio Bravo Solar I Solar 81 0
--- 0 Rio Bravo Solar II - Rio Bravo Solar II Solar 79 0 --- 0 Rising Tree Wind Farm III LLC - Rising T Wind 409 0 --- 0 Rising Tree Wind Farm LLC - Rising TreeWind 386 0 --- 0 Rush Creek - Rush Creek Eligible Hydroelectric 29 0 --- 0 Rush Creek - Rush Creek - Unit 2 Eligible Hydroelectric 35 0 --- 0 SE Athos I - SE Athos I, LLC Solar 10500 0
--- 0 SEPV Mojave West, LLC - SEPV MojaveSolar 84 0
- - - 0 SEPV Palmdale East, LLC - SEPV PalmdSolar 39 0
- - - 0 Shiloh Wind Project 2, LLC - Shiloh WindWind 10247 0 --- 0 Shinish Creek Wind Farm - Shinish CreeWind 50 0
--- 0 Sierra - Sierra Eligible Hydroelectric 4 0
--- 0 Sierra Pacific Burney Facility - Sierra PacBiomass & Biogas 244 2.2448 --- 0 Sierra Pacific Ind. (Lincoln) - Sierra Pacif Biomass & Biogas 235 2.6555 --- 0 Sierra Pacific Ind. (Quincy) - Sierra PacifBiomass & Biogas 586 29.2414 --- 0 Sierra Pacific Sonora - Sierra Pacific SonBiomass & Biogas 80 6.272 --- 0 Sierra Solar Greenworks - Sierra Solar GSolar 59 0 - - - 0 Silver State Solar Power South, Block 2 aSolar 250 0 --- 0 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - Sil Solar 101 0 --- 0 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - Sil Solar 137 0 --- 0 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - Sil Solar 135 0 --- 0 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - Sil Solar 107 0 --- 0 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - Sil Solar 227 0 --- 0 Silver State Solar Power South, LLC - Sil Solar 4 0 --- 0 Solar Partners I, LLC - Ivanpah 2 Solar 396 35.4024 --- 0 Solar Star California XIII, LLC - Quinto SoSolar 393 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SoSolar 228 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SoSolar 228 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SoSolar 247 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SoSolar 105 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SoSolar 160 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SoSolar 63 0 - - - 0 Solar Star California XIX, LLC - AVS1 SoSolar 276 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SoSolar 240 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SoSolar 221 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SoSolar 191 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SoSolar 162 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SoSolar 151 0 --- 0 Solar Star California XX, LLC - AVS 2 SoSolar 135 0 --- 0 SPI Anderson 2 - SPI Anderson 2 Biomass & Biogas 247 2.5935 --- 0 Stockton Biomass - Stockton Biomass Biomass & Biogas 1884 54.2592 --- 0 Sun Streams, LLC - Sun Streams, LLC Solar 659 0
--- 0 SunE Solar XV Lessor, LLC - Hesperia Solar 5 0
--- 0 SunE Solar XVI Lessor, LLC - SunE - PicSolar 3 0
--- 0 SunE Solar XVI Lessor, LLC - SunE - Ro Solar 1 0
--- 0 Sunray Energy 3, LLC - Sunray Energy 3Solar 58 0
- - - 0 Sunshine Valley Solar - Sunshine Valley Solar 411 0 --- 0 TA-High Desert - Antelope Power Plant Solar 84 0
--- 0 Terra Francesco 1 - Kona Solar, LLC - TeSolar 3 0 --- 0 Tropico, LLC - Tropico Solar PV Plant Solar 41 0
--- 0 Tule Wind, LLC - Tule Wind, LLC Wind 497 0
--- 0 Valentine Solar, LLC - Valentine Solar, LSolar 453 0 --- 0 Vega Solar, LLC - Vega Solar, LLC Solar 79 0
--- 0 Victor Dry Farm Ranch A LLC - Victor Dr Solar 15 0 - - - 0 Victor Dry Farm Ranch B LLC - Victor Dr Solar 15 0 - - - 0 Voyager Wind I - Voyager Wind I Wind 616 0
- - - 0 Wildwood Solar - Wildwood Solar Solar 64 0
- - - 0 Wildwood Solar II - Wildwood Solar II Solar 60 0 - - - 0 Willow Springs 2 - Willow Springs 2 Solar 371 0 - - - 0 Windstar - Windstar1 Wind 181 0
- - - 0 Windstar - Windstar2 Wind 208 0
- - - 0 Big Creek 3 Large Hydroelectric 5087.694921 0
- - - 0 - - - 0
- - - 0 GCPD - Priest Rapids & Wanapum Large Hydroelectric 965 0 69 - 1,813 - - - - - -
RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS RETIRED UNBUNDLED RECS Facility Name Fuel Type
State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)Facility Name Fuel Type State or
Province RPS ID Total Retired (in MWh)
South Hurlburt Wind, LLC Wind OR 61668A 915
Horseshoe Bend Wind, LLC Wind OR 61669A 898
Electricity Portfolio #5 Name Electricity Portfolio #6 Name Electricity Portfolio #7 Name Electricity Portfolio #8 Name Total Retired Unbundled RECs Total Retired Unbundled RECs Total Retired Unbundled RECs Total Retired Unbundled RECs Electricity Portfolio #4 Name
Total Retired Unbundled RECs
Base Choice
Total Retired Unbundled RECsTotal Retired Unbundled RECs Premium Renewable Choice Electricity Portfolio #3 Name
Total Retired Unbundled RECs
70 2024 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT
ATTESTATION FORM
For the Year Ending December 31, 2024
Rancho Mirage Energy Authority
I, Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager, declare under penalty of perjury, that the information provided in this report is true and correct and that I, as an authorized agent of Rancho Mirage Energy Authority, have authority to submit this report on the retail supplier's behalf.
I further declare that all of the electricity claimed as specified purchases as shown in this report was sold once and only once to retail customers.
Name: Isaiah Hagerman
Representing(Retail Supplier):Rancho Mirage Energy Authority Signature:
Dated:7/18/2025
Executed at: RanchoMirage, CA
71 City Council Staff Report
Authorization for the City Manager to Procure Six (6) Level III DC Fast Charging Units
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5G.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Jessica Pulliam, Deputy of Sustainability
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to procure six (6) Level III DC Fast Charging Units at a not-to-exceed cost of $50,000 per unit, and to take all necessary actions to secure Southern California Edison (SCE) Charge Ready funding, implement required utility upgrades, and complete installation at City facilities.
DISCUSSION
The State of California has made clear that electrification is a certainty. Under the California Air Resources Board’s Advanced Clean Fleets Rule (ACF), public agencies are already required to ensure that, as of 2024, at least 50% of new vehicles purchases are zero-emission. By 2027, 100% of new carpool purchases must be zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs).
Recognizing this requirement and the rapid transition underway statewide, the City Council on July 17, 2025, authorized the transition of the City fleet to electric vehicles. This forward-thinking action demonstrated the Council’s leadership in replacing outdated combustion service vehicles with modern, sustainable alternatives.
To support both fleet operations and community demand, staff identified the Rancho Mirage Library and Rancho Mirage Community Park as priority sites for fast charging infrastructure.
In July, the City received preauthorization under SCE’s Charge Ready DCFC Program for approximately $10,050 per port rebate (about $60,000 in total for six ports). While the rebate covers only a portion of the equipment cost, SCE also assumes responsibility for designing and installing the Utility-Side Infrastructure at no cost to the City, including all conduit and service upgrades necessary to bring sufficient power to the meter.
This utility-side investment is significant, without SCE’s participation and the reserved grant funding, the City could face long delays in securing adequate power allocation at these sites in the future, as well as substantial cost exposure. By acting now, the City leverages both state utility resources and available rebates to offset upfront costs.
In addition to SCE’s rebate, staff is also exploring potential eligibility for the federal “direct pay” tax credit mechanism (established under the Inflation Reduction Act). If confirmed, this incentive would allow the City to claim the equivalent of a tax credit as a direct payment, further reducing the City’s net cost of charger procurement.
72 Staff therefore proposes procurement of six (6) DC Fast Charging Units (ChargePoint Express 280 or equivalent) for installation at the Rancho Mirage Library and Rancho Mirage Community Park.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact is not to exceed the approved budget.
73 City Council Staff Report
Amended Recognized Obligations Payment Schedule (ROPS) for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5H.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Kofi Antobam, Director of Administrative Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 2025-SA-(Next-in-Order), Approving and Adopting an Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for January 1, 2026, through June 30, 2026, Pursuant to Assembly Bills 26x1 and 1484.
DISCUSSION
On December 19, 2024, the Successor Agency adopted Resolution No. 2024-SA-02 approving the ROPS for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (“ROPS 25-26”) and the proposed administrative budget. The Riverside Countywide Oversight Board (COB), pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(l), adopted Resolution 2025-017 approving ROPS 25- 26 on January 19, 2025, and directed staff to submit the ROPS to the California Department of Finance (DOF).
The DOF issued a determination letter dated February 28, 2025, approving ROPS 25-26. Recently, staff discovered that the debt service payment due for the 2003 A-1 Subordinate Lien Tax Allocation Bonds was missing from the approved ROPS 25-26. This error resulted in total debt service being short by the A-1 Subordinate Lien Tax Allocation Bond debt service amount. In accordance with Section 34177 of the Health and Safety Code, staff has prepared an Amended ROPS 25-26B to request funding for the shortfall in debt service due to the error. The amended ROPS must be submitted to the DOF by October 1, 2025, to be considered.
Upon approval, the Amended ROPS 25-26B will be submitted to the COB for approval, and subsequently to the DOF. The DOF will issue a determination at least 15 days before the date of the property tax distribution for the January 1 through June 30 ROPS period.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Draft Resolution
74 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-SA-____
AN AMENDED AND RESTATED RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO MIRAGE ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER
RANCHO MIRAGE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN AMEMDED RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR JANUARY 1, 2026 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026 PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILLS 26x1 AND 1484 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Mirage (“City”) agreed to serve as the successor agency to the Rancho Mirage Redevelopment Agency (the “RDA”) commencing upon the dissolution of the RDA on February 1, 2012 pursuant to Assembly Bill x1 26 (“AB 26”); and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2012 as part of the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 State budget bill, the Governor signed into law Assembly Bill 1484 (“AB 1484”) which modified some of the provisions of AB 26, including Health & Safety Code Section 34177(m) which requires that the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”) for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 be approved and submitted by the former RDA successor agency (“Successor Agency”) and its oversight board (“Oversight Board”) to the County Auditor-Controller and Department of Finance (“DOF”) by February 1, 2025.
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2024, the Successor Agency adopted Resolution No. 2024-SA-02 approving the ROPS for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 (“ROPS 25-26”) and the proposed administrative budget pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(l); and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2025, the Riverside County-wide Oversight Board adopted Resolution No. 2025-017 approving the ROPS 25-26 and the proposed administrative budget pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(l); and WHEREAS, now, the Successor Agency seeks to adopt an amended and restated resolution approving an amended ROPS 2025-26, in substantially the same form as that attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (“Amended ROPS 25-26B”), due to an omission in the originally approved ROPS 25-26, which resulted in debt service being short by the 2003 A-1 Subordinate Lien Tax Bond debt service amount described in ROPS 25-26.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER RANCHO MIRAGE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals.
That the Recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
ATTACHMENT 1
75 Section 2. Approval of Amended ROPS 25-26B.
That the City, acting as the Successor Agency, hereby approve and adopt the Amended ROPS 25-26B, which shall be submitted to the DOF on the preferred forms provided by the DOF.
Section 3. Director of Administrative Services Acting for Successor Agency.
That the City’s Director of Administrative Services acting for the Successor Agency is hereby authorized to submit the Amended ROPS 25-26B to the County Oversight Board for approval, and that staff is directed to post a copy of the Amended ROPS 25- 26B on the City’s (as Successor Agency) website and take whatever additional actions necessary pursuant to AB 26 and AB 1484.
Section 4. City Clerk Acting for Successor Agency.
That the City Clerk acting for the Successor Agency shall certify to the passage of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions and take any other actions and/or perform any other duties required by law.
Section 5. Severability.
That should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 6. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions.
That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City Council, acting on behalf of the Successor Agency, that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.
Section 7. Certification.
That the City Clerk acting for the Successor Agency shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
Section 8. Effective Date.
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 76 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2025.
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE ACTING
AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
FORMER RANCHO MIRAGE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
________________________________
Ted Weill, Mayor acting for Successor
Agency
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk acting
for Successor Agency
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Colin D. Kirkpatrick, City Attorney acting for
Successor Agency
77 EXHIBIT “A”
AMENDED RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE
FOR JANAURY 1, 2026 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026
(SEE ATTACHED)
78 Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26B) - Summary Filed for the January 1, 2026 through June 30, 2026 Period Successor Agency: Rancho Mirage
County: Riverside
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
ROPS 25-26B
Authorized
Amounts
ROPS 25-26B
Requested
Adjustments
ROPS 25-26B
Amended
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ -$-$- B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 2,940,191 $ 3,340,000 $ 6,280,191 F RPTTF 2,815,191 3,340,000 6,155,191
G Administrative RPTTF 125,000 -125,000
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 2,940,191 $ 3,340,000 $ 6,280,191 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:
Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date
79 Rancho Mirage
Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26B) - ROPS Detail January 1, 2026 through June 30, 2026
Item
# Project Name Obligation
Type
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Authorized Amounts
Total
Requested Adjustments
Total Notes Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
$46,761,695 $- $- $- $2,815,191 $125,000 $2,940,191 $- $- $- $3,340,000 $- $3,340,000 1 Tax Allocation Bond Servicing Fees $55,000 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 2 Tax Allocation Bond Payments - Interest Bonds
Issued On
or Before
12/31/10
$6,269,255 - - - 675,929 - $675,929 - - - 2,265,622 - $2,265,622 Omitted interest payment for Rancho Mirage RDA Whitewater
Redevelopment Project
Subordinate Lien Tax Allocation
Bond, Series 2003A-1 (CAB).
3 Tax Allocation Bond Payments - Principal Bonds
Issued On
or Before
12/31/10
$33,185,000 - - - 1,702,500 - $1,702,500 - - - 1,074,378 - $1,074,378 Omitted principal payment for Rancho Mirage RDA Whitewater
Redevelopment Project
Subordinate Lien Tax Allocation
Bond, Series 2003A-1 (CAB).
4 Reserve for next year's debt service to
comply with bond covenants that the
entire year's debt service must be on hand
prior to spending tax increment on any
other obligations.
Reserves $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
8 Administrative Cost Reimbursement Admin
Costs
$250,000 - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
21 Housing Tax Allocation Bonds- Interest Bonds
Issued On
or Before
12/31/10
$1,317,440 - - - 134,262 - $134,262 - - - - - $-
22 Housing Tax Allocation Bonds- Principal Bonds
Issued On
or Before
12/31/10
$5,685,000 - - - 302,500 - $302,500 - - - - - $-
23 Reserve for next year's debt service to
comply with bond covenants that the
entire year's debt service must be on hand
prior to spending tax increment on any
other obligations.
Reserves $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
80 City Council Staff Report
Updated Calendar Year 2025 Salary Schedule
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5I.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Joseph Carpenter, Assistant Director of Administrative Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Resolution No. 2025-(Next-in-Order), Approving the Updated Calendar Year 2025 Salary Schedule to Comply with California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS) Statutory and Regulatory Requirements for Compensation Earnable and Publicly Available Pay Schedules.
DISCUSSION
On January 8, 2020, CalPERS issued Circular Letter 200-003-20, clarifying that salary schedules must comply with Government Code Section 20636 and CCR Section 570.5. The City must comply with the compensation earnable provisions and corresponding regulations of the Public Employee’s Retirement Law. Where employers fail to comply, CalPERS will be unable to use such pay amounts when calculating members’ retirement benefits.
To comply with said codes, salary schedules need to meet the following requirements:
1. Have been duly approved and adopted by the employer’s governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws;
2. Identifies the position title for every employee position;
3. Shows the payrate for each identified position, which may be stated as a single amount or as multiple amounts within a range;
4. Indicates the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually;
5. Is posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer’s internet website;
6. Indicates an effective date and date of any revisions;
7. Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years; and
8. Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the payrate.
All eight (8) requirements must be met for CalPERS to approve the pay amount as payrate and reportable compensation earnable.
Annually the City Council approves and adopts a salary schedule that complies with all applicable government codes. The current salary schedule was approved and adopted on June 18, 2025, via Resolution 2025-28. 81 There are, at times, changes made to the salary schedule throughout the year that require the City Council to approve and adopt an updated schedule. These changes can include, but are not limited to, administrative changes for simplicity, addition of positions, removal of positions, change in salary of contracted employees, and changes in salary negotiated between the City Council and Rancho Mirage Employee Association. Changes reflected in this salary schedule update are:
REVISIONS TO EXISTING POSITIONS
City Clerk – Updated salary in accordance with contract amendment The salary schedule included as Exhibit A to the Resolution will be in effect from September 4, 2025, until amended by the City Council.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Draft Resolution
82 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-_____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE APPROVING THE UPDATED CALENDAR YEAR 2025 SALARY SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE’S RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS) STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
COMPENSATION EARNABLE AND PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULES
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Mirage (“City”) is a charter city and recognized as a political subdivision of the State of California for certain purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City must comply with the compensation earnable and publicly available pay schedules provisions contained within California Government Code (CGC) section 20636(d) and California Code of Regulations (CCR) 570.5 otherwise CalPERS is unable to use any such amounts when calculating members’ retirement benefits; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Division of the Department of Administrative Services who manages the salary schedules requests that the City Council approve certain additions, deletions, and modifications to the salary schedule; and
WHEREAS, attached to this resolution and incorporated by reference is the City’s updated comprehensive salary schedule which will be made publicly available on the City’s external website and provided upon request; and
WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the City Council desires to adopt the updated Calendar Year 2025 salary schedule, subject to any modifications made by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals.
That the Recitals set forth above are true and correct.
Section 2. Approval and Adoption of the City’s Calendar Year 2025 Salary Schedule.
That the City Council hereby approves and confirms the salary schedule to comply with California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) statuary and regulatory requirements for compensation earnable and publicly available pay schedules.
Section 3. Severability.
That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court ATTACHMENT 1
83 action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 4. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions.
That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City or the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.
Section 5. Effective Date.
That this Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
Section 6. Certification.
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
84 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 4th day of September, 2025.
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
____________________________
Ted Weill, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Colin Kirkpatrick, City Attorney
85 EXHIBIT “A”
SALARY SCHEDULE
(SEE ATTACHED)
86 RANGE TITLE *A B C D E F G
20 Library Page 1 20.1484 21.1557 22.2135 22.7687 23.3381 23.9216 24.5195 21 Library Clerk I 1 21.1557 22.2135 23.3242 23.9073 24.5051 25.1175 25.7457 22 1 22.2135 23.3242 24.4904 25.1025 25.7302 26.3735 27.0329 23 Records Technician I 1 23.3242 24.4904 25.7149 26.3578 27.0167 27.6921 28.3844 1 24.4904 25.7149 27.0006 27.6759 28.3676 29.0769 29.8037 2 - - - - - -32.5274
25 Maintenance Worker I 1 25.7149 27.0006 28.3507 29.0593 29.7860 30.5306 31.2939 26 Audio Visual Assistant
Library Assistant 1 27.0006 28.3507 29.7683 30.5126 31.2753 32.0571 32.8586 27 Accounting Technician II
Code Compliance Officer I
Library Clerk II
Maintenance Worker II
Observatory Assistant
1 28.3507 29.7683 31.2567 32.0381 32.8391 33.6602 34.5018 28 Administrative Analyst
Animal Control/Code Compliance Officer I
Permit Technician
Planning Technician
Public Works Technician
1 29.7683 31.2567 32.8196 33.6401 34.4810 35.3429 36.2266 1 31.2567 32.8196 34.4606 35.3222 36.2052 37.1104 38.0381 2 - - - - - -39.0368
30 Building Inspector I
Code Compliance Officer II
Coordinator I
Development Services Technician
Mobile Home/Code Inspector
Traffic Signal Technician I
1 32.8196 34.4606 36.1837 37.0883 38.0154 38.9658 39.9401 31 1 34.4606 36.1837 37.9929 38.9426 39.9161 40.9142 41.9370 1 36.1837 37.9929 39.8924 40.8899 41.9121 42.9599 44.0338 2 - - - - - -48.0579
33 Housing Specialist
Public Works Inspector
Records Management Coordinator
1 37.9929 39.8924 41.8872 42.9342 44.0077 45.1077 46.2354 34 IT Business Analyst I
Marketing & Events Specialist
Program Coordinator
Senior Building Inspector
Senior Code Compliance Officer
Senior Coordinator
Senior Librarian
Senior Traffic Signal Technician
1 39.8924 41.8872 43.9814 45.0810 46.2079 47.3633 48.5472 35 Human Resource Specialist (Confidential)
Media & Communications Specialist
Multimedia Specialist
1 41.8872 43.9814 46.1806 47.3348 48.5184 49.7313 50.9745 32 Accountant
Assistant Planner
Building Inspector II
Building/Landscaping Maintenance Supervisor
Circulation Supervisor
Coordinator II
Engineering Technician II
GIS Specialist
Librarian/Technology Librarian
Network & Computer Specialist
Network & Support Specialist
Traffic Signal Technician II
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE - HOURLY SALARY SCHEDULE
24 Office Assistant III
29 Computer & Audio/Visual Technician
Digital Marketing Coordinator
Senior Accounting Technician
Senior Maintenance Worker
* 1 - Hired on or after 01/01/2012
* 2 - Hired on or before 12/31/2011 (payrate is the max for individual employees within each specific range)87
RANGE TITLE *A B C D E F G
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE - HOURLY SALARY SCHEDULE
36 Accounting Supervisor
Assistant to the City Manager
Associate Planner
Building/Landscaping Maintenance Supervisor II
Contracts Specialist
Financial Analyst
IT Business Analyst II
Management Analyst
Principal Librarian
Project Manager
Records Management Supervisor
Streets Maintenance Supervisor
1 43.9814 46.1806 48.4896 49.7019 50.9443 52.2180 53.5234 37 1 46.1806 48.4896 50.9141 52.1869 53.4916 54.8287 56.1997 38 Astronomer
Executive Coordinator (Confidential)
Senior Management Analyst
Senior Planner
1 48.4896 50.9141 53.4599 54.7962 56.1661 57.5703 59.0094 39 Associate Civil Engineer 1 50.9141 53.4599 56.1327 57.5359 58.9746 60.4489 61.9599 40 1 53.4599 56.1327 58.9393 60.4130 61.9232 63.4712 65.0580 41 Code Compliance Manager
Facilities & Fleet Manager
Finance Manager
Housing Manager
Human Resources Manager (Confidential)
Information Services Manager
Library Operations Manager
Planning Manager
Records Manager
Senior Civil Engineer
Streets & Fleet Manager
1 56.1327 58.9393 61.8864 63.4334 65.0193 66.6447 68.3108 42 1 58.9393 61.8864 64.9809 66.6052 68.2701 69.9769 71.7265 43 Senior Manager 1 61.8864 64.9809 68.2298 69.9353 71.6838 73.4760 75.3129 44 1 64.9809 68.2298 71.6411 73.4321 75.2679 77.1496 79.0786 45 1 68.2298 71.6411 75.2232 77.1037 79.0313 81.0072 83.0324 46 1 71.6411 75.2232 78.9843 80.9591 82.9830 85.0574 87.1839 47 1 75.2232 78.9843 82.9337 85.0069 87.1321 89.3104 91.5431 48 1 78.9843 82.9337 87.0803 89.2573 91.4887 93.7759 96.1204 Contract Emergency Manager 4 58.3164 61.2321 64.2938 65.9010 67.5485 69.2373 70.9684 Contract Assistant Director / Building Official / Deputy 4 74.0000 77.7000 79.6425 81.6336 83.6744 85.7663 87.9104 Contract City Engineer 4 74.0000 77.7000 79.6425 81.6336 83.6744 85.7663 87.9104 Contract Director 4 92.2500 96.8625 99.2841 101.7662 104.3103 106.9181 109.5910 Contract Library Director and Executive Director of RMWF 101.8654 106.4779 108.8994 111.3815 113.9257 116.5335 119.2064 Contract City Clerk - - - - - -71.3942
Contract Assistant City Manager 1 - - - - - -130.0000
Contract City Manager - - - - - -171.6347
Elected Councilmember 4 - - - - - -17.9375
Elected Mayor 4 - - - - - -19.7312
Effective September 4, 2025 | Updated August 28, 2025
* 1 - Hired on or after 01/01/2012
* 2 - Hired on or before 12/31/2011 (payrate is the max for individual employees within each specific range)88
City Council Staff Report
Quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2025
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5J.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Joseph Carpenter, Assistant Director of Administrative Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive and File the June 30, 2025, Quarterly Treasurer’s Report.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the Quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ending June 30, 2025. This report is submitted to City Council for the purpose of providing detailed information over all monies overseen by the City Treasurer.
A provision of the Statement of Investment Policy readopted February 20, 2025 via Resolution 2025-01 pertains to investment reporting to City Council on a quarterly basis (Section VIII). It is the City's policy to achieve a market rate of return on public funds while minimizing risks and preserving capital. City Investments are analyzed on a Total Return basis. Total Return takes into account interest income, realized gains and losses, and unrealized gains and losses due to change in market value during the period measured. When portfolios have unrealized losses, total returns will be lower.
The City’s Total Return is compared to the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index, the table below summarizes the comparison.
It should be noted, on an accrual basis the city had $1,070,636.98 in quarterly earnings – see Page 5 of this staff report for details.
89 Definitions:
Total Return: Total return takes into account interest income, realized gains and losses, and unrealized gains and losses due to change in market value during the period measured.
Duration: Duration is the percentage change in the price of a security for a 1% change in the security's yield.
Yield: Yield to maturity is a forward-looking earnings indicator that assumes all coupons will be reinvested at the security's yield.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Quarterly Treasurer's Report
Attachment 2 - 45 Day Reporting Requirement
90 Sector
Average
Maturity Par Amount
Original
Cost Adjusted Cost Market Value Coupon
Yield to
Maturity
Checking Account 1 Day 1,721,833.25 1,721,833.25 1,721,833.25 1,721,833.25 0.00%0.00% First American Treasury Fund 1 Day 25,121.86 25,121.86 25,121.86 25,121.86 4.36%4.36% CAMP 1 Day 11,467,704.28 11,467,704.28 11,467,704.28 11,467,704.28 4.40%4.40% LAIF - City 1 Day 408,496.11 408,496.11 408,496.11 408,496.11 4.40%4.40% U.S. Treasuries 2.37 Years 46,110,000.00 44,782,543.59 45,193,642.85 45,071,119.65 2.39%3.27% Federal Agencies 1.62 Years 680,000.00 609,014.80 654,487.63 647,848.92 0.83%3.36% Corporate Notes 2.85 Years 19,785,000.00 19,716,710.60 19,727,200.34 19,964,738.21 0.00%4.58% Municipal Bonds 2.43 Years 605,000.00 605,000.00 605,000.00 612,502.24 4.56%4.56% Bank Notes 2.73 Years 1,250,000.00 1,241,743.75 1,244,124.62 1,267,970.00 5.23%5.43% ACMBS 3.00 Years 19,642,758.00 19,212,037.55 19,363,511.90 19,679,419.03 0.00%4.74% City Operating Total 2.44 Years 101,695,913.50 99,790,205.79 100,411,122.84 100,866,753.55 3.93% First American Treasury Fund 1 Day 60,076.04 60,076.04 60,076.04 60,076.04 3.80%3.80% LAIF - Successor Agency 1 Day 3,068,298.27 3,068,298.27 3,068,298.27 3,068,298.27 4.40%4.40% U.S. Treasuries 2.75 Years 1,585,000.00 1,443,261.92 1,467,762.50 1,483,894.44 0.00%4.12% Federal Agencies 0.23 Years 420,000.00 418,903.80 419,950.01 416,173.38 0.00%0.43% Successor Agency Total 304 Days 5,133,374.31 4,990,540.03 5,016,086.82 5,028,442.13 3.98% First American Treasury Fund 1 Days 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 3.80% U.S. Treasuries 0.00 Years - - - - 0.00%
Federal Agencies 0.00 Years - - - - 0.00%
Assessment District Total 0.00 Years 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 3.80% Portfolio Total 2.00 108,107,044.73 106,058,502.74 106,704,966.58 107,172,952.60 3.93% 1 Day 777,154.23 777,154.23 777,154.23 777,154.23 0.00%0.00%Rancho Mirage Energy Authority Lockbox Rancho Mirage Energy Authority River ICS Sweep 1 1 Day 17,339,340.48 17,339,340.48 17,339,340.48 17,339,340.48 Rancho Mirage Energy Authority Total 1 Day 18,116,494.71 18,116,494.71 18,116,494.71 18,116,494.71 4.10% Grand Total 2.34 Years 126,223,539.44 124,174,997.45 124,821,461.29 125,289,447.31 3.36% 1 - RMEA River ICS Sweep annual percentage yield is 4.15%.
Market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of the month as supplied by Interactive Data, Bloomberg Financial LP or Telerate. Where prices are not available from generally recognized sources the securities are priced using a yield-based matrix system to arrive at an estimated market value. Prices that fall between data points are interpolated.
PFMAM’s market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of the month as supplied by Interactive Data, Bloomberg Financial LP or Telerate. Where prices are not available from generally recognized sources the securities are priced using a yield-based matrix system to arrive at an estimated market value. Prices that fall between data points are interpolated.
Rancho Mirage Energy Authority
Successor Agency
City Assessment District Bond Funds
City of Rancho Mirage
Investment Summary
as of June 30, 2025
City Operating Funds
ATTACHMENT 1
91 Account Number Cash Accounts Balance Yield
98-33-707 LAIF-City Operating 408,496.11 4.40% 65-33-014 LAIF-Successor Agency 3,068,298.27 4.40% 6083-001 CAMP 11,467,704.28 4.40%
1496350896 Checking Account - Bank of America 1,721,833.25 0.00% 73330100 GENERAL FUND BUILDING PUR Cash Balance 25,121.86 4.36% Cash Subtotal 16,691,453.77 3.95%
Successor Agency Accounts Balance Yield
206520000 2013A TAX ALL. HOUSING REFUNDING BONDS 183.89 3.81% 206520001 2013A TAX ALL. HOUSING REFUNDING BONDS 762.40 3.81%
WHITEWATER
73330104 2013 WHITEWATER RESERVE
NORTHSIDE
206541000 2013A NORTHSIDE RESERVE 152.28 3.81%
206541001 2013A NORTHSIDE RESERVE 723.00 3.81%
206541002 2013A NORTHSIDE RESERVE 41,797.77 3.81%
231643000 2016A TAX ALL. BONDS 458.95 3.79%
231643001 2016A TAX ALL. BONDS 2,235.12 3.79%
231643003 2016A TAX ALL. EXPENSE ACCOUNT 12,525.84 3.79% 256951000 2017A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 791.77 3.81%
256951001 2017A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 87.22 3.81%
1984 PROJECT (SERIES 2003 A-1, 2003 A-E, & 2003 A-T)
744304004 TAXABLE A-T INTEREST 82.06 3.81%
744304005 TAXABLE A-T PRINCIPAL 248.12 3.81%
744305004 2003 SERIES B CAPITAL PROJ REDEVELOPMENT 27.62 3.81% Successor Agency Subtotal 60,076.04 3.80%
Assessment District Accounts Balance Yield
94420340 (MAGNESIA FALL COVE/WHITE SUN LTD OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT S RIES 2000A INTEREST)2,178.52 3.81% 94420341 (MAGNESIA FALL COVE/WHITE SUN LTD OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT SERIES 2000A PRINCIPAL 102,244.40 3.81% 94420342 (MAGNESIA FALL COVE/WHITE SUN LTD OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT SERIES 2000A RESERVE 179,704.00 3.81% 94420344 (MAGNESIA FALL COVE/WHITE SUN LTD OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT SERIES 2000A PREPAYMENT 0.02 3.81% 94433290 (FRANK SINATRA DRIVE EXT) REF BONDS SERIES 2002 INTEREST 61.95 3.81% 94433291 (FRANK SINATRA DRIVE EXT) REF BONDS SERIES 2002 PRINCIPAL 2,605.16 3.81% 94433292 (FRANK SINATRA DRIVE EXT) REF BONDS SERIES 2002 RESERVE 644,578.90 3.81% 216986000 CFD NO. 4B (DEL WEBB) RESERVE FUND SPECIAL TAX BONDS SERIES 2021 SPECIAL TAX FUND 163.07 3.79% 216986003 CFD NO. 4B (DEL WEBB) RESERVE FUND SPECIAL TAX BONDS SERIES 2021 RESERVE FUND 346,220.90 3.79% Assessment District Subtotal 1,277,756.92 3.80%
Fixed Income & Equities Market Value Yield to Maturity
U.S. Treasuries
Operating Portfolio 45,071,119.65 3.27%
Successor Portfolio 1,483,894.44 4.12%
Federal Agencies
Operating Portfolio 647,848.92 3.36%
Successor Portfolio 416,173.38 0.43%
Corporate Notes
Operating Portfolio 19,964,738.21 4.58%
Municipal Bonds
Operating Portfolio 612,502.24 4.56%
Bank Notes
Operating Portfolio 1,267,970.00 5.43%
ACMBS
Operating Portfolio 19,679,419.03 4.74%
Fixed Income & Equities Subtotal 89,143,665.87 3.93% Portfolio Total 107,172,952.60 3.93%
6714249459 Rancho Mirage Energy Authority Lockbox 777,154.23 0.00% 4920690637 Rancho Mirage Energy Authority ICS Cash Sweep 17,339,340.48 4.15% Rancho Mirage Energy Authority Total 18,116,494.71 4.10% Grand Total 125,289,447.31 3.36%
City of Rancho Mirage
Quarterly Accounts & Ending Balances
as of June 30, 2025
92 Earnings Summary (Accrual Basis)
Ending Amortized Value of Securities 86,787,967.34
Ending Accrued Interest 583,020.54
Plus Proceeds from Sales 13,727,492.60
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments 1,094,482.84 Plus Coupons Received 601,300.34
Less Cost of New Purchases (15,587,408.15)
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities (85,828,439.87) Less Beginning Accrued Interest (508,631.39)
Portfolio Subtotal $869,784.25
CAMP Subtotal $80,873.86
LAIF Subtotal $46,825.46
Successor Agency Subtotal $15,762.80
Portfolio Total $1,013,246.37
ICS Sweep Subtotal $57,390.61
Grand Total $1,070,636.98
City Operating Funds Investment Maturity Distribution
City of Rancho Mirage
Quarterly Earnings and Investment Maturity Distribution as of June 30, 2025
PFMAM-Managed Portfolio
CAMP
ICS Sweep
Successor Agency
LAIF
27%
6%
14%
23%
16%
14%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Overnight Under 1 Year 1 to 2 Years 2 to 3 Years 3 to 4 Years 4 to 5 Years 93 Issuer
S&P
Rating Coupon Maturity Purchased
Days to
Maturity
Par
Amount
Original
Cost
Adjusted
Cost
Market
Value
Yield to
Maturity
Cash Equivalents
Checking Account - Bank of America NR 0.00%7/1/25 6/30/25 1 1,721,833.25 1,721,833.25 1,721,833.25 1,721,833.25 0.00% First American Treasury Oblig. Fund NR 4.36%7/1/25 6/30/25 1 25,121.86 25,121.86 25,121.86 25,121.86 4.36% California Asset Management Program NR 4.40%7/1/25 6/30/25 1 11,467,704.28 11,467,704.28 11,467,704.28 11,467,704.28 4.40% Local Agency Investment Fund - City NR 4.40%7/1/25 6/30/25 1 408,496.11 408,496.11 408,496.11 408,496.11 4.40% Cash Equivalents Subtotal 1 13,623,155.50 13,623,155.50 13,623,155.50 13,623,155.50 3.84% Municipal Bonds
Wells Fargo Bank NA Corporate AA-4.76%11/1/2026 8/9/2023 489 195,000.00 195,000.00 195,000.00 196,833.98 4.75% State of Connecticut AA-4.51%5/15/2028 6/22/2023 1,050 205,000.00 205,000.00 205,000.00 208,001.41 4.51% Los Angeles Unif SD-B NR 4.42%7/1/2028 5/13/2025 1,097 205,000.00 205,000.00 205,000.00 207,666.85 4.42% Municipal Bonds Subtotal 886 605,000.00 605,000.00 605,000.00 612,502.24 4.56% U.S. Treasuries
U.S. Treasury AA+1.63%2/15/2026 3/3/2021 230 1,325,000.00 1,385,401.37 1,332,641.94 1,304,180.28 0.69% U.S. Treasury AA+0.75%4/30/2026 11/3/2021 304 2,500,000.00 2,463,183.59 2,493,193.79 2,432,227.50 1.09% U.S. Treasury AA+0.75%5/31/2026 6/4/2021 335 1,875,000.00 1,871,044.92 1,874,274.97 1,819,830.00 0.79% U.S. Treasury AA+2.25%8/15/2027 1/6/2023 776 2,000,000.00 1,855,000.00 1,933,189.66 1,939,766.00 3.99% U.S. Treasury AA+2.25%11/15/2027 12/5/2024 868 675,000.00 640,168.95 646,623.01 652,640.63 4.13% U.S. Treasury AA+2.75%2/15/2028 9/3/2024 960 2,900,000.00 2,806,882.81 2,828,082.41 2,830,333.30 3.75% U.S. Treasury AA+2.38%5/15/2027 7/6/2022 684 2,000,000.00 1,951,796.88 1,981,441.53 1,950,312.00 2.91% U.S. Treasury AA+1.50%2/15/2030 4/3/2025 1,691 770,000.00 688,819.14 692,564.59 696,699.85 3.90% U.S. Treasury AA+0.50%5/31/2027 4/4/2024 700 1,175,000.00 1,038,130.86 1,091,951.80 1,105,188.55 4.50% U.S. Treasury AA+0.50%8/31/2027 8/2/2024 792 800,000.00 718,718.75 741,804.68 746,750.40 4.04% U.S. Treasury AA+0.50%8/31/2027 10/29/2024 792 1,600,000.00 1,448,125.00 1,482,519.63 1,493,500.80 4.08% U.S. Treasury AA+1.13%2/29/2028 12/5/2023 974 215,000.00 189,460.35 198,936.60 201,025.00 4.22% U.S. Treasury AA+0.88%6/30/2026 12/6/2021 365 1,700,000.00 1,676,160.16 1,694,794.42 1,648,253.70 1.19% U.S. Treasury AA+0.63%7/31/2026 1/4/2024 396 680,000.00 621,801.56 655,518.23 656,014.36 4.17% U.S. Treasury AA+1.00%7/31/2028 10/10/2024 1,127 185,000.00 166,312.11 169,658.51 170,525.23 3.88% U.S. Treasury AA+1.25%9/30/2028 12/5/2024 1,188 2,075,000.00 1,862,717.78 1,892,338.10 1,919,294.08 4.18% U.S. Treasury AA+0.88%9/30/2026 12/6/2021 457 1,500,000.00 1,476,621.09 1,493,939.29 1,444,863.00 1.21% U.S. Treasury AA+1.13%10/31/2026 3/19/2025 488 450,000.00 429,328.13 432,875.25 433,916.10 4.09% U.S. Treasury AA+1.25%11/30/2026 2/17/2022 518 1,200,000.00 1,163,390.63 1,189,165.97 1,157,109.60 1.92% U.S. Treasury AA+1.38%12/31/2028 2/5/2024 1,280 75,000.00 66,249.02 68,750.70 69,278.33 4.02% U.S. Treasury AA+2.88%4/30/2029 9/25/2024 1,400 295,000.00 286,518.75 287,839.99 285,965.63 3.56% U.S. Treasury AA+2.88%4/30/2029 10/10/2024 1,400 315,000.00 301,477.15 303,476.48 305,353.13 3.91% U.S. Treasury AA+2.75%5/31/2029 7/2/2024 1,431 350,000.00 323,968.75 328,809.11 337,449.35 4.45% U.S. Treasury AA+2.63%5/31/2027 6/3/2022 700 2,000,000.00 1,972,578.13 1,989,485.53 1,958,672.00 2.92% U.S. Treasury AA+2.63%5/31/2027 11/12/2024 700 700,000.00 673,585.94 679,900.04 685,535.20 4.20% U.S. Treasury AA+2.75%7/31/2027 8/10/2022 761 1,000,000.00 990,351.56 995,962.11 980,391.00 2.96% U.S. Treasury AA+3.88%9/30/2029 6/5/2025 1,553 2,000,000.00 1,993,046.88 1,993,158.48 2,008,906.00 3.96% U.S. Treasury AA+4.13%10/31/2027 12/8/2022 853 1,500,000.00 1,522,441.41 1,510,693.56 1,513,534.50 3.79% U.S. Treasury AA+3.88%11/30/2029 2/7/2025 1,614 1,600,000.00 1,568,250.00 1,570,621.18 1,606,812.80 4.34% U.S. Treasury AA+3.50%1/31/2028 2/2/2023 945 1,800,000.00 1,788,820.31 1,794,214.02 1,790,649.00 3.64% U.S. Treasury AA+4.00%2/29/2028 3/1/2023 974 1,125,000.00 1,116,342.77 1,120,386.92 1,133,393.63 4.17% U.S. Treasury AA+3.63%3/31/2030 5/13/2025 1,735 590,000.00 577,185.94 577,505.54 585,713.06 4.12% U.S. Treasury AA+3.50%4/30/2028 5/3/2023 1,035 855,000.00 850,791.79 852,614.43 850,257.32 3.61% U.S. Treasury AA+4.38%8/31/2028 11/5/2024 1,158 2,000,000.00 2,012,734.38 2,010,700.96 2,039,140.00 4.19% U.S. Treasury AA+4.00%1/15/2027 2/18/2025 564 205,000.00 204,023.05 204,205.40 205,480.52 4.26% U.S. Treasury AA+4.00%1/15/2027 3/4/2025 564 900,000.00 900,000.00 900,000.00 902,109.60 4.00% U.S. Treasury AA+4.25%2/28/2029 11/12/2024 1,339 440,000.00 441,529.69 441,321.32 447,682.84 4.16% U.S. Treasury AA+4.50%5/31/2029 12/12/2024 1,431 300,000.00 304,828.13 304,277.75 308,144.40 4.10% U.S. Treasury AA+4.38%7/31/2026 10/10/2024 396 355,000.00 357,024.61 356,230.93 356,414.32 4.04% City of Rancho Mirage
City Operating Funds
as of June 30, 2025
Investment Detail
94 Issuer
S&P
Rating Coupon Maturity Purchased
Days to
Maturity
Par
Amount
Original
Cost
Adjusted
Cost
Market
Value
Yield to
Maturity
City of Rancho Mirage
as of June 30, 2025
Investment Detail
U.S. Treasury AA+3.75%8/31/2026 9/5/2024 427 430,000.00 429,563.28 429,740.31 428,958.54 3.80% U.S. Treasury AA+4.13%10/31/2029 5/22/2025 1,584 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 1,318,383.30 4.12% U.S. Treasury AA+3.75%5/15/2028 5/21/2025 1,050 350,000.00 348,167.97 348,233.71 350,464.80 3.94% U.S. Treasuries Subtotal 865 46,110,000.00 44,782,543.59 45,193,642.85 45,071,119.65 3.27% Corporate Notes
Accenture Capital Inc.AA-4.05%10/4/2029 10/4/2024 1,557 295,000.00 294,483.75 294,554.64 293,010.23 4.09% American Express A-4.73%4/25/2029 4/25/2025 1,395 365,000.00 365,000.00 365,000.00 369,057.71 4.73% American Honda Finance Corporation A-4.90%7/9/2027 7/10/2024 739 235,000.00 234,696.85 234,790.83 237,857.60 4.95% American Honda Finance Corporation A-4.90%7/9/2027 8/23/2024 739 385,000.00 390,309.15 388,800.56 389,681.60 4.38% Analog Devices Inc A-4.50%6/15/2030 6/16/2025 1,811 650,000.00 649,428.00 649,434.32 655,108.35 4.52% Astrazeneca Finance LLC A+1.75%5/28/2028 5/7/2025 1,063 325,000.00 301,879.50 302,947.44 304,632.25 4.26% Astrazeneca Finance LLC A+4.85%2/26/2029 2/26/2024 1,337 260,000.00 259,727.00 259,794.42 265,852.08 4.87% BMW Corporate A 3.75%4/12/2028 9/27/2024 1,017 365,000.00 358,722.00 359,995.47 359,712.61 0.00% BMW Corporate A 5.05%3/21/2030 3/21/2025 1,725 310,000.00 309,919.40 309,924.04 315,827.38 5.06% Bank of America A-4.62%5/9/2029 5/9/2025 1,409 640,000.00 640,000.00 640,000.00 644,056.96 4.62% Blackrock Funding Inc AA-2.40%4/30/2030 6/27/2025 1,765 475,000.00 436,012.00 436,094.74 437,061.28 4.30% Blackrock Funding Inc AA-2.40%4/30/2030 6/30/2025 1,765 250,000.00 229,440.00 229,451.60 230,032.25 4.30% BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO A 4.90%2/22/2029 2/22/2024 1,333 195,000.00 194,590.50 194,692.29 199,628.52 4.95% BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO A 4.90%2/22/2029 2/22/2024 1,333 215,000.00 215,518.15 215,387.11 220,103.24 4.85% Caterpillar Inc A 4.40%10/15/2027 8/16/2024 837 500,000.00 501,270.00 500,935.84 503,427.50 4.32% Chevron USA Inc.AA-4.48%2/26/2028 2/26/2025 971 750,000.00 750,000.00 750,000.00 758,822.25 4.48% Cintas Corp. No. 2 A-4.20%5/1/2028 5/2/2025 1,036 260,000.00 259,667.20 259,684.68 260,582.66 4.25% Cisco Systems Inc AA-4.55%2/24/2028 2/24/2025 969 45,000.00 44,993.70 44,994.45 45,588.38 4.56% Cisco Systems Inc AA-4.55%2/24/2028 2/24/2025 969 375,000.00 374,970.00 374,974.10 379,903.13 4.55% HSBC USA Inc.A-4.65%6/3/2028 6/3/2025 1,069 200,000.00 199,906.00 199,908.68 201,573.00 4.67% HSBC USA Inc.A-4.65%6/3/2028 6/3/2025 1,069 440,000.00 440,035.20 440,034.49 443,460.60 4.65% Hershey Company A 4.75%2/24/2030 2/24/2025 1,700 335,000.00 334,410.40 334,447.73 341,601.18 4.79% Cisco Systems Inc AA-4.75%2/24/2030 2/24/2025 1,700 350,000.00 349,737.50 349,754.64 357,744.10 4.77% Citibank NA Corp A+4.58%5/29/2027 5/29/2025 698 500,000.00 500,245.00 500,234.22 502,696.00 4.55% Citibank NA Corp A+4.91%5/29/2030 5/29/2025 1,794 350,000.00 350,000.00 350,000.00 356,644.05 4.91% Comcast Corp.A-2.35%1/15/2027 10/14/2022 564 200,000.00 178,762.00 192,314.92 194,554.00 5.16% Cummins Inc A 4.25%5/9/2028 5/9/2025 1,044 45,000.00 44,968.50 44,969.95 45,200.12 4.28% Goldman Sachs Bank A+5.41%5/21/2027 5/21/2024 690 335,000.00 335,000.00 335,000.00 337,748.34 5.41% Home Depot Inc.A 4.75%6/25/2029 6/25/2024 1,456 100,000.00 99,355.00 99,473.85 102,081.00 4.90% Home Depot Inc.A 4.75%6/25/2029 6/25/2024 1,456 150,000.00 149,521.50 149,610.14 153,121.50 4.82% National Australia Bank AA-5.09%6/11/2027 6/11/2024 711 650,000.00 650,910.00 650,605.41 662,151.75 5.04% National Rural Coop Corporate A-5.15%6/15/2029 7/10/2024 1,446 400,000.00 403,572.00 402,921.05 411,693.20 4.94% National Rural Coop Corporate NR 4.95%2/7/2030 2/7/2025 1,683 280,000.00 279,571.60 279,602.77 286,366.36 4.98% National Secs Clearing AA+5.00%5/30/2028 4/23/2025 1,065 325,000.00 330,453.50 330,133.33 331,950.78 4.31% National Secs Clearing AA+4.70%5/20/2030 5/20/2025 1,785 675,000.00 674,581.50 674,591.92 686,290.73 4.71% National Secs Clearing AA+4.70%5/20/2030 5/20/2025 1,785 260,000.00 260,470.60 260,461.78 264,349.02 4.66% Target Corp A 4.35%6/15/2028 6/10/2025 1,081 110,000.00 109,998.90 109,999.09 110,651.64 4.35% JP Morgan Chase A 5.04%1/23/2028 1/23/2024 937 480,000.00 480,000.00 480,000.00 484,566.72 5.04% JP Morgan Chase A 5.57%4/22/2028 4/22/2024 1,027 235,000.00 235,000.00 235,000.00 239,853.69 5.57% Johnson & Johnson AAA 4.70%3/1/2030 3/4/2025 1,705 675,000.00 683,700.75 683,179.34 690,827.40 4.41% Kenvue Inc.A 5.05%3/22/2028 6/30/2025 996 460,000.00 470,860.60 470,850.13 471,017.92 4.12% Eli Lilly & Co A+4.20%8/14/2029 8/14/2024 1,506 95,000.00 94,791.95 94,825.81 95,341.53 4.25% Eli Lilly & Co A+4.55%2/12/2028 6/27/2025 957 295,000.00 298,610.80 298,595.88 298,932.06 4.05% Eli Lilly & Co A+4.75%2/12/2030 2/12/2025 1,688 370,000.00 369,789.10 369,804.41 379,295.51 4.76% Lockheed Martin A-4.50%2/15/2029 3/7/2024 1,326 455,000.00 449,339.80 450,723.23 459,332.51 4.78% Mars Inc.A 4.80%3/1/2030 3/12/2025 1,705 180,000.00 179,805.60 179,816.23 182,311.56 4.83% Mars Inc.A 4.80%3/1/2030 3/12/2025 1,705 170,000.00 170,204.00 170,193.19 172,183.14 4.77% Mercedes-Benz Fin NA Corporate A 4.90%11/15/2027 11/22/2024 868 275,000.00 274,914.75 274,931.24 278,107.50 4.91% Mercedes-Benz Fin NA Corporate A 5.10%11/15/2029 11/15/2024 1,599 350,000.00 349,741.00 349,770.93 356,151.60 5.12% Paccar Financial Corp A+4.55%3/3/2028 3/3/2025 977 635,000.00 634,612.65 634,654.05 643,990.33 4.57% Roche Holdings Inc AA 5.34%11/13/2028 1/9/2024 1,232 400,000.00 413,416.00 409,555.16 415,079.60 4.56% 95 Issuer
S&P
Rating Coupon Maturity Purchased
Days to
Maturity
Par
Amount
Original
Cost
Adjusted
Cost
Market
Value
Yield to
Maturity
City of Rancho Mirage
as of June 30, 2025
Investment Detail
State Street Corp Notes A 4.73%2/28/2030 2/28/2025 1,704 630,000.00 630,000.00 630,000.00 639,380.70 4.73% State Street Corp Notes A 4.73%2/28/2030 2/28/2025 1,704 670,000.00 670,623.10 670,585.26 679,976.30 4.71% Toyota Motor Corp A+4.80%5/15/2030 5/15/2025 1,780 310,000.00 309,646.60 309,655.15 314,900.79 4.83% UBS AG Stamford CT A+4.86%1/10/2028 1/10/2025 924 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 252,016.75 4.86% USAA Capital AA-4.38%6/1/2028 6/2/2025 1,067 250,000.00 249,527.50 249,539.83 251,649.25 4.44% Corporate Notes Subtotal 1,299 19,785,000.00 19,716,710.60 19,727,200.34 19,964,738.21 4.58% Bank Notes
Morgan Stanley A+4.95%1/14/2028 5/3/2024 928 625,000.00 615,987.50 618,628.63 629,989.38 5.39% Morgan Stanley A+5.50%5/26/2028 5/30/2024 1,061 625,000.00 625,756.25 625,495.99 637,980.62 5.47% Bank Notes Subtotal 1,989 1,250,000.00 1,241,743.75 1,244,124.62 1,267,970.00 5.43% Federal Agencies
Federal Home Loan Banks AA+0.83%2/10/2027 8/19/2022 590 680,000.00 609,014.80 654,487.63 647,848.92 3.36% Federal Agencies Subtotal 590 680,000.00 609,014.80 654,487.63 647,848.92 3.36% ACMBS
FNA 2018-M2 AA+3.00%1/1/2028 4/8/2025 915 870,380.94 845,697.48 847,616.62 846,790.14 4.07% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+3.22%3/1/2027 8/18/2023 609 1,000,000.00 943,281.25 972,712.03 984,775.00 4.94% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+3.24%4/1/2027 8/24/2023 640 900,000.00 846,703.13 873,613.81 885,699.90 5.01% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+3.12%6/1/2027 8/22/2023 701 795,000.00 743,449.22 768,385.93 780,843.44 4.97% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+3.60%1/1/2028 7/24/2024 915 850,000.00 821,279.30 828,469.09 840,246.25 4.64% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+3.30%11/1/2027 7/5/2024 854 450,000.00 427,552.73 433,691.06 442,369.80 4.90% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+3.29%11/1/2027 7/5/2024 854 900,000.00 854,156.25 866,688.93 884,040.30 4.91% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+2.28%7/1/2026 12/15/2023 366 464,088.13 435,807.76 452,535.30 455,076.93 4.75% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+2.31%10/1/2027 1/11/2024 823 620,148.00 584,973.97 597,964.97 603,044.94 3.91% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+2.12%3/1/2029 4/15/2025 1,340 930,000.00 859,487.11 862,958.21 870,679.95 4.20% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.38%12/1/2028 1/5/2024 1,250 658,140.93 653,050.62 654,574.87 659,216.99 4.55% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.82%6/1/2028 1/22/2024 1,067 575,000.00 581,064.45 579,088.65 585,294.80 4.56% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.65%8/1/2028 9/14/2023 1,128 850,000.00 837,425.95 841,625.12 862,229.80 4.99% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.80%9/1/2028 9/28/2023 1,159 840,000.00 829,959.48 833,097.38 855,918.00 5.07% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.74%8/1/2028 10/19/2023 1,128 845,000.00 826,464.08 832,411.02 859,408.10 5.25% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.85%9/1/2028 10/31/2023 1,159 635,000.00 614,754.30 620,795.01 647,942.57 5.60% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+5.07%10/1/2028 11/21/2023 1,189 310,000.00 309,103.79 309,371.56 318,285.06 5.14% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+5.07%10/1/2028 1/22/2024 1,189 405,000.00 413,922.66 411,430.39 415,824.03 4.55% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.86%10/1/2028 12/7/2023 1,189 475,000.00 473,635.33 474,036.64 485,306.55 4.93% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+5.00%11/1/2028 12/21/2023 1,220 430,000.00 434,015.34 432,874.74 440,931.03 4.79% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.72%12/1/2028 1/18/2024 1,250 485,000.00 489,844.67 488,534.04 493,578.68 4.50% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.57%12/1/2028 2/8/2024 1,250 500,000.00 504,999.50 503,680.65 506,413.00 4.34% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.57%12/1/2028 6/6/2024 1,250 350,000.00 344,531.25 345,702.90 354,489.10 4.95% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+5.40%1/1/2029 6/3/2024 1,281 840,000.00 849,154.69 847,230.15 872,169.48 5.14% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.80%5/1/2029 6/13/2024 1,401 850,000.00 849,997.45 850,000.00 868,433.95 4.80% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.72%5/1/2029 7/25/2024 1,401 695,000.00 699,267.99 698,574.89 708,418.37 4.58% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.54%7/1/2029 8/15/2024 1,462 770,000.00 777,202.58 776,038.76 780,087.77 4.33% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.51%7/1/2029 10/25/2024 1,462 850,000.00 851,261.72 851,114.77 860,383.60 4.47% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+4.79%9/1/2029 10/16/2024 1,524 500,000.00 509,993.50 508,694.41 511,521.50 4.34% ACMBS Subtotal 1,094 19,642,758.00 19,212,037.55 19,363,511.90 19,679,419.03 4.74% City Operating Total 892 $101,695,913.50 $99,790,205.79 $100,411,122.84 $100,866,753.55 3.93% First American Treasury Oblig. Fund AAAm 3.80%7/1/25 6/30/25 1 60,076.04 60,076.04 60,076.04 60,076.04 3.80% Successor Agency
96 Issuer
S&P
Rating Coupon Maturity Purchased
Days to
Maturity
Par
Amount
Original
Cost
Adjusted
Cost
Market
Value
Yield to
Maturity
City of Rancho Mirage
as of June 30, 2025
Investment Detail
LAIF-Successor Agency NR 4.40%7/1/25 6/30/25 1 3,068,298.27 3,068,298.27 3,068,298.27 3,068,298.27 4.40% Cash Equivalents Subtotal 1 3,128,374.31 3,128,374.31 3,128,374.31 3,128,374.31 4.39% U.S. Treasuries
U.S. Treasury AA+1.25%3/31/2028 10/24/2024 1,005 840,000.00 765,515.63 779,594.38 786,417.24 4.04% U.S. Treasury AA+1.25%3/31/2028 12/16/2024 1,005 745,000.00 677,746.29 688,168.12 697,477.20 4.22% U.S. Treasuries Subtotal 1,005 1,585,000.00 1,443,261.92 1,467,762.50 1,483,894.44 4.12% Federal Agencies
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation AA+0.38%9/23/2025 9/25/2020 85 420,000.00 418,903.80 419,950.01 416,173.38 0.43% Federal Agencies Subtotal 85 420,000.00 418,903.80 419,950.01 416,173.38 0.43% Successor Agency Total 304 $5,133,374.31 $4,990,540.03 $5,016,086.82 $5,028,442.13 3.98% First American Treasury Oblig. Fund AAAm 3.80%7/1/25 6/30/25 1 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 3.80% Cash Equivalents Subtotal 1 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 1,277,756.92 3.80% City Assessment District Bond Funds Total 1 $1,277,756.92 $1,277,756.92 $1,277,756.92 $1,277,756.92 3.80% Portfolio Total 853 $108,107,044.73 $106,058,502.74 $106,704,966.58 $107,172,952.60 3.93% Rancho Mirage Energy Authority Lockbox NR 0.00%7/1/25 6/30/25 1 777,154.23 777,154.23 777,154.23 777,154.23 0.00% Rancho Mirage Energy Authority ICS Sweep NR 0.00%7/1/25 6/30/25 1 17,339,340.48 17,339,340.48 17,339,340.48 17,339,340.48 4.15% Rancho Mirage Energy Authority Subtotal 1 18,116,494.71 18,116,494.71 18,116,494.71 18,116,494.71 4.10% Grand Total 730 $126,223,539.44 $124,174,997.45 $124,821,461.29 $125,289,447.31 3.36% Market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of the month as supplied by Interactive Data, Bloomberg Finance LP or Telerate. Where prices are not available from generally recognized sources the securities are priced using a yield-based matrix system to arrive at an estimated market value. Prices that fall between data points are interpolated.
Rancho Mirage Energy Authority
City Assessment District Bond Funds
97 Balance Investment Type
Operating Cash 2,242,294.34$ City Pool
Endowment Cash 519,566.00 City Pool
Endowment Total 519,566.00
Total Cash 2,761,860.34$
Library Foundation Investment Summary
As of June 30, 2025
98 Nonprofit Organization Investment Type Cash Balance
Joslyn Center City Pool 10,585.80$
Total Nonprofit Investments 10,585.80$
Nonprofit Organizations Investment Summary
As of June 30, 2025
99 1
Joseph Carpenter, PHR
From:Joseph Carpenter, PHR
Sent:Wednesday, August 13, 2025 10:29 AM
To:City Council
Cc:Kofi Antobam, CPA,CFE,CIA; Isaiah Hagerman, CPA
Subject:June 30, 2025 Quarterly Treasurer's Report
Attachments:Rancho Mirage Quarterly Report_06-30-25.pdf City Council,
Attached is the June 30, 2025, Quarterly Treasurer’s Report. This report will be on the September 4th Council agenda as a receive and file item. The City’s Investment Policy requires that the City Council receive the report no later than 45 days after the end of the quarter. This email will be attached to the staƯ report for record keeping purposes noting the 45-day requirement was met.
If you have any questions regarding the attached report please don’t hesitate to contact me, Mr. Antobam, or Mr.
Hagerman.
Thank you,
ATTACHMENT 2
100
City Council Staff Report
Contracts
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5K.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Kofi Antobam, Director of Administrative Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the terms of the contracts as presented and authorize the City Manager to execute the subject contracts.
DISCUSSION
Attached hereto is a contracts list that staff is requesting the City Council to approve. These are contracts for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 for services for which costs and terms were negotiated.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Contract List
101
ATTACHMENT 1
Contracts List
# Name Terms Scope Effective
Date
Expiration
Date
Compensation Sole
Source
Yes/No
Department Staff
1 Tyler Technologies, Inc. 1 Year Software License and
Maintenance Support.
09/04/2025 06/30/2026 $192,170.00 No Information
Services
Jason Jaurigue
2 NAI Consulting Inc. 2 Years Professional Services - CP 14-313 – Ramon Road/Bob
Hope Drive and Sand
Fencing Improvements.
09/04/2025 09/04/2027 $40,831.00 No Public Works Ryan Stendell 3 CNS Engineers Inc. 1 Year Professional Services –
Development of Preventive
Bridge Maintenance
Program Plan.
09/04/2025 09/30/2027 $41,000.00 No Public Works Stephan Longoria
4 NV5 Inc 9 Months Amendment – On-Call
Engineering/Land
Surveying Services.
09/04/2025 06/30/2026 $45,000.00 No Public Works Ryan Stendell 5 HR Green Inc. 9 Months Amendment – On-Call
Engineering and Plan
Review Services.
09/04/2025 06/30/2026 $40,000.00 No Public Works Ryan Stendell 6 Jennifer Yount
Photography
9 Months Citywide special event
photography services.
09/04/2025 06/30/2026 $48,500.00 No Marketing Hayley Tice
102
CONTRACT SUMMARY
FROM: Jason Jaurigue, Director of Information Services
DATE: September 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Annual Tyler Technologies Software Maintenance Agreement. ____________________________________________________________________
Background:
On June 16, 2022, the City entered into a Software Maintenance Agreement with Tyler Technologies, Inc. for software licenses and ongoing support. The agreement includes automatic one-year extensions unless terminated in writing by either party. It provides the City with access to the Tyler Enterprise ERP financial management system, covering core modules such as General Ledger, Accounts Payable, and Cash Management, as well as the Tyler Enterprise Permitting & Licensing (EPL) system, including Tyler Payments, Permitting, and the Citizen Access Portal.
The Software Maintenance Agreement ensures ongoing vendor support for these critical applications, including future upgrades, technical assistance, and access to a knowledge base of best practices.
Fiscal Impact:
The annual cost for software maintenance is $192,170.00. This amount covers the City’s licensed suite of ERP and EPL, along with associated services.
Funds for the software and support services are included in the Information Services Department’s approved and adopted FY 2025/26 operating budget. Funding for future years will be requested through the City’s annual budget process.
103
CONTRACT SUMMARY
FROM: Ryan Stendell, Assistant City Manager
DATE: September 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with NAI Consulting Inc. for Construction Phase Support Services related to City Project 14-313 (Ramon Road/Bob Hope Drive & Sand Fencing Improvements).
____________________________________________________________________ Background:
In calendar year 2014, the City was awarded grant funding from Congenstion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) which is a federally funded program administered by CalTrans focused on roadway projects that can help improve air quality. The funded project occurs in two distinct locations; firstly at the intersection of Bob Hope Drive and Ramon Road the project will install a free right turn pocket allowing southbound traffic to merge onto westbound Ramon Road more efficiently. Secondly, the project funds a stretch of sand fencing along the north side of Dinah Shore Drive generally between Bob Hope Drive and Key Largo Avenue.
The project recently completed its Right-of-Way acquisition phase and was deemed ready to move to construction by CalTrans. NAI Consulting Inc. has been on contract from the beginning of this project to provide assistance with CalTrans Compliance.
Complying with the requirements of the CMAQ funding is cumbersome, and staff is attempting to keep NAI Consulting Inc. on contract through the construction phase.
NAI’s knowledge of the required process, documentation, and relationships at CalTrans make them valuable to staff. If a program or project is found to be out of compliance the agency ultimately risks its ability to seek reimbursement of the grant funding.
Fiscal Impact:
Staff is requesting to increase the current contracted amount by $40,831.00 with NAI Consulting Inc. Funds are available in 10134000 (Capital Improvement Projects) for this request.
Attachment: Consultant Proposal
104
68-955 Adelina Road
Cathedral City, CA 92234
[760] 323-5344
August 1, 2025
City of Rancho Mirage
Attention: Ryan Stendell, Director of Public Works
City of Rancho Mirage
69825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, California 92270
Subject: Contract Change Order 2 Request regarding the Caltrans Compliance Consultant Services for Congestion Mitigation Improvements on Ramon Road and Sand Fence Installation along Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive - CP 14-313; CML-5412(016)
Dear Mr. Stendell,
NAI Consulting, Inc. (NAI) respectfully requests a second contract change order regarding the Caltrans Compliance services provided for the Congestion Mitigation Improvements on Ramon Road and Sand Fence Installation along Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive.
Since the commencement of our contract in 2019, NAI has supported the City of Rancho Mirage (City) in maintaining federal aid compliance throughout the final design and the right-of-way phases of this project. As the project enters the construction phase, the City has requested additional support for office engineering services during construction. To address this, NAI proposes to provide construction support services for the 75-calendar day duration of construction. The additional services will include supporting federal compliance documentation, labor compliance coordination, participation in construction meetings, progress payment assistance, and related activities as described in the attached revised scope of work.
In support of the labor compliance requirements, NAI proposes to bring in a subconsultant, Dynamic Engineering Services, Inc. (DESI). DESI will provide specialized support by reviewing Certified Payroll Reports for prevailing wage compliance and assisting the City by comparing employee interview documentation with the submitted payroll records to help verify proper wage payments.
To provide these services and to help ensure the City’s ongoing compliance with Caltrans and federal requirements, we respectfully request an additional budget of $40,831.00 under this contract. The attached revised scope and fee schedule outlines the anticipated work and associated costs.
Should the City require additional services beyond those described in the attached scope, NAI would be happy to provide a supplemental scope and fee proposal as needed. ~NAI
~~ Consulting
105
We truly value our ongoing relationship with the City of Rancho Mirage and look forward to supporting the successful completion of this important project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need further information.
Respectfully submitted,
NAI Consulting, Inc.
Joshua Nickerson, P.E.
Vice President
Attachments: Revised Work Plan; Revised Fee.
106
Work Plan and Technical Approach [7]
CALTRANS COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT SERVICES – CMAQ PROJECT
CP 14-313 | CML-5412(016)
Including Contract Change Order 1 [CCO1] and
Contract Change Order 2 [CCO2] Additions.
WORK PLAN AND TECHNICAL APPROACH
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Rancho Mirage successfully received federal funding from the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program to implement congestion mitigation improvements along Ramon Road as well as sand fencing along Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive. As outlined in the RFP, the project will consist of minor widening along the north side of Ramon Road to carry six (6) lanes of traffic to the intersection of Bob Hope Drive. This will include constuction of curb and gutter while maintaining existing drainage patterns as much as feasible. At the intersection of Ramon Road and Bob Hope Drive, the City plans to constuct a free right turn for southbound Bob Hope Drive traffic to westbound Ramon Road. The intersection will be improved to include a “porkchop” island for the existing signal poles on the northwest corner.
The bus stop along Ramon Road will be relocated further west to accommodate the free right turn traffic and sidewalk will be constucted from the intersection of Ramon Road and Bob Hope Drive westerly to the relocated bus stop for complete ADA access. The project will also include the constuction of two rows of sand fencing set back at 40 feet and 70 feet behind the curb along Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive between Bob Hope Drive and Key Largo Avenue.
The City has received the federal authorization to proceed with Preliminary Engineering and has completed the preliminary design and received approval of the NEPA Categorical Exclusion.
The remaining phases of the project including final design, right-of-way clearance, and construction management are set to begin and NAI is ready to jump in and assist the City in delivering these improvements.
After review of the project background in the RFP, most of the remaining federal compliance tasks are common to all federally funded projects and include updating the City’s Project Specifcation Package to include the most recent federal provisions, Right-of-Way Support, preparing the Request for Authorization for Construction, the Award Package, reimbursement requests, and Final Report of Expenditures as described in the RFP.
However, there are several project features that will require special attention.
Utility Relocation
According to the City, a Southern California Edison (SCE) vault will be in conflict with the proposed right turn lane and will need to be lowered to the finished grade. The air vents for the vault will also have to be relocated. It will be imperative for the City to coordinate with SCE early on in the final design to determine who is liable for these costs. If the vault can be relocated within existing right-of-way, the City may consider having SCE relocate the vault prior to construction. However, if the vault must be lowered as indicated in the RFP, then this work will need to be coordinated into the final design. The final decision on the utility relocation will impact the development of the Right-of-Way Certification. In addition, if it is discovered that SCE has senior rights and the City is liable for these costs, then the City will need Caltrans and FHWA to review the Utility Agreement and FHWA will need to provide Specific Authorization ~
lllltTai
107
Work Plan and Technical Approach [8]
CALTRANS COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT SERVICES – CMAQ PROJECT
CP 14-313 | CML-5412(016)
before federal funds can be used for this relocation. NAI has completed numerous projects involving utility relocations, including relocations in which the utility has senior rights. We are prepared to assist the City in these efforts to ensure federal complaince is maintained.
Right-of-Way
In our due diligence, NAI recognizes that the City has programmed right-of-way funds in fiscal year 19/20 of the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). While the RFP states that the free right turn lane will feed into an acceleration lane along Ramon Road within existing right-of-way, should right-of-way be required for any of the other improvements such as the bus stop relocation or the sand fence installation, special consideration will be provided to ensure the right-of-way costs remain eligible for federal reimbursement. The status of the final right-of- way, including access easments for the sand fence installation if necessary, will factor into the development of the Right-of-Way Certification. Since some right-of-way rights are necessary for the project then the project will require a standard Right-of-Way Certification (13B) form and cannot use the shortform (13A).
Construction Management
While the RFP states that the scope does not include Construction Management, NAI recognizes that the City may need to solicit proposals for selection of a consultant to manage the construction. If the City would like this Construction Management contract to be federally reimbursable, special attention will be required for the procurement. NAI speciallizes in assisting our clients through the federal procurement standards including establishing the DBE goal for the contract and coordinating with Caltrans accordingly to ensure the City submits the correct documents when required to keep the contract eligible for reimbursement. NAI has prepared an optional scope should the City decide to utilize us in this regard.
In order to provide the services requested in the RFP, NAI is prepared to provide the City of Rancho Mirage with the following work plan.
WORK PLAN
TASK 1: PS&E Support
In accordance with Chapter 12 – Plans, Specifications, and Estimate of the LAPM, NAI will assist the City in complying with all federal aid requirements of the plans, specifications, and estimate.
Task 1.1: Review and Update City Specifications – As the design nears completion, NAI will update the City of Rancho Mirage’s project specifications to include all necessary federal language. Regardless of whether or not the project will use the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (“Greenbook”), the Caltrans Standard Specifications, or a combination of both, the bid proposal, contract documents, and general provisions must include specific federal specifications and forms to be eligible for reimbursement of federal funds. This will include using the final engineer’s estimate to determine the construction DBE goal, trainee goal, liquidated damages, and other information as required. It is expected that Rancho Mirage will provide NAI with an editable specification document so that NAI can insert the appropriate federal language. The location of the federal clauses is subjective and will be subject to Rancho Mirage approval. NAI will review the City’s Quality Assurance Plan for inclusion in the final specifications, however, the City updated this document in 2016 so no changes are anticipated.
~
lllltTai
108
Work Plan and Technical Approach [9]
CALTRANS COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT SERVICES – CMAQ PROJECT
CP 14-313 | CML-5412(016)
Task 1.2: PS&E Checklist - Once the bid package is finalized, NAI will prepare the PS&E Checklist to ensure all federal requirements have been incorporated.
TASK 2: Right-of-Way (ROW) Support
In accordance with Chapter 13 – Right-of-Way of the LAPM, NAI will assist the City in all federal requirements to properly certify Right-of-Way control.
Task 2.1: Utility Coordination – In accordance with standard Rancho Mirage procedures, NAI will assist Rancho Mirage or their consultant in preparing a Utility Agreement or Notice for any impacted utilities. This Agreement/Notice will be used to reach an agreement with each utility concerning the date by which the relocation will be completed, the financial liability for the relocation costs, and who will perform the work.
Task 2.2: Right-of-Way Certification – NAI will assist Rancho Mirage or their consultant in preparing a draft of the ROW Certification for Rancho Mirage to review and approve. NAI expects the project to require a 13B Right-of-Way Certification form to be prepared. Once finalized, this form must be signed by a Rancho Mirage Official who is authorized by Resolution to execute ROW Certifications on behalf of the City. NAI recommends waiting for the ROW Certification to be approved before submitting the RFA for Construction, though they can be submitted simultaneously if necessary due to timing.
[CCO 1]
Task 2.3: Right of Way Phase Authorization – NAI will prepare the Request for Authorization (RFA) to proceed with right of way package in accordance with the updated Authorization form. The following forms will be included in the submittal:
• Authorization Form 3A;
• Right of Way Maps (to be provided by the City);
• FTIP Document;
• NEPA Document with Revalidation;
• DBE Goal for the Consultant Contract – Task 7
NAI may be required to respond to comments or update the Authorization Form (3A) depending on the time it takes Caltrans to process this request.
[CCO 1]
Task 2.4: Meetings – NAI will attend Project meetings with the Right of Way Consultant selected under Task 7 in order to review the project status and provide recommendations regarding the Right of Way process and the impacts to the federal funding. It is assumed that the meetings will be no more than one a month for up to 48 months from the kickoff meeting with the Right of Way Consultant.
TASK 3: Request for Authorization to Proceed with Construction Package NAI will prepare the Request for Authorization (RFA) to proceed with construction package in accordance with the updated Authorization form. The following forms will be included in the submittal:
• Authorization Form 3A;
• FTIP Document;
~
lllltTai
109
Work Plan and Technical Approach [10]
CALTRANS COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT SERVICES – CMAQ PROJECT
CP 14-313 | CML-5412(016)
• NEPA Document with Revalidation;
• Right-of-Way Certification – Task 2.2;
• Specific Authorization for Utility Relocation, if necessary – Task 2.1; • PS&E Package;
• PS&E Checklist – Task 1.2; and
• DBE Goal – Task 1.1.
NAI may be required to respond to comments or update the Authorization Form (3A) depending on the time it takes Caltrans to process this request.
[CCO 1]
Task 3.1: Cost and Scope Changes – NAI will assist the City to prepare all documents necessary to coordinate with Caltrans, RCTC, and CVAG, to implement a cost adjustment in the Right of Way Phase to shift funds from PE to ROW. NAI will also assist the City in modifying the scope of work to reduce the sand fence scope along properties who have refused to provide necessary rights of way.
This will include drafting letters to each agency explaining the changes and their reasons, reviewing documents to ensure that the changes are reflected in the FTIP, submitting the RFA for the Right of Way Cost Adjustment, and updating the NEPA Revalidation form to reflect the scope change.
[CCO 1]
Task 3.2: Federal Aid Management – NAI understands that this project may extend through multiple years. As such, there are general federal aid management updates that will be required throughout the life of the project. NAI will assist the City to update the City’s Quality Assurance Plan, which must be updated every 5 years, submit annual Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) certifications each year, and submit time extension requests to Caltrans to ensure the Project End Date does not expire as necessary.
TASK 4: Bid/Award Assistance and Award Package
In accordance with Chapter 15 – Advertise and Award Project of the LAPM, NAI will assist Rancho Mirage in bidding the project. NAI will perform the following tasks during bidding:
• Update the project specifications to include the appropriate bid dates and times pending approval of the RFA for Construction;
• Prepare the Local Agency Project Advertising Checklist (Form 15C); • Attend the Prebid meeting to provide information regarding the federal regulations to interested bidders;
• Prepare addendums to the specifications; and
• Other items as necessary during the bidding of the project.
NAI will assist Rancho Mirage in the award of the project. NAI will perform the following tasks for awarding the contract:
• Prepare the bid summary;
• Prepare the Local Agency Bid Opening Checklist (Form 15I); • Perform due diligence on the expected low bidder;
• Review DBE Good Faith Efforts;
~
lllltTai
110
Work Plan and Technical Approach [11]
CALTRANS COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT SERVICES – CMAQ PROJECT
CP 14-313 | CML-5412(016)
• Write the Staff Report; and
• Other items as necessary to award the project.
Once the project is awarded, NAI will prepare the Award Package in accordance with Chapter 15 of the LAPM. The Award Package will include:
• Low bid documentation including DBE Commitment (Form 15G) and DBE Good Faith Efforts (Form 15H);
• Local Agency Contract Award Checklist (Form 15L);
• Project Detail Estimate and Summary (Form 15M);
• Updated Finance Letter with low bid information (Form 3O); and • Resident Engineer’s Construction Contract Administration Checklist (Form 15B).
The Resident Engineer’s Construction Contract Administration Checklist must be signed by the Resident Engineer, if different than the person in responsible charge of the project at Rancho Mirage.
TASK 5: Federal Reimbursement Requests
NAI will prepare the federal reimbursement requests in accordance with Chapter 5 – Invoicing of the LAPM as requested by Rancho Mirage. The reimbursement requests will include preparing the federal invoice (Form 5A) in conformance with the paid consultant or contractor billings, and the billing summary (Form 5K) for tracking purposes. Regardless of whether NAI is requested to prepare these billings, NAI requests that Rancho Mirage send NAI copies of all reimbursement requests sent to Caltrans to assist with the Final Report of Expenditures. NAI expects that Rancho Mirage will provide NAI with the necessary invoices and proof of payment for any costs to be reimbursed.
The fee includes ten (10) reimbursement requests which is assumed to be approximately one request per quarter over the next two years.
[CCO1]
The fee is updated to include an additional ten (10) reimbursement requests extending the length of delivery for an additional two years, estimating a project completion in four years from the start of the Right of Way phase.
TASK 6: Final Report of Expenditures Package
NAI will prepare the Final Report of Expenditures package in accordance with Chapter 17 – Project Completion of the LAPM and based on final project costs paid to the contractor. The Final Report package will include:
• Cover Letter and Checklist (Form 17A);
• Local Agency Final Inspection Form (Form 17C);
• Final Detail Estimate and Summary (Form 15M);
• Change Order Summary (Form 17E);
• Final Report of Utilization of DBE (Form 17F) prepared by contractor; • Material Certificate (Form 17G);
• DBE Certification Status Change (Form 17O) prepared by contractor; and • Final Invoice (Form 17D).
~
lllltTai
111
Work Plan and Technical Approach [12]
CALTRANS COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT SERVICES – CMAQ PROJECT
CP 14-313 | CML-5412(016)
The Final Invoice may require a cost adjustment which includes an updated Finance Letter (Form 3O) in order to fully capture the federal funds authorized. NAI will prepare the cost adjustment under this contract if necessary.
OPTIONAL TASK 7: Assist with Consultant Selection
In accordance with Chapter 10 – Consultant Selection of the LAPM, NAI will review the City prepared Request for Proposals (RFP) to select the most qualified firm to for Construction Management.
[CCO1]
NAI will also assist the City to select the most qualified firm for the Right of Way Acquisitions.
Task 7.1: Finalize RFP - NAI will review the RFP and add any federal language necessary.
In addition, NAI will prepare an Independent Cost Estimate for the City to use during negotiations. NAI will use this estimate to determine the appropriate Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal for the RFP. NAI will also review the City’s standard Contract Services Agreement and add any additional federal aid clauses that are required.
Task 7.2: Consultant Selection Process - NAI will coordinate with the City’s Consultant Selection Committee to ensure everyone has signed the Conflict of Interest Statements and is using the appropriate evaluation forms.
Task 7.3: Caltrans Consultant Financial Review - Only Applicable for Contracts over $150,000. Once the City has negotiated a final contract with the top ranked proposer, NAI will assist the City and Design Consultant in compiling the necessary financial documents for submittal to Caltrans.
Task 7.4: Prepare 10-C - NAI will prepare the 10-C Form for Caltrans review and approval before the City can sign the final agreement. This task will include compiling any additional information or forms necessary for the complete submittal.
[CCO 2]
TASK 8: Construction Support
NAI will provide the following construction support services for the City for the duration of the construction phase:
8.1 Weekly Statement of Working Days – NAI will prepare and submit the Weekly Statement of Working Days form on a weekly basis, documenting the contractor’s actual working days for City review and approval.
8.2 Labor Compliance - Review Certified Payroll Reports submitted by the contractor and all subcontractors to ensure compliance with prevailing wage requirements by classification. Coordinate and schedule employee interviews with contractor and subcontractor personnel as required. The NAI team will not conduct the interviews and this scope assumes employee interviews will be conducted in the field by the City inspector. Upon completion of the interviews, review the interview documentation provided by the City and compare the findings to the submitted Certified Payroll Reports.
~
lllltTai
112
Work Plan and Technical Approach [13]
CALTRANS COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT SERVICES – CMAQ PROJECT
CP 14-313 | CML-5412(016)
8.3 Preconstruction Meeting – NAI will coordinate and attend the preconstruction meeting with the City, contractor, and relevant stakeholders. NAI will assist the City with agenda preparation and will review meeting minutes prepared by the City or others to ensure accuracy and completeness.
8.4 Progress Payment Requests – NAI will review contractor progress payment requests and supporting documentation. NAI will assist the City in preparing payment requests, including verification of completed quantities using City-provided quantity sheets. This scope assumes the City’s inspector and resident engineer will provide completed and accurate quantity sheets.
8.5 DBE Coordination – NAI will assist with monitoring Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) compliance, tracking DBE participation, and collecting and submitting required documentation to ensure federal funding requirements are met.
8.6 Construction Progress Meetings (assume weekly) – NAI will coordinate and attend weekly construction meetings with the contractor and City staff. NAI will assist with the preparation of the agenda and meeting minutes for each progress meeting.
8.7 Contract Change Order (CCO) Support – NAI will provide support in the preparation, review, and processing of Contract Change Orders (CCOs), including cost evaluation, time impact analysis, and related documentation in coordination with the City and contractor.
8.8 Construction Oversight Review (assume two meetings with Caltrans) – NAI will coordinate and participate in two construction oversight meetings with Caltrans, including preparing and presenting project documentation.
8.9 General Support – NAI will provide general construction support as needed, including assistance with preparation and coordination of Notice to Proceed (NTP) and Notice of Completion (NOC).
Exclusions: This scope does not include review of Requests for Information (RFI), Submittal Review, Project Filing, Inspection, Material Testing Reviews, Project Acceptances, Utility Coordination, Claims Support, Public Engagement, Conducting Interviews, or Preparing Quantity Sheets.
~
lllltTai
113
Price Summary/Totals
96,820
City Project No. 14-313: CMAQ Project 55,989
40,831
Submitted to: City of Rancho Mirage
Contract Type: Time and Materials
Project Tasks
Task 1: PS&E Support 26 2 6 2 16 2,994 - - 2,994 Task 1.1: Review and Update City Specifications 20 2 4 2 12 2,340 - 2,340 Task 1.2: PS&E Checklist 6 2 4 654 - 654 Task 2: Right of Way Support 100 24 60 - 16 15,316 - - 15,316 Task 2.1: Utility Coordination 20 4 16 3,268 - 3,268 Task 2.2: Right-of-Way Certification 10 2 4 4 1,346 - 1,346 Task 2.3: RFA ROW 20 2 8 10 2,484 - 2,484 Task 2.4: Meetings During Right of Way 50 16 32 2 8,218 - 8,218 Task 3: Request for Authorization for Construction Package 26 2 8 16 2,994 - - 2,994 Task 3.1: Cost and Scope Changes 50 10 20 20 6,730 - - 6,730 Task 3.2: Federal Aid Management 14 2 6 6 1,830 - - 1,830 Task 4: Bid/Award Assistance and Award Package 19 1 8 2 8 2,439 - - 2,439 Task 5: Federal Reimbursement Requests 130 10 60 60 16,410 - - 16,410 Task 6: Final Report of Expenditures Package 26 2 8 16 2,994 - - 2,994 Task 7: Assist with Consultant Selection 28 - 14 2 12 3,532 - - 3,532 Task 7.1: Finalize RFP 10 4 2 4 1,282 - 1,282 Task 7.2: Consultant Selection Process 4 4 628 - 628 Task 7.3: Caltrans Consultant Financial Review 8 4 4 968 - 968 Task 7.4: Prepare 10-C 6 2 4 654 - 654 Task 8: Construction Support 235 68 122 - 45 35,831 5,000 - 40,831 Other Direct Costs (postage and reprographics)- - - 750 750 PROJECT TOTAL (Including Optional Task)654 121 312 6 215 91,070 5,000 750 96,820 Task Pricing TotalsNAI Labor Labor Compliance Other Direct CostEn g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
(L
o
r
i
s
s
a
G
r
u
e
h
l
,
P
.
E
.
)
Updated Fee Schedule - July 01, 2025 Labor Plan Project Fee including Reim.
Bill Rate > 189.00 157.00 85.00
Current Contract Amount
157.00
Assist with federal compliance for the congestion migitation along Ramon Road and sand fence intallation along Ramon Road and Dinah Shore Drive Change Order 1 Amount
QA
/
Q
C
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
(J
o
s
h
N
i
c
k
e
r
s
o
n
,
P
E
)
As
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
(E
r
i
k
a
S
i
n
o
h
u
i
z
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
(S
t
e
p
h
a
n
i
e
M
i
l
e
t
t
e
)
Fee
Total
Labor
[14]
~~~!
I
114
CONTRACT SUMMARY
FROM: Stephan Longoria P.E., City Engineer
DATE: September 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorization to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. to prepare a Preventative Bridge Maintenace Program ____________________________________________________________________
Background:
In early 2025, the City initiated a solicitation for engineering services to develop a Preventative Bridge Maintenance Program. This effort supports the City’s participation in the federally mandated Bridge Inspection Program, which aims to establish a comprehensive inventory of bridges, assist local agencies with ongoing bridge management, and identify any structural or safety concerns.
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) maintains the statewide master bridge inventory and conducts inspections of federal bridges every two years. These inspections evaluate the overall condition of each structure, provide maintenance recommendations, and assess the integrity of seismic safety features.
Currently, the City has eight bridges included in the federal inventory, three of which are jointly owned with the City of Palm Desert. Palm Desert has engaged Dokken Engineering to prepare a Preventative Bridge Maintenance Plan that includes two of the jointly owned bridges. The City has complete inspection reports for all eight federal inventory bridges. In addition to the federally inventoried structures, the City maintains six non-federal bridges.
These include four public pedestrian/golf cart bridges, one public concrete crossing on Desert Drive, and a low water crossing located on Frank Sinatra Drive.
The proposed agreement will provide inspections of both federal and non-federal bridges.
These inspections will assess current conditions, identify necessary maintenance or repairs, estimate associated costs, and propose an implementation timeline. The consultant will also incorporate previous inspection data, conduct updated assessments, and develop a prioritized maintenance plan to guide future capital improvements.
115
Discussion:
Staff has reviewed and evaluated proposals from three consulting firms and confirmed that each meets the required scope of work. Based on this review, the selected consultant provides the best overall value in addressing the City’s bridge maintenance needs. The inspection phase represents a critical first step in ensuring the long-term safety and functionality of the City’s bridge infrastructure.
Fiscal Impact:
Staff is requesting authorization to enter into a Professional Service Agreement in an amount not to exceed $41,000.00. Funds are available in 224 (Gas Tax) and/or 236 (Measure A) for this expenditure.
Attachments:
1. Consultant Proposal
116
Civil and Structural Engineers
11870 Pierce Street, Suite 265, Riverside, CA 92505
Phone: (951) 687-1005 / Fax: (951) 667-3387 / Web: www.cnseng.com
August 8, 2025
Mr. Stephan Longoria
City Engineer
City of Rancho Mirage Public Works
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Subject: Proposal to Prepare a Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) Bridge List (previously known as BPMP Plan)
Dear Mr. Longoria,
For your consideration, CNS Engineers (CNS) is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Rancho Mirage to prepare a bridge maintenance list for the six (6) local vehicular bridges and six (6) pedestrian/golf cart bridges owned by the City. The cost proposal, scope of work, and estimated schedule are attached. Please do not hesitate to contact me by phone at Office (951) 687-1005 Ext. 104, Cell (949) 690-0089 or by email at [email protected] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
James J. Lu, P.E., S.E.
Structures Manager / Principal
CNS Engineers, Inc.
Attachments:
cost proposal, scope of work, and estimated schedule
,.,» " fcf Nf sf Engineersli"
117
Consultant:
Project Name:
Contract No. Date: 8/8/2025
DIRECT LABOR
Hours Loaded Billing Rate Total
17 $313.00 5,321.00$
32 $241.00 7,712.00$
120 $174.00 20,880.00$
48 $131.00 6,288.00$
0 $0.00 -$
0 $0.00 -$
LABOR COSTS
40,201.00$
OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC)
(ODC is actual cost to be reimbursed with supporting documentation.) Reproduction -$
Travel/Mileage Expense (Mileage will be IRS standard rate.)500.00$ Mailing/Overnight/Special Deliveries -$
Miscellaneous Expense 200.00$
700.00$
SUBCONSULTANT COSTS
-$
None -$
-$
TOTAL COST
TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS
TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT COSTS
40,901.00$
TOTAL LOADED DIRECT LABOR COSTS
Classification/Title Name
James J. Lu
City of Rancho Mirage
Cost Proposal
CNS Engineers, Inc.
Preparation of a BPMP Bridge List
Structures Manager
Senior Bridge Engineer
Project Engineer
Bridge Design Engineer II
118
Project Name:Date: 8/8/25
Consultant: CNS Engineers, Inc.
Task No. Task Description Structures
Manager
Senior Bridge
Engineer
Project
Engineer
Bridge Design
Engineer II
Total
Hours Labor Cost Subtotal Labor
Cost
Rate Schedule $313.00 $241.00 $174.00 $131.00
1.0 Project Administration and Coordination 8 8 8 24 5,824.00$ 5,824.00$
2.0 Collect Data & Conduct Field Review 2 8 32 24 66 11,266.00$ 11,266.00$
3.0 Identify and Reconcile Work
Recommendations 3 8 56 12 79 14,183.00$ 14,183.00$
4.0 Preparation of a BPMP Bridge List 4 8 24 12 48 8,928.00$ 8,928.00$ 0 -$ -$
17 32 120 48 217 40,201.00$
700.00$
40,901.00$
Total Cost
w/ ODC
City of Rancho Mirage
Cost Proposal - Man Hour Worksheet
Preparation of a BPMP Bridge List
Total Hours Total Labor
Cost
Subtotal
ODC
119
1 | P a g e
Preparing a Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) Bridge List (previously known as BPMP Plan)
City of Rancho Mirage
Scope of Services
August 8, 2025
Project Description
The City of Rancho Mirage owns six (6) bridges that carry public traffic on local roads. The bridges that have a State Bridge Number are listed below:
These bridges have been inspected biennially by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Structures Maintenance & Investigations (SM&I) Division per Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). SM&I prepares Bridge Inspection Reports (BIR’s) that summarize various structural conditions, element ratings, and maintenance recommendations. The BIR’s are forwarded to the City for filing and taking as-needed maintenance actions from time to time. The maintenance recommendations are to be implemented by the city using local or federal funds such as the Federal Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) Funds administrated by Caltrans Local Assistance. If the federal BPMP funds requiring a 20% local match are pursued, it requires programming and authorization through Caltrans, which is subject to funding availability and obligation in various fiscal years. Bridge Maintenances and BPMP funds are aimed at extending the service life of the existing structures to ensure the public’s safety without major costly reconstruction.
The following scope is for the first step of bridge maintenance actions, which in general involves technical review and reconciling of as-built data (plans and inspection/maintenance records); conducting a field review; identifying the required rehabilitation work; preparing construction cost estimates; and preparing a bridge maintenance “Bridge List” (previously known as BPMP Plan).
The City will review the bridge maintenance “Bridge List” and determines if federal funds are to be pursued for future phases of engineering design, environmental clearance, and construction.
In addition to the six vehicular bridges, the City owns six (6) pedestrian/golf cart bridges that have not been inspected by Caltrans SM&I. Those six non-vehicular bridges will be reviewed as part of this scope.
1.0 Project Administration and Coordination
The Consultant shall conduct project administration to ensure timely progress reporting, billing, accurate project record keeping, monitoring of costs, progress, deliverables and adherence to quality standards. This task shall include general management and coordination with the City and Caltrans (as directed by the City). Virtual project meetings shall be conducted to maintain good project communication in purposeful and concise meetings.
Bri dge
Number Name Facility Carried
56C0068 WHITEWATER RIVER BOB HOPE DRIVE
56C0495 WHITEWATER RIVER COUNTRY CLUB DR IVE
56C0502 RANCHO MIRAGE CHANNE L PALM CANYON DR IV E
56C0503 WEST RANC HO MIR AGE CHANNEL PALM CANYON DR IV E 56C0504 THUNDERBIRD CHANNE L PALM CANYON DR IV E
56C0573 DINAH SHORE UNDERCROSSING DINA H SHORE DR IVE
120
2 | P a g e
Deliverables: progress reports, schedule updates, document logs, invoices, and meeting minutes
2.0 Collect Data & Conduct Field Review
The Consultant shall identify all bridges and collect as-built plans and maintenance records within the City of Rancho Mirage using Caltrans Bridge Inspection Records Information System (BIRIS) and the City’s Road/Bridge maintenance database.
The Consultant shall screen check all bridge data and conduct a field review to verify that the existing site conditions are consistent with the bridge maintenance records. Findings observed in the field inconsistent with the maintenance records shall be documented. Photographs showing structural or geometric deficiencies and views required for programming documents shall be taken and compiled into a photo log. The field review is not intended to rate the existing bridges as the bridges have been biennial inspected and structurally rated by Caltrans SM&I.
However, the Consultant shall verify ratings are appropriate and coordinate with Caltrans SM&I to seek clarification for the ratings in question.
Deliverables: a field review summary memorandum including notes and photos, a scalable bridge database or a bridge asset management system that provides access to site locations, as-built plans, and inspection records.
3.0 Identify and Reconcile Work Recommendations
The Consultant shall review the bridge inspection reports, as-built plans, and compare them with the results of the field review to identify the structural deficiencies, assess, and compile work recommendations based on the latest Caltrans Local Assistance Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) Guidelines.
The consultant shall develop a bridge inventory that summarizes the bridge conditions, the structural deficiencies, and the recommended Preventative Maintenance and Routine Maintenance works for the City’s review and concurrence. Caltrans standard pay items for the required preventative maintenance work per Caltrans Standard Specifications and Special Provisions shall be identified, and the associated quantities shall be calculated to estimate probable construction costs with a proper contingency.
The conditions of the pedestrian/golf cart bridge will be visually inspected, qualitatively and structurally evaluated in accordance with the as-built data provided by the city.
Most of the BPMP-qualified bridges in the City require the following preventive maintenance work:
• Clean and seal the concrete deck (cracks) with methacrylate resin or a polyester concrete overlay.
• Replace expansion joint seals.
• Construct expansion dams.
• Repair concrete spalls on the deck or at abutment expansion joints. • Repair damaged girder spalls.
• Repair column/pier wall spalls or cracks.
• Replace aged and displaced girder bearings.
• Painting.
Deliverables: quantities and cost estimates for qualified preventative maintenance work
121
3 | P a g e
4.0 Preparation of a BPMP Bridge List
The Consultant shall prepare a BPMP Bridge List (previously known as BPMP Plan) in accordance with Caltrans Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) and Local Assistance Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) Guidelines for the qualified work recommendations. All relevant bridge data, work recommendations and probable project costs shall be compiled into the Caltrans BPMP Standard Spreadsheet. It is expected that one BPMP Bridge List shall be prepared for all bridges requiring preventative maintenance work. The BPMP Bridge List shall include an implementation spreadsheet per Caltrans Standards. The City will review the bridge maintenance Bridge List and determine if the Federal BPMP funds will be pursued for future phases of engineering design, environmental clearance, and construction.
Any rehabilitation work recommendations for the six non-vehicular bridges are expected to be implemented by local funds.
Deliverables: a BPMP (Bridge Maintenance) Bridge List with work items and cost estimates per Caltrans Standards
122
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 2 Notice to Proceed 0 days Mon 9/8/25 Mon 9/8/25
3 1.0 Project Administration and Coordination 79 days Mon 9/8/25 Tue 12/30/25 4 Attend a Kickoff Meeting 1 day Mon 9/15/25 Mon 9/15/25 5 Project Administration and Coordination including
attending progress meetings
79 days Mon 9/8/25 Tue 12/30/25
6 2.0 Collect Data & Conduct Field Review 24 days Mon 9/8/25 Thu 10/9/25 7 Collect and Review Existing Data 10 days Mon 9/8/25 Fri 9/19/25 8 Conduct Field Review 4 days Mon 9/22/25 Thu 9/25/25
9 Prepare and Submit a Field Review Memorandum
and a Scalable Bridge Asset Management System
10 days Fri 9/26/25 Thu 10/9/25
10 3.0 Identify and Reconcile Work Recommendations25 days Fri 10/10/25 Thu 11/13/25 11 Identify and Reconcile Work Recommendations 15 days Fri 10/10/25 Thu 10/30/25 12 Identify Pay Items, Calculate Quantities and
Prepare Cost Estimates
10 days Fri 10/31/25 Thu 11/13/25
13 4.0 Preparation of a BPMP Plan 30 days Fri 11/14/25 Tue 12/30/25 14 Prepare and Submit a Draft BPMP Funding
Spreadsheet to City
10 days Fri 11/14/25 Mon 12/1/25
15 City Reviews BPMP Plan 15 days Tue 12/2/25 Mon 12/22/25 16 Prepare and Submit a Final BPMP Plan
Spreadsheet to Caltrans (as directed by the City)
5 days Tue 12/23/25 Tue 12/30/25
17 Complete Phase I Contract 0 days Tue 12/30/25 Tue 12/30/25 9/8
9/15
9/8 12/30
9/8 9/19
9/22 9/25
9/26 10/9
10/10 10/30
10/31 11/13
11/14 12/1
12/2 12/22
12/23 12/30
12/30
3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 2 Aug '25 Sep '25 Oct '25 Nov '25 Dec '25 Jan '26
Schedule - Preparation of a Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program Plan City of Rancho Mirage
I I i' I I I 1
1 I I I I
1 1 I I I i' I I I I
1 1 I I
I
♦~ I
I
I
I
I
I I
I~
I
~ I
---
I
I I
I I --I
I
-------
I
I I -
♦
123
CONTRACT SUMMARY
FROM: Ryan Stendell, Assistant City Manager
DATE: September 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Approval of an amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with NV5 Inc. in an amount not to exceed $20,000 to provide contracted City Engineering / Land Surveyor Services.
____________________________________________________________________
Discussion:
Staff has numerous on-call agreements for functions that we do not have direct expertise or appropriate licensed staff members. NV5 Inc. is a nationwide firm that provides a range of services inclusive of: General Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, Construction Management, Plan Checking, Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning, among others. Currently the majority of NV5’s work relates to parcel maps and lot line adjustments. NV5 Inc. staff are available locally with Land Surveying licensure to sign on behalf of the City for these requests.
Staff is requesting to increase the current contracted amount of $20,000 with NV5 Inc. to an aggregate amount of $65,000. On-call contracts are billed based on services rendered, which can fluctuate year to year based on the volume of development activity within the City.
Fiscal Impact:
Funds are available in 10131000-7806, which will be offset by application fees for private land development projects.
124
CONTRACT SUMMARY
FROM: Ryan Stendell, Assistant City Manager
DATE: September 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Approval of an Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with HR Green Inc. for On-Call Engineering and Plan Review Services ____________________________________________________________________
Background:
HR Green Inc. has contracted with the City since 2021, for On-Call Engineering and Plan Review Services. On-Call contracts are intended to supplement staffing in times of higher than normal development submittals and are used in lieu of hiring additional full time staff. Since the retirement of our City Engineer, HR Green Inc. has been the primary source for plan check services.
Discussion:
Staff is requesting an amendment to this agreement in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for a total contract amount of $120,000. On-call contracts are billed based on actual services rendered, which can fluctuate year to year based on the volume of development activity within the City.
Fiscal Impact:
Funds are available in 10131000-7806 for this expenditure. The fee schedule related to this contract is set up to be offset by fees taken in related to private development projects.
125
CONTRACT SUMMARY
FROM: Hayley Tice, Marketing & Events Specialist
DATE: September 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Jennifer Yount Photography, (Annual Contract)
____________________________________________________________________
Background:
The Marketing Department retains a contracted photographer to cover Rancho Mirage events, styled sessions, council portraits, and safety photo shoots throughout the year.
Images are used across print and digital channels to promote the City.
Fiscal Impact:
$48,500 for FY 25-26
126
City Council Staff Report
Demands
DATE ITEM #
September 4, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR - 5L.
Presented To Presented By
Mayor and City Council Kofi Antobam, Director of Administrative Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the demands as presented.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Demands
127
69-825 Highway 111 | Rancho Mirage | California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
We hereby accept as files checks issued thru August 29, 2025:
City Funds $ 8,467,400.40
ordered paid as stated below.
Date: September 4, 2025 ____________________________
Mayor
DEMANDS\GEN
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:
128
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 07/17/2025 11:42
User: alexanderh
Program ID: apcshdsb
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
8724 07/18/2025 EFT 3318 ALEXANDRIA SANCHEZ 76964 07/16/2025 07182025 124.26 Invoice: 76964 STUDENT LOAN DEBT ASSISTANCE FY 25/26 124.26 10151000 7270 TRAINING/EDUCATION REIMB
CHECK 8724 TOTAL: 124.26
8725 07/18/2025 EFT 333 BECK OIL INC 173399 07/08/2025 07182025 556.53 Invoice: 173399 FUEL PE 7/8/2025
69.73 21800000 7623 VEHICLE FUEL
77.38 10131000 7623 VEHICLE FUEL
93.13 10132000 7623 VEHICLE FUEL
128.67 10141000 7623 VEHICLE FUEL
80.53 10122000 7623 VEHICLE FUEL
107.09 10123000 7623 VEHICLE FUEL
CHECK 8725 TOTAL: 556.53
8726 07/18/2025 EFT 2860 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, 189394201070125 07/01/2025 07182025 38.24 Invoice: 189394201070125 SERVICE PE 7/30/2025 (ACCT# 189394201)
38.24 21500690 7826 INTERNET ACCESS & SERVICE
CHECK 8726 TOTAL: 38.24
8727 07/18/2025 EFT 2742 CJS COOLING TOWER SERVICES 13-3834 06/30/2025 20250201 07182025 59,486.00 Invoice: 13-3834 LIBRARY COOLING TOWER MEDIA REPLACEMENT 59,486.00 24281000 9536 LIBRARY INFRASTRUCTURE
CHECK 8727 TOTAL: 59,486.00
8728 07/18/2025 EFT 433 DESERT PROMOTIONAL & EMBROIDERY L 104879 05/23/2025 07182025 147.90 Invoice: 104879 COPS UNIFORMS 147.90 10141000 7550 CITY-WIDE COPS PROGRAM
CHECK 8728 TOTAL: 147.90
8729 07/18/2025 EFT 2783 DESERT THEATRICALS, LLC DT 26-1000 05/16/2025 20260017 07182025 30,000.00 Invoice: DT 26-1000 FY 2025-2026 SEASON ROYALTIES 30,000.00 10172000 7494 AMPHITHEATER PROGRAMMING CHECK 8729 TOTAL: 30,000.00
8730 07/18/2025 EFT 3024 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH C 3-2025 06/03/2025 07182025 57,432.61 Invoice: 3-2025 PP-GEMT IGT TRNSFR - 3/4 CY 2025 (NPI 1457885089) 57,432.61 21500000 7853 GEMT QUALITY ASSURANCE FEE 129
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 07/17/2025 11:42
User: alexanderh
Program ID: apcshdsb
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING
CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 8730 TOTAL: 57,432.61
8731 07/18/2025 EFT 2970 ERIK W BROCK 34 07/10/2025 07182025 240.00 Invoice: 34 CITY LOGO ANIMATION 240.00 10172000 7827 COMMUNITY PUBLICATIONS
CHECK 8731 TOTAL: 240.00
8732 07/18/2025 EFT 1929 FARMER BROTHERS CO. 70671495 07/11/2025 07182025 86.09 Invoice: 70671495 COFFEE SUPPLIES
86.09 24281000 8000 SUPPLIES
CHECK 8732 TOTAL: 86.09
8733 07/18/2025 EFT 2757 GLENN DEAL 76967 07/15/2025 07182025 152.40 Invoice: 76967 BOOT REIMBURSEMENT FY 25-26 152.40 10131000 8020 UNIFORMS
CHECK 8733 TOTAL: 152.40
8734 07/18/2025 EFT 10 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-401 76966 07/16/2025 07182025 4,408.34 Invoice: 76966 ICMA 401A PE 07/11/25 4,408.34 101 2236 401A DEF COMP - ICMA
CHECK 8734 TOTAL: 4,408.34
8735 07/18/2025 EFT 34 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 76954 07/16/2025 07182025 29,073.08 Invoice: 76954 ICMA 457 PE 07/11/25 29,073.08 101 2235 DEFERRED COMP - ICMA
CHECK 8735 TOTAL: 29,073.08
8736 07/18/2025 EFT 3202 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 8813289 05/25/2025 07182025 11,439.00 Invoice: 8813289 LEGAL SERVICES PE 5/31/2025 11,439.00 10154000 7400 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK 8736 TOTAL: 11,439.00
8737 07/18/2025 EFT 3204 JUAN GUERRA 76942 07/16/2025 07182025 86.04 Invoice: 76942 EXP REIMB - FOOD FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
86.04 10111000 7806 MEETINGS/TRAINING/TRAVEL
CHECK 8737 TOTAL: 86.04
130
City of Rancho Mirage
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 07/17/2025 11:42
User: alexanderh
Program ID: apcshdsb