Redding City Council
January 18, 2022

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (Doors open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA
January 18, 2022
6:00 PM
The City Council Chambers are fully open to the public in compliance with current guidelines from the California Department of Public Health regarding indoor meetings with the requirement of masks to be worn in all indoor public settings, irrespective of vaccine status from December 15, 2021, through February 15, 2022.

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR KRISTEN SCHREDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Jennifer Hall, Christian Science Church C. Roll Call

2. PRESENTATIONS
2A. Mayor’s Certificate declaring January 2022 as National Mentoring Month in the City of Redding, in honor of those who connect and fuel opportunities for young people.
2B. Presentation regarding Visit Redding Tourism Marketing by Danny Orloff of the Greater Redding Chamber of Commerce.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please fill out a blue Speaker Request Form, located in the lighted alcoves at the back of the Council Chambers, and submit it to the City Clerk. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.org or in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council January 18, 2022

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calendar, please fill out a Speaker Request Form and submit it to the City Clerk before the Consent Calendar is considered. It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation. 4(a). Approve Minutes: Special Meeting – Civic Auditorium Workshop No. 3 of November 10, 2021; Regular Meeting of November 16, 2021; and Special Meeting – Closed Session of December 07, 2021.
4(b). Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register Nos. 11 and 12; and Payroll Register Nos. 12 and 13.
4(c). Accept the City of Redding Treasurer’s Report for the month of November 2021.
4(d). Accept the Proof of Cash reconciliation and ACR133 report for the month of November 2021.

4.1(a). Accept report and make a determination by a four-fifths (4/5ths) affirmative vote that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the City of Redding, under Public Contract Code section 22050(c)(1) related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19).

4.1(b). Authorize submission of a grant application through the California Department of Transportation Clean California Local Grant Program for $5,000,000 to support the litter abatement, beautification, safety, and public education efforts of the City of Redding on local streets, roads, pathways, trails, and parks in the Calaboose Creek area of Downtown Redding; and approve sponsorship of The McConnell Foundation grant application for the downtown plaza project to complete construction of a public park pending review of the application by the City Manager.

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS
The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non-agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted a Speaker Request Form to the City Clerk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

Redding City Council January 18, 2022

4.1(c). Adopt Resolution authorizing the submission of applications for all California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) grants for which the City of Redding is eligible through January 18, 2027, including the CalRecycle Senate Bill 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program for an allocated amount of $121,312 to support capacity planning, edible food recovery, and organic waste and edible food recovery education and outreach; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all grant documents necessary to apply for and secure the grant funds and implement the approved grant project(s).

4.1(d). Approve the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with Crosland Barnes Group, for 3.7 acres of City of Redding-owned property located at 5300 Venture Parkway, Stillwater Business Park Parcel 6A (Assessor’s Parcel Number 054-220-028), for fair market value; authorize the Mayor to sign the PSA and other documents needed to complete the sale and transfer of the property; and find the sale of the City-owned property is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15312 (Surplus Government Property Sales).

4.1(f). Adopt Resolution approving the following:
(1) Declaring hangar and ground space property located at Redding Municipal Airport, and described in Exhibit A, as exempt surplus property;
(2) Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to: (1) adhere to reporting and approval guidelines pursuant to the State of California Housing and Community Development Surplus Land Act Guidelines Section 400(e) with regard to negotiating and executing leases with current and future tenants for hangar and/or ground space for aviation related uses; (2) to negotiate the terms of the lease(s) of said property; and (3) execute any documents necessary to execute lease(s) with current and future tenants; (3) Finding the sale and/or lease of the Property by the City is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15312 of the CEQA Guidelines (Surplus Government Property Sales); and
(4) Finding the sale and/or lease of the Property by the City is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (Common Sense Exemption) because the Property has no environmental attributes and, as a result, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the sale or lease of the Property and development of the same for aviation supportive uses will have a significant effect on the environment.

4.2(a). Approve the following relative to the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s (HCD) Homekey Program:
(1) Adopt Resolution authorizing the City of Redding to submit, as a coapplicant with Rolling Oak, LLC, a Homekey Program grant application to HCD in the amount of $10 million to support the purchase of affordability covenants at 1178 Lake Boulevard; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign the grant application and all applicable documents to complete the application process.

Redding City Council January 18, 2022

4.6(a). Approve the following actions relative to Request for Proposals Schedule No. 5254, for Replacement Playground Equipment for Indian Hills, Martin Luther King Jr., Peppertree, Ravenwood, Creekside, and Cumberland Parks. (1) Award to Park Planet for $119,887.70, Kompan for $86,867.43, and Miracle Play Systems for $44,841.53 for a total amount not to exceed $251,596.66;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the agreements, and any amendments, or additional documentation needed to complete the projects; and
(3) Find that these projects are categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301 (a) and (d) – Existing Facilities.

4.9(a). Authorize purchase of three new 2021 Ford Interceptor Utility vehicles and one new Dodge Durango V-6 AWD Pursuit vehicle from National Auto Fleet Group off the Sourcewell master vehicle contract at a total cost of $149,647.64.

4.11(a). Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5221 (Job No. 2644) South Bonnyview Road/I-5 Phase II Improvements Bechelli Lane Roundabout Project (Project):
(1) Award to Tullis Inc. in the amount of $4,089,735;
(2) Approve an additional $400,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; and $700,000 for project development costs; (3) Approve $410,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $100,000;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating an additional $3,150,000 in funding for the project; and
(6) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities and Section 15302(c) – Replacement or Reconstruction.

4.11(b). Authorize the Mayor to execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for member agency participation.

4.11(c). Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) (Schedule No. 5246), Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Magnolia Area Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project (Project):
(1) Award to Ghirardelli Associates, Inc.;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract for a not-to-exceed fee of $833,254.10 with Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. to provide Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Project; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendment increases up to $50,000.

Redding City Council January 18, 2022

4.11(d). Accept update on the City of Redding’s COVID-19 Local Economic Stimulus Package projects.

4.11(e). Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposal Schedule No. 5259, Food, Beverage, and Gift Concession Agreement and Permit for Commercial Activities at the Redding Municipal Airport:
(1) Award to Theory Coffee Roasters; and
(2) Approve and authorize the execution of the agreement for a five-year term effective February 1, 2022, through January 31, 2027, with two oneyear options to unilaterally extend the term.

4.11(f). Accept the improvements in Salt Creek Heights Subdivision – Unit 2, Phase 1 (S-15-07/PD-11-07) as satisfactorily complete; and adopt Resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

5. APPOINTMENTS

5.1. Consider reappointment to the City of Redding Administrative Hearings Board.

Recommendation:

Accept Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint Peter Figura to the Administrative Hearings Board to serve an additional four-year term effective February 1, 2022, and expiring January 31, 2026.

Redding City Council January 18, 2022

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A court challenge to action taken by the City Council on any project or decision may be limited to only those issues raised during the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council during, or prior to, the public hearing.

Development Services

6.1. Continued Public Hearing to consider General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Specific Plan Amendment Applications; and the Resolution and Ordinance associated with the adoption of the proposed Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update.

Recommendation:

Reconvene the public hearing opened at the City Council Meeting of December 7, 2021, and continued on December 21, 2021, and upon conclusion:
(1) Adopt Resolution: (a) adopting the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan; (b) adopting the addendum to the mitigated negative declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map; (c) adopting amendments to Redding’s General Plan (General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449); and (d) amending the City of Redding Schedule of Fees and Service Charges;
(2) Offer Ordinance for first reading by title only and waive the full reading: (a) adopting the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan; (b) adopting the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map; (c) adopting the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update (Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361); (d) approving amendments to Redding Zoning Map (Rezoning Application RZ-2021- 00450); (e) making findings in support of a general plan consistency determination; and direct the City Attorney to prepare a summary ordinance, and authorize the City Clerk to publish the summary ordinance according to law; and
(3) Find that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan and the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map are adequate to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, and the necessary findings for approval are in evidence.

Redding City Council January 18, 2022

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
Council & Council Committees
9A. City Council Liaison Assignments for Calendar Year 2022.

Recommendation:

Information only.
9B. Consider Reports from Independent Auditors for the year ended June 30, 2021.

Recommendation:

Approve the Audit Committee’s recommendation to accept the Statement on Auditing Standards AU-C 260 Letter and the draft copy of the Single Audit Reports for the year ended June 30, 2021.

City Manager

9.1(e). Consider Resolution approving amendments to Executive Management Pay-ForPerformance Salary Plan and Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees.

Recommendation:

Adopt Resolution approving the following:
(1) Amendment to the Executive Management Pay-For-Performance Salary Plan (Unrepresented) providing classification-specific salary range adjustments as a result of a compensation study, including the City Manager and City Attorney classifications, and authorizing immediate salary increases for the employees in those classifications, effective January 23, 2022; and (2) Amendment of the Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees to: (a) eliminate the educational and professional incentives/specialty assignment pay for the Public Safety Management classifications; and (b) increase the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) cost sharing amount by 1.125 percent for Classic CalPERS Miscellaneous Members, effective January 23, 2022, or as soon as administratively feasible.

Finance

9.10(a). Consider acceptance of the City of Redding Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2021.

Recommendation:

Accept the City of Redding Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021.

Redding City Council January 18, 2022

Personnel

9.15(a). Consider Resolution approving addition of a new full-time Personnel Analyst I to the City of Redding Personnel Department.

Recommendation:

Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 24th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $36,010 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and $89,660 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for the addition of a new full-time Personnel Analyst position in the Personnel Department.

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
Information Only

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT
Redding City Council January 18, 2022

Pursuant to the Brown Act, non-confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181, and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: http://scac.cablecast.tv:8080/CablecastPublicSite/watch/4?channel=1. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.org/. Open the City’s meetings and agendas portal; Click on tab named "Meetings Videos" and select Redding City Council under “Available Archives 2021” select the desired date, then click on “video” to view the meeting.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Mayor’s Certificate declaring January 2022 as National Mentoring Month in the City of Redding, in honor of those who connect and fuel opportunities for young people.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 2A
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
SUBJECT: 2A--Mayor’s Certificate declaring January 2022 as National Mentoring Month Packet Pg. 10

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Presentation regarding Visit Redding Tourism Marketing by Danny Orloff of the Greater Redding Chamber of Commerce.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 2B
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
SUBJECT: 2B--Presentation regarding Visit Redding Tourism Marketing by Danny Orloff of the Greater Redding Chamber of Commerce
Packet Pg. 11

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve Minutes: Special Meeting – Civic Auditorium Workshop No. 3 of November 10, 2021; Regular Meeting of November 16, 2021; and Special Meeting – Closed Session of December 07, 2021.

Attachments
Unofficial Minutes - November 10, 2021 - Special Meeting - Civic Auditorium Property Workshop (available online)
Unofficial Minutes - November 16, 2021 - Regular Meeting (available online) Unofficial Minutes - December 07, 2021 - Special Meeting - Closed Session (available online) MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes.

Packet Pg. 12
455
11/10/2021
Unofficial Minutes
Redding City Council, Special Meeting
Civic Auditorium Property Workshop
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
November 10, 2021, 5:15 PM
The City Council Chambers are fully open to the public and in compliance with current guidelines from the California Department of Public Health regarding indoor meetings.

The meeting was called to order by Vice Mayor Kristen Schreder with the following Council Members present: Michael Dacquisto, Mark Mezzano, and Julie Winter. Mayor Erin Resner was absent.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Economic Development, Innovation, and Equity Manager Janelle Galbraith, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, City Clerk Pamela Mize, and Executive Assistant Luisa Klapperich.

City Manager Tippin noted that this is the third of a series of four property workshops. The final workshop on November 18th will be a summarization and Council deliberation.

PRESENTATION REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE CITY OF REDDING-OWNED CIVIC

AUDITORIUM PROPERTIES INCLUSIVE OF COVENANTS, CITY COST BURDENS,

GRANT RESTRICTIONS, ACQUISITION DATES, AND OTHER ITEMS NEEDING

SPECIAL CONSIDERATION
3(a). Report regarding the history of the various uses of the properties, transfers of ownership, current leases, and restrictions.

Deputy City Manager Steve Bade provided a PowerPoint presentation and summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), both incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the council ensued.

Bennett Gooch, president of the Redding Rodeo Association (RRA), outlined the RRA’s past and future activities and their contributions to the community, as well as upgrades needed at the Rodeo Grounds.

Lon McCasland, member of the Redding Rodeo Association, Bruce Alexander, John Dunlap, and Tom Spade, expressed the importance of the Rodeo Grounds to the community.

Jessie Rouse and Lorraine Lindsay spoke regarding the significance of the Riverfront property to the indigenous community.

Ginko Schabarum and Marjy Cantrell opposed selling the Riverfront property.

David Ledger, Shasta Environmental Alliance, disagreed with selling the Riverfront Property and expressed concern for the environment.

Mike Van Bockern voiced opposition toward the McConnell Foundation.

Nick Gardner asked who owns the Sheraton Hotel.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item.

PRESENTATION OF UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL RECEIVED TO MASTER PLAN AND

DEVELOP LAND AROUND THE CIVIC AUDITORIUM
Shannon Phillips, Chief Operating Officer for The McConnell Foundation, along with Michael Lockwood, Principal-in-Charge for Populous, and Allen Knott, CEO of K2 Development, provided a PowerPoint presentation, incorporated herein by reference.

Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - November 10, 2021 - Special Meeting - Civic Auditorium Property Workshop (available online) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 456
11/10/2021
A discussion amongst the council ensued.

Cameron Middleton, Asphalt Cowboys, emphasized the importance of the Rodeo Grounds.

Rebeca Ladrón de Guevara, president of Wintu Audubon Society, spoke in opposition to selling the Riverfront property and advised of the importance of the Riverfront property to the Indigenous community and wildlife.

Allie Figuera commented on the importance of the Rodeo Grounds to the community.

Steve Kohn advised the Council to carefully consider the proposed sale of the Riverfront property.

Johnathan Freeman, Rich Gelardo, Brandy McDaniels, and Senator Maurice Johannessen opposed selling the Riverfront property.

Radley Davis expressed his concern with how the natural habitat will be affected by the Riverfront property development.

Kim Hein suggested that a compromise between all parties for the property’s development be reached.

Corey Hein expressed support for the development of the Riverfront property.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Vice Mayor Schreder declared the meeting adjourned at the hour of 7:56 p.m.

APPROVED:
______________________
Kristen Schreder, Vice Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - November 10, 2021 - Special Meeting - Civic Auditorium Property Workshop (available online) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 459
11/16/2021
Unofficial Minutes
Redding City Council, Regular Meeting
Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
November 16, 2021, 6:00 PM
The City Council Chambers are fully open to the public in compliance with current guidelines from the California Department of Public Health regarding indoor meetings.

The meeting was called to order by Mayor Erin Resner with the following Council Members present: Michael Dacquisto, Mark Mezzano, Kristen Schreder, and Julie Winter.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Sheri DeMaagd, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, City Clerk Pamela Mize, and Executive Assistant Luisa Klapperich.

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Resner.

The Invocation was provided by Pastor Dayton Phillips, Hope Baptist Church.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Alex Bielecki spoke regarding government and the pandemic.

Steve Kohn and Nick Gardner opposed selling the Civic Auditorium Riverfront property.

CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar and each Report to City Council (staff report) is incorporated herein by reference:
4(b). Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register No. 8; and Payroll Register No. 8. (1) Accounts Payable Register No. 8 for the period of October 9, 2021, through October 29, 2021, for a total of $15,256,121.42 for check numbers 166268 through 166749, inclusive, ACH Transfer numbers 17606 through 17691 inclusive, Wire Transfer numbers 11011 through 11051, inclusive; and (2) Payroll Register No. 8 for the period of October 3, 2021 through October 16, 2021, in the amount of $3,601,438.10 for electronic deposit transaction numbers 544856 through 545774, inclusive, and check numbers 607378 through 607430, inclusive; SUMMARY TOTAL: $18,857,559.52.

4.1(a). Accept report and make a determination by a four-fifths (4/5ths) affirmative vote that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the City of Redding, under Public Contract Code section 22050(c)(1) related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19).

4.5(a). Approve setting a Public Hearing on December 7, 2021, at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California, to consider a change in rates (two percent rate increases per year) for Redding Electric Utility (REU) effective with the January 2022 and January 2023 billing cycles, the establishment of a Residential MultiFamily rate class, and an increase in the benefit of REU’s Residential Energy Discount for income-qualified households.

4.5(b). Approve issuance of Request for Proposals for software necessary to implement Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) Distribution Risk Management Plan (Goal Four of REU’s 2026 Strategic Plan) to help track, manage, and monitor workflow and performance in the most cost effective and efficient manner.

Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - November 16, 2021 - Regular Meeting (available online) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 460
11/16/2021

4.6(b). Authorize the following relative to the Shasta Youth Outdoor Leadership Program, to be funded by the Youth Community Access Grant Program and based at the Martin Luther King Jr. Center: (1) adopt Resolution 2021-128, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, authorizing the City of Redding as an applicant for the Youth Community Access Grant Program, administered by the California Department of Parks and Recreation in the amount of $56,970; and (2) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, appropriate funds should the grant be awarded, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project.

4.7(a). Authorize the following related to the City of Redding’s agreements with Tyler Technologies, Inc. (C-5203 & C-5204): (1) authorize the City Treasurer to open a merchant bank account with Tyler Payments through Chase Bank to accept payments with the existing Integrated Land Management System (ILMS) for the Development Services Department; and (2) adopt Resolution 2021-129, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, designating signers for various demand accounts held by US Bank.

4.11(a).Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5228 (Job No. 2660) California Alley Utility Improvement Project: (1) award to Jason Abel Construction in the amount of $1,621,355; (2) approve an additional $175,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; and $290,000 for project development costs; (3) approve $245,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $100,000; and (5) find that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15302(c) – Replacement or Reconstruction.

4.11(b).Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposal (RFP) Schedule No. 5209 at the Redding Municipal Airport: (1) award three Rental Car Concession Agreements and Permit for Commercial Activities to: (a) Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC DBA AVIS; (b) Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC DBA BUDGET; and (c) SJ Denham, Inc. DBA HERTZ; (2) approve the agreements for a five-year term effective December 1, 2021, through November 30, 2026; and (3) authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements.

4.11(c).Accept an update on the City of Redding’s COVID-19 Local Economic Stimulus Package projects.

4.11(d).Authorize the following actions relative to State of California Department of Transportation funding: (1) accept grant funds awarded to the City of Redding for the Systemic Left Turn Protection Project and the Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project; and (2) adopt Resolution 2021-130, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 17th Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $1,921,510 for said projects.

4.11(e).Authorize and approve the following actions regarding acceptance of Active Transportation Program (ATP) funds for the following: (1) accept ATP funds in the amount of $2,665,000 for the Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project; (2) accept ATP funds in the amount of $7,822,000, and Highway Infrastructure Program funds in the amount of $1,448,780, for the Victor Avenue and Cypress Avenue Active Transportation Project; and (3) adopt Resolution 2021-131, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 18th Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $11,935,780 for the two projects.

4.11(f).Award Bid Schedule No. 5240 for the purchase of one Organics Refuse Collection Truck to Dobbs Truck Group for a total delivered cost not to exceed $370,863.31, for the City of Redding Solid Waste Utility.

4.11(g).Authorize staff to develop a Request for Proposal for the design of infrastructure improvements for the Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 Project; and adopt Resolution 2021- 132, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 19th Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $1,500,000 for said purpose.

Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - November 16, 2021 - Regular Meeting (available online) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 461
11/16/2021

4.14(a).Adopt Resolution 2021-133, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, authorizing the City of Redding to participate in the settlement of the nationwide opioid litigation, delegate authority to the City Attorney to execute all documents necessary to accomplish settlement on behalf of the City of Redding, and authorize the City Attorney to notify the national settlement administrator of the City of Redding’s intent to receive a direct distribution of settlement funds.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Schreder, seconded by Council Member Mezzano, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be accepted, acknowledged, adopted, approved, and/or authorized as recommended.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members - Dacquisto, Mezzano, Schreder, Winter, and Resner NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
Resolution Nos. 2021-128 through 2021-133 are on file with the Office of the City Clerk.

PUBLIC HEARING(S)

6.1. Public Hearing to consider Resolution to add Electric Vehicle Charging and Parking Fees to City of Redding's Schedule of Fees and Service Charges.

Electric Utility Finance Manager Joe Bowers provided a PowerPoint presentation and summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), both incorporated herein by reference.

The hour of 6:25 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Resner opened the Public Hearing.

The Affidavit of Publication – Notice of Public Hearing is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Mayor Resner determined that no one present wished to address this matter and closed the Public Hearing.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Mezzano, to adopt Resolution 2021-134, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending the City of Redding’s Schedule of Fees and Service Charges by adding the Direct Current (DC) Fast Charging – Public Fee, for City of Redding-owned DC Fast Chargers (level three).

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members - Dacquisto, Mezzano, Schreder, Winter, and Resner NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 2021-134 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

6.2. Public Hearing to consider Resolution to adopt the 2020 City of Redding Water Shortage Contingency Plan.

Assistant Director of Public Works Ryan Bailey summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

The hour of 6:33 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Resner opened the Public Hearing.

The Affidavit of Publication – Notice of Public Hearing is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Mayor Resner determined that no one present wished to address this matter and closed the Public Hearing.

Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - November 16, 2021 - Regular Meeting (available online) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 462
11/16/2021
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Schreder, seconded by Council Member Winter, to authorize and approve the following actions relative to the 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan: (1) determine that adoption of the 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the common sense exemption (14 CCR 15061(b)(3)), as implementation of the Water Shortage Response Actions would not impact environmental resources and would instead protect critical water resources; (2) adopt Resolution 2021-135, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, adopting the City of Redding 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan, pursuant to California Water Code section 10632; (3) direct staff to file the 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan with the California Department of Water Resources and the California State Library within thirty days of adoption; (4) direct staff to make the final Water Shortage Contingency Plan available for public review within thirty days after filing a copy with the California Department of Water Resources; and (5) direct staff to submit the final 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan in electronic format to Shasta County within thirty days of adoption.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members - Dacquisto, Mezzano, Schreder, Winter, and Resner NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 2021-135 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

6.3. Public Hearing to consider Resolution to amend the City of Redding Urban Water Management Plan.

Assistant Director of Public Works Bailey summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

The hour of 6:34 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Resner opened the Public Hearing.

The Affidavit of Publication – Notice of Public Hearing is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Mayor Resner determined that no one present wished to address this matter and closed the Public Hearing.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Schreder, to authorize and approve the following actions relative to the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan: (1) determine that adoption of the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan Update is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the common sense exemption (14 CCR 15061(b)(3)), as the mandated plan update would not result in physical alteration of the environment and implementation of any future action would require independent evaluation under CEQA; (2) adopt Resolution 2021-136, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, to amend the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan as required by the State of California Department of Water Resources pursuant to Assembly Bill 797, the “Urban Water Management Planning Act,” amending Division 6, Part 2.6, of the California Water Code; (3) pursuant to Water Code section 10644, direct staff to file the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan Update with the California Department of Water Resources and the California State Library within thirty days of adoption; (4) pursuant to Water Code section 10645, direct staff to make the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan Update available for public review within thirty days after filing a copy with the California Department of Water Resources; and (5) pursuant to Water Code section 10644, direct staff to submit the final 2020 Urban Water Management Plan Update in electronic format to Shasta County within thirty days of adoption.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members - Dacquisto, Mezzano, Schreder, Winter, and Resner NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 2021-136 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - November 16, 2021 - Regular Meeting (available online) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 463
11/16/2021
REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

9.3(a). Request for Proposals for a new Enterprise Resource Planning System (ERP) for the City of Redding as recommended by the Consultant, BerryDunn, McNeil & Parker LLC (BerryDunn).

Chief Information Officer Anthony Van Boekel, David Ledbetter, Jr., Project Manager for BerryDunn, and Finance Officer Greg Robinett provided a PowerPoint presentation and summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), both incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the council members ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Mezzano, to authorize the following actions pursuant to the recommendation of Professional Services Consultant BerryDunn: (1) approve issuance of a Request for Proposals for a new ERP system to include critical functions that will focus around core business functions related to financial management, procurement, document management, human resources, time, attendance, and payroll; and (2) adopt Resolution 2021-137, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting 20th Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $4,100,000 to fund an ERP system.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members - Dacquisto, Mezzano, Schreder, Winter, and Resner NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
Resolution No. 2021-137 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

9.5(c). Redding Electric Utility's Quarterly Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

Electric Utility Finance Manager Bowers provided a PowerPoint presentation and summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), both incorporated herein by reference.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Schreder, seconded by Council Member Dacquisto, to accept Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 First Quarter Financial Report and Industry Activities Update. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes

9.6(a). This Item, regarding amendment(s) to lease (C-5682) with Advance Redding for the Redding Civic Auditorium, was removed from the agenda at the request of the Community Services Director.

9.6(c). Oral report presenting options for planning City of Redding's South City Park enhancements.

Community Services Director Kim Niemer and Les Melburg, Principal Architect for Nichols, Melburg & Rossetto, provided a PowerPoint presentation and summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), both incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the council members ensued.

Ericka Jones, President of the Library Foundation, Daniel Miller, Joe Bull, and Marcus Partin were supportive of the development of South City Park.

Clayton emphasized the importance of safety in the area of South City Park.

Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - November 16, 2021 - Regular Meeting (available online) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 464
11/16/2021
BY CONSENSUS, the Council accepted the oral report and directed staff and the Community Services Advisory Commission (CSAC) to continue to engage the community in dialog regarding options to enhance South City Park through workshops, surveys, etc. and to collaborate with the Redding Colt 45s organization.

9.10(a).City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended September 2021.

Finance Officer Robinett provided a PowerPoint presentation and summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), both incorporated herein by reference.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Schreder, seconded by Council Member Dacquisto, to accept the General Fund Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2021. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes

9.15(a).Adoption of uncodified Ordinance No. 2645 amending the City of Redding's contract (C99) with the California Public Employees' Retirement System to allow Unrepresented Public Safety Management employees to share additional costs of the retirement benefit.

Assistant City Manager DeMaagd summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Schreder, seconded by Council Member Mezzano, to adopt Ordinance No. 2645, an uncodified ordinance of the City Council authorizing an amendment to the contract (C-99) between the City Council of the City of Redding and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System as allowed in Section 20516 of the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (Employees Sharing Additional Cost) for Unrepresented Public Safety Management employees.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members - Dacquisto, Mezzano, Schreder, Winter, and Resner NOES: Council Members - None
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ABSENT: Council Members - None
Ordinance No. 2645 is on file with the Office of the City Clerk.

SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS FOR

FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
At Council Member Mezzano’s suggestion, a consensus of the Council directed staff to request a status update from the Chamber of Commerce on the tourism contract for presentation at a future Council meeting.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, at the hour of 8:09 p.m. Mayor Resner declared the meeting adjourned.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Erin D. Resner, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - November 16, 2021 - Regular Meeting (available online) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 468
12/07/2021
Unofficial Minutes
Redding City Council, Special Meeting
Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
December 7, 2021, 5:15 PM
The City Council Chambers are fully open to the public in compliance with current guidelines from the California Department of Public Health regarding indoor meetings.

The meeting was called to order by Mayor Erin Resner with the following Council Members present: Michael Dacquisto, Mark Mezzano, Kristen Schreder, and Julie Winter.

Also present were: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Sheri DeMaagd, City Attorney Barry DeWalt, and Executive Assistant Luisa Klapperich called the roll prior to leaving the Closed Session meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Resner determined that no one present wished to address the items agendized for Closed Session.

CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 5:17 p.m., Mayor Resner opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.
3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Designated Agency Representative: Assistant City Manager/Personnel Director DeMaagd
Employee Organization: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFL-CIO – Electric Employees
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor Resner declared the meeting adjourned at the hour of 5:42 p.m.

APPROVED:
_______________________________
Erin D. Resner, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Unofficial Minutes - December 07, 2021 - Special Meeting - Closed Session (available online) (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register Nos. 11 and 12; and Payroll Register Nos. 12 and 13.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the registers.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the registers and provide direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
Attached are the Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers as follows:

Accounts Payable:
(1) Register Number 11 for the period December 1, 2021 – December 10, 2021 in the amount of $4,825,084.27 and Register Number 12 for the period December 11, 2021 – December 30, 2021 in the amount of $12,822,068.84.

Payroll:
(1) Register Number 12 for the period November 28, 2021 – December 11, 2021, in the amount of $4,649,106.37 and Register Number 13 for the period December 12, 2021 – December 25, 2021 in the amount of $3,657,496.20.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)--City of Redding Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers.

Allyn Feci Clark, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 22
Report to Redding City Council January 10, 2022
Re: 4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers Page 2 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online)
Packet Pg. 23
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Accounts Payable Register No. 11 & No. 12 and Payroll Register No. 12 & No. 13 (available online) (4(b)--Accounts Payable and

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the City of Redding Treasurer’s Report for the month of November 2021.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the report.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the report and provide direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
Attached is the Treasurer’s Report for the month ended November 30, 2021, the November 2021 Portfolio Management Report, and a summary of the City of Redding’s (City) portfolio. For comparative purposes, prior month information is also reported.

The City’s portfolio meets the requirements of Investment Policy No. 408. Market values for securities are obtained from US Bank Institutional Trust and Custody Department. The Treasurer’s accountability total may be measured against the Finance Department ACR 133 cash reconciliation report for November 2021.

The effective monthly rate of return for City Treasurer-managed funds during November 2021 was 0.58 percent, a loss of three basis points from October 2021. The Fiscal Year 2021-22 rate of return was 0.62 percent, a loss of three basis points from October’s year-to-date rate of return. A basis point equals one one-hundredth of one percent, or 0.01 percent.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(c)--City of Redding Treasurer's Report for November 2021.

Abby Schanuth, Deputy City
Treasurer
Packet Pg. 77
Report to Redding City Council January 10, 2022
Re: 4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021 Page 2
Investment activity in the portfolio during November included the purchases of two Federal Agency Coupons for a total of $5,000,000. There were no maturities, or calls. Adjustments in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the money market accounts were made to accommodate cash flow.

Treasurer’s Accountability changed from $284,363,018 to $281,933,188 which constitutes a decrease of $2,429,830. In addition to the investment purchases, the City had notable expenditures of $1,690,371 to Siemens Energy for the 3rd quarter variable and $762,647 of capital outlay for the improvements to the Aquatic Center.

The City Treasurer respectfully recommends the City Council accept the attached Treasurer’s Report for November 2021 noting a Total Treasurer’s Accountability of $281,933,188 and an organizational total of $303,144,632 which includes assets held by the City of Redding as Successor Agency to the Redding Redevelopment Agency, as well as Entity and Trustee accounts.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online)
Packet Pg. 78
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021) Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Treasurer's Report November 2021 (available online) (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - November 2021)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the Proof of Cash reconciliation and ACR133 report for the month of November 2021.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the report.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the Proof of Cash reconciliation and ACR133 report and provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The City Council has requested a monthly report on pooled cash. The ACR133 report summarizes, by fund, the month-to-date pooled cash balances and transactions. The Proof of Cash reconciles the ACR133 report to the Treasurer’s monthly report.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
ACR133, Current Cash Balance
Proof of Cash
MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(d)--ACR133 Report and Cash Reconciliation for the Month of November 2021.

Allyn Feci Clark, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 100
ACR133 CITY OF REDDING KINGSSYS 12:04:10 12/07/2021
GENERAL ACCOUNTING DATED 12/07/2021
CURRENT CASH BALANCE - CITY COUNCIL REPORT PAGE 1

ENDINGBALANCE
11/30/2021
111 GENERAL FUND 10,972,457.60120 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 51,163.76121 ENT ANDERSON GROUNDWATER 177,346.42-122 PARKING FUND 727,487.12123 GENERAL SPECIAL REVENUE 126,013.59124 IPSS SPECIAL REVENUE 1,810,971.08125 ROLLING STOCK REPLACEMNT 11,314,538.91126 SPECL GAS TAX ST IMPROVE 6,521,585.18127 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 4,335,686.95128 DEVELOPMENT FUND 4,557,912.72129 LIBRARY 138,600.25130 BRANCH LIBRARIES 43,772.40134 MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FUND 2,026,887.46-140 TOURISM/CONVENTION FUND 131,851.59-142 ELECTRIC UTILITY FUND 72,756,541.01143 WATER UTILITY FUND 55,377,061.76145 WASTEWATER UTILITY FUND 42,172,223.01147 STORM DRAIN UTILITY FUND 5,104,760.11148 WEST CENTRAL LANDFILL 11,717,711.61149 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION 13,749,126.49150 MEDIA, COMMS & PR 40,074.87151 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,718,834.79153 FLEET MAINTENANCE 49,224.80154 BUILDING MAINT & CONSTR 869,301.07158 RECORDS MANAGEMENT 158,279.73160 EMPLOYER SERVICES 182,754.85162 RMU ADMINISTRATION 1,364,444.01165 GEOGRAPHIC INFO SERVICES 554,962.07166 COMMUNICATIONS 320,675.92168 REPROGRAPHICS 133,200.12169 VOLUNTEER SERVICES 15,795.46171 SPECIAL DEPOSITS FUND 19,028,120.47172 RISK MANAGEMENT 9,420,098.59173 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS P/R 1,780,516.11174 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT GRP INS 564,480.74175 GASB 45 TRUST FUND 39,108.46178 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 1,357,908.29191 CD BLOCK GRANT FUND 1,436,951.15193 HOUSING AUTHORITY 95,746.57-194 REDDING REDEVELOPMENT 81,336.16200 REDDING AREA BUS AUTHOR. 128,932.38-230 LOW/MOD INC HOUS ASSET 944,189.10300 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIST. 311,549.14400 LANDSCAPE DISTRICTS 48,540.00 FINAL TOTAL 279,337,195.03
ACR133 12:04:10 12/07/2021
Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: ACR133, Current Cash Balance (4(d)--ACR133 Report and Cash Reconciliation - November Sheet "D" November 2021

CITY OF REDDING

PROOF OF CASH
RECONCILIATION BETWEEN TREASURER'S REPORT AND ACR 133
As of November 2021
ACR133 TREASURER
END OF MONTH BALANCE 279,337,195.03 281,933,187.54
LESS OUTSIDE MANAGED FUNDS (238.72)
ACR133 Report
CASH ACCOUNTS NOT ON ACR133
LIBRARY MERCHANT DEPOSIT 100.00

BAD CHECKS -
PAYROLL TIMING DIFFERENCE 3,260,744.92
BANK CHARGES (90,718.23)

WIRE TRANSFER TIMING DIFFERENCE
OTHER ADJUSTMENTS (993,476.67)
BANK DR/CR (419,303.77)
TOTALS 281,513,745.05 281,513,745.05
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Proof of Cash (4(d)--ACR133 Report and Cash Reconciliation - November 2021)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept report and make a determination by a four-fifths (4/5ths) affirmative vote that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the City of Redding, under Public Contract Code section 22050(c)(1) related to the Coronavirus (COVID-19).

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact related to this action.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not confirm that conditions of local emergency continue to exist. Under Public Contract Code section 22050(c)(1) the local emergency can only be terminated by a vote of four-fifths of the City Council. To that end, the City Council’s prior determination of a local emergency will remain unless an affirmative vote of the City Council is made to terminate the local emergency.

Background/Analysis
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a wide spread global virus. The first case of COVID-19 in the United States was reported on January 21, 2020. As the number of cases continues to grow rapidly across the country, Federal and State response to the virus has been evolving. The City Council approved a Declaration of a Local Emergency on March 17, 2020, which allows the City of Redding (City) to be better prepared to respond in any manner necessary should the virus continue to spread. The declaration allows the swift purchase of needed goods and services, the ability to respond to any public works needs, and provides for potential receipt of emergency aid from state, and possibly federal, authorities. On March 17, 2020, there was one confirmed case of Coronavirus in Shasta County.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.1(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency.

Packet Pg. 103
Report to Redding City Council January 9, 2022
Re: 4.1(a)--Confirmation of Continued Local Emergency Page 2 On March 19, 2020, the California State Public Health Officer and California State Governor Gavin Newsom issued a public health order for Californians to stay at home as a means to limit the spread of the virus statewide. In response, the City closed City Hall to the general public on March 20, 2020, and re-opened on August 31, 2020. Due to a surge in positive cases, it was necessary, once again, to close City Hall to the general public effective October 12, 2020. City facilities remained closed until March 1, 2021, when positive cases declined in Shasta County and the county moved back to the “red” tier.

As COVID-19 case rates continued to decline state-wide, Governor Newsom, on June 11, 2021, rescinded Executive Order N-33-20 (Stay-at-Home Order). As of this writing, City Hall is fully open to the general public and also continues to offer on-line and telephone services for those preferring not to conduct business face-to-face. As of December 15, 2021, the State of California is once again requiring the wearing face coverings in indoor spaces including City Hall and other City facilities. City management continues to monitor COVID-19 safety protocols issued by the California Public Health Officer and California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (CalOSHA) for updates and newly required safety measures.

Pursuant to Government Code section 3630(c) and Public Contract Code 20168 and 22050 (c)(1), the City Council must review the need for continuing the local emergency every regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council until the City Council terminates the local emergency. No public work which would otherwise be subject to competitive bidding has been accomplished to date. The City Manager, and other staff as deemed necessary, may provide an oral report to the City Council which will detail what has been learned to date about the impacts of Coronavirus in our community and what may be necessary to mitigate conditions which pose a threat to public health, safety, and welfare.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Packet Pg. 104

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize submission of a grant application through the California Department of Transportation Clean California Local Grant Program for $5,000,000 to support the litter abatement, beautification, safety, and public education efforts of the City of Redding on local streets, roads, pathways, trails, and parks in the Calaboose Creek area of Downtown Redding; and approve sponsorship of The McConnell Foundation grant application for the downtown plaza project to complete construction of a public park pending review of the application by the City Manager.

Fiscal Impact
If the City of Redding (City) is successful in obtaining grant funds, it may receive up to $5,000,000 with a required local match that ranges from 0 to 50 percent depending on the calculated severity of disadvantage (SOD) surrounding the project. Caltrans will provide a specific figure for the required match after reviewing applications based on the SOD. Using the grant program’s provided metrics, the proposed project qualifies as a disadvantaged community and the SOD should place potential match requirements at zero.

There is no direct fiscal impact for approving sponsorship of The McConnell Foundation’s grant application to the California Department of Transportation Clean California Local Grant Program (Caltrans CCLGP). The McConnell Foundation would be responsible for any match requirement.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could decline to authorize the application to the California Department of Transportation Clean California Local Grant Program (Caltrans CCLGP). The City would miss the opportunity to receive up to $5,000,000 with an estimate of no matching funds required. Further, without City sponsorship, The McConnell Foundation would not be able to apply directly to this program for funding.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(b)--Authorize Submission of Grant Application to California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Clean California Local Grant Program (CCLGP) Packet Pg. 105
Report to Redding City Council January 12, 2022
Re: 4.1(b)--Authorize Submission of a Grant Application Page 2 Background/Analysis
The Caltrans CCLGP is a competitive program created to beautify and clean up local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, transit centers, and other public spaces. The program is funded by an allocation of $296 million in Fiscal Year 2021-22 from the State General Fund and offers awards to eligible applicants up to a maximum of $5 million. The program goals are:
reduce waste and debris in public rights-of-way, pathways, parks, transit centers, and other public spaces; enhance, rehabilitate, restore, or install measures to beautify and improve public spaces and mitigate the urban heat island effect; enhance public health, cultural connections, and community placemaking by improving public spaces for walking and recreation; and advance equity for underserved communities.

The City would request up to $5 million to implement a CCLGP project along the section of Calaboose Creek from Shasta Street to Market Street. This area is a priority for litter abatement and waste reduction in addition to being within walking distance from intended active transportation corridors through Downtown Redding, Carnegie Park, and transit centers including the Amtrak Station and RABA Downtown Transfer. The requested funding will address litter abatement and waste removal, and include an educational component and physical infrastructure to beautify and encourage cleanliness and public safety in downtown while preserving and improving the natural elements of Calaboose Creek along the roadside.

If the City is awarded the grant funds, staff would present the award and match proposal, if any local match is required, to the City Council at a later date.

The McConnell Foundation (Foundation) plans to submit an application under this same grant program for gap funding for the downtown plaza project. The Foundation cannot apply directly to this program for funding and seeks the City’s sponsorship to secure the funds necessary to perform capital improvements at the downtown plaza. Upon completion, the downtown plaza project will be a public park, and as such, it is an eligible project under this program. The specific amount of the grant request and the maintenance details are still in review. Staff from the City Manager and Community Services Departments are working with The Foundation staff to complete the project scope and additional grant application.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 106

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution authorizing the submission of applications for all California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) grants for which the City of Redding is eligible through January 18, 2027, including the CalRecycle Senate Bill 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program for an allocated amount of $121,312 to support capacity planning, edible food recovery, and organic waste and edible food recovery education and outreach; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all grant documents necessary to apply for and secure the grant funds and implement the approved grant project(s).

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact in approving the resolution. If the City of Redding (City) submits a successful application, it would receive a $121,312 allocation from CalRecycle with no required matching funds. This resolution also allows the submission of subsequent grant applications to receive additional funds until January 18, 2027.

Alternative Action
The City Council could decline to authorize any applications for grants to CalRecycle which would result in the City not receiving the $121,312 allocation for Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383) available now, or any additional allocations available in the future. Further, a unique City Council resolution would be required for each CalRecycle grant opportunity going forward.

Background/Analysis
Each year, CalRecycle presents several opportunities to apply for grants. CalRecycle has developed a process for jurisdictions to streamline the submittals of grant applications whereby the governing body of the jurisdiction may pass a multi-year grant application resolution. The MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.1(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(c)--Authorize Submission of a Grant Application to California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) Senate Bill 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program
Packet Pg. 107
Report to Redding City Council January 12, 2022
Re: 4.1(c)--Authorize Submission of a Grant Application Page 2 City previously adopted a multi-year resolution, No. 2016-107, on December 14, 2016.

City Manager Policy 97-1 requires all grant applications over $70,000 be approved by the City Council. In the future, the City Council action would be required for large grant applications, but a new resolution would not be needed for five years, through January 18, 2027. Smaller grants could be submitted with administrative approval.

The Public Works Department plans to submit an application for funding through the CalRecycle SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program. This is a non-competitive grant program that will provide one-time funding to local jurisdictions to assist with the implementation of regulation requirements associated with SB 1383.

SB 1383 set methane emissions reduction targets for the State of California in an effort to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP). The targets include:
• Reduce organic waste disposal 50 percent by 2020 and 75 percent by 2025. • By 2025, rescue 20 percent of edible food, that would otherwise be landfilled, to be used to feed Californians in need.

CalRecycle prepared estimated allocations for each jurisdiction eligible to apply to the SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program based on population. The City of Redding has an estimated allocation of $121,312. Applicants who submit in the first round of funding may be eligible for additional funding later in the year from the allocations of jurisdictions that do not apply.

The City is requesting funding to support capacity planning, edible food recovery, and education and outreach. The grant term runs from April 1, 2022, until April 2, 2024, during which time the City must make all grant-eligible program expenditures or incur eligible costs. The City intends to focus funding from the grant program on capacity planning while reserving portions of the allocation for edible food recovery partnerships in the community and education and outreach material related to the implementation of statewide organic waste and edible food recovery regulations.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Resolution
Packet Pg. 108
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION(S) FOR ALL

CALRECYCLE GRANTS FOR WHICH THE CITY OF REDDING IS

ELIGIBLE
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code sections 48000 et seq. authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs (grants) in furtherance of the State of California’s (State) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated in the State thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety, and the environment; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of this authority CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the application, awarding, and management of the grants; and WHEREAS, CalRecycle grant application procedures require, among other things, an applicant’s governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council RESOLVES as follows:

1. To authorize the submittal of application to CalRecycle for all grants for which the City of Redding is eligible; and

2. To authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute in the name of the City of Redding all grant documents, including but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project; and

3. To adopt these authorizations as effective for 5 years from the date of adoption of this resolution, until January 18, 2027.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 18th day of January, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_______________________________
KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ ________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Resolution (4.1(c)--Authorize Submission of a Grant Application)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with Crosland Barnes Group, for

3.7 acres of City of Redding-owned property located at 5300 Venture Parkway, Stillwater Business Park Parcel 6A (Assessor’s Parcel Number 054-220-028), for fair market value; authorize the Mayor to sign the PSA and other documents needed to complete the sale and transfer of the property; and find the sale of the City-owned property is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15312 (Surplus Government Property Sales).

Fiscal Impact
There will be some costs associated with the transfer of the property including an updated appraisal (to be reimbursed at closing) and escrow fees. The net proceeds will be approximately $233,699, depending upon appraisal and closing costs, to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could alter the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement or choose not to sell the property at this time.

Background/Analysis
Crosland Barnes Group, has submitted an offer to purchase a portion of City of Redding owned property located at 5300 Venture Parkway (Assessor’s Parcel Number 054-220-028), also known as Stillwater Business Park Parcel 6 and depicted in the attached location map. Crosland Barnes Group is a real estate developer with a national portfolio of retail, commercial, and industrial properties.

The intended use of this portion of Parcel 6, referred to as Parcel 6A, is an industrial distribution facility for a local commercial client interested in expanding its business and moving into a larger facility.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.1(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(d)--Purchase and Sale Agreement with Crosland Barnes Group Janelle Galbraith, Economic
Development, Innovation &
Equity Manager
Packet Pg. 110
Report to Redding City Council January 11, 2022
Re: 4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6 Page 2 The listed property is a part of the Stillwater Business Park planned development. The value of the parcel in 2018 was $1.45 per square foot. Parcel 6A is 3.7 acres and, based on the 2018 value of the entire parcel, has an estimated value of $233,699. An updated appraisal is a required condition of the sale, and the ultimate sales price will be set by the value presented within the appraisal. The proposed agreement is to purchase the property at fair market value and suggests a due diligence period of 180 days.

The sale of the City-owned property presents no significant impact on the environment and is therefore categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15312 (Surplus Government Property Sales).

Pursuant to State of California legislation, the parcels must be designated surplus by adhering to specific surplus property procedures. The City is complying with Government Code Section 54220 and working with the California Department of Housing and Community Development to ensure the law is adhered to with the sale of all surplus properties. Staff requests approval of the negotiated purchase agreement for the sale of Stillwater Business Park Parcel 6A, and authorization to execute the agreement, open escrow, and execute any necessary documentation through the close of escrow to sell the aforementioned property.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Purchase and Sale Agreement
Location Map Parcel 6
Packet Pg. 111
Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: Purchase and Sale Agreement (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6) Airport Rd
Venture Pkwy
Rancho Rd
Toro Way
A
m
i
g
o
W
a
y
Airport Rd
Electro Way
Avtech Pkwy
Fiesta
W
Knighton Rd
Aviation Dr
Venture Pkwy
Muir Peak Rd
Lemurian Rd
Hotlam Rd
Stillwater Creek
Clover Creek
Stillwater Creek
Parcel 11B

56.9 ac
Parcel 13
35 ac
Parcel 4
29 ac
Parcel 12

25.4 ac
Parcel 14

22.5 ac
Parcel 7

16.7 ac
Parcel 5
15 ac
Parcel 1

12.4 ac
Parcel 9
10 ac
Parcel 6

8.7 ac
Parcel 8

7.5 ac
Parcel 15

7.9 ac
Parcel 10

6.9 ac
Parcel 3

5.3 ac
Parcel 16

5.3 ac
Parcel 2

3.3 ac
Parcel 11A

35.0 ac
Print Date: September 2020
P:\specprojects\StillwaterBusPark\ProProjects\StillwaterBusinessPark\StillwaterBusinessPark.aprx Redding
Municipal
Airport
Parcel Ownership:

Parcel 3: Pace Engineering
Parcel 7: Lassen Canyon Nursery
Parcel 11A: Cal Fire
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Stormwater Pipe
Wastewater Pipe
Water Pipe
Major Creek
Wetland
Conservation Easement
Stillwater Business Park Parcel
Stillwater Business Park
City Limit
Legend
City of Redding
AæH
AæH Aï
Aï
?f
?f
!"^$
!"^$
City of Redding
Shasta Lake City
Anderson
Project
Location
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Location Map Parcel 6 (4.1(d)--Purchase & Sale Agreement; Crosland Barnes Group; Stillwater Parcel 6)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution approving the following:
(1) Declaring hangar and ground space property located at Redding Municipal Airport, and described in Exhibit A, as exempt surplus property;
(2) Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to: (1) adhere to reporting and approval guidelines pursuant to the State of California Housing and Community Development Surplus Land Act Guidelines Section 400(e) with regard to negotiating and executing leases with current and future tenants for hangar and/or ground space for aviation related uses; (2) to negotiate the terms of the lease(s) of said property; and (3) execute any documents necessary to execute lease(s) with current and future tenants; (3) Finding the sale and/or lease of the Property by the City is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15312 of the CEQA Guidelines (Surplus Government Property Sales); and (4) Finding the sale and/or lease of the Property by the City is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (Common Sense Exemption) because the Property has no environmental attributes and, as a result, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the sale or lease of the Property and development of the same for aviation supportive uses will have a significant effect on the environment.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to declaring the listed properties exempt surplus. There may be financial benefit to the Airports Division in the event the properties are sold or leased.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not adopt the resolution and therefore not declare these properties as exempt surplus. In this case, the properties would not be able to be marketed, sold, or leased; and community members who desire to lease hangar space for aircraft and aviation related equipment storage would not be able to do so.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.1(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus Barry Tippin, City
Manager/Development
Services Director
Packet Pg. 129
Report to Redding City Council January 12, 2022
Re: 4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus Page 2 Background/Analysis
On January 1, 2020, legislation known as the Surplus Property Act (Assembly Bill 1486) was enacted by the State of California redirecting the process by which cities dispose of public land.

Prior to disposal, land must be declared “Surplus” or “Exempt Surplus.” The intention of the act is to ensure property is offered as available to build affordable housing prior to marketing the properties for sale to the private sector. Developers may request to be notified of available surplus property via the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) website. Each year, the City is also required to provide an updated list of its surplus properties to HCD; and approval is required from HCD prior to concluding any disposition of property.

Government Code section 54221(f)(1)(G) provides that surplus land that is subject to valid legal restrictions that are not imposed by the local agency and that would make housing prohibited, unless there is a feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the prohibition on the site, can be classified as exempt surplus property.

The Redding Municipal Airport (Airport) has ground space and hangar areas that can be used for municipal use, but can also be leased to community members and other governmental agencies for aviation related uses. As the Airport is the recipient of federal grant money, the mentioned properties are restricted by covenant and federal grant requirements to be used for aviation related purposes only, thereby eliminating its ability to be used for housing. As such, the property can be declared Exempt Surplus.

The attached resolution declares the hangars and ground space at Redding Municipal Airport as Exempt Surplus and authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to negotiate the terms of leases on this property with current and future tenants for aviation related uses. The sale and/or lease of these properties are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15312 (Surplus Government Sales) and Section 15061 (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines, because the aforementioned property has no environmental attributes and, as a result, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the sale or lease of the property, and development of the same for aviation supportive uses, will have a significant effect on the environment. Upon adoption of the resolution, the City Manager will comply with all HCD requirements with regard to negotiating and reporting the lease agreements with any tenants.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Resolution
Exhibit A (available online)
Exhibit B (available online)
Packet Pg. 130
RESOLUTION NO. 2021- ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

DECLARING HANGAR AND GROUND SPACE PROPERTY LOCATED

AT REDDING MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AS EXEMPT SURPLUS

PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR

DESIGNEE, TO NEGOTIATE THE TERMS OF THE LEASE(S) OF SAID

PROPERTY AND EXECUTE ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY

TO EXECUTE LEASE(S) WITH CURRENT AND FUTURE TENANTS
WHEREAS, the City of Redding owns property located at the Redding Municipal Airport, described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the City of Redding has determined that there is a need to utilize the property described in Exhibit A (hereafter, the “Property”) for non-public purposes, such as private aircraft and equipment storage and aviation education; and
WHEREAS, the Surplus Property Act (California Government Code section 54220 et seq.) provides guidelines for localities to follow regarding the sale and lease of City-owned property; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 54221(b) requires that a local agency shall, at a regular public meeting, declare land as either “surplus land” or “exempt surplus land” before it may take any action to dispose of the land; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 54221(f)(1)(G) provides that surplus land that is subject to valid legal restrictions that are not imposed by the local agency and that would make housing prohibited, unless there is a feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the prohibition on the site, can be classified as exempt surplus property; and WHEREAS, the Property is subject to valid legal restrictions imposed by federal law that would prohibit the residential use of the Property; and WHEREAS, per the Federal Register Volume 81, No. 115, Rules and Regulations: Policy on the Non-Aeronautical Use of Airport Hangars airport operators that have accepted federal grants may use airport property only for aviation-related purposes; and WHEREAS, when an airport operator accepts Airport Improvement Program grants or other FAA-administered financial assistance, each such airport operator must agree to comply with federal grant assurances; and
WHEREAS, Grant Assurance 19, Operation and Maintenance, prohibits an airport sponsor from causing or permitting any activity that would interfere with use of airport property for airport purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Property is subject to all FAA grant assurances, and, as a consequence, the Property the use of the Property is restricted to aviation uses only; and Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Resolution (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) WHEREAS, residential use of the Property would violate the aforementioned grant assurance because such use is not for aviation purposes; and WHEREAS, the United States of America conveyed the Property to the City of Redding by Instrument of Transfer dated October 7, 1947, attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit B, and that said Instrument of Transfer provides that the Property shall be used solely for “public airport purposes;” and
WHEREAS, due to operation of federal law and the aforementioned deed restriction, the Property therefore qualifies as “exempt surplus” land within the meaning of Government Code section 54221(f)(1)(G);

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

1. The above recitals are true, correct, and are adopted herein as findings of fact.

2. The Property is declared exempt surplus property, and shall hereafter be available for sale and lease subject to compliance with all federal grant assurances and the retention of any easement(s), if required, for public service purposes.

3. Sale and/or lease of the Property by the City is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15312 of the CEQA Guidelines (Surplus Government Property Sales).

4. Sale and/or lease of the Property by the City is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (Common Sense Exemption) because the Property has no environmental attributes and, as a result, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the sale or lease of the Property and development of the same for aviation supportive uses will have a significant effect on the environment.

5. The City Manager shall, pursuant to State of California Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) Surplus Land Act Guidelines Section 400(e), provide a copy of this resolution to the State of California Housing and Community Development Department at least thirty days prior to disposition of the Property.

6. The City Manager shall have authority to negotiate and, upon satisfaction of HCD Guideline Section 400(e), execute any lease(s) with current and future tenants for hangar and/or ground space for aviation related uses.

Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Resolution (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Redding City Council on the 18
th day of January, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBER:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBER:
____________________________________
KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ ____________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Resolution (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) No. REVISIONS DATE BY APP'D.

17 Airport Consultants 16

REDDING, CALIFORNIA

AIRPORT PROPERTY MAP
(EXHIBIT "A")


THE PREPARATION OF THESE DOCUMENTS WAS FINANCED IN PART THROUGH A PLANNING GRANT FROM THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 505 OF THE AIRPORT AND AIRWAY IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1982, AS AMENDED. THE CONTENTS DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OFFICIAL VIEWS OR POLICY OF THE FAA. ACCEPTANCE OF THESE DOCUMENTS BY THE FAA DOES NOT IN ANY WAY CONSTITUTE ACOMMITMENT OF THE PART OF THE UNITED STATES TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY DEVELOPMENT DEPICTED HEREIN NOR

DOES IT INDICATE THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS ENVIRONMENTALLY ACCEPTABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC LAWS.

REDDING MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
08/29/05 CA 11/08/05
AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN UPDATE (MASTER PLAN) 12/15/15 CA --AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN UPDATE (MASTER PLAN) Exhibit A
Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Exhibit A (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Exhibit B
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus) Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Exhibit B (available online) (4.1(f)--Resolution declaring Redding Municipal Airport property surplus)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the following relative to the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s (HCD) Homekey Program:
(1) Adopt Resolution authorizing the City of Redding (City) to submit, as a co-applicant with Rolling Oak, LLC, a Homekey Program grant application to HCD in the amount of $10 million to support the purchase of affordability covenants at 1178 Lake Boulevard; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign the grant application and all applicable documents to complete the application process.

Fiscal Impact
The City Redding (City) could receive up to $10 million in grant funds from the Homekey Program. The request for grant funds would include capital improvement costs in an amount up to $8 million and operating subsidy costs in an amount up to $2 million. Administrative costs are not an eligible use of grant funds and would be covered by other budgeted Housing Division funding sources.

Local match is not required for capital improvements, but if included, HCD will match on a 1:1 basis above the baseline grant amount. Any award for operating subsidies requires matching funds from any federal, State, local, private, or philanthropic sources. Local match will be determined during the application process, and if the City is awarded Homekey Program funds, staff would present the award and match proposal to the City Council (Council) at a later date.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.2(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(a)--Authorize Submission of a Grant Application as Co-applicant with Rolling Oak, LLC to the California Department of Housing and Community Development's Homekey Program
Steve Bade, Deputy City
Manager
Packet Pg. 146
Report to Redding City Council January 11, 2022
Re: 4.2(a)--Homekey Grant Application Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council could choose not to adopt the resolution authorizing the Homekey Program grant application. This action would prohibit the proposed project from going forward and staff would continue to outreach to other developers and service providers to identify another Homekey opportunity.

Background/Analysis
On September 9, 2021, HCD released a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the availability of $1.45 billion of Homekey Program funding. This continues the statewide effort to sustain and rapidly expand housing for persons experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness, including those who are inherently impacted by, or at risk of, medical diseases for conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Assembly Bill No. 140 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) provided the statutory basis for Round 2 of the Homekey Program by adding section 50675.1.3 to the Health and Safety Code (HSC). In addition, the Round 2 Homekey Program was exempted from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by section 50675.1.4 of the HSC. HCD welcomes and is considering a variety of innovative housing solutions as eligible project types for the Homekey Program.

Each region's share of the Homekey Program allocation is calculated based on its proportionate share of persons experiencing homelessness as indicated by both the sheltered and unsheltered 2019 Homeless Point-in-Time (PIT) counts, plus its proportionate share of extremely lowincome (ELI) renter households that are paying more than 50 percent of their income for rent.

HCD established a four-month priority application period from the release date of the Homekey application in late September through January 31, 2022. After January 31, 2022, HCD will stop grouping applications by geographic region, and instead deploy unused funds from any undersubscribed geographic region(s) to fund subsequent applications statewide. To further encourage the timely submission of Homekey applications, HCD will also award a bonus to applications submitted by January 31, 2022. The funds must be expended within eight months of the date of award and all operating funds must be fully expended by no later than June 30, 2026.

Staff contacted several nonprofit partners in the community notifying them of the grant opportunity and the City’s willingness to partner with a Homekey application. To date, none of those partners have submitted a proposal to the City.

Rolling Oak, LLC, (Rolling Oak) is the owner of Oakwood Mobile Home Park (Park) located at 1178 Lake Boulevard. The park is situated on 4.35 acres with 58 manufactured home spaces. Of the 58 spaces in the park, 31 units are tenant-owned, 15 spaces are occupied by RVs, and 12 spaces are vacant and available for future rental. The site also includes a laundry room, a studio apartment, and a small office.

Rolling Oak would like to partner with the City as co-applicants for Homekey Program funding.

As part of the application process, staff participated in a pre-application conference with representatives from HCD who expressed their support for the project. The request for funds would include capital improvement costs in an amount up to $8 million and operating subsidy costs in an amount up to $2 million for the following uses:

Packet Pg. 147
Report to Redding City Council January 11, 2022
Re: 4.2(a)--Homekey Grant Application Page 3
Capital Improvements:

1. In exchange for the purchase of 15 years of affordability covenants and restrictions on 20 units within the Park being made available for homeless Homekey participants, grant funds will be utilized for infrastructure improvements that include: electric, water, sewer, and solid waste for the property; accessibility improvements throughout the Park; rehabilitation of the office space; and landscaping and common area improvements within the Park.

2. It is anticipated that five units within the Park may require relocation. Relocation costs are determined based on individual circumstances of those occupants needing to relocate.

Estimated relocation costs are an eligible Homekey activity and will be included.

Operating Subsidy:

Operating subsidies are to assist the tenants with expenses that include: utilities, maintenance, management fees, taxes, licenses, and supportive services costs. Staff is working with service providers to determine the level of supportive services needed and to specifically identify a Homekey experienced supportive services provider.

In conclusion, the submission of the Homekey Program Grant Application to HCD may result in $10 million in funding that would provide 20 units of affordable housing for Homekey participants, with supportive services for 15 years. If Homekey Program funds are awarded, staff would present the award and match proposal to the Council, as well as negotiate a development agreement with Rolling Oak and return to the Council for its consideration of the agreement.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development- “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community”
Attachments
Resolution
Packet Pg. 148
RESOLUTION NO. 2022- __

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING THE JOINT APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE

HOMEKEY PROGRAM AND ADOPTING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO APPLY, ACCEPT, AMEND, AS NEEDED AND

IMPLEMENT THE HOMEKEY PROGRAM FOR THE GRANT TERM
A necessary quorum and majority of the Council Members of City of Redding (“Applicant”) hereby consents to, adopts and ratifies the following resolution:

WHEREAS, The Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has issued a Notice of Funding Availability, dated September 9, 2021 (“NOFA”), for the Homekey Program (“Homekey” or “Program”). The Department has issued the NOFA for Homekey grant funds pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 50675.1.3 (Assem. Bill No. 140 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.), § 20.); and WHEREAS, the City of Redding (“Co-Applicant”) desires to jointly apply for Homekey grant funds with Rolling Oak LLC (“Corporation”). Therefore, Co-Applicant is joining Corporation in the submittal of an application for Homekey funds (“Application”) to the Department for review and consideration; and WHEREAS, The Department is authorized to administer Homekey pursuant to the Multifamily Housing Program (Chapter 6.7 (commencing with Section 50675) of Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code). Homekey funding allocations are subject to the terms and conditions of the NOFA, the Application, the Department-approved STD 213, Standard Agreement (“Standard Agreement”), and all other legal requirements of the Homekey Program;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. Co-Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit a joint Application to the Department in response to the NOFA, and to jointly apply for Homekey grant funds in a total amount not to exceed $10,000,000.

2. If the Application is approved, Co-Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver a Standard Agreement in a total amount not to exceed $10,000,000, any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to secure the Homekey funds from the Department and to participate in the Homekey Program, and all amendments thereto (collectively, the “Homekey Documents”).

3. Co-Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Standard Agreement, and that the NOFA and Application will be incorporated in the Standard Agreement by reference and made a part thereof. Any and all activities, expenditures, information, and timelines represented in the Application are enforceable through the Standard Agreement. Funds are to be used for the allowable expenditures and activities identified in the Standard Agreement.

4. Barry Tippin, City Manager or his designee, is authorized to execute the Application and the Homekey Documents on behalf of Co-Applicant for participation in the Homekey Program.

Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Resolution [Revision 1] (4.2(a)--Homekey Grant Application) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 18th day of January, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBER:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBER:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF THE ATTESTING OFFICER
The undersigned, Pamela Mize, City Clerk, do hereby attest and certify that this Resolution is a true, full and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding which was duly convened and held on the date stated thereon, and that said document has not been amended, modified, repealed or rescinded since its date of adoption and is in full force and effect as of the date hereof.

ATTEST:

Signature of Attesting Officer
Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Resolution [Revision 1] (4.2(a)--Homekey Grant Application)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) Schedule No. 5254, for Replacement Playground Equipment for Indian Hills, Martin Luther King Jr., Peppertree, Ravenwood, Creekside, and Cumberland Parks.
(1) Award to Park Planet for $119,887.70, Kompan for $86,867.43, and Miracle Play Systems for $44,841.53 for a total amount not to exceed $251,596.66; (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the agreements, and any amendments, or additional documentation needed to complete the projects; and (3) Find that these projects are categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301 (a) and (d) – Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
The contract is funded by the Proposition 68 Per Capita Program, revenues from cell tower leases, the Park Development Fund, and an existing General Fund allocation. No additional funding is required. The total amount is $251,596.66.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to award the contract to Kompan, Park Planet, and Miracle Play Systems and provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
These playgrounds will replace six of the nine remaining wood playgrounds in the City of Redding (City). All of the playgrounds were built in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s.

Deterioration of the wood frames and vandalism has prompted the removal of playground equipment in the park spaces in the Ravenwood and Peppertree neighborhoods. These two neighborhoods have been without playgrounds at their parks for nearly two years and will be the MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.6(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5254 - Playground Equipment for Indian Hills, Martin Luther King Jr., PepperTree, Ravenwood, Creekside, and Cumberland Parks.

Kim Niemer, Community
Services Director
Packet Pg. 151
Report to Redding City Council January 12, 2022
Re: 4.6(a)--Award Bid No. 5254 for Playground Equipment Project Page 2 first to be replaced. The playgrounds at the Creekside, Indian Hills, MLK Jr, and Cumberland neighborhoods are in various stages of decay with components already removed. Playground equipment is a highly regulated product.

The City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on October 29, 2021, for the design and engineering of the six playgrounds; and the RFP was sent to six manufacturers which were given the opportunity to submit two designs for each location along with a budget for each. Four of the six firms submitted proposals - Kompan, Miracle Play Systems, Park Planet, and Dave Bang Associates.

A four-member selection panel, consisting of City staff from the Community Services Department evaluated the proposals based on the criteria outlined in the RFP. The three best designs for each site were then presented to residents in each neighborhood at meetings held at each of the park sites. Regardless of age, anyone present was able to vote for their preferred design. The design with the highest vote was selected. The winning manufacturers and awards are as follows:

Park Planet Cumberland $59,975.06
MLK Jr. $24,938.63
Ravenwood $34,974.01
Kompan Creekside $35,943.26
Peppertree $50,924.17
Miracle Play Systems Indian Hills $44,841.53
Staff has determined that these projects qualify as categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301 (a) and (d) - Existing Facilities.

The project areas do not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources, and the projects have no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Location Maps
Packet Pg. 152
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Location Maps (4.6(a)--Award Bid No. 5254 for Playground Equipment Project) Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Location Maps (4.6(a)--Award Bid No. 5254 for Playground Equipment Project) Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Location Maps (4.6(a)--Award Bid No. 5254 for Playground Equipment Project) Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Location Maps (4.6(a)--Award Bid No. 5254 for Playground Equipment Project) Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Location Maps (4.6(a)--Award Bid No. 5254 for Playground Equipment Project) Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Location Maps (4.6(a)--Award Bid No. 5254 for Playground Equipment Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize purchase of three (3) new 2021 Ford Interceptor Utility vehicles and one (1) new Dodge Durango V-6 AWD Pursuit vehicle from National Auto Fleet Group off the Sourcewell master vehicle contract at a total cost of $149,647.64.

Fiscal Impact
The Redding Police Department (RPD) has sufficient rolling stock funds available for this purchase.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to not authorize the purchase of the vehicles and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
Due to production delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, vehicle purchases have been significantly delayed with delivery times exceeding six months after placing an order. Not only has production been delayed, vehicle manufacturers are only taking orders for new vehicles for a short period of time. All vehicle order periods for the 2022 models have closed, and it is anticipated that orders will not be accepted again until summer 2022 for 2023 models. This delay has put a strain on RPD’s replacement of high mileage vehicles that are expensive to maintain.

Vehicles that have been ordered at the beginning of October 2021 are just now going into production and it will be several more months before they will be put into service.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.9(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase from National Auto Fleet Group for the Redding Police Department
Bill Schueller, Chief of Police
Packet Pg. 159
Report to Redding City Council January 11, 2022
Re: 4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase Page 2
It came to RPD’s attention that an agency had cancelled an order of the Ford Interceptor and Dodge Durango vehicles from National Auto Fleet Group and the vehicles have been made available to alternate agencies through a cooperative agreement with Sourcewell. These vehicles are in-stock and can be shipped immediately. Because there is an existing order of two (2) vehicles at a cost of $89,320 from National Auto Fleet Group, this purchase of three (3) Ford Interceptors and one (1) Dodge Durango at a cost of $149,647.64 would exceed the annual purchase limit through the cooperative agreement; therefore, this transaction requires the Council’s approval. If this purchase is not made, it is estimated that the earliest that new vehicles could be ordered is summer 2022. Moving forward with this purchase will allow the oldest vehicles in the fleet to be replaced in a timely manner.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online)
2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online)
Packet Pg. 160

January 5, 2022
Lieutenant Danny Smetak
City of Redding Police Department
777 Cypress Ave
Redding, Ca 96001
Delivery Via Email
Dear Lt. Smetak
In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to submit the following for your consideration:

National Auto Fleet Group will sell, service and deliver at Sacramento Lehr, new/unused 2021 Dodge Durango Pursuit V-6 AWD responding to your requirement with the attached specifications for $ 34,482.00 plus State Sales Tax, and $8.75 tire tax (non-taxable). These vehicles are available under the Sourcewell (Formerly Known as NJPA) master vehicle contract# 120716-NAFG. Units are Black.

Terms are net 30 days.

Delivery 15-30 Days ARO (Units are in Stock)
National Auto Fleet Group welcomes the opportunity to assist you in your vehicle requirements.

Kevin Buzzard
National Law Enforcement Sales Manager
National Auto Fleet Group
Wondries Fleet Group
626‐457‐5590 O / 714‐2641867 C
One Unit
MSRP One Unit Total Savings Total Savings
2021 Dodge Durango
V‐6 AWD Pursuit 39,660.00     34,482.00      13.06% 5,178.00 Sub Total 34,482.0      0
Sales Tax 2,499.95
Transportation 529.0            0
Tire Tax 8.75
Total 37,519.7      0
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104104_Durango (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase) Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 2021-12-19_104419_Interceptor (Available online) (4.9(a)--Authorize Vehicle Purchase)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5221 (Job No. 2644) South Bonnyview Road/I-5 Phase II Improvements Bechelli Lane Roundabout Project:
(1) Award to Tullis Inc. in the amount of $4,089,735;
(2) Approve an additional $400,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; and $700,000 for project development costs;
(3) Approve $410,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $100,000; (5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating an additional $3,150,000 in funding for the project; and
(6) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities and Section 15302(c) – Replacement or Reconstruction.

Fiscal Impact
At its regular meeting on October 20, 2020, the City Council (Council) approved the Transportation Infrastructure Agreement (TA) with Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco) and Rich Development Enterprises (Rich) for the I-5/South Bonnyview interchange, South Bonnyview Road and Bechelli Lane improvements. The TA laid the framework for regional transportation improvements in and around South Bonnyview Road, I-5, and Bechelli Lane. The City of Redding (City) has developed three capital projects to meet the conditions of the TA. The projects are referred to as the South Bonnyview Road/I-5 Phase II Improvements and include the Bechelli Roundabout Project (Project), the South Bonnyview/I-5 Interchange Ramps Project (Ramps) and the Bechelli/Loma Vista Signal Project (Loma Vista). These projects are being funded by the Citywide Transportation Impact Fees (TIF), Developer-paid TIF, and California MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5221 (Job Order No. 2644) South Bonnyview Road/I-5 Phase II Improvements Bechelli Lane Roundabout Project and Approve Budget Resolution
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 184
Report to Redding City Council January 11, 2022
Re: 4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem Page 2 Department of Transportation (Caltrans) State Highway Operation Protection Program (SHOPP) Minor A.

The estimated project budget for this Project is $5,700,000 (see table below). The Ramps project, which was awarded by the Council on December 7, 2021, is estimated at $5,250,000 and the Loma Vista project is approximately $800,000. The combined total regional projects’ estimated budget is $11,750,000. There is currently $8,600,000 budgeted for the projects. The increased costs are primarily due to escalated construction and materials costs. The attached budget resolution in the amount of $3,150,000 will provide the additional funding to award the Bechelli Roundabout Project and complete the Loma Vista project. It should be noted that project costs presented at this time are approximately $2,000,000 more than anticipated at the time of the 2019 Bond Sale to fund these improvements. This may delay other projects within the City’s TIF program further into the future depending on impact fee revenues received.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $700,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $4,499,735
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $400,000
Additional City Manager Authority $100,000
Total Project Costs $5,699,735
Project Budget $5,700,000
Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to award the bid for the Project and provide staff with alternate direction. If the Project is not awarded, the proposed improvements will not be constructed which are required Conditions of Approval for the regional development of the Rivercrossing Marketplace and also provide for acceptable traffic operations for the I-5 Interchange. This will impact the ability for Costco and Rich to gain occupancy on the development currently under construction on the northwest side of the interchange.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on December 16, 2021, for the Project. The low bid in the amount of $4,089,735 was received from Tullis Inc. of Redding, California. The engineer's estimate was $3,000,000. Total project development costs for the Project are estimated to be $700,000. Project development costs include engineering, surveying, right-of-way, environmental, consultant services, and permit fees.

As a part of the TA, the City is responsible for designing and constructing a two-lane roundabout at the South Bonnyview Road and Bechelli Lane intersection. This work includes temporary traffic control, construction of a roundabout island, earthwork, asphalt concrete paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, landscaping, street lighting, signing, striping and other miscellaneous items of work.

Packet Pg. 185
Report to Redding City Council January 11, 2022
Re: 4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem Page 3 Staff has determined that the project qualifies as Categorically Exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15301(c) – Existing Facilities and 15302(c) – Replacement or Reconstruction. The project area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources, and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution
Location Map
Bid Tabulation
Notice of Exemption
102020 Staff Report (available online)
Packet Pg. 186
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 23RD AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078
APPROPRIATING $3,150,000 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR THE SOUTH BONNYVIEW ROAD/I-5 PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS BECHILLI LANE
ROUNDABOUT PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
128 563

Traffic Impact Fee Capital $3,150,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Beginning Balance
128-563-1-0001-01 Beginning Balance $ 3,150,000
Increase Expenditures
128-563-4226-13 S. Bonnyview/I-5/Bechelli $ 3,150,000
Total $ 3,150,000 $ 3,150,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $3,150,000 to increase funding for the South Bonnyview Road/I-5 Phase II Improvements Bechelli Lane Roundabout Project for fiscal year 2021-22.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 18th day of January, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Resolution (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Location Map (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) BID TABULATION FOR:

S. BONNYVIEW ROAD/I-5 PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS BECHELLI LANE ROUNDABOUT Bid Schedule No.: 5221Job No.: 2644 ENGINEER'S EST Tullis, Inc. S.T. Rhoades Construction, Inc. 12/16/2021 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 2 Implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 3 Rain Event Action Plan EA 10 $300.00 $3,000.00 $100.00 $1,000.00 $1,200.00 $12,000.00 4 Erosion Control LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 5 Fiber Roll LF 400 $15.00 $6,000.00 $8.80 $3,520.00 $5.00 $2,000.00 6 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 9 $200.00 $1,800.00 $150.00 $1,350.00 $220.00 $1,980.00 7 Traffic Control LS 1 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 $564,000.00 $564,000.00 $450,000.00 $450,000.008 Construction Staking LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $41,000.00 $41,000.009 Construction Area Signs LS 1 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $1,690.00 $1,690.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 10 Project Funding Sign LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.0011 Portable Changeable Message Sign LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $17,500.00 $17,500.0012 Clear and Grub LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $196,000.00 $196,000.00 13(F) Excavation (Unclassified) CY 4500 $70.00 $315,000.00 $95.00 $427,500.00 $74.00 $333,000.00 14 Remove Tree EA 24 $1,000.00 $24,000.00 $1,500.00 $36,000.00 $500.00 $12,000.00 15 Remove Pavement Marking SF 1250 $7.00 $8,750.00 $4.00 $5,000.00 $4.00 $5,000.00 16 Remove Traffic Stripe LF 12000 $1.00 $12,000.00 $0.75 $9,000.00 $0.75 $9,000.00 17 Adjust Storm Drain Manhole Frame and
Cover EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,150.00 $1,150.00 18 Adjust Sanitary Sewer Manhole Frame and
Cover EA 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $8,000.00 $1,150.00 $4,600.00 19 Adjust Water Valve Cover EA 30 $600.00 $18,000.00 $600.00 $18,000.00 $950.00 $28,500.00 20 Modify Inlet EA 2 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $775.00 $1,550.00 $3,100.00 $6,200.00 21(F) Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 1500 $80.00 $120,000.00 $125.00 $187,500.00 $175.00 $262,500.00 22 Cold Mill Asphalt Concrete SY 10000 $15.00 $150,000.00 $12.00 $120,000.00 $5.50 $55,000.00 23 Asphalt Concrete (Type A) TON 2600 $140.00 $364,000.00 $160.00 $416,000.00 $190.00 $494,000.00 24 Sidewalk (4" PCC) SF 9250 $15.00 $138,750.00 $9.00 $83,250.00 $19.00 $175,750.00 25 Commercial Driveway SF 1100 $25.00 $27,500.00 $12.00 $13,200.00 $22.00 $24,200.00 26 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 700 $30.00 $21,000.00 $18.50 $12,950.00 $30.00 $21,000.00 27 Truncated Domes SF 500 $50.00 $25,000.00 $36.00 $18,000.00 $27.00 $13,500.00 28 Concrete Curb LF 2710 $30.00 $81,300.00 $38.00 $102,980.00 $69.00 $186,990.00 29 Concrete Curb (Type 3M) LF 300 $40.00 $12,000.00 $71.00 $21,300.00 $110.00 $33,000.00 30 Curb and Gutter (Modified 6") LF 1200 $40.00 $48,000.00 $39.00 $46,800.00 $64.00 $76,800.00 31 Repair Sidewalk Wall LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.0032 Concrete Retaining Curb LF 120 $65.00 $7,800.00 $600.00 $72,000.00 $300.00 $36,000.00 33 Concrete Retaining Curb with Drainage LF 120 $75.00 $9,000.00 $625.00 $75,000.00 $350.00 $42,000.00 34 Concrete Foundation (Sculpture) LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,875.00 $1,875.00 $2,250.00 $2,250.0035 Truck Apron SF 3050 $25.00 $76,250.00 $21.50 $65,575.00 $34.00 $103,700.00 36 Storm Drain (6" Perforated PVC) LF 110 $30.00 $3,300.00 $20.00 $2,200.00 $110.00 $12,100.00 37 Storm Drain (15" HDPE) LF 248 $115.00 $28,520.00 $350.00 $86,800.00 $260.00 $64,480.00 38 Storm Drain (15" RCP) LF 64 $225.00 $14,400.00 $300.00 $19,200.00 $250.00 $16,000.00 39 Storm Drain (18" HDPE) LF 232 $130.00 $30,160.00 $400.00 $92,800.00 $240.00 $55,680.00 Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Bid Tabulation (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) BID TABULATION FOR:

S. BONNYVIEW ROAD/I-5 PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS BECHELLI LANE ROUNDABOUT Bid Schedule No.: 5221Job No.: 2644 ENGINEER'S EST Tullis, Inc. S.T. Rhoades Construction, Inc. 12/16/2021 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 40 Modified Catch Basin No. 3 EA 2 $7,500.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $24,000.00 $5,900.00 $11,800.00 41 Modified Catch Basin No. 3 (w/ Baffle) EA 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $6,900.00 $6,900.0042 Catch Basin No. 3 EA 5 $5,500.00 $27,500.00 $10,000.00 $50,000.00 $5,400.00 $27,000.0043 Flared End Section (15" RCP) EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,800.00 $3,600.0044 Rock Energy Dissipater CY 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $150.00 $600.00 $200.00 $800.0045 Bioretention Soil CY 150 $120.00 $18,000.00 $100.00 $15,000.00 $250.00 $37,500.00 46 Drain Rock CY 80 $140.00 $11,200.00 $206.00 $16,480.00 $300.00 $24,000.00 47 Filter Fabric SY 610 $5.00 $3,050.00 $6.00 $3,660.00 $2.50 $1,525.00 48 Landscaping and Irrigation LS 1 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $642,000.00 $642,000.00 $575,000.00 $575,000.0049 Water Main (4" DIP) LF 80 $85.00 $6,800.00 $250.00 $20,000.00 $425.00 $34,000.00 50 Water Main (6" DIP) LF 34 $170.00 $5,780.00 $400.00 $13,600.00 $1,025.00 $34,850.00 51 Water Valve (4" Gate Valve) EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 52 Water Valve (6" Gate Valve) EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.0053 Blind Flange (6") EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.0054 Blind Flange (20") EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $8,100.00 $8,100.0055 4" Blow-Off Valve EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.0056 Remove Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.0057 Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 2 $7,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $9,200.00 $18,400.0058 Relocate sign EA 2 $400.00 $800.00 $300.00 $600.00 $465.00 $930.0059 Reset Sign EA 4 $400.00 $1,600.00 $300.00 $1,200.00 $325.00 $1,300.0060 Install Sign EA 47 $750.00 $35,250.00 $450.00 $21,150.00 $495.00 $23,265.00 61 Install Sign (Two-post) EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $750.00 $4,500.00 $750.00 $4,500.00 62 Object Marker (Type OM1-3) EA 5 $200.00 $1,000.00 $50.00 $250.00 $275.00 $1,375.0063 Pavement Marking (Temporary, Paint) SF 900 $10.00 $9,000.00 $5.00 $4,500.00 $5.00 $4,500.00 64 Traffic Stripe (Temporary, Paint) LF 7800 $1.50 $11,700.00 $1.10 $8,580.00 $1.10 $8,580.00 65 Traffic Stripe (6" Thermoplastic) LF 15000 $2.00 $30,000.00 $1.25 $18,750.00 $1.25 $18,750.00 66 Traffic Stripe (8" Thermoplastic) LF 1700 $4.00 $6,800.00 $1.65 $2,805.00 $1.65 $2,805.00 67 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 3400 $10.00 $34,000.00 $6.50 $22,100.00 $6.50 $22,100.00 68 Pavement Marker EA 540 $12.00 $6,480.00 $8.00 $4,320.00 $8.00 $4,320.00 69 Install Centerline Monument and Cover EA 4 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,900.00 $7,600.00 70 Trench (Secondary) LF 1400 $50.00 $70,000.00 $75.00 $105,000.00 $70.00 $98,000.00 71 Remove Traffic Signal LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $66,000.00 $66,000.00 $62,500.00 $62,500.0072 Street Lighting LS 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $155,000.00 $155,000.00 $265,000.00 $265,000.0073 Contractor Supplied Archaeological Monitor LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $18,900.00 $18,900.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.0074 Contractor Supplied Biologist LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $3,015,590.00 $4,089,735.00 $4,158,580.00 Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions.

Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Bid Tabulation (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) BID TABULATION FOR:

S. BONNYVIEW ROAD/I-5 PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS BECHELLI
Bid Schedule No.: 5221Job No.: 264412/16/2021

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 1
2 Implement Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan LS 1
3 Rain Event Action Plan EA 10
4 Erosion Control LS 1
5 Fiber Roll LF 400
6 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA 9
7 Traffic Control LS 18 Construction Staking LS 19 Construction Area Signs LS 1 10 Project Funding Sign LS 111 Portable Changeable Message Sign LS 112 Clear and Grub LS 1 13(F) Excavation (Unclassified) CY 4500
14 Remove Tree EA 24
15 Remove Pavement Marking SF 1250
16 Remove Traffic Stripe LF 12000
17 Adjust Storm Drain Manhole Frame and
Cover EA 1
18 Adjust Sanitary Sewer Manhole Frame and
Cover EA 4
19 Adjust Water Valve Cover EA 30
20 Modify Inlet EA 2
21(F) Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 1500
22 Cold Mill Asphalt Concrete SY 10000
23 Asphalt Concrete (Type A) TON 2600
24 Sidewalk (4" PCC) SF 9250
25 Commercial Driveway SF 1100
26 Concrete Curb Ramp SF 700
27 Truncated Domes SF 500
28 Concrete Curb LF 2710
29 Concrete Curb (Type 3M) LF 300
30 Curb and Gutter (Modified 6") LF 1200
31 Repair Sidewalk Wall LS 132 Concrete Retaining Curb LF 120 33 Concrete Retaining Curb with Drainage LF 120
34 Concrete Foundation (Sculpture) LS 135 Truck Apron SF 3050 36 Storm Drain (6" Perforated PVC) LF 110
37 Storm Drain (15" HDPE) LF 248
38 Storm Drain (15" RCP) LF 64
39 Storm Drain (18" HDPE) LF 232
J. F. Shea, Inc. Jason Abel Construction, Inc. AVERAGE

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
$2,035.00 $2,035.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,508.75
$40,285.00 $40,285.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $29,321.25
$550.00 $5,500.00 $1,500.00 $15,000.00 $837.50
$4,240.00 $4,240.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $10,685.00
$10.00 $4,000.00 $8.00 $3,200.00 $7.95
$270.00 $2,430.00 $350.00 $3,150.00 $247.50
$572,000.00 $572,000.00 $69,000.00 $69,000.00 $413,750.00 $42,680.00 $42,680.00 $49,450.00 $49,450.00 $45,782.50
$4,125.00 $4,125.00 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $4,828.75$1,925.00 $1,925.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,856.25 $36,960.00 $36,960.00 $61,500.00 $61,500.00 $35,240.00$21,000.00 $21,000.00 $1,127,000.00 $1,127,000.00 $373,500.00 $70.00 $315,000.00 $25.00 $112,500.00 $66.00
$715.00 $17,160.00 $1,500.00 $36,000.00 $1,053.75
$4.40 $5,500.00 $6.00 $7,500.00 $4.60$0.83 $9,960.00 $0.86 $10,320.00 $0.80 $5,700.00 $5,700.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $2,512.50$3,780.00 $15,120.00 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $2,032.50 $755.00 $22,650.00 $950.00 $28,500.00 $813.75
$5,500.00 $11,000.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $2,531.25
$60.00 $90,000.00 $69.50 $104,250.00 $107.38$10.95 $109,500.00 $3.60 $36,000.00 $8.01 $152.00 $395,200.00 $169.00 $439,400.00 $167.75
$22.00 $203,500.00 $16.50 $152,625.00 $16.63$28.00 $30,800.00 $22.40 $24,640.00 $21.10$52.00 $36,400.00 $23.00 $16,100.00 $30.88$42.00 $21,000.00 $41.00 $20,500.00 $36.50$63.00 $170,730.00 $42.50 $115,175.00 $53.13 $101.00 $30,300.00 $80.00 $24,000.00 $90.50
$84.00 $100,800.00 $60.00 $72,000.00 $61.75
$12,200.00 $12,200.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $12,300.00
$950.00 $114,000.00 $890.00 $106,800.00 $685.00$945.00 $113,400.00 $900.00 $108,000.00 $705.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,281.25
$34.00 $103,700.00 $40.00 $122,000.00 $32.38$83.00 $9,130.00 $180.00 $19,800.00 $98.25 $176.00 $43,648.00 $185.00 $45,880.00 $242.75$308.00 $19,712.00 $250.00 $16,000.00 $277.00$193.00 $44,776.00 $190.00 $44,080.00 $255.75 Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Bid Tabulation (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) BID TABULATION FOR:

S. BONNYVIEW ROAD/I-5 PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS BECHELLI
Bid Schedule No.: 5221Job No.: 264412/16/2021

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
40 Modified Catch Basin No. 3 EA 2
41 Modified Catch Basin No. 3 (w/ Baffle) EA 142 Catch Basin No. 3 EA 543 Flared End Section (15" RCP) EA 244 Rock Energy Dissipater CY 445 Bioretention Soil CY 150 46 Drain Rock CY 80
47 Filter Fabric SY 610
48 Landscaping and Irrigation LS 149 Water Main (4" DIP) LF 80 50 Water Main (6" DIP) LF 34
51 Water Valve (4" Gate Valve) EA 1
52 Water Valve (6" Gate Valve) EA 153 Blind Flange (6") EA 154 Blind Flange (20") EA 155 4" Blow-Off Valve EA 156 Remove Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 157 Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 258 Relocate sign EA 259 Reset Sign EA 460 Install Sign EA 47 61 Install Sign (Two-post) EA 6
62 Object Marker (Type OM1-3) EA 563 Pavement Marking (Temporary, Paint) SF 900 64 Traffic Stripe (Temporary, Paint) LF 7800
65 Traffic Stripe (6" Thermoplastic) LF 15000
66 Traffic Stripe (8" Thermoplastic) LF 1700
67 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 3400
68 Pavement Marker EA 540
69 Install Centerline Monument and Cover EA 4
70 Trench (Secondary) LF 1400
71 Remove Traffic Signal LS 172 Street Lighting LS 173 Contractor Supplied Archaeological Monitor LS 174 Contractor Supplied Biologist LS 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Spec J. F. Shea, Inc. Jason Abel Construction, Inc. AVERAGE

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
$8,250.00 $16,500.00 $6,500.00 $13,000.00 $8,162.50$8,250.00 $8,250.00 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $9,912.50$6,270.00 $31,350.00 $4,500.00 $22,500.00 $6,542.50$1,870.00 $3,740.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,792.50 $270.00 $1,080.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $280.00$195.00 $29,250.00 $875.00 $131,250.00 $355.00$275.00 $22,000.00 $725.00 $58,000.00 $376.50 $6.00 $3,660.00 $20.00 $12,200.00 $8.63
$777,500.00 $777,500.00 $503,792.00 $503,792.00 $624,573.00 $302.00 $24,160.00 $685.00 $54,800.00 $415.50$533.00 $18,122.00 $690.00 $23,460.00 $662.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $950.00 $950.00 $3,162.50$4,950.00 $4,950.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,612.50 $990.00 $990.00 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $2,272.50
$1,980.00 $1,980.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,645.00$7,700.00 $7,700.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $5,300.00$1,100.00 $1,100.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,450.00 $12,650.00 $25,300.00 $12,500.00 $25,000.00 $12,337.50
$512.00 $1,024.00 $350.00 $700.00 $406.75$350.00 $1,400.00 $350.00 $1,400.00 $331.25$545.00 $25,615.00 $450.00 $21,150.00 $485.00$825.00 $4,950.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $956.25$302.00 $1,510.00 $50.00 $250.00 $169.25 $5.00 $4,500.00 $5.75 $5,175.00 $5.19$1.21 $9,438.00 $1.27 $9,906.00 $1.17$1.38 $20,700.00 $1.44 $21,600.00 $1.33$1.82 $3,094.00 $1.90 $3,230.00 $1.76$7.15 $24,310.00 $7.48 $25,432.00 $6.91$8.80 $4,752.00 $9.25 $4,995.00 $8.51 $990.00 $3,960.00 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 $1,347.50
$94.00 $131,600.00 $159.50 $223,300.00 $99.63
$60,500.00 $60,500.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $53,500.00
$308,000.00 $308,000.00 $272,090.00 $272,090.00 $250,022.50 $15,400.00 $15,400.00 $70,725.00 $70,725.00 $30,006.25
$7,375.00 $7,375.00 $8,410.00 $8,410.00 $4,846.25

AVERAGE BID
$4,400,126.00 $4,699,085.00 $4,336,881.50
Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Bid Tabulation (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Notice of Exemption (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the Transportation Infrastructure Agreement (Traffic Agreement) with the Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco) and Rich Development Enterprises (Rich) for I-5/South Bonnyview interchange, South Bonnyview Road and Bechelli Lane improvements; and authorize the Mayor to execute said Traffic Agreement.

Fiscal Impact
The total cost of all transportation infrastructure associated with the River Crossing Marketplace Project (Project), including project development and construction, is estimated to be approximately $18.4 million. Nearly $4 million was already expended with the completion of northbound I-5 on-ramp widening associated with the Churn Creek Marketplace project on the east side of the I-5/Bonnyview interchange. The interchange, the South Bonnyview/Bechelli intersection and the Bechelli/Loma Vista intersection improvements are expected to be $7.5 million and are included in the adopted Citywide Transportation Development Impact Fee Program (TIF). The frontage improvements and directly related turn lane/signal/median improvements to and from the River Crossing Marketplace (RCM) Project are expected to be just under $1.8 million. In accordance with the proposed Traffic Agreement, the City of Redding (City) will be responsible for funding and constructing the TIF related improvements (City project) and Costco-Rich will be responsible for funding and constructing the frontage and other related improvements.

Costco-Rich TIF fees are estimated to be $3.2 million and will be deposited with the City in advance of construction of the City project. The remaining balance will be funded from TIF bond revenues approved by the City Council (Council) on April 16, 2019. The City is also working on a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to provide funding for improvements that address existing operational deficiencies within the interchange and identify the roles/responsibilities for each agency during construction within Caltrans right of way. It is noted that the project costs and anticipated TIF fees are estimates and may increase MEETING DATE: October 20, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(f)--Transportation Infrastructure Agreement for River Crossing Marketplace Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Report to Redding City Council October 12, 2020
Re: 4.11(f)--Transportation Infrastructure Agrmt for River Crossing Marketplace Proj Page 2 or decrease pending actual project construction costs and the structures developed with the project.

The Churn Creek Road/Rancho Road/Victor Avenue intersection improvements are included in the TIF Program and will be constructed by the City at a later date and separate from this Traffic Agreement at an estimated cost of $5.1 million.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could decide to not approve the agreement. It is expected that this action will likely result in the project not moving forward in the short term.

Background/Analysis
On May 19, 2020, the Council approved the River Crossing Marketplace (RCM) Project (Specific Plan SP-2017-00082). The conditions of development for the project require various transportation related infrastructure improvements including, but not limited to, the I5/Bonnyview Interchange, the South Bonnyview/Bechelli intersection and the Bechelli/Loma Vista intersection improvements. These interchange and intersection improvements are included in the City’s TIF Program and are therefore eligible for credit and/or reimbursement in accordance with Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code. The developer of the project has requested that the Council consider credit/reimbursement for the conditioned improvements.

City staff and RCM representatives have completed negotiations culminating in a proposed Traffic Agreement for the Council’s consideration. The agreement includes the following key elements:
• Project Delineation – The City will be responsible for designing and constructing the interchange improvements as well as the South Bonnyview/Bechelli and Bechelli/Loma Vista intersection improvements. The interchange work will generally consist of widening both the northbound and southbound off-ramps to accommodate additional traffic demand. A two-lane roundabout will be constructed at the South Bonnyview/Bechelli intersection and a new traffic signal at the Bechelli/Loma Vista intersection. The construction project(s) will be delivered via public works contract(s), awarded by the City Council, and administered by City staff/consultant. The anticipated costs, including construction management and capital, are estimated at $7.5 million.

These project costs are eligible for credit-reimbursement.

Costco-Rich will be responsible for the frontage along South Bonnyview and Bechelli including curb, gutter and sidewalk, streetlights, roadway widening for turn lanes, median relocation along Bechelli, and traffic signal modification at the entrance of the project which is shared with Blue Shield. The City will provide the final roadway wearing surface, striping, and signage along Bechelli Lane.
• Right of Way – RCM will be responsible for dedication of all necessary right of way along all project frontages for roadway widening including along I-5. In addition, RCM will be responsible for acquiring all off-site right of way necessary for the roundabout installation with dedication to the City. The City will provide all necessary right of way engineering for the proposed acquisition of the off-site right of way.

Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Report to Redding City Council October 12, 2020
Re: 4.11(f)--Transportation Infrastructure Agrmt for River Crossing Marketplace Proj Page 3 • Project Financing and TIF Credit/Reimbursement – The agreement requires RMC to advance payment of all estimated TIF fees associated with the Specific Plan prior to the City soliciting construction bids. The agreement allows for TIF credit as properties develop in the River Crossing Marketplace Shopping Center.

Should the City Council approve the agreements, construction of the transportation improvements should begin in summer 2021 and be completed the following spring.

The agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Location Map
Transportation Infrastructure Agreement (available online) Exhibit A (available online)
Exhibit B (available online)
Exhibit C (available online)
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) Total Est. Cost
SP Condition Scope Est. Cost Scope Est. Cost Comments
Bechelli Area
Loma Vista Intersection 71 Proportionate Share of signal per Condition 71 100,000 $ Full Signal* $ 400,000 $ 500,000 Costco to provide proportionate share, City to build
prior to occupancy
Loma Vista Traffic Calming 67 Complete Traffic Calming Measures per Condition 67 50,000 $ None $ ‐ $ 50,000 Costco to construct measures per EIR commitment Bechelli (north of intersection) 55‐57, 59‐63, 68, 73 Widening, Frontage, Intersections, right of way 770,000 $ Final Overlay, Micro‐surfacing and
Final Striping* $ 210,000 $ 980,000
Costco to construct all improvements, City to provide
final overlay and final striping
Bonnyview ‐ Intersection to Fwy. 55, 59‐63 Frontage, Widening, Right of Way Acquisition/Dedication $ 600,000 Roundabout* $ 2,600,000 $ 3,200,000 City to construct Roundabout and all widening on
Bonnyview
Interchange
SB Off Ramp
Intersection 55, 64, 69 Frontage along Bonnyview and all right of way 320,000 $ Remaining Intersection Work* $ 540,000 $ 860,000 Intersection Work Only Ramp 55, 64, 69 All right of way dedication $ ‐ Ramp Widening* $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 City to construct ramp widening ‐ aux lane may be
added by Caltrans and City
NB Off Ramp
Intersection 65, 70 None $ ‐ All Intersection Improvements* $ 310,000 $ 310,000 City to construct Intersection improvements.

Ramp 65, 70 None $ ‐ Ramp Widening* $ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000 City ot construct ramp widening NB On Ramp None
Other City Improvement Outside
of this Agreement $ 3,959,200 $ 3,959,200
Ramp Widening ‐ Project is Complete with Previously
Entitled Projects
Churn Creek Bottom
Hartmeyer 66 Proportionate Share of Intersection per Condition 66 200,000 $ None $ ‐ $ 200,000 City to Transfer Proportionate Share to CountyRancho‐Victor‐Huntington 66, 72 None $ ‐ Other City Improvement Outside
of this Agreement $ 5,100,000 $ 5,100,000
Future Roundabout and Churn Creek Improvements
by City
Total Costs $ 2,040,000 $ 16,319,200 $ 18,359,200
Exhibit A
Costco‐Rich‐City Transportation Infrastructure Responsibility and Estimated Costs Description Costco‐Rich Improvements (see Exhibit B for More Detail) City Improvements Transportation Infrastructure Agreement (9/17/20)
City of Redding – Costco Wholesale Corporation – Rich Development Corporation Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 MAJOR 1 16,300 SF SHOP 1 21,400 SF 9,690 SF MAJOR 2 SHOPS 2 6,000 SF PAD 2 5,700 SF PAD 1
2,800 SF NORTH SCALE: 1"=100'
MATCH LINE "A"
MATCH LINE "A" Filename: N:\US\Redding\Projects\561\11212562\Digital_Design\ACAD 2018\Figures\11212562 EX_COSTCO_Rich Improvement.dwg Plot Date: 18 September 2020 - 1:13 PM Date Computer No. Project No. 11145014 2226 06.04.19 COSTCO - RICH IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT B-1 LEGEND NOTES Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) SCALE: 1"=10' SCALE: 1"=10' SCALE: 1"=10' SCALE: 1"=10' NOTES Filename: N:\US\Redding\Projects\561\11212562\Digital_Design\ACAD 2018\Figures\11212562 EX_COSTCO_Rich Improvement.dwg Plot Date: 18 September 2020 - 1:13 PM Date Computer No. Project No. COSTCO - RICH IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT B-2 06.04.19 2226 11145014 LEGEND Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) SCALE: 1"=10' SCALE: 1"=10' LEGEND NOTES Filename: N:\US\Redding\Projects\561\11212562\Digital_Design\ACAD 2018\Figures\11212562 EX_COSTCO_Rich Improvement.dwg Plot Date: 18 September 2020 - 1:13 PM Date Computer No. Project No. COSTCO - RICH IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT B-3 06.04.19 2226 11145014 Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem) City Fee Rate 2020 Estimated Fees
Costco
Retail Store (152,101 square feet)
152,101 Store ‐ 857 Discount Club $9698 per thousand sf $                      1,475,075 30 fueling Stations (9000 sf)/sales kiosk (540sf)
30 Pumps ‐ 944 ‐ Gas/Service Station 24214 per pump 726,420 $ Costco Only Subtotal $                      2,201,495
Rich Development
Retail Shops: Major 1, Major 2, Retail ‐ 37,700 sf retail 37,700 sf retail ‐ 820 Shopping Center Retail $9698 per thousand sf $                         361,735 Pad 1: Fast Food Rest. w/ Drive Thru (2,800 sf)
2,800sf ‐ (934 fast food with drive thru $50558 per thousand sf $                         141,562 Pad 2: Coffe Shop w/ Drive Thru (2,500sf) and Small Retail (3200 sf) 2,500 sf ‐ 937 coffee shop with drive through $68750 per thousand sf $                         171,875 3,200 sf ‐ 820 Retail $9698 per thousand sf $                            31,034 Subtotal $                         202,909
Shops 1: Small Restaurant (6400 sf) and 3 tenant retail spaces (3,290 sf) 6,400 sf ‐ 932  retail $28167 per thousand sf $                         180,269 3,290 sf ‐ 820  retail $9698 per thousand sf $                            31,906 Subtotal $                         212,175
Shops 2: 1 tenant spaces (6,000sf)
6,000sf ‐ 820 retail $9698 per thousand sf $                            58,188 Subtotal $                            58,188
Rich Only Subtotal $                         976,570
Costco Plus Rich Total $                      3,178,065 Exhibit C (7/6/20)
Transportation Fee Estimate
Estimated Transportation Fees
Transportation Infrastructure Agreement (7/6/20)
City of Redding – Costco Wholesale Corporation – Rich Development Corporation Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 102020 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(a)--Award Bid No. 5221; S. Bonnyview Rd/I-5 Phase II Improvem)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the Mayor to execute a Cooperative Agreement (Agreement) with the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) for member agency participation.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of approving the proposed Agreement, as it simply formalizes the statutorily designated roles and responsibilities of each agency when coordinating as a region on transportation and transit related issues. A minor amount of staff time was used to review and negotiate the Agreement.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize the Mayor to execute the attached Agreement and instead provide staff with alternate direction. This alternative will lead to further consultation with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) to ensure the City of Redding (City) maintains eligibility for future funding allocations.

Background/Analysis
SRTA has been operating as a separate and distinct public agency without any formal organizational agreement with its member agencies following its separation from Shasta County in 2012. The proposed Agreement will formally recognize SRTA’s role as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for State of California (State) funding and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for federal funds. SRTA oversees the allocation of funding for certain State and federal programs to member agencies through their role as the RTPA and MPO.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Cooperative Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Agency Participation
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 215
Report to Redding City Council January 12, 2022
Re: 4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Agency Participation Page 2
Since December 2019, the SRTA Board of Directors (Board) considered information on several occasions (see attached SRTA Board Items) and provided direction to its staff to develop a formal agreement with member agencies that would recognize SRTA, its role in the region, and clarify how the agencies will cooperatively participate in SRTA activities. The process started with a proposal to execute a Joint Powers Agreement that would establish SRTA as a Staterecognized Council of Government (COG). Formation of a COG could provide a regional decision-making body for not only transportation related roles and cooperation, but potentially other cross jurisdictional functions like housing or groundwater. SRTA staff also suggested changes to the City of Redding representation on the SRTA Board desiring to eliminate the RABA representative and adding a second City of Redding representative. Staff from the member agencies weighed the benefits and implications of forming a COG and the City’s representation on the SRTA Board. After several discussions with management staff from each member agency and SRTA, it was agreed that a simple cooperative agreement would suffice in providing the formal recognition desired. The proposed Agreement is the culmination of those discussions.

The Agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney and the other participating partners.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operation item.

Attachments
Agreement
10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online)
Packet Pg. 216

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Representing: County of Shasta, City of Anderson, City of Redding, and City of Shasta Lake
V.8
(January 3, 2022)
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Agency Participation)

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR

MEMBER AGENCY PARTICIPATION
THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the date of the last signature affixed hereto by and among the cities of Anderson, Redding, Shasta Lake, and the county of Shasta, heretofore named “member agencies.”
RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the people residing within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Shasta County have an interest in a well-coordinated and planned transportation system; and WHEREAS, State and Federal legislators designated the Shasta region as a State Local Transportation Commission in 1972 (PUC §130000 et al.) (Government Code §29532, 29535) and a Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization in 1981 (USC Title 23, §134); and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2012, the agency reorganized to form the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA), a separate and distinct entity from its member agencies; and WHEREAS, the member agencies desire to establish this Agreement in order to: (1) formally recognize the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency as the regional transportation planning entity under State and Federal law; (2) outline the agency’s purpose and functions as defined by those laws as updated from time-to-time; (3) agree to promote a governing structure to address transportation-related needs of regional significance; and (4) facilitate cooperation among its member agencies; and
WHEREAS, transportation and transportation-related challenges and opportunities within the region transcend local governmental boundaries and have Countywide implications; and WHEREAS, there is a demonstrated need for an organization with representatives from the member agencies to provide a forum to address these challenges and opportunities; and WHEREAS, the member agencies believe that a Countywide transportation planning organization, governed by elected officials from among the member agencies is best suited for this type of regional coordination; and
WHEREAS, the member agencies, working together through this organization can exercise initiative, leadership, and responsibility for addressing Countywide transportation-related issues; and
WHEREAS, the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency can conduct certain governmental operations of common interest efficiently and economically through the cooperation of its members and the pooling of common resources.

Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Agency Participation)

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Page | 3
IN WITNESS THEREOF, it is mutually agreed asfollows:

1. THE SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
By adoption of this Agreement, the parties hereto formally recognize the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency, separate and distinct from its member entities, as the agent which exercises the roles and responsibilities described in this Agreement.

The Shasta Regional Transportation Agency serves as both the Local Transportation Commission as designated by what wasthen known asthe Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency for the State of California; (Government Code §29535) and as the Federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization as approved by the Governor of California for the Shasta County region. Inherent in these State and Federal designations are the following responsibilities:
a. Act as lead-agency for determination of any applicable air quality conformity between transportation plans, transportation programs, and transportation projects and the applicable State Implementation Plan in accordance with Title 23 USC §134;
b. Serve asthe regional transportation planning and programming representative for the purpose of acting upon any appropriate proposals which may be presented to it for consideration and for transmission of proposed recommendations to Federal and State agencies;
c. Serve as the regional, multi-jurisdictional organization which may be required by State or Federal law or regulation so that member agencies can continue to qualify for State and Federal funds and programs, and to review and comment on applications for Federal or State funds or programs when appropriate by law or regulation;
d. Provide assistance to member agencies to collect, analyze, and disseminate information which will be of value to member agencies, including Federal census data and information on State and Federal aid programs, and provide technical assistance as may be requested by member agencies;
e. Represent the region for transportation-related issues before State and Federal governments and vigorously express to State and Federal agencies the local government point of view on regionwide problems;
f. Develop transportation-related plans, programs and policies consistent with state and federal requirements, including coordination with local agencies; g. Facilitate cooperation and agreement between local government bodies for transportation-related issues and challenges which are common to its members; Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Agency Participation)

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Page | 4
h. Coordinate grant efforts, including applying for grants on behalf of the region, or providing technical grant support to member agencies;
i. Manage Transportation Development Act, Regional Surface Transportation, State Transportation Improvement Program, and other funds allocated at the regional level;
j. Provide funding to member agencies as sub-recipients of regional, State, and Federal funds pursuant to Sub-recipient Cooperative Agreements which outline grantor requirements associated with the fund sources provided; and k. Other duties as authorized under State and Federal law with respect to Local Transportation Commissions and Metropolitan Planning Organizations.

2. BYLAWS
The Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors maintains bylaws guiding agency procedures, functions, officer duties and membership. Amendments to all or a portion of these bylaws are made by the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors in the manner prescribed in the bylaws.

3. POWERS AND FUNCTIONS
Pursuant to the second paragraph in the recitals above, the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency has the following powers to establish and administer the agency, and in the exercise of that power, the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency is authorized in its own name to:
a. Employ an executive director as the chief administrative officer, treasurer, and secretary of the agency;
b. Employ staff and contract for professional services; c. Make and enter into contracts;
d. Acquire, hold, and convey real and personal property; e. Incur debts, obligations, and liabilities;
f. Accept contributions, grants, or loans from any public or private agency or individual, or the United States, or the State of California, or any department, instrumentally, or agency thereof, for the purpose of financing its activities; g. Invest money that is not needed for immediate necessities, as the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors determines advisable, in the same manner, and upon the same conditions as other local entities in accordance with Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Agency Participation)

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Page | 5
Section 53601 of the California Government Code;
h. Exercise the responsibility and duties required of a Local Transportation Commission and a Metropolitan Planning Organization;
i. Sue and be sued, in its own name only, but not in the name or stead of any member agency; and
j. Perform all other acts reasonable and necessary to carry out the purpose of this Agreement;
k. Other duties as may be assigned by the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors, or prescribed in the SRTA Bylaws.

4. COOPERATION
The parties to this Agreement agree to cooperate to perform the functions outlined in this agreement and assign representatives to serve on the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency.

Each representative shall act on behalf of the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency in consideration of regional challenges and opportunities, subject to any necessary and legal approvals by the legislative bodies of the member agencies. The parties recognize that the resources of the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency are limited and not all needs can be met for all areas of the region at any one time; however, the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency Board of Directors will strive for equity across all jurisdictions of the region and all populations.

Some regional opportunities and decisions may only directly benefit a particular member, but still be in the best interest of the region as a whole. A stronger region ultimately benefits all member agencies.

5. INDEMNITY
Except as may be otherwise agreed in writing between the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (“SRTA”) and member agencies, the debts, liabilities, and obligations of SRTA shall not be debts, liabilities, and obligations of the member agencies.

SRTA and the member agencies each agree to indemnify, defend, and save harmless the other and the other's officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims or losses arising out of, or in any way related to, the indemnifying party's performance under this agreement, including, but not limited to, claims for property damage, personal injury, death, and any legal expenses (such as reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, investigation costs, and experts' fees), but only in proportion to and to the extent such claims or losses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) are caused by or result from the acts or omissions of the indemnifying party, its officers, agents, or employees. A party's "performance" includes the party's action or inaction and the action or inaction of that party's officers, agents, and employees.

Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Agency Participation)

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR

SHASTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PARTICIPATION
Page | 6

6. ATTEST
County of Shasta City of Redding
______________________________ ______________________________ Chair, Board of Supervisors Mayor, City of Redding
Date: _________________________ Date: __________________________ City of Anderson City of Shasta Lake
______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor, City of Anderson Mayor, City of Shasta Lake
Date: _________________________ Date: __________________________ Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
______________________________
Chair
Date: _______________________________
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Agency Participation) Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 249
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: 10-21-21 SRTA Staff Reports (Available online) (4.11(b)--Agreement with Shasta Regional Transportation Agency for Member

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) (Schedule No. 5246), Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Magnolia Area Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project (Project):
(1) Award RFP to Ghirardelli Associates, Inc.;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract for a not-to-exceed fee of $833,254.10 with Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. to provide Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Magnolia Area Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendment increases up to $50,000.

Fiscal Impact
The consultant fee is estimated at $833,254.10 based on the scope of services as well as previous similar project cost comparisons, and the contract will be for actual work performed. However, staff recommends the approval of an additional $50,000 in contingency reserve should unforeseen project issues arise. If the reserve is needed, a contract amendment would be negotiated with the consultant and approved by the City Manager.

Funding for the Magnolia Area Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project will come from the Wastewater Utility fund, the Water Utility fund, the Storm Drain Utility fund, and the Local Streets and Roads fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to award this contract, in which case, City of Redding (City) staff would be required to manage construction management and inspection. This MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Award Request for Proposals (Schedule No. 5246); Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Magnolia Area Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project.

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 257
Report to Redding City Council January 10, 2022
Re: 4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services Page 2 would require either consultant services to be solicited for other capital work or a reduction in the City’s capital program delivery.

Background/Analysis
The Magnolia Area Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project includes replacement and repair of most of the sanitary sewer infrastructure as well as some minor storm drain and water system improvements within Placer Street, Magnolia Avenue and several adjacent streets. Sanitary sewer improvements include replacement of nearly 11,000 linear feet of existing six-inch and eight-inch diameter sanitary sewer mains, by open trench or pipe bursting methods, with replacement of sewer laterals to the right-of-way boundary and rehabilitation or replacement of sewer manholes. Approximately 600 linear feet of storm drain piping will be replaced by open trench and slipline methods, and 1,800 linear feet of Water system piping will be replaced including the associated water services and meter boxes. Once complete, the entire roadway along Placer Street will be rehabilitated with new asphalt concrete pavement and striping.

The design phase is complete and the project began advertising for construction bids on December 17, 2021. The tentative project schedule calls for construction to begin in March 2022.

Because the City’s engineering staff will be overseeing approximately 20 projects this upcoming construction season, there is insufficient staff to manage a project of this magnitude and complexity without affecting the delivery of other projects. As such, consultant support is required.

CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
In October 2021, a formal Request for Proposals (No. 5246), outlining the specific scope of work, was advertised. Proposals were required to include a scope of work and proposed fee.

Proposals and fee schedules were received on November 12, 2021, from three firms. A review and selection panel was formed with members from the Public Works Department. The panel reviewed the proposals and ranked the firms as follows:

FIRM RANK
Ghirardelli Associates, Inc.

TRC Engineers, Inc.
1 2
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. 3
Proposals were evaluated based on their understanding of the scope of work, ability to meet the proposed schedule and maintain the project budget, experience and qualifications of the proposed staff, ability to work with City staff, project approach, familiarity with State of California and City procedures, and geographic location of the team. Applying the criteria to the proposals, the selection panel determined that Ghirardelli Associates, Inc., was the best qualified firm to provide the required services for this project.

Following the evaluation and ranking, Ghirardelli Associates, Inc.’s, proposed fees were opened, evaluated, and negotiated to include reasonable costs based on the scope of services as well as previous similar project cost comparisons.

Packet Pg. 258
Report to Redding City Council January 10, 2022
Re: 4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services Page 3 A professional services agreement with Ghirardelli Associates, Inc., has been approved as to form by the City Attorney’s Office and is attached.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.
c: Josh Anthony, Construction Manager
Amber Edenburn, Purchasing Officer
Attachments
Contract
Location Map
Packet Pg. 259
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 264
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 265
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 267
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Contract (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services) Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Location Map (4.11(c)--Request for Proposals No. 5246 Construction Management Services)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept update on the City of Redding’s (City) COVID- 19 Local Economic Stimulus Package projects.

Fiscal Impact
The City Council (Council) previously approved an allocation of $9 million in Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects that reap an energy savings benefit to the City of Redding (City). To date, the City Manager has authorized purchases and projects totaling nearly $3.2 million and a consulting services agreement for engineering support for just over $1.2 million.

Alternative Action
The Council could choose not to accept the project status report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020, the Council unanimously approved the City of Redding Economic Response Plan. Included in the plan, is the allocation of $9 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for several projects (Program) associated with the Local Economic Stimulus Package that equates to a savings in energy costs for the City. On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized the City Manager to execute agreements, purchase orders, and contracts associated with the program to ensure an expedited delivery schedule. The Council also directed staff to provide regular status updates on the program and ratify all City Manager awards.

As directed by the City Manager, staff has endeavored to break up most of the work into smaller contracts, with values lower than $500,000, with the idea that local contractors and vendors will compete better due to lack of mobilization costs and other local advantages. However, the City MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 281
Report to Redding City Council January 9, 2022
Re: 4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update Page 2 has limited control because these are Public Works contracts and must be awarded to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder in accordance with State of California law.

To date, staff has awarded 14 projects totaling just under $3.2 million, including projects for lighting improvements at sport fields, the Library, the Corporation Yard, City Hall, and the Police Department, and projects to install solar power generation systems and replace roofs at various fire stations, as well as several purchase orders and on-call contract services for lighting, plumbing, mechanical work, and equipment. Seven projects have been completed, and nine of the 14 projects have been awarded to contractors with local offices.

Staff and the design consultant are finalizing bid packages for the final LED Lighting Retrofit at Various Locations Project and the Aquatic Center Pumping System Upgrades Project, and staff plans to advertise both projects for construction bids in January 2022. The design consultant is also preparing draft design packages for several heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) projects. The attached Project Status Report provides more detailed information on project status and costs. Staff will continue to return to the Council monthly to provide progress updates.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Project Status Report
05-05-20 Staff Report (available online)
04-21-20 Staff Report (available online)
Packet Pg. 282
Project # Description Project Type Contract Method
Award/PO
Date
Ratification
Date Contractor
Local Contractor,
Sub, or Supplier? Cost Est Actual Cost
$ to Local
Contractors
Estimated
Completion
Date
Acceptance
Date Project Status

PROJECTS IN CONSTRUCTION
C19-PO-01 Sourcewell purchase order for stadium lighting (Equipment Only) at Alta Mesa Park, Softball Park, South City Park, Buckeye Park, and Caldwell Park Stadium Lighting Purchase Order (Equipment Only) 7/16/2020 7/21/2020 Musco No $ 1,227,941 $ 1,227,941 $ - 2/18/2022 Purchase order with Musco for equipment.

C19-L-04 LED Lighting Retrofit at City Hall and Police Station Lighting Standard Bid 8/2/2021 8/17/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No $ 519,000 $ 144,118 $ - 2/1/2022 Construction delayed because of some long material lead times.

C19-LS-02 Installation of City purchased stadium lighting equipment at Buckeye Park and Caldwell Park
Stadium Lighting Standard Bid
(Installation Only) 2/17/2021 3/16/2021 Builders Solutions, Inc. Yes $ 341,500 $ 303,485 $ 303,485 2/1/2022 Contractor completing punch-list items.

C19-LS-01 Installation of City purchased stadium lighting equipment at Alta Mesa Park, Softball park, South City Park Kiwanis 1, and Tiger Field Stadium Lighting Standard Bid (Installation Only) 3/31/2021 4/20/2021 Builders Solutions, Inc. Yes $ 465,014 $ 463,168 $ 463,168 2/18/2022 Construction in progress. All fields except Tiger Field complete.

C19-S-01 Solar PV at Fire Stations 7 & 8 Solar Standard Bid 9/29/2021 10/19/2021 B & B Solar Inc. Yes $ 100,529 $ 98,900 $ 98,900 2/20/2022 Construction starting.

C19-S-02 Solar PV & Replace Roofs at Various Fire Stations (Stations 2, 4, 5, and 6) Solar Standard Bid 11/23/2021 12/21/2021 Harbert Roofing, Inc. Yes $ 525,610 $ 426,213 $ 426,213 5/1/2022 Construction starting.

C19-L-06 LED Lighting Retrofit at Civic Center Auditorium Lighting Standard Bid 11/23/2021 12/21/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No $ 162,111 $ 77,387 $ - 2/1/2022 Construction starting.

PROJECTS IN DESIGN
C19-L-05 LED Lighting Retrofit at Caldwell Park, Fire Stations, MLK Jr Center, Enterprise Park, Old City Hall, Senior Citizens Hall, Soccer Park, and Aquatic Center.

Lighting Standard Bid $ 616,761 4/15/2022 Jacobs finalizing bid package.

C19-M-03 Upgrade HVAC at City Hall & Police Department HVAC Standard Bid $ 888,430 5/31/2022 Jacobs preparing design package.

C19-M-04 Upgrade HVAC at Caldwell Park Rec Center and Enterprise Park Community Room HVAC Standard Bid $ 171,000 6/15/2022 City will work with on-call contractor for improvements.

C19-M-05 Upgrade HVAC at Corp Yard HVAC Standard Bid $ 195,000 7/3/2022 Jacobs preparing design package.

C19-P-03 Upgrade Pumping Control System at the Aquatic Center Plumbing Standard Bid $ 132,239 4/1/2022 Jacobs preparing bid package.

C19-S-03 Solar PV & Replace Roofs - Fire Stations 1 and 3 Solar Standard Bid $ 250,000 TBD Structural design and improvements needed for addition of solar equipment. Staff evaluating cost to benefit.

C19-W-04 Replace Windows at Fire Stations 1 through 6 Windows Standard Bid TBD 5/31/2022 City staff is preparing design package in-house.

C19-M-06 Replace HVAC at Civic Center Auditorium HVAC Standard Bid $ 3,500,000 TBD Design on hold until City can determine if budget will be available.

C19-S-04 Install Solar and Replace Roof at Civic Center Auditorium Solar Standard Bid $ 1,600,000 TBD Design on hold until City can determine if budget will be available.

PROJECTS COMPLETE
C19-L-01 LED Lighting Retrofit at three Non Profit Buildings at Diestelhorst Landing. Lighting On-Call Contract 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 B&C Yes $ 48,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 7/9/2020 7/31/2020 Construction completed.

C19-L-02 LED Lighting Retrofit at Library Lighting Standard Bid 11/19/2020 12/15/2020 Clear Blue Energy Corp. No $ 194,263 $ 53,633 $ - 3/1/2021 2/22/2021 Construction completed.

C19-L-03 LED Lighting Retrofit at Corp Yard Lighting Standard Bid 12/15/2020 1/19/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No $ 391,117 $ 143,650 $ - 6/22/2021 8/6/2021 Construction completed.

C19-P-01 Replace Water Heaters in Fire Stations 2, 3, 4, and 6 Plumbing On-Call Contract 6/30/2020 7/21/2020 American Leak Detection Yes $ 49,000 $ 13,050 $ 13,050 9/16/2020 10/2/2020 Construction completed.

C19-P-02 Replace Laundry Facilities in Fire Stations 2, 3, 5, 7, and 8 Plumbing On-Call Contract 6/25/2020 7/21/2020 American Leak Detection Yes $ 17,000 $ 12,759 $ 12,759 9/16/2020 10/2/2020 Construction completed.

C19-M-01 Replace HVAC Units in Fire Stations 1,2,4,6 HVAC On-Call Contract 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 ACCO Yes $ 92,109 $ 95,278 $ 95,278 12/1/2020 11/30/2020 Construction completed.

C19-M-02 Replace HVAC Units in Old City Hall HVAC On-Call Contract 6/15/2020 7/21/2020 ACCO Yes $ 135,755 $ 97,985 $ 97,985 1/20/2021 1/13/2021 Construction completed.

Sub Total: $ 11,622,379 $ 3,170,566 $ 1,523,838

PROJECT MANAGEMENT/DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES C-19-DC-01 Project Management, Design and Construction Services Engineering Consultant PSA 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 Jacobs Engineering Yes $ 1,240,816 On-going design and construction management services Total $ 12,863,195 $ 3,170,566 $ 1,523,838
Project Budget $9 M. Projects will be prioritized and delivered to fit within approved budget
Energy Efficiency Economic Response Plan (EEERP) Project Status Report Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Project Status Report (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager to award any public works contract, purchase order, or agreements, of any value, associated with the $9.5 million GHG funding approved as part of the Local Economic Stimulus Package.

Fiscal Impact
The City Council has previously approved the allocation of $9.5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects that reap an energy savings benefit to the City of Redding. There is no further fiscal impact to granting authority to the City Manager to execute the agreements, purchase orders, and contracts associated with these projects. There may, however, be an added benefit of seeing the money infused more rapidly into the local economy.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements, purchase orders, or contracts associated with the Cap and Trade distribution funds to expedite delivery of the work. This would lengthen the process to use the authorized funding.

Background/Analysis
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020, the City Council unanimously approved the Economic Response Plan. Included in the plan is the allocation of $9.5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects associated with the Local Economic Stimulus Package that equate to a savings in energy costs for the City of Redding. By authorizing the City Manager to negotiate, execute, and direct the agreements, purchase orders and contracts, staff can proceed with rapidly assigning the work and awarding bids. The benefit to this is being able to see the Cap and Trade action proceeds go to work as soon as possible in the community, and thereby providing the local MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider authorizing the City Manager to award energy savings contracts, purchase orders, and agreements related to the Green House Gas (GHG) funding approved by the City Council as part of the Local Economic Stimulus.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: 05-05-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Authorize City Manager to award energy savings contracts Page 2 economy a direct opportunity to see a quick positive impact to jobs and business activity. The projects within the package may include, , LED light replacement in City facilities, reroofing and some solar installation at Fire Stations, replacing largely older and heavy energy using equipment with newer more efficient equipment, and additional energy saving projects to be determined
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
 Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
 Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”  Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
 Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
 Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: 05-05-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the City of Redding Economic Response Plan and provide direction to staff as follows:
(1) Approve deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) hotels and motels. (2) Approve modification of existing Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) guidelines.
(3) Approve modification of amortization policy for City of Redding utility bills. (4) Approve the refund of all City of Redding utility deposits. (5) Rescind approval of allocation of Cap and Trade funds for the Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification programs; approve Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be distributed to electric customers; and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 32nd Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 to appropriate a total of $9 million in Greenhouse Gas allotment for utility rebates. (6) Approve adoption of a utility grant program for small businesses utilizing $600,000 of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding.
(7) Economic Stimulus Package
a. Approve additional use of $5 million of Greenhouse Gas allotment and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 33rd Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 allocating money for projects designated as providing energy savings for the general fund.
b. Provide direction on projects involving utilities funding and borrowing.

Fiscal Impact
The amount of impact of this proposal depends on the City Council’s (Council) direction for staff. The programs implemented thus far are expected to impact the General Fund due to approximately $500,000 in missed revenue projections. Programs such as modifying the Amortization Program guidelines and deferring Transient Occupancy Tax will reduce reserves in the short term by providing cash flow relief to businesses. Using restricted revenue funds to modify existing CARES program guidelines, and also refunding City of Redding utility deposits MEETING DATE: April 21, 2020
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider Economic Response Plan related to the Covid-19 pandemic's impact on the City and provide direction regarding mitigation measures.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 16, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Economic Response Plan Page 2
and creating a utility grant program for small business will not impact unrestricted reserves. If the additional utility credit is approved, $9 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds would need to be allocated, some of which would be reallocated from previously funded projects, to bring the total allocation to $11 million for utility rebates. To complete projects listed in the Local Economic Stimulus Package, $5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds would need to be allocated in addition to the $4 million already allocated. The Council could also, through approval of this report, provide direction and identify an amount of money to reserve to pay for any potential borrowing for projects that would be approved through the Local Economic Stimulus Package.

Alternative Action
The Council has multiple options with this report. If it chooses to not accept the report in its entirety, all currently implemented programs would cease and no additional community assistance programming would take place at this time. The Council could choose to accept the report, and therefore all of the currently implemented projects as well, and provide direction to staff regarding which new projects to move forward.

Background/Analysis
The Covid-19 global pandemic has been a health catastrophe causing significant disruption in individual, community and societal norms while devastating the economy. The City of Redding, as the local governmental entity, needs to take bold action in line with the State and Federal Government to not only protect the health and welfare of the individual but also of the economy.

The City of Redding City Council will be presented with a number of proposed initiatives and projects to help individuals and businesses through this difficult time. The attached City of Redding Economic Response Plan is a report detailing programming currently implemented, as well as programming that could be implemented to assist the community. These items are varied in cost and source of funding.

Currently implementing
 Maintain City services
 Suspend Return to Owner fees for impounded animals
 Suspend late fees and interest on payments due to the City of Redding  Suspend City of Redding utility shut-offs due to non-payment  Suspend City of Redding utility payment late fees
 Cap and Trade distribution of $50 to every Redding Electric Utility (REU) account holder
Pending approval
 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax payment from hotel and motel businesses  Modify existing –Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) program guidelines to provide opportunity for additional financial assistance to qualifying utility customers
 Modify Utilities Amortization program guidelines to extend the amortization period, and extend the program to commercial customers
 Refund City of Redding utility deposits to residential and commercial customers  Additional Cap and Trade distribution of $200 to every REU account holder  Utility grant program for small businesses
 Local Economic Stimulus Package containing multiple projects that will result in local contract work opportunities and energy savings to the City of Redding Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 16, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Economic Response Plan Page 3
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
 Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
 Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”  Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
 Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
 Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution - GHG Customer Distribution
Resolution - Green House Gas Allotment
COR Economic Response Plan 2020
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Resolution No. 2020 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 32ND AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2019-050 RESCINDING

APPROVAL OF ALLOCATION OF CAP AND TRADE FUNDS FOR THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION AND BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAMS; APPROVE THE APPROPRIATION OF $9,000,000 OF CAP AND TRADE AUCTION PROCEEDS TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO RATEPAYERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-20.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
142 854 GHG Customer Distribution $9,000,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease in Beginning Balance
142-851-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance $ 1,077,910
Decrease in Cap and Trade Revenues
142-851-01-4400-01 Environmental Attributes $ 2,022,090 Elimination of Building Electrification Project
142-854-8908-98 Building Electrification $ 4,000,000
Elimination of Wildfire Mitigation Project
142-854-8908-99 Wildfire Mitigation $ 1,900,000
Increase in GHG Customer Distribution
142-854-8908-90 GHG Customer Distribution $ 9,000,000
Total $ 9,000,000 $ 9,000,000
THAT the purpose is to rescind approval of allocation of Cap and Trade funds for the Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification programs; approve the appropriation of $9,000,000 of Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be distributed to ratepayers for fiscal year 2019-20.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of April, 2020 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Resolution No. 2020 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 33RD AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2019-050 APPROVE AND APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL USE OF $5,000,000 OF GREENHOUSE GAS

ALLOTMENT FOR PROJECTS DESIGNED AS PROVIDING ENERGY SAVINGS FOR THE GENERAL FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-20.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
142 854 Energy Efficiency Measures $5,000,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease in Beginning Balance
142-851-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance $ 5,000,000
Increase in Energy Efficiency Measures
142-854-8908-96 Energy Efficiency Measures $ 5,000,000
Total $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000
THAT the purpose is to approve and appropriate additional use of $5,000,000 of Greenhouse Gas allotment allocating money for projects designed as providing energy savings for the General Fund for fiscal year 2019-20.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of April, 2020 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
1 Table of Contents
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................2 Plan Elements................................................................................................................................................2 Elements currently implemented .............................................................................................................2 Maintain City Services..........................................................................................................................2 Suspend Return to Owner fees............................................................................................................3 Suspend Late Fees and Interest on City Payments .............................................................................3 Suspend Utility Shut-Off ......................................................................................................................4 Suspend Utility Late Fees.....................................................................................................................4 Distribution of $50 to REU Account Holders.......................................................................................4 Pending the City Council’s approval .........................................................................................................4 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax...................................................................................................5 Modify Existing CARES Program Guidelines........................................................................................5 Modify Utilities Amortization Program Guidelines.............................................................................5 Refund City of Redding Utilities Deposits............................................................................................6 Additional Cap and Trade Distribution................................................................................................6 Utility Grant Program for Small Businesses ........................................................................................6 Local Economic Stimulus Package........................................................................................................7 Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
2 Executive Summary
The Covid-19 global pandemic is a health catastrophe causing significant disruption in individual, community and societal norms. While the direct human suffering owed to the disease itself is horrific, the damage to the economy due to necessary health precautions is equally devastating. The City of Redding (City), as the local governmental entity, needs to take bold action in line with the State and Federal Government to not only protect the health and welfare of the individual but also that of the local economy. The City of Redding City Council (Council) has directed that a plan be developed to assist the community in economic recovery to coincide with the cessation of the pandemic. This report provides detailed information on the various programs that have been developed to help foster the economy through this economic disaster.

Some programs have already been implemented while others still need final approval from the City Council. In brief, the programs are listed below.

Currently implement Plan Element Value
Suspend Return to Owner fees $200
Suspend late fees and interest on City of
Redding payments
$60,000
Suspend City of Redding utility shut-offs Increased Cash Flow Suspend City of Redding utility late fees $425,000
Distribution of $50 to REU account holders $2,200,000
Plan Element Pending approval
Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax $250,000 Est. deferred Modify existing CARES program guidelines $1,500,000
Modify existing Utilities amortization
program guidelines
Increased Cash Flow
Refund City of Redding utility deposits $3,400,000
Additional Cap and Trade distribution $9,000,000
Utility grant program for small businesses $600,000
Local Economic Stimulus Package $20,000,000
Total Value of City Response Plan Est @ $37,500,000
Plan Elements
Elements currently implemented
Maintain City Services
City services provided to the community are critical in nature and are unable to cease in functionality. A multitude of projects, already in the works, have to continue processing in spite of the pandemic that has affected the nation. In order to keep projects moving forward, and to Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
3 continue to serve the community in this critical capacity, City departments implemented immediate changes to comply with State and Federal directives. Personnel able to work from home were provided resources to do so. Meetings of large groups of staff and/or the public were eliminated, and preparations were made to provide access to public meetings without further endangering the community. As a result of the rapid response of staff, City services continue to function for the bulk of the community. In spite of the closure of City Hall and the diminished personnel in the Avtech and Corp Yard buildings, and the Transfer Station, critical City services such as police, fire, electric, solid waste removal, water and wastewater maintenance, and parks services still operate to the benefit of the community. Each position, whether working from home or in the office, is a critical component of maintaining the support of these services. Department directors monitor work product and load to ensure the City continues to function efficiently. The City is providing increased availability of cleaning supplies and sanitizing materials to offices and meeting spaces to maintain worker health.

To provide additional relief to residents and business owners, several programming decisions were implemented. Taking into consideration the varied economic status of Redding residents and businesses, the following steps were taken to provide some help financially.

Suspend Return to Owner fees
Effective March 23, 2020, Haven Humane Society suspended the charging of return to owner fees for animals impounded for running at large. A small portion of the fee is typically returned to the City to recoup costs of providing animal regulation services for the community. The total cost is expected to be less than $200 for the City. This allows Haven to reduce the number of animals left in the shelter while it is being operated at minimum capacity, and it is a benefit for community members who are unable to make the payment at this time.

Suspend Late Fees and Interest on City Payments
The City has initiated the suspension of late fees and penalties for payments and all General Accounts Receivable for items like hangar rents and imposed fines. This is made possible through individual review of accounts as payments are submitted and the reporting is analyzed. Both systems are housed in the legacy system so adjustments are applied manually to individual accounts. The $35 returned check and returned ACH payment fees have been suspended as well. Returned check and ACH fees are charged on an individual basis, and returned items are reported from the City’s banking system daily. When applicable, the returned item amount with the additional fee are typically charged back to established accounts. The fee will be eliminated from these charge backs.

The current plan is to suspend penalties and interest for receivables due in March and April 2020, which would include payments due in April and May. Based on last year’s activities, it is estimated that the loss of revenue to the general fund from the suspensions will be $55,000. The suspension of the returned check and ACH fees is estimated to be $5,000 for the same time period. If extended an additional month through the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2020), the savings to the community equates to an estimated $60,000 which will result in an equal amount of lost revenue for the City.

Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
4 Suspend Utility Shut-Off
Effective March 18, 2020, the City of Redding Utilities Customer Service suspended the practice of utility shut-offs due to non-payment. Each month, under normal circumstances, approximately 220 utility accounts are disconnected after failure to pay for utility service received over the previous 60 days. Typically, 75 percent of these customers pay their past due amount and have their utilities reconnected within two weeks. With the Covid-19 pandemic and the anticipated increase in the number of utility customers having difficulty keeping up with all of their monthly expenses, it was decided that loss of utility service should not contribute to the stress and anxiety already experienced. Once the pandemic has passed, the Customer Services division will work with customers using various tools to bring the accounts into good standing. It is known that this effort will result in a temporary increase in accounts receivable and decreased cash flow for all utilities – resulting in an equal amount of temporary financial relief to residents of the City of Redding. This measure may result in an increase in bad debt expense, however, additional proposed measures, listed later in this report, could assist in reducing bad debt expense.

Furthermore, bad debt would be sent to a collection agency with a recovery rate of approximately 30 percent.

Suspend Utility Late Fees
Like shut-offs, late fees for utility payments have been suspended. Late fees, historically, amount to $1.7 million per year. While late fee collections are not always linear, it is a close approximation that the suspension will save customers in excess of $425,000 due to the high potential that there will be an increase in late payments. Late fees are an administrative penalty, and therefore, are deposited in the General Fund. If it is assumed that there will be no attempt to collect the past-due late fees, the General Fund will miss revenue projections in this category by at least $425,000.

Distribution of $50 to REU Account Holders
The City Council approved the distribution of excess reserves to be credited to every Redding Electric Utility customer in December 2019 in the amount of $50 per account. The funding source for the distribution is the Greenhouse Gas Allowance Auction Proceeds (also referred to as GHG or Cap and Trade), in an amount equal to about $2.2 million, and will be accomplished via a bill credit.

Pending the City Council’s approval
The following programming ideas were developed to provide additional options to provide financial relief to residents and businesses. These plan elements vary in how they target a diverse set of community members. Reaching as much of the community as possible is crucial for Redding to solidify its economic foundation. These proposals require the City Council’s approval to proceed. Some of the following items can be implemented immediately, while others will need to be further developed and brought back to the Council for further direction.

Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
5 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax
Defer payment of TOT from hotel and motel business until August 1, 2020 (payment due August 19, 2020). This deferral would be interest free and full payback would be made by November 1, 2020. The TOT deferral program could provide for much need cash flow for the Hotel and Motel industry by allowing an estimated $250,000 to remain with the business for operating expense. This program would be limited to Hotels/Motels with Business Licenses of 65-40-1 or 65-50-1.

Modify Existing CARES Program Guidelines
Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) provides up to $300 of emergency assistance for the electric portion of bills for City of Redding utility customers. The intent of the CARES program is to help customers who have suffered a temporary financial hardship and to bring their account to a current status. Customers are eligible for CARES assistance once every 12 months. This program is funded out of the Public Benefits charges included in each ratepayers’ bill. Staff recommends applying a $300 CARES credit to all residential customers enrolled in the Residential Energy Discount Program (REU’s low income program). This would provide $1.2 million of immediate utility cost relief to our lowest-income customers with an additional $600,000 of additional relief available to those who may apply due to becoming eligible due to impacts from covid-19. These funds would be replenished with the new budget year beginning on July 1, 2020. Should the Council choose to do this, staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director authority to repeat this process, should the Stay at Home order continue through the summer, and also suspend the once-per-year limitation for applicants. This would have no impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414, as Public Benefit Programs are restricted.

Modify Utilities Amortization Program Guidelines
The City of Redding Utilities Customer Service provides amortization for residential customer bills that are past due. This allows customers to “catch-up” on their bill for up to 12 months by amortizing the past-due balance. Staff recommends temporarily expanding this to commercial customers and temporarily extending the amortization for a period of up to 24 months, which would essentially provide a zero percent loan to customers that are past-due and having trouble paying their bill. In addition, this would allow commercial customers who receive Small Business Administration Loans to focus on other essential costs. This would have a temporary impact on City of Redding Utilities, as cash would not be received for up to two years. The risk to the utilities would be any eventual non-performance of these loans; non-performance would mean not paying the full amortization over the 24-month period. Therefore, staff recommends establishing an “eligibility criteria” that the customer must have not been disconnected for nonpayment of utilities in the previous year to be automatically approved for the amortization.

Customers not eligible for automatic amortization may still request it and approval will be granted on a case by case basis. Should the Council choose to do this, Staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director administrative authority to modify program elements as necessary. As this could affect water, wastewater, and solid waste utilities, the Public Works Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
6 Director would collaborate in these decisions. This plan element will potentially provide millions of dollars in available cash flow for residents and businesses.

Refund City of Redding Utilities Deposits
Staff recommends returning all customer deposits held by Utilities Customer Services. This would return approximately $3.4 million to customers, including approximately $600,000 to commercial customers. The City holds utility deposits on customer accounts that present a higher credit risk to the utilities. By returning deposits, the City is returning monies to customers most in need. This would have no immediate impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414 as customer deposits are not included in unrestricted reserves for the purpose of calculating days of cash on hand. The risk to the utilities would be future bad debt accruals of non-payment of utilities by customers who have demonstrated difficulty paying bills.

However, this bad debt would be sent to a collection agency with a recovery rate of approximately 30 percent. Should the Council choose to do this, Staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director authority to modify administrative processes for billing future utility deposits as defined in City Council Policy 1404. The deposit requirement will be reinstated at an unknown time in the future.

Additional Cap and Trade Distribution
Staff recommends a $200 credit on Electric utility bills to all customers out of Cap and Trade auction proceeds, which is similar to the $50 refund recently approved by Council. This would provide an additional $9 million in rebates to electric utility customers, bringing the total rebate amount, including the Council’s action on March 26, 2020, to approximately $11 million. To fund this program, the Council would need to allocate the balance of current year Cap and Trade revenues and cancel two Council-approved programs that have yet to launch: Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification. Wildfire Mitigation has yet to start due to the California Air Resources Board not providing a quantification methodology for reduced greenhouse gasses achieved through fuels reduction, thus the Cap and Trade funds are not available for this purpose. Building Electrification has yet to start due to staffing limitations. This would have no impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414 as Cap and Trade revenues are restricted.

Utility Grant Program for Small Businesses
As an entitlement city for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) the City receives an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant funding which is used for public service and public improvements. Due to the Federal CARES act the City received an additional allocation of $447,450. This funding, combined with unused funding from past projects, for a total of $600,000 provides the City an opportunity to provide funding toward eligible small business utility payments for those in the most need or are unable to receive Federal assistance or grants. If approved, staff will present the program and the amount available as part of the required public hearing to approve the use of the funding.

Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
7 Local Economic Stimulus Package
The Local Economic Stimulus Package is composed of multi-departmental projects intended to result in a combination of benefits to the City. In its infancy, this was a mass project designed to create an energy savings with each completed project. The City, however, has multiple deferred maintenance projects that must be completed to maintain the infrastructure stability of its assets.

Staff developed the following plan in a response to a need to merge the energy savings needs of the City with its deferred maintenance needs and infuse much needed capital into the local economy.

The projects in this package were specifically chosen as critical needs either in the realm of energy savings, which qualifies the project to be paid for through GHG auction proceeds, or for its contribution to eliminating the deferred maintenance needs of the City. A combination of GHG funding, utility reserves, municipal bond, and energy cost savings would be used to fund the package with little or no net budgetary impact to the General Fund. The total value of the economic stimulus package is estimated at approximately $20 million. Approximately $9.5 million of GHG money could be allocated for the completion of the projects that realize an energy savings for the City. The energy savings over time for the General Fund could be used to fund the deferred maintenance needs.

Several of the anticipated projects such as the work at various fire stations and lighting upgrades would be started immediately and put out to bid as soon as possible. Other projects, such as the replacement of the heating and air conditioning system at the Civic Auditorium will need to be analyzed further. The intent is to move quickly to infuse available GHG funds and provide economic benefit for the community.

The calculated energy savings from the energy savings projects could be used to secure bond funding to accelerate up to another $10 million in local projects including improvements to the Redding Aquatic Center, park facilities, required building maintenance, and other amenities.

Staff will return to the City Council with a full project list and borrowing options should the City Council provide direction to do so.

Completion of projects totaling up to $20 million is quite a large endeavor. However, the plan would be to bid multiple smaller projects to provide the best opportunity for local contractors to participate in the process, and thereby providing the local economy a direct opportunity to see quick and significant economic benefit in jobs and business activity. According to multipliers provided by the Shasta County Economic Development Corporation, the City of Redding would see a direct benefit equal to 328 jobs and $30 million of economic impact.

Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: 04-21-20 Staff Report (available online) (4.11(d)--COVID Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposal (RFP) Schedule No. 5259, Food, Beverage, and Gift Concession Agreement and Permit for Commercial Activities at the Redding Municipal Airport:
(1) Award to Theory Coffee Roasters;
(2) Approve and authorize the execution of the agreement for a five-year term effective February 1, 2022, through January 31, 2027, with two one-year options to unilaterally extend the term.

Fiscal Impact
Redding Municipal Airport (Airport) is contracted to receive revenue from the food, beverage, and gift concessions totaling the greater of $2,000 per month or 10 percent of gross receipts for the term of the agreement beginning February 1, 2024. This minimum monthly guarantee amount is abated for the first twenty-four (24) months, or a total not to exceed amount of $39,000 dollars, as an offset to the significant capital investment required. Based on projections provided in the proposal, the City should receive at least $3,800 monthly after the abatement period concludes.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to not approve the agreement. Existing food and beverage services would continue to be provided by Airport staff, and any future food, beverage, and gift concessions would require a new Request for Proposals (RFP) process.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposals (Schedule No. 5259) Food, Beverage, and Gift Concession Agreement with Theory Coffee Roasters at the Redding Municipal Airport and Authorize Mayor to sign contract
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 300
Report to Redding City Council January 12, 2022
Re: 4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport Page 2 Background/Analysis
In early 2017, the Airport began providing food and beverage service by means of vending machines located in the Airport Terminal as a service to the traveling public. Over the last four years, the Airport purchased four vending machines: one Keurig coffee vending machine, two snack vending machines and one cold beverage machine. Over the last couple of years, the Airport has experienced exponential growth in air service with the addition of two new air carriers, Alaska Airlines and Avelo Airlines. Airport staff no longer has sufficient time to support the vending operation and all of its demands. As such, staff prepared and issued an RFP for Food, Beverage, and Gift concessions at the Airport on November 8, 2021. One Proposal was received from locally owned and operated Theory Coffee Roasters.

Theory Coffee Roasters (Theory) has operated at multiple locations in the City for the past five years, and has won awards for its coffee. The core mission is “to source, roast, and serve world class coffees in a friendly manner,” and at the core of its company’s values is customer service and valuing “quality over convenience.” Theory’s proposal includes not only taking over the operation of the existing vending machines but also development and buildout of a full-service coffee shop in the passenger hold room. The proposal included service beyond what was solicited in the RFP. Theory plans to offer grab and go food items (small menu) and locally sourced gifts in addition to coffee service. This will provide a valuable service to the community and enhance the traveling experience.

In order to conduct coffee operations in the Terminal, significant capital expense in excess of $120,000 is necessary to provide the utility and tenant improvements. The proposal requested early offsets and financial assistance from the Airport to cover a portion of the cost associated with the upgrades and to cover permitting to make this endeavor feasible. With the lack of necessary utility infrastructure, and in consideration of the risks associated with the pandemic, staff negotiated the reduction of the required minimum monthly payments up front in order to mitigate costs associated with establishing Theory’s services in the Terminal. Under the proposed terms, Theory will complete the necessary improvements and associated permitting, and the Airport will abate minimum payments for a total not to exceed amount of $39,000 and the term of the agreement will be initially 5-years with two, one-year optional term extensions.

All fixed infrastructure improvements will be turned over to the Airport at the end of the term.

The agreement has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Agreement (Available online)
Packet Pg. 301
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport)

EXHIBIT A
AIRPORT TERMINAL SITE A – “LOBBY”
Site A
“Vending Machines”
Approx. 33 sq ft.

Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport) EXHIBIT A (Continued)

AIRPORT TERMINAL
SITE B – “PASSENGER HOLD ROOM AREA”
Site B-1
“Buildout”
Approx. 130 sq ft.

Operator shall have
limited access to
closet for plumbing
needs. City shall
retain access to
closet at all times.

Site B-2
“Vending Machines”
Approx. 28 sq ft.

Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport)

EXHIBIT B

REDDING AIRPORT CONCESSION

MONTHLY CERTIFIED ACTIVITY REPORT
Operator name:

Activity period: to 202
Total transactions for reporting month: ____________________________ Total gross receipts for reporting period: $____________________________ $______________________ x __________% = $____________________________ Monthly gross receipts percentage percentage of gross receipts Minimum monthly guarantee: $____________________________

PAY THE MINIMUM MONTHLY GUARANTEE OR THE PERCENTAGE OF GROSS RECEIPTS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.

Due on 20th of each month: $____________________________ I hereby certify that the above is a true statement from the records of:

Business:

Preparer’s signature:

Print Name and Title:

Date prepared:

Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Agreement (Available online) (4.11(e)--Award RFP 5259 Concessions-Municipal Airport)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the improvements in Salt Creek Heights Subdivision – Unit 2, Phase 1 (S-15-07/PD-11- 07) as satisfactorily complete; and adopt Resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation.

Fiscal Impact
There will be cumulative impacts to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphalt pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in State of California gas-tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utility costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the storm-drain utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The stormdrain utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the City would be inconsistent with a long-standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City standards.

Background/Analysis
The developer, Sierra Pacific Industries, has satisfactorily completed the installation of all improvements in Unit 2 – Phase 1 of the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision, (S-15-07/PD-11-07).

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(f)--Accept Improvements and Adopt Resolution Accepting Streets in the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision - Unit 2 - Phase 1 (S-15-07/PD-11-07) Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 329
Report to Redding City Council January 9, 2022
Re: 4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Subdivision - Unit 2 - Phase 1 Page 2 The subdivision is located west of Buenaventura Boulevard and north of Eureka Way. A map showing the location of the subdivision is attached.

The Salt Creek Heights Subdivision – Unit 2, Phase 1 (S-15-07/PD-11-07) was approved by the Planning Commission on June 3, 2010, and all conditions of the map have been fulfilled. The final map for the subdivision was approved by the Council on December 4, 2018. All improvements have been satisfactorily completed, and all required fees have been paid. This subdivision was also required to form a landscape maintenance district, which has been formed.

The developer has completed all the conditioned improvements for the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision – Unit 2, Phase 1, (S-15-07/PD-11-07). It is prudent to accept the improvements and adopt a resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation. The developer has requested the City retain the existing performance security through the warranty period.

The resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Resolution
Location Map
Packet Pg. 330
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ACCEPTING FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION THE STREETS
IN SALT CREEK SUBDIVISION, UNIT 2, PHASE 1, S-15-07/PD-11-07 WHEREAS, improvements have been satisfactorily completed in Salt Creek Subdivision, Unit 2, Phase 1, S-15-07/PD-11-07; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the streets in Salt Creek Subdivision, Unit 2, Phase 1, S-15-07/PD-11-07, be accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council, pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1806 of the California Streets and Highways Code, that the streets in Salt Creek Subdivision, Unit 2, Phase 1, S-15-07/PD-11-07 as shown on the map attached and incorporated herein – are accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 18th day of January, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Resolution (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Subdivision - Unit 2 - Phase 1) Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Location Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Subdivision - Unit 2 - Phase 1)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint Peter Figura to the Administrative Hearings Board to serve an additional four-year term effective February 1, 2022, and expiring January 31, 2026.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the Mayor’s recommendation.

Background/Analysis
Board Member Peter Figura’s term expires on January 31, 2022; therefore, one scheduled vacancy exists. Mr. Figura has expressed interest in continuing to serve on the Administrative Hearings Board. If approved, his new term will begin February 1, 2022, and end January 31, 2026.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 5.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 5.1--Consider reappointment to the Administrative Hearings Board.

Packet Pg. 333

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Reconvene the public hearing opened at the City Council Meeting of December 7, 2021, and continued on December 21, 2021, and upon conclusion:
(1) Adopt Resolution: (a) adopting the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan; (b) adopting the addendum to the mitigated negative declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map; (c) adopting amendments to Redding’s General Plan (General Plan Amendment Application GPA2021-00449); and (d) amending the City of Redding Schedule of Fees and Service Charges;
(2) Offer Ordinance for first reading by title only and waive the full reading: (a) adopting the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan; (b) adopting the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map; (c) adopting the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update (Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361); (d) approving amendments to Redding Zoning Map (Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450); (e) making findings in support of a general plan consistency determination; and direct the City Attorney to prepare a summary ordinance, and authorize the City Clerk to publish the summary ordinance according to law; and
(3) Find that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan and the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map are adequate to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, and the necessary findings for approval are in evidence.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of the proposed General Plan amendment, rezoning, and specific plan amendment applications would not result in any fiscal impacts to the City of Redding (City). The proposed MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 6.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing to consider General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Specific Plan Amendment Applications; and the Resolution and Ordinance associated with the adoption of the proposed Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update.

Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Packet Pg. 334
Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 2 Development Services pre-application review fee of $400 will be used to offset a portion of the cost of providing a pre-application review.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to not approve the General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449, Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450, or Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361. The adopted Downtown Redding Specific Plan would remain in effect.

The Council could also choose to direct staff to modify the Draft Specific Plan update for future consideration, not approve the Development Services fee for pre-application review, and/or provide alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The public hearing was opened on December 7, 2021, and due to an administrative error, the hearing was continued to the next regular scheduled meeting on December 21 to comply with required noticing regulations. At the December 21, 2021, Council meeting, following staff’s presentation, the public hearing was re-opened, related testimony heard, and the Council then voted to continue the public hearing to January 18, 2022, to allow for additional time to clarify information from staff and take additional comments from residents.

The Downtown Redding Specific Plan was originally adopted in 2001 and amended in 2010 and in 2018. The 2018 update involved numerous stakeholders, community members, the Redding Planning Commission, and the Council. Meetings and workshops were held in order to present information and preliminary proposals and to solicit input and feedback pertinent to the formulation of the update.

The vision of the 2018 update was to create a revitalized downtown space in Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of historical and natural resources, with a lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-accessible shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities, and is inviting to residents and visitors alike. The 2018 update reduced the Specific Plan area boundary, changed the zoning and general plan land use classification of certain properties, and modified the land use regulations, development standards, parking requirements, design standards and guidelines, implementation action plan, and other various provisions of the Specific Plan.

As a result of the 2018 update, Downtown Redding has experienced a tremendous resurgence.

Through public-private partnerships, the downtown space is being revitalized. The reopening of streets to the core allows access to vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists. The physical landscape is changing with the introduction of 200 new residential units, new commercial and retail properties, new parking options, and through the renovation of existing buildings. In short, the vision of the 2018 update is being fulfilled.

Implementation of the Specific Plan was challenging the past three years; requiring staff to apply new regulations, building standards, and guidelines, and to also streamline the development review and entitlement process. Throughout, it has been clear that the regulations would need further refinement to continue the revitalization of Downtown Redding and to further foster greater economic development and opportunities in the City’s core.

Packet Pg. 335
Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 3 Staff held two stakeholder meetings earlier this year to gather input from interested stakeholders located in the downtown core to ensure desired elements are included in the development of alternatives and proposed changes. Additionally, staff held a neighborhood informational meeting with the Garden Tract Neighborhood on October 19, 2021, to further gather input.

The Draft Specific Plan update would expand the Specific Plan area boundary; change the zoning and general plan land use classification of the expansion area; and modify the land use regulations, development standards, and other various provisions of the Specific Plan.

The Redding Planning Commission (Commission) held a public hearing at its regularly scheduled meeting of October 26, 2021. The main issues discussed at the Commission meeting were the impact of the height of future buildings to adjacent residential properties, the type of discretionary permit required, and the boundary expansion area. Staff recommended a directorlevel approval site development permit be required for: (1) uses that currently require a use permit; or (2) any uses, including those that are currently outright permitted without a discretionary permit, where development of those uses would be better served with a discretionary permit (i.e. mixed-use developments in the Downtown Core District). The Commission determined that the public would be better served by participating in a discretionary process that requires a public hearing for these decisions. The Commission voted unanimously, 4-0, recommending that the Council approve the Draft Specific Plan and do the following: (1) reduce the maximum height on those properties adjacent to a single-family residential district to 35 feet; (2) require Board of Administrative Review level approval for a site development permit rather than a director-level approval site development permit; and (3) exclude the properties east of Sequoia Street from the Specific Plan boundary expansion. Staff supports the Commission’s recommendations to the Council.

Issues
Proposed changes to the Chapter 6, Regulations, Standards, and Guidelines.

Listed below is a summary of the proposed changes:
• All new developments, including additions, will require a pre-application process, subject to a $400 administrative fee, through the Planning Division to assist in identifying any potential matters prior to submitting for building permits. • Require a site development permit rather than a use permit for the following uses:

Packet Pg. 336
Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 4 Land Use Core
District
Mixed-Use
District
Multiple-Family Residential X
College and Trade Schools on the ground floor X
Government Offices on the ground floor X
Clinics on the ground floor X
Clubs and Lodges X
Religious Facilities on the ground floor X
Parking Structures X
Residential Care X X
Convenience Gas Marts X
Banks with Drive-Throughs X
Automobile Rentals X
Automobile Washing X
Laboratories on the ground floor X
Business Services on the ground floor X
Maintenance and Repair Services on the ground floor X
Commercial Recreation X X
Communication Facility within Buildings X X
• Require a site development permit for the following uses:

Land Use Core
District
Mixed-Use
District
Mixed-Use Developments consisting of more than four
dwelling units X
Supportive/Transitional Housing X X
Home Improvement Sales and Services greater than 5,000
square feet X
• Allow for the following uses:

Land Use Core
District
Mixed-Use
District
Commercial and Residential Condominiums X X
R & D Research Facility or Office on the 2nd floor and
above and within non-street-frontage ground floor spaces X R & D Research Facility or Office X
Food Trucks (Private Property) as an accessory use subject to a Temporary Use Permit X X
Banks, without Drive-Throughs less than or equal to 2,000 square feet on the ground floor X
Automobile Rental Offices on 2nd floor and above X
Home Improvement Sales and Services less than or equal
to 5,000 square feet, including Plant Nurseries with
screened outdoor yards
X X
Packet Pg. 337
Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 5 Land Use Core
District
Mixed-Use
District
Businesses whose primary use consists of tattoo services X X Businesses whose primary use consists of massage services with a use permit X X
The Draft Specific Plan also proposes the following:
• Allow for monument signs in the Mixed-Use District; and • Design standards and a review process for fencing in the front of buildings at zero setback.

Proposed expansion of the Specific Plan Boundary.

The area proposed to be included in the Specific Plan is generally bounded by Shasta Street to the north, Lincoln Street to the south, East Street to the west, and Sequoia Street to the east.

More than half of the proposed area was originally included in the original 2010 Specific Plan but was eliminated in the 2018 update. The reasoning for reducing the boundary in the 2018 update was to better define the area considered to be Downtown Redding.

Analysis
Many of the proposed changes are a result of the stakeholder meetings and the neighborhood meeting. Although land use regulations, development standards, entitlement processes, and guidelines affecting properties within the proposed expansion area would be modified as a result of the Specific Plan Update, the proposal would not allow urban development to occur in areas where the same or similar types of urban development are not presently permitted, with the exception of height in the Butte Street corridor.

At this time, staff is of the opinion that bringing the identified, and previously excluded, public facilities and multiple family areas back into the Specific Plan would bring economic benefit to these properties. The northern portion, north of Placer Street, is currently either zoned “PF” Public Facilities or “GO” General Office and contains the “BH” Midrise Building Height Overlay District, which allows building heights to exceed the limitations of the base zoning districts by use permit up to a maximum height limit of 75 feet. Bringing this area back into the Specific Plan would not change the height limits already afforded under the current “BH” Building Height Overlay District.

The multiple family zoned areas proposed to be included are predominantly developed with multiple family development and have been developed beyond the allowed base density under the existing “RM-10” Multiple Family Zoning District. The inclusion into the Specific Plan would bring these properties into conformance since the Specific Plan allows up to 30 units per acre.

The inclusion of Butte Street would bring economic benefit to the already legal non-conforming development along this area. Most of the structures do not meet setback standards, which leads to limited redevelopment of the area. Further, the “GO” General Office district does not allow for the convenient type uses that would benefit the adjacent Garden Tract neighborhood. Staff recommended to the Commission the inclusion of the Butte Street corridor, including the Packet Pg. 338
Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 6 properties west and east of Sequoia Street, because this would connect the Specific Plan to the adjacent Redding Riverfront Specific Plan Area at the SR44 on/off ramp, thereby creating a convergence of two distinct areas at a major juncture. However, as previously noted, the Commission excluded the properties east of Sequoia Street from the boundary expansion since these are undeveloped properties and are not straddled by any legal non-conforming issue nor do they consider these properties a part of Downtown. Note that there are several diagrams in the Downtown Specific Plan that depict the Specific Plan boundary area. These diagrams will be updated to reflect the Council’s decision.

The current zoning along Butte Street, east of Continental Street, is within the “GO” General Office and “GC-VR” General Commercial-Visitor Retail Zoning Districts. The height limits are 50 feet and 45 feet, respectively. The maximum height limit in the Mixed-Use District is 75 feet, which exceeds the existing respective zoning districts. Following the input received by the Garden Tract group, regarding their concern on the height of structures and its impact onto a single-family neighborhood, staff recommended to the Commission to limit the maximum height to 35 feet on properties adjacent to a single-family zoning district. The Commission approved this recommendation.

Reducing the restrictions for banks and other active commercial uses on the ground floor in the Core District would allow for a variety of uses that are pedestrian-oriented and accessible. This was one of the options made available during the 2018 update.

One of the goals of the Specific Plan Update is to further streamline the approval process by changing the requirement for the uses that currently require a use permit to instead require a Site Development Permit.

There are currently many monument signs in the Specific Plan area, particularly in the MixedUse District. Currently, the plan prohibits monument signs in the Specific Plan area, making all of the existing signs legal non-conforming, thereby limiting the ability for businesses to perform major alterations to the existing signs. Addressing monument signs in the Mixed-Use District would alleviate the legal non-conforming designation, allow these signs to be permitted, and therefore allow major alterations, including relocation, and major design upgrades. Overall, this would enhance the aesthetics of Downtown Redding.

The Specific Plan does not regulate fencing, particularly within the areas in front of the buildings. In order to preserve the aesthetics along the street, staff recommends the incorporation of a standard and process to allow for fencing in the front of a building.

Additional staff review of projects is needed to ensure development standards are met. The introduction of a pre-application review is a critical step in ensuring the Specific Plan is adhered to. Staff conducted an informal fee study to determine the cost of the pre-application review fee of $400. As such a review will involve multiple staff members (likely 12 total) for an average of 30 minutes each, the fee was reached by calculating the value of the time allotted for the review considering the fully loaded personnel cost for each staff member.

The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on October 26, 2021, pertaining to the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan and the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map. After reviewing pertinent documents prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and closing the hearing, the Commission recommended Packet Pg. 339
Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 7 that the City Council adopt the attached addendums based on the findings that none of the conditions below are in evidence and there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the amendment proposal will have a significant effect on the environment.
• The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. • Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. • Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.
• Mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.

The Addendums to the Negative Declaration and Mitigated Negative Declaration reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding. Pursuant to Section 15074.1(b) of CEQA, the City of Redding finds that the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map are sufficient and that the project will not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution
Ordinance
Location Map
General Plan Map
Zoning Map
Proposed Zoning Map
Proposed General Plan Alternative Map
Proposed Zoning Alternative Map
DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online)
Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online)
Proposed General Plan Map
Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map (available online)
Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) Packet Pg. 340
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-_____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING (1) ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION
ADOPTED FOR THE DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN, (2)

ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF REDDING ZONING
MAP, (3) ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO REDDING’S GENERAL PLAN
(GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION GPA-2021-00449), AND (4) AMENDING ITS SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Redding’s General Plan on October 3, 2000, and WHEREAS, the attached proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram are desired to allow for the adoption of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update; and WHEREAS, on October 26, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to the proposed amendments to the General Plan and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram as depicted on the attached exhibit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed pertinent documents prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and recommended that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan be adopted for the proposed amendments to the Redding’s General Plan after consideration of all testimonial and written evidence submitted prior to and during the aforementioned public hearing; and
WHEREAS, on October 4, 1988, by Resolution 88-364, the City Council adopted a Schedule of Fees and Service Charges (Schedule), which has been subsequently amended from time-to-time; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said resolution, the City Manager is authorized and directed to revise, supplement and maintain the Schedule so that it will be, to the greatest extent possible, a comprehensive list of fees for City permit and services; and that a fee that is not on the Schedule will not be invalid but should be made a part thereof as the earliest possible time; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on GPA-2021-00449 on December 21, 2021;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true, correct and are adopted herein.

Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the proposed Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan and has determined that the actions contemplated will not have an adverse impact on the environment.

Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Resolution (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan as referred to the City Council by the Planning Commission.

Section 4. Pursuant to Section 15074.1(b) of CEQA, the City of Redding finds that the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map are sufficient and that the Project will not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.

Section 5. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for City of Redding Zoning Map as referred to the City Council by the Planning Commission.

Section 6. Pursuant to Government Code section 65356, the City Council hereby adopts the attached amendments to the General Plan Diagram associated with the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update as referred to the City Council by the Planning Commission.

Section 7. Notice and publication of the amendment to the General Plan has been provided pursuant to Government Code sections 65355 and 65090.

Section 8. Notice and publication of the proposed fee has been provided pursuant to Government Code sections 66018(a) and 6062a.

Section 9. The Schedule is hereby amended to establish and add a fee for Downtown PreApplications in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400.00) subject to an annual escalation based on the Commodity Channel Index unless said escalation is waived by majority vote of the City Council, and the City Council hereby finds that said Fee does not exceed the costs to the City of Redding to process each such application.

Section 10. Pursuant to Government Code section 66017, the effect date of the Downtown PreApplication Fee shall be sixty (60) days after its adoption.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 18th day of January, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Resolution (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING (1)

ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION
ADOPTED FOR THE DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN (2)

ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF REDDING ZONING MAP, (3) ADOPTING THE DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
(SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION AMND-2021-00361), (4)

APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO REDDING ZONING MAP (REZONING
APPLICATION RZ-2021-00450), AND (5) MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT

OF A GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. Redding’s General Plan, adopted on October 3, 2000, and effective on November 2, 2000, contains guidelines for development in Downtown, as expressed in the Downtown Focus Area Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element. The preparation of a specific plan for Downtown is recommended in said guidelines.

B. The Zoning Map of the City of Redding is incorporated in and made part of the Redding Municipal Code Title 18, known as the City of Redding Zoning Ordinance.

C. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan, the attached Chapter 6 of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan (“Plan”), and to the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map; and on October 26, 2021, recommended that the City Council adopt said addendums.

D. Based on the following findings, (1) the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan is appropriate for the Plan, and (2) the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map is appropriate.

1. The City of Redding has determined that the addendums are warranted, finding that none of the conditions below are in evidence and that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the amendment proposal will have a significant effect on the environment.
a. The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) c. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them. d. Mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.

2. The Addendums to the Negative Declaration and Mitigated Negative Declaration reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding.

3. Pursuant to Section 15074.1(b) of CEQA, the City of Redding finds that the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map are sufficient and that the Project will not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.

E. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on December 21, 2021, prior to the first reading of this Ordinance.

F. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Map are consistent with the General Plan and the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update.

G. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map and Downtown Redding Specific Plan will not increase the existing height limits already permitted. Additionally, the proposed amendments would bring the existing legal nonconforming development and uses into conformance.

Therefore, adoption of this ordinance will not negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region.

H. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65451, the Plan includes all required text and diagrams.

I. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65454, the Plan is consistent with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Appendix A of the Plan identifies the goals and policies of the Community Development and Design Element, Transportation Element, Natural Resources Element, Health and Safety Element, Recreation Element, Economic Development Element, Housing Element, Public Facilities and Services Element, and Air Quality Element of the General Plan which pertain to Downtown Redding. For the following reasons, the Plan reflects and implements the numerous General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding as well as the Downtown Focus Area Development Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element:

1. The Community Development and Design Element provides guidance on development with specific focus areas of the City, including the Downtown Focus Area. The General Plan states that Downtown should present a more urban character than the rest of the City in order to distinguish it from the City's other commercial districts. The land use regulations, development standards, and design standards and guidelines of the Plan are reflective of urban development patterns, concepts, and styles, which will further distinguish the character of Downtown from the City's other commercial districts.

Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update)

2. The Health and Safety Element promotes the reduction of criminal activity through proper site design and land use planning and a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community. The Plan directly supports the goals and policies of the Health and Safety Element through its promotion of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles and active ground floors along street frontages, nighttime activities, and residential uses to increase foot traffic and provide more eyes on the street and public realm.

3. The goals and policies of the Recreation Element support the development of a citywide recreational trail system, separating bicyclists and pedestrians from vehicular traffic and pedestrian facilities from bicycle facilities whenever feasible, and increasing the acreage and quality of developed park facilities. The open space, public realm, incentives for activation, streetscape, bicycle, and wayfinding implementation strategies of the Plan support the goals and policies of the Recreation Element through the establishment of new public parks and open spaces, activating parks and open spaces with public art, establishing pedestrian and bicycle facility priorities, conceptual streetscape improvement cross sections, a comprehensive wayfinding system, and plans for the safe and efficient connectivity between Downtown, the recreational trail system, and other bicycle facilities in the vicinity of Downtown.

4. The Plan directly supports the goals and policies of the Economic Development Element through its economic development goals and implementation strategies and its Implementation Action Plan. The Implementation Action Program includes measures regarding business development services and training opportunities, establishment of a Downtown Business Association, start-up business services and assistance, development of an available sites and buildings inventory, provision of incentives to attract desired types of development and businesses, and establishment of gap financing and micro-loan programs.

5. The goals and policies of the Housing Element promote infill development where adequate public services exist, the facilitation of mixed-use development, and the provision of a wide range of housing choices in the community. The appropriate mix of 'uses implementation strategies of the Plan support the goals and policies of the Housing Element by allowing for a mix of uses, including residential, throughout the entire Plan area, encouraging land uses that attract residents to Downtown, and allowing for a variety of housing opportunities, including mixed-use developments, loft apartments, and zero lot-line cottages and townhomes.

6. The Plan directly supports the goal and related policies of the Air Quality Element to reduce motor vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled by allowing for increased mixeduse development and residential densities and supporting a balance between all modes of transportation, including active (non-motorized) transportation modes.

J. The land use designations in the Plan, map and amendments to the General Plan Diagram, are consistent with the balance of the General Plan. The land use designations in the Plan (Downtown Core and Downtown Mixed-Use districts) are consistent with the proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram to expand the Mixed-Use designation to coincide precisely with the amended Plan area boundary. The update expands the Mixed-Use designation to the east. The goals, strategies, development standards, design guidelines and Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) procedures in the Plan provide direction as new development, redevelopment, future planning, and public-improvement efforts occur within the Specific Plan area.

K. The Plan is necessary to properly implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The Implementation section of the General Plan identifies the adoption of a Specific Plan and Development Guidelines for Downtown Redding to address the following: Appropriate land use classifications; desired mixed-use concepts; parking; and linkage to other districts. The Plan is an update of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan adopted in 2001and amended in both 2010 and 2018. The Plan addresses the aforementioned issues relative to current conditions and the community’s present long-term vision for Downtown Redding. It is important to assess the adequacy of adopted specific plans from time to time to ensure that they remain effective in implementing General Plan goals and policies and in achieving the community’s evolving vision for specific plan areas. The intent of the Plan is to improve upon the implementation of the General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding.

L. Adoption of this Ordinance will not negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region. As specified above, there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the proposed Plan will have a significant effect on the environment.

Furthermore, there is no evidence in light of the whole record that the proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram will negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region. The Plan reflects and implements the numerous General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding as well as the Downtown Focus Area Development Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element. The adoption and implementation of the Plan is anticipated to positively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding area by facilitating the achievement of the Plan’s vision to “…create a revitalized Downtown Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of historical and natural resources…” by having “…lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities, inviting to residents and visitors alike.”
Section 2. The Findings of Fact set forth in Section 1 are true, correct, and are herein adopted.

Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Negative Declaration prepared for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan.

Section 4. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map.

Section 5. The City Council hereby adopts the attached Plan, which shall supersede the Downtown Redding Specific Plan adopted in 2001 and amended in 2010 and 2018.

Section 6. The boundaries of the districts referred to in Section 18.01.050 of the Redding Municipal Code, as designated on a map entitled “Zoning Map of the City of Redding, California,” dated January 7, 2003, are hereby altered as set forth on the map attached hereto.

Section 7. The City Council hereby adopts the amendments to the City of Redding Zoning Map, as designated on the attached map, which are hereby incorporated into Title 18 of the Redding Municipal Code.

Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases may be held invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 9. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption; and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause its publication according to law.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that this ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 18th day of January, 2022, and was read and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ____ day of __________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
Dr
Grape Ave
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff Dr
Octavia St
Eleventh St
Skyline Dr
Eureka Way
Ada St
Lee St
Oak Ridge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Canal Dr
Rose Ave
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Chestnut St
Butte St
Liberty
St
Benton Dr
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

LOCATION MAP GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 20, 2021 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Specific Plan Proposed Addition
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
2010 Specific Plan Boundary
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Location Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update)

3.5 to 6
GC
GO
GC
PF-I-S
GWY
PF-I
PK
GO
GO
PF-I
PF-I
LO
HC
PF-I
GO
GWY
6 to 10
20 to 30
6 to 10
6 to 10
PF-I-S
GO
GC
6 to 10
PF-I
GO
LO
NC
NC
6 to 10
PF- I
GWY
PF-I
GC
GWY
PK
MUC
10 to 20 GO
LO

3.5 to 6
MUC
MUC

3.5 to 6

3.5 to 6
GO 3.5 to 6
6 to 10
GC
MUC
PF-I
20 to 30
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
D
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
idge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Ca
n
al Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

GENERAL PLAN MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
General Plan
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

SACRAMENTO RIVER

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: General Plan Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) RS-3.5
PF

DMUD-SP-BH
PF

DCD-SP-BH
GC
RM-6
OS
GO
GO
PF

DMUD-SP
GC
GO
PF
HC
GO-BH
GC-VR
RM-9
PF-BH
RM-20

DMUD-SP
GO-BH
GO
GO
LO
RM-9
RM-9
LO
PF
GO
GO
NC
RM-9
OS
RM-9
NC
RM-12
RM-18
RM-9
OS-SP
PF
PF

DMUD-SP-BH
GC-VR
RM-12
LO
RS-4
PF

DCD-SP-BH
RS-4
LO
LO
PF-SP
RS-3.5
RM-10

DMUD-SP-BH

DMUD-SP-BH
PF
GC-VR
RM-20
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
Dr
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
Ridge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Canal Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Che
stnut St
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

ZONING MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
Zoning District
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Zoning Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) RS-3.5
PF
PF

DMUD-SP-BH
PF

DCD-SP-BH
GC
RM-6
OS
GO
GO
PF
GC-VR

DMUD-SP
GC
GC-VR
RM-20

DMUD-SP
HC
GC-VR
RM-9

DMUD-SP-BH
RM-20

DMUD-SP
GO
LO
RM-9
RM-9
LO
PF
GO
GO
NC
RM-9
OS
RM-9
NC
RM-12
RM-18
RM-9
PF
PF
PF
GO-BH
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
Dr
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
Ridge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Canal Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Che
stnut St
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

PROPOSED ZONING MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
Proposed Zoning
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Proposed Zoning Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) MUC
PF-I

3.5 to 6
GC
GC
PF-I-S
PF-I
PK
GO
GO
GC
MUC
PF-I
LO
20 to 30
HC
MUC
GO
GWY
6 to 10
20 to 30
6 to 10
6 to 10
PF-I-S
GO
GC
6 to 10
PF-I
GO
LO
NC
NC
6 to 10
PF-I
PK
GWY
GWY
GO
MUC
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
D
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
idge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Ca
n
al Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Proposed General Plan Land Use
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

ALTERNATIVE

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Proposed General Plan Alternative Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) RS-3.5
PF
PF

DMUD-SP-BH
PF

DCD-SP-BH
GC
RM-6
OS
GO
GO
PF
GC-VR

DMUD-SP
GC
GC-VR
RM-20

DMUD-SP
HC
GC-VR
RM-9

DMUD-SP-BH
RM-20

DMUD-SP
GO
LO
RM-9
RM-9
LO
PF
GO
GO
NC
RM-9
OS
RM-9
NC
RM-12
RM-18
RM-9
PF
PF
PF
GO-BH

DMUD-SP
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
Dr
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
Ridge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Canal Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Che
stnut St
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

PROPOSED ZONING MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
Zoning District
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

SACRAMENTO RIVER

ALTERNATIVE

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Proposed Zoning Alternative Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐1

INTRODUCTION
This chapter establishes the land use regulations, development standards, and design standards and guidelines for the Specific Plan area. The intent of these regulations, standards, and guidelinesis to implement the applicable goals and policies of the Redding General Plan and the Specific Plan. Where the regulations and standards of the Specific Plan differ from the Redding Zoning Ordinance, the Specific Plan shall take precedence unless otherwise specified herein. Where the Specific Plan is silent, the Zoning Ordinance shall take precedence. Words, phrases, and terms notspecifically defined herein shall have the same definition as provided for in the Zoning Ordinance.

The Specific Plan Overlay District will be applied to the entire Specific Plan area on the City of Redding’s officialzoning map. That way, persons interested in knowing the zoning of property within the Specific Plan area will know to refer to the Specific Plan rather than to the Zoning Ordinance.

In approving individual development projects requiring
discretionary approval, the approving body (Development Services Director (Director), Board of Administrative Review, Planning Commission, or City Council) may impose additional requirements where warranted to accomplish the goals, policies, and implementation strategies of the Redding General Plan and the Specific Plan.

ZONING DISTRICTS
The Specific Plan area is comprised of two zoning
districts, the Downtown Core District and the
Downtown Mixed Use District (see Figure 6.1). The
specific land uses allowed within each district and the specific development anddesignstandardsthat pertain
to each district are described in detail in the Land Use Regulations, Development Standards, and Design
Standards and Guidelines subsections, respectively.

Building Height Overlay
Districts
There are two building height overlay districts that
affect the Specific Plan area, the Highrise and Midrise Building Height Overlay Districts; the boundaries of
the Highrise District coincide with the Downtown Core
District and the Midrise District comprises a portion of the Downtown Mixed Use District (as shown on Figure

6.1). The Highrise District allows unlimited height; the Midrise District allows heights up to 75 feet.

6. Regulations, Standards,
and Guidelines
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-2 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Chapter
6 FIGURE 6.1: ZONING
Downtown Mixed Use District, DMUD
Downtown Core District, DCD
Single Family, RS-3.5
Single Family, RS-4
Multiple Family, RM-6
Multiple Family, RM-9
Multiple Family, RM-10
Multiple Family, RM-12
Multiple Family, RM-18
Multiple Family, RM-20
Open Space, OS
Public Facilities, PF
Heavy Commercial, HC
General Commercial, GC
Neighborhood Commercial, NC
General Commercial-Visitor and
Retail, GC-VR
0 0.05 0.1 0.2
Miles

EUREKA WAY

TRINITY ST

RIVERSIDE DR

CENTER ST

OREGON STOREGON ST

MARKET ST

N COURT S
WES
T
T ST

TEHAMA ST

BUTTE ST

BUTTE ST

YUBA ST

BUTTE ST

YUBA ST

PLACER ST

SHASTA ST

SOUTH ST

SACRAMENTO ST

LOCUST ST

CYPRESS ST

GOLD ST

SONOMA ST

HILL ST

LINCOLN ST

GOLD ST

EAST ST

GILBERT ST

LIBERTY ST

CONTINENTAL ST

CONTINENTAL ST

PINE ST

WALDON ST

SEQUOIA ST

VERDA ST

GARDEN ST

RAILROAD AVE RAILROAD AVE

COURT ST

TERRACE ST

WEST ST

CHESTNUT ST

CHESTNUT ST

CALIFORNIA ST

WILLIS ST
ROSE

AVE ROSE AVE
44 299
273

LINCOLN ST

EUREKA WAY
Downtown Core District Boundary

PINE ST
Midrise Buildings Allowed
Highrise Buildings Allowed
Source: City of Redding, 2016
N
Downtown Mixed Use District, DMUD
Downtown Core District, DCD
Single Family, RS-3.5
Single Family, RS-4
Multiple Family, RM-6
Multiple Family, RM-9
Multiple Family, RM-10
Multiple Family, RM-12
Multiple Family, RM-18
Multiple Family, RM-20
Open Space, OS
Public Facilities, PF
Heavy Commercial, HC
General Commercial, GC
Neighborhood Commercial, NC
General Commercial-Visitor and
Retail, GC-VR
0 0.05 0.1 0.2
Miles

EUREKA WAY

TRINITY ST RINITY S

RIVERSIDE DR

CENTER ST

OREGON ST

MARKET ST

N COURT S
WEST S
T
T

TEHAMA ST

BUTTE ST

BUTTE ST

YUBA ST

BUTTE ST

YUBA ST

PLACER ST

SHASTA ST

SOUTH ST

SACRAMENTO ST

LOCUST STLOCUST ST

CYPRESS ST

GOLD ST

SONOMA ST

HILL ST

LINCOLN ST

GOLD ST

EAST ST

GILBERT ST

LIBERTY ST

LIBERTY ST

CONTINENTAL ST

CONTINENTAL ST

PINE ST

WALDON ST

SEQUOIA ST

VERDA ST

GARDEN ST

RAILROAD AVE RAILROAD AVE

COURT ST

TERRACE ST

WEST ST

CHESTNUT ST

CALIFORNIA ST

WILLIS ST
ROSE
AVE
44 299
273

LINCOLN ST

EUREKA WAY
Downtown Core District Boundary

PINE ST
Midrise Buildings Allowed
Highrise Buildings Allowed
Source: City of Redding, 2016
N
Specic Plan Proposed Addition
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐3

LAND USE REGULATIONS
Each zoning district has a unique set ofregulations pertaining to land uses which are permitted, permitted with the
approval of a use permit, or prohibited:

Permitted (P): Permitted uses are required to obtain a zoning clearance prior to issuance of any permits or authorization for the proposed use or construction.

Permitted with the Approval of a Site Development Permit (SDP): These uses typically have unusual site development features or operating characteristics requiring special consideration. They may be permitted subject to specific conditions that ensure that the use will be designed,
located, and operated in a manner compatible with
adjacent properties and the surrounding area and in
compliance with the goals and policies of the Specific Plan and General Plan. These uses are permitted with the
approval of a site development permit by the Board of
Administrative Review.

Permitted with the Approval of a Use Permit (U):

These uses typically have unusual site development
features or operating characteristics requiring special consideration. They may be permitted subject to
specific conditions that ensure that the use will be
designed, located, and operated in a manner
compatible with adjacent properties and the
surrounding area and in compliance with the goals and
policies of the Specific Plan and General Plan. These
uses arepermitted with the approval of a use permit by
the Planning Commission.

Prohibited (―): Uses which are not permitted.

The land use regulations contained in this chaptershall apply to all new development, including additions and
changes in use, as described in Chapter 7,
Administration and Implementation. All new
developmentsincluding additions are subject to a Pre‐
Application process.

Table 6‐1 presents the land use regulations for the
Specific Plan area’s Downtown Core District and
Downtown Mixed Use District.

Table 6-1: DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS

DOWNTOWN CORE DOWNTOWN MIXED USE
Residential Uses
Mixed‐Use Development P P (<= 4 units) / SDP (> 4 units) P Multiple Family Residential UP (<= 4 units) / SDP (> 4 units) P Two‐Family Dwelling ― ―
Single‐Family Dwelling ― ―
Condominium P P
Group Residential ― ―
Supportive Housing/Transitional Housing ―SDP ―SDP
Transitional Housing ― ―
Residential Cannabis Cultivation P5 P5
Public and Semipublic Uses
College and Trade Schools USDP/P (2nd floor and
above)1
P
Schools, Public or Private ― P
Offices, Business and Professional P (2nd floor and above)1 P Offices, Medical and Dental P (2nd floor and above)1 P
Government Offices P (2nd floor and above)1 USDP/P (2nd floor and above)1 Clinics P (2nd floor and above)6 USDP/P (2nd floor and above)6 Clubs and Lodges USDP P
Community Social Service Facilities ― ―
Homeless Shelter ― ―
Community Centers (primary use) P (2nd floor and above)6 U/P (2nd floor and above)6 Community Centers (non‐primary use) P2 P2
Park and Recreation Facilities(excluding community centers) P P Cultural Institutions P P
Hospitals(including emergency care) ― U
(Table continues on following page.)
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐4 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Table 6-1: DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS (CONTINUED)

DOWNTOWN CORE DOWNTOWN MIXED USE
Public and Semipublic Uses (continued)
Public Safety Facilities P P
Religious Facilities (primary use) P (2nd floor and above)6 USDP/P (2nd floor and above)6 Religious Facilities (non‐primary use) P2 P2
Surface Parking Lots, Public and Commercial P P
Parking Structures, Public and Commercial USDP P
Residential Care, Senior / General USDP USDP
Residential Care, General U U
Commercial Uses
Condominum P P
R & D Research Facility or Office P (2nd floor and above)6 P Retail Sales P3 P3
Food and Beverage Sales P P
Food and Beverage Preparation P P
Restaurants, Full Service P P
Restaurants, Drive‐Thru ― U
Bars/Night Clubs/Lounges P P
Convenience Gas Mart ― USDP
Retail Cannabis Sales ―  ―
Retail Cannabis Sales / Commercial Cannabis Cultivation ― ― Food Trucks (Private Property) P7 P7
Banks, with Drive‐Thru ― USDP
Banks, without Drive‐Thru P (<=2,000 sq.ft. on ground floor) P (2nd floor and above)6
P
Automobile/Vehicle Service and Repair, Minor ― U
Automobile/Vehicle Repair, Major ― ―
Automobile/Vehicle Sales and Leasing, Outdoor ― U
Automobile/Vehicle Sales and Leasing, Indoor P P
Automobile Rentals ―P (Rental Office Only – 2nd floor
and above)
USDP
Automobile Washing ― USDP
Heavy Equipment Sales, Service and Rental ― ―
Large Vehicle Sales, Service and Rental ― ―
Vehicle Storage ― ―
Personal Services P4 P4
Personal Improvement Services P P
Travel Services P P
Hotels and Motels P P
Bed and Breakfast Establishments P P
Funeral Parlors and Mortuaries ― P
Laboratories USDP/P (2nd floor and above) P
Adult Business Establishments ― ―
Animal Sales and Services P P
Building Materials and Services ― ―
Home Improvement Sales and Services ―P (<= 5,000 sq. ft.) 8 ―P (<= 5,000 sq.ft.) 8 SDP (> 5,000 sq. ft) 8
Business Services USDP/P (2nd floor and above) P
Maintenance and Repair Services USDP/P (2nd floor and above) P Commercial Recreation USDP USDP
Commercial Entertainment P P
Industrial Uses
Industry, Custom Handicraft P P
Industry, General ― ―
Industry, Heavy ― ―
(Table continues on following page.)
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐5
Table 6-1: DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS (CONTINUED)

DOWNTOWN CORE DOWNTOWN MIXED USE
Industrial Uses (continued)
Cannabis Distribution, Manufacturing, Processing, Testing, and
Storage
― ―
Warehousing and Storage ― ―
Transportation, Communication and Utilities
Communication Facilities, Antennae and Transmission Towers U U Communication Facilities Within Buildings USDP/P (2nd floor and above) USDP/P (2nd floor and above) Transportation Passenger Terminals U U
Utilities, Minor P P
Utilities, Major ― ― 1 Use permitted in buildings in existence at the time of adoption of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update. In buildings constructed following the adoption of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update, use permitted within non‐street‐fronting ground floor spaces, and within street‐fronting ground floor spaces when such use will not occupy a majority of the street‐fronting ground floor space of the subject building or site, subject to the approval of a Site Development Permit by the Development Services Director 2 The subject space must be utilized by a single permitted primary use for a majority of the total time the space is utilized on a typical weekly basis. 3 Businesses whose primary use consists ofselling tobacco and/or electronic/vaporsmoking products and/or products designed for consuming tobacco and cannabis are is prohibited within the Downtown Specific Plan Area.
4 Businesses whose primary use consists of tattoo and/or massage services are prohibitedis Permitted with the Approval of a Use Permit. 5 Indoor cannabis cultivation permitted in accordance with the provisions of Redding Municipal Code Chapter 6.12. 6 Use permitted within non‐street‐fronting ground floorspaces. Use permitted within street‐fronting ground floorspaces when such use will not occupy a majority of the street‐fronting ground floorspace of the subject building or site, subject to the approval of a Site Development Permit by the Development Services Director. 7 Businesses whose primary use consists of preparation and consumption of food, sold in Food Trucks are permitted as an accessory use in accordance with the provisions of RMC Chapter ‐ 18.17.020.K. 68 Home Improvement Sales and Services – Plant Nurseries with screened outdoor yards are Permitted.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐6 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS
Table 6‐2 presents the Development Standards for the
Downtown Core District and Downtown Mixed Use District.

Table 6-2: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

(Table continues on following page.)

STANDARDS DOWNTOWN
CORE

DOWNTOWN

MIXED USE ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS
Dwelling Units Per Gross Acre Unlimited 301
1Density bonuses may be granted in accordance with
Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18.26.

Minimum Lot Area (Square Feet) NA NA
Minimum Lot Frontage (Feet) 20 20
Minimum Lot Depth (Feet) NA NA
Minimum Building Height (Stories) 2 22, 3
2Less than two stories may be permitted with the
approvalof a Site Development Permit by the Director. 3Properties adjacent to a single‐family zoning district shall not exceed 35 feet in height.

Maximum Building Height (Feet) Unlimited 7543
34Roof elements, mechanical penthouses, and other
elements that add visual interest to a building may exceed 75 feet in height.

All roof‐mounted equipment shall be screened, consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Special
consideration shall be given to the location and screening of noise generating equipment such as refrigeration units, air conditioning, and exhaust fans. Noise‐reducing screens and insulation may be required where such equipment has the potential to impact residential uses.

Minimum Parking Setback (Feet)
Front NA4 NA54 54Parking that is accessory to an on‐site use is not permitted adjacent to the street in the Downtown Core
and Downtown Mixed Use districts except as described
below. All parking that is accessory to an on‐site use shall be provided in the rear of the building accessible from an alley; properties without alley access are permitted to have one driveway for access to parking. In the Downtown Core and the Downtown Mixed Use districts, with the approval of a site development permit by the Director, parking that is accessory to an on‐site use may be permitted adjacentto the street notto exceed 50 percent ofthe property frontage with a minimum setback of 5 feet; parking permitted
adjacent to the street shall be screened from public view to the satisfaction of the Director. Where parking is the primary use of a site in the Specific Plan area, parking is permitted adjacentto the streetwith nominimumsetback;
however, vehicles shall be prevented from encroaching
into the public right‐of‐way through the use of walls, curbs, wheelstops, above‐ground tree planters, or other methods Side (Interior) 0 0
Side (Corner) NA4 NA4
Rear 0 0
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐7
Table 6-2: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (CONTINUED)

STANDARDS DOWNTOWN
CORE

DOWNTOWN

MIXED USE ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS
Maximum Building Setback (Feet)
Front 05 065 65Buildings shall be placed immediately adjacent to the back of sidewalk, except for plazas, outdoor seating areas, paseos, corner “cut‐offs”, public art, and similar pedestrian‐ oriented features to the satisfaction of the Director.

Side (Interior) NA NA
Side (Corner) 05 05
Rear NA NA
Additional Standards
Nonconforming Uses and Structures
Where at the time of the adoption of this updated Specific Plan, a lawful use, structure, or site exists which would otherwise not be permitted by the regulations established herein, such use, structure, or site may be continued
indefinitely subject to the provisions of Redding Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18.46, with the following exception:

Legal nonconforming uses, structures, and sites within the Specific Plan area shall be considered abandoned if the use ceases, the structure remains vacant, or the use of the site ceases for a continuous period of three years.

Installation of Public Improvements
Project developers are responsible for providing public improvements such as streets, water and sewer lines,
drainage facilities, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, and other similar items in compliance with City standards at the time of development. These improvements may be in the public right‐of‐way adjacent to the property.

If multiple phases of development are proposed,
improvements shall be installed during the first phase as deemed appropriate by the approving body. Forthe purpose of this requirement, development shall also include the expansion of existing structures by 50 percent or more of the gross floor area.

Underground Utilities
All electrical, telephone, cable television, and similar distribution lines providing directservicesto a development site shall be installed underground within the site. The Director may waive this requirement upon a determination that the installation is infeasible. Where applicable, Specific Plan area developments shall comply with the provisions of Redding Municipal Code Title 14, Utilities.

Pop‐Up Uses
Cities across the United States are encouraging and
streamlining Pop‐up Uses in their vacant storefronts and buildings. “Pop‐up uses” refer to uses that are temporary and typically do not exceed a duration of six months. Where they have been successfulthey have given multiple benefits, including activation of empty retail spaces, generation of excitement and additional visitors, and opportunitiesfor new businesses to test the market. Following are new standards for accommodating and encouraging pop‐up businesses in
Downtown Redding. These standards apply to the Specific Plan area only (Downtown Core District and Downtown
Mixed Use District).
• Pop‐up Uses are defined astemporary usesin existing
buildings. These uses may be assembly, business,
mercantile, and storage (ancillary to a permissible
primary use).
• Pop‐up uses do not require a final certificate of
occupancy, but do require a temporary certificate of
occupancy.
• Pop‐up Usesshall be located on private property, not
on public rights‐of‐way.
• Pop‐up hours of operation: 8 am‐10 pm.
• Length of time at a location Pop‐up Uses are
permitted: maximum of 6 months, with one renewal
allowable.
• Pop‐up Uses are notrequired to provide off‐street
parking.
• Pop‐up Uses must adhere to zoning requirementsfor
signage, restrooms, and life/fire safety.
• Pop‐up Uses must meet approval of Fire Marshal if
involving hot food service.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐8 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Trees and Shade
Well‐maintained, mature trees significantly add to the
character and aesthetic charm of downtown areas and
also provide shade and increase pedestrian comfort. The City aims to protect and enhance the aesthetic qualities of Downtown Redding provided by trees and to promote a
healthy and attractive urban landscape as growth continues.

The City Council adopted the Downtown Redding Street Tree Management Plan in December 2017, which inventoried all trees within the plan’s area and identified trees in need of removal and pruning, as well assites where new treesshould be planted. The Street Tree Plan recommends a pruning plan to keep Downtown Redding’s trees healthy for the long‐
term, and recommends increasing the size of tree planters wherever possible to allow for healthy root systems; when the width of a sidewalk prevents existing tree planters from being widened, they should be lengthened along the street alignmentto provide greatersoilsurface area, allow forroot/ air exchange, water infiltration, and reduce the possibility of damage to adjacent sidewalks. In addition, it
recommendsthe following treatment to improve the life of trees:
• Maximize distance to infrastructure.
• De‐compact and amend soils.
• Integrate alternative paving systems.
• Re‐route sidewalks.
• Utilize tree grates.

Specifically, Silva Cells, structural soils, pervious concrete, alternative paving, and bioswales/rain gardens are
recommendedtoreduceimpervioushardscapeinDowntown
Redding, thereby helping the root systems of street trees, and stormwater filtration, in general.

New development must provide and maintain street trees
along building frontage(s) in keeping with the plan, or must provide a covered arcade over adjacent sidewalk(s).

Depending on space constraints, planting sitesshould be covered with tree grates on sidewalksin long, linear beds, or in bulbout beds to protect roots and soil.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐9
Parking Requirements
Downtown Core District
Within the Downtown Core District, off‐street parking is not required. However, if parking is provided within the Downtown Core District, it shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Redding Zoning Ordinance Section

18.41.030.L.1.

Downtown Mixed Use District
Because the Downtown Mixed Use District is envisioned
as a pedestrian‐first environment with bicycle facilities, pedestrian amenities, and mixed‐use development, it is
appropriate for the off‐street parking requirements within this district to be different than citywide standards. The following parking standards shall apply to all change of use, expansion, and new construction proposals within the Downtown Mixed Use District:
• Multiple Family Residential: One space per unit
• Mixed Use Development: The parking requirement
shall be equal to the sum of the parking requirement
for each proposed use; the parking requirement for
uses other than multiple family residential may be
reduced pursuant to the standards as follows.
• For uses other than multiple‐family residential, the
off‐street parking requirements shall be 25 percent
lessthan the standards of Zoning Ordinance Section

18.41.040; these requirements may be further
reduced by the Director or Planning Commission in
accordance with the following standards.

Additional Parking Reductions
Additional parking reductionsfor all uses otherthanmultiple family residential may be granted by the Director pursuant to the following Tiers 1‐3 provisions that follow. The total parking reduction granted by theDirectorshall not exceed 75 percent, except in cases where the net parking requirement is four spaces or less, in which case the Director may grant a reduction of up to 100 percent. Reductions of greater than 75 percent may be permitted by the Planning Commission
through the granting of a use permit.

Tier 1
• Off‐site, off‐street parking located within 1,000 feet of the subject property may satisfy up to 100 percent of
the parking requirement for a project. The location of
off‐site parking for a project may be changed at any
time subject to the approval of the Director.
• Where parties wish to cooperatively establish and
operate parking facilities where one use generates
parking demands primarily during hours when the
remaining use(s) is not in operation or where adjacent
uses generate joint/redundant trips, a reduction of up
to 50 percent of the required parking may be approved
by the Director. Such approvals shall require the
submission of satisfactory statements by the parties
providing such facilities and the parties such facilities are to serve, describing the nature of the uses and
times when such uses operate so asto indicate the lack
of conflict between such uses.
• Off‐site and joint parking approvals shall require
such documents or commitments as may be deemed
necessary in each particular case to ensure provision
and maintenance of the required off‐street parking
spaces.

Tier 2
The Director may grant up to an additional 25 percent
reduction if the development provides one or more of the following:
• Public plazas located outside the public right‐of‐way which are at least 500 square feet in area and at least 10 feet in width.
• Investmentsin off‐site bicycle or pedestrian trail
improvements.

Tier 3
The Director may grant up to an additional 25 percent
reduction for active transportation improvements and/or the provision of transit passes. For improvements provided within the public right‐of‐way, a reduction of up to one space may be granted per $6,000 worth of improvements, as
determined by the City Engineer. Eligible active
transportationimprovements include but are not limited to the following:
• On‐site bicycle facilitiesin excess of those required by the California Green Building Standards Code.
• Elimination of existing driveways along streetfrontag‐ es.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐10 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
• Provision of off‐street vehicle passengerloading/
unloading zones.
• Exceedances of the applicable development and
design standards which support the active transporta‐
tion objectives of the Specific Plan.
• Reduction of one space for each transit pass purchased from the Redding Area Bus Authority for one individual
for a period of 10 years; the purchase of multiple
passes equivalent to one individual for a period of
10 years shall be acceptable. Such passes shall be
provided to one or more resident, business owner, or
employee of the subject project at no cost.
• Other similar type improvements to the public realm
that enhances active transportation or transit as
determined by the Director of Development Services,
including but not limited to:
» Enhanced intersections, such as pedestrian signal
upgrades, crosswalk/bicycle facility striping, rapid
flashing beacons, and bulbouts.
» Art, street furniture, landscaping (hanging flowers,
pots, etc.) provided within the public right‐of‐way.

Other Requirements in Downtown Redding
Recognizing the uniqueness of existing buildings and their associated parking within the Specific Plan area, within either district, when parking is required or provided for anyremodel or reuse of any existing building, parking
standards(i.e., space and aisle dimensions, number of
spaces)may be reduced or modified subject to approval
of a sitedevelopment permit by the Director.

Bicycle Parking
Bicycle parking shall be provided with new development
and remodel/reuse of existing buildings in accordance with the requirements of the California Green Building Standards Code.

Special Use Regulations and
Standards
Special use regulations and standards apply to sidewalk dining, outdoor uses and displays, and vehicle sales and repair to ensure that such uses do not adversely impact adjoining properties.

Sidewalk dining that lines the sidewalk while maintaining a clear pedestrian path enlivens the street.

Merchandise in front of shops during business hours can activate the street if they maintain a clear pedestrian path.

Sidewalk Dining
Sidewalk dining on public or private streets can enhance the pedestrian ambiance of Downtown Redding and is
encouraged. The rules, regulations, and applicable areas are defined in Redding Municipal Code Chapter 13.25.

Outdoor Uses and Displays
All uses, including commercial, repair, service, and storage shall be conducted within a completely enclosed building or be completely screened frompublic view, except as provided as follows.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐11
A wall‐mounted sign should be in keeping with the
building’sstyle and made of quality materials.

Window signs in retail storefronts in Downtown Redding
should complement the display and merchandise.

A projecting sign,sometimesreferred to as a fin sign,
providesan easy way for pedestrians to spot businesses.

The outdoor display of merchandise in conjunction with
specialty retail, antique shops, flower shops, and similar specialty and craft businesses is permitted within the Specific Plan area subject to the following provisions:
• Temporary outdoor displays may be allowed on devel‐
oped properties(excluding parking lots) and upon pub‐
lic sidewalks provided that aminimumwidth offive feet
(unless approved by Development Services Director)
shall be maintained clear of any obstructions, and the
display shall not obstruct access to the entrance of any building or access ramps.
• No additional signs or other advertising devices (tem‐ porary or permanent)shall be used in conjunction with
an outdoor display, exceptthose allowed in compliance
with the Redding Zoning Ordinance and this Specific
Plan.
• The outdoor display of merchandise shall only occur
during times when the associated establishment is also
open for business.
• Outdoor display fixtures shall be of good quality and durable materials and construction and shall be main‐
tained in such a manner as to enhance Downtown
Redding. Merchandise displays utilizing card tables;
cardboard cartons; folding chairs; lightweightmaterials; or deteriorated, damaged, splintered, or other similar
furniture are not permitted.
• Additionaltemporary outdoor display and sales(includ‐ ing in parking lots) may be permitted in accordance
with Redding Zoning Ordinance Section 18.17.020.E.

Sign Regulations
Signs within the Specific Plan area, including temporary signs,shall be erected, constructed, altered, and maintained in accordance with the regulations of this Specific Plan.

The purpose of the sign regulations in this subsection is to provide the means for adequate identification of buildings and businesses by regulating and controlling the design,size, and location of all signs within the Specific Plan area. The intent of these regulations is to establish specific standards for all exteriorsignage to ensure continuity, consistency, and harmony with the pedestrian quality of the Specific Plan area.

No person shall erect, construct, enlarge, alter, move, improve,remove, convert, or equip any sign orsign structure Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐12 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
or cause or permit the same to be done contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of these sign regulations.

Sign Standards for Permitted Signs in the
Specific Plan Area
Wall‐MountedSigns.Wall‐mounted signs canbe amaximum
of one square foot per linear foot of business establishment per public street and/or alley frontage located not higher than the lowest of the following:
• 25 feet above grade.
• Bottom of the sill line of the second floor window.

Murals. Wall murals shall meet the following regulations:
• The mural can be up to 300 square feet by‐right and
greater than 300 square feet with the approval of an
administrative sign permit.
• The mural shall demonstrate artistic quality or theme as opposed to direct orindirect illustrative advertising. • When bands of color or lines use the wall, building
facade, or parapet as either figure or ground, then the entire surface of these areas shall be included as part of the mural area.
• The muralshall not be placed on decorative block or
brick walls.
• Approval ofthe muralshalltake into consideration the
visual effect of the mural on adjoining properties and
the overall architecture of the building. The colors and materials used shall be reasonably harmonious with
those in the area.
• The Director may require a site development permit if the sign could have an aesthetic impact or be contro‐
versial.

Permanent Window Signs. On the ground floor, coverage
shall not exceed 20 percent of the total window and door area visible from the exterior of the building including furniture and temporary signs as well as permanent window signs; on second floors, coverage shall not exceed 25 percent per window. This will ensure transparency between the
business and the sidewalk to help provide eyes on the street.

Awning Signs. On the ground floor, each awning shall not exceed a maximum coverage of 20 percent of the total
ground floor exterior surface area. On second floors and above, each awning shall not exceed a maximum coverage
of 10 percent of the totalsecond floor exterior surface area.

Internal cabinet‐type illumination is not allowed.

Sandwich board signsthat are out of the pedestrian path are allowed.

Projecting Signs. One projecting sign per business is
allowed; maximum size may not exceed 10 square feet and shall not extend more than 3 feet from the wall surface.

Internal illumination is prohibited. Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings, not to poles or other signs.

Projecting signs may encroach into the public right‐of‐way a maximum of 3 feet; minimum of 7‐foot vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. Theater marquees (e.g., Cascade Theatre) are exempt from this requirement.

Under Canopy Signs. One sidewalk‐oriented sign per
business is allowed under a canopy, roof, awning, covered walkway, arcade, or porch; a maximum of 4 square feet per business entrance is allowed; minimum of 7‐foot vertical clearance is required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign.

A‐Frame/Sandwich Board Signs. One A‐frame or sandwich
board sign allowed per business with a maximum size of 4 feet high by 2 feet wide. No illumination is allowed. The sign shall be located on the sidewalk adjacentto the curb. A clear pathway of at least 4 feet in width shall be maintained for passage of pedestrians; however, more space is preferred.

The sign shall only be present during regular business hours.

Temporary Signs. Temporary signs shall abide by the
provisions of Chapter 18.42 ofthe Redding ZoningOrdinance regulating temporary signs.

Menu Boards. One menu board, up to 4 square feet in area, is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment.

Menuboardsmaycontainonlythenameoftheestablishment
and the food available inside. The menu board must be
located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐13
Monument Signs. A maximum of one double‐face sign
per street frontage is permitted in the Downtown
Mixed‐Use District. Height of the sign shall not exceed 6 feet above grade and the width shall not exceed 4
feet. Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12 inches in height. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated.

Internal illumination is prohibited.

Multi‐Tenant Project Signs. Any project that proposes to provide space for more than one tenant shall indicate the size and approximate location of all signs to be erected on the property at the time of initial application. Signs shall be shown on elevation drawings with accurate dimensions provided.

Sign Materials
Substantial, long‐lasting, quality materials should be used in all cases. Separate cut‐out letters are encouraged.

Sign Lighting
Internally lit cabinetsigns are discouraged. Spotlighting from separate fixtures is encouraged. Lights should be sized and aimed appropriately to minimize light spillover and glare.

Prohibited Signs in the Specific Plan
AreaDowntown Core District
The following signs are prohibited within the Specific Plan area in order to improve the appearance and pedestrian
oriented environment as follows:
• Freestanding pole signs
• Monument signs
• Roof‐mounted signs
• Rotating, moving, signs
• Window signs above the second floor
• Signs constructed of paper, cloth, balloons, plastic
streamers or bunting
• Signs that mimic regulatory traffic signage
• Any sign prohibited by the Redding Municipal Code
and not expressly “Permitted” by this Specific Plan
Rule of Measurement
The area of a wallsign or logo with individual lettersshall be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol.

Exceptions
The following are exceptions to the sign standards
listedabove:
• By approval of an administrative sign permit, the
Director may authorize an exception to the Specific
Plan sign regulations when, in the opinion of the
Director, the exception isin keeping with the intent of the regulations and the character of the Specific Plan. or isfor the refurbishment, reuse, and/or relocation of any sign that does not conform to the standards of the
City’s Sign Ordinance.
• Identifier sign(s) for any Downtown improvement
district, or similar marketing organization or entity
operating within the Specific Plan area, may be
authorized by approval of an administrative sign
permit by the Director. The height, size, and design of the identifier sign(s) shall be established by the permit approval upon a determination by the Director that the
identifier sign is in character with the Specific Plan.

DESIGN STANDARDS AND

GUIDELINES
The design standards and guidelines in this chapter are meant to achieve quality design and are to be used during the City’s development review process to assess a project’s conformity with the Specific Plan. Design standards are mandatory and are intended to improve the quality of
design, whereas design guidelines are advisory and are most applicable to projects requiring approval of a discretionary action by the City.

The design standards and guidelines acknowledge the
prevailing built environment and development patterns
within Downtown Redding today. These standards and
guidelines, therefore, do not seek to impose an overriding style, a limited color palette, or an artificial theme, but to promote Downtown Redding’s positive design
characteristics.It is not the intent of these design standards and guidelines to eliminate design freedom or discourage innovative design. The design standards and guidelines
complement the mandatory development standards
contained in thischapter, and the Redding Zoning Ordinance by providing good examples of appropriate design solutions and by providing design interpretations of the various
mandatory and advisory regulations. The standards and
guidelines are less quantitative than the mandatory
development standardsand, therefore, may be interpreted with some flexibility in their application to specific projects.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐14 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
The design standards and guidelines are organized into
thefollowing sections:

1. Interpretation provides an overview of the purpose,
application, exemption, organization, and other aspects of the design standards.

2. Applicability provides guidelinesfor when these stan‐ dards are appropriate.

3. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) includes design considerationsfor reducing op‐
portunitiesfor crime to occurthrough enhanced natural
surveillance, natural access control, and territoriality.

4. Site Planning and Design includes standards for building and parking location and design in relationship to the
street (its street edge condition).

5. Storefront Design provides standards that promote
quality design for new infill buildings and rehabilitation of existing buildings.

6. Building Design presentsstandardsthat promote quality buildings within the Downtown Redding Specific Plan
area.

7. Landscaping/Hardscape Design provides a basic land‐
scape design framework which is to be used in conjunc‐
tion with new development, and as a helpful tool for
property ownersinterested in upgrading the landscaping
of existing development.

8. Parking, Circulation and Access providesstandardsfor good design of parking, circulation and access.

Interpretation
To aid in the interpretation of these standards, an applicant should understand that the design standards presented in this chapter will be enforced unless an alternative measure meets or exceeds the intent of the standards, and it can be satisfactorily demonstrated that there is a significant and compelling reason to deviate from them. Design guidelines help articulate the standards, but are recommendations,not requirements unless required in conjunction with the
approval of a discretionary action by the City.

Applicability
The provisions of this section are applicable to all
development within the Specific Plan area.

Any new building, addition, exterior alteration, landscaping, modification to an approved landscaping plan, or parking lot design shall adhere to these design standards, as applicable.

It is important to note, however, that these standards do not affect existing buildings which are not proposed for new construction, exterior alterations, landscaping, or changesin the parking lot layout.

The design standards will be utilized during the City’s development review process to achieve the highest level of design quality and at the same time provide the flexibility necessary to encourage creativity on the part of project designers in response to existing site conditions.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐15
Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design
The concept of Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design (CPTED) is a multi‐disciplinary approach to create safer, more vibrant, and more active environments. The
CPTED concept uses a variety of community design strategies aimed at reducing opportunities for crime and the fear of crime, and increasing opportunitiesforsocial interaction and activity, through the proper design, redesign, and effective use of the built environment. Although crime and safety issues are dynamic and complex processes that go beyond planning and design, development standards and design
guidelines can help create safer environments.

These CPTED principles are meant to assist in reducing the potential for crime incidents and help to create a safer, healthier, andmore vibrantDowntown Redding. Many ofthe
developmentstandards and design standards and guidelines in this chapterfollow these CPTED principles. Specific CPTED guidelines can be viewed in Appendix B.

CPTED involves design of physicalspace in the context of the needs of bona fide users of the space, the activity planned for the space, and the predictable behavior of bona fide, as well as illegitimate, users.

The five key principles of CPTED are:

1. Access Control uses design features to create
boundaries between public, private, and semi‐private
spaces.

2. Natural Surveillance focuses on the placement and
design of physical features and the arrangement of
usesto allow people engaged in their normal activity
to passively observe the space around them.

3. Territorial Reinforcement entails design features and physical elements which convey a sense of “active”
ownership of and sense of pride for a space; these
elements clearly designate between public, private,
and semi‐private areas.

4. Management and Maintenance involves the proper
administration and upkeep of buildings, walkways,
landscaping, lighting, and other physical features to
support and ensure the intended purpose of a space.

5. Activation of Space encouragesstrategiesto activate
the space with proper uses, fosterssocial interaction,
and creates a sense of ownership and community
through placemaking elements.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐16 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
A well‐maintained parking lot with a designated pedestrian path controls access.

Ground‐floor retail that faces the sidewalk with permeable windows provides views inside and out, defined outdoor seating designates semi‐private areas from the public walkway, and a well‐cared for streetscape make active ownership known.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐17
Site Planning and Design
Development Standards in Table 6‐2 provide the minimum
setback requirements for buildings and parking. All projects in Downtown Redding should follow the prescribed edge
conditions, with the exception of the following design
standards as illustrated in Figure 6.2.

Design Standards
■ Buildings set back from the street along front and/or side street property lines must be designed for active, public use, such as pedestrian plazas, outdoor seating
areas, green spaces, paseos, or “corner cut‐offs.”
■ Create continuous pedestrian activity in an uninterrupt‐ ed sequence by minimizing gaps between buildings.
■ Within the Downtown Core District, no parking shall
be located within any front yard or corner‐side yard
setback (see the following parking section for specific parking requirements). Pedestrian paseos to parking
are encouraged.
■ Fencing in the front of a building at 0‐foot setback is permitted at a maximum allowable height of 4 feet
unless integrated with the façade of the building. The
material used for such fence is subject to approval of a Site Development Permit by Director.

Design Guidelines
» Locate the principal façade and entry to buildings to‐ wardsthe public right‐of‐way or off a publicly accessible courtyard to ensure pedestrian safety and retail
visibility.
» Design and place buildings, lighting, windows, entranc‐ es and exits, parking lots, walkways, landscaping, trees, fences, walls,signage, public art, and any other physical feature to direct the public to public spaces, and deter access to private spaces. On sites where restricted ac‐ cessis necessary, use perimeter walls/fencesthat allow
people to see inside and out. In general, security gates are discouraged as they create an impression of an
unwelcome community.
» Provide lighting that makes pedestrians more visible
and provides more visibility to pedestrians; is even,
uniform, and does not produce dark areas; illuminates
areas above or near building entryways; and illuminates “safe routes” with pedestrian‐scale, glare‐free lighting so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity.

FIGURE 6.2: SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐18 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Storefront Design
Storefronts traditionally experience the greatest amount of change during a building’s life and hold the most potential for creative alterations affecting both the character of the building and the streetscape as a whole. In an effort to promote quality design for new infill buildings, and the rehabilitation of existing buildings, the following specific storefront and façade standards are presented.

Design Standards
■ Building entries must be recessed at least 12 inches. ■ An awning, canopy, or arcade isrequired above building entries and ground floor street‐facing windows, unless
a tree, pole, or other impediment exists.
■ Storefront doors are to contain a high percentage of
glass(minimumof 50 percent) to encourage pedestrian
window shopping.
■ Ground‐floor windows must use clear glass(88 percent
light transmission).
■ The portion of ground‐floor street‐facing façades be‐ tween 3 feet and 8 feet in height shall be at least 70
percent transparent.

In addition to fabric, awnings or canopies made of quality wood, glass, and/or metal are encouraged.
■ Placement of air conditioning units in individual
windows and window transom areas is prohibited on
ground‐floor, street‐facing façades.
■ Solid roll‐up security features are prohibited on store‐ fronts. If roll‐up security features are to be incorporat‐ ed,they shall be transparent, placed inside the building, and only be utilized after business hours.

Design Guidelines
» A building’s awnings should all have the same color
scheme; awning signs may vary in type, style, and color to differentiate individual businesses within a building.

Storefronts should have recessed entries, permeable
displaywindows made of clear glass, and awnings over
both.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐19
Building Design
Downtown Redding not only serves as the heart of the
community, but also as the strongest visual image of the community. These visual impressions affectthe way Redding residents and visitors feel about the City and are often an indication of the community’s economic vitality.

Design Standards
The design standards presented herein are intended to
foster good design in order to create a quality image for Downtown Redding, encourage reinvestment, and improve
the Downtown Redding’s economic vitality in general.

The following design standards are applicable to all new development within the Specific Plan area and are illustrated in Figure 6.3.
■ Articulations such as recesses, reveals, changes in
materials, and canopies/awningsshall be used to avoid
blank walls.
■ New horizontal building additionsto existing structures shall match the originalstructure in terms ofscale, roof line, materials, and color.
■ Roof‐mountedmechanical equipmentshallbe screened
with a material that matches the architectural style of Design Guidelines
» Avoid blank walls at the ground floor by utilizing
windows, recesses, reveals, changes in materials, and
canopies to create visual interest.
» Additionsto existing buildingsshould be integrated with the existing structure’s window and door styles and
openings.
» Vary rooflines with parapets, cornices, and other fea‐ tures to create interesting rooflines.
» Introducing or changing the location or size of windows or other openingsthat disruptthe architecturalrhythm,
alignment or character of the original building is not
recommended.
» Accentuate doors with decorative details and/or attrac‐ tive painted signs.
the building and is integrated into
itsdesign.
■ All utilities, such as backflow
pre‐ vention devices, groupings
of meters, etc., shall be located
outside the public right‐of‐
way, within a building
recess,    utility    room,
or landscaped   area,
and be fully screened
from public view. A
combination of elements
can be used to screen utility,
trash, and recycling areas, including
solidmasonry walls, berms, and
landscaping.

FIGURE 6.3: BUILDING MASSING

AND ARTICULATION
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐20 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Landscaping/Hardscape Design
Landscaping in Downtown Redding should achieve four
specific ends: 1)to beautify Downtown Redding and create a gateway to the city; 2)to soften commercial development; 3) to unify the area as a pleasant environmentforresidents and visitorsalike;and4)toprovideshadeforpedestrians,parking, vehicles, and bicycles. These four ends will be accomplished by a recognizable use of repeated planting treatments.

Consistency and continuity within the street right‐of‐way and building setback areas is extremely important.

New development in Downtown Redding should refer to
the following landscape guidelines, the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, and the Downtown Redding Street Tree
Management Plan.

Design Standards
■ Refer to the Downtown Redding Street Tree Manage‐
ment Plan when planting and/or removing trees in the
public right‐of‐way.
■ Trees and Shrubs shall be a minimum of 15‐gallon and
5‐gallon size, respectively, at the time of planting.
■ All landscaped areas are to be well‐maintained and free of weeds and debris; when adjacent to public right‐of‐
way, they shall maintain pedestrian access.
■ Planting shall create and maintain a clear view by keep‐ ing low plants to under 3 feet in height, and tree limbs pruned up to no lower than 7 feet in height.
■ Any unutilized areas are to be landscaped in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18.47.

Maintainedmature streettrees provide shade and define the edestrian path.

Design Guidelines
» Ground‐level landscaping and hardscape detailing
should be used at the ground level to soften the im‐
pact of large buildings.
» Use potted plants in quality, appropriately sized
planters, especially for enhancement of sidewalk
shops.
» Vines and climbing plants integrated upon building
and perimeter garden and building walls are encour‐
aged.
» When effective screening is needed, appropriate
plant materials should be selected to be capable of
growing to the height and density desired within a
reasonable period of time.
» Landscaping material, so long as it is properly main‐ tained, is the preferred method to obscure the view
of any parking orstorage area adjacentfroma public
street or pedestrian area.

Building mass is softened with landscaping and trees.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6‐21
Parking, Circulation, and Access
Design Standards
■ New public and commercial parking structures in the
Downtown Core District shall comply with the applica‐
ble use permit conditions of approval which pertain to
design.
■ Parking that is accessory to an on‐site use shall comply with all applicable standards of this Plan and with the screening and landscape standards of ZoningOrdinance
Section 18.41.100. The screening and landscape stan‐
dards of Zoning Ordinance Section 18.41.100 shall not
apply to parking when it is the primary use of a site.
■ New projects in the Downtown Mixed Use District shall locate surface parking lots behind buildings. Where the property is a corner lot, the surface parking lot may
occupy no more than 50 percent of the dimension on
the secondary street frontage. See Figure 6.4.
■ Where new projects in the Downtown Mixed Use Dis‐
trict are adjacent to an alley, access to parking shall be from the alley. Where properties do not abut an alley,
access may be from the street but may take up no more
than 20 percent of the frontage dimension. See Figure

6.4. A parking garage with artistic Art Deco screening
allowspassersby to see in.

FIGURE 6.4: PARKING AND ACCESS
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6‐22 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Design Guidelines
» Common shared‐access driveways which provide access
to more than one site are encouraged in orderto reduce
the number of driveway curb cuts along Downtown
Redding streets.
» Parking areas should be separated from buildings by
either a raised concrete walkway or landscaped strip.

Parking stalls directly abutting buildings are not desir‐ able.
» Whenever possible, locate parking lot entries on side streets in order to minimize pedestrian/vehicular con‐
flicts along the primary street. When thisis not possible, design the primary site entry with decorative stamped
concrete or pavers to differentiate it from the sidewalk. » Parking structures should be designed to fit in with the Downtown Redding urban fabric.
» Wrap parking structures with active ground‐floor uses, such as retail, office, or residential units or lobbies that mask the ground floor so the structures enhance the
physical atmosphere of Downtown Redding.
» The design of parking structures should permit max‐
imum opportunities for natural surveillance into and
from the structures.

These parking garages are wrapped with ground‐floor
retail spaces; upper floors are articulated with faux
windowsinkeepingwiththedesignofthebuilding’sfacade
modulation, or screened with an artistic, permeable
facade. Staircases are designed to be visible from the
street.

Parking lots should be landscaped with clear pedestrian walkways; shade structures help to designate such areas.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6 ‐22 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
6‐22
Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Chapter 6
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 1

ADDENDUM TO A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021
General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449
Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450
Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449, Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450, and Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361 associated with the adoption of the proposed Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update (“Plan”).

The Plan was adopted in 2001, amended in 2010 and again in 2018. The vision of the update is to continue to create a revitalized Downtown Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of historical and natural resources, and which has a lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities, inviting to residents and visitors alike. The update would modify the Specific Plan area boundary (see attached Location Map), change the zoning and general plan land use classification of certain properties (see attached Zoning Map and General Plan Map), and would modify the land use regulations, development standards, design standards and guidelines of the Specific Plan.

The adoption of a specific plan is established through the authority granted to the City of Redding by the California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457 (Specific Plans). Specific plans may be adopted by resolution or by ordinance. This allows cities to choose whether their specific plans, or portions thereof, will be policy-oriented or regulatory in nature. The Plan was adopted as a hybrid that included three distinct zoning districts (Central Business District, Uptown Business District, and Southern Gateway District) within a portion of the Plan area and provided the same regulatory structure, such as permitted uses and development standards, as other zoning districts in the City. The regulations of each of these districts were crafted specifically to address development issues within the Plan area. The amendment to the Plan in 2018 simplified the zoning districts into two districts (Core District and Mixed-Use District) to better match the existing and desired development in Downtown and cover the entire Plan area. The proposed update would expand the Mixed-Use District to the east. The goals, strategies, development standards, design guidelines and procedures in the Plan Update provide direction as new development, redevelopment, future planning, and public-improvement efforts occur within the Specific Plan area.

The boundaries of the Plan area are proposed to be expanded to redefine the area considered to be Downtown Redding. This revision would include blocks in the east that are residential and institutional. This area would economically benefit from the expansion. The proposed Plan boundary is generally defined as the area from Riverside Drive and Trinity Street to the north, Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 2 Court Street to the west, Continental Street and Sequoia Street to the east, and Lincoln Street and Cypress Avenue to the south. The land use pattern south of Shasta Street and north of South Street, between the Union Pacific Railroad tracks and East Street make up the Downtown Core District.

The Downtown Core District boundary represents the densest part of Downtown and aligns with the existing Highrise Building Height Overlay District. The proposed area consisting of institutional uses are within the existing Highrise Building Height Overlay District as well. The remaining expansion area to the east and southeast of the Downtown Core District within the proposed Plan area include less intensive land uses and buildings and are proposed to be within the Downtown Mixed-Use District.

REVISED IMPACT ANALYSIS
Although land use regulations, development standards, entitlement processes, and design standards and guidelines affecting properties with the proposed expansion Plan area would be modified as a result of the Plan Update, the proposal would not allow urban development to occur in any areas where the same or similar types of urban development are not presently permitted.

The expansion to include the public facilities and multiple family areas is an area that was previously excluded. At this time, staff is of the opinion that bringing these areas back into the Specific Plan would bring economic benefit to these properties. The northern portion, north of Placer Street is currently zoned “PF” Public Facilities; building heights to be determined by use permit; or “GO” General Office; building heights allowed up to 50 feet; and contains the “BH” Building Height Overlay District, which allows building heights to exceed the limitations of the base zoning districts by use permit. Bringing this area back into the Specific Plan would place this area in the Midrise Building Height Overlay Districts which allows height up to 75 feet. Overall, the inclusion of this area would not change in height limits already afforded under the current “BH” Building Height Overlay District.

The multiple family zoned areas proposed to be included are predominantly developed with multiple family development and have been developed beyond the allowed base density under the existing “RM-10” Multiple Family Zoning District. The inclusion into the Specific Plan would bring these properties into conformance since the Specific Plan allows up to 30 units per acre.

The inclusion of the Butte Street would bring economic benefit to the already legal nonconforming development along Butte Street. Most of the structures do not meet setbacks which has limited redevelopment of this area. Further, the “GO” General Office district does not allow for the convenient type uses that would benefit the adjacent Garden Tract neighborhood.

The current zoning along Butte Street, east of Continental Street, is within the “GO” General Office and “GC-VR” General Commercial-Visitor Retail” Zoning Districts. The height limit is 50 feet and 45 feet, respectively. The maximum height limit in the proposed Mixed-Use District is 75 feet, which exceeds the existing respective zoning districts. However, by reducing the height limit to a maximum of 35 feet for developments on properties adjacent to a single-family zoning district, would mitigate the impact to the adjacent single-family neighborhood and would still accommodate for varied pitch roof designs for two-story construction, which is a requirement in the Mixed-Use District.

Adoption of the Plan Update would not negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 3 proposed Plan and amendments to Title 18 will have a significant effect on the environment.

Furthermore, there is no evidence in light of the whole record that the proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram will negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region. The Plan reflects and implements the numerous General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding as well as the Downtown Focus Area Development Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element. The adoption and implementation of the Plan Update is anticipated to positively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding area by facilitating the achievement of the Plan's vision to *create a revitalized Downtown Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of historical and natural resources..." by having a lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities, inviting to residents and visitors alike." The Plan is necessary to properly implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The Implementation section of the General Plan identifies the adoption of a Specific Plan and Development Guidelines for Downtown Redding to address the following: Appropriate land use classifications; desired mixed-use concepts; public gathering places; building scale and mass; facade and overhang treatments; Downtown circulation and streetscape; parking and parking structures; and linkage to other districts. The Updated Plan addresses the aforementioned issues relative to current conditions and the community's present long-term vision for Downtown Redding. It is important to assess the adequacy of adopted specific plans from time to time to ensure that they remain effective in implementing General Plan goals and policies and in achieving the community's evolving vision for specific plan areas. The intent of the Plan Update is to improve upon the implementation of the General Plan goals and polices pertaining to Downtown Redding.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65454, the Plan Update is consistent with the General Plan's goals and policies. Appendix A of the Plan Update identifies the goals and policies of the Community Development and Design Element, Transportation Element, Natural Resources Element, Health and Safety Element, Recreation Element, Economic Development Element, Housing Element, Public Facilities and Services Element, and Air Quality Element of the General Plan which pertain to Downtown Redding. For the following reasons, the Plan reflects and implements the numerous General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding as well as the Downtown Focus Area Development Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element:

1. The Community Development and Design Element provides guidance on development with specific focus areas of the City, including the Downtown Focus Area. The General Plan states that Downtown should present a more urban character than the rest of the City in order to distinguish it from the City's other commercial districts. The land use regulations, development standards, and design standards and guidelines of the Plan are reflective of urban development patterns, concepts, and styles, which will further distinguish the character of Downtown from the City's other commercial districts.

2. The Health and Safety Element promotes the reduction of criminal activity through proper site design and land use planning and a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community. The Plan directly supports the goals and policies of the Health and Safety Element through its promotion of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles and active ground floors along street frontages, nighttime activities, and residential uses to increase foot traffic and provide more eyes on the street and public realm.

Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 4

3. The goals and policies of the Recreation Element support the development of a citywide recreational trail system, separating bicyclists and pedestrians from vehicular traffic and pedestrian facilities from bicycle facilities whenever feasible, and increasing the acreage and quality of developed park facilities. The open space, public realm, incentives for activation, streetscape, bicycle, and wayfinding implementation strategies of the Plan support the goals and policies of the Recreation Element through the establishment of new public parks and open spaces, activating parks and open spaces with public art, establishing pedestrian and bicycle facility priorities, conceptual streetscape improvement cross sections, a comprehensive wayfinding system, and plans for the safe and efficient connectivity between Downtown, the recreational trail system, and other bicycle facilities in the vicinity of Downtown.

4. The Plan directly supports the goals and policies of the Economic Development Element through its economic development goals and implementation strategies and its Implementation Action Plan. The Implementation Action Program includes measures regarding business development services and training opportunities, establishment of a Downtown Business Association, start-up business services and assistance, development of an available sites and buildings inventory, provision of incentives to attract desired types of development and businesses, and establishment of gap financing and micro-loan programs.

5. The goals and policies of the Housing Element promote infill development where adequate public services exist, the facilitation of mixed-use development, and the provision of a wide range of housing choices in the community. The appropriate mix of 'uses implementation strategies of the Plan support the goals and policies of the Housing Element by allowing for a mix of uses, including residential, throughout the entire Plan area, encouraging land uses that attract residents to Downtown, and allowing for a variety of housing opportunities, including mixed-use developments, loft apartments, and zero lot-line cottages and townhomes.

6. The Plan directly supports the goal and related policies of the Air Quality Element to reduce motor vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled by allowing for increased mixed-use development and residential densities and supporting a balance between all modes of transportation, including active (non-motorized) transportation modes.

DETERMINATION
The City of Redding previously prepared a Negative Declaration for the Plan, which was adopted on February 6, 2001 and subsequently adopted an Addendum to the Negative Declaration on April 3, 2018. Based upon a review of the proposed amendments to the Plan, it has been determined that an addendum to the previously adopted Negative Declaration is appropriate because none of the following conditions (pursuant to CEQA Section 15162) have occurred:

1. Substantial changes are proposed for the project that will require major revision of the previous Negative Declaration due to new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 5

2. New information of substantial importance indicates that:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration.
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Negative Declaration.
c. Mitigation measures previously 'found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt them.
d. Mitigation Measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the project proponents decline to adopt them.

FINDINGS

1. The City of Redding has determined that an addendum is warranted, finding that none of the above conditions are in evidence and that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the proposal will have a significant effect on the environment.

2. The Addendum to the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement and analysis of the City of Redding.

PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Pursuant to Section 15164(c) of CEQA, an addendum does not require circulation for public review.

Copies of the Addendum, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the original Initial Study may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact Lily Toy at (530) 245.7231. ____________________________ ___________________________ Date Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Development Services Department
January 5, 2022
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public MUC
PF-I

3.5 to 6
GC
GC
PF-I-S
PF-I
PK
GO
GO
GC MUC
PF-I
LO
20 to 30
HC
MUC
GO
GWY
6 to 10
20 to 30
6 to 10
6 to 10
PF-I-S
GO
GC
6 to 10
PF-I
GO
LO
NC
NC
6 to 10
PF-I
PK
GWY
GWY
GO
MUC
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
D
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
idge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Ca
n
al Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Proposed General Plan Land Use
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Proposed General Plan Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update)

ADDENDUM TO A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration
For the City of Redding Zoning Map
Rezoning RZ-2021-00450
Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021

SUBJECT
Zoning Map Amendment to expand the Downtown Redding Specific Plan boundary to include the properties east of East Street and along Butte Street to Sequoia Street as depicted as the Specific Plan Proposed Addition area in the attached location map.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Redding Zoning Map was comprehensively updated and adopted on December 17, 2002.

The City now proposes to amend the zoning designation of the subject properties from “GO-BH” General Office-Building Height Overlay District, and “PF-BH” Public Facility-Building Height Overlay District to “DMUD-SP-BH” Downtown Mixed Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District–Building Height Overlay District, and from “GC-VR” General Commercial-Visitor and Retail, “GO” General Office, and “RM-10” Residential Multiple Family-10 units per acre to “DMUD-SP” Downtown Mixed Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The expansion to include the public facilities and multiple family areas was previously excluded.

Bringing these areas back into the Specific Plan would bring economic benefit to these properties.

The northern portion, north of Placer Street is currently zoned “PF” Public Facilities; building heights to be determined by use permit; or “GO” General Office; building heights allowed up to 50 feet; and contains the “BH” Building Height Overlay District, which allows building heights to exceed the limitations of the base zoning districts by use permit. Bringing this area back into the Specific Plan would place this area in the Midrise Building Height Overlay Districts which allows height up to 75 feet. Overall, the inclusion of this area would not change in height limits already afforded under the current “BH” Building Height Overlay District.

The multiple family zoned areas proposed to be included are predominantly developed with multiple family development and have been developed beyond the allowed base density under the existing “RM-10” Multiple Family Zoning District. The inclusion into the Specific Plan would bring these properties into conformance since the Specific Plan allows up to 30 units per acre.

Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration – Zoning Map DTSP Update RZ-2021-00450-DTSP Update Page 2 The inclusion of the Butte Street would bring economic benefit to the already legal nonconforming development along Butte Street. Most of the structures do not meet setback standards leading to limited redevelopment of the area. Further, the “GO” General Office district does not allow for the convenient type uses that would benefit the adjacent Garden Tract neighborhood.

The proposed amendment will reclassify the properties currently designated “GO-BH” General Office-Building Height Overlay District, and “PF-BH” Public Facility-Building Height Overlay District to “DMUD-SP-BH” Downtown Mixed-Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District– Building Height Overlay District, and from “GO” General Office, and “RM-10” Residential Multiple Family-10 units per acre to “DMUD-SP” Downtown Mixed-Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Map are necessary to ensure consistency with the proposed General Plan.

DETERMINATION
On December 17, 2002, the city of Redding adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the update of the City of Redding Zoning Map (Project). Based upon a review of the current amendments to the Zoning Map, it has been determined that an addendum is appropriate because the additions are minor, and none of the following conditions (pursuant to CEQA Section 15162) have occurred:

1. Substantial changes are proposed for the Project that will require major revision of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration due to new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that involve new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

3. New information of substantial importance indicates that:
a. The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration.
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration.
c. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.
d. Mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.

Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration – Zoning Map DTSP Update RZ-2021-00450-DTSP Update Page 3

FINDINGS

1. The City of Redding has determined that an addendum is warranted, finding that none of the above conditions are in evidence and that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the amendment proposal will have a significant effect on the environment.

2. The Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding.

3. Pursuant to Section 15074.1(b) of CEQA, the City of Redding finds that the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are sufficient and that the Project will not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.

PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Pursuant to Section 15164(c) of CEQA, an addendum does not require circulation for public review.

Copies of the Addendum, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the original Initial Study may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact Planning Manager Lily Toy at (530) 245.7231.
____________________________ ___________________________ Date Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Development Services Department
LT/et
Attachment: Location Map
January 5, 2022
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map (available online) (6.1--Continued Public

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO REDDING PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommendation
Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion, forward a recommendation to City Council to the adopt the proposed Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update by approving General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449, Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450, and Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361, upon a determination that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adequately complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

Background
The Downtown Redding Specific Plan (Specific Plan) was originally adopted in 2001, amended in 2010 and again in 2018. The latter update involved numerous stakeholders, community workshops, Planning Commission, and City Council meetings that were held in order to present information and preliminary proposals, as well as to solicit input and feedback pertinent to the formulation of the update.

MEETING DATE: October 26, 2021
ITEM NO. 4(b)1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)1--Recommendation to the City Council Regarding General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449, Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450, and Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361, initiated by the City of Redding Development Services Department, requesting approval of the following proposal; increasing the size of the Specific Plan area; changing the zoning of certain properties from “GO-BH” General OfficeBuilding Height Overlay District, and “PF-BH” Public Facility-Building Height Overlay District to “DMUD-SP-BH” Downtown Mixed Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District–Building Height Overlay District, and from “GC-VR” General Commercial-Visitor and Retail, “GO” General Office, and “RM-10” Residential Multiple Family-10 units per acre to “DMUD-SP” Downtown Mixed Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District, upon a determination that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adequately complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The proposal also includes amendments to the land use regulations, development standards, and other various provisions of the Specific Plan.

Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Packet Pg. 386 Packet Pg. 3 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 2
The vision of the 2018 update was to create a revitalized Downtown Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of historical and natural resources, and have a lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities inviting to residents and visitors alike. The 2018 update reduced the Specific Plan area boundary, changed the zoning and general plan land use classification of certain properties, and modified the land use regulations, development standards, parking requirements, design standards and guidelines, implementation action plan, and other various provisions of the Specific Plan.

As a result of the 2018 update, Downtown Redding has experienced a tremendous resurgence.

Public and private partnerships have allowed revitalization to take place. The reopening of streets to the core allows access to vehicles, pedestrians and bikers. The physical landscape has also changed to include 200 new residential units, new commercial and retail properties, new parking options, and the renovation of existing buildings. The vision of the 2018 update is being fulfilled.

Implementation of the Specific Plan has been well tested throughout the past three years.

Application of the regulations, standards, and guidelines as well as the streamlining of the development review and entitlement process were realized. During this time, it has been made clear that refinement to the regulations would further the revitalization of Downtown Redding and foster greater economic development and opportunities in the City core.

City staff held two stakeholder’s meetings earlier this year to gather input from interested Downtown stakeholders to ensure desired elements are included in the development of alternatives and proposed changes. Additionally, staff held a neighborhood informational meeting with the Garden Tract Neighborhood on October 19, 2021, to gather further input.

Issues
PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTER 6: REGULATIONS, STANDARDS, AND GUIDELINES ARE SUMMARIZED BELOW:
• Require all new developments including additions to the pre-application process through the Planning Division to assist in identifying any potential matters prior to submitting for building permits.
• Require a discretionary permit for the following uses:
o Mixed-Use Developments consisting of more than four dwelling units in the Core District;
o Multiple-Family Residential uses consisting of more than four dwelling units in the Core District;
o Supportive/Transitional Housing;
o College and Trade Schools including the ground floor in the Core District; o Government Offices in the Mixed-Use District;
o Clinics greater than 5,000 square feet in the Core District; o Religious Facilities greater than 5,000 square feet in the Core District; o R & D Research Facility or Offices more than 5,000 square feet in the Core District;
o Laboratories in the Core District;
o Home Improvement Sales and Services more than 5,000 square feet; o Business Services, including the ground floor;
Packet Pg. 387 Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 3
o Maintenance and Repair Services including the ground floor in the Core District; and
o Businesses with a primary use consisting of massage services. • Allow for the following uses:
o Condominiums;
o Offices, Medical and Dental less than 2,000 square feet on the ground floor in the Core;
o Clinics less than 5,000 square feet on the ground floor in the Core District; o Community Centers as a primary use including the ground floor in the Core District;
o Religious Facilities including the ground floor;
o Parking Structures, Public and Commercial without a Use Permit in the Core District;
o R & D Research Facility or Offices less than or equal to 5,000 square feet in the Core District and allow in the Mixed-Use District;
o Banks, without Drive-Thru on the ground floor in the Core District; o Automobile Rental Office in the Core District;
o Home Improvement Sales and Services less than or equal to 5,000 square feet – including Plant Nurseries with screened outdoor yards; and o Allow businesses whose primary use consists of tattoo services. • Reduce those uses requiring a Use Permit to the lesser Director Level Site Development Permit.
• Allow for monuments signs in the Mixed-Use District.
• Design standards and review process for fencing in the front of buildings at zero setback.

PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY. The area proposed to be included in the Specific Plan is generally bounded by Shasta Street to the north, Lincoln Street to the south, East Street to the west, and Park Marina Drive to the east. More than half of the proposed area was originally included in the original 2010 Specific Plan and was eliminated in the 2018 update. The concept to reducing the boundary in the 2018 update was to better define the area considered to be Downtown Redding.

Analysis
Many of the proposed changes are a result of the stake holders’ meetings and neighborhood meeting. Although land use regulations, development standards, entitlement processes, and guidelines affecting properties within the proposed expansion area would be modified as a result of the Plan Update, the proposal would not allow urban development to occur in any areas where the same or similar types of urban development are not presently permitted, with the exception of the height in Butte Street corridor.

The expansion to include the public facilities and multiple family areas is an area that was previously excluded. At this time, staff is of the opinion that bringing these areas back into the Specific Plan would bring economic benefit to these properties. The northern portion, north of Packet Pg. 388 Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 4
Placer Street is currently zoned “PF” Public Facilities; building heights to be determined by use permit; or “GO” General Office; building heights allowed up to 50 feet; and contains the “BH” Building Height Overlay District, which allows building heights to exceed the limitations of the base zoning districts by use permit. Bringing this area back into the Specific Plan would place this area in the Midrise Building Height Overlay Districts which allows height up to 75 feet.

Overall, the inclusion of this area would not change in height limits already afforded under the current “BH” Building Height Overlay District.

The multiple-family zoned areas proposed to be included are predominantly developed with multiple family development and have been developed beyond the allowed base density under the existing “RM-10” Multiple Family Zoning District. The inclusion into the Specific Plan would bring these properties into conformance since the Specific Plan allows up to 30 units per acre.

The inclusion of the Butte Street would bring economic benefit to the already legal nonconforming development along Butte Street. Most of the structures do not meet setbacks which has limited redevelopment of this area. Further, the “GO” General Office district does not allow for the convenient type uses that would benefit the adjacent Garden Tract neighborhood. Further, the inclusion of the Butte Street corridor would connect the Specific Plan to the adjacent Redding Riverfront Specific Plan Area at the SR44 on/off ramp, thereby creating a convergence of two distinct areas at a major juncture.

The current zoning along Butte Street, east of Continental Street, is within the “GO” General Office and “GC-VR” General Commercial-Visitor Retail” Zoning Districts. The height limit is 50 feet and 45 feet, respectively. The maximum height limit in the proposed Mixed-Use District is 75 feet, which exceeds the existing respective zoning districts. Following the input received by the Garden Tract group, regarding their concern on the height of structures and its impact onto a single-family neighborhood, staff is proposing the following alternative for consideration.

ALTERNATIVE – REDUCED HEIGHT. Reduce the height to a maximum of 35 feet for developments on properties adjacent to a single-family zoning district. This would accommodate for varied pitch roof designs for two-story construction, which is a requirement in the Mixed-Use District.

Reducing the restrictions for office uses, banks and other uses on the ground floor in the Core District would allow for a variety of uses that are pedestrian oriented to be more accessible. This was one of the options made available during the 2018 update.

Reducing the uses that currently require a use permit to a Director Level Site Development Permit would further streamline the process which is one of the goals of this update.

There are currently many monument signs in the Specific Plan area, particularly in the MixedUse District. Currently, the plan prohibits monuments signs in the Specific Plan area and thereby, making all the existing signs legal non-conforming, which limits the ability to perform major alterations to these signs. Addressing monument signs in the Mixed-Use District would alleviate the legal non-conforming and allow these signs to be permitted and allow major alterations, including relocation, and major design upgrades. Overall, this would enhance Downtown Redding.

Packet Pg. 389 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 5
Regarding the fences, the Specific Plan does not address fencing, particularly within the areas in front of buildings. In order to preserve the aesthetics along the street, staff recommends the incorporation of a standard and process to allow for fencing in the front of a building.

Environmental Determination
Staff has determined that the preparation of an Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan is appropriate under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the proposed update to this plan (see attached Addendum). The preparation of an addendum to a previously adopted environmental document is specifically provided for under CEQA to address minor technical changes to a previously approved project that do not alter the findings and determination of the adopted environmental document.

Public Comment
Staff has received a public comment, attached, requesting the Planning Commission to delay consideration on the proposed amendments to allow the Garden Tract property owners time to understand any impacts the proposal may have onto their neighborhood.

Planning Commission Authority
RMC Section 18.10.030.B.5, authorizes the Planning Commission to make recommendations to the City Council on General Plan amendments; Specific Plans and amendments to Specific Plans; and amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Text or Zoning Map.

Alternatives
The following alternatives are offered for consideration:

1. Recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments and rezoning.

2. Recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments and rezoning including the alternative to reduce the building heights to 35 feet on properties located adjacent to a residential single-family zoning district. (Staff’s Recommendation)

3. Direct staff to modify the proposed amendments prior to consideration by the Council.

Should changes be requested, the Commission should provide clear direction to staff.

Conclusion
The proposed update captures the community’s vision to continue to revitalize Downtown Redding. The vision of the proposed update is to continue to facilitate the realization of the vision of the 2018 Update through the application of appropriate regulations, standards, and guidelines as well as through the streamlining of the development review and entitlement process. Partnerships have continued to be bolster the community’s determinate to revitalize and transform Downtown Redding. With the proposed revisions to the proposed update, attached to this report, and any additional revisions deemed appropriate by the Commission, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the Packet Pg. 390 Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 6
Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update with the inclusion of the 35 feet height limit as discussed above.
c: Downtown Stake Holders
Interested Parties
Attachments
Location Map
Zoning
Proposed Zoning
General Plan
Proposed General Plan
Draft SP Plan Chapter 6 Redlined Version
Addendum to Negative Declaration
Public Comment
Downtown Redding Specific Plan (available online)
Packet Pg. 391 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Information only.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to accepting the report.

Background/Analysis
Following the annual reorganization of the City Council, the City Council liaison assignments have been reviewed and modified. Attached for the City Council’s information is the updated list of Departmental, Commission, Committee, and Agency liaison assignments.

Appointments made by the Mayor’s City Selection Committee are contingent upon the decision of the Committee at their annual meeting.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This is routine operational item occurring on an annual basis.

Attachments
2022 Liaison List by Agency
2022 Final Liaison List by Member
MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 9A
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9A--City Council Liaison Assignments for Calendar Year 2022.

City Council
Packet Pg. 392
2022 CITY OF REDDING CITY COUNCIL

AGENCY, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, AND DEPARTMENTAL LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES By Agency
CITY DEPARTMENTS Liaison
City Clerk Schreder
City Treasurer-Finance Dacquisto
Community Services Schreder
Development Services Resner
Electric Utility (Includes outside energy-related agencies Winter Fire Mezzano
Housing Schreder
Information Technology Schreder
Personnel Mezzano
Police Resner
Public Works-Engineering; Transportation; Airport; Fleet Mezzano Public Works-Water; Wastewater; Storm Drain; Solid Waste Winter CITY COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES Liaison Alternate
Audit Committee (Mayor/Vice Mayor) Schreder
Dacquisto
Community Development Advisory Committee Schreder
Community Services Advisory Commission Schreder
Planning Commission Resner
Shasta Public Library Citizens' Advisory Committee Dacquisto Native American Liaison Winter
OTHER AGENCIES Representative Alternate
Downtown Collaborative (2 Reps + 1 Alt) Schreder Resner Winter
Economic Development Corporation Dacquisto Resner
Enterprise Anderson Groundwater Sustainability Agency (EAGSA) Resner Mezzano League of California Cities Resner Winter
NSVIRWM Goverance Board (COR has an Alternate to the Board) Resner n/a Redding Area Water Council - Policy Advisory Committee Resner n/a Public Access TV (Shasta County Arts Council) Schreder n/a Shasta County Community Action Board Schreder n/a
Shasta County Remote Access Network Advisory (RAN) Mezzano n/a Youth Violence Prevention Council of Shasta County Resner n/a **CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE Representative Alternate
Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) (2 Reps + 1 Alt) Dacquisto Resner Mezzano
Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) (1 Rep + 1 Alt) Mezzano Dacquisto Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Dacquisto n/a Superior California Economic Development District (SCEDD) Director n/a Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) For COR Schreder Dacquisto Rev: 01/11/2022
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: 2022 Liaison List by Agency (9A--City Council Liaison Assignments for Calendar Year 2022) 2022 CITY OF REDDING CITY COUNCIL AGENCY, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE, AND

DEPARTMENTAL LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES

BY COUNCIL MEMBER
All Five City Council Members serve on the following: Redding Area Bus Authority; Redding Capital Services; Redding Housing Authority; Redding Joint Powers Financing Authority; Redding Municipal Library Board; and Successor Agency to the Redding Redevelopment Agency.

Council Member - Erin Resner Mayor - Kristen Schreder
Development Services Community Services
Police Housing
Youth Violence Prevention Council of Shasta County Information Technology Planning Commission Audit Committee
League of California Cities Community Development Advisory Committee Enterprise Anderson Groundwater Sustainability Agency
(EAGSA)
Community Services Advisory Commission
Redding Area Water Council – Policy Advisory Committee Public Access TV (Shasta County Arts Council) NSVIRWM Governance Board Shasta County Community Action Board City Clerk
Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA)
ALTERNATE Downtown Collaborative
Downtown Collaborative
Economic Development Corp ALTERNATE – N/A
Air Pollution Control Board (APCB)
Mayor Pro Tempore - Mark Mezzano Council Member - Julie Winter Personnel Electric Utility
Public Works – Engineering, Transportation, Airport, Fleet Public Works – Water, Wastewater, Storm Drain, Solid Waste Shasta County Remote Access Network Advisory (RAN) Downtown Collaborative Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) Native American Liaison Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC)
Fire

ALTERNATE ALTERNATE
Enterprise Anderson Groundwater Sustainability Agency (EAGSA) League of California Cities Vice Mayor - Michael Dacquisto
City Treasurer – Finance
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
Shasta Public Library Citizens Advisory Committee
Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) NOTE: The SRTA RABA Representative and Alternate Economic Development Corporation to be selected at RABA’s next meeting (must be from COR).

Audit Committee (Mayor/Vice Mayor)
NOTE: **Appointments made by the Mayor’s City
ALTERNATE Selection Committee are tentative until after their Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) meeting in mid-January.

Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) For COR
Rev: 1/11/2022
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: 2022 Final Liaison List by Member (9A--City Council Liaison Assignments for Calendar Year 2022)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the Audit Committee’s recommendation to accept the Statement on Auditing Standards AU-C 260 Letter and the draft copy of the Single Audit Reports for the year ended June 30, 2021.

Fiscal Impact
None
Alternative Action
The City Council can reject the AU-C 260 Letter and the draft copy of the Single Audit Reports for the year ended June 30, 2021, and provide additional direction to the Audit Committee and/or staff.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a copy of the Statement on Auditing Standards AU-C 260 Letter to the City Council and a draft copy of the Single Audit Reports for the year ended June 30, 2021. The Audit Committee met on January 5, 2022, to review and discuss the reports. The Audit Committee recommended that the AU-C 260 Letter and the draft of the Single Audit Reports be brought to the City Council for acceptance.

The AU-C 260 Letter is commonly known as the ‘The Auditor’s Communication with those Charged with Governance’ and provides the auditors the forum to share their perspective on accounting policies, estimates, and disclosures used in the preparation of the financial statements and whether there were any difficulties, disagreements, or other findings in performing the audit.

The auditors found no problems or issues to convey.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 9B
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected],
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9B-Consider Reports from Independent Auditors for the year ended June 30, 2021.

Kristen Schreder, Mayor,
Michael Dacquisto, Vice
Mayor
Packet Pg. 395
Report to Redding City Council January 9, 2022
Re: 9B--Reports from Independent Auditors for the year ended June 30, 2021 Page 2 The Single Audit Reports pertain to the compliance and internal control in the expenditure of federal awards and the collection and expenditure of passenger facility charges. No findings or questioned costs were noted in the reports.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This is a routine operational item occurring on an annual basis Attachments
City of Redding ACFR _AU-C 260 Letter 2021_FINAL (available online) 2021_Redding_Single Audit_FINAL (available online)
Packet Pg. 396
December 21, 2021
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Redding
Redding, California
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements (“financial statements”) of the City of Redding (“City”) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2021, and have issued our report thereon dated December 21, 2021. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 21, 2021, on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters.

The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our audit and information about our responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information in our engagement letter with the City dated June 1, 2021. Professional standards also require that we communicate to you the following additional information related to our audit:

Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices
Accounting Policies
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 to the basic financial statements. Other than those standards described below that were implement in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, no new accounting policies were adopted nor was the application of existing policies changed:

GASB Statement No. 84
In January 2017, GASB issued Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities. to improve guidance regarding the identification of fiduciary activities for accounting and financial reporting purposes and how those activities should be reported. The statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments.

It also provides for recognition of a liability to the beneficiaries in a fiduciary fund when an event has occurred that compels the government to disburse fiduciary resources. To implement the requirements of the statement, the City established beginning net position of its custodial funds within its fiduciary funds in the amount of $3.8 million to account for activities previously reported as agency funds.

GASB Statement No. 90
In August 2018, GASB issued Statement No. 90, Majority Equity Interests– an Amendment of GASB Statements No. 14 and No. 61. This Statement improves the consistency and comparability of reporting a government’s majority equity interest in a legally separate organization and to improve the relevance of financial statement information for certain component units. It defines a majority equity interest and specifies that a majority equity interest in a legally separate organization should be reported as an investment if a government’s holding of the equity interest meets the definition of an investment. A majority equity interest that meets the definition of an investment should be measured using the equity method, unless it is held by a special-purpose government engaged only in fiduciary activities, a fiduciary fund, or an endowment (including permanent and term endowments) or permanent fund. Those governments and funds should measure the majority equity interest at fair value. Application of this statement did not have a material effect on the City’s financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021. 2121 North California Blvd., Suite 290,Walnut Creek, California 94596 Tel: 925-974-3394 • Fax: 949-777-8850
www.pungroup.cpa
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: City of Redding ACFR _AU-C 260 Letter 2021_FINAL (available online) (9B--Reports from Independent Auditors for the year ended To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Redding
Redding, California