Agenda Packet — Redding City Council, February 15, 2022 (part 5 of 5)

CITY OF REDDING

BENTON AIRPARK
Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and
Magnetic Variations (MAGVAR) Updates Project
Construction Administration Scope of Services
AIP No: 3-06-0308-025-2021
February 2, 2022

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This Scope of Services details the proposed Construction Administration Services to be provided by Mead & Hunt, Inc. (CONSULTANT) for the City of Redding (CITY) Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and MAGVAR Updates Project (Project) at Benton Airpark, based on the ongoing design and bidding services.

The work to be performed by the Contractor will include the elements as listed below. The construction cost for the Base Bid work is approximately $341,000 based on the Engineer’s estimate. Funding for this Project will be provided by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant and local matching funds provided by the CITY.

Base Bid work consists of the following:

A. Pavement Preservation
A surface treatment will be applied on the areas listed below in accordance with the Airport Pavement Management System (APMS. The approximate square footage of the pavement areas is 35,000 square yards.
• Runway 15-33 – 2,420 long by 80 feet wide, (Runway designation will be changed to 16-34, as discussed in Section B.)
• Connector Taxiways – 13,500 square yards
B. MAGVAR Updates
The changes due to Magnetic Variance (MAGVAR) require the runway designation numerals and associated airfield signage to be updated. Runway 15-33 will become Runway 16-34. This Project will include the replacement of the existing airfield sign legends only since the airfield signs are in good working condition.

This Construction Administration Scope of Services includes the services to be rendered by CONSULTANT after the award of a construction contract. These services are based on twenty (20) working days for Mobilization element and seven (7) working days for Construction element with a 30-day break for the final application of pavement markings (one (1) working day).

CONSULTANT will provide pre-construction services, construction administration services and postconstruction services, as detailed herein. Pre-construction and construction administration services will begin after the award of the construction contract and post-construction services will conclude within sixty (60) days of final acceptance of construction. The CONSULTANT will provide a Project Manager (PM) for the duration of the Project.

Packet Pg. 929 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Benton Airpark
Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and MAGVAR Updates Construction Administration Scope of Services
February 2, 2022

Page 2 of 8 ends

X:\3168500\182399.02\CFEE\Proposal\BTN Seal Coat and MAGVAR Construction Admin Scope Final.docx

CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
This Scope for Construction Administration Services is divided into the following Sections:

Section 1 – Project Management
Section 2 – Pre-Construction Services
Section 3 – Construction Administration
Section 4 – Construction Observation
Section 5 – Material Testing (Not in Contract)
Section 6 – Post Construction Services
The services to be provided by CONSULTANT are detailed in the following Sections and Tasks.

SECTION 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Project management is a set of interrelated actions and processes performed by the CONSULTANT to identify, assemble, and employ appropriate resources to accomplish the Scope of Services.

The CONSULTANT will use correspondence and administration to accomplish project management, which is expected to include: development of schedule, and agreement; assignment of appropriate staff and resources; monitoring of scope, budget, and schedule to determine status, action, and effort; invoicing and reporting (expected monthly).

A Project Manager (PM) will be assigned to the Project and will be responsible for the overall administration and review of construction progress. Work will be performed under the supervision of the PM, with the assistance of office-based engineering staff supporting the PM. A Resident Project Engineer (RPR) will also be assigned to the Project to perform construction observation and monitor construction activities, further described in Section 4 of this Scope. The PM will review the Project and conduct periodic site visits as detailed in Section 3.

SECTION 2 PRE-CONSTRUCTION
Task 2.1 Pre-Construction Conference
CONSULTANT will coordinate and conduct the pre-construction conference. The PM and RPR will establish this meeting to review FAA and Project-specific requirements prior to commencing construction.

The meeting will be conducted at the Airport and will include CITY representatives, FAA Airports District Office staff (if possible), Contractor, subcontractors, and Airport tenants affected by construction, and utility companies (at discretion of the Airport). CONSULTANT will provide / perform the following under this task:
a) Schedule meeting, send invitations, provide meeting materials, and prepare exhibits. CONSULTANT will provide three (3) copies of the Project Plans (half size) and Specifications to the Contractor. b) Review the Project construction schedules provided by the Contractor prior to presentation at the preconstruction conference. The CITY will be provided with copies of all the construction schedules when received by the CONSULTANT. Contractor will provide and discuss the schedule at the preconstruction conference.

Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Benton Airpark
Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and MAGVAR Updates Construction Administration Scope of Services
February 2, 2022

Page 3 of 8 ends

X:\3168500\182399.02\CFEE\Proposal\BTN Seal Coat and MAGVAR Construction Admin Scope Final.docx c) Preside at the pre-construction conference, prepare a detailed record of the conference, submit a written record to the CITY for review and comment, and distribute the final record (minutes) to meeting attendees.
d) Review the list of required Contractor Submittals (previously prepared) prior to the pre-construction conference.

Task 2.2 Prepare Construction Documents
CONSULTANT will incorporate any addenda issued during the bidding period and issue a final construction set of the contract documents for construction.

Task 2.3 Review Submittals
CONSULTANT will review Shop Drawings and Contractor-submitted certificates for compliance with design concepts. It is expected that up to ten (10) submittals will be reviewed. The budget assumes half of the submittals will require resubmittal. The costs for additional resubmittals, in excess of two (2) for any submittal, will be the responsibility of the Contractor as stated in the Bid Documents.

Task 2.4 Prepare Construction Management Plan (CMP) – Not In Contract (NIC) Due to the nature of the Project, a CMP is not required.

Task 2.5 Quality Control / Quality Assurance Workshop
A Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA) workshop will be held, prior to construction and in accordance with FAA General Construction Provisions C-100. The Contractor will arrange for and conduct the workshop. The CONSULTANT field observation team (PM and RPR) will attend and participate in this meeting. It is anticipated that this meeting will occur at the Airport and last for approximately 1 hour and will be held concurrent with the pre-construction meeting. The primary purpose of the meeting is to discuss the Project specifications and coordinate the FAA and Project-specific Quality Control (Contractor) and Quality Acceptance (CONSULTANT) procedures and testing requirements prior to commencing construction.

Section 2 Deliverables
1) Pre-construction Meeting Minutes – Electronic files to CITY and attendees. 2) Construction Set of Construction Documents – Electronic files (pdf) and three hard copy (3) sets of plans (11x17) and specifications.
3) QC/QA Workshop Meeting Minutes – Electronic files to CITY and attendees.

SECTION 3 – CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
The CONSULTANT’s PM will provide Construction Administration Services required for the execution of the contracted work as detailed in the following tasks:

Task 3.1 Construction Administration
1) Interpretation of plans and specifications.
2) Check construction activities to obtain compliance with plans and specifications. 3) Review and provide comment on Project compliance issues for quality control testing performed by the Contractor.
4) Verify that testing required by the specifications is performed, and review materials reports prepared in accordance with the Construction Management Plan.

Packet Pg. 931 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Benton Airpark
Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and MAGVAR Updates Construction Administration Scope of Services
February 2, 2022

Page 4 of 8 ends

X:\3168500\182399.02\CFEE\Proposal\BTN Seal Coat and MAGVAR Construction Admin Scope Final.docx Task 3.2 Requests for Information (RFIs) and Change Orders CONSULTANT will prepare written responses to Contractor RFIs to clarify design intent. CONSULTANT will also assist with preparation of change orders, which include a cost estimate, cost/price analysis, and preparation and/or negotiation of necessary interpretations and clarifications, additions, and deletions to change orders, and supplemental agreements, as required. Change orders shall be submitted to the CITY for review. Up to six (6) RFIs and up to one (1) change order is anticipated for the Project.

Task 3.3 Site Visits During Construction
The PM will review the Project on a periodic site visit (one site visit anticipated) to monitor construction activities. Due to duration of the Project, only one site visit is expected but will overlap for two days.

Task 3.4 Weekly FAA Progress reports
Review and submit weekly reports prepared by the RPR as to the progress of the Project. Up to five (5) weekly reports are anticipated.

Task 3.5 Progress Payment Review
Prepare and submit periodic estimates, including the final estimate, during the construction project.

Determine the amount owed to the Contractor and recommend those payment amounts in writing to the Contractor. Submit periodic payment recommendations to the CITY for concurrence and the FAA for federal participation payment requests. Up to three (3) progress payments are anticipated. The payment recommendations will demonstrate that work has progressed to the point indicated for payment and that, to the CONSULTANT’s knowledge and information the quality of such work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. The CONSULTANT, as an experienced and qualified professional, will make payment recommendations from information provided by the Contractor, reviewed from payment applications and accompanying data and schedules, and/or measured in the field.

Task 3.6 Certified Payroll and Davis Bacon Requirements Review Contractor submitted payroll reports and monitor Contractor’s compliance with paying employees, per the Davis-Bacon Act requirements. Up to three (3) weeks of payroll reports are anticipated.

Task 3.7 DBE Program Annual Reporting – NIC
Section 3 Deliverables
1) Review of Contractor submittals – Electronic files to CITY and Contractor. 2) Weekly FAA Progress Reports – Electronic files to the CITY and FAA. 3) Monthly Contractor Progress Payment Breakdown – Electronic files to the CITY. 4) Change Orders – Electronic files to the CITY, Contractor, and FAA. 5) Certified Payroll Review Analysis Reports – Electronic files to the CITY.

SECTION 4 – CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION
Task 4.1 Daily Construction Observation by Resident Project Representative (RPR) This task will include construction observation and on-site construction administration for the duration of the Project. A full-time dedicated Resident Project Engineer (RPR) will be assigned to this Project. The RPR will work with the PM to oversee the construction progress throughout the Project. The duration is anticipated to be seven (7) contractual working days with 12-hour working shifts. The budget for construction observation has been developed based upon the Construction Contractor performing daytime work on a Monday-Saturday followed by a single working day for the final application of pavement markings.

Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Benton Airpark
Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and MAGVAR Updates Construction Administration Scope of Services
February 2, 2022

Page 5 of 8 ends

X:\3168500\182399.02\CFEE\Proposal\BTN Seal Coat and MAGVAR Construction Admin Scope Final.docx Three (3) additional days were allotted for the RPR at the beginning and end of construction for travel, setup, and clean-up, for a total of ten (10) days.

The RPR will be on-site, as outlined in the construction observation schedule, to coordinate and schedule staff, answer questions, observe quality control activities, and record as-built changes. The RPR will report non-compliance issues to the CITY.

The RPR will maintain a construction diary to record the construction history of the Project. The diary will be made available to the CITY upon request for review during inspections or visits. The Project diary will include, but not be limited to, the following information: weather conditions, job site conditions, work in progress, general location of work, equipment in use, Contractor’s work force and hours worked, delivered materials, tests performed, failed tests (if any) and action taken, instructions to Contractors, record of visitors to Project and verbal or written instructions given, record of telephone conversations and any verbal instructions received or authorizations granted, engineering field force activity and hours worked, and any delays to construction and the reason for delays.

RPR construction observation services will include (as applicable), but are not limited to, the following:
a) Review and check layout and surveys conducted by the Contractor in accordance with the plans and specifications.
b) Check construction activities for compliance with plans and specifications. c) Evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by the Contractor.
d) Evaluate the Contractor’s suggestions on drawings or specifications modifications and report those suggestions to the CITY and Engineer-of Record.
e) Acquire field measurements.
f) Monitor the Contractor’s compliance with the Construction Safety and Phasing Plan and immediately bring any non-compliance issues to the attention of the Contractor. g) Monitor Contractor’s compliance with the Contractor’s Quality Control Program. h) Establish and conduct weekly construction progress meetings with the Contractor to discuss work progress and pertinent construction issues such as schedules, pavement closures, quality acceptance testing coordination, secured area access, and the need for traffic control or gate guards. i) Provide the CITY and FAA with weekly construction progress and inspection reports. j) Conduct labor interviews to be compared with the Contractor’s weekly submitted payrolls for compliance with Federal and State law on classification and wage rates. k) Receive from Contractor and review the required maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds, inspection certificates, tests, approvals, etc. as applicable. l) Conduct an inspection to determine if the work is completed and ready for final acceptance. After consultation with the CITY, the CONSULTANT will furnish the Contractor with a list of items that were observed and require completion or correction, prior to final acceptance.

This type of Project requires construction observation staff with experience in the construction oversight of airfield pavement improvement projects. For this reason, CONSULTANT staff will relocate for the duration Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Benton Airpark
Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and MAGVAR Updates Construction Administration Scope of Services
February 2, 2022

Page 6 of 8 ends

X:\3168500\182399.02\CFEE\Proposal\BTN Seal Coat and MAGVAR Construction Admin Scope Final.docx of the Project. This scope assumes the work will be completed without weather delay. The travel and per diem cost included in the proposal are as follows as defined by GSA guidelines:
a) Food Per Diem – Fixed rate of $55 per day, seven (7) days a week, for duration of the Project. b) Lodging Per Diem – Fixed rate of $96 per day, seven (7) days a week for duration of Project. c) Auto Rental – Actual cost per day +15% markup, seven (7) days a week for duration of Project. Fee estimates extended rental rate of $75 per day.

SECTION 5 – MATERIALS TESTING - NIC
All materials testing required by the specifications will be performed by the Contractor.

SECTION 6 – POST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Task 6.1 Final Inspection and Documentation
Task 6.1.1 Final Inspection
CONSULTANT will schedule and conduct a final inspection with the CITY, Contractor and FAA representatives to determine whether the Project has reached substantial completion and verify that the work is in accordance with the plans and specifications. The CONSULTANT will document items found to be deficient and will provide the Contractor a list of those items. CONSULTANT team for final inspection will include PM and RPR.

Task 6.1.2 Final Punch List
CONSULTANT will prepare a punch list correspondence to include the deficient items discovered during final inspection and will forward the correspondence to the Contractor. It will state the items in need of correction and will request a schedule for completion. The CONSULTANT will send a copy to the CITY and may include a copy in the Final Construction Report. Punch list items are anticipated to be completed during construction working days to minimize impact to airfield operations. No additional working days are anticipated for punch list items.

Task 6.1.3 Final Construction Certification
Once all the punch list items have been completed to the satisfaction of the CITY and FAA, the CONSULTANT will prepare a Sponsor Certification of Final Construction Acceptance for the Project, to be signed off by the CITY. This certification will also be included in the Final Construction Report.

Task 6.2 Record Drawings
The CONSULTANT and Contractor (Project Team) will collaboratively assemble the Project Record Drawings. The Record Drawings will detail field constructed conditions included as part of this Project. The CONSULTANT will provide the CITY with a set of reproducible Record Drawings in both digital and hardcopy format.

Task 6.3 Final Construction Report (FCR)
Once the Project is complete, an FCR will be prepared and assembled in conformance with FAA standards and requirements. Components of the report will include a summarization of the Project description, Project pay requests, change orders, Project certifications, documentation of final Project acceptance, and test results for any material testing performed during construction. As part of this task, the Project and grant closeout will be coordinated with the CITY and FAA.

Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Benton Airpark
Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and MAGVAR Updates Construction Administration Scope of Services
February 2, 2022

Page 7 of 8 ends

X:\3168500\182399.02\CFEE\Proposal\BTN Seal Coat and MAGVAR Construction Admin Scope Final.docx Section 6 Deliverables
1) Final Inspection Letter – Electronic file (pdf).
2) Final Construction Report – Two (2) bound copies and electronic file (pdf). 3) Record Drawings – One hardcopy (11x17) and electronic files.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY
This Scope of Services and compensation are based on the CITY performing or providing the following:
1) Issue Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) and announcements regarding the impact of the Project on aviation activities.
2) Guarantee access to and make all provisions for the CONSULTANT to enter upon public land as required for the CONSULTANT’s Project Team to perform the work as required under this Agreement. 3) Examine all documents requested by the CITY and presented by the CONSULTANT and render, in writing, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the CONSULTANT’s Project Team.
4) Monitor Contractor’s compliance with DBE program.
5) Preparation of reimbursement requests from grant projects.

SERVICES NOT INCLUDED
The following tasks / items are not included in this scope of services. If CITY requests that they be provided, an amendment will be prepared adding the services and associated fees:
1) Contract change orders beyond the scope of the awarded contract. 2) Extensions of construction time beyond the awarded contract timeframes. 3) FAA grant reimbursement submission.
4) Filing of Notice of Completion to the FAA.

SCHEDULE OF COMPLETION
The CONSULTANT will complete the work called for under Sections 1-5 on a schedule submitted by the Contractor and approved by the CITY. Construction is expected to begin in August 2022 and be completed by September 2022.

The CONSULTANT will complete the work called for under Section 6 within 30 working days of the receipt of a copy of the Notice of Completion filed by the CITY.

COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
The total amount for the work as detailed in this scope of services is Sixty-eight Thousand Five Hundred Forty Dollars ($68,540). Methods of compensation shall be broken out as follows:
1) For the services outlined in Section 1 Project Management, Section 2 Preconstruction Services, Section 3 Construction Administration Services, and Section 4 Construction Observation the CONSULTANT Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Packet Pg. 936
Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Attachment 1
Benton Airpark
SECTIONS and TASKS
Senior Associate /
Project Manager
Sr Proj Engineer
Project Engineer
Senior Engineer
Engineer III
Engineer II, RPR
Engineer I
Technician II
Administrative
Assistant
Clerical
Auto Rental
(Per Day)
Lodging (per Day)
Meals
(Per Day)
Reproduction
Mead & Hunt, Inc. 2022 rates $337 $261 $221 $210 $163 $151 $136 $124 $115 $90 $75 $96 $55 1

1.1 Project Management 4 8 8 $ 85.00 $ 4,121.00
Subtotal Section 1 - Project Management 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 $ 85 $ 4,121.00

2.1 Pre-Construction Conference 10 12 2 1 2 $ 500.00 $ 6,097.00

2.2 Prepare Construction Documents 2 6 2 2 $ 1,758.00

2.3 Review Submittals 2 6 14 $ 4,114.00

2.4 Prepare Construction Management Plan (CMP) - NIC $ -

2.5 Quality Control / Quality Assurance Workshop 2 2 1 $ 1,091.00 Subtotal Section 2 - Pre-construction Services 14 0 8 0 0 34 0 0 5 2 1 0 2 $ 500.00 $ 13,060.00

3.1 Construction Administration 4 8 2 $ 3,346.00

3.2 Requests for Information (RFI) (6) and Change Orders (1) 3 12 5 $ 4,238.00

3.3 Site Visits During Construction (1) 14 2 1 2 $ 5,074.00

3.4 Weekly FAA Progress Reports (5) 1 8 3 $ 2,450.00

3.5 Progress payment Review (3) 2 6 8 3 $ 3,553.00

3.6 Certified Payroll and Davis-Bacon Act Requirements 1 14 $ 1,947.00 Subtotal Section 3 - Construction Administration Services 25 0 34 0 0 8 0 0 27 0 2 1 2 $ - $ 20,608.00

4.1 Daily Construction Observation by Resident Project Representative (RPR) 110 10 10 10 $ 18,870.00 Subtotal Section 4 - Construction Observation 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 $ - $ 18,870.00

5.1 Materials Testing - NIC $ -
Subtotal Section 5 - Materials Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - Date:

Total Cost
2/2/2022
Labor Classifications and Rates
Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and MAGVAR Updates Construction Administration Scope of Services
Expenses (Cost plus 15%)
SECTION 2 - PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES (T&E)
SECTION 3 - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES (T&E)
SECTION 4 - CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION (T&E)
SECTION 5 - MATERIALS TESTING
SECTION 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT (T&E)
X:\3168500\182399.02\CFEE\Proposal\BTN Seal coat and MAGVAR CA Cost Breakdown 1 of 2 2/2/2022 Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Attachment 1
Benton Airpark
SECTIONS and TASKS
Senior Associate /
Project Manager
Sr Proj Engineer
Project Engineer
Senior Engineer
Engineer III
Engineer II, RPR
Engineer I
Technician II
Administrative
Assistant
Clerical
Auto Rental
(Per Day)
Lodging (per Day)
Meals
(Per Day)
Reproduction
Mead & Hunt, Inc. 2022 rates $337 $261 $221 $210 $163 $151 $136 $124 $115 $90 $75 $96 $55 1 Date:

Total Cost
2/2/2022
Labor Classifications and Rates
Runway and Taxiway Connector Pavement Preservation and MAGVAR Updates Construction Administration Scope of Services
Expenses (Cost plus 15%)

6.1.1 Final Inspection 10 2 1 1 1 $ 3,898.00

6.1.2 Final Punch List 2 1 $ 789.00

6.1.3 Final Construction Certification 0.5 1 1 $ 434.50

6.2 Record Drawings 1 6 14 $ 500.00 $ 3,647.00

6.3 Final Construction Report (FCR) 1 4 8 3 1 $ 248.50 $ 3,112.50 Subtotal Section 6 - Post-construction Services 14.5 0 4 0 0 17 14 0 5 1 1 1 1 $ 748.50 $ 11,881.00 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $ 68,540.00
SECTION 6 - POST-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES (Lump Sum)
X:\3168500\182399.02\CFEE\Proposal\BTN Seal coat and MAGVAR CA Cost Breakdown 2 of 2 2/2/2022 Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant MEAD & HUNT, Inc.

Standard Billing Rate Schedule
Effective January 2022
Standard Billing Rates
• Clerical ............................................................................................................................................... $90.00 / hour • Technical Editor ................................................................................................................................. $123.00 / hour • Senior Editor ...................................................................................................................................... $180.00 / hour • Registered Land Surveyor ................................................................................................................. $140.00 / hour • Accounting, Administrative Assistant ................................................................................................. $115.00 / hour • Technician I, Technical Writer ........................................................................................................... $107.00 / hour • Technician II, Surveyor - Instrument Person ..................................................................................... $124.00 / hour • Technician III...................................................................................................................................... $144.00 / hour • Technician IV .................................................................................................................................... $151.00 / hour • Senior Technician .............................................................................................................................. $189.00 / hour • Engineer I, Scientist I, Architect I, Interior Designer I, Planner I ....................................................... $136.00 / hour • Engineer II, Scientist II, Architect II, Interior Designer II, Planner II................................................... $151.00 / hour • Engineer III, Scientist III, Architect III, Interior Designer III, Planner III ............................................. $163.00 / hour • Construction Resident Project Representative (RPR) ...................................................................... $172.00 / hour • Senior Engineer, Senior Scientist, Senior Architect, Senior Interior Designer, Senior Planner, Senior Economist .............................................................................................................................. $210.00 / hour • Project Engineer, Project Scientist, Project Architect, Project Interior Designer, Project Planner .... $221.00 / hour • Senior Project Engineer, Senior Project Scientist, Senior Project Architect, Senior Project Interior Designer, Senior Project Planner................................................................... $261.00 / hour • Senior Associate, Principal, Senior Client/Project Manager .............................................................. $337.00 / hour Expenses
• Geographic Information or GPS Systems ........................................................................................ $100.00 / day • Total Station Survey Equipment ....................................................................................................... $110.00 / day Charges for other equipment may appear in a proposal
• Out-Of-Pocket Direct Job Expenses................................................................................................. cost plus 15% Such as reproductions, sub-consultants / contractors, etc.

Travel Expense
• Company or Personal Car Mileage................................................................................................... $ IRS rate / mile* * Rates will be charged at Current IRS rate
• Air and Surface Transportation......................................................................................................... cost plus 15% • Lodging and Sustenance .................................................................................................................. cost plus 15% Billing and Payment
• Travel time is charged for work required to be performed out-of-office. A minimum of two hours will be billed forany work out-of-office.
• Invoicing is on a monthly basis for work performed. Payment for services is due within 30 days from the date ofthe invoice. An interest charge of 1.5% per month is made on the unpaid balance starting 30 days after the date of invoice.

This schedule of billing rates is effective January 1, 2022, and will remain in effect until December 31, 2022, unlessunforeseen increases in operational costs are encountered. We reserve the right to change rates to reflect such increases.

Attachment 2
Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: Construction Administration Scope of Services (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding

EXHIBIT A
Revision 1

Page 1 of 11 ends

Mead & Hunt | 1360 19th Hole Drive, Suite 200, Windsor, CA 95492-7717 | 707-526-5010 | meadhunt.com

REDDING MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements
Study Scope of Services
December 29, 2021

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This Scope of Services details the design and analysis to be provided by Mead & Hunt, Inc. (CONSULTANT) for the Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements (Plan) at the Redding Municipal Airport (Airport) for the City of Redding (CITY). The Plan is an airport-wide drainage study to evaluate existing drainage conditions and proposed drainage improvements associated with the Airport’s Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) and private developments. Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer (SDS) and CGI Technical Services will be subcontracted by the CONSULTANT to assist with the Plan as SUBCONSULTANTs. The CITY will contract separately with Centurion Environmental for environmental assessments/evaluations related to this project. This Scope includes coordination with Centurion Environmental on inputs needed for this Plan.

As part of the ACIP, CONSULTANT prepared a Preliminary Design Concept Report Study (Study) for Runways 16-34 and 12-30, Taxiway Connectors and Magnetic Variation Improvements (draft dated September 30, 2021). The Study identified non-compliant transverse grades within the Runway 16-34 Safety Area (RSA). As required by the FAA, the RSA Project requires evaluation of the drainage associated with the grading modifications needed to correct the non-compliant RSA grades. The Airport has other planned infrastructure improvement projects planned as part of the ACIP and private developments that will impact existing Airport drainage infrastructure. Due to the timing of planned Runway 16-34 rehabilitation work, the Plan will be broken into two phases, the RSA Project Phase and the Remaining ACIP Projects/Private Development Phase.

The RSA Project Phase of the Plan will evaluate the impacts to lowering the Runway 16-34 RSA grades and drainage infrastructure associated with the proposed RSA improvements, primarily within the Stillwater Creek basin. This generally spans the area east of Taxiways A and M, including parts of the parking lots draining to eastbound storm drains running under these taxiways toward Stillwater Creek. The Runway 16- 34 generally drains from north to south. There are three pipes crossing the Runway 16-34: a 12” HDPE pipe at the north end, an 18” drainpipe near the north end, and a 36” RCP near the south end as shown on the CITY’s GIS database of the existing stormwater system. These pipes convey stormwater runoff across the runway. There are open and closed conveyances on the east and west side of Runway 16-34 which convey the runoff off-site to the east to Stillwater Creek. A portion of the southern end of Runway 16-34 RSA appears to drain to the southwest to Clover Creek; however, the transverse grades in this area are mostly compliant grades so it is expected the impacts within this portion of the Clover Creek watershed, will be minimal (if any). It is not expected that the Runway 16-34 improvements will result in an increase in impervious area and that improvements are generally not intended to alter the overall drainage characteristics of the site as far as watershed delineations and outfall locations.

The Remaining ACIP Projects/Private Development Phase of the Plan will assess drainage impacts from potential development sites elsewhere on Airport property, generally encompassing the area west of Taxiways A and M in addition to the extension of Runway 16-34 and parallel taxiway.

Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 2 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx The CONSULTANT understands the proposed developments are limited to the following:
a. Extension of Runway 16-34 (future 17-35), parallel taxiway, and connector taxiways (1,015 feet) b. CalFire / Forest Service Expansion Project
c. REACH development at the northeast apron
d. Hangar development north of the west T-hangars
e. Hangar development south of the West Apron
f. Terminal expansion to the south.
g. Terminal parking lot expansion within existing circular loop.

The scope of work assumes the ALP will be referenced for item “a” pavement limits. CAD files, finish ground surfaces, and stormwater conveyance structures will be provided by the CITY for item “b”, and approximate building sizes will be provided by the CITY for items “c” through “g”.

It is expected that these projects will result in an increase in impervious area on the Airport. This area of the Airport property, including the western parts of the parking lots west of Taxiways A and M, drain to Clover Creek. The extension of the runway and associated taxiways will impact the Stillwater Creek.

The Airport’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be used as the basis of evaluation of drainage inlets, drainage outlets, flow patterns, and physical installations on the Airport. The CITY maintains HEC-1 models for the Stillwater Creek and Clover Creek basins. These models will be used as the basis of the hydrologic analysis and modified based on field topographic survey information and proposed improvements for the RSA Project and Remaining ACIP Projects Phases. A field topographic survey was completed in July 2021 for the RSA Project. It is expected that additional topographic survey will be needed to complete the Plan.

A freshwater detention pond exists in the Clover Creek basin to the south of the airfield that receives runoff from the developed areas between Municipal Boulevard and Taxiway A. Impacts to this detention pond will be evaluated with the ACIP Project Phase. An environmental evaluation will be completed as part of this Plan (performed under a separate contract by the CITY) using previously prepared studies, as well as the findings of a field verification of potential jurisdictional waters and endangered species. Existing geotechnical information will be evaluated to provide guidance on geotechnical considerations associated with proposed improvements. Minor field investigations will be included to obtain representative infiltration rates for analysis.

The Plan work includes topographic surveying, coordinate with the environmental inventory (performed under a separate contract), geotechnical assessments, drainage system inventory, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, conceptual designs to guide the stormwater infrastructure improvements, and project cost estimates for proposed stormwater infrastructure improvements. The contents of the Plan will include the presentation of drainage design criteria, description of existing site conditions and drainage areas, existing conditions hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, proposed conditions hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, evaluation of proposed stormwater infrastructure improvements, and associated cost estimates.

Exhibits will depict the existing and proposed site conditions including conceptual level stormwater infrastructure improvements to comply with the design criteria.

The Plan will comply with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5320-5D – Airport Drainage Design, AC 150/5200-33 – Hazardous Wildlife Attractants at or Near Airports, and applicable local, state, and federal regulations pertaining to stormwater management and environmental protection.

Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 3 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx The Plan, as described above, will be funded by the FAA and is subject to compliance with FAA regulations and standards. The CITY will administer all grant activities.

CONSULTANT will exercise professional judgment, guided by consultation with the CITY and FAA, to determine the balance between the needs of the CITY, FAA standards, for the Plan improvements. The Plan will be developed and sealed by a California Licensed Professional Engineer.

SUMMARY OF SERVICES
The CONSULTANT’s scope of services for this airport improvements project design will be divided into four phases as follows:

Phase 1 – Project Administration and Coordination
Phase 2 – Existing Conditions Assessments
Phase 3 – Proposed Condition Assessments
Phase 4 – Airport Plan
The scope of services proposed to be provided by CONSULTANT is described in the phases and tasks as follows:

Phase 1. Project Administration and Coordination
This phase involves those activities required for preparing contract and subcontracts, and general coordination and administration.

1.0 CONTRACT AND SUBCONTRACTS PREPARATION
CONSULTANT will review the CONSULTANT—CITY contract and any necessary subconsultant contracts that CONSULTANT will use for the Project. Wet signatures will be provided on the CITY contract and subcontracts will be electronic.

2.0 PROJECT COORDINATION AND ADMINISTRATION

2.1 Project Coordination
CONSULTANT will coordinate with the design team, CITY, subconsultants, and other applicable agencies to complete the tasks associated with this scope. CITY will coordinate with FAA with support provided by the CONSULTANT as requested. CONSULTANT will conduct an in-person project kickoff meeting with the key personnel from the design team (Project Manager (PM) and representatives from each of the SUBCONULTANT(s) and the CITY.

CONSULTANT will also conduct a kickoff meeting with the internal team (including subconsultants), key personnel and support staff.

Progress meetings via teleconference will be held bi-monthly (up to 6 one-hour meetings anticipated) with the key personnel from the design team (PM and representatives from each of the SUBCONSULTANTs) and the CITY.

2.2 ACIP and Grant Administration
Up to fifteen (15) hours are included for ACIP and grant administration efforts by the Project Coordinator. These efforts will include support for the CITY and CITY’s Consultant team.

Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 4 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx

2.3 General Administration
CONSULTANT will provide general administration during the Plan development.

CONSULTANT will assign a PM to this Project to monitor continuity through the phases of work, as described in this scope. The PM will be responsible for work performed by the design team. The PM’s responsibilities will include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Define tasks, schedules, and costs.
b. Monitor work progress and address problems/issues that may arise. c. Maintain up-to-date schedules.
d. Coordinate with the CITY to receive their input, address their concerns, keep them informed regarding status, obtain their concurrence on scope, cost, and schedule; and obtain their input and approval of Plan development.
e. Focus the efforts of the CONSULTANT and subconsultants to expedite the design of a quality, cost effective Plan that meets the needs of the CITY. f. Maintain quality control on all work of the CONSULTANT and subconsultants.

Implement and monitor a program of Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA). g. Prepare invoices to submit to the CITY in accordance with the CITY’s standard invoice requirements.

Phase 1 Deliverables
1) Final Scope of Services and Fee Schedule – One (1) electronic copy 2) Executed Contracts – Two wet signed copies
Phase 2. Existing Conditions Assessments
This phase involves those activities required to establish the basis of design; and to define the existing conditions including baseline data development, geotechnical, and environmental conditions assessments, and existing conditions hydrology and hydraulic model. The deliverables for this phase will be split into two portions, the RSA Project Phase and the Remaining ACIP/Private Development Project Phase. The extents of these are identified in the Project Description section of this scope.

3.0 BASIS OF DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANT will identify the drainage design criteria based on a review of the code requirements as specified in FAA ACs, CITY, and other local, state, and federal codes pertaining to stormwater management as applicable to the site. This will be summarized in a technical memorandum for review and acceptance from the CITY and serve as the basis of design for the Plan.

4.0 BASELINE DATA DEVELOPMENT

4.1 Existing Data Collection and Review
CONSULTANT will conduct a review of available topographic survey data, as-built data, stormwater management plans and reports, City of Redding HEC-1 models and historical flood data (both numerical and empirical) for use in calibration of the existing conditions hydrology and hydraulic model. This task includes review of as-built plans and available existing survey information to gather information on existing topography, facilities, and utilities and define the limits of the topographic survey to include drainage structures, existing utility Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 5 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx lines/appurtenances and other areas of interest. CONSULTANT will review the limits with the CITY for concurrence.

An overall analysis of the existing drainage system on the Airport will be completed using the information obtained during the data collection phase. The existing conditions models will show the following:
a. Significant stormwater collection and conveyance systems on and tributary to Airport property within the Stillwater Creek and Clover Creek basins. The off-Airport tributary portions will be based on the HEC-1 models provided by the CITY and not changed with this analysis.
b. A general overview of subbasin drainage areas that contribute to each significant outlet.

This will be based on the surface characteristics, stormwater system information, and topographic contours obtained during investigation.
c. Estimates of area subtotals, such as impervious pavement (concrete or asphalt), buildings, and grass infields that contribute to each outlet or part of the system. d. Runoff totals based on a design storm, total contributing areas, and differing impervious subtotals
e. Existing drainage conditions will be determined per the City of Redding Standards.

HEC-1 will be used for hydrologic analysis and XP-SWMM will be used for hydraulic analysis the existing system as it relates to:
1) Existing system runoff
2) Detention/Retention Standards
3) Peak Flow Characteristics
4) Existing system capacity

4.2 Site Reconnaissance
CONSULTANT will conduct a site visit to evaluate existing site conditions. It is expected that two (2) CONSULTANT TEAM members will attend. CONSULTANT will coordinate access and will escort the CONSULTANT TEAM.

4.3 Topographical Surveying
SUBCONSULTANT will conduct topographic survey of limits identified during the existing data collection and review task. It is expected this will include minor additional survey associated with the RSA Project Phase and more significant survey associated with the Remaining ACIP/Private Development Project Phase. This also includes coordination for select field utility locates with CITY. SUBCONSULTANT will coordinate with field survey crews to establish survey limits, coordinate access, and establish survey schedule.

CONSULTANT will provide available survey control information. Based on existing information available, the scope assumes up to 100 hours of field work necessary to obtain the information to complete the drainage analysis.

4.4 Topographic Surveying Escort
The CONSULTANT (Engineer III or equivalent) will be responsible for escorting the topographic survey SUBCONSULTANT for up to 100 hours under a 3 week period.

Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 6 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx

4.5 Survey Data Processing
SUBCONSULTANT will incorporate the topographic survey data into the previously completed topographic survey data from July 2021 to create one seamless DTM with topographical information. This will serve as the baseline data for the existing conditions.

This work includes analyzing the topographical surveying data and preparing the data for use with computer modeling. Included are the following separate tasks:
a. Establish design coordinates.
b. Input raw survey data into the computer program in order to sort data into company standard layers for efficient analyzing.
c. Sort all data points by layers and description for computer modeling. d. Verify surveyor horizontal and vertical control.
e. Import digital terrain model (DTM) of existing ground contours, pavement edges, roadways, electrical equipment, drainage features, buildings, fences, and other miscellaneous entities.
f. Generate three-dimensional contour model from the DTM. g. Prepare and process data for pavement profiles, grading and/or paving cross sections, and drainage features.

5.0 GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION REVIEW
SUBCONSULTANT will develop a technical memorandum describing geotechnical conditions based on available records to identify potential constraints and opportunities that could affect the development of a drainage strategy for the Airport property. The desktop review will include available soils maps in the area; provide recommendations regarding infiltration potential, preliminary design infiltration rates, and infiltration limited areas, construction considerations (such as shallow bedrock and/or groundwater) and other potential considerations with regard to site geology based on technical knowledge of the site. SUBCONSULTANT will conduct approximately five (5) infiltration tests (falling head type) throughout the project areas to obtain representative infiltration rates for analysis. The CONSULTANT (Engineer III or equivalent) will be responsible for escorting the geotechnical SUBCONSULTANT for up to 8 hours under 2 site visits.

6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT COORDINATION

6.1 Environmental Conditions Assessment Coordination
The CITY will contract separately with Centurion Environmental for environmental assessments related to this project. The CONSULTANT will incorporate the recommendations provided by Centurion Environmental from their environmental constraints analysis, field verification of Potential Jurisdictional Waters and Endangered Plants, and Cultural and Historic Resource Inventory. It is assumed this will include up to four (4) onehour teleconferences attended by two (2) design team members.

Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 7 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx

7.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODELING

7.1 Subbasin Delineations
CONSULTANT will utilize the baseline data to delineate subbasins within the Stillwater Creek basin on the Airport. Baseline data will be complemented by City of Redding 2’ Lidar topographic data to provide adequate extents of the subbasin delineations and supplemented with the topographic survey data. The airport property will be subdivided with a focus on potential drainage improvement alternatives to ensure ease of comparison to the proposed conditions model. Downstream drainage areas will be drawn to route flow to locations with historical flood depth and discharge data for model calibration.

7.2 Model Parameters
CONSULTANT will obtain applicable model parameters. Rainfall depth-duration-frequency data will be obtained from the NOAA Atlas 14 database. Rainfall losses will be determined using the City of Redding HEC-1 Pre-Processor Manual along with soil data from the NRCS database and land use data developed from aerial imagery and field survey. Manning’s roughness values will be determined from field survey, aerial imagery, and engineering judgment.

7.3 Model Development
CONSULTANT will utilize HEC-1 for hydrologic analysis which is expected to be compatible with the CITY’s existing HEC-1 model. Existing stormwater management features, such as open channels, stormwater system, will be incorporated into the existing conditions hydrologic model as routing elements based on available as-built data, design reports, and survey data. These stormwater management network elements will be incorporated into an XP-SWMM hydraulic model to assess existing system capacity. Assumptions will be documented as to intended design performance associated with these features. The developed existing conditions modeling will be calibrated utilizing the historic flood stage and discharge data provided by the CITY.

7.4 Model Evaluations and Output
CONSULTANT will evaluate areas of known flooding and areas demonstrating flooding in the existing conditions modeling and summarize potential causes. CONSULTANT will conduct a work session with the CITY (via teleconference) to review the existing conditions findings. Areas of observed flooding in the modeling will be discussed with the CITY for validation based on historical observations. The existing conditions models will be finalized after input from the work session. The output from existing conditions modeling, including stormwater peak runoff rates, runoff volumes, runoff durations, runoff depths, and flooding extents, will be documented for comparison to the proposed conditions modeling and reporting in the Plan.

Phase 2 Deliverables
1) Technical Memorandums: Basis of Design and Geotechnical Assessment – One (1) electronic copy 2) Existing conditions findings for RSA Project Phase - One (1) electronic copy 3) Existing conditions findings for Remaining ACIP Projects Phase – One (1) electronic copy Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 8 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx Phase 3. Proposed Condition Assessments
This phase involves those activities required for developing the proposed conditions hydrology and hydraulic models and developing conceptual designs. The deliverables for this phase will be split into two portions, the RSA Project Phase and the Remaining ACIP Project Phase. The extents of these are identified in the Project Description section of this scope.

8.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODELING

8.1 Proposed Conditions Basemap
CONSULTANT will utilize the proposed grading improvements for the Runway 16-34 RSA. It is not expected that the Runway 16-34 improvements will result in an increase in impervious area. Assumptions will be made about grading and drainage patterns for proposed improvements based on existing topography. No design advancement of those conceptual level plans will be performed.

8.2 Subbasin Delineations
CONSULTANT will revise the existing conditions subbasins to reflect proposed condition subbasins.

8.3 Model Parameters
CONSULTANT will update applicable model parameters including infiltration parameters, Manning’s roughness values, and other applicable parameters modified in the proposed condition.

8.4 Model Development
CONSULTANT will update the existing conditions hydrologic and hydraulic models to reflect proposed condition improvements.

8.5 Model Evaluations and Output
CONSULTANT will output unmitigated stormwater peak runoff rates, runoff volumes, runoff durations, and flooding extents from the proposed condition model. These will be compared to the existing conditions output to identify areas requiring mitigation measures.

9.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS DEVELOPMENT The scope of work includes the following elements for the RSA project phase as well as the ACIP/Private Development Projects Phases.

9.1.1 and 9.1.2 Conduct Alternatives Analysis
CONSULTANT will conduct an alternatives analysis utilizing the proposed conditions model for various mitigation strategies. Potential mitigation measures include stormwater collection and conveyance (such as structures, piping, channels, safe overflows); flow control (such as detention basins, infiltration basins/trenches); erosion control measures (such as outfall protection, bank stabilization); and low impact development and water quality enhancement strategies (such as bioretention, biofiltration, infiltration, rainwater harvesting, oil/water separators, engineered media filter systems). The work effort will consider known flooding areas and proposed improvements associated with the ACIP/Private Development projects.

Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 9 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx

9.2.1 and 9.2.2 Develop Exhibit and Matrix
CONSULTANT will evaluate various alternatives for potential mitigation measures for the known flooding areas as identified in the existing conditions work session and the proposed improvements associated with the proposed improvements. CONSULTANT will develop an exhibit and a matrix summarizing the alternatives.

9.3.1 and 9.3.2 Present Alternatives to the City
The alternatives will include a qualitative assessment of each alternative and a preferred alternative recommendation for the CITY to evaluate. The proposed conditions model will be finalized with the preferred alternatives after input from the CITY. The output will be documented for reporting in the Plan.

CONSULTANT will develop a narrative description of the scope, a schematic drawing of the concept-level design, and a total cost estimate for the preferred alternative. The estimate of total cost (engineering, administrative, and construction costs) will include a breakout of federal, state, and local shares. The cost estimates will be based on the drainage work scope only.

The preferred alternative will also include an environmental review and include a description of any regulatory considerations and timeline considerations. Any impacts to protected species resulting from the preferred alternative will be documented within the BA and mitigation measures will be identified as needed. The CITY will contract separately with Centurion Environmental for environmental reviews and descriptions. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with Centurion Environmental for this information related to each alterative. It is assumed this will include up to three (3), one-hour teleconferences attended by two (2) design team members.

Phase 3 Deliverables
1) Exhibit and matrix summarizing the alternatives and recommendation of the preferred alternative for RSA Project Phase – One (1) electronic copy
2) Narrative, schematic drawing and cost estimate for the preferred alternative for RSA Project Phase – One (1) electronic copy
3) Exhibit and matrix summarizing the alternatives and recommendation of the preferred alternative for Remaining ACIP/Private Development Projects Phase – One (1) electronic copy 4) Narrative, schematic drawing and cost estimate for the preferred alternative for Remaining ACIP/Private Development Projects Phase – One (1) electronic copy Phase 4. Airport Plan
This phase involves those activities required for documenting the existing and proposed condition assessments. The deliverables for this phase will be split into two portions, the RSA Project Phase and the Remaining ACIP/Private Development Project Phase. The extents of these are identified in the Project Description section of this scope.

10.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN PREPARATION
CONSULTANT will prepare the Plan components including the drainage design criteria, description of existing site conditions and drainage areas, and existing conditions hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. CONSULTANT will prepare an exhibit depicting the existing site conditions.

CONSULTANT will submit the draft Plan to the CITY for review and comment.

Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 10 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx

11.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PLAN PREPARATION
CONSULTANT will prepare the Plan components including proposed conditions hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, evaluation of proposed drainage improvements, alternatives analysis, description and schematic drawing of the preferred alternative, and associated cost estimates.

CONSULTANT will prepare an exhibit depicting the proposed site conditions. CONSULTANT will submit the draft Plan to the CITY for review and comment. The CITY will submit the Plan to FAA for review and provide and consolidated list of CITY and FAA review comments to the CONSULTANT.

12.0 FINAL PLAN PREPARATION
CONSULTANT will address review comments from the CITY and FAA and finalize the Plan.

CONSULTANT will deliver three (3) hard copies with color exhibits and one (1) electronic copy.

Phase 4 Deliverables
1) Existing Conditions Draft Plan for RSA Project Phase – One (1) electronic copy 2) Proposed Conditions Draft Plan for RSA Project Phase – One (1) electronic copy 3) Existing Conditions Draft Plan for Remaining ACIP/Private Development Projects Phase – One (1) electronic copy
4) Proposed Conditions Draft Plan for Remaining ACIP/Private Development Projects Phase – One (1) electronic copy
5) Final Plan – Three (3) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy

EXTRA SERVICES
The following extra services are not included in this Scope of Services and if required / requested shall be paid for by the CITY in accordance with Attachment 2, Mead & Hunt, Inc. Standard Billing Rate Schedule. 1) Revisions and change orders requested by the CITY and not otherwise included as part of this Scope of Services.
2) Significant revision or addition to the work to be performed by the CONSULTANT that results from changes in laws or codes governing the work after execution of the Contract, provided such revisions or increased work could not have been avoided by timely action on the part of the CONSULTANT.
3) Overtime work by CONSULTANT’s employees when the CITY accelerates or compresses the schedule of work after the date of the Agreement.
4) Other services not included in this Scope of Services. 5) Coordination for Airport Layout Plan updates as a result of Plan. 6) FEMA updates or coordination.
7) Stakeholder/Public Outreach Coordination.
8) Geotechnical Investigation (beyond infiltration testing described in the scope). 9) Detailed and final design will be prepared under a separate contract. 10) Environmental services (will be performed by Centurion under a separate contract with the CITY).

CITY SERVICES
The CITY shall:
1) Provide full information as to the requirements of the Plan.

Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements Exhibit A Scope of Services Revision 1
December 29, 2021

Page 11 of 11 ends

X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Final.docx 2) Furnish legal services required by the CITY in connection with the Plan. 3) Review documents submitted by the CONSULTANT and promptly render decisions pertaining thereto.
4) Provide documentation of known/existing environmental information and jurisdictional waters. 5) Provide available record drawings.
6) Provide private development information as detailed in the Project Description.

SCHEDULE OF COMPLETION
The CONSULTANT will complete all work called for under Phases 1 – 4 within three hundred sixty (360) calendar days from the date the CITY issues the Notice to Proceed with the work. The schedule assumes a NTP in January of 2022. The RSA Project Phase work will be completed by September 2022 to meet other project timelines. The Remaining ACIP Projects Phase and Final Plan will be completed by February 2023.

CONSULTANT’s KEY PERSONNEL
Mead & Hunt’s Key Personnel:
• Project Coordinator, Jeff Leonard, PE
• Project Manager, Kari Nichols, PE
• Project Engineer, Bob Thayne, P.E.
• Modeling Engineer, Quinn Horvath
Subconsultants under Mead & Hunt:
• CGI Technical Services, Inc. (Geotechnical services)
• Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. (Survey services)

COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
1) Payment for work outlined in this Scope of Services shall be a fixed fee of Five Hundred Thirtyfive Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-seven Dollars ($535,337). This fee shall include labor, materials, expenses, and incidentals necessary to complete the work as described herein. An Engineering Services Cost Estimate is included as Attachment 1 to this Scope of Services.

Payments will be made monthly based on the percentage of work complete. 2) Payment for any additional services requested by the CITY will be performed on a time-andexpense basis in conformance with the Mead & Hunt, Inc. Standard Billing Rate Schedule (2022) included as Attachment 2 to this Scope of Services. The CONSULTANT will establish the budget for additional services prior to the start of work and may not exceed the budget without written authorization from the CITY. Any additional services must be authorized in writing by the CITY.

END OF SCOPE OF SERVICES
Attachments:
1 – Engineering Services Cost Estimate
2 – Mead & Hunt, Inc. Standard Billing Rate Schedule (2022) Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Attachment 1
Redding Municipal Airport Senior Associate / Project Coordinator Sr Proj Engineer / Project Manager Project Engineer Engineer III Engineer II Technician II Administrative Assistant Clerical Auto Rental (Per Day) Lodging (per Day) Meals (Per Meal) Reproduction / Shipping Subconsultant (Cost + 15%)
$337.00 $261.00 $221.00 $163.00 $151.00 $124.00 $115.00 $90.00 $150.00 $175.00 $20.00 1 1

1.0 Contract and Subcontracts Preparation 4 8 6 85 4,061.00 $

2.0 Project Coordination and Administration

2.1 Project Coordination 20 40 20 20 2 3 12 25,925.00 $

2.2 ACIP and Grant Administration 12 2 2 5,008.00 $

2.3 General Administration 4 60 16 18,448.00 $
SUBTOTAL PHASE 1 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND COORDINATION 40 110 22 20 0 0 0 22 2 3 12 85 - $ 53,442.00 $

3.0 Basis of Design Development 2 4 12 4 2 4,196.00 $

4.0 Baseline Data Development

4.1 Existing Data Collection and Review 1 10 16 16 24 10,547.00 $

4.2 Site Reconnaissance 8 8 3 6 18 4,932.00 $

4.3 Topographical Surveying 1 2 4 16 16 49,432.75 $ 55,767.75 $

4.4 Topographic Surveying Escort 1 4 132 12 12 36 25,773.00 $

4.5 Survey Data Processing 12 24 4,932.00 $

5.0 Geotechnical Information Review 1 1 2 12 2 2 6 22,068.50 $ 25,834.50 $

6.0 Environmental Conditions Assessment Coordination

6.1 Environmental Conditions Assessment Coordination 4 4 6 6 2 4,926.00 $

7.0 Existing Conditions Hydrology and Hydraulic Modeling

7.1 Subbasin Delineations 2 2 628.00 $

7.2 Model Parameters 8 8 2,512.00 $

7.3 Model Development 4 32 40 12,140.00 $

7.4 Model Evaluations and Output 2 4 4 16 24 8,834.00 $

7.1 Subbasin Delineations 4 4 1,256.00 $

7.2 Model Parameters 12 12 3,768.00 $

7.3 Model Development 8 40 60 17,348.00 $

7.4 Model Evaluations and Output 2 4 8 24 36 12,834.00 $ SUBTOTAL PHASE 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS 12 17 62 220 338 64 4 0 17 20 60 0 71,501 $ 196,228.25 $ Date:

Total Cost
12/23/2021
SECTIONS and TASKS
Labor Classifications and Rates
Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements
Expenses
PHASE 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENTS
PHASE 1 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND COORDINATION

RSA PROJECT PHASE

ACIP PROJECTS PHASE
X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study_FEE EST 1 of 3 12/29/2021 Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Attachment 1
Redding Municipal Airport Senior Associate / Project Coordinator Sr Proj Engineer / Project Manager Project Engineer Engineer III Engineer II Technician II Administrative Assistant Clerical Auto Rental (Per Day) Lodging (per Day) Meals (Per Meal) Reproduction / Shipping Subconsultant (Cost + 15%)
$337.00 $261.00 $221.00 $163.00 $151.00 $124.00 $115.00 $90.00 $150.00 $175.00 $20.00 1 1 Date:

Total Cost
12/23/2021
SECTIONS and TASKS
Labor Classifications and Rates
Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements
Expenses
PHASE 1 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND COORDINATION

8.0 Proposed Conditions Hydrology and Hydraulic Modeling

8.1 Proposed Conditions Basemap 2 2 4 16 4 16 7,276.00 $

8.2 Subbasin Delineations 4 4 1,256.00 $

8.3 Model Parameters 4 2 954.00 $

8.4 Model Development 4 24 32 9,628.00 $

8.5 Model Evaluations and Output 2 2 2 4 8 3,498.00 $

8.1 Proposed Conditions Basemap 2 2 8 40 16 24 14,876.00 $

8.2 Subbasin Delineations 8 12 3,116.00 $

8.3 Model Parameters 8 16 3,720.00 $

8.4 Model Development 8 40 80 20,368.00 $

8.5 Model Evaluations and Output 2 2 8 24 24 10,500.00 $

9.0 Alternatives Analysis and Conceptual Designs Development

9.1.1 Conduct alternatives analysis 12 12 24 8,232.00 $

9.2.1 Develop exhibit and matrix 2 4 8 16 12 6,614.00 $

9.3.1 Present alternatives to City 2 2 2 2 1,964.00 $

9.4.1 Finalize preferred alternative 2 4 16 24 7,638.00 $

9.5.1 Develop final narrative, schematic and cost estimate Inc. Geotech and environmental review 2 2 4 16 40 16 12,712.00 $

9.1.2 Conduct alternatives analysis 24 40 40 17,864.00 $

9.2.2 Develop exhibit and matrix 2 16 24 24 40 16,554.00 $

9.3.2 Present alternatives to City 2 2 2 2 1,964.00 $

9.4.2 Finalize preferred alternative 2 4 24 24 8,942.00 $

9.5.2 Develop final narrative, schematic and cost estimate Inc. Geotech and environmental review 2 2 4 16 40 16 12,712.00 $ SUBTOTAL PHASE 3 - PROPOSED CONDITION ASSESSMENTS 16 24 110 332 430 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 - $ 170,388.00 $ PHASE 3 - PROPOSED CONDITION ASSESSMENTS

RSA PROJECT PHASE

ACIP PROJECTS PHASE

RSA PROJECT PHASE

ACIP/PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PHASE
X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study_FEE EST 2 of 3 12/29/2021 Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Attachment 1
Redding Municipal Airport Senior Associate / Project Coordinator Sr Proj Engineer / Project Manager Project Engineer Engineer III Engineer II Technician II Administrative Assistant Clerical Auto Rental (Per Day) Lodging (per Day) Meals (Per Meal) Reproduction / Shipping Subconsultant (Cost + 15%)
$337.00 $261.00 $221.00 $163.00 $151.00 $124.00 $115.00 $90.00 $150.00 $175.00 $20.00 1 1 Date:

Total Cost
12/23/2021
SECTIONS and TASKS
Labor Classifications and Rates
Airport Drainage Master Plan Improvements
Expenses
PHASE 1 - PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND COORDINATION

10.0.1 Existing Conditions Plan Preparation 2 24 32 32 16 8 18,778.00 $

11.0.1 Proposed Conditions Plan Preparation 2 24 40 40 24 8 22,282.00 $

10.0.2 Existing Conditions Plan Preparation 2 32 40 40 40 8 26,034.00 $

11.0.2 Proposed Conditions Plan Preparation 2 32 60 72 40 8 34,126.00 $

12.0 Final Plan Preparation 4 4 8 16 24 16 12 302.75 14,058.75 $ SUBTOTAL PHASE 4 - AIRPORT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 4 12 120 188 208 136 44 0 0 0 0 303 - $ 115,278.75 $ $ 535,337.00

RSA PROJECT PHASE

ACIP PROJECTS PHASE

TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
PHASE 4 - AIRPORT PLAN
X:\1817600\220117.01\CFEE\Proposal\Working Files\RDD Airport Drainage Study_FEE EST 3 of 3 12/29/2021 Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA MEAD & HUNT, Inc.

Attachment 2
Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: RDD Airport Drainage Study Scope Final Rev 1_Complete (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - 10070 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 31 / Thursday, February 18, 2021 / Notices CFR section/subject 1 Respondent
universe
Total annual
responses
Average time per
response
Total annual
burden hours
Total annual
dollar cost
equivalent 2
—Highway user statement—RR cover
letter and Form FRA F 6180.150 sent
out to potentially injured travelers involved in a highway-rail grade crossing accident/incident. 765 railroads .......... 836 letters/forms ...... 50 minutes .............. 696.67 53,971.02 —Form FRA F 6180.150 completed by
highway user and sent back to railroad.
1,035 injured individuals.585 forms ................. 45 minutes .............. 438.75 33,989.96 225.25(h)—Posting of monthly summary 765 railroads .......... 9,180 lists ................. 5 minutes ................ 765.00 59,264.55 225.27(a)(1)—Retention of records ......... 765 railroads .......... 4,000 records ........... 2 minutes ................ 133.33 10,329.08 —Record of Form FRA F 6180.107s ...... 765 railroads .......... 100 records .............. 2 minutes ................ 3.33 257.98 —Record of monthly lists ........................ 765 railroads .......... 9,180 records ........... 2 minutes ................ 306.00 23,705.82 (a)(2)—Record of Form FRA F 6180.97 765 railroads .......... 10,518 records ......... 2 minutes ................ 350.60 27,160.98 —Record of employee human factor attachments.765 railroads .......... 1,632 records ........... 2 minutes ................ 54.40 4,214.37 225.33—Internal control plans—Amendments.765 railroads .......... 10 amendments ....... 6 hours ................... 60.00 4,648.20 225.35—Access to records and reports .. 765 railroads .......... 200 lists .................... 20 minutes .............. 66.67 5,164.92 225.37(a)—Optical media transfer of reports, updates, and amendments.1 railroad ................ 12 transfers .............. 3 minutes ................ 0.60 46.48 (c)(2)—Electronic submission of reports,
updates, and amendments.
765 railroads .......... 4,590 submissions ... 3 minutes ................ 229.50 17,779.37 Totals ................................................ 765 railroads .......... 89,057 responses .... N/A ......................... 35,845 2,775,067 1The current inventory exhibits a total burden of 46,577 hours while the total burden of this notice is 35,844 hours. Totals may not add due to rounding. 2The dollar equivalent cost is derived from the Surface Transportation Board’s 2019 Full Year Wage A&B data series using the appropriate employee group hourly wage rate that includes a 75-percent overhead charge.

Total Estimated Annual Responses:
89,057.

Total Estimated Annual Burden:
35,845 hours.

Total Estimated Annual Burden Hour
Dollar Cost Equivalent: $2,775,067.

Under 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR
1320.5(b) and 1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA
informs all interested parties that a
respondent is not required to respond
to, conduct, or sponsor a collection of
information that does not display a
currently valid OMB control number.

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.

Brett A. Jortland,
Acting Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2021–03207 Filed 2–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No: FAA–2021–0111]
Deadline for Notification of Intent To
Use the Airport Improvement Program
(AIP) Primary, Cargo, and Nonprimary
Entitlement Funds Available to Date for
Fiscal Year 2021
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration, Department of
Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This action announces March
15, 2021, as the deadline for each
airport sponsor to notify the FAA if it
will use its Fiscal Year (FY) 2021
entitlement funds (referred to as
apportionments in 49 U.S.C. 47114) to
accomplish Airport Improvement
Program (AIP) eligible projects. Each
sponsor has previously identified to the
FAA such projects through the Airports
Capital Improvement Plan process. This
action further announces May 3, 2021,
as the deadline for an airport sponsor to
submit a final grant application to use
FY 2021 entitlement funds.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David F. Cushing, Manager, Airports
Financial Assistance Division, APP–
500, at (202) 267–8827.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 49
U.S.C. 47105(f) provides that the
sponsor of an airport for which
entitlement funds are apportioned shall
notify the Secretary, by such time and
in a form as prescribed by the Secretary,
of the airport sponsor’s intent to submit
a grant application for its available
entitlement funds. Therefore, the FAA is
hereby notifying such airport sponsors
of the steps required to ensure that the
FAA has sufficient time to carry over
and convert remaining entitlement
funds.

The AIP grant program is operating
under the requirements of Public Law
115–254, the ‘‘FAA Reauthorization Act
of 2018,’’ enacted on October 5, 2018,
which authorizes the AIP through
September 30, 2023, and Public Law
116–260, the ‘‘Transportation, Housing
and Urban Development, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2021,’’
which appropriates FY 2021 funds for
the AIP through September 30, 2021. In
accordance with legislation enacted as
of the date of this notice, the AIP has
approximately $2.3 billion of
entitlement funds available through
September 30, 2021.

This notice applies only to those
airports that have entitlement funds
apportioned to them, except those
nonprimary airports located in
designated Block Grant States.

An airport sponsor intending to apply
for any of its available entitlement
funds, including those unused but still
available in accordance with 49 U.S.C.
47117 from prior years, must notify the
FAA of its intent to submit a grant
application by 12 p.m. prevailing local
time on Monday, March 15, 2021.

This notice must be in writing and
address all entitlement funds available
to date for FY 2021, including those
entitlement funds not obligated from
prior years. These notifications are
critical to ensure efficient planning and
administration of the AIP. The final
grant application deadline is Monday,
May 3, 2021. The final grant application
funding requests should be based on
bids, not estimates. The FAA will
carryover the remainder of available
entitlement funds after the above date as
prescribed under 49 U.S.C. 47117.

These funds will not be available again
to the airport sponsor until the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Feb 17, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM 18FEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: Federal Register (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport and Benton Airpark) Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 31 / Thursday, February 18, 2021 / Notices 10071 beginning of FY 2022. Dates are subject
to possible adjustment based on future
legislation. As of the publication of this
notice, appropriations for the FAA
expire on September 30, 2021, and
authorization legislation for the FAA
expires on September 30, 2023.

The FAA has determined this process
and deadline will expedite and facilitate
the FY 2021 grant-making process.

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 11,
2021.

Robert John Craven,
Director, Office of Airport Planning and
Programming.
[FR Doc. 2021–03202 Filed 2–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2021–SCC–0024]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
Early Childhood Longitudinal Study,
Kindergarten Class of 2022–23 (ECLS–
K:2023) Study Delay
AGENCY: National Center for Education
Statistics (NCES), Department of
Education (ED).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing a change to a currently
approved information collection.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before March
22, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for proposed
information collection requests should
be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection request by
selecting ‘‘Department of Education’’
under ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ then
check ‘‘Only Show ICR for Public
Comment’’ checkbox.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Carrie Clarady,
202–245–6347 or email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.

Title of Collection: Early Childhood
Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class
of 2022–23 (ECLS–K:2023) Study Delay.

OMB Control Number: 1850–0750.

Type of Review: No material or
nonsubstantive change to a currently
approved information collection.

Respondents/Affected Public:

Individuals or households.

Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 46,033.

Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 8,655.

Abstract: The Early Childhood
Longitudinal Study (ECLS) program,
conducted by the National Center for
Education Statistics (NCES) within the
Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of
the U.S. Department of Education (ED),
draws together information from
multiple sources to provide rich,
descriptive data on child development,
early learning, and school progress. The
ECLS program studies deliver national
data on children’s status at birth and at
various points thereafter; children’s
transitions to nonparental care, early
care and education programs, and
school; and children’s experiences and
growth through the elementary grades.

The Early Childhood Longitudinal
Study, Kindergarten Class of 2022–23
(ECLS–K:2023) is the fourth cohort in
the series of early childhood
longitudinal studies. The study will
advance research in child development
and early learning by providing a
detailed and comprehensive source of
current information on children’s early
learning and development, transitions
into kindergarten and beyond, and
progress through school. Collecting
parent data beginning in preschool will
enable the study to measure influences
on children’s development before entry
into formal schooling, including
children’s home environments and
access to early care and education. The
request to conduct a field test of the
ECLS–K:2023 preschool data collection
activities from January through October
2020, to field test the preschool data
collection materials and procedures,
was approved in November 2019
(OMB#1850–0750 v.19), with change
requests approved in January and July
2020 (OMB #1850–0750 v.20–21). This
request is to notify OMB and the public
that, due to concerns that as a result of
the ongoing coronavirus pandemic the
ECLS field test and national study
recruitment activities that had been
planned for 2021 may not be successful,
NCES has decided to postpone the study
by one year, and the study will now be
the Early Childhood Longitudinal
Study, Kindergarten Class of 2023–24
(ECLS–K:2024). The kindergarten-first
grade field test will be moved from fall
2021 to fall 2022. The national study
data collections will also be delayed a
year, beginning in 2023. The third-fifth
grade field test will be moved from fall
2025 to fall 2026. No other planned
procedures or features of the study will
change. Approval for the fall 2022
kindergarten-first grade field test and
national study recruitment will be
requested in a separate submission later
in 2021.

Dated: February 12, 2021.

Stephanie Valentine,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2021–03302 Filed 2–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0014; FRL–10020–35]
Triadimefon; Rescissions of
Previously Issued Cancellation Orders
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA’s
rescission of two previously issued
cancellation orders for seven
triadimefon product registrations that
have not yet become effective.

Specifically, this notice rescinds
cancellation orders announced in two
previously issued Federal Register
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Feb 17, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM 18FEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: Federal Register (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport and Benton Airpark)

BENTON AIRPARK
DRAFT FAA/CALTRANS ACIP (FY 2022-2027)
PREPARED: FEBRURY 08, 2022

FAA CITY OF REDDING PROJECT TOTAL FEDERAL STATE CITY
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR NUMBER PROJECT QUANTITY COST SHARE * SHARE SHARE 2021 2021-22 21-1 Airport Layout Plan Update with Narrative and AGIS Aeronautical Survey LS $266,383 $266,383 $0 $0 2021 2021-22 21-2 Runway Pavement Preservation / MAGVAR - Slurry Seal (Design Only) LS $71,691 $71,691 $0 $0 2021 2021-22 21-3 Comprehensive Drainage Study LS $215,000 $215,000 $0 $0 Subtotal (FAA FY 2021) $553,074 $553,074 $0 $0
2022 2022-23 22-1 Runway Pavement Preservation / MAGVAR - Slurry Seal (Construct) 24,000 SY $490,000 $441,000 $22,050 $26,950 2022 2022-23 22-2 Reconstruct Eastside T-Hangar Taxilanes and Drainage Improvements (Design Only)** LS $325,000 $292,500 $14,625 $17,875 Subtotal (FAA FY 2022) $815,000 $733,500 $36,675 $44,825 2023 2023-24 23-1 Reconstruct Eastside T-Hangar Taxilanes and Drainage Improvements (Construct) 23,250 SY $3,300,000 $2,970,000 $148,500 $181,500 2023 2023-24 23-2 Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction (Design Only) LS $310,000 $279,000 $13,950 $17,050 2023 2023-24 23-3 Rehabilitate Parallel Taxiway "A" (Design Only) LS $55,200 $49,680 $2,484 $3,036 2023 2023-24 23-4 Underground Powerline in the RPZ (Design Only) LS $45,000 $40,500 $2,025 $2,475 Subtotal (FAA FY 2023) $3,710,200 $3,339,180 $166,959 $204,061 2024 2024-25 24-1 Rehabilitate Parallel Taxiway "A" (Construct) 10,500 SY $325,000 $292,500 $14,625 $17,875 2024 2024-25 24-2 Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction (Construct) 14,000 SY $2,440,000 $2,196,000 $109,800 $134,200 2024 2024-25 24-3 Underground Powerline in the RPZ LS $100,000 $90,000 $4,500 $5,500 2024 2024-25 24-4 Westside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction (Design Only) LS $360,000 $324,000 $16,200 $19,800 Subtotal (FAA FY 2024) $3,225,000 $2,902,500 $145,125 $177,375 2025 2025-26 25-1 Westside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction (Construct) 16,000 SY $3,810,000 $3,429,000 $171,450 $209,550 2025 2025-26 25-2 Security Fencing - North RPZ (Design Only) LS $45,000 $40,500 $2,025 $2,475 Subtotal (FAA FY 2025) $3,855,000 $3,469,500 $173,475 $212,025 2026 2026-27 26-1 Security Fencing - North RPZ (Construct) 4,600 LF $90,000 $81,000 $4,050 $4,950 2026 2026-27 26-2 East Apron Pavement Rehabilitation (Design Only) LS $95,000 $85,500 $4,275 $5,225 2026 2026-27 26-3 Construct New T-Hangar Taxilane (Design Only) LS $85,000 $76,500 $3,825 $4,675 2026 2026-27 26-4 Runway 15 Approach Tree Clearing LS $100,000 $90,000 $4,500 $5,500 Subtotal (FAA FY 2026) $370,000 $333,000 $16,650 $20,350 2027 2027-28 27-1 East Apron Pavement Rehabilitation (Construct) 15,000 SY $950,000 $855,000 $42,750 $52,250 2027 2027-28 27-2 Construct New T-Hangar Taxilane (Construct) 4,500 SY $665,000 $598,500 $29,925 $36,575 Subtotal (FAA FY 2027) $1,615,000 $1,453,500 $72,675 $88,825 TOTAL ACIP (FY2022 - FY2027) $13,590,200 $12,231,180 $611,559 $747,461 * FEDERAL SHARE = 90% (except in FY 2021 - FAA funding at 100% Federal Share per American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 ) Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: Benton ACIP FY2022 - FY2027 Feb. 2022 (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal

REDDING MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
FINAL ACIP (FY 2022-2027)
PREPARED: FEBRUARY 08, 2022

FAA CITY OF REDDING PROJECT TOTAL FEDERAL STATE CITY
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR NUMBER PROJECT QUANTITY COST SHARE (1) SHARE SHARE 2021 2021-22 21-1 Preliminary Design Concept Study for Runways 16-34, Runway 12-30, and Taxiway Connectors LS $458,000 $458,000 $0 $0 2021 2021-22 21-2 Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road (Woodrum Circle) - Phase I 4,400 SY $1,356,000 $1,356,000 $0 $0 Subtotal (FAA FY 2021) $1,814,000 $1,814,000 $0 $0
2022 2022-23 22-1 ARFF Foam Kit Reimbursement LS $36,731 $33,300 $0 $3,431 2022 2022-23 22-2
Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road (Woodrum Circle, Knighton Road, Flight Avenue, and Municipal Boulevard) - Phase 2 (Construct) (2) 12,500 SY $2,922,222 $2,649,286 $0 $272,936 2022 2022-23 22-3
Runway 16-34 and Taxiway Connectors Rehabilitation (4-Inch Mill & Overlay with Grade Correction), Blast Pad Reconstruction, and MAGVAR for Runways 16-34 and 12-30 (Design) (3) LS $1,342,000 $1,216,657 $0 $125,343 2022 2022-23 22-4
Master Plan Update (Aeronautical AGIS Survey, Terminal Expansion Study, Energy Audit Assessment, Environmental Surveys, and Land Use Analysis Study) LS $1,161,907 $1,053,385 $0 $108,522 Subtotal (FAA FY 2022) $5,462,860 $4,952,629 $0 $510,231 2023 2023-24 23-1
Master Drainage Study - Comprehensive Airport Property Analysis to include Environmental Surveys (Reimbursement) LS $556,751 $504,750 $0 $52,001
2023 2023-24 23-2 Wildlife Hazard Assessment & Wildlife Hazard Management Plan LS $150,000 $135,990 $0 $14,010 2023 2023-24 23-3
Runway 16-34 RSA Grading, Shoulder, and Drainage Improvements, Runway 34 REIL Modifications, and Electrical Improvements (Design) LS $875,000 $793,275 $0 $81,725 2023 2023-24 23-4 Terminal Expansion (Design)(4) - based on Master Plan analysis LS $750,000 $679,950 $0 $70,050 2023 2023-24 23-5 Extension of Northwest Aprons for Overflow Transient Operations (Design) LS $150,000 $135,990 $0 $14,010 2023 2023-24 23-6 Video Cameras for Remote Vehicle Gates 39, 42, & 20 3 EA $150,000 $135,990 $0 $14,010 2023 2023-24 23-7 Rehabilitate/Upgrade Airport Access Control System (Design) LS $75,000 $67,995 $0 $7,005 2023 2023-24 23-8 Installation of Fingerprint Live Scan Equipment LS $50,000 $45,330 $0 $4,670 2023 2023-24 23-9 All Weather Perimeter Road - RSAP Recommendations (Design) LS $100,000 $90,660 $0 $9,340 Subtotal (FAA FY 2023) $2,856,751 $2,589,930 $0 $266,821 2024 2024-25 24-1
Runway 16-34 and Taxiway Connectors Rehabilitation (4-Inch Mill & Overlay with Grade Correction), Blast Pad Reconstruction, Remarking & Signage for MAGVAR (Construct) (3) - Include Reimbursement for Environmental Documentation associated with Project 30,000 SY $18,322,000 $16,610,725 $0 $1,711,275 2024 2024-25 24-2 Terminal Expansion (Construct) (4) - based on Master Plan analysis LS $10,000,000 $9,066,000 $0 $934,000 2024 2024-25 24-3 Extension of Northwest Aprons for Overflow Transient Operations (Construct) 77,200 SY $2,000,000 $1,813,200 $0 $186,800 2024 2024-25 24-4 Environmental Assessment - Parallel Runway - based on Master Plan analysis LS $500,000 $453,300 $0 $46,700 2024 2024-25 24-5 Rehabilitate/Upgrade Airport Access Control System (Construct) LS $625,000 $566,625 $0 $58,375 2024 2024-25 24-6 High-Speed Runway Sweeper LS $350,000 $317,310 $0 $32,690 2024 2024-25 24-7 Pavement Preservation - Apron & Taxiways (Design) LS $120,000 $108,792 $0 $11,208 2024 2024-25 24-8 All Weather Perimeter Road - RSAP Recommendations (Construct) 29,400 SY $1,000,000 $906,600 $0 $93,400 Subtotal (FAA FY 2024) $32,917,000 $29,842,552 $0 $3,074,448 2025 2025-26 25-1
Runway 16-34 RSA Grading, Shoulder, and Drainage Improvements, Runway 34 REIL Modifications, and Electrical Improvements (Construct) - Include Reimbursement for Environmental Documentation associated with Project 30,000 SY $13,650,000 $12,375,090 $0 $1,274,910 2025 2025-26 25-2
Runway 17-35 Extension 1,015 feet including Parallel Taxiway and Connectors (Design) (5) - based on Master Plan analysis 16,700 SY $350,000 $317,310 $0 $32,690 2025 2025-26 25-3 Pavement Preservation - Apron & Taxiways (Construct) 170,000 SY $1,000,000 $906,600 $0 $93,400 Subtotal (FAA FY 2025) $86,547,502 $78,463,965 $0 $8,083,537 2026 2026-27 26-1 Parallel Runway/Taxiway includes New Electrical Vault (Design) LS $500,000 $453,300 $0 $46,700 2026 2026-27 26-2 Expand Solar Farm 1.5 Acres Study LS $100,000 $90,660 $0 $9,340 2026 2026-27 26-3 Security Fencing (Design) LS $55,000 $49,863 $0 $5,137 Subtotal (FAA FY 2026) $655,000 $593,823 $0 $61,177
Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: RDD ACIP FY2022 - FY 2027 Feb. 2022 (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport

REDDING MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
FINAL ACIP (FY 2022-2027)
PREPARED: FEBRUARY 08, 2022

FAA CITY OF REDDING PROJECT TOTAL FEDERAL STATE CITY
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR NUMBER PROJECT QUANTITY COST SHARE (1) SHARE SHARE 2027 2027-28 27-1 Parallel Runway/Taxiway includes New Electrical Vault (Construct) 52,400 SY $11,100,000 $10,063,260 $0 $1,036,740 2027 2027-28 27-2 Expand Solar Farm 1.5 Acres (Design) LS $100,000 $90,660 $0 $9,340 2027 2027-28 27-3 Security Fencing (Construct) LS $55,000 $49,863 $0 $5,137 Subtotal (FAA FY 2027) $11,255,000 $10,203,783 $0 $1,051,217 TOTAL ACIP (FY 2022-2027) $139,694,113 $126,646,683 $0 $13,047,430 (1) FEDERAL SHARE = 90.66% (except in FY 2021 - FAA funding at 100% per American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 ).

Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: RDD ACIP FY2022 - FY 2027 Feb. 2022 (available online) (4.11(j)--FAA Grant Funding for Projects FY22 - Redding Municipal Airport

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution formally certifying the unit modification of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 1245 AFL-CIO Electric Employees Unit (IBEW Electric Unit) acknowledging IBEW Electric Unit as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization for the classification of Electrical Technician in accordance with the City of Redding’s EmployerEmployee Relations Resolution (EER) and the Myers-Millias-Brown Act, effective February 15, 2022.

Fiscal Impact
There is no immediate fiscal impact for formally certifying IBEW Electric Unit as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization for these classifications.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could decline to approve the resolution, indicating that the Council is not satisfied with the validity of the unit modification process.

Background/Analysis
On October 28, 2021, the City of Redding (City) received a revised proposed unit modification petition from IBEW Electric Unit seeking to represent the Electrical Technician classification most recently assigned to the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 1245 AFL-CIO Maintenance Employees Unit (IBEW Maintenance Unit). The City determined:
• The petition was in compliance with the requirements of Article II, Section 7, of the EER; and
• The proposed unit modification petition conforms to the requirements of Article II sections 1 and 4, of the EER.

MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.15(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(a)--Consider Resolution certifying unit modification of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 1245 (IBEW Electric Unit).

Sheri DeMaagd, Assistant
City Manager
Packet Pg. 960
Report to Redding City Council February 8, 2022
Re: 4.15(a)--Modification of the IBEW Electric Employees Local 1245 Unit Page 2 Pursuant to the EER, IBEW Electric Unit certified that the seven employees holding regular fulltime positions within the covered classification voted in favor of the unit modification and subsequent recognition. An additional Electrical Technician was hired after the petition was submitted. The City has verified with the current eight affected employees this is their intent.

Additionally, IBEW Maintenance Unit has provided notification of support of the unit modification.

Once an employee organization is formally certified as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization by the City Council, the affected employees will be relinquishing any right to the terms and conditions of employment and benefits as set forth in the IBEW Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and will be covered under and by the terms of the IBEW Electric Unit MOU ratified as of February 22, 2019.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Resolution
Packet Pg. 961
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-_____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

CERTIFYING THE UNIT MODIFICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL
BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION 1245
AFL-CIO ELECTRIC EMPLOYEES UNIT, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 15, 2022 WHEREAS, the City received a petition for unit modification of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers – Local 1245 Electric Employees Unit acknowledging IBEW Electric Unit as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization for the classification of Electrical Technician in accordance with the City of Redding’s Employer-Employee Relations Resolution and the Myers-Millias-Brown Act, effective February 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the petition was in compliance with the requirements of Article II, Section 7, of the Employer-Employee Relations Resolution and the proposed unit modification petition conforms to the requirements of Article II, Sections 1 and 4, of the Employer-Employee Relations Resolution; and WHEREAS, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers – Local 1245 Electric Employees Unit certified that the eight employees holding regular full-time positions within the covered classification voted in favor of the unit modification and subsequent recognition; and WHEREAS, staff has recommended that the City Council formally certify and recognize the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers – Local 1245 Electric Employees Unit as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization for the classification of Electrical Technician in accordance with the City of Redding’s Employer-Employee Relations Resolution and the Myers-Millias-Brown Act, effective February 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City to adopt such recommendation;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council that the Council certifies and recognizes the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers – Local 1245 Electric Employees Unit as the Exclusively Recognized Employee Organization for the classification of Electrical Technician in accordance with the City of Redding’s Employer-Employee Relations Resolution and the Myers-Millias-Brown Act, effective February 15, 2022.

Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: Resolution (4.15(a)--Modification of the IBEW Electric Employees Local 1245 Unit) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ ____________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: Resolution (4.15(a)--Modification of the IBEW Electric Employees Local 1245 Unit)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution confirming the agreement between the City of Redding and the Classic Unrepresented Non-Safety Employees and Elected Officials Group for additional cost sharing of employer contributions to the California Public Employees Retirement System.

Fiscal Impact
There is no immediate fiscal impact by adopting the resolution for the additional cost sharing.

The resolution reflects the City Council’s previous action.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not adopt the resolution confirming the cost sharing agreement for the Classic California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) Unrepresented NonSafety Employees and Elected Officials and the member contribution would not change.

Alternatively, the City Council could provide additional direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
At the January 18, 2022, City Council meeting, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-006 approving changes to the Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees whereby the Unrepresented Non-Safety Employees and Elected Officials identified as Classic CalPERS members agree to additional cost sharing of the retirement benefit contribution rate in accordance with Government Code Section 20516 as follows:

MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.15(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(b)--Adopt Resolution confirming the agreement between the City of Redding and the Classic Unrepresented Non-Safety Employees and Elected Officials Group for additional cost sharing of employer contributions to the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS).

Sheri DeMaagd, Assistant
City Manager
Packet Pg. 964
Report to Redding City Council February 7, 2022
Re: 4.15(b)--Adopt Resolution confirming Cost Sharing Agreement with Unrepresented Page 2 CalPERS Classic Non-Safety Employees and Elected Officials (Tier 1) Contribution Increase • An additional 1.125 percent (1.125%), effective as soon as administratively feasible [total employee contribution of 9.125%].

The CalPERS process for Section 20516 Cost Share for unrepresented employees requires the exact percentage of cost share be included in a resolution adopted by the City Council, and requires a simple majority of the unrepresented employees impacted to sign an agreement to the resolution.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
Attachments
Resolution
Previous Staff Report - January 18, 2022 - 9.1(e) Consider Resolution approving amendments to Exec Mgmt Employment and Benefit Policies (available online) Packet Pg. 965
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

CONFIRMING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF REDDING

AND THE CLASSIC UNREPRESENTED NON-SAFETY EMPLOYEES

AND ELECTED OFFICIALS GROUP FOR ADDITIONAL COST

SHARING OF EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees which included additional cost sharing for “Classic” non-safety members in Article 15: Retirement Programs on January 18, 2022, with Resolution No. 2022-006; and WHEREAS, the California Public Employee’s Retirement System requires a resolution with specific language identifying the exact percentage of cost sharing for unrepresented employees, and requires a simple majority of the unrepresented employees impacted to sign agreement to the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redding staff recommends confirming the agreement between the City of Redding and the Classic Unrepresented Non-Safety Employees and Elected Officials Group (Tier 1) in accordance with Government Code Section 20516 to increase cost sharing of an additional 1.125 percent effective as soon as administratively feasible; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City to adopt such recommendation;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding that the City of Redding would like to confirm the agreement between the City of Redding and the Classic Unrepresented Public Safety Management Group to increase cost sharing of an additional 1.125 percent for “Classic” Non-Safety Employees and Elected Officials of the Unrepresented Employees group effective as soon as administratively feasible, in accordance with Government Code Section 20516.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

___________________________________
KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ ___________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Resolution (4.15(b)--Adopt Resolution confirming Cost Sharing Agreement with Unrepresented)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution approving the following:
(1) Amendment to the Executive Management Pay-For-Performance Salary Plan (Unrepresented) providing classification-specific salary range adjustments as a result of a compensation study, including the City Manager and City Attorney classifications, and authorizing immediate salary increases for the employees in those classifications, effective January 23, 2022; and
(2) Amendment of the Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees to:
(a) eliminate the educational and professional incentives/specialty assignment pay for the Public Safety Management classifications; and (b) increase the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) cost sharing amount by 1.125 percent for Classic CalPERS Miscellaneous Members, effective January 23, 2022, or as soon as administratively feasible.

Fiscal Impact
The annual cost of approving the salary schedule adjustment is approximately $1.3 million, of which $670,000 will come from the General Fund. There is sufficient budget available for this increase.

The additional contribution by Unrepresented Classic CalPERS Miscellaneous members of an additional 1.125 percent toward their CalPERS retirement pension benefit, for a total contribution of 9.125 percent, will result in an annual savings of approximately $97,000, of which $16,000 applies to the General Fund.

MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.1(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(e)--Consider Resolution approving amendments to Executive Management Pay-For-Performance Salary Plan and Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees.

Barry Tippin, City
Manager/Development
Services Director
Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - January 18, 2022 - 9.1(e) Consider Resolution approving amendments to Exec Mgmt Employment and Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2022
Re: 9.1(e)--Unrepresented Salary Schedule Page 2
Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the resolution amending the Executive Management Pay-For-Performance Salary Plan and Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees, and provide additional direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The City Council has developed goals and objectives for the City Manager to provide focus. One of the Objectives is “Government of the 21st Century” and one of the goals identified for that Objective is to “Develop a plan to improve the City’s effectiveness with a focus on organizational structure and succession planning.” There are, of course many layers to this goal, but the most important element is the City of Redding’s (City) workforce. The City delivers critical services to the community, and the ability to retain its existing staff and hire new quality employees is paramount. In recent years, this has been an increasing challenge. One of the reasons is that across the board the City’s compensation is below the labor market rate. To verify this, the City hired a consultant to study the City’s compensation plan, specifically salary and benefits, for all represented and unrepresented classifications and to also review how positions and classifications relate from a step and/or level perspective, and in succession planning, within the City.

The study compared key benchmark positions to the labor market. The labor market cities used for the unrepresented study included Chico, Davis, Fairfield, Folsom, Lodi, Roseville, Tracy, Turlock, Vacaville, and Woodland. These cities were selected in accordance with City Council Policy 206, which requires staff to survey comparable labor markets to review full compensation packages. These 10 cities have been historically used in prior comparison studies. The Redding Electric Utility completed a parallel study in which additional unrepresented positions with different comparable agencies were studied. The study results show that when comparing salary only, as a group, the unrepresented classifications are approximately 29 percent below the market median. After making an adjustment for the cost of housing to aid in determining a true compensation comparison between markets, the unrepresented classifications are approximately 31 percent below the market median. Individually, the classifications range from six percent to 75 percent behind the market with the majority being 20-30 percent below the market median.

The study data is attached to this staff report.

City Council Policy 206 reads, in part, “The City of Redding will establish and maintain a compensation policy which is intended to recruit and retain the better qualified employees”…..and….”The City shall conduct periodic surveys of public and private sector employment in order to ensure that its compensation practices conform to the practices of a cross-section of public and private employers in the labor market from which the City recruits its workforce.” The results of the compensation study clearly indicate that the City has deviated from the intent of this policy. The Great Recession and the intervening 12 years have been a challenge with an economy that was sluggish to recover combined with major changes in pension assumptions that drastically increase pension costs. In fact, in 2017, there was a projected budget deficit of $30 million dollars over a 10-year span. However, due to an improving economy, sound fiscal decisions, and the willingness of City employees to continue to assist with addressing the rising cost of benefits, the City is now on very strong, sound financial footing. The City has a projected balanced 10-Year Plan for all funds, that maintains a 10 percent cash reserve per Council policy. Consequently, the City can now address Council Policy 206 by reviewing its intent, focusing on employees, and ensuring its employees are fairly compensated for the excellent work they do.

Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - January 18, 2022 - 9.1(e) Consider Resolution approving amendments to Exec Mgmt Employment and Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2022
Re: 9.1(e)--Unrepresented Salary Schedule Page 3
Staff recommendation to adjust the salary ranges of the unrepresented classifications, ranging from five percent to 40 percent, as outlined in the matrix attached to the staff report is the first step in focusing on employee compensation. The recommendations take into account the market study results, as well as position relationships, and succession planning. Further, it is recommended that the unrepresented employees be eligible immediately for the total wage adjustment percentage identified for their assigned classification. The compensation report data indicates that the unrepresented classifications have fallen further out of market over the past 10 years than most of the City’s represented employees. Because no requirements for collective bargaining exist with unrepresented employees, the City Council can act swiftly to address the market issues that have been proven to exist. Classifications represented by labor organizations will be reviewed for salary adjustment recommendations during the negotiation process for successor Memoranda of Understanding. However, the same approach of striving to compensate employees at a fair rate as established by the labor market should be taken.

Providing compensation to employees that is both fair and established by the labor market is a goal that is driven by Council Policy 206 and reinforced by the Objectives established for the City Manager by the City Council, and it recognizes the value employees are to this organization and the essential services that are provided to the community by its quality employees.

Lastly, it is also recommended that the Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees be revised, eliminating educational incentives and professional certification/specialty assignment incentives for the unrepresented Public Safety Management employees (Police Chief, Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chief) and adding language for additional cost sharing of the CalPERS retirement benefit for non-safety employees. The recommended salary increases factor in the amount of educational and professional certification/specialty assignment incentive pay that is being eliminated. The additional cost sharing of the CalPERS retirement benefit in the amount of 1.125 percent for the unrepresented Classic Miscellaneous CalPERS members would be effective as soon as administratively feasible. This amount equates to 50 percent of the Normal Cost of the retirement benefit and is consistent with the amount other employee groups are contributing toward their retirement benefit costs. The revised Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees document is available online.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Resolution
Council Policy 206 - Salary Policy (available online)
Unrep Employment and Benefit Policies 1.23.22 DRAFT (available online) Appendix A - Unrep 1.2022 (available online)
Appendix A - Unrep Electric Class Only 1.2022 (available online) ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-January 23, 2022 (available online)
ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-July 10, 2022 (available online)
ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-July 9, 2023 (available online)
ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-October 31, 2021 (available online)
Bryce Data_REU (available online)
Unrepresented Non-Electric Recommended Increases 1.23.22 Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - January 18, 2022 - 9.1(e) Consider Resolution approving amendments to Exec Mgmt Employment and Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2022 Re: 9.1(e)--Unrepresented Salary Schedule Page 4 Unrepresented Electric Recommended Increases 1.23.22
Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - January 18, 2022 - 9.1(e) Consider Resolution approving amendments to Exec Mgmt Employment and

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Reconvene the public hearing opened at the City Council Meeting of December 7, 2021, and continued on December 21, 2021, and January 18, 2022, and upon conclusion:
(1) Adopt Resolution: (a) adopting the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan; (b) adopting the addendum to the mitigated negative declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map; (c) adopting amendments to Redding’s General Plan (General Plan Amendment Application GPA2021-00449); and (d) amending the City of Redding Schedule of Fees and Service Charges;
(2) Offer Ordinance for first reading by title only and waive the full reading: (a) adopting the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan; (b) adopting the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map; (c) adopting the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update (Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361); (d) approving amendments to Redding Zoning Map (Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450); (e) making findings in support of a general plan consistency determination; and direct the City Attorney to prepare a summary ordinance, and authorize the City Clerk to publish the summary ordinance according to law; and
(3) Find that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan and the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map are adequate to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, and the necessary findings for approval are in evidence.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of the proposed General Plan amendment, rezoning, and specific plan amendment applications would not result in any fiscal impacts to the City of Redding (City). The proposed MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 6.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing to consider General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Specific Plan Amendment Applications; and the Resolution and Ordinance associated with the adoption of the proposed Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update.

Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Packet Pg. 971
Report to Redding City Council February 6, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 2 Development Services pre-application review fee of $400 will be used to offset a portion of the cost of providing a pre-application review.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to not approve the General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449, Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450, or Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361. The adopted Downtown Redding Specific Plan would remain in effect.

The Council could also choose to direct staff to modify the Draft Specific Plan update for future consideration, not approve the Development Services fee for pre-application review, and/or provide alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The public hearing was opened on December 7, 2021, and due to an administrative error, the hearing was continued to the next regular scheduled meeting on December 21 to comply with required noticing regulations. At the December 21, 2021, Council meeting, following staff’s presentation, the public hearing was re-opened, related testimony heard, and the Council then voted to continue the public hearing to January 18, 2022, to allow for additional time to clarify information from staff and take additional comments from residents. At the January 18, 2022, hearing, the Council voted to continue the public hearing to February 15, 2022, in order to include the entire Garden Tract neighborhood in the public notice mailing.

The Downtown Redding Specific Plan was originally adopted in 2001 and amended in 2010 and in 2018. The 2018 update involved numerous stakeholders, community members, the Redding Planning Commission, and the Council. Meetings and workshops were held in order to present information and preliminary proposals and to solicit input and feedback pertinent to the formulation of the update.

The vision of the 2018 update was to create a revitalized downtown space in Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of historical and natural resources, with a lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-accessible shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities, and is inviting to residents and visitors alike. The 2018 update reduced the Specific Plan area boundary, changed the zoning and general plan land use classification of certain properties, and modified the land use regulations, development standards, parking requirements, design standards and guidelines, implementation action plan, and other various provisions of the Specific Plan.

In concert with the 2018 update, Downtown Redding has experienced a tremendous resurgence.

Through public-private partnerships, the downtown space is being revitalized. The reopening of streets to the core allows access to vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists. The physical landscape is changing with the introduction of 200 new residential units, new commercial and retail properties, new parking options, and through the renovation of existing buildings. In short, the vision of the 2018 update is being fulfilled.

Implementation of the Specific Plan was challenging the past three years; requiring staff to apply new regulations, building standards, and guidelines, and to also streamline the development review and entitlement process. Throughout, it has been clear that the regulations would need Packet Pg. 972
Report to Redding City Council February 6, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 3 further refinement to continue the revitalization of Downtown Redding and to further foster greater economic development and opportunities in the City’s core.

Staff held two stakeholder meetings earlier this year to gather input from interested stakeholders located in the downtown core to ensure desired elements are included in the development of alternatives and proposed changes. Additionally, staff held a requested neighborhood informational meeting with the Garden Tract Neighborhood on October 19, 2021, to further gather input.

The Draft Specific Plan update would expand the Specific Plan area boundary; change the zoning and general plan land use classification of the expansion area; and modify the land use regulations, development standards, and other various provisions of the Specific Plan.

The Redding Planning Commission (Commission) held a public hearing at its regularly scheduled meeting of October 26, 2021. The main issues discussed at the Commission meeting were the impact of the height of future buildings adjacent to residential properties, the type of discretionary permit required, and the boundary expansion area. Staff recommended a directorlevel approval site development permit be required for: (1) uses that currently require a use permit; or (2) any uses, including those that are currently outright permitted without a discretionary permit, where development of those uses would be better served with a discretionary permit (i.e. mixed-use developments in the Downtown Core District). The Commission determined that the public would be better served by participating in a discretionary process that requires a public hearing for these decisions. The Commission voted unanimously, 4-0, recommending that the Council approve the Draft Specific Plan and do the following: (1) reduce the maximum height on those properties adjacent to a single-family residential district to 35 feet; (2) require Board of Administrative Review level approval for a site development permit rather than a director-level approval site development permit; and (3) exclude the properties east of Sequoia Street from the Specific Plan boundary expansion. Staff supports the Commission’s recommendations to the Council.

Issues
Proposed changes to the Chapter 6, Regulations, Standards, and Guidelines.

Listed below is a summary of the proposed changes:
• All new developments, including additions, will require a pre-application process, subject to a $400 administrative fee, through the Planning Division to assist in identifying any potential matters prior to submitting for building permits. • Require a site development permit rather than a use permit for the following uses:

Land Use Core
District
Mixed-Use
District
Multiple-Family Residential exceeding 4 units X
College and Trade Schools on the ground floor X
Government Offices on the ground floor X
Clinics on the ground floor X
Clubs and Lodges X
Packet Pg. 973
Report to Redding City Council February 6, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 4 Land Use Core
District
Mixed-Use
District
Religious Facilities on the ground floor X
Parking Structures X
Residential Care X X
Convenience Gas Marts X
Banks with Drive-Throughs X
Automobile Rentals X
Automobile Washing X
Laboratories on the ground floor X
Business Services on the ground floor X
Maintenance and Repair Services on the ground floor X
Commercial Recreation X X
Communication Facility within Buildings X X
• Require a site development permit for the following uses:

Land Use Core
District
Mixed-Use
District
Supportive/Transitional Housing X X
Home Improvement Sales and Services greater than 5,000
square feet X
• Allow for the following uses:

Land Use Core
District
Mixed-Use
District
Commercial and Residential Condominiums X X
R & D Research Facility or Office on the 2nd floor and
above and within non-street-frontage ground floor spaces X R & D Research Facility or Office X
Food Trucks (Private Property) as an accessory use subject to a Temporary Use Permit X X
Banks, without Drive-Throughs less than or equal to 2,000 square feet on the ground floor X
Automobile Rental Offices on 2nd floor and above X
Home Improvement Sales and Services less than or equal
to 5,000 square feet, including Plant Nurseries with
screened outdoor yards
X X
Businesses whose primary use consists of tattoo services X X Businesses whose primary use consists of massage services with a use permit X X
The Draft Specific Plan also proposes the following:
• Allow for monument signs in the Mixed-Use District; and Packet Pg. 974
Report to Redding City Council February 6, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 5 • Design standards and a review process for fencing in the front of buildings at zero setback and prohibit chain link fences.

Proposed expansion of the Specific Plan Boundary.

The area proposed to be included in the Specific Plan is generally bounded by Shasta Street to the north, Lincoln Street to the south, East Street to the west, and Sequoia Street to the east.

More than half of the proposed area was originally included in the 2010 Specific Plan but was eliminated in the 2018 update. The reasoning for reducing the boundary in the 2018 update was to better define the area considered to be Downtown Redding.

Analysis
Many of the proposed changes are a result of the stakeholder meetings and the neighborhood meeting. Although land use regulations, development standards, entitlement processes, and guidelines affecting properties within the proposed expansion area would be modified as a result of the Specific Plan Update, the proposal would not allow urban development to occur in areas where the same or similar types of urban development are not presently permitted, with the exception of height limits.

At this time, staff is of the opinion that bringing the identified, and previously excluded, public facilities and multiple family areas back into the Specific Plan would bring economic benefit to these properties. The northern portion, north of Placer Street, is currently either zoned “PF” Public Facilities or “GO” General Office and contains the “BH” Midrise Building Height Overlay District, which allows building heights to exceed the limitations of the base zoning districts by use permit up to a maximum height limit of 75 feet. Bringing this area back into the Specific Plan would not change the height limits already afforded under the current “BH” Building Height Overlay District.

The multiple family zoned areas proposed to be included are predominantly developed with multiple family development and have been developed beyond the allowed base density under the existing “RM-10” Multiple Family Zoning District. The inclusion into the Specific Plan would bring these properties into conformance since the Specific Plan allows up to 30 units per acre.

The inclusion of Butte Street would bring economic benefit to the already legal non-conforming development along this area. Most of the structures do not meet setback standards, which leads to limited redevelopment of the area. Further, the “GO” General Office district does not allow for the convenient type uses that would benefit the adjacent Garden Tract neighborhood. Staff recommended to the Commission the inclusion of the Butte Street corridor, including the properties west and east of Sequoia Street, because this would connect the Specific Plan to the adjacent Redding Riverfront Specific Plan Area at the SR44 on/off ramp, thereby creating a convergence of two distinct areas at a major juncture. However, as previously noted, the Commission excluded the properties east of Sequoia Street from the boundary expansion since these are undeveloped properties and are not straddled by any legal non-conforming issue nor do they consider these properties a part of Downtown. Note that there are several diagrams in the Downtown Specific Plan that depict the Specific Plan boundary area. These diagrams will be updated to reflect the Council’s decision.

The current zoning along Butte Street, between Continental and Sequoia Streets, is within the Packet Pg. 975
Report to Redding City Council February 6, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 6 “GO” General Office District. The height limit in the “GO” General Office District is 45 feet.

The maximum height limit in the Mixed-Use District is 75 feet, which exceeds the existing zoning district. Following the input received by the Garden Tract group, regarding their concern on the height of structures and its impact onto a single-family neighborhood, staff recommended to the Commission to limit the maximum height to 35 feet on properties adjacent to a singlefamily zoning district. The Commission approved this recommendation.

In response to concerns regarding the impact of the building height to the Garden Tract neighborhood, staff is further recommending to limit the height to 35 feet to the specific plan area located east of Continental Street. The would include both the north and south sides of Butte Street.

Reducing the restrictions for banks and other active commercial uses on the ground floor in the Core District would allow for a variety of uses that are pedestrian-oriented and accessible. This was one of the options made available during the 2018 update.

One of the goals of the Specific Plan Update is to further streamline the approval process by changing the requirement for the uses that currently require a use permit to instead require a Site Development Permit which still requires a public hearing and public noticing.

There are currently many monument signs in the Specific Plan area, particularly in the MixedUse District. Currently, the plan prohibits monument signs in the Specific Plan area, making all of the existing signs legal non-conforming, thereby limiting the ability for businesses to perform major alterations to the existing signs. Addressing monument signs in the Mixed-Use District would alleviate the legal non-conforming designation, allow these signs to be permitted, and therefore allow major alterations, including relocation, and major design upgrades. Overall, this would enhance the aesthetics of Downtown Redding.

The Specific Plan does not regulate fencing, particularly within the areas in front of the buildings. In order to preserve the aesthetics along the street, staff recommends the incorporation of a standard and process to allow for fencing in the front of a building and to prohibit chain link fencing.

Additional staff review of projects is needed to ensure development standards are met. The introduction of a pre-application review is a critical step in ensuring the Specific Plan is adhered to. Staff conducted an informal fee study to determine the cost of the pre-application review fee of $400. As such a review will involve multiple staff members (likely 12 total) for an average of 30 minutes each, the fee was reached by calculating the value of the time allotted for the review considering the fully loaded personnel cost for each staff member.

The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on October 26, 2021, pertaining to the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan and the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map. After reviewing pertinent documents prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and closing the hearing, the Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the attached addendums based on the findings that none of the conditions below are in evidence and there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the amendment proposal will have a significant effect on the environment.

Packet Pg. 976
Report to Redding City Council February 6, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 7 • The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. • Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. • Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.
• Mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.

The Addendums to the Negative Declaration and Mitigated Negative Declaration reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding. Pursuant to Section 15074.1(b) of CEQA, the City of Redding finds that the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map are sufficient and that the project will not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.

Packet Pg. 977
Report to Redding City Council February 6, 2022
Re: 6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update Page 8 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution
Ordinance
Location Map
General Plan Map
Zoning Map
Proposed Zoning Map
Proposed General Plan Alternative Map
DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online)
Proposed Zoning Alternative Map
Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online)
Proposed General Plan Map
Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map (available online)
Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) Packet Pg. 978
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-_____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING (1) ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION
ADOPTED FOR THE DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN, (2)

ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF REDDING ZONING
MAP, (3) ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO REDDING’S GENERAL PLAN
(GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION GPA-2021-00449), AND (4) AMENDING ITS SCHEDULE OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Redding’s General Plan on October 3, 2000, and WHEREAS, the attached proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram are desired to allow for the adoption of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update; and WHEREAS, on October 26, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to the proposed amendments to the General Plan and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram as depicted on the attached exhibit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed pertinent documents prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and recommended that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan be adopted for the proposed amendments to the Redding’s General Plan after consideration of all testimonial and written evidence submitted prior to and during the aforementioned public hearing; and
WHEREAS, on October 4, 1988, by Resolution 88-364, the City Council adopted a Schedule of Fees and Service Charges (Schedule), which has been subsequently amended from time-to-time; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said resolution, the City Manager is authorized and directed to revise, supplement and maintain the Schedule so that it will be, to the greatest extent possible, a comprehensive list of fees for City permit and services; and that a fee that is not on the Schedule will not be invalid but should be made a part thereof as the earliest possible time; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on GPA-2021-00449 on February 15, 2022;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true, correct and are adopted herein.

Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the proposed Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan and has determined that the actions contemplated will not have an adverse impact on the environment.

Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Resolution (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan as referred to the City Council by the Planning Commission.

Section 4. Pursuant to Section 15074.1(b) of CEQA, the City of Redding finds that the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map are sufficient and that the Project will not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.

Section 5. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for City of Redding Zoning Map as referred to the City Council by the Planning Commission.

Section 6. Pursuant to Government Code section 65356, the City Council hereby adopts the attached amendments to the General Plan Diagram associated with the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update as referred to the City Council by the Planning Commission.

Section 7. Notice and publication of the amendment to the General Plan has been provided pursuant to Government Code sections 65355 and 65090.

Section 8. Notice and publication of the proposed fee has been provided pursuant to Government Code sections 66018(a) and 6062a.

Section 9. The Schedule is hereby amended to establish and add a fee for Downtown PreApplications in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400.00) subject to an annual escalation based on the Commodity Channel Index unless said escalation is waived by majority vote of the City Council, and the City Council hereby finds that said Fee does not exceed the costs to the City of Redding to process each such application.

Section 10. Pursuant to Government Code section 66017, the effect date of the Downtown PreApplication Fee shall be sixty (60) days after its adoption.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Resolution (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING (1)

ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION
ADOPTED FOR THE DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN (2)

ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF REDDING ZONING MAP, (3) ADOPTING THE DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE
(SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION AMND-2021-00361), (4)

APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO REDDING ZONING MAP (REZONING
APPLICATION RZ-2021-00450), AND (5) MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT

OF A GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. Redding’s General Plan, adopted on October 3, 2000, and effective on November 2, 2000, contains guidelines for development in Downtown, as expressed in the Downtown Focus Area Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element. The preparation of a specific plan for Downtown is recommended in said guidelines.

B. The Zoning Map of the City of Redding is incorporated in and made part of the Redding Municipal Code Title 18, known as the City of Redding Zoning Ordinance.

C. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan, the attached Chapter 6 of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan (“Plan”), and to the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map; and on October 26, 2021, recommended that the City Council adopt said addendums.

D. Based on the following findings, (1) the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan is appropriate for the Plan, and (2) the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map is appropriate.

1. The City of Redding has determined that the addendums are warranted, finding that none of the conditions below are in evidence and that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the amendment proposal will have a significant effect on the environment.
a. The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) c. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them. d. Mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.

2. The Addendums to the Negative Declaration and Mitigated Negative Declaration reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding.

3. Pursuant to Section 15074.1(b) of CEQA, the City of Redding finds that the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map are sufficient and that the Project will not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.

E. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on February 15, 2022, prior to the first reading of this Ordinance.

F. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Map are consistent with the General Plan and the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update.

G. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map and Downtown Redding Specific Plan will not increase the existing height limits already permitted. Additionally, the proposed amendments would bring the existing legal nonconforming development and uses into conformance.

Therefore, adoption of this ordinance will not negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region.

H. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65451, the Plan includes all required text and diagrams.

I. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65454, the Plan is consistent with the General Plan’s goals and policies. Appendix A of the Plan identifies the goals and policies of the Community Development and Design Element, Transportation Element, Natural Resources Element, Health and Safety Element, Recreation Element, Economic Development Element, Housing Element, Public Facilities and Services Element, and Air Quality Element of the General Plan which pertain to Downtown Redding. For the following reasons, the Plan reflects and implements the numerous General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding as well as the Downtown Focus Area Development Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element:

1. The Community Development and Design Element provides guidance on development with specific focus areas of the City, including the Downtown Focus Area. The General Plan states that Downtown should present a more urban character than the rest of the City in order to distinguish it from the City's other commercial districts. The land use regulations, development standards, and design standards and guidelines of the Plan are reflective of urban development patterns, concepts, and styles, which will further distinguish the character of Downtown from the City's other commercial districts.

Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update)

2. The Health and Safety Element promotes the reduction of criminal activity through proper site design and land use planning and a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community. The Plan directly supports the goals and policies of the Health and Safety Element through its promotion of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles and active ground floors along street frontages, nighttime activities, and residential uses to increase foot traffic and provide more eyes on the street and public realm.

3. The goals and policies of the Recreation Element support the development of a citywide recreational trail system, separating bicyclists and pedestrians from vehicular traffic and pedestrian facilities from bicycle facilities whenever feasible, and increasing the acreage and quality of developed park facilities. The open space, public realm, incentives for activation, streetscape, bicycle, and wayfinding implementation strategies of the Plan support the goals and policies of the Recreation Element through the establishment of new public parks and open spaces, activating parks and open spaces with public art, establishing pedestrian and bicycle facility priorities, conceptual streetscape improvement cross sections, a comprehensive wayfinding system, and plans for the safe and efficient connectivity between Downtown, the recreational trail system, and other bicycle facilities in the vicinity of Downtown.

4. The Plan directly supports the goals and policies of the Economic Development Element through its economic development goals and implementation strategies and its Implementation Action Plan. The Implementation Action Program includes measures regarding business development services and training opportunities, establishment of a Downtown Business Association, start-up business services and assistance, development of an available sites and buildings inventory, provision of incentives to attract desired types of development and businesses, and establishment of gap financing and micro-loan programs.

5. The goals and policies of the Housing Element promote infill development where adequate public services exist, the facilitation of mixed-use development, and the provision of a wide range of housing choices in the community. The appropriate mix of 'uses implementation strategies of the Plan support the goals and policies of the Housing Element by allowing for a mix of uses, including residential, throughout the entire Plan area, encouraging land uses that attract residents to Downtown, and allowing for a variety of housing opportunities, including mixed-use developments, loft apartments, and zero lot-line cottages and townhomes.

6. The Plan directly supports the goal and related policies of the Air Quality Element to reduce motor vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled by allowing for increased mixeduse development and residential densities and supporting a balance between all modes of transportation, including active (non-motorized) transportation modes.

J. The land use designations in the Plan, map and amendments to the General Plan Diagram, are consistent with the balance of the General Plan. The land use designations in the Plan (Downtown Core and Downtown Mixed-Use districts) are consistent with the proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram to expand the Mixed-Use designation to coincide precisely with the amended Plan area boundary. The update expands the Mixed-Use designation to the east. The goals, strategies, development standards, design guidelines and Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) procedures in the Plan provide direction as new development, redevelopment, future planning, and public-improvement efforts occur within the Specific Plan area.

K. The Plan is necessary to properly implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The Implementation section of the General Plan identifies the adoption of a Specific Plan and Development Guidelines for Downtown Redding to address the following: Appropriate land use classifications; desired mixed-use concepts; parking; and linkage to other districts. The Plan is an update of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan adopted in 2001and amended in both 2010 and 2018. The Plan addresses the aforementioned issues relative to current conditions and the community’s present long-term vision for Downtown Redding. It is important to assess the adequacy of adopted specific plans from time to time to ensure that they remain effective in implementing General Plan goals and policies and in achieving the community’s evolving vision for specific plan areas. The intent of the Plan is to improve upon the implementation of the General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding.

L. Adoption of this Ordinance will not negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region. As specified above, there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the proposed Plan will have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Negative Declaration prepared for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan.

Section 4. The City Council hereby adopts the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the City of Redding Zoning Map.

Section 5. The City Council hereby adopts the attached Plan, which shall supersede the Downtown Redding Specific Plan adopted in 2001 and amended in 2010 and 2018.

Section 6. The boundaries of the districts referred to in Section 18.01.050 of the Redding Municipal Code, as designated on a map entitled “Zoning Map of the City of Redding, California,” dated January 7, 2003, are hereby altered as set forth on the map attached hereto.

Section 7. The City Council hereby adopts the amendments to the City of Redding Zoning Map, as designated on the attached map, which are hereby incorporated into Title 18 of the Redding Municipal Code.

Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases may be held invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 9. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption; and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause its publication according to law.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that this ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 15th day of February, 2022, and was read and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ____ day of __________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: Ordinance (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
Dr
Grape Ave
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff Dr
Octavia St
Eleventh St
Skyline Dr
Eureka Way
Ada St
Lee St
Oak Ridge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Canal Dr
Rose Ave
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Chestnut St
Butte St
Liberty
St
Benton Dr
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

LOCATION MAP GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 20, 2021 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Specific Plan Proposed Addition
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
2010 Specific Plan Boundary
Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: Location Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update)

3.5 to 6
GC
GO
GC
PF-I-S
GWY
PF-I
PK
GO
GO
PF-I
PF-I
LO
HC
PF-I
GO
GWY
6 to 10
20 to 30
6 to 10
6 to 10
PF-I-S
GO
GC
6 to 10
PF-I
GO
LO
NC
NC
6 to 10
PF- I
GWY
PF-I
GC
GWY
PK
MUC
10 to 20 GO
LO

3.5 to 6
MUC
MUC

3.5 to 6

3.5 to 6
GO 3.5 to 6
6 to 10
GC
MUC
PF-I
20 to 30
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
D
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
idge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Ca
n
al Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

GENERAL PLAN MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
General Plan
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

SACRAMENTO RIVER

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING
Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: General Plan Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) RS-3.5
PF

DMUD-SP-BH
PF

DCD-SP-BH
GC
RM-6
OS
GO
GO
PF

DMUD-SP
GC
GO
PF
HC
GO-BH
GC-VR
RM-9
PF-BH
RM-20

DMUD-SP
GO-BH
GO
GO
LO
RM-9
RM-9
LO
PF
GO
GO
NC
RM-9
OS
RM-9
NC
RM-12
RM-18
RM-9
OS-SP
PF
PF

DMUD-SP-BH
GC-VR
RM-12
LO
RS-4
PF

DCD-SP-BH
RS-4
LO
LO
PF-SP
RS-3.5
RM-10

DMUD-SP-BH

DMUD-SP-BH
PF
GC-VR
RM-20
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
Dr
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
Ridge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Canal Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Che
stnut St
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

ZONING MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
Zoning District
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: Zoning Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) RS-3.5
PF
PF

DMUD-SP-BH
PF

DCD-SP-BH
GC
RM-6
OS
GO
GO
PF
GC-VR

DMUD-SP
GC
GC-VR
RM-20

DMUD-SP
HC
GC-VR
RM-9

DMUD-SP-BH
RM-20

DMUD-SP
GO
LO
RM-9
RM-9
LO
PF
GO
GO
NC
RM-9
OS
RM-9
NC
RM-12
RM-18
RM-9
PF
PF
PF
GO-BH
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
Dr
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
Ridge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Canal Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Che
stnut St
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

PROPOSED ZONING MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
Proposed Zoning
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: Proposed Zoning Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) MUC
PF-I

3.5 to 6
GC
GC
PF-I-S
PF-I
PK
GO
GO
GC
MUC
PF-I
LO
20 to 30
HC
MUC
GO
GWY
6 to 10
20 to 30
6 to 10
6 to 10
PF-I-S
GO
GC
6 to 10
PF-I
GO
LO
NC
NC
6 to 10
PF-I
PK
GWY
GWY
GO
MUC
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
D
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
idge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Ca
n
al Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Proposed General Plan Land Use
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

ALTERNATIVE

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: Proposed General Plan Alternative Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-1

INTRODUCTION
This chapter establishes the land use regulations, development standards, and design standards and guidelines for the Specific Plan area. The intent of these regulations, standards, and guidelines is to implement the applicable goals and policies of the Redding General Plan and the Specific Plan. Where the regulations and standards of the Specific Plan differ from the Redding Zoning Ordinance, the Specific Plan shall take precedence unless otherwise specified herein. Where the Specific Plan is silent, the Zoning Ordinance shall take precedence. Words, phrases, and terms not specifically defined herein shall have the same definition as provided for in the Zoning Ordinance.

The Specific Plan Overlay District will be applied to the entire Specific Plan area on the City of Redding’s official zoning map. That way, persons interested in knowing the zoning of property within the Specific Plan area will know to refer to the Specific Plan rather than to the Zoning Ordinance.

In approving individual development projects requiring
discretionary approval, the approving body (Development Services Director (Director), Board of Administrative Review, Planning Commission, or City Council) may impose additional requirements where warranted to accomplish the goals, policies, and implementation strategies of the Redding General Plan and the Specific Plan.

ZONING DISTRICTS
The Specific Plan area is comprised of two zoning
districts, the Downtown Core District and the
Downtown Mixed-Use District (see Figure 6.1). The
specific land uses allowed within each district and the specific development and design standards that pertain
to each district are described in detail in the Land Use Regulations, Development Standards, and Design
Standards and Guidelines subsections, respectively.

Building Height Overlay
Districts
There are two building height overlay districts that
affect the Specific Plan area, the Highrise and Midrise Building Height Overlay Districts; the boundaries of
the Highrise District coincide with the Downtown Core
District and the Midrise District comprises a portion of the Downtown Mixed-Use District (as shown on Figure

6.1). The Highrise District allows unlimited height; the Midrise District allows heights up to 75 feet.

6. Regulations, Standards,
and Guidelines
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-2 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Figure 6.1: ZONING
Chapter 6
Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-3

LAND USE REGULATIONS
Each zoning district has a unique set of regulations pertaining to land uses which are permitted, permitted with the
approval of a use permit, or prohibited:

Permitted (P): Permitted uses are required to obtain a zoning clearance prior to issuance of any permits or authorization for the proposed use or construction.

Permitted with the Approval of a Site Development Permit (SDP): These uses typically have unusual site development features or operating characteristics requiring special consideration. They may be permitted subject to specific conditions that ensure that the use will be designed,
located, and operated in a manner compatible with
adjacent properties and the surrounding area and in
compliance with the goals and policies of the Specific Plan and General Plan. These uses are permitted with the
approval of a site development permit by the Board of
Administrative Review.

Permitted with the Approval of a Use Permit (U):

These uses typically have unusual site development
features or operating characteristics requiring special consideration. They may be permitted subject to
specific conditions that ensure that the use will be
designed, located, and operated in a manner
compatible with adjacent properties and the
surrounding area and in compliance with the goals and
policies of the Specific Plan and General Plan. These
uses are permitted with the approval of a use permit by the Planning Commission.

Prohibited (―): Uses which are not permitted.

The land use regulations contained in this chapter shall apply to all new development, including additions and
changes in use, as described in Chapter 7,
Administration and Implementation. All new
developments including additions are subject to a PreApplication process.

Table 6-1 presents the land use regulations for the
Specific Plan area’s Downtown Core District and
Downtown Mixed Use District.

Table 6-1: DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS

DOWNTOWN CORE DOWNTOWN MIXED USE
Residential Uses
Mixed-Use Development P P
Multiple Family Residential U P (<= 4 units) / SDP (> 4 units) P Two-Family Dwelling ― ―
Single-Family Dwelling ― ―
Condominium P P
Group Residential ― ―
Supportive Housing/Transitional Housing ―SDP ―SDP
Transitional Housing ― ―
Residential Cannabis Cultivation P5 P5
Public and Semipublic Uses
College and Trade Schools USDP/P (2nd floor and
above)1
P
Schools, Public or Private ― P
Offices, Business and Professional P (2nd floor and above)1 P Offices, Medical and Dental P (2nd floor and above)1 P
Government Offices P (2nd floor and above)1 USDP/P (2nd floor and above)1 Clinics P (2nd floor and above)6 USDP/P (2nd floor and above)6 Clubs and Lodges USDP P
Community Social Service Facilities ― ―
Homeless Shelter ― ―
Community Centers (primary use) P (2nd floor and above)6 U/P (2nd floor and above)6 Community Centers (non-primary use) P2 P2
Park and Recreation Facilities (excluding community centers) P P Cultural Institutions P P
Hospitals (including emergency care) ― U
(Table continues on following page.)
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-4 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Table 6-1: DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS (CONTINUED)

DOWNTOWN CORE DOWNTOWN MIXED USE
Public and Semipublic Uses (continued)
Public Safety Facilities P P
Religious Facilities (primary use) P (2nd floor and above)6 USDP/P (2nd floor and above)6 Religious Facilities (non-primary use) P2 P2
Surface Parking Lots, Public and Commercial P P
Parking Structures, Public and Commercial USDP P
Residential Care, Senior / General USDP USDP
Residential Care, General U U
Commercial Uses
Condominum P P
R & D Research Facility or Office P (2nd floor and above)6 P Retail Sales P3 P3
Food and Beverage Sales P P
Food and Beverage Preparation P P
Restaurants, Full Service P P
Restaurants, Drive-Thru ― U
Bars/Night Clubs/Lounges P P
Convenience Gas Mart ― USDP
Retail Cannabis Sales ― ―
Retail Cannabis Sales / Commercial Cannabis Cultivation ― ― Food Trucks (Private Property) P
7 P7
Banks, with Drive-Thru ― USDP
Banks, without Drive-Thru P (<=2,000 sq.ft. on ground floor) P (2nd floor and above)6
P
Automobile/Vehicle Service and Repair, Minor ― U
Automobile/Vehicle Repair, Major ― ―
Automobile/Vehicle Sales and Leasing, Outdoor ― U
Automobile/Vehicle Sales and Leasing, Indoor P P
Automobile Rentals ―P (Rental Office Only – 2nd floor
and above)
USDP
Automobile Washing ― USDP
Heavy Equipment Sales, Service and Rental ― ―
Large Vehicle Sales, Service and Rental ― ―
Vehicle Storage ― ―
Personal Services P4 P4
Personal Improvement Services P P
Travel Services P P
Hotels and Motels P P
Bed and Breakfast Establishments P P
Funeral Parlors and Mortuaries ― P
Laboratories USDP/P (2nd floor and above) P
Adult Business Establishments ― ―
Animal Sales and Services P P
Building Materials and Services ― ―
Home Improvement Sales and Services ―P (<= 5,000 sq. ft.) 8 ―P (<= 5,000 sq.ft.) 8 SDP (> 5,000 sq. ft) 8
Business Services USDP/P (2nd floor and above) P
Maintenance and Repair Services USDP/P (2nd floor and above) P Commercial Recreation USDP USDP
Commercial Entertainment P P
Industrial Uses
Industry, Custom Handicraft P P
Industry, General ― ―
Industry, Heavy ― ―
(Table continues on following page.)
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-5
Table 6-1: DOWNTOWN REDDING SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS (CONTINUED)

DOWNTOWN CORE DOWNTOWN MIXED USE
Industrial Uses (continued)
Cannabis Distribution, Manufacturing, Processing, Testing, and
Storage
― ―
Warehousing and Storage ― ―
Transportation, Communication and Utilities
Communication Facilities, Antennae and Transmission Towers U U Communication Facilities Within Buildings USDP/P (2nd floor and above) USDP/P (2nd floor and above) Transportation Passenger Terminals U U
Utilities, Minor P P
Utilities, Major ― ―
1 Use permitted in buildings in existence at the time of adoption of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update. In buildings constructed following the adoption of the Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update, use permitted within non-street-fronting ground floor spaces, and within street-fronting ground floor spaces when such use will not occupy a majority of the street-fronting ground floor space of the subject building or site, subject to the approval of a Site Development Permit by the Development Services Director 2 The subject space must be utilized by a single permitted primary use for a majority of the total time the space is utilized on a typical weekly basis. 3 Businesses whose primary use consists of selling tobacco and/or electronic/vapor smoking products and/or products designed for consuming tobacco and cannabis are is prohibited within the Downtown Specific Plan Area.
4 Businesses whose primary use consists of tattoo and/or massage services are prohibitedis Permitted with the Approval of a Use Permit. 5 Indoor cannabis cultivation permitted in accordance with the provisions of Redding Municipal Code Chapter 6.12. 6 Use permitted within non-street-fronting ground floor spaces. Use permitted within street-fronting ground floor spaces when such use will not occupy a majority of the street-fronting ground floor space of the subject building or site, subject to the approval of a Site Development Permit by the Development Services Director. 7 Businesses whose primary use consists of preparation and consumption of food, sold in Food Trucks are permitted as an accessory use in accordance with the provisions of RMC Chapter - 18.17.020.K. 68 Home Improvement Sales and Services – Plant Nurseries with screened outdoor yards are Permitted.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-6 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS
Table 6-2 presents the Development Standards for the
Downtown Core District and Downtown Mixed Use District.

Table 6-2: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

(Table continues on following page.)

STANDARDS DOWNTOWN
CORE

DOWNTOWN

MIXED USE ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS
Dwelling Units Per Gross Acre Unlimited 301
1Density bonuses may be granted in accordance with
Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18.26.

Minimum Lot Area (Square Feet) NA NA
Minimum Lot Frontage (Feet) 20 20
Minimum Lot Depth (Feet) NA NA
Minimum Building Height (Stories) 2 2
2, 3
2Less than two stories may be permitted with the
approval of a Site Development Permit by the Director.
3Properties adjacent to a single-family zoning district shall not exceed 35 feet in height.

Maximum Building Height (Feet) Unlimited 7543
34Roof elements, mechanical penthouses, and other
elements that add visual interest to a building may exceed 75 feet in height.

All roof-mounted equipment shall be screened, consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Special
consideration shall be given to the location and screening of noise generating equipment such as refrigeration units, air conditioning, and exhaust fans. Noise-reducing screens and insulation may be required where such equipment has the potential to impact residential uses.

Minimum Parking Setback (Feet)
Front NA4 NA54 54Parking that is accessory to an on-site use is not permitted adjacent to the street in the Downtown Core
and Downtown Mixed-Use districts except as described
below. All parking that is accessory to an on-site use shall be provided in the rear of the building accessible from an alley; properties without alley access are permitted to have one driveway for access to parking. In the Downtown Core and the Downtown Mixed-Use districts, with the approval of a site development permit by the Director, parking that is accessory to an on-site use may be permitted adjacent to the street not to exceed 50 percent of the property frontage with a minimum setback of 5 feet; parking permitted
adjacent to the street shall be screened from public view to the satisfaction of the Director. Where parking is the primary use of a site in the Specific Plan area, parking is permitted adjacent to the street with no minimum setback; however, vehicles shall be prevented from encroaching
into the public right-of-way through the use of walls, curbs, wheel stops, above-ground tree planters, or other methods Side (Interior) 0 0
Side (Corner) NA4 NA4
Rear 0 0
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 996 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-7
Table 6-2: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (CONTINUED)

STANDARDS DOWNTOWN
CORE

DOWNTOWN

MIXED USE ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS
Maximum Building Setback (Feet)
Front 0
5 065 65Buildings shall be placed immediately adjacent to the back of sidewalk, except for plazas, outdoor seating areas, paseos, corner “cut-offs”, public art, and similar pedestrianoriented features to the satisfaction of the Director.

Side (Interior) NA NA
Side (Corner) 0
5 05
Rear NA NA
Additional Standards
Nonconforming Uses and Structures
Where at the time of the adoption of this updated Specific Plan, a lawful use, structure, or site exists which would otherwise not be permitted by the regulations established herein, such use, structure, or site may be continued
indefinitely subject to the provisions of Redding Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18.46, with the following exception:

Legal nonconforming uses, structures, and sites within the Specific Plan area shall be considered abandoned if the use ceases, the structure remains vacant, or the use of the site ceases for a continuous period of three years.

Installation of Public Improvements
Project developers are responsible for providing public improvements such as streets, water and sewer lines,
drainage facilities, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, and other similar items in compliance with City standards at the time of development. These improvements may be in the public right-of-way adjacent to the property.

If multiple phases of development are proposed,
improvements shall be installed during the first phase as deemed appropriate by the approving body. For the purpose of this requirement, development shall also include the expansion of existing structures by 50 percent or more of the gross floor area.

Underground Utilities
All electrical, telephone, cable television, and similar distribution lines providing direct services to a development site shall be installed underground within the site. The Director may waive this requirement upon a determination that the installation is infeasible. Where applicable, Specific Plan area developments shall comply with the provisions of Redding Municipal Code Title 14, Utilities.

Pop-Up Uses
Cities across the United States are encouraging and
streamlining Pop-up Uses in their vacant storefronts and buildings. “Pop-up uses” refer to uses that are temporary and typically do not exceed a duration of six months. Where they have been successful they have given multiple benefits, including activation of empty retail spaces, generation of excitement and additional visitors, and opportunities for new businesses to test the market. Following are new standards for accommodating and encouraging pop-up businesses in
Downtown Redding. These standards apply to the Specific Plan area only (Downtown Core District and Downtown
Mixed-Use District).
• Pop-up Uses are defined as temporary uses in existing buildings. These uses may be assembly, business,
mercantile, and storage (ancillary to a permissible
primary use).
• Pop-up uses do not require a final certificate of
occupancy, but do require a temporary certificate of
occupancy.
• Pop-up Uses shall be located on private property, not on public rights-of-way.
• Pop-up hours of operation: 8 am-10 pm.
• Length of time at a location Pop-up Uses are
permitted: maximum of 6 months, with one renewal
allowable.
• Pop-up Uses are not required to provide off-street
parking.
• Pop-up Uses must adhere to zoning requirements for
signage, restrooms, and life/fire safety.
• Pop-up Uses must meet approval of Fire Marshal if
involving hot food service.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-8 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Trees and Shade
Well-maintained, mature trees significantly add to the
character and aesthetic charm of downtown areas and
also provide shade and increase pedestrian comfort. The City aims to protect and enhance the aesthetic qualities of Downtown Redding provided by trees and to promote a
healthy and attractive urban landscape as growth continues.

The City Council adopted the Downtown Redding Street Tree Management Plan in December 2017, which inventoried all trees within the plan’s area and identified trees in need of removal and pruning, as well as sites where new trees should be planted. The Street Tree Plan recommends a pruning plan to keep Downtown Redding’s trees healthy for the longterm, and recommends increasing the size of tree planters wherever possible to allow for healthy root systems; when the width of a sidewalk prevents existing tree planters from being widened, they should be lengthened along the street alignment to provide greater soil surface area, allow for root/ air exchange, water infiltration, and reduce the possibility of damage to adjacent sidewalks. In addition, it
recommends the following treatment to improve the life of trees:
• Maximize distance to infrastructure.
• De-compact and amend soils.
• Integrate alternative paving systems.
• Re-route sidewalks.
• Utilize tree grates.

Specifically, Silva Cells, structural soils, pervious concrete, alternative paving, and bioswales/rain gardens are
recommended to reduce impervious hardscape in Downtown
Redding, thereby helping the root systems of street trees, and stormwater filtration, in general.

New development must provide and maintain street trees
along building frontage(s) in keeping with the plan, or must provide a covered arcade over adjacent sidewalk(s).

Depending on space constraints, planting sites should be covered with tree grates on sidewalks in long, linear beds, or in bulb-out beds to protect roots and soil.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-9
Parking Requirements
Downtown Core District
Within the Downtown Core District, off-street parking is not required. However, if parking is provided within the Downtown Core District, it shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Redding Zoning Ordinance Section

18.41.030.L.1.

Downtown Mixed-Use District
Because the Downtown Mixed- U s e District is envisioned as a pedestrian-first environment with bicycle facilities, pedestrian amenities, and mixed-use development, it is
appropriate for the off-street parking requirements within this district to be different than citywide standards. The following parking standards shall apply to all change of use, expansion, and new construction proposals within the Downtown Mixed-Use District:
• Multiple Family Residential: One space per unit
• Mixed Use Development: The parking requirement
shall be equal to the sum of the parking requirement
for each proposed use; the parking requirement for
uses other than multiple family residential may be
reduced pursuant to the standards as follows.
• For uses other than multiple-family residential, the
off-street parking requirements shall be 25 percent
less than the standards of Zoning Ordinance Section

18.41.040; these requirements may be further
reduced by the Director or Planning Commission in
accordance with the following standards.

Additional Parking Reductions
Additional parking reductions for all uses other than multiple family residential may be granted by the Director pursuant to the following Tiers 1-3 provisions that follow. The total parking reduction granted by the Director shall not exceed 75 percent, except in cases where the net parking requirement is four spaces or less, in which case the Director may grant a reduction of up to 100 percent. Reductions of greater than 75 percent may be permitted by the Planning Commission
through the granting of a use permit.

Tier 1
• Off-site, off-street parking located within 1,000 feet of the subject property may satisfy up to 100 percent of
the parking requirement for a project. The location of
off-site parking for a project may be changed at any
time subject to the approval of the Director.
• Where parties wish to cooperatively establish and
operate parking facilities where one use generates
parking demands primarily during hours when the
remaining use(s) is not in operation or where adjacent
uses generate joint/redundant trips, a reduction of up
to 50 percent of the required parking may be approved
by the Director. Such approvals shall require the
submission of satisfactory statements by the parties
providing such facilities and the parties such facilities are to serve, describing the nature of the uses and
times when such uses operate so as to indicate the lack of conflict between such uses.
• Off-site and joint parking approvals shall require
such documents or commitments as may be deemed
necessary in each particular case to ensure provision
and maintenance of the required off-street parking
spaces.

Tier 2
The Director may grant up to an additional 25 percent
reduction if the development provides one or more of the following:
• Public plazas located outside the public right-of-way which are at least 500 square feet in area and at least 10 feet in width.
• Investments in off-site bicycle or pedestrian trail
improvements.

Tier 3
The Director may grant up to an additional 25 percent
reduction for active transportation improvements and/or the provision of transit passes. For improvements provided within the public right-of-way, a reduction of up to one space may be granted per $6,000 worth of improvements, as
determined by the City Engineer. Eligible active
transportation improvements include but are not limited to the following:
• On-site bicycle facilities in excess of those required by the California Green Building Standards Code.
• Elimination of existing driveways along street
frontages.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-10 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
• Provision of off-street vehicle passenger loading/
unloading zones.
• Exceedances of the applicable development and
design standards which support the active
transportation objectives of the Specific Plan.
• Reduction of one space for each transit pass purchased from the Redding Area Bus Authority for one individual
for a period of 10 years; the purchase of multiple
passes equivalent to one individual for a period of
10 years shall be acceptable. Such passes shall be
provided to one or more resident, business owner, or
employee of the subject project at no cost.
• Other similar type improvements to the public realm
that enhances active transportation or transit as
determined by the Director of Development Services,
including but not limited to:
» Enhanced intersections, such as pedestrian signal
upgrades, crosswalk/bicycle facility striping, rapid
flashing beacons, and bulb-outs.
» Art, street furniture, landscaping (hanging flowers,
pots, etc.) provided within the public right-of-way.

Other Requirements in Downtown Redding
Recognizing the uniqueness of existing buildings and their associated parking within the Specific Plan area, within either district, when parking is required or provided for any remodel or reuse of any existing building, parking
standards (i.e., space and aisle dimensions, number of
spaces) may be reduced or modified subject to approval
of a site development permit by the Director.

Bicycle Parking
Bicycle parking shall be provided with new development
and remodel/reuse of existing buildings in accordance with the requirements of the California Green Building Standards Code.

Special Use Regulations and
Standards
Special use regulations and standards apply to sidewalk dining, outdoor uses and displays, and vehicle sales and repair to ensure that such uses do not adversely impact adjoining properties.

Sidewalk dining that lines the sidewalk while maintaining a clear pedestrian path enlivens the street.

Merchandise in front of shops during business hours can activate the street if they maintain a clear pedestrian path.

Sidewalk Dining
Sidewalk dining on public or private streets can enhance the pedestrian ambiance of Downtown Redding and is
encouraged. The rules, regulations, and applicable areas are defined in Redding Municipal Code Chapter 13.25.

Outdoor Uses and Displays
All uses, including commercial, repair, service, and storage shall be conducted within a completely enclosed building or be completely screened from public view, except as provided as follows.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1000 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-11
A wall-mounted sign should be in keeping with the
building’s style and made of quality materials.

Window signs in retail storefronts in Downtown Redding
should complement the display and merchandise.

A projecting sign, sometimes referred to as a fin sign, provides an easy way for pedestrians to spot businesses.

The outdoor display of merchandise in conjunction with
specialty retail, antique shops, flower shops, and similar specialty and craft businesses is permitted within the Specific Plan area subject to the following provisions:
• Temporary outdoor displays may be allowed on
developed properties (excluding parking lots) and
upon public sidewalks provided that a minimum width
of five feet (unless approved by Development Services
Director) shall be maintained clear of any obstructions, and the display shall not obstruct access to the
entrance of any building or access ramps.
• No additional signs or other advertising devices
(temporary or permanent) shall be used in conjunction
with an outdoor display, except those allowed in
compliance with the Redding Zoning Ordinance and
this Specific Plan.
• The outdoor display of merchandise shall only occur
during times when the associated establishment is also
open for business.
• Outdoor display fixtures shall be of good quality and durable materials and construction and shall be
maintained in such a manner as to enhance Downtown
Redding. Merchandise displays utilizing card tables;
cardboard cartons; folding chairs; lightweight materials; or deteriorated, damaged, splintered, or other similar
furniture are not permitted.
• Additional temporary outdoor display and sales
(including in parking lots) may be permitted in
accordance with Redding Zoning Ordinance Section

18.17.020.E.

Sign Regulations
Signs within the Specific Plan area, including temporary signs, shall be erected, constructed, altered, and maintained in accordance with the regulations of this Specific Plan.

The purpose of the sign regulations in this subsection is to provide the means for adequate identification of buildings and businesses by regulating and controlling the design, size, and location of all signs within the Specific Plan area. The intent of these regulations is to establish specific standards for all exterior signage to ensure continuity, consistency, and harmony with the pedestrian quality of the Specific Plan area.

No person shall erect, construct, enlarge, alter, move, improve, remove, convert, or equip any sign or sign structure Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-12 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
or cause or permit the same to be done contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of these sign regulations.

Sign Standards for Permitted Signs in the
Specific Plan Area
Wall-Mounted Signs. Wall-mounted signs can be a maximum of one square foot per linear foot of business establishment per public street and/or alley frontage located not higher than the lowest of the following:
• 25 feet above grade.
• Bottom of the sill line of the second-floor window.

Murals. Wall murals shall meet the following regulations:
• The mural can be up to 300 square feet by-right and
greater than 300 square feet with the approval of an
administrative sign permit.
• The mural shall demonstrate artistic quality or theme as opposed to direct or indirect illustrative advertising. • When bands of color or lines use the wall, building
facade, or parapet as either figure or ground, then the entire surface of these areas shall be included as part of the mural area.
• The mural shall not be placed on decorative block or
brick walls.
• Approval of the mural shall take into consideration the visual effect of the mural on adjoining properties and
the overall architecture of the building. The colors and materials used shall be reasonably harmonious with
those in the area.
• The Director may require a site development permit if the sign could have an aesthetic impact or be
controversial.

Permanent Window Signs. On the ground floor, coverage
shall not exceed 20 percent of the total window and door area visible from the exterior of the building including furniture and temporary signs as well as permanent window signs; on second floors, coverage shall not exceed 25 percent per window. This will ensure transparency between the
business and the sidewalk to help provide eyes on the street.

Awning Signs. On the ground floor, each awning shall not exceed a maximum coverage of 20 percent of the total
ground floor exterior surface area. On second floors and above, each awning shall not exceed a maximum coverage
of 10 percent of the total second floor exterior surface area.

Internal cabinet-type illumination is not allowed.

Sandwich board signs that are out of the pedestrian path are allowed.

Projecting Signs. One projecting sign per business is
allowed; maximum size may not exceed 10 square feet and shall not extend more than 3 feet from the wall surface.

Internal illumination is prohibited. Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings, not to poles or other signs.

Projecting signs may encroach into the public right-of-way a maximum of 3 feet; minimum of 7-foot vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. Theater marquees (e.g., Cascade Theatre) are exempt from this requirement.

Under Canopy Signs. One sidewalk-oriented sign per
business is allowed under a canopy, roof, awning, covered walkway, arcade, or porch; a maximum of 4 square feet per business entrance is allowed; minimum of 7-foot vertical clearance is required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign.

A-Frame/Sandwich Board Signs. One A-frame or sandwich
board sign allowed per business with a maximum size of 4 feet high by 2 feet wide. No illumination is allowed. The sign shall be located on the sidewalk adjacent to the curb. A clear pathway of at least 4 feet in width shall be maintained for passage of pedestrians; however, more space is preferred.

The sign shall only be present during regular business hours.

Temporary Signs. Temporary signs shall abide by the
provisions of Chapter 18.42 of the Redding Zoning Ordinance regulating temporary signs.

Menu Boards. One menu board, up to 4 square feet in area, is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment.

Menu boards may contain only the name of the establishment and the food available inside. The menu board must be
located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-13
Monument Signs. A maximum of one double-face sign
per street frontage is permitted in the Downtown
Mixed-Use District. Height of the sign shall not exceed 6 feet above grade and the width shall not exceed 4
feet. Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12 inches in height. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated.

Internal illumination is prohibited.

Multi-Tenant Project Signs. Any project that proposes to provide space for more than one tenant shall indicate the size and approximate location of all signs to be erected on the property at the time of initial application. Signs shall be shown on elevation drawings with accurate dimensions provided.

Sign Materials
Substantial, long-lasting, quality materials should be used in all cases. Separate cut-out letters are encouraged.

Sign Lighting
Internally lit cabinet signs are discouraged. Spot lighting from separate fixtures is encouraged. Lights should be sized and aimed appropriately to minimize light spillover and glare.

Prohibited Signs in the Specific Plan
AreaDowntown Core District
The following signs are prohibited within the Specific Plan area in order to improve the appearance and pedestrian
oriented environment as follows:
• Freestanding pole signs
• Monument signs
• Roof-mounted signs
• Rotating, moving, signs
• Window signs above the second floor
• Signs constructed of paper, cloth, balloons, plastic
streamers or bunting
• Signs that mimic regulatory traffic signage
• Any sign prohibited by the Redding Municipal Code
and not expressly “Permitted” by this Specific Plan
Rule of Measurement
The area of a wall sign or logo with individual letters shall be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol.

Exceptions
The following are exceptions to the sign standards
listed above:
• By approval of an administrative sign permit, the
Director may authorize an exception to the Specific
Plan sign regulations when, in the opinion of the
Director, the exception is in keeping with the intent of the regulations and the character of the Specific Plan. or is for the refurbishment, reuse, and/or relocation of any sign that does not conform to the standards of the
City’s Sign Ordinance.
• Identifier sign(s) for any Downtown improvement
district, or similar marketing organization or entity
operating within the Specific Plan area, may be
authorized by approval of an administrative sign
permit by the Director. The height, size, and design of the identifier sign(s) shall be established by the permit approval upon a determination by the Director that the
identifier sign is in character with the Specific Plan.

DESIGN STANDARDS AND

GUIDELINES
The design standards and guidelines in this chapter are meant to achieve quality design and are to be used during the City’s development review process to assess a project’s conformity with the Specific Plan. Design standards are mandatory and are intended to improve the quality of
design, whereas design guidelines are advisory and are most applicable to projects requiring approval of a discretionary action by the City.

The design standards and guidelines acknowledge the
prevailing built environment and development patterns
within Downtown Redding today. These standards and
guidelines, therefore, do not seek to impose an overriding style, a limited color palette, or an artificial theme, but to promote Downtown Redding’s positive design
characteristics. It is not the intent of these design standards and guidelines to eliminate design freedom or discourage innovative design. The design standards and guidelines
complement the mandatory development standards
contained in this chapter, and the Redding Zoning Ordinance by providing good examples of appropriate design solutions and by providing design interpretations of the various
mandatory and advisory regulations. The standards and
guidelines are less quantitative than the mandatory
development standards and, therefore, may be interpreted with some flexibility in their application to specific projects.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-14 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
The design standards and guidelines are organized into
the following sections:

1. Interpretation provides an overview of the purpose,
application, exemption, organization, and other aspects of the design standards.

2. Applicability provides guidelines for when these
standards are appropriate.

3. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) includes design considerations for reducing
opportunities for crime to occur through enhanced
natural surveillance, natural access control, and
territoriality.

4. Site Planning and Design includes standards for building and parking location and design in relationship to the
street (its street edge condition).

5. Storefront Design provides standards that promote
quality design for new infill buildings and rehabilitation of existing buildings.

6. Building Design presents standards that promote quality buildings within the Downtown Redding Specific Plan
area.

7. Landscaping/Hardscape Design provides a basic landscape design framework which is to be used in conjunction with new development, and as a helpful tool for property owners interested in upgrading the
landscaping of existing development.

8. Parking, Circulation and Access provides standards for good design of parking, circulation and access.

Interpretation
To aid in the interpretation of these standards, an applicant should understand that the design standards presented in this chapter will be enforced unless an alternative measure meets or exceeds the intent of the standards, and it can be satisfactorily demonstrated that there is a significant and compelling reason to deviate from them. Design guidelines help articulate the standards, but are recommendations, not requirements unless required in conjunction with the
approval of a discretionary action by the City.

Applicability
The provisions of this section are applicable to all
development within the Specific Plan area.

Any new building, addition, exterior alteration, landscaping, modification to an approved landscaping plan, or parking lot design shall adhere to these design standards, as applicable.

It is important to note, however, that these standards do not affect existing buildings which are not proposed for new construction, exterior alterations, landscaping, or changes in the parking lot layout.

The design standards will be utilized during the City’s development review process to achieve the highest level of design quality and at the same time provide the flexibility necessary to encourage creativity on the part of project designers in response to existing site conditions.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-15
Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design
The concept of Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design (CPTED) is a multi-disciplinary approach to create safer, more vibrant, and more active environments. The
CPTED concept uses a variety of community design strategies aimed at reducing opportunities for crime and the fear of crime, and increasing opportunities for social interaction and activity, through the proper design, redesign, and effective use of the built environment. Although crime and safety issues are dynamic and complex processes that go beyond planning and design, development standards and design
guidelines can help create safer environments.

These CPTED principles are meant to assist in reducing the potential for crime incidents and help to create a safer, healthier, and more vibrant Downtown Redding. Many of the development standards and design standards and guidelines in this chapter follow these CPTED principles. Specific CPTED guidelines can be viewed in Appendix B.

CPTED involves design of physical space in the context of the needs of bona fide users of the space, the activity planned for the space, and the predictable behavior of bona fide, as well as illegitimate, users.

The five key principles of CPTED are:

1. Access Control uses design features to create
boundaries between public, private, and semi-private
spaces.

2. Natural Surveillance focuses on the placement and
design of physical features and the arrangement of
uses to allow people engaged in their normal activity
to passively observe the space around them.

3. Territorial Reinforcement entails design features and physical elements which convey a sense of “active”
ownership of and sense of pride for a space; these
elements clearly designate between public, private,
and semi-private areas.

4. Management and Maintenance involves the proper
administration and upkeep of buildings, walkways,
landscaping, lighting, and other physical features to
support and ensure the intended purpose of a space.

5. Activation of Space encourages strategies to activate the space with proper uses, fosters social interaction, and creates a sense of ownership and community
through placemaking elements.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-16 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
A well-maintained parking lot with a designated pedestrian path controls access.

Ground-floor retail that faces the sidewalk with permeable windows provides views inside and out, defined outdoor seating designates semi-private areas from the public walkway, and a well-cared for streetscape make active ownership known.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-17
Site Planning and Design
Development Standards in Table 6-2 provide the minimum
setback requirements for buildings and parking. All projects in Downtown Redding should follow the prescribed edge
conditions, with the exception of the following design
standards as illustrated in Figure 6.2.

Design Standards
■ Buildings set back from the street along front and/or side street property lines must be designed for active, public use, such as pedestrian plazas, outdoor seating
areas, green spaces, paseos, or “corner cut-offs.”
■ Create continuous pedestrian activity in an
uninterrupted sequence by minimizing gaps between
buildings.
■ Within the Downtown Core District, no parking shall
be located within any front yard or corner-side yard
setback (see the following parking section for specific parking requirements). Pedestrian paseos to parking
are encouraged.
■ Fencing in the front of a building at 0-foot setback is permitted at a maximum allowable height of 4 feet
unless integrated with the façade of the building. The
material used for such fence is subject to approval of a Site Development Permit by Director. Chain link shall
be prohibited.

Design Guidelines
» Locate the principal façade and entry to buildings towards the public right-of-way or off a publicly accessible courtyard to ensure pedestrian safety and retail
visibility.
» Design and place buildings, lighting, windows, entrances and exits, parking lots, walkways, landscaping, trees,
fences, walls, signage, public art, and any other physical feature to direct the public to public spaces, and deter access to private spaces. On sites where restricted
access is necessary, use perimeter walls/fences that
allow people to see inside and out. In general, security gates are discouraged as they create an impression
of an unwelcome community.
» Provide lighting that makes pedestrians more visible
and provides more visibility to pedestrians; is even,
uniform, and does not produce dark areas; illuminates
areas above or near building entryways; and illuminates “safe routes” with pedestrian-scale, glare-free lighting so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6 -18 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
FIGURE 6.2: SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN
Packet Pg. 1008 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-19
Storefront Design
Storefronts traditionally experience the greatest amount of change during a building’s life and hold the most potential for creative alterations affecting both the character of the building and the streetscape as a whole. In an effort to promote quality design for new infill buildings, and the rehabilitation of existing buildings, the following specific storefront and façade standards are presented.

Design Standards
■ Building entries must be recessed at least 12 inches. ■ An awning, canopy, or arcade is required above building entries and ground floor street-facing windows, unless
a tree, pole, or other impediment exists.
■ Storefront doors are to contain a high percentage of
glass (minimum of 50 percent) to encourage pedestrian
window shopping.
■ Ground-floor windows must use clear glass (88 percent light transmission).
■ The portion of ground-floor street-facing façades between 3 feet and 8 feet in height shall be at least 70 percent transparent.

In addition to fabric, awnings or canopies made of quality wood, glass, and/or metal are encouraged.
■ Placement of air conditioning units in individual
windows and window transom areas is prohibited on
ground-floor, street-facing façades.
■ Solid roll-up security features are prohibited on storefronts. If roll-up security features are to be incorporated, they shall be transparent, placed inside the building, and only be utilized after business hours.

Design Guidelines
» A building’s awnings should all have the same color
scheme; awning signs may vary in type, style, and color to differentiate individual businesses within a building.

Storefronts should have recessed entries, permeable
display windows made of clear glass, and awnings over
both.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1009 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-20 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Building Design
Downtown Redding not only serves as the heart of the
community, but also as the strongest visual image of the community. These visual impressions affect the way Redding residents and visitors feel about the City and are often an indication of the community’s economic vitality.

Design Standards
The design standards presented herein are intended to
foster good design in order to create a quality image for Downtown Redding, encourage reinvestment, and improve
the Downtown Redding’s economic vitality in general.

The following design standards are applicable to all new development within the Specific Plan area and are illustrated in Figure 6.3.
■ Articulations such as recesses, reveals, changes in
materials, and canopies/awnings shall be used to avoid
blank walls.
■ New horizontal building additions to existing structures shall match the original structure in terms of scale, roof line, materials, and color.
■ Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened
with a material that matches the architectural style of Design Guidelines
» Avoid blank walls at the ground floor by utilizing
windows, recesses, reveals, changes in materials, and
canopies to create visual interest.
» Additions to existing buildings should be integrated with the existing structure’s window and door styles and
openings.
» Vary rooflines with parapets, cornices, and other
features to create interesting rooflines.
» Introducing or changing the location or size of windows or other openings that disrupt the architectural rhythm, alignment or character of the original building is not
recommended.
» Accentuate doors with decorative details and/or
attractive painted signs.
the building and is integrated into
its design.
■ All utilities, such as backflow
prevention devices, groupings of
meters, etc., shall be located
outside the public right-ofway, within a building
recess, utility room,
or landscaped area,
and be fully screened
from public view. A
combination of elements
can be used to screen utility,
trash, and recycling areas, including
solid masonry walls, berms, and
landscaping.

FIGURE 6.3: BUILDING MASSING

AND ARTICULATION
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1010 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 6-21
Landscaping/Hardscape Design
Landscaping in Downtown Redding should achieve four
specific ends: 1) to beautify Downtown Redding and create a gateway to the city; 2) to soften commercial development; 3) to unify the area as a pleasant environment for residents and visitors alike; and 4) to provide shade for pedestrians, parking, vehicles, and bicycles. These four ends will be accomplished by a recognizable use of repeated planting treatments.

Consistency and continuity within the street right-of-way and building setback areas is extremely important.

New development in Downtown Redding should refer to
the following landscape guidelines, the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, and the Downtown Redding Street Tree
Management Plan.

Design Standards
■ Refer to the Downtown Redding Street Tree
Management Plan when planting and/or removing
trees in the public right-of-way.
■ Trees and Shrubs shall be a minimum of 15-gallon and
5-gallon size, respectively, at the time of planting.
■ All landscaped areas are to be well-maintained and free of weeds and debris; when adjacent to public right-ofway, they shall maintain pedestrian access. ■ Planting shall create and maintain a clear view by keeping low plants to under 3 feet in height, and tree limbs pruned up to no lower than 7 feet in height.
■ Any unutilized areas are to be landscaped in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Chapter 18.47.

Maintained mature street trees provide shade and define the pedestrian path.

Design Guidelines
» Ground-level landscaping and hardscape detailing
should be used at the ground level to soften the
impact of large buildings.
» Use potted plants in quality, appropriately sized
planters, especially for enhancement of sidewalk
shops.
» Vines and climbing plants integrated upon building
and perimeter garden and building walls are
encouraged.
» When effective screening is needed, appropriate
plant materials should be selected to be capable of
growing to the height and density desired within a
reasonable period of time.
» Landscaping material, so long as it is properly
maintained, is the preferred method to obscure the
view of any parking or storage area adjacent from a
public street or pedestrian area.

Building mass is softened with landscaping and trees.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1011 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-22 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Parking, Circulation, and Access
Design Standards
■ New public and commercial parking structures in the
Downtown Core District shall comply with the
applicable use permit conditions of approval which
pertain to design.
■ Parking that is accessory to an on-site use shall comply with all applicable standards of this Plan and with the screening and landscape standards of Zoning Ordinance
Section 18.41.100. The screening and landscape
standards of Zoning Ordinance Section 18.41.100 shall
not apply to parking when it is the primary use of a site. ■ New projects in the Downtown Mixed-Use District shall locate surface parking lots behind buildings. Where the property is a corner lot, the surface parking lot may
occupy no more than 50 percent of the dimension on
the secondary street frontage. See Figure 6.4.
■ Where new projects in the Downtown Mixed Use
District are adjacent to an alley, access to parking shall be from the alley. Where properties do not abut an
alley, access may be from the street but may take up no more than 20 percent of the frontage dimension. See
Figure 6.4.

A parking garage with artistic Art Deco screening
allows passersby to see in.

FIGURE 6.4: PARKING AND ACCESS
Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1012 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-22 Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Design Guidelines
» Common shared-access driveways which provide access
to more than one site are encouraged in order to reduce the number of driveway curb cuts along Downtown
Redding streets.
» Parking areas should be separated from buildings by
either a raised concrete walkway or landscaped strip.

Parking stalls directly abutting buildings are not
desirable.
» Whenever possible, locate parking lot entries on side streets in order to minimize pedestrian/vehicular
conflicts along the primary street. When this is not
possible, design the primary site entry with decorative stamped concrete or pavers to differentiate it from the sidewalk.
» Parking structures should be designed to fit in with the Downtown Redding urban fabric.
» Wrap parking structures with active ground-floor uses, such as retail, office, or residential units or lobbies that mask the ground floor so the structures enhance the
physical atmosphere of Downtown Redding.
» The design of parking structures should permit
maximum opportunities for natural surveillance into
and from the structures.

These parking garages are wrapped with ground-floor
retail spaces; upper floors are articulated with faux
windows in keeping with the design of the building’s facade modulation, or screened with an artistic, permeable
facade. Staircases are designed to be visible from the
street.

Parking lots should be landscaped with clear pedestrian walk ways; shade structures help to designate such areas.

Chapter
6 Packet Pg. 1013 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan 6-22
Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update
Chapter 6
Packet Pg. 1014 Attachment: DTSP_Ch_6 Update Redlined Version (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan RS-3.5
PF
PF

DMUD-SP-BH
PF

DCD-SP-BH
GC
RM-6
OS
GO
GO
PF
GC-VR

DMUD-SP
GC
GC-VR
RM-20

DMUD-SP
HC
GC-VR
RM-9

DMUD-SP-BH
RM-20

DMUD-SP
GO
LO
RM-9
RM-9
LO
PF
GO
GO
NC
RM-9
OS
RM-9
NC
RM-12
RM-18
RM-9
PF
PF
PF
GO-BH

DMUD-SP
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
Dr
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
Ridge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Canal Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Che
stnut St
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

PROPOSED ZONING MAP
P:\Planning\ProProjects\General Location\DowntownSP_Location.aprx OCTOBER 22, 2021
Zoning District
Existing Specific Plan Boundary
Specific Plan Proposed Addition

SACRAMENTO RIVER

ALTERNATIVE

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING
Packet Pg. 1015 Attachment: Proposed Zoning Alternative Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update) Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 1

ADDENDUM TO A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021
General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449
Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450
Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449, Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450, and Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361 associated with the adoption of the proposed Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update (“Plan”).

The Plan was adopted in 2001, amended in 2010 and again in 2018. The vision of the update is to continue to create a revitalized Downtown Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of historical and natural resources, and which has a lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities, inviting to residents and visitors alike. The update would modify the Specific Plan area boundary (see attached Location Map), change the zoning and general plan land use classification of certain properties (see attached Zoning Map and General Plan Map), and would modify the land use regulations, development standards, design standards and guidelines of the Specific Plan.

The adoption of a specific plan is established through the authority granted to the City of Redding by the California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457 (Specific Plans). Specific plans may be adopted by resolution or by ordinance. This allows cities to choose whether their specific plans, or portions thereof, will be policy-oriented or regulatory in nature. The Plan was adopted as a hybrid that included three distinct zoning districts (Central Business District, Uptown Business District, and Southern Gateway District) within a portion of the Plan area and provided the same regulatory structure, such as permitted uses and development standards, as other zoning districts in the City. The regulations of each of these districts were crafted specifically to address development issues within the Plan area. The amendment to the Plan in 2018 simplified the zoning districts into two districts (Core District and Mixed-Use District) to better match the existing and desired development in Downtown and cover the entire Plan area. The proposed update would expand the Mixed-Use District to the east. The goals, strategies, development standards, design guidelines and procedures in the Plan Update provide direction as new development, redevelopment, future planning, and public-improvement efforts occur within the Specific Plan area.

The boundaries of the Plan area are proposed to be expanded to redefine the area considered to be Downtown Redding. This revision would include blocks in the east that are residential and institutional. This area would economically benefit from the expansion. The proposed Plan boundary is generally defined as the area from Riverside Drive and Trinity Street to the north, Packet Pg. 1016 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 2 Court Street to the west, Continental Street and Sequoia Street to the east, and Lincoln Street and Cypress Avenue to the south. The land use pattern south of Shasta Street and north of South Street, between the Union Pacific Railroad tracks and East Street make up the Downtown Core District.

The Downtown Core District boundary represents the densest part of Downtown and aligns with the existing Highrise Building Height Overlay District. The proposed area consisting of institutional uses are within the existing Highrise Building Height Overlay District as well. The remaining expansion area to the east and southeast of the Downtown Core District within the proposed Plan area include less intensive land uses and buildings and are proposed to be within the Downtown Mixed-Use District.

REVISED IMPACT ANALYSIS
Although land use regulations, development standards, entitlement processes, and design standards and guidelines affecting properties with the proposed expansion Plan area would be modified as a result of the Plan Update, the proposal would not allow urban development to occur in any areas where the same or similar types of urban development are not presently permitted.

The expansion to include the public facilities and multiple family areas is an area that was previously excluded. At this time, staff is of the opinion that bringing these areas back into the Specific Plan would bring economic benefit to these properties. The northern portion, north of Placer Street is currently zoned “PF” Public Facilities; building heights to be determined by use permit; or “GO” General Office; building heights allowed up to 50 feet; and contains the “BH” Building Height Overlay District, which allows building heights to exceed the limitations of the base zoning districts by use permit. Bringing this area back into the Specific Plan would place this area in the Midrise Building Height Overlay Districts which allows height up to 75 feet. Overall, the inclusion of this area would not change in height limits already afforded under the current “BH” Building Height Overlay District.

The current zoning along Butte Street, east of Continental Street, is within the “GO” General Office and “GC-VR” General Commercial-Visitor Retail” Zoning Districts. The height limit is 50 feet and 45 feet, respectively. The maximum height limit in the proposed Mixed-Use District is 75 feet, which exceeds the existing respective zoning districts. However, by reducing the height limit to a maximum of 35 feet for developments on properties adjacent to a single-family zoning district, would mitigate the impact to the adjacent single-family neighborhood and would still accommodate for varied pitch roof designs for two-story construction, which is a requirement in the Mixed-Use District.

Adoption of the Plan Update would not negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the Packet Pg. 1017 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 3 proposed Plan and amendments to Title 18 will have a significant effect on the environment.

Furthermore, there is no evidence in light of the whole record that the proposed amendments to the General Plan Diagram will negatively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region. The Plan reflects and implements the numerous General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding as well as the Downtown Focus Area Development Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element. The adoption and implementation of the Plan Update is anticipated to positively impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding area by facilitating the achievement of the Plan's vision to *create a revitalized Downtown Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of historical and natural resources..." by having a lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities, inviting to residents and visitors alike." The Plan is necessary to properly implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The Implementation section of the General Plan identifies the adoption of a Specific Plan and Development Guidelines for Downtown Redding to address the following: Appropriate land use classifications; desired mixed-use concepts; public gathering places; building scale and mass; facade and overhang treatments; Downtown circulation and streetscape; parking and parking structures; and linkage to other districts. The Updated Plan addresses the aforementioned issues relative to current conditions and the community's present long-term vision for Downtown Redding. It is important to assess the adequacy of adopted specific plans from time to time to ensure that they remain effective in implementing General Plan goals and policies and in achieving the community's evolving vision for specific plan areas. The intent of the Plan Update is to improve upon the implementation of the General Plan goals and polices pertaining to Downtown Redding.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65454, the Plan Update is consistent with the General Plan's goals and policies. Appendix A of the Plan Update identifies the goals and policies of the Community Development and Design Element, Transportation Element, Natural Resources Element, Health and Safety Element, Recreation Element, Economic Development Element, Housing Element, Public Facilities and Services Element, and Air Quality Element of the General Plan which pertain to Downtown Redding. For the following reasons, the Plan reflects and implements the numerous General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Downtown Redding as well as the Downtown Focus Area Development Guidelines of the Community Development and Design Element:

Packet Pg. 1018 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 4

6. The Plan directly supports the goal and related policies of the Air Quality Element to reduce motor vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled by allowing for increased mixed-use development and residential densities and supporting a balance between all modes of transportation, including active (non-motorized) transportation modes.

DETERMINATION
The City of Redding previously prepared a Negative Declaration for the Plan, which was adopted on February 6, 2001 and subsequently adopted an Addendum to the Negative Declaration on April 3, 2018. Based upon a review of the proposed amendments to the Plan, it has been determined that an addendum to the previously adopted Negative Declaration is appropriate because none of the following conditions (pursuant to CEQA Section 15162) have occurred:

1. Substantial changes are proposed for the project that will require major revision of the previous Negative Declaration due to new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

Packet Pg. 1019 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Negative Declaration – Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 Page 5

2. New information of substantial importance indicates that:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration.
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Negative Declaration.
c. Mitigation measures previously 'found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt them.
d. Mitigation Measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the project proponents decline to adopt them.

FINDINGS

1. The City of Redding has determined that an addendum is warranted, finding that none of the above conditions are in evidence and that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the proposal will have a significant effect on the environment.

2. The Addendum to the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement and analysis of the City of Redding.

PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Pursuant to Section 15164(c) of CEQA, an addendum does not require circulation for public review.

Copies of the Addendum, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the original Initial Study may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact Lily Toy at (530) 245.7231. ____________________________ ___________________________ Date Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Development Services Department
January 5, 2022
Packet Pg. 1020 Attachment: Addendum to Negative Declaration for Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public MUC
PF-I

3.5 to 6
GC
GC
PF-I-S
PF-I
PK
GO
GO
GC MUC
PF-I
LO
20 to 30
HC
MUC
GO
GWY
6 to 10
20 to 30
6 to 10
6 to 10
PF-I-S
GO
GC
6 to 10
PF-I
GO
LO
NC
NC
6 to 10
PF-I
PK
GWY
GWY
GO
MUC
Court St
Cypress Ave
South St
East St
N Court St
Pine St
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
West St
Willis St
Butte St
Gold St
Yuba St
Railroad Ave
Continental St
Sundial Bridge
D
Traveled Way
Oregon St
Chestnut St
Waldon St
California St
Lincoln St
Verda St
Sequoia St
Garden Ave
Placer St
Placer St
Center St
Tehama St
East St
Cliff
Dr
Eleventh St
Eureka Way
Lee St
idge Dr
Florence St
Terrace St
Auditorium Dr
Lowe St
Ca
n
al Dr
Rose
Av
e
Prince St
A
melia Ct
Civic Center Dr
Gilbert St
Vista Ave
Grace Ave
Division St
Crestview Ave
Sacramento St
Halverson Ct
Butte St
Canal Dr
Shasta St
Yuba St
Center St
Sacramento St
Sonoma St
Butte St
Gold St
Grape
Ave
Trinity St
South St
East St
Riverside Dr
Butte St
Liberty
St
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400 Feet

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF REDDING

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Packet Pg. 1021 Attachment: Proposed General Plan Map (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update)

ADDENDUM TO A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration
For the City of Redding Zoning Map
Rezoning RZ-2021-00450
Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update 2021

SUBJECT
Zoning Map Amendment to expand the Downtown Redding Specific Plan boundary to include the properties east of East Street and along Butte Street to Sequoia Street as depicted as the Specific Plan Proposed Addition area in the attached location map.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Redding Zoning Map was comprehensively updated and adopted on December 17, 2002.

The City now proposes to amend the zoning designation of the subject properties from “GO-BH” General Office-Building Height Overlay District, and “PF-BH” Public Facility-Building Height Overlay District to “DMUD-SP-BH” Downtown Mixed Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District–Building Height Overlay District, and from “GC-VR” General Commercial-Visitor and Retail, “GO” General Office, and “RM-10” Residential Multiple Family-10 units per acre to “DMUD-SP” Downtown Mixed Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The expansion to include the public facilities and multiple family areas was previously excluded.

Bringing these areas back into the Specific Plan would bring economic benefit to these properties.

The northern portion, north of Placer Street is currently zoned “PF” Public Facilities; building heights to be determined by use permit; or “GO” General Office; building heights allowed up to 50 feet; and contains the “BH” Building Height Overlay District, which allows building heights to exceed the limitations of the base zoning districts by use permit. Bringing this area back into the Specific Plan would place this area in the Midrise Building Height Overlay Districts which allows height up to 75 feet. Overall, the inclusion of this area would not change in height limits already afforded under the current “BH” Building Height Overlay District.

Packet Pg. 1022 Attachment: Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration – Zoning Map DTSP Update RZ-2021-00450-DTSP Update Page 2 The inclusion of the Butte Street would bring economic benefit to the already legal nonconforming development along Butte Street. Most of the structures do not meet setback standards leading to limited redevelopment of the area. Further, the “GO” General Office district does not allow for the convenient type uses that would benefit the adjacent Garden Tract neighborhood.

The proposed amendment will reclassify the properties currently designated “GO-BH” General Office-Building Height Overlay District, and “PF-BH” Public Facility-Building Height Overlay District to “DMUD-SP-BH” Downtown Mixed-Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District– Building Height Overlay District, and from “GO” General Office, and “RM-10” Residential Multiple Family-10 units per acre to “DMUD-SP” Downtown Mixed-Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Map are necessary to ensure consistency with the proposed General Plan.

DETERMINATION
On December 17, 2002, the city of Redding adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the update of the City of Redding Zoning Map (Project). Based upon a review of the current amendments to the Zoning Map, it has been determined that an addendum is appropriate because the additions are minor, and none of the following conditions (pursuant to CEQA Section 15162) have occurred:

1. Substantial changes are proposed for the Project that will require major revision of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration due to new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that involve new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

3. New information of substantial importance indicates that:
a. The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration.
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration.
c. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.
d. Mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the Project proponents decline to adopt them.

Packet Pg. 1023 Attachment: Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration – Zoning Map DTSP Update RZ-2021-00450-DTSP Update Page 3

FINDINGS

1. The City of Redding has determined that an addendum is warranted, finding that none of the above conditions are in evidence and that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the amendment proposal will have a significant effect on the environment.

2. The Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding.

3. Pursuant to Section 15074.1(b) of CEQA, the City of Redding finds that the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are sufficient and that the Project will not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.

PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Pursuant to Section 15164(c) of CEQA, an addendum does not require circulation for public review.

Copies of the Addendum, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the original Initial Study may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact Planning Manager Lily Toy at (530) 245.7231.
____________________________ ___________________________ Date Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Development Services Department
LT/et
Attachment: Location Map
January 5, 2022
Packet Pg. 1024 Attachment: Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted for the City of Redding Zoning Map (available online) (6.1--Continued Public

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO REDDING PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommendation
Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion, forward a recommendation to City Council to the adopt the proposed Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update by approving General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449, Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450, and Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361, upon a determination that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adequately complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

Background
The Downtown Redding Specific Plan (Specific Plan) was originally adopted in 2001, amended in 2010 and again in 2018. The latter update involved numerous stakeholders, community workshops, Planning Commission, and City Council meetings that were held in order to present information and preliminary proposals, as well as to solicit input and feedback pertinent to the formulation of the update.

MEETING DATE: October 26, 2021
ITEM NO. 4(b)1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)1--Recommendation to the City Council Regarding General Plan Amendment Application GPA-2021-00449, Rezoning Application RZ-2021-00450, and Specific Plan Amendment Application AMND-2021-00361, initiated by the City of Redding Development Services Department, requesting approval of the following proposal; increasing the size of the Specific Plan area; changing the zoning of certain properties from “GO-BH” General OfficeBuilding Height Overlay District, and “PF-BH” Public Facility-Building Height Overlay District to “DMUD-SP-BH” Downtown Mixed Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District–Building Height Overlay District, and from “GC-VR” General Commercial-Visitor and Retail, “GO” General Office, and “RM-10” Residential Multiple Family-10 units per acre to “DMUD-SP” Downtown Mixed Use District-Specific Plan Overlay District, upon a determination that the Addendum to the Negative Declaration adequately complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The proposal also includes amendments to the land use regulations, development standards, and other various provisions of the Specific Plan.

Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Packet Pg. 1025 Packet Pg. 3 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 2
The vision of the 2018 update was to create a revitalized Downtown Redding that is attractive, safe, economically vibrant, and respectful of historical and natural resources, and have a lively mix of pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented shops, housing, workplaces, parks, and civic facilities inviting to residents and visitors alike. The 2018 update reduced the Specific Plan area boundary, changed the zoning and general plan land use classification of certain properties, and modified the land use regulations, development standards, parking requirements, design standards and guidelines, implementation action plan, and other various provisions of the Specific Plan.

As a result of the 2018 update, Downtown Redding has experienced a tremendous resurgence.

Public and private partnerships have allowed revitalization to take place. The reopening of streets to the core allows access to vehicles, pedestrians and bikers. The physical landscape has also changed to include 200 new residential units, new commercial and retail properties, new parking options, and the renovation of existing buildings. The vision of the 2018 update is being fulfilled.

Implementation of the Specific Plan has been well tested throughout the past three years.

Application of the regulations, standards, and guidelines as well as the streamlining of the development review and entitlement process were realized. During this time, it has been made clear that refinement to the regulations would further the revitalization of Downtown Redding and foster greater economic development and opportunities in the City core.

City staff held two stakeholder’s meetings earlier this year to gather input from interested Downtown stakeholders to ensure desired elements are included in the development of alternatives and proposed changes. Additionally, staff held a neighborhood informational meeting with the Garden Tract Neighborhood on October 19, 2021, to gather further input.

Issues
PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTER 6: REGULATIONS, STANDARDS, AND GUIDELINES ARE SUMMARIZED BELOW:
• Require all new developments including additions to the pre-application process through the Planning Division to assist in identifying any potential matters prior to submitting for building permits.
• Require a discretionary permit for the following uses:
o Mixed-Use Developments consisting of more than four dwelling units in the Core District;
o Multiple-Family Residential uses consisting of more than four dwelling units in the Core District;
o Supportive/Transitional Housing;
o College and Trade Schools including the ground floor in the Core District; o Government Offices in the Mixed-Use District;
o Clinics greater than 5,000 square feet in the Core District; o Religious Facilities greater than 5,000 square feet in the Core District; o R & D Research Facility or Offices more than 5,000 square feet in the Core District;
o Laboratories in the Core District;
o Home Improvement Sales and Services more than 5,000 square feet; o Business Services, including the ground floor;
Packet Pg. 1026 Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 3
o Maintenance and Repair Services including the ground floor in the Core District; and
o Businesses with a primary use consisting of massage services. • Allow for the following uses:
o Condominiums;
o Offices, Medical and Dental less than 2,000 square feet on the ground floor in the Core;
o Clinics less than 5,000 square feet on the ground floor in the Core District; o Community Centers as a primary use including the ground floor in the Core District;
o Religious Facilities including the ground floor;
o Parking Structures, Public and Commercial without a Use Permit in the Core District;
o R & D Research Facility or Offices less than or equal to 5,000 square feet in the Core District and allow in the Mixed-Use District;
o Banks, without Drive-Thru on the ground floor in the Core District; o Automobile Rental Office in the Core District;
o Home Improvement Sales and Services less than or equal to 5,000 square feet – including Plant Nurseries with screened outdoor yards; and o Allow businesses whose primary use consists of tattoo services. • Reduce those uses requiring a Use Permit to the lesser Director Level Site Development Permit.
• Allow for monuments signs in the Mixed-Use District.
• Design standards and review process for fencing in the front of buildings at zero setback.

PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY. The area proposed to be included in the Specific Plan is generally bounded by Shasta Street to the north, Lincoln Street to the south, East Street to the west, and Park Marina Drive to the east. More than half of the proposed area was originally included in the original 2010 Specific Plan and was eliminated in the 2018 update. The concept to reducing the boundary in the 2018 update was to better define the area considered to be Downtown Redding.

Analysis
Many of the proposed changes are a result of the stake holders’ meetings and neighborhood meeting. Although land use regulations, development standards, entitlement processes, and guidelines affecting properties within the proposed expansion area would be modified as a result of the Plan Update, the proposal would not allow urban development to occur in any areas where the same or similar types of urban development are not presently permitted, with the exception of the height in Butte Street corridor.

The expansion to include the public facilities and multiple family areas is an area that was previously excluded. At this time, staff is of the opinion that bringing these areas back into the Specific Plan would bring economic benefit to these properties. The northern portion, north of Packet Pg. 1027 Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 4
Placer Street is currently zoned “PF” Public Facilities; building heights to be determined by use permit; or “GO” General Office; building heights allowed up to 50 feet; and contains the “BH” Building Height Overlay District, which allows building heights to exceed the limitations of the base zoning districts by use permit. Bringing this area back into the Specific Plan would place this area in the Midrise Building Height Overlay Districts which allows height up to 75 feet.

Overall, the inclusion of this area would not change in height limits already afforded under the current “BH” Building Height Overlay District.

The multiple-family zoned areas proposed to be included are predominantly developed with multiple family development and have been developed beyond the allowed base density under the existing “RM-10” Multiple Family Zoning District. The inclusion into the Specific Plan would bring these properties into conformance since the Specific Plan allows up to 30 units per acre.

The inclusion of the Butte Street would bring economic benefit to the already legal nonconforming development along Butte Street. Most of the structures do not meet setbacks which has limited redevelopment of this area. Further, the “GO” General Office district does not allow for the convenient type uses that would benefit the adjacent Garden Tract neighborhood. Further, the inclusion of the Butte Street corridor would connect the Specific Plan to the adjacent Redding Riverfront Specific Plan Area at the SR44 on/off ramp, thereby creating a convergence of two distinct areas at a major juncture.

The current zoning along Butte Street, east of Continental Street, is within the “GO” General Office and “GC-VR” General Commercial-Visitor Retail” Zoning Districts. The height limit is 50 feet and 45 feet, respectively. The maximum height limit in the proposed Mixed-Use District is 75 feet, which exceeds the existing respective zoning districts. Following the input received by the Garden Tract group, regarding their concern on the height of structures and its impact onto a single-family neighborhood, staff is proposing the following alternative for consideration.

ALTERNATIVE – REDUCED HEIGHT. Reduce the height to a maximum of 35 feet for developments on properties adjacent to a single-family zoning district. This would accommodate for varied pitch roof designs for two-story construction, which is a requirement in the Mixed-Use District.

Reducing the restrictions for office uses, banks and other uses on the ground floor in the Core District would allow for a variety of uses that are pedestrian oriented to be more accessible. This was one of the options made available during the 2018 update.

Reducing the uses that currently require a use permit to a Director Level Site Development Permit would further streamline the process which is one of the goals of this update.

There are currently many monument signs in the Specific Plan area, particularly in the MixedUse District. Currently, the plan prohibits monuments signs in the Specific Plan area and thereby, making all the existing signs legal non-conforming, which limits the ability to perform major alterations to these signs. Addressing monument signs in the Mixed-Use District would alleviate the legal non-conforming and allow these signs to be permitted and allow major alterations, including relocation, and major design upgrades. Overall, this would enhance Downtown Redding.

Packet Pg. 1028 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 5
Regarding the fences, the Specific Plan does not address fencing, particularly within the areas in front of buildings. In order to preserve the aesthetics along the street, staff recommends the incorporation of a standard and process to allow for fencing in the front of a building.

Environmental Determination
Staff has determined that the preparation of an Addendum to the Negative Declaration adopted for the Downtown Redding Specific Plan is appropriate under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the proposed update to this plan (see attached Addendum). The preparation of an addendum to a previously adopted environmental document is specifically provided for under CEQA to address minor technical changes to a previously approved project that do not alter the findings and determination of the adopted environmental document.

Public Comment
Staff has received a public comment, attached, requesting the Planning Commission to delay consideration on the proposed amendments to allow the Garden Tract property owners time to understand any impacts the proposal may have onto their neighborhood.

Planning Commission Authority
RMC Section 18.10.030.B.5, authorizes the Planning Commission to make recommendations to the City Council on General Plan amendments; Specific Plans and amendments to Specific Plans; and amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Text or Zoning Map.

Alternatives
The following alternatives are offered for consideration:

1. Recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments and rezoning.

2. Recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments and rezoning including the alternative to reduce the building heights to 35 feet on properties located adjacent to a residential single-family zoning district. (Staff’s Recommendation)

3. Direct staff to modify the proposed amendments prior to consideration by the Council.

Should changes be requested, the Commission should provide clear direction to staff.

Conclusion
The proposed update captures the community’s vision to continue to revitalize Downtown Redding. The vision of the proposed update is to continue to facilitate the realization of the vision of the 2018 Update through the application of appropriate regulations, standards, and guidelines as well as through the streamlining of the development review and entitlement process. Partnerships have continued to be bolster the community’s determinate to revitalize and transform Downtown Redding. With the proposed revisions to the proposed update, attached to this report, and any additional revisions deemed appropriate by the Commission, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the Packet Pg. 1029 Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan Report to Redding Planning Commission October 22, 2021
Re: 4(b)1-Public Hearing Re: AMND-2021-00361/-GPA-2021-00449/RZ-2021- 00450,Downtown Specific Plan Update Page 6
Downtown Redding Specific Plan Update with the inclusion of the 35 feet height limit as discussed above.
c: Downtown Stake Holders
Interested Parties
Attachments
Location Map
Zoning
Proposed Zoning
General Plan
Proposed General Plan
Draft SP Plan Chapter 6 Redlined Version
Addendum to Negative Declaration
Public Comment
Downtown Redding Specific Plan (available online)
Packet Pg. 1030 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10-26-21 (available online) (6.1--Continued Public Hearing re Downtown Redding Specific Plan

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion, adopt Resolution approving the submission of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan (Plan); and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign all necessary documents and forward the Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Fiscal Impact
Amending the Action Plan will provide the ability to allocate the HOME-ARP grant funds to the designated 745 and 785 St. Marks Street Project. The HOME-ARP grant allocation of $1,597,470 consists of $239,620 for administration costs and the balance of $1,357,850 for eligible program costs. The noted funds are grant funds that will not impact the general fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to direct staff not to amend the Action Plan as requested and provide staff an alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
In response to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), the U.S. Congress passed the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act, which was signed into law on March 11, 2021. The ARP Act provides $5 billion to assist individuals or households who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness, as well as other vulnerable populations, by providing housing, rental assistance, supportive services, and non-congregate shelter. The objective is to reduce homelessness and increase housing stability across the country. These grant funds are administered through HUD’s HOME Program. HOME-ARP funds can be used for four eligible activities: Production or Preservation of Affordable Housing, Tenant-Based Rental Assistance, Supportive Services, Homeless MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 6.2
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.2--Public Hearing to consider adopting a Resolution approving submission of the 2021-22 Home Investment Partnership Program – American Rescue Plan Program (HOMEARP) Allocation Plan (Plan).

Steve Bade, Deputy City
Manager
Packet Pg. 1031
Report to Redding City Council February 6, 2022
Re: 6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan Page 2 Prevention Services, and Housing Counseling and the Purchase and Development of NonCongregate Shelter.

In September 2021, the Council approved a Development Agreement between the City of Redding (City) and AccessHome providing a City Loan in an amount not-to-exceed $1,800,000 for the development of up to six housing units at 745 and 785 St. Marks Street (the Project). As proposed, the units will be 3D printed, income-qualifying units available to individuals who are homeless, at-risk of homelessness, or individuals fleeing domestic violence. Within the Development Agreement, HOME-ARP funds in the amount of $1,357,850 have been committed to the Project.

In order to allocate and spend the HOME-ARP funds, the City, as a Participating Jurisdiction, is required to submit an Allocation Plan as a substantial amendment to the FY 2021-22 Annual Action Plan. The proposed Allocation Plan provides information about how the City of Redding provided the opportunity for public participation, received and considered public comments in preparing the plan, evaluated the needs of qualifying populations within its boundaries and assessed any gaps in those needs when planning and proposing this project.

As a part of the Action Plan amendment process, the Council is required to conduct a public hearing regarding the proposed use of funds within the Allocation Plan. HUD has waived its traditional 30-day public comment period and has allowed jurisdictions to utilize no less than a fifteen-day public comment period. The public comment period began on January 14, 2022.

Following the close of the hearing, the Council could adopt the attached resolution approving the submission of the Allocation Plan, thereby amending the 2021-22 Action Plan and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to sign all necessary documents and forward the Allocation Plan to HUD.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current business and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution
Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online)
Packet Pg. 1032
RESOLUTION NO. 2022–___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING TO AMEND THE 2021-22 ONE-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE HOME

INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (HOME) AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO SIGN ALL

THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND SUBMIT THE HOME
ALLOCATION PLAN TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has informed the City of certain amendments to 24 CFR Parts 91, 92, 570, 576, and 968; and WHEREAS, such amendments mandate the development and submission of a Consolidated Plan in order for the City to continue in certain HUD programs; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared a Consolidated Plan, which includes an annual Action Plan, according to HUD specifications as to form and content; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021, the President of the United States signed the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act; and
WHEREAS, the ARP Act allocated Home Investment Partnership Program – American Rescue Plan funding to Participating Jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, following the required notices in accordance with law, the City Council of the City of Redding has held a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the 2021-22 Action Plan by submission of the HOME Allocation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all public comments received during the fifteen-day public comment period authorized by HUD regarding the proposed amendments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. The City Council does hereby accept the amendment to the 2021-22 Action Plan by approving the HOME Allocation Plan; and

2. The City Council does hereby direct the City Manager, or designee, to sign all necessary documents, including certifications, on behalf of the City and to forward the HOME Allocation Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: Resolution (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: Resolution (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan)

CITY OF REDDING
2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan
As an amendment to the City of Redding 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan Prepared by:

Redding Housing Division
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
(530)225-4048 Phone
(530)225-4126 Fax
Allocation Plan Consultation Request: November 18, 2021 - December 2, 2021 Public Comment Period: January 14, 2022 - February 1, 2022 Redding City Council Public Hearing: February 1, 2022
Resolution No. 2022-
Submitted to HUD: TBD
Approved by HUD: TBD
Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 1 HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Template
Guidance
• To receive its HOME-ARP allocation, a PJ must:
o Engage in consultation with at least the required organizations; o Provide for public participation including a 15-day public comment period and one public hearing, at a minimum; and,
o Develop a plan that meets the requirements in the HOME-ARP Notice. • To submit: a PJ must upload a Microsoft Word or PDF version of the plan in IDIS as an attachment next to the “HOME-ARP allocation plan” option on either the AD-26 screen (for PJs whose FY 2021 annual action plan is a Year 2-5 annual action plan) or the AD-25 screen (for PJs whose FY 2021 annual action plan is a Year 1 annual action plan that is part of the 2021 consolidated plan).
• PJs must also submit an SF-424, SF-424B, and SF-424D, and the following certifications as an attachment on either the AD-26 or AD-25 screen, as applicable:
o Affirmatively Further Fair Housing;
o Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act and Anti-displacement and Relocation Assistance Plan;
o Anti-Lobbying;
o Authority of Jurisdiction;
o Section 3; and,
o HOME-ARP specific certification.

Participating Jurisdiction: City of Redding Date: 1/3/2022 Consultation
Before developing its plan, a PJ must consult with the CoC(s) serving the jurisdiction’s geographic area, homeless and domestic violence service providers, veterans’ groups, public housing agencies (PHAs), public agencies that address the needs of the qualifying populations, and public or private organizations that address fair housing, civil rights, and the needs of persons with disabilities, at a minimum. State PJs are not required to consult with every PHA or CoC within the state’s boundaries; however, local PJs must consult with all PHAs (including statewide or regional PHAs) and CoCs serving the jurisdiction.

Summarize the consultation process:

The City of Redding consulted with the NorCal Continuum of Care, a coalition comprised of representatives of organizations from nonprofit homeless providers, government stakeholders, public housing agencies, healthcare providers, law enforcement, educational institutions, and formerly homeless and homeless persons. An email was sent to the members requesting feedback in November, 2021.

Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 2 Physical notices were posted at various locations around the city and nonprofits and local churches were notified by mail in November, 2021.

List the organizations consulted, and summarize the feedback received from these entities.

Agency/Org
Consulted
Type of
Agency/Org
Method of
Consultation Feedback
S.C.O.A.C.H.E Nonprofit Mail None
SEACM Nonprofit Mail None
Northern
Hispanic Latino
Organization
Nonprofit Mail None
Redding
Rancheria
Tribal Office
Nonprofit Mail None
Far Northern
Regional Center
Nonprofit Mail None
Cross Pointe
Community
Church
Church Mail None
Destiny
Fellowship
Church Mail None
Little Country
Church
Church Mail None
If additional space is needed, insert image of table here:

Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 3 Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 4 Public Participation
PJs must provide for and encourage citizen participation in the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan. Before submission of the plan, PJs must provide residents with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed HOME-ARP allocation plan of no less than 15 calendar days. The PJ must follow its adopted requirements for “reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment” for plan amendments in its current citizen participation plan. In addition, PJs must hold at least one public hearing during the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan and prior to submission.

For the purposes of HOME-ARP, PJs are required to make the following information available to the public:
• The amount of HOME-ARP the PJ will receive,
• The range of activities the PJ may undertake.

Describe the public participation process, including information about and the dates of the public comment period and public hearing(s) held during the development of the plan:
• Public comment period: start date - 1/14/2022 end date - 2/1/2022 • Public hearing: 2/1/2022
On April 28, 2021, the City of Redding was notified of the FY2021 allocation for HOME ARP funding in the amount of $1,597,470. On September 7, 2021, a public meeting was held during the City Council meeting to discuss a proposed development project utilizing in part the HOME ARP funding. No public comments were received, and this project was approved at the City Council public meeting. The allocation plan will be presented in a public hearing at the City of Redding City Council meeting on February 1, 2022.

Describe any efforts to broaden public participation:

On November 18, 2021, a public notice was issued seeking public comment about the identification of unmet needs and gaps in housing or service delivery systems in order to properly prioritize the spending of the HOME ARP funds. The end of the public comment period was December 2, 2021. This notice was published in the local paper, mailed and emailed to the above agencies and posted on local bulletin boards.

A PJ must consider any comments or views of residents received in writing, or orally at a public hearing, when preparing the HOME-ARP allocation plan.

Summarize the comments and recommendations received through the public participation process:

Feedback was only received from Shasta Community Health and Shasta County Health and Human Services, both of the CoC, with regard to the unmet needs of this jurisdiction. Concerns were raised about the lack of a low barrier shelter that could be an alternative resource to those Packet Pg. 1039 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 5 who are unable to go to the Mission. Further, it was noted that there is a lack of Permanent Supportive Housing, which current research shows is the most effective method when working with the chronically homeless population. Additional needs identified by these two members included low-income senior housing, ADA low-income housing, subsidized apartment complexes including studio apartments, case management services, resources for people who are at risk of becoming homeless, registered sex offenders, and people with significant criminal backgrounds.

Summarize any comments or recommendations not accepted and state the reasons why:

N/A
Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis
PJs must evaluate the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within its boundaries and assess the unmet needs of those populations. In addition, a PJ must identify any gaps within its current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system. A PJ should use current data, including point in time count, housing inventory count, or other data available through CoCs, and consultations with service providers to quantify the individuals and families in the qualifying populations and their need for additional housing, shelter, or services.

The PJ may use the optional tables provided below and/or attach additional data tables to this template.

Packet Pg. 1040 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 6 Projected Needs (Regional Housing Need Allocation)
Jurisdiction VeryLow Low Moderate AboveModerate Total Shasta County 885 590 635 1,565 3,675
Anderson 54 37 41 109 241
Percentage of Total 22.6% 15.3% 17.0% 45.1% 100.0% 6.6% Redding 502 339 360 893 2,091
Percentage of Total 24.0% 16.1% 17.2% 42.7% 100.0% 56.9% Shasta Lake 56 39 42 101 238
Percentage of Total 23.4% 16.5% 17.7% 42.5% 100.0% 6.5% Unincorporated Shasta
County 273 179 193 460 1,105
Percentage of Total 24.7% 16.2% 17.5% 41.6% 100.0% 30.1% http://www.hcd.ca.gov/communitydevelopment/housingelement/docs/Shasta-CountyRHNA-Final.pdf * For Extremely Low-Income jurisdictions may either use available Census data to calculate the number of projected extremely low-income households (see Overpayment tab), or presume 50 percent of the very low-income households qualify as extremely low-income households.

This table reflects the final Regional Housing Need Allocation by Income Category for each local government in our area including the City of Redding. This table was provided for the development of the City’s Housing Element for housing needs through April 15, 2028.

Packet Pg. 1041 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 7 Describe the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within the PJ’s boundaries:

According to California Housing and Community Development (HCD) Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) data provided to the City for development for the current Housing Element, the City of Redding needs housing for at least 502 very-low income households and 339 low income households.

Characteristics of homeless individuals and families with children, are found in the annual Continuum of Care Point-in-Time (PIT) count, processed by the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) in accordance with HUD standards. 2019 PIT count totals sited 827 individuals in Shasta County to be homeless on January 22, 2019. Data collected represents collective numbers of chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. Current data identifies population characteristics to be primarily households without children. Racial and ethnic demographics, NorCal CoC wide, show that the highest percentage of these households are Caucasian/Non-Hispanic followed second by American Indian/Alaskan Native.

Describe the unmet housing and service needs of qualifying populations, including but not limited to:
• Sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations;
• Those currently housed populations at risk of homelessness; • Other families requiring services or housing assistance or to prevent homelessness; and,
• Those at greatest risk of housing instability or in unstable housing situations:

According to the 2013-2017 ACS, there are 17,331 housing units which are renter-occupied. The rental vacancy rate during the same reporting period was 3.5 per cent. Given the upward market pressure on contract rents in the area due to recent wildfires and loss of housing units in the local area, a high percentage of extremely low-, very low- and low-income renter households are more likely to experience cost burden, overcrowding and substandard housing conditions.

The nature and extent of homelessness for the sheltered and unsheltered varies individually. The nature of homelessness primarily centers on economic challenges, family structure, exposure to domestic violence, or the presence of substance use. Former homelessness lends greatly to the risk of becoming homeless again as NorCal CoC PIT count data finds many sheltered and unsheltered individuals to have been homeless multiple times in a lifetime. The extent of homelessness can also vary greatly depending on the nature and number of housing barriers including: criminal convictions, economic inadequacy, eviction, inability to access utilities, mental illness, substance abuse disorders or the presence of a pet. A growing number of unsheltered homeless individuals in our jurisdiction have a pet dog or multiple dogs.

Very few landlords offering affordable housing will allow a pet, and those that do will require an additional deposit. Pet ownership among the homeless population has drastically changed the nature and extent of homelessness in our jurisdiction. Individuals that may have been previously sheltered and Packet Pg. 1042 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 8 remain homeless declare that they are not willing to separate from their pet. The extent of homelessness can increase greatly when multiple factors are present.

Based on both the number of cost-burdened and severely cost burdened households, as well as the number of substandard and overcrowded units, the number of available housing units do not meet the housing needs of the City’s low-income residents.

Many extremely low-income households seek rental housing and will most likely be facing rents that exceed 30% of their income, overcrowding, or substandard housing conditions.

Identify and consider the current resources available to assist qualifying populations, including congregate and non-congregate shelter units, supportive services, TBRA, and affordable and permanent supportive rental housing:

The City of Redding is a HUD entitlement community and, therefore, receives direct grant allocations from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) program. The City also receives a varying amount of program income revenue generated from its HOME and CDBG loan portfolios. In 2012, the City elected to serve as the Successor Housing Agency (SHA) to the former Redding Redevelopment Agency, which transferred housing assets to the SHA and established the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF). The LMIHAF includes real property assets acquired by the former Redding Redevelopment Agency for low- and moderate- income housing purposes; loan or grant receivables; encumbered funds that are secured by an enforceable obligation; rents and payments from operations; amounts owed to the Low- and Moderate- Income Housing Asset Fund; mixed-used assets; and housing bond proceeds. Locally, the Affordable Housing Loan Fund (AHLF) has been established to further support the development and rehabilitation of affordable housing projects.

In addition, the City of Redding receives funding resources from the reuse accounts established for the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s CalHome Program (CalHome) from 2011 and 2012 funding agreements. Recently, the City of Redding was awarded $3,400,000 in CalHome Disaster Assistance to assist disaster victims with mortgage assistance and owner-occupied rehabilitation projects. The City continues to pursue additional grant funds through the State of California, including CDBG-Disaster Recovery (DR) and CDBG-Mitigation (MIT) opportunities to assist in disaster recovery and resiliency efforts within our community.

Emergency Shelters and Transitional Housing
The Good News Rescue Mission is a 389-bed facility offering services for men, women, and children in need. All free of charge. It is the primary emergency shelter provider in Redding.

During periods of extreme weather, the Mission provides additional cots to accommodate need.

Packet Pg. 1043 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 9 One Safe Place provides legal services, safety, and emotional support to intimate partners, children and seniors affected by domestic violence and sexual assault. Services provided include emergency shelter, crisis counseling, parenting & relationship education, support groups, case management, food & clothing, legal assistance, tribal assistance, emergency financial assistance, prevention education and community outreach.

FAITHWORKS provides transitional housing for homeless families with children. The main goal of our program is to help homeless families become self-sufficient, productive and contributing citizens. Our program consists of 12 units and on average we have 24 adults and 40 children housed here. The family can stay at Francis Court for up to 24 months.

FAITHWORKS provides transitional housing for homeless veterans. The main goal of our program is help homeless veterans become healthy, self-sufficient, productive and contributing citizens. Our program consists of 4 units on average we have 6 veterans housed at a time. The veterans can live at House of Cornelius for up to 24 months.

Identify any gaps within the current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system:

The serious deficit of homes affordable and available to the qualified populations is both the root cause of the problem, as well as a massive hinderance to strategies focused on connecting qualified populations to housing, shelter and services. Feedback received from Shasta Community Health and Shasta County Health and Human Services with regard to the unmet needs of this jurisdiction included concerns about the lack of a low barrier shelter that could be an alternative resource to those who are unable to go to the Mission. Further, it was noted that there is a lack of Permanent Supportive Housing, which current research shows is the most effective method when working with the chronically homeless population. Additional needs identified by these two members included low-income senior housing, ADA low-income housing, subsidized apartment complexes including studio apartments, case management services, resources for people who are at risk of becoming homeless, registered sex offenders, and people with significant criminal backgrounds.

Packet Pg. 1044 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 10 Identify the characteristics of housing associated with instability and an increased risk of homelessness if the PJ will include such conditions in its definition of “other populations” as established in the HOME-ARP Notice:

The City will not further identify “other populations” within the qualifying populations already outlined.

Identify priority needs for qualifying populations:

The priority needs identified through recent HOME ARP consultation, the public needs hearing, and personal consultation remain consistent with what was identified through the community participation process of the City’s Consolidated Planning efforts. That is, there is an overall need for affordable and permanent supportive rental housing, as well as for the continued expansion of case management and housing navigation services.

People without homes need homes. High and escalating housing costs in the City of Redding, combined with the loss of units in the recent local wildfires create harmful instability for the qualified populations. Whatever personal needs or challenges they are facing become exponentially worse on the streets, adding trauma and stress to individuals surviving outside and further overwhelming the systems of programs and providers. Without safe, quality, affordable housing, our qualified populations are unable to thrive.

Explain how the level of need and gaps in its shelter and housing inventory and service delivery systems based on the data presented in the plan were determined:

The gaps in services and program needs to provide affordable rental housing and supportive services were determined using data from multiple sources as well as personal consultation with community providers. The need for affordable rental housing was determined by evaluating data sources and community partner input which supports the need for long-term supportive services or case management to achieve housing stability has been identified as a priority among qualifying populations.

HOME-ARP Activities
Describe the method for soliciting applications for funding and/or selecting developers, service providers, subrecipients and/or contractors and whether the PJ will administer eligible activities directly:

The project selected for the use of HOME ARP funding is a project that was already in the preliminary planning, development and design stage. This project addressed the needs of the targeted populations of HOME ARP, so when the HOME ARP funds became available, this project appeared to be a good match. This project will result in development and construction of up to eight (8) units becoming available for individuals who are homeless, at-risk of homelessness or those who are fleeing domestic violence.

Packet Pg. 1045 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 11 If any portion of the PJ’s HOME-ARP administrative funds were provided to a subrecipient or contractor prior to HUD’s acceptance of the HOME-ARP allocation plan because the subrecipient or contractor is responsible for the administration of the PJ’s entire HOME-ARP grant, identify the subrecipient or contractor and describe its role and responsibilities in administering all of the PJ’s HOME-ARP program:

No portion of the PJ’s HOME-ARP administrative funds will be utilized by any subrecipient or contractor.

PJs must indicate the amount of HOME-ARP funding that is planned for each eligible HOMEARP activity type and demonstrate that any planned funding for nonprofit organization operating assistance, nonprofit capacity building, and administrative costs is within HOME-ARP limits.

The following table may be used to meet this requirement.

Use of HOME-ARP Funding
Funding Amount Percent of the
Grant
Statutory
Limit
Supportive Services $ #
Acquisition and Development of NonCongregate Shelters $ # Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) $ #
Development of Affordable Rental Housing $ 1,357,849.50 Non-Profit Operating $ # # % 5%
Non-Profit Capacity Building $ # # % 5%
Administration and Planning $ 239,620.50 15 % 15%
Total HOME ARP Allocation $ 1,597,470.00
Additional narrative, if applicable:

N/A
Describe how the characteristics of the shelter and housing inventory, service delivery system, and the needs identified in the gap analysis provided a rationale for the plan to fund eligible activities:

As demonstrated by the data herein as well as in innumerable other reports, the shortage of permanent, affordable, and/or supportive housing options in Redding is one of the primary causes of homelessness and the primary impediment to helping individuals and families exit homelessness. Accordingly, the plan to fund eligible activities focuses on the acquisition, construction, preservation, and/or rehabilitation of housing serving the Qualified Populations.

HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals
Estimate the number of affordable rental housing units for qualifying populations that the PJ will produce or support with its HOME-ARP allocation:

The City estimates that a total of 2 city park host units and up to 6 affordable rental units will be added to the current housing inventory using HOME-ARP funds. These units will be available to someone who is homeless, at-risk of homelessness, or individuals fleeing domestic violence.

Packet Pg. 1046 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 12 Describe the specific affordable rental housing production goal that the PJ hopes to achieve and describe how it will address the PJ’s priority needs:

The City of Redding believes funding the projects will increase the overall public benefit by providing additional income-qualifying housing choices within the community, improving the safety and accessibility of parklands, and introducing an innovative new method of construction technology. Should the projects be built according to the anticipated timeline, the City of Redding will have built the first on-site constructed 3D printed home in California.

Preferences
Identify whether the PJ intends to give preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project:
• Preferences cannot violate any applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). • PJs are not required to describe specific projects to which the preferences will apply.

The City will not further identify “other populations” within the qualifying populations already outlined.

If a preference was identified, explain how the use of a preference or method of prioritization will address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or category of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis:

The City will not further identify “other populations” within the qualifying populations already outlined.

If a preference was identified, describe how the PJ will use HOME-ARP funds to address the unmet needs or gaps in benefits and services of the other qualifying populations that are not included in the preference:

The City will not further identify “other populations” within the qualifying populations already outlined.

HOME-ARP Refinancing Guidelines
If the PJ intends to use HOME-ARP funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily rental housing that is being rehabilitated with HOME-ARP funds, the PJ must state its HOMEARP refinancing guidelines in accordance with 24 CFR 92.206(b). The guidelines must describe the conditions under with the PJ will refinance existing debt for a HOME-ARP rental project, including:

Packet Pg. 1047 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan) 13 • Establish a minimum level of rehabilitation per unit or a required ratio between rehabilitation and refinancing to demonstrate that rehabilitation of HOME-ARP rental housing is the primary eligible activity
The City does not intend to use HOME-ARP funds to refinance existing debt secured by affordable rental housing units.
• Require a review of management practices to demonstrate that disinvestment in the property has not occurred; that the long-term needs of the project can be met; and that the feasibility of serving qualified populations for the minimum compliance period can be demonstrated.

The City does not intend to use HOME-ARP funds to refinance existing debt secured by affordable rental housing units.
• State whether the new investment is being made to maintain current affordable units, create additional affordable units, or both.

The City does not intend to use HOME-ARP funds to refinance existing debt secured by affordable rental housing units.
• Specify the required compliance period, whether it is the minimum 15 years or longer.

The City does not intend to use HOME-ARP funds to refinance existing debt secured by affordable rental housing units.
• State that HOME-ARP funds cannot be used to refinance multifamily loans made or insured by any federal program, including CDBG.

The City does not intend to use HOME-ARP funds to refinance existing debt secured by affordable rental housing units.
• Other requirements in the PJ’s guidelines, if applicable:

The City does not intend to use HOME-ARP funds to refinance existing debt secured by affordable rental housing units.

Packet Pg. 1048 Attachment: Draft 2021 HOME-ARP Funding Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing re 2021-22 HOME ARP Plan)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusion, adopt Resolution approving the City’s Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2021−22 to 2026−27.

Fiscal Impact
The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is not binding, nor is it a formal budget document; therefore, it, alone, does not have direct budget implications. However, the CIP functions as a major reference tool to help in future budgeting decisions.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to adopt the CIP as proposed and provide alternative direction to staff. This will render the City out of compliance with California Government Code and may impact the collection and use of certain funds designated for capital improvement projects.

Background/Analysis
Attached for public review and consideration by the Council is the draft CIP for Fiscal Years 2021-22 to 2026-27. The CIP is a multi-year schedule of public improvements planned by the various departments of the City. It provides a general prioritization of capital improvements so that the City and the public will be able to determine with greater certainty when projects might move to construction subject to sufficient revenue collection. The draft CIP is representative of the City’s capital improvement needs based on the existing budget, the General Plan, and the individual department master plans. The CIP has several general benefits and functions that include:
• Providing a comprehensive look at the City’s projected capital and infrastructure plan.

MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 6.3
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.3--Public Hearing to consider Resolution approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Redding (City).

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 1049
Report to Redding City Council February 9, 2022
Re: 6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan Page 2 • Assisting in forecasting workload and aiding in project coordination between departments (e.g., avoids paving a street one year and tearing it up the next year for a waterline).
• Assisting in scheduling improvements that require more than one year to construct. • Helping with long-term financial planning.
• Providing a tool for setting priorities and obtaining citizen participation in determining those priorities.
• Being an essential component in meeting the state legal requirements for public accounting of development impact fee funds.
• Helping to ensure that plans for community facilities are carried out.

On January 11, 2022, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft CIP and acted by adopting a finding of consistency with the General Plan pursuant to Sections 65103(c) and 65401 of the Government Code.

The main term for the draft CIP is for budget years 2021−22 to 2026−27. This includes the current budget year and the five subsequent years. Additional projects are also identified that are either currently unfunded or are scheduled beyond the 2026−27 fiscal year. These additional projects must be funded when needed to provide for anticipated growth based on the City’s General Plan.

The CIP contains projects from eight divisions: Airports, Community Services, Redding Electric Utility, Solid Waste, Storm Drain Utility, Streets, Wastewater Utility, and Water Utility.

Combined, the main term of the CIP contains 143 projects, totaling $424 million. The CIP includes a discussion of current facilities and services, a statement of consistency with the General Plan, and a list of projects with basic descriptions and anticipated funding sources.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality and quantity of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
Resolution
CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online)
Packet Pg. 1050
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ADOPTING THE REDDING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR
2021-22 to 2026-27
WHEREAS, a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) has been prepared which identifies the City’s long-term capital improvement project needs in a comprehensive and consistent format; and WHEREAS, the CIP was prepared in a format and with content that is consistent with the requirements of Government Code Section 66002, which establishes requirements for the preparation of a CIP that includes projects subject to development impact fees; and WHEREAS, the CIP was reviewed by the Redding Planning Commission on January 11, 2022, and was approved as consistent with the General Plan pursuant to Government Code Section 65103c; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to allow opportunity for public comment on the draft CIP; and
WHEREAS, having satisfied the requirements of law governing preparation, content, general plan consistency, and opportunity for public review, the City Council wishes to adopt said CIP to formalize the document so it can become available for consideration in budgeting, land use planning, and accounting, among other benefits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding does hereby approve and adopt the Redding Capital Improvement Plan for 2021-22 to 2026-27 included herewith as Attachment "A."
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, and was adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
___
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 1051 Attachment: Resolution (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT
PLAN | 2021–2026
Packet Pg. 1052 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
2021-22
TO
2026-27
Packet Pg. 1053 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A Introduction ......................................................................................................................... A-1 B General Overview
• Division Descriptions................................................................................................ B-1 • Project Summary...................................................................................................... B-6 • Funding Overview by Division ................................................................................ B-11 • Funding Overview by Source ................................................................................. B-15 C Detailed Program Summary
• Airports..................................................................................................................... C-1 • Community Services ................................................................................................ C-9 • Redding Electric Utility ........................................................................................... C-12 • Redding Fire Department……………………………………………………….…….....C-20 • Solid Waste............................................................................................................ C-24 • Storm Drain Utility ..................................................................................................C-28 • Streets....................................................................................................................C-31 • Wastewater ............................................................................................................ C-41 • Water...................................................................................................................... C-47 • Future/Unfunded Projects....................................................................................... C-54 Packet Pg. 1054 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION A

INTRODUCTION
Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

INTRODUCTION
The City of Redding’s 2021-22 to 2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a five-year outlook on anticipated capital projects in the City of Redding. The City is required by Government Code 66002 to prepare and adopt a CIP. This document is used as a tool to help ensure that the City’s short- and long-term capital investments are made in the context of careful consideration of the City’s needs as well as the resources available to fund the related capital projects.

THE CIP AND GOOD PLANNING
In general, all projects have their roots in the City’s General Plan and in a particular department’s master plan or other long-range planning document. For example, the General Plan includes goals and policies related to the City’s wastewater treatment and collection system while the Wastewater Master Plan incorporates this direction, accounts for expected growth and the condition of the existing infrastructure, anticipates revenue, and identifies resulting infrastructure needs. These needs are then rolled into projects, a project delivery schedule is developed and then the projects summarized in the CIP. Section 65103c of the Government Code requires planning agencies to review the CIP for consistency with the General Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the CIP on January 11, 2022, and found it consistent with the General Plan.

THE CIP AND THE CITY’S 2-YEAR BUDGET AND 10-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN The budgeting for the City’s CIP starts
with the development of the City’s 2-
year budget and 10-year financial
plan. This biennial process
includes a combination of
detailed staff analysis and
broad public involvement. It is
during this process that basic
municipal operational and
specific infrastructure needs
are identified and matched with
revenues generated from
various local, state and federal
funding sources. This CIP is a
projected $424 million plan with
revenue from 33 different
sources that can be grouped
into nine different funding
source categories. A detailed
breakdown of the CIP funding
by funding source can be found
beginning on page B15 while a
summary by funding source
category is provided on the
chart.

PROJECT FUNDING TOTALS
Airport Fund
598,164
Donation
35,000
General Fund
34,060,500
Grant
125,292,376
Impact Fees
36,363,015
Local Streets
and Roads Fund
22,785,165
PFC
4,966,823
Utility Rates
200,697,932
A-1
Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

TEAM EFFORT IN BUILDING THE CIP
The document is prepared by the Engineering Division in the Public Works Department with input from all Departments in the City. As noted above, many other commissions, community groups and partners have ongoing input into the planning and budget documents that are the foundation of the CIP. The plan includes projects from all areas in the City including, but not limited to, projects that improve the City’s streets, sewer facilities, water facilities, storm drain facilities, airports, and park facilities. The major emphasis in this CIP is rehabilitation and replacement of aging infrastructure in the City’s five rate-funded utilities and streets program. This section contains two charts breaking out the CIP by program and each of the programs by their basic funding sources.

Airports
65,484,669.00
Community Services
12,778,542.00
REU
63,590,530.00
RFD
23,060,500.00
Solid Waste
5,585,000.00
Storm Drain
2,445,808.00
Streets
102,179,825.00
Wastewater
86,319,378.00
Water
63,354,723.00

FUNDING TOTALS
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Airports
Community Services
REU
RFD
Solid Waste
Storm Drain
Streets
Wastewater
Water

FUNDING TYPE BY DIVISION
Airport Fund
Donation
General Fund
Grant
Impact Fees
Local Streets and Roads Fund
PFC
Utility Rates
A-2
Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CIP ORGANIZATION
The document includes a general overview followed by detailed program-by-program summaries of the entire plan.

Section B - General Overview
The general overview includes an overview of each City division contributing to the CIP, followed by a division by division summary of all projects with projected project costs (project development plus construction) and anticipated year of construction and concluding with a detailed overview of the various funding sources. The City’s CIP includes 143 projects with a projected funding need of $424 million. The funding for the five-year CIP consists of local, state and federal funding from 33 different funding sources.

Section C - Detailed Program Summaries
The detailed program summary includes an overview of the program including project by project summaries. These summaries include project descriptions, locations, funding sources, and anticipated schedule for when project development and construction funds will be needed.

Funding Legend
ATP – Active Transportation Program
CDBG – Community Development Block Grant
HBP – Local Highway Bridge Program
HSIP – Highway Safety Improvement Program
PFC – Passenger Facility Charge
SRTS – Safe Routes to School
STIP – State Transportation Improvement Program
PFC – Airport Passenger Facility Charge
RRA – City of Redding as Successor Agency for the Redding Redevelopment Agency A-3
Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION B

GENERAL OVERVIEW
Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

AIRPORTS
There are two airports located within Redding. The Redding Municipal Airport, located in the southeast portion of the City, is designated as a certified airport for commercial airline operations.

Benton Airpark, located close to Downtown Redding at Placer Street and Airpark Drive, is a general aviation facility which provides reliever support to the Redding Municipal Airport. Both facilities are owned and operated by the City. The availability of convenient air transportation for residents and businesses is an asset to the community and can be used as a marketing tool in the City's economic development efforts.

The 2010 Airport Master Plans outline future improvements planned for the Redding Municipal Airport and Benton Airpark. In addition to a listing of proposed improvement projects, the Master Plans identify estimated costs and general time frames (short-term, long-term, etc.) for installation of the improvements.

General Plan Consistency: The projects planned for both airports are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the maintenance and enhancement of our airports to provide convenient airport service for the community and strive to minimize any adverse impacts resulting from aircraft operations or airport expansion. Reference: Goals T9, T10, PF14; Policies T9F, T10A, T10C, PF14A, PF14B, and PF14C.

COMMUNITY SERVICES
The Community Services Department oversees all the programming within the park system and the development, expansion, and enhancement of the park, trail, and open-space amenities. Currently, the City of Redding owns and operates a complete range of park and recreation facilities that include 68 park sites on approximately 598 acres of land. The park system includes the smallest of neighborhood parks, large regional parks, state-of-the-art athletic facilities, and special-use facilities, e.g., boat ramps and a dog park. The Department maintains over 39 miles of trails throughout the city. The trail system has been recognized by federal and state agencies as a model. The core of the trail system is the Sacramento River Trail with many connecting trails and public open spaces.

With several large athletic facilities completed in the last decade, including the Big League Dreams Park, the Redding Aquatic Center, and the Redding Soccer Park, resources have been redirected to the development of large neighborhood parks. Currently, the Department has agreements with five subdivision developers to build neighborhood parks concurrent with the houses. Park development fee credits will fund the bulk of the construction.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed park and recreation projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies which promote the improvement of park and recreation facilities Citywide. Reference: Goals R4, R11, R12, PF15; Policies (all policies listed under the noted goals).

PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Department. The Redding Police Department has the primary responsibility of providing police protection and emergency-service response within the City limits. A mutual aid agreement is in effect with agencies on a statewide basis. The Redding Police Department has three main divisions – Administrative Services, Field Operations, and Investigations. Officers are assigned to B-1
Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) seven beats throughout the City and are dispatched to calls via radio and mobile data computer.

There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvements for the Police Department Fire Department. The Redding Fire Department has the primary responsibility of providing fire protection and emergency-service response within the City limits. A mutual aid agreement is in effect with California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF ) during the wildland fire season for wildland and structure fires within a one-mile fringe area surrounding the City. An automatic aid agreement with the Shasta County Fire Department is also in effect for structure fires outside the wildland fire season. Under these agreements, the Redding Fire Department responds within a onemile fringe area surrounding the City and to county islands. Shasta County Fire Department responds to a small geographic area on the east side of the City. The Redding Fire Department has three main divisions: Administration, Operations, and Fire Prevention. It operates from eight stations and a Fire Headquarters at City Hall.

REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY
As a California municipal corporation, the City of Redding owns, operates, and maintains power generation, transmission, and distribution facilities within the City limits. Given the investment in such facilities and a commitment to providing power at the lowest possible rates, it has historically been Redding's policy to be the sole provider of electric service within the City limits. As areas are annexed, City electric service is made available when PG&E facilities can be purchased or when service can be provided through a logical extension of the City's electric distribution system.

Redding Electric Utility (REU) presently provides service to its customers in an area approximately 61 square miles in size, with 71.5 miles of 115-kV transmission lines and 752.1 miles of overhead and underground 12-kV distribution lines. REU is proud of its record over the past year of 99.99 percent electric service reliability (excluding the Carr Fire Damage).

To meet the demands of the changing state regulations due to wildfire and the increase of the distributed energy installations, the Electric Utility must adapt in the following ways. • Harden our existing distribution system as described in the REU Wildfire Mitigation Plan • Increase the operational efficiency of electrical system to quickly identify, track, and restore outages through the Outage Management System and workforce management tools. • Improve Communications Network to provide Operations & Engineering with real-time awareness of customer usage, circuit load, and system voltages to identify system bottlenecks.

To remain competitive following a trend of decreasing load, increasing solar generation, and pressures from the State to acquire more Renewable energy, REU will restructure our energy portfolio as defined in our 2021 Mid-Cycle Integrated Resource Plan Update. In addition to securing various long- and short-term power purchase contracts, the City owns and operates 183 MW of gasfired generation within the City Limits.

General Plan Consistency. The projects planned for the Electric Utility are consistent with the General Plan’s goals, objectives, and policies, which promote programs that provide safe, reliable, and competitively priced electricity for existing and future City electric customers. Reference: REU’s 2021 Strategic Plan, 2019 Integrated Resource Plan, 2019 Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

B-2
Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SOLID WASTE
Solid waste generated in the City is disposed of at Shasta County's Richard W. Curry/West Central Sanitary Landfill. Under existing state permits, the landfill has sufficient capacity to accommodate the disposal of solid waste at least to the year 2030. Expansion of the facility also appears to be plausible at such time as increased capacity is warranted beyond the extent of existing permits.

Although Shasta County owns the Richard W. Curry Landfill, it has contracted with the City of Redding for the operation and management of the facility. This arrangement was formalized in 1988. All residential, commercial, and industrial refuse in Redding is collected by City personnel.

Since 1995, the City has operated its own Solid Waste Transfer Station for the transfer of Citycollected residential, commercial, and industrial refuse and the transfer of self-haul public refuse.

The facility also has the capability of processing materials collected by curbside recycling programs and contains a household hazardous waste drop-off/processing area and a composting area.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed solid waste projects are consistent with the Solid Waste Facility Master Plan and the City’s General Plan goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the efficient collection and disposal of solid waste, while maintaining an adequate waste-disposal capacity. Reference: Goals CDD2 and PF8; Policies CDD2E and PF8A.

STORM DRAINS
The Redding Planning Area contains 15 watershed basins. Public storm-drainage facilities within the City limits are operated and maintained by the City. Surrounding unincorporated areas are the responsibility of the County of Shasta. As new areas are annexed, the City assumes responsibility for stormwater management.

The City currently has a range of public and private storm-drain facilities to provide safe and efficient capture and conveyance of stormwater runoff and minimize the risks of flooding. Storm-drain facilities include more than 200 miles of storm drain pipe, more than 7,000 inlets, 1,300 outfalls and 200 miles of open channel. These systems typically outfall into natural ravines or tributaries and ultimately to the Sacramento River.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed storm-drainage projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote efforts to reduce flooding and to properly manage stormwater runoff from development. Reference: Goals CDD2 and PF9; Policies CDD2E, PF9A, PF9B, and PF9F.

B-3
Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

STREETS
Redding is both defined and constrained by its network of highways, roads, trails, railroads, and transit services that move its residents and goods in, through, and out of the community. The City is responsible for ensuring the construction and maintenance of all public streets, sidewalks, bridges, bikeways, traffic signals, and street signage within the City limits. The City also maintains a variety of Caltrans facilities consistent with the terms of various cooperative agreements. Developers are either partially or totally responsible for new street construction depending on the type and location of the project. The City uses public funds to build or improve major streets when the improvements were not constructed as part of a land development project.

General Plan Consistency: The projects planned for streets are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the development and maintenance of a safe and efficient public-street and bicycle-route system. Reference: Goal T3, T4, T6, T8, PF11, and PF12; Policies T3A, T3D, T4A, T4B, T6D, T6E, T8B, T8C, PF11B, PF11C, PF11D, and PF11E.

BUILDING MAINTENANCE
The Building Maintenance Division is responsible for many internal City functions including the maintenance and repair of the City's facilities such as City Hall, the Corporation Yard and the multiple Redding Fire Stations to name a few. There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvements for the division.

WASTEWATER
The City of Redding is the sole provider of wastewater service within the City limits. The wastewater system has two major service areas, one served by the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant and the other served by the Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant. Facilities include: the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, initially constructed in 1966, which currently has a capacity of

9.4 million gallons per day (mgd); the Stillwater Treatment Plant, put into service in 1992, which has a capacity of 4.0 mgd; and the wastewater collection system, which has approximately 430 miles of sewer mains, 17 lift stations, and over 7,000 manholes. The wastewater system serves nearly all developed property within the City, plus a few small developments in the surrounding unincorporated area. The City provides service to more than 43,000 household equivalents. One household equivalent is the average amount of wastewater produced by an average single-family residence, which is about 240 gallons per day.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed wastewater projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies which support efforts to achieve and maintain an adequate level of service in the City's sewage collection and treatment system as needed to meet existing and future needs. Reference: Goals CDD2 and PF6; Policies CDD2E, PF6A, PF6B, and PF6C.

B-4
Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) WATER
The City provides water for domestic and fire-suppression uses to most of the City and to small portions of the surrounding unincorporated area. The water system is supplied by two treatment plants and well fields. Facilities include: the Foothill Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 28 million gallons per day (mgd); the Buckeye Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 14.0 mgd; the Enterprise and Cascade well systems, which have a capacity of 19.1 mgd; and the City's water distribution system, which has approximately 560 miles of water mains. The water system serves about 83 percent of the current population of Redding and about 1,800 residents in the surrounding unincorporated area. The water utility provides service to approximately 30,000 households.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed water projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which support efforts to maintain an adequate level of service in the City's water treatment and distribution system as needed to meet existing and future needs.

Reference: Goals CDD2 and PF5; Policies CDD2E, PF5A, PF5B, and PF5C.

B-5
Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

PROJECT SUMMARY
Airports
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
A-BEN-21-2 Runway Pavement Preservation 2022-23 $685,000 C-1 A-BEN-22-1 Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction 2024-25 $2,410,000 C-1 A-BEN-22-2 Eastside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction 2023-24 $3,607,000 C-1 A-BEN-23-2 Westside T-Hanger Taxilane Reconstruction 2025-26 $3,500,000 C-2 A-BEN-23-3 Rehab Parallel Taxiway A 2024-25 $530,200 C-2 A-BEN-23-4 Underground Powerline RPZ 2024-25 $115,000 C-2 A-BEN-25-2 Security Fencing - North RPZ 2026-27 $103,501 C-3 A-MUN-19-1 Reconstruct Runway 16 Blast Pad, MAGVAR, and Taxiway H 2022-23 $7,996,746 C-3 A-MUN-21-2 Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road - Phase I 2021-22 $4,278,222 C-3 A-MUN-22-3 Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase I 2022-23 $1,342,000 C-4 A-MUN-22-4 Master Plan Update 2023-24 $1,000,000 C-4
A-MUN-23-2 Runway 16-34 Grading and Runway 34 REIL Modifications 2025-26 $14,525,000 C-4 A-MUN-23-4 Northwest Apron Extension 2024-25 $2,150,000 C-5 A-MUN-23-5 Airport Access Control System 2024-25 $700,000 C-5 A-MUN-23-8 All Weather Perimeter Road 2026-27 $1,100,000 C-5 A-MUN-24-1 Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase II 2024-25 $18,322,000 C-6 A-MUN-24-4 Environmental Assessment 2024-25 $500,000 C-6 A-MUN-24-7 Pavement Preservation 2025-26 $1,120,000 C-6 A-MUN-25-1 Airport Drainage Study 2025-26 $550,000 C-7
A-MUN-25-3 Runway 17-35 Extension 2025-26 $350,000 C-7
A-MUN-26-1 Parallel Runway/Taxiway - Design 2027-28 $500,000 C-7 A-MUN-26-2 Expand Solar Farm - Design 2027-28 $100,000 C-8 $65,484,669
Community Services
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
CS-2005-21 Shastina Ranch Park Development 2022-23 $2,964,390 C-9 CS-2011-01 Salt Creek Heights Park 2021-22 $1,218,940 C-9 CS-2015-01 Henderson Open Space 2021-22 $294,000 C-9
CS-2019-01 California Soccer Park 2021-22 $344,541 C-10 CS-2019-04 Northeast Crossing Trail (NEXT) 2021-22 $992,445 C-10 CS-2021-01 Caldwell Park Improvements 2021-22 $6,386,274 C-10 CS-2021-02 Proposition 68 Funded Park Improvements 2021-22 $577,952 C-11 $12,778,542
B-6
Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

PROJECT SUMMARY
REU
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
REU-2007-03 Electric Utility GIS Mapping (GIS Conversion) Ongoing $544,870 C-12 REU-2011-02 Corporation Yard Expansion 2021-22 $150,000 C-12 REU-2011-07 Asphalt Paving (Plant Resurfacing) 2021-22 $99,170 C-12 REU-2013-03 CT Gas Leak Detection System 2021-22 $90,000 C-13 REU-2015-02 Power Plant Generator Paint 2021-22 $65,380 C-13 REU-2015-12 Electrical Equipment Improvement 2021-22 $125,000 C-13 REU-2017-13 Next Generation Firewalls 2018-19 $70,300 C-14 REU-2017-14 Substation Pole and Radio Replacement 2021-22 $74,020 C-14 REU-2017-15 Redding Power Substation Controls Modernization 2021-22 $138,000 C-14 REU-2017-16 Substation Network Upgrades 2021-22 $24,950 C-15 REU-2018-01 T3000 Upgrades 2021-22 $107,250 C-15
REU-2018-02 Remote Commercial Meter 2021-22 $1,598,530 C-15 REU-2019-02 Unit 5 Breaker Replacement 2021-22 $350,000 C-16 REU-2019-03 Inter-Sub Fiber Project 2021-22 $4,932,690 C-16 REU-2019-04 Power Plant Air Compressor and Dryer 2021-22 $9,290 C-16 REU-2019-06 RPP Security Improvement 2021-22 $70,000 C-17 REU-2019-07 Unit 4 Fire System Upgrade 2021-22 $240,000 C-17 REU-2019-08 GIS Software 2021-22 $313,780 C-17
REU-2019-09 Energy Trading Modernization 2021-22 $149,870 C-18 REU-2021-01 General System Improvements 2021-22 $38,090,060 C-18 REU-2021-02 TO-TOP CIP Security Infrastructure 2021-22 $750,000 C-18 REU-2021-03 SB901 Tech Solutions 2021-22 $7,052,630 C-19 REU-2021-04 Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects 2021-22 $8,544,741 C-19 $63,590,531
RFD
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
RFD-2023-05 Fire Station 5 Upgrades 2023-24 $51,000 C-20 RFD-2023-07 Fire Station 7 Upgrades 2023-24 $44,500 C-20 RFD-2023-08 Fire Station 8 Upgrades 2023-24 $30,000 C-20 RFD-2024-01 Fire Station 1 Build 2024-25 $9,000,000 C-21 RFD-2024-02 SCBA Replacement 2024-25 $800,000 C-21
RFD-2025-02 Fire Station 2 Upgrades 2025-26 $755,000 C-21 RFD-2025-03 Fire Station 3 Rebuild 2025-26 $5,000,000 C-22 RFD-2025-04 Fire Station 4 Upgrades 2025-26 $690,000 C-22 RFD-2025-06 Fire Station 6 Upgrages 2025-26 $690,000 C-22 RFD-2026-09 Fire Station 9 Build 2026-27 $6,000,000 C-23 $23,060,500
B-7
Packet Pg. 1066 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

PROJECT SUMMARY
Solid Waste
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
SW-4941-01 Transfer Station Tipping Floor 2021-22 $1,250,000 C-24 SW-4941-02 Transfer Facility Resurface Asphalt Ongoing $775,000 C-24 SW-4941-03 Slurry Seal 2022-23 $115,000 C-24
SW-4941-06 Crane Repairs 2022-23 $165,000 C-25
SW-4941-08 Lift Station Retrofit 2021-22 $723,000 C-25
SW-4941-09 Organics Recycling Pilot Program 2021-22 $250,000 C-25 SW-4941-10 Metal Shop Canopy 2021-22 $176,000 C-26
SW-4941-11 Remote Scale 2021-22 $106,000 C-26
SW-4941-12 Administrative Office Remodel 2021-22 $225,000 C-26 SW-4941-13 Materials Recovery Facility Expansion 2022-23 $1,800,000 C-27 $5,585,000
Storm Drain
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
SD-3515-09 Concrete Channel at Linden 2024-25 $350,000 C-28 SD-3515-15 Critical Pipe Lining 2021-22 $300,000 C-28
SD-3525-08 Hollow Lane 2020-21 $460,000 C-28
SD-3560-03 Cypress Box Culvert 2022-23 $460,000 C-29
SD-4439-03 Hawthorne/Canby 2026-27 $300,000 C-29
SD-4439-05 Crossfire and Tarmac 2024-25 $300,000 C-29
SD-4937-01 Master Plan Update Ongoing $275,808 C-30
$2,445,808
B-8
Packet Pg. 1067 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

PROJECT SUMMARY
Streets
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
ST-3520-01 Small Projects Ongoing $1,200,000 C-31
ST-3520-01-4 Traffic Calming Ongoing $240,000 C-31
ST-3572-03 Bridge Maintenance 2021-22 $170,000 C-31
ST-3580-01 Pavement Maintenance Ongoing $18,000,000 C-32 ST-4226-02-2 Placer Street Improvements - Airpark to Pleasant 2026-27 $2,570,000 C-32 ST-4226-08 Canby Road Widening 2021-22 $300,000 C-32
ST-4226-09 Churn Creek/Rancho/Victor Roundabout 2024-25 $4,650,000 C-33 ST-4226-10 Traffic Signal Modification 2021-22 $180,140 C-33 ST-4226-11 S Bonnyview/I-5 Interchange 2021-22 $8,250,000 C-33 ST-4407-01 Sidewalk Replacement Ongoing $1,160,000 C-34 ST-4638-15 ADA Curb Ramps Ongoing $450,000 C-34
ST-4775-05 Turtle Bay to Downtown 2025-26 $6,770,000 C-34 ST-4775-08 Victor & Cypress ATP (VCAT) 2024-25 $10,226,100 C-35 ST-4775-10 Bechelli Lane Improvements 2021-22 $7,935,065 C-35 ST-4775-11 West Street Improvements 2021-22 $2,596,000 C-36 ST-4775-12 Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements 2021-22 $1,273,200 C-36 ST-4783-08 Shasta Street Railroad Crossing Improvements 2021-22 $300,000 C-36 ST-4803-01 Airport Corridor Phase II 2021-22 $1,100,000 C-37 ST-4908-04 Old Alturas Road Bridge over Churn Creek 2021-22 $2,500,000 C-37 ST-4908-05 Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek 2021-22 $4,213,253 C-37 ST-4908-06 Eastside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow 2021-22 $2,411,152 C-38 ST-4908-07 Girvan Road Bridge over Olney Creek 2022-23 $3,128,187 C-38 ST-4908-08 Westside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow 2021-22 $2,751,756 C-38 ST-4908-09 Canyon Road Bridge over ACID Canal 2021-22 $2,364,056 C-39 ST-4908-10 Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek 2021-22 $3,895,961 C-39 ST-4956-04 Old Oregon Trail Widening 2021-22 $2,764,955 C-39 ST-NRTBD-01 Oasis Road Specific Plan Update 2026-27 $50,000 C-40 ST-SBP-01 Stillwater Business Park - Phase II 2021-22 $11,000,000 C-40 $102,449,825
B-9
Packet Pg. 1068 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

PROJECT SUMMARY
Wastewater
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
WW-3512-01 Infiltration and Inflow Control Ongoing $7,500,000 C-41 WW-3525-01 Lift Station Improvements Ongoing $2,073,000 C-41 WW-3525-04 Locust Lift Station 2021-22 $1,755,350 C-41
WW-4086-02 Westside Interceptor - Phase III 2022-23 $7,294,244 C-42 WW-4203-02 Repair/Replace Sewer Lines Ongoing $20,931,430 C-42 WW-4703-01 Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Ongoing $3,968,410 C-42 WW-4801-05 Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Ongoing $2,645,680 C-43 WW-4801-10 Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase II 2022-23 $21,000,000 C-43 WW-LS-CC-04 North Market Lift Station 2023-24 $580,685 C-43 WW-P-CC-01 Lake Redding Interceptor I 2024-25 $5,252,460 C-44 WW-P-CC-28 Woodacre Drive 2021-22 $512,394 C-44
WW-P-CC-4 Buenaventura Sewer 2024-25 $5,134,310 C-44
WW-P-CC-5 Mercury Drive 2023-24 $662,600 C-45
WW-P-CC-8-9 Sulphur Creek 2023-24 $2,931,430 C-45
WW-P-S-01 Oasis Road 2023-24 $414,290 C-45
WW-TP-C-3 Clear Creek Pond Upgrades 2025-26 $3,413,095 C-46 WW-TP-C-4 Organics Receiving 2021-23 $250,000 C-46
$86,319,378
Water
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
W-3020-01-02 Pump Station Improvements Ongoing $1,543,756 C-47 W-3020-04 Pump House 1 Replacement Environmental 2024-25 $1,500,000 C-47 W-4286-01 Replace Water Mains Ongoing $27,821,460 C-47
W-4286-19 Lake Boulevard 24" - Keswick to Northpoint 2021-22 $3,000,000 C-48 W-4338-02-03 Well Rehabilitation Ongoing $861,358 C-48
W-4338-04 Well Head Treatment System Ongoing $2,873,000 C-48 W-4338-05 Install Oxidation/Filtration at EW-14 2024-25 $4,035,690 C-49 W-4338-06 Rehab EW-11 or Construct New Well 2023-24 $2,119,328 C-49 W-4492-01 Foothill Water Treatment Plant Maintenance Ongoing $5,706,838 C-49 W-4600-02 Cypress Avenue Booster Pump Station 2021-22 $2,460,840 C-51 W-4606-01 Buckeye Water Treatment Plant Maintenance Ongoing $1,087,011 C-50 W-4795-03 Hill 900 Reservoir 2023-24 $3,211,740 C-50
W-4795-04-05 Reservoir Improvements Ongoing $2,075,000 C-51 W-CONV-01 Beltline 20" - Oasis to Mountain Lakes 2022-23 $548,548 C-51 W-CONV-02 Oasis 20" - UPRR to Beltline 2022-23 $1,026,635 C-51 W-CONV-03 Oasis 20" - Calexico to A6-V1 2022-23 $807,862 C-52 W-CONV-09 Lake Boulevard 20" - Northpoint to Masonic 2021-22 $427,552 C-52 W-CONV-10 18" Masonic to Hilltop 2021-22 $2,248,105 C-52 $63,354,723
B-10
Packet Pg. 1069 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUNDING OVERVIEW BY DIVISION
Airports
Potential Funding Sources 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Airport Fund $0 $50,435 $202,411 $163,625 $176,743 $4,950 $598,164 Federal FAA Grant $1,826,954 $11,818,075 $5,216,040 $22,320,802 $17,896,380 $624,960 $59,703,211 PFC $40,792 $831,447 $196,140 $2,023,698 $1,545,770 $56,040 $4,693,887 State Aviation Grant $0 $41,265 $165,609 $133,875 $144,608 $4,050 $489,407 $1,867,746 $12,741,222 $5,780,200 $24,642,000 $19,763,501 $690,000 $65,484,669 Total Community Services
Potential Funding Sources 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Local Donations $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
McConnell Foundation Grant $344,541 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $344,541 Park Development Fees $1,228,940 $1,700,000 $434,390 $500,000 $320,000 $0 $4,183,330 Proposition 68 $327,952 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $577,952
REU GHG Non-motorized Tran $125,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 State Park Grant $2,559,000 $3,944,445 $950,274 $0 $0 $0 $7,453,719 Wastewater Rates $12,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000
$4,632,433 $5,941,445 $1,384,664 $500,000 $320,000 $0 $12,778,542 Total B-11
Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUNDING OVERVIEW BY DIVISION
REU
Potential Funding Sources 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Electric Rates $22,506,838 $7,694,378 $9,634,325 $9,347,330 $7,128,830 $7,128,830 $63,440,531 Electric System Financing $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $22,656,838 $7,694,378 $9,634,325 $9,347,330 $7,128,830 $7,128,830 $63,590,531 Total RFD
Potential Funding Sources 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total General Fund $0 $0 $1,025,500 $9,400,000 $7,235,000 $5,400,000 $23,060,500 $0 $0 $1,025,500 $9,400,000 $7,235,000 $5,400,000 $23,060,500 Total Solid Waste
Potential Funding Sources 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Solid Waste Rates/Fees $2,230,000 $2,035,000 $250,000 $0 $795,000 $275,000 $5,585,000 $2,230,000 $2,035,000 $250,000 $0 $795,000 $275,000 $5,585,000 Total Storm Drain
Potential Funding Sources 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Storm Drain Connection Fees $125,808 $150,000 $0 $300,000 $70,000 $580,000 $1,225,808 Storm Drain Rates $120,000 $800,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,220,000 $245,808 $950,000 $300,000 $300,000 $70,000 $580,000 $2,445,808 Total B-12
Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUNDING OVERVIEW BY DIVISION
Streets
Potential Funding Sources 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Dana Drive Impact Fees $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Developer Contribution $30,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,140
Federal ATP Grant $8,888,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,888,000
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Federal Grant $1,178,000 $270,000 $0 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $9,270,000 Federal HBP Grant $7,447,685 $11,859,038 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,306,723 Federal HSIP Grant $1,760,159 $2,001,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,761,759 General Fund $4,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 Impact Fees $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Local Streets and Roads Fund $3,194,065 $2,210,100 $1,270,000 $1,621,000 $1,290,000 $1,470,000 $11,055,165 North Redding Traffic Benefit
District Fees
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
REU GHG Non-motorized Tran $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 State ATP Grant $1,170,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000 $0 $6,770,000 State CPUC Grant $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
State Grant $8,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,250,000
Traffic Impact Fees $2,007,076 $1,560,962 $4,350,000 $200,000 $400,000 $2,350,000 $10,868,038 $40,500,125 $27,226,700 $7,695,000 $11,718,000 $9,365,000 $5,945,000 $102,449,825 Total Wastewater
Potential Funding Sources 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Wastewater Connection Fees $1,088,000 $8,304,073 $3,069,088 $1,841,350 $1,926,050 $1,427,224 $17,655,785 Wastewater Rates $11,230,839 $13,588,157 $5,507,358 $15,834,618 $10,729,300 $11,773,321 $68,663,593 $12,318,839 $21,892,230 $8,576,446 $17,675,968 $12,655,350 $13,200,545 $86,319,378 Total B-13
Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUNDING OVERVIEW BY DIVISION
Water
Potential Funding Sources 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Water Connection Fees $600,000 $69,476 $1,230,438 $0 $0 $0 $1,899,914 Water Rates $17,907,670 $12,059,666 $8,542,524 $9,261,060 $6,006,806 $7,677,083 $61,454,809 $18,507,670 $12,129,142 $9,772,962 $9,261,060 $6,006,806 $7,677,083 $63,354,723 Total The above is an overview of potential funding sources for projects contained in the main term of the Capital Improvement Plan and each project is subject to Redding City Council budgetary approval.

Note:

B-14
Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUNDING OVERVIEW BY SOURCE
Airport Fund
Funding Source 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Airport Fund $0 $50,435 $202,411 $163,625 $176,743 $4,950 $598,164 $0 $50,435 $202,411 $163,625 $176,743 $4,950 $598,164 Total Donation
Funding Source 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Local Donations $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
$35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 Total
General Fund
Funding Source 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total General Fund $4,000,000 $7,000,000 $1,025,500 $9,400,000 $7,235,000 $5,400,000 $34,060,500 Park Development Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,000,000 $7,000,000 $1,025,500 $9,400,000 $7,235,000 $5,400,000 $34,060,500 Total B-15
Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUNDING OVERVIEW BY SOURCE
Grant
Funding Source 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Federal ATP Grant $8,888,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,888,000
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Federal FAA Grant $1,826,954 $11,545,139 $5,216,040 $22,320,802 $17,896,380 $624,960 $59,430,275 Federal Grant $1,178,000 $270,000 $0 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $9,270,000 Federal HBP Grant $7,447,685 $11,859,038 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,306,723 Federal HSIP Grant $1,760,159 $2,001,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,761,759 McConnell Foundation Grant $344,541 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $344,541 Proposition 68 $327,952 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $577,952
State ATP Grant $1,170,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000 $0 $6,770,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $41,265 $165,609 $133,875 $144,608 $4,050 $489,407 State CPUC Grant $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
State Grant $8,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,250,000
State Park Grant $2,559,000 $3,944,445 $950,274 $0 $0 $0 $7,453,719 $34,127,291 $29,986,487 $6,406,923 $30,351,677 $23,715,988 $704,010 $125,292,376 Total Impact Fees
Funding Source 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Dana Drive Impact Fees $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Developer Contribution $30,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,140
Impact Fees $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
North Redding Traffic Benefit District
Fees
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Park Development Fees $1,228,940 $1,700,000 $434,390 $500,000 $320,000 $0 $4,183,330 Storm Drain Connection Fees $125,808 $150,000 $0 $300,000 $70,000 $580,000 $1,225,808 Traffic Impact Fees $2,007,076 $1,560,962 $4,350,000 $200,000 $400,000 $2,350,000 $10,868,038 Wastewater Connection Fees $1,088,000 $8,304,073 $3,069,088 $1,841,350 $1,926,050 $1,427,224 $17,655,785 Water Connection Fees $600,000 $69,476 $1,230,438 $0 $0 $0 $1,899,914 $5,279,964 $12,034,511 $9,083,916 $2,841,350 $2,716,050 $4,407,224 $36,363,015 Total Local Streets and Roads Fund
Funding Source 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Local Streets and Roads Fund $3,194,065 $2,210,100 $1,270,000 $1,621,000 $1,290,000 $1,470,000 $11,055,165 SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 $5,194,065 $4,210,100 $3,270,000 $3,621,000 $3,290,000 $3,470,000 $23,055,165 Total B-16
Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUNDING OVERVIEW BY SOURCE
PFC
Funding Source 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Federal FAA Grant $0 $272,936 $0 $0 $0 $0 $272,936
PFC $40,792 $831,447 $196,140 $2,023,698 $1,545,770 $56,040 $4,693,887 $40,792 $1,104,383 $196,140 $2,023,698 $1,545,770 $56,040 $4,966,823 Total Utility Rates
Funding Source 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Electric Rates $22,506,838 $7,694,378 $9,634,325 $9,347,330 $7,128,830 $7,128,830 $63,440,531 Electric System Financing $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 REU GHG Non-motorized Tran $125,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Solid Waste Rates/Fees $2,230,000 $2,035,000 $250,000 $0 $795,000 $275,000 $5,585,000 Storm Drain Rates $120,000 $800,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,220,000 Wastewater Rates $11,242,839 $13,590,157 $5,507,358 $15,834,618 $10,729,300 $11,773,321 $68,677,593 Water Rates $17,907,670 $12,059,666 $8,542,524 $9,261,060 $6,006,806 $7,677,083 $61,454,809 $54,282,347 $36,224,201 $24,234,207 $34,443,008 $24,659,936 $26,854,234 $200,697,933 Total The above is an overview of potential funding sources for projects contained in the main term of the Capital Improvement Plan and each project is subject to Redding City Council budgetary approval.

Note:
$102,959,459 $90,610,117 $44,419,097 $82,844,358 $63,339,487 $40,896,458 $425,068,976 Total B-17
Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION C

DETAILED PROGRAM

SUMMARIES
Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Runway Pavement Preservation
Description: Slurry seal to seal and maintain runway and replace runway markings.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2600 Gold Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$685,000
$685,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-21-2
Airport Fund $0 $33,550 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,550
Federal FAA Grant $75,000 $549,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $624,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $27,450 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,450
Total $75,000 $610,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $685,000
$75,000 $75,000
$75,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $610,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $610,000
$610,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $685,000
Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction
Description: To replace pavement rated as poor by the Airport Pavement Management Plan.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2600 Gold Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$2,410,000
$2,410,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-22-1
Airport Fund $0 $0 $17,050 $115,500 $0 $0 $132,550
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $279,000 $1,890,000 $0 $0 $2,169,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $13,950 $94,500 $0 $0 $108,450 Total $0 $0 $310,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $2,410,000
$0 $310,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $310,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $2,100,000
$0 $310,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $2,410,000
Eastside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction
This project includes the reconstruction of 16,000 square yards of taxilanes on the eastside of Benton Airpark. These taxilanes are deteriorated and are needed to access City-owned t-hangars.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2600 Gold Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$3,607,000
$3,607,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-22-2
Airport Fund $0 $16,885 $181,500 $0 $0 $0 $198,385
Federal FAA Grant $0 $276,300 $2,970,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,246,300 State Aviation Grant $0 $13,815 $148,500 $0 $0 $0 $162,315 Total $0 $307,000 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,607,000
$0 $307,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$307,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,300,000
$307,000 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,607,000
C-1
Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Westside T-Hanger Taxilane Reconstruction
Description: To replace pavement rated as poor by the Airport Pavement Management Plan.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2600 Gold Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$3,500,000
$3,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-23-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $16,500 $176,000 $0 $192,500
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $270,000 $2,880,000 $0 $3,150,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $13,500 $144,000 $0 $157,500 Total $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $3,200,000 $0 $3,500,000
$0 $300,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 $0 $3,200,000
$0 $0 $300,000 $3,200,000 $0 $3,500,000
Rehab Parallel Taxiway A
Description: The eastside taxiway at Benton Airpark is in need of rehabilitation.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2600 Gold Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$530,200
$530,200
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-23-3
Airport Fund $0 $0 $3,036 $26,125 $0 $0 $29,161
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $49,680 $427,500 $0 $0 $477,180 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $2,484 $21,375 $0 $0 $23,859 Total $0 $0 $55,200 $475,000 $0 $0 $530,200
$0 $55,200
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $55,200 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $0 $475,000
$0 $55,200 $475,000 $0 $0 $530,200
Underground Powerline RPZ
Description: Installing underground powerline under runway protection zone.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2600 Gold Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$115,000
$115,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-23-4
Airport Fund $0 $0 $825 $5,500 $0 $0 $6,325
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $13,500 $90,000 $0 $0 $103,500
State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $675 $4,500 $0 $0 $5,175
Total $0 $0 $15,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $115,000
$0 $15,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
$0 $15,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $115,000
C-2
Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Security Fencing - North RPZ
Description: Installing security fencing around North Runway Protection Zone Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2600 Gold Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$103,501
$103,501
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-25-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $743 $4,950 $5,693
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,150 $81,000 $93,150
State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $608 $4,050 $4,658
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,501 $90,000 $103,501
$0 $13,501
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $13,501 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $90,000
$0 $0 $0 $13,501 $90,000 $103,501
Reconstruct Runway 16 Blast Pad, MAGVAR, and Taxiway H
To replace failing pavement and to rehabilitate Runway 16-34. To include remarking runway number with 17-35 for magnetic variation.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$300,939
$7,996,746
$8,297,685
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-19-1
Federal FAA Grant $395,954 $6,853,896 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,249,850 PFC $40,792 $706,104 $0 $0 $0 $0 $746,896
Total $436,746 $7,560,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,996,746
$436,746 $436,746
$436,746
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $7,560,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,560,000
$7,560,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,996,746
Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road - Phase I To replace failed pavement on Woodrum Circle, airport entrance to Airport Road, Municipal Boulevard, Flight Avenue, and road to FedEx and Civil Air Patrol.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$708,765
$4,278,222
$4,986,987
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-21-2
Federal FAA Grant $1,356,000 $2,649,286 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,005,286 Federal FAA Grant $0 $272,936 $0 $0 $0 $0 $272,936
Total $1,356,000 $2,922,222 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,278,222
$0 $0
$1,356,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,356,000 $2,922,222 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,278,222
$2,922,222 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,278,222
C-3
Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase I
Description: Design phase for project including 4-inch mill and overlay, blast pad reconstruction and initial electrical.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$10,776
$1,342,000
$1,352,776
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $1,216,657 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,216,657
PFC $0 $125,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,343
Total $0 $1,342,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,342,000
$0 $1,342,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$1,342,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,342,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,342,000
Master Plan Update
Airport Layout Plan Update & Narrative Report, inlcuding an Airport Pavement Management System [APMS], a Terminal Expansion Study, an Airport Drainage Study, an Airfield Layout Analysis, a Wildlife Hazard Assessment [WHA], and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan [WHMP].

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $906,600 $0 $0 $0 $906,600
PFC $0 $0 $93,400 $0 $0 $0 $93,400
Total $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
$0 $1,000,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Runway 16-34 Grading and Runway 34 REIL Modifications
Design and Construction for Runway 16-34 RSA Grading, Shoulder, and Drainage Improvements, Runway 34 REIL Modifications, and Electrical Improvements.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$14,525,000
$14,525,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-2
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $793,275 $0 $12,375,090 $0 $13,168,365 PFC $0 $0 $81,725 $0 $1,274,910 $0 $1,356,635
Total $0 $0 $875,000 $0 $13,650,000 $0 $14,525,000
$0 $875,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $875,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $13,650,000 $0 $13,650,000
$0 $875,000 $0 $13,650,000 $0 $14,525,000
C-4
Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Northwest Apron Extension
Description: Extension of Apron for transient parking and added relief for fire fighting operations as needed.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$2,150,000
$2,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $135,990 $1,813,200 $0 $0 $1,949,190 PFC $0 $0 $14,010 $186,800 $0 $0 $200,810
Total $0 $0 $150,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,150,000
$0 $150,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000
$0 $150,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,150,000
Airport Access Control System
Description: Brand new system installed for performing necessary badging procedures as required by TSA.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$700,000
$700,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-5
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $67,995 $566,625 $0 $0 $634,620 PFC $0 $0 $7,005 $58,375 $0 $0 $65,380
Total $0 $0 $75,000 $625,000 $0 $0 $700,000
$0 $75,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $625,000 $0 $625,000
$0 $75,000 $0 $625,000 $0 $700,000
All Weather Perimeter Road
Design and Construction for perimeter road needed for vehicles transitioning from N to S side of airfield. Necessary to prevent FOD and to be undistributed after hazardous weather conditions.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$1,100,000
$1,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-8
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $90,660 $906,600 $0 $997,260 PFC $0 $0 $0 $9,340 $93,400 $0 $102,740
Total $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $1,100,000
$0 $100,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000
$0 $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $1,100,000
C-5
Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase II
Description: Construction phase for project including 4-inch mill and overlay, blast pad reconstruction and initial electrical.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$18,322,000
$18,322,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $16,610,725 $0 $0 $16,610,725 PFC $0 $0 $0 $1,711,275 $0 $0 $1,711,275
Total $0 $0 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $18,322,000
$0 $0
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $18,322,000
$0 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $18,322,000
Environmental Assessment
Description: Parallel Runway 4,000 x 47 feet with a visual approach.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $453,300 $0 $0 $453,300
PFC $0 $0 $0 $46,700 $0 $0 $46,700
Total $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
$0 $500,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Pavement Preservation
Description: Design and Construction for pavement preservation project.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$1,120,000
$1,120,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-7
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $108,792 $906,600 $0 $1,015,392 PFC $0 $0 $0 $11,208 $93,400 $0 $104,608
Total $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $1,000,000 $0 $1,120,000
$0 $120,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $120,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000
$0 $0 $120,000 $1,000,000 $0 $1,120,000
C-6
Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Airport Drainage Study
Comprehensive analysis of airport outfall system including runway safety areas to verify proper drainage on the airfield.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$550,000
$550,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-25-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $498,630 $0 $498,630
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,370 $0 $51,370
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 $550,000
$0 $550,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 $550,000
Runway 17-35 Extension
Description: Environmental Assessment and Design for Runway Extension, including Parallel Taxiway and Connectors.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$350,000
$350,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-25-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $317,310 $0 $317,310
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,690 $0 $32,690
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $350,000
$0 $350,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $350,000
Parallel Runway/Taxiway - Design
Description: Parallel Runway/Taxiway includes New Electrical Vault (Design) - 4,000 x 47 feet with a visual approach.

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $453,300 $453,300
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,700 $46,700
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
$0 $500,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
C-7
Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Expand Solar Farm - Design
Plan to expand solar farm that currently exists at the airport to reduce carbon foot print and energy costs with expansion of airport and future development.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$100,000
$100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-2
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,660 $90,660
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,340 $9,340
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
$0 $100,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
C-8
Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Shastina Ranch Park Development
Construct 7-acre park site on dedicated land in the SE quadrant located in a soon-to-be developed subdivision.

Includes a multi-purpose playing field, playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, and trail connections to adjacent public open-space areas.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
SE Quadrant, Rancho Road/Shasta View Drive
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$2,964,390
$2,964,390
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2005-21
Park Development Fees $10,000 $1,700,000 $434,390 $500,000 $320,000 $0 $2,964,390 Total $10,000 $1,700,000 $434,390 $500,000 $320,000 $0 $2,964,390 $10,000 $205,000
$10,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$195,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,505,000 $434,390 $500,000 $320,000 $0 $2,759,390
$1,700,000 $434,390 $500,000 $320,000 $0 $2,964,390
Salt Creek Heights Park
Design and construction of 8-acre park site on dedicated land in the SE quadrant located in a soon-to-be-developed subdivision. The project will include a multi-purpose playing field, playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, trail connections, and a restroom.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
SW Quadrant, off Eureka Way
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$408,660
$1,218,940
$1,627,600
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2011-01
Park Development Fees $1,218,940 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,218,940 Total $1,218,940 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,218,940
$90,000 $90,000
$1,218,940
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,128,940 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,128,940
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,218,940
Henderson Open Space
Description: Grant funded project for kayak launch improvements, trail construction and restoration of native plants and parking lot.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
SE Quadrant
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$482,000
$294,000
$776,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2015-01
Local Donations $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
State Park Grant $259,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $259,000
Total $294,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $294,000
$40,000 $40,000
$294,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$254,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $254,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $294,000
C-9
Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
California Soccer Park
Replace four synthetic turf fields at the existing athletic facility and install additional shade structures. The artificial turf and the underlying drainage system installed during the Park's construction were defective.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
NE Quadrant
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Park Improvement
$4,805,459
$344,541
$5,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2019-01
McConnell Foundation Grant $344,541 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $344,541 Park Development Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Park Development Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $344,541 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $344,541
$0 $0
$344,541
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$344,541 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $344,541
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $344,541
Northeast Crossing Trail (NEXT)
Create 2,900 feet of bicycle path linking to existing non-motorized trails and the City's commercial core. Includes the installation of bridge crossing over Boulder Creek and LED lighting along the trail, planting of 60 trees and temporary irrigation.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
NE Quadrant
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$272,775
$992,445
$1,265,220
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2019-04
Local Donations $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
REU GHG Non-motorized Tran $125,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 State Park Grant $700,000 $108,445 $0 $0 $0 $0 $808,445 Wastewater Rates $12,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000
Total $837,000 $155,445 $0 $0 $0 $0 $992,445
$272,000 $272,000
$837,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$565,000 $155,445 $0 $0 $0 $0 $720,445
$155,445 $0 $0 $0 $0 $992,445
Caldwell Park Improvements
A grant funded expansion and improvement of Caldwell Park, featuring a new bike park, expanded skate park, lighting, and parking. Project also includes a new restroom, exercise equipment, shade structures and public art.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
NW Quadrant
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$349,726
$6,386,274
$6,736,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2021-01
State Park Grant $1,600,000 $3,836,000 $950,274 $0 $0 $0 $6,386,274 Total $1,600,000 $3,836,000 $950,274 $0 $0 $0 $6,386,274 $200,000 $250,000
$1,600,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,400,000 $3,786,000 $950,274 $0 $0 $0 $6,136,274
$3,836,000 $950,274 $0 $0 $0 $6,386,274
C-10
Packet Pg. 1087 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Proposition 68 Funded Park Improvements
The Per Capita program funding various playground replacement and park development projects. Locations include Kum Bay Xerel Open Space, Creekside Park, Peppertree Park, Ravenwood Park and Indian Hills Park.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
NW, SW & NE Quadrants
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$577,952
$577,952
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2021-02
Proposition 68 $327,952 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $577,952
Total $327,952 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $577,952
$27,952 $27,952
$327,952
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$300,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000
$250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $577,952
C-11
Packet Pg. 1088 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Electric Utility GIS Mapping (GIS Conversion)
Converting REU’s existing linear based drawing data into an information-based system, including acquiring necessary data platforms and the conversion of the existing data into GIS.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,214,241
$544,870
$1,759,111
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2007-03
Electric Rates $544,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $544,870
Total $544,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $544,870
Corporation Yard Expansion
Required to construct a distribution dispatch center for both organizational efficiencies and as mandated by FERC and NERC regulatory requirements.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
20055 Viking Way
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Expansion
$101,505
$150,000
$251,505
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2011-02
Electric System Financing $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Total $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Asphalt Paving (Plant Resurfacing)
Addition of concrete or asphalt surfaces to areas of the plant enhances plant safety, cleanliness, and ease of operation.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$50,831
$99,170
$150,001
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2011-07
Electric Rates $99,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,170
Total $99,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,170
C-12
Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
CT Gas Leak Detection System
Description: Gas leak equipment installation for each of the CT's.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$90,000
$90,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2013-03
Electric Rates $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000
Total $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000
Power Plant Generator Paint
Description: Repainting Peaking Units 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$184,604
$65,380
$249,984
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2015-02
Electric Rates $65,380 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,380
Total $65,380 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,380
Electrical Equipment Improvement
Modification of high incident energy levels areas to reduce the incident energy to levels that could allow work to be performed while energized.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$125,000
$125,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2015-12
Electric Rates $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000
Total $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000
C-13
Packet Pg. 1090 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Next Generation Firewalls
Purchase and install next generation firewalls at power control center and Avtech to segment the operational network data from business data.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road/3611 Avtech Parkway
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$49,696
$70,300
$119,996
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-13
Electric Rates $70,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,300
Total $70,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,300
Substation Pole and Radio Replacement
Purchase and installation of new 107 foot direct burial poles, radios, and antennas at the Oregon, Waldon, Sulphur Creek, and College View Substations to replace the existing least circuits and improve radio path reliability.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Multiple Substations
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$47,159
$74,020
$121,179
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-14
Electric Rates $74,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,020
Total $74,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,020
Redding Power Substation Controls Modernization
The controls for this substation are part of a System wide substation control modernization project. Replacement of SCADA equipment manufactured by C3-Ilex and control panels that utilize obsolete mechanical protective relays.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Multiple Substations
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$138,000
$138,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-15
Electric Rates $138,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,000
Total $138,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,000
C-14
Packet Pg. 1091 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Substation Network Upgrades
Annual update to lifecycle operational computers and network equipment. Substations currently need upgrades to Subnet Solutions computers running Windows XP to eliminate the security risks.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Multiple Substations
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$10,051
$24,950
$35,001
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-16
Electric Rates $24,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,950
Total $24,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,950
T3000 Upgrades
Software updgrades to the T3000 system, an SEI distributed controls system (DCS) software and hardware product, to operate and monitor the Redding Power Plant generating units.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$317,745
$107,250
$424,995
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2018-01
Electric Rates $107,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $107,250
Total $107,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $107,250
Remote Commercial Meter
Installation of 1700 electric revenue meters to increase the number of system data points feeding into the Outage Management System and Distribution Management System providing the SO's critical information, improving outage response and restoration time.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$7,934
$1,598,530
$1,606,464
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2018-02
Electric Rates $1,598,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,598,530
Total $1,598,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,598,530
C-15
Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Unit 5 Breaker Replacement
Description: Replace generator breaker with better system.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$350,000
$350,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-02
Electric Rates $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Total $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Inter-Sub Fiber Project
Description: Installing fiber from Redding Power to Moore Rd, Moore Rd to Waldon, and Waldon to Oregon.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Multiple Substations
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$167,320
$4,932,690
$5,100,010
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-03
Electric Rates $1,732,690 $0 $1,500,000 $1,700,000 $0 $0 $4,932,690 Total $1,732,690 $0 $1,500,000 $1,700,000 $0 $0 $4,932,690 Power Plant Air Compressor and Dryer
Description: Replacment of two plant air compressors.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$170,708
$9,290
$179,998
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-04
Electric Rates $9,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,290
Total $9,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,290
C-16
Packet Pg. 1093 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
RPP Security Improvement
Modificaiton of front gate to incorporate an entrance and exit gate, relocation of guard shack to the center of the driveway with a new floor plan, and add Cardlock type locks to buildings in the plant site that hold controls or other sensitive equipment.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$70,000
$70,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-06
Electric Rates $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Total $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Unit 4 Fire System Upgrade
Description: Creating working space after removal of steam boilers.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$240,000
$240,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-07
Electric Rates $240,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,000
Total $240,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,000
GIS Software
Description: Project to allow for a GIS software application upgrade and development of new distribution utility network.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
3611 Avtech Parkway
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$11,224
$313,780
$325,004
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-08
Electric Rates $313,780 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $313,780
Total $313,780 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $313,780
C-17
Packet Pg. 1094 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Energy Trading Modernization
Description: Ongoing internal costs to maintain software requested for energy trading modernization project.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,120,133
$149,870
$1,270,003
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-09
Electric Rates $149,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $149,870
Total $149,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $149,870
General System Improvements
General system improvements including the installation of transformers, capacitor banks, poles, overhead and underground conductors and switches, splices/connectors, conduit, splice boxes and vaults.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
REU-2021-01
Electric Rates $7,640,060 $5,850,000 $6,050,000 $6,050,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $38,090,060 Total $7,640,060 $5,850,000 $6,050,000 $6,050,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $38,090,060 TO-TOP CIP Security Infrastructure
CIP Security Equipment including Physical Access, Cyber-Servers, and Building Upgrades to PCC and Backup PCC Facility.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
3611 Avtech Parkway
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$750,000
$750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2021-02
Electric Rates $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000
Total $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000
C-18
Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
SB901 Tech Solutions
Technology implementation to minimize sources of ignition, manage vegetation within the City’s electric grid, harden systems, more effectively protect and notify the public if an issue arises, as well as shorten response and recovery time.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
3611 Avtech Parkway
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$4,153,241
$7,052,630
$11,205,871
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2021-03
Electric Rates $7,052,630 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,052,630
Total $7,052,630 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,052,630
Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects
Description: Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
REU-2021-04
Electric Rates $1,261,048 $1,844,378 $2,084,325 $1,597,330 $878,830 $878,830 $8,544,741 Total $1,261,048 $1,844,378 $2,084,325 $1,597,330 $878,830 $878,830 $8,544,741 C-19
Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 5 Upgrades
Upgrades to Fire Station #5, including exterior paint, PPE containment, generator relocation and the remodel of the Battalion Chief Quarters.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
955 Hartnell Ave
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$51,000
$51,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2023-05
General Fund $0 $0 $51,000 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
Total $0 $0 $51,000 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
$0 $0
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $51,000 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
$0 $51,000 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
Fire Station 7 Upgrades
Description: Upgrades to Fire Station #7, including exterior paint, PPE containment, new counter tops and water filtration system.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
3772 Flight Ave
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$44,500
$44,500
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2023-07
General Fund $0 $0 $44,500 $0 $0 $0 $44,500
Total $0 $0 $44,500 $0 $0 $0 $44,500
$0 $0
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $44,500 $0 $0 $0 $44,500
$0 $44,500 $0 $0 $0 $44,500
Fire Station 8 Upgrades
Description: Upgrades to Fire Station #8, including exterior paint and PPE containment Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
131 Churn Creek Rd
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$30,000
$30,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2023-08
General Fund $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Total $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
$0 $0
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
$0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
C-20
Packet Pg. 1097 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 1 Build
Description: New build of 12,000 sq. ft. Fire Station.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
1335 Shasta St
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Build
$0
$9,000,000
$9,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2024-01
General Fund $0 $0 $900,000 $8,100,000 $0 $0 $9,000,000 Total $0 $0 $900,000 $8,100,000 $0 $0 $9,000,000
$0 $900,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $900,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $8,100,000 $0 $0 $8,100,000
$0 $900,000 $8,100,000 $0 $0 $9,000,000
SCBA Replacement
Description: New self contained breathing apparatus units for fire stations.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
All Fire Stations
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$800,000
$800,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2024-02
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $800,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $800,000
$0 $0
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Fire Station 2 Upgrades
Description: Remodel and expansion of Fire Station #2, including adding 2,000 square feet, exterior paint and a generator.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
3491 Placer St
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$755,000
$755,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-02
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $755,000 $0 $755,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $755,000 $0 $755,000
$0 $75,500
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $75,500 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $679,500 $0 $679,500
$0 $0 $0 $755,000 $0 $755,000
C-21
Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 3 Rebuild
Description: Rebuild of Fire Station #3.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
4255 Westside Rd
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-03
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $4,500,000 $0 $5,000,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $4,500,000 $0 $5,000,000
$0 $500,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $4,500,000 $0 $4,500,000
$0 $0 $500,000 $4,500,000 $0 $5,000,000
Fire Station 4 Upgrades
Description: Remodel and 2,000 sq. ft expansion of Fire Station #4.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2605 S Bonnyview Rd
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$690,000
$690,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-04
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $690,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $690,000
$0 $69,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $69,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $621,000 $0 $621,000
$0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $690,000
Fire Station 6 Upgrages
Description: Remodel and 2,000 sq. ft expansion of Fire Station #6.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
1695 Beltline Rd
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$690,000
$690,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-06
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $690,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $690,000
$0 $69,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $69,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $621,000 $0 $621,000
$0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $690,000
C-22
Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 9 Build
Description: Build new Fire Station on East side.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
East Side
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Build
$0
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2026-09
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $5,400,000 $6,000,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $5,400,000 $6,000,000
$0 $600,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,400,000 $5,400,000
$0 $0 $0 $600,000 $5,400,000 $6,000,000
C-23
Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Transfer Station Tipping Floor
The tipping floor is subject to use by heavy equipment and garbage trucks and wears down over time, requiring periodic resurfacing.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-01
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 $0 $1,250,000 Total $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 $0 $1,250,000
$60,000 $125,000
$600,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $65,000 $0
$540,000 $0 $0 $0 $585,000 $0 $1,125,000
$0 $0 $0 $650,000 $0 $1,250,000
Transfer Facility Resurface Asphalt
The asphalt within the facility is over 18 years old and failing due to aging and daily use by heavy equipment and trucks.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-02
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $250,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $275,000 $775,000 Total $250,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $275,000 $775,000
$25,000 $77,500
$250,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $25,000 $0 $0 $27,500
$225,000 $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $247,500 $697,500
$0 $250,000 $0 $0 $275,000 $775,000
Slurry Seal
Description: Slurry seal to seal and maintain the driveways within the Transfer and Recycling Facility.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-03
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $115,000 Total $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $115,000
$0 $11,500
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$5,500 $0 $0 $6,000 $0
$0 $49,500 $0 $0 $54,000 $0 $103,500
$55,000 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $115,000
C-24
Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Crane Repairs
The crane is used to adjust loads in the transfer trailers prior to hauling to the landfill. Crane repairs cover the cost of replacing parts approximately every 5 years.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-06
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $85,000 $0 $165,000 Total $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $85,000 $0 $165,000
$0 $24,750
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$12,000 $0 $0 $12,750 $0
$0 $68,000 $0 $0 $72,250 $0 $140,250
$80,000 $0 $0 $85,000 $0 $165,000
Lift Station Retrofit
Description: To increase stormwater handling capacity.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$77,000
$723,000
$800,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-08
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $723,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $723,000 Total $723,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $723,000
$170,000 $170,000
$723,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$553,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $553,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $723,000
Organics Recycling Pilot Program
Description: Pilot program consisting of de-bagger and grinder to prepare material to inter the Wastewater System.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$250,000
$250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-09
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Total $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
$50,000 $50,000
$250,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
C-25
Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Metal Shop Canopy
Construction of a structure modification over the welding shop to prevent water from entering the shop, creating a hazard.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$74,000
$176,000
$250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-10
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $176,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $176,000 Total $176,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $176,000
$50,000 $50,000
$176,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$126,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $126,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $176,000
Remote Scale
Description: Remote unattended scale for City vehicle use to reduce wait time and improve efficiency.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$106,000
$106,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-11
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $106,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,000 Total $106,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,000
$21,200 $21,200
$106,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$84,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $84,800
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,000
Administrative Office Remodel
Description: Remodel administrative building to create additional workspace for growing staff.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$225,000
$225,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-12
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $125,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 Total $125,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
$25,000 $45,000
$125,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$100,000 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
C-26
Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Materials Recovery Facility Expansion
Description: Replacement of sorting screens to update machine and improve processing capacity.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$1,800,000
$1,800,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-13
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 Total $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000
$0 $300,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
$1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000
C-27
Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
Concrete Channel at Linden
Description: Install concrete box culvert or open channel similar to downstream portion.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Linden Avenue from S. Market to Favretto
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$350,000
$350,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-3515-09
Storm Drain Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $280,000 $350,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $280,000 $350,000
$0 $70,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $280,000
$0 $0 $0 $70,000 $280,000 $350,000
Critical Pipe Lining
Description: Critical pipe lining at various locations throughout the City.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$300,000
$300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-3515-15
Storm Drain Rates $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Total $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
$0 $45,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $255,000 $0 $0 $0 $255,000
$0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Hollow Lane
Description: Remove existing undersized pipes and replace with arch culvert.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Hollow Lane
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$52,853
$460,000
$512,853
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-3525-08
Storm Drain Rates $60,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $460,000 Total $60,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $460,000
$60,000 $60,000
$60,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
$400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $460,000
C-28
Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
Cypress Box Culvert
Description: Remove and replace existing box culvert.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
E Cypress
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$460,000
$460,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-3560-03
Storm Drain Rates $60,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $460,000 Total $60,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $460,000
$60,000 $60,000
$60,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
$400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $460,000
Hawthorne/Canby
Description: Install new storm drain system in area with existing roadside swales and ditches.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Hawthorne and Canby
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$300,000
$300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-4439-03
Storm Drain Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000
$0 $45,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $255,000 $255,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000
Crossfire and Tarmac
Description: Install new storm drain system in area with existing roadside swales.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Crossfire and Tarmac
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$300,000
$300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-4439-05
Storm Drain Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
$0 $45,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $255,000 $0 $0 $255,000
$0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
C-29
Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
Master Plan Update
Description: Development of a new Master Plan to address the current regulatory environment and needs of the utility.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$14,192
$275,808
$290,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-4937-01
Storm Drain Connection Fees $125,808 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,808 Total $125,808 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,808
$125,808 $275,808
$125,808
Project Development
Construction
Total
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,808
C-30
Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Small Projects
Various traffic operation and capacity improvements. Funds will be used as match for grant-funded projects or leverage for development projects.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Various
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-3520-01
Traffic Impact Fees $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 $50,000 $300,000
$200,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Traffic Calming
Description: Install devices to reduce speeds and cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Various
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-3520-01-4
Local Streets and Roads Fund $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $240,000 Total $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $240,000 $6,000 $36,000
$40,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000
$34,000 $34,000 $34,000 $34,000 $34,000 $34,000 $204,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $240,000
Bridge Maintenance
Description: Maintenance of structures including bridge rail and painting and small repairs Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Various
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-3572-03
Federal HBP Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Local Streets and Roads Fund $25,000 $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $170,000 Total $25,000 $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $170,000 $0 $0
$25,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$25,000 $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $170,000 $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $170,000
C-31
Packet Pg. 1108 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Pavement Maintenance
Description: Roadway surface maintenance work conducted annually on various streets.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-3580-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 Total $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $18,000,000 $300,000 $1,800,000
$3,000,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000
$2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $16,200,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $18,000,000 Placer Street Improvements - Airpark to Pleasant
Widen, AC overlay and restripe Placer Street to provide ultimate width for all modes of transportation including nonmotorized improvements and lighting from Pleasant Street to Olive Avenue.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Placer Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening/Extension
$0
$2,570,000
$2,570,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-02-2
Local Streets and Roads Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $200,000 $220,000 Traffic Impact Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $2,150,000 $2,350,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,000 $2,350,000 $2,570,000
$0 $220,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $220,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,350,000 $2,350,000
$0 $0 $0 $220,000 $2,350,000 $2,570,000
Canby Road Widening
Description: Widen Canby Road north of Browning along the west side. Includes curb, gutter, and sidewalk.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Canby Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$21,656
$300,000
$321,656
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-08
Dana Drive Impact Fees $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Total $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
$0 $0
$50,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
$250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
C-32
Packet Pg. 1109 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Churn Creek/Rancho/Victor Roundabout
Description: Construct roundabout at convergence of Churn Creek Road with both Victor Avenue and Rancho Road.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Churn Creek/Ranch/Victor Intersection
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$4,650,000
$4,650,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-09
Traffic Impact Fees $400,000 $100,000 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,650,000 Total $400,000 $100,000 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,650,000
$400,000 $650,000
$400,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$100,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000
$100,000 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,650,000
Traffic Signal Modification
Description: Modification of traffic signal at various corners to support widening.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Buenaventura Blvd at Sunset Avenue
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$180,140
$180,140
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-10
Developer Contribution $30,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,140
Impact Fees $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Total $180,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,140
$27,020 $27,020
$180,140
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$153,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $153,120
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,140
S Bonnyview/I-5 Interchange
Project to improve South Bonnyview corridor between Bechelli and Churn Creek including intersections, ramps, and interchange. Needed to accommodate growth and will be a TIF credit/reimbursement agreement.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
S Bonnyview I5 NB Ramp
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$8,250,000
$8,250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-11
State Grant $8,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,250,000
Total $8,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,250,000
$1,250,000 $1,250,000
$8,250,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,250,000
C-33
Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Sidewalk Replacement
Description: Annual project to replace worn and/or damaged sections of existing sidewalks.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-4407-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $180,000 $180,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,160,000 Total $180,000 $180,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,160,000 $27,000 $174,000
$180,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$27,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
$153,000 $153,000 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $986,000 $180,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,160,000 ADA Curb Ramps
Description: Install ADA-accessible curb ramps at various intersections throughout the city.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Various
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Widening/Extension
ST-4638-15
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Total $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 $15,000 $90,000
$75,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
$60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $360,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000
Turtle Bay to Downtown
Turtle Bay to Downtown Multi-use trail connecting Dana to Downtown and Turtle Bay boat ramp to Continental.

Includes a tunnel; shared use path; and pedestrian safety lighting.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
North of (parallel to) SR44
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening
$0
$6,770,000
$6,770,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-05
State ATP Grant $1,170,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000 $0 $6,770,000 Total $1,170,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000 $0 $6,770,000
$1,170,000 $1,170,000
$1,170,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000 $0 $5,600,000
$0 $0 $0 $5,600,000 $0 $6,770,000
C-34
Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Victor & Cypress ATP (VCAT)
The project will complete sidewalk gaps, install ADA ramps, narrow travel lanes to provide standard bike lanes, and add street lighting along Churn Creek Road and Maraglia Street. An enhanced crosswalk will also be installed on Churn Creek Road with a refuge island and rectangular rapid flashing beacons.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Churn Creek Rd. between Hartnell and Cypress and
Maraglia St. between Churn Creek and Hilltop.

Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$84,206
$10,226,100
$10,310,306
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-08
Federal Grant $1,178,000 $270,000 $0 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $9,270,000 Local Streets and Roads Fund $590,000 $15,100 $0 $351,000 $0 $0 $956,100 Total $1,768,000 $285,100 $0 $8,173,000 $0 $0 $10,226,100 $1,768,000 $2,053,100
$1,768,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$285,100 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $8,173,000 $0 $0 $8,173,000
$285,100 $0 $8,173,000 $0 $0 $10,226,100
Bechelli Lane Improvements
Construct buffered bike lanes, separated bike lanes, sidewalks, accessible driveways, curb ramps, enhanced crossings with rapid flashing beacons, and refuge islands.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Bechelli Ln. from S. Bonnyview to Cypress Ave. and
Loma Vista from Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd.

Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$637,034
$7,935,065
$8,572,099
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-10
Federal ATP Grant $6,740,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,740,000
Local Streets and Roads Fund $761,065 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $761,065 REU GHG Non-motorized Tran $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Traffic Impact Fees $434,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $434,000
Total $7,935,065 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,935,065
$761,065 $761,065
$7,935,065
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$7,174,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,174,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,935,065
C-35
Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
West Street Improvements
Description: Fill sidewalk gaps, enhance crossings with rapid flash beacons, curb extensions, refuge islands, and bike facilities.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
West Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$593,000
$2,596,000
$3,189,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-11
Federal ATP Grant $2,148,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,148,000
Local Streets and Roads Fund $448,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $448,000 Total $2,596,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,596,000
$0 $0
$2,596,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,596,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,596,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,596,000
Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
Competitive grant-funded projects to improve safety along street right-of-way. Contingent upon grant approval from various programs.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Various
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$1,273,200
$1,273,200
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-12
Federal HSIP Grant $1,273,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,273,200 Total $1,273,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,273,200
$276,000 $276,000
$1,273,200
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$997,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $997,200
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,273,200
Shasta Street Railroad Crossing Improvements
Description: Install pedestrian crossing improvements on north side of railroad crossing.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Shasta Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$111,551
$300,000
$411,551
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4783-08
State CPUC Grant $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Total $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
$0 $0
$300,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
C-36
Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Airport Corridor Phase II
Description: Widen Airport Road for additional capacity and operational safety.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Airport Road Corridor
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening/Extension
$0
$1,100,000
$1,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4803-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $150,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 Total $150,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000
$150,000 $300,000
$150,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000
$950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000
Old Alturas Road Bridge over Churn Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Old Alturas Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$877,118
$2,500,000
$3,377,118
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-04
Federal HBP Grant $0 $2,213,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,213,250
Traffic Impact Fees $0 $286,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $286,750
Total $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
$0 $0
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
$2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Sacramento Drive over Olney Creek.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Sacramento Drive
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$739,331
$4,213,253
$4,952,584
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-05
Federal HBP Grant $370,253 $3,843,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,213,253 Total $370,253 $3,843,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,213,253
$370,253 $370,253
$370,253
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $3,843,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,843,000
$3,843,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,213,253
C-37
Packet Pg. 1114 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Eastside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow
Description: Replace the bridge on Eastside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Eastside Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$202,048
$2,411,152
$2,613,200
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-06
Federal HBP Grant $196,494 $1,938,099 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,134,593 Traffic Impact Fees $25,458 $251,101 $0 $0 $0 $0 $276,559 Total $221,952 $2,189,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,411,152
$221,952 $221,952
$221,952
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,189,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,189,200
$2,189,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,411,152
Girvan Road Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Girvan Road over Olney Creek.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Girvan Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$220,852
$3,128,187
$3,349,039
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-07
Federal HBP Grant $639,195 $2,129,147 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,768,342 Traffic Impact Fees $83,992 $275,853 $0 $0 $0 $0 $359,845 Total $723,187 $2,405,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,128,187
$723,187 $723,187
$723,187
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,405,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,405,000
$2,405,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,128,187
Westside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow
Description: Replace the bridge on Railroad Avenue over Canyon Hollow Creek Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Westside Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$204,644
$2,751,756
$2,956,400
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-08
Federal HBP Grant $2,436,130 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,436,130
Traffic Impact Fees $315,626 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,626
Total $2,751,756 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,751,756
$219,356 $219,356
$219,356
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,532,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,532,400
$2,532,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,751,756
C-38
Packet Pg. 1115 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Canyon Road Bridge over ACID Canal
Description: Replace the bridge on Canyon Road over the ACID Canal.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Canyon Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$178,283
$2,364,056
$2,542,339
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-09
Federal HBP Grant $356,519 $1,735,542 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,092,061 Traffic Impact Fees $47,137 $224,858 $0 $0 $0 $0 $271,995 Total $403,656 $1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,364,056
$403,656 $403,656
$403,656
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,960,400
$1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,364,056
Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Eastside Road over Olney Creek.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Eastside Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$481,029
$3,895,961
$4,376,990
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-10
Federal HBP Grant $3,449,094 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,449,094
Traffic Impact Fees $446,867 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $446,867
Total $3,895,961 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,895,961
$145,961 $145,961
$3,895,961
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,750,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,895,961
Old Oregon Trail Widening
Description: Widen and realign Old Oregon Trail from Paso Robles to Bear Mountain Road.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Old Oregon Trail
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening/Extension
$410,035
$2,764,955
$3,174,990
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4956-04
Federal HSIP Grant $486,959 $2,001,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,488,559 Traffic Impact Fees $53,996 $222,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $276,396 Total $540,955 $2,224,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,764,955
$540,955 $540,955
$540,955
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,224,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,224,000
$2,224,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,764,955
C-39
Packet Pg. 1116 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Oasis Road Specific Plan Update
Description: Update the Oasis Road Specific Plan.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
North Redding Traffic Benefit District
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$50,000
$50,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-NRTBD-01
North Redding Traffic Benefit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 District Fees
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
$0 $50,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Stillwater Business Park - Phase II
Description: Improvements to Stillwater Business Park.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Stillwater Business Park
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$11,000,000
$11,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-SBP-01
General Fund $4,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 Total $4,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
$4,000,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000
$7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000
C-40
Packet Pg. 1117 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Infiltration and Inflow Control
Repair and rehabilitation of various aging sewer mains throughout the City as needed to reduce rainwater intrusion into the sewer system.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WW-3512-01
Wastewater Rates $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $7,500,000 Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $7,500,000 $100,000 $750,000
$1,000,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000
$900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $1,350,000 $1,800,000 $6,750,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $7,500,000 Lift Station Improvements
Description: Repair/Rehab Lift Stations
Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WW-3525-01
Wastewater Rates $595,110 $279,530 $287,330 $295,350 $303,600 $312,080 $2,073,000 Total $595,110 $279,530 $287,330 $295,350 $303,600 $312,080 $2,073,000 $119,022 $414,600
$595,110
Project Development
Construction
Total
$55,906 $57,466 $59,070 $60,720 $62,416
$476,088 $223,624 $229,864 $236,280 $242,880 $249,664 $1,658,400 $279,530 $287,330 $295,350 $303,600 $312,080 $2,073,000 Locust Lift Station
Description: Replacement of undersized and outdated lift station.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Locust Street at Cypress Square
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$445,787
$1,755,350
$2,201,137
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-3525-04
Wastewater Rates $755,350 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,755,350 Total $755,350 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,755,350
$0 $0
$755,350
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$755,350 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,755,350
$1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,755,350
C-41
Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Westside Interceptor - Phase III
Expansion of the main sewer serving the west region of the City to accommodate growth. Phase III will run from Girvan Road south to the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Girvan Road to the Clear Creek WWTP
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$433,994
$7,294,244
$7,728,238
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-4086-02
Wastewater Connection Fees $1,088,000 $6,206,244 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,294,244 Total $1,088,000 $6,206,244 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,294,244
$1,088,000 $1,088,000
$1,088,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $6,206,244 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,206,244
$6,206,244 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,294,244
Repair/Replace Sewer Lines
Description: Replace aging and damaged clay piping throughout the city.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Various
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WW-4203-02
Wastewater Rates $7,500,000 $4,431,430 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,931,430 Total $7,500,000 $4,431,430 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,931,430 $750,000 $2,093,143
$7,500,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$443,143 $150,000 $150,000 $200,000 $400,000
$6,750,000 $3,988,287 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,800,000 $3,600,000 $18,838,287 $4,431,430 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,931,430 Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Description: Ongoing major maintenance
Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2220 Metz Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WW-4703-01
Wastewater Rates $616,740 $633,950 $651,640 $669,830 $688,520 $707,730 $3,968,410 Total $616,740 $633,950 $651,640 $669,830 $688,520 $707,730 $3,968,410 $123,348 $793,682
$616,740
Project Development
Construction
Total
$126,790 $130,328 $133,966 $137,704 $141,546
$493,392 $507,160 $521,312 $535,864 $550,816 $566,184 $3,174,728 $633,950 $651,640 $669,830 $688,520 $707,730 $3,968,410 C-42
Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant
Description: Ongoing major maintenance
Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
6475 Airport Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WW-4801-05
Wastewater Rates $411,160 $422,640 $434,440 $446,570 $459,030 $471,840 $2,645,680 Total $411,160 $422,640 $434,440 $446,570 $459,030 $471,840 $2,645,680 $82,232 $529,136
$411,160
Project Development
Construction
Total
$84,528 $86,888 $89,314 $91,806 $94,368
$328,928 $338,112 $347,552 $357,256 $367,224 $377,472 $2,116,544 $422,640 $434,440 $446,570 $459,030 $471,840 $2,645,680 Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase II
Description: Full scale build-out for Biosolids final processing.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2220 Metz Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$89,550
$21,000,000
$21,089,550
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-4801-10
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $1,750,000 $0 $1,000,000 $1,750,000 $750,000 $5,250,000 Wastewater Rates $0 $5,250,000 $0 $3,000,000 $5,250,000 $2,250,000 $15,750,000 Total $0 $7,000,000 $0 $4,000,000 $7,000,000 $3,000,000 $21,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$700,000 $0 $400,000 $700,000 $300,000
$0 $6,300,000 $0 $3,600,000 $6,300,000 $2,700,000 $19,000,000 $7,000,000 $0 $4,000,000 $7,000,000 $3,000,000 $21,000,000 North Market Lift Station
Description: Increase capacity and improve flow to North Market Lift Station.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
971 N Market Street
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$580,685
$580,685
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-LS-CC-04
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $134,000 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $30,806 $415,879 $0 $0 $446,685
Total $0 $0 $164,806 $415,879 $0 $0 $580,685
$0 $32,817
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $32,817 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $131,989 $415,879 $0 $0 $547,868
$0 $164,806 $415,879 $0 $0 $580,685
C-43
Packet Pg. 1120 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Lake Redding Interceptor I
Construct approximately 790 feet of 27" pipe, 4,710 feet of 24" pipe, and 60 feet of 21" pipe from N Market Lift Station to Elk Drive.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Lake Redding Estates
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$120,000
$5,252,460
$5,372,460
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-01
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $47,250 $425,471 $0 $0 $472,721 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $477,750 $4,301,989 $0 $0 $4,779,739 Total $0 $0 $525,000 $4,727,460 $0 $0 $5,252,460
$0 $525,000
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $525,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $4,727,460 $0 $0 $4,727,460
$0 $525,000 $4,727,460 $0 $0 $5,252,460
Woodacre Drive
Description: Replace approximately 1,400 feet of old pipe constructed at substandard grade.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Woodacre Drive and Bechelli Lane Area
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$512,394
$512,394
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-28
Wastewater Rates $102,479 $409,915 $0 $0 $0 $0 $512,394 Total $102,479 $409,915 $0 $0 $0 $0 $512,394
$102,479 $102,479
$102,479
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $409,915 $0 $0 $0 $0 $409,915
$409,915 $0 $0 $0 $0 $512,394
Buenaventura Sewer
Description: Replacement of undersized sewer pipe ranging in size from 12- to 18-inches in diameter.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Buenaventura Blvd and Westside Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$5,134,310
$5,134,310
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-4
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $30,806 $415,879 $0 $0 $446,685 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $482,625 $4,205,000 $0 $0 $4,687,625 Total $0 $0 $513,431 $4,620,879 $0 $0 $5,134,310
$0 $513,431
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $513,431 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $4,620,879 $0 $0 $4,620,879
$0 $513,431 $4,620,879 $0 $0 $5,134,310
C-44
Packet Pg. 1121 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Mercury Drive
Description: Replace approximately 1,670 feet of existing 8-inch diameter AC pipe with 12-inch diameter pipe.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Mercury Drive Area
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$662,600
$662,600
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-5
Wastewater Rates $0 $132,520 $530,080 $0 $0 $0 $662,600 Total $0 $132,520 $530,080 $0 $0 $0 $662,600
$0 $132,520
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$132,520 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $530,080 $0 $0 $0 $530,080
$132,520 $530,080 $0 $0 $0 $662,600
Sulphur Creek
Replace approximately 2,730 feet of undersized pipe in Lower Sulphur Creek and approximately 2,700 feet of undersized pipe in Upper Sulphur Creek.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Sulphur Creek Area
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$2,931,430
$2,931,430
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-8-9
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $293,143 $2,638,287 $0 $0 $0 $2,931,430 Total $0 $293,143 $2,638,287 $0 $0 $0 $2,931,430
$0 $293,143
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$293,143 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $2,638,287 $0 $0 $0 $2,638,287
$293,143 $2,638,287 $0 $0 $0 $2,931,430
Oasis Road
Description: Replace approximately 1,200 feet of under capacity pipe.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Oasis Road Area
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$414,290
$414,290
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-01
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $54,686 $218,745 $0 $0 $0 $273,431 Wastewater Rates $0 $28,172 $112,687 $0 $0 $0 $140,859
Total $0 $82,858 $331,432 $0 $0 $0 $414,290
$0 $82,858
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$82,858 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $331,432 $0 $0 $0 $331,432
$82,858 $331,432 $0 $0 $0 $414,290
C-45
Packet Pg. 1122 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Clear Creek Pond Upgrades
Description: Lining of emergency retention ponds.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2220 Metz Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$3,631,930
$3,413,095
$7,045,025
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-3
Wastewater Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $176,050 $677,224 $853,274 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $528,150 $2,031,671 $2,559,821 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $704,200 $2,708,895 $3,413,095
$0 $704,200
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $704,200 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,708,895 $2,708,895
$0 $0 $0 $704,200 $2,708,895 $3,413,095
Organics Receiving
Description: Food Waste & Fats, Oils and Grease receiving station at Clear Creek Treatment Plant.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2220 Metz Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$250,000
$250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-4
Wastewater Rates $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Total $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
$0 $0
$250,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
C-46
Packet Pg. 1123 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Pump Station Improvements
Description: Rehab/repair pump stations.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Various
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-3020-01-02
Water Rates $238,810 $245,470 $252,313 $266,577 $266,577 $274,009 $1,543,756 Total $238,810 $245,470 $252,313 $266,577 $266,577 $274,009 $1,543,756 $23,881 $154,376
$238,810
Project Development
Construction
Total
$24,547 $25,231 $26,658 $26,658 $27,401
$214,929 $220,923 $227,082 $239,919 $239,919 $246,608 $1,389,380 $245,470 $252,313 $266,577 $266,577 $274,009 $1,543,756 Pump House 1 Replacement Environmental
Environmental review for replacing Pump House 1 on the Sacramento River. Alternatives include rehabbing at current location or constructing a new pump house at various upstream locations.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
2300 Riverside Drive
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-3020-04
Water Rates $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Total $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
$1,500,000 $1,500,000
$1,500,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Replace Water Mains
Description: Replace cast-iron, steel, asbestos, galvanized and degraded water mains throughout the City.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Citywide
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Distribution System
W-4286-01
Water Rates $4,876,440 $4,945,020 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $27,821,460 Total $4,876,440 $4,945,020 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $27,821,460 $334,690 $2,168,524
$4,876,440
Project Development
Construction
Total
$200,726 $384,980 $358,861 $345,049 $544,217
$4,541,750 $4,744,294 $2,615,020 $3,641,139 $4,654,951 $5,455,783 $25,652,936 $4,945,020 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $27,821,460 C-47
Packet Pg. 1124 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Lake Boulevard 24" - Keswick to Northpoint
Description: 24" Lake Boulevard - Oasis to Northpoint (9,090 feet) Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Lake Boulevard
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$242,366
$3,000,000
$3,242,366
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4286-19
Water Connection Fees $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
Water Rates $2,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000
Total $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
$300,000 $300,000
$3,000,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,700,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
Well Rehabilitation
Description: Inspect, rehab, clean casing and screens to maintain production capacity.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Various
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-4338-02-03
Water Rates $67,570 $211,660 $71,386 $215,586 $75,422 $219,734 $861,358 Total $67,570 $211,660 $71,386 $215,586 $75,422 $219,734 $861,358 $13,514 $172,270
$67,569
Project Development
Construction
Total
$42,332 $14,277 $43,117 $15,084 $43,946
$54,055 $169,328 $57,109 $172,467 $60,338 $175,787 $689,084 $211,660 $71,386 $215,584 $75,422 $219,733 $861,354
Well Head Treatment System
Enterprise well water quality improvements. Study and implementation of sequestering agents distribution system flushing and loading to reduce iron, manganese and arsenic levels during the next five years. Other major well head treatment improvements postponed pending identification of funding.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Enterprise Wells
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$102,031
$2,873,000
$2,975,031
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4338-04
Water Rates $0 $2,873,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,873,000
Total $0 $2,873,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,873,000
$0 $287,300
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$287,300 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,585,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,585,700
$2,873,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,873,000
C-48
Packet Pg. 1125 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Install Oxidation/Filtration at EW-14
Description: Install oxidation/filtration treatment system to remove manganese.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
5550 Old Oregon Trail
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$4,035,690
$4,035,690
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4338-05
Water Rates $0 $0 $403,570 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $4,035,690
Total $0 $0 $403,570 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $4,035,690
$0 $403,570
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $403,570 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $3,632,120
$0 $403,570 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $4,035,690
Rehab EW-11 or Construct New Well
Description: Rehabilitate EW-11 or design and construct new well at a new location.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
5055 Goodwater Avenue
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$2,119,328
$2,119,328
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4338-06
Water Rates $0 $0 $2,119,328 $0 $0 $0 $2,119,328
Total $0 $0 $2,119,328 $0 $0 $0 $2,119,328
$0 $211,933
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $211,933 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,907,395 $0 $0 $0 $1,907,395
$0 $2,119,328 $0 $0 $0 $2,119,328
Foothill Water Treatment Plant Maintenance
Description: Upgrades at the Foothill Water Treatment Plant to accommodate growth and replace aging equipment.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
3100 Foothill Boulevard
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-4492-01
Water Rates $2,160,820 $1,460,820 $500,000 $513,939 $528,266 $542,993 $5,706,838 Total $2,160,820 $1,460,820 $500,000 $513,939 $528,266 $542,993 $5,706,838 $324,123 $856,026
$2,160,820
Project Development
Construction
Total
$219,123 $513,431 $77,091 $79,240 $81,449
$1,836,697 $1,241,697 $425,000 $436,848 $449,026 $461,544 $4,850,812 $1,460,820 $938,431 $513,939 $528,266 $542,993 $5,706,838 C-49
Packet Pg. 1126 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Cypress Avenue Booster Pump Station
Construction of a 7 MGD pump station at the existing supervisory valve. This pump station will have the ability to pump in either direction between the Foothill and Enterprise pressure zones and greatly increase the flexibility of water delivery in the distribution system.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Cypress Avenue
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$412,480
$2,460,840
$2,873,320
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4600-02
Water Rates $2,460,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,460,840
Total $2,460,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,460,840
$96,423 $96,423
$2,460,840
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,364,417 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,364,417
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,460,840
Buckeye Water Treatment Plant Maintenance
Description: Various maintenance projects at the Buckeye Water Treatment Plant.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
11501 Benson Drive/3100 Foothill Boulevard
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-4606-01
Water Rates $422,320 $125,730 $129,235 $132,838 $136,541 $140,347 $1,087,011 Total $422,320 $125,730 $129,235 $132,838 $136,541 $140,347 $1,087,011 $42,232 $108,700
$422,320
Project Development
Construction
Total
$12,573 $12,923 $13,283 $13,654 $14,035
$380,088 $113,157 $116,312 $119,554 $122,887 $126,312 $978,310 $125,730 $129,235 $132,837 $136,541 $140,347 $1,087,010 Hill 900 Reservoir
Description: Determine location and construct additional reservoir.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
West Side of Redding
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$3,211,740
$3,211,740
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4795-03
Water Rates $1,605,870 $1,605,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,211,740 Total $1,605,870 $1,605,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,211,740
$321,175 $321,175
$321,175
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $2,890,565 $0 $0 $0 $2,890,565
$0 $2,890,565 $0 $0 $0 $3,211,740
C-50
Packet Pg. 1127 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Reservoir Improvements
Description: Rehab/repair 1 MG Cascade tank and 3.5MG Enterprise tank.

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
1987 Kenyon Drive
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$2,075,000
$2,075,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4795-04-05
Water Rates $575,000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $2,075,000 Total $575,000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $2,075,000 $115,000 $115,000
$575,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$460,000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $1,960,000
$500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $2,075,000
Beltline 20" - Oasis to Mountain Lakes
Replace approximately 1,013 feet of existing waterline with 20" waterline to meet water system demands, water supply for new development, and improve fire flows.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Beltline Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$548,548
$548,548
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-01
Water Connection Fees $0 $0 $137,137 $0 $0 $0 $137,137
Water Rates $0 $0 $411,411 $0 $0 $0 $411,411
Total $0 $0 $548,548 $0 $0 $0 $548,548
$0 $109,710
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $109,710 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $438,838 $0 $0 $0 $438,838
$0 $548,548 $0 $0 $0 $548,548
Oasis 20" - UPRR to Beltline
Replace 1225 feet of existing waterline with 20" waterline to meet water system demands, water supply for new development, and improve fire flows.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Oasis Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,026,635
$1,026,635
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-02
Water Connection Fees $0 $0 $205,327 $0 $0 $0 $205,327
Water Rates $0 $0 $821,308 $0 $0 $0 $821,308
Total $0 $0 $1,026,635 $0 $0 $0 $1,026,635
$0 $133,463
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $133,463 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $893,172 $0 $0 $0 $893,172
$0 $1,026,635 $0 $0 $0 $1,026,635
C-51
Packet Pg. 1128 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Oasis 20" - Calexico to A6-V1
Replace 2,475 feet of existing waterline with 20" waterline to meet water system demands, water supply for new development, and improve fire flows.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Oasis Road
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$807,862
$807,862
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-03
Water Connection Fees $0 $69,476 $277,905 $0 $0 $0 $347,381 Water Rates $0 $92,096 $368,385 $0 $0 $0 $460,481
Total $0 $161,572 $646,290 $0 $0 $0 $807,862
$0 $161,572
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$161,572 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $646,290 $0 $0 $0 $646,290
$161,572 $646,290 $0 $0 $807,862
Lake Boulevard 20" - Northpoint to Masonic
Replace 700 feet of existing waterline with 20" waterline to meet water system demands, water supply for new development, and improve fire flows.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Lake Boulevard
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$427,552
$427,552
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-09
Water Connection Fees $0 $0 $123,990 $0 $0 $0 $123,990
Water Rates $0 $0 $303,562 $0 $0 $0 $303,562
Total $0 $0 $427,552 $0 $0 $0 $427,552
$0 $85,510
$0
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $85,510 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $342,042 $0 $0 $0 $342,042
$0 $427,552 $0 $0 $0 $427,552
18" Masonic to Hilltop
Replace 1220 feet of existing waterline with 16" waterline to meet water system demands, water supply for new development, and improve fire flows.

Description:

Location:
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
Masonic to Hilltop
Anticipated Funding 2026-27
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$2,248,105
$2,248,105
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-10
Water Connection Fees $0 $0 $486,079 $0 $0 $0 $486,079
Water Rates $1,600,000 $0 $162,026 $0 $0 $0 $1,762,026
Total $1,600,000 $0 $648,105 $0 $0 $0 $2,248,105
$0 $97,215
$1,600,000
Project Development
Construction
Total
$0 $97,215 $0 $0 $0
$1,600,000 $0 $550,890 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,890
$0 $648,105 $0 $0 $0 $2,248,105
C-52
Packet Pg. 1129 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
The Engineering Division Cost Allocation section provides an approximation of costs for the project development and construction for projects requiring the involvement of the Engineering Division. Project development costs include preliminary engineering, environmental and permitting, right-of-way, design, consultant oversight, and bidding. Construction costs include the construction contract, contract administration, inspection, and consultant oversight.

Note:

C-53
Packet Pg. 1130 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUTURE PROJECTS
Streets
CIP No. Project Funding Source
ST-IN-HA Church Creek/Hartmeyer Intersection DD651511
ST-IN-AL Church Creek/Alrose Intersection DD651510
ST-2005-62 Traffic Control Device: Victor Avenue - El Vista Street DD651449 ST-2005-61 Traffic Control Device: Lake Boulevard - Santa Rosa Way DD651472 ST-2005-60 Canyon Creek Road Area Improvements CCRTIF/Fund 117 ST-2005-57 Traffic Control Device: Airport Road - Meadowview Drive DD651492 ST-2005-51 Traffic Control Device: Hartnell Avenue - Lawrence Road DD651460/DD651445 ST-2005-50 Traffic Control Device: Lake Boulevard - Panorama Drive DD651422 ST-F-104 Shasta View Drive Extension DD650722
ST-F-SV Shasta View Drive/College View Drive DD651506
Water
CIP No. Project Funding Source
W-4286-01 Twin View Waterline DD651440
W-EWT-05 EW12 to EW14 Pipeline Water Rates
W-EWT-03 EW14 Filtration Water Rates
W-EW-01 EW11 Rehab Water Rates
Note: The Future Projects list includes a variety of projects that are either beyond the 5-year window of the CIP and/or do not have all funding sources identified at this time. The identified Water, Wastewater, and Traffic impact fee program projects represent the basis of the relative Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000) compliant programs. Reimbursement for construction of these impact fee projects may be considered in accordance with Section 16.20.090 of the Redding Municipal Code.

C-54
Packet Pg. 1131 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUTURE PROJECTS WITH IMPACT FEE COMPONENT
CIP No. Project
Anticipated
Construction
Date Funding Source
Storm Drain
SD-DET-01 Local Detertion System 2028-29 Storm Drain Fees CIP No. Project
Anticipated
Construction
Date Funding Source
Streets
ST-TIF-PL Placer Street Widening - Pleasant to Airpark 2026-27 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-VC1,2,3 Victor Avenue Widening - Hartnell to Old Alturas 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-HIL Hilltop Drive Widening - River Bend Road to Browning Street 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-CIX Churn Creek Road/SR 299 Interchange 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees/DD651505
ST-TIF-CC1 Churn Creek Road Widening - Browning to Bodenhamer 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-RA Railroad Avenue Widening - Grandview Ave. to Schley Ave. 2030-31 Traffic Impact Fees Old Alturas Road - ROW and Roundabouts at Victor Avenue, Lema Road, and Edgewood Drive
ST-TIF-OLD 2031-32 Traffic Impact Fees
CIP No. Project
Anticipated
Construction
Date Funding Source
Wastewater
WW-P-CC-4 Buenaventura Sewer 2028-29
WW-TP-C-3 Clear Creek WWTP Pond Upgrades 2028-29
Wastewater Connection Fees
Wastewater Connection Fees
C-55
Packet Pg. 1132 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

FUTURE PROJECTS WITH IMPACT FEE COMPONENT
CIP No. Project
Anticipated
Construction
Date Funding Source
Water
W-CONV-15 Construct 30" Waterline from Buckeye Tank to Quartz Hill Road 2028-29 Water Connection Fees/Water Rates
Construct 24" Waterline from Quartz Hill Road to Keswick Dam Road
W-CONV-16 2028-29 Water Connection
Fees/Water Rates
W-CONV-14 New 3.5 MG Buckeye Tank 2028-29 Water Connection Fees/Water Rates
The Future Projects list includes a variety of projects that are either beyond the 5-year window of the CIP and/or do not have all funding sources identified at this time. The identified Water, Wastewater, and Traffic impact fee program projects represent the basis of the relative Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000) compliant programs. Reimbursement for construction of these impact fee projects may be considered in accordance with Section 16.20.090 of the Redding Municipal Code.

Note:

C-56
Packet Pg. 1133 Attachment: CIP 2021-26 Final Draft (available online) (6.3--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 Second Quarter Financial Report and Industry Activities Update.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact related to accepting this report.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to not accept the report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
Attached for review and information purposes is Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) financial report for the second quarter. The report provides year-to-date comparisons to the current budget and the same year-to-date results for the prior year.

This financial report contains unaudited results through December 31, 2021. Operating revenues are reported as billed. Costs for energy, other operating expenses, and capital outlay are recorded when paid. Debt service will be paid twice this year (in December and June). For this report, debt payments are spread evenly over the year, which allows for a more helpful picture of the financial results throughout the year. These recorded results are preliminary and subject to revision until the final audit is complete.

MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.5(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.5(c)--Consider Redding Electric Utility's Quarterly Financial Report and Industry Activities Update
Nick Zettel, Interim Director
of Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 1134
Report to Redding City Council February 7, 2022
Re: 9.5(c)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter Page 2 Projections are based on normal weather trends and known industry activity. If actual weather conditions are above or below average for the month, or unexpected industry disruption occurs, revenue and expenses will tend to increase or decrease accordingly. REU’s residential rate structure is heavily weighted on volumetric charges ($/kWh), and abnormal weather causes more significant variances in Net Operating Results, emphasizing the difference between the rate structure and cost structure.

The December year-to-date quarterly Financial Report shows REU performed better than expected primarily due to resource optimization at the local and Joint Powers Authority (JPA) level. REU’s financial position is less favorable than at this time last year, and the cash reserve balance is within the City Council’s Financial Management Policy.

Revenue
Through December, billed retail revenue was $3,165,251 (4.8 percent) above the projection.

Total wholesale sales for the period were $8,276,685 (152.6 percent) above projections. Overall, operating revenue for the period came in $10,453,822 (14.0 percent) above projections. On balance, operating revenue after energy costs was $2,915,798 (8.2 percent) above expectations.

The primary driver for increased wholesale sales was sales into the California Independent Systems Operator (CAISO) and participation in the Energy Imbalance Market (EIM). Total Operating Revenues increased by 0.1 percent from the previous fiscal year.

Expenses
Power Cost (Cost of Energy)
The combined costs for generation, purchases from the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), Big Horn Wind Project, contracts, and the spot market were $7,538,024 (19.3 percent) above budget projections through the second quarter. The actual cost of Redding Power Plant (RPP) generation was higher than forecast due to an increase in load, price of natural gas, and the inclusion of gas purchases for wholesale energy sales. Total Cost of Energy increased by 10.2 percent from the previous fiscal year.

System Operations & Maintenance (O&M)
System O&M costs through the second quarter were $3,561,917 (13.5 percent) below projections. Approximately 50 percent of these savings are attributable to employee vacancies.

Other factors are the timing of expenditures and delays in professional services engagements.

Net Operating Results
Recorded data through the second quarter shows positive net financial results before capital outlay of $15,913,202; these results are $6,477,715 better than budget projections, primarily due to increased Operating Revenues.

Packet Pg. 1135
Report to Redding City Council February 7, 2022
Re: 9.5(c)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter Page 3 Debt Service and Capital Outlay
Debt service payment and obligation through the second quarter totaled $6,392,785. Capital Expenditures through the second quarter totaled $7,778,016 (28.7 percent spent). It should be noted that Capital encumbrances total approximately $9.4 million (projects in progress), which is included in REU’s remaining capital budget of $19.3 million.

Special Fund Expenditures
Special Fund Expenditures include Public Benefit and Cap-and-Trade Programs, totaling $4,577,008 (26.3 percent spent) through the second quarter. Encumbrances total approximately $2.8 million (projects in progress), including REU’s remaining Special Fund budget of $12.8 million.

Electric Utility Unrestricted Cash Balance
At the end of the second quarter, the unrestricted cash balance was $54.7 million and represented approximately 138 days of cash on hand. Unencumbered capital projects total approximately $9.9 million. The City Council Financial Management Policy has a goal of 150 days of cash on hand – 75 days for Operating Costs (i.e., higher energy costs), 30 days for System Critical Failure (i.e., wildfire), and 45 days for Rate Stabilization.

Director’s Contingency Fund
The REU Director’s Contingency Fund was not utilized through the second quarter.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
c: Allyn F. Clark, Finance Director
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Notes on Financial Operating Statement
Attachment 2 - Electric Utility Financial Results for Dec 2021 Attachment 3 - Electric Utility Financial Dashboard for Dec 2021 Attachment 4 - Electric Utility Unrestricted Cash Balance Dec 2021 Attachment 5 - Industry Update
Packet Pg. 1136
City of Redding Electric Utility
Quarterly Financial Report
Notes on Financial Operating Statement
Operating revenues are divided into three revenue elements: Retail Sales are sales of electricity to end-use customers; Wholesale Sales are to customers who resell electricity; Other Revenue includes the sale of services, joint-pole arrangements, interest income, and other miscellaneous revenue generated in the operations of Redding Electric Utility (REU).

Operating Expenses are divided into two expense elements: Power Cost (Cost of Energy) and System Operation & Maintenance (O&M). Cost of Energy summarizes Purchased Power costs.

The main sources of purchased power REU uses include Western Area Power Administration deliveries, as well as long-term contracts for Wind Energy through M-S-R. Fuel expenses and purchases from the spot market along with expenses associated with participation in the California Independent System Operator make up the remainder. The Generation and Transmission component comprises power plant variable costs (fuel) and fixed costs (all non-fuel costs), as well as all JPA costs (M-S-R and TANC), except Wind Energy.

The budgets for Wholesale Sales and Power Costs are based on known contracts and confirmed resources. Throughout the year, effort is made to provide the most efficient source of energy for our ratepayers. This is often done by buying and selling natural gas or electricity to reduce the overall cost. This could include selling natural gas and replacing it with electricity that is less expensive than burning the gas in our own power plant. It could also include selling energy that we have contracted for at one trading hub and buying it at another trading hub that is less expensive. It could also include maximizing the value of our gas storage facility to buy natural gas in one month when it is less expensive and use it or sell it in another month. All these types of transactions have net benefits to our customers, but greatly inflate the Wholesale Sales and Cost of Energy numbers in excess of their original budgets. This is because accounting rules require us to record these transactions at their gross revenue and expense amounts and not on the net benefit to the Utility.

System O&M Expenses summarizes costs for all other functional groups, i.e. Administration, Customer Services, Engineering, Financial Services, Line, Compliance, and Resources.

Special Revenue funds, i.e. Public Benefits and Cap-and-Trade, are shown separately.

Debt Service is paid twice per fiscal year, once in December and again in June.

Capital Outlay includes current-year appropriations as well as unfinished projects approved by the Council in prior years.

Attachment 1
Packet Pg. 1137 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Notes on Financial Operating Statement (9.5(c)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter) ELECTRIC UTILITY FINANCIAL RESULTS ‐ DECEMBER 31, 2021
YTD‐Actual YTD‐Budget Variance Variance YTD‐Actual
December December % Value December
Item FY2022 FY2022 FY2022 FY2022 FY2021
Energy
System Load (MWh) 428,136                          410,404 4.3% 17,731                               401,964 Operating Revenues
Retail Sales 69,069,251                65,904,000 4.8% 3,165,251                     69,522,539 Wholesale Sales 13,700,903                  5,424,218 152.6% 8,276,685                     13,774,372 Miscellaneous Income 2,492,461                     ‐ 3,480,575 28.4% (988,114)                         1,849,235 Total Operating Revenues 85,262,615                74,808,793 14.0% 10,453,822                  85,146,146 Operating Expenses
Power Cost
Purchased Power 13,451,255                  9,561,511 40.7% 3,889,744                     13,436,294 Generation, Transmission and JPA (Variable) 17,399,292                13,153,505 32.3% 4,245,787                     16,090,494 Generation A&G and O&M (Fixed) 15,756,888                 ‐ 16,354,395 3.7% (597,507)                       12,774,748 Subtotal Power Cost 46,607,435              39,069,411 19.3% 7,538,024                   42,301,535 System O&M
General & Administrative 2,880,324                     ‐ 3,663,710 21.4% (783,386)                         2,505,034 Payment in Lieu of Tax 2,732,000                    2,732,000 0.0% 0                                      3,048,795 Transmission & Distribution 12,701,549                 ‐ 14,744,921 13.9% (2,043,371)                    10,145,874 Customer & Field Services 4,428,105                     ‐ 5,163,265 14.2% (735,160)                         4,241,375 Subtotal System O&M 22,741,979               ‐ 26,303,896 13.5% (3,561,917)                  19,941,078 Total Operating Expenses 69,349,413 $     $    65,373,306 6.1% 3,976,107 $          $    62,242,613 Net Operating Revenue 15,913,202 $     $       9,435,487 68.7% 6,477,715 $          $    22,903,533 Total Debt Service 6,392,785 $        $        ‐ 6,392,785 $            ‐ $                       $       6,390,160 YTD‐Actual Budget % of Budget Budget YTD‐Actual
December Annual Spent Remaining December
Item FY2022 FY2022 FY2022 FY2022 FY2021
Capital Outlay
Capital Outlay (Revenue Funded) 7,778,016                  27,065,700 28.7% 19,287,684                     3,538,095 Capital Outlay (Bond Funded)
Total Capital Outlay 7,778,016 $        $    27,065,700 28.7% 19,287,684 $        $       3,538,095 Special Fund Expenditures
Public Benefit Programs 2,080,128                    6,714,040 31.0% 4,633,912                       3,361,497 Cap‐and‐Trade Programs 2,496,880                  10,665,740 23.4% 8,168,860                       1,637,809 Total Special Fund Expenditures 4,577,008 $        $    17,379,780 26.3% 12,802,772 $        $       4,999,306 Financial Results (2,834,608) $      $       7,975,972
Council Report
Packet Pg. 1138 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Electric Utility Financial Results for Dec 2021 (9.5(c)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter) ELECTRIC UTILITY FINANCIAL DASHBOARD - DECEMBER 31, 2021 2.3 3.54.0 4.0 3.5 3.2 -
2 4
6 8
10 12
14 16

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
$-Millions
Retail Sales ($-Millions)
Cummulative Difference 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2022 Budget -0.3

0.8 2.0

1.3 3.8

4.0 (2)
-
2 4
6 8
10 12
14 16

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
$-Millions
Operating Expense ($-Millions)
Cummulative Difference 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2022 Budget Packet Pg. 1139 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Electric Utility Financial Dashboard for Dec 2021 (9.5(c)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter) Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Unrestricted Cash - 2021-22 52.0 57.6 58.4 59.1 54.0 54.7 Unrestricted Cash - 2020-21 66.3 66.0 68.3 69.0 65.1 64.1 54.2 53.2 52.6 51.2 46.7 52.6

45.0 50.0

55.0 60.0

65.0 70.0

75.0 MILLION $

REU UNRESTRICTED CASH BALANCE
JULY 2020 - JUNE 2022
Packet Pg. 1140 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Electric Utility Unrestricted Cash Balance Dec 2021 (9.5(c)--Electric Utility's City of Redding Electric Utility
Industry Activities Update – January 2022
Federal Legislation Update
A total of 469 seats in the U.S. Congress are up for election in November. As of January 2022, 48 members of Congress – six members of the Senate and 42 members of the House of Representatives – have announced they will not seek re-election in 2022.

The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee held a strategic hearing that will affect hydropower in the west for decades to come. The hearing focused on the opportunities and challenges for maintaining existing hydropower capacity, expanding hydropower at non-powered dams, and increasing pumped storage hydropower. Both Democrats and Republicans agree that hydropower is a valuable clean resource, the licensing processes are overly burdensome, and congressional action is needed.

State Legislative Update
The 2022 legislative session is underway with committees hearing some of the carry-over bills from 2021 that did not pass their house of origin. This appears to be a very active year on energyrelated issues.

NCPA and the legislative committee will carefully monitor these bills moving forward as the legislature begins deliberation. The main areas of interest are enhanced EV spending on infrastructure, energy storage, hydrogen, and building decarbonization.

The start of 2022 has also brought forth many changes in the composition of commissioners and board members running the state’s key energy agencies. The California Public Utilities Commission has a new president and while each of the CPUC members has vast energy policy experience, most of the commissioners have been in their current roles for less than a year.

State Regulatory Update
On December 22, 2021, the California Energy Commission (CEC) took a step towards increasing efficiency and demand flexibility in California's electricity grid and formally began the process of updating Load Management Standards. The proposed regulation would require California’s five largest electric utilities and the state’s community choice aggregators to develop time-dependent rates to reflect locational marginal costs for each customer class, and submit those rates to the utility’s ratemaking authority for approval within one year of the effective date of the regulation.

Although REU is not directly impacted by the Load Management Standards, the proposed regulation would require REU to develop and consider certain rate structures. Publicly Owned Utilities (POUs) are working with their associations on submitting comments to the proposed regulation due to the concern that the proposed regulation encroaches on POU’s rate-making authority.

Packet Pg. 1141 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Industry Update (9.5(c)--Electric Utility's Quarterly Report - 2nd Quarter)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept oral presentation.

Attachments
Traffic Calming Handout
MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.11(k)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(k)--Oral report regarding City of Redding Traffic Calming Program.

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 1142
Trac Calming Program
What are Speed Tables?
Speed tables are a trac calming measure used to lower the average speed of vehicular trac. They are not an ocial trac control device, but are o ered as a trac calming option
by the City of Redding to residential areas to address speeding issues and provide trac calming.

They di
er from speed bumps in that they have a wider flatter top, ramping down to the roadway on the approach and departure.

If City residents wish to install a speed table in their neighborhood, please review the following process:

Requirements:
•Must be a Residential District
•Posted speed limit less than or equal to 35 mph
• Vehicular volume is greater than 1,200 but less than 5,000 cars per day • Prevailing speed (85% of vehicles) of 32 mph or greater If you are in a residential district and the speed limit of the road request is 35 mph or less, please complete the speed table request using the link below:
www.cityofredding.org/departments/public-works/trac/
trac-operations-inquiry-request

How to Apply for a Residential Speed Table
Packet Pg. 1143 Attachment: Traffic Calming Handout (9.11(k)--Oral report regarding City of Redding Traffic Calming Program) Trac Calming Program
City sta
will perform necessary trac studies for speed and volume. If studies support speed tables, the requested street will be assigned points and ranked according to volume, speed, collision history, residential density, and pedestrian trac.

City funding available for each candidate will range from 0% to 100% based on the ranking according to points in the chart below.

Please note: If a street is not a candidate for speed tables, other trac calming measures may be considered such as RPD patrol or radar feedback signs.

Installation Process
• Speed table installations are a neighborhood driven process. If a candidate moves forward in the program, a petition showing support of at least 67% of residents on the a
ected street and required surrounding areas is required. • Once a candidate is selected for installation, a letter and exhibit will be mailed to a
ected residents notifying them of the proposed installation. A separate letter will also be mailed to residents for whom the proposed speed table is directly adjacent to their property.
• The City of Redding Streets Department will then perform the installations. Due to material availability, installations are typically done between late spring and early fall.

Typically, the trac calming budget allows for 1 to 2 locations per year.

Candidate Selection Process
Total Points City Funding Available
0-5 0%
6-10 25%
11-15 50%
16-20 75%
21 - 40 100%
Questions? Contact City of Redding Trac at 530.225.4170 or visit cityofredding.org Packet Pg. 1144 Attachment: Traffic Calming Handout (9.11(k)--Oral report regarding City of Redding Traffic Calming Program)

Redding City CouncilFebruary 15, 2022

Redding City Council
February 15, 2022