Agenda packet — Redding City Council, December 6, 2022

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (Doors open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA
December 6, 2022
6:00 PM
The City Council Chambers are fully open to the public in compliance with current guide lines from the California Department of Public Health regarding indoor meetings.

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR KRISTEN SCHREDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Jen McCloskey. Redding Police and Fire Departments' Chaplain C. Roll Call

2. PRESENTATIONS

2A. Adopt Resolution certifying the canvass of ballots as prepared by the Shasta County Clerk - Registrar of Voters; and declaring the results of the November 8, 2022, Consolidated General Municipal Election as follows: (1) Michael Dacquisto, Tenessa Audett e, and Jack Munns received the highest number of votes for the three vacant City Council Member positions; (2) Pamela Mize received the highest number of votes for the City Clerk position; and (3) Ballot Measure A, seeking voter approval to convert the off ices of City Clerk and City Treasurer to appointed instead of elected positions, failed to receive a majority of the vote.

2B. Administer Oath of Office to City Clerk-Elect Pamela Mize.

2C. Administer Oath of Office to City Council Members-Elect Michael Dacquisto, Tenessa Audette, and Jack Munns.

2D. Selection of Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Mayor Pro Tempore.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please fill out a blue Speaker Request Form, located in the lighted alcoves at the back of the Council Chambers, and submit it to the City Clerk. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.org or in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council December 6, 2022

Page 2 ends

2E. Adopt Resolution honoring Kristen Schreder for service on the Redding City Council from December 2, 2014, to December 6, 2022.

2F. Adopt Resolution honoring Erin D. Resner for service on the Redding City Council from December 4, 2018, to December 6, 2022.

2G. Presentation of Mayor's Appreciation Gavel to Mayor Emeritus Kristen Schreder for service as Redding Mayor from December 2021 to December 2022.

2H. Presentations to Kristen Schreder in appreciation of her service as a member of the City Council for the City of Redding.

2I. Presentations to Erin D. Resner in appreciation of her service as a member of the City Council for the City of Redding.

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items c onsidered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calend ar, please fill out a Speaker Request Form and submit it to the City Clerk before the Consent Calendar is considered . It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation.

4(b). Accept City of Redding Accounts P ayable Register No. 9; and Payroll Register No. 10.

4(c). Accept the City of Redding Treasurer’s Report for the month of October 2022.

4(d). Accept City of Redding Proof of Cash reconciliation and ACR133 report for the month of October 2022.

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS

The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non -agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted a Speaker Request Form to the City Clerk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

Redding City Council December 6, 2022

Page 3 ends

4(e). Adopt Ordinance No. 26 55, an o rdinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.02 (Building Code) by amending Section 16.02.010 (California Building Code Adopted); Chapter 16.03 (Residential Code) by amending Section 16.03.010 (California Residential Code Adopted); Chapter

16.04 (Mechanical Code) by amending Section 16.04.010 (California Mechanical Code Adopted); Chapter 16.05 (Plumbing Code) by amending Section 16.05.010 (C alifornia Plumbing Code Adopted); Chapter 16.06 (Electrical Code) by amending Section 16.06.010 (California Electrical Code Adopted); Chapter 16.07 (Energy Code) by amending Section 16.07.010 (California Energy Code Adopted); Chapter 16.08 (Green Building Standards Code) by amending Section 16.08.010 (California Green Building Standards Code Adopted); Chapter 16.09 (Housing Code) by amending Section 16.09.010 (International Maintenance Code Adopted), and making Findings of Facts relating to local climatic, geological, and topographic conditions, all relating to the adoption of the California Building Standards Codes.

4(f). Adopt Ordinance No. 2656, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administrat ion and Personnel) to Repeal and Reenact Chapter 2.32 (Fire Department).

4(g). Adopt Ordinance No. 26 57, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code) by amending Sections 9.20.010 (Adoption), 9.20.020 (Title), 9.20.030 (Supplemental Rules, Regulations and Standards), 9.20.040 (Fire Prevention Division), 9.20.050 (Self -Inspection), 9.20.060 (Appeals),

9.20.070 (Violation Penalties), 9 .20.080 (Enforcement – Citation Authority),

9.20.090 (Fees), 9.20.100 (Open Burning, Recreational Fires, and Outdoor Fireplaces), 9.20.110 (Fire Apparatus Access Roads), 9.20.120 (Premises Identification), 9.20.130 (Fire Hydrants), 9.20.140 (Fire Protection Systems),

9.20.150 (Exis ting Buildings), 9.20.160 (High -Piled Combustible Storage),

9.20.170 (Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition), 9.20.180 (Regulations for Fireworks), 9.20.200 (Referenced Standards), 9.20.210 (Appendix B – Fire Flow Requirements for Buildings), 9.20.220 (Appendix C – Footnote Additions), and 9.20.230 (Appendix D), and adding Section 9.20.195 (Flammable and Combustible Liquid Storage).

4.4(a). Authorize the following actions relative to funding and implementing an online automated solar permitting program:
(1) Approve submittal of application to the California Energy Commission for a California Automated Permit Processing Program Grant in the amount of $60,000; and
(2) Authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, appropriate funds should the grant be awarded, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project.

Redding City Council December 6, 2022

Page 4 ends

4.5(a). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Request for Proposals No. 5289 for Engineering Services for the des ign of a new 115/12kV Electric Substation in East Redding:
(1) Approve the Consulting and Professional Services Contract with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. , in the amount of $341,900 for engineering services to design a new 115/12kV substation; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements or documents required to complete the stated scope of work.

4.5(b). Authorize the following relative to Bid Schedule No. 5318, Residential Single - Phase Solid-State Watt-Hour Meters:
(1) Accept the apparent low bid by Anixter, Inc., and award to Anixter, Inc. , for an annual evaluated cost of $334,570 . The contract period shall be from November 15, 2022, through September 30, 2023;
(2) Authorize the Purchasing Officer to extend the bid award annually with Anixter, Inc., through September 30, 2027, if mutually agreeable, with all terms and conditions remaining the same; the contract may be extended annually for four additional one -year periods through September 30, 2027, with price adjustments in direct proportion to the Producer Price Index.; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve changes to future pricing terms and policies as needed due to inflation and unstable economic conditions.

4.11(a). Authorize the following actions relative to sole -source procurement of equipment for the City of Redding Water Utility:
(1) Approve networking equipment from Cisco and Palo Alto in an amount not to exceed $450,000 for Fiscal Year 2022 -23 to include system routers, ethernet switches, firewalls, and other network equipment and their associated licensing software and support service; and (2) Find that the action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 – Existing Facilities.

4.11(b). Authorize the following actions r elative to Bid Schedule No. 5 302 (Job No. 5424-98) City Council Chambers Audio Visual Upgrade Project:
(1) Award to Conti, LLC, in the amount of $456,333;
(2) Approve an additional $52,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees and $61,000 for project development costs; (3) Approve $46,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $10,000;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 74 th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $105,340 in funds for the project; and
(6) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301( a) - Existing Facilities.

Redding City Council December 6, 2022

Page 5 ends

4.12(a). Authorize issuance of a sole -source Purchase Order to JRC, Inc., dba NorCal Presort for City of Redding mail services for the period of January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, in the approximate amount of $285,000 per year; and authorize the Purchasing Officer to extend the term on an annual basis for an additional five years, if mutually agreeable, with all terms and conditions remaining the same except for any increase in the United States Posta l Service rate, and an increase in the mail processing per letter fee, not to exceed one cent, over the entire five year term.

4.15(b). Approve and authorize the following actions:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving an amendment to the Executive Management Pay-For-Performance Salary Plan (Unrepresented) adding a newly created classification titled Transit Manager, effective December 11, 2022; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 75th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 20 21-078 adding a full -time position of Transit Manager to the City of Redding Public Works Transportation Division.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & C OMMUNICATIONS OF DEP ARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

Community Services

9.6(a). Consider conceptual plan and authorize submittal of the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Grant Application for South City Park in the City of Redding.

Recommendation:

Authorize the following relative to the design, funding, permitting, engineering, and construction of improvements at South City Park:
(1) Approve the conceptual plan;
(2) Authorize the submission of an Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership application in the amount of $3.5 million to begin phase one construction of the South City Park improvements;
(3) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Sections 15301(d) – Existing Facilities, 15302(C) – Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303(d & e) - New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures; and (4) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partners hip Program application process.

Redding City Council December 6, 2022

Page 6 ends

Personnel

9.15(a).

Consider adoption of uncodified Ordinance No. 2654 amending City of Redding’s contract with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) to allow classic local safety members in the Unrepresented Public Safety Management Employees group to share additional costs of the retirement benefit.

Recommendation:

Adopt Ordinance No. 2654, an uncodified ordinance of the City Council authorizing an amendment to the contract (C -99) between t he City Council of the City of Redding and the Board of Administration of CalPERS as allowed in Section 20516 of the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (Employees Sharing Additional Cost) for Unrepresented Public Safety Management Employees.

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]

Information Only

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT

Redding City Council December 6, 2022

Page 7 ends

Pursuant to the Brown Act, non -confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3 rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181 , an d will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: http://scac.cablecast.tv:8080/CablecastPublicSite/watch/4?channel=1. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.org/. Open the City’s meetings and agendas portal; Clic k on tab named "Meetings Videos" and select Redding City Council under “Available Archives 2022” select the desired date, then click on “video” to view the meeting.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons wit h disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225 -4447 or in person, or by mail at 77 7 Cypress Avenue, 3 rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discriminati on under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, rega rdless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution certifying the canvass of ballots as prepared by the Shasta County Clerk - Registrar of Voters; and declaring the results of the November 8, 2022, Consolidated General Municipal Election as follows: (1) Michael Dacquisto, Tenessa Audette, and Jack Munns received the highest number of votes for the three vacant City Council Member positions ; (2) Pamela Mize received the highest number of votes for the City Clerk position; and (3) Ballot Measure A, seeking voter approval to convert the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer to appointed instead of elected positions, failed to receive a majority of the vote.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact to adopting the resolution.

Alternative Action

The City Counci l could choose to not adopt the resolution declaring the results of the election and provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis

At its meeting on June 21, 202 2, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 202 2-057 consolidating the City of R edding’s General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election, and authorizing the Shasta County Clerk - Registrar of Voters to canvass the returns of the election pursuant to Government Code.

A Consolidated General Municipal Election was held i n the City of Redding on November 8, 2022, for the purpose of electing three City Council Members and a City Clerk for full terms of four years each and to present to the voters Measure A, seeking to convert the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer to appointed instead of elected positions.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 2A
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2A--Consider Resolution declaring results of the November 8, 2022, Consolidated General Municipal Election.

Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 8
Report to Redding City Council December 1, 2022
Re: 2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results Page 2

Based on the Shasta County Clerk - Registrar of Voters’ official canvass, the attached resolution declares the results of the Consolidated General Munic ipal Election as follows: Michael Dacquisto, Tenessa Audette, and Jack Munns received the highest number of votes for the three vacant City Council Member positions. Pamela Mize received the highest number of votes for the City Clerk position. Measure A, seeking to convert the Offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer to appointed instead of elected positions, failed.

Of the 55,644 registered voters in the City of Redding, 33,491 voted, resulting in a 60.19 percent voter turnout.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under California Environmental Qual ity Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report
Packet Pg. 9
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE CONSOLIDATED GENERAL

MUNCIPAL ELECTION HELD IN T HE CITY OF REDDING ON
NOVEMBER 8, 2022

WHEREAS, a Consolidated General Municipal Election was duly held in the City of Redding on the 8th day of November , 2022, for the purpose of electing three City Council Members, a City Clerk, and to present, for voter approval, Ballot Measure A, as set forth hereinafter; and

WHEREAS, the Shasta County Clerk and Registrar of Voters has canvassed the returns of the election pursuant to Government Code;

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Redding hereby resolves and declares as follows:

1. That the persons re ceiving votes for the offices of City Council Member and the total number of votes that each received is as follows:

CITY COUNCIL MEMBER TOTAL VOTES
Michael Dacquisto 13,579
Tenessa Audette 10,507
Jack Munn 9,286 Alex Shea 8,612 Joshua Johnson 7,731 Marcus Partin 6,947 James Crockett 6,330 Kymberly Vollmers 5,575
Jordan Valenzuela 4,955
Ian Hill 3,768

2. That the three candidates receiving the highest number of votes for the offices of City Council Member, Michael Dacquisto, Tenessa Audette, and Jack Munns, are hereby declared the elected City Council Members of the City of Redding for full terms of four years, effective December 6, 2022.

3. That the person receiving votes for the office of City Clerk, and the total number of votes received are as follows:

CITY CLERK TOTAL VOTES
Pamela Mize 23,309

Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: ^Resolution (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results)

4. That the candidate receiving the highest number of votes for the office of City Clerk , Pamela Mize, is hereby declared the elected City Clerk of the City of Redding for a full term of four years, effective December 6, 2022.

5. That Measure A, seeking voter approval to convert the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer to appointed instead of elected positions was submitted to the electors at said election and the total votes for and against said measure is as follows:

YES – 11,562 NO – 18,486

6. That Measure A did not receive a majority of the votes cast and is hereby declared as Failed.

7. That the number of votes cast for each of the candidates for the offices of City Council Member and City Clerk and for and against Measure A are as set forth and shown on the attached Shasta County Clerk -Registrar of Voters’ Final Official Summary Report and made a part hereof by reference.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of December , 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

_________________________________ _________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: ^Resolution (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results) Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: ^ Resolution Attachment - ROV Final Report (2A--Certification of November 8, 2022, Election Results)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Administer Oath of Office to City Clerk-Elect Pamela Mize.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 2B
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2B--Oath of Office for City Clerk-Elect Pamela Mize Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 22

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Administer Oath of Office to City Council Members-Elect Michael Dacquisto, Tenessa Audette, and Jack Munns.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 2C
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2C--Oath of Office for City Council Members -Elect Michael Dacquisto, Tenessa Audette, and Jack Munns.

Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 23

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Selection of Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Mayor Pro Tempore.

Background/Analysis

The City Council typically reorganizes at its first meeting in December of each year. The Redding Municipal Code does not specify how the City Council will select the new Mayor, new Vice Mayor, and new Mayor Pro Tempore. Council members Kristen Schred er, Michael Dacquisto, and Mark Mezzano currently serve as Mayor, Vice Mayor , and Mayor Pro Tempore, respectively.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 2D
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2D--City Council Reorganization
Packet Pg. 24

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution honoring Kristen Schreder for service on the Redd ing City Council from December 2, 2014, to December 6, 2022.

Attachments
^Resolution
MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 2E
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2E--Resolution honoring Kristen Schreder for service on the Redding City Council.

Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 25

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

COMMENDING AND HONORING KRISTEN SCHREDER FOR SERVICE

TO THE CITY OF REDDING

WHEREAS, Kristen Schreder has served as a member of the Redding City Council from December 2, 2014, to December 6, 2022, providing eight years of dedicated service to the community; and

WHEREAS, during her tenure, Kristen Schreder served two terms as Mayor from December 5, 20 17, to December 4, 2018, and December 7, 2021, and December 6, 2022, and has executed the role of City Council Member and Mayor with pride and integrity; and

WHEREAS, Kristen Schreder served her community in many ways, not only as Mayor and City Council Member, but also serving as the City Council liaison to the following City of Redding departments, committees, and agencies: City Clerk, Community Services, Electric Utility, Finance, Housing, Information Technology, Personnel, Public Works, Audit Committee, Community Development Advisory Committee, Community Services Advisory Committee, Redding Capital Services Corporation, Redding Housing Authority, Redding Joint Powers Financing Authority, Redding Municipal Library, City of Redding as Successor Agency to the Redding Redevelopment Agency; and the following local agencies: Downtown Collaborative, Economic Development Corporation, Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee, League of California Cities, Public Access TV (Shasta County Arts Council), Redding Area Bus Authority, Shasta County Air Pollution Control Board, Shasta County Community Action Board, Shasta County Remote Access Network Advisory Committee, Shasta Public Library Citizens’ Advisory Committee, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency, and Youth Options Shasta.

WHEREAS, Kristen Schreder has provided support and leadership during the formulation, construction and/or completion phases of the following projects and successes:

• City Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic including development of the Covid-19 Economic Response Plan • Cannabis Regulatory Framework and Taxation
• Nur Pon Open Space
• High Speed Fiber Broadband Ring
• River Crossing Marketplace
• Garden of Lights
• Downtown Revitalization
• Carr Fire Response
• Enterprise Resource Planning Software Upgrade
• Critical Incidence Response Team
• Housing Crisis and Emergency Housing Sites
• Soccer Park Renovation
• Replacement of the Computer Aided Dispatch System
• Caldwell Junior Bike Park and Skate Park
• Improvements to the Coordinated Entry and Point in Time Count Process • Blueprint for Public Safety
• Communications Team Start-up
• Air Service Enhancements
• Multiple Active Transportation Projects including Diestelhorst to Downtown • Redding Electric Utility Fire Mitigation Plan
• Increased Redding Police Department Sworn Officer and Community Service Officer positions • Three Firefighters on every engine in the Redding Fire Department • Redding Riverfront Specific Plan Update
• Downtown Specific Plan Update

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding commends Kristen Schreder for her dedication and the many contributions she has made to the City of Redding and its citizens.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Redding City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of December 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS -
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS -
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS -
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS -

____________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED TO FORM:

_______________________________________ ___________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: ^Resolution (2E--Resolution honoring Kristen Schreder)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution honoring Erin D. Resner for service on the Redd ing City Council from December 4, 2018, to December 6, 2022.

Attachments
^Resolution
MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 2F
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2F--Resolution honoring Erin D. Resner for service on the Redding City Council.

Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 27

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING COMMENDING AND HONORING ERIN D. RESNER FOR SERVICE

TO THE CITY OF REDDING

WHEREAS, Erin D. Resner has served as a member of the Redding City Council from December 4, 201 8, to December 6, 2022, providing four years of dedicated service to the community; and

WHEREAS, during her tenure, Erin D. Resner served as Mayor from December 1, 2020, to December 7, 2021, and has executed the role of City Council Member and Mayor with pride and integrity; and

WHEREAS, Erin D. Resner served her community in many ways, not only as Mayor and City Council Member, but also serving as a Community Services Advisory Commissioner, and City Council liaison to the following City of Redding departments, committees, and agencies: City Clerk, Community Services , Development Services, Personnel, and Police, Audit Committee, Community Services Advisory Commission, Planning Commission, Redding Capital Services Corporation, Redding Housing Authority, Redding Joint Powers Financing Authority, Redding Municipal Library, City of Redding as Successor Agency to the Redding Redevelopment Agency ; and as the City’s alternate representative to the Shasta County Air Pollution Control Board, Shasta County Airport Land Use Commission , Economic Development Corporation, and Shasta Regional Transportation Agency , and the following local agencies: Downtown Collaborative, Enterprise -Anderson Groundwater Sustainabi lity Agency, Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee, League of California Cities, Northern Sacramento Valley Integrated Regional Water Management Governance Board, Redding Area Bus Authority, Redding Area Water Council – Policy Advisory Committee, Youth Violence Prevention Council of Shasta County.

WHEREAS, Erin D. Resner has provided support and leadership during the formulation, construction and/or completion phases of the following projects and successes:

• City Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic including development of the Covid-19 Economic Response Plan • Cannabis Regulatory Framework and Taxation
• Pickleball Courts at Enterprise Park
• High Speed Fiber Broadband Ring
• River Crossing Marketplace
• Downtown Redding Revitalization
• Carr Fire Response
• Garden of Lights
• Caldwell Junior Bike Park and Skate Park
• Enterprise Resource Planning software upgrade
• Soccer Park Renovation
• Nur Pon Open Space
• Air Service Enhancements
• Airport Strategic Plan
• REU Fire Mitigation Plan
• Increased Redding Police Department Sworn Officer and Community Service Officer positions • Three Firefighters on every engine in the Redding Fire Department • Diestelhorst to Downtown Bike Path
• Redding Riverfront Specific Plan Update Downtown Specific Plan Update

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding commends Erin D. Resner for her dedication and the many contributions she has made to the City of Redding and its citizens.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Redding City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of December 20 22, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS -
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS -
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS -
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS -

____________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED TO FORM:

____________________________________ ___________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: ^Resolution (2F--Resolution honoring Erin D. Resner)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Presentation of Mayor's Appreciation Gavel to Mayor Emeritus Kristen Schreder for service as Redding Mayor from December 2021 to December 2022.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 2G
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2G--Presentation of Mayor's Appreciation Gavel to Kristen Schreder for service as Redding Mayor from December 2021 to December 2022.

Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 29

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Presentations to Kristen Schreder in appreciation of her service as a member of the City Council for the City of Redding.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 2H
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2H--Presentations to Kristen Schreder in appreciation of her service as a City Council Member for the City of Redding.

Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 30

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Presentations to Erin D. Resner in appreciation of her service as a member of the City Council for the City of Redding.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 2I
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2I--Presentations to Erin D. Resner in appreciation of her service as a City Council Member for the City of Redding.

Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 31

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept City of Redding Accounts Payable Register No. 9; and Payroll Register No. 10.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact to accepting the registers.

Alternative Action

The City Council could choose to not accept the registers and provide direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

Attached are the Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers as follows:

Accounts Payable:
(1) Register Number 9 for the period November 1, 2022 – November 11, 2022, in the amount of $5,394,373.01.

Payroll:
(1) Register Number 10 for the period October 30, 2022 –November 12, 2022, in the amount of $4,271,697,68.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)--City of Redding Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers.

Allyn Feci Clark, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 32
Report to Redding City Council November 22, 2022
Re: 4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers Page 2

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 Packet Pg. 33

CITY OF REDDING

SUMMARY OF DEMAND REGISTERS

FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
ON
December 6, 2022
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:

I -�
5,394,373.01 I

4.211.697.68 I
$9,666,070.69
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) FIAP030R
F205025000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

CITY OF REDDING

REFERENCE PAYEE

PAID BY CHECK
992472 JOHNSTON LEENA
992477 STURROCK LAUREN
992483 BENTING CANDACE
992484 BALL GARRETT
992492 GOVEA ISAAC
992493 RADOKEVIC BOSKO
992494 FERNALLD JUSTICE
992513 LERMA SOPHIA
992520 DILLION DION
992521 GRONCKI CALEB
992528 YANG WREN
992532 CULMER ANDREW
992538 MOLACEK DREW
992559 PROGETTA CONSULTING
992564 RODRIGUEZ TERESA
992568 MILLER MICHAEL
70806 QUALITY INSULATION FABRICATORS INC
74134 BLOCK 7 DOWNTOWN INVESTORS, LP
993540 BENNETT PEARL
49617 SIGNARAMA
7030 AT&T
20652 WOZNICA REGINA
22846 STREEBY JOHN MARTIN
38276 VERTEX BUSINESS SERVICES
42706 GRAY CHRISTENA
63463 AIRESPRING INC
70775 ARCHIVESOCIAL
72026 SSP INNOVATIONS LLC
73075 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC
73389 SHIELD REGIONAL TRAINING CONSORTIUM
73562 CIVICPLUS LLC
74495 BLOCK 7 RETAIL INVESTORS, LLC
993548 ALCARAZ BREEZZY
993581 ALEMAN MIGUEL
993582 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
4421541 CHABOLLA DANIELLE M
4423519 HOLLEMAN AARON
4427974 STAUP CHRISTOPHER
5112287 CALDWELL JONATHAN
5553812 INGELS JACOB
8521170 CANDELARIA-HUTSON KAMRYN
8521171 CAMPBELL KELLY
8521949 CASNER LISA
8523859 HASTINGS KYLE
8525727 MYERS RICHARD
8527502 ROSSOW NICHOLAS
8530462 ERIC BAINBRIDGE
8530475 BRYANT CHRISTOPHER
8530608 BABER ROBERT
8531083 BULLARD DAVID L
8531140 CALLEGARI FIERO
8531505 CRACKEL THOMAS
8533516 HAMILTON DUSTIN
8534298 JOHNDROW RYAN
8535729 MYERS DONALD
8535849 MILLER TRAVIS
8536378 ORNER TRAVIS
8536721 PEARSON CHARLES
8536992 REED KENNETH
8538966 VILLARREAL ANTHONY
8679144 WAYNE MARTY
63463 AIRESPRING INC
650 CITY OF ANDERSON
8800 SHASTA CO AUDITOR/CONTROLLER
16306 ANIXTER INC
35780 GREATER REDDING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

DATE OF

PAYMENT
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/03/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022

PAYMENT
NUMBER
170675
170680
170683
170684
170692
170693
170694
170831
170838
170839
170845
170849
170855
171045
171050
171054
175152
175237
175261
175315
175355
175356
175357
175358
175359
175360
175361
175362
175363
175364
175365
175366
175367
175368
175369
175370
175371
175372
175373
175374
175375
175376
175377
175378
175379
175380
175381
175382
175383
175384
175385
175386
175387
175388
175389
175390
175391
175392
175393
175394
175395
175396
175397
175398
175399
175400
DATE 11/11/2022 REGISTER 9

AMOUNT OF

PAYMENT
357.33-
201.94 -
361.70 -
132.90-
269.24 -
173.03-
156.29 -

43.58-
113.37 -

67.47-
421.30 -
185.18-
132.70-
368.73-
112.94-
315.16-
450.45-
573, 987.64-
146.87-
2, 891. 78-
1, 437.00
783.75
115.72
66, 246.69
2, 576.00
1,926.48
9,300.36
17, 894.00
2,900.22
750.00
7,200.00
573,987.64
323.00

9.00 195.93

28.79 112.56
22 .13
2,420.71
250.00
160.50
691. 75
160.50
207. 50
350.00
160.50

16.36 50.00

25.00 51.10

79.87 39.32

25.00 16.62

65.00 57.75

25.00 100.00

25.00 98.93
347.50
4, 069.95
144.35
950.00
3, 753. 75
83, 333.33
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
PAGE

IN-REGISTER

VOID AMOUNT
2,420.71-
1 20221111
12:12:38
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) FIAP030R
F205025000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

CITY OF REDDING

REFERENCE PAYEE

PAID BY CHECK
38940 MIKES BODY SHOP INC

DBA ANDERSON TOWING
43222 CORVEL CORPORATION
47404 PTS COMMUNICATIONS

PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SERVICES
53249 INLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS
57046 AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUM-

BERS LTD DBA ARIN
59046 REDDING TOURISM MARKETING GROUP
60560 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES
INC.
63949 LAW OFFICES OF SUSIE BERLIN
64601 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
73075 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC
73975 MCC ENGINEERING
74151 CASTLE TIRE DISPOSAL LLC
74392 ADK CONSULTING INC
74492 GRAVITON CONSULTING SERVICES INC
74496 MACLEOD SHERRI
990836 GRACE MANOR
993551 SANTIAGO ANITA J
993552 BAXTER STACY A
993553 TOFT BRITTANY L
993554 WIXSON TRICIA
993555 INVENTORY MANAGEMENT INC
993559 PARRISH KATIE
993560 BAKER WALTER
993561 CORCORAN PARRISH
993562 RAMIREZ MARINA
993563 EMERGENCY WATER SUPPLY
993564 ENDICOTT KATHERINE M
993565 ESTRADA SIMMON
993566 OLLER CORY D
993577 DUTRA MEGAN
4227763 SIMONSEN MARY
4440881 BOS SARAH
5019027 VOROUS LUCAS
8075972 NICKELL, JACOB
8524291 JOHNSON HOLLY
8524735 LANE CASEY
8525881 NAILS CHALECE
1572 UNITED RENTALS
1949 THATCHER COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA INC
5310 TULLIS INC
8077 INTERSTATE OIL COMPANY
12287 J F SHEA CONSTRUCTION INC
14271 REDDING FREIGHTLINER
14361 MOULES CALIFORNIA GLASS
14580 CAROLS LOCK & KEY
14904 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC
15160 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
16306 ANIXTER INC
17661 INSTRUMENT TECHNOLOGY CORP
19151 POWMAT LTD
21482 I-5 RENTALS
22625 CDW GOVERNMENT INC
22900 INDUSTRIAL WELDING
23016 WILGUS FIRE CONTROL
23099 CGI TECHNICAL SERVICES INC
25047 BIG VALLEY SEPTIC
26200 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST
26296 RESULTS RADIO
26520 CROWN MOTORS
28360 NORTH VALLEY DISTRIBUTING
30369 ENERSYS INC
30700 FEDERAL EXPRESS

DATE OF

PAYMENT

PAYMENT
NUMBER
11/03/2022 175401
11/03/2022 175402
11/03/2022 175403
11 /03/2022 175404
11/03/2022 175405
11/03/2022 175406
11/03/2022 175407
11/03/2022 175408
11/03/2022 175409
11/03/2022 175410
11/03/2022 175411
11/03/2022 175412
11/03/2022 175413
11/03/2022 175414
11/03/2022 175415
11/03/2022 175416
11/03/2022 175417
11/03/2022 175418
11/03/2022 175419
11/03/2022 175420
11/03/2022 175421
11/03/2022 175422
11/03/2022 175423
11/03/2022 175424
11/03/2022 175425
11/03/2022 175426
11/03/2022 175427
11/03/2022 175428
11/03/2022 175429
11/03/2022 175430
11/03/2022 175431
11/03/2022 175432
11/03/2022 175433
11/03/2022 175434
11/03/2022 175435
11/03/2022 175436
11/03/2022 175437
11/03/2022 175438
11/03/2022 175439
11/03/2022 175440
11/03/2022 175441
11/03/2022 175442
11/03/2022 175443
11/03/2022 175444
11/03/2022 175445
11/03/2022 175446
11/03/2022 175447
11/03/2022 175448
11/03/2022 175449
11/03/2022 175450
11/03/2022 175451
11/03/2022 175452
11/03/2022 175453
11/03/2022 175454
11/03/2022 175455
11/03/2022 175456
11/03/2022 175457
11/03/2022 175458
11/03/2022 175459
11/03/2022 175460
11/03/2022 175461
11/03/2022 175462
DATE 11/11/2022 REGISTER 9

AMOUNT OF

PAYMENT
2,994.64
852.00
453.00
4,455.56
150.00
143,415.06
2,057.82
1,820.00
727.26
11,166.59
3,177.00
12,467.05
4,520.00
2,725.73
523.85

8.75 53.98
281.16

93.09 49.02
411. 83

68.59 46.85
117.11
113. 38

79.12 137.47
144.65

71. 94
130.00

32.28 656.62
150.00
540.22
278.68
175.50
175.50
4,006.26
19,194.00
780.95
3,227.98
1,384.14
3,435.65
295.00

4.83 6,782.14
1,162.22
3,812.06
430.25
20, 378.61
1,012.20
6,038.89
2,571.72

59.52 608.50
667.86
433.45
1,002.20
286.83
5, 107.96
31,368.13
182.42
PAGE

IN-REGISTER

VOID AMOUNT
2 20221111
12:12:38
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) FIAP030R
F205025000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

CITY OF REDDING

REFERENCE PAYEE

PAID BY CHECK
31427 WCP SOLUTIONS
31968 ASNA
33621 ITRON INC
35000 GERLINGER STEEL & SUPPLY
35580 GRAINGER W W INC
38440 PEERLESS BUILDING MAINT
38483 PACIFIC WATER RESOURCES
38544 BATTERY SYSTEMS INC
41194 A - 1 SMOG AND REPAIR CENTER
41720 PETERSON POWER SYSTEMS INC

PETERSON TRACTOR-GENERATORS
41813 CAMELLIA VALLEY SUPPLY

DBA FERGUSON WATERWORKS
42690 ENTERPRISE AUTO PARTS
46597 FASTENERS INC
46600 AIRGAS
47236 ALTEC INDUSTRIES
48909 JKH DOOR SERVICE COMPANY

HENDRICKSON JAMES K
49617 SIGNARAMA
50369 CA TOWING INC
50376 ONE SOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC
52283 ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER
52490 BEST WAY UPHOLSTERY
52595 BIG TIME PEST CONTROL
53377 FLEET PRIDE
53413 GILES LOCK & SECURITY SYSTEMS INC
55541 TEHAMA TIRE SERVICE, INC.
56324 WORLD OIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
56666 FREE FIRE MEDIA INC
57291 RODOLA JOSEPH

DBA JOE RODOLA'S DEBT CONSULTING
57983 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS
58139 PACIFIC CRANE CERTIFICATION
58143 COMER COMMUNICATION
60420 POWER DRAULICS INC
61552 SHASTA LIVING STREETS
62467 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY AND SIGNS
62979 MENDES SUPPLY COMPANY INC
66020 ASSOC CALIF WATER AGENCIES
68519 PACE SUPPLY CORP
68715 HANSEN PRESSURE WASHER AND

MACHINERY LLC
70820 AXNER EXCAVATING INC
71517 HIGHWAY SPECIALTY COMPANY INC
71974 CHRIS JAEGER CONSTRUCTION & TESTING
72009 SPECTRUM REACH
72087 NORCAL PRESORT AND PRINTING
72468 TYNDALE COMPANY
72804 C & A RUBBER STAMPS & SIGNS
72905 AFFORDABLE INTERIOR SYSTEMS, INC
73150 PLATINUM AUTO GLASS
73252 PACIFIC ECORISK
73282 BRIGHTS ENGRAVING AND TROPHY LLC
73582 DOWN RANGE INDOOR TRAINING CENTER
73709 STEPHENS MEDIA GROUP
73751 BDI - M&S REDDING
74014 ENDRESS + HAUSER INC

C/O RUST AUTOMATION & CONTROLS INC
74219 EMERGENCY VEHICLE OUTFITTING CO LLC
74356 WEST COAST ENERGY SYSTEMS LLC
74419 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS
74475 BOAT LOCKER
77020 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
80180 SHASTA WELDING SUPPLY INC
1090 CA STATE-DEPT OF TRANS

DATE OF

PAYMENT

PAYMENT
NUMBER
11/03/2022 175463
11/03/2022 175464
11/03/2022 175465
11/03/2022 175466
11/03/2022 175467
11/03/2022 175468
11/03/2022 175469
11/03/2022 175470
11/03/2022 175471
11/03/2022 175472
11/03/2022 175473
11/03/2022 175474
11/03/2022 175475
11/03/2022 175476
11/03/2022 175477
11/03/2022 175478
11/03/2022 175479
11/03/2022 175480
11/03/2022 175481
11/03/2022 175482
11/03/2022 175483
11/03/2022 175484
11/03/2022 175485
11/03/2022 175486
11/03/2022 175487
11/03/2022 175488
11/03/2022 175489
11/03/2022 175490
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/08/2022
175491
175492
175493
175494
175495
175496
175497
175498
175499
175500
175501
175502
175503
175504
175505
175506
175507
175508
175509
175510
175511
175512
175513
175514
175515
175516
175517
175518
175519
175520
175521
175522
DATE 11/11/2022 REGISTER 9

AMOUNT OF

PAYMENT
9, 059.14
3,85 0.00
300.00
954.03
2, 606.65
450.00
1, 417.25
140.21
392.25
16, 101. 12
23, 287.41
2, 902. 17
2, 616.12
1,441.11
477.75
797.22
834.68
525.00
11, 450.47
3, 030.00
125.63
350.00
4, 437.78

6.01 9, 790.95
165.00
550.00
100.00
1, 694.68
2, 150.00
2, 472.87
1, 031. 87
400.00
706.32
776.17
28, 930.00
4, 331.14
546.44
1, 761.71
7, 890.00
12, 350.00
2, 477.00
10, 776.32
100.98
17 .21
l, 889.31
623.06
3, 030.04

18.50 2,584.12
1, 000.00
1, 749.98
17, 348.30
7, 568.96
3, 108.21
359.00
13, 398.00

53.42 219.48
49, 117.12
PAGE

IN-REGISTER

VOID AMOUNT
3 20221111
12:12:38
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) FIAP030R
F205025000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

CITY OF REDDING

REFERENCE PAYEE

PAID BY CHECK
2189 COM-PAIR SERVICES
5016 CENTERVILLE COMM SVC DIST
11529 ENPLAN
13117 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE
17180 BELLA VISTA WATER DISTRICT
36432 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
38874 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

OFFICE OF OPERATOR CERTIFICATION
38874 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

OFFICE OF OPERATOR CERTIFICATION
55348 WAIT ROOFING & SEAMLESS GUTTER INC
57652 SIERRA-SACRAMENTO VALLEY EMS AGENCY
60136 AT&T
72268 MAIRE & DEEDON, A LAW CORPORATION
72502 FUQUA EVERYDAY FITNESS INC

EVERYDAY FITNESS
73306 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH
LLP
73387 WEX BANK
74341 SAN BERNARDINO REGIONAL EMERGENCY T
74477 TREMAINE & ASSOCIATES INC
83860 CLEAR CREEK COMM SERV DIST
993587 BULLINS CHRISTOPHER
993588 TIPP ERICKA
993589 WASTE MANAGEMENT NATIONAL ACCT
993590 COLE GREGORY
993591 GROFF DIANA
993592 MARTIN JOSEPH
993593 VIP CARE
993594 TOWERY TAYLOR
993595 KEENAN TAYLOR
993596 KESSLER HEATHER
993597 GATLEY MELISSA
993598 OROURKE RONAN
993599 CREDIFORD ASHLEY
993600 PETERSEN CLAIRE
993601 DICKERSON CATHY
993602 HAVSTAD JAN
993603 FORT NICOLE
993604 CARTER ELECTRIC
998842 PERMIT PULLERS
998842 PERMIT PULLERS
998995 WALLNER PLUMBING CO
4423519 HOLLEMAN AARON
4430486 BRAUD TRAVIS
4614678 KREIDER CULLEN
4617001 SUMERLIN JAY
4620372 ATKINS ANDREW
4622618 FOOTT KYLE
4626719 PETERS CHRIS
5520366 ARMSTRONG JOHNATHAN
6108026 ROBERTSON JARRET
8530475 BRYANT CHRISTOPHER
8638502 TONA CONRAD
8899783 YOUNG KEVIN
5016 CENTERVILLE COMM SVC DIST
6030 NORTH STATE SECURITY INC
12287 J F SHEA CONSTRUCTION INC
14690 SHASTA CO HEALTH DEPT
23262 CLARK ALLYN F CITY TREASURER
23430 CARRELS OFFICE MACHINES
29347 RESOURCES FOR RURAL COMM DEV
29347 RESOURCES FOR RURAL COMM DEV
29347 RESOURCES FOR RURAL COMM DEV

DATE OF

PAYMENT

PAYMENT
NUMBER
11/08/2022 175523
11/08/2022 175524
11/08/2022 175525
11/08/2022 175526
11/08/2022 175527
11/08/2022 175528
11/08/2022 175529
11/08/2022 175530
11/08/2022 175531
11/08/2022 175532
11/08/2022 175533
11/08/2022 175534
11/08/2022 175535
11/08/2022 175536
11/D8/2022 175537
11/08/2022 175538
11/08/2022 175539
11/08/2022 175540
11/08/2022 175541
11/08/2022 175542
11/08/2022 175543
11/08/2022 175544
11/08/2022 175545
11/08/2022 175546
11/08/2022 175547
11/08/2022 175548
11/08/2022 175549
11/08/2022 175550
11/08/2022 175551
11/08/2022 175552
11/08/2022 175553
11/08/2022 175554
11/08/2022 175555
11/08/2022 175556
11/08/2022 175557
11/08/2022 175558
11/08/2022 175559
11/08/2022 175560
11/08/2022 175561
11/08/2022 175562
11/08/2022 175563
11/08/2022 175564
11/08/2022 175565
11/08/2022 175566
11/08/2022 175567
11/08/2022 175568
11/08/2022 175569
11/08/2022 175570
11/08/2022 175571
11/08/2022 175572
11/08/2022 175573
11/08/2022 175574
11/10/2022 175575
11/10/2022 175576
11/10/2022 175577
11/10/2022 175578
11/10/2022 175579
11/10/2022 175580
11/10/2022 175581
11/10/2022 175582
11/10/2022 175583
DATE 11/11/2022 REGISTER 9

AMOUNT OF

PAYMENT
225_00
262.39
6,646.25
1,024.00
188.48
1,802.41
150.00
150.00
150.00
212. 9 6
100.00

32.40 5,901.50
850.00
1,721.00
1,098. 31
1,475.00
8,124.36
170.79
531. 49
145.52
125.89

16.05 92.81
574.46
224. 72
238.41
153.06
133.83
890.12
493.73
100.01
370.92
276.56
379.33
780.50

90.28 90.28

90.28 71. 48
172. so
8,800.00
903.05
477.37

86.00 416.00
260.50
225.21
250.00
244. 34
401.00
214.49

39.05 26,673.69
217,455.10

92. 00
125.00
105.35
32,799.10
171,574.80
8,383.50
PAGE

IN - REGISTER

VOID AMOUNT
4 20221111
12:12:38
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) FIAP030R
F205025000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

CITY OF REDDING

REFERENCE

PAID BY CHECK
30349 EDM
PAYEE
31105 TURTLE BAY EXPLORATION PARK
36432 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
42772 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
43222 CORVEL CORPORATION
47654 WORKTERRA
55656 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MANAGEMENT INC
72268 MAIRE & DEEDON, A LAW CORPORATION
72358 EXCELLENT HOME IMPROVEMENT
72541 CALL2RECYCLE INC.
72676 DOT FHWA
72911 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL
72964 GHD INC
73306 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH
LLP
74351 ARCHER ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC
74379 GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES INC
74502 SHASTA COUNTY ARSON COMMITTEE
990087 CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANK
990538 BARBER CYNTHIA
993613 WEINSTEIN AURA
993618 5716 42ND STREET LLC
993678 WILLIAMS DAVE

D & A CONSTRUCTION
993679 MUECK MICHAEL
4327898 SMULL MICHAEL
4329323 WHITEHEAD MARTIN
4329529 WILSON NOLAN
4425031 LOVELADY KYLE
4428956 VEGA DUSTIN
5112287 CALDWELL JONATHAN
6100385 ABREAU BRANDON
6415966 NIEMER KIMBERLY
8521601 DAY JUSTIN
8619146 WATKINS JOSHUA
130 TWIN VIEW TOWING
2220 SABAH INTERNATIONAL INC
3945 COSTCO WHOLESALE
5310 TULLIS INC
8077 INTERSTATE OIL COMPANY
8780 ENTERPRISE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DIST
11549 CRANE EQUIP MFG CO
14271 REDDING FREIGHTLINER
14580 CAROLS LOCK & KEY
14904 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC
15160 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
18150 BORGES & MAHONEY INC
21482 I-5 RENTALS
22625 CDW GOVERNMENT INC
22900 INDUSTRIAL WELDING
26117 NORTHSTATE PUBLIC RADIO
26296 RESULTS RADIO
26520 CROWN MOTORS
26600 L N CURTIS & SONS
28360 NORTH VALLEY DISTRIBUTING
29020 DURA CRANE INC
29672 WESTERN RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION

INFORMATION SYSTEM
30369 ENERSYS INC
30700 FEDERAL EXPRESS
31427 WCP SOLUTIONS
33591 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
35000 GERLINGER STEEL & SUPPLY
36867 GUY RENTS INC
37334 QUALITY SAW AND MOWER
37770 MISSION LINEN & UNIFORM

DATE OF

PAYMENT

PAYMENT
NUMBER
11/10/2022 175584
11/10/2022 175585
11/10/2022 175586
11/10/2022 175587
11/10/2022 175588
11/10/2022 175589
11/10/2022 175590
11/10/2022 175591
11/10/2022 175592
11/10/2022 175593
11/10/2022 175594
11/10/2022 175595
11/10/2022 175596
11/10/2022 175597
11/10/2022 175598
11/10/2022 175599
11/10/2022 175600
11/10/2022 175601
11/10/2022 175602
11/10/2022 175603
11/10/2022 175604
11/10/2022 175605
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
175606
175607
175608
175609
175610
175611
175612
175613
175614
175615
175616
175617
175618
175619
175620
175621
175622
175623
175624
175625
175626
175627
175628
175629
175630
175631
175632
175633
175634
175635
175636
175637
175638
175639
175640
175641
175642
175643
175644
175645
175646
DATE 11/11/2022 REGISTER 9

AMOUNT OF

PAYMENT
1, 726.50
3, 705.69
1, 153.96
1, 202.00
9, 400.90
10,861.00
151.50
29, 495.73
24, 262.30
3, 396. 05
6, 000.00
1, 284.50
88, 297.90
10, 260. 00
39, 812.50
54, 832.01

25.00 50, 000. 00

11. 26
100.00
101. 00
3, 390.24
550.00
789.50
559.50
379.50
379.50

5.63 1, 915.66
250.00
160.81
1,543.71
125.75
680.00
1, 236. 00
2, 009.79
8, 522. 88
4, 686.49
600.00
88, 527.35
14, 415.91
987.08
2, 582.50
8, 637.72
3, 593.83
4, 684.10
6, 649.00
4, 782.32
600.00
1, 007.64
46, 442.94
36, 212.33
9, 019.65
1, 161.00
218.00
2, 248.31
108.32
2, 444.35
623.92
556.71
2, 372.22
703.01
4, 579.34
PAGE

IN - REGISTER

VOID AMOUNT
5 20221111
12:12:38
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) FIAP030R
F205025000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

CITY OF REDDING

REFERENCE PAYEE

PAID BY CHECK
38440 PEERLESS BUILDING MAINT
38544 BATTERY SYSTEMS INC
39214 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
41194 A-1 SMOG AND REPAIR CENTER
41813 CAMELLIA VALLEY SUPPLY

DBA FERGUSON WATERWORKS
42690 ENTERPRISE AUTO PARTS
46597 FASTENERS INC
46600 AIRGAS
50969 IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT
51173 INTERSPIRO INC
51876 SUEZ WTS SERVICES USA INC
52026 NORCAL TRUCKS INC

DBA NORCAL KENWORTH-ANDERSON
52283 ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER
52595 BIG TIME PEST CONTROL
53340 RIVERVIEW INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS
53377 FLEET PRIDE
54357 KUBWATER RESOURCES
55541 TEHAMA TIRE SERVICE, INC.
57983 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS
60420 POWER DRAULICS INC
62399 NOR CAL RENTALS AND SALES INC
62467 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY AND SIGNS
62979 MENDES SUPPLY COMPANY INC
63160 LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY
63686 FLO-LINE TECHNOLOGY INC
64206 WCP ENVELOPE LLC
65281 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC
65840 SST OIL INC/AUTOGAS
65938 IML NORTH AMERICA LLC
66086 TRANSUNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE

DATA SOLUTIONS INC
68519 PACE SUPPLY CORP
70820 AXNER EXCAVATING INC
71517 HIGHWAY SPECIALTY COMPANY INC
72087 NORCAL PRESORT AND PRINTING
72339 MCENTIRE LANDSCAPING, INC
72381 BMH EQUIPMENT INC
72576 CALIFORNIA SAFETY COMPANY INC
72883 BRYANT AUTOMOTIVE, INC
72997 THE DEEP
73150 PLATINUM AUTO GLASS
73281 GARDEN EQUIPPED
73709 STEPHENS MEDIA GROUP
73746 MCGHEE AND ASSOCIATES
73761 LOUCKS LANDSCAPE SUPPLY
73770 STROUPS CHAIN SAW
73915 DOBBS PETERBILT
74113 SITMATIC

C/O CALIBER OFFICE FURNITURE
74267 AMERICAN TRUCK & AUTO BODY SHOP LLC
74426 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC
80180 SHASTA WELDING SUPPLY INC
81660 MT SHASTA SPRING WATER CO
87870 DOWNTOWN FORD SALES
97890 DIESEL EMISSIONS SERVICE

CHECK TOTALS NET CASH DECREASE - CHECKS

PAID BY ACH TRANSFER
43222 CORVEL CORPORATION
43222 CORVEL CORPORATION
43222 CORVEL CORPORATION

DATE OF

PAYMENT
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022

PAYMENT
NUMBER
175647
175648
175649
175650
175651
11/10/2022 175652
11/10/2022 175653
11/10/2022 175654
11/10/2022 175655
11/10/2022 175656
11/10/2022 175657
11/10/2022 175658
11/10/2022 175659
11/10/2022 175660
11/10/2022 175661
11/10/2022 175662
11/10/2022 175663
11/10/2022 175664
11/10/2022 175665
11/10/2022 175666
11/10/2022 175667
11/10/2022 175668
11/ 10/2022 175669
11/ 10/2022 175670
11/10/2022 175671
11/10/2022 175672
11/10/2022 175673
11/10/2022 175674
11/10/2022 175675
11/10/2022 175676
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/ 10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/ 10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
2, 447, 061.90
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
175677
175678
175679
175680
175681
175682
175683
175684
175685
175686
175687
175688
175689
175690
175691
175692
175693
175694
175695
175696
175697
175698
175699
18992
18993
18994
DATE 11/ 11/2022 REGISTER 9

AMOUNT OF

PAYMENT
1, 131.74
2, 928.94

3.76 50.25
4, 681.95
1,483.33
6, 551.33
1, 910. 75
3, 018.36
3, 463.08
1, 857.86
2, 447.75
4, 025.00
283.00
138, 650.53
1, 041.43
12, 669.05
29, 300.91
1, 524.01
814.27
17, 753.66

48.62 2, 072.37
5, 276.70
2, 939.33
3, 239.38
6, 430.80
145, 234.97
362.79
.80
156.24
1,387.55
10, 550.00
11, 096.01
168.80
1, 620.00
250.00
531.21
198.65
960.75

51. 35
500.00
483.74
950.15
2, 769.41
4,872.08
493.99
5, 590.38
22, 795.95
1, 129.29
791. 39
76, 780.74
495. 08
* * * * * * * *
2, 449, 482.61
28, 063.95
14, 473.94
660.00
PAGE

IN-REGISTER

VOID AMOUNT
****** **
2, 420.71-
6 20221111
12:12:38
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) FIAP030R
F205025000 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

CITY OF REDDING

REFERENCE PAYEE

PAID BY ACH TRANSFER
43222 CORVEL CORPORATION
47654 WORKTERRA
57150 PACE ENGINEERING INC
73605 JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
70699 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC
73614 MCALLISTER CELESTINE L
74462 HOBBS AUDREY
8522740 GALE TONIA
26281 VERIZON WIRELESS
73138 WIRELESS WATCHDOGS, LLC
514 DUNCAN WEINBERG GENZER PEMBROKE PC
72961 FANEUIL INC
74292 BENEFIT COORDINATORS CORPORATION
(BCC)
60143 AUTOMATED ENERGY, INC.
31326 CEAR INC
43222 CORVEL CORPORATION
43222 CORVEL CORPORATION
43914 WATER WORKS ENGINEERS LLC
46198 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICES LLC
47462 STOLL ENGINEERING
47462 STOLL ENGINEERING
65813 CERVANIA THOMAS
73557 MASON BENTLEY
73614 MCALLISTER CELESTINE L
74467 FRANDSEN CHRISTINA
40944 SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DIST
46198 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICES LLC
52136 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US) LP
55522 BANC
55522 BANC
68771 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP
73412 GRANICUS, LLC

ACH TOTALS NET CASH DECREASE - ACH

PAID BY WIRE TRANSFER
993548 ALCARAZ BREEZZY
2100 CA STATE-PERS
993571 BREMER RITA
993572 RODRIGUEZ ANNA
993573 CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER

BRENDEN OJALA
993574 GORMAN AUTHUR
993579 COONCE ARIANA L
993579 COONCE ARIANA L
993570 MASON DANIELLE
993577 DUTRA MEGAN
993578 HALL ANNE
996726 BAILEY MARISSA
999086 GODDARD HANNAH
992628 MILLER RACHEL
993584 BARNES BREC
33116 U S BANK

WIRE TOTALS NET CASH DECREASE - WIRE

DATE OF

PAYMENT
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/01/2022
11/02/2022
11/02/2022
11/02/2022
11/02/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/04/2022
11/04/2022
11/04/2022
11/07/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
2, 300, 957.40
11/01/2022
11/02/2022
11/02/2022
11/02/2022
11/02/2022
11/02/2022
11/02/2022
11/02/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/03/2022
11/08/2022
11/08/2022
11/10/2022
646, 353.71

PAYMENT
NUMBER
18995
18996
18997
18998
18999
19000
19001
19002
19003
19004
19005
19006
19007
19008
19009
19010
19011
19012
19013
19014
19015
19016
19017
19018
19019
19020
19021
19022
19023
19024
19025
19026
11946
11948
11949
11950
11951
11952
11953
11954
11955
11956
11957
11958
11959
11960
11961
11962
DATE 11/11/2022 REGISTER 9

AMOUNT OF

PAYMENT
3, 604.29
1, 706, 879.29
13, 885.00
19, 956.98
20, 724.25
560.00
660.00
243.50
237.50
1, 678.40
1, 661.50
77, 872.66
28, 186.73
455.00
3, 876. 41
16, 636. 95
5, 625.00
19, 678.67
165, 440.26
1, 200.00
4, 080.00
1, 340.00
137.14
420.00

90.00 98,611.00
547.92
28, 050.00
5, 261.26
4, 060.00
11, 834.56
14, 265.24
****"'***
2, 300, 957.40
323.00- VOID
641, 233.94

45.00 125.00
350.00
350.00
437.54
437.54

47.00 89.00
289.69

73.00 125.00
185.00

89.00 2, 800.00
********
646, 353.71
PAGE 7

IN-REGISTER

VOID AMOUNT
****** **
20221111
12:12:38
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) FIAP030R
F205025000

CITY OF REDDING

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

REFERENCE PAYEE

DATE OF

PAYMENT
REGISTER TOTALS NET CASH DECREASE - REGISTER 5,394,373.01 AUTHORIZED BY:

DIRECTOR OF FINANCE

PAYMENT
NUMBER
DATE 11/11/2022 REGISTER 9
20221111
12:12:38

AMOUNT OF

PAYMENT
PAGE

IN-REGISTER

VOID AMOUNT
8 * * * * * **** ** **
5,396,793.72 2,420.71-

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS

DULY APPROVED AT A MEETING OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REDDING HELD ON ��

CITY CLERK DATE
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
401
401
401
401
401
402
402
402
402
402
411
411
41 1
411
411
421
421
421
422
422
422
422
424
424
424
424
424
424
42 4
425
425
42 5
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
425
428
428
428
429
429
429
429
429
429
429
429
431
431
431
431
431
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
432
PAYEE
182 2 M P
524 7 M B
7053 E D
7831 K G
9334 J L
4596 S L
5554 P K
7684 A L
79 58 C L
9767 K C
61 3 S H
1716 S L
2762 J A
8479 B W
9640 C K
153 9 J M
2747 K R
7366 S M
595 J R
17 02 BE
5023 S E
7763 M J
187 5 S A
2054 A S
2185 W H
28 97 J B
507 9 A L
7613 A R
81 63 S L
888 T M
1317 A F
303 6 E C
38 35 D A
38 74 J R
524 8 K R
527 7 T D
6999 K L
7357 K A
742 2 G S
8203 A H
928 9 T M
9779 M J
267 M M
23 86 A L
2627 S N
46 0 T L
1587 M L
32 10 D E
4147 J A
5776 K S
587 2 H M
6447 J R
8193 E A
939 R C
3873 J D
5035 E J
67 54 D P
932 3 M E
1542 N R
1552 C A
1840 B J
3102 B J
4069 S E
489 0 T R
7028 K J
789 4 J c
7898 M J
8251 G T
CITY OF REDDING 11 :42:14 11/16/ 22
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/1 2/22 REGISTER 10

DACQUISTO

MEZZANO
RESNER

SCHREDER
WINTER
TIPTON
MIZE

DALPOGGETTO
SIMS

YELL-MYERS
BADE

DEMAAGD

GALBRAITH
TIPPIN

WOODSTROM

CARLISLE
OILAR
RILEY

BALDWIN
DEWALT
LOVITT

SIMONSEN

DRESSLER
CLARK
EDDINS
GIBBS
LAKE

SANBORN
SIGNOR

BOUCHER
CLARK

GRANNIS
IVEY
HALL

MON CHAMP
MANN

RAUDMAN

SPRAGUE

ROBINETT

SCHANUTH

WA YD A
YOUNGS

KEMP LEY

EDENBURN

FRO EBER
BIRCH
TRUMAN

HACKWORTH
GRIMES

MARTINEZ

MCMURTREY
PALMER

LENSING
BROWN

HOLLYMAN
LOPEZ

PHILLIPS

WHITEHEAD
CLUVER

CARLSON
DIXON

GRIFFIN

HIBBARD

LAWRENZ
PIERCY
SILVA
SMULL

SULLIVAN

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
625 .0 0
600.00
600 .0 0
625 .0 0
625 .0 0
3,73 7.60
5,110 .5 2
1,9 95 .2 2
2,272 .8 0
2,164 .8 0
7,264.70
8,2 37 .6 0
4,908 .0 9
10,47 9.1 0
3, 016 .8 0
2,634 .4 0
2,8 91 .2 0
2,116 .8 8
6, 31 4 .4 0
9,5 11 .1 2
2,910 .4 0
2,910 .4 0
3, 053 .6 1
2,44 0.8 0
2,440 .8 0
2,440. 80
787 .2 0
2,716 .8 0
3,11 5.2 0
3,689 .6 0
6,89 3.8 0
2,1 23 .0 8
2,402 .4 4
2,634 .4 1
932 .9 6
4,195 .2 0
2,116 .8 0
3,19 5 .1 0
5,253 .6 0
4,19 5 .2 0
1,920 .0 0
3,0 35 .2 0
3,234 .4 0
4,168 .8 0
2,888 .0 0
2,2 82 .9 0
3,40 5 .7 0
57 0.5 9
1,8 82 .3 0
4,8 84 .0 0
2,3 35. 30
3, 436 .0 0
2,3 35 .2 8
2,587. 20
1,668 .4 5
2,716 .8 0
4,1 88 .8 0
2,9 40 .0 3
1, 66 5.6 0
2,7 41.6 6
2,6 66 .4 3
2,825 .6 0
3,611 .2 0
2,218 .4 0
908 .0 0
4,170 .4 1
3,11 5.2 0
2,804 .7 4

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
220.6 6
19 2.7 0
55 .9 0
18 9.6 4
51 .8 1
1,1 66 .1 4
2,059 .0 1
446 .4 8
430. 84
598 .2 5
2,4 64.1 5
3,9 06 .8 6
1,290 .0 6
5,29 1.6 8
71 9.6 5
937 .7 4
1,065 .9 3
61 5. 91
3, 69 2.9 7
4,016 .3 8
97 2 . 32
900.6 2
938 . 32
63 8.3 3
661.0 4
66 0.3 8
72 .4 2
681. 96
807 .5 4
1, 180.60
2,123 .0 6
786 .9 3
666 .2 4
791 .6 7
94 .5 8
1,6 46 .7 3
76 5.4 9
91 9.41
1,058 .0 0
1,350 .8 2
31 5.9 7
709 .1 0
89 5.5 7
1,599 . 13
79 2.33
854 .9 8
1,007 .8 3
40 .5 2
47 1.0 2
1,604 .5 6
44 0.5 2
1,672 .8 6
625.8 5
833 .5 8
48 0.7 6
921 .41
1,502 .1 0
691 .9 6
49 4 .9 9
630 .0 8
1,290 .9 6
66 0.4 0
950.8 6
69 5.6 4
124 .3 5
1,4 94 .1 9
84 9. 46
779 .31
11/ 12/22 572035
11/ 12/22 572 036
11/ 12/22 572 03 7
11/1 2/22 572 03 8
11/1 2/22 572 03 9
11/ 12/22 572040
11/ 12/22 57204 1
11/ 12/22 572042
11/ 12/22 57204 3
11/ 12/22 572044
11/1 2/22 572045
11/1 2/22 57204 6
11/ 12/22 57204 7
11/ 12/22 57204 8
11/1 2/22 572 04 9
11/ 12/22 57 2050
11/1 2/22 572051
11/ 12/22 572052
11/1 2/22 572053
11/1 2/22 572054
11/ 12/22 572 055
11/ 12/22 572056
11/ 12/22 572057
11/ 12/22 572058
11/ 12/22 572059
11/1 2/22 572060
11/1 2/22 572 061
11/ 12/22 572062
11/ 12/22 572 063
11/12/22 572064
11/ 12/22 572065
11/1 2/2 2 572 066
11/ 12/22 572 067
11/1 2/22 572 068
11/1 2/22 572 069
11/ 12/22 572070
11/ 12/2 2 572 071
11/ 12/2 2 572072
11/1 2/22 572073
11/1 2/22 572074
11/ 12/22 572075
11/ 12/2 2 572 076
11/1 2/22 572 077
11/1 2/2 2 572 078
11/ 12/22 572 079
11/ 12/22 572080
11/ 12/22 57208 1
11/ 12/22 572082
11/ 12/2 2 572 083
11/1 2/22 572 084
11/1 2/22 572085
11/ 12/22 572 086
11/ 12/22 572 087
11/ 12/2 2 572 088
11/ 12/2 2 572 089
11/1 2/2 2 572090
11/1 2/22 572 091
11/ 12/22 572092
11/ 12/22 572 093
11/1 2/22 572 094
11/1 2/22 572095
11/ 12/22 5720 96
11/ 12/22 572 097
11/1 2/22 572 098
11/ 12/2 2 572 099
11/ 12/22 5721 00
11/1 2/22 572101
11/ 12/2 2 572102
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
404 . 34
407 .3 0
544 .1 0
435.36
573 .1 9
2,571.46
3,0 51 .5 1
1,54 8.7 4
1,84 1.9 6
1,566 .55
4,8 00.55
4,3 30.7 4
3,618 .0 3
5,18 7.4 2
2,29 7.1 5
1, 696 .6 6
1, 825 .2 7
1,500 .9 7
2, 621 .43
5, 49 4 . 74
1, 938 .0 8
2,009 .7 8
2,115 .2 9
1,80 2.47
1,779 .7 6
l, 780 .4 2
714 .7 8
2,034. 84
2, 307 .6 6
2, 509. 00
4,77 0 .7 4
1,336 .1 5
1,73 6.2 0
1, 842 .7 4
838 .3 8
2,54 8.4 7
1,351 .31
2,275 .6 9
4,195 .6 0
2,844 .38
1,604 .0 3
2,32 6 .1 0
2,3 38.8 3
2,56 9.6 7
2,095 .6 7
1,427 .9 2
2,3 97 .8 7
530 .0 7
1,4 11.2 8
3, 27 9. 44
1,8 94 .7 8
1,7 63 .1 4
1,7 09 .4 3
1,753 .6 2
1,18 7.6 9
1,79 5 .39
2,686 .7 0
2,24 8. 07
1,170 .6 1
2,1 11.5 8
1,3 75 .4 7
2,165 .2 0
2,660 .3 4
1,522 .7 6
783 .6 5
2, 676 .2 2
2,265 .7 4
2,025 .4 3
l
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
432
432
432
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
434
438
438
438
441
441
441
441
441
441
441
441
441
441
441
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
PAYEE
9131 R L
9529 N A
9847 J A
1029 L S
1571 D J
2741 J R
4691 v s
5160 T R
5187 c J
5230 D H
5314 K D
6436 J M
7814 E
8521 L L
2041 D V
4526 s p
6828 T A
653 B T
1652 M R
1891 M M
2181 R J
2288 C M
5217 L C
6740 R C
7669 W M
7671 J D
7733 J c
7881 C G
377 D H
422 H C
427 s J
457 M N
586 AN
815 J
113 9 M R
1377 B W
1463 B J
1527 M D
1530 B G
1541 D M
1559 E L
1564 Z L
1566 J p
1570 A
1604 B A
1693 J H
1697 T S
1715 MR
1836 A C
1948 K I
2050 N E
2228 A E
2292 J D
2516 B N
2519 J D
2671 K A
2674 R S
2909 E T
2912 J J
2913 P M
3020 K C
3023 J J
3026 E E
3030 J w
3092 C F
3356 L K
3519 A B
3602 J A
CITY OF REDDING 11:42:14 11/16/22
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12/22 REGISTER 10 WARNER
WILSON
ZENO
BURKE
CASTRO
GANNON

KRISHNAN

LIGHTLE

MARTINUSEN
MORGAN
MANUEL
PAGAN
WITTS
TOY

DREWETT

KINCAID
PUTT
BARNER
DAVIS
DOTSON
ELLIS

CARDOZA

MACSWEEN

PETERSON

SCHUELLER

SCHMIDT

SHELDON

SMYRNOS
ADAMS

AUKLAND
BIAS

BEDWELL
BYAN
BLAND

CALDWELL
COLE
COWAN
BRUCE

CASSELMAN

CHABOLLA
COTTEN

CREPPELL

CHRISTIANSEN

BURRUEL

CRUMRINE

DEMPSEY
DENHAM

DIMATTEO
DAHNKE

CORRIGAN
DALBY
DIAZ
DORMER
FISH
FERRIN
FREEZE
FRANK

GILMETTE

GALLEGOS
GELLIS

HOGLUND
GROVES

HARTMAN

GUTERDING
GROSS

HERREID

HOLLEMON
HEBERT

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
1,928.80
3,799.20
2,539.20
487.71
2,301.60
1,995.20
4,128.80
2,773.60
3,084.04
1,907.20
1,164.46
6,833.60
3,514.40
5,672.80
3,386.40
4,460.00
4,209.60
8,582.20
3,689.60
2,546.40
5,951.00
1,824.80
1,361.40
129,141.77
9,430.62
6,591.00
6,310.20
7,706.20
3,431.50
2,987.66
14' 601. 54
1,170.00
2,421.38
5,683.70
7,811.66
8,581.40
5,793.14
7,290.37
3,406.20
4,248.24
2,582.06
405.00
4,119.45
450.00
2,694.94
4,723.07
5,942.52
6,007.00
3,427.78
5,978.28
6,271.24
2,511.20
4,934.31
2,197.82
7,281.03
2,094.62
6,483.37
5,437.20
4,523.49

86.63 3,405.60
532.50
3,293.20
3,403.65
5,401.37
3,594.12
5,867.00
7,120.90

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
545.82
840.45
506.12

12.43 552.08
543.56
1,133.39
821.28
853.09
483.13
134.40
2,733.60
1,136.74
2,331.60
1,084.80
1,722.69
923.84
4,555.93
1,448.29
943.65
2,699.63
546.07
257.37
99,304.95
4,948.07
3,072.25
2,989.52
2,878.38
1,074.72
1,059.28
5,004.66
182.94
644.49
2,545.03
3,203.35
3,910.78
2,004.66
2,775.76
1,171.41
1,314.68
671.08

30.98 1,384.19

34.43 821. 23
1,762.57
2,117.57
2,750.02
1,289.38
1,850.21
1,718.72
648.68
1, 111. 77
613.30
3,278.71
540. 75
2,092.22
2,338.85
1,318.74

6.63 1,650.59

44.18 1,111.85
1,291.47
2,258.52
838.69
3,379.73
2,637.67
11/12/22 572103
11/12/22 572104
11/12/22 572105
11/12/22 572106
11/12/22 572107
11/12/22 572108
11/12/22 572109
11/12/22 572110
11/12/22 572111
11/12/22 572112
11/12/22 572113
11/12/22 572114
11/12/22 572115
11/12/22 572116
11/12/22 572117
11/12/22 572118
11/12/22 572119
11/12/22 572120
11/12/22 572121
11/12/22 572122
11/12/22 572123
11/12/22 572124
11/12/22 572125
11/12/22 572126
11/12/22 572127
11/12/22 572128
11/12/22 572129
11/12/22 572130
11/12/22 572131
11/12/22 572132
11/12/22 572133
11/12/22 572134
11/12/22 572135
11/12/22 572136
11/12/22 572137
11/12/22 572138
11/12/22 572139
11/12/22 572140
11/12/22 572141
11/12/22 572142
11/12/22 572143
11/12/22 572144
11/12/22 572145
11/12/22 572146
11/12/22 572147
11/12/22 572148
11/12/22 572149
11/12/22 572150
11/12/22 572151
11/12/22 572152
11/12/22 572153
11/12/22 572154
11/12/22 572155
11/12/22 572156
11/12/22 572157
11/12/22 572158
11/12/22 572159
11/12/22 572160
11/12/22 572161
11/12/22 572162
11/12/22 572163
11/12/22 572164
11/12/22 572165
11/12/22 572166
11/12/22 572167
11/12/22 572168
11/12/22 572169
11/12/22 572170
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
1,382.98
2,958.75
2,033.08
4 75. 28
1, 749.52
1,451.64
2,995.41
1,952.32
2, 230.95
1,424.07
1,030.06
4,100.00
2, 377 .66
3,341.20
2, 301.60
2, 737 .31
3,285.76
4,026.27
2,241.31
1,602.75
3,251.37
1,278.73
1,104.03
29,836.82
4,482.55
3,518.75
3,320.68
4,827.82
2,356.78
1,928.38
9,596.88
987.06
1,776.89
3,138.67
4,608.31
4,670.62
3,788.48
4,514.61
2,234.79
2,933.56
1,910.98
3 74. 02
2,735.26
415. 57
1,873.71
2,960.50
3,824.95
3,256.98
2,138.40
4,128.07
4,552.52
1,862.52
3,822.54
1,584.52
4, 002.32
1,553.87
4,391.15
3,098.35
3,204.75

80.00 1,755.01
488.32
2, 181.35
2,112.18
3,142.85
2,755.43
2,487.27
4,483.23
2 Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
PAYEE
3821 C M
3824 D M
4052 c s
4077 K F
4111 A T
41 82 R W
42 70 J A
429 7 R M
44 87 J K
46 03 c J
4712 R
4713 T D
4716 T D
4727 J R
4728 Z R
4734 S A
4738 B D
4740 A D
4808 J L
4818 T A
503 1 K G
5069 J T
5073 J M
5209 D L
5227 C A
5240 J A
5479 G L
5593 M J
55 98 C M
5609 D E
5780 R M
5789 C M
58 51 J A
6151 E E
625 7 B C
6321 B P
69 03 J
6947 0 c
702 5 N T
7051 T R
7272 J A
73 53 T E
73 58 M L
7372 C M
74 91 c J
74 97 J R
74 98 J c
7513 J B
7724 D J
7789 P D
7826 D A
7897 E F
79 02 T C
791 8 L J
7954 K C
7974 C M
79 86 J T
8035 D M
8171 T 0
8198 D M
8199 H S
82 48 E T
82 62 B T
8279 R L
8306 J
84 17 J T
8458 A M
8511 w J

CITY OF REDDING
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12 /22
HOOKS
HULL
JACOBY
HEUER
JAEGEL

JOHNSON

JOHNSON
KESSEL

KOFFORD
LUNTEY
LILES
KUYPER

LARMOUR
LANGE
LANE

LEONARD

LOBS INGER
LABBE

LANDRETH

LOVELADY
LITSEY

LENSING
MACK, JR.

MANZO
MCGANN

MEADOWS

MONTGOMERY
MILLS
MOORE

MAREADY
MANLEY

MONTOYA

NUNEZ DEL PRAD
ODELL
OMEY

PROVENCIO
RABON

REMPFER

RENAULT
RHOADS

RODGERS

SCHAFER
ROCHE

RUDDELL

ROULAND
ROSSI
RUIZ

SHEFFIELD
SLAGLE
SMETAK
SMITH
SNYDER

SO LADA
SAELEE
STAUP
STARK

STEWART

SULLIVAN

SHAHROK
SMILER
TAPAL

SARGENT
SWEEM

STIRTON
THOMAS

THOMPSON

TOWNSLEY

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
5,0 17 .0 9
6,7 57.31
189 ,8 07.36
1,0 34 .4 0
5, 127 .0 6
3,8 23 .5 6
3' 144 . 10
2,2 81 .5 2
1, 26 0.0 0
5,39 2. 76
3, 53 1.20
15 ,3 58 .3 0
5,0 48 .1 0
52 8.7 5
3, 356 .8 0
150 .0 0
6, 650 .1 8
3,8 97 .8 0
5,3 83 .5 2
655.12
6,0 99 .0 2
3, 89 6.1 7
3,8 74 .9 0
4,7 27 .0 0
528 .7 5
4, 31 5.9 8
6, 82 1.4 0
6, 911 .4 0
6, 195 .0 3
5,0 21 .1 9
4, 321 .8 5
3, 399 .4 5
686 .2 5
9,6 45.8 2
4,8 99.2 8
7,8 38 .5 6
5, 189 .0 8
10 ,1 47.1 5
5,5 03 .33
7, 37 0.2 0
5, 26 8.6 0
2, 581 .8 4
2, 200.6 5
4,4 17.8 3
4, 21 8.6 2
5,0 45.3 6
4,4 35 .0 0
4, 326 .4 2
2, 533 .8 2
6, 660 . 60
7,361.0 0
20, 05 5. 92
8, 931.5 8
7,8 87 .8 0
4, 221 .4 0
4, 51 7.5 0
4, 615 .8 0
4,6 93.6 7
6,5 35.45
4, 553 .4 0
4, 23 1.8 1
4,6 03 .8 8
2,9 87 .6 5
2, 51 1.2 0
3,5 31.2 0
3,8 38 .8 4
2,5 08 .8 6
5, 718.20

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
1, 433 .4 6
2, 491.8 9
148, 283.58
186 .2 0
1, 914 .0 0
1,35 2.1 3
977.9 4
665 .1 7
199 .1 2
2,103 .36
1,0 34 .7 2
5,0 49 .5 2
2, 41 1.4 2
68 .5 2
877.2 1
11 .4 8
2,6 33 .5 7
1, 578 .9 1
2,0 49.2 7
141.54
2,6 23.7 7
1, 46 0.3 2
1, 65 1.1 6
1, 985 .7 8
43 .5 2
1, 37 5 .6 4
2,4 26 .3 2
2,6 04 .0 4
2, 380.1 7
1,7 04 .8 9
1, 584 .1 4
1, 232 .57
72 .9 5
1, 172 .42
2,0 65 .9 5
2,484.18
3' 14 7. 10
3, 814 .4 4
1,8 68 .7 8
2,8 72 .7 4
2, 150 .8 8
572 . 62
389 .3 0
1,0 81 .7 3
1,3 72.6 5
1, 958 .7 9
958 .1 1
1, 475 .7 0
749 .1 7
2,4 42 .9 4
2, 664 .0 5
8, 903 .9 7
3,7 36.6 2
3,1 73 .33
1, 36 8.3 0
865 .8 0
1, 671 .0 6
1,8 06 .6 7
2,1 59 .1 1
1,7 49.8 3
1,7 79 .2 6
1, 588.8 6
1,0 60 .46
652 .68
974 .6 2
1,2 82 .6 5
748 .4 3
1, 99 7.5 5
11/12/22 572 171
11/12/22 572 172
11/12/22 572 173
11/12/22 572174
11/12/22 572175
11/12/22 572176
11/12/22 572 177
11/12/22 572 178
11/12/22 5721 79
11/12/22 572180
11/12/22 572181
11/12/22 572182
11/12/22 572183
11/12/22 572 184
11/12/22 572 185
11/12/22 572 186
11/12/22 572187
11/12/22 572188
11/12/22 5721 89
11/12/22 572190
11/12/22 572 191
11/12/22 572 192
11/12/22 572 193
11/12/22 572 194
11/12/22 572 195
11/12/22 572196
11/12/22 572 19 7
11/12/22 572 198
11/12/22 572 199
11/12/22 572 200
11/12/22 572201
11/12/22 5722 02
11/12/22 572 20 3
11/12/22 572 20 4
11/12/22 572205
11/1 2 /22 572206
11/12/22 572207
11/12/22 572 208
11/ 12/22 572209
11/12/22 572 21 0
11/12/22 57 2211
11/12/22 57221 2
11/12/22 57221 3
11/12/22 57221 4
11/12/22 572215
11/12/22 572 216
11/12/22 57 221 7
11/12/22 57221 8
11/12/22 572219
11/12/22 572220
11/12/22 572221
11/12/22 572 222
11/12/22 572223
11/12/22 57 2224
11/12 /22 572225
11/12/22 572226
11/12/22 572 22 7
11/12/22 572 228
11/12/22 572 229
11/12/22 572 230
11/12/22 5722 31
11/12/22 572232
11/12/22 572233
11/12/22 572 234
11/12/22 572235
11/ 12/22 572 236
11/12/22 572 237
11/12/22 57 2238
11:42: 14 11/16/22
REGISTER 10
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
3,5 83 .6 3
4, 265 .42
41, 523 .78
848 .2 0
3' 21 3 .0 6
2, 471 .4 3
2, 166 .1 6
1, 616 .35
1, 060 .88
3, 289 .4 0
2,4 96.48
10 , 30 8.7 8
2, 636 .6 8
460. 23
2, 479 .5 9
138 .5 2
4,0 16 .6 1
2, 31 8.8 9
3, 334 .2 5
513.58
3,4 75 .2 5
2, 435 .8 5
2, 223 . 74
2, 741.22
485 . 23
2, 940 .3 4
4, 39 5 .08
4, 30 7.36
3,8 14 .8 6
3, 31 6.3 0
2, 737 .7 1
2, 166 .88
61 3 .3 0
8, 473 .4 0
2,8 33.3 3
5,354.38
2' 04 1. 98
6,3 32. 71
3, 634 .5 5
4, 49 7.46
3, 117 .7 2
2,0 09 .2 2
1, 811 .35
3, 336.1 0
2,8 45.9 7
3,0 86 .5 7
3, 476 .8 9
2,8 50 .7 2
1,7 84 .6 5
4, 21 7.6 6
4, 69 6.9 5
11, 151. 95
5, 194 .9 6
4,7 14 .4 7
2,8 53 .1 0
3' 651 . 70
2, 944 .7 4
2,8 87 .0 0
4,3 76 .34
2,8 03 .5 7
2, 452 .5 5
3,0 15 .0 2
1, 927 .1 9
1,8 58 .5 2
2, 556 .5 8
2, 556 .1 9
1,7 60 .4 3
3,7 20.65
3 Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
442
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
443
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
444
446
446
446
446
446
450
461
461
461
461
461
461
461
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
PAYEE
8515
8526
8569
8711
8956
9451
9506
9593
9601
9634
486
767
1313
1689
1947
2252
2816
2914
3159
3473
3574
3844
4362
5298
5605
5766
5862
6325
6343
8023
438
2039
2138
2203
2308
2723
4079
4161
4348
4693
5232
5485
5990
6444
6822
7444
8110
8249
501
4218
7359
8096
9243
4482
330
4138
5065
5372
5456
7001
8894
307
372
778
1028
1080
1347
1396
z p
J E
J L
B I
DA
T C
MD
HM
x s
T E
T R
B J
D M
N R
JA
M L
R A
H B
K J
E M
R C
J L
J J
G L
BA
E T
LA
R J
RN
K L
T S
KA
E D
L
p A
S M
M L
S L
AD
c J
CA
S L
T K
J M
AN
C D
L M
KA
RR
WW
K S
c s
E L
DB
J L
HA
RM
E C
E M
J c
J L
E J
AL
MR
J c
CA
GD
B D
CITY OF REDDING 11:42:14 11/16/22
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12/22 REGISTER 10

THOMPSON
TRACY
TUCKER
UPSHAW
VEGA

WILLIAMS
WOODS

WOODWARD
YABRA
WOOD
BRAUD
BERG

CHAPMAN
DAY

COONFIELD
ENYART

GARNERO

GILMORE
GURLEY
HARNEY

ICELY, JR
HEYNE

KASINGER

MAXWELL
MOORE

MCGINNIS
MEYER
O'HERN
ORTEGA

STENDERUP

BERNADAS
COVEY
EGGER

CONTRERAS
CASCIO
FULLER
JANSEN
ISASSI

KAPP LE
KRESHA
LORENS

MCDONALD

NIELSEN
PARKER

QUIROGA

ROLLINS
STROLE

TALAS KI
AYLING

JOHNSON

SAECHAO

SULLIVAN
WEBER
KETEL
AGIUS

HOLSTEIN
LUCIER

MATTSON

MCMURTREY

SUMERLIN

VANLANDINGHAM

ANDREWS
ATKINS
BLAIR
BRYANT
BUICK

CLAYCAMP
COG LE

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
3,325.80
4,944.60
2,482.60
4,686.70
4,440.03
5,813.70
1,103.36
3,138.80
4,795.65
3,565.82
8,573.00
6,223.78
7,498.76
5,361.60
2,894.84
6,457.77
6,310.20
1,916.00
2,872.00
5,597.10
8,517.40
6,092.70
6,560.34
6,171.74
5,771.50
8,290.99
7,208.71
5,855.24
6,143.00
5,628.50
1,094.76
2,444.45
3,7$3.88
2,415.00
1,728.80
3,365.22
1,952.09
714.00
227.29
1,789.60
1,735.28
2,455.88
271.30
900.72
1,843.58
2,419.42
3,516.64
2,882.87
3,709.60
4,702.40
3,488.00
4,090.40
3,330.40
6,960.06
1,905.60
1,735.20
2,752.80
7,591.78
7,587.05
7,199.42
8,349.82
3,650.95
3,742.23
6,342.28
7,206.49
6,838.31
6,232.19
5,923.05

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
1,084.61
1,801.84
710.21
1,603.75
1,954.81
2,036.24

89.05 1,100.58
2,014.63
1,0 49.68
2,811.88
3,211.60
2,817.37
1,930.98
783.67
2,279.89
3,212.51
437.09
1,773.44
2,074.37
4,474.17
2,167.76
2,251.64
2,528.19
1,920.21
2,707.47
2,363.59
2,055.67
2,697.92
2,431.72
177.10
618.80
1,652.44
630.16
372.09
753.02
481. 79
190.54
200.79
453.98
350.99
1,019.73
211. 09
196.61
497.17
1,255.60
1,379.95
802.57
1,492.46
1,934.69
894.47
1,977.92
911.19
2,812.29
452.34
437.05
875.05
5,023.46
3,418.94
2,715.24
2,067.29
1,430.44
1,322.87
1,939.51
3,145.85
2,734.16
1,775.90
3,484.52
11/12 /22 57223 9
11/12/22 572240
11/12/22 572241
11/12/22 572242
11/12/22 572243
11/12/22 572244
11/12/22 572245
11/12/22 572246
11/12/22 572247
11/12/22 572248
11/12/22 572249
11/12/22 572250
11/12/22 572251
11/12/22 572252
11/12/22 572253
11/12/22 572254
11/12/22 572255
11/12/22 572256
11/12/22 572257
11/12/22 572258
11/12/22 572259
11/12/22 572260
11/12/22 572261
11/12/22 572262
11/12/22 572263
11/12/22 572264
11/12/22 572265
11/12/22 572266
11/12/22 572267
11/12/22 572268
11/12/22 572269
11/12/22 572270
11/12/22 572271
11/12/22 572272
11/12/22 572273
11/12/22 572274
11/12/22 572275
11/12/22 572276
11/12/22 572277
11/12/22 572278
11/12/22 572279
11/12/22 572280
11/12/22 572281
11/12/22 572282
11/12/22 572283
11/12/22 572284
11/12/22 572285
11/12/22 572286
11/12/22 572287
11/12/22 572288
11/12/22 572289
11/12/22 572290
11/12/22 572291
11/12/22 572292
11/12/22 572293
11/12/22 572294
11/12/22 572295
11/12/22 572296
11/12/22 572297
11/12/22 572298
11/12/22 572299
11/12/22 572300
11/12/22 572301
11/12/22 572302
11/12/22 572303
11/12/22 572304
11/12/22 572305
11/12/22 572306
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
2, 241.19
3,142.76
1,772.39
3,082.95
2,485.22
3,777.46
1,014.31
2, 038.22
2,781.02
2,516.14
5, 761.12
3,012.18
4,681.39
3,430.62
2' 111.17
4,177.88
3' 097. 69
1,478.91
1,098.56
3' 522. 73
4,043.23
3' 924. 94
4' 3 08. 70
3,643.55
3,851.29
5,583.52
4,845.12
3,799.57
3' 445. 08
3,196.78
917.66
1,825.65
2,131.44
1,784.84
1,356.71
2,612.20
1,470.30
523.46

26. 50
1,335.62
1,384.29
1,436.15

60.21 704 .11
1,346.41
1,163.82
2,136.69
2,080.30
2,217.14
2,767.71
2,593.53
2,112.48
2,419.21
4,147.77
1,453.26
1,298.15
1,877.75
2,568.32
4, 168 .11
4,484.18
6,282.53
2,220.51
2,419.36
4,402.77
4,060.64
4,104.15
4,456.29
2,438.53
4 Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
PAYEE
1482 S F
1536 N A
1581 M A
1583 D T
1839 D A
1867 C E
1933 A A
2046 R W
2047 C M
2198 A E
2598 J D
2604 K P
2618 K A
2688 C E
2694 C A
2696 R J
2728 M R
3091 G A
3142 A E
3155 G W
3173 J A
3242 M A
3289 J J
3388 R H
3480 S E
3493 J E
3536 M E
3561 G S
3816 T G
4106 K W
4114 s s
4179 L M
4283 B A
4301 M M
4379 c s
4652 A P
4726 N R
4803 J J
4922 A A
5027 M R
5342 C A
5728 B W
5745 B T
5751 R J
5763 C R
5787 A D
5904 A C
6245 A H
6338 M K
6431 M R
6869 S B
6928 c J
6932 J L
7003 T D
7032 c p
7286 J s
7631 T M
7666 L A
7819 E J
7820 C A
7829 D W
7873 T E
7886 J N
7900 A Q
8164 D J
8184 G T
8197 c J
8278 N W

CITY OF REDDING
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12/22
CRAMER
BREWER

BOHL IN
COOK

CAMPBELL
BROWN
DI ECK
DIAZ

DEFOREST

DONOFRIO
FOLEY

FOGARTY
FOO TT
FROST

FERGUSON
FLYNN
GOULD
GROSS

GUNDERSON

HARTMAN
HANSEN
HAM
HARVEY
HOBERG
HOWARD

HOUSTON
HENRY
HUNT
HANLON
HANSEN
KINDY

JOHNSON
JONES

KANGERGA

KARLGAARD

KOFFORD

KURLAND
LANGE
LEE
LOWREY
MARTIN
MORRIS

NAKATANI
NARDO

MCBURNEY
MEYER

NIEDERLAND
OTANI

OLIPHANT

PAS CHEN

PLUMMER

PROKUPEK
PYORRE

RO BRECHT

PRITCHARD
RICHEY
SAWYER

SCHREIBER

SHERMAN

RULOFSON
SHAW
SMITH
SMITH
SNYDER
SHERMAN, JR.

SMITH

SIMPSON

STEPHENS

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
7' 3 05. 93
3, 687.89
2,896.46
2,826.08
3,491.12
4, 154.79
4, 006.65
3, 237.26
2,489.11
2, 161. 04
4,812.10
5,107.41
4, 225 .99
3,730.40
2,896.46
2,669.24
2,547.61
4,391.47
5, 641. 53
5,461.29
6,007.65
6, 763.23
5,483.77
5,380.11
9,305.31
4, 657.49
6, 564.73
7, 083.04
4,221.89
4,168.68
4,395.33
3, 314.46
3,483.61
2, 555.64
5, 000.29
5,375.31
2,708.35
4,259.64
8,688.81
7,254.16
5,756.11
4, 034.75
5, 116.15
5,107.67
3, 834.43
3,089.49
4, 259.66
2, 429.47
6,712.66
2' 315. 93
5,274.91
2,908.61
3,841.09
3,501.78
3,805.65
4, 540.17
7,810.49
9,058.40
3,290.69
3,885.33
5,637.83
6, 123.51
4,979.88
8, 008.98
3,683.27
2,679.70
2, 968.20
2, 896.44

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
2, 218.53
913.14
813.21
847.84
614.32
974.53
1, 361.37
943.00
1,010.19
605.32
2,2 71.43
2,018.00
1, 612. 72
1,307.13
869.67
568.75
855.41
1,178.34
2,229 .91
1,496.19
2,548.29
2,420.47
2, 636.15
2,921.99
3,614.36
1,635.56
2, 050.35
3, 484.23
1,055.36
1,136.46
1,002.32
1, 323.06
1,277.35
705.65
1, 806.32
1,464.61
912.40
1, 398. 72
2,892.20
3,152.22
1,782.63
672 .17
1, 759.12
1,430.24
1,321.22
646.44
1, 324.61
785.48
3,913.56
811. 90
1,930.97
986.35
1,400.50
850.79
1,381.93
753.04
3, 286.97
2,972.17
886.59
1,272.36
1,577.08
2, 156.35
1,834.82
3, 196.69
1,002.92
1,481.69
963 .11
875 .11
11/12/22 572307
11/12/22 572308
11/12/22 572309
11/12/22 572310
11/12/22 572311
11/12/22 572312
11/12/22 572313
11/12/22 572314
11/12/22 572315
11/12/22 572316
11/12/22 572317
11/12/22 572318
11/12/22 572319
11/12/22 572320
11/12/22 572321
11/12/22 572322
11/12/22 572323
11/12/22 572324
11/12/22 572325
11/12/22 572326
11/12/22 572327
11/12/22 572328
11/12/22 572329
11/12/22 572330
11/12/22 572331
11/12/22 572332
11/12/22 572333
11/12/22 572334
11/12/22 572335
11/12/22 572336
11/12/22 572337
11/12/22 572338
11/12/22 572339
11/12/22 572340
11/12/22 572341
11/12/22 572342
11/12/22 572343
11/12/22 572344
11/12/22 572345
11/12/22 572346
11/12/22 572347
11/12/22 572348
11/12/22 572349
11/12/22 572350
11/12/22 572351
11/12/22 572352
11/12/22 572353
11/12/22 572354
11/12/22 572355
11/12/22 572356
11/12/22 572357
11/12/22 572358
11/12/22 572359
11/12/22 572360
11/12/22 572361
11/12/22 572362
11/12/22 572363
11/12/22 572364
11/12/22 572365
11/12/22 572366
11/12/22 572367
11/12/22 572368
11/12/22 572369
11/12/22 572370
11/12/22 572371
11/12/22 5723 72
11/12/22 572373
11/12/22 572374
11:42:14 11/16/22
REGISTER 10
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
5,087.40
2,774.75
2,083.25
1,978.24
2, 876.80
3, 180.26
2, 645.28
2,2 94.26
1,478.92
1,555.72
2, 540.67
3, 089.41
2, 613.27
2, 423.27
2,0 26.79
2,100.49
1,692.20
3, 213.13
3,411.62
3,965.10
3,459.36
4,342.76
2,847.62
2,458.12
5,690.95
3, 021.93
4, 514.38
3,598.81
3,166.53
3,032.22
3,393.01
1, 991.40
2, 206.26
1, 849.99
3,193.97
3,910.70
1,795.95
2,860.92
5, 796.61
4,101.94
3,973.48
3,362.58
3,357.03
3,677.43
2,51 3.21
2,443.05
2' 935. 05
1,643.99
2, 799.10
1,504.03
3, 343.94
1,922.26
2,440.59
2, 650.99
2,42 3.72
3,787.13
4,523.52
6,086.23
2,404.10
2,612.97
4' 060. 75
3, 967.16
3' 145. 06
4,812.29
2, 680.35
1,198.01
2,005.09
2, 021.33
5 Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
462
463
463
463
463
463
463
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
501
503
503
503
511
511
511
511
511
511
511
511
511
511
511
511
511
511
511
550
550
550
PAYEE
83 36
8497
8587
8633
8820
9127
9227
9248
983 7
137 4
2303
4709
52 22
6253
7840
326
421
476
1167
1684
2122
2413
31 08
31 31
3843
4081
4150
4285
4446
4667
4969
5406
5767
5822
6772
7026
75 06
7796
7812
8181
8538
90 06
900 7
9011
9027
9778
983 3
847
1558
2282
318
1033
22 87
2832
43 61
4814
4884
5181
5238
5353
5391
6787
7828
9353
9806
1352
1523
1814
E H
S E
J c
T N
R G
D K
T D
C D
JM
C G
CA
R J
RA
p s
c J
J T
C R
T S
s y
WR
M T
B K
D T
C R
C K
JM
BR
KA
AL
R S
E S
S M
KW
T D
s c
K L
D M
T P
M J
D p
J c
MM
NJ
E L
L M
M L
C L
Z G
y s
M
D N
CA
J s
BG
S K
L A
M S
T J
T E
NA
D L
GA
s J
TA
T J
p E
K J
M E

CITY OF REDDING
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12/22

TENORIO

TOMPKINS

TR ONCALE

TYGIELSKI
VALLES
WARD
WEDAN
WELCH

ZEPPIERI

CONCELLO

DIETRICH

KRZNARICH

MASTERSON

O' CONNOR
SMITH

ANTHONY

AUKLAND
BROOKS

MCKINNEY

DANIELS
CALLEN
FISCUS
HALE
HALL

IWAMURA
JANDA
HOWARD
JONES
KELLEY
KRAFT

LINDSTROM

MCCOLLUM
MAIRE

MCNEILL
PRICE
REAGA.lif
RUSSO
SEMB

SHEFFIELD
STREGE

TRIANTAFYLLOU
KUFNER

VISCONTI

VONDERSCHEER
VOROUS
YOCOM

VANDIVER
BONNIN

COPLAND

ESTRADA

ANTONOWICH

BUCHANAN

CALDWELL

GARRISON

KAUFFOLD
LACKEY
LLOYD

MATTIOLI
MAAE
MAXEY

MCDANIEL
PINE

SANDERSON

WILLIAMS- WEST

ZALESNY

CLEMENS
CAGLE
DEEDON

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
4, 038 .81
9,5 52 .2 3
4, 01 4.54
4, 02 4.51
5, 35 4.59
3, 239 .1 3
5,9 23 .0 5
4, 326 .0 1
3, 653. 89
5,5 50.65
2, 288.80
4, 573.35
6,4 69 .7 6
6, 379.44
1,7 25.51
5,2 88 .0 0
7, 845.60
2,795.20
3' 724 . 00
3, 746.40
3,4 77 .8 2
1,7 64 .1 6
3, 022 .4 0
2, 935.40
4,7 75.3 4
3, 022. 40
3,5 68 .0 0
4, 111 .3 6
5, 408. 00
3, 74 6.49
2, 912.0 0
2, 546.40
4,4 86 .4 0
3, 022 .4 0
3, 236 .00
4, 486.40
3, 746.43
3,7 46 .4 0
3, 652.00
4,4 86 .4 0
5, 644 .80
1,5 82 .5 2
4, 111.25
3, 582.40
2, 457.60
2, 292.54
4,8 38 .4 0
3, 90 2.40
2, 76 6.40
3, 902. 40
2, 112.80
3, 378.40
4, 388 .8 0
2,2 72 .8 0
2, 035 .56
2, 912. 00
2, 722. 89
2,2 72 .8 0
1,2 80 .0 0
2, 386. 49
2, 698.93
2, 30 1.0 4
2, 272.80
1,9 10 .2 4
2, 555.20
5,9 00.00
2, 63 4.4 0
4, 140 .8 0

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
1,36 3.69
4, 289.56
1, 36 4.56
1, 528.14
2,3 55.41
1, 246.21
1, 765 .62
1, 373 .1 7
1, 287 .7 1
1, 640.72
678.42
3, 657.48
2,3 81 .2 1
2,4 22 .17
23 3.56
1, 160 .4 6
3, 082 .94
464 .4 2
1, 378.75
1,30 9.8 1
870 .4 5
181 . 61
73 0.6 1
946.49
1, 431.35
868.6 1
80 6.72
1, 488.67
2,5 51.3 2
935 . 13
1, 078.84
825 .4 4
1, 034. 07
1, 048 .4 0
545.93
1, 076.82
1,2 26 .99
1, 159.69
1, 25 6.58
1, 284.51
2, 803.31
36 8.2 9
1, 351.5 8
935 .8 5
682.05
561 .95
1,5 10 .2 0
1, 055 .8 3
658.37
1,3 67.29
779.72
1, 20 7.8 6
766 .8 6
641.13
53 5.01
1, 168 .8 8
918.40
685.12
157.2 1
779.2 4
869 .5 3
789.33
578.43
481 . 22
978.89
2,6 95 .2 8
829 .6 8
1, 281 .0 3
11/12/22 572375
11/12/22 572376
11/12/22 572377
11 /12/22 572378
11/12/22 572379
11/12/22 572 380
11/12/22 572381
11/12/22 5723 82
11/12/22 572383
11/12/22 572384
11/12/22 572385
11/12/22 572386
11/12/22 572387
11/12/22 572388
11/12 /22 57238 9
11/12/22 572390
11/12/22 572391
11/12/22 5723 92
11/12/22 572393
11/12/22 572394
11/12 /22 57239 5
11/12/22 572396
11/12/22 572397
11/12/22 57239 8
11/12/22 572399
11/12/22 572400
11/12/22 572401
11/12/22 572402
11/12/22 572403
11/12/22 572404
11/12/22 572405
11/12/22 57240 6
11/12/22 572407
11/12/22 572408
11/12/22 572409
11/12/22 572410
11/12/22 572411
11/ 12/2 2 572412
11/12/22 572413
11/12/22 572414
11/12/22 572415
11/12/22 572416
11/12/22 572417
11/12/22 572 418
11/12/22 572419
11/12/22 572 420
11/12/22 572421
11/12/22 572422
11/12/22 572423
11/12/22 572424
11/12/22 572425
11 /12/22 57242 6
11/12/22 572427
11/12/22 572428
11/12/22 572429
11/12 /22 57243 0
11/12/22 572431
11/12/22 57243 2
11/12/22 57243 3
11/12/22 572434
11/12/22 572435
11/12/22 57243 6
11/12/22 572437
11/12 /22 572438
11/12/22 572439
11/12/22 572440
11/12/22 572441
11/ 12/22 572442
11:42:14 11 /16/ 22
REGISTER 10
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
2, 675 .1 2
5, 262 .6 7
2, 649.9 8
2,4 96 .3 7
2, 999.18
1, 992.92
4, 157.43
2, 952.84
2, 36 6.1 8
3, 90 9.9 3
1, 610 .3 8
915.87
4, 088.55
3, 957.27
1, 491 . 95
4' 127. 54
4, 762 .6 6
2,3 30 .78
2, 345.25
2, 43 6.59
2,6 07.37
1,5 82 .5 5
2, 291.79
1, 988 .9 1
3, 34 3.99
2, 153.79
2, 76 1.28
2, 622 .69
2,8 56 .6 8
2,8 11 .3 6
1, 833 .16
1,7 20 .9 6
3,4 52 .33
1,9 74 .0 0
2, 690 .0 7
3, 409.58
2, 519.44
2, 586.71
2, 39 5.4 2
3, 201 .89
2, 841.49
1,2 14.23
2,7 59 . 67
2, 646 .5 5
1,7 75 .5 5
1,7 3 0.59
3,3 28.20
2,8 46 .5 7
2,1 08 .0 3
2, 53 5.11
1, 333 .08
2' 170. 54
3' 62 1. 94
1, 631 .6 7
1,5 00 .55
1, 743.12
1,8 04.49
1,5 87 .6 8
1,1 22 .79
1, 60 7.2 5
1, 829.40
1, 511 .71
1, 694.3 7
1,4 29 . 02
1, 576.31
3,2 04.72
1, 804 . 72
2,8 59 .7 7
6 Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
55 0
550
55 0
55 0
550
550
55 0
55 0
55 0
551
551
551
551
551
551
551
551
551
551
551
551
552
552
552
552
552
552
552
552
552
553
55 3
555
555
555
555
555
555
555
555
555
555
555
555
556
556
55 6
556
556
556
556
556
55 6
55 6
556
55 6
556
55 6
556
556
55 6
55 6
556
557
55 7
55 7
557
55 7
PAYEE
21 40
311 0
4097
4690
551 3
6643
7360
7905
8182
51 7
1282
15 47
3471
4122
4479
5790
6354
6827
7299
7904
9639
366
491
62 1
4532
4636
5471
7392
8507
9464
463
6331
1952
3812
4133
4689
5091
6786
7822
8194
8204
8420
9354
9528
275
59 9
11 68
1525
19 55
251 3
2877
311 4
3153
3581
3807
4281
526 2
57 99
8284
8697
8713
9039
9443
1081
225 3
4183
5282
5478
S R
J A
C K
B P
S A
S L
T L
K S
KM
K L
M S
L D
D R
T R
JD
J L
GA
MR
R K
N L
WT
J c
JM
G H
c c
J J
B M
B L
Z T
E D
J p
J
J J
J B
D L
KA
T B
M J
M 0
s c
AD
c p
JR
K L
J c
B K
s w
F R
J E
L V
J L
D W
K G
D T
B J
R E
T J
MD
C R
A E
J K
B M
RH
S L
L K
K L
J F
CA

CITY OF REDDING
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11 / 12 /22
EILTS
HANSEN

JEFFERY
KOSS

MICKELSON
PETTY
JOINER
SAELEE
SEDLER
BAILEY

CHADWICK

COLEMAN

HOOGSTAD
IMAN
KENYON

MITCHELL
OLSEN

PORRAS JR

RICHARDSON
SKOW

WOOLERY

ARMSTRONG

BRUNDIN

BASELEY

KINGSBURY
KNIGHT

MCCURDY

ROBERTS

TORGERSON
WION
AVERY
OHLER
DUTRA
INGELS

HOSKINS
KRAFT
LOUCKS

PRATHER

SIMPSON
SOMERS

SALDANA
THOMAS

WISHARD
WILSON
ADKINS
BAER

CAMPBELL

COSGROVE
DUTRA

LINDSAY JR
GERACI
HAND
HUDSON
HENRY
HUFF

JOSTOCK

MCCOLLUM
SPOON

SCHARGUS

UMSTEAD
URONEN

WALLACE
WILSON
ZANNI

CUNNINGHAM

HITCHCOCK

MATTHEWS
MEIER

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
1, 828.80
3,9 85.10
2, 280.00
1, 875.20
2, 677.60
4, 244.40
2, 285.12
2, 068.01
l,786.40
2,1 12.80
2, 347.32
2, 192.06
1,9 38 .4 0
2,4 71 .3 0
2, 11 2.80
2, 355.15
2, 339.36
1, 753.60
2, 043.40
3, 038.20
2, 22 0.91
2, 302.75
2,2 11.85
2, 301.00
2,2 18.25
2, 485.51
2, 21 7.59
2, 929.70
2, 15 5.07
3, 992.54
2, 631.79
2, 245. 00
2, 01 2.00
2, 591.74
1, 692.52
2, 272.82
2, 272.82
2, 841.99
2, 182.36
1, 942.78
1, 441.60
2, 757.34
2, 606.32
1, 946.89
1, 983.84
2, 320.82
2, 178.14
2,2 18.42
2, 266.77
3, 959.54
2, 287.30
2, 192.04
3, 521 .91
2, 11 2.85
2, 301.00
2, 248.95
2, 196.33
2, 120.16
2, 002.19
2, 264.60
2, 11 2.80
1, 624.52
2, 330.72
855 .90
3, 330.49
1, 308.00
2,3 88 .0 0
3, 530.09

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
583.50
1, 123.14
922. 48
509.92
1,0 81.54
1, 594.73
841 .4 4
836 .4 5
567. 14
747.48
677.20
463.89
55 8.4 0
379.81
779.96
614.6 3
338.48
526.22
648 .9 0
788.90
612.1 9
366.00
774.10
734.68
843.22
740.45
779 .6 4
981.21
552. 65
1, 359.66
809.92
740.54
541 . 3 0
559 .76
456.67
738.84
686.67
797.51
754.77
576.61
360.15
865 .03
876.67
560.07
672.80
645 .5 0
1, 034.02
62 1. 82
646.99
85 9.67
815 .6 2
566.10
1, 103.12
732.42
659.07
692.13
612.57
685 .4 7
472.60
587.54
702.38
22 1.96
605.39
343.63
969.97
359.99
732.93
1, 335.98
11 / 12 /22 572443
11 / 12 /22 572444
11 /12 /22 572445
11 / 12 /22 572446
11 /12 / 22 572447
11 /12 /22 5724 48
11 /12 / 22 572449
11 /12 /22 572450
11 / 12 / 22 5724 51
11 / 12 / 22 572452
11 / 12 /22 572453
11 /12 /22 572454
11 / 12 /22 572455
11 / 12 /22 572456
11 / 12 /22 572457
11 /12 /22 572458
11 / 12 /22 572459
11 / 12 /22 5724 60
11 / 12 /22 572461
11 /12 /22 572462
11 / 12 /22 5724 63
11 / 12 /22 5724 64
11 / 12 /22 572465
11 / 12 /22 5724 66
11 / 12 /22 57 2467
11 /12 /22 5724 68
11 /12 /22 5724 69
11 /12 / 22 572470
11 / 12 /22 572471
11 / 12 / 22 572472
11 / 12 /22 572473
11 /12 / 22 572474
11 / 12 / 22 5724 75
11 / 12 /22 572476
11 /12 /22 572477
11 / 12 /22 5724 78
11 / 12 /22 572479
11 / 12 /22 572480
11 /12 / 22 572481
11 / 12 /22 572482
11 / 12 /22 572483
11 /12 /22 572484
11 / 12 /22 572485
11 / 12 /22 572486
11 / 12 /22 572487
11 / 12 / 22 572488
11 / 12 /22 572489
11 / 12 / 22 572490
11 /12 /22 572491
11 / 12 / 22 572492
11 / 12 /22 572493
11 / 12 /22 5724 94
11 / 12 /22 572495
11 / 12 /22 572496
11 /12 /22 572497
11 / 12 /22 572498
11 / 12 /22 572499
11 /12 /22 572 500
11 / 12 /22 572501
11 / 12 /22 572 502
11 / 12 /22 572 503
11 / 12 /22 572504
11 / 12 /22 572 505
11 / 12 /22 572506
11 / 12 /22 572507
11 / 12 /22 572 508
11 / 12 /22 572509
11 / 12 /22 572 51 0
11 :4 2:1 4 11 / 16/22
REGISTER 10
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
1, 245.30
2, 861.96
1, 357 .5 2
1, 365.28
1, 596.06
2, 649.67
1, 443.68
1, 231.56
l, 21 9.26
1, 365.32
1, 670 .12
1, 728 .1 7
1, 380.00
2, 091.49
1, 332.84
1, 740.52
2, 000.88
1, 227.38
1,3 94 .5 0
2, 249.30
1, 608 .72
1, 936.75
1, 437.75
1, 566.32
1, 375.03
1, 745.06
1, 437.95
1, 948.49
1, 602.42
2, 632.88
1, 82 1.87
1, 504.46
1, 470.70
.2, 031.98
1, 235.85
1, 533 .98
1, 586.15
2, 044.48
1, 427.59
1, 366.17
1, 081.45
1, 892.31
1, 729.65
1,3 86 .82
1, 311. 04
1, 675.32
1, 144.12
1, 596.60
1, 619.78
3, 099.87
1, 471 .68
1, 62 5.94
2, 418 .79
1, 380.43
1, 641.93
1,5 56.82
1, 583.76
1, 434 .69
1, 5 29.59
1, 677.06
1, 410.42
1, 402.56
1, 72 5.33
51 2.27
2, 360.52
948.01
1, 65 5.07
2, 194.11
7 Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
557
557
557
557
557
558
558
558
559
559
61 0
61 0
61 0
61 0
61 0
61 0
610
61 0
61 0
610
61 0
61 0
61 0
610
61 0
61 0
610
610
61 0
61 0
61 0
610
61 0
61 0
61 0
610
61 0
61 0
61 0
61 0
61 0
61 0
610
61 0
61 0
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
62 0
620
PAYEE
7640 T M
8221 J c
8273 T C
9270 C L
9348 D S
4171 B
7981 c c
9288 R A
321 8 p J
5525 W L
385 B J
412 K K
455 E W
577 M R
11 80 D K
1356 M T
1395 J D
1556 B L
2271 M T
3009 J E
3029 T B
31 06 D G
3826 D J
3872 N R
4501 A J
4589 c c
5060 c J
5176 BA
5301 R I
5850 J R
5875 T W
6451 S H
66 59 D B
6823 M H
7303 E L
7304 K
734 5 C R
738 3 T J
7984 A R
8026 J c
8058 K D
82 14 N J
9009 N J
93 30 M L
9772 D R
42 6 M J
11 56 S M
1520 M B
1569 D
1572 M G
1837 S I
1838 c c
21 28 J M
21 78 AM
26 84 K L
26 97 K L
269 9 B D
3021 T G
3599 B J
4113 S M
4116 A D
4121 c c
4137 T
4444 E G
52 33 B M
5350 C R
5620 J L
5971 B B

CITY OF REDDING
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11 /12/22

KNEPPER

WASHINGTON
TAYLOR
WETZEL

WILLIAMS
JETTON

STANDIFER
WESTON
HALL
MILES
ABREU

ANDRADE
BROWN
BUCK
CANNON
CLARK
COLE

BENTHIN
EMRY
GOMEZ

GRANBERRY
HOYT
HUNTER
HALE

KIMBALL
KNIGHT
LOUCKS

MORGANS TERN

MANSFIELD

MI LLER

MADISON
PACE

PETRANEK

PRIMROSE

RICHISON

RICHARDSON

SCHMITZ
RUBEN

STANDIFER

ROBERTSON
STONE

SKULAVIK
VIMONT

WIL SON

YERGENSON

BORREGO

CAMPBELL

CORLESS

CUMMINGS

CASS INGHAM

DAVAINIS
DAVIS

EAGLESON

EDWARDS
FRENCH
FRANKE
FRENCH
HAGAN
HODGE

JENNINGS
JAMES
HUNT
HUGHES
KELLY
LEWIS
MASSEY
MOORE
NEW

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
2, 254.35
1, 308.00
1,9 54 .7 2
1, 595.20
4, 564.69
2, 698.40
2, 284.33
2, 015.36
2, 162.33
1,6 13. 28
2, 469.38
1, 104.00
1, 884.80
2,3 30.85
1,4 24 .0 5
2, 090.74
2, 555.20
2, 272.81
2, 272 .80
640.00
2, 272.80
2,5 56.2 6
1, 978.40
2' 701. 85
2,0 52.60
2,112. 80
3, 394.40
2,3 99.88
3, 010.35
1, 884.80
16 0.00
1,8 72.3 1
768 .00
640.00
2, 272. 80
669 .30
2, 255.87
1, 978.40
870.72
2, 509.00
725. 60
2,1 12.80
1, 978.40
640.00
299.3 1

60.00 880 .5 6
102. 72
1, 71 4.77

86.63 157.50

67.50 53 4.87
795.00

60.00 611 . 25

75.00 693.35
718.80
1, 188.60
270.00
709.82
2, 411.20
33 0.80

67.50 2, 750.40
2, 93 0.40
1, 905.60

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
653 .2 2
36 7.04
288.96
3 93. 01
1, 444.55
1, 106.85
562.66
388.90
985.26
740. 81
518.01
149. 36
345 .8 3
66 3.33
135 .12
416. 33
945.47
673 .6 9
584.00

69.77 553.06
682.50
510.43
525.52
716. 29
513.61
1, 140 .2 7
61 6.3 2
838.35
517.9 0

29.98 527 .7 9
84 .7 6

72. 01
585 .1 0
59 .42
519.75
440.95

76.09 755.70

92.00 464.88
468.89
52 .2 0

18.85 4.59
105.61

7.86 318.08

6.63 12.05

5.17 44.60

99.99 4.59

58.08 5.74

53.17 12 1.08
241.02

20.66 77.62
66 8.67
25 .3 1

5.17 945.40
836. 87
377.49
11/12/22 572 511
11/12/22 572512
11/12/22 572513
11 /12/22 572514
11/12/22 572515
11/12/22 572516
11 /12/22 572517
11 /12/22 572518
11 /12/22 572519
11 /12/22 572520
11/12/22 572 52 1
11 /12/22 572522
11/12/22 572523
11 /12/22 572524
11 /12/22 572525
11/12/22 572 52 6
11/12/22 572527
11/12/22 572528
11 /12/22 572529
11 /12/22 572530
11 /12/22 57253 1
11 /12/22 57253 2
11/12/22 572533
11/12/22 572534
11 /12/22 572 535
11/12/22 572536
11/12/22 572537
11/12/22 572538
11/12/22 572539
11 /12/22 572540
11 /12/22 572541
11 /12/22 572542
11/12/22 572543
11/12/22 572 544
11/12/22 572545
11 /12/22 572546
11/12/22 572547
11/12/22 572 548
11/12/22 572549
11 /12/22 572550
11 /12/22 572551
11/12/22 572552
11/12/22 572553
11/12 /22 572554
11 /12/22 572555
11 /12/22 572556
11 /12/22 572557
11 /12/22 572 558
11/12/22 572559
11 /12/22 572560
11/12/22 57256 1
11 /12 /22 572562
11 /12/22 572563
11 /12/22 572564
11 /12/22 572565
11/12/22 57256 6
11/12/22 572567
11 /12/22 572568
11 /12/22 572569
11/12/22 572570
11 /12/22 572571
11 /12/22 572572
11/12/22 572573
11/12/22 572574
11 /12/22 572575
11 /12/22 572576
11/12/22 572577
11 /12/22 572578
11:4 2:1 4 11 /16/22
REGISTER 10
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
1, 601.13
940. 96
1,6 65.76
1, 202 .1 9
3, 120.14
1, 591.55
1, 72 1.67
1, 626 .46
1, 177.07
872. 4 7
1, 951.37
954. 64
1, 53 8.97
1, 66 7 .52
1, 288.93
1, 674 .41
1, 609.73
1, 599.12
1,6 88.80
570.23
1, 719. 74
1, 873.76
1,46 7.97
2, 176.33
1, 336 .31
1, 599.19
2, 254.13
1, 783 .5 6
2, 172.00
1, 366 .90
13 0. 02
1, 344.52
683. 24
567. 99
1,6 87.70
609.88
1, 73 6.12
1, 53 7.45
794.63
1, 753.30
633. 60
1, 647.92
1, 509.51
587.80
280.46
55 .41
774.95

94.86 1, 396.69

80.00 145.45

62.33 490 .2 7
695 .0 1

55.41 553.17

69.26 640.18
597. 72
94 7. 58
249.34
63 2.20
1, 742.53
305.49

62.33 1,8 05 .0 0
2, 093.53
1, 528.11
8 Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
620
641
641
641
641
742
801
801
801
801
801
801
807
807
807
807
807
807
807
807
807
807
807
807
807
807
807
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
810
821
821
821
821
821
821
821
821
821
821
821
821
851
851
851
PAYEE
6446 N G
7036 D T
7344 J L
7373 M M
8285 c Q
8513 u 0
8568 T W
871 8 T K
89 51 D
9331 T D
9683 C L
1584 J A
451 4 C M
5833 T M
5966 K A
7101 D
1302 K S
1588 c J
2307 T Y
4039 D J
5216 p
5939 G W
14 96 R W
1688 E L
2129 K W
2377 D M
3216 s w
4086 D R
45 53 M J
5098 J R
597 2 J T
6657 J w
7466 J R
7706 C R
8153 M P
8310 L D
89 54 S M
432 J G
1577 J T
2022 D C
2414 M D
2958 M S
3523 S E
5546 D K
5611 J K
5735 c s
5888 J J
6341 T L
6728 A M
7813 J p
8591 R S
8722 J p
9207 J p
850 C M
1951 D C
2196 B J
2403 L E
2893 R E
4149 K J
5092 B E
5231 N J
911 3 W D
9117 J E
9275 D W
9841 S A
490 S D
513 N C
594 L A
CITY OF REDDING 11 :42:1 4 11 /16/22
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12 /22 REGISTER 10 PARIS

RAMO NT

SCHMIDT

ROMO CUMMINGS
STAHL

TORRES- ROMERO

TRUEBLOOD

URRICELQUI

VENEGAS- GARCIA

WIL SON

WILLIAMS

CRUMMETT

KINCAID
MENNE
NIEMER

REYES- MUNOZ
CHEW

CROWELL
BROWN

JACKSON

MANIVONG
NEWNAM

COULTER
DAVIS
ECKERT

FAGANELLO
HANSEN

JARRETT

KIROUAC

LEWIS , JR

NI CKELL
PEBLEY
ROSSIE

SCHERTZ
SUBER

ROBINSON

VEGA SANCHEZ
BURNS
CROW
COLE
FELCH

GREATHOUSE III

HUBBARD
MILLS
MOORE

MILLSAP
NELSON

OLIPHANT
PEREZ

SCHMITZ

TRENHOLM

VAKULICH
WARNER
BALLOU
DUKE
ELWOOD
FORD

GENDREAU
GRIGGS
LANDIS
LOUCKS

WALLACE

WADLEIGH

WEBSTER
ZEH
AVERY

MCCOLLUM
BRYAN

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
14 9.6 3

51. 00

30.0 0
189 .0 0
727 .7 6
562 .35
30 7.5 0
3, 771 .2 0
187 .5 0
743 .0 0
74 .4 3
2,4 25 .6 0
3,6 85 .5 1
4,6 85 .0 0
7, 110 .40
1,6 88 .8 0
2,5 85 .6 0
2, 35 8 .0 0
1,1 52 .0 0
3, 37 8 .40
2,1 12 .8 0
2,3 39.8 8
2,3 88 .0 7
5, 504 .4 8
4,7 42 .2 8
3,2 98 .2 3
3,5 94 .37
2, 97 7.4 6
3, 51 1.2 0
4, 955 .2 0
5, 172 .48
4,0 34 .5 3
3, 87 1.2 0
2,5 00 .3 2
4,5 97 .1 0
2,3 88 .0 0
5, 867 .4 6
1, 652 .80
2,7 62 .3 9
3,1 41.4 1
3,6 44 .5 5
3,6 29 .7 0
2, 45 4 .5 6
3,5 69 .0 0
2, 47 1.6 0
2,4 35.5 2
3,0 10 .3 5
2, 11 6.8 0
2,3 88 .0 1
3,7 24 .0 0
2, 050 .1 3
2,3 88 .0 0
4, 29 4 .6 5
2, 31 1.5 2
1, 865 .6 9
2, 555 .2 0
3,8 84 .0 1
1,9 75 .2 0
3,6 54 .4 0
2,1 12 .8 0
1,9 31.7 7
2, 38 9.6 0
5,7 46 .8 0
31 2. 93
1,6 55.2 0
5, 874 .4 0
25 ,9 2 8.7 6
3, 692 .0 0

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIO NS OF CHECK NUMBER
11 .45

3.9 0

3.5 5
14 .4 6
81 .1 8
82 .5 2
23 .5 3
1,7 58 .0 9
16 . 37
68 .5 1

5.6 9
565 .40
1, 056 .4 4
1,30 0.9 0
3,0 39.7 9
460 .8 7
1,0 42 .4 0
626 .3 6
190 .8 0
1, 36 4 .7 9
53 7.1 8
68 9.5 0
1, 109.4 6
2,0 80 .0 0
1,4 6 2.8 9
975 .1 0
875 .9 8
1, 480 .9 4
1, 151 . 63
1, 251 .8 5
1,47 3.9 8
1, 237 .1 2
1, 57 1.7 7
881. 57
1, 066 .0 9
36 9.1 4
1, 733 .1 2
450 .1 7
825 .42
787 .39
866 .8 1
1, 091 .4 1
711 . 39
1,37 6.7 3
686 . 71
580 .9 4
871 .5 0
728 . 48
708 .43
1, 114 .5 3
346 .8 8
553 .2 9
1, 55 4.9 9
45 1.1 1
528 .0 5
958 .9 7
1, 05 1.9 2
594 .2 5
89 1 . 96
656 .6 6
426 .2 7
660 .0 1
1, 640 .3 5
38 .20
384 .6 9
2,7 60 .4 3
15 ,4 21.2 0
1, 952 .2 7
11 /12 /22 572579
11 /12 /22 572580
11/12 /22 572581
11 /12 /22 572582
11/12 /22 572583
11 /12 /22 57 2584
11/12 /22 572585
11/12 /22 572586
11/12 /22 572587
11/12 /22 572588
11/12 /22 572589
11 /12/22 572590
11 /12 /22 572591
11/12 /22 572592
11 /12 /22 572593
11/12 /22 572594
11/12 /22 572595
11/12 /22 572596
11/12/22 572597
11/12 /22 572598
11/12/22 572599
11/12 /22 572600
11/12 /22 572601
11/12 /22 572602
11 /12 /22 572603
11 /12/22 572604
11/12 /22 572605
11 /12 /22 572606
11/12 /22 572607
11/12 /22 572608
11/12 /22 572609
11/12 /22 57 2610
11/12 /22 57 2611
11/12 /22 57 26 12
11/12 /22 572 613
11/12/22 572 614
11/12 /22 57 2615
11 /12/22 57 2616
11 /12 /22 57 2617
11/12 /22 572618
11/12/22 572619
11/12 /22 572620
11/12 /22 572621
11/12 /22 572622
11 /12 /22 572623
11/12/22 572624
11/12 /22 572625
11/12 /22 572626
11/12 /22 572627
11 /12 /22 572628
11/12 /22 572629
11 /12 /22 572630
11/12 /22 572631
11/12 /22 572632
11/12/22 572633
11/12/22 572634
11/12 /22 572635
11/12 /22 572636
11/12 /22 572637
11/12 /22 572638
11/ 12 /22 572639
11/12 /22 572640
11 /12/22 572641
11/12/22 572642
11/12 /22 572643
11/12 /22 572644
11/12/22 572645
11/12 /22 572646
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
138 .1 8
47 .1 0
26 .4 5
174 .5 4
64 6.5 8
4 79. 83
283 .9 7
2, 01 3 .1 1
171 .1 3
67 4 .49
68 . 74
1, 860 .2 0
2, 62 9.0 7
3, 384 .1 0
4, 070 .6 1
1, 227 .9 3
1,5 43.2 0
1, 731.6 4
961 . 20
2, 01 3 .6 1
1, 575 .6 2
1, 650 .38
1, 278 .6 1
3, 424 .48
3, 279 .3 9
2' 323 .1 3
2, 718 .39
1, 49 6 .5 2
2, 359 .5 7
3, 703 .35
3, 698 .5 0
2, 797 .41
2, 299.4 3
1, 61 8.7 5
3, 531.0 1
2, 018 .8 6
4,1 34.3 4
1, 202 .6 3
1, 93 6.9 7
2, 35 4.0 2
2' 777. 74
2,5 38 .2 9
1,7 43 .1 7
2, 192 .2 7
1, 784 .89
1, 85 4 .5 8
2,1 38.8 5
1, 388 .32
1, 67 9.5 8
2, 609 .4 7
1, 703 .2 5
1, 834 .7 1
2,7 39.6 6
1, 860.4 1
1,3 37.6 4
1, 596.2 3
2, 832 .0 9
1, 380 .9 5
2, 762 .4 4
1,4 56.1 4
1, 505 .5 0
1, 72 9.5 9
4, 10 6. 45
27 4.7 3
1,2 70 .5 1
3, 113 .9 7
10, 507 .5 6
1, 73 9. 73
9 Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFE RENCE
851
851
851
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
85 2
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
852
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
PAYEE
4406 P E
5265 M M
9818 N B
596 J R
1072 T
1170 K M
1171 KR
1378 J M
14 88 R C
1578 J A
1601 J p
1876 J M
1883 S D
1892 J M
1925 G M
1949 L M
2285 T J
241 5 J A
27 40 T M
2841 T D
2879 w J
31 67 E S
3603 C L
3859 K C
3860 A C
41 23 K A
4291 H S
4735 C D
5066 J K
5319 D L
5369 D S
5417 R W
5648 D L
5718 H R
5727 R C
573 9 J s
5757 C A
5881 c J
5887 D J
6407 D W
6655 s p
7281 J D
7471 R H
7502 N R
7705 N D
783 5 J B
7906 R P
7953 D D
8115 K A
81 83 K M
9268 J D
9838 J A
193 M D
27 3 A B
321 N A
462 E J
47 4 M L
475 C L
485 S D
518 c s
608 R J
845 R S
1083 D L
114 0 F D
1152 J v
1464 S L
1505 T A
1521 E C
CITY OF REDDING 11 :4 2:1 4 11 /16 /22
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11 /12 /22 REGISTER 10 KEENER
DAHL
ZETTEL
DAVIS

BRENNER III

CANDELARIA- HUT

CAMPBELL
CO LIA

CRAWFORD
CAREY
DAY
DRESEN
DOERS
DAVIS
DUNN
CASNER
ESTES
CROSS
GALE

WALL ING
GIBSON

HAL PENNY

HOLDREN

HASTINGS
HARVEY
HARDER

JOHNSON
LANE
LOADER

MARLATT

MATTHEWS

MCCARTIN

MCCAUSLAND

MURRAY II
MYERS
MOORE
MAXEY
NAILS
FRESE
PACK

PETERSON
RIC H

ROSSITER
ROSSOW

SCHNEIDER
SMITH

FREEMON SOWERS

SP RACKLIN
STRAWS
SPEER
WEBB

ZALESNY
ADAMS

AITCHISON

ARONSON

BAINBRIDGE
BROOKS
BRYANT

BAH TEN
BAILEY
BABER
BODNER

BULLARD

CALLEGARI

CALHOUN III
COX

CRACKEL

CHAMBERS

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
6,1 84 .8 0
2,4 25 .6 0
10 ,5 10 .40
2, 218 .41
6,6 80 .0 9
4,2 76 .8 0
4,6 48 .8 0
4,7 46.8 6
7,1 27 .9 4
5, 601 .8 8
4,0 70 .4 0
3,4 58 .8 3
6,2 87.3 3
10 ,1 98 .0 6
8,6 68 .8 0
5, 794 .40
5,2 58 .7 0
3,8 76 .8 0
5, 350 .4 0
6,7 24 .9 3
5, 719 .8 5
7,2 50 .6 8
6,2 46 .5 3
7, 83 7.6 0
4, 26 4 .7 6
4,2 74 .7 4
5, 482 .4 0
3,0 37.6 0
5,3 28 .8 0
9,5 27.4 1
7, 17 0.9 5
4, 917 .2 2
5, 31 4. 71
5,6 58 .7 8
5, 094 .7 3
4,2 26 .40
5, 71 4 .2 0
2,8 92 .8 0
6,5 85 .9 3
6,5 80 .8 0
5,9 00 .4 0
6,5 80 .8 0
7 I 31 4 • 96
5,4 13 .6 0
5,0 99.2 0
6, 708 .8 5
3,8 76 .8 0
4,0 28 .0 1
5, 342 .4 0
3,2 69 .2 0
3,8 76 .8 0
4,5 24 .0 0
4, 974 .40
5, 30 2 .40
9,1 68 .8 0
5,3 27 .6 9
3,5 15 .2 0
7, 064 .4 0
35 3 .9 7
5,3 84 .8 0
8,2 10 .4 4
3,2 55 .2 0
8, 201 .4 4
9,6 35 .4 6
4,9 28 .0 0
4,4 50 .2 4
3, 255 .2 0
4, 570 .40

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
2,4 02.7 2
687 .9 5
3,4 78 .9 5
701 .8 2
2,6 52 .2 9
1,6 8 5.1 3
1, 134 .8 4
2,0 42 .40
2,7 57 .2 3
1, 73 7.2 4
2,3 04 .0 2
1,0 79 .3 4
2,9 63 .9 1
3,2 58 .39
2,1 81 .20
1, 963 .8 5
1,2 70 .0 1
1, 26 4 .1 3
1, 613 .2 2
3,2 04 .1 5
2, 37 0 .2 0
1, 966 .9 6
2, 31 9. 41
2,1 08 .6 1
1, 25 0.0 3
884 .6 0
1, 91 2.0 9
465 .2 4
2,2 2 8.1 7
4,7 01 .9 9
2,3 63 .9 4
2,3 45 .4 7
2,1 86 .39
1, 860 .2 7
1,9 88 .4 1
1, 58 2.7 1
2,2 27.40
544 .7 5
2,9 09 .4 7
3, 055 .4 6
1, 969 .5 8
1, 957 .0 2
2,3 30 .31
2,2 7 8.9 4
1, 955 .2 8
2,5 69 .9 4
1, 35 2 .4 5
1, 572 .1 9
2,0 25 .2 7
1, 06 3.9 2
1,0 26 .0 6
1,2 92.9 1
1,6 02.9 7
1, 88 6.0 7
2,9 38 .3 2
1, 81 3 .46
1, 290 .49
2,0 99 .8 5
339 .2 7
1, 009 .29
2,4 67 .35
1, 152 .7 5
2,6 85 .4 4
3,6 78 .6 5
1, 934 .5 0
1,2 2 4.1 9
869 .8 5
1, 042 .4 5
11/12 /22 572647
11 /12 /22 57 2648
11 /12 /22 57264 9
11/12 /22 572650
11/12 /22 572651
11/12 /22 572652
11 /12 /22 57 2653
11/12 /22 57 26 54
11 /12 /22 572655
11/12 /22 572656
11/12 /22 572657
11 /12 /22 572658
11 /12 /22 572659
11/12 /22 572660
11 /12 /22 572661
11 /12 /22 57 2662
11 /12 /22 57 2663
11/12 /22 57 26 64
11/12 /22 572665
11/12 /22 572666
11 /12 /22 572667
11 /12 /22 57 2668
11/12 /22 572669
11/12 /22 572670
11 /12 /22 572671
11 /12 /22 572672
11/12 /22 57 2673
11/12 /22 572 67 4
11 /12 /22 572675
11 /12 /22 572676
11/12 /22 572677
11/12 /22 572678
11 /12 /22 572679
11/ 12 /22 572680
11 /12 /22 572681
11/12 /22 572682
11 /12 /22 572683
11 /12 /22 572684
11 /12 /22 572685
11 /12 /22 572686
11 /12 /22 572687
11/12 /22 572688
11/12 /22 572689
11 /12 /22 572690
11 /12 /22 572691
11/12 /22 572692
11/12 /22 572693
11 /12 /22 572694
11/12 /22 572695
11/12 /22 572696
11/12 /22 572697
11 /12 /22 572698
11 /12 /22 572699
11/12 /22 572700
11 /12 /22 572701
11 /12 /22 572702
11/12 /22 572703
11 /12 /22 572704
11 /12 /22 572705
11/12 /22 572706
11/12 /22 572707
11 /12/22 572708
11/12 /22 572709
11/12 /22 572710
11 /12 /22 572 711
11/12 /22 572 712
11 /12 /22 572 713
11/12 /22 572 714
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
3, 782 .0 8
1, 737 .6 5
7, 031 .45
1, 516 .5 9
4, 02 7.8 0
2, 59 1.6 7
3, 513 .9 6
2, 704 .4 6
4, 37 0.7 1
3, 864 .6 4
1, 766 .38
2, 379 .49
3, 323 .4 2
6, 939 .6 7
6, 487 .6 0
3, 830.5 5
3, 988 .6 9
2 I 61 2 • 67
3, 737 .1 8
3, 520 .7 8
3, 349 .65
5' 283 . 72
3, 92 7.1 2
5, 728 .9 9
3, 014 .7 3
3, 390 .1 4
3, 570 .3 1
2, 572 .3 6
3, 100 .6 3
4, 825 .42
4, 807.0 1
2, 571 .7 5
3,1 28 .3 2
3, 798 .5 1
3, 106 .3 2
2,6 43.6 9
3, 486.8 0
2,3 48.0 5
3, 676 .4 6
3, 525 .3 4
3' 93 0. 82
4, 623 .7 8
4, 984 .6 5
3,1 34 .6 6
3' 143 . 92
4,1 38 .9 1
2, 524 .3 5
2, 455 .8 2
3, 31 7.1 3
2, 205 .2 8
2,8 50 .7 4
3, 231.0 9
3, 371.43
3, 416 .3 3
6, 23 0.4 8
3, 51 4 .2 3
2, 224 . 71
4, 96 4 .5 5
14 . 70
4, 375 .5 1
5,7 43 .0 9
2, 102 .4 5
5, 516 .0 0
5, 956 .8 1
2, ,9 93.5 0
3, 226 .0 5
2, 385.35
3,5 27.9 5
10 Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE PAYEE
853
853
853
853
853
853
85 3
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
85 3
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
853
855
855
855
855
855
861
1534
1563
1586
1813
1926
2048
2305
2666
2892
2966
3031
3039
3068
31 13
351 6
3577
3828
3867
4037
4139
4216
4219
4298
4299
4382
4588
4876
4989
5016
5042
5481
5627
5644
5729
5775
5779
5849
59 44
6378
6408
6487
6721
6820
6831
699 2
7355
7428
7462
7619
7817
7967
8055
821 6
8229
841 3
8489
8857
8860
89 66
9038
9114
9115
493
1917
5202
7964
8307
452
S M
MA
D C
M D
JR
MD
s
L C
AM
B T
M p
vu
c s
c p
D C
T T
VT
w c
E L
J H
MM
p s
RA
R J
R J
K P
MA
JM
KA
E T
J G
TA
CA
D C
J L
J J
T D
E G
T A
R E
J p
c J
WM
c c
K C
s p
N S
J c
R S
R P
J J
L T
G R
p R
CD
c s
c
KW
A E
T R
J J
E J
J L
M K
A J
H E
G L
C I

CITY OF REDDING
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11 /12 /22

CARLSON

COOPMAN
DAHLE , JR .

DREW
DUNGAN

DUVAL- MONTALVO
CORTES

FRANDSEN

GILLIL AND

GOEHRING

HAMPTON

GRANT III
GREENE
HAAG

HAMILTON

HUGGINS
IBARRA

HOPWOOD

JACKSON

HENDRIX

JOHNSON

JOHNDROW
JONES

KATSARES

KOSCHNICK
LARSEN
LINK
LOPEZ
LOWE

MCINNES
MILLER
MOORE
MYERS

MARCHESS EAULT

MCKNELLY

MIL LER

NEWSOME
ORNER

PACKARD
PARKS

PEARSON
PRESTA
POLEN
REED

ROWLANDS
CULVER
ROSS

SANDIFER

SHAEFFER
SCOTT
STOREY

SWINEHART
SYDOW

THOMASSON

TORRENCE

VAN IWARDEN

VANDERBECK

VILLARREAL
WALSH
WARNER
WATSON
BOWERS
DUNBAR

MAGGIORE
SPANER
TARVIN

BAILEY- DELE LLO

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
3, 303 .87
3,7 34 .7 3
5, 911 .0 6
5,3 5 5.6 4
5, 056 .0 0
3,7 94 .7 4
3,0 76 .8 0
3,3 48 .8 0
3,0 83 .2 0
6, 600 .8 0
6,9 39.6 7
3,3 86.4 0
3,1 85 .6 0
3,1 41.8 2
5,2 14 .7 8
3,6 02 .40
2, 21 8.4 0
5,1 23 .2 0
5, 47 5.1 2
7, 8 3 5.1 8
14 ,8 98 .7 1
7,2 36 .0 0
3,1 36 .1 1
3,0 25 .6 0
3, 774 .0 2
5,5 60 .0 0
7' 861. 60
3,8 35.0 4
3,2 04 .6 6
6,3 46.31
6,6 00 .8 0
9,1 20 .0 0
6, 360 .0 0
5,0 56 .1 4
7,9 77 .6 0
6,3 46 .4 0
7, 3 35.0 5
5, 101 .2 8
7,1 32 .6 5
3,9 83 .1 0
724 .4 4
8' 661. 88
4,2 76 .8 0
6,0 44 .0 0
8, 510 .4 2
4,9 18 .4 0
2, 218 .41
6,6 00 .8 0
4,5 07.2 0
3,0 83 .2 0
6, 923 .2 0
4,4 90 .4 0
5,5 60 .0 0
4,9 74 .4 0
4,2 76 .8 0
6,4 44 .8 0
7, 069. 98
3,2 48 .0 0
8,3 76 .49
4, 87 4.8 8
4,9 10 .31
9, 37 2 .5 7
7,1 80 .8 0
4,0 70 .40
3,3 48 .8 0
5,1 37.6 0
3,6 92 .0 0
3, 36 1.6 0

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
841 .0 9
918 .6 1
2,0 70 .41
2, 47 0.7 3
2,3 34 .8 3
1, 104 .2 4
845 .4 0
763 .6 1
869 .5 0
2, 41 6.3 6
2,0 89.9 3
605 .5 3
1, 09 7.7 6
916 .6 0
2,7 84 .4 7
1,0 42 .4 2
1, 060 .9 7
2,0 80.4 5
1,4 9 9.0 7
2,4 85 .1 2
6,8 36.9 6
2,8 79 .7 1
70 1. 25
643 .9 4
1,3 2 5.1 8
2, 35 1.9 0
3,7 78 .4 7
1, 035.7 6
1,2 65 .8 3

2. 551. 22
2, 696 .1 5
4, 196 .1 2
2,6 09.49
1,35 7.0 3
3,8 50 .5 1
1, 512 .0 8
2,4 42 .30
2,1 29 .6 8
2,7 48 .7 4
1, 725 .6 3
347 .1 6
2, 766 .8 5
613 . 45
2,2 51 .7 6
2, 577 .7 1
2,1 80 .4 0
770 .7 1
2,5 39.7 0
603 .6 0
988 .8 7
2,0 40 .5 3
1, 383 .6 5
2, 155 .7 2
1, 660 .7 7
1,3 49.9 1
2,6 34 .9 1
2, 390 .31
1, 056 .4 0
2,5 14 .80
1, 380 .0 5
1,8 48 .7 8
3, 910 .0 6
2, 120.47
1, 37 8.0 5
89 8.0 4
961 .32
774 .0 1
607 .0 0
11 /12 /22 572715
11 / 12 /22 572716
11 /12 /22 572717
11 /12 /22 572718
11 /12 /22 572719
11 /12 /22 572720
11 /12 /22 572721
11 /12 /22 572722
11 /12 /22 57 2723
11 /12 /22 572724
11 /12 /22 572725
11 /12 /22 572726
11 /12 /22 572727
11 /12 /22 572728
11 /12 /22 572729
11 /12 /22 572730
11 /12 /22 572731
11 /12 /22 572732
11 /12 /22 572733
11 /12 /22 572734
11 /12 /22 572735
11 /12 /22 572736
11 /12 /22 572737
11 /12 /22 572738
11 /12 /22 572739
11 /12 /22 572740
11 /12 /22 572741
11 /12 /22 572742
11 /12 /22 572743
11 /12 /22 57 2744
11 /12 /22 5727 4 5
11 /12 /22 5727 4 6
11 /12 /22 572747
11 /12 /22 572748
11 /12 /22 572749
11 /12 /22 572750
11 /12 /22 572751
11 /12 /22 572752
11 / 12 /22 572753
11 /12 /22 57 2754
11 /12 /22 572755
11 /12 /22 572756
11 /12 /22 572757
11 /12 /22 572758
11 /12 /22 572759
11 /12 /22 572760
11 /12 /22 572761
11 /12 /22 572762
11 /12 /22 57 2763
11 /12 /22 57 2764
11 /12 /22 572765
11 /12 /22 572766
11 /12 /22 572767
11 /12 /22 572768
11 /12 /22 572769
11 /12 /22 572770
11 /12 /22 572771
11 /12 /22 572772
11 /12 /22 572773
11 /12 /22 57 27 74
11 / 12 /22 572775
11 /12 /22 572776
11 /12 /22 572777
11 /12 /22 572778
11 /12 /22 572779
11 /12 /22 572780
11 /12 /22 572781
11 /12 /22 572782
11 :4 2:1 4 11 /16 /22
REGISTER 10
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
2, 46 2.7 8
2,8 16.1 2
3,8 40.6 5
2, 88 4 .9 1
2, 721 .1 7
2, 690 .5 0
2, 231.4 0
2, 585 .1 9
2, 213 .7 0
4, 184 .4 4
4, 849 .7 4
2, 780.8 7
2, 087 .8 4
2, 225 .2 2
2, 430.3 1
2, 559 .9 8
1, 157 .4 3

3. 042 . 75
3, 976 .0 5
5, 350.0 6
8, 061 .7 5
4, 35 6.2 9
2, 434 .8 6
2, 381.6 6
2,4 48.8 4
3, 208 .1 0
4, 083 .1 3
2, 799 .2 8
1, 938 .8 3
3, 795 .0 9
3, 904 .6 5
4, 923 .8 8
3, 750 .51
3, 699 .1 1
4,1 27.0 9
4, 834 .3 2
4, 89 2.7 5
2, 971 .6 0
4' 3 83 . 91
2, 257 .4 7
3 77. 28
5, 89 5.0 3
3, 663 .35
3, 792 .2 4
5, 932 .7 1
2, 738 .0 0
1,4 47.7 0
4, 061 .1 0
3, 903 .6 0
2, 09 4 .33
4, 88 2.6 7
3, 106 .7 5
3, 404 .2 8
3, 31 3.6 3
2, 926 .8 9
3, 809 .8 9
4, 679 .6 7
2, 191 .6 0
5, 86 1.6 9
3, 494 .8 3

3. 061 .5 3
5, 462 .5 1
5, 060 .3 3
2, 692 .3 5
2,4 50.7 6
4, 176 .2 8
2, 91 7.9 9
2, 754 .6 0
11 Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
861
863
863
863
863
863
863
863
863
863
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
864
867
867
867
867
867
867
867
867
867
870
870
870
870
871
871
872
872
872
872
872
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
874
875
875
875
875
PAYEE
9146 J L
137 6 D D
222 9 F J
2876 J T
3537 J M
4719 B L
4866 M L
5259 J F
7798 J R
8502 C D
49 2 R C
1158 D J
1560 J L
2031 N A
2686 A R
2817 cc
3109 A J
4035 B J
421 1 G J
5171 DE
5487 A L
564 3 K R
5838 J p
5942 J c
72 96 M L
7893 B W
8100 D 0
9814 K L
625 R C
1032 M M
1036 A J
3548 A M
3862 K N
7389 N M
838 0 D C
84 39 V L
9144 M
838 B J
34 01 B D
64 33 M A
954 9 T L
5281 R K
8867 J D
823 N B
1502 G A
1929 J E
6736 M D
738 2 J D
240 6 P N
2813 K M
3034 A M
3571 w c
3870 S R
49 88 D A
537 1 T J
5765 D P
5893 c s
674 9 M D
6767 B A
7802 D J
8054 M E
82 46 K D
9277 P N
9813 Z A
2013 T C
2814 M A
4523 K C
5602 T A
CITY OF REDDING 11 :4 2 :1 4 11/16/22
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12/22 REGISTER 10

WATKINS
COOK

CLAUDINO
GERBER
HALTER
KUHN

LAWRENCE

MORRISON III

SAMPLES
TONA

BARRERA

CAMPBELL
COATS
COVEY

FRO EBER
GARNER
HARNEY

JACKSON

JOHNSON
LOGAN

MEWHIRTER
MILLER

MI FSUD
NEWNAM

RI CHARDS
SHAW
STRAUB
ZANNI
BAILEY

BURROUGHS

UDOVICH
HUNT

CHRISTLE
ROSE
TIEGS
THOM.ASY
WAYNE

BISH OP
HODGE
PALMER

WYHLIDKO
MARVIN

VANDIVER
BAILEY

COUGHRAN
DOBSON

PETERSEN
ROSSOW

FALCONER
GARNER
GREEN
HUNT

HULLINGER
LINSON

SPENCER
MYERS
TAYLOR

PETERSON
PUTNAM

SALKELD

STRATTON

TACKETT
WEST
ZANNI
CONLEY

GARNER JR
KINDIG

MITCHELL

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
5, 618.40
3, 686.40
111. 74
3, 503.04
3, 656.18
4, 73 9.28
4, 120.00
5, 730.09
3,2 28 .0 0
4, 898.40
2,44 0.00
3, 483.94
1, 884.80
2, 215.20
2, 594. 59
2, 03 9.00
2, 336 .89
2,6 50 .3 8
2, 531 .20
2, 554 .3 8
3,8 24 .00
4, 380.00
2,7 84.4 3
2, 648.05
2,4 40.00
2, 167.20
2, 53 7.60
3,7 59.36
6,4 68.80
2, 280.00
1, 26 9.62
3, 547.20
1,916.00
2, 001.61
2, 38 9.60
2, 280.00
5, 080.80
3,5 25.52
3, 644 .0 1
2, 553 .60
3, 724 .01
3, 852.80
5, 618.40
4, 433 .90
4, 744. 00
4, 285.60
3, 642.01
2, 737 .16
2, 483.3 3
3, 777.60
2, 588.80
2,9 92.81
1, 937 .8 1
2, 499 .20
2, 99 2.81
2, 530 .1 6
2, 89 7.52
2,8 03.79
1, 987.69
2, 44 0.0 0
2, 269. 60
2,4 40.00
1, 884.80
2, 53 1.20
4,5 89.38
2, 619.20
4, 647.22
4, 744. 00

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
1,1 99 .41
1, 505.84

5.81 1, 107.30
2, 212.19
1, 923 .71
1, 350.44
2, 020.62
1,1 28 .1 9
1, 504.35
487.77
1, 377.78
427.61
642 . 71
783.06
365.45
466.20
1, 067.51
1, 422.27
883.01
1, 550.91
1, 573.01
848.22
822.38
753.25
64 7. 31
903 .17
1, 31 4.45
2, 537.34
1, 222.69
128.17
1, 680.75
614.26
630.4 9
609.4 9
1, 111.57
2,6 23.37
1, 474.46
2, 065.73
790.55
1,587.23
1, 586.07
2, 085.87
2, 303 .33
2, 156.70
1, 33 6.4 4
1, 083.48
632.9 8
766.22
1, 125.28
932 . 11
1,3 30.13
372.46
656.97
1, 43 3.35
818 .13
92 3.51
1,3 61.83
668.63
813 .07
733. 56
618.40
424 .17
866.68
1,5 20.30
827.80
1, 701. 58
1, 715.62
11/12/22 572783
11/12/22 572784
11/12/22 572785
11/12/22 572786
11/12/22 572787
11/12/22 572788
11/12/22 572789
11/12/22 572790
11/12/22 572791
11/12/22 572792
11/12/22 5727 93
11/12/22 572794
11/12/22 572795
11/12/22 572796
11/12/22 572797
11/12/22 572798
11/12/22 572799
11/12/22 572800
11/12/22 572801
11/12/22 572802
11/12/22 572803
11/12/22 572804
11/12/22 572805
11/12/22 572806
11/12/22 572807
11/12/22 572808
11/12/22 572809
11/12/22 572810
11/12/22 572811
11/12/22 572812
11/12/22 572813
11/12/22 572814
11/12/22 572815
11/12/22 572816
11/12/22 572817
11/12/22 572818
11/12/22 572819
11/12/22 572820
11/12/22 572821
11/12/22 572822
11/12/22 572823
11/12/22 572824
11/12/22 572825
11/12/22 572826
11/12/22 572827
11/12/22 572828
11/12/22 57282 9
11/12/22 572830
11/12/22 572831
11/12/22 572832
11/12/22 57283 3
11/12/22 572834
11/12/22 572835
11/12/22 572836
11/12/22 572837
11/12/22 572838
11/12/22 57283 9
11/12/22 572840
11/12/22 572841
11/12/22 572842
11/12/22 57284 3
11/12/22 572844
11/12/22 572845
11/12/22 572846
11/12/22 572847
11/12/22 572848
11/12/22 57284 9
11/12/22 572850
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
4, 418.99
2, 180.56
105. 93
2,3 95. 74
1, 443 .99
2, 815.57
2, 769.56
3, 709.47
2, 09 9.81
3,3 94.05
1, 952.23
2, 106.16
1, 457.19
1, 572.4 9
1, 811.53
1, 673.55
1, 870.69
1, 582.87
1, 108.93
1, 671.37
2,2 73 .09
2, 806.9 9
1, 936 .21
1, 825.67
1, 686.75
1, 519.89
1, 634.43
2, 4 44 .91
3, 93 1.4 6
1, 057.31
l, 141.45
1, 866.45
1, 301.74
1, 371.12
1, 780.11
1, 168.43
2, 457.43
2, 051.06
1, 578.28
l, 763.05
2,136 .7 8
2, 266 .7 3
3, 532. 53
2, 13 0.57
2, 587.30
2' 94 9 .1 6
2, 558.53
2, 104. 18
1, 717.11
2, 652.32
1,6 56 .6 9
1, 662.68
1, 565.35
1, 842.23
1, 559.46
1, 712.03
1, 974. 01
1, 4 41.96
1, 31 9.06
1, 626.93
1, 536 .0 4
1, 821.60
1,4 60.63
1, 664.52
3, 069.08
1, 79 1.40
2, 94 5.64
3, 028.38
12 Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
875
875
875
875
875
875
875
875
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
888
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
889
890
890
890
890
890
890
891
891
891
891
891
891
891
891
891
891
893
893
893
893
PAYEE
582 1 J T
6097 J A
6477 J p
6834 M J
8287 T
8457 M K
9008 D J
9226 D P
419 A K
579 H M
182 6 s w
21 97 M E
23 88 B G
239 9 V L
2887 L M
31 01 W A
3841 L M
4104 s J
43 64 V B
5161 C A
5207 M D
5228 J R
5269 J s
5683 N A
6768 A L
7323 J R
7346 J A
7490 E M
8202 M L
82 17 SM
1179 ND
1492 A B
182 1 N L
4303 M T
5243 R L
5273 S G
5740 P M
6789 D M
6814 N S
6829 R A
734 7 N H
734 9 H J
735 2 T J
7479 A J
7887 S A
8169 J w
9325 A C
9783 K W
448 KN
1582 L J
1872 S A
251 5 A
522 3 J D
5768 K E
1568 S B
2027 K S
263 5 J J
2844 R E
4120 A L
5760 C R
5861 T L
5973 T T
8017 KL
9602 M H
3842 w J
5486 W L
6632 M A
667 8 A

CITY OF REDDING
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12/22
MARSH
NOLLER
PARKER

PI TTMAN

SI ZELOVE

THOMPSON

VIRAMONTES

WEBSTER
AUBERG
BURDEN
DAVIS

ELLIOTT
FARGEN

FAULKNER

GILL ELAND

GUITRON
BRYAN

GIBBONS

KARLSON
LAAM

MADISON

LOCKWOOD

MCMURTREY
MURRAY
PONCE
RIDER

STANDIFER
RUIZ

SEVERSON
SI LVA
CANNON

COUGHREN

DELLARAGIONE
JUN AS

MCCARLEY
MARVIN

MCKENNA
PITTA

PURSELL
PORRAS

RUSSELL
RIGSBY

STROHMAYER

RUCKLOS
SMITH

SEHRT III
WHELEN
YOUNG
BONEY
CRAMER

DI PAOLO
FIGURA

MARTINUSEN
HUNTER

BUNNELL

CHANDLER

FORSETH-DESHAI
GEORGE
JENSEN

MCCARTY

MIKKELSEN

NI COLAY
STEELE
WILCOX
IVEY
MENARD

PARTS CH

PEACOCK

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE
3, 984.00
3, 064.80
1, 978.40
2, 960.00
2, 062. 40
3, 742.50
2, 417.80
2, 96 0.00
2, 280.00
1, 910.3 6
3, 72 6.40
1, 786.40
9, 554.40
1, 73 0.45
6, 044.00
2, 634 .40
7,23 6.00
3, 21 9.20
4, 864.80
1, 967. 74
4, 435.20
1,963 .99
3,204.80
3, 727.88
1, 969.61
2,812 .00
1, 591 . 02
2, 280.01
786.96
1, 786.41
3,4 21 .60
2, 623. 20
2, 06 8.80
15,501 .2 4
456.00
2, 623. 20
2,235.12
3, 041.62
1, 970.40
2,068.80
372. 00
2,812. 00
600.00
2, 635 .50
2,3 39.07
2, 06 8.80
6, 622.12
2, 623. 20
1,2 93 .6 0
2, 275.20
3, 180.80
1, 135.07
2, 275.20
3, 866 .4 0
1, 978.40
2,3 88.00
5, 122.40
2, 555.20
2,8 53.6 0
2,1 64.00
2, 567.12
1, 884.80
3,259.20
2,3 88.00
591. 00
606.76
3, 092.00
1, 916. 02

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
921.46
872.42
352.63
1, 145.92
499.34
1,2 68.72
66 0.55
950.24
828.07
435.55
940. 73
488.09
4, 045.59
627. 92
1,6 64.81
708.83
2, 942.65
964.39
1,8 53 .4 1
606.66
1, 829.14
460.77
83 3 .5 5
1, 566 .8 5
504.77
82 1. 23
31 6.79
62 3.41
205.88
602.75
1, 449.57
838.62
563. 58
5,002 .6 5

28.73 874.08
706.07
1,095.3 1
444.88
580.76

47.33 1, 035. 48

69.64 888.55
624.30
387.95
1, 768 .8 2
626.38
247.95
53 9.86
919.51
162.69
775.14
1, 171.47
488.78
812.41
2,35 5.3 1
847.75
1, 322.96
687.86
597.99
560.83
1,0 86.16
63 6.3 8
102.51

92.97 817.74
1, 649.13
11/12/22 572851
11/12/22 572852
11/12/22 572853
11/12/22 572854
11/12/22 572855
11/12/22 572856
11/12/22 572857
11/12/22 572858
11/12/22 572859
11/12/22 572860
11 /12/22 572861
11/12/22 572862
11/12/22 572863
11/12/22 572864
11/12/22 572865
11/12/22 572866
11/12/22 572867
11/12/22 572868
11/12/22 572869
11/12/22 572870
11/12/22 572871
11/12/22 572872
11/12/22 572873
11/12/22 572874
11/12/22 572875
11/12/22 572876
11 /12/22 572877
11/12/22 572878
11/12/22 572879
11/12/22 572880
11/12/22 572881
11 /12/22 572882
11/12/22 572883
11/1 2/22 572884
11/12/22 572885
11/12/22 572886
11/12/22 572887
11/12/22 572888
11/12/22 572889
11/12/22 572890
11/12/22 572891
11/12/22 572892
11/12/22 572893
11/12/22 572894
11/12/22 572895
11/1 2/22 572896
11/12/22 572897
11/12/22 572898
11/12/22 572899
11/12/22 572900
11/12/22 572901
11/12/22 572902
11/12/22 572903
11/12/22 572904
11/12/22 572905
11/12/22 572906
11/12/22 572907
11/12/22 572908
11/12/22 572909
11/12/22 572910
11/12/22 572911
11/12/22 572912
11/12/22 572913
11/12/22 572914
11/12/22 572915
11/12/22 572916
11 /12/22 572917
11/12/22 572918
11 :4 2:1 4 11/ 16/22
REGISTER 10
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
3, 062.54
2, 192.38
1,625 .77
1,8 14.08
1,5 63 .06
2, 473.78
1, 757.25
2, 009. 76
1, 451.93
1,474.81
2, 785.67
1,298.31
5, 508.81
1, 102.53
4,379 .19
1, 925.57
4, 293.35
2, 254.81
3,0 11.39
1, 36 1.08
2, 60 6.06
1,503.22
2, 37 1.25
2,1 61 .03
1, 464.84
1, 990.77
1, 274.23
1,656.60
581.08
1, 183.66
1, 972.03
1, 784.58
1, 505.22
10 ,4 98 .5 9
427.27
1,7 49 .1 2
1, 529.05
1, 946.31
1, 525.52
1, 488.04
324 .67
1,776. 52
53 0. 36
1, 746.95
1,7 14.77
1, 680.85
4, 853.30
1, 996.82
1, 045.65
1, 735 .34
2,2 61 .29
972.38
1,500.06

2. 694. 93
1, 489.62
1, 575.59
2, 767.09
1, 707.45
1, 530 .64
1,476.14
1, 969 .13
1, 323. 97
2, 173. 04
1, 751.62
488.49
513. 79
2, 274.26
26 6.89
13 Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY32

PAYROLL

REFERENCE
893
894
894
894
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
895
897
89 7
897
89 7
897
89 7
899
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
990
422
422
432
442
44 2
442
444
444
444
50 1
511
555
556
556
556
55 7
55 8
852
852
855
863
864
872
875
PAYEE
74 60 A S
1231 A F
5742 T L
7895 E A
478 M R
569 E R
1215 A L
20 28 J 0
282 9 v J
30 94 D R
3136 B R
31 61 H A
413 5 G M
45 31 S K
531 7 DA
5786 R J
83 99 K M
8570 p c
8714 D P
8859 A P
794 p J
131 1 R N
5218 s
586 9 D N
60 88 S A
74 94 H L
5246 C D
494 D J
615 N S
1316 M S
1817 MK
203 8 G E
3137 S E
328 8 N L
35 26 J M
50 87 M R
5244 K K
5884 c w
638 1 P H
7878 N L
82 63 M L
84 38 E D
17 02 BE
7763 M J
952 9 N A
38 24 D M
5479 G L
559 3 M J
881 S E
2138 E D
5485 S L
421 C R
980 6 T J
509 1 T B
35 81 D T
4281 R E
7644 D R
9270 C L
79 81 c c
1072 T
5887 D J
19 17 MK
4866 M L
9814 K L
82 3 N B
45 23 K C

CITY OF REDDING
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12/22
11 :4 2 :1 4 11/16/22
REGISTER 10
ROYER
CATES
MAYNES
SHORT
BARNES

BERGREN
CARTER
DAINES
MILLER

GREGORY
HUNT

GUSTAFSON
HALL

CRAVENS
MANN

MCQUEEN

THIBERT
TRUMAN
USREY

VAN BOEKEL
DAHL

THOMPSON

LAFRENIERE
DAVIS

NOETZEL
WILSON

MISENER
BERRY
BADGER
CHRIST
DAVIDS

DESTEPHENO JR
HAGAN
HARRI
HUI
LOCOCO
MCGEE

NEILSON

OSTENDORF
SMITH
BRUNET
THOMAS
DEWALT

SIMONSEN
WILSON
HULL

MEADOWS

MONTGOMERY
BOS
EGGER

MCDONALD

AUKLAND

ZALESNY
LOUCKS
HENRY

JO STOCK

SCHECKLA
WETZEL

STANDIFER

BRENNER III
FRESE
DUNBAR

LAWRENCE
ZANNI
BAILEY
KINDIG
PAGE

TOTAL DATE CHECK GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
59 8.88
3, 340 .00
2,7 60 .00
2, 386.41
3, 846 .4 0
2, 869.60
4,2 40 .00
4,70 2.4 0
2,0 95.21
3, 20 4.80
2,876.80
3, 870.40
2, 192.80
2, 932. 80
4, 702.4 0
5,4 13 .6 0
2, 63 6.80
215.85
3, 488.00
7,2 95 .22
3,1 29 .6 0
3, 436 .00
1, 675.4 0
2,8 38.40
2,8 38.4 0
4, 388.00
3,1 64.00
2, 878.41
4, 06 8.80
3, 870.4 0
1, 589.60
2,4 86 .4 0
2, 194.41
3,1 23. 20
2, 00 1.6 0
2,3 68.00
2, 36 8.00
2, 741.63
3,1 23 .20
5, 090 .4 0
24 8.80
58 . 01
1,4 41.2 9
635 .9 6
776.78
1,2 40 .7 0
742 .3 1
1, 580.3 3
1,8 24 .7 9
419 .2 5
822.34
880.6 3
1,0 96.9 0
45 2.94
1, 185.32
1, 94 0.2 6
2, 206 .45
621.4 5
19 9.3 4
822.4 9
1, 93 3.47
1, 05 8. 94
99 6.31
615 .3 1
1, 193.63
92 0 . 06
1, 576. 81
831 .29
1, 043 .02
1, 525. 88
1,170 .1 0
505 .2 0
610 .2 2
65 2.17
1,2 86 .9 9
65 2.64
59 9.5 2
659 .4 9
1, 166.47
1, 05 7.82
1, 36 1.43

91. 03
2, 878.40 434 .5 3
3,7 65 ,8 88.13 1, 43 1,29 3.54
9, 511.20
1,4 5 5.2 0
1, 899 .60
6, 51 9 -6 0
6, 55 7.6 0
1, 676.80
1,0 58.40
1,8 80.4 0
1,2 16 .40
11 , 768.4 0
1, 277.60
2, 272.80
3, 169 .2 0
528.2 0
2, 272.80
797 .60
1, 126.80
3, 483.00
2, 378 .8 0
2, 03 5.2 0
1, 030 .00
1, 339 .60
1, 943.60
2, 142.80
2, 641 .18
20 1. 26

89. 17
l,69 7.06
1, 335 .88
174 .6 7
49 .7 5
39 4.9 7
146 .4 4
3,3 32.27
187. 89
242. 78
751 .1 5

33. 02
40 1.3 5
34 .84
28 .7 3
481. 56
45 2 .3 7
469 .07
220.37
155 .4 0
213 . 79
399.8 3
11/12/22 572 919 54 0.87
11/12/22 572 92 0 1, 898 .71
11/12/22 572 92 1 2, 124.04
11/12/22 572 922 1, 609 .63
11/12/22 572 92 3 2, 605 .70
11/12/22 572 924 2, 127.2 9
11/12/22 572 925 2, 659 .67
11/12/22 572 926 2,877.61
11/12/22 572 927 1, 675.96
11/12/22 572 928 2, 382 .46
11/12/22 572 92 9 1,99 6.17
11/12/22 572 930 2, 773.50
11/12/22 572 931 1,7 39 .86
11/12/22 572 932 1, 747 .4 8
11/12/22 572933 2, 76 2.14
11/12/22 572 934 3, 20 7.15
11/12/22 572 935 2, 015.35
11/12/22 572936 16 .5 1
11/12/22 572 937 2,6 65 .51
11/12/22 572 938 5,3 61.75
11/12/22 572 939 2, 070 .6 6
11/12/22 572 940 2,4 39 .69
11/12/22 572 941 1, 06 0.09
11/12/22 572 942 1, 644 .77
11/12/22 572943 1, 918 .3 4
11/12/22 572 944 2,8 11.19
11/12/22 572 945 2,3 32.71
11/12/22 572 946 1,8 35 .3 9
11/12/22 572 947 2, 54 2.92
11/12/22 572 948 2, 700 .3 0
11/12/22 572 94 9 1,084.40
11/12/22 572950 1, 876.18
11/12/22 572 951 1, 54 2.24
11/12/22 572 95 2 1,8 36 .2 1
11/12/22 572 953 1, 34 8.9 6
11/12/22 5729 54 1, 768.48
11/12/22 572 955 1, 708.51
11/12/22 572 956 1, 57 5.16
11/12/22 572 957 2, 06 5.38
11/12/22 572 958 3, 728.97
11/12/22 572959 15 7.77
11/12/22 572960 2,4 43 .87
11/08/22 608533
11/08/22 608534
11/08/22 608 535
11/ 08/22 60 85 36
11/08/22 60 8537
11/08/22 60 8538
11/08/22 608 539
11/08/22 608 540
11/08/22 60 8541
11/08/22 60 8542
11/08/22 60 8543
11/08/22 608544
11/08/22 60 8545
11/08/22 608546
11/08/22 60 8547
11/08/22 60 8548
11/08/22 608 549
11/08/22 608550
11/08/22 60 8551
11/08/22 60 8552
11/08/22 608553
11/08/22 608554
11/08/22 60 8555
11/08/22 608556
2,3 34, 59 4.5 9*
6,8 70 .0 2
1, 253 .94
1,8 10.43
4, B.22 .5 4
5' 221 . 72
1, 50 2.13
1, 00 8.65
1, 485.43
1, 069 .9 6
8,43 6.13
1, 089. 71
2,0 30 .02
2, 418.05
49 5.18
1, 871.4 5
762. 76
1, 09 8.07
3, 00 1.44
1, 926.43
1, 566 .13
809 . 63
1, 184.20
1,7 2 9.81
1, 742.97
14 Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY3 2 CITY OF REDDING 11 :4 2:1 4 11 /16 /22
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11 /12 /22 REGISTER 10 PAYROLL PAGE 15

GROSS AMOUNT TOTAL DATE CHECK AMOUNT OF

REFERENCE PAYEE PAYABLE DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER CHECK 889 1179 N D CANNON 1, 710 .8 0 98 .5 6 11 / 08 /22 608557 1, 61 2 . 24 891 2635 J J FORSETH- DESHAI 1,2 8 0.6 0 169 .8 3 11 /08 /22 608558 1, 110 .7 7 891 41 20 AL JENSEN 1,4 26 .8 0 100 .4 6 11 /08 /22 608559 1, 326 .3 4 89 1 5760 c R MCCARTY 1,0 82 .0 0 97 .6 5 11 /08 /22 608560 984 .35 89 3 5486 w L MENARD 630 .40 69 .6 0 11 /08 /22 608561 560 . 80 888 2388 B G FARGEN 14 ,3 31.6 0 5, 565 .1 9 11 /08 /22 608562 8, 766.41 511 41 62 A B HULL 51 2.0 0 36.2 7 11 /12 /22 608563 4 75 . 73 553 7652 p c SCHARGUS 3,4 09 .7 9 1, 258 .9 0 11 /12 /22 608564 2, 150 .89 556 900 B F BOUGHN 3,4 39.7 6 1,1 52 .5 0 11 /12 /22 608565 2, 287 .2 6 557 1043 R K BRUCE 3,1 99. 79 873 .46 11 /12 /22 608566 2, 326 .33 558 7702 M I SEGUIN 2,8 24 .8 1 813 . 36 11 /12 /22 608567 2,0 1 1. 45 85 2 91 48 M L WATSON 4,4 09 .6 8 1, 559 .3 7 11 /12 /22 608568 2, 850.31 89 3 7685 D N SEELY 2, 27 7.6 1 771 . 53 11 / 12 /22 608569 1, 506 .0 8 CITY PAID FICA 53 ' 071. 22 53 ,0 71 .2 2 11 /12 /22 2906 CITY PAID PARS 722 .7 0 722 .7 0 11 /12 /22 2907
CITY /PARS OFFS 342 , 138 .39 342, 138 .3 9 11 /12 /22 2908 50 5,8 09.5 5 422 ,6 33 .7 9 83 , 175 .7 6**
i' , r',-1(.../ 4, 27 1,6 97 .6 8 1,8 53 ,9 27.3 3 2, 417, 770.35*** If·!
TREASURY GENL ACCT 11 /12 /22 572961 100 ' 000. 00
1 TREASURY GENL ACCT 11 /12 /22 572962 10 0, 00 0.0 0
2 TREASURY GENL ACCT 11 /12 /22 572963 310, 527 .1 3
4 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPT 11 /12 /22 572964 154 ' 521. 85
5 CITY OF REDDING 11 /12 /22 572965 300 , 46 8.1 9
8 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPT 11 /1 2/ 22 572966 15, 609 .0 5
10 PARS/US BANK - REP 11 /12 /22 572967 342, 753 .25
12 PARS/US BANK - EBS 11 /12 /22 572968 16 ,4 98 .7 7
18 LOCAL 1245 ELECT 11 /12 /22 572969 5, 30 8.8 5
19 UPEC LOCAL 792 11 /12 /22 572970 716 . 48
20 UPEC FIRE MGT 11 /12 /22 572971 89 .5 6
21 MEMBERS lST CR UNION 11 /12 /22 572972 14 , 26 6.2 4 22 SI ERRA CENTRAL CR UN 11 /12 /22 572973 12 ,4 14.6 7 23 UNITED CRUSADE FUND 11 / 12 /22 57297 4 102 .0 0
24 LOCAL 1934 IFF 11 /12 /22 572975 7, 340 .9 4
25 SI ERRA CENTRAL CR UN 11 / 12 /22 572976 9,6 30.0 0
26 PEACE OFFI CERS ASSOC 11 /12 /22 572977 5, 627.5 9
27 REDDING EMP ASSOC 11 /12 /22 572978 1, 94 0.0 0
28 LOCAL 1245 IBEW 11 /12 /22 572979 7, 87 8.5 9
29 RIEO 11 /12 /22 572980 12 , 447 .9 7
30 VAL IC 11 /12 /22 572981 11 4, 058 .31
31 PARS/US BANK - ARS 11 /12 /22 572982 1, 445 .4 0
32 ICMA 11 / 12 /22 572983 15, 716 .5 0
33 VANTAGE CARE 11 /12 /22 572984 158 , 072 .4 9
34 PORAC RET MED TRUST 11 /12 /22 572985 600 .0 0
36 WORKTERRA MED/SPEND 11 /12 /22 572986 3, 979 .8 8
38 PARS 401 A PLAN 11 /12 /22 572987 4. 63 6. 84
41 SDU 20 11 /12 /22 572988 278 .3 0
41 SDU 20 11 /12 /22 572989 300 .0 0
41 SDU 20 11 /12 /22 572990 323 .0 7
41 SDU 20 11 /12 /22 572991 39. 23
41 SDU 24 11 /12 /22 57299 2 46 .1 5
41 SDU 20 11 /12 /22 57299 3 588 .4 6
41 SDU 20 11 /12 /22 572994 589 .8 4
41 SDU 22 11 /12 /22 572995 679 .85
41 SDU 20 11 /12 /22 572996 45 5.5 3
41 SDU 20 11 /12 /22 572997 18 .4 6
41 SDU 21 11 /12 /22 572998 4.6 1
71 CITY OF REDDING 11 /12 /22 572999 11 8,7 52 .1 2
17 AFLAC 11 /12 /22 60857 0 1, 97 9.7 7
37 AFLAC PRETAX 11 /12 /22 608571 9, 480 .6 1
553 11 /12 /22 608572
565 11/12 /22 60857 3
614 11 /12 /22 608574
622 11 /12 /22 60857 5
624 11 /12 /22 60857 6
633 11 /12 /22 608577
642 11 /12 /22 60857 8
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) PAY3 2

PAYROLL

REFERENCE PAYEE
654
CITY OF REDDING 11 :4 2:1 4 11/16/22
REGISTER OF DEMANDS AND CHECKS DATE 11/12/22 REGISTER 10

GROSS AMOUNT

PAYABLE

TOTAL DATE CHECK

DEDUCTIONS OF CHECK NUMBER
11/12/22 608579
PAGE

AMOUNT OF
CHECK
1, 853 ' 927 .3 3**
* * * * *
16 Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers) AUTHORIZED BY :
� .
r
ft '-1�\t\r \.� �}-t!vLDIR ECTOR oif'FINANCE

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS

DULY APPROVED AT A MEETING OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF REDDING HELD ON
i I - I L .:J . . ' ,) ;)-
DATE _C_I_T_Y�C-L_E_R_K��D-A_T_E
��
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: ^Accounts Payable Register No. 9 and Payroll Register No. 10 (4(b)--Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept the City of Redding Treasurer’s Report for the month of October 2022.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact to accepting the report.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could choose to not accept the report and provide direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

Attached is the Treasurer’s Re port for the month ended October 31, 2022 , the October 2022 Portfolio Management Report, and a summary of the City of Redding ’s (City) portfolio. For comparative purposes, prior month information is also reported.

The City’s portfolio meets the requirements of Investment Policy No. 408 . Market values for securities are obtained from US Bank Institutional Trust and Custody Department. The Treasurer’s accountability total may be measured against the Finance Departme nt ACR 133 cash reconciliation report for October 2022.

The effective monthly rate of return for City T reasurer-managed funds during October 2022 was

1.57 percent, a gain of two basis points from September 2022. The Fiscal Year 202 2-23 rate of return was 1.45, a gain of five basis points from September 2022. A basis point equals one one - hundredth of one percent, or 0.01 percent.

Investment activity in the portfolio during the month of October 2022 included the purchase of three Federal Agency Coupon Bonds. In addition, there was an adjustment in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) to accommodate cash flow.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(c)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(c)--City of Redding Treasurer's Report for October 2022.

Allyn Feci Clark, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 60
Report to Redding City Council November 16, 2022
Re: 4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022 Page 2

The Treasurer’s Accountability changed from $276,945,348 to $ 279,438,796, an increase of $2,493,448. The increase is in line with normal operating activity levels.

The City Treasurer respectfully recommends the Council accept the attached Treasurer’s Report for October 2022 noting a Total Treasurer’s Accountability of $279,438,796 and an organizational total of $ 293,530,276, which includes assets held by the Ci ty as S uccessor Agency to the Redding Redevelopment Agency, as well as Entity and Trustee accounts.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Treasurer's Report October 2022
Packet Pg. 61
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022) Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: ^Treasurer's Report October 2022 (4(c)--Treasurer's Report - October 2022)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept City of Redding Proof of Cash reconciliation and ACR133 report for the month of October 2022.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact to accepting the report.

Alternative Action

The City Council could choose to not accept the Proof of Cash reconciliation and ACR133 report and provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

The City Council has requested a monthly report on pooled cash. The ACR133 report summarizes, by fund, the month -to-date pooled cash balances and transactions. The Proof of Cash reconciles the ACR133 report to the Treasurer’s monthly report.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^ACR133, Current Cash Balance
^Proof of Cash
MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(d)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(d)--ACR133 Report and Cash Reconciliation for the Month of October 2022.

Allyn Feci Clark, Director of
Finance/City Treasurer
Packet Pg. 84
ACR133 CITY OF REDDING KINGSSYS 9:39:13 11/09/2022GENERAL ACCOUNTING DATED 11/09/2022CURRENT CASH BALANCE - CITY COUNCIL REPORT PAGE 1ENDINGBALANCE10/31/2022111 GENERAL FUND 23,087,119.29120 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 43,547.87121 ENT ANDERSON GROUNDWATER 122,156.70-122 PARKING FUND 589,697.44123 GENERAL SPECIAL REVENUE 62,277.47124 IPSS SPECIAL REVENUE 1,249,704.49125 ROLLING STOCK REPLACEMNT 13,196,525.07126 SPECL GAS TAX ST IMPROVE 7,149,723.69127 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 3,087,554.08128 DEVELOPMENT FUND 5,049,932.26129 LIBRARY 222,293.92130 BRANCH LIBRARIES 45,971.89134 MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FUND 3,099,105.34-140 TOURISM/CONVENTION FUND 352,131.46-142 ELECTRIC UTILITY FUND 54,650,103.89143 WATER UTILITY FUND 58,102,703.14145 WASTEWATER UTILITY FUND 45,448,582.19147 STORM DRAIN UTILITY FUND 7,602,964.51148 WEST CENTRAL LANDFILL 11,272,604.44149 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION 15,330,493.56150 MEDIA, COMMS & PR 87,275.75151 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,770,306.09153 FLEET MAINTENANCE 213,048.46154 BUILDING MAINT & CONSTR 1,247,705.25158 RECORDS MANAGEMENT 102,312.65160 EMPLOYER SERVICES 38,153.40-162 RMU ADMINISTRATION 1,293,270.78165 GEOGRAPHIC INFO SERVICES 583,665.05166 COMMUNICATIONS 188,782.97168 REPROGRAPHICS 73,632.14169 VOLUNTEER SERVICES 24,655.03-171 SPECIAL DEPOSITS FUND 9,834,872.99172 RISK MANAGEMENT 7,469,280.24173 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS P/R 1,876,121.75174 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT GRP INS 2,732,418.12175 GASB 45 TRUST FUND 39,399.10178 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 4,637,712.99191 CD BLOCK GRANT FUND 547,789.09193 HOUSING AUTHORITY 191,580.05-194 REDDING REDEVELOPMENT 2,990.70-200 REDDING AREA BUS AUTHOR. 37,982.10-230 LOW/MOD INC HOUS ASSET 574,674.26300 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIST. 314,923.96400 LANDSCAPE DISTRICTS 397,559.65 FINAL TOTAL 276,307,795.71ACR133 9:39:13 11/09/2022
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: ^ACR133, Current Cash Balance (4(d)--ACR133 Report and Cash Reconciliation - October

CITY OF REDDING

PROOF OF CASH
RECONCILIATION BETWEEN TREASURER'S REPORT AND ACR 133
As of October 2022
ACR133 TREASURER
END OF MONTH BALANCE 276,307,795.71 279,438,796.49 LESS OUTSIDE MANAGED FUNDS (366.67)
ACR133 Report
CASH ACCOUNTS NOT ON ACR133
LIBRARY MERCHANT DEPOSIT 100.00

BAD CHECKS -
PAYROLL TIMING DIFFERENCE 3,453,031.44
BANK CHARGES (116,739.60)

WIRE TRANSFER TIMING DIFFERENCE
OTHER ADJUSTMENTS (1,642,227.51)
BANK DR/CR (1,436,669.78)
TOTALS 278,001,860.04 278,001,860.04
Sheet "D" October 2022
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: ^Proof of Cash (4(d)--ACR133 Report and Cash Reconciliation - October 2022)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Ordinance No. 2655, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.02 (Building Code) by amending Section 16.02.010 (California Building Code Adopted); Chapter 16.03 (Residential Code) by amending Section 16.03.010 (California Residential Code Adopted); Chapter 16.04 (Mechanical Code) by amending Section 16.04.010 (California Mechanical Cod e Adopted); Chapter 16.05 (Plumbing Code) by amending Section 16.05.010 (California Plumbing Code Adopted); Chapter 16.06 (Electrical Code) by amending Section 16.06.010 (California Electrical Code Adopted); Chapter 16.07 (Energy Code) by amending Section 16.07.010 (California Energy Code Adopted); Chapter 16.08 (Green Building Standards Code) by amending Section

16.08.010 (California Green Building Standards Code Adopted); Chapter 16.09 (Housing Code) by amending Section 16.09.010 (International Maintenanc e Code Adopted), and making Findings of Facts relating to local climatic, geological, and topographic conditions, all relating to the adoption of the California Building Standards Codes.

Attachments
^Ordinance No. 2655
MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(e)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655, adopting the 2022 California Building Standards Code (CBSC) and related amendments to Chapt ers 16.01 through 16.09 of the Redding Municipal Code
Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 87
ORDINANCE NO. 2655

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING REDDING
MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 16 (BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION),
CHAPTER 16.02 (BUILDING CODE) BY AMENDING SECTION 16.02.010 (CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE ADOPTED); CHAPTER 16.03
(RESIDENTIAL CODE) BY AMENDING SECTION 16.03.010
(CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE ADOPTED); CHAPTER 16.04
(MECHANICAL CODE) BY AMENDING SECTION 16.04.010
(CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ADOPTED); CHAPTER 16.05
(PLUMBING CODE) BY AMENDING SECTION 16.05.010 (CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE ADOPTED); CHAPTER 16. 06 (ELECTRICAL CODE) BY AMENDING SECTION 16.06.010 (CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE ADOPTED); CHAPTER 16.07 (ENERGY CODE) BY AMENDING
SECTION 16.07.010 (CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE ADOPTED);
CHAPTER 16.08 (GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE) BY
AMENDING SECTION 16.08.010 (CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING
STANDARDS CODE ADOPTED); CHAPTER 16.09 (HOUSING CODE) BY AMENDING SECTION 16.09.010 (INTERNATIONAL MAINTENANCE

CODE ADOPTED), AND MAKING FINDINGS OF FACTS RELATING TO

LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL, AND TOPOGRAPHIC

CONDITIONS, ALL R ELATING TO THE ADOPTION OF THE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Redding makes the following findings of fact necessary for changes or modifications to the 2022 State Building Standards Code due to local conditions existing in the City of Redding:

A. Changes or Modifications. Pursuant to Section 17958.5, 17958.7 and 18941.5 of the State of California Health and Safety Code, the City of Redding adopts and amends the 20 22 edition of the California Building Code, the 20 22 edition of the California Residential Code, the 2022 edition of the California Plumbing and Mechanical Codes, the 2022 edition of the California Electrical Code, the 2022 edition of the California Green Building Code and the 2021 edition of the International Property Maintenance Code as they pertain to the regulation of buildings and structures.

B. Findings. Pursuant to Sections 17958.5, 17958.7 and 18941.5 of the State of California Health and Safety Code, the City of Redding has determined and finds the changes or modifications noted herein are needed and a re reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, and topographic conditions.

First reading done: 11/15/2022 JP
For adoption on : 12/06/2022 4-0
CC agenda item #4(e)
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code) C. Local Conditions. Local conditions have an adverse effect on the potential for life and property loss, making necessary changes or modifications to the 20 22 California State Building Standards Code in order to establish and maintain an environment which will provide the community a desirable level of protection.

Below are listed adverse local climatic, geological, and topographic conditions:

1. Climatic.

a. Precipitation. The normal rainfall for the City of Redding is approximately

33.6 inches annually. Winter storms are responsible for the heaviest intensity of precipitation, with two -thirds of the rain coming between December and March and 15 perce nt between April and June. The City typically experiences snow once or twice a year, with depth of less than a foot. Snow depths have attained 18" or more at least twice in the last 100 years. In both cases, there were building failures due to the weigh t of the snow. Snow in Redding is typically wet and is frequently rained upon.

Drifting snows have not been an issue within the City.

b. Temperature. Summer sunshine is abundant in the Redding area, with over 39 days a year with temperatures of 100 de grees or higher. The Northern California valley sees approximately 200 days of clear skies, with May through September having temperature ranges between 95 and 115 degrees.

Winter temperatures occasionally dip below freezing at night.

2. Geological and Topographic.

a. The City of Redding is located in Shasta County in Northern California. It is approximately 100 miles south of the Oregon border and 160 miles north of Sacramento. Redding’s population in 2010 was approximately 90,000, which makes Redding the largest city in Shasta County, along with being the largest city in California north of Sacramento.

The City encompasses approximately 61 square miles, was founded in 1872, and incorporated in 1887. Much of the downtown area is comprised of construction dating back to the late 1800s and the early 1900s.

Soil conditions often consist of varying types of soils at different depths, leading to saturated soil conditions during winter rains and underground migration of water at all times of the year.

b. The City consists of flat lands, hills, valleys, and ridges. The flatter areas are found in the southeast portion of the City. Most of the existing commercial areas are on relatively flat land.

Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code) Residential development occurs in the hilly areas on the west and northeast portions of the City. The majority of the hills in these areas have slopes ranging from 15 to 30 percent. The steeper slopes, west and north of the City, are planned for open-space use.

Elevations are varied within the City and may be 500 feet to 1,000 feet above sea level.

c. The relatively young geological processes that have created earthquakes in California are also active today in Redding. The largest recorded earthquake in the Redding area occurred in 1940, at 5.7 on the Richter scale, and the last in 1998, with a 5.2 on the Richter scale. The ASCE 7 Hazard Tool indicates probabilistic peak ground accelerations (PGA) of 57%g based on design assumptions of a Risk Category II building and a default site soil classification of “D – Stiff Soil”. These are conservative assumptions and typical for buildings within the City’s jurisdiction.

D. Summary. The above local climatic, geologic, and topographic conditions create the potential for excessive water below building slabs, snow loads, and increased seismic hazards. There is a history of problems due to water migration up through floor slabs and into the interior space of buildings in the area as well as failures due to snow loads.

As a result of this "findings of fact," which identifies the various climatic, geological, and topographical elements, the requirements established by the City of Redding within the adopted Redding City ordinances are considered "reasonable and necessary" based on the following:

1. Climatic, geologic, and topographical conditions necessitate the control of moisture migration into buildings.

2. Geologic conditions necessitate proper design for seismic accelerations.

3. Climatic conditions necessitate proper design criteria for snow loads.

Conclusion

Local climatic, geologic, and topographic conditions impact the built environment and necessitate amendments to the California Building Standards Code.

Therefore, it is found to be reasonably necessary that the State Building Standards Code be changed or modified to mitigate the effects of the above conditions. Furthermore, California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires that the modifi cation or change be expressly marked and identified as to each finding to which it refers. Therefore, the City of Redding finds that the following table provides code sections that have been modified pursuant to the ordinance that are building standards a s defined in the Health and Safety Code Section 18909 and the associated referenced conditions or modifications due to local climatic, geological, and Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code) topographical reasons:

CBC SECTION NO. LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL, AND TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS

1608 1a
1613.3.5 2c
1613.3.5.2 2c
1807.1.5 2c
1807.1.6 2c
2308.4.6 1a

CRC SECTION NO. LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL, AND TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS

R301.2.2.1.1 2c
R313.2.1.1 1b, 2a
R313.2.2 1b, 2a
R313.2.3 1b, 2a
R404.1.4.1 2c
R404.1.4.2 2c
R506.2.3 1a, 2a

CGBC SECTION NO. LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL, AND TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS

4.505.2.1(1) 1a, 2a

Section 2. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.02 (Building Code), Section 16.02.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.02.010 - California Building Code adopted.

A. That certain document, a copy of which is on file and open for inspection in the City of Redding permit center, marked and designated as "California Building Code (CBC), 2022 Edition, Volumes 1 and 2," published by the International Code Council, is adopted as the building code of the City and is included in and made a part of this code as though set forth at length herein.

1. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, California Building Code, Appendix O, Emergency Housing, is adopted as though set forth at length herein excluding therefrom any requirement that an emergency sleeping cabin shall not be less than seventy (70) square feet of interior floor area for one oc cupant and fifty (50) square feet for each occupant in excess of one (1), and, in lieu of said requirement, establishing that an emergency sleeping cabin shall not be less than Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code) sixty-four (64) square feet of interior floor area for one occupant and one hun dred (100) square feet for two occupants.

B. Snow load CBC Section 1608 is replaced by the following:

1608.1 General. Design snow loads shall be determined by the Building Official.

C. Add the following exception to CBC Section 1613.2.5:

Exception: Structures not assigned to Seismic Design Category E or F above shall be assigned to Seismic Design Category D.

D. Add the following exception to CBC Section 1613.2.5.2:

Exception: Seismic Design Category shall be determined per exception to Section 1613.2.5.

E. Delete CBC Section 1807.1.5 Exception.

F. Delete CBC Section 1807.1.6.

G. Amend CBC Section 2308.4.6 to read:

Floor, attic, and roof framing shall be laterally supported in accordance with AF & PA NDS Section 4.4.1.2.

Section 3. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.03 (Residential Code), Section 16.03.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.03.010 - California Residential Code adopted.

A. That certain document, a copy being on file and open for inspection in the City of Redding permit center, marked and designated as "California Residential Code (CRC), 2022 Edition," published by the International Code Council, is adopted as the residential building code of the City and is included in and made a part of this code as though set forth at length herein.

1. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2.5, Ca lifornia Residential Code, Appendix AZ, Emergency Housing is adopted as though set forth at length herein excluding therefrom any requirement that an emergency sleeping cabin shall not be less than seventy (70) square feet of interior floor area for one oc cupant and fifty (50) square feet for each occupant in excess of one (1), and, in lieu of said requirement, establishing that an emergency sleeping cabin shall not be less than sixty-four (64) square feet of interior floor area for one occupant and one hun dred (100) square feet for two occupants.

Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code) B. Add the sentence "SDS shall be taken as greater than 0.50" to the end of California Residential Code Section R301.2.2.1.1.

C. Section R313.2.1.1 - Other Occupancies.

Section R313.2.1.1 is added to read as follows:

Group S occupancies constructed on private residential zoned parcels shall be designed to NFPA 13D as approved by the fire code official.

D. Section R313.2.2 – Additions.

Section R313.2.2 is added to read as follows:

Additions to any existing California Residential Building Code regulated buildings that increase the existing square footage by 50% or more shall meet the requirements for a newly constructed building. All additions to any existing California Residential Building Code regulated building with an existing automatic sprinkler system regardless of size shall be required to extend the sprinkler system into the addition per Section R313.2.

E. Section R313.2.3 – Remodels, alterations, or repairs.

Section R313.2.3 is added to read as follows:

For remodels, alterations, or repairs to an existing California residential Building Code regulated building involving demolition, removal, alteration, or repair of more than 50% of the structure, the building shall meet the requirements for a newly constructed building.

For purposes of this section, “50%” threshold shall be applied if the project involves any of the following:

1. The removal, demolition, or repair of more than 50% of the exterior weight bearing walls; or

2. The removal, demolition or repair of more than 50% of the roof structure (including the framing, sheathing, and roof covering of a building but not limited to rafters, trusses, beams, purlins); or

3. Where the removal, demolition or repair is deemed by the fire code official to be more than 50% of the structure.

F. Amend CRC Section R404.1.4.1 to read:

Masonry foundation walls. In buildings assigned to Seismic Design Category D0, D1, or D2, as established in Table R301.2(1), masonry foundation walls shall comply with this section. In addition to the requirements of Table R404.1.1(1), plain masonry foundation walls shall comply with the following:

Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code)

1. Wall heights shall not exceed 4 feet (1219 mm).

2. Unbalanced backfill height shall not exceed 3 feet (914 mm).

3. Minimum nominal thickness for plain masonry foundation walls shall be 8 inches (203mm).

4. Masonry stem walls shall have a minimum vertical reinforcement of one No. 3 (No. 10) bar located a maximum of 4 feet (1219mm) on center in grouted cells.

5. Vertical reinforcement shall be tied to the horizontal reinforcement in the footings.

Foundation walls in buildings assigned to Seismic Design Category D0, D1 or D2, as established in Table R301.2(1), supporting more than 3 feet (914 mm) of unbalanced backfill or exceeding 4 feet (1219 mm) in heights shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 or NCMA TR68-A. Masonry foundation walls shall have two No. 4 (No. 13) horizontal bars located in the upper 12 inches (305mm) of the wall.

G. Amend CRC Section R404.1.4.2 to read:

R404.1.4.2 Concrete foundation walls. In buildings assigned to Seismic Design Category D0, D1 or D2, as established in Table R301.2(1), concrete foundation walls that support light-frame walls shall comply with this section, and concrete foundation walls that support above-grade concrete walls shall comply with ACI 318, ACI 332 or PCA 100 (see Section R404.1.3). In addition to the horizontal reinforcement required by Table R404.1.2(1), plain concrete walls supporting light-frame walls shall comply with the following:

1. Wall height shall not exceed 4 feet (1219 mm).

2. Unbalanced backfill height shall not exceed 3 feet (914 mm).

3. Minimum thickness for plain concrete foundation walls shall be 6 inches (152 mm).

Foundation walls supporting more than 2 feet (1219 mm) of unbalanced backfill or exceeding 3 feet (2438 mm) in height shall be provided with horizontal reinforcement in accordance with Table R404.1.2(1), and not less than No. 4 (No. 13) vertical bars at a spacing not exceeding 48 inches (1219 mm).

H. Amend the first sentence of CRC Section R506.2.3 to read:

Vapor retarder. A 15-mil polyethylene or approved equivalent vapor retarder with joints lapped not less than 6 inches (152 mm) shall be placed between the concrete floor slab and the base course or the prepared subgrade where no base course exists.

Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code) Section 4. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.04 (Mechanical Code), Section 16.04.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.04.010 - California Mechanical Code adopted.

A. That certain document, a copy being on file and open for inspection in the City of Redding permit center, marked and designated as "California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition," is adopted as the mechanical code of the City and is included in and made a part of this code as though set forth at length herein.

B. As an amendment to the California Mechanical Code, Sections 104.3.2 and 104.5 and Table 104.5 regarding fees are deleted from this code.

Section 5. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.05 (Plumbing Code), Section 16.05.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.05.010 - California Plumbing Code adopted.

A. That certain document, a copy of which is on file in the City of Redding permit center, marked and designated "California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition," is adopted as the plumbing code of the City, and is included in and made a part of this code as though fully set forth at length herein.

B. As an amendment to the California Plumbing Code, Sections 104.3.2 and 104.5 and Table 104.5 regarding fees is are deleted from this code.

Section 6. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.06 (Electrical Code), Section 16.06.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.06.010 - California Electrical Code adopted.

That certain document, a copy being on file and open for inspection in the City of Redding permit center, marked and designated "California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition," is adopted as the electrical code of the City, and is included in and made a part of this code as though set forth at length herein.

Section 7. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.07 (Energy Code), Section 16.07.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.07.010 - California Energy Code adopted.

That certain document, a copy being on file and open for inspection in the City of Redding permit center, marked and designated as "California Energy Code, 2022 Edition," published by the International Code Council, is adopted as the energy code of the City and is included in and made a part of this code as though set forth at length herein.

Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code) Section 8. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.08 (Green Building Standards Code), Section 16.08.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.08.010 - California Green Building Standards Code adopted.

A. That certain document, a copy being on file and open for inspection in the City of Redding permit center, marked and designated as "California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition," is adopted as the green building standards code of the City and is included in and made a part of this code as though set forth at length herein.

B. Amend Section 4.505.2.1 (1) to read:

A 4-inch (101.6mm) thick base of ½ inch (12.7mm) or larger clean aggregate shall be provided with a vapor barrier consisting of 15mil polyethylene sheeting, or an approved equivalent, in direct contact with concrete and a concrete mix design, which will address bleeding, shrinkage, and curling, shall be used. For additional information, see American Concrete Institute, ACI 302.2R-06.

Section 9. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.09 (Housing Code), Section 16.09.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.09.010 – International Property Maintenance Code adopted.

A. That certain document, a copy being on file and open for inspection in the City of Redding Permit Center, marked and designated as "International Property Maintenance Code, 2021 Edition," published by the International Code Council, is adopted as the housing code of the City and is included in and made a part of this code as though set forth at length herein.

B. Section 111.1 is amended as follows:

SECTION 111.1 – UNSAFE STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT Unsafe Conditions.

When a structure, premise or equipment is found by the code official to be unsafe, or when a structure is found unfit for human occupancy, or is found unlawful, such structure, premise or equipment shall be deemed immediately dangerous, dangerous, or substandard pursuant to the following provisions and the provisions of Chapter 1.15 of the Redding Municipal Code.

C. Section 111.4 is amended as follows:

SECTION 111.4 - Notice. Whenever the code official has evaluated a structure, premises or equipment under the provisions of the section, notice shall be posted in a conspicuous place in or about the structure affected by such notice and served on the owner, owner’s authorized agent or the person or persons responsible for the structures or equipment in accordance with Title 1.15 of the Redding Municipal Code.

Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code) D. Section 111.7 is amended as follows:

SECTION 111.7 - Placarding. Upon failure of the owner, owner’s authorized agent, or person responsible to comply with the notice provisions within the time given, the code official shall post on the premises or on defective equipment a placard stating the condition of the premise or equipment and a statement regarding the occupancy of the premise, operating the equipment or removing the placard.

E. Section 111.7.1 is amended as follows:

SECTION 111.7.1. The code official shall remove the placard whenever the defect or effects upon which the placarding actions were based have been eliminated. Any person who defaces or removes a placard without the approval of the code official shall be subject to the penalties provided by this code.

F. Section 111.8 is deleted.

G. Section 113.2 is deleted.

H. Section 110.4 is amended as follows:

SECTION 110.4 - Failure to comply. Any person who shall continue any work after having been served with a stop work order, except such work as that person is directed to perform to remove a violation or unsafe condition, shall be subject to citations and fines in accordance with Chapter 1.13 of the Redding Municipal Code.

Section 10. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion s of the ordinance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentenc es, clauses or phrases may be held invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 11. The passage of this ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Section 12. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause publication according to law.

Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 15th day of November, 2022, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the ____ day of ____________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

__________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

________________________________ __________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2655 (4(e)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2655 re 2022 California Building Standard Code)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Ordinance No. 2656, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) to Repeal and Reenact Chapter

2.32 (Fire Department).

Attachments
^Ordinance No. 2656
MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(f)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(f)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2656, amending Redding Municipal Code Chapter

2.32 (Fire Department) to reflect updates to outdated language and processes.

Jerrod Vanlandingham, Fire
Chief
Packet Pg. 99

ORDINANCE
NO. 2656

AN ORDINAN

CE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING REDDING
MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL)
TO REPEAL AND REENACT CHAPTER 2.32 (FIRE DEPARTMENT)
THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter 2.32 (Fire Department) is hereby repealed and reenacted with a title to read as follows:

FIRE

DEPARTMENT
Secti
ons:

2.32.010 Es
tablished.

2.32.020 Fire Chief - Appointment.

2.32.030 Fire Chief – Duties generally.

2.32.040 Power to remove property.

2.32.050 Conduct of fire department employees.

2.32.060 Substitutes for officers.

2.32.070 Training drills.

2.32.080 Use of equipment.

2.32.090 Obstructing vehicles and apparatus.

2.32.100 Injuring equipment.

Secti on 2. Title 2 of the Redding Municipal Code is amended to add Sections 2.32.010 through 2.32.100, inclusive, to Chapter 2.32 to read as follows:

2.32.010 - Established.

There is established a F ire Department for the City of Redding.

2.32.020 - Fire Chief - Appointment.

The Fire Chief shall be appointed by the C ity Manager, subject to the approval of the C ity Council.

2.32.030 - Fire Chief - Duties generally.

The Fi
re Chief is the chief executive officer of the F ire Department and is invested with the following powers:

A. To have charge of the Fire Department facilities, its apparatus and employees. The Fire Chief may make rules and regulations for the governance and management thereof. The Fire Chief shall have such other duties as may be prescribed by this Chapter or which may be imposed upon the Fire Chief from time to time by the City Manager.

First reading done: 11/15/2022 JV
For adoption on: 12/6/2022 4-0 (CM Resner absent)
CC agenda item #4(f)
Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2656 (4(f)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2656 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2)

B. To develop and maintain a range of programs and resources designed to protect the lives and property of the inhabitants of the City of Redding from all predictable risks including but not limited to: the prevention, suppression and recovery from undesired fire; injury prevention, pre -hospital emergency medical care, rescue, extrication and recovery services; the preventio n and mitigation of unplanned or the inappropriate release of hazardous materials; and community awareness, emergency preparedness and response to other dangerous conditions.

C. To make a complete annual report to the C ity Manager at a time to be determin ed by the City Manager concerning the Fire Department in general . The report shall provide a description of the condition of the Fire D epartment, make recommendations for improvements and describe the activities of the Fire D epartment during the year;

D. To have direct control, management and direction of all personnel of the Fire Department and the power to direct them to such public service in the best interest and efficiency of the department;

E. To enforce the rules and regulations of the City of Red ding and its Fire Department and to suspend or terminate from employment any subordinate employee in such a manner as is provided herein or as provided through collective bargaining ;

F. To exercise command over the Fire D epartment at emergency incidents a nd over all equipment belonging to it;

G. To extinguish all fires with the least possible danger to life and property and prevent unnecessary damage at fires;

H. To see that the premises on which fires occur are left in such condition that they will not rekindle and cause further damage to life and property;

I. To make a complete record of each incident , investigation of each fire, keeping a record of and determining the cause, amount of loss to buildings and contents, the number and description of each building destroyed together with the names of the owners and occupants;

J. It is the duty of the Fire Chief to see that all provisions of this Chapter and Chapter

9.20 are enforced, and for this purpose and while in the discharge of these duties, the Fire Chief shall be vested with the powers of a peace officer;

K. While acting in the line of duty, to blockade any street and remove any persons or property therefrom, to insure efficient working of firefighters and equipment and to prevent injury to life and property;

L. P reserve order at all emergency incidents , and shall, whenever proper or necessary, call upon the Chief of Police, or any other peace officer, to preserve order and to make arrests, and to prevent interference with lawful orders or with firefighters.

Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2656 (4(f)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2656 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2)

2.32.040 - Power to remove property.

The Fire Chief, or Fire Chief's designee in command, shall have the power to cause the removal of any property, whenever it shall become necessary to the preservation of such property in an emergency, or to protect adjoining property. It is unlawful for any person to refuse to obey or hinder any order given pursuant to this Section.

2.32.050 - Conduct of fire department employees.

Firefighters must conduct themselves in a manner that reflects positively on the department.

Firefighters will exercise professionalism, competence, respect and loyalty in the performance of their duties and use information, confidential or otherwise, gained by virtue of their position, only to benefit those that they serve.

2.32.060 - Substitutes for officers.

The Fire Chief shall designate the order of succession of officers so that the designation shall be clear in the absence of superiors. The superior officer shall take full charge at emergency incidents if arriving there before the chief officers and shall report to them in person upon their arrival, the condition of affairs.

2.32.070 - Training drills.

Regular drills and training for the F ire Department shall be conducted and carried on under the direction and supervision of the fire chief or some responsible officer appointed by the Fire Chief.

2.32.080 - Use of equipment.

A. It is unlawful for any person not a member of, or connected with, t he Fire Department, except emergency employees of the City, to ride on or use the apparatus or equipment of the department except as authorized by the F ire Chief or other officer of the Fire Department.

B. No part of the Fire Department apparatus of the City of Redding shall be taken out of the city limits without permission of the Fire Chief or the City Manager. No part of the equipment of the Fire Department shall be loaned to any person. No part of the Fire Department apparatus of the City of Redding s hall be taken from the fire station except for the purpose of responding to emergencies or reports of emergencies; department training; public relations or education; public assistance; repair of equipment, or in cases where the equipment is needed to keep the equipment and crew available for immediate response, except on permission of the Fire Chief or the City Manager.

Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2656 (4(f)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2656 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2)

2.32.090 - Obstructing vehicles and apparatus.

No person shall willfully or carelessly allow any vehicle in his /her control to obstruct the apparatus of the F ire Department. Upon the approach of any vehicle or apparatus of the F ire Department answering an alarm of fire or emergency call, and sounding a bell or siren, the driver of any vehicle shall drive as close as possible to the right curb and stop. The driver of any vehicle shall not follow the Fire Department vehicle within three hundred (300) feet. No vehicle except by direction of an engineer of the F ire Department or other officer of the fire department shall approach, park or operate within three hundred feet of a fire, fire equipment or appurtenances thereto at any time.

2.32.100 - Injuring equipment.

No person shall willfully injure any engine house, hose, engine or any other apparatus or drive over any hose of the F ire Department.

Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases may be held invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 4. The passage of this ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause its publication according to law.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 15th day of November , 2022, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the ____ day of __________, 20 22, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ _________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, Cit y Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2656 (4(f)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2656 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Ordinance No. 2657, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code) by amending Sections 9.20.010 (Adoption), 9.20.020 (Title), 9.20.030 (Supplemental Rules, Regulations and Standards), 9.20.040 (Fire Prevention Division), 9.20.050 (Self -Inspection), 9.20.060 (Appeals),

9.20.070 (Violation Penalties), 9 .20.080 (Enforcement – Citation Authority ), 9.20.090 (Fees),

9.20.100 (Open Burning, Recreational Fires, and Outdoor Fireplaces), 9.20.110 (Fire Apparatus Access Roads), 9.20.120 (Premises Identification), 9.20.130 (Fire Hydrants), 9.20.140 (Fire Protection Systems), 9.20.150 (Existing Buildings) , 9.20.160 (High-Piled Combustible Storage),

Attachments
^Ordinance No. 2657
MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4(g)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9 regarding the 2022 California Fire Code and adoption of the 2021 International Fire Code.

Jerrod Vanlandingham, Fire
Chief
Packet Pg. 104
1 O
RDINANCE NO. 2657
AN O
RDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 9
(HEALTH AND SAFETY), CHAPTER 9.20 (FIRE CODE) BY AMENDING SECTIONS 9.20.010 (ADOPTION), 9.20.020 (TITLE), 9.20.030 (SUPPLEMENTAL RULES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS),

9.20.040 (FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION), 9.20.050 (SELF -INSPECTION),

9.20.060 (APPEALS), 9.20.070 (VIOLATION PENALTIES), 9 .20.080 (ENFORCEMENT – CITATION AUTHORITY), 9.20.090 (FEES), 9.20.100 (OPEN BURNING, RECREATIONAL FIRES, AND OUTDOOR
FIREPLACES), 9.20.110 (FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS), 9.20.120 (PREMISES IDENTIFICATION), 9.20.130 (FIRE HYDRANTS), 9.20.140 (FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS), 9.20.150 (EXISTING BUILDINGS),

9.20.160 (HIGH -PILED COMBUSTIBLE STORAGE), 9.20.170 ( FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION), 9.20.180
(REGULATIONS FOR FIREWORKS), 9.20.200 (REFERENCED
STANDARDS), 9.20.210 (APPENDIX B – FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS), 9.20.220 (APPENDIX C – FOOTNOTE ADDITIONS), AND 9.20.230 (APPENDIX D) , AND ADDING SECTION 9.20.195 (FLAMMABLE A ND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID STORAGE) TO THE

REDDING MUNICIPAL CODE
T
HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

S ection 1 . Findings of fact and need for changes or modifications to the State Building Code because of local conditions are hereby adopted as follows: The passage of this ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

A. Changes or Modifications : Pursuant to Section 17958.5, 17958.7 and 18941.5 of the State of California Health and Safety Code, the City of Redding and its ordinanc e adopting and amending the 2022 edition of the California Fire Code changes or modifies certain provisions of the State Building Standards Code as it pertains to the regulation of buildings used for human habitation.

B. Findings: Pursuant to Sections 17958.5, 17958.7 and 18941.5 of the State of California Health and Safety Code, the City of Redding has determined an d finds the changes or modifications are needed and are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological and topographic conditions.

C. Local Conditions: Local conditions have an adverse effect on the prevention of fires, earthquake damage, and the potential for life and property loss, making necessary First reading done: 11/15/2022 JV
For adoption on: 12/6/2022 4-0
CC agenda item #4(g)
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

2 changes or modifications to the California Fire Code and the State Building Standards Code in order to establish and maintain an environment which will provide to the community the desirable level of fire and life safety protection.

Below are listed adverse local climatic, geological and topographic conditions:

1. Climatic:

a. Precipitation: The normal rainfall for the City of Redding is approximately 33.6 inches annually. Winter storms are responsible for the heaviest intensity of precipitation, with two -thirds of the rain coming between December and March, and 15 percent between April and June.

b. Relative humidity: The average humidity for the Redding area is approximately 25 per cent. It drops to well below 15 percent during the summer months and occasionally even lower due to the dry, hot and windy days.

c. Temperature: Summer sunshine is in abundance in the Redding area, with over 39 days a year with temperatures of 100 degrees or higher. The northern California valley sees approximately 200 days of clear skies, with May thru September having temperature ranges between 95 and 115 degrees.

d. Winds: Winds play a major role in the Redding climatological makeup.

During the summer periods, May through September, the area receives dry zonal north winds allowing the humidity to drop to our 10 to 15 percent levels, which greatly adds to the potential of a conflagration hazard due to our urban wildland interface. The wind veloc ities are generally 5 to 17 mph in range. Gusts will bring the wind range up to 30 to 40 mph, particularly in the summer months.

e. Due in part to the winter and spring rains, we generally experience an extensive growth of vegetation in the spring whi ch dries out each summer creating hazardous fuel conditions. This, coupled with our heavy existing fuels of Manzanita and buck brush, equates to an explosive fire potential during the summer months.

Redding’s water supply comes partially from the Sacra mento River and additionally from wells which are predominately located in the southeast area of the City and interconnected with the grided main system. During the summer months, we experience lower levels of water supply and the additionally scarce wate r supplies during this period cause normal fire hydrant flushing and maintenance to be severely restricted, if not fully curtailed. Due to the dependency on sub-surface water supplies, recharged with winter and spring rains, the system capacity is always a concern.

Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

3 This fact is paramount in the amendment for fire sprinklers within the City of Redding, in that, early detection and extinguishment through automatic fire sprinklers is unsurpassed in preventing major fire operations; and consequently, the appl ication of tens of thousands of gallons of water to control and extinguish a major conflagration, especially during dry summer months when water supply is at a shortage.

f. Summary: Our local climatic conditions affect the acceleration, intensity and siz e of fire in our community. Times of little or no rainfall, low humidity and high temperatures over extended periods create extremely hazardous conditions, particularly as it relates to our commercial occupancies and urban interface areas with wood shake and shingle roof fires and conflagrations. The winds experienced in our area can have a tremendous impact on our wildland and structure fires with close proximity to one another. Winds can carry sparks and burning brands to other structures or wildland a reas, thus spreading the fire and causing the conflagration. In building fires, winds can literally force fires back into the building and create a blow torch effect, in addition to preventing “natural” ventilation and cross ventilation efforts in controlling the fire.

2. Geological and Topographic:

a. The fire environment of a community is primarily a combination of two factors; the area’s physical geographic characteristics and historic pattern of urban/suburban development. These two factors alone and combined create a mixture of environments which ultimately determine the area’s fire protection needs.

The City of Redding is located in Shasta County in northern California. It is approximately 100 miles south of the Oregon border and 160 miles north of Sacrament o. Redding’s population in 2016 was app roximately 95,000, which makes Redding the largest city in Shasta County, along with being the largest city in California north of Sacramento.

Being situated at the far north end of the Sacramento Valley, where the valley meets the foothills of the Cascade Mountain Range, Redding is surrounded by mountains to the west, north and east. The most distinctive geological feature in the area is the Sacramento River which flows through the City in a gene ral north/south direction. Several creeks also run through the planning area from the west and east. These creeks function as tributaries to the Sacramento River. Some have carved gullies and ravines with depths up to 200 feet, mainly on the western side of the City.

The City of Redding is approximately 61 square miles and was founded in 1872 and incorporated in 1887, at the northern terminus of the California and Oregon Railroad. Much of Redding’s downtown area is comprised of construction dating ba ck to the late 1800's and early 1900's. Balloon construction, lack of accessibility and buildings built too close together greatly add to the extension problem inherent to our area.

Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

4 The beginning of construction of Shasta Dam in 1938 provided a stimulus for growth in Redding. The construction boom after World War II bolstered the lumber industry, which became the mainstay of Redding’s economy. In more recent years, government, retail trade, construction and tourism have become more significant activities as the lumber industry has declined. Redding has become a major regional center for shopping, health care, education and government.

Because of the size of the City of Redding, the characteristics of the fire environment changes from one location to the next. Therefore, the City has not one, but a number of fire environments, each of which has its individual fire protection needs. The City has eight staffed fire stations to service our area. The service area for the City of Redding has a varied and rugged topography and vegetation cover. A conglomeration of lower flat lands, hills, canyons and ridges make up the terrain. Development has occurred in all areas, with a vast majority of the residential growth in the past three decades being in the hil ls and ridges interfaced with the wildland. Commercial development has occurred almost exclusively in the flat lands.

Redding is bisected by Interstate 5, a major north/south freeway, which connects Redding with major metropolitan areas such as Portland a nd Sacramento. State highways 299, 273 and 44 also pass through Redding, connecting the City with the Pacific Coast and the state of Nevada. The main north/south line of the Union Pacific Railroad runs through the community as well.

b. Seismic location: The relatively young geological processes that have created earthquakes in California are also active still today in Redding.

The largest recorded earthquake occurred in 1940, at 5.7 on the Richter scale, and the last in 1998, with a Richter scale of approximately 5.2. Fire following an earthquake has the potential of causing greater loss of life and damage than the earthquake itself. Additionally, hazardous materials, particularly toxic gases, could pose a threat to the largest number in the Redding area.

c. Size and population: The City of Redding covers approximately 61 square miles, with an urba n population of approximately 95,000. Redding is the largest city north of Sacramento.

d. Topography: The City service area is a conglomeration of f lat lands, hills, valleys and ridges. The flatter areas are found in the southeast portion of the City. Most of the existing commercial areas are on relatively flat land.

Residential development is being constructed in the hill areas on the west and northeast of the City of Redding. The majority of the hills in these areas have sloping ranges from 15 to 30 percent. The steeper slopes, west and north of the City, are planned for open space use.

Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

5 Elevations are varied within the City and may be 500 f eet to 1,000 feet above sea level.

e. Vegetation: The City of Redding has a dryer, arid, Mediterranean- type climate that produces vegetation that can survive long dry summer months such as oak, brush and pine pyrophytes. The south and west facing exposures have a build- up of oak trees and Manzanita, and the north facing slopes are more heavily wooded with pine, Manzanita and other brush vegetation.

Expansion of the residential community into areas of heavier vegetation has resulted in homes being in close proximity to dense natural foliage.

Often times, such subdivisions are completely surrounded by the highly combustible vegetation, compounding the fire problem from a conflagration point of view.

f. Summary: The above local geological and topographic conditions increase the magnitude, exposure and accessibility problems in fire hazard presented to the City of Redding. As a result of this “findings of fact,” which identifies the various climatic, geological and topographical elements, the r equirements established by the City of Redding within the adopted Redding City ordinances are considered “reasonable and necessary” based on the following:

(1) Limited staffing to control extraordinary fire conditions, i.e., conflagration potential associated with non-rated roofing materials and/or non- sprinklered structures where rapid catastrophic fire spread can occur because of climatic conditions.

(2) Need to reduce “life loss” potential, notably that associated with fires in single/multiple resid ential and commercial properties through using the logic that “fires that either do not occur or kept small through the use of automatic fire sprinkler systems, are fires where excessive use of staff, equipment and resources will not be required.”

Conclusion:

Local climatic, geological and topographic conditions impact fire prevention efforts, and the frequency, spread, acceleration, intensity and size of fire involving buildings in this community.

Further, the impact of potential damage to all structure s from earthquake and subsequent fire.

Therefore, it is found to be reasonably necessary the California Fire Code and the State Buildings Standards Code be changed or modified to mitigate the effects of the above conditions.

Furthermore, California Healt h and Safety Code section 17958.7 requires the modification or change be expressly marked and identified as to each finding to which it refers. Therefore, the City of Redding finds that the following table provides code sections that have been modified pursuant to the ordinance which are building standards as defined in the Health and Safety Code section 18909 and the associated referenced conditions or modifications due to local climatic, Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

6 geological and topographical reasons:

CFC Section No. Local Climatic, Geological and Topographical Conditions 505 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
507 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
901 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
903 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
905 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
907 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
912 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
3206 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
3310 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
5601 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
Chapter 80 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
Appendix B 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d
Appendix C 1a, b, c, d, e, 2a, d

Section 2. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9 .20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.010, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.010 Adoption.

The 2022 California Fire Code Title 24, Part 9 of the California Code of Regulations together with Appendix Chapters 4, B, C, CC, D, E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O and standards, as well as the 2021 International Fire Code of the International Code Council; save and except such portions as are hereunder deleted, added, modified, or amended by this Chapter are hereby adopted by reference in its entirety by the City Council of the City of Redding.

Section 3. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.020, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.020 Title.

Section 101.1 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

These regulations shall be known as the Fire Code of the City of Redding, hereinafter referred to as “the fire code.”

Section 4. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.030, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.030 Supplemental rules, regulations and standards.

Section 102.7.3 of the 2021 International Fire Code is added to read as follows:

The fire code official is authorized to render interpretations of this code and to make and enforce rules and supplemental regulations and to develop Fire Prevention Standards to Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

7 carry out the application and intent of its provisions.

Section 5. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.040, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.040 Fire Prevention Division.

Section 103.2 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

1. The fire code, as adopted and amended, shall be enforced by the fire code official as appointed by the chief appointing authority of the jurisdiction.

2. Sections 103.3 is deleted.

Section 6. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.050, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.050 Self-Inspection.

Section 108.1 of the 2021 International Fire Code is added to read as follows:

1. For the purpose of providing and maintaining functions necessary for the prevention of fire and for the protection of life and property from fire and panic, the Redding Fire Department does establish a sel f-inspection program, assuring certain occupancies within the city are inspected on a periodic basis for fire safety or at the discretion of the fire code official or their designee.

2. Failure to comply will result in a twice failed inspection with the a pplication of fees as outlined in the adopted fee schedule.

Section 7. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.060, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.060 Appeals.

A. Section 111.1 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

1. Whenever the fire code official disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the decision of the chief of the bureau of fire prevention to the fire chief within thirty days from the date of the decision being appealed. The fire chief shall render a d ecision within seven days from the review or hearing of the appeal. The fire chief may affirm, reverse or modify the decision. Until a final determination is rendered by the fire chief, any decision by the chief of the bureau of fire prevention shall remain in full force and effect and shall be complied with within the time originally fixed, unless a stay is Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

8 granted by the fire chief pending his or her final determination.

2. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the fire chief pertaining to suitability of alternate materials, types of construction, or interpretation of the fire code may appeal to the board of appeals by filing a written notice with the fire chief which must state briefly therein the grounds of appeal. The fire chief shall fix a time and place for hearing such appeal within sixty days from the date notice of appeal was filed and shall give not less than five days' notice thereof to appellant and to each member of the board. The decision of the board shall be final and conclusive.

Within seve n days thereafter, exclusive of Saturday, Sunday, and holidays, the fire chief shall give notice of the decision to the appellant.

Section 8. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.070, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.070 Violation penalties.

A. Section 112.4 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

1. In addition to any other remedy the C ity may have in law or equity, a violation of the California Fire Code as adopted pursuant to Section 9.20.010, the provisions of this Chapter, and Chapters 1.14, 1.15 and 9.28 of this code that concern issues of fire prevention or fire control, the provisions of the California Building Code which concern issues of fire prevention or fire contro l or life safety, or any state statute addressing fire prevention or fire control may be enforced by means of the administrative procedures set forth in Chapters 1.13 and 1.14 of the Redding Municipal Code, a criminal citation issued in accordance with Section 9.20.080, or other remedy in law or equity permitted under the laws of the State of California.

2. The amounts of the fi nes for violations enforced by means of an administrative citation shall be set forth in the schedule of fines es tablished by resolution of the City Council.

3. Any violation of this Chapter shall be punishable as follows:

a. A violation is an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ;

b. A second violation of the same section within one year is an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed two hundred dollars; and

c. A third violation of the same section within five years of a first violation is a misdemeanor.

Section 9. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.08 0, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

9 9.20.080 Enforcement - Citation authority.

Section 112.1 of the 2021 International Fire Code is added to read as follows:

1. The fire chief, fire marshal, assistant fire marshal, battalion chiefs, fire captains, fire inspec tors, fire prevention specialist, and plans examiner ("designated officials") are authorized to issue field citations to any person whenever a designated official has reasonable cause to believe that the person has committed a violation of the California F ire Code as adopted by Section 9.20.010, the provisions of this chapter, and Chapters 1.15 and 9.28 of this code that concern issues of fire prevention or fire control, the provisions of the California Building Code which concern issues of fire prevention or fire control or life safety, or any state statute addressing fire prevention or fire control in his or her presence, and are further authorized to exercise the authority provided by Penal Code Sections

19.7 and 836.5.

2. Nothing in this section or Section 9.20.070 of this chapter shall diminish or otherwise modify the authority of persons who are empowered to enforce the Redding Municipal Code or state law because of their status as peace officers or because of other authorizing status.

Section 10. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.090, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.090 Fees.

Section 107.1 of the 2021 International Fire Code is added to read as follows:

Fees for inspection, administrative citation, and permits required by the Fire Code shall be established by resolution.

Section 11. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.100, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.100 Open burning, recreational fires, and portable outdoor fireplaces.

Section 307.1 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

1. It is u nlawful to burn uncut vegetation or weeds or to permit or cause any open burning of uncut vegetation or weeds.

2. It is unlawful to start a bonfire or to permit or cause any open burning such as a bonfire unless a special permit is first obtained from the fire code official.

Exception: burning conducted in a safe manner meeting the standards set for recreational, portable, or permanent outdoor fireplaces.

Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

10 3. Open burning meeting the standard for door/yard burning shall be allowed for the months of November and April, or as otherwise specified by the fire code official.

Exception: Fire hazard mitigation work or land clearing may be allowed through a special hazard mitigation permit issued by the fire code official, and r esidents of the Buckeye Fire Protection district shall be allowed to conduct door yard burning from November through April by standard annual permit.

4. The determination of authorized burn days and times shall be the responsibility of the Shasta County Air Quality Control District.

Exception: those fire meeting the standards set for recreational, portable, or permanent outdoor fireplaces.

5. In this connection, the fire code, official, air quality control official, or their designee may prohibit all open burning or revoke an active pe rmit when conditions are so hazardous as to justify such prohibition in their judgment.

6. Open burning of any type is expressly prohibited on paved streets or paved alleys or in the gutters thereof, at any and all times.

Section 12. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.110, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.110 Fire apparatus access roads.

A. Section 503.2.3 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

Fire apparatus access road s shall be designed and maintained to support minimum imposed loads of 75,000 pounds and shall be surfaced with an AC pavement or equivalent surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities.

B. Section 503.2.4 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

The inside turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall not be less than 30 feet, and an outside turning radius of 45 feet.

C. Section 503.2.7 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

No r oad or driveway shall have a maximum grade in excess of twelve percent (12%) unless approved by the fire code official, which may require additional fire protection measures. To accommodate unusual access constraints, a road or driveway may include grades up to 15% for distances not exceeding three hundred (300) feet.

Section 13. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.120, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

11 9.20.120 Premises identification.

A. Section 505.1 of the 2022 California Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

New buildings and tenant spaces shall have approved illuminated address numbers or building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible fr om the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall be in contrasting color with their background. Address numbers shall be Arabic numerals or alphabetical letters. Where it is impractical to install illuminated numbers due to long driveways o r other circumstances, approved reflective numbers with those properties listed above may be installed at the intersection of the driveway and road fronting the parcel.

B. Section 505.1of the 2022 California Fire Code is added to read as follows:

Numbers for one and two- family dwellings shall be a minimum of 4 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inches. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole, or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure.

C. Section 505.1 of the 2022 California Fire Code is added to read as follows:

Numbers for other than one and two- family dwellings shall be a minimum of 12 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 1 inch. Suite numbers for other than one and two- family dwellings shall be a minimum of 6 inches high with a minimum stroke width of

0.5 inches.

Exception: These requirements may be modified with the approval of the fire code official.

Section 14. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.130, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.130 Fire hydrants.

A. Section 507.5.1 of the 2022 California Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

Where a portion of the facility or building he reafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 250 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on- site fire hydrants and fire mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official.

Exception: Residential (R -3) occupancies may be located up to five hundred feet from a fire hydrant if the structure is protected with an approved fire sprinkler system.

B. 507.5.1.1 of the 2022 California Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

12 Buildings equipped with a standpipe system installed in accordance with Section 905 shall have a fire hydrant within forty (40) feet of a fire department connection (FDC), or as approved by the Fire Code Official.

Section 15. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.140, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.140 Fire protection systems.

A. Section 901.4.7 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

An approved fire pump and/or automatic sprinkler riser room shall be designed with adequate space for all equipment necessary for the installation, as defined by the manufacturer, with sufficient working space around the stationary equipment. Clearances around equipment to elements of permanent construction, including other installed equipment and appliances, shall be sufficient to allow inspection, service, repair, or replacement without removing such elements of permanent construction or dis abling the function of a required fire -resistance-rated assembly. Fire pump and automatic sprinkler system riser rooms shall be provided with an exterior access door(s) large enough to allow removal of the largest piece of equipment, as approved by the fi re code official.

The location of the fire control room shall be approved by the fire code official, and shall be labeled with durable signage provided on the exterior side of the access door.

B. Section 903.2 of the 2022 California Fire Code is added to read as follows:

An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings and structures requiring a fire flow of more than two thousand GPM as determined by Appendix B of the California Fire Code.

Exceptions:

1. Buildings separated by four-hour fire walls are allowed to be considered as separate fire flow areas.

2. Buildings separated by a minimum of 20 feet are allowed to be considered as a separate fire flow area.

C. Section 903.2 of the 2022 California Fire Code is added to read as follows:

1. Additions to existing R3 occupancy residential buildings that increase the total square footage of existing floor area by 50% or more of the existing floor area shall meet the requirements for new construction. All additions to all Group R occupancy residential buildings with an existing approved automatic sprinkler system shall be required to extend the sprinkler system into the addition.

2. Additions to an existing Group R -3 occupancy creating a required a fire flow of Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

13 more than two thousand GPM as determined by Appendix B of the California Fire Code.

D. 903.3.1 of the 2022 California Fire Code is added to read as follows:

1. Additions to existing commercial buildings that increase the total square footage of existing floor area by 25% or greater shall meet the requirements for a newly constructed building. All additions to commercial buildings with an existing approved automatic sprinkler system shall be required to extend the sprinklers into the addition.

2. Additions to existing Group R -1 occupancies that result in additional guest room(s) units shall meet the requirements for a newly constructed building.

E. Section 903.2.12 of the 2022 California Fire Code is added to read as follows:

1. For remodels, alterations or repairs to an ex isting building involving demolition, removal or repair of more than 50% of the existing structure, the building shall meet the automatic fire sprinkler requirements for a newly constructed building.

For purposes of this section, the “50%” threshold shall be applied if the project involves any of the following:

a. The removal, demolition or repair of more than 50% of the exterior weight bearing walls; or

b. The removal, demolition or repair of more than 50% of the roof structure (including the framing, sheathing, and roof covering of a building but not limited to rafters, trusses, beams, purlins); or

c. The removal, demolition or repair of more than 50% of the interior tenant improvements on a commercial building which reduces the building to a shell condition.

F. Section 903.4.2 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby added to read as follows:

Fire alarm system(s) installed as a dedicated function sprinkler system monitoring alarm(s) shall also provide notification for the purpose of initiating emerg ency action, including those systems activated solely by the fire sprinkler systems, so that occupants of the building shall be notified audibly within each suite or building division. A minimum of one notification appliance shall be located in each suite or building division in an occupied location.

G. Section 905.3.1 #2 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Standpipes shall be installed in buildings three stories or more in height, with approved Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

14 outlets on each floor above or below grade and the roof.

H. Section 907.6.6 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

1. Fire alarm systems required by this chapter or by the California Building Code shall be monitored by a Central Station Service ( UUFX) that is listed in the current edition of the UL Online Certifications Directory unless otherwise required by the California Fire Code.

2. Combination fire and burglar alarm systems are not permitted.

Exception: Group R-3 and R-3.1.

I. Section 912.2 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located within 40 feet of a city-approved fire hydrant. The fire code official shall have final approval of FDC locations.

Section 16. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.150, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.150 Existing buildings.

Section 1103.5 of the 2021 International Fire Code is hereby added to read as follows:

An approved a utomatic sprinkler system shall be provided in every existing building when one of the following conditions exists:

1. An addition to the floor area is made increasing the size of the building by 50 percent of the original square footage.

2. An addition of any size which increases the required fire flow requirement of the building to greater than 2,000 gallons per minute (gpm) as determined by Appendix B of the California Fire Code.

3. When in the opinion of the fire code official, a change of use, occup ancy, or character of a building and structure is made creating a greater hazard to life or property.

Section 17. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.160, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.160 High-piled combustible storage.

Section 3206.9 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby added to read as follows:

For high-piled storage areas of greater than 2,500 square feet of Class I -IV commodities, Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

15 or for high-piled combustible storage areas of greater t han 500 square feet of high hazard commodities, approved 2 ½- inch hose valves shall be located directly adjacent to all fire access doors.

Section 18. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.170, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.170 Fire safety during construction and demolition.

Section 3311.1 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby added to read as follows:

Buildings under construction shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed at the entry point of each fire access road.

Section 19. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.180, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.180 Regulations for fireworks.

Section 5601.1.3 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

1. It is unlawful for any person, firm, association, or corporation to possess, transport, discharge, or ignite any firecrackers, sky rockets, snap caps, detonating contrivance, bomb, or fireworks of any kind or description within the boundaries of the city of Redding without first obtaining a permit for possessing or discharging and igniting such devices from the city.

2. The possession, storage, handling, sale, and use of explosives, explosive materials, and fireworks for public displays shall comply with the California Fire Code.

Section 20. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.195. is added to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.195 Flammable and Combustible Liquid Storage.

The storage of flammable and combustible liquids is regulated as follows:

A. 2021 International Fire Code Section 5706.2.4.4 – Storage of class I and II liquids in above-ground tanks outside of buildings is prohibited within the limits established by law are established as the limits of the city of Redding.

B. 2021 International Fire Code Section 5706.4 – New bulk plants for flammable or combustible liquids shall be permitted only in G-1 and H-1 industrial districts where such use is permitted by a use permit and meets the requirements of Section 5706.4 et seq. of the California Fire Code.

Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

16 C. 2021 International Fire Code Section 5806.2 – The outdoor storage location(s) in which flammable cryogenic fluids can be stored is limited to H-1 zones in the city of Redding.

D. 2021 International Fire Code Section 6104.2 – The limits, in which the bulk storage of liquefied petroleum gas is restricted, are established as the corporate limits of the city of Redding, except for the G -1 and H -1 industrial districts, where such storage may be permitted only with a use permit. Other storage and use shall be according to the California Fire Code. Tanks dispensing liquefied petroleum gas shall be on a concrete pad.

Section 21. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.200, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.200 Referenced standards.

Chapter 80 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby amended as follows:

1. NFPA 13D-16 Revise Section 8.3.2 as follows: Bathroom(s), regardless of size, shall be provided with sprinkler coverage.

2. NFPA 13R-16 Revise Section 6.6.2 as follows: Bathroom(s), regardless of size, shall be provided with sprinkler coverage.

Section 22. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.210, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.210 Appendix B - Fire flow requirements for buildings.

Table B105-2 of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Automatic Sp rinkler
System
(Design Standard)
Minimum Fire-Flow
(gallons per minute)
Flow Duration
(hours)
No automatic sprinkler
system
Value in Table
B105.1(2)
Duration in Table
B105.1(2)
Section 903.3.1.1 of the
California Fire Code
50% of the value in
Table B105.1(2)a
Duration in Table
B105.1(2) at the reduced flow rate
Section 903.3.1.2 of the
California Fire Code
50% of the value in
Table B105.1(2)b
Duration in Table
B105.1(2) at the reduced flow rate
a. The reduced fire-flow shall be not less than 1,000 gallons per minute. b. The reduced fire-flow shall be not less than 1,500 gallons per minute.

Section 23. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.220, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

17 9.20.220 Appendix C—Footnote additions.

Table C102.1 footnotes “f” and “g” of the 2022 California Fire Code are amended to read as follows:

1. Table C102.1 Footnote f: Fire hydrants shall be located within 40 feet of the FDC, or as approved by the fire code official.

2. Table C102.1 Footnote g: is deleted.

Section 24. Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.20 (Fire Code), Section 9.20.230, is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.20.230 Appendix D.

A. Section D103.2 of Appendix D of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 12 percent in grade.

Exception: Grades steeper than 12 percent, but not more than 15 percent as approved by the fire code official.

B. Section D103.3 of Appendix D of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

The minimum turning radius shall be an inner radius of 30 feet and an outer radius of 45 feet.

C. Section D103.4 of the 2021 International Fire Code is added to read as follows:

Dead-end fire apparatus access ro ads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with the local agency requirements for public streets or as approved by local standards.

D. Section D103.6 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signs that meet California Vehicle Code and fire department standards.

E. Section D104.2 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to delete the exception and read as follows:

Buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads.

Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

18 F. Section D106.1 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to delete the exception and read as follows:

Multiple-family residential projects having more than 50 dwelling units shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads.

G. Section D106.2 of the 2021 International Fire Code is deleted.

H. Section D107.1 of the 2021 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows:

Developments of one or two -family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads.

I. Section D107.1 exceptions set forth in the 2021 International Fire Code are deleted.

Section 25. The passage of this ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Q uality Act, and therefore is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Section 26. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases may be held invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 27. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption, or January 1, 2023 whichever occurs last, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause its publication according to law.

Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

19 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 15th day of November, 2022; and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the ____ day of ___________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

_______________________________ _____________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2657 (4(g)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2657 re Amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following actions relative to funding and implementing an online automated solar permitting program:
(1) Approve submittal of application to the California Energy Commission for a California Automated Permit Processing Program Grant in the amount of $60,000; and (2) Authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, appropriate funds should the grant be awarded, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. If the California Automated Permit Processing Program (CalAPP) grant is awarded, there will be a positive impact of $ 60,000 to the Development Services budget to cover the cost of implementing the online automated permitting platform. There is no grant match requirement.

Alternative Action

The City Council may choose to not approve the application for the grant funds.

Background/Analysis

Senate Bill 379 was signed in September 2022 and requires most California cities and counties to implement an online automated permitting platform that verifies code compliance in real time for residential solar energy and energy storage systems. The bill prescribes a compliance schedule for satisfying the se requirements depending on population size. For a jurisdiction such as Redding, with a population greater than 50,000, compliance is required by September 30, 2023.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.4(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.4(a) Approve submittal of application for California Automated Permit Processing Program (CalAPP) Grant
Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 124
Report to Redding City Council November 22, 2022
Re: 4.4(a)--Approve submittal of application for CalAPP Grant Page 2

Additionally, Senate Bill 129 (Skinner, Budget Act of 2021) appropriated $20 million in funding to the California Energy Commission (CEC) to provide funding for California cities, counties, or cities and counties, to establish online automated solar permitting. Applying for the CalAPP grant funding will help the City of Redding develop and i mplement an automated permitting platform in order to comply with SB 379 as well as enhance the existing building permitting processes.

Environmental Analysis

This is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 125

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Request for Proposal s No. 5289 for Engineering Services for the design of a new 115/12kV Electric Substation in East Redding:
(1) Approve the Consulting and Professional Service s Contract with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. , in the amount of $341,900 for engineering services to design a new 115/12kV substation; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements or documents required to complete the stated scope of work.

Fiscal Impact

Costs associated with Request for Proposals No. 5289 (RFP) have been previously authorized by the 29th Amendment to the City Budget Resolution 2021-078, as approved and adopted on March 1, 2022. This amendment appropriated $600,000 for engineering and design services to build a new substation in East Redding. While additional engineering and design services will be required to complete the new substation, the additional costs will not exceed the $600,000 appropriated amount.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could reject the request to award the RFP to Ulteig Engineers, Inc., (Ulteig) and provide staff with an alternative direction.

Background/Analysis

Per established engineering standards, the City of Redding (City) will need to add a substation to maintain service reliability as growth adds new electrical loads. As an additional benefit, the new substation will provide a secondary feed to the City's Stillwater Waste Water Treatment Plant, thereby increasing the electric reliability at the treatment plant. The initial cost estimate for this substation is $6.5 to $7 million.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.

Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 126
Report to Redding City Council November 30, 2022
Re: 4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc. Page 2

On March 1, 2022, the Council approved the 29 th Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 2021-78, appropriating $600,000 for engineering and design services to build a new substation in East Redding.

On April 20, 2022, the City’s Purchasing Department posted a nationwide RFP (Schedule 5289).

On June 3, 2022, the Purchasing Department received five proposals. The respondents were:

NEI Electric Po wer Engineering, Burns & McDonnell, Ulteig, Mangan Inc., and Electrical Consulting Inc.

A panel of five subject matter experts independently evaluated each proposal per the City's Purchasing Policy. On July 20, 2022, the City invited three respondents to virtual selection interviews. Using this process, the review panel identified Ulteig as the highest -scoring candidate.

Upon completion of this project in June 2023, the consultant will deliver a set of construction documents that the City can utilize as p art of a future substation construction bid package. At that time, staff will develop recommendations for the next steps based on updated load growth forecasts, distribution system capacity, equipment lead times, and many other factors.

Staff delayed the original estimated timeline for this project due to unstable economic conditions and will return to the Council with an updated recommendation for any future actions related to project construction.

Environmental Review

On April 18, 2006, with recomme ndation from the Planning Commission, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2006 -058 to certify and approve the Stillwater Business Park Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), adopt the Mitigation and Monitoring Program, make Findings of Significant Effect s and approve a Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and adopt the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and prepare a Record of Decision pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The development of a new substation was included in the Stillwater Business Park FEIR-FEIS, and all potential environmental impacts were evaluated. Approval of the Consulting and Professional Services Agreement is not a project as defined under th e CEQA, and no further action is required at this time.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21st Century – "Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today's residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to ma ke better decisions today.".
• Economic Development – "Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community."
Packet Pg. 127
Report to Redding City Council November 30, 2022
Re: 4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc. Page 3

Attachments
^RFP 5289 SWBP Sub design_Vendor Recommendation
Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc.

Previous Staff Report 3 -1-22 item no. 4.5(a) Budget Resolution appropriating $600,000 for engineering and design services to build a new substation in East Re 2006 Staff Report and Resolution
Packet Pg. 128
Memo

From Josh Scott, Electrical Engineering Supervisor
To Amber Edenburn, City of Redding Purchasing Officer
Subject Results of RFP 5289, Vendor Recommendation
Date 08/18/2022

On April 20, 2022, the City of Redding- Electric department solicited multiple engineering firms and publicly posted RFP # 5289, “Engineering Services for the Design of a New 115/12kV Electric Substation”.

The cutoff date and time for receiving questions regarding this bid was 5 PM on Wednesday, May 18th.

Various questions were asked and Addendum #1 was posted publicly on May 20th.

On Friday, June 3rd, 2022, the City of Redding – Electric Department received five (5) proposals in response to RFP # 5289. This memo documents the selection process used to evaluate these proposals.

Based on this process, the selection committee recommends moving forward with Ulteig.

The selection process was executed in two steps. A description of each step and the outcome is included below. This contract will be funded with JO # 9238-04.

Step 1: Independent Evaluation of Each Submittal
The five proposals were scored by a panel of stakeholders consisting of the following staff: Assistant Engineering – Public Works, Electric Program Supervisor – Substations, two Electrical Engineering Supervisors, and Electric Utility Engineer. A total of five (5) city staff members reviewed and scored these proposals.

The proposals were first reviewed and independently scored based on technical materials and then given independent scores (see Attachment #1). Then the cost proposals were reviewed independently and added to the technical scores. The combined scores produced the respondent’s rank,1-5 (1 being the best), and the following table:

Table 1: Proposal Scores
Respondent Average Rank Average Score
1 NEI Electric Power Engineering 1.8 121.2
2 Burns & McDonnell 2 118.8
3 Ulteig 2.2 118.2
4 Mangan Inc 4 105.4
5 Electrical Consulting Inc 4.6 108.6
Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: ^RFP 5289 SWBP Sub design_Vendor Recommendation (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Memo

Step 2: Selection Interviews
Panel interviews were conducted via webinar for the top three respondents for this RFP. These interviews were all held on the same day Wednesday, July 20th. Each respondent was provided with the exact same list of interview questions on Monday, July 18th. The interview questions are included in Attachment #2. The interviews provided an opportunity to meet the teams and gain insights and clarification regarding their proposals. The format for the interviews was as follows for each respondent:
• 5-10 Minutes to perform introductions.
• 35-45 Minutes for the vendor to give an Overview/Introductory presentation.

Step 3: Final Scores
Based on the updated information provided in the selection interviews, the selection committee members updated their scores to generate final scores. The final scores for the three respondents are shown in table 2.

Table 2: Final Scores
Respondent Average Rank Average Score
1 Ulteig 1 123.2
2 NEI Electric Power Engineering 2.2 119
3 Burns & McDonnell 3.4 112

As shown in Table 2, the selection committee has identified Uleig, as the highest scoring candidate and recommends moving forward with contract development and execution.

Interviews were conducted with references as part of this step. Reference questions are included in Attachment #3.

This contract will need to be approved by City Council.

Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: ^RFP 5289 SWBP Sub design_Vendor Recommendation (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Memo

Attachment 1: Proposal Evaluation Sheet

Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: ^RFP 5289 SWBP Sub design_Vendor Recommendation (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Memo

Attachment 2: Interview Questions

1. Why are you interested in contracting with REU for this project?

2. What sets your firm apart from other respondents?

3. Can you elaborate on the assigned team’s experience with this type of project?

4. Can you clarify the REU team’s responsibilities assumed in the project’s scope of work?

5. What is the most crucial piece of a successful substation design project?

6. Do you anticipate any roadblocks to the design (and construction) of this substation?

7. Can you review your fee structure and identify any opportunities for cost reduction and identify any factors that could increase the cost of services as described?

Attachment 3: Reference Check Questions
1) Please describe the work (Company Name) has done for you. 2) What are/were the goals? Were they successful?
3) Has (Company Name) been successful in implementing sounds design and project management practices?
4) How well did this vendor meet your requirements and expectations? Were there any instances where you were let down or challenges with the project? 5) Who did you work with at the company? (to determine if it is the same staff we are working with)
6) On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied are you with the skills of the staff that participated on your project?
7) Would you hire this firm again?

Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: ^RFP 5289 SWBP Sub design_Vendor Recommendation (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Consulting & Professional Services Agreement with Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 29th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $600,000 for engineering and design services to build a new substation in East Redding.

Fiscal Impact

The cost of building a substation on the east side of Redding was not included in Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) Fiscal Year 2021 -23 Biennial Budget. REU has adequate reserves to fund $600,000 of engineering and design service costs for thi s capital project. Construction costs associated with the completion of this capital project, while preliminary, are expected to be significant and will be brought to the City Council (Council) at a later date for consideration.

Alternative Action

The Council could choose not to adopt the resolution appropriating the funds as requested and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

Future development plans on the east side of Redding necessitate REU building a new substation. This recom mendation is based on established engineering standards addressing system capacity and service reliability as Redding adds new load. As an additional benefit, the new substation will provide a secondary power feed to the City’s Stillwater Waste Water Treatment Plant, which will increase electric reliability at the treatment plant. The initial cost estimate of this substation is $6.5-$7 million.

Based on current construction estimates, REU expects to have the substation energized in 2025.

MEETING DATE: March 1, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.5(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(a)--Budget Resolution appropriating $600,000 for engineering and design services to build a new substation in East Redding.

Nathan Aronson, Assistant
Director of Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 80Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 3-1-22 item no. 4.5(a) Budget Resolution appropriating $600,000 for engineering and design services to build Report to Redding City Council February 24, 2022
Re: 4.5(a)--Budget Resolution for Substation Engineering/Design Services Page 2

The estimated timeline is as follows:
• March 2022: The Council considers adopting a Budget Resolution appropriating $600,000 to initiate a Request for Proposals (RFP) for an engineering and design services contract.
• May 2022: The RFP for engineering and design services is awarded by the Council. • September 2022: The Council considers a funding request to initiate the procurement of major materials and a public works construction contract of approximately $6,000,000. • Spring 2023: Recommendation to award the public works contract and purchase major materials submitted to the Council.
• Spring 2024: Public works construction begins.
• Spring 2025: Substation is energized.

REU will keep the Council informed of any project cost or schedule changes.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

Attachments
Resolution
Packet Pg. 81Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 3-1-22 item no. 4.5(a) Budget Resolution appropriating $600,000 for engineering and design services to build Resolution No. 2022 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 29TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078
APPROPRIATING $600,000 FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES BUILD A NEW SUBSTATION IN EAST REDDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
142 859 Electric Capital $600,000

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Beginning Balance
142-851-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance 600,000$
Increase Expenditures
142-859-4270-89 Stillwater Substation 600,000$
Total 600,000$ 600,000$

THAT the purpose is to appropriate $600,000 for engineering and design services to build a new substation in east Redding for fiscal year 2021-22.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the _________ day of ___________, 20 22 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Resolution (4.5(a)--Budget Resolution for Substation Engineering/Design Services) Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 3-1-22 item no. 4.5(a) Budget Resolution appropriating $600,000 for engineering and design services to build y!;:.~~-" ~\~;~,~
y...---.......,<:,..~,\-
CllY/, OF REDDING
INTIRNAl et1MMbN,ICA' I~,ON
Vf{ '-~~:. -": ~~//flP
DATE: April 12, 2006
E- 050- 500
FROM:

Honorable Mayor and City Council
Y'
Kurt Starman, Interim City Manager ~
TO:

SUBJECT: Agenda Item Nos. 6- 1 and 6- 2, Stillwater Business Park The next two staff reports, by Development Services Director Jim Hamilton, relate to the Stillwater Business Park. The actions requestedof the City Council, which include the adoption of the Final Environmental Impact StatementfEnvironmental Impact Report ( EISfEIR), come to the City Council with the unanimous recommendation of the Planning Commission. While the reports do a good job of explaining the specific issues that are before the City Council at this time, I did not want to let the bigger issue get lost in the technical details.

This represents a very significant step forward for Stillwater Business Park. As the Council is aware, we have been working on this project for some seven years and have been in the environmental process for six of those years. Should the Council approve the EISfEIR, this is something that should be celebrated by the City Council and the community as a major stepping stone toward construction of what has been the City Council' s No. 1 priority for a number of years.

In short, I strongly recommend that the City Council approve the staff recommendations after considering all ofthe issues in the documentation and at Tuesday' s public hearing.

Staff is scheduling a City Council workshop in mid- to late- May in order to carefully consider how to best move forward with this project, which is critical to the economic health of Redding and Shasta County, both in the near term and for many, many years into the future.

KS: RB: ts
C: lDocumenls and SettingslshanklMyDocumenlsICMICOVER- Slillwater. wpd Attachments
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) MEETING DATE 4- 18- 06

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 18, 2006
ITEM NO.

CODE: L- 01O- 075/E-050- 500
FROM: Development Services Department- Planning
SUBJECT: Public Hearing re Final Environmental Impact
Statement ( EIS) and Environmental ImpactReport
EIR) for the Stillwater Business Park; Adopt
Resolution

RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of staff and the Planning Commission that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to: ( 1) certify and approve the Stillwater Business Park Final Environmental Impact Report, adoptthe Mitigation and Monitoring Program, make Findings of Significant Effects, and approve a Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA); and ( 2) adopt the Final Environmental Impact Statement and prepare a Record of Decision pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEP A); and ( 3) appoint the City Manager or Designee to act as the Federal Certifying Officer and to sign the necessary documents to comply with Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations.

BACKGROUND
The project involves development of a medium- to large-scale business park capable of accommodating a broad range of industries near the Redding Municipal Airport. This proposal would result in an approximate 700 acre business park (Park), consisting of349 acres of developable land for professional and industrial uses. Approximately 295 acres will be protected as open space to conserve vernal pool and wetland features in the area. The project consists of proposed sites ranging from 3 to 100 acres in size and construction of a backbone road and other infrastructure connecting Rancho Road through the Park to Fig Tree Lane.

A Draft EIS/EIR was preparedand circulated for public comment and review in March 2005, and a Supplemental Draft EIS/EIR was circulated in September2005. The Final EIS 30- day public notice ended April 3 , 2006. On April 11 , 2006, the Planning Commission considered the project and recommended that the City Council certify the environmental documents and approve the project.

The Final EIS/EIR consists of the following:

Draft EIS/EIR
Supplemental Draft EIS/EIR
Comment letters and responses to comments
Revisions to the Draft EIS/EIR and Supplemental Draft EIS/EIR Mitigation Monitoring ProgramIPlan
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Report to City Council 2 April 18 , 2006
The document discusses potential significant environmental impacts in the areas of Geology and Soils; Vegetation, Wildlife, and Wetlands; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use; Cultural Resources; Aesthetics, Traffic and Circulation; Air Quality; Noise; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Population and Housing; and Public Utilities and SelVices. No other areas of significant impact have been identified since circulation of the Draft EISIEIR. The Final EISIEIR identifies feasible mitigation measures that reduce all potential environmental impactsto a less than significant level, except for one. As described in the Final EISIEIR, impacts to air quality resulting from emissions of nitrogen oxides ( Nox) during short- tenn construction activities may still be significant after implementation of feasible mitigation measures.

A separate staff report covering related actions has been preparedfor consideration by the Council at this same meeting. General Plan Amendment Application ( GPA- 2- 0I), Rezoning Application RZ- I- O1), an amendment to the ReddingMunicipal Airport ComprehensiveLand Use Plan ( CLUP), and Annexation Application ( AN- I- OI) are all discussed as they relate to the Stillwater Business Park.

The Stillwater Business Park project requiresapproval by the City Council. As the lead agency for the project, the Council must certify and approve the Final EIR, adopt a Mitigation and Monitoring Program, and make Findings of Significant Effects, as well as prepare a Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to CEQA. The Council must also adopt the Final EIS pursuant to NEP A.

The City Council has been delegatedthe role of ResponsibleEntity as required by the Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) Federal regulations. As the ResponsibleEntity, the City Council makes the decisions regarding compliance with NEP A and makes the decision to approve the project. The Council will designatea Certifying Officer as the responsible Federal official to sign the NEP A documentation.

ISSUES
The issue to be addressed by the City Council is whether or not the Final EISIEIR for the project is complete and adequately discloses and addresses the potential environmental impacts that could result from the project.

OPEN SPACEIFLOODWAY Design of the backbone road through the Park requires construction of two bridges across Stillwater Creek. Given the width of the creek floodplain along the creek, there will be roadway fill placed in the floodplain along with the bridge structure. Although designcriteria were optimized to avoid impacts to the floodplain water surface elevation, complete avoidance is not possible. As a result, there will be up to a 0. 6- foot increase in the water surface elevation upstream of the project site, affecting the upstream landowner' s property. The portion of the property affected is minimal and restricted to undevelopablelocations within the stream corridor.

ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE ALTERNATIVES
The following alternatives are offered for consideration:

1. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to:
1) certify and approve the Stillwater Business Park Final Environmental Impact Report, adopt the Mitigation and Monitoring Program, make Findings of Significant Effects, and approve a Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Report to City Council 3 April 18, 2006.

Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA); arid ( 2) adopt the Final Environmental Impact Statement and prepare a Record of Decision pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA); and ( 3) appoint the City Manager or Designee to act as the Federal Certifying Officer and to sign the necessary documents to comply with HUD regulations. ( Staff Recommendation)

2. Determine that the Stillwater Business Park Final EIS/EIR is inadequate and not take the recommended actions described in ( 1) above. Implications of this action would be that the project is delayed, including the designof the utility lines, acquisition of utility line easements and rights-of- way, and release of Federal HUD grant money.

3. Certify the Stillwater Business Park Final EIS/EIR, but do not approve the project as described.

The implications of this action would delaythe project indefinitely until the project is approved.

The design of the utility lines, acquisition of utility line easements and rights-of- way, and release of Federal HUD grant monies would be delayedalong with the project in general.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The action before the Council does not commit the City to additional expenditures. The Council' s action today is to certify and approve the required environmental documents. Future expenditures, project phasing, cost benefit analysis, and actual construction will be covered under future staff reports.

CONCLUSION
It is the conclusion of staff and the Planning Commission that the City Council should adopt the attached resolution to: ( 1) certify and approve the Stillwater Business Park Final Environmental Impact Report, adoptthe Mitigation and Monitoring Program, make Findings of Significant Effects, and approve a Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA); ( 2) adopt the Final Environmental Impact Statement and prepare a Record of Decision pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA); and ( 3) appoint the City Manager or Designeeto act as the Federal Certifying Officer and to sign the necessary documents to comply with HUD regulations.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
B. Findings of Significant Effects
C. Statement of Overriding Considerations
JO: jh
ST AF\ StillwaterBusPk- FEIS- EIR- JO- CC. wpd
c: Kurt Starman, Interim City Manager
Ranch Bachman, Interim Assistant City Manager
Nathan Cherpeski, ManagementAssistant to the City Manager Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) RESOLUTION NO. 2006-_

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

CERTIFYING AND APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

STATEMENTIREPORT EIS- EIR- I- OO

FOR THE STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Redding, as lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA), the delegatedlead agency pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEP A), and the ResponsibleEntity pursuant to the Housing and Urban Development NEP A regulations for the Stillwater Business Park Project (Project), has conducted the following environmental review for the proposed Project:

1. A Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was circulated for review and comment on March 23, 2001 and July 23, 2003; and

2. A Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ( EIS) was published in the federal register on May 11, 2004; and

3. A Notice of Availability for the Draft EIS/EIR was publishedin the federal register on February 15, 2005 and the Draft EIS/EIR was circulated for review and comment, ending on May 2, 2005; and

4. A Notice of Availability for a Supplemental Draft EIS/EIR was published in the Federal register on September30, 2005, and the SupplementalDraft EIS/EIR was circulated for public comment, ending on November 14, 2005; and

5. A series of public scoping sessions, public hearings, resource agency coordination meetings, and an open house meeting were held to accept public comments and to discuss the project; and

6. After closure of each public comment period, all comments received were summarized and addressed in writing; and

7. Written comments on the Draft EIS/EIR and SupplementalDraft EIS/EIR by State and local agenciesand individuals and responses to comments are included in the Final EIS/EIR; and

8. The Final EIS/EIR 30- day public notice was published in the Federal register on March 2, 2006, and ended on April 3, 2006; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as requiredby the CEQA and NEP A is included in the Final EIS/EIR; and
WHEREAS, the Final EIR identified potential significant impacts which will be mitigated to aless than significant level after implementation of mitigation measures; and

ITEM C, -I
ATTACHMENT APacket Pg. 183
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) WHEREAS, written Findings, incorporated herein by attachment, must be developed by the approving body as required by CEQA; and.

WHEREAS, one air quality impact cannot be mitigated to a level considered less than significant, thus a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been developedby the approving body pursuant to CEQA; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 11 , 2005, by the Planning Commission of the City of Redding, and after acceptingpublic comment and due consideration, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council make the necessary finding and take those seven actions as set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding, based upon the entire record of environmental review for the Stillwater Business Park Project, certifies that:

1. The FEIR has been completed in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and

2. The FEIR was presentedto the City Council, and the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the FEIR; and

3. The FEIR reflects the City' s independentjudgment and analysis; and

4. The FEIS meets the standards for EIS adequacyunder NEPA; and

5. The FEIS meets the standards for EIS adequacyunder the Council on Environmental Quality CEQ) NEPA regulations; and

6. The FEIS meets the standards for EIS adequacyunder the HUD regulations.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding, based upon substantial evidence in the administrative record and Final EIS/EIRfor the Stillwater Business Park, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, hereby:

1. Approves the PROPOSED ACTION - ALTERNATIVE 2 , REVISED STILLWATER SITE, as described in the Final EIR, and the Final EIS; and

2. Approves the Findings of Significant Effects; and

3. Adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations; and

4. Adopts the Mitigation and Monitoring Program; and
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

5. Adopts the Final EIS; and

6. Authorizes the City Manager to prepare and file a Record of Decision and Notice of Detennination reflecting the City' s action; and

7. Authorizes the City Manager or Designeeto act as the Certifying Official for compliance with HUD regulations.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the interest of being good stewards of the environment, in the interest of furthering efforts to conselVe important lands in and near the Stillwater Plains ConselVation Area, and in the interest of protecting those sensitive speciesand habitats that occur within that area, the City Manager is directed to use best efforts to acquire or pennanently protect lands for additional conselVation purposes, including preselVation, restoration, and/ or creation of environmentally significant habitat within the Stillwater Plains ConselVation Area or within the Stillwater Creek watershed, or as close to those areas as possible. This acquisition and/ or protection effort by the City will further the purposes of the conselVation efforts related to the Stillwater Business Park Project, with no more than five acres of this land to be credited to the Stillwater Business Park Project. The City acknowledgesthat this land is above and beyond the amount of compensatory mitigation needed as set forth in the Stillwater Business Park Final EIS/EIR.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on this day of , _, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KEN MURRAY, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

RICHARD A. DUVERNAY
City Attorney
CONNIE STROHMA YER, City Clerk By:
4- 5- 06
RESO\ CC\ Stillwater FEIS- EIRlOO- JO- CC. wpd
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Stillwater Business Park Project
SCH NO. 2001032106
Findings of Significant Effects
Introduction
The California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) requiresthat no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been completed which identifies one or more significant effects thereof unless such public agency makes one or more of the following fmdings:

1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the fmal EIR.

2. Changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding, and such changeshave been adoptedby such other agency or can and should be adoptedby such other agency.

3. Specificeconomic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR ( Cal. Pub. Res.

Code Section 21081).

CEQA further requires that where the decision of the public agency allows the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the Final EIR, but are not at least substantially mitigated, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the Final EIR or other information in the record ( Section 15093[b] of the CEQA Guidelines).

The following Findings have been submitted to the administrative record for the project by the City of Redding. They are attached to allow readers of this report an opportunity to review the potential reasons for approving the project despite the unmitigated significant effects identified in the Final EIR.

Project Description
The project proposes development of a business park through the acquisition of land, the construction of major infrastructure components, and the provision of public services and utilities to serve the development. The project proposedis the preferred alternative, Alternative 2, Revised Stillwater Site as described in the EIR. The projectsite contains approximately 700 acres, of which approximately 349 acres is developable. The site is located near the Redding Municipal Airport in Redding, California. The site is situated at the southern end of the Stillwater Plains, a large terrace landscapelocated between the Stillwater Creek drainageto the west and the Cow Creek drainageto the east. The Stillwater Mitigation Bank is adjacentto the southeastern border of the site.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park J- April 7, 2006 co
ffi
aE
I:

U
The purpose of the project is to develop a medium to large business park, which is part of a larger, ongoing program to recruit new industry and businesses. This is in direct response to economic data showing a need to enhance the economic stability and quality of life in the City of Redding (City) Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Metropolitan Statistical Area ( generally the urbanized, south- central portions of the County, including the city of Redding and its sphereof influence). Studies and real world experienceshow that the limited availability of attractive, fully developedsites is one of the main constraints to new industrial development in the area.

Prior to development, easements protecting the OpenSpacePreselVe area will be recorded. Creation of the on- site easements will protect the preselVe area and will selVe to reduce any potential growth- inducing effects of the Project by preventing the extension of roads or infrastructure. This easement will be placed along the northern and eastern borders of the core Project site to prevent connectivity to the north and east from the Project site. This easement will not prevent and is not intended to prevent adjacent landowners from developing their own properties. Once all permits are obtained, the necessary infrastructure for development of the initial components of the Project will be constructed. The " backbone" infrastructure system will extend utilities throughout the project site in a logical and orderly manner. The electric utility alignment proposed in the northern portion of the study area includes the Goodwater Avenue route, alternative segment B. Initial improvements will be solely to construct the backbone roadway system, including the alternative southern access road. The development of lots is not foreseen to occur until after the backbone system is installed.

CONCLUSIONS OF THE EIR
The final EIR evaluates the following environmental issues in relation to the project: Geology and Soils; Vegetation, Wildlife, and Wetlands; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use; Cultural Resources; Aesthetics, Traffic and Circulation; Air Quality; Noise; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Public Utilities and SelVices; and Population and Housing. No other areas of significant impact have been identified since circulation ofthe Draft EIR. The Final EIS/EIR identifies feasible mitigation measures that reduce all potential environmental impacts to a less than significant level except for one. As described in the Final EIS/EIR, impacts to air quality resulting from emissions of nitrogen oxides ( Nox) during short- term construction activities may remain significant even after implementation of feasible mitigation measures. The final EIR also evaluates cumulative and growth-inducing impacts, as well as alternatives to the proposedproject components and the overall project.

FINDINGS
The following findings are made pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15091 and 15093 ( State CEQA Guidelines).

A. Public Resources Code Section 21081 ( a)- Findings-Feasible Mitigation Measures Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 ( a), the City, having reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR for the project, the public record and the administrative record, fmds, pursuant to CEQA and that State CEQA Guidelines, that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate, avoid, or substantially lessen the potentially significant direct environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR with respect to the following:

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Bllsiness Park 2- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

4. 1 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Significant Impact 4. 1. 4- 1
The main impact resulting from gradingoperationsis the potential for erosion during and after the construction.

4. 1. 4- 1
Best management practices (BMP) shall be incorporated and shall be of a design that is consistent with the City of Redding' s Storm Water Quality Improvement Plan, the California Storm Water Quality Associations BMP Handbooks, the California Department of Transportation storm- water quality handbooks, or other such designpracticesthat are deemed suitable for the individual site use at the time of development.

Findings
Implementationof this measure during construction will reduce the potentially significant impact to geology and soils resources to a level considered less than significant.

4. 2 VEGETATION, WILDLIFE, AND WETLANDS
Significant Impact 4. 2- 1
Implementationof the project, including construction, operations, and maintenance activities, could result in the direct loss of, or indirect impactsto, riparian habitat or other sensitive plant communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations.

4. 2- 1A
The City shall appoint a qualified biologist to serve as an environmental inspector. The inspector will be involved throughout all construction phasesof the project. His/her role will be to observe, document, and enforce environmental compliance, as well as actively identify, anticipate, and solve potential environmental compliance concerns.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 3- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

4. 2- 1B
To maintain riparian habitat and bank stability adjacentto abutments, the north and south bridges across Stillwater Creek have been designedto avoid and minimize permanent losses of riparian vegetation to the maximum extent practicable. Further, the environmental inspector will meet on site with the construction contractor prior to the start of construction activities. Together they will designate staging areas and construction access routes so as to avoid encroachment into riparian habitat and riparian buffer where practicable and minimize encroachment where complete avoidance is not practicable. " Avoided" riparian habitat will be dearly identified in the construction drawings and contractor work plans. Exclusionary fencing will be installed to mark boundaries of all avoided riparian areas. All pedestrian and vehicular traffic into the avoided areas delineated by the fencing shall be prohibited during construction. The exclusionary fencing shall be inspectedand maintained on a regularbasis throughout the project construction. Bridge construction will be scheduled for low flow periods (June 1 to October 30) of Stillwater Creek to minimize impacts within the channel.

The project will avoid and minimize losses to riparian habitat within the project construction limits to the maximum extent practicable, using the avoidance measures described above. In addition, where possible, long-term impacts on woody riparian vegetationshould be minimized by trimming trees and shrubs rather than removing entire woody plants or by cutting trees or shrubs at least 1 foot above ground level to leave root systems intact and allow more rapid regenerationfollowing construction. When a direct loss of riparian habitat is unavoidable, the City will plant at a minimum ratio of 3: 1 ( new plantings per woody riparian plant destroyed) for habitat permanently lost due to project construction and at a ratio of2: 1 to compensate for habitat temporarily lost ( e. g., areas where vegetation was cleared for the temporary storage of construction equipment).

These replanting ratios will help eIlSure successful establishment of at least one vigorous plant for each plant removed to accommodate the project. Revegetationto mitigate for permanent direct impacts will occur in areas suited to restoration to help ensure that no net loss of riparian habitat function and value occurs within the project area.

Revegetationto mitigate for temporary direct impacts will occur upon completion of the project within the area( s) disturbed by construction activities. In addition, mitigation for permanent impacts will be provided at a minimum ratio of 1: 1 on an area basis ( area of impact: area of compensation) or as agreedto in consultation with the permitting agency.

Replacementof permanently lost riparian habitat will occur adjacentto Stillwater Creek and Chum Creek, within open areas upstream and downstream of the new bridges, and adjacent to ditches and drainage systems that are determined by a qualified biologist to be suitable. Prior to construction, a qualified biologist will meet onsite with the contractor to count and identify riparian tree and shrub speciesthat would be removed to accommodate construction of project components.

Indirect impacts to riparian habitat shall be mitigated at a ratio of 0.5: 1 ( new plantings per woody riparian plant within the area indirectly impacted) or as agreed to in consultation with the permitting agency. Mitigation shall include planting of native riparian trees and shrubs and will occur within the areas indirectly impacted or in other areas within the project site that are determined by a qualified biologist to be suitable.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Bllsiness Park 4- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Prior to construction, the City of Redding will develop a vegetation restoration plan for permanent and construction- related direct and indirect impacts to riparian habitat. The vegetation restoration plan will identify suitable sites for mitigation of impacts, species to be planted, and numbers and sizes of plantings. Further, it will describe planting techniquesand requiredirrigation, prescribemethods to remove existing noxious weeds, and establish reasonable performance standards and contingency measures. The vegetation restoration plan shall be developed in consultation with the Corps, NOAA- Fisheries, USFWS, and CDFG. Following the completion of construction activities, plantings shall be established using the above guidelines and those set forth in the vegetation restoration plan. All non- native speciesthat are removed will be replaced with native species. Replacementtrees and shrubs shall be planted in the appropriate season ( Le., spring or fall) following the completion of construction. Where constructed drainagedevices and improvements are required, they shall be placed in the least visible locations and naturalized through the use of river rock, earth- tone concrete, and/ or native plant materials.

The City of Redding will monitor the plantings annually for up to 5 years to ensure that trees and shrubs have become established and that performancestandards set forth in the vegetation restoration plan have been met. Annual reports documenting the status of the revegetationefforts will be prepared and submitted to the Corps, NOAA- Fisheries, USFWS, and CDFG. If performance standards have not been met, the contingency measures identified in the vegetation restoration plan (e. g., supplementalplanting) will be implemented as necessary. Once riparian mitigation has been successfullycompleted, the City shall submit a memorandum to the Corps, NOAA- Fisheries, USFWS, and CDFG documenting the results.

Findings
Implementation of these measures during construction will reduce the potentially significant impacts to riparian habitat and other sensitive plant communities to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 2- 3
Implementation of the project, including construction, operations, and maintenance activities, could result in the direct discharge or fill of federally protectedjurisdictional wetlands and other Waters of the U. S.

4. 2- 3A
Prior to construction, the City shall use exclusionary fencing to mark the boundaries of intermittent creeks and riverine waters ( e. g., bed of Stillwater Creek) that are to be avoided.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Business Park 5- April 7. 2006Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) They shall also mark the boundaries of all other waters of the U. S., including wetlands, which are to be avoided. The exclusionary fencing shall be maintained in place throughout construction. All pedestrian and vehicular entry into the avoided waters delineated by the exclusionary fencing shall be prohibited during construction.

4. 2- 3B
The following general wetland BMP' s will be implemented:

Open Trench Construction
Silt fences will be installed on either side of the wetland work path to contain the trench spoil piles and prevent siltation of adjacentwetland area, when applicable. o The topsoil layer of wetland soils will be separatedfrom the underlying subsoil during excavation and will be replaced in the original layering after cable installation.
o The length of open- trench construction adjacent to wetlands will be minimized.

Trench plugs will be installed at either end of the wetland installation to minimize potential; runoff into the wetland.
o Drainagepatterns ( channels) across the wetland will be reestablished as close to the original locations and contours as possible.
o Documentation ( written and photographic) of pre- and post -construction conditions will be maintained by environmental compliance monitors.

Directional Bore
o Fluid flow controls will be available to contain any surface outflow of the fluid. o Spill contaminant materials will be located on- site.

Temporary Access Roads
o Temporary access roads will cross drainagebottoms at nearlyright anglesand level with the streambed gradient whenever possible.
o No perennial watercourses will be blocked or diverted.

Forded Crossings
o Forded crossings will be constructed without excavating stream bank or bed, if possible. If grading is necessary, crossing will be accomplishedby excavating a ramp through the bank( s) to allow equipment access. If placement of gravel is necessary, clean gravel suitable for salmon spawning shall be used. o Topsoil will be salvagedand protected from the area to be graded. o Rampswill be gradedso that soil is pushedaway from the drainage, and the banks will be contoured to blend the ramps as naturally as possible to the adjacent, undisturbed reaches of the streambank.
o Salvagedtopsoil and gradedsoil will be placed a minimum of 10 feet from stream banks and protected to minimize sediment transport to the aquatic environment. o If the stream is flowing, an oil- absorbent boom will be placed across the channel downstream of the crossing.
o If necessary methods ( e. g., clean rock fill, swamp mats) wiil be employed to facilitate movement of equipment across the bed of the channel. o Upon completion of construction in that zone, during site restoration, any mats will be removed, rock fill will either be removed or spreadover the site, and topography and vegetation will be reestablished.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 6- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) o Forded crossings will not be used for flowing streams where multiple daily crossingswill occur.

Culverts
o Cover and fill material will consist of clean rock or gravel fill or other appropriate medium.
o Culverts will be placedslightly below normal stream gradeto avoid culvert outfall barriers .
o Where needed, the inlet and outlet will be armored.
o Temporary diversion structures will be used during culvert installation as necessary .
o The subcontractor will maintain the culverts or conduits such that drainage is not inhibited and damageis not created on adjacentproperties. o If the stream is flowing, an oil- absorbent boom will be placed across the channel downstream of the crossing.
o Upon completion of constructiolJ. in that zone, during site restoration, all culvert materials will be removed and topography and vegetatiori reestablished.

In addition, in order to maintain habitat and bank stability adjacent to bridge abutments, bridges will be designedto avoid and minimize to the extent practicable impacts to creek and stream corridors. The following mitigation shall be implemented where construction activities occur within 100 feet of the top of bank of any intermittent creek or riverine/ perennial stream habitat:

All trenching and construction activities across intermittent creek or perennial stream features, including Stillwater Creek, Chum Creek, and Clover Creek, will be limited to low- flow periods (June 1 to October 30 unless otherwise approved) to minimize impacts within the channel.

Sediment curtains ( upstream and downstream of the construction zone, placed so as to allow for fish passage at all times) or other suitable means will be used to prevent sediment disturbed during construction activities ( Le., trenching) from being transported and deposited outside of the construction zone.

To the extent practicable, areas disturbed during construction that are not occupied by permanent infrastructure shall be returned to pre- construction contours.

Areas left bare following construction shall be revegetated.

Further, the construction impact area for the alternative southern access road ( Alternatives 1 and 2) shall be limited so as to avoid direct impacts to the four vernal pools along its route Le., impacts due to construction shall be limited to the width of the road, 84 feet, in those areas adjacent to vernal pools rather than the typical 175- foot- wide construction zone).

4. 2- 3C
The intent of Mitigation Measure 4. 2- 3B is to ensure there is no net- loss of aquatic function and value resulting from direct dischargeof fill into waters of the U. S. during implementation of the proposed project. In order to determine the total amount of direct discharges to be compensated for, boundaries of waters of the U. S. shall be delineated in any areas of the project site not previously delineated. The delineation will be conducted using the method CEQA Findings, Stillwater Bllsiness Park 7- April 7. 2006Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) prescribedin the Corpsdelineation manual ( Environmental Laboratory 1987). The delineation of the project site will be submitted to the Corps for verification where existing verifications do not occur. The verified delineation shall be the basis for determining the extent of direct discharge into waters of the U. S.

Compensatorymitigation for unavoidable impacts shall be achieved through on- site and off- site preservation, creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland features in the OpenSpace Area and other suitable locations. The City shall develop and implement an Open Space Management Plan ( OMP) that includes a wetland preservation, creation, restoration, and enhancement plan prepared according to the guidance presented in the Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco and Sacramento Districts Special Public Notice " Mitigation and Monitoring ProposalGuidelines" dated December 30, 2004. The OMP shall be reviewed and approved by the appropriativeregulatory agenciesthrough the state and federal permitting programs. Implementation of the OMP will ensure no net loss of function and value of preservedwaters of the U. S. due to project development. The OMP will identify measures that emphasize on- site, in- kind preservation, creation, restoration, and enhancement of aquatic functions and values to the maximum extent practicable. The OMP shall identify specific sites within the Open Spaceor elsewhere within the project site where mitigation measures can be implemented in perpetuity. The OMP shall identify the management practices, monitoring parameters, and performance criteria to mitigate for the direct discharges.

The OMP shall identify the creation and restoration practices, monitoring parameters, and performance criteria to mitigate for the direct discharges. Typical mitigation measures, monitoring parameters, and performance criteria for wetlands shall include:

The target number ofhydrophytic plant speciesto be established in the mitigation area shall be the average number of obligate, facultative wetland, and facultative speciesthat occur in adjacentreference vernal pool/ swale habitat. Reference wetland habitat will be identified in consultation with the Corps and CDFG.

The percent cover of obligate, facultative wetland, and facultative specieswithin the mitigation area shall not be less than 80 percent of the average percent cover occurring in the reference vernal pool/ swale habitats.

No visible erosion of topsoil shall occur within the mitigation area.

Water depths, periods of inundation, and soil saturation in the mitigation area shall be similar to conditions occurring in the reference wetlands.

If the performance criteria are not satisfied by the end of the fourth spring following construction of the mitigation area, remediation measures identified in the OMP shall be implemented. At a minimum, the monitoring program would consist of the filing of an annual report to the Corps and CDFG for 5 years. The mitigation shall be considered successful if criteria are met for 3 consecutive years. The City or their appointed agent shall maintain the mitigation site in perpetuity.

The City will acquire required compensatory mitigation via on- site and off- site preservation, restoration, and enhancement of lands suited to these purposes.

CEQA Filldill~. Stillwater Business Park 8- April 7. 2006Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Except for features occupied or presumed occupied by federally listed vernal pool species, mitigation will be provided at ratios not less than 2: 1 (mitigation to impact, acreage basis). For features occupied or presumedoccupied by federally listed vernal pools species, mitigation ratios presentedfor the occupying specieswill supersedethose outlined here.

Findings
Implementationof these measures during construction will reduce the potentially significant impacts .from direct project effects on federally protectedjurisdictional wetlands and other Waters of the U. S. to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impacts 4. 2- 4
Implementation of the project, including construction, operations, and maintenance activities, could result in indirect impacts to federally protectedjurisdictional wetlands and other Waters of the U. S.

Project indirect effects could result from modification of local hydrology, degradation of water quality through operation and construction activities, adverse modification of habitats caused by human encroachment, and introduction and dispersal of invasive species. Indirect effects are assumed when project activities are within 50 feet of Waters of the U. S.

4. 2- 4A .

Prior to construction, the City shall install flagging to delineate the outer edgeof the buffer zone for waters of the U. S. ( 50 feet). The flagging shall be maintained in place throughout construction. Entry into the buffer zone bounded by the flagging shall be strictly prohibited for those features within the Open Space Preserve and avoided to the maximum extent practicable for the remaining features.

4. 2- 4B
Encroachment into the watershed ( Cow Creek) of the adjacent Stillwater Plains Wetland Mitigation Bank for temporary construction activities or placementof permanent infrastructure shall be prohibited. Prior to construction the City shall obtain topographic mapping that is sufficiently detailed so as to enable precise determination of the boundary between the Stillwater Creek watershed ( west portion of site) and the Cow Creek watershed ( east portion of site). Prior to construction the City shall revise the site layout for Alternatives 1 and 2 to avoid such encroachment into the Cow Creek watershed and resultant indirect effects on vernal pools in the Stillwater Plains Mitigation Bank.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Bllsiness Park 9- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Findings
Implementationof these measures during construction will reduce the potentially significant impacts from indirect effects to federally protectedjurisdictional wetlands and other Waters of the U. S. to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 2- 5
Implementation of the project, including construction, operations, and maintenance activities, could result in direct and indirect impacts to federally or state listed, proposed listed or candidate plant species or their known or potentially occupied designated critical habitat. Speciesinclude the slender Orcutt grass, Greene' s tuctoria, and Bogg' s Lake hedgehyssop. Portions of the study area has designated critical habitat for slender Orcutt grass. Indirect effects cold include run- off of materials sucl1 as sediment, pollutants, and toxic materials from project construction areas or building parcels after construction.

Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and are required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings. The terms and conditions, along with other measures developedthrough State and federal EndangeredSpeciesAct consultation with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife SeIVice and the California Department of Fish and Game will be adhered to. All permitting conditions required by other regulatory agencies will also be implemented as necessary.

4. 2- 5
Protocol- level floral sUIVeys have been completed over the majority of the Alternatives 1 and 2 study area and portions of the Alternative 3 study area, and the project has been designed to avoid known populations of federal and/ or state listed plant speciesto the extent feasible. Prior to final project design, protocol- level floral sUIVeys shall be conducted in the unsuIVeyedportions of the study areas containing habitat suitable for slender Orcutt grass, Greene' s tuctoria, and Bogg' s Lake hedge hyssop (e. g., vernal pools). SUIVeysshall be conducted during the blooming periods for these speciesto determine ( 1) if the species occur and ( 2) the quality, location, and extent of any populations. If any of these speciesare found, and occur within 250 feet of proposed construction, the project will be redesignedto avoid the population( s) to the maximum extent practicable. For those populations to be fully avoided, the following measures shall be implemented:
o During the planning stages of the project, the known populations of slender Orcutt grass, Greene' s tuctoria, and Bogg' s Lake hedgehyssopin the project area will be included in the engineering drawings and all construction activities will be conducted so as to avoid the populations. Completeavoidance of direct and indirect impacts would be attained by maintaining a 250- foot buffer around the known populations. However, a smaller buffer may be used if detailed topographic information shows that the local hydrology drains away from the wetlands and plants in question.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater BlIsiness Park 10- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) o Prior to the start of construction activities within the project area, exclusionary fencing shall be erected around the buffer zones of the populations that will be completely avoided. If necessary, a qualified botanist shall be present to assist with locating populations of slender Orcutt grass, Greene' s tuctoria, and Bogg' s Lake hedgehyssop. The exclusionaryfencing shall be periodically inspectedthroughout each period of construction and be repaired as necessary. All pedestrian and vehicular entry into the completely avoided areas delineated by the fencing shall be prohibited during construction.
o To protect completely avoided populations from impacts associated with project operationsand secondaryimpactsdue to human access, those populations and their buffer zones within the core facilities area will be included within an Open Space easement to be maintained in petpetuity. Additional measures to protect these avoided populations from impacts associated with project operations will be included in the OMP for the Stillwater Business Park Project. Such measures will include, but are not limited to, fencing of known populations and/ or erecting signs that direct the public to keep out of sensitive features.

If complete avoidance of a population of these federally or state listed plant speciesis not feasible, then a species-specific determination will be made by CDFG for state only listed species and by CDFG and USFWS for jointly listed species as to the appropriate mitigation measures to be employed. These measures will likely include habitat preservation at a ratio of at least 2: 1 ( mitigation area to impacted area). Note that preservationrequirementsare not additive for each speciespresent ( Le., an area occupied by one listed- plant species requires the same about of habitat preservation as an equivalent area occupiedby two or more listed plant species). Prior to impacting a state listed species, the City will need to obtain an incidental take permit pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2081( b). For jointly listed plant species CDFG may issue a corisistencydetermination pursuant to Fish and Game Code S ection 2080 . 1 provided that the terms of the federal biological opinion and/ or incidental take statement will minimize and fully mitigate the impacts of the taking. Restoration and protection of habitat shall be the focus of mitigation efforts for impacts to listed plant species; however, mitigation measures may also include salvaging the seeds of the plants with subsequentreplanting in nearby suitable habitat. A detailed restoration and monitoring plan will be developed by a qualified botanist and will contain, at a minimum, the following information:
o location of areas on- or off- site to restore plant populations. o a description of the propagation and planting techniques to be employed in the restoration effort.
o a timetable for implementation of the restoration plan. o a monitoring plan and performance criteria.
o a description of remedial measures to be performed in the event that initial restoration measures are unsuccessful in meeting the performance criteria. o a description of site maintenance activities to occur after restoration activities e. g., weed control, irrigation, and control of herbivory by livestock and wildlife).

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Business Park ll- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Findings
Implementation of this measure during construction will reduce the potentially significant impacts due to direct and indirect effects on federally or state listed, proposed listed or candidate plant speciesor their known or potentiallyoccupied designatedcritical habitat to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 2- 6
Implementationof the project, including construction, operations, and maintenance activities, could result in direct and indirect impacts to federally or state listed, proposed listed or candidate fish speciesand their designatedcritical habitat. Anadromous fish species and/ or their habitat occur within Stillwater Creek. Indirect effects cold include run- off of materials such as sediment, pollutants, and toxic materials from project construction areas or building parcelsafter construction.

Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measures below. The mitigation measures have been found to be feasible and are required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings. The terms and conditions, along with other measures developed through federal EndangeredSpeciesAct consultation with the National Marine Fisheries SelVice will be adhered to. All pennitting conditions required by other regulatory agencieswill also be implemented as necessary.

4. 2- 6A
The work period for in- channel construction will be approvedby the Corps in their 404 pennit and by CDFG in their Section " 1602 stream alteration agreement. To the maximum extent practicable, in- channel construction will be restricted to the dry season when stream flows have subsided and steelhead and salmon are not present. This will avoid any potential for direct impacts to special-status fishes. If work cannot be. restricted to the dry season, the potential for direct impacts to migrating or rearing steelhead and salmon will be minimized by the employment of slow, deliberate movement of equipment in the channel and/ or having a person walk ahead of the equipment to scare fish away from the work area. In addition, the pressure exerted on piles each time pile driving is initiated will be increased slowly to the desired operating level over a period of several minutes, providing time for any fish sensitive to the percussion wave to move out of the area.

If work cannot be restricted to the dry season, work in the creek channel will be staged so as to not restrict the stream flow and create an impediment to fish migration.

Providing at least one- half of the active channel width for bypass of stream flows at the in- channel work site will provide sufficient fish passage. In addition, the period oftime that stream. flows are constricted by coffer dams and work activities at the trenching transect across the Stillwater Creek channel will be minimized.

Erosion control work shall consist of application of erosion control materials within non- riparian upland areas and approach fills, embankment slopes, excavation slopes, and other areas designatedby the City. These materials shall consist of fiber, native grass and forb seed ( e. g., hydro seeding) , commercial fertilizer, and water.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Business Park 12- April 7. 2006 Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Activities that increase the erosion potential within the project footprint shall be restricted to the fullest extent possible to the relatively dry summer and early fall period to minimize the potential for rainfall events to mobilize and transport sediment to Stillwater Creek. If these activities must take place during the late fall, winter, or spring then temporary erosion and sediment control structures will be in place and operational at the end of each construction day and maintained until disturbed ground surfaces have been successfully revegetated.

Areas where wetland and upland vegetation need to be removed shall be identified in advance of ground disturbance and limited to only those areas that have been approved by the City.

Hydroseeding, or other Type-D erosion control, shall be applied to areas where vegetation has been removed to reduce short- term erosion prior to the start of the rainy season. Soils shall not be left exposedduring the rainy. season.

Filter fences and catch basins shall be placed below all construction activities near the bank of Stillwater Creek and Clover Creek, but not in contact with flowing water, to intercept sediment before it reaches the waterway. These structures shall be installed prior to any clearing or grading activities.

Spoils sites shall be located such that they do not drain directly into surface water features, if possible. If a spoils site drains into a surface water feature, catch basins shall be constructed to intercept sediment before it reaches the feature. Catch basins will be sized appropriately. Spoils sites shall be gradedand vegetatedto reduce the potential for erosion.

Sediment control measures shall be in placeprior to the onset of the rainy season and will be monitored and maintained in good working condition until the disturbed areas have been revegetated.

Appropriate monitoring measures shall be implemented by the City to document compliance with the measures described above. Monitoring measures shall include turbidity measurements below the work sites, inspection of catch basins and filter fences, and monitoring of revegetationprogress. The CVRWQCB will set allowable turbidity standards. In the event that monitoring detects that turbidity standards are exceeded ( see Section 4.3, Water Quality), work shall cease until levels are acceptable.

4. 2- 6B
To avoid " fracing" during directional boring and the subsequentdischargeof drilling mud, the contractor( s) will constantly monitor the drill for any significantloss of pressure. In the event of a significant pressure loss, the contractor( s) will immediately cease drilling, inspect the waterway for evidence of fracing, and notify the environmental monitor. In addition, because surface frac- outs may take placebefore a significant drop in pressure occurs, the contractor will monitor the area being drilled under for the appearance of drilling mud, an indication of a surface frac- out.

In the event of a frac- out, vacuum trucks with appropriatelength hoses shall be placed at the edge of the waterway to contain the frac- out. Sandbagsand silt fencing shall be staged downstream of construction, within the waterway channel, to contain any bore mud that surfaces. Shovels and buckets will be available on- site to clean up any bore mud that the CEQA Findings, Stillwater BlIsiness Park 13- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) vacuum trucks cannot remove. Further, only bentonite formulations with nontoxic additives shall be used.

Findings
Iniplementationof these measures during construction will reduce the potentiallysignificant impacts due to direct and indirect effects on federally or state listed, proposed listed or candidate fish species and their designated critical habitat to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 2- 7
Implementation of the project, including construction, operations, and maintenance activities, could result in direct and indirect impacts to federally or state listed, proposedlisted or candidate wildlife speciesand their designatedcritical habitat. The valley elderberrylonghorn beetle, vernal pool fairy shrimp, and vernal pool tadpole shrimp occur within the project area. Indirect effects cold include ron- off of materials such as sediment, pollutants, and toxic mat~ rials from project construction areas or building parcels after construction.

Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementationof the mitigation measures below. The mitigation measures have been found to be feasible and are required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings. The terms and conditions, along with other measures developedthrough State and federal EndangeredSpeciesAct consultation with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game will be adhered to. All permitting conditions required by other regulatory agencies will also be implemented. as necessary.

4. 2- 7 A
Bank Swallow
Grading and other construction activities should be scheduled to avoid the nesting season May through July) to the extent possible.

Although bank swallows are not known to occur on the site, a pre- construction survey for the speciesis necessary to ensure that its status ( presence/absence) on the project site has not changed between the completion of the biological surveys and the onset of project construction. Therefore, the City shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre- construction survey for bank swallows within 500 feet of proposed construction zones situated within or adjacent to suitable bank swallow habitat. The survey may be conducted no more than one week prior to the onset of any construction activity. If no active nests are located, no further mitigation is necessary.

If an active nest( s) is located within 500 feet of construction activities, it shall be mapped, and a qualified biologist, in consultation with CDFG, will determine the extent of a construction- free buffer zone to be established around the nest. Active nests may not be removed until after the young have fledged (based on field verification). A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest to determine when the young have fledged and submit status reports to CDFG throughout the nesting season.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Business Park 4- April 7. 2006 Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

4. 2- 7B
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp and Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp Protocol- level sUlveys for vernal pool branchiopods have been completed over the majority of the Alternatives 1 and 2 study area and portions of the Alternative 3 study area and vernal pool tadpole shrimp are known to occur in both study areas. For those portions of the project area where protocol- level surveys have not been completed, the City shall either ( 1) prior to construction, retain a qualified biologist to conduct protocol- level surveys for listed vernal pool branchiopodsfollowing the USFWS Interim Survey Guidelines to Permittees for Recovery Permits under Section lO( a)( 1)( A) of the Endangered Species Act for Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods (1996a) to determine presence/ absence; or ( 2) assume presence.

Measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate direct and indirect impacts to vernal pool fairy shrimp and vernal pool tadpole shrimp within 250 feet of the project disturbance shall be incorporated into the project, unless the USFWS permits a reduced setback.

Consultation with the USFWS is needed to determine the extent of mitigation that will be requiredto address impacts. This mitigation will be accomplishedin conjunction with the Corps Section 404 permit process. Mitigation measures shall include the following pending consultation with the USFWS and Corps).
o For every acre of known or presumed occupied habitat directly and indirectly affected, at least two vernal pool preservationcredits will be dedicated within a Service- approved ecosystem preservation bank, or, based on USFWS evaluation of site- specific conservation values, 3 acres of vernal pool habitat may be preserved on the project site or on another non- bank site located outside the project area, as approved by the USFWS.
o For every acre of known or presumedoccupied habitat directly impacted, at least one vernal pool creation credit will be dedicated within a Service- approvedhabitat mitigation bank, or, based on USFWS . evaluation of site- specific conservation values, 2 acres of vernal pool habitat will be created or substantially restored or enhanced and monitored on the project site or on another non- bank site located outside the project area, as approvedby the USFWS.
o Vernal pool habitat and associated upland habitat used as on- site mitigation will be protected from adverse impacts and managedin perpetuity.

In addition, the City shall implement Measure 4. 2- 4 with a 250 foot buffer zone for Waters of the U. S. which contain listed vernal pool branchiopod species to avoid potential indirect impacts to these listed speciesas a result of impaired water quality or altered hydrology and Measure 4. 2- 3 to avoid potential impacts to vernal pool branchiopods due to trenching activities.

4. 2- 7C
Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle ( VELB)
VELB are found exclusively on elderberry shrubs. Thus, protection of this speciesis based on protection of this shrub. The USFWS has adopted a standard mitigation protocol ( USFWS 1999) for avoidance of impacts to VELB. Elderberry plants with one or more stems measuring

1.0 inch or greater in diameter at ground level and occurring where they may be directly or indirectly effected by the proposed action require mitigation. The standard mitigation CEQA Findings. Stillwater Business Park 5- April 7. 2006Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) measures will be implemented and are summarized below. However, fonnal consultation with the USFWS will be requiredprior to any distUlbance at the site in order to obtain the necessary take permit.

All elderberry shrubs with one or more stems measuring 1.0 inch or greater in diameter at ground level that occur on or adjacentto the proposedproject site will be thoroughly searched for beetle exit holes. In addition, all elderberry stems 1.0 inch or greater in diameter at ground level will be tallied by diameter size class ( protocol- level surveys were completed in 2003 over all of the Alternatives 1 and 2 core facilities and Open Space; however, these surveys are valid for only 2 years).

Complete avoidance ( Le., no adverse effects) may be assumed when a lOO- foot ( or wider) buffer is established and maintained around elderberry plants containing stems measuring 1.0 inch or greater in diameter at ground level. Measures to protect buffer areas will be instituted prior to construction and will include fencing, signs, and worker education programs
Any damagedone to buffer areas during construction will be restored. In addition, the areas will continue to be protectedfrom damageafter construction is complete. The City shall retain a qualified biologist to prepare a written description of how the buffer areas are to be restored, protected, and maintained after construction is completed. Typical measures include fencing, signs, weeding, and trash removal.

Elderberry plants that cannot be avoided will be transplanted to a USFWS approved conservation area prior to construction under the supervision of a qualified biologist.

Each elderberry stem measuring 1.0 inch or greater in diameter at ground level that is adversely affected ( Le., transplanted or destroyed) will also be replaced, in the conservation area, with elderberry seedlingsor cuttings at a ratio ranging from 1 : 1 to 8: 1 new plantings to affected stems) dependent upon their location and size. The conservation area will be protected in perpetuity as habitat for the valley elderberry longhorn beetle, and the City will provide a written monitoring plan to the USFWS.

Findings
Implementation of these measures during construction will reduce the potentially significant impacts due to direct and indirect impacts to federally or state listed, proposed listed or candidate wildlife speciesand their designatedcritical habitat to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 2- 9
Implementation of the project, including construction, operations, and maintenance activities, could result in direct and indirect impacts to some non- listed special status or protected species. Species include the western spadefoottoad, northwestern pond turtle, and the western burrowing owl.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Bllsiness Park 6- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

4. 2- 9A
Western Spadefoot Toad
Prior to construction, the City will retain a qualified biologist to present a Worker Environmental Awareness Program. The program shall provide construction workers, contractors, and subcontractors with information on their responsibilitieswith regardto sensitive biological resources.

Although western spadefoottoads are not known to occur on the site, suitable habitat is present and toads could move onto the site at any time. Thus, a pre- construction survey for the specie"s is necessary to confirm its status ( presence/absence) on the project site immediately prior to the onset of project construction. Therefore, the City shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre- construction survey for the western spadefoottoad including the area within 50 feet of suitable habitat ( vernal pools, seasonal wetlands) a maximum of one week prior to construction. If a western spadefoottoad is found, the biologist shall move it to suitable habitat in a safe location outside of the construction zone. In the event that a western spadefoottoad is observed within an active construction zone, the contractor shall temporarily halt construction activities until a biologist has moved the toad to a safe location outside of the construction zone, within similar habitat.

In addition, the City shall implement Mitigation Measure 4. 2- 3 for addressingwater quality impacts to mitigate for potential indirect impactsto western spadefoottoads due to wastewater treatment and discharge, storm- water management, sedimentation, and accidental spills.

4. 2- 9B
Northwestern Pond Turtle
Because turtles may move into and out of the project site at any time, a pre- construction survey for the speciesis necessary to confirm its status ( presence/absence) on the site immediately prior to the onset of project construction. Therefore, The City shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a minimum of one survey of the project site for pond turtles and their nests. The survey shall occur in areas within 660 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Stillwater and Chum Creek as well as suitable ponds on or adjacent to the site. The survey shall be conducted a maximum of one week prior to construction.

If a pond turtle is found within a construction impact zone, the biologist shall move it to a safe location within similar habitat. If a pond turtle nest is found, the biologist shall flag the site and determine if construction activities can avoid impacting the nest. If the nest cannot be avoided, it will be excavated and re- buried at a suitable location outside of the construction impact zone by a qualified biologist.

In the event that a pond turtle is observed within an active construction zone, the contractor shall temporarily halt in- stream construction activities until the individual has been moved to a safe location outside of the construction zone, within similar habitat.

In addition, the City shall implement the mitigation measures described in the Hydrology and Water Quality Section to avoid potential impacts to water quality due to trenching activities.

Further, the City shall implement Mitigation Measure 4. 2- 3 for addressing water quality impacts to mitigate for potential indirect impacts to northwestern pond turtles due to CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 17- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) wastewater treatment and discharge, storm- water management, sedimentation, and accidental spills.

4. 2- 9C
Burrowing Owls
Although burrowing owls were not observed within any of the three alternative sites during reconnaissance surveys, suitable habitat is present. Therefore, protocol- level surveys for burrowing owls shall be conducted by a qualifiedbiologist prior to any SOlI-altering activity occurring within the project area and a surrounding area of potential effect ( the area within approximately 250 feet of project boundaries). The surveys shall be conducted per CDFG guidelines. Pursuant to CDFG guidelines, if no owls are found then no further mitigation will be warranted since there is no evidence of their presence within the past 3 years. If burrowing owls are found, consultation with, and authorization by, CDFG shall be required.

4. 2- 9D
Nesting Special-Status Birds ( YeHow- breasted chat, YeHow Warbler, Loggerhead Shrike, and Tricolored Blackbird)
Grading and other construction activities shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season March through September) to the extent possible.

If vegetation is to be removed by the project and all necessary approvals have been obtained, potential nesting substrate ( e. g. bushes, trees, grass, buildings) that will be removed by the project may be removed between October 1 and February 28 ( i. e., outside of the nesting season) to help preclude nesting.

The City shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre- construction survey within a 250- foot buffer around the proposedconstruction zones. The survey may be conducted no more than one week prior to the onset of any construction activity. If no active nests are located, no further mitigation is necessary.

If active nests ( nests containing eggs or young) are located within 250 feet of construction activities, their location shall be mapped and a qualified biologist, in consultation with CDFG, will determine the extent of a construction- free buffer zone to be established around the nest. Active nests may not be removed until after the young have fledged (based on field verification). A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest to determine when the young have fledged and submit status reports to the CDFG throughout the nesting season.

4. 2- 9E
Nesting Raptors
Grading and other construction activities shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season February 15 through September 30) to the extent possible.

If vegetation is to be removed by the project and all necessary approvals have been obtained, potential nesting substrate ( e. g. trees, shrubs) that will be removed by the project may be removed between October 1 and February 14 ( i. e., outside the nesting season for raptor species) to ensure that active raptor nest trees are not removed as a result of project construction activities.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 8- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) The City shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a minimum of one survey for nesting raptors within a 250- foot buffer around proposed construction activities. The survey may be conducted no more than one week prior to the onset of any construction activity. Active raptor nests located within 250 feet of construction activities shall be mapped.

If an active nest ( a nest containing eggs or young) is found a qualified biologist, in consultation with CDFG, will determine the extent of a construction- free buffer zone to be established around the nest. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest( s) to determine when the young have fledged and submit status reports to the CDFG, as appropriate, throughout the nesting season. An active nest may only be removed after the young have fledged (based on field verification) .

4. 2- 9F
Roosting Bats
Although no special-status bats were observed during reconnaissance surveys, suitable habitat is present and bats could move into or off of the site at any time. Thus, a pre- construction survey for roosting bats shall be conducted prior to any removal of buildings, particularly those with closed areas such as an attic space; trees 312 inches in diameter at 4. 5 feet above grade; or bridges with expansionjoints. The survey will be conducted by a qualified bat biologist (Le., a biologist holding a CDFG collection permit and a Memorandum of Understanding with CDFG allowing the biologist to handle and collect bats). No activities that would result in disturbance to active roosts of non- listed special-status bats shall proceedprior to the completed surveys. If no active roosts are found, then no further action would be warranted. Because bats are known to abandon young when disturbed, if a maternity roost is located, a qualified bat biologist will determine the extent of a construction- free zone to be implemented around the roost. If either a maternity roost or hibemacula is present, Mitigation Measure 4. 2- 9D or 4. 2- 9E shall be implemented. CDFG shall also be notified of any active nurseries within the construction zone.

If active maternity roosts or hibemacula are found, the project will be redesignedto avoid the loss of the building or tree occupied by the roost if feasible.

If an active nursery roost is located and the project cannot be redesignedto avoid removal of the occupied tree or structure, demolition of that tree or structure should commence before maternity colonies form ( i. e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant ( flying) Le., after July 31). The disturbance- free buffer zones described in Mitigation 1 should be observed during the maternity roost season ( March 1 - July 31) If a non- breeding bat hibemacula is found in a structure or tree scheduled to be razed, the individuals shall be safely evicted, under the direction of a qualified bat biologist ( as determined by a Memorandum of Understanding with CDFG), by opening the roosting area. to allow air flow through the cavity. Demolition shall then follow no less than the following day (Le., there will be no less than one night between initial disturbance for air flow and the demolition). This action should allow bats to leave during dark hours, thus increasing their chance of finding new roosts with a minimum of potential predation during daylight. Trees CEQA Findings, Stillwater Bllsiness Park 19- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) with roosts that need to be removed shall first be disturbed at dusk, just prior to removal that same evening, to allow bats to escape during the darker hours.

4. 2- 9G
Low- sodium lighting will be used where feasible for illumination of parking lots, buildings, etc. Streetlights will be shielded and directed downward to the street, away from the riparian corridor and Open Space, to the extent possible.

Findings
Implementationof these measures during construction, operations, and maintenance activities will reduce the potentially significant impacts due to direct and indirect effects on some non- listed special status or protected speciesto a level considered less than significant.

4. 3 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Significant Impact 4. 3. 4- 1
The water quality of Stillwater Creek would be impacted by sediment resulting from grading operations during construction.

Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings. Other mitigation meaSures developed for similar impacts, e. g. mitigation measure 4.1.4- 1 will also lessen the effects of this impact. .

4. 3. 4- 1
In addition to the erosion control measures identified in Mitigation Measures 4.1- 1 and 4.1- 2 in Section 4. 1 - Geology and Soils, two new sediment ponds will need to be constructed as identified in Figure 4.3- 5.

Findings
Implementation of this measure during construction, operations, and maintenance activities will reduce the potentially significant impactsto Stillwater Creek from sediment due to grading operations to a level considered less than significant.

4. 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Significant Impact 4. 5. 4- 1
Site SIP # 1 has been avoided through Projectredesign, however, should the Projectproponent desire to utilize this area, a mitigation measure is advanced. The likelihood of the site being developed is very low given that the site will be placed under a conservation easement which protects it in perpetuity .

CEQAFindings. Stillwater Bflsiness Park 20- April 7. 2006Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementationof the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure is feasible and required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings.

4. 5. 4- 1
Fonnal archaeologicalevaluation ( Le., archaeologicaltesting to fonnally detennine eligibility and significance) would need to be undertaken and detailed recommendations for treatment would be required to be advanced if the site were to be found eligible. Treatment could range from avoidance to data recovery excavations, depending on the findings of testing and the nature of Project impacts.

Findings
Implementation of this measure throughout all project phases will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 5. 4- 2
The present evaluation and recommendations are based on the findings of an inventory level survey only. There is always the possibility that potentially significant unidentified cultural materials could be encountered on or below the surface during the course of future development or construction activities.

4. 5. 4- 2
Previously unidentified cultural resources could be inadvertently encountered during the course of construction activity. In the event of such a contingency, construction work will stop immediately and additional consultation with a professional archaeologist will be necessary to develop site- specific mitigation measures.

Findings
Implementation of this measure during construction will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

4. 6 AESTHETICS
Significant Impact 4. 6. 3- 1
The proposedproject would urbanize a largeportion of undevelopedlands that ha e been historically used for limited oat production and cattle grazing. Development of the site would be an extension CEQA Findings, Stillwater Bllsiness Park 21- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) of the existing urban edge of the City. The scenic value of the site, albeit of little benefit to the public, will be lost. The visual character of the site will changetherebyresulting in visual impacts to the area.

Mitigation. Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings.

4. 6. 3- 1
The site shall be zoned with the Planned Development Overlay (PD). As part of the PD Plan, when siting buildings, care should be taken to minimize obstructing views of the hills and mountains. Landscapingshould be utilized in strategicareas to minimize the visual impact of the electrical transmission line poles. Visual corridors should be developed which allow uninterrupted open space views of distant hills and mountains between buildings, unless existing natural landscaping and/ or topography currently are obstructing such views.

Findings
Implementation of this measure during construction will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 6. 3- 2
Two electrical substations will be construction to provide electrical power to the Project.

Distribution circuits from the substations will be placedundergroundexcept for two circuits which will exist as underbuilds on all transmission structures, however, transmission lines would impact the visual quality along Rancho Road. In addition, 100 foot microwave towers may be built at the substations.

4. 6. 3- 2
As part of the PD Plan, landscapingwill be planted as needed to screen the substations. The type and amount will be specifically determined when plansare reviewed by the City, however, to the maximum extent feasible, any views of the facilities from the Stillwater Park shall be minimized.

Findings
Implementation of this measure during construction will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater BlIsiness Park 22- April 7. 2006 Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Significant Impact 4. 6. 3- 3
Given the nature of the area, the project may introduce a significant new nighttime light source into the area. There may be some light spill over onto adjacent properties, especially to residential propertiesadjacentto the northeastern boundaryof the site. Lighting is proposedalong the backbone road through the site. Light could affect areas along Stillwater Creek, impacting habitat areas.

Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would Qereduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure is feasible and required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings.

4. 6. 3- 3
To the extent practicable, low- Pressure sodium lighting shall be used for outdoor uses. No light source shall be directed skyward. Light standards shall be no taller than 25 feet in height.

Outdoor lighting will be placed, designed, and directed to avoid light spillover into the riparian habitat areas adjacent to Stillwater Creek. These standards shall be incorporated into the PD Plan.

Findings
Implementation of this measure during construction will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 6. 3- 4
The project could result in daytime glare resulting from the buildings, their architecture, and the types of materials used.

4. 6. 3- 4
The use of muted or compatible architectural materials and colors will reduce the impact of daytime glare.

Findings
Implementation of this measure during construction will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 6. 3- 5
Proposed roadway improvements will create an impact by introducing new streets and widening existing roadways in the Project vicinity.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 23- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings.

4. 6. 3- 5
Landscaping which includes trees shall be required for new road construction and existing road- widening improvements.

Findings
Implementation of this measure during construction will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

4. 7 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
Significant Impact 4. 7. 4- 12
The southern extension of Road " A" from the project site to Ailport Road is proposed for construction during Phase 1 of the project. In order for it to function properly, the road must be constructed to standards, which are identified as mitigation measures.

4. 7. 4- 12
The Road " A" southerly extension shall have a two- lane arterial cross- section and be classified as a designatedtruck route. The newly fonned Ailport RoadlRoad " A" intersection should be installed with a traffic signal. The currently existing Fig Tree Lane approach to Ailport Road/ Aero Street will be realigned to intersect with the southerly extension of Road " A" a minimum of 400 feet from the space bar at the intersection. These improvements are the sole responsibility of the Project.

Findings
Implementationof this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 7. 4- 13
With development of Phase 1, the Ailport Road corridor is projected to be the most impacted.

Several intersections will meet peak hour signal warrants and several roadway segments will exceed the acceptableLOS " c"
CEQA Findings, Stillwater Bllsiness Park 24- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementationof the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these fmdings.

4. 7. 4- 13
Under Existing plus Phase- l conditions, the existing two- and- three- Iane arterial section shall be widened to four- lane arterial standards from the SR44 interchangethrough the intersection with Knighten Road, as part of the ultimate plans for this segment to be a four- lane expressway. Also, the existing two- lane arterial section shall be widened to four- lane arterial standards from Knighton Road to the intersection with Chum Creek Road/Dersch Road, as part of the ultimate plans for this segment to be a four- lane expressway. In order to accommodate the ultimate plans, these four- lane arterial sections are to be constructed as an expressway- arterial " hybrid" including a center median
The Airport Road intersections with SR44 eastbound and westbound ramps, Hartnell Avenue, and Rancho Road shall be installed with traffic signalsunder existing plus Phase- l conditions.

Rate of development of Phase 1 shall determine time of installation. Intersection illS and traffic warrants will be analyzedon a biennial schedule by a traffic engineerand the necessary improvementscompletedwithin one year of the first report that identifies illS levels are below C and/ or traffic signal warrants are met for the p. m. peak hour.

The recommended capacityand control improvementsalong Airport Road corridor should be integrated and appropriately coordinated with the planned future improvement projects such as the SR44/ Airport Road interchange (ultimate) improvements, Hartnell Avenue realignment and extension and Venus Way extension.

The Project Proponent shall pay the proportionatefair- share cost of the above off- site improvements. The Project may have to make the necessary improvements without any participation by other projects due to timing. However, some form of reimbursement agreement should be entered into whereby the Project Proponent is reimbursed as other projects in the area are developed.

Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 7.4- 14
Rancho Road is expected to serve as an important commuter travel route for the project. With development of Phase 1, the intersections with Chum Creek Rd, Chum Creek/Victor Avenue, Shasta View Drive, and Old Oregon Trail will meet peak hour signal warrants and the existing roadway section from Airport Rd to Old Oregontrail will exceed acceptableillS " c" threshold. In addition, CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 25- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) the Victor Avenue and Chum Creek Road approachesto Rancho Road do not meet intersection spacing requirements.

4. 7. 4- 14
The intersections with Chum Creek Road, Shasta View Drive, Old Oregon Trail, and Chum CreekNictor shall be installed with traffic signals if these improvements have not been constructed beforehand. In addition, the Victor Avenue and Chum Creek Road approachesto Rancho Road shall be realigned and reconstructed so that the Rancho road/ Chum Creek RoadNictor Avenue intersection operates acceptably. The widening of Chum Creek Road and the bridge across Chum Creek from Victor to Bonnyview will also occur.

Rate of development of Phase 1 shall determine time of installation. Intersection WS and traffic warrants will be analyzedon a biennial schedule by a traffic engineerand the necessary improvementscompletedwithin one year ofthe first report that identifies WS levels are below C and/ or traffic signal warrants are met for the p. m. peak hour.

The Project Proponent shall pay the proportionate fair- share cost of the above off- site improvements. The Project may have to make the necessary improvements without any participation by other projects due to timing. However, some form of reimbursement agreement should be entered into whereby the Project Proponent is reimbursed as other projects in the area are developed.

The Rancho Road segment from Airport Road to Old OregonTrail shall be widened to a three- lane arterial standard under Existing plus Phase- l conditions.

Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 7. 4- 15
The Knighten Road corridor is expected to serve as one of the important truck travel route opportunities for project related truck trips. The unsignalized study intersection of Knighten Road. and Interstate 5 northbound ramps will meet the AM peak hour signal warrant Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Business Park 26- April 7. 2006Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

4. 7. 4- 15
A traffic signal will be installed at the northbound ramp intersection of Knighton Road and Interstate 5. The recommended signalization of Interstate 5/ Knighton Road northbound ramp intersection should be appropriately integratedwith long-tenn improvementsplanned for this interchange, as well as improvementsplanned for the 1- 5/Riverside Avenue interchange. The rate of development of Phase 1 shall detennine time of installation. Intersection WS and traffic warrants will be analyzedon a biennial schedule by a traffic engineerand the necessary improvementscompletedwithin one year of the first report that identifies WS levels are below C and/ or traffic signal warrants are met for the p. m. peak hour.

The Project Proponent shall pay the proportionate fair- share cost of these off- site improvements. The Project may have to make the necessary improvements without any participation by other projects due to timing. However, some fonn of reimbursement agreement should be entered into whereby the Project proponent is reimbursed as other projects in the area are developed.

Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 7. 4- 16
The Riverside Avenue corridor is expectedto serve as an important auto and truck travel route for. project related trips. The currently unsignalizedstudyintersections along Riverside Avenue, namely the intersections with Interstate 5 southbound and northbound, and North Street, will meet peakhour signal warrants.

Mitigation . Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings.

4. 7. 4- 16
The intersections with Interstate 5 southbound and northbound ramps, and North Street shall be installed with traffic signals under Existing plus Phase- l conditions. The recommended signalization of Interstate 5/Riverside Avenue interchange ramp intersections should be appropriately integratedwith long-tenn improvementsplannedfor this interchange, as well as improvements planned for the Interstate 5/ Knighton Road interchange.

The Project Proponent shall pay the proportionate fair- share cost of these off- site improvements.

Findings
Implementationof this mitigationmeasure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater BlIsiness Park 27- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

4. 8 AIR QUALITY
Significant Impact 4. 8. 3:"2
Stationary industrial SOUICe emissions may result in impacts that exceed acceptedthresholds upon full build out of the Park. ROG, Nox and PM- lO may all exceed thresholds.

4. 8. 3- 2
As noted in the Air Quality Element, projects with less than " Threshold A" emissions must apply only feasible Standard Mitigation Measures ( SMM). No projects are expectedto exceed level " A" thresholds although additional emissions after permit applications containing additional emissions are provided. These emissions should be considered together with the operational. emissions that are quantifiable now.

ProjectsexceedingLevel " B" thresholds are requiredto implement all SMMs and BAMMs and calculate emission reductions available from each mitigation measure using the reference tables ( or project-specific analysis) provided in the Air Quality Element of the General Plan.

All parcels shall be required to evaluate and quantify potential mitigation measures and resulting emission reductions resulting for PM- lO since to ensure that Level B thresholds are not exceeded when considered together with emissions for requesteduse.

Page36 of the Air Quality Element lists expectedranges and averages for emission reductions for mitigation measures for commercial and industrial projects.

Findings
Implementationof this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

4. 9 NOISE
Significant Impact 4. 9. 4- 1
The project will generate increased traffic on the existing roadway network, with traffic noise potentially increasing 0 to 10 decibels Ldn over baseline conditions. Noise increases from project traffic will result in impacts to residences along Argyle Road, Rancho Road, and at certain locations along Old Oregon Trail and Airport Road.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Bllsiness Park 28- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and IS required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these fmdings.

4. 9. 4- 1
The following fundamental noise control techniques should be considered when reviewing individUal projects to be developed on the parcelswithin the business park. For off- site road mitigation, City policy requires noise barriers in the form of walls or berms, or combination thereof along arterial streets that abut residential uses. Therefore, when off-:site road improvements are constructed in the future to accommodate ultimate buildout of the business park, noise barriers will have to be constructed along Rancho Road, Argyle Road, and in limited locations along Old Oregon Trail and Airport Road where the underlying General Plan designation is residential. Noise tests should be conducted to confirm that existing thresholds are being exceeded by 3 dB.

Use of Setbacks - Noise exposure may be reduced by increasingthe distance between the noise sources and receiving use. Setback areas can take the form of open space, frontage roads, recreational areas, storage yards, etc. The available noise attenuation from this technique is limited by the characteristics of the noise source, but is generally about 4 to 6 dB per doubling of distance from the source.

Use of Barriers - Shielding by barriers can be obtained by placing walls, berms or other structures, such as buildings, between the noise source and the receiver. The effectiveness of a barrier dependsupon blocking line- of- sight between the source and receiver, and is improved with increasing the distance the sound must travel to pass over the barrier as compared to a straight line from source to receiver. The difference between the distance over a barrier and a straight line between source and receiver is called the " path length difference," and is the basis for calculating barrier noise reduction.

Barrier effectiveness dependsupon the relative heights of the source, barrier, and receiver. In general, barriers are most effective when placed close to either the receiver or the source. An intermediate barrier location yields a smaller path-length-difference for a given increase in barrier height than does a location closer to either source or receiver.

For maximum effectiveness, barriers must be continuous and relatively airtight along their length and height. To ensure that sound transmission through the barrier is insignificant, barrier mass should be about 4 Ibs. / square foot, although a lesser mass may be acceptableif the barrier material provides sufficient transmission loss. Satisfaction of the above criteria requires substantial and well- fitted barrier materials, placed to intercept line of sight to all significant noise sources. Earth, in the form of berms or the face of a depressedarea, is also an effective barrier material.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Business Park 29- April 7. 2006Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) The attenuation provided by a barrier dep~nds upon the frequency content of the source.

Generally, higher frequencies are attenuated ( reduced) more readily than lower frequencies.

This results because a given barrier height is relatively large compared to the shorter wavelengths of high frequency sounds, while relatively small compared to the longer wavelengthsof the frequencysounds. The effective center frequencyfortraJfic noise is usually considered to be 550 Hz. Railroad engines, cars and horns emit noise with differing frequency content, so the effectiveness of a barrier will vary for each of these sources. Frequency analysesare necessary to properly calculate barrier effectiveness for noise from sources other than highway traffic.

Site Design - Buildings can be placed on a project site to shield other structures or areas, to remove them from noise- sensitive areas, and to prevent an increase in noise level caused by reflections. The use of one building to shield another can significantly reduce overall noise levels. Another option in site design is the placementof relatively insensitive land uses, such as commercial or storage areas, between the noise source and noise- sensitive receivers.

Site design should also guard against the creation of reflecting surfaces which may increase onsite noise levels. For example, two buildings placed at an angle facing a noise source may cause noise levels within that angle to increase by up to 3 dB. The open end of " U"- shaped buildings should point away from noise sources for the same reason. Landscaping walls or noise barriers located within a development may inadvertently reflect noise back to a noise- sensitive area unless carefully located. Avoidance of these problems while attaining an aesthetic site design requires close coordination between local agencies, the project engineer and architect, and the noise consultant.

Use of Vegetation - Trees and other vegetation are often thought to provide significant noise attenuation. However, approximately 100 feet of dense foliage (so that no visual path extends through the foliage) is required to achieve a 5 dB attenuation of noise. Thus the use of vegetation as a noise barrier should not be considered a practical method of noise control unless large tracts of dense foliage are part of the existing landscape.

Vegetation can be used to acoustically "soften" intervening ground between a noise source and receiver, increasing ground absOlptionof sound and thus increasing the attenuation of sound with distance. Planting of trees and shrubs is also of aesthetic and psychological value, and may reduce adverse public reaction to a noise source by removing the source from view, even though noise levels will be largely unaffected.

In summary, the effects of vegetation upon noise transmission are minor and are primarily limited to increased absorption of high frequency sounds and to reducing adverse public reaction to the noise by providing aesthetic benefits.

Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater BlIsiness Park 30- April 7. 2006 Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Significant Impact 4. 9. 4- 2
On- site noise producing activities could affect existing noise sensitive receptors on the east side of the project area.

4. 9. 4- 2
The CC& R' s shall require all uses developed within the Park to genetate noise levels which comply with City of Redding and Shasta County Noise Element standards at nearbyresidential uses.

During project review, the Development Services Director shall make a determination as to whether or not the proposed use would likely generate noise levels which could adversely affect residences to the east. If it is determined from this review that proposed uses could generate excessive noise levels at existing noise- sensitive uses, the applicant shall be required to prepare an acoustical analysis to ensure that all appropriate noise control measures are incorporated into the project design so as to mitigate any noise impacts. Such noise control measures include, but are not limited to, use of noise barriers, site- redesign, silencers, partial or complete enclosures of critical equipment, etc.

Findings
Implementationof this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 4. 9. 4- 3
Activities associated with construction will result in elevated noise levels, with maximum noise levels ranging from 85 to 90 dB at 50 feet. Construction activities would be temporary in nature and would likely occur during normal daytime working hours.

4. 9. 4- 3
Construction activities will adhere to the requirementsof the City of Redding with respect to hours of operation.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Bllsiness Park 31- April 7. 2006 Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

4. 10 IlAzARDs AND llAzARDous MATERIALS
Significant Impact 4. 10. 3- 2
Uncontrolled spills during implementation of the project could cause impacts to soils and water quality in the project area. Even with implementation of a hazardous substances handling plan, accidental spills could occur.

4. 10. 3- 2A
In addition to operational controls implemented from various plans and procedures, engineering controls should be incorporated into the design of facilities built for companies that will use hazardous substances. It is likely that all areas in which hazardous substances will be used will be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, or other engineeredmaterial. In addition to the standard surfacing, engineeringcontrols could include bermed and lined areas where hazardous materials will be offloaded, design of surface drainage so that spills, if they do occur, will move towards areas that do not drain directly to waterways adjacent to the site, and/ or installation of collection sumps in offloading areas.

4. 10. 3- 2B
If not part of spill response, environmental monitoring should be conducted after a spill is Cleaned up to verify that contaminants do not remain in the environment. Depending on the location of the spill, this monitoring could include sampling of soil, surface water, and/ or groundwater. At a minimum, the monitoring results should be reported to the Shasta County Environmental Health Department. Submittal of results to additional agenciesalso may be required. Post- spill monitoring will allow characterization of the extent of contamination, if present, and allow development of remediation plans before contamination can reach deeper groundwater (100 feet or more in the Project vicinity).

4. 10. 3- 2C
If not part of spill response, an investigation of the conditions and practices that contributed or led to the spill should be conducted by the responsibleparties. Ideally, this information would be used to update hazardous substances handling practices to reduce the chance for additional spills. At a minimum the investigation results should be reported to the Shasta County Environmental Health Department. Submittal of results to additional agenciesalso may be required.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Business Park 32- April 7. 2006 Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Findings
Implementation of these mitigation measures will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

5. 7 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION CUMULATIVE EFFECTS
Significant Impact 5. 7. 1- 1
As a result of the project, the unsignalizedAirport Road intersections with Hartnell Avenue, possibly Venus Way, Rancho Road, Terminal Driveway/KnightenRoad extension and Meadow View Drive will be operating at unacceptableWS " F" under 2025 base conditions. In addition, eastbound and westbound approachesat the Airport Road, Chum Creek Road/Dersch Road signalized intersection will not function properly.

5. 7. 1- 1
The currently unsignalized Airport Road intersections with Hartnell Avenue, Rancho Road, Terminal Driveway/KnightonRoad Extension and Meadow View Drive should be signalized under year 2025 base conditions. The Airport RoadN enus Way Extension ( future) intersection should also be signalized under year 2025 base conditions. Widening of the eastbound and westbound approaches at the Airport Road/ Chum Creek Road/Dersch Road signalized intersection is recommended under year 2025 base conditions.

Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 5. 7. 1- 2
The Rancho Road intersections with Chum Creek Road, Shasta View Drive, Old Oregon Trail, and the Chum Creek/Victor Avenue intersection will exceed the acceptableWS " C" and operate at an WS " F." In addition, the Victor Avenue and Chum Creek Road approachesto Rancho Road do not meet intersection spacing standards.

Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

5. 7. 1- 2
The Rancho Road intersections with Chum Creek RoadNictor Avenue, Shasta View Drive shall be installed with traffic signals if these improvements have not been constructed beforehand. In addition, the Victor Avenue and Chum Creek Road approachesto Rancho Road shall be realigned and reconstructed so that the Rancho Road/ Chum Creek RoadNictor Avenue intersection operates acceptably.

Findings
Implementationof this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 5. 7. 1- 3
The unsignalized study intersections along Knighten Road, namely the intersections with Interstate 5 southbound and northbound ramps, will meet Caltrans peakhour volume Warrant 11 ( urban areas) during at least one peak hour period.

5. 7. 1- 3
The Knighton Road intersections with Interstate 5 southbound and northbound ramps shall be installed with traffic signals. It is noted here that the Route 5/ Knighton Road Interchange Modifications and Knighton Road Extension PSR ( Approved, January 1998) has considered a four- lane overcrossing at the Knighton Road interchange along with other interchange improvements. The PSR improvements are expectedto provide sufficient capacity under year 2025 base conditions.

Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the. site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 5. 7. 1- 4
The Riverside Avenue intersections with Interstate 5 southbound and northbound ramps, and North Street, will exceed the acceptableillS " D" and " C" respectively.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 34- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

5. 7. 1- 4
Traffic signals shall be installed at the Riverside Avenue intersectians with Interstate 5 sauthbaund and narthbaund ramps, and Narth Street. It is nated here that the Narth Street/Riverside Avenue Improvements PSRE ( Approved July 1999) recammended a faur to. five- lane cross- sectian an Narth Street and Riverside Avenue approaches at the Narth Street/Riverside Avenue/ Airpart under 2020- 2025 canditians. The PSRE improvements are expectedto. provide sufficient capacity under year 2025 base canditians.

Findings
Implementatianaf this mitigatian measure will reduce the patentially significant impact to. the site to. a level cansidered less than significant.

Significant Impact 5. 7. 2- 14
The faur- Iane arterial sectian ( ar the expressway arterial " hybrid" sectian) far the Airpart Raad segment between the SR44 interchangeand the intersectian with Rancho. Raad will exceed WS " C." Mitigation Measures
Patential significant impacts resulting from the propasedproject wauld be reduced to. belaw a level af significance by implementatianaf the mitigatian measure belaw. The mitigatian measure ' has been faund to. be feasible and is required as a canditian af approval and made binding an the City through these findings.

5. 7. 2- 14
A faur- Iane expressway sectian shall be canstructed far the Airpart Raad sectian between SR44 interchangeand Rancho. Raad. The faur- Iane arterial sectian ( arthe expressway- arterial hybrid" sectian) far the Airpart Raad segment sauth from Rancho. Raad through the intersectian with Chum Creek Raad/Dersch Raad can be maintained through Year 2025 Base plus Project Build- aut co. nditians.

The Shasta Caunty InterchangeImprovement Study Final Repart (prepared far Shasta Caunty RTP A, July 1996) has co. nsidered two. canceptualinterchangeimprovement alternatives farthe SR. 44/ Airpart Raad/ Old Oregan Trail interchangethat bath included a six- lane avercrossing sectian an Airpart Raad. Preliminary analysis has indicated that bath af these interchange alternatives wauld provide sufficient capacity to. accammadate Year 2025 Base plus Project Build- aut canditians, while Alternative 2 (par- cIa canfiguratian with laap ramps) is expected to. provide mare efficient traffic aperatians.

All Airport Raad study intersectians shall aperate as signalized intersectians under Year 2025 Base plus Project Build- aut co. nditians.

The Project Propanent shall pay the propartianate fair- share cast af the abave aff- site improvements.

Findings
Implementatian af this mitigatian measure will reduce the patentially significant impact to. the site to. a level cansidered less than significant.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 35- April 7, 2006Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Significant Impact 5. 7. 2- 15
The Rancho Road segment between Chum Creek Road and Airport Road will have an unacceptable LOS " D."
Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure' has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these fmdings.

5. 7. 2- 15
The Rancho Road segment between Chum Creek Road and Airport Road shall be widened to three- lane arterial standards.

The Project Proponent shall pay the proportionate fair- share cost of the improvement of the road segment between Chum Creek Road and Airport Road.

Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 5. 7. 2- 16
The Chum Creek Road segment between Interstate 5 and Victor Avenue will have an unacceptable LOS " D."
Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings.

5. 7. 2- 16
The Chum Creek Road segment between Interstate 5 and Victor Avenue shall be widened to four- lane arterial standards.

The Project Proponent shall pay the proportionate fair- share cost of the improvement of the road segment between Interstate 5 and Victor Avenue.

Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 5. 7. 2- 17
The Knighten Road segment between Interstate 5 and Chum Creek Road will have an unacceptable LOS " D" and the intersections of Knighten Road with Chum Creek Road and with Interstate 5 southbound ramps will meet peak hour signal warrants.

CEQA Findings. Stillwater Business Park 36- April 7. 2006Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings.

5. 7. 2- 17
The Knighton Road segment between Interstate 5 and Chum Creek Road shall be widened to three- lane arterial standards, and traffic signals shall be installed at the intersections. Of Knighton Road with Interstate 5 southbound ramps.

The ultimate improvements identified in the Route 5/ Knighton Road Interchange Modifications and Knighton Road Extension PSR ( Approved, January 1998), that considered a four- lane overcrossing at the Knighton Road interchange along with other interchange improvements, are projected to provide sufficient capacity through Year 2025 Base plus Project Build- out conditions.

The Project Proponent shall pay the proportionate fair- share cost of these off- site improvements.

Findings
Implementationof this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 5. 7. 2- 18
The Riverside Avenue segment between Interstate 5 and North Street/ Airport Road will operate at an unacceptableLOS " D."
Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significanceby implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these findings.

5. 7. 2- 18
The Riverside Avenue segment between Interstate 5 and North Street/ Airport Road shall be widened to three- lane arterial standards.

It should be noted that the North Street/Riverside A venue Improvements PSRE recommended a four to five- lane cross- section on North Street and Riverside Avenue approachesat the North Street/Riverside Avenue/ Airport under 2020- 2025 conditions. The PSRE improvements are expectedto provide sufficient capacity under Year 2025 Base plus Project conditions.

The Project Proponent shall pay the proportionate fair- share cost of these off- site improvements.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 37- April 7. 2006 Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Findings
Implementationof this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

Significant Impact 5. 7. 2- 19
Hartnell Avenue between Airport Road and Argyle Road will operate at an unacceptableWS " D." Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to below a level of significance by implementation of the mitigation measure below. The mitigation measure has been found to be feasible and is required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these fmdings.

5. 7. 2- 19
The Hartnell Avenue segment between Airport Road and Argyle Road shall be widened to a three- lane arterial standard.

The Project Proponent shall pay the proportionate fair- share cost of these off~ site improvements.

Findings
Implementationof this mitigation measure will reduce the potentially significant impact to the site to a level considered less than significant.

B. Public Resources Code Section 21081 ( a)( 2)
The decision maker, having independentlyreviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR for the project and the public record, finds that there are no changesor alterations to the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental impacts that are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency.

C. Public Resources Code Section 21081 ( a)( 3)- lnfeasible Mitigation Measures & Alternatives The City of Redding, having reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR and its appendicesfor the project and the public record, finds that specific economic, legal, technological, social, or other considerations and benefits make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR and its appendices, other than the proposed action Alternative 2, Revised Stillwater Site, as described above under the headingProjectDescription, and as set forth below.

4. 8 AIR QUALITY
Significant Impact 4. 8. 3- 1
URBEMIS calculates construction impactswhich include emission site grading, construction worker vehicle trips, stationary equipment, mobile equipment (gas and diesel), architectural coatings, and CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 38- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) asphalt off- gassing. ROG ( Reactive Organic Gases) impacts are significant in Phase 3 of construction during architectural coating and asphalt application. The impacts are higher than thresholds allow for both minimum and maximum parcel sizes.

Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impactsresulting from the proposedproject would be reduced to the extent feasible, but may not be reduced below a level considered insignificant. This impact may result in project effects that cannot be mitigated. The mitigation measures below, however, have been found to be feasible and are required as a condition of approval and made binding on the City through these fmdings.

4. 8. 3- 1A
Potential mitigation measures should be reviewed with the Air District. The following measures were applied to reduce construction- related emissions. These measures are consistent with Goal 3, Policy 29 in the Air Quality Element to reduce particulate matter emissions from construction, grading, and demolition to the maximum extent feasible. Table 4. 8- 6 identifies the reduced emissions after application of mitigation measures.

Soil Disturbance:

Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas
Replaceground cover in disturbed area quickly
Water exposed surfaces 3 times daily
Cover stockpiles with tarp
Water unpaved haul roads
Off- and On- Road Measures
Use aqueous diesel filters
Diesel particulate traps
Cooled exhaust gas recirculation
ROG Coating measure:

Use coatings with no more than 0. 0037 lbs/ square foot of ROG ( default is 0.185 but low and zero ROG emission coatings are available

4. 8. 3- 1B
The City shall explore the feasibility of requiring Mitigation Measure 4. 8. 3- 1 in a Construction Emission Mitigation Plan in order to reduce emissions below threshold levels to the extent possible. Other measures to include in the plan are:

Equipment should not idle for more than 10 minutes.

Equipment should not be altered to increase engine horsepower.

Requiring particulate traps, oxidation catalysts, and other suitable control devices on all construction equipment used at the construction site.

Use ultra low sulfur diesel fuel ( sulfur content of 15 ppm or less) or other suitable alternative diesel fuel.

CEQA Findings, Stillwater Business Park 39- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) Establishment of work limitations to minimize trips and to provide staging areas for trucks located away from sensitive receptors.

4. 8. 3- 1C
Since construction emissions are higher than Level A thresholds, other potential mitigation measures that shall be included in the construction phasewould be to establish work limitations such as minimizing trips and providing staging areas for trucks that are located away from sensitive receptors such as the Valley Christian School or the future Veterans Home.

Another possibility, to the extent feasible, would be to phaseconstruction over a longer time period such as 36 to 48 months to minimize average daily effects. Other measures to explore would include slower phasing of the architectural coatingsand asphaltpavement phasesas well as lowering the amount of coating thickness of painting materials or building footage.

Findings
Implementationof these mitigation measures may not reduce this impact at the project site to a level considered less than significant. This potentiallysignificant impact will be acceptableto the City for the reasons presented above as well as' in the Statement of Overriding Considerations.

Significant Impact 4. 8. 3- 3
The nature of air pollution effects of any given stationary source dependson the nature of the use, the amount of throughput, fuels used, equipment used, controls used and many other factors which cannot be predicted without specifics on proposed uses such as would be provided by permit applicants. It is impossible to determine the potential stationarysource impactsuntil specificpermits are applied for.

Mitigation Measures
Potential significant impacts resulting from this activity are unknown at this. time. There is insufficient information to make a determination regarding whether the impacts would be significant or insignificant, and whether there are mitigation measures available that would be effective at reducingimpacts. The mitigation measure below provides information regardingthe potential for air quality impacts, but the lack of information makes this mitigation measure infeasible at this time.

4. 8. 3- 3
AppendixH in the Draft EIR providesdiscussion of each of the source categoriesand presents some examples of emissions from specific facilities that could be categorizedinto these source categories. The City may wish to use this Appendix as a reference tool. However, until an actual application is made and information provided, specific mitigation measures cannot be determined.

Findings
Implementation of this mitigation measure is inadequatefor addressingthe potential effects of this impact. Based upon technological and other considerations, the lack of sufficient CEQA Findings. Stillwater Bllsiness Park 40- April 7. 2006 Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) information regardingthe type or extent of the impact, and the unknown feasibility of mitigation, the City is unable to implement this mitigation measure.

THE PROPOSED PROJECT EIR EVALUATED TWO OTHER ALTERNATIVES IN ADDITION TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALTERNATIVE. IT ALSO INCLUDE][) A NO PROJECT" ALTERNATIVE.

ALTERNATIVE 1- ORIGINAL STILLWATER SITE
Project Description
This alternative is in the same location as the proposedproject alternative. The overall project description is the same as that described above. There are various differences in the on- and off- site infrastructure facilities. One of the primary differences is that this alternative has greater impacts to wetlands and sensitive speciesand their habitats in the northern portion of the site.

This alternative impacts over 2 acres more of wetlands and approximately 6 acres more of sensitive specieshabitats than the proposedproject alternative. It also contains a road connection to the east and more trails, which affect wetlands throughout the site. The electrical transmission line is located in more sensitive areas within the core project location. There is no conservation easement to be placed along the northern and eastern boundaries of the site, which prevents infrastructure connections to the adjacentproperties.

Findings
The City of Redding, as the lead agency for the Stillwater Business Park, has determined that Alternative 1 is infeasible because it results in impacts to wildlife, vegetation, and wetland communities that are unacceptableand difficult to mitigate. Potential impacts to the Stillwater Plains Conservation Bank would likely be unacceptableto approving officials. Obtaining the necessary regulatory agency permits and agreements for this alternative would require an unacceptable period of time, with no guarantee of success. This alternative would be very difficult and very costly to implement.

ALTERNATIVE 3 - JURIN RANCH SITE
This site is located on Rancho Road and Airport Road and totals 597 acres. Most of the site would have to be acquired. The City owns a small portion of the site along Clover Creek. There are 3 proposed residential developments nearing the end of their permitting and approval processes that encompass most of the site. The project would have approximately 100 acres of designatedopen space, which is about a third of the amount within the proposedproject. There would be about 2 acres more of wetlands impacts and 3 acres more of impacts to sensitive speciesand their habitats. The larger amount of wetland acreage impacted would make it more difficult to support this location as the " LEDPA" alternative, or. the alternative considered the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative as required by regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency. After a tour of the site with resource agencies, it was felt that the site was less desirable for development due to the diversity of its vegetation communities, wetlands functions and values, and important biological elements. The site is much smaller than CEQA Findings, Slillwaler BlIsiness Park 41- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 226
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.) the preferred alternative and lacks the large available parcelsdue to constraints on development resulting from wetland features on the site.

Findings
The City of Redding, as the lead agency for the Stillwater Business Park, has determined that Alternative 3 is infeasible because it results in greater impacts to Waters of the United States than other feasible alternatives; it would not provide as much acreage as other alternatives for meeting the purpose and need of the project; and over the time period of the environmental studies and preparationof the FEIRfEIS, the property was acquiredand plannedfor development, making it economically infeasible for the City to acquire for the project. Additionally, project effects would have resulted in significant impacts even after implementation of all feasible mitigation measures.

No PROJECT ALTERNATIVE
The No Project alternative would not result in any of the direct environmental impacts that the proposedproject would have. The City would save the initial resources expenditures as well as all capital costs associated with developing and constructing the project. However, the City would not benefit from the long-term economic returns that will be realized once the project is operational. The potential financial returns anticipated from the project will far outweigh all costs associated with establishing the site. There would not be a large-scale business park available in Redding to attract largebusiness. Industrial and large-business development would continue on a smaller scale, as it does today, which is undesirable to the City of Redding.

Findings
The City of Redding, as the lead agency for the Stillwater Business Park, has determined that the No Project alternative is infeasible because it does not provide a large scale business park in the City and it would not provide the desired long-term economic returns. 4-4-06
RFPEIR\Stillwater CEQA Findings-JO. wpd
CEQA Findings. Stillwaler Business Park 42- April 7, 2006 Packet Pg. 227
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK PROJECT
Attachment to Resolution No. 2006-_

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ( CEQA)

STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
The City Council hereby finds that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 ( b) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, having reviewed and considered the infonnation contained in the whole administrative environmental record, including the Environmental Impact Statement prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, the benefits of the proposed action - Alternative 2, Revised Stillwater Site - have been weighedagainstthe unavoidable environmental effects; and it has been determined that the unavoidable environmental effects are acceptabledue to the following considerations:

The economic, social, and other considerations of the project outweigh the unavoidable air quality impacts identified in the Findings.

The need for a business park with large parcels capable of attracting large businesses is of importance to the City.

A business park of this kind will enhance the tax base, create a synergy that will attract additional business to the area, and create more jobs.

The identified unavoidable impacts to. air quality are temporary, occurring only during construction. Th~ y are not permanent impacts.

Additional mitigation measures as outlined in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) may be available for further decreasingthe impacts, but may not be enforceable, available, or desirable.

Information supporting the overriding factors is outlined in the FEIR, Section 4. 8, Air Quality, and in the Findings of Significant Effects.
4- 5-06
RESO\ CC\Stillwater FEIS- EIRlOO- JO- CC. wpd
ITEM ( p - I
ATTACHMENTC-Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: 2006 Staff Report and Resolution (4.5(a)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5289 for Engineering Services to Ulteig Engineers, Inc.)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following relative to Bid Schedule No. 5318, Residential Single-Phase Solid-State Watt-Hour Meters:
(1) Accept the apparent low bid by Anixter, Inc., and award to Anixter, Inc. , for an annual evaluated cost of $334,570 . The contract period shall be from November 15, 2022, through September 30, 2023;
(2) Authorize the Purchasing Officer to extend the bid award annually with Anixter, Inc., through September 30, 2027, if mutually agreeable, with all terms and conditions remaining the same; the contract may be extended annually for four additional one-year periods through September 30, 2027, with price adjustments in direct proportion to the Producer Price Index.; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve changes to future pricing terms and policies as needed due to inflation and unstable economic conditions.

Fiscal Impact

Redding Electric Utility (REU) included funding for purchasing residential single -phase solid - state watt-hour meters (residential single-phase meters) in its adopted b udget for the Fiscal Year 2022-23. REU will include residential meter costs for future years as part of its biennial budget requests.

Alternative Action

The City Council could choose not to award the bid to Anixter , Inc. , and provide alternative direction to staff.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.5(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.5(b)--Award Bid Schedule 5318 Residential Single -Phase Solid -State Watt - Hour Meters
Nick Zettel, Director of
Redding Electric Utility
Packet Pg. 229
Report to Redding City Council November 30, 2022
Re: 4.5(b)--Award Bid 5318 Residential Single-Phase Solid-State Watt-Hour Meters Page 2

Background/Analysis

On Thursday, September 22, 2022, staff opened three bids for residential single -phase meters.

The three bids received were: General Pacific Inc., Anixter (Aclara) – Option A, and Anixter (Itron) – Option B. In the evaluation process, staff analyzed the bids based on the bid price and compliance with specifications. Staff requested both digital and radio reading capable meters in the bid . After the subsequent rescinding of “Option B” by Anixter due to a lack of produ ct availability for Itron radio reading capable meters , the apparent evaluated low bid was “Option A” from Anixter Inc. for $334,570. Staff determined a future bid will be released for radio read capable meters as needed.

This is a routine bid for residential single-phase meters through September 30, 202 3 (with up to four one-year contract extensions) on an as -needed basis, subject to the availability of budgeted funds. These single -phase electric meters are required to support new residential services an d replace the existing, aging residential single-phase meters.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^5318- Bid Tab
Packet Pg. 230

CITY OF REDDING

PURCHASING DIVISION - TABULATION OF BIDS
BID Residential Single Phase Solid State
Watt-Hour Meters
BID SCHEDULE NO. DATE OF OPENING
5318 September 22, 2022
Cannon/Whelen TIME OF OPENING
Nick Zettel 3:00 P.M.

QTY UNIT PRICE EXT PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT PRICE 8 155.48$ 1,243.84$ 67.25$ 538.00$ 87.75$ 702.00$ 8,640 68.80$ 594,432.00$ 35.50$ 306,720.00$ $37.25 $321,840.00 80 154.26$ 12,340.80$ 75.50$ 6,040.00$ $87.00 $6,960.00 240 184.82$ 44,356.80$ 75.50$ 18,120.00$ $97.25 $23,340.00 8 154.26$ 1,234.08$ 98.50$ 788.00$ $87.00 $696.00 24 154.26$ 3,702.24$ 98.50$ 2,364.00$ $87.00 $2,088.00 8 120V 2W, 1S, CL100 202.12$ 1,616.96$ $114.25 $914.00 960 240V 3W, 2S, CL200 98.18$ 94,252.80$ $55.25 $53,040.00 8 240V 3W, 2S, CL320 219.44$ 1,755.52$ $124.00 $992.00 8 120V 3W, 25S, CL200 202.12$ 1,616.96$ $115.00 $920.00 8 240V 2W, 3S, CL20 242.56$ 1,940.48$ $124.00 $992.00 8 240V 3W, 4S, CL20 219.44$ 1,755.52$ $124.00 $992.00 Sub-Total $760,248.00 $334,570.00 $413,476.00
120V 3W, 25S, CL200
Anixter (Itron) - Option B
General Pacific Inc
240V 3W, 2S, CL200
240V 3W, 2S, CL320
Anixter (Aclara) - Option A

DESCRIPTION
Bid Group I
240V 3W, 4S, CL20
120V 2W, 1S, CL100
240V 2W, 3S, CL20
Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: ^5318- Bid Tab (4.5(b)--Award Bid 5318 Residential Single-Phase Solid-State Watt-Hour

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following actions relative to sole -source procurement of equipment for the City of Redding Water Utility:
(1) Approve networking equipment from Cisco and Palo Alto in an amount not to exceed $450,000 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 to include system routers, ethernet switches, firewalls, and other network equipment and their associated licensing software and support service ; and
(2) Find that the action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 – Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact

There are adequate funds in the Fiscal Year 2022 -23 Water Utility budget for the $450,000 purchase of equipment. Funding this purchase will not impact other activities.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to authorize the purchase of network equipment directly from Cisco and Palo Alto and instead request quotes and award the various items through the standard competitive procurement process . This alternative may result in multiple manufacturers that are not compatible with the necessary equipment for the City’s water system network design nor meet the City of Redding ’s (City) Information Technology (IT) Department’s standard requirements to properly function with existi ng equipment. The Council may also provide alternative direction to staff.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Authorize Sole -Source Purchase of Network Equipment for the Public Works Department
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 232
Report to Redding City Council November 29, 2022
Re: 4.11(a)--Authorize Sole-Source Purchase of Network Equipment Page 2

Background/Analysis

In March 2021, the City ’s Water Utility contracted with communications consultants , TJCAA/JEGO Systems, to standardize and redesign the network/communication systems installed over the last 30 years . The current network system allows water treatment facilities, water storage reservoirs, groundwater wells, pump stations, and more to communicate via various types of radio telemetry and wide area network syste ms. The scope of work included evaluating the existing communications/networking system , identifying vulnerabilities, and recommending equipment to get to an acceptable level of cybersecurity protection. The redesign identified many obsolete products such as the cellular based Cradlepoint network that is past its useful end-of-life. Other potential cybersecurity risks were identified and new equipment is needed to resolve these issues.

In 2020, the Water Utility also performed a risk and resilience assessment (RRA), per the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s America’s Water Infrastructure Act – Section 2013.

Cybersecurity objectives identified in the RRA were designed into the new communication/networking system and will be implemented with this well-organized, reliable, and efficient communication system using the latest proven equipment, methods, and technologies.

The City’s IT Department was consulted to identify the most reliable and supported network equipment needed for the system including routers, ethernet switches, firewalls, and their associated licensing software and support services . The City uses a cooperative procurement method through the National Association of State Procurement Officials which would result in the purchase of thes e products at the lowest cost. The Cisco and Palo Alto products are a standard product offering tha t is used and integrated within the City’s existing network system platform. IT staff are trained and certified to operate Cisco products. The water network design plan provided by TJCAA/JEGO Systems specifically recommends Cisco and Palo Alto due to their industry-leading quality and product availability. Based on previous experience, the consultant does not recommend building a network with an assortment of manufacturers that are not compatible with the network design strategy nor meet the IT Department ’s existing networking platform.

Environmental Review

Staff has reviewed the project and determined that the project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public structures, equipment, and facilities. The existing network and communi cation system will be replaced to meet modern security and efficiency standards. The project will not result in expansion of use, as the project does not include the construction of new facilities. The action area does not have significant values for wildl ife habitat or other environmental resources and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Packet Pg. 233
Report to Redding City Council November 29, 2022
Re: 4.11(a)--Authorize Sole-Source Purchase of Network Equipment Page 3

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 234
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (4.11(a)--Authorize Sole-Source Purchase of Network Equipment)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5 302 (Job No. 5424-98) City Council Chambers Audio Visual (AV) Upgrade Project:
(1) Award to Conti, LLC, in the amount of $456,333;
(2) Approve an additional $52,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees and $61,000 for project development costs;
(3) Approve $46,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve addition al increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $10,000; (5) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 74th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $105,340 in funds for the project; and (6) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301(a) - Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact

The City Council Chambers AV Upgrade Project (Project) is being funded by Public, Education, and Government Access (PEG) fee revenues. There is no impact to the General Fund, as any costs absorbed now will be reimbursed by current and future PEG fee revenues.

Cost Summary
Item Amount
Project Development Costs $61,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $502,333
Contract Administration, Inspection, and Testing $52,000 Additional City Manager Authority $10,000
Total Project Costs $625,333

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5302, Job Order No. 5424 -98, City Council Chambers Audio Visual Upgrade Project and Adopt Budget Resolution Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 236
Report to Redding City Council November 22, 2022
Re: 4.11(b)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5302 City Council Chambers AV Upgrade Project Page 2

Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the proje ct development and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action

The City Council may choose to not award the bid for the Project and provide staff with alternative direction

Background/Analysis

The Project will upgrade the existing system with a complete and adequate operating system.

The following items are included in the scope of this project: a wireless mi c system, individualized monitors, video upgrades – to include an upgraded video panel and presentation management technology, a touch panel/control system, a broadcast system, features to enhance virtual meeting capabilities, Community Room upgrades, and a lobby kiosk.

Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on October 25, 2022, for the Project. The one bid in the amount of $ 456,333 was received from Conti, LLC, of Sacramento, California.

The engineer's estimate was $ 332,000. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $61,000 including staff, engineering, and consultant services costs. Construction contract administration and inspection costs for this project are estimated to be $52,000.

Environmental Review

Staff has reviewed the project and determined that the p roject is Categoricall y Exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301(a) - Existing Facilities. Class 1 exemptions include minor alteration of existing public facilities and equipment. The project will require modification of th e existing system and installation of new equipment. The upgraded audiovisual system will enhance communication, and make meetings more accessible for public meeting attendees. The updated equipment will be installed within the existing public facilit y and the project will not result in expansion of use. The action area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Bid Tabulation
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 237
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 74TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078
APPROPRIATING $105,340 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR THE COUNCIL CHAMBER UPGRADES PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
111

427 Non-Departmental

$105,340

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Beginning Balance
111-427-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance 105,340$
Increase Expenditures
111-427-4663-07 Council Chamber Upgrades $105,340
Total 105,340$ 105,340$

THAT the purpose is to appropriate $105,340 to increase funding for the council chambers upgrade project for fiscal year 2022-23.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of December, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(b)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5302 City Council Chambers AV Upgrade Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AV UPGRADE PROJECT
ENGINEER'S EST Conti LLC
10/25/2022 UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Audiovisual System
Upgrade LS 1 $332,000.00 $332,000.00 $456,333.00 $456,333.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $332,000.00 $456,333.00
Bid Schedule No.: 5302
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(b)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5302 City Council Chambers AV Upgrade Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(b)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5302 City Council Chambers AV Upgrade Project) Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (4.11(b)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5302 City Council Chambers AV Upgrade Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize issuance of a sole -source Purchase Order to JRC, Inc. , dba NorCal Presort for City of Redding mail services for the period of January 1, 202 3, through December 31, 202 3, in the approximate amount of $2 85,000 per year; and authorize the Purchasing Officer to extend the term on an annual basis for an additional five years, if mutually agreeable, with all terms and conditions remaining the same except for any increase in the United States Posta l Service rate, and an increase in the mail pro cessing per letter fee , not to exceed one cent , over the entire five year term.

Fiscal Impact

Currently, t he City of Redding ’s (City) cost for procuring mail services is approximately $270,000 per year. United States Postal Service ( USPS) postage rates account for approximately 85 percent of these charges with the balance remaining for JRC, Inc, dba NorCal Presort’s (NorCal) services. The City’s current biennial budget includes appropriations to pay these fees.

Alternative Action

The City Council could choose to not authorize the Purchase Order and provide direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

The cost of postage is set by USPS and is non -negotiable. However, the City receives the best possible postage discount because NorCal is able to merge the City’s varied outgoing mail with its other customers ’ mail to obtain volume discounts for which the City would not otherwise qualify.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.12(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.12(a)--Authorize issuance of Purchase Order to NorCal Presort for mail services.

Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 242
Report to Redding City Council November 22, 2022
Re: 4.12(a)--Purchase Order to NorCal Presort Page 2

NorCal provides mail processing services for the City which includes metering (affixing postage), barcoding, addressi ng, labeling, and handling various certified or tracked mail pieces.

Under the agreement for the year ending December 31, 2022, the charge for the service was seven cents per-item processed. The per-item cost is increasing to nine cents beginning with this Purchase Order, which is a net increase of approximately $15,000 per year. When an item of mail requires special service, an additional fee applies (as listed in the agreement).

NorCal has provided mail processing services for the City for more than 20 y ears and is the only local vendor able to provide the necessary services. If, during the annual review/renewal of this Purchase Order, another local provider becomes available, staff will initiate a request for proposal to determine the City’s best choice for mail services.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Daily Mail Service Agreement - 2023
2020 NorCal Extension and Daily Mail Service Agreement
Packet Pg. 243
Daily Mail Service Agreement

Effective January 1, 2023, and expiring on December 31, 2023, JRC Inc., NorCal Presort, has entered into a one year contract with the City of Redding. According to this agreement, the above named customer has contracted with NorCal Presort to process their first class mail, to apply the necessary postage and to deposit the mail with the U.S. Post Office under the following conditions:

1. Mail will be processed to obtain the allowed postage discounts, when possible, from the U.S. Post Office.

2. A mail processing charge will be applied at the following rates:
(Invoice Code)
A. .09 cents per letter, bar coded mail, 3oz. or less JOB 14 B. .35 cents per flat JOB 4 C. .52 cents per heavy flat JOB 6
D. 1.85 per certified JOB 2
E. 2.25 per insured JOB 7
F. 2.95 per registered JOB 10
G. .20 cents hand seal envelopes JOB 13
H. .05 cents per post card JOB 9
I. .07 cents no postage (prepaid) JOB 1
J. .055 cents full postage, non-machinable/Non BC JOB 17 K. 2.50 express mail JOB 3
L. 1.00 international mail JOB 8
M. 1% residual surcharge

3. All special mailings, standard bulk mailings, folding, inserting, or addressing jobs will be priced according to the condition of each individual job.

4. If NorCal Presort needs to insert the utility bills, the cost for that service will be:
*$30.00 rush fee
*$0.09 per utility bill with 2 inserts
$0.05 utility bill
$0.02 connects
$0.02 #9 return envelope
*0.11 per utility bill with 3 inserts
$0.05 utility bill
$0.02 connects
$0.02 additional insert
$0.02 #9 return envelope
Multi page bills will be an additional $0.02 per page, up to 5 pages

5. Mail to be delivered to NorCal Presort (1) one time per day @ approx. 12:30 p.m.

6. All invoices are due within 15 days from the invoice mailing date. A 1½ % late fee will be applied to all invoices over 15 days past due.

7. This agreement may be modified if the U.S. Post Office modifies its postage discounts or mailing requirements.

8. Either party to this agreement has the right to terminate this agreement upon 60 days written notice.

9. City of Redding shall be responsible to reimburse NorCal Presort for all postage applied to its First Class and Standard Mail.

Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: ^Daily Mail Service Agreement - 2023 (4.12(a)--Purchase Order to NorCal Presort) Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: 2020 NorCal Extension and Daily Mail Service Agreement (4.12(a)--Purchase Order to NorCal Presort) Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: 2020 NorCal Extension and Daily Mail Service Agreement (4.12(a)--Purchase Order to NorCal Presort) Packet Pg. 247
Attachment: 2020 NorCal Extension and Daily Mail Service Agreement (4.12(a)--Purchase Order to NorCal Presort)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve and authorize the following actions:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving an a mendment to the Executive Manag ement Pay -For- Performance Salary Plan (Unrepresented) adding a newly created classification titled Transit Manager, effective December 11, 2022; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 75th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021 -078 adding a full-time position of Transit Manager to the City of Redding Public Works Transportation Division.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact directly resulting from the approval o f a new Transit Manager classification. The estimated personnel cost (salary and benefits) for adding the budgeted position would be up to $185,000. Adequate funds are available within the current Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) budget.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could choose not to approve the amend ment to the Executive Management Pay-For-Performance Salary Plan for the new classification title and/or the addition of the budgeted position to address the RABA administration needs . Or, t he Council could provide staff with alternate direction.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.15(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(b)--Adopt Resolutions approving amendment to Executive Management Pay-For-Performance Salary Plan adding a new classification titled Transit Manager and adding a budgeted position for Redding Area Bus Authority.

Sheri DeMaagd, Assistant
City Manager
Packet Pg. 248
Report to Redding City Council November 30, 2022
Re: 4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt Page 2

Background/Analysis

Recently, a reorganization of the Public Works Department took place to better align resources and workload. In this change, the administration of the Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) was moved from Public Works to the City Manager’s office. Previous to the move, the day-to- day management of RABA was handled by an Assistant Public Works Director. RABA currently does not have a similar position ; however, the need for a similar position has been identified in order to maintain quality administration of RABA.

Staff recommends the creation of a new classification titled Transit Manager, and approval to fill the classification. The salary for the Transit Manager would be the equivalent to the Planning Manager ($9,454 - $12,291). For budgetary purpos es, the Transit Manager position will be placed into the existing Transportation Division for Fiscal Year 2022-23 along with the two other budgeted positions assigned to support RABA. As part of the next biennial budget, the three positions will be moved to a division assigned to the City Manager’s office.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Resolution
^Resolution - budget
^Transit Manager description
^Exhibit A to Resolution - ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-December 11, 2022 ^Exhibit B to Resolution - ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-July 9, 2023 Packet Pg. 249
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT

PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE SALARY PLAN FOR UNREPRESENTED
EMPLOYEES, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 11, 2022

WHEREAS, staff has recommended that the Executive Management Pay -For- Performance Salary Plan be amended to add a new classification titled Transit Manager, effective December 11, 2022; and

WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Redding deems it to be in the best interest of the City to adopt such recommendations; and

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding that the Executive Management Pay-For-Performance Salary Plan be amended.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

___________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

________________________________ ___________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 250
Attachment: ^Resolution [Revision 1] (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 75TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 20 21-078 APPROPRIATING $0 FOR THE CREATION OF ONE FULL TIME TRANSIT

MANAGER POSITION FOR THE REDDING AREA BUS AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
111
200
503
989
RABA
RABA
$0
$0

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE

OF FUNDS
Increase(Decrease) Expenditures
111-503-0111-01 Full Time Regular 56,730$
111-503-0171-01 Workers' Compensation 400
111-503-0173-01 Group Health Insurance 10,130
111-503-0175-01 Retirement Program 5,510
111-503-0177-01 Medicare 830
111-503-1894-01 RABA (73,600)
200-989-1919-01 Trans/Engineering 73,600
200-989-2112-01 Fixed Reimb. Public Works Admin (73,600) Total -$
PERSONNEL FY 2022-23

Transit Manager 1 FTE

THAT the purpose is to appropriate $0 for the creation of one full time Transit Manager position for the Redding Area Bus Authority for fiscal year 2022-23.

Packet Pg. 251
Attachment: ^Resolution - budget (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of December, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 252
Attachment: ^Resolution - budget (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) 202 CITY OF REDDING

TRANSIT MANAGER

DEFINITION:

Under general direction, manages, directs and coordinates the activities and operations of the Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) and the City’s public transportation programs; ensures that programs comply with federal, state and local funding requirements and regulatory agency standards; provides complex and highly responsive assistance; and provides public transportation information on an as needed basis.

EXAMPLES OF DUTIES:

NOTE: The duties performed by the Transit Manager include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Plan, manage, and direct the operations and services of various functions pertaining to public transit, Fixed Route and Paratransit services and related and programs; oversee transit-related operations, ensuring adherence to federal, state and local mandates.

Measures: Ensure transportation program meets all legal requirements.

2. Plan, develop and implement goals, objectives, and priorities for assigned operations, programs, projects and functions; recommend and implement policies and procedures.

Measures: Effectively implements goals, objectives and priorities. Polices are accurate and implemented to meet the needs of the City and the Department.

3. Prepare and administer assigned budgets; forecast funds needed for services, equipment, materials and supplies; perform cost/benefit analyses and funding justifications; represent the City and RABA during fund audits.

Measures: Budget submitted is complete, realistic and sufficient to meet known departmental and division needs. Budget is carefully monitored and no unavoidable deviations are made.

4. Negotiate and administer agreements with contractors and others for the provisions of services and capital acquisitions; ensure contract compliance and regulatory obligations; review and monitor the approval of expenditures.

Measures: Agreements are negotiated and administered to ensure services are provided in compliance with Federal and State regulations; efficiency of services that align with City customer services standards; and are cost effective and timely.

5. Plan, direct and coordinate service plan with contracted transit providers; monitor service Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: ^Transit Manager description (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) levels, evaluate procedures, consistently monitor/report regulatory performance and meet with providers to address problems and potential improvements.

Measures: Effectively and efficiently develops a professional plan that meets and/or exceeds state or federal regulatory requirements and goals and objectives of the City. Timely evaluation of programs and activities, including performance metrics, is completed, and improvements are made as necessary.

6. Identify, secure and administer new and ongoing transit funds through local, state and federal agencies; develop grant and other funding proposals; research, write and review requests for proposals/requests for bids; develop contracts and cost estimates; determine standards for contractual compliance; coordinate with the City Attorney and other Agency staff as needed to interpret and implement agreements.

Measures: All grant and program requirements are met; applications and reports are complete and submitted on time; program quality is maintained.

7. Oversee and develop transit marketing, bus stop and shelter placement, and related projects; coordinate with contractors and outside vendors regarding planning and marketing programs; develop and implement new schedules and routes; research, develop and oversee the creation, implementation and production of schedules, brochures, maps and other printed materials and transit website content.

Measures: Effectiveness and efficiency of marketing transportation services. Promotional activities are successful and cost effective. Promotional materials or campaigns are effective in increasing public awareness and participation. Materials are professional, complete, timely, and accurate.

8. Coordinate routes, schedules, fares and related matters with inter-county and other transit agencies to ensure that services meet the transit needs of citizens in the most cost-efficient manner; represent the City/RABA by attending meetings that pertain to local, state and federal transit systems; prepare and facilitate presentations and advice to City officials, Regional Agencies, committees and commissions.

Measures: Effective, efficient bus program within the Redding Area Bus Authority service area.

9. Collect and analyze data relating to routes, schedule, ridership and cost factors; prepare a wide variety of daily, monthly and annual reports and/or presentations for local, state and federal agencies.

Measures: Reports are clear, concise, well written, and informative. Reports are consistently completed and submitted in a timely fashion.

Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: ^Transit Manager description (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt)

10. Plan, coordinate, supervise and participate in complex transit-related plans and studies; analyze issues, identify solutions, and prepare recommendations.

Measures: Thorough, timely and accurate analysis.

11. Respond to inquiries and request for information; resolve service issues and complaints.

Measures: Represents the department in a professional and knowledgeable manner. Is organized and prepared to represent the department. Provides friendly and effective customer service and sets the tone for good customer relations, external and internal.

Demonstrates effective inter-personal and inter-organizational skills and a “can do” attitude.

Effective and thorough communication skills. Provide staff with appropriate training to handle such situations.

12. Provide staff assistance to Redding Area Bus Authority and related committees and boards; prepare and present agenda items, staff reports and other necessary correspondence.

Measures: Staff reports are clear, concise yet thorough, and accurate. Reports are delivered as needed. Presentations are clear and concise.

13. Serve as a City and RABA representative on a variety of transit boards and commission meetings.

Measures: Represents the City of Redding in a professional manner. Prepare and make public presentations. Serves as an effective resource person for the community.

14. Supervise, lead, train and evaluate assigned personnel; work with employees to correct deficiencies.

Measures: Activities and work are planned, scheduled and assigned in an effective and efficient manner in order to meet goals and requirements. Staff are provided quality supervision and training. Performance evaluations are completed in a timely and accurate manner.

15. Build and maintains positive working relationships with co-workers, other City employees, external resources such as vendors and contractors, and the public using principals of good customer service and leadership.

Measures: Demonstrates effective communication tec hniques, effective networking and relationship building skills. Utilizes effective public relations and leadership skills to build support of programs and activities. Cooperative relationships are maintained.

16. Perform related duties as assigned.

QUALIFICATIONS:

Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: ^Transit Manager description (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt)

Knowledge of:

Federal, State and local laws and regulations governing public transit system operations; modern transit system operating principles and practices; municipal budget preparation and monitoring of complex projects; State and Federal grant administration; techniques of contract administration; principles and practices of grant development and application processes; methods of research, program analysis and report preparation; modern office procedures and computer equipment including complex spreadsheet applications; business mathematics.

Ability to:

Administer the development and operation of municipal transit programs, including bus and paratransit; administer contractual agreements related to public transit programs; interpret and explain public transit policies and procedures; prepare clear and concise reports, including the compilation of statistical data; oversee service contracts and enforce contract compliance; develop and negotiate financial agreements, request for bids and proposals; develop and administer grant programs; prepare and present effective public presentations; analyze operating conditions, problems and data and recommend and implement appropriate solutions; research complaints and problems and prepare responses and correspondence for management; make sound independent judgment in complex or difficult situations; communicate clearly and concisely both orally and in writing; supervise, train and evaluate subordinate employees; establish and maintain effective working relationships with contracts, vendors and City staff.

Education:

Any combination of training and experience that provides the required knowledge, skills, and abilities is qualifying; typical education would include a Bachelor's Degree from an accredited college, university, or equivalent, with major course work in public or business administration, transit or transportation planning or management, or a related field.

Experience:

Typical experience would include three years of relevant progressively responsible professional experience in the areas of transit or transportation planning, transportation engineering, public transit operations or closely related field, including two years of supervisory experience.

Special Requirements:

Possession of the appropriate California driver's license, or the ability to acquire one within ten days of appointment.

Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: ^Transit Manager description (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt)

Est 11/2022
Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: ^Transit Manager description (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) Job Code Title
96 City Clerk (Elected Official) $600
97 City Treasurer (Elected Official) $600
30 Director of Electric Utility $17,516 – $22,772
31 Assistant Director of Electric Utility $15,924 – $20,702 35 Chief of Police $15,659 – $20,358
61 Electric Manager - Energy Management $14,448 – $18,783 84 Electric Manager - Engineering $14,448 – $18,783
40 Fire Chief $13,859 – $18,017
12 Assistant City Manager $13,729 – $17,848
88 Electric Program Supervisor - Energy Management $13,103 – $17,034 62 Electric Program Supervisor - Transmission & Distribution $13,103 – $17,034 20 Director of Public Works $13,075 – $16,998
76 Electric Manager - Power Production $12,356 – $16,063 69 Electric Manager - Financial $12,158 – $15,806
94 Chief Information Officer $12,158 – $15,806
63 Electric Manager - Customer Services and Metering $12,059 – $15,678 77 Electric Manager - Line $12,059 – $15,678
86 Electric Manager - Resources $12,059 – $15,678
42 Deputy Fire Chief $11,940 – $15,523
43 Director of Development Services $11,850 – $15,406
52 Director of Community Services $11,850 – $15,406
134 Assistant City Attorney II $11,602 – $15,083
66 Electric Manager - Compliance $11,553 – $15,020
67 Electric Manager - Technology $11,553 $15,020
87 Electrical Engineering Supervisor $11,314 – $14,708
64 Director of Finance $11,028 – $14,337
65 Personnel Director $11,028 – $14,337
18 Deputy City Manager $11,006 – $14,308
78 Electric Program Supervisor - Line $11,001 – $14,302 59 Electric Program Supervisor - Power Production $10,968 – $14,259 106 Assistant Director of Public Works $10,781 – $14,016 80 Electric Program Supervisor - Substations $10,740 – $13,963 41 Electric Program Supervisor - Meter Shop $10,740 – $13,963 89 Electric Program Supervisor - Service Planning $10,600 – $13,780 135 Assistant City Attorney I $10,507 – $13,660
81 Electric Manager $10,308 – $13,401
108 Electrical Engineer $10,299 – $13,390
68 Operations/Compliance Engineer $10,299 – $13,390
262 Power Plant Engineer II $10,299 – $13,390
112 Assistant City Engineer $10,190 – $13,248

CITY OF REDDING

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE SALARY PLAN
Effective: December 11, 2022
Monthly Salary Range

NO RANGE

NO RANGE
Packet Pg. 258
Attachment: ^Exhibit A to Resolution - ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-December 11, 2022 (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) Job Code Title Monthly Salary Range
82 Electric Program Supervisor $10,073 – $13,096
58 Electric Program Supervisor - Operational Technology $10,073 – $13,096 260 Electric Utility Senior Resource Planner $10,073 – $13,096 155 Electric Utility Senior Project Engineer $9,970 – $12,962 71 Assistant Director of Development Services/Building Official $9,904 – $12,876 93 Deputy Director of Public Works $9,833 – $12,783
54 Cyber Security Officer $9,567 – $12,437
138 Planning /Community Development Manager $9,454 – $12,291 202 Transit Manager $9,454 – $12,291
50 Assistant Director - Community Services $9,364 – $12,174 252 Municipal Utilities Manager $9,364 – $12,174
192 Electric Utility Operational Technology Engineer $9,267 – $12,047 116 Electric Utility Resource Planner $9,267 – $12,047
60 Finance Officer $9,158 – $11,906
72 Environmental Compliance Manager $9,013 – $11,717
127 Building Official $8,989 – $11,686
110 Electric Utility Engineer $8,825 – $11,473
261 Power Plant Engineer I $8,825 – $11,473
151 Deputy City Attorney $8,793 – $11,432
75 Airports Manager $8,708 – $11,321
103 Housing Manager $8,484 – $11,029
153 Deputy Building Official $8,429 – $10,958
182 Geographic Information Systems Manager $8,268 – $10,749 249 Field Foreman-Electrical Technician $8,259 – $10,737 95 Personnel Manager $8,140 – $10,582
90 Risk Manager $8,140 – $10,582
98 Administrator - Office of City Clerk $8,055 – $10,472 99 Administrator - Office of City Treasurer $8,055 – $10,472 131 Economic Development, Innovation and Equity Manager $7,929 – $10,308 121 Electric Utility Engineering Associate $7,721 – $10,038 105 Assistant Finance Officer $7,662 – $9,961
92 Parks & Facilities Manager $7,630 – $9,920
51 Communication Manager $7,600 – $9,880
195 Electric Utility Associate Resource Planner $7,489 – $9,736 107 Energy Services Account Manager $7,392 – $9,610
56 Senior Personnel Analyst $7,378 – $9,592
209 Assistant Airports Manager $7,260 – $9,438
136 Electric Utility Engineering Assistant II $7,045 – $9,159 166 Purchasing Officer $6,949 – $9,033
113 Electric Utility Field Foreman $5,362 – $8,720Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: ^Exhibit A to Resolution - ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-December 11, 2022 (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) Job Code Title
175 Management Assistant to the City Manager $6,607 – $8,589 150 Electric Utility Engineering Assistant I $6,397 – $8,317 165 Parks Superintendent $6,349 – $8,254
169 Recreation Superintendent $6,349 – $8,254
130 Fleet Manager $6,267 – $8,148
185 Police Services Manager $6,267 – $8,148
245 Executive Assistant to the City Manager $5,153 – $6,700 109 Reprographics Manager $5,153 – $6,700
Monthly Salary Range
Packet Pg. 260
Attachment: ^Exhibit A to Resolution - ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-December 11, 2022 (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) Job Code Title
96 City Clerk (Elected Official) $600
97 City Treasurer (Elected Official) $600
30 Director of Electric Utility $17,779 – $23,114
31 Assistant Director of Electric Utility $16,163 – $21,012 35 Chief of Police $15,894 – $20,664
61 Electric Manager - Energy Management $14,665 – $19,065 84 Electric Manager - Engineering $14,665 – $19,065
40 Fire Chief $14,067 – $18,287
12 Assistant City Manager $13,934 – $18,116
88 Electric Program Supervisor - Energy Management $13,299 – $17,290 62 Electric Program Supervisor - Transmission & Distribution $13,299 – $17,290 20 Director of Public Works $13,271 – $17,253
76 Electric Manager - Power Production $12,541 – $16,304 69 Electric Manager - Financial $12,341 – $16,043
94 Chief Information Officer $12,341 – $16,043
63 Electric Manager - Customer Services and Metering $12,240 – $15,913 77 Electric Manager - Line $12,240 – $15,913
86 Electric Manager - Resources $12,240 – $15,913
42 Deputy Fire Chief $12,120 – $15,756
43 Director of Development Services $12,028 – $15,637
52 Director of Community Services $12,028 – $15,637
134 Assistant City Attorney II $11,776 – $15,310
66 Electric Manager - Compliance $11,726 – $15,245
67 Electric Manager - Technology $11,726 $15,245
87 Electrical Engineering Supervisor $11,483 – $14,929
64 Director of Finance $11,194 – $14,552
65 Personnel Director $11,194 – $14,552
18 Deputy City Manager $11,171 – $14,523
78 Electric Program Supervisor - Line $11,166 – $14,516 59 Electric Program Supervisor - Power Production $11,133 – $14,473 106 Assistant Director of Public Works $10,943 – $14,227 80 Electric Program Supervisor - Substations $10,901 – $14,172 41 Electric Program Supervisor - Meter Shop $10,901 – $14,172 89 Electric Program Supervisor - Service Planning $10,759 – $13,987 135 Assistant City Attorney I $10,665 – $13,865
81 Electric Manager $10,463 – $13,602
108 Electrical Engineer $10,454 – $13,591
68 Operations/Compliance Engineer $10,454 – $13,591
262 Power Plant Engineer II $10,454 – $13,591
112 Assistant City Engineer $10,343 – $13,446

CITY OF REDDING

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE SALARY PLAN
Effective: July 9, 2023
Monthly Salary Range

NO RANGE

NO RANGE
Packet Pg. 261
Attachment: ^Exhibit B to Resolution - ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-July 9, 2023 (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) Job Code Title Monthly Salary Range
82 Electric Program Supervisor $10,224 – $13,292
58 Electric Program Supervisor - Operational Technology $10,224 – $13,292 260 Electric Utility Senior Resource Planner $10,224 – $13,292 155 Electric Utility Senior Project Engineer $10,120 – $13,156 71 Assistant Director of Development Services/Building Official $10,053 – $13,069 93 Deputy Director of Public Works $9,980 – $12,975
54 Cyber Security Officer $9,710 – $12,624
138 Planning /Community Development Manager $9,596 – $12,475 202 Transit Manager $9,596 – $12,475
50 Assistant Director - Community Services $9,505 – $12,356 252 Municipal Utilities Manager $9,505 – $12,356
192 Electric Utility Operational Technology Engineer $9,406 – $12,228 116 Electric Utility Resource Planner $9,406 – $12,228
60 Finance Officer $9,296 – $12,085
72 Environmental Compliance Manager $9,148 – $11,893
127 Building Official $9,124 – $11,861
110 Electric Utility Engineer $8,958 – $11,645
261 Power Plant Engineer I $8,957 – $11,645
151 Deputy City Attorney $8,925 – $11,603
75 Airports Manager $8,839 – $11,491
103 Housing Manager $8,611 – $11,195
153 Deputy Building Official $8,555 – $11,122
182 Geographic Information Systems Manager $8,392 – $10,910 249 Field Foreman-Electrical Technician $8,383 – $10,898 95 Personnel Manager $8,262 – $10,741
90 Risk Manager $8,262 – $10,741
98 Administrator - Office of City Clerk $8,176 – $10,629 99 Administrator - Office of City Treasurer $8,176 – $10,629 131 Economic Development, Innovation and Equity Manager $8,048 – $10,463 121 Electric Utility Engineering Associate $7,837 – $10,189 105 Assistant Finance Officer $7,777 – $10,110
92 Parks & Facilities Manager $7,745 – $10,068
51 Communication Manager $7,714 – $10,028
195 Electric Utility Associate Resource Planner $7,602 – $9,882 107 Energy Services Account Manager $7,503 – $9,754
56 Senior Personnel Analyst $7,489 – $9,736
209 Assistant Airports Manager $7,368 – $9,579
136 Electric Utility Engineering Assistant II $7,150 – $9,296 166 Purchasing Officer $7,053 – $9,169
Packet Pg. 262
Attachment: ^Exhibit B to Resolution - ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-July 9, 2023 (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt) 113 Electric Utility Field Foreman $5,362 – $8,851
Job Code Title
175 Management Assistant to the City Manager $6,706 – $8,718 150 Electric Utility Engineering Assistant I $6,493 – $8,441 165 Parks Superintendent $6,444 – $8,378
169 Recreation Superintendent $6,444 – $8,378
130 Fleet Manager $6,361 – $8,270
185 Police Services Manager $6,361 – $8,270
245 Executive Assistant to the City Manager $5,231 – $6,800 109 Reprographics Manager $5,231 – $6,800
Monthly Salary Range
Packet Pg. 263
Attachment: ^Exhibit B to Resolution - ExecMgmtSalaryPlan-July 9, 2023 (4.15(b)--Amendments to the Salary Schedule for Exec Mgmt)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following relative to the design, funding, permitting, engineering, and construction of improvements at South City Park:
(1) Approve the conceptual plan;
(2) Authorize the submission of an Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership application in the amount of $3.5 million to begin phase one construction of the South City Park improvements;
(3) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the Califo rnia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Sections 15301(d) – Existing Facilities, 15302(C) – Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303(d & e) - New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures; and
(4) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Program application process.

Fiscal Impact

Approving the conceptual plan has no direct fiscal impact. This decision will set a course in motion to secure the funding necessary to construct this park design.

The Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) Program grant application will request up to $3.5 million to begin phase one construction of the South City Park (Park) improvements. The ORLP Program requires a 50 percent match, which will be sourced from the CDBG Section 108 Loan authorized by the City Council (Council) at the November 1, 2022 , meeting and additional park development and grant funds . Funding for phase two elements of the Park project will require alternate funding sources and/or additional grants.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.6(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.6(a)--Consider conceptual plan and authorize submittal of the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Grant Application for South City Park in the City of Redding.

Kim Niemer, Community
Services Director
Packet Pg. 264
Report to Redding City Council December 1, 2022
Re: 9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park Page 2

Alternative Action

The Council could choose to not approve the conceptual plan, decline to apply for the funds under this grant opportunity, or provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis

South City Park, Redding’s oldest park, is nearly 100 years old and is uniquely poised to serve the community. It has, within its boundaries, a baseball field, bocce ball courts, tennis courts, a basketball court, walkways, and open grassy areas for p icnicking, sitting, and other informal uses. In recent years, community utilization decreased , and the Park needed revitalization to return to its original vibrancy. On November 16, 2021, staff presented a proposal to the Council, recommended by the Commun ity Services Advisory Commission, to conduct a broad community engagement effort regarding the future of the Park.

Since the City Council approved a thorough community process to address the future of the Park in November 2021, the Community Services Depa rtment has launched a series of engagements.

Three open houses were conducted — two in -person and on -site and another through Zoom.

Community Services Department staff led discussions and used pop -up boards to collect data that reflects the priorities of the community. Staff also created an online survey in order to reach greater community engagement and reach those who were not able to be heard or were unable to attend open houses. From December 1 through January 19, the public survey collected almost 1,300 responses. Results highlighted the difficulty in accessing the park by foot or bike and the perception of a current lack of safety when utilizing the Park.

Staff retained the services of Project for Public Spaces (PPS), a multi -disciplinary firm that ha s facilitated many public placemaking community engagement efforts, published multiple studies and reports on the subject, and assisted communities in reactivating neglected public spaces. PPS made two extended site visits and convened over a dozen focus g roups as well as key interviews.

At the June 16, 2022, meeting, the Council approved a concept to reimagine the Park and authorized staff to refine the concept, develop a program, and estimate project costs with PPS.

At the Council meeting on November 15, 2022, the Council requested the item be reconsidered at the December 6, 2022, meeting.

The consideration is for the updated conceptual plan, including a revised layout including:

• Arrival and activities plaza (7,300 sq. ft.)
• Destination playground (25,200 sq. ft.)
• Multi-use pavilion (4,500 sq. ft.)
• Covered porch (1,600 sq. ft.)
• Flex lawn (26,500 sq. ft.)
• Pickleball Courts (17,280 sq. ft.)
• Youth area (12,000 sq. ft.)
• Fenced dog area (6,000 sq. ft.)

Packet Pg. 265
Report to Redding City Council December 1, 2022
Re: 9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park Page 3

The design draws from over 40 years of placemaking work in communities large and small, focused on bringing neglected and underutilized spaces back to life. It layers a variety of activities, age groups, active and passive uses, and schedules to build an attractive and active public space. The design for the Park creates a new focal entry point, a circulation pattern, an arrangement of activity spaces, and other necessary features such restrooms, storage, tables, chairs, benches, bike racks, and portable play items.

The suggested program matrix (page 28 -31) includes a variety of daily, weekly, monthly , and annual events with seasonal offerings such as musical performances, specialty markets, lawn game tournaments, chili cook-offs, Paesano Days, Library programs, and more.

Construction costs are estimated at $8-$10 million, which exceeds the existing $2.5 million budget, and staff is seeking additional funding to begin engineering and construction of the plan.

The ORLP is a National Park Service (NPS) grant program focusing on communities with little to no access to nearby, publicly available, outdoor recreation opportunities in urban areas. The program funds the acquisition or development of new parks and substantial park renovations in economically disadvantaged cities or towns of at least 30,000 people. Use of this grant source will require the City to ensure that South City Park remain an outdoor recreation use area into perpetuity.

ORLP includes two competitive processes. California’s Department of Parks and Recreation reviews applications, selects finalists, and then forwards the finalists to the National Park Service for a nationwide review. Applications are due December 15, 2022 , and the estimated award date is January 1, 2024. The application will request approximately $ 3.5 million to implement phase one of construction, which could include features such as the playground, pickleball courts, flex lawn, entry plaza , and youth area. Staff anticipates needing additional funding sources for the remaining project elements that will be considered by the Council at a future meeting.

Environmental Review

Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Sections 15301(d) – Existing Facilities, 15302(C) – Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303(d & e) - New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures. Class 1 exemptions include the minor alteration of existing public structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of new small facilities and equipment, or conversion of existing structures. The existing park will be renovated to meet public recreational needs with modern accessible amenities that meet public safety standards. The project will be located on the same site, will have the same purpose and capacity, and will result in a negligible expansio n of use. The action area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

If the City receives a grant, the National Park Service will conduct a coordinated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review with the City. No further action is required at this time.

Packet Pg. 266
Report to Redding City Council December 1, 2022
Re: 9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park Page 4

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel sec ure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
Project for Public Spaces Final Report
South City Park CEQA NOE
Packet Pg. 267
South City
Park: Design
and Activation
Redding, California
November 2022
pps.org
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 2 Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 3 Table of Contents
Part One: Placemaking
6 Project Overview
8 Access
9 What Makes a Great Place
12 Engagement
Part Two: Visioning
16 Park Vision
17 Power of 10+
18 Major Themes
21 Overcoming Challenges
Part Three: Activation & Design
26 Programming
28 Calendar of Events
30 User Experience Diagrams
32 Park Destinations
60 Full Plan and Schematic Design
New!
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 4 6 Project Overview
8 Access
9 What Makes a Great Place
12 Engagement
Part 1:

Placemaking
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 5 This chapter includes context for South City
Park, an introduction to Project for Public
Spaces’ Placemaking process, and a summary
of our engagement.

Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 6 Project Overview
An Introduction to the Park’s Location and Context
South City Park has the potential to be the urban
park jewel of Redding. Located within walking
distance of revitalizing downtown Redding and
over 1000 homes, Redding City Hall, and in direct
proximity to the Redding Library and Tiger Field,
the park can become an attractive, dynamic,
vibrant community destination.

Three years ago it was fenced and use has been
limited. The City of Redding is committed to
re-developing South City Park to better serve
the needs of current residents and others for
decades to come.

The new South City Park will be both a lush,
modern front porch and a relaxing backyard
for residents of Redding: a place to play, gather,
celebrate, exercise and play sports or cool off
in the shade. It will offer a new destination for
families, active recreation spaces, and intimate
garden experiences along with year-round
activities, performances, festivals, games, food
and markets in a light, multi-use pavilion.

Transforming South City Park into a stronger
community destination is a testament to the
City of Redding’s desire to explore a different
kind of park space in this part of town. While not
large in size, the park can once again become
a great place for families, youth and seniors to
enjoy, demonstrating the City’s commitment
to quality of life and to an inviting, dynamic
and convivial urban park experience close to
downtown.

An evolving space, the renovated park is
intended for families with children, nearby
residents, seniors, youth, sports clubs and
leagues, library patrons, downtown residents,
and the people of Redding in general. As more
activities and destinations attract regular users
here on a daily basis, the park will succeed by
allowing room for flexibility as community needs
and park audiences grow and evolve.

Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 7 Overhead view of South City Park
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 8 Access
Placing activity with an understanding of the space
View from the Safeway to the South City Park
entrance with skinny sidewalks, 6 car lanes, and
no crosswalk
One of our initial steps is to study the space to understand how visitors would engage, see, and learn about South City Park and all the upcoming exciting activities it will have to offer. Visual access, in addition to physical connection, was a major consideration in locating programs and activities that were discussed during engagement. We know that a good public place actually starts on the street. Someone that hasn’t seen a calendar of events, an e-newsletter, or other important outreach should still be able to recognize that something interesting is happening in the park.

An active and welcoming outer park is essential to the well-being of the inner park. Developing an identity strategy for the streets surrounding the South City Park will lead people from the surrounding areas into the Park. Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 9 KEY A TTRIBUTES

INTANGIBLES

MEASUREMENTS

SOCIABILITY
AC

CESS&LINKAGES COMFORT&IM
AG
E

USES &ACTIVITES

SUSTAINABLE

CELEBRATORY

INDIGENOUS
USEFUL
REAL

SPECIAL

VITALACTIVE
FUN

HISTORIC

ATTRACTIVECHARMING

SPIRITUAL

SITTABLE

WALKABLE
GREEN
CLEAN
SAFE

CONTINUITY

PROXIMITY

CONNECTED

READABLE

WALKABLE

CONVENIENT

ACCESSIBLE

WELCOMING

INTERACTIVE

FRIENDLY
PRIDE

NEIGHBOURLY

COOPERATIVE

STEWARDSHIP

DIVERSE

RETAIL SALES

RENT LEVELS

PROPERTYVALUES

LAND USE

PATTERNS

LOCAL BUSINESS

OWNERSHIP
CRIME

STATISTICS

SANITATION
RATING

BUILDINGCONDITIONS

ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA

NUMBER OF
WOMEN

CHILDREN AND

ELDERLY

SOCIALNETWORKS

VOLUNTEERISM

EVENING USE

STREET LIFE

TRAFFIC
DATA

MODE SPLITS

TRANSIT USAGE

PEDESTRAINACTIVITY

PARKING USAGE

PATTERNS
PLACE
What makes a great place?
In his studies of public space, William H. Whyte
observed the key indicators of a great place. These
places have a high proportion of people in groups
and a wide variety of activities. People show
affection to one another there, and a variety of
users feel welcome.

When people describe such places, words like “safe,” “fun,” and “welcoming” come up repeatedly.

These types of adjectives describe the intangible qualities of a particular space. Intangible qualities can be measured quantitatively by using existing statistics or by conducting new research.

In studying more than 3000 public spaces around the world, PPS has found four key qualities that generate these patterns of behavior, emotion, and measurable outcomes in public space (see Place Diagram, above). Great places are sociable, have a variety of uses and activities, are well-connected to their surroundings, and are comfortable and welcoming. The most successful spaces always have all four characteristics.

Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA1010 Activities are the basic building blocks of great
places: They are the reason why people visit in
the first place, and why they continue to return.

They are also what makes a place special or
unique. When there is nothing to do in a place, it
will sit empty and unused‚ a sure sign something
needs to change.

ACCESS & LINKAGES USES & ACTIVITIES
Access means how well a place is connected to
its surroundings, both visually and physically.

Accessible places are conveniently reached
on foot or by bike. Transit should be nearby
in communities that have it, and in those that
don’t, high-turnover parking can ensure access
without sacrificing the area parking facilities.

Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 11 There is something unmistakably special
about a public space that fosters socialization.

When people see friends, meet and greet their
neighbors, and feel comfortable interacting with
strangers, they tend to feel a stronger sense of
space and attachment both to their community
and to the public space.

The success of a public space depends on
whether people find it comfortable and maintain
a positive image of it in their minds. This positive
perception includes considerations of safety,
cleanliness, and the availability of places to sit.

The importance of giving people the choice to
sit where they want cannot be overstated.

COMFORT & IMAGE SOCIABILITY
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 1212
Since the City Council approved a thorough community process to address the future of South City Park in November 2021, the Community Services Department has launched a series of engagements. Three open houses were conducted — two in- person and on-site, and another over Zoom. Community Services led discussions and used pop-up boards to collect the priorities of the community. They also created an online survey in order to reach greater numbers than were able to be heard or were unable to attend open houses. From December 1 - January 19, the public survey collected over 1,300 responses. Results highlighted the difficulty in accessing the Park by foot or bike and the perception of safety currently lacking for many.

FOCUS GROUPS AND INTERVIEWS
Project for Public Spaces’ site visit in February 2022 included two full days of focus groups and interviews. These discussions allowed us to understand what is missing in the community and what already exists to build off of, as well as a good background in how South City Park was used in the past, the nostalgia the community holds for the park, and its fencing three years ago.

These engagements also helped increase awareness of the project and understanding of the work needed to include the community in program planning of the new South City Park.

PPS began the focus group series with representatives from Good News and Redding Police. Before the park was fenced, there was a large amount of camping in the park by unhoused people. To prevent this from occurring again, the park plans to close the gates at night. The desire for safety was very prevalent during conversations with the community, and this is because they do not feel safe when they see the number of homeless in the parking lot and near the library now. A lawn area along Parkview Avenue where a group hangs out is especially discouraging to potential library and park users. While clients at Good News Rescue Mission have to leave campus during the day, Mission staff and the police began discussing the idea of using a potential micro site shelter as a day center. This space could include picnic tables, shade, recharge stations, and serve as a relocated food drop-off from the library in a place where they can feel comfortable. When South City Park is reopened, activity throughout the day will very likely deter the homeless. The best way to keep the park usable for all members of the community Community Engagement
PPS conducting public
engagement in Santa Clara.

Surveys and Focus Groups
Focus Groups and Interview
Participants with PPS included
Representatives from:
• Good News
• Redding Police
• Event Planners
• Shasta Library Foundation
• Local Architects
• McConnell Foundation
• Local Informal Sports Organizers
• Shasta Living Streets
• Livable Communities
• Library Staff
• Shasta Growers Farmers Market
• Parks + Recreation
• Shasta Arts Council
• Local Event Producers
• Public Health/Healthy Living
• West Redding Little League
• Redding Colt .45s
• Community Members + Neighbors
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 13 is to keep it activated throughout the day, year-
long. We also discussed how the park could
host Mission peer outreach and job placement
programs.

In multiple focus groups with neighbors, local
designers, and event planners, the conversation
focused on activity and the need for recreation
storage. While they want a host of sports for all
ages, the groups didn’t see enough demand to
maintain the number of existing tennis courts
and that some of this space could be relined
for growing sports like pickleball. They also
mentioned the desire to see more use of Tiger
Field outside of the Colt .45s’ season. West
Redding Little League also told us that Tiger
Field could host older Little League divisions
like Juniors and Majors, which would then open
up K1, K2, and K3 to more younger play which
has overwhelming demand. In discussing the
need for a destination playground, they also
pointed out that there needs to be shade,
plenty of seating for guardians, bathrooms, and
potentially a water feature or mister to combat
those hot days. Many people also mentioned the
need for something iconic, or “Insta-worthy”, to
symbolize South City Park. Some recalled the old
carousel or the hope for a unique identity with
public art.

In talking with Parks and Recreation, we heard
that there is great demand and not enough
space for summer camps. Camps with staff
can be great eyes and constant users of the
park. Library staff also see need for more teen/
after-school age programming. There are also
many homeschooling families that could move
between the library and the park.

We also discussed the events and programming
that is missing in Redding. Neighbors are
looking for more games for twenty-somethings
like blanket bingo, cornhole tournaments, or
fitness classes. There was also lamenting for a
loss of accessible plug-n-play venues for high
school bands and other young artists. The
community was especially inspired by the work
of Shasta Living Streets’ Streets Lab’s programs
and yearn for an ongoing Fall Fest and other
recurring seasonal events, as well as markets
and beerfests. The McConnell Foundation also
focused on a desire for the park to be able to
serve the community beginning as kids and
continuing throughout their lives. They also
brought up need for a multi-use building, a
desire heard throughout many of our meetings.

They suggested it have movable walls to open
up more or less depending on need or weather.

They shared that there are a lot of people that
want to practice and participate in messy art. It
could also serve as an event space, fair/market
space, winter activation, and protection from
the heat. In later meetings including Healthy
Shasta and the Farmers Market, we expanded
the needs to include space for prepared food
classes or vendors.

Across the board, people we talked to remarked
that the park was not very accessible. It is
unclear how to enter as a pedestrian or biker,
or where to leave a bike. In a meeting including
CalTrans, Shasta Living Streets, and Chief of
Staff to State Senator Dahle, we discussed
the problems in the park’s edges. Many routes
to the park lack sidewalks on one side or are
too narrow for even one person to pass just
one other without stepping onto the busy, fast
car lane. There is also not a safe pedestrian
crossing from the Safeway side of the street
or downtown, nor is their a bike lane. These
obstacles create a “dangerous freeway feel”
around the entire park which makes it hard to
be a neighborhood park. In meeting with library
staff, they also remarked that there is not a
good flow from library to park wherever you
come in.

Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 14 16 Park Vision
17 Power of 10+
18 Major Themes
21 Overcoming Challenges
Part 2:

Visioning
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 15 With the broad and innovative thinking of
Redding’s city government, an involved and
caring citizenry and several strategically
located community destinations nearby, South
City Park could become an inspiration for
defining a new role for parks in the city.

Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA16 Park Vision
Goals and Opportunities
Redding has a unique opportunity for South City
Park to become a catalyst for strengthening
and building the entire community. With the
broad and innovative thinking of Redding’s city
government, an involved and caring citizenry
and several strategically located community
destinations nearby, South City Park could
become an inspiration for defining a new role
for parks in the city. This new role puts the
urban park at the forefront of the city’s civic
spaces and goes beyond viewing it as a purely
recreation facility.

South City Park is uniquely poised for this new
role -- it has within its boundaries a baseball
field, bocce courts, tennis courts, a basketball
court, walkways, and open grassy areas for
picnicking, sitting, and other informal uses.

Directly adjacent to the park are the Redding
Library and Tiger Field along with plenty of
parking. The park is near two residential
neighborhoods and only a short distance from
revitalizing downtown Redding. In addition,
Redding City Hall with its ample grounds is just
two blocks away.

Taken separately, each of these places offer
little more than a single experience to potential
visitors and users. With some thoughtful
renovation, and strategic replacement of
underused facilities with uses that would attract
families, and other users throughout the day,
South City Park could provide a special and
meaningful “park” experience of several hours
or more.

To create this type of experience would
mean that the Library, Tiger Field, the park,
and City Hall would function together to
expand and enrich the place. Some of the
ideas that came out of the community
engagement process in the park suggested
certain first steps to consider. For example,
there was an idea to develop a multi-use light
structure or community pavilion in the park
for performances, markets, and community
celebrations. Another was that the parks
department would work to better connect
the park and library by offering an expanded
outdoor space for library programming in the
park and linking existing programs, such as
story time, to the benefit of both library and
park.

There are also improvements to be made to the
park that would attract families with children,
youth, and seniors. For example, the existing
walking path could be connected around the
park and signed with distance markers to make
it into a continuous loop, underused courts
could be re-purposed to other games to attract
more users, the site of the former play area
could be developed for other uses. There are
many other ideas that were raised during the
community engagement and will be explored in
the vision for re-developing South City Park.

This vision starts with the central idea that if the
park is to become a vital and active community
destination, it needs to attract a critical mass
of people throughout the day, and it needs to
be thought of broadly and in conjunction with
various other uses and potential programming
partners.

Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 17 Power of 10+
A great destination has at least 10 places within it, each with 10 things to do.

The Power of 10+ is a concept that highlights the importance of having multiple interrelated uses and spaces across various scales – starting from a micro-place up to parkwide, neighborhood and even city-wide scale. This means that it is not enough to have just one great place in South City Park — a number of them are needed to create a truly lively destination.

Any great place itself needs to offer at least 10 things to do or 10 reasons for people to be there.

These could be very simple and include a place to sit, a playground to play in, a garden to enjoy, art to contemplate, games to play, music to hear, food to eat, history to experience, and people to meet.

Ideally, some of these activities would be unique to South City Park and interesting enough to keep people coming back. The people who use the place most regularly are the best source of ideas for what uses are needed and desired.

The Power of 10+ offers a clear framework that not only helps examine existing places and prioritize places for improvement but can motivate residents and a variety of partners to take action. This approach shows that by starting efforts at the smallest scale big things can be accomplished. The concept also provides tangible goals to strive for and helps organize the re-development efforts as we envision a busy, dynamic, and enjoyable South City Park.

PLACE
10+ things to do
(layered to create synergy)

CITY/REGION
10+ major destinations

DESTINATION
10+ places in each
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 18 Major Themes
Key qualities will guide activation efforts and become
hallmarks of the new South City Park
The community engagement process, including
the focus groups and interviews conducted by
Project for Public Spaces, as well as the survey,
open house, and pop-up led by the Community
Services Department, generated an exciting
number of ideas, comments, reminiscences,
and recommendations. We also heard and
acknowledge concerns about certain challenges
for the park, and its surroundings. Outlined
below are some of the major themes that can
help organize program ideas, design concepts,
and practical solutions to challenges.

A UNIQUE (URBAN) PARK EXPERIENCE NEAR

DOWNTOWN REDDING
The City of Redding already has a robust and
successful system of city parks that are well
loved and well used by residents. Many of these
parks are larger, and boast spectacular natural
features, as well as high quality community and
recreational facilities and programs. While South
City Park doesn’t offer unique natural features,
it has the potential to offer a unique urban
park experience in proximity to downtown.

Many of the participants in the engagement
process had fond memories of using the park
when they were young as a place to play and
relax. Capitalizing on its location, the park
needs an update that will revive this urban park
experience but with renewed features and
contemporary attractions. For this strategy to
work, the park should be focused on supporting
a mix of programs and activities that will keep
bringing users throughout the day, the week,
and the year. The key to restoring the park to its
former importance as a community destination
is making it into a welcoming place for families
once again. Destination play, comfortable
restrooms, and exciting programming for all
ages are all elements to be considered.

OFFER FOOD AND COMFORT
In the words of William “Holly” Whyte, “If you
want to seed a place with activity, put out food”.

Many of the world’s most successful parks
anchor activity and economic opportunity
around food offerings. Whether a simple café, a
sit-down restaurant, or an ice cream cart, food
is in high demand in city parks. Since this area
of town has limited food options, stakeholders
felt that offering simple food options at a
community pavilion, or in a food truck or cart,
would be key to attracting people to renovated
South City Park. The success of this type of
offer depends very much on attracting enough
customers to make this a good place for
business. Developing a food offer in the park
may start with Italian ice in the afternoon when
kids come to the park after school, or with
morning coffee timed with the library’s story
time. Food vendors could also be given a priority
for larger events and festivals if they are willing
to be in the park on regular weekends.

Food truck in Indianapolis, IN
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 19 Pickleball game at Hot Springs Village, AK

A SETTING FOR FESTIVALS, CELEBRA TIONS AND

SPECIAL EVENTS
There is interest from stakeholders and
residents to see the park become a site for
festivals, celebrations and community events,
with events that build off Colt 45 games, but
also ones that bring in new audiences and
activities. Existing ample parking nearby, along
with the fence around the park making it a
venue that could host ticketed events, but also
a space where parents with children can enjoy
event activities, knowing their kids can run
around in a protected environment. In the short
term, events can be hosted here using portable
equipment - stage, lights, port-a-potties, etc.

In the long-term, hosting could center on a
potential outdoor stage area attached to the
community pavilion with necessary power
and water supply for outdoor performances,
events, and festivals. This could fill the need for
an accessible venue for teen bands and young
emerging artists, as well as a highlight event for
the reemergence of Market Fest and outdoor
jazz and blues festivals.

AN ACTIVE MUL TI-GENERA TIONAL PLACE FOR

RECREA TION AND SOCIALIZING
In order to be successful, South City Park needs
to expand its purpose beyond active sports, and
offer opportunities for self-directed recreation
and socializing. Existing sports and games
courts should be re-considered to encourage
regular daily use, and create a setting for more
spontaneous activities and uses that reflect the
interests and needs of the community. Adding
to the existing (mostly senior) audiences for
bocce and pickleball, South City Park could also
attract youth and teens with programming,
opportunities for self-directed learning and
recreation, and a place to be social.

When successful, such multi-generational
places have their own “organic” life and a true
sustainability that stems from the social capital
and relationships built between the people
in the community — from club members and
league players who host and participate in park
A stage at Madison Square Park‘s Big
Apple Barbecue Block Party in New
York City
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA20 Native plants help absorb stormwater
runoff, while providing a colorful
accent.

Major Themes (Cont.)
activities, to groups who simply contribute with
their regular presence and engagement. While
active programming will always be needed in
the space, the park could become once again
a place where neighbors meet for community
gatherings, friends bring picnics, teens hang out
and dog owners set up dog play-dates.

SUSTAINABILITY
The park has a significant number of mature
trees that should be preserved as much as
possible, and only replaced if the health of the
tree is in question. The park is already a green
environment that provides natural shade.

There is also an opportunity to add color and
excitement to the landscape by adding seasonal
landscaping and colorful plantings at key areas
like the main gateway, and near buildings. An
emphasis on native tree and plant species
both in and around the park (i.e. trees, grasses,
plants) can provide opportunities to connect
to the surrounding environment and create a
stronger physical link to the library. Plantings,
like vines on trellises or on the sides of buildings,
can be added to reduce re-radiated heat from
any hard surfaces in the park. Beyond these
more direct benefits, plants and trees are an
opportunity to cultivate stewardship in the park
with volunteer watering programs and tree
planting initiatives. To accommodate increasing
concerns about stormwater management, a
mix of rain gardens and bioswales should be
applied to key areas in the park and the adjacent
parking areas. These plantings will also help
offset the urban heat island effect, and help
with cooling in the summer months.

Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 21 Overcoming Challenges
The Recharge Station is a kiosk and a social environment in Times Square designed by PPS and operated by peer from Fountain House that connects people experiencing homelessness to services.

The community engagement process highlighted the most
important issues to address
It is clear that in its existing state South City
Park has some challenges. The community
engagement process, including surveys, focus
groups and interviews highlighted the most
important issues discussed below.

MAKING THE PARK A SAFE PLACE
Safety, and the perception of safety, were the
number one concern for survey respondents,
residents and various stakeholders. From a
placemaking perspective, making a place feel
safe and welcoming is a key prerequisite for
any type of improvement. To learn more about
the safety conditions in the park we spoke
with representatives of the Redding Police
Department (RPD), Department of Community
Services, Redding Library, park workers, and
the Good News Rescue Mission. We understand
that the community’s concerns about safety are
mostly driven by worries about people camping
and living in the park, a situation that in 2019 led
to the park being fenced off, and access limited
as a temporary measure. The COVID pandemic
has extended this temporary situation, and
the City of Redding is now determined to
simultaneously improve the park and address
safety concerns.

While solving the challenges of homelessness
in Redding is beyond the purview of this
placemaking effort, a set of strategies was put
forward to make the park safer and prevent
camping. RPD, the Good News Rescue Mission,
and other partners are working to provide
people experiencing homelessness with a
safe, welcoming and attractive place to spend
time during the day that is not the park, or the
parking lot between the library and the park. The
location, still being finalized, will offer amenities
such as picnic tables, shade and restrooms,
along with social services, meals, and other
supportive programs to people in need. At the
same time, the renovated South City Park will
offer activities and amenities to everyone in
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA22 Overcoming Challenges (Cont.)
Redding, but camping in the park will not be
allowed. South City Park, like any other public
space, will be made safer by attracting more
users to the space throughout the day, the week
and the seasons. The best way to make the park
feel safe is to make it attractive to everyone. To
have people in the park who take care of the
space, mediate conflicts, know each other, and
keep an eye out for each other.

In order for South City Park to be transformed
into the great community destination it has the
potential to be, the park will need to address
several other challenges that are linked to the
need to make it feel safe.

A NEED FOR A CRITICAL MASS OF USERS
First, the park will need to attract a critical
mass of users in order to become attractive
to everyone. This can be achieved with a very
intentional, closely monitored, and carefully
curated program of uses that focuses on
bringing specific audiences to the park at
different times of the day.

For example, mothers and caregivers with small
children should be attracted by a destination
play feature paired with educational and art
programming that links to library Story Time.

Seniors coming to play pickleball would also
be encouraged to come to the park in the
morning. A coffee cart could offer everyone
drinks and snacks. In the afternoon, older kids
and after school classes would be hanging out
in the teen area, working on robotics and art
projects, while the bocce league members meet
for a tournament in the late afternoon, and
dog owners bring the pets to the dog park for
their afternoon run. In the evening the entire
community would come together for movies on
the lawn with popcorn and beer provided by a
local brewery.

Right now this perfect day in the park sounds
unlikely, as existing amenities and programs do
not support this mix of uses. The need to create
a strong and diverse program requires that the
park goes beyond its current focus on organized
sports. This doesn’t mean that the K1 field will
not be an important element of the park, or that
Tiger Field will not be drawing visitors during
game season. It means that other activities are
needed to seed the park with life, and they will
need to be supported.

In Bryant Park, maintenance staff serve also as
park ambassadors, providing information and
constant care.

Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 23 Temporary sidewalk and bike lane experiment
in downtown Waco, TX.

A CONSTANT PRESENCE IN THE PARK
The surest way to enhance programming and
keep the park safe is provide for a constant
management presence in the park. While the
Parks Department doesn’t have the capacity
to assign a manager solely devoted to the park
at present, this may be a goal to pursue in the
future. For starters, the Parks Department, RPD,
Urban Park Rangers, and various programming
partners will need to carefully coordinate their
efforts to make sure that the park is not left
unattended. This will be particularly important
for the initial months after re-opening, as
the park establishes its regular users and
regular programs. The potential for a direct
linkage to the Redding Library offers additional
opportunities, as well as engaging existing
programming partners who are already doing
great work in the community such as Shasta
Living Streets. Investing in South City Park’s
revitalization means investing in management
and programming as well as in capital
improvements.

IMPROVING ACCESS AND SOFT-MODES OF

TRANSPORTA TION
Throughout the community engagement
process, in surveys, focus group discussions,
and interviews the challenges of improving
access to the park kept popping up. Everyone
agrees that walking and bicycle connections to
the park from the surrounding neighborhoods
and from downtown leave a lot to be desired.

We understand that CalTrans is planning some
crosswalks and pedestrian improvements
to S. Market Street (SR 273) as part of their
“Complete Streets” program, which are slated
for implementation in 2028. Advocates, however,
feel proposed improvements are insufficient,
and connections to the residential neighborhood
west of SR 273 need to be addressed with
a stronger vision. Other solutions, including
temporary crossings and pedestrian/bicycle
routes, should be pursued by the city to ensure
that neighbors, and youth can safely get to the
park.

Another challenge related to access is the
need for a clear, safe and welcoming vehicular
gateway into the park that puts Redding’s
caregivers at ease as they approach. Further
in this report we make recommendations
regarding creating a gateway on Grape Avenue,
but a secondary gateway on Parkview could also
be considered, especially if the safety strategy
goes forward.

Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 24 26 Programming
28 Sample Calendar of Events
30 User Experience Diagrams
32 Park Destinations
60 Full Plan and Schematic Design
Part 3:

Activation &
Design
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 25 When we build our communities around
places, it is not enough to have one single use
dominate a particular place— we need a diverse
array of activities and programs for a variety of
people.

Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA26 Programming
Concepts that arose during engagement and the importance of mixing programming with self-led activity
The placemaking process identified the types and mix of programming elements that would attract people to the renovated park on a regular basis through in-depth community engagement.

Proposed destinations within the park are defined through their function, character, and essential amenities that would support use and enjoyment. These destinations are described in the following pages.

TAXONOMY OF ACTIVITIES
When we build our communities around places, it is not enough to have one single use dominate a particular place— we need a diverse array of activities and programs for a variety of people. A carefully chosen range of activities will help a place attract a variety of people at different times of the day. A playground will draw young kids during the day, while a climbing wall will draw older kids after school, and concerts bring everyone together during the evening. These special events are also great at introducing people to the Park that will grow more comfortable in coming more regularly for self-led activation.

POWER OF 10+
The renovated South City Park endeavors to become a more successful park, it needs unique sub- places within it, each with a number of activities to engage people on a regular basis. Some of these activities are very simple – relax in the shade, play on the playground, watch other people, experience art, play sports or games, study, etc. Cumulatively, simple activities, sub-places and micro-destinations will make the great park the South City Park is poised to be.

Based on this concept and using the collaborative placemaking process, PPS has identified eight potential different destinations or sub-places within the new park, each with its own function, character, and purpose.

Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 27 Special
Events
Seasonal
Programming
Weekly
Programming
Daily Activation
Hierarchy of Needs for
an Active Public Space
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 28 Sample Calendar of Events
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 29 Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 30 Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 31 Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA32 ARRIVAL + ACTIVITIES PLAZA
7 ,300 SF
Meeting and gathering place at main gate
Signage and wayfinding
Seating
Art displays on fence
MUL TI-USE PERIMETER LOOP - 0.3 MILES
Loop path with distance markers for walking/
jogging/biking

DESTINA TION PLAY
25,200 SF
State of the art, creative, and unique play
Meet-up space with information for caregivers
Ample seating for caregivers
Shade over some of play area
Canopy or trellis shade over seating
Water feature - splash or misting pad

MUL TI-USE PAVILION
4,500 SF
Community celebrations and events
Catering kitchen
Restrooms accessible from outside
Outdoor facing stage
Markets, fairs, art events
Park equipment storage

INDOOR-OUTDOOR AREA/COVERED PORCH
1,600 SF
Concerts and performances
Film screenings
Exercise classes
Library programs
Art classes
Work/study
Lounging/relaxing
Birthday parties and small gatherings
Table games

FLEX LAWN
26,500 SF
Communal seating
Community gatherings
Yard games
Informal activities
Picnics

COURTS AREA
17 ,280 SF
Open-air exercise
Exercise programs for kids and adults
8 Pickleball courts

BOCCE COURTS (EXISTING)
Existing Bocce courts
Enhanced permanent bleachers
Renovated existing restrooms

YOUTH AREA
12,000 SF
Gathering area and ramps
Climbing and hangout element for kids over the age
of 12
Skate elements / rails
Loop skate path
Half Basketball Court
Ping pong tables
Bike repair
Maker corner/workshop area for robotics, remote
controlled cars, etc.

DOG AREA
6,000 SF
Agility course
Dog activities
Socialization for owners
Seating and shaded areas
Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA32 Design
Park Destinations
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 33 Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 34 Arrival and Gateways

EXTENDING THE PARK BEYOND ITS BOUNDARIES
Developing an access and gateway strategy for the streets leading to the park - Grape Avenue, Parkview Avenue, S. Market Street and Cypress Avenue - is key to transforming South City Park into a place that is welcoming to families and youth. While improving pedestrian and bicycle access is a longer term challenge, we understand that CalTrans is planning improvements to S. Market Street as part of their complete streets program. These improvements should include safe ways for pedestrians and cyclists to cross the street close to the park. In addition, stakeholders were excited about the opportunity to create pedestrian and bicycle connections to trails that go to the river, and other city parks.

Assembling a set of gateway features that will link the park to the Library and Tiger Field, and further afield to City Hall, and Safeway, will help make the park welcoming to all. There are two key outer gateway locations that need to be addressed - the intersection of Parkview Avenue and the park driveway adjacent to the library and the intersection of Grape Avenue and the park driveway along Tiger Field. While the Parkview Avenue location needs special care and consideration for the needs of the people spending time there, the Grape Avenue gateway could be prioritized for improvement right away.

A gateway treatment at this location could include colorful planters, branded flags and banners with language developed to be specific to the Park, and inviting directional signage. There is also an opportunity for a mural on Grape Avenue, potentially on the Tiger Field wall or on the ground at the intersection to achieve a strong sense of arrival and excitement. Focus group participants recommended involving the community in painting murals, and including teen art students.

The park already has multiple entry points, which unfortunately are not all functional at the moment. The entrance leading to the existing basketball court should be designated as the main entrance, and enhanced to provide wayfinding, explain the schedule of events and programming, and share information regarding court and field uses and new park destinations. The main entry point should be an obvious meeting and gathering place with comfortable seating, bike racks, plantings or planters, and art displays on the fence. The secondary entrance by Tiger Field should be signed appropriately to avoid confusion. Until pedestrian crossings are improved, the entrance ramp on S. Market Street should remain closed, while the entrance off Cypress Avenue could be managed with a lock pad to serve the proposed dog park.

Signage identifying park destinations will also be needed throughout the park, and along the main walkways. Most notably, the walkway along the S. Market Street wall can be completed in a full loop around the park and signed with distance markers for walking and jogging. The new sections needed to close the loop could be surfaced not with asphalt but with a softer, permeable material like compacted gravel to make for safer running and outdoor gym exercise equipment added to complete the experience. Interactive story trails that including “choose your own adventure” activities could also be conceived in the park with the help of Library staff.

Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 35 Examples of entrance, landscaping, and signage
creating a strong sense of arrival and direction.

Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 36 EntryEntry
Activity Activity
PlazaPlaza
CourtsCourts
Destination Destination
PlayPlay
Pavilion Pavilion
EntranceEntrance
Flex LawnFlex Lawn
Activities Plaza
7,300 SF

OVERALL CHARACTER AND USE
The activities plaza is located just outside of the playground and the main pavilion entrance. Visible from the Park’s main access point it will be a place for activities, such as Story time; table games; an outdoor reading room; outdoor arts and crafts for families, and a Market Plaza for the Farmers Market.

The function of this plaza is to draw people into the park, and provide a location for community activities that cannot take place on the Lawn, or indoors.

Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 37 Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 38 Destination Play

QUALITIES OF GREA T PLAYGROUNDS
Great playgrounds are attractive, colorful, fun and unexpected. Research by environmental psychologists, child development specialists, landscape architects, and educators shows that children need unstructured play that ignites the imagination, instead of forcing a child into a strict set of repeated motions, as most play equipment does.

The best play areas stimulate the type of play previously experienced in nature or in the woods, rather than focusing solely on equipment. They reproduce free play by offering “loose parts,” such as water, sand, woodchips, gravel, and other manipulable materials.

Successful play areas encourage interaction between age groups by offering something for everyone. They link play for different ages with social activities like eating and drinking.

Providing leisure activities and social opportunities for adults also means that parents will stay longer, giving children more play time.

OVERALL CHARACTER AND USE
A major audience that the renovated park would seek to attract is families and caregivers with children. The proximity to the library, which has a small reading garden and offers special programming for kids is a big asset for achieving this connecting library and park both physically and programmatically. Another element of this effort, mentioned by many in the engagement process, is the opportunity to install an exciting new play feature that would be a unique destination in Redding. High quality contemporary play equipment should be coupled with ample comfortable seating for caregivers and parents, new restrooms, shade, and potentially some opportunities for water play, such as a splash pad, a sprinkler or another simple water feature.

A new play area, with its additional amenities, is an opportunity to think of family experiences for kids of various ages. The park could offer engagement opportunities that go beyond play equipment and organized sports, through learning, arts, STEM and other programs in concert with the library. It is also worth considering some multi-use amenities and play equipment for older children, such as seating areas or climbing structures, for pre-teens to hang out and socialize, while their family is at the playground with younger siblings. 180’ x 140’ = 25,200 SF
(for comparison: Kids Kingdom is around 38,250 SF)
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 39 Destination play offers a variety of
features, as seen in examples from
Aspen and Houston.

Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 40 TreehouseTreehouse Rope Rope
PlayPlay
Theme Theme
playplay
Mound Mound
with slidewith slide
Treehouse
Rope Play
Fish Theme play Equipment-Alt 1
Shade over Rope Play
Destination Play-Components
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 41 Rope Rope
PlayPlay
Park Park
PavilionPavilionTheme Theme
playplay
Mound Mound
with slidewith slide
2-5 2-5
Play Play
Spray Spray
PadPad
“Bob the Fish” Theme play
Equipment-Alt 2
Spray Pad
Mound with slide
Entry Entry
Activity Activity
PlazaPlaza
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 42 Fish Themed Play Structure Choices
Kompan
Earthscape
Dyanamo Playgrounds
Inspiration for the fish theme for the
Destination Play area comes from the life of
the colorful Salmon that spawn in the area.

Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 43 Play Components
The play area and restroom at the pavilion will
be close to and visible from each other, similar
to this example from Levy Park in Houston.

Clockwise from top left: Rope Play; Mounds
with Slide; Tree House
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 44 Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 45 Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 46 Flexible Multi-Use Community Pavilion

OVERALL CHARACTER AND USE
Inviting families to the park will not be possible without some additional amenities, such as shade, a nice restroom, a place to get a drink of water, etc. During the engagement process many participants mentioned the need and opportunity to build a flexible community pavilion. This light structure could offer restrooms, space for community events and celebrations, an outward facing stage for park performances, potentially a catering kitchen, and a flexible space to accommodate seasonal markets, arts and crafts fairs, and other community events. The structure was envisioned as an indoor/outdoor space with rolling “garage-type” doors that make it a mostly open pavilion in the summer months, and an enclosed space for events and activities in winter.

The pavilion would also serve as an anchor for local festivals like Paesano Days, or Thursday Market Fest, which many remember fondly. It could host smaller events, similar to those curated and organized by Shasta Living Streets Lab downtown.

Building Size: around 4,500 SF
Footprint: 50’x100’
Orientation: long sides of the building are facing NE-SW Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 47 Examples of flexible pavilions from NYC and
Seattle.

Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 48 Service Service
AccessAccess
Cafe’Cafe’
RestroomsRestrooms KitchenKitchen
Open space Open space
for activities/for activities/
marketsmarkets
Meeting Meeting
roomroom
StageStage
EntranceEntrance
TerraceTerrace
PlaygroundPlayground
Flex LawnFlex Lawn
Activities Activities
PlazaPlaza
Flexible Multi-Use Community Pavilion
Components
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 49 Cafe’
Open space for activities/markets
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 50 1,600 SF
Indoor-Outdoor Area/Covered Porch and Stage

OVERALL CHARACTER AND USE
This flexible transitional space would be covered, but still feature outdoor seating and an outdoor stage attached to the community pavilion. Accessible from the outside even when the pavilion building is closed, the stage would offer access to power and water supply for outdoor performances, and events, and for impromptu activities. Somewhat sheltered from the elements, the space can also be a back-up venue for outdoor activities such as exercise, classes, arts, small gatherings, and library programs in the park.

A key feature of the outdoor stage function should be its accessibility and “plug and play” option. Participants in the placemaking engagement spoke about the design to offer a simple venue for young musicians and local garage bands to perform to small youth audiences, as low barrier to play venues have disappeared in Redding.

The canopy will extend 20-30 feet out facing West and Southwest to provide a seating patio overlooking the play area for caregivers.

Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 51 Outdoor terraces and porches extending
indoor spaces from Austin, Houston and
Redding’s own Turtle Bay Museum.

Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 52 Flex Lawn

OVERALL CHARACTER AND USE
While the park is green and has mature trees, in its existing condition it lacks a destination lawn space that is easily identifiable. A clearly defined flexible lawn space, using existing grass, with some small amenities can offer the proverbial park lawn experience. The lawn would be the place for picnics and gatherings, yard games, and tournaments such as corn hole tournaments, which were mentioned by stakeholders. It could be a great place for summer camps in great demand in Redding. The lawn would also be the viewing area for the outdoor stage/covered porch allowing for audiences to watch movies, performances, music, etc. It would also be the main location in good weather for outdoor exercise classes such as yoga, zumba, boot camp, etc. Other than a well maintained lawn, the area should offer moveable chairs, or lawn chairs, as well as various lawn game sets for people to use. It would also be a prime location for informal play like hula hoops, soap bubbles, or imagination play. 160’x200’ = 26,500 SF
Concert for 1,500 people Picnics for 30 groups Tent for a wedding/fundraising event for 400 people

BUILDING
STAGE

BUILDING
STAGE
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 53 Corn hole toss, outdoor movies and
imagination play are just a few of the many
uses of the flex lawn.

Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 54 17,280 SF
Courts Area

OVERALL CHARACTER AND USE
During the placemaking engagement we heard from pickleball players looking to take advantage of the existing tennis courts. We propose to repurpose and eventually renovate the existing tennis courts for pickleball, providing 8 pickleball courts. This would ensure that a larger number of players get to enjoy the space, while the City is exploring options at another location for tennis use. Repurposing the courts for pickleball would also connect the growing pickleball player community of Redding to South City park, while alleviating the demand in other city parks. The green space outside of the courts offers an opportunity for players to gather, picnic, share information and equipment, organize tournaments, and other activities.

Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 55 Provide comfortable permanent bleachers for
watching games and a patio with umbrellas
close to the renovated restrooms.

Bocce Courts

OVERALL CHARACTER AND USE
Members of the Redding Bocce League and other players are already enjoying the renovated Sons of Italy bocce court in South City Park. The courts are used for league tournament games as well as for practice and other games, and this use will only increase as access to the park becomes easier with park renovation.

The renovated bocce court offers portable bleachers which are shared with Tiger Field. The area could become a stronger focal point with permanent bleachers to the west of the court, which could be enclosed in the back to provide storage. The east side could remain open for either portable bleachers or for spectators and players to bring their own chairs. The bocce area includes the existing restrooms, which are serviceable but will ultimately need to be upgraded with new facilities.

Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 56 Youth A re a

OVERALL CHARACTER AND USE
Making South City Park an attraction for families, and a multi-generational place means offering a space and programs for youth – tweens, and early teens – besides organized sports. The City of Redding has great resources for organized sports, and we learned a lot about all the baseball and softball opportunities for children and youth. The existing K1 field will continue to support the needs of young players, and programmatic connections with Tiger Field will build excitement.

However, we see here an opportunity to diversify activities for kids and youth that will build off the destination play, and various park and library programs in an area intended for youth.

This area could take advantage of the paved area near the park building with uses like basketball, skateboard and bike-friendly elements, seating & climbing element specifically for kids 10 or older, ping pong tables, painted games etc. Additional programs could be offered for this age group like bike repair, and a maker corner or workshop area for robotics and remote-controlled cars potentially spearheaded by the Library, which is developing its maker space and maker resources.
150’ x 80’ = 12,000 SF
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 57 Examples of youth play and activities
including biking, skating, and maker programs.

Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 58 Dog Area

OVERALL CHARACTER AND USE
While there are some concerns about bringing dogs into the park, responsible dog owners and their pets make excellent park users as they tend to use dog areas regularly and in all weather. If dog use is deemed desirable, South City Park could offer a fenced dog run, with some agility course elements, seating for dog owners, and drinking water.

Conflicts between dogs and family use, which were mentioned in the stakeholder discussions, should be minimized by locating the dog park away from other activities, and keeping off-leash dogs within the fenced area. While the community of Redding enjoys ample outdoor space - backyards and trails - to exercise with their furry friends, dog areas are a prefect place for dogs and people to socialize and bond. 6,000 SF
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 59 Dog parks offer simple exercise equipment for
pets and plenty of space for dogs and their
owners to socialize, including seating.

Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 60 LIBRARYLIBRARY

EXISTING EXISTING

SOFTBALL FIELDSOFTBALL FIELD

MARKET STREETMARKET STREET

PARKVIEW AVENUEPARKVIEW AVENUE

PICKLEBALLPICKLEBALL

COURTSCOURTS

DESTINA TION DESTINA TION

PLAYGROUNDPLAYGROUND

EXISTING EXISTING

PARKINGPARKING

EXISTING PARK EXISTING PARK

BUILDINGBUILDING YOUTH AREAYOUTH AREA

EXISTING EXISTING

PARKINGPARKING
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 61 MARKET STREETMARKET STREET

MUL TI-USE MUL TI-USE

PAVILIONPAVILION

CYPRESS AVENUECYPRESS AVENUE

TIGER FIELDTIGER FIELD

PICKLEBALLPICKLEBALL

COURTSCOURTS

DESTINA TION DESTINA TION

PLAYGROUNDPLAYGROUND

FLEX LAWNFLEX LAWN

ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES

PLAZAPLAZA

EXISTING EXISTING

BOCCE AND BOCCE AND

RESTROOMSRESTROOMS

DOG AREADOG AREA
N

PERIMETER LOOPPERIMETER LOOP
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) Project for Public Spaces – South City Park – Redding, CA 62 Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park) 63 Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Project for Public Spaces Final Report (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park)

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO: !RI Office of Planning and Research FROM: City of Redding 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Public Works Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 777 Cypress A venue
Redding, CA 96001
!RI Shasta County Clerk
County of Shasta
P.O. Box 990880, 1643 Market Street
Redding, CA 96099-0880
Project Title: South City Park Project, J.0.# 9618~88
PrajectLocation-Speciflc:~90=0~P-=a=~=v=i=ew~A~v~e=n=u=e~--------------------~ Project Location - City: Redding Project Location - County: =S=ha=s=t=a__________ _ Description of Project: The City of Redding (City) will conduct a renovation project at South City Park. The project will include park amenities such as walking paths, lighting, landscaping, a large playground, parking improvements, shade structures, athletic courts, stage, storage building, and restroom. The project will involve modification or removal of existing buildings and structures ; vegetation removal and replanting; and installation of new equipment, structures, utilities, lighting, signs, and other recreational amenities. Construction will require demolition, earthwork, trenching, and paving. Work will be conducted on City property.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project: -=C=ity'-'--'o=f-=R=e=d=d=in""g,_____________________ _ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: Travis Menne, Project Manager Exempt Status: (check one)
D Ministerial [Section 21080(b)(l); 15268)
D Declared Emergency [Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)]
D Emergency Project [Section 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)]
D Statutory Exemptions. State code number:

D Common Sense Exemption (This project does not fall within an exempt class, but it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment (14 CCR 1506l[b][3]). !RI Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: Section 15301(d). Existing Facilities, 15302(c).

Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303(d & e). New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures. !RI No exceptions apply that would bar the use of a categorical exemption (PRD 21084 and 14CCR15300.2) .

Reasons why project is exempt: Class 1 exemptions include the minor alteration of existing public structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of new small facilities and equipment, or conversion of existing structures. The existing park will be renovated to meet public recreational needs with modem accessible amenities that meet public safety standards. The project will be located on the same site, will have the same purpose and capacity, and will result in a negligible expansion of use. The action area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Amber Kelley Telephone: 530.225.4046 If Filed by Applicant:

1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.

2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? o Yes o No Date: //-Jf-_;;)oc;ld, Signature: ~
Title: Environmental Com er
!RI Signed by Lead Agency Date received for filing at OPR: _____ _ D Signed by Applicant
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: South City Park CEQA NOE (9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Ordinance No. 2654, an uncodified ordinance of the City Council authorizing an amendment to the contract (C -99) between the City Council of the City of Redding and the Board of Administration of CalPERS as allowed in Section 20516 of the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (Employees Sharing Additional Cost) for Unrepresented Public Safety Management Employees.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact by adopting the ordinance for the additional cost sharing. The ordinance reflects the City Council’s (Council) previous action.

Alternative Action

The Council could choose not to adopt the attached ordinance. The City of Redding ’s (City) CalPERS contract for Unrepresented Public Safety Management group employees would not be amended.

Background

On November 1, 2022, the Council adopted a Resolution of Intention No. 2022 -118 to approve an amendment to the contract between the City and CalPERS, offered Ordinance No. 2654 for first reading by title only and waived the full reading authorizing the amendment. The amendment, when adopted, allows “classic local safety members” in the Unrepresented Public Safety Management Employees group to contribute an additional two percent (2%) toward the City’s employer contribution for a total of 8.5 percent (8.5%), effective January 8, 2023. This is MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.15(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.15(a)—Consider adoption of uncodified Ordinance No. 2654 amending City of Redding’s con tract with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) to allow classic local safety members in the Unrepresented Public Safety Management Employees group to share additional costs of the retirement benefit.

Sheri DeMaagd, Assistant
City Manager
Packet Pg. 332
Report to Redding City Council November 30, 2022
Re: 9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654 Page 2

the final phase of the contribution increases per the agreement between the City and the Classic Unrepresented Public Safety Management group, which was adopted May 4, 2021.

There is no change in the information prev iously presented and considered by the Council. The proposed adoption of the ordinance is being placed on the Regular Calendar portion of the agenda, as CalPERS prohibits the adoption of any retirement benefit change to be placed on a governing body’s Consent Calendar.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10 -year Financial Plans for all funds.”

Attachments
^Ordinance No. 2654
Resolution of Intention No. 2022-118
CalPERS Amendment to Contract - Exhibit
Packet Pg. 333
ORDINANCE NO. 2654

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF REDDING AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT

BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING AND THE

BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM

The City Council of the City of Redding does ordain as follows:

Section 1. That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Redding and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees’ Retirement System is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment on file in the City Clerk’s office, and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full.

Section 2. The Mayor of the City Council is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency.

Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption, and prior to the expiration of fifteen days from the passage thereof shall be published at least once in the Redding Record Searchlight, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Redding, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that this Ordinance was introduced and read at a r egular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 1st day of November, 2022; and was read and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 6th day of December, 20 22, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

________________________________
, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

_____________________________ ________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: ^Ordinance No. 2654 (9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654)

RESOLUTION OF INTENTION

TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT

BETWEEN THE

BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM

AND THE

CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF REDDING

WHEREAS, the Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees' Retirement System by the execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure by which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments to said Law; and

WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is the adoption by the governing body of the public agency of a resolution giving notice of its intention to approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall contain a summary of the change proposed in said contract; and

WHEREAS, the following is a statement of the proposed change:

Section 20516 (Employees Sharing Additional Cost) of an additional 2% for classic local safety members in the
Unrepresented Public Safety Management group.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the governing body of the above agency does hereby give notice of intention to approve an amendment to the contract between said public agency and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, as an "Exhibit" and by this reference made a part hereof.

By: _________________________________
Presiding Officer

_________________________________
Title
________________________________
Date adopted and approved

(Amendment) CalPERS ID# 4091792151
CON-302 (Rev. 6/12/19)
Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Resolution of Intention No. 2022-118 (9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654) Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: CalPERS Amendment to Contract - Exhibit (9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654) Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: CalPERS Amendment to Contract - Exhibit (9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654) Packet Pg. 338
Attachment: CalPERS Amendment to Contract - Exhibit (9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654) Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: CalPERS Amendment to Contract - Exhibit (9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654) Packet Pg. 340
Attachment: CalPERS Amendment to Contract - Exhibit (9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654) Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: CalPERS Amendment to Contract - Exhibit (9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654) Packet Pg. 342
Attachment: CalPERS Amendment to Contract - Exhibit (9.15(a)--Adopt uncodified Ordinance No. 2654)

Redding City CouncilDecember 6, 2022

Redding City Council
December 6, 2022